HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/21/1979WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1979
THE BOARD.OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO
BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1979, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK
A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE*-
LOY, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.; R. DON DEESON; AND
PATRICK B. LYONS. ALSO PRESENT WERE .JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; AND
JANICE W. CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERK.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE
FLAG, AND REVEREND WILLIAM "BUDDY" TIPTON, CENTRAL ASSEMBLY OF GOD,
GAVE THE INVOCATION.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR
CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19,
1979.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1979, AS WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR
CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 10,
1979.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OF OCTOBER 1 , 1979, AS WRITTEN.
ON MOTION Y COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLLS,
CIRCUIT COURT, FALL TERM, 1979, IN THE AMOUNT OF $134.80; COUNTY
COURT, OCTOBER TERM, 1979, IN THE AMOUNT OF $128.42; AND NOVEMBER
TERM, 1979, IN THE AMOUNTS OF $164.10, AND $82.04.
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
NOV 1979 Boor 42 PAGE 98
NOV 211979
840K 42 PACE 99
REPORT OF TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU - SPECIAL
TRUST FUND, OCTOBER, 1979
TRAFFIC VIOLATION FINES BY NAME, OCTOBER, 1979
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORTS FROM:
INDIAN RIVER MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
FELLSMERE WATER CONTROL DISTRICT
INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
SHERIFF, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
TAX COLLECTOR, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PROPERTY APPRAISER, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
THE BOARD THEN WELCOMED THE NEW URBAN FORESTER, MITCHELL
ADELMAN, WHO WAS INTRODUCED BY VAN MURPHY,,D-I-STRICT FORESTER.
WENDY LANCASTER, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, NEXT DISCUSSED
WITH THE BOARD THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE OSLO SQUARE
SITE PLAN EXTENSION:
INOIAN RIVER COUNTY
PLAN
r, ei IDEPARTIVIENT
November 14,. 1979
MEMO
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Oslo Square Site Plan Extension
The Planning Department has. -
received a request from Peter C. Smith
and Associates fora 90 day extension of the Oslo Square Shopping.
Center site plan. 'Site plan approval terminates after°twelve (12)
months if construction has not been started.,—Site plan approval for
this project was granted September 28,.1978. The majority of land
clearing has already been accomplished.: _
After reviewing this, request,,it-is.recommended that the following
items be submitted::"w4{-=
1) Drainage plan in accordance with newly adopted drainage
criteria (Sec. 23, K) . t`
2) Topographic survey as required by new site plan criteria
(Sec. -'23, F., 5).
3) Water and sewer franchise data as.required (Sec. 23, 12).
4) Evidence that the Department of Transportation has conducted
a traffic study of the U.S.#1 _ Oslo Road intersection with
regards to this project. Also,,a statement from the developer
that they will bear the cost of any highway improvements such
as median cuts and traffic control devices (Technical Review
Committee minutes, 10-3-78).
With the submittal of these additional items, the Planning Department
would recommend the 90 day extension be granted.
WENDY LANCASTER NOTED THAT THE SITE PLAN DOES COMPLY
WITH THE 1978 LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE; HOWEVER, AFTER TALKING WITH
ATTORNEY COLLINS, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEELS THEY SHOULD
CHANGE THEIR RECOMMENDATION. SHE CONTINUED THAT THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FELT THE NEW DRAINAGE CRITERIA, RECENTLY ADOPTED BY
THE COUNTY, SHOULD APPLY; AND.BECAUSE THIS CRITERIA MAY DRASTICALLY
CHANGE THE PRESENT SITE PLAN, THEY FELT A NEW SITE PLAN SHOULD
BE SUBMITTED.
CHARLES T. CONNERY, OF PETER C. SMITH & ASSOCIATES,
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THEY
WOULD LIKE TO GET AN EXTENSION IF POSSIBLE.
NOV 2 i 1979 3 MOK ` PAGE 100
pr-
NOV 211979 BooK URGE
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED HIM WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THE TREES
THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO BE SAVED.
MR. CONNERY EXPLAINED THAT THEY HAD TROUBLE WITH THE
TWO CLEARING MEN - THEY WERE ASKED TO SAVE THE TREES BUT DIDN'T.
COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT DRAINAGE IS THE PRIME
CONCERN AND WONDERED IF THE EXTENSION ON THE SITE PLAN IS REALLY
GOING TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM.
MR. CONNERY STATED THAT HE WOULD FOLLOW THE NEW SITE
PLAN CRITERIA IF THIS IS WHAT THE BOARD REQUESTED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INTERJECTED THAT A 90 DAY EXTENSION
WOULD GIVE THEM UNTIL DECEMBER 29TH, AS IT DID EXPIRE ON SEPTEMBER
28TH.
MR. CONNERY STATED THAT THEY WOULD NEED MORE TIME THAN
THAT, AND THEY HAVE ABOUT 80% OF THE ENGINEERING ALREADY COMPLETED
AND COULD COME IN FOR A FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH 30 DAYS BUT
NOT SOONER.
-DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS FELT THE APPLICANT SHOULD
BEGIN AGAIN WITH A NEW SITE PLAN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE REQUEST FOR A SITE PLAN
EXTENSION.
WENDY LANCASTER, PLANNING, DEPARTMENT, NEXT DISCUSSED A
REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF TURTLE COVE SUBDIVISION, BY
JAMES A. FOWLER, REPRESENTING RICHARD P. LETSINGER. SHE NOTED THAT
THE PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 14k UNDEVELOPED ACRES AND IS TWO MILES
NORTH OF STATE ROAD 510 ON THE WEST SIDE OF AIA. MISS LANCASTER
STATED THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BUT
THAT AN ADDITIONAL 20' BE DEDICATED ALONG AIA, AND THAT DRAINAGE
BE DESIGNED TO TAKE CARE OF THE STORM WATER ON SITE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS, AS PER THE
FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM BY .JACK ALLEN OF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT:
i
STATE OF FLORIDA
t DEPARTMENT OF Rtubin O I7 Afkow, Governor
Health & Rehabilitative services
District Nine
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH UNIT 2525 — 14th AVENUE VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
T0: Members of Indian River County Technical Review Committee
FROM: Jack Allen, Indian River County Health Uni
DATE: November 1, 1979
r
SUBJECT: Items up for consideration on November 6, 1979
{1,'J Turtle Cove S/D, Richard P. Letsinger, Agent'
All lots in the proposed layout contain the minimum one-half acre, which
meets health department requirements as to lot size for septic tank systems
and individual wells.
However, we will need a soil profile delineating soil classification to a i
depth of six (6) feet or the water table, whichever is the lesser, from a
representative point within the proposed subdivision, prior to giving our
tentative approval.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE DISCUSSED THE POSSIBILITY OF THE
DEVELOPER HAVING A TENTATIVE LAYOUT OF THE SUBDIVISION BEFORE THE
HEALTH DEPARTMENT CAN DO THEIR SOIL TESTING, BUT THEY WOULD NOT
NEED TO PROVIDE SOIL CLASSIFICATION ON EVERY LOT.
PLANNER REVER REPORTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS
NOT BEEN INVOLVED WITH REQUIRING ANY PERCOLATION TESTING; THEREFORE,
WOULD LIKE THE BOARD, IN THE FUTURE, TO CONSIDER THAT SPOT CHECKS
OF EACH SUBDIVISION BE TAKEN IF SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS ARE TO BE USED
IN THE AREA.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IF THE PERCOLATION TESTS
DO NOT SATISFY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT, THEN THE DEVELOPERS WOULD
HAVE TO GO TO A SEWER PLANT.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT STREET AND HOUSE NUMBERS FOR
SUBDIVISIONS.
PLANNER REVER STATED THAT SINCE THEIR DEPARTMENT NOW
HAS NEW MAPS, THEY COULD ASSIGN NUMBERS ONCE THE SITE PLAN RECEIVED
TENTATIVE APPROVAL. HE ALSO FELT THAT THE PRELIMINARY STAGE IS
THE MOST IMPORTANT AND THAT TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR THE DEVELOP-
MENT SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR REVIEW BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
NOV 211979 5 60K =42 PACE x.02
NOV 2 11979
BOCK 42. PAGE 103:
RICHARD LETSINGER, DEVELOPER, COMMENTED THAT HE SAW
NO OBJECTION TO HAVING A COUPLE OF SOIL TEST BORINGS DONE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS INTERJECTED THAT IT WOULD BE GOOD
INSURANCE FOR THE DEVELOPER.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF TURTLE COVE SUB-
DIVISION, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE DEVELOPER WILL HAVE
SOIL TESTING TO A DEPTH OF 6' OR THE WATER TABLE, WHICHEVER IS
THE LESSER, AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS SOIL TEST.
ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED HE ADD TO THE MOTION THAT,
IN THE EVENT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THE TEST IS UNSATIS-
FACTORY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BUILD A SEWER PLANT ADEQUATE TO
SERVICE THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. HE CONTINUED THAT
HE IS CONCERNED THAT IF THERE IS TENTATIVE APPROVAL WITHOUT THE
REQUIREMENT OF SOIL APPROVAL, THE BOARD MAY FIND ITSELF BOUND TO
GRANT FINAL APPROVAL. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HIS CONCEPT IS TO
BE AS CLEAR AS POSSIBLE IN GRANTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL; THE MOTION
IS SATISFACTORY BUT FELT THE ALTERNATIVES SHOULD BE MENTIONED.
MR. LETSINGER STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE
RIGHT TO WITHDRAW AS HE DIDNIT WANT TO BE COMPELLED TO DEVELOP
AND BUILD A SEWER PLANT.
.JAMES FOWLER, SURVEYOR, REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE THE SOIL
TEST BORING AND WOULD BE GLAD TO TURN IT OVER TO THE HEALTH
DEPARTMENT.
COMMISSIONER LYONS WITHDREW HIS MOTION, AND COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT WITHDREW HIS SECOND.
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED, IN ORDER TO BE CONSISTENT,
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BE DIRECTED TO GIVE THE BOARD A POLICY TO
dmiull f
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF THE
TURTLE COVE SUBDIVISION UPON THE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT THE
DEVELOPER MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN THE MEMORANDUM OF
NOVEMBER 1, 1979 FROM JACK ALLEN OF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT.
WENDY LANCASTER APPROACHED THE=BOARD REGARDING A REQUEST
FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF OCEANRIDGE SUBDIVISION, REQUESTED BY
JAMES A. FOWLER, REPRESENTING JOSEPH .JORDANO. SHE NOTED THAT
THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY.25 ACRES- LOCATED ON SOUTH AIA EAST OF THE
HIGHWAY, ACROSS FROM ST. EDWARDS, SHE NOTED THAT THE OWNER HAS
PROVIDED FOR 20' OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALSO PROVIDED FOR A NON -ACCESS
STRIP WHICH WOULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE WESTERLY 10' OF AN INTERNAL
ROAD.. PISS LANCASTER CONTINUED THAT ALL LOTS ARE PRIVATE, AND
THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE SUGGESTED THAT SINCE THE NAMES
ON THE PLAN DO NOT CONFORM TO THE COUNTY ROAD NAMING SYSTEM
STANDARDS, THE NAMES BE CHANGED; AND APPLICANT PROPOSES A WATER
TREATMENT PLANT AND SEPTIC TANKS. SHE THEN DISCUSSED THE COMMENTS
IN THE MEMO FROM .JACK ALLEN OF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT, AS FOLLOWS:
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF Reubin OM Askew, Governor
Health & Rehabilitative Services
District Nine
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH UNIT 2525 —14th AVENUE VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TO: Members of Indian River County Technical Review Committee
FROM: Jack Allen, Indian River County Health Uni
DATE: November 1, 1979
SUBJECT: Items up for consideration on November 6, 1979
OceanriLe S/D. Jack P. Schleifer, Trustee \,
Senate Bill 755 has been signed into law by the Governor.
This particular bill states in part, "Residential subdivisions with a public
water system, may utilize individual sewage disposal facilities, provided
there are no more than four (4) lots per acre, etc."
Rules and regulations necessary to implement the law are now being promul-
gated and going through the final process towards adoption by the Department j
of Health and Rehabilitative Services.
Since there are still some unanswered questions pertaining to the law, the
health department is unable to give its tentative approval to this sub-
division pending clarification and final adoption of the new rules and
regulations.
NOV 211979
7 AOOK 42AGE104
J
NOV 211979
600K 42 FACE 105 -
COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT HOW MANY ACCESSES TO
THE BEACH THEY WERE PLANNING.
.JAMES FOWLER, SURVEYOR, COMMENTED THERE IS JUST ONE,
WHICH IS A FOOT BRIDGE ARRANGEMENT; AND SINCE THE SUBDIVISION
REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING, THEY HAVE PLACED A WALKWAY ACROSS TO
PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE DUNE LINES. HE CONTINUED THAT THE DEVELOPER'S
INTENT IS TO PROTECT THE VEGETATION AND CREATE A SUBDIVISION SIMILAR
TO SEA GROVE.
PLANNER REVER STATED THAT HIS STAFF WOULD TAKE CARE OF
THE NUMBERING FOR THE STREETS. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY WILL BE
DILIGENT IN ATTACHING NUMBERS AS WELL AS STREET NAMES FROM NOW ON.
PLANNER REVER NOTED THAT THEIR BOOK OF STREET NAMES DOES NOT INCLUDE
A TANGLEWOOD STREET.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, FOR TENTATIVE_ APPROVAL FOR OCEANRIDGE SUBDIVISION,
SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEALTH; DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS.
-COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT WE SHOULD CAUTION THE
DEVELOPER THAT THERE ARE SOME UNKNOWNS WITH THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT
AND FINAL APPROVAL CANNOT BE GIVEN UNTIL THEY ARE SETTLED,
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED ADDING TO HER MOTION: SUBJECT
TO THE COMPLETION OF PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM WITH APPROPRIATE FRANCHISE,
OR ALTERNATE WATER FROM A PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM PRIOR TO FINAL
APPROVAL.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES.
COMMISSIONER Loy WITHDREW HER MOTION AND COMMISSIONER
DEESON WITHDREW HIS SECOND.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL FOR
OCEANRIDGE SUBDIVISION, AND TENTATIVE APPROVAL IS CONDITIONED UPON
COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES`
RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING SEPTIC TANKS, AND THE DEVELOPER
HAVING IN PLACE A PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM WITH APPROPRIATE -FRANCHISE
ISSUED, OR WATER SUPPLIED FROM A PUBLIC SOURCE PRIOR TO THE BOARD
GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PLAT.
WENDY.LANCASTER, PLANNING -DEPARTMENT, NEXT BROUGHT BEFORE
THE BOARD A REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF WEST MEADOWS SUB-
DIVISION, REQUESTED BY JAMES A. FOWLER, REPRESENTING .JACK REDISH.
SHE STATED THAT THE PROPERTY RUNS NORTH OF 4TH STREET, WEST OF
43RD AVENUE, AND IS APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES, WITH LOT SIZES OF 172
ACRE AND ZONED R-1. THIS PROPERTY WILL HAVE INDIVIDUAL WELLS AND
SEPTIC TANKS, AND THERE WILL BE A 1/2 ROAD TO THE NORTH FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT OF 6TH STREET. MISS LANCASTER CONTINUED THAT THE
SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED DEMUCKING BE DONE, IF
NECESSARY, IN THE LOW AREA, AND FILLING IT; ALSO THE FILLING OF THE
INTERIOR DITCHES, AND RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE APPROVAL, SHE THEN
REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM ALLAN S. CONNELL OF THE SOIL
CONSERVATION SERVICE:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SUMF(IT Sall- S R �nn'7� eMY U-)453 ' /j' '/�Utxc>s DATE: .11-13-79
Su'a "--), V,S." iJ
TO: ..L/t�t�//��l Fitt,160` CO. jL✓iR%L�i'/���i DZ..P%.
CL •.CL�•r.�� .".L- f�L' tf�rl Gti��l.-�Yl,•�Ll-��.. C�%�.��`,..�
63"
`ut-- ez� ,,,GL
��-�✓ �`
NOV 2x.1979 9 BOOK 42 AGE 108
r- I
NOV 211979 6009 42 . PAGE 107
JAMES A. FOWLER, SURVEYOR, STATED THAT THE DEVELOPER
REALIZED THAT FOUR LOTS TO THE WEST WERE BAD AND THAT HE MAY HAVE
TO USE APPROXIMATELY 2'2` OF FILL.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THIS SHOULD BE CONTINUED UNTIL
THEY DO TEST BORINGS TO DETERMINE IF THE LOTS ARE SUITABLE, AND
THAT SPECIFIC PLANS FOR MAKING THEM SUITABLE BE KNOWN PRIOR TO OUR
CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE APPROVAL.
COMMISSIONER LYONS QUESTIONED THAT IF HE ONLY HAS 12"
OF SOIL AND GOES DOWN TO S' OF CLAY, WHAT ABOUT THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM?
HE FELT THERE WOULD BE A LOT OF SURFACE WATER.
MR. FOWLER REPORTED THAT THEIR ENGINEER DID A COMPLETE
STUDY ON THE DITCHES AND CULVERTS; IN ESSENCE, THE DITCHES WILL
BE FILLED IN ON THE WEST AND WATER WILL END UP ON THE SOUTH, AND
THE CULVERT WILL BE ENLARGED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE
SUFFICIENT INFORMATION AT THIS POINT.
MR. FOWLER THOUGHT THAT THEY WEREN'T REQUIRED TO HAVE
AN ENGINEERING REPORT BEFORE A TENTATIVE PLAN IS APPROVED.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT WHAT IS INVOLVED IN A TENTATIVE
MR. FOWLER STATED THAT THE DEVELOPER AGREED THAT THE
PROPERTY WOULD BE BROUGHT UP TO THE GRADE THAT THE COUNTY WANTED,
HE AGAIN STATED THAT THEY DID AN ENTIRE ENGINEERING STUDY ON THE
RUN-OFF TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF DRAINAGE PATTERN THERE WAS ON THE
PROPERTY.
ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED HAVING THE ENGINEER PRESENT
AT THE NEXT MEETING WITH PERCOLATION TESTS SO THAT THE BOARD CAN
MAKE A MORE INTELLIGENT DECISION.
COMMISSIONER LYONS EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE WHOLE
DRAINAGE PATTERN, SINCE THEY ARE NOW TALKING ABOUT CLOSING THE
DITCHES.
MR, FOWLER EXPLAINED THAT THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE
WANTED THEM CLOSED BECAUSE THEY ARE IN THE CENTER OF THE LOTS.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS
SIONER SIEBERT THAT TENTATIVE APPROVAL BE DENIED PENDING FURTHER
INFORMATION FROM THE DEVELOPER, AND THAT IT BE CONTINUED TO THE
AFTERNOON OF THE NEXT MEETING, DECEMBER 51 1979.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW
THE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HE AGREED WITH
THE BOARD TO OBTAIN MORE INFORMATION. HE NOTED THAT IN SOME CASES,
A DEVELOPMENT OF THIS KIND CAN BE MADE AND THE FINAL PLAT GETS
ON RECORD, BUT EVERYTHING WILL BE BUILT UP BUT NOT THE LOW AREA.
HE CONTINUED THAT IF THE DEVELOPER DOESN'T EVER FILL IN THE LOW
AREA, THEN YOU HAVE A MUCK POND IN BETWEEN RESIDENCES, WHICH MAKES
AN AREA THAT IS UNSATISFACTORY. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REITERATED
THAT WHEN TENTATIVE APPROVAL IS GIVEN, THE COUNTY WANTS SOME
ASSURANCES THAT THE LOW AREAS WILL BE PROPERLY TAKEN CARE OF.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON
AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA WAS THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY
INTO THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES AND A CHANGE OF ZONING FROM
R-1 To R -2A.
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT IT WAS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE
COMMISSION TO CONSENT TO AN INCREASE IN ZONING PRIOR TO THE
COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION. HE CONTINUED THAT HE THOUGHT THE TOWN
OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES HAS TO AGREE TO THIS FIRST. THE ITEM WAS
THEN WITHDRAWN FROM THE AGENDA.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THAT THE NEXT ITEM, WHICH WAS FOR
FINAL APPROVAL OF ISLAND SHORES SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE TOWN OF
INDIAN RIVER SHORES, REQUESTED BY .JAMES BEINDORF, DID NOT NECESSARILY
NEED THE BOARDS APPROVAL.
HENRY MUELLER, DEVELOPER, THEN APPROACHED THE BOARD AND
DISPLAYED A PLAT OF THE PROPERTY, AND STATED HE WAS PRESENT ON THE
ADVICE OF HIS ENGINEER; BUT THAT THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES
NOV 2x.1979 11
8001(• 2 FAGEIQ$
NOV 2 11979 8000 42 PACE 109
DID NOT FEEL IT WAS NECESSARY. HE CONTINUED THAT THE SITE BORDERS
COUNTY LAND, AND THERE HAVE BEEN NO COMPLICATIONS AND HE IS READY
TO PROCEED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT. MR. MUELLER ADDED THAT THEY
HAVE PROVIDED DECELERATION LANES FROM THE HIGHWAY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF ISLAND
SHORES SUBDIVISION.
DAVID MARSH, SENIOR PLANNER, APPROACHED THE BOARD RE-
GARDING THE REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 5 AND 6,
BLOCK A, OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION UNIT 2, REQUESTED BY LUCIEN J.
MICHAUD. HE NOTED THAT THE EXISTING DRAINAGE IS PRIMARILY TO THE
FRONT SWALE. MR. MARSH SAID HIS DEPARTMENT FELT THE REQUEST TO
RELEASE THE NORTH SIDE LOT OF LOT 6 AND THE SOUTH SIDE LOT OF
LOT 5 IS ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THAT ADJOINING SIDE LOTS ON LOTS 6
AND % DIRECTLY SOUTH ARE RETAINED FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE CROSS -
DRAINAGE PURPOSE. HE COMMENTED THEY RECOMMEND APPROVAL SUBJECT
TO PROPERTY OWNER S UNDERSTANDING THAT ABUTTING SIDE LOTS FOR
LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK A,�OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION UNIT 2 ARE TO BE
RETAINED FOR FUTURE NEEDS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 79-114-A
APPROVING RELEASE OF EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK A,
OSLO PARK UNIT 2, AS REQUESTED BY LUCIEN .J. MICHAUD, SUBJECT TO
PROPERTY OWNER S UNDERSTANDING THAT ABUTTING SIDE LOTS FOR LOTS
6 AND 7, BLOCK A, OSLO PARK SUBDIVISION UNIT 2 ARE TO BE RETAINED
FOR FUTURE NEEDS, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN;
THESE DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT.
RESOLUTION NO. 7 9-114 -A
MlEREAS, there is drainage and utility easement on each side of
the lot lines of Oslo Park, Block A, as filed in Plat Book 4, Page 13,
Indian River County, Florida, records, and
UBM EAS, Lucien J. Michaud and Stephanie B. Michaud, his wife,
are the owners of Lots 5 and 6, Block A, Oslo Park, Unit 2, Plat Book 4,
Page 13, Indian River County, Florida,
WkEFEAS, said property is in site plan approval for erection of a
building on said lots, which said building will lie over side lot line
easement on south side of Lot 5, Block A and the North easement of
Lot 6, of Block A, Oslo Park, Unit 2; and
NOW, TEFREF'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida as follows:
1. The Board does hereby release the 2.5 foot side lot line easement
over the South 2.5 feet of Trot 5, Block A and the North 2.5 feet of Lot 6f
Block A, of said Oslo Park, Unit 2, but it is specifically understood that
the side lot line easement on the North side lot line of Lot 5 will remain
in full force and effect.
2. That the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners be
authorized to sign a Release of Easement as above set out, and to have
said Release recorded in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
Dated this 21st day of November , 1979.
BOARD OF COUNTY C)MSSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
William C. Wodtke, Jr., Cha
w �• • i _;��1L4 ��1C�
800K 42 PACE
NOV 2 11979 t
NOV 2 11979
RECFASE OF EASIMU
Boos 42 PAc£
THIS RELEASE OF EASEMENT, made and executed this 21stday of
November , 1979, between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, party of
the first part, arld LUCIEN J. MICHAUD and STEPHANIE B. NICHAUD, his
wife, parties of the second part;
WITNESSETH:
For and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 ($10.00)
DOLLARS and other good and valuable considerations, in hand paid by
the parties of the second part, the receipt whereof being hereby
acknowledged, the said party of the first part does herewith release,
discharge and quit claim unto the said parties of the second part,
their heirs, legal representatives, and assigns, forever, the easements
in favor of the party of the first part on real property situated in
Indian River County, Florida, which said easements are as follows:
The North 2.5 feet of Int 5
The South 2.5 feet of Lot 6
All on Block A, as shown on a plat of OSLO PARK, Unit 2
and recorded in the Public Records of Indian River
County, Florida, Plat Book 4, page 13.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part, by virtue of the
authority vested by law in the Board of County Commissioners and for
and on behalf of the County of Indian River, State of Florida, have
caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Chairman and
its seal to be affixed, attested by its Clerk of the Circuit Court.
Signed sealed & delivered
in the presence of:
BOARD OF COUNTY COY1MISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
I
BY
William C. Wodtke, Jr., irman
ATTEST:
FREDA WRIGHT, Clerk of the
Circuit Court
BY
STATE Or FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly
authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments,
personally appeared WILLIAM C. WOME, JR., as Chairman of the Board
of County Ccmi.ssioners of Indian River County, State of Florida, and
acknowledged before me executing the above and foregoing instrument,
in the presence of two subscribing witnesses, freely and voluntarily,
under the authority duly vested in him by Law, and that the Seal of
the said Board of County Ca mtissioners of Indain River County, State
of Florida, affixed thereto is the true seal of the foregoing.
WITNESS,
- my hand and official seal in the State and County this
/ "e' day of 1979.
NOV 2 11979
at #11AMAZZAAlelo
Notary lic, State of r^ rida
at Large
My commission expires:
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FtCRIDA AT LARa
MY CUM."!, I i�. f I I.S ' 1 l
NONDED THRU G:' I R' l INS U*1aERW X I TV3
(SEAL)
BOOK , PAGE
_I
NOV 2 11979
gooK 42 PAGE 113
DAVID MARSH, SENIOR PLANNER, NEXT DISCUSSED WITH THE
BOARD A STREET NAME CHANGE, REQUESTED BY RESIDENTS OF SURF
COLONY, TO CHANGE THE NAME OF TAMRICH ROAD TO SEA TURTLE LANE.
HE STATED THAT HE CHECKED INTO THIS AND FOUND THERE IS NOT
ANOTHER SEA TURTLE LANE IN THE COUNTY, AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL
OF THE REQUEST.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 79-115
CHANGING THE NAME FROM TAMRICH ROAD TO SEA TURTLE LANE IN SURF
COLONY SUBDIVISION.
� � r
RESOLUTION NO. 79 - 115
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, approve the filing of a plat
for Surf Colony Subdivision, which plat was recorded in
Plat Book 3, page 37, Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida, and
WHEREAS, the plat, as recorded, contained a public
road referred to as "Tamrich Road", and
WHEREAS, the property owners within Surf Colony
Subdivision now desire to change the name of Tamrich Road to
Sea Turtle Lane, and
WHEREAS, Sea Turtle Lane has been the name commonly
used for Tamrich Road, and
WHEREAS, petitioners desire the name change without
amendment to the plat,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Tamrich Road,
as located in Surf Colony Subdivision, shall from this date be
commonly referred to as Sea Turtle Lane with a numerical designa-
tion of 16th Place
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution
be mailed to the property owners and other appropriate governmental
authorities.
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 21st
day of November , 1979.
Attest:
J
Freda Wright, Cle
NOV 21.1979
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
r �C/
William C. Wodtke, Jr Chairman
�QOK 2 RAGE 1.14
r
NOV 211979
600K 42 PAGE 1,1.5
ART CHALLACOMBE, OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, NEXT BROUGHT
BEFORE THE BOARD PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE
LAUNDRY.AND DRY CLEANING ESTABLISHMENTS AS SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WITH
THE C-1 AND C -IA COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AS FOLLOWS:
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROPOSED CHANGES
TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE 71-3 TO INCLUDE LAUNDRY AND DRY CLEANING ESTABLISH-
MENTS AS SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS WITH THE C-1 AND C -1A COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
EXISTING SITUATION: Presently the County Zoning Ordinance allows dry cleaning
establishments to be located only within the M-1, Restricted Industrial District.
Self-service type laundry operations are permitted -within the B-1, Planned Business
District. Both types of uses, however, are not allowed in the C -1A and C-1, Com-
mercial Districts under the current wording in the ordinance. A request for a
public hearing to permit laundry and dry cleaning establishments as a special
exception within the C -1A and C-1, Commercial Districts was initiated by the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
RECOMMENDATIONS: An examination of the use intensities of
1) self-service type laundry and dry cleaning establishments, and
2) commercial laundry/dry cleaning establishments
show that these types of services should be considered separately in establishing
uses within the zoning districts.
The Planning staff feels that the intent in establishing the B-1, Planned Business
District is to provide a "buffer" zone between residential and more intense com-
mercial uses. Compatible uses within this zone are restricted commercial trades
and services. Although self-service laundry/dry cleaning establishments are per-
mitted within the B-1, Planned Business District, the staff finds that this type
of use is not of compatible intensity and would be permitted under the C -1A, Com-
mercial District as a limited general commercial trade and/or service.
The staff further finds that the intent in establishing the C-1, Commercial District
is to provide for highway oriented commercial activities requiring high volume use
and traffic flow. Both self-service and professional laundry/dry cleaning services
are compatible uses and should be permitted within the C-1, Commercial District.
In addition, professional laundry/dry cleaning establishments should continue to be
permitted within the M-1, Restricted Industrial District.
SUMMARY: Although the Planning and Zoning Commission originally requested a
public hearing to include laundry/dry cleaning establishments as a special exception
within the C -1A, Restricted Commercial and C-1, Commercial Districts, -the Planning
staff feels that self-service and professional laundry/dry cleaning establishments
should be considered as separate use types.
Staff recommends that self-service and professional laundry/dry cleaning establish
ments be prohibited within the B-1, Planned Business District, except that self-
service establishments be permitted within the C -1A, Restricted Commercial District.
Staff further recommends that self-service and professional laundry/dry cleaning
establishments be permitted within the C-1, Commercial District and that pro-
fessional establishments continue to be permitted within the M-1, Restricted
Industrial District.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES.
go
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADVERTISEMENT
FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE INCLUSION OF SELF-SERVICE AND PRO-
FESSIONAL LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING ESTABLISHMENTS BE PERMITTED WITHIN
THE C-1, PROFESSIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS CONTINUE WITHIN THE M-1, AND
THEIR REMOVAL FROM THL B-1, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MEMO FROM
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
NOV 2 11979
19 640K 42 PAGE 11.6
NOV 211979 BOOK 42 PAGE J 7
PLANNER REVER NEXT DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE POPULA—
TION FIGURES FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
i"r t
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION UNIVE°SITY OF FLORIDA • GAINESVILLE
Bureau of Economic and Business Research a Division of Population Studies
.11-o+r V. In f%4• (.r•r..cuv /rderai-efr tc rroPcrwive pn�2r�rlfn+p pn,grar;
November 1, 1979
Finance Officer
Indian River County Courthouse
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Sir or Madam:
221 mai, Orly N.ul1
904 a 3x12.0171
Enclosed is a notice of our prf•lirninary estimate of the April 1, 1979
population of your area. This estimate was produced under contract with
the State of Florida for use as one factor determining the distribution
of state revenue sharing funds under the provision of Section 23.019,
Florida Statutes (Revenue Sharing Act, 1972). Please confirm your
receipt of this preliminary estimate by signing one copy of the enclosed
form and returning it in the postage -paid return envelope.
Since this estimate will directly impact your revenue sharing allocation
it must be as accurate as possible. To aid you in evaluating the esti-
mate we have enclosed a summary of the data on which the estimate was
based. Please evaluate the estimate and mark the appropriate response
on the form before returning it. If you decide the estimate is inac-
curate please indicate the figure you support and include lily available
documentation. When we complete our review of your alternative estimate
we will notify you whether or riot our preliminary estirnate has been
revised.
Your aid in evaluating these vsliuurtes is greatly appreciated. If you
have any question: please phone either m(, or my associate, hl:;. Nelinda
S. Craine at (904) 392-0171. As our contract requires us to finalize
the esLi.mates before January 1, 1f)St), ple:j.Sc sigil and return the en-
closed form before Denib�
Sincerely,
J Bart B. Lewis`
! Chief SL-AiSLlclau
BBL/dmc
Enclosures
M M r
UNINC.
Preliminary population estimate (permanent residents) April 1, 1979
Population Total
Census Chan -0e Due to Population
4/1/70 Annexation Change
22362 0 12987
Preliminary
Preliminary Est.
Estimate
Inmates Less Inmates
4/1/79
4/1/79 4/1/79
35349
281 35068
The population estimate proposed for state revenue sharing, 1980-1981
fiscal year, is 35068.
Your preliminary population estimate for April 1, 1979 is 35349
(See enclosed sheet for an explanation of terms.)
Please mark Lhe appropriate response and return one copy of this
form before December 1, 1979. Retain the other copy for your file.
I have reviewed this preliminary population estimate and consider
it to be reasonably accurate.
I have reviewed this preliminary population estimate and do not
consider it to be reasonably accurate. I believe a more accurate
estimate would be I request that you reconsider
your preliminary estimate.
I have reviewed this preliminary population estimate and do not
consider it to be reasonably accurate. I am enclosing documentation
which 1 believe supports an April 1, 1979, estimate of
I request that you review this documentation and reconsider your
preliminary estimate.
lJa Le
Title
Ii1PORTAINI T'^
Signature
Please return oncr copy of this form before December 1, 1979.
Retain the other copy for your file.
IMPORTANT
Bureau of Economic and Business Research
Population Division
221 Mather.ly Ball
llniversity of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
(904) 392-0171
NOV 2 1-1979
21 BOOK 42 PAGE 118
NOV 211979
INDIAN RIVER CO.
goo 42 ?AGE
Preliminary population estimate (permanent residents) April 1, 1979
Population Total Preliminary Preliminary Est.
Census Change Due to Population Estimate Inmates Less Inmates
4/1/70 Annexation Change 4/1/79 4/1/79 4/1/79
35992 0 20769 5676' 281 56480
The population estimate proposed for state revenue sharing, 1980-1981
fiscal year, is 56480.
Your preliminary population estimate for April 1, 1979 is 56761
(See enclosed sheet for an explanation of terms.)
Please mark the appropriate response and return one copy of this
form before December 1, 1979. Retain the other copy for your file.
I have reviewed this preliminary population estimate and consider
it to be reasonably accurate.
I have reviewed this preliminary population estimate and do not
consider it to be reasonably accurate. I believe a more accurate
estimate would be I request that you reconsider
your preliminary estimate.
I have reviewed this preliminary population estimate and do not
consider it to be reasonably accurate. I am enclosing documentation
which I believe supports an April 1, 1979, estimate of
I request that you review this documentation and reconsider your
preliminary estimate.
Date Title Signature
*IMPORTANT*
Please return one copy of tlifs Norm before December 1, 1979.
Retain the other copy for your file.
;:IMPORTANT`^
Bureau of (ironomir and Business Research
Population Division
221 ?fatherly Hall
University of Florida
Gainesville, Fl. 32611 ,
(904) 392-0171
M
11,ATA SIPWMARY FCR PRELIMI`14RY APRIL 1. 1979• POPULATIGN ESTIMATE
E.J �E AJ CF ECCNCM IC AND BUSINESS RESEAYCH
U`.IVL'RS(TY OF FLORIDA
221 MATHFPLY MALL
GAINESVILLE. FL. 32611
1970 HCUSING UNITS= 13779. 1970HCU SCHOL05= 12325. 1970 POP. IN UNITS=
35715.
1;70 OCCGPANCY RATE 0.a94 197, POP. PER UNIT 2.898
•4EDI a•t AC' 1:70= 34.E 65+ IN 1570= 6251. PERCENT 65+ IN 1970=
17.4
BLACKS 1S 7C= 6514. PERCENT BLACK 1970= 18.3
TIME SERIES LATA
1970 1972 1973 1974 1975 1576 1977
1978
1979 1980
POPULATION 3992. 3910D. 43303. 45030. 46254. 46184. 49706.
52333.
�CIFF=RENCE 3116. 4275. 1655. 1216. -70. 2522.
2627.
MECICARE ENRC-LEES 6259. 7381. 7730. 8102. 8553. 9149. 9922.
, 10802.
CIFFERENCE 1122. 349. 372. 451. 596. 713.
880.
ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS 13550. 15877. 17550. 18836. 19471. 20,515. 21936.
23431.
25573.
DIFFERENCE .2327. 1679. 1200. 635. 587. 1878.
1495.
2142.
APRIL CUSTLAtC-:RS O. O. 0. O. O. 0. 0.
23454.
25989.
DIFFERENCE 0. 0. 0. O. 0. O.
- 0.
2535.
INMATES O. 0. 0. 0. 0. 30,277.
279.
281.
DIFFF.REIS_E 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. X67.
2.-
2.
SCHCC1 ENRCLLMENT 6193. 6274. 6479. 6419. 6229. 6033. 6200.
DIFFERENCE Sl. 205. -60. -190. -196. 167.
BIRTHS 570. 561. 608. 500. 544. 584. 642.
688.
DIFFERENCE -9. 47. -28. -3S. 40. 58.
46.
CEA TITS 417. 491. 571. 553. 542. 550. 548.
593.
DIFFERENCE 74. 80. -10. -11. 8. -2.
45.
::OTE- ELECTRIC CUSTC)MRS ARE ACTIVE RESIDENTIAL CUSTLMERS FOP. JULY 1 CF THE YEAR NOTED.
APRIL CUS TCMnPS ARE ACTI`IE RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS FOR APRIL 1 OF THE YEAR NOTED.
SCHCUL ENRCLLMENT INGRADE 1-8. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.
BIRTHS AND DEATHS ARE FCR CALENDAR YEARS.
GROUP CUARTERS MOLTIPLIER(1970 EASE)- 1.00776
1570 RATIO OF HDU+ HOLDS TO ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS- 0.90959
lJA1i7 1970 1970 OCC. POP. IN 1970 PERMTS TOTAL CURRENT
I
TYPE UNITS OCC.UNITS RATE UNi TS PPU 7079 EDITS CHANGE INVENTCRY
SF 10813. 9907. O.Sl6 30202. 3.048 4620. 280. 4340. IS153.
..F 2118. 1580. 0.746 3202.. 2.026 4474. 20. 4454. 6572.
MH 838. 838. I. 000 2000. 2.3136 81. 0. el. 919.
TOTAL 13769. 12325. 0.895 35404. 2.872 9175. 300. .8875. 22644.
N3 -.E- EDITS 1NC LLCE All SUITRACTIONS FROM THE INVENTORY.
TFEY APE MAINLY CANCELLED PERMITS AND DEMOLITIONS.
CCC. RATE FCR MCUILE hCMES = 1.0 BECAUSE CENSUS COUNTED ONLY
PERMANENTLY OCCUPIED POBILE HCME UNITS.
1970 UNITS HELD FOR OCCASIONAL USE= 386. 2.00 PERCENT 3F ALL YEAR ROUND UNITS
1970 TOTAL UNITS - ALL YEAR-ROUND UNITS + SEASONAL UNITS= 141ll.
1970 SEASCNAL UNITS= 33:.. CR 2.35 PERCENT OF TOTAL UNITS.
PERCENT CF TCTAL U,ITS OCCUPIED BY NCHPERMANENTS- 5.1
tNDIAN RIVER UNINCCR
:ATA SUMMARY FCR PT,ELIMINARY APRIL 1. 1979• POPULATION ESTIMATE
IUkEAU LF ECCNCMIC ANC DJ5IN_SS RESEARCH
JJIVEP SITY OF FLCRI
OA
"I MATH ERLY hALL
."INESVILLE. FL. 32611
1970 HOUSING UNITS= 7644. 1970 HOUSEHOLDS. 707A. 1970 POP. IN UNITS= 22227.
1970 OCCUPANCY RATC 0.93`_ 1970 PCP. PFR UNIT 3.142
TIME SERIES DATA
1970 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 3977 1978 1979 1980
POPUL.ATI CN 22362. 23188. 26489. 27276. 28178. 277C4. 30414. 32043.
OIFFERl NCE 826. 3301. 787. 902. -394. 2530. 1629.
ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS 7677. 8770. 9663. 10286. 10749. 10702. 11849. 12971. 14212.
O 3FFFRENCE 1093. 893. 623. - 463. -47. 1147. 1122. 1241.
APRIL CUSTOMERS 0. O. 0. 0. 0. 0. O. O. 14505.
DIFFERENCE 0. 0. O. 0. 0. 0. O. 0.
INOATES 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 10. 277 279. 201.
CIFFERLNCE 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2C7.. 2 2.
!LTTE- ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS AREACTIVE RESICENTIAL CUSTCMERS FOR JULY I OF THE YEAR NOTED.
APRIL CUSTCP.EkS ARE ACTIVE RE S(DENTIAL CUSTOIdEkS FOR APRIL 1 OF THE YCAR NOTED.-
1RCUP CUARTERS MVLTIPLIER(1970 EASE)- 1.00007
1970 RATIO OF IOUSFHLLOS TO _LECTRIC CUSTOMERS= 0.92145
-WILDING PERPITS
'.F W MH TOTAL
7U-79 3033. 1704. 0. 4737.
tDITS 111. 16. 0. 127.
•BTAL 2922. 1688. O. 4610.
1970 UNITS - 7644.
CURRENT INVE7ITGRY 12254. _
"OTE- ECITS INC LUCE ALL SUDTRACTIO NS FR C4 THE INVENTCRY.
TH_Y AI.E 4AII.LY CA I.CELEO P=RMtT] A..D DF .•iL IT iF`1..
CCC. FATE FCR -C Tit= HONES = 1.0 BECAUSE CENSUS COUNT_D CNLY
PERMAN..TLY OCCUPI_D MGBILE HC4E U41T5.
NOV 2 11979
23
80dK 42 RAGE 120,
I
NOV 2 11979
BOOK 42 PACE 121
31 99
I"DIAN RIVER CC
LATA SUV✓ArY FGR Pf: ELINIVARY APRIL 1. 1979. POPULATIO•.1 ESTIMATE
ItJ REA,J Cr ECC•tCM 1C A•tD 3US III_SS R. SEA:CN
1/•.l VL R'_I TY OF rLCMIDA
221 -AT Nr RLY HALL
GAINESVILLE. rL. 32611
1970 )ICUSING UNITS- 13779. 1970 HCUSEHOLDS- 12325. 1970 POP.
IN UNITS=
35715.
1979 OCCLOANCY RATE 0.804 1971 POP. PER JNIT 2.b98
'.EDIAN AC- (970= 34.5 65 -IN 1970= 6251. PERCENT
65• IN 1970=
17.4
OL ACKS 1.; C! 6514. PERCENT CLACK 1970= 1e.1
TI✓E SERIES CATA
1970 1972 1973 1974 1975
1976 1977
1978
1979 1980
'FCPUL AT I ON 35992. 39108. 43303. 45070. 46254. 461E0.
49706.
52333.
CIFF ERC VCE 3116. 4275• 1655. 1216.
-70. 3S22.
2627.
-ECIC ARE ENRC_LEF.S 6259. 7381. 7730. 8102. 8553.
7149. 9922.
10802.
C1FFLkE!KE 1122. 349. 372. 451.
596. 773.
880.
ELECTRIC CUSTC'JERS 13550. 15877. 17556. 18836. 19471. 20050.
21936.
23431.
25573.
CIFF'-RE"<_ 2327. 1679. (20R. 635.
587. 1878.
1495.
2142.
APRIL CUSTf.M.RS 0. O. O. O. O.
O. 0.
23454.
25989.
C IFF En t(. O. 0. O. O.
O. O.
O.
2535.
Ih MATE" 0. 0. O. O. O.
10. 277.
279.
281.
CIF FrREltt:E 0. 0. 0. O.
0. 267.
2.
2.
SCF CCL E!IRf LLM ENT 6193. 6274. 6479. 6419. 6229.
6033. 6200.
CIF 'r F.R'tx= 8l. 2CS. -60. -190.
-196. 167.
DIRTrS 570. 561. 608. 500. 544.
584. 642.
688.
DIFFERENCE -9. 47. -28. -36.
40. 58.
46.
DEATHS 417. 491. 571. 5S3. 542.
550. S48.
593.
D[FF[RE NCE 74. 80. -ID. -11.
8. -2.
45.
%CTE- ELECTRIC CUSTCML'RS ARE ACTIVE F.ES IDE.CUSTOMERS FOR JULY 1 OF THS
YEAR NOTED.
APRIL CUST!+t,�e.r5 A = ACTIVE RE SIOENTIAL CUSTOMERS FOR APRIL l OF THE Y$AN
NOTED.
SCHCCL-'IRLLLMZNT' INCLUDES GRADCS 1-0. PUSLIC AND PRIVATE.
II1kTN',i ANG CCATHS ARE FCR CALENDAR YE AfIS.
GROUP CUARTERS 4ULTIPLIE4(1970 DASEI= 1.00776
1970 RATIO OF HJ•JSCHCLDS TO LLECTRIC CUSTOMERS. 0.90959
UNIT 1970 1970 DCC. POP. IN 1970 PERMITS TOTAL
CURRENT
TYPE LhITS CCC.UNI TS RATE UNITS PPJ 7079 EDITS CHANGE
IN VE44TORY
Sr 10813. 9x07. 0.916 30202. 3.048 4620. 260. 4340.
15153.
✓F .118. 1580. 0.746 3202. 2.026 4474. 20. 4450.
6572.
MH .38. 030. 1. C00 2000. 2.386 8l. 0. 81.
i
919.
TOTAL 13769. 12325. 0.895 35400. 2.872 9175. 300. 8875.
22644.
N3TE- EDITS INCLLIE ALL SUBTRACTIONS FROM TME"W ENTORY.
TiEY ArE NA['JLY CA*:CELLED PEkMITS AND DE MOLITIOtIS.
CCC. RATE FCR M[CILr. I•C MES = 1.0 DECAUSE CcHSUS COUNTED ONLY
P[RrA.i(t.T LY OCCUPIEDt'C DI LE HOME UNITS.
'
I� 1970 UNITS HELD FCR CCCASIONAL USE= 386. 2.80 PERCENT 3F ALL YEAR ROUND
'
WITS
I
1970 TCTAL UNITS - ALL Y_AR-NCUf.D Ut11TS ♦ SEASCNAL UNITS= 14111.
1970 SEASCNAL UNITS= 33... CR 2.35 PERCENT CF TCTAL UNITS.
PLANNER REVER STATED THAT HE REVIEWED THE MATERIAL
AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THOSE FIGURES. HE CONTINUED
THAT THE FEDERAL CENSUS IS GOING TO BE DONE EVERY FIVE YEARS NOW
INSTEAD OF TEN YEARS, AND THE NEW CENSUS IS DUE IN APRIL OF 1980.
PLANNER REVER FELT WE SHOULD BE AWARE AND FOLLOW UP ON THE NEW
CENSUS DUE TO STATE REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FOR THE COUNTY. HE
RECOMMENDED THAT THESE FIGURES BE ACCEPTED NOW AND LET THE CENSUS
OF 1980 BEAR US OUT FOR THE REAL POPULATION FIGURES.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THE COMMISSION NEEDS TO HAVE MORE
INFORMATION REGARDING THE CENSUS TAKING. HE CONTINUED THE CENSUS
IS GOING TO BE TAKEN THROUGH THE MAIL AND EACH RESIDENT WILL HAVE -
TO FILL OUT THEIR FORMS. THE CHAIRMAN FELT THIS MIGHT BE A
PROBLEM AS THERE WILL BE SOME PEOPLE NOT WILLING TO FILL OUT THEIR
FORMS.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON COMMENTED THAT SO MANY THINGS
IN_THE COUNTY ARE BASED ON THIS CENSUS AND WE WILL BE LIVING WITH
IT FOR FIVE YEARS. HE THOUGHT'IT WAS A -GOOD IDEA TO LOOK INTO
IT FURTHER AND TO HELP INFORM ALL THE PEOPLE IN THE COUNTY TO HELP
_I
GET THE BEST CENSUS THAT WE CAN BECAUSE IT MEANS MORE DOLLARS TO
THE COUNTY. ISR. BARTON STATED THAT ONE OUT OF FIVE PEOPLE WILL
BE GETTING THE LONG FORM OF CENSUS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT POSTERS AND ADVERTISING AND
HOW THE PUBLIC CAN BE EDUCATED ABOUT THE CENSUS.
PLANNER REVER SUGGESTED THAT THE MATERIAL CONCERNING
THE CENSUS BE STUDIED FURTHER SO THAT IT CAN BE DISCUSSED LATER
IN GREATER DETAIL.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ANNOUNCED THAT THE- ITEM CONCERNING THE
SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTER WAS BEING WITHDRAWN FROM TODAY'S
AGENDA,
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT THE:BOARD GIVE
PERMISSION, IN THE EVENT IT BECOMES NECESSARY, TO EMPLOY A SURVEYOR
TO WORK ON THE SUPERIMPOSING OF THE FOOTBALL FIELD PORTION ON THE
PROPERTY IN QUESTION.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMIS -
SIGNER LOY, AUTHORIZING THE HIRING OF A SURVEYOR, IF NECESSARY, TO
WORK.ON THE SURVEYING AT THE SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTER.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT HE HAD A LEGAL DESCRIPTION
IN THE LEASE FOR THE SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTER, BUT NOT A
DESCRIPTION FOR THE FOOTBALL FIELD.
COMMISSIONER LOY FELT THE BOARD SHOULD KNOW FOR SURE
WHAT IS COUNTY PROPERTY.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT EVERYTHING HAD BEEN
SURVEYED ACCORDING TO THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON
AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NEXT DISCUSSED THE BID
FOR A BACKHOE AND FRONT LOADER, AS MENTIONED IN THE FOLLOWING
MEMORANDUM DATED NOVEMBER 19, 1979;
NOV 211979 $ ` 25 42 *&E1?2
__
NOV 211979 600K
November 19,'1979
From: Chairman, Bid Committee
To: Board of County Commissioners, Indian River County
Subj: Backhoe & Front Loader, (IRC Bid # 37)
42 PAcE1.2-3.
1. A public meeting was held at 2:00 PM, November 8, 1979 in room 115 at 2145
14th Ave., Vero Beach, Flo-ida. This meeting was so published on October 26,
1979 in the Vero Beach Press Journal.
2. The following were present:
Mr. N. Nelson, Chairman
Mr. J. Flint, Member
Mr. R. Donlon, Member
Mr. G. Hamilton, Supr. of R&B
Mr. J. Flynn, Director, Material Management
Mr. D. McBride, Kelly Tractor Co.
Mr. T. Thomas, Sunrise Ford Tractor Co.
3. Bid # 37 was opened and recorded. The Bid Committee recommends the Board award
this bid to the Kelly Tractor Co., West Palm Beach, Fla. The low bid was submitted
by Sunrise Tractor Co., Ft. Pierce, Fla. This bid did not meet specifications for
the following reasons:
Bid Specified the JCB Model 3D or equal.
Specified- Net HP of 79 Sunrise Tractor -55 Net HP
- 4 Cylinders -3 Cylinders
-6500 lb lift cap. -4700 lb
-Reach of 20' 8 " -18' 11"
-Loader Bucket - 1-5/8 -1 CuYd.
CuYd.
-Jaw Bucket -N/A
-Backhoe Bucket - 10 -6.5 Cat.
CuFt.
-Overall weight - 16440 -13750
NEIL NELSON
Chairman
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE SPECIFICATIONS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE
BID COMMITTEE FOR BID 37 AND AWARDED THE BID TO KELLY TRACTOR
COMPANY OF WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA IN THE AMOUNT OF $33,835.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE KONTOULAS NEXT
DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD THE PRELIMINARY REPORT ON CONSTRUCTION
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. HE
STATED THAT HE REVIEWED THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND HAS
48 PAGES OF COMMENTS CONCERNING THEM.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
MR. SINGH IS DUE TO ARRIVE SOON AND ISR. KONTOULAS COULD GO OVER
THE COMMENTS WITH HIM AND RETURN TO THE MEETING AT 3:00 O'CLOCK
P.M. TO GIVE A SUMMATION.
MR. KONTOULAS STRESSED THE TIME ELEMENT AND SAID THE
CONSULTANTS HAVE ABOUT A WEEK OR SO TO GO OVER HIS COMMENTS AND
MAKE CORRECTIONS. HE BRIEFLY GAVE SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF HIS
CONCERN; SUCH AS: AtKING THE OWNERS' REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE
JOB DRAWINGS; FINDING SEVERAL AREAS OF REPETITION IN THE TWO
PROJECTS; FINDING 50 PAGES OF SPECIFICATIONS OF CHILLERS AND
BOILERS THAT DO NOT BELONG IN THE COURTHOUSE PROJECT; SELECTING
COLORS OF CERAMIC TILE AND PANELING; AND BEING TOLD TO STOP
SALVAGING ANY COPPER FROM THE PROJECT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD BE WILLING
TO ACCEPT MR. KONTOULAS' EVALUATION OF THE SUBJECT.
MR. KONTOULAS NOTED THAT IT WOULD PROBABLY UPSET THE
ARCHITECTS WHEN THEY SEE THE 48 PAGES OF COMMENTS, BUT THE MAIN
THING IS THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO HOLD TO THE SCHEDULE PROCEDURE.
HE THEN DISCUSSED WHETHER OR NOT THERE SHOULD BE ONE OR TWO
PROJECTS. MR. KONTOULAS DOES SEE SOME COMPLICATIONS BECAUSE IN
THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE OWNERS' REPRESENTATIVE IS SUPPOSED TO
COORDINATE ALL WORK. THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH HAVING TO MOVE
SEVERAL DEPARTMENTS IN ORDER TO START WORKING UPSTAIRS IN THE
COURTHOUSE.
!DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE COUNTY
WOULD HAVE TO FIND SOME WAY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE
TO BE MOVED.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT IT SHOULD BE MADE
KNOWN TO THE BIDDERS THAT WE WILL BE UNABLE TO MOVE FROM THE
COURTHOUSE UNTIL IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE, BECAUSE THERE IS
NO OTHER PLACE FOR THESE OFFICES TO GO. HE CONTINUED THAT WHETHER
IT IS ONE OR TWO CONTRACTS, WE CANNOT MOVE OUT UNTIL THE OTHER
BUILDING IS READY.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY CHANCE THAT
WE COULD USE SOME TURN -AROUND SPACE IN THE HOSPITAL FOR THE PEOPLE
THAT HAVE TO BE MOVED OUT OF THE COURTHOUSE.
NOV 211979 27 Book p4a,1241-
NOV 211979 BOOK 42 PAGE 125
MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT THERE IS SPACE ON THE SECOND
FLOOR AT THE HOSPITAL THAT CAN BE USED. HE POINTED OUT THAT WHEN
WE MOVE OUT TO THE HOSPITAL AND ARE SUBSTANTIALLY NEAR COMPLETION,
WE ARE THEN ON A PUNCH LIST CORRECTION.
DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT THE LIABILITY ASPECT FOR THE
CONTRACTOR AND ARCHITECT.
MR. KONTOULAS FELT A SCHEDULE OF PREFERRED AREAS COULD
BE WORKED OUT FOR THOSE EMPLOYEES THAT WOULD BE MOVED.
THE BOARD SUGGESTED USING SUCH PLACES AS CITY HALL,
THE COMMUNITY THEATER, OR ONE FLOOR IN THE GULF -WESTERN BUILDING;
AND DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT POSSIBLY RENTING SPACE,
MR. KONTOULAS WANTED THE BOARD TO BE AWARE OF THE PROBLEMS
ON WHETHER TO HAVE ONE BID, TWO BIDS, OR COMBINED BIDS FOR THE
PROJECTS. HE FELT THE COMBINED BID MIGHT BE AN ADVANTAGE, BUT
THE PROBLEM STILL RESTS THAT NOTHING CAN BE DONE IN THE COURTHOUSE
UNTIL THE PEOPLE ARE MOVED OUT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS WONDERED IF.THE SHERIFF COULD CONSOLIDATE
HIS OPERATIONS AT THE JAIL FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME AND MR.
KONTOULAS-ANSWERED AFFIRMATIVELY.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS OFFERED THE SPACE IN THE ROAD
AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT TO BE USED IF NEEDED, AS THEIR CABINETS
WOULD BE EASY TO MOVE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, VARIOUS SUGGESTIONS WERE OFFERED,
AND IT WAS DECIDED TO CONTINUE THE SUBJECT LATER THIS AFTERNOON
WHEN MR, SINGH WOULD BE PRESENT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD RAYMOND
A. .JACKSON'S LAWSUIT AGAINST THE COUNTY AND DER. HE COMMENTED
THAT THEY ARE AT THE STAGE WHERE AN OBJECTION HAS BEEN FILED BY
MR. .JACKSON REGARDING THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BY THE DER FOR A
SEWER PLANT IN GIFFORD. THE ATTORNEY SAID THAT A HEARING OFFICER
HAS BEEN APPOINTED AND IS TO SET A HEARING DATE. HE CONTINUED
THAT SHERMAN SMITH IS REPRESENTING .JACKSON AND THEY HAVE AGREED
ON SEVERAL HEARING DATES, NEITHER OF WHICH ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE
HEARING OFFICER. THE ATTORNEY SAID THAT, IN THE MEANTIME, HE
HAS SUGGESTED TO ATTORNEY SMITH TO GET WITH HI'S CLIENT TO FIND
OUT WHAT HIS OBJECTIONS ARE AND TRY TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEMS
INTERNALLY. HE REPORTED.THAT THEIR BIGGEST OBJECTION IS THE
VIRAL AFFECT THE PLANT WILL HAVE ON THE AREA - AIRBORNE VIRUSES.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO
REPRESENT THE COUNTY'AND USE COUNTY ENGINEERING TO TRY TO RESOLVE
ANY PROBLEMS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT ADVISED THE BOARD THAT A RESOLUTION
HAS BEEN PREPARED REGARDING THE HOSPITAL BOND ISSUE AND SUGGESTED
WAITING UNTIL THIS AFTERNOON AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M. TO DISCUSS IT
FURTHER WITH MR. SINGH.
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE PERSONNEL SURVEY, AS PER THE
FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM AND ATTACHMENTS:
November 14: 19.79.
MEMORANDIRI
TO: Jack G. -Jennings, County Administrator
FROM: Robert Donlon, Personnel Director
It is my recommendation that Cody & Associates be
retained to perform the survey as outlined in their proposal.
They have been more than satisfactory in their recently completed
study for Indian River County. This study will be a continuation
of the Classification and Pay Plan we have recently adopted.
In addition to the items covered in their proposal, they
have agreed to include an Affirmative Action Plan at no additional
cost to the County.
The funds for this study are included in the Personnel
budget for this year.
NOV 211979 29 c
NOV 2 11979
600K 42'
PAGE 127
of a',y& 7q � oc!a F_iJ, _
12C.
NIANAGEh1ENT CONSULTANTS
MAIN OFFICE BRANCH OFFICE
2928 Franklin St. 305 Jack Drive
Lakeland, Fla. 33801 Cocoa Beach, Fla. 32931
(813) 686-8594 (305) 783-3720
November 8, 1979.
Mr. J. G. Jennings
County Administrator
Indian River County
Vero Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Jennings:
We are writing to submit a proposal to develop a County Per-
formance Evaluation system, up -date and survey personnel rules,
regulations and employee benefits and -develop an employee
personnel manual.
Since we have completed work recently for Indian River County
we are in a position to perform this study without expensive
orientation time that is usually needed.
Because of our experience"in designing similar plans for Florida
governments and our knowledge of your local and regional labor
market, we feel quite qualified to perform this project. We
are known as a company which provides a personalized consulting
service and will design a plan around the needs of the County.
Sincerely,
N. E. Pelle-- o
PROPOSAL
Cody & Associates, Inc. proposes to provide consultant service
to Indian River County which would include:
I. OBJECTIVES AND GOALS
A. Personnel Rules and Regulations
The Rules provide for establishing orderly procedures and
guidelines in administering the entire personnel system
in some of the following areas:
1. Just and equitable incentives (benefits) and conditions
of employment to promote efficiency and economy in the
operation of the County's growth.
2. Recruiting, selecting, and advancing employees.
3. Protection of employees against coercion for partisan
political purposes.
4. Training employees as needed, to assure high quality
performance, encourage careers with the County.
5. Fair treatment of applicants and employees in all
aspects of Personnel Administration.
6. System and procedures for carrying out the personnel
program establishing lives and channels of reporting,
communicating and progress.
7. Grievance procedure for all employees.
8. And other personnel areas.
B. Employee Personnel Manual ,
1. Provides in easily understandable terms what their
personnel program is and what benefits and working
conditions they enjoy and/or must adhere to.
C.•Performance Evaluation System
1. Provides a system where each employee knows how they
are progressing and organizations know what areas
and employees need attention and help.
2. Provides a basis for a wage and salary program based
upon performance.
3. Improves motivation, through recognition.
4. Train the Rater's in using the system.
II.WORK ELEMEUTS
A. Design Personnel Rules and Requlations
1. Study the existing personnel system, charter work rules
and regulations, and other applicable rules and regula-
tions.
2 Review imput from Management and supervisors group
memberrs concerning needs,, etc.
3. Design Personnel Rules and Regulations.
4. Submit first (1st) draft for review, feedback and
recommendations.
5. Re -design and draft final rules and regulations.
6. Submit final draft for adoption and implementation.
7. Final printing and orientation phase of the rules
and regulations.
B. Performance Evaluation System Design
1. Analyze the present policies concerning advancement,
probation, and etc., that would be involved with per-
formance. Study organization structure and future
plans.
2. Design performance system to meet the needs as described.
3. Draft final recommended system.
4. After implementation, provide orientation and explana-
tion of system.
C. Employee Personnel Manual
1. After the Personnel Rules and Regulations are designed
and adopted, design a draft of an employees handbook
which will cover all conditions of the individuals
employment.
NOV 2 1 1979
31 Boos 42 PacE 12$
NOV 211979 BOOK 42 PAGE 129
LENGTH OF THE STUDY
We estimate that the total elapsed time require to complete
this project would be a maximum of three (3) months. We are
prepared to begin at a mutually agreeable time.
COST OF THE STUDY
The cost of this study would be Four Thousand Five Hundred
Dollars ($4,500.00) which includes all fees and expenses for
the project. .
Sincerely,
N. E. Pellegr'
CLIENT LIST
CODY & ASSOCIATES. INC.
` COLLEGES & SCHOOL BOARDS
ALACHUA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
BAKER SCHOOL BOARD
BREVARD SCHOOL BOARD
DADE SCHOOL BOARD
DAYTONA BEACH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
rDI SON COMiMIP11ITY COLLEGE
ESCAMBIA SCHOOL BOARD
HIGHLAtdDS SCHOOL BOARD
HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
LEON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
INDIAN RIVER SCHOOL BOARD'
ORANGE SCHOOL BOARD
PINELLAS SCHOOL BOARD
POLK COMMUNITY COLLEGE
POLK SCHOOL BOARD
SARASOTA SCHOOL BOARD
SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
ST. JOHNS RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA
OTHER
BREVARD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF
CENTER, INC. FLORIDA, INC.
BREVARD COUNTY SHERIFF ORANGE COUNTY COMPTROLLER
COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF
EAST VOLUSIA MOSQUITO CONTROL PALMER NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST
DISTRICT COMPANY OF SARASOTA
FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER
JESS P ARRISH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LEE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS TAMPA HOUSING AUTHORITY
M=-DADE WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY' VILLA MARIA NURSING HOME
Attachment 32 March 1979
CITY GOVERNMENTS
BELLE GLADE
HAINES CITY
NAPLES
BLOUNTSTOWN
HALLANDALE
NEW PORT RICHEY,*
BOCA RATON
HOLLY HILL
NEW SMYRNA BEACH
CAPE CANAVERAL
HOLLYWOOD
PEMBROKE PINES
CHATTAHOOCHEE
INDIAN HARBOR BEACH
PLAINTATION
CLEARWATER
JACKSONVILLE BEACH
POMPANO BEACH
CLERMONT
KISSIMMEE
PUNTA GORDA
COCOA
LAKELAND
QUINCY
COCOA BEACH
LAKE WALES
RIVIERA BEACH
CORAL SPRINGS
LAKE WORTH
ROCKLEDGE
DANIA
LARGO
ST. CLOUD
DAYTONA BEACH SHORES
LAUDERHILL
SANFORD
DEERFIELD BEACH
LONGBOAT KEY
SANIBEL
DELAND
LYNN HAVEN
SARASOTA
DUNEDIN
MAITLAND
SATELLITE BEACH
EUSTIS
MELBOURNE
TALLAHASSEE
FERNANDINA BEACH
MIAMI SHORES
TAMPA
FORT LAUDERDALE
MIAMI SPRINGS
TEMPLE TERRACE
FORT MEADE
MILTON
TITUSVILLE
FORT PIERCE
MOUNT DORA
TREASURE ISLAND
GAINESVILLE
MULBERRY
WINTER PARK
GULFPORT
VERO BEACH
COUNTY GOVERNMENTS
ALACHUA
GADSDEN LEE
PASCO
BREVARD
GLADES
MONROE
PINELLAS
BROWARD
HARDEE
ORANGE
POLK
COLLIER
HILLSBOROUGH OSCEOLA
SANTA ROSA
DESOTO
INDIAN
RIVER PALM BEACH
SEMINOLE
ESCAMBIA
LAKE
VOLUSIA
` COLLEGES & SCHOOL BOARDS
ALACHUA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
BAKER SCHOOL BOARD
BREVARD SCHOOL BOARD
DADE SCHOOL BOARD
DAYTONA BEACH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
rDI SON COMiMIP11ITY COLLEGE
ESCAMBIA SCHOOL BOARD
HIGHLAtdDS SCHOOL BOARD
HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
LEON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
INDIAN RIVER SCHOOL BOARD'
ORANGE SCHOOL BOARD
PINELLAS SCHOOL BOARD
POLK COMMUNITY COLLEGE
POLK SCHOOL BOARD
SARASOTA SCHOOL BOARD
SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
ST. JOHNS RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA
OTHER
BREVARD COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF
CENTER, INC. FLORIDA, INC.
BREVARD COUNTY SHERIFF ORANGE COUNTY COMPTROLLER
COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF
EAST VOLUSIA MOSQUITO CONTROL PALMER NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST
DISTRICT COMPANY OF SARASOTA
FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER
JESS P ARRISH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LEE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS TAMPA HOUSING AUTHORITY
M=-DADE WATER & SEWER AUTHORITY' VILLA MARIA NURSING HOME
Attachment 32 March 1979
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY GRANT MONEY
AVAILABLE TO DO THIS WORK AND PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DONLON REPLIED
NEGATIVELY. COMMISSIONER LYONS WONDERED IF THERE WAS ANY CHANCE
THAT THE COUNTY COULD CONSOLIDATE WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
FOR SUCH A STUDY.
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DONLON STATED THAT THIS HAD NOT BEEN
CONSIDERED.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED IF THE SAME SERVICE WOULD BE
AVAILABLE TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND BE INCLUDED IN THE FEE.
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DONLON STATED THAT HE COULDN'T ANSWER
THAT, BUT THERE WAS NO REASON WHY SOME OF THE OTHER OFFICERS
COULDNIT ADOPT OUR RULES.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF OUR PERSONNEL RULES AND
REGULATIONS NEEDED REVIEW.
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DONLON ANSWERED AFFIRMATIVELY AND
STATED THAT THE COUNTY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL GUIDE-
LINES AT THE PRESENT TIME, AND NOW WITH THE EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
MATTER, YOU MUST HAVE A LEGAL DOCUMENT, AND AN EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK.
HE CONTINUED THAT OVER THE YEARS, THINGS HAVE BEEN MORE COMPLICATED.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THERE MIGHT BE A PROBLEM
COMBINING OUR STUDY WITH THE ONE PLANNED FOR THE CITY OF VERO
BEACH.
COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT WHAT BOTHERED HIM IS
THAT STUDIES ARE DONE BUT SO MANY TIMES ALL THE INFORMATION GETS
PUT INTO A BOOK AND NOTHING IS DONE WITH IT.
COMMISSIONER LOY FELT IT IS REALLY A MATTER OF PROTECTING
OURSELVES.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT ENFORCING THE NEW RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER LOY, THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR, AS OUTLINED IN HIS MEMORANDUM OF NOVEMBER
14, 1979,
el NOV 2 11979 33 ���� ��� �.
Fl -
N OV 211979
Boa 42 PACF.131
CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A
PROPOSED CONTRACT DRAWN UP FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD, AND
WOULD LIKE TO BE SURE THAT THE FINAL RESULTS OF THIS STUDY ARE
INCLUDED, AND THAT WE HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL THE STATE REGULATIONS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON
AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
THE BOARD THEN ADJOURNED AT 12:00 O'CLOCK NOON AND
RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT BROUGHT BEFORE THE BOARD A
REQUEST FROM DER REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF VISTA PROPERTIES.
HE EXPLAINED THAT THE STATUTES PLACES PART OF THE BURDEN ON
FILLING IN MARSH AREAS ON THE BOARD AND APPROVAL IS NEEDED BEFORE
THE PROJECT CAN GO AHEAD. THE ATTORNEY SAID THAT PRIOR TO THE
BOARD'S APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT MUST GO THROUGH THE DER AND GO
THROUGH A BIOLOGICAL STUDY; THESE DOCUMENTS MUST BE HAD BEFORE
THE BOARD CAN PROCEED WITH THE REQUEST. HE NOTED THAT THE PRIME
PURPOSE IS, PRIOR TO WETLANDS BEING FILLED, DAMAGED OR CHANGED,
IS THAT INPUT FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS NEEDED. THE ATTORNEY
ADVISED THE BOARD'S DECISION WOULD BE BASED HEAVILY ON WHAT THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS.
DAVID MARSH, SENIOR PLANNER, COMMENTED THAT THEY DID
LOOK OVER THE APPLICATION, TALKED WITH THE APPLICANT, AND THE
DER. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE IS SOME ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE
WHICH.INDICATED THAT THE DER HAD COME TO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE
APPLICANT ON THE TWO SMALL AREAS WHERE THE DER WAS CONCERNED WAS
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE - THOSE AREAS WILL NOT BE FILLED.
MR. MARSH COMMENTED THAT THEY DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON THAT BASIS,
AND THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO COMPLY WITH THOSE REQUESTS REGARDING
THE TWO SMALL SLOUGHS.
COMMISSIONER LYONS INTERJECTED THAT THE AREA IS NOT
PROPERLY DEFINED IN THE LETTER FROM THE DER AND WHAT THE BOARD
IS ASKED TO APPROVE IS NOT MENTIONED. HE SUGGESTED THAT THIS
BE CONTINUED UNTIL WE RECEIVE THE FINAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
THAT IS INVOLVED.
w
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT SINCE
THE LETTER FROM DER GIVING THE PARTICULARS NEEDED FOR APPROVAL
IS TO BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES, THE BOARD SHOULD BE FURNISHED
A NEW LETTER WITH THE CORRECT INFORMATION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER
UNTIL AFTER AN UP-TO-DATE LETTER IS RECEIVED*FROM THE DER ON
THIS,MATTER.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER NOTED THAT HIS DEPARTMENT WOULD
PURSUE OBTAINING THE LETTER NECESSARY FROM THE DER,
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT IT WAS CALLED TO HER
ATTENTION THAT THE BOARD NEEDED TO ADOPT A MOTION ACCEPTING THE
POPULATION FIGURES FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO HAVE THE COUNTY ACCEPT
THE POPULATION FIGURES SUBMITTED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
FOR THE COMING FISCAL YEAR, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN ANY
NECESSARY DOCUMENTS,
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT AN ADDITION SHOULD BE MADE
TO A MOTION MADE ON AUGUST 22, 1979 REGARDING, THE CONSTRUCTION OF
BARBER AVENUE,FOR CLARIFICATION. SHE SUGGESTED ADDING, "AID
AUTHORIZED THE EXECUTION. OF ALL VOUCHERS FOR PAYMENT OF THE
CONTRACT; �� AND THE FOLLOWING IS THE ENTIRE MOTION IN ITS AMENDED
FORM:
"On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner
Siebert, the Board unanimously authorized Intergovernmental
Coordinator Thomas to proceed with steps to obtain Secondary
Road Funds for the construction of Barber Avenue; authorized
the Chairman or Vice Chairman to sign the application to the
State subject to approval of the Attorney; and agreed that
authorized personnel and officials be empowered to execute
all subsequent vouchers to obtain funding for the construction
of Barber Avenue up to the maximum of $336,143.79; and authorized
the execution of all vouchers for paiment of the contract; plus
other contracted items associated with the construction of
Barber Avenue. r/
NOV 211979 35 floc42k"CE2
r
NOV 211979
BOOK FAUf
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADDING "AND AUTHORIZED
THE EXECUTION OF ALL VOUCHERS FOR PAYMENT OF THE CONTRACT;if TO THE
MOTION MADE ON AUGUST 22, 1979 REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF BARBER
AVENUE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS NEXT SUGGESTED THE POSSIBILITY OF
A TREE PROTECTION ORDINANCE AND ASKED THE BOARDS PERMISSION TO
GET IT STARTED THROUGH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. HE CONTINUED THAT
HE KNEW THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WAS BUSY BUT HE FELT HE COULD
DELIVER TO THEM A PRETTY NEARLY COMPLETED PRODUCT.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE HAD NO OBJECTION.
ATTORNEY COLLINS THOUGHT THE TYPE OF TREES THEY ARE
TRYING TO PROTECT SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED.
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED WE DO NOT PROTECT PEPPER
TREES AND MELALEUCA TREES.
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THAT THE COUNTY HAD ENOUGH LOCAL
EXPERIENCE TO WORK OUT A PRACTICAL ORDINANCE WITH'A LITTLE AMOUNT
OF WORK FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
COMMISSIONER LYONS NEXT ANNOUNED THAT HE MET WITH THE
TAC COMMITTEE ON THE COMMON DRAINAGE PROBLEM WITH THE CITY, AND
HE LOOKED AT SOME OF THE PROPOSALS FROM THE ENGINEERS. HE HOPED
BY NEXT WEEK THEY WOULD COME UP WITH A RECOMMENDATION.
COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED TO THE BOARD THAT HE HAS
BEEN VERY INTERESTED IN SEEING THAT FLORIDA LIVING CARE FINDS A
WAY TO BUILD A NURSING HOME. HE CONTINUED THAT AT THE OCTOBER LOTH
MEETING, A MOTION WAS MADE TO GRANT AN ALLOCATION OF 10,000 GPD
FROM THE 100,000 GALLONS FROM THE HOSPITALS PREVIOUS'ALLOCATION.
COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE BOARD INSTRUCT
THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT T0, CONNECT, UPON REQUEST, WATER TO THE
FLORIDA LIVING CARE FROM THE WATER LINE THERE, AND HONOR THEIR
REQUEST UNTIL WE GET STRAIGHTENED OUT WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH.
HE FELT THAT THIS COUNTY NEEDS THE ADDITIONAL NURSING HOME AND
WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE COUNTY TAKE THAT POSITION.
i
COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THE BOARD HAS ESTABLISHED
THAT THIS IS A PRIORITY PROJECT.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THERE IS AVAILABILITY. HE
STATED THE NURSING HOME IS GOING TO HAVE TO INCUR THE EXPENSE,
WHICH WOULD INCLUDE A METER. THE ATTORNEY SAID THEY WOULD BE A
WHOLESALE CUSTOMER JUST LIKE ANY OF THE OTHER GIFFORD RESIDENTS,
AND -THE COUNTY WOULD BILL THEM.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE WONDERED IF OUR AGREEMENT WITH RALMAR
WOULD ALLOW US TO PROCEED IN THIS MANNER,
ATTORNEY COLLINS SAID HE WOULD LOOK INTO IT; RALMAR IS
A CITY CUSTOMER, BUT WE DO HAVE RIGHTS UNDER THE CONTRACT. HE
CONTINUED THAT WHEN WE DO TAKE OVER THE HOSPITAL,IT WILL BE WITH
WHATEVER THE CITY NOW HAS. ATTORNEY COLLINS SAID HIS UNDERSTANDING
IS THAT THIS 100,000 GALLONS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION IN
THE GIFFORD AREA DURING THE INTERIM PERIOD, AND ANY ACTION ON THE
10,000 GPD NOW DOES NOT TAKE AWAY FROM EXISTING COMMITMENTS.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT COMMISSIONER
LYONS WOULD WORK ON PUTTING TOGETHER SOMETHING TO ENABLE FLORIDA
LIVING CARE TO TAP IN THE 10,000 GPD.
THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO -WIT:
NOV 21-1979
37 Banc42 .3 ; .
NOV 211979
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
%1 i
1
in the Court, was pub-
fished in said newspaper in the issues of �e. o� �. 127 9
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. -j 9.79
(Business Manager)
(BEAU (Clerk of the Circuit Court, I i di )n River County, Florida)
gooK 42 PAGE 135
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN* that the
Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian
River County, Florida, has tentatively app-
roved the following changes and additions to
the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County,
Florida, which changes and additions are
substantially as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property situated
east of U.S. Hwy. 1 on the Indian River app-
roximately 650'' north of Hobart Road (77th
Street)In Indian River County, Florida, to wit:.
The east 249.88 feet of Tract "B", Hobart
Landing Unit Two, as recorded in the Public
Records of Indian River County, Florida, Plat
Book 1, page 46, AND that portion of the land
mass east- of and *adjacent to -said Tract "B".
extending into the Indian River as reflected on
the Indian Rlyer County Property Appraiser's
Map of Section 34, Township 31 South, Range 39
East as revised January 1,'1973
Be changed from R-3 Multiple dwelling
district to R-1 single family district.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which ;
parties in interest and citizens shall have an '
opportunity to be heard, will be field by said
Planning and Zoning Commission in the County
Commission Room, Indian River County
Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on. Thurs-
day, October 11, 1979, at 7:30 P.M., after which
said public hearing in relation thereto at which
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard will be held by the
Board ,od County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, in the County Com.
mission Room, Indian.. River County
Courthouse, Vero ,Beach, Florida, on Wed-
nesday, November 21, 1979, at 2:00 P.M.
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
By: William C. Wodtke, Jr.
Chairman
Sept. 26, 28, 1979.
THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WAS SENT TO FRED P. BRIGGS,
DISTRICT MANAGER, HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY, BY THE CLERK OF THE
CIRCUIT COURT PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66.
9
FRE®A WRIGHT
CLERK. CIRCUIT COURT AND RECORDER
P. 0. BOX 1028
VER O BEACH - FLORIDA
32960
October 15, 1979
Mr. Fred P. Briggs, District Manager
Hobart Brothers Company
P. 0. Box 1600
Vero Beach,*Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Briggs:
In compliance with Florida Statute 125.66, the following is
a Notice of Public Hearing for rezoning, as requested by the
Board of County Commissioners:
NOTICE
The Zoning Map will be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit:
The East 249.88 feet of Tract "B", Hobart Landing
Unit Two, as recorded in the Public Records of Indian
River County, Florida, Plat Book 1, page 46, AND
that portion of the land mass east of and adjacent to
said Tract "B" extending into the Indian River as
reflected on the Indian River County Property
Appraiser's Map of Section 34, Township 31 South,
Range 39 East as revised January 1, 1973.
Be changed from R-3 Multiple Dwelling District to R-1
Single Family District.
A public hearing in relation thereto will be held by the
Board of County Commissioners, of Indian River County, Florida
in the County Commission Room in the County Courthouse, Vero Beach,
Florida, on Wednesday, November 21, 1979, at 2:00 o'clock P.M.
Sincerely,
�rtAI-
Freda Wright
Clerk
jwc
cc= Hobart Brothers Co., Troy, Ohio
NOV 2 i 1979
mm
r
NOV 2 11979
mg .42 no 137
WENDY LANCASTER OF THE PLANNING STAFF STATED THAT THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS PART OF HOBART LANDING SUBDIVISION, UNIT 2,
LOCATED ON THE INDIAN RIVER APPROXIMATELY 650' NORTH OF HOBART ROAD.
SHE CONTINUED THAT HOBART BROTHERS RECEIVED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF A
PLAT FOR UNIT 3 OF HOBART LANDING SUBDIVISION WHEN A ZONING CHANGE
FROM R-3 To R-1 WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD ON AUGUST 22, 1979. MISS
LANCASTER COMMENTED THAT AT THE SAME MEETING,, THE BOARD INITIATED A
REZONING OF THE EAST 249.88 FEET OF TRACT B FROM R-3 TO R-1, AS
REQUESTED BY HOBART LANDING PROPERTY OWNERS. SHE REPORTED THAT NO
OPPOSITION WAS VOICED, AND STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE ZONING
CHANGE.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO SPEAK.
FRED BRIGGS, REPRESENTING HOBART BROTHERS, APPROACHED THE
BOARD AND STATED THAT HE WAS NOT NOTIFIED of THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED
MEETING HELD BY THE PLANNING a ZONING COMMISSION ON OCTOBER 11, 1979,
WHICH WAS POSTPONED UNTIL OCTOBER 15TH, THEREFORE, UNABLE TO VOICE
HIS OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE FROM R-3 To R-1.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WAS AWARE OF THE SITUATION
THAT THE MEETING DATE HAD BEEN CHANGED DUE TO AN INTERNAL MATTER.
MR. BRIGGS AGAIN EXPRESSED CONCERN FOR NOT BEING NOTIFIED
OF THE MEETING AS HE WAS INTERESTED IN ATTENDING. HE STATED THAT HE
WISHED TO GO ON RECORD THAT HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY HAS NO INTENTION
OF MAKING THIS INTO A MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. MR. BRIGGS SAID THAT
THEY DO NOT OWN PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH BUT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERING IT -
A GREAT DEAL DEPENDS UPON THE BOARD'S DECISION TODAY. HE STATED THE
R-3 PROPERTY IS WHERE THEY NOW HAVE THE BOAT HOUSE; THE ONLY WAY TO
DEVELOP THE LAND TO THE SOUTH, WITH PROPER PLANNING AND CONTROL, IS
THROUGH THE AREA UP FOR REZONING. MR. BRIGGS SAID THAT IS WHY THEY
REQUESTED R-3, NOT TO PUT UP A MOTEL, BUT THEY HAVE OTHER PEOPLE THAT
ARE INTERESTED IN DEVELOPING THE AREA FROM THE SOUTH, AND THIS COULD
BE THE PROPER WAY OF HAVING. ACCESS TO THE RIVER. HE FELT IT WAS NOT
FAIR THAT THEY SHOULD BE STOPPED BY JUST A FEW PEOPLE, AS IT WOULD
ENHANCE THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH TO HAVE A CANAL CUT THROUGH AT
THIS POINT.
w
_I
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE ZONING - --
HAD TO DO WITH CUTTING A CANAL THROUGH.
ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT ALL MR. BRIGGS WANTS TO
DO IS CUT A CANAL THROUGH, IF AND -WHEN IT COMES ABOUT, BUT THIS
COULD BE DONE IN R-1 ZONING AS WELL AS R-3.
MR. BRIGGS FELT THAT THE HURDLES WOULD BE EASIER TO OVER-
COME IF THE ZONING WERE R-3, ESPECIALLY IF THE STATE BECOMES INVOLVED.
HE REITERATED THAT THE OBJECTIONS OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE THAT
THEY DO NOT WANT MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN THAT AREA. MR, BRIGGS
FELT THAT FROM THE TIP OF THE PROPERTY WEST, IT COULD BE CONSIDERED
SPOIL ISLANDS.
HARRY F. HYND, PRESIDENT OF THE NEWLY FORMED HOBART LANDING
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, STATED THAT THEY WERE VERY PLEASED WITH THE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AND THE BOARDS ACTION AND THEY SUPPORT
100% THE ZONING CHANGE FROM R-3 TO R-1. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE ARE
BIG SIGNS INDICATING THAT HOBART LANDING IS PRIVATE PROPERTY, WITH
NO TRESPASSING ALLOWED, AND THEY ALL BOUGHT EXPENSIVE HOMES BECAUSE
THEY HAD ACCESS TO THE RIVER THROUGH THE CHANNEL. MR. HYND FELT
THERE ARE NOT MANY AREAS LEFT IN THE COUNTY SUCH AS THIS ONE; IT
IS A PRIVATE PROPERTY PLACE. HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS NOT A MATTER
OF HAVING A FEAR OF A MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT GOING IN, THEIR FEAR
IS THAT THIS PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT WILL NO LONGER CONTINUE TO BE PRIVATE.
HE STATED THAT R-1 ZONING IS VERY SPECIFIC IN THE USES OF THE
PROPERTY, AND HE FELT PUTTING A CANAL THROUGH THERE WAS NOT ONE
OF THEM. MR. HYND FELT THAT TO PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY, AND UNDER
THE AGREEMENTS IN WHICH THE HOMEOWNERS PURCHASED THEIR PROPERTY,
THE ZONING SHOULD BE CHANGED TO R-1,
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY, IF ZONED R-1,
COULD NOT BE USED FOR A MARINA; IT COULD BE CUT FOR A CHANNEL,
ASSUMING THE VARIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS COULD BE OBTAINED.
GEORGE KRAFT, 3536 MARTHAS LANE, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
THERE IS A DEPOSITION ON FILE SHOWING THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE
UNANIMOUS IN WANTING THE ZONING R-1 AND ONLY THOSE WANTING IT -TO BE
R-3 WERE HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY. HE CONTINUED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD
NOV 2 x.1979 41 mow `���..
NOV 2 11979
'900K 42 LS.q-
THAT THERE HAS BEEN A TRANSACTION FOR THE WET PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH
AND THAT IT IS ZONED AS A MARINA. MR. KRAFT SAID THERE WAS A
BAHAMIAN GROUP INTERESTED IN 79 ACRES AND THEY EXPECT TO CUT A
CHANNEL THROUGH; ONCE THAT CHANNEL IS CUT THROUGH, THEY WOULD HAVE
LOST EVERYTHING THAT WAS PROMISED TO THEM, INCLUDING THEIR PRIVACY.
MR. KRAFT COMMENTED THAT THEIR MAIN OBJECTION IS THAT THEY DON'T
WANT THE CHANNEL CUT THROUGH THERE; AND THEY DO AGREE WITH THE R-1
ZONING.
MR. RUSSELL, 3565 LUCY DRIVE, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND
STATED THAT HE AGREED WITH EVERYTHING THAT MR. KRAFT SAID. HE
REFERRED THEN TO THE STATEMENT THAT MR. BRIGGS MADE THAT NO MULTI -
HOMES WOULD BE BUILT ON THAT PROPERTY. MR. RUSSELL ADVISED THAT ONCE
BEFORE MR. BRIGGS WENT ON RECORD WITH HIM THAT THIS PROPOSED CHANNEL
WOULD NEVER BE BUILT THERE, THEREFORE, HE HAD NO FAITH OR CONFIDENCE
IN HIS GOING ON RECORD. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY ALL DEFINITELY WANT
TO SEE THE ZONING BE CHANGED TO R-1.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYONE PRESENT WHO
WISHED TO'SPEAK. THERE WERE NONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS AFFIRMED THAT A MARINA WOULD
BE A SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN R-3 ZONING.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE REQUEST BEFORE THE BOARD
TODAY STARTED BACK WHEN THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THIS AREA PREVAILED
UPON THE BOARD TO GIVE THEM SOME ASSURANCE THAT THIS PROPERTY WOULD
BE ZONED R-1, AND THERE HAS BEEN PLENTY OF NOTICE GIVEN ALONG THE
WAY.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER LYONS, FOR THE BOARD TO ADOPT ORDINANCE No. 79-30 REZONING
THE EAST 249.85 FEET OF TRACT B, HOBART LANDING UNIT 2 FROM R-3
MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT TO R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT.
_r
CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE CEfRTAINLY UNDERSTANDS HOW
THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR PRIVACYaAND THAT IT
REMAIN A PRIVATE AREA FOR THEM. HE CONTINUED THAT HE JUST COULDN'T
THINK OF THIS BOARD ALLOWING A MARINA TO BE BUILT IN ANY PRIVATE
AREA.
COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT THIS IS A VERY FAVORABLE
PIECE OF PROPERTY, WHATEVER THE ZONING.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE THEN ASKED MR. BRIGGS IF HE HAD ANY SUB—
STANTIAL DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW THAT IT WOULD BE MORE ADVANTAGEOUS
TO HAVING THE PROPERTY ZONED R-3.
MR. BRIGGS COMMENTED THAT HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY DOES
RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE BUILT BEAUTIFUL
HOMES; THE COMPANY HAS BEEN IN THE COUNTY A GOOD MANY YEARS AND WOULD
NOT DO ANYTHING TO DETERIORATE THE PROPERTY. HE CONTINUED THAT ALL
THEY.HNVE DONE OVER THE YEARS IS BRING UP THE VALUE OF THE AREA, AS
THEY ARE A WORLDWIDE COMPANY AND ARE NOT TRYING TO HURT ANYTHING.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE CANAL SYSTEM IS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF HOBART LANDING.
MR. BRIGGS STATED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS DO NOT OWN
THE CHANNELS BUT HE THOUGHT IT WOULD BE REASONABLE FOR THE PROPERTY
OWNERS TO OBJECT IF WE WOULD COME IN FROM THE WEST AND GO PAST THEIR
HOMES, BUT THEY ARE NOT DOING THAT OR DISTURBING ANY ONE OF THE
RESIDENTS. HE AGAIN WENT ON RECORD STATING THAT THEY WON'T ALLOW
ANYTHING OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMILY TO BE DEVELOPED THERE.
MR. KRAFT INTERJECTED THAT WHATEVER MR. BRIGGS IS PROMISING
HERE IS NOT REALLY LEGAL AND BINDING, AND THAT HE STILL SUPPORTS
THE R-1 ZONING.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE (QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED WITH CHAIRMAN WODTKE VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
43 BOOK 42 PAGE 140.
A
F_
NOV 211979
Foog 42 PAGE 141
0' 'R' D I 'N' 'A N C E N 0. 79-30
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone
the hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto held a public
hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens
were heard; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River
County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended
as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida,
to -wit:
The East 249.88 feet of Tract "B", Hobart Landing Unit
Two, as recorded in the Public Records of Indian River
County, Florida, Plat Book 1, page 46, AND that portion
of the land mass east of and adjacent to said Tract "B"
extending into the Indian River as reflected on the
Indian River County Property Appraisers Map of Section
34, Township 31 South, Range 39 East,as revised January
1, 1973
Be changed from R-13 Multiple dwelling district to R-1
Single Family District,
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth
and described in said Zoning Regulations.
This ordinance shall take effect' November 26, 1979.
STATE OF FLORIDA
-INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
THIS IS TO CrRTIFY THAT THIS IS
A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF
THE CRIG:.XAL ON FILE IN THIS
OFFICE.
FREDA WRIGHT, CLERK
Cl{ GCf
BY
DATE 4 " 9
THE BOARD NEXT HEARD A'PRESENTATION FROM ROBERT JONES
OF RISK MANAGEMENT -SERVICES REGARDING THE NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE, AS PER THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM
AND ATTACHMENTS:
November 13, 1979
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Robert Donlon, Personnel Director
At the Board of County Commission meeting on November 21, 1979,'
Robert Jones of Risk Management Services will present to you the new requirements
for Workmen's Compensation Insurance.
The attached material outlines the Osha Standards and the new State
of Florida rules and regulations.
I would like to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners
adopt this Safety program and that it include all agencies under our Workmen's
Compensation Insurance coverage.
Respectfully,
l
R. D.
OSHA STANDARDS ADOPTED FOR Pr ►^LIC SECTOR
rn fu.11 accordance with the provisions of the Florida State, ,and 21 days having passed since certification, tl7r, ,,hrnr
f%dministrative Procedures Act, Chapter 120 of Florida Statutes, safety standards and Rule became effective as of 12.01 a.m. April
the Bureau of Workmen's Compensation on April 4, 1979 30, 1979.
adopted as State safety standards Occupational Safety and Health As of the same date and time, and also in accordance with
Act (OSIIA) safety standards 29 CFR 1910 (General Industry Chapter 120 of the Administrative Procedures Act, off prior
Standards), 29 CFR 1926 (Standards for Construction)'and 29 Florida saf,,ty regulations, with the exception of EC -17 (Per-
CFR 1928 (Agriculture Standards). snnnr.l Hoist). 6C-40 (Confined Spaces), and 8G42 (Shnre Payed
Also adopted as a safety standard for the public sector was Materials Handling Equipment), wire retired as rr;gulations
Rule 14.15.09, Part 6, Manual on Traffic Control and Safe enforceable by the Bureau of Workmen's Co Mpensalinn.
Practices for Street and Highway C.,oistruction, Maintenance and,
Utility,Dperations of the Florida Depart,nent of Transportation.
>' Having been duly certified with the office of the Secretary of
45 gnm 142
NOV 211979
NOV 211979 BooK . 42 FAGE14
440.56 SAFETY RULES AND PROVISIONS PENALTY
ALL INSURANCE CARRIERS WRITING WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE
IN THIS STATE AND ALL EMPLOYERS QUALIFYING AS SELF -INSURES UN-
DER SS. 440.38 AND 440.57 SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY CONSULTATIONS
TO EACH OF THEIR POLICYHOLDERS REQUESTING SUCH CONSULTATIONS.
ALL SUCH CARRIERS AND SELF -INSURERS SHALL INFORM THEIR POLICY-
HOLDERS OF THE AVAILABILITY OF SUCH CONSULTATIONS AND SHALL RE-
PORT ANNUALLY ON THEIR SAFETY PROGRAMS AND CONSULTATIONS TO THE
DIVISION IN SUCH FORM AND AT SUCH TITIE AS THE DIVISION SHALL
PRESCRIBE. THE DIVISION SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROVING ALL
SAFETY PROGRAMS. THE DIVISION SF.ALL AID ALL INSURANCE CARRIERS
AND SELF -INSURERS IN ESTABLISHING THEIR SAFETY PROGRAMS BY SET-
TING OUT GUIDELINES IN AN APPROPRIATE FORMAT. -IN ADDITION, THE
DIVISION MAY APPROVE A SAFETY PROGRAM SUBMITTED TO IT BY A CAR-
RIER OR SELF -INSURER.
SAFETY PROGRAM GUIDELINES
(RE: FLORIDA STATUTE -- 440.56(4) AMENDED 1979)
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE REFERENCE STATUTE, THE DIVISION OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEREIN SET FORTH THE FOLLOWING GENERAL GUIDE-
LINES TO BE USED BY CARRIERS AND SELF -INSURERS IN ESTABLISHING :PM-
PLOYER SAFETY PROGRAMS:
GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR SAFETY PROGRAMS FOR EMPLOYERS
1. COMPANY SAFETY POLICY
THE MANAGEMENT SHALL ISSUE AND POST A COMPANY SAFETY POLICY
CONTAINING A CLEAR AND CONCISE VIEW OF MANAGEMENT'S DETER-
MINATION THAT ACCIDENT PREVENTION WILL BE ON PAR WITH PRODUC-
TION AND THAT ALL EMPLOYMENT AND PLACES OF EMPLOYMENT SHALL
BE FREE OF RECOGNIZABLE INDUSTRIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS.
- THE SAFETY POLICY SHALL DELEGATE RESPONSIBILITIES WITH RESPECT
TO IMPLEMENTING THE SAFETY PROGRAM.
II. COMPANY SAFETY RULES
THE MANAGEMENT SHALL DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A SET OF COMPANY SAFETY•
RULES WHICH SHALL BE EQUIVALENT TO OR EXCEED APPLICABLE OCCUPA-
TIONAL SAFETY -AND HEALTH ACT STANDARDS, SUCH RULES SHALL BE CON-
SISTENT WITH THE SIZE AND,TYPE,OF INDUSTRY FOR WHICH THE SAFETY
PROGRATI IS BEING DEVELOPED. -
- - — 46 - _ -
III. COMPANY -SAFETY INSPECTION PROGRAM
THE MANAGEMENT SHALL IMPLEMENT A COMPANY -SAFETY INSPECTION
PROGRAM, BY COMPANY PERSONNEL, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOW-
ING COMPONENTS:
A. DAILY INSPECTION
1. ALL PORTABLE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FOR GROUNDING.
2. HOUSEKEEPING, HANDLING USE AND STORAGE OF TOXIC,
FLAMMABLE, OR EXPLOSIVE CHEMICALS.
3. CONDITION OF PLANT INDUSTRIAL VEHICLES AND OPERATION
OF SUCH EQUIPMENT. (NOTE - THE OPERATION OF GASOLINE
DRIVEN OR UNSHIELDED ELECTRIC POWER TRUCKS IN THE
VICINITY OF POTENTIAL FLAMMABLE AND EXPLOSIVE LOCATIONS
SHOULD BE PROHIBITED.)
B. REGULAR AND PERIODIC INSPECTION
1. WORK ENVIRONMENT - MACHINE GUARDING, HANDRAILS, GUARD-
RAILS, STAIRS, STAIRRAILS, CATWALKS, RAMPS, RUNWAYS, _
NOISE, LIGHTING AND OTHER POSSIBLE HAZARDS.
2. JOB PROCEDURE - CONDUCT A JOB HAZARDS INSPECTION TO
ELIMINATE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE ANY EXISTING JOB HAZARD
WHICH MAY INJURE EMPLOYEES OR DAMAGE MATERIAL OR MACHINES.
3. FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION.
4. OTHER SAFETY INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF
INDUSTRY INVOLVED.
C. COMPANY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
THE MANAGEMENT SHALL SET UP AN APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE
SCHEDULE TO CHECK ALL:
1. TOOLS, EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY.
2. BUILDING STRUCTURE, INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR.
3. FLOOR AND ELEVATED STORAGE AREAS, FOR OVERLOADING.
4. VEHICLES.
IV. COMPANY SAFETY TRAINING PROGRAM
THE MANAGEMENT SHALL IMPLEMENT A SAFETY TRAINING PROGRAM WHICH
SHALL INCLUDE:
A. TRAINING, BY SUPERVISOR AND/OR TRAINED INSTRUCTOR, OF NEW
EMPLOYEES AND/OR EMPLOYEES TRANSFERRING TO NEW JOBS, ON
THE OPERATING PROCEDURES OF COMPANY VEHICLES AND MACHINES
TO BE UTILIZED BY THE EMPLOYEE.
B. INSTRUCTIONAL TRAINING FOR SUPERVISORS.
C. SPECIALIZED TRAINING AS REQUIRED BY OSHA STANDARDS.
D. DEFENSIVE DRIVING TRAINING FOR ALL OVER -THE -ROAD VEHICLE
DRIVERS.
Nov 2 11979 47 mox 42PAGE144
NOV 2 11979
V. COMPANY FIRST AID PROGRAM
BOOK 42 PACE 14-5
THE MANAGEMENT SHALL ADOPT A FIRST AID PROGRAM WHICH SHALL
PROVIDE FOR:
A. A TRAINED ATTENDANT ON EACH SHIFT AND ONE EACH REMOTE JOB
LOCATION.
B. PROPER TYPE OF SUPPLIES OF SUFFICIENT QUANTITY, KEPT IN
WELL SEALED CONTAINERS, AND RESTOCKED AS NEEDED.
C. BASIC TYPE FIRST AID KIT AT ALL JOB SITES.
VI. COMPANY ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION PROGRAM
THE COMPANY SHALL IMPLEMENT AN ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION PROGRAM
WHICH WILL INVESTIGATE AND RECORD ALL ACCIDENTS INVOLVING PER-
SONNEL, INCLUDING MEDICAL ONLY INJURIES, AND ACCIDENTS IN WHICH
MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND/OR MACHINES WERE DAMAGED. THE INVESTIGA-
TION SHOULD DETERMINE ALL OBTAI14ABLE FACTS OF EACH ACCIDENT AND
CITE CORRECTIVE MEASURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION.
VII. COMPANY RECORDKEEPING
THE MANAGEMENT SILNLL UTILIZE A RECORDKEEPING SYSTEM, WHICH MAY BE
SELECTED TO KEEP OSHA RECORDS. THIS RECORDKEEPING SYSTEM SHALL
BREAK DOWN INJURIES RECORDED BY TYFE OF ACCIDENT, AGENCIES, NATURE,
BODY LOCATION, AND BASIC CAUSE (LACK OF TRAINING, EXPERIMENTATION,
POOR I14PLEMEITTATION OF JOB PROCEDURE, ETC.). THESE RECORDS MUST
BE KEPT UP-TO-DATE.
ROBERT JONES APPROACHED THE BOARD AND EXPLAINED SOME
OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW; THE
STATE IS NOW SAYING THAT EVERY EMPLOYER WILL HAVE A SAFETY PROGRAM.
HE RECOMMENDED THAT ONE SAFETY POLICY BE ADOPTED IN THE COUNTY
AS HE FELT THIS WOULD BE THE EASIEST WAY; THE PROGRAM IS BROKEN
DOWN BY OCCUPATION,SO IT CAN BE DETERMINED WHERE THE ACCIDENTS
ARE HAPPENING. MR. .JONES NOTED THAT THEY HAVE PUT TOGETHER A
CONTROL PLAN AND ONE SECTION IS ENFORCING THE STANDARDS, THE
OTHER IS A TYPE OF AUDIT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE SAFETY PROGRAM
IS MAINTAINED. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WILL BE WORKING 'WITH PERSONNEL
DIRECTOR DONLON TO COORDINATE THIS SAFETY PROGRAM, BUT THE COUNTY
MUST COME UP WITH A FORMAL SAFETY PROGRAM.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING PENALTIES FOR NOT REPORTING
INJURIES, AND OF COUNTY RECORD KEEPING.
THE BOARD THANKED PSR. JONES FOR HIS PRESENTATION AND
NOTED THAT PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DONLON HAS A COPY IN HIS OFFICE
OF THE RECOMMENDED SAFETY PROGRAM.
ATTORNEY COLLINS BROUGHT UP THE SUBJECT OF THE
HOSPITAL BOND ISSUE AND WAS SATISFIED WITH THE RESOLUTION AS
AMENDED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER SOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION No. 79-116
AS PRESENTED AND AMENDED FOR THE RENOVATION BOND ISSUE ON THE
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING:, COURTHOUSE AND ANNEX.
NOV. 211979 49 em 42 fAcE 146,
- - , NOV 2 11979 BooK 42 PAGE 14?
RESOLUTION NO. 79-116
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION,
ALTERATION, FURNISHING AND EQUIPPING OF Ali
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COURTHOUSE AND
ANNEXES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF 140T EXCEEDING
$4,350,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS
TO FINANCE THE COST THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR
THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON
SUCH BONDS FROM THE RACE TRACK FUNDS AND JAI ALAI
FRONTON FUNDS ACCRUING ANNUALLY TO INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO LAW.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA (hereinafter referred to as "Board"),
that:
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR RESOLUTION. This resolution's
is adopted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 125, Florida
Statutes, Indian River County Ordinance No. 77-19 enacted August
3, 1977, and effective August 9, 1977, and other applicable provi-
sions of law.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. The following terms shall have
the following meanings herein, unless the text otherwise expressly
requires. Words importing singular number shall include the
plural number i -n each case and vice versa, and words importing
persons shall include firms and corporations.
Florida.
A. "Issuer" or "County" shall mean Indian River County,
B. "Board" shall mean the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida.
C. "Act" shall mean Chapter 125, Florida Statutes,
Indian Fiver County Ordinance No. 77-19, enacted August 3, 1977,
and effective August 9, 1977, and other applicable provisions of
law.
D. "Resolution" shall mean this resolution.
E. "Obligations" shall mean the Capital Improvement
Revenue Bonds, Series 1980, herein authorized to be issued:
F. "Serial Obligations" shall mean any Obligations for
the payment of the principal of which, at the maturity thereof,
� � r
no fixed Amortization Installment or bond redemption deposits are
required to be made prior to the twelve-month period immediately
preceding the stated date of maturity thereof.
G. "Term Obligations" shall mean the O'bligations of a
series all of which shall be stated to mature on one date and
which shall be subject to retirement by operation of the Bond
Amortization Account herein established within the Bond Service
Fund.
.H. "Amortization Installment", with respect to any Term
Obligations of a series, shall mean an amount or amounts so
designated which is or are established for the Term Obligations of
such series, provided that the aggregate of such Amortization
Installments for each maturity of Term Obligations of such series
shall equal the aggregate principal amount of each maturity of
Term Obligations of such series delivered on original issuance.
I. "Bond service requirement" for any Fiscal Year, as
applied to the Obligations of any series, shall mean the sum of:
(1) the amount required to pay the interest becoming due
on the Obligations of such series during such Fiscal Year, except
to the extent that such interest shall have been provided by
payments into the Bond Service Fund out of proceeds of the sale
of the Obligations for a specific period of time or by payments
of investment income into the Bond Service Fund from the Bond
Amortization Account or any accounts therein;
(2) the amount required to pay the principal of Serial
Obligations of such series maturing in such Fiscal Year; and
(3) the Amortization Installments established for the
maturities of Term Obligations of such series for such Fiscal
Year.
J. "Maximum bond service requirement" shall mean, as of
any particular date of calculation, the bond service requirement
which is largest in dollar amount for the then current or any
future Fiscal Year.
K.
NOV 211979
"Holder of Obligations" or "Holders" or any similar
-2-
42 x.48
_ I
NOV 2 11979
BOOK 4 PAGE 149
term shall mean any person who shall be the bearer or owner of
any outstanding Obligation or Obligations registered to bearer,
or not registered, or the registered owner of any such Obligation
or Obligations which shall at the time be registered other than
to bearer.
L. "Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds" shall
mean that portion of the Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton
Funds accruing annually to the County under the provisions of
Chapters 550 and 551, Florida Statutes, and allocated to the
Board pursuant to law.
M. "Authorized investments" shall mean any of the
following if and to the extent the same are at the time legal for
investment of municipal funds; (a) direct obligations of or obli-
gations guaranteed by the United States; (b) bonds, debentures or
notes issued by any of the following federal agencies: Bank for
Cooperatives; Federal Intermediate Credit Banks; Federal Home
Loan Bank System Export -Import Bank of Washington; Federal Land
Banks; or the Federal National Mortgage Association (including
Participation Certificates); (c) Public Housing Bonds, Temporary
Notes, or Preliminary Loan Notes fully secured by contracts with
the United States;_(d) full faith and credit obligations of any
State, provided that at the time of purchase such obligations
are rated in either of the two highest rating categories by two
nationally recognized bond rating agencies; (e) corporate deben-
tures rated in the highest rating category by two nationally
recognized bond rating agencies; or (f) time deposits represented
by certificates of deposit fully secured in the manner provided
by the laws of the State of Florida.
N. "Fiscal year" shall.mean the period commencing on
October 1 of each year and ending on the succeeding September 30,
or such other period as is at the time prescribed by law.
SECTION 3. FINDINGS. It is hereby found and determined
as follows:
A. It is necessary and desirable to reconstruct, alter,
-3-
r
furnish and equip existing capital facilities of the County
for use as an Administration Building, Courthouse and Annexes
(hereinafter referred to as "Project"), in accordance with the
plans and specifications of Connell, Metcalf & Eddy, Coral Gables,
Florida, Architects, now on file or to be filed with the Clerk
of the Board.
B. The County is authorized to pledge that portion of
the Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds accruing annually
to Indian River County under the provisions of Chapters 550 and
551, Florida Statutes, as allocated to the Board pursuant to law,
and the income from the investment of monies in the funds and
accounts hereinafter established to pay the principal of and
interest on the Obligations to be issued as hereinafter set
forth.
C. The estimated cost of such Project, as above
described, is the sum of Four Million Three Hundred Fifty Thousand
Dollars ($4,350,000). Such cost, in addition to the specific
items contained in the plans and specifications, may be deemed to
include the acquisition of any land or interest therein, or of
any fixtures or equipment, or properties necessary or convenient
therefor; expenses for estimates of costs and of revenues; expen-
ses for plans, specifications and surveys; administrative
expenses; interest on the Obligations proposed to be issued prior
to, during, and for not exceeding one year following the comple-
tion of the Project; establishment of reasonable reserves for
debt service; bond discount, if any; municipal bond insurance, if
any; and such other expenses as may be necessary or incidental
for the financing authorized by this Resolution, the undertaking
of the Project, and the placing of the same in operation.
D. The principal of and interest on the Obligations to
be issued pursuant to this Resolution and all other payments pro-
vided for herein will be payable solely from the Race Track Funds
and Jai Alai Fronton Funds and the income from the investment of
monies in the funds and accounts hereinafter established in the
manner herein provided.
E. Neither the Board nor the County will be required to
levy taxes on any real property within the County to pay the
principal of and interest on the Obligations or to make any other
payments provided for herein. The Obligations issued pursuant to
NOV 2 x.-1979 -4- �aaK 9 pac��.5d
1� -
NOV
211979
BooK 42
PAGE1,51
this
Resolution
shall not constitute a lien upon any properties
of the Board or any properties of or in the County.
SECTION 4. RESOLUTION TO CONSTITUTE CONTRACT. In con-
sideration of the acceptance of the Obligations authorized to be
issued hereunder by those who shall hold the same from time to
time, this Resolution shall be deemed to be and shall constitute
a contract between the County and such Holders. The covenants
and agreements herein set fortis to be performed by the County
shall be for the equal benefit, protection and security of the
legal Holders of any and all of such Obligations and the coupons
attached thereto, all of which shall be of equal rank and without
preference, priority, or distinction of any of the Obligations or
coupons over any other thereof, except as expressly provided
therein and herein.
SECTION 5. AUTHORIZATION OF OBLIGATIONS. Subject and
pursuant to the provisions of this Resolution, obligations of the
County to be known as "Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series
1980" herein sometimes referred to as "Obligations," are hereby
authorized to be issued in an aggregate principal amount not
exceeding Four -Million Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($4,350,000).
SECTION 6. DESCRIPTION OF OBLIGATIONS. The Obligations
shall be numbered consecutively from one upward; shall be in the
denomination of $5,000 each; shall be dated; shall bear interest,
payable semi-annually, at such rate or rates not exceeding the
maximum legal rate allowable by law; and shall mature on such
date in such years and amounts, all as shall be determined by
subsequent resolution of the Board adopted on or prior to the
sale of the Obligations. Such Obligations shall be issued in
coupon form; shall be payable with respect to both principal and
interest at a place or places to be determined by the Board prior
to the delivery of the Obligations; shall be payable in lawful
money of the United States of America; and shall bear interest
from their date, payable in accordance with and upon surrender of
-5-
the appurtenant interest coupons as they severally mature.
SECTION 7. EXECUTION OF OBLIGATIONS AND COUPONS. The
Obligations shall be executed in the name of the County by the
Chairman of the Board and countersigned and attested by its
Clerk, and its corporate seal or facsimile thereof shall be
affixed thereto or reproduced thereon. The facsimile signature
of the Chairman or the Clerk may be imprinted or reproduced on
the Obligations, provided that at least one signature required to
be placed -thereon shall be manually subscribed. In case any one
or more of the officers who shall have signed or sealed any of
the Obligations shall cease to be such officer of the Board
before the Obligations so signed and sealed shall have been
actually sold and delivered, such Obligations may nevertheless be
sold and delivered as herein provided and may be issued as if the
person who signed or sealed such Obligations had not ceased to
hold such office. Any Obligation may be signed and sealed on
behalf of the County by such person who at the actual time of the
execution of such Obligations shall hold the proper office in the
County, although at the date of such Obligations such person may
not have held such office or may not have been so authorized.
The coupons attached to the Obligations shall be authen-
ticated with the facsimile signature of any present or future
Chairman of the Board, and the validation certificate on said
Obligations shall be executed with the facsimile signature of said
Chairman. The Board may adopt and use for such purposes the fac-
simile signature of any person who shall have been such Chairman
at any time on or after the date of the Obligations, not-
withstanding that he may have ceased to be such officer at the
time such Obligations shall be actually sold and delivered.
SECTION 8. NEGOTIABILITY AND REGISTRATION. The
Obligations issued hereunder shall be and shall have all of the
qualities and incidents of negotiable instruments under the law
merchant and the laws of the State of Florida, and each suc-
cessive Holder, in accepting any of said Obligations or the
Me
NOV 2 11979
BOOK42.PA,E 15
NOV 211979
BOOK 42 " PAGE 153
coupons appertaining thereto, shall be conclusively deemed to
have agreed that such Obligations shall be and shall have all of
the qualities and incidents of negotiable instruments under the
law merchant and the laws of the State of Florida.
The Obligations may be registered at the option of the
Holder as to principal only at the office of the Clerk of the
Board, as Registrar, or with such other registrar as may be sub-
sequently designated by such Board, such registration to be noted
on the back of the Obligations in the space provided therefor.
After such registration as to principal only, no transfer of the
Obligations shall be valid unless made at said office by the
written assignment of the registered owner, or by his duly
authorized attorney in a form satisfactory to the Registrar, and
similarly noted on the Obligations, but the Obligations may be
discharged from registration by being in like manner transferred
to bearer and thereupon transferability by delivery shall be
restored. At the option of the Holder, the Obligations may
thereafter again from time to time be registered or transferred
to bearer as before. Such registration as to principal only
shall not affect the negotiability of the coupons which shall
continue to pass by. delivery.
SECTION 9. OBLIGATIONS MUTILATED, DESTROYED, STOLEN OR
LOST. In case any Obligation shall become mutilated, or be
destroyed, stolen or lost, the County may, in its discretion,
issue and deliver a new Obligation with all unmatured coupons
attached of like tenor as the Obligation and attached coupons, if
any, so mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost, in exchange and
substitution for such mutilated Obligation, upon surrender and
cancellation of such mutilated Obligation and attached coupons,
if any, or in lieu of and substitution for the Obligation and
attached coupons, if any, destroyed, stolen or lost, and upon the
Holder furnishing the County proof of his ownership thereof and
satisfactory indemnity and complying with such other reasonable
regulations and conditions as the County may prescribe and paying
-7-
such expenses as the County may incur. All Obligations and
coupons so surrendered shall be cancelled by the Clerk of the
Board. If any such Obligations or coupons shall have matured or
be about to mature, instead of issuing a substitute Obligation or
coupon, the County may pay the same, upon being indemnified as
aforesaid and if such Obligation or coupon be lost, stolen or
destroyed, without surrender thereof.
Any such duplicate O'bligations and coupons issued pur-
suant to -this section shall constitute original, additional,
contractual obligations on the part of the County whether or not
the lost, stolen or destroyed Obligations or coupons be at any
time found by anyone, and such duplicate Obligations and coupons
shall be entitled to equal and proportionate benefits and rights
as to lien on and source and security for payment from the funds,
as hereinafter pledged, to the same extent as all other
Obligations and coupons issued hereunder.
SECTION 10. PROVISION FOR REDEMPTION. The Obligations
of any maturity may be made subject to redemption prior to their
specified date of maturity, at the option of the County, at such
prices and under such terms and conditions as shall be fixed by
resolution or resolutions of the County adopted at or prior to
the sale thereof.
Notice of such redemption (i) shall be published at
least thirty (30) days prior to the redemption date in a finan-
cial journal published in the Borough of Manhattan, City and
State of .New York, (ii) shall be filed with the paying agents for
said Obligations, and (iii) shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to
all registered owners of Obligations to be redeemed at their
addresses as they appear on the registration books hereinabove
provided for. Interest shall cease to accrue on any Obligations
duly called for prior redemption on the redemption date, if
payment thereof has been duly provided for.
SECTION 11. FORM OF OBLIGATIONS AND COUPONS. The text
of the Obligations, the interest coupons and the certificate of
BOR NOV 2 11979 ` FA.U.. �
NOV 211979 Boa V PACE 15-5
validation to appear thereon shall be in substantially the
following form, with such omissions, insertions and variations as
may be necessary and desirable and authorized or permitted by
this Resolution or in any subsequent resolution adopted prior to
the issuance thereof:
No.
$5,000
UNITED .STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF FLORIDA
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
CAPITAI, IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BOND, SERIES 1980
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESEN'T'S, that Indian River
County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as "County"), for value
received hereby promises to'pay to the hearer, or if this bond he
registered, to the registered holder as herein provided, on the
first day of , 19 , solely from the s;necial funds
hereinafter mentioned, the principal sum of
FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
and to pay interest thereon from the date of this bond until
payment of such principal sum at the rate of
per centum ( %) per annum, payable semi-annually on the first
day of and the first day of of each year upon the
presentation and surrender of the annexed coupons as they
severally ;all due. Both principal of and interest on this bond
are payable at
or at the option of the holder, at
, in lawful money of the
United States of America.
This bond is one of an authorized issue of bonds, in an
aggregate principal amount not exceeding Four Million Three
Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($4,350,000), of like date, tenor
and effect except as to number, interest rate (if all bonds do
not bear the same rate), and date of maturity, issued to finance
the cost of the reconstruction, alteration, furnishing -and
equipping of an Administration Building, Courthouse and Annexes
in the County, under the authority of and in full compliance with
the Constitution and Statutes of the State of Florida, including
particularly Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, County Ordinance No.
77-19, enacted August 3, 1977, and effective August 9, 1977, and other
applicable provisions of law, and a resolution duly adopted by the
Board of County Commissioners of such County (the "Board") on the
-10-
BOOK 42 'PAGE 1,56
NOV 2 11979
NOV 211979 Boa 4 'PACE 15'7
day of , 1979, as supplemented (hereinafter
collectively called "Resolution"), and is subject to all the
terms and conditions of such Resolution.
This bond -and the coupons appertaining thereto are
payable solely from and secured by a first lien upon and a pledge
of that portion of the Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton
Funds accruing annually to the County under the provisions of
Chapters 550 and 551, Florida Statutes, and allocated to the
Board pursuant to law and the income from the investment of
monies held in the funds and accounts established by Section 14
of the Resolution. This bond does not constitute an indebtedness
of the Board or of the County within the meaning of any constitu-
tional, statutory or charter provision or limitation.
It is expressly agreed by the holder of this bond that
such holder shall never have the right to require or compel the
levy of ad valorem taxes for the payment of the principal of and
interest on this bond or for the making of any sinking fund,
reserve or other payments provided for in the Resolution. This
bond and the indebtedness evidenced thereby shall not constitute
a lien upon any property of the Board or upon any property of or
in the County but shall constitute a lien only upon the portion
of the Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds accruing
annually to the County and the income from investments in the
funds and accounts established by Section 14 of the Resolution in
the manner above recited.
It is hereby certified and recited that all acts, con-
ditions and things required to exist, to happen and to be per-
formed precedent to and in the issuance of this bond exist, have
happened and have been performed in regular and due form and time
as required by the Statutes and Constitution of the State of
Florida applicable thereto, and that the -issuance of this bond
and of the issue of bonds of which this bond is one does not
violate any constitutional or statutory limitation.
This bond and the coupons appertaining thereto are and
have all the qualities and incidents of a negotiable instrument
under the law merchant and the laws of the State of Florida.
(Insert Redemption Provisions)
Notice of such redemption shall be given in the manner
-11-
required by the Resolution.
This bond may be registered as to principal only in
accordance with the provisions endorsed hereon.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Indian River County, Florida, has
issued this bond and has caused the same to be executed by the
Chairman of its Board of County Commissioners and attested and
countersigned by the Clem of such Board, either manually or with
their facsimile signatures, and its corporate seal or a facsimile
thereof, •to be affixed, impressed, imprinted, lithographed or
reproduced hereon, and has caused the interest coupons hereto
attached to he executed with the facsimile signature of said
Chairman, all as of the first day of , 19 .
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTESTED AND COUNTERSIGNED:
Clerk, Board of County
Commissioners
No.
By:
Chairman, Board of County
Commissioners
FORM OF COUPON
Unless the bond to which this coupon is attached is
callable and has been duly called for prior redemption and provi-
sion duly made for the payment thereof, on the first day of
, 19 , Indian River County, Florida, promises to
pay to bearer at
at the option of the holder, at
from the funds described in the bond to which this coupon is
attached, the amount shown hereon, in lawful money of the United
States of America, upon presentation and surrender of this coupon,
being six months' interest then due upon its Capital Improvement
Revenue Bond, Series 1980, dated 1, 19 , numbered
-12-
BOOK �,
NOV 2 1-1979 PAGE 158
NOV 2 11979 BOOK 42 PAGE 159
(SEAL)
Chairman, Board of County Com-
missioners, Indian River County,
Florida
FORM OF VALIDATION CERTIFICATE
This bond is one of a series of bonds which were vali-
dated and confirmed by judgment of the Circuit Court for Indian
River County, Florida, rendered on
19
Chairman, Board of County Com-
missioners, Indian River County,
Florida
REGISTRATION PROVISION
This bond may be registered as to principal only in the
name of the holder on the books to be kept by the Clerk of the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, as
Registrar, or such other Registrar as may be subsequently
designated by such Board, such registration being noted hereon by
such Registrar in the registration blank below, after which no
transfer shall be valid unless made by the registered holder, or
his attorney duly authorized, and noted on said books and in the
registration blank below, but it may be discharged from registra-
tion by being transferred to bearer after which it shall be
transferable by delivery, but it may be again registered as
before. Such registration shall not restrain the negotiability
of the coupons by delivery.
DATE OF IN WHOSE NAME SIGNATURE OF
REGISTRATION REGISTERED REGISTRAR
-13-
SECTION 12. SECURITY FOR OBLIGATIONS. The principal of
and interest on the Obligations shall be secured forthwith
equally and ratably by a first lien upon and a pledge of all of
the portion of Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds
accruing annually to the County under the provisions of Chapters
550 and 551, Florida Statutes, and allocated to the Board pur-
suant to law and the income from the investment of monies held in
the various funds and accounts hereinafter established in Section
14 hereof. The County hereby irrevocably pledges such funds to
the payment of the principal of and interest on the Obligations
issued hereunder
SECTION 13. OBLIGATIONS NOT DEBT OF BOARD OR COUNTY.
Neither the Obligations nor coupons shall be or constitute
general obligations or indebtedness of the Board or of the
County within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory
limitation of indebtedness, but shall be payable solely from and
secured by a first lien upon and a pledge of that portion of the
Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds accruing annually to
the County under the provisions of Chapters 550 and 551, Florida
Statutes, and allocated to the -Board pursuant to law and the
income from the investment of monies held in the various funds
and accounts hereinafter established in Section 14 hereof. No
holder or holders of any Obligations issued hereunder or of any
coupons appertaining thereto shall ever have the right to compel
the levy of ad valorem taxes to pay the Obligations or interest
thereon or for the making of any other payments provided for in
this Resolution.
SECTION 14. COVENANTS OF THE COUNTY. For as long as
any of the principal of and interest on any of the Obligations
shall be outstanding and unpaid or until there shall have been
set apart in the Bond Service Fund, herein established, including
the Bond Amortization Account and the Reserve Account therein, a
sum sufficient to pay when due the entire principal of the
Obligations remaining unpaid, together with interest accrued or
to accrue thereon, the County covenants with the holders of any
and all Obligations as follows:
A. REVENUE FUND. Promptly after issuance of any of -the
Obligations the County will deposit all of the Race Track Funds
NOV 211979 -14 -
BOOK 4 ?AGE M
Nov 12 11979
BOOK 42 PgE161
and Jai Alai Fronton Funds immediately upon receipt into a spe-
cial fund which is hereby created and designated "Indian River
County Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 1980, Revenue
Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the "Revenue Fund").
B. DISPOSITION OF RACE TRACK FUNDS. All Race Track
Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds at any time remaining on deposit
in the Revenue Fund hereinabove created and established shall be
disposed of commencing with the Fiscal Year 1979-80, only in the
following manner and in the following order of priority:
(1) Moneys on deposit in the Revenue Fund shall first
be used for deposit into a separate fund, which is hereby created
and designated the "Bond Service Fund", such sums as will be suf-
ficient to pay the following amounts on a parity basis (a) all
interest becoming due and payable on the Obligations during the
current Fiscal Year, (b) the principal amount of Serial
Obligations which will become due and payable on the next prin-
cipal maturity date; and (c) the Amortization Installments, if
any, required to be made on the next annual payment date.
Such Amortization Installments shall be credited to a
"Bond Amortization Account", which is hereby created and
established in said Bond Service Fund. A separate special sub -
account within the Bond Amortization Account shall be established
for each series of Term Obligations outstanding, and if there
shall be more than one stated maturity for Term Obligations of a
series, then a separate special subaccount in the Bond Amortization
Account shall be established for each such separate maturity of
Term Obligations.
Upon the sale of any series of Term Obligations, the
County shall, by resolution, establish the amounts and maturities
of such Amortization Installments for each series, and if there
shall be more than one maturity of.Term Obligations within a
series, the Amortization Installments for the Term Obligations of
each maturity.
Moneys on deposit in each of the separate special sub-
-15-
M
_I
accounts in the Bond Amortization Account shall either be used for
the open market purchase or the redemption of Term Obligations
of the series or maturity of Term Obligations.within a series for
which such separate special subaccount is established in the
manner hereinafter specified.
(2) Moneys remaining in the Revenue Fund shall next be
applied by the County to 'maintain a Reserve Account in said Bond
Service Fund, which Reserve Account is hereby created and
established, in an amount equal to the maximum bond service
requirement on the Obligations, all or a portion of which such
sum may be initially provided from the proceeds of the sale of
the Obligations. The County shall thereafter deposit annually
into said Reserve Account an amount equal to twenty per cent
(20%) of the difference between the amount, if any, so deposited
upon the delivery of the Obligations and the amount required to
be maintained therein by the provisions of this subparagraph (2).
No further payments shall be required to be made into such
Reserve Account when there has been deposited therein and as long
as there shall remain on deposit therein a sum equal to the maxi-
mum bond service requirement on the Obligations.
Any withdrawals from the Reserve Account shall be sub-
sequently restored from the first moneys available in the Revenue
Fund after all required current payments into.the Bond Service
Fund, including the Bond Amortization Account therein, and into
the Reserve Account, including all deficiencies for prior
payments, have been made in full.
Moneys in the Reserve Account shall be used only for the
purpose of the payment of maturing principal (including
Amortization Installments) of or -interest on the Obligations when
the moneys in the Bond Service Fund are insufficient therefor,
and for no other purpose.
Whenever the amount on deposit in the Reserve Account
exceeds the amount required to be maintained therein by the pro-
visions of this subparagraph (2), the excess may be withdrawn and
NOV 2 1-1979
i
-1&-
BOOK 42 PAF 162
r .
NOV 211979
Boa 42 PgE 163
deposited into the Bond Service Fund or the Bond Amortization
Account therein, or may be used by the County for the redemption
of Obligations of not less than $10,000 in principal amount at
any one time, in the manner herein provided, or for the purchase
of Obligations in the open market at prices not exceeding the
then applicable call price, or for any other lawful purpose.
The County shall not be required to make any further
payments into the Bond Service Fund, including the Bond
Amortization Account therein, or into the Reserve Account when
(i) the aggregate amount of moneys in such Bond Service Fund, the
Bond Amortization Account therein, and the Reserve Account
therein are at least equal to the aggregate principal amount of
Obligations then outstanding, plus the amount of interest then
due or thereafter to become due on such Obligations then
outstanding or (ii) the County shall have made provision for
payment of the Obligations as provided in Section 17 of this
Resolution.
(3) The balance of any moneys remaining in the Revenue
Fund after the above required current payments have been made may
be used by the -County for any lawful purpose.
(4) The Revenue Fund, the Bond Service Fund and the
s
Bond Amortization Account and the Reserve Account therein, and
any other special funds or accounts herein established and
created shall constitute trust funds for the purposes provided
herein for such funds. All such funds shall be continuously
secured in the same manner as state and municipal deposits are
required to be secured by the laws of the State of Florida.
Moneys on deposit in any of such funds and accounts may bq
invested and reinvested in Authorized Investments.
Investments made with moneys in the Revenue Fund and the
Bond Service Fund (including the Bond Amortization Account
therein) must mature not later than the date that such moneys
will be needed but in no event later than one year from the date
of purchase.
Investments made with moneys in the Reserve Account
-17-
must mature not later than the final maturity of any Obligations
then outstanding. Any and all income received by the County from
all such investments shall upon receipt thereof be deposited into
the Revenue Fund.
The cash required to be accounted for in each of the
foregoing funds and accounts established herein may be deposited
in a single bank account, and funds allocated to the various
accounts established herein may be invested in a common invest-
ment pool, provided that adequate accounting records are main-
tained to'reflect and control the restricted allocation of the
cash on deposit therein and such investments for the various pur-
poses of such funds and accounts as herein provided.
The designation and establishment of the various funds
in and by this Instrument shall not be construed to require the
establishment of any completely independent, self -balancing funds
as such term is commonly defined and used in governmental
accounting, but rather is intended solely to constitute an ear-
marking of certain moneys and assets of the County for certain
purposes and to establish certain priorities for application of
such moneys and assets as herein provided.
C. OPERATION OF BOND AMORTIZATION ACCOUNT. Moneys held
for the credit of the Bond Amortization Account shall be applied
to the retirement of Term Obligations as follows:
(1) Subject to the provisions of Paragraph (3) below,
the County shall endeavor to purchase Term Obligations then out-
standing at the most advantageous price obtainable with reason-
able diligence, such price not to exceed the principal of such
Term Obligations plus the amount of the premium, if any, which
would be payable on the next redemption date to the Holders of
such Term Obligations if such Term Obligations should be called
for redemption on such date from moneys in the Bond Amortization
Account. The County shall pay the interest accrued on such Term
Obligations to the date of delivery thereof from the Bond Service
Fund and the purchase price from the Bond Amortization Account
therein, but no such purchase shall be made by the County within
Eno
NOV 211979 Box 42
NOV 2 11979 ROCK 4. , FACES
the period of 45 days immediately preceding any interest payment
date on which Term Obligations are subject to call for redemp-
tion, except from moneys in excess of the amounts set aside or
deposited for the redemption of Term Obligations.
(2) Subject to the provisions of Paragraph (3) below,
whenever sufficient money is on deposit in the Bond Amortization
Account to redeem $5,000 or more principal amount of Term
Obligations, the County shall call for redemption from money in
the Bond Amortization Account such amount of Term Obligations
then subject to redemption as, with the redemption premium, if
any, will exhaust the money then held in the Bond Amortization
Account as nearly as may be practicable. Prior to calling Term
Obligations for redemption, the County shall withdraw from the
Bond Service Fund and from the Bond Amortization Account therein
and set aside in separate accounts or deposit with the paying
agents the respective amounts required for paying the interest on
and the principal of and redemption premium applicable to the
Term Obligations so called for redemption.
(3) Moneys in the Bond Amortization Account shall be
applied by the County in each Fiscal Year to the retirement of
Term Obligations then outstanding in the following order:
(a) The Term Obligations of each series of Obligations
to the extent of the Amortization Installment, if any, for such
Fiscal Year for the Term Obligations of each such series then
outstanding, plus the applicable premium, if any, and, if the
amount available in such Fiscal Year shall not be sufficient
therefor, then in proportion to the Amortization Installment, if
any, for such Fiscal Year for the Term Obligations of each such
series then outstanding, plus the applicable premium, if any;
provided, however, that if the Term Obligations of any such
series shall not then be subject to redemption from moneys in the
Bond Amortization Account and if the County shall at any time be
unable to exhaust the moneys applicable to the Term Obligations
-19-
unable to exhaust the moneys applicable to the Term Obligations
of such series under the provisions of this clause or in the
purchase of such Term Bonds under the provisions of Paragraph (1)
above, such money or the balance of such money, as the case may
be, shall be retained in the Bond Amortization Account and, as
soon as it is feasible, applied to the Term Obligations of such
series; and
(b) Any balance •then remaining, other than money
retained under the first clause of this Paragraph (3), shall be
applied to the retirement of such Term Obligations as the County
in its sole discretion shall determine, but only, in the case of
the redemption of Term Obligations of any series, in such amounts
and on such terms as may be provided in the resolution
authorizing the issuance of the Obligations of such series.
(4) The County shall deposit into the Bond Amortization
Account Amortization Installments for the amortization of the
principal of the Term Obligations, together with any deficiencies
for prior required deposits, such Amortization Installments to be
in such amounts and to be due in such years as shall be deter-
mined by resolution of the Board prior to the delivery of the
Obligations.
The County shall pay from the Sinking Fund all expenses
in connection with any such purchase or redemption.
D. ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS. The County hereby covenants
and agrees not to incur any other obligations or indebtedness,
except refunding obligations as hereinafter provided, payable
from the same source as the payments hereinbefore specified to be
made into the Bond Service Fund and Reserve Account, unless such
obligations contain an express statement that such obligations
are junior and subordinate in all respects to the Obligations
herein authorized as to lien on and source and security for
payment from the Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds.
E. REMEDIES. Any Holder of Obligations, or of any
-20-
N011 2 11979 Fact �'66
N OV 211979 Boos 42 PAGE 1 j 7
coupons appertaining thereto, issued under the provisions of this
Resolution, may either at law or in equity, by suit, action, man-
damus or other proceedings in any Court of competent jurisdic-
tion, protect and enforce any and all rights under the laws of
the State of Florida or granted and contained in the Act and in
this Resolution, and may enforce and compel the payment of all
sums and the performance of all duties required by this
Resolution or by any applicable statutes to be performed by the
County, or by any officer thereof, including but not being
limited to, the application and distribution of the Race Track
Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds in the manner provided in this
Resolution.
F. BOOKS AND RECORDS. The County shall keep 'gooks and
records of the receipt of all Race Track Funds and Jai Alai
Fronton Funds received by it, including particularly the Race
Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds pledged hereunder, which
such boobs and records shall be kept separate and apart from all
other books, records and accounts of the Issuer and any Holder of
an Obligation or Obligations shall have the right at all reasonable
times to inspect all records, accounts and data of the County
relating thereto. -
G. ANNUAL AUDIT. The County shall also, at least once
a year, within 60 days after the close of the Fiscal Year, cause
the books, records and accounts relating to such Race Track Funds
and Jai Alai Fronton Funds to be properly audited by the State
Auditor and shall mail, upon request, and make generally
available, the report of such audits to any Holder or Holders of
Obligations. A copy of such annual audit shall also be furnished
to the original purchasers of the Obligations.
H. NO IMPAIRMENT OF CONTRACT. The County has full
power and authority to irrevocably pledge the portion of Race
Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds hereinabove described to
the payment of the principal of and interest on the Obligations.
The pledge of such Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds,
-21-
M
in the -manner provided herein, shall not be subject to repeal,
modification or impairment by any subsequent resolution or other
proceedings of the County or by any subsequent act of the
Legislature of Florida without and unless such Issuer shall have
provided, or the Legislature shall have made immediately
available to the County, such additional or supplemental funds
which shall be sufficient to retire such Obligations and the
interest thereon in accordance with their terms. The County
shall take all actions and pursue such legal remedies which may
be available to it either in law or in equity to prevent or cure
any default or impairment as within the meaning of this subsec-
tion H.
I. ARBITRAGE. The County does hereby further covenant
that no use will be made of the proceeds of the Obligations which
would cause the Obligations to be "arbitrage bonds" within the
meaning of Section 103(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
as amended, and the applicable regulations thereunder. The
County, at all times while such Obligations and the interest
thereon are outstanding, including refundings thereof, will
comply with the requirements of said Section 103(c) and with the
valid and applicable rules and regulations of the Internal
Revenue Service thereunder.
SECTION 15. CONSTRUCTION TRUST FUND. All of the pro-
ceeds derived from the sale of the Obligations (except (i) an
amount equal to accrued interest to be deposited in the Bond
Service Fund, and (ii) an amount equal to all or a portion of the
maximum bond service requirement on the Obligations to be depo-
sited in the Reserve Account) shall be deposited in a trust fund
which is hereby created, established and designated as the
"Construction Trust Fund." Such Construction Trust Fund shall be
deposited and maintained with any banking institution in the
State of Florida approved as a County depository and subsequently
designated by the County. The moneys therein shall be used only
for the payment of the cost of the Project as hereinabove
-22-
NOV 211979 eoGK 2 FACE 168
NOV 211979
MOK
42
FACE MO
defined, but, pending such
application, may be invested in
Authorized Investments maturing at such time or times as
necessary to meet the requirements of the Construction Trust
Fund, the income from such investments to remain in said
Construction Trust Fund. Any balance of unexpended moneys in the
Construction Trust Fund after completion of such Project shall be
deposited in the Revenue Fund hereinbefore established.
SECTION 16. RIGHTS OF THE OBLIGATION HOLDERS. The
Holders of the Obligations shall have no responsibility for the
application and use of the proceeds received from the sale
thereof and the application and use of such proceeds by the
County shall in no way affect the rights of the Obligation
Holders. The County shall be irrevocably obligated, upon receipt
thereof, to use the Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds
pledged hereunder to pay the principal of and interest on the
Obligations and to make all reserve and other payments provided
for herein, notwithstanding any failure of the County to apply
such Obligation proceeds in the manner provided herein.
SECTION 17. DEFEASANCE. If, at any time, the County
shall have paid, or shall have made provision for payment of, the
principal, interest and redemption premiums, if any, with respect
to the Obligations, then, and in that event, the pledge of and
lien on the Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds in favor
of the Holders of the Obligations shall be no longer in effect.
For purposes of the preceding sentence, deposit of Federal
Securities or bank certificates of deposit fully secured as to
principal and interest by Federal Securities (or deposit of any
other securities or investments which may be authorized by law
from time to time and sufficient under such law to effect such a
defeasance) in irrevocable trust with a banking institution or
trust company, for the sole benefit of the Holders of such
Obligations, in an amount such that the principal of and interest
on such securities or certificates will be sufficient to pay when
due the principal, interest, and redemption premiums, if any, on
the outstanding Obligations, shall be considered "provision for
- -23-
I
payment Nothing herein shall be deemed to require the County
to call -any of the outstanding Obligations for redemption prior
to maturity pursuant to -any applicable optional redemption provi-
sions, or to impair the discretion of the County in determining
whether to exercise any such option -'for early redemption.
SECTION 18. SALE OF OBLIGATIONS. The Obligations shall
be sold and issued in such manner and at such price or prices
consistent with the provisions of the Act and this Resolution as
shall be determined by subsequent resolution of the County
adopted prior to such sale and issuance, respectively.
SECTION 19. VALIDATION AUTHORIZED. The Attorney for
the County be, and he is, hereby authorized and directed to
institute proceedings in the Circuit Court for Indian River
County, Florida, for the validation of said Obligations, and the
proper officers of the County are hereby authorized to verify on
behalf of the County any pleadings in such proceedings.
SECTION 20. MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT. No material
modification or amendment of this Resolution or of any resolution
amendatory hereof or supplemental hereto, may be made, without the
consent in writing of the Holders of sixty-six and two-thirds per
centum (b& 2/3%) or more in principal amount of the Obligations
then outstanding; provided, however, that no modification or
amendment shall permit a change in the maturity of such
Obligations or a reduction in the rate of interest thereon or in
the amount of the principal Obligation thereof or affecting the
unconditional promise of the County to collect such portion of
the Race Track Funds and Jai Alai Fronton Funds as herein pro-
vided, or to pay the principal of and interest on the Obligations
as the same shall become due from such Race Track Funds and Jai
Alai Fronton Funds, or reduce such percentage of Holders of such
Obligations, required above, for such modifications or amend-
ments, without the consent of the Holders of all of such
Obligations; provided further, however, that no modification or
amendment of this Resolution or of any resolution amendatory
-24-
NOV 211979 42. PAGE1 t O
NOV 211979
BOOK 42' PACE 171
hereof or supplemental hereto may be made which shall allow or
permit any acceleration of the payment of principal of ,or
interest on the Obligations upon any default in the payment
thereof, whether or not the Holders of the Obligations consent
thereto.
SECTION 21. SEVERABILITY. If any one or more of the
covenants, agreements or provisions of this Resolution shall be•
held contrary to any express provision of law or contrary to the
policy of express law, though not expressly prohibited, or
against public policy, or shall for any reason whatsoever be held
invalid, then such covenants, agreements or provisions shall be
null and void and shall be deemed separate from the remaining
covenants, agreements or provisions, and in no way affect the
validity of all the other provisions of this Resolution or of the
Obligations or coupons issued thereunder.
SECTION 22. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall take
effect immediately upon its adoption.
ATTEST
re a r�g'xnt
Clerk ?
Adopted 11-21-79
BOARD Or COUNTY COMtZISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, ORIDA
William C. Wodtke, Jr.
Chairman
-25-
EXTRACTS FROM THE MINUTES OF A SPECIAL
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
HELD ON THE 21st DAY OF November , 19 79
The Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida
met in regular meeting at the Indian River County Courthouse
in the City of Vero Beach , Florida , at
8:30
o'clock
A.M.
on the
21st day of November ,
19 79
,-the
place,
hour, and
date duly established .for the hold-
ing of such meeting.
The Chairman
called the meeting to order and
on roll call the following answered present:
William C. Wodtke, Jr. , Willard W. Siebert, Jr. ,
Alma Lee Loy
Patrick B. Lyons ,
R. Don Deeson
and the following were absent:
r
The Chairman
A Resolution entitled:
declared a quorum present.
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION,
ALTERATION, FURNISHING AND EQUIPPING OF AIJ
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COURTHOUSE AND
ANNEXES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT EXCEEDING
�4, 350, 000 CAPITAL IIIPROVEME14T REVENLE b0NDS
TO FINANCE THE COST THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR
THE PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON
SUCH BONDS FROM THE RACE TRACK FUNDS AND JAI ALAI
FRONTON FUNDS ACCRUING ANNUALLY TO INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO I.AW.
was introduced by Mr. Willard W. Siebert, Jr.
The Resolution was then read in full and discussed
and considered.
NOV 2 11979
I
e
$� X42 PAcE17
A
NOV 2 11979
BOOK 4 ) PAGE 173
Mr. Willard W. Siebert,Jr. then moved the adoption
of the Resolution as introduced and read. Ms. Alma Lee Loy
seconded the motion, and, on roll call, the following voted "Aye":
William C. Wodtke, Jr., R. Don Deeson, Patrick B. Lyons,
Williad W. Siebert, Jr. and Alma Lee Loy ;
and the following voted "Nay": None
The Chairman thereupon declared the motion
carried and the Resolution adopted as introduced and read.
There being no further business to come before the
meeting, upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting was
adjourned.
-2-
CERTIFICATE OF RECORDING OFFICER
The undersigned HEREBY CERTIFIES that:
1. SHe is the duly appointed, qualified and acting
Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida
(herein called the Clerk , and keeper of the
records thereof, including the minutes of its proceedings;
2. The annexed copy of extracts from the minutes of
the regular meeting of the Board of County Comm;ssioners
held on the 21st day of November , 19 79, is a
true, correct, and compared copy of the whole of the original
minutes of the meeting on file and of record insofar as the
same relate to the resolution referred to in such extracts and
to the other matters referred to therein;
3. The meeting was duly convened in conformity with
all applicable requirements; a proper quorum was present through-
out the meeting and the resolution hereinafter mentioned was
duly proposed, considered, and adopted in conformity with appli-
cable requirements; and all other requirements and proceedings
incident to the proper adoption of the resolution have been duly
fulfilled, carried out, and otherwise observed;
and
4. He is duly authorized to execute this Certificate;
5. The copy of the resolution annexed hereto entitled:
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION,
ALTERATION, FURNISHING AND EQUIPPING OF A14
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COURTHOUSE AND
ANNEXES IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF 140T EXCEEDING
$4,350,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS
TO FINANCE THE COST THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR
THE PAY14ENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON
SUCH BONDS FROM THE RACE TRACK FUNDS AND JAI ALAI
FROIJTON FUNDS ACCRUING ANNUALLY TO INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO LAW. '
is a true, correct, and compared copy of the original resolution
referred to in the extracts and as finally adopted at the meet-
ing and, to the extent required by law, as thereafter duly signed
or approved by the proper officer or officers of the Board of
County Commissioners , which resolution is on file and of record.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Clerk ,
this 21st day of November , 1979 .
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
%)
Freda Wright
(SEAL)
NOV 211979 BOOK 49 FAc' 174
NOV 211919 BOOK 42 pAGE175
RANBIR SINGH, CONNELL METCALF & EDDY, INC., APPROACHED
THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR ADDITIONS AND
RENOVATIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND THE COURTHOUSE.
HE STATED THAT HE WAS IMPRESSED WITH THE DETAILS RECEIVED FROM
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT KONTOULAS AFTER HIS REVIEW
OF THOSE DOCUMENTS, AND ADVISED THAT MOST OF THOSE COMMENTS HAVE
ALREADY BEEN TAKEN CARE OF. MR. SINGH NOTED THAT HE WILL BE SENDING
A COPY OF THE DRAFT PREPARED FOR ADVERTISING THE BIDS NEXT WEEK
FOR THE BOARDS REVIEW AND WOULD LIKE, IF POSSIBLE, AUTHORIZATION
AT THE DECEMBER 5, 1979 MEETING FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR TO ADVERTISE
THE PROJECT FOR BIDS. HE COMMENTED THAT THEY WILL BEGIN PRINTING
THE DRAWINGS AND WILL BE DISTRIBUTING SETS TO THE CONTRACTORS
BETWEEN DECEMBER 15TH AND 31ST; ALSO THEY WILL SCHEDULE A PRE-BID
CONFERENCE, MR. SINGH REPORTED THAT ALL CONTRACTORS WILL BE
WELCOME TO COME TO THIS CONFERENCE TO ASK QUESTIONS ON THE PROJECT.
HE NOTED THAT THE BIDS WILL BE OPENED ON JANUARY 23, 1980 AT THE
REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING, READ ALOUD, AND THE FIGURES NOTED;
AFTERWARD THE BIDS WILL BE ANALYZED AND THEY WILL MAKE RECOMMENDA
TIONS. MR. SINGH STATED THAT ON JANUARY 31, 1980 A WORKSHOP FOR
THE COMMISSION WILL BE SCHEDULED TO TAKE ACTION AND, HOPEFULLY,
AWARD THE CONTRACT; ANY FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS SHOULD BE MADE
AT THAT TIME. HE COMMENTED THAT THE INFLATION FACTOR IS 12% TO
15% PER YEAR, WHICH IS THE SCHEDULE AGREED UPON IN THE WORKSHOP
MEETING HELD SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, AND ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THESE
FUGURES CAN BE VERY COSTLY LATER.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE SCHOOL BOARD AND IT
WAS STRESSED THAT IT WAS IMPERATIVE THAT ANY AGREEMENTS SHOULD
BE SETTLED BY THE BIDDING DATE OF DECEMBER 15, 1979, IF POSSIBLE.
CHAIRMAN WODTKE EXPLAINED THAT HE HAS BEEN IN CONTACT
WITH DR. BURNS OF THE SCHOOL BOARD AND WITH ATTORNEY COLLINS AND
ATTORNEY CALDWELL AND THEY ARE IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING OUT
THE DETAILS OF A PROPOSED LEASE WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD.
THE BOARD THEN COMMENDED THE FINE WORK THAT PAIR. KONTOULAS
DID ON THE REVIEW OF THE DOCUMENTS, AND WERE HOPEFUL OF MEETING
ALL THE DEADLINES IN ORDER'TO GET THE JOB DONE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THE BOARD COULD GIVE HIM
THE RESPONSIBILITY TO LOOK INTO AN EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE
IF THE PROBLEM DOES ARISE.
DISCUSSION ENSUED AND THE BOARD HAD NO OBJECTION OF
COMMISSIONER LYONS LOOKING INTO THE MATTER,
COMMISSIONER LOY NEXT BROUGHT UP THE SUBJECT OF THE
BEACH EROSION STUDY AND STATED THAT THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS WOULD
LIKE.TO ASK THE COUNTY TO REAFFIRM THEIR ASSURANCES ON THIS
STUDY. SHE CONTINUED THAT BASED ON WHAT HAPPENED TO THE COUNTY
DURING THE HURRICANE, IT SEEMS IMPERATIVE THAT WE GET SOMETHING
ON ITS WAY TO WASHINGTON FOR APPROVAL.
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT HE WOULD GO ALONG WITH SAYING
THAT IT SHOULD BE KEPT ALIVE; EITHER WE DO SOMETHING SUCH AS PUMP
SAND ONTO THE BEACHES OR YOU LET THE BUILDINGS FALL INTO THE WATER.
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WAS IN AGREEMENT WITH REAFFIRMING
OUR ASSURANCES FOR THE STUDY ON BEACH EROSION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO WRITE
A LETTER PROVIDING BASIC COUNTY ASSURANCES TO THE COMMITTEE FOR
THE BEACH EROSION STUDY,
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED PREVAILING UPON THE DOT TO
GET THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE ROAD WORK ON US #1 AT THE RELIEF CANAL
TO FINISH THE JOB AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AS IT IS MOVING TOO SLOWLY.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HE WOULD WRITE TO
THE DOT CONCERNING THIS MATTER,
CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTIFIED THE BOARD THAT SOMEONE MUST BE
APPOINTED TO THE DISTRICT 10 MENTAL HEALTH BOARD AND WAS OPEN FOR
SUGGESTIONS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM
TO THE CLERKS AGENDA.
ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING MEMO-
RANDUM AND ATTACHMENT CONCERNING PISTOL PERMITS:
NOV 211979 79 Baas 42 pn' 17� .
NOV 211979
•6QQK
November 21, 1979
To: The Board of County Commissioners
From: Freda Wright, Clerk
The following applications for pistol permits
have been completed in accordance with the require-
ments of Ordinance 79-27. Each applicant has
completed the required training course and their
applications have been duly processed by the Clerk's
Office and the Sheriff's Department.
The Sheriff has no objection to issuance of a
Pistol permit to the following:
James Brown
Charles Wilson Behler
Andrew W. offutt
George Daniel McCarthy
Leroy -Brown
Ferdinand Kulima
Virgin xargreavee Deputy Clerk
P.S. See Sheriff's comment re James Brown.
November 19, 1979
Mr. William C. Wodtke, Jr.
Chairman - Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County
County Courthouse
2145 14th Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: James Brown
Pistol Permit Applicant
dob: 6/21/1909
ss#: 263/26/0349
Dear Mr. Wodtke:
The above named JAMES BROWN, a resident of Vero Beach - Indian
River County for the past several years, has applied to the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River County for a pistol permit.
The records have been checked through the Indian River County
Sheriff's Department - Records Division and checked through NCIC.
There are no records, warrants or holds on JAMES BROWN a/k/a BUSTER
BROWN.
I have no objections to the issuance of a pistol permit to
JAMES BROWN, however this permit can not be used in lieu of the
State Permit for Security guards. Mr. Brown would like the permit
for self-protection while engaged in business with Catron Truck
Brokerage. Please be further advised that a letter from Catron Truck
Brokerage was not included with this application but there may be one
on file with his previous application.n
Pytr ly yours,
. JOYCE, S ERIFF
_
In
River County
80
42' P'ACE177
f-
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT MR. JAMES
BROWN RECEIVE A COPY OF SHERIFF .JOYCE'S LETTER AND UNDERSTANDS
THAT IT IS ISSUED FOR PERSONAL SAFETY AND NOT FOR A SECURITY
GUARD.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS—
SIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION FOR A
PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM FOR THE FOLLOWING:
JAMES BROWN CHARLES WILSON BEHLER
ANDREW W. OFFUTT GEORGE DANIEL MCCARTHY
LEROY BROWN FERDINAND KULIMA
AND BASED ON MR. .JAMES BROWN'S UNDERSTANDING, THAT HIS PERMIT
IS ISSUED FOR PERSONAL SAFETY AND NOT FOR A SECURITY GUARD.
THE SHERIFF HAS NO OBJECTION TO. THE OTHER PERMITS.
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED
AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY
FUND NOS. 63888 - 64038 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING
ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE
WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE
SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE
AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE
A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED
AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 4:10 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
CLER K CHAIRMAN
NOV 24 1979 81 moo. 42 PAcE 178