Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/5/1979WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1979 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1979, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE LOY, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.; R. DON DEESON; AND PATRICK B. LYONS. ALSO PRESENT WERE NEIL NELSON, ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; AND JANICE W. CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERK. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER. COMMISSIONER LOY LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND JIM NEWSOME, MINISTER OF EDUCATION, FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH, GAVE THE INVOCATION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ISSUANCE OF DUPLICATE TAX SALE CERTIFICATE N0. 129 TO DAPHNE STRICKLAND. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO THE OFFICE EXPENSE AND SUPPLIES ACCOUNT, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE OFFICE EXPENSE OFFICE SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NO, INCREASE 03-2324-204.00 $200.00 03-2324-205.00 $200.00 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 03-9990-701.00 DECREASE $400.00 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO THE INSURANCE ACCOUNT TO PAY FOR THE NEW VEHICLES PURCHASED BY THE PROPERTY APPRAISER, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No, INCREASE DECREASE INSURANCE AND BONDS 01-2211-330.00 $500.00 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $500.00 SEP 51979 . PACE 447 SEP 51979 Poox 41 Pvur- ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED .BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO SEND VOTING TECHNICIANS TO TRAINING SCHOOL, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No, INCREASE DECREASE AUTO ALLOWANCE & TRAVEL 01-2441-328,00 $704,00 EQUIPMENT 01-2441-402,00 $704,00 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR AN ADJUSTMENT FOR PEBBLE BAY UTILITY DEPARTMENT, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 01-7101-341.01 $800,00 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 x.:11 11' ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT,'SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE LETTER FROM IBM OUTLINING THE PURCHASE OF IBM EQUIPMENT, AS FOLLOWS: International Business Machines Corporation Mr. Jeffrey K. Barton Director of Finance Indian River County Courthouse Annex Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Jeff: P.O, Box 39 Orlando, Florida 32802 305/849-9100 August 28, 1979 This letter is for the purpose of presenting the facts and figures re- lated to purchasing your Installed IBM System/3 computer. The purchase price for your equipment is $46,965 during the month of September, 1979- The monthly maintenance for the purchased system would be $679.50 per month. If you use the IBM Installment Payment Agreement at 7 3/4% in- terest -for 12 months, the monthly installment payment would be $4,053.80 for a total of $4,733.30 per month. Anticipating an August, 1980, shipment of your on -order System/38, the total expense of purchase should be less than your projected budget for the coming fiscal year. This takes into account software and the two months rental savings during conversion. It does not include a residual value for the System/3. The county's total savings should then be great- er by that amount. Currently, a-System/3 configured identically to yours would cost $87,629 if purchased directly from IBM. We are looking forward to a favorable decision on this matter in the near future so as to maximize the county's savings. Si - cl , -e K. rad i sh Account Representative 2 ON POTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLLS, COUNTY COURT, .JULY TERM, 1979, IN THE AMOUNT OF $57,22; CIRCUIT COURT, SPRING TERM, 1979, IN THE AMOUNTS OF $20,06 AND $94.20, RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK: RECEIPT FOR DEPOSIT OF COUNTY FUNDS, FROM SHERIFF .JOYCE, CHECK #11917 - $1,273,55, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING LETTER WITH THE BOARD: „r DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Address reply to. t b COMMANDER UNITED STATES COAST GUARD (oan) Seventh Coast Guard District 51 S.W. 1st Avenue Miami, Fla. 331317 Phone: (305) 350-5621 16515 Serial: 1833 25 May 1979 - Mr. Wilbur Vanderslice Vero Shores Association r 1978 -6th avenue, S.E. Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Mr. Vanderslice: Vero Shores Daybeacons were inspected 24 May 1979 by a representative of the Commander, Coast Guard Group, Miami, Florida. The inspecting officer reports that Daybeacons 5, 6, 8 and 10 are missing. They are to be rebuilt on charted positions and the old structures removed from the waterway. • N Although - Vero Shores Daybeacons are privately maintained, mariners transiting these -waters reasonably expect to find the aids as indicated on nautical charts and as advertised in the Light List. Furthermore, Title 33 Code of Federal Regulations, Part G5.01-20 rr. Wres th,,.t all classes of private aids to navigation be maintained in proper condition at all times. Accordingly, you are requested to rectify the discrepancies as soon as practicable. Please advise this office, by letter, when corrective action has been completed and include disposition of each old structure. Your cooperation with the Coast Guard in maritime safety will be appreciated. Sincerely, J. C. BETANCOUR T, JR. Private Aids to Navigation Administrator Aids to Navigation Branch Seventh Coast Guard District By direction of the District Commander Copy: Mr. Albert Visca, Treasurer,. Vero Shores Association, 1914-uth Avenue, S.i ,, Vero 11nach, FL 32960 Commander, U. S. Coast Cuard Group, Miami, FL Officer in Charge, U. S. Coast Guard _Aids to Navigation Team, Ft. Pierce, FL 3 l3QQK Atl PAGE SEP 51979 . PAA50 ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED,BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THAT PRO- POSALS BE OBTAINED FOR PROPERLY CONSTRUCTING THE VERO SHORES DAYBEACONS AS REFERENCED IN THE LETTER OF MAY 25, 1979 FROM THE U, S. COAST GUARD. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR L.S. "TOMMY' THOMAS TO DAYTONA BEACH, SEPTEMBER 13 - 15, 1979 TO ATTEND AN ARTIFICIAL REEF SEMINAR - SEA GRANT PROGRAM. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE STATE MEDICAL EXAMINERS CONTRACT AS OUTLINED IN THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES: i STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Bob Graham. Governor Health & Rehabilitative Services 1317 WINEWOOD BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 TO: Boards of County Commissions FROM: W. H. Braatz. Administrator. Medical Examiners' Program SUBJECT: 1979-80 State Funding Contract Enclosed, please find three copies of the State Medical Examiners' Funding Contract. The Legislature appropriated $1,471,960.00 for the Medical Examiners' Commission (MEC) to distribute for the purpose of improving medical examiner services. The MEC in executive session July 14, 1979 adopted a distribution formula primarily based on the projected 1979 mid year population forecast. At the same meeting the MEC approved the basic Contract enclosed. Please note: the intent of the Commission is to reduce paperwork, reporting and money transfer complications resulting from differences between State and County Fiscal Years. To that end the standard Contract has been changed from requiring four quarterly county expenditure reports to only one annual county expenditure report. The new annual report should contain the total amount of county generated funds spent in support of medical examiner services and the State funds spent to improve the service delivery capability of the District Medical Examiner. The one annual report should cover the period of the County Fiscal Year October 1, 1978 to September 30, 1979. This report should be returned to this office as soon after the closing of the county's books for the F.Y. as convenient. 1 State appropriations are allocated to departments by quarters, hence the unreduced fraction (2/4). One half the paragraph 2.1 amount will be authorized upon execution of the Contract, the remainder upon receipt of the annual report. Should you have any questions about this matter, please call: W. H. Braatz, Administrator Medical Examiners' Program 1323 Winewood Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32301 (904) 487-2947 P. S. Please sign and return 3 copies. One fully executed copy with original signatures will be returned to the County. WNB:sc ON LOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COM— MISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE STATE MEDICAL EXAMINERS CONTRACT. SEP 51979 k BOOK 41 FADE 45. Bou 41 PAGE 45 Contract State of Florida DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES MEDICAL EXAMINERS' COMMISSION AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY This Contract entered into effect the day of , 1979 between the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Medical Examiners' Commission, represented by the officers executing this Contract and hereafter styled by the "COMMISSION", and the Indian River Board of County Commissioners, represented by the officer(s) executing this Contract and hereafter styled the "COUNTY". Any reference in this Contract to "Districts" shall mean Medical Examiner Districts as established by the Medical Examiners' Commission. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the COMMISSION has been empowered to administer funds for the continued improvement and upgrading of Medical Examiner Services by Chapters 20.19 and 406, Florida Statutes, and, WHEREAS, the COUNTY agrees to provide all services and facilities as deemed necessary to carry out the intent of Chapter 106 F.S. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual understanding and the provisions, terms, and conditions hereafter set forth, the COMMISSION and the COUNTY mutually agree to the following: 1. The COUNTY agrees to: Improve the services delivery capability and the quality of Medical Examiners' Service, 1.1 Coordinate with the District Medical Examiner in developing a budget for essential services, salaries, equipment, buildings, transportation, investigations, autopsies, toxicology, laboratory services and administrative costs related to the Medical Examiner Services Program. 1.2 In the event that an examination or autopsy is performed by the District Medical Examiner or his associate upon a body when the death occurred outside of.his District, the governmental body requesting the examination or autopsy shall pay the fee for such services. 1.3 When a body is transported to the District, transportation costs, if any, shall be borne by the COUNTY in which the death occurred. 1.4 Budget funds paid under this Contract for the sole purpose of augmenting, supporting, and improving the District Medical Services Program of this District. 1.5 Budget these funds for improving fees for service, salaries, equipment, buildings, transportation, investigations, autopsies, toxicology, laboratory services, and other expenses related to Medical Examiner Services only. x: 1 1.6 Pay from the general funds or any other funds under the control the Board of County Commissioners except those by terms of this Contract, for routine and ordinary fees, salaries, and expenses the District Medical Examiner. 1.7 Provide the COMMISSION an annual.report identifying total funds expended or encumbered for Medical Examiner Services on forms provided by the COMMISSION (exhibit A) specifying: a. Salaries and/or fees for service b. Transportation c. Facilities and equipment d. Administrative costs e. Other related expenses 1.8 Return of Funds: of of Any funds, or part thereof, not expended for the aforementioned services shall be considered COMMISSION funds, and shall be returned to the COMMISSION. Any funds improperly expended in violation of this Contract or State requirements, or any funds incorrectly expended shall be returned in full to the COMMISSION. 1.9 Comply with Title VI and VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964: a. To comply with Title VI and VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), Executive Order No. 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity", as supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (41 CFR Part 60), and Federal Regulations concerning non-discrimination because of mental and physical handicaps. b. In the event of the COUNTY'S non-compliance with the require- ments of this clause, the Contract may be terminated or suspended in whole or in part. 1.10 Monitoring: To permit the DEPARTMENT to monitor the activities on the COUNTY according to applicable regulations of the Federal and State Governments. 1.11 Retention of Records: Retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and any other documents pertinent to this Contract for a period of three (3) years after starting date of the applicable retention period, or if audit findings have not been resolved at the end.of five (5) year period, the records shall be retained until resolution of the audit findings. Persons duly authorized by the COMMISSION shall have full access to, and the right to examine any of said materials during Contract period. -2- ROOK 1 pnr-453 SEP 51979 a A SEP 51979 BOOK 41 PA -UF 454 a, .2. The COMMISSION agrees to: 2.1 Pay the COUNTY a total sum of Eight Thousand Five Hundred Ninety -Two Dollars ($ 80592.00 ). 2.2 Payment will be made: two quarters (2/4)* upon execution of this Contract; two quarters (2/4) upon receipt of the County annual expenditure report. * (State law requires release of funds on a quarterly basis.) 3. The COUNTY and COMMISSION mutually agree: 3.1 This Contract shall become effective on , 197 . 3.2 This Contract shall terminate on June 30, 1980. 3.3 This Contract is subject to the availability of funds and the deter- -mination as to such availability rests solely with the COMMISSION. If funds become unavailable, the COMMISSION may terminate this Contract on 24 hours notice. 3.4 Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Contract shall only be valid when they have been reduced to -writing, duly signed and attached to the original of this Contract. The parties agree to renegotiate this Contract if State revision of any applicable laws or regulations make changes in this Contract necessary. 3.5 This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. All items incorporated by references are physically attached. No other agreements, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract, shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREUPON, the parties have caused this three page Contract be executed by their undersigned officials as duly authorized. Attest: State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services Assistant Secretary for Operations Date: Attest: J For the Board of County Commissioners Date: 9 - -3- STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY FISCAL YEAR 1978-79 MEDICAL EXAMINER SERVICES ANNUAL EXPENDITURE REPORT COUNTY Beginning October 1, 1978 Ending September 30, 1979 County Expenses Salaries and Fees for Services $ Transportation $ Facilities and Equipment $ Administrative Costs $ Other Related Expenses $ TOTAL $ County Medical Examiner Trust Fund Account Current Balance State Expenses it 5 Authorized signature Title ADDRESS: County Contact Person Telephone INSTRUCTIONS: List all expenditures of funds for medical examiner services, including state grant-in-aid funds, county and local appropriations, or other source of fund. Some items, such as administrative costs, may have to be estimated. Also, in the place provided, list the person to be contacted should any questions arise. A place is included for the address to send warrants and new contracts. Mail report to: W. H. Braatz, Administrator Medical Examiner Services Section Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1323 Winewood Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32301 NRS Form 523, June 77 PHONE: (904) 487-2947 Bou 41 PAGE455 "'7, BOOK 41 PAH -456 ATTORNEY SAMUEL A. BLOCK APPROACHED THE BOARD REQUESTING THEM TO CONSIDER REMOVING THE IS MONTH NOTICE.FOR TERMINATION CLAUSE FROM THE SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTERS LEASE, AS PER THE FOLLOWING LETTER: 8 LAW C^� �O., '���v, OFFICES VOCELLE. . GALLAGHER & BLOCK 401 COMMERCIAL BANK BUILDING •.! i;y 1\1 POST OFFICE BOX 1900 C-� ��`•• •!u VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960 ^rj I C� ` OWE JAMES T. VOCELLE07-3.24 FRED T. GALLAGHER August 13, 1979 77n &)-,s SAMUEL A. BLOCK Mr. Jack Jennings County Administrator Indian River County Courthouse Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Mr. Jennings: On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Sunshine Rehabili- tation Center of Indian River County, Inc., I request that this non-profit corporation be placed on the agenda for the next scheduled County Commission Meeting for the purpose of requesting the Commissioners to consider removing from the Sunshine Center's lease the 18 -month notice for termination clause. Approximately 3 years ago this Board came before the Commis- sion requesting the removal of this clause from their lease. At that time the Commissioners were receptive to the idea; however, they required that the Board make this request at the time that this organization was ready to commit to the construction of the building. You will find enclosed con- .ceptural drawings from the Board's architect as to the build- ing we wish to construct on the property covered by the lease. We would need the termination clause stricken from the lease in that we would not be able to approach a lending institution for financing if the clause remains in the lease. Also, the Board would like to know that our organization could remain as lessee of the County for an indefinite. period of time since we would be making a substantial conmiitment.in the con- struction of this building. You will also find enclosed a letter from Sheriff Sam T. Joyce, stating that he approves the action that we are taking. I remain, Very truly yours, /bb Samuel A. � ORO f' I310CIC DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW BUILDING ON THIS LEASED PROPERTY, AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS CONFER WITH ATTORNEY BLOCK TO WORK UP A LEASE FOR A 30 YEAR PERIOD, AND PREPARE A NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTION. COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION TIME WAS ALSO DIS- CUSSED. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT THERE BE A ONE YEAR CONSTRUCTION PERIOD IN THE LEASE FOR THE COUNTY'S BENEFIT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE LEASE AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED, SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF ATTORNEY COLLINS. ATTORNEY SAMUEL A. BLOCK THEN REQUESTED FROM THE BOARD A ONE YEAR COMMITMENT FROM THE COUNTY AS TO THE AVAILABILITY OF THE USE OF THE SEWER LINE RUNNING IN FRONT OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, OWNED BY ORANGE TERRACE SUBDIVISION PROPERTY OWNERS. HE STATED THAT THEY NEED 32,000 GPD. CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THIS REQUEST IS CONTRARY TO RESOLUTION N0. 79-48 AND DID NOT FEEL THIS COULD BE TRANSFERABLE. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD SHOULD NOT GIVE ORANGE TERRACE 32,000 GPD, BUT RESERVE 32,000 GPD FROM THE 600,000; ATTORNEY BLOCKS CLIENTS WOULD BE SATISFIED, YET IT WOULD NOT BE A COMMITMENT - IT WOULD JUST REMAIN IN THE COUNTY�S ALLOCATION. HE CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD WOULD NOT ALLOCATE THE 32,000 GPD WITHOUT ADDITIONAL ACTION FROM THE BOARD. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS TO RESERVE 32,000 GPD SEWER ALLOCATION FROM THE COUNTY. HE THEN WITHDREW HIS MOTION. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 79-75 AMENDING RESOLUTION 79-48 TO REDUCE THE TOTAL SEWER ALLOCA- TION IN PARAGRAPH 2 FROM 600,000 GPD TO 568,000 GPD FOR ONE YEAR FROM DATE. RESOLUTION N0, 79-75 WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN AVAILABLE. SEP 51979 11 Bou 41 wF 457 -I SEP 51979 BOOK 41 FAcF 458 MRS. ESSIE 11. TURNER APPROACHED THE BOARD TO REQUEST RELEASE OF SIDE LOT EASEMENTS IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN SUBDIVISION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 79-76 APPROVING RELEASE OF SIDE LOT EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK D: GARDEN OF EDEN SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY MRS. ESSIE M. TURNER, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN; THESE DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT. Resolution No. 79-76 Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, has been requested to release the South 5 feet of lot 3 and North 5 feet of lot 4 Block D. Garden of Eden Sub -Division according to the plot thereof filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, in plot Book 3, page 91 and Whereas, the request for such release of easement has been submitted in proper form; Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved by the Board of County Comm- issioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the follow- ing South.5 feet of. lot 3 and North 5 feet of lot 4 Block D. Garden of Eden shall be release. Be it further Resolved that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court be, and they are hereby authorized and directed to execute a re- lease of said lots easements herein above referred to in form proper for recording and placing in the public records of Indian River County, Florida This 5th day of September 1979. Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, Flor'. a By William C. Wo-dtke, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: — Breda Wright' -rwtt� Zilk, &Uot&, J1. G'. MR2 M s M Release of Easement This Release of Easement, made and excuted this 5th day of September, 1979 between Indian River County, FIorlda, party of the first part and Essie Mae Turner and Tommy Lee Turner party of the second part; Witnesseth For and inconsideration of the sum of ten and no/100 ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations, in hand paid by the party of the second part, the receipt whereof be- ing hereby acknowledged, the said party of the first part does here with release, discharge and quit claim unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs, legal representatives, and assigns, forever, the easements in favor of the party of 1:he first part on real property situate in Indian River County, Florida. Which said easement are as follows: The South 5 feet of lot 3 and the North 5 feet of lot 4 Block D, Garden of Eden Sub -Division According to the plot thereof, as recorded in plot Book 3, page 63 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. In witness whereof, the party of the first part, by virtue of the authority vested by-law in the Board of County Commission- ers, and for and on behalf of the County of Indian River, State of Florida, have cause these presents to be executed in its name by its chairman and its seal to be affixed, attested by its clerk of the Circuit Court. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the presence of: Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida i lam o t e, r. ATTEST: Freda Wright, Clerk of the Circuit Court By SEP 51919`'7 - 0":''01- "t ` 60DK 1 FAGE 459 State of Florida County of Indian River foa 41 PAVE 460 I Hereby Certify that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in the state of county aforesaid to take acknowledgement, personally appeared William C. Wodtke Jr. as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, State of Florida, and acknowledged before me executing the above and foregoing instrument] in the pre- sence of two subscribing witnesses, freely and voluntarily, under the authority duly vested in him by law, and that the seal of the said Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, State of Florida, affixed thereto is the true seal of the foregoing. Witness my hand and official seal in said state and county this CZ day of September 1979. My Commission Expires: Mlie, State of Florida at Large W.V Commission Expires Sept. 8, 19+83 bonded by American fire & CnsuaNy Company ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS TO SIGN THE CERTIFICATE RE THE ADMISSION OF PAUL FILBERT TO THE FLORIDA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND. FLORIDA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND WILLUM J. MCCLURE, President ST. AUGUSTItiE, FLORIDA TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (Date).........9-5-79 Gentlemen: This is to certify that the bearer ........ EAyj... Gi,l b2rt.................................. is a resident of this county and that .... he........ is entitled to free admission to the Florida Schcol for the Deaf and the Blind. (Signed)..1/, el. - - - Q V ..'. ... ......... ........... ' ... .. ..... ...... Board of County omm,ission r of ................ „River, ,,,,,,,, .,, County. 0—Form 7 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER SOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS TO SIGN THE CERTIFICATE RE THE ADMISSION OF CASSANDRA BUTLER TO THE FLORIDA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND. SEP 51979 15 BOOK - PAGE461 r 1 non 41 PAGE 462 SEP 51979 FLORIDA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND WILLIAM J. MCCLURE, President ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES (Date) ............ ................................. Gentlemen: This is to certify that the bearer ...... CdS.Sd!2dr.a ... Bu.tl.e.r .......................... .... .. .... ... .. .. is a resident of this county and that ..she....... is entitled to free admission to the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind. (Signed) . ............... .... .. ............................................. ..................... ... ............... . ... Board of County Commi2siovers .......In d.iza-R.i.uar............ County. O—Form 7 THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED A REQUEST FROM FIRE CHIEF FORREST R. SMITH ASKING THE COUNTY TO SEND A LETTER OF ENDORSE- MENT IN AN EFFORT TO OBTAIN AN LEAA GRANT AS PER THE FOLLOWING LETTER: =6 FIRE DEPARTMENT Cate 01 ITc;-0 ntch 1216 - 207h Prey VEIZO BEACH, FLORIDA - 32960 iJ Tcl%.''iafe 563.202S i:y' � •- August 13, 1979 'N { law..•.. .., ^ Mr. Bill Wodtke, Chairman Indian River County Commissioners Court House Vero Beach, Florida 32960 b Dear Sir: The Office of the State Fire Marshal is asking the Fire Service, Municipal and County Officials for support in an effort to obtain a Federal Grant (IFAA). kloneys received will .be utilized for the training of Fire Investigators, Lab equipment for the Fire College and to modernize communication systems. The services of the State Fire Marshal's Office have greatly benefited our Community in the past. These funds, if received, will certainly upgrade the performance of the State Fire Marshal's Office, which will also aid us. We are asking that you send a letter of endorsement of this effort to : . Mr. Bill Gunter Insurance Commissioner Tallahassee Blorida 32304 ;I would appreciate your cooperation in this very import- ant matter. Yours for better fire protection, Vero Breach Fire Preveu-ion Bureau Forrest P. Smith Fire Chief a ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO SEND A LETTER OF ENDORSEMENT TO INSURANCE COMMISSIONER GUNTER, AS REQUESTED. SEP 51979 17 BaoK +1 PAGE Ql,i I -I SEP 51979 BuK 41 PAUF 464 THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED ESTABLISHING AND POSTING SPEED LIMIT SIGNS OF 35 MPH BETWEEN DITCH 18 AND 22 ON WILLOW STREET AS REQUESTED BY CITIZENS IN THE AREA. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THE COUNTY MAINTAINS WILLOW STREET BETWEEN DITCH 18 AND 22. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO INVESTIGATE THE EXACT LOCATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE COUNTY IS MAINTAINING THE ROAD AND REPORT THE FINDINGS AT THE NEXT MEETING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR OUT - OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR HERCULES KONTOULAS TO CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA TO DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS WITH THE FIRM OF CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY; TIME AND DATE TO BE DETERMINED LATER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR .JOHN HRKACH, VETERAN SERVICE OFFICER, TO ATTEND MID -WINTER TRAINING CONFERENCE IN ST. PETERSBURG, OCTOBER 17 - 19, 1979. AT THE MEETING OF AUGUST 8, 1979, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 79-6$ AUTHORIZING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR THE VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND SHELTERED WORKSHOP. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND SHELTERED WORKSHOP GRANT. � "01s � FLORIDA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES ACT OF 1974 (COMMUNITY SERVICES TRUST FUND) GRANT APPLICATION Page 1 of 7 REPLY TO: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES 2571 EXECUTIVE CENTER CIRCLE, EAST TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 1. Local Governmental Unit Applying for Grant: * SUBMIT FOUR (4) COPIES (ONE MUST BE ORIGINAL) * PLEASE TYPE - ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS Name: Vero Beach Indian River Co Telephone: 005) 562-7927 name of town, city or county) Address: P.O. Box 1028, Vero Beach, Fla. zip: 32960 ° County: Indian Piver 2. Delegate Agency(s): Vocational Training and Sheltered 1•1orkshop 3. Person with over-all responsibility of grant: (Our Department will contact this person should questions arise) Name: John M. Rezanka Telephone: e,05) 562-6k54 Address: 1385 16th Ave, Vero Beach, Fla 32960 Signature: 4. Name and address of persor/authorized to receive funds. If this ap- plication is funded, checks will be mailed to this person. All checks will be made payable to the local government. Name: Kathleen Garett (Finance Officer) Address: P.O. Box 1028 Courthouse Annex Vero Beach, Fla. zip:32960 BOOK 41 PAGE65, � � J -I SEP 51979 GRANT APPLICATION Page 2 of 7 (use attachment page if necessary) BOOK 41 PAGE 466 1. Give a brief overview of the proposed program. To provide formal and informal compensation and remedial education for developmentally disabled adults, such as enriching;leerning experiences, adult basic education and developmental training. 2. Identify the problem this program will address. There is no program in Indian River County to serve post -school age retarded adults, to provide opportunities for each client to develop skills, attitudes and behaviours which will enable him to function more succesfully as a citizen. 3. Specify the target population in your program service area af- fected by this problem. How large is the target population? There are approximately 50 handicapped persons in Indian River County who could benifit from our ser,,.ice. These are adults over 18 years of age, significantly impaired, and in need of habilitative Services. 4. What is the severity of the problem among the target population. Provide quantifiable numbers/percetages etc. The degree of retardation ranges from mild-moderate to severe an,': profound. 66% of the target population are mild to moderately involved, end 24% are severely to profoundly retarded. 5. How will this program address the problem? Through the use of individual educational plans, each client willrecieve training to develop maximum us( of their abilities. Progress is scrutinized on an ongoing basis. Program areas include self-help, communication, Recreation, horticulture, Ceramics, daily living, basic sight reading and number recognition. 6. How many and what percentage of the target population will be served? 50 to 60 percent of the target population can be sensed during the 1979-80 year. This amoiint will increase as our program e-spands and 3rows. 7. Will this program provide direct access or availability of other services? If yes, identify them. Clients are referred to supportive services during their program at the Workshop. when a _Tient develops the necessary pre-vocati.onrl skills, Lie or she is referred to the State of Fla. Vocational Rehabilita- tion Program for transition into employment. 8. Is the program operating now? If yes, explain what changes this grant will provide for. yes. This grant will enable the Workshop to serve persons whose program cannot be funded by a different source. 9. Will the grant funds be used as match to obtain other funds? If yes, what other funds? No. 10. What funds will sustain the program after this grant expires? Dept of HRS Purchase of Service funding. 11. Who will do the audit of the program? Schecter Beame Pfeiffer and Burstein. M GRANT APPLICATION Page 3 of 7 Local Governmental Unit Applying T,ndian River (minty_ (town, county or city) A. Program Objectives (Quantify all objectives) B. Major Activities and Substeps Required to accomplish objectives To pro-ide training acti,;ities to 1. Indentification, and the evaluation. of 25 to 30 1-.andicapped adults in clients, with referral for supportive In-3ian River County, in skill area services. of Self -Help, Socialazation, 2. Intake, assessment and Individualized Communication, recreation, Motor prorrm plans for each client. coordination, independent living a3. Habilitation and training with monitoring pre -vocational Clients will be of pro-ress monthly. exposed to a variety of activities 4. Elimination of inappropriate behaviors. to develop their independence and 5. Training in proper adult, Social and a helthy self-concept. emotional attitude. 6. Referral to a State Vocational Rehabita- tion Program for competitive employment. 7. Transition into work oriented program. 1 Vocational Training and Sheltered Delegate Agency Tolorkshor In Indian Piver Co. Inc. Program Title Rehabilation and Training r_„ CM �X C. Planned Results. Show what por- tion of your objectives will be CD accomplished each quarter. (Quantify all accomplishments.) As of 12/31/79 25 clients will be evaluated, screened srd assessed, and provided with a written Indi,:idual Program Plan for one year. As of 3/31/80 25 clzents will recieve Habitilation and training with progress monitored monthly. Areas will include but not be limited to Self -Help, Recreation, Social, emotional, communication and Vocational. As of 6/30/80 c gents will recieve trainintM in all areas. Inappropriate behaviors Lo identified will be eliminated significantly. 0- W' As of 9/30/80 25 clients will recieve addition -al Individualized Programming referral to state Vocati nal gehabilitation or transition into work oriented program. SEP 51979 GRANT APPLICATION Page 4 of 7 Baa 41 P°1F 468 Name of Applicant: Vocational Training and Sheltered Workshop TOTAL BUDGET 1. Include figures from all delegate agency budgets. 2. Explain by attachment all expenditures over $200 per line item. REVENUE 1. State Grant 2. Cash -Match -(no -federal -funds, except -revenue-sharing, allowed) 3. In -Kind Match - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4. TOTAL REVENUE GRANTEE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CASH IN-KIND 5. Salaries 6. Rental -Space _____________ 7. Travel________________ 8. Supplies_______________ 9. Other (specify -on attachment) - _ _ _ 10. Total (lines -5 -through -9) - - _ _ _ - DELEGATE ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE 11. Salaries 444.22 12. Rental -Space - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13. Travel________________ 14. Supplies_______ _ 15. Other (sRecify_on attachment) _ _ _ _ 16. Total (lines 11 through 16) 444.22 *17. TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (lines 10 444.22 and 16) 18. Salaries 19. Rental Space 20. Travel-_-__________--_ 21. Equipment 22. Other (specify on attachment) 23. Total (lines 18 through 22) 444.22 DELEGATE PROGRAM EXPENSE 24. Salaries 25. Rental Space 26. Travel___ -_ 27. Equipment 2500.00 28. _ _ _ _ _ _ Other (specify on attachment) _ - _ _ 1497.28 29. Total (lines 24 through 28)3997.28 _ _ _ _ _ __ 30. TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSES (lines 23 and 29)4441.50 OU 31. TOTAL EXPENDITURES (cash -and -in-kind) • *Line 17 must not exceed 15% of two times line 1. 1480.50 2g6l j 1.480.50 1480.50 -I 1 1 I. Cash Match Source 1. County Commission 2. 3. 4. II. In -Kind Salaries and Benefits Position Title and Name of Person 1. 2. 3. 4. IIJ.. Other In -Kind Description 1. Buildi 2. 3. 4. IV. TOTAL IN-KIND 1480.50 (II. plus III.) V. TOTAL MATCH 2961.00 ( I. plus IV.) GRANT APPLICATION Page 5 of 7 Local Governmental Unit Applying: Tnri; nn R; 17r --r (Town, County, or City) w Cash and In -Kind Match, Amount I.- 2. 3. 4. Hourlv Rate 1. 2. 3. 4. Source Unit Cost 1. Netto Construction 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. Number of Hours To Be Worked 1. 2. 3. 4. O O I. Total Cash Match 1480.50 Total (Hourly rate (X) number of hours to be worked) 1. 2. 3. 4. II. Total Salaries Total (Unit cost No. of Units (X) number of Units) t39 1. 3000 so ft. 1. 1430.50 LO 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. LIJ III. Total Other 1480.50 C* t SEP 51979 GRANT APPLICATION Page 6 of 7 Boor 41 470 Local Governmental Unit Applying: Indian Riverotnty (Town, County, or City) Delegate Agency Budget - Complete one for each Delegate Agency 11rogram Name: Name of Dele;ate Agency: Vocational Training -&Sheltered Workshop In Indinn Ri-el Address: 1385 16th, Vero Becch. Fla zip:32960 Co. Inc. Contact Person: John M. Rezanka Telephone: 0 05) 652-6854 Tax Exempt Number: if none, attach a copy of the certificate of incorporation) �iD:IINIST 1ATIVE EXPENSES CASII IN -::IND 1. Salaries 444.22 2. Rental________________ 3. Travel 4. Suaplies_______________ 5. Other (specify_on attachment) _ _ _ _ 6. TOTAI. (lines_1_through_5) _ _ _ _ _ _ 444.22 PROGRAM EXPENSES 7. Salaries 8. Rentral :space_____________ 1480.50 9. Travel 10. Equipment _ 2500.00 11. Other (saecify_on attachment) _ _ _ _ 1497.28 12. TOTAL (lines_7_through_ll)_ _ _ _ _ _ 3997.28 13. TOTAL EXPENSES—(line-6—and—line 12) 5922.00 THE DELEGATE. AGENCY HEREBY APPROVES TRIS APPLICATION AND 'FILL COMPLY WITH ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND CONTRACTS RELATING TIERETO: ? APPROVED BY: Paul A. Barbee �i,+r.1 President of Board ATT ^STED BY. John M. Rezanka N ame Director Title GRANT F.PPLICAITION Page 7 of 7 Local ..governmental Unit Applying: : ndinn River County. 14. TIIE: APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT THE DATA IN THIS APPLICATION AND ITS VARIOUS SECTIONS INCLUDING BUDGET DATA, ARE 'TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE AND THAT THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED AND UNDERSTANDS THAT IT WILL BECOME PART OF THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT AND THE APPLICANT. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (OR THE CITY COUNCIL)'EEAS PASSED RESOLUTION NUMBER 79-68 WHICH AUTHORIZES THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE SPECIFIED PROGRAMS. IF FEES OR CONTRIBUTIONS ARE TO BE UTILIZED AS MATCHING FOR THIS GRANT, OR IF A DELEGATE AGENCY IS TO PROVIDE THE MATCHING SliARE, AND THESE FUNDS ARE NOT FORTHCOMING, THIS RESOLUTION ALSO SPECIFIES THAT THE CITY OR COUNTY WILL PROVIDE THE NECES- SARY MATCH. THIS APPLICANT FURTHER CERTIFIES, DUE TO NEW LEGISLATIVE INTENT NOT TO DUPLICATE SERVICES AND THAT THESE PARTICULAR SERVICES ARE NOT BEING PROVIDED NOR ARE THEY AVAILABLE FROM ANY OTHER STATE AGENCY. ALTHOUGH SIMILAR SERVICES MAY BE AVAILABLE, THE APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT NO OTHER RESOURCE EXISTS TO PROVIDE THESE PARTI- CULAR SERVICES TO THESE CLIENTS WITHOUT THE USE OF THIS MONEY. William C. Wodtke Jr :Name typed Signature Chairman - Board of Colinty Cnmmissionarp Tit e Mayor or Chairman of Board of County Commissioners) Indian River County Courthouse 2145 14th Ave., Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Ad d res: (305) 569-1940 Telephone ATTESTED BY: Freda Wright ^. Name typed Signature Clerk Title SEP 51979 nu 41 471 ' ' I SEP 51979 6005 41 pn 472 Salaries - 444.22 - Director Operating Expence - 1497.28 - Telephone Equipment - 2500.00 - As follow: 500.00 - Teaching materials and supplies 600.00 - Furniture 700.00 - Landscape -Horticulture equipment 200.00 - Ceramics supplies and egdipment 500.00 - Typewriter TOTAL 2500.00 ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT HE WROTE TO SEVERAL COUNTIES REGARDING FLORIDA STATUTE 790.06, WHICH PERTAINS TO THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE TO CARRY A CONCEALED WEAPON. HE CONTINUED THAT THE MATERIAL OBTAINED FROM BREVARD COUNTY AND ORANGE COUNTY HAS MERIT, AND SUGGESTED THAT HE BE AUTHORIZED TO PREPARE A DRAFT OF AN ORDINANCE, AS WELL AS AUTHORIZE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER. HE NOTED THAT THE ORDINANCE FROM BREVARD COUNTY HAS BEEN DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BREVARD COUNTY, AND THE DECISION IS ON APPEAL TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A DRAFT OF THE SUBJECT MATERIAL WHICH WILL WITHHOLD THE LEGAL ATTACKS, AND ADVERTISE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPLEMENTA- TION OF NEW PROCEDURES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A LICENSE TO CARRY A CONCEALED WEAPON. ATTORNEY COLLINS FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT THESE ARE REGULATIONS JUST FOR CONCEALED FIREARMS, AND ANYTHING THAT IS NOT CONCEALED WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD ALSO RECOMMEND THAT NO FURTHER PERMITS BE ISSUED, INCLUDING THOSE PENDING,UNTIL THE ORDINANCE IS IMPELEMENTED. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THAT THE CLERK'S OFFICE BE INSTRUCTED TO HOLD ALL RENEWALS FOR GUN PERMITS UNTIL THE COUNTY HAS ADOPTED A NEW ORDINANCE REGARDING THIS PROCEDURE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT IF AN EMERGENCY AROSE, THE MATTER COULD COME BEFORE THE BOARD. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT DISCUSSED AMENDING AND ADVERTISING THE ENERGY CODE. SEP 51979 27 �ooK 4- PACE 4 _I SEP 51979 Boos 41 pn 474 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO DRAFT THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND TO ADVERTISE THE ENERGY CODE. ATTORNEY COLLINS BROUGHT BEFORE THE BOARD THE ISSUE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTIONS FOR ELECTION POLL WORKERS. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON EXPLAINED THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION IN TALLAHASSEE IS ASKING THE COUNTY TO PAY SOCIAL SECURITY FOR ELECTION POLL WORKERS ACCORDING TO OUR AGREE- MENT SIGNED JANUARY 1, 1952. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT A SIMPLE AMENDMENT TO THIS AGREEMENT TO EXEMPT POLL WORKERS SHOULD BE ALL THAT IS NECESSARY TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE PREPARATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THIS AGREEMENT EXCLUDING CASUAL INDEPENDENT CONTRACTUAL LABOR FROM THE PAYMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY, AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN THEN APPROACHED THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR THE PRE -APPLICATION FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1980 AND REQUESTED PERMISSION TO ADVERTISE, AS FOLLOWS: i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman WILLIARD W. SIEBERT, JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS JACK G. JENNINGS. Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 329 M E M O R A N D U M TO:' Board of Cun Commissioners FROM: Edward J. ��gan DATE:. August 30, 1979 RE: Community Development Pre -Application Fiscal Year 1980 Public Hearings We are working on the pre -application for the Community Development for Fiscal Year 1980. In order to comply with the laws and requirements of the United States. Department of Housing and Urban Development we need to have two Public Hearings. Because of the constraints of time and the needs of the citizens we recommend that the first Public Hearing be on September 19th at 10:00 a.m. in the morning for the authorization of the grant application. This meeting most probably will be attended by members of the Community Development Advisory Committee. We recommend the second Public Hearing for 5:01 p.m. that evening once again for the authorization of the grant application. This will allow citizens whose activities preclude their attendance during the normal working hours to have in -put. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADVERTISEMENT OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PRE -APPLICATION AS OUTLINED IN THE MEMO OF AUGUST 30, 1979, AND CHANGED THE TIME FROM 5:01 TO 5:15 P.M. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN NEXT REQUESTED PERMISSION TO,LEASE SPACE TO IMPLEMENT THE SECTION S EXISTING 29 BOOK 41 FAGE:475 SEP 51979 HOUSING PROGRAM. �ornc41 �Rcf 478 HE CONTINUED THAT FUNDS FOR FURNITURE AND THE EQUIPMENT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED AND ARE DEPOSITED, AND STAFFING IS COMPLETE. MR. REGAN STATED THAT THE MOST PRACTICAL PLACE TO LEASE IS THE OLD TODAY OFFICES, FOR $350 A MONTH, OR $4,200 A YEAR. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THIS WOULD BE AN EXPENSE OF THE COUNTY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE LEASING OF SPACE OWNED BY VICTOR PALISANO IN THE OLD TODAY OFFICES FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR WITH AN OPTION TO LEASE UNTIL THE OLD HOSPITAL IS COMPLETED, INSTEAD OF LEASING FOR ANOTHER YEAR, AND TRY TO HAVE THE SPACE BEGINNING OCTOBER 1ST. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT MR. REGAN SHOULD TRY FOR THE OCTOBER 1ST DATE BUT HE WOULD HAVE THE FREEDOM TO NEGOTIATE FOR THE LEASE BEGINNING SEPTEMBER 15, 1979. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER APPROACHED THE BOARD TO DISCUSS AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE FOR DRAINAGE CRITERIA FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, HE SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED REPUIREMENTS: APPENDIX A, SECTION 23, SITE PLAN APPROVAL * (1) Additional requirements for affected development 1. It may be necessary for some projects to seek permits from govern- mental agencies other than the County. In such cases, zoning and building permits will not be issued for these projects until the applicant submits proof of approval or certification from those agencies involved to the Planning Department when applicable.to the project. Agencies from which permits may be required include, but are not limited to, the -following: 1) Department of Environmental Regulation 2) Department of Transportation 3) Corps of Engineers 4) St. John's River Water Management District 5) Florida Health & Rehabilition Services 6) Indian River Farms Drainage District 7) St. John's Drainage District 8) Sebastian River Drainage District 9) Fellsmere Water Management District 2. A site plan which shows lands to be dedicated for road right-of-way will be issued a zoning permit only after the deed(s) for the right- of-way has been recorded as part of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. ADDITION TO APPENDIX A, SECTION 23 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE 71-3 SUBSECTION (K) STORMWATER RUNOFF CONTROL CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES The Site Drainage Plan shall include at least the following provisions: 1. The project shall include practical means of reducing the amount of pollution generated by the project to a level compatible with Florida Water Quality Standards found in Chapter 17-3, 17-4, and 17-6 dated March, 1979, of the Florida Administrative Code; i.e., Department of Environmental Regulation requirements shall be met including the retention and disposal by percolation of at least the first one inch of runoff. Skimming devices may be required where applicable and practical. 2. Runoff generated by the project (which may be defined as any new structures, additions to existing structures and/or other site improvements proposed by the applicant) shall be disposed of on the site by percolation unless sufficient capacity is available in the existing drainage facilities (or any practical combination thereof). The maximum quantity of runoff to be disposed of shall be that computed based upon a 25 year frequency storm with the minimum amount being that computed upon a 3 year frequency storm. Rainfall intensity -duration information for calculating runoff shall be based upon the curves prepared by Florida DOT for the Jacksonville Zone 3 area. Site capability for runoff retention shall be determined by current suitable -site percolation tests and as further determined by the practicality of the on site storm water facilities. The following percolation test procedure is required to be submitted with the conceptual site drainage plan: i. The test holes should be located as close as possible to the proposed location of exfiltration trench (vertical and horizontal) and if critical to a depth two (2) feet below the water table (MSL) at the time of the test. ii. A hole for each test of about 12" diameter or as required for a maximum clearance of 1/2" between the hole and the test casing is augered to the required depth and the casing is lowered into the hole with a minimum of 12" extending above the surface of the existing grade. . iii. The test casing shall consist of an approved pipe that is at least 8" in diameter with perforations for about the bottom 75% of the length as measured from the surface. The bottom of the casing shall be pointed. Exfiltration increments shall be measured with a suitable gauging device. iv. Fill the test bore to 6" above the surface of existing.grade and run test no later than two (2) hours after level has exfiltrated to below surface of existing grade. In all cases test runs to start only after the first 2" have exfiltrated. v. Run tests for at least 30 minutes and record as a minimum -- date, weather, project name, test run by, test number, location on site, sketch of hole and casing, ground water conditions, incremental drop and time, and subsurface soil information. Information shall be tabulated and attested to bya registered professional engineer licensed to prac- tice in the State of Florida. The County Planning Department must be notified at least 24 hours in advance of the tests SEP 51979 31 Bou- 41 PnF 477 BOOK 41 FFm F 478 being conducted and reserves the right to witness the test procedure. Exfiltration rates for designing the site drain- age facilities shall be determined by the developer's designer from these tests. Alternate percolation tests procedures may be used if approved in writing by the Planning Department prior to their use. 3. In order to determine -the limits required of the disposal facilities, the Planning Department will make a judgement, with the aid of com- petent engineering advice, based on the data submitted by the applicant with the drainage plan. The data shall at least consist of hydrographs for each of the above storm criteria and disposal curves (actual and required) based upon current suitable site percolation tests as de- scribed in 2. through 2 v. The Planning Department will make recom- mendations to the County Planning and Zoning Board for their consider- ation in formulating their decision. APPENDIX A, SECTION 23, SITE PLAN APPROVAL (f) (Site plan to include certain information; criteria to be used in judging site plan.) A site plan, for the purpose of this section, shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following where applicable: 1. Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development. 2. Name of development. 3. Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development. 4. A site plan superimposed on a survey, with legal description prepared by a registered surveyor or engineer, of the property drawn to a scale MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THE APPLICANT, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 100 FEET TO THE INCH. THE SITE PLAN WILL SHOW: A) Exact location of all buildings and structures, INCLUDING THE USE OF EACH, AND REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS. B) All means of ingress or egress INDICATING WIDTHS; C) All screen and buffer areas AND ALL UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND/OR ACCESS EASEMENTS; D) Off-street parking/off-street loading areas ( (APP.A), SECTION 24, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE); CORNER VISIBILITY ( APP.A); (SECTION 25 (M) (1), INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE). E) Refuse collection areas; F) PROVISION FOR AND LOCATION OF WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY SEWAGE SYSTEM; G) LOCATION SKETCH WITHIN THE SECTION; H) NORTHPOINT, SCALE AND DATE. * 5. A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWING NATURAL LAND FEATURES AND ELEVATIONS. 6. All site plans for construction of structures that exceed five thou- sand dollars ($5,000.00) must be prepared by an architect or engineer under seal to practice in Florida. 7. Landscaping plan, including type, sizes, and locations of vegetation and decorative shrubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation and maintenance. LOCATION AND TYPES OF ALL EXISTING TREES, WITH TRUNK CIRCUMFERENCE OF 12 INCHES OR MORE MEASURED AT 4 1/2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, SHALL BE SH014N WHETHER DESIGNATED TO BE REMOVED OR RETAINED AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 32 a 8. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN ( (APP. A), SECTION 23 (K), INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE). 9. Location, size, description AND ILLUSTRATION of all signs. 10. A site development plan which includes the following written -data: * A) EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION; B) SIZE OF PROPERTY IN ACRES OR SQUARE FEET; C) Total number of dwelling units (with breakdown of hotel rooms, efficiencies, bedrooms, baths, apartments, etc.); D) Density count (dwelling units per gross acre of area); E) Total ground floor coverage of all buildings; F) Total number of parking spaces AND SURFACING MATERIAL; G) Gross open space, including everything except building coverage. Give acreage and percent of total development; H) Vehicular open space (DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREAS); I) Recreational open space (swimming pools, tennis courts, etc..). 11. Typical floor plans, indicating square footage, and elevation DRAWINGS for each type of structure. * -12. DATA REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 5 IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY'S WATER AND SEWER FRANCHISE REGULATIONS (ORDINANCE NO. 72-8, AS REVISED APRIL, 1978), WHEN THE PROJECT PROPOSES TO UTILIZE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE WATER FRANCHISE AND/OR SEWERAGE SYSTEMS. 13. Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use of activity involved. 14. Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the site plan or as may be required by the Commission. WORD CHANGES APPENDIX A, SECTION 23, SITE PLAN APPROVAL (a) (1) Change second sentence to read: This review is required for any development of a multiple residential use, a business, commercial or industrial use, except that a building permit for a single-family dwelling on a single lot, or lots under same ownership, in the following zoning districts may be granted without site plan approval: (a) (2) Change first sentence to read: Before such site plan shall be approved, a complete application containing all criteria to be used in judging the site plan shall be filed with the County Planning Department at least twenty (20) calendar days before the meeting at which the Commission considers the application (a period of more than 20 days may be necessary should the site plan require consideration by the Technical Rev-1ew Committee). SEP 51979 33 BOOK 41 PAGE 419 SEP 51979 41 PA -Mo DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE MATERIAL SUBMITTED, AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER AND ATTORNEY COLLINS REVIEW IT TOGETHER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE PUBLICATION AND -ADVERTISEMENT OF SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS IN THE LM -L AND M-1 DISTRICTS. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER EXPLAINED THAT HIS DEPARTMENT PLANS TO COME UP WITH THE DEFINITION OF A MAJOR OR MINOR APPLICA- TION IN ORDER TO STREAMLINE THE PROCESS, SO THAT THERE WILL NOT BE A LONG WAITING PERIOD. HE POINTED OUT THAT SOME OF THE PROBLEMS RELATE TO THE APPLICANT NOT FURNISHING THE RIGHT INFORMA- TION TO THEIR DEPARTMENT. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE PROVISION REGARDING DRAINAGE MAY CREATE PROBLEMS BECAUSE MORE DEFINITIVE CRITERIA IS NEEDED; THE MAJOR PROBLEM IS THAT THE DEVELOPERS, ARE ONLY GOING TO HAVE TO MEET THE 25 YEAR STORM CRITERIA. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER STATED THAT THE PLANNING $ ZONING COMMISSION WILL MAKE THEIR RECOMMENDATION BASED ON MEAN- INGFUL CRITERIA, AND IF THERE IS A PROBLEM, THE NEXT STEP WOULD BE TO COME TO THE BOARD. HE FELT THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THE DECISION TO THE BOARD AS WELL AS'THE APPLICANT. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT EVERYTHING SHOULD STAND REVIEW, OTHERWISE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ALL KINDS OF HODGE-PODGE DEVELOP - Mae PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER THEN EXPLAINED ABOUT THE HYDRO - GRAPH TO THE BOARD. DISCUSSION CONTINUED ABOUT THE 3 AND 25 YEAR STORM, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAIN THAT WOULD FALL IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. HE NOTED THAT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH IS USING THE 3 TO 25 YEAR CRITERIA. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER THEN DISCUSSED NOT ISSUING A ZONING PERMIT UNTIL THEIR DEPARTMENT HAD SOME VERIFICATION, WHICH IW4 WOULD HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE APPLICATION, USING A PHRASE SUCH AS "UNTIL APPLICANT SUBMITS APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATION OF PERMIT." ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED EMERGENCY ORDINANCE No. 79-26 AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE 71-3 AS AMENDED, AND TO INCLUDE AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 231 PARAGRAPH 1. SEP 51979 35 BOOK PAGE 4bi I -I ROOK i P° aF-� SEP 51979 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 79-26 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE 71-3 AS AMENDED BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Indian River County Ordinance 71-3 is hereby amended in toto as follows: SECTION 23, SITE PLAN APPROVAL It is the intent of this Ordinance to aid in the achievement of goals set forth in the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County. It is further the intent of this Ordinance to determine and control environmental, ecological -economic impact, to insure continuity of traffic patterns and development compatible with surrounding property and provide for conformity to County develop- ment, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Whenever site plan approval is required in this Ordinance, the following procedures and requirements shall be followed: A. SITE PLAN REVIEW - PROCEDURE: When site plan approval is required, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, or used, or land or water used, or any change of use consummated, nor shall any building permit be issued therefor, unless a site plan for such building, structure or use shall have been reviewed and approved by the Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission, hereinafter referred to as the Commission. 1. No public notice or hearing is hereby required for con- sideration by the Commission but such matters shall be conducted in a public session. This review is required for any development of a multiple residential use, a business, commercial or industrial use, except that a building permit for a single-family dwelling on a single lot, or lots under same ownership, in the following zoning districts may be granted without site plan approval: A - Agricultural R - 1 E - Single Family R-1AA - Single Family R -1A - Single Family R-1 - Single Family 2. Before such site plan shall be approved, a complete application containing all criteria to be used in judging the site plan shall be filed with the County Planning Department at least twenty (20) calendar days before the meeting at which the Commission considers the application (a period of more than 20 days may be necessary should the site plan require con- sideration by the Technical Review Committee). Any application, in the discretion of the County Administrator, may during the 20 day filing period be considered and commented upon by the various County Departments. 3. An application shall be in a form substantially in accordance with the form prescribed by the County Planning Depart- ment's office, copies of which may be obtained from the Planning Department of the County. The notarized authority for a person other than the owner (s) to sign such application must be attached to and accompany said application. 4. Any application shall be accompanied by a fee to be paid to the County; said fee established by the Board of County Commissioners by Resolution. B. Any such building, structure, or use shall be erected, altered, installed and maintained in full conformity with the provision of the Zoning Ordinance and with a site plan as approved by the Commission. C. In reviewing such site plan, the Commission shall consider the location, size, height, spacing, appearance, character and utilization of any building, structure, or use and their appurte- nances, access and circulation of vehicles and pedestrians, streets, parking areas, yards and open spaces, landscaping and relationship to adjacent property, and access to adequate utility systems. D. The Commission shall not approve such plan unless it finds that such site plan conforms to all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, that the safety and convenience of the public are properly provided for, that adequate off-street parking and loading facilities are provided for owners, tenants, visitors and employees, and that adequate protection and separation are pro- vided for contiguous and nearby residential property. -2- SEP 5 1979 BooK 41�acF��_ BSEP 51979 Ai 484 E. The Commission may attach to its approval of a site plan any reasonable conditions, limitations or requirements which are found necessary in its judgment to effectuate the purposes of this section and carry out the spirit and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. F. (Site plan to include certain information; criteria to be used in judging site plan). A site plan, for the purpose of this section, shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the 1. Statements of ownership and control of the proposed development. 2. Name of development. 3. Statement describing in detail the character and intended use of the development. 4. A site plan superimposed on a survey, with legal description prepared by a regustered surveyor or engineer, of the property drawn to a scale MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THE APPLICANT, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 100 FEET TO THE INCH. THE SITE PLAN WILL SHOW: a) Exact location of all buildings and structures, IN- CLUDING THE USE OF EACH, AND REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS. b) All means of ingress or egress INDICATING WIDTHS; c) All screen and buffer areas AND ALL UTILITY, DRAINAGE AND/OR ACCESS EASEMENTS; d) Off-street parking/off-street loading areas ( APP.A) SECTION 24, INDIAN RIVER _COUNTY CODE); COMNER VISABILITY ( APP.A), SECTION 25 (M) (1),_ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE). e) Refuse collection areas; f) PROVISION FOR AND LOCATION OF WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY SEWAGE SYSTEM; g) LOCATION SKETCH WITHIN THE SECTION; h) NORTHPOINT, SCALE AND DATE. 5. A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWING NATURAL AND LAND FEATURES AND ELEVATIONS. 6. All site plans for construction of structures that exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) must be prepared by an architect or engineer under seal to practice in Florida. 7. Landscaping plan,oincluding type, sized and locations of vegetation and decorative shubbery, and showing provisions for irrigation a _ n �ntenance. LOCATION ANDS OF ALL -3- EXISTING TREES, WITH TRUNK CIRCUMFERENCE OF 12 INCHES OR MORE MEASURED AT 4 1/2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, SHALL BE SHOWN WHETHER DESIGNATED TO BE REMOVED OR RETAINED AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 8. STORM DRAINAGE PLAN (APP.A), SECTION 23 (K), INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE). 9. Location, size, description and ILLUSTRATION of all signs. 10. A site development plan which includes the following written data: a) EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATION; b) SIZE OF PROPERTY IN ACRES OR SQUARE FEET; c) Total number of dwelling units (with breakdown of hotel rooms, efficiencies, bedrooms, baths, apartments, etc.); d) Density count (dwelling units per gross area of area); e) Total ground floor coverage of all buildings; f) Total number of parking spaces and SURFACING MATERIAL; g) Gross open space, including everything except building coverage. Give acreage and percent of total development; h) Vehicular open space (DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREAS); i) Recreational open space (swimming pools, tennis courts, etc.). 11. Typical floor plans, indicating square footage, and ele- vations DRAWINGS for each type of structure. 12. DATA REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 5 IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY'S WATER AND SEWER FRANCHISE REGULATIONS (ORDINACE NO. 72-8), AS REVISED APRIL, 1978), WHEN THE PROJECT PROPOSES TO UTILIZE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE WATER FRANCHISE AND/OR SEWERAGE SYSTEMS. 13. Such additional data, maps, plans, or statements as may be required for the particular use of activity involved. 14. Such additional data as the applicant may believe is pertinent to the site plan or as may be required by the Commission. CRITERIA The following criteria shall be used by the Commission for the purpose of review of the site plans: 1. The Commission shall review site plans subject to criteria -4- SEP 51979 °°x 41 FacE48 a SEP 51979 BOOK �r, easy including, but not limited to, the Zoning, Landscaping and Subdivision Ordinances, and may require those changes that are deemed necessary for the protection and promotion of the health, safety and general welfare of the public. 2. For the purpose of this Ordinance, private streets for multiple residences shall meet minimum right-of-way widths as required by the Subdivision Ordinance and Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian River County. The purpose of this subsection is to establish minimum setback lines for public conveniences and shall not be interpreted as pro- hibiting curbing, landscaping, parking or walkways within the distances established by this section. Further, the Commission may require dedication of right-of-way when found necessary by that Commission to collect and convey traffic to established or proposed traffic ways. 3. All land improvements shall be subject to Indian River County Subdivisions road standards. G. MODIFICATION OF SITE PLAN: Any change in use of buildings, structures, land or water, or institution of new uses, or alteration of or additional buildings or structures or erection of new buildings or structures, shall be in accordance with a new or modified site plan conforming and approved pursuant to this section. H. TIME LIMIT: The site plan approval shall terminate twelve (12) months thereafter if construction has not been started. Extensions of time may be made by the Board of County Commissioners at its discretion. In the event the property receiving site plan approval shall be sold, transferred, leased or the ownership thereof changed in any way, the site plan approval shall become null and void. I. SITE PLAN APPROVAL - PROCEDURE: Upon the approval of such site plan by the Commission, a building permit may be issued by the Building Department of the County, provided, however, any applicant for site plan approval, -5- or any other person having any aggrieved interest therein, may file an appeal to the Board of County Commissioners to review the action of the Commission in allowing or disallowing such application for site plan approval, which appeal shall be in writing and filed with the Building Department within ten (10) days from the date of the final action of the Commission, and shall be transmitted to the Board of County Commissioners by the Building Department. - The Board of County Commissioners shall thereupon set a date for a public hearing with regard to such appeal, after giving public notice thereof in such manner as the Board of County Commissioners shall prescribe, at which time all interested parties shall have the right to appear before the Board of County Commissioners in regard thereto and the Board of County Commissioners shall thereupon render its decision therein. The decision of the Board of County Com- missioners shall be final, unless otherwise appealed to the Courts. No permit shall be granted by the Building Department of the County until the time for appeal from the decision of -the Commission as herein provided shall have expired. When an appeal is so filed, no such permit shall be issued until after final determination of such appeal has been made. J. INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION: 1. Upon approval of a site -plan by the Commission and before construction begins, the applicant shall notify the Indian River County Zoning Department, in writing, of the intent to begin construction and a proposed construction sehedule. The Zoning Department shall conduct periodic inspections to insure the project is completed in accordance with the approved site plan. 2. Minor variations are permitted after Zoning Department approval in writing, which approval shall be affixed to the site plan. Cease and desist orders may be issued by the Zoning Department when violations are discovered and all work not in conformity with the approved site plan shall cease until Zoning Department approval is given or a revised site plan is approved by the Commission. 3. The applicant's architect or engineer of record shall notify the Zoning Department when the project is completed �oo�� 41 FAa 487 SEP 51979 eooK r Fn;r 8 and shall certify under seal that it conforms to the approved site plan and that any variations have been approved in writing by the Zoning Department. The Zoning Department shall make a final inspection and certify the project was completed in accordance with the approved site plan and the Final Certification of Approval shall be attached to the site plan and a copy sent to the applicant. 4. A fee for said inspection shall be established by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. K. STORMWATER RUNOFF CONTROL CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES: The Site Drainage Plan shall include at least the following provisions: 1. The project shall include practical means of reducing the amount of pollution generated by the project to a level compatible with Florida Water Quality Standards found in Chapter 1703, 17-4, and 17-6 dated March, 1979, of the Florida Administrative Code; i.e., Department of Environ- mental Regulation requirements shall be met including the retention and disposal by percolation of at least the first one inch of runoff. Skimming devices may be required where applicable and practical. 2. Runoff generated by the project (which may be defined as any new structures, additions to existing structures and/or other site improvements proposed by the applicant) shall be disposed of on the site by percolation unless sufficient capacity is available in the existing drainage facilities (or any practical combination thereof). The maximum quanity of runoff to be disposed of shall be that computed based upon a 25 year frequency storm with the minimum amount being that computed upon a 3 year frequency storm. Rainfall intensity -duration information for calculating runoff shall be based upon the curves prepared by Florida DOT for the Jacksonville Zone 3 area. Site capability for runoff retention shall be determined by current suitable site percolation tests and as further determined by the practicality of the on site storm water facilities. The following percolation test procedure is required to r L, M L-_1 be submitted with the conceptual site drainage plan: a) The test holes should be located as close as possible to the proposed location of exfiltration trench (vertical and horizontal) and if critical to a depth two 2 feet below the water table (MSL) at the time of the test. b) A hole for each test of about 12" diameter or as required for a maximum clearance of 1/2" between the hole and the test casing is augered to the required depth and casing is lowered into the hole with a minimum of 12" extending above the surface of the existing grade. c) The test casing shall consist of an approved pipe that is at least 8" in diameter with perforations for about the bottom 75% of the length as measured from the sur- face. The bottom of the casing shall be pointed. Exfiltration increments shall be measured with a suitable gauging device. d) Fill the test bore to 6" above the surface of existing grade and run test no later than two (2) hours after level has exfiltrated to below surface of existing grade. In all cases test runs to start only after the first 2" have ex -filtrated. e) Run tests for at least 30 minutes and record as a minimum -- date, weather, project name, test run by, test number, location on site, sketch of hole and casing, ground water conditions, incremental drop and time, and subsurface soil information. Information shall be tabulated and attested to by a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Florida. The County Planning Department must be notified at least 24 hours in advance of the tests being conducted and reserves the right to witness the test procedure. Exfiltration rates for designing the site drainage facilities shall be determined by the developer's designer from these tests. Alternate percolation tests procedure may be used if approved in writing by the Planning Department prior to their use. 3. In order to determine the limits required of the disposal facilities, the Planning Department will make a judgment, with the aid of competent engineering advice, based on the data submitted by the applicant with the drainage plan: The data shall at least consist of hydrographs for*each of the above storm criteria and disposal curves (actual and required) based upon current suitable site percolation tests as described in 2. through 2e. The Planning Department will make recommendations to the County Planning and Zoning Board for their consideration in formulating their decision. L. ADDTIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AFFECTED DEVELOPMENT: 1. It may be necessary for some projects to seek permits from governmental agencies other than the County. In such cases, zoning and building permits will not be issued for -8- EOOK 1 PAGE h F - SEP 51979 aoox 41 PAvr 490 - these projects until the applicant submits proof of approval or certification from those agencies involved to the Plan- ning Department when applicable to the project. Agencies from which permits may be required include, but are not limited to, the following.: a) Department of Environmental Regulation. b) Department of Transportation. c) Corps of Engineers. d) St. John's River Water Management District. e) Florida Health & Rehabilition Services. f) Indian River Farms Drainage District. g) St. John's Drainage District. h) Sebastian River Drainage District. i) .Fellsmere Water Management District. 2. A site plan which shows lands to be dedicated for road right-of-way will be issued a zoning permit only after the deed(s) for the right-of-way have been recorded as part of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. M. Should any section, clause, word or provision of this Ordinance, or application of a provision contained within this Ordinance, be declared by the County to be unconstitutional or invalid, such declaration shall not affect the validty of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part or application declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. N. This Ordinance shall be effective this 5th day of September , 1979. STATE OF FLORIDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. FREDA WRIGHT, CLERK 6Y p� D.C. DATE I ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING TO THE AGENDA AN ITEM REGARDING A CONSULTANT ASSISTING THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR A SHORT TERM IN A PROJECT CONCERNING WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE AND SOLID WASTE. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE FOLLOWING PROPOSAL: PROPOSAL FOR SERVICES INDIAN RIVER COUNTY rRoJi:CT: Develop a Basic Framework for Community Facilities Planning wUHTIVE: To prepare a policy plan that will meet basic state re- quirements for a "Water, Sewer, Drainage and Solid Waste" element under the LGCPA. This policy plan will establish the framework for more detailed planning in the future. IORK PROGRAM: Task 1; Development Factors Analysis. This task will pro- vide an overview of the most significant physical and other key factors affecting county development. The analysis will be based on available published information from local, regional and state sources -- especially prior county . planning efforts and the present 11201" Plan. Factors to be analyzed will include: SEP 51979 a) existing land use b) traffic circulation c) major development projects d) environmental conditions e) community facilities f) development regulations g) historical development trends This information will be summarized on a series of -annotated maps, and a composite analysis of development problems and opportunities will be prepared in graphic and brief narrative form. Task 2; Development Potential Analysis. The purpose of this task is to analyze the overall county development pattern in terms of physical conditions, economic influences and accepted urban planning criteria. Factors a) -g) of Task 1 will provide the information base for this analysis, leading to a general but realistic characterization of existing developmental conditions in the county. After preliminary delineation of land use districts in the county, the following will be undertaken: a) assessment of development potential of each district b) identification of community facilities implications in each district. Task 3; Community Facilities Policy Plan. Utilizing data assembled in Task 1, especially that from.the 11201" Plan, a generalized spatial concept for meeting the county's water, sewer, drainage and solid waste needs will be prepared. 45 BOOK 41 PAPF491 F_ DOCUMENTS: FEE AND CO,%iPENSATION: BooK 1 PAGE49Z However, the predominant emphasis will be placed on preparing a workable system of policies, performance criteria and implementation strategies that can be applied by local decisionmakers on a regular basis. In addition, recommenda- tions for specific actions will be made. This policy system will conform with that for future land use and other appropriate plan elements. All typing of reports and preparation of final graphics will be the responsibility of Indian River County. This will be a time -and -expenses contract, with total hourly charges not to exceed four thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500.00). The hourly charges for RMBR personnel will be: a) Benjamin Withers, AICP $45./hour b) Michael Patterson $35./hour c) Alvin Vance(technician) $17.50/hour keimbursable expenses will be charged as follows: a) mileage @ $0.17 per mile b) food and lodging @ invoice price c) telephone & postage @ invoice price d) blueprints @ invoice price e) Xerox @ $0.15 per copy -If the project should extend beyond thirty days in duration, monthly statements of time and expenses will be sent to the County for payment. EXTRA SERVICES: The services enumerated in this proposal include one final -presentation to County officials. The following are to be considered extra services which will be performed only after specific authorization by the County: ' a) additional presentations to County officials b) special presentations to TCRPC officials C) all formal public hearings ` d) typing and preparation of final graphics PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER EXPLAINED THAT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT MUST BE COMPLETED BY OCTOBER IST AND SHOULD NOT EXCEED $4,500; THERE ARE FUNDS IN THIS YEARS BUDGET TO COVER THIS EXPENSE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PROPOSAL, THE CON- SULTANT FEE NOT TO EXCEED $4,500, AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE NECESSARY CONTRACT. 11016 THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE ABANDONMENT OF BOWLINE DRIVE BETWEEN REGATTA AND MOORINGLINE DRIVE IN THE MOORINGS, ATTORNEY DOROTHY HUDSON PRESENTED THE PROPERLY ADVERTISED NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPLY FOR ABANDONMENT, AND TAX RECEIPTS AS FOLLOWS: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vera Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a , in the matter of tvZ - o 0 n .h � f � \ifwd e lished in said newspaper in the issues of rx A < < r Court, was pub- Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County,', Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy ofl adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this!adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this "day of A.D. - (Bu iness Manager) e (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indi River County, Florida) (SEAL) SEP 51979 47 NOTICE OF INTENTTOAPPLY TO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FOR VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF THE MOORINGS SUBDIVISION Notice is hereby given .that THE i MOORINGS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, as owners of the property, by and through the undersigned attorney, intend to make application to the Indian River County Commission for a vacation and abandonment of a portion of the Plat of The Moorings Subdivision, Unit 11 which plat was. filed in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, on July 24, 1978, and recorded 'in Platbook 8, page 28, to the extent that the Plat of The Moorings Subdivision, Unit 11, affects the following property: That portion of Bowline Drive running between Regatta Drive to the. North, and Moorlingline Drive to the South, bounded by Parcel A to the West, and Lot 58 to the East. By: -s-Dorothy A. Hudson P.O. Box 3160 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 ry (305) 567-5131 Aug. 22, 29, 1979. Boor 4i FdcF49 SEP 51979 •- 4!..9's11 �.1IA a►�► f T :r1Eci ?r C Y �lrl'E ' ► ' _ AXLE LEVIt U BOOK 41 PAUF 494 I X t!(,' E I'"IPa _[�; L�;E"f�_CtltttJ_�'•''�,_t�j I �'� f-:E:FIL E:,"f'f't'f f�. F L:I' ` :1.:: I� T.If IE?:.�1.� , tIE•; l L .}:'►_If'L T GFl f L _ ���.�. _ 4v_Irt` __.___._. I.11�►I�E� �':HE.r_:T�:�=:—LT_i'71 IE�t._t=' -f.� 7 r:11+301_ 8,15.1.2 Gt`aaE= E'. t't+:If:':F.1I ; ASSESSED VALMS :10U111',' 484.83 TA'! COLLE: CT►: Ru► A-" JET' T ,7t=i t ���� : a� + z 'f',' f'. r:+. E:rlr. a. ��►i_e ir, „+ t., fFiXVf—'1L 101. 4540 1'HER x'.03. 52 VE_F;O BEACH, FLA. � '£+Ei� w:' i • ACREAGE .04 � TOTAL :i �_'.'. 47 27 :3 40 0006 0000 I;,i►�► 00t/1 ,.,.'rw- mof,'tf:: I t1G ` •`.:"uE r..'^ `F`C I...._..�N ru VI MOORINGS DEVELOPMENT PENT CO • f 0 B0� <1F_.%► ] CsEf-'I+--:H `:T f .....: r;,, • i > + s VERO BEACH FL 32960 t• :.x w (PLEASE TURN OVER) THIS TAX NOTICE BECOMES A RECEIPT WHEN VALIDATED BY TAX COLLECTOR 14 ri, TEJ'�li+'Cr7t{[_Zfit:1'�E t i i._. 1� NOVr— 4X E�t_r_; —�:: rJ--�':: F t._L' --1 i'iFI I if-�f : I L. '�:: 'ut�L I C:r t'f E X TYC &'ipia?TAXES LEVIED tU=11:f f.::HE. f= Fi t t lEa C ►:1: 7 :Ctfr_'►fiL 1169. 79 GENE E. I.10U::. m :OuNl y 67� . 11 TA:� f::►:►LLE f:TOR I to rX /�SSEU y!1 I U[S N rrt Tt•�`� �h1`��iit,-.�:?t� I F'�' P. O. B0 •: 9 �109 Fi VAL 140. 4Bri )THE[--:'. 281. 72 VERO BEACH, FLA. .2960 • Uni t, I ACREAGE GTAL 2122.62 27 -33 110 01:1 6,I t+�(�f i t��iri ,�!t t cn r 'I sx7C10F;It2+ ,`"°=r�C;`^I�tIIT 2 PBI u' 12B LOT 58ru w MOORINGS DEVELOF-MENT CO "m PO BOX 3160 BEACH BTFi r I,v,+:-1 J.... '.r.' I ' .. -gym VEF';Ci BEACH FL 32960 , %n . n N n ,•J , . rlt,: ")'.i 'i 't''i:. fti'1.. +�. •: (PLEASE TURN OVER) THIS TAX NOTICE BECOMES A RECEIPT WHEN VALIDATED BY TAX COLLECTOR ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 79-77 FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF BOWLINE DRIVE BETWEEN REGATTA AND MOORINGLINE DRIVE IN THE MOORINGS, E08 RESOLUTION NO. 79-77 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida resolve: 1. That a petition has been filed by THE MOORINGS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, as owners of the property, with this Board requesting this Board to vacate and abandon a portion of the Plat of The Moorings Subdivision, Unit II, which Plat was recorded in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, at Plat Book 8, Page 28 on July 24, 1978, and to renounce and disclaim any interest of the County and the Public said street, road and/or highway herein described as: That portion of Bowline Drive running between Regatta Drive to the North, and Mooringline Drive to the South, bounded by Parcel A to the West, and Lot 58 to the East. 2. That at a hearing held on August 8, 1979, this Board determined that the Petitioners had complied with Florida Statute Chapter 177, in that the persons making application for said vacation and abandonment are the owners in fee simple to the above described property and that the vacation and aban- donment of that portion of said Plat will not affect the ownership or right of convenient access of persons owning other parcels located within the bound- aries of The Moorings Subdivision. This Board has further determined that the above described property Is not located within the limits of any incorporated municipality. 3. Pursuant to Florida Statute 177 the Petitioners have published legal notice twice weekly in a newspaper of general circulation in Indian River County prior to this hearing before the Board. Proof of said Publication together with certificates showing that all County and State taxes have been paid, are being attached to the Petition and appearing In the minutes of this meeting. SEP BOOK 4� PAGE 495,E SEP 41 FA, 11E 496 '' , 4. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County does herewith vacate and abandon that portion of the Plat of The Moorings Subdivision, described as follows: That portion of Bowline Drive running between Regatta Drive to the North, and Mooringline Drive to the South, bounded by Parcel A to the West, and Lot 58 to the East. and does further denounce and disclaim all interest in the above described street, road and/or highway. 5. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be filed in the offices of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, and duly recorded in the Public Records. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By 24/A(1W C )VadA , William C. Wodtke, Jr. C ha irma n A t to s Freda Wright Clerk Adopted: September 5, 1979 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING TO THE AGENDA AN EMERGENCY ITEM REGARDING DEBRIS REMOVAL AS REQUESTED BY ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ADVISED THE BOARD THAT THE CITY HAS MADE THE OFFER TO PICK UP, FREE OF CHARGE, ALL DEBRIS THAT WAS CAUSED BY THE HURRICANE; BUT THE COUNTY IS RESTRICTED, AS WE ARE NOT IN THE GARBAGE COLLECTION BUSINESS. HE RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNTY EXTEND THE HOURS FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 9:00 P.M. AT THE LANDFILL FOR TWO WEEKS; CHARGE NOTHING FOR PEOPLE BRINGING IN DEBRIS; REDUCE THE CHARGE FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES; AND STAGE ALL DEBRIS FOR USE BY THE AIR CURTAIN DESTRUCTOR. CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE TO CHARGE $9 A TON FOR ANYTHING TAKEN TO THE LANDFILL; WE CANNOT ESTABLISH A DIFFERENT RATE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING DESIGNATING DIFFERENT AREAS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY FOR THE DEBRIS, AND THE FACT THAT EACH SITE MUST BE CONTROLLED; OTHERWISE, GARBAGE WOULD BE INCLUDED IN WITH THE DEBRIS. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT HE IS LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF MAKING A CLAIM TO THE STATE FOR REIMBURSE- MENT FOR DEBRIS REMOVAL. HE FURTHER STATED THAT THE DIVISION OF FORESTRY COULD DESIGNATE THE AREAS WHERE WE COULD BURN THIS MATERIAL. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS READ ALOUD A SECTION OF THE'BOND COVENANTS REGARDING THE ABOVE DISCUSSION. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, TO AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATORS OFFICE TO TAKE WHATEVER STEPS ARE NECESSARY WITHIN TWO WEEKS TO GET RID OF THE DEBRIS OTHER THAN GOING THROUGH THE LANDFILL. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS FELT THE BURNING SHOULD BE DONE BY THE FORESTRY SERVICE OR UNDER THE FIRE DEPARTMENT'S SUPERVISION. . THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. SEP 51979 51 BOOK 41 FACE 49'7 SEP 51979 BOOK 41 pa°`498 ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISCUSSED THE CULVERT AT 90TH AVENUE AND CITRUS ROAD WITH THE BOARD. HE CONTINUED THAT THIS CULVERT IS NOT SAFE - WHAT IS NEEDED IS A VERY LONG CULVERT PIPE WHICH WOULD COST FROM $10,000 TO $12,000, AND WHICH WOULD REQUIRE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING. ASSISTANT ADMINIS- TRATOR NELSON RECOMMENDED THAT WE OBTAIN'THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING EXPERTISE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, AND COORDINATE IT WITH THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, TO LAY THE PIPE BEFORE THE FRUIT SEASON GETS INTO OPERATION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDA- TION OF THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR AND PROCEED WITH THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROJECT. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISCUSSED A RESOLUTION FROM THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN TO THE DOT FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON STATE ROAD 512 AT THE INTERSECTION OF STATE ROAD 5 (U.S. #1). COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY DOES NOT MAINTAIN TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON STATE ROADS WITHIN MUNICIPALITIES. SHE SUGGESTED THAT SINCE THE POLICY CANNOT BE CHANGED TODAY, THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN SHOULD CONTACT THE DOT FOR A SURVEY AND A TRAFFIC STUDY. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD DRAFT A LETTER TO MAYOR FLOOD IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN REGARDING, THIS MATTER. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED TO THE BOARD THAT 90% OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS IN THE COUNTY HAVE BEEN DAMAGED BY THE HURRICANE, AND SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION CO. HAS BEEN NOTIFIED OF THIS FACT. HE STATED THAT FOUR-WAY STOP SIGNS ARE BEING PLACED WHERE THERE ARE MALFUNCTIONING TRAFFIC SIGNALS. COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH HAD BROUGHT IN REINFORCEMENTS FROM OTHER CITIES NOT HIT BY THE HURRICANE TO HELP WITH RESTORATION OF ELECTRIC POWER, AND ASKED IF SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION CO. HAD ANY SUCH REINFORCEMENTS. THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR WAS UNCERTAIN ABOUT WHETHER THEY DID OR NOT. ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT THE NUMBER ONE PRIORITY SHOULD BE THE PLACEMENT OF FOUR-WAY STOP SIGNS. HE SUGGESTED PAINTING IN YELLOW THE WORD "STOP" ON THE STREETS, IF NECESSARY. CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT IN THEIR PRESENTATION, SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION CO. STATED THEY WOULD PROVIDE BARRICADES AND OTHER FACILITIES TO THE COUNTY, IF NEEDED. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INTERJECTED THAT HE WOULD CHECK BACK WITH SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION CO. COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT THERE ARE PEOPLE TAKING THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND STOP SIGNS, AND SUGGESTED THAT AN ANNOUNCE- MENT BE MADE ON THE RADIO CONCERNING THIS MATTER. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE PERSONALLY KNEW THAT THE ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT AND OTHER STAFF MEMBERS PERFORMED OVER AND BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY DURING THE HURRICANE, AND MANY ORGANIZATIONS DID AN OUTSTANDING JOB. HE FELT THAT THE COUNTY CREWS DESERVE A GREAT DEAL OF CREDIT FOR THEIR WORK IN TREE REMOVAL AND CORRECTING DRAINAGE PROBLEMS. COMMISSIONER.SIEBERT STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A LETTER OF APPRECIATION TO THE ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT INCLUDED IN THEIR NEXT PAY CHECK'THANKING THEM FOR THE WORK PERFORMED. HE CONTINUED THAT VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS, SUCH AS CIVIL DEFENSE, RED CROSS, VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUADS, SCHOOL BOARD, THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, ETC., WERE TO BE COMMENDED FOR WORKING TO- GETHER FOR A COMMON CAUSE. HE CONTINUED THAT HE IS CONCERNED THAT THE CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY MIGHT BE LULLED INTO A SENSE OF FALSE SECURITY AS A RESULT OF THIS HDRY 11 HURRICANE AND FELT THE MEMBERS OF THE PRESS SHOULD EMPHASIZE TO THE PUBLIC THAT WE WERE VERY FORTUNATE TO SURVIVE THIS HURRICANE, AS IT WAS NOT A TYPICAL ONE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 79-78 FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE; RESOLUTION N0. 79-79 FOR THE AMERICAN RED CROSS; RESOLUTION N0. 79-80 FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, INC., AND RESOLUTION N0. 79-81 FOR THE SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD COMMENDING THEIR -FINE WORK DURING HURRICANE DAVID. SEP 51979 53 BOOK 41 PACE99 SEP 51979 U-0-0-0- 0 0 0 @DOK Soo NO. 79 '--78 WHEREAS, Indian River County was hit by Hurricane David on eptember 3, 1979; and WHEREAS, Indian River County suffered.relatively minor damage, yaith no loss of life, due to the preparedness and immediate action of the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE; and WHEREAS, the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE, when Hurricane )David appeared on the scene, maintained a log of hurricane events •and activities; and WHEREAS, the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE had all equip- ment at alert readiness; and WHEREAS, the personnel of the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE as placed on stand-by status as soon as Indian River County was laced on a hurricane alert; and WHEREAS, as soon as it was determined that Hurricane David ould hit Indian River County, the Control and Support Groups ere contacted; and WHEREAS, the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE was responsible for the coordination of all emergency response departments such �'�as law enforcement, Red Cross, school officials, fire department, ambulance squads during the preparedness, response, and recovery phases of Hurricane David; and WHEREAS, the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE served as public information officer to keep the public informed during the crisis; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the Board on behalf of itself and the citizens of Indian river County, congragulates the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE for its prompt response to the crisis spawned by Hurricane David; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board expresses its deep appreciaLiun to the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CIVIL DEFENSE and all of its personnel for its exemplary service to the citizens of Indian River County during the crisis of Hurricane David. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 5th day of eptember , 1979. M �'' 'r{ ' �• �� ` � � .ILMI f Chairman, County Commissio . OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, Indian River County was hit by Hurricane David on September 3, 1979; and WHEREAS, the AMERICAN RED CROSS of Indian River County per- formed many varied and important duties which helped prevent any loss of life and kept injuries to a minimum during the crisis of Hurricane David, among them being: Activating and manning Red Cross shelters when requested by the Civil Defense Department; Providing food and first-aid kits as necessitated; Providing warning and evacuation assistance; Preparing designated shelters for physically incapacitated; Preparedness to assist individuals in need as a result ^f hurricane damage; Assisting in communication NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM- MISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the Board on behalf of itself and the citizens of Indian River County, con- gratulates the AMERICAN RED CROSS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY for a job well done; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the Board expresses its deep appreciation to the AMERICAN RED CROSS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY for its exemplary service during the crisis of Hurricane David and the Board expresses its thanks to all of the personnel of the AMERICAN RED CROSS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY for their performance during the time of crisis spawned by Hurricane David. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 5th day of September 1979. H 3 Chairman, County Commissioners SEP 51979 BOOK 41 PAGE rl- SEP 51979 BOOK 41 PAGE 502 `4 777- row 7H' September 3, 1979; and WHEREAS, during the crisis of Hurricane David the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, INC. helped to keep injuries at a minimum; and WHEREAS, the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, INC. provided medical and ambulance services as requested during the preparedness, response and recovery phases of Hurricane David; and - WHEREAS, the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, INC., together with the SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, effected 24 emergency calls during the main part of the storm without any accidents or injury; and WHEREAS, the response to a request to the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, INC. for ambulance service was most prompt and such promptness contributed greatly in eliminating any panic response that can occur in a disaster situation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM- MISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the Board on behalf of itself- and the citizens of Indian River County, expresses its deep appreciation to the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD for the exemplary service performed by the volunteers of the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, INC. during the time of crisis of Hurricane David. Said Resolution to become effective as of the 5th day of September , 1979. H ------------------- Chairman,County Commissioners u u u u J; ? 4 k [.3 t OF OF INDIAN Y RIVER WHEREAS, Indian River County was hit by Hurricane David on September 3, 1979; WHEREAS, during the crisis of Hurricane David the SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD helped to keep injuries at a minimum; and WIIEREAS, the SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD provided medical and ambulance services as requested during the pre- paredness, response and recovery phases of hurricane David; and WHEREAS, the SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD, together with the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER A="ULANCE SQUAD, INC., effected 24 emergency calls during the main part of the storm without any accidents or injury; and WHEREAS, the response to a request to the SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD for ambulance service was most prompt and such promptness contributed greatly in eliminating any panic response that can occur in a disaster situation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the Board on behalf of itself and the citizens of Indian River County, expresses its deep appreciation to the SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD for the exemplary service performed by the volunteers of the SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD during the time of crisis of Hurricane David. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the September umirtnan,Lounty commi %�a SEP 51979 Boas 41 PAGE 504 THE HOUR OF 11:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK. READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT: VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in �In�dian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being . _ 2&�- - in the matter of in the lished in said newspaper in the issues of Court, was pub - Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this ay day of A.D. In— sines Manager) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, In 'a River County, Florida) (SEAL) SECTION A AMENDED ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY ADVERTISED NOTICE TO ACCEPT BIDS UNTIL AUGUST 22, 1979. THE NEW DATE FOR RECEIVING BIDS IS SEPTEMBER 5, 1979. - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA County Courthouse 2145 14th Avenue, Room 115 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Separate sealed BIDS for the construction Of: PHASE II, GIFFORD AREA SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RE -INSTALLING AND PLACING . INTO OPERATION AN EXISTING TREATMENT PLANT AND NEW DISPOSAL: FACILITIES, NEW PUMP STATION, NEW FORCEMAIN, AND RENOVATION EXISTING COLLECTION SYSTEM. will be received by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; FLORIDA, at the office of COUNTY AD- MINISTRATOR, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 2145 14th AVENUE, ROOM 115, until 11:30 A.M., (Daylight Saving Time) SEPTEMBER 5, 1979, and then at said office publicly opened and read aloud. The CONTRACT DOCUMENTS may be examined at the following locations: 1. Office of the Engineers, Sverdrup .& Parcel and Associates, Inc., 2002 N.W. 13th Street, Suite 201, Gainesville, Florida 32601. 2. Indian River County Courthouse, County Administrator Office, 2145 14th Avenue, Room 115, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. 3. Beindorf and Associates, Inc., 3885 20th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. Copies of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS may be obtained at the office of Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc., located at 2002 N.W. 13th Street, Suite 201, Gainesville, Florida, 32601 upon payment of 850.00 for each set. NO REFUNDS will be made for She return of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Dated: August 10, 1979. s -Jack G. Jennings County Administrator Aug. 15, 22, 1979. THE CHAIRMAN THEN ASKED FOR RECEIPT OF THE BIDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTICE AND THE FOLLOWING SEALED BIDS WERE RECEIVED, OPENED AND READ: DRIVEWAY, INC, $265,345,25 CHAPMAN CONSTRUCTION, INC, $304,002,75 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM— MISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE BIDS BEING REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR EVALUATION. 58 A COPY OF RESOLUTION No. 79-71 HONORING KATHERYN S, BEINDORF FOR SERVING ON THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF AUGUST 8, 1979, SEP 51979 59 b®oK 41 PAGE 01505 SEP 51979 - - - - - - - - - na 1 FAGF 506 r WHEREAS, KATHERYN S. BEINDORF, was appointed to the Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission on November 1, 1978; and -WHEREAS, during her tenure on the Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission KATHERYN S. BEINDORF served the citizens of Indian River County with diligence; and WHEREAS, KATHERYN S. BEINDORF, has tendered her resignation from the Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission to be effective as of August 8, 1979; NOW., THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BX THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board, on behalf of itself and the citizenry of Indian River County, expresses its deep appreciation to KATHERYN S. BEINDORF for a job well done; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board wishes KATHERYN S. BEINDORF great success in whatever future endeavors she may choose. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 8th day of August, 1979. d Mpt", Chairman,County Commissioners COMMISSIONER SOY BROUGHT UP THE SUBJECT OF SELECTING AN AUDITING FIRM TO PREPARE THE COUNTY AUDITS, AND REPORTED THAT SHE AND FINANCE OFFICER BARTON CAME UP WITH THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS: O'HAIRE, PETERKIN & MORAN - SERO BEACH, FLA. W. 0. DALEY - ORLANDO, FLA. DISCUSSION ENSUED REGARDING THE FEES AND HOW THE COUNTY WOULD BE BILLED; ALSO WHO WOULD BE DOING THE ACTUAL WORK. THE BOARD REQUESTED THE FINANCE OFFICER AND COMMIS- SIONER SOY TO SPEAK TO BOTH AUDITING FIRMS IN ORDER TO MAKE THEIR FINAL SELECTION. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON ADVISED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD MADE PROVISIONS FOR THE PROSPECTIVE AUDITOR BY SETTING, UP THE CONFERENCE ROOM IN THE OFFICE SO THAT THEY WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THE COMPUTER RUNS, ETC., AND THERE IS AMPLE SPACE TO ACCOMMODATE THEM. THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND NOS. 62973 - 63065 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 12:04 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: CLERK SEP 51979 61 CHAIRMAN vj BOOK 41 PAGE 5Q f WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1979 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN SPECIAL SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1979, AT 5:01 O'CLOCK P.M. PRESENT WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, .JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT, .JR.; R. DON DEESON; AND PATRICK B. LYONS. ALSO PRESENT WERE NEIL NELSON, ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMIN- ISTRATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, SJR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; .JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; AND JANICE W. CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERK, THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AN EMERGENCY ITEM TO BE PRESENTED BY ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED THAT A GREAT DEAL OF CONFUSION HAD ARISEN AS TO WHETHER SEPTEMBER 4TH WOULD BE CONSIDERED A WORK DAY. THE COURTHOUSE WAS CLOSED SEPTEMBER 3RD FOR THE LABOR DAY HOLIDAY, BUT DUE TO HURRICANE DAVID, THE RADIO STATED THE COURTS WOULD BE CLOSED ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4TH. AS A RESULT, MANY THOUGHT THE COURTHOUSE WAS CLOSED, AND CIRCUMSTANCES LED PEOPLE TO BELIEVE IT WAS NOT A WORK DAY. MR. NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT 37 PEOPLE IN THE ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT DID COME TO WORK THE DAY AFTER THE HURRICANE. HE RECOMMENDED THAT SEPTEMBER 4TH BE DECLARED A HURRICANE DAY AND FELT THAT THE PEOPLE WHO DID SHOW UP FOR WORK ON SEPTEMBER 4TH SHOULD BE PAID ADDITIONALLY FOR THE HOURS WORKED. HE FURTHER SUGGESTED THAT CRITERIA BE ESTABLISHED FOR SUCH EMERGENCY SITUATIONS. COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY ADMIN- ISTRATOR HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO CHECK WITH VARIOUS DEPARTMENT HEADS AND MAKE THE ANNOUNCEMENT AS TO WHETHER OR NOT IT WILL BE A WORK DAY; AND HE FELT ONE ANNOUNCEMENT OUGHT TO BE MADE FOR THE COUNTY. SEP 121979 B©u 41 Pnu 508 SEP 121979 MOK 41 PAGF.50 COMMISSIONER DEESON SUGGESTED GIVING THE EMPLOYEES A DAY OFF FOR THE DAY THAT THEY DID WORK. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON COMMENTED THAT IT DOESN'T INVOLVE THAT MANY PEOPLE AND RECOMMENDED THAT WE PAY THEM FOR THE REGULAR DAY PLUS THE HOURS THAT THEY DID WORK ON SEPTEMBER 4TH. COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED THAT WE MUST NOTIFY THE PUBLIC IF THE COURTHOUSE WILL BE OPEN OR NOT WHEN AN EMERGENCY IS DECLARED; AND PEOPLE WHO MADE THE EFFORT AND CAME TO WORK SHOULD BE COMPENSATED. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ALSO FELT THAT THE EMPLOYEES THAT DID SACRIFICE THEIR TIME SHOULD BE PAID FOR SHOWING UP FOR WORK. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE ASSISTANT ADMIN- ISTRATOR IS RECOMMENDATION. COMMISSIONER LYONS POINTED OUT THAT CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR NUZIE REQUESTED THE PUBLIC TO STAY AT HOME UNLESS IT WAS AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT SOME PEOPLE WERE NOT AT HOME AS THEY HAD TO EVACUATE. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS CARRIED L lilhlll i�wm THE HOUR OF 5:01 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: 1 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that the Following Is a statement , COUNTY OF lt!DIAN RIPER: BUDGET YEAR 197980 STATE OF FLORIDA summa rizing a budget tentatively adopted by the Board of P. VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL t'.: County Gemmlss:6nerf of Indian River C6unty, Florida, showing Li } Federal Sources - g' receipts of Bald Board for the fiscal year 1979-80 budgeted by , t '� •,. '6,71 Local Sources BOND said Board for said fiscal year and showing the proposed F Published Weekl Y `� .. <>. t' expenditures by said Board for said fiscal year ending September ENTERPRISE Net { w 30, 1980 In ords a(rd figures as fol lows: q,•_---' ; Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida TOTAL S Appropriations: ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .j INOIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA COUNTY OF lt!DIAN RIPER: BUDGET YEAR 197980 STATE OF FLORIDA LAURELWO D B.t •rr P un 1 -.Gro ,i nurh, l pi nilly appcared J. J. Schumann, Jr, who on oath TOTAL _, l•e s [ . - P f,nop; •r f N t - I, --h Pre:; -Journal, a weekly newspaper published Esti Receipts B Balances: l:. , [..., h , , L, .,n f... rr ,•ntv, i I .� ,; th.rt :h.• attached coo of advertisement, bmn -• y Federal Sources - g' State Sources STREET Local Sources BOND Valorem Taxes (See Note A) F Subtal-" ot SHARING Less: 52 per. F.S. 129.01(2) (b),•' ENTERPRISE Net _in the matter of Cash Balance Forward 10-1-79 ISSUE Tdtal.Edttmated Receipts S Balances TOTAL S Appropriations: ' in rhe -. Court, was pub- Legislative b Administrative �_�( Taxation Judicial p Ir.t., l n -a �! r.• :. .r, p „>;u�; of -11.1 �.1Jt��-?T-`' J 9 7� 1 E,acil cna Service Dept. Building Operation 6 Halntenance Planning 6 Development; - _ Veterans Services r Police Protection P,i,: v,t f,:.•1 •.: .. !ha' t' c ',"'I Vern C;each Press-Journat is a newspaper published at Fire Control Correction (County Jail) ' [•. ,•`� , It,.••r C,unty, anJ Chit the said newspaper has heretofore �, t•: n • : :. r�,�1 .hr I m ..� d Ir!ban R.r, cr Cu,,,nry, Florida, weekly and has been entered i Sul Id ing s 2oning I d �-.� ,•n : m rtr:r at t',c r oFher: in V-, Cca;h, m ;aid Indian River County, Florida other Protective Road Construction 6 Maintenance 1 •• a i••,•1 r .• •• ;•.,• n •.r p„., ,,, !, r �,; Ihr• f,.;f - pu:Arahon of the attached copy of adver- -t, ,,.,1 Oh.-! i,,,o tl.,t hr ha; -cher paid nor promised any person, firm or Refuse Olsposal j � c p• , an; �.� u.r, r ranmr..i- n or refund f it the purpose of securing this adver- Health Services • h ,..,.t fa r nub:,c ali :n �n the f r+.w p,if,er - Yater , Sewer ,/yQ�'/��,� /q Welfare Services Recreation Facilities •N ,n r.. ,..I ,,, .,hn1 I,f •n fh; D de�Cy _. A.D. 7� Culture / ^ Natural Resources S Operating Expanses - rte/ .... Debt Servlca.,--..- Total Appropriations �j (Business Manager) Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward ' 444"' Total Budget (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Cc6t, Indian River County, Florida) NOTE A -General Fund and 1959 16 S Bond -wldel taxesssue to to bere e only county assessed. Sept. S, 7, 9,1979.E _ • .. GENERAL R - 50 CTY NO CTY SO CTY R KRIDGE LAURELWO D 1959 1 i S TOTAL _, ER . FUND PORTAT ION SERVICE REVENUE HASTE WATER WATER WATER STREET STREET BOND FU NOS F - FUND FUND SHARING ENTERPRISE ENTERPRISE ENTERPRISE TAXING LIGHTING LIGHTING ISSUE TOTAL 1 DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT I S 7,000 $ $ $ 450,709 $ S $ S S $ "- S 457 7 0p $1,618 124,981 1,337,639 155.569 - ,18 9 1z 559,900 50,500 660,800 75,000 573.936 216,117 254,891 1,200 90 40 5.000 2,397,474 18.00 4,510.7 407.759 2.278 1.280 48.693 4.970 7.33 5,202,624 1,3 ,139 1,224,128 525.709 573,936 216,117 254,891 1,200 2,365 1,320 53.698 9,444,1125 70.92 ( 260 131) 69,407) ( 61,207) n8 66 ( 2 685 393 614 ( 2.96) 4,942,'493. 1,310.732 1,1 2,9 I 525,709 3,93 216,117 254,891 1,200 2,250 1,25 51,00 9,0 0,511 7.9 852 805 415 000 1 030 034 15 000 540 886 57 148 4 265 708 32.04 g1:31,4!3981 37$ 2,171 537$1,577,921 1,555,7 3 73 93 216,117 25 91 t 200 2 790 z t 0 to 1 13 1 219 100.00 t $ 881,141 $ $ I $ 20,608 $ $ 5 S $ S $ $ 901,749 6.77 813,067 813,067 6.11 559,238 26,604 585,842 4.40 106,700 ( 106,700 .80 46,488 46,488 .35 211,893 227,850439,743 3.30 197,963 206,238 404,2p1 3.04 27.464 300 27,764 ,21 2,190,955 52,135 2,243,090 16.84 450,758 450,758 3.39 3,000 12,600 .09 243,133 1,785 244,918 1.84 55.685 1.025 56,710 -43 1,834,945 405,420 2,240,365 16.82 220,576 12,000 232.576 1.75 288,528 288,528 2.17 46,057 216,117 254,891 517,065 3.88 169,937169,937 1.28 219.333 148,422 ': 156,080 .` 523.835 3.93 89.500 89.500 .67 45.978 7.550 53.528 .40 375.386 2,590 1.990 125 380,091 2.85 249,502 1 179.695 1 54 031 483 228 ,63 1.30 ,909 S 1,376,697 $ 555,0 1 21 ,117 Z54. 9l 2,590 1,990 54.156 1 12,2 3 95 573,489 194,692 110,000 150,000 19,855 16,200 200 150 1,063,586 -7.99 554 92 141 900 161 012 29 046 25 91 1 200 2.79 2,140 54,000 104,156 940,3501 1 31 2 .06 100.00 2 I Ij-PAL1 5 5 7 571,93621 117 A detailed copy of the proposed budget is on file in the office of the Clerk of Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida. The said Board will meet In the County Commissioner's Room, Indian River .County Courthouse, Vera Beach, Florida at 5:01 P.M. o'clock an Wednesday, September 12, 1979, for the purpose of hearing requests and .complaints from the public regarding said proposed budget. Byt. -s William C. Wodtke, Jr.. ChaI rman Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, Florida 5 E P 121979 moo 41- Pm,,, F 511 CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING IS FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET, AS ADVERTISED. HE CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD WILL BEGIN WITH THE ITEMS -IN THE GENERAL FUND. ATTORNEY COLLINS RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD HAVE THE FINAL HEARING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET THE WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 24TH, AS WELL AS ADOPTION OF THE MILLAGES. COMMISSIONER LOY POINTED OUT VARIOUS PLACES WHERE CHANGES WERE MADE. SHE CONTINUED THAT IN THE GENERAL FUND ON PAGE 16 UNDER GENERAL HEALTH, THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT ALCO- HOPE. COMMISSIONER LOY PROPOSED THAT WE FUND ALCO-HOPE FOR $5,000 AND DECREASE OUR CONTRIBUTION TO THE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER BY THAT SAME AMOUNT - WHICH WOULD BE $61,090. SHE CONTINUED THAT THE DIRECTOR AT THE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER HAS BEEN CONSULTED AND HE FELT IT WAS A LEGITIMATE REQUEST ON OUR PART. COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT ON PAGE 3 UNDER MUNICIPAL SERVICES FUND THERE WAS A QUESTION ON THE PROFESSIONAL OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON EXPLAINED THAT THE OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES ARE DUE IN SEPTEMBER AND THE COUNTY DOES NOT RECEIVE THAT MONEY UNTIL THE FIRST OF OCTOBER; THEREFORE, $19,000 MORE WAS PUT IN THE REVENUE. COMMISSIONER LOY BROUGHT UP ITEM 85.21 AND 58.22 WHERE WE HAD AGREED TO FUND THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AT THE EXACT SAME LEVEL AS WE DID LAST YEAR; AND THIS BUDGET SHOWS THAT WE SHOULD HOLD SEBASTIAN TO $330. COMMISSIONER LOY CONTINUED THAT ALL SALARIES ARE HOLDING TO THE 5.5% INCREASES, AND UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION HAS BEEN REMOVED. SHE CONTINUED THAT THE REASON IS THAT WE WOULD FUND EACH CLAIM AS IT CAME ALONG; THEREFORE, THERE ARE ZERO TOTALS. COMMISSIONER LOY REFERRED TO PAGE 62, REVENUE SHARING, AND FINANCE OFFICER BARTON EXPLAINED THAT WE LOST EVERYTHING WE GAINED AS WE FORGOT TO PUT IN THE MATCH MONEY FOR THE NEW COMMUNICA- TION SYSTEM FOR THE VERO BEACH AMBULANCE SQUAD; THEREFORE, WE NEED TO ADD $19,500, AS OUR CASH MATCH FOR THE COMMUNICATION RRITI r" FINANCE OFFICER BARTON REFERRED TO UTILITIES - EQUIPMENT, AND STATED THERE WAS A PIECE OF EQUIPMENT THAT THE UTILITY DEPART- MENT WANTED TO PURCHASE AND THE COST WAS SPLIT IN THIRDS, AS TWO OF THE THREE ARE ENTERPRISES. HE -CONTINUED THAT WE DIVIDED THE COST IN TWO AND PUT IT IN THE OPERATION COST FOR THE ENTERPRISE FUNDS AND ELIMINATED IT FROM REVENUE SHARING. COMMISSIONER LOY REFERRED TO PAGE 37 OF THE GENERAL FUND FOR AN INCREASE IN THE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT BUDGET. SHE CONTINUED THAT THEY ADDED $48,800 - WHICH REPRESENTS ONE ADDITIONAL SHIFT, CONSISTING OF FOUR PEOPLE; AND ADDED $1,500 TO HANDLE UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT, $14,960 FOR TWO AUTOMOBILES; AND $4,740 FOR GAS, ETC., FOR A TOTAL INCREASE OF $70,000 IN THE SHERIFF'S BUDGET, PLUS THE COST OF WORKMEN�S COMPENSATION. COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED ON THE TRANSPORTATION FUND, AND STATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT LEVY ANY TAXES TO FUND THAT ENTIRE PROGRAM OF TRANSPORTATION. IT IS TO BE FUNDED BY OTHER SOURCES OF INCOME; THERE WILL BE NO DISTRIBUTION TO ANY OF THE MUNICI- PALITIES. SHE CONTINUED THAT ON PAGE 5, IT WILL SHOW WHAT THEY HAVE RECEIVED IN PREVIOUS YEARS. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT WAS A RECOMMENDATION FROM MR. KELTON AND STATED THAT THIS WAS AN APPROPRIATE TIME TO FOLLOW THIS RECOMMENDATION. SHE STATED THAT UNDER TIRES AND TUBES, THERE IS AN ADDED $10,000. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE INCOME ON THE ROAD & BRIDGE FUND FOR THE GAS TANK AND GAS TAX AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THOSE FIGURES WERE OBTAINED FROM THE STATE. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON DISCUSSED SEVERAL ITEMS THAT HAVE ARISEN CONCERNING .JUDGE SHARPS OFFICE AND THE OFFICE FOR JUDGE VOCELLE. HE CONTINUED THAT WE MUST FURNISH COMMUNICATION SERVICES AND ONE COPY MACHINE FOR THEIR USE. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR HAS BEEN MOVED FROM THE MODULAR BUILDING SO THAT JUDGE VOCELLE CAN MOVE IN, AND A NEW OFFICE CAN BE BUILT SEP 121979 5 BOOK 1 PAGE' FOR- THE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR IN THE WAREHOUSE, BUT HE WILL NEED AN AIR CONDITIONER, AND HE FELT THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED FOR LESS THAN $1,000, PLUS OBTAIN A COPY MACHINE FOR JUDGE SHARP AND .JUDGE VOCELLE. HE CONTINUED THAT A SMALL SAVIN COPY MACHINE WOULD COST $165 A MONTH. COMMISSIONER Loy SAID $1,000 COULD BE USED FOR THE COPY MACHINE AND $1,500 FOR EACH JUDGE FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE, AND $2,500 FOR CONTINGENCY. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED ABOUT THE REVISED BUDGET FOR PROPERTY APPRAISER LAW, AND FINANCE OFFICER BARTON COMMENTED THERE WAS NO BUDGET FOR HIM. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THEY WOULD DISCUSS THIS WITH MR. LAW THE NEXT DAY. CHAIRMAN WODTKE REFERRED TO PAGE 16 OF THE GENERAL FUND UNDER GENERAL HEALTH FOR THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT BUDGET OF $140,000. HE CONTINUED THAT DR. FLOOD STILL DOES NOT HAVE FINAL PROOF OF THE MONEY HE HAD LEFT SINCE 1974 DUE TO THE FAULT OF THE HRS COMPUTER; THE PRINT-OUT WAS INCORRECT. COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT -THE BOARD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RUNNING THE PROPER NOTICES FOR THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND THEY CHOSE TO PUT IT IN OUR BUDGET. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED THE FINANCE OFFICER IF THE LINE ITEM STILL WAS IN THE BUDGET FOR THE AUTOMOBILE FOR HIS DEPARTMENT. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON ANSWERED AFFIRMATIVELY, STATING THAT THE BOARD DIRECTED HIM TO LEAVE IT IN THE BUDGET AND WOULD DISCUSS IT AT A LATER DATE, BASED ON THE FACT THAT THERE WAS A POSSIBLE AVAILABILITY OF ANOTHER CAR IN THE COUNTY. HE CONTINUED THAT THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR WAS TO BE APPROACHED ABOUT THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CAR USED BY THE PERSONNEL DIRECTOR. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DONLON HAS BEEN DOING A GREAT DEAL OF RIGHT-OF-WAY WORK, AND PERMITTING WITH CABLEVISION AND TELEPHONE, AND CHECKING ON ROAD PROBLEMS. HE CONTINUED THAT THE CAR STAYS AT HIS HOME AT NIGHT AND THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT USES THE CAR DURING THE DAY. E71 COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT THE CAR SHOULD STAY IN THE BUDGET FOR THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND ALL OF THE COMMISSIONERS WERE IN AGREEMENT. CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT THE PRESS SHOULD ISSUE A STATEMENT THAT THIS PROPOSED BUDGET IS WHAT THE BOARD HAS ACCOMPLISHED IN ALL OF THEIR DELIBERATIONS, OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS, AND THIS BUDGET HAS BEEN FUNDED WITHOUT USING THE 5% INCREASE WHICH WAS ALLOWED UNDER THE NEW STATE STATUTES. HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS ACTUALLY BELOW THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WE REQUIRED LAST YEAR, AND FELT IT IS A CREDIT TO THE BOARD, THAT IT WILL RESULT IN A SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION IN OUR MILLAGE. LAST YEAR S MILLAGE WAS 4.72165 AND THIS YEAR IT IS 3.678, WHICH IS A 22% REDUCTION FOR THE GENERAL FUND. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT THIS EQUATES TO LAST YEAR'S ROAD & BRIDGE AND FINE & FORFEITURE FUNDS AND THAT PARTIC- ULAR MILLAGE IS ON A COUNTY -WIDE BASIS. HE CONTINUED THAT THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE FUND IS SET UP TO PROVIDE SERVICES FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS AND WE WILL BE ASSESSING A MILLAGE FOR FIRE SERVICE OF .67425, OR TWO-THIRDS OF A MILL. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED, AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:00 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: JLLL o Q G CLERK CHAIRMAN SEP 121979 7 BOOK �, F��,E 51 i WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1979 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1979, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.; R. DON DEESON; AND PATRICK B. LYONS. VICE CHAIRMAN ALMA LEE Loy WAS ABSENT. ALSO PRESENT WERE NEIL NELSON, ASSISTANT COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L. S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS- SIONERS; .JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; AND JANICE W. CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERK. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER. COMMISSIONER PATRICK B. LYONS LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLE- GIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND REV, JAMES RATCLIFF, CHRIST METHODIST -BY - THE SEA, GAVE THE INVOCATION. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORREC- TIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 8, 1979. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 8, 1979, AS WRITTEN. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON EXPLAINED THE VARIOUS BUDGET AMENDMENTS TO THE BOARD, AND REQUESTED THAT AN EMERGENCY ITEM BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA REGARDING A SPECIAL ACCOUNT FOR THE HOSPITAL BOND ISSUE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING TO THE AGENDA THE EMERGENCY ITEM REQUESTED BY THE FINANCE OFFICER. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON REQUESTED THAT A SPECIAL ACCOUNT BE OPENED FOR THE 1959 HOSPITAL BOND INTEREST AND SINKING FUND THAT THE COUNTY HAS ASSUMED WITH THE PURCHASE OF THE OLD HOSPITAL. HE CONTINUED THAT THIS ACCOUNT IS WITH BACHE & CO. FOR INVESTMENT PURPOSES, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE OPENING OF SEP 191979 BOOK 41 Pact- 515 SEP 191979 eooK 41-PA-Uc516 A SPECIAL ACCOUNT WITH BACHE & CO. FOR THE 1959 HOSPITAL BONDS WE HAVE ASSUMED, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN. ACCOUNT NUMBER FS-95034—_R.R.NO._ �_l�__ _....__— BRANCH _Roca Raton RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CASH ACCOUNT WITH BACHE & CO. INCORPORATED i, ..........TRI✓DA...WR1Gi�T...................................................................................., s ix .Cl.�rk..to-.The_Bnarfl_of........._........... C'c�u»t}�..Gommssion.. veril�ment *� Ct _ ........_............... a ; X 1 )I't� anized under the laws of ............441�'i... 71..atc......_.»»..»...._.... . of Florida her0w.certif that the following is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted County Commissi.one s h%. the hoard of h1ja;.= of said ell meeting duly called and held on the ..................._19.(11............................... .... day of S cp.topt le .....•.. 19...7) .. at which a quorum was present and that the said resolution has not been n1u(dificd of rescinded an(I is .till in full force and effect: RI':SOT.VED, that an account he opened by this corporation with BACHE & CO. INCORPORATED, (herein- after referre(i to as 11AC111•:), nlenlhers of the New York Stock Fxchange, and of other stock exchanges, to purchase, sell, and/or deal in mn and all stocks, honds, other securities and choses in action (including, but not exclusively, de- hcntures, notes, scrips, participation certificates, rights, subscriptions, option warrants, when issued securities, certificates (.f drposil, cho,c% in aclion, c%idence..,f indcblcdnrs>, (-erlificaues of indebtedness, certificates of interest of any and every kind and nature whatsoever, secured ill unsecured, whether represented by trust, participating and/or other certificates 01 ((!bet'\C'Im't. ;Irld Ihat .111 ()1'de1ln.,tl llrllills. writt('ll or• ot:d, 111 io11 sau(1 accoinit be given by either the President, �;ecrelar\•, '1'rca�urrr or Vice- President, of this corporation, and each of them is hercl,w authorized and directed to pur- chase :uul/or sell and/or deal in, through said BACIlE on behalf of this corporation, any and all stocks, bonds, other <ecurillvs. choses in action, that either of them may dean ncces;ary or advisable for this corporation, for cash, and also to make payment and to sign checks or drafts drawn upon the funds of the corporation, and also, for this corporation, 1.1 n ithdran from the said IIACI 11` f roill 11111c to lime, to dcliycr or aicepl delivery of, auld/or to borrow and/or to endorse, and/or to direct the transfer of record title of, any and all storks• bonds, other securitie-, choses in action, and/or assets or :,,lids that may lie carried by said BACHE for the account of this corporation, and Prt; cru 1: RI (u yl u, that cm -11 of till• afort::.aid officers of t1w, Corporation. be and herein• is authorized and directed 14- c\ccutc ani deliver on behalf of this corporation any customer's agreement required by BACHE, and to enter into, \, , III(• '111d (lriiyrr, any and all other agrecinctils, documents, release, and writings that play be required by said RAO IF for the opening and/or Continuing of said account in connection \with aun' transactions relating to said account ((r 1(- am securities, numcys or other properly of the corporation, whether or not in said account, and FlxrnI-a: RI•soLyt n, that until IIACITE shall receive due written notices of change or rescission of these resolu- tio1:�, said BAC 111: may -rely upon the authority contained in these resolutions as continuing fully effective, and the said 1,.\('111'. may rely tip,)n any certified copy of resolutions specimen Signatures or other writings, signed oil behalf of this ('((rp((Ialion b\ arty ofiiccr thereof; the acccplance of any other form of notice shall not constitute a waiver of this pro- 1uur shall the fact that any person hereby empowered ceases to be in officer or becomes an officer under some other title. in an\ \\ay ;llfect the powers hereby conferred, until 11AC'IIN. shall receive due written notice of change or rescis- slon. a� aforesaid, and I l'9'fll:h I:r•.;ol.\'tn, that in the event of any change in the office or powers of persons hereby empowered, the secre- 1.11\ sll:111 cerlii\ Ihosc cluingvs to iiACITF in writing, in the nl;Inner hereinabove specified, which notification, when i ccciycd, shall lie adequate both to terminate the powers of the person theretofore authorized, and to empower the per- ­11, lhcrcby submitted, and Frwrltrk RhsoI,vrI). that any and all orders and instructions heretofore given to said BACHE on behalf of this cor- p(lrali((n by a11\' Officer of this corporation, are hereby in all respects ratified, confirmed and approved, and diel\ Rl �ol.yrn, that the foregoing resolutions and the certificates actually furnished to BAC111. by any officer f file c(lrporalion, be and they hereby are made irrevocable, and shall he fully effective as to any transactions for the '',jilt of lilt, corpotalioll notwithstanding that the account clay have been temporarily closed or inactive, until writ - 1, 11 II-diic of the tt•yr,cation thereof shall have been received by PAI'lIF . I d(, further certify that the following are the signatures and titles of the persons authorized and empowered to act IUi 1" ll.d f of !ills corporatU,l1, plll-�,tlalll to the torcgoing Iesollltlolls; an(1 this t-esolutlon docs not conflict with the existing c"rporate charter (articles of in-corporatio al, and Bi-Laws. y_. �.............................. f................................ Chairman of Board of County �,ommissioners ' t oard of�Cou . C lmi .5ioners \, � I':r:i�lctll _.. ..... _............. _....... _. - ..:1......�..�:>r..�../_..........., } �\ ,:,mance Dire tor, Indi 1 River County, Florida I further (xlv*tp;�_illarthr�. rirp(naliun is duly organi•rcd and existing, and has t1 power to take the action til(.:lioruiaiid resolilli(in .' 19th I : \1•! �: N.1J;FI:rnF, i )MVChel"eutlto affixed 111Y band and the seal of the said corporation, this -- (AFFIX 0111,1'04AT10X, SEAT, � 2 , ......... ... . ....... ............. Clerk to Board of County Commissioners Printed in U.S.A. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CHAIRMAN`S SIGNATURE RE THE FOLLOWING DEPUTIES APPOINTED BY SHERIFF JOYCE: .JOSEPH C. FINK SIDNEY J. DUBOSE ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO.ALLOCATE FUNDS FOR GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No, INCREASE DECREASE INSURANCE & BONDS 01-2101-330.00 $5,000 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $5,000 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO CORRECT AN AMENDMENT APPROVED ON .JANUARY 25, 1979 FOR THE FINE & FORFEITURE FUND; THE AMENDMENT.SHOULD HAVE BEEN FOR GENERAL FUND, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE SALARIES 01-2102-102.00 $9,300 FICA & RET 01-2102-105.00 $1,417 WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION 01-2102-107.00 $ 32 EMPLOYEE INS. 01-2102-106.00 $ 985 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 01-2102-108.00 $ 10 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $11,744 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE FUNDS TO THE ACCOUNT WHICH PAYS THE STATE ATTORNEYS MONTHLY BILL, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE STATE ATTORNEY -RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES ACCOUNT N0. 03-2322-301.06 03-9990-701.00 INCREASE $2,350 DECREASE $2,350 B4K41 ut� SEP �. 91979 3 _ SEP 191979 BOOK 41 Nacf X18 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AS FOLLOWS:__ ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-2780-205.00 $ 150 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES -01-9990-701.00 $ 150 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DEcREAaE Misc. Exp. 01-2104-204.00 200 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $ 200 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO PAY FOR AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER TELEPHONE BILLS FOR THE COUNTY JUDGE-, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE COMMUNICATIONS 03-2324-335.00 $ 75 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 03-9990-701.00 $ 75 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE STATE AUDITORS TELEPHONE COST, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE COMMUNICATIONS 01-2101-335.00 $ 50 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $ 50 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO PAY FOR THE AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER TELEPHONE BILLS FOR THE TWO CIRCUIT JUDGES, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE COMMUNICATIONS 03-2322-335.00 $ 350 RE FOR C�ENCIES 03-9990— 350 4 s � � ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR MEDICAID, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT N0, INCREASE DECREASE NURSING HOME 01-5222-316,00 $ 90 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-801,00 $ 90 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR THE PARKS DEPARTMENT, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE Misc, Exp, 01-6102-204,00 $ 100 UTILITIES 01-6102-340.00 $ 500 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $ 600 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE ADVERTISING 01-2552-333.00 $ 50 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 01-9990-701.00 $ 50 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR THE ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO, INCREASE DECREASE Misc, Exp. 02-4102-204,00 $ 500 OFFICE SUPPLIES 02-4102-205.00 - $ 500 MAINT. OF BLDGS. & GROUND 02-4102-337.00 $ 150 MAINT. OF EQUIPMENT 02-4102-338,00 $2,500 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 02-4102-341.01 $ 150 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 02-9990-701,00- $3.800 BOOK Is A r Is SEP 19 1979 SEP 191979 aGK 41 FacE 520 THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE PROPOSAL FROM RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. FOR THE 1979-80 FISCAL YEAR WORKMENS COMPENSATION INSURANCE, AS FOLLOWS: Florida Municipal pelf -Insurer's Fund FUND ADMINISTRATOR: FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC. 225 WEST JEFFERSON STREET - POST OFFICE BOX 1757 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32302-TELEPHONE:1/800-342.8112 September 11, 1979 J BOARD OF TRUSTEES Mr. Jeffrey K. Barton CHAIRMAN Finance Officer ' JOHN BERTINO Indian River County MAYOR, DANIA 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 J. BLAKE DUNSON MAYOR, DADE CITY Dear Mr. Barton. WALTER W. FALCK MAYOR, TAMARAC Enclosed 1s a formal quotation for the Indian River County to loin the Florida Municipal Self -Insurer's Fund. NORMAN C. FLOYD, SR. MAYOR The program now has over 100 members, including six counties. En- ALTAMONTE SPRINGS •closed is a list of the members. JEFFERSON H. MILNER MAYOR, BOCA RATON At the end of the first year a dividend was declared averaging 21% to the mrnbers. This on top of the 15% advance discount amounted TROY J. PI LAND to savings of up to 40%. Enclosed is the formal dividend announce - MAYOR WINTER SPRINGS msnt and list of mg embers receiving. CLINTON R. WHITE A conplete breakdawi of how the program was originated and set up MAYOR 1s enclosed. This was prepared by .Raymond Sittig, Administrator of KENNETH CITY the Fund. v Finally, three applications are enclosed for menbership. Please complete all three applications and return to this office. Billing will be made by the Florida League of Cities. With premiums over $100,000 a 25% down payment, and monthly quarterly or semi-annually would be offered. Very truly yours, Ben W. Partridge Assistant Vice President Production Departnent BWP/JJ Enclosure cc: Raymond Sittig Area Suspense SERVICED BY: RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.- POST OFFICE BOX 20654 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32814-TELEPHONE:1/800-432.3976 SEP 191979 BO-OKAl MA ME 521 Fr__ I SEP 191979 52 COMPENSATION PIU h1 M ADJUS'1'I~If;NT - TRANSITION PROGRAM FUND NAME Florida M ni ci pal Sp l f -Insurer's Fund INSURED' S NAME Indian River County POLICY TERM_ 10/1479_1Q/1/8 , POLICY NO. EFF. DATE 10/1/79 Timr.TMTTM) PAvi?nT.T. RACTC I ,inn T.TMTTATTnN RASTS CODE CLASS PAYROLL RATE PREMIUM PAYROLL RATE PREMIUM 9 Street or Road Maintenance 395.770- 6.59 26,081 202,800 9.09 8 6319 Gas Main or Connection 93,597 8.27 7.741 41.600 13.47 5.504 7502 Gas Distributin-q 126,548 4.61 5,834 52,000 7:17 3,728 7720 8391 P l' c Auto Repair Shop 117,512. 6.14 5.00 58.64644,059 5,876 52,000 8.76 4 555 8810 Clerical 1,759,022 .28 4,925 754,000 .68 1 5,127 8868 College or School 21,273 .50 106 10,400 .96 100 9015 IBuildinqs NOC 195,497 5.58 10,909 119,600 7.90 9,448 9102 Park NOC 143,294 4.42 6,334 83,200 6.90 S,Q67 9403 Garbage, Ashes Collection 53,928. 10.20 5,501 31,200 14.19 4,427 9410 Munici nal 71,059 6.24 4,434 26,000 10.18 2,647 Total Manual. Premium 136.387 103 Fx erience Modification 78 .24 169,120 78 1.24 127 '964 Less Discount 15 25.368 TOTAL NORMAL PRrM.TIJM 143,752 1.08,769 Transition Credit Plus Transition 20 % 21-754 Total. Premium 130 523 Total Premium 130,523 SEP 191979 Florida Municipal Sell' -Insurer's FUND ADMINISTRATOR: FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC. 225 WEST JEFFERSON STREET -POST OFFICE BOX 1757 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32302-TELEPHONE:1/800.342-8112 Fund Atlantis 1. Eatonville 2. High Springs 3. Oviedo 4. BOARD OF TRUSTEES 5 Melbourne Village 6. Altamonte Springs 7. CHAIRMAN 8 JnHN BERTINO 9. MAYOR, DANIA 104. Lighthouse Point 10. J. SLAKE DUNSON ii MAYOR, DADE CITY 12 Orange City 13. WALTER W. FALCK 14. MAYOR, -PAMARAC 15. NORMAN C. FLOYD, SR.17 MAYOR . ALTAMONTE SPRINGS 18. 60. 19. JEFFERSON H. MILNER 20. MAYOR, BOCA RATON 21. TROY J.PILAND 22. MAYOR 23. WINTER SPRINGS 24. 63. 25.26. CLINTON R. WHITE Tamarac MAYOR Madison KENNETH CITY 27. 65. 28. 29. 66. 30. 112. 31. 67. 32. 113. 33. 68. 34. 114. 35. 69. 36. 11-5' 37. 70. 38. 39. 71. 40. 117. 41. 72. 42. 43. 73. 44. 118. 45. 74. 46. 119. 47. 75. 48. 49. 76. 50. SEP 191979 Florida Municipal Sell' -Insurer's FUND ADMINISTRATOR: FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC. 225 WEST JEFFERSON STREET -POST OFFICE BOX 1757 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32302-TELEPHONE:1/800.342-8112 Fund Atlantis 51. Eatonville 101. High Springs 52. Oviedo 102. Deerfield Beach 53. Melbourne Village Altamonte Springs 54. Mulberry 103. Apalachicola 55. South Bay 104. Lighthouse Point 56. Port St. Lucie 105. Davie 57. Orange City 106. Belleview 58. Golf 107. Wildwood 59. Blountstown 108. Chiefland 60. St. Petersburg B. Boca Raton 61. Beverly Beach 109. Eustis 62. Bronson Dania 63. Port Richey 110. Tamarac 64. Madison Apopka 65. Lee St. Augustine 66. Carrabelle 112. Hallandale 67. Shalimar 113. Vero Beach 68. Cape Coral 114. MacClenny 69. Sewall's Point 11-5' Winter. Springs 70. Coleman116. Fellsmere 71. Greenacres City' 117. Casselberry 72. Edgewater Lauderhill 73. Belleair Bluffs 118. Inverness 74. Gulf Breeze 119. Coconut Creek 75. Oldsmar Cooper City 76. Stuart Plantation 77. Seminole Mexico Beach 78. Sebastian West Melbourne 79. Ocoee Dade City 80. Clewiston Newberry 81. Royal Palm Beach Keystone Heights 82. Perry Palm Bay 83. Dixie County Lake Mary 84. Fruitland Park Auburndale 85. Sanibel Holmes Beach 86. Arcadia Jasper 87. Mascotte Edgewood 88. Manalapan Ponce Inlet 89. Baker County Tarpon Springs 90. Columbia County Hacienda Village 91. Inglis South Pasadena 92. Otter Creek Mangonia Park 93. Highland Beach Bunnell 94. Okeechobee County Mt. Dora 95. Micanopy Kenneth City 96. Key Colony Beach New Port Richey .97, Bowling Green Palmetto 98. Lake Clarke Shores Maitland 99. Chattahoochee Belleair Beach 100. Taylor County SERVICED BYs RISK MANAGEMENT ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32814 SERVICES. INC.- POST OFFICE BOX 20654 -TELEPHONE: 1/800.432-3976 Zephyrhills N. Smyrna Bc; Utilities Cor Baldwin Groveland Callaway Pembroke Park Hardee County North Redington Beach Florida League c Cities Appalachee RPC Indian Rocks .Beach Belleair Williston Archer North Lauderdal Crestview State Assoc. of County Comm. Miami Beach Cedar Key WK 1 PACE 523 I r SEP 19 1979 i lz P i? 4.1 %F524 FLORIDA MUNICIPAL SELF -INSURER'S FUND Background, Legal Basis The Florida Municipal Self -Insurer's Fund was established on November 10, 1977. This program was the culmination of League efforts to find less costly worker's compensation coverage for Florida municipalities. Under Florida law, a municipality is considered self-insured for worker's compensation if the jurisdiction does not retain an insurance carrier (F.S. 440.38(6)). Under F.S. 440.57, organizations of common interest are permitted to pool worker's compensation coverage, provided they meet the requirements set forth for ,self-insuring. These two laws provided the legal basis on which FMSIF was established. In addition, Article V11, Sec. 10 of the Florida Constitution, prohibiting joint and several liability of municipalities, provides the guide- line with which the fund operates. Each member Is liable for its own losses beyond the resources of the fund. .Organization rThe FMSIF is structured along the same lines as the Alabama Municipal Fund and the Alabama County Fund. Operation of the FMSIF is the responsibility of a Board of Trustees, who are elected governmental officials of member jurisdictions, serving staggered terms. The Trustees set policy for the fund; they determine el.lgibility for membership; standards of safety and education for members; guidelines for collection of premium; f1scal policy for funds; and they establish operating guidelines for contractees. The Florida League of Cities, Inc., under contract to the Board of Trustees of the FMSIF, serves as Administrator for the fund. The League has the authority under this agreement to act in behalf of the Trustees in admitting qualified applicants into the fund, maintaining members' SEP 191979 aooK 41 rmu 525 SEP 191979 BOOK 41. PAq 526 P. 2 records, billing members for premiums, and retaining premium collections, investing idle funds according to Trustee guidelines and making proper and timely disbursements for expenses. The Board of Trustees -has contracted with Risk Management Services, Inc., an insurance services company, for claims handling and safety engineering services. _Risk Management Services prepare and file all claims forms and reports, investigate and pay claims, -and provide representation at all necessary hearings, meetings, conventions, and administrative inquiries involving the interest of the fund and its members. Legal counsel is also provided by.the service company in the litigation directly related to claims. The service company also furnishes data necessary to prepare premium billings and conduct audits of the program. Each member is visited a minimum of twice a year by Risk Management safety engineers. The engineer reviews safety practices and procedures and makes recommendations to improve or correct conditions. Regular contact is made with members having poor loss ratios. Additionally, the service company has obtained reins.urance for the fund through Lloyd's of•London. Lloyd's of London provides specific excess coverage on the fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for each loss above the $100,000 reten- tion of the pool and $1,000,000 aggregate excess coverage -for losses occurring after depletion of 70% of the fund in any one year. Operation 6 Status The Florida Municipal Self -Insurer's Fund offers a 15% discount of standard Insurance rates to applicants. Fifteen percent is the maximum discount allowed by Florida law, and it is available to all applicants regardless.of premium volume. Applicants in the assigned risk pool save the additional 8% surcharge upon joining the fund. P. 3 In the first year of operation, 54 members joined the fund with a total premium of $1,580,787. This premium was nearly $280,000 less than the standard rated premium of these members. Seventy precent of the premium dollar is available for the payment of losses. In the first year, 70% of the premium amounted to $1,106,551. Total Incurred losses for.the first year were $1,068,381 or 67.6% of the total premium, which leaves a surplus after the year-end audit of over $38,000. With approval -of the Bureau of Worker's Compensation, the Board of Trustees may return this surplus to members as a dividend. In addition to total incurred losses falling well within the allocated loss fund, no member penetrated excess coverage on any claim the first year, There were 14 members, however, who closed the year with loss ratios greater than 70%. Of these 14 members, only 2 have maintained loss ratios,over 70% for the second year to date. The 300 of premium dollar that is not allocated to the loss fund is used to pay the fixed costs associated with the fundis operation. The fixed costs a4 broken down as follows: 15.45%1 pays for specific & aggregate reinsurances with Lloyd's of London (including the Florida premium receipt tax) 9.20% is the service fee of Risk Manage- ment Services, Inc. 3.3502 is the Dept. of Commerce tax for •funding of the Special Disability (Second Injury) Fund, and the Worker's Compensation Administration Fund 2.00% is the administrative fee of Florida League of Cities, Inc. 30.00% TOTAL SEP 191979 Boa 41 FAvF. 52 SEP 191979 BOOK 41 PAGF 528 P. 4 The fund is now half -way through the second year of operation. There are currently 105 members including 5 counties and the Florida League of Cities, Inc. The total normal premium for the second year exceeds $3.9 million and losses are running at 60% of.premium. The Trustees have directed that the loss fund money be invested until such time as it is needed. In the 18 months of the program, the fund has over $2.3 million invested and has earned over $100,000 of interest to date. a. lThe premium tax is levied against foreign insurance carriers based upon the volume of business done in Florida 2The.Special Disability Fund Tax was increased from 1.15% to 2.1q effective July 1,. 1978. Therefore., in the 4th quarter of FY 78, the Department of Commerce Tax was correspondingly increased to 4.3% and the loss fund allocation reduced to 69.05% with the approval of Lloyd's of London � � s .Florida MLIiiicil)al Self -Insurer's Fund r LIND'ADMIN1SI RA "I" I I ORIT"A Lt AGII( UI (.It If S, INC. 225 WEST JEFFER5UN SInEET — POST OFFICE BOX 1757 TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32302 — TELEPHONE: 1/800.342.8112 July 9, 1979 BOARD OF TRUSTEES M E M O,R A N D U M TO: FMSIF Members CHAIRMAN JOHN t1ERTINO MAYOR,DANIA FROM: FMSIF Administrator' J. BLAKE OUNSON RE: First Year's Fund MAYOR, DADE CITY WALTER W. FALCK MAYOR, TAMARAC The Board of Trustees of the FMSIF recently met to consider some NORMAN C.FLOYD,SR, important issues regarding the self-insurance fu,id. MAYOR ALTAMONTE SPRINGS The final audit•for the first year Of operation was.reviewed and a copy is enclosed for your information. As reported in the JEFFERSON H.MILNER MAYOR-.BOCARATON final audit, the fund showed an unappropriated surplus of $42,567 as of September 30, 1978, As of May 31, 1979, the FY 77-78 fund -TROY J. PILAND year has experienced an increase in uanppropriated surplus as a MAYOR result of claims settlements and reductions in open claims WINTER SPRINGS reserves. The monthly loss report for May indicates an unappro- CLiNTONR.WHITE priated surplus in the fund of $175,318.94'= with 62 claims MAYOR. remaining open for FY 77-78• The Trustees voted at their recent KENNETH CITY meeting to declare $175,000 of surplus and interest as dividends „•• to,FY 77-78 members In good standing. A member, to be eligible for a dividend,'must have a loss ratio in the May 1979 Loss Report of less than 70%. The lower the loss ratio of an individual member, the larger will be their dividend; however, Trustees set a maximum dividend of an individual member at -25% of normal premium. The enclosed list shows the eligible FY 77-78 members and the amount of dividend that has been declared for them. The distribution is determined by an approved allocation formula, also explained in the enclosure. Members will receive their dividend in October 1979, The Trustees also approved a new payment plan which will become effective October 1, 1979. While all members are urged to pay their entire annual premium at the beginning of each FY, the Trustees realize that this is frequently difficult due to lack of revenues, investment policies, etc. Therefore, -in order'to be flexible yet maintain uniformity in paying premiums, the following schedule will be available to members beginning October 1, 1979 47110 May Loss Reonrl was calculated on a 70", loss fund. Actually, the toss /rind was 69 76% (see footnote 1 ) which resulted In a reduction In surplus of 13,794. For purposes of dividend distribution, surplus is $171.525. SEP 191979 SERVICED BY: RISK MANAGrMENT SERVICES. INC. — POST OrrlCE Rol: 20654 ORLANDO, rLORIDA 32814 — TELEPIION1:t 1/800432.3976 Boa 41 FnE529 SEP 191979 On renewal: Baas 41 PnE5:30 members with annual premium less than $50,000 may pay •50% before October 31, and the balance before January 8 of the next year. members frith annual premiums between $50,000 and $100,000 may pay 50% before October 31 and 25% on or before January 8, and 25% on or before April 1, of the next year. members with annual premium greater than $100,000 .may pay 25%,before October 31, and the balance in eleven equal monthly installments on or before the lst of each month, beginning November 1. This policy will be strictly enforced and no exceptions will be made unless specifically authorized by the Trustees. On renewal premiums, members will be assessed an additional 5% of the minimum amount due, if sufficient payment as described in the above plan is made during the grace period between October 2 and October 31. All renewal billings will be sent to members early in September and twill be accompanied by a 30 day cancellation notice Which becomes effective October 31. If payment is not received by then, the member is effectively cancelled and must re -apply to the Fund. A 30 day cancellation notice will also accompany interim billings such as installment billings or revised esti- mated billings. Whenever a revised estimated billing results in additional premium due the Fund, the additional premium will be pro -rated over the remaining installment periods. Accounts with no balance due have 30.days to pay additional premium assess- ment.•• -Members will not be assessed a 5% penalty for payment within the 30 day-4grace period for interim billings. The Administrator wishes to advise all members that they will -be billed approximately the same premium as they paid this -year. It may however be prudent to budget an additional loo for w/c Premium. Factors that will affect next year's premium are: 1. Significant changes in payrolls between last premium billing date and September 30. 2. Significant changes in job classifications between last billing date and September 30. 3. Significant change in exp, mod, between last billing date and September 30. 4. Reduction of rates as defined by Section 125, 79-40, Laws of Florida. D E—A -I Trustees have made every effort to insure the financial integrity of your fund, while providinq a workable payment plan for individual members. If any member forsees difficulty In meeting the requi'r•ements for payment of premiums they should contact the Administrator immediately. The following table indicates member cities of the FY 78 Fund Year which will receive a dividend, and the amount of the dividend. The Trustees declared from surplus of the Loss Fund and Interest, $175,000.to be paid as a dividend to those members who maintained a loss ratio (as of the May 1979 Loss Report) of 70% or less. There were 43 eligible members out of 54. The eleven members who experienced losses greater than 70% created a fund deficit of $239,226,' This deficit was taken into account in determining the amount of dividend due to the eligible 43 members. The Board of Trustees approved the following distribution formula. TOT. DIVIDEND (1) Surplus 2 -+ Fund Deficit T37.= Surplus Distribution Factor (4 (1) Fund'Surplus + $3,475 of Interest to be declared as a dividend. _ $175,000 {2) Net Surplus of Premiums after all expenses, claims and reserves have been deducted, _ $171,525 .(3) Excess losses of eleven members = $239,226 (4) S.D.F. = 175,000 (declared) = .42605 171,525 + 239,22 (5) Member's*Surplus.X .42605 = Member's Dividend` Members whose dividends exceeded 25% of their normal premium we're adjusted down to 25% and the excess_ dividend was reallocated, SEP 191979 BOwt-531 ri 101 102 1011 105 i09 110 12 14 15 16 17 018 0i9 020 022 023 025 026 028 030 032 033 034 035 037 038 039 040 041 043 o44 045 o46 o48 o49 052. 053 054 056 057 059 o6o SEP 191979 .4 '1lcmber Name Normal Lo55 rrem i um x .(mu,, • I tied ioo1�41 PAGE 532 LM*- e DIvidr.nd 7 of (Aliditr.(1) SUI 1)1U;x.4:i,a-, (AdjUStCd) 1,remIUri) Atlantis High Springs 5/609 7,801 3,913. 5,442 0 3,913 Alt,imonte Springs 96,072 67,020 0 1818211 5,11112 48 196 Apala,:hicola Belleview 12,556 5,607 8,759 817 7,9112 Chiefland 8,599 3,911 51999 70 1180 3,8111 5,519 Boca Raton Eustis 2111,955 168,788 85,989 81 799 Tamarac 52,016 68,683 36,286 47,913 21,502 45,1118 14,7811 21495 Apopka St. Augustine 55,109 69;704 38,444 48,626 3,720 34,724 liallandale 1581698 110,708_ 33,758 86,847 14,868 23,861 Vero Beach Macctenny 99,400 8,628 69,341 6 019 27,858 41,1183 Winter Springs 9 806 6841 333 3,200 5,686 3,6111 Fellsmere Casselberryi,746 _ 2,526 31,279 1,762 z1 820 16 14 779 1 17,041 Lauderhill Coconut Creek 75,522 8,154 52 684 45,750 6,934 Cooper City 31,538 5,688 22,001 88 13, 186 5,600 _.8,815 .Mexico Beach West Melbourne 3,301 4,697 2,303 85 2,218 - Lake Mary_ 4,406 3,277 3,074 2,500 79 777 2,995 Dade City 13,257 9,248 503 8,7115 Newberry333 Palm Bay 2 969 24,858 .2,071 17,3141 1,010 1,738 Holmes Beach 3,.848 2,684 282 16,331 2,402 Jasper Auburndale 5,733 15,976 3,999 11;145 1,522 429 2,1177 Edgewood 1,643 1,-146 0 10,716 1,146 Ponce Inlet Hact•enda Village 1,177 801 821 559 0 821 Bunnell 2,541 1,773 0 .0 559 1,773 Mangonia Park Mount :Dora 1,126 11,4�q 785 8,022 150 1,166 635 Kenneth City 2, ,1 1,514 68 6,856 1,446 Eatonville New Port Richey 1,221 11,097 852 7,7111 133 719 Be 1 1 ea i t Beach 622 1434 901 0 6.,8110' 1+311 - Mulberry. 1,770 1,235 2 10233 156 Coleman Melbourne Village 322 1456 225 318 0 225 Port St. Lucie 25 17 0 0 318 17 1111 11 members 416,009 14=43 1,580,787 J 290,208 1,102,7571 529.14314 931,232 (239.226) 171,52,2 I ,1102 1,950- 21,580 3,139 i ,402 2,150 37,075 6,620 1,117 13,717 6,658 10,685 18,575 2,157 1,631 63z 7,630 3,104 2,039 3/947 825 31, 8 1,102 3,314 742 6,215 962 1,109 3,9911 4ti 2'914 200 635 282 2/875 543 305 2, 714 1;43 sl 6 0 115,000 21 Av .1 25 25 22 25 25 25 15 13 25 to 1 19 25 17-- 25 24 25 13 25 .25 25 25 25 25 19 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 For the last quarter of FY 78, the Bureau of Worker's Compensation increased their assess- ment for the Second Injury Fund by .95q. The funds set aside to pay this increase came from the 70% loss fund., reducing in to 69.05 for one quarter ,ind making the average allocation to the loss fund for the entire year 69,76 of norm,il premll:m. Total surplus as indicated.tn the table mounts to $1110,751. After deducting excess losses of $239,226, net surplus is $171,525. APPLICATION TO FLORIDA MUNICIPAL SELF -INSURER'S FUND NOTIFICATION TO DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NAME: ADDRESS: NATURE OF BUSINESS: LIST OFFICIALS OR CORPORATE OFFICERS: I: Name: Title: O Corporation III. Name: Title: H. Name: IV. Name: Title: Title: ❑ Other INSURANCE COVERAGE IS NOW CARRIED BY: I (we) hereby formally apply for continuing membership for Workmen's Compensation Self -Insurance coverage in the above- named fund, to be effective 12:01 a.m., ,19 , and, if accepted by its duly authorized representative, do hereby constitute and appoint the Florida League of Cities, Inc., to act as Administrator(s) of the Fund as our agent(s)-in-fact in all Matters relating to the Workmen's Compensation Law and/or Employer's Liability Act. I (we) further agree as follows: (a) To accept and be bound by the provisions of the Florida Workmen's Compensation Act; (b) That, by this reference, the terms and provisions of the Indemnity Agreement and/or Amendments thereto filed or which may hereafter be filed with the Florida Department of Commerce are hereby adopted, approved, ratified and confirmed by us; and further, I (we) agree to assume all of the obligations set forth therein, and in the event I (we) will pay any premium the date the same shall become due, I (we) will pay all cost of the collection thereof, including reasonable attorney's fee and the maximum rate of interest allowed by law on any past due premiums; (c) To abide by the rules and regulations of the Trustees of the Fund and to conform to the terms of the agreements they may enter into with any authorized service company as long as we remain a member of the Fund; (d) That, in the event of any changes in corporate or business structure, or in legal entity, or if any locations are to be added to or deleted from this coverage, I (we) agree to notify Florida Municipal Self -Insurer's Fund immediately; (e) That should I (we) desire to cancel our coverage, I (we) will give written notice at least 30 days prior to cancellation, and that the Fund will give written notice 30 days prior to cancellation should they desire to cancel our coverage; (f) That coverage under this membership shall be for Florida operations only; (g) That the Wage Declaration Schedule (Form No. ) and/or Renewal Certificates, when completed and returned to us by Florida Municipal Self -Insurer's Fund, become a part of this agreement. I WITNESSES TO SIGNATURE: 5, Name of Applicant Name 2. 7. Officials or Corporate Officer Address 9. CORPORATE SEAL 3. 6. City/Town Clerk 4. Date: 8. Name Address . (Signature may be notarized in place of witnesses) ISA MEMBER OFTHE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC. AND IS HEREBY APPROVED FOR MEMBERSHIP IN THIS FUND, AND COVERAGE ISEFFECTIVETHE DAY OF , 19 . SIGNEDTHIS BY: DAY OF Fund Administrator/Trustee ,19 SEP 191979 BO 53 BOOK 41 Fn,F 534 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PROPOSAL FROM RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE STATE FITNESS PAY ROLLS, COUNTY COURT, AUGUST TERM, 1979, IN THE AMOUNT OF $152.62. RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK: REPORT OF TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU - SPECIAL TRUST FUND, FOR AUGUST, 1979. REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, CIRCUIT COURT, AUGUST, 1979. RECEIPT FOR DEPOSIT OF COUNTY FUNDS, FROM SHERIFF JOYCE, CHECK #11964 — $798.80; CHECK #12007 — $622.80.. CERTIFICATE OF THE 1979 TAX LEVY - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - ST. ,JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; AND RESOLUTION N0. 79-11 ADOPTING THE TAX RATE AND CERTIFYING THE LEVY OF .067 MILL FOR DISTRICT PURPOSES; AND A LEVY OF .072 MILL FOR GREATER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN. TRAFFIC VIOLATION FINES BY NAME, AUGUST, 1979. THE BOARD DECIDED TO DELAY AGENDA ITEMS 4, 5, AND 6 RELATING TO APPOINTMENTS TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY AND THE PROPOSED NEW TELEPHONE SYSTEM UNTIL ANOTHER MEETING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR JUDITH A. WAKEFIELD, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR, AND PETE SPYKE, AGRICULTURAL SPECIALIST, AS FOLLOWS: JUDITH WAKEFIELD: SEPT. 11 FT. PIERCE SEPT. 26 COCOA (EVENING) OCT. 8-10 GAINESVILLE OCT. 30 ORLANDO OCT. 31 BARTOW RETROACTIVE APPROVAL FOR COUNTY EMERGENCY BOARD MEETING DISTRICT XII 4-H COUNCIL MEETING ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE FOR COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTORS - ON STATE TRAVEL FUNDS CLOTHING TRAINING - ON STATE TRAVEL FUNDS CONSUMER -RELATED LAWS TRAINING - ON STATE TRAVEL FUNDS PETE SPYKE: SEPTEMBER 25 LAKE ALFRED INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT CITRUS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING OCTOBER 1 GAINESVILLE MEETING WITH DR. CALLOWAY AND DR. JAMES APP, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD THAT THE COST OF HAVING THE DAY MARKERS INSTALLED FOR VERO ISLES IS $6,572.02 (13 DAY MARKERS @ $505.54 EACH). ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH A. GROVER FLETCHER CO., ROSELAND, FLORIDA, FOR INSTALLATION OF 13 DAY MARKERS FOR VERO ISLES IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,572.02. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE AGENDA REGARDING MITCHELL ESTATES, ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON EXPLAINED THERE WAS CON- FUSION CONCERNING THE ROAD ON THE PLAN FOR MITCHELL ESTATES. ATTORNEY COLLINS SAID HE WAS INFORMED THAT THE CITIZENS OF COLONIAL TERRACE OBJECTED TO THE ROAD THAT MITCHELL BUILDERS WAS CONSTRUCTING AND STATED THE BOARD DID NOT GIVE APPROVAL FOR THE ROAD TO COME THROUGH. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAD SPECIFIC RECOLLECTION OF THIS MATTER AND THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE BOARD, AND SUGGESTED THE BOARD SCHEDULE DISCUSSION ON THIS AT THE NEXT MEETING. CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT HE WAS FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA AND REMEMBERED A BASIC 1/2 STREET BEING APPROVED. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE SUB- DIVISION WAS DESIGNED NOT TO HAVE THROUGH TRAFFIC. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT MITCHELL BUILDERS SHOULD BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW THAT THE BOARD REVISED THEIR ORIGINAL PLAN, SINCE WE CANNOT FIND WHERE IT WAS REVISED. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER EXPLAINED THAT SEVERAL SETS OF PLANS WERE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S FILE; AND STATED THAT MITCHELL BUILDERS ARE NOT GOING TO PUT IN A WATER PLANT, BUT USE CITY WATER INSTEAD. SEP 19 1979 21 Bou 41 mu 535 SEP 191979 Boog 41 PAGE 536 14 ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED HIM THAT THE COUNTY HAS SPECIFICALLY GRANTED A WATER FRANCHISE TO MITCHELL BUILDERS. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON RECOMMENDED THAT THE STAFF RESEARCH THIS FURTHER, LOOKING BACK TO THEIR FRANCHISE DISCUSSION WITH MITCHELL BUILDERS. HE REPORTED THAT THE ROAD WORK HAS BEEN STOPPED ON THE PROJECT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS— SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATORS RECOMMENDATION TO RESEARCH THIS MATTER AND IN— STRUCTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SHOULD COME UP WITH A PROCEDURE OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED A REQUEST FROM ATTORNEY NORMAN A. GREEN FOR A SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ORDINANCE 74-20, AS PER THE FOLLOWING LETTER: August 10, 1979 Jack G. Jennings, Administrator Indian River County Board of Commissioners 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Re: Northrup property sale to Humphrey Dear 4r. Jennings: Please be advised that I represent Mr. and ?yrs. Charles W. Humphrey of Sebastian, Florida. They intend to purchase the following described property: The Northwest corner of Lot 41 of A.A. Berry Subdivision, Section 21, Township 30 South, Range 38 East, Fleming Grant, containing approximately 1.65 acres (copy of contract enclosed) ;his property is located on the Sebastian River with the nearest County road being Roseland Road (see sketch of information enclosed). As you aan see by the enclosed sketch, the Northrup property is landlocked and not on a County road, however, there is an easement thirty feet wide for ingress and egress (see copy of official m,3�ordn enclosed). In addition, we will be able to obtain the consent of Messrs. Van"eVoorde and Siddiqui, the adjoining property ornery. 4y client would like to be placed on the Indian River County Co=nission agenda for the next available meeting in order that the Commission declare that the property in question be permitted to have an exception to Ordinance 74-20 in order that the new purchaser or any subsequent purchaser may build one singk& fanily residence that would conform to the Baster Plan of the Zoning Department. Please be kind enough to advise me as to the meeting at which we will be required to attend. If any further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, NOF.MAN A. GREEN ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION TO ORDINANCE N0. 74-20 AS REQUESTED FOR MR. AND MRS. CHARLES W. HUMPHREY. ASSISTANT PLANNER MARSH APPEARED IN REGARD TO A REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF SIDE LOT EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 15 AND 16, BLOCK 10, KINGS HIGHLAND SUBDIVISION AS REQUESTED BY JOHNNIE AND MARGARET THORNTON. HE EXPLAINED THAT THERE CURRENTLY IS FILL IN THE SWALE IN LOT 1, WHICH IS BACKING WATER UP TO THE LOT. STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO INFORM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT OF THIS, AND MR. MARSH ADVISED THAT THEY SHOULD NOT ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY UNTIL THE FILL IS REMOVED. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF IT WOULDN'T BE BETTER TO EXECUTE THE RELEASE OF EASEMENTS AFTER THE SWALE WAS CLEARED, AND MR. MARSH EXPLAINED THAT THIS PROBLEM IS NOT THE FAULT OF THE APPLICANT, BUT OF THE ADJOINING LANDOWNER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 79-82 APPROVING RELEASE OF SIDE LOT EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 15 AND 16, BLOCK 10, KINGS HIGHLAND SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY JOHNNIE AND MARGARET THORNTON, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN; THESE DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT. SEP 191979 23 SEP 191979 soox 41 mF 538 RESOLUTION NO. 79-82 WHEREAS, there is drainage and utility easement on each side of the lot lines of KINGS HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION, Block 10, as filed in Plat Book 4, page 90, Indian River County, Florida, records, and WHEREAS, Johnny Thornton and Margaret Thornton, his wife, are the owners of Lots 15 and 16, Block 10, KINGS HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION, Plat Book 4, page 90, Indian River County, Florida, WHEREAS, said property is in site plan approved for erection of a building on said lots, which said building will lie over side lot line easement on South side of Lot 16 and the North easement of Lot 15, of Block 10, KINGS HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, as follows: 1. The Board does hereby release the 3 foot side lot line easement over the North 3 feet of Lot 15 and the South 3 feet of Lot 16, Block 10 of said KINGS HIGHLANDS, but it is specifically understood that the side Lot line easement on the South side lot line of Lot 15 and the North side lot line of Lot 16 will remain in full force and effect. 2. That the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners be authorized to sign a Release of Easement as above set out, and to have said Release recorded in the Public Records of Indian River, County, Florida. Dated this 19th day of September, 1979. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: xw� 0-24kd*h- William C. Wodtke, J., Chairman tr ATTEST: FREDA WRIGH CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT BY: RELEASE OF EASEMENT THIS RELEASE OF EASEMENT, made and executed this 19th day Of September, 1979, between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, party of the first part, and JOHNNY THORNTON and MARGARET THORNTON, his wife, parties of the second part; WITNESSETH: For and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 ($10.00) DOLLARS and other good and valuable considerations, in hand paid by the parties of the second part, the receipt whereof being here- by acknowledged, the said party of the first part does herewith release, discharge and quit claim unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs, legal representatives, and assigns, forever, the easements in favor of the party of the first part on real property situated in Indian River tounty, Florida, which said easements are as follows: The North 3 feet of Lot 15 and The South 3 feet of Lot 16, All on Block 10, KINGS HIGHLANDS SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 90 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part, by virtue of the authority vested by law in the Board of County Commissioners, and for and on behalf of the County of Indian River, State of Florida, have caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Chairman and its seal to be affixed, attested by its Clerk of the Circuit Court. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: SEP 191979 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: 7ZA&A C e William C. Wodtke, Jrr, Chairman ATTEST: FREDA WRIGHT, Clerk of the BOOK �� Circuit Court BY: vZ,r AL_ , �_ r SEP 1919 79 BOOK STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, State of Florida, and acknowledged before me :-7 41 PAGE 540 executing the above and foregoing instrument, in the presence of two subscribing witnesses, freely and voluntarily, under the authority duly vested in him by Law, and that the Seal of the said Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, State of Florida, affixed thereto is the true seal of the foregoing. WITNESS, my hand and official seal in the State and County this 19th day of October, 1979. " �. �- '.4 - Notary Pu c, State of Flo ida at Large Ur My commission expires: NOTARY KSLI C STATE OF FLORIDA AT LA My COMMISSION EMUS J Y 9 1982 SEA THPJJ GENERA 1M. lJ3WWAMS (SEAL) DISCUSSION ENSUED REGARDING A PROGRAM THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS DEVELOPING TO REFINE THE PROCEDURE FOR ABANDONMENT OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY, RELEASE OF EASEMENTS, ETC.; FORM LETTERS ARE BEING DEVELOPED WHICH WILL BE MAILED TO THE POTENTIALLY AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS, AND A FEE SCHEDULE WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE APPLICATION PROCEDURES. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT SINCE MANY RELEASES OF EASE- MENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED, AN APPLICATION FEE WOULD HELP PAY FOR PROCESSING, PLUS RECAPTURING THE COST OF THE PROPERTY GIVEN AWAY, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR ABANDONMENT OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY, RELEASE OF EASEMENT, ETC., TO BE DISCUSSED AT A FUTURE MEETING. ASSISTANT PLANNER MARSH NEXT DISCUSSED RELEASE OF SIDE LOT EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK B, OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY RICHARD AND ARLYNE ZORC, AND STATED THAT THE APPLICATION IS IN ORDER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 79-83 APPROVING RELEASE OF EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK B, OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION, AS REQUESTED BY RICHARD AND ARLYNE ZORC, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN; THESE DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT. SEP 191979 27 BOOK 4 1 PAVE 541 41 7 SEP 191979 RESOLUTION N0. 79-83 R��4` RAuE 542 WHEREAS, there is a drainage and utility easement on each side of the side lines of OSLO PARK, as filed in Plat Book Book 3, page 96, Indian River County, Florida, records: and WHEREAS, Richard J. 'Lorc, and Arlyne A. 'Lorc, his wife, are the owners of Lots 5 and 6, Block B. of Oslo Park, herein- before described; and WHEREAS, said property is under Contract for Sale and the prospec- tive purchasers are contemplating the erection of a building on said lots, which said building will lie over the side lot line easements on each side of the boundry line between Lots 5 and 6. WHEREAS, the said Purchasers will not complete said sale unless and until such side lot line easements are released by the County Commission of Indian River County, Florida= NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'T RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, as follows: 1. The Board.does hereby release the 2.5 foot side lot line easement on either side of the side lot line between Lots 5 and 6 on Block B, of said Oslo Park, 2. That the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners be auth- orized to sign a Release of Easement as above set out, and to have said Release recorded in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Dated this 19th day of September , 1979. BOARD OF COUNTY.COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, LORIDA By G�i a.l iam C. Wo tke, pikirman ATTEST: !�J CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COU RELEASE OF EASEMENT PHIS RELEASE OF EASEMENT, made and executed this 19th day of September 19791 between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, part of the first part, and Richard J. Zorc, and Arlyne A. Zorc, his wife, parties of the second parte WITNESSETH r For and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND N01100 (10.00) Dollars and other good valuable considerations, in hand paid by the party of the second part, the receipt whereof being hereby acknowledged, the said party of the first part does herewith release, discharge and quit claim unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs# legal representatives, and assigns, forever, the 'easements in favor of the party of the first part on real property situated in Indian River County, Florida, which said easements are as followsa The South 2.5 feet of Lot 6 The North 2.5 feet of Lot 5 All on Block B of OSLO PARK, according to the Plat thereof filed in the office of the Clerk of the Curcuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, in Plat Book 3page 961 said land lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first party, by virtue of the authority vested by law in the Board of County Commissioners, and for and on behalf of the County of Indian River, State of Florida, have caused there presents to be executed in its name by its Chairman and its seal to be affixed, attested by its Clerk of the Circuit Court. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: / n y SEP 191979 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE S OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY* F 0 IDA r William C.,Wodtke, Cha ATTESTa FREDA WRIGHT, Clerk of the Circuit Court (seal) AGK 41 cAG,E 543 SEP 191979 now. 41 FAu .X44 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this --day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledg- ments, personally appeared WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., as Chairman of the Board of.County Commissioners of Indian River County, State of Florida and acknowledged before me executing the above and foregoing instru- ment, in the presence of two subscribing witnesses, freely and vol- untarily, under the authority duly vested in him by Law, and that the Seal of the said -Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County$' State of Florida, affixed thereto in the true seal of the foregoing. Witness my hand and official seal in said State and County this z day of ,1979. Notary PWlict 5 t6. -Of or da at Large My Commission Expirest NOTARY FLK IC S'''t ? ItORIIDA AT t My COM IC 1. . c "I'V , t ; ti $ TH&U G:'J 45 UNDERWAITEU ® � r ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR DAVID REVER, PLANNING DIRECTOR, TO ATTEND APA NATIONAL PLANNING CONFERENCE IN BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, OCTOBER 12 TO OCTOBER 17, 1979, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR DAVID REVER AND PLANNING STAFF MEMBERS TO ATTEND THE FLORIDA PLANNING & ZONING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE IN HAINES CITY, FLORIDA, NOVEMBER 14 TO NOVEMBER 17, 1979; THE STAFF ATTENDANCE TO BE STAGGERED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PLANNING OFFICE WILL NOT BE UNATTENDED, AND TO INCLUDE THE ATTENDANCE OF DICK BIRD, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, OR ANY MEMBER OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR ANY COMMISSIONER, THE ATTORNEY, THE ADMINISTRATOR OR DESIGNATE, TO ATTEND THE STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FLORIDA MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1979 AT PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA. THE BOARD NEXT CONSIDERED WABASSO BEACH PARK IMPROVEMENTS AS PRESENTED BY DAVID MARSH IN THE FOLLOWING MEMOS DATED AUGUST 6TH AND SEPTEMBER 11TH: SEP 191979 31 Aaa� PnC545 SEP 19 1979 August G, 1979 100 TO: Jack G. Jennings, County Administrator FROMjyd David Marsh, Planner SUBJECT: Wabasso Beach Park Improvements Bom 41 FAUE546 The following represents a summary of the Planning Department recommendations with respect to the proposals submitted by the North County group with which we met, and additionally the initial recommendations contained in the July 26, 1979 demo to Neil Nelson (see attached copy). 1) Existing poles along bluff line be relocated approximately 50 feet west. Parking to still be allowed along the new hedge row. 2) Boardwalk to be placed approximately 10 - 12 feet behind the bluff line with dune vegetation being spotted around the walkway and crossovers, and also along the hedge row. 3) Parking be restricted from existing southern picnic area and also the northern area which is slated for future improvements. 4) That unless a more suitable location is found, the proposed relief station/storage building be situated in a central location easily accessible to both existing and proposed picnic areas. If permitting is possible, the proposed relief station/storage building could be located farther to the east abutting the coastal setback line. A 9-0 X 20 building should be adequate. The proposed playground unit could be relocated to the north picnic area which would allow more parking area. 5) Should the fencing be removed from the park perimeter, that pro- visions be made to install either a vandal proof facility or secure the immediate area with fencing. Adequate funds for both the general upgrading with boardwalk -crossovers and revegetation, and the proposed relief station, are not currently budgeted. As indicated in the July 26, 1979 memo to Neil Nelson, the proposed Phase I improvement program does not include provisions for the requested relief station. Thus additional funds need to be sought if the relief station is to be constructed. The elimination of proposed boardwalk -crossovers and 4 L —1 M Jack G. Jennings August 6, 1979 Page -2- revegetation of the general bluff line area in order to build the restroom/ showers is not recommended. Stabilization of the general bluff line area is felt to be very important, and the dune structure and vegetation should not be removed from the Phase I development plan. A possible solution could be to seek additional funding through grant funds - for the relief/storage building and other needed improvement, and then use the budgeted $25,000. for matching funds. It is felt that plans should be formulated to acquire additional land to the south of the park because future growth will almost certainly bear out the need for additional parking, and very possibly additional beach front as well. It is hoped that these recommendations will be considered in the overall deliber- ations. Should you have any questions or comments or need additional inform- ation, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. DM: j t Enclosure SEP 191979 � � 41 PAGE 54 r SEP 191979 POOK 4 1 FAUE 548 7 • ; 14ABASSO DEVELOPMENT PLAN Proposed.Phase I Improvements - July 26, 1979 Fencing (already installed) $ 5,300.00 Boar&aalk and crossovers (2) @ 5.00 sq. ft. X 2500 sq. ft. 12,500.00 Gazebo @ 8.00 sq. ft. X 200 sq. ft. 11600.00 Top Soil and Sod 21000.00 lants and shrubs) 2,x00.00 ' Landscaping (p . Railroad ties and/or poles 1$00.00 Paint and hardware., ctc. - 600.00 Resurface existing road (22 ft.) "0' $ 26,000.00 '.(It should be noted that restroom and shower facilities, barbeque -grills.and a new life guard tourer are needed as soon as possible.) e ' y '� � 7J �:� �"`'="• � �� �'4^�'.� �'���� � �+�v ` c i ,Y � ;ice; ��.•,+j""'e�� t a i �afl - :,� \ ,. 1cr.1s.4 � Wa_3 4 1. •e�.b� .�' r.«..:.4 Lw,cM ,� a� Gm�! � � ��f� � �� -•C`'� .. t�`� r^� �^;,.. � ..��--..._ter,.' {.:• r; ;�;�.;,, ..q �'Z.,,�� }� I'• /�; l SII .LAol 1 1 SEP 191979 my 41 FacE 55® September 11, 1979 MEMO TO: ��Booaard of County Commissioners FROM: "`"Davin Marsh, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Wabasso Beach Park Improvements This memo is intended as a supplement to the August 6, 1979 memo to the County Administrator (attached). It should be noted that this department has attempted to incorporate those suggestions submitted by the interested parties from the North County. The only recommendation which was not followed was the proposed relocation of the Relief Station to the northern portion of the park. It is the staff's opinion that this facility should remain in a centralized location. Some additional areas which deserve attention include the recent damage to the beach and bluff line caused by hurricane David. Provisions should be made to replenish the bluff line with substantial amounts of sand fill to prevent further erosion. Other needed improvements which would be best accomplished in con- junction with the proposed Phase I development include: 1) Repair or replacement of the lifeguard tower 2) Additional barbeque grills, tables and waste containers 3) restroom and shower facilities/with storage room As discussed in the August 6, 1979 memo, there is the possibility of utilizing the $25,000. budgeted for improvements as a matching commitment for a future DNR Recreation Development Assistance Grant, Bureau'of Outdoor Recreation or other program. It is our understanding that funds are available and that the County can apply for a $35,000. grant through this particular program. Generally beach front park development is considered as high priority for applicable federal and state grant programs. Finally, it should be noted that some refinements in the overall plan will likely need to be made prior to actual development. Provisions for fencing, landscaping and additional cable,ties,and poles will need to be added in order to allow for safe, efficient traffic circulation and parking areas,security for physical improve- ments, and closing in of vehicular areas to insure that cars, dune buggies and cycles cannot encroach on the bluff line or the beach. Please note the attached general cost estimates which were developed on the basis of verbal estimates obtained by Bob Berg back in April of 1978. These new estimates allow for a 20% inflation factor. Should you have any questions or comments, please advise. DM : j t Enclosures ASSISTANT PLANNER MARSH STATED THAT SEVERAL OF THE RECOM- MENDATIONS FROM THE NORTH COUNTY GROUP WERE USED BUT STAFF DID NOT AGREE WITH THE RELOCATION OF THE RESTROOM AND SHOWER FACILITY TO THE NORTH PORTION OF THE PARK; THEY FELT IT WOULD BE BEST IN A CENTRALIZED AREA, HE CONTINUED THAT THERE IS A PARKING PROBLEM, AND THEY HAVE TRIED TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING. MR. MARSH STATED THAT THE NORTH COUNTY GROUP INDICATED THEY WISHED TO LEAVE THE PARKING LOT IN GRASS AND MARL, AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONCURRED, HE NOTED THAT THERE IS A 60/40 CHANCE OF RECEIVING A STATE GRANT FOR THESE IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE COUNTY WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR $30,000 TO $35,000 IN MATCHING FUNDS. MR. MARSH COMMENTED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO FILE THE APPLICATION, HOLD THE EXISTING BUDGETED FUNDS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE GRANT WAS APPROVED OR DENIED, AND WAIT UNTIL EARLY NEXT YEAR; THE FUNDS THAT ARE IN THE COUNTY BUDGET WOULD CONSTITUTE THEIR MATCHING FUNDS. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE RESTROOMS BEING BUILT BY THE NORTH COUNTY GROUP, AND IT WAS DECIDED -IT WOULD BE BEST IF THE COUNTY DID THE PARK AND THE NORTH COUNTY GROUP COULD DO THE LANDSCAPING UNDER SUPERVISION. COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THESE RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED OR BE PLACED ON A BILLBOARD IN THE PARK WITH A NOTICE THAT THIS WAS THE COUNTY'S PROPOSAL, AND ASK FOR COMMENTS BY A CERTAIN DATE. HE ALSO SUGGESTED DISPLAYING THE -PROPOSED PLAN IN THE NEWSPAPER. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE LIKED THE IDEA OF APPLYING FOR A GRANT AND WOULD LIKE TO ENCOURAGE THE PARTICIPATION OF THE NORTH COUNTY GROUP IN THE SODDING AND LANDSCAPING, AND IN THOSE AREAS THAT THE COUNTY WOULD NEED ADDITIONAL HELP, HE FELT WE SHOULD DISCUSS THIS WITH THE NORTH COUNTY OFFICIALS AND PREPARE THE INFORMATION FOR DISTRIBUTION. COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT IT SHOULD BE NOTED ON THE - PLAN THAT WE WILL SECURE THE BATHROOM FACILITIES. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE PARKING SITUATION. SEP 191979 37 1 FACE5 SEP 191979 BooK 41 PmE 55� ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANI-MOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROCEEDING WITH THE GRANT APPLICATION, AND INSTRUCTED THE PLANNING STAFF TO MEET WITH SOME CONCERNED REPRESENTATIVES TO GO OVER THE PLANS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING AN EMERGENCY.ITEM TO -THE AGENDA CONCERNING THE FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TRANSMISSION LINE. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER EXPLAINED THAT THE COUNTY HAS A DEVELOPMENT -ORDER FOR TRANSMISSION LINES WITH FP&L, AND DISCUS- SION OF THE LOCATION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE COMING UP IN A FEW DAYS. HE CONTINUED THAT MR. SHANNON, OF TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, WILL BE ASKING FOR AN APPEAL OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ORDER. PLANNER REVER STATED THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WILL BE AFFECTED BY THIS PROPOSED NEW ALIGN- MENT HAVE BEEN CONTACTED BY FP&L, AND FP&L WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MEETING WITH THE BOARD, AND THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS, FOR -FURTHER DISCUSSION. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER THEN DISPLAYED THE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT TO THE BOARD. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL HAS COME UNDER A GREAT DEAL OF CRITICISM FROM THE GOVERNORS OFFICE AS THEY FEEL REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS ARE VERY NARROW IN THEIR VIEWS OF THESE THINGS, AND THAT SOMETHING SUCH AS THIS TRANSMISSION LINE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN A FEW GROVES, PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER COMMENTED THAT FP&L HAD ASSURED HIM THAT THEY WANT TO HAVE A HEARING WITH THE BOARD, AND THAT THEY HAVE SENT LETTERS TO THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS LAST WEEK. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER NEXT DISPLAYED A SIGN THAT WAS PREPARED FOR REZONING PURPOSES, AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IT WILL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY THAT IS TO BE REZONED IN ORDER TO TOUCH BASE WITH PEOPLE WHO CLAIM THEY DON T KNOW ABOUT THE REZONING. � � i HE CONTINUED THAT A $5 FEE WILL BE CHARGED WITH THE APPLICATION TO HANDLE THE COST OF THE SIGN; AND HE FELT IT IS A STEP FORWARD IN INFORMING THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF WHAT IS TRANSPIRING, WILLIAM KOOLAGE, OF 815 26TH AVENUE, SUGGESTED THAT SINCE THE AVERAGE PERSON DOESNIT KNOW WHERE THE GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION IS WHEN READING A LEGAL NOTICE, THE ADDRESS SHOULD ALSO BE PUB— LISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER. THE HOUR OF 10:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT: VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J, Schumann, Jr, who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a in the matter of in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore -been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper/. !!jj ((gy�pp. q Sworn to and subscribed before me this _day of� A.D. - 9 T-- — (SEAL) L „ ,¢usiness Manager) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, lgcliayh River County, Florida) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the County Commission of Indian River County will hold a public hearing on September 19, 1979 at 10:00 a.m. in the Commission Chambers of the In,' than River County Courthouse at 2121 14tk Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida, for the purpose of: - (1) Informing the citizens of the County's intent to file a Preapplication for funding under the Small Cities Program of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and 1978 as amended. (2) Explaining the program,, approximate funding level, program requirements, and the timing and approval procedures relating to the Preapplication; (3) Obtaining the views of the citizenry regarding community needs and priorities and receiving public input on how the funds may be i spent; (4) Explanation of how proposed activities will benefit low and moderate income families, prevent and eliminate slums and plight, upgrade the neighborhood environment or improve community services and facilities; and (5) Briefly discussing the accomplishments of past efforts funded with CDBG funds as j contained in the status report which will ac- i company the Preapplication to be submitted to the Department of- Housing and Urban Development (DHUD) by October 15, 1979. Citizens will have an adequate opportunity to articipate in the development of any ' evisions, changes, or amendments for ex- - enditure of Community Development funds at t is public hearing. Board of County Commissioners Sof Indian River County, Florida By: William C. Wodtke Jr., Chairman 1, pt. 12, 1979. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -DIRECTOR REGAN DISTRIBUTED THE FOLLOWING MATERIAL TO THE --BOARD CONCERNING THE 1980 GRANT PRE - APPLICATION: - BOOK 9. eACE55 SEP x.91979 39 SEP 191979 BOOK 41 PACE 554 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman WILLIARD W. SIEBERT, JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Bo Crd of Coun Commissioners FROM: Edwar J. n Community D elopment Director DATE: September 19, 1979 RE: Public Hearing for 1980 Community Development Block Grant Pre -Application (First Public Hearing) In accordance with the Community Development Act of 1974 and 1978, as amended and the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations, we are opening this first Public Hearing so that the citizens of Indian River County will have an adequate opportunity to participate in the development .of any revisions, changes, or amendments to the proposed 1980 Community Development Block Grant Pre -Application. The proposed 1980 Pre -Application is for a Comprehensive Project to be called the "Southeast Gifford Project". It is to be generally bounded by U.S. Highway One (U.S.#1) on the west, 39th Street on the north, 17th Avenue on the east and 37th Street on the south, located in Gifford, Florida. Rehabilitation $750,000 Streets 45,000 Right -of -Way Acquisition '70,000 Park and Playground 15,000 Water Service 30,000 Relocation Assistance 150,000 Administration 138,000 Planning 27,000 Contingencies 60,000 $1,285,000 Board of County Commissioners Page 2 September 19, 1979 The total project is phased over a three year period with the individual projects estimated as follows: 1980 Project $ 357,000 1981 Project 436,000 1982 Project 492,000 ' $1;285,000 Attached to this memorandum are copies of the Proposed Programs and Budget, Application Summary, and the Statement for Public Information. The Statement for Public Information is being made available for participants at the meeting. Once the second public hearing is concluded, the Community Development and Planning staffs respectfully request approval of the Commission to proceed to develop the concepts, refine the budget, and complete the pre -application for the project presented. The completed pre -application is to be presented to the County Commission on October 10, 1979 for its approval. At that time we will need a resolution authorizing the Chairman of the Board to sign and submit the 1980 Community Development Block Grant Pre -application to the Department of Housing and Urban Development office by October 15, 1979. k EJR:mw Enclosures SEP 191979 MOO 41 FACE 555 F",- 1 SEP 191979 nor 41 FAcE 556 PROPOSED PROGRAMS AND BUDGET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - GRANTS 1980 1982 SOUTHEAST GIFFORD PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION NO. TITLE PROPOSED BUDGET 1. Rehabilitation: Program will provide funds for improvement of 87 dwellings including such activities as rewiring, improving plumbing, septic tank repair or replacement, roofing and general upgrading of the unit. $750,000 2. Streets: Project will improve and pave approximately 3,000' of streets. 45,000. 3. Right -of -Way Acquisition: In order to improve and pave 17th Ave. additional right-of-way of 25' will be needed to provide a 60' right-of- way for that street. Acquisition of this property would include the purchase of an existing home in need of minor rehabilitation. 70,000 4. Park and Playground: 18th Avenue which has not been opened between 38th Lane and 37th Avenue provides nearly 1 acre of ground suitable for improvement as a linear park and playground area. 15,000 5: Water Service: As part of the improvement of the Gifford system, water service will be provided in the southeast area. Project will include assistance in providing service lines to individual dwellings. 30,000 6. Relocation Assistance: The scope.of this project will require the permanent relocation of approximately 25 families. The remainder of this assistance will support families which need to be relocated temporarily while repairs are being made -to their dwelling. 150,000 7. Administration: This includes all management and operating cost for the project and is less than 10..73% of the total project cost. 138,000 8. Planning: This item includes program and application preparation for the projects and constitutes 2.1% -of the total budget. 27,000 9. Contingencies: This is to cover unanticipated inflation or other increased project costs and .may be used for local discretionary activities in the project area. 60,000 $1,285,000 Proposed Programs and Budget Community Development Block Grant - Grants 1980 - 1982 Southeast Gifford Project Page 2 The total project is phased over a three year period with the individual projects estimated as follows: 1980 Project $ 357,000 1981 Project 436,000 1982 Project 492,000 $1,285,000 Itis proposed that the first year amounts reflect a period of "gearing -up" for the program and illustrating the County has developed -capability for administering a project of this magnitude. DR:mw 9/19/79 V SEP 191979 800K 41 FAGS 557 SEP 19 1979 Boor. 41 Fac. 558 1980 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY A major intent of the Community Development Program is to meet the statutory objective of providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income. In developing the 1980 Community Development Block Grant Application, the following major needs were found to exist: I. The need to eliminate blighting influences in deteriorating neighborhoods, especially those influences detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare of low to moderate.income persons. II. The need to conserve and maintain Indian River County's present housing stock, especially those units occupied by low to moderate income persons. The long term objectives of the Community Development Program in relation to the needs are: (A) To upgrade deteriorating neighborhoods to decent, safe, and environmentally sound living areas; eliminating those influences that are detrimental to the health, safety, and public welfare of low to moderate income residents as first priority. (Related to I) (B) To actively preserve housing through the initiation of a multitude of programs which will aid and assist in the maintenance and conservation of housing for low to moderate income families. (Related to II) Short term objectives which will assist in accomplishing the stated long term objectives are: (1) The establishment of a Public Facilities Program to eliminate deficiencies in this area, i.e., street paving, water and sewer, sidewalks, drainage, etc. (Related to (A)). (2) The establishment of a Housing Demolition Program to eliminate unsafe, dilapidated structures that blight the community. (Related to (A) and (B) ). (3) The -establishment of a Housing Rehabilitation Program to return structurally sound substandard units to standard condition and prevent further deterioration. Activities presented in the Fiscal Year 1980 Community Development Block Grant Pre -application which support the short term objectives are: (a) Establishment of public facilities program to eliminate deficiencies in this area. 1. Streets and associated drainage 2. Park and playground 3. Water service (b) Housing rehabilitation to return 87 structurally sound substandard units to standard condition. (c) Code enforcement to prevent further deterioration. Relocation assistance to families wishing to move from dilapidated structure into standard housing. Eliminating unoccupied dilapidated structures and assis't.in their demolition. SEP 19 1979 BOOK 41 rnu 559 SEP 19 1979 BOOK 41 PAGE 560 7 STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION The County Commission of the County of Indian River has authorized the preparation of applications for Fiscal Year 1980 funding under the Community Development Act of 1974 and 1978, as amended. This is the first public hearing to be held prior to submission of the pre -application to HUD on October 15, 1979, to obtain citizen opinion and input regarding the community development needs, their priorities and allocation of future funding to address these needs. The Indian River Board of County Commissioners must approve and authorize the submission of the pre -application to HUD. The County has received approval for a total of $653,000 of CDBG funds for the past three program years. This application will cover a 3 year funding cycle with Small Cities funds, Fiscal Year 1980 amounting to $357,000, 1981 in the amount of $436,000 and 1982 in the amount of $492,000 for a three year total of $1,285,000. Depending upon forthcoming regulations or administrative decisions at the HUD level, the amount of funds applied for may vary from those presently anticipated. Applications under the Small Cities Program are competitive with other communities throughout the State and it is certain that more pre -applications for funding will be submitted than can be funded. Submission of a pre -application for these funds is no guarantee that the County's program will be funded. Further, approval of the application notwithstanding, subsequent funding is dependent upon satisfactory performance. If the County's pre -application rates favorably compared to other applicants, HUD will invite the County to submit a full application for Small Cities Program Funds. Activities eligible to be conducted under a Community Development Program include but are not specifically limited to the following range of activities: 1. Acquisition 2. Neighborhood Facilities 3. Public Facilities & Improvements, such as solid waste disposal, fire equipment, public utilities improvement; street paving, lighting and drainage; with certain restrictions 4. Provision of Public Services 5. Interim assistance, including emergency housing repair 6. Removal of architectural barriers to the elderly and handicapped 7. Housing Rehabilitation � ® r 8. Code Enforcement 9. Economic Development Activities 10. Planning and Program Administration 11. Historic Preservation 12. Various types of housing assistance During the past three program years, the County has undertaken or programmed the following types of activities with CDBG funds; public improvements such as street paving and drainage; recreation improve- ments, housing rehabilitation. These CD applications are developed by the CD and Planning Staffs reflecting regular meetings with the Citizens Advisory Committee, correspondence with other agencies, civic groups and individuals, etc., on a continuing basis throughout the program year, in addition to the two public hearings for citizen information and input. The Citizens Advisory Committee recommends the program activities based upon citizen input and staff recommendations, with final approval the responsibility of the County Commission. The pre -application for Small Cities funds will be sent to HUD by October -15, 1979. In accordance with HUD requirements, a status report is being prepared. This report describes the progress of the CD program through October, 1979, will be included as part of the pre -application, and will be available for public inspection in the Community Development Departmdnt at 2121 - 14th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. In addition, the Department will be up -dating its Citizen Participation Plan in accordance with the new regulations. M ROOK 41 PAGE 56 SEP 19 1979 SEP 191979 BooK 41 PnE 562 COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MET AND FORMALLY VOTED TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION FOR THE SOUTHEAST GIFFORD PROJECT. HE COMMENTED THAT HUD STATED IF WE HAVE A MAJOR REHABILITATION ON SOME OF THESE HOUSES, THERE WILL BE A TIME WHEN THEY WILL NOT BE OCCUPIED, AND WE HAVE IN- SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO TAKE CARE OF THE FAMILIES FOR THE TIMES THE HOUSES WILL NOT BE OCCUPIED. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN STATED THAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING TODAY IS FOR THE PUBLIC TO SUPPLY INPUT; AND THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD AT 5:15 O'CLOCK P.M. TODAY. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHED TO SPEAK. THERE WERE NONE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NEXT DISCUSSED THE ANNUAL BIDS, AS PER THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 1979: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman WILLIARD W. SIEBERT, JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS ,TACK G JENNINGS. Administrator 2145 14th Avenue September 14, 1979 To: Board of County Commissioners From: Chairman, Bid Committee Subj: Bid Opening and Recording Vero Beach. Florida 32960 1. A public meeting was held at 2:00 Pm., on September 11, 1979 in room 115 located at 2145 14th Ave., Vero Beach, Fla., for the below listed Bids. This opening and recording was so advertised on August 31, 1979 in the Vero Beach Press Journal. Bid # 19 Elevator Maintenance Service Bid # 20 Traffic and Street Signs Bid # 21 Type 11 Asphalt Bid # 22 Southern Pine Lumber and Piling Bid # 23 Asphalt Coated and Alluminum Pipe Btd # 24 Ready Mix Concrete Bid # 25 Road Rock Bid # 26 Soil and Limerock Base Bid # 27 CL2 Chlorine Bid # 28 Rock Salt Bid # 29 Daybeacon Markers 2.- A Public Meeting was held at 10:00 AM on September 13, 1979 in room -115 located at 2145 14th Ave., Vero Beach, Florida for the below listed bid.This bid was originally scheduled for opening on July 26, 1979 and was so advertised on July 9, 1979 in the Vero Beach Press Journal. We had difficulities in pre- paring adequate specifications and measurements, therefore this bid was re- s-hoduled at 10:00 on Sept.embcr 13, 1979 and was as advertised on AugusL 31, 1979 in the Vera Beach Press Journal. Bid # 12 Striping and Marking of Indian River County Roads 3. The following recommendations are submitted: Bid 4,* 12, recommend this bid be awarded to thr ov:�rall low bidder (Pave -Mark Corp, Miami, Fla., in the aim-)unt of $ 29,804.20). Bid # 19, recommend this bid be awarded to the low bidder (Otis Elrvnr, r West Palm Beach, Fla. in tho amount of $ 334.31 her month) SEP 19191 41 PnE 563 SEP 191979 pooK 41 PAGE 564 Bid # 20, Recommend that items # 1(a), 1 (c), 2 (d), 3 (a), and 5 (a) be awarded to ;-he low bidder (Municipal Sign Co., Naples, Fla.) and that item, ,E 1 (b), 2 (a), 2 (b), 2 (c), 4 (a), 4 (b), 4 (c) and 4 (d) be awarded to the low bidder ( Mc Cain Sales, Inc., Ft. Pierce, Fla.) Bid # 21, recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder (Dickerson Inc. Stuart, Fla.) Bid # 22, Recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder (Koppers Co., Gaine,;ville, Fla.,) Bid # 23, Recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder (Southern Culvert Co., Ft. Pierce, Fla.) Bid # 24, Recommend this bid be awardeu to the only bidder (Rinker Co., Vero Beach, Fla.) Bid # 25, Recommend this bid be awarded to the only bidder (S & R Transport Irc., Lake Wales, Fla.,) Bid # 26, Recommend that items i & 3 be awarded to the low bidder (Pan American Engr., Vero Beach, Fla.) and that item # 2 be awarded to the low bidder (Dickerson In ., Stuart, Fla.) Bid # 27, Recommend that this bid be awarded to the low bidder (Vern Chemical Co., Vero Beach, Fla.) Bid # 28, Recommend that this bid be awarded to the only bidder (Tampa Salt Co. Tampa, Fla.) Bid # 29, Recommend that this bid be awarded to th% low bidder (A. Grover Fletcher Co., Roseland, Fla.) .._ l . NE A. NELSON Chairman ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR TO ACCEPT BID NOS. 19 THROUGH 28. BID 29 WAS DEALT WITH EARLIER IN THE MEETING. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NEXT DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD A REQUEST FROM THE PEBBLE BAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO PURCHASE AND ERECT DESCRIPTIVE STREET SIGNS IN PEBBLE BAY SUB- DIVISION. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE STIPULATION THAT REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SIGNS WOULD BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PEBBLE BAY. CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THEY CAN HAVE WHATEVER NAME THEY DESIRE, BUT ALSO MUST HAVE THE STREET NUMBER ON THE SIGN AS EMERGENCY SERVICES, SUCH AS THE POST OFFICE AND AMBULANCE SQUADS, MUST HAVE THE STREET NUMBERS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ABOVE REQUEST FROM PEBBLE BAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO PURCHASE AND ERECT DESCRIPTIVE STREET SIGNS, PROVIDED THE STREET NUMBERS ARE INCLUDED ON THE FACE OF THE SIGN, AND MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT OF THE SIGNS BECOME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PEBBLE BAY. THE BOARD THEN ADJOURNED AT 12:00 O'CLOCK P.M. AND RECONVENED AT 3:30 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT. RALPH ENG, OF BEINDORF & ASSOCIATES, REPORTED ON THE GIFFORD SEWAGE PROJECT BIDS, AND STATED THAT THE ELEVATOR STORAGE TANK IS BEING PAINTED. IT IS COVERED UNDER WARRANTY AND SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN TWO WEEKS, HE CONTINUED THAT WIDELL & ASSOCIATES WILL REPAIR THE CAP UNDER WARRANTY; THE WATER LINE EXTENSION WORK IS GOING WELL; AND THE CLEMMAN SCHOOL WATER LINE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CHLORINATION, SHOULD BE READY FOR HOOK-UP BY NEXT WEEK. MR. ENG NOTED THAT CHANGE ORDERS AND SKETCHES HAVE BEEN ,PREPARED FOR THE WATER LINES. HE SAID THAT TWO BIDS WERE RECEIVED _ ON SEPTEMBER 5TH, THE LOW BIDDER BEING, DRIVEWAY, INC., WHO WILL - SUB OUT SOME OF THE WORK. MR._.ENG REPORTED THAT THEIR EVALUATION SEP 19 1979 51 Book 4 565 _SEP 19 1979 _ _ ou 41 FA F 566 OF THE TOTAL PROJECT COST IS $1,800,000 WITH $212,000 IN CONTIN- GENCIES FOR OTHER WORK, HE NEXT DISCUSSED THE EASEMENTS ALONG THE FORCE MAIN ROUTE. THEY HAVE OBTAINED TWO OF THE SEVEN EASE- MENTS REQUIRED - THE OTHER EASEMENTS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE WORK ON THE PROJECT CAN P-ROCEED. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE EASEMENTS -HAD BEEN PREPARED AND SENT TO THE SEVEN PROPERTY OWNERS BUT HE COULDNIT GUARANTEE THAT THEY WOULD SIGN THEM; THE COUNTY MAY HAVE TO CONDEMN THE PROPERTY. MR.*ENG SAID THAT DER PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FOR SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND THIS IS NOW BEING PREPARED AND SHOULD BE READY IN 14 DAYS. HE RECOMMENDED THAT THE BIDS BE AWARDED TO DRIVEWAY, INC. WHEN ALL NECESSARY PAPERS; ARE RECEIVED; THE BID -FROM DRIVEWAY, INC. IS GOOD FOR 60 DAYS. CHAIRMAN WODTKE INSTRUCTED THAT THIS BE SCHEDULED.ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT MEETING AND IN THE MEANTIME, WE WILL TRY TO SECURE THE NECESSARY EASEMENTS WITH THE HELP OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. MR. ENG NOTED THAT THE NEXT STEP IS TO HAVE A PRECON- STRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH FMHA AND GO THROUGH THE EXERCISE OF CLOSING THE LOAN DiSCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING WHETHER THERE WOULD BE A MALODOROUS PROBLEM WITH THE TREATED WATER OR SLUDGE. MR. BEINDORF COMMENTED THAT THE DER WOULD HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING IF THERE WERE AN OBJECTION TO ANY POLLUTION PROBLEM. CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD WILL PARTIC- IPATE IN THE FUNDING OF THE CLEMANN SCHOOL EXTENSION COST OF $17,000. MR. ENG NEXT DISCUSSED REPLACING THE WATER LINE IN PINE VIEW PARK. HE RECOMMENDED THE COUNTY DELAY THAT WORK NOW AND ADD IT TO DRIVEWAY, INC. THROUGH CHANGE ORDERS, HE CONCLUDED THAT THE PROJECT IS IN GOOD STANDING AND THEY HAVE $212,000 PLUS WITH WHICH TO WORK. JOHN ROBBINS APPROACHED THE BOARD CONCERNING THE SOUTH BEACH WATER PROGRAM AND STATED THAT THE COUNTY HAD ASKED THEM TO ANALYZE TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS FOR EXTENDING WATER SERVICE SOUTH OF THE MOORINGS. HE CONTINUED THAT PLAN A WOULD BE TO SERVICE WATER TO 27 CONNECTIONS; PLAN B WOULD BE TO DETERMINE WHAT WOULD BE REQUIRED AS FAR AS SERVING THE ENTIRE AREA, AND TO INCLUDE WHAT ECONOMIC IMPACT THE FIRE PROTECTION WOULD HAVE, HIS ANALYSIS FOR PLAN A WAS TO USE 150 GPD PER PERSON, AND FOR PLAN B, AFTER TALKING TO ELLIOT GROSH OF THE CITY, AND USING 7100' EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE, WOULD BE 255 GPD PER PERSON, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES, MR. ROBBINS COMMENTED THAT IN PLAN A TO SERVE THE 27 RESIDENCES, THE COST WOULD BE $33,500 WHICH WOULD INCLUDE 2-1/2" PVC LINE WITH SPECIFICATIONS COMPARABLE TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, WITH FLUSH HYDRANTS AT THE END OF THE LINE. IN PLAN B, TO SERVICE THE ENTIRE BEACH AREA, AND BECAUSE OF THE AVAILABLE PRESSURE CONSTRAINTS, THEY HAD TO GO BACK TO THE MOORINGS ELEVATED WATER TOWER, AND THE LINE WOULD BE 14,000' OF 12" DUCT IRON. HE CON- TINUED THAT IN LOOKING AT FURNISHING FIRE PROTECTION, IT WOULD COST $406,950, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE FIRE HYDRANTS EVERY 800` USING MATERIALS COMPARABLE TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH WITH ADEQUATE FLUSHING DEVICES; THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE THE METERS OR LEGAL FEES, ETC. HEPBURN WALKER, OF ST. CHRISTOPHER BEACH, FELT THAT PLAN A WOULD NOT WORK AS THE COST WOULD BE TOO MUCH. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE IS A PROBLEM AS MR, SILVERMAN HAS A COMPETITIVE SYSTEM LOCATED IN SEMINOLE SHORES. MR, WALKER COMMENTED THAT IF THE OTHER FRANCHISE COULD BE CURTAILED, 20 TO 25 PEOPLE WOULD PAY FOR PLAN A; BUT ONLY 15 TO 20 PEOPLE WOULD PAY IF MR. SILVERMAN PROCEEDS WITH HIS FRANCHISE. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED -IF THERE ARE TAPS ALLOCATED THROUGH THE MOORINGS IF PLAN A IS USED. - ATTORNEY COLLINS SAID HE DID NOT KNOW IF THE SITUATION HAS CHANGED WITH THE CITY. THEY DID APPROVE ALLOCATION OF THE 27 TAPS IN THE AREA SOUTH -OF THE MOORINGS AND HE HAS HEARD NOTHING SEP 191979 53 Boa 41 PA -UE 567 SEP 191979 BOOK 41 mu 568 TO THE CONTRARY ATTORNEY COLLINS CONTINUED THAT IF THE BOARD GIVES THE DIRECTION, THEY CAN GO TO THE RESIDENTS FOR A VOLUNTARY FUNDING PROGRAM. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE SIZES OF LINE THAT COULD BE USED, AND WHETHER OR NOT THE COUNTY SHOULD CONSIDER ENLARGING THAT LINE AT THIS TIME TO EXTEND PAST THE SCHMUCKER HOME AND DOWN TO ROUND ISLAND PARK. MR. ENG STATED THAT $130,000 TO $150,000 WOULD BE THE DIFFERENCE IN COST BY GOING FROM A 2-1/2' PVC PIPE TO A 12" IRON PIPE. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED HE WOULDN'T HAVE ANY OBJECTION FOR THE COUNTY GOING TO ROUND ISLAND PARK WITH THE LINE. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT MUCH OF THE ENGINEERING HAS ALREADY BEEN PAID FOR - THE POLICY WE FORMULATED IS TO GET THE COST DOWN, AND EACH OF THE RESIDENTS WILL HAVE THE RESPONSI- BILITY OF GETTING IT TO THEIR HOMES. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT WE OUGHT TO STAY WITH THE ORIGINAL PLAN AND GIVE SERVICE TO THE PEOPLE THAT WANT IT. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT HOW THE COMPETITIVE SYSTEM OF MR. SILVERMAN`S MIGHT EFFECT THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS WHO TAKE PART IN THE FUNDING. ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT THIS IS A SET OF CIRCUMSTANCES THAT HAS EXISTED, AND HE DIDNIT ENTERTAIN REVOKING THE FRANCHISE. HE AGREED WITH THE CONTENTION THAT MR, SILVERMAN IS IN DEFAULT, BUT IT IS A NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE. THE ATTORNEY SUGGESTED THAT IF WE RUN INTO ROAD BLOCKS, WE COULD COME BACK TO THE BOARD, BUT FELT AN AFFIRMATIVE APPROACH SHOULD BE TAKEN RIGHT NOW, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT PHASING THE WORK AND GETTING COMMITMENTS FROM THE RESIDENTS FOR THEIR SHARE, BUT ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THERE WOULD BE PROBLEMS IN TRYING TO COLLECT. COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT THE TIME TO PAY FOR THE WATER IS WHEN THE RESIDENTS DO NOT HAVE WATER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED PLAN A TO SERVE WATER TO THE 27 CONNECTIONS, AS RECOMMENDED BY BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES; AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE ATTORNEY AND THE ADMINIS- TRATOR WORK ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS AND BRING BACK THEIR FINDINGS TO THE BOARD. JOHN ROBBINS, OF BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, DISCUSSED THEIR REPORT ON THE RENOVATION OF THE PEBBLE BAY WASTEWATER TREAT- MENT PLANT, WHICH REPORT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK. MR. ROBBINS REVIEWED THE ANALYSIS WITH THE BOARD AND STATED THAT HE WOULD WORK WITH THE COUNTY PERSONNEL TO KEEP THEM WITHIN THE GUIDELINES. HE STATED THAT IF THE COUNTY IS GOING TO KEEP THE PLANT, HE WOULD RECOMMEND THE SURGE TANK BE INSTALLED; IF NOT, A FLOW METER BE USED INSTEAD - IT WOULD ALL DEPEND ON WHAT THE COUNTY DECIDES TO DO. COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT HE AND ATTORNEY COLLINS HAD STARTED NEGOTIATIONS ON THIS MATTER AND PLAN TO RESUME NEGO- TIATIONS FOR TAKING THIS PLANT OUT OF EXISTENCE. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS ONE COMPLICATING FACTOR - THE LETTER FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DATED SEPTEMBER 12TH, WHICH GIVES THE COUNTY 15 DAYS IN WHICH TO RESPOND ABOUT WHAT THE COUNTY INTENDS TO DO WITH THE PLANT. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DECIDED THE COUNTY SHOULD DO WHATEVER WOULD TAKE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF MONEY TO CORRECT THE SITUATION, AND WORK ON TAKING THE PLANT OUT OF BUSINESS. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED THAT HE AND ATTORNEY COLLINS CAN DRAFT A LETTER TO THE DER OF THE COUNTY'S INTENTIONS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADDING AN EMERGENCY - ITEM TO THE AGENDA CONCERNING THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER PLANT. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ADVISED THE BOARD THAT THE COUNTY RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE DER ASKING WHAT ACTION THE 1 PAGE 569 SEP 191979 55 SEP 191979 41 PAGE 570. COUNTY PLANS TO TAKE ON THE SOUTH..000NTY WATER PLANT. HE THEN REFERRED TO THE NUMEROUS PROBLEMS THERE, SUCH AS LACK OF WATER - THE VERY POOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM - AND THE WATER TREATMENT _. SYSTEM WHICH IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH #1722 OF THE FLORIDA CODE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS AGREED THAT WE NEED TO BUILD A WATER PLANT IN THE SOUTH COUNTY. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT WE SHOULD ANSWER DER'S LETTER AND ADVISE THEM OF,THE COUNTY'S INTENTIONS. THE BOARD DISCUSSED NEXT A REQUEST FROM CRAIG D. ARNOLD, PRESIDENT OF THE AERODROME SUBDIVISION PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, - TO PAVE 1/4 MILE SECTION OF ROAD, AS FOLLOWS; Dear Cmniissioners; tae the Board of Directors of the Indian River Aerodrome Property O�,mors Association, in behalf of the residents mid property owners, wish to present to vont for your review and consideration what we consider to be a special request. Vle are asking, you the Commissioners, to approve paving at county expense, a one quarter (4) mile section of road to Indian River County standards. This section of road is currentI.y used by the above mentioned property owners to gain access to their haws and property, and, is located along the Southern most portion of Tract 8 Section 23, Township 33S, Range 38E. Itis known as.Sth Street S/W or Rebel Road. In this folder, you will find appropriate maps to help you better visualize the location. During the past S years we have placed marl fill along the road and have tried to grade it (with limited success) to keep it in passable condition. Vk, have ourselves financed, and do miin- tain, over one and one half M) miles of paved private roadway with- in the Aerodron-e. Currently residing; at the Aerodrome are eighteen families who rely upon this roadway daily to compute to their businesses and jobs within Indian River County. We all appreciate a well developed subdivi- sion with the recreational area, large building; lots and open spaces as beinga wonderful place to live and raise our families while at the scone tim , not detracting from the aesthetic values of Indian River County in general. Indian River County property tax revenue from the Aerodrome property owners and residents exceeds eleven thousand (11,000) dollars annually at thi-s time. lie intend to remain, for the most part, as self- supporting as a subdivision can be. The amount of travel on this portion of roadway demands that it be constructed to the requirements and standards of the Indian River County Road and Bridge Department. Considering all factors, we ask you, the (7mriissicAlers, to kindly consider granting approval for paving this quarter mile section of road. Kind Regards, Ma g. Ar-nold- President Rmsell Pieper - Vice res cent taltt - Secretary Preasurer ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON EXPLAINED THAT ORIGINALLY THIS REQUEST CAME TO HIM IN AUGUST BUT SINCE IT WAS MISPLACED IN HIS OFFICE, THERE ARE NO AERIAL MAPS TO DISPLAY. HE CONTINUED THAT THIS REQUEST WAS RECONSTRUCTED AND SENT TO THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AND THEY RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNTY SHOULD NOT GET INVOLVED IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION FOR PRIVATE SUBDIVISIONS. CRAIG ARNOLD STATED THAT HE WAS AWARE OF A COOPERATIVE PAVING PROGRAM THAT THE COUNTY HAS BUT UNDERSTANDS THAT THEY CAN- NOT AVAIL THEMSELVES OF THE PROGRAM BECAUSE THEY HAVE A PRIVATE ROAD. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THEY CONSTRUCT A ROAD AND DEED IT OVER TO THE COUNTY AND THE COUNTY WILL THEN MAINTAIN IT. CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THERE IS A DRAINAGE CANAL WHOSE OWNERSHIP MUST BE DETERMINED. HE CONTINUED THAT IF IT IS DETERMINED THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT HAS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, JOHN AMOS OF THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT SHOULD BE CONTACTED TO SEE IF THERE IS ANY OBJECTION TO THE ROAD BEING PAVED. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER NOTED THAT HIS DEPARTMENT WOULD LOOK INTO THE BUSINESS OF PAVING WHILE THEY ARE INVESTIGATING THE OWNERSHIP OF THE DRAINAGE CANAL. - MR. ARNOLD INQUIRED ABOUT HAVING THE ROAD GRADED, AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT IF _IT IS.OWNED BY INDIAN RIVER FARMS DRAINAGE DISTRICT, THEY HAVE GRADERS AND MIGHT BE ABLE TO GRADE THE ROAD. SEP 191979 57 Sao 41 PAoE571 Fr- 'I SEP 191979 Boor 41 FACE 5'72 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING REPORT FOR HURRICANE DAVID DAMAGE ASSESSMENT: JACK G JEWN(IS administrator - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman WILLIARD W. SIEBERT, JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS 2145 141h Avenue M E M O R A N D U M TO-: Board of Pounty Commissioners -- FROM: Edward J..,Regati DATE: September 12, 1979 RE: Hurricane David Damage Assessment Vero Beach. Florida X' After Hurricane David, in cooperation with the Director of Civil Defense, Lee Nuzie, I worked with the joint federal and state damage evaluation teams to assess the damage. That survey resulted in an initial opinion in both the residential and business losses in Indian River County in the amount of $19,875,000. On September 7th the Civil Defense Director requested that an estimate be made of governmental activities relating to Hurricane David and the subsequent needs for recovery be made. He requested that I be the Chairman of the Damage Assessment Committee. That estimate indicated at least $4,520,000 needed in beach restoration and $4,129,000 in governmental services and activities. On September l2-th the Regional Supervisor for the Farm Horne Administration requested an estimate of citrus losses for Indian River County, At an emergency Board Meeting of the Board of County Commissioners September 12, 1979 Page 2 Agricultural Stabilization Conservation Service the previous day they had arrived at a current estimate of $7,1375,000. This totals $ b,399,000. These first estimates are based on broad brush surveys and the final cost of damages is undoubtedly higher. The figures do not include business interruption expense, which will be considerable. They do not include detailed analyzation of the damage to structures due to water --this cost will be substantial. They do not include the myriad of governmental losses and services yet to be determined. Nor do they include an engineer- ing study of beach restoration. The citrus figure of $7,875,000 is only the tip of the agricultural iceberg. Processing and marketing cost losses may well triple the original figure. Yet to be determined is the possibility of additional fruit dropping from the tree, damaged fruit and trees destroyed due to flooding. Hurricane David has done substantial damage to Indian River County and there is a high probability that five counties, including Indian River County, will be declared a disaster area. The final determination on this is under consideration at the time of the writing of this report. EJk:.uw BGGK 41 FACE 5 SEP 19 1979 59 73 PH 4- LLJ I i 1. 3T ATE 2,COUNT'f I+NGc\.r.Tr Ac. [cTE� I nd i an 3. Nv^e•fatl F1t�ri(ia Forn.ri 1 _ � - ,(r 6RIEo C.-3.; R+r T+ON eN0 CA TE Or C.,SASTCM.t, C I's (7netu),n.; Trn Arr) AC PES GRgr/+N° IN COLNTV AC•.t3 I t:ON4AL Y+t•LD OAMALCO fU ,., Fr:.) YIELDT- 1.0,S f)•.•rr rnf)� Loss (1>••!lPrl LIVESTOCK AND r•OULTI,V -- NU\+BG4 LOST NUMBCR LOSS STRA\�C-.i ,Dollar} s• Oranges i 22 600 i �ioxes. 100° m1 11 ionl { % S1 mi 11 iori°• ('1°t' 0 2,500 S250,000 a. Grapefruit 31,114 100%19 million -25% $6.75 mi 1 }'• Ter,, __ I -- _ p� ecte ty 7. Citrus 2 500 100500,000 5% — $125,000 --- '? rla;s -- -- -- I;: 1 i 13. Ynnhr}• 85Q - - ' ( S2,500 9. 14. 00irr /AR.A b'J+Lr•rNCS Nlr••/I.ER =J�J \, +,CP •+I ;•Ac•.:• 1e.3 07'tCN -A•AAGC- CR LOSSE3 .O -LAPS Ar:D EOU,c"L'4T DF'STNO•ED z1. •rl, t�T+.pt.+r•d 1 I 72. o: 1., (/r..1, p,r•n .rgy,l•'.., 4.rwrrkPl.l ,;n,.l. .r d j,rr.or,.r( j j•f..,vr.a.c;nn.J Li t in remork- 1a. at•,ts lr tlur..r. t + I AGENCY VwDCr, ung AFOCCTED l — 23. 1'mHA Loans r.+'•+SEti 17. Srrrl•T• 11cIt•l;l+�+ r, ANTIC.PATE. � 24. scsJTYPr "CIA, NLEOECI !•.•, ri.,u �tb tLn•l!. Pr•••lr+l � 13. 11,,rII:a•-!o' S t•: 1ui;.mr:Ir 'I � �- -- 75. RSCS 19. I I E>li+n.rtr-.1 +ti+.Lttt pr}nrrt;N r NOYCS F('11 Ovr.lyd 1 2S. CONCURRENCE ~ •+v•.+tl.— +4'•"C'�7 NO J•.,�•kN - e► _ ( No� Yes I -.� _- t.F('\,.+ t.•,+ I ! 27. Coceu:'e --ru— tarn i'ncrime 1. .,1 •rnr 1 C 70 -7 t 1 T t 7 Monetary values of citrus losses based on current prices. A.price rise associated with - lower supply will•likely occur which will offset ultimate loss. Loss figure for cattle based on vie ight loss of ca•lyes due to flooded. pastures. in MR. REGAN CONTINUED THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO UPDATE THE FIGURES AS THE LOSSES CONTINUE TO GROW, AND WONDERED HOW BIG THE LOSSES HAVE TO BE BEFORE AN AREA IS DECLARED A DISASTER. MR. REGAN THEN REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LETTER SENT TO GOVERNOR GRAHAM: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY. Vice Chairman WILLIARD W. SIEBERT, JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS JACK G. JENNINGS. Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 September 18, 1979 The Honorable Robert Graham Governor of Florida State Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Dear Governor Graham: RE: Hurricane David Damage Assessment Indian River County At the request of the Director of Civil Defense in Indian River County, Mr. Lee Nuzie, our staff worked diligently with the joint federal and state Damage Evaluation Teams to assess the damage caused by Hurricane David.. Newspaper reports indicate .that your offices forwarded_ an estimate based on these first estimates in the amount of $23,000,000.to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for presidential consideration. As we bring together first estimates -of more areas of loss they now total $52,149,000. This still isn't ou.r final estimate and it is my belief that it will be'considerably more as data becomes available. We are trying to cope with a substantial disaster in Indian River County. The source information for the current tabulated estimate -of Hurricane David losses, $52,149,000, is as follows: 1. Sept. 6th Joint federal, state and county Damage Evaluation Team first opinion of residential and business losses in Indian River County $19,875;000 nu 41 Fa,,E 5°75 The Honorable. Robert Graham September 18, 1979 Page 2 2. Sept. 7th Civil Defense Director's request for estimate of governmental activities relating to Hurricane David -and subsequent needs for recovery. Submitted by Chairman of Civil Defense Damage Assessment Committee. a. Beach Restoration to Avoid loss of- Pri-vate & Publ is Faci-lities b. Governmental Services and Activities 3. Sept. 11th Emergency Board Meeting of the Agricultural Stabilization Conservation Service estimate of Agricultural Grove Losses to -date (Subject to additional losses) Estimated processing and Marketing costs (Subject to additional losses) TOTAL BOOK 41 FADE 576 $ 4,520,000 $ 4,029,000 $ 7,875,000 $15,750,000 $52,149,000 These first estimates are based on broad brush surveys and the final.cost of damage is undoubtedly higher. The figures do'not include business interruption expense which will be considerable. They do not-i*nclude detailed analyzation of the damage to structures due to water --this cost will be substantial. They do not include the myriad of governmental losses and services yet to be determined. Nor do they include an engineering study and detailed estimate of beach restoration. The.citrus figure is only the tip of the agricultural iceberg. Yet to be determined is the possibility of additional fruit dropping from the trees., damaged fruit and trees destroyed due to flooding. Hurricane David has done substantial damage to Indian River County and there is a clear and current need for the County to be declared a disaster area. We respectfully request -that information submitted to the President of the United States be up -dated so that he may take appropriate action. Sincerely, William C. Wodtke, Jr.1 Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida cc: Senator Richard Stone Senator Lawton Chiles Congressman Skip Bafalis � � s ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON APPROACHED THE BOARD CONCERNING DELINQUENT UTILITY DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTS AND RECOMMENDED THAT THESE BE FORWARDED TO THE COLLECTION BUREAU FOR COLLECTION OF BAD DEBTS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS— SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE FINANCE OFFICER TO FORWARD ALL DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS TO A COLLECTION AGENCY FOR COLLECTION. THE BOARD NEXT CONSIDERED A REQUEST FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN FOR EXECUTION OF A LEASE, AS FOLLOWS: BOARD OF COUNTY COMAISSIONERS WILLIAM G. INODTKE, JR., Chairman =•i" �,. ALMA l EE E(iY. Vrre Gha+rmen WILLIARD W. SIEBERT, JR. R. DON DEESON �\ •lt``)�li® PATRICK B. LYONS' J•\l,h. i, JENNINGS. Admrnrsttator 2145 14th Avenuq M E M O R A N D U M TO: Board of County Commissioners rkOpi.: Edward J. Regan Veru bi;arch. Fir rnda 329 DATE:. September 12, 1979 RE: Approval for Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to Execute Lease with Victor Palisano kold Today office) Tne Board of County Commissioners at its meeting on _ September 5, 1979 unanimously aLFthorized the leasing of. space owned by Victor Palisano (old Today office) for, a period of one year with an option to until the old hospital is complete. In order to clarify the intent of thr• Board we r-espectfully request retroactive approval for the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute a one year lease_ to occupy Space #3 at 800 20th Place, Vero Beach, from September 15, 1979 to September 14, 1930, with the option to lease until the new Cou-nty Office Building is completed. 41 PA,-UE577 SEP 191979 63 SEP 19 1979 ROOD 4� F�c� � I 8 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN A ONE YEAR LEASE WITH VICTOR PALISANO WITH AN OPTION TO LEASE UNTIL THE NEW ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IS COMPLETED. THE HOUR OF 5:01 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: 1 1 VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BUDGET YEAR 1979-80 COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before• the under,igne,l authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, 1r. who on oath Estimates Receipts 6 Balances: says that he ,s Business Is1 anager of the Veru Beach Press-Juurnal, a weekly newpe spar published Federal Sources . at Vero Beach ht Intl,an River County, I`londa; that the attached copy of advertisement, being State Sources Local Sources Ad Valorem Taxes Subtotal a Uv' Less: 5% Per F.S. 129.01(2) (b) Net as Balance Forward 10-1-79 / in the matter of �i/_v ^ JL.t�.�{�yjV / Tdtat Estimated Receipts 6 Betances o - Appropriations: Legislative 6 Administrative in the Court, was pub- Taxation Jud lc lat �^J � �I// I Electiiira fished in said newspaper in the issues of _f�i �J/%9 Service Dept. 7- .� /�• y Building Operation 6 Maintenance Planning 6 Development Veterans Services Ponca Protection - Fire Control Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Correction (County Jail) Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore Bul ldIng 6 Zoning been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and hasbeen entered Other Protective as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida Road Construction 6 Maintenance for a period of me year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- Refuse Disposat- tisr•mcnt; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or Health Services co,porahon any ducnunt, rc!,ate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- water 6 Sewer tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Welfare Services Recreation Facilities Culture Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of __ A.D. Natural Resources , Operating Expenses ,. Debt Service Total Appropriattons 1 siness Manager) Reserve for Contingencies /1 Cash Forward Total Budget (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, India River County, Florida) Mit.age Denotes county -wide millage Levy A. General Fund Levy S. County Health Dept. Levy 't i p Sept. 12; 4,g, 16,1979. i i 7 NOTICE IS,HEREBY dIVEN that the following is a statement Summar l zIOg a budget tentatfYe)yadopted by the Board of ' 1 County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, showing receipts of said Board for the fiscal year 1979-80 budgeted by, said Board for spid fiscal yFar and showing the proposed expenditures by gatd Board Tar said fiscal year ending September 30, 1980 In words and figures as follows: GENERAL TRANS- POND 't NT N SERVICE FUND REVENUE SHARING CTY =WASTETER TERPRISE NO CTY WATER ENTERPRISE SD CTY WATER TAKING DISTRICT ROCKRIDGE STREET LIGN7ING DISTRICT LAURELWOOD STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 1559 1 E S BOND ISSUE TOTAL FUnD$ _ PERCENT OF TOTAL . $ 7,000 $ S $ 450.709 I $ $ I $ $ S $ $ S 457,709 3.44 124,981 1,337.6)9 155.569 559.900 50,500 66o,eoo 75.000 573,936 216,117 254,891 1,200 i 90 40 5.000 - '1"":4, 89 2,397,474 12.15 18.00 4 910 143 407,7592 278 1 280 48.693 4 70,753.. 9.,125 37-33 . 70.92 5,202, 2 1,3 .139 1,22 ,4,2 525,709 573,93 24, ,117 254,15g-1-11200 2,3 ( 118) 1.320 ( 66) 53,x96 ( 2,685) ( 393,614) ( 2,96)_ ( 260 tat) ( 69 4D7) ( 61,207) 9 2, 93 1,31 4,,t 2,921__3Y3_,_769_ 3.93 1 216.117 -25T'. -F9 25 91 a 1,200 2,250 1125 51,00 9,050,81_ 67.95 ,$2 t 894.295 852 805 415 000 t 030 034 15.000 540 886 57 148 4 265,708 32.04_ 3 ,7 $ 2,4, t S 7 1577,921 1,555, 3 5 3 93 21 11 29 94, t ,200 2 790 2 1 0 t06�T5 _13,3��2i9_ -�Oo-Do_ ) S 20,608 $ S $ $ $ $ $ $ 901,749 6,77 $ 881,141 $ S 813,067 813,067 585.E42 6.11 4.40 559,238 26,604 106,700 BO 106,700 46,49+3 .35 46,488 439,743 3.30 211,893 227, 850 4,14,2J1 3.04 197,963 206,238 27,764 .21 27.464 300 2,243,690 16.84 •2,190,955 52,335 450.758 3.39 450,758 4,2,80 .09 3,000 9,600 _. 244,918 1.84 243.133 1,785 _ 56.",1 .43 55,685 ) 1,025 2,240,369 1 1,834;945 405, 420 - 232,576 1.82 1.75 220,576 12,000 - 2ee,52e 2.17 288,528 + 46,057 216,117 254,891 517,065 3.88 1.28 f 164.937 169.937 523.E35 3.93 219.333 1 148,422 156,080 89.500 .67 89.500 ! 45.978 - ; 7.550 375.386 2,590 1,990 tz5 53,:28 380,091 .40 2.85 249.502 379 695 54,031 483_228 3.63 1, 3 ,=-,-U .37 . 97 $559.012,1'9515�I1.c63,196 19,85554000_ 7.95 194.150,00 ftEL$ 940 350 7:06 141 29 046 21 117 - 25 94, t 200 2,190 2,140 10 ,156 St3,3! ,it9 100.oq 7 2 171 5 7 3 73 93 _ 3.61800 A * ,67425 -- •--- - ---- .11443 B •JL A detailed copy of the proposed budget Is on file In the office Q9 of the Clerk of Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida. The said Board will meet In the County Commissioner is Roam, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida at 5:01 P.N. o'clock on Wednesday, .September 19,1979, for the purpose of hearing requests and sP� complaints from tho.publlc regarding said proposed budget. and adoption at said budget& millage.. By: -s Will l am C. Wodtke, Jr. Chairman Board of County Conrnlssloners Indian River County, Florida' _ LU C AII SEP 191979 1 FAcE580 COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THIS IS THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED BUDGET, AND MEETINGS WILL BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 24TH AND 27TH FOR THE MILLAGE AND BUDGETS OF SPECIAL SERVICE FUNDS. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE WERE SOME CHANGES MADE TO THE BUDGET SINCE THE PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 12TH, AND THE BOARD COULD NOW DISCUSS THEM. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON COMMENTED THAT THERE WAS NOT GOING TO BE ANY MILLAGE ASSESSED WHATSOEVER IN THE TRANSPORTATION FUND BUT NOW FELT IT WAS IN THE BEST INTEREST TO ASSESS A MINIMUM MILLAGE OF .0001, WHICH WOULD GENERATE $100. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED AMENDING THE BUDGET AS ADVERTISED, REFLECTING $100 FOR AD VALOREM -SOURCES ON TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, LESS 5% ESTIMATE, AND A MILLAGE OF .0001. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO BE HEARD. ANN ROBINSON, 3008 NASSAU DRIVE, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND THANKED THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, AND THE FINANCE OFFICER FOR THEIR TIME AND EFFORT SPENT IN PREPARING THE BUDGET, AND COMMENDED THEM FOR DOING A WONDERFUL JOB. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT THE COUNTY WAS FORTUNATE TO HAVE A CITIZEN SUCH AS MRS. ROBINSON - HER REMARKS WERE VERY REWARDING AND THE BOARD EXPRESSED THEIR APPRECIATION TO HER. LEN PIPER, DIRECTOR OF ALCO-HOPE, INQUIRED HOW THE BOARD ARRIVED AT THE $5,000 FIGURE BUDGET FOR THEIR ORGANIZATION. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY HAD ASKED FOR $15,000 AND THEY ARE GOING TO BE HARD-PRESSED THIS YEAR. CHAIRMAN WODTKE EXPLAINED THE FUNDS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE MENTAL HEALTH FUND, WITH THEIR CONCURRENCE, AND THE COUNTY WAS HOPEFUL THAT IN THE FUTURE THAT COMMUNITY EFFORT AND RESPONSE WOULD BACK THE ALCOHOL PROGRAM, CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT IF ALCO-HOPE DID HAVE SOME SERIOUS PROBLEMS, THE BOARD WOULD BE RECEPTIVE TO HEAR THEM DURING THE YEAR. DISCUSSION ENSUED REGARDING BURNING SITES FOR DEBRIS DUE TO HURRICANE DAVID AND IT WAS NOTED A PERMIT TO DO SO COULD BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF FORESTRY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS— SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO 5:01 O'CLOCK P.M. ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1979. THE HOUR OF 5:15 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT: VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being :1 n the matter of in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed beforepe this day of A.D._—�� (Business Manager) (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, I din River County, Florida) SEP 191979 67 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the County. Commission of Indian River County will hold a public hearing on September 19, 1979 at 5:15 p.m. in. the Commission Chambers of the In- dian River County Courthouse at 2121 14th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida, for the purpose of: (1) Informing the citizens of the county's intent to file a Preapplication for funding under the Small Cities Program of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and 1978 as amended. (2) Explaining the program, approximate funding level, program requirements, and the timing and approval procedures relating to the Preapplication; (3) Obtaining the views of the citizenry regarding community needs and priorities and receiving public input on how the funds may be spent; (4) Explanation of how proposed activities will benefit low and moderate income families, prevent and eliminate slums and plight, upgrade the neighborhood environment or improve community services and facilities; and (5), Briefly discussing the accomplishments, of past efforts funded with CDBG funds as contained in the status report which will ac -1 company the Preapplication to be submitted to! the Department of Housing and Urban Development (DHUD) by October 15,1979. Citizens will have an adequate opportunity to participate in the development of any revisions, changes, or amendments for ex- penditure of Community Development funds at this public hearing. Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida -s-William C. WodtkeJr., Chairman Sept. 12, 1979 800K 41 FACE 581 SEP 191979 BOOK 41 pmuE 5$2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN DISTRIBUTED MATERIAL TO THE BOARD PERTAINING TO THE 1980 GRANT PRE -APPLICATION. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED FOR A BREAKDOWN OF THE ADMINIS- TRATION COST OF $138,000. MR. REGAN-REPLIED THAT IT ACCOUNTS FOR THE DIRECTOR, SECRETARY, TELEPHONE, RENTAL SPACE, AND INCIDENTALS FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON INQUIRED IF THE COST OF THE AUDIT WOULD-BE PAID OUT OF THE ADMINISTRATION FUND, AND MR. REGAN- REPLIED THAT I -T WOULD BE APPLIED TO THE CONTINGENCY FUND. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT IN THE AUDIENCE WISHED TO SPEAK. THERE WERE NONE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED -BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT SOMEONE FROM THE HUD OFFICES BE CONTACTED IN JACKSONVILLE TO LOOK AT THE PRE -APPLICATION BEFORE IT IS FINALIZED.AND MR. REGAN STATED THAT HE WOULD TAKE CARE OF THE MATTER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ADD AN EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE AGENDA REGARDING ROOFING REQUIREMENTS. ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED HAVING THE BUILDING APPEALS COMMITTEE STUDY THE ROOFING REQUIREMENTS, UNDER THE SOUTHERN STANDARD BUILDING CODE TO MAKE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS, AS RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTY SUSTAINED CONSIDERABLE ROOF DAMAGE DURING HURRICANE DAVID. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED HAVING THE BUILDING APPEALS COMMITTEE STUDY THE ROOFING REQUIREMENTS IN THE SOUTHERN STANDARD BUILDING CODE, AND MAKE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADDING TWO EMERGENCY ITEMS TO THE AGENDA CONCERNING CULVERT WORK, AND DUMPING SITES. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT AS A RESULT OF HURRICANE DAVID, EMERGENCY CULVERT WORK ON WILLOW STREET NEEDS TO BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO CORRECT A SAFETY HAZARD. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED WITH THE EMERGENCY CULVERT INSTALLATION ON WILLOW ST. AT A COST OF $1,438 FOR 60' OF CULVERT, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING EXTENDING THE USE OF THE DUMPING SITES FOR DEBRIS CAUSED BY HURRICANE DAVID FOR TWO WEEKS; THE COUNTY HAS OBTAINED A PERMIT FROM DER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED EXTENDING THE DUMPING SITES IN THE COUNTY FOR TWO ADDITIONAL WEEKS AS SET OUT ABOVE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE AGENDA CONCERNING THE HIRING OF AN AUDITING FIRM. CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT AT THE LAST MEETING, DIS- CUSSION WAS HELD ABOUT THE SELECTION OF AN AUDITING FIRM AND ASKED FOR THE RECOMMENDATION FROM COMMISSIONER LOY AND FINANCE OFFICER BARTON. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON EXPLAINED THAT BOTH FIRMS WERE EQUALLY QUALIFIED, AND THEIR SELECTION WAS THE FIRM OF W. 0. DALEY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE OFFICER TO HIRE THE FIRM OF W. 0. DALEY, AND ALSO AUTHORIZED FINANCE OFFICER BARTON AND COMMISSIONER LOY TO NEGOTIATE THE CONTRACT WITH THE ATTORNEY. THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY., -HAVING BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND -FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY - FUND NOS. 63066-63184 INCLUSIVE, SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING SEP 191979 69 BOOK 41 FAu 583. SEP 191979 FOOK 41 %E584 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGIS- LATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION -MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:05 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: s CLERP CHAIRMAN