HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/24/1980WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1980
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
1053 20TH PLACE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24,
1980, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.,
CHAIRMAN; ALMA LEE LOY, VICE CHAIRMAN; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, SJR.; AND
PATRICK B. LYONS, R. DON DEESON WAS OUT OF TOWN. ALSO PRESENT
WERE NEIL A. NELSON, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR.,
ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; .JEFFREY K. BARTON,
FINANCE OFFICER; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES AND JANICE CALDWELL, DEPUTY
CLERKS. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS WAS OUT OF TOWN.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
0
COMMISSIONER LOY LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG,
AND THE REVEREND DALLAS ENFINGER, GLENDALE BAPTIST CHURCH, GAVE THE
INVOCATION.
ADDITIONS TO AGENDA
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA.
COMMISSIONER LOY REQUESTED ADDING AN ITEM IN REGARD TO
HAVING THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT PAY THE BILLS FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY FIRE
DISTRICT; THIS ITEM TO FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY AFTER DISCUSSION OF THE
SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT ON THE AGENDA TODAY.
ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED ADDING AN ITEM CONCERNING THE
TAX ANTICIPATION NOTES,
COMMISSIONER LOY COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD SHOULD HAVE THE
RIGHT TO ADD ANYTHING ON THE AGENDA CONCERNING THE BUDGETS BECAUSE OF
THE SCHEDULING OF THE HEARINGS.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING THE ABOVE ITEMS TO THE
AGENDA.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 27, 1980.
Boas 44 eAcE 553
SEP 241990
SEP 2 4198® BOOK � 4 PAGE554
COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 24, SECOND LINE
FROM THE BOTTOM, "EMINENT" BE CORRECTED TO "IMMINENT."
THE CORRECTION HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 27, 1980, AS WRITTEN.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS
TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1980.
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 11, LINE 27,
"DISTURBIND" BE CORRECTED TO "DISTURBING."
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 13, LINE 8, INSERT
"LINER" AFTER THE WORD "DIRECTOR."
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 35, LINE 1, USE
"THE OWNERS" IN PLACE OF "A DEVELOPER."
THOSE CORRECTIONS HAVING BEEN MADE, ON MOTION BY COMMIS-
SIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1980,
AS WRITTEN.
APPROVAL OF CLERKS AGENDA
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AN APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO
CARRY A CONCEALED FIREARM FOR .JAMES KNAPP AND WALLACE CARTER.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE FOR THE
FOLLOWING DEPUTIES APPOINTED BY SHERIFF .JOYCE:
GLEN M. GARFIELD
WILLIAM STEVEN SMITH
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR JUDITH A.
WAKEFIELD, COUNTY EXTENSION DIRECTOR, AS FOLLOWS:
Oct. 1-2 Gainesville State 4-H Horse Advisory Committee
meeting.
am the Area's Agent Representa-
tive to this planning committee
along with a 4-H leader from this
county and one from Lake County.
The Advisory Committee meets
once a year with the State Horse
Specialist to plan educational
programs for 4-H and evaluate
rules for participation in 4-H
Horse Shows on the Area and State
level.
ON POTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BUDGET ACCOUNT AMENDMENT No, 3
FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, AS FOLLOWS:
k
SEP 2 4 1980 Boas 44, PACE 555 .
Rvj
s
UZ
0
0
m
R.
� ILL. W
cpwY £
ti=N
2¢U 5a
crOZ
�
0(rZ �
JILL pD
1
INDIAN RIVER
Sheriff's Department
INDIAN RIVER
Board of County Commissioners
BUDGET ACC®UMT AMEN®S.9ENT
COUNTY
No.. 3 FY: 1979/80
COUNTY
Budget Accounts
411 SALARY OF SHERIFF
412 SALARIES OF DEPUTIES AND ASSISTANTS
42 MATCHING FUNDS, SOCIAL SECURITY,
RETIREMENT, & OTHER BENEFITS
43/4 EXPENSES OTHER THAN SALARIES
45 EQUIPMENT
46 INVESTIGATIONS
47 CONTINGENCIES
I hereby request approval for the amendrr%nt
Original Budget or Last
Amended
FY 1979/80
$ 26,005.00
1,255,728.00
239,179.00
615,133.00
77,095.00
7,500.00
-0-
DATE REQUESTED
FORM 76-7.4
September 16, 1980
Amendments Requested
$ -0-
(-17,000.00)
(- 3,000.00)
+20,000.00
-0-
_0-
-0-
TOTAL BUDGET $ 2,220,640.00 $ 20,000.00
This is to acknowledge rqce/by theXoa/of
Signat
Title: Chairman
Commissioners.
Date: a...,
get as set forth below:
Budget Including Amend-
ments Requested
$ 26,005.00
1,238,728.00
236,179.00
635,133.00
77,095.00
7,500.00
-0-
$ 2,220,640.00
ll
This is to certify that this budget account amendment has been
Approved/
Date: _
gnature , 6
rlt
Title:
.t
.7r' Bowen Supply Co . Ltd , Plant City, Fla JO -S 3134+. I
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAYROLL, CIRCUIT
COURT, SPRING TERM, 1980, IN THE AMOUNT OF $244.82.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAYROLLS, COUNTY
COURT, AUG. -SEPT. TERM, 1980, IN THE AMOUNTS OF $78.06, $214.92, AND
$183.28.
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK;
RECEIPT FOR DEPOSIT OF COUNTY FUNDS, N0, 1324,
SHERIFF - $1,295.45
REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, CIRCUIT COURT, MONTH OF
AUGUST, 1980.
THE BOARD DISCUSSED ITEM 5 OF THE CLERKS AGENDA CONCERNING
APPROVAL OF YEAR END BUDGET AMENDMENTS.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER WODTKE, THAT THE BOARD APPROVE THE BUDGET TRANSFERS IN THE
GENERAL FUND, AS OUTLINED IN THE MEMORANDUM OF SEPTEMBER 17TH FROM
THE FINANCE OFFICER.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT HE REVIEWED THIS
WITH THE FINANCE OFFICER AND HOPED THAT THE ADMINISTRATOR WOULD
STUDY THIS MATTER, PARTICULARLY IN THE AREA OF SALARIES.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THEY HAVE ALREADY INSTITUTED
THE FIRST STEP, WHICH IS TO GIVE EACH DEPARTMENT HEAD A PRINT-OUT
SHEET OF HIS BUDGET IN ORDER FOR THE DEPARTMENT HEAD TO KNOW HIS
EXACT POSITION ON THE BUDGET.
FINANCE OFFICER BARTON COMMENTED THAT THEY WILL HAVE A MID-
YEAR REVIEW ON EACH DEPARTMENT S SPENDING, WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN DONE
BEFORE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE (QUESTION.
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
IT WAS VOTED ON AND
SEP 2 41980 5 B°0K 44 PAcF 557
- 1
SEP 2 41980 BOOK 44 PAG658
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 17, 1980
MEMO TO:
`{J
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: �'�l
JEFFREY K. BARTON,
FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE:
Budget Transfers -
General Fund
The following budget amendment is
necessary to allocate
the necessary funds to the overexpended
accounts. The
necessary funds are being transferred
from the General Fund
Reserve for Contingencies.
1 recommend
the following budget
amendment to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
DEPT. NAME
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE DECREASE
Other Contactual
Civil Defense
Services
001-208-525-33.49
$ 900
Mileage
001-208-525-34.01
$ 350
Telephone
001-208-525-34.11
$ 400
Maint. Other
Equipment
001-208-525-34.69
$ 550
Postage
001-208-525-34.21
$ 50
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
$ 2,250
Parks
Salaries
001-210-572-11.12
$ 9,000
Social Security
001-210-572-12.11
$ 800
A
Page Two
September 17, 1980
SEP 2 41980
800K 44 PACE 557
I
DEPT. NAME
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
Retirement
001-210-572-12.12
$
820
Ins -Life & Health
001-210-572.12.13
$
4,700
Unemploy. Comp.
001-210-572.12.15
$
4,000
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
$ 19,320
Welfare
-
Hospital
001-211'-564-33.17
$
8,000
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
$ 8,000
Ag. Agent & Economist
Telephone
001-212-537-34.11
$
200
Auto Insurance
001-212-537-34.51
$
360
Fuel & Lubricants
001-212-537-35.21
$
280
Other Operating
Supplies
001-212-537-35.29
$
220
Reserve for
Contingencies
001-199-513-99.91
$ 1,060
Purchasing
Overtime
001-216-519.11.14
$
250
Ins. Life & Health
001-216-519-12.13
$
125
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
$ 375
Bldg. Cths & Annex
Other Insurance
001-220-519-34.59
$
51,000
Other Buildings
001-220-519-66.29
$
4,000
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
$ 55,000
Bldg. Admin.
Overtime
001-221-519-11.14
$
30
Other Prof Serv.
001-221-519-33.19
$
250
Janitoral Serv.
001-221-519-33.41
$
330
Other Cont. Serv.
001-221-519-33.49
$
11,000
Telephone
001-221-519-34.11
$
370
Legal Ads.
001-221-519-34.91
$
2,300
Appeal Fees.
001-221-519-34.96
$
60
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
$ 14,340
SEP 2 41980
800K 44 PACE 557
I
SEP 2 41990
Page Three
September 17, 1980
DEPT. NAME
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
Cost Assoc. Renov.
Other Prof. Sery
001-227-519-33.19
Janitoral Serv.
001-227-519-33.41
Other Cont. Serv.
001-227-519-33.49
Telephone
001-227-519-34.11
Other Utility Serv.
001-227-519-34.39
Rent.- Bldgs.
00,1-227-519-34.42
Rent -Other Equipment
001-227-519-34.49
Maint- Bldgs.
001-227-519-34.61
License & Permits
001-227-519-34.97
All Office Supplies
001-227-519-35.11
Expendable Tools
001-227-519-35.26
Other Oper. Supplies
001-227-519-35.29
Office Furn & Equip
001-227-519-66.41
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
Expense - Prior Year
001-299-513-36.72
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
Telephone
001-902-516-34.11
Witness Fees
001-902-516-34.92
Books -Magazines
001-902-516-35.41
Reserve for Cont..
001-199-513-99.91
Rent - Bldgs.
001-903-516-34.42
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
Other Reporter Serv.
001-905-516-33.32
Reserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
Expense Prior Yr
001-906-523-36.72
Rserve for Cont.
001-199-513-99.91
INCREASE
$ 260
$ 1,450
$ 900
$ 100
$ 600
$ 25,200
$ 780
$ 6,,500
$ 80
$ 70
$ 60
$ 2,750
$ 2,150
$ 35,050
$ 470
$ 800
$ 100
$ 3,250
$ 8,,500
$ 8,305
BOOK
DECREASE
44 PAcF 560
$ 40,900
$ 35,050
$ 1,370
$ 3,250
$ 8,500
$ 8,305
I'I
l�
September 18, 1980
Page Four
ACCOUNT TITLE
Boating Facilities
Boating Facilities
Salaries
Reserve for Cont.
Salaries
Reserve for Cont.
J KB/ksg
SEP 2 41990
® M
ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
0017000-334.72.00 $ 6,572
Recreation
ool-lo8-572-66.38 $ 6,572
Admin. Operations
001-201-512-11.12 $ 7,620
001-199-513-99.91 $ 7,620
001-221-519.11.12 $ 2,700
001-199-513-99.91 $ 2,700
Boa 44 PAGE 561
Book 44 PAA" 562
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 17, 1980
MEMO TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM:fn
JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - Road and Bridge Fund
The following budget amendment is necessary to allocate
the necessary funds to the overexpended accounts. The nec-
essary funds are being transferred from the Road and Bridge
Reserve for Contingencies account.
I recommend the following budget amendment to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
City of Indian
River Shores
002-214-541.03.00
$
21
City of Sebastian
" 002-214-541.04.00
$
4
Town of Orchid
002-214-541-06.00
$
1
Unemploy. Comp.
002-214-541-12.15
$
2,500
All Other Travel
002-214-541-34.02
$
100
Telephone
002-214-541-34.11
$
1000
Postage
002-214-541-34.21
$
10
Other Transport
Service
002-214-541-34.29
$
75
Page Two
September 17, 1980
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE DECREASE
Rent - Land
002-214-541-34.41
$
125
Rent - Other
Equipment
002-214-541-34.49
$
1,300
Maint-Auto
Equipment
002-214-541-34.64
$
12,000
Maint-Struct
Except Bldgs.
002-214-541-34.66
$
410
Maint-Other
Equipment
002-214-541-34.69
$
22,000
Fuel & Lubricants
002-214-541-35.21
$
11,000
Tires & Tubes
002-214-541-35.22
$
35,000
Chemicals
002-214-541-35.23
$
4,000
Institutional
Supplies
002-214-541-35.25
$
2,000
Expendable Tools
002-214-541-35.26
$
6,500
Other Operating
Supplies
002-214-541-35.29
$
17,000
Miscellaneous Exp.
002-214-541-36.71
$
15
Expense Prior Year
002-214-541-36.72
$
160
Maint.-Structure
Except Bldgs.
002-214-512-34.66
$
60
Expense Prior Year
002-299-513-36.72
$-21,000
Reserve for Cont.
002-199-541-99.91
$ 136,381
SEP 2 41980
Boa 4.4 PACE 553
SEP 2 41980
R
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
44 PAS€ 564
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 17, 1980
MEMO TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - Municipal Service Fund
The following budget amendment is necessary to allocate
the necessary funds to the overexpended accounts. The necessary
funds are being transferred from the Municipal Service Fund's
Reserve for Contingencies.
I recommend the following budget amendment to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
Telephone 004-110-515-34.11 $ 200
Maint.- Other
Equipment 004-215-536-34.69 $ 3,000
Reserve for Cont. 004-199-513-99.91
$ 3,200
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
November 18, 1980
MEMO TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: 06 JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - Revenue Sharing
The following budget amendment is necessary to allocate
the necessary funds to the overexpended accounts. The necessary
funds are being Transferred from the Revenue Sharing Reserve
for Contingencies.
I recommend the following budget amendment to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
Funds Transfers 102-199-581-99.21 $ 50,000
Int. Debt
Service 102-199-584-77.21 $ 5,380
Youth Guidance
Office Equip.
102-213-523-66.41
$
20
Purchasing
Licenses
102-216-519-34.97
$
20
Other Bldgs.
102-216-519-66.29
$
1,770
Office Furn. &
Circuit Court
Equipment
102-901-516-66.41
$
110
County Jail
Office Bldgs.
102-906-523-66.21
$
4,000
Reserve for
Contingencies
102-199-584-99.91
$ 61,300
SEP 2 41980 44 Fast 565
SEP 2 41980
Book 44 PAcE 566
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 17, 1980
MEMO TOO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
I..JCJ
FROM:JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - HUD Section 8 Rental
Assistance
Per the attached request from Ted Rex the following
budget amendment is requested.
I recommend the following budget amendment to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
Office Supplies
108-222-564-35.11
$
876
Institutional
Supplies
108-222-564-35.25
$
3
Other Operating
Supplies
108-222-564-35.29
$
62
Other Road Mat']
108-222-564-35.39
$
108
Books -Magazines
108-222-564-35.41
$
207
Rental Asst.
Payments
108-222-564-36.73
$12,512
Office Furn.
108-222-564-66.41
$
1,497
Automotive
108-222-564-66.42
$
16
Cash Forward
108-222-564-99.92
$ 15,281
JKB/ksg
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Ted Rex
DATE: 9/17/80
RE: Revision of FY 80 Budget to cover expenses.
Request that $15,281.00 be withdrawn from our 108-222-564-99.92,
Cash Forward account and be re -allocated to the following accounts,
by the amounts listed:
108-222-564-35.11
Office Supplies
$876.00
" 35.25
Institutional Supplies
3.00
" 35.29
Other Operating Supplies
62.00
" 35.39
Other Road Mat'l/Supplies
108.00
" 35.41
Books -Magazines
207.00
" 36.73
Rental. Assistance Payments
12,512.00
" 66.41
Ofc. Furn & Equip
1,497.00
" 66.42
Automotive
16.00
SEP 2 41980
L-
Total
15,281.00
8009
44 PAGE 567
SEP 2 41980
Boa 4.4 PACE 568
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 18, 1980
MEMO TO::��e11 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - Landfill Waste Disposal
The following budget:•amendmen- is necessary to allocate
the necessary funds to the overexpended accounts. The
necessary funds are being transferred from the Landfill Reserve
for Contingencies.
I recommend the following budget amendment to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
License & Permits
411-217-534-34.97
$
20
Engineering Serv.
411-217-534-33.13
$
3,000
Rent - Other Eqmt.
411-217-534-34.49
$
250
Outside Printing
411-217-534-34.72
$
100
Dues -Membership
411-217-534-35.42
$
100
Other Mach & Eqmt.
411-217-534-66.49
$
5.500
Maint.-Other Eqmt.
411-217-534-34.69
$
500
Reserve for Cont.
411-199-534-99.91
$ 9,470
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE. JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 18, 1980
MEMO TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE
OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - North
County Utilities
The following budget amendment is
necessary to allocate
the necessary funds to the overexpended
accounts. The necessary
funds are being allocated by.'an... increase
to Water Sales.=revenue-
accountewhich was understated.
461-218-536-34.66
I recommend the following budget amendment to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE DECREASE
Economic Dev. Act 461-000-331-53.00
$ 20,000
Funds Transfers 461-199-581-99.21
$ 20,000
Other Prof. Serv. 461=218-536-33.19
$ 3,100
Other Cont. Serv. 461-218-536.33.49
$ 400
Mileage 461-218-536.34.01
$ 100
Rent - Land
Automotive Ins.
Maint-Auto Eqmt.
Maint-Heavy Eqmt.
Maint-Structure
Except Bldgs.
SEP 2 41980
461-218-536.34.41
$
100
461-218-536-34.51
$
' 115
461-218-536-34.64
$
800
461-218-536-34.65
$
20
461-218-536-34.66
$
550
o� 44 FAR -DM
SEP 2 41980
September 18, 1989
Page Two
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
Maint-Other Eqmt.
461-218-536-34.69
All Office Supplies
461-218-536-35.11
Tires & Tubes
461-218-536-35.22
Other Operating
Supplies
461-218-536.35.29
Bad Debt -Water &
Sewer
461-218-536-36.51
Automotive
461-218-536-66.42
Heavy Eqmt. Wheel
461-218-536-66.43
Other Mach & Eqmt.
461-218-536-66.49
Dummy Expense
461-299-513-35.99
Expense -Prior Year
461-299-513-36.72
Water Sales
461-000-343.31.00
BOOK 44 PACE570
INCREASE DECREASE
$ 2,500
$ 360
$ 100
$ 1,000
$ 75
$ 500
$ 17,000
$ 400
$ 230
$ 270
$ 27,620
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
2145 14th Avenue
September 18. 1980
MEMO TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROMc JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - South County Utilities
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
The following budget amendment is necessary to set
up the allocation for the interest expense account for
the payment of interst on the Utility Bonds.
I recommend the following budget amendment to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
For Current
Operations 471-000-383-10.00 $ 15,040
Interest Debt
Service 471-219-533-77.21 $ 15,040
SEP 2 41980 BOOK 44 FADE 5.71
SEP 2 41980
aoolr 44 puf 572
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 18, 1980
MEMO TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - South IRC Water Taxing District
The following budget amendment is necessary to allocate the nec-
essary funds to the Other Professional Services account which has never
been budgeted.
I recommend the following budget amendment to be adopted as part
of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
Other Professional
Services 701-116-515-33.19 $ 9,210
Reserve for Cont-
ingencies 701-199-584-99.91 $ 9,210
JKB/ksg
a ® �
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR., Chairman
ALMA LEE LOY, Vice Chairman
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR.
R. DON DEESON
PATRICK B. LYONS
JACK G. JENNINGS, Administrator 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960
September 18, 1980
MEMO TO: 4�Z BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: f- JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE OFFICER
IN RE: Budget Amendment - Transfers Within the
Department
The following budget amendments are necessary to appropriate
the necessary funds to those underestimated expenditure accounts.
The necessary funds are being transferred from other accounts
within the same department which were overestimated.
I recommend the following budget amendments to be adopted
as part of the approval of funds:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
Expense - Budget
Clerk to Board
Office
001-300-581-99.93 $ 151,485
Salaries
001-300-512-11.12
$
113,977
Social Security
001-300-512-12.11
$
6,987
Retirement
001-300-512-12.12
$
10,372
Ins. Life & Health
001-300-512-12.13
$
8,124
Mileage
001-300-512-34.01
$
400
Per Diem
001-300-512-34.03
$
900
Legal Services
001-300-512-34.11
$
10800
Postage
001-300-512-34.21
$
100
Rent -Office Eqmt.
001-300-512-34.43
$
1,080
Automotive Ins.
001-300-512-34.51
$
400
SEP 2 41980 SON 44 PPE 573
SEP 2 41980
September 18, 1980
Page Two
ACCOUNT TITLE
Maint-Office Eqmt.
Outside Printing
Legal Ads
All Office Supplies
Fuel & Lubricants
Other Operating
Supplies
Books - Magazines
Dues -Membership
Meetings & Seminars
Expense -Budget Office
Salaries
Social Security
Retirement
Ins. Life & Health
Rent - Other Eqmt.
Mileage
Per Diem
Telephone
Other Communcations
Service
Postage
Other Transport Sery
Rent -Other Equipment
All Office Supplies
ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE
001-300-512-34.63
001-300-512-34.72
001-300-512-34.91
001-300-512-35.11
001-300-512-35.21
001-300-512-35.29
001-300-512-35.41
001-300-512-35.42
001-300-512-35.43
Data Processing
001-301-581-99.93 $ 155,936
001-301-513-11.12
001-301-513-12.11
001-301-513-12.12
001-301-513-12.13
001-301-513-33.49
001-301-513-34.01
001-301-513-34.03
001-301-513-34.11
001-301-513-34.19
001-301-513-34.21
001-301-513-34.29
001-301-513-34.49
001-301-513-35.11
BOOK 44 Phu 574
DECREASE
$ 500
$ 500
$ 1,000
$ 2,500
$ 1,200
$ 1,000
$ 55
$ go
$ 500
$ 68,360
$ 4.191
$ 6,221
$ 4,489
$ 2,000
$ 500
$ 1,000
$ 1,200
$ 240
$ 100
$ 1,000
$ 59,760
$ 5,500
® a �
September 18, 1980
Page Three
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
Other Operating ;
Supplies
001-301-513-35.29
$
100
Books -Magazines
001-301-513-35.41
$
75
Meetings & Seminars
001-301-513-35.43
$
1,200
Expense - Budget
Clerk Circuit Court
Office
001-309-516-99.93 $ 468,164
Salaries Executive
001-309-516-11.11
$
25,999
Salaries Regular
001-309-516-11.12
$303,799
Social Security
001-309-516-12.11
$
20,217
Retirement
001-309-516-12.12
$
30,012
Ins. Life & Health
001-309-516-12.13
$
21,689
Legal Services
001-309-516-33.11
$
1,000
Mileage
001-309-516-34.01
$
850
Per Diem
001-309-516-34.03
$
1,200
Telephone
001-309-516-34.11
$
9,000
Postage
001-309-516-34.21
$
10,000
Rent -Office Equipment
001-309-516-34.43
$
6,000
General Liability Ins.
001-309-516-34.53
$
350
Maint.-Office Eqmt.
001-309-516-34.63
$
7,500
Outside Printing
001-309-516-34.72
$
5,000
All Office Equipment
001-309-516-35.11
$
10,000
Other Operating Supplies001-309-516-35.29
$
6,000
Books - Magazines
001-309-516-35.41
$
100
Dues -Membership
001-309-516-35.42
$
900
Office Equipment
001-309-526-66.41
$
8,,548
SEP 2 41980 BooK 44 -PAGE' 575'
SEP 2 41980 Booz 44 PAcE 57s
September 18, 1980
Page Four
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
Refuse Disposal
Maint.Heavy Eqmt. 004-209-534-34.65 $ 1,000
Maint.Automotive Eqmt. 004-209-534-34.64 $ 11,000
Maint.Other Eqmt. 004-209-534-34.69 $ 1,400
Maint.Automotive Eqmt. 004-209-534-34.64 $ 1,400
Expendable Tools 004-209-534-35.26 $ 75
Tires & Tubes 004-209-534-35.22 $ 75
Other Operating Supplies004-209-534-35.29 $ 500
Tires & Tubes 004-209-534-35.22 $ 500
Utilities
Telephone 004-215-536-34.11 $ 10
Other Transport Serv. 004-215-536-34.29 $ 10
Other Communication
Service 004-215-536-34.19 $ 100
Other Transport Serv. 004-215-536-34.29 $ 100
Postage 004-215-536-34.21 $ 500
Other Transport Serv. 004-215-536-34.29 $ 500
Electric Service 004-215-536-34.31 $ 450
Other Utilitiy Service 004-215-536-34.39 $ 450
Water & Sewer Service 004-215-536-34.32 $ 10
Other Utility Service 004-215-536-34.39 $ 10
Automotive Insurance 004-215-536-34.51 $ 115
Other Utility Service 004-215-536-34.39 $ 115
Maint.Automotive Eqmt. 004-215-536-34.64 $ 500
Maint. Buildings 004-215-536-34.61 $ 500
B.C.C. Operations
Other Prof. Services 001-101-511-33.19 $ 10,000
Outside Auditors 001-101-511-33.21 $ 10,000
_ ® M
September 18, 1980
Page Five
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
Postage
001-101-511-34.21
$
50
Telephone
001-101-511-34.11
$ 50
Maint. Office Eqmt.
001-101-511-34.63
$
200
All Office Supplies
001-101-511-35.11
$ 200
Outside Printing
001-101-511-34.72
$
.1,000
Legal Ads
001-101-511-34.91
$ 1,000
Other Operating Supplies001-101-511-35.29
$
500
All Office Supplies
001-101-511-35.11
$ 500
Dues Membership
001-101-511-35.42
$
500
All Office Supplies
001-101-511-35.11
$ 500
County Attorney
Legal Services
001-102-514-33.11
$
5,000
Other Prof. Services
001-102-514-33.19
$ 5,000
Dues -Membership
001-102-514-35.42
$
50
All Office Supplies
001-102-514-35.11
$ 50
Other Mach & Eqmt.
001-103-519-66.49
$
300
Maint. Office Eqmt.
001-103-519-34.63
$ 300
Overtime
001-201-512-11.14
$
30
Workmen's Comp.
001-201-512-12.14
$ 30
Ins. Life & Health
001-201-512-12.13
$
700
Social Security
001-201-512-12.11
$ 700
Other Transport Serv.
001-201-512-34.29
$
100
_
Telephone
001-201-512-34.11
$ 100
Maint.Office Eqmt.
001-201-512-34.63
$
1,000
Telephone
001-201-512-34.11
$ 1,000
Outside Printing
001-201-512-34.72
$
200
SEP 2 41980 BOOK 44 PAGE 577
L___
SEP 2 41980
Bou 44 Fnu 578
September 18, 1980
Page Six
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE DECREASE
Telephone
001-201-512-34.11
$ 200
Books -Magazines
001-201-512-35.41
$ 150
All Office Supplies
001-201-512-35.11
$ 150
Personnel Office
Other Prof. Services
001-203-513-33.19
$ 500
Medical Services
001-203-513-33.12
$ 500
Maint. Auto Equipment
001-203-513-34.64
$ 10
Mileage
001-203-513-34.01
$ 10
Advertising Except
Legal
001-203-513-34.81
$ 900
Outside Printing
001-203-513-34.72
$ 900
All Current Chgs.
001-203-513-34.99
$ 1,635
Data Processing Svc.
001-203-513-34.94
$ 1,635
Dues - Memberships
001-203-513-35.42
$ 10
All Office Supplies
001-203-513-35.11
$ 10
Parks
Maint. Air Condion
001-210-572-34.62
$ 50
Maint. Building
001-210-572-34.61
$ 50
Maint. Heavy Eqmt.
001-210-572-34.65
$ 100
Maint. Auto Eqmt.
001-210-572-34.64
$ 100
Maint. Other Eqmt.
001-210-572-34.69
$ 150
Maint. Struct Except
Building
001-210-572-34.66
$ 150
License & Permits
001-210-572-34.97
$ 100
Maint. Struct Ex. Bldg.
001-210-572-34.66
$ 100
Other Oper. Supplies
001-210-572-35.29
$ 500
Institutional Supplies
001-210-572-35.25
$ 500
Other Buildings
102-210-572-66.29
$ 5,000
Other Imprvt. Ex Bldgs.
102-210-572-66.39
$ 5,000
September 18, 1980
Page Seven
TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
_ACCOUNT
Welfare
Institutional Supplies
001-211-564-35.25
$ 1,000
Medicine & Med Supplies
001-211-564-35.27
$ 1,000
All Office Supplies
001-213-523-35.11
$ 100
Other Operating Supp.
001-213-523-35.29
$ 100
Rent -Office Eqmt.
001-216-519-34.43
$ 50
Maint. Office Eqmt.
001-216-519-34.63
$ 50
Licenses & Permits
001-216-519-34.97
$ 100
Legal Ads
001-216-519-34.91
$ 100
Other Oper. Supplies,
001-216-519-35.29
$ 200
Fuel & Lubricants
001-216-519-35.21
$ 200
Bldg. Op. Courthouse
Electric Services
001-220-519-34.31
$ 5,000
Other Utility Service
001-220-519-34.39
$ 5.000
Expendable Tools
001-220-519-35.26
$ 50
Other Oper. Supplies
001-220-519-35.29
$ 50
Bldg. Admin.
All Office Supplies
001-221-519.35.11
$ 50
Expendable Tools
001-221-519-35.26
$ 50
Other Oper. Supplies
001-221-519-35.29
$ 50
Expendable Tools
001-221-519-35.26
$ 50.
Tax Collector
Other Insurance
001-400-513-34.59
$ 100
Legal Ads
001-400-513-34.91
$ 100
Maint. Offic Eqmt.
001-600-521-34.63
$ 200
Workmen's Comp.
001-600-521-12.14
$ 200
Supervisor of Elections
Books - Magazines
001-700-519-35.41
$ 100
All Office Supplies
00.1-700-519-35.11
$ 100
Dues -Membership
001-700-519-35.42
$ 100
All Office Supplies
001-700-519-35.11
$ 100
SEP 2 41980 Boa '44 KE 5°79
SEP 2 41980 Boa 44 PAcc 5,80
September 18, 1980
Page Eight
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
Circuit Court
Maint. Office Eqmt.
001-901-516-34.63
$ 250
Maint. Building
001-901-516-34.61
$
250
County Court
Legal Services
001-902-516-33.11.
$ 100
Other Prof. Services
001-902-516-33.19
$
100
County Jail
Maint. Buildings
001-906-523-34.61
$ 1,000
Maint. Other Eqmt.
001-906-523-34.69
$
1,000
Engineering Services
002-214-541-33.13
$ 250
Other Prof. Services
002-214-541-33.19
$
250
Licenses & Permits
002-214=541=34.97
$ 10
Other Current Chrgs
002-214-541-34.99
$
10
Recreation
Other Mach & Eqmt.
004-108-572-66.49
$ 100
Other Imprvts. Except
Buildings
004-108-572-66.39
$
100
Utilities
Outside Printing
004-215-536-34.72
$ 50
Inhouse Printing
004-215-536-34.71
$
50
Licenses & Permits
004-215-536-34.97
$ 5
Legal Ads
004-215-536-34.91
$
5
All Office Supplies
004-215-536-35.11
$ 50
Fuel & Lubricants
004-215-536-35.21
$
50
Tires & Tubes
004-215-536-35.22
$ 150
Fuel & Lubricants
004-215-536-35.21
$
150
Chemicals
004-215-536-35.23
$ 100
Fuel & Lubricants
004-215-536-35.21
$
100
Civil Defense
Other Buildings
102=208-525-66.29
$ 125
Other Mach & Eqmt.
102-208-525-66.49
$
125
SEP 2 41980
DECREASE
$ 25
$ 10,000
$ 11,000
$ 3,000
$ 1,000
$ 250
$ 250
$ 150
$ 200
$ 1,500
$ 3,000
$ 15,000
600! '44 PAA8* 1
September 18, 1980
Page Nine
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
Parks
Office Equipment
102-210-572-66.41
$ 25
Other Imprv. Except
Buildings
102-210-572-66.39
Automotive
102-210-572-66.42
$ 10,000
0th Imprv-Except Bldg.
102-210-572-66.39
Road and Bridge
Other Bldgs.
102-214-541-66.29
$ 11,000
Traffic Sig & Markers
102-214-541-66.44
Other Mach & Equipment
102-214-541-66.49
$ 3,000
Traffic Sig & Markers
102-214-541-66.44
Bldg. Op. Courthouse
Other Mach & Equipment
102-220-519-66.49
$ 1,000
Office Buildings
102-220-519-66.21
Postage
108-222-564-34.21
$ 250
Maint. Heavy Egmt.
108-222-564-34.64
Electric Services
106-222-564-34.31
$ 250
Maint. Heavy Eqmt.
108-222-564-34.64
Community Development
Books - Magazines
108-225-569-35.41
$ 150
All Office Supplies
108-225-569-35.11
Housing Authority
Books - Magazines
108-226-554-35.41
$ 200
All Office Supplies
108-226-554-35.11
Overtime
411-217-534-11.14
$ 1,500
All Office Supplies
411-217-534-35.11
Maint.Automotive Eqmt.
411-217-534-34.64
$ 3,000
Paving Material
411-217-534-35.31
Maint. Heavy Eqmt.
411-217-534-34.65
$ 15.000
' Paving Material
411-217-534-35-31
SEP 2 41980
DECREASE
$ 25
$ 10,000
$ 11,000
$ 3,000
$ 1,000
$ 250
$ 250
$ 150
$ 200
$ 1,500
$ 3,000
$ 15,000
600! '44 PAA8* 1
SEP 2 41980 Bow 44 mu 582
September 18, 1980
Page Ten
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
Expendable Tools
411-217-534-35.26
$ 500
All Office Supplies
411-217-534-35.11
$ 500
North County Utilities
Other Comm. Services
461-218-536-34.19
$ 100
Telephone
461-218-536-34.11
$ 100
Books -Magazines
461-218-536-35.41
$ 10
Dues -Membership
461-218-536-35.42
$ 10
Mileage
471-219-533-34.01
$ 100
Telephone
471-219-533-34-11
$ 100
Other Comm. Serv.
471-219-533-34.19
$ 100
Telehphone
471-219-533-34.11
$ 100
Water & Sewer Serv.
471-219-533-34.32
$ 35,000
Electric Services
471-219-533-34.31
$ 27,000
Garbage & Solid Waste
471-219-533-34.33
$ 8.000
Other Utility Services
471-219-533-34.39
$ 5,000
Garbage & Solid Waste
471-219-533-34.33
$ 5,000
Outside Printing
471-219-533-34.72'-
$ 50
Inhouse Printing
471-219-533-34.71
$ 50
All Office Supplies
471-219-533-35.11
$ 50
Other Oper. Supplies
471-219-533-35.29
$ 50
Fuel & Lubricants
471-219-533-35.21
$ 100
Chemicals
471-219-533-35.23
$ 100
Tires & Tubes
471-219-533-35.22
$ 150
Chemicals
471-219-533-35.23
$ 150
Other Imprvt. Except
Buildings
471-219-533-66.39
$ 3,000
Other Mach & Egmt.
471-219-533-66.49
$ 3,000
� ® r
s
�
�
September 18, 1980
Page Eleven
_ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
Supervisor of Elections
Ins. Life & Health
001-700-519-12.13
$
250
Telephone
001-700-519-34.11
$
250
Postage
001-700-519-34.21
$
4,000
Outside Printing
001-700-519-34.72
$
500
Legal Ads
001-700-519-34.91
$
10
All Office Supplies
001-700-519-35.11
$ 5,010
Road and Bridge
Maint. Buildings
002-214-541-34.61
$
5,000
Pipe & Culvert
002-214-541-35.32
$ 5,000
County Planning
Overtime
004-205-515=11.14
$ .
50
Workmen's Comp.
oo4-205-515-12.14
$ 50
Other Prof. Services
004-205-515-33.19
$
500
Other Cont: Services
004-205-515-33.49
$ 500
Telephone
004-205-515-34.11
$
150
Postage
004-205-515-34.21
$
50
Maint. Office Eqmt.
004-205-515-34.63
$
100
Rent Office Equipment
004-205-515-34.43
$ 300
Fuel & Lubricants
oo4-205-515-35.21
$
500
Dues & Memberships
004-205-515-35.42
$
600
All Office Supplies
oo4-205-515-35.11
$ 1,100
Building and Zoning
Postage
oo4-207-524-34.21
$
200
Overtime
004-207-524-11.14
$
300
Telephone
oo4-207-524-34.11
$ 500
Legal Ads
004-207-524-34.91
$
300
Maint. Office Eqmt.
004-207-524-34.63
$ 300
Books & Magazines
004-207-524-35.41
$
100
ea0 44 PAcE 583
SEP 2 41980 BOOK 44 PACE 584
September 18, 1980
Page Twelve
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
Dues - Membership
004-207-524-35.42
$
150
All Office Supplies
004-207-524-35.11
$ 250
Refuse Disposal
Overtime
004-209-534-11.14
$
5,000
Workmen's Comp.
004-209-534-12.14
$ 2,500
Garbage & Solid Waste
004-209-534-34.33
$ 2,500
Engineering Services
004-209-534-33.13
$
200
Other Prof. Services
004-209-534-33.19
$ 200
Other Cont:- Services
004-215-536-33.49
$
24,000
Other Prof. Services
004-215-536-33.19
$ 24.000
Unemployment Comp.
461-218-536-12.15
$
300
Overtime
461-218-536-12.14
$ 300
Rent Buildings
461-218-536-34.42
$
200
Maint. Buildings
461-218-536-34.61
$ 200
Rent -Other Eqmt.
461-218-536-34.49
$
100
Maint. Buildings
461-218-536-34.61
$ 100
Purchased Water
461-218-536-34.95
$
4,000
Water & Sewer Service
461-218-536-34.32
$ 4.000
Licenses & Permits
461-218-536-34.97
$
2 ,
Legal Ads
461-218-536-34.91
$ 2*"-
Maint. Auto Equipment
471-219-533-34.64
$
750
Maint. Heavy Equipment
471-219-533-34.65
$
20
Maint. Other Equipment
471-219-533-34.69
$
2,300
Purchased Water
471-219-533-34.95
$
89600
Licenses & Permits
471-219-533-34.97
$
2
Bad Debt-Water/Sewer
471-219-533-36.51
$
60
September 18, 1980
Page Thirteen
ACCOUNT TITLE
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
Expense Prior Year
471-299-513-36.72
$
1,200
Other Mach & Equipment
471-219-533-66.49
$ 12,932
Elections
All Office Supplies
001-103-519-35.11
$
350
Maint. Office Eqmt.
001-103-519-34.63
$ 350
Administrator Operations
Rent - Office Eqmt.
001-201-512-34.43
$
50
Maint. Auto Equipment
001-201-512-34.64
$ 50
Bldg. Op. Courthouse
Maint. Other Equipment
001-220-519-34.69
$
40
Maint. Air Condition
001-220-519-34.62
$ 40
Other Imprvt. Except
Buildings
102-220-519-66.39
$
1,000
Office Buildings
102-220-519-66.21
$ 1,000
North County Utilities
Automotive Insurance
461-218-536-34.51
$
120
Maint. Building
461-218-536-34.61
$ 120
South County Utilities
Automotive Insurance
471-219"533-34.51
$
120
Maint. Building
471-219-533-34.61
$ 120
Welfare
Social Security
001-211-564-12.11
$
250
Ins. Life & Health
001-211-564-12.13
$ 250
Building Permits
004-000-322.10.00
$
15,000
City of Vero Beach
004-104-522-88.11
$
15,000
BOOK- PAGE 5x85
SEP 2 41980
L
r
SEP 2 4198Q
0:01imim
8004( 44 PACE M6
THE BOARD THEN REVIEWED THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND
THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE AND
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT IN PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, THE WORD "PENINSULAR" SHOULD BE CORRECTED
TO "PENINSULA."
MARVIN CARTER, CHAIRMAN OF THE INDIAN RIVER SOIL & WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND ADVISED THAT HE HAD
REVIEWED THE SUBJECT DOCUMENTS WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR
THOMAS, AND THE ATTORNEY HAS ALSO REVIEWED THEM. HE REFERRED
TO PARAGRAPH D OF THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, AND:ADVISED THAT $75,000
WOULD BE THE TOP FIGURE; THE MAP IS NOT TO EXCEED THE FIGURE SHOWN
AND IT MAY EVEN COME OUT TO BE LESS THAN THAT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AND
AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE.'MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN.
� 6m i
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
among the
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
the
MDIAN RIVER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
the
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS
and the
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Re: Acceleration of the Soil Survey in Indian River
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 24th day ofSeptember 198a-,
by and among the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (herein-
after called the "Cooperator"), the Indian River Soil and Water Conservation
District (hereinafter called the "District") and ,jointly with the University
of Florida acting by and through the Florida Aricultural Experiment Stations
and the United States of America acting by and through the United States
Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (hereinafter called the
"Agencies").
THE COOPERATOR, for planning purposes, having requested certain soil survey
information that is presently unavailable, is willing to reimburse the
Agencies for a portion of the costs of obtaining such information within
the period specified in this agreement upon receipt of a properly prepared
billing.
THE DISTRICT, has need for basic soils information to carry out its assigned
responsibility under State law to promote the improvement and protection
of the soil and water resources of Indian River County.
THE AGENCIES, in carrying out their responsibilities under applicable legisla-
tion, have need for information that may be obtained as a result of this
cooperation but do not have sufficient resources available to do the work
within the period of this Agreement.
THEREFORE, the Cooperator, the District and the Agencies deem it mutually
advantageous to cooperate in this undertaking and hereby agree as follows:
1. THE COOPERATOR AGREES:
A. That all information obtained under terms of this agreement is public
property, and is necessary for adequate comprehensive planning by the
county.
B. To provide the priority of the areas to be surveyed in the county.
C, To provide funds to reimburse the Agencies for a portion of the costs
incurred in the acceleration and publication of the soil survey to
include:
Boa 44 PAGE 587
SEP 241980
SEP 2 41980
Boa 44 PArF 588
1. Technical services of personnel - including costs of salaries and
allied benefits.
2. Clerical and typing services including -material costs, salaries,
and personnel benefits.
3. Services, supplies and equipment for characterization, classifica-
tion, correlation, and interpretation of soils.
4. Transportation of employees to sites throughout the area of the
survey.
5. Map compilation and finishing for the published soil survey by
,the Soil Conservation Service,
D. To reimburse the Agencies for a portion of the cost of complete
soil survey in an amount not to exceeda
cost is estimated to be one-third the actual field cost of the survey
and is arrived at as follows:
Total acres in county - 3279000
Acres mapped to date - 27,000
Acres remaining to map - 300,000
Total field cost of survey = 300,000 acres x $.75 per acre = $225,000
The field work is estimated to be completed in 4 years from the date
mapping begins, cost -to the county of $18,750. $15,000 payable to the
Soil Conservation Service and $3,750 to the Florida Agricultural
Experiment Stations each year. Work to begin in fiscal year 1981
(October 1980 to September 1981), contingent on availability of
manpower.
Costs are estimated on a per acre basis to arrive at approximate costs
to complete the survey and to determine the amount to be funded by the
agencies. Actual costs are variable. The county will be billed for
actual work performed in the amounts not to exceed the figures shown
in ''D" above.
Payments to the Agencies will be made on receipt of bill from the
separate agencies covering work done quarterly at the close of the
months of March, June, September, and December.
E. That the signature of the authorized representative of the Cooperator
on this agreement is official notice for the work to begin.
2. THE DISTRICT AGREES:
A. To serve as overall coordinator of the soil survey among the agencies.
B. To assist and coordinate a training program to inform the public, local
agencies, and others about the use of soil information.
C. To provide leadership in an information program to inform the public
on the conduct of the survey.
C�
D. To work with the agencies to insure the continued funding of the
survey through it's completion, including the mapping, laboratory
work and preparation of the manuscript report.
E. To utilize soils information in carrying out it's responsibilities
in the -application of soil and water conservation measures in the
county.
3. THE AGENCIES AGREE:
& To furnish the necessary professional personnel, transportation,
equipment, and supplies to conduct a detailed soil survey and to
prepare and publish the report in the regular USDA Series.
B. To furnish the necessary professional personnel, transportation,
and laboratory facilities to collect and characterize the more
important soils through a coordinated program of research on their
physical, chemical, and mineralogical properties.
C. To furnish the necessary professional personnel, transportation,
and equipment to collect and submit samples of selected soils to
laboratories of the Florida Department of Transportation for
special tests.
D. To provide the necessary technical services, on-site assistance,
equipment, and materials normally needed to produce, edit, and
compile a soil survey for publication.
E. To make available to -the Cooperator, in preliminary form the result of
surveys, investigations, and interpretations as soon after completion
of the field work as practicable.
F. To provide the Cooperator with copy(ies) of each complete soil survey
field sheet as soon after completion as practical. Additional copies
within reason will be made available to county agencies and others
as requested.
G. To provide the Cooperator with periodic reports on the results of the
laboratory work and a final report summarizing the research completed.
H. To delineate their separate responsibilities under this Agreement
relative to kind and amount of work to be done and division of funds
available from the Cooperator. Details of these decisions will be
stated in a separate instrument between the Service and the Stations.
I. To absorb from their own appropriations that portion of the estimated
costs of this undertaking not covered by the amount to be reimbursed
the Agencies by the Cooperator.
4. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
A. Intent to Cooperate: It is the intent of the Cooperator and Agencies
to fulfill all obligations of this Agreement. However, commitments
cannot be made beyond the period for which funds have been made
available. In the event funds from which either the Cooperator or
SEP 2 41980 Boa 44 PAcE589
. J
I
SEP 2 41980 Boa 44 PdrE500
the agencies may need to fulfill their obligations are not available,
this Agreement will automatically terminate. Reimbursement gill then
be for work completed that is otherwise eligible for reimbursement
prior to the effective date of termination.
B. Renewals: -This Agreement will remain -'in force until September 30, 1981..
It may be affirmatively renewed each fiscal year by the parties through
an exchange of correspondence until the purposes of the Agreement are
complete -- but not later than the end of the fiscal year in which the
work is completed.
C. Modification: This Agreement may be modified by amendment duly
executed by authorized officials of the Cooperator and the Agencies,
provided such modification does not extend the Agreement beyond the
close of the fiscal year in which the work is completed.
D. Area Covered::' All of Indian River County.
E. Method of Payment: The Agencies will separately bill the Cooperator
quarterly according to a schedule acceptable to the Cooperator,
provided that the total of such billing shall not exceed the amount
herein agreed to.
F. Completion Date: It is the intent of the parties to this Agreement
to complete the soil survey and prepare the draft report manuscript
within a period of 4 years. In the event completion is delayed
unavoidably, no claim for further financial participation will be
made against the Cooperator.
G. Officials Not to Benefit: No members of our delegate to Congress or
Resident Commissioner shall be admitted to any share or part of this
Agreement, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom; but this
provision shall not be construed to extend to this Agreement if made
with a corporation for its general benefit.
M
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Cooperator, the Service, and the Station have
executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
By J
Anthony F. R dazzo
Associate Dean for Researc
Division of Sponsored Research
SEP 2 41980
INDIAN �Ifift SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATON DI ICT t :'.,
r
i tl e) Ch*1l?^ym
FLORIDA'RICULTURAL EXPER MENT STATIONS
By
Dean for Research
UNITED STATES DEPAR-MENT OF A TURE
SOIL CONSEERVATION SERVICE
By tX
State Conservationist
Service Authority: PL 46 - 74th Congress,
16 U.S.C. (590 a -f)
BOOK 44 -PAIGE 59'1'
.-ft
SEP 2 41980
saox 44 PAcF 592
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE SOIL SURVEY
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH
THE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE,
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
AND AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES,
INDIAN RIVER SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
AND
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
RELATIVE TO
MAKING A SOIL SURVEY IN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA (#061)
Purpose of Doinq the Work._ The purpose of this soil survey is to provide basic
soils data for multipurpose planning in Indian River County. A reconnaissance
survey was prepared in 1913 of a narrow strip along the Indian River which is
out of print and inadequate for modern planning purposes, nor does it meet
current standards of the National Cooperative Soil Survey.
Description of the Area
- Indian River County is located on the Atlantic Coast in the central
portion of the Florida peninsula.. It is bounded by Brevard County on the north,
Osceola and Okeechobee on the west and St. Lucie and Okeechobee Counties on the
south. The county occurs within the southern Florida flatw oods and the southern
Florida lowlands major land resource areas. Elevations range from sea level to
about 60 feet in the western part of the county.
The major soil landscapes in the county consist of the coastal beach and
dunes between the Atlantic Ocean and the Indian River and the well drained sandy
ridge on the west side of the Indian River running north and south across the
county. The large St. Johns marsh and Lake Wilmington area occupy approximately
60,000 acres in the west central part of the county. This area, which consists
of organic and very poorly drained mineral soils, forms the upper reaches of the
St. Johns River watershed. The landscape to the east and west of the St. Johns
marsh consists of acid and sweet flatwoods with shallow depressions and sloughs
throughout the area. Soils are primarily spodosols.
The eastern portion of the county is undergoing rapid land use changes,
primarily to urban development. Vero Beach is the county seat and the largest
city in the county.
The major agricultural industry in the county consists of citrus and cattle
production, with some tomatoes and melons also produced.
- Size. Land area - 351,000
(1970 Census) Water area - 27,000
Total area - 378,000
Cooperating Agencies and Responsibilities.
- Soil Conservation _Service shall provide technical staff to conduct the
survey. The Service will also provide the equipment, supplies, transportation,
and new base photos for the survey. Additionally, the Service will provide the
r
e
L--]
necessary quality control to insure the survey meets the standards of the
National Cooperative Survey, and will assume the responsibility for map
compilation, finishing, and publication.
- University of Florida Soil Science Department will provide laboratory
characterization data as nee ed for proper classification and interpretation.
The University will provide the funds and manpower for sampling, laboratory
characterization, and preparation of data reports. They will also prepare the
section relating to the "physical, chemical, and mineralogical analysis of
selected soils" for the report manuscript.
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services through the
state soil and water office, provide state leaders ip for the acceleration of
the soil survey in the state. Working with the Florida Association of
Conservation Districts and other interested groups and agencies including the
Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District seek continued support and
funding from the state legislature to complete the survey in the state of
Florida.
- Indian River Soil and Water Conservation District will generate local
support and publicity for the survey and will take leadership in distribution
of soils information locally. Additionally, they will work with the Indian
River County Board of Commissioners to provide local funding in support of the
survey. Financial arrangements for funding will be spelled out in a separate
agreement among the agencies. They will work with the county to identify
priority areas for mapping.
Indian River Board of County Commissioners will provide funds in
accordance witn a separate cooperative agreement among the agencies to do the
soil survey in Indian River County. They will also assist in an information
program to inform the public as to the availability as well as uses of soil
survey information. In addition, the county will use soils information in
making land use decisions to protect the public interest and welfare in the
county.
Specification.
- Base Imagery. The soil survey will be compiled on 1980 photography
obtained by the Service for the soil survey. Publication scale will be 1:20,000.
Map compilation and finishing will be ajoint effort between the soil survey
party and the map compilation staff in the State Office. Field parties will be
responsible for adequate joining and checking of completed atlas sheets before
they are turned over to cartographic technicians for finishing.
- Field Procedures. Mapping will be done by conventional field procedures.
The soils in each delineation will be identified by direct field examination.
Minimum size delineation of contrasting soils will be about three acres.
Systematic transect procedures will be used as necessary to supplement data on
composition of mapping units. Adequate descriptions and field notes will be
made during the course of the survey to substantiate the name of each .map unit
and to establish the range of characteristics of each of the named soil.
Mapping legend and descriptive legend will be developed as the survey progresses
and will be kept current at all times in accordance with state policies.
SEP 2 41980
Boa 44 PAcE 593
a
SEP 2 41980
Time. The field
from the starting
CASPUSS schedule.
providing a guide
survey manuscrip
twork will begin in FY81 and will
date. Critical scheduling dates
A time table will be developed
to scheduling and completing the
and supporting documentation.
soon 44 PAGE 594
be completed in four years
will be maintained using the
at the initial review
various sections of the soil
Publication. The SCS party leader has responsibility for preparing the report
manuscript. The manuscript will be in accordance with current format and
procedures outlined in the National Soil Handbook. The party leader, working
through the Area Conservationist, will be responsible for obtaining necessary
assistance for preparing the woodland section, use and management section,
wildlife section, and engineering section of the report manuscript. Specialist
assistance will be scheduled throughout the course of the survey so that the
various sections are completed when mapping is complete. The soil handbook
will be kept current at all times and will be in the format for published soil
surveys. The general soil map will also be developed as the survey progresses.
Sign:
Name
State Conservationist,
Soil Conservation Service
Dean for Research, IFAS,
University of Florida
griculture
Ana rrmay inalan Klver county 5oii and
Water C nservation D'strict
Chairman, I dian River County of
County Commissioners
Date
September 24, 1980
M
CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
FOR SUBSTITUTION, AS REQUESTED BY CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR FOR THE
PURCHASE OF A CASSETTE RECORDER AND A SLIDE PROJECTOR FOR USE IN
TRAINING VOLUNTEERS, THIS SUBSTITUTION IS FOR THE PURCHASE OF
ALTERNATE EQUIPMENT WHICH HAD BEEN BUDGETED FOR.
OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL - UTILITY DIRECTOR
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR
UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER TO THE 54TH ANNUAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE,
OCTOBER 28-30, 1980, AT THE HOLIDAY INN, ORLANDO, FLORIDA.
SEP 2 41990
15 BOOK 44 brE 595
SEP 2 41980 Boox 44 PArE 596
PUBLIC HEARING- REZONING FROM R-1 TO R -2B REQUESTED BY EDWARD P.
LEWIS, AS TRUSTEE - CONTINUED
THE HOUR OF 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a -I,✓ .:/ -, —
in the matter of
in the
lished in said newspaper in the issues of .2
Court, was pub-
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before this day of A.D.
,
Cn
_ (Business Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Cot , Indian River County, Florida)
(SEAL)
NOTICE v
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN .that the
Planning and Zoning Commission of Indian=
River County, Florida, has tentatively ap-
proved the following changes and additions to
the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County,,
Florida, which changes and additions are
substantially as follows:-
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property situated
in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit:
All of 'Government Lot ---T, Section `36,
Township 31 South, Range 39 East, EXCEPT
one acre in the Northeast corner thereof,
described as follows: Begin on the bank or
bluff of the Atlantic Ocean on the North line of
said Government Lot 1, thence run West 209
feet; thence South 209 feet; thence East 209
feet to. the bank or bluff of the Atlantic Ocean;
I{ thence run northerly along said bank or bluff to
the Point of Beginning; ALSO EXCEPT the
North 15 feet of said Government Lot 1, and
ALSO EXCERTING the right-of-way for State
Road A -1-A as described in Deed recorded in
Official Record Book 35, Page 393, etc., Public
Records of Indian River County, Florida. '
ALSO EXCEPTING the South 70 feet of
Government Lot T as measured on the per-
pendicular to the South Line of said property
(which is the South line of said Government
Lot 1) lying Easterly of the Easterly right -of=
I way of state Road A -1-A.
Be changed from R -l. Single' Family
Residential-. to R-26 Multiple , Family
Residential District.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which.
parties in. interest and citizens shall'have an
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
Planning and Zoning Commission in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall of Vero
Beach, Fla., Vero Beach, Florida, Thursday,
August 14, 1980, at 7:30 p.m., after which said
.public hearing in relation thereto at whkh
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity -to be heard will be held by the
Board of County Commissioners of • Indian
River County, Florida, in the Council Cham-
bers.of the Vero Beach City Hall, Vero Beach,
Florida, on Wednesday, September 24, 1980, at
9:00 A.M.
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
By: Willard W. Siebert, Jr.;
Chairman
Indian River County Planning
& Zoning Commission _
Ely: Dick Bird, Chairman
July 23, 25,1980.
NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO EDWARD D. LEWIS,
AS TRUSTEE, BY THE CLERK OF THE COURT, AS REQUIRED BY FLA.STAT. 125.66.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER APPROACHED THE BOARD AND ADVISED
THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1-1/2 MILES SOUTH
OF S.R. 510, EAST AND WEST OF A -1—A, AND NORTH OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES;
IT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 30 ACRES. HE ADDED THAT THE APPLICATION
IS IN ORDER AND HAS BEEN HEARD BEFORE THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AND THEY RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF THE REQUEST, ON A VOTE OF 3 TO 1.
16
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER STATED THE PLANNING STAFF FELT
THIS PROPERTY WAS SIMILAR TO THE SEA OAKS PROPERTY TO THE NORTH -
IT FELL UNDER THE SAME RESTRAINTS, CONDITIONS, DRAWBACKS, WATER
PROBLEMS AND THE SAME TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. HE ADDED THAT THE PLAN
IS IN KEEPING WITH THE KIND OF DEVELOPMENT THE COUNTY WOULD LIKE TO
PLACE THERE IN THE FUTURE - THE CLUSTER TYPE. PLANNING DIRECTOR
REVER STATED THE PROBLEM THAT EXISTS TODAY IS THAT THE R-1 IS VERY
STRUCTURED AND ONLY PERMITS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING. HE CONTINUED THAT
S UNITS PER ACRE IS NOT FEASIBLE, AND THAT 6 OR A LITTLE BIT LESS
WOULD BE MORE FEASIBLE DENSITY PER ACRE; THIS WOULD BE IN KEEPING
WITH THE DENSITY RECENTLY CONSIDERED IN THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN. MR. REVER STATED THAT HIS STAFFS RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THIS
REQUEST SHOULD BE APPROVED.
ATTORNEY STEVE HENDERSON, REPRESENTING RICHARD SCHAUB, AND
EDWARD D. LEWIS, TRUSTEE, OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY, CAME BEFORE THE
BOARD AND DISCUSSED THE AERIAL MAP OF THE SUBJECT AREA. HE ADDED
THAT THE MAJOR ISSUE THEY CONFRONTED AT THE PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
WAS THAT THEY WERE LOOKING FOR A CHANGE OF USE AND NOT A CHANGE OF
DENSITY. MR. HENDERSON SAID THE PROJECT CALLS FOR A DENSITY OF 3.5
UNITS PER ACRE WEST OF A -1-A, AND A DENSITY OF 6.06 UNITS PER ACRE
EAST OF A -1-A, HE CONTINUED THAT THEY INTEND TO BUILD A PROJECT OF
ONLY 4.8 UNITS AND IN ORDER FOR THEM TO ACCOMPLISH THIS, THE BOARD
MUST GIVE THEM A ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF S. MR. HENDERSON COMMENTED
THAT THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO CHANGE THEIR APPLICATION TO R -2A WEST
OF A -1-A, AND R -2B EAST OF A -1-A, GIVING THE BOARD A CAP ON THE DENSITY,
DICK SCHAUB, OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD
TO ADVISE THAT HE WOULD BE THE DEVELOPER -BUILDER ON THE PROPOSED
SITE. HE INTRODUCED HIS SON AND PARTNER, RICK SCHAUB; ALSO HIS OTHER
SON AND ARCHITECT, CLEM SCHAUB. MR. SCHAUB CONTINUED THAT HE HAS
BEEN DOING THIS TYPE OF WORK SINCE 1947 IN INDIANA, MICHIGAN, ILLINOIS,
ALABAMA, PUERTO RICO AND FLORIDA. HE THEN PASSED OUT BROCHURES OF
PROJECTS IN DOWNTOWN PENSACOLA TO THE BOARD.
17
SEP 2 41980
E l
BO'K 44-- w
SEP 2 41980 eooK 44 'PACE
598
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE MINUTES FROM THE PLANNING
& ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CONFLICT OF FIGURES IN THE DENSITY.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT HIS INTENT HAS BEEN CHANGED
SINCE THAT MEETING.
RICK SCHAUB CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND ADVISED THAT THEIR
PLAN FOR THE EAST SIDE of A -1-A HAS NOT CHANGED - IT IS STILL 6.06
UNITS PER ACRE; BUT THE WEST SIDE OF A -1-A HAS CHANGED TO 3.5 UNITS
PER ACRE. HE ALSO ADVISED THAT THEY HAVE PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS.
CLEM SCHAUB APPROACHED THE BOARD AND EXPLAINED THE PROJECT
SKETCH TO THE BOARD, NOTING THAT THEY WILL BE STAYING LOW RISE, WITH
A MAXIMUM OF THREE STORIES. HE ADDED THAT THE BUILDINGS WILL BE
ELEVATED ON PILES 4' HIGH, AND ANY WAVE ACTION WILL GO UNDER THE
BUILDINGS. MR. SCHAUB STATED THAT THE BUILDINGS WILL BE CONNECTED
BY BREEZEWAYS; EVERYONE WILL HAVE AN EAST AND WEST EXPOSURE; PARKING
WILL BE SITUATED IN THE BACK; AND THE DENSITY, FOR 84 UNITS, COMES OUT
TO 6.06 UNITS PER ACRE. HE CONTINUED THAT THE EXISTING VEGETATION
WOULD REMAIN; THE APPROXIMATE OCEAN FRONTAGE IS 1387', AND THE UNITS
WILL VARY IN SIZE UP TO 2100 SQUARE FEET. MR. SCHAUB EXPLAINED THE
PLANS FOR THE WEST SIDE OF A-1-A,WHICH WOULD BE A CLUSTER OF PATIO
HOMES OF 6 TO S UNITS; EACH HOME WOULD HAVE THEIR OWN SWIMMING POOL,
AND THE DENSITY WOULD BE 3.5 UNITS PER ACRE. HE COMMENTED THAT THE
BUILDINGS WILL BE SLIGHTLY ELEVATED ON RAISED FOOTINGS, AND EXISTING
VEGETATION WILL BE KEPT ALONG THE PERIPHERY.
WAYNE KAISER, OF EDWARD D. STONE & ASSOCIATES, COMMENTED
ABOUT THE LANDSCAPING PLAN OF THE PROJECT. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
THE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE EAST SIDE of A -1-A IS TO PRESERVE THE
EXISTING VEGETATION AND TRY TO SCREEN OUT ANY OF THE BUILDINGS. MR.
KAISER ADVISED THAT ALONG THE DUNES, THEY PLAN TO PRESERVE THE TREES,
MOVE OTHER TREES OUT OF THE WAY OF CONSTRUCTION AND THEN MOVE THEM
BACK; THEY ARE INTERESTED IN USING THE NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS TO KEEP
THE AREA JUST AS NATURAL AS THEY CAN.
KING HELIE, OF HUDSON, FLORIDA, AND WHO HAS BEEN RETAINED
TO ASSIST WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD. HE
18®
NOTED THAT THERE IS A HIGH DEMAND OF PEOPLE WHO WANT TO LIVE ON THE
WATER, AND SINCE THERE ARE BRIDGES, THERE IS GOOD ACCESS, MR. HELIE
NEXT DISCUSSED THE BEARING CAPACITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND - THE NUMBER
OF PEOPLE CAN BE DETERMINED BUT MUST BE BASED ON TRANSPORTATION
AND POTABLE WATER. HE ADVISED THERE IS A VEIN OF WATER AT THIS
LOCATION WITH REVERSE OSMOSIS, AND POTABLE WATER IS PROBABLY AVAILABLE.
MR. HELIE STATED THAT THE OWNERS WANT TO PUT DOWN A TEST WELL. HE
COMMENTED THAT ON A BARRIER ISLAND, THERE IS A LIMITING FACTOR TO
GROWTH. MR. HELIE NOTED THAT WHEN YOU GET A ZONING CHANGE, IT JUST
GIVES THE DEVELOPER MORE ASSURANCE TO GO AHEAD AND SPEND MORE MONEY.
HE ADDED THAT THIS PROJECT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE TRAFFIC FLOW
ON A -1-A.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD HAS BEEN
INVOLVED IN THIS PARCEL BEFORE - THE OLD ENOS SUBDIVISION.
.JOHN ROBBINS, ENGINEER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND NOTED
THAT RELATIVE TO THE WATER ISSUE, REVERSE OSMOSIS WOULD BE THE ONLY
WAY. HE CONTINUED THAT RELATIVE TO THE SEWAGE TREATMENT IN THAT AREA,
SOMETHING ALONG THE LINES OF A SECONDARY TREATMENT, WITH AN EFFLUENT
TECHNIQUE OF PERCOLATION OR SUBSURFACE PERCOLATION, WOULD BE VIABLE.
MR. ROBBINS STATED THERE IS A PROCEDURE THAT THE PETITIONERS MUST GO
THROUGH UNDER THE FRANCHISE REQUIREMENTS, AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL
COULD NOT PROCEED UNTIL UTILITY APPROVAL WAS RECEIVED; THERE ARE
VARIOUS REGULATORY AGENCIES THAT WOULD HAVE TO GIVE THEIR APPROVAL -
THESE ARE AREAS THE PETITIONERS WILL HAVE TO ADDRESS. MR. ROBBINS
COMMENTED THAT FROM AN ENGINEERING STANDPOINT, THIS WOULD REQUIRE A
CLOSE LOOK SO THAT CERTAIN BUFFERS ARE THERE; THAT RESPONSIBILITY
LIES WITH THE DER IN THEIR REQUIREMENTS, BUT THE ENGINEERING WOULD
HAVE TO BE DONE TO INSURE THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE MET.
COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT THE QUESTION OF WATER
AND SEWER IS SOMETHING THAT IS WELL UNDER CONTROL BY THE EXISTING
AGENCIES.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON ADVISED THAT THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN,BUT IT IS TO BE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
PROPERTY, AND WEST OF A -1-A.
19 SOAK f
SEP 2 4 1980 'A
SEP 2 4 1980
Banc 44 PAGE -600
CLEM SCHAUB ADVISED THAT THEY HAVE ALLOWED OVER AN ACRE
AND A HALF FOR UTILITIES. HE ADDED THAT THE EFFLUENCE WILL BE
TREATED TO 95% AND THEN PERCOLATED INTO THE GROUND.
.JOHN ROBBINS INTERJECTED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO LOOK AT
PERCOLATION PONDS OR SOME FORM OF SUBSURFACE POND; HE DID NOT THINK
THAT DISCHARGE INTO THE RIVER WOULD BE THE METHOD TO USE AT ALL. HE
CONCLUDED THAT FROM AN ENVIRONMENTAL STANDPOINT, HE WOULD NOT RECOMMEND
DISCHARGE INTO THE RIVER.
DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT CAN BE
BUILT PER ACRE IN VARIOUS TYPES OF ZONING.
COMMISSIONER LYONS STRESSED THAT HE WANTED TO BE SURE THAT
WHATEVER NUMBERS ARE ARRIVED AT, THEY KNOW THE DENSITY, IN WRITING,
BEFORE ANY CHANGE IS MADE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE NORTH 15' MENTIONED IN THE
PLANNING & ZONING MINUTES, WHICH THE PETITIONERS DO NOT OWN,
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHED
TO BE HEARD.
MARGARET BOWMAN, PRESIDENT OF THE PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON
SOCIETY, READ THE FOLLOWING ALOUD TO THE BOARD:
My name is Margaret Bowman, President of Pelican Island
Audubon Society. We have reviewed this application. Prelim-
inary plans and aspirations of the applicant and his staff
appear to be the sort of quality development that would be
highly desirable and welcome in Indian River Cou ty if we
had the proper zoning category for 6 units multi�le-T—amily,
and if we had sewerage and water facilities that would preclude
the use of package plants. Hence our opposition to this re-
zoning at this time is not for the reason that we oppose this
development concept, but because we believe any rezoning and
development in this part of the Barrier Island is highly
premature.
Any rezoning that increases the density of people on this
barrier island is foolhardy and ultimately may be extremely
costly to every taxpayer in Indian River County.
We cannot be myopic, and ignore the fact that sea level is
rising at a rate of a foot a century. Presently this sea
level rise is causin shoreline retreat of 50 to 200 feet a
century on average. Dept. of Interior).
The federal government has spent millions of taxpayer dollars
redeveloping areas clearly not suited for development in the
first place. Already 14% of our island space is considered
urban as oppsed to only 3jo of the mainland. The federal
government will not be able to bear the costs indefinitely of
rebuilding in high risK areas.
Barrier Islands Bill, S-2686, last week was reported out of the
Senate Environment and public Works Committee. Senate floor
action is expected soon. The bill designates undeveloped barrier
islands and undeveloped portions of developed barrier islands
where the bill will cut off all federal expenditures, financing,
licensing, and permits. This particular portion of the Vero Beach
barrier island is one of the units specifically listed in this
bill, meaning that any developments will not qualify for federl
funding nor permits for water and sewer plants , pipelines,
roads, flood insurance on buildings constructed after May 1980,
disaster loans, beach restoration, etc.... the whole gamut of
federal subsidies that have enabled excessive development in
such areas/ When the County ultimately includes this barrier
island area in a County water and sewer district, the local
taxpayer would have to assume the total cost.
We now have enough bridgesto handle emergency evacuation of our
current population before a hurricane strikes. (Keep in mind
that the low level approaches to the Wabasso bridge.may be under
water before the storm hits.) but we should point out that you
have seen the last new bridge crossing the Indian River, or for
that matter any body of water between the mainland and a farrier
island in the state of Florida. In the future we can expect
reduced state funding and permits also.
Where does the County ommission fit into this icture? Obvios-
ly you must consider the the of any repZoning decisions
not only for those who stand to gain financially from the
rezoning, but also for the people who will be living on the
site. and for the rest of the county's citizens who will have
to bear the burden of providing community services and emergency
bailouts.
For problems of erosion, flooding, water and sewerage, the use
of non-structural solutions such as zoning, site restrictions,
and performance standards is much preferred to the use of
structural solutions Consider the tragedies now waiting to
happen along the beach in Vero Beach city. There is not a
doubt that one of these days a hurricane or a northeaster is
going to destroy one or more of those buildings that now sit on
the edge of the ocean. It is not a matter of "if" but "when".
The cost is going to be tremendous.
Clearly we see today that it would have been far less coxtly
to have required a wide setback between the beach and the structure.
.A large amount of money and energy has already gone into protect-
ing these buildings. 14hen a storm comes we will all pay.
Today there is not much of the primary dune system reamining in
the north end of the county. In the past five or six years we
have lost 20 to 30 feet. Who is so naive to think that any
developer will back off voluntarily 100 to 200 feet, and not
develop that portion of his beachfront property?
We must Keep in mind that in the absence,of a major sewer line
to a regional plant, the �.evelopers will provide a spwer package
plant. Every such private plant ultimately becomes publicly
owned and paid for. Usually it ends up being closed down as the
transmission lines come in fron the regional sewer facility..
But this time, remember, we may not have federal or state fund s
and the county taxpayers will have to pick up the tab.
Before you seel yourselves on the adequacy of a package treat-
ment plant, consider that treatment facilities and holding ponds
should not be built on the island unless they can be constructted
above the 100 -year flood plain. Where is that elevation on the
arrier island? I think you will find it is back on the mainland
somewhere.
The natural fresh water supply of this part of the island is
a thin lens usupended on top of salt water. It is already known
that this supply under present development pressure is precarious,
and almost non-existent during the dry season. Deep well explor-
ation recently conducted by Johns Island and several residents
of Indian River Shores and Summerplace, indicate that volume and
quality of water is extremely low, and the salinity of the water
nearly matches the salinity of the Indian River. SO -OK 44 PA61•601
SEP 241980
SEP 2 41990 Bum 44 QAcf,602
Rezoning today to the proposed density is premature and poses a
host of problems, real and potential, that cannot be solved on
a development by developMerTt basis. I Urge you to be prudent
today so that our options for protection and Wise use of This
fragile area remain open. Thank you.
ED NOLAN, MAYOR OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, APPROACHED THE
BOARD TO POINT OUT THE IMPACT THAT A DEVELOPMENT OF THIS NATURE WOULD
HAVE ON INDIAN RIVER SHORES HE CONTINUED THAT WE, IN VERO BEACH,
HAVE ONE OF THE MOST IDEAL PLACES AND HE DOES NOT WANT TO SEE OUR
BEACHES DESTROYED BY LACK OF PLANNING. MAYOR NOLAN REFERRED TO A
REPORT MADE BY JOHN CURTIN, A TRANSPORTATION EXPERT, WHICH RELATES
WHAT MAY HAPPEN IF THE DENSITY IMPACT IS -NOT CONSIDERED NORTH OF
INDIAN RIVER SHORES. HE THEN BEGGED THE BOARD TO RECONSIDER ANYTHING
CONCERNING DENSITY UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT AN AGENCY CAN DO AN UNBIASED
STUDY TO DECIDE THE DENSITY, AND WHAT OUR TRANSPORTATION ARTERIES
COULD CARRY. MAYOR NOLAN STATED THAT THE DER DOES NOT RECOMMEND
PACKAGE PLANTS, AND SUGGESTED THE BOARD DECLARE A MORATORIUM.
NORMAN BADENHOP, 4601 SUNSET DRIVE, APPROACHED THE BOARD
AND STATED THAT THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION IS OPPOSED TO THIS MATTER, OR
ANY OTHER ZONING, PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE MASTER PLAN. HE
FELT THAT MAYBE THERE SHOULD BE A MORATORIUM, AND THAT THERE HAS NOT
BEEN SUFFICIENT GROUNDWORK DONE ON THE SUBJECT. MR. BADENHOP WONDERED
WHAT CONTRIBUTIONS THE DEVELOPERS WOULD BE WILLING TO MAKE REGARDING
SEWERAGE; WHEN THE PACKAGE PLANT IS PHASED OUT, WILL THEY PUT UP
ESCROW MONEY; AND WILL THEY PROVIDE A LIFT STATION? HE THEN CITED
AN EXAMPLE OF OTHER SYSTEMS THAT HAVE POLLUTED A RIVER, SUCH AS IN THE
LOXAHATCHEE RIVER AREA. MR. BADENHOP FELT THAT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED
IS INSUFFICIENT, AND APPROVING THIS WOULD BE OPENING UP PANDORA'S
BOX. HE STATED THERE WAS A UNANIMOUS VOTE, BY THE 11 PERSONS ON THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION, TO OPPOSE THIS MATTER.
WILLIAM BELL, SUMMERPLACE, APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD AS A
CITIZEN, NOT REPRESENTING SUMMERPLACE. HE SPOKE ABOUT PEOPLE HAVING
SHALLOW WELLS IN THAT AREA AND SOMETIMES THEIR WATER IS OCEAN WATER.
MR. BELL EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE DEVELOPERS USING REVERSE OSMOSIS
BECAUSE THEY MUST REFRESH THE ELEMENTS, AND HE WONDERED WHERE THE
WASTE WAS GOING TO GO - TO THE SHALLOW WELLS? HE ASKED IF THE DEVELOPERS
WERE WILLING TO SAY THEY WOULD GUARANTEE THE RESIDENTS WILL HAVE
CLEAN WELLS.
J. G. ROSE, 271 SEA OAK, INDIAN RIVER SHORES, CAME BEFORE
THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THE LAST OF THE OCEANFRONT NEEDS CAREFUL
PLANNING. HE ADDED THAT NO UTILITIES ARE THERE NOW AND A LONG RANGE
CONCEPTUAL PLAN SHOULD BE DONE ON THE LAND USE PLAN BEFORE ANYTHING
IS REZONED. MR. ROSE COMMENTED THAT THE NORTH BEACH AREA HAS A MAJOR
UNDERTAKING FOR INCOMING RESIDENTS AND, IN ADDITION, THE BOARD HAS
PERMITTED SEVERAL OCEANFRONT PROJECTS THAT HAVE YET TO BE BUILT.
HE THEN COMMENTED ON THE DIALOGUE PRESENTED EARLIER REGARDING THE PLAN
JUST BEING A PRELIMINARY ONE; AND THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING WAS
FOR S UNITS PER ACRE, AND NOW THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED. MR. ROSE
SUMMARIZED THAT MORE TIME IS NEEDED AS THIS APPLICATION PRECEDES
OTHERS WHICH WILL BE BEFORE THE BOARD IN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS - THE
REZONING WILL SET A PRECEDENT. HE FELT THIS REZONING REQUEST SHOULD
BE DENIED.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE DENSITY AT .JOHN'S ISLAND,
AND MR. ROSE DETERMINED THAT IT WAS APPROXIMATELY 4 TO 4.5 UNITS
PER ACRE.
ROBERT RYDER, THE MOORINGS, COMMENTED TO THE BOARD THAT HE
WAS A DISTURBED AND CONFUSED RESIDENT CONCERNING THIS MATTER. HE
ASKED IF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVED OF THE APPLICATION.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT IT WAS DENIED BY THE PLANNING,
& ZONING COMMISSION ON A VOTE OF 3 TO 1.
MR. RYDER STATED HE WAS CONFUSED BY THE DENSITY OF UNITS
PER ACRE AS THEY SEEM TO BE CHANGING FROM WEEK TO WEEK; HE FELT THE
REQUEST MUST BE BASED ON EXISTING ZONING AND NOT ON A PROPOSAL.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ADVISED THAT THE LAND IS PRESENTLY ZONED
R-1 AND THE APPLICANTS ARE REQUESTING A CHANGE IN ZONING.
COMMISSIONER Loy INTERJECTED THAT THE APPLICANT IS ACTING
UNDER THE PRESENT REGULATIONS.
MR. RYDER COMMENTED THAT HE DID NOT DOUBT THE INTEGRITY OF
ATTORNEY HENDERSON, THE OWNERS AND DEVELOPERS; HOWEVER, THE RUSH FOR
THE REZONING BOTHERED HIM WHEN IT IS INCONCEIVABLE THAT THEY CAN
PROCEED WITHOUT WATER AND SEWAGE. HE ADDED THAT THEY SPEAK ABOUT
TEST WELLS, AND PACKAGE PLANTS, AND IT IS PRETTY WELL ESTABLISHED
THAT THERE IS NO WATER THERE.
23 BOU 44 PAGE 603
SEP 2 41980
SEP 2 41960
:aaox 44 PAGE 604
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT THERE ARE MANY STEPS THAT THE
DEVELOPERS WILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH, AS THEY CANNOT DO ANY CONSTRUCTION
WITHOUT WATER BEING THERE.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT MR. CAIN,
WHO OWNS PROPERTY NORTH OF WABASSO ROAD, WAS PART OF THE LEWIS TRUSTEE,
ALONG WITH MR. SCHAUB.
RICK SCHAUB INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MR. CAIN WAS HIS UNCLE.
MR, RYDER FELT THESE RELATIONSHIPS AND THE PROPERTY INVOLVED
WOULD CAUSE A DOMINO EFFECT.
LOMAX GWATHMEY, 23 SEA HORSE LANE, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND
NOTED THAT THE REQUEST IS TO GET A DEFINITION OF THE TYPE OF BUILDING
THE OWNER CAN BUILD - HE DOES NOT NEED A DENSITY OF S TO EXECUTE
HIS PROJECT, BUT HE CANNOT BUILD CLUSTER HOUSING UNDER THE PRESENT
DEFINITION. HE SUGGESTED THAT IT WOULD BE EASIER FOR ALL CONCERNED
TO GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON WAS OPPOSED TO HAVING A MORATORIUM AT
THIS TIME. HE STATED THAT THERE IS A DEEP WATER .AQUIFER WHICH SHOWS
A 35' LEVEL, MEANING THE PRESSURE THERE IS ADEQUATE. ATTORNEY
HENDERSON WENT ON TO SAY THE WATER IS NOT POTABLE AND MUST BE TREATED,
AND THE INFORMATION HE HAS INDICATES THERE WILL BE NO SUBSTANTIAL
EFFECT ON THE SHALLOW WELL AQUIFER BY TAPPING INTO THE DEEP WELL
ACQUIFER. HE ALSO FELT THAT MR. CURTIN'S REPORT CONFLICTS SOMEWHAT
WITH THE DOT FIGURES. ATTORNEY HENDERSON COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY'S
FRANCHISE ORDINANCE WOULD CONTROL IMPACT FEES, AND SINCE THIS IS A
CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, THERE IS NO WAY THAT THIS SYSTEM IS GOING
TO BE ALLOWED TO DETERIORATE TO A POINT THAT IT WILL NOT SERVE ITS
PEOPLE. HE THEN MADE AN AFFIRMATIVE STEP BY FORMALLY AMENDING THE
APPLICATION TO APPLY FOR A DESIGNATION OF R -2A WEST OF A -1-A.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ANNOUNCED THAT SINCE THERE ARE ONLY FOUR
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT TODAY, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF A TIE VOTE; IN
THE EVENT OF THIS, POSSIBLY THIS MATTER SHOULD BE TABLED UNTIL THE
FIFTH COMMISSIONER IS PRESENT.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED CONCERNING THIS MATTER, AND WHETHER
OR NOT THE TAPE OF THE MEETING WOULD BE SUFFICIENT FOR COMMISSIONER
DEESON TO REVIEW.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED IF THE FIFTH COMMISSIONER SHOULD
APPEAR, HE SHOULD HEAR ALL THE TESTIMONY THAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED.
HE DID NOT THINK HIS MERE PRESENCE AT THE TIME OF VOTING WOULD BE
SUFFICIENT, SO IF THE BOARD DOES TABLE THIS FOR THE PURPOSE OF HAVING
HIM VOTE, HE THOUGHT THE BOARD WOULD HAVE TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING
AND GO THROUGH ALL THE TESTIMONY AGAIN. ATTORNEY COLLINS BELIEVED
THAT AS LONG AS THERE WAS NO OBJECTION FROM THE PARTIES, COMMISSIONER
DEESON COULD LISTEN TO THE TAPES AND VOTE, BASED ON THAT; BUT SOMETIMES
THE TAPES ARE NOT FULLY REFLECTIVE OF ALL THE INFORMATION, OR THE
INFLECTIONS THAT ARE PRESENTED IN THE TESTIMONY.
COMMISSIONER LOY FELT THIS SHOULD BE RESCHEDULED ON A DAY
OTHER THAN AT A REGULARLY SCHEDULED COMMISSION MEETING.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT IF THE INTENT OF THE BOARD
IS TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER UNTIL COMMISSIONER DEESON CAN BE PRESENT,
HE THOUGHT THERE SHOULD BE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER ON THE MOTION TO
CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. HE ADDED THAT THE BOARD WILL NOT HAVE TO
READVERTISE, AS LONG AS IT IS CONTINUED TO A TIME CERTAIN. REFERRING
TO THE PETITIONERS AND THE OPPONENTS WHO ARE PRESENT TODAY, ATTORNEY
COLLINS NOTED THAT IF ANY OF THEM HAD OPPOSITION, HE WOULD FEEL MUCH
MORE COMFORTABLE WITH A FULL PRESENTATION TO SATISFY ANY OBJECTIONS
THAT THEY MAY HAVE. HE ADDED THAT IF THERE WAS NO OPPOSITION, THEN
HE THOUGHT THAT COMMISSIONER DEESON COULD LISTEN TO THE TAPES, REVIEW
ALL THE EVIDENCE, AND HEAR THE ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY THAT MAY COME AT
THE CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. THE REASONING IS SIMPLE: IF THE
DECISION IS ATTACKED BY EITHER SIDE, ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT WANT IT
ATTACKED ON THE BASIS THAT ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS DID NOT HAVE
ACCESS TO ALL OF THE INFORMATION.
COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT YOU DO NOT ALWAYS GET
EVERYTHING ON TAPE.
25
L- SEP 2 41980
, . BOOK 44 PAE05
SEP 2 41980 Boa 44 PA4E606
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION TO CLOSE
THE PRESENT PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THE PUBLIC HEARING SHOULD BE ON
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1980 AT 9:00 A.M.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT SINCE THERE
IS A SIMILAR REZONING SCHEDULED ON OCTOBER 8TH, IT COULD ALSO BE
SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 15TH, POSSIBLY IN THE AFTERNOON.
ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL
HAVE TO BE OPENED AT THE REGULARLY ADVERTISED TIME ON OCTOBER 8TH,
ANNOUNCE THE NEW DATE, AND THEN CONTINUE IT TO OCTOBER 15TH.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT IT WOULD BE EASIER TO CONSIDER BOTH
REZONING REQUESTS ON THE SAME DAY.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THAT THE BOARD CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M.
ON OCTOBER 15, 1980 AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE AUDIENCE HAS HEARD THE
BOARDS POSITION TO INCLUDE COMMISSIONER DEESON, AND ASKED IF ANYONE
HAD ANY OBJECTION.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT HE DID, AS HIS CLIENTS HAD
GONE TO A LOT OF EXPENSE TO ATTEND THE PUBLIC HEARING TODAY; AND HE
COMMENTED THAT HE WAS NOT REALLY SURE THE PROCEDURE THE BOARD IS TAKING
IS LEGAL OR APPROPRIATE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED ATTORNEY HENDERSON TO FORMULATE AND
ADVISE HIM OF HIS DEFINITE OPINION BEFORE OCTOBER 15TH.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON COMMENTED THAT HE WAS RESERVING OBJECTIONS
FOR COMMISSIONER DEESON VOTING ON THE MATTER, AND THAT WOULD BE HIS
POSITION ON OCTOBER 15TH, UNLESS HE WOULD GET IN TOUCH WITH ATTORNEY
COLLINS SOONER.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
26
PUBLIC HEARING — REZONING REQUEST BY W. C. GRAVES, SJR.
FROM C71A TO LM -1
THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
AS FOLLOWS:
VERO REACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Reach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
in the matter of L
in the Court, was pub-
`
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
(J
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
/` C ��
Sworn to and subscribed before me this qday of A.D.
{7 (usiness Manager)
C..C/
(SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Cb/rt, Indian River County, Florida)
`NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
Planning and Zoning Commission of Indi
River County, Florida, has tentatively ap-
proved the following changes and additions to
the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County,
Florida, which changes and additions are
substantially as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property situated
in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit:
That part of the South one-half of the Nor-
theast quarter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 3, Township 32 South, Range 39 East,
Indian River County, Florida bounded on the
West by Old U.S. Highway No. 1,also known as
Old Dixie Highway, and bounded in the East by
the present U.S. Highway No. 1, less and ex-
cepting therefrom the right-of-way for
Cemetery Road, and also, Less and excepting
therefrom that part of a 40 -foot wide ditch
right-of-way a's describedin Official Record
Book 92 at page 93, Public'Records of Indian i
River County, Florida, containing 5.547 acres,
more or less
Be
Com-
mercial hDistrict to LM -1 ed C1Liight Manufacturing
District.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
Planning and Zoning Commission in the
Council Chambers of the Vero Beach City Hall,
Vero Beach, Florida, on Thursday, August 14,
1980, at 7:30 P.M., after which said public
hearing in relation thereto at which parties in
interest and citizens shall have an opportunity
to be heard will be held by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, in the Council Chambers of the Vero
Beach City Hall, Vero Beach, ' Florida, on
Wednesday, September 24,1980, at 9:30 A.M.
Board of County commissioners
Indian River County
BY: Willard W. Seibert, Jr.
Chairman
Indian River County Planning
and Zoning Commission
By: Dick Bird, Chairman
my 13,18,1980.
NOTICES WERE SENT BY THE CLERK, IN COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA
STATUTE 125.66, TO W. C. GRAVES, SJR. & AUDREY GRAVES; CARTER ASSOCIATES,
INC.; AND MR. DEAN BRUCE, ADVISING THEM OF THE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER APPROACHED THE BOARD AND EXPLAINED
THAT THE REZONING APPLICATION WAS INITIALLY SUBMITTED BY MR, GRAVES
AND THE PROPERTY IS NOW OWNED BY DEAN BRUCE.
27
SEP 2 41900
Bou 44 PAcE,607
r
SEP 2 4 1980 aoox 44 PAU,608
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION
IS A 5.5 ACRE PARCEL IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF CEMETERY ROAD BETWEEN
U.S. #1 AND OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY, AND IS PRESENTLY ZONED C -IA. HE
ADDED THAT THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO DENY
THIS REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING STAFF FELT THERE WAS NO OVERRIDING
NEED FOR A CHANGE AT THIS TIME. MR. REVER STATED THAT THEIR STANCE
CAN BE SOMEWHAT MODIFIED BY THE FACT THAT IF A NODAL CONCEPT IS
ACCEPTABLE IN THE LAND USE PLAN, THIS PROPERTY COULD FALL WITHIN EITHER
THE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ZONING. HE COMMENTED THAT THE STAFF
DID NOT WANT TO CREATE A STRIP AT THAT LOCATION. MR. REVER FELT
IT WOULD BE PREMATURE TO RECOMMEND REZONING, BUT ON THE OTHER HAND
IT DOES SEEM PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE, AND THE PLANNING STAFF HAS NOW
TENTATIVELY AGREED TO THIS RECOMMENDATION.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE PROPOSED USE OF THE LAND,
WHICH IS FOR MINI—WAREHOUSES, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THEY ARE
COMPATIBLE IN BOTH THE C-1 AND THE LM -1 DISTRICT.
ART WILSON, WHO HAS AN OPTION ON THE PROPERTY WITH MR. BRUCE,
APPROACHED THE BOARD AND COMMENTED THAT THERE IS A GOOD MARKET
FOR MINI—WAREHOUSES IN THIS AREA. HE ADDED THAT THERE WAS A
POSSIBILITY SOME OF THE LAND COULD BE USED FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES
ALSO, AS THERE ARE ROADS ON THREE SIDES.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT ALLOWING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN
THE EXISTING C—IA DISTRICT TO ALLOW MINI—WAREHOUSES TO BE BUILT.
COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT WAS THE KIND OF APPROACH HE
WOULD LIKE TO SEE, AND WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF FINDING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION
IN THE C—IA ZONING TO ALLOW THIS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED THE WORDING OF THE SPECIAL
EXCEPTION AND SUGGESTED IT,READ THAT MINI—WAREHOUSES ARE TO BE ONLY
USED COMMERCIALLY.
FRED BRIGGS, 811 GAYFEATHER, APPROACHED THE BOARD AND
INFORMED THEM THAT THE PROPERTY JUST WEST OF THE RAILROAD IS PROPOSED
TO HAVE BUILT SINGLE FAMILY, HIGH INCOME HOMES. HE ADDED THAT A
28
SITE PLAN WILL BE PRESENTED SHORTLY TO THE BOARD; THIS INFORMATION
WAS JUST TO ADVISE THE BOARD WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED IN THE FUTURE.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHED TO
BE HEARD. THERE WERE NONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONER LOY THOUGHT IT WAS THE GENERAL FEELING OF THE
BOARD THAT THEY PURSUE THE INSERTION OF MINI -WAREHOUSES INTO SPECIAL
EXCEPTIONS IN THE C -IA ZONING. SHE ADDED, IN THAT CASE, THAT MR.
BRUCE COULD WITHDRAW HIS APPLICATION FOR REZONING, AND A NEW ORDINANCE
COULD BE IMPLEMENTED.
COMMISSIONER LYONS WITHDREW HIS MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE WITHDREW HIS SECOND.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT MR. BRUCE
WOULD WITHDRAW HIS APPLICATION, AND MR, WILSON CONCURRED,
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED THAT MR. BRUCE WRITE A SHORT LETTER
FORMALLY WITHDRAWING THE REZONING APPLICATION AND SUBMIT IT TO THE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
PUBLIC HEARING - ADOPTION OF LAND MINING ORDINANCE
THE HOUR OF IO:OO O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
AS FOLLOWS:
c
MCK 44 Pasf 609
SEP 2 41900
SEP 2 41980 610
nn{{��
800K 44 FAGS U1U
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach
in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a //.h• tt
E �
in the matter of G
in the Court, was pub-
vioo
fished in said newspaper in the issues of -.2 70,
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed beforXmth' 'tday of
ell, V
L
(SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Cou(rlt
(Business Manager)
Indian River County, Florida)
NOTICE u ,
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, will hold a public hearing on
September 24, 1980, at 10:00 A.M. in the City
Council Chambers in the Vero Beach City Hall,
to consider the adoption of an
1
Ordinance providing for the regulation of
land mining in Indian River County; defining
terms, establishing objectives and minimum
standards; requiring permits and
reclamation; providing procedures for permit
applications and issuance; providing for en-
forcement and penalties for violations;
providing severability; and providing an of
fective date.
BOARD OF COUNTY COM-
MISSIONERS -
OF-'- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
By: -s -Willard W. Siebert Jr:
Chairman
Au*22,1980.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THAT THE LEGAL NOTICE WAS IN
ORDER, BUT IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING,
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT EXPLAINED THAT IT WAS THE INTENT OF THE
BOARD TO REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
BEFORE HAVING IT COME BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS—
SIONER Loy, THAT THE BOARD REFER THE LAND MINING ORDINANCE BACK TO
THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS, INPUT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THE REASON FOR
THIS ACTION WAS THAT SUFFICIENT NOTICE HAD NOT BEEN MADE TO THE PUBLIC
AND THAT A DECISION COULD NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
IT WAS VOTED ON AND
PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, SECTION 12-4
THE HOUR OF 11:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
AS FOLLOWS:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Publishes Wecxiv
Vero Beach, Indian River County, rloriota
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appcorcd ) J, 'ich.. nci:n, Jr. un Th
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Jour,: 1, a ee6 1v n: wspap,�r fju").ii__J d
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the atta&.,,J copy of ad�ertr-..ern 'r, .Laing
a en
in the matter of
4Z -
in the Court, was � ib -
fished in said newspaper in the issues of �• lfe —
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newsoaoer published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said nev.,spaper has harete7 rre
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and kas teen s:accred
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Fit-, da
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached cofw cr .._,.:r-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised anv Per on, turn or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securL;s this ao :r-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed b fore this day of_�J=
(Busines, Manage -r) -
(SEAL)
(Clerk of the Circuit Qojrt, Indian River Cc.:nty, ;oridal
NOTICE
ard
of NC ulntyE ICommissioners GIVE
of Indian River
County, Florida, will hold a public hearing on
September 24, 1980 at 11:00 A.M. in the City
Council Chambers in the Vero Beach City Hall
to consider the adoption of: 1
I
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND
ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 12, SECTION 12-4,
PENALTY FOR VCOLATIONS, BY
PROVIDING FOR A NEW SUBSECTION
FOR VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES. -
BOARD OF COUNTY COM-
MISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
BY: -s -Willard W. Siebert Jr.
Chairman i
Sept. 5, 1980.
ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THIS ORDINANCE, HAVING TO
DO WITH JUNK, TRASH AND LITTER, IS TO CURE THE EXISTING ORDINANCE
THAT STILL REFERENCES THE PENALTIES AS CRIMES.
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHED
TO SPEAK. THERE WERE NONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LAY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE N0. 80-35 AMENDING
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 12, SECTION
12-4. 31 soa 44 PAGE 61
Fr- -1
SEP 2 41990 boos 44 PnE 612
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 80- 35
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE OF
LAWS AND ORDINANCES, CIiAPTER 12, SECTION 12-41 PENALTY
FOR VIOLATIONS, BY PROVIDING FOR A NEW SUBSECTION FOR'
VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, that Indian River County Ordinance No. 12-4,
which previously read:
Section 12-4. Penalty for Violations
"Any person, firm or corporation or agent thereof
violating the provisions of this act [chapter] or
of the regulations adopted pursuant hereto shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished
according to law."
Indian River County Ordinance 12-4 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
Section 12-4. Penalty for Violations
"Any person, firm or corporation or agent thereof
violating the provisions of this chapter or of
the regulations adopted pursuant hereto shall
upon conviction be punished by a fine not to
exceed $500.00. The Board of County Commissioners
may enforce the provisions of this chapter by
seeking injunctive relief, or any other remedies
provided by law.
This Ordinance shall take effect September 29, 1980.
SPOUSE ABUSE - REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ADVANCE
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE FOLLOWING REQUEST FROM THE
SPOUSE ABUSE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY:
�\\SAFESPACE
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
�I
SPOUSE ABUSE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC.
P.O.BOX 427 VERO BEACH, FLA. 32560
caff 569-.E.L.P.
To:. Indian River County Commision
From: Sara Finney, Executive Director �,fi. e`"
Subject: Financial Advance Request
Date: September 17, 1980
We have been notified by the Planning Council in Orlando that
our ISAA Grant will not be approved until approximatly October 15.
We had originally been told we would have approval by mid-September.
They have assured us that the delay is only one of paperwork and
that our grant will be approved. The Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council has given us a satisfactory A95 review as required
by TRA A .
Our current award budget is on the verge of depletion. Since
we have no other source of funding at the present time we are faced
with the inability to meet our payroll and rental obligations as of
October 1. Our new grant period is to begin October 1. Originally
the new period was to begin September 1. In anticipation of this
financial lapse time we were prepared with one months additional
funds. IEAA granted us an extension of one month. At this time
those funds have been used up.
We would like to request an advance from the county so that
we may meet the financial obligations involved in maintaining the
shelter. The amount we are requesting is one -twelfth of our new
total grant award, $2884.50.
COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY'S PART OF THE
GRANT CAME TO APPROXIMATELY $1,8001 WHICH IS A LITTLE LESS THAN THE
ONE -TWELFTH REQUESTED. SHE ADDED THAT MS. FINNEY FELT THIS AMOUNT
WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE AT THIS TIME.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ADVANCE THE COUNTY'S LOCAL
MATCH TO SPOUSE ABUSE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, WHICH WILL CARRY THEM
OVER UNTIL THEIR GRANT COMES THROUGH.
SEP 2
41980 33 44 PACE 613
a
^-4
t{
To:. Indian River County Commision
From: Sara Finney, Executive Director �,fi. e`"
Subject: Financial Advance Request
Date: September 17, 1980
We have been notified by the Planning Council in Orlando that
our ISAA Grant will not be approved until approximatly October 15.
We had originally been told we would have approval by mid-September.
They have assured us that the delay is only one of paperwork and
that our grant will be approved. The Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council has given us a satisfactory A95 review as required
by TRA A .
Our current award budget is on the verge of depletion. Since
we have no other source of funding at the present time we are faced
with the inability to meet our payroll and rental obligations as of
October 1. Our new grant period is to begin October 1. Originally
the new period was to begin September 1. In anticipation of this
financial lapse time we were prepared with one months additional
funds. IEAA granted us an extension of one month. At this time
those funds have been used up.
We would like to request an advance from the county so that
we may meet the financial obligations involved in maintaining the
shelter. The amount we are requesting is one -twelfth of our new
total grant award, $2884.50.
COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY'S PART OF THE
GRANT CAME TO APPROXIMATELY $1,8001 WHICH IS A LITTLE LESS THAN THE
ONE -TWELFTH REQUESTED. SHE ADDED THAT MS. FINNEY FELT THIS AMOUNT
WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE AT THIS TIME.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ADVANCE THE COUNTY'S LOCAL
MATCH TO SPOUSE ABUSE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, WHICH WILL CARRY THEM
OVER UNTIL THEIR GRANT COMES THROUGH.
SEP 2
41980 33 44 PACE 613
SEP 2 4196 Boa 44 PAGE 64
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RECESSED AT 12:00 NOON
FOR LUNCH AND RECONVENED AT 1:45 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS
PRESENT. DEPUTY CLERK VIRGINIA HARGREAVES TOOK OVER FOR DEPUTY CLERK JAN I CE
CALDWELL FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING.
RURAL SAN LT_AT ION RATE INCREASE HEAR I NG - RESOLUTION SO -93
THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO -WIT:
VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
in the matter of 4.1z�'i lldutL jM S�e
in the
Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of%2
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper. 9
Sworn to and subscribed before me this /c'2 day of- SAE A. D.
r % , luslness Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Cour, I than River County, Florida)
(SEAL)
BEFORE THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
In' Re:Application of Rural. Sanitation .
Service Inc. for authority to increase its rates
for garbage service in the unincorporated area
of Indian River County.
NOTICE OF NEARING
The Board of County Comimissioners� of
Indian River County will hold a hearing on
September 24, 1980, at 1:30 P.M. In its hearing
room in the Council Chambers, City Hall, Vero
Beach, Florida, on the application of Rural
Sanitation Service Inc. for authority to Make
effective the following garbage rate increases:
Present Rate Proposed Rate
$6.00 per month",$7.00 per month
NOTE: No rate Increase is requested for
Commercial accounts at this time. .
Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida ';'
By: Willard W. Siebert Jr., Chairman
Sept. 10, 12, 1980 "
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED THAT MR. DONLON, THE MEMBER OF
THE ADMINISTRATORS STAFF WHO HANDLES FRANCHISES, GIVE THE BOARD A
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE RATE INCREASE REQUEST MADE BY RURAL
SANITATION SERVICE,
34
MR. DONLON COMMENTED THAT THE STAFF NEVER HAS MADE A
RECOMMENDATION ON RATE INCREASES AND HE WAS NOT REALLY PREPARED.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ASKED HIM WHETHER THE PROPER FINANCIAL
REPORTS, STATEMENTS, AND BACK-UP MATERIAL HAD BEEN RECEIVED AND
WHETHER THE FINANCE OFFICER RECOMMENDED THAT THE INCREASE BE GRANTED.
MR. DONLON STATED THAT RURAL SANITATION HAD BEEN VERY
COOPERATIVE IN SUPPLYING ALL THE INFORMATION ASKED AND THE FINANCE
OFFICER DID NOT SEE ANY PROBLEMS.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THAT THERE IS ANOTHER FRANCHISE
SANITATION COMPANY IN THE COUNTY, AND ASKED IF THEY DID NOT REQUEST
AN INCREASE RECENTLY.
MR. DONLON CONFIRMED THAT INDIAN RIVER SANITATION SERVICE
DID REQUEST A SIMILAR INCREASE IN JULY, AND IT WAS GRANTED.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ASKED WHETHER, BASED ON THIS INFORMATION,
MR. DONLON WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE INCREASE BE GRANTED AS FAR AS
STAFF IS CONCERNED, AND THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ALL THE REQUIREMENTS
HAVE BEEN MET.
MR. DONLON STATED THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET,, AND
STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THE INCREASE BE GRANTED.
ROBERT FRYER, OWNER OF RURAL SANITATION SERVICE, CAME
BEFORE THE BOARD.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF HIS REQUEST FOR A RATE INCREASE
PERTAINED TO RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS ONLY, AND MR. FRYER STATED THAT IT
DID.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REQUESTED THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS
BE OFFICIALLY ENTERED INTO THE RECORD IN ORDER TO HAVE A COMPLETE
PRESENTATION OF RURAL SANITATION SERVICE:
1979 CORPORATION INCOME TAX RETURN
1979 CORPORATION INTANGIBLE TAX RETURN
BALANCE SHEET 1977-78-79
BALANCE SHEET 1980
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 1977-78-79
LETTER OF 5/27/80 FROM ACCOUNTANT CRAIG BOWEN
LETTER TO ADMINISTRATOR 6/2/80 FROM R. FRYER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY FINANCE OFFICER
RECOMMENDATION OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT STAFF MEMBER, ED FRY
SAID DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK.
35 eaoK 44 F�ac�6�.5
SEP 2 41980
SEP 241900
BOOK 44 PACE 616
IN DISCUSSION IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BASIC RATE NOW BEING
CHARGED BY RURAL SANITATION IN SEBASTIAN AND INDIAN RIVER SHORES IS
$6.00 PER MONTH, AND ANY CHANGE IN THAT RATE WOULD HAVE TO COME
AFTER A HEARING WITH THOSE MUNICIPALITIES. MR. FRYER INFORMED THE
BOARD THAT HE HAS SEPARATE FRANCHISES WITH FELLSMERE, INDIAN RIVER
SHORES, AND SEBASTIAN, ALL FOR DIFFERENT TIME PERIODS.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE BROUGHT UP THE ISSUE OF REAR YARD PICK-
UP VERSUS CURBSIDE PICKUP, AND MR. FRYER INFORMED HIM THAT THEY NOW
HAVE 100% FRONT PICKUP, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AILING PEOPLE.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF HE HAS FOUND THAT THIS POLICY
ASSISTS THEM IN REGARD TO TIME AND LABOR COSTS, AND MR. FRYER STATED
THE MAIN ADVANTAGE IS THAT IT ASSISTS HIM IN KEEPING HELP. HE POINTED
OUT THAT IF THERE WERE ANY REAR YARD PICKUP IN THE COUNTY, IT WOULD
BE VERY TIME CONSUMING DUE TO THE LACK OF DENSITY, AND HE WOULD HAVE
TO PUT ON ADDITIONAL MEN AND TRUCKS, WHICH WOULD INCREASE COSTS. HE
CONTINUED THAT HE WENT TO THE FRONT YARD PICKUP POLICY ABOUT TWO YEARS
AGO, AND IT WAS DONE SECTION BY SECTION, THE PEOPLE BEING NOTIFIED IN
ADVANCE THAT THEIR GARBAGE WOULD HAVE TO BE OUT IN FRONT.
COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT A GENTLEMAN IN COUNTRY
CLUB POINTE HAD RAISED THE POINT THAT WE HAVE REAR YARD PICKUP IN
VERO BEACH FOR LESS MONEY.
MR. FRYER POINTED OUT THAT VERO BEACH, WHICH IS MORE
CONSOLIDATED, DOES NOT HAVE 1/3 OF THE MILEAGE TO COVER THAT HIS
COMPANY DOES AND THEY SHOULD CHARGE LESS,
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED HOW MR. FRYER HAD NOTIFIED HIS
CUSTOMERS OF THIS HEARING, AND HE STATED THAT HE CONTACTED THEM BY
MAIL, MOST OF THE NOTICES BEING MAILED OUT LAST FRIDAY AND ABOUT
300 LAST MONDAY. HE NOTED THAT HE HAS OVER 2,000 CUSTOMERS.
DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT THE USE OF CONTAINERS, AND MR.
FRYER STATED THAT HE CHARGES PER CUBIC YARD FOR THE COMMERCIAL RATE
AND THERE IS NO INCREASE IN THAT. HE FELT IT IS ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE
PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE DUMPSTERS AND THAT IF YOU BREAK IT DOWN, THEY
ARE PAYING LESS AS A FAMILY.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE CITY WENT FROM A UNIT CHARGE
TO A VOLUME CHARGE, AND MR. FRYER AGREED THAT THE CITY PREVIOUSLY
CHARGED PER UNIT, I.E., IF THERE WERE 100 UNITS IN A CONDOMINIUM,
IT WOULD BE BASED ON THAT; IT NOW IS BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE CONTAINER.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD RECEIVED
A LETTER FROM MRS. .JAMES AYERS IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED RATE
INCREASE, AND HE ASKED THAT IT BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES, AS
FOLLOWS:
�y 1771 44th Avenue
Vero Beach, FL 32960
1 j September 23, 1980
Board of County Commissioners
Vero Beach, Florida
Dear Commissioners:
I respectfully request that this letter be
considered as a protest at the hearing of Rural
Sanitation September 24 to increase their monthly
rate from $6 to $7.
As Rural Sanitation's rates have increased,
their service has deteriorated:
1. Their rates have already increased 100% over
the last few years, even higher than the national
inflation rate. The increase has been from $3 to
$6 per month. Another dollar to $7 would make
the rate increase an unrealistic 133/�•
2. Meanwhile, the service has deteriorated.
Instead of having trash picked up at the back
door as was the case for, so many years, we are
now required to transport it to the road, which
in our case is at the end of an extremely long;
driveway.
In addition, the trash collectors hurl the
garbage can tops indiscriminately far from the
pickup point, and leave the cans in the middle
of the driveway, almost in the road itself.
I would respectfully suggest that the
Commissioners investigate the number of hours
Rural Sanitation's employees work per day and
per week, and how much they make per hour.
Sincerely,
(Mrs. James S. Ayers)
37 ROOK 44 F,, jr 617
SEP 2 41980
SEP 2 4198®
BOOK 44 FACEB18
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
STUART CAMPBELL OF 3035 GOLFVIEW DRIVE FELT THAT RURAL
SANITATION DOES A MARVELOUS JOB, BUT NOTED THAT AN INCREASE FROM
$6.00 TO $7.00 IS A 16% INCREASE, WHICH IS MORE THAN EITHER THE
FIREMEN OR POLICEMEN GOT. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE CURBSIDE RE-
QUIREMENT ONLY STARTED ABOUT 1-1/2 YEARS AGO, AND HE FELT THAT HAD
TO BE A SAVINGS. MR. CAMPBELL NOTED THAT RURAL SANITATION HAD AN
INCREASE RECENTLY AND WISHED TO KNOW JUST WHEN THEY DID HAVE THEIR
LAST RAISE. HE ALSO WISHED TO KNOW HOW MUCH INDIAN RIVER SHORES WAS
GOING TO BE INCREASED AND COMMENTED THAT THIS MEETING COULD SET A
PRECEDENT. HE WAS OF THE OPINION THAT EITHER INDIAN RIVER SHORES
SHOULD BE INCREASED MORE OR HIS AREA INCREASED LESS, CITING THE
RELATIVE DIFFERENCE IN DISTANCE TO THE DUMP AND THE COST OF GASOLINE
AS THE REASON FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THE INCREASE BEING RE-
QUESTED IS NOT AN ANNUAL INCREASE, AND IT CANNOT BE COMPARED TO THE
RATE OF INFLATION.
COMMISSIONER LOY EXPLAINED THAT THIS IS A COUNTY FRANCHISE
AND WHILE THE DAY MAY COME WHEN WE HAVE ZONES WITH DIFFERENT RATES,
AT THIS MOMENT, THEIR FRANCHISE COVERS THE ENTIRE COUNTY. SHE
CONTINUED THAT IN MAY OF 1977, RURAL SANITATION DID RECEIVE A RATE
INCREASE FROM $3.75 PER MONTH TO $4.25, AND THEN, IN FEBRUARY OF 19781
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GAVE THEM A $1.75 PER MONTH INCREASE
BECAUSE OF THE NEW LANDFILL CHARGES. THAT $1.75 WAS NOT A RATE
INCREASE BECAUSE IT WAS JUST TO ALLOW FOR THE LANDFILL CHARGES; S0,
THEIR LAST INCREASE WAS IN 1977.
WILLIAM KOOLAGE, OF 815 26TH AVENUE, AGREED THAT THE SERVICE
GIVEN BY RURAL SANITATION HAS BEEN VERY GOOD. HE ASKED IF THEY HAD
ANY LIMITATION ON THE PICKUP. HE NOTED AT TIMES WHEN HE HAS AN EXTRA
BAG OR S0, SOMETIMES IT IS PICKED UP AND SOMETIMES IT IS NOT.
MR. FRYER STATED THAT HE TRIES TO PICK UP WHATEVER IS PUT
OUT WITHIN REASON, BUT OCCASIONALLY THEY HAVE TROUBLE WITH NEW HELP.
W
NOEL KERSEY, BETTER KNOWN AS FETE NOEL, INFORMED THE BOARD
THAT RURAL SANITATION SERVICE DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB, AND HE FELT THEY
DESERVE THE RAISE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED MR. FRYER WHAT EFFECTIVE DATE HE
WOULD LIKE BECAUSE OF HIS BILLING, AND HE RECOMMENDED AN EFFECTIVE
DATE OF NOVEMBER IST.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 80-93 APPROVING THE
RATE INCREASE FOR RURAL SANITATION SERVICE AS ADVERTISED AT $7.00
PER MONTH WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 1980,
SAID RESOLUTION WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN
RECEIVED.
ESTABLISHMENT OF SEXUAL ASSAULT TEAM
ROBERT E. STONE, STATE ATTORNEY, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO
DISCUSS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEXUAL ASSAULT TEAM AS PER THE
FOLLOWING PROPOSAL:
SEXUAL ASSAULT TEAM
The woman who is raped is doubly victimized.- first by the
attacker and again by the attitudes of society.
Rape was the fastest going crime in the country in the last
decade, according to Federal Un-iforrn Crime Reports. That's not
just nationwide. that's here too, in our own Communities,
Just last year Indian River County had nineteen (19) rapes,
Saint Lucie County, sixty(60), Martin County, twenty (20), and
Okeechobee County, nine (9); according to figures compiled by the
Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the picture isn't
getting any better. Statewide in the first three months of this
year 1,161 rapes were reported - a 24.8% increase over tho same
period last year.
39
SEP 2 41980 .
GOOK 44 PAGE 619
SEP 2 41980 Bou 44 PAGE 620
Even those figures don't tell the whole story. They're
just the reported rapes, the victims who wer.en't overcome by
shame or fear. Fear of indifference from Police or Prosecutors.
Fear of the trial ordeal. Fear of Publicity or embrassment..
Fear that friends or family might find out. Fear of revenge
from the attacker. Or fear that no one would believe them.
These are the most common reasons for not reporting rapes.
If we want to see more reported, more arrests made and more
convictions made, we must start at the bottom - with attitudes.
We must start educating the public to change attitudes
about rape, to increase community awareness of services for rape
victims and increase public support for a community -wide response
to rape.
That's where you come in. We have a plan. It's designed
to develop victim -oriented procedures which will reduce the
physical and psychological trauma of victims, enhance the
victims' treatment, encourage victim cooperation and help in
prosecution:
It's called a Sexual Assault Team, and here's how it works.
As soon as a rape is reported, the first agency contacted -
whether hospital personnel or law enforcement authorities,
will contact the Sexual Assault Team member through the State
Attorney's Office in that County. The team member will go immediately
to the victim, whether she's at the Police Station, the Hospital or
the crime scene. The Team member will serve as an escort, providing
emotional and physical support to the victim, answering any questions
she may have, explaining various procedures that will occur and
out -lining options. The escort will accompany the victim throughout
the whole process - the medical exam, initial and subsequent police
interviews, suspect indentification procedures, prosecutor
interviews and legal proceedings. If the victim or her family need
counseling, the escort will refer them to the proper agency. The
empathetic support the escort provides may facilitate the work of
the physi ci aii, the police officer, the detective, the prosecutor,
and it may be a significant factor in the victim's decision to
stay with the entire process.
� - r
We plan to start small. We want to hire one coordinator to
do just that -- coordinate effori:s i;c�tween law enforcement, Pledical
personnel, prosecutors and the vict-im. For a time she will be
the Team. Once the program is fully operational, we may expand
with trained and qualified voluri`Cceors as back-ups in each county.
The Coordinator will have to be a dynamo writh background or
experience in social work, criminal justice, behavioral sciences
and public relations in addition Lo formal education. She will need
to be an organizer familiar with government bureaucracy and
social resource networks.
The State Attorney's Office will provide office mace, supplies,
and support personnel. We need you to contribute- S 0.
to the $25,000 .salary/benefits package we will have to offer to
get a qualified coordinator. That represents
percentage - the same as you contribute to our office.
You may not think your county has enough rapes to justify
hiring a full-time coordinator. But keep this in mind: When
Ocala opened its rape crisis center, they handled 69 rapes in the
first six (6)months - only 16 of these were reported rapes.
As we said, the statistics don't tell the whole story.
The victims know the story from the terrifying beginning
to the grueling end. It's time they shared their story - with
Police, with Prosecutors, with the community.
WON'T YOU HELP?
STATE ATTORNEY STONE REPORTED THAT DURING THE PAST TEN
YEARS RAPE HAS INCREASED MORE THAN ANY OTHER CRIME IN FLORIDA. HE
EMPHASIZED THAT THIS PROGRAM IS AIMED AT AIDING THE RAPE VICTIM, WHO
IS SOMETIMES PRACTICALLY IGNORED IN THE PROCESS OF TRYING TO APPREHEND
AND PROSECUTE THE OFFENDER. MR. STONE BROUGHT UP A PARTICULARLY
VIOLENT CASE OF RAPE IN MARTIN COUNTY WHERE THEY CONTACTED THE SEXUAL
ASSAULT TEAM IN PALM BEACH COUNTY TO HELP WITH THE VICTIM WHO WAS IN
A VERY SEVERE STATE OF EMOTIONAL SHOCK. THEY NOT ONLY HELPED THE
VICTIM THROUGH THE TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCE, BUT HELPED OBTAIN A CONVICTION
41
� SEP 2 4190
nay 44 FaceRl
SEP 2 4 1990
OF TWO LIFE FELONIES.
BOOK 4 PAGE -629
HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE SET UP
SUCH A TEAM IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY ON A VOLUNTEER BASIS AND FEEL THEY
NOW HAVE REACHED THE POINT WHERE THEY NEED TO HIRE A PROFESSIONAL
COORDINATOR TO WORK WITH THE VOLUNTEERS. STATE ATTORNEY STONE REPORTED
THAT ST. LUCIE COUNTY HAS AGREED TO CONTRIBUTE $9,500 OF THE $25,000
NEEDED; MARTIN COUNTY WILL CONTRIBUTE $6,750; THEY ARE GOING TO ASK
OKEECHOBEE COUNTY FOR $2,500; AND ARE REQUESTING $6,250 FROM INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY. HE THEN INTRODUCED MISS HARRIET ROWE, WHO WORKS WITH
SUCH A PROGRAM IN PALM BEACH COUNTY.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED MISS ROWE AS TO HOW THIS
PROGRAM WORKS IN PALM BEACH COUNTY - WHETHER THEY COORDINATE WITH THE
MENTAL HEALTH BOARD - WHY THEY WORK WITH THE STATE ATTORNEY?
MISS ROWE EXPLAINED THIS IS A VICTIM ADVOCATE PROGRAM;
THEY REPRESENT THE VICTIM S INTERESTS. THEY SIDE WITH THE VICTIM
ON WHAT THEY WANT TO D0, BUT THE VICTIM NEEDS THE INFORMATION TO MAKE
THAT DECISION AND NEEDS THIS FROM PROFESSIONALS WHO CAN TELL THEM
HOW THEY WILL BE TREATED, THEY HAVE FOUND IT IS IMPORTANT TO
COORDINATE THE SERVICES SO THERE IS NO DUPLICATION, AND THEY DO
COORDINATE WITH MENTAL HEALTH IN THE LONG TERM WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE
DONE. THEY ALSO HAVE A HOT LINE WHERE PEOPLE CALL IN WHO DONT WANT
TO GO TO THE POLICE, AND MISS ROWE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HER
ORGANIZATION HAS BEEN ABLE TO PERSUADE APPROXIMATELY 95% TO GO TO
THE POLICE. SHE CONTINUED THAT SHE WORKS FOR THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, WHO NOW HAVE ASSUMED THEIR COMPLETE BUDGET,
WHICH AMOUNTS TO $88,000 YEARLY.
STATE ATTORNEY STONE NOTED THAT ONE OF THE PROBLEMS HERE
IS THAT THIS IS A FOUR COUNTY AREA.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THEY HAVE SOME IDEA WHERE THE
PROGRAM ULTIMATELY IS GOING TO END UP AND WHETHER THERE IS ANY
POSSIBLE PLACE FOR STATE FUNDING.
STATE ATTORNEY STONE BELIEVED THIS PROGRAM IS BEST SERVED
WITH VOLUNTARY HELP AND A COORDINATOR, AND THEY DON T INTEND TO
ESTABLISH A HUGE STAFF AND BECOME A BIG BUREAUCRATIC AGENCY. HE
42
NOTED THAT THE STATE WILL NOT FUND SUCH A PROGRAM THAT IS NOT TOTALLY
WITHIN THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED WHERE THE COORDINATOR WILL BE
LOCATED, AND MR. STONE ASSUMED HE WOULD BE LOCATED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY
WHICH IS CENTRAL. IT WOULD BE A 24 HOUR SERVICE AND THE SPACE WOULD
PROBABLY BE PROVIDED BY HIS OFFICE. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE WOULD
BE VOLUNTEER PEOPLE HERE, THEY ALREADY HAVE ABOUT 20 VOLUNTEERS IN
ST. LUCIE COUNTY REPRESENTING MANY AGENCIES; SOME DOCTORS ARE INTERESTED
IN VOLUNTEERING; AND THERE IS A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF INTEREST. HE
WENT ON TO INFORM THE BOARD THAT MISS ROWE TEACHES LAW ENFORCEMENT
OFFICERS HOW TO DEAL WITH THE RAPE VICTIM, TALKS WITH CIVIC GROUPS,
THE SCHOOL SYSTEM, AND HAS AN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ON RAPE PREVENTION,
ETC. HE POINTED OUT THAT SHE ACTUALLY IS EDUCATING POTENTIAL JURORS
WHICH HE FELT IS VERY WORTHWHILE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF THEIR SERVICES WOULD BE AVAILABLE
TO THE VICTIM WHO DOES NOT WANT TO PRESS CHARGES, AND MISS ROWE
CONFIRMED THAT THEY WOULD.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED, IF UNDER THEIR CONCEPT, THIS PRO-
FESSIONAL COORDINATOR WOULD BE AN EMPLOYEE OF THE STATE'S ATTORNEY,
MR. STONE STATED THAT THE COORDINATOR WOULD, IN A SENSE,
BE AN EMPLOYEE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ALTHOUGH NOT UNDER
THEIR STATE CAREER SERVICE PROGRAM, BUT THE COORDINATOR WOULD HAVE
THE FREEDOM TO DO WHAT THE VICTIM WISHED. WHAT THE STATE ATTORNEY
ENVISIONED WAS SETTING UP A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION.
COMMISSIONER LYONS WISHED TO KNOW WHAT OTHER SPECIFIC THINGS
THEY DO BESIDES COORDINATING VARIOUS AGENCIES.
MISS ROWE STATED THAT ONE OF THEIR BIGGEST CHALLENGES IS
FINDING HOUSING FOR THE VICTIM, ASSUMING SHE DOESN'T WANT TO GO BACK
HOME. SHE NOTED THAT SHE ALSO HAS SPENT TIME IN THE FOOD STAMP OFFICE
AND WORKING OUT DAY CARE FOR THE VICTIMS. MISS ROWE NOTED THAT A LOT
OF TIMES SUCH AN ASSAULT HAS THE EFFECT OF BRINGING SOMEONE INTO
CONTACT WITH A SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY THAT CAN SOLVE SOME OF THEIR
OTHER PROBLEMS, AND THEY ARE THERE TO BRING THESE PEOPLE INTO CONTACT
43
SEP 2 41980
Bou 4 4 mc 623
FF'_ I
SEP 2 41980 $oo 44 PAUGE-624
WITH EXISTING AGENCIES. SHE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE SEXUAL
ASSAULT TEAM IS INTO ITS SIXTH YEAR IN PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THEY
HAVE FOUR PROFESSIONAL STAFF AND CLERICAL HELPERS,
COMMISSIONER LOY INFORMED MISS ROWE THAT OUR COMMUNITY IS
KNOWN FOR ITS VOLUNTEERS, BUT NOTED THAT THESE PROGRAMS SEEM TO HAVE
A TENDENCY TO REQUIRE MORE AND MORE PROFESSIONALS AND WHILE THE AMOUNT
BEING REQUESTED OF THE BOARD IS SMALL AT THIS TIME, IT DOES TEND TO
GROW.
MISS ROWE STATED THAT YOU DO NEED PROFESSIONALS TO COORDINATE
THE VOLUNTEERS; ALSO, THE PROFESSIONALS CAN GIVE A STAMP OF APPROVAL
TO THE VOLUNTEER AND THUS MAKE THEM MORE ACCEPTABLE TO THE COURT
AGENCIES AND THE POLICE SYSTEM. SHE DID FEEL THE PLAN SUGGESTED IS
THE WAY TO GO AND COULD BE EFFECTIVE IN THE FOUR COUNTY AREA.
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED WHEN THEY PLANNED TO PUT THIS PROGRAM
INTO EFFECT, AND MR. STONE SAID THAT IT WOULD BE AS SOON AS THEY COULD
GET THE MONEY AND HIRE THE MOST QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL THEY COULD GET.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE INQUIRED HOW THIS $25,000 WOULD BREAK
DOWN AS TO SALARY AND BENEFITS, AND STATE ATTORNEY STONE EXPLAINED
THE $25,000 WOULD BE ALL FOR THE PROFESSIONAL COORDINATOR - SALARY,
BENEFITS, EXPENSES, SUPPLIES, ETC.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THEY CAN CARRY OUT THIS PROGRAM
WITH THE SPACE THEY HAVE AND NOT COME BACK AND ASK FOR MORE, AND
MR, STONE STATED THAT ALL HE COULD SAY WAS THAT THEY WOULD NOT COME
BACK AND ASK FOR MORE SPACE FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT IF THE BOARD DOES CHOOSE
TO FUND THE PROGRAM THAT IT NOT BE FUNDED WITH A BUDGET AMENDMENT
WHICH WOULD PUT OUR It YEAR -ENDS It OUT OF KILTER. HE STATED THAT HIS
PERSONAL FEELING IS THAT RAPE IS ONE OF THE MOST HEINOUS OF CRIMES
AND THIS IS A VERY WORTHWHILE PROGRAM.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER LOY, TO HONOR THE REQUEST OF THE STATE ATTORNEY FOR A
CONTRIBUTION OF $6,250 TO HELP ESTABLISH THE SEXUAL ASSAULT TEAM, AND
TO TAKE THE MONEY FROM CONTINGENCY AND MAKE IT PART OF NEXT YEAR'S
BUDGET.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED THIS PROGRAM IS WORTHWHILE AND
BELIEVED OUR AREA WILL BE VERY SUPPORTIVE OF SUCH A PROGRAM, BUT
EXPRESSED THE HOPE THAT IT WON T GROW OUT OF PROPORTION ADMINISTRATIVELY
AND THAT THE ABSOLUTE BULK OF THE DOLLARS CAN BE USED IN GETTING THE
ASSISTANCE TO THE PERSON WHO NEEDS IT.
MRS. ANN PANACCION, REPRESENTING THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION
OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN AND HERSELF, AS AN INTERESTED CITIZEN AND A SOCIAL
WORKER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD. SHE EMPHASIZED THAT WE DO NEED
PROFESSIONAL HELP BECAUSE VOLUNTEERS ARE NOT ALWAYS ABLE TO WORK ON
THEIR OWN. SHE STATED THAT HER GROUP SUPPORTS THE PROGRAM AND
BELIEVES IT IS A MUCH NEEDED ONE TO COPE WITH THIS SERIOUS AND GROWING
PROBLEM.
STATE ATTORNEY STONE EXPLAINED THAT THE COORDINATOR WILL BE
A PROFESSIONAL WHO IS QUALIFIED IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA, AND WE WILL
HAVE ACCESS TO OTHER PROFESSIONALS. HE COULD NOT SAY THAT DOWN THE
LINE WE WILL NOT HAVE TO HIRE ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL, BUT NOTED THAT
THEY WOULD HAVE TO SHOW THE NEED. MR. STONE POINTED OUT THAT SOME
OF THE VOLUNTEERS WILL BE PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE THEMSELVES AND ASSURED
THE BOARD THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO MAKE THIS A BIG GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE & NECESSITY --ODOM AVIATION APPROVED
THE NEW OWNER OF ODOM AVIATION, INC., RICHARD MCCLEARY,
CAME BEFORE THE BOARD IN REGARD TO THEIR REQUEST FOR RENEWAL OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF NECESSITY.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE HAS NOTED THAT THEY HAVE
MADE A CONTINUING UPGRADING IN EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES, AND HE WOULD
BE PLEASED TO APPROVE A RENEWAL OF THE CERTIFICATE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY, TO ODOM AVIATION, INC. FOR THEIR AIR
AMBULANCE SERVICE FOR THE YEAR 1981, WITH THE SAME PROVISION AS
CONTAINED IN THE PAST.
45
ao� 1'E n
SEP 2 41980
A
NC
m ��\\\\\II•a��' I N1EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
WHEREAS, the ODOM AVIATION, INC. AIR Ambutanee Sehvice p&avida
qua.P.ity eme&genet' m2 e .6enviceea o e &Wzens a INDIAN RIVER County;
and,
WHEREAS, th.e&e hays been demonst&ated that there a a need 4a& this ambu.P.a.nee .6ehv ice
to ope&ate .in thio county to phov i de ezz entiat a env icu to the ci ti.zems o f this
County; and,
WHEREAS, the above ambuta.nce de&viee has indicated that it witt comply with aU the
nequi&ement-s of the Eme&g eney Med icat Se&v ica Act o f 1973, the Boa&d o6 County
Comm-i&sioneu a6 INDIAN RIVER County hereby .izzues a Cel, 6i.cate of Pubti.c
Convenience and Necu y to ZM a—m-FuTfance company jo& the yea& 1981
air
In .ussu,tng this evWjieate it is undeutood that the above named/ambutan.ee .aenvice
Witt meet the %equiAeme a j State Legistati.on and p&ovc.de eme&gency seAvices on
a twenty-4ou& houA basis 6o& the jottowing area (.a) :
Indian River County. This CERTIFICATE is issued subject to the
right of Piper Aircraft Company continuing; to provide emergency and
non -emergency flights as thev have customarily done in the oast.
701K -A 111F•
i I L/ /1 r
i 1
• 1•' • i0 Expires 31st day of December,•i
cNa
Ci -
W
Cn
1
r�
REQUEST BY HUMANE SOCIETY FOR COUNTY LAND - BOARD AGREED TO
BARBARA NOLTE, PRESIDENT OF THE HUMANE SOCIETY, APPEARED
BEFORE THE BOARD IN REGARD TO THEIR REQUEST FOR COUNTY LAND FOR
THEIR FACILITIES.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT TELEPHONE CALLS
HAVE BEEN RECEIVED FROM MRS. JAMES CALDWELL AND MR. AND MRS. JAMES
EDEN INDICATING THEIR SUPPORT OF THE HUMANE SOCIETY'S REQUEST, AND
MRS. NOLTE INDICATED THERE WERE QUITE A FEW CITIZENS PRESENT IN THE
AUDIENCE ALSO SUPPORTIVE OF THE REQUEST.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT BASICALLY THEIR REQUEST IS FOR
CONSIDERATION IN REGARD TO A PARCEL OF LAND ON THE OLD COUNTY LANDFILL
ON SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD. THE ADMINISTRATORS STAFF HAS NO OBJECTION
TO THE GRANTING OF THE REQUEST PROVIDING THE BUILDING OF THE FACILITY
IS DONE PROPERLY BECAUSE BUILDING ON LANDFILL SITES CALLS FOR CERTAIN
PRECAUTIONS IN THE ENGINEERING.
MRS. NOLTE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY ARE AWARE OF THE
ADDED COST INVOLVED IN BUILDING ON SUCH A SITE, SHE STATED THAT
ARCHITECT CHARLES BLOCK HAS INDICATED THAT IF THEY WERE TO PUT THE
MONEY INTO BUYING THE LAND AND THEN HAD THE ADDED BUILDING COSTS,
IT MIGHT PROVE TO BE TOO MUCH, AND SUGGESTED THAT POSSIBLY A LEASE
COULD BE WORKED OUT, WHICH WOULD MAKE IT MORE FEASIBLE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE STATUTES READ THAT
BEFORE THE COUNTY CAN SELL OR LEASE, THEY MUST PUT THE PROPERTY OUT
FOR BID. IF THERE IS A PARTICULAR USE IN MIND, GENERALLY THERE ARE
NO OTHER BIDDERS AND ALSO THE COUNTY IS NOT NECESSARILY OBLIGATED TO
TAKE THE LOW BID IF THERE IS AN OVERRIDING PUBLIC INTEREST.
MRS. NOLTE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY REALLY HAVE PUT A
LOT OF RESEARCH IN LOOKING FOR A SITE AND ARE COMING TO THE BOARD
AS AN ABSOLUTE LAST RESORT, SHE FELT IT IS ABOUT THE LAST PIECE
THEY KNOW OF CLOSE ENOUGH TO BUILD A SHELTER WHERE THEY CAN DO THE
JOB PROPERLY.
47
SEP 2 41980 44
SEP 2 41900 aw 44
628
DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
SITE IN THE OLD LANDFILL PROPERTY, AND ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED
THAT THEY HAVE NOT ACTUALLY'SPECIFIED A PARTICULAR 5 TO 7 ACRES OUT
OF THE 60 ACRE SITE. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY HAVE CLOSED THE LANDFILL
AND ARE IN THE PLANTING PROCESS AT THIS TIME.
COMMISSIONER LYONS HOPED THAT WE WOULD HAVE SOME KIND OF A
GENERAL IDEA OF WHAT WE PLAN TO DO WITH THAT PROPERTY SO THAT IF WE
DO MAKE THIS PIECE AVAILABLE TO THE HUMANE SOCIETY, IT WOULD NOT
INTERFERE WITH ANY OTHER LONG TERM USE WE MIGHT HAVE. HE DID BELIEVE
IT WAS A GOOD LOCATION FOR THEM IF THE RIGHT CORNER COULD BE FOUND.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT SEVERAL PEOPLE HAVE INDICATED
TO HIM THAT IT WOULD BE AN APPROPRIATE AREA FOR A PERMANENT COUNTY
FAIRGROUND, AND IF THAT IS IN THE BACK OF OUR MINDS, HE FELT WE SHOULD
LOOK TO THE WEST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY FOR THE HUMANE SOCIETY.
COMMISSIONER Loy CONFIRMED THAT THE HUMANE SOCIETY IS
CRAMPED FOR SPACE, THAT THEY HAVE SCOUTED THE COUNTY LOOKING FOR A
LOCATION, AND HAVE COME TO THE BOARD -AS A LAST RESORT. SHE NOTED
THAT EVERY TIME WE HAVE DISCUSSED A USE FOR THIS LANDFILL PROPERTY,
IT HAS BEEN WITH THE IDEA OF SAVING IT FOR AN OPEN AREA FOR RECREATION,
CARNIVALS, ETC., BUT SHE FELT THE MAIN PROBLEM WITH THE HUMANE
SOCIETY'S PARTICULAR SITUATION RELATES TO THE LANDS INABILITY TO
SUPPORT STRUCTURES AND THE RESULTANT EXPENSE OF BUILDING THERE. SHE
WAS HOPEFUL THAT IF THE BOARD DID APPROVE THEIR REQUEST, THAT 3-5
ACRES COULD BE FOUND IN AN OUTLYING AREA OF THE OLD LANDFILL WHERE
IT MIGHT BE LESS EXPENSIVE TO BUILD AND WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED SHE BELIEVED THAT WE HAVE, I N THE
PAST, MADE LANDS AVAILABLE TO ORGANIZATIONS ON A LEASE BASIS.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE IS IN FAVOR OF THE LEASE.
HE DID NOT BELIEVE WE HAD USED 100% OF ALL THE LAND IN THE OLD LANDFILL.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT BEFORE THE LANDFILL CLOSED
DOWN, WE WERE OPERATING ON LEASED LAND FROM THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
AND WHILE THERE WERE LANDS THAT WERE NOT USED, THEY ARE NOT OUR
LAND. SHE BELIEVED ANY UNUSED LAND REMAINING IS UNDER THE JURIS-
DICTION OF THE AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.
I
m
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON CONFIRMED THAT EVERY PART OF THE COUNTY
LAND, EXCEPT THE PARKING LOT FOR THE COUNTY GARAGE HAD BEEN COVERED
OVER AND HAS GARBAGE UNDER IT, EVEN THE ROADBED.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REALIZED THE HUMANE SOCIETY IS VERY
DEDICATED AND HAS WORKED VERY HARD, BUT HE FELT WE DO NEED TO DO SOME
STUDIES TO SEE IF THERE IS AN AREA THAT WILL SUIT THEIR PURPOSES AND
STILL LEAVE THE REMAINING AREA SO IT CAN BE UTILIZED.
COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT THE HUMANE SOCIETY NEEDS
TO KNOW IF WE WOULD GO AHEAD WITH THE LEASE IF A SUITABLE LOCATION
CAN BE FOUND, AND THE BOARD MEMBERS INDICATED THEY HAD NO PROBLEM WITH
A LEASE.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGAIN EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE COST
OF CONSTRUCTION ON THAT TYPE OF LAND,
MRS. NOLTE ASKED HOW OLD THE OLDEST PART OF THE LANDFILL
IS, AND ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DID NOT KNOW WITHOUT CHECKING. HE
SUGGESTED THAT PERHAPS, HE, MRS. NOLTE,AND ARCHITECT CHARLES BLOCK
COULD LOOK OVER THE AREA WITH ROAD & BRIDGE SUPERINTENDENT HAMILTON
AND COME UP WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF A PARTICULAR AREA. HE POINTED
OUT THAT THERE IS ALSO THE PROBLEM OF INGRESS AND EGRESS AS WELL AS
SITE LOCATION.
ARCHITECT CHARLES BLOCK ARRIVED AT THE MEETING, AND THE
CHAIRMAN INFORMED HIM THAT THE BOARD IS RECEPTIVE TO THE HUMANE
SOCIETY'S PROPOSAL, BUT HAS RESERVATIONS ABOUT THE SUITABILITY OF THE
LAND. HE STATED THEY WOULD PREFER THE LEASE OVER PURCHASE,
MR. BLOCK INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THERE DEFINITELY ARE
PROBLEMS WITH BUILDING AT THIS SITE, BUT NOTHING MONEY COULDN'T SOLVE.
HE NOTED THE BUILDING THE HUMANE SOCIETY IS TALKING ABOUT IS NOT VERY
LARGE, AND IF SOME SITE COULD BE FOUND WHICH WASN'T USED FOR GARBAGE,
IT WOULD BE HELPFUL. HE CONTINUED THE OTHER PROBLEM IS THAT THE DUMP
DOES PUT OUT SOME GASES, BUT IF AN AREA COULD BE FOUND IN THE OLDEST,
LONGEST COVERED PART, THIS WOULD NOT BE A PROBLEM. HE NOTED BUILDING
WOULD ENTAIL USING A 12" SLAB VERSUS A 4" SLAB AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO
49
SEP 2 41980
amf 44 pma
SEP 2 41990
Bov 44 PAGE 630
SPAN POTENTIAL PROBLEM AREAS; THEY ALSO WOULD HAVE TO STEER CLEAR
OF A STUCCO BUILDING, WHICH COULD CRACK, AND GO WITH STEEL FRAMING
AND POSSIBLY WOOD SIDING.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT REQUESTED THAT MR. BLOCK WORK WITH THE
ADMINISTRATOR AND MRS. NOLTE IN INVESTIGATING THE LAND FOR SITES,
AND MR. BLOCK STATED THAT HE WOULD DO SO.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ASKED IF THEY SHOULD RESTRICT THEIR
INVESTIGATION OF SITES TO THE SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD AREA OR LOOK AT
OTHER SIMILAR AREAS
COMMISSIONER LOY BROUGHT UP THE POSSIBILITY OF CONSIDERING
A SITE BY THE COLLECTOR STATION ON NORTH WINTER BEACH ROAD. SHE
DID NOT BELIEVE THERE WOULD BE ANY CONSTRUCTION PROBLEM THERE, BUT
NOTED THAT MRS. NOLTE FELT THE DISTANCE OUT FROM THE CITY DID PLAY
AN IMPORTANT PART. COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT WHILE THIS SITE
MAY BE A LITTLE MORE NORTH THAN THE OLD DUMP SITE, IT IS CLOSER TO
U.S. #1 AND OLD DIXIE, WHICH ARE PAVED ROADS. SHE FELT IT, THEREFORE,
MIGHT BE A BETTER SITE; IT CERTAINLY WOULD BE EASIER TO BUILD ON; IT
WOULD BE LOCATED IN AN INDUSTRIAL ZONE; AND SHE FELT IT SHOULD BE
LOOKED INTO.
THE BOARD AGREED THAT WE SHOULD NOT BE RESTRICTED TO LOOKING
AT ONE SITE.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE LEFT THE MEETING TEMPORARILY AT 3:20
O`CLOCK P.M.
APPROVAL OF CASH BOND FOR VILLAGE GREEN, PHASE III - APPROVED
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REVIEWED THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN
REGARD TO VILLAGE GREENS BONDING REQUEST SET OUT IN HIS MEMO OF
SEPTEMBER 17TH, AS FOLLOWS:
50
September 17, 1980
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Neil A. Nelson, County Administrator
SUBJECT: Phase III - Village Green's Bonding Request -
.i
Encl. 1: Village Green's letter to Board of County
Commissioners dated September 2, 1980.
Encl. 2: Jim Young, P.E., Boindorf & Associates'
Bonding Value Statement, not dated.
Encl. 3: Planning Director's memo to County
Administrator dated September 12, 1980.
Encl. 4: Utility Director's memo to County
Administrator dated September 4, 1980.
Village Green, desiring to begin mobile home construction on the West side
of Phase III prior to completion of construction work, has requested permission
to bond the remaining construction project (see enclosure 1).
Jim Young has established a value of uncompleted projects with a 100/0, contingency
(see enclosure 2). This request was staffed to the County Attorney, Planning and
Zoning Department, and the Utility Department for comment.
Dave P,ever feels we should minimize bondinq because of the many problems
associated with this procedure. His comments are attached (see enclosure 3).
The County Attorney, by telephone, concurred with this position.
George Liner feels the amount for the Utility portion is adequate and
appropriate.
The Board has accepted bonding in the past. It has not been encouraged, and
each case was individually considered.
Village Green does have a nice development and serves a need to the community.
Acceptance of the bond will allow Village Green to begin construction of the mobile
homes immediately and facilitate the total development.
Recommendation: A. That t1he Roars accept a cash bond of X155,842.00
which rnpras nts "139,035-00 ...:.. to cover tha work
remaining, plus a 20'10 for contingency and price
escalation.
?. That upon substantial cOMD.letion (95%) of +1he project;
Vi 11 alae Green !>ri 7'; be al 1 e;:e�� to request that tate bony:
be returned, les--: aino;.:nt Set aside for minor ii 0rovements
not,}'et Cor"ol Ct2C•., contingencies, and price escalations .
C. That thie Finance Director be aut-hori zed to c or« i nate the
retl?rn of the bond money l -ii th represe =t1ti ves of "i 1 i aoe
Green. •.
"veil P,. Nelson
County +dmi ni strator
MR. NELSON NOTED THAT WHILE BONDING DOES CREATE SOME
ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS, VILLAGE GREEN HAS DONE AN OUTSTANDING JOB
AND DOES SERVE A NEED IN THE COMMUNITY. HE, THEREFORE, HAS RECOMMENDED
THE BOARD CONSIDER ACCEPTING A CASH BOND OF $166,842, THIS FIGURE
51 Boa 44 e►,cE 6�1
SEP 2 41980
SEP 2 41980
aoox 44 pAcE 632
ALLOWS FOR A 20% CONTINGENCY INSTEAD OF THE 10% THEY OFFERED, AND
MR. NELSON STATED THAT HE ADDED THE EXTRA 10% FOR ESCALATION PURPOSES►
HE POINTED OUT THAT THEY HAVE POSTED BOND FOR THE OTHER PHASES OF
THIS PROJECT, AND HE WAS NOT SURE WHAT THE IMPACT WOULD BE IF THEY WERE
NOT ALLOWED TO DO THIS.
MR. SILLS, VICE PRESIDENT OF VILLAGE GREEN, HAD NO OBJECTION
TO THE 20% CONTINGENCY. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IF THEY WERE NOT
ALLOWED TO POST BOND, IT WOULD SLOW THEIR CONSTRUCTION TIMETABLE BY
45 DAYS AND NOT LET PEOPLE MOVE IN WHO ARE SCHEDULED TO MOVE IN.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT UNDERSTOOD THAT, BUT WONDERED IF IT IS
REALLY THE BOARDS PROBLEM. HE NOTED WE ARE GOING TO BE FACED WITH
MORE AND MORE OF THESE ALL THE TIME.
MR. SILLS AGREED THAT IT IS NOT REALLY THE BOARDS PROBLEM,
BUT POINTED OUT THE COMMUNITY IS SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE IN SOME
AREAS AND THEY WOULD LIKE TO START CONSTRUCTION, IF POSSIBLE. HE HAD
FELT THERE WAS SOME PRECEDENCE FOR THIS.
COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED WHAT OUR PROBLEM IS IN ADMINISTERING
THIS, AND MR► NELSON FELT THAT ACTUALLY WE ARE UNDERWRITING THE
PROJECT. WE ARE SAYING WE WILL KEEP THE BOND TO ASSURE THE WORK IS
COMPLETED; IF SOMETHING HAPPENS AND THE WORK IS NOT COMPLETED, IT THEN
WOULD BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY TO GO BACK IN AND DO THE
JOB. IN ADDITION, THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT WOULD HAVE TO KEEP TRACK OF
THE MONEY AND REFUND IT UPON DEMAND AFTER COMPLETION. MR. NELSON
WENT ON TO EXPLAIN THAT THE DEVELOPER CANNOT MOVE THE PEOPLE INTO
THESE HOMES UNTIL THEY CAN GET A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, WHICH ONLY
CAN BE OBTAINED WHEN THEY ARE 95% COMPLETE, I.E., ALL THE ROADWAYS
ARE IN, THE WATER AND SEWER, THE ELECTRICITY, AND EVERYTHING IS
OPERATING. THE REMAINING 5% WOULD COVER DRESSING UP, GRASSING, ETC.,
BUT THIS WOULD NOT STOP OCCUPANCY.
COMMISSIONER LYONS DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE ADVANTAGE TO
THE DEVELOPER WHEN ALL THIS HAS TO BE DONE ANYWAY, AND ENGINEER YOUNG
EXPLAINED THAT WHEN THE BOND IS PUT UP, THEY CAN GO AHEAD AND PUT
52
® � r
THE MOBILE HOMES ON THE LOTS AND PROCEED TO PUT IN THE ELECTRICITY,
DRIVEWAYS, ETC., WHICH THEY COULD NOT DO OTHERWISE. THIS IS OF GREAT
ASSISTANCE TO THE DEVELOPER AND THE HOMEOWNER,
COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THIS DOES NOT MAKE THE COUNTY
STAFF ALMOST AT THE BECK AND CALL OF VILLAGE GREEN TO CHECK EVERY
TIME THEY THINK THEY HAVE REACHED THE 95%.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED IF WE HAD MULTIPLE WITHDRAWALS,
THAT WOULD BE THE SITUATION, BUT FORMER ADMINISTRATOR JACK JENNINGS
WANTED IT MADE A ONE TIME WITHDRAWAL AT THE TIME IT WAS 95% COMPLETE.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED EVEN IF IT IS 95% COMPLETE, WE
STILL MUST BE COVERED FOR THE REMAINDER. HE NOTED THAT IT IS NOT
VILLAGE GREEN THAT PRESENTS THE PROBLEM, BUT THE FACT THAT THERE WILL
BE SUCH REQUESTS FROM MANY DEVELOPERS. HE FELT THE COUNTY IS ASSUMING
A SECONDARY LIABILITY.
ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT IS TRUE, BUT HE FELT THE
ENGINEER IS ASSUMING PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY. HE BELIEVED THAT IN
GENERAL THE COUNTY SHOULD DISCOURAGE THIS SORT OF THING BECAUSE IT
DOES CREATE SOME ADMINISTRATIVE HASSLE THAT THE COUNTY IS NOT COMPENSATED
FOR.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ALSO FELT THIS SHOULD BE HANDLED ON A
CASE BY CASE BASIS AS HE WAS OF THE OPINION THERE ARE SOME DEVELOPERS
WE WOULD NOT WANT TO BOND.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THERE SHOULD BE A TIME LIMIT FOR THE
WORK BEING COMPLETED BECAUSE OF THE RATE OF INFLATION, AND MR. SILLS
STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO A TIME LIMIT. HE FELT THEY
SHOULD BE FINISHED IN 30 DAYS, BUT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE 120 DAYS,
COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT WE HAVE SET UP A CERTAIN WORKING
RELATIONSHIP WITH THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPER. HE AGREED POSSIBLY WE
SHOULD CHANGE OUR WAY OF DOING BUSINESS, BUT FELT IT WOULD BE
CONSISTENT TO CONTINUE AS WE HAVE DONE WITH THIS DEVELOPER AND CHANGE
IT FOR OTHERS AS TIME GOES ON.
CHAIRMAN SIEBERT WISHED TO MAKE SURE THESE REQUESTS ARE
SCREENED CAREFULLY, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAS
DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY.
53 BOO
K� �� ���� �
SEP 2 41980
SEP 2 41980
600K 44 PAGE 6%34
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED THE ADMINISTRATORS RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE FINANCE DIRECTOR BE AUTHORIZED TO COORDINATE THE RETURN OF
THE BOND MONEY WITH VILLAGE GREEN, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE APPROVAL
OF THE RELEASE OF FUNDS COMES BACK TO THE BOARD.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ACCEPTANCE OF A CASH BOND
ON THE COMPLETION OF VILLAGE GREEN PHASE III WEST AS OUTLINED BY
ENGINEER JAMES W. YOUNG IN HIS MEMO OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1980, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $139,035 PLUS 20% CONTINGENCY, OR $166,842, FOR A PERIOD
NOT EXCEEDING 120 DAYS, WITH THE BOARD APPROVING THE RELEASE OF THE
FUNDS UPON 95% COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT AFTER INSPECTION BY THE
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, AND THAT THIS BE PUT INTO THE COUNTY'S STANDARD
CONTRACT FORM.
MR. SILLS CONFIRMED THEY WOULD ACCEPT THE $166,842 FIGURE.
EEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, Inc.
JAMES L. BEINDORF, P. E.
KENNETH W. DAMEROW
RICHARD B. VOTAPKA. P. E.
�v.' .111nom: I.
(..'.r S i,, i r ..d
BONDING
FOR
VILLAGE GREEN PHASE III WEST
3885 . 20Th STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 849
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 32960
TELEPHONE 305/562.7981
Includes improvements for all lots west of the lake and west of Lots 776, 866
and 821 with the exception of the "Cluster Area" (Lots 724 through 734 and
Lots 742 through 751), the sewage treatment plant and force main and deceleration
lane in State Road 60.
Work remaining based on Contract Prices.
ITEM
Sewer Mains
Manholes
Double Services (Sewer)
Single Services (Sewer)
Lift Station
Water Mains
Gate Valves and Boxes
54
AMOUNT TO BE BONDED
$ 0
319
0
0
8,900
0
Fire Hydrants
Fittings and Miscellaneous (Water)
Double Services (Water)
Single Services (Water)
Storm Sewer
Curb Inlets
ITEM
Catch Basins
Drainage Manholes
Drainage Junction Box
Special Curb Inlet
12" Stab. Subgrade (S.R. 60)
= 6" Stab. Subgrade
8" Limerock Base (S.R. 60)
6" Soil Cement Base
6" Shoulder (S.R. 60)
Fill for State Road 60
Grassing and Mulching (S.R. 60)
2" Asphaltic Surface (S.R. 60)
1" Asphaltic Surface
Miami Curb and Gutter
Valley Gutters
10% Contingencies
�JJes4]VV
P.tember 980
SEP 2 41980
0
0
0
0
2,202
300
AMOUNT TO BE BONDED
$ 0
0
0
20
5,628
4,334
10,840
57,020
663
1,600
760
7,723
32,970
3,000
2,756
$139,035
13,905
$152,940
SOAK 44 PA --635'
SEP 2 41980 BOOK 44 PACE 636
DISCUSSION RE LEASE RE EXCHANGE HOME - APPROVED FOR ADVERTISING
WITH CHANGES
ATTORNEY COLLINS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED LEASE FOR THE
EXCHANGE YOUTH HOME SUBMITTED BY ATTORNEY CIANFRONE AND INFORMED THE
BOARD HE WAS LOOKING FOR AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE EVEN THOUGH HE
REALIZED THE LEASE COULD NOT BE SIGNED TODAY.
COMMISSIONER LYONS QUESTIONED THE 99 -YEAR TERM OF THE LEASE,
AND ALSO ON PAGE 2, CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS, HE FELT IT SHOULD
SPECIFY THAT THE HOUSING FACILITY WILL "PROVIDE LIVING SPACE IN A
HOMELIKE ATMOSPHERE TO MINORS. If HE POINTED OUT THAT WE DO NOT WISH
TO BUILD AN INSTITUTION. COMMISSIONER LYONS THEN NOTED THAT THE LEASE
SAYS THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID HOUSING FACILITY SHALL INCLUDE "A
SUBSTANTIAL HEAVILY WOODED, LANDSCAPED OUTDOOR AREA, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE "
SINCE THAT IS THE TYPE OF AREA INVOLVED, HE DID NOT FEEL THE "IF AT
ALL POSSIBLE It SHOULD BE IN THERE AS IT MIGHT BE AN INVITATION TO CUT
THE TREES DOWN�AND IF AT A LATER DATE THEY WANTED TO EXPAND, WE WOULNDIT
HAVE THE SAME ATMOSPHERE WE STARTED OUT WITH.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THIS LEASE IS ALMOST WORD
FOR WORD THE SAME AS THE LEASE FOR ST. FRANCIS MANOR. THE GROUP
ENVISIONED GOING BACK AND OBTAINING MORTGAGE MONEY TO BUILD THE
STRUCTURE. THE COUNTY IS NOT SUBORDINATING ITS INTEREST IN THE LAND
FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE MORTGAGE MONEY, BUT IT IS WITHIN THE REALM OF
POSSIBILITY THAT THE BANK COULD FORECLOSE ON THE BUILDING AND THE
IMPROVEMENTS AND SOME OTHER TENANT COULD BE IN THERE - THAT IS THE
RISK. ATTORNEY COLLINS ALSO QUESTIONED THE TERM OF THE LEASE AND
FELT THE FINANCING WOULD NOT REQUIRE MORE THAN A SO, OR POSSIBLY 40
YEAR TERM.
COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE LEASE ON THE SUNSHINE CENTER
WAS FOR 40 YEARS,
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT WE SHOULD SPECIFY A TIME PERIOD
WHEREIN THEY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONSTRUCT THE PREMISES, AND IF
THEY DON T, WE TERMINATE,
HE ALSO FELT WE NEED TO BETTER DEFINE THE
USE OF THE PROPERTY.
HE STATED THAT HE WILL GO OVER THIS WITH ATTORNEY
CIANFRONE AND HAVE MORE INPUT WITH THE BOARD.
COMMISSIONER Loy CONCURRED THAT THERE SHOULD BE A TIME FRAME
WHEREIN SOMETHING HAS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED, AND AGREED THAT THE PHRASE
"IF AT ALL POSSIBLE" ON PAGE 2 SHOULD BE STRICKEN AS IT RELATED TO
THE HEAVILY WOODED OUTDOOR AREA. SHE FURTHER FELT THERE SHOULD BE
WORDING BETTER SPECIFYING THAT WE WOULD LIKE IT TO LOOK LIKE A HOME
AND NOT AN INSTITUTION. THE CHAIRMAN SUGGESTED THAT WE HAVE FINAL
APPROVAL OVER THE ARCHITECT, AND IT WAS AGREED WE WANT TO BE SURE
THAT IT IS A HOMELIKE SPOT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT TO THE BOARD THAT ST. FRANCIS
MANOR WAS LEASED AT $1,000 A YEAR, AND THIS IS TO BE $1.00 A YEAR.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
LYONS, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE
FOR BIDS ON LEASING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO FINISH THE LEASE
UP LEGALLY WITH WHAT THE BOARD WANTS IN IT AS JUST DISCUSSED.
SOUTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT - RESOLUTIONS 50-1 AND 80-2
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECESSED AT
4:00 O'CLOCK P.M. AND RECONVENED AT 4:01 O'CLOCK P.M. ACTING AS THE
DISTRICT BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS OF THE SOUTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FIRE DISTRICT.
57
SEP 2 41900
BOOK- 44 Pa�E 637