Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/9/1980APRIL 9, 1980 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9, 1980, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLARD W. SIEBERT, .JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, SJR.; R. DON DEESON; AND PATRICK B. LYONS. ALSO PRESENT WERE JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, ,JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JEFFREY-BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; VIRGINIA HARGREAVES AND JANICE W. CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERKS. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER. COMMISSIONER LYONS LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND REVEREND JAMES M. RATCLIFF, CHRIST UNITED METHODIST BY—THE— SEA GAVE THE INVOCATION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THERE WOULD BE ANY EMERGENCY ITEMS TO ADD TO THE AGENDA. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAS PREPARED A RESOLUTION THAT HE WOULD LIKE THE BOARD TO CONSIDER REGARDING THE ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED ADDING THE ABOVE EMERGENCY ITEM TO THE AGENDA. COMMISSIONER LOY REPORTED SHE RECEIVED AND WOULD DISTRIBUTE TO THE BOARD A LETTER FROM THE FIREFIGHTERS INVITING MEMBERS OF THE BOARD TO BE RIBBON CUTTERS ON TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 1980 AT 3:30 AT THE AIRPORT FAIRGROUNDS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED HE WANTED THE BOARD TO CONSIDER ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, WHICH HE WILL DISCUSS UNDER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MATTERS. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 12, 1980. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THIS ITEM BE CONTINUED UNTIL d THE NEXT MEETING SINCE SEVERAL COMMISSIONERS MISPLACED THEIR COPIES OF THE MINUTES. 0 APR BOOK 43 PAGE 144 9 19 - - J r . APR 91980 MK - .43 PAGE145 THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF',MARCH 19, 1980. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 191 19801 AS WRITTEN. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 261 1980. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF.THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 261 1980, AS WRITTEN. FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON ADVISED THAT IN ITEM N0. 3 OF THE CLERK'S AGENDA, $6,783 14AS THE AMOUNT EXPENDED FOR THE POLL WORKERS' PAYROLL IN THE PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY. THE BOARD DISCUSSED ITEM N0. 2 OF THE CLERK'S AGENDA REGARDING TRAVEL AND EDUCATION EXPENSES FOR THE DATA PROCESSING PERSONNEL. FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON EXPLAINED THERE ARE SEVERAL PHASES IN THE SCHOOLING AND THE TWO EMPLOYEES HAVE BEGUN THEIR COURSES, WHICH ARE HELD IN ATLANTA AND ORLANDO.. HE ADVISED THAT SINCE OUR PRESENT. SYSTEM HAS TO BE CONVERTED, THEY WILL BE TAUGHT HOW TO PERFORM THE CONVERSION WORK. MR. BARTON COMMENTED THAT THERE IS NO CHARGE FOR THE EXECUTIVE COURSE, BUT THE HOUSING ACCOMMODATIONS WILL HAVE TO BE PAID. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CARRY A -CONCEALED FIREARM FOR THE FOLLOWING: EDWARD-W.-MATTHEWS GLOVER HUSTON ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE FUNDS FROM THE EQUIPMENT RENT ACCOUNT FOR DATA PROCESSING FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES AND EDUCATION EXPENSES FOR DATA PROCESSING PERSONNEL, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TIT [= ACCOUNT N0. DEBIT CREDIT EDUCATION 01-2551-328.01 $3,500 TRAVEL 01-2551-328.00 $5,000 EQUIPMENT RENT 01-2551-331.00 $8,500 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RETROACTIVELY APPROVED PAYROLL OF $6,783 FOR POLL WORKERS FOR PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY, WHICH HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE CLERKS OFFICE AND HAS BEEN PAID. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR JUDITH A. WAKEFIELD, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR, AND PETE SPYKE, AGRICULTURAL SPECIALIST, AS FOLLOWS: .JUDITH A. WAKEFIELD: April evening4-H 2 (retroactive) Orlando Planning meeting for. Area Horse Show— how-__April April 9 Ft.Pierce Area Extension Staff..Meeting April 25 Orlando Sea World tour for 4 -Hers afternoon (.those not in Marine Science Club) May 2-3 Astor Park 4-H Senior District Events Fri.af ternoon and Saturday I will need to go to Martin County one afternoon in late April to do some planning with other agents for 4-H Camp. The exact day won't be determined till the meeting on the 9th.. PETE SPYKE: APRIL 9 FT. PIERCE DISTRICT IV STAFF MEETING WITH DR. CALLOWAY ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ISSUANCE OF DUPLICATE TAX SALE CERTIFICATE N0, 152 TO EDWARD WADDELL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLLS, COUNTY COURT, MARCH TERM, 1980, IN THE AMOUNTS OF $139.08, $69.24, AND $111.56; AND CIRCUIT COURT, SPRING TERM, 1980, IN THE AMOUNT OF $196.04. THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK: REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, MONTH OF MARCH, 1980. 0 3 aovK 43 _PacE 146 APR 91980 r APR 91980 - - r - _ .... BOOK 43 ,MEW THE BOARD NEXT CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM REGARDING A BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISoiONERS WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach. Florida 3296: April 2, 1980 p MEMO TO: FROM: IN RE: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER Budget Amendment for Community Development and Housing Authority When budgets were considered last August, the Budget fo Community Development was overlooked. Their expenses have been paid so far this fiscal year from funds received for the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program. These funds must be replaced into the Section 8 fund. At the same time the Board has asked the Legislator to crea.te'a-housirig authority for Indian River County which also needs funding. The enclosed' budgets have set Community Development, Section 8 Rental Assistance _and the Housing Authority as one interactive department. The Board will need to authorize a transfer of $42,639 to fund this department. ($24,886 for Community Develop- ment and $17,753 for the Housing Authority) The funds are avail- able in the General Fund as excess unanticipated revenues for County Court Fines. JKB/ksg \ � � |-4:tC �F���, ` 14 ` -21 Iv TI ilk 010 FIL -I T j roc zi 0A A APR APR 91980 WOK 43 wE x.49 FINANCE OFFICER BARTON EXPLAINED THAT THERE WAS AN OVER- SIGHT LAST AUGUST AND A BUDGET WAS NOT SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD TO FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS YEAR. HE CONTINUED THAT AFTER THIS WAS DISCOVERED, THEY CAME UP WITH A BUDGET TO FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, SECTION 8 HOUSING, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1979-80; AND UTILIZE THE SAME PERSONNEL FOR ALL FUNCTIONS. MR. BARTON STATED THAT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WAS FUNDED BACK TO OCTOBER 1, 1979, AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY AS OF APRIL 15, 1980. COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED IF WE WERE CURRENTLY INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND WERE THERE ANY REMAINING FUNDS. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON REPLIED NEGATIVELY AND THAT ALL THE FUNDS HAVE BEEN EXPENDED. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN STATED THAT THE FIRST AND SECOND GRANTS HAVE BEEN AUDITED; AND THE AUDIT FOR THE THIRD GRANT HAS BEEN SENT TO HUD FOR APPROVAL. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT WE ARE NOT INVOLVED IN A PROGRAM IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. COMMISSIONER LOY ADDED WE ARE NOT OPERATING UNDER ANY GRANT AT THIS MOMENT AND THAT IS PART OF THE PROBLEM - THERE ARE NO FUNDS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT WE HAVE A SECTION 8 PROGRAM THAT HAS A PROJECT MANAGER AND A CLERK, AND ALSO A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND A SECRETARY, HE THEN ASKED WHAT THE DIRECTOR IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO BE DOING. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REGAN REPLIED THAT THEY HAVE JUST CLOSED OUT THEIR THIRD GRANT, AND HAVE STARTED UP A SECTION 8 PROGRAM WHICH HAS BEEN SPAWNED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, AND A GOODLY PORTION OF HIS TIME HAS GONE INTO SETTING THAT UP. ALSO, HE ADDED, THE COMMISSION HAS CAUSED THE HOUSING AUTHORITY TO BE DEVELOPED. MR. REGAN SAID THAT IN THE SPRING OF THIS YEAR, HE IS REQUIRED TO DO A HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN (HAP PLAN) IN ORDER TO APPLY FOR GOVERNMENT FUNDING, =0 COMMISSIONER Loy INTERJECTED THAT IF WE DID NOT HAVE A DEPARTMENT TO DO THIS, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WOULD HAVE TO PREPARE THE HAP PLAN. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN STATED HE WOULD BE WORKING WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON THE HAP PLAN; IN ADDITION, THEY CAN REAPPLY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS AND THE APPLICATION WILL PROBABLY FALL DUE IN EARLY SEPTEMBER - THE RESULTS WILL BE KNOWN BY DECEMBER. HE CONTINUED THAT PART OF HIS TIME IS SPENT ON HOUSING AUTHORITY ACTIVITIES, AND A GOOD PIECE OF HIS TIME IS GOING INTO SECTION S - HE IS MOVING BACK AND FORTH ON THE PROGRAMS. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED WE EITHER HAVE TO BE IN THIS BUSINESS OR OUT OF IT, AND THIS IS THE ONLY WAY WE CAN KEEP IN; AND THE UNFORTUNATE PART OF IT IS THAT WE WON'T KNOW IN .JULY ANY MORE THAN WE KNOW NOW. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CONCURRED BUT FELT WE CAN'T EXPEND THAT KIND OF MONEY AND RECEIVE NO FUNDING. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT WHEN BUDGET TIME COMES, NOTHING SHOULD BE FUNDED BEYOND DECEMBER. •COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN NOTED THAT THE DIRECTOR OF HUD ADVISED THAT THERE IS A CERTAIN SAVINGS IN HAVING THE SAME PERSON WORKING IN BOTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING. COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT IT WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO RECEIVE FUNDS IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY PROGRAMS DUE TO THE PRESENT ECONOMIC SITUATION BUT GUESSED WE MUST TRY. HE ADDED THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY EVENTUALLY IS GOING TO BE SELF-SUSTAINING AND HE WAS CONCERNED ABOUT BUILDING SUCH A LARGE STAFF AND THEN NOT GETTING FUNDED. COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGAIN STATED THAT SINCE WE HAVEN'T BEEN FUNDED FOR THE LAST TWO PROGRAMS, AND WITH THE ECONOMY THE WAY IT IS, HE THOUGHT IT WOULD BE AN IMPOSSIBILITY TO GET FUNDING THIS YEAR - IT IS A REAL SHOT IN THE DARK. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE START-UP COST FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY AND FINANCE OFFICER BARTON ADVISED THAT THERE WILL HAVE TO BE AN AUDIT, AND THAT LEGAL, TRAVEL, AND COUNTY SERVICES ARE THE LARGEST ITEMS IN THE PROPOSED BUDGET. APR 91980 7 .SOOK 43 -PAGE150 APR 91980 Boox 43 PAGE 151 COMMISSIONER LOY REPORTED THAT THE BULK OF THE FUND§ ARE TO GET OUR PEOPLE ACQUAINTED WITH THE JOB THAT THEY WERE ASKED TO DO. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THE SECTION S PROGRAM COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN ADVISED THAT IF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY CHOOSES TO TAKE ON SECTION S, THE COMMISSION AGREES TO RELEASE IT, AND IF HUD IS AGREEABLE, IT COULD OCCUR. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN ASKED IF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COULD BE TRANSFERRED TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY MAY BE ABLE TO MAKE A SEPARATE APPLICATION, BUT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IS A COUNTY FUNCTION. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN FELT THAT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WAS AN ARM OF THE COUNTY ACTIVITIES AND IS NOT ONE THAT CAN BE ADEQUATELY SERVICED BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. PROGRAM. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE FUNDS FOR THE SECTION S JOSEPH B. EGAN, III, CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, APPROACHED THE BOARD STATING THAT HUD HAD NOTIFIED THEM THERE ARE 116 UNITS AVAILABLE IN THIS AREA, AND THAT HE THOUGHT THERE WERE TWO ENTITIES CONSIDERING SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS FOR THESE FUNDS. HE CONTINUED THAT THE APPLICATION IS DUE ON THE 15TH AND THERE ARE SEVERAL QUESTIONS IN THE APPLICATION THEY ARE UNABLE TO ANSWER AT THIS TIME; ALSO THERE IS A COOPERATION AGREEMENT PERTAINING TO AD VALOREM TAXATION. MR. EGAN ADVISED THEY HAVE GIVEN THIS MATERIAL TO ATTORNEY COLLINS TO REVIEW AND DISCUSS WITH THE BOARD AT THE NEXT MEETING. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY COULD ASK HUD FOR AN EXTENSION OR SUBMIT ALL THAT THEY HAVE WITH A LETTER STATING THE MISSING ITEMS ARE NOW UNDER ADVISEMENT. MR. EGAN FELT THAT SINCE THIS IS THEIR FIRST TIME AROUND, THEY WANTED TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO HUD ON TIME AS THEY HAVE HEARD THAT THE OTHER APPLICANT IS GOING TO ASK FOR AN EXTENSION. HE THEN SUGGESTED THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE ADMINIS- TRATOR TO WRITE A LETTER TO.HUD STATING THAT THE BOARD HAS DIRECTED THE ATTORNEY TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE APPLICATION BEING SUBMITTED, AND THAT THE ,BOARD WILL DISCUSS IT AT THEIR NEXT MEETING, ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THAT THE AGREEMENT INVOLVES THE COUNTY AGREEING TO SUPPLY WATER, SEWER, LIGHTING, AND ROADS - A MUTUAL COOPERATION SORT OF AN AGREEMENT. HE FELT THAT RATHER THAN TRYING TO MAKE A DECISION NOW, THE ADMINISTRATOR COULD WRITE A LETTER THAT THE BOARD WOULD CONSIDER IT AT THEIR NEXT MEETING; AND THE BOARD WOULD HAVE A DETAILED EXPLANATION OF IT TO STUDY. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT WE SHOULD ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THE ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT TO�REVIEW IT IF WE ARE GOING TO PUT OURSELVES IN A POSITION TO SUPPLY ROADS, ETC. COMMISSIONER LYONS THOUGHT WE SHOULD INDICATE IN THE LETTER THAT WE MUST MAKE IT CONTINGENT UPON THE LOCATION, AS ONE HAS NOT BEEN DESIGNATED AS YET. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY INTENDED TO UTILIZE THE LOAN FUND OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. HE ADDED THERE WERE FUNDS FOR SITE PREPARATION ALSO AVAILABLE. MR. EGAN REPLIED AFFIRMATIVELY, AND EVEN- THOUGH THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY FUNDS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME, HE WOULD WRITE TO THEM TO INDICATE INTEREST IN THEIR FUNDING, HE CONTINUED THAT IF THEY CAN GET INTO THIS PROGRAM, THEN THEY CAN START TO GENERATE THEIR OWN FUNDS, AS THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS DOES NOT HAPPEN ALL THE TIME. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER ADVISED THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY HAS WORKED WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN FORMULATING THEIR APPLICATION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO BE DIRECTED TO WRITE A LETTER TO HUD INDICATING THE BOARD IS GIVING CONSIDERATION TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AND THAT THE BOARD WILL DISCUSS IT AT THEIR NEXT MEETING. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON ADVISED THAT THEY HAVE UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FROM TRAFFIC FUNDS THAT HAS ALREADY EXCEEDED THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR; THEREFORE, HE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE $50,000, RECORD IT APR 91990 9 Bou 43. PAGE 152 APR 91980 Boaz 43 PACE 153 ON THE BOOKS, AND PUT IT IN RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES. HE ADDED THAT HE WOULD THEN LIKE TO TAKE IT FROM THE RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES AND PUT IT INTO ANOTHER FUND; AND SET UP ALL THE LINE ITEMS WITHIN THAT FUND - THERE WOULD BE THREE SEPARATE BUDGET AMENDMENTS, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, SECTION 8, AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY AS OUTLINED IN THE MINUTES. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, FOR THE BOARD TO AUTHORIZE THE BUDGET TRANSFERS AS REQUESTED BY THE FINANCE OFFICER TO FULLY FUND THE THREE BUDGETS THAT WERE JUST APPROVED. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE MOTION WAS FOR APPROVAL OF FUNDS FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND COMMISSIONER Loy STATED IT WAS JUST APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE COUNTY BEING ABLE TO RECOUP THE START-UP COSTS FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BACK TO THE COUNTY COFFER, AND WHETHER OR NOT THESE FUNDS WOULD BE CONSIDERED A LOAN, COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY FUND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY UNTIL THE FIRST OF OCTOBER AND FROM THAT POINT FORWARD, THE BOARD WOULD ANTICIPATE THAT OUR EXPENDED FUNDS WOULD BE RETURNED. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. THE BUDGET AMENDMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: FUND 001 ADJUSTMENTS ACcouNT No. DEBIT CREDIT 001-199-513-99-91 $50,000 001-000-341-54-00 $50,000 001-199-513-99-91 $42,639 001-199-581-99-10 $42,639 10 � ® i FUND 108 ADJUSTMENTS - REVENUE ACCOUNT N0, DEBIT CREDIT 108-000-381-20-00 $42,639 108-000-331-64-00 47,272 108-000-349-09-00 4,000 108-000-389-40-00 50,446 108-222-564-99-91 $144,357 FUND 108 ADJUSTMENTS - ExPENSE ACCOUNT N0. DEBIT CREDIT 108-222-564-11-12 $21,700 108-225-569-11-12 21,673 108-226-554-11-12 6,777 108-222-564-12-11 1,331 108-225-569-12-11 1,329 108-226-554-12-11 416 108-222-564-12-12 1,975 108-225-569-12-12 1,973 108-226-554-12-12 617 108-222-564-12-13 2,031 108-225-569-12-13 1,566 108-226-554-12-13 465 108-222-564-12-14 105 108-225-569-12-14 105 108-226-554-12-14 33 108-222-564-33-11 - 108-226-554-33-11 3,500 108-222-564-33-19 - 108-225-569-34-02 500 108-226-554-34-02 2,300 108-222-564-34-02 700 108-222-564-34-11 1,000 108-225-569-34-11 540 108-226-554-34-11 700 108-222-564-35-11 200 11 APR 91980 BOOK 4.3 PACE 154 FUND 108 ADJUSTMENTS — EXPENSE, CONTINUED ACCOUNT NO, DEBIT 108-225-569-35-11 $ 200 108-226-554-35-11 500 108-222-564-34-72 108-225-569-34-72 108-226-554-34-72 108-222-564-35-15 108-225-569-35-15 108-226-554-35-15 108-222-564-34-21 108-225-569-34-21 108-226-554-34-21 108-222-564-34-64 108-222-564-34-63 108-225-569-34-63 108-226-554-34-63 108-222-564-34-51 108-222-564-34-54 108-226-554-34-54 108-222-564-35-21 108-222-564-34-91 108-225-569-34-91 108-226-554-34-91 108-225-569-34-01 108-226-554-34-01 108-222_564-34-43 108-222-564-34-99 108-225-569-34-99 108-226-554-34-99 108-222-564-36-73 108-222-564-33-49 108-222-564-33-21 108-226-554-33-21 100 50 200 275 210 65 150 125 75 550 150 65 55 350 150 1.1000 1,100 200 100 250 500 2,200 400 100 100 35,200 4,000 1,200 1, 200 Boox 43 PAGE 55 CREDIT FUND 108 ADJUSTMENTS - EXPENSE, CQNTJtUED ACCOUNT NO. DEBIT 108-222-564-66-41 $ 1,722 108-222-564-34-03 - 108-222-564-66-49 - 108-222-564-99-92 .19,779 108-222-564-66-42 - 108-222-564-34-39 500 108-222-564-99-91 CREDIT $144,357 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECESSED AND RECONVENED AS THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT. 13 8VVK 43 PAGE �V\Jr K 4 3 PAUL 157 APRIL 9, 1980 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ACTING AS THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT MET AT THE COURTHOUSE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, AT 9:20 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.; R. DON DEESON; AND PATRICK B. LYONS. ALSO PRESENT WERE JACK G. .JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; .JEFFREY BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; AND JANICE W. CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERK. THE BOARD THEN DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING LETTERS AND SKETCH CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL LIGHTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT: April 1, 1980 MEMO TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: �� JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER IN RE: Additional Street Lights for Laurelwood Street Lighting District Laurelwood Street Lighting District needs approval for an additional 11 street lights. Please see the attached letter from Mr. Peter G. Robinson of Laurel Homes requesting the street lights. The Laurelwood Street Lighting District will contribute the additional $800 for the next eight months which represents the additional costs for the balance of the year. Upon approval from the Board of County Commissioners Mr. Art Walker of Florida Power and Light Company needs a letter of authorization to initiate the installation of the lights. JKB/ksg attachment 14 � ® r P.O. BOX 2082 VERO BEACH FLORIDA 32960 TELEP40NE (305) 569-5061 March 17, 1980 a Laurelwood Street Lighting Dist. Indian River County Board of Commissioners 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Reference: Street Lighting Laurelwood Unit III Dear Jeff: Laurel Builders, Inc. would like to request that 11 streetlights be installed per the attached sketch in Laurelwood Unit III. Ove would like the county to request that 11 - 4500 Lumen 1111ercury Vapor street lights be installed on concrete poles. It ?f� understanding from Art Walker with Florida Power & Light that if authorized by the Streetlighting Board these lights would be installed when the other electrical lines are installed in Laurelwood. Once again, since this will cause a short term budgeting deficit for the district, Laurel Builders will make up the difference in cost between the budget and the actual costs PG R/o j Very Truly Yours Peter G. Robinson Vice President kmm SPR 91990 �ooK 43 ?AGEM-11 o. ,e t.►.1 w ; „ 68 Se 5�^_` 685 � �`* ,66 � 1 CA 1 s -meet l ieA %' (if iatric-)) 1 16%9 /70 41AO s 4 „e.� ,LZ_. a .r59 vdr ac.orrs0 `2. f4Lav-. ♦E-C'o.+•nsi cJ' rrac,:9 _..�-1 e^y+ .-i i - ' � c `'• a.cz-s.•v A .� � ,,,.:.r4•. r�,,,y;�3tee,.�n rlt rl38 a®1vB '/•4w>•4nm..a'�`c> i• a.ta' !.•;>.n Bc.,nma-p Tiou S-^.-. ;Jn+.-r Xr• :=cr_nl, .v1 c,..,0 ,•>e .s.v Ca -•'•sr crr �\. r • _ t n., wr'i 6r o � S99'3r"a4 t' 1 � ..; , rr f.av<4 r..r 99 7 y9' 4ssr i /JB - ,# _ SL +/ 'IQ P� _ . /.r ♦i. .. .. !!.'4. •... is .gip• _ o cn-27_ .J r ... L'oI ldl, [wvi.1.•ua+r/ / .or r-wrs In m♦F a �'• 1/ /.cr•Y `.�:1"° I -�` �• _ ._�ir V 4! oQJ 7- o : s wcar��r �:ri...ns-.',. ij� .,. X13 •,�i 'ii �' 1" .: '+ fir to i3vu• 4 ' 32 /3/ /46,. '1: i� >30 !29 ° /PQ p 2 p •4 j .• o !S7 r - �, Q +'� r r.!� \ `io.c• t 2020 2490 2470 2450 2430 2410 ji ik3so `i ifs i �' , ++'... 0 •a,. ^�I� + yA D�,/!�_sa oo- se aJid . >o w...l.��se �v . yy;I • . e5� s/s•�a r .STt?E o e 4 tij ' n 1 tg /SE i ++ ^.j� ' �rZ?r6.9.•?0'_•_•r_�,_O•„ t'.•• • :pa•:w :... `:.S. .., .:.: r..•r11�. vt :aB .D.:.�oom_Ce . ar' it �•oshyr/y di s Cw,•�,•�-!r1_!s`:/9.%-,....;S. a . ,::•i�ti,'°I, s. v t o/a4 s4I.�+^)♦ra°m'r•,raj :9r// +.- Ga;4 'i,.r ^-'/93-'- 4 .__`-..' _..., `rw4,RI• a{.'—.S.0ri Pp`�,3or,',.s . 103�j �.�•`• •^:,:a_f_-_ ..*'_.•.•.�.-.`.,'v _r_ j i'+` iao •IIao 2525 241.5 2433 241$ fr1 .-L U/9k�195 c 0 s�♦'Lv. x�p/rLC7: .i. •/II v? ® 6"'• S73P`E7� + �``..1, 0 � .' .t e •_ eu�sr-:r;>.:_w .:o^ 's,,__s_.,,,,,,•Y�'s>.ry .,�.•,r1 sea►+.r-.r r /.• /- r 2® - W _,__._ 1 " ,v Sd3'SB rJ`w t .x.: t- � • a'c: 00 L� •y 2895 '{ � ^•.� • / s � / - ` �,T:. r � ,� ..:.. - r' t.r..rovr /•�:..-.• •i• - S.�'..1.".Q:-� �e A L O O 't E. vsc v �%Bos .. er.ar Y h ' �"w a iv.? f� •..• `.�• ••v ._ t4?' i Z = t7S /34 140 L' ,iy i + �� o : ' r • ... $ ti c• -'°tea f Ia ■+ 'v oy-44. 2450 • STREET iDDRE45 , w l.'b � �I � �/".'.9 ,'� - i�c? N !+2k ,Oy /d% ±ia rjB� �1 • � n� �i . t l,�.s•>.,:"�. .1lY.:oa ro _� � :� ts►•sa to•w +. ,. 3.¢a.�^�•x w•1 * vi�'r:;a .s r=''? a>:ai �; :.o t; a.: s•.,�_. a/,o ::o .>Jo t o �? i t• !3 p • a .99 ,man• �,'.. •y 10, > . o a R c ♦I „ 0-4', 6A G7•:^r ;.t> i ."r,•_Qtf;re .•,.. 2530 2620 2590 4+♦ 2550 ••e' ra •. `_� �.- rw - P® i , gra �%� a •. �:•s�`.^ —tri C` ,9�-fJ/'.a l:. _'�.yl • .l • � J•3w •n :a. I ;V •• �,r•� •'! lv • '4 7,f • !QT i � � . �i/.� ,., i ..,`.r'•ra �B 4_.-. •A,� . S'/^ :�'T 1�ET---�(•eo' f-7i'��.�� h . `'"• • ' ,g'�r/'' es ss rfq ZE S e�• 2635 Tom_: 1,'J. 2595 2575 ZS55S.{14y' t• t,''{• `;. t.. 29t0 . i. t JA s.•r ♦;R �,,, .'Be<: .� d 1 e !74 � x� Bim' `•°' r4r fFP ' I t rF3 _ �...F,i t �: t03 ' - W v-av"-�'� .tin9•J4t/'h '-----._._ ®7i .Q' .•S' i• d T9 '� •.._9 .:..>.e•N i 1 1 1 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT TO INSTALL THE 11 STREET LIGHTS AS INDICATED IN THE LETTERS DATED MARCH 17TH AND APRIL 1ST, AND THE SKETCH SUBMITTED BY LAUREL HOMES, WHICH HAVE BEEN MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT ADJOURNED AT 9:25 O'CLOCK A.M. ATTEST: CLERK CHAIRMAN 17 BOOK 43 PAGE 160 APR 91990 --APR 91980 - - _ BOK 43 PAGE 161 THE HOUR OF 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSE'D, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in11Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being _ r t..— a t in the matter of?/ in the - Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before mA this `,t! day of ^ fie( 'A. D. Manager) uft, Indian River County, Florida) NOTICE OF HEARING' The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, will convene on the 9th day of April, 1980, at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of County Commissioners Room at the Indian River County Courthouse, Indian River County, Vero Beach, Florida, to consider granting an assignment of Franchise to Florida Atlantic Associates. Said assignment to affect the delivery of water'and sewer ,service to the following described property in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: Tracts d and 5, Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 39 East; Tract 13, Section 31, Township 32 South, Range 39 East; ALSO Tract 3 and the East 20 acres of Tract 6, and the North 528 feel of the East 10.265 acres of the West 20.53 acres of Tract 6, Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, according to the Indian River Farms Company Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 25, St. Lucie County, Florida, now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida, less , right! -of -way and reservations of record.. A rate scheduled will be adopted by the County providing for the following user rates: WATER'- RATE First 2,000 gallons $7.10 per month — minimum All over 2,000 gallons $1.50 per 1,000 gallons SEWER RATE ;Residential $7.50 per month per single family dwelling i Parties in interest and citizens will be heard by ,the Board at said Public hearing. This 9th day of April,1980. Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, Florida W. W. Siebert, Chairman Mar. 12, 14,1980. ATTORNEY GORDON B. .JOHNSTON, REPRESENTING FLORIDA ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES DBA VILLAGE GREEN, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND COMMENTED THAT HE IS NOT REQUESTING A NEW FRANCHISE, JUST AN EXTENSION OF A SERVICE AREA. HE THEN PRESENTED SEVERAL RETURN RECEIPTS FOR THE RECORD WHICH WERE SENT TO THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS, WHICH WILL BE KEPT ON FILE IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. HE FELT THEY HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL THE REQUESTS OF THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT. W (Clerk of the Circuit (SEAL) - Manager) uft, Indian River County, Florida) NOTICE OF HEARING' The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, will convene on the 9th day of April, 1980, at 9:00 a.m., in the Board of County Commissioners Room at the Indian River County Courthouse, Indian River County, Vero Beach, Florida, to consider granting an assignment of Franchise to Florida Atlantic Associates. Said assignment to affect the delivery of water'and sewer ,service to the following described property in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: Tracts d and 5, Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 39 East; Tract 13, Section 31, Township 32 South, Range 39 East; ALSO Tract 3 and the East 20 acres of Tract 6, and the North 528 feel of the East 10.265 acres of the West 20.53 acres of Tract 6, Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, according to the Indian River Farms Company Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 25, St. Lucie County, Florida, now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida, less , right! -of -way and reservations of record.. A rate scheduled will be adopted by the County providing for the following user rates: WATER'- RATE First 2,000 gallons $7.10 per month — minimum All over 2,000 gallons $1.50 per 1,000 gallons SEWER RATE ;Residential $7.50 per month per single family dwelling i Parties in interest and citizens will be heard by ,the Board at said Public hearing. This 9th day of April,1980. Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, Florida W. W. Siebert, Chairman Mar. 12, 14,1980. ATTORNEY GORDON B. .JOHNSTON, REPRESENTING FLORIDA ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES DBA VILLAGE GREEN, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND COMMENTED THAT HE IS NOT REQUESTING A NEW FRANCHISE, JUST AN EXTENSION OF A SERVICE AREA. HE THEN PRESENTED SEVERAL RETURN RECEIPTS FOR THE RECORD WHICH WERE SENT TO THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS, WHICH WILL BE KEPT ON FILE IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. HE FELT THEY HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL THE REQUESTS OF THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT. W ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT HE HAS HAD AN EXTENSIVE MEETING WITH THEM,AND THE DEVELOPER HAS BEEN MOST COOPERATIVE AND IS PROVIDING ASSURANCE FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE. HE THEN RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION. UTILITIES DIRECTOR LINER CONCURRED WITH ATTORNEY COLLINS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THERE MAS ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT A RATE CHANGE. ATTORNEY .JOHNSTON EXPLAINED THAT THERE IS NO ACTUAL RATE CHARGED TO THE CUSTOMER - THE DEVELOPER INCLUDES IT IN HIS RENTAL FEE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO START CHARGING EXTRA TO THE TENANTS,AND ATTORNEY .JOHNSTON REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE AGREEMENTS THAT INDICATE THE DEVELOPER CANNOT DO THIS. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT IF THE TENANT COULD PROVE THAT THE RENT RECEIVED BY THE DEVELOPER INCLUDED A CHARGE THAT EXCEEDED THE AMOUNT LISTED IN THE FRANCHISE, HE COULD OBJECT AS IT COULD NOT EXCEED THE RATE THE BOARD IS ESTABLISHING HERE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT IF THE DEVELOPER WOULD HAVE A RIGHT TO CHARGE A HIGHER RATE, THE TENANTS LIVING, THERE WOULD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT HE LOOKED AT THE RATES AS BEING A SAFEGUARD FOR THE TENANTS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED - RESOLUTION N0. 80-33 AUTHORIZING THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE WATER AND SEWER FRANCHISE TO FLORIDA ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, ESTABLISHING THE RATES AND APPROVING THE EXPANSION AS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT AND AS APPROVED BY THE VARIOUS COUNTY DEPARTMENTS. 19 BOOK 43 `PAGE'M-4 APR 9 1980 r APR 91990 WK, 43 PAcE163 RESOLUTION NO. 80-33 WHEIRI?AS, this Board heretofore did grant a water and sewer franchise to Earl Croth and C. Reed Knight, said franchise being known as the Village Creon Water and Sewer Franchise; and W'HERE'AS, said franchise was subsequently transferred and assigned to Florida Mobile home Communities, Inc.; and W'HE'REAS, pursuant to Section 1:3 of said franchise, a request was received for transfer and a5sig11111C11t of said franchise to l lorida Atlantic Associates; and WHEREAS, publication of a Notice of Public Ilearing was duly made; and W l IE -REAS, this Boa rd did on April 9, 1980 hold a public hea ring; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY 1.1 -IE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the water and sewer franchise, being Resolution No. 73 -82, previously issued to Earl Croth and C. Reed Knight and subsequently transferred and assigned to Florida Mobile I lomc Communities, Inc. , being Resolution No. 78 -65, be and the same is hereby transferred and assigned to Florida Atlantic Associates and said water and sewer franchise shall include the following terms: 1. The service area of said franchise shall include the following described property: Tracts 4 and 5, Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 39 East; Tract 1:3, Section 31, Township 32 South, Range 39 East; also Tract 3 and the East 20 acres of Tract 6, and the North 528 feet of the East 10.265 acres of the West 20.53 acres of Tract 6, Section 6, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, according to the Indian River I-arnis Company Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 25, St. Lucie Comity, Florida, now lying and being in hldian River County, Florida, less rights of ways and reservations of record. 2. The rate schedule shall be changed and amended to provide for the following user rates: WATER RATE Residential First 2,000 gallons $7.10 per month - minimum All over 2,000 gallons $1.50 per 1,000 gallons SI.W'Elt 1ZAj-1 Residential $7. 50 per month per single family_ dwelling � � r Mp 3. I'Ill: MOBII.1? IIOML?S L.O(:ATl`t) N'CCHIN "I'lIL' SL'ltVlCl: ARI A SHALL NEVER BE INDIVIDUALLY METERLD LURING '1'I E TERNI OF `1'I IIS FRA N C I IISL. 4. Florida Atlantic Associates agrees to pay to the County, as a future hook-up charge into the County'-, master water system, a paynient in the amount of $1,000.00 her month until such time as said a1110n1I1t shall reach a total of $25,000.00. The County will establish all interest -hearing; Passbook account and will deposit said Payments into said account holclin said funds until such time as the County is in a position to supply water services to the franchised area. The interest. earned on said account shall be paid quarterly to Florida Atlantic Associates. The parties agree that the account shall be in the County's name and shall he held under the following conditions: (a) At any time that the County shall acquire its own water- distribution system, and shall furnish water services to individual customers, all sums of money rc111alning in said account shall becoirlc the absolute property of the County my and Florida Atlantic Associates shall relinquish all rights thereto. The $25,000.00 figure: was based on the claim of the developer of 113 gallons Per day per residential unit. Should experience indicate a higher flow demand, this escrow amount shall be supplemented based on the flow demand formula of $200/FRC X Peak average demand prior 300/GPD/EEC to connecting to the County System. 5. Florida Atlantic Associates agrees to pay to County the sum of $500.00 per month for a maintenance account until such suns reaches the sum of $30, 000.00. Said account shall be an interest -bea ring account With interest paid quarterly to Florida Atlantic Associates. Said funds shall be used as a sinking fund and applied only for repairs and;'or replacement of the water systems as the need arises. CoU11ty is granted the right to make necessary repairs using said fund in the event of default on the part of Florida Atlantic Associates in maintaining the quality standards established in this franchise. Florida Atlantic Associates also agrees that the cost of a meter at such time as the County provides water services to the franchise area may be taken out of this fund. 6. The franchise and rights herein granted shall take effect and be in force from and after the tinge of the adOPti011 of this resolution by the Board and shall continue in force and effect until such time as the County may install or acquire its own sewage collection and treatment system and/or water supply and distribution system and supplies the same to individual customers at which time, the owner will convey all of its watet and/or sewer facilities (except for sewer treatment plant, water plant and plant sites) and easements for location of same as owners may o\tin, free and clear of all liens or mortgages, to said County, without charge. BOARI? OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OV INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. By la 1 rnla n Attest: Cle rk -2 - GQ!'DON R. 11(117., '!'.''4, Ll,,X.. 0 ...\,1i aooK 43 PAc��6���. APR 9190 Boa 43 PAGE165 nrrr.nrrANTrr The undersigned hereby accepts the foregoing Resolution and the fran.chise, transferred by this Resolution and for themselves, their suc- cessors and assigns, do hereby covenant and agree to comply with and abide by all of the items, conditions and provisions set forth in said franchise as amended. Dated this ' `�` day of , 1980. FLORIDA ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES By FI.ORIPA MOBILF. HOMF. C(>T'NUNITIFS, INC. By ti Donald W. Freeman, President .f s Attest: c iar Sills, s, ecreta- I .y THE BOARD NEXT TOOK UP THE MATTERS ITEMIZED IN THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM J. RALPH LUNDY, PRESIDENT OF THE GIFFORD PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE: " Gunn PROGRESSIvE CIV LEAGUE President J. Ralph Lundy 4520 38th Avenue Irero Beach, Florida 32960 To: The Beard of Count; Commissioners. ., Indian River County = �', ,C�Passr�U Aero Beach, Florida 32960 rA 1i Ilonorable W. W. Seibert, Chairman ,°- �Jh,�s+qtr.✓' Dear Commissioners: - --- The Gifford Progressive Civic League is requesting to be placed on the agenda of your next meeting, possibly the meeting.in March 1980, or at your second meeting in the month. The Civic League would like to discuss several matters of impor- tance to the league and the citizenry of Gifford. Among the items we plan to call to your attention are as follows: 1. The future of the Ciff ord Park (What is needed and how you can help) our progress and our goals. 2. The league is asking permission to lease the little vacant building formerly used as the Urban Develop- ment Office, with the understanding that the league will be responsible for upkeep and utility bills. .t, . The traffic light problerns in Gifford. 4. Speed limits along Nortlh Gifford. :Road during certain hours. 5. Rumble strips for 43rd Avenin at South Gifford Road. The league will be represented by President J. Relph Lundy, Mrs,, Walter Jackson or Ronald Ybun,,. We will appreciate your approval and an early reply. eSpec ully, -u' �Gif` ord rogressiz Civic fileague i. Ralph Lundy, Presiden r APR 91980 aoox 43 PAu l67 MR. LUNDY APPROACHED THE BOARD AND EXPRESSED DEEP APPRECIATION ON BEHALF OF THE GIFFORD PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE FOR ALL THE ACCOMPLISHMENTS MADE POSSIBLE BY THE BOARD IN THE PAST FEW YEARS, AND THE LEAGUE WANTED TO "PIN FLOWERS" ON THE RETIRING MEMBERS OF THE BOARD. HE CONTINUED THAT THIS BOARD HAS BEEN CONCERNED AND HAS SHOWN A WILLINGNESS TO HELP PEOPLE THAT NEEDED HELP; AND COMMENDED THE BOARD FOR THEIR EFFORTS IN WORKING WITH THEIR COMMUNITY. MR. LUNDY APPEALED TO THE BOARD TO HELP THEM COMPLETE WHAT THEY HAVE STARTED AT GIFFORD PARK, AS THERE IS STILL A LOT OF WORK TO BE DONE AND THEY ARE STILL WAITING FOR SEVERAL THINGS TO BE DONE THAT WERE REQUESTED LAST FALL, SUCH AS THE DISKING OF THE BASEBALL FIELD. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY ARE ALSO TRYING TO DEVELOP AN AREA FOR THE ELDERLY CITIZENS, AND THROUGH THE HELP OF SOME ORGANIZATIONS AND CETA WORKERS, THEY WERE ABLE TO POUR THE PAVEMENT FOR THE SHUFFLEBOARD COURT AND PLANT SOME FLOWERS. MR. LUNDY REPORTED THAT THEY FULFILLED THEIR PART OF THE AGREEMENT MADE WITH THE BOARD BY WORKING WITH CHURCHES AND VARIOUS GROUPS IN THE COMMUNITY TO BUILD A FENCE FOR THE TENNIS COURT, BUT THEY WERE ONLY ABLE TO CONSTRUCT TWO SIDES OF THE FENCE. HE CONTINUED THEY ARE NOW WORRIED THE TENNIS COURT WILL DETERIORATE BECAUSE IT IS NOT BEING USED SINCE THE FENCE IS NOT COMPLETED. MR. LUNDY SAID THAT SOME CITIZENS ARE DISAPPOINTED AS THEY FEEL THEY HAVE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE COUNTY WILL BE HELPING IN ANY WAY. COMMENTS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR HIS ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE THEY HAVE USED SINCE MR. REGAN BECAME THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOP- MENT IS THAT EVERYTHING MR. REGAN APPROVES AND REQUESTS IS FURNISHED BY THE ADMINISTRATORS DEPARTMENT. HE NOTED THAT HE DOES NOT RECALL RECEIVING ANY REQUESTS FROM MR. REGAN IN THE PAST SIX MONTHS. THE BOARD DECIDED TO DEFER THIS PORTION OF THE CONVER- SATION UNTIL MR. REGAN COULD BE PRESENT. 24 MR. LUNDY ASKED PERMISSION TO LEASE THE BUILDING FORMERLY USED AS THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, AS OUTLINED IN HIS LETTER. HE FELT THEY COULD USE THE BUILDING FOR STORAGE OF THE LEAGUE'S EQUIPMENT. UTILITIES DIRECTOR LINER COMMENTED THAT THEY HAD NO PLANS TO USE THAT BUILDING. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE BIDDING PROCEDURE AND THE ATTORNEY ADVISED IF THEY PLANNED TO USE THE BUILDING JUST FOR A SHORT TIME, THERE WAS NO REASON TO BID. THE ATTORNEY COMMENTED THAT INSURANCE WOULD BE A NEGOTIABLE ITEM. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THE COST OF INSURANCE AND MAINTENANCE SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE GIFFORD PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE, COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP A CONTRACT TO LET THE LEAGUE UTILIZE THE BUILDING FOR ONE YEAR. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THE BUILDING WILL BE USED FOR PARK - RELATED AND OFFICE FUNCTIONS, BUT NOT FOR A MEETING PLACE FOR THE LEAGUE. HE THEN DIRECTED THE ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP A PROPOSED USE AGREEMENT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT MAINTENANCE AND INSURANCE WILL BE BORNE BY THE CIVIC LEAGUE. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED ITEM 3 IN MR. LUNDY'S LETTER PERTAINING TO THE TRAFFIC LIGHT PROBLEMS IN GIFFORD. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ADVISED THAT THE LIGHT IN QUESTION WOULD BE TAKEN DOWN, AND ALSO REQUESTED THAT A LIGHT WOULD BE PUT UP ON THE CORNER OF KINGS HIGHWAY AND STATE ROAD 60. COMMISSIONER LOY ADVISED THAT PUTTING UP THE NEW LIGHT IS ON THE PRIORITY LIST, AS ANYTHING THAT IS GOING TO BE DONE WILL HAVE TO BE DONE BY THE BOARD AS THE STATE HAS NO FUNDS FOR IT. DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT DEACTIVATING THE LIGHT. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ADVISED THE COUNTY HAS NO AUTHORITY THERE AS IT IS A STATE ROAD, BUT SINCE THEY HAVE PERMISSION TO TAKE IT DOWN, THEY CAN TAKE THS MATTER OF DEACTIVATING IT UP WITH THE DOT, 25 APR 91980 - . - - -BOOK 43PAGEl68 APR 9 ig$o - - - -"BOOK 43 PAGE169 ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ADVISED THEY HAVE ALREADY SET IN MOTION THE PLANS TO TAKE THE LIdHT DOWN AT N0. GIFFORD RD. & U.S. I AND THEY HAVE PERMISSION TO PUT ONE UP AT KINGS HIGHWAY & STATE -ROAD 60 BUT THE MONEY IS NOW THE PROBLEM; THEREFORE, THIS HAS BEEN PUT ON A PRIORITY BASIS. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT THE CONSENSUS OF OPINION IS THAT THE LIGHT UNDER DISCUSSION HAS CAUSED MORE CONFUSION AND ACCIDENTS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INTERJECTED THAT THE LIGHT IS JUST A SCHOOL CROSSING LIGHT AND IS NOT LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION. MR. LUNDY BROUGHT UP ITEM 4 IN HIS LETTER REGARDING SPEED LIMITS ALONG NORTH GIFFORD ROAD AND SUGGESTED THAT THE SPEED LIMIT BE REDUCED AND ENFORCED, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED THEY WRITE A LETTER TO THE SHERIFF CONCERNING ENFORCEMENT OF THE SPEED LIMIT. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THEY HAVE REDUCED THE SPEED LIMIT THERE FROM 45 TO 35 MPH AND PUT IN A SCHOOL CROSSING. THE LAST ITEM IN MR. LUNDY'S LETTER REGARDING RUMBLE STRIPS FOR 43RD AVENUE AND SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD WAS DISCUSSED, AND MR. LUNDY REPORTED THAT THREE DEATHS AND MANY NARROW ESCAPES HAVE OCCURRED AT THAT INTERSECTION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INSTRUCTED THE ADMINISTRATORS OFFICE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE INTERSECTION AND COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION. THE BOARD"THEN RETURNED TO THE DISCUSSION ABOUT GIFFORD PARK AND ASKED COMMUNITY -DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN FOR HIS COMMENTS. COMMUNITY( DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN ADVISED THAT HE HAD BEEN OUT TO THE PARK RECENTLY AND THERE IS A FENCE THERE, BUT NOT ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF THE TENNIS COURT - THIS IS AN INVITATION FOR SOMEONE TO DRIVE THEIR CAR OR TRUCK OVER THE COURT. AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, IT WAS DETERMINED THE FENCE WAS NEEDED FOR SECURITY AS MR. LUNDY REPORTED SOMEONE WAS FOUND ON THE TENNIS COURT WITH THEIR CAR DOING SOME REPAIR WORK. 26 MR. L.UNDY NOTED THAT ORIGINALLY THE BOARD DID NOT AUTHORIZE THE FENCE FOR THE TENNIS COURT TO BE BUILT; THE LEAGUE SAID THEY WOULD GO AS FAR AS THEY POSSIBLY COULD IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FENCE, THEREFORE, THEY ARE APPEALING TO THE BOARD TO HELP THEM COMPLETE WHAT THEY HAVE STARTED. COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT DIRECTOR REGAN GIVE THE BOARD A RECOMMENDATION OF WHAT HAS TO BE DONE AT GIFFORD PARK, ALONG WITH THE COST. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN STATED HE WOULD CONSIDER THE TENNIS COURT, THE BASEBALL FIELD,- DISKING, AND THE FILL IN ORDER FOR THE PARK TO BE UTILIZED. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ASKED DIRECTOR REGAIN IF HE HAD MADE A REQUEST FOR A BULLDOZER OR FILL THAT HIS DEPARTMENT HAS NOT FOLLOWED THROUGH ON OR COMPLETED. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REGAN REPLIED NEGATIVELY AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE HAD BEEN REMISS AS MR. LUNDY DID REQUEST FILL BEFORE HURRICANE DAVID OCCURRED BUT HE DID NOT FOLLOW THROUGH, AS HE BECAME INVOLVED IN OTHER MATTERS. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REITERATED THAT ALL REQUESTS ARE TAKEN CARE OF AS SOON AS THEY ARE RECEIVED IN HIS OFFICE. CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR LEE NUZIE CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO DISCUSS HIS REQUEST TO PURCHASE EQUIPMENT WHICH HE CONSIDERS VITAL TO THE EFFICIENT OPERATION OF HIS DEPARTMENT AS PER HIS LETTER OF MARCH 13, 1980, WHICH FOLLOWS: 27 =4 I BOOK 4d 'PAGE 170 APR 91980 - Y _ -BOOK 43 PAGE 171 March 13, 1980` The Honorable W.W. Siebert Chairman B° .�ivCD Board of County Commissioners ca°°j!'titr Indian River County Court House FP `;. Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pear Bunny: Usually when you receive a letter from a member of oux, county department, it is a request for something. This letter is no exception to the rule. It is an accepted fact that Indian River County fared pretty well during the episode of Hurricane David. In spite of the fact that there teras much property damage, there were no deaths or significant injuries. One explanation that I might tender is that our communications system stood us in good stead. However, we should be better prepared for a storm in high categories than Hurricane David which was considered a Category 1 Storm. Our rapidly increasing population (at present 58,000 plus) dictates preparations along this vein. I'm referring to improvements in our communication systems and weather indication devices. For the past few years, the Indian River County Civil Defense Department has budgeted $750.00 towards a radio alert system. This would. include an encoder with receivers for all the emergency response. -activities. This system is needed. It would fac.il'icate an efficient and time saving response to emergencies. _However, I'have not really initiated any definite moves in this -dive ction as yet, since matching funds are not available. I am optimistic that the situation will reverse itself aftt.-P this fiscal year and will then pursue this issue. But, I have been -testing a new type of pager. This device permits anyone to contact me at anytime (24 hours a cavi merely by lifting up a telephone and dialing a certain number. The beeper is then activated and will communicate a 20 second massage to the carrier. The heads of the emergency response e groups have indicated that this would be an effective method of staying in contact with the local Civil Defense Director. In other words, anyone with telephone service could immediately be in contact with the carrier of the beeper. The beeper / beeps and the voice message follows. The cost of one of these beepers is $275.00 (this includes $25.00 for inz--ranee on the device,). There is a $14.00 monthly charge for the encoder which is controlled b;,- the answering service. At present, I would be satisfied with the availability of one beeper. If the Board of Commissioners should decide I need two, this decision would not be objectionable. The other matter I wish to address at this time is in regards to an anemometer. On February 19th, I awoke at 6 A.M. and was advised by the radio that Vero Beach was experiencing winds with a velocity of 35 miles per hour. However, when I drove to the office it was very apparent that the winds were of a greater velocity and more exaggerated in some areas. In my opinion, I had determined that we were experiencing winds of at least 60 miles per hour. I tried to confirm this opinion by checking with the FAA. However, their phones were not operable. The National Weather Service at Daytona, con- tacted me and would have appreciated definite data in regards to the wind velocity. This service stands by to help us disseminate adverse weather conditions to the general public. In spite of the fact that I was not able to avail myself of the pertinent information, I activated the Civil Defense staff and alerted the school system, governmental agencies, and emergency response groups to the fact that we were experiencing some unusual weather conditions. If we had our own anemometer we would have confirmed our weather determinations. Such an - instrument is very much needed in disaster preparedness. It is time consuming trying to obtain necessary information from another activity - particularly, if the telephone system is not operable. An anemometer would also present atmospheric pressure readings. During the Hurricane David episode, this staff's decisions were guided by the changes in atmospheric pressures. When the pressure dropped alarmingly, we were convinced that certain d actions had to be effected. This weather data plus the wind velocity factors makes this type of instrument essential to our preparedness program. The Daytona National. Weather Service &'--o has concurred in regards to the need for having such immediate reliable weather information. A Heathkit Weather Computer kit can be obtained for $383.90. The staff has the expertise to assemble this kit, thereby saving $111.10. It would be most comforting to have this Electronic Weatherman instrument to furnish "instant, accurate past, present, and future weather data." At this stage, I know the prominent question is whether Civil Defense is budgeted for this equipment. On December 6, 1979 the State forwarded a check to this department in the amount of $820.23. I understand from the Finance Department that this is available for Civil Defense use since this sum of money was extracted from the 1979 Civil Defense budget to fund the CETA program during September. This program was supervised by Civil Defense and included the workers hired to assist the various communities in the clean-up phase after Hurricane David. Furthermore, the radio alert communication system was budgeted for $750.00 and which will not be effected this year. I trust that the Indian River County Board of Commissioners will approve the purchases of a beeper and the Heathkit Digital Weather Computer. Very si rely, S. Lee Nuzie, Director 1 , I BOOK " 43PAGE,1,72-• _I BOOK 43 PacE 173 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEZV-ED A LETTER FROM PETE NOEL, NEWS DIRECTOR OF WGYL RADIO STATION, IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST FOR THE HEATHKIT WEATHER INFORMATION CENTER. COMMISSIONER LYONS INQUIRED IF THERE IS ENOUGH IN.THE BUDGET FOR THESE PURCHASES, AND MR. NUZIE STATED THAT THERE IS. HE THEN WENT ON TO DISCUSS THE NEED FOR AN ENCODER SYSTEM, NOTING THAT IT TAKES QUITE A BIT OF TIME TO NOTIFY ALL THOSE WHO SHOULD BE ALERTED OF IMPENDING TORNADOS, ETC., AND HE PRESENTLY ONLY HAS HIS SECRETARY WHO HAS TO CALL ALL THOSE SET OUT ON THEIR PRIORITY LIST. AN ENCODER HAS ABOUT 50 OUTLETS AND THIS NOTIFICATION COULD BE SENT OUT TO ALL AT ONCE. MR. NUZIE EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD BEEN HOPING FOR MATCHING FUNDS FROM THE STATE FOR THIS PURPOSE, BUT THEY HAVEN IT BEEN AVAILABLE FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS AND IF WE DO NOT HAVE MATCHING FUNDS IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR, HE FELT WE MUST GET SUCH A SYSTEM ON OUR OWN, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE PURCHASE OF A BEEPER AND A HEATHKIT WEATHER COMPUTER KIT AS OUTLINED IN MR. NUZIE`S LETTER OF MARCH 13, 1980 AND APPROVED A BUDGET AMENDMENT ALLOCATING FUNDS FOR THIS PURCHASE AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT N0. INCREASE DECREASE OTHER MACH. & EQUIPMENT 102-208-525-66.49 $400.00 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 102-199-584-99-91 $400.00 CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR NUZIE NEXT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE FELT IT WOULD BE VERY WORTHWHILE FOR THE PLANNING DIRECTOR TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE WITH HIM, NOTING THAT MUCH INFORMATION IS DISPENSED IN REGARD TO SETBACK LINES, ETC. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR NUZIE AND A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING STAFF TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE IN ORLANDO APRIL 23-25, 1980. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WILLIAM GREFE, WHO HAS EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN THE COUNTY'S RIVERFRONT LOTS AT AMBERSAND BEACH, IS HERE TODAY. MR. GREFE, WHO OWNS TWO OCEANFRONT LOTS IN AMBERSAND BEACH SUBDIVISION, IS SUGGESTING A TRADE OF HIS TWO OCEANFRONT LOTS FOR THE COUNTY'S TWO RIVERFRONT LOTS PLUS $65,000 IN CASH. MR. THOMAS SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING APPRAISAL ON MR. GREFE'S OCEANFRONT LOTS: Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Registered Real Estate Broker March 10, 1980 Mr, Tommy Thomas, Coordinator County Road & Bridge Dept, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, Dear Mr, Thomas: Vero Isles Safes Office 93 Royal Palm Blvd. Phone (305) 562.4098 In accordance with your request, I have prepared an appraisal of two oceanfront lots located in the northern section of Indian River County, Florida, and legally described as: Lots 6 and 7, AMBERSAND BEACH SUBDIVISION, Unit 1. AMBERSAND BEACH SUBDIVISION is located some three mile south of the Sebastian Inlet and consists of 84 residential lots having a width of 55 feet as measured along the shoreline and extending west to frontage on the Indian Rivera State Highway A -1-A traverses the lots some 300 to 400 feet west of the ocean and near the Indian River shore line. The southern 10 lots are the only lots with -a buildable depth between A•.1 -A and the river. The subject lots, designated as a public park, are located in the southern section of the subdivision with a depth of some 325 feet between A -1-A and the river. At this time the ocean portion of lots are open for public use with the river portion closed. The ocean front portion of the lots have been cleared and shell mixed with the sand to provide parking in the rear. There are no structures on the lots. Based on a personal inspection of the lots and a reiew of recent lot sales in the subdivision, it is my opinion that the lots warrant a fair market value, as of March 10, 1980 of $140,000 of which $100,000 was apportioned to the oceanfront section and $40,000 to the portion between A -1-A and the river. Respectfully submitted, Floyd Wilkes 31 - - BOOK 43 PAGE -174^ -APR 91990 I r APR S 1990 RECE T LOT SALES IN AMBERSAND SUBDIVISION. (1) Lot 11, Plat 2 592-673 $60,000, 7/23/79 (2 ) Lot 520 Plat 1 598-345 $50,000 1/28/80 (3 ) Lots 50 and 51, Plat 1 596-835 $100,000 12/4/79 (4) Lots 8 and 9. Plat 1 589E-1870 $95,000 8/10/79 (5) Lot 6, Plat 2 581-880 $55,000 3/2/79 (6 ) Lots 13 and 14, Plat 1 572-1380 $825,500 7/24/78 (7) Lot 25, Plat 1 578-1165 $39,500 12/8/78 (8 ) Lot 28, Plat 1 575-1988 $35,000 10/3/78 (9) Lot 20, Plat 2 568-1142 $39,500 5/3/78 (10 ) Lot 3, Unit 2 565-1553 $37,500 4/11/78 600K 43 eAGE 175 It appears lot values are improving with 1979 sales considerable above the 1978 sales. The only sale that indicated any market data for the river portion of the subject lots were (A) Lot 3, Plat 1 408947 $19 , 000 10/5,!72 (B) West of A -1-A portion of Lot 3, Plat 425-927 $7,500 1/5/73 After a careful. stddy of the recent lot sales in Ambersand Reach and keeping in mind that although most of the lots have only a narrow strip bete ai A -1-A Highway and the river, they do have access to the river and could possibly construct a dock out to deeper waters it -was -my conclusion that the oceanfront portion of the subject lots warrant a value of $100y 000.00. With knowledge of sales and offering of riverfront lots on the Indian River between ttiabasso and Sebastian and in the Roseland area, it is my opinion that the riverfront portion of the subject lots which has been partially cleared warrants a value of $40,000.00. Lots in the near vicinity of the subject park are not as desirable for homesites as other locations in the subdivision. If you note Lots 8 and 9. Plat 1, which is shown as Sale (4) adjoins the subject lots and sold 8/10/79 for $95,000® Since these lots have useable depth to the river portion, this sale was considerably under other location sales. It is my opinion that due to the undesirable influence of the unattended park, the ocean section of Lot 8 and 9, warrant a value of $65,000 and the portion between A -1-A Highway and the river while not having the depth of the subject does appear to have maple depth for a homesite on the river and was valued at $35,000.00. - ® M $39,500 12/8/78 LES 0500 .9/12/7f $95,,000 8/10/79 Subje � 44 t Lots r. f C, QZ :mz OR -16 4 3 COASTAL CONSTRUCTION SETBACK LINE ADDED REVISION REVISION R E jF 860K 43 PAGE 176 APR 91980 - - - ..... - '"IDtT�Jl4SR.'�•aeIIi�Qr ..• _- <ev>!� � •1tw.. �wcamrc r. •svvg v®s..•.+r:+^�c—.+�¢�at�pt•t•' , I 4 w � . Yom. �� • , ._ � - K D.: "" ` $500000 1/28/80 '5''' - $100,000 12/4/79 f o} 79 • ,a6L Ss Ii, -A S A 41 58 37ys, R-14 r 2 "6 t 55 a� 7 G s 0 33 q,�•. 7-7 S 3 + \ GOV. --LOT- Z \- • 7 . j v. •.O�I,o / y� 1,70 cv .4 BOOK 43 PAGE t77 M,.I{•. m>.^r�r: �: ...p..-"SC::'.-:'..c:?ti.+.t�'a: ...... .�Ac 197iA[:^� f3� 0 1A SIA. TI A $35,000 010/3/78 i \ 4�V 47 �d SECCND ST. - 52 32 M 'd 3c7 —A 29 -rte 29 _ M 28 ;-� �� �d 28 Y 2, \ - 26 f \ _ '4 24 \ m Sales' 1 l 22 22 { s 20 :20 11. $39,500 5/3/ 78 19^"\19,$38,500 7/11/78 ,'T �v� �� t8y , ; ` ` r ` •18 $78,000 6/6/78 17 LOT 1 V 1 15 14 113 12..,, \.12 Q'+�' I��.s: .\\ :'•II ,, $60,000 8/23/79 io \ 1 i S-)6 ($55,000 3/2/79 5 �)5 00 e 4'" 4 37,500 4/11/78 FIRST ST N - 0 - BOOK 43, PAGE 178 APR 91980 APR 91980 - _ MOK 43 PaGF 179 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT MR. GREFE'S OFFER IS ABOUT $30,000 OFF FROM THE APPRAISAL VALUES.N MR. GREFE CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND STATED THAT HE HAS SOME DIFFERENCES WITH THE APPRAISAL. HE NOTED THAT THE COUNTY PROPERTY HAS A MANGROVE SLOUGH RUNNING THROUGH IT AND VERY LITTLE HIGH GROUND, AND YOU CANNOT BUILD ON MANGROVE OR FILL IT. HE FELT HIS RIVERFRONT PROPERTY IS WORTH MORE THAN THE COUNTY'S JUST BASED ON THE HIGH GROUND; ALSO, THE APPRAISAL DOES NOT MENTION THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE PRICES ARE TWO YEARS OLD. MR. GREFE POINTED OUT THAT MR. WILKES APPRAISED THE COUNTY PROPERTY AT $100,000 AND HIS, WHICH IS ADJACENT, AT $35,000 LESS, AND IT IS IDENTICAL LAND. COORDINATOR THOMAS EXPLAINED THAT IF THE COUNTY SHOULD SELL THEIR LOTS, THEN THERE WOULD BE NO PARK, BUT IF THE PARK IS THERE, IT DOES HAVE AN ADVERSE AFFECT ON THE ADJOINING PROPERTY VALUES. COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT ONE OF MR. GREFE'S RIVERFRONT LOTS HAS A DEPTH OF 210', WHILE THE COUNTY'S LOTS HAVE A DEPTH OF 309' AND 355'. HE ASKED MR. GREFE IF HE HAD RIPARIAN RIGHTS, AND MR. GREFE SAID THAT IT IS SO STATED ON HIS DEED. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT THE QUESTION IS WHETHER MR. GREFE HAS PERFECTED HIS TITLE OUT TO THE BULKHEAD LINE AS THE COUNTY HAS, WHICH IS DIFFERENT THAN HAVING RIPARIAN RIGHTS. BY PERFECTING TITLE YOU ACTUALLY OWN THE LAND UNDER THE RIVER FOR 1,000' OUT INTO THE BAY, WHICH IS NOT DONE ANY MORE. MR. GREF`-STATED THAT HIS UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS LAND CANNOT BE UTILIZED--fOR ANYTHING BUT A DOCK IN ANY EVENT, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT -IT -MAY GIVE YOU SOME CLAIM TO CLAM AND OYSTER BEDS, ETC. MR. GREFE STATED THAT HE DID NOT PARTICULARLY WISH TO SELL HIS OCEANFRONT PROPERTY BUT WOULD PREFER TO OWN THE RIVERFRONT PROPERTY TO EXPAND THERE, HE FELT IT WOULD BE ADVANTAGEOUS FOR THE COUNTY TO OBTAIN MORE OCEANFRONT FOR THEIR PARK. HE STATED THAT HE HAS NO USE FOR THE LAND OUT IN THE BAY AND WOULD BE WILLING TO TAKE JUST THE AVAILABLE LAND AND LET THE COUNTY KEEP THEIR BAY BOTTOM. 36 177 IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, THE BOARD GENERALLY FELT THAT THE APPRAISAL WAS RIGHT, AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT THERE IS A VALUE TO THE PERFECTED TITLE IN THAT THE DER AND THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAVE TALKED ABOUT BUYING THOSE RIGHTS BACK. COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF MR, GREFE WOULD ENTERTAIN THE IDEA OF SELLING JUST HIS OCEANFRONT, AND HE STATED THAT HE WOULD SELL, NOT AT THE PRICE SET OUT IN THE APPRAISAL, BUT AT $110,000 WHICH IS THE LISTED PRICE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WAS NOT INTERESTED AT THAT PRICE. MR. GREFE STATED THE VERY LEAST HE WOU4LD CONSIDER IS $100,000 - $60,000 AND THE RIVERFRONT LOTS OR $100,000 CASH. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF THE COMMISSION IS INTERESTED IN MR. GREFE'S OFFER ON THE BASIS OF MR. WILKES' APPRAISAL, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED HE WOULD BE INTERESTED ON THAT BASIS, BUT NOT IN GOING 40% OR MORE ABOVE THE APPRAISAL, FOR WHICH HE FELT A GOVERNMENTAL BODY COULD BE HARSHLY CRITICIZED. MR. GREFE CONTINUED TO DEBATE THE VALIDITY OF THE APPRAISAL, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PARK, WHICH HAS A VANDALISM PROBLEM AFFECTS THE VALUE OF THE SURROUNDING LOTS, AND IN ADDITION, MR. WILKES TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION THE FACT THAT MR. GREFE PURCHASED THESE LOTS EIGHT MONTHS AGO AT $95,000. COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT HE WOULD BE MORE INTERESTED IN PURCHASING THE OCEANFRONT AND NOT GIVING UP THE RIVERFRONT, AND THE BOARD CONCURRED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUMMED IT UP, STATING THAT THE BOARD WOULD BE INTERESTED IN PURCHASING MR. GREFE'S OCEANFRONT AT THE APPRAISED VALUE WITH NO SWAP OF THE RIVERFRONT PROPERTY. MR. GREFE STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT CONSIDER LESS THAN $100,000 AND IF THE BOARD DID NOT MAKE A DECISION, THE PROPERTY WOULD BE SOLD WITHIN A WEEK. THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED MR. GREFE TO GO AHEAD AND SELL IT. I 37 APR 91980 - BOOK 43 PAGEBO r APR 9 19 0 BOOK 43 FOGS 181 JAY ,JOHNSON, OF THE TODAY NEWSPAPER, APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD SPEAKING FOR HIMSELF AND EIGHT OTHER MEMBERS OF THE MEDIA, WHO ARE REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD TAPE RECORD ITS MEETINGS IN ORDER. TO SERVE THE PUBLIC BETTER. HE NOTED THAT THE COMMISSION MEETINGS ARE LONG, ITEMS ARE TAKEN UP AT VARIED TIMES, AND EMERGENCY ITEMS ARE TAKEN UP THAT NEVER APPEAR ON THE AGENDA. HE CONTINUED THAT NOT ONLY WOULD SUCH A TAPE MAKE FOR MORE ACCURATE AND FULL REPORTING, BUT IT WOULD ALSO BENEFIT THE COMMISSION TO BE ABLE TO REFER TO THE TAPES WHEN THERE WAS ANY DISAGREEMENT ABOUT WHAT ACTUALLY WAS SAID AT A PREVIOUS MEETING SINCE THE MINUTES ARE NOT VERBATIM. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF MR. .JOHNSON WAS SUGGESTING THAT THE MEETINGS NOT ONLY BE TAPED, BUT THE TAPES STORED FOREVER, AND MR. .JOHNSON FELT THAT WOULD BE UP TO THE BOARD. HE COMMENTED THAT THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES HAS TAPES GOING BACK TO 1969. MR. .JOHNSON STATED THAT A THREE HOUR TAPE COSTS AROUND $5.00 AND ESTIMATED IT WOULD COST ABOUT $250.00 A YEAR, PLUS THE NEED FOR A SMALL CABINET TO STORE THE TAPES. HE CONTINUED THAT ONE ARGUMENT AGAINST TAPING IS THAT IT WOULD CAUSE MORE WORK FOR THE RECORDING SECRETARY AND IT ALSO HAS BEEN ASKED WHY THE PRESS CAN T BE THERE IN PERSON. HE NOTED THAT ONLY THE PRESS .JOURNAL HAS THE LUXURY OF A REPORTER WHO CAN ATTEND THE MEETING ALL DAY LONG; THE OTHERS ALL HAVE OTHER MEETINGS AND EVENTS THEY MUST COVER. MR. .JOHNSON THEN DISCUSSED MAKING DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE BOARD AND COUNTY---OrFFICIALS MORE EASILY AVAILABLE TO THE PRESS AND THE PUBLIC BY.HAVI-NG'A PUBLIC RECORDS FILE. HE NOTED THAT BACK WHEN THE HOUSING AUTHORS TY -WAS BEING DISCUSSED, A MEMBER OF ST. HELEN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH SAID HIS CHURCH HAD SENT A LETTER SUPPORTING THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. THE PRESS HAD NEVER HEARD OF THIS LETTER, AND THEY FELT THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN INTERESTED TO KNOW THAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH WAS BEHIND THIS PROJECT, BUT THEY COULD NOT WRITE ABOUT IT. HE CITED OTHER SIMILAR HAPPENINGS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED WHAT HE MEANT BY A "PUBLIC RECORDS FILE, it AND MR. .JOHNSON EXPLAINED THAT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH JUST W XEROXES LETTERS SENT IN AND PUTS THEM ON A CLIPBOARD TO MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO THE PRESS. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY THAT THE WHOLE PROCEEDING OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION MEETINGS BE TAPE RECORDED ON THE BASIS THAT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT THE PUBLIC HAVE AS MUCH KNOWLEDGE AS POSSIBLE OF WHAT OCCURS AT THESE MEETINGS; THE REPORTERS ARE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETINGS FULL TIME, AND MANY IMPORTANT THINGS, THEREFORE, ARE NEVER COVERED. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO GET SOME KIND OF ASSURANCE FROM THE PRESS THAT THEY WILL NOT DISRUPT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICES THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE .FAR LETTING THEM USE THE TAPES, AND SHE FURTHER WISHED TO BE ASSURED THAT THE TAPES ACTUALLY WILL BE USED. IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE TAPES WILL NOT BE COMPLETELY INDEXED, BUT IT WAS NOT FELT THAT THIS WOULD CAUSE A PROBLEM. ANN ROBINSON, INTERESTED CITIZEN, SPOKE IN FAVOR OF TAPING THE MEETINGS. SHE FELT IT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL AND DID NOT BELIEVE IT HAD CAUSED THE CITY ANY PROBLEM. COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THESE TAPES AND THEY SHOULD NOT BE TAMPERED WITH] ALSO THE TAPE HAS TO BE LISTENED TO IN THE COMMISSION ROOM. HE EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT CONTROL OF THE TAPES AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THEIR USE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DID NOT BELIEVE THERE IS ANY REQUIREMENT THAT WE HAVE TO PUT THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON TAPE, BUT FELT THE BOARD JUST ESTABLISHED THIS PROCEDURE. HE DID NOT FEEL THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WOULD HAVE TO BE PUT ON SEPARATE TAPES. ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED, BUT FELT THE BOARD WOULD HAVE TO KEEP CONTROL OF THE TAPES. COMMISSIONER LYONS DID NOT ANTICIPATE ANY PROBLEM WITH THE TAPES. HE FELT IT IS WORTH SOME MONEY TO DO THIS BECAUSE IT IS IMPORTANT TO BRING ABOUT UNDERSTANDING OF THE FUNCTIONS OF THE COMMISSION AND WHAT IT DO.FS. 39 APR 91980 BOOK - PARE _J�Z APR 9 19 86 - _ foax 43 PACE l83 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED ON THE PROBLEM INVOLVED WITH THINGS BEING TAKEN OUT OF THE MINUTES (OR TAPES) AND USED MORE OR LESS OUT OF CONTEXT WHICH GIVES A DIFFERENT SLANT TO THE MEANING. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD VOTE FOR THE MOTION AS LONG AS THE PRESS UNDERSTANDS THAT THE SECRETARIES CANNOT SPEND HOURS AT A TIME PULLING TAPES, PUTTING THEM ON THE MACHINE, ETC. HE ALSO NOTED THAT HE DID NOT WISH TO SEE THE PRESS USE THESE TAPES AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR ATTENDING THE MEETINGS. MEMBERS OF THE MEDIA, PETE NOEL AND PHIL LONG, EMPHASIZED THAT THE PRESS WOULD BE GLAD TO COOPERATE TO WORK OUT THE LEAST DISRUPTIVE METHOD OF USING THE TAPES, AND IT WAS FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT IF THEY HAD TO DEPEND ON LISTENING TO THE TAPES INSTEAD OF ATTENDING THE MEETINGS, THEY WOULD BE A DAY LATE WITH THE NEWS. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS NOTED THAT AS THE SITUATION STANDS NOW, HE AND MR. KENNINGS SPEND A GREAT DEAL OF TIME THE DAY AFTER MEETINGS BRIEFING REPORTERS, AND HE WOULD ASSUME THIS NO LONGER WOULD BE NECESSARY. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FEELS IT IS THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE THIS INFORMATION AVAILABLE, AND HE WOULD SUPPORT THE MOTION. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. A BLACK GENTLEMAN IN THE AUDIENCE COMMENDED THE BOARD FOR SUPPORTING USE QF THE TAPES. ON MOTTO -N -BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD. -UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE BOARDS SECRETARY TO MEET WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PRESS COMMITTEE AND COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION AS TO A WORKABLE SYSTEM FOR MAKING DOCUMENTS RECEIVED BY THE COMMISSIONERS MORE EASILY AVAILABLE TO THE PRESS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THESE DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE MADE PUBLIC BEFORE THE BOARD MEMBER OR OFFICIAL THEY ARE ADDRESSED TO HAS SEEN THEM, AND HE ALSO NOTED THAT THIS FILE COULD NOT BE MAINTAINED INDEFINITELY - POSSIBLY ONLY TWO OR THREE DAYS. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THIS ALL CAN BE WORKED OUT. 177 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECESSED AT 11:45 O'CLOCK A.M. FOR LUNCH AND A MEETING WITH THE VERO BEACH DODGER BASEBALL TEAM AND RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT. DR. FLOOD, DIRECTOR OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, DISCUSSED THE FOOD SERVICE INSPECTION CONTRACT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS BEEN WORKING FOR YEARS TO AVOID DUPLICATION OF INSPECTION IN THE RESTAURANTS, HE NOTED THAT THE RESTAURANT COM- MISSION AND THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT USE DIFFERENT STANDARDS, AND HE FELT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTORS ARE BETTER TRAINED. THEY NOW HAVE ARRIVED AT A SITUATION WHERE ALL RESTAURANTS EXCEPT THOSE CONNECTED WITH A HOTEL WILL BE INSPECTED BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. DR. FLOOD FELT THE FEE IS AN ARBITRARY ONE, BUT NOTED THAT EVEN THOUGH IT IS SMALL, IT IS MONEY THEY DID NOT HAVE BEFORE. HE NOTED THAT THERE IS AN ADVANTAGE IN THE PAPERWORK ALSO BECAUSE THE DHRS HAS COMPUTERS AND THEY NOW WILL GET COMPUTER PRINT-OUTS. DR. FLOOD FELT THE CONTRACT IS A GOOD THING AND RECOMMENDED THAT IT BE SIGNED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS AND THE DHRS AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS. 41 APR 9 NOBOOK 43 PACE�.�4 L_ APR 91980 BOOK 43 p4a185 CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DIVISION OF HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, hereinafter referred to as the Department, and the Division of Hotels and Restaurants, Department of Business Regulation, hereinafter referred to as the Division, pursuant to §509.032(2), Florida Statutes, and in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements expressed herein do hereby contract and agree as follows: 1. The Division appoints the Department, through the facilities of the County Health Units, as the Division's agent for the purpose of inspecting designated public food service establishments in Florida with all powers, duties and responsibilities expressly authorized in Chapter 509, Florida Statutes, as amended by Chapter 79-240, Laws of Florida. 2. The Division shall submit to the Department on or before January 1st each year a county by county list of all food service establishments subject to this contract. The list so furnished is to become a part of this contract. Additions. and deletions to the list shall be by mutual agreement of the Division and the Department. 3. The Department will: a. Promulgate rules for sanitary standards which shall be enforced in all public food service establishments. b. Conduct four inspections annually of designated public food service establishments licensed by the Division to determine if established health and safety standards are maintained. c. Cooperate with the Division in assuring that designated licensed accounts comply with established health and safety standards. d. Submit to the Division on a timely basis a written record of the results on each inspection, reinspection and change in status on forms mutually agreed upon and adopted by the Division and the Department. 0 f � J s N 4. The Division will: a. Adopt, promulgate and enforce those sanitary standards promulgate as rules by the Department. b. Adopt, promulgate and enforce Chapter 4A, Rules of the Insurance Commissioner and Treasurer as State Fire Marshal, as they apply to public food service establishments. c. Provide to the Department data processing services including reports of inspection activity by each County Health Unit. d. Assist the Department in the enforcement of sanitary and safety standards through the administrative processes authorized by 5509.261, Florida Statutes. e. Pay to the Department the sum of $17 per designated food service establishment licensed as of each June 30. Said payment shall be made annually within sixty (60) days after June 30. f. Annually review license fees, operating costs and rate of payment to the Department for possible modification. 5. This contract shall take effect upon execution and shall be automatically renewed, subject to amendment, on January 1 of each.year unless either party provides 90 day advance written notice of their intention to terminate. David H. Pingree, Secreta Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services County Health Officer Indian River County Chairman, Board of County Commission Indian River County R. B. Burroughs, 4r., Secretary Department of Business Regulation APR 9 WO BOOK 413 PAG�iV6 APR 91980 anx -43 PAGE) -87 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT ITEM 12 IN REGARD TO A POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT ON THE MENTAL HEALTH BOARD N0. 9 WILL BE WITHDRAWN FROM TODAY IS AGENDA. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS REPORTED THAT MAYOR FLOOD OF SEBASTIAN HAS REQUESTED AN ADDITIONAL $3,.000 FROM THE BOATING AND IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE BUILDING OF THEIR DOCK. HE NOTED THAT THE COSTS FOR BUILDING THE DOCK HAVE ESCALATED TO AROUND $26,000, AND IF WE GIVE THEM THE ADDITIONAL $3,000, THEY STILL WILL HAVE TO PUT IN $18,000. HE REPORTED THAT THEY DO HAVE THE CONCRETE PILINGS IN, BUT ENCOUNTERED SOME UNEXPECTED PROBLEMS WITH PERMITTING WHICH DELAYED THEM, .AND DUE TO INFLATION AND SOME CHANGES IN THE PROJECT, THE COSTS WENT UP. COORDINATOR THOMAS BELIEVED THAT SEBASTIAN HAS MORE BOATS THAN MOST PLACES IN THE COUNTY AND PAYS MORE INTO THE BOATING FUNDS, AND HE, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED THAT THEIR REQUEST BE APPROVED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT A VAST NUMBER OF THE PEOPLE WHO USE THAT RAMP ARE NOT NECESSARILY RESIDENTS OF SEBASTIAN OR EVEN - OF THIS COUNTY, BUT HE FELT IT IS GREATLY USED BY BOTH RESIDENTS AND TOURISTS. HE BELIEVED THEY WISHED TO HAVE THIS COMPLETED FOR THE 4TH OF .JULY FESTIVITIES. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL $3,000 REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN FROM THE BOATING AND IMPROVEMENT FUND. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING MEMO IN REGARD TO A BACKHOE AND TRENCHING MACHINE FOR THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT: 44 _I Aril 7; 1980 ML I,IUFANDUM b TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: County Administrator SUBJECT: Backhoe & Trenching Machine The Utility Department frequently has a need for a backhoe and trenching machine. Currently, the department is required to rent this type of equipment at a rate of $100.00 per day? This type of equipment is used for line restoration, system expansion and many other projects. F.H.A. has been requested to approve the use of contingency funds for the purchase of this equipment - Enclosure 1. It is anticipated that our request will be approved shortly. Based on the above, the Purchasing Deparbitent has advertised for bids on this type of equipment and bids are due April 16th. It is recommended that: 1. The bid process be allowed to continue. 2. Upon approval of F.H.A.to use contingency money in the purchase of this equipment, the Board will accept the best bid at a future date. Jack/G. Jennings, 5.0unty Admina.stiator OO , s NAN/ep ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETROACTIVE APPROVAL IN REGARD TO ADVERTISING FOR BIDS ON A BACKHOE AND TRENCHING MACHINE FOR THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT AND CONTINUING THE BIDDING PROCESS AS SET OUT IN THE ABOVE MEMO. COMMISSIONER LYONS REPORTED THAT HE WOULD RECOMMEND THE APPOINTMENT OF MARILYN CHENAULT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL, AND SHE IS WILLING TO SERVE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 80-34 APPOINTING MARILYN CHENAULT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE E.O.C. 45 APR 91980 B(IUK 43 PdGF 188 4. APR 9 1980 coax 43 PAGE 189 RESOLUTION NO. 80-34 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That MARILYN M. CHENAULT is hereby appointed to serve on the Board of Directors of the Economic Opportunities Council of Indian River County, Inc. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 9th day of April , 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, NCV BY v ',,'it Willard W. Siebert, Jfl, Chairman Attest: Freda Wright, Clerk CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THE NEXT ITEM TO BE CON- SIDERED WOULD BE COMMISSIONER LYONS' RECOMMENDATION IN REGARD TO A LIBRARY STUDY COMMITTEE. THE CHAIRMAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT JOHN BEIDLER, PRESIDENT OF THE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, HAD INFORMED HIM THAT SUCH A COMMITTEE HAS HIS TOTAL SUPPORT, AND HE FEELS IT WOULD BE A WORTHWHILE SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY. COMMISSIONER LYONS REPORTED THAT HE HAS RESUMES FROM FIVE PEOPLE WHO WISH TO SERVE ON THE LIBRARY STUDY COMMITTEE AND A SIXTH VOLUNTEER, HE FELT THIS WILL BE A QUICK SURVEY BY AN AD HOC COMMITTEE AND HOPED TO HAVE A FIRST REPORT FROM THEM IN MAY AND A FINAL REPORT BY .JUNE, HOPEFULLY IN TIME"FOR BUDGET SESSION, HE CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD RECOMMEND ALL FIVE WHO HAVE SUBMITTED RESUMES AND, IN ADDITION, WOULD ALSO RECOMMEND MARY ANN LUETHJE, WHO HAS SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN. HE SUGGESTED THAT TOM NASON BE MADE CHAIRMAN OF SUCH A COMMITTEE. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION N0, 80-35 APPOINTING THE FOLLOWING TO THE LIBRARY STUDY COMMITTEE, NAMING TOM NASON AS CHAIRMAN: Tom NASON CHARLES A. BROWN EVELYN SHEA PATRICK MURPHY DOROTHY SAUNDERS MARY ANN LUETHJE COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF COMMISSIONER LYONS WAS GOING TO RECOMMEND THIS COMMITTEE. HAVE A STAFF FOR A LONG RANGE STUDY, AND HE STATED THAT HE WAS NOT AND ONE OF THE REASONS FOR RECOMMENDING TOM NASON AS CHAIRMAN IS THAT HE HAS ACCESS TO SOME OFFICE HELP AND CAN GET INFORMATION FROM OTHER CITIES. HE FELT THIS COULD BE A VERO BEACH CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY. HE DID NOT KNOW IF THE COMMITTEE WOULD NEED TRAVEL FUNDS OR NOT AND NOTED THEY MIGHT HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE BOARD IN REGARD TO THIS, COMMISSIONER LYONS CONTINUED THAT HE WISHED TO KNOW IF THE LIBRARY IS MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE POPULATION AND IF IT IS MEETING 47 190 APR 91980 BOOK 43 -PAGE L APR 9 1980 Boa 43' pAu191 THEM ON A GEOGRAPHICAL BASIS, ETC. HE MENTIONED THE POSSIBILITY THAT A STORE FRONT BRANCH IN THE NORTH COUNTY MIGHT SERVE MORE PEOPLE THAN THE BOOKMOBILE. HE NOTED THE COMMISSIONERS MIGHT HAVE OTHER NAMES THEY WISHED TO ADD TO THIS COMMITTEE. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT THE PEOPLE RECOMMENDED ALL VOLUNTEERED, AND HE BELIEVED THEY HAVE FINE QUALIFICATIONS. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. RESOLUTION NO. 80-35 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the following persons are hereby appointed to serve on the INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIBRARY STUDY COMMITTEE: THOMAS R. NASON CHARLES A. BROWN EVELYN SHEA PATRICK H. MURPHY DOROTHY C. SAUNDERS MARY ANN LUETHJE Chairman Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 9th day of April , 1980., Attest: Freda Wright, C�j6rk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,,FLORIDA BY Willard W. Siebert, it/, Chairman r ATTORNEY DOROTHY HUDSON CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING THE MOORINGS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, WHICH IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A REPLAT OF UNIT 6, ALSO KNOWN AS MOORINGS UNIT 2, LOT 58 AND PARCEL A. MISS HUDSON STATED THAT THIS HAS BEEN BEFORE THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, AND THEY DID APPROVE IT. SHE NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAD PREVIOUSLY ABENDONED A PORTION OF BOWLINE DRIVE BY RESOLUTION No, 79-77, AND WITH THE ABANDONMENT AND THE WIDENING OF SPRINGLINE DRIVE, THEY INTEND TO DEVELOP THIS AS A UNIFIED PARCEL. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER CONFIRMED THAT THIS HAS BEEN CHECKED BY BOTH THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AND THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW COMMITTEE AND HAS BEEN APPROVED. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT IT IS READY TO GO AS FAR AS HIS DEPARTMENT IS CONCERNED, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH THE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE REPLAT, WHICH MAKES PARCEL A AND LOT 58 ONE PARCEL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REPLAT OF UNIT 6, THE MOORINGS, WHICH FORMERLY WAS UNIT 2, LOT 58 AND PARCEL A, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE PROPER OFFICIALS. THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: 49 APR 9190 Bm 49 PAGE x.92 APR 91980 BOOK 43 PAGE 193 VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Az�& in the matter of in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. PP Sworn to and subscribed before rgp this day of A. D. / (SEAL) ••-vii-rv� L - A (Business Manager) (Clerk of the Circuit Cpujt, Indian River County, Florida) NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has tentatively ap- proved the following changes and additions to the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, which changes and additions are substantially as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property situated west of S.R. A -1-A between Regatta Drive and Mooringline Drive in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit:; Parcel "A," Lot 58 and that portion of abandoned Bowline Drive running between Regatta Drive to the north and Mooringline Drive to the south as platted in The Moorings, Unit 2, recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 28, in the Public Records. of Indian - River County, Florida Be changed from C -IA Restricted Com- mercial District to- R -2C Multiple Family District. A public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by said Planning and Zoning Commission in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Thursday, February 14„ 1980, at 7:30 P.M., after which said public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard will be iheld by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,. Florida, in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wed. nesday, April 9,1980, at 2:00 P.M. Board of County Commissioners Indian River County., By: W.W. Siebert Chairman Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission By: Dick Bird, Chairman Chairman Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission By: Dick Bird, Chairman Jan. 16, 18,1980. NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO JORGE GONZALEZ, PRESIDENT OF THE MOORINGS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 125-66, AND COPY OF SAME IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK. VICKI RENNA, MEMBER OF THE PLANNING STAFF, REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 12 ACRES LOCATED IN THE MOORINGS, UNIT 2 (JUST REPLATTED) AND IT IS SITUATED WEST OF S.R. AIA BETWEEN REGATTA DRIVE AND MOORINGLINE DRIVE AND INCLUDES THE PORTION OF BOWLINE DRIVE RECENTLY ABANDONED. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE REZONING FROM C -1A TO R -2C IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT MULTIPLE FAMILY 50 UNITS. MISS RENNA STATED THAT THE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS THEY FEEL IT WOULD BE A BETTER ZONING SITUATION AND WOULD BLEND IN BETTER WITH THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL AREA, SHE NOTED THAT MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS CAN BE DESIGNED TO REDUCE TRAFFIC NOISE AND CONGESTION THAT WOULD BE IN A C -IA ZONE. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION VOTED UNANIMOUSLY FOR THE PROPOSED REZONING. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE N0, 80-11 REZONING THE PORTION OF THE MOORINGS DESCRIBED IN THE ADVERTISEMENT FROM C -IA TO R -2C, 51 APR 9190 BOOK 43 �PAGE 194 � �� APR 91980 Boos 43 PAGE 1.95 ORDINANCE NO. 80-11 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto, held a public hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: Parcel "A", Lot 58 and that portion of abandoned Bowline Drive running between Regatta Drive to the north and Mooringline Drive to the south as platted in The Moorings, Unit 2, recorded in Plat Book 8, Page 28, in the Public Records of Indian River County Florida Be changed from C -1A Restricted Commercial District to R -2C Multiple Family District. All within the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Zoning Regulation. This Ordinance shall take effect April 14, 1980. 7— THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLEPK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT: VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr, who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in` Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being /di a / ^1.�'.Qi in the matter of in the lished in said newspaper in the issues of Court, was pub - IV I Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Q ��,, Sworn to and subscribed b ore this v � day of CL— A.D. /??O (Business Manager) (Clerk of the Circuit rt, Indian River County, Florida) (SEAL) NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has tentatively ap- proved the following changes and additions to the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, which changes and additions are substantially as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property situated on the north side of Sth Street S.W. (Rebel Road) approximately 300 feet west of 27th Avenue in Indian River County, Florida, to - wit: All of Westwood Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 9, page 66, of the Public Records of Indian River County, said land lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. Be changed from R-1 Single Family District to R-213 Multiple Family District. A public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard, will be held by said Planning and Zoning Commission in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Thursday, February 14, 1980, at 7:30 P.M., after which said public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard will be held by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wed- nesday, April 9,1980, at 2:00 P.M. Board of County Commissioners Indian River County By: W.W. Siebert Chairman Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission By: Dick Bird, Chairman Jan. 16,18,1980. NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO FEORGE P. CHILDERS, JOSEPHINE STECZ, EUGENE WILMOTH, DAVID C. MARTELL, KLAUS Z.ANDER, MARGARET FRIEL, AND GERALD BECHTOLD, BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66. COPIES OF SAME ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK. PLANNING DIRECTOR DAVID REVER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS TEN ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 5TH ST. S.W. (REBEL RD.) AND WEST OF 27TH AVENUE. IT LIES BEHIND A C-1 STRIP WHICH CONTAINS SKATETOWN. THE PROPERTY IS PRESENTLY SUBDIVIDED INTO HALF ACRE LOTS WITH ONE RESIDENCE ON LOT 3. THERE IS SOME APR 91980 53 BOAR 43 PAGE 196 APR 91980 aoox 43 PAGE 197 ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TAKING PLACE EAST ON 27TH IN THE SAME VICINITY WHICH WENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION AFTER THE ORIGINAL HEARING TOOK PLACE, MR. REVER STATED THAT THE APPLICATION IS IN ORDER, AND THE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL FOR REZONING TO R -2B. THE ORIGINAL REQUEST WAS FOR R-2, BUT THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THEY LESSEN THE DENSITY TO R -2B. THE APPLICANT AGREED, AND THE REZONING REQUEST WAS CONSIDERED AS R -2B. MR. REVER CONTINUED THAT THE PLANNING STAFF FEELS THAT THERE IS A SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL TAKING PLACE IN THIS AREA AND THAT R -2B WOULD BE A MORE PROPER TRANSITION BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL OF THE R-1 VARIETY AND THE COMMERCIAL. HE NOTED THAT RIGHT NOW THE SINGLE HOME OWNER ON LOT 3, WHICH IMMEDIATELY ABUTS THE C-1, IS NOT FINDING IT ADVANTAGEOUS FOR HOME OWNERSHIP. MR. REVER FELT THAT RENTAL MIGHT BE A MORE TOLERABLE SITUATION BECAUSE OF THE TURN -OVER IN RENTALS. HE NOTED THAT THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION HAD A SPLIT 2-2 VOTE ON THE PROPOSED REZONING. THE PLANNING STAFF MAINTAINS THAT DUE TO INCREASED DEVELOPMENT OF THE C-1, THIS TYPE OF R-2 DEVELOPMENT IS NOT INCOMPATIBLE OVER THE LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA. ATTORNEY SAM BLOCK APPEARED REPRESENTING THE PETITIONER, DOROTHY AND GEORGE CHILDERS.AND ALSO ALL OF THE SIX OTHER OWNERS OF LOTS IN WESTWOOD SUBDIVISION, WHO HAVE WRITTEN LETTERS APPOINTING GEORGE CHILDERS TO ACT AS AGENT IN THEIR BEHALF. HE STATED THAT THE ORIGINAL REQUEST PLACED BEFORE THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AS R-2 WAS DONE IN ERROR, AND THE REQUEST ALWAYS WAS MEANT TO BE FOR R -2B. ATTORNEY BLOCK STATED THAT MR, AND MRS. CHILDERS HAVE PUT A LOT OF WORK INTO THEIR PROPOSED PROJECT AND WISH TO KEEP IT IN LINE WITH THE COUNTRY ATMOSPHERE AS WILL BE DEMONSTRATED IN THEIR PRESENTATION. DOROTHY CHILDERS AND GEORGE CHILDERS CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION AND SHOW SLIDES OF THE AREA, MRS. CHILDERS STATED THAT SHE AND HER HUSBAND ARE THE PRIMARY LANDHOLDERS IN THE SUBDIVISION AND REPRESENT THEMSELVES AS WELL AS THE OTHER OWNERS, FROM 54 WHOM THEY HAVE LETTERS OF AGENCY. SHE CONTINUED THAT THEY ARE IN FULL ACCORD WITH THE R -2B WHICH WILL LIMIT THEM TO ONLY 8 UNITS AN ACRE INSTEAD OF THE 15 ALLOWED IN R-2 AND WOULD ENABLE THEM TO CONSTRUCT HIGH QUALITY UNITS. MRS. CHILDERS CONTINUED THAT THEIR ORIGINAL INTENT WAS TO RESELL, AND 14 HALF ACRE LOTS WERE CREATED; LANDSCAPING WAS DONE; A FENCE WAS ERECTED TO SEPARATE THE SITE FROM THE MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE EAST, ETC.; AND THEY REALIZED THE SALE OF SIX LOTS, ON ONE OF WHICH A LARGE HOME HAS BEEN BUILT. SINCE THE BUILDING OF SKATETOWN IN 1978 AND THE ENSUING NOISE AND CONFUSION, ONLY ONE ADDITIONAL PARCEL HAS BEEN SOLD; IN ADDITION, THE DECLINE IN THE ECONOMY AND THE HIGHER INTEREST RATES HELPED CREATE A DOWN- TURN IN ACREAGE SALES. FOR THESE REASONS, THEY DECIDED TO PUT IN ATTRACTIVE, LOW DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY UNITS - ONE SINGLE STORY FOURPLEX PER HALF ACRE, EACH UNIT TO CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1000 SQ. FT. OF LIVING AREA, OR A TOTAL OF 4,000 SQ. FT. PER BUILDING. MR. CHILDERS THEN PRESENTED DRAWINGS OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND SLIDES OF THE SURROUNDING AREA, INCLUDING SKATETOWN, COACHLAND MOBILE HOME PARK, AN ADJACENT VACANT TEN ACRE STRIP AND A GOOD MANY OF THE VARIED COMMERCIAL USES BEING CONDUCTED IN THE AREA, INCLUDING CAMPERLAND SALES, A TRANSPORTATION FIRM, A MANU- FACTURING FIRM, AND SOME MINIWAREHOUSES WHICH ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. MR. CHILDERS SHOWED PICTURES OF TALL TREES ALONG REBEL ROAD WHICH PROVIDE A BUFFER. HE ALSO SHOWED SLIDES OF OTHER LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY WHERE THERE ARE APARTMENTS NEARBY WELL -KEPT HOMES, I.E. ROYAL PALM BLVD., AND MCANSH PARK, HE DID NOT FEEL THESE HOMES SUFFERED DEVALUATION AS A RESULT. MRS. CHILDERS DID NOT FEEL THEIR PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD STRIKE A DISCORDANT NOTE WITH THE ATMOSPHERE OF THE AREA BUT THAT RATHER IT WOULD PROVIDE A GOOD TRANSITION FROM RESIDENTIAL TO THE OBJECTIONABLE COMMERCIAL. SHE POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS A RECOGNIZED NEED FOR SUITABLE RENTALS IN THE COUNTY. SHE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE COUNTY HAS SLATED THIS AREA FOR FUTURE WATER AND SEWAGE, AND UNTIL THEN, THEY WOULD ABIDE BY HEALTH DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS AND 55 APR 91980 -MOK 43 wil9 BOOK 43 PAGE i99 SERVICE THE PROJECT WITH WELLS AND SEPTIC TANKS. MRS. CHILDERS COMMENTED THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD IS CONSIDERING ANOTHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE IN THIS AREA, AND SHE DID NOT FEEL THEIR PROJECT WOULD INCREASE THE TRAFFIC ALREADY GENERATED BY THE COMMERCIAL USES IN THE AREA. SHE EMPHASIZED THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR QUALITY APARTMENTS FOR MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES, AND TRANSITIONAL ZONING IS LOGICAL. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT HE HAD RECEIVED A LETTER OF OPPOSITION FROM SCOTT CHISHOLM REPRESENTING REBEL ROAD PROPERTY OWNERS AND PRESENTING A PETITION SIGNED BY SIXTY-FIVE PERSONS ALL OPPOSING THE PROPOSED REZONING. SAID PETITION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK, AND MR. CHISHOLM'S LETTER IS MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS FOLLOWS: April 2,.. 1990 Wien River Board of County Comissimwet Indian River County Court House 'hero Mach, Florida Commissioners:' i p Enclosed you will: find a petition opposing the tenoning of the ten acres of Land, owned by Mr, George Childers, located* on Rebel Road just west- of Skatetown` Av you will: note there are sixt7-five (65) names on the petition representing over two hundred and ten (210) acres of property around' the -area proposed' for rezoning, We the property owners are concerned about the following changes that would take place if'the multiple zoning is approved® 1. Yr.- Childers project_ plaza to place fifty-six (56) families on only ten (10) acres of land in a neighborhood where there are all single family homes on no less than a half acre with the majority on an acre or more. The property owners in this area invested large sums Of money to live in a country -like atmosphere and their investments and envirnoment are now threatened by this project, 2.. In this partially agricultural neighborhood a drought causeB our water table to be severely lowered.. Since our water supply depends solely on Drell Water we fear this many people concentrated in a small area could cause -the demand'to be greater than the supply. 3. Also in Connection with the water we are concerned about the effect that waste from fifty-six (56) families being dropped into the very ground'that'our drinking mater is extracted will have on the parity of that water.. 4. The neighbourhood has accepted the skating rink, even though it Causes parking problems and turner our street into a race track after the rink closem. An apartment comPbm will not only add to the problem that already exists during the evening hours but will also create a traffic problem on the street during the day. 5.- 1r.. Childera-has not maintained the property in question either by mowing or landscaping, so we cannot help but wonder what an apartment complex owned'by him will look like in years to come. 6. The property owners, feel they purchased their land fully aware of the zoning surrounding them,, dust as *..Childers did, and no one expected -a zoning change or feel that one is appropriate. We the property owners only ask that you investigate the area and make a judgment that will be fair to the majority. Sincerely, f Rebel Road Property ojmerg THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. JOHN GOODKNIGHT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE OWNS LOTS I AND 2 OF WESTWOOD SUBDIVISION WHICH ARE IMMEDIATELY BACK OF SKATETOWN. HE SPOKE IN BEHALF OF THE REZONING REQUEST, AND CONTINUED THAT IF THE REZONING IS APPROVED, THEY PLAN TO DEVELOP THOSE TWO LOTS INTO FOURPLEXES IN A STYLE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN DOCUMENTED BY GEORGE CHILDERS. HE FELT THAT NO MATTER HOW YOU LOOK AT IT, THIS PROPERTY IS A BUFFER BETWEEN A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND -THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST, AND HE BELIEVED THEY COULD SERVE THE BUFFER FUNCTION WELL AND ADEQUATELY AS A MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND THAT WHAT THEY PROPOSE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD AND AN ASSET TO IT. SCOTT CHISHOLM NEXT TOOK THE FLOOR REPRESENTING THE REBEL ROAD PROPERTY OWNERS AND NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAS BEEN PRESENTED WITH A PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUESTED REZONING SIGNED BY 65 PEOPLE IN THE AREA REPRESENTING 210 ACRES OF LAND. HE POINTED OUT THAT NO ONE PRESENT IS HERE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT GOING ON ON THE OPPOSITE CORNER. INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE BOUGHT PROPERTY IN THIS AREA KNEW THAT THE COMMERCIAL WAS THERE. 57 APR 9 1980 8oox 43 PAc O APR 91980 Box 43 PAR.201 MR. CHISHOLM EMPHASIZED THAT WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT IS THE COUNTRY ATMOSPHERE, AND IF, INSTEAD OF TWO FAMILIES PER ACRE, YOU HAVE 56 FAMILIES ON TEN ACRES, HE DID NOT BELIEVE THIS IS A COUNTRY ATMOSPHERE. MR. CHISHOLM WENT ON TO EXPRESS CONCERN ABOUT THE EFFECT 56 FAMILIES WOULD HAVE ON THE AREAS WATER SITUATION. HE FURTHER STATED THAT HE DID NOT FEEL THAT MR. CHILDERS HAD MADE MUCH OF AN EFFORT TO LANDSCAPE HIS PROPERTY AND NOTED THAT NO BUFFER HAS BEEN BUILT TO ISOLATE THIS PROPERTY FROM THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. MR. CHISHOLM COMMENTED WITH REFERENCE TO SKATETOWN, NOISE SEEMS TO BE THE BIG FACTOR, BUT HE DID NOT FEEL THERE IS A NOISE PROBLEM EXCEPT WHEN THEY OPEN THE DOORS, AND THE DOORS ARE NOT LEFT OPEN WHEN THEY ARE IN OPERATION. HE STATED THAT THE PICTURES SHOWN BY MR. CHILDERS SHOWING HOMES IN CLOSE RELATION TO APARTMENTS ARE NOT COMPARABLE BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL IN A DOWNTOWN AREA, NOT A COUNTRY AREA. HE FURTHER EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THIS TYPE OF ZONING WOULD SPREAD AND POINTED OUT THAT THEY HAD BEEN LED TO BELIEVE THAT THIS WOULD BE ONE PROJECT CARRIED OUT BY MR. CHILDERS, BUT THEY WERE JUST ASTOUNDED TO LEARN THAT ANOTHER PROPERTY OWNER IN THE WESTWOOD SUBDIVISION INTENDS TO DO A SIMILAR DEVELOPMENT ON HI.S LOTS. APPAR- ENTLY EVERYONE IN THE SUBDIVISION WOULD BE ALLOWED TO DO WHAT HE WANTS UNDER THE PROPOSED REZONING, AND THIS WILL NOT ALL BE DEVELOPED AS ONE PROJECT. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED HIM THAT THE BOARD IS CONCERNED ONLY WITH THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE BUILDING OF THE PROJECTS IS NOT UNDER CONSIDERATION TODAY. RAY SCENT, REALTOR, STATED THAT HE HAS NO DIRECT INTEREST IN WESTWOOD SUBDIVISION, BUT HE IS FAMILIAR WITH THE PROJECT AND HE DID ATTEND THE LAST HEARING. HE CONTINUED THAT REFERENCE IS MADE TO DENSITY AS LOW, MEDIUM AND HIGH AND ASKED IF WE ARE TALKING ABOUT POPULATION DENSITY OR UNIT DENSITY. MR. SCENT NOTED THAT IN THE AREA TO THE NORTH - VERO BEACH HOMESITES, EMERSON VILLAGE, ETC., THEY HAVE SMALL LOTS AND SEVEN TO EIGHT UNITS PER ACRE. HE STATED THAT THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT IS FIGURED AT 3.7 WHILE WHERE APARTMENTS ARE CONCERNED, IT IS FIGURED AT 1,8. HE POINTED OUT THAT WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT IS 14 LOTS WHERE THEY ARE ASKING FOR FOUR UNITS PER LOT OR 5.6 UNITS PER GROSS AREA, WHICH IS NO LARGER THAN IS EXISTING IN A SINGLE FAMILY AREA IN THE OLD SUBDIVISIONS NEARBY. HE CONTINUED THAT THE R -2B UNITS REFERRED TO AS BEING 1,000 SQ. FT. EXCEED THE MINIMUM STANDARD REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, WHICH Is 750' SO WE ARE TALKING ABOUT BUILDING AN APARTMENT LARGER THAN MANY HOMES IN THE COUNTY TODAY, MR. SCENT STATED THAT HE WANTS TO SEE THIS COUNTY RETAIN ITS UNIQUE CHARACTER, BUT FELT WE MUST REALIZE THE INCREASE IN COST OF CONSTRUCTION AND INTEREST RATES IS GOING TO PRECLUDE THE POSSIBILITY THAT MANY FAMILIES WILL BE ABLE TO BUY DECENT HOMES IN DECENT AREAS AND THEY WILL HAVE TO RELY ON BUILDERS TO COME UP WITH REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES, HE AGREED WITH THE PLANNING STAFF THAT THE R -2B IS A LOGICAL TRANSITION, AND FELT JUST BECAUSE IT WASN'T DONE YESTERDAY, DOESN'T MEAN WE SHOULDN'T DO IT TODAY. PHILLIP RODDENBERRY, LIFETIME RESIDENT OF THE COUNTY, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS SEEN REBEL ROAD COMPLETELY FLOODED, AND BACK IN 1947, IT WAS NOTHING BUT ABOUT A NINE ACRE POND. HE CONTINUED TO DISCUSS FLOODING PROBLEMS IN THE AREA AND FELT THEY WILL CONTINUE TO OCCUR. HE NOTED THAT AT ONE TIME THEY WANTED TO EXPAND THE TRAILER PARK, AND HE OPPOSED IT. MR. RODDENBERRY STATED THAT HE WAS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT MORE CULVERTS UNDER THE ROAD AND BACKING UP THE FLOW THAN PEOPLE MOVING OUT THERE. HE CONTINUED THAT REBEL ROAD IS 3' HIGHER THAN THE ORIGINAL EARTH, AND IF WE MOVE 55 FAMILIES OUT THERE AND THEN HAVE A FLOOD SUCH AS WE HAD LAST YEAR, IT WILL STOP UP THEIR SEPTIC TANKS. MR. RODDENBERRY NOTED THAT HE HAS NOT BEEN AGAINST THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. WILLIAM HOWARD SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED REZONING. TOM ALDRICH OF REBEL ROAD COMMENTED THAT THE COMMISSION DID NOT ALLOW THE TRAILER PARK TO EXPAND EIGHT YEARS AGO BECAUSE IT WAS AGREED THAT THIS AREA HAD GREAT POTENTIAL TO DEVELOP INTO SOME- THING THE COUNTY WOULD BE PROUD OF. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THERE 59 '600K 43 Pace X02 APR 91980 BouK 43 FA 203 HAVE BEEN OVER ZO CUSTOM HOMES BUILT IN THIS AREA SINCE THE ZONING FOR THE TRAILER PARK WAS TURNED DOWN, AND HE EXPRESSED THE HOPE THAT THE BOARD WOULD ALLOW THIS AREA TO CONTINUE TO DEVELOP ITS POTENTIAL. HE COMMENTED THAT WHEN YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT DENSITY, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE, AND HE FELT IT WOULD BE A TERRIBLE CONTRAST WITH THE AREA IF MR. CHILDERS' PROJECT WERE ALLOWED. MR. ALDRICH COMMENTED THAT MR. CHILDERS' PRESENTATION WAS VERY MISLEADING IN REGARD TO THE COMMERCIAL USAGE IN THE AREA, WHICH HE FELT IS VERY LOW KEY AND NOTHING LIKE U.S. 1. NORMAN HENSICK, JR., INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE DEVELOPED NEARBY MIRAFLORES SUBDIVISION AND OWNS APPROXIMATELY 30 ACRES OF PROPERTY ADJACENT, WHICH HE BOUGHT FOR R-1 ZONING AND PLANS TO DEVELOP IT. THAT WAY. HE STATED THAT HE WAS OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING AND THE CONGESTION IT WILL BRING BY PUTTING 50 SOME FAMILIES ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY WHERE NORMALLY THERE WOULD BE ONLY 14. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE COMMERCIAL ZONING HAS BEEN THERE AS LONG AS HE CAN REMEMBER, AND HE CONCURRED THAT IT IS VERY LOW KEY COMMERCIAL. TOM BAKER WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WOULD BRING TRANSIENT FAMILIES AND UNDESIRABLE PEOPLE AND GAVE AS AN EXAMPLE THE APARTMENTS ON 40TH AVENUE THAT HAVE DILAPIDATED CARS SITTING IN FRONT OF THEM. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER WODTKE INQUIRED ABOUT DEED RESTRICTIONS AND MR. CHISHOLM FELT THEY ARE LIMITED TO ONE RESIDENCE PER HALF ACRE. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IF THE ZONING WERE TO BE CHANGED, THEY WOULD HAVE TO AMEND THE DEED RESTRICTIONS, WHICH HE DID NOT FEEL WOULD PRESENT A PROBLEM. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE IS QUITE FAMILIAR WITH THE AREA, AND HE FELT THAT THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY HAVE A PROBLEM AND ALSO BELIEVED THAT THE OWNERS IN THE AREA HAVE A PROBLEM, AND HE APPRECIATED BOTH SIDES OF THE PICTURE. HE PERSONALLY DID NOT FEEL 60 THAT THE REQUEST TO GO TO R -2B MAY BE THE ANSWER AND WONDERED ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF BEING ABLE TO SATISFY BOTH CONCERNS BY CONSIDERING JUST THE EAST PORTION FOR R -2B AND LEAVING THE WESTERLY HALF OF THE PROPERTY IN THE R-1. IN THIS WAY, THEY WOULD HAVE A BUFFER AGAINST THE COMMERCIAL ON THEIR OWN PIECE OF PROPERTY. HE DID NOT KNOW IF THE BOARD WOULD CONSIDER THIS OR WHETHER I.T WOULD BE A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO THE APPLICANT. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE BOARD HAS THE POWER TO REZONE ONE LOT, ALL LOTS, OR NO LOTS. ATTORNEY BLOCK STATED THAT FROM A LEGAL STANDPOINT, THERE ARE LOTS SOLD ON THE WEST, AND THE ONLY AGENCY THEY HAVE TO REPRESENT THEM FOR IS THE R -2B. HE DID NOT FEEL THEY COULD TELL THESE OWNERS THAT THEY GOT THE R -2B ZONING FOR SOME AND NOT FOR OTHERS. COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT THE PETITIONER MAKING A REAPPLICATION WHEN A ZONING IS TURNED DOWN, AND PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER STATED THAT HE BELIEVED THEY HAVE TO WAIT FOR A YEAR UNLESS THEY COME BACK WITH A DIFFERENT PROPOSAL. HE POINTED OUT THAT IF THIS PROPERTY WERE REZONED TO R -2B AS REQUESTED, IT WOULD BE TREATED ON A BASIS OF SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT TAKING PLACE. HE NOTED THAT THEY COULD REQUIRE AN ADEQUATE BUFFER BETWEEN IT AND ANY OTHER PROPERTIES TO THE WEST. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW WOULD BE FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT, AND MR. REVER STATED THAT IT WOULD COME TO THEM EITHER ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, AND THEY WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH HOWEVER THEY TREATED IT, WHETHER IT CAME AS AN ENTITY OR LOT BY LOT. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE SHARES COMMISSIONER WODTKE'S CONCERN, BUT WHILE IN MANY AREAS BUFFER ZONES ARE GOOD, THE BACKGROUND OF THIS PROPERTY IS THAT THE COMMERCIAL HAS BEEN THERE SINCE YEAR I AND THE RESIDENTIAL HAS BEEN THERE AS LONG. IT IS DEVELOPING AS A RESIDENTIAL SECTION, AND SHE FELT IF WE START THIS BUFFER REZONING, IT UNDOUBTEDLY WOULD IMMEDIATELY BRING ON OTHER REQUESTS. COMMISSIONER 61 BOOK' 43.PAG' 04 - APR 91980 SPR 9190 aoox 43- PAGE 205 Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO FIND A COMPROMISE, BUT SHE WAS NOT COMFORTABLE WITH MAKING ANY CHANGES IN THE REQUEST THAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THE BOARD. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT SOME KIND OF PROGRESSION IS AN ABSOLUTE NECESSITY. HE NOTED THAT SKATETOWN HAS BEEN MENTIONED A GOOD DEAL AND HE WAS GRATEFUL THAT THE PEOPLE WHO RUN IT, OPERATE IT SO WELL, BUT HE POINTED OUT THAT THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO SKATETOWN CANNOT AND WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AS MIRAFLORES SUBDIVISION. HE STATED THAT HE COULD ACCEPT COMMISSIONER WODTKE'S SUGGESTION TO SPLIT THE PROPOSED BUFFER. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD VOTE AGAINST ANY REZONING FOR SEVERAL REASONS. HE FELT SUCH A REZONING WOULD BE CONTRARY TO THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE NEIGHBORS, WHO WERE AWARE THAT IT WAS C-1 ALONG THE STREET, BUT DID NOT EXPECT TO HAVE ANY TRANSI- TIONAL ZONING. HE ALSO FELT THERE WAS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT RAISED ABOUT WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL. COMMISSIONER DEESON FELT THAT IN MOST INSTANCES HE WOULD SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR BUFFER ZONING. HE, HOWEVER, HAD TOURED THE AREA AND OBSERVED THE HOMES BUILT OUT THERE AND THE DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE. HE FELT THE MONEY INVESTED THERE WAS DONE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE WAS COMMERCIAL NEARBY, BUT THEY CERTAINLY DID NOT BUILD THESE HOMES FEELING THAT MULTIPLE FAMILY MIGHT GO IN ON A SMALL TRACT OF LAND BY THE COMMERCIAL. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, TO DENY THE ZONING CHANGE REQUESTED BY MR. CHILDERS FROM R-1 TO R -2B BASED ON THE FACT THAT PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE AREA (65 PEOPLE REPRESENTING ABOUT 210 ACRES) PURCHASED THEIR PROPERTY AND BUILT AWARE OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND DID NOT BUY WITH THE THOUGHT THAT THERE WOULD BE MULTIPLE FAMILY BETWEEN THEM AND THE COMMERCIAL. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THE MOTION IS MADE TO DENY THE REQUEST, AND HE WILL HAVE TO VOTE FOR IT BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST REZONING OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL, HE DOES NOT FEEL REZONING THE WHOLE PROPERTY IS THE ANSWER. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WILL VOTE AGAINST THE MOTION BECAUSE HE FEELS THERE IS A BETTER ALTERNATIVE. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED WITH CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTING IN OPPOSITION. THE REQUEST FOR REZONING WAS DENIED. THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a in the matter of in the lished in said newspaper in the issues of Court, was pub - Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed (SEAL) this_ day of/ A. a O t k/(Business Manager) (Clerk of the Circuit Co &r, Indian River County, Florida) X NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has tentatively ap- proved the following changes and additions to the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, which changes and additions are substantially as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following 70' strip of land situated 660' east of 78th Avenue and 660' South of S.R. 60 in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: The South 70' of the N 730' of the E 20 A of Tr 10, S 1-33-38. Be changed from A -Agricultural District to R-3 Multiple Dwelling District. A public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be, heard, will be held by said Planning and Zoning Commission in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Thursday, February 14, 1980, at 7:30 P.M., after which said public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard will be held by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wed- nesday, April 9,1980, at 2:00 P.M. Board of County Commissioners Indian River County By: W.W. Siebert, Chairman Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission By: Dick Bird, Chairman Jan. 16, 18, 1980. I Boa. ,. 43 PAGEW .. APR 91980 . Boox 43 `P*AcE207 A NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO CARL F. GRAUL BY THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 125,66. COPY OF SAID NOTICE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK. VICKI RENNA OF THE PLANNING STAFF INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A STRIP OF PROPERTY 70' x 650', APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE IN SIZE, AND IT LIES 660' EAST OF 78TH AVENUE AND 660' SOUTH OF S.R. 60. THE APPLICANT WISHES TO REZONE IT FROM A TO R-3 IN ORDER TO UTILIZE IT ALONG WITH HIS ADJOINING R-3 PROPERTY. MISS RENNA CONTINUED THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE PRIMARY CITRUS REGION, AND THE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDS REZONING. SHE NOTED THAT IT ACTUALLY IS PART OF A 19.5 ACRE PARCEL WHICH IS ALL UNDER ONE OWNERSHIP. BECAUSE 30' WAS DEDICATED FOR S.R. 60 DRAINAGE, WHEN THE PROPERTY WAS RESURVEYED, THE OWNER FOUND OUT THAT HE DID NOT HAVE A TOTAL OF 10 ACRES NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT A 150 UNIT PLANNED APARTMENT COMPLEX. THE REMAINDER OF THE ACREAGE IN THE REAR WILL BE FOR RECREATION AND UTILITIES. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER EXPLAINED THAT UNDER THE EXISTING R-3, THEY NEED TEN ACRES TO MEET THE DENSITY REQUIREMENT, AND THEY HAVE TO REZONE THE STRIP TO OBTAIN THE 10 ACRES. THEY WILL LEAVE THE REMAINDER OF THE PARCEL IN AGRICULTURAL AS IT IS PRESENTLY. THE STRIP IS NEEDED BECAUSE OF THE ECONOMIC FACTOR INVOLVED WITH DEVELOP- MENT OF THE PARCEL. MR. REVER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS REZONING WAS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION. DEAN LUETHJE OF CARTER ASSOCIATES WAS PRESENT REPRESENTING CARL GRAUL. HE CONFIRMED THAT MR. GRAUL OWNS 19.5 ACRES AND IN ORDER TO DEVELOP ECONOMICALLY, HE NEEDS 150 UNITS, WHICH REQUIRES A TEN ACRE TRACT. HE JUST NEEDS TO PICK UP THE ONE ACRE TO ACQUIRE THE TEN ACRE TRACT NEEDED IN R-3 ZONING AND WILL LEAVE THE REMAINDER IN ITS PRESENT AGRICULTURAL ZONING, WHERE THEY PLAN TO PUT THE RECREATIONAL AREA, WATER PLANT, SEWER PLANT, JOGGING TRAIL, ETC. THE OVERALL DENSITY WOULD BE ABOUT 7.6. HE NOTED THIS WILL COME UNDER SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 64 FRED BAKER OF BAKER REALTY INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS PRESENTED MR. GRAUL'S PROPERTY TO SOME DEVELOPERS WHO WILL START WORK ON THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. HE ENVISIONED THAT THEY WOULD POSSIBLY FENCE AND PUT A SECURITY GATE SOMEWHERE. THERE WILL BE TEN BUILDINGS WITH WINDING ROADS, AND THEY WILL RENT APARTMENTS AT ABOUT $350. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 80-12 GRANTING THE REZONING TO R-3 REQUESTED BY CARL GRAUL. ORDINANCE NO. 80-12 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto, held a public hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: The South 70' of the N 730' of the E 20 A of Tr 10, S. 1-33-38 Be changed from A -Agricultural District to R-3 Multiple Dwelling District. All within the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Zoning Regulation. This Ordinance shall take effect April 14, 1980. A 65 aoaK. 3' 2n8 PR 91980 L APR 91990 Bou 43 PAq 209 THE HOUR OF 2:00 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being ` a //i. in the matter of le in the lished in said newspaper in the issues of Court, was pub - Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. ��%% Sworn to and subscribed for e thi day of- Lm. A. D.Zf_ (Business Manager) (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Curt, Indian River County, Florida) NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has tentatively ap- proved the following changes and additions to the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, which changes and additions are substantially as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property situated on the south of Citrus Road (4th Street) ap- proximately '/s of a mile west of Kings High- way in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: I The North 660' of. Tract 9, Section 17, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, according to the last general Plat of lands of the Indian River -Farms Company as tiled in Plat Book 2, page 25, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, LESS the West 622.29 feet of the East 647.29 feet thereof and subject to an easement over the North 30 feet thereof for canal. Said land now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida. Be changed from R -IE Country Estate Disfrict to A -Agricultural District. A public hearing in relation thereto at which . parties in interest and citizens shall have an Opportunity to be heard, will be held by said j Planning and Zoning Commission in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Thursday, February 14, 1980, at 7:30 P.M., after which said public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard will be held by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wed- nesday, April 9,1980, at 2:00 P.M. Board of County Commissioners -Indian River County By: W.W. Siebert Chairman Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission By: Dick,Bird, Chairman Jan. 16,18,1980. NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO KENNETH AND SHARON MACKENZIE BY THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 125.66. COPY OF SAID NOTICE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK. VICKI RENNA OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STATED THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 9 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CITRUS ROAD WEST OF KINGS HIGHWAY. THE APPLICANT WISHES TO REZONE FROM R -1E To AGRICULTURAL. SHE NOTED THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SHOWS LOW DENSITY BORDERED BY AGRICULTURAL. 66 THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN CLEARED AND IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED AND VACANT. MISS RENNA NOTED THAT THIS PARCEL IS PART OF AN. SO ACRE TRACT WHICH WAS REZONED FROM A TO R-lE LAST MARCH 21, 1979, UNDER A PREVIOUS OWNER. THE APPLICANT WISHES TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. THIS IS IN KEEPING WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THE REZONING UNANIMOUSLY. CHARLES SULLIVAN, JR., ATTORNEY, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT, KENNETH MACKENZIE, AND REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COM- MISSION. HE NOTED THIS PARCEL IS SURROUNDED BY AGRICULTURE, AND IS PART OF AN 80 ACRE TRACT WHICH IS THE ONLY R-lE IN THIS AGRICUL- TURAL AREA, WHICH IS WITHIN THE PRIMARY CITRUS REGION. MR. SULLIVAN STATED THAT IT IS MR. MACKENZIE'S INTENT TO REPLANT THE GROVE AND PUT THE LAND BACK INTO ITS ORIGINAL USE, WHICH HE FELT WOULD BENEFIT THE AREA. HE NOTED THAT THE ONLY OBJECTION ANYONE HAS RAISED IS IN REGARD TO THE POSSIBILITY OF MR. MACKENZIE PUTTING IN A DOG KENNEL. HE STATED THAT MR. MACKENZIE DOES NOT HAVE THE INTENTION OF PUTTING IN A DOG KENNEL OR AN ATTACK DOG SCHOOL. THE ONLY DOGS HE PLANS ON HAVING ARE HIS OWN PRIVATE PETS; HE MAY BREED DOGS, BUT NO MORE THAN ANY OTHER RESIDENTIAL OWNER. MR. SULLIVAN FELT THAT MR. MACKENZIE'S PROPOSAL IS ADMIRABLE AND SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. ATTORNEY SAM BLOCK APPEARED REPRESENTING HIMSELF AS AN OWNER OF FIVE ACRES IN THIS AREA. HE COMMENTED THAT THE USES MR. SULLIVAN HAS PRESENTED AS BEING MR. MACKENZIE'S INTENT CAN BE CARRIED OUT UNDER THE PRESENT ZONING - HE CAN HAVE A GROVE, BUILD HIS HOUSE, AND HAVE HIS DOGS - SO WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO REZONE BACK TO AGRICULTURAL? MR, BLOCK FELT, AS A PROPERTY OWNER, THAT IF THE BOARD CONTINUES TO FLIP-FLOP BACK AND FORTH WITH ZONING YEAR AFTER YEAR, THERE IS A SERIOUS QUESTION ABOUT WHAT THE ZONING LAWS ARE USED FOR. HE SAW NO REASON WHY THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION SHOULD BE ZONED BACK TO AGRICULTURAL, ESPECIALLY AFTER BEING REZONED TO R-lE SUCH A SHORT TIME AGO. 67 600x 43� ��,� 210 SPR 919�� APP 91980 900K 43 w 2l CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED ATTORNEY SULLIVAN JUST WHAT PURPOSE THERE WAS IN CHANGING THIS ZONING TO AGRICULTURAL IF MR. MACKENZIE'S INTENDED USES ARE EXACTLY AS STATED, AND ATTORNEY SULLIVAN BELIEVED THE MAJOR REASON IS A TAX REASON BECAUSE THE AGRICULTURAL ZONING WOULD RESULT IN LOWER TAXES ON THE PROPERTY. THE CHAIRMAN NOTED THAT AGRICULTURAL ZONING DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN A LOWER ASSESSMENT, AND MR. SULLIVAN COMMENTED THAT MR. MACKENZIE CAN PUT IN A GROVE AND GET THE AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION. COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT IF IT IS A BONA FIDE AGRICULTURAL'OPERATION, YOU CAN GET THE EXEMPTION REGARDLESS OF THE ZONING. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE AD VALOREM TAX LAW HAS CHANGED LATELY, AND IT IS THE USE OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS OVERRIDING, NOT THE ZONING. HE FELT IF MR. MACKENZIE DID PLANT CITRUS, HE PROBABLY WOULD QUALIFY FOR AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION, BUT WITH BARE LAND, HE WOULD NOT, REGARDLESS OF THE ZONING. KENNETH MACKENZIE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WOULD LIKE HIS PARCEL TO BE ZONED BACK TO AGRICULTURAL, AND HE HAD THOUGHT IT WOULD BE A TAX SAVING FOR HIM. HE STATED THAT HE DOES NOT WISH TO SUBDIVIDE, BUT JUST WISHED TO BUILD HIS OWN HOME AND PUT THE TREES BACK, WHETHER CITRUS OR OAK. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE REST OF THE 80 ACRE TRACT, WHICH IS COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY AGRICULTURAL, IS GOING TO BE SUBDIVIDED INTO ONE ACRE HOME SITES, AND HE FELT THIS IS A TOTAL PIECE OF SPOT ZONING DONE BY THE BOARD LESS THAN A YEAR AGO. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WAS TOLD THAT TO PUT IN A BREEDING KENNEL, HE WOULD HAVE TO BE IN AN AGRICULTURAL AREA. MR. MACKENZIE STATED THAT HE ONLY WISHED TO BREED VERY EXPENSIVE DOGS, AND R -IE ONLY ALLOWS FIVE DOGS FOR BREEDING. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT HAVE ATTACK DOGS AND FELT THERE ARE DOGS PRESENTLY LOOSE IN THE NEIGHBOR- HOOD MORE DANGEROUS THAN ANY HE WOULD BREED, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD HAD BEEN INFORMED THAT MR. MACKENZIE DID NOT INTEND TO PUT IN A KENNEL. MR. MACKENZIE STATED THAT HE HAD NOT INTENDED TO DO IT RIGHT NOW, BUT SOME TIME DOWN THE ROAD. IF AGRICULTURAL IS WHAT IT TAKES, HOWEVER, TO PUT A KENNEL OUT THERE, THEN THAT IS WHAT HE WANTS. LAWRENCE BARKETT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE LIVES NEARBY AND STATED HE WAS ASSURED THERE WAS NOT GOING TO BE A DOG KENNEL OR AN ATTACK DOG TRAINING CENTER. IT NOW SEEMS THAT EVERYTHING MR. MACKENZIE ASSURED HIM WAS NOT GOING TO OCCUR APPARENTLY IS GOING TO; S0, HE WILL SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE. MR. BARKETT NOTED THAT ALTHOUGH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY IS ALL IN AGRICULTURAL, HE BELIEVED THAT THERE ARE ABOUT 100 FAMILIES WHO LIVE IN THE VICINITY. MR. BARKETT STATED THAT IF, IN FACT, THERE IS GOING TO BE A CANINE ATTACK TRAINING CENTER, HE WOULD WORRY ABOUT IT GREATLY. HE NOTED THAT WHEN JOEL KEEN SOLD THIS PROPERTY TO MR. MACKENZIE WITH THE CONCRETE SLAB ON IT, THERE WAS TALK ABOUT USING THE SLAB AS A TRAINING CENTER. THIS CANNOT BE DONE WITH THE R-lE ZONING. MR. BARKETT FELT SUCH AN ENTERPRISE WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS A SCHOOL BUS STOP NEAR THIS PARCEL, HE FELT CHANGING ONE CORNER OF THE R-lE To A WOULD BE SPOT ZONING, AND HE OPPOSED IT. REED KNIGHT, .JR., PROPERTY OWNER IN THE AREA, DID NOT FEEL THE MAP IS QUITE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE AREA AND NOTED THAT THE R-lE BEING DISCUSSED IS THE TIP OF A COMPLETE SUBDIVISION. HE FELT THAT THE AGRICULTURAL AREA IS BEING PRESSURED INTO R-1. MR. KNIGHT CONTINUED THAT HE IS FAMILIAR WITH GREEN BELT LAWS AND NOTED THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED FOR THREE TIMES MORE THAN ITS GREEN BELT ASSESSMENT AND THEREBY HAS LOST THAT EXEMPTION EVEN IF MR. MACKENZIE DOES PUT IN THE CITRUS TREES. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED HIM THAT THIS IS NO LONGER TRUE. MR. KNIGHT DID NOT BELIEVE THAT ANYONE CAN MAKE MONEY ON CITRUS BY PAYING $6,000 AN ACRE FOR THE LAND. HE CONTINUED THAT A PROPERTY OWNER OUT ON OSLO CAME BEFORE THE BOARD ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO ASKING FOR A REZONING TO AGRICULTURAL FOR HIS KENNEL, AND HE •• BOOK 43 PAGE 2� APR 91990 mox 43 PAUE213 DID NOT OPPOSE THAT REZONING BECAUSE HE FELT A KENNEL IS MORE OF A COMMERCIAL USE THAN AN AGRICULTURAL USE AND THE PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THAT PROPOSED KENNEL WERE ALL COMMERCIAL. MR. MACKENZIE'S REQUEST IS FOR REZONING TO PUT A KENNEL IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA, AND HE, THEREFORE, WOULD OPPOSE THE REZONING. JOEL KEEN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE OWNS THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE SO ACRE R-lE TRACT AND IT WAS AT HIS REQUEST THAT THE BOARD REZONED THIS TO R-lE ABOUT A YEAR AGO. MR. KEEN STATED THAT MR. MACKENZIE WAS AWARE OF THE ZONING AT THE TIME OF HIS PURCHASE, AND CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD OPPOSE ANY CHANGE IN THE ZONING. FRANCES GRAVES STATED THAT SHE DID NOT WISH TO BE IN A VICINITY WITH ATTACK DOGS, AND QUESTIONED IF MR. MACKENZIE STARTED OUT WITH A FEW DOGS, WHERE IT WOULD END UP, SHE OPPOSED THE REZONING, EILEEN FARLEY QUESTIONED WHY MR. MACKENZIE WOULD SPEND $7,000 AN ACRE FOR A HOME SITE AND THEN ALL AT ONCE WANT TO RAISE TREES ON BURNT-OUT LAND. SHE BEGGED THE BOARD NOT TO CHANGE THE ZONING. ATTORNEY SULLIVAN STATED THAT HE FELT THESE ARGUMENTS ABOUT ATTACK DOGS ARE SPECIOUS. HE NOTED THAT IF MR. MACKENZIE HAS THE AGRICULTURAL ZONING, HE CAN ONLY PUT ONE HOUSE ON HIS LAND AND THAT IS WHAT HE WANTS TO DO. HE FELT THAT IN ITSELF IS A SUFFICIENT BASIS FOR THE REQUEST. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT SINCE MR. MACKENZIE OWNS THE LAND, NO ONE ELSE CAN PUT ANOTHER HOUSE ON IT ANYWAY. COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT THIS BOARD, IN THEIR BEST JUDGMENT, FELT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THAT LAND WAS TO CHANGE THE WHOLE TRACT TO R -IE JUST ABOUT A YEAR AGO, AND SHE HAS NOT HEARD ANYTHING TODAY THAT WOULD MAKE HER FEEL THAT TO CUT A SMALL CORNER OUT OF THE TRACT AND CHANGE IT TO AGRICULTURAL WOULD BE THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE LAND. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. 70 � 0 � ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE REQUEST OF KENNETH MACKENZIE TO REZONE FROM R-lE To A ON THE BASIS THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS REZONED A YEAR AGO TO R-lE; REZONING IT AGAIN WOULD BE CONSIDERED CAPRICIOUS; AND THE BOARD HAS BEEN PRESENTED NO REAL REASON FOR THE CHANGE IN THE ZONING. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT THE BOARD WOULD AT'THIS TIME HAVE A REPORT IN REGARD TO THE PLANNED RENOVATION OF THE COURT- HOUSE, ANNEX AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND HOW THIS CAN BE CARRIED OUT. HE HOPED THE BOARD WOULD BE ABLE TO DECIDE ON ONE OF THE ALTERNATIVES RECOMMENDED BY THE ADMINISTRATO,R AND THEN TURN IT ALL OVER TO HIM TO HANDLE. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING MEMO FROM THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND THE ALTERNATIVES PRESENTED THEREIN: 0 71 BooK� � - �PacE ��� APR X00 APR 91990 - - 0 mpmnR 4Nnl im TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: County Administrator Bnox 43- PaCE 215. . April 9, 1980 SUBJECT: Renovation of Court House, Annex and County Admin. Building A meeting was held with Reinhold Construction representatives and County representatives, Wednesday April 2, 1980. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss renovatinj areas. The Contractor would like to start both renovation projects -simultaneously, April 21, 1980-. The contract allows this, however, the contract also states our work will not be disrupted. The starting date of Aoril 21, poses no problem at the Old Hospital site. There is a tremendous logistic problem at the Court House regardless of the beginning date. Reinhold construction plan of renovation designates the North East corner, first floor (Administrative area) and the Southern 2/3rds of the second floor as early demolition areas. The demolition of the covered ramp and the construction of the elevator would also be in the early stages. Their plan can be supported, however, it will require the utmost cooperation between all parties and the rental of additional office space, court room and hearing rooms on a temporary basis. There are three alternatives to the renovating of these buildings. ALT. 1 Begin simultaneously renovating of both sites - extend the Court House contract to coincide with the Administrative building. This would require: Rental of additional office space for the County Administrator's office and staff including the Secretary to the Board of C. C. (2,000 sq. ft.) The Supervisor of Elections ( 900 sq. ft.) The Sheriff's Office (1,425 sq. ft.) Youth Guidance -Office, (155 sq. ft.) and the Courts, (6,000 sq. ft.) Freda Wright will redistribute her personnel to facilitate renovating of her spaces. The Tax Collector and Property Appraiser's area will not be renovated until they are relocated. The Courts pose the greatest problem to the alternative. The Judges are concerned that demolition and construction will interferewith their conducting court and hearings. The most affected area would be those courts that require verbatim recordings of the proceedings. Another area of concern is the security of sensitive hearings, such as adoption, child abuse, etc. If the alternative was selected, appropriate space would be required to hold court and hearings. Advantaqe: 1. Earliest completion of both buildings. Disadvantaqe: 1. Maximum rental requirements 2. Maximum disruption of office procedures 3. Escalating of cost to extend contract Estimated cost to support these alternatives is as follows: Alt. 1 Costs Rental of additional space .. 1. Administrator/Staff and Sec. Board of C.C. 2,000 2. Supervisor of Elections 900 3. Sheriff 1,400 4. Judge Stikelether and staff 2,145 5. County Court Room space 1,472 6. Circuit Judges and staff 1,291 7. Court space 1,536 Total Space 10,744 ,dost per month: 10,744 X $6.00 :-12 = $5,372 Moving cost $2,000 Construction cost $3,000 Cost for 9 months rental $53,348 Cost of extended rents 6,450 General Contractor, 6 months extending time Annex only estimate $137,800 Total cost Alt. for 9 months $191,148 11 Is 11 " 12 months $197,598 ALT 2 Renovate Old Hospital Building first then renovate Court House and Annex. Advantage I. Least disruption of work. Will require a disruption in the Court,and problem areas identified in Alt. 1 are the same in this Alternative. 2. Minimum rental cost (court only) 6,000 sq. ft. Disadvanta es: 1. Cost of the delayed renovating undetermined. 2. Prolong completion of Court House up to 24 months. 3. May cause a rebid situation. ALT 3 Simultaneously renovation of Old Hospital and Court House only. Annex eliminate from contract and complete at a later date. This would provide the same advantages and disadvantages of ALT. 1, however, maximum effort could be concentrated in completing Court House. Would probably have to rebid Annex Building. I would recommend Alternative 3, 1, and then 2. jr R 91980 43 FacE l6 AP _ . _APR 9 i9�o _ - - - - swx . 43. pAt 2.17 I' MR. NELSON STATED THAT HE HAS IDENTIFIED SPACE HE CAN RENT FOR THE COURT SYSTEM AND WORK COULD BE STARTED ON THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AT ONCE. HE RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACT . WITH REINHOLD BE SIGNED TO START IMMEDIATELY ON THE RENOVATION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND TO WORK ON THE COURTHOUSE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD HAD PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED THE NECESSITY FOR SOME SHUFFLING OF PERSONNEL AND NOW WE ARE READY TO G0, AND THIS HAS NOT BEEN WORKED OUT, HE FELT WE. -HAVE TO BITE THE BULLET AND GO WITH ALTERNATIVE #3 BECAUSE WE CANNOT DISRUPT THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM. THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT HE DOES NOT LIKE HAVING TO SPEND MONEY FOR RENTALS, BUT IT WAS ANTICIPATED THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO AT SOME POINT. HE NOTED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR MUST COORDINATE WITH THE JUDGES TO MAKE SURE THE FACILITIES ARE ADEQUATE FOR THEIR NEEDS. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER LOY, TO ACCEPT ALTERNATE #3 AS SET OUT IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS MEMO DATED APRIL 9, 1980, AND PROVIDE WHATEVER IS NEEDED TO CARRY ON ALL COUNTY OPERATIONS. COMMISSIONER Loy WISHED TO BE SURE WE HAVE AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS, BUT THAT WE HAVE CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THOSE WHO HAVE TO BE MOVED. SHE NOTED THAT WE ALL HAVE TO SUFFER A LITTLE IN THE RENOVATION PROCESS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOME INDICATION FROM-THtE_CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AS TO WHETHER THEY FEEL WE ARE HEADED IN T-HE"RIGHT DIRECTION. THE CLERj< AND THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS VOICED NO OBJECTIONS AND INDICATED THEY WOULD TRY TO COORDINATE WITH THE NECESSARY MOVING OF PERSONNEL. PUBLIC DEFENDER ELTON SCHWARZ STATED THAT HE AND STATE ATTORNEY STONE ARE NOT AFFECTED AND HAVE NO OBJECTION. THEY HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THE ANNEX BEING PUT AT THE END OF THE CONTRACT, BUT REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD NOT FORGET ABOUT IT. THE LAW LIBRARY COULD BE A PROBLEM. 116 HE DID NOTE THAT m COUNTY JUDGE GRAHAM STIKELETHER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE APPRECIATED THE APPROACH BEING TAKEN. HE THEN WENT ON TO DISCUSS THE TRANSFER OF THE CLERK'S PERSONNEL, NOTING THAT THE SIX CLERKS IN THE TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU MUST BE WHERE THE COURT IS AND THERE ARE AN ENORMOUS NUMBER OF FILES THAT MUST BE MOVED. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE SMALL CLAIM COURT CLERK MUST BE MOVED WITH THE COURTS. ALSO THE CIRCUIT JUDGES HAVE FOUR SUPPORT COURT EMPLOYEES AND THEIR FILES WHICH SHOULD BE NEAR THE COURTROOMS. THE .JUDGE EXPLAINED THE OPERATION IN REGARD TO THE CIVIL COURT FILES IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE, HOW THE FILES ARE PULLED, AND THE NEED TO BRING ABOUT 400 FILES TO THE COURTS WEEKLY. HE DISCUSSED THE POSSIBIL_I.TY OF HAVING A MESSENGER PICK UP AND DISTRIBUTE THE FILES. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THE BOARD IS TELLING THEIR STAFF TO INITIATE A RELOCATION THAT WILL MEET THE MINIMUM NEEDS OF ALL THE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS. JUDGE STIKELETHER NEXT INFORMED THE BOARD OF HIS NEED FOR A ROOM TO STORE THE COURT TAPES, WHICH MUST BE KEPT INDEFINITELY AND SHOULD BE KEPT IN A COOL, DRY PLACE WITH SHELVING AND LIMITED ACCESS. PROVINCE. THE CHAIRMAN FELT THIS ALL FALLS UNDER THE ADMINISTRATOR'S THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. JUDGE STIKELETHER STATED THAT HE FELT THE BOARD HAD MADE A GOOD DECISION IN GOING WITH THE THIRD ALTERNATIVE. HE FURTHER NQTED'THAT THE COST OF THE RENT WOULD BE PARTIALLY OFFSET BY NOT HAVING TO PAY TO SET UP A NEW TAPE SYSTEM FOR THE COURTS, AND HE ADDITIONALLY FELT PURSUING THIS ALTERNATIVE WILL SPEED UP THE RENOVATION. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THAT WE NEED TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WHICH WAS APPROVED EARLIER CONTINGENT ON THE SITE PLAN BEING ACCEPTED. COMMISSIONER LAY AGREED THE CHAIRMAN HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SIGN, BUT ASKED IF WE DO RIOT HAVE JUST A FEW DAYS TO GET GOING ONCE IT IS SIGNED. 43 pw218 - APR 9 198 APR 91980 - - - - - BOOK 43 PAGE 219 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE HERCULES KONTOULAS STATED THAT WE HAVE 60 DAYS AFTER THE AWARD OF THE BIDS, AND APRIL 21ST WOULD BE 61 DAYS. ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THERE NEEDS TO BE ANOTHER MEETING WITH THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SIGNING AND AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. HE AGREED THAT WE HAVE THE AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACTS AS SOON AS THE DETAILS ARE WORKED OUT, BUT HE WOULD RATHER NOT SEE THE BOARD EXECUTE THE CONTRACTS RIGHT NOW. HE REQUESTED THAT MR. NELSON SET UP A MEETING FOR FRIDAY WITH THE CONTRACTOR, THE CHAIRMAN AND HIMSELF. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THAT WHEN THE ATTORNEY INDICATES EVERYTHING IS ALL RIGHT, THE CHAIRMAN CAN SIGN WITHOUT ANY FURTHER AUTHORIZATION. RALPH ENG OF THE JOINT VENTURE AND TOM TESSIER OF GERAGHTY & MILLER CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO GIVE A PROGRESS REPORT ON THE SOUTH COUNTY TAX DISTRICT WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, AND MR. ENG PASSED OUT THE FOLLOWING PROJECTED TIME SCHEDULE: TABLE IV SOUTH MUNICIPAL TAX DISTRICT -WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT SCHEDULE (REVISED APRIL 9, 1980) JOB NOS. 6858 8 6674 TIME SCHEDULE 1979 1980 1981 MAJOR TASKS DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. I. FmHA Funding Committed 2. Test Well Program 3. Authorization Final Design 4. Land Purchase Option-Well/Trt. Pt. — 8 Elevated Tank **** 5. Transmission/ Distribution/Elev. Tank Design ********************* 6. Well Field/ Treatment Plant Design************************* 7. Well/Consumptive Use Permits ***************************** 8. DER -Construction Permits ******** 9. FEC/DOT/Other Permits****************** 10. Advertise/ Receive Bids ************ ll. Legal/Bond Validation/Interim Financing 12. Award Contract(s) Begin/Complete Construction 12 months **'11*** MR. ENG INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE TEST WELL PROGRAM IS STARTED AND ON SCHEDULE. MR. TESSIER REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE BEEN PERFORMING TASKS 1 AND 2 OF THEIR PROPOSAL, WHICH INCLUDES AN INVENTORY OF WELLS, PERMITS AND WATER USERS IN THE VICINITY OF THE TAXING DISTRICT AND PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND BID FORM FOR CONTRACT. THEY HAVE ESSENTIALLY COMPLETED THE INVENTORY WORK AND HAVE FOUND THAT THERE ARE VERY FEW WELLS WITHIN THE TAXING DISTRICT FOR WHICH THERE ARE RECORDS. THERE ARE NO KNOWN WELLS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROSPECTIVE WELLFIELD AREA WHICH COULD BE USED FOR THE OBSERVATION WELL, THEY DID FIND THAT THERE ARE A CONSIDERABLE NUMBER OF WELLS OUTSIDE THE TAXING DISTRICT AND SUSPECT THERE ARE WELLS IN THE DISTRICT FOR WHICH THERE ARE NO RECORDS; THE ONLY WAY TO IDENTIFY THESE WOULD BE A DOOR TO DOOR SEARCH. OUTSIDE THE TAXING DISTRICT IN THE AGRICULTURAL AREA, THEY HAVE FOUND THERE IS AN AVERAGE OF ONE FLOWING WELL FOR EVERY 23 ACRES OF PROPERTY OR 30 FLOWING WELLS PER SQUARE MILE. MR. TESSIER STATED THAT THERE WOULD BE A CONSIDER- ABLE NUMBER OF WELLS THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED BY SOME EXTENT BY THE DIVERSION, AND THAT WILL BE FURTHER DEFINED AT THE END OF THE TESTING PROGRAM. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS BEEN WORKING ON SPECIFI- CATIONS WHICH THEY WILL HAVE FOR THE COUNTY NEXT WEEK. HE NOTED THEY ALSO HAVE TO SEND A COPY OF THE SPECIFICATIONS TO THE ST. JOHN'S RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND A LETTER REQUESTING WAIVER OF CERTAIN DISTRICT PROCEDURE SO THEY CAN PUT IN A PRODUCTION WELL AND GET THE PROGRAM ROLLING AND THE CONTRACTOR ON LINE. MR. TESSIER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE'CONTACTED SOME OF THE MOST QUALIFIED WELL CONTRACTORS IN THE AREA, WHO HAVE LOOKED AT SOME OF THE PRELIMINARY SPECIFICATIONS AND GIVEN THEM FREBI,I?UNG ESTIMATE PRICES. ON THE TYPE 2 WELL - THE PRODUCTION WELL WITH. THE MONITORING TUBE, THE MEDIAN ESTIMATED COST WAS $02,500. MR. TESSIER NEXT DISCUSSED THE VARIOUS CONFIGURATION OF WELLS SUG- GESTED IN SCENARIO 2 AND SCENARIO 3, NOTING THAT SCENARIO 2 CALLS 77 ' V• APR 9 i0 as . 4 PAGi 220 L _ 3mx 43 PAGE.2.21 FOR ONE PRODUCTION WELL, ONE OBSERVATION WELL, AND ONE DEEP MONITOR- ING -WELL WHILE SCENARIO 3 WOULD HAVE TWO PRODUCTION WELLS AND ONE F OBSERVATION WELL. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE FELT EVEN THE INITIAL SYSTEM WILL NEED TWO PRODUCTION WELLS BEFORE IT CAN OPERATE AND CONTINUED THAT EVEN IF THE FINAL DIVERSION WERE TO BE APPROVED AT ONLY 80% OF WHAT THE COUNTY WAS REQUESTING, THERE STILL WOULD BE A NEED FOR TWO PRODUCTION WELLS. HE, THEREFORE, FELT IT WOULD BE ADVISABLE TO GO WITH SCENARIO 3 AND NOTED THAT THEY CANT FINALIZE THE SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL THE BOARD MAKES THIS DECISION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH MAKING ANY DECISION AT THIS TIME BECAUSE THE BOARD IS BEING ASKED TO SPEND OVER $100,000; THEY WERE JUST HANDED THIS INFORMATION FIVE MINUTES AGO; AND THIS WAS AGENDAED AS A PROGRESS REPORT, MR. ENG STATED THAT HE DID NOT REALIZE MR. TESSIER HAD INTENDED TO ASK FOR ANY DECISION AT THIS TIME, AND HE SUGGESTED THAT THEY BID TWO ALTERNATIVES TO SEE HOW THEY CAME OUT AND THEN MAKE THE DECISION. MR. TESSIER AGREED THIS COULD BE DONE SINCE HE HAD THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THREE DIFFERENT TYPES OF WELLS, BUT IT WOULD SIMPLIFY THE BIDDING PROCESS IF THE BOARD COULD MAKE THE DECISION BEFORE HAND. COMMISSIONER LYONS POINTED OUT THAT THE BOARD DOESN'T EVEN HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FROM THEIR CONSULTANTS, AND HE DID NOT WANT TO MAKE A DECISION_ TODAY ; - - ATTORNEY _COLLINS INQUIRED ABOUT PLANS IN REGARD TO THE SITE. MR. ENG NOTED THAT THEIR TIME SCHEDULE PROJECTED ADVERTISING FOR BID ON THE TEST WELLS SOMETIME AROUND MAY 5TH, AND THEY WOULD HOPE TO GET INTO CONSTRUCTION OF THE TEST WELLS IN JUNE, HE STATED THAT HE HAS NOT HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW IN DETAIL THE PROPOSAL WHICH MR. TESSIER HAS PUT TOGETHER, BUT WOULD HOPE DURING THE TECHNI- CAL PREPARATION OF THE BIDDING PROCESS TO REVIEW THIS AND THEN MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. MR. ENG COMMENTED THAT HE HAD ONLY INTENDED TO GIVE A PROGRESS REPORT TODAY. HE DID NOTE THAT THE PROJECTED COST IS WELL WITHIN THE ESTIMATED COST FOR THE -BUDGET. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY HAVE MADE INITIAL CONTACTS IN REGARD TO LOCATION OF A SITE AND ARE HOPING TO HAVE SOME FIRM COMMITMENTS FROM LAND OWNERS WILLING TO WORK OUT AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY FOR THE BOARD TO REVIEW BY THE END OF APRIL. ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO GET OPTIONS, AND MR. ENG STATED THAT THEY WILL TRY TO SHOOT FOR EITHER THE LAST MEETING IN APRIL OR THE FIRST ONE IN MAY. HE NOTED THAT THEY HAVE DONE THE DISTRIBUTION DESIGN. HE FURTHER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE TEST WELL PROGRAM, GERAGHTY R MILLER IS GOING TO SUBMIT A REQUEST TO ST. .JOHN'S RIVER 14ATER MANAGE- MENT DISTRICT FOR A CONSUMPTIVE USE PERMIT. EVEN THOUGH THIS PERMIT CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL THE TEST WELL IS COMPLETED, THEY FEEL THEY SHOULD GET STARTED WITH THE PROCESS NOW. -ALL OTHER_PER.MITS COME LATER. MR. ENG STATED THAT THEY ARE STILL SHOOTING TOWARDS COMPLETION OF DESIGN AND BEING READY TO GO TO BID AROUND NOVEMBER OR DECEMBER OF THIS YEAR, AND THE COUNTY SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE WILL BE A NEED FOR INTERIM FINANCING OF UP TO $100,000 - $150,000 BY ABOUT MID JUNE. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF THE COST OF THE LAND SHOULD BE ADDED, AND MR. ENG FELT YOU CAN JUST GET AN OPTION AND THEN CLOSE THE DEAL LATER ON WHEN YOU GO TO CONSTRUCTION. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE COUNTY TAKING OVER CERTAIN EXISTING FRANCHISES IN THE AREA, AND BEFORE WE GET INTO CONSTRUCTION, THOSE AGREEMENTS MUST BE TERMINATED. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT WE HAVE BEEN TALKING WITH VISTA PROPERTIES, AND THEY WOULD LIKE TO KEEP CONTROL OF THEIR SYSTEM UNTIL 60 DAYS PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE COUNTY PROJECT. MR. ENG FELT IT MIGHT SATISFY FMHA REQUIREMENTS IF THE COUNTY HADA FIRM AGREEMENT STATING THAT ONCE THE COUNTY SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL, THE FRANCHISE COULD BE TAKEN OVER. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE NEEDS TO HAVE THIS CLARIFIED AND DETERMINED BEFORE THE NEXT MEETING. MR. ENG INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD SOME GOOD NEWS. EVEN THOUGH PRESIDENT CARTERS PLAN TO CUT BACK INFLATION CALLS FOR AN INCREASE IN THE INTEREST ON FMHA LOANS, THE COUNTY WAS FORTUNATE TO 79 APR 91880 eoo. 4 .1 2 . 1 ► :i `t � � '�i OBTAIN THEIR_ _ a�oA 43 QAu3 LOAN IN FEBRUARY, AND ALSO THE 20 MILLION DOLLAR COMMITMENT IS EXEMPT AND WILL STAND AT; 5%. W MR. ENG STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE MR. TESSIER TO PRESENT TO THE BOARD AHEAD OF THE NEXT MEETING THE ENTIRE CONTRACT DOCUMENT TO REVIEW, AND AT THE NEXT MEETING, HE THEN CAN GIVE THE CONSULTANT S RECOMMENDATION AND THE BOARD CAN GIVE AUTHORIZATION TO BID. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE PROPOSAL MADE BY ARTHUR WILSON FOR REMOVAL OF AUSTRALIAN PINES ON INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY WEST OF HOBART LANDING AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR, WHICH IS AS FOLLOWS: April 2, 1980 MEMO TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: [avid M. Rever, Planning & Zoni.ng Director SUBJECT: Proposed removal of Australian Pines on Indian River Blvd. R.O.W. west of Hobart Landing As requested by the County Administrator, the following is a summary of the Planning staff's review of the proposed linear landscaping plan for property abutting Indian River Blvd. immediately west of Hobart Landing. Generally the staff is in concurrance with the proposal in that it would create a more aesthetic buffer area and decrease anticipated future maintenance problems for the County. The landscaping plan does., in..staff's opinion, compliment the existing plantings in Hobart Landing; however, the proposed materials should possibly be changed to provide for faster -growing varieties which will help maintain a reasonable amount of -privacy -and separation for existing residents at Hobart. Additionally, it is felt that the plant materials should be re- tained on the Wilson-prorperty with encroachment of trees on to the right- of-way kept to a maximum of 12 feet. The attached cross-section does note this stipulation. Copies of the preliminary landscaping plan are also enclosed. Finally a list of fast -growth vegetation and tree varieties is provided for possible substitution. TREES: 1) Ficus nitida 2) Callistemon viminalis 3) Nervan oleander 4) Miniosopes SHRUBS: 1) Ficus benjamina 2) Cortaderia selloana 3) Viburnum odoratissimum Should you have any additional questions or comments, please advise. � � r MR. REVER NOTED THAT ESSENTIALLY THERE ARE SEVERAL ROWS OF AUSTRALIAN PINES, AND MR. WILSON WISHES TO REMOVE THESE AND RELAND- SCAPE THE ENTIRE STRIP WITH MORE VARIED AND LONG TERM TYPE VEGETATION. COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHY THESE PLANTINGS SHOULD BE PUT BACK ON THE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MR. REVER NOTED THAT THEY ARE ONLY PROPOSING THAT SOME TREES,AND NO OTHER VEGETATION,ENCROACH TO A CERTAIN EXTENT IN ORDER TO HAVE A VARIED AFFECT INSTEAD OF A STRAIGHT LINE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD RATHER TAKE OUT A BUSH THAN A TREE. HE NOTED THAT A LIMIT OF 12' HAS BEEN SET FOR ENCROACHMENT ON THE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH IS A VERY WIDE RIGHT- OF-WAY. COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT THE PEOPLE IN HOBART LANDING ARE VERY UPSET ABOUT CUTTING THE PINES DOWN, BUT HE FELT THAT MR. WILSON'S PROPOSAL WILL PARTIALLY PLACATE THEM. MR. REVER AGREED THAT MR. WILSON WILL PUT IN ANOTHER BUFFER TO REPLACE THE PINES AND COMMENTED THAT ACTUALLY AUSTRALIAN PINES ARE NOTHING BUT A DETRIMENT FROM THE COUNTY'S POINT OF VIEW. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS CONFIRMED THAT THERE IS A DENSE GROWTH OF VERY LARGE AUSTRALIAN PINES AT THIS LOCATION, THE BULK OF WHICH ARE ON MR. WILSON -'S PROPERTY, AND WHILE THEY DO PROVIDE A SCREEN FOR THE PEOPLE IN HOBART LANDING, THEY ARE LARGE AND DANGEROUS AND SHOULD BE REMOVED. THE ADMINISTRATOR FELT,IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE COUNTY EVENTUALLY WILL BE FACED WITH THE PROBLEM OF HAVING TO REMOVE THESE TREES, THAT WE WOULD BE MUCH BETTER OFF TO GET R.ID OF THEM NOW THAT A DEVELOPER HAS PRESENTED US WITH A PLAN AND WILL REPLANT WITH PROPER TREES AND PLANTINGS, WHICH IT WILL BE HIS RE- SPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN. HE SUGGESTED THAT MR. WILSON SHOULD ESCROW A CASH DEPOSIT SUFFICIENT TO GUARANTY COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS FELT THAT THE 12' LIMIT SUGGESTED FOR ENCROACHMENT INTO THE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY IS AN ARBITRARY FIGURE AND HE DID NOT NECESSARILY AGREE WITH MEASURING THIS DISTANCE FROM THE TRUNK OF THE TREE, BUT FELT THAT THIS CAN BE WORKED OUT. 81 mf i BOOK 43 RAGE '4 - - APR 91990 - - -- - - - - BOOK 43 QAU 225 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ACCEPT THE CONCEPT OF THE PRO- POSAL MADE BY ARTHUR WILSON FOR REMOVAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN PINES IN THE VICINITY OF HOBART LANDING AND AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO COME BACK TO THE BOARD WITH A FINALIZED PLAN TO BE APPROVED. DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO WHETHER TO TRY TO DEAL WITH ALL THE MATTERS ON THE AGENDA AT THIS TIME OR TO CONTINUE THE MEETING UNTIL TOMORROW. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD, WITH REGARD TO ITEM 22A REVIEWING THE NORTH COUNTY ANNEXATIONS, THAT HE WOULD HOPE THE BOARD WOULD REVIEW THE PRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR AND THEN WAIT FOR THE ATTORNEY'S RECOMMENDATION AFTER HIS MEETING WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY. THE BOARD AGREED, AND ITEM 22A WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE AGENDA. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED THAT COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUBMIT A REPORT IN WRITING ON THE SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT AND THAT THIS MATTER BE HELD OVER AND TAKEN UP EARLY AT THE NEXT MEETING. CHAIRMAN SEIBERT COMMENTED THAT ON THE OCCASIONS WHEN THERE ARE THREE WEEKS BETWEEN MEETINGS, THE AGENDA BECOMES VERY CUMBERSOME, AND HE FELT THE BOARD SHOULD GIVE SOME CONSIDERATION TO GOING TO BI -WEEKLY MEETINGS. AT THIS TIME, HOWEVER, HE SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD CONTINUE AND TRY TO COMPLETE TODAY'S AGENDA. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDS,.T-HAT THE EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK A, OSLO PARK, UNIT 2.,.BE RELEASED AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT O'NEAL, AS PER THE FOLLOWING MEMO: � � r March 28, 1980 TO: Jack Jennings, County Administrator FROM: David Marsh, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Easement Release Request This request for the release of the 10' public utility and drainage easement lying between Lots 1 and 2, Block A, Oslo Park, Unit 2 have been reviewed favorably by the following agencies: Southern Bell Telephone Company Florida Power & Light Utilities Department Based on the responses and staff analysis, it is recommended that the easement be released as the existing Swale on the east lot line currently provides sufficient drainage. Additional area for drainage and/or utilities could be provided on the rei�r lot line easement. ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT THE RELEASE OF EASEMENT IS IN PROPER FORM. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 80-36 RELEASING THE LOT LINE EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOT I AND LOT 2, BLOCK A, OSLO PARK, UNIT 2, AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT AND BRENDA O'NEAL AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN TO THE RELEASE OF EASEMENT. 83, APR 9 NO BOOK � 'PAGE L APR 91990 aeoK 43 PAGE 22-7 RESOLUTION NO. 80-36 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, have been requested to release the lot line easements on the south five (5) feet of Lot 1, and the north five (5) feet of Lot 2, Block A, Oslo Park, Unit 2, according to the Plat of same recorded in Plat Book 4, page 13, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, said lot line easements were dedicated on the Plat of Oslo Park, Unit 2, for public utility purposes; and WHEREAS, the request for such release of easement has been submitted in proper form; NOW, THERE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following lot line easements in Oslo Park, Unit 2, shall be released, abandoned and vacated as follows: The south five (5) feet of Lot 1; and the north five (5) feet of Lot 2, Block A, Oslo Park, Unit 2, according to the Plat of the same filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, in Plat Book 4, at page 13. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court be and they hereby are authorized and directed to execute a release of said lot line easements hereinabove referred to in form proper for recording and placing in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. This 9th day of April , 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Freda Wright, Cl irk RELEASE OF EASEMENT This Release of Easement, executed this 9th day of April 1980, by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, first party; to Robert L. O'Neal and Brenda O'Neal, whose mailing address is 154 20th Place, S.W., Vero Beach, Indian River Eounty, Florida, second party: WITNESSETH: That the said party of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by the said second party, does hereby remise, release, abandon, and quit claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described easement, lying on land situate in the County of Indian River County, State of Florida, to -wit: The south five (5) feet of Lot 1; and the north five (5) feet of Lot 2, Block A, Oslo Park, Unit 2, a subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 13, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining and all estate, right, title, interest, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party either in law or equity to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents by the parties so authorized by the law the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: ,✓ C �� W. W. Slo. ber , J , Ohairmu Attes t: Freda Wright, 1C er' 9 �, t f STATE OF FLORIDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY THIS IS TO CERT;FY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CJRRECT COPY OF THE C;M1OiNAL (),N FILL IN THIS OFFICE. FREDA WRIGHT, CLERIK BY &VA^,A A p DATE/0 -000 s APR 9 198 .229 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements personally appeared, W. W. SIEBERT, JR., as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and FREDA WRIGHT, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, to me known to be the persons duly authorized by said County to execute the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same for and on behalf of the said political subdivision. WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 9th day. of April , 1980. ,Notary Seal) ,r Notary Pic, State of Flod4a at Large. My commi Sion expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STAT! O' ftn-RIIDA AT lA= 90.% D TNRU GEN:R`.l INS U14DERWRITERS ITEM 22 B.1, A REQUEST BY CHRISTOPHER EKONOMOU FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 17 AND 18, BLOCK B, OSLO PARK, WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA ON THE ADVICE OF THE ATTORNEY AS THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN REGARD TO HIS TITLE TO THE PROPERTY WERE NOT IN PROPER FORM. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THERE ALSO WAS A PROBLEM WITH ITEM 22 B.2, A REQUEST BY CHARLIE BATTLES FOR A RELEASE OF EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 13 AND 14, BLOCK 2, KINGS MUSIC LAND SUBDIVISION, IN THAT THE STATEMENT FROM THE TITLE COMPANY NEEDED TO BE CLARIFIED, AND HE ADVISED THAT THIS ITEM SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA UNTIL THE APPLICANT CAN PROVIDE A PROPER STATEMENT FROM THE TITLE COMPANY. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER REPORTED THAT THE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 17 AND 18, BLOCK K, OSLO PARK, UNIT 2, BE RELEASED AS REQUESTED BY ROBERT .JAMES SCOTT, AS PER THE FOLLOWING MEMO: MEMO March 28, 1980 TO: Jack Jennings, County Administrator FROM: David Marsh, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Easement Release Request This request for the release of the 5' public utility and drainage easement on the common side lot line of Lots 17 and 18, Block K, Oslo Park, Unit 2 has been reviewed by the following agencies: Southern Bell Telephone Company Florida Power & Light Indian River Farms Drainage District No objectionable responses have been received. Considering this, the Planning staff could recommend approval providing a permanent easement is retained between Lots 5 and 6 as well as Lots 16 anti 17, Block K for cross drainage purposes. At this time front and rear swales are providing adequate drainage for the lots in question. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 80-37 APPROVING A RELEASE OF EASEMENTS TO ROBERT JAMES SCOTT AS OUTLINED IN THE ABOVE MEMO AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN. 9b APR 91980 BooK 43 PAGE230 APR 91990 soox 43 PAGE231 RESOLUTION NO. 80-37 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, have been requested to release the lot line easements on the south two and one half (2.5) feet of Lot 17; and the north two and one half (2.5) feet of Lot 18, Block K, Oslo Park, according to the Plat of same recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 96, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, said lot line easements were dedicated on the Plat of Oslo Park for public utility purposes; and WHEREAS, the request for such release of easement has been submitted in proper form; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE'BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following lot line easements in Oslo Park, shall be released, abandoned and vacated as follows: The south two and one half (2.5) feet of Lot 17; and the north two and one half (2.5) feet of Lot 18, Block K, Oslo Park, according to the Plat of the same filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, in Plat Book 3, at Page 96. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court be and they hereby are authorized and directed to execute a release of said lot line easements hereinabove referred to in form proper for recording and placing in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. This 9th day of April , 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: r Attest: Freda Wright, Clerk) RELEASE OF EASEMENT This Release of Easement, executed this 9th day of April - , 1980, by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, first party; to Robert James Scott, whose mailing address is 2520 42nd Place, Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida, second party: WITNESSETH: That the said party of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by the said second party, does hereby remise, release, abandon, and quit claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described easement, lying on land situate in the County of Indian River County, State of Florida, to -wit: The south two and one half (2.5) feet of Lot 17; and the north two and one half (2.5) feet of Lot 18, Block K, Oslo Park, a subdigision as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 96, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining and all estate, right, title, interest, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party either in law or equity to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said party for- ever. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: L_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA W. W. Siebe'rt,Jr., Chairman Attest:�1�_ Freda Wright, C1erkU STATE OF FLORIDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL CdN FILE IN THIS OFFICE. _ FREDA WRICHT, CLERK BY D.C. DATE`/D-8O :a 43 PAGE 232 APR 9 198 -43 %E 233 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements personally appeared, W. W. SIEBERT, JR., as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and FREDA WRIGHT, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, to me known to be the persons duly authorized by said County to execute the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same for and on behalf of the said political subdivision. WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 9th day of April 1980. Notary Pu ic, State f Flori at Large. My commi on expires: NOTARY PUSUC 5'' ') JCRIDA AT IARM MY CGMA (Not ar��' Seal WVDED tNRU G":. I ' :5 ;tJ?'RWRITUS c t PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER NEXT DISCUSSED THE ROAD CONSTRUC- TION PROPOSED BY MRS. HELEN HANSON FOR 80TH COURT AND 81ST AVENUE IN THE ROSELAND AREA. HE NOTED THAT REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT WHEN YOU ARE CONSTRUCTING ROADS, CERTAIN PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. MRS. HANSON HAS COMPLIED WITH THIS REQUIREMENT AND NOW NEEDS APPROVAL OF THE PLAN SO THAT SHE MAY MOVE AHEAD WITH CONSTRUC- TION. MR. REVER COMMENTED THAT THE SIZE.OF THE CULVERT NEEDED SHOULD BE INDICATED ON THE PLAN. HE NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED ROADS WILL MEET COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT THAT THEY WILL NOT BE PAVED: THERE ARE NO PAVED ROADS IN THIS AREA. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED THE ATTORNEY IF THE BOARD SHOULD APPROVE THESE PLANS, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE BOARD IS MAKING A DECISION THAT THE ROADS DON T HAVE TO BE PAVED,AND BY ALLOWING MRS, HANSON TO CONSTRUCT THEM IN AN UNIMPROVED CONDITION, HE BELIEVED THE COUNTY WOULD BE ACCEPTING THEM FOR. MAINTENANCE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THESE ARE ROADS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED, BUT HAVE NEVER BEEN CUT IN AND OPENED, AND IT IS THE PEOPLE S RESPONSIBILITY TO OPEN THEM_._.___ - CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT WE HAD TURNED SOMEONE DOWN ON THIS SAME BASIS, BUT ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT WE DID MAKE SOME PEOPLE PAVE ROADS BECAUSE THEY WERE IN A NEW SUBDIVISION WHERE THE ROADS WERE PAVED. THE ROAD LEADING UP TO THOSE PROPOSED BY MRS. HANSON IS A GRADED ROAD. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAD A GOOD DEAL OF DISCUSSION WITH MRS. HANSON AND HAD INFORMED HER THAT SHE HAD TO CONSTRUCT BOTH ROADS AND CONNECT THEM UP: SHE COULD NOT JUST BUILD A PORTION OF THE ROAD TO HER LOT AND STOP. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT HE HAS A RENDERING WITH THE CULVERT SIZE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PLANS SUBMITTED BY MRS. HELEN HANSON FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION FOR 80TH COURT AND 81ST AVENUE IN THE ROSELAND AREA. 91 APS 9190 660K 43 PCE 235 COMMISSIONER WODTKE DISCUSSED THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY SHERIFF JOYCE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE AN AIR CONDITIONING UNIT WITH A HEAT STRIP TO REPLACE THE OLD UNIT IN THE DEPUTY ROOM AND FOR FUNDS TO PAY FOR INSTALLATION OF FIRE HOSES IN THE OLD SECTION OF THE JAIL FOR SAFETY PURPOSES, AS PER PROPOSALS SUBMITTED BY HIM. COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED THAT THESE THINGS SHOULD BE DONE, BUT FELT THAT THE SHERIFF SHOULD HAVE OBTAINED MORE THAN ONE PROPOSAL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE SHERIFFS REQUEST TO PURCHASE AN AIR CONDITIONING UNIT AND FIRE HOSES AS ABOVE AND AUTHORIZED THE PURCHASING DEPARTMENT TO LOCATE THE NEEDED MATERIALS AND OBTAIN THE LOWEST AND BEST PROPOSAL. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ST. .JOHNS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PURCHASED CERTAIN PROPERTY ON APRIL 16, 1979, AND WISHED TO BE EXEMPTED FROM TAXES ON SAID PROPERTY AS OF THAT DATE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 80-38 EXEMPTING ST. JOHNS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FROM TAXES ON CERTAIN LANDS PUR- CHASED BY THEM FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES ON APRIL 16, 1979. 'A 1� RESOLUTION NO. 80- 38 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Florida Statute 196.199, the following described property was purchased by SAINT JOHNS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, on April 16, 1979: The West half of Section 25; all that part of the West half of Section 36 lying North of the Sunshine State Parkway; and that part of Section 26 being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Section 26 run South 89° 57' 12" West along the North line of said Section 26 a distance of 3202.98 feet to a point which is 2137.22 feet East of the Northwest covner of said Section 26; thence run South 020 25' 03" West a distance of 4613.56 feet; thence run North 880 20' 20" East a distance of 3361.25 feet to a point on the East line of said Section 26, said point being 905.72 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner of said Section 26; thence run North 00° 28' 53" East along the East line of said Section 26 a distance of 4519.52 feet to the Northeast corner of said Section 26 and Point of Beginning. All of the above described property lying and being in Township 33 South, Range 36 East, Indian River County, Florida, and containing 978.23 net acres, more or less. said purchase having been made for a valid public purpose. Effective April 16, 1979, and thereafter the lien for taxes on said property are hereby cancelled and discharged, so long as the same are used for public purposes. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLOR.TDA By s..• Willard.W. Siebert, Jr,.: G airman Clgtk X0.9 .. 5`.<r• l` J � -_ 'V'c1opted: April 9, 1980 AD- MOK 43 FAaz36 i PR 91994 _ Boos 43 Pao 237 TH�.BOARD NEXT REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING MEMO WRITTEN TO THE ADMINISTRATOR BY SENIOR PLANNER DAVID MARSH IN REGARD TO OB- TAINING ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE WABASSO REACH PARK PROJECT: INDIAN■ PuNdLAANNr } OERARTIVIENT March 19, 1980 MEMO TO: Jack pG..� Jennings, County Administrator FROM: Dared,arsh, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Engineering Services for Wabasso Beach Pi It has become apparent that the development of the Wabasso Beach Project will take an extensive amount of additional time and resources to imple- ment and complete this construction program. There is currently a pressing need to come up with a viable program schedule delineating contractual/non- contractual services, work assignments and schedules, material estimates and acquisition methods, as well as management procedures. The attached "Program Schedule" gives an idea of the varying tasks which need to be accomplished with suggested coordination and supervision assign- ments. This is a very brief outline of the overall program, and as can be seen, does not really address the extensive amount of detail work that will be required. As a means of developing a viable implementation, construction and manage- ment program, we have discussed with Neil Nelson and Jim Beindorf the possibility of obtaining consulting services to supplement our staff's efforts. Although the overall program could possibly be accomplished "in house", the workload in this_ offi.ce,and apparently with Neil and Wilson also, would sever ely-°limit our effectiveness in expediting the the overall project. I also believe that without a good detailed program schedule that we would also have a --lot of problems in coordination and management. It is for this reason that I would like to request that we extend our con- tractual agreement with Beindorf and Associates to allow for consulting services to be provided in -the same manner as was done for the "Drainage Ordinance" review procedures. The June, 1972 agreement between Beindorf and the County could provide for necessary supplemental services to include the following: SUGGESTED SCOPE - WABASSO BEACH PARK DEVELOPMENT 1) Provide technical and general consultation to the Planning and Administrator's Departments when requested. 2) Perform limited engineering or inspection services on construction and related project matters. DAVID M. REVER • DIRECTOR 212114TH ;ZvE. VERO BEACH, FL 32960 • 305/567-5142 I� J Jack G. Jennings March 19, 1980 Page -2- 3) Provide detailed program schedule, "PERT", CPM, or other methodology, to insure that adequate acquisition, coordination, implementation and management guidelines are defined and scheduling procedures established. 4) Development or procurement of the necessary material lists, specifications, etc., which pertain to the overall project. 5) Consultation with Planning, Purchasing, or other County departments or officials with respect to suggested contractual services to be arranged, bidding procedues and/or negotiations to be undertaken. 6) Coordinate scheduling of additional services as needed with David Rever or Neil Nelson. Payment for additional services shall be in accordance with Section V, Paragraph B of the 1972 Agreement as amended September 21, 1973. I believe that the County Commission allocated $32,500. to serve as matching funds for the development project on September 19, 1979. We are now in the process of setting up the necessary budgetary procedures for disbursements with the Finance Department. Also attached is a proposed letter of agreement to Jim Beindorf. We included this at the suggestion of Neil. Please advise if you need additional informa- tion or material. DM : j t Enclosure MEMO TO: Board of County Commissioners FM: County Administrator I concur with the subject memo and respectfully request psermission to sign enclosed Engineering Service Request Letter. Signed: L 3-24-80 BOOK J PAGE a PROGRAM SCHEDULE EST. cTME FRAME M Co.2 am WABASSO PARK IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE - (6 WEEK PROGRAM) - PREDEVELOPMENT PHASE ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE TASK INITIATE OR ]=A=CCOMPLISH IMPLEMENT NATE/ WORK SUPERVISION Retain coastal setback construction permit Planning --- ---- Complete landscaping working drawings Planning Complete preliminary construction drawings (rest rooms) Planning --- ---- -Grant execution (admin. follow-up, etc.) Planning Setting up accounting and disbursement system Admin. Office Finance Arrange for requisition and deliv`e--ry—`6Tnon-con rac ua materials. see tentative materials list) Arrange for competitive bidding required, preparation and Purchasing --- --- f contracts, etc. Coordinate with power and telephone companies to retain utility-sutility—service (underground). Purchasing Admin. Office Phone & Power Co. Wilson W. Arranoe-for necessaryinsurance firepolice protection Admin. Office --Presentation tQ e and other civic qroups Planning --- --- CONSTRUCTION PHASE Begin fiTl mixing operation - 70% Hobart san 30o County barn marl mixture Admin. Office Road and Bridge S.C.S. rep, and Wilson W . Wilson W. Bring in fill - site preparation on road, parking areas, bluff line, etc. Admin. Office Road and Bridge Admin. Office Construction, road, swales, etc. sun -screen Compaction, bluff line, matting application, plantings Renovation of well, water lines, pump house construction, installation of septic tanks with field beds Wilson W. Vickie R. D�yid M. Wilson W. David M. Wilson W . Wilson W. Planning Bd. of C.C. Admin. Office Vickie R. Contractor(s) Installation of treated poles -cables, railroad ties (palm tree trunks) - land scape borders Admin. Office Road and Bridge Renovation of existing structures wood, roof, paint, hard- ware relocate and repair lifeguard tower Admin. Office Road and Bridge r PROGRAM SCHEDULE ESTIMATED INITIATE OR EST. TIME FRAME COMPLETION DATE TASK IMPLEMENT Construction of new facilities - relief station, boardwalk, H of C.C, walkovers entrysin etc. Admin. Office Bd. of C.C. �— Lar e landscapinq installation Planning Small landscaping installation, placement of signs, tables, -grills. aarbaqe cans and final site work Planning. CAD Maintenance and watering of landscape areas Maintenance of overall park area COORDINATE/• WORK ACCOMPLISH I SUPERVISION Wilson W. WWDavid M. Contractor(s) Vicskie R. lsoq W. Road and Bridge WN'�annin4 r, 1 . ' APR 9.19x0_.- 0& r� - BdOXJ PAGE WABASSO BEACH PARK PROJECT MATERIALS LIST - PRELIMINARY Paving materials (110' of 12 - 14' roadway) type #2 asphalt - soil cement Landscaping (materials list is being prepared) Treated poles and cables - approx. 50 poles (6"-8" x 8') approx. 750' of heavy gauge strand cable 8000 sq. ft. of jute matting and sun screen Approx. 500 lbs. commercial 16-8-8 or 8-8-8 fertilizer Railroad ties (75 - 8' sections) palm tree trunks could be substituted Renovation materials for 4 picnic shelters - paint, replacement wood (roof sheathing and facia) - hurricane clips, nails, felt paper and shingles (approx. 1500 sq. ft.) North picnic area equipment - 4 concrete picnic tables, 3 steel grills, 8 garbage cans with locks and chains to secure 6 rack bike stand Wood chips M M 61 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman WILLIARD W. SIEBERT, JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 March 19, 1980 Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc., and Beindorf and Associates, Inc., A Joint Venture Post Office Box 849 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Attention: Mr. James L. Beindorf Re: Engineering Services to Indian River County Planning Department Dear Mr. Beindorf: As discussed in your meeting with Mr. David Rever, County Planning Director, Tuesday, March 18, 1980, the Indian River County Administrator and Planning Departments require engineering services related to a proposed development project at Wabasso Beach. As Indian River County has an existing agreement dated June 21, 1972, with Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc., and Beindorf and Associates, Inc., A Joint Venture, to furnish engineering services, Indian River County is hereby requesting additional services to be performed in accordance with'the agree- ment. This letter will serve as your authorization to provide additional services to the Planning Department and to proceed on work as discussed by Mr. David Rever and Mr. Neil Nelson. The'scope of work to be accomplished by the additional services shall include but not be limited to the following: SUGGESTED SCOPE - WABASSO BEACH PARK DEVELOPMENT 1) Provide technical and general consultation to the Planning and Administrator's Departments when requested. 2) Perform limited engineering or inspection services on construction and related project matters. A BOOK 43 PAGE 242 a ' aAPR 9 1990 . — BoOK . 43 -PACE -43 Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc., and Beindorf and Associates, Inc., A Joint Venture March 19, 1980 Page -2- 3) Provide detailed program schedule, "PERT", CPM, or other methodology, to insure that adequate acquisition, coordination, implementation and management guidelines are defined and scheduling procedures established. 4) Development or procurement of the necessary material lists, specifications, etc., which pertain to the overall project. 5) Consultation with Planning, Purchasing, or other County departments or officials with respect to suggested contractual services to be arranged, bidding procedures and/or negotiations to be undertaken. 6) Coordinate scheduling of additional services as needed with David Rever or Neil Nelson. Payment for additional services shall be in accordance with Section V, Paragraph B of the 1972 Agreement as amended September 21, 1973. Sincerely, Jack G. Jennings, County Administrator Indian River County, Florida JGJ:jt ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADDI— TIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE WABASSO BEACH PARK PROJECT AS OUT— LINED IN MEMO WRITTEN BY SENIOR PLANNER MARSH DATED MARCH 19, 1980, ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THEY NEED AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO THE MASTER CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH REYNOLDS, SMITH & HILLS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD. HE NOTED THAT THE ATTORNEY HAS REVIEWED THESE DOCUMENTS, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDS THAT THEY BE SIGNED. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT REYNOLDS, SMITH & HILLS HAVE REDUCED THE MULTIPLIER, AND VERY LITTLE ELSE IS CHANGED AS SET OUT IN THE LETTER FROM REYNOLDS, SMITH AND HILLS, AS FOLLOWS: REYNOLDS, SMITH AND HILLS ARC41TF-CTS • ENGINEERS - PLANNERS NCO R -OR Arc [, March 6, 1980 Mr. .lack G. Jennings, County Administrator Indian River County Courthouse 2145. 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Re: Indian River Boulevard from State Road 60 to Barber Avenue Dear Mr. Jennings: ; We are pleased to submit this Contract covering the engineering services necessary to design and prepare construction plans for Indian River Boulevard frim State Road 60 to Barber Avenue in Indian River County, Florida. Supplemental Agreement Number 1 and its Attachment Number 1 are nearly exactly as previously submitted with the major change being the lump sum fee changed to $78,800.00. As are discussed, we have also included additional permits all of which are outlined in the Attachment. We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to submit this foryard to working with Contract and look you on this important project. Yours very truly, REYNOLDS, SMITH ANDr HILLS Jahn W. Deamud, P.E. _ Associate Vice President 1 �6myl 6.0 Howard B. Bochiardy Vice President 43 PAGE244' BooK ion APR 91980 J BOOK ' 43 PAGE 245 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NUMBER 1 AND ITS ATTACHMENT NUMBER 1 TO THE MASTER CONSULTING AGREE- MENT WITH REYNOLDS, SMITH AND HILLS FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN, SAID AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR, COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE .WILL KEEP ON WORKING ON TRYING TO FIND SOMEONE TO RECOMMEND FOR APPOINTMENT TO ST, JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND WILL POSTPONE THIS UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING, ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS RE- CEIVED A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT INCORPORATING THREE CHANGE ORDERS IN REGARD TO INSTALLATION OF DRAINAGE FLAP GATES ON THE BARBER AVENUE PROJECT TO PRECLUDE THE POSSIBILITY OF SALT WATER INTRUSION, AND HE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARD APPROVE SAID CHANGE ORDERS, ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT THESE GATES WOULD BE WELL WORTH THE EXPENDITURE AS REGARDS EMINENT DOMAIN, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS "A", "B", AND "C" ON SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT No. 1 WITH THE DICKERSON GROUP IN REGARD TO THE BARBER AVENUE PROJECT AS RECOMMENDED IN THE ADMINISTRATOR`S MEMO OF MARCH 25, 1980, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN, 102 BOAR COUNTY' COMr'SSiONERS (t a� _ WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.. Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman OkA ��©At&U WILLIAM c. WOOTKE. JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 3295 March 25, 1980 ' INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM! TO: Joe Collins, Attorney FROM: Jack G. Jennings, County Administrator SUBJ: Supplemental Agreement No. 1, Barber Avenue, Indian River County I concur with the Change Orders "A", "B" and "C" set forth in the enclosed agreement and would appreciate your review of the legal documents, etc. attached herein. Would like to get this before the Board of County Commi- ssioners for their approval at their next meeting on `April 9th. r -- Jack G. 4Z nnings, County Administra JGJ/ep Enclosure BOOK . ' 43, Fku-946 M APR 91980 APR 9 wo BOOK Kunde• Driver -Simpson & Associate MO p s, Inc. f rnlmerr. •�r< hitr•(t� I'I•nxu•rtiurr•vnr, Vero ©each, Florida March 17,190 Nir. .hack Jennincs County Administrator Indian 0iver County Vera DF;ach, Florida 32960 ' e: i:uoplemental Agreement No. 1. Cartier Avenue, Indian ,=liver County Je..r r. Oen ,inns: 43' Pig 247 T _nclosed please find four copies of supplemental agreement number 1 tvhic,h has been signed by the contractor and his surity, and is now re3(1rr for the reit+wining signatures. Your assistance is needed for the neces:wry further handling. This agreement pri_;vides for changes to the contract presently in force betwecn Indian River County and t)ickerson ['roup, Inc., contractors on the `b(nve subject project. The contract amount is estlmatcd to increase 9,004.6i? hecause of this change. A breakdown of that amcunt is as follows: Change "All; 68 Lin Ft X 14'1.10 = ;;1434.80 Change 'td"; 1 X Q14,600.00 = 4600.00 Change "C"; 16.5 Cu Yds X i,180.00 = 2970.00 TOTAL ,ihiOUNT - 9,004.80 Also enclosed is a copy of the correspondence which further documents this agreement, ani: is as follows: t1hanue "All- Letter dated November 9,1979 Lhange "El" & °1,'t— Letter dated November 19,1979 with Latter dated January 11,1960; Litter dated :,,inui.ir!i ?J, 13-60; and Letter dated Janur-,ry 1±',1'� -)G with �nrent .. r 1 ,2-A90 r('V.L..;rr.+ thi-. t attire p. ick, rin dnd cc,nt;,rt mFj cnnc(,rnin.- any i,P" r•`V h:iv-�. t 3.i=ar.e retain one execute(i crap i! for my future U --D. Yours very truly, Ali(�:;L-i);tI11Lii-:iTf-ii-.=.iP� � ;," ' i,. ,1f•:C. C/ Iris �:.r,��ln�•+.,res "y: I' F . John U Saxon -'r. cc: F.r. Jt"- 184 ,tr •r•, I lh•t I (hrl l.nu! I'•t l lir,r;ir .u,! �I1.)7'It fit if i 31 I L I,,(ult•ul,rlr• 1 irxrrl., i i; ;4 � s � ,} INDIAN RIVER COUNTY b SUF'f'LEhi- 'GHEEMENT BARBER AVENUE from U.S. 1 to a f<'Iad No. point approximately one mile east. M No. 1. This ,igreement entered into this 22nd day of January , 19 80 , by and tit-tueen INMAN RIVER COUNTY as the party of thf! first part, and Dickerson Group, Inc. , Contractor, and Seaboard Surety Company e :.urety, parties of the second part, the same being supplementary to the contract b .)nd between the parties aforesaid, dated August 24 , 19 79 , for the construction or improvement of tho road assigned the name shown above, in Indian ,fiver County, Flcriula. (1) LJi tnessPth: LHEHLAS, Indian River County desires to hereby amend this contract as follows: (A) Establish the item,ross Drain Fipe Uulv, ,a a unit price of $21.10 per Lin Ft for 68 Lin r—tneaded at Sta35+09. E Establish the item ouble 18"X Medium Duty Flap bates, Lump um, o e furnished and installed on the gteel..Sheet Pile Weir at Sta._82+_0U-- C Increase the item Riprap and Cement oa wny cu.y s at Me con ract unit 2rice for this item -lo be used as ditch gavement at Weir at Sta. 82+00 Rt. The original plan failed to provide a re lacement pipe at this -1-655TIon. Its installation will insure drainage for that area. (fl) The flap gate installation would allow a lower water level In Fe side ditches west of the weir when the water level east of Ehe weir Is at a ower elevation thus erovidinQ a more effective out a . C Tn rnglurg maintenance and increase the effectiveness of the flap gates. t") The parties of the second part hernhy ,3rjree to the above and do the work in accordance with the revised plans, bheet (s) (3) The quantities to be paid for shall be as provided in the standard specifications, Edition of 1977 gnd Suaolement . The quantit.c:, so determined shall be paid for at the unit prices stated hereon or on the attached Sheet-. `iuch prices and payments to constitute full compensation for all mater- ials, equiptment, labor and al,l expenses incident to the changes described here- in, including all delays, all anticipated profit cn reduced quantities, and all extra costs. (4) It is further agreed that this supplemental agreement shall not alter or change in any manner the force and effect of the original contract altered and '4111;211ded by this supplemental agreemHnt. Chunge in G;ntract Amount this agreement: Increase .'----------------------------- „� .O(�' 4 . �Q, Decrease �� No Change .�I TNL"'-S /�n_✓�� ir2c�uf�� wI TNLL�j i r............ BOARD iT CL;UNTY CUMMTSSIUNE16, INOIArY HIUL- Ir CLUruTY, FLURIDA Chai rma n.,, f' r Attfnit AS Clerk of the Indian Rivwr County, Florida Board of County Commissioners %%pprnved as to form: huneral Gounrel for Indian River County �%:,sistar1t L'enUrAl Cnuncel 'I'I(L: DTCKERSON GPOUP INC. 1 sun C o n t r a c t 'xE37-Uive Vice res. ()LBOARD suR� cO.W. Surety DONALD A. ROMNSJIJ MORNEr- Irl • Fr', sooK43 PAGE248 APR 9 190 nn BOOK 43 fACf 24�7 RESOLUTION 80-31 AUTHORIZING FORMAL APPLICATION FOR THE TRACKING STATION PROPERTY IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1980. 106 RESOLUTION NO. 80-31 WHEREAS, for over ten (10) years the Board of County Commissioners for Indian River County, Florida has been attempting to obtain title to the property described below, but generally known as the "Tracking Station Property"; and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has worked with Federal, State and Local Authorities in an attempt to acquire the property; and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has received Notice that the property has now been declared surplus property and is to be disposed of by the General Services Administration; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That all necessary steps are to be taken by the County, its employees and authorized representatives to file the necessary forms, applications and supporting materials to qualify for conveyance of the "Tracking Station Property", described as: PARCEL 1: All that tract or parcel of land lying and being in Government Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, Tallahassee Meridian, Indian River County, Florida, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a concrete monument which is on the South line and 349.14 feet S 89° 45' 25" E of the Southwest corner of said Section 20, and at a corner of a tract of land owned in fee by the United States of America at Vero Beach Tracking Annex; Thence N 00° 13' 15" E along the boundary of said United States tract and subsequently along the boundary of a tract of land conveyed to Indian River County, Florida, by the United States of America by quitclaim deed dated 24 August 1970, a distance of 1350.0 feet to a corner of said tracts and the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence continue N 00° 13' 15" E along the boundary of said United States tract 340 feet, more or less, to a point which is on the mean high water line of the Atlantic Ocean, and at a corner of said United States tract; Thence Southeasterly along the meanders of said high water line which is along the boundary of said United States tract 350 feet, more or less, to a point on a line which bears S 890 45' 25" E from the point of beginning, at a corner of said United States tract and at a corner of said Indian River County tract; Thence N 890 45' 25" W along the boundary of said United States tract which is along the boundary of said Indian River County tract 90 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. NMI Bba 43 PAGE 25- I APR 9 1980 c� BOOK 3 PACE 251 Containing 0.33 of an acre, more or less, and being a portion of Tract "A" of Vero Beach Tracking Annex. PARCEL 2: All that tract or parcel of land lying and being in Govern- ment Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, Tallahassee Meridian, Indian River County, Florida, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a concrete monument which is on the South line and 349.14 feet S 89° 45'25" E of the Southwest corner of said Section 20 and at a corner of a tract of land owned in fee by the United States of America at Vero Beach Tracking Annex; Thence N 00° 13' 15" E along the boundary of said United States tract 1,000.00 feet to a point which is at a corner of said United States tract and at a corner of a tract of land conveyed to Indian River County, Florida, by the United States of America by quitclaim deed dated 24 August 1970,; Thence S 89° 45' 25" E along the boundary of said United States tract which is along the boundary of said Indian River County tract, 208 feet, more or less, to a point which is on the mean high water line of the Atlantic Ocean and at a corner of said tracts; Thence Southeasterly along the meanders of said mean high water line which is along the boundary of said United States tract, 1050 feet, more or less, to a point which is on the South line of said Section 20 and at a corner of said United States tract; Thence N 89° 45' 25" W along the boundary of said United States tract which is along the South line of said Section 20, a distance of 481.14 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Parcel 2 contains 8.04 acres, more or less, and is a part of Tract "A" of Vero Beach Tracking Annex. EXCESS EASEMENT LAND TRACT NO. A -101-E A strip of land 50 feet in width lying 25 feet on each side of the following described center line: Commence at the Southwest corner of the East 10 acres of Government Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, Indian River County, for a point of reference; thence Northerly along the West line of said East 10 acres of Government Lot 1 222 feet, more or less, to the center line of an existing paved road and the Point of Beginning of the center line being described herein; From said Point of Beginning, thence run Westerly along the center line of said existing paved road 210 feet, more or less, to the Easterly right-of-way line of existing State Highway A -1-A and the Point of Termination, containing 0.24 acres more or less. from the appropriate governmental entity; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board expresses its intent to use the "Tracking Station Property" in conjunction with other landholdings owned by the Board contiguous to the "Tracking Station Property" for park -purposes that will benefit all of the citizens and guests of Indian River County. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 19th day of March , 1980. Attest: Freda Wright, Clerk APR 91980 L_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA � � P By Willard W: Siebert, J r.,, Y firman 660K 043 PAcE 2-52 J 860K 43 PAvE 253 - A LETTER WRITTEN BY COMMISSIONER LOY NAMING DELEGATES FOR THE FLORIDA GOVERNORS CONFERENCE ON AGING IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 26, 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR. R. DON DEESON PATRICK B. LYONS JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 April 1, 1980 Ms. Margaret Lynn Duggar Florida Council on Aging P. 0. Box 1046 Tallahassee, Florida 32302 Re: Delegates for -Florida Governor's Conference on Aging Dear Ms. Duggar: Please be advised that the following people have been named as delegates for the Florida Governor's Conference on Aging to be held in Orlando, September 16 - 19, 198-0: jwc Mr. Elmer L. Turner 535 Banyan Road Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: 305-231-1365 Mr. William W. Koolage 815 26th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: 305-567-0663 110 Yours truly, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS L%;� 1(. -G Alma Lee Loy, Vice Chairman I THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND NOS. 65183 - 65546 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 6:30 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: CLERK 111 CHAIRMAN BOOK 43 PAGE 254 I