HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/5/1980MARCH 5, 1980
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO REACH,
FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 1980, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT
WERE WILLARD W. SIEBERT, SJR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE LOY, VICE CHAIRMAN;
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.; R. DON DEESON; AND PATRICK B. LYONS. ALSO
PRESENT WERE .JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; GEORGE G.
COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JEFFREY
BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; VIRGINIA HARGREAVES AND JANICE W. CALDWELL,
DEPUTY CLERKS. NOT PRESENT WAS L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COORDINATOR, WHO WAS ON VACATION.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
TO THE FLAG, AND REVEREND JAMES P. MCCLAIN, PASTOR, TREASURE COAST
CATHEDRAL ASSEMBLIES OF GOD CHURCH GAVE THE INVOCATION.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INTRODUCED PAUL PALMIOTTO, THE NEW COUNTY
URBAN FORESTER.
MR. PALMIOTTO INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE RECEIVED HIS
EDUCATION IN SYRACUSE, NEW YORK, AND HAD WORKED AS A FORESTER IN
FT. MYERS, FLORIDA BEFORE ACCEPTING THIS POSITION.
COMMISSIONER LOY REQUESTED.ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM IN
THE CLERK'S AGENDA REGARDING THE SPOUSE ABUSE PROGRAM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM IN
THE CLERKS AGENDA REGARDING THE SPOUSE ABUSE PROGRAM.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, 1980.
COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 21, LINE 16, AFTER
THE WORD "COVERED," THE PHRASE "NOT ONLY NOW BUT ALSO IN THE FUTURE,"
BE ADDED. ON PAGE 611 LINE 30, AFTER THE WORD "CALLED," THE WORDS
ROVER THIRTY" BE ADDED.
COMMISSIONER LOY SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 44, LINE 19, THE
NAME "HUDNELL" BE CHANGED TO "HIGHTOWER." PAGE 10, LINE 91 THE NAME
"Loy" BE CHANGED TO "LYONS."
e� 42 Bas
MAR 51990
MAR 51900 BOO 42 FAGF807
COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 12, THIRD
PARAGRAPH, THE PHRASE 'BASED UPON THE HARDSHIP AS PRESENTED BY
COORDINATOR THOMAS AND THE HISTORY OF THIS CASE," BE ADDED AFTER
THE WORD "BOARD."
THESE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 201 1980, AS WRITTEN.
COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED A STATEMENT SHOULD BE ADDED
TO THE CLERKS AGENDA ADVISING THAT THE PISTOL PERMIT APPLICATIONS
HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE
BEEN MET ACCORDING TO ORDINANCE 79-27.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION
BE GIVEN ON THE CLERKS AGENDA REGARDING OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR A
PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM FOR THOMAS NATHANIEL SNELL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR
JUDITH A. WAKEFIELD, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR, AND PETE SPYKE,
AGRICULTURAL SPECIALIST, AS FOLLOWS:
JUDITH A. WAKEFIELD:
MARCH 21 (PM) ORLANDO MARINE SCIENCE 4-H CLUB SPECIAL PROJECT
TOUR OF SEA WORLD. THEY HAVE A SPECIAL
TOUR AND PRICE FOR 4 -HERS.
MARCH 28-30 (PM) 4-H CAMP 4-H TEEN RETREAT
. MCQUARR I E
NOTE: THE STATE HOME ECONOMICS CONVENTION IS MARCH 21-22, BUT AS
SHE HAD TO GET THE SEA WORLD RESERVATION IN AUGUST, AND THE
4 -HERS KNEW ABOUT IT, SHE WILL FORGO THE CONVENTION THIS YEAR.
PETE SPYKE:
FEBRUARY 19 PALATKA ST. .JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
WORKSHOP ON PHASE 1 OF THE UPPER ST.
.JOHNS BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN. THE WORK-
SHOP WAS CALLED ON SHORT NOTICE, SO PRIOR
APPROVAL WAS IMPOSSIBLE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT
TENTATIVELY APPROVED THE TRAVEL PENDING
FINAL APPROVAL BY THE BOARD.
MAR X80
MARCH 20 BARTOW
QUARTERLY CITRUS AGENTS' MEETING. SPRING QUARTER
JS DEVOTED TO PROGRAM PLANNING FOR FY 80-81.
MARCH/ KENNEDY
NASA RECENTLY PARTICIPATED IN A PROJECT WITH
APRIL SPACE CENTER
HIM IN WHICH THEY MADE A REMOTE SENSING SPECTRO-
RADIOMETER FLIGHT OVER A SERIES OF CITRUS GROVE
BLOCKS ON A COLD NIGHT. THEY WERE TRYING TO
GAIN MORE INFORMATION ON FLOOD AND LOW-VOLUME
•
IRRIGATION USED AS A COLD PROTECTION MEASURE,
HE WOULD LIKE TO SPEND A COUPLE DAYS AT THE
SPACE CENTER EXAMINING THE DATA ON AN IMAGE 100
COMPUTER. THIS IS NOT A UNIVERSITY PROJECT.
NASA AGREED TO FUND THE PROJECT IF HE WOULD
HELP WITH THE DATA INTERPRETATION.
ON MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLLS, COUNTY
COURT, FEBRUARY TERM, 1980,
IN THE AMOUNT OF $160.76; AND CIRCUIT
COURT, FALL TERM, 19801
IN THE AMOUNTS OF $276.76 AND $25,24.
ON MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC RECORDS
SUCH AS OLD YEARS VOUCHERS AND RECEIPTS, AS PER THE FOLLOWING
AUTHORIZATION FROM THE DIVISION OF ARCHIVES;
MAR 51980
3 aooK 42 F,E808
MAR 51980
BOOK 4,Gq PACE $Q
;ji
NOTICE OF INTENT
t
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Division of Archives. History and
�
TO DESTROY SCHEDULED RECORDS (F
NOTICE NO.
1
PAGE 1 OF PAGES
Rocords Management
Forin DS RM 107 0 72)
J
AND DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE 77
1. AGENCY
2. DIVISION
3. BUREAU
4. ADDRESS (Street, City and Zip Code)
5. CONTACT (Name & Telephone Number)
P.O. box 1028
Mrs. Freda Wright
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
1-305-569-1200
®
6. NOTICE OF INTENTION:
The scheduled records listed in Item 8 are to be disposed of in the manner
�'
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
checked below:
a. Destruction U b. Microfilming and Destruction
TO: AN �� {�O�
c. Other
DEPARTMENT OF STAT — ..
DIVISION OF ARCHIVES, HISTORY
AND RECORDS MANAGET
7. SUBMITTED BY:
TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA $3 t °
I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly
represented below and th t any audit requirements for the records
have pen fully satisfie .
Signature Date
i {- ('Hurt
Fr 7�r-1� (`1 C' (i rc�l i
ype Name 8 it e
8. RECORD SERIES LIST
r36,ff
I.
a.
b.
t,
d•
Destruction
Schedule
Item
Title
Inclusive
Volume
Action and Date
ate ter
Nu,
No.
Datesomp
Approval
1
1
Receipts used as original documents
1959
50 Cu. F
for recording monies received by
1976
the Board of County Commissioners.
1
2
Vouchers used as original documents_
1959
80 Cu. Ft
for recording monies disbursed by
1976
the Board of County Cce1t<nissioners.
9 DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION
10. DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE •
The above listed records have been disposed of in the manner and on
Disposal for above listed records is authorized. Any delettons or
the date shown to column f.
modifications ar ted in red.
19 A zy
Signature Date
Type Name and Title
UuiKaot. Chvision Archi s, istory ,��.�,,� le
and Records Management
Witness
;ji
u
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE GRANT FOR THE SPOUSE
ABUSE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
E
MAR 51980 5
BOOK 42 PA,,,F Q��,,
MAR 5 �0 BOOK .42 mcg 8th
r
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this -5th day of March 1980,
by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY and
SPOUSE ABUSE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC., hereinafter referred to
as SPOUSE ABUSE.
WHEREAS, Spouse Abuse has requested the County to sponsor
a grant, copy of which is filed by the Executive Director, Diane
M. Zimberoff and is attached to this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, County is willing to sponsor the grant application,
condition upon Spouse Abuse providing County with an annual audit
evidencing the use of all funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises the parties
agree as follows:
1. County shall sponsor grant application by Spouse Abuse
as submitted in the attached exhibit and governmental officials
shall be authorized to sign appropriate documents.
2. Spouse Abuse shall be responsible for receipt and dis-
bursement of funds including the grant monies received and shall
provide County, at the completion of the program, or within one
(1) year from date, an audit prepared by a Certified Public Account-
ing firm, reflecting income and expenditures incurred by Spouse
Abuse pursuant to the Help For Battered Homes Program attached
hereto.
3. Spouse Abuse agrees to be responsible for receipts and
proper expenditure of all funds pursuant to the attached Battered
Homes application and in the event Spouse Abuse fails to provide
County with the audit required, County may obtain said audit,
collect costs thereof from Spouse Abuse, including court costs
and Attorney's fees.
ATTEST:
Freda Wr gR Cl.erik
AU yIA114 4s.Q-.
MAR 80
BOARD OF COUNTY COTTISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By L. _
Wi a d W. Siebert, Jr.'
Chairman
SPOUSE ABUSE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
INC.
By = �)ti — -
- - --
_I
of THE S1'41
v � k•
00 W E SpJ54
JOHN G. BURKE
DIVISION DIRECTOR
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING AND ASSISTANCE
•
February 27, 1980
Honorable William C. Wodtke, Jr., Chairman
Indian River County Board of Commissioners
County Courthouse, 2145 14 Avenue
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mr. Wodtke:
BOBGRAHAM
GOVERNOR
JOAN M. HEGGEN
CRETARY
79-AA-06-AE01 Help for Battered Homes
The Florida Department of Community Affairs wishes to extend congratulations to
Indian River County for receiving an action grant award to support the above project
under the special conditions attached to the grant award certificate, which is enclosed.
To complete the processing of the grant award, we are transmitting the following
forms which should be completed and returned as indicated:
Form BCJPA-1 - As soon as possible so that necessary funds can be drawn from the
Federal Treasury.
Certificate of Acceptance Within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt by
you. This certificate represents official acceptance
of the grant and'must be received by the Bureau prior
to the drawdown of any project funds.
Also enclosed is a listing of.comman audit findings, which we believe you will find
helpful in the administration of this award.
An Administration Manual will be forwarded to the project director containing other
necessary forms which are to be completed and returned to the Bureau of Criminal Justice.
Once again, we are pleased that your project has been awarded. If we may be of
further assistance, please do not hesitate to advise.
Sincerely,
J ce D. Peterside
Bureau Chief
JDP/jc
Enclosures
cc: Diane M. Zimberoff
Cliff Guillet
BUREAU OF'CRIMINAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE
ROOM 530 CARLTON BUILDING, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 (904) 488-6001
MAR 51980 Bornc 42;. PAGE 812
Lk
JOHN G. BURKE
DIVISION DIRECTOR
SLATE OF FI0RIDA
1XP/1RINtN1_ OF CONiNIUNIlY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF PU[3LIC SAFE FY PLANNING AND ASSISI/\NCE
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE
ROOM 530 CARLTON BUILDING
TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301
(904) 488.8016 Operations
(904) 488-0090 Administrative Services
SUBGRANT AWARD CERTIFICATE
eou
Subgrantee:
Indian River County Federal Funds: $14,334
Date of Award: February 22, 1980 State Required Cash Match:
Grant Period: From: 1-1-80 To: 8-31-80 State Buy -In: $796
Project Title: He10 fo•_- RaftprpA Homes Local Required Cash Match: $,796
Local In -Kind Match:
Grant Number: 79—AA-06—AE01 Total Project Cost: $15,926
42 PAcF.81
BOBGRAHAM
GOVERNOR
JOAN M. HEGGEN
SECRETARY
Program Area: Part B [ ] Part C Local kXI Part E [ ]
JJDP [ ) Part C State [ ) DF [ ]
Award is hereby made in the amount and for the period shown above of a grant under Title I
of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, P.L. 90-351, as amended, and the
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, P.L. 93-415, as amended, to the above
mentioned subgrantee and subject to any attached standard or special conditions.
This award is subject to all applicable rules, regulations, and conditions as contained in the
Administration Manttal for Subgrant Awards, Financial Management Circulars 744 and 74-7, Law
Enforcement Assistance Administration's Financial Management for Planning and Action Grants
(M 7100.1), and/or Guide for Discretionary Grant Programs (M 4500.1), and Law Enforcement
Assistance Administration's Grant Manager Procurement Manual (M 1700.6). It is also subject to
such further rules, regulations and policies as may be reasonably prescribed by the State or
Federal Government consistent with the purposes and authorization of P.L. 90.351, as amended,
and P.L. 93-415, as amended.
This ,grant shall become effective on the beginning date of the grant period, provided that within
thirty (30) days of the award execution date (below) a properly executed acceptance of Subgrant
Award is returned to the Bureau of Criminal Justice Assistance.
9
Authorized Official
/JOHN G. BURKE, DIVISION DIRECTOR
February 22, 1980
Date Executed
[ xx] This award is subject to special. conditions (attached).
BCJA Revised 7-1-79
MiE5 isao � �
a
STATE OF FLORIDA
Department of Cornmuruty Affairs
Division of Public Safety Planning and Assistance
BI)REAU OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE
530 Carlton Building
Tallahassee. Florida 32301
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Grantee (Name of SPA1: Bureau of Criminal Justice Assistance
Grant Number: 79—AA-06—AE01
Grant Title: Help for Battered Homes
In addition to the General Conditions and Conditions Applicable to Fiscal Administration to which
the grant is subject, it is also conditioned upon and subject to compliance with the following special
conditions:
1. Approval is granted for Indian River County to contract on a sole source basis
with Spouse Abuse of Indian River County, Inc. for the amount of $15,926 con-
tingent upon the subgrantee submitting the contract for Bureau of Criminal
Justice Assistance (BCJA) approval within thirty (30) days of the subgrant
award date.
2. Within thirty (30) days of the.subgrant award date, the subgrantee must submit
for BCJA approval a complete explanation of the functions/activities of the pro-
ject by utilizing the attached "Activities and Timetable" chart.
ADDITIONAL STANDARD CONDITIONS:
1. The subgrantee will include in their first quarterly progress report the degree
to which this project complies with the Department of Health and Rehabilitative
Services' standards for spouse abuse shelters.
•
`� 900K 4,2., PAGE oi4•.
MAR 51990 soox 42 PAGE 815
CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF SUBGRANT AWARD
The subgrantee, through its authorized representative, acknowledges receipt
and acceptance of subgrant award number 79-AA-06-AE01 in the
amount of $ 15,926.00 *, for a project entitled Help for
Battered Homes
for the period of 1-1-80 to 8-31-80 in accordance with the
statement of work contained in the subgrant application, and subject to
the Bureau of Criminal Justice's attached standard subgrant conditions
governing subgrants, as well as any attached special conditions.
Accepted for the Subgrantee:
3-5-80
(Signature of Authorized Official) (Date of Acceptance)
Willard W. Siebert, Jr.
Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County, Florida
(Typed Name and Title of Official)
*REQUIRED MATCH
State General Revenue $---796,00-
Local
796.00Local Hard Cash $_ 796.00
MA 1990 r
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
REPORT OF JUVENILES IN JAIL OR DELIVERED TO JAIL
DURING THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 1980.
REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, CIRCUIT COURT, FEBRUARY, 1980.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NEXT DISCUSSED THE APPOINTMENT OF LIAISON
BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COM-
MISSIONER Loy, THAT PETE SPYKE CONTINUE ON AS THE LIAISON BETWEEN THE
ST. .JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY.
THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT HE VIEWS WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE
YEARS TO COME AS ONE OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL AND VITAL FORCES IN THE
COUNTY. HE EMPHASIZED THAT THIS WILL BE A VERY ACTIVE AND IMPORTANT
POSITION AND WHOEVER THE BOARD APPOINTS SHOULD HAVE SOME EXPERTISE
AND BE ABLE TO ACTIVELY COMMUNICATE WITH THE COMMISSIONERS.
COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED DELAYING THE APPOINTMENT AND
THAT THE BOARD TAKE A FEW WEEKS TO THINK ABOUT IT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE MENTIONED THAT .JOHN TRIPSON SERVES AS
A COMMITTEE MEMBER ON THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT SOMEBODY OUGHT TO BE REPORTING DIRECTLY
TO THE COMMISSION FROM THIS DISTRICT.*
COMMISSIONER WODTKE WITHDREW HIS MOTION, AND COMMISSIONER
Loy WITHDREW HER SECOND.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ADVISED THE BOARD THAT HE WOULD LOOK
FURTHER INTO THE MATTER.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NEXT DISCUSSED THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL AND REPORTED THAT THE BOARD OF -PUBLIC
INSTRUCTION HAS RECOMMENDED DR. DOUGLAS KING. HE CONTINUED THAT AFTER
DISCUSSION WITH THE ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE, IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE REPRESEN-
TATIVE FOR THE COUNTY.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE APPOINTEES OF THE BOARD DO
NOT NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE PART OF THE COUNTY STAFF.
8 BOOK 01
., l
MAR 5 i9a0 eoox42
SCE 817
COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THAT IN MR. REGAN'S POSITION IN
WORKING WITH HOUSING AND IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, AND
CONSIDERING SOME OF THE PROBLEMS THAT THE EOC HAS HAD, IT MIGHT PUT
HIM, AS WELL AS THE COUNTY, IN A MORE AWKWARD POSITION.
COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT HE WAS INCLINED TO
AGREE WITH HIM.
DISCUSSION ENSUED ALONG THOSE LINES AND SINCE THERE MIGHT
BE A POSSIBILITY OF A CONFLICT IN APPOINTING MR. REGAN, IT WAS
DECIDED TO RESCHEDULE THIS APPOINTMENT ON A FUTURE AGENDA,
COMMISSIONER LOY EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT APPOINTING A
PERSON WHO IS ALREADY HEAVILY INVOLVED IN COUNTY ACTIVITIES AND FELT
THIS APPOINTMENT SHOULD BE POSTPONED AT THIS TIME.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION Noi 80-25 APPOINTING
DR. DOUGLAS KING TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
COUNCIL.
nijjmj 1980 �
RESOLUTION NO. 80-25
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That DR. DOUGLAS KING is
hereby appointed to serve on the Board of Directors of the
Economic -Opportunities of Indian River County, Inc.
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the
5th day of March, 1980.
BOARD OF COUNTY CODMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
01
By
W1. lard Z.Si4eed t, Jr., C airman
Attest:
Freda Wright, Clerk
R
PEAR 51990 ,�'�
MAR 51980
eooK 42 MGF 819
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN INTRODUCED KEVIN HENDERSON OF THE
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, WHO PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING
MODEL OUTLINE FOR A LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY PROGRAM:
A MODEL OUTLINE FOR A
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY PROGRAM
(DRAFT)
I. ENERGY EMERGENCY PLAN (fuel shortages)
A. Federal and State Responses to Energy Emergencies
B. Local Response to Energy Emergencies
I. Administrative structure and degree of local control over fuels
2. Assessment of local governments' essential energy needs
a. emergency services
b. utilities, sanitation, etc.
i
i
3. Assessment of other needs, public and private
4. Priority .users plan for local government services
5. Ordinances or regulations for equitable private sector
fuel distribution
II. GOVERNMENT OPERATION AND EFFICIENT ENERGY USE
A. Internal Energy Management
1. Commitment and responsibilities of governing board
2. Administrative/staff energy management structure and
responsibilities
3. Data collection and reporting
4. Purchasing practices (life cycle costing, etc.)
B. Areas of Opportunity for Energy Savings
1. Existing buildings and energy audits
2. Fleet management
3. Utilities
4. Street lighting
5. Solid waste and resource recovery
MA� 1980 "1 . _
III. LONG RANGE PLANNING AND ENERGY
A. Land Use Regulation
1.• Efficient development and land use patterns
a. mixed land uses
I
b. infilling
c. conservation of natural ecosystems
2. Subdivision regulations
a. street and building orientation
i
b. site design (clustering, road specs, utilities, etc.)
3. Other -ordinances
a. exemptions to existing ordinances and regulations
b. landscape ordinances
c. solar access protection
d. extension of services and utilities
B. Construction
1. Energy efficient building codes for new construction
2. Retrofit of existing -structures for energy efficiency
3. Transportation
a. network planning
b. alternative transit modes
4. Extension of services
C. Conservation and Efficient Use of Natural Systems
1. Water (aquifer recharge, storage, pollution control)
2. Air quality
3. Preservation of natural ecosystems
a. transfer of development rights
b. shoreline setbacks
c. vegetation protection
MAR 519042
boos , 42. fsu 821
MR. HENDERSON EXPLAINED ITEM I, THE ENERGY EMERGENCY PLAN,
STATED THERE WAS A GREAT DEAL OF UNCERTAINTY REGARDING THE FUEL
SHORTAGE, AND THOUGHT IT WAS IN EVERYONE IS BEST INTEREST TO BECOME
FAMILIAR WITH THE STATE AND FEDERAL RESPONSES. HE CONTINUED THAT
THERE ARE CERTAIN FUEL CONSUMPTIVE USES THAT ARE ESSENTIAL WHICH HAVE
TO BE CARRIED ON REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH FUEL IS AVAILABLE. MR.
HENDERSON FELT THERE SHOULD BE SOME SCRUTINY OF COUNTY ORDINANCES,
SHOULD A SHORTAGE OCCUR, SO THAT THE PRIVATE SECTOR WOULD NOT Bt
AFFECTED. HE ADDED THAT THE ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE IS THE MAIN POINT
OF ITEM II, WHICH WOULD ACCOUNT FOR ALL THE ENERGY CONSUMPTION. MR.
HENDERSON EXPLAINED THERE ARE OTHER SUCCESSFUL PROGRAMS THROUGHOUT
THE COUNTRY, AND ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS FOR A GOVERNMENT
ENERGY PROGRAM IS THE GOVERNING BOARD BEHIND IT. HE STRESSED HAVING
AN ACCURATE ACCOUNTING PROCEDURE.
MR. HENDERSON ADVISED THE BOARD THERE IS A PROGRAM THAT
IS PARTIALLY FUNDED THROUGH FEDERAL GRANTS. HE REPORTED THAT THERE
ARE NEW BULBS THAT CAN BE USED IN STREET LIGHTING FOR MORE EFFICIENCY;
VANDALISM COULD BE REDUCED IF THERE WAS NO LIGHTING IN CERTAIN AREAS,
AS CHILDREN DO NOT LIKE THE DARK. MR. HENDERSON EXPLAINED THAT
ITEM III, LONG RANGE PLANNING AND ENERGY, IS THE LEAST SECURE. HE
CONTINUED THAT IN AREAS OF HIGH GROWTH, THE PLANNERS OF LAND USE WILL
DETERMINE THE FUTURE ENERGY USE. MR. HENDERSON NOTED THAT THE GOVERNOR S
OFFICE IS TAKING SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS VERY SERIOUSLY AND TRYING
TO COME UP WITH A SCHEME WHICH WOULD BE MORE ENERGY-EFFICIENT. HE
FELT SITE DESIGN, SUCH AS CLUSTER HOUSING, WOULD ALSO MAKE A BIG
DIFFERENCE, AND NOTED THAT ORDINANCES MIGHT HAVE TO BE ADOPTED IN
ORDER TO SAVE ENERGY. HE EXPLAINED THAT IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION,
EXISTING BUILDINGS COULD BE IMPROVED TO BE MORE EFFICIENT, AND HE
FELT SUBDIVISION ROADS COULD BE MADE NARROWER. MR. HENDERSON CON-
CLUDED THAT THOSE WERE THE AREAS THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT COULD USE
TO DEVELOP AN ENERGY PROGRAM, WHICH HE FELT WAS A VERY BENEFICIAL
PROGRAM.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED WHAT KIND OF ASSISTANCE THE COUNTY
COULD EXPECT TO RECEIVE FROM THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL.
MAS 1980
mll
MR. HENDERSON EXPLAINED THAT THEIR CONTRACT EXPIRED LAST
FRIDAY BUT THE GOVERNORS OFFICE IS OFFERING THEM A NEW CONTRACT
WHICH WOULD CONCENTRATE ON PROVIDING EXTENSIVE ASSISTANCE, WITH
FUNDING PROVISIONS.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE LEFT THE MEETING AT 9:20 O'CLOCK A.M.
CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR NUZIE ASKED WHY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
HAS BEEN SLOW IN RESPONDING TO THE ENERGY PROGRAM.
MR. HENDERSON FELT IT WAS A COMBINATION OF FACTORS THAT
ARE VERY COMPLEX - SOME PEOPLE DID NOT BELIEVE WE HAD AN ENERGY
PROBLEM, AND THE ATTITUDES OF THE PEOPLE HAD TO BE CHANGED CONCERNING
THIS. HE CONTINUED THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE NOW FEEL THAT
THERE IS AN ENERGY PROBLEM, AS THEY ARE SEEING MORE INTEREST AND
ACTIVITY.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THERE HAS TO BE A TOTAL COMMITMENT
ON THE PART OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO ESTABLISH AN ENERGY PROGRAM WHICH
MEANS EXPENDING DOLLARS TO DO IT; ALSO IT REQUIRES ADDITIONAL STAFFING
TO COME UP WITH AN ENERGY PROGRAM. HE STATED THAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT
HAS BEEN RELUCTANT TO PLACE A BURDEN ON THE TAXPAYER.
COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT ANY CHANGE IS PAINFUL AND
HE EMPHASIZED THAT IN THE AREA OF PLANNING, OUR CONCEPTS IN THE
COUNTY HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED AND ACCEPTED FOR A LONG TIME. HE NOTED
THAT CLUSTER HOUSING, FROM AN ENERGY STANDPOINT, IS A GREAT IDEA
BUT THE PEOPLE ARE USED TO SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING. COMMISSIONER LYONS
ADDED THAT PEOPLE DO NOT NECESSARILY ACCEPT CHANGES UNLESS THEY
UNDERSTAND THE REASON FOR IT, AND IT TAKES AN ORGANIZED APPROACH,
SUCH AS AN AUDIT, TO GET STARTED.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT THE FIRST THING NEEDED TO BE
DONE WAS AN AUDIT.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT THE COUNTY HAS TAKEN
A GIANT STRIDE IN ENERGY CONSERVATION BY LETTING THE CONTRACT TO
RENOVATE THE COURTHOUSE AND THE OLD HOSPITAL. HE FELT THE AUDIT
SHOULD BE DONE AFTER THE RENOVATIONS HAVE BEEN -MADE.
PSR. HENDERSON STATED THE AUDIT SHOULD INCLUDE THE BUILDINGS,
VEHICLES, ETC., TO SEE WHERE THE ENERGY IS BEING USED. HE ADDED THAT
51980 14 BOOK", pAtF,
.J
MAR 5 i9 o 42,.;%cE 823
AFTER YOU FIND OUT WHERE THE MOST ENERGY IS USED, YOU GET THE MOST
SAVINGS FOR THE LEAST EFFORT, BUT FELT IT WOULD TAKE MORE THAN ONE
FULL-TIME STAFF MEMBER FOR THIS PROJECT.
PROGRAM.
A. M.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INTERJECTED THAT IT MUST BE A LONG RANGE
COMMISSIONER WODTKE RETURNED TO THE MEETING AT 9:35 O'CLOCK
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THE JOB NEEDED TO BE DONE BUT SHOULD
INCLUDE THE OPINION -FORMING CITIZENRY AS PART OF THE PROCESS, BECAUSE
WHAT THE COUNTY MIGHT COME UP WITH MIGHT NOT BE SALABLE TO THEM. HE
FELT THERE SHOULD BE A LARGER TENDENCY TOWARD MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING
BUT THIS IS CONTRARY TO HOW THE COUNTY WAS BUILT.
MR. HENDERSON ADVISED THAT THERE IS A GRANT PROGRAM WHICH
WILL PAY FOR HALF THE COST FOR AUDITING THE BUILDINGS, AND THE RPC
CAN ASSIST WITH INFORMATION ON THIS PROGRAM. HE MENTIONED THAT
GOVERNOR GRAHAM SPOKE OF AN ENERGY TRUST FUND AT THE STATE LEVEL WHICH
WOULD PROVIDE THE FUNDS.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN ASKED MR. HENDERSON TO OBTAIN THE
INFORMATION REGARDING THE GRANT PROGRAM FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR
THOMAS SO THAT HE CAN WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE ENERGY AUDIT.
MR. HENDERSON THEN RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD PASS A
RESOLUTION STATING THAT THIS IS THE POLICY OF THE BOARD, APPOINT
SOMEONE TO PROCEED WITH THE PROGRAM, AND ADOPT IT AS THE RULE. HE
MENTIONED THAT HE HAD SEVERAL SAMPLE RESOLUTIONS THE BOARD COULD
CHOOSE FROM AND USE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED MR. HENDERSON TO SEE THAT PLANNING
DIRECTOR REVER RECEIVED THE SAMPLE RESOLUTIONS, AND THANKED HIM FOR
HIS PRESENTATION ON THE ENERGY PROGRAM.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE LIBRARY AGREEMENT RETRO-
ACTIVELY.
MAPjjj1980 IMIJ5
STATE AID TO LIBRARIES
Agreement between
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DIVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES
and the
BOARD OF COUNTY C011MISSIONERS
of
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
This Agreement, made and entered into this 25th day of
February 1980, by and between the State of Florida,
P
Department of State, Division of Library Services, hereinafter referred
to as the DIVISION, and the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the DIVISION is authorized pursuant to Sections 257.17,
257.18, and 257.19, Florida Statutes, to administer operation, equalization,
and establishment grants for public library service; and,
WHEREAS, funds have been appropriated to the DIVISION under Sections
257.17, 257.18, and 257.19, Florida Statutes; and,
WHEREAS, the COUNTY has made application and certified eligibility
for receipt of a grant authorized under 257.17, Florida Statutes; and,
WHEREAS, the COUNTY has centrally expended for the operation of public
library service during the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978, the
amount of $ 115,126 , exclusive of federal and state
NOW THEREFORE, WITNESSETH THAT the parties hereto mutually agree, in
execution of the Agreement, as follows:
I
The COUNTY agrees to expend gran funds awarded pursuant to this
MAR 51980 Boa.y . 4n> ��E 4 o j n AIS,
MAR 51980
-2-
POOR 42 PAGE 825
Agreement in full compliance with the terms and conditions of Chapter
257, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 1B-2, Florida Administrative Code,
relating to free public library service, and to provide access to
financial" records when an audit review is deemed necessary by the
DIVISION.
II
The DIVISION, for and in consideration of the COUNTY performance
hereinunder, awards an operating grant in the amount of twelve
thousand and fifty-one dollars
($ 12,051 ), to be released in quarterly allotments, in accordance
with the schedule set forth in ATTACHMENT A.
IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties hereto have agreed and executed
the Agreement the date and year first above written.
ueorge rarestne
Secretary of tate
State of Florida
ATTEST:
Clerk of he C'- - � —�' � ,
t ircult Court vice Chairman., Board of Count3 C mmissioners
MAR mw80
ATTACHMENT A
Quarterly Allotments
October
1, 1979
$
3,012.75
January
1, 1980
$
3,012.75
April 1,
1980
$
3;012,75
July 1,
1980
$
3,012.75
Payments
The first payment will be made on receipt of the signed contract.
The third and fourth quarterly allotments will be processed for payment
in April, 1980.
e
MAR 51980 42v .. 6
r
MAR 51980 ooK 42 PAcf$�7
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS
HAVE INVITED THE BOARD AND THEIR FRIENDS TO THE BANANA BOAT ON
LARCH 10, 1980 AT 6:00 O'CLOCK P.M. THE BOARD ACCEPTED THEIR
INVITATION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A.PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE
MONTH OF MARCH AS "NATIONAL RED CROSS MONTH."
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN READ THE FOLLOWING PROCLAMATION:
P R O C L A M A T I O N
the AMERICAN RED CROSS is always there when
disaster strikes;
WHEREAS, the local County Chapter of the APIERCIAN RED
CROSS is having a drive to increase the membership of the w:`
local Chapter; and
WHEREAS, the local Chapter of the AMERICAN RED CROSS
performed many varied and important duties which helped prevent
any loss of life and kept injuries to a minimum during the
crisis of Hurricane David; and
WHEREAS, the local Chapter of the AMERICAN RED CROSS
provides many services to the County, including periodic
blood pressure checks, C.P.R. courses and first aid courses;
and
WHEREAS, the AMERICAN RED CROSS, both on the national
level and locally, provides aid to people in times of distress,
such as fire or flood;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That
Mr
The Month of March
shall be designated as:
"NATIONAL RED CROSS MONTH"
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board expresses its
appreciation to the AMERICAN RED CROSS for the good work it
has done both on the National and Local level for the benefit
of the Community.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Willard W. Siebert, Jr., Chairman
42, 40 828
MAR 5 1980
svK 42 pocf 829
SHERIFF .JOYCE REQUESTED AN EMERGENCY ITEM BE ADDED TO THE
AGENDA REGARDING BIDS FOR REMODELING THE JAIL.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING AN EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE
AGENDA AS REQUESTED BY SHERIFFJOYCE.
SHERIFF .JOYCE EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD THAT HE HAS ENDEAVORED
TO GET BIDS FOR REDOING THE BOOKING ROOM AND THE RECREATION AREA SINCE
THE FIRST PART OF DECEMBER, 1979. _HE THEN READ THE FOLLOWING BIDS:
RECREATION AREA:
WILBUR A. LARKIN $1,4$$.00
HERCULES FENCE $3,725.47
BOOKING ROOM:
BARRY'S ORNAMENTAL IRON, INC. $2,170.00
SOUNDPROOF ROOM:
LAPORTE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $2,675.00
HEDIN CONSTRUCTION, INC. $10,780.00
THE SHERIFF FELT THE LOW BIDS WERE IN LINE AND REQUESTED THE ADMINIS-
TRATOR STUDY THE DRAWINGS, REVIEW THE BIDS; AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION.
HE CONTINUED THAT IN SELECTING THE LOW BID IN EACH CATEGORY, THE
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE EXPENDED FOR THE THREE JOBS WOULD BE $6,333.00.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED ABOUT THE SIZE OF THE EXERCISE YARD
AND SHERIFF JOYCE ADVISED HIM IT WAS 50 FEET SQUARE.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COM-
MISSIONER LYONS, THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE SHERIFF'S RECOMMENDATION
NOW, INSTEAD OF WAITING TWO WEEKS, FOR THE LOW BIDS FOR EACH PROJECT,
AND AUTHORIZE THE JOB TO BE DONE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
ADMINISTRATOR, AFTER HE HAS CHECKED THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED HOLDING THE DECISION AS TO WHERE
THE FUNDS WILL BE DERIVED UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
MAR
•+ �������( Page No. of Pages
1
iu 81.. i,d :,•.x'14 fLr x.. Y`C. + -
•FOIRIT
Ph !ane 461.341 a
Ii
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO
PHONE
DATE
STREET
JOB NAME
60
CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE
JOB LOCATION
ARCHITECT
DATE OF PLANS
JOB PHONE
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
,)u ,piY. e .i ��..5�.-�. _ .. i� l: r�i�;a- t'.�:r?ti A k fence..
. � '1_ ti i.1 :.i.Li.i�., iJC...i. 1s •Y'. .i. a.�.a r., -
Jrtw'L0
Wt f rapDSP hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
dollars
Payment to be made as follows: I
AU material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike s
Any deviation from above specifica• Authorized
manner according to standard practices. alteration or
Signature
tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an
extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents
Note: This proposal may be
or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance,
Our workers are fully covered by workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within days.
MAR 51980 BOOK 4� ME$ 1
r111 Page No. of Papes
1
Barry's Ornamental Iron, Inc.
Aluminum & Steel Fabrication & Welding
1164 18th Place
VERO BEACH, FL 32960
olsn". rcA_Accc
l/
raptanrr tit ropow ! -The above prices, specifications
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance: Signature
PORK 110 COPTNIONT 1000 • WIN ENO♦,ANo auSINESS SERVICE, INC. GROTON. PASS. 01450
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO
PHONE
DATE
I.R.C. Sheriff's Department
March 4, 1980
STREET
1725 17th Avenue
JOB NAME
CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE
JOB LOCATION
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
ARCHITECT
DATE OF PLANS
JOB PHONE
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
1. Booking Room
A. Furnish and install new floor to ceiling security screens and partitions with doors.
2. West Exterior Wall
A. Furnish and install new 1/4" steel channel door frames.
B. Remove existing hinge pins and install on new steel channel frames.
C. Remake existing steel door and install same on new steel channel frame.
3. All materials to be prime shop coat paint.
I,
f
We Frop0SF hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
Two Thousand, One Hundred Seventydollars 2,170.00
Payment to be made as follows: ($
I
All material is guaranteed to be ass /
specified. All work to be completed m a workmanlike C. �
manner according to /
standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above speafrca. Authorized
tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an Signature
extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, act relents
of delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Note: This proposal Tay be
` Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by ua If not .... m.A u..1t—
l/
raptanrr tit ropow ! -The above prices, specifications
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance: Signature
PORK 110 COPTNIONT 1000 • WIN ENO♦,ANo auSINESS SERVICE, INC. GROTON. PASS. 01450
F —
I
B`I 'fi,' cLaPorte Constructioq, f
qc
Custom Built Homes • Additions • Alterations P.O. Box 6312, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(305) 562-9233
March 4, 1980
i1roposal to: Jndian river County Sheriffs Dept.
Attention. Doyle Stroud
Proposed work to be done:
Cut out block wall for a 3' metal exterior door
Take out 1216" petition, 14'petiLion, 8' petition
Move water fountain
Build two 4' petitions, cover with 5/8" AC plywood
Cover ceilings in rooms 8'x 141, 713"x 619" with 5/8" AC plywood
Cover three walls with 5/8" AC plywood
Formica three tables 45"x 24"
Replace 30" solid door
Place shoe mold at bottom of all plywood walls
Cover five rooms with 12"x 12" floor tile. 721 sq. ft.
Labor and material
Total Price
t42,675.00
3oB LaPorte Construction, Inc.
n
it
LIAR 51980 'fie
MAR 51980
DEAN F. LUETHJE, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., APPROACHED
THE BOARD IN REGARD TO A REQUEST FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF HIDEAWAY
COVE SUBDIVISION. HE NOTED THAT THE SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED 500' SOUTH
OF ROUND ISLAND, CONTAINS THREE LOTS, AND THE ROAD IS PRIVATE.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER COMMENTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT DID NOT HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE PLAT UNTIL YESTERDAY
AND A NOTATION REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY WAS
MISSING, WHICH IS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ON THE
FINAL PLAT. HE CONTINUED THAT THE CUL DE SAC WAS ONLY 40' WIDE AND
FELT IT SHOULD BE LARGER; ACCORDING TO GOOD DESIGN PRACTICE, 45' IS
A MAXIMUM FOR A REGULAR ROADWAY.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHAT WAS CALLED FOR IN THE REGULATIONS.
MR. REVER REPORTED THERE IS NOTHING IN THE REGULATIONS
DETERMINING WHAT THE MINIMUM TURNING RADIUS IN A CUL DE SAC SHOULD
BE, AND HE FELT 50' WAS PROBABLY THE MOST DESIRABLE.
COMMISSIONER LOY COMMENTED THAT IF THE REGULATION WAS NOT
WRITTEN DOWN, SHE DID NOT FEEL IT COULD BE REQUIRED.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED CONCERNING THE CUL DE SAC AND IT WAS
AGREED THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME CRITERIA FOR THE AVERAGE ROADWAY
AND FROM THAT, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT COULD MAKE THEIR DEVIATIONS,
AS EACH DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE DIFFERENT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF HIDEAWAY COVE
SUBDIVISION, SUBJECT TO THE NOTATION BEING ADDED TO THE PLAT AS TO
THE STATUS OF THE PROPERTY ADJOINING TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH.
DEAN F. LEUTHJE, OF CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., NEXT REQUESTED
FINAL APPROVAL OF KINGSWAY SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON KINGS HIGHWAY AND
BARBER AVENUE, WHICH CONTAINS 31 LOTS AND EACH ARE 1/2 ACRE IN SIZE.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER MENTIONED AS A POINT OF INFORMATION
THAT THE CUL DE SAC HAD A 40' RADIUS.
COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO CHANGE
THE RULES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREAM,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF KINGSWAY
SUBDIVISION.
MA%1&1980 25
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE COUNTY SHOULD BE GIVEN
A DEED FROM ARTHUR K. WILSON, OWNER, FOR THE ADDITIONAL 15'* RIGHT-
OF-WAY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO RESCIND THE PREVIOUS MOTION.
ON -MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF KINGSWAY SUB-
DIVISION, SUBJECT TO THE RECEIPT OF A DEED FOR THE 15' RIGHT-OF-WAY
ON KINGS HIGHWAY.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER APPROACHED THE BOARD REGARDING OLD
SUGAR MILL ESTATES #2 AND WANTED IT NOTED FOR THE RECORD THAT A
CUL DE SAC HAS BEEN BUILT ON 13TH PLACE, WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE
PLAN. HE CONTINUED THAT A ROAD IS INTENDED TO GO THROUGH BUT WAS
CONCERNED THAT THE CUL DE SAC MIGHT BE LEFT THERE INSTEAD.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT THE DEVELOPER IS GOING
TO BUILD THE ROAD, AND A TEMPORARY CUL DE SAC IS BEING USED AT THIS
TIME.
THE ATTORNEY WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE EASEMENT IN THE SUB-
DIVISION AND FELT WHEN THE MOTION WAS MADE, IT SHOULD BE CONDITIONED
UPON THE COUNTY ACCEPTING A 10' EASEMENT; AND THE DOCUMENT SHOULD BE
AN EASEMENT DEED. HE ADDED THAT THE SUM OF MONEY TO BE PLACED IN
ESCROW SHOULD BE AN ADDITIONAL FACTOR TO CONSIDER.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THE BOARD SHOULD CONSIDER THESE MATTERS
LATER -WHEN ENGINEER JAMES BEINDORF IS PRESENT.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE FINAL APPROVAL REQUEST OF SEAGROVE
SUBDIVISION, UNIT 4, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR PRESENTED A DRAWING TO
THE BOARD.
COMMISSIONER LYONS INTERJECTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE
A DRAWING OF WHAT THEY ARE APPROVING.
COMMISSIONER LOY COMMENTED THAT WHILE SHE SHARED THE DESIRE
TO SEE WHAT THE BOARD IS WORKING ON, THESE DRAWINGS ARE ON FILE AND
THOUGHT THE COMMISSIONERS SHOULD MAKE THE EFFORT TO LOOK AT THEM,
26
19
MAR 51980 _4:
MAR 51980...:1009 42 Vic, 8*35
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE
DEDICATION; THERE IS AN EASEMENT FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY, BUT IT DOES NOT
MENTION DEDICATING THE PROPERTY.
DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT THE DISTRIBUTION OF COPIES OF THE
PLAT AND WHO REVIEWS THEM PRIOR TO BEING BROUGHT BEFORE THE BOARD.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED GETTING A COPY OF UNITS 1, 2
AND 3 TO SEE HOW IT IS DEDICATED, AND THEN DISCUSS THIS MATTER LATER.
ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT IT SHOULD BE TABLED TO THIS
AFTERNOON.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO TABLE THE DISCUSSION ON SEAGROVE
SUBDIVISION, UNIT 4, UNTIL THIS AFTERNOON.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER SUGGESTED THAT HE WOULD PUT TOGETHER
A PROCEDURE FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE PLATS COMPLETE WITH A CHECK LIST,
TO AVOID THIS CONFUSION AGAIN.
COMMISSIONER LOY ANNOUNCED THAT THE TREASURE COAST KIWANIS
CLUB IS ATTEMPTING TO CONTACT AS MANY CIVIC CLUBS AS POSSIBLE TO
ENCOURAGE THE PEOPLE TO VOTE ON MARCH 11TH FOR THE STRAW BALLOT.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REFERRED THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM SCOTT
B. BING CONCERNING BICYCLE TRAVEL TO PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER:
MEMBER
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
® INDIAN RIVER SAFETY COUNCIL
P.O. BOX 132 . VERO BEACH, FLORIDA • 32960 -
February 22, 1980
Zr
Z ,
The Honorable Willard W. Siebert, Jr.
Chairman Board County Commission
2145 14th Avenue
Indian River County Courthouse
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 gQ RQ couITv i `'
Dear Sir, z,
It is the collective attitude of the Indian River Safety
Council that a more concerted effort should be made to com-
plete facilities for bicycle travel within the County and
City. in furtherance of this goal, the Safety Council
respectfully recommends that local zoning ordinances be
amended to require curb cuts and bicycle paths in all site
plan approvals for future subdivision developments. This
change would ensure the creation of needed paths without the
expenditure of future tax dollars.
The Indian River Safety Council respectfully submits this
proposal to the County Commission with the sincere hope that
this can be implemented in the near future.
n
;Re pectfully yours,
Scott B. Bing
President
SBB/abs
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPORTED THAT AT A MEETING RECENTLY,
.JOE j.DLETTE AGREED TO SERVE WITH HIM ON THE CENSUS COMMITTEE, AND THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS HAS AGREED THAT HIS STAFF WILL TRY TO GET
A COMPLETE COUNT ON THE CENSUS. HE CONTINUED THAT RAY DUBOSE, CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE DIRECTOR, ALSO HAS AGREED TO SERVE WITH HIM. COMMISSIONER
WODTKE NOTED HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MEETING NEXT WEEK INVITING
REPRESENTATIVES FROM ALL AGENCIES, CIVIC GROUPS, ORGANIZATIONS,
SOCIETIES, ASSOCIATIONS, ETC., TO TALK ABOUT THE CENSUS — WHAT USE
IT WILL BE PUT T0, AND THE DIRE NEED FOR HAVING THE FORMS FILLED OUT
PROPERLY. HE THEN ASKED THE BOARDS HELP IN FINDING SPEAKERS TO
MAR 5 19 80 28
MAR 51980
TALK TO THE VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.
WOK 42 F%#E 8:37
COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED
THAT HE IS GOING TO CONTACT ALL THE MAYORS OF MUNICIPALITIES TO GET
THEIR SUPPORT AND ADVISE THEM WHAT THE CENSUS COMMITTEE IS TRYING TO
DO IN THE COUNTY'S BEHALF, AS THEIR REVENUE SHARING WILL DEPEND ON
THE CENSUS COUNT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ADVISED THAT HE SHOULD BE READY AT
THE NEXT MEETING TO RECOMMEND MEMBERS TO SERVE ON THE BEACH PRESERVA-
TION AND RESTORATION COMMITTEE.
COMMISSIONER LOY ADVISED THAT THE AUDIT COMMITTEE WILL MEET
AT 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. ON FRIDAY, MARCH 7, 1980 IN THE COUNTY COMMISSION
ROOM TO TRY TO MAKE A SELECTION OF THE TOP 2 OR 3 AUDITORS TO BE
PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE THEN ASKED THE BOARD'S PERMISSION TO
USE THE SERVICES OF BOARD SECRETARY FORLANI TO HELP HIM IN WORKING
WITH THE CENSUS COMMITTEE, AND THE BOARD AGREED.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED HAVING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD
FIRST THING IN THE MORNING INSTEAD OF HAVING THEM AT 2:00 O'CLOCK
IN THE AFTERNOON.
COMMISSIONER DEESON COMMENTED THAT IT WOULD HELP THE PRESS
MEET THEIR DEADLINE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DECIDED IT WOULD BE WORTH
A TRY TO START THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AT 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT STARTING WITH THE NEXT
ADVERTISEMENT FOR A PUBLIC HEARING, IT SHOULD BE SCHEDULED TO BE
HEARD AT 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THE TIME IS COMING SOON WHEN THE
BOARD WILL HAVE TO HAVE WEEKLY MEETINGS. HE COMMENTED THAT IF THE
BOARD MET THE FIRST FOUR WEDNESDAYS OF EVERY MONTH, THERE WOULD BE
FIVE TIMES A YEAR WHEN THE FIFTH WEDNESDAY WOULD BE A DAY OFF.
PETER G. ROBINSO.N APPROACHED THE .BOARD TO REQUEST FINAL
APPROVAL OF LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION, UNIT N0. 3.
ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED THAT ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
HAVE BEEN MET, THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS ARE IN ORDER, AND HE HAS RECEIVED
A CHECK FROM LAUREL BUILDERS, INC. FOR $94,745.15. HE ADVISED THE
BOARD HE HAS A LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 25TH FROM DICKERSON, INC.
VERIFYING THAT THEY HAVE A VALID CONTRACT WITH LAUREL BUILDERS, INC.,
AND A LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 29TH FROM LAUREL BUILDERS, INC. WITH AN
ESCALATION CLAUSE STATING THEY WILL PAY THE DIFFERENCE IF THE BOND
IS NOT HIGH ENOUGH. THE ADMINISTRATOR SUGGESTED THE BOARD MAKE THE
ESCALATION CLAUSE A STANDARD REQUIREMENT IN THE REGULATIONS AND THAT
THE CONTRACTORS BE BONDED, AS HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE COUNTY PROTECTED
IN ALL WAYS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT,
BUT THE ATTORNEY FELT THIS SHOULD BE HANDLED SEPARATELY. HE ADDED
THAT THERE ARE EASEMENTS PROVIDED FOR THE LIGHTING, BUT ALL WE ARE
TALKING.ABOUT RIGHT NOW IS THE PLAT.
ON POTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF LAURELWOOD
SUBDIVISION, UNIT N0. 3, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND
THE ATTORNEY, AS TO THE FEBRUARY 25TH LETTER FROM DICKERSON, INC.,
AND THE FEBRUARY 29TH LETTER FROM LAUREL HOMES, INC., AND AUTHORIZED
THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN FOR THE TRI -PARTY ESCROW AGREEMENT,
AND THE PLAT.
B' ; "
LIAR 5 30
1990 � ¢: °42 �:�
r
MAR 51980
WOK 4 �u $.39
NONE :07-6020 P, O DRAWER 710
39.69.6
February 25, 1980
Mr. Jack Jennings
Indian River County Admin.
2145 14th Avenue
Vero Beach, Fla. 32960
Dear Air. Jennings:
Reference: Laurelwood, Unit 3
Our Job No. H-4340
This letter will serve to verify the fact that the Dickerson Group, Inc.
and Subsidiaries has a firm and valid contract with Laurel Builders, Inc.,
to complete the subdivision development improvements on Laurelwood, Unit
3.
If you have any further questions pertaining to this, please give me a
call.
regards.
Very truly yours,
711E DIaMIS N GROUP, INC. &
SUBSIDIARIES
OLL-
n
s R. Widmann,
President
JR1G : slm
Y
MAS 1980 �- -
P. O. BOX 789 ® FERN PARK ■ FLORIDA 32790
TELEPHONE 891.2211
February 29, 1980
Mr. Jack G. Jennino-s
County Administrator
Indian River County Courthouse
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: Laurelwood, Unit 3
Indian River County
Dear Mr. Jennings:
This will confirm that Laurel Builders has a firm and valid
contract with Dickerson, Inc. of Stuart, Florida, for the
construction and installation of Laurelwood, Unit 3 subdivision
development improvements, as evidenced by the attached
?ebruary 25, 1980 letter from James R. Widmann, Vice President.
If, in the unlikely event, there is a quantity overrun or
price increase prior to completion of construction, Laurel
Builders will pay said increase and finish Laurelwood, Unit 3
improvements.
Yours truly,
LAUREL BUILDERS, INC.
Robert T. Shutts
Executive Vice President
R`PS/eh
cc: Peter G. Robinson
MAR 5 19 00
42 84.0
MAR 51980
boot �� mcg
TRI -PARTY ESCROW AGREEMENT=
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 15th day of
February, 1980, by and between LAUREL BUILDERS, INC., a Florida
corporation, Developer of the subdivision LAURELWOOD, UNIT 3, and
the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, ?LORIDA.
W I T N E S S E T Hs
1. The Developer hereby deposits in escrow with the BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, the sum of
NINETY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY FIVE AND 15/100 ($94,745.15)
DOLLARS, to guarantee that street paving and storm drainage improve-
ments set forth on plans and specifications for Laurelwood, Unit 3,
will be fully completed and paid for. Said funds have been furnished
by BANCSHARES PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation.
2. The BOARD agrees to hold said funds and to pay the same
out in the following manner:
(a) To the Developer upon request and upon proof satis-
factory to the BOARD that work has progressed satisfactorily to the
state of development for which the payment is made, said proof to in-
clude a Certificate to that effect signed by the Developer and the
County Administrator, and upon proof satisfactory to the BOARD that
all bills therefor have been paid to date, including, but not limit-
ing thereto, bills for surveying, engineering, and land clearing, and
work and material used in the street paving and storm drainage facil-
ities which are included in the plan of development.
(b) Upon determination that any portion or all of the
said improvements have not been performed by the Developer within
365 calender days from the date of this Agreement, the BOARD is here-
by authorized, but not obligated, to take over and perform any such
uncompleted work and to use for such purposes the remaining funds so
deposited in escrow.
(c) Further, the BOARD is authorized to pay any bills
for said improvements upon proof satisfactory to the BOARD that such
claims are just and unpaid, and the Developer hereby consents to any
such payments and authorizes and ratifies any such action on the part
of the BOARD and agrees to protect and save harmless said BOARD from
any claims of any persons whomsoever on account of any improvements
which may not have been completed or Maid for.
(d) Ten percent (10%) of the entire escrow deposit shall
be held by the BOARD pending final completion of improvements and cer-
tification by the Developer's engineer and the County Administrator
that the improvements have been completed satisfactorily and that all
work and materials have been paid in full. •
(e) After the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS is satisfied
that all work has been satisfactorily completed and all bills for work
and materials have been paid, the BOARD shall return to BANCSHARES
PROPERTIES, INC. at 150 S. E. 3rd Ave., Miami, Florida 33101, attn:
Stella G. Nickas, Assistant Vice President any funds remaining in the
escrow account.
1 of 2
THIS TRI -PARTY ESCROW AGREEMENT, signed and sealed the
day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
X � �f��l�-�-'� •/` �.���� K �. fes{,(
i..
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
2 of 2
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
C AIRMAN OFT BOARD /
ATTEST
CLERK OF THE BOARD
LAUREL BUILDERS, INC.
BY : / `,yLrt/T'v i- 7-c�;���
ROBERT T. SHUTTS
EXECUTIVE VICEP SIDENT
1 r
ATTEST: t. ,"` i . a
MARTHA SEELY, SECRE7AKY
BANCSHARES PROPERTIES, INC,
BY
Vice President
ATTEST:
Assistant Secretary
MAR 51980 42 nu 843
.JIM FLYNN, OF THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT, APPROACHED THE
BOARD AND PRESENTED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING MEDICAL
COVERAGE FOR THE COUNTY:
COMPARISON 01' INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH, LIFE
& ADD INSURANCE COVERAGE
Accident N -
BLUE CROSS Co. A.
Co. B.
Life Ins. & ADD
3,000 3,000
3,000
Benefit
( 1.00 per M) ( .63 Per
M) ( .61 per M)
_Hospital Room &
12,655.75; per year
151,869.00
Board (Semi -Private)
95.00 per day for 31 days,
3.00 per month,
Deductable per
then BC will pay 80 % of the
-----------'--------------------------'--------'-----
Calendar Year
amount in excess of the 95.00 100 %
100 %
Hospital Misc..
Max. (out of pocket)
93 @
expense
100 % (with the exception of
calendar year for
700 (single)
any extra charge for use of
$00 (family)
11, 183.25, per year
a television and for the issue
LIFE & ADD
248 @
of an "admission kite. 80 %
100 %
Sargi a� 1 P.Xp.,4e
100 % of the fee as compared
with the Blue Cross Rate
TOTAL FOR YEAR. . . . . . . . .$ 171,930.96
schedule ( Max of the 1st 333.00)
then the employee pays his 100.00
deductable (unless otherwise
satisfied). Blue Cross will then
pay the next 3,000.00 at 80 %, the
employee will then pay 20 % or
600.00. The balance is then paid
by Blue Cross up to the life time
benefit. 100 %
100 %
Cost of Blood
Covered
NO YES
YES
Supplemental
248 employees. (
Accident N -
and 155 employees have dependents)
DeductableT
150.00
Max. life time
3,038.00; per year
Benefit
250,000.00
155 @
Co -Insurance
12,655.75; per year
151,869.00
Insurance
3,000.00
3.00 per month,
Deductable per
8,928.00
-----------'--------------------------'--------'-----
Calendar Year
100 (single)
I
200 (family)
Max. (out of pocket)
93 @
for employee per
2690.49, per year
calendar year for
700 (single)
covered expenses.
$00 (family)
This Company will pay 100 %
of the first 2,000.00 of all
consolidated expenses before
the employee pays his 100.00
deductable. then this company
pays the next 2500.00 at 80 %
and the employee pays 20 % or
500.00. This company will then
pay the balance up to the life
time benefit.
300.00 300.00
250,000.00 250,000.00
2,500.00 2,500.00
100 (single) 100 (single)
200 (family) 200 (family)
Co. C.
3,000
( .65 per M)
80 %
80 %
80 %
YES
300.00
250,000.00
2,500.00
100 (single)
200 (family)
600 (single) 600 (single)* 600 (single)
700 (family) 700 (family)* 700 (family)
* Max. for two consecutive
calendar years.
This comparison based on
248 employees. (
93 employees are single
and 155 employees have dependents)
BLUE CROSS RATES:
93 @
32.56 per month,
3,038.00; per year
36,336.00
HEALTH
155 @
81.65 per month,
12,655.75; per year
151,869.00
LIFE & ADD
248 @
3.00 per month,
744.00, per year
8,928.00
-----------'--------------------------'--------'-----
TOTAL FOR YEAR.. . . . . . . . $ 197,133.00
COMPANY B RATES:
93 @
28.93 per month,
2690.49, per year
--"-----
32,285.88
HEALTH
155 @
72.15'per month,
11, 183.25, per year
134,199.00
LIFE & ADD
248 @
1.83 per month,
453.84 per year
5,446.08
TOTAL FOR YEAR. . . . . . . . .$ 171,930.96
*********SAVINGS*********** $ 251202.04 ******************
WiAP061980 5
MR. FLYNN FELT THAT FOR THE MONEY THE COUNTY IS PAYING
TO BLUE CROSS, THEY SHOULD HAVE BETTER COVERAGE. HE EXPLAINED THAT
THE SURGICAL EXPENSE FOR BLUE CROSS IS BASED UPON A RATE SCHEDULE
ESTABLISHED IN 1960; ALSO, THE COST OF BLOOD IS NOT COVERED BY BLUE
CROSS BUT WOULD BE IF THE COUNTY FORMED A BLOOD BANK. HE REVIEWED
THE OTHER ITEMS ON THE COMPARISON SHEET AND FELT THE COUNTY COULD
SAVE $25,202.04 A YEAR BY USING COMPANY B.
MR. D. CHALMERS OF THE WARREN ZEUCH AGENCY, REPRESENTING
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., COMMENTED THAT ANY COMPANY WOULD
DRAFT A PLAN ACCORDING TO THE COUNTY'S SPECIFICATIONS. HE EXPLAINED
HOW THE SCHOOL BOARD HAS AN INSURANCE PLAN WHERE THEIR SURPLUS IS
PUT INTO AN INTEREST-BEARING ACCOUNT.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT BLUE CROSS IS
HOLDING OUR SURPLUS FUNDS IN CASE THE COUNTY HAS A BAD YEAR - IF WE
CANCEL OUR POLICY WITH THEM, WE LOSE THE $45,000 THAT HAS BEEN
ACCUMULATED,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE COUNTY HAD HIRED A CONSULTANT
TO STUDY THE INSURANCE AND HE ADVISED THAT YOU CANNOT BID INSURANCE.
HE COMMENTED THAT THERE WERE CERTAIN RULES AND REGULATIONS IN BIDDING;
ALSO CERTAIN CRITERIA FOR PROPOSALS.
MR. FLYNN FELT THE COUNTY COULD BID ON A BASE INSURANCE
POLICY AND THEN NEGOTIATE. HE ADDED THAT A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE
STATE INSURANCE COMMISSION CAN ASSIST THE COUNTY IN THIS MATTER.
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THE COUNTY SHOULD SEE WHERE IT CAN
GET MORE FOR ITS MONEY.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON SUGGESTED THE COUNTY DEVELOP
PROPOSALS, EVALUATE THEM, AND USE THE SERVICES OF THE STATE INSURANCE
REPRESENTATIVE TO HELP GET IT INTO THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR.
MR, FLYNN SUGGESTED HAVING THIS TAKE PLACE IN AUGUST, WHICH
WILL GIVE THE COUNTY 30 DAYS TO MAKE THE TRANSITION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATION OFFICE
36 g
MAR 51980 vZ-0844
MAR 51980
ot6 42 PA.rE* 845'
TO SEEK PROPOSALS FOR HEALTH, LIFE, AND ADDITIONAL INSURANCE COVERAGES
AND REPORT THEIR FINDINGS TO THE BOARD.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY IS BECOMING A
MORE COMPLEX BODY, THE REGULATIONS FROM TALLAHASSEE ARE MUCH GREATER,
AND THE CONTACT THAT WE SEEM TO BE HAVING WITH TALLAHASSEE HAS
INCREASED. HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS APPROPRIATE TO HAVE SOME DIRECT
REPRESENTATION IN TALLAHASSEE WHO IS AVAILABLE FOR VARIOUS NEEDS THAT
ARISE PERIODICALLY. THE ATTORNEY FELT WHOEVER WE BECAME INVOLVED WITH
SHOULD HAVE LEGAL BACKGROUND AND HAVE EXPERIENCE IN TALLAHASSEE, AND
SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY CONSIDER HIRING AN INDIVIDUAL OR FIRM ON
AN HOURLY BASIS SO THAT THIS PERSON WOULD-BE AVAILABLE TO THE COUNTY.
THE ATTORNEY COMMENTED THAT WE NEED MORE INPUT AND REPRESENTATION
DIRECTLY AT THE SOURCE OF WHERE THE RULES AND REGULATIONS AFFECTING
US ARE BEING MADE.
MOTION WAS MADE.BY COMMISSIONER LYONS TO AUTHORIZE THE
ATTORNEY TO USE THE SERVICES OF SUCH A PERSON OR A FIRM OF HIS CHOICE
AS REQUIRED FROM TIME TO TIME.
THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT EXPRESSED INTEREST IN WHAT IT IS GOING TO
COST THE COUNTY.
THE ATTORNEY STATED HE WAS SURE THE BUDGET WILL BE OVER-
RUN BY THE END OF THE YEAR IN THAT AREA BUT WOULD LIKE LIMITED HELP
RIGHT NOW.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO COME BACK WITH
SOME RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD AND, IN THE INTERIM, HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO EMPLOY COMPETENT HELP IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,500.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RECESSED AT 12:10 O'CLOCK
P.M. FOR LUNCH AND RECONVENED AT 1:45 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME
MEMBERS PRESENT.
ENGINEER JAMES BEINDORF CAME BEFORE THE BOARD IN REGARD
TO FINAL APPROVAL OF OLD SUGAR MILL ESTATES, UNIT #2, AND NOTED THAT
37
MAIW1980 -- -- -
HE HAD WRITTEN TO ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ITEMIZING THE WORK NOT
YET COMPLETED, AS FOLLOWS:
February 26, 1980
Mr. Jack G. Jennings
County Administrator
Indian River County
Room 115 County Courthouse
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: Final Plat
Old Sugar Mill Estates #2
Dear Mr. Jennings:
I am enclosing seven copies of the final plat for'the subject job. I would
appreciate your placing this on the March 5, 1980, agenda for final approval.
I am also listing below the amount of monies to cover three items of work not
yet completed. This will serve as my estimate for bond purposes.
1. Road Signs 4 Ea. @ $100.00 $ 400.00
2.- Grass for Shoulders 6600 S.Y. @ 25G 1,650.00
3. Road in Front of Lot 7 330 S.Y. @ $5.50 1,815.00
$3,865.00
I will have a check in the amount of $3,865.00 at the March 5, 1980, meeting.
Very truly yours,
BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
ames L. Beindorf
JLB:mk
Approval recommended:
n
MR. BEINDORF EXPLAINED THAT THEY HAVE -NOT PAVED ALL THE
ROAD IN FRONT OF LOT 7, BUT WHEN THEY EXTEND THE ROAD, THEY WILL
CONTINUE TO PAVE IN FRONT OF LOT 7, AND HE WANTED TO POST BOND TO
38
MAR 51980 a .429%%846
.42. ;AGF'847
COVER THIS. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE CONFORMED WITH
EVERYTHING THEY AGREED TO D0; IN ADDITION, THE GRASSING I$ NOW DONE,
BUT RATHER THAN CHANGE THE LETTER AND THE CHECK, THEY WILL PUT UP
A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,865.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THE BOARD HAD AGREED TO GRANT
APPROVAL WITH THREE CONDITIONS: (1) RECEIPT OF THE CHECK, (2) A
REFERENCE IN THE MINUTES THAT THE CUL DE SAC WAS NOT PERMANENT, AND
(3) RECEIPT OF AN EASEMENT DEED FOR 10'.
MR. BEINDORF STATED THAT HE DID RECORD THE DEED AND EXPLAINED
THAT THEY PUT A DITCH ON THE PROPERTY LINE SO IF THE PROPERTY TO THE
WEST DEVELOPS, THERE WILL NOT BE A DUAL DITCH.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF OLD SUGAR (MILL
ESTATES UNIT #2.BASED ON THE TWO CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE SET OUT
ABOVE AND THE RECORDING_OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THAT THE MINUTES REFER TO THE
ENGINEER S STATEMENT THAT THE CUL DE SAC ON 13TH PLACE IS A TEMPORARY
CUL DE SAC, AND ADMINISTRATOR ,JENNINGS ASKED THAT THE MINUTES SET
OUT THAT MR. BEINDORF INTENDS TO HAVE THIS FULLY COMPLETED WITHIN
60 DAYS.
THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO -WIT:
39
MARII&980
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: °
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
in the matter of
in the
Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
Dom, Z"O
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed�efore�ne this r day of(�L_ A.I�/�C/
vv v
(SEAL)
iness Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, IMian River County, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY- GIVEN that the
Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian
River County, Florida, has tentatively ap-
proved the following changes and additions to
'the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County,
Florida, which changes and .additions are
substantially as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property situated
at the southeast corner of the intersection of
S.R. 60 and 82nd Avenue in Indian River
County, Florida, to wit:
The North 660.1t, of the West 10.82 acres of
Tract 12, Section 1, Township 33 South, Range
38 East, exclusive of rights-of-way, Indian
River Farms Co. Subd., Plat Book 2, Page 25,
OR Book 99, Page 21.
Be changed from R-3 Multiple Dwelling
District to GAA Restricted Commercial
District.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
Planning, and Zoning Commission in the.
County Commission Room, Indian River
County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Thursday, January 24, 1980, at 7:30 P.M., after
which said public hearing in relation thereto at
which parties in interest and citizens shall
have an opportunity to be heard will be held by
the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, in the County Com-
mission Room, Indian River County Cour-
thouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday,
March.$, 1980, at 2:00 P.M.
Board of Cruaty commissioners.
Indian River -County
By:. William C. Wodtke Jr., Chairman
Indian River County Planning
and.Zoning Commission
By: Dick Bird, Chairman
Jan. 6,9,1980.'
NOTICES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WERE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING
PROPERTY OWNERS BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY
FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66, COPIES OF SAID NOTICES BEING ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
HARRY W. & MURIEL D. CLAYTON
GLEN & EFFIE MILLIMAN
WILLIAM GORE & LEILA PEEBLES GORE
CHARLES E. STANFORD ENTERPRISES, INC.
STRAZZULA BROS. CO., INC.
JACK & BESSIE MARCOSKI
MAR 51980
"
r
MAR 51980 som 42 FAGS 849?
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 4.5 ACRES ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF RANCH ROAD (82ND AVE.) AND S.R. 60. THE APPLICANT INTENDS
TO CONSTRUCT A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS. IT IS PRESENTLY
UNDEVELOPED, AND THERE IS A GROVE AND MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE NORTH
AND A TRUCK STOP TO THE WEST. MR. REVER CONTINUED THAT AN ANALYSIS
WAS DONE BY STAFF, AND IT IS.THEIR RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS REZONING
SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED BASED ON THE FACT THAT THERE ALREADY IS
APPROXIMATELY 170 ACRES OF EXISTING B-1, WHICH WILL ALLOW ALMOST
EVERYTHING TO HAPPEN THE SAME AS IN C-1 OR C-lA,WITH THE EXCLUSION
OF A GAS SERVICE STATION. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THERE ARE NUMEROUS
OTHER FACILITIES WITHIN A MILE AND A HALF TO THE WEST, AND HE FELT
THE EXISTING B-1 WAS AMPLE TO SUPPLY THE PRESENT AND FUTURE NEEDS
FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AREA. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER
COMMENTED THAT THE PLANNING & ZONING, BOARD, RATHER THAN CHANGE THE
WHOLE PARCEL TO C -1A, PREFERRED TO COMPROMISE AND HAVE -A SMALLER
PARCEL OF APPROXIMATELY 3/4 OF AN ACRE FOR THE GAS PUMPS AND THE
REMAINDER PUT INTO B-1. HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS THE STAFF'S CONTENTION
THAT THIS DOES NOT ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEM ANY, AND THERE IS NO
ADDITIONAL NEED FOR EITHER IN THE VICINITY. THE PLANNING & ZONING
BOARD VOTED 3-2 IN FAVOR OF REZONING TO C-lA AND B-1, BUT THE PLANNING
STAFF DOES NOT RECOMMEND THIS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INQUIRED AS TO THE RATIONALE FOR REZONING
THE ENTIRE PARCEL WHEN THEY JUST INTEND TO BUILD A CONVENIENCE STORE,
AND THE PLANNING DIRECTOR DID NOT KNOW THAT THERE WAS ANY PARTICULAR
RATIONALE.
ATTORNEY GORDON JOHNSTON APPEARED REPRESENTING MR. ,AND MRS.
CLAYTON, THE APPLICANTS. HE FELT THE VOTE OF THE PLANNING & ZONING
COMMISSION WAS 4 TO 1 IN FAVOR OF THE REZONING, BUT PLANNING DIRECTOR
REVER STATED THAT IT WAS NOT.
ATTORNEY JOHNSTON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WHEN THIS REQUEST
ORIGINALLY WAS SUBMITTED, THEY HAD A CONTRACT CONTINGENT ON REZONING
TO ALLOW A SERVICE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS, SIMILAR TO THE 7-11 STORES
AROUND THE COUNTY. HE EXPLAINED THAT MR. CLAYTON ASKED HIM WHAT HE
THOUGHT ABOUT HAVING ADDITIONAL PROPERTY REZONED, AND HE HAD ADVISED
MR. CLAYTON THAT HE FELT IT WOULD BE EASIER TO DO IT ALL AT ONCE.
HE NOTED THAT MR. CLAYTON ALSO OWNS FIVE ACRES IMMEDIATELY TO THE
SOUTH, FOR WHICH HE IS NOT REQUESTING REZONING. ATTORNEY JOHNSTON
NOTED THAT ACTUALLY THERE IS ONLY ONE PIECE SPECIFICALLY ZONED
COMMERCIAL (C-1) IN THIS AREA, THE REST IS B-1. HE'POINTED OUT THAT
NOT TOO LONG AGO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANTED A REZONING
REQUEST THAT WILL ALLOW A LARGE INFLUX OF PEOPLE AT VILLAGE GREEN,
WHICH WILL REQUIRE SOME SERVICE AREAS,AND HE FELT A MAJOR INTERSECTION
IS WHERE THIS TYPE OF ZONING SHOULD TAKE PLACE SO THERE WOULD BE A
GOOD TRAFFIC FLOW. ATTORNEY JOHNSTON NOTED THAT ALL OF THIS B-1
PROPERTY IS BEING STUDIED BY THE PLANNING STAFF, AND HE BELIEVED
THEY HAVE STATED THAT IF THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE MASTER PLAN, SOME
OF THESE B-1 AREAS WOULD BE CUT DOWN IN SIZE OR ELIMINATED. HE
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT AT THE PREVIOUS PUBLIC HEARING THERE WERE NO
OBJECTIONS TO THE REZONING FROM THE AUDIENCE AND THE ONLY COMMENTS
FROM PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE VICINITY WERE FAVORABLE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THEY SELL GASOLINE AT THE TRUCK
STOP, AND ATTORNEY .JOHNSTON BELIEVED THAT THEY DO, BUT NOTED THAT
THE SALE OF GASOLINE AT CONVENIENCE STORES IS USED AS A "LOSS LEADER"
TYPE OF THING.
COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT ROUTE 60 HAS A 75' SET-
BACK IN THAT AREA AND ASKED IF THAT WOULD GIVE THEM ENOUGH ROOM.
ATTORNEY JOHNSTON STATED THAT IT WOULD.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THE 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS
INCLUDED IN THE 75' SETBACK, AND ATTORNEY JOHNSTON FELT THE ORDINANCE
3
STATES THAT THE SETBACK IS FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ROUTE 60.
ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
THERE WERE NONE.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THE LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
CALLS FOR REZONING THE ENTIRE PARCEL TO C -IA WHILE THE RECOMMENDATION
42
MAR 51900 tom -- . *t " -
Y
MAR 51900 42 *E851,.
OF THE ZONING BOARD WAS TO APPROVE C-lA FOR A SMALL SECTION IN THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL AND CHANGE THE REMAINDER TO B-1. HE
ASKED IF WE CAN CONSIDER CHANGING DIFFERENT PORTIONS AS LONG AS WE
DOWNGRADE THE ZONING.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HE PERSONALLY WOULD PREFER TO SEE
IT READVERTISED, BUT FELT IT IS A LESSER USE AND WITH A STIPULATION
FROM THE APPLICANT, HE BELIEVED THE BOARD COULD MOVE AHEAD.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE
80-9 AUTHORIZING A CHANGE IN ZONING TO C -IA FOR THE 150 X 250 PIECE
IN THE NORTHWEST SECTION OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL; THE REMAINDER TO
STAY IN R-3.
MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, TO DENY THE REZONING REQUEST ON THE BASIS THAT THERE
ALREADY IS SUFFICIENT B-1 ZONING IN THE AREA AND BECAUSE IT WOULD
BE, IN EFFECT, SPOT ZONING.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT HERE WE HAVE A SINGLE
PROPERTY OWNER WHO HAS TEN ACRES, AND ALTHOUGH THIS INTERSECTION DOES
NOT YET BEAR THE SAME TRAFFIC AS 510 AND 512, HE FELT THERE IS A
NEED AND THAT YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE THE COMMERCIAL ZONING ON ONE SIDE
OF THE ROAD AND DENY IT ON THE OTHER SIDE. HE BELIEVED BY ZONING
THIS IN A WAY THAT CREATES A BUFFER, WE CAN PROPERLY CONTROL THAT
AREA. COMMISSIONER WODTKE DID NOT SEE ANY PARTICULAR NEED FOR THE
APPLICANT TO GO TO THE B-1, AND FELT IF THERE IS SUCH A NEED IN THE
FUTURE, IT COULD BE ADDRESSED AT THAT TIME. HE FURTHER FELT THAT WITH
TODAY IS ECONOMY, THERE IS A NEED FOR CONVENIENCE STORES SINCE THEIR
SELF-SERVICE GAS PUMPS ARE ABOUT THE LEAST EXPENSIVE BECAUSE THEY
CAN TAKE THE PROFITS IN THE STORE AND NOT SO MUCH ON THE GAS.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT WAS OF THE OPINION THAT GAS IS MORE
EXPENSIVE IN CONVENIENCE STORES AND STATED THAT HE FELT DIFFERENTLY
FROM -EVERYONE BECAUSE WHILE HE AGREED THERE MAY BE A NEED FOR A
CONVENIENCE STORE, HE DID NOT FEEL A GAS STATION WAS NEEDED, AND HE
DID NOT FEEL YOU WOULD WANT B-1 ON THAT INTERSECTION.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE INTENT OF COMMISSIONER LYONS'
POTION, AND HE STATED THAT IT WAS MEANT TO DENY THE REZONING
RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD OR TO DENY ANY CHANGE IN
ZONING.
COMMISSIONER LOY FELT THE ZONING BOARD HAD DONE A GOOD JOB
AND STATED THAT SHE LIKED THE B-1 ON THE ROAD A LOT BETTER THAN THE
R-3.
ATTORNEY .JOHNSTON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS CLIENT HAD
ACQUIESCED WITH -THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE C -1A AND
THE B-1 AND FURTHER NOTED THAT THE PLANNING BOARD'S ATTORNEY STATED
THEY COULD CHANGE THE REQUEST BECAUSE IT WAS A HIGHER ZONING AND
DID NOT DOWNGRADE FROM THE NOTICE.
THE -CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON
WITH COMMISSIONERS LYONS AND DEESON VOTING IN FAVOR; COMMISSIONERS
Loy, WODTKE, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN OPPOSITION. THE MOTION
FAILED.
POTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 80-9 GRANTING A REZONING TO C-lA FOR THE
150' X 250' AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE PROPERTY ADVERTISED, THE
REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY TO BE GIVEN A B-1 CLASSIFICATION.
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THAT WE ARE GETTING BACK INTO THE
BUSINESS OF LITTLE DRIBS AND DRABS OF REZONING AND THAT WE SHOULD LOOK
AT THE WHOLE AREA IN ORDER TO HAVE A TOTALLY ARTICULATED PICTURE.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE LOOKS AT IT A LITTLE
DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE WE WILL HAVE MANY RESIDENTIAL PEOPLE IN AN AREA
THAT IS SEVEN TO EIGHT MILES FROM TOWN. HE BELIEVED THESE PEOPLE
ARE ENTITLED TO HAVE FACILITIES AVAILABLE AND THAT WE HAVE TO ADDRESS
THIS PROBLEM AS THE AREA DEVELOPS AND THE NEEDS ARISE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS ALL KINDS OF
B-1 NEARBY, AND THAT THERE ALREADY IS A GAS PUMP ACROSS THE STREET
AND A SMALL CAFE. HE STATED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH
DEVELOPING THAT CORNER, BUT FELT IT SHOULD BE PART OF AN INTEGRATED
APPROACH.
44
MAR 51980 .4z, t;
kA
MAR 51980 mox 42 'ACE853
COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT POSSIBLY THE EXISTING B-1
HAS NOT DEVELOPED BECAUSE IT ISN IT IN THE RIGHT LOCATION. HE FELT
THE ACCESSIBILITY IS THE PROBLEM.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR A CONVENI-
ENCE STORE TO SUPPORT THE FACILITIES OF THE NEW PROJECT, BUT REITERATED
THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THERE IS A NEED FOR A GAS STATION SINCE THERE IS
GAS AVAILABLE RIGHT ACROSS THE HIGHWAY; HE CONTINUED THAT HE, THERE-
FORE, WOULD LIKE TO SEE B-1 AND NO C-lA, 5
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONERS
LAY, WODTKE AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN FAVOR; COMMISSIONERS DEESON
AND LYONS VOTED IN OPPOSITION, AND THE MOTION TO ADOPT ORDINANCE
80-9 GRANTING A REZONING TO C-lA AND B-1 CARRIED.
MARI"980 45 _
ORDINANCE NO. 80-9
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, did publish and send. its Notice of Intent
to rezone the hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto
held a public hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian
River County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended
as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the
following described property situated in Indian
River County, Florida, to -wit:
The West 150' of the North 250' of the West 10.82
acres of Tract 12, Section 1, Township 33 South,
Range 38 East, exclusive of rights-of-way, Indian
River Farms Co. Subd., Plat Book 2, Page 25, OR
Book 99, Page 21
Be changed from R-3 Multiple Family District to
C-lA Commercial District, and
The North 660' of the West 10.82 acres of Tract 121
Section 1, Township 33 South, Ranae 38 East, exclusive
of rights-of-way, Indian River Farms Co. Subd.,
Plat Book 2, Page 25, OR Book 99, Page 21, less the
West 150' of the North 250' of said described property
Be changed from R-3 Multiple Family District to B-1
Planned Business District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and
described in said Zoning Regulations.
This Ordinance shall take effect March 10, 1980.
3
M 2 , 4
AR 51980
MAR 51980 max 42 FrUF 855.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT BUILDING DIRECTOR ESTER
RYMER WOULD NOW REVIEW THE FOLLOWING LIST OF PENDING CONDEMNATIONS
ON HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES:
47
MA1980 � �
- DEPARTMENT ORRESPOE E =
DATE _ January 7. 1980
To Mr. Joe Collins _ DEPOT County _Attorney
FROM Ester L. Rymer DEPT Building Director
SUBJECT Condemnations for Indian River County
Following is a listing of the pending condemnations to date, for which
I would appreciate your assistance and legal handling, for presentation
to the County Board of Commissioners.
1) Viola Young; (deceased): We are told this is being handled by
ttny. Erickson.
2) Everett J. Gill <deceased): Copy sent to Dale Grabenbauer,-
542 Fleming St., Sebastian, Fla.(Permit taken out -not removed)
3) Delwyn D. Danko: 3792 S.W. 16th Place, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.
4) Noble Lee Jackson (et al): Trustees of the Church of God in Christ
Temple, 4875 - 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, Fla.(Permit taken -not removed)
5) Dr. Charles A. Fenner: P.O. Box 323, Wabasso, Fla. 32970
6) Fannie Ruth Wade Stinson: 1100 Mill Street, Melbourne, Fla. 32901
7) Angelo P. Garetto: 23706 S. Western, Blue Island, 111. 60406
8) Lucille West: 4311 - 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, Fla.
9) Helen McConico Jackson: c/o Anne Lou Ferguson, P.O. Box 1841, Vero
10) S & R Land Com an : Route #2, 920 North A -I -A, Vero Beach (No notice
necessary. I have an affidavit from the owner authorizing Indian
River County to remove this structure and bill them for expenses.)
11) Homeowner's Corp.: P.O. Box 27, Rockledge, Fla. 32955
12) Charles Brown: 4625 - 40 Ave., Vero Beach (Letter came back unclaimed)
13) E. Griffith & Catherine Hall: 6155 - 7th Place, Vero Beach.
14) C. A. Lightsey: Route 1, Box 211, -Monticello, Fla. 32344
15) Altheris Sharpton: P.O. Box 12, Wabasso (Notice ret'd. unclaimed)
16) Laila W. Jackson & Gertrude W. Schockliford: P.O. Box 113, Wabasso
Sent in both names-ret'd. markeU Jac son eceased; resent in just
Schockliford-notice ret'd. as unclaimed.)
17) Sam. & Lottie Williams: Route 1, Box 763, Cocoa, Fla. 32922
18) James White: Box 553, Wabasso, Fla.
19) Carol Smith: 4439 - 35th Ave (Lot 4, Blk 2, N. Gifford Heights)
Demo .IlPerm t taken -still not removed.
20) Rev. Willie Jones: 2110 - 41st St. (Corner S. Gifford Rd & U.S. #1)
st Demol. Permit taken 4-17-77; reissued again on 11-17-78; still
not removed.
21) Earlie B. Evans: 2380 - 41st St (Lot 7, Jackson's SID) Demol Permit
taken 7-10-/9; not removed.
22) Robt. W. & Pearlie W. Erickson: 1349 Berea Place, Pacific Palisades,
a i noria90272
23) Zettie Ealy: Box 461, Wabasso, Fla.
The following structures have been removed but the debris is still existing:
F
1) W. E. Orth (el al): P.O. Box 772, Vero Beach
2) Edward Strnad: Connecticut Trailer Park structure
3) Ms. Minnie Ross: P.O. Box 386, Wabasso, Fla.
4.
MAR 51980°
42 856
J
MAR 51990 42 f 857
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ON ITEM
1, VIOLA YOUNG, BOTH THE PROPERTY OWNER AND HER ATTORNEY ARE DECEASED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SEND
NOTICE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER WHO APPEARS ON THE TAX ROLL, AND THIS
HAS BEEN DONE, THOUGH HIS NOTICE WAS NOT ACKNOWLEDGED. MRS. RYMER
STATED THAT SHE HAS A RETURN RECEIPT SIGNED BY THE GRANDDAUGHTER.
MRS. RYMER THEN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS IS A DILAPIDATED
STRUCTURE WHICH NEEDS TO BE TAKEN DOWN. THE HOUSE IS NOT OCCUPIED
AND HAS NO ELECTRICITY. SHE SUBMITTED A PICTURE OF THE STRUCTURE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATOR TO
HAVE COUNTY CREWS REMOVE SAID STRUCTURE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED
THAT THE OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATOR BID THE JOB
OUT AND THEN FILE A LIEN, BUT HISTORICALLY, WE HAVE FOUND THAT THE
COUNTY CAN DO THIS WORK CHEAPER.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY VIOLA YOUNG, DECEASED, (26-32-29-
00005-0060-00003.0) LOT 3, BLOCK 6, SPRUCE PARK SUBDIVISION, ARE
HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND
HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT
THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE
DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED
AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID
BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NEXT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ITEM
2, OWNED BY EVERETT J. GILL, DECEASED, HAS BEEN PURCHASED BY DALE
GRABENAUER, AND MR. GRABENAUER DID COME IN AND OBTAIN A DEMOLITION
PERMIT IN NOVEMBER OF 1979. THE DEMOLITION HAS NOT TAKEN PLACE,
HOWEVER, AND SHE HAS NO INDICATION WHEN IT WILL BE.
DALE GRABENAUER APPEARED AND EXPLAINED THAT HE PURCHASED
THIS PROPERTY FROM MR. GILL IN A LIFE ESTATE. MR. GILL HAS SINCE
DIED, BUT THE PROPERTY IS STILL RECORDED IN MR. GILLS NAME. MR.
GRABENAUER STATED THAT HE HAS AN ATTORNEY WORKING ON THIS, AND HE
DID NOT WANT TO GO AHEAD UNTIL THE PROPERTY WAS IN HIS NAME.
MAR X900 49 = �
ATTORNEY COLLINS QUESTIONED WHAT MR. GRABENAUER MEANT BY
A It LIFE ESTATE,°° AND MR. GRABENAUER EXPLAINED THAT HIS CONTRACT
WITH MR. GILL GAVE HIM THE RIGHT TO LIVE ON THE PROPERTY FOR THE
REST OF HIS LIFE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT IF MR. GRABENAUER HAS A WARRANTY
DEED, AND IT -WAS SIGNED PRIOR TO MR. GILL°S DEATH, THEN TITLE IS IN
MR. GRABENAUER°S NAME.
MR. GRABENAUER STATED THAT HE DOES HAVE A WARRANTY DEED.
HE NOTED THAT WHEN HE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY FOUR YEARS AGO, YOU COULDN'T
GET ON THE PROPERTY WITH A TANK, AND HE HAS BEEN WORKING ON IT,
HAULING LOADS OF JUNK TO THE DUMP, AND WAS NOT AWARE OF ANY SPECIFIC
DATE WHEN HE WAS SUPPOSED TO TEAR IT DOWN.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF 90 DAYS WOULD BE A REASONABLE
PERIOD TO ASK THAT`THIS WILL BE TORN DOWN.
MR. GRABENAUER FELT THAT WOULD BE FAIR. HE ASKED IF THE
CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT WOULD BURN THIS DOWN, AND COMMISSIONER LOY FELT
HE WOULD BE BETTER OFF IF IT WERE REMOVED BY THE COUNTY.
MR. GRABENAUER STATED THAT HE DID NOT KNOW WHAT THE COUNTY
WOULD CHARGE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE CHARGE IS THE
DIRECT COST OF THE COUNTY TO TEAR IT DOWN; THERE IS NO PROFIT FACTOR.
HE DID NOT BELIEVE ANYONE COULD CONTRACT TO DO IT FOR LESS.
MR. GRABENAUER CONTINUED THAT THIS PLACE HAS LOOKED LIKE
A DUMP FOR YEARS, AND NOW THAT HE HAS COME IN AND MORE OR LESS BEAUTI-
FIED IT, SUDDENLY THE PRESSURE IS BEING PUT ON HIM TO REMOVE IT.
IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE BOARD IS MAKING A CONCERTED
EFFORT TO GET THESE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES REMOVED.
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY DALE GRABENAUER, PREVIOUSLY OWNED
BY EVERETT J. GILL, DECEASED, LOCATED AT 1095 27TH AVENUE (INDIAN
RIVER FARMS CO. SUB. PBS 2-25 S 1 ACRE OF S 5 ACRES OF E 10 ACRES OF
TRACT 1, OR BK. 486, PP 765) ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND
ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN
0
50
42
MAR 51980 '"`
MAR 51900 eo% 42 fso859
RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A
NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS FROM TODAY BY
DALE GRABENAUER, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL THEREAFTER BE REMOVED
AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR UNLESS OWNER CONSENTS
TO A LESSER PERIOD, AND A LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY
IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
ON ITEM 3, PROPERTY OWNED BY DELWYN DANKO, LOCATED AT 1700
IST ST. S.W., BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED THAT SHE NEVER HAS HAD
ANY CONTACT WITH THE OWNERS DIRECTLY, BUT HAS RECEIVED A LOT OF
COMPLAINTS FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SEVERAL NOTICES HAVE BEEN SENT
AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE DID GET A RETURN RECEIPT WHEN THE
NOTICE WAS SENT IN CARE OF RICHARD WELCH, 4164 S.W. 22ND ST., FORT
LAUDERDALE. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID NOT GET A RETURN ON
HIS NOTICE, BUT THAT THE BOARD COULD PROCEED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS:LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY DELWYN D. DANKO, LOCATED AT 1700 1ST ST. S.W.,
LOT 4, BLOCK F, THE MORELAND SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE
HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE
DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN
THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER PRESENTED PICTURES OF ITEM 4 AND
STATED THAT NOBLE -LEE JACKSON ET AL, HAD BEEN SENT NOTICES AS TRUSTEES
FOR THE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST TEMPLE. MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE
DID RECEIVE A RETURN RECEIPT; ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID NOT,
BUT THE BURDEN IS TO SEND THE NOTICE TO THE ADDRESS ON THE TAX ROLL.
PARS. RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SHE DID.ISSUE A DEMOLI-
TION PERMIT IN 1978, BUT THEY HAVE NEVER GONE AHEAD WITH IT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE_PROPERTY OWNED BY NOBLE LEE JACKSON, ET AL, TRUSTEES OF THE
51
MA=1980
CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST TEMPLE, LOCATED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 16, HILLCREST
SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING
A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND
BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE
APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS
OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT REPORTED ON THE PROPERTY IN ITEM 5
OWNED BY DR. CHARLES A. FENNER, BEING THE HIGHLANDS MOTEL AND POOL
ON NORTH U.S. 1. HE STATED THAT NOTICES HAVE BEEN SENT, AND THEY
HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE COUNTY PREVIOUSLY
WAS INVOLVED IN SOME LITIGATION WITH DR, FENNER IN 1975, AT WHICH
TIME HE WAS TRYING TO ADD IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY 'WITHOUT A
BUILDING PERMIT. HE STATED THAT WE ENJOINED HIM FROM CONTINUING
WITHOUT A PERMIT AND HAD THE STRUCTURE DECLARED HAZARDOUS AND GAVE
HIM 90 DAYS TO EITHER FIX IT UP OR TEAR IT DOWN, AND THE COURT DID
ENTER AN ORDER REQUIRING THAT IT BE TORN DOWN. THE ATTORNEY CONTINUED
THAT WE HAVE TWO AVENUES OF APPROACH - HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES AND
CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR FAILURE TO TEAR THE BUILDING DOWN AS REQUIRED.
DR. FENNER CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT HE HADN'T
RECEIVED ANY CORRESPONDENCE WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROBLEM, AND THEY
WERE IN THE PROCESS ABOUT THE 5TH OF FEBRUARY OF CLEANING UP THE
HURRICANE DAMAGE WHEN A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
BROUGHT TO HIS CONTRACTOR S ATTENTION THAT THERE WAS SOME CORRESPONDENCE
HE HAD NOT RECEIVED.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED DR. FENNER IF HE WAS AWARE OF THE
COURT ORDER, AND DR. FENNER STATED HE DID NOT KNOW OF THIS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT DR. FENNER WAS
PRESENT AT THE COURT AND DID RECEIVE A NOTICE, AND DR. FENNER STATED
THAT IF HE WAS REFERRING TO 1975, HE WAS AWARE OF THAT.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF HE REMEMBERED BEING GIVEN 90 DAYS
BY THE COURT TO REMOVE THE STRUCTURE.
52
MAR 51980acF
MAR 51980 Booz 42 f$61
DR. FENNER,CONTENDED THAT THE COURT ORDER SPECIFIED THAT
THE BUILDINGS WERE SOUND AND THAT THE ONLY STRUCTURES REQUIRED TO
BE REMOVED WERE 5 FREE STANDING MASONRY WALLS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT AGREE AND READ FROM THE COURT ORDER
WHICH ENJOINED DR. FENNER FROM ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A BUILDING
PERMIT WAS OBTAINED AND REQUIRED THAT WITHIN 60 DAYS HE "TAKE WHATEVER
ACTION IS NECESSARY TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE BUILDING DIRECTOR THAT.THE
CONSTRUCTION ON HIS PROPERTY MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOUTHERN
STANDARD BUILDING CODE...." HE STATED THAT THE ONLY ISSUE THE COURT
ADDRESSED WAS BUILDING WITHOUT A PERMIT.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE FELT THE BOARD HAS BEEN
EXTREMELY LENIENT WITH DR. FENNER ALL THESE YEARS.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED DR. FENNER IF HE FELT THE BUILDING
IS HAZARDOUS, AND DR. FENNER STATED THAT HE DID NOT AND THAT HE HAS
CONSULTED PROFESSIONALS WHO CONCUR WITH HIM.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER DEESON, TO DETERMINE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE
PROPERTY OWNED BY DR. CHARLES A. FENNER (17-31-39-00000-3000-00014.0)
THE HIGHLAND MOTEL (STRUCTURE & POOL), ARE DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS
AND PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY AND TO MOVE THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES BE DECLARED A
NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM TODAY (MARCH 15,
1980), BY DR. CHARLES A. FENNER, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES SHALL
THEREAFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AND A LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF
REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT DR. FENNER IS REPRESENTING
TO THE BOARD THAT THE STRUCTURE IS IN COMPLIANCE AND THAT HE HAS
PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE WHO WILL STATE IT IS IN COMPLIANCE AND HE PROBABLY
SHOULD BE GIVEN A CHANCE TO PRESENT THAT EVIDENCE TO THE COMMISSION
PRIOR TO ANY FINAL ACTION.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED WHAT THE BUILDING DIRECTOR HAS TO
SAY ABOUT THE STRUCTURES.
53
Mft51980
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE NOTICES
SENT TO DR. FENNER CAME BACK UNCLAIMED. SHE CONTINUED THAT DR.
FENNER AND AN ARCHITECT VISITED HER LAST WEEK, AND THE ARCHITECT FIRST
CALLED HER AND SAID HIS FIRST RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE FOR DR. FENNER
TO REMOVE THE BUILDINGS AND START FROM SCRATCH; THEY THEN CAME IN AND
TALKED ABOUT•USING THESE BUILDINGS AS OFFICES INSTEAD OF A MOTEL.
MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE ADVISED THEM TO CONTACT A STRUCTURAL
ENGINEER TO DETERMINE WHAT THEY CAN SALVAGE, AND SHE ASKED FOR
DEFINITE INFORMATION THAT A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS HAS BEEN DONE. MRS.
RYMER FELT IF PROFESSIONAL MEN HAVE DONE THIS, THEY WOULD HAVE PUT IT
IN WRITING. SHE REITERATED THAT SHE TOLD DR. FENNER AND HIS ARCHITECT
EXACTLY WHAT HAD TO BE DONE, AND SHE HAS NOT SEEN OR HEARD FROM THEM
SINCE. MRS. RYMER REPORTED THAT SHE DID SEND AN INSPECTOR UP TO THE
MOTEL TO PUT A STOP WORK ORDER ON THE JOB BECAUSE THEY WERE REROOFING
SOME OF THE BUILDINGS, AND YOU CANNOT DO THIS ON CONDEMNED BUILDINGS
WITHOUT THE ELECTRICAL, ETC., BEING APPROVED FIRST. SHE CONTINUED THAT
THEY COMMENCED REROOFING AGAIN, AND SHE HAD TO STOP THEM AGAIN. MRS.
RYMER STATED THAT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IS MAINTAINING THAT NOT
ONLY THE STRUCTURAL PART OF THE BUILDING.IS NOT ACCORDING TO CODE,
BUT THAT THE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL HAVE -TO BE BROUGHT UP TO CODE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INQUIRED IF DR. FENNER DOES NEED A PERMIT
FOR ROOFING, AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT HE DOES AND ONE WAS NOT
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CALLED DR. FENNER BACK AND NOTED THAT HE
HAS NOT BEEN COOPERATIVE UP TO THIS DATE, AND DR. FENNER INQUIRED
WHAT THE BOARD WISHED HIM TO DO.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT HE COULD PICK UP HIS
MAIL FOR A START.
DR. FENNER STATED THAT IF THE BOARD AND THE BUILDING DEPART-
MENT FEELS HIS BUILDINGS ARE SUB -STANDARD, HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THIS
QUALIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL STRESS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SO THAT HE
CAN EITHER REFUTE OR NOT REFUTE THIS CLAIM. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
HE HAS BEEN TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT WITH A BREAKDOWN ON THE
54
MAR 51980 � 42'86
MAR 51990
42 -f-0-4863
INDIVIDUAL REPAIRS AND OUTLINED THESE VERY CAREFULLY AFTER TALKING
TO HIS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND TWO CONTRACTORS. HE STATED THAT HIS
BUILDING PERMITS WERE DENIED AND HIS ROOFER TOLD HIM THAT PERMITS
WERE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE REPAIR OF HURRICANE DAMAGE, AND THAT IS
ALL THEY ARE CURRENTLY DOING. HE ONCE AGAIN STATED THAT HE COMPLIED
WITH THE 1975 COURT ORDER 100% AND REMOVED THE FREE STANDING CONCRETE
WALLS, WHICH WAS ALL THAT WAS REQUIRED.
COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED HIM HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN SINCE
SOMEONE HAS LIVED IN THE MOTEL OR HOW LONG IT HAS BEEN SINCE ANYONE
RENTED FROM HIM.
DR. FENNER STATED THAT HE LIVES THERE RIGHT NOW, BUT THE -
PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN LEASED SINCE LAST SEPTEMBER. HE CONTINUED THAT
HE FELT THEY WERE STOPPED FROM REMOVING WHAT HE CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS
DAMAGE TO THE BUILDINGS. HE NOTED THE SECOND STORY WAS COMPLETELY
DESTROYED AND THEY REMOVED IT; PORCHES THAT WERE DESTROYED WERE
REMOVED, AND REPAIRS TO THE ROOFS OF BUILDINGS 1 AND Z WERE STARTED
WITHOUT A PERMIT BECAUSE HE WAS TOLD THIS WAS NOT REQUIRED TO REPAIR
HURRICANE DAMAGE. HE CONTINUED THAT WHEN HE HEARD ABOUT THE PERMIT
HE CALLED HIS LAWYER, WHO WENT TO SEE ZONING DIRECTOR WALKER, AT
WHICH TIME THEY WERE INFORMED THE PROPERTY WAS CONDEMNED AND WERE GIVEN
COPIES OF CORRESPONDENCE THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE RECEIVED.
DR. FENNER CLAIMED THAT THE LETTER IN REGARD TO CONDEMNATION WAS
WRITTEN TO THE ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT, NOT TO HIS NAME, AND THE
ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT PASSED ON THE INFORMATION THAT THE PROPERTY
WAS CONDEMNED. HE STATED THAT THIS IS THE FIRST TIME HE HAS BEEN
ASKED ANYTHING ABOUT THE PROPERTY.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE POOL
IS NOT BEING USED; RAIN COLLECTS IN IT AND CREATES AN UNSANITARY
CONDITION, AND ONCE THE STRUCTURES ARE REMOVED, IT WOULD BE JUST AN
OPEN POOL ON AN EMPTY LOT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HIS MOTION IS INTENDED TO
INCLUDE ALL ITEMS VERIFIED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AS HAZARDOUS.
55
MPS 1980
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON
AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED TO DR. FENNER ABOUT THE
PROCESS FOR REMOVAL OF THE STRUCTURES AND PLACING OF A LIEN. THE
ADMINISTRATOR ASKED IF IT IS THE INTENT, IF THE POOL IS REMOVED,
THAT IT SHOULD BE FILLED IN, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT YOU
CANNOT LEAVE A HOLE THERE,
THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED HE WILL NOTIFY DR: FENNER, WHO
HAS NO TELEPHONE, BEFORE THE COUNTY COMMENCES REMOVAL OF THE STRUCTURES.
DR. FENNER ASKED IF THERE IS ANY APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION,
AND THE BOARD INFORMED HIM THAT HE CAN APPEAL TO THE COURTS.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED THAT NO ONE WAS PRESENT TO
REPRESENT FANNIE RUTH WADE STINSON, ITEM 61 AND INFORMED THE BOARD
THAT NOTIFICATION HAS BEEN SENT AND RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
VIODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS
LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY FANNIE RUTH WADE STINSON (29-31-39-
00000-5000-0008,0) LOT 8 - 209 FT. X 209 FT. IN NW COR. OF N 1/2 OF
NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 of SCJ 1/4 LESS BROCK & 560 FT. OF N 120 FT. OF W
125 FT. LESS l; 25 FT. FOR RD. R/W, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS
AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED
A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE
COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT ANGELO GARETTO, ITEM
7, HAS CALLED SEVERAL TIMES FROM ILLINOIS. HE APPARENTLY HAD SOME
AGREEMENT ABOUT WITHHOLDING MONTHLY RENTAL TO BRING THE HOUSE UP TO
CODE, AND HE WILL BE DOWN BY MARCH 11TH, BUT HAD A DEATH IN THE
FAMILY AND COULD NOT BE PRESENT TODAY. SHE REQUESTED THAT THIS ITEM
BE DELAYED TO GIVE HER TIME TO WORK WITH THE OWNER.
COMMISSIONER LYONS REQUESTED THAT MRS. RYMER REPORT BACK
ON THIS MATTER IN A MONTH S TIME.
56
MAR 5190 , � xoq
Mai 5 1980 K '42 `nof865
ON ITEM S, LUCILLE WEST, BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED
THAT NOTICE WAS SENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED. ATTORNEY COLLINS SENT NOTICE
BUT RECEIVED NO ANSWER. MRS. RYMER NOTED THAT THERE HAD BEEN AN
ARTICLE IN THE NEWSPAPER SOMETIME AGO REPORTING THAT THE HOME OF
LUCILLE WEST HAD BEEN DESTROYED BY A FLASH FIRE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF SHE WOULD LIKE TO ALLOW THEM MORE
TIME ON ACCOUNT OF THE FIRE, AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE HAS NOT
HEARD FROM THEM SINCE THE FIRE WHICH WAS LAST SEPTEMBER.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT FEEL THE FIRE HAD MUCH AFFECT ON
THIS SINCE THE PROPERTY WAS -CONDEMNED PRIOR TO THE FIRE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY LUCILLE WEST (27-32-39-0004-0040-0011.0)
LOT 11, BLOCK 4, NORTH GIFFORD HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED
TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE
CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER.COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE
BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN
THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURE OWNED BY HELEN MCCONICO .JACKSON, ITEM 9, HAS BEEN PROPERLY
REMOVED SINCE NOTICE.
MRS. RYMER STATED THAT SHE HAS RECEIVED AN AFFIDAVIT FROM
S & R LAND COMPANY, ITEM 10, AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY TO REMOVE THE
HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THEIR PROPERTY AND BILL THEM FOR THE
EXPENSE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY S & R LAND COMPANY, (12-33-39-0000-5000-
0012.0) 1030 OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS
AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED
57
MM51980 `- _.-
A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE*EVENT THE
COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT NOTICE WAS SENT TO
HOMEOWNER'S CORPORATION, ITEM 11, AND RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGED. SHE
CONTINUED THAT SHE HAD A REPORT FROM THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE IS OPEN ON ONE SIDE AND SUBJECT TO VANDALISM.
SHE STATED THAT SHE GAVE THE OWNER THE RIGHT TO EITHER FIX IT UP OR
TEAR IT DOWN, BUT HAS HAD NO RESPONSE. SHE CONTINUED THAT THE HURRICANE
TOOK THE ROOF OFF, AND IT IS NOW OUT IN THE YARD.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY HOMEOWNER'S CORPORATION (17-32-39-02-0030-
00039,0) .JOHN D. STONOM RESIDENCE, LOTS 29--32, BLOCK 3, KINGS MUSIC
LAND SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRE-
SENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE
AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE
APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS
OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER,
MRS. RYMER STATED THAT NOTICES SENT TO CHARLES BROWN, ITEM
12, WERE RETURNED UNCLAIMED. SHE SUBMITTED PICTURES.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE TAXES WERE PAID BY THE
ADAIR MORTGAGE CO., OF MACON, GEORGIA, WHICH INDICATES THEY HAVE
EITHER FORECLOSED ON THE PROPERTY OR SOMEONE IS MAKING MORTGAGE PAY-
MENTS. HE STATED THAT THE FILE REFLECTS THAT THREE DIFFERENT NOTICES
HAVE BEEN SENT ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY CHARLES BROWN (22-31-39-00-5000-025.0) 4625
40TH AVENUE, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING
A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND
MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE
58
MAR 51980 4
L
max 42 pAu 867
REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE
LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE
NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT NOTICES WERE SENT TO
E. GRIFFITH AND CATHERINE C. HALL, ITEM 13. BUT NOT ACKNOWLEDGED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY E. GRIFFITH & CATHERINE C. HALL (17-33-39-
00005-0004-00006.0) LOTS 6 & 7, BLOCK D, PINE TREE PARK, UNIT #4,
ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND
HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT
THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE
DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED
AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID
BY THE OWNER.
NO REPRESENTATIVE WAS PRESENT FOR C. A. LIGHTSEY, ITEM 14,
AND MRS. RYMER STATED THAT NOTICES WERE SENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE RECEIVED A LETTER IN RESPONSE
TO HIS NOTICE. MR. LIGHTSEY IS DECEASED, AND HIS HEIRS WOULD APPRECI-
ATE TIME TO CLOSE OUT THE SALE.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NOTED THAT THIS ALL STARTED WAY BACK
WHEN MR. LIGHTSEY WAS SICK, AND IT WAS DELAYED BECAUSE OF HIS ILLNESS.
SHE STATED THAT, IN HER OPINION, THIS STRUCTURE COULD NOT BE BROUGHT
UP TO CODE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY C. A. LIGHTSEY, DECEASED (10-32-39-0000-1000-
00004.0) ON NORTH WINTER BEACH ROAD, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS
AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED
A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE
COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
59
M�i 1980
ITEM 15 CONCERNED PROPERTY OWNED BY ALTHERIS SHARPTON.
MR. SHARPTON WAS PRESENT REPRESENTING HIS .96 YEAR OLD MOTHER WHO
OWNS THIS PROPERTY. HE STATED THAT BECAUSE OF HER AGE SHE SIGNED
A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO HIM FOR THE PROPERTY, BUT HE WAS IN CALIFORNIA
AND IS NOW WORKING AT THE CAPE AND LIVING NEAR THE BASE, AND JUST
RECEIVED NOTICE. MR. SHARPTON STATED THAT HE NOTICED THE CONDITION
OF THE PROPERTY HIMSELF AND PUT IN FOR A LOAN BECAUSE THE HURRICANE
DID QUITE A BIT OF DAMAGE. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS RECEIVED AN
APPROVED LOAN AND IS GOING TO DO WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO RECTIFY
THE SITUATION. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS COUSIN LIVES ON THE
PROPERTY NOW, AND THERE IS A HOUSE AND TWO TRAILERS ON THE PROPERTY.
MRS. RYMER AGREED THERE IS MORE THAN ONE STRUCTURE, AND
STATED THAT THE NOTICE REFERS TO THE ONE THAT IS EMPTY. SHE SHOWED
MR. SHARPTON A PICTURE OF THE BUILDING THE COUNTY WISHES TO HAVE TAKEN
DOWN, AND STATED THAT SHE WOULD HAVE A STAFF MEMBER PERSONALLY
IDENTIFY THE BUILDING FOR MR. SHARPTON.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED MR. SHARPTON IF HE WISHED THAT
PARTICULAR BUILDING TO BE REMOVED BY THE COUNTY, AND MR, SHARPTON
STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE 90 DAYS TO REMOVE IT HIMSELF.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE EMPTY IMPROVEMENTS
IDENTIFIED BY THE BUILDING DIRECTOR LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY
ALTHERIS SHARPTON, (29-31-39-00000-5000-000230.0) ARE HEREBY DECLARED
TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO
THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS
STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN NINETY
(90) DAYS FROM TODAY BY PAIR. SHARPTON, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL
THEREAFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AND A LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS
OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO ITEM 16, LAILA W. JACKSON
AND GERTRUDE W. SCHOCKLIFORD. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID
MAR 51980 K��
MAR
51990
Box
�42AF�s`'86,9
NOT
HAVE A RETURN RECEIPT.
HE DID CHECK THE RECORDS AND
COULD NOT
FIND OWNERSHIP IN EITHER JACKSON OR SCHOCKLIFORD AND WOULD HAVE TO
CONCLUDE WE DID NOT EFFECT PROPER NOTICE.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER STATED THAT AFTER SOME RESEARCH,
SHE HAD LOCATED NEW OWNERS IRWIN AND MILLIE CARTWRIGHT. IT WAS
AGREED THIS ITEM SHOULD BE HELD OVER.
ITEM 17, SAM AND LOTTIE WILLIAMS, - MRS. RYMER REPORTED
THAT NOTICES WERE SENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED. NO REPRESENTATIVE WAS PRESENT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY SAM & LOTTIE WILLIAMS, (22-32-39-00000-
5000-00086.0) 36TH AVENUE NORTH OF 45TH STREET, ARE HEREBY DECLARED
TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE
CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE
BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY
,ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN
THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED IN REGARD TO ITEM 18,
JAMES WHITE, WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE
AND WEST WABASSO ROAD, THAT SHE DOES NOT HAVE A PHOTOGRAPH, BUT SHE
SENT AN INSPECTOR UP THERE, AND THE HOUSE IS OVER 50% DETERIORATED
AND IS SLIPPING OFF ITS PIERS. IT HAS NO PLUMBING; THE ELECTRIC IS
UNSAFE; AND THE WALL COVERINGS ARE BROKEN. SHE DID NOT BELIEVE ANY-
ONE WAS LIVING THERE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY JAMES WHITE (32-31-39-00002-0020-00008.0)
LOTS 8 & 9, BLOCK 2, HILLSIDE SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO
BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE
CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE
BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND PROVIDED NO ONE IS LIVING IN THE STRUCTURE,
THAT IT BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND
THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE
COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
MAlmiisao _ _ 617 _ �
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT CAROLYN
SMITH, ITEM 19, TOOK OUT'A DEMOLITION PERMIT IN DECEMBER of 1979,
BUT THE STRUCTURE HAS NOT BEEN TORN DOWN YET. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED
THAT HE HAS A SIGNED RECEIPT OF NOTIFICATION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSl,ONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY CAROLYN SMITH, LOT 4, BLOCK 2, NORTH GIFFORD
HEIGHTS, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A
SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND
MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT
REMOVED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM TODAY BY CAROLYN SMITH, SAID
HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL THEREAFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF
THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND A LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY
IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NEXT DISCUSSED ITEM 20, REV. WILLIE
JONES, AND NOTED THAT A DEMOLITION PERMIT ON THIS WAS ISSUED TO THE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BACK IN 1978. SHE ASKED BUILDING
DIRECTOR WALKER IF THIS WAS NOT AN OLD SHOE REPAIR STORE.
MR. WALKER STATED THAT ONE BUILDING HAS BEEN CORRECTED,,
BUT THIS IS A NEW ONE. HE STATED THAT MR. .JONES HAS NOT REMOVED ALL
THE SHOE REPAIR MACHINERY, BUT IS WORKING ON IT NOW, AND HAS BEEN
STACKING UP THE LUMBER DURING THE LAST TWO WEEKS,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD RECEIVE A REPORT
ON THIS IN THIRTY DAYS.
IN REGARD TO ITEM 21, EARLIE B. EVANS, BUILDING DIRECTOR
RYMER STATED THAT SHE DID ISSUE A DEMOLITION PERMIT.
GEORGE YORK APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THIS
STRUCTURE IS TORN DOWN AND REMOVED, BUT HE IS REPAIRING THE GARAGE.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED THAT ON ITEM 22, ROBERT W.
AND PERLIE W. ERICKSON, NOTICES HAVE BEEN SENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY ROBERT W. AND PERLIE W. ERICKSON (-32-39-
02-0150-001.0) INDIAN RIVER FARMS CO. PBS 2-12 TRS. 15 & 16 IN S 1/2,
62
MAR 51980 - X870
o�c 2 871
LESS CANAL & PORTION AS IN BK. 351, ARE HEREBY DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS
AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BE DECLARED
A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE
COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
ITEM 23, ZETTIE EALY - BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER REPORTED
THAT AT ONE TIME THEY WERE TRYING TO GET SOME TENANTS OUT OF THERE.
H. D. ROGERS CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT HE IS
THE TENANT AND HAS MANY PROBLEMS, AND WOULD LIKE TIME TO GET OUT OF
THERE. HE ASKED HOW LONG THE BOARD COULD GIVE HIM.
AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, THE CHAIRMAN ASKED MR. ROGERS IF
FOUR MONTHS WOULD BE SUFFICIENT, AND HE STATED THAT WOULD BE SATIS-
FACTORY.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED
ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY ZETTIE EALY (32-31-39-00002-0020-0021.0)
LOTS 20 TO 24 INCL., BLOCK 2, HILLSIDE SUBDIVISION, ARE HEREBY DECLARED
TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE
CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE
BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN 120 DAYS FROM TODAY
(JULY 3, 1980) BY THE OWNER, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL THERE-
AFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND A
LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF
REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER NEXT BROUGHT UP A HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE
OWNED BY A. J. HARRIS, BUT ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAD NOT
SENT ANY NOTICES ON THIS AND DID NOT FEEL THE BOARD COULD ACT. HE
SUGGESTED THIS BE HELD OVER UNTIL THE SECOND MEETING IN APRIL.
DISCUSSION ENSUED ON PROPERTIES WHERE THE STRUCTURES HAVE
BEEN REMOVED, BUT THE DEBRIS STILL REMAINS, AS FOLLOWS:
1. W. E. ORTH ET AL
2. EDWARD STRNAD
3. MS. MINNIE ROSS
63 -
MAI�1980
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT NO SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL NOTICES_
WERE SENT OUT SINCE THESE WERE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED TO BE'TORN
DOWN. HE FELT THE ACTION TO BE TAKEN WOULD BE TO AUTHORIZE CLEANING
UP WHATEVER IS LEFT AND HE FELT THIS CAN BE DONE UNDER THE PREVIOUS
NOTICE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THERE SHOULD POSSIBLY BE
ADDITIONAL NOTICE AND ALLOW THIRTY DAYS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE FILE ON EDWARD STRNAD
SHOWS THAT HE WAS GOING TO HOLD $750 IN ESCROW FOR THIS PURPOSE, AND
NO FURTHER ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN. HE FELT WE SHOULD MAKE DEMAND ON
THOSE FUNDS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE GO AHEAD AND REMOVE THE BALANCE
AND FILE A LIEN.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER WODTKE FOR PURPOSES OF DISCUSSION, TO DETERMINE THAT THE DEBRIS
REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY W. E. ORTH ET AL (19-32-39-00001-
0160-00003.0); EDWARD STRNAD, CONNECTICUT TRAILER PARK; AND MS. MINNIE
ROSS, WABASSO, IS DECLARED TO BE HAZARDOUS AND PRESENTING A SAFETY
AND HEALTH THREAT TO THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND TO MOVE
THAT SAID DEBRIS BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION
OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE APPROPRIATE LIEN FILED AGAINST
THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE
OWNER, BASED ON THE FACT THAT THESE OWNERS WERE PREVIOUSLY GIVEN
NOTICE WHEN DEMOLITION OF THE STRUCTURES WAS AUTHORIZED,
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WISHED TO BE SURE THAT
THEY HAVE HAD PROPER NOTICE, AND COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE
WOULD PREFER TO WRITE THEM A LETTER AND NOTIFY THEM THAT THEY HAVEN IT
FINISHED THE JOB,
COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HIS MOTION WAS BASED ON THE
FACT THAT WE HAD PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED DEMOLITION.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT WE SHOULD JUST SEND THEM A NOTICE
AND HANDLE THIS AT THE SECOND MEETING IN APRIL.
COMMISSIONER LYONS WITHDREW HIS MOTION AND COMMISSIONER
WODTKE WITHDREW HIS SECOND
•
'A
pr -
J
MAR 51990 800K 4z PAGE 873
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO SEE
THE COUNTY AND THE ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMENT GET INTO A POSITION
WHERE PEOPLE WITH THESE STRUCTURES DO NOT REMOVE THEM THEMSELVES
BECAUSE THEY FEEL THE COUNTY WILL DO IT CHEAPER. HE FELT THIS SHOULD
BE DONE ONLY FOR THOSE WHO ARE INDIGENT AND CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY FOR
THE REMOVAL AND THAT IS WHY HE WISHED TO BE SURE THAT THE .ADMINISTRATOR
HAS MORE THAN ONE ALTERNATIVE. HE NOTED THERE ARE SOME CORPORATIONS
INVOLVED IN THE HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES JUST DISCUSSED.
BUILDING DIRECTOR RYMER POINTED OUT THAT IT IS IMPORTANT TO
MOVE EXPEDITIOUSLY.
RICHARD BOSO, PRESIDENT OF THE INDIAN RIVER BLACK POWDER
ASSOCIATION, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THE REQUEST MADE IN
THE FOLLOWING LETTER:
65 -
Indian River Black Powder Assn.
P. 0. Box 2913
Vero Beach Florida 32960
February 8,1930
Indian River County Commission
T_ndian River County Court House
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Commissioners;
The members of The Indian River Black Powder Associo.tion Irish to
submit for your consideration and evaluation the possibility of
developing a public shooting range. We submit the said range could
be located on the parcel of land which lies southeast of the inter-
section of 74th. Ave. and 4th. Street, which is owned by the county.
A represenitive of our organization would be happy to meet with
you at your convenience to discuss this matter further and answer
any questions you may have.
Si rely
r
Richard Boso, President
Indian River Black Powder Assn.
CHARTER IMEMIBER
National Rifle Association -National Muzzle Loaders Rifle Assn.
Florida Muzzle Loaders Rifle Assn. -Un fai ed Sportsman
MR. BOSO INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING AS A
NON-PROFIT CLUB TO ESTABLISH A SHOOTING RANGE AND WISH TO LEASE THE
LAND FROM THE COUNTY SO THE CLUB COULD HAVE.A SAFE PLACE TO SHOOT
UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THEY COULD, WITH THE COUNTY'S HELP, SPONSOR A
•' 4
PUBLIC SHOOTING FACILITY. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY HAVE WRITTEN TO THE
a
SWK 4
MAR 51980
MAR 51900 4-2 �Av 875
NRA AND HAVE RECEIVED A GOODLY AMOUNT OF INFORMATION ON SHOOTING
RANGES, AND HE BELIEVED THERE ARE CERTAIN FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS
AVAILABLE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE DID CONTACT THE PRISON,
BUT THE PISTOL RANGE THEY ARE CONSTRUCTING IS NOT SUITABLE FOR THIS
TYPE OF ACTIVITY, AND THE SHERIFF DOES NOT KNOW OF A SUITABLE PLACE
EITHER. THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT HE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THAT THE
SKEET SHOOTING CLUB HAS LOST THEIR LEASE ALSO AND ARE INTERESTED IN
FINDING ANOTHER FACILITY. HE DID NOT FEEL THAT THE COUNTY IS READY
AT THIS TIME TO ESTABLISH A PUBLIC SHOOTING RANGE, BUT FELT WE MIGHT
GIVE SOME CONSIDERATION TO LEASING PROPERTY. THE CHAIRMAN COMMENTED
THAT WHILE THE BLACK POWDER ASSOCIATION DOES NOT HAVE A GREAT DEAL
OF MONEY, APPARENTLY THEY DO HAVE INSURANCE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS INQUIRED ABOUT THE NUMBER OF YARDS THAT
WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR SUCH A RANGE AND ALSO ASKED ABOUT THE MAXIMUM
RANGE OF A MUZZLE LOADER$
MR. BOSO STATED THAT WOULD NEED UP TO 100 YARDS, AND THAT
THE MAXIMUM RANGE WOULD BE UP TO A MILE OR A MILE AND A HALF, DEPENDING
ON THE POWDER CHARGE, WHICH THEY MEASURE THEMSELVES. HE NOTED THE
PIECE OF PROPERTY IN QUESTION CONTAINS ABOUT 35-1/2 ACRES AND HE
BELIEVED IT IS HALF TAKEN UP WITH DEBRIS.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON EXPLAINED THAT THIS IS THE
OLD SOUTH COUNTY STUMP DUMP WHERE THE COUNTY PUT THE HURRICANE DEBRIS,
WHICH THEY PLAN TO BURN.
MR. BOSO NOTED THAT THERE ARE SOME EXISTING EMBANKMENTS ON
THIS PROPERTY, AND MR. NELSON STATED THAT HE HAD NOT REALIZED THAT
THE SAFETY FAN WOULD REQUIRE ONE MILE AND THE BANK WOULD HAVE TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE ONE MILE SAFETY FAN.
MR. BOSO POINTED OUT THAT ONLY A DELIBERATE SHOT ABOVE THE
EMBANKMENT WOULD CARRY A MILE)AND HE BELIEVED THERE IS NOTHING AROUND
FOR AT LEAST A MILE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THE BOARD MUST TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION
THAT THIS PROPERTY HAS CONSIDERABLE WORTH, AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS
67 _
MARM900
NOTED THAT THIS IS THE CLOSEST BORROW PIT AREA THE COUNTY HAS, PART
OF IT HAS BEEN MINED AND FILLED BACK IN, BUT PART OF THIS I'S STILL
THE BORROW AREA WHICH THE COUNTY WI -LL BE USING FOR SOME TIME TO COME.
DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO WHETHER THE FILLED AREA WOULD BE
SUITABLE FOR SHOOTING RANGES, AND MR. BOSO DOUBTED IT, BUT EXPLAINED
THAT THE AREA THEY WERE USING BEFORE WAS ABOUT 90` WIDE AND THEY
USUALLY SHOOT ON THE SECOND SUNDAY OF THE MONTH. THEY HAVE NO GREAT
PROBLEM WITH SHIFTING FROM PLACE TO PLACE, AND THERE WOULD BE NO
PERMANENT STRUCTURES.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THE FIRING LINE
IS NO PROBLEM; IT IS THE IMPACT AREA.
MR. BOSO INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE MEETS IN SEBRING
AND THERE ARE OTHER CLUBS IN THE AREA THAT HAVE INDIVIDUAL RANGES
AND SCHEDULED MEETS. THE STATE RANGE IS NEAR SANFORD, AND THEY USE
RUBBER TIRES FOR BACKSTOPS.
COMMISSIONER LYONS DISCUSSED THE RESIDENTS IN THE SURROUNDING
AREA AND FELT THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE SOME SORT OF HORIZONTAL BARRIER
THAT WOULD INSURE THAT NO ONE COULD ELEVATE THEIR FIREARM TO ALLOW A
PROJECTILE TO ABOVE THE EMBANKMENT.
e COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF MR. BOSO WAS AWARE THAT THE LONG
RANGE PLANS FOR KIWANIS-HOBART PARK DESIGNATE AN AREA FOR THIS TYPE
OF ACTIVITY, AND NOTED THAT IT WAS HOPED WE COULD EVENTUALLY DEVELOP
A FACILITY THERE TO ACCOMMODATE SEVERAL CLUBS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO COORDINATING MR. BOSOMS
REQUEST WITH THE NEEDS OF THE SKEET SHOOTERS, AND MR, BOSO STATED
THAT HIS CLUB WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO SHARING THE LAND.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WE MUST JUSTIFY THAT THIS IS
A PROPER USE OF THE LAND AND THERE IS ENOUGH INTEREST BY ENOUGH
PEOPLE TO TIE UP THE LAND.
COMMISSIONER Loy STATED SHE WOULD HAVE A PROBLEM WITH LETTING
COUNTY LAND BE USED BY JUST A SMALL GROUP.
MR. BOSO ASKED IF THEY COULD ARRANGE TO HAVE A COUNTY -WIDE
PETITION EXPRESSING INTERESTJIF THAT WOULD INFLUENCE THE BOARD'S
THINKING.
4-:;
Box 42 PAGE 877
COMMISSIONER LAY FELT THAT WOULD INDICATE THERE WAS 000NTY-
WIDE INTEREST, BUT IT WILL NOT MAKE MUCH DIFFERENCE AS TO THE PRIVATE
USAGE. SHE AGAIN NOTED THAT THIS IS IN THE LONG RANGE PLAN FOR KIWANIS-
HOBART PARK AND A PETITION WOULD JUST MOVE IT UP ON THE PRIORITY LIST.
A GENTLEMAN IN THE AUDIENCE ASKED IF IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE
TO DEVELOP AN INTERIM RANGE AT THE PARK, AND COMMISSIONER LOY FELT
IT WOULD BE AVAILABLE JUST LIKE OTHER PARTS OF THE PARK. SHE NOTED
WE HAVE A FULL TIME SUPERVISOR OF THE PARK WHO SCHEDULES EVENTS.
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT SINCE WE ALREADY HAVE A SUPERVISOR
AT THIS PARK, WE WOULD HAVE MORE CONTROL AND IT WOULD BE A BETTER
SITUATION.
COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED AND FELT THIS MATTER SHOULD BE
EXPLORED SINCE THERE ARE 600 ACRES IN THE PARK AND IT IS FENCED IN.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INSTRUCTED MR. BOSO TO TALK TO THE KIWANIS
CLUB SINCE IT IS ONE OF THEIR MAIN PROJECTS, AND HE FELT THAT THE
CLUB SHOULD SHOW US SOME INTEREST OTHER THAN JUST THEIR SMALL GROUP,
BRING BACK A COMPLETE PLAN, SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, ETC.
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION FOR
THE HIRING OF A NEW VETERANS' SERVICE OFFICER.
69
TO:
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
Jack G. Jennings, County Administrator
Robert Donlon, Personnel Director
February 25, 1980
Due to the resignation of John Hrkach, I would like to
recommend that Jerry Cook be promoted to Pay Grade 13, Veterans'
Service Officer.
In his present position as Assistant Service Officer, he
has proven to be more than satisfactory. He meets all the qualifications
for the position as required by the State and County.
His appointment should become effective March 28, 1980, and
if this appointment is approved, we should start a search for an Assistant
Veterans' Officer as soon as possible.
_ V
R. D.
I concur with the recommendation of the Personnel
Director and recommend approval by the Board of
County Commissioners.
/lh
J.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER LOY, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 80-26 APPOINTING JERRY COOK AS
VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER EFFECTIVE MARCH 28, 1980,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO PAY RANGE, AND ASSISTANT ADMINIS-
TRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THERE IS A PAY GRADE AND BASIC ENTRY LEVEL
FOR THAT POSITION, AND THE REGULATIONS READ THAT WITHIN SIX MONTHS IF
HE IS SATISFACTORY, HE GETS A 5% INCREASE. HE FELT THE PRESENT
VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER IS IN A 12 CATEGORY.
PERSONNEL OFFICER DONLON CONFIRMED THAT THE PRESENT SERVICE
OFFICER, .JOHN HRKACH, IS IN GRADE 12. HE STATED THAT CODY & ASSOCIATES
HAVE RECLASSIFIED THIS POSITION AND HAVE UPGRADED IT FROM GRADE 12
MAR 5 19 80 2
70 Vic* - �� 7
p .
r
MAR 51980
Box. 42 f%&E 879
TO GRADE 13. GRADE 12 RANGES FROM $10,972 To $15,371, AND 13 FROM
$11,523 To $16,099. THE PRESENT VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER HAS A
SALARY OF,$11,523, AND THIS IS THE RECOMMENDATION FOR MR. COOK.
CODY & ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDED THAT THIS CHANGE BE MADE IN THIS MANNER
AT THIS TIME.
MR. DONLON COMMENTED THAT ANYONE PROMOTED AUTOMATICALLY
STARTS A NEW PROBATIONARY PERIOD; THE INCREASE IS NOT AUTOMATIC.
DISCUSSIONS THEN FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO YEARLY EVALUATIONS.
MR. NELSON NOTED THAT THEY ARE ALSO RECOMMENDING THAT WE
SEARCH FOR AN ASSISTANT VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER SINCE THAT JOB HAS
GOTTEN QUITE LARGE, HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS SCHEDULED .JERRY COOK
TO REPORT TO THE COMMISSIONERS IN APRIL ABOUT THE SCOPE OF THE
VETERANS SERVICE OFFICERS JOB. HE ALSO NOTED THAT THIS JOB WAS
CHECKED WITH OTHER COUNTIES, AND THEY HAVE IT SET AT A 13 PAY GRADE.
THE ASSISTANT ALSO WOULD GO ONE GRADE HIGHER OR FROM 7 TO S.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON
AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
71
m
RESOLUTION NO. 80-26
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That JERRY R. COOK, JR. is
hereby appointed as INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VETERAN'S SERVICE
OFFICER to replace JOHN J. HRKACH, said appointment to become
effective as of March 28, 1980.
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the
5th day of March , 1980.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Willard W. Siebert, r., rman
Attest:
Freda Wright, C�eet
MAR 51980
J
r
MAR 5 19 80
Boa 42. PAGE 881
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RESIGNATION OF VETERANS
SERVICE OFFICER JOHN HRKACH EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 27: 1980 AND
AUTHORIZED THE PREPARATION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 80-27 HONORING
MR. HRKACH FOR HIS SERVICE.
73
MARM980
,l
NO. 80
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, JOHN J. HRKACH has submitted his resignation as
Indian River County Veterans Service Officer; and
WHEREAS, JOHN J. HRKACH has served as the Indian River
County Veterans Service Officer with diligence during a period
in which Indian River County has experienced tremendous growth
and, consequently, increased the burden upon all of its Governmenta
Officials; and
WHEREAS, JOHN J. HRKACH has served with great distinction
since his appointment on April 30, 1976 to the effective date of
his resignation of March 27, 1980 on behalf of the servicemen
within Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County wishes to publicly acknowledge and thank JOHN J. HRKACH
for his tireless efforts on behalf of the servicemen of Indian
River County;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board
on behalf of itself and the servicemen of Indian River County
expresses its deep appreciation to JOHN J. HRKACH for his devotion
to the servicemen of Indian River County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the Board wishes JOHN J. HRKACH
continued success in his future endeavors.
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 5th
day of March , 1980.
CO R V
Chair an, County Commiss' rs
C/ U U U U U U U U U U U U V V U U V U U U Ua� U 9
LZ MAR 51980 H
MAR 519 00 BOOK 42 F9E 883
ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT AGENDA ITEM 18, WHICH
INCLUDED UTILITY IMPACT FEES AND PROCEDURES, AS WELL AS A RESOLUTION
IN REGARD TO THE NEW ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FINANCING, BE HELD
OVER AND TAKEN UP AT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD ON MARCH 12TH
AT 10:00 A.M., AT WHICH TIME REPRESENTATIVES OF WILLIAM P. HOUGH
CO. COULD BE PRESENT. THE BOARD AGREED.
ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED THAT THE APPLICA-
TION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL ON THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING HAS
BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, AND HE BELIEVED WE HAVE IT
THERE IN ENOUGH TIME TO GET IT ON THEIR MARCH 20TH AGENDA. HE CON-
TINUED THAT HE DID NOT BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY PROBLEM, BUT THAT HE
HAD ASSURED CITY PLANNING DIRECTOR LES SOLIN THAT THE COUNTY WANTED
TO DO EVERYTHING NECESSARY TO GET FULL APPROVAL FROM THE CITY ON
THE SITE PLAN.
COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT THE NEXT STEP, AND MR.
NELSON INFORMED HER THAT THEY HAVE SENT THE LETTER REQUIRED BY THE
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO THE CONSTRUCTOR, STATING THAT THE AWARD IS
CONDITIONED ON RECEIVING SITE PLAN APPROVAL. HOPEFULLY, ON MARCH
21ST, WE CAN GO BACK AND SAY SITE PLAN APPROVAL HAS BEEN APPROVED,
AND WE CAN THEN CONTINUE ON WITH THE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE, ETC.
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE, HERCULES KONTOULAS,
INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE HAVE TO SEND REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
TWO SEPARATE CONTRACTS, AND AFTER THEY RECEIVE AND SIGN THEM, THEY
ARE TO BE RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION FOR SIGNATURE. WITH THESE
DOCUMENTS, THEY ARE TO SEND PROOF OF INSURANCE, PERFORMANCE BOND.-
ETC.,
OND,
ETC., AND WE THEN NOTIFY THEM BY LETTER WHEN TO PROCEED. BEFORE
CONSTRUCTION STARTS, WE HAVE THE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF WE CAN REQUIRE THEM TO QUALIFY
THEIR SUBCONTRACTORS, AND MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT WE CAN. HE NOTED
THAT THE SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE MADE PUBLIC WHEN THEY SUBMIT THE
CONTRACT. HE POINTED OUT THAT IF WE ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE SUBS,
REINHOLD'S NEXT SUB POSSIBLY COULD PRESENT A HIGHER FIGURE. HE CON-
TINUED THAT A PROBLEM WITH SUBS AROSE AT THE HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT, AND
THE CONTRACTOR HAD TO CO-SIGN WITH THE SUB BECAUSE HE WAS NOT FINANCI-
ALLY STABLE.
M�51980 _ 75 _ �
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT THIS PROBLEM CAN BE RESOLVED.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE THEN DISCUSSED THE LIQUIDATION CLAUSES,
AND ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT WHAT THE COMMISSION SHOULD BE CONSIDERING
IS THE RELOCATION PROBLEM AND THAT THIS SHOULD BE WORKED ON AND
SCHEDULED SOON.
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE COMMISSION THAT THE SCHOOL
BOARD NOW HAS SIGNED THE LEASE WITH THE COUNTY FOR SPACE IN THE NEW
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION COMPLEX. HE NOTED THAT IT IS BASICALLY IN
THE FORM THE BOARD APPROVED, AND HE FELT THAT THE BOARD NOW COULD
AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE LEASE WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD
FOR SPACE IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION COMPLEX AND AUTHORIZED THE
SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
SAID LEASE WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN RECEIVED.
THE BOARD RETURNED TO THE MATTER OF FINAL APPROVAL OF
SEAGROVE SUBDIVISION WHICH WAS DISCUSSED EARLIER IN THE DAY, AND
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS FOUND THE STATEMENT
HE WAS LOOKING FOR ON THE PLAT CONCERNING THE DEDICATION, AND IT IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE PREVIOUS PLATS SO HIS OBJECTION IS OVERCOME.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE ALSO NEEDED A DEED FOR THE
STRIP ON S.. R.. AIA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL OF SEAGROVE SUBDI-
VISION, UNIT #4, CONTINGENT ON RECEIPT OF THE DEED FOR A PORTION OF
TRACT A, AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE, NOTING THAT THE
COUNTY WILL NOT SIGN THE PLAT UNTIL IT HAS BEEN COMPLETELY SIGNED BY
ALL OTHER PARTIES.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE, WHO IS TO BE THE HEARING OFFICER FOR
THE ZOI PUBLIC HEARING, EXPRESSED THE BELIEF THAT THIS WILL BE A
RELATIVELY ROUTINE MEETING SINCE PEOPLE MAINLY SEEM TO BE IN CONCUR-
RENCE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO HOLD IT IN THE COMMISSION ROOM, IF THAT
IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE BOARD.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AND COMMISSIONER LYONS BOTH STATED THAT
THEY HAVE GOTTEN THE IMPRESSION THAT THERE IS A LOT OF INTEREST AND
THERE WELL MAY BE A LOT OF PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE.
76 A*K 42 WE°884
MAR 51980
I
ax 42. pAc'E885
IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT THE 201
HEARING SHOULD BE HELD IN CITY HALL, IF AVAILABLE, ON WEDNESDAY,
APRIL 16, 1980, AT 7:00 P.M., AND THE USE OF A COURT REPORTER AND
A BACK-UP TAPE WAS ALSO DISCUSSED.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR HANDLE
THE PUBLIC NOTICES WHICH WILL BE SUBMITTED TO HIM BY CHARLES SWALLOWS.
MR. SWALLOWS STATED THAT THIS HEARING SHOULD BE ADVERTISED
ONCE 30 DAYS PRIOR, ONCE 15 DAYS PRIOR, AND POSSIBLY ONCE AGAIN 5
DAYS PRIOR. HE RECOMMENDED THAT IT BE ADVERTISED ALL THREE TIMES.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A
REQUEST FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO SIGN A REQUISITION
FOR AN ADDITIONAL $93,542 FOR THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM,
AND HE DID NOT WANT TO SIGN THIS WITHOUT ALL THE COMMISSIONERS BEING
AWARE OF IT.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN REPORTED ON THE STATUS
OF THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, STATING THAT NOT ONLY DO THEY HAVE
14 LEASES SIGNED, BUT THERE ARE TEN OTHER OWNERS WHO ARE PAINTING
THEIR UNITS, FIXING PLUMBING, ETC., AND HOPEFULLY, THESE WILL BE
APPROVED WITHIN THE NEXT TWO TO THREE WEEKS. HE NOTED THAT THIS IS
A DIFFICULT PROGRAM BECAUSE OF THE UPPER LIMITS SET ON THE RENTS,
BUT CONTINUED THAT THEY HAVE THE LATITUDE TO INCREASE THE RENTS BY
ANOTHER 10% IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE UNIT IS IN GOOD CONDITION.
HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE FAIR MARKET RENTAL SHOWN IN HIS SUMMARY
WILL BE INCREASED ABOUT 15% BY THE GOVERNMENT ON MARCH 31ST. MR.
REGAN STATED THAT THEY ARE ABLE,TO FIND HOUSING IN ABOUT FOUR OUT OF
10 CASES WHERE PEOPLE ARE ELIGIBLE TO BE ASSISTED.
DISCUSSON ENSUED ON THE TECHNICALITIES OF THE PROGRAM,
WHETHER RENTALS INCLUDED UTILITIES, ETC., AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED
THAT WHAT CONCERNS HIM IS HOW MUCH WE HAVE SPENT ON THE ADMINISTRA-
TION OF THIS PROGRAM IN RELATION TO WHAT WE HAVE ACCOMPLISHED.
THE BOARD THEN WENT INTO A DETAILED DISCUSSION OF THE SALA-
RIES PAID, OVERHEAD EXPENSES, AND START-UP FUNDS, WHICH AMOUNT TO
$40,000. IT WAS NOTED WE HAVE 120 UNITS APPROVED AND SO FAR HAVE
FILLED 14 WITH TEN ANTICIPATED.
77
MAM 1980
MR.-REGAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY AVERAGE FOUR PEOPLE
PER CASE OR UNIT. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT IN ONE CASE WHERE A PERSON
WAS OUT OF A JOB AND WAS GIVEN THE RENTAL ASSISTANCE, HE THEN FOUND
A JOB AND THEY WERE ABLE TO TAKE HIM OFF THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
MR. REGAN POINTED OUT THAT ROTATING SOMEONE IS THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF
THE PROGRAM;
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CONTINUED TO QUESTION HOW REQUISITIONING
SUCH A LARGE AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL FUNDS COULD BE JUSTIFIED, AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN FELT THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER
THAT TO START UP A BUSINESS EFFECTIVELY, IT ISN IT THE COST PER UNIT
INITIALLY. THIS IS A FIVE-YEAR CONTRACT, AND YOU WOULD HAVE ROTATING
CONTRACTS. DISCUSSION THEN FOLLOWED ON THE MONTHLY OVERHEAD COST
PER UNIT, WHICH FIGURED OUT TO $23.00 A MONTH ON 120 UNITS, BUT AT
PRESENT WOULD AMOUNT TO ABOUT $200 A MONTH PER UNIT FOR FOURTEEN UNITS.
MR. REGAN REITERATED THAT THERE ARE TEN MORE UNITS BEING
FIXED UP THAT SHOULD QUALIFY SHORTLY AND NOTED THAT WE DO HAVE A
VEHICLE HERE TO ENCOURAGE THE OWNERS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THEIR
HOUSING. HE POINTED OUT THAT WE ARE RENTING TO BOTH BLACK AND WHITE
AND HAVE ACCESS TO ALL UNITS IN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DID NOT BELIEVE THEY WILL RENT THE UNITS
AT THE PRICE SET, BUT COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT WE HAVE OVER
100 APPLICANTS, AND HE DID NOT FEEL THAT $237 FOR TWO SMALL BEDROOMS
IS MUCH UNDER THE MARKET. HE STATED THAT HE WAS PLEASED THAT THERE
ARE SO MANY TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE PROGRAM, AND FELT THERE
ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING AND HOPEFULLY WILL
IMPROVE THEIR UNITS TO MEET THE NEEDS.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGAIN EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT SPENDING
$40,000 OF THE TAXPAYERS' MONEY TO FILL JUST FOURTEEN UNITS.
COMMISSIONER LAY STATED THAT IF THIS PROGRAM WERE TWO
YEARS OLD, SHE ALSO WOULD BE CONCERNED, BUT IT IS HARD TO GET A
PROGRAM GOING FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE STANDPOINT. SHE AGREED THAT SHE
WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE RESULTS JUSTIFY THE COSTS, BUT EMPHASIZED THAT
WE HAVE JUST GOTTEN STARTED.
A
COMMISSIONER LYONS CONCURRED THAT IT IS TOO SOON TO JUDGE.
78
42�E
MAR 51980° :r
I
MAR 51990 Boa 42 'SAGE 887
MR. REGAN POINTED OUT THAT WE NOW ARE WORKING TO SET UP
THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THIS PROGRAM IS JUST THE FIRST STAGE OF
THESE ACTIVITIES.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT WE ALSO ARE ASKING FOR ANOTHER
$79,000 IN THE NEXT SIX MONTHS FOR ANOTHER 85 UNITS.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN STATED THAT IF WE
HAVE BEEN MAKING EFFORTS AND ARE GETTING REASONABLE RESULTS, THE
GOVERNMENT WILL STAY WITH THE PROGRAM. HE BELIEVED HE COULD DEFEND
THE COUNTY'S POSITION TO THE GOVERNMENT THOROUGHLY AT THIS MOMENT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED HOW MUCH OF THE $40,000 START-UP
FUNDS FOR THE 120 UNITS UNDER THE 60 MONTH GRANT WE HAVE DRAWN DOWN,
AND MR. REGAN STATED THAT WE HAVE DRAWN HALF. MR. REGAN THEN EX-
PLAINED THAT AFTER WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE FIRST YEAR, YOU ARE PAID
$15.00 PER UNIT FOR WHAT YOU ARE HANDLING, OR 8-1/2% OF THE TOTAL
RENTAL, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, AND WE WILL BE ABLE TO CARRY OVER INTO
THE SECOND YEAR ANY FEES WE HAVE MADE THIS YEAR. HE FURTHER NOTED
THAT $10,000 WENT INTO EQUIPMENT SO WE ACTUALLY WERE GIVEN $50,000
FOR START UP,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CONTINUED TO DISCUSS THE REQUISITION
FIGURES, AND MR. REGAN NOTED THAT IF WE DON T GET ENOUGH MONEY, THERE
IS NO WAY TO COVER THE RENTS.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WE HAVE PAID $1,931.00 IN
HOUSING ASSISTANCE SO FAR, AND THE REQUISITION IS SAYING THAT IN THE
NEXT MONTHS, WE WILL SPEND $93,000.
MR. REGAN POINTED OUT THAT MOST OF THE LEASES WERE SIGNED
IN THE LAST TWO WEEKS. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS
ALLOCATED THIS OVER A YEAR S TIME, AND IF THE FUNDS AREN'T DRAWN
DOWN, THEY TAKE THEM BACK. HE STATED THAT HIS BEST INFORMATION FROM
HUD IS THAT WE WOULD BE IN ERROR NOT TO ASK FOR THESE FUNDS.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE D+ID NOT WANT TO GET
TO THE POINT WHERE WE HAVE USED THE $40,000 START UP FUNDS AND HAVE
TO GET IN THE POSITION OF SENDING BACK MONEY WE DON T HAVE, HE FELT
WE SHOULD KEEP HUD APPRISED OF OUR EFFORTS AS WE.GO ALONG AND OF THE
FACT THAT WE DO HAVE APPLICANTS, BUT NOT ENOUGH UNITS IN THE PROPER
RATE STRUCTURE.
MAREP980
COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD COMMISSIONER
WODTKE'S CONCERN, BUT FELT WE MUST TAKE THE NEXT STEP AND THAT WE
SHOULD WAIT ANOTHER NINETY DAYS AND GET A BETTER FEEL FOR THIS SITUA-
TION BEFORE RAISING THE FLAG TO HUD.
COMMISSIONER Loy CONCURRED THAT IT IS VERY HARD TO GET
THESE PROGRAMS GOING AND THAT YOU MUST GIVE THEM SOME TIME.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT LEFT THE ROOM WITH A SEVERE NOSEBLEED,
AND VICE CHAIRMAN LOY TOOK OVER THE MEETING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, COMMISSIONER DEESON AND VICE CHAIRMAN Loy VOTED IN FAVOR,
THE BOARD AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN OR VICE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE
REQUISITION FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS, HOUSING
ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM, ACC CONTRACT PLUMBER A-3409, HUD FORM
52663.
•
r 79
�O 1 MAR 51980 52663
MaK 42 FADE 889
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN U'�Vt:LOPMENT FOR HUD USE ONLY.
•
REQUISITION FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM %'oucher Numhcr
SECTION 23 0 SECTION 8
Date of Requisition Mar. 1, 1980 Fiscal Year ending Date Sept. 30,1980 For Quarter Ending June 30, 1980
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY (lncludinl .alp Code)
ACC Contract Number A-3409
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
800, 20th Place Suite 3 Vero Beach Fla. 32960
Project NumberFL-29E132-001
No. of Months in Fiscal Year 15
Type of Project:
DEPOSITARY BANK Maine. Address and Account Number)
First Citrus Bank
Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 Acct. #98-04000-1
® EXISTING � NEW � REHAB.
a. i'?t�umbor of Units Under lease to Eligible Families as of Date of Requisition 14
b. Estimated Number of Units to be under Leese at End of Requested Quarter 85
c. Average Monthly Housing Assistance Payment Per Unit as of Date of Requisition 113
DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATE OF
REQUIRED
ANNUAL
CONTRIBUTIONS
TOTAL COST
INCURRED
TO DATE
ESTIMATED
ADDITIONAL
COST END
OF REQUUESTED
QUARTER
CUMULATIVE
TOTAL
FUNDS
REQUIRED
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE
1. Preliminary Administrative Expense—Prior to ACC (Account 4010)
0
0
0
40,387
20,064
20,323
40,387
2. Preliminary Administrative Expense—After ACC (Account 4012)
40 387
20.064
20,323
40.387
3. Total Preliminary Administrative Expense (Lincs 1 & 2)
NONEXPENDABLE EQUIPMENT,
4. Replacement of Nonexpendable Equipment (Account 7520)
5. Property Betterments and Additions (Account 7540)
y'
�:,•
0
8,658
0
1,722
0
10,380
10,380
8,658
1.722
10.380
S. Total Nonexpendable Equipment (Lines 4 & 5)
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS
7. Housing Assistance Payments (Account4715)
134,754
1,931
93,542
95,473
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
8. Total Administrative Fee Approved for Fiscal Year
17.760
9. Monthly Rete of Administrative Fee (Line 8 dipided by number of months
In fiscal year)
1,184
10. Amount Previously Requisitioned for fiscal year
7,074
10,686
11. Estimated Additional Amount Required to end of Requested Quarter
17-760
12. Total Administrative Fee (Lincs 10& 11)
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT AUDIT COSTS (Section 8 only)
13. Total Independent Public Accountant Audit, Costs
0
0
SECURITY AND UTILITY DEPOSITS (Section 23 only)
14. Total Allowance Approved for Security and Utility Deposits
0
15. Amount Previously Requisitioned for Fiscal Year
1G. Estimated Additional Amount Requirud to End of Requested Quarter
17. Total Security and Utility Deposits (Lines 15 & 16)
AMOUNT OF THIS REQUISITION
18. Total Funds Required to End of Requested Quarter (Lines 3, 6, 7, 12,
13 & 17)
164,000
93,110
19. Total Partial Payments Received for Fiscal Year to Date
70,890
20. Partial Payment Requested (Line 18 minus Line 19)
IST
INSTALLMENT
2ND
INSTALLMENT
3RD
INSTALLMENT
TOTAL
METHOD OF PAYMENT
21. Requested Installment Payments
23,630
23,63Q
1 23,630
1 CERTIFY that housing assistance payments have been or will be made only with respect to units which: 111 are under louse by Families at the time such
housing assistance payments are made except as otherwise provided in the Housing Assistamm Payments Contracts and (2) the Housing Agency has within
one year prior to the making of such housing assistance payments, adequately inspected or caused to he inspected (including inspection of grcunds, foeilities.
and areas for the benefit and use of the Families) to assure that decent, safe and sanitary housing accommodations are being provided; that all applicable pro-
visions of the above numbered Contract have been complied with by the Housing Agency; and that this requisition for annual contributions has been exam-
ined by me and to the best of my knowludgo and belief it is true, correct and complete.
Indian R r CoMian
(Nun Public Housinq ,,, gency)
- March 1, 1980 �a vice Chairman
(Date) (Signature & Title of Official Authorized to Certify)
HUD FIELD OFFICE APPROVAL
(Signature and 'lltte of Official A uthorized to Approve) (Date)
REGIONAL ACCOUNTING DIVISION
Prevalidatedby:
PAYMENT
FOR
MONTH OF
APA DNT
DATE
CERTIFIED FOR
PAYMENT
CERTIFIED
By
(initials)
(Signature)
(Date) -
MAR _ _ ._ ® TOTAL
Replaces Form IUJD-52663 dated June 19711.
HUD -52663
VICE CHAIRMAN Loy INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE ARE IN RECEIPT
OF AN AUDIT ON THE CETA TITLE II FUNDS, WHICH GOES BACK TO 1975.
ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, A MISTAKE WAS MADE AT THAT TIME,
AND THREE PEOPLE WERE HIRED AND PUT UNDER THE CETA PROGRAM BETWEEN
AUGUST OF 1974 AND JUNE of 1975, WHO WERE NOT ELIGIBLE. FINANCE
OFFICER BARTON NOW HAS DETERMINED THAT THE GOVERNMENT IS CORRECT,
AND WE OWE THEM ABOUT $6,000.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, COMMISSIONER WODTKE AND VICE CHAIRMAN Loy VOTED IN FAVOR,
THE BOARD AUTHORIZED THE FINANCE OFFICER TO PAY FROM "PRIOR YEAR
EXPENSE" UNDER THE GENERAL FUND A REFUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,4.73.00
AS REQUESTED UNDER THE AUDIT FOR THE CETA TITLE II GRANT FILED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, STATE OF FLORIDA.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
DEESON, COMMISSIONER VIODTKE AND VICE CHAIRMAN Loy VOTED IN FAVOR,
THE BOARD APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER
JERRY COOK TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL STATEWIDE VETERANS SERVICE OFFICERS
TRAINING CONFERENCE AND ABC CLINIC TO BE HELD IN DAYTONA REACH
MAY 3RD THROUGH MAY 8TH, 1980.
COMMISSIONER LYONS REPORTED THAT HE AND ATTORNEY COLLINS
HAVE DONE CONSIDERABLE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THE JOINT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, AND
THE COUNTY. HE STATED THAT HE HAS TESTED THE CITY A COUPLE OF TIMES
IN CONNECTION WITH WHAT HE FELT IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE MAIN PROBLEMS
WE HAVE - HOW TO FINANCE THE WATER AND/OR SEWER LINES ON THE SOUTH
BEACH BETWEEN THE SOUTH CITY LIMITS AND THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LINE
AND HE FELT IT IS FAIRLY EVIDENT THAT THE FINANCING OF AT LEAST THE
INITIAL INSTALLATION OF THOSE LINES WILL BE A COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY.
HE, THEREFORE, HAS GIVEN THOUGHT TO HOW WE GO ABOUT FINANCING THIS
AND HAS COME UP WITH THE IDEA OF FINANCING THE LINE ON THE BASIS
OF AN ASSESSMENT ARRANGEMENT. HE NOTED THAT ONE OF THE PROBLEMS IS
DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE OF
S.R. AIA, BUT HE BELIEVED THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT TOO MUCH
DIFFICULTY. COMMISSIONER LYONS PASSED OUT INFORMATION ON THIS MATTER
FOR THE BOARD TO REVIEW AND CONSIDER AT A LATER DATE.
RESOLUTION N0. 80-22 IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES
AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, i9gn.
MAR 51980 82 v
BOOK 2 WE 890
J
MAR 51980
Box 42 -PAGE 891
RESOLUTION NO. 80-22
WHEREAS, the Department of Revenue has received
requisitions for refunds pursuant to Florida Statutes
195.106;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That
the attached Requisitions for refunds of ad valorem taxes
approved by the Department of Revenue for the named parties
on each requisition are hereby approved for payment.
Said Resolution shall become effective as of the
20th day of February , 1980.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
P
By
Willard W. Siebert, Jr., -"Chairman
Attest:
Freda Wright, C,ll/rk/
MAM1980
/f
DR -462 DATE JAN 2 -
it Revised 12/78
(Sec. 195.106, F.S.)
DE ARTME F RE4tNu-
REQUISITION FOR REFUND OF AD VALOREM T \ES .
STATE, OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF Indian River
Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida Statutes,
Henry Anthony Fischer of. P. 0. Box 68, Sebastian, F1.
(Payee) (Residence)
lferch%• stakes application to the Department of Revenue for refund of S 1,845.47
(Amount)
„i of mone-s paid to the Count• Tax Collector and as grotinds therefor sets tip the following; fat ts:
(State reason for Refund)
S, The County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correction for 1976 Tax Roll,
correcting square footage on building which reduces the just and taxable
value from $252,450. to $123,350. This reduces the tax from $3,720.37
to $1,817.82. Dr. Fischer paid the 1976 taxes in Dec. 1976 thereby receiving
a 3% discount. With the allowance of the 3% discount on corrected amount,
the refund comes to a difference of $1,845.47.
Attached hereto is additional proof to establish sruch claim, as follows: -
A certified copy of office receipt - taxpayer lost the original.
Certificate of Correction of Tax Roll No. 5- 36032 (copy)
Sworn and subscribed to !
before me this JZ_ day
of P(t l q ?
Nry public, State of Florida al Larft
ota
(Vavee)
AV/1A
Notar. Pul)f
MAR 51980 Boa
MAR = ---b19-80
DR • 462
Revised 12/78
(Sec. 195.106, F.S.)
DATc11 0 A I{ �
i
D RTMEf Or EVEI "UE
REQUISITION FOR REFUND OF AD VALOREM TAXES
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OI- Indian River
Pursnant to Section 195.106, Florida Stat►►tes,
Henry Anthony Fischer
(Pavee)
800K 42 - PAGE m
of P. 0. Box 68, Sebastian, F1.
(Residence)
Ilereh- makes application to the Department of Re%•enne for refund of S 2.137.09
(:�n►nunt)
of n►oncN•s paid to the Comity Tax Collector and as grounds therefor sets up the following fasts:
(Slate reason for Refund)
The County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correction for 1977 Tax Rc
correcting square footage on building which reduces the just and taxable value
from $252,450. to $123,350. This reduces the 1977 tax from $4,353.12 to
$2,126.99. Dr. Fischer paid the 1977 taxes in Nov. 1977 thereby receiving a
4% discount., With the allowance of the 4% discount on corrected amount of
tax, the refund comes to $2,137.09.
-� 1 •gas)
Attached hereto is additional proof to establish such claim, as follows:- -tip
Photo of original 1977 Tax Receipt
Copy of Certificate of Correction of Tax Roll No. 5- 36031
';%�orn and subscribed to
before me this
of zxai 19
Notary public, State of Florida at larEh
My Co si„ion EXFire, April
16, 1933,
\�>tari 1'ul►lic
M=5 19 00
-A4� /J/2
Rr-MND APPROVED
DR . 452DAT~ J N 2 4 1990
Revised 12/78 `
(Sec. 195.1 C5, F.S.) // /I
DbPAR T i\ E OF%REVE" UE
REQUISITION FOR REFUND OF AD VALt)IJE`l T,%xi.,S
STATF: OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF Indian River
Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida Stattites,
Henry Anthony Fischer of P. 0. Box 68, Sebastian, Fl.
(Payee) (Residence)
Ilerebv makes application to the Department of Revenue for refund ()I'S 1,950.35
(Amount)
of moneys paid to the County Tax Collector and as grounds therefor sets tip the follohing f;icts:
(State reason for Refund)
The County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of t6eF861id'n for 1978
Tax Roll, correcting square footage on building which reduces the just and
taxable value from $252,450. to $123,350. This reduces the 1978 tax from
$3,852.33 to $1,882.28. Dr. Fischer paid the 1978 taxes in Feb.1979,
thereby receiving a 1N discount. With the allowance of the 1% discount
on corrected amount of tax, the refund comes to $1,950.35.
Allached hereto is additional proof to establish stick claim, :is follows:
Certified copy of office receipt - taxpayer lost the original.
Copy of Certificate of Correction of Tax Roll No. 5- 36030.
Sworn and subscribed to
before nie this .1Z_ day
of_bn!. ,19�
NOt3►Y Public, Mate of
My Com Florida at Lar^4i
sion Expi►es APri►�
Notary tiblic
r
MAR .5.1980,
'. 'BOOK 42, FADE 894
MAR 51980
OR - 462
Revised 12/78
(Sec. 195.106, F.S.)
BOOK...
:� 1 1��' P ROVED
t�� 2 t 198
DATE
G
CEPA Thi Nr OF hz-V lU
11F:QUI.SITIO,\ FOR IIF:FUNI) OF AI) N'ALORENI I'AXES
STATE OF F'LO1U1)A
COI. NTY OF
INDIAN RIVER
Pursuant to `ertion 195.106, Florida Stalutes,
O'Haire, Peterkin & Moran
2145 15th Ave., Vero Beach, Fl.
(l(esidenre)
llerebN- makes application to the Uepartsnenl of lievenue for refund of 359.67
(Atnount )
of tnone�s paid to the CountN• Tax Collector and as grounds therefor sets np the following facts:
(date reason for Refund)
County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correcti on No. 5-35948 to
reduce the assessed value on building which reduces the Just and taxable
value to $64,470, thus reducing the gross 1976 tax to $1,180.02. With
the allowance of 4% discount there is a refund due of $359.67. There
are attached copies showing a refund was approved in June 1979 and this
is the second reduction in taxable value and request for refund.
:Attached hereto is additional proof to establish such claiut, as follous:
Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35948
Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35869 (formerly approved)
Copy of 1976 Tax Receipt
Copy of DR Form462 approving the first request for refund
Svrorn and subscribed to
lwfon- rrre this 22 day
of• January . fg 80
\otar�I'ul,lic
Notary PlArit, State of Florida at Large
My Cocr.a:issioa Expires Od. 6, 1?30
k.nG.a bt A.••..aan i..• b Cw+•L/ C�ay�q
MA=1980
/z'0' Ham i re� Peterkin & Moran
't
Wa► ee)
2
FUND
icy D
DATC---
TL
OR - 462
Revised 12!78 /
(Sec. 195.106, F.S.)
DEPARTfa E
REQUISITION FOR REFUND OF AD/t A1.ORF:e1 ,mv:S
STATE OF F LORMA
COUNTY OF
INDIAN RIVER
Ptirsuant to Section 195.106, Florida Statutes,
O'Haire, Peterkin & Moran
(Pacee)
of 2145 15th Ave., Vero Beach, F1'..
(Residence)
flerebv makes application to the Uepartinent of Revenue for refund of• S 403.11
(Aillotuit)
of moneN-s paid to the Comity. Tax Collector and as grounds therefor sets uli the folloHi i., fact.::
(Slate reason for Refund)
County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correction No. 5-35947'
to reduce the assessed value on building which reduces the Just and Taxable
value to $64,470, thus reducing the gross 1977 tax to $1,322.29. With the
allowance of 4% discount there is a refund due of $403.11. There are attached
copies showing a refund was approved in June 1979 and this is the second
reduction in value and. request for refund.
Allached hereto is additional proof to establish such claiiu, :is fomms:
Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35947
Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35868 (formerly approved)
Copy of 1977 Tax Receipt
Copy of DR Form 462 approving the first request for refund
Sworn and subscrilwd to
Ix -fore nie this 22 day
of January_, 19 80
Notary Public
Rotary Pubtu, State cf Florida at 1uq4
Nsy Coriimission Expires Oct. 6. 1730
{DnN'j H A..ot.0o. h.* • 4..60, coo.W/
O'Haire, Peterkin & Moran
MAR 51900tOOK
BOOK 42 -PAGE-89. 7
MAR 5-1980 x.
2/78 rDATE-;���
FU 4wpR1,0VED
'Ro
9 8
OR - 862
(Sec.1 .106
(Sac. 195.106, F.S.) /
PARTi`.1 T OF�REVE►J
HFQUISITiON FOIL REFUND 0Y AD VALOREM TA\FS
STATE: OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida `tatkites,
O'Haire, Peterkin 8 Moran of 2145 15th Ave., Vero Beach, Fl. -
(Payee) (licsidenc•e)
liereliv makes application to the Department of Revenue for refund of C 365.33
• (:lul,okml)
of noweys paid to the (:witty Tax Colleclor and as wrotcnds therefor seta kill, tike follouikk-, facts:
(Mate reason for Refund)
County Property Appraiser has issued a Certificate of Correction No. 5-35946
to reduce the assessed value on building which reduces the Just and Taxable
value to $64,470, thus reducing the gross 1978 tax to $1,199.15. With the
allowance of a 4% discount there is a refund due of $365.33. There are
attached copies showing a refund was approved in June 1979 and this is the
second reduction in value and request for refund.
Attached hereto is additional proof to Stich claim, as follotts:
Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35946
Copy of Certificate of Correction No. 5-35867 (formerly approved)
Ccpy of 1978 Tax Receipt
Copy of DR Form 462 approving the first request for refund
Sworn and subscribed to
ll,efore lie [Ilia 22 d
Of 3anuary 1 19 9b
lolary Put,tic
Molxy KIrc• of Pion'& at IN"
Mr cotar:issioa E:aaas Oct. b, 1480
MAR 980
0'H Peterkin b Moran
DR - 462
Revised 12/78
(Sec. 195.106, F.S.)
REFUND APPROVED
DATE---NOV 2 7 1 79
PARTME J OF EVEN E
REQUISPI'ION FOR REFUND OF AD VALOREM TAXES
STATE OF FLORIDA
COljNTY OF TnAjn P4va"
Pursuant to Section 195.106, Florida Statutes,
Crave$ Brne. Cn. of P. 0. Box 277 L. Wabasso. Florida
(Payee) (Residenec)
I lereby makes application to the Department of Revenue for ret'nnd of S -51 _ 43
(Atuouut)
of moues paid to the Count• 'fax Collector and as Grounds therefor sets up the folios%iur; Faris:
(Stale reason for Refund)
County Property Appraiser reduced the Classified Use Value from $35,500.
to $31,990., thereby reducing the amount of the 1978 taxes.
Allac•hed he►eto is additional proof to establish :uc h elaiu►. as follmss:
Photo of 1978 Tax Receipt validated in the amount of $606.45
Photo of Certificate of Correction of Tax Roll f5- 30755
Sworn and subscribed to
before me this ��� dav7q
l • /I � � � t�t�!.�11t1' "fir
Notary Public• —
Noary Fublic, State
Cf Florida at Lara•
June 6. 1593,
:1'
GRAVES BROS. CO. ,
BY:'
(PaNee)
42 PnE-$ 8
r
MAR 51990
soot 42: PAGE 899
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED
AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND
NOS. 64877 - 65021 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO
ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL
MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR.-
REFERENCE
UDITOR,
REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF
THESE MINUTES.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED
AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:15 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
CLERK
m
CHAIRMAN