Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/5/1980MARCH 5, 1980 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO REACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 1980, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLARD W. SIEBERT, SJR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE LOY, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.; R. DON DEESON; AND PATRICK B. LYONS. ALSO PRESENT WERE .JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JEFFREY BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; VIRGINIA HARGREAVES AND JANICE W. CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERKS. NOT PRESENT WAS L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR, WHO WAS ON VACATION. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND REVEREND JAMES P. MCCLAIN, PASTOR, TREASURE COAST CATHEDRAL ASSEMBLIES OF GOD CHURCH GAVE THE INVOCATION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INTRODUCED PAUL PALMIOTTO, THE NEW COUNTY URBAN FORESTER. MR. PALMIOTTO INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE RECEIVED HIS EDUCATION IN SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, AND HAD WORKED AS A FORESTER IN FT. MYERS, FLORIDA BEFORE ACCEPTING THIS POSITION. COMMISSIONER LOY REQUESTED.ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM IN THE CLERK'S AGENDA REGARDING THE SPOUSE ABUSE PROGRAM. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM IN THE CLERKS AGENDA REGARDING THE SPOUSE ABUSE PROGRAM. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, 1980. COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 21, LINE 16, AFTER THE WORD "COVERED," THE PHRASE "NOT ONLY NOW BUT ALSO IN THE FUTURE," BE ADDED. ON PAGE 611 LINE 30, AFTER THE WORD "CALLED," THE WORDS ROVER THIRTY" BE ADDED. COMMISSIONER LOY SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 44, LINE 19, THE NAME "HUDNELL" BE CHANGED TO "HIGHTOWER." PAGE 10, LINE 91 THE NAME "Loy" BE CHANGED TO "LYONS." e� 42 Bas MAR 51990 MAR 51900 BOO 42 FAGF807 COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 12, THIRD PARAGRAPH, THE PHRASE 'BASED UPON THE HARDSHIP AS PRESENTED BY COORDINATOR THOMAS AND THE HISTORY OF THIS CASE," BE ADDED AFTER THE WORD "BOARD." THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 201 1980, AS WRITTEN. COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED A STATEMENT SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE CLERKS AGENDA ADVISING THAT THE PISTOL PERMIT APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET ACCORDING TO ORDINANCE 79-27. COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION BE GIVEN ON THE CLERKS AGENDA REGARDING OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM FOR THOMAS NATHANIEL SNELL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR JUDITH A. WAKEFIELD, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR, AND PETE SPYKE, AGRICULTURAL SPECIALIST, AS FOLLOWS: JUDITH A. WAKEFIELD: MARCH 21 (PM) ORLANDO MARINE SCIENCE 4-H CLUB SPECIAL PROJECT TOUR OF SEA WORLD. THEY HAVE A SPECIAL TOUR AND PRICE FOR 4 -HERS. MARCH 28-30 (PM) 4-H CAMP 4-H TEEN RETREAT . MCQUARR I E NOTE: THE STATE HOME ECONOMICS CONVENTION IS MARCH 21-22, BUT AS SHE HAD TO GET THE SEA WORLD RESERVATION IN AUGUST, AND THE 4 -HERS KNEW ABOUT IT, SHE WILL FORGO THE CONVENTION THIS YEAR. PETE SPYKE: FEBRUARY 19 PALATKA ST. .JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WORKSHOP ON PHASE 1 OF THE UPPER ST. .JOHNS BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN. THE WORK- SHOP WAS CALLED ON SHORT NOTICE, SO PRIOR APPROVAL WAS IMPOSSIBLE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT TENTATIVELY APPROVED THE TRAVEL PENDING FINAL APPROVAL BY THE BOARD. MAR X80 MARCH 20 BARTOW QUARTERLY CITRUS AGENTS' MEETING. SPRING QUARTER JS DEVOTED TO PROGRAM PLANNING FOR FY 80-81. MARCH/ KENNEDY NASA RECENTLY PARTICIPATED IN A PROJECT WITH APRIL SPACE CENTER HIM IN WHICH THEY MADE A REMOTE SENSING SPECTRO- RADIOMETER FLIGHT OVER A SERIES OF CITRUS GROVE BLOCKS ON A COLD NIGHT. THEY WERE TRYING TO GAIN MORE INFORMATION ON FLOOD AND LOW-VOLUME • IRRIGATION USED AS A COLD PROTECTION MEASURE, HE WOULD LIKE TO SPEND A COUPLE DAYS AT THE SPACE CENTER EXAMINING THE DATA ON AN IMAGE 100 COMPUTER. THIS IS NOT A UNIVERSITY PROJECT. NASA AGREED TO FUND THE PROJECT IF HE WOULD HELP WITH THE DATA INTERPRETATION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLLS, COUNTY COURT, FEBRUARY TERM, 1980, IN THE AMOUNT OF $160.76; AND CIRCUIT COURT, FALL TERM, 19801 IN THE AMOUNTS OF $276.76 AND $25,24. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC RECORDS SUCH AS OLD YEARS VOUCHERS AND RECEIPTS, AS PER THE FOLLOWING AUTHORIZATION FROM THE DIVISION OF ARCHIVES; MAR 51980 3 aooK 42 F,E808 MAR 51980 BOOK 4,Gq PACE $Q ;ji NOTICE OF INTENT t STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Archives. History and � TO DESTROY SCHEDULED RECORDS (F NOTICE NO. 1 PAGE 1 OF PAGES Rocords Management Forin DS RM 107 0 72) J AND DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE 77 1. AGENCY 2. DIVISION 3. BUREAU 4. ADDRESS (Street, City and Zip Code) 5. CONTACT (Name & Telephone Number) P.O. box 1028 Mrs. Freda Wright Vero Beach, Florida 32960 1-305-569-1200 ® 6. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 8 are to be disposed of in the manner �' RECEIVED RECEIVED checked below: a. Destruction U b. Microfilming and Destruction TO: AN �� {�O� c. Other DEPARTMENT OF STAT — .. DIVISION OF ARCHIVES, HISTORY AND RECORDS MANAGET 7. SUBMITTED BY: TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA $3 t ° I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below and th t any audit requirements for the records have pen fully satisfie . Signature Date i {- ('Hurt Fr 7�r-1� (`1 C' (i rc�l i ype Name 8 it e 8. RECORD SERIES LIST r36,ff I. a. b. t, d• Destruction Schedule Item Title Inclusive Volume Action and Date ate ter Nu, No. Datesomp Approval 1 1 Receipts used as original documents 1959 50 Cu. F for recording monies received by 1976 the Board of County Commissioners. 1 2 Vouchers used as original documents_ 1959 80 Cu. Ft for recording monies disbursed by 1976 the Board of County Cce1t<nissioners. 9 DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION 10. DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE • The above listed records have been disposed of in the manner and on Disposal for above listed records is authorized. Any delettons or the date shown to column f. modifications ar ted in red. 19 A zy Signature Date Type Name and Title UuiKaot. Chvision Archi s, istory ,��.�,,� le and Records Management Witness ;ji u ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE GRANT FOR THE SPOUSE ABUSE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN. E MAR 51980 5 BOOK 42 PA,,,F Q��,, MAR 5 �0 BOOK .42 mcg 8th r AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this -5th day of March 1980, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY and SPOUSE ABUSE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC., hereinafter referred to as SPOUSE ABUSE. WHEREAS, Spouse Abuse has requested the County to sponsor a grant, copy of which is filed by the Executive Director, Diane M. Zimberoff and is attached to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, County is willing to sponsor the grant application, condition upon Spouse Abuse providing County with an annual audit evidencing the use of all funds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises the parties agree as follows: 1. County shall sponsor grant application by Spouse Abuse as submitted in the attached exhibit and governmental officials shall be authorized to sign appropriate documents. 2. Spouse Abuse shall be responsible for receipt and dis- bursement of funds including the grant monies received and shall provide County, at the completion of the program, or within one (1) year from date, an audit prepared by a Certified Public Account- ing firm, reflecting income and expenditures incurred by Spouse Abuse pursuant to the Help For Battered Homes Program attached hereto. 3. Spouse Abuse agrees to be responsible for receipts and proper expenditure of all funds pursuant to the attached Battered Homes application and in the event Spouse Abuse fails to provide County with the audit required, County may obtain said audit, collect costs thereof from Spouse Abuse, including court costs and Attorney's fees. ATTEST: Freda Wr gR Cl.erik AU yIA114 4s.Q-. MAR 80 BOARD OF COUNTY COTTISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By L. _ Wi a d W. Siebert, Jr.' Chairman SPOUSE ABUSE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC. By = �)ti — - - - -- _I of THE S1'41 v � k• 00 W E SpJ54 JOHN G. BURKE DIVISION DIRECTOR STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING AND ASSISTANCE • February 27, 1980 Honorable William C. Wodtke, Jr., Chairman Indian River County Board of Commissioners County Courthouse, 2145 14 Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Mr. Wodtke: BOBGRAHAM GOVERNOR JOAN M. HEGGEN CRETARY 79-AA-06-AE01 Help for Battered Homes The Florida Department of Community Affairs wishes to extend congratulations to Indian River County for receiving an action grant award to support the above project under the special conditions attached to the grant award certificate, which is enclosed. To complete the processing of the grant award, we are transmitting the following forms which should be completed and returned as indicated: Form BCJPA-1 - As soon as possible so that necessary funds can be drawn from the Federal Treasury. Certificate of Acceptance Within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt by you. This certificate represents official acceptance of the grant and'must be received by the Bureau prior to the drawdown of any project funds. Also enclosed is a listing of.comman audit findings, which we believe you will find helpful in the administration of this award. An Administration Manual will be forwarded to the project director containing other necessary forms which are to be completed and returned to the Bureau of Criminal Justice. Once again, we are pleased that your project has been awarded. If we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to advise. Sincerely, J ce D. Peterside Bureau Chief JDP/jc Enclosures cc: Diane M. Zimberoff Cliff Guillet BUREAU OF'CRIMINAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE ROOM 530 CARLTON BUILDING, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 (904) 488-6001 MAR 51980 Bornc 42;. PAGE 812 Lk JOHN G. BURKE DIVISION DIRECTOR SLATE OF FI0RIDA 1XP/1RINtN1_ OF CONiNIUNIlY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF PU[3LIC SAFE FY PLANNING AND ASSISI/\NCE BUREAU OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE ROOM 530 CARLTON BUILDING TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 (904) 488.8016 Operations (904) 488-0090 Administrative Services SUBGRANT AWARD CERTIFICATE eou Subgrantee: Indian River County Federal Funds: $14,334 Date of Award: February 22, 1980 State Required Cash Match: Grant Period: From: 1-1-80 To: 8-31-80 State Buy -In: $796 Project Title: He10 fo•_- RaftprpA Homes Local Required Cash Match: $,796 Local In -Kind Match: Grant Number: 79—AA-06—AE01 Total Project Cost: $15,926 42 PAcF.81 BOBGRAHAM GOVERNOR JOAN M. HEGGEN SECRETARY Program Area: Part B [ ] Part C Local kXI Part E [ ] JJDP [ ) Part C State [ ) DF [ ] Award is hereby made in the amount and for the period shown above of a grant under Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, P.L. 90-351, as amended, and the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, P.L. 93-415, as amended, to the above mentioned subgrantee and subject to any attached standard or special conditions. This award is subject to all applicable rules, regulations, and conditions as contained in the Administration Manttal for Subgrant Awards, Financial Management Circulars 744 and 74-7, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration's Financial Management for Planning and Action Grants (M 7100.1), and/or Guide for Discretionary Grant Programs (M 4500.1), and Law Enforcement Assistance Administration's Grant Manager Procurement Manual (M 1700.6). It is also subject to such further rules, regulations and policies as may be reasonably prescribed by the State or Federal Government consistent with the purposes and authorization of P.L. 90.351, as amended, and P.L. 93-415, as amended. This ,grant shall become effective on the beginning date of the grant period, provided that within thirty (30) days of the award execution date (below) a properly executed acceptance of Subgrant Award is returned to the Bureau of Criminal Justice Assistance. 9 Authorized Official /JOHN G. BURKE, DIVISION DIRECTOR February 22, 1980 Date Executed [ xx] This award is subject to special. conditions (attached). BCJA Revised 7-1-79 MiE5 isao � � a STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Cornmuruty Affairs Division of Public Safety Planning and Assistance BI)REAU OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE 530 Carlton Building Tallahassee. Florida 32301 SPECIAL CONDITIONS Grantee (Name of SPA1: Bureau of Criminal Justice Assistance Grant Number: 79—AA-06—AE01 Grant Title: Help for Battered Homes In addition to the General Conditions and Conditions Applicable to Fiscal Administration to which the grant is subject, it is also conditioned upon and subject to compliance with the following special conditions: 1. Approval is granted for Indian River County to contract on a sole source basis with Spouse Abuse of Indian River County, Inc. for the amount of $15,926 con- tingent upon the subgrantee submitting the contract for Bureau of Criminal Justice Assistance (BCJA) approval within thirty (30) days of the subgrant award date. 2. Within thirty (30) days of the.subgrant award date, the subgrantee must submit for BCJA approval a complete explanation of the functions/activities of the pro- ject by utilizing the attached "Activities and Timetable" chart. ADDITIONAL STANDARD CONDITIONS: 1. The subgrantee will include in their first quarterly progress report the degree to which this project complies with the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services' standards for spouse abuse shelters. • `� 900K 4,2., PAGE oi4•. MAR 51990 soox 42 PAGE 815 CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF SUBGRANT AWARD The subgrantee, through its authorized representative, acknowledges receipt and acceptance of subgrant award number 79-AA-06-AE01 in the amount of $ 15,926.00 *, for a project entitled Help for Battered Homes for the period of 1-1-80 to 8-31-80 in accordance with the statement of work contained in the subgrant application, and subject to the Bureau of Criminal Justice's attached standard subgrant conditions governing subgrants, as well as any attached special conditions. Accepted for the Subgrantee: 3-5-80 (Signature of Authorized Official) (Date of Acceptance) Willard W. Siebert, Jr. Chairman Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, Florida (Typed Name and Title of Official) *REQUIRED MATCH State General Revenue $---796,00- Local 796.00Local Hard Cash $_ 796.00 MA 1990 r THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK: REPORT OF JUVENILES IN JAIL OR DELIVERED TO JAIL DURING THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 1980. REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, CIRCUIT COURT, FEBRUARY, 1980. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NEXT DISCUSSED THE APPOINTMENT OF LIAISON BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER Loy, THAT PETE SPYKE CONTINUE ON AS THE LIAISON BETWEEN THE ST. .JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY. THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT HE VIEWS WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE YEARS TO COME AS ONE OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL AND VITAL FORCES IN THE COUNTY. HE EMPHASIZED THAT THIS WILL BE A VERY ACTIVE AND IMPORTANT POSITION AND WHOEVER THE BOARD APPOINTS SHOULD HAVE SOME EXPERTISE AND BE ABLE TO ACTIVELY COMMUNICATE WITH THE COMMISSIONERS. COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED DELAYING THE APPOINTMENT AND THAT THE BOARD TAKE A FEW WEEKS TO THINK ABOUT IT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE MENTIONED THAT .JOHN TRIPSON SERVES AS A COMMITTEE MEMBER ON THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT SOMEBODY OUGHT TO BE REPORTING DIRECTLY TO THE COMMISSION FROM THIS DISTRICT.* COMMISSIONER WODTKE WITHDREW HIS MOTION, AND COMMISSIONER Loy WITHDREW HER SECOND. COMMISSIONER LYONS ADVISED THE BOARD THAT HE WOULD LOOK FURTHER INTO THE MATTER. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NEXT DISCUSSED THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL AND REPORTED THAT THE BOARD OF -PUBLIC INSTRUCTION HAS RECOMMENDED DR. DOUGLAS KING. HE CONTINUED THAT AFTER DISCUSSION WITH THE ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE, IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE REPRESEN- TATIVE FOR THE COUNTY. COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE APPOINTEES OF THE BOARD DO NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE PART OF THE COUNTY STAFF. 8 BOOK 01 ., l MAR 5 i9a0 eoox42 SCE 817 COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THAT IN MR. REGAN'S POSITION IN WORKING WITH HOUSING AND IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, AND CONSIDERING SOME OF THE PROBLEMS THAT THE EOC HAS HAD, IT MIGHT PUT HIM, AS WELL AS THE COUNTY, IN A MORE AWKWARD POSITION. COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT HE WAS INCLINED TO AGREE WITH HIM. DISCUSSION ENSUED ALONG THOSE LINES AND SINCE THERE MIGHT BE A POSSIBILITY OF A CONFLICT IN APPOINTING MR. REGAN, IT WAS DECIDED TO RESCHEDULE THIS APPOINTMENT ON A FUTURE AGENDA, COMMISSIONER LOY EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT APPOINTING A PERSON WHO IS ALREADY HEAVILY INVOLVED IN COUNTY ACTIVITIES AND FELT THIS APPOINTMENT SHOULD BE POSTPONED AT THIS TIME. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION Noi 80-25 APPOINTING DR. DOUGLAS KING TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL. nijjmj 1980 � RESOLUTION NO. 80-25 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That DR. DOUGLAS KING is hereby appointed to serve on the Board of Directors of the Economic -Opportunities of Indian River County, Inc. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 5th day of March, 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY CODMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 01 By W1. lard Z.Si4eed t, Jr., C airman Attest: Freda Wright, Clerk R PEAR 51990 ,�'� MAR 51980 eooK 42 MGF 819 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN INTRODUCED KEVIN HENDERSON OF THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, WHO PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING MODEL OUTLINE FOR A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY PROGRAM: A MODEL OUTLINE FOR A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY PROGRAM (DRAFT) I. ENERGY EMERGENCY PLAN (fuel shortages) A. Federal and State Responses to Energy Emergencies B. Local Response to Energy Emergencies I. Administrative structure and degree of local control over fuels 2. Assessment of local governments' essential energy needs a. emergency services b. utilities, sanitation, etc. i i 3. Assessment of other needs, public and private 4. Priority .users plan for local government services 5. Ordinances or regulations for equitable private sector fuel distribution II. GOVERNMENT OPERATION AND EFFICIENT ENERGY USE A. Internal Energy Management 1. Commitment and responsibilities of governing board 2. Administrative/staff energy management structure and responsibilities 3. Data collection and reporting 4. Purchasing practices (life cycle costing, etc.) B. Areas of Opportunity for Energy Savings 1. Existing buildings and energy audits 2. Fleet management 3. Utilities 4. Street lighting 5. Solid waste and resource recovery MA� 1980 "1 . _ III. LONG RANGE PLANNING AND ENERGY A. Land Use Regulation 1.• Efficient development and land use patterns a. mixed land uses I b. infilling c. conservation of natural ecosystems 2. Subdivision regulations a. street and building orientation i b. site design (clustering, road specs, utilities, etc.) 3. Other -ordinances a. exemptions to existing ordinances and regulations b. landscape ordinances c. solar access protection d. extension of services and utilities B. Construction 1. Energy efficient building codes for new construction 2. Retrofit of existing -structures for energy efficiency 3. Transportation a. network planning b. alternative transit modes 4. Extension of services C. Conservation and Efficient Use of Natural Systems 1. Water (aquifer recharge, storage, pollution control) 2. Air quality 3. Preservation of natural ecosystems a. transfer of development rights b. shoreline setbacks c. vegetation protection MAR 519042 boos , 42. fsu 821 MR. HENDERSON EXPLAINED ITEM I, THE ENERGY EMERGENCY PLAN, STATED THERE WAS A GREAT DEAL OF UNCERTAINTY REGARDING THE FUEL SHORTAGE, AND THOUGHT IT WAS IN EVERYONE IS BEST INTEREST TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE STATE AND FEDERAL RESPONSES. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE ARE CERTAIN FUEL CONSUMPTIVE USES THAT ARE ESSENTIAL WHICH HAVE TO BE CARRIED ON REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH FUEL IS AVAILABLE. MR. HENDERSON FELT THERE SHOULD BE SOME SCRUTINY OF COUNTY ORDINANCES, SHOULD A SHORTAGE OCCUR, SO THAT THE PRIVATE SECTOR WOULD NOT Bt AFFECTED. HE ADDED THAT THE ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE IS THE MAIN POINT OF ITEM II, WHICH WOULD ACCOUNT FOR ALL THE ENERGY CONSUMPTION. MR. HENDERSON EXPLAINED THERE ARE OTHER SUCCESSFUL PROGRAMS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY, AND ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS FOR A GOVERNMENT ENERGY PROGRAM IS THE GOVERNING BOARD BEHIND IT. HE STRESSED HAVING AN ACCURATE ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE. MR. HENDERSON ADVISED THE BOARD THERE IS A PROGRAM THAT IS PARTIALLY FUNDED THROUGH FEDERAL GRANTS. HE REPORTED THAT THERE ARE NEW BULBS THAT CAN BE USED IN STREET LIGHTING FOR MORE EFFICIENCY; VANDALISM COULD BE REDUCED IF THERE WAS NO LIGHTING IN CERTAIN AREAS, AS CHILDREN DO NOT LIKE THE DARK. MR. HENDERSON EXPLAINED THAT ITEM III, LONG RANGE PLANNING AND ENERGY, IS THE LEAST SECURE. HE CONTINUED THAT IN AREAS OF HIGH GROWTH, THE PLANNERS OF LAND USE WILL DETERMINE THE FUTURE ENERGY USE. MR. HENDERSON NOTED THAT THE GOVERNOR S OFFICE IS TAKING SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS VERY SERIOUSLY AND TRYING TO COME UP WITH A SCHEME WHICH WOULD BE MORE ENERGY-EFFICIENT. HE FELT SITE DESIGN, SUCH AS CLUSTER HOUSING, WOULD ALSO MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE, AND NOTED THAT ORDINANCES MIGHT HAVE TO BE ADOPTED IN ORDER TO SAVE ENERGY. HE EXPLAINED THAT IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION, EXISTING BUILDINGS COULD BE IMPROVED TO BE MORE EFFICIENT, AND HE FELT SUBDIVISION ROADS COULD BE MADE NARROWER. MR. HENDERSON CON- CLUDED THAT THOSE WERE THE AREAS THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT COULD USE TO DEVELOP AN ENERGY PROGRAM, WHICH HE FELT WAS A VERY BENEFICIAL PROGRAM. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED WHAT KIND OF ASSISTANCE THE COUNTY COULD EXPECT TO RECEIVE FROM THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. MAS 1980 mll MR. HENDERSON EXPLAINED THAT THEIR CONTRACT EXPIRED LAST FRIDAY BUT THE GOVERNORS OFFICE IS OFFERING THEM A NEW CONTRACT WHICH WOULD CONCENTRATE ON PROVIDING EXTENSIVE ASSISTANCE, WITH FUNDING PROVISIONS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE LEFT THE MEETING AT 9:20 O'CLOCK A.M. CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR NUZIE ASKED WHY LOCAL GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN SLOW IN RESPONDING TO THE ENERGY PROGRAM. MR. HENDERSON FELT IT WAS A COMBINATION OF FACTORS THAT ARE VERY COMPLEX - SOME PEOPLE DID NOT BELIEVE WE HAD AN ENERGY PROBLEM, AND THE ATTITUDES OF THE PEOPLE HAD TO BE CHANGED CONCERNING THIS. HE CONTINUED THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE NOW FEEL THAT THERE IS AN ENERGY PROBLEM, AS THEY ARE SEEING MORE INTEREST AND ACTIVITY. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THERE HAS TO BE A TOTAL COMMITMENT ON THE PART OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO ESTABLISH AN ENERGY PROGRAM WHICH MEANS EXPENDING DOLLARS TO DO IT; ALSO IT REQUIRES ADDITIONAL STAFFING TO COME UP WITH AN ENERGY PROGRAM. HE STATED THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN RELUCTANT TO PLACE A BURDEN ON THE TAXPAYER. COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT ANY CHANGE IS PAINFUL AND HE EMPHASIZED THAT IN THE AREA OF PLANNING, OUR CONCEPTS IN THE COUNTY HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED AND ACCEPTED FOR A LONG TIME. HE NOTED THAT CLUSTER HOUSING, FROM AN ENERGY STANDPOINT, IS A GREAT IDEA BUT THE PEOPLE ARE USED TO SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING. COMMISSIONER LYONS ADDED THAT PEOPLE DO NOT NECESSARILY ACCEPT CHANGES UNLESS THEY UNDERSTAND THE REASON FOR IT, AND IT TAKES AN ORGANIZED APPROACH, SUCH AS AN AUDIT, TO GET STARTED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT THE FIRST THING NEEDED TO BE DONE WAS AN AUDIT. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT THE COUNTY HAS TAKEN A GIANT STRIDE IN ENERGY CONSERVATION BY LETTING THE CONTRACT TO RENOVATE THE COURTHOUSE AND THE OLD HOSPITAL. HE FELT THE AUDIT SHOULD BE DONE AFTER THE RENOVATIONS HAVE BEEN -MADE. PSR. HENDERSON STATED THE AUDIT SHOULD INCLUDE THE BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, ETC., TO SEE WHERE THE ENERGY IS BEING USED. HE ADDED THAT 51980 14 BOOK", pAtF, .J MAR 5 i9 o 42,.;%cE 823 AFTER YOU FIND OUT WHERE THE MOST ENERGY IS USED, YOU GET THE MOST SAVINGS FOR THE LEAST EFFORT, BUT FELT IT WOULD TAKE MORE THAN ONE FULL-TIME STAFF MEMBER FOR THIS PROJECT. PROGRAM. A. M. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INTERJECTED THAT IT MUST BE A LONG RANGE COMMISSIONER WODTKE RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 9:35 O'CLOCK COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THE JOB NEEDED TO BE DONE BUT SHOULD INCLUDE THE OPINION -FORMING CITIZENRY AS PART OF THE PROCESS, BECAUSE WHAT THE COUNTY MIGHT COME UP WITH MIGHT NOT BE SALABLE TO THEM. HE FELT THERE SHOULD BE A LARGER TENDENCY TOWARD MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING BUT THIS IS CONTRARY TO HOW THE COUNTY WAS BUILT. MR. HENDERSON ADVISED THAT THERE IS A GRANT PROGRAM WHICH WILL PAY FOR HALF THE COST FOR AUDITING THE BUILDINGS, AND THE RPC CAN ASSIST WITH INFORMATION ON THIS PROGRAM. HE MENTIONED THAT GOVERNOR GRAHAM SPOKE OF AN ENERGY TRUST FUND AT THE STATE LEVEL WHICH WOULD PROVIDE THE FUNDS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN ASKED MR. HENDERSON TO OBTAIN THE INFORMATION REGARDING THE GRANT PROGRAM FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS SO THAT HE CAN WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE ENERGY AUDIT. MR. HENDERSON THEN RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD PASS A RESOLUTION STATING THAT THIS IS THE POLICY OF THE BOARD, APPOINT SOMEONE TO PROCEED WITH THE PROGRAM, AND ADOPT IT AS THE RULE. HE MENTIONED THAT HE HAD SEVERAL SAMPLE RESOLUTIONS THE BOARD COULD CHOOSE FROM AND USE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED MR. HENDERSON TO SEE THAT PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER RECEIVED THE SAMPLE RESOLUTIONS, AND THANKED HIM FOR HIS PRESENTATION ON THE ENERGY PROGRAM. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE LIBRARY AGREEMENT RETRO- ACTIVELY. MAPjjj1980 IMIJ5 STATE AID TO LIBRARIES Agreement between STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES and the BOARD OF COUNTY C011MISSIONERS of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY This Agreement, made and entered into this 25th day of February 1980, by and between the State of Florida, P Department of State, Division of Library Services, hereinafter referred to as the DIVISION, and the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the DIVISION is authorized pursuant to Sections 257.17, 257.18, and 257.19, Florida Statutes, to administer operation, equalization, and establishment grants for public library service; and, WHEREAS, funds have been appropriated to the DIVISION under Sections 257.17, 257.18, and 257.19, Florida Statutes; and, WHEREAS, the COUNTY has made application and certified eligibility for receipt of a grant authorized under 257.17, Florida Statutes; and, WHEREAS, the COUNTY has centrally expended for the operation of public library service during the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978, the amount of $ 115,126 , exclusive of federal and state NOW THEREFORE, WITNESSETH THAT the parties hereto mutually agree, in execution of the Agreement, as follows: I The COUNTY agrees to expend gran funds awarded pursuant to this MAR 51980 Boa.y . 4n> ��E 4 o j n AIS, MAR 51980 -2- POOR 42 PAGE 825 Agreement in full compliance with the terms and conditions of Chapter 257, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 1B-2, Florida Administrative Code, relating to free public library service, and to provide access to financial" records when an audit review is deemed necessary by the DIVISION. II The DIVISION, for and in consideration of the COUNTY performance hereinunder, awards an operating grant in the amount of twelve thousand and fifty-one dollars ($ 12,051 ), to be released in quarterly allotments, in accordance with the schedule set forth in ATTACHMENT A. IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties hereto have agreed and executed the Agreement the date and year first above written. ueorge rarestne Secretary of tate State of Florida ATTEST: Clerk of he C'- - � —�' � , t ircult Court vice Chairman., Board of Count3 C mmissioners MAR mw80 ATTACHMENT A Quarterly Allotments October 1, 1979 $ 3,012.75 January 1, 1980 $ 3,012.75 April 1, 1980 $ 3;012,75 July 1, 1980 $ 3,012.75 Payments The first payment will be made on receipt of the signed contract. The third and fourth quarterly allotments will be processed for payment in April, 1980. e MAR 51980 42v .. 6 r MAR 51980 ooK 42 PAcf$�7 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS HAVE INVITED THE BOARD AND THEIR FRIENDS TO THE BANANA BOAT ON LARCH 10, 1980 AT 6:00 O'CLOCK P.M. THE BOARD ACCEPTED THEIR INVITATION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A.PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF MARCH AS "NATIONAL RED CROSS MONTH." CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN READ THE FOLLOWING PROCLAMATION: P R O C L A M A T I O N the AMERICAN RED CROSS is always there when disaster strikes; WHEREAS, the local County Chapter of the APIERCIAN RED CROSS is having a drive to increase the membership of the w:` local Chapter; and WHEREAS, the local Chapter of the AMERICAN RED CROSS performed many varied and important duties which helped prevent any loss of life and kept injuries to a minimum during the crisis of Hurricane David; and WHEREAS, the local Chapter of the AMERICAN RED CROSS provides many services to the County, including periodic blood pressure checks, C.P.R. courses and first aid courses; and WHEREAS, the AMERICAN RED CROSS, both on the national level and locally, provides aid to people in times of distress, such as fire or flood; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That Mr The Month of March shall be designated as: "NATIONAL RED CROSS MONTH" BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board expresses its appreciation to the AMERICAN RED CROSS for the good work it has done both on the National and Local level for the benefit of the Community. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Willard W. Siebert, Jr., Chairman 42, 40 828 MAR 5 1980 svK 42 pocf 829 SHERIFF .JOYCE REQUESTED AN EMERGENCY ITEM BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA REGARDING BIDS FOR REMODELING THE JAIL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE AGENDA AS REQUESTED BY SHERIFFJOYCE. SHERIFF .JOYCE EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD THAT HE HAS ENDEAVORED TO GET BIDS FOR REDOING THE BOOKING ROOM AND THE RECREATION AREA SINCE THE FIRST PART OF DECEMBER, 1979. _HE THEN READ THE FOLLOWING BIDS: RECREATION AREA: WILBUR A. LARKIN $1,4$$.00 HERCULES FENCE $3,725.47 BOOKING ROOM: BARRY'S ORNAMENTAL IRON, INC. $2,170.00 SOUNDPROOF ROOM: LAPORTE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $2,675.00 HEDIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. $10,780.00 THE SHERIFF FELT THE LOW BIDS WERE IN LINE AND REQUESTED THE ADMINIS- TRATOR STUDY THE DRAWINGS, REVIEW THE BIDS; AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. HE CONTINUED THAT IN SELECTING THE LOW BID IN EACH CATEGORY, THE TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE EXPENDED FOR THE THREE JOBS WOULD BE $6,333.00. COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE EXERCISE YARD AND SHERIFF JOYCE ADVISED HIM IT WAS 50 FEET SQUARE. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER LYONS, THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE SHERIFF'S RECOMMENDATION NOW, INSTEAD OF WAITING TWO WEEKS, FOR THE LOW BIDS FOR EACH PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZE THE JOB TO BE DONE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ADMINISTRATOR, AFTER HE HAS CHECKED THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED HOLDING THE DECISION AS TO WHERE THE FUNDS WILL BE DERIVED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAR •+ �������( Page No. of Pages 1 iu 81.. i,d :,•.x'14 fLr x.. Y`C. + - •FOIRIT Ph !ane 461.341 a Ii PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE STREET JOB NAME 60 CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: ,)u ,piY. e .i ��..5�.-�. _ .. i� l: r�i�;a- t'.�:r?ti A k fence.. . � '1_ ti i.1 :.i.Li.i�., iJC...i. 1s •Y'. .i. a.�.a r., - Jrtw'L0 Wt f rapDSP hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: dollars Payment to be made as follows: I AU material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike s Any deviation from above specifica• Authorized manner according to standard practices. alteration or Signature tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents Note: This proposal may be or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance, Our workers are fully covered by workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. MAR 51980 BOOK 4� ME$ 1 r111 Page No. of Papes 1 Barry's Ornamental Iron, Inc. Aluminum & Steel Fabrication & Welding 1164 18th Place VERO BEACH, FL 32960 olsn". rcA_Accc l/ raptanrr tit ropow ! -The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature PORK 110 COPTNIONT 1000 • WIN ENO♦,ANo auSINESS SERVICE, INC. GROTON. PASS. 01450 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE I.R.C. Sheriff's Department March 4, 1980 STREET 1725 17th Avenue JOB NAME CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION Vero Beach, Florida 32960 ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: 1. Booking Room A. Furnish and install new floor to ceiling security screens and partitions with doors. 2. West Exterior Wall A. Furnish and install new 1/4" steel channel door frames. B. Remove existing hinge pins and install on new steel channel frames. C. Remake existing steel door and install same on new steel channel frame. 3. All materials to be prime shop coat paint. I, f We Frop0SF hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: Two Thousand, One Hundred Seventydollars 2,170.00 Payment to be made as follows: ($ I All material is guaranteed to be ass / specified. All work to be completed m a workmanlike C. � manner according to / standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above speafrca. Authorized tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an Signature extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, act relents of delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Note: This proposal Tay be ` Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by ua If not .... m.A u..1t— l/ raptanrr tit ropow ! -The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature PORK 110 COPTNIONT 1000 • WIN ENO♦,ANo auSINESS SERVICE, INC. GROTON. PASS. 01450 F — I B`I 'fi,' cLaPorte Constructioq, f qc Custom Built Homes • Additions • Alterations P.O. Box 6312, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (305) 562-9233 March 4, 1980 i1roposal to: Jndian river County Sheriffs Dept. Attention. Doyle Stroud Proposed work to be done: Cut out block wall for a 3' metal exterior door Take out 1216" petition, 14'petiLion, 8' petition Move water fountain Build two 4' petitions, cover with 5/8" AC plywood Cover ceilings in rooms 8'x 141, 713"x 619" with 5/8" AC plywood Cover three walls with 5/8" AC plywood Formica three tables 45"x 24" Replace 30" solid door Place shoe mold at bottom of all plywood walls Cover five rooms with 12"x 12" floor tile. 721 sq. ft. Labor and material Total Price t42,675.00 3oB LaPorte Construction, Inc. n it LIAR 51980 'fie MAR 51980 DEAN F. LUETHJE, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., APPROACHED THE BOARD IN REGARD TO A REQUEST FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF HIDEAWAY COVE SUBDIVISION. HE NOTED THAT THE SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED 500' SOUTH OF ROUND ISLAND, CONTAINS THREE LOTS, AND THE ROAD IS PRIVATE. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER COMMENTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT DID NOT HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE PLAT UNTIL YESTERDAY AND A NOTATION REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY WAS MISSING, WHICH IS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ON THE FINAL PLAT. HE CONTINUED THAT THE CUL DE SAC WAS ONLY 40' WIDE AND FELT IT SHOULD BE LARGER; ACCORDING TO GOOD DESIGN PRACTICE, 45' IS A MAXIMUM FOR A REGULAR ROADWAY. COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHAT WAS CALLED FOR IN THE REGULATIONS. MR. REVER REPORTED THERE IS NOTHING IN THE REGULATIONS DETERMINING WHAT THE MINIMUM TURNING RADIUS IN A CUL DE SAC SHOULD BE, AND HE FELT 50' WAS PROBABLY THE MOST DESIRABLE. COMMISSIONER LOY COMMENTED THAT IF THE REGULATION WAS NOT WRITTEN DOWN, SHE DID NOT FEEL IT COULD BE REQUIRED. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED CONCERNING THE CUL DE SAC AND IT WAS AGREED THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME CRITERIA FOR THE AVERAGE ROADWAY AND FROM THAT, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT COULD MAKE THEIR DEVIATIONS, AS EACH DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE DIFFERENT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF HIDEAWAY COVE SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO THE NOTATION BEING ADDED TO THE PLAT AS TO THE STATUS OF THE PROPERTY ADJOINING TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH. DEAN F. LEUTHJE, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., NEXT REQUESTED FINAL APPROVAL OF KINGSWAY SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON KINGS HIGHWAY AND BARBER AVENUE, WHICH CONTAINS 31 LOTS AND EACH ARE 1/2 ACRE IN SIZE. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER MENTIONED AS A POINT OF INFORMATION THAT THE CUL DE SAC HAD A 40' RADIUS. COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO CHANGE THE RULES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREAM, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF KINGSWAY SUBDIVISION. MA%1&1980 25 ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE COUNTY SHOULD BE GIVEN A DEED FROM ARTHUR K. WILSON, OWNER, FOR THE ADDITIONAL 15'* RIGHT- OF-WAY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO RESCIND THE PREVIOUS MOTION. ON -MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF KINGSWAY SUB- DIVISION, SUBJECT TO THE RECEIPT OF A DEED FOR THE 15' RIGHT-OF-WAY ON KINGS HIGHWAY. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER APPROACHED THE BOARD REGARDING OLD SUGAR MILL ESTATES #2 AND WANTED IT NOTED FOR THE RECORD THAT A CUL DE SAC HAS BEEN BUILT ON 13TH PLACE, WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE PLAN. HE CONTINUED THAT A ROAD IS INTENDED TO GO THROUGH BUT WAS CONCERNED THAT THE CUL DE SAC MIGHT BE LEFT THERE INSTEAD. COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT THE DEVELOPER IS GOING TO BUILD THE ROAD, AND A TEMPORARY CUL DE SAC IS BEING USED AT THIS TIME. THE ATTORNEY WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE EASEMENT IN THE SUB- DIVISION AND FELT WHEN THE MOTION WAS MADE, IT SHOULD BE CONDITIONED UPON THE COUNTY ACCEPTING A 10' EASEMENT; AND THE DOCUMENT SHOULD BE AN EASEMENT DEED. HE ADDED THAT THE SUM OF MONEY TO BE PLACED IN ESCROW SHOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL FACTOR TO CONSIDER. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THE BOARD SHOULD CONSIDER THESE MATTERS LATER -WHEN ENGINEER JAMES BEINDORF IS PRESENT. THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE FINAL APPROVAL REQUEST OF SEAGROVE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 4, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR PRESENTED A DRAWING TO THE BOARD. COMMISSIONER LYONS INTERJECTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A DRAWING OF WHAT THEY ARE APPROVING. COMMISSIONER LOY COMMENTED THAT WHILE SHE SHARED THE DESIRE TO SEE WHAT THE BOARD IS WORKING ON, THESE DRAWINGS ARE ON FILE AND THOUGHT THE COMMISSIONERS SHOULD MAKE THE EFFORT TO LOOK AT THEM, 26 19 MAR 51980 _4: MAR 51980...:1009 42 Vic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® INDIAN RIVER SAFETY COUNCIL P.O. BOX 132 . VERO BEACH, FLORIDA • 32960 - February 22, 1980 Zr Z , The Honorable Willard W. Siebert, Jr. Chairman Board County Commission 2145 14th Avenue Indian River County Courthouse Vero Beach, Florida 32960 gQ RQ couITv i `' Dear Sir, z, It is the collective attitude of the Indian River Safety Council that a more concerted effort should be made to com- plete facilities for bicycle travel within the County and City. in furtherance of this goal, the Safety Council respectfully recommends that local zoning ordinances be amended to require curb cuts and bicycle paths in all site plan approvals for future subdivision developments. This change would ensure the creation of needed paths without the expenditure of future tax dollars. The Indian River Safety Council respectfully submits this proposal to the County Commission with the sincere hope that this can be implemented in the near future. n ;Re pectfully yours, Scott B. Bing President SBB/abs COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPORTED THAT AT A MEETING RECENTLY, .JOE j.DLETTE AGREED TO SERVE WITH HIM ON THE CENSUS COMMITTEE, AND THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS HAS AGREED THAT HIS STAFF WILL TRY TO GET A COMPLETE COUNT ON THE CENSUS. HE CONTINUED THAT RAY DUBOSE, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE DIRECTOR, ALSO HAS AGREED TO SERVE WITH HIM. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MEETING NEXT WEEK INVITING REPRESENTATIVES FROM ALL AGENCIES, CIVIC GROUPS, ORGANIZATIONS, SOCIETIES, ASSOCIATIONS, ETC., TO TALK ABOUT THE CENSUS — WHAT USE IT WILL BE PUT T0, AND THE DIRE NEED FOR HAVING THE FORMS FILLED OUT PROPERLY. HE THEN ASKED THE BOARDS HELP IN FINDING SPEAKERS TO MAR 5 19 80 28 MAR 51980 TALK TO THE VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. WOK 42 F%#E 8:37 COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT HE IS GOING TO CONTACT ALL THE MAYORS OF MUNICIPALITIES TO GET THEIR SUPPORT AND ADVISE THEM WHAT THE CENSUS COMMITTEE IS TRYING TO DO IN THE COUNTY'S BEHALF, AS THEIR REVENUE SHARING WILL DEPEND ON THE CENSUS COUNT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ADVISED THAT HE SHOULD BE READY AT THE NEXT MEETING TO RECOMMEND MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE BEACH PRESERVA- TION AND RESTORATION COMMITTEE. COMMISSIONER LOY ADVISED THAT THE AUDIT COMMITTEE WILL MEET AT 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. ON FRIDAY, MARCH 7, 1980 IN THE COUNTY COMMISSION ROOM TO TRY TO MAKE A SELECTION OF THE TOP 2 OR 3 AUDITORS TO BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE THEN ASKED THE BOARD'S PERMISSION TO USE THE SERVICES OF BOARD SECRETARY FORLANI TO HELP HIM IN WORKING WITH THE CENSUS COMMITTEE, AND THE BOARD AGREED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED HAVING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD FIRST THING IN THE MORNING INSTEAD OF HAVING THEM AT 2:00 O'CLOCK IN THE AFTERNOON. COMMISSIONER DEESON COMMENTED THAT IT WOULD HELP THE PRESS MEET THEIR DEADLINE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DECIDED IT WOULD BE WORTH A TRY TO START THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AT 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT STARTING WITH THE NEXT ADVERTISEMENT FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, IT SHOULD BE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD AT 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M. COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THE TIME IS COMING SOON WHEN THE BOARD WILL HAVE TO HAVE WEEKLY MEETINGS. HE COMMENTED THAT IF THE BOARD MET THE FIRST FOUR WEDNESDAYS OF EVERY MONTH, THERE WOULD BE FIVE TIMES A YEAR WHEN THE FIFTH WEDNESDAY WOULD BE A DAY OFF. PETER G. ROBINSO.N APPROACHED THE .BOARD TO REQUEST FINAL APPROVAL OF LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION, UNIT N0. 3. ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT ALL THE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET, THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS ARE IN ORDER, AND HE HAS RECEIVED A CHECK FROM LAUREL BUILDERS, INC. FOR $94,745.15. HE ADVISED THE BOARD HE HAS A LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 25TH FROM DICKERSON, INC. VERIFYING THAT THEY HAVE A VALID CONTRACT WITH LAUREL BUILDERS, INC., AND A LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 29TH FROM LAUREL BUILDERS, INC. WITH AN ESCALATION CLAUSE STATING THEY WILL PAY THE DIFFERENCE IF THE BOND IS NOT HIGH ENOUGH. THE ADMINISTRATOR SUGGESTED THE BOARD MAKE THE ESCALATION CLAUSE A STANDARD REQUIREMENT IN THE REGULATIONS AND THAT THE CONTRACTORS BE BONDED, AS HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE COUNTY PROTECTED IN ALL WAYS. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT, BUT THE ATTORNEY FELT THIS SHOULD BE HANDLED SEPARATELY. HE ADDED THAT THERE ARE EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE LIGHTING, BUT ALL WE ARE TALKING.ABOUT RIGHT NOW IS THE PLAT. ON POTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION, UNIT N0. 3, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND THE ATTORNEY, AS TO THE FEBRUARY 25TH LETTER FROM DICKERSON, INC., AND THE FEBRUARY 29TH LETTER FROM LAUREL HOMES, INC., AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN FOR THE TRI -PARTY ESCROW AGREEMENT, AND THE PLAT. B' ; " LIAR 5 30 1990 � ¢: °42 �:� r MAR 51980 WOK 4 �u $.39 NONE :07-6020 P, O DRAWER 710 39.69.6 February 25, 1980 Mr. Jack Jennings Indian River County Admin. 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 Dear Air. Jennings: Reference: Laurelwood, Unit 3 Our Job No. H-4340 This letter will serve to verify the fact that the Dickerson Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries has a firm and valid contract with Laurel Builders, Inc., to complete the subdivision development improvements on Laurelwood, Unit 3. If you have any further questions pertaining to this, please give me a call. regards. Very truly yours, 711E DIaMIS N GROUP, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES OLL- n s R. Widmann, President JR1G : slm Y MAS 1980 �- - P. O. BOX 789 ® FERN PARK ■ FLORIDA 32790 TELEPHONE 891.2211 February 29, 1980 Mr. Jack G. Jennino-s County Administrator Indian River County Courthouse Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Re: Laurelwood, Unit 3 Indian River County Dear Mr. Jennings: This will confirm that Laurel Builders has a firm and valid contract with Dickerson, Inc. of Stuart, Florida, for the construction and installation of Laurelwood, Unit 3 subdivision development improvements, as evidenced by the attached ?ebruary 25, 1980 letter from James R. Widmann, Vice President. If, in the unlikely event, there is a quantity overrun or price increase prior to completion of construction, Laurel Builders will pay said increase and finish Laurelwood, Unit 3 improvements. Yours truly, LAUREL BUILDERS, INC. Robert T. Shutts Executive Vice President R`PS/eh cc: Peter G. Robinson MAR 5 19 00 42 84.0 MAR 51980 boot �� mcg TRI -PARTY ESCROW AGREEMENT= THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 15th day of February, 1980, by and between LAUREL BUILDERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Developer of the subdivision LAURELWOOD, UNIT 3, and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, ?LORIDA. W I T N E S S E T Hs 1. The Developer hereby deposits in escrow with the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, the sum of NINETY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY FIVE AND 15/100 ($94,745.15) DOLLARS, to guarantee that street paving and storm drainage improve- ments set forth on plans and specifications for Laurelwood, Unit 3, will be fully completed and paid for. Said funds have been furnished by BANCSHARES PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation. 2. The BOARD agrees to hold said funds and to pay the same out in the following manner: (a) To the Developer upon request and upon proof satis- factory to the BOARD that work has progressed satisfactorily to the state of development for which the payment is made, said proof to in- clude a Certificate to that effect signed by the Developer and the County Administrator, and upon proof satisfactory to the BOARD that all bills therefor have been paid to date, including, but not limit- ing thereto, bills for surveying, engineering, and land clearing, and work and material used in the street paving and storm drainage facil- ities which are included in the plan of development. (b) Upon determination that any portion or all of the said improvements have not been performed by the Developer within 365 calender days from the date of this Agreement, the BOARD is here- by authorized, but not obligated, to take over and perform any such uncompleted work and to use for such purposes the remaining funds so deposited in escrow. (c) Further, the BOARD is authorized to pay any bills for said improvements upon proof satisfactory to the BOARD that such claims are just and unpaid, and the Developer hereby consents to any such payments and authorizes and ratifies any such action on the part of the BOARD and agrees to protect and save harmless said BOARD from any claims of any persons whomsoever on account of any improvements which may not have been completed or Maid for. (d) Ten percent (10%) of the entire escrow deposit shall be held by the BOARD pending final completion of improvements and cer- tification by the Developer's engineer and the County Administrator that the improvements have been completed satisfactorily and that all work and materials have been paid in full. • (e) After the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS is satisfied that all work has been satisfactorily completed and all bills for work and materials have been paid, the BOARD shall return to BANCSHARES PROPERTIES, INC. at 150 S. E. 3rd Ave., Miami, Florida 33101, attn: Stella G. Nickas, Assistant Vice President any funds remaining in the escrow account. 1 of 2 THIS TRI -PARTY ESCROW AGREEMENT, signed and sealed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: X � �f��l�-�-'� •/` �.���� K �. fes{,( i.. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: 2 of 2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: C AIRMAN OFT BOARD / ATTEST CLERK OF THE BOARD LAUREL BUILDERS, INC. BY : / `,yLrt/T'v i- 7-c�;��� ROBERT T. SHUTTS EXECUTIVE VICEP SIDENT 1 r ATTEST: t. ,"` i . a MARTHA SEELY, SECRE7AKY BANCSHARES PROPERTIES, INC, BY Vice President ATTEST: Assistant Secretary MAR 51980 42 nu 843 .JIM FLYNN, OF THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING MEDICAL COVERAGE FOR THE COUNTY: COMPARISON 01' INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH, LIFE & ADD INSURANCE COVERAGE Accident N - BLUE CROSS Co. A. Co. B. Life Ins. & ADD 3,000 3,000 3,000 Benefit ( 1.00 per M) ( .63 Per M) ( .61 per M) _Hospital Room & 12,655.75; per year 151,869.00 Board (Semi -Private) 95.00 per day for 31 days, 3.00 per month, Deductable per then BC will pay 80 % of the -----------'--------------------------'--------'----- Calendar Year amount in excess of the 95.00 100 % 100 % Hospital Misc.. Max. (out of pocket) 93 @ expense 100 % (with the exception of calendar year for 700 (single) any extra charge for use of $00 (family) 11, 183.25, per year a television and for the issue LIFE & ADD 248 @ of an "admission kite. 80 % 100 % Sargi a� 1 P.Xp.,4e 100 % of the fee as compared with the Blue Cross Rate TOTAL FOR YEAR. . . . . . . . .$ 171,930.96 schedule ( Max of the 1st 333.00) then the employee pays his 100.00 deductable (unless otherwise satisfied). Blue Cross will then pay the next 3,000.00 at 80 %, the employee will then pay 20 % or 600.00. The balance is then paid by Blue Cross up to the life time benefit. 100 % 100 % Cost of Blood Covered NO YES YES Supplemental 248 employees. ( Accident N - and 155 employees have dependents) DeductableT 150.00 Max. life time 3,038.00; per year Benefit 250,000.00 155 @ Co -Insurance 12,655.75; per year 151,869.00 Insurance 3,000.00 3.00 per month, Deductable per 8,928.00 -----------'--------------------------'--------'----- Calendar Year 100 (single) I 200 (family) Max. (out of pocket) 93 @ for employee per 2690.49, per year calendar year for 700 (single) covered expenses. $00 (family) This Company will pay 100 % of the first 2,000.00 of all consolidated expenses before the employee pays his 100.00 deductable. then this company pays the next 2500.00 at 80 % and the employee pays 20 % or 500.00. This company will then pay the balance up to the life time benefit. 300.00 300.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 (single) 100 (single) 200 (family) 200 (family) Co. C. 3,000 ( .65 per M) 80 % 80 % 80 % YES 300.00 250,000.00 2,500.00 100 (single) 200 (family) 600 (single) 600 (single)* 600 (single) 700 (family) 700 (family)* 700 (family) * Max. for two consecutive calendar years. This comparison based on 248 employees. ( 93 employees are single and 155 employees have dependents) BLUE CROSS RATES: 93 @ 32.56 per month, 3,038.00; per year 36,336.00 HEALTH 155 @ 81.65 per month, 12,655.75; per year 151,869.00 LIFE & ADD 248 @ 3.00 per month, 744.00, per year 8,928.00 -----------'--------------------------'--------'----- TOTAL FOR YEAR.. . . . . . . . $ 197,133.00 COMPANY B RATES: 93 @ 28.93 per month, 2690.49, per year --"----- 32,285.88 HEALTH 155 @ 72.15'per month, 11, 183.25, per year 134,199.00 LIFE & ADD 248 @ 1.83 per month, 453.84 per year 5,446.08 TOTAL FOR YEAR. . . . . . . . .$ 171,930.96 *********SAVINGS*********** $ 251202.04 ****************** WiAP061980 5 MR. FLYNN FELT THAT FOR THE MONEY THE COUNTY IS PAYING TO BLUE CROSS, THEY SHOULD HAVE BETTER COVERAGE. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE SURGICAL EXPENSE FOR BLUE CROSS IS BASED UPON A RATE SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED IN 1960; ALSO, THE COST OF BLOOD IS NOT COVERED BY BLUE CROSS BUT WOULD BE IF THE COUNTY FORMED A BLOOD BANK. HE REVIEWED THE OTHER ITEMS ON THE COMPARISON SHEET AND FELT THE COUNTY COULD SAVE $25,202.04 A YEAR BY USING COMPANY B. MR. D. CHALMERS OF THE WARREN ZEUCH AGENCY, REPRESENTING METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., COMMENTED THAT ANY COMPANY WOULD DRAFT A PLAN ACCORDING TO THE COUNTY'S SPECIFICATIONS. HE EXPLAINED HOW THE SCHOOL BOARD HAS AN INSURANCE PLAN WHERE THEIR SURPLUS IS PUT INTO AN INTEREST-BEARING ACCOUNT. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT BLUE CROSS IS HOLDING OUR SURPLUS FUNDS IN CASE THE COUNTY HAS A BAD YEAR - IF WE CANCEL OUR POLICY WITH THEM, WE LOSE THE $45,000 THAT HAS BEEN ACCUMULATED, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE COUNTY HAD HIRED A CONSULTANT TO STUDY THE INSURANCE AND HE ADVISED THAT YOU CANNOT BID INSURANCE. HE COMMENTED THAT THERE WERE CERTAIN RULES AND REGULATIONS IN BIDDING; ALSO CERTAIN CRITERIA FOR PROPOSALS. MR. FLYNN FELT THE COUNTY COULD BID ON A BASE INSURANCE POLICY AND THEN NEGOTIATE. HE ADDED THAT A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE STATE INSURANCE COMMISSION CAN ASSIST THE COUNTY IN THIS MATTER. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THE COUNTY SHOULD SEE WHERE IT CAN GET MORE FOR ITS MONEY. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON SUGGESTED THE COUNTY DEVELOP PROPOSALS, EVALUATE THEM, AND USE THE SERVICES OF THE STATE INSURANCE REPRESENTATIVE TO HELP GET IT INTO THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. MR, FLYNN SUGGESTED HAVING THIS TAKE PLACE IN AUGUST, WHICH WILL GIVE THE COUNTY 30 DAYS TO MAKE THE TRANSITION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATION OFFICE 36 g MAR 51980 vZ­-0844 MAR 51980 ot6 42 PA.rE* 845' TO SEEK PROPOSALS FOR HEALTH, LIFE, AND ADDITIONAL INSURANCE COVERAGES AND REPORT THEIR FINDINGS TO THE BOARD. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY IS BECOMING A MORE COMPLEX BODY, THE REGULATIONS FROM TALLAHASSEE ARE MUCH GREATER, AND THE CONTACT THAT WE SEEM TO BE HAVING WITH TALLAHASSEE HAS INCREASED. HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE TO HAVE SOME DIRECT REPRESENTATION IN TALLAHASSEE WHO IS AVAILABLE FOR VARIOUS NEEDS THAT ARISE PERIODICALLY. THE ATTORNEY FELT WHOEVER WE BECAME INVOLVED WITH SHOULD HAVE LEGAL BACKGROUND AND HAVE EXPERIENCE IN TALLAHASSEE, AND SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY CONSIDER HIRING AN INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM ON AN HOURLY BASIS SO THAT THIS PERSON WOULD-BE AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY. THE ATTORNEY COMMENTED THAT WE NEED MORE INPUT AND REPRESENTATION DIRECTLY AT THE SOURCE OF WHERE THE RULES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING US ARE BEING MADE. MOTION WAS MADE.BY COMMISSIONER LYONS TO AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY TO USE THE SERVICES OF SUCH A PERSON OR A FIRM OF HIS CHOICE AS REQUIRED FROM TIME TO TIME. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT EXPRESSED INTEREST IN WHAT IT IS GOING TO COST THE COUNTY. THE ATTORNEY STATED HE WAS SURE THE BUDGET WILL BE OVER- RUN BY THE END OF THE YEAR IN THAT AREA BUT WOULD LIKE LIMITED HELP RIGHT NOW. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO COME BACK WITH SOME RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD AND, IN THE INTERIM, HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY COMPETENT HELP IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,500. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RECESSED AT 12:10 O'CLOCK P.M. FOR LUNCH AND RECONVENED AT 1:45 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT. ENGINEER JAMES BEINDORF CAME BEFORE THE BOARD IN REGARD TO FINAL APPROVAL OF OLD SUGAR MILL ESTATES, UNIT #2, AND NOTED THAT 37 MAIW1980 -- -- - HE HAD WRITTEN TO ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ITEMIZING THE WORK NOT YET COMPLETED, AS FOLLOWS: February 26, 1980 Mr. Jack G. Jennings County Administrator Indian River County Room 115 County Courthouse Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Re: Final Plat Old Sugar Mill Estates #2 Dear Mr. Jennings: I am enclosing seven copies of the final plat for'the subject job. I would appreciate your placing this on the March 5, 1980, agenda for final approval. I am also listing below the amount of monies to cover three items of work not yet completed. This will serve as my estimate for bond purposes. 1. Road Signs 4 Ea. @ $100.00 $ 400.00 2.- Grass for Shoulders 6600 S.Y. @ 25G 1,650.00 3. Road in Front of Lot 7 330 S.Y. @ $5.50 1,815.00 $3,865.00 I will have a check in the amount of $3,865.00 at the March 5, 1980, meeting. Very truly yours, BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ames L. Beindorf JLB:mk Approval recommended: n MR. BEINDORF EXPLAINED THAT THEY HAVE -NOT PAVED ALL THE ROAD IN FRONT OF LOT 7, BUT WHEN THEY EXTEND THE ROAD, THEY WILL CONTINUE TO PAVE IN FRONT OF LOT 7, AND HE WANTED TO POST BOND TO 38 MAR 51980 a .429%%846 .42. ;AGF'847 COVER THIS. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE CONFORMED WITH EVERYTHING THEY AGREED TO D0; IN ADDITION, THE GRASSING I$ NOW DONE, BUT RATHER THAN CHANGE THE LETTER AND THE CHECK, THEY WILL PUT UP A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,865. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THE BOARD HAD AGREED TO GRANT APPROVAL WITH THREE CONDITIONS: (1) RECEIPT OF THE CHECK, (2) A REFERENCE IN THE MINUTES THAT THE CUL DE SAC WAS NOT PERMANENT, AND (3) RECEIPT OF AN EASEMENT DEED FOR 10'. MR. BEINDORF STATED THAT HE DID RECORD THE DEED AND EXPLAINED THAT THEY PUT A DITCH ON THE PROPERTY LINE SO IF THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST DEVELOPS, THERE WILL NOT BE A DUAL DITCH. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF OLD SUGAR (MILL ESTATES UNIT #2.BASED ON THE TWO CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE SET OUT ABOVE AND THE RECORDING_OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THAT THE MINUTES REFER TO THE ENGINEER S STATEMENT THAT THE CUL DE SAC ON 13TH PLACE IS A TEMPORARY CUL DE SAC, AND ADMINISTRATOR ,JENNINGS ASKED THAT THE MINUTES SET OUT THAT MR. BEINDORF INTENDS TO HAVE THIS FULLY COMPLETED WITHIN 60 DAYS. THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: 39 MARII&980 VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: ° STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a in the matter of in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of Dom, Z"O Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed�efore�ne this r day of(�L_ A.I�/�C/ vv v (SEAL) iness Manager) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, IMian River County, Florida) NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY- GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has tentatively ap- proved the following changes and additions to 'the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, which changes and .additions are substantially as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property situated at the southeast corner of the intersection of S.R. 60 and 82nd Avenue in Indian River County, Florida, to wit: The North 660.1t, of the West 10.82 acres of Tract 12, Section 1, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, exclusive of rights-of-way, Indian River Farms Co. Subd., Plat Book 2, Page 25, OR Book 99, Page 21. Be changed from R-3 Multiple Dwelling District to GAA Restricted Commercial District. A public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by said Planning, and Zoning Commission in the. County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Thursday, January 24, 1980, at 7:30 P.M., after which said public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard will be held by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Com- mission Room, Indian River County Cour- thouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, March.$, 1980, at 2:00 P.M. Board of Cruaty commissioners. Indian River -County By:. William C. Wodtke Jr., Chairman Indian River County Planning and.Zoning Commission By: Dick Bird, Chairman Jan. 6,9,1980.' NOTICES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WERE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY OWNERS BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66, COPIES OF SAID NOTICES BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK: HARRY W. & MURIEL D. CLAYTON GLEN & EFFIE MILLIMAN WILLIAM GORE & LEILA PEEBLES GORE CHARLES E. STANFORD ENTERPRISES, INC. STRAZZULA BROS. CO., INC. JACK & BESSIE MARCOSKI MAR 51980 " r MAR 51980 som 42 FAGS 849? PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 4.5 ACRES ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RANCH ROAD (82ND AVE.) AND S.R. 60. THE APPLICANT INTENDS TO CONSTRUCT A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS. IT IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED, AND THERE IS A GROVE AND MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE NORTH AND A TRUCK STOP TO THE WEST. MR. REVER CONTINUED THAT AN ANALYSIS WAS DONE BY STAFF, AND IT IS.THEIR RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS REZONING SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED BASED ON THE FACT THAT THERE ALREADY IS APPROXIMATELY 170 ACRES OF EXISTING B-1, WHICH WILL ALLOW ALMOST EVERYTHING TO HAPPEN THE SAME AS IN C-1 OR C-lA,WITH THE EXCLUSION OF A GAS SERVICE STATION. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACILITIES WITHIN A MILE AND A HALF TO THE WEST, AND HE FELT THE EXISTING B-1 WAS AMPLE TO SUPPLY THE PRESENT AND FUTURE NEEDS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER COMMENTED THAT THE PLANNING & ZONING, BOARD, RATHER THAN CHANGE THE WHOLE PARCEL TO C -1A, PREFERRED TO COMPROMISE AND HAVE -A SMALLER PARCEL OF APPROXIMATELY 3/4 OF AN ACRE FOR THE GAS PUMPS AND THE REMAINDER PUT INTO B-1. HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS THE STAFF'S CONTENTION THAT THIS DOES NOT ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM ANY, AND THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL NEED FOR EITHER IN THE VICINITY. THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD VOTED 3-2 IN FAVOR OF REZONING TO C-lA AND B-1, BUT THE PLANNING STAFF DOES NOT RECOMMEND THIS. ATTORNEY COLLINS INQUIRED AS TO THE RATIONALE FOR REZONING THE ENTIRE PARCEL WHEN THEY JUST INTEND TO BUILD A CONVENIENCE STORE, AND THE PLANNING DIRECTOR DID NOT KNOW THAT THERE WAS ANY PARTICULAR RATIONALE. ATTORNEY GORDON JOHNSTON APPEARED REPRESENTING MR. ,AND MRS. CLAYTON, THE APPLICANTS. HE FELT THE VOTE OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WAS 4 TO 1 IN FAVOR OF THE REZONING, BUT PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER STATED THAT IT WAS NOT. ATTORNEY JOHNSTON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WHEN THIS REQUEST ORIGINALLY WAS SUBMITTED, THEY HAD A CONTRACT CONTINGENT ON REZONING TO ALLOW A SERVICE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS, SIMILAR TO THE 7-11 STORES AROUND THE COUNTY. HE EXPLAINED THAT MR. CLAYTON ASKED HIM WHAT HE THOUGHT ABOUT HAVING ADDITIONAL PROPERTY REZONED, AND HE HAD ADVISED MR. CLAYTON THAT HE FELT IT WOULD BE EASIER TO DO IT ALL AT ONCE. HE NOTED THAT MR. CLAYTON ALSO OWNS FIVE ACRES IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH, FOR WHICH HE IS NOT REQUESTING REZONING. ATTORNEY JOHNSTON NOTED THAT ACTUALLY THERE IS ONLY ONE PIECE SPECIFICALLY ZONED COMMERCIAL (C-1) IN THIS AREA, THE REST IS B-1. HE'POINTED OUT THAT NOT TOO LONG AGO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANTED A REZONING REQUEST THAT WILL ALLOW A LARGE INFLUX OF PEOPLE AT VILLAGE GREEN, WHICH WILL REQUIRE SOME SERVICE AREAS,AND HE FELT A MAJOR INTERSECTION IS WHERE THIS TYPE OF ZONING SHOULD TAKE PLACE SO THERE WOULD BE A GOOD TRAFFIC FLOW. ATTORNEY JOHNSTON NOTED THAT ALL OF THIS B-1 PROPERTY IS BEING STUDIED BY THE PLANNING STAFF, AND HE BELIEVED THEY HAVE STATED THAT IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE MASTER PLAN, SOME OF THESE B-1 AREAS WOULD BE CUT DOWN IN SIZE OR ELIMINATED. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT AT THE PREVIOUS PUBLIC HEARING THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE REZONING FROM THE AUDIENCE AND THE ONLY COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE VICINITY WERE FAVORABLE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THEY SELL GASOLINE AT THE TRUCK STOP, AND ATTORNEY .JOHNSTON BELIEVED THAT THEY DO, BUT NOTED THAT THE SALE OF GASOLINE AT CONVENIENCE STORES IS USED AS A "LOSS LEADER" TYPE OF THING. COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT ROUTE 60 HAS A 75' SET- BACK IN THAT AREA AND ASKED IF THAT WOULD GIVE THEM ENOUGH ROOM. ATTORNEY JOHNSTON STATED THAT IT WOULD. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THE 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS INCLUDED IN THE 75' SETBACK, AND ATTORNEY JOHNSTON FELT THE ORDINANCE 3 STATES THAT THE SETBACK IS FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROUTE 60. ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THE LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT CALLS FOR REZONING THE ENTIRE PARCEL TO C -IA WHILE THE RECOMMENDATION 42 MAR 51900 tom -- . *t " - Y MAR 51900 42 *E851,. OF THE ZONING BOARD WAS TO APPROVE C-lA FOR A SMALL SECTION IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL AND CHANGE THE REMAINDER TO B-1. HE ASKED IF WE CAN CONSIDER CHANGING DIFFERENT PORTIONS AS LONG AS WE DOWNGRADE THE ZONING. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HE PERSONALLY WOULD PREFER TO SEE IT READVERTISED, BUT FELT IT IS A LESSER USE AND WITH A STIPULATION FROM THE APPLICANT, HE BELIEVED THE BOARD COULD MOVE AHEAD. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 80-9 AUTHORIZING A CHANGE IN ZONING TO C -IA FOR THE 150 X 250 PIECE IN THE NORTHWEST SECTION OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL; THE REMAINDER TO STAY IN R-3. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, TO DENY THE REZONING REQUEST ON THE BASIS THAT THERE ALREADY IS SUFFICIENT B-1 ZONING IN THE AREA AND BECAUSE IT WOULD BE, IN EFFECT, SPOT ZONING. COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT HERE WE HAVE A SINGLE PROPERTY OWNER WHO HAS TEN ACRES, AND ALTHOUGH THIS INTERSECTION DOES NOT YET BEAR THE SAME TRAFFIC AS 510 AND 512, HE FELT THERE IS A NEED AND THAT YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE THE COMMERCIAL ZONING ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD AND DENY IT ON THE OTHER SIDE. HE BELIEVED BY ZONING THIS IN A WAY THAT CREATES A BUFFER, WE CAN PROPERLY CONTROL THAT AREA. COMMISSIONER WODTKE DID NOT SEE ANY PARTICULAR NEED FOR THE APPLICANT TO GO TO THE B-1, AND FELT IF THERE IS SUCH A NEED IN THE FUTURE, IT COULD BE ADDRESSED AT THAT TIME. HE FURTHER FELT THAT WITH TODAY IS ECONOMY, THERE IS A NEED FOR CONVENIENCE STORES SINCE THEIR SELF-SERVICE GAS PUMPS ARE ABOUT THE LEAST EXPENSIVE BECAUSE THEY CAN TAKE THE PROFITS IN THE STORE AND NOT SO MUCH ON THE GAS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT WAS OF THE OPINION THAT GAS IS MORE EXPENSIVE IN CONVENIENCE STORES AND STATED THAT HE FELT DIFFERENTLY FROM -EVERYONE BECAUSE WHILE HE AGREED THERE MAY BE A NEED FOR A CONVENIENCE STORE, HE DID NOT FEEL A GAS STATION WAS NEEDED, AND HE DID NOT FEEL YOU WOULD WANT B-1 ON THAT INTERSECTION. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE INTENT OF COMMISSIONER LYONS' POTION, AND HE STATED THAT IT WAS MEANT TO DENY THE REZONING RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD OR TO DENY ANY CHANGE IN ZONING. COMMISSIONER LOY FELT THE ZONING BOARD HAD DONE A GOOD JOB AND STATED THAT SHE LIKED THE B-1 ON THE ROAD A LOT BETTER THAN THE R-3. ATTORNEY .JOHNSTON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS CLIENT HAD ACQUIESCED WITH -THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE C -1A AND THE B-1 AND FURTHER NOTED THAT THE PLANNING BOARD'S ATTORNEY STATED THEY COULD CHANGE THE REQUEST BECAUSE IT WAS A HIGHER ZONING AND DID NOT DOWNGRADE FROM THE NOTICE. THE -CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON WITH COMMISSIONERS LYONS AND DEESON VOTING IN FAVOR; COMMISSIONERS Loy, WODTKE, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN OPPOSITION. THE MOTION FAILED. POTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 80-9 GRANTING A REZONING TO C-lA FOR THE 150' X 250' AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE PROPERTY ADVERTISED, THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY TO BE GIVEN A B-1 CLASSIFICATION. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THAT WE ARE GETTING BACK INTO THE BUSINESS OF LITTLE DRIBS AND DRABS OF REZONING AND THAT WE SHOULD LOOK AT THE WHOLE AREA IN ORDER TO HAVE A TOTALLY ARTICULATED PICTURE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE LOOKS AT IT A LITTLE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE WE WILL HAVE MANY RESIDENTIAL PEOPLE IN AN AREA THAT IS SEVEN TO EIGHT MILES FROM TOWN. HE BELIEVED THESE PEOPLE ARE ENTITLED TO HAVE FACILITIES AVAILABLE AND THAT WE HAVE TO ADDRESS THIS PROBLEM AS THE AREA DEVELOPS AND THE NEEDS ARISE. COMMISSIONER LYONS POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS ALL KINDS OF B-1 NEARBY, AND THAT THERE ALREADY IS A GAS PUMP ACROSS THE STREET AND A SMALL CAFE. HE STATED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH DEVELOPING THAT CORNER, BUT FELT IT SHOULD BE PART OF AN INTEGRATED APPROACH. 44 MAR 51980 .4z, t; kA MAR 51980 mox 42 'ACE853 COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT POSSIBLY THE EXISTING B-1 HAS NOT DEVELOPED BECAUSE IT ISN IT IN THE RIGHT LOCATION. HE FELT THE ACCESSIBILITY IS THE PROBLEM. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR A CONVENI- ENCE STORE TO SUPPORT THE FACILITIES OF THE NEW PROJECT, BUT REITERATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THERE IS A NEED FOR A GAS STATION SINCE THERE IS GAS AVAILABLE RIGHT ACROSS THE HIGHWAY; HE CONTINUED THAT HE, THERE- FORE, WOULD LIKE TO SEE B-1 AND NO C-lA, 5 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONERS LAY, WODTKE AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN FAVOR; COMMISSIONERS DEESON AND LYONS VOTED IN OPPOSITION, AND THE MOTION TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 80-9 GRANTING A REZONING TO C-lA AND B-1 CARRIED. MARI"980 45 _ ORDINANCE NO. 80-9 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send. its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto held a public hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: The West 150' of the North 250' of the West 10.82 acres of Tract 12, Section 1, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, exclusive of rights-of-way, Indian River Farms Co. Subd., Plat Book 2, Page 25, OR Book 99, Page 21 Be changed from R-3 Multiple Family District to C-lA Commercial District, and The North 660' of the West 10.82 acres of Tract 121 Section 1, Township 33 South, Ranae 38 East, exclusive of rights-of-way, Indian River Farms Co. Subd., Plat Book 2, Page 25, OR Book 99, Page 21, less the West 150' of the North 250' of said described property Be changed from R-3 Multiple Family District to B-1 Planned Business District. All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Zoning Regulations. This Ordinance shall take effect March 10, 1980. 3 M 2 , 4 AR 51980 MAR 51980 max 42 FrUF 855. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT BUILDING DIRECTOR ESTER RYMER WOULD NOW REVIEW THE FOLLOWING LIST OF PENDING CONDEMNATIONS ON HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES: 47 MA1980 � � - DEPARTMENT ORRESPOE E = DATE _ January 7. 1980 To Mr. Joe Collins _ DEPOT County _Attorney FROM Ester L. Rymer DEPT Building Director SUBJECT Condemnations for Indian River County Following is a listing of the pending condemnations to date, for which I would appreciate your assistance and legal handling, for presentation to the County Board of Commissioners. 1) Viola Young; (deceased): We are told this is being handled by ttny. Erickson. 2) Everett J. Gill <deceased): Copy sent to Dale Grabenbauer,- 542 Fleming St., Sebastian, Fla.(Permit taken out -not removed) 3) Delwyn D. Danko: 3792 S.W. 16th Place, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. 4) Noble Lee Jackson (et al): Trustees of the Church of God in Christ Temple, 4875 - 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, Fla.(Permit taken -not removed) 5) Dr. Charles A. Fenner: P.O. Box 323, Wabasso, Fla. 32970 6) Fannie Ruth Wade Stinson: 1100 Mill Street, Melbourne, Fla. 32901 7) Angelo P. Garetto: 23706 S. Western, Blue Island, 111. 60406 8) Lucille West: 4311 - 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, Fla. 9) Helen McConico Jackson: c/o Anne Lou Ferguson, P.O. Box 1841, Vero 10) S & R Land Com an : Route #2, 920 North A -I -A, Vero Beach (No notice necessary. I have an affidavit from the owner authorizing Indian River County to remove this structure and bill them for expenses.) 11) Homeowner's Corp.: P.O. Box 27, Rockledge, Fla. 32955 12) Charles Brown: 4625 - 40 Ave., Vero Beach (Letter came back unclaimed) 13) E. Griffith & Catherine Hall: 6155 - 7th Place, Vero Beach. 14) C. A. Lightsey: Route 1, Box 211, -Monticello, Fla. 32344 15) Altheris Sharpton: P.O. Box 12, Wabasso (Notice ret'd. unclaimed) 16) Laila W. Jackson & Gertrude W. Schockliford: P.O. Box 113, Wabasso Sent in both names-ret'd. markeU Jac son eceased; resent in just Schockliford-notice ret'd. as unclaimed.) 17) Sam. & Lottie Williams: Route 1, Box 763, Cocoa, Fla. 32922 18) James White: Box 553, Wabasso, Fla. 19) Carol Smith: 4439 - 35th Ave (Lot 4, Blk 2, N. Gifford Heights) Demo .IlPerm t taken -still not removed. 20) Rev. Willie Jones: 2110 - 41st St. (Corner S. Gifford Rd & U.S. #1) st Demol. Permit taken 4-17-77; reissued again on 11-17-78; still not removed. 21) Earlie B. Evans: 2380 - 41st St (Lot 7, Jackson's SID) Demol Permit taken 7-10-/9; not removed. 22) Robt. W. & Pearlie W. Erickson: 1349 Berea Place, Pacific Palisades, a i noria90272 23) Zettie Ealy: Box 461, Wabasso, Fla. The following structures have been removed but the debris is still existing: F 1) W. E. Orth (el al): P.O. Box 772, Vero Beach 2) Edward Strnad: Connecticut Trailer Park structure 3) Ms. Minnie Ross: P.O. Box 386, Wabasso, Fla. 4. MAR 51980° 42 856 J MAR 51990 42 f 857 BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ON ITEM 1, VIOLA YOUNG, BOTH THE PROPERTY OWNER AND HER ATTORNEY ARE DECEASED. ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SEND NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER WHO APPEARS ON THE TAX ROLL, AND THIS HAS BEEN DONE, THOUGH HIS NOTICE WAS NOT ACKNOWLEDGED. MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE HAS A RETURN RECEIPT SIGNED BY THE GRANDDAUGHTER. MRS. RYMER THEN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS IS A DILAPIDATED STRUCTURE WHICH NEEDS TO BE TAKEN DOWN. THE HOUSE IS NOT OCCUPIED AND HAS NO ELECTRICITY. SHE SUBMITTED A PICTURE OF THE STRUCTURE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATOR TO HAVE COUNTY CREWS REMOVE SAID STRUCTURE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATOR BID THE JOB OUT AND THEN FILE A LIEN, BUT HISTORICALLY, WE HAVE FOUND THAT THE COUNTY CAN DO THIS WORK CHEAPER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY VIOLA YOUNG, DECEASED, (26-32-29- 00005-0060-00003.0) LOT 3, BLOCK 6, SPRUCE PARK SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NEXT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ITEM 2, OWNED BY EVERETT J. GILL, DECEASED, HAS BEEN PURCHASED BY DALE GRABENAUER, AND MR. GRABENAUER DID COME IN AND OBTAIN A DEMOLITION PERMIT IN NOVEMBER OF 1979. THE DEMOLITION HAS NOT TAKEN PLACE, HOWEVER, AND SHE HAS NO INDICATION WHEN IT WILL BE. DALE GRABENAUER APPEARED AND EXPLAINED THAT HE PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY FROM MR. GILL IN A LIFE ESTATE. MR. GILL HAS SINCE DIED, BUT THE PROPERTY IS STILL RECORDED IN MR. GILLS NAME. MR. GRABENAUER STATED THAT HE HAS AN ATTORNEY WORKING ON THIS, AND HE DID NOT WANT TO GO AHEAD UNTIL THE PROPERTY WAS IN HIS NAME. MAR X900 49 = � ATTORNEY COLLINS QUESTIONED WHAT MR. GRABENAUER MEANT BY A It LIFE ESTATE,°° AND MR. GRABENAUER EXPLAINED THAT HIS CONTRACT WITH MR. GILL GAVE HIM THE RIGHT TO LIVE ON THE PROPERTY FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT IF MR. GRABENAUER HAS A WARRANTY DEED, AND IT -WAS SIGNED PRIOR TO MR. GILL°S DEATH, THEN TITLE IS IN MR. GRABENAUER°S NAME. MR. GRABENAUER STATED THAT HE DOES HAVE A WARRANTY DEED. HE NOTED THAT WHEN HE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY FOUR YEARS AGO, YOU COULDN'T GET ON THE PROPERTY WITH A TANK, AND HE HAS BEEN WORKING ON IT, HAULING LOADS OF JUNK TO THE DUMP, AND WAS NOT AWARE OF ANY SPECIFIC DATE WHEN HE WAS SUPPOSED TO TEAR IT DOWN. COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF 90 DAYS WOULD BE A REASONABLE PERIOD TO ASK THAT`THIS WILL BE TORN DOWN. MR. GRABENAUER FELT THAT WOULD BE FAIR. HE ASKED IF THE CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT WOULD BURN THIS DOWN, AND COMMISSIONER LOY FELT HE WOULD BE BETTER OFF IF IT WERE REMOVED BY THE COUNTY. MR. GRABENAUER STATED THAT HE DID NOT KNOW WHAT THE COUNTY WOULD CHARGE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE CHARGE IS THE DIRECT COST OF THE COUNTY TO TEAR IT DOWN; THERE IS NO PROFIT FACTOR. HE DID NOT BELIEVE ANYONE COULD CONTRACT TO DO IT FOR LESS. MR. GRABENAUER CONTINUED THAT THIS PLACE HAS LOOKED LIKE A DUMP FOR YEARS, AND NOW THAT HE HAS COME IN AND MORE OR LESS BEAUTI- FIED IT, SUDDENLY THE PRESSURE IS BEING PUT ON HIM TO REMOVE IT. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE BOARD IS MAKING A CONCERTED EFFORT TO GET THESE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES REMOVED. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY DALE GRABENAUER, PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY EVERETT J. GILL, DECEASED, LOCATED AT 1095 27TH AVENUE (INDIAN RIVER FARMS CO. SUB. PBS 2-25 S 1 ACRE OF S 5 ACRES OF E 10 ACRES OF TRACT 1, OR BK. 486, PP 765) ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN 0 50 42 MAR 51980 '"` MAR 51900 eo% 42 fso859 RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS FROM TODAY BY DALE GRABENAUER, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL THEREAFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR UNLESS OWNER CONSENTS TO A LESSER PERIOD, AND A LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. ON ITEM 3, PROPERTY OWNED BY DELWYN DANKO, LOCATED AT 1700 IST ST. S.W., BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED THAT SHE NEVER HAS HAD ANY CONTACT WITH THE OWNERS DIRECTLY, BUT HAS RECEIVED A LOT OF COMPLAINTS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SEVERAL NOTICES HAVE BEEN SENT AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE DID GET A RETURN RECEIPT WHEN THE NOTICE WAS SENT IN CARE OF RICHARD WELCH, 4164 S.W. 22ND ST., FORT LAUDERDALE. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID NOT GET A RETURN ON HIS NOTICE, BUT THAT THE BOARD COULD PROCEED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS:LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY DELWYN D. DANKO, LOCATED AT 1700 1ST ST. S.W., LOT 4, BLOCK F, THE MORELAND SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER PRESENTED PICTURES OF ITEM 4 AND STATED THAT NOBLE -LEE JACKSON ET AL, HAD BEEN SENT NOTICES AS TRUSTEES FOR THE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST TEMPLE. MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE DID RECEIVE A RETURN RECEIPT; ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID NOT, BUT THE BURDEN IS TO SEND THE NOTICE TO THE ADDRESS ON THE TAX ROLL. PARS. RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SHE DID.ISSUE A DEMOLI- TION PERMIT IN 1978, BUT THEY HAVE NEVER GONE AHEAD WITH IT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE_PROPERTY OWNED BY NOBLE LEE JACKSON, ET AL, TRUSTEES OF THE 51 MA=1980 CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST TEMPLE, LOCATED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 16, HILLCREST SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT REPORTED ON THE PROPERTY IN ITEM 5 OWNED BY DR. CHARLES A. FENNER, BEING THE HIGHLANDS MOTEL AND POOL ON NORTH U.S. 1. HE STATED THAT NOTICES HAVE BEEN SENT, AND THEY HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE COUNTY PREVIOUSLY WAS INVOLVED IN SOME LITIGATION WITH DR, FENNER IN 1975, AT WHICH TIME HE WAS TRYING TO ADD IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY 'WITHOUT A BUILDING PERMIT. HE STATED THAT WE ENJOINED HIM FROM CONTINUING WITHOUT A PERMIT AND HAD THE STRUCTURE DECLARED HAZARDOUS AND GAVE HIM 90 DAYS TO EITHER FIX IT UP OR TEAR IT DOWN, AND THE COURT DID ENTER AN ORDER REQUIRING THAT IT BE TORN DOWN. THE ATTORNEY CONTINUED THAT WE HAVE TWO AVENUES OF APPROACH - HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES AND CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR FAILURE TO TEAR THE BUILDING DOWN AS REQUIRED. DR. FENNER CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT HE HADN'T RECEIVED ANY CORRESPONDENCE WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROBLEM, AND THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS ABOUT THE 5TH OF FEBRUARY OF CLEANING UP THE HURRICANE DAMAGE WHEN A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BROUGHT TO HIS CONTRACTOR S ATTENTION THAT THERE WAS SOME CORRESPONDENCE HE HAD NOT RECEIVED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED DR. FENNER IF HE WAS AWARE OF THE COURT ORDER, AND DR. FENNER STATED HE DID NOT KNOW OF THIS. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT DR. FENNER WAS PRESENT AT THE COURT AND DID RECEIVE A NOTICE, AND DR. FENNER STATED THAT IF HE WAS REFERRING TO 1975, HE WAS AWARE OF THAT. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF HE REMEMBERED BEING GIVEN 90 DAYS BY THE COURT TO REMOVE THE STRUCTURE. 52 MAR 51980acF MAR 51980 Booz 42 f$61 DR. FENNER,CONTENDED THAT THE COURT ORDER SPECIFIED THAT THE BUILDINGS WERE SOUND AND THAT THE ONLY STRUCTURES REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED WERE 5 FREE STANDING MASONRY WALLS. ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT AGREE AND READ FROM THE COURT ORDER WHICH ENJOINED DR. FENNER FROM ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A BUILDING PERMIT WAS OBTAINED AND REQUIRED THAT WITHIN 60 DAYS HE "TAKE WHATEVER ACTION IS NECESSARY TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE BUILDING DIRECTOR THAT.THE CONSTRUCTION ON HIS PROPERTY MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTHERN STANDARD BUILDING CODE...." HE STATED THAT THE ONLY ISSUE THE COURT ADDRESSED WAS BUILDING WITHOUT A PERMIT. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE FELT THE BOARD HAS BEEN EXTREMELY LENIENT WITH DR. FENNER ALL THESE YEARS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED DR. FENNER IF HE FELT THE BUILDING IS HAZARDOUS, AND DR. FENNER STATED THAT HE DID NOT AND THAT HE HAS CONSULTED PROFESSIONALS WHO CONCUR WITH HIM. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, TO DETERMINE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY DR. CHARLES A. FENNER (17-31-39-00000-3000-00014.0) THE HIGHLAND MOTEL (STRUCTURE & POOL), ARE DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND TO MOVE THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM TODAY (MARCH 15, 1980), BY DR. CHARLES A. FENNER, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES SHALL THEREAFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND A LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT DR. FENNER IS REPRESENTING TO THE BOARD THAT THE STRUCTURE IS IN COMPLIANCE AND THAT HE HAS PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE WHO WILL STATE IT IS IN COMPLIANCE AND HE PROBABLY SHOULD BE GIVEN A CHANCE TO PRESENT THAT EVIDENCE TO THE COMMISSION PRIOR TO ANY FINAL ACTION. COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED WHAT THE BUILDING DIRECTOR HAS TO SAY ABOUT THE STRUCTURES. 53 Mft51980 BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE NOTICES SENT TO DR. FENNER CAME BACK UNCLAIMED. SHE CONTINUED THAT DR. FENNER AND AN ARCHITECT VISITED HER LAST WEEK, AND THE ARCHITECT FIRST CALLED HER AND SAID HIS FIRST RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE FOR DR. FENNER TO REMOVE THE BUILDINGS AND START FROM SCRATCH; THEY THEN CAME IN AND TALKED ABOUT•USING THESE BUILDINGS AS OFFICES INSTEAD OF A MOTEL. MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE ADVISED THEM TO CONTACT A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE WHAT THEY CAN SALVAGE, AND SHE ASKED FOR DEFINITE INFORMATION THAT A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN DONE. MRS. RYMER FELT IF PROFESSIONAL MEN HAVE DONE THIS, THEY WOULD HAVE PUT IT IN WRITING. SHE REITERATED THAT SHE TOLD DR. FENNER AND HIS ARCHITECT EXACTLY WHAT HAD TO BE DONE, AND SHE HAS NOT SEEN OR HEARD FROM THEM SINCE. MRS. RYMER REPORTED THAT SHE DID SEND AN INSPECTOR UP TO THE MOTEL TO PUT A STOP WORK ORDER ON THE JOB BECAUSE THEY WERE REROOFING SOME OF THE BUILDINGS, AND YOU CANNOT DO THIS ON CONDEMNED BUILDINGS WITHOUT THE ELECTRICAL, ETC., BEING APPROVED FIRST. SHE CONTINUED THAT THEY COMMENCED REROOFING AGAIN, AND SHE HAD TO STOP THEM AGAIN. MRS. RYMER STATED THAT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IS MAINTAINING THAT NOT ONLY THE STRUCTURAL PART OF THE BUILDING.IS NOT ACCORDING TO CODE, BUT THAT THE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL HAVE -TO BE BROUGHT UP TO CODE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INQUIRED IF DR. FENNER DOES NEED A PERMIT FOR ROOFING, AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT HE DOES AND ONE WAS NOT CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CALLED DR. FENNER BACK AND NOTED THAT HE HAS NOT BEEN COOPERATIVE UP TO THIS DATE, AND DR. FENNER INQUIRED WHAT THE BOARD WISHED HIM TO DO. COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT HE COULD PICK UP HIS MAIL FOR A START. DR. FENNER STATED THAT IF THE BOARD AND THE BUILDING DEPART- MENT FEELS HIS BUILDINGS ARE SUB -STANDARD, HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THIS QUALIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL STRESS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SO THAT HE CAN EITHER REFUTE OR NOT REFUTE THIS CLAIM. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS BEEN TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WITH A BREAKDOWN ON THE 54 MAR 51980 � 42'86 MAR 51990 42 -f-0-4863 INDIVIDUAL REPAIRS AND OUTLINED THESE VERY CAREFULLY AFTER TALKING TO HIS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND TWO CONTRACTORS. HE STATED THAT HIS BUILDING PERMITS WERE DENIED AND HIS ROOFER TOLD HIM THAT PERMITS WERE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE REPAIR OF HURRICANE DAMAGE, AND THAT IS ALL THEY ARE CURRENTLY DOING. HE ONCE AGAIN STATED THAT HE COMPLIED WITH THE 1975 COURT ORDER 100% AND REMOVED THE FREE STANDING CONCRETE WALLS, WHICH WAS ALL THAT WAS REQUIRED. COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED HIM HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN SINCE SOMEONE HAS LIVED IN THE MOTEL OR HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN SINCE ANYONE RENTED FROM HIM. DR. FENNER STATED THAT HE LIVES THERE RIGHT NOW, BUT THE - PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN LEASED SINCE LAST SEPTEMBER. HE CONTINUED THAT HE FELT THEY WERE STOPPED FROM REMOVING WHAT HE CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS DAMAGE TO THE BUILDINGS. HE NOTED THE SECOND STORY WAS COMPLETELY DESTROYED AND THEY REMOVED IT; PORCHES THAT WERE DESTROYED WERE REMOVED, AND REPAIRS TO THE ROOFS OF BUILDINGS 1 AND Z WERE STARTED WITHOUT A PERMIT BECAUSE HE WAS TOLD THIS WAS NOT REQUIRED TO REPAIR HURRICANE DAMAGE. HE CONTINUED THAT WHEN HE HEARD ABOUT THE PERMIT HE CALLED HIS LAWYER, WHO WENT TO SEE ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER, AT WHICH TIME THEY WERE INFORMED THE PROPERTY WAS CONDEMNED AND WERE GIVEN COPIES OF CORRESPONDENCE THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE RECEIVED. DR. FENNER CLAIMED THAT THE LETTER IN REGARD TO CONDEMNATION WAS WRITTEN TO THE ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT, NOT TO HIS NAME, AND THE ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT PASSED ON THE INFORMATION THAT THE PROPERTY WAS CONDEMNED. HE STATED THAT THIS IS THE FIRST TIME HE HAS BEEN ASKED ANYTHING ABOUT THE PROPERTY. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE POOL IS NOT BEING USED; RAIN COLLECTS IN IT AND CREATES AN UNSANITARY CONDITION, AND ONCE THE STRUCTURES ARE REMOVED, IT WOULD BE JUST AN OPEN POOL ON AN EMPTY LOT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HIS MOTION IS INTENDED TO INCLUDE ALL ITEMS VERIFIED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AS HAZARDOUS. 55 MPS 1980 THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED TO DR. FENNER ABOUT THE PROCESS FOR REMOVAL OF THE STRUCTURES AND PLACING OF A LIEN. THE ADMINISTRATOR ASKED IF IT IS THE INTENT, IF THE POOL IS REMOVED, THAT IT SHOULD BE FILLED IN, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT YOU CANNOT LEAVE A HOLE THERE, THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED HE WILL NOTIFY DR: FENNER, WHO HAS NO TELEPHONE, BEFORE THE COUNTY COMMENCES REMOVAL OF THE STRUCTURES. DR. FENNER ASKED IF THERE IS ANY APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, AND THE BOARD INFORMED HIM THAT HE CAN APPEAL TO THE COURTS. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED THAT NO ONE WAS PRESENT TO REPRESENT FANNIE RUTH WADE STINSON, ITEM 61 AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT NOTIFICATION HAS BEEN SENT AND RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY FANNIE RUTH WADE STINSON (29-31-39- 00000-5000-0008,0) LOT 8 - 209 FT. X 209 FT. IN NW COR. OF N 1/2 OF NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 of SCJ 1/4 LESS BROCK & 560 FT. OF N 120 FT. OF W 125 FT. LESS l; 25 FT. FOR RD. R/W, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT ANGELO GARETTO, ITEM 7, HAS CALLED SEVERAL TIMES FROM ILLINOIS. HE APPARENTLY HAD SOME AGREEMENT ABOUT WITHHOLDING MONTHLY RENTAL TO BRING THE HOUSE UP TO CODE, AND HE WILL BE DOWN BY MARCH 11TH, BUT HAD A DEATH IN THE FAMILY AND COULD NOT BE PRESENT TODAY. SHE REQUESTED THAT THIS ITEM BE DELAYED TO GIVE HER TIME TO WORK WITH THE OWNER. COMMISSIONER LYONS REQUESTED THAT MRS. RYMER REPORT BACK ON THIS MATTER IN A MONTH S TIME. 56 MAR 5190 , � xoq Mai 5 1980 K '42 `nof865 ON ITEM S, LUCILLE WEST, BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED THAT NOTICE WAS SENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED. ATTORNEY COLLINS SENT NOTICE BUT RECEIVED NO ANSWER. MRS. RYMER NOTED THAT THERE HAD BEEN AN ARTICLE IN THE NEWSPAPER SOMETIME AGO REPORTING THAT THE HOME OF LUCILLE WEST HAD BEEN DESTROYED BY A FLASH FIRE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF SHE WOULD LIKE TO ALLOW THEM MORE TIME ON ACCOUNT OF THE FIRE, AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE HAS NOT HEARD FROM THEM SINCE THE FIRE WHICH WAS LAST SEPTEMBER. ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT FEEL THE FIRE HAD MUCH AFFECT ON THIS SINCE THE PROPERTY WAS -CONDEMNED PRIOR TO THE FIRE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY LUCILLE WEST (27-32-39-0004-0040-0011.0) LOT 11, BLOCK 4, NORTH GIFFORD HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER.COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY HELEN MCCONICO .JACKSON, ITEM 9, HAS BEEN PROPERLY REMOVED SINCE NOTICE. MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE HAS RECEIVED AN AFFIDAVIT FROM S & R LAND COMPANY, ITEM 10, AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY TO REMOVE THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THEIR PROPERTY AND BILL THEM FOR THE EXPENSE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY S & R LAND COMPANY, (12-33-39-0000-5000- 0012.0) 1030 OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED 57 MM51980 `- _.- A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE*EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT NOTICE WAS SENT TO HOMEOWNER'S CORPORATION, ITEM 11, AND RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGED. SHE CONTINUED THAT SHE HAD A REPORT FROM THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE IS OPEN ON ONE SIDE AND SUBJECT TO VANDALISM. SHE STATED THAT SHE GAVE THE OWNER THE RIGHT TO EITHER FIX IT UP OR TEAR IT DOWN, BUT HAS HAD NO RESPONSE. SHE CONTINUED THAT THE HURRICANE TOOK THE ROOF OFF, AND IT IS NOW OUT IN THE YARD. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY HOMEOWNER'S CORPORATION (17-32-39-02-0030- 00039,0) .JOHN D. STONOM RESIDENCE, LOTS 29--32, BLOCK 3, KINGS MUSIC LAND SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRE- SENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER, MRS. RYMER STATED THAT NOTICES SENT TO CHARLES BROWN, ITEM 12, WERE RETURNED UNCLAIMED. SHE SUBMITTED PICTURES. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE TAXES WERE PAID BY THE ADAIR MORTGAGE CO., OF MACON, GEORGIA, WHICH INDICATES THEY HAVE EITHER FORECLOSED ON THE PROPERTY OR SOMEONE IS MAKING MORTGAGE PAY- MENTS. HE STATED THAT THE FILE REFLECTS THAT THREE DIFFERENT NOTICES HAVE BEEN SENT ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY CHARLES BROWN (22-31-39-00-5000-025.0) 4625 40TH AVENUE, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE 58 MAR 51980 4 L max 42 pAu 867 REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT NOTICES WERE SENT TO E. GRIFFITH AND CATHERINE C. HALL, ITEM 13. BUT NOT ACKNOWLEDGED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY E. GRIFFITH & CATHERINE C. HALL (17-33-39- 00005-0004-00006.0) LOTS 6 & 7, BLOCK D, PINE TREE PARK, UNIT #4, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. NO REPRESENTATIVE WAS PRESENT FOR C. A. LIGHTSEY, ITEM 14, AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT NOTICES WERE SENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE RECEIVED A LETTER IN RESPONSE TO HIS NOTICE. MR. LIGHTSEY IS DECEASED, AND HIS HEIRS WOULD APPRECI- ATE TIME TO CLOSE OUT THE SALE. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NOTED THAT THIS ALL STARTED WAY BACK WHEN MR. LIGHTSEY WAS SICK, AND IT WAS DELAYED BECAUSE OF HIS ILLNESS. SHE STATED THAT, IN HER OPINION, THIS STRUCTURE COULD NOT BE BROUGHT UP TO CODE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY C. A. LIGHTSEY, DECEASED (10-32-39-0000-1000- 00004.0) ON NORTH WINTER BEACH ROAD, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. 59 M�i 1980 ITEM 15 CONCERNED PROPERTY OWNED BY ALTHERIS SHARPTON. MR. SHARPTON WAS PRESENT REPRESENTING HIS .96 YEAR OLD MOTHER WHO OWNS THIS PROPERTY. HE STATED THAT BECAUSE OF HER AGE SHE SIGNED A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO HIM FOR THE PROPERTY, BUT HE WAS IN CALIFORNIA AND IS NOW WORKING AT THE CAPE AND LIVING NEAR THE BASE, AND JUST RECEIVED NOTICE. MR. SHARPTON STATED THAT HE NOTICED THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY HIMSELF AND PUT IN FOR A LOAN BECAUSE THE HURRICANE DID QUITE A BIT OF DAMAGE. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS RECEIVED AN APPROVED LOAN AND IS GOING TO DO WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO RECTIFY THE SITUATION. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS COUSIN LIVES ON THE PROPERTY NOW, AND THERE IS A HOUSE AND TWO TRAILERS ON THE PROPERTY. MRS. RYMER AGREED THERE IS MORE THAN ONE STRUCTURE, AND STATED THAT THE NOTICE REFERS TO THE ONE THAT IS EMPTY. SHE SHOWED MR. SHARPTON A PICTURE OF THE BUILDING THE COUNTY WISHES TO HAVE TAKEN DOWN, AND STATED THAT SHE WOULD HAVE A STAFF MEMBER PERSONALLY IDENTIFY THE BUILDING FOR MR. SHARPTON. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED MR. SHARPTON IF HE WISHED THAT PARTICULAR BUILDING TO BE REMOVED BY THE COUNTY, AND MR, SHARPTON STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE 90 DAYS TO REMOVE IT HIMSELF. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE EMPTY IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE BUILDING DIRECTOR LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY ALTHERIS SHARPTON, (29-31-39-00000-5000-000230.0) ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS FROM TODAY BY PAIR. SHARPTON, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL THEREAFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND A LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO ITEM 16, LAILA W. JACKSON AND GERTRUDE W. SCHOCKLIFORD. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID MAR 51980 K�� MAR 51990 Box �42AF�s`'86,9 NOT HAVE A RETURN RECEIPT. HE DID CHECK THE RECORDS AND COULD NOT FIND OWNERSHIP IN EITHER JACKSON OR SCHOCKLIFORD AND WOULD HAVE TO CONCLUDE WE DID NOT EFFECT PROPER NOTICE. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED THAT AFTER SOME RESEARCH, SHE HAD LOCATED NEW OWNERS IRWIN AND MILLIE CARTWRIGHT. IT WAS AGREED THIS ITEM SHOULD BE HELD OVER. ITEM 17, SAM AND LOTTIE WILLIAMS, - MRS. RYMER REPORTED THAT NOTICES WERE SENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED. NO REPRESENTATIVE WAS PRESENT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY SAM & LOTTIE WILLIAMS, (22-32-39-00000- 5000-00086.0) 36TH AVENUE NORTH OF 45TH STREET, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ,ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED IN REGARD TO ITEM 18, JAMES WHITE, WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE AND WEST WABASSO ROAD, THAT SHE DOES NOT HAVE A PHOTOGRAPH, BUT SHE SENT AN INSPECTOR UP THERE, AND THE HOUSE IS OVER 50% DETERIORATED AND IS SLIPPING OFF ITS PIERS. IT HAS NO PLUMBING; THE ELECTRIC IS UNSAFE; AND THE WALL COVERINGS ARE BROKEN. SHE DID NOT BELIEVE ANY- ONE WAS LIVING THERE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY JAMES WHITE (32-31-39-00002-0020-00008.0) LOTS 8 & 9, BLOCK 2, HILLSIDE SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND PROVIDED NO ONE IS LIVING IN THE STRUCTURE, THAT IT BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. MAlmiisao _ _ 617 _ � BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT CAROLYN SMITH, ITEM 19, TOOK OUT'A DEMOLITION PERMIT IN DECEMBER of 1979, BUT THE STRUCTURE HAS NOT BEEN TORN DOWN YET. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAS A SIGNED RECEIPT OF NOTIFICATION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSl,ONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY CAROLYN SMITH, LOT 4, BLOCK 2, NORTH GIFFORD HEIGHTS, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM TODAY BY CAROLYN SMITH, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL THEREAFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND A LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NEXT DISCUSSED ITEM 20, REV. WILLIE JONES, AND NOTED THAT A DEMOLITION PERMIT ON THIS WAS ISSUED TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BACK IN 1978. SHE ASKED BUILDING DIRECTOR WALKER IF THIS WAS NOT AN OLD SHOE REPAIR STORE. MR. WALKER STATED THAT ONE BUILDING HAS BEEN CORRECTED,, BUT THIS IS A NEW ONE. HE STATED THAT MR. .JONES HAS NOT REMOVED ALL THE SHOE REPAIR MACHINERY, BUT IS WORKING ON IT NOW, AND HAS BEEN STACKING UP THE LUMBER DURING THE LAST TWO WEEKS, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD RECEIVE A REPORT ON THIS IN THIRTY DAYS. IN REGARD TO ITEM 21, EARLIE B. EVANS, BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED THAT SHE DID ISSUE A DEMOLITION PERMIT. GEORGE YORK APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THIS STRUCTURE IS TORN DOWN AND REMOVED, BUT HE IS REPAIRING THE GARAGE. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT ON ITEM 22, ROBERT W. AND PERLIE W. ERICKSON, NOTICES HAVE BEEN SENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY ROBERT W. AND PERLIE W. ERICKSON (-32-39- 02-0150-001.0) INDIAN RIVER FARMS CO. PBS 2-12 TRS. 15 & 16 IN S 1/2, 62 MAR 51980 - X870 o�c 2 871 LESS CANAL & PORTION AS IN BK. 351, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. ITEM 23, ZETTIE EALY - BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT AT ONE TIME THEY WERE TRYING TO GET SOME TENANTS OUT OF THERE. H. D. ROGERS CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT HE IS THE TENANT AND HAS MANY PROBLEMS, AND WOULD LIKE TIME TO GET OUT OF THERE. HE ASKED HOW LONG THE BOARD COULD GIVE HIM. AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, THE CHAIRMAN ASKED MR. ROGERS IF FOUR MONTHS WOULD BE SUFFICIENT, AND HE STATED THAT WOULD BE SATIS- FACTORY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY ZETTIE EALY (32-31-39-00002-0020-0021.0) LOTS 20 TO 24 INCL., BLOCK 2, HILLSIDE SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN 120 DAYS FROM TODAY (JULY 3, 1980) BY THE OWNER, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL THERE- AFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND A LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NEXT BROUGHT UP A HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY A. J. HARRIS, BUT ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAD NOT SENT ANY NOTICES ON THIS AND DID NOT FEEL THE BOARD COULD ACT. HE SUGGESTED THIS BE HELD OVER UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING IN APRIL. DISCUSSION ENSUED ON PROPERTIES WHERE THE STRUCTURES HAVE BEEN REMOVED, BUT THE DEBRIS STILL REMAINS, AS FOLLOWS: 1. W. E. ORTH ET AL 2. EDWARD STRNAD 3. MS. MINNIE ROSS 63 - MAI�1980 ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT NO SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL NOTICES_ WERE SENT OUT SINCE THESE WERE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED TO BE'TORN DOWN. HE FELT THE ACTION TO BE TAKEN WOULD BE TO AUTHORIZE CLEANING UP WHATEVER IS LEFT AND HE FELT THIS CAN BE DONE UNDER THE PREVIOUS NOTICE. COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THERE SHOULD POSSIBLY BE ADDITIONAL NOTICE AND ALLOW THIRTY DAYS. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE FILE ON EDWARD STRNAD SHOWS THAT HE WAS GOING TO HOLD $750 IN ESCROW FOR THIS PURPOSE, AND NO FURTHER ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN. HE FELT WE SHOULD MAKE DEMAND ON THOSE FUNDS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE GO AHEAD AND REMOVE THE BALANCE AND FILE A LIEN. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER WODTKE FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSION, TO DETERMINE THAT THE DEBRIS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY W. E. ORTH ET AL (19-32-39-00001- 0160-00003.0); EDWARD STRNAD, CONNECTICUT TRAILER PARK; AND MS. MINNIE ROSS, WABASSO, IS DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND TO MOVE THAT SAID DEBRIS BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER, BASED ON THE FACT THAT THESE OWNERS WERE PREVIOUSLY GIVEN NOTICE WHEN DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURES WAS AUTHORIZED, COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WISHED TO BE SURE THAT THEY HAVE HAD PROPER NOTICE, AND COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD PREFER TO WRITE THEM A LETTER AND NOTIFY THEM THAT THEY HAVEN IT FINISHED THE JOB, COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HIS MOTION WAS BASED ON THE FACT THAT WE HAD PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED DEMOLITION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT WE SHOULD JUST SEND THEM A NOTICE AND HANDLE THIS AT THE SECOND MEETING IN APRIL. COMMISSIONER LYONS WITHDREW HIS MOTION AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE WITHDREW HIS SECOND • 'A pr - J MAR 51990 800K 4z PAGE 873 COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO SEE THE COUNTY AND THE ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT GET INTO A POSITION WHERE PEOPLE WITH THESE STRUCTURES DO NOT REMOVE THEM THEMSELVES BECAUSE THEY FEEL THE COUNTY WILL DO IT CHEAPER. HE FELT THIS SHOULD BE DONE ONLY FOR THOSE WHO ARE INDIGENT AND CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY FOR THE REMOVAL AND THAT IS WHY HE WISHED TO BE SURE THAT THE .ADMINISTRATOR HAS MORE THAN ONE ALTERNATIVE. HE NOTED THERE ARE SOME CORPORATIONS INVOLVED IN THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES JUST DISCUSSED. BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER POINTED OUT THAT IT IS IMPORTANT TO MOVE EXPEDITIOUSLY. RICHARD BOSO, PRESIDENT OF THE INDIAN RIVER BLACK POWDER ASSOCIATION, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THE REQUEST MADE IN THE FOLLOWING LETTER: 65 - Indian River Black Powder Assn. P. 0. Box 2913 Vero Beach Florida 32960 February 8,1930 Indian River County Commission T_ndian River County Court House Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Commissioners; The members of The Indian River Black Powder Associo.tion Irish to submit for your consideration and evaluation the possibility of developing a public shooting range. We submit the said range could be located on the parcel of land which lies southeast of the inter- section of 74th. Ave. and 4th. Street, which is owned by the county. A represenitive of our organization would be happy to meet with you at your convenience to discuss this matter further and answer any questions you may have. Si rely r Richard Boso, President Indian River Black Powder Assn. CHARTER IMEMIBER National Rifle Association -National Muzzle Loaders Rifle Assn. Florida Muzzle Loaders Rifle Assn. -Un fai ed Sportsman MR. BOSO INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING AS A NON-PROFIT CLUB TO ESTABLISH A SHOOTING RANGE AND WISH TO LEASE THE LAND FROM THE COUNTY SO THE CLUB COULD HAVE.A SAFE PLACE TO SHOOT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THEY COULD, WITH THE COUNTY'S HELP, SPONSOR A •' 4 PUBLIC SHOOTING FACILITY. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY HAVE WRITTEN TO THE a SWK 4 MAR 51980 MAR 51900 4-2 �Av 875 NRA AND HAVE RECEIVED A GOODLY AMOUNT OF INFORMATION ON SHOOTING RANGES, AND HE BELIEVED THERE ARE CERTAIN FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS AVAILABLE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE DID CONTACT THE PRISON, BUT THE PISTOL RANGE THEY ARE CONSTRUCTING IS NOT SUITABLE FOR THIS TYPE OF ACTIVITY, AND THE SHERIFF DOES NOT KNOW OF A SUITABLE PLACE EITHER. THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT HE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THAT THE SKEET SHOOTING CLUB HAS LOST THEIR LEASE ALSO AND ARE INTERESTED IN FINDING ANOTHER FACILITY. HE DID NOT FEEL THAT THE COUNTY IS READY AT THIS TIME TO ESTABLISH A PUBLIC SHOOTING RANGE, BUT FELT WE MIGHT GIVE SOME CONSIDERATION TO LEASING PROPERTY. THE CHAIRMAN COMMENTED THAT WHILE THE BLACK POWDER ASSOCIATION DOES NOT HAVE A GREAT DEAL OF MONEY, APPARENTLY THEY DO HAVE INSURANCE. COMMISSIONER LYONS INQUIRED ABOUT THE NUMBER OF YARDS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR SUCH A RANGE AND ALSO ASKED ABOUT THE MAXIMUM RANGE OF A MUZZLE LOADER$ MR. BOSO STATED THAT WOULD NEED UP TO 100 YARDS, AND THAT THE MAXIMUM RANGE WOULD BE UP TO A MILE OR A MILE AND A HALF, DEPENDING ON THE POWDER CHARGE, WHICH THEY MEASURE THEMSELVES. HE NOTED THE PIECE OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION CONTAINS ABOUT 35-1/2 ACRES AND HE BELIEVED IT IS HALF TAKEN UP WITH DEBRIS. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON EXPLAINED THAT THIS IS THE OLD SOUTH COUNTY STUMP DUMP WHERE THE COUNTY PUT THE HURRICANE DEBRIS, WHICH THEY PLAN TO BURN. MR. BOSO NOTED THAT THERE ARE SOME EXISTING EMBANKMENTS ON THIS PROPERTY, AND MR. NELSON STATED THAT HE HAD NOT REALIZED THAT THE SAFETY FAN WOULD REQUIRE ONE MILE AND THE BANK WOULD HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ONE MILE SAFETY FAN. MR. BOSO POINTED OUT THAT ONLY A DELIBERATE SHOT ABOVE THE EMBANKMENT WOULD CARRY A MILE)AND HE BELIEVED THERE IS NOTHING AROUND FOR AT LEAST A MILE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THE BOARD MUST TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT THIS PROPERTY HAS CONSIDERABLE WORTH, AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS 67 _ MARM900 NOTED THAT THIS IS THE CLOSEST BORROW PIT AREA THE COUNTY HAS, PART OF IT HAS BEEN MINED AND FILLED BACK IN, BUT PART OF THIS I'S STILL THE BORROW AREA WHICH THE COUNTY WI -LL BE USING FOR SOME TIME TO COME. DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO WHETHER THE FILLED AREA WOULD BE SUITABLE FOR SHOOTING RANGES, AND MR. BOSO DOUBTED IT, BUT EXPLAINED THAT THE AREA THEY WERE USING BEFORE WAS ABOUT 90` WIDE AND THEY USUALLY SHOOT ON THE SECOND SUNDAY OF THE MONTH. THEY HAVE NO GREAT PROBLEM WITH SHIFTING FROM PLACE TO PLACE, AND THERE WOULD BE NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THE FIRING LINE IS NO PROBLEM; IT IS THE IMPACT AREA. MR. BOSO INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE MEETS IN SEBRING AND THERE ARE OTHER CLUBS IN THE AREA THAT HAVE INDIVIDUAL RANGES AND SCHEDULED MEETS. THE STATE RANGE IS NEAR SANFORD, AND THEY USE RUBBER TIRES FOR BACKSTOPS. COMMISSIONER LYONS DISCUSSED THE RESIDENTS IN THE SURROUNDING AREA AND FELT THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE SOME SORT OF HORIZONTAL BARRIER THAT WOULD INSURE THAT NO ONE COULD ELEVATE THEIR FIREARM TO ALLOW A PROJECTILE TO ABOVE THE EMBANKMENT. e COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF MR. BOSO WAS AWARE THAT THE LONG RANGE PLANS FOR KIWANIS-HOBART PARK DESIGNATE AN AREA FOR THIS TYPE OF ACTIVITY, AND NOTED THAT IT WAS HOPED WE COULD EVENTUALLY DEVELOP A FACILITY THERE TO ACCOMMODATE SEVERAL CLUBS. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO COORDINATING MR. BOSOMS REQUEST WITH THE NEEDS OF THE SKEET SHOOTERS, AND MR, BOSO STATED THAT HIS CLUB WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO SHARING THE LAND. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WE MUST JUSTIFY THAT THIS IS A PROPER USE OF THE LAND AND THERE IS ENOUGH INTEREST BY ENOUGH PEOPLE TO TIE UP THE LAND. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED SHE WOULD HAVE A PROBLEM WITH LETTING COUNTY LAND BE USED BY JUST A SMALL GROUP. MR. BOSO ASKED IF THEY COULD ARRANGE TO HAVE A COUNTY -WIDE PETITION EXPRESSING INTERESTJIF THAT WOULD INFLUENCE THE BOARD'S THINKING. 4-:; Box 42 PAGE 877 COMMISSIONER LAY FELT THAT WOULD INDICATE THERE WAS 000NTY- WIDE INTEREST, BUT IT WILL NOT MAKE MUCH DIFFERENCE AS TO THE PRIVATE USAGE. SHE AGAIN NOTED THAT THIS IS IN THE LONG RANGE PLAN FOR KIWANIS- HOBART PARK AND A PETITION WOULD JUST MOVE IT UP ON THE PRIORITY LIST. A GENTLEMAN IN THE AUDIENCE ASKED IF IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO DEVELOP AN INTERIM RANGE AT THE PARK, AND COMMISSIONER LOY FELT IT WOULD BE AVAILABLE JUST LIKE OTHER PARTS OF THE PARK. SHE NOTED WE HAVE A FULL TIME SUPERVISOR OF THE PARK WHO SCHEDULES EVENTS. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT SINCE WE ALREADY HAVE A SUPERVISOR AT THIS PARK, WE WOULD HAVE MORE CONTROL AND IT WOULD BE A BETTER SITUATION. COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED AND FELT THIS MATTER SHOULD BE EXPLORED SINCE THERE ARE 600 ACRES IN THE PARK AND IT IS FENCED IN. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INSTRUCTED MR. BOSO TO TALK TO THE KIWANIS CLUB SINCE IT IS ONE OF THEIR MAIN PROJECTS, AND HE FELT THAT THE CLUB SHOULD SHOW US SOME INTEREST OTHER THAN JUST THEIR SMALL GROUP, BRING BACK A COMPLETE PLAN, SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, ETC. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION FOR THE HIRING OF A NEW VETERANS' SERVICE OFFICER. 69 TO: FROM: MEMORANDUM Jack G. Jennings, County Administrator Robert Donlon, Personnel Director February 25, 1980 Due to the resignation of John Hrkach, I would like to recommend that Jerry Cook be promoted to Pay Grade 13, Veterans' Service Officer. In his present position as Assistant Service Officer, he has proven to be more than satisfactory. He meets all the qualifications for the position as required by the State and County. His appointment should become effective March 28, 1980, and if this appointment is approved, we should start a search for an Assistant Veterans' Officer as soon as possible. _ V R. D. I concur with the recommendation of the Personnel Director and recommend approval by the Board of County Commissioners. /lh J. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 80-26 APPOINTING JERRY COOK AS VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER EFFECTIVE MARCH 28, 1980, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO PAY RANGE, AND ASSISTANT ADMINIS- TRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THERE IS A PAY GRADE AND BASIC ENTRY LEVEL FOR THAT POSITION, AND THE REGULATIONS READ THAT WITHIN SIX MONTHS IF HE IS SATISFACTORY, HE GETS A 5% INCREASE. HE FELT THE PRESENT VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER IS IN A 12 CATEGORY. PERSONNEL OFFICER DONLON CONFIRMED THAT THE PRESENT SERVICE OFFICER, .JOHN HRKACH, IS IN GRADE 12. HE STATED THAT CODY & ASSOCIATES HAVE RECLASSIFIED THIS POSITION AND HAVE UPGRADED IT FROM GRADE 12 MAR 5 19 80 2 70 Vic* - �� 7 p . r MAR 51980 Box. 42 f%&E 879 TO GRADE 13. GRADE 12 RANGES FROM $10,972 To $15,371, AND 13 FROM $11,523 To $16,099. THE PRESENT VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER HAS A SALARY OF,$11,523, AND THIS IS THE RECOMMENDATION FOR MR. COOK. CODY & ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDED THAT THIS CHANGE BE MADE IN THIS MANNER AT THIS TIME. MR. DONLON COMMENTED THAT ANYONE PROMOTED AUTOMATICALLY STARTS A NEW PROBATIONARY PERIOD; THE INCREASE IS NOT AUTOMATIC. DISCUSSIONS THEN FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO YEARLY EVALUATIONS. MR. NELSON NOTED THAT THEY ARE ALSO RECOMMENDING THAT WE SEARCH FOR AN ASSISTANT VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER SINCE THAT JOB HAS GOTTEN QUITE LARGE, HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS SCHEDULED .JERRY COOK TO REPORT TO THE COMMISSIONERS IN APRIL ABOUT THE SCOPE OF THE VETERANS SERVICE OFFICERS JOB. HE ALSO NOTED THAT THIS JOB WAS CHECKED WITH OTHER COUNTIES, AND THEY HAVE IT SET AT A 13 PAY GRADE. THE ASSISTANT ALSO WOULD GO ONE GRADE HIGHER OR FROM 7 TO S. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 71 m RESOLUTION NO. 80-26 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That JERRY R. COOK, JR. is hereby appointed as INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VETERAN'S SERVICE OFFICER to replace JOHN J. HRKACH, said appointment to become effective as of March 28, 1980. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 5th day of March , 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Willard W. Siebert, r., rman Attest: Freda Wright, C�eet MAR 51980 J r MAR 5 19 80 Boa 42. PAGE 881 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RESIGNATION OF VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER JOHN HRKACH EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 27: 1980 AND AUTHORIZED THE PREPARATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 80-27 HONORING MR. HRKACH FOR HIS SERVICE. 73 MARM980 ,l NO. 80 OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, JOHN J. HRKACH has submitted his resignation as Indian River County Veterans Service Officer; and WHEREAS, JOHN J. HRKACH has served as the Indian River County Veterans Service Officer with diligence during a period in which Indian River County has experienced tremendous growth and, consequently, increased the burden upon all of its Governmenta Officials; and WHEREAS, JOHN J. HRKACH has served with great distinction since his appointment on April 30, 1976 to the effective date of his resignation of March 27, 1980 on behalf of the servicemen within Indian River County; and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County wishes to publicly acknowledge and thank JOHN J. HRKACH for his tireless efforts on behalf of the servicemen of Indian River County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board on behalf of itself and the servicemen of Indian River County expresses its deep appreciation to JOHN J. HRKACH for his devotion to the servicemen of Indian River County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the Board wishes JOHN J. HRKACH continued success in his future endeavors. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 5th day of March , 1980. CO R V Chair an, County Commiss' rs C/ U U U U U U U U U U U U V V U U V U U U Ua� U 9 LZ MAR 51980 H MAR 519 00 BOOK 42 F9E 883 ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT AGENDA ITEM 18, WHICH INCLUDED UTILITY IMPACT FEES AND PROCEDURES, AS WELL AS A RESOLUTION IN REGARD TO THE NEW ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FINANCING, BE HELD OVER AND TAKEN UP AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD ON MARCH 12TH AT 10:00 A.M., AT WHICH TIME REPRESENTATIVES OF WILLIAM P. HOUGH CO. COULD BE PRESENT. THE BOARD AGREED. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED THAT THE APPLICA- TION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL ON THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, AND HE BELIEVED WE HAVE IT THERE IN ENOUGH TIME TO GET IT ON THEIR MARCH 20TH AGENDA. HE CON- TINUED THAT HE DID NOT BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY PROBLEM, BUT THAT HE HAD ASSURED CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR LES SOLIN THAT THE COUNTY WANTED TO DO EVERYTHING NECESSARY TO GET FULL APPROVAL FROM THE CITY ON THE SITE PLAN. COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT THE NEXT STEP, AND MR. NELSON INFORMED HER THAT THEY HAVE SENT THE LETTER REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO THE CONSTRUCTOR, STATING THAT THE AWARD IS CONDITIONED ON RECEIVING SITE PLAN APPROVAL. HOPEFULLY, ON MARCH 21ST, WE CAN GO BACK AND SAY SITE PLAN APPROVAL HAS BEEN APPROVED, AND WE CAN THEN CONTINUE ON WITH THE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE, ETC. CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE, HERCULES KONTOULAS, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE HAVE TO SEND REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, INC., TWO SEPARATE CONTRACTS, AND AFTER THEY RECEIVE AND SIGN THEM, THEY ARE TO BE RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION FOR SIGNATURE. WITH THESE DOCUMENTS, THEY ARE TO SEND PROOF OF INSURANCE, PERFORMANCE BOND.- ETC., OND, ETC., AND WE THEN NOTIFY THEM BY LETTER WHEN TO PROCEED. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS, WE HAVE THE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF WE CAN REQUIRE THEM TO QUALIFY THEIR SUBCONTRACTORS, AND MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT WE CAN. HE NOTED THAT THE SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE MADE PUBLIC WHEN THEY SUBMIT THE CONTRACT. HE POINTED OUT THAT IF WE ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE SUBS, REINHOLD'S NEXT SUB POSSIBLY COULD PRESENT A HIGHER FIGURE. HE CON- TINUED THAT A PROBLEM WITH SUBS AROSE AT THE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT, AND THE CONTRACTOR HAD TO CO-SIGN WITH THE SUB BECAUSE HE WAS NOT FINANCI- ALLY STABLE. M�51980 _ 75 _ � ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT THIS PROBLEM CAN BE RESOLVED. COMMISSIONER WODTKE THEN DISCUSSED THE LIQUIDATION CLAUSES, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT WHAT THE COMMISSION SHOULD BE CONSIDERING IS THE RELOCATION PROBLEM AND THAT THIS SHOULD BE WORKED ON AND SCHEDULED SOON. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE COMMISSION THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD NOW HAS SIGNED THE LEASE WITH THE COUNTY FOR SPACE IN THE NEW COUNTY ADMINISTRATION COMPLEX. HE NOTED THAT IT IS BASICALLY IN THE FORM THE BOARD APPROVED, AND HE FELT THAT THE BOARD NOW COULD AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE LEASE WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD FOR SPACE IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION COMPLEX AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN. SAID LEASE WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN RECEIVED. THE BOARD RETURNED TO THE MATTER OF FINAL APPROVAL OF SEAGROVE SUBDIVISION WHICH WAS DISCUSSED EARLIER IN THE DAY, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS FOUND THE STATEMENT HE WAS LOOKING FOR ON THE PLAT CONCERNING THE DEDICATION, AND IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PREVIOUS PLATS SO HIS OBJECTION IS OVERCOME. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE ALSO NEEDED A DEED FOR THE STRIP ON S.. R.. AIA. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF SEAGROVE SUBDI- VISION, UNIT #4, CONTINGENT ON RECEIPT OF THE DEED FOR A PORTION OF TRACT A, AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE, NOTING THAT THE COUNTY WILL NOT SIGN THE PLAT UNTIL IT HAS BEEN COMPLETELY SIGNED BY ALL OTHER PARTIES. COMMISSIONER WODTKE, WHO IS TO BE THE HEARING OFFICER FOR THE ZOI PUBLIC HEARING, EXPRESSED THE BELIEF THAT THIS WILL BE A RELATIVELY ROUTINE MEETING SINCE PEOPLE MAINLY SEEM TO BE IN CONCUR- RENCE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO HOLD IT IN THE COMMISSION ROOM, IF THAT IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE BOARD. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AND COMMISSIONER LYONS BOTH STATED THAT THEY HAVE GOTTEN THE IMPRESSION THAT THERE IS A LOT OF INTEREST AND THERE WELL MAY BE A LOT OF PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE. 76 A*K 42 WE°884 MAR 51980 I ax 42. pAc'E885 IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT THE 201 HEARING SHOULD BE HELD IN CITY HALL, IF AVAILABLE, ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 16, 1980, AT 7:00 P.M., AND THE USE OF A COURT REPORTER AND A BACK-UP TAPE WAS ALSO DISCUSSED. COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR HANDLE THE PUBLIC NOTICES WHICH WILL BE SUBMITTED TO HIM BY CHARLES SWALLOWS. MR. SWALLOWS STATED THAT THIS HEARING SHOULD BE ADVERTISED ONCE 30 DAYS PRIOR, ONCE 15 DAYS PRIOR, AND POSSIBLY ONCE AGAIN 5 DAYS PRIOR. HE RECOMMENDED THAT IT BE ADVERTISED ALL THREE TIMES. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A REQUEST FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO SIGN A REQUISITION FOR AN ADDITIONAL $93,542 FOR THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM, AND HE DID NOT WANT TO SIGN THIS WITHOUT ALL THE COMMISSIONERS BEING AWARE OF IT. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN REPORTED ON THE STATUS OF THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, STATING THAT NOT ONLY DO THEY HAVE 14 LEASES SIGNED, BUT THERE ARE TEN OTHER OWNERS WHO ARE PAINTING THEIR UNITS, FIXING PLUMBING, ETC., AND HOPEFULLY, THESE WILL BE APPROVED WITHIN THE NEXT TWO TO THREE WEEKS. HE NOTED THAT THIS IS A DIFFICULT PROGRAM BECAUSE OF THE UPPER LIMITS SET ON THE RENTS, BUT CONTINUED THAT THEY HAVE THE LATITUDE TO INCREASE THE RENTS BY ANOTHER 10% IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE UNIT IS IN GOOD CONDITION. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE FAIR MARKET RENTAL SHOWN IN HIS SUMMARY WILL BE INCREASED ABOUT 15% BY THE GOVERNMENT ON MARCH 31ST. MR. REGAN STATED THAT THEY ARE ABLE,TO FIND HOUSING IN ABOUT FOUR OUT OF 10 CASES WHERE PEOPLE ARE ELIGIBLE TO BE ASSISTED. DISCUSSON ENSUED ON THE TECHNICALITIES OF THE PROGRAM, WHETHER RENTALS INCLUDED UTILITIES, ETC., AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WHAT CONCERNS HIM IS HOW MUCH WE HAVE SPENT ON THE ADMINISTRA- TION OF THIS PROGRAM IN RELATION TO WHAT WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED. THE BOARD THEN WENT INTO A DETAILED DISCUSSION OF THE SALA- RIES PAID, OVERHEAD EXPENSES, AND START-UP FUNDS, WHICH AMOUNT TO $40,000. IT WAS NOTED WE HAVE 120 UNITS APPROVED AND SO FAR HAVE FILLED 14 WITH TEN ANTICIPATED. 77 MAM 1980 MR.-REGAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY AVERAGE FOUR PEOPLE PER CASE OR UNIT. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT IN ONE CASE WHERE A PERSON WAS OUT OF A JOB AND WAS GIVEN THE RENTAL ASSISTANCE, HE THEN FOUND A JOB AND THEY WERE ABLE TO TAKE HIM OFF THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. MR. REGAN POINTED OUT THAT ROTATING SOMEONE IS THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF THE PROGRAM; CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CONTINUED TO QUESTION HOW REQUISITIONING SUCH A LARGE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS COULD BE JUSTIFIED, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN FELT THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER THAT TO START UP A BUSINESS EFFECTIVELY, IT ISN IT THE COST PER UNIT INITIALLY. THIS IS A FIVE-YEAR CONTRACT, AND YOU WOULD HAVE ROTATING CONTRACTS. DISCUSSION THEN FOLLOWED ON THE MONTHLY OVERHEAD COST PER UNIT, WHICH FIGURED OUT TO $23.00 A MONTH ON 120 UNITS, BUT AT PRESENT WOULD AMOUNT TO ABOUT $200 A MONTH PER UNIT FOR FOURTEEN UNITS. MR. REGAN REITERATED THAT THERE ARE TEN MORE UNITS BEING FIXED UP THAT SHOULD QUALIFY SHORTLY AND NOTED THAT WE DO HAVE A VEHICLE HERE TO ENCOURAGE THE OWNERS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THEIR HOUSING. HE POINTED OUT THAT WE ARE RENTING TO BOTH BLACK AND WHITE AND HAVE ACCESS TO ALL UNITS IN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DID NOT BELIEVE THEY WILL RENT THE UNITS AT THE PRICE SET, BUT COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT WE HAVE OVER 100 APPLICANTS, AND HE DID NOT FEEL THAT $237 FOR TWO SMALL BEDROOMS IS MUCH UNDER THE MARKET. HE STATED THAT HE WAS PLEASED THAT THERE ARE SO MANY TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE PROGRAM, AND FELT THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING AND HOPEFULLY WILL IMPROVE THEIR UNITS TO MEET THE NEEDS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGAIN EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT SPENDING $40,000 OF THE TAXPAYERS' MONEY TO FILL JUST FOURTEEN UNITS. COMMISSIONER LAY STATED THAT IF THIS PROGRAM WERE TWO YEARS OLD, SHE ALSO WOULD BE CONCERNED, BUT IT IS HARD TO GET A PROGRAM GOING FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE STANDPOINT. SHE AGREED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE RESULTS JUSTIFY THE COSTS, BUT EMPHASIZED THAT WE HAVE JUST GOTTEN STARTED. A COMMISSIONER LYONS CONCURRED THAT IT IS TOO SOON TO JUDGE. 78 42�E MAR 51980° :r I MAR 51990 Boa 42 'SAGE 887 MR. REGAN POINTED OUT THAT WE NOW ARE WORKING TO SET UP THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THIS PROGRAM IS JUST THE FIRST STAGE OF THESE ACTIVITIES. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE ALSO ARE ASKING FOR ANOTHER $79,000 IN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS FOR ANOTHER 85 UNITS. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN STATED THAT IF WE HAVE BEEN MAKING EFFORTS AND ARE GETTING REASONABLE RESULTS, THE GOVERNMENT WILL STAY WITH THE PROGRAM. HE BELIEVED HE COULD DEFEND THE COUNTY'S POSITION TO THE GOVERNMENT THOROUGHLY AT THIS MOMENT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED HOW MUCH OF THE $40,000 START-UP FUNDS FOR THE 120 UNITS UNDER THE 60 MONTH GRANT WE HAVE DRAWN DOWN, AND MR. REGAN STATED THAT WE HAVE DRAWN HALF. MR. REGAN THEN EX- PLAINED THAT AFTER WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE FIRST YEAR, YOU ARE PAID $15.00 PER UNIT FOR WHAT YOU ARE HANDLING, OR 8-1/2% OF THE TOTAL RENTAL, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, AND WE WILL BE ABLE TO CARRY OVER INTO THE SECOND YEAR ANY FEES WE HAVE MADE THIS YEAR. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT $10,000 WENT INTO EQUIPMENT SO WE ACTUALLY WERE GIVEN $50,000 FOR START UP, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CONTINUED TO DISCUSS THE REQUISITION FIGURES, AND MR. REGAN NOTED THAT IF WE DON T GET ENOUGH MONEY, THERE IS NO WAY TO COVER THE RENTS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WE HAVE PAID $1,931.00 IN HOUSING ASSISTANCE SO FAR, AND THE REQUISITION IS SAYING THAT IN THE NEXT MONTHS, WE WILL SPEND $93,000. MR. REGAN POINTED OUT THAT MOST OF THE LEASES WERE SIGNED IN THE LAST TWO WEEKS. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS ALLOCATED THIS OVER A YEAR S TIME, AND IF THE FUNDS AREN'T DRAWN DOWN, THEY TAKE THEM BACK. HE STATED THAT HIS BEST INFORMATION FROM HUD IS THAT WE WOULD BE IN ERROR NOT TO ASK FOR THESE FUNDS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE D+ID NOT WANT TO GET TO THE POINT WHERE WE HAVE USED THE $40,000 START UP FUNDS AND HAVE TO GET IN THE POSITION OF SENDING BACK MONEY WE DON T HAVE, HE FELT WE SHOULD KEEP HUD APPRISED OF OUR EFFORTS AS WE.GO ALONG AND OF THE FACT THAT WE DO HAVE APPLICANTS, BUT NOT ENOUGH UNITS IN THE PROPER RATE STRUCTURE. MAREP980 COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD COMMISSIONER WODTKE'S CONCERN, BUT FELT WE MUST TAKE THE NEXT STEP AND THAT WE SHOULD WAIT ANOTHER NINETY DAYS AND GET A BETTER FEEL FOR THIS SITUA- TION BEFORE RAISING THE FLAG TO HUD. COMMISSIONER Loy CONCURRED THAT IT IS VERY HARD TO GET THESE PROGRAMS GOING AND THAT YOU MUST GIVE THEM SOME TIME. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT LEFT THE ROOM WITH A SEVERE NOSEBLEED, AND VICE CHAIRMAN LOY TOOK OVER THE MEETING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, COMMISSIONER DEESON AND VICE CHAIRMAN Loy VOTED IN FAVOR, THE BOARD AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN OR VICE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE REQUISITION FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS, HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM, ACC CONTRACT PLUMBER A-3409, HUD FORM 52663. • r 79 �O 1 MAR 51980 52663 MaK 42 FADE 889 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN U'�Vt:LOPMENT FOR HUD USE ONLY. • REQUISITION FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM %'oucher Numhcr SECTION 23 0 SECTION 8 Date of Requisition Mar. 1, 1980 Fiscal Year ending Date Sept. 30,1980 For Quarter Ending June 30, 1980 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY (lncludinl .alp Code) ACC Contract Number A-3409 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 800, 20th Place Suite 3 Vero Beach Fla. 32960 Project NumberFL-29E132-001 No. of Months in Fiscal Year 15 Type of Project: DEPOSITARY BANK Maine. Address and Account Number) First Citrus Bank Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 Acct. #98-04000-1 ® EXISTING � NEW � REHAB. a. i'?t�umbor of Units Under lease to Eligible Families as of Date of Requisition 14 b. Estimated Number of Units to be under Leese at End of Requested Quarter 85 c. Average Monthly Housing Assistance Payment Per Unit as of Date of Requisition 113 DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE OF REQUIRED ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TOTAL COST INCURRED TO DATE ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL COST END OF REQUUESTED QUARTER CUMULATIVE TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE 1. Preliminary Administrative Expense—Prior to ACC (Account 4010) 0 0 0 40,387 20,064 20,323 40,387 2. Preliminary Administrative Expense—After ACC (Account 4012) 40 387 20.064 20,323 40.387 3. Total Preliminary Administrative Expense (Lincs 1 & 2) NONEXPENDABLE EQUIPMENT, 4. Replacement of Nonexpendable Equipment (Account 7520) 5. Property Betterments and Additions (Account 7540) y' �:,• 0 8,658 0 1,722 0 10,380 10,380 8,658 1.722 10.380 S. Total Nonexpendable Equipment (Lines 4 & 5) HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 7. Housing Assistance Payments (Account4715) 134,754 1,931 93,542 95,473 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 8. Total Administrative Fee Approved for Fiscal Year 17.760 9. Monthly Rete of Administrative Fee (Line 8 dipided by number of months In fiscal year) 1,184 10. Amount Previously Requisitioned for fiscal year 7,074 10,686 11. Estimated Additional Amount Required to end of Requested Quarter 17-760 12. Total Administrative Fee (Lincs 10& 11) INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT AUDIT COSTS (Section 8 only) 13. Total Independent Public Accountant Audit, Costs 0 0 SECURITY AND UTILITY DEPOSITS (Section 23 only) 14. Total Allowance Approved for Security and Utility Deposits 0 15. Amount Previously Requisitioned for Fiscal Year 1G. Estimated Additional Amount Requirud to End of Requested Quarter 17. Total Security and Utility Deposits (Lines 15 & 16) AMOUNT OF THIS REQUISITION 18. Total Funds Required to End of Requested Quarter (Lines 3, 6, 7, 12, 13 & 17) 164,000 93,110 19. Total Partial Payments Received for Fiscal Year to Date 70,890 20. Partial Payment Requested (Line 18 minus Line 19) IST INSTALLMENT 2ND INSTALLMENT 3RD INSTALLMENT TOTAL METHOD OF PAYMENT 21. Requested Installment Payments 23,630 23,63Q 1 23,630 1 CERTIFY that housing assistance payments have been or will be made only with respect to units which: 111 are under louse by Families at the time such housing assistance payments are made except as otherwise provided in the Housing Assistamm Payments Contracts and (2) the Housing Agency has within one year prior to the making of such housing assistance payments, adequately inspected or caused to he inspected (including inspection of grcunds, foeilities. and areas for the benefit and use of the Families) to assure that decent, safe and sanitary housing accommodations are being provided; that all applicable pro- visions of the above numbered Contract have been complied with by the Housing Agency; and that this requisition for annual contributions has been exam- ined by me and to the best of my knowludgo and belief it is true, correct and complete. Indian R r CoMian (Nun Public Housinq ,,, gency) - March 1, 1980 �a vice Chairman (Date) (Signature & Title of Official Authorized to Certify) HUD FIELD OFFICE APPROVAL (Signature and 'lltte of Official A uthorized to Approve) (Date) REGIONAL ACCOUNTING DIVISION Prevalidatedby: PAYMENT FOR MONTH OF APA DNT DATE CERTIFIED FOR PAYMENT CERTIFIED By (initials) (Signature) (Date) - MAR _ _ ._ ® TOTAL Replaces Form IUJD-52663 dated June 19711. HUD -52663 VICE CHAIRMAN Loy INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF AN AUDIT ON THE CETA TITLE II FUNDS, WHICH GOES BACK TO 1975. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, A MISTAKE WAS MADE AT THAT TIME, AND THREE PEOPLE WERE HIRED AND PUT UNDER THE CETA PROGRAM BETWEEN AUGUST OF 1974 AND JUNE of 1975, WHO WERE NOT ELIGIBLE. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON NOW HAS DETERMINED THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS CORRECT, AND WE OWE THEM ABOUT $6,000. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, COMMISSIONER WODTKE AND VICE CHAIRMAN Loy VOTED IN FAVOR, THE BOARD AUTHORIZED THE FINANCE OFFICER TO PAY FROM "PRIOR YEAR EXPENSE" UNDER THE GENERAL FUND A REFUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,4.73.00 AS REQUESTED UNDER THE AUDIT FOR THE CETA TITLE II GRANT FILED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, STATE OF FLORIDA. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, COMMISSIONER VIODTKE AND VICE CHAIRMAN Loy VOTED IN FAVOR, THE BOARD APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER JERRY COOK TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL STATEWIDE VETERANS SERVICE OFFICERS TRAINING CONFERENCE AND ABC CLINIC TO BE HELD IN DAYTONA REACH MAY 3RD THROUGH MAY 8TH, 1980. COMMISSIONER LYONS REPORTED THAT HE AND ATTORNEY COLLINS HAVE DONE CONSIDERABLE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE JOINT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, AND THE COUNTY. HE STATED THAT HE HAS TESTED THE CITY A COUPLE OF TIMES IN CONNECTION WITH WHAT HE FELT IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE MAIN PROBLEMS WE HAVE - HOW TO FINANCE THE WATER AND/OR SEWER LINES ON THE SOUTH BEACH BETWEEN THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS AND THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LINE AND HE FELT IT IS FAIRLY EVIDENT THAT THE FINANCING OF AT LEAST THE INITIAL INSTALLATION OF THOSE LINES WILL BE A COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY. HE, THEREFORE, HAS GIVEN THOUGHT TO HOW WE GO ABOUT FINANCING THIS AND HAS COME UP WITH THE IDEA OF FINANCING THE LINE ON THE BASIS OF AN ASSESSMENT ARRANGEMENT. HE NOTED THAT ONE OF THE PROBLEMS IS DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF S.R. AIA, BUT HE BELIEVED THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT TOO MUCH DIFFICULTY. COMMISSIONER LYONS PASSED OUT INFORMATION ON THIS MATTER FOR THE BOARD TO REVIEW AND CONSIDER AT A LATER DATE. RESOLUTION N0. 80-22 IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, i9gn. MAR 51980 82 v BOOK 2 WE 890 J MAR 51980 Box 42 -PAGE 891 RESOLUTION NO. 80-22 WHEREAS, the Department of Revenue has received requisitions for refunds pursuant to Florida Statutes 195.106; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the attached Requisitions for refunds of ad valorem taxes approved by the Department of Revenue for the named parties on each requisition are hereby approved for payment. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 20th day of February , 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA P By Willard W. Siebert, Jr., -"Chairman Attest: Freda Wright, C,ll/rk/ MAM1980 /f DR -462 DATE JAN 2 - it Revised 12/78 (Sec. 195.106, F.S.) DE ARTME F RE4tNu- REQUISITION FOR REFUND OF AD VALOREM T \ES . STATE, OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Indian River Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida Statutes, Henry Anthony Fischer of. P. 0. Box 68, Sebastian, F1. (Payee) (Residence) lferch%• stakes application to the Department of Revenue for refund of S 1,845.47 (Amount) „i of mone-s paid to the Count• Tax Collector and as grotinds therefor sets tip the following; fat ts: (State reason for Refund) S, The County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correction for 1976 Tax Roll, correcting square footage on building which reduces the just and taxable value from $252,450. to $123,350. This reduces the tax from $3,720.37 to $1,817.82. Dr. Fischer paid the 1976 taxes in Dec. 1976 thereby receiving a 3% discount. With the allowance of the 3% discount on corrected amount, the refund comes to a difference of $1,845.47. Attached hereto is additional proof to establish sruch claim, as follows: - A certified copy of office receipt - taxpayer lost the original. Certificate of Correction of Tax Roll No. 5- 36032 (copy) Sworn and subscribed to ! before me this JZ_ day of P(t l q ? Nry public, State of Florida al Larft ota (Vavee) AV/1A Notar. Pul)f MAR 51980 Boa MAR = ---b19-80 DR • 462 Revised 12/78 (Sec. 195.106, F.S.) DATc11 0 A I{ � i D RTMEf Or EVEI "UE REQUISITION FOR REFUND OF AD VALOREM TAXES STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OI- Indian River Pursnant to Section 195.106, Florida Stat►►tes, Henry Anthony Fischer (Pavee) 800K 42 - PAGE m of P. 0. Box 68, Sebastian, F1. (Residence) Ilereh- makes application to the Department of Re%•enne for refund of S 2.137.09 (:�n►nunt) of n►oncN•s paid to the Comity Tax Collector and as grounds therefor sets up the following fasts: (Slate reason for Refund) The County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correction for 1977 Tax Rc correcting square footage on building which reduces the just and taxable value from $252,450. to $123,350. This reduces the 1977 tax from $4,353.12 to $2,126.99. Dr. Fischer paid the 1977 taxes in Nov. 1977 thereby receiving a 4% discount., With the allowance of the 4% discount on corrected amount of tax, the refund comes to $2,137.09. -� 1 •gas) Attached hereto is additional proof to establish such claim, as follows:- -tip Photo of original 1977 Tax Receipt Copy of Certificate of Correction of Tax Roll No. 5- 36031 ';%�orn and subscribed to before me this of zxai 19 Notary public, State of Florida at larEh My Co si„ion EXFire, April 16, 1933, \�>tari 1'ul►lic M=5 19 00 -A4� /J/2 Rr-MND APPROVED DR . 452DAT~ J N 2 4 1990 Revised 12/78 ` (Sec. 195.1 C5, F.S.) // /I DbPAR T i\ E OF%REVE" UE REQUISITION FOR REFUND OF AD VALt)IJE`l T,%xi.,S STATF: OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Indian River Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida Stattites, Henry Anthony Fischer of P. 0. Box 68, Sebastian, Fl. (Payee) (Residence) Ilerebv makes application to the Department of Revenue for refund ()I'S 1,950.35 (Amount) of moneys paid to the County Tax Collector and as grounds therefor sets tip the follohing f;icts: (State reason for Refund) The County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of t6eF861id'n for 1978 Tax Roll, correcting square footage on building which reduces the just and taxable value from $252,450. to $123,350. This reduces the 1978 tax from $3,852.33 to $1,882.28. Dr. Fischer paid the 1978 taxes in Feb.1979, thereby receiving a 1N discount. With the allowance of the 1% discount on corrected amount of tax, the refund comes to $1,950.35. Allached hereto is additional proof to establish stick claim, :is follows: Certified copy of office receipt - taxpayer lost the original. Copy of Certificate of Correction of Tax Roll No. 5- 36030. Sworn and subscribed to before nie this .1Z_ day of_bn!. ,19� NOt3►Y Public, Mate of My Com Florida at Lar^4i sion Expi►es APri►� Notary tiblic r MAR .5.1980, '. 'BOOK 42, FADE 894 MAR 51980 OR - 462 Revised 12/78 (Sec. 195.106, F.S.) BOOK... :� 1 1��' P ROVED t�� 2 t 198 DATE G CEPA Thi Nr OF hz-V lU 11F:QUI.SITIO,\ FOR IIF:FUNI) OF AI) N'ALORENI I'AXES STATE OF F'LO1U1)A COI. NTY OF INDIAN RIVER Pursuant to `ertion 195.106, Florida Stalutes, O'Haire, Peterkin & Moran 2145 15th Ave., Vero Beach, Fl. (l(esidenre) llerebN- makes application to the Uepartsnenl of lievenue for refund of 359.67 (Atnount ) of tnone�s paid to the CountN• Tax Collector and as grounds therefor sets np the following facts: (date reason for Refund) County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correcti on No. 5-35948 to reduce the assessed value on building which reduces the Just and taxable value to $64,470, thus reducing the gross 1976 tax to $1,180.02. With the allowance of 4% discount there is a refund due of $359.67. There are attached copies showing a refund was approved in June 1979 and this is the second reduction in taxable value and request for refund. :Attached hereto is additional proof to establish such claiut, as follous: Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35948 Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35869 (formerly approved) Copy of 1976 Tax Receipt Copy of DR Form462 approving the first request for refund Svrorn and subscribed to lwfon- rrre this 22 day of• January . fg 80 \otar�I'ul,lic Notary PlArit, State of Florida at Large My Cocr.a:issioa Expires Od. 6, 1?30 k.nG.a bt A.••..aan i..• b Cw+•L/ C�ay�q MA=1980 /z'0' Ham i re� Peterkin & Moran 't Wa► ee) 2 FUND icy D DATC--- TL OR - 462 Revised 12!78 / (Sec. 195.106, F.S.) DEPARTfa E REQUISITION FOR REFUND OF AD/t A1.ORF:e1 ,mv:S STATE OF F LORMA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Ptirsuant to Section 195.106, Florida Statutes, O'Haire, Peterkin & Moran (Pacee) of 2145 15th Ave., Vero Beach, F1'.. (Residence) flerebv makes application to the Uepartinent of Revenue for refund of• S 403.11 (Aillotuit) of moneN-s paid to the Comity. Tax Collector and as grounds therefor sets uli the folloHi i., fact.:: (Slate reason for Refund) County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correction No. 5-35947' to reduce the assessed value on building which reduces the Just and Taxable value to $64,470, thus reducing the gross 1977 tax to $1,322.29. With the allowance of 4% discount there is a refund due of $403.11. There are attached copies showing a refund was approved in June 1979 and this is the second reduction in value and. request for refund. Allached hereto is additional proof to establish such claiiu, :is fomms: Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35947 Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35868 (formerly approved) Copy of 1977 Tax Receipt Copy of DR Form 462 approving the first request for refund Sworn and subscrilwd to Ix -fore nie this 22 day of January_, 19 80 Notary Public Rotary Pubtu, State cf Florida at 1uq4 Nsy Coriimission Expires Oct. 6. 1730 {DnN'j H A..ot.0o. h.* • 4..60, coo.W/ O'Haire, Peterkin & Moran MAR 51900tOOK BOOK 42 -PAGE-89. 7 MAR 5-1980 x. 2/78 rDATE-;��� FU 4wpR1,0VED 'Ro 9 8 OR - 862 (Sec.1 .106 (Sac. 195.106, F.S.) / PARTi`.1 T OF�REVE►J HFQUISITiON FOIL REFUND 0Y AD VALOREM TA\FS STATE: OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida `tatkites, O'Haire, Peterkin 8 Moran of 2145 15th Ave., Vero Beach, Fl. - (Payee) (licsidenc•e) liereliv makes application to the Department of Revenue for refund of C 365.33 • (:lul,okml) of noweys paid to the (:witty Tax Colleclor and as wrotcnds therefor seta kill, tike follouikk-, facts: (Mate reason for Refund) County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correction No. 5-35946 to reduce the assessed value on building which reduces the Just and Taxable value to $64,470, thus reducing the gross 1978 tax to $1,199.15. With the allowance of a 4% discount there is a refund due of $365.33. There are attached copies showing a refund was approved in June 1979 and this is the second reduction in value and request for refund. Attached hereto is additional proof to Stich claim, as follotts: Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35946 Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35867 (formerly approved) Ccpy of 1978 Tax Receipt Copy of DR Form 462 approving the first request for refund Sworn and subscribed to ll,efore lie [Ilia 22 d Of 3anuary 1 19 9b lolary Put,tic Molxy KIrc• of Pion'& at IN" Mr cotar:issioa E:aaas Oct. b, 1480 MAR 980 0'H Peterkin b Moran DR - 462 Revised 12/78 (Sec. 195.106, F.S.) REFUND APPROVED DATE---NOV 2 7 1 79 PARTME J OF EVEN E REQUISPI'ION FOR REFUND OF AD VALOREM TAXES STATE OF FLORIDA COljNTY OF TnAjn P4va" Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida Statutes, Crave$ Brne. Cn. of P. 0. Box 277 L. Wabasso. Florida (Payee) (Residenec) I lereby makes application to the Department of Revenue for ret'nnd of S -51 _ 43 (Atuouut) of moues paid to the Count• 'fax Collector and as Grounds therefor sets up the folios%iur; Faris: (Stale reason for Refund) County Property Appraiser reduced the Classified Use Value from $35,500. to $31,990., thereby reducing the amount of the 1978 taxes. Allac•hed he►eto is additional proof to establish :uc h elaiu►. as follmss: Photo of 1978 Tax Receipt validated in the amount of $606.45 Photo of Certificate of Correction of Tax Roll f5- 30755 Sworn and subscribed to before me this ��� dav7q l • /I � � � t�t�!.�11t1' "fir Notary Public• — Noary Fublic, State Cf Florida at Lara• June 6. 1593, :1' GRAVES BROS. CO. , BY:' (PaNee) 42 PnE-$ 8 r MAR 51990 soot 42: PAGE 899 THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND NOS. 64877 - 65021 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR.- REFERENCE UDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:15 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: CLERK m CHAIRMAN