Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
5/21/1980
MAY 21, 1980 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION.AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1053 20TH PLACE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 21, 1980, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE Loy, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.; AND R. DON DEESON, PATRICK B. LYONS WAS ABSENT BUT DUE TO ARRIVE BEFORE NOON. ALSO PRESENT WERE .JACK G. JENNINGS, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, .JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; .JEFFREY BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER; BAILIFF DAN FLEISCHMAN; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES AND JANICE W. CALDWELL, DEPUTY CLERKS. L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR, WAS ON VACATION. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND PASTOR .JAMES M. GOUDE, WINTER BEACH CHURCH OF GOD, GAVE THE INVOCATION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS WANTED TO ADD ANYTHING TO THE AGENDA. COMMISSIONER LOY REQUESTED ADDING AN ITEM REGARDING A RESOLUTION FOR THE TRACKING STATION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED ADDING AN ITEM CONCERNING THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING THE TWO EMERGENCY ITEMS TO THE AGENDA. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 23, 1980. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT SOME OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAD NOT BEEN ABLE TO FINISH READING THE MINUTES OF APRIL 23, 1980 AND MAY %, 1980. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE,-THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CONTINUE THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF APRIL 23, 1980 AND MAY %, 1980 UNTIL THE FOLLOWING MEETING. Boa 43 FACE 5W MAY 2-1198 0 900K 43, , -ilu504 COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT ON ITEM 2D OF THE CLERK'S AGENDA, THE ACCOUNT TITLE AND NUMBER MENTIONED IN FINANCE OFFICER BARTON'S MEMO DATED MAY 16, 1980 SHOULD BE CHANGED TO READ: TRANSFER FUND, ACCOUNT N0. 471-000-381-00.00, INSTEAD OF FEDERAL FUNDS, ACCOUNT No. 471-000-331-00.00. COMMISSIONER LOY REPORTED THAT SHE HAD TAKEN A TOUR WITH ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON AND WAS AMAZED AT HOW WELL THE EMPLOYEES HAVE ADAPTED TO THEIR NEW FACILITIES SINCE MOVING FROM THE COURTHOUSE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE FOR THE FOLLOWING DEPUTIES APPOINTED BY SHERIFF .JOYCE: DONALD BROWN, JR. WARREN T. ZEUCH, III GLENN D. FRASER DOUGLAS W. MILLER DAVID A. CUDDIE MICHAEL DENNIS SHETLER ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE FUND TO ALLOCATE FUNDS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES PERFORMED ON THE RENOVATION TO THE PEBBLE BAY SEWERAGE SYSTEM, AS FOLLOWS: OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ACCOUNT N0. 004-215-536-33.19 C S $9'.000 DECREASE RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 004-199-513-99.92 $9,000 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND FOR ADDITIONAL STORAGE FILES FOR LITERATURE FOR THE AGRICULTURAL AGENT AND ECONOMIST, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE • ACCOUNT No. INCREASE DECREASE AUTOMOTIVE 102-212-537-66.42 $881 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 102-212-537-66.41 $881 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BUDGET AMENDMENT TO ALLOCATE FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND FOR A NEW TYPEWRITER FOR THE YOUTH GUIDANCE OFFICE, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT N0, INCREASE DECREASE OFFICE EQUIPMENT 102-213-523-66.41 $850 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES 102-199-584-99.91 $850 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED SETTING UP ACCOUNTS FOR EXPENDITURES OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT RECEIVED BY FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION GRANT, AS FOLLOWS: ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO.' INCREASE FEDERAL FUNDS 471-000-381-00.00 $19,256 OTHER MACH. & EQUIP, 471-219-533-66.49 $19,256 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAY ROLLS, CIRCUIT COURT, SPRING TERM, 1980, IN THE AMOUNT OF $150.00; AND COUNTY COURT, APRIL - MAY TERM, 1980, IN THE AMOUNTS OF $150.04 AND $160.16. THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK: TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU - SPECIAL TRUST FUND, MONTH OF APRIL, 1980 TRAFFIC VIOLATION FINES BY NAME - APRIL, 1980 THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE PROPERTY FOR SALE BY THERMO ELECTRIC CO. OF NEW JERSEY, AS INDICATED BY THE FOLLOWING LETTERS: -3- MAY 211980 4.3 WE.�� ry . MAY 2 11980 q)MO-Tetip" deS �.1d305-231-1711 950 CONN WAY SUITE 3 April 23, 1980 Mr. W.W. Seibert Chairman County Commission 2145 14th Ave Vero Beach, Fl. 32960 REALTORS VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 7 � if.Tv •-��` i� 6.: i.•' Re: Property located in Indian River County, Section 36, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, and Section 31, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, 55 Acres Plus or Minus Dear Mr. Seibert: This is to verify a conversation with Mr. Tommy Thompson in regards to the above property. The property is owned by the Employees Profit Sharing & Retirement Program of Thermo Electric Company, Inc. of New Jersey. The Trustees have authorized me to offer this property for sale. The sale would be on an "as is" with no contingencies. I feel the property could be purchased for $175,000,00 cash at the present time. As you know it falls in the Proposed Wetlands Discharge Area in the 201 Facilities Plan. I believe the $175,000.00 is a very reasonable price and better than average value for the county. I an reoyj to have contracts completed at your direction. , Paul''. Koehler Enclosed: Maps cc: Mr. Robert Livingston Mr. Jerome Quinn Mr. Robert MacDonald Board of County Commissioners L.S. "Tommy" Thomas Sub: Purchase of Property on Indian River .S�/8 /,p0 Enclosed with this memorandum, pursuant to this property is another memorandum fromJohn A. Robbins, Engineer on 201 Plan, this letter is self explanatory. In addition to the information included in his memorandum I believe the County Commissioners should have the following information: 1- It as come to my attention that the purchase price is negotiable. 2- An arms -length purchase could very well establish a price for other properties in the area. Any river front access is bound to have considerable value to citizens of the county. Much of this property can be kept in its natural state for such activities as the Audubon Bird Watches; etc. Part of the land can be used for passive type recreation such as scout meetings, picnics; etc. This will insure a large tract of undeveloped natural land within the City limits of Vero Beach. _ This plus the facts outlinour engineer would appear t� a reasonable benefit for ou ci izens provided it can be purcciased at a reasonable price. SVERDRUP & PARCEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (A JOINT VENTURE) Project No. May 6, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: Neil A. Nelson, Assistant County Administrator FROM: John A. Robbins' �" RE: Review of Potent'al Property Sale Relative to the 201 Plan I have reviewed the package of information you transmitted to me by your May 1, 1980, memo, copies included. After review of this information and discussions with staff, I offer the following comments: 1. The subject property is within the impoundment areas contemplated by the 201 Plan. The subject property has been designated as a potential "back- up" site for effluent discharge. 2. We are in the process of determining what, if any, level of funding may be available from E.P.A. to purchase the impoundment -reservoirs. Therefore, should the County purchase this land now, the cost may or may not be re- imbursable out of the project fund. 3. Should the County desire to purchase the land in any event, we recommend verbage be included in the contract which designates the land for potential use as an effluent discharge site. 4. Should the County desire to place an option on the land for future purchase, we recommend including verbage which would allow for renegotiation of selling price based on current appraisal for intended use and also include verbage to designate the site as a potential effluent discharge site. Should you require further information or clarification, I will be available. cc: Mr. Ralph Eng w/encl. Mr. George Collins w/encl. REPLY TO: ( ) 3885 20TH STREET POST OFFICE BOX 849 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 REPLY TO: ( ) 2002 N.W. 13TH STREET SUITE 201 GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 oK 4 fQ` MAY 2 11980 43 f4 OF ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT THAT SINCE IT IS NEGOTIABLE, IT WOULD BE WORTHWHILE FOR THE BOARD TO TRY TO OBTAIN THIS PROPERTY AT A REASONABLE PRICE. HE ADDED THAT SOME OF THE RESIDENTS IN COUNTRY CLUB POINTE HAVE ENDORSED THIS PURCHASE. COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED THAT, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, THE BOARD SHOULD MOVE AHEAD. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY, THAT THE BOARD HAVE AN APPRAISAL MADE, AND THAT THE ATTORNEY AND THE CHAIRMAN NEGOTIATE WITH THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY, AS DESCRIBED IN THE LETTER OF APRIL 23, 1980 FROM VERO BEACH CONDOMINIUM SALES AND RENTALS, INC. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THE ATTORNEY BE AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH THE APPRAISAL. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CALLED -FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING REQUEST FROM THE ROSELAND WOMEN'S CLUB: 612 Barefoot Blvd Sebastian, i•lorida April 25, 1980 Mr. Jack Jennings Indian River County Administrator Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Mr. j ennings, Because you and the other Commissioners were so responsive to the many needs of the Roseland Women's Club during my two years as President (1977- 1979), I have been asked by the members to write to you again. We were so happy to have the inside of the club- house painted, that we bought new white window shades, and three ceiling fans. Now we would like to know if it is possible for the County to paint the outside -of the building. We would all be forever grateful to you. Sincerely, Mrs. Kennet�h� Layr7win MRS. K. L LARK'IN ✓Roseland Women's club 612 Barefoot Bad. c/C Sebastian. FL 32956 -6- ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD RECEIVES A REQUEST FROM THE ROSELAND WOMEN'S CLUB EVERY FEW YEARS; IT COULD BE DONE WITH COUNTY FORCES IF THE BOARD APPROVES THE REQUEST. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THERE IS NO FORMAL CONTRACT WITH THE ROSELAND WOMEN'S CLUB, BUT THERE IS A LETTER ESTABLISHING FEES WRITTEN BY PAUL BURCH ON FEBRUARY 11, 1974. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUEST FROM THE ROSELAND WOMEN'S CLUB AND AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED WITH PAINTING THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING REQUEST FROM THE FELLSMERE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: Date: May 14, 1980 To: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners From: Fellsmere Volunteer Fire Department This is a request to have a transfer of funds.in the amount of $1,600.00 from truck #331 to truck #333. The bid for the new tank and pump on truck #331 exceeded our budget by approximately $5,000.00, and the company that submitted the bid checked out the truck and said that that particular series of truck would be grossly overweight with the tank and equipment we had requested. Therefore, we had a new tank built for that. truck, the same size as the old one, and the truck is back in operation. Truck #333 broke it's transfer case a week ago and the lowest bid we received on that was $1,800.00. All we are requesting is $1,600.00 to cover parts only. The labor we will do ourselves. Respectful ryours R chard T. Weaver, President Fellsmere Volunteer Fire Dept. ,;.. BOARD COUNTY .�f C0��1WSSIO�NERS _ Box 43 SAGEQ MAY 2 19 80 -7 MAY 2 11980 � Book ' 43 o GE 510 DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE REPAIRS NEEDED FOR THE TRUCK)AND THE BOARD EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE CARE OF THE EQUIPMENT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED INSTIGATING AN ACCOUNTING SYSTEM FOR THE EQUIPMENT IN THE BARN; IF SOMETHING MAJOR GOES WRONG WITH A TRUCK, FOR INSTANCE, PERHAPS A REPORT COULD BE MADE CONCERNING THE REPAIRS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA TO MONITOR THE MAINTENANCE AND THE UPKEEP OF THE COUNTY VEHICLES. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ADVISED THAT HE WOULD ASK FOR A DAMAGE REPORT AND A MAINTENANCE MONITORING REPORT IN THE FUTURE FOR COUNTY VEHICLES. COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT COMMISSIONER DEESON GET IN CONTACT WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN FELLSMERE AND FIND OUT WHO WILL BE DOING THE REPAIRS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS AS REQUESTED BY THE FELLSMERE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT. .ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, AND REFERRED TO PARAGRAPHS % AND 8 OF THAT AGREEMENT. HE FELT IN ORDER TO CLEAR UP THE ISSUE, A PHRASE SHOULD BE INSERTED INTO PARAGRAPH % SUCH AS "THE CONCURRENCE DOES NOT JEOPARDIZE THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITIES AND TOWN TO THE COUNTY." CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED WITH THE ATTORNEY THAT THE ADDED WORDING WOULD BE BETTER IN THAT PARAGRAPH. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT ORIGINALLY PARAGRAPHS 7 AND 8 HAD BEEN ONE PARAGRAPH, AND WAS CURIOUS AS TO WHY THEY HAD BEEN BROKEN UP. HE CONTINUED THAT THE WORDING THAT APPLIED TO BOTH PARTIES WAS THAT THE COUNTY HAD NO PROBLEM BUT RESERVED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THEIR AGREEMENT WITH THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES. THE ATTORNEY ALSO NOTED THAT THE COUNTY IS NOT A PARTY TO THE AGREEMENT, JUST CONCURRING TO IT. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT, AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.AND THE ADDITION OF A PHRASE IN PARAGRAPH 7 SUCH AS "THE CONCURRENCE WOULD NOT JEOPARDIZE ANY OBLIGATIONS THAT THE CITY AND THE TOWN HAD WITH THE COUNTY TO SUPPLY SERVICES TO THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS. It -9- M 9_ MAY 211980° gCC ii4. J�vL�C MAY 2 119 90 Boos.. MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this 6th day of May 1980, by and between the TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (hereinafter called "Town"), and the CITY OF VERO BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (hereinafter called "City"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City of Vero Beach desires additional fire protection service in the event of a structural fire within its municipal boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Town of Indian. River Shores may require additional fire protection service in the event of a structural fire within its municipal boundaries; and WHEREAS, both parties are willing and able to assist the other in. the event of a structural fire by providing immediate fire fighting assistance; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties in consideration of the mutual promises set forth below that: 1. In the event of a fire or other emergency within the now existing municipal boundary of the Town determined to require outside assistance, it is the intention of the City to immediately respond, upon request, with a minimum of one (1) Class A Pumper and a crew therefor. 2. In the event of a fire or other emergency within the now existing municipal boundary of the City determined to require outside assistance, it is the intention of the Town to immediately respond, upon request, with a minimum of one (1) Class A Pumper and/or an aerial ladder truck and a crew therefor. 3. Additional men or equipment may be provided by the assisting Fire Department only pursuant to the express approval of the ranking officer of the assisting department at the scene OF THE FIRE. 4. The ranking officer of the requesting department shall have sole responsibility and authority to direct and control all r firefighting activities at the scene of the structural Lire; accordingly, the firefighters from the assisting department shall be subject to the orders and direction of said ranking officer. ' 5. This agreement is subordinate to each party's primary responsibility of providing fire protection or other services to their respective municipalities and service territories. Accordingly, this agreement is subject to prior fire calls, medical emergency calls, or other calls involving persons or property located within the municipal boundaries and service territories of the respective parties; similarly, either party may withdraw from the scene of the structural fire in order to respond to a fire or other emergency call occurring within its municipal boundaries or elsewhere. Neither party shall be liable for any loss which may result from the failure to re- spond promptly, or at all, or for leaving the scene of the structural fire. 6. Neither party will be liable for any alleged loss or damage to persons or property caused by or resulting from or arising out of alleged nonfeasance, malfeasance, or otherwir&e elx�_ cause whatsoever under this agreement. 7. This agreement is entered into with the concurrence of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners., with the understanding that the Tawe and City dill continue to provide fire coverage to the unincorporated areas as has been rovided in the Pas 8. In addition, it is expressly understood that the Town and the County reserve their respective rights and responsi- bilities contained in any and all fire protection agreements entered into between them prior to the execution of this agree- ment. 9. This agreement shall be renewed automatically for one (1) year periods, starting from the date of the execution of this agreement, unless either party notifies the other in writing of its intention to terminate same no later than sixty (60) days from said annual date. MAY 2 11980 MAY 211980 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto affixed their hands and seals at Vero Beach, Florida, on the first day and date above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: As to Toon i��' 2t;r� As `go City Yb to County THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES By c`J ayor ATTEST. Town "C er CITY OF VERO BEACH By G Mayor ATTEST CiCleft INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS IO ERS By Chairman ATTEST: County �er�-4 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT READ AND THEN PRESENTED RESOLUTION No. 80-43 TO THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LIFE SAVING EFFORT OF PATRICIA ZEH. SOME OF THOSE BEING HONORED WERE NOT ABLE TO BE PRESENT, BUT EACH PERSON WHO TOOK PART IN THIS EFFORT WILL RECEIVE A COPY OF THE RESOLUTION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THE BOARD WAS EXTREMELY PLEASED WITH THE VOLUNTEER SERVICES IN THE COUNTY AND FELT WHAT OCCURRED ON MAY 3RD BROUGHT OUT THE VERY BEST OF PEOPLE IN THE COUNTY. ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN PRAISED NEWSMAN PHIL LONG FOR GATHERING ALL THE INFORMATION NEEDED IN ORDER TO PREPARE THE RESOLUTION. -13- r . MAY 211980 ° 43 PAGE 51.5 ®ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, on May 3, 1980, PATRICIA ZEH, ten years old, of ndian River County was badly burned due to gasoline igniting and ushed by automobile to the Indian,River Memorial Hospital; and WHEREAS, there were many people involved in the life-saving drama that followed, some far and above the call of duty, in dramatic sequence as follows: ' MARIE REYNOLDS and DOREEN JANNETTY were the nurses in the gmergency Room when the little girl was brought in and they acted in a prompt and diligent manner; The Indian River County Volunteer Ambulance Squad was having their annual banquet when the emergency call came in, and ALEX SHIT who is not only a member of the Ambulance Squad but a member of the Shrine Crippled Children's Committee, together with BUD INMAN 'left the banquet and responded in the usual prompt and efficient manner of the Volunteer Ambulance Squad. When it was decided to to little PATRICIA ZEH to the Tampa Burn Center for treatment, BUD IIN.MAN volunteered to drive the ambulance accompanied by PAT ORRICK, a nurse in the Intensive Care Unit of the local Hospital, and ALEX SMITH; On May 5th it was determined that little PATRICIA ZEH should be flown to Boston for more sophisticated treatment and WILLIAM PATTERSON donated his airplane for the trip. ART SCHULZ piloted the plane again accompanied by ALEX SMITH; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM- MISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board takes this opportunity to honor some of the many people who have contributed time and effort and donated equipment to help little PATRICIA ZEH in a manner that is another example of the wonderful volunteerism that we have in Indian River County; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board expresses its thanks to all of the people involved in the life-saving mission, and in particular, MARIE REYNOLDS and DOREEN JANNETTY, nurses at the local Hospital; ALEX SMITH and BUD INMAN who drove the little girl to Tampa; PAT ORRICK, a nurse in the Intensive Care Unit of the Indian River Memorial Hospital; WILLIAM PATTERSON who donated his plane for the flight to Boston; and ART SCHULZ who piloted the plane accompanied by ALEX SMITH. Said Resolution shall become effective as of May 7, 1980. �tyL� H M Chairman, County Commissioners THE HOUR OF 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Belr;re he unr'crsigned authority personally appeared J. J, SChumirn, Jr. who on oath says that he is Eusiness Manager of the Vero beam Press -Journal a newspnr;er pubh;hed at Vero Beach in Inman River C•)unty, rlxiaa; that the attache:: -py of aoserh;•.ment. t.eing a • in the matter of ,-/ 7' 7 in the lished in said newspaper in the issues of 19�D Court, was pub- Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newscaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been ccntinuous!y published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly ani has been entered as second c!ass mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy 'of adver- tiserrent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before We this - . I I - day of A. D. (SEAL) (Business Manager) (Clerk of the Circuit Ccur't�ndian River County,; Florida) NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian River County, Florida, has tentatively ap. proved the following changes and additions to the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida, which changes and additions are substantially as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property known as Government Lot 7, Section 26, Township 31, Range 39, in Indian River County, Florida, to - wit: Government Lot 7, Section 26, Township 31 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida, less State Highway A -1-A ROW Be changed from R-1 Single Family District to R-2 Multiple Family District. A public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an I opportunity to be heard, will be held by said Planning and Zoning Commission in the County Commission Room, Indian River County Courthouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Thursday, March 13, 1980, at 7:30 P.M., after which said public hearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard will be held by; the Board of County Commissioners of Indian; River County, Florida, in the County CGm•1 mission Room, Indian River County Cour- thouse, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wedn6sday, April 23,1980, at 2:00 P.M. Board of County Commissioners Indian River County By: Willard W. Siebertrlr. Chairman Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission By: Dick Bird, Chairman Feb. 21, 22, 1980. NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO JONNIE DAHLSTROM BY THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT IN COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTE 125,66, AND COPY OF SAID NOTICE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD THAT THIS HEARING WAS ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 23, 1980, BUT WAS RE- SCHEDULED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT REVIEW BEFORE GIVING A —15— Boos 43 ,Pace. k. RECOMMENDATION. 8Ot r( 43 PAGE 515.. HE ADVISED THERE WAS A SLIGHT DIFFICULTY GETTING THIS PROPOSAL BEFORE THE BOARD BECAUSE OF SOME MISHAP IN THE NOTIFICATION PROCESS, WHICH HAS BEEN RESOLVED. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE LEGAL AD WAS IN ORDER AND THE STATUTORY NOTICE, AS REQUIRED UNDER CHAPTER 125, WAS SUBSEQUENTLY RENOTICED FOR TODAY; THE NOTICES ARE NOW PROPER, PLANNER REVER COMMENTED THAT THE REQUEST FOR THE EXTENSION WAS BENEFICIAL BECAUSE SOME QUESTIONS WERE RESOLVED, AND THEY HAVE NOW COME TO A REASONABLE MODIFICATION IN THE REQUEST. MR. REVER STATED THE REQUEST ORIGINALLY WAS FROM R-1 TO R-2 ZONING, AND THE APPROVED, UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION BY THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD IS FOR R -2B ZONING. HE THEN PROJECTED A MAP ON THE WALL OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND HE READ THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE STAFF REPORT: ZONING CHANGE - STAFF REPORT Jonnie Dahlstrom Gamer Robert Cairns Agent 1010 Executive Center Drive Address Orlando, Fla. 32803 1-7-80 Date of Application IRC-80-ZC-1 Application Number Rezoning from R-1 to R-2 (District District Preliminary Final X Hearing PROPOSED USE AND LOCATION: Subject property is divided by A -1-A; the east portion, 9.64 acres and west, 26: acres, lies south of Wabasso Beach Road approximately 1/5 mile. Applicant proposes to build a recreational multi -family condominium community. EXISTING SITUATION: This parcel is presently zoned R-1, and is currently vacant. The surroun ing area immediately north is zoned Commercial,and remaining area around the subject property is zoned R-2, Multiple Family District. Presently the surrounding area is vacant. RECOMMENDATION: This rezoning has an impact greater than its described boundaries. The thirty-five (35) plus acres under consideration is a part of approximately 365 acres proposed for a unified development. There are also the environmental factors of the beach and its special qualities attractive to development. Many factors must be considered here with respect to total development, while focusing attention on the parcel being presented for rezoning. Some are: Physical location of various housing types Need for different housing types Economics of location and density Need for setbacks and exclusions, to protect the natural resources Need for flexibility in design, while maintaining meaningful land use control, in order to accomplish the best development Provision of proper and adequate facilities and services The staff recognizes these and other areas of concern, and the potential for positions of opposing viewpoints in the preceding list. It is the staff's belief that these aims can be effectively handled at some point during the management process of zoning, site plan and/or subdivision review. The staff has taken the aforementioned factors into consideration for the parcel presented here for rezoning and the other surrounding property, including that which is part of the 365 acres being held for a unified development. The following is a synopsis of those considerations: 1) That there is a need to be flexible in management of the land use. Spot zoning should not be used to delineate or gain the best possible density designations. The present zoning requirements are sometimes too rigid to gain equity between economic use and protection in areas such as this. 2) In cases such as this, it is the intensity of use in specific areas rather than the overall density which is really important. Therefore, variations in density by zoning is not the best approach but better use of management controls (e.g. site plan, subdivision, etc.) may be most effective.. 3) The present parcel is zoned R-1 and is encompassed by properties zoned R-2 and C-1. 4) The beach and shoreline should be protected as best as possible both on the ocean and river. 5) The R -2B designation does allow for some flexibility in design intensity, and therefore from a management perspective is a better tool for develop- ment in such areas as this. 6) This type of request could be more appropriately handled under the proposed Future Land Use Plan. However, should more flexible guidelines not materialize, the staff would in the future recommend that rezoning be initiated in the overall area to reflect the general density allowances of the existing R -2B zone. Thus the staff would not recommend the rezoning from R-1 to R-2, but would support a change to R -2B. ���� aU Vid M. Rever Planning and Zoning Director DMR: j t cc: Cairns PLANNER REVER ADDED THAT DR. HERBERT KALE WAS CONCERNED WITH PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND CONCURRED WITH THEM THAT THIS WAS THE MOST REASONABLE MANNER IN WHICH TO HANDLE THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST. ROBERT CAIRNS, AGENT FOR JONNIE DAHLSTROM, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND SHOWED A SCHEMATIC DRAWING OF THEIR PARTICULAR PARCEL. HE CONTINUED THAT THEIR INTENTION WAS TO CREATE A BEACH CLUB IN THE AREA, —17— �. a Y 2 119 80 Boca 43 PAGE1. I MAY 2 11980 mat, 43 PAC AND THEY ARE PLANNING A TENNIS COMMUNITY. MR. CAIRNS ADDED THAT ORIGINALLY THEY REQUESTED R-2 ZONING BUT IT TURNED OUT THAT THE R -2B WAS A DESIGNATION THAT WOULD ACCOMPLISH JUST WHAT THEY HAD PLANNED; THEREFORE, THEIR REQUEST IS FOR R-213 ZONING. COMMISSIONER Loy INQUIRED ABOUT THE OCEANFRONTAGE. MR. CAIRNS ADVISED THERE WAS 380' ON THE OCEAN AND 516' ON THE CONSTRUCTION SETBACK LINE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED ABOUT WATER AND SEWER IN THE AREA. MR. CAIRNS COMMENTED THAT THEY PLANNED TO DO ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER; THE WATER PLANT WOULD BE REVERSE OSMOSIS, WITH A STANDARD SEWER PLANT. PLANNER REVER REPORTED THAT THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PROBLEM OF PUTTING IN A MAJOR PLANT: THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO NEGOTIATE SUPPLYING WATER TO THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS IF THEY WERE AFFECTING THE WATER TABLE, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REFERRED TO THE THREE ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER MENTIONED IN THE PLANNING & ZONING MINUTES WHICH WERE: A 15" LINE FROM THE MAINLAND TO AlA, A 12" LINE SOUTH TO JOHN'S ISLAND, AND ON-SITE WATER. COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPORTED THERE IS NO FRANCHISE FOR ANY ONE TO SERVICE WATER - NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO SELL WATER IN THAT AREA. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY ONE PRESENT WHO WISHED TO SPEAK. J. G. ROSE, 271 SEA OAK DRIVE, INDIAN RIVER SHORES, APPROACHED THE BOARD STATING HE WAS A REPRESENTATIVE OF LOST TREE VILLAGE, OWNERS OF JOHN'S ISLAND. HE ASKED PLANNER REVER WHAT THE PROPOSED DENSITY WAS AND HOW MANY ACRES IT CONTAINED. PLANNER REVER RESPONDED THE PROPOSED DENSITY WAS 8 UNITS PER ACRE, AND THERE WERE 35 ACRES. HE ADDED THAT IT WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. � � r COMMISSIONER Loy CONCURRED WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S RECOMMENDATION, AS IT WAS GOOD. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 80-23 GRANTING THE REZONING TO R -2B AS REQUESTED BY .JONNIE DAHLSTROM, AND AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING STAFF, AS OUTLINED IN THEIR STAFF REPORT. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED HE WOULD VOTE AGAINST THE MOTION AS THIS WOULD CREATE FURTHER IMPACT ON THE BEACH AREA, AND HE DID NOT KNOW HOW THOSE SERVICES WOULD BE PROVIDED. HE ADDED THAT`H9 ISS NOT OPPOSED TO THE R -2B ZONING BUT FELT IT WAS PREMATURE AND UNTIL THE COUNTY IS ABLE TO PROVIDE SERVICES FOR FURTHER IMPACT ON THE BEACH, HE DID NOT THINK THE BOARD SHOULD IMPACT IT FURTHER. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED, WITH CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTING IN OPPOSITION. MAY 2 11980 x rw m s BOQK 43PAGE BOOK, . 43 PAGE522. ORDINANCE NO. 80-23 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, did publish and send its Ndtice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto held a public hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning'Ordiance of Indian River County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended as follows: 1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: Government Lot 7, Section 26, Township 31 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida, less State Highway A -1-A ROW Be -changed from R-1 Single Family District to R -2s Multiple Family District. All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said Zoning Regulations. This Ordinance shall take effect May 27, 1980. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED RALPH SEXTON TO APPROACH THE BOARD AND THEN READ RESOLUTION 80-44 HONORING HIM FOR HIS YEARS OF DEVOTED SERVICE TO THE COUNTY. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE RATE INCREASE FOR FLORIDA CABLEVISION. ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE BOARD HAD THE RIGHT TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENT AND ACCEPT TESTIMONY IF IT SO DESIRED; THE PUBLIC WAS NOTIFIED THAT -THE HEARING WAS CONTINUED UNTIL TODAY. BILLY B. CROSBY, GENERAL MANAGER OF FLORIDA CABLEVISION, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND COMMENTED ABOUT THE PROBLEMS THEY WERE HAVING WITH CHANNEL 2. HE CONTINUED THAT ABOUT 10 YEARS AGO WHEN CHANNEL 2 WAS PLACED ON CABLEVISION, THE SIGNAL WAS NOT VERY STRONG�BUT OVER THE YEARS THEY HAVE IMPROVED IT GREATLY. MR. CROSBY NOTED THAT THEY HAVE CO—CHANNEL PROBLEMS AND CHANNEL 2, WHICH COMES FROM DAYTONA, IS THE WORST CHANNEL OF ALL. HE ADVISED THAT MR. DOOLEY OF CHANNEL 2 HAS RECEIVED AN FCC GRANT TO BUILD A MICROWAVE TO HELP IMPROVE THE CHANNEL, AND HOPEFULLY IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS, THEY SHOULD GET A GOOD SOLID CHANNEL, MR. CROSBY ADVISED THAT A WEEK AGO, MARTIN COUNTY RECEIVED A RATE INCREASE TO $7.75, AND OKEECHOBEE WAS GRANTED A RATE OF $8.95 A MONTH. HE FELT THAT FLORIDA CABLEVISION WAS DOING AN OUTSTANDING JOB AND WERE ONLY ASKING FOR $7.25 A MONTH. COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT ALL THE LETTERS THAT HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY THE BOARD FROM UNSATISFIED CUSTOMERS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO FLORIDA CABLEVISION IN ORDER TO HELP THEM UPGRADE THEIR SYSTEMS AND TO HAVE BETTER PUBLIC RELATIONS. HE FELT THE RATE STRUCTURE WAS NECESSARY TO UPGRADE THEIR SYSTEM. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT AT TIMES THEY DO RECEIVE A BAD SIGNAL BUT THOUGHT CABLEVISION DOES CARRY CERTAIN GOOD STATIONS. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS— SIONER DEESON THAT THE BOARD ADOPT RESOLUTION 80-49 WHICH WOULD AMEND THE FLORIDA CABLEVISION RESOLUTION, AUTHORIZING A RATE INCREASE TO $7.25 PER MONTH, EFFECTIVE .JUNE 1, 1980. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT LIKE TO SEE CHANNEL 2 OFF THE AIR AND HE. FELT WHAT WE GET ON CHANNEL 2 WAS WORTH ,IT,. —21— BOOK_, 43.EA �c.h MAY 2 x.1980 MAY 2x.1984 m DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS LEARNED THAT THE CITY MIGHT HAVE AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JULY 1ST WITH FLORIDA CABLEVISION, DEPENDING ON THE OUTCOME OF THEIR PUBLIC HEARING.. IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THE FLORIDA CABLEVISION RATE INCREASE FOR THE COUNTY REMAIN AT JUNE 1, 1980. RESOLUTION 80-49 WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN RECEIVED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THANKED THE CITY, ON BEHALF OF ALL THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, FOR MAKING THEIR FACILITIES AVAILABLE TO THEM. PETE MUSICK, SURVEYOR, MADE A PRESENTATION IN REGARD TO A REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, REQUESTED BY DEVELOPER, JACK REDISH. HE DISPLAYED A PLAT TO THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THE OWNERS AGREED TO BRING UP THE ELEVATION OF THE WESTERN PORTION.TO 20'. MR. MUSICK SPOKE ABOUT PUTTING AN ADDITIONAL NOTE ON THE PLAT CONCERNING THE AMOUNT OF FILL THAT MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. HE ADDED THAT THEY HAVE NO CONTROL OVER WHAT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT WOULD REQUIRE FOR FILL. MR. MUSICK ADVISED THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE AND THE COMMUNITY BUILDING ARE CONSTRUCTED ON LAND SIMILAR TO THE TYPE ON WHICH THEY PLAN TO BUILD THEIR HOMES, ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REPORTED THERE ARE PRIVATE ROADS IN THE SUBDIVISION AND THE EASEMENTS WILL NOT BE MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY - EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER AT THIS TIME. ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED THE PRIVATE ROADS, AND THAT THE SUB- DIVISION TO THE NORTH HAD DEDICATED ROADS TO THE PUBLIC. HE WONDERED WHY HAVE PRIVATE ROADS WHEN IT WOULD APPEAR LOGICAL FOR DEDICATED ROADS TO GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH. MR.-MUSICK COMMENTED THAT THE PLAN AS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED WAS TO HAVE PUBLIC ROADS; THERE IS A PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE NORTH 35', THAT THE COUNTY COULD TAKE INTO ITS ROAD SYSTEM IF NECESSARY. HE DID NOT SEE ANY PROBLEM NOW OR IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE THE DEDICATIONS CLEARLY STATE IT WILL NOT BE MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY UNTIL THE COUNTY REQUESTED THEM. ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS STATED IT WAS HIS REQUEST THAT THE ROADS BE MADE PRIVATE - HE WANTED TO BE SURE THAT THE ROADS WERE CONSTRUCTED TO COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS. MR. MUSICK NOTED THAT THE COUNTY ORDINANCE CALLS FOR AN INTENT FOR PUBLIC ROADS TYPE OF DEDICATION; THE REST OF THE ROADS AND EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE UTILITIES AND CABLEVISION, AS WELL AS FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES. HE CONTINUED THAT THE OWNER IS DEDICATING ROADS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS TO THE PRESENT AND FUTURE PROPERTY OWNERS, AND HE FELT WITH THAT SORT OF WORDING, IT WOULD BE UP TO THE COUNTY TO EXERCISE THEIR OPTION WHEN IT WANTS TO TAKE THE ROADS OVER; THE ROADS WOULD NOT BE MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY UNTIL THAT TIME. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS FELT TENTATIVE APPROVAL COULD BE GIVEN TO THE PLAT. THE BOARD THEN REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM VICKIE RENNA OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT: INOIAN RIVER COUNTY OERARTMEIN May 15, 1980 MEMO TO: Jack Jennings, County Administrator FROM: Vickie Renna, 1 anner SUBJECT: West Meadows Subdivision _ West Meadows'Subdivision has made all the major changes from the Technical Review Committee meeting.on their tentative.plat. However, some minor changes have to be made in which I am'working with the developer to resolve. The changes are not major enough to be kept off the agenda. These deficiencies are as follows: 1) General note on the plan needs to be changed to "Private road and easements not to be taken by the County until an elected time in the future" or something similar. 2) Must call Health Department about their comments in the Technical Review Committee minutes. These comments have already been underlined in the minutes. VR: jt MAY 2 11 8 —23— sox Fact. Sze y MAY 211980 �OtfII:. kCE'° MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, FOR TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF WEST MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED HE WAS NOT RAISING A LEGAL OBJECTION BUT HE WOULD LIKE TO CONSULT WITH MR. MUSICK REGARDING THE INPUT FOR THE DEDICATION. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED:ABOUT THE "GENERAL NOTES" ON THE PLAT AND THE ATTORNEY ADVISED THEY ARE THERE JUST FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE COUNTY AND THE DEVELOPER, AND WOULD NOT HAVE ANY BEARING WHATSOEVER ON A THIRD PARTY PURCHASER. ADMINISTRATOR .JENNI-NGS BELIEVED THEY WERE THERE FOR GUIDANCE, AND WHAT IS ON THE FINAL PLAT IS BINDING. ATTORNEY COLLINS REITERATED THAT THE FINAL PLAT IS BINDING ON THE DEVELOPER AND BUYER,AND THE BOARD MUST BE SURE THAT EVERYTHING THE COUNTY IS REQUIRING IS MENTIONED ON THAT DOCUMENT. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. COMMISSIONER LYONS ARRIVED AT THE MEETING AT 10:45 O'CLOCK A.M. THE HOUR OF 10:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach. indian :giver County, Fioridr, COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority persona(,, appearc., _ - Schurcns„n, Jr. who t'.r. oath says that he is Business Manager of tha Vero Bcarn Fres- .;;rr. %vc,,4,1v ne:,,spaper at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; iisn the atiach;.c -o:1, of ad ,;rtisement, being i a in the matter of in the Court, was pub - .. fished in said newspaper in the issue; of _ �� Ai:lani tori r:: t t i;it L E t'r - .,,,'r,,•. nry • ,'er puff! nr_tj Vero be,lrh, n sdl ln,d,:� Krecr C�:,•"ry, ar,rr tl,,, tht- , ,_.- neusps <•. ha< h•_ 7 ot p�' _�cr'n c -W inuc, pu'u' hc• it 'rr:Vra_:.! been nd C!,5s m.a rratier a+'r'.c t . a r2r;-; - rC• ',Car nux(r ,_ i r[T_ ti the ir..r.,C n it •, proms &-r:%: C...- - ,.•�•; :L.. -.•U'-. fr.. ,, -: Tnr:�. .. , `.i -c. -.. SrCLr�r,f. ` i ..-;� s: rl -r paL ..rat; . n..r .<i;J n •v:nr - ;c., '$-. ,L NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thatthe Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, will hold a public hearing on May 21, 1980, at 10:30 A.M. in the City Council Chambers in the Vero Beach City Hall to consider the adoption of an Ordinance amending Indian River County Ordinance No. 73-43, Article IX, Section 21.85, creating a Fire Protection Taxing Unit defining the boundaries of said Taxing Unit to include the unincorporated portions of Indian River County authorizing the levy by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, of a tax not to exceed three (3) mills on all the .real and tangible taxable property within said Taxing Unit providing for interlocal agreements with municipalities by providing for a new Article IX, Section 21-85, Fire Protection Taxing Unit redefining the boundaries of said Taxing Unit to exclude the newly created North Indian River County Fire District and to exclude the proposed West Indian River County Fire District. Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida By: -s -Willard W. Siebert Jr. Apr. 30,1980--_ — -- - - --- 911 r I ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS AN AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT HAVING TO DO WITH FIRE PROTECTION, AND THE COUNTY PREVIOUSLY, BACK IN 1978, ENACTED AN ORDINANCE SETTING OUT THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE UNIT FOR THE ENTIRE UNINCORPORATED PORTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. HE CONTINUED THAT WITH THE ENACTMENT OF THE NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT, THERE WAS A NEED TO DELETE THAT DISTRICT FROM THE BOUNDARIES SO THAT THERE WOULD NOT BE AN OVER -LAPPING OF ASSESSMENTS BETWEEN THE TWO. THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT, IN EFFECT, THE AMENDMENT REDUCES THE SIZE OF THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE UNIT TO EXCLUDE THE NORTH COUNTY TAXING DISTRICT AND ANY AREAS WEST OF I-95. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANY ONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LOY TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 80-24 AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE 78-43, CREATING A FIRE PROTECTION TAXING UNIT, EXCLUDING THE NORTH COUNTY TAXING DISTRICT AND AREAS WEST OF I-95, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1980. ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THAT THE NEXT FUNDING PERIOD WOULD BEGIN OCTOBER 1ST, THEREFORE, SEPTEMBER 30TH SHOULD BE THE EFFECTIVE DATE. PETE NOEL, NEWSMAN, ASKED WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO THE NORTH BEACH WHEN THE SOUTH DISTRICT IS PUT TOGETHER. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ADVISED THAT IT WOULD BE AN EQUAL PART OF THE DISTRICT. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT IT MIGHT BE FUNDED BY INDIAN RIVER SHORES; IT IS TO BE NEGOTIATED. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. -25- 7 MAY 2 11980, J -I MAY 211980 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 80-24 aooK .43 PAGE 528 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 78-43, ARTICLE X, SECTION 21-85, CREATING A FIRE` PROTECTION TAXING UNIT DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID TAXING UNIT TO INCLUDE THE UNINCORPORATED PORTIONS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF A TAX NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) MILLS ON ALL THE REAL AND TANGIBLE TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN SAID TAXING UNIT PROVIDING FOR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS WITH MUNICIPALITIES BY PROVIDING FOR A NEW ARTICLE X. SECTION 21-85, FIRE PROTECTION TAXING UNIT REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID TAXING UNIT TO EXCLUDE THE NEWLY CREATED NORTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT AND TO EXCLUDE THE PROPOSED WEST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that Indian River County Ordinance No. 78-43, Article X, Section 21-85, which previously read: Article X, Section 21-85 Fire Protection Taxing Unit "There is hereby created an Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit under the authority of -..Section 125.01, Florida Statutes. The boundaries of Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit shall be coterminious with all the unincorporated areas existing on Januar 1, 1978 and on the first day of January of each year thereafter within the boundaries of Indian River County, Florida." Indian River County Ordinance No. 78-43, Article X, Section 21-85, is hereby amended to read as follows: Article X, Section 21-85 Fire Protection Taxing Unit "There is hereby created an Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit under the authority of Section 125.01, Florida Statutes. The boundaries of Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit shall be coterminious with all the unincorporated areas existing on January 1, 1978 and on the first day of January of each year thereafter within the boundaries of Indian River County, Florida, excepting all of Township 30 South, and that part of Township 31 South lying east of lateral "U" and west of the'west bank of the Indian River and excepting all of that portion of Township 31 lying west of lateral "U" and Townships 32 and 33 lying west of Interstate Highway I-95. This -Ordinance shall take effect September 30, 1980. THE HOUR OF 10:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT: VER® 13EACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beam, Indian Giver County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersik,ned authority personally appeared J. J S hum,)W) Jr. who ;n -Jath says that he is Business Man: cer of the Vero Beach Press-lournai, a wec".l, news^aper ;x:blished at Vero Beach in Indian River Countv, F ioriaa; that the atUach;: l ,. ,pv -t au.crt+sern,en'. bems a in the matter of in the lished in said newspaper in the issues of Court, vias pub- Affiant further ssys that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper publi:.hed at Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun'y, and that the said newspaper has heretofore. been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida weekly and has bean inter ed as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian R.ivt�r rw Fiorr!a for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached o_-py rr adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid ncr promised any person, .irrn or corporation any discount, rebate, cornmissicn or refund for the purp,ise of securin - tn', ad'va- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed beforone 11th�day of v2 ^ r1.�, i1cl Business iVanag'r-r1 (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Tuan River County, Florida) NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of .Indian River I County, Florida, will hold a public hearing on May 21, 1980, at 10:30 A.M. in the City Council Chambers in. the Vero Beach City Hall to consider the adoption of an Ordinance creating the West Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit, defining the boundaries of said Taxing Unit authorizing the levy by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, of a tax not to exceed three (3) mills on all the real and tangible taxable property within said taxing unit, providing for the budget and assessment, levying and .collection of such taxes within said taxing unit, providing for interlocal agreements with municipalities, providing an effective date. Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida By: -s -Willard W. Siebert Jr. Apr. 30,1980. ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THAT THE FORM OF THIS ORDINANCE, TO CREATE THE WEST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT, IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PREVIOUSLY ENACTED ONE. HE CONTINUED THAT THE DESCRIPTION OF THAT AREA IS WEST OF I-95 AND ALSO INCLUDES THAT PORTION WEST OF THE NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT, AND EXCLUDES THE URBAN AREA OF FELLSMERE, OR LATERAL U. THE ATTORNEY ADDED THAT IN HIS OPINION, THIS ORDINANCE SHOULD BE EFFECTIVE . IMMEDIATELY. THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANY ONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE. —27— MAY 211980 a �� . 43 tacE 529 MAY 211980 TBOOK 41, PAGE 5110 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC�.HEARI'NG.° ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 80-25 CREATING THE WEST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY. AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE WEST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT, DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID TAXING UNIT AUTHORIZING THE LEVY BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA OF A TAX NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) MILLS ON ALL THE REAL AND TANGIBLE TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN SAID TAXING UNIT, PROVIDING FOR THE BUDGET AND ASSESS- MENT, LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF SUCH TAXES WITHIN SAID TAXING UNIT, PROVIDING FOR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS WITH MUNICIPALITIES, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NHEREAS, Florida Statutes, Section 125.01, (1) , (q) establishes the power of a non -chartered county to levy ad valorem taxes within the constitutional limits fixed for municipal purposes within a municipal service taxing unit established on properties lying within the unincorporated areas of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, Section 125.01, (1), (q), Florida Statutes grants the Board of County Commissioners of a non -charter county, the power to establish a municipal taxing unit for any part or all of the unincorporated areas of the, County within which may be provided fire protection from funds derived from taxes within such unit only; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. A new Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida, to be designated as Chapter 21, Article XII, is hereby adopted to read as follows: ARTICLE XII SECTION 21.101. Fire Protection Taxing Unit. There is hereby created a West Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit under the authority of Section 125.01, Florida Statutes. The boundaries of the West Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit shall be that portion of Township 31 South, lying west of lateral "U" and that portion of Township 32 South and Township 33 South, lying west of Interstate Highway I-95, all lying and being within Indian River County, Florida. A INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE N0. 80-25 AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE WEST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT, DEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID TAXING UNIT AUTHORIZING THE LEVY BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA OF A TAX NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) MILLS ON ALL THE REAL AND TANGIBLE TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN SAID TAXING UNIT, PROVIDING FOR THE BUDGET AND ASSESS- MENT, LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF SUCH TAXES WITHIN SAID TAXING UNIT, PROVIDING FOR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS WITH MUNICIPALITIES, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NHEREAS, Florida Statutes, Section 125.01, (1) , (q) establishes the power of a non -chartered county to levy ad valorem taxes within the constitutional limits fixed for municipal purposes within a municipal service taxing unit established on properties lying within the unincorporated areas of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, Section 125.01, (1), (q), Florida Statutes grants the Board of County Commissioners of a non -charter county, the power to establish a municipal taxing unit for any part or all of the unincorporated areas of the, County within which may be provided fire protection from funds derived from taxes within such unit only; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. A new Ordinance of the Code of Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida, to be designated as Chapter 21, Article XII, is hereby adopted to read as follows: ARTICLE XII SECTION 21.101. Fire Protection Taxing Unit. There is hereby created a West Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit under the authority of Section 125.01, Florida Statutes. The boundaries of the West Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit shall be that portion of Township 31 South, lying west of lateral "U" and that portion of Township 32 South and Township 33 South, lying west of Interstate Highway I-95, all lying and being within Indian River County, Florida. A • MAY 2 11980 � Box 43 +xE 5,32 SECTION 21.102. Determination of Cost of Service. Said Municipal Service Taxing Unit is created for the purpose of providing fire protection within the boundaries of said Unit. The Board of County Commissioners in Indian River County, Florida, shall determine each year the cost of providing fire protection, including capital and equipment improvements, rentals and acquisitions, operating and maintenance costs and expenses, for the ensuing County fiscal year within the boundaries of said Unit. Section 21-103. Levy of Taxes, Adoption of Budget. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, hereby authorizes a levy of tax not to exceed three (3) mills on all real and tangible property within said West Indian River County Fire Protection Municipal Service Taxing Unit created under the provisions of this Ordinance for the purpose of providing fire protection within the boundaries of said unit. Said tax shall be levied and a budget prepared and adopted by the Board at the same time and in the same manner as the Board prepares and adopts its County Annual Budget and levies taxes as provided by law. Said taxes shall be assessed, levied, collected, be remitted to and accounted for at the time and in the manner as the assessments, levies, collections, remittance and accountability of taxes by said Board as provided law. Said budget shall contain all or such portions of the estimated cost of providing fire protection within the boundaries of such unit, determined under the provisions of Section 21-102 of this Ordinance, as said Board shall determine to be necessary to provide such services. Section 21-104. Disposition of Proceeds from Levy of Taxes for Fire Protection. Those funds obtained from the levy of a tax on all real and tangible property within the boundaries of said unit shall be maintained in a separate account and used solely for the purpose of providing fire protection within the boundaries of such unit only. -2- � 1 Section 21-105. Authority for Interlocal Agreements. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, as the governing body of said unit, may enter into interlocal agreement, under the provisions of Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, with any municipality, special district or other governmental unit located within Indian River County, Florida, for the purpose of providing fire protection within such municipality, special district or other governmental unit or for the purpose of providing mutual aid arrangements with such governmental entities. Section 21-106. Repeal. Any Ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 21-101. Severability. It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance shall be construed as not having contained said section, subsection, sentence, clause or provision, and shall not be effected by such holding. Section 21-108. This Ordinance shall become effective immedi- ately upon its adoption and filing as provided by law. DONE AND ADOPTED in regular session this 21st day of May, 1980. This Ordinance shall take effect May 27, 1980. -3- AAY 211980 BOOK" s 43 Pac3y MAY 211980 Roos 41-mv54 COMMISSIONER WODTKE ANNOUNCED THAT UNDER HIS MATTERS, HE WILL BRING UP A REPORT CONCERNING THE 1980 CENSUS AND ASK FOR SOME INPUT CONCERNING THE CENSUS. SENIOR PLANNER MARSH APPROACHED THE BOARD IN REGARD TO A REQUEST FROM CHARLIE BATTLES FOR RELEASE OF EASEMENT IN KINGS MUSIC LAND SUBDIVISION. HE REFERRED TO THE FOLLOWING LETTERS: INDIAN ' RIVER COUNTY March 27, 1980 MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Jack Jennings, County Administrator vid Marsh, Senior Planner Easement Release Request This request for the release of the 6' public utility and drainage easement on the common side lot line of Lots 13 and 14, Block 2, Kings Music Lands Subdivision, have been reviewed by the following agencies: .f Southern Bell Telephone Company Florida Power & Light Utilities Department Written responses from Florida Power &Light and the Utilities Depart- ment were not received. However, a follow-up indicated that neither had any objections to the release. Based on the responses and staff analysis, it is recommended that the easement be released considering that front and rear swales are adequate for drainage purposes combined with the fact that sufficient cross drain- age is also provided on all blocks. —D-11 DM: 't —32— Security Title Of Orevard Inc. 855 CENTRE - 855 Miracle Mile Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: 569-1500 May 2, 1980 Zoning Department Attention: David Marsh RE: Charles Battles and Brenda Battles Lots 13 and 14, Block 2, KINGS MUSIC LANDS SUBDIVISION Dear Mr. March: At the request of Mr. Battles we have searched the Public Records of Indian River County to May 1, 1980 @ 8:00 A. M. and found the following: 1. Title appears to be vested in Charles Battles and Brenda Battles by Warranty Deed recorded in Official Record Book 589, page 0096 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. 2. 1979 real estate taxes appear as paid. 3. We find no liens or judgments of record. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact his office. Yoursy, �,L'y" C. Lade-, Jr. esidene pls Encl. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION N0. 80-45 APPROVING RELEASE OF EASEMENTS IN KINGS MUSIC LAND SUBDIVISION, BLOCK 2, AS REQUESTED BY CHARLIE BATTLES, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN; THESE DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE APPLICANT. -33- MAY 211980 acox 43 ,p t 04'. MAY 2 1190 c� ��eey���++ Ea01i�_ _ 4J - PdGE ilJU RESOLUTION NO. 80-45 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, have been requested to release the lot line easements on the south three (3) feet of Lot 13; and the north three (3) feet of Lot 14, Block 2, King's Music Lands, according to the Plat of same recorded in Plat Book 6, page 17, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, said lot line easements were dedicated on the Plat of King's Music Lands for public utility purposes; -and WHEREAS, the request for such release of easement has been submitted in proper form; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following lot line easements in King's Music Lands, shall be released, abandoned and vacated as follows: The south three (3) feet of Lot 13; and the north three (3) feet of Lot 14, Block 2, Kings Music Lands according to the Plat of the same filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, in Plat Book 6, at page 17. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and the Clerk of the Circuit Court be and they hereby are authorized and directed to execute a release of said lot line easements hereinabove referred to in form proper for recording and placing in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Thi s 21st day of May , 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Attest: Freda Wri-ght, Cl eK RELEASE OF EASEMENT This Release of Easement, executed this 21s tday of M av , 1980, by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, first party; to Charles Battles and Brenda Battles, whose mailing address is 4340 35th Avenue, Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida, second party: WITNESSETH: That the said party of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by the said second.party, does hereby remise, release, abandon, and quit claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described easement, lying on land situate in the County of Indian River County, State of Florida, to -wit: The south three (3) feet of Lot 13; and the north three (3) feet of Lot 14, Block 2, Kings Music Lands, a subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 6, Page 17, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining and all estate, right, title, interest,equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party either in law or equity to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF-, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents by the parties so authorized by the law the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF in the presence of: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY W. W. Siebert, Jr , eMirman Attest: 4 X0 Freda Wright, C1 r 3+ MAY 2 11980 �J t MAY `211990 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Boot. 43. PA'* W 5,38 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgements personally appeared, W. W. SIEBERT, JR., as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County; a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and FREDA WRIGHT, as Clerk of the Circuit Court, to me known to be the persons duly authorized by said County to execute the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same for and on behalf of the said political subdivision. WITNESS my hand and seal in the County and State last aforesaid this _21st day of May 1980. 1 I�IZ4140:6� Notary Pup ic, State f F ori at Large. My commission expires: WTAV IC staTI IF RMIDA AT LUM My COMMISSION FXPIgn JULY 8 19 a2 (Notary Seal) % Im. LNMUITVS THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE COUNTY PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF OSLO ROAD FOR A PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE AND REFERRED TO THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUMS: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT jl May 2, 1980 ������� D %��n vivo♦ i � MEMO;,��,� + TO: James Burns, Superintendent of Schools FROM: David M. Rever, Planning and Zoning Director SUBJECT: Proposed School Site - South of Oslo Road This department has, as requested by the Board of County Commissioners, been asked by the County Administrator to review the proposed school site and to respond with comments and recommendations. The following report is this department's analysis of the site located off of 18th Avenue between 11th and 13th Streets. The zoning of the property in question is R-1 residential as are the surrounding parcels and lots. This zoning classification permits schools as a special exception after site plan approval. Some general character- istics of the property include a relatively flat terrain ranging from 23-25 feet Mean Sea Level. Vegetation is limited to primarily pine trees with some cabbage palms, palmettos and other assorted flat wood shrubs. Surrounding land uses consist of some sporadic scattered homes with the predominance of surrounding properties being vacant. There does not appear to be any major wet areas on the property, and a review of the Flood Insurance Maps indicate that none of the property is within a de- signated flood plain. Generally, the site would appear to be suitable for this proposed use. R In terms of the staff's current efforts, the preliminary planning was towards recommending that this tract be developed into a community/ neighborhood parkin the upcoming Comprehensive Plan. The staff does an- ticipate the need for more recreational facilities in this area as growth continues. The development of'a school on this site could, of course, still provide for recreational facilities as called for in the.Comprehensive Plan. Cooperative utilization of the facilities is a standard procedure in most communities, and the staff will be encouraging this approach in the future. However, another consideration is the long-range educational and recreational needs of the southeast portion of the county. It should be noted that the General Development - Vero Highlands Master Plan does provide for an 18 acre elementary school site as well as several park sites. It is the staff's feeling that dedication of these sites to the county could potentially be negotiated, and as such possibly have a bearing on the 2121 14 It" AVE. DAVID M. REVER • DIRECTOR VERO BEACH. FL 32960 • 305/567-51421, MAY 211980 -37- got. PAGE 5139 q MAY 2x.1980 bow 43 PnE 540 James Burns May 2, 1980 Page -2- long-term assessment of school and park needs in this area. In any event, it is recommended that there should be a memorandum of agreement or some other suitable instrument to stipulate the availability and terms for using school facilities as county wide recreational centers. The designated school site in Vero Highlands is approximately 4000 lineal feet south and east of the 18th Avenue site, with the existing Citrus School being approxi- mately 4800 lineal feet,to the northwest. In this regard the staff feels there is a need to consider the long-term prospects for the overall south county needs. Care should be taken to insure that a determination is made as to the most suitable location for an elementary school as well as an analysis of whether another elementary (or secondary) school site will be needed for future growth. Further, it is felt that considerable additional study will need to be undertaken in terms of the overall transportation needs. In the preliminary Transportation Plan now being developed, the eventual need for collectors is cited along the 20th Avenue and Kelly Road corridors. Problems are anticipated in providing for adequate roadways in that there is no current means to provide for a direct alignment on 20th Avenue. In the case of Kelly Road, there is the added consideration that the road right-of-ways are split with a drainage canal in the middle. Thus careful consideration should be given these matters in regard to any improvement plan. Staff will be pre- pared to discuss this further. Finally, in conjunction with the transportation provisions, recent occur- rences have shown the advisability of planning for bikeways in conjunction with public facilities, particularly in the case of an elementary school. Staff would strongly urge that provisions for bike paths be included as an integral part of any future roadway improvement program which may be approved. Concurrent development of a collector route with a related bike path would seem to be the most cost effective and practical means of proceeding. The development of major facilities are of considerable impact on the surrounding community. One of those impacts is the necessity to provide adequate vehicle and pedestrian access. It is recommended that the developers, in this case the School Board, should be required to assume responsibility for improving or building all transportation access to the intended facility., It is also recommended that some consideration be given to the anticipated availability of utility services in these areas. The provision of public water and sewer is of course the most desirable approach for an intensive use such as an elementary school. DMR: jt Enclosure Telephone (305) 567.7165 SUNCOM No. 465 - 1011 crunni Qnnon S'CUC'CL .U1ST11G11C Y CY JNiiull,XXN IU1'VIEIU 'C'C'UN T V JOE N. IDLETTE,JR. 1426 19th Street - P. 0. Box 2648 - Vero Beach, Florida 32960 JAMES A. BURNS, Superintendent MEMORANDUM: May 6, 1980 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Jim Burns Chairman _ GARY W. LINDSEY �- Vice -Chairman RICHARD A. BOLINGER RUTH R. BARNES DOROTHY A. TALBERT RE: SCHOOL SITE SOUTH OF OSLd ROAD — SEE ATTACHED MEMO FROM MR. DAVID REVER, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR d I have reviewed Mr. Rever's memorandum and discussed it at some _length with him. His review does coincide with our planning, and I am responding to pertinent points. Adequacy of Oslo Park Site - The State Department of Education has approved the Oslo Road site. The site meets all our standards and expectations. We are presently negotiating with General Development Corporation over the Vero Highlands site; this site would be part of a twenty-year plan. We do not consider the Vero Highlands site as desirable as the Oslo Road site since our major growth in student population is in the western portion of the South County. Also we antici- pate a decline in the Osceola School area which can easily serve the U.S. 1 corridor if the south county growth is beyond expectations during the next ten years. Recreation/Community Use - The School Board has favored community utilization and development of school buildings and sites. The School Board has implemented a community education program and tries to work with governmental agencies and others to increase utilization of school sites and buildings. I believe our School Board will strongly support a memorandum of agreement with the County Commission dealing with this subject. Transportation - The lack of a paved access is our Board's major concern' about the Oslo Park site. I believe the School Board would be very disappointed with the condition of "the School Board being required to assume responsibility for improving or building all transportation access to the intended facility." We have not anticipated road paving as a cost in our building program other than on our site and such action would have questionable legal basis. I hope my responses suffice for the County Commission's need so that you can make your decision about the Oslo Park site. My Board has indicated anxiety over closure in this matter, and I urge your early consideration of our request. I will be happy to review any aspect of this matter with you individually or collectively. lm r cc: School Board COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT.THEY HAD TALKED ABOUT UTILIZING THE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN EXCHANGE FOR PAVING THE ROAD 'n CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THEY HAD NOT ANTICIPATED ROAD PAVING AND THERE IS NO MONEY SET ASIDE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS. HE FELT THAT A SWAP -OFF FOR RECREATIONAL USE IS NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE OF THE ROAD. -39- MAY 211980 1x041( 43 f4GE.5411.. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED,AND SENIOR PLANNER MARSH DISPLAYED A MAP SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ADVISED THE STREETS ARE 70' WIDE, AND THE COUNTY DOES CLEAR AND MAINTAIN ROADS WHERE THEY HAVE SUFFICIENT BUILDINGS TO WARRANT IT. HE ADDED THAT IF A SCHOOL IS PUT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THERE ARE BUSES GOING IN THERE, THE ROAD MUST BE PAVED TO THE SCHOOL AND PROPER ' TURN -AROUND SPACE WOULD HAVE TO BE PROVIDED. COMMISSIONER LYONS THOUGHT THE COUNTY ONLY PAVED STREETS WHEN THERE WAS A PETITION TO PAVE THEM. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INTERJECTED THAT THEY HAVE DONE PAVING ON CERTAIN OCCASIONS WITHOUT A PETITION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THOUGHT THE BEST ANALOGY TO THIS SITUATION WOULD BE THE NEW HOSPITAL. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY DID SOME OF THE CLEARING. FOR THE HOSPITALIBUT THE HOSPITAL PAID THE COUNTY FOR THEIR SERVICES. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT BY DONATING THE LAND TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, IT IS AN AMPLE CONTRIBUTION, AND FELT THE PAVING OF THE ROAD SHOULD BE PAID FOR BY THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, HE CONTINUED THAT IN THE CASE OF THE HOSPITAL, IT WAS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AND THEY PAID FOR IT. COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED AND THOUGHT THE COUNTY HAD TO BE CONSISTENT. SENIOR PLANNER MARSH SAID ONE OF THE PROBLEMS IS PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE NORTH -SOUTH THOROUGHFARE IN THIS SYSTEM; 10TH AVENUE FROM OSLO ROAD TO KELLY ROAD IS NOW SERVING AS A THOROUGHFARE. HE CONTINUED THAT THE PLANNING STAFF DID NOT FEEL IT WAS.A GOOD THING TO GO FROM 20TH AVENUE TO 19TH AVENUE AND MAKE A JOG AND THAT A CONTINUATION OF 20TH AVENUE ALL THE WAY THROUGH IN OSLO PARK WOULD BE BEST. -40- COMMISSIONER WODTKE WONDERED WHO WOULD BE PAYING FOR THE ROAD TO THE SCHOOL. HE FELT THAT IF THE ROAD WAS AN EXTENSION OF 20TH AVENUE, THE COUNTY COULD JUSTIFIABLY PARTICIPATE. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS CONCURRED WITH THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THAT 20TH AVENUE SHOULD GO THROUGH. HE THEN GAVE AN EXAMPLE ON 43RD AVENUE WHERE THE COUNTY HAD TO BUILD A ROAD QUICKLY AFTER THE SCHOOL BOARD BUILT A SCHOOL THERE. COMMISSIONER LAY STATED SHE WOULD LI -KE TO ASSIST THE SCHOOL BOARD AND THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THE COUNTY HAS BEEN PRIVILEGED TO KNOW THE LOCATION OF A PROJECT BEFORE IT IS BUILT. SHE CONTINUED THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THE SCHOOL BOARD GO ON RECORD AS TO THEIR PARTICIPATION. COMMISSIONER L.OY COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD SHOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT THEIR PLANS ARE BEFORE ANYTHING IS APPROVED. COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT THE BOARD MUST KNOW THEIR FINAL PLAN. HE ALSO WOULD LIKE TO SEE A SOLID RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE TRAFFIC NETWORK. COMMISSIONER LYONS EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT WHAT THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY REALLY IS, AS HE DOES NOT FEEL QUITE COMFORTABLE ABOUT THE MATTER YET. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS POINTED OUT THAT WHEN THE PLAT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS PUT ON RECORD, IT WAS JUST TO BE FOR RECREATIONAL, PUBLIC OR SCHOOL PURPOSES ONLY. - CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED -THAT THE BOARD SHOULD BE SURE THAT ANY TIME IN THE FUTURE THAT ANY COOPERATIVE EFFORT FOR COMMUNITY- WIDE FACILITIES IS PROPOSED, THAT IT IS RECOGNIZED AS THE OWNERSHIP OF THE COUNTY, IN OTHER WORDS, ANY CONTRIBUTIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THOSE FACILITIES SHOULD BE CREDITED TO THE COUNTY. WILLIAM KOOLAGE, INTERESTED CITIZEN, FELT THE SCHOOLS SHOULD STAND ON THEIR OWN AND NOT BE SUBSIDIZED BY THE COUNTY IN ANYTH.I.NG THEY DO; THE COUNTY LEVIES AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE COUNTY, NOT FOR THE SCHOOL. HE ADDED THAT HE FELT THE SCHOOL HAS THE TAXING POWER AND SHOULD TAKE CARE OF ALL THE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AND NOT ASK THE COUNTY - IT WOULD BE A GRAVE MISTAKE FOR THE COUNTY TO TAKE THIS ON. MR. KOOLAGE POINTED OUT THAT IF THE COUNTY IS GETTING BACK RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN EXCHANGE, THEY MUST DECIDE WHAT THEY.ARE GETTING, DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR, FOR THEIR DONATION. 43 , p� 543 MAY 2 11980 -41- eQOK MAY 2x.1980 mot Q wr544 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT HE ASSUMED THE DIRECTION IS TO COME UP WITH AN OVER-ALL TRAFFIC STUDY; THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, IF IT IS FOR PRIMARY USE OF THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, SHOULD BEAR THE EXPENSE. THE BOARD AGREED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN ASKED ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS TO GET TOGETHER WITH SUPERINTENDENT BURNS AND SUPPLY THE SCHOOL BOARD WITH A COPY OF THE MINUTES CONCERNING THIS DISCUSSION. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED'A REQUEST FROM THE ROSELAND PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. TO LOWER THE SPEED LIMIT ON ROSELAND ROAD FROM U. S. 1 TO S.R. 512. MR. LAPPIN, OF ROSELAND, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND STATED THERE IS DEFINITELY A HAZARD FOR SCHOOL CHILDREN ALONG THAT ROAD AS THERE IS NO PLACE TO WALK OR RIDE THEIR BIKES. HE FELT THAT 45 MPH WAS DEFINITELY TOO HIGH A SPEED FOR A TWO LANE ROAD WITH NO SHOULDERS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT THEN READ THE FOLLOWING LETTER OF RECOMMENDA- TION FROM THE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, -42- P. O. BOX 608 PHONE 562-7911 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: SAM T. JOYCE . 1 N'DLt' Rlt L1: COU :Vn- MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION VF.RO Br—kclI, FLORID -1 O_I)GO May 7, 1980 On May 1, 2 and 5, 1980 this Reporting Officer conducted a traffic survey on Roseland Road, C-505 from U.S. #1 to C-512. The purpose of the survey was to ascertain if the posted speed limits on this roadway is a safe speed, as portions of this roadway is heavily populated. An observation of this roadway revealed the speed limit is posted at 45 miles per hour from U.S. #1 to Havenview Drive and from Havenview Drive through to C-512 is posted at 55 MPH. It is the opinion of this officer that the posted speed of 45 MPH from U. S. #1 to Haven - view Drive could possibly be lowered to 35 MPH, as this portion of the roadway is the most heavily populated and consideration should be given to the residents for their safety and well being. From Havenview Drive onward to C-512, it is the opinion of this officer that the posted speed of 55 MPH is an adequate speed as this is a more open roadway with less population. (See attached supplement for results of survey). This survey was conducted by this Reporting Officer utilizing a hand held radar gun and was parked at various locations between U.S.#1 and C-512 on Roseland Road. This survey was conducted by Kenneth E. Hamilton with the Indian River County Sheriff's Department at the request of Captain Doyle Stroud. C..f ' lam% r. � •Y?'I(_ - �f� Kenneth E. Hamilton Criminal Investigator KEH/bwk \� I CONCUR WITH TH.. RECOMMENDATION FROM THE SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT 't f>r 7 THAT �,PQRTIOO OF ROSEL ND pOADFROM TO AUEN1 I EW R IVE BE { LOWERED TO 35 M.P.H. 9^rn� ACK I NGS :>0 tiAY 2 11990 It"01 AY 2 119 80 eflaK 43 PAU546 DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE SPEED LIMITS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO LOWER THE SPEED LIMIT AS RECOMMENDED IN THE LETTER OF MAY 7, 1980 FROM THE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT. THE BOARD THEN ASKED ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS TO NOTIFY THE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT OF THIS ACTION. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED -THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM CONCERNING .JUDGE VOCELLE'S REQUEST FOR A CODE -A -PHONE: May 14, 1980 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Neil A. Nelson, Asst. County Administrator SUBJECT: Judge Vocelle's request of May 7, 1980 1. A code -a -phone was installed in Judge Sharp's office to provide an answering service when he and his secretary were not in the office. Judge Smith had a code -a -phone installed when the Circuit Court Clerks were moved to the 2001 Building. 2. Judge Vocelle has requested a code -a -phone for the reasons specified in his memo of May 7, 1980. (Enclosed) 3. The cost of the code -a -phone is $50.00 per installation and $30.00 a month service charge. Since we have installed this service for two Judges, I recommend we install a code -a -phone for Judge Vocelle. NAN:ms Neil Nelson, As�t�ountyAdmin. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THE CODE -A -PHONE WOULD BE USED ON A TEMPORARY BASIS AND WILL NOT BE NEEDED IN THE NEW COURTHOUSE COMPLEX. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR A CODE -A -PHONE FOR JUDGE VOCELLE. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE REQUEST FOR A 220 VOLT POWER ACCESS FROM DR. C. C. FLOOD, AS FOLLOWS: =44- _ SZ A":I: OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 3ca �os•.AM, Gc.-G•;�= Health & Rehabilitative Services INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH UNIT 2525 — 14th AVENUE VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 May 13, 1980 Co "`• Mr. Neil Nelson �` ^ ^' '• �'. Assistant County Administrator P. 0. Box 1028 Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 ira��e��2}1° Subject: 220 Volt Power Access Dear Mr. Nelson: In accordance with the memo from Clifford H. Cole, M. D., we request the installation of a 220 Volt Power access for the Mobile Diagnostic X -Ray Unit which will be used at our build- ing beginning July 1, 1980. This unit will be used to x-ray the Indian River County patients who have previously had the x-ray taken inside the building. Thank you for your attention to the request. Sincerely yours, C.C. FLOOD, M. D. Director fcg Enc. ' by: ell � Frances C. Greene STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Bob Graham. Governor Health & Rehabilitative Services L:..... ... f i u--.- J.D i i. .... POST OFFiCZ °':?X 210 JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA .32231. May 1, 1980 4DTB SUBJECT: 220 Volt Power Access.for New Mobile Diagnostic X -Ray Units T0: Select County Health Department Directors Community Tuberculosis Control Services has purchased new 1417 compact chest radiographic units for use in the various county tuberculosis diagnostic x-ray clinics. These units will be assembled and transported in motorized walk-in vans, replete with dressing rooms and dark rooms. The vans are now being fabricated and should be available before July 1, 1980. This new equipment has snecial Dower line reouirements. Therefore, county health departments currently in need of diagnostic x-ray service should make Drovisions to have a 220V power line installed and accessible as a source of electrical power for operating the new mobile x-ray units. Each health department should consult with the diagnostic x-ray technician in considering the most convenient location for installation of the Dower hook-up. Clients should have easy accessability to the van, and reserved Darking space will be necessary on clinic days. This new approach, designed primarily to replace obsolete eouip- ment, will result in improved service to 'your county. Clifford H. Cole, M.D., M.P.H. Director Community Tuberculosis Control Services CHC/RFG/1w k /Iz 5ry PACE MAY 2 111980 n MAY 2 119 80 mnK 43 PAE 548 ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON RECOMMENDED THE PROPOSAL FROM B & W ELECTRIC, INC. AS FOLLOWS: Urpinniti Page No. of Pages All material R guaranteed to be as specdad. All work to be completed "' wAuthor zed orkmanlike /,Atf manner aC ording to standard practices. Any all.min n or deviation from above spec�Hca / I /.I tans Involving eatra costs will be e—uted only upon written orders, and .an become an Signature ! / C1 LI � entre charge over and above the estimate. Aa agreements contingent upon stakes. ecGdents ���t / or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tom=.: other facessary--rue. Note: This proposal may be Our workers are fully covered by workmen's Comoensabon Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 days- Araptunrp of 11roposal —The above prices. specifications Signature and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized g to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR A 220 VOLT POWER ACCESS FOR THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. -46- 0 ' B & W ELECTRIC, INC. 1022 17th Place VERO BEACH, FIA. 32960 Phone 567.4452 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE •- DATE Indian River rounry May 15, 1980 STREET JOB NAME 2525 14th Ave. Attno—NeilHealth Dept, CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION VeroBeach.-FL 32960 ARCHITECT I DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Furnish and install material to wire for X-ray equipment at north endof Health Dept. west side of north door). 220 volt, 100 amp circuit to be taken from electric equipmentroom .......... --- and terminate in 100 amp raintight disconnect switch. _ . __. __.......... _. __.... _............. _ _...._.__. ._... .......... _ ...... _... -- _........... ..... _.._........... .__............._..._._. .._. . ...... . . ..... ... ........ ................ .... ........ ..__........_....._.._..._.._. __._. ..._.__................._.._........._.............._.._._ .......... _. _........._ .. _. _ ...._....... ...... ......... ......._...__._._... __.._ _.. __.......... .__.__... _........ ..._... .... _ Be propAIIe hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: five -hundred, eighty-five and 00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dollars (s Payment to be made as follows: Draws to be made as work progresses All material R guaranteed to be as specdad. All work to be completed "' wAuthor zed orkmanlike /,Atf manner aC ording to standard practices. Any all.min n or deviation from above spec�Hca / I /.I tans Involving eatra costs will be e—uted only upon written orders, and .an become an Signature ! / C1 LI � entre charge over and above the estimate. Aa agreements contingent upon stakes. ecGdents ���t / or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tom=.: other facessary--rue. Note: This proposal may be Our workers are fully covered by workmen's Comoensabon Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 days- Araptunrp of 11roposal —The above prices. specifications Signature and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized g to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUEST FOR A 220 VOLT POWER ACCESS FOR THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. -46- COMMISSIONER WODTKE NEXT REPORTED ON A SALARY STUDY FOR CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR NUZIE, WHO HAS BEEN WORKING AS A 30 HOUR A WEEK EMPLOYEE, EVEN THOUGH HE IS ON CALL 24 HOURS A DAY. HE RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD MAKE THE JOB A FULL TIME POSITION, WHICH WOULD CARRY THE NORMAL INCREASE IN SALARY. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ALSO SUGGESTED HAVING A COMPLETE SURVEY DONE, REWRITING THE JOB DESCRIPTION FOR CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR, AND BRINGING IT BACK BEFORE THE BOARD IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE NEXT BUDGET. HE ADDED. THAT THE STATE OF FLORIDA PAYS 50% OF MR. NUZIE'S SALARY AT THIS TIME. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER LYONS, TO MAKE THE CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR A FULL TIME POSITION BY EXTENDING HIS HOURS TO 37-2' HOURS WITH A COMMENSURATE SALARY BASED ON HIS BASE SALARY, EFFECTIVE WITH THE NEXT PAY PERIOD, AND DIRECT THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT TO REEVALUATE AND REWRITE THE JOB DESCRIPTION. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT HE IS NOW IN A PAY GRADE 9, WHICH IS A PART TIME BASIS. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT HIS OFFICE WILL REEVALUATE AND REDO THE JOB DESCRIPTION. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. THE BOARD NEXT CONSIDERED THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. COMMISSIONER DEESON ADVISED THAT THE APPOINTMENTS ARE INCOMPLETE AND HE HOPES TO FINALIZE THIS MATTER WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS. COMMISSIONER LOY NEXT DISCUSSED THE TRACKING STATION AND THE NEED FOR A RESOLUTION TO ACCOMPANY THE FORMAL APPLICATION. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 80-46 INDICATING THE BOARD'S INTEREST AND THE FACT THAT WE ARE MAKING FORMAL APPLICATION FOR THE TRACKING STATION PROPERTY. -47- SAY 2 1 190 Boa 43 PAGE 550 RESOLUTION NO. 80-46 WHEREAS, certain real property owned by the United States, located in the County of INDIAN RIVER, State of FLORIDA, has been declared surplus and at the discretion of the General Services Administration, may be assigned to the Secretary of the Interior for disposal for public park or recreation purposes, under the provisions of Section 203(k)(2) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (63 Stat. 387), as amended, and rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, more particulary described as follows: 1) PARCEL 1: All that tract or parcel of land lying and being in Government Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, Tallahassee Meridian, Indian River County, Florida, and more particularly described as follows: -Commencing-at a concrete monument which is on the South line and 349.14 feet S 890 45' 25" E of the Southwest corner of said Section 20, and at a corner of a tract of land owned in fee by the United States of America at Vdro Beach Tracking Annex; Thence N 00° 13' 15" E along the boundary of said United States tract and subsequently along the boundary of a tract of land conveyed to Indian River County, Florida, by the United States of America by quitclaim deed dated 24 August 1970, a distance of 1350.0 feet to a corner of said tracts and the POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence continue N 000 13' 15" E along the boundary of said United States tract 340 feet, more or less, to a point which is on the mean high water line of the Atlantic Ocean, and at a corner of said United States tract; Thence Southeasterly along the meanders of said high water line which is along the boundary of said United States tract 350 feet, more or less, to a point on a line which bears S 89° 45' 25" E from the point of beginning, at a corner of said United States tract and at a corner of said Indian River County tract; Thence N 89° 45' 25" W along the boundary of said United States tract which is along the boundary of said Indian River County tract 90 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 0.33 of an acre, more or less, and being a portion of Tract "A" of Vero Beach Tracking Annex. PARCEL 2: All that tract or parcel of land lying and being in Govern- ment Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, Tallahassee Meridian, Indian River County, Florida, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a concrete monument which is on the South line and 349.14 feet S 890 4525" E of the Southwest corner of said Section 20 and at a corner of a tract of land owned in fee by the United States of America at Vero Beach Tracking Annex; a Thence N 00° 13' 15" E along the boundary of said United States tract 1,000.00 feet to a point which is at a corner of said United States tract and at a corner of a tract of land conveyed to Indian River County, Florida, by the United States of America by quitclaim deed dated 24 August 1970,; Thence S 89° 45' 25" E along the boundary of said United States tract which is along the boundary of said Indian River County tract, 208 feet, more or less, to a point which is on the mean high water line of the Atlantic Ocean and at a corner of said tracts; Thence Southeasterly along the meanders of said mean high water line which is along the boundary of said United States tract, 1050 feet, more or less, to a point which is on the South line of said Section 20 and at a corner of said United States tract; Thence N 89° 45' 25" W along the boundary of said United States tract which is along the South line of said Section 20, a distance of 481.14 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Parcel 2 contains 8.04 acres, more or less, and is a part of Tract "A" of Vero Beach Tracking Annex. EXCESS EASEMENT LAND TRACT NO. A -101-E A strip of land 50 feet in width lying 25 feet on each side of the following described center line: Commence at the Southwest corner of the East 10 acres of Government Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Range 40 East, Indian River County, for a point of reference; thence Northerly along the West line of said East 10 acres of Government Lot 1 222 feet, more or less, to the center line of an existing paved road and the Point of Beginning of the center line being described herein; From said Point of Beginning, thence run Westerly along the center line of said existing paved road 210 feet, more or less, to the Easterly right-of-way line of existing State Highway A -1-A and the Point of Termination, containing 0.24 acres more or less. _ _ 2) GSA control Number D -FLA -675A 3) Two non-contiguous parcels of land containing approximately 8.37 + acres. One parcel consists of 8.04 + acres with an easement of .24 acres connecting it to Highway A -1-A. The second tract is .33 + acre. and WHEREAS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, needs and will utilize said property in perpetuity for a public park or recreation area as set forth in its application and in accordance with the requirements of said Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That INDIAN RIVER COUNTY shall make application to the Secretary of the Interior for and secure the transfer to it of the above mentioned property for said use upon and subject to such exceptions, reservations, terms, covenants, agreements, conditions, and restrictions as the E4)QK 1 p � MAY 2 11980 y. MAY 2x.1980 Q.-PAu-552 Secretary of Interior, or his authorized representative, may require in connection with the disposal of said property under said Act and the rules and regulations issued.pursuant thereto; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, has legal authority, is willing and is in a position to assume immediate care and maintenance of the property, and that the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., CHAIRMAN, or his designee, be and he or she is or they are hereby authorized, for and on behalf of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, to do and perform any and all acts and things which may be necessary to carry out the foregoing resolution, including the preparing, making and filing of plans, applications, reports and other documents, the execution, acceptance, delivery, and recordation of agreements, deeds, and other instruments pertaining to the transfer of said property, including the filing of copies of the application and the conveyance documents in the records of the governing body, and the payment of any and all sums necessary on account of the purchase price thereof or fees or costs incurred in connection with the transfer of said property for survey, title searches, recordation of instruments, or other costs identified with the Federal surplus property acquisition. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 21st day of May, 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER CO UN Y, L RID By Willard W. Siebert, J ., Chairman 2145 - 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 I, WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., hereby certify that I am the CHAIRMAN of the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; and that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution adopted by the vote of a majority of the members of said BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, present at a meeting of said body on the 21st day of May, 1980. J1,4e,/ � BOO,4 ' :F, MAY 211989 _I SAY 2 11990 Boo+ - 41- FACE 554 ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS MODIFIED THE LEASE BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTER WITH A NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND HE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL., ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTER. -52- AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS AMENDMENT TO LEASE dated the 21st day of May r 1980, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR", and the SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTER OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "LESSEE"; W I T N E S S E T H: That on the 20th day of February,_ 1980, the LESSOR and the LESSEE entered into a Lease Agreement wherein the LESSEE leased to the LESSOR the following described property: Starting at the southwest corner of the South- east 1/4 of Section 2, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, as designated on the last general plat of lands of the Indian River Farms Company, filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, in Plat Book 2, page 25; said land now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida; run East along the North right of way line of 16th Street a distance of 943.19 feet; thence run North along the West right of way line of 17th Avenue a distance of 463.5 feet, to a point of beginning; thence run West parallel to the North right of way line of 16th Street a dis- tance of 250 feet; thence run North 245 feet; thence run East 251.25 feet; thence run South 245 feet to the point of beginning. LESSOR and LESSEE now agree to modify the legal description above described and to incorporate the following new legal description as the property which shall be the subject of the Lease dated February 20, 1980. For valuable consideration the parties agree that the amended legal description shall be as follows: M.AY 2 11980 From the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of Section 2, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, as designated on the last general plat of lands of the Indian River Farms Company filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida in Plat Book 2, page 25; said lands now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida; run North along the quarter section line 80 feet to a point on the North right-of-way line of 16th Street; thence run East along the North right-of-way line of 16th Street a distance of 943.19 feet, more or less to a point on the West right-of- way line of 17th Avenue; thence run North along said right- of-way line a distance of 463.5 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel to be herein described; thence run West parallel to the North right-of-way line of 16th Street a distance of 250 feet ; thence North 245 feet; thence East 251.25 feet, more or less to a point on the aforesaid West right-of-way line of 17th Avenue; thence run South along said right-of-way line 245 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 1.41 acres, more' or less. 801'' PAGE 55 r � r MAT 2 11980 8009 4a" RUE 55.6 All of the terms, covenants and agreements of that Lease between the parties, dated the 20th day of February, 1980, remain unchanged and in full force and effect. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to Lease has been executed in duplicate in the name of and on behalf of the LESSOR by its Chairman and attested by its Clerk, who have been duly authorized by the action of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, so to do, and on the part of the LESSEE by its President and Secretary who have been duly authorized by its Board of Directors so to do, on the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN IVER,CO:T7Y F ORIDA By 04C 4 Chaifma JSk L Attest j/L to Lessor Clerk LESSOR As to Lessee SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTER OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC. By President Attest: Secretary LESSEE ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT DISCUSSED A LOAN RESOLUTION REGARDING THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM THAT FmHA HAS REQUESTED, WHICH -HE HAS PREPARED IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,825,900, AND RECOMMENDS FOR APPROVAL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 80-47 FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM. Position 5 t USDA-FmHA Form FmHA 44247 LOAN RESOLUTION �- (Rev. 4-9-76) (Public Bodies) No. 80-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE ---------BOARD OF THE --Indian River�County-_Commission________.___________ AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE INCURRENCE OF INDEBTEDNESS FOR THE PURPOSEOF PROVIDING A PORTION OF THE COST OF ACQUIRING, CONSTRUCTING, ENLARGING, IMPROVING, AND/OR EXTENDING ITS FACILITY TO SERVE AN AREA LAWFULLY WITHIN ITS JURIDICTION TO SERVE. WHEREAS, it is necessary for the- -Board_ of_ ou ty-__GQMMi5_510iler-9-0-f-Znd i an Ri-mex _Coznty, (Public Body) Florida (herein after called association) to raise a portion of the cost of such undertaking by issuance of its bonds in the principal amount of —� $�`� Q9- ------- ------ - ------------ — -__— - --- ___ ___ pursuant to the provisions of--- —__ CYu3.�te�_].59..-_-F1-Qri�da_..ta_tutors__t<.l9_Z5, _________.________ WHEREAS, the association intends to obtain assistance from the Farmers Home Administration, United States Department of Agriculture, (herein called the Government) acting under the provisions of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1921 et seq.) in the planning, financing, and supervision of such undertaking and to purchasing of bonds lawfully issued, in the event that no other acceptable purchaser for such bonds is found by the association: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises the association hereby resolves: 1. To have prepared on its behalf and to adopt an ordinance or resolution for the issuance of its bonds and containing such items and in such forms as are required by STATE statutes and as are agreeable and acceptable to the Government. 2. To refinance the unpaid balance, in whole or in part, of its bonds upon the request of the Government if at any time it shall appear to the Government that the association is able to refinance its bonds by obtaining a loan for such purposes from responsible cooperative or private sources at reasonable rates and terms for loans for similar purposes and periods of time as required by section 333(c) of said Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1983(c)). 3. To provide for, execute, and comply with Form FmHA 400-4, "Nondiscrimination Agreement"; and Form FmHA 400-1, "Equal Opportunity Agreement", including an "Equal Opportunity Clause", which clause is to be in- corporated in, or attached as a rider to, each construction contract and subcontract involving in excess of $10,000. 4. To indemnify the Government for any payments made or losses suffered by the Government on behalf of the association. Such indemnification shall be payable from the same source of founds pledged to pay the bonds or any other legally permissable source. 5. That upon default in the payments of any* principal and accrued interest on the bonds or in the performance of any covenant or agreement contained herein or in the instruments incident to making or insuring the loan, the Government, at its option may (a) declare the entire principal amount then outstanding and accrued interest immediately due and payable, (b) for the account of the association (payable from the source of funds pledged to pay the bonds or any other legally permissable source) incur and pay reasonable expenses for repair, maintenance, and operation of the facility and such other reasonable expenses as may be necessary to cure the cause of default, and/or (c) take possession of the facility, repair, maintain, and operate or rent it. Default under the provisions of this Resolution or any instrument incident to the making or insuring of the loan may be construed -by the Government to constitute default under any other instrument held by the Government and executed or assumed by the association, and default under any such instrument may be construed by the Government to constitute default hereunder. 6. Not to sell, transfer, lease, or otherwise encumber the facility or any portion thereof, or interest therein, not permit others to do so, without the prior written consent of the Government. 7. Not to borrow any money from any source, enter into any contract or agreement, or incur any other liabilities in connection with making enlargements, improvements or extensions to, or for any other purpose in connection with the facility (exclusive of normal maintenance) without the prior written consent of the Government if such undertaking would involve the source of funds pledged to pay the bonds. 8. To place the proceeds of the bonds on deposit in an account, in a bank, and in a manner approved by the Government. is - FmHA 442.47MCI FACE MAY 211980 = I MAY 211900 QQ BOO PAGE D 9. To comply with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations and to continually operate and maintain the facility in good condition. 10. To provide for the receipt of adequate revenues to meet the requirements of debt service, operation and maintenance, and the establishment of adequate reserves. No free service or use of the facility will be permitted. 11. To acquire and maintain such insurance coverage including fidelity bonds as may be required by the Government. 12. To establish and maintain such books and records relating to the operation of the facility and its financial affairs and to provide for required audit thereof in such a manner as may be required by the Government, to provide the Government without its request, a copy of each such audit, and to make and forward to the Government such additional information and reports as it may from time. to time require. 13. To provide the Government at all reasonable times access to all books and records relating to the facility and access to the property of the system so that the Government may ascertain that the association is complying with the provisions hereof and of the instruments incident to the -making or insuring of the loan. 14. To serve any applicant within the service area who desires service and can be feasibly and legally served, and to obtain the concurrence of the Farmers Home Administration prior to refusing service to such applicant. Upon the failure to provide such service which is feasible and legal such applicant shall have a direct right of action against the association under this agreement. The provisions hereof and the provisions of all instruments incident to the making or the insuring of the loan, unless otherwise specifically provided by the terms of such instruments, shall be binding upon the association as long as the bonds are held or insured by the Government. The provisions of sections 6 through 13 hereof may be provided for in more specific detail in the bond resolution or ordinance; to the extent that the provisions contained in such bond resolution or ordinance should be found to be inconsistent with the provisions hereof, these provisions shall be construed as controlling as between the association and the Government. The vote was: Yeas Nays ---.0--- ; Absent ---Q — . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the—_9h__AjJMdn of the Board of Counter Comms,p_______�______�____� has duly adopted this Resolution and caused it to be executed by the officers below in duplicate on this -2-1-3-t day of------MaX _ __ ._._____ ___ , 19 -8-31. . ." ')I,uIII I)I1: (SEAL) ;� } Attest: Title_.__---- Clerk ..........----- —---------- ---------------- B.,---------- Title Chairman -----------_--•------�----------------- Board o� County -Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, as ---- chairman____---- of the Board of Count Commissioners hereby certify that the of such Association is composed of --- - ------ members, of whom ----------- , constituting a quorum, were present at a meeting thereof duly called and held on the -21-5-t-- day of 19 -B-Q- ; that the foregoing resolution was adopted at such meeting by the vote shown above; and that said resolution has not been rescinded or amended in any way. Dated, this -21S -t--------_----- day of 19 -8-0 -- *L'. Q-- *L'. S.GPO:1976-0-665-664/2243 - 4�k WI;lrl, Title ---- ___ -- -- >P.r --- ------ - ----------------- - -- - Willard W.7.'Siebert, Jr., Chc.irman THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE INTERSECTION OF 90TH AVENUE AND CITRUS ROAD, AND THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM JAMES SPOSATO, SJR.: -mss _GRICULTURAL -n ..j ® P.O. BOX A VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 April 10, 1980 Mr. George G. Collins, Jr. c/o Board of County Commissioners 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Sir: (305) 562-6320 I am returning the Quick -Claim Deed for you to add what I said over the- phone. hephone. When this is added I will be happy to sign it. I said, The gate and fence must be put back the way it is, drainage put in and shell fill put over it. Addthis and I will sign it. Sincerely, dames Spos to, Jr. ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT .JAMES SPOSATO, JR. OWNS THE PROPERTY AND IS WILLING TO DONATE THE NECESSARY PROPERTY TO THE COUNTY BUT WANTS CERTAIN ASSURANCES, AS POINTED OUT IN HIS LETTER, AND WITH THOSE ASSURANCES, HE WILL CONVEY THE PROPERTY. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS COMMENTED THAT IT WOULD BE NO MAJOR PROBLEM. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUEST OF MR. SPOSATO, JR. AS OUTLINED IN HIS LETTER OF APRIL 10, 1980, AND AUTHORIZED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO ACCOMPLISH THIS MATTER. i .. 0 -57- 43vxf_,50 Boa MAY 2 119 0 MAY 2 1 190 = a THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECESSED AT 12:05 O'CLOCK P.M. FOR LUNCH AND RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT. ROBERT MARSHBANKS, BIKE PATH CHAIRMAN, VERO-TREASURE COAST KIWANIS CLUB, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO MAKE A SHORT REPORT ON THEIR PROGRESS TOWARDS RAISING THE MONEY NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT A BIKE PATH ou 12TH STREET BETWEEN 27TH AVENUE AND 20TH AVENUE. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT TO DATE, THEIR BIKE-A-THON HAS RAISED $10,600, WITH A FEW MORE PLEDGES LEFT TO COLLECT, AND HE FELT THAT THE COMMUNITY BY THEIR THOUSANDS OF SMALL DONATIONS HAS INDICATED THEIR HIGH INTEREST IN BIKE PATHS. MR. MARSHBANKS STATED THAT HIS CLUB WISHES TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE BOARD WANTS THEM TO CONTINUE THEIR EFFORTS TO TRY TO RAISE UP TO $20,000 OR WHETHER THE BOARD WOULD CONSIDER USING THE $10,600 FOR A MATCHING GRANT. HE FELT THERE MAY BE GRANTS AVAILABLE OF WHICH WE ARE NOT AWARE, AND POSSIBLY THE INTERGOVERN- MENTAL COORDINATOR MIGHT BE ABLE TO INVESTIGATE USING THE $10,600 AS MATCHING FUNDS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH ASKING COORDINATOR THOMAS TO CHECK INTO THIS. HE COMMENTED THAT THE MINUTES STATE THAT IF THE COMMUNITY WILL NOT GIVE SUFFICIENT SUPPORT TO RAISE ALL THE NECESSARY FUNDS, THEN THE BOARD WILL CROSS THAT BRIDGE WHEN WE COME TO IT, BUT HE DID NOT KNOW THAT WE HAVE REACHED THAT POINT. COMMISSIONER Loy WAS NOT VERY HOPEFUL THAT THERE ARE GRANTS OUT THERE THAT WE DON T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT. SHE FELT IF THE VERO- TREASURE COAST KIWANIS CLUB WISHES TO CONTINUE RAISING FUNDS FOR BICYCLE PATHS AS AN ON-GOING PROJECT, IT WOULD BE VERY WORTHWHILE, BUT WAS CONCERNED THAT IF WE DON'T GO ON AND COMPLETE THIS PROJECT, WHICH IS REALISTIC IN COST AND CONNECTS PRIORITY AREAS, THAT IT MAY BECOME LOST IN THE SHUFFLE. SHE WAS, THEREFORE, IN FAVOR OF ACCEPTING THE CLUB'S EFFORTS AND THE FUNDS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED; MATCHING THEM; GOING AHEAD WITH THIS PARTICULAR PROJECTjAND ENCOURAGING THE CLUB TO HAVE FUTURE PROJECTS FOR BIKE PATHS. -58- COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT INTEREST HAS BEEN SHOWN AND WE SHOULD DO SOMETHING. COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT BICYCLE PATHS COMMITTEE'S MEMO OF FEBRUARY 1ST STATED THAT THE "TREASURE COAST KIWANIS CLUB AND INTERESTED CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS WOULD LIKE TO ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE TO RAISE THE MONIES FOR THE FIRST PROJECT, AND IF THEY CANNOT ACCOMPLISH THIS GOAL IN 90 DAYS, THEY WOULD LIKE TO COME BACK AND REQUEST MORE TIME." HE WISHED TO KNOW IF THEY ARE NOW ASKING FOR ADDITIONAL TIME OR WHETHER AT THIS POINT THEY ARE SAYING THEY CANNOT RAISE ANY MORE FUNDS. MR. MARSHBANKS STATED THAT THE POSITIVE RESPONSE THEY GOT IN BEING ABLE TO RAISE OVER $10,000 AT ONE EVENT, WOULD LEAD HIM TO FEEL THAT IF THEY HAD ANOTHER EVENT LATER THIS SUMMER, THEY PROBABLY COULD RAISE MORE MONEY. HE POINTED OUT THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF OTHER PROJECTS THEY COULD RAISE FUNDS FOR, BUT NOW, WITH THE COMMUNITY INTEREST SO HIGH, THEY WOULD LIKE TO GET THIS PROJECT COMPLETED AS A SORT OF REWARD FOR THE COMMUNITY EFFORT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE SAW MR. MARSHBANKS POINT, BUT STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE FIRST PROJECT FINALIZED IN THE WAY IT WAS PROPOSED SO THAT IN FUTURE FUND RAISING PROJECTS, ORGANIZATIONS WILL NOT FEEL THEY CAN RAISE JUST HALF THE MONEY AND DEPEND ON -THE COUNTY FOR THE OTHER HALF. HE FEARED THAT IF WE CHANGE NOW, AFTER ONLY ONE FUND RAISING ATTEMPT, PERHAPS WE WOULD END UP WITH ANOTHER PROGRAM THAT WOULD FALL BACK ON THE AD VALOREM TAXPAYERS ALTOGETHER. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD PREFER TO GIVE THE CLUB ANOTHER 90 DAYS, OR WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO RAISE THE REST OF THE FUNDS, AND POSSIBLY FUTURE PROJECTS CAN BE APPROACHED ON A DIFFERENT BASIS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT.POINTED OUT THAT AN ADDITIONAL 90 DAYS WOULD NOT ALLOW FOR STARTING THE PROJECT BEFORE SCHOOL OPENS IN THE FALL, AND HE, THEREFORE, WOULD LIKE TO GIVE THEM ANOTHER 45 DAYS AND THEN POSSIBLY SPLIT THE DIFFERENCE. HE FELT .JULY 4TH MIGHT BE AN OPPORTUNE TIME FOR ANOTHER FUND RAISING EVENT. MR. MARSHBANKS WAS DUBIOUS ABOUT GETTING ANOTHER BIKE-A-THON TOGETHER BY .JULY 4TH, BUT STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO TRY. _59_ MAY 211980 gook 1W PPE MAY 2 11980 Box 43 '4' G'E' 5 2 COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED TAKING A STAB AT FUNDING NOT HALF, BUT A THIRD AND GOING AS FAR AS THE THIRD ALLOWS BECAUSE HE FELT IT IS REALLY IMPORTANT TO KEEP THE PROJECT MOVING. COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED, BASED ON THE VARIOUS COMMENTS MADE, THAT THE KIWANIS CLUB ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE TO CONDUCT ANOTHER BIKE-A-THON FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF COMPLETING THE 12TH STREET BIKE PATH. SHE NOTED THAT POSSIBLY IN THE MEANTIME, WE COULD MOVE AHEAD WITH THE STAKING OF THE RIGHT'S -OF -WAY, BUT SHE FELT THERE SHOULD BE ONE MORE ALL-OUT EFFORT MADE TO RAISE THE FUNDS. MR. MARSHBANKS STATED THAT THEY WOULD PREFER TO DO THIS RATHER THAN START A PROJECT AND NOT HAVE IT COMPLETED. COMMISSIONER LOY FELT THAT THE BOARD HAS INDICATED THEY WOULD LIKE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT, BUT EMPHASIZED THAT WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL AND NOT SET A PRECEDENT THAT WOULD BE UNCOMFORTABLE FOR FUTURE BOARDS. COMMISSIONER LYONS BROUGHT UP THE BOARDS POLICY OF PARTICI- PATING IN THE PAVING OF ROADS UP TO 25% AND THE COST OF MATERIALS AND SUGGESTED TAKING THE SAME STAND WITH BIKE PATHS, BUT COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT IN THAT SITUATION WE ARE PARTICIPATING WITH PROPERTY OWNERS ON EACH SIDE OF THE ROAD WHICH HE DID NOT FEEL IS WHAT COMMISSIONER LYONS INTENDS. COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED AND EXPLAINED THAT HE WAS JUST TRYING TO THINK OF A LOGICAL PERCENTAGE OF PARTICIPATION FOR THE COUNTY. COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT WE SET A SPECIFIC AMOUNT ASIDE IN THE BUDGET ON A PARTICIPATING BASIS FOR THE PAVING PROGRAM AND FELT THAT FOR THE BICYCLE PATH PROGRAM ALSO,POSSIBLY WE COULD SET ASIDE SOMETHING SPECIFIC IN A PARTICIPATING FUND AS MATCHING MONEY AND RELY ON COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOR THE OTHER 3/4. IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED THAT THE VERO TREASURE COAST KIWANIS CLUB WILL CONTINUE WITH THEIR FUND RAISING EFFORTS HEADED TOWARDS THE $20,000 GOAL AND COME BACK TO THE BOARD AFTER THE 4TH OF JULY. ENGINEER RALPH ENG OF THE .JOINT VENTURE REPORTED THAT A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD ON THE 201 PLANJAND HE NOW WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT AN UP TO DATE REPORT ABOUT WHAT HAS TO BE DONE TO PROCEED WITH ITS IMPLEMENTATION. HE THEN PASSED OUT THE FOLLOWING STATUS REPORT AND REQUESTED THAT COMMISSIONER WODTKE AS HEARING OFFICER SIGN THE CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ATTACHED THERETO. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , 201 FACILITIES PLAN STATUS REPORT Sverdrup & Parcel Job Number 4887 May 21, 1980 A. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Hearing held April 16, 1980 2. 10 -day period for additional comments 3. Transcript of Public Hearing including additional comments - for appendices 4. Statement of Certification confirming hearing and procedure (signatures by County and Consultant) - for appendices 5. Certification of Publication of Hearing Notice from newspaper (to be obtained from Press) - for appendices B. FINAL COMMENTS ON REVISED CHAPTERS OF 201 PLAN 1. DER .a. Comments received, reviewed and response being prepared b. Addendum to the necessary parts and chapters of 201 Plan being prepared - 2. City of Vero Beach a. Comments received, reviewed and response being prepared b. Addendum to the necessary parts and chapters of 201 Plan being prepared 1 �aax 43 563 MAY 2 1-1980 -61- MAY 211980 BUOK 3. Additional Joint Venture Effort 43 PAcE 584 a. Estimate Joint Venture effort not to exceed an upset figure of $3,000 (actual joint venture cost) to pre- pare response to comments and revisions as necessary to 201 Plan b. Joint Venture requests County to reimburse actual cost, no profit. C. RECOMMENDATIONS TO PROCEED WITH IMPLEMENTATION 1. Joint Venture prepare response to DER's and Vero Beach's comments by letter 2. Joint Venture prepare and present to the County Commission an addendum as necessary.to 201 Plan on second Commission meeting in June, 1980. County Commission approve the 201 Plan by resolution for submittal to DER and EPA for final approval and express intent to implement the Plan. 3. County complete request for exemption from DER to use mosquito impoundments (previously requested by DER's Mr. Richard Smith, P.E., Chief Bureau of Wastewater Management and Grants). 4. County request resolutions of approval from participating municipalities of the 201 Plan. 5. County request approval from DER and EPA for funding participation in the use of the mosquito impoundments 2 as soon as possible. Joint Venture will assist in preparation of request. 6. County request requirements from DER and EPA for certifi- cation to use mosquito impoundments as soon as possible. Joint Venture will assist in preparation of request. 7. County authorize Joint Venture to prepare application to EPA for Step 2 funding assistance. Submission of Step 2.application may be initiated after approval to 201 Plan by the County. This application needs to be submitted as soon as possible to be placed on EPA's priority funding list. 8. County work toward finalizing interlocal agreement with Vero Beach. 9. Joint Venture present to the County a proposed program for funding the local share of Phase I, determine the limits of Phase I, and prepare a report based.on FmHA requirements for necessary collection, minor trans- mission and pumping systems, and determine rate structure required. Program scheduled for presentation to County for review, approval and authorization in July, 1980. 3 e � M MAY 2x.1980 eooK 43' Face 56� . MAY 211980 Boa. 4j P'AcE 566 CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING I, William C. Wodtke, Jr. , do certify that on the sixteenth (16th) day of April, 1980, a public hearing was held by Indian River County, Florida, for the purpose of providing public participation in the Indian River County 201 Facilities Plan. I do certify that the proper notice was given by both advertisement and posting of legal notices, as well as mailing out notices to interested persons. I also certify that the meeting bras conducted according to the speci- fications as outlined under the Federal Register for public participaticn hearings. i%t�["�y (2 k�dw' Signature Indian River County, Flor' a 4er aturedrup w Parcel and Associates, Inc. 6eindorf and Associates, Inc. (A Joint Venture) MR. ENG INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS NOT HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE COMMENTS MADE AT THE HEARING, COPIES OF WHICH WERE FORWARDED TO HIM, BUT APPARENTLY LOST IN THE MAIL. HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE RECEIVED'COMMENTS FROM THE DER AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH ON THE REVISED CHAPTERS AND ARE IN THE PROCESS OF ANSWERING THOSE COMMENTS AND PREPARING AN ADDENDUM TO THE 201 PLAN TO REFLECT THE CHANGES AS REQUIRED. MR. ENG THEN DISCUSSED ITEM 3, SECTION B, AND EXPLAINED THAT IT WAS A YEAR AGO WHEN THEY WENT TO ATLANTA TO TRY TO GET THIS PROGRAM OFF THE GROUND, AND THEY EXPECT, IN ORDER TO ANSWER ALL THE COMMENTS AND PREPARE THE REVISED ADDENDUMS, THAT THEY WILL INCUR AN EXPENSE NOT TO EXCEED $3,000. THIS IS ACTUAL EXPENSE - NO PROFIT INVOLVED, AND THEY WOULD LIKE TO BE REIMBURSED. MR. ENG CONTINUED TO REVIEW THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROCEEDING WITH IMPLEMENTATION AS SET OUT IN THE STATUS REPORT - ITEMS C-1 THROUGH 9. HE STATED THAT THEY WILL BE WORKING CLOSELY WITH THE ADMINISTRATOR AND ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR AND FELT THAT LETTERS SHOULD BE WRITTEN TO EPA TO SEE IF WE CAN PUSH THEM FOR A COMMITMENT ON PARTICIPATING FUNDING ON THE MOSQUITO IMPOUNDMENTS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE CAN ACCEPT ALL THE RECOM- MENDATIONS EXCEPT SECTION B, ITEM 3, AND THE ONLY REASON -IS THAT THE BOARD HAS JUST BEEN HANDED THIS INFORMATION AND HAS NOT HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE CONTRACT OR HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF ABOUT THE EQUITY OR FAIRNESS OF THE $3,000. HE FELT THATIJUST AS A MATTER OF POLICY, THE BOARD WOULD NOT WANT TO CONSIDER THIS TODAY, BUT WOULD BE GLAD TO CONSIDER IT AT THE NEXT MEETING. HE FELT EVERYTHING ELSE SEEMED TO BE VERY MUCH IN LINE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT ITEM C-2 CALLS FOR BOARD APPROVAL OF THE 201 PLAN BY RESOLUTION AT THE SECOND MEETING IN JUNE AND SUBMITTAL TO DER AND EPA FOR FINAL APPROVAL. HE ASKED IF THIS IS TO BE DONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING RESOLUTIONS OF APPROVAL FROM THE PARTICIPATING MUNICIPALITIES. -65- MAY 211980 a�ac ' 43--ftn 67, Boot, 43 PA&E 568 , MR. ENG STATED THAT THE COUNTY MUST APPROVE THE PLAN FIRST, AND THIS IS A NECESSARY STEP IN ORDER TO KEEP THINGS MOVING., COMMISSIONER LYONS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WISHED TO OBTAIN SOME VERBAGE FROM MR, ENG FOR A LETTER AS A FOLLOW-UP TO THE MEETINGS HE HAD IN WASHINGTON IN FEBRUARY WITH THE STAFFS OF SENATORS CHILES AND STONE AND REPRESENTATIVE BAFALIS TO KEEP THEM AWARE OF OUR PROBLEMS, IF THE BOARD HAS NO�OBJECTIONS. THE BOARD HAD NO OBJECTION. MR. ENG FELT SUCH A LETTER TO THE EPA OR ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY WOULD BE STRONGER IF THAT LETTER WAS SUBMITTED AFTER THE COUNTY HAD THE PLAN APPROVED, AND COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD RELY ON MR. ENG FOR THE TIMING, BUT HE DID NOT WANT TO MISS ONE SECOND WHEN THE TIME CAME BECAUSE THE FUNDS ARE NOT TOO PLENTIFUL. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE STATUS REPORT DATED MAY 21, 1980 ON THE 201 FACILITIES PLAN AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS THEREIN, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM 3, SECTION B, WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE NEXT MEETING. COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF WE COULD GO AHEAD AND AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY AND ADMINISTRATOR TO PROCEED WITH PREPARING THE CORRE- SPONDENCE THAT WILL BE REQUIRED, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THE MOTION COVERS THAT. ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ENGINEER JOHN ROBBINS HAS BEEN WORKING ON A PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON ENTERING INTO OUR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, AND HE WOULD LIKE MR, ROBBINS TO REVIEW THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED DATES. SAID SCHEDULE IS AS FOLLOWS: —66- 171 1 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ITEM A. WATER SERVICE: 1. Gifford Area 2. Squared Off Area No. 2 3. Squared Off Area No.'I 4. Specified Commercial or Institutional Customers C73, .Lice 0 4 aG� TARGET DATE FOR ULTIMATE COUNTY UTILITY SERVICE 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 00 .e Q PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR 1980 CITY -TOWN -COUNTY AGREEMENT MAY 15, .1980 CONTROL ITERS COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION DATE *a. North County Water 1990 Plant a. Phase I 201 1986 b. Phase II South 1990 County Water Plant a. North County Water 1990 Plant b. Phase I 201 1986 *a. North County Water 1990 Plant b. Phase I South County 1982 Water Plant c. Phase I 201 1986 C73, .Lice 0 4 aG� TARGET DATE FOR ULTIMATE COUNTY UTILITY SERVICE 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 00 .e Q B. SEWER SERVICE: �r w a 1. Ralmar CWZ CD 2. Vero Med Area �c. 3. Squared Off Area No. 2 4. Squared Off Area No. 1 A S. Specified Commercial ,or Institutional Customers 6. U.S. 1 Corridor *a. North County Water Plant b. Phase I 201 *a. North County Water Plant b. Phase I 201 a. Phase I 201 b. Phase II South County Water Plant *a. North County Water Plant b. Phase I 201 *a. North County Water Plant b. Phase I South County Water Plant c. Phase I 201 a. Phase I 201 CD Go * Agreement states water service to notEd item is to be supplied from Gifford service area and water to originate from County sources. C\2 It is assumed a north County water plant will be required to expand >-- the Gifford service area. 1990 1986 1990 1986 1986 1990 1990 1986 1990 19 82 1986 1986 1990 1990 1990 1990 •S. 1 1 MR. ROBBINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT ITEMS LISTED IN THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE REPRESENT THOSE LISTED IN THE PROPOSED 1980 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE, WHICH REQUIRES THAT A CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE BE PLACED AT THE BACK OF THE AGREEMENT. MR. ROBBINS STATED THAT THE REASON HE HAS PRESENTED IT IN THIS PARTICULAR FORM IS TO GIVE AN INDICATION OF THE VARIOUS INTERRELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AND THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE; THE OVERLAPS THAT WILL OCCUR BETWEEN THE VARIOUS SERVICES AREAS; AND AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT THE OVERALL TARGET DATE FOR COUNTY SERVICE MIGHT BE. THE DATES SHOWN ARE WHAT THEY CONSIDER TO BE REALISTIC. HE THEN WENT ON TO ADDRESS THE SPECIFIC AREAS. MR. ROBBINS DISCUSSED THE AREA REFERRED TO AS THE GIFFORD AREA; EXPLAINING THAT AT SUCH TIME AS THIS SERVICE AREA REQUIRES MORE THAN A 748,000 GALLON ALLOCATION, IT THEN WILL BE TIME FOR THE COUNTY TO SERVE THAT AREA. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE GIFFORD SYSTEM PRESENTLY IN EXISTENCE IS QUITE SMALL IN COMPARISON TO THE OVERALL GIFFORD AREA. MR. ROBBINS CONTINUED THAT THEY BELIEVE A NORTH COUNTY WATER PLANT WILL BE REQUIRED. HE NOTED THAT A REPORT WAS DONE BY GERAGHTY & MILLER ON HOBART WELLFIELDS AND THERE HAS BEEN SOME PRIOR DISCUSSION ABOUT A NORTH COUNTY PLANT TO SERVICE THE GIFFORD AREA AND THE AREA NORTH OF IT EAST OF LATERAL- A. THE EARLIEST THEY COULD SEE THIS HAPPENING LOGISTICALLY WOULD BE 1990. ANOTHER OPTION TO SERVICE THIS AREA WOULD BE TO UTILIZE WATER SUPPLIED FROM THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM, CIRCUMVENTING THE CITY OF VERO BEACH TO THE WEST AND CONTINUING UP THE AIRPORT PROPERTY TO THE GIFFORD AREA, WHICH WOULD NOT BE THE BEST WAY FROM AN ENGINEERING STANDPOINT. MR. ROBBINS COMMENTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THEIR WORK AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN ANTICIPATES THAT SOMETIME THERE WILL BE COUNTY SERVICE NORTH OF THE GIFFORD AREA, BUT THE EARLIEST WOULD BE 1990. COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT WE HAVE TO MAKE A COMMITMENT THAT WE WILL BE IN BUSINESS, BUT FELT THESE DATES ARE ON THE OUTSIDE OF WHAT WE CONSIDER POSSIBLE. MAY 2 11980 -69- A3 Px 57 s. _ Box 43 PAcE 572 MR. ROBBINS DISPLAYED MAPS SHOWING THE AREAS BEING DISCUSSED AND AGREED THAT THE TARGET DATE OF 1990 IS ONLY A PLANNING DATE. HE NOTED WHEN THE TIME COMES TO SERVICE THE ENTIRE GIFFORD AREA, THERE WILL NOT BE ENOUGH WATER ALLOCATION AVAILABLE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT IT WOULD BE VERY EXPENSIVE TO SERVICE ALL THE WAY OUT TO LATERAL A WITH THE LOW DENSITIES PROPOSED FOR THAT AREA. MR. ROBBINS AGREED AND BELIEVED WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IS A WATER PLANT TO SERVE THE MAIN AREA, AND AS IT DEVELOPS IT COULD BE PUSHED OUT TO THE WEST OR SOME TO THE NORTH; FROM AN ENGINEERING STANDPOINT, HOWEVER, IT WOULD BE BETTER TO SERVICE THE AREA FROM THE NORTH RATHER THAN THE SOUTH. ATTORNEY COLLINS CONCURRED THAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT A PLANT TO SERVE THAT GENERAL AREA - NOT NECESSARILY THE ENTIRE AREA. HE NOTED THAT PART OF THE AGREEMENT IS THAT THE COUNTY WILL EVENTUALLY TAKE OVER THE HOSPITAL AREA,AND ONLY WHEN THEY CAN SERVE WATER, WILL THEY SERVE SEWER. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT IF WE ARE TO PROJECT THAT FAR IN ADVANCE, WE MUST ALSO CONSIDER THE EXTREME NORTH COUNTY AREA INCLUDING THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THIS SCHEDULE WAS PRIMARILY PUT TOGETHER TO PROJECT WHEN WE WILL PICK UP THE LOAD OF THAT MUCH WATER. MR. ROBBINS AGREED AND STATED THAT THEY HAVEN'T GIVEN A GREAT DEAL OF DETAILED THOUGHT AS TO WHAT AREAS SHOULD BE SERVICED - JUST THAT IT SEEMS THAT IT SHOULD BE FROM THE NORTH RATHER THAN THE SOUTH. WITH REGARD TO SQUARED OFF AREA N0. 2 - THE COUNTY MUST BE IN A POSITION TO SERVICE WITH WATER AND WITH SEWER BEFORE ACTUALLY TAKING THAT OVER AS A PERMANENT SERVICE AREA. THE SEWER WOULD COME UNDER THE PHASE 1 OF THE 201 PLAN. MR. ROBBINS STATED THAT THEY HAVE GIVEN CONSIDERABLE THOUGHT TO A REALISTIC DATE FOR IMPROVEMENTS UNDER PHASE 1 OF THE 201 PLAN. THE CURRENT DOCUMENT ENVISIONED OPERATION OF THE COUNTY PLANT BY 1983, BUT THIS SCHEDULE WAS PREPARED QUITE SOME TIME AGO AND THEY NOW FEEL IT IS PREMATURE. WITH THE FUNDING -7� AVAILABILITY BEING QUESTIONED AND THE VARIOUS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS THAT MUST BE RESOLVED IN THE MEANTIME, THEY FEEL A MORE REALISTIC IMPLEMENTATION DATE FOR SEWER SERVICE UNDER PHASE 1 OF THE 201 PLAN WOULD BE 1986. THE OTHER CRITERIA WOULD BE WATER SERVICE TO THIS PARTICULAR AREA: THEY ARE LOOKING AT PHASE 1 OF THE SOUTH WATER DISTRICT TAXING UNIT, WHICH THEY BELIEVED COULD BE IMPLEMENTED IN 19821 AND ALTHOUGH THERE ARE RESERVE CONNECTIONS AVAILABLE IN THE TREATMENT PLANT, THEY BELIEVE IT WOULD BE 1990_ BEFORE YOU COULD EXTEND TO THIS AREA. SQUARED OFF AREA N0. 3 IS TO THE SOUTH SIDE OF 17TH STREET AND WILL REMAIN PERMANENTLY ON CITY WATER AND SEWER AND IS NOT REFERRED TO IN THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SQUARED OFF AREA N0. 2 IS THE AREA AROUND THE NORTH OF THE CITY LIMITS AND SOUTH OF THE HOSPITAL AREA. WATER AND SEWER MUST BOTH BE PROVIDED, AND IN ORDER FOR THE COUNTY TO SERVE THIS AREA, IT APPEARS THE BEST THING WOULD BE TO PROVIDE AN EXTENSION FROM THE GIFFORD SERVICE AREA, HERE AGAIN THEY REFER TO A NORTH COUNTY WATER PLANT AND A TARGET DATE OF 19901 AND SEWER SERVICE FROM PHASE 1 OF THE 201 PLAN, OR 1986. MR. ROBBINS NEXT DISCUSSED SPECIFIED COMMERCIAL OR INSTITUTIONAL CUSTOMERS, I.E., CUSTOMERS INTERSPERSED ALONG U.S. HIGHWAY 1 -.00EANSIDE MOTORS, WENDY'S, AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, ETC. TO SERVICE THESE, -THERE ARE THREE CON- TROLLING DATES RELATING TO THE NORTH COUNTY WATER PLANT, THE SOUTH. COUNTY WATER PLANT, PHASE 1, AND PHASE 1 OF THE 201, WITH AN ULTIMATE DATE OF 1990. MR. ROBBINS THEN REVIEWED THE ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION DATES FOR SEWER SERVICE AS SET OUT IN THE SCHEDULE, NOTING THAT ON THE U.S. 1 CORRIDOR, WATER SERVICE COULD BE PROVIDED IMMEDIATELY AND TIED INTO THE 600,000 GALLON ALLOCATION WITH ULTIMATE REVERSION TO THE BEACH AREA. COMMISSIONER LYONS BELIEVED IT IS IMPORTANT TO COME TO SOME AGREEMENT ON THIS SCHEDULE IN ORDER TO KEEP THE AGREEMENT NEGO- TIATIONS MOVING, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF WE SHOULD OFFICIALLY ADOPT THIS SCHEDULE. ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT FEEL THAT HE AND MR. ROBBINS WERE SPECIFICALLY ASKING, THAT THE BOARD DO THAT TODAY, BUT MAINLY WISHED MAY 21.1980 -71- � 4 Pct MAY 2x.1980 BOox 43. nay 74 TO KNOW THE BOARDS GENERAL CONSENSUS AS TO THE REASONABLENESS OF THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE DATES PRESENTED SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO THE FINANCIAL ABILITY OF THE COUNTY TO PROVIDE THE FACILITIES. IF EPA FUNDING IS NOT AVAILABLE, HE DID NOT FEEL WE COULD BE HELD TO THE SCHEDULE, BUT WE WILL BE MAKING.EVERY EFFORT TO OBTAIN THE FUNDING IN THE TIMEFRAMES SET FORTH. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE NOW. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE DATED MAY IS. 19801 AND AS PRESENTED BY ,JOHN ROBBINS AND AUTHORIZED USE OF THESE DATES IN CONTINUING DISCUSSION WITH THE MUNICIPALITIES. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND CONSULTING ENGINEER JAMES BEINDORF WENT UP TO THE PRESENT GIFFORD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND LOOKED OVER THE GENERAL AREA FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINDING POSSIBLE ALTERNATE LOCATIONS FOR THE PLANT. HE STATED THAT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LINDSEY ROAD, THERE IS A 40 ACRE TRACT, WHICH THEY FEEL MIGHT BE A VERY ACCEPTABLE AND FEASIBLE ALTERNATE IN LIEU OF THE 20 ACRE SITE ON KINGS HIGHWAY. ENGINEER BEINDORF PRESENTED A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PRESENT SITE AND THE ALTERNATE SITE, AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE NEW LOCATION IS IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF WHERE WE WOULD COME OUT OF THE LIFT STATION. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT WE PRESENTLY HAVE EASE- MENTS WHICH GO DIRECTLY TO THE 40 ACRE SITE, AND THIS SITE WOULD ELIMINATE THE NECESSITY OF RUNNING THE LINE ALL THE WAY WEST TO THE PRESENT SITE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THE BOARD WOULD LIKE TO KNOW (1) APPROXIMATELY WHAT IT WOULD COST TO ACQUIRE THE ALTERNATE SITE; (2) WHAT IT WOULD COST TO RUN THE LINES TO THE ALTERNATE SITE; (3) WHAT IT IS GOING TO COST TO RUN THE LINES FROM THE LIFT STATION TO THE CURRENT SITE; AND (4) -APPROXIMATELY WHAT WE COULD GET OUT OF THE LAND WHERE THE CURRENT SITE IS. ENGINEER BEINDORF COMMENTED THAT AN APPRAISAL OF BOTH SITES WILL BE NEEDED. HE FELT THE SAVINGS WILL BE FAIRLY EASY TO COMPUTE SINCE THEY HAVE A LUMP SUM FIGURE ON THE LINES, AND THE NEW LOCATION WOULD CUT OUT ABOUT 80% OF IT. HE DID NOT KNOW WHAT IT WOULD COST TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY OR WHETHER THERE WOULD BE ADDITIONAL COSTS INVOLVED IN USING THE 4O ACRE SITE AS OPPOSED TO THE ONE ON KING'S HIGHWAY3BUT FELT THEY COULD SUPPLY THE DESIRED INFORMATION BY THE NEXT MEETING, COMMISSIONER LYONS WAS OF THE OPINION THAT, BECAUSE OF THE PUBLIC OPINION THAT HAS BEEN STIRRED UP, WE WOULD BE BETTER OFF NOT TO LOCATE THE PLANT AT THE PRESENT SITE ON KINGS HIGHWAY. HE NOTED THAT, IN ADDITION, A SAVING SHOULD RESULT FROM.BEING CLOSER TO THE LIFT STATIONfAND IT SEEMS THAT WE CAN GET ADDITIONAL ACREAGE AT THE ALTERNATE SITE. ENGINEER BEINDORF AGREED THAT WE WOULD BE LOOKING AT A 4O ACRE TRACT AS OPPOSED TO A 20 ACRE SITE, AND HE FELT THE ALTERNATE SITE WOULD BE MORE RECEPTIVE TO RECEIVING SEWAGE AS TO PERCOLATION. THE ADMINISTRATOR FELT THERE WOULD BE AT LEAST A MILE LESS OF FORCE MAIN REQUIRED WITH THE ALTERNATE LOCATION. HE STATED THAT THEY WISHED TO PRESENT THIS TO THE BOARD AND THEN GET AUTHORITY TO APPROACH THE OWNER AND GET APPRAISALS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT WE NEED TO KNOW THE COSTS RELATIVE TO THE ONE SITE AS OPPOSED TO THE OTHER FIRST. COMMISSIONER LYONS EXPRESSED INTEREST IN KNOWING HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST TO PUMP THROUGH A MILE OF TRANSMISSION LINE, AND ENGINEER BEINDORF NOTED THAT IT WOULD REQUIRE LESS POWER TO PUMP A LESSER DISTANCE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT LAND IN THIS COUNTY IS STILL A RELATIVELY CHEAP COMMODITY,AND HE BELIEVED WE SHOULD LOOK AT IT IN TERMS OF FUTURE NEEDS AND GET A LARGER AMOUNT NOW. HE ASKED IF IT WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO THE BOARD TO DESIGNATE THE LOCATIONS AS ALTERNATE 1 AND ALTERNATE 2 AND GET THE RELATED COSTS. THE BOARD AGREED. -73- , mo 43. -p Ai ct,5`ll5 MAY 211980 Boo, 43 CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DIRECTED THE ENGINEER TO GET PRICES AND COSTS AND BRING THE INFORMATION BACK TO THE BOARD. ENGINEER BEINDORF REPORTED ON MEETING WITH MR. ANSIN IN REGARD TO OBTAINING A PORTION OF HIS ACREAGE AS A SITE FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT. HE INFORMED THE BOARD. THAT THEY DISCUSSED ACREAGE RUNNING THROUGH FROM OSLO ROAD TO REBEL ROAD, AND MR. ANSIN WONDERED WHY AN AREA OF THAT SIZE WAS NEEDED. IT WAS EXPLAINED TO HIM THAT THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF LOCATING A FIRE STATION THERE ALSO AND POSSIBLY HAVING OTHER MUNICIPAL USES, AND MR. ANSIN SEEMED TO BE VERY RECEPTIVE TO THE WHOLE PROGRAM. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT MR. ANSIN STILL NEEDS A CONDEMNA- TION OR A POSITIVE THREAT OF ONE, AND ATTORNEY COLLI'NS AGREED. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD ASSURED MR, ANSIN THAT THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE WOULD BE FENCED AND BUFFERED. ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT HE AND THE ENGINEERS ARE RECOMMENDING THE BOARD PURCHASE A SITE WHICH IS EXPANDED OVER TO REBEL ROAD BECAUSE THEY FELT THE BENEFITS OF GOING FROM ROAD TO ROAD WOULD BE WORTH THE EXTRA COST. HE STATED THAT THE PROPERTY WAS APPRAISED BY MR. WILKES AT $5,000 AN ACRE, AND IT INCLUDES COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ALONG OSLO ROAD, AS SET OUT IN THE LETTER FROM FLOYD WILKES DATED MAY 6, 1980. COPY OF THE APPRAISAL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK. -74� i Registered Real Estate Broker a] Vero ls!rs Sold Office RFALTOR 93 Royal Palm Blvd. p, (/. Box 1506 May 6, 1980 Phone (305) 562.4098 {'eru Brorh. Vhmdo 32960 Mr. George G. Collins, Attorney Board Of County Commissioners Indian River County, Florida 32960. Dear Mr, Collins: In accordance with your request, I have prepared an appraisal of an unimproved tract of land contii 40 acres and naslocated with frontage on Oslo Road and being legally All of Tract 9, less the Bast 15 acres thereof and the West 10 acres of Tract 16 and the North 5 acres of the East 8.48 acres of the West 18.48 acres of Tract 16, all in Section 239 Township 33 South, Range 39 East, according to the last general plat of lands of Indian River Farms Company, as recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Ste Lucie County, Florida, and recorded in plat Book 2, page 25, now being located in Indian River County, Florida, less and excepting all right of ways for Oslo Road and drainage canals. The subject property is an unimproved wooded tract of -land with some 400 feet of frontage on Oslo Road in about the 1800 Block and extends one-half mile north to Rebel Road. The front 600 feet is zoned C-1 Commercial with the remaining portion zoned residential. Based on a personal inspection of the subject land and review of recent land sales in the area, it is my opinion that the subject 40 acres warrant a fair market value of $5,000 per acre for a total value of: 3 L_ " TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000.00) Respectfully submitted, Floyd Wilkes EpX r=:.xP�i 77 sf MAY 2119 80 43 pAcf 578 THE ATTORNEY CONTINUED THAT MR. ANSIN GAVE THE IMPRESSION THAT HE HAD SOME APPRAISAL FIGURES THAT WERE HIGHER, BUT UNDER THREAT OF CONDEMNA- TION, HE WAS WILLING TO SELL AT $5,000 AN ACRE. HE STATED THAT THEY ARE LOOKING FOR A DECISION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE BOARD IS WILLING TO PURCHASE ALL THE WAY TO REBEL ROAD. ENGINEER BEINDORF NOTED THAT THIS WOULD AMOUNT TO ABOUT 42 ACRES, AND MR. ANSIN HAS INDICATED HE IS WILLING TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY BOTH ON THE LOCATION AND THE PRICE. COMMISSIONER LOY FELT THAT GOING BACK TO REBEL ROAD IS TO THE COUNTY'S ADVANTAGE AND THAT WE SHOULD GO AHEAD AND PURCHASE ALL 42 ACRES. WILLIAM KOOLAGE, INTERESTED CITIZEN, ASKED IF THE COUNTY - OWNED LAND WHICH HAS BEEN PROPOSED FOR A SCHOOL SITE MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR THE TREATMENT PLANT WITHOUT HAVING TO PURCHASE MORE LAND, AND THE ENGINEER INFORMED HIM THAT THAT SITE IS NOT BIG ENOUGH FOR THE PURPOSE AND IN ADDITION, THERE ARE HOUSES BUILT ALL AROUND IT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 80-48 AUTHORIZING THE ATTORNEY TO PROCEED WITH THE NECESSARY STEPS FOR PROCURING FROM THE ANSINS THE PROPERTY AMOUNTING TO APPROXIMATELY 42 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN OSLO AND REBEL ROADS, AS SET OUT IN LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF THE SAID 42 ACRES OWNED BY THE ANSINS FOR A LOCATION FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM. RESOLUTION NO. 80-48 WHEREAS, pursuant to Loan Funds in the amount of $5,825,900 and Grant Funds in the amount of $796,900.00 committed by Farmers Home Administration to Indian River County for the purpose of developing the South County Water System, the Board of County Commissioners deems it necessary to acquire a site location for well fields and plant site; and WHEREAS, the location on Oslo Road near 20th Avenue is deemed, based on engineering reports, to be the appropriate location of the well fields and plant site; and WHEREAS, appropriate governmental officials have located the site described as follows for acquisition: and All of Tract 9 less the East 15 acres thereof and the West 10 acres of Tract 16 and the North 5 acres of the East 8.48 acres of the West 18.48 acres of Tract 16, all in Section 23, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, according to the last general plat of lands of Indian River Farms Company as recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Florida, and recorded in Plat Book 2, page 25, now being located in Indian River County, Florida, less and excepting all rights of way for Oslo Road and drainage canals; WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida declares the need to acquire the above described site is in the public interest and for the public welfare of the County and that the providing of a South County Water System is an appropriate governmental public purpose; and WHEREAS, condemnation of the proposed site pursuant to Florida law is deemed necessary and appropriate to satisfy the need of providing a location for the South County Water System; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; FLORIDA, that appropriate 4ci MAY 2.11980 ;eabK �f57�9 MAY 21190 BooK 43 pxi 580 County officials are directed, on behalf of the County, to condemn the above described site for the purpose of acquiring necessary lands for the South County Water System; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board declare that it is necessary to condemn the above described site and that said condemnation is for a proper public purpose. Said Resolution will become effective as of the 21st day of May, 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Alma Lee Loy, Vice Chain Attest: Clerk ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT COORDINATOR THOMAS ORIGINALLY WAS CONSIDERING BORROWING ON A BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE FOR THE AMOUNT OF THE PURCHASE PLUS THE HYDROLOGY EXPENSES, BUT HE FELT THAT MR. THOMAS NOW WILL COME BACK WITH ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE, SUGGESTING THAT THE BOARD HAVE THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER SERVICE FUND BORROW FROM REVENUE SHARING TEMPORARILY TO -BE PAID BACK FROM THE BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES WHEN SOLD. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, TO HAVE THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER SERVICE FUND BORROW FROM REVENUE SHARING AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO COVER THE LAND PURCHASE AND HYDROLOGY EXPENSES; THIS AMOUNT TO BE REPAID TO REVENUE SHARING FROM THE BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES WHEN SOLD. COMMISSIONER WODTKE BROUGHT UP THE QUESTION OF INTEREST RATES, I.E., WHETHER THIS METHOD WOULD PAY BACK INTO THE REVENUE SHARING ACCOUNT THE EQUAL AMOUNT OF INTEREST THAT THAT ACCOUNT WOULD EARN SHOULD WE HAVE INVESTED THOSE FUNDS. HE FELT THAT IT SHOULD. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON CONFIRMED THAT WE DO EARN INTEREST ON THESE FUNDS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT QUESTIONED WHETHER THE FACT THAT THERE IS INTEREST INVOLVED WOULD JEOPARDIZE IN ANY WAY OUR USING FMHA MONEY FOR THE PURCHASE AT A LATER DATE. -- COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT POSSIBLY WE OUGHT TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THE POSSIBILITY OF REPAYING THE LOST INTEREST OUT OF THE WATER DISTRICT AND HAVE THE FINANCE DIRECTOR RESEARCH THE MATTER. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM IF WE CAN UTILIZE THE REVENUE SHARING ON A LOAN BASIS TO THIS ENTERPRISE ACCOUNT. HE WAS JUST CONCERNED ABOUT THE INTEREST SITUATION. ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT IN THE INTERIM FROM THE TEST WELL PROGRAM, THE SALE OF THE BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES WILL PROCEED AND THE REFUNDING WILL OCCUR; S0, HE DID NOT FEEL WE ARE TALKING ABOUT BORROWING FOR A VERY LONG PERIOD OF TIME. DISCUSSION CONTINUED, AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CALLED FOR THE QUESTION, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IF WE CAN PAY INTEREST, WE WILL PAY A REASONABLE AMOUNT. -79- MAY 2.11980 660K °4� rp,- -7 MAY 2 11980 80��( 41*i5.8Z THE MOTION WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SPECIFIC APPROVAL TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY AT THE APPRAISED VALUE OF $5,000 AN ACRE, CLOSE THE TRANSACTION,AND HAVE THE PARTIES SIGN THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN -RESOLUTION 80-48 AT $5,000 PER ACRE, TO CLOSE THE TRANSACTION, AND TO HAVE THE PARTIES THERETO SIGN THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. ENGINEER RALPH ENG REPORTED THAT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FOREGOING, THEY PRESENTED AT THE MEETING OF APRIL 23RD CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FROM GERAGHTY & MILLER FOR THE TEST WELL PROGRAM, WHICH WERE APPROVED AT THAT TIME, BUT THEY DEFERRED PROCEEDING WITH THE BIDDING UNTIL THEY KNEW APPROXIMATELY THE DATE THE CONTRACTOR COULD GO ON THE LAND TO CONSTRUCT THE WELLS. THEY NOW NEED TO SET A DATE FOR BIDDING ON THE TEST WELLS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ENGINEERS TO PROCEED WITH THE BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TEST WELL PROGRAM. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT EACH OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAS RECEIVED A LETTER FROM ATTORNEY O'HAIRE IN REGARD TO HARBOR ISLAND CLUB TYING INTO THE PEBBLE BAY SYSTEM, AND HE WOULD HOPE THAT BEFORE THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING THE ENGINEERS CAN SUPPLY THE BOARD WITH AN ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS INVOLVED SO THAT THE BOARD WILL HAVE THE INFORMATION NEEDED TO REACH A DECISION. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR UNIT TWO OF FOREST PARK SUBDIVISION AT VISTA ROYALE. ATTORNEY COLLINS REVIEWED THE PLAT AND STATED THAT THE DEDICATIONS ARE IN ORDER; ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS CONFIRMED THAT INSPECTIONS WERE MADE, ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE IN, AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGREES THAT EVERYTHING IS IN CONFORMANCE. .7. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL TO FOREST PARK SUBDIVISION, UNIT 2 (VISTA ROYALE). SENIOR PLANNER DAVID MARSH GAVE A PROGRESS REPORT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF WABASSO BEACH PARK. HE STATED THAT HE DID TALK WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, THE LEAD AGENCY ON THE GRANT APPLICATION, AND WAS NOTIFIED THAT OFFICIAL APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANTED. MR. MARSH THEN WENT ON TO REVIEW THE PROGRAM SCHEDULE THAT HAS BEEN WORKED UP WITH THE ADMINISTRATOR, THE ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT, AND THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS. HE ANTICIPATED THAT IN .JUNE THEY WILL BE DOING SOIL ANALYSIS, FILLING, DRESSING AND STABILIZING THE BLUFF LINE, PLACING FENCING POLES, WHETHER PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY, SO TRAFFIC DOES NOT GET ONTO THE BLUFF LINE AND ALSO ARE SCHEDULING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURES WHICH CANNOT BE REHABILITATED AND RENOVATING THOSE THAT CAN BE UTILIZED. MR. MARSH STATED THAT THE ROAD & BRIDGE SUPERVISOR, GENE HAMILTON, FELT THIS WAS A REALISTIC SCHEDULE AND COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED IN THE NEXT FOUR TO FIVE WEEKS, IF THE PROJECT WERE GIVEN PRIORITY BY THE COUNTY COMMISSION. JUNE THROUGH JULY, THEY WILL BE COMPLETING DETAILS ON THE VARIOUS SUBSTANTIAL STRUCTURES, SUCH AS THE BOARDWALK AND RELIEF FACILITIES, MAKING THE NECESSARY PERMIT APPLICATIONS, PREPARING SPECIFICATIONS, -AND BEGINNING THE PROCESS FOR INITIATING BIDDING. .JULY THROUGH SEPTEMBER, THEY WOULD ANTICIPATE LETTING CONTRACTS AND CONSTRUCTING THE BOARDWALK, GAZEBO, RELIEF STATIONS AND PERHAPS TWO CROSSOVERS. SEPTEMBER THROUGH OCTOBER, THEY WOULD BRING THE COUNTY CREWS BACK IN AND DO THE FINAL WORK ON DRESSING OUT - LANDSCAPING, PAVING, ETC. THEY ARE HOPING FOR COMPLETION BY NOVEMBER, IF GIVEN PRIORITY., MR. MARSH NOTED THAT HE NEEDED TO DISCUSS FOUR THINGS IN DETAIL: (1) CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL OF THE PROGRAM SCHEDULE; (2) DIRECTION AS TO WHAT ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT THE BOARD WISHES TO GO INTO THE BIDDING PROCESS; (3) AUTHORIZATION FOR ROAD & BRIDGE TO PROCEED UNDER THIS SCHEDULE ON A PRIORITY BASIS WITH PRIMARILY THE BLUFF LINE WORK; AND MAY 211980 SAY 2 11980 BOOK 4'r� � pAcfW (4) AUTHORIZATION TO SPEND ABOUT $4,000 FOR SEEDLINGS AND MATERIAL NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE BLUFF LINE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THE BOARD NEEDED SOME RECOMMENDATION ON WHAT ITEMS SHOULD BE BID. MR. MARSH NOTED THAT HE HAS DISCUSSED THIS. WITH ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS, AND THEY BELIEVE IT IS WITHIN THE CAPABILITY OF THE COUNTY FORCES TO DO A LOT OF THIS WORK. THE PROBLEM THEY HAVE IS THE JULY VACATION PERIOD AND TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH THIS PROJECT IN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. MR. MARSH STATED THAT IT WAS THE FEELING OF EVERYONE CONCERNED THAT IT WOULD BE ADVISABLE TO GO OUT FOR BIDS ON THE RELIEF STATION, THE GAZEBO, THE BOARDWALK AND PERHAPS EVEN THE ADDITIONAL TWO CROSSOVERS, AND THEY WERE CONSIDERING ADDING AS AN OPTION THE UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED — WATER, SEWER, POWER, ETC. ADMINISTRATOR JENNI.NGS SUGGESTED, BECAUSE OF THE LOAD BEING IMPOSED ON THE ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT, GOING TO BID BUT DOING IT IN ALTERNATES SO THAT ANY BID CAN BE ACCEPTED OR REJECTED WITHOUT AFFECTING THE OTHER. IN THIS WAY, IF SOME OF THE BIDS PROVE TO BE UNSATISFACTORY, WE CAN MOVE AHEAD WITH THE COUNTY FORCES. COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT AS. MUCH AS HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS COMPLETED BY NOVEMBER, HE WOULD BE A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT THE COST INVOLVED IN PUTTING IT OUT TO BID VERSUS COUNTY CREWS DOING IT AT SOME OTHER TIME. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED ABOUT THE PROBLEM OF CONSTRUCTION , BEING CARRIED ON IN THE PARK IN THE SUMMERTIME WHEN THE PUBLIC IS USING IT DAILY. COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THE SEEDING AND STABILIZATION OF THE BLUFF LINE TO KEEP THAT AREA FROM ERODING IS MOST IMPORTANT AND MUST BE DONE IMMEDIATELY. SHE SHARED EVERYONE'S CONCERN ABOUT INTERFERING WITH THE PUBLIC S ENJOYMENT OF THE BEACH, BUT FELT WITH THE SCHEDULE THAT HAS BEEN OUTLINED AND THE VACATIONS OF THE ROAD & BRIDGE PEOPLE THROUGHOUT JULY, THAT WE WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH THE PUBLIC TOO MUCH. COMMISSIONER LOY FELT WE SHOULD CARRY OUT THE EARLY PART OF THE SCHEDULE AND IN THE MEANTIME BID SOME OF THE ITEMS BECAUSE WE CANNOT AFFORD TO PUT OUR WORK CREWS OUT THERE FOR THREE SOLID WEEKS. COMMISSIONER DEESON REITERATED THAT HE BELIEVED WE COULD GET A LOT MORE FOR A LOT LESS IF COUNTY CREWS COULD DO THE WORK, BUT STATED THAT HE WAS NOT OPPOSED TO GETTING BIDS. SENIOR PLANNER MARSH COMMENTED THAT THERE ARE TWO COUNTY CARPENTERS WHO COULD WORK ON THIS, BUT THEY ARE CURRENTLY WORKING ON THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND ON REPAIR OF BRIDGES. HE NOTED THAT THEY DID PAD THEIR ESTIMATES TO ALLOW FOR INFLATION AS BEST THEY COULD, AND HE FELT THEY WENT WITH PRETTY HIGH FIGURES. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF WE NEED TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS OR WHETHER WE COULD JUST OBTAIN PROPOSALS, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT PROJECTS UNDER DISCUSSION INVOLVE $30,000 TO $40,000. IT WAS AGREED THAT WE SHOULD GO TO BID. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GAVE CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL OF THE TIME SCHEDULE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF WABASSO BEACH PARK AS OUTLINED BY SENIOR PLANNER MARSH; AUTHORIZED ADVERTISING FOR BIDS ON THE RELIEF STATION, GAZEBO, BOARDWALK, TWO CROSSOVERS AND THE NECESSARY UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION; AUTHORIZED THE ROAD & BRIDGE DEPARTMENT TO PROCEED UNDER THE ABOVE SCHEDULE ON A PRIORITY BASIS WITH PRIMARILY THE BLUFF LINE WORK; AND AUTHORIZED THE SPENDING OF APPROXIMATELY $4,000 FOR SEEDLINGS AND MATERIALS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE BLUFF LINE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT AFTER THE BOARD'S JOINT MEETING WITH THE ZONING BOARD LAST WEEK, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUESTED THAT THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TWO BOARDS GET TOGETHER AND GIVE THEM SOME IDEA OF WHICH DIRECTION THEY SHOULD PROCEED WITH DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. HE CONTINUED THAT PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER HAS PREPARED A MEMO WHICH DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB OF SETTING OUT WHAT WAS DISCUSSED AT THAT MEETING AND IF WE ELECT TO PROCEED ON THE BASIS SET OUT IN HIS MEMO, IT WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION TOMORROW, SAID MEMO IS AS FOLLOWS: MAY 211980 MAY 2 11980 BQ It 43 WE 5% May 20, 1980 MEMO TO: W. W. Siebert, Jr., Chairman Board of County Commissioners FROM: David M. Rever, Director Planning and Zoning Department �. SUBJECT: Development of County Comprehensive Plan I think you will agree that as a result of our meeting earlier this afternoon with Richard Bird, Joe Collins, Jack Jennings and ourselves, some very positive understanding and direction was gained with regard to the content and scope of the Comprehensive Plan as well as the implemen- tation instruments to be utilized. I personally feel that it was one of the most constructive meetings to date concerning the subject. In keeping with the spirit of this meeting, `a -synopsis of the material covered is presented here for the benefit and approval of the County Commissioners and members of the Planning and Zoning Commission. First,'it was agreed that in order to produce the Plan and associated documents of implementation within the time frame proposed that two forms of help would be desirable. 1) That another staff person be sought as a permanent addition to the Planning staff, adding more capability to work on the Plan documents while maintaining the present ability to handle ongoing departmental responsibilities. 2) That a capable consultant be hired to assist the department in producing the planning elements and primarily in revising and reviewing all documents for implementation so as to be consis- tent with the Plan elements. This is most necessary in order to meet the proposed deadline for adoption of the entire package. Secondly, the Comprehensive Plan for the County would address the various functions in terms of density land use management in order to establish a better long term management perspective for County development. This would be accomplished through the use of existing documents which would be modified or revised as needed to best meet policies of the planning document. This would include a Future Land Use Map to be contained in the appropriate section of the County Plan, as well as ordinancesfor Zoning, Site Plans, Subdivisions, Mining and others presently used by the County to manage and enhance the quality of land use. Primary among the modifications and addi- tions to the ordinances would be one which would allow and manage development through the concept known as Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). Under a P.U.D. concept, a proposal would be required to meet specific standards; while being allowed some degree of flexibility in development design and housing types employed. The following is a partial list of considerationswhich should be considered for incorporation into this portion of the Zoning Ordinance. 1) Should be handled as a zone change making conditions agreed to applicable to all future owners and major modification subject to entire process of review and approval. 2) There should be a minimum acreage of contiguous land required, in order to be considered for P.U.D. 3) The uses proposed would maintain the integrity of the zone in which P.U.D. was granted. Thus the majority of the development in the P.U.D. would be of a type or types allowed in the existing zone. 4) A requirement should be incorporated which would bring about the construction of units in proportion to the approved mix and number of types. The project could be phased in such a manor to accomplish this. 5) Overall density would be controlled by the land use designation and implemented through zoning. However, a certain degree of development intensification would be permitted to achieve the best land use, provide protection to sensitive areas, or allow for additional open or public space; but this would not exceed a factor greater than two times the normal density allowed, figured on a per acre basis. 6) The use of deed restrictionswould be called for to insure the integrity of using the P.U.D. concept in the first place. These restrictions would be recorded with the zone change approval in order to carry the intent of the development with the land. The advantages of allowing P.U.D. development are varied, and emphasis can be paced on particular community needs and desires. However, there are several basic points�whic clearly standout.whic accure to the County, the developer and to the public at large. 1) Cost savings can be achieved for the County as well as the developer. 2) Environmental protection of lands and waters through designation of specific areas within the development. 3) A process which can easily be adapted and incorporated in our present system of operation, as well as the ability to understand this tool, its advantages and limitations for users, future residents and the public. 4) Use of this process is a positive step in proceeding toward the overall aims of the goals and policies to be stated in the Com- prehensive Plan. It is my feeling that the development of a meaningful and usable planning document along with the appropriate implementation tools, within the present time frame desired, can be best met by proceeding in terms of the material presented here. I would also point out that items 1, 2 and 3, immediately preceding this paragraph regarding P.U.D., can also be applied to the overall planning effort in Indian River County. The procedure stated here points in the right direction, utilizing good planning techniques and opens the way for building upon this solid base to achieve the most effective management of County growth. DMR: j t cc: Members Planning & Zoning Commission PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER REVIEWED HIS MEMO AND STATED THAT BASICALLY THE FIRST PART DEALS WITH THE QUESTION OF WHAT KIND OF ASSISTANCE WOULD BE NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE PLAN AND ALL THE NECESSARY IMPLEMENTATION TO MAKE IT A WORKABLE ENTITY WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME DESIRED. HE CONTINUED THAT WITH HIS DEPARTMENTS WORKLOAD, WHICH IS CONTINUING TO GROW, HE COULD VERY EASILY USE ANOTHER STAFF MAY 211980- Door 43 PACE 587 I _I goo 43 *E588 PERSON BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO MAINTAIN THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE PUBLIC ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS AS WELL AS TRY TO COMPLETE THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. HE WOULD, THEREFORE, PROPOSE TO ADD A PERMANENT PERSON TO THEIR STAFF TO TAKE UP THE SLACK. MR. REVER CONTINUED THAT HE HAD DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD SOME TIME AGO THE NECESSITY FOR HIRING A CONSULTANT TO COMPLETE THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN WITHIN -THE PROPOSED TIME FRAME. HE NOW FELT THAT NOT ONLY SHOULD THE PLAN`BE COMPLETED AND ADOPTED, BUT THAT THE IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE SHOULD BE ADOPTED AT THE SAME TIME, AND, THEREFORE, IT IS CRITICAL TO GET OUTSIDE HELP WITH SPECIFIC EXPERTISE. HE FELT THAT THE STAFF CAN AND SHOULD CONTINUE TO PRODUCE THE ELEMENTS AND DEVELOP THE PLAN ITSELF BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT TIME TO DEVELOP THE IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCES ALSO AND MAKE THEM COMPATIBLE. MR. REVER'CONTINUED THAT THE SECOND PART OF HIS MEMO DEALS WITH THE SPECIFICS OF THE PLAN, AND IN PARTICULAR THE AREA KNOWN AS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P.U.D.). HE FELT THE PLAN WOULD REFLECT A COUNTYWIDE P.U.D. AND THAT WE WOULD BE TAKING A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION BY UTILIZING A DENSITY CONTROL, WHICH'POSSIBLY COULD BE DONE UNDER EXISTING ORDINANCES RATHER THAN MAKE IT A GIANT STEP, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT THEY STARTED WITH THE CONCEPT MR. REVER PROPOSED AND DENSITY IS GOING TO BE CONTROLLED RATHER THAN LAND USE; HOWEVER, LAND USE IS STILL IMPORTANT, AND HE FELT IN WORKING WITH THIS WE SHOULD USE THE TOOLS WITH WHICH WE ALL ARE MOST FAMILIAR. MR. REVER BELIEVED THAT THE KEY IS TO REVISE AND MODIFY THE EXISTING ORDINANCES SO THEY WILL BE EFFECTIVE AS TO DENSITY MANAGEMENT AND THE TACK THEY TAKE WILL BE TO REVISE THE PRIMARY TOOLS AS THE PLAN IS DEVELOPED SO -THAT EVERYTHING DOVETAILS WHEN THE PLAN IS COMPLETED, MR. REVER THEN WENT ON TO DISCUSS THE SIX ITEMS LISTED IN HIS MEMO WHICH HE FELT ARE BASIC TO THE P.U.D. CONCEPT. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HIS CONCEPT OF P.U.D. INCLUDED OTHER USES BESIDES, FOR EXAMPLE, SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. HE ASKED IF MR. REVER IS CONTEMPLATING THEY MIGHT PUT IN STORES, ETC. —86— MR. REVER FELT THAT COULD BE A POSSIBILITY AND THERE COULD ALSO BE SOME MULTIFAMILY. HOWEVER, THE MAJORITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD REFLECT THE FLAVOR OF THE SURROUNDING ZONING. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CONFIRMED THAT IF YOU HAD R—IA AND ALLOWED P.U.D., YOU MIGHT GET SOME MULTI -FAMILY, BUT THE MAJORITY STILL WOULD ADHERE TO THE SINGLE FAMIL ;AND AROUND THE PERIPHERY, YOU WOULD CERTAINLY CONFORM TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THIS IS ALL -RIGHT IN A 100 OR 1,000 ACRE TRACT, BUT WHAT ABOUT A 10 ACRE PIECE? HE NOTED THAT IN SOME PLACES, THEY HAVE MADE P.U.D. SO RESTRICTIVE THAT THEY NEVER USE IT, AND HE FELT A LOT DEPENDED ON HOW YOU CLASSIFY A It COMMON WALL. 11 MR. REVER COMMENTED THAT A FREE STANDING WALL WOULD BE SINGLE FAMILY, AND POINTED OUT THAT THESE ARE ALL DETAILS THAT HAVE TO BE THOROUGHLY DISCUSSED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT WHAT THE PLANNING DIRECTOR IS LOOKING FOR NOW IS MERELY CONCURRENCE WITH THE DIRECTION THEY ARE HEADING. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER CONTINUED TO DISCUSS P.U.D. AND ITS ADVANTAGES AS LISTED IN HIS MEMO. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT ONE MORE.ADVANTAGE, PARTICULARLY WITH THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS ON WATER AND SEWER, IS THAT WE WILL HAVE A TAG ON WHAT THE DENSITY REQUIREMENTS WILL BE AND SO BE ABLE TO KNOW THE POTENTIAL FOR THE AREA. HE COMMENTED THAT WE CAN USE P.U.D. IN SUCH A FASHION THAT IT BECOMES A MANAGEMENT TOOL RATHER THAN A DEVELOPMENT TOOL AND WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME WE HAVE SET FOR OURSELVES, COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE LIKED THE APPROACH PRO- POSED AND THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH CONCURRING WITH THE MEMO AS SUBMITTED AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF PERSON, HE THOUGHT WE HAD ALREADY AUTHORIZED LOOKING FOR CONSULTANTS. MR. REVER AGREED THAT THE BOARD HAD AUTHORIZED HIM TO GO AHEAD AND CHECK OUT CONSULTANTS, AND STATED HE WILL HAVE PROPOSALS FROM FOUR FIRMS BY FRIDAY AND WILL RECOMMEND HIRING ONE OF THEM AT THE MEETING OF .JUNE 4TH. HE EMPHASIZED THAT HE ALSO DOES WANT ANOTHER MAY 2 1 —87— ' , . 't Boa. - : pi' 589 980 MAY 2 11980 Book:. 43- X500 FULL TIME STAFF PERSON AND HAS DONE SOME INQUIRING AND ASKED FOR RESUMES, BUT HAS GOTTEN A VERY POOR RESPONSE FROM ANY WHO FIT THE CRITERIA FOR WHICH THEY ARE LOOKING. HE STATED THAT THE ORIGINAL IDEA WAS TO OBTAIN SOMEONE WHO WOULD BE CAPABLE OF DOING THE DAILY WORK OR WORKING ON THE PLAN, BUT SINCE WE HAVE PEOPLE WORKING ON THE PLAN WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH IT, IT MIGHT BE EASIER JUST TO GET SOMEONE TO TAKE UP THE SLACK IN THE DAILY -LOAD. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED AN ADDITIONAL PLANNING POSITION IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND AUTHORIZED THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT TO WORK WITH THEM IMMEDIATELY TO FIND A PERSON TO FILL THAT POSITiON. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DID NOT FEEL THAT IT WAS NECESSARY TO TAKE OFFICIAL ACTION ON THE SECOND PART OF THE MEMO, BUT JUST TO APPROVE THE CONCEPT OF THE APPROACH. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE APPROVED THE CONCEPT BUT WISHED TO EMPHASIZE THAT THE DETAILS ARE TERRIBLY IMPORTANT. THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AGREED WITH THE CONCEPT OF THE APPROACH TO THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AS PRESENTED IN MR. REVER'S MEMO DATED MAY 20, 1980. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NEXT BROUGHT UP THE WORK SENIOR PLANNER DAVID MARSH IS NOW DOING FOR THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. SENIOR PLANNER MARSH INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS THE WORK ON FELLSMERE'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ABOUT 90% DONE AND SEBASTIAN'S ABOUT 70% DONE. HE STATED THAT HE HAS HAD A PROBLEM DOING THIS ALONG WITH HIS WORKLOAD FOR THE COUNTY, AND DOES NOT SEE HOW HE CAN COMPLETE THE NECESSARY WORK WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT EXPLAINED THAT THE MUNICIPALITIES WERE GIVEN A VERY SMALL GRANT, AND WHEN MR. MARSH FIRST CAME, HE WAS HIRED WITH THAT MONEY AND PROVIDED THOSE SERVICES, BUT WE RAN OUT OF THE GRANT.MONEY. SINCE THAT TIME, THE MUNICIPALITIES WERE WARNED THAT THEY WERE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF HIS TIME AND USING HIM FOR OTHER THINGS. SINCE THAT TIME ALSO, THE COUNTY HAS HIRED MR. MARSH AS A PERMANENT MEMBER OF OUR PLANNING STAFF)AND HE IS BEING PAID OUT OF THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE FUNDS. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THAT THE TIME HAS COME IF THE MUNICIPALITIES WANT MORE SERVICES FROM MR. MARSH, THEY WILL HAVE TO CONTRACT FOR IT. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT DID NOT KNOW THAT MR. MARSH HAS TIME FOR THIS, BUT COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT HE IS THE ONLY ONE FAMILIAR WITH THEIR WORK AND HE DID NOT FEEL WE CAN CUT THEM OFF COMPLETELY. MR. REVER FELT THAT WHEN MR. MARSH WAS HIRED BY THE COUNTY FULL TIME, HE WAS A COUNTY EMPLOYEE AND ANYTHING HE WAS DOING FOR THE MUNICIPALITIES WAS GRATIS. HE CONTINUED THAT WHAT HE PROPOSED IN TALKING WITH THE ADMINISTRATOR WAS TO GET ANOTHER STAFF MEMBER TO RELIEVE MR. MARSH SO HE COULD SPEND A LITTLE MORE TIME DEALING WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE MUNICIPALITIES; HOWEVER, WE ALSO NEED HIM FOR OUR OWN PLAN. HE FELT THAT MR, MARSH WILL BE PRESSURED TO PRODUCE IN TWO DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS AND THAT WE MAY HAVE TO LET THE MUNICIPALITIES DRAG A LITTLE. IF THE MUNICIPALITIES WANT MR, MARSH TO ATTEND THEIR REGULAR MEETINGS, ETC., HE FELT THEY SHOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT WE NEVER INTENDED TO HAVE MR. MARSH DEAL WITH THEIR EVERY DAY WORK. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE.THE ATTORNEY OR SOMEONE EXPLAIN OUR SITUATION TO THEM AND LET THEM KNOW THAT WE WANT TO HELP THEM WITH THEIR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BUT NOTHING ON A DAILY BASIS. IF THIS CANT BE WORKED OUT, HE BELIEVED THEY WILL HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO DO SOME- THING ON A CONTRACTUAL BASIS. JW REGARD TO ATTENDING THEIR REGULAR MEETINGS, UNLESS IT IS CONNECTED WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, HE FELT THE COUNTY SHOULD STAY OUT OF IT. HE NOTED THAT WE WERE MERELY TO ASSIST THEM IN PREPARING THE PLAN AND HE DID NOT WANT TO HAVE SOMEONE IN THE COUNTY ORGANIZATION DEVELOPING THE MUNICIPALITIES' PLAN FOR THEM. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER WODTKE, THAT THE CHAIRMAN BE AUTHORIZED TO ADVISE FELLSMERE AND SEBASTIAN OF OUR SITUATION; INDICATE THAT WE HAVE RUN OUT OF FUNDS FOR THEIR MASTER PLAN BUT WE WILL BE GLAD TO HELP THEM FURTHER ON A CONTRACTUAL BASIS WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE COUNTY'S PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE FINISHED FIRST. MAY 2 11980 .;, aao� : 43 `PA�t i6k -43PAGE"599 COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF BOTH THOSE MUNICIPALITIES ARE PLANNING TO APPLY FOR AN EXTENSION. MR. MARSH STATED THAT BOTH WILL APPLY FOR AN EXTENSION TO APPROXIMATELY SEPTEMBER OR OCTOBER. HIS INTENT WAS TO HAVE HAD MOST OF THE DRAFTS COMPLETED AROUND THE JULY DEADLINE AND GO INTO THE ADOPTION PROCESS FROM THAT POINT, BUT HE HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO DEVOTE ENOUGH TIME TO THIS BECAUSE OF HIS -CONSIDERABLE WORKLOAD WITH WABASSO PARK, THE TRACKING STATION, ETC. COMMISSIONER LOY STATED THAT SHE IS CONCERNED ABOUT ASSISTING THE MUNICIPALITIES SOMEHOW TO FINISH THEIR COMPREHENSIVE USE PLANS, AND SHE IS CONCERNED ABOUT CONTRACTING, BUT SHE WANTS THEM TO UNDER- STAND THAT MR. MARSH IS NOT AVAILABLE ON A DAILY BASIS. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD BE GLAD TO INCORPORATE THAT IN -HIS MOTION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ALSO FELT THAT WE SHOULD STATE WE WILL PROVIDE THE SERVICES TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY, BUT WE WOULD RECOMMEND THEY APPLY FOR THE SAME EXTENSION THAT THE COUNTY DOES BECAUSE WE CANNOT GIVE THEM PRIORITY. PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER BELIEVED THAT THE EXTENSION BY LAW IS FOR ONE YEAR, AND HE DID NOT FEEL THEY GRANT PARTIAL EXTENSIONS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT IF THEY OPT TO CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY FOR SERVICE, THEN WE HAVE TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING, AND IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS EMPHASIZED THAT WE WOULD ASSIST THEM WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT OUR PLAN MUST BE GIVEN PRIORITY, AND ONLY AS WE HAVE TIME AVAILABLE, WILL WE MAKE PERSONNEL AVAILABLE TO THEM ON A CONTRACTUAL BASIS. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT MR, MARSH DRAFT A LETTER FOR THE VICE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN ADVISING THE MUNICIPALITIES OF WHAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE USE PLAN ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY. -qo- COMMISSIONER WODTKE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE RECEIVED IN APRIL A CENSUS LOCAL REVIEW PROGRAM INFORMATION BOOKLET, WHICH IS AIMED AT IMPROVING THE ACCURACY OF THE CENSUS. IT IS HOPED THAT MOST LOCAL AREAS WILL HAVE THEIR OWN DATA ON HOUSING UNITS IN THE COMMUNITY TO COMPARE WITH THE CENSUS COUNT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE THEN READ FROM THE BOOKLET, STATING THAT THE REVISED LOCAL REVIEW PROGRAM WILL TAKE PLACE IN JUNE; THE GEOGRAPHICAL LEVEL OF REVIEW HAS BEEN REVISED FOR BLOCK AREAS; AND THE REVIEW PERIOD IS TEN WORKING DAYS. AFTER THIS REVIEW, THE COUNTY THEN CAN SUBMIT DIFFERENCES IF THEY DO NOT AGREE WITH THE CENSUS COUNT, BUT THIS MUST BE SUPPORTED BY HARD EVIDENCE. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SOMETIME IN JUNE WE WILL RECEIVE PRELIMINARY REPORTS ON THE CENSUS FIGURES FROM LAKELAND, AND HE WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THE BOARD'S WISHES ARE ABOUT DESIGNATING SOMEONE TO RESPOND. MR. REVER FELT POSSIBLY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CAN HELP WITH THIS. HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION IN THEIR OFFICE TO GENERATE FIGURES IN GROSS NUMBERS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED PART OF THE COUNTY; THEY CANNOT DO THIS BY DISTRICT, BUT COULD COME UP WITH A GROSS NUMBER THAT HE FELT THEY COULD SUBSTANTIATE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED THE PLANNING -DIRECTOR TO -REVIEW THIS MATTER AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ED REGAN CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO REQUEST THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE REQUISITION FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF THE ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS CONTRACT UNDER THE SECTION 8 EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAM. HE EXPLAINED THAT EVERY QUARTER WE SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR FUNDS TO HUD, AND THIS ONE IS FOR JUNE UNTIL THE END OF SEPTEMBER. HE NOTED THAT THESE FUNDS ARE ONLY FOR RENTAL ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS; THEY HAVE FUNDS IN THE BANK RELATIVE TO THE START-UP PERIOD AND HAVE HAD AN EXTENSION OF THE START-UP PERIOD BECAUSE THE FUNDS CAME IN LATE. THE FUNDS BEING REQUISITIONED ARE ENOUGH TO CARRY US THROUGH THE MONTH OF OCTOBER. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE REQUISITION FOR PARTIAL PAY- MENT OF THE ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS CONTRACT, SECTION 8, EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAM FOR THE PERIOD FROM JULY 1, 1980 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1980. MAY 2 i 1980 —91— BooK 4 PAc 5vfj Fit— MAA2 1980 6��oK 43PaG E 594 U.S. OLPARTMLNI-OF HOUSING AND URBAN ULV'�LOPMENT FOR HUD USE ONLY • e. REQUISITION FOR PAA7JAL PAYMENT OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS HOUSING A:SISTANCEi PAYMENTS PRO59AN1 lvurherNurnhr•r— SECTION 23 j ScCTION 8 f7a Vete of Rpouititian *lay 15, 1980Fitcal Yaar Fnding Date St 1't _ 30, 1980 For (luartlr Ending Sept. 30, 1980 /Il 1 NAMC AND ADDRESS OF PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY (Inciudi74 :it) t'ude) ACC Contract Number A-3409 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ProjectNumberFL-29E132-001 800, 20tli Plzice, Suite 3, Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 No. of Months in Fiscal Year 15 Type of Project: Dc7<;- I•I ARY RANK (Nome, address rend Arcount Number) First Citrus Bank Vero BCiICII, Fla. 32960 Aect. 1198-04000-1 © EXISTING G1 NEW � REHAB. s. of Units Under Lease to EligiSie Families as of Date of Requisition 33 -;wnated Number of Units to be under Lease at End of Requested Quarter 120 j c. Averaoa hlonthly Housing Assistance Payment Per Unit as of Date of Requisition 138 ESTIMATE OF I-STIMATED CUMULATIVE REQUIRED TOTAL COST ADDITIONAL CURT TO END TOTAL FUNDS DESCRIPTION ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS INCURRED TO DATE OF REQUESTED QUARTER - REQUIRED (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) T PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE % 1. Preliminary Administrative Expense -Prior to ACC (4ccount 4010) 0 0 0 20, 064 40, 387 20, 323 2. Preliminary Administrative Expense -After ACC (Account 4012) 40, 387 20 064 20 323 40 387 3. Total Preliminary Administrative Expense (Lincs I & r�-�` NONEXPENDABLE EQUIPMENT li+ 4. Rrplacement Nonexpendable Equipment 7520) 0. 0 0 of (.-Account " 5. Proporty 0etti,+ments and Additions(1c•c•rrurrt 75•10) `_ 8,675 1 705 , ----- — .(_10,380 _ 8,675 6. Total Nonexpendable Equipment (Lincs 4 & 5) 10,380 1,705 10,380 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 1.3/4,7514 10, 852 72,224 83 , 076 7. Housing Assistance Payments (Account 47/5) ADN41MISTRATIVE FEE 8. Total Administrative Fee Approved for Fisciil Year 17,760 9. Monthly Rete of Administrative Fee (Linc S divided h)= number ojmontht in fiscal year) 1,184 10. Amount Previously Requisitioned for fiscal year 10,626 0 11. Estimated Additional Amount Required to end of Requested Quarter 10,626 12. Total Administrative Fee (Lines 10 & 11) IIDZPEfJDETJT PUBLIC ACCCUNTAtNT AUU1T COSTS (Section,'? only) 13. Total Independent Public Accountant Audit Costs 0 0 j SECURITY AND UTILITY DEF17SI1S (Section 2, wlll') 14. Total Allowance Approved for Security and Utility Deposits 0 15. Amnunt Previously Requisitioned for Fiscal Year 0 0 13. Estimated Additional Amount Required to End of Requested Quarter 0 II :7.Total Security and Utility Deposits ILines 15 & 10 I AMOUNT OF THIS REQUISITION 18. Total Funds Requirad to End of Requrstcd Quarter (Lines 3, (i, 7, 1 ^, 144,469 1?.� 17) 1103,324 19. Total Partial Payments Received for Fiscal Year to Date 11,145 20. Partial Payment Requested (Line 1S minus Linc 19] IST 2NO 3RD TOTAL METHOD OF PAYMENT INSTALLMENT INSTALLMENT INSTALLMENT 21 Reque.-ted Installment Payments 13, 715 13,715 41,145 i t:ERTI -Y that housing assistvnes pmym:.n:s have han'n cr wili be made only with re=act to units which: 11) are under lease by Families at the time such Payments Contracts end (2) the Housing Agency has within h-. unq assistance payments are made except as otherwise provided in the Housing Aadstance unit year prior to the rnpking of such housing a>sistrnce payments, adoquatoly inspectxf or cnus+d to be inspected (including ihsm-etion of 9r•cunds, facilities. and ,:n•et f ,r the hrnrfit and use of the Fanlawg) to aware t!:at decent, safe and sanitary housing accommodations are being provided: that ull applicebfe Pro- v --eons of the above numbered Contrxt have been complied with by the Housing Agency; and that this requisition for annual contributions has been exam- ined by me aril to the best of my Icnowlec+(pr end b44iet it is true, correct and complete. Indian River County Board of C)unty Commissioners (N a i'u li ou ,r y �(1h,L) (til nature and 'i le of a//iris! ut�brited to certify) HUD FIELD OFFICE APPROVAL (.ti canafun• cared rel,• „ f t1!jnva! :S uth.,ri Mrd f„ ,1 ppruurF --- IUatel (15t NAL ACCOUNTING DIVISION PAYMLNT DATE CERTIFIED by: VOR AMOUNT PAID TIF CEFPAVA1t TOR II DPrevill+dated By Iln,(ials} MONTH of TO HUD -52x63 �Tl-ln'_ � � r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ED REGAN CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO DISCUSS THE REQUEST MADE BY THE HEAD START PROGRAM FOR REMOVAL OF DEBRIS AND A MEMO ESTIMATING THE COSTS INVOLVED IN THEIR REQUEST, AS FOLLOWS; Head Start of Indian River County A Child Development Progrwn- E.0.C. 355041ST'STRE:ET •;� r�.M ( r'1!� VGR() BEACH, FLORIDA 3496:0. ' 1 May 1, 1980 Telephone: 5674347 567-4348 Mr. Neil Nelson Asst. County Administrator 115 County Court House Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Mr. Nelson: A group of youths sponsored by the Florida Farm Workers Council working under the direction of Craig Rounds ane, Tyrone Reese has been clearing the property of the St. Helen's Bead Start Center located on 41st Street in Gifford as part of a beautification and recreation project in Indian River County. - There is a large amount of debrisaccumulated which must be carted off to the dump, and we would greatly appreciate it if you would provide county equipment to cart this material away since it represents a hazard to the children. Head Start will pay for any fees involved to have the materials carried away. Please contact me at 567-4347 if further information is needed. , -93- Sincerely, Addie B. Bennett Acting Head Start Director _ rr�� n MAY 2 11980 BoK ` 3 PAGE 5,95 TO: Neil Nelson MAY 2 1980 As istan C nty`Administrator c FROM: Edward R ga#j DATE May 12, )980 RE: Head Start of Indian River County Letter of May 1, 1980 $oa 43 596 On May 7 and 8 respectively, Gene Hamilton and I inspected the pile of debris that had been collected by the Florida Farmworkers Council at the St. Helen's Head Start Center. We estimate that there are 8 truckloads to be removed. I am of the opinion that each truckload will weigh approximately 1.25 tons. My estimate of the cost per truckload is $64.52. Since there are 8 truckloads, the total cost is $516.16.: The specific estimate is as follows: Cost of Debris Removal to Landfill Dump Truck @ $18.00 per hr. X 1.25 hrs. _ $22.50 Driver @ $ 3.94 per hr. X 1.25 hrs. = 4.93 $27.43 Loader @ $39.00 per hr. X .5 hrs. _ $19.50 Operator @ $4.34 per hr. X .5 hrs. = 2.17 $21.67 $49.10 Administrative Charge 8.5% 4.17 53.27 Average Load per truck 1.25 tons X $9 (landfill) 11.25 Cost to Landfill Dump $64.52 Number of trucks 8 $516.16 An alternate method of disposal is for the Head Start of Indian River -County to secure a permit to burn the debris. This would require its removal from the area of trees to a more open location. Once the debris is burned, the ash and residue could be carted off to the landfill. It is substantially less cost. Probably the residual would be less than one truckload. The cost of removal would then not exceed $120. EJR:mw 1 I -C C �27�2 ti MR. REGAN COMMENTED THAT THE HEAD START PROGRAM, WHICH IS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL OF THE EOC'S ACTIVITIES, HAS 18 EMPLOYEES, TWO SUPERVISORS, AND A YOUTH COUNSELOR, WHICH AMOUNTS TO A WEEKLY PAYROLL OF $2,5OO. HE THEN WENT ON TO TALK ABOUT UTILIZATION OF THE FLORIDA FARM WORKERS EMPLOYEES, WHO ARE YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE ANXIOUS TO DO SOMETHING WORTHWHILE. HE STATED THAT THEY ARE AN ON-GOING GROUP; THEY DO HAVE SUPERVISION, AND HE WISHED THE COUNTY TO BE AWARE THAT THERE IS A WORK FORCE OUT THERE WHICH HE FELT .WILL DO WHATEVER IS REQUESTED OF THEM THAT IS REASONABLE. HE FELT THAT PROBABLY WITH MINIMUM SUPERVISION THEY COULD ASSIST WITH PLANTING GRASS ON THE DUNES. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT HE HAS REQUESTED RALPH LUNDY TO MOVE AHEAD WITH THE SEEDING OF THE GIFFORD PARK, AND THIS IS A WORK FORCE THAT COULD PLANT GRASS ALL OVER THE COUNTY OR CLEAN PARKS, ETC. MR. REGAN CONTINUED THAT THE E.O.C. DOES NOT HAVE A LOT OF MONEY, BUT THEY DO HAVE ABOUT $100.00. THE LANDFILL CHARGES WOULD BE ABOUT $99.00, AND IF THE BOARD COULD AUTHORIZE THE USE OF A FRONT END LOADER AND TRUCKS TO REMOVE THE DEBRIS FROM THE AREA OF THE HEAD START ACTIVITIES, HE FELT IT WOULD BE A SUBSTANTIAL GESTURE OF COOPERATIVE EFFORT. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HIS PERSONAL FEELING IS THAT WE HAVE FALLEN INTO THE TRAP OF PROVIDING SERVICES FOR OTHER GOVERN- MENTALLY FUNDED AGENCIES TOO MANY TIMES. COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT THE LETTER FROM HEAD START STATED THAT THEY WOULD PAY ANY FEES INVOLVED, AND ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE TOLD THEM IT WOULD AMOUNT TO $516.001 THEY SAID THEY DID NOT HAVE THAT MUCH MONEY. COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHAT KIND OF DEBRIS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT, AND MR. REGAN STATED THAT IT WAS A MIXTURE OF BRANCHES, TRASH AND GARBAGE. DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO THE FACT THAT WE DO NOT MAKE ANY EXCEPTIONS TO THE LANDFILL CHARGES FOR ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, NOT EVEN OURSELVES. COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT WE ACTUALLY DONT KNOW WHAT KIND OF FUNDS THE E.O.C. HAS AVAILABLE. -95- THEY STATED THAT THEY ooK 43 -'PAGE 597 SAY 2 11980 � BooK 43 PgE 5�8 WERE WILLING TO PAY THE LANDFILL CHARGES, BUT APPARENTLY THEY HAD NOT THOUGHT THIS PROJECT THROUGH. COMMISSIONER LOY CONTINUED THAT THERE IS A SANITATION SERVICE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY, AND ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY THAT THEY COULD BURN SOME OF THE DEBRIS. SHE FURTHER NOTED THAT IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THIS DEBRIS CONTAINS GARBAGE THAT DOES NOT COME FROM THE CENTER. COMMISSIONER WODTKE EXPR-ESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE HAVE LOST OUR REPRESENTATIVE ON`THE E.O.C. BOARD, WHO WAS VERY MUCH INVOLVED WITH AND CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR FINANCIAL OPERATION. HE ALSO FELT THAT MR. LUNDY, WITH HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THAT AREA, VERY PROBABLY COULD GET SOMEONE WITH A FRUIT TRUCK OR SOMETHING OF THAT TYPE TO HAUL THE DEBRIS AWAY, WITH REGARD TO PARTICIPATING IN THE FARM WORKERS SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM, COMMISSIONER WODTKE WAS OF THE OPINION'THAT IT IS A WASTE OF FEDERAL FUNDS UNLESS THEY CAN FIND SOME- THING MORE CONSTRUCTIVE FOR THESE YOUNG PEOPLE TO DO THAN SIMPLY CLEAR UP DEBRIS. HE DID NOT FEEL THE COUNTY SHOULD GET INVOLVED WITH THE FARM WORKERS PROGRAM. COMMISSIONER LOY AGREED, NOTING THAT WE HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE IN THE PAST IN TRYING TO WORK WITH THESE GROUPS AND HAVE FOUND IT DEFINITELY UNSATISFACTORY. THEY ARE NOT COUNTY EMPLOYEES AND THEY DON'T GO BY OUR RULES AND REGULATIONS. SHE FELT THERE ARE OTHER THINGS THAT CAN BE DONE AND BELIEVED IT IS UP TO THESE ORGANIZATIONS TO FIND THEM AND DO IT THEIR WAY. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED WHY IT IS MR. REGAN'S OBLIGATION TO BRING THESE MATTERS TO THE BOARD. HE FELT THE AGENCIES SHOULD MAKE THESE REQUESTS THEMSELVES AND MR. REGAN SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BEAR THE BRUNT OF THE BOARDS DECISIONS. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THE REQUEST WAS MADE THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATOR`S OFFICE, AND THEY GOT MR. REGAN INVOLVED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DENIED THE REQUEST OF THE FLORIDA FARM WORKERS COUNCIL FOR COUNTY ASSISTANCE IN REMOVING DEBRIS AND DECLINED TO PARTICIPATE IN THEIR SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM. —96— ® r THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED MR. BEGAN°S REQUEST TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF A CETA CLERKITYPIST TO ASSIST WITH THE SECTION S EXISTING HOUSING RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. THIS MATTER WAS CONTINUED FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING, AND THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR REPORTED THAT MR. REGAN HAS SUBMITTED A JOB DESCRIPTION AND BELIEVES HE CAN KEEP SUCH AN EMPLOYEE BUSY. THEY CAN MAKE DO WITH THE PRESENT EQUIPMENT. MR. NELSON STATED THAT HE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE JUST USE THE PRESENT PERSONNEL UNTIL WE DETERMINE THE DIRECTION OF THIS PROGRAM. MR. REGAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS TWO PEOPLE WORKING ON THE RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - A PROGRAM MANAGER AND AN ACCOUNTING CLERK. HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE WORK TO KEEP A CETA CLERK/TYPIST ACTIVELY ENGAGED, AND THEY WOULD EMPLOY SOMEONE WHO ALREADY HAS TRAINING BUT NEEDS EXPERIENCE IN REAL WORK SITUATIONS. THIS PERSON WOULD BE AVAILABLE ON A SIX MONTH BASIS. HE NOTED THAT IT DOES NOT COST THE COUNTY ANY ACTUAL DOLLARS; IT WOULD GIVE THEM BETTER PRODUCTION; AND IT WOULD BRING THIS PERSON UP TO SPEED TO BE EMPLOYABLE. THE BOARD CONTINUED TO DISCUSS THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ALREADY EMPLOYED AND WORKING ON THIS PROGRAM AND THE FACT THAT ONLY 39 LEASES HAVE BEEN SIGNED. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT WE SEEM -TO SPEND A LOT OF MONEY ADMINISTERING THE PROGRAM FOR A VERY SMALL RETURN. MR, REGAN NOTED THAT THE COUNTY HAS A CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH HUD IN REGARD TO THIS PROGRAM AND THE MONIES INVOLVED, AND SOME- TIME DOWN THE PIKE THE BOARD WILL HAVE TO DECIDE WHETHER THEY WANT TO RETAIN THIS PROGRAM OR POSSIBLY TURN IT OVER TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. HE CONTINUED THAT HUD, BASED ON THEIR EXPERIENCE OVER THE YEARS, ARRIVED AT A COST TO GET A PROGRAM CRANKED UP, AND THEY NEGOTIATED A $40,000 START-UP COST WITH US,- PLUS $10,000 OF EQUIPMENT, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENTERING INTO APPROXIMATELY 120 LEASES. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT INITIALLY THE PROGRAM WE REQUESTED WAS FOR 100 UNITS AND WE SPELLED OUT THAT IT WOULD TAKE TWO YEARS TO LEASE THIS MANY, BUT THEY GAVE US 120 UNITS AND ONLY ONE YEAR TO LEASE THEM. WE DID NOT BELIEVE THIS WAS POSSIBLE, BUT THEY WANTED US TO TRY IT. MR. REGAN -97-43" MAY 2 -11980 BOOK FACE 59O. MAY 211980 sooK 43 PACE 600 CONTINUED THAT WE FOUND THAT WE WERE PROBABLY RIGHT THAT 50 IN A YEAR IS A LOT. HE THEN WENT ON TO REPORT THAT TWO OUT OF THREE LEASES WE ARE SIGNING ARE WITH LOW INCOME, WHITE AMERICANS, I.E., ONES WHO HAVE HANDICAPS, ARE ELDERLY, HAVE LOST JOBS, ETC. THIS PROGRAM IS FINDING APPLICATION IN THIS COMMUNITY ON A BROAD SPECTRUM. HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE HANDLED 204 CASES AND ARE WORKING AT A PRETTY GOOD PACE. HE NOTED THAT THEY ARE INTO OTHER PROGRAMS, AND TED REX, WHO IS PROJECT MANAGER FOR THE SECTION 8 PROGRAM,OFTEN EXCEED 40 HOURS A - WEEK - MEETING WITH VARIOUS GROUPS, 'FRYING TO GET OWNERS TO BRING THEIR STRUCTURES UP TO THE REQUIRED STANDARDS, ETC. MR. REGAN STATED THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET OWNERS TO IMPROVE THEIR STRUCTURES, PUT IN PLUMBING, ETC., AND ANTICIPATE GETTING PRETTY CLOSE TO 120 UNITS UP TO LEASING STANDARDS BY OCTOBER 1ST. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT HE HAD SAID THAT 50 UNITS WAS WHAT THEY ANTICIPATED, AND MR. REGAN SAID THAT WAS HIS FIRST PRESENTATION, BUT HE NOW BELIEVED THEY WILL BE BEYOND 50 BY THE END OF .JUNE. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THE PROGRAM IS GOING ALONG, BUT NOTED THAT THE BIG QUESTION IS WHETHER MORE CLERICAL HELP IS NEEDED AT THE PRESENT TIME. HE STATED THAT HE HAS THE SAME PROBLEM AS THE CHAIRMAN WHEN HE DIVIDES THE NUMBER OF CONTRACTS WITH THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE INVOLVED. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER WODTKEjTO DENY THE REQUEST FOR A CETA CLERK/TYPIST FOR THE SECTION 8 EXISTING HOUSING RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND TO TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT THE REQUEST IN ANOTHER 60 DAYS. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE ALSO IS NOT HAPPY WITH THESE PROGRAMS, BUT WE ARE IN THEM. SHE NOTED THAT WE ARE CONSTANTLY PUSHING MR. REGAN ON THIS RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM BECAUSE WE DON'T LIKE THE FIGURES, AND SHE WAS NOT SURE WE ARE TAKING THE RIGHT STEP WHEN WE PUSH THEM TO HURRY UP AND GET THESE LEASES UNDER CONTRACT AND DON T GIVE THEM ANY EXTRA HELP. SHE CONTINUED THAT IT IS HER UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CETA EMPLOYEE WOULD BE AVAILABLE ONLY FOR SIX MONTHS AND AT THE END OF SIX MONTHS THE JOB WOULD BE FINISHED, AND MAYBE THIS IS THE APPROPRIATE WAY TO G0, SHE COMMENTED THAT THE - -98� � PAYMENTS AND ALL THE FRINGE BENEFITS ARE HANDLED BY THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD VOTE FOR THE MOTION TO DENY FOR TWO REASONS - HE BELIEVED THE COST OF PLACING THESE PEOPLE IS GETTING ASTRONOMICAL AND TAXPAYERS' DOLLARS DO BELONG TO ALL OF US. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT MANY AGENCIES ARE NOT USING CETA EMPLOYEES BECAUSE THEY JUST DON T WORK AND WE HAD PROBLEMS WITH THEM BEFORE. COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT HE WOULD VOTE AGAINST HIS OWN MOTION BASED: ON COMMISSIONER LOY'S ARGUMENT, COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE ALSO DID NOT LIKE THE CETA PROGRAM. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS NOT SEEN THE WORKLOAD, BUT CANNOT UNDERSTAND HOW WITH A DIRECTOR, A SECRETARY, A PROGRAM DIRECTOR AND AN ACCOUNTING CLERK, THERE IS A NEED FOR A CLERK/TYPIST. MR. REGAN DISCUSSED THE MONIES LEFT AND THE FEES THEY WILL RAISE, WHICH HE ESTIMATED AT $31,000 PER YEAR. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED HOW MUCH HE ANCITIPATED IT WOULD TAKE TO RUN THE PROGRAM, AND MR. REGAN NOTED THAT THEY WILL BE TAKING ON MORE DUTIES WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND WHEN THEY FINISH THE LEASE -UP, THE PROGRAM MANAGER WILL HAVE MORE FREE TIME. COMMISSIONER LYONS CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONER WODTKE AND.CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN FAVOR; COMMISSIONERS DEESON, LYONS AND Loy VOTED IN OPPOSITION AND THE MOTION DID NOT CARRY. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, COMMISSIONER WODTKE AND CHAIRMAN SIEBERT VOTED IN OPPOSITION, THE BOARD APPROVED THE REQUEST OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF A CETA CLERK/TYPIST TO ASSIST WITH THE SECTION 8 EXISTING HOUSING RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT THE DOT WILL START REPAIRS ON THE MERRILL BARBER BRIDGE THE LAST OF .JUNE AND WILL GIVE NOTIFICA- TION PRIOR TO STARTING THE REPAIRS. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS REQUESTED THAT THEY EXPEDITE REPAIR OF THE BRIDGE ON NORTH U.S. 1, AND HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT IT IS TO BE COMPLETED THE WEEK OF .JUNE 28TH. CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE HERCULES KONTOULAS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT A PROBLEM HAD ARISEN WITH A BILL PRESENTED —99— Boos MAY 21 1980 .MAY 211980 BOOR -f 43� -PnE 60t, BY THE CONTRACTOR ON THE RENOVATION WORK. IT WAS NOT PRESENTED IN A TIMELY FASHION AND HAD SOME ERRORS IN IT. THE BOARD AGREED THAT THIS COULD BE HANDLED ADMINISTRATIVELY. MR. KONTOULAS REPORTED THAT THE DEMOLITION IS MOVING ALONG. COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMPLIMENTED MR. KONTOULAS ON HIS DAILY REPORTS AND FELT THEY COULD BE VERY IMPORTANT IN THE LONG RUN, THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND -TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF' -SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND NOS. 65862 - 66027 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE FUNDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 5:55 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: CLERK /CHAIRMAN - -100- m