HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/11/2004
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MAY 11, 2004
1.CALL TO ORDER........................................................................................ 1
2.INVOCATION ............................................................................................... 1
3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE...................................................................... 1
4.ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS ............................................................................................................ 1
5.PROCLAMATION – DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF MAY
16-22, 2004 AS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK ............ 2
6.A.APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2004 ......... 2
6.B.APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MEETING OF APRIL 6, 2004 ............... 3
7.CONSENT AGENDA ................................................................................... 3
7.A.AW ...........................................................................................3
PPROVAL OF ARRANTS
7.B.2004ENMCCE
LECTION OF ATHAN COLLUM AS HAIRMAN OF LECTED
OOC(EOOC) ...........................................................3
FFICIALS VERSIGHT OMMITTEE
May 11, 2004 1
7.C.RKWPLA
ESIGNATION OF ATHRYN ILSON FROM THE UBLIC IBRARY DVISORY
B(PLAB) ...........................................................................................................3
OARD
7.D.TIRS–CAMPO,
OWN OF NDIAN IVER HORES OMMITTEE PPOINTMENTS TO
MPOTAC,MPOCAC,MPOBPAC,COPO,LAAC,PRC,TCCLG,AHAC,
BSPAB,TCRPC .................................................................................................4
AND
7.E.TO–CAAHAC,BSPAC,ESDAC,
OWN OF RCHID OMMITTEE PPOINTMENTS TO
MPO-BAC,MPO-TAC,NBICPTF,LAAC,MPO ...................................................4
7.F.CMS–TMC
HASE EADOWS UBDIVISION HIRD ODIFICATION TO ONTRACT FOR
CRI–CM,L.L.C. ...........5
ONSTRUCTION OF EQUIRED MPROVEMENTS HASE EADOWS
7.G.AB#6071–DF(4)CS–
WARD ID EMOLITION OF OUR ONDEMNED TRUCTURES
HF&S(BD) ........................................................6
ENRY ISCHER ONS UILDING IVISION
7.H.FCFBWL11,B14,V
LOODPLAIN UT AND ILL ALANCE AIVER FOR OT LOCK ERO
LE,U2,834694A–CC ............6
TH
AKE STATES NIT AT VENUE ROCKER ONSTRUCTION
7.I.FPAPRR--WK
INAL LAT PPROVAL FOR A RIVATE OAD IGHTOFAY TO BE NOWN AS
47AS.W.(25SS.W.)–RSM ....................7
THTH
VENUE TREET EQUESTED BY EAN INIX
7.J.HDSCDO(DO)
EARING ATE CHEDULED TO ONSIDER THE EVELOPMENT RDER
WV–DVDR
FOR THE ATERWAY ILLAGE IOSTA EVELOPMENT OF EGIONAL
I(DRI) .............................................................................................................7
MPACT
7.K.AB#6057–RCT(3)C-O
WARD ID OOF OATING FOR HREE OUNTYWNED AND
OF–SRS,I.-C
PERATED ACILITIES UPERIOR OOFING YSTEMS NC OUNTY
AA,S’B&G,JP
DMINISTRATION NNEX HERIFFS UILDING ARAGE AND AIL HASE
II&III ........................................................................................................................7
7.L.S–FTF–FMC’D
HERIFF ORFEITURE RUST UND LORIDA ISSING HILDRENS AY
C ...............................................................................................................8
EREMONIES
7.M.RN.2004-049-R--WA16/17
THTH
ESOLUTION O IGHTOFAY CQUISITION FOR THE
SRWPRLF
TREET OAD IDENING ROJECT AND EVISED OCALLY UNDED
A(LFA)FDT
GREEMENT WITH THE LORIDA EPARTMENT OF RANSPORTATION
(FDOT) .......................................................................................................................8
7.N.26SBRORLC(74
THTH
TREET RIDGE EPLACEMENT VER ANGE INE ANAL
A)–PN.0378/CON.2–S&S
VENUE ROJECT O HANGE RDER O HELTRA ON
CC,I. .................................................................................9
ONSTRUCTION OMPANY NC
May 11, 2004 2
7.O.PHSSAR
ROCLAMATION ONORING TEPHEN TRADLEY FOR TTAINING THE ANK OF
ES .............................................................................................................9
AGLE COUT
9.A.1.PUBLIC HEARING ON TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES (TIF) – A
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHAPTER 953, FAIR SHARE
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (LEGISLATIVE) ................................ 9
9.B.1.PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - BRIAN T. HEADY –
IMPOSITION OF IMPACT FEES ........................................................... 15
9.B.2.PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM – FRANK ZORC – REFERENDUM
NOVEMBER 2004 ON GROWTH DEVELOPMENT ISSUE ............. 16
9.C.1.PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM – PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 18, 2004
ON VERO CHRISTIAN CHURCH’S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL
EXCEPTION AND MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A
PLACE OF WORSHIP (QUASI-JUDICIAL) ........................................ 16
9.C.2.PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM – PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 1, 2004
ON J & E OSLO GROVE INVESTMENT’S REQUEST TO
TH
REZONE 10.67 ACRES LOCATED 630 FEET SOUTH OF 9
STREET S.W. (OSLO ROAD) AND APPROXIMATELY 620
FEET EAST OF 27TH AVENUE, FROM RS-6, SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) TO RM-6,
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE) (QUASI-JUDICIAL) ...................................................... 16
9.C.3.PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM – PUBLIC HEARING SET FOR JUNE 8,
2004 – PARKWOOD LAND INVESTMENT INC.’S REQUEST
May 11, 2004 3
TO REZONE 9.3 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST
THTH
CORNER OF 66 AVENUE AND 26 STREET, FROM A-1,
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES), TO
RM-6, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE) (QUASI-JUDICIAL) ....................................................... 17
9.C.4.PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM – PUBLIC HEARING SET FOR
AUGUST 17, 2004 TO CONSIDER THE DEVELOPMENT
ORDER (DO) FOR THE WATERWAY VILLAGE – DIVOSTA
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI) ............................. 17
TH
11.I.1.UTILITY EASEMENT AT 16 STREET BALL FIELD
REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH ................................ 17
11.I.2.EAST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MASTER STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN - VORTEX TREATMENT SYSTEMS AT
THE MAIN RELIEF CANAL, NORTH RELIEF CANAL, AND
SOUTH RELIEF CANAL IN THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS
WATER CONTROL DISTRICT – CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
- WORK ORDER NO. 5 FOR FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN ...... 18
11.J.1.SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION
(SCADA) SYSTEM UPGRADES - LIFT STATIONS,
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES AND
RECLAIMED WATER SITES – AUTHORIZATION TO
PROCEED WITH BIDDING .................................................................... 19
11.J.2.WALKER WOODS APARTMENTS OFF SITE FORCE MAIN
RD
ON 33 STREET (THE OAK CHASE AND THE SANCTUARY
THTH
SUBDIVISIONS) FROM 66 TO 58 AVENUES – PAYMENT
May 11, 2004 4
REQUEST NO. 17/FINAL – WALKER WOODS CLUB LTD.
(CORONADO DEVELOPMENT, INC.) ................................................. 19
11.J.3.UTILITY RELOCATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
MISCELLANEOUS PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS #0365, #0367, #0368, #0369, #0395,
AND #9922 – GEORGE E. FRENCH - WORK AUTHORIZATION
DIRECTIVE NO. 2001-085 ........................................................................ 20
13.ACHAIRMAN CAROLINE D. GINN ........................................................ 20
13.B.VICE CHAIRMAN ARTHUR R. NEUBERGER .................................. 20
13.C.COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS ..................................................... 21
13.D.COMMISSIONER THOMAS S. LOWTHER ........................................ 21
13.E.COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT ........................................... 21
14.A.EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT .................................................. 21
14.B.SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ................................................. 21
14.C.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD ............................................. 21
May 11, 2004 5
May 11, 2004
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in
th
Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25 Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, May 11, 2004, at 9:00 a.m. Present were Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman; Arthur R.
Neuberger, Vice Chairman; and Commissioners Fran B. Adams, Thomas S. Lowther, and Kenneth
R. Macht. Also present were Joseph Baird, County Administrator; William G. Collins II, County
Attorney; Kimberly Massung, Executive Aide to the Board; and Patricia Ridgely, Deputy Clerk.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Ginn called the meeting to order.
2. INVOCATION
Reverend Carol Trax, Community Church, delivered the Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Lowther led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY
ITEMS
Chairman Ginn requested the following changes to today’s Agenda:
May 11, 2004 1
thth
1.Add 7.N. 26 Street Bridge Replacement Over Range Line Canal (74
Avenue) – Project No. 0378/Change Order No. 2 – Sheltra & Son Construction
Company, Inc.
2.Add 7.O. Proclamation Honoring Stephen Stradley for Attaining the Rank of
Eagle Scout.
3.Defer 9.B.2. at the request of Mr. Frank Zorc.
4.Move 7.J. to 9.C.4.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Vice Chairman Neuberger, the Board unanimously made
the above changes to the Agenda.
5. PROCLAMATION – DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF MAY
16-22, 2004 AS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK
The Chairman presented this Proclamation to EMS Deputy Chief Cory Richter who
accepted with thanks of the department for the proclamation and the Commissioners’ continued
support.
6.A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MEETING OF MARCH 23, 2004
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of March 23, 2004. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lowther, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 23, 2004, as
written and distributed.
May 11, 2004 2
6.B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MEETING OF APRIL 6, 2004
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of April 6, 2004. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lowther, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 6, 2004, as
written and distributed.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
7.A. AW
PPROVAL OF ARRANTS
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved
the list of warrants issued by the Clerk to the Board for the
period April 23-29, 2004, as requested in the memorandum
dated April 29, 2004.
7.B. 2004ENMCC
LECTION OF ATHAN COLLUM AS HAIRMAN OF
EOOC(EOOC)
LECTED FFICIALS VERSIGHT OMMITTEE
The Board noted the election above for the record.
7.C. RKWPL
ESIGNATION OF ATHRYN ILSON FROM THE UBLIC IBRARY
AB(PLAB)
DVISORY OARD
May 11, 2004 3
The Board accepted the resignation of Kathryn Wilson with regret.
7.D. TIRS–CA
OWN OF NDIAN IVER HORES OMMITTEE PPOINTMENTS TO
MPO,MPOTAC,MPOCAC,MPOBPAC,COPO,LAAC,PRC,
TCCLG,AHAC,BSPAB,TCRPC
AND
The Board noted the following appointments:
Metropolitan Planning Organization David J. Becker
MPO Alternate John A. Klein
MPO Technical Advisory Committee Hugh A. Cox, Jr.
MPO Citizens Advisory Committee Robert G. Bowman
MPO Bike Path Advisory Committee Barbara Tilney
Council of Public Officials E. William Kenyon
Land Acquisition Advisory Committee John A. Klein
Parks & Recreation Committee William H. Ahrens
Treasure Coast Council of Local Governments Thomas W. Cadden
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Robert J. Bradshaw
Beaches & Shores Preservation Advisory Board William H. Ahrens
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (Alt.) William H. Ahrens
7.E. TO–CAAHAC,
OWN OF RCHID OMMITTEE PPOINTMENTS TO
BSPAC,ESDAC,MPO-BAC,MPO-TAC,NBICPTF,LAAC,
MPO
The Board noted the following appointments:
May 11, 2004 4
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee David Jakubiak
Beaches & Shores Preservation Advisory Committee David Jakubiak
Emergency Services District Advisory Committee David Jakubiak
MPO Bikepath Advisory Committee David Jakubiak
MPO Technical Advisory Committee David Jakubiak
North Barrier Island Corridor Plan Task Force David Jakubiak
Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Walter Sackville
Metropolitan Planning Organization Richard Dunlop
7.F. CMS–TM
HASE EADOWS UBDIVISION HIRD ODIFICATION TO
CCRI–
ONTRACT FOR ONSTRUCTION OF EQUIRED MPROVEMENTS
CM,L.L.C.
HASE EADOWS
Commissioner Macht separated this from the Consent Agenda. He stated that Mr.
Chase, the developer of this project and Oak Chase, has not been forthcoming in fulfilling his
contractual obligations on several items at Oak Chase and has avoided consultations with him and
Public Works Director James Davis. Although he was reluctant to approve this item, he would
because it was a technicality.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Lowther, the Board unanimously approved
the proposed Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement and
Third Modification to Contract for Construction of
Required Improvements No. SD-00-06-07-CFC
(93050013-26511) extending the completion date to May
14, 2005 and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended in the memorandum dated April 15, 2004.
May 11, 2004 5
COPIES OF DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.G. AB#6071–DF(4)C
WARD ID EMOLITION OF OUR ONDEMNED
S–HF&S(BD)
TRUCTURES ENRY ISCHER ONS UILDING IVISION
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#6071, in the amount of $21,459.50, to Henry Fischer &
Sons, Inc., as the second lowest most responsive and
responsible bidder who is duly licensed in Indian River
County, and meets the specifications as set forth in the
Invitation to Bid, as recommended in the memorandum
dated May 3, 2004. (All Phase Environmental, Inc., the
apparent low bidder, was unable to verify proper licensing.)
7.H. FCFBWL11,B
LOODPLAIN UT AND ILL ALANCE AIVER FOR OT LOCK
14,VLE,U2,834694A–C
TH
ERO AKE STATES NIT AT VENUE ROCKER
C
ONSTRUCTION
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously granted the
cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section
930.07(2)(d)4, as recommended in the memorandum dated
April 28, 2004.
May 11, 2004 6
7.I. FPAPRR--W
INAL LAT PPROVAL FOR A RIVATE OAD IGHTOFAY TO BE
K47AS.W.(25SS.W.)–R
THTH
NOWN AS VENUE TREET EQUESTED BY
SM
EAN INIX
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously granted final
plat approval for the private road right-of-way to be known
th
as 47 Avenue SW, as recommended in the memorandum
dated April 29, 2004.
7.J. HDSCD
EARING ATE CHEDULED TO ONSIDER THE EVELOPMENT
O(DO)WV–DV
RDER FOR THE ATERWAY ILLAGE IOSTA
DRI(DRI)
EVELOPMENT OF EGIONAL MPACT
MOVED TO 9.C.4.
7.K. AB#6057–RCT(3)
WARD ID OOF OATING FOR HREE
C-OOF–SR
OUNTYWNED AND PERATED ACILITIES UPERIOR OOFING
S,I.-CAA,S’
YSTEMS NC OUNTY DMINISTRATION NNEX HERIFFS
B&G,JPII&III
UILDING ARAGE AND AIL HASE
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#6057, in the amount of $30,000, to Superior Roofing
Systems, Inc., as the most responsive and responsible
bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the
May 11, 2004 7
Invitation to Bid, as recommended in the memorandum
dated May 4, 2004.
7.L. S–FTF–FM
HERIFF ORFEITURE RUST UND LORIDA ISSING
C’DC
HILDRENS AY EREMONIES
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved
use of $1,000 from the Sheriff’s Forfeiture Trust Fund for
the Missing Children’s Day ceremonies, as requested in the
letter of April 30, 2004.
7.M. RN.2004-049-R--WA
ESOLUTION O IGHTOFAY CQUISITION FOR
16/17SRWPR
THTH
THE TREET OAD IDENING ROJECT AND EVISED
LFA(LFA)F
OCALLY UNDED GREEMENT WITH THE LORIDA
DT(FDOT)
EPARTMENT OF RANSPORTATION
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to execute the Agreement; directed the
Community Development Director to transmit the LFA;
and adopted Resolution No. 2004-049 approving a locally
funded Agreement with the Florida Department of
Transportation to fund a portion of the local match for right
thth
of way acquisition associated with the 16/17 Street
widening project.
May 11, 2004 8
PARTIALLY EXECUTED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.N. 26SBRORLC
TH
TREET RIDGE EPLACEMENT VER ANGE INE ANAL
(74A)–PN.0378/CON.2–
TH
VENUE ROJECT O HANGE RDER O
S&SCC,I.
HELTRA ON ONSTRUCTION OMPANY NC
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board approved Change Order
No. 2 to the contract with Sheltra & Son Construction
Company, Inc., for an increase in contract cost of
$122,400.00, and an increase of 10 days in the time of the
contract, and directed the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended in the memorandum of May 7, 2004.
DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
7.O. PHSSA
ROCLAMATION ONORING TEPHEN TRADLEY FOR TTAINING
RES
THE ANK OF AGLE COUT
This proclamation has been entered for the record.
9.A.1. PUBLIC HEARING ON TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES (TIF) – A
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHAPTER 953, FAIR SHARE
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS (LEGISLATIVE)
May 11, 2004 9
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Community Development Director Bob Keating briefly reviewed the
memorandum dated May 5, 2004 provided in the backup. He recounted that the Board established
a countywide impact fee formula in 1986 when the fees for various land uses were set. The
formula has not changed since then, but the values in the formula changed in 1999. He mentioned
all of the County’s boards and committees that recommended approval of this LDR amendment.
Staff has also recommended adoption of the proposed ordinance with an effective date of June 1st
as well as a recommendation that the Board require the impact fees be updated every 3 years.
Bob Wallace
, Tindale-Oliver and Associates, Inc., 3660 McGuire Boulevard,
Orlando 32603, indicated his pleasure to have worked with staff as the County’s consultant. His
presentation included a discussion of the methodologies and assumptions used in the development
of the proposed TIF Ordinance. His PowerPoint presentation (copy in the backup in the office of
the Clerk to the Board) and comments consisted of the following: Overview of Presentation, Basic
Impact Fee Formula, Transportation Impact Fee Cost (single family home), Transportation Impact
Fee Credit (single family home), Net Transportation Impact Fee (single family home), Standards
Driven Impact Fee (including flexibility on spending the funds), Update of Fee Components,
Review of Credits, Update of Revenue Credits, Benefits of Increased Fees, Recommendations to
Date, Staff Recommendations, and Transportation Impact Fees for Selected Land Uses. He
specified that these TIFs are in line with those of other counties.
Questions, explanations, and discussion ensued regarding comparisons to impact
fees to those of nearby counties, residential versus business impact fees, square foot of
construction basis, the major increase of impact fees over the current TIFs, percentages of
increase, calculation of trip generation miles, trips to small shopping centers versus large ones,
concern of possible penalization of the small business owner, use of ITE (Institute of
Transportation Engineers) rates, FDOT credits, clarification on the method used in determining
May 11, 2004 10
the percentage increase, and a point-of-interest that there is no TIF for sand mines whose trucks are
tearing up the roads.
(Clerk’s Note: The Chairman called a recess at 10:04.
The meeting was reconvened at 10.13.)
The Chairman requested that speakers limit their remarks to 3 minutes, opened the
public hearing, and called on those who had signed up to speak regarding this matter.
Russell Flinchum
, 816 Gayfeather, thanked the Board for clarifying the
calculation used for the percentage increase. As a contractor for medical buildings, he pointed out
the unfairness of the increase in TIFs because doctors’ reimbursement rates from Medicare and
insurance companies are regulated and the doctors cannot pass on these additional costs for impact
fees to end users. He held that the proposed TIF increase will negatively affect land costs for
commercial development.
th
Randall Flinchum
, 2406 19 Avenue, explained his business of buying and
renovating homes and feared the proposed TIF increase will kill his business. A more gradual
increase would be more acceptable.
Duane Weise
, 8485 Seacrest Drive, questioned the factors used in this
recommendation. He asked that the Board delay their decision in order to make a more insightful
analysis because the rates for the other (proposed) impact fees are still unknown.
th
Eligha Pryor Jr.
, 4646 30 Avenue, a house-builder, asked that the effective date
st
be delayed until August or September, not June 1, because he has contracts to fulfill.
Vern Toulson
, 95 Cache Cay Drive, president of the Treasure Coast Builders’
Association, had concerns about the burden being placed on young families as the cost of the
average home is climbing and will soon approach $200,000. Everything is going up including
interest rates and material costs. Concrete and labor shortages impact new home prices also. He
asked them to explore other more broad-based funding sources.
May 11, 2004 11
Bob Swift
, 6450 Glendale Road, raised a “fundamental question” by asking if we
really know what this TIF will do. He considered it a “tax” and believed a 342% increase does not
pass the reasonability test. He encouraged a delay on a decision to allow time to check on both of
these concerns.
th
Greg Burke,
455 29 Court SW, believed that it is fair for development to pay for
itself, but this large percentage increase is most critical.
th
Tim Zorc
, 4415 5 Place SW, a local home-builder and a director of Treasure
Coast Builders' Association, felt the trip lengths used as a factor in this study are flawed and are
actually much shorter. He believed that when various committees made their recommendations
they looked at this issue as a “hot potato”. His company had put a hold on contracts 30 days ago to
see what happens. He suggested volunteers be recruited to monitor trip generation and trip length.
He also believed that users ought to pay for the roads under a gas tax. He also suggested the
County buy road rights-of-way for use in the next 20 years at today’s prices to save money.
John Williams
, 1535 Smuggler’s Cove, spoke in favor of this impact fee proposal
and the increase of $3,500 for a home. He looked at it as an increase of only $700 a year for the last
5 years (when it was last increased). He considered it fair to pass these costs to new people and
unfair to pass them to existing homeowners. High property costs to the south have not slowed
growth there. Many have looked to Indian River County where property is still available at lower
cost. It is “baloney” to think that impact fees are going to slow growth. He was opposed to
additional gas tax and urged the Board to go forward with these formulas that have been upheld by
Florida law.
Dr. Chris Tardif
Chairman Ginn advised that was not present and read a letter
from him which stated that he believed the proposed TIF increase will negatively affect medical
services in town because the providers cannot pass their cost increase on to the end user. (Copy of
letter is on file in the office of the Clerk to the Board.)
st
Chip Landers
, 1636 51 Court, on behalf of existing and future taxpayers, opined
that when growth slows so will the proposed impact fees and existing taxpayers will remain. He
wondered how the County would pay when the impact fees drop off. He favored an incremental
May 11, 2004 12
TIF increase each year. He proposed a $50,000,000 bond issue for roads be put on the ballot for
the voters to decide.
th
Allen Green
, 8030 98 Avenue, advised that he builds homes from 1,000 to 2,200
square feet, ranging from $80,000 to $100,000 plus the cost of the lot. The majority of the homes
he builds are for people who are relocating from within the county; this TIF would unfairly burden
them. If the Board does decide to go forward with this proposal, he suggested they agree to a
3-month implementation. He thought a gas tax would be fairer.
Rosie BoylanWilliam J. Mallon,
, 3712 Mockingbird Drive, read a letter from
MD
, into the record opposing the proposed increase in impact fees because “it will create an
artificial moratorium on new medical office space” and “will also unfairly elevate an already
inflated rental market in Vero Beach.” (A copy of this letter is on file with the backup for the
meeting in the Office of the Clerk to the Board.)
Helene Caseltine
, Indian River County Chamber of Commerce, said the major
concerns are workforce housing, and start up business/mall business. The middle income
population is their concern. She urged them to limit the amounts of impact fees and have a
12-month review.
Joseph Paladin
, with a business office at 730 Commerce Drive, believed the
County needs to take into consideration the little guy and have the ability to adjust the impact fees
for a first time home-buyer, those on limited income, or the elderly. In his comment on the
industrial-park-mystery-business, he recommended use of conscience on how funds are spent. He
thought the people who are making money off our county are those who flip property to make a
profit and there is no impact fee for them. The cost of that profit ultimately gets passed on to the
buyer of the house. He suggested those who are flipping property pay for the impact.
Brian Heady,
Vero Beach, considered that impact fees must be a new source of
income for government, the bottom line, it is a new tax on all of us.
Frank Coffey
, 1200 Admirals’ Walk, believed there is a need to increase impact
fees to a reasonable amount. He supported the Chamber of Commerce’s suggestion and urged the
Board not to act on this until they have all the information.
May 11, 2004 13
th
Glenn Legwen
, 5900 5 Street SW, urged the Board to wait until all the facts are in
and then do further study.
Jerry Swanson
, a developer, 1040 E. Polo Grounds Drive, expressed concern
about the effect of impact fees on the medical community; medicine is a clean industry and an
asset to the community. He gave a comparison of current impact fees versus the proposed on a
40,000 square foot medical building. He predicted there would be a dramatic increase of property
costs and a continuous cost increase in property taxes. He urged the Board to delay their decision
in order to take a hard look at the impact fees to make sure they are fair and just.
Discussion ensued on how much the County would receive from an increase in gas
tax.
The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard with regard to this matter.
There being none, the Chairman closed the public hearing.
Chairman Ginn believed that impact fees are supposed to pay for new growth and
gas taxes are for everyone; she was opposed to a gas tax increase.
Commissioner Adams believed that impact fees do slow growth and put the tax
burden on businessmen, not on homesteaded homeowners. She thought this was too great an
increase and that the implementation of any new impact fee needs to be delayed until at least
October and maybe even January.
Director Keating stated that the implementation could be delayed. He suggested
that staff could present the Board with different discount rates. He emphasized that whatever the
rate it needs to be consistently applied to all new construction.
County Administrator Baird added that staff wanted to be certain that the fees
would be defensible in Court. We know the cost per lane but if the Board agrees that they are
willing to discount the fees they must apply them fairly across all industries.
May 11, 2004 14
Commissioner Macht urged the Board to take into consideration a pending
transaction at the industrial park and how the imposition of impact fees might have a negative
affect on it.
Vice Chairman Neuberger stated that no one denies we need impact fees. He
accepted on faith what our expert had said. He suggested the impact fees be implemented slowly
and the Board should come to a consensus on lowering the number.
County Administrator Baird cautioned that if the Board decides to discount the fees
more than 15%, we will have to recover those funds another way or postpone the implementation
of roadways. He then gave them examples of deeper discounts and the resulting impact fees.
Extensive discussion ensued.
Renee Renzi
, Waverly Place, suggested the Board think about capturing some sort
of fee on the land “flips”.
County Attorney Collins responded that, by law, they cannot do that; it had been
proposed at state level but never passed.
Ms. Renzi
then suggested that the Commissioners support this at state level.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Neuberger, SECONDED
by Commissioner Lowther, the Board unanimously tabled
this to their next meeting (May 18) for more information
and discussion.
9.B.1. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM - BRIAN T. HEADY –
IMPOSITION OF IMPACT FEES
Brian Heady
, Vero Beach, did not speak on this topic but expounded on his
complaint that if the Chairman does not like what he has to say, he is told to step down.
May 11, 2004 15
9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM – FRANK ZORC –
REFERENDUM NOVEMBER 2004 ON GROWTH
DEVELOPMENT ISSUE
This was postponed to next week at Mr. Zorc’s request.
9.C.1. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM – PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 18, 2004
ON VERO CHRISTIAN CHURCH’S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL
EXCEPTION AND MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A
PLACE OF WORSHIP (QUASI-JUDICIAL)
The Chairman read the title into the record.
9.C.2. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM – PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 1, 2004
ON J & E OSLO GROVE INVESTMENT’S REQUEST TO
TH
REZONE 10.67 ACRES LOCATED 630 FEET SOUTH OF 9
STREET S.W. (OSLO ROAD) AND APPROXIMATELY 620
FEET EAST OF 27TH AVENUE, FROM RS-6, SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6 UNITS/ACRE) TO RM-6,
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE) (QUASI-JUDICIAL)
The Chairman read the title into the record.
May 11, 2004 16
9.C.3. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM – PUBLIC HEARING SET FOR JUNE
8, 2004 – PARKWOOD LAND INVESTMENT INC.’S REQUEST
TO REZONE 9.3 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST
THTH
CORNER OF 66 AVENUE AND 26 STREET, FROM A-1,
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (UP TO 1 UNIT/5 ACRES), TO
RM-6, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (UP TO 6
UNITS/ACRE) (QUASI-JUDICIAL)
The Chairman read the title into the record.
9.C.4. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM – PUBLIC HEARING SET FOR
AUGUST 17, 2004 TO CONSIDER THE DEVELOPMENT
ORDER (DO) FOR THE WATERWAY VILLAGE – DIVOSTA
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRI)
MOVED FROM 7.J.
The Chairman read the title into the record.
TH
11.I.1. UTILITY EASEMENT AT 16 STREET BALL FIELD
REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Vice Chairman Neuberger, the Board unanimously granted
May 11, 2004 17
the easement, as recommended in the memorandum dated
April 29, 2004.
DEED OF EASEMENT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
(COPY OF RECORDED DOCUMENT IS ALSO ON FILE)
11.I.2. EAST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MASTER STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN - VORTEX TREATMENT SYSTEMS
AT THE MAIN RELIEF CANAL, NORTH RELIEF CANAL,
AND SOUTH RELIEF CANAL IN THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS
WATER CONTROL DISTRICT – CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
- WORK ORDER NO. 5 FOR FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN
Chairman Ginn commented this was a good job and very complete work.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Vice Chairman Neuberger, the Board unanimously
approved Work Order No. 5 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Carter Associates, Inc. for Final Design
Services and Construction Management Services for
Stormwater Pollution Control Systems in the Main Relief
Canal, the South Relief Canal, and the North Relief Canal
and authorized the Chairman to execute same, as
recommended in the memorandum dated May 5, 2004.
WORK ORDER NO. 5 IS ON FILE
May 11, 2004 18
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
11.J.1. SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION
(SCADA) SYSTEM UPGRADES - LIFT STATIONS,
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES AND
RECLAIMED WATER SITES – AUTHORIZATION TO
PROCEED WITH BIDDING
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lowther, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized
the Utilities Services staff to proceed with bidding for the
proposed project, as recommended in the memorandum
dated May 3, 2004.
11.J.2. WALKER WOODS APARTMENTS OFF SITE FORCE MAIN
RD
ON 33 STREET (THE OAK CHASE AND THE SANCTUARY
THTH
SUBDIVISIONS) FROM 66 TO 58 AVENUES – PAYMENT
REQUEST NO. 17/FINAL – WALKER WOODS CLUB LTD.
(CORONADO DEVELOPMENT, INC.)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Lowther, the Board unanimously approved
the Developer’s Request for Payment No. 17 – FINAL, by
Coronado Development, Inc., in the amount of $38,645.99,
as recommended in the memorandum dated April 28, 2004.
May 11, 2004 19
DOCUMENT WILL BE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WHEN EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
11.J.3. UTILITY RELOCATIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
MISCELLANEOUS PROPOSED PUBLIC WORKS DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS #0365, #0367, #0368, #0369, #0395,
AND #9922 – GEORGE E. FRENCH - WORK
AUTHORIZATION DIRECTIVE NO. 2001-085
ON MOTION by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED
by Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
approved the utilities relocation project at a total cost of
$129,551.14 and authorized the Chairman to execute Work
Authorization Directive No. 2001-85 to George E. French,
Labor Contractor, and authorized payment to him of up to
$100,366.04, as recommended in the memorandum dated
April 26, 2004.
WORK AUTHORIZATION DIRECTIVE NO. 2001-85 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
13.A CHAIRMAN CAROLINE D. GINN
None.
13.B. VICE CHAIRMAN ARTHUR R. NEUBERGER
None.
May 11, 2004 20
13.C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS
None.
13.D. COMMISSIONER THOMAS S. LOWTHER
None.
13.E. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT
None.
14.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
None.
14.B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
None.
14.C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
None.
ALL BACKUP DOCUMENTATION, RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AND ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES
May 11, 2004 21
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 12:28 p.m.
ATTEST:
_________________________________ ________________________________
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Caroline D. Ginn, Chairman
Minutes Approved: _________________
BCC/PMR/MINUTES
May 11, 2004 22