HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/20/1979WEDNESDAY, JUNE 20, 1979
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA,
ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 20, 1979, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W.
SIEBERT, JR.; R. DON DEESON; AND PATRICK B. LYONS. ALSO PRESENT WERE
JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L. S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTER-
GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY.TO THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; BAILIFF
DAN FLEISCHMAN; AND JANICE CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERK.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
ATTORNEY COLLINS LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG,
AND REVEREND LESLIE AVCHIN, CHRIST UNITED METHODIST BY -THE -SEA, GAVE
THE INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 24, 1979.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF MAY 24, 1979, As WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE,ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1979.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
JUNE 6, 1979, AS WRITTEN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEES.ON,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLLS, COUNTY COURT,
MAY -JUNE TERM, 1979, IN THE AMOUNTS OF $173.40 AND $97.40.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL
FUNDS TO MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT DUE TO THE
BREAKDOWN OF THE
HYDRAULIC
HOIST CYLINDER ON ONE OF THE
REFUSE STATION
COLLECTOR TRUCKS,
AS FOLLOWS:
k(zOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT No.
INCREASE
DECREASE
MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT
01-4210-338
$3,000.
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES
01-9990-701.00
$3,000
JUN 2 01979 BOOK 41 PACE 01
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
REPORT OF TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU - SPECIAL TRUST FUND, MAY, 1979
REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, CIRCUIT COURT, MAY, 1979
TRAFFIC VIOLATION FINES BY NAME - MAY, 1979
INSPECTION REPORT OF COUNTY AND MUNCIPAL DETENTION FACILITIES:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL - MAY 29, 1979
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS ROSEMARY RICHEY APPROACHED THE BOARD
TO DISCUSS THE PRECINCT CHANGES AND THE PURCHASE OF NEW VOTING MACHINES.
SHE RECOMMENDED THAT PRECINCT 5, CARPENTERS HALL - WITH 3,000 VOTERS
BE SPLIT USING ROUTE 60 AS THE DIVIDING LINE. THE SECTION SOUTH OF
ROUTE 60 WOULD BECOME PRECINCT 5E AND WOULD VOTE AT OUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN
CHURCH. MRS. RICHEY STATED THAT SHE SPOKE TO MR. BENEDICT AT ST. EDWARDS
SCHOOL, AND THEIR LARGE CAFETERIA CAN BE USED AS A VOTING PLACE. SHE
CONTINUED THAT BY USING THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY AS THE DIVIDING LINE,
EVERYONE WHO LIVES ON SOUTH BEACH OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS WOULD VOTE
AT ST. EDWARDS SCHOOL, WHICH WILL BE PRECINCT 5D; ROCKRIDGE WILL REMAIN
PRECINCT 5B. SHE CONTINUED THAT BY DOING THIS, THE PRECINCTS WILL BE
EVEN, AND THE TRAFFIC FLOW WILL BE BETTER, FIRS. RICHEY CONCLUDED THAT
ALL PRECINCT LINES•ARE NOT MOVED, JUST SPLIT; SHE MUST SEND THE CHANGES
AND MAPS TO TALLAHASSEE, AND REQUESTED THAT THESE CHANGES BECOME EFFECTIVE
.JANUARY 1, 1980.
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE TWO NEW
PRECINCTS, AS OUTLINED BY MRS. RICHEY, TO BE EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1,
1980, AND INCLUDED AUTHORIZATION FOR ADVERTISEMENT.
MRS. RICHEY INTERJECTED THAT WE SHOULD ADVERTISE THE WILD
TURKEY AREA ALSO, WHICH WAS RECENTLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH.
SHE CONTINUED THAT MORE VOTING MACHINES ARE NECESSARY -AS WE NEED ONE
VOTING MACHINE FOR EVERY 350 PEOPLE.. MRS. RICHEY STATED THAT,$13,000
IS LEFT OVER FROM LAST YEAR S BUDGET, AND POSSIBLY SHE CAN FIND SOME RE-
CONDITIONED VOTING MACHINES THAT COST BETWEEN $700 TO $900 APIECE. SHE
FURTHER STATED THAT 15 MACHINES ARE NEEDED, AND SHE HAS TO ADVERTISE FORBIDS.
MRS. RICHEY COMMENTED THAT WE HAVE OVER 25,000 REGISTERED•VOTERS NOW,
AND THEY TRY TO PUT AT LEAST TWO MACHINES IN EVERY PRECINCT.
DISCUSSION OF PURGING THE BOOKS FOLLOWED, AND -MRS. RICHEY
ADVISED THAT POSTCARDS ARE SENT OUT TO PEOPLE WHO HAVEN IT VOTED IN TWO
2
• BOOK 4�; FA. �E ®2
;lU�12 01�7�
YEARS; IF THEY DO NOT RESPOND, THEIR NAMES ARE REMOVED FROM THE BOOKS.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS DISCUSSED STORAGE OF THE VOTING MACHINES,
-AND IT WAS ADVISED THE PROVISIONS BE MADE FOR THEIR STORAGE.
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LAY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS TO
ADVERTISE FOR THE PURCHASE OF 15 VOTING MACHINES AND ADOPTED THE FOLLOW-
ING BUDGET AMENDMENT TO MAKE FUNDS AVAILABLE FROM THE CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
ACCOUNT:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE
EQUIPMENT 01-2441-402.00 $13,016
SALARY- CONTRACTUAL 01-2441-103.00 $10,204
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 01-2441-204.00 $ 141
OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-2441-205.00 $ 2,140
COMMUNICATIONS' 01-2441-333.00 $ 305
MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 01-2441-338.00 $ 226
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
SEVERAL MEMBERS OF FIRST FEDERAL OF FORT PIERCE WERE HERE TO PRESENT
IDEAS RELATIVE TO THE HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY.
MR. MICHAEL BROWN, PRESIDENT OF FIRST FEDERAL OF FORT PIERCE,
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY NOW HAVE TWO OFFICES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
THE NEWEST ONE LOCATED IN THE ROSELAND SHOPPING CENTER. HE CONTINUED
THAT FROM OCTOBER, 1978, TO MAY, 1979, WITH JUST ONE OFFICE, THEY WERE
THE LARGEST LENDER IN THE COUNTY. MR. BROWN NOTED THEY ARE AN ACTIVE
SUPPORTER OF THIS COUNTY, COMMITTED TO LOCAL LENDING, AND HAVE MADE OVER
$16,000,000 'NORTH OF LOANS SINCE THE FIRST OF THE YEAR. HE QUESTIONED
WHETHER THESE BONDS WILL BENEFIT THE GENERAL PUBLIC OR JUST A SMALL PER-
CENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AS THE GOVERNMENT IS ALLOWING THE PRESENT
RATES TO BE AT THESE LEVELS TO COMBAT INFLATION. MR. BROWN REPORTED
THAT RATES ARE HIGH RIGHT NOW, BUT MONEY IS STILL AVAILABLE FOR SOUND
LOANS; NOT LIKE IT WAS IN 1973. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY WILL BORROW
$15,000,000 FOR THIS PLAN AND HAVE HAD TO PAY FOR THESE FUNDS PRIVATELY
AT A MUCH HIGHER RATE THAN WHAT THE COUNTY IS PLANNING TO LEND. MR.
BROWN STATED THAT IF THEY HAVE TO CHARGE ONE RATE TO A PERSON WHO MAKES
OVER $15,000 AND ANOTHER RATE TO ONE WHO MAKES UNDER $15,000, THIS WILL
3
JUN�Q177
BOOK 41 PACE 03
A
CREATE A TWO-TIER RATING SYSTEM, AND IT WILL BE HARD TO HANDLE. HE CON-
TINUED THAT INTEREST RATES HAVE PEAKED, AND THE BUYING PUBLIC MAY BE
ABLE TO BENEFIT. HE REPORTED THAT 39% OF THEIR LOANS WERE UNDER $30,000
AND 50% WERE UNDER $50,000. MR. BROWN COMMENTED THAT THE BULK OF THEIR
LOANS ARE SERVING THOSE THAT THE COUNTY IS LOOKING TO LEND TO, AND THEY
DO OFFER 95% LOANS. HE FELT THAT IF WE PUMP UP THE DEMAND FOR HOMES,
THE PRICES WILL GO UP AND THE PEOPLE WILL BE PRICED OUT OF THE MARKET;
AND HE QUESTIONED WHETHER THERE WAS REALLY A NEED FOR THIS IN INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY. MR. BROWN NOTED THAT IN SOME AREAS, THIS TYPE OF FUNDING
IS USED AS AN INCENTIVE, BUT FELT WE DO NOT HAVE A SOCIAL DECAY PROBLEM
HERE. HE STATED FURTHER THAT THE PROBLEM OF MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS IS
NOW BEING DISCUSSED, AND WASHINGTON IS CONSIDERING DISCONTINUING THEM. AS
THE REVENUE BOND PROGRAMS ARE THE LEAST EFFICIENT. MR. BROWN SAID THERE
ISA FEDERAL EXPENDITURE.THROUGH THE TAX ROLLS, AND ONLY 40% OR 50% IS
PASSED ON TO THE HOME BUYER; ALSO, THE GOVERNMENI 15 VKUVuZ)tivu uiviwu r
$400 TAX CREDIT TO THE HOME OWNER - THIS WOULD ELIMINATE THE BOND PROGRAM
AND KEEP LOCAL GOVERNMENT OUT OF THE LENDING BUSINESS. MR. ISROWN THEN
MENTIONED THE MERITS OF THE HOME OWNERS WARRANTY PROGRAM AND FELT MORE
INPUT SHOULD BE OBTAINED BEFORE THE BOND PROGRAM IS PASSED. HE CONTINUED
THAT THE COUNTY IS GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE AND CONTROL A HOUSING
PROBLEM AT NO COST TO THE COUNTY -'BUT IT IS GOING TO COST SOMEBODY. HE
FELT IT WILL INCREASE TAXES, AND THE BULK OF THE COUNTY WILL BE PAYING
FOR THIS BY USING THIS BOND PROGRAM, MR. BROWN CONCLUDED BY STATING,
THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THIS BE GIVEN MORE STUDY AND BE DIS-
CUSSED WITH THE LOCAL LENDERS BEFORE ITIS ADOPTED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF ST. LUCIE COUNTY HAD ANY HOUSING
FINANCE AUTHORITY PROGRAMS,
MR, BROWN STATED THAT THEY DID NOT; THAT HE HAD SPOKEN TO
DIFFERENT PEOPLE WITH THE HOW PROGRAM.AND VARIOUS ST. LUCIE COUNTY
OFFICIALS, AND THEY ALL FELT'SINCE PEOPLE WERE NOT BEING DEPRIVED OF
HOUSING, THEY WOULD NOT GET INTO IT. HE FURTHER SAID THEY ARE TRYING
TO COME UP WITH ANOTHER ANSWER THAN TO GET LOCAL GOVERNMENT INTO THE
MORTGAGE AND LENDING BUSINESS.
4
BOOK 41 pAcE 04
P
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD INFORMED SIR. BROWN THAT WE
DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE HOUSING IN THE COUNTY, ESPECIALLY FOR THE SERVICE
PEOPLE WHO ARE NEEDED HERE, AND WE HAVE TRIED TO SELECT A PROGRAM WHICH
WILL HELP THE PEOPLE WHO NEED HELP AND WILL CREATE THE LEAST POSSIBLE
CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING INSTITUTIONS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT A LENDING INSTITUTION LENDS
THE MONEY, AND THE COUNTY ACTUALLY IS NOT IN THE MORTGAGE BUSINESS.
MR. BROWN STATED THAT THEY READ ABOUT THIS PROGRAM IN THE PAPER
AND WERE NOT AWARE THAT IT WAS APPROVED AND COMING BEFORE THE COMMISSION.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS COMMENTED THAT WHEN THEY
INITIATED THE PROGRAM, THEY DECIDED TO DEAL ONLY WITH THOSE LENDERS WHO
HAD THEIR HOME OFFICES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. MR. THOMAS NOTED THAT
IT IS A VOLUNTARY PROGRAM, AND TWO LOCAL INSTITUTIONS WANT TO GO INTO
THIS PROGRAM. HE FELT WE HAVE A HIGHLY TECHNICAL SITUATION AND, REFERRING
TO THE NATIONAL ECONOMY, FELT THEY ARE THE SOURCE OF OUR CURRENT INFLATION
PROGRAM, HE FURTHER NOTED IF THE INSTITUTIONS. DECIDE. .TO.MAKE•A LOAN,
THEY GET THE BENEFIT OF SERVICING THE LOAN, BUT THEY SELL IT TO THE
HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY.
MR. BROWN STATED THAT IF THE PROGRAM GOES THROUGH, THEY WANT
TO PARTICIPATE IN IT. HE FELT, HOWEVER, THAT PEOPLE MIGHT BE RELUCTANT
TO GIVE THEIR WHOLE FINANCIAL PICTURE IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR THE LOAN.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON POINTED OUT THAT THIS DISCUSSION HAS ONLY
COVERED THE INCOME ASPECT. OTHER ASPECTS ARE NET WORTH OF THE INDIVIDUALS
WHO WISH TO QUALIFY AND THE PRICE OF THE HOUSE,
IT WAS POINTED OUT TO MR, BROWN THAT THIS PROGRAM IS INTENDED
TO PROVIDE HOUSING FOR THE INDIVIDUAL WHO CANNOT QUALIFY UNDER THE CURRENT
STANDARDS; I.E., IT WOULD SERVE THE PEOPLE THE BANKS WOULD REJECT FOR A
LOAN. IN SETTING THE GUIDELINES, IT IS HOPED WE CAN PROFIT BY THE MIS-
TAKES MADE IN OTHER LOCALITIES.
COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT IF ANYBODY ON THE HOUSING FINANCE
AUTHORITY BOARD DOES NOT FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES, THE BOARD HAS THE RIGHT
TO REMOVE HIM.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE REITERATED THAT THE COUNTY IS NOT GOING TO LEND
THE MONEY, WE ONLY AUTHORIZE THE BOND; WE DO NOT WANT TO.COMPETE WITH
THE LENDING INSTITUTIONS AND HOPE THEY DO NOT OPPOSE THE PROGRAM,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON INTEREST RATES.
5
JUN 2 0, 197'9 18,00K 41 P,r a, 0
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO
QUALIFY TODAY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO QUALIFY ONE YEAR FROM NOW DUE TO THE
INFLATION RATE OF BUILDING MATERIALS. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE WILL BE
SOME INDIVIDUALS WHO CAN QUALIFY, AND HE CAN `T PROMISE THAT EVERYBODY
WOULD HAVE TO BE TURNED DOWN BY A BANK BEFORE THEY COULD QUALIFY..
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ANNOUNCED THAT THE APPOINTMENT OF THE FIVE
MEMBER HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY WILL BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE NEXT COMMIS-
SION MEETING.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS NEXT DISCUSSED THE HIRING
OF THE BOND COMPANY AND REFERRED TO RESOLUTION N0. 79-10 WHICH WAS SIGNED
IN .JANUARY, 1979. HE CONTINUED THAT BEFORE HOUGH & COMPANY CAN PROCEED
FURTHER, THEY NEED TO HAVE A SEPARATE AUTHORIZATION FROM THE BOARD TO
PROCEED WITH THE BONDS. ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT IF WE ARE GOING TO
PROCEED WITH HOUGH& COMPANY, THE BOARD SHOULD CLARIFY IT AT THIS TIME.
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CONTINUE THE RELATIONSHIP WITH
HOUGH & COMPANY TO FULFILL THE INTENT OF THE HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE THAT WAS PASSED AT THE LAST MEETING.
ARTHUR K. WILSON APPROACHED THE BOARD TO ASK THEM TO CONSIDER
THE POSSIBILITY OF SEWER AND WATER ALLOCATIONS FOR THE NORTHWEST CORNER,
OR 30 ACRES, OF THE HIBISCUS AIRPORT. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD BE
BUILDING REASONABLE, BLUE-COLLAR WORKER TYPE OF HOUSING OF GOOD QUALIFY,
AND IT WOULD HAVE DEED RESTRICTIONS TO BE SURE THAT IT WOULD BE A CREDIT
TO THE COMMUNITY. MR. WILSON SAID THE PURPOSE IS TO HAVE LOWER COST
HOUSING; HE WOULD PLAN TO SERVICE THE AREA WITH ROADS AND SEWER AND WATER,
IF POSSIBLE, AND MAY WORK IN PARTNERSHIP WITH A TORONTO FIRM. HE CON-
TINUED THAT SEVERAL LOCAL BUILDERS HAVE EXPRESSED INTEREST IN MULTIPLE -
TYPE HOUSING, AND BY USING COMMON WALLS, CONSIDERABLE SAVINGS CAN BE MADE.
HE IS HOPING TO DRAW THE $35,000 TO $40,000 BRACKET, SUBJECT TO INFLATION.
MR. WILSON SAID THAT THE TORONTO BUILDER IS INTERESTED IN PREFAB HOUSING,
IF APPROVED BY COUNTY PLANNING, AND MR. WILSON IS PREPARED TO GIVE FINAN-
CIAL STATEMENTS.
E
JUH
2 0 1979 Bads 41 wa 0
EA
L 1
O
DEAN LUETHJE, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, PRESENTED A FEW PROPOSALS
TO THE BOARD IN REGARD TO SEWER AND WATER FOR THE PROJECT. HE STATED.
THAT THEY WOULD NOT WANT TO HAVE TO CONSTRUCT THEIR OWN SEWER AND WATER
PLANTS;•THEREFORE, THEY WOULD VERY MUCH LIKE TO WORK SOMETHING OUT WITH
THE COUNTY. MR. LUETHJE CONTINUED THAT, ESTIMATING 250 UNITS, MEDIUM
DENSITY, THE AMOUNT OF SEWER AND WATER NEEDED WOULD BE 100,000 GPD,
THEIR FIRST PROPOSAL WOULD ENTAIL RECEIVING A 100,000 SEWER ALLOCATION
FROM THE COUNTY WITH WHICH THEY COULD GO TO THE CITY AND SEE IF THEY
COULD CONNECT TO THE CITY SEWER FORCE MAIN. MR. LUETHJE NOTED THAT THEY
WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY RELEASE FROM THE COUNTY FOR
THE WATER SERVICE AREA SO THEY COULD GO TO THE CITY TO GET SERVICE.
THE SECOND POSSIBILITY WOULD BE TO GET A SEWER ALLOCATION FOR 100,000 GPD
AND MAKE A'CONNECTION INTO THE CITY FORCE SYSTEM; THEN COME*TO THE COUNTY
AND OFFER A GOOD WATER SUPPLY, AS THEY ARE PREPARED TO DO A TEST WELL
ON THE SITE. MR. LUETHJE STATED THEY WILL OFFER TO CONSTRUCT A LARGE
WELL ON THE HIBISCUS .AIRPORT SITE, AT A COST OF $30,000 TO $50,000, IN
ORDER TO GET 500,000 TO 700,000 GALLONS PER DAY. HE FELT THIS WOULD BE
A HELP TO MID -FLORIDA UTILITIES SYSTEM, WHICH THE COUNTY HAS RECENTLY
PURCHASED, AND DISPLAYED SKETCHES WITH A POSSIBLE ROUTING. MR. LUETHJE
EXPLAINED THE THIRD CONSIDERATION WHICH WOULD BE TOTAL RELEASE FROM THE
COUNTY FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AREA; THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE INCLUDED
IN THE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AREA IN THE CITY, AND THEY COULD OFFER WELL
SITES ON THE PROPERTY TO THE CITY.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED WHO WOULD PAY FOR THE RAW WATER
LINE TO THE TREATMENT PLANT, AFTER THE TEST WELL HAD BEEN DROPPED, AS
MENTIONED IN'THE SECOND ALTERNATIVE.
MR. LUETHJE STATED THAT THEY WOULD BE TALKING OF A SWAP -OFF.
HE DID NOT KNOW WHAT THE COST OF THE RAW WATER LINE•WOULD BE, BUT FELT
THERE WOULD BEA STRONG POSSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY WANTING TO PUT MORE
WELLS ON THE SITE IN THE FUTURE. MR. LEUTHJE NOTED THAT THEY WOULD DEED
AND RECORD IN THE PLAT TWO WELL SITES AND TAKE THE NECESSARY 100' SETBACKS,
AND THEY WOULD CONSTRUCT THE FIRST WELL.
DISCUSSION ENSUED REGARDING THE SIZE OF THE WELL*SITES.
7
JUN 2 0 1979
�� 4 . PAGE ^7
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THIS HAS MERIT, AS FAR AS WATER SUPPLY,.
AND THAT IT MIGHT BE HELPFUL IN DEALING WITH THE CITY SINCE THE CITY
ALWAYS HAS BEEN RETICENT IN MOVING IN THE AREA OF ADDITIONAL WATER AND
SEWER. HE CONTINUED THAT MID -FLORIDA UTILITIES SYSTEM IS SET UP FOR
TWO WELLS, AND THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT IT WOULD BE ABLE TO TREAT THAT
WATER. HE FELT THAT ADDING A WELL TO THE SYSTEM WOULD BE A SHOW OF FAITH
ON THE COUNTY'S PART THAT THEY REALLY ARE GOING INTO THE BUSINESS AND
THAT IT WOULD CREATE A FAVORABLE ATMOSPHERE WITH THE CITY.
MR. LUETHJE COMMENTED THAT IT MAY TAKE THREE TO FOUR YEARS TO
TOTALLY PHASE OUT THIS SUBDIVISION, AND A PARCEL OF LAND COULD BE DEEDED
TO THE COUNTY FOR THE RAW WATER LINE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS REPORTED THAT THE CITY HAS TO PUT MORE WATER
TOWARD THE SOUTH AND WEST. THEY GET FURTHER FROM THEIR TREATMENT PLANT
AND MUST FIND WELL SITES,. AND IT COULD BE THE CITY MIGHT WANT TO GET
TOGETHER WITH THE COUNTY TO SERVICE AREAS FARTHER FROM THEIR TREATMENT
PLANT.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON WATER ALLOCATION.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT QUESTIONS NEED TO BE ANSWERED BEFORE
ANYTHING CAN BE.ALLOCATED AND SUGGESTED THE COUNTY TALK TO THEIR ENGINEERS
TO_SEE WHAT WOULD BE THE BEST THING TO DO.
CHAIRMAN VIODTKE AGREED THAT WE NEED TO HAVE THE ENGINEERS
DETERMINE IF THE PLANT WOULD HANDLE THE ADDITIONAL WATER AND TO EXPLORE
THE COST OF THE TRANSMISSION LINE. HE COMMENTED THAT WE DO HAVE A CON-
TRACT WITH THE CITY WHICH CALLS FOR NO ADDITIONAL TAP -INS. CHAIRMAN
WODTKE EXPRESSED CONCERN REGARDING THE COUNTY HAVING THE OVERALL USE OF
THE WELLS; THE AMOUNT OF MONEY NEEDED FOR A TRANSMISSION LINE; AND
WHETHER THE LINE WILL BE USEFUL TO THEM IN FIVE YEARS.
MR. LUETHJE NOTED THAT THEY ARE JUST LOOKING FOR SOME GUIDANCE
FROM THE BOARD. THEY WOULD PREFER NOT TO HANDLE THE SEWER, AS SMALL
PACKAGE PLANTS ARE NOT THE MOST DESIRABLE, BUT IT IS AN ALTERNATIVE.
HE COMMENTED THAT A SMALL TEST WELL, COSTING APPROXIMATELY $1,000, SHOULD
GIVE THEM A SAMPLE OF THE QUALITY OF THE WATER, AS THIS INFORMATION MIGHT
BE CRITICAL TO HAVE.
JUN 20199
Bou 41 PnUE 08
R
COMMISSIONER LOY REQUESTED MR, LUETHJE TO SUBMIT HIS PROPOSALS
TO ENABLE THE ENGINEERS TO REVIEW HIS SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVES (WHICH
PROPOSALS ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES), AND COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT VOLUNTEERED TO WORK WITH THEM ON THIS STUDY,
Water -•Either temporary or permanent release from County
water service area to allow Wilson to work with City to
serve this area.
Alternate II• - Sewer
Same as Alternate 1
Water - Allow Wilson to connect to existing County System.
In turn Wilson will give County two well sites on the
30 acre parcel and construct one well on one of the
sites. County would have to construct raw water line to
their existing plant.
Alternate III - Sewer & Water
Give Wilson release on sewer and water service area from
County and allow Wilson to work with City on serving this
area with both sewer and water.
DEAN LUETHJE, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, NEXT APPROACHED THE BOARD
REPRESENTING FRANZ SHROPA AND TOM JARVIE OF PAN—AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY WISH TO REQUEST A SEWER
ALLOCATION TO CONNECT TO THE 6TH AVENUE SANITARY FORCE MAIN FOR THE
PROPOSED VERO BEACH CENTRAL PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER, MR, LUETHJE NOTED
THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF -THE BOUNDARIES OUTLINED IN THE
RECENT RESOLUTION, BUT FELT IT WOULD BE FEASIBLE FOR THEM TO JACK UNDER—
NEATH U,S,HIGHWAY I TO GET TO THE 6TH AVENUE MAIN, HE STATED THAT THEIR
JUN 20M
Li� ASSO(11A I'ES, INC.
CARTE
GONSUL'I'ING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
MARVIN E. CARTER, R.L.S.
}iI,{1�8, 1 ACsf STB{ET
j� ;
1057
DANA HaIVARD• R.L.S.
62.419 •
,f`�OS • 562-a 191
DEAN E. LUETHJE, P.E.rn
.961
To: Indian River County Commission
�(,=
FROM: Carter A$sociates, Inc., - Dean I,uethje
SUBJECT: Water & Sewer to Northwest Corner of Hibiscus Airport -
Art Wilson - 30 Acres .
Alternate Proposals.
Alternate I - Sewer
100,000 GPD Sewer Allocation from County
to Wilson,
allowing him to connect to Citv System.
Water -•Either temporary or permanent release from County
water service area to allow Wilson to work with City to
serve this area.
Alternate II• - Sewer
Same as Alternate 1
Water - Allow Wilson to connect to existing County System.
In turn Wilson will give County two well sites on the
30 acre parcel and construct one well on one of the
sites. County would have to construct raw water line to
their existing plant.
Alternate III - Sewer & Water
Give Wilson release on sewer and water service area from
County and allow Wilson to work with City on serving this
area with both sewer and water.
DEAN LUETHJE, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, NEXT APPROACHED THE BOARD
REPRESENTING FRANZ SHROPA AND TOM JARVIE OF PAN—AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY WISH TO REQUEST A SEWER
ALLOCATION TO CONNECT TO THE 6TH AVENUE SANITARY FORCE MAIN FOR THE
PROPOSED VERO BEACH CENTRAL PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER, MR, LUETHJE NOTED
THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF -THE BOUNDARIES OUTLINED IN THE
RECENT RESOLUTION, BUT FELT IT WOULD BE FEASIBLE FOR THEM TO JACK UNDER—
NEATH U,S,HIGHWAY I TO GET TO THE 6TH AVENUE MAIN, HE STATED THAT THEIR
JUN 20M
SEWERAGE FLOW WOULD BE 25,000 GPD. MR. LUETHJE CONTINUED THAT THEIR
FIIRST BUILDING, 40,000 SQ. FT., WOULD BE COMPLETED BY NOVEMBER 1,•1979.
HE FURTHER STATED THAT THEY WERE ON THE AGENDA FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AT
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ON .JUNE 14TH, BUT IT HAS BEEN
RESCHEDULED TO JULY 12TH; BEFORE THEY CAN RECEIVE SITE PLAN APPROVAL,
HOWEVER, THEY NEED A SEWER ALLOCATION.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT EXPRESSED SURPRISE THAT SOMEBODY WOULD
BE BUILDING A SHOPPING CENTER WITHOUT A SEWER ALLOCATION.
MR. LUETHJE EXPLAINED THAT THEY HAD PLANNED TO BUILD A SEWER
AND WATER PLANT ON THE SITE, AND CAN PROCEED TO GET A FRANCHISE TO OPERATE
IT, BUT FELT IT WAS MORE PRACTICAL FROM THEIR STANDPOINT TO BE ABLE TO
CONNECT TO THE 6TH AVENUE FORCE MAIN AND NOT TREAT THE SEWER ON THEIR SITE.
CHAIRMAN ,'VODTKE POINTED OUT THAT THE BOUNDARIES ARE SET, AND
WE CANNOT EVEN SERVICE ALL THE AREA WITHIN THOSE BOUNDARIES; IT IS ON A
FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE FELT WE ARE GIVING SEWER
ALLOCATIONS TO BUSINESSES INSTEAD OF PEOPLE.
COMMISSIONER LOY DID NOT FEEL WE SHOULD CHANGE THE BOUNDARIES
WHICH HAVE BEEN SET SINCE THE ALLOCATIONS ARE JUST NOT THERE, AND HER
REACTION WAS THAT THE BOARD WOULD. HAVE TO TURN DOWN THIS REQUEST. COMMIS-
SIONER SIEBERT AGREED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE REQUEST FROM PAN-AMERICAN
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR AN ALLOCATION OF 25,000 GPD BECAUSE THE
COUNTY ALREADY IS BOUND TO A SPECIFIC SERVICE AREA.
MICHAEL O'HAIRE APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD REGARDING THE INDIAN
SUMMER PROJECT AND STATED THAT THIS WAS NOT A REQUEST FOR SEWER SERVICE,
BUT A REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION. HE CONTINUED THAT HIS CLIENTS HAVE
CONTRACTED TO BUY THIS PROPERTY'AND WANTED ASSURANCES THAT THERE WERE
UTILITIES AND THE DATES THE SERVICE WOULD BE AVAILABLE. MR. O'HAIRE
CONTINUED THAT HE DOES HAVE MINUTES OF THE COMMISSION MEETINGS WHERE
DISCUSSION PERTAINING TO THIS WAS HELD, AND MR. JENNINGS HAS INFORMED
HIM THAT MR. BEINDORF'S OFFICE IS STUDYING THE MATTER. 'HE FURTHER STATED
THAT THE DEVELOPER OF INDIAN SUMMER AGREED TO PAY $15,000, AND NOW HIS
CLIENTS WOULD BE IN AGREEMENT TO PUT THE MONEY "UP FRONT" TO TAKE CARE
OF THIS PROBLEM.
10
JUN 2 0 '1979 MOK 41 PAGE
ri
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT UNFORTUNATELY, THE -
DECISION MADE BY THE BOARD WAS MADE ON INCOMPLETE DATA REGARDING THE
OPERATION OF THE PLANT, AND AT THE TIME, IT APPEARED THAT A SURGE TANK
WOULD BE THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEM. A MORE DETAILED INVESTIGATION OF
THE PLANT HAS SINCE REVEALED MANY DEFICIENCES: THE PLANT IS NOT LEVEL;
THE HYDRAULICS ARE NOT CORRECT, PIPES HAVE TO BE REBUILT; THE "AS BUILT"
DRAWINGS DO NOT CONFORM TO THE ACTUAL INSTALLATION OF THE PLANT; THE LIFT
STATIONS ARE NOT WORKING PROPERLY AND:MAY BE TOO SMALL, ETC. IT NOW
APPEARS THAT THE COST FOR RENOVATION OF THE LIFT STATIONS AND THE SEWER
PLANT MAY RUN ABOUT $60,000 INSTEAD OF $3,000,WHICH THE COUNTY NAIVELY
ASSUMED WOULD CORRECT THE SITUATION WHEN THEY FIRST TOOK OVER THE PLANT.
MR. NELSON STATED THAT ELLIOT GROSH OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH WILL BE
WORKING WITH THE COUNTY ON THE RENOVATION. HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE THAT, UPON COMPLETION OF
THIS STUDY, THE BOARD CONSIDER A COMPLETE RENOVATION OF THE PEBBLE RAY
SEWER TREATMENT..PLANT.TO.BRI!NG LT:UP TO THE STANDARDS REQUIRED BY THE CITY,
AND THAT THE COST BE BORNE BY THOSE SERVICED BY THIS RENOVATION, INCLUD-
ING INDIAN SUMMER.
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THAT IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT $60,000
TO RENOVATE THIS SEWAGE SYSTEM, WE OUGHT TO TURN OUR ATTENTION TO GETTING
THAT SYSTEM OUT OF BUSINESS AND INTO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH SYSTEM,
HE STATED THAT ENGINEER BEINDORF WAS GOING TO FURNISH PRELIMINARY FIGURES
ON HOW THAT COULD BE DONE.
• ATTORNEY O'HAIRE STATED THAT REGARDLESS OF INDIAN SUMMER, THE
COUNTY HAS THE DER AFTER IT ABOUT THIS PLANT. HE NOTED THAT HIS CLIENT
IS NOT LOOKING FOR A FREE RIDE, BUT JUST WANTS TO KNOW WHAT HIS POSITION
IS SO HE CAN GET GOING.
COMMISSIONER LYONS INTERJECTED THAT THE BOARD BASED THEIR
DECISION ON THE BEST INFORMATION THEY. HAD AVAILABLE AT THE TIME.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT THE COUNTY INHERITED A VERY
INFERIOR SYSTEM IN THIS SEWER TREATMENT PLANT. HE INFORMED THE BOARD
THAT THE REALTOR, MR. MCGEE, SAID IF THE ADMINISTRATOR WOULD WRITE A
LETTER STATING THAT THIS COMMITMENT WAS FIRM, THAT WAS ALL THAT WAS
NEEDED TO TRANSFER FROM ONE DEVELOPER TO ANOTHER, BUT MR. .JENNINGS FELT
THIS IS A CRITICAL SITUATION AND HESITATED TO WRITE A LETTER OF THAT SORT.
• li
JUN -2 01979 aaax 4i PACE �.
I
O
THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT WHEN WE CAN COME UP WITH GOOD, SOLID
ENGINEERING FIGURES, WE WOULD THEN KNOW JUST HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST,
MR. O'HAIRE STATED THAT WHAT HE NEEDS FROM THE BOARD IS A
COMMITMENT STATING THERE IS A SEWER SYSTEM AVAILABLE.
COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT SHE WISHES TO GET RID OF THAT
SEWER PLANT, BUT THOUGHT WE OUGHT TO FORGET ABOUT THE 12" WATER LINE
GOING TO INDIAN RIVER SHORES. SHE FELT WE MUST GO TO THE ENGINEERS AND
THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND TAKE CARE OF THAT PART OF THE COUNTY AS IT IS
OUR RESPONSIBILITY, BUT THE IDEA OF RENOVATING A SYSTEM THAT DOESNIT
WORK SEEMS UNREASONABLE TO HER. COMMISSIONER LOY FELT MR. O'HAIRE NEEDED
THE ASSURANCE THAT THE COUNTY WOULD DO SOMETHING, AND SHE. STATED A
SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED, AND IN THE MOST ECONOMICAL MANNER.
.JOHN ROBBINS, OF BEI:NDORF & ASSOCIATES, STATED THAT ORIGINALLY
THEY WERE ASKED BY THE COUNTY TO PERFORM CONSULTATION SERVICES TO ALLEVI-
ATE PROBLEMS AT THE SEWAGE PLANT AT PEBBLE BAY. HE CONTINUED THAT THIS
WORK HAS BEEN STARTED AND HE HAS A LIST OF RECOMMENDATION OF WHAT WAS
REQUIRED. MR, ROBBINS STATED THAT HE PERFORMED CURSORY INSPECTIONS OF
ALL THE LIFT STATIONS, AND THEY WERE ALL IN VERY BAD CONDITION. HE HAD A
PROPOSED "SCOPE OF WORK" TO GET THE SYSTEM BACK IN OPERATION AND FELT IT
MIGHT HAVE TO BE MODIFIED CONCERNING THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. MR. ROBBINS
EXPLAINED THAT THEIR CONSULTATION SERVICES WOULD BE PERFORMED'UNDER AN
EXISTING CONTRACT, WHICH•DOES NOT INCLUDE TYING THIS SYSTEM INTO THE
CITY OF VERO BEACH SYSTEM. HE MENTIONED THAT MR. GROSH OF THE CITY OF
VERO BEACH IS WILLING TO WORK WITH THEM.,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THAT POSSIBLY WORK ON THE LIFT .STATIONS
COULD STOP, BECAUSE ANY DOLLARS SPENT ON RENOVATION OF THE PLANT IS GOING
TO BE MONEY WASTED IF WE CONNECT TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH SYSTEM.
COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED AND POINTED OUT THAT THE CITY MIGHT
.WANT A DIFFERENT TYPE OF LIFT STATION. HE ALSO NOTED THAT IF THE SCOPE
OF WORK IS TO ARRANGE TO TIE THE SEWAGE LOAD IN THAT AREA TO THE CITY OF
VERO BEACH, NOT NECESSARILY INVOLVED WITH THIS SYSTEM AT ALL, WE MAY NOT
NEED THE LIFT STATIONS WE HAVE NOW.
MR. ROBBINS FELT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO DEFINE'THE PROBLEM.
ATTORNEY 0'HAIRE STATED THAT HIS CLIENT WOULD BE PREPARED TO
CONTRIBUTE FOR CREDIT "UP FRONT" $15,000 TO THE COST OF THE ENGINEERING
STUDY, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IF IT IS MORE THAN $15;000, HE WILL
PAY HIS PORTION OF THE LOAD.
12
r
J U -N 20 1979 600K 41 PACE 1
COMMISSIONER Loy MENTIONED THAT THE $15,000 WAS APPLICABLE
WHEN THE MOTION WAS MADE IN JANUARY, AND WE ARE COMMITTED TO PROVIDE THE
SERVICE.IN SOME MANNER IN THAT AREA.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE COMMISSION MAY HAVE VESTED
ITSELF BY THE MOTION, BUT NOW THE FACTS ARE DIFFERENT, AND THERE SHOULD
BE A CLARIFICATION THAT THE COMMISSION IS NO LONGER BOUND BY THAT MOTION.
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER .
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO RESCIND THE ACTION OF THE COMMISSION
MEETING ON JANUARY 24, 1979, IN WHICH WE WERE TO ALLOW INDIAN SUMMER TO
ADD THEIR 36 UNITS TO THE EXISTING PACKAGE SYSTEM FOR $15,000 FOR THE
SURGE TANK MODIFICATION SINCE WE NOW HAVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDICA-
TING THAT THE $15,000 MAY NOT BE AN EQUITABLE PAYMENT AND THAT ADDITIONAL
MODIFICATIONS MUST BE MADE TO THE SYSTEM IN ORDER TO MAKE IT OPERABLE;
AND AGREED, I.N'PLACE OF THE PREVIOUS ACTION, TO ACCEPT THE SEWAGE FROM
INDIAN SUMMER THROUGH A RENOVATED PACKAGE PLANT OR BY CONNECTION TO THE
CITY OF VERO BEACH; INDIAN SUMMER TO BE EXPECTED TO PAY A PROPORTIONAL
CHARGE FOR THE COST OF MAKING THE SYSTEM OPERABLE.
ATTORNEY O`HAIRE STATED THAT THE MOTION ACCOMPLISHES WHAT HE
NEEDS,
MR. ROBBINS REPORTED THAT HE WILL BRING BACK A MODIFIED SCOPE
OF WORK THIS AFTERNOON OUTLINING THESE ITEMS, AND AN ESTIMATED COST,
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER APPROACHED THE BOARD IN REGARD TO A
RELEASE OF EASEMENTS IN CRYSTAL SANDS SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY LEROY
CARTER. HE DISCUSSED THE DRAINAGE SITUATIONS BETWEEN LOTS 2 AND 3 ON
THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF THE SUBDIVISION AND FELT THERE IS NO NEED FOR
MR. CARTERS EASEMENT TO BE THAT LARGE.
CHAIRMAN.WODTKE ASKED ABOUT THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST.
MR. CARTER EXPLAINED THAT HE WISHES TO BUILD A GARAGE AT THE
BACK OF HIS HOME, AND THE WAY HIS LOT IS LANDSCAPED, HE -CANNOT GET BACK
THERE.
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER NOTED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED R-1
WITH A 10� SETBACK, AND THERE IS A PRIVATE UTILITY POLE ON THE PROPERTY.
13
JUN 2 01979 1 Boos 41 ' PAGE 13
P
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT THE 24' EASEMENT WAS PUT
THERE TO TRY TO TAKE CARE OF THE DRAINAGE PROBLEM, AND NOW THAT THE
DITCHES RUNNING EAST AND WEST HAVE BEEN IMPROVED, WE DON'T NEED THAT MUCH
OF AN EASEMENT,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT CLEANING OUT THE DITCHES, AND THE
ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED THAT THERE IS 12' ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED HOW MUCH OF A RELEASE MR. CARTER
WOULD NEED, AND HE RESPONDED JUST ENOUGH TO GUARANTEE INGRESS AND EGRESS.
MR. CARTER STATED THAT HE LIVES ON LOT 7, BLOCK 1, AND DISCUS-
SION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE PETITION SIGNED BY ADJOINING"PROPERTY OWNERS ALSO
APPROVING THE REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS FELT THAT IF 2' WERE RELEASED, MR.
CARTER COULD USE THE EASEMENT BUT COULD NOT PAVE IT.
COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE COUNTY
WANTED TO PUT IN A DRAINAGE DITCH, AND THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT COULD BE
AN ISSUE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT WE SHOULD NOT RELEASE ALL OF IT, BUT
ENOUGH FOR MR. CARTER'S NEEDS.
MOTION WAS MADE Bv COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 79-55 APPROVING THE RELEASE OF EASEMENTS
IN CRYSTAL SANDS SUBDIVISION TO LEROY CARTER AND TO AUTHORIZE THE SIGNA-
TURE OF THE CHAIRMAN; THESE DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED AT THE EXPENSE OF
THE APPLICANT; THE EASEMENTS TO BE RELEASED BEING AS FOLLOWS:
THE SOUTH 2' OF THE NORTH EASEMENT OF LOT 7, BLOCK 1;
THE SOUTH 2' OF THE NORTH EASEMENT OF LOT 6, BLOCK 2;
THE NORTH 2' OF THE SOUTH EASEMENT OF LOT S, BLOCK 1; AND
THE NORTH 2' OF THE SOUTH EASEMENT OF LOT 7, BLOCK 2, CRYSTAL
SANDS SUBDIVISION.
DISCUSSION ENSUED REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF PUTTING IN A
SEWER ON THE EASEMENT, AND THE BOARD WAS INFORMED THAT THERE IS A JUNK
YARD ADJOINING THE PROPERTY AND 40 ACRES OF LAND TO THE EAST OF MR,
CARTER'S PROPERTY,
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT
MR. CARTER COULD BE PROHIBITED FROM USING THAT EASEMENT AREA FOR DRIVEWAY
PURPOSES, AND.COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT IT WAS FAIR TO ADVISE HIM OF THAT
REMOTE POSSIBILITY.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
14
JUN 2101979 mox FacE 14
I M-1 - . I MELLI
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER NEXT APPROACHED THE BOARD FOR A RELEASE
OF EASEMENTS IN GLENDALE TERRACE SUBDIVISION AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT A.
DEWITT, HE CONTINUED THAT 8 YEARS AGO MR. DEWITT BUILT HIS HOME OVER THE
PROPERTY LINE AND NOW WANTS TO CORRECT THIS SITUATION. ZONING DIRECTOR
WALKER RECOMMENDED THAT THE SIDE LOT.LINE EASEMENTS BETWEEN THE LOTS
BE ABANDONED.
MR. DEWITT STATED THAT HE WANTED TO ERECT A 6' FENCE IN HIS
BACK YARD AND DISCOVERED THAT HIS HOME IS SITTING RIGHT ON THE EASEMENT
THAT RUNS BETWEEN LOTS 11 AND 12.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 79-56 AUTHORIZING THE
RELEASE OF EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS -11 AND 12, BLOCK 2, GLENDALE TERRACE
SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT A. DEWITT, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNA-
TURE OF THE CHAIRMAN; DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE
APPLICANT.
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD REGARDING AN
ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF LOTH STREET BETWEEN 23RD AVENUE AND 27TH
AVENUE IN SHADY ACRES SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY WILLIAM Q. AND DOROTHY
M. HAYS AND WALTER AND .JANE BURKETT. HE DISPLAYED PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE
AREA AND EXPLAINED THERE ARE SOME EASEMENTS IN THE SUBDIVISION, AND A
DITCH RUNS EAST AND WEST ACROSS 24TH AVENUE INTO SHADY ACRES.
MR. HAYS COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY DID NOT ACCEPT THE DEDICA-
TION BUT CAN COME ALONG AT ANY TIME FOR MAINTENANCE.
COMMISSIONER LOY EXPLAINED THAT WAS A STANDARD STATEMENT IN
ANTICIPATION OF SEWER AND WATER. SHE THEN ASKED ABOUT 1OTH STREET BEING
OPEN.
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER STATED THAT THE STREET IS OPENED AND
IS GRASSY, BUT NOT MAINTAINED.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS EXPLAINED BY THE ATTORNEY THAT
IF YOU ABANDON THAT PORTION,"THERE WILL BE NO ACCESS TO EASEMENTS. HE
INQUIRED AS TO THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT.
MR. HAYS EXPLAINED THAT THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MOTORCYCLES,
AND THERE -IS A PIECE OF PROPERTY TO THE WEST RECENTLY SOLD AND THEY MIGHT
WANT TO PAVE HALF OF THE STREET.
15
JUN 2 01979 . Boos 41 PACE 15
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS COMMENTED THAT THERE IS A GENERAL COM-
PLAINT OF MOTORCYCLES RIDING THROUGH AREAS DISTURBING PEOPLE. HE SUG-
GESTED PUTTING UP A BARRICADE AT THE END OF THE DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY.
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER REPORTED THAT HE DIDN'T HAVE A RECOM-
MENDATIONS BECAUSE THERE IS A DRAINAGE DITCH THERE AND STATED THAT MR.
HAYS IS ASKING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ABANDONMENT OF THE ROAD.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ASKED WHERE THE DITCH LIES IN THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY,'AND MR. WALKER RESPONDED THAT IT LIES ON THE SOUTH 35' OF THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD KEEP AN
EASEMENT FROM 27TH AVENUE TO 20TH AVENUE SO THAT YOU DO HAVE AN EAST TO
WEST EASEMENT FOR FUTURE UTILITIES.
WILLIAM KOOLAGE OF 815 26TH AVENUE STATED THAT IF THAT PIECE
ON LOTH STREET IS COMPLETELY ABANDONED BY THE COUNTY, IT WOULD BE A
PROBLEM AS THEY ALREADY HAVE A PROBLEM ON 26TH AVENUE AND NEED MORE EAST -
WEST DRAINAGE.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THAT THIS ITEM BE DELEGATED TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FOR A
RECOMMENDATION ON THE DRAINAGE AND OTHER EASEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE
SOUTH SIDE OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF SHADY ACRES SUBDIVISION AND THAT HE COME
BACK WITH SUCH RECOMMENDATION AT THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT OTHER PROBLEMS SUCH AS A STREET
SYSTEM AND ACCESS TO OTHER UTILITIES,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
DENIED WITH COMMISSIONERS SIEBERT, Loy, DEESON, AND CHAIRMAN WODTKE
VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE REQUEST OF WILLIAM Q. AND DOROTHY M.
HAYS AND WALTER AND .JANE-BURKETT TO ABANDON A PORTION OF 10TH STREET BE-
TWEEN 23RD.AVENUE AND 27TH AVENUE IN SHADY ACRES SUBDIVISION.
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER APPROACHED THE BOARD AND -EXPLAINED THAT
GRENVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION IS SUBDIVIDED INTO 35' LOTS, AND HAS BEEN
REZONED TO R-lMP•ZONING. THE STREETS THAT ARE IN ARE NOT BEING USED,
AND IT IS JUST A 10 ACRE TRACT OF WOODED LAND, MR.-TURMAN IS NOW RE-
QUESTING ABANDONMENT OF THE ROADS IN GRENVIEw GARDENS SUBDIVISION.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED MR. TURMAN IF HE OWNED EVERY LOT IN THE
SUBDIVISION, AND MR. TURMAN REPLIED AFFIRMATIVELY.
16
JUN 2.0 1979
BOOK i PAG io
I
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT SINCE THERE ARE NO STRUCTURES
IN THE SUBDIVISION NOWj HIS REMEDY WOULD.BE TO VACATE THE ENTIRE PLAT,
AND COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED,
ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER REPORTED THAT MR. TURMAN WILL HAVE TO
COME TO THE ZONING COMMISSION AND THE TAC COMMITTEE, AND IT WILL BE SET
UP AS A MOBILE HOME TRACT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT MR, TURMAN HAS TO ASK THE
BOARDS PERMISSION FOR VACATION OF THE PLAT AND SUGGESTED THAT AN AD BE
PUBLISHED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD.
MR, TURMAN STATED THAT HE WILL DO WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO
COMPLY, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED HE RETAIN AN ATTORNEY TO HELP
WITH THE VACATION OF THE PLAT.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIQNER DEESON, TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR VACATION OF RE -PLAT
#Z OF GRENVIEW GARDENS SUBDIVISION, OWNED BY LLOYD H. TURMAN,
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS SUGGESTED THAT IN VACATING THE PLAT THAT
40' ALONG OSLO ROAD, WHICH IS THE NORTH -SOUTH EASEMENT FOR UTILITIES,
BE RETALNED, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT COULD BE TAKEN CARE OF AT THE TIME OF
THE PUBLIC HEARING.
MR. TURMAN STATED THAT HE WOULD GO ALONG WITH ANY REQUIREMENT
THAT THE COUNTY MAKES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE:
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE PROBLEM MR. TURMAN HAS IN GETTING
TO MEETINGS, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT IF MR. TURMAN COULD NOT ATTEND,
HIS COUNSEL WILL APPEAR IN HIS BEHALF.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
THE BOARD THEN ADJOURNED AT 12:10 O'CLOCK P.M. FOR LUNCH AND
RECONVENED AT 1:35 O:CLOCK P.M. -WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT.
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS REPORTED THAT HE HAS RECEIVED THE BARBER
AVENUE CONTRACT FROM KUNDE, DRIVER, SIMPSON & ASSOCIATES.AND BELIEVES THEY
CAN -PUT INTO EFFECT THE SCHEDULE WORKED OUT ON PAGE Z. HE ESTIMATED
THAT BARBER AVENUE COULD BE COMPLETED IN JUNE, 1980, AND IF THE BOARD
APPROVED, THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS COULD BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL
NEWSPAPER TODAY. THE BIDS ARE TO BE RECEIVED ON AUGUST -8TH AND COULD BE
AWARDED ON SEPTEMBER 5TH, HE CONTINUED THAT THE PLANS THAT WERE MADE ON
BARBER AVENUE STOPPED SHORT OF WHERE HE HAD THOUGHT IT WOULD GO, BUT IT
17
JUN 201979 aoaa 41 PAGE 17
DOES GO PAST THE DOCTOR'S COMPLEX, AND IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE MODIFIED IN
ANY WAY TO TAKE CARE OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE.
DR. PAUL TAYLOR STATED THAT CONSTRUCTION WOULD NOT START UNTIL
AUGUST, BUT BUILDING A OF THE DOCTOR'S COMPLEX SHOULD BE OCCUPIED IN
MARCH OR EARLY APRIL OF 1980, AND BUILDING D MAY NOT BE READY UNTIL .JUNE.
HE CONTINUED THAT MOST OF THE HEAVY TRUCKS ARE FINISHED GOING OVER BARBER
AVENUE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT HE HAS REVIEWED THE CONTRACT
AND APPROVES IT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO IMMEDIATELY ADVER-
TISE FOR BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BARBER AVENUE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THAT THE BIDS BE RECEIVED ON AUGUST 8,
1979, AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. AND THE CONTRACT BE AWARDED ON SEPTEMBER 51
1979.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR S. LEE NUZIE,
CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR, TO ATTEND CEFA COUNTIES MEETING AT TAVARES,
FLORIDA, ON JUNE 20, 1979.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING ITEM 11 ON THE AGENDA REGARDING
THE E. J. DANIELS GOSPEL CRUSADE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO REMOVE ITEM.11 FROM THE AGENDA
BECAUSE IT DID NOT GO THROUGH STAFF.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISCUSSED AWARDING OF BIDS FOR
USED KITCHEN EQUIPMENT, WHICH WERE OPENED ON JUNE 14, 1979. HE CONTINUED
THAT THE BID COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THE ITEMS CIRCLED BE AWARDED, AS SHOWN
IN THE FOLLOWING BID TABULATION:
18
JUN 2 01979 BOOK 41 f-�,E 18
vt,)Ar1U Ur %,UUN 1 , %,%j A I Iv1 I JJ I` 04&-nO
146-14 h Avenue
2t
/
t1
I Vero Beach. Flori�a 32967
v 'I U wO • w 4
BID TABULATION
'
0
1b ^ Ci CI 4
BID NO. IRC_ 00 DATE OF OPENING
�w
�'� Y^� / acryF
{ June 14,1974
;BIO TITLE Sale of Used Kitchen
�v c° e
o
1
3 r O J
I ITEM NO.
ANO. DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE .UNIT PRICE
11, Free standing tray
NB 200 i 00
2. 11?t nd cold table
V / a cc. outlets
00-1 0
3. standtv
200 00
ingable'free
4, preparation
tegteble
250 1001,
5. Wall mounted shelf
50 00
6.3 cor;paritment pot
C0'7
175 00�
7. 2arrrtment sink
t isposa
100 00
8. - steam 'kettles
366
+00
00
I
9.. `.2-20 gal coffe urns
166
300 J-00' j
10. "L" shaped serving toi,
500 100
11. ink bape w7 cabinet
200 j 0017 i
12. Hef'g w lift top
200 100
self contained compressor
Grill and deep fry
300 00 I
13. unit
14. "Silver" sink unit
106 j00
100 00
15. Bis!Twasher
126 {00
NB
16. Sercptable
100 I 00
Misc. items in lain kitchen
17. Vulcan as broiler
B
200 100i'
18. Vulcan deep fry unit
j
.B
5Q QEI
19. Same as item 16 without
75 00
a rt pan & ban ba k t
20. Vulcan gas range
i
75 00
Vulcan fiat tpp gas
75 100
�21.
ran e
I22. Vulcan grill top
75 100
23. 2 tier pizza or baker's
e
50 .00
24. Baker's table
200 00 45
00
Wall mounted baker's shelf
50 100
25.
wall mounted.shelf w
26.brAIce
200 100
27. Walk in ref'h & freezer
l
150'{00'.
28. Walk in refIg u recazer
doors-
100 100
I
29. Walk in freezer w/b.lowe,
i100 j(30 ,
unit & CcAn2ressor
30. Saras item 29.
�
i
1
7500e
i I._4
Wa_r. in cooler-blawer
75 X00
31. unit and compressor
32. Same as item 31
I
75 QOj
75 100
Nh
33. 5ar..e as item 3I
!
Total Awarded
598
00
4675
00
Certified a True Price Recordi-per_
�
1
NEI 27ELSOId, .airman
JUN 2 0 1979 BOOK 41 f4GE 19
I"
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE BID
COMMITTEE FOR THE SALE OF USED KITCHEN EQUIPMENT,
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NEXT DISCUSSED THE AWARDING OF
BIDS FOR THE COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM SIGNS, WHICH WERE OPENED ON .JUNE 14, 1979,
AND STATED THAT THE BID COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS ACCEPTING THE BID OF
$2,460.78 FROM THE MUNICIPAL SIGN CO., AS SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING BID
TABULATION:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
2145 -14th Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
BID TABULATION
CIO'
fi
41 0
(-7 fi C
BID NO.
IRC -09
DATE OF OPENING
June 14 1979
BID TITLE County Road Signs
ITEM DESCRIPTION
NO.
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
1. County Road Signs (Reflective)
186 ea.
NB
14
80
13 23
j
tj
2. Time required for deliver
21-4
r
Certified a True Price Recording.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED,AND IT WAS HOPED THAT THE COUNTY WOULD NOT
BE TAKING DOWN SERVICEABLE SIGNS.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT THE PRESENT STATE ROAD
MARKERS ARE ONLY TEMPORARY AND MUST BE REPLACED, AND THE NEW SIGNS WILL
BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE'S SIGN CRITERIA. HE FURTHER STATED THAT
THE BACKS OF THE OLD SIGNS COULD BE USED FOR OTHER SIGNS.
20
��Z
BooK 41 20
J
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE BID
COMMITTEE TO ACCEPT THE BID FROM MUNICIPAL SIGN CO. FOR THE PURCHASE OF
186 SIGNS AT $13.23 EACH, AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID MEETING
SPECIFICATIONS.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NEXT DISCUSSED THE VARIOUS
BIDS FOR THE AIR CURTAIN DESTRUCTOR AND COMBUSTION CHAMBER. HE CONTINUED
THAT THEY ARE STILL COVERING TREE STUMPS AND.DEBRIS AT THE LANDFILL, AND
THE CONSULTANTS FELT THAT BY PURCHASING THIS ITEM, IT WOULD INCREASE
THE LIFE OF THE LANDFILL FROM 1-3/4 TO 2 YEARS. MR. NELSON STATED THAT
THE BID COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE LOW BID OF V, A. KUTRIEB, INC.,
BE ACCEPTED, AS SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING BID TABULATION:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2145-141h Avenue
Vero Beach. Florida 32960
BID TABULA T IOM
i
j
• Sy
.BID NO.
IFC-ltl
DATE OF OPENING
Jun. 14, i�
IV �4� v
i ` L 3 n
i � 7
�
BID TITLE Air Curtain Destructor
j and Combustion ChamberITE
NO. DESCRIPTION
1 N0.
I UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
Air Curtain restructor
F
12802
_
I �t
2. Combustion Chaiber for
Curtain Pestructor
2504.4
00
NB
TOTAL
37846
* 37470
0
(Bid a
a
packa
unit)
Delivery cine require
3• in days after receipt
of our purchase order
28
4
90
.I
Certifidd true price recording
Neil Nelson, Chairman
21�
JUN 201979
ma mt21
-
I
i
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ADDED THAT THEY ALSO RECOMMEND}
PURCHASING A USED DRAGLINE FROM THE -ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT FOR $6,000,
AND THAT A RAMP AND A ROAD BE BUILT. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT $52,840
IS IN THE BUDGET FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE AIR CURTAIN DESTRUCTOR,
DISCUSSION ENSUED, AND THE BOARD WAS INFORMED THAT THE COMBUS-
TION CHAMBER WOULD BE PLACED BELOW THE TOP OF THE RAMP; THERE WOULD BE
STAGING AREAS OFF OF THE ACCESS ROAD; AND THE DEBRIS WOULD BE MOVED TO
THE READY AREA AND DROPPED INTO THE CHAMBER. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR
NELSON STATED THAT THE RAMP WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE MADE OF CONCRETE, JUST
SUPPORTED, AS RECOMMENDED BY ENGINEER BEINDORF.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED ABOUT THE LIFE OF THE AIR CURTAIN
DESTRUCTOR, AND MR. NELSON REPLIED THAT THE PIECE OF EQUIPMENT COULD LAST
20 YEARS IF TAKEN CARE OF.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE BID COMMITTEE
AND ACCEPTED THE BID OF 1'1. A. KUTRIEB, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $37,470.00,
FOR THE AIR CURTAIN DESTRUCTOR AND COMBUSTION CHAMBER, AS BEING THE LOWEST
AND BEST BID MEETING SPECIFICATIONS; APPROVED THE PURCHASE OF A USED
DRAGLINE FROM THE ROAD & BRIDGE -DEPARTMENT; AND APPROVED THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A'RAMP AND ROAD.
COMMISSIONER LYONS INTERJECTED THAT WE SHOULD LOOK INTO THE
POSSIBILITY OF USING STEAM TO DO THE JOB AT THE LANDFILL, AND COMMIS-
SIONER SIEBERT EXPLAINED THAT THIS POSSIBILITY ALREADY HAS BEEN STUDIED
AND PROVED UNFEASIBLE.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NEXT DISCUSSED THE AWARDING OF
BIDS FOR 6` HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE AND ADVISED THE BOARD THAT THE BID
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ACCEPTING THE BID FROM HERCULES FENCE CO., AS SET
OUT IN THE FOLLOWING BID TABULATION:
22
JUN 2 01979
BOOK 41 PA",E 22
veru owdcn, r1orlad JLyoU
BID TABULATION
NO. DATE OF OPENING
IRC -11 I June 14, 1979
TITLE 6 Foot Iiigh 2" `Mesh, 9 Gage
r
v j
G y4
a � /
q Al
.yQV
40
ell
I
4
o
CS
0
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE`
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT P
Total 'Material Cost
4790 p0
4290
15
4774
0
4123
89
4999
00
NB
i
i
.
Total Labor Cost To
900
30
900
00
11507
.60
949
00
1033
100
1155
75
I
Number Of Days To
Complete Fence
30
20
� 15
15
I
30
-
1 '
TOTAL5690
0
5190
95
6281
70
5072
891603
00
1155
175
:(Labor!
On iy 1
I
i
Certified true price r•cordirLL,
Feil Nelson Chairman
I
ON NOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE BID
COMMITTEE AND ACCEPTED THE BID OF HERCULES FENCE CO., FOR 6' HIGH 2" MESH
9 GAGE CHAIN LINK FENCE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,072.89, AS BEING THE LOWEST
AND BEST BID MEETING SPECIFICATIONS.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE HERCULES KONTOULAS APPROACHED
THE BOARD AND REPORTED THAT $5,273 WAS RECEIVED FROM THE BID ON THE USED
KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND $660 WAS RECEIVED FROM THE BID ON THE USED LAUNDRY
EQUIPMENT, MAKING A TOTAL OF $5,933 SALVAGED FROM THE OLD HOSPITAL COMPLEX
TO DATE. HE THEN PRESENTED THE BOARD THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING
DEMOLITION OF THE CORRIDOR CEILINGS IN.PHASE #1:
23
JUN 201979
800K 41 FACE 23
I
A
6/8/79
TO: County Commissioners
FROM: Hercules Kontoulas
Construction Project Repr.easentative SUBJECT RE:
PHASE #1 - Removing existing corridor ceilings to expose piping
PHASE #2 - Removing some large.rooms with suspended acoustical
the ceilings to expose piping.
GENERAL IRFORMATION :
At the suggestion of Mr. Jim Pennick, M.E. and Mr. Fred Kirsch,
and Mr. Ron Singh of Connell, Metcalf & Eddy, if we could remove the
existing ceilings, we would realize the following: '
1. A savings in construction bidding.
2. A great deal of copper piping for salvage. At this tizr�e
and point, I cannot give any "pounds- figure" or "dollar figures".
It is projected at this time that the following will occur:
TIME: Approximately three weeks to complete Phase #1.
COST: Six laborers @ $3.38 per hr.
• plus .94 fringe benefits
$4.32 per hr.
$4.32 x 40 hrs. = $172.80 wk. x 3 a $518.40
$518.40 x 6 men = $3,110.40 labor
1 - 30 cu. yd. container =,no cost
10 - loads of container @ $25.00 - $250.00
(lightweight acoustical tile)
5 - loads of container @ $50.00 = $300.00
(heavy plaster and metal aluminum tile)
2 - wheelbarrows @ $53.00 - $106.00
Approximate total cost
of Phase #1: $3,110.40
250.00
300.00
106.00
$3,766.40
Employees would be required to wear hard hats and safety goggles
at all times during -this operation.
NOTE:
Phase #2 would be presented to the Commissioners at a later
date if Phase #1 is successful.
it must be noted that some large rooms would not be -touched in
Phase #2 such as the existing kitchen area, este.
Also, with over 225- ceiling (room) areas of acoustical tile:
and plaster ceilings, we can determine which rooms need to be accessible
to piping above after all corridors have been completed.
ROTE•
All light fixutres will re:main,.so as not to create a hardship
on the general contractoft electrician in having to run temporary
construction lighting.
J kJ li 201979 BOOK 41 PAGE 24
P
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE DEMOLITION OF THE CORRIDOR
CEILINGS IN PHASE #1 OF THE RENOVATION OF THE HOSPITAL COMPLEX.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE KONTOULAS NEXT BROUGHT
BEFORE THE BOARD THE.FOLLOWING LIST OF BOILERS, WHICH HE REQUESTED BE
CONSIDERED FOR SALE:
t _ C0 mT) )14 1;,%A i ilL ?0P #,q., 5 tb,t c..1--9 v41
-57011:114) C--HEmt<YlL- :5y'57am,� � G�
16-0 # i5TE'jq..m i4r.0p�mS
NY� w r H Tay" Y).
L4 p 0 v v. C �}-> �`� ® T P.a 6 ` 'f--'2.. F fi' l �; V- 1)
�14) I- Eq- L,7
25
JUN 2 01979 Boa - 41 F' ` 25
N i ppl—o-
qt�7
s � .
25
JUN 2 01979 Boa - 41 F' ` 25
1®, 4 FT
!os i V-1 r
9..m .
i3ONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESE^.TATIVE KONTOULAS INFORMED THE
BOARD THAT HE VERIFIED TWICE WITH JIM PENICK, A MECHANICAL ENGINEER WITH
CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY, THE FACT THAT THESE ITEMS WILL NOT BE INCORPORATED
IN THE NEW DESIGN AND, THEREFORE, ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE. HE THEN ASKED
THE BOARD ABOUT THE DISPOSAL OF USED FURNITURE AND LAB EQUIPMENT AND
WAS ADVISED THAT IT WAS AN ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE WORKSHOP MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1979,
WITH THE CONSULTANTS FROM CONNELL, METCALF AND EDDY REGARDING THE DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT WE OUGHT TO HAVE A HOLD=BACK
IN THE CONTRACT OF 5% OR SO FOR A STATED PERIOD OF TIME, WHICH ASPECT
WAS NOT DISCUSSED AT THE WORKSHOP MEETING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY INSTRUCTED THE ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH THE
CONTRACT BASED UPON THE WORKSHOP MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1979.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE TERMINATION OF
TREASURE COVE SUBDIVISION SEWER FRANCHISE AND NOTED THAT THIS SHOULD BE
ADVERTISED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH
THE TERMINATION OF THE TREASURE COVE SUBDIVISION SEWER FRANCHISE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THERE ARE 6 OR 7 HAZARDOUS STRUC-
TURES TO BE REVIEWED BY THE BOARD AND REQUESTED THAT THIS MATTER BE
PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD A SUIT BEING BROUGHT
AGAINST THE COUNTY AND HAROLD WHITAKER, AND STATED THAT IF HE IS AUTHOR-
IZED TO DEFEND THIS SUIT, IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS EXTRA SERVICES.
26
J U N 2 01979 BOOK 41 FACE 26
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY COLLINS TO REPRESENT
THE COUNTY AND HAROLD WHITAKER AS AN AGENT FOR THE COUNTY; THIS
REPRESENTATION TO BE CONSIDERED AS EXTRA'SERVICES FOR THE ATTORNEY,
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD
ADD AN ITEM TO TODAY IS AGENDA CONCERNING PHASE TWO OF THE GIFFORD SYSTEM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED THE EMERGENCY ITEM REQUESTED BY THE
COORDINATOR TO THE AGENDA.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS PROCEEDED TO EXPLAIN THAT
HE NEEDS AUTHORITY TO BORROW $52,500 FROM THE FIRST CITRUS BANK FOR PHASE
TWO OF THE GIFFORD SYSTEM. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNT AUTHORIZED
BY THE BOARD SOME MONTHS AGO WAS $402,500, BUT EACH NOTE MUST BE APPROVED
INDIVIDUALLY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE $52,500 NOTE FOR PHASE TWO OF THE
GIFFORD SYSTEM AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS NEXT DISCUSSED EXTENSION OF THE BICYCLE
PATH ALONG 6TH AVENUE AND STATED THAT THE COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT
CAN PUT THE BASE IN AT AN ESTIMATED COST OF $6,990 FOR 1,165` OF SIDE-
WALK BASE. HE -ADVISED THAT TED TYSON OF DICKERSON, INC., WILL BE•PUTTING
IN THE ASPHALT, AND THAT THE MONEY FOR THIS PROJECT WILL BE TAKEN FROM
THE 14ATERIALS ACCOUNT.
ON flOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED WITH
THE BICYCLE PATH ON 6TH AVENUE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $7,OOO.
.DUNE KRAGH, A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROPERTY.OWNERS ASSOCIATION
OF ROCKRIDGE, APPEARED AND THANKED THE BOARD FOR THEIR ACTION,
ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT AT THE LAST MEETING, THE BOARD
DISCUSSED THE APPROACH TO THE ISSUE OF FRANK ZORC`S APPEAL REGARDING THE
SITE PLAN OF TROPIC GROVE, AND THE ATTORNEY AT THAT TIME GAVE THE OPINION
THAT MR. ZORC WAS NOT A PERSON WHO PROPERLY CAME WITHIN THE REALM TO
BRING FORTH THIS APPEAL. HE CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD WAS AWARE OF PROB-
LEMS IN THE SITE PLAN, AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THE DEVELOPER OF TROPIC
GROVE CONSIDER THE PROBLEM AND COME BACK BEFORE THE BOARD TODAY WITH SOME
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS, THE ATTORNEY THEN ASKED THE DEVELOPER IF HE HAD
ANY COMMENTS.
27
JUN 201979
BOOK 41 PAGE 27
J
a
ATTORNEY GORDON .JOHNSTON APPEARED REPRESENTING MR. BELL,
DEVELOPER OF TROPIC GROVES. HE STATED THAT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE IN
THE SITE PLAN, WHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED, AND THEY DO FEEL THEY
HAVE A VALID SITE PLAN. ATTORNEY .JOHNSTON NOTED THAT FROM A TECHNICAL
STANDPOINT, THEY WISH TO BE COOPERATIVE WITH THE BOARD, AND IN ORDER
TO EXPEDITE HIS CLIENT `S PLANS, THEY WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO HAVE THE
BOARD LISTEN TO THE APPEAL. HE FIRMLY STATED THAT BY NOT OBJECTING TO
THE BOARD'S LISTENING TO MR. ZORC`S APPEAL, THEY ARE NOT, IN ANY WAY,
ACKNOWLEDGING THAT MR, ZORC HAS A LEGAL INTEREST TO BRING FORTH THIS
APPEAL.
ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THIS WILL NOT BE A PUBLIC
HEARING AND WILL NOT HAVE TO BE ADVERTISED, BUT THERE SHOULD BE A TIME
SET SO THOSE INTERESTED IN THE APPEAL CAN BE PRESENT,
ATTORNEY DANIEL KILBRIDE, WHO REPRESENTS FRANK ZORC IN THIS
MATTER, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY WERE INTERESTED IN HAVING THIS
MATTER RESOLVED AND WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEM IN THE APPEAL BEING REVIEWED
AT THE BOARD'S NEXT MEETING. HE ASKED ABOUT THE REVISED PLAN BEING SUB-
MITTED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW.
COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD EXPECTS TO GET
COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND THE CHAIRMAN INFORMED ATTORNEY
KILBRIDE THAT A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WILL BE
IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE DISCUSSION REGARDING THE REVISED SITE PLAN AND THE
APPEAL.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STRESSED THAT SINCE ALL CONCERNED PARTIES
WERE PRESENT, HE DID NOT WANT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO.HAVE DAILY.
VISITS ASKING ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE TROPIC GROVE PLAN.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS THEN ASKED PLANNING DIRECTOR DAVID REVER
IF HE DOES HAVE THE REVISED PLAN IN ORDER FOR HIS DEPARTMENT TO BE ABLE
TO MAKE COMMENTS AT THE ,JULY 5TH MEETING, AND THE PLANNER REPLIED AFFIRMA-
TIVELY.
ANN ROBINSON, A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE AUDUBON•SOCIETY, STATED
THAT THE SOCIETY WAS CONCERNED OVER THE ATTORNEY`S INTERPRETATION WHICH
DENIED.-, THE RIGHT OF ANYONE OTHER THAN A CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNER TO
APPEAL IF THEY FEEL A SITE PLAN IS DEFECTIVE.
28
JUN 2 01979 1 mox .41 PACE 28
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT SUPPORT MR. ZORC'S
RIGHT TO APPEAL, AND STATED THAT HE'WILL VOTE FOR IT ONLY BECAUSE THE
LEGAL OWNER HAS NO OBJECTION. HE CONTINUED THAT BASICALLY HE DISAGREES
WITH THE AUDUBON SOCIETY'S POSITION; ALTHOUGH, HE AGREES IN PRINCIPLE TO
SOME EXTENT, THE CHAIRMAN POINTED OUT THAT IF ANYONE WERE ABLE TO COME
IN AND QUESTION ALL THE VARIOUS SITE PLANS, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT COULD
BE SWAMPED WITH REQUESTS FOR EXPLANATIONS REGARDING DRAINAGE, ETC., AND
HE FELT IT WOULD BE UNWORKABLE, HE WAS HOPEFUL THAT WE COULD ADDRESS
THE PROBLEM AND FELT THE BOARD MIGHT HAVE TO REWORD THE ORDINANCE TO
GIVE A LITTLE MORE LATITUDE AS TO WHO ACTUALLY HAS LEGAL INTEREST IN A
SITE PLAN,
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED HEARING THE APPEAL OF THE SITE
PLAN FOR TROPIC GROVE, AS CONSENTED TO BY THE DEVELOPER; THE HEARING TO
BE SET AT 11:00 O'CLOCK A.M. AT THE MEETING OF .JULY 5, 1979,
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HIS POSITION IS LOCKED IN WITH
THE TERM "LEGAL INTEREST" BEING DEFINED AS THE PERSON WHO OWNS THE LAND,
THE ATTORNEY ADVISED THAT ATTORNEY KILBRIDE HAS WRITTEN AN OPINION CITING
OTHER LANGUAGE, SUCH AS "ACCREDITED PERSONS WITH LEGALLY RECOGNIZABLE
INTEREST." HE SUGGESTED THAT IF THE BOARD WOULD BE HEARING APPEALS FOR
PARTIES OTHER THAN THE LAND OWNERS, THEN THE WORDING OF THE ORDINANCE
SHOULD BE CHANGED.
COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT THIS SHOULD BE REMEDIED AS IT
REALLY IS THE CRUX OF THIS SITUATION, AND STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO
HAVE ATTORNEY COLLINS SEE WHAT CHANGES COULD BE MADE TO CORRECT THIS.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY OOMMISSSIONER
SIEBERT, TO HAVE THE ATTORNEY EXPLORE THE REWORDING OF THE ORDINANCE
AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION AS TO THE COMMISSIONERS' ACTIONS SO THE BOARD
CAN REVIEW IT AT THEIR OWN VOLITION.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT WE HAVE A DEVELOPER WHO ALREADY
HAS AN APPROVED SITE PLAN IN WHICH A PROBLEM HAS ARISEN, AND IT IS ONLY
BECAUSE OF HIS EXTREME COOPERATION THAT THE BOARD CAN GET -THIS STRAIGHTENED
OUT,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT -WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
29
JUN 2 01979 BOOK .41 PAGE Z9
THE BOARD NEXT CONSIDERED THE BRIDGE INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AS PROPOSED BY SVERDRUP & PARCEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
AND BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (A .JOINT VENTURE).
JOHN ROBBINS OF THE .JOINT VENTURE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE
WAS ADVISED BY THE DOT BRIDGE DEPARTMENT IN FORT LAUDERDALE THAT THE
STATE HAS PREPARED AN INVENTORY LIST WHICH INDICATES THAT 11 OF THE
BRIDGES FORMERLY OWNED BY THE STATE NOW HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO THE COUNTY AS
THEIR RESPONSIBILITY. THIS BRING THE TOTAL BRIDGES FOR WHICH THE COUNTY
IS RESPONSIBLE TO 88, HE WENT ON TO EXPLAIN THAT THERE ARE FOUR INDE-
PENDENT BRIDGES IN THE WABASSO STRUCTURE, AND THEY PLACED A LUMP SUM OF
$11,000 IN THEIR PROPOSED CONTRACT TO COVER THIS INSPECTION, MR. ROBBINS
CONTINUED THAT THEY WILL FOLLOW THE STATE'S COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE, AND
EACH STRUCTURE WILL HAVE TO BE PHYSICALLY MEASURED. HE EXPLAINED THAT
THEY WILL WORK IN TWO 3 -MAN TEAMS, MR. ROBBINS STATED THAT COLLIER COUNTY
AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ARE UNIQUE IN THAT THE DOT ORIGINALLY PERFORMED
ALL THE BRIDGE INSPECTIONS IN THESE COUNTIES, BUT OVER THE YEARS THE
STATE HAS BEEN DELETING SOME OF THE BRIDGES, HE NOTED THAT, IN SOME
CASES, EVEN THOUGH THE ROAD BELONGS TO THE STATE, THE BRIDGE STILL WOULD
BE THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS COMMENTED THAT THE STATE IS TAKING, 27TH
AVENUE AND PUTTING IT ON THE SECONDARY ROAD STATUS.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THE COUNTY MIGHT WANT TO ARGUE WITH
THE STATE ON A BRIDGE OR TWO AND NOT TAKE WHAT THEY WANT TO GIVE US.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THE STATE HAD INDICATED ON THEIR
RECORDS WHEN THE BRIDGES WERE LAST INSPECTED, AND MR. ROBBINS REPLIED
AFFIRMATIVELY. HE STATED THAT HE REQUESTED COPIES OF THE RECORDS OF ALL
THE BRIDGES FOR WHICH THE COUNTY IS RESPONSIBLE AND WAS ADVISED THAT
WHEN THE STATE MOVED THEIR FACILITIES A YEAR AGO, PARS" OF THESE RECORDS
WERE LOST OR MISPLACED. MR, ROBBINS STATED THAT IF A LIST OF BRIDGES
IS SUBMITTED TO THE STATE, THEY WILL MAKE AN ATTEMPT TO GO BACK THROUGH
THEIR FILES AND TRY TO LOCATE THE RECORDS,
DISCUSSION WAS HELD ABOUT THE INSPECTION OF THE WABASSO BRIDGE
THAT WAS MADE IN 1978, AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT THE SLAB
SHIFTED ON THE BRIDGE AND IT WAS CORRECTED; AN UPDATED REPORT WAS REQUESTED
BUT NEVER RECEIVED,
COMMISSIONER Loy WONDERED WHY, IF THE DOT HAD MADE INSPECTIONS
30
JUN 201979
BOOK 41 pAcE 30
1
IN 1978, IT WAS IMPERATIVE THAT THE COUNTY ALSO MAKE INSPECTIONS.
JAR. ROBBINS EXPLAINED THAT AN INSPECTION IS REQUIRED YEARLY,
AND WHEN THE COUNTY SUBMITS THEIR REQUEST FOR FEDERAL FUNDS, IT MUST
HAVE A TYPE Z FORMAT ON THE COMPREHENSIVE INSPECTION REPORT. HE NOTED
THAT IF A BRIDGE HAS A CERTAIN RATING, AN UPDATED INSPECTION MAY BE
MADE ONLY EVERY TWO YEARS; THE CONDITION OF THE BRIDGE DETERMINES THE
FREQUENCY OF THE INSPECTION. HE THEN DISPLAYED A LIST OF BRIDGES FOR
WHICH THE COUNTY IS RESPONSIBLE.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS COMMENTED THAT WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO
MOVE ALONG WITH THE OVERALL INSPECTION OF ALL THE -BRIDGES.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED REGARDING THE COST OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
INSPECTIONS FOR ALL THE BRIDGES.
RALPH ENG OF THE .JOINT VENTURE EXPLAINED THAT THEY WILL BE
SPENDING QUITE A BIT OF -TIME ON THE BRIDGES THAT ARE THE COUNTY'S RESPONSI-
BILITY. HE CONTINUED THAT SOME OF THE BRIDGES WHICH ARE ZO' OR LESS
WILL NOT REQUIRE A COMPREHENSIVE INSPECTION. THEY WILL JUST BE IDENTIFIED
AND GIVEN A SHORT REPORT. PSR. ENG STATED THAT THEY EXPECT TO PLUS OR
MINUS $10,000 OR $15,000 FOR THE INSPECTION, DEPENDING ON WHAT THEY MAY
FIND.
SIR. ROBBINS THEN DISPLAYED A COPY OF THE STRUCTURE INVENTORY
AND APPRAISAL REPORT WHICH WILL STATE THE -NET COST OF IMPROVEMENTS, AND
PtNCH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL USE FOR THEIR AUDIT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED WHY THE .JOINT VENTURE'S PAYMENT
SCHEDULE WAS DIFFERENT FROM THE WAY WE HAVE WORKED WITH THEM IN THE PAST.
SIR. ENG COMMENTED THAT THEY ARE WILLING.TO DO THIS ON A LUMP
SUM BASIS, BUT IF THE COUNTY DESIRES, THEY WOULD DO THIS ON A COST PLUS
FACTOR, NOT TO EXCEED THESE FIGURES.
PAIR. BEINDORF FELT IT WOULD BE WISE FOR THE BOARD TO.DO IT ON A
TIME AND MATERIAL BASIS, BUT STATED THAT THE .JOINT VENTURE WOULD BE
HAPPY TO DQ IT EITHER WAY, THOUGH THEY WOULD WANT A MAXIMUM FIGURE SET.
DISCUSSION WAS HELD ABOUT THE LAST SENTENCE OF SECTION 5A IN
THE PROPOSED CONTRACT, UNDER THE HEADING "OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS," AND
.ENGINEER BEINDORF EXPLAINED THAT IF THE COUNTY USES THESE DOCUMENTS AS
A -SAMPLE TO ANOTHER ENGINEERING FIRM, THEY PREFER TO HAVE THEIR NAME
REMOVED.
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
31
JUN 2 01979 41 p"I'la 31
P
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH THE
.JOINT VENTURE ON BRIDGE INSPECTION ON'A COST PLUS SITUATION, USING
-$77,920 AS AN UP -SHOT FIGURE FOR THE 88 BRIDGES, AND $11,000 FOR THE
WABASSO BRIDGE, AND PUTTING A TEMPORARY HOLD ON THE WABASSO BRIDGE.
SAID CONTRACT WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN FULLY
EXECUTED.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS ASKED PERMISSION TO ADD DISCUSSION OF
THE RELOCATION OF THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT IN GIFFORD TO THE AGENDA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE EMERGENCY ITEM REQUESTED BY ADMINISTRA-
TOR JENNINGS TO TODAY'S AGENDA.
.JOHN ROBBINS, OF THE .JOINT VENTURE, NOTED THAT THEY HAD RE-
CEIVED AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT THE RELOCATION OF THE SEWAGE PLANT
FROM ITS PRESENT SITE TO KINGS HIGHWAY. (THE DEVELOPER WHO DONATED THIS
PLANT NEEDS THE LAND AND REQUESTED THE PLANT BE MOVED.) HE STATED THAT
THEY PUT THIS JOB OUT FOR BID AND ESTIMATED A COST OF BETWEEN $10,000
TO $20,000 FOR THE RELOCATION. THEY RECEIVED A LOW -BID OF $11,009 FROM
ASHTON UTILITIES OF FORT PIERCE, WITH THE SECOND LOWEST BEING $16,900
FROM SUNSHINE UTILITY EQUIPMENT.' THIS COST IS INCLUDED AS PART OF THE
.JOINT VENTURE'S SERVICES, MR. ROBBINS NOTED THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO
CALL FOR BIDS ON REINSTALLATION OF THE PLANT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT SOME OF THE PERISHABLE PORTIONS
OF THE PLANT ARE IN STORAGE AND ASKED IF THEY NEEDED COMMISSION APPROVAL
TO GET THEM OUT OF STORAGE. MR. ROBBINS RESPONDED THAT EVENTUALLY THEY
WILL, BUT NOT AT THIS TIME.
MR. ROBBINS THEN DISTRIBUTED TO THE BOARD THE PROPOSED SCOPE
OF WORK FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PEBBLE BAY AREA SEWAGE COLLECTION AND
PUMPING SYSTEM FOR CONNECTION TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH SEWERAGE SYSTEM,
A COPY OF WHICH IS MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES, AS FOLLOWS:
32
J U N 2 0 1979 Bao .41 PAUE 3Z
ft
PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO PEBBLE BAY AREA
SEWAGE COLLECTION AND PUMPING SYSTEM
FOR
CONNECTION TO CITY OF VERO BEACH SEWERAGE SYSTEM
Prepared By:
SVERDRUP & PARCEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
A JOINT VENTURE
June 20, 1979
JUN 2 01979 BOOK 41 FAvE 33
a
M.
The following Scope of Work defines the items necessary to evaluate the
sewage collection and pumping system in the Pebble Bay area for the
purpose of connection to the City of Vero Beach Sewerage System.
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Obtain all as -built drawings and records of the sewage colaection and
pumping system. (Some of this information has been obtained in con-
junction with sewage treatment plant study.)
2. Review all drawings and records for completeness.
3. Determine standards required by the City of Vero Beach for connection to
City's system.
4. Perform a comprehensive inventory of the collection and pumping system
to include field checking of all drawings and records. Items observed
during field inventory will be noted on drawings. The comprehensive
inventory will include:
a. Inspection of all components of the five pumping stations in the
service area. Pump, motors, piping and all electrical components
will be inspected and conditions noted. The wet wells will be
'inspected and all dimensions determined.
b. Inspection of all manholes to determine if any leaks exist or if
any hydraulic problems exist.
c. Perform T.V. camera inspection of gravity collection system as re-
quired by the City of Vero Beach.
5. Review and analyze all field data.
6. Evaluate entire system to determine the following:
a. Number of connections in service area.
b. Potential number of new connections in service area, including pro-
posed'Indian Sumner development.
c. Maximum projected sewage flow in service area.
d. Capacity of existing pumping stations. A determination of any
hydraulic deficiencies associated with wet well size or pump
capacities.
e. Determine the master pump station and force main requirements to
tie into the City of Vero Beach's system at A -1-A and Silver
Shores Road.
f. Determination of improvements required to bring system up to
acceptable standards.
g. Preparation of construction cost estimate for required improve-
ments.
7. Perform cost sharing analysis for required improvements.
a
8. Prepare a report of the findings of this study and submit ten (10)
copies of the report to the County.
9. Anticipated time schedule for completion of this study is approximately
8 to 12 weeks. However, this time schedule is pendina.availability of
data and scheduling of T.V. sewer line inspection.
JUN 2 01979 BOOK 41 mr- 34
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT HOPED THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO THIS
STUDY AND LATER FIND OUT THAT WE CANNOT HOOK UP TO THE CITY SYSTEM.
MR. ROBBINS REPORTED THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS VERY PRELIMIN-
ARY BUT THAT ELLIOT GROSH OF THE CITY UTILITY DEPARTMENT INFORMED HIM
THAT THE CITY HAS DISCUSSED THIS MATERIAL IN REGARD TO THE POSSIBILITY
OF TYING IN THE PEBBLE BAY SERVICE AREA TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH SYSTEM.
HE CONTINUED THAT SEVERAL THINGS WOULD BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY, INCLUD-
ING A TV CAMERA INSPECTION AND REPORT, MR, ROBBINS STRESSED THAT HIS
DISCUSSION WITH MR. GROSH WAS UNOFFICIAL, BUT FELT THE CITY WOULD BE
WILLING TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE COUNTY ON THE ALLOCATION. HE STATED THAT
THE COUNTY WOULD BE A WHOLESALE CUSTOMER AT THE CONNECTION POINT, WHICH
WOULD BE AT AIA AND SILVER SHORES ROAD, JUST SOUTH OF THE PEBBLE PAY AREA,
MR. ROBBINS REPORTED THAT THERE IS AN EASEMENT COMING OUT OF PEBBLE BAY
WHERE THE CITY HAS.A WATER LINE, AND WE MAY RUN A FORCE MAIN THERE, WHICH
WOULD ELIMINATE THE ACQUISITION OF A DOT PERMIT. HE CONTINUED THAT IT
WAS INDICATED THAT THE CITY MAY REQUIRE THE COUNTY TO PAY A PRO -RATA SHARE
OF THE FORCE MAIN CONNECTION; THE LINE HAS DEPRECIATED IN VALUE SO IT
WOULD BE A PRO -RATA SHARE OF THE DEPRECIATED VALUE OF THE LINE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT THIS LOOKS AS IF IT IS IN THE
BALL PARK OF GETTING DONE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP ON GOING.
MR. ROBBINS REPORTED THAT A HYDROLOGICAL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN
PERFORMED IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA; THEREFORE, NO FURTHER ENGINEERING
STUDIES WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE.
140TION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER LYONS, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK AS RECOMMENDED BY
THE JOINT VENTURE.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS ASKED THE FINANCE DIRECTOR
IF THE COUNTY WAS COLLECTING BILLS FROM THAT AREA AND WHETHER IT INVOLVED
AN ENTERPRISE ACCOUNT.
FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON REPLIED THAT THIS IS NOT AN ENTERPRISE
ACCOUNT, AND SINCE THIS IS UNANTICIPATED REVENUE, IT WAS PLACED ON A
HOLD PATTERN.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON VARIOUS ITEMS MENTIONED IN THE SCOPE
OF WORK, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT ITEM 7, WHICH STATES, "PERFORM COST
SHARING ANALYSIS FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS" WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE A CERTAIN
IMPACT ON INDIAN SUMMER.
35
JUN 2 01979 BOOK 41 F`�E 5
P
MR. ROBBINS STATED THAT THE SCOPE OF WORK IS GOING TO BE BASED
ON THE AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION, "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS, ENGINEERING,
TV INSPECTION, ETC., AND THE .JOINT VENTURE WOULD DO A COST SHARING
ANALYSIS THAT THE COUNTY WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR. HE CONTINUED THAT,
DEPENDING ON THE INFORMATION AND THE LENGTH OF TIME REQUIRED FOR INSPEC-
TION, THEY ESTIMATE BETWEEN $8,000 TO $10,000 WHICH THEY WILL PERFORM
AS ADDITIONAL SERVICES ON AN ON-GOING CONTRACT, HE FELT THIS WOULD TAKE
FROM 8 TO 12 WEEKS TO ACCOMPLISH.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE FELT THE BOARD SHOULD KNOW
DOLLARWISE WHERE THEY STAND BEFORE THE ENGINEERING WORK IS COMMENCED AND
THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY MUST BE DETERMINED AND FORMALLY APPROVED
BY BOTH -THE CITY AND THE COUNTY; OTHERWISE, THE REPORT MAY BE FOR NOTHING.
HE SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE COMMISSIONER LYONS TO WRITE THE
CITY OF VERO BEACH REQUESTING SERVICE FOR THIS AREA AND ASKING WHAT THEIR
REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WITHDREW HIS MOTION AND COMMISSIONER
LYONS WITHDREW HIS SECOND.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE BROUGHT UP THE 150,000 GPD. SET ASIDE FOR
INDIAN RIVER SHORES AND THE 50,000 GPD FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA BETWEEN
THE TOWN AND THE CITY LIMITS. HE ASKED IF THE JOINT VENTURE WAS GOING
TO STUDY THE FRANCHISE AREA.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO DISMANTLING THE PLANT AND
PUTTING THOSE WHO ARE SERVED BY THE PLANT ON THE VERO BEACH SYSTEM,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED COMMISSIONER LYONS TO ASK THE CITY
OF VERO BEACH TO SERVICE THAT AREA PRESENTLY ON THE SEWER SYSTEM BETWEEN
THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN RIVER SHORES.
JOHN ROBBINS, OF THE .JOINT VENTURE, THEN DISCUSSED WITH THE
BOARD THE FOLLOWING LETTER REGARDING THE PEBBLE BAY SEWAGE PLANT RENO-
VATIONS:
36
J u N . 2 01979 . Boos 41 Fnf 36
JACK G JF NNINGS. Administrator
f
April 24, 1979
P
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLIAM C. WODTKE. JR.. Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.
EDWIN S. SCNMUCKER
R. DON DEESON
2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32060
Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc.
and Beindorf and Associates, Inc.,
A Joint Venture
Post Office Box 849
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Attention: Mr: James L. Beindorf
Re: Pebble Bay Sewage Plant
Renovations
Dear Mr. Beindorf: '
This letter will serve as your authorization to proceed on the various items of
work as discussed with.you yesterday with your Mr. John Robbins, Neil Nelson, and
the writer. We understand that your projected engineering fees would not exceed
$1,200.00 and, if in any case they were to exceed this amount, that you would not
do any further work without written authorization from this office. We understand
that you will do the following:
1. Coordinate required analysis of raw wastewater and coordinate analytical
work required for process control, e.g., MLVSS and dissolved oxygen deter-
minations. Actual analytical work to be paid for by County.
2. Coordinate elevation determinations of all tankage and pertinent transfer
pipes. County personnel will perform actual survey work.
3. Based on raw wastewater analysis, you will prepare a process design which
will outline operational control parameter ranges.
4. Provide consultation services to County operating personnel for process
control and analysis of all analytical data.
5. Perform inspection of physical modifications to treatment plant and provide
consultation services for required modifications.
6. Serve as project management for improvements to treatment unit and coordinate
. all activities through the County Administrator's office.
By this letter, you are instructed Lo proceed as soon as possible in order that we
may bring this plant into full service.
Very .truly yours,
Jack C. Jennings
County Administrator
JUS 2 0 1979 Boa 41 PACE 37
MR. ROBBINS STATED THAT THERE ARE MANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE
PLANT, AND IT NEEDS TO BE PUT IN OPERATING ORDER SO AS NOT TO RECEIVE
A CITATION FROM THE DER. HE ESTIMATED THAT IT WOULD TAKE $4,000 TO
$5,000 WORTH OF WORK TO PUT THE PLANT BACK INTO OPERATION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE EMERGENCY ACTION TAKEN BY
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORIZING THE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE PEBBLE BAY PLANT.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NEXT DISCUSSED THE PROPOSALS MADE BY DEAN LUETHJE
AND MR, WILSON REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT HIBISCUS AIRPORT THIS
MORNING, WHICH INCLUDED THE POSSIBILITY OF PUTTING IN A TEST WELL TO
DETERMINE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF WATER AT THAT SITE. THE CHAIRMAN
CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE CONSULTANTS LOOK INTO
THIS, DETERMINE WHAT THE COST OF THE TRANSMISSION LINE WOULD BE, IF IT
WERE ACCEPTABLE, AND WHETHER THE MID -FLORIDA UTILITIES PLANT WOULD TAKE
THE 700,000 GPD.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE AND COMMISSIONER DEESON
WOULD GET TOGETHER WITH THE CONSULTANTS TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER.
MR.-BEINDORF NEXT DISCUSSED SETTING A DATE AT THE NEXT MEETING
FOR A WORKSHOP CONCERNING THE DRAINAGE STUDY FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY IN-
VOLVING THE AREA SOUTH OF ROCKRIDG'E.
DISCUSSION WAS HELD CONCERNING SITE PLAN BEING AMENDED IN THE
6TH AVENUE AREA,
MR. BEINDORF STATED THAT ANY IMPROVEMENTS MADE WILL HAVE TO
BE APPROVED BY THREE AGENCIES, AND SOME OF THEM COULD BE AFFECTED BY
THE SITE PLAN BEING AMENDED.
ANN ROBINSON ASKED IF THE BOARD WOULD GIVE THE PLANNING &
ZONING COMMISSION SOME DIRECTION.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT WE ARE NOW WAITING FOR
REPORTS FROM EACH OF THE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING
WE HAD REGARDING DRAINAGE IN THE ROCKRIDGE AREA, AND WHEN WE GET THE
INPUT REQUESTED FROM THEM, IT WILL BE EVALUATED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE
SO THE BOARD CAN THEN MAKE SOME DECISION. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED
THAT WE MUST GET PERMITS FROM THE AGENCIES PLUS GET IN TOUCH WITH
LANDOWNERS.
38
om
BOOK 41 PAGE 38
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THE BOARD CONCURS WITH THE
DECISION OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION TO TAKE NO ACTION ON SITE
PLANS FOR ONE MONTH AND DID NOT FEEL A MORATORIUM IS NECESSARY.
COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED.
ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS REQUESTED THAT AN EMERGENCY ITEM IN
REGARD TO ROAD RESURFACING AND PAVING PROJECTS BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA,
ON POTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED THE EMERGENCY ITEM REQUESTED BY THE
ADMINISTRATOR TO THE AGENDA.
THE BOARD THEN REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LIST SUBMITTED BY THE
ADMINISTRATOR:
ROAD PAVING PROJECTS
C -.Roads Need Re -surfacing
Name Location
Cost
Distance
5,016
L.F.
.95
Glendale from U.S. 1 to Kings Hwy.
$ 77,570
17,952
L.F.
3.4
Mi.
16th Street from U.S. i to 20th Ave.
21,674
5,016
L.F.
.95
Mi.
S. Winter Beach -Kings Hwy. to Lat A
20,533
4,752
L.F
.9
Mi.
510 - U.S. 1 to 512
125,481
29,040
L.F.
5.5
Mi.
58th Ave - 8th St. to 1st St.'S.W.
22,815
5,280
L.F.
1.
Mi.
Total
$268,073
3,168
L.F
.6
Mi.
NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
Soil Cement & Cap
Rebel Road - 27th Ave to 43rd Ave $ 50,535(22,815)5,280 L.F. 1. Mi.
35th.Ave - 12th St. to 14th St.,
City Limits 10,107 1,056 L.F. .2 Mi.
Total $ 60,642
County & S/D Streets Re -surfacing
Citrus -
27th Ave to 43rd
$ 21,674
5,016
L.F.
.95
Mi.
Vickers
Rd. U.S. 1 to RR
4,563
1,056
L.F.
.2
Mi.
Fresard
Glendale 16-17=18 Ave.
5,704 ea.
1,320
L.F.
10th Ave
- Citrus to S. Relief
Canal 14,830
3,432
L.F.
.65
Mi.
13th Ave
- 8th St. to 6th St.
5,704
1,320
L.F.
.25
Mi.
30th St
- U.S. 1 to Golf Course
Br. 13,689
3,168
L.F
.6
Mi.
12th St.
- U.S. 1 E. to 6th Ave
5,133
1,188
L.F.
.225
Mi.
26th St.
- 43rd to 58th Ave
22,815
5,280
L.F.
1.
Mi.
Pebble Bay - All Streets
15,970
3.696
L.F:
.7
Mi.
Citrus -
43rd Ave to Rangeline
Rd. 63,881
14,780
L.F.
2.8
Mi.
$185,371.
Grand Total
$514,086
31
JUN 2 01979 Boa 41 F'A,uE 39
A
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS POINTED OUT THAT THE REBEL ROAD ITEM -
HAS A FIGURE OF $22,815 IN PARENTHESIS, AND EXPLAINED THAT THIS IS FOR
A 1" TYPE 2 WEARING SURFACE WHICH HE IS RECOMMENDING BE USED.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE RESOLUTION THAT PERTAINS TO
PROPERTY OWNERS WANTING TO HAVE THEIR ROADS PAVED.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT IF PROPERTY OWNERS WANT
TO HAVE THEIR ROADS PAVED, THE COUNTY WILL DO THE ENGINEERING, PREPARATION,
AND TESTING, AND WILL PAY 25% OF THE ASPHALT; THEN THE PROPERTY OWNERS
WILL SPLIT THE COST WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ROAD RESURFACING AND PAVING
PROJECT AS PRESENTED BY THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE 1" TYPE SURFACE
BEING USED ON REBEL ROAD,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED CONCERNING THE WALKWAYS AND PAVING AT
WABASSO BEACH.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING THE WABASSO BEACH PAVING TO THE
ROAD PAVING PROJECT.
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING LETTER PERTAINING TO
SALARY INCREASES:
40
J U -N -2 01979 BOOK .41 FACE 40
J
R1ANAGE'AF"IT C'ONSUL'TANTS
N.0.14 �YTUT.
BN lbt'11 b,1 "'►
Franklin St. 3t15 ,Ick 11ri� t•
141h, rjrd. l''ia. 3.iaQl
131 s) 6' G R�!11 C4DCod D at'lr. Fla
(30r4 783:17211
June 6. 1979
Mr. Robert Donlon
Personnel Director
Indian River County
tler-o Reach, Florida
Dear Mr. Donlon:
In answer to the fol Iowipq q,lestinrrs that you Proposed
to mr!: "What is the intent of the Cody Stuc!y that when the ch,rrir•s
ill ttie pay plan, were implemented, at this time there should he no
cost of living incrcase considered at the end of budget year."
It Was the intent of our rocommeml�'tians that i irlelr(=nta: ton
woa,l! be Separate and apart from anv additional cr5t of living
intreases that Would he considered in the r.;uiinU fiscal Vear•.
It was r•ecniamended in our -presentation that t:I tin a cost of 1•ivirjr,
inf-"11Se is '(liven" in this rrcyt fi..C,ll year, th-2 Salary ranges that
wry hav4i° rec.ou,rnl�nde(I t -could rlut have to be adjusted. In othtrr wt,r'ds,
the increases Would be coven within the recos„nended ranges.
I hope this will answer the above question.
Sincerely,
i %Z '.. �,['L, 1. t •• �-- �.. .
t�. E. Pellegrin
CODY S ASSCCIAT S, INC.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED SALARY INCREASES
FOR THE 1979-50 BUDGET YEAR.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT NOTHING IS DONE ON THE COST OF
LIVING, AND WITHIN A PERIOD OF TWO TO THREE YEARS, YOU MUST REEVALUATE
AND MAKE POSSIBLE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE RANGES. HE FELT. THAT WHEN WE GO
TO.OUR NEXT YEAR, WE -WOULD BE ADDRESSING INCREASES IN OUR PAYROLL, ALSO
BRINGING PEOPLE INTO RANGE. HE STATED THAT WHEN WE WENT INTO THE PLAN,
THE SALARIES WERE TO BE ADJUSTED; NOW WE ARE TALKING OF AN ADDITIONAL
INCREASE.
JUN 2 01979 Boa 41 PAGE 41
J
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DONLON APPROACHED THE BOARD AND EXPLAINED
THAT THEY SET THE SALARY RANGES AS RECOMMENDED ON PAGE 10 OF THE CODY
REPORT. HE CONTINUED THAT STARTING ON PAGE 18, THERE ARE FOUR PAGES
WHICH DEAL WITH THE COST OF LIVING, AND THIS COST OF LIVING DATA SHOULD
BE USED IN MAKING LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS IN FUTURE YEARS, MR. DONLON .FURTHER
NOTED THAT AT THE BOARD MEETING ON APRIL 4TH, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT
WHEN A GENERAL INCREASE WAS GIVEN THIS YEAR, IT WOULD NOT IN ANY WAY
AFFECT THE SALARY RANGES, WHICH WOULD REMAIN THE SAME AS WHEN ADOPTED
THE FIRST OF JUNE. THESE PAY RANGES SHOULD LAST TWO YEARS OR MORE.
MR. DONLON THEN READ FROM THE .JUNE 6TH MINUTES AND QUOTED COMMISSIONER
LYONS, WHO STATED THAT 'THE REPORT WAS FOR THE PURPOSE OF GETTING PEOPLE
TO THEIR PROPER JOB LEVEL," WHICH IS CORRECT. HE CONTINUED THAT
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SAID, "THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT SALARY LEVEL SHOULD
NOT BE BASED ON COST OF LIVING INCREASES,' AND COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED
THAT 'SIF SOMEONE IS AT THE TOP OF THEIR RANGE, THEY DON'T GET A RAISE. It
MR. DONLON CONTINUED THAT CONSIDERATION OF THOSE AT THE TOP OF.THEIR
RANGE WOULD BE RELATED TOA SURVEY OF THE LOCAL JOB MARKET; IF PEOPLE
STAY AND DO NOT PROGRESS BEYOND THAT POINT, THERE ARE NO RAISES. HE
CONTINUED THAT IT COST $20,000 TO BRING PERSONNEL UP TO THE RIGHT LEVEL,
AND CODY AND STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS YEAR ONLY, A GENERAL INCREASE
BE GIVEN TO ALL -EMPLOYEES. HE NOTED THAT THIS YEAR THERE IS NOT ENOUGH
TIME TO DO A COMPLETE EVALUATION OF EACH EMPLOYEE, BUT IN FUTURE YEARS,
THERE WILL BE AND THEY WILL BE ASKING THE BOARD FOR A SET AMOUNT OF MONEY.
AT THE PRESENT TIME OUR SALARY RANGES ARE COMPETITIVE AND THE STARTING
PAYS ARE EQUAL TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, BUT IF WE STAY THERE, WE ARE
GOING BACKWARDS AGAIN - YOU CANNOT STAND STILL. NIR. DONLON INFORMED THE
BOARD THAT THEY, THEREFORE, ARE RECOMMENDING A GENERAL INCREASE FOR ALL
EMPLOYEES. HE MENTIONED THAT THE STATE OF FLORIDA HAS'RECOMMENDED A
6.7% INCREASE, ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS ARE ASKING 7%, AND PIPER IS GIVING
A COST.OF LIVING INCREASE. HE FURTHER COMMENTED THAT ALL FEDERAL EM-
PLOYEES ARE TALKING ABOUT 7%, AND THEY HAVE GOTTEN TWO COST OF LIVING
RAISES, PLUS THEIR REGULAR INCREASES ON TOP OF THAT. MR, DONLON REPORTED
THAT THE COST OF LIVING, AS OF MARCH, 1979, IS 10.3% OVER LAST YEAR.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT A PERSON WHO IS AT THE TOP OF
THEIR CATEGORY WOULD GET NO INCREASE WHATSOEVER, AND IF SOMEONE IS VERY
CLOSE, THEY CANNOT GO OVER THE TOP.
42
JUN 2 0 1979 Boos 41 PACE 42
7 1
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT MERIT RAISES.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THAT THE PLAN WE ARE UNDER NOW DOES NOT
TALK ABOUT MERIT INCREASES, BUT ABOUT EVERY EMPLOYEE BEING EVALUATED,
AND THE DEPARTMENT HEADS WILL HAVE TO JUSTIFY THE RAISE.
INTERGOVERNMENT COORDINATOR THOMAS COMMENTED THAT SOME EMPLOYEES
REALLY DESERVE MORE. HE NOTED THAT HIS PRIMARY POSITION WITH THE COUNTY
IS WHAT'HE THINKS WILL HAPPEN FINANCIALLY, AND HE THINKS THE BOARD HAS
TO KEEP A VERY CLOSE EYE ON SOME OF THOSE OTHER FACTORS - YOU MUST
CONSIDER WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN NEXT YEAR IF YOU ALLOW YOURSELF TO GET OUT
OF LINE WITH THE NEIGHBORING AREA.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED ABOUT THE GRANT FOR THIS STUDY AND
WAS ADVISED THAT WE WERE TURNED DOWN, ALONG WITH EVERYONE ELSE.
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DONLON STATED THAT WE DO NOT GIVE RAISES
ON.ANNIVERSARY DATES,. BUT DO ON THE COMPLETION OF THE SIX MONTHS PROBA-
TION PERIOD.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE AT THE TOP OF
THEIR RANGE, AND FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON.REPLIED THAT FIVE PEOPLE ARE
RIGHT AT THE MAXIMUM OR OVER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DISCUSSED A HYPOTHETICAL 7% TO BE MADE UP
OF POSSIBLY 4% MERIT AND 3% COST OF LIVING. THE EMPLOYEE WOULD GET THE
3% COST OF LIVING IMMEDIATELY, BUT -THE AMOUNT OF MERIT INCREASE THEY RE-
CEIVE WOULD BE DETERMINED AT THEIR ANNIVERSARY DATE AND COULD RANGE
FROM 0 TO 4%. HE STATED THERE SHOULD BE MONEY LEFT OVER IN EVERY SALARY
ACCOUNT EACH YEAR.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT WE STILL TEND TO BE CRITICAL OF
DEPARTMENT HEADS WHO HAVE MONEY LEFT OVER IN SALARY ACCOUNTS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE INCREASE FOR COUNTY OFFICIALS.
COMMISSIONER LOY THOUGHT IT WAS 6.7% INCLUDING FRINGE BENEFITS,
AND FELT OUR CONSITUTIONAL OFFICERS SHOULD BE HELD TO THAT, TOO.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS STATED THAT THE FINAL
DECISION WILL NOT BE MADE BY MANY DEPARTMENTS UNTIL ALMOST THE END OF
BUDGET TIME; THERE COULD BE A LOT OF CHANGES UNTIL THEN.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT MANY OF THE -DEPARTMENTS
HAVE NOT SUBMITTED THEIR BUDGETS, BUT WHATEVER THE BASE IS, IT AFFECTS
43 '
JUN 2 01979 . Boos 41 FADE 43
FIVE OF THE LINE ITEMS, AND IF THEY HAVE DIRECTION FROM THE BOARD, IT
WOULD BE EASIER. HE FURTHER STATED THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ADVISED THAT THE
INSURANCE POLICY IS NOT GOING UP, BUT SOCIAL SECURITY WOULD BE AN IN-
CREASED AMOUNT. MR. BARTON STATED THAT WE ARE MATCHING 6.13% ON SOCIAL
SECURITY. HE CONTINUED THAT IF WE AUTHORIZE 6.7%, THE GENERAL -INCREASE
WOULD BE RIGHT AROUND THE 7% FROM LAST YEAR,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT RETIREMENT AND WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE
BOARD WORK WITH A GENERAL INCREASE THAT INCLUDED THE BENEFITS.
COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT WE USE 5.5% AND LET THE
BENEFITS.GO ON TOP OF THAT.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT 5.5% PLUS BENEFITS WOULD MAKE
IT CLOSE TO 7%.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED FOR PURPOSES OF BUDGET A 5.5%
GENERAL INCREASE EXCLUDING BENEFITS, BUT NOT TO EXCEED THE SALARY RANGE
FOR THE JOB.
THE BOARD NEXT REVIEWED THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S BUDGET, COPY
OF WHICH IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING NEW AUTOMOBILES AND MAG TAPES FOR
THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S DEPARTMENT. CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED•THAT IF
THE COUNTY AUTHORIZES A 5.5% BASE INCREASE IN SALARIES SUBJECT TO THOSE
EMPLOYEES BROUGHT UP TO THE CODY REPORT, AND IF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER
HAS HOT ALREADY BROUGHT THE EMPLOYEES UP TO THE CODY REPORT, THIS GIVES
THEM A 5.5% GENERAL INCREASE.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS COMMENTED THAT IF THERE
ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE TO BE BROUGHT UP, THAT WOULD BE ON THE LOW SIDE OF
THEIR RANGE ANYWAY,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THAT WE SHOULD GIVE THE PROPERTY
APPRAISER AN OPPORTUNITY TO AMEND HIS BUDGET, AND IF HE CHOOSES NOT TO DO
S0, WE COULD RESPOND TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON POINTED OUT THAT WHAT IS.PRESENTED HERE
IS ONLY PAYING THROUGH THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S BOOKKEEPING SYSTEM; THIS
DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY EXPENSES THAT WE PAY ON HIS BEHALF OUT OF THE COUNTY
BUDGETS.
114
JUN 201979
BOOK 41 PAGE 44
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO A CONFERENCE WITH THE PROPERTY
APPRAISER, AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON AND INTERGOV-
ERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS WOULD MEET WITH MR. LAW TO GO OVER THESE
POINTS.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON REPORTED THAT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER
NAS REQUESTED THAT HIS OFFICE BE NOTIFIED OF ANY NEW TAXING DISTRICT
THAT THE BOARD WILL BE LEVYING TAXES AGAINST FOR THIS YEAR. HIS OFFICE
NEEDS SOME KIND OF A NOTICE TO THIS EFFECT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE FIRE
DISTRICT IS NEW AND SUGGESTED THAT COMMISSIONER SIEBERT AND HE DISCUSS
IT AND GIVE THE FINANCE OFFICER SOME DIRECTION CONCERNING IT.
COMMISSIONER LYONS NEXT DISCUSSED THE REPORT ON ESTABLISHING
GUIDELINES AND POLICY PROCEDURE IN RELEASING EASEMENTS, HE FELT THERE
IS SOME QUESTION OF WHETHER THIS IS A SPECIAL ACT FOR A SPECIAL PERSON
OR WHETHER IT IS A COUNTY SERVICE, AND STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE MORE
INPUT ON THIS MATTER AND WOULD DISCUSS IT AT THE NEXT MEETING.
RESOLUTION N0. 79-51, KNOWN AS.ROSELAND PLAZA UTILITY FRANCHISE,
IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF
MAY 23, 1979.
JUN 201979
L-
45
ow 41 PAT, E 45
RESOLUTION No. 79-51
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County -Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida:
SECTION 1
This Resolution shall be known and may be cited as ROSELAND
PLAZA UTILITY FRANCHISE.
SECTION 2
For the purpose of this Resolution, the following terms,
phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning given
herein. When not inconsistent with the context, words using the
present terms include the future: words in the plural number
include the singular and vice versa. The word "Shall" is always
mandatory.
(a) "County" is Indian, River County, a political subdivision
of the State of Florida: ,
(b) "Owner" is the Grantee of the rights under this
franchise, that is, Lee T. Von Stein, Charles H. Von Stein and
Sam Mufson, Trustee.
(c) "Board" is the Board of County Commissioners of the
Oounty :
(d) "Department" means the Indian River County Utilities
Department:
(e) "Person" is any person, firm, partnership, association,
corporation, company or organization of any kind.
(f) "Territory" means the area located in Indian River
County, Florida, outsidr, the corporate limits of any municipality
as the same is more particularly defined -and described herein.
(g) "Titility" means water,or sewer titilities serving
subdivisions, apartment and housing complexes, condominium, mobile
home or trailer parks, industrial complexes, shopping centers and
JUN 20 19979 . mor 41 PAcE 46
similar systems serving more than one building. "Utility"
includes wells, pumps, tanks, treatment facilities, force mains,
pumps stations, collection systems, service lines and pipes, real
- estate and easements necessary to such systems and includes every
person, corporation, lessee, trustee or receiver owning, operating,
managing or controlling a utility system or proposing construction
of a system or who is.providing or proposes to"provide sewer
service to the public.
Section 3
There is hereby granted by the County to the Owner, the
exclusive franchise, right and privilege to erect, construct,
operate and maintain a sewer system and water system within the
prescribed territory as herein provided and for these purposes to
sell treated water and sewerage collection and treatment services
within the territory and for these purposes to establish the
necessary facilities and equipment and to lay and maintain the
necessary lines, pipes, mains and other appurtenances necessary
therefor in, along, under.and.across the public alleys, streets,
roads, highways and other public places of the County; provided,
however, that the County reserves the right to permit the use of
such public places for any and all other lawful purposes and subject
always :to the paramount right of the public in and to such public
places.
Section 4
The territory in which this franchise shall be applicable
is all that part of Indian River County, Florida, located within
the following described boundary lines, to -wit:
From a P.R.M. marker on the Northeast corner of Tract "A" of Jan
.Bergen and. Hendry's Addition to Roseland, Unit No. 1, as recorded
in Plat Book 3, page 39, Docket No. 58971, Public Records of
Indian River County, Florida, run South 41° 23' 00" West along
the North boundary of said Tract "A", said line also being the
South right-of-way of Roseland Road, a distance of 138.60 feet to
the intersection of the East right-of-way of U.S. Highway No. 1;
Thence run Northerly along the East right-of-way of U.S-. Highway
No. 1 on an arc of a circular curve to the right, having a radius
of 11459.20 feet, through a central angle of 00° 20' 22", for a
distance of 67.90'feet to the intersection with the North right-
of-way of Roseland Road and point of beginning.
2
JUN 2 01919 Boos 41 'PAcE 47
From said point of beginning, run North 410 23' 00" East along
the North right-of-way of Roseland Road a distance of 714.20 feet
to a point, said point being 25 feet North and 1030.00 feet West
of an iron pipe on the bank of the Indian River, said last
mentioned pipe being 10 feet South of a concrete post or monument
at Gibson.'s wharf; Thence at right angles to the North right-of-way
of said Roseland Road, run North 180 37' 00" West along the East
line of property described in Deed Book 43, page 487, Public
Records of Indian River County, Florida, a distance of 300 feet
to an iron pipe; Thence continue North 480 37' 00" West a distance
of 250.45 feet to a point on the North line of property as
described in Parcel -No. 1 and.recorded in Official Record Book 453.
page 882, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; Thence
run South 410 23' 00" West_ along sa_d North line of property a
distance of 63.19 feet; Thence run South 46° 18' 00" West a
distance of 322.28 feet to the East right-of-way of U. S. Highway
No. 1; Thence run Southerly on the East right-of-way of U. S.
Highway No. along a curve to the left, having a radius of
11459.20 feet, through a central angle of 03 19' 42", an arc
distance of 665.67 feet to the point of beginning, and
"From a 4" X 4" Concrete monument at the intersection of Roseland
Road and the west shore of. the Indian River, said monument being
10 feet North of a pipe marking the old location of Gibson's
wharf, run Northerly along the shoreline a distance of 356.38
feet to an iron pipe: thence continue Northerly along the shoreline
a distance of 200 feet to a pipe; Thence run South 410 23' 00"
West'a distance of 968.06 feet to a concrete monument and the
point of beginning": From said point of beginning continue South
410 23' 00" -West a distance of 182.76 feet to an iron pipe;
Thence run South 480 37' 00" East a distance of 197.85 feet_to an
iron pipe; Thence run North 410 23' 00" East a distance of 171.83
feet to a concrete monument; Thence run North 450 27' 00" West a
distance of 197.84 feet•to'the point of beginning. Said parcel
also being described as Follows: From a P.R.M*Marker on the
North2ast corner of Tract "A" of Van Bergen and Hendry's Addition
to Roseland, Unit No. 1, as.recorded in Plat Book 3, page 39,
Docket No. 58971, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida,
run South 410 23' 00"West along the '_North boundary of said Tract
"A", said line also being the South right-of-way of Roseland Road,
a distance of 138.60 feet to the intersection of the East
right-of-way of U. S. Highway No. 1; Thence run Northerly along
the East right-of-way of U. S. Highway on an arc of a circular
curve to the right, having a radius of 11459...20 feet, through a
central angle of 000 20' 22", for a distance of 67.90 feet to
the intersection with the North right-of-way of Roseland Road,
thence run North 410 23' 00" East along the North right-of-way of
Roseland Road a distance of 714.20 feet to a point, said point
being 25 feet North and 1030 feet West of an iron pipe on the bank
of the Indian River, said last mentioned pine being 10 feet South
of a concrete monument at Gibson's Wharf; Thence at right angles
to the North right-of-way of said Roseland Road run North 480 37' 00"
West along the East property line of property described in Deed
.Book 43, page 487, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida,
a distance of 352.6 feet to an iron pipe and point of beginning;
From point of beginning continue North 480 37' 00" West a distance
of 197.85 feet; Thence run North 410 23' 00" East along the North
line of property as described in Parcel No. 1 and recorded in
O. R. Book 453, page 382, Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida, a distance of 182.76 feet to a concrete monument, said
concrete monument lying South 410 23' 00" West a distance of 20.17
feet from the Southwesterly F.R.M. of River.Trees. Subdivision as
recorded in Plat Book 9, page 24, Public Rocords of Indian River
County, Florida; From said concrete monument run Sduth.450 27' 00"
East a distance of 197.84 feet to a concrete monument; Thence run
South 410 23' 00" West a distance of 171.83 feet to the point of
beginning.
-3-
JUN
3-
JU 20 1970
10 BOOK 41PAGE 48
P
Section b
The Owner shall at all times during the life of this franchise
be subject to all lawful exercise of the police power and
regulatory authority of the County and to such regulation as the
County shall hereafter by resolution or ordinance provide.
Section 6
It is expressly understood and agreed by and between the
Owner and The County that the Owner shall hold the County and
members of the Board harmless from any loss sustained by the
County on account of any suit, judgment, execution, claim or demand
whatsoever resulting from negligences on the part of the Owner
in the construction, operation or maintenance under the terms of
this franchise. The parties agree that in the construction of
this section, the claim of any person resulting from negligence
on the part of the Owner may be prosecuted directly by such person
against the Owner as if no governmental immunity accrued to the
County by virtue of the Owner's use of a public place of the
County. The County shall notify the Owner promptly after
presentation of any claim or demand.
Section 7
The Owner shall maintain and operate its plant and system
and render efficient service in accordance with the rules and
regulations as are or may be set forth by the Board from time to
time. Additionally the Owner shall comply with all requirements of
the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Division of
Health, the Department of Environmental Regulations, the Indian
River County Utilities Department and.appropriate planning agencies
relative to construction, design, operation, capacity, maintenance
and expansion. The right is hereby reserved to the County to
- 4 -
JUN 2 01979 IMOK 41 FaAGE 49
I
adopt, in addition to the provisions herein contained and existing
applicable resolutions or laws, such additional regulations as it
shall find necessary in the exercise of.the police power and
lawful authority vested in said County, provided that such
regulations shall be reasonable and not in conflict with the
rights herein granted and not; n conflict with the laws of the
State of Florida. The County shall have the right to supervise all
construction or installation work performed and to make such
inspection as it shall find necessary to insure compliance with
all governing.regulations. Upon the termination of this franchise,
as provided in Section 21, the Owner shall grant and deliver to the
County, upon demand of the County, all of its facilities, system,
easements, and rights appurtenant thereto (except the treatment
plant and the site for same) lying within Indian River County
without charge to the County. In the event any part or all of the
territory.covered by this franchise shall be hereinafter in-
corporated in the limits of any municipality of the State of
Florida, then in such event the Owner agrees as a part of the
consideration of the granting of this franchise that said
municipality is herewith granted the right, power and authority
to, acquire all the property, assets and facilities of the Owner
without charge used in its services under this franchise.
Section 8
Owner shall commence construction of its sanitary sewer
treatment and collection system within 90 days from date, otherwise
the franchise created hereby may become void and of no further
force or effect at the option of the Board. All the facilities
of the. Owner shall be constructed only in accordance with plans
and specifications approved by fhe State Board of Health'of the
State of Florida and the Indian River County Utilities Department
and the quantity and quality of sewerage treatment shall at all
times be and remain not inferior to the rules, regulations and
- 5 -
JUN 2 01979 • BOOK 41 FACE 50
M M
standards now or hereafter adopted by the State Board of Health.
Whenever it is necessary to shut off or interrupt services for
the purposes of making repairs or installations, the Owner shall
do so at such time as will cause the lease amount of inconvenience
to its consumers and unless such repairs are unforeseen and
immediately necessary, it shall give reasonable notice thereof to
its customers.
SECTION 9
(a) The owner shall have the authority to promulgate such
rules, regulations, terms and conditions covering the conduct of
its business as shall be reasonably necessary to enable the Owner
to exercise its rights and perform its obligations under this
franchise, and'to issue an uninterrupted service to such and all
of its consumers; provided, however, that such rules, regulations,
terms and conditions shall not be in conflict with the provisions
hereof or with the laws of the State of Florida and all of the
same shall be subject to the approval of the Board.
(b) At all times herein where discretionary power is left
with the Board of County Commissioners, the owner, before
discretionary action is taken by The Board of County Commissioners,
may request said Board that a group of arbitrators be authorized
to determine such discretionary action and such.group shall consist
of:
1. Board's Consulting Engineer
2. owner's Engineer
3. one person selected by the two above persons. The Board
of Arbitrators so authorized and constituted shall make recommenda-
tions to the Board of County Commissioners but such recommendations
are not mandatory.
Any.final decision the arbitrators or Board may have., with
respect to this franchise, may be appealed to the Circuit Court of
Indian.River County by either party. -
J U N 2 0.1979 nv 41 FACE 51
P
SECTION 10
All pipes, mains, lift -stations, pumps, valves and other
fixtures laid or placed by the Owner shall be so located in the
public places in the County as not to obstruct or interfere with
any other uses made of such public places already installed. The
Owner shall whenever practicable avoid interfering with the use of
any street, alley or other highway where the paving or surface of
the same would be disturbed. In case of any disturbance of
pavement, sidewalk, driveway or other surfacing, the Owner shall
at its own cost and expense and in a manner anproved by the Country
Engineer, replace and restore all such surface so disturbed in as
good condition as before said work was commenced and shall maintain
the restoration in an approved. condition for a period of one year.
In the event that any time thr' County shall lawfully elect to
alter or change the grade of or relocate or widen or otherwise
change any such public way, the Owner shall, upon reasonable
notice by the County, remove, relay, and relocate its fixtures at
its own expense. The Owner shall not locate any of its facilities
nor do any construction which would create any obstructions or
conditions which are or may become dangerous to the traveling
public. In the event any such public place under or upon which
the Owner shall have located its facilities shall be closed,
abandoned, vacated or discontinued, the Board may terminate such
easement or license of the Owner thereto, provided, however, in
the event of this termination of easement, any person, except the
County, requesting such termination shall pay to the Owner, in
advance, its costs of removal and relocation of the removed
facilities in order to continue its service as theretofore
existing, or in the County shall retain an easement not less than
ten feet in width for the benefit of the Owner and its facilities.
SECTION 11
The Owner shall•not as to rates, charges,,services,•facilities,
rules, regulations or in any other respect make or grant any
-7-
JUN 2 01979 Boa 41 PAGE 52
preference or advantage to any person nor subject any person to
any prejudice or disadvantage, provided that nothing herein
shall prohibit the establishment of a graduated scale of charges
and classified rate schedule to which any consumer coming within
such classification would be entitled.
SECTIO' 12
(a) Tho Owner shall furnish, supply, install and make
available its.sewer collection and treatment system to any and
all persons within the territory making demand therefor, and
shall provide such demanding person with its services and
facilities within 120 days from the date of such demand; provided,
however, that the Board may, upon application of the Owner, extend
the time for providing such service to such demanding person. In
the event, the Owner fails to provide its services and facilities
to any area within the territory within the time provided, then
in such event the County may by resolution of the Board limit,
restrict and confine the territory to that area then being
serviced by the Owner or such areater area as the Board shall
determine and thereafter the territory shall be the only area
set forth, defined and provided by the Board and the provision of
this franchise shall not extend beyond the limits of the area so
restricted and defined.
(b) 'The Owner shall not be required to furnish, supply,
install and make available its sewer collection and treatment
system to any person within the territory as hereinafter set forth,
unless the same may be done at such a cost to the Owner as shall
make the addition proposed, financially and physically feasible.
Financially feasible shall mean that with a fair and reasonable
.rate to be charged by the Owner for all the Services under this
franchise, to the end, that such rate will produce to the Owner a
Gam sufficient to meat all necessary costs ofi the services; including
-8-
J U N 2 0 1979 BOOK 41 PACE 53
ej
a fair rate of return on the net valuation of its property
devoted thereto, under efficient and•economical management. The
burden of showing that a prospective service to the area is not
financially feasible shall not be the burden of the Owner.
SECTION 13
The Owner.shall not sell or transfer its plant or system to
another nor transfer any rights under this franchise to another
without the approval of the Board and provided, further, that no
such sale or transfer after such approval shall be effective until
the vendee, assignee or lessee has filed with the Board an
instrument in writing reciting the fact of such transfer and
acceptingthe terms of this franchise and agreeing to perform all,
of the conditi6ns thereof. In any event this franchise shall not
be transferrable and assianable until notice or request for transfer
and assignment shall be given by the Owner to the Board in
writing, accompanied by a request from the proposed transferee,
which application shall contain information concerning the
financial status and other qualifications of the proposed trans-
feree and such other information as the Board may require. A
public hearing shall be held on such request of which notice shall
be given by publication in a newspaper regularly published in
the County at least one time not more than one month nor less
than one week preceding such hearing. Certified proof of
publication of such notice shall be filed with the Board. Said
hearing may thereafter be continued from time to time as determined
by the Board. The Board will, however, approve or disapprove such
sale or transfer within ninety (90) days from the•date of said
public hearing. The consent by the Board to any assignment of
this franchise shall not unreasonably be withheld.
SECTION 14
The rates charged by.the Owner for its service hereunder
shall be fair and rdasonable and designed to meet all necessary
costs of the service, including a.fair rate of return on the net.
-9-
JUN 2 01979 BOOK 41' PAGE 54
valuation of its properties devoted thereto under efficient and
economical management. The Owner agrees that it shall be subject
to all authority now or hereafter possessed by the County or any
other regulatory body having competent jurisdiction to fix just,
reasonable and compensatory rates. When this franchise takes
effect, the Owner shall have authority to charge and collect not
to exceed the following rates:
WATER RATE:.
3/4" meter (min.) 1st 3,000 gal/ water used $ 7.54
1" meter (min.) 1st 4,000 gal/water used 12.12
114" meter (min.) 1st 8,000 gal/water used 16.40
V:," meter (min.) 1st 12,000 gal/water used 31.36
2" meter (min.) 1st 16,000 gal/water used 39.20
All usage in excess Of the aforementioned will be charged
on a basis of $1.50 per 1,000 gallons.
SEWER RATE:
1.5 times the water charge.
Owner's rates shall at -all times be subject to the review and
approval of Indian River County's Board of County Commissioners
and no change may be made by Owner in the basis of its rates
without first making agnlication therefor and public hearing
thereon.
SECTION 15
The County shall have access at all reasonable hours to all
of the Owner's plans, contracts, engineering data, accounting,
financial,stati•stical, consumer and service records relating to
the property and the operation of the Owner and to all other
records, required to be kept hereunder,'and it shall.file such
accounting reports and data with the County when required.
SECTION 16
The Owner shall at all times maintain public liability and
property damage insurance in such amounts as shall be required
from time to time by the Board in accordance with good business
-10-
JUN
10-
JUN 2 0 1979 BOOK 41 PAGE 55
M
practices as determined by safe business standards as established
by the Board for the protection of the County and the general
public and for any liability which may result from any action of
the Owner. The County shall be named as•an additional insured on.
all such policies of insurance and a copy of the policy shall be
delivered to the County Administrator. If any person serviced by
the Owner under this franchise complains to the Board concerning
rates, charges and/or operations of such utility and the Owner
after request is made upon it by the Board, fails to satisfy or
remedy such complaints or objections or fails to satisfy the Board
that said complaint or objection is not proper, the Board may
thereupon, after due notice to such utility, schedule a hearing
concerning such complaint or objection and the Board may review the
rates acid charges set and char_ged'by the Owner for the services
which it furnishes or the nature and character of the service it
furnishes or the quality or services furnished. If the Board
enters its order pursuant to such a hearing and the Owner feels
it is aggrieved by such order, the Owner may seek review of the
Board's action by proceedings in the Circuit Court of the County,
otherwise, the Owner shall promptly comply with the order of the
Board.
SECTION 17
Should the Owner desire to increase any charges heretofore
established and approved by the Board, then the Owner shall
notify the Board in writing, setting forth a schedule of rates
and charges which it proposes. A public hearing shall be held
on such request, of which notice shall be given by publication in
a newspaper regularly published in said County at least one time
not more than one month nor less than one week preceding such
. hearing. Certified proof of publication of such notice shall be
filed with the Board. Said hearing may thereafter be continued
from time to time as determined by the Board. The Board will,
however, approve or disapprove said increase in rates within
ninety (90) days of said public hearing. If the Board enters
J U N 2 01979 41 PAGE 56
I
order pursuant to said hearing and the Owner or any person feels
aggrieved by such order, then the Owner or such person may seek
review of the Board's action by proceedings in the Circuit Court
of the County..
SECTION 18
Prior to the Owner constructing any of its facilities as
herein authorized the owner shall make application to and obtain
a permit from the Indian River County Utilities Department
authorizing said construction. The County shall have the right
when special circumstances exist to determine the time in which
such construction shall be done.
SECTION 19
If the Owner fails or refuses to promptly and faithfully keep,
perform and abide by each and all of the terms and conditions of
this franchise, then the Board shall give the Owner written notice
of such deficiencies or defaults and a reasonable time within.
which the Owner shall remedy the same, which notice shall specify
the deficiency or default. If the Owner fails to remedy such
deficiency or default within the time required by the notice from
the Board, the Board may thereafter schedule a hearing concerning
the same with reasonable notice thereof to the Owner and after
such hearing at which all interested parties shall be heard, the
Board may further limit or restrict this franchise or may
terminate and cancel the same in whole or in part if proper
reasons therefor are found by the Board. If the Board enters
order pursuant to such hearing and the Owner or any other person
feels aggrieved by such order, the utility or such other person
may seek review of the Board's action by proceedings'in the
Circuit Court -of the County.
SECTION 20
This franchise shall not affect, limit or restrict the rights
or privilenes as set forth and contained in any license issued to
-12-
JUN 2 01979 ma 41 FACE 57
J
M
O
any utility heretofore granted by the Board pursuant to Section
125.42, Florida Statutes.
Section 21
The franchise and rights herein granted shall take effect and
be in force from and after the time of the adoption of this
resolution by the Board and shall continue in force and effect
until such time as the County, a municipal corporation of the
State of Florida, within the territory of this franchise, may
install or acquire its own sewerage collection and treatment system
and water treatment system and supplies the same to individual
customers at which time, Owner shall convey all of its facilities
(except for sewer treatment plant and plant site) and easements
for location of same as Owner may own, free and clear of all liens
or mortgages, to said County without charge.
Within sixty (60) days from the time of the aodption of this
resolution, the Owner shall file with the Board it written
acceptance of this franchise and all of its terms and conditions
and provide further that if such,acceptance is not filed within
the time specified, then the provisions of this franchise shall be
null and void.
If any word, section, clause or part of this resoltion is
held invalid, such portion shall be deemed a separate and
independent part and the same shall not invalidate the remainder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, has caused this franchise to be
executed in'the name of the County of Indian River by the Chairman
of the Board of County Commissioners, and its seal to be affixed
and attested by its Clerk, all pursuant to the resolution of the
Board of County Commissioners adopted on the a'5 day of
1979.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
- '13 -
JUN 2 0 1979
.COUNTY OF INDIAN (lRIVER, FL RIDA
By: r !�(
William C. Wodtke, Jr'.,'Chairman
• BOOK 41 PIA GE 58
I
Attest:
Clerk
ACCEPTANCE. OF FRANCHISE
The undersigned hereby accepts the foregoing franchise and for
t}iemselves and their successors and assigns, do hereby covenant
and agree to comply.with and abide by all the torms, conditions
and provisions therein set forth and contained.
S�7 -J&- ` 1979 .
DATED this �'� day of
Approved as to form:
County Attorney
LEE T. VON STEIN, CHARLES H.
VON STEIN AND SAM MUFSON., TRUSTEE
B 4 .
YLee, T. Von Stein, Partner
Y
Charles �!. Von Stein, Partner
-A- -
.JUN
A -
JUN 2 01979 41 FAGS 59
RESOLUTION N0. 79-52 AND THE RELEASE OF EASEMENT IN GRANADA
GARDENS UNIT NO. I FOR THOMAS E. HARE AND DEANNE J. HARE IS HEREBY MADE
A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1979.
RESOLUTION NO. 79- 52
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida,
has been requested to release the side lot line easements as hereinafter described;
and
WHEREAS, said side•lot line easements were dedicated on the Plat of said
Subdivision for public utility purposes; and
WHEREAS, the request for such release of easements has been submitted in
proper form;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the following side lot line easements shall be released,
abandoned and vacated as follows:
The side and rear lot line easements running from North to South
between Lots 1 and 3, 2 and 3, 3 and 4, 4 and 5, 5 and 6, 17 and
18, 17 and 19; and running from East to West between Lots 1 and
2, 2 and 18, 3 and 18, 4 and 17, 18 and 19; A-1 in Block 'B' of
GRANADA GARDENS UNIT NO. 1, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 91,
of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners
and the Clerk of the Circuit Court be, and they are hereby authorized and directed
to execute a release of said lot line easements hereinabove referred to in form
proper for recording and placing in the Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida.
DATED this 6th day of
Attest:
-&—�=
-Clerk - Freda Wright
JUN 201979
June , 19 79.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:/A, ce&" C L
Chairman - William C. Wod , Jr.
sn
Boa 41 P4GE 60
I
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
THIS Release of Easement, executed this day of June , 1979 ,
by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, first party, to
_ THOMAS E HARE and DEANNE T PARE, ►,ta . F ,
whose post office address is 118 S W 11th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 ,
second party:
WITNESSETH: That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum
of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by
the said second party, does hereby remise, release, abandon and quit -claim unto
the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand
which the said first party has in and to the following described easement, lying
on -land situate in the County of Indian River, State of Florida, to -wit:
The side and rear lot line easements running from North to South
between Lots l and 3, 2 and 3, 3 and 4, 4 and 5, 5 and 6, 17 and
18, 17 and 19; and running from East to West between Lots 1 and 2,
2 and 18, 3 and 18, 4 and 17, 18 and 19; All in Block 'B' of
GRANADA GARDENS UNIT NO. 1, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 91,
of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same with all and singular the appurtenances there-
unto belonging or in anywise appertaining and all the estate, right, title,
interest, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party either in law or in
equity to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents
by the parties so authorized by the law the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
AF
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COMM OF INDIAN RIVER ) ss.
BOARD OF COUNTY CO;-1141SSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: A44.4, C
Cliairman
Attest: (Seal)
Clerk
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authorized in
the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and
FREDA WRIGHT, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, to me known to be the persons duly
authorized by said County to execute the foregoing instrument, and they acknow-
ledged before me that they executed the same for•and on behalf of said political
subdivision.
WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last aforesaid this
a1 4& day of June 7g
, 19 -
dl
Notary Public, State of Florida at
Large. My commission expires:
Notary Public. $lats of Florida of Larps
My COMMI„lan Expires March 29, 1930
tonded by American rice & Casualty Co.
BOOK 41 FACE 61
I
RESOLUTION "JO, 79-53) REGARDING GoVERM MENT IPJ THE SUNSHINE
LAW IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE "11NUTES AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF
JUNE 5, 1979,
RESOLUTION NO. 79-53
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That in order to comply with
Government in the Sunshine Law, Florida Statute 286.011,
the following procedures will be followed in regard.to notifying
the press of scheduled meetings:
A. REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS:
1. Notice to be placed on the door of the County
Commission Room in the Indian River County Courthouse.
2. Notice to be placed in the County Administrator's
office.
3. Notice to be placed in the office of the Agency
involved.
4. A summary of all County meetings distributed to the
Press on a weekly basis.
B. MEETINGS CALLED UPON SHORT NOTICE:
1. Notice to be placed on the door of the County
Commission Room in the Indian River County Courthouse.
2. Notice to be placed in the County Administrator's
office.
3. Notice to be placed in the office of the Agency
involved.
4. County Personnel shall telephone representatives
of the news media having resident offices in Indian
River County putting them on notice of the meeting.
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 6th
day of June , 1979.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY ;�14-efltlbtu \ &Ae
William C.Wodtke, Jr., C 'rman
Attest:
Freda Wright, C1 rk
na 41 PAr;'E 62
J
RESOLUTION N0. 79-46 AND RELEASE OF EASEMENT FOR WILLIAM J.
INGRAM AND TAMARA B. INGRAM IN ROYAL POINCIANA PARK, N0. 2, IS HEREBY
MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF MAY 9, 1979,
INCLUDING QUIT CLAIM TO THE COUNTY FROM THE INGRAMS ON A 10' EASEMENT.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-46
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, has been requested to release that easement lying
on the East line of Lots 1 and 2, Block .15 of ROYAL POINCIINA PARK,
PLAT NO. 2, according to the Plat thereof filed in the office of
the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, in
Plat Book 4, page 44; and
WHEREAS, said East line easement was dedicated nn the Plat
of ROYAL POINCIA14A PARK SUBDIVISION for public utility purposes;
and
WHEREAS, the request for such release of easement has been
submitted in proper form;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY C01%1-
MISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following
lot line easement in ROYAL POINCIANA PARK, NO. 2 shall be released,
abandoned and vacated as follows:
That easement lying on the East line of Lots 1 and 2,
Block 15, of ROYAL POINCIANA PARK NO. 2, as recorded in
Plat Book 4, page 44, Public Records of Indian River
County, Florida
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of
County C'oaaissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court be, and
they ,are hereby authorized and directed to execute a release of
said lot line easement hereinabove referred to in a form proper
for recording and placing in the Public Records of Indian River
County, Florida.
Thin 13th day of June , 1979.
Attest:
Freda Wright, Clei}V
JUN 201979
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER//COUNTY, FLORIDA
By (4,
tt `tJ-• f/.�� ..r.�j/r.-L�
William C•. Wodtke, Jr. , Chairman
'BOOK 41 ' FAcE 63
I
I
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
This Release of Easement, executed this 18th day of
June , 1979, by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State
of Florida, first party; to WILLIAM J. INGR701 and TAMARA B. TNk,rZ'1i1,
whose post office address if 576 16th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florid -.1
32960, second party:
WITNESSETH:
That the said party of the first part for and in consideration
of the sum of ONE DOLLARS ($1.00) and other good and valuable con-
sideration in hand paid by the said second party, does hereby remise,
release, abandon, and quit claim unto the said second party forever,
all the right, title, int.erest,claim and demand which the said
first party has in and to the following described easement, lyinq
on land situate in the County of. Indian River County, State (-)f
Florida, to -wit:
That easement lying on the East line of Lots 1 and 2,
Block 15, of ROYAL -POINCIANA PARK NO. 2, as recorded
in Plat Book 4, page -44, Public Records of Indian River
County, Florida.
TO HAVE AND TO IIOLD the same with all and singular the
appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining and
all estate, right, title, interest, equity and claim whatsoever
of the said first party either in law or equity to the only proper
use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever.
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed
these presents by the parties so authorized by the law the day
and year first above. written.
Signed, sealed and delivered BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
in the presence of: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
j' William C.( 11odtke,,..Jr. , Chairm..::i
A o t ( a�t. Attest a---)I"l�_ /
Freda Wright, Clerk --
PlltCPAP.ED 6Y'
GEO" G` G (,(;; ; io, ,in.
`a1AN^:ING I;tiA�tiilJ. Ali!tC'.i'iS ^.l (AYJ
P. 0. BOX CFG 7;1 r( ACHLA. _( PLVD.
Wlgi) i?::ACH. i L0t1.f0A
,SUN 2 01979
800K 41 PAGE 64
J
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me an officer duly
authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements,
personally appeared, WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., as Chairman of the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, and FREDA WRIGHT, as Clerk of
the Circuit Court, to me known to be the persons duly authorized
by said County to execute the foregoing instrument and they
acknowledged before me that they executed the same for and on
behalf of the said political subdivision.
WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last afore-
said this �rK" day of %t 1979.
Notazy Public, Sate of Florida at Large.
My commission expires:
No!try PAI:'!, 5;,,!0 0( F`onrin n! Irr. q„
(Notary Seal My Comms>;on - P; 27,
BonJ:� h, Aren:an
JUN 2-01979
$%y �-L FACE
L�
eW
tans~A.t tilN roans e
F.enued n64 da A. l.3. 1079 .61
oII"t M J. I6itiAAM and TAla11IiA B. ZMRA$l, his wife
AW PW is
,1�11jpr�27�M( Rr�VBR COUM, a political subdivision of the State of
t.As�oOpw�ta`7tw ddwu 4
e,a+ad wits=
[7 IM�s+.r d MMn i ws "!w1 mow' W "...+d P.b•• Y IrL.i. �oadu W 1�. � ku1
7 -�•w�.w�d�� J rwW.� W o. rrn W ..ter .1 srr.+..w .t..«w v syr
T6d t6o wd Js.n pats. Jar..td tn.,a,tdaaatt.a of t6. sew off 10.00
to hoed ped 4 tM tad ,Wmd pmts. t6. r ,*w 0.6mv4 4 6.6 etfim-wwj. do" lu.e6y aw ". n
6w ewd qau- alae uxft the tatd eewnd pats /mea.., dl d..1pk. mf#. into"". claim WQ d m.,ed W".
t6 *ad /Int poly 6w to "to ab WLwbp Jw-tb,d Ia. Ph— a pQ''o) W 6.d. ma -,4. him ..d 6.arw
a cis Cswetr .J Indian River Stu../ Floridm . n. WU-. i
I
An easement over the South 10 feet of Loi 2. Block 14,
RMAL P0=1AYA PAM NO. 2, according to plat thereof j
recorded in Flat Book i, page !f of the Public Records
Of Indian River County, Florida, for drainage, utilities,
both public and private, and access for ingress and egress. t
Div
ir R1
Fal-iszm YP P A I
i ec os r
30
00.301
01
FLQRt SUR w
tz
00.55
i
� DQ its tM. waw tosFt%.s ouG ap and wwola► rba sgp�r4.m�ca. tl...amnes �
m in v"w:m aad .11 A. e.W#..t &l. till.. tmemwo. 6a..gmttr ",6m e AW -
d de and %beet poy. "A" to " r worts. b tl. Daly mapw &W. Lv k owd 64.4 .1 ,6 mid
tentui p>mis �atea'er. i
y lY. e. d Jr. r+ety 6w .+,.d aJ ...W 0.e. p•+..a4 the de, sad yay
[Od 46M
essW end 4 tom• ai: i
t� an
.. Tamara 8: IAgranl I
$TAT[tH ►LOR14%
txuroty Of IRDM RIM r
I t URSY CMTIfY mu ae un d... Ie4,..v..e �
:� caret dak twei.aW4 is d%.e.
tuw amw ! m m. Caner .twe.eH 0 4►..,►.wM ". rm—Ath AWMW
gILLIAM Z.
IMM and TAMARA B.IWAM, his wife
a r Ranee 1s be tat. pvmee &.Wawa to .d e." Mftwd m Ie..A.we eaaa+a.+m ..d they sd.n.bdtaa
I.t... am " they.w--wm ,!. ,ams.
MMIS on LmA ora .amt ilei m Y. Came. wA I"" W dor." en .r-
I i+t J
(/ Notary �ic, Stdcas40� it9a of
Haan mmarrmw.ta�e Large. Ry ctrmisgiab et;ii,/sn
� t AsrA at. teat' � y ;- l
eA010 t/ Iwtr/
Pm.- &eat 4 iP'e+-p f. d.
E3{ ti t�flRe$. !R r6+ ooem�an seswwwe A. nstea �
Cyd Tho lmasssrtrar �opertd Ij'catt.�
mft to t wmEi. IVA" a
64L'MM nywlia a. A110S--Ars AT (AW
� [Thtt3
•• ��n9 r, q It $t + .
r-® as . lit Asm 10%
� s ;
JUN 201979
BaOKl PAGE sU
P
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED
AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND
NOS, 62273 - 62390 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED
FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK
AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH
RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND
CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 5:50 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
7
CLERK
67
JUN 201979
F, III r'Fl
OCHAIRMAN V(
BOOK 11i PACE 67