HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/06/2006
INDEX TO MINUTES OF PRELIMINARY BUDGET HEARING
OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
1.CALL TO ORDER........................................................................................ 1
2.INVOCATION ............................................................................................... 1
3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE...................................................................... 2
4.BUDGET OVERVIEW ................................................................................ 2
5.AD VALOREM FUNDS ............................................................................... 3
A.AD VALOREM MILLAGE AND AD VALOREM BUDGET ............... 3
GENERALFUND ...............................................................................................................3
M.S.T.U. ...............................................................................................................................7
TF .......................................................................................................8
RANSPORTATION UND
ESD .........................................................................................9
MERGENCY ERVICES ISTRICT
ESLA ........................................................ 10
NVIRONMENTALLY ENSITIVE AND CQUISITION
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
1
LANDACQUISITIONBONDS–2004REFERENDUM ............................................. 10
A ....................................................................................................................... 11
GGREGATE
6.SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT BUDGET (NON-AD
VALOREM SPECIAL DISTRICT) ......................................................... 12
A.A2006-2007PCB ..................................... 12
NNOUNCE ROPOSED HARGE AND UDGET
B.PC ................................................................................................. 12
UBLIC OMMENTS
C.CPA ....................................................... 12
ONSIDERATION OF ROPOSED MENDMENTS
D.ATN-AVAR ...................... 12
DOPTION OF ENTATIVE OND ALOREM SSESSMENT ATES
E.ATB ......................................................................... 13
DOPTION OF ENTATIVE UDGET
7.NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT CHARGES ............................... 13
A.PN-AVADCFY
ROPOSED OND ALOREM SSESSMENT ISTRICT HARGES FOR
2006/2007 ................................................................................................................ 13
B.PC ................................................................................................. 14
UBLIC OMMENTS
C.CAPACRC .... 15
ONSIDER NY ROPOSED MENDMENTS AND ALCULATE EVISED HARGE
D.ATC .................................................................................. 15
DOPT ENTATIVE HARGES
8.NON-AD VALOREM DOLLAR BUDGETS .......................................... 15
A.FY2006/2007PBA .................................................. 15
ROPOSED UDGETS NNOUNCED
B.PC ................................................................................................. 16
UBLIC OMMENTS
C.CPA ............................................................... 16
ONSIDER ANY ROPOSED MENDMENTS
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
2
D.TBA ................................................................................ 16
ENTATIVE UDGET DOPTED
9.A.ANNOUNCE TIME AND PLACE OF FINAL BUDGET
HEARING .................................................................................................... 16
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
3
September 6, 2006
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in the
th
County Commission Chambers, 1840 25 Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, September 6,
2006, at 5:01 p.m. to conduct the FY 2006/2007 preliminary budget hearing. Present were
Chairman Arthur R. Neuberger, Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler, Commissioners Sandra L.
Bowden, Wesley S. Davis, and Thomas S. Lowther. Also present were County Administrator
Joseph A. Baird, County Attorney William G. Collins II, Executive Aide to the Board Kimberly
Massung, Management & Budget Director Jason E. Brown, and Deputy Clerk Patricia Ridgely.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Neuberger called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.
2. INVOCATION
Reverend Michael Malone, Senior Pastor, Indian River Presbyterian Church,
delivered the Invocation.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Neuberger led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
4. BUDGET OVERVIEW
County Administrator Baird presented an overview of the budget for FY 2006-2007
totaling $472,520,328, about 5.7% above last year or $25 million. He listed the reasons for the
increase which included 66 new positions proposed and related costs, increased insurance and fuel
costs, debt service on a new land acquisition bond, and replacement of fire stations. He noted that
there is a possibility that the Sandridge Golf Course might need a new irrigation system and it
might be necessary to increase the fee mid-year. There are no increases proposed for the Solid
Waste fees.
County Administrator Baird then explained each of the tax funds that appear on tax
bills: the general fund (all property owners pay); MSTU (Municipal Service Taxing Unit) taxing
funds (unincorporated area property owners pay); and the Emergency Services Taxing District
(fire, paramedic, paid by all property owners except Indian River Shores); and debt reduction
funds for two land acquisition bonds (paid by all property owners).
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
2
5. AD VALOREM FUNDS
A. AD VALOREM MILLAGE AND AD VALOREM BUDGET
GENERALFUND
County Administrator Baird announced the proposed budget for the general fund is
$85,992,375; and the proposed millage is 3.1973, 10.14% above rollback and 9.7% below current
rate of 3.5204. He specified the reasons for the $7,980,000 increase in the budget, which mainly
have to do with the increased number of positions.
Chairman Neuberger opened the floor to public comments.
Frank Coffey,
on behalf of the Taxpayers Association of Indian River County,
narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the Sheriff’s proposed budget that he advised was the same
as previously presented during the July Budget Workshop. (Copy of PowerPoint presentation is
on file with the backup.) At the conclusion of his presentation, Mr. Coffey asked for clarification
on the (1) appropriateness of using impact fees for existing facilities or only for new facilities; (2)
whether the Sheriff’s Citizens Review Committee is required to operate under the Sunshine Law;
and (3) if the funding appropriated to the Sheriff for capital equipment could be moved from one
account to another.
County Attorney Collins explained that funds derived from law enforcement impact
fees could not go toward any salary expense. He referred to the ordinance that set up the impact
fees, and opined that the revenues should go to capital facilities needed to equip the deputies that
would be required to accommodate new growth and maintain the level of service.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
3
County Attorney Collins thought that a law enforcement advisory committee would
be subject to Sunshine Law.
As to the question about shifting money, Management & Budget Director Jason E.
Brown explained that Florida Statutes govern the budget of the Sheriff and the Sheriff must stay
within those limits. The Sheriff must have Board approval to move money between the different
categories. The Sheriff received approval earlier this year to make adjustments.
Vice Chairman Wheeler recalled that the Board voted last year to allow the Sheriff
to move money by simply notifying the Commission that he had moved that money and it was not
required any longer to come before this Board for approval. County Administrator Baird
confirmed that Vice Chairman Wheeler was correct. Director Brown recalled that the blanket
approval given was just for this current fiscal year.
Sheriff Roy Raymond expressed his frustration with Mr. Coffey’s remarks and
presentation, and recounted his invitations to Mr. Coffey and the Taxpayers Association to attend
his budget preparation meetings and his previous explanations at the Workshop in July.
th
Leroy Kelly
, 14020 85 Street, appealed to the Board’s compassion in regard to the
millage rate. He thought property values have increased dramatically, and he thought it was not
entirely fair to say the millage rate is down. He pointed out that property values are market driven,
but millage rates are not.
Commissioner Davis stated that it appears a resolution of the inequities caused by
the “Save Our Homes” initiative may come by a millage cap and a tax cap. He advised that he had
been asked to sit on the taxpayers committee of the Florida Association of Counties.
There were no other speakers and the Chairman closed the public comment.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
4
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lowther,
SECONDED by Commissioner Davis, for discussion, to
return the general fund millage rate to rollback.
Under discussion, staff pointed out that the budget would need to be cut $5.3
million. Discussion ensued on how it could be done.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion
failed 2-3 (Chairman Neuberger, Commissioner Bowden
and Vice Chairman Wheeler opposed.)
MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Wheeler,
SECONDED by Chairman Neuberger, to work with the
Constitutional Officers before next Wednesday to cut their
budgets by $5 million.
County Administrator Baird asked for clarification on how that could be achieved,
saying he would need to advertise and would need time to get with the Constitutional Officers and
make a recommendation.
Commissioner Bowden admonished her colleagues saying it seemed they were
flying by the seat of their pants. She said that quality of service is expected and the County has to
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
5
provide it. She declared that such an action was not appropriate. She also suggested the
Commissioners consider lowering their own salaries.
Vice Chairman Wheeler agreed this was a dilemma because the same people who
want the service also want the budget cut.
Chairman Neuberger declared that the time to make these kinds of changes was at
the workshops in July. He believed that such a change would reduce a taxpayer’s bill by about
$100 but it would negatively impact services.
County Administrator Baird agreed it was too late to make such a change; it was not
good planning, but was good rhetoric.
Vice Chairman Wheeler agreed the Board had time to do this previously, but now, at
th
the 11 hour, was not the time to do it.
Vice Chairman Wheeler WITHDREW his motion.
MOTION WAS DECLARED dead.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lowther, SECONDED by
Chairman Neuberger, the Board adopted the proposed
millage (3.1973) for the General Fund by a 4-1 vote.
(Commissioner Davis opposed.)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowden, SECONDED by
Chairman Neuberger, the Board unanimously adopted the
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
6
proposed budget in the amount of $85,992,375 for the
General Fund.
M.S.T.U.
County Administrator Baird read into the record the proposed millage and budget.
He gave highlights of this budget explaining that this tax is paid by all residents in the
unincorporated areas.
The Chairman opened the floor to public comment. There were no speakers and the
Chairman closed the public comment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed millage of 1.1336 for the M.S.T.U.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed budget in the amount of $31,594,558 for the
M.S.T.U.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
7
TF
RANSPORTATION UND
County Administrator Baird gave details about the proposed Transportation Fund
budget; there is no millage rate. The proposed budget is $18,119,253.
The Chairman opened the floor to public comment. There were no speakers and the
Chairman closed the public comment.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis,
SECONDED by Vice Chairman Wheeler, to adopt the
proposed millage for the Transportation Fund in the amount
of $18,119,253.
Under discussion, Commissioner Davis expressed concerns about unpaved roads
and grading and maintenance of unpaved roads.
County Administrator Baird recounted that the heavy dump trucks related to the
sand mines are tearing up the unpaved roads. He believed the sand mine company needs to pave
their roads because the County receives numerous calls about their condition.
Public Works Director Jim Davis pointed out that Road and Bridge is having
difficulty purchasing road material with the strength and bearing value to support the vehicles on
unpaved roads and also that the costs of materials has gone up considerably.
Discussion ensued on the problems that the whole state is having in obtaining good
road materials.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
8
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and the motion
carried unanimously. (Transportation Fund proposed
budget of $18,119,253 adopted.)
ESD
MERGENCY ERVICES ISTRICT
County Administrator Baird read the proposed millage of 1.7639 and the proposed
budget amount of $30,063,673 and gave pertinent information that has affected this budget.
The Chairman opened the floor to public comment. There were no speakers and the
Chairman closed the public comment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed millage of 1.7639 for the Emergency Services
District.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Chairman Neuberger, the Board unanimously adopted the
proposed budget of $30,063,673 for the Emergency
Services District.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
9
ESLA
NVIRONMENTALLY ENSITIVE AND CQUISITION
County Administrator Baird announced the proposed millage rate of 0.1406 and the
proposed budget of $2,423,262 for the Land Acquisition Bond.
The Chairman opened the floor to public comment. There were no speakers and the
Chairman closed the public comment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Vice Chairman Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed millage of 0.1406 for the Environmentally
Sensitive Land Acquisition Bond fund.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed budget of $2,423,262 for the Environmentally
Sensitive Land Acquisition Bond fund.
LANDACQUISITIONBONDS–2004REFERENDUM
County Administrator announced the proposed millage rate of 0.2702 and the
proposed budget for the debt service as $4,597,671.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
10
The Chairman opened the floor to public comment. There were no speakers and he
closed the public comment period.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed millage rate of 0.2702 for the Land
Acquisition Bonds – 2004 Referendum.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Vice Chairman Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed budget of $4,597,671 for the Land
Acquisition Bonds – 2004 Referendum.
A
GGREGATE
County Administrator Baird announced the proposed aggregate millage is 5.3681
and is 8.82% above rollback. He explained that no one pays this, but it is a figure required by the
State to be calculated.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
11
6. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT BUDGET (NON-AD
VALOREM SPECIAL DISTRICT)
A. A2006-2007PCB
NNOUNCE ROPOSED HARGE AND UDGET
County Administrator Baird announced the proposed SWDD charges and budget.
B.PC
UBLIC OMMENTS
The Chairman opened the floor to public comment. There were no speakers and he
closed the public comment period.
C.CPA
ONSIDERATION OF ROPOSED MENDMENTS
There was no discussion on the proposed amendments.
D.ATN-AVAR
DOPTION OF ENTATIVE OND ALOREM SSESSMENT ATES
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed $46.50 per Residential Waste Generation Unit
($74.40 House).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed $31.41 per Commercial Waste Generation
Unit.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
12
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed Readiness-to-Use Fee of $20.02.
E.ATB
DOPTION OF ENTATIVE UDGET
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed $12,231,100 budget for the SWDD.
7. NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT CHARGES
A. PN-AVADC
ROPOSED OND ALOREM SSESSMENT ISTRICT HARGES
FY2006/2007
FOR
County Administrator Baird announced FY 2006/2007 proposed charges for each of
the following Non-Ad Valorem Assessment Districts:
1. Vero Lake Estates M.S.B.U. $19.00
2. East Gifford Stormwater M.S.B.U. $15.00
3. Gifford Street Lighting District $21.00
4. Laurelwood Street Lighting District $18.00
5. Rockridge Street Lighting District $13.00
6. Vero Highlands Street Lighting District $23.00
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
13
7. Porpoise Point Street Lighting District $15.00
8. Laurel Court Street Lighting District $25.00
9. Tierra Linda Street Lighting District $24.00
10. Vero Shores Street Lighting District $21.00
11. Ixora Park Street Lighting District $19.00
12. Royal Poinciana Street Lighting District $28.00
13. Roseland Road Street Lighting District $ 2.00
14. Whispering Pines Street Lighting District $19.00
15. Moorings Street Lighting District $14.00
16. Walker’s Glen Street Lighting District $25.00
17. Glendale Lakes Street Lighting District $38.00
18. Floralton Beach Street Lighting District $29.00
B.PC
UBLIC OMMENTS
The Chairman opened the floor to public comment. There were no speakers and he
closed the public comment period.
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
14
C.CAPAC
ONSIDER NY ROPOSED MENDMENTS AND ALCULATE
RC
EVISED HARGE
There were no revisions.
D.ATC
DOPT ENTATIVE HARGES
ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed Non-Ad-Valorem Assessment Charges as
listed above.
8.NON-AD VALOREM DOLLAR BUDGETS
A.FY2006/2007PBA
ROPOSED UDGETS NNOUNCED
County Administrator Baird announced the FY 2006/2007 proposed budgets for the
following budgets:
1. Housing Authority $ 222,422
2. Special Revenue Funds $151,070,108
3. Other Debt Service Fund $ 1,244,063
4. Capital Projects $ 58,124,480
5. Enterprise Funds $ 51,761,565
6. Internal Service Funds $ 25,075,798
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
15
B.PC
UBLIC OMMENTS
The Chairman opened the floor to public comment. There were no speakers and he
closed the public comment period.
C.CPA
ONSIDER ANY ROPOSED MENDMENTS
There were no proposed amendments.
D.TBA
ENTATIVE UDGET DOPTED
ON MOTION BY Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Vice Chairman Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
the proposed Non-Ad Valorem Budgets as listed above.
9.A. ANNOUNCE TIME AND PLACE OF FINAL BUDGET
HEARING
Chairman Neuberger announced that the Final Budget hearing would be held at 5:01
P.M. on Wednesday, September 13, 2006, at the County Administration Building, Commission
Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida.
ALL BACKUP DOCUMENTATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
AND IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
16
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the
Board adjourned at 6:22 P.M.
ATTEST:
_________________________________ ________________________________
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Arthur N. Neuberger, Chairman
Minutes Approved: _________________
PR
SEPTEMBER 6, 2006
17