Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/1/1981WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 1981 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1053 20TH PLACE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 1981, AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE PATRICK B. LYONS, CHAIRMAN; WILLIAM C. WODTKE, .JR., VICE CHAIRMAN; DICK BIRD; AND ALFRED GROVER FLETCHER. ABSENT WAS DON C. SCURLOCK, .JR., WHO WAS OUT OF STATE DUE TO ILLNESS IN THE FAMILY. ALSO PRESENT WERE NEIL A. NELSON, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, SJR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; .JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE DIRECTOR; DAN FLEISCHMAN, BAILIFF; AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERK. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING, TO ORDER. CHAIRMAN LYONS LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, AND CHAPLAIN J. C. GLENN, INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GAVE THE INVOCATION. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO ADD AN ITEM FOR DISCUSSION RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND AN ITEM RE APPROVAL OF OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR COMMISSION MEMBER OR REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ADDITION OF THESE EMERGENCY ITEMS TO THE AGENDA. LW43,11alml;.��•� THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE CORRECTED SHEET AND REVISED FIGURES PRESENTED FOR THE PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENT TO TRANSFER FUNDS FOR INTEREST DUE ON BONDS TO THE DEBT SERVICE FUND. FINANCE OFFICER BARTON EXPLAINED THE,REVISION IN FIGURES WAS CAUSED BY ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING AS RELATED TO THE DATE OF PAYMENT. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT INTEREST APPARENTLY WAS ACCRUED IN THE WRONG ACCOUNT, AND THIS IS A BOOKKEEPING TRANSACTION. ON MOTION,BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOLLOWING BUDGET AMENDMENT TRANSFERRING FUNDS FOR INTEREST DUE ON BONDS TO THE DEBT SERVICE FUND: ' ACCOUNT TITLE B.C.C. Contingencies Interest -Debt Service Interest -Debt Service Interest -Debt Service ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE 301-130-513-99.91 93,978- 301-130-519-77.21 75,270 301-131-519-77.21. 18,708 202-117-513-77.22. 93,978 Cash Forward -Sept 30 202-117-513-99.92 93,978 ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED RETRO -ACTIVE APPROVAL OF THE ADMISSION OF JOSEPH MARSHALL TO THE A. G. HOLLEY STATE HOSPITAL. ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE BOARDS RESPONSIBILITY FOR PAYING SUCH MEDICAL BILLS APPLIES ONLY TO INDIGENTS WHO ARE ADMITTED TO A REGIONAL HOSPITAL, AND THERE ARE CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS. CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT UNDER THE DISASTER PLAN, THE CHAIRMAN IS RESPONSIBLE DURING HURRICANES, AND HE FELT THE BOARD SHOULD AUTHORIZE SOMEONE TO ATTEND THE HURRICANE CONFERENCE TO BE HELD IN ST. PETERSBURG. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED THAT THE CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR IS SCHEDULED TO ATTEND THIS MEETING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COMMISSION TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE TO BE HELD APRIL 22-24, 1981, IN ST. PETERSBURG. APR11�38� DISCUSSION RE RESOLUTION 81-15 AND LETTER WRITTEN TO THE 10:423.14 0_0 WNalW9161i011 ` 'COMMISSIONER WODTKE PASSED OUT A COPY OF THE SPEECH MADE BY THE GOVERNOR TO REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS IN ORLANDO IN .JANUARY, SETTING OUT HIS APPROACH TO REGIONALISM. HE CONTINUED THAT WE DID SUBMIT A RESOLUTION (#81-15) TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL IN REGARD TO THE COMMISSION'S FEELING ABOUT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS DID THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. THIS RESOLUTION WAS ENTERED INTO THE OFFICIAL RECORD AND WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE REGIONAL PROCESS, COMMISSIONER WODTKE THEN STATED THAT HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE LAST PARAGRAPH IN A LETTER DATED MARCH 24, 1981, WRITTEN BY CHAIRMAN LYONS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS WHEREIN THE CHAIRMAN STATED THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WOULD BE ASKING THEM TO REQUIRE BINDING LETTERS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORTH BEACH AREA OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. COMMISSIONER WODTKE DID NOT BELIEVE THIS HAD BEEN DISCUSSED.BY THE BOARD, AND HE DID NOT FEEL IT IS THE PLACE OF THIS COUNTY TO MAKE SUCH A REQUEST SINCE HE BELIEVED ST. LUCIE COUNTY FELT THAT WE ARE MEDDLING IN A LOT OF THEIR AFFAIRS. CHAIRMAN LYONS DID NOT FEEL HIS LETTER INDICATED THAT THIS WAS AN OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE BOARD, BUT RATHER THAT IT WAS HIS OWN PERSONAL FEELING. COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT THE LETTER IN QUESTION USED THE WORD "WE," AND CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD BE GLAD TO AMEND THE LETTER USING THE WORD "I." HE COMMENTED THAT HE FELT PERFECTLY FREE TO "MEDDLE" IN THE AFFAIRS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY IF HE FELT THEY HAVE AN ADVERSE AFFECT ON INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. .EASE FOR SPACE IN POCAHONTAS BUILDING ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE LEASE FOR SPACE IN THE POCAHONTAS BUILDING FOR THE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENTS APR 11981 ROCK 46 rash179 3 __ L r 3 1 APR 1 ���1 8ddf� PAGE, WILL EXPIRE APRIL 31ST. HE REPORTED THAT HE HAS CONTACTED THE LAND— LORD, AND SHE IS AGREEABLE TO EXTENDING THE LEASE ANOTHER YEAR AT THE SAME TERMS AND ADDING A 60—DAY CANCELLATION CLAUSE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE LEASE FOR SPACE IN THE POCAHONTAS BUILDING FOR AN ADDITIONAL YEAR AT THE SAME RATE, AS OUTLINED BY THE ATTORNEY, WITH THE ADDITION OF A 60—DAY CANCELLATION CLAUSE, AND APPROVED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN. It - . 11 LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this 1st day of r �! April 1981, by and between GARNETT L. MAHER d/b/a/ I; i; IPOCAHANTAS APARTMENT, party of the first part, hereinafter 0 AFI 11,918 'referred to as "Lessor" and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, party of the second part, :hereinafter called the "Lessee". W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, on January 7, 1976, the Lessor and Lessee entered into a Lease Agreement whereby Lessor leased to Lessee an aggregate area of 2000 square feet of useable space in the Pocahantas Apartments located at 2121- 14th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, said lease commencing on the 1st day of February 1976 to and including the 31st day of January, 1977 with an option to renew said Lease Agreement for two years at,,the rental of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) per month, a copy of said Lease Agreement is hereby attached hereto and by reference incor- porated herein; and WHEREAS, said lease renewal period terminated on the 31st day of January, 1980; and WHEREAS, said Lease was extended by Lease Extension Agreement, dated the 9th day of January, 1980, between the parties, said extension period to terminate on the 9th day of April, 1981; and WHEREAS, the Lessor and Lessee desire to extend said Lease Agreement for a period of twelve (12) months; NOW, THEREFORE, the Lessor and Lessee mutually agree that the Lease Agreement entered into between the parties on the 7th day of January, 1976, as extended by Lease Extension Agreement between the parties dated the 9th day of January, 1980, is hereby extended for a period of twelve ("12) months from the 9th day of April, 1981 under the same terms and conditions as contained in said Lease and Lease Extension Agreement, copies 'of which are incorporated by reference. LAW OFFICES OF COLLINS, BROWN, CALDWELL & EVANS P. O. BOX 3686 - 744 BEACHLAND BOULEVARD - VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 PHONE 231-4343 P. O. BOX 266 - 221 NORTH U. S. NO. 1 - SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 32958 PHONE 589-3156 nor 46 PACE 1��. a PSE The parties further agree that, the Lessee, may after sixty (60) days written notice to Lessor, terminate this Lease Extension Agreement at any time during said extension (period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the above instrument for the purposes therein expressed on the day !and year first above written. .Signed, sealed and delivered in t e pr ee ce _ LESSOR: j 06inett L. Maher d/b/a Pocahantas -7 j`Apartments nett M. y t IND By/ LAW OFFICES OF COLLINS, BROWN, CALDWELL & EVANS P_ O. BOX 3686 - 744 BEACHLAND BOULEVARD - VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 ONE 231-4343 P. O. BOX 266 - 221 . 5. NO. 1 - SEBASTIAN, FLORIDA 3295 PHONE 589-3156 AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE PUBLIC BEARING RE ORDINANCE REGULATING �. W,,. . .. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT A COPY OF THE ORDINANCE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH TO REGULATE THE SALE OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA IS ENCLOSED IN THE AGENDA PACKET, AND OBVIOUSLY IT IS BENEFICIAL TO HAVE AS MUCH UNIFORMITY AS POSSIBLE. CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THAT HE HAS TALKED TO SHERIFF DOBECK, WHO BELIEVED THAT A LOT OF PROBLEMS HAD BEEN OVERCOME WITH THE REDOING OF THE VERO BEACH ORDINANCE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO MAKING THE RECEIPT OF INPUT FROM THE SHERIFF`S DEPARTMENT ON MATTERS PERTAINING TO THAT DEPARTMENT PART OF OUR SET PROCEDURE. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER WODTKE, TO AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT OF A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE REGULATING THE SALE OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA. CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE WORDING OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND HOW ITS INTERPRETATION MIGHT AFFECT THE OPERATION OF A DRUGSTORE OR PIPE AND TOBACCO STORE, FOR INSTANCE, OR THOSE PEOPLE WHO MUST USE HYPODERMIC NEEDLES IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR ALLERGIES. IT WAS AGREED THOSE QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED AT THE TIME OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC BEARING RE AMENDING SEC. 24-42 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE - (STANDARDS FOR INSTALLATION OTANKS) THE HOUR OF 9:00 A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: IPPR 11981 7 Poo 46, APR 11 981 Boa PAOE18 VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: _ STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on cath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach r in -Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a_4 in the matter of _kg4ea _�zz, 44 - 412- f in the Court, was pub - lisped in said newspaper in the issues of p ,?/ Affiant further, says that the said Vero Beach Press.Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said 'newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper, Q,Q' Sworn to and subscribed before me th*�7Ty Of --- A.D. n NOTICE I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, will hold a public hearing on April 1, 1981, at 9:00 A.M., in the City Council Chambers in the Vero Beach City Hall to consider the adoption of an • Ordinance amending Section 24-42 Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances Standards for Installation of Septic Tank by providing for installation of approved septic ; tanks only; and providing for a minimum setback from County gravity -sewer tines; and providing for -a limitation of the number of living units per acre where a development contains both wells and septic tanks; and I providing for limitations from the use of septic tanks ' for multi -family buildings and com- mercial buildings; and providing for in- corporation of Department of Environmental Regulation and County Health Department rules and regulations where these rules are more restrictive; and providing for an ef- fectivedate. .,... •.,.....;.... , If any person decides to appeal any decision made `_Un the above matter, he will need a record! of the proceedings, and for such pur- poses, he may need to insure that a verbatim. record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony in evidence on.. Which the appeal is based. Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida By: -s -Patrick B. Lyons, Chairman Mar. 13, 1981. - - V r-F— i(S Viness Manager) (SEAL) % = ;: = (Clerk of the Circuit C , Indian River County, Florida) ATTORNEY COLLINS GAVE THE BACKGROUND LEADING UP TO THE REQUEST FOR A CLARIFICATION OF THIS SECTION OF THE CODE AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT COMMISSIONER FLETCHER HAS RESEARCHED HOW OTHER COUNTIES HANDLE THIS SITUATION AND HAS COME ACROSS SOME FAR-REACHING ORDINANCES; PALM BEACH COUNTY, IN PARTICULAR, GOES FAR BEYOND WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH WITH THIS ORDINANCE. THE ATTORNEY CONTINUED -THAT THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT CAME UP WITH ADDITIONAL RECOM- MENDATION AFTER THE PACKET HAD BEEN PREPARED FOR THE AGENDA, AND THAT IS WHY THE NEW DRAFT WAS RECEIVED LATE. CHAIRMAN LYONS NOTED THAT THE FIRST DRAFT WAS FOR 4 UNITS PER ACRE WHILE THE NEW ONE IS FOR TWO UNITS PER ACRE, HE QUESTIONED WHETHER THE ADVERTISEMENT ADEQUATELY COVERS THE NEW DRAFT. ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROVIDES FOR A LIMITATION OF THE NUMBER OF LIVING UNITS PER ACRE, BUT IS NOT SPECIFIC AS TO THE EXACT NUMBER, AND THEREFORE, THE RECOM- MENDATIONS FROM THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT FIT WITHIN THE ADVERTISEMENT. IF, HOWEVER, THE ORDINANCE WERE EXPANDED AS PER THE MATERIAL FOUND BY MR. FLETCHER, HE THEN FELT WE SHOULD HAVE TO READVERTISE. CHAIRMAN LYONS ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. WALTER BURKETT, INTERESTED CITIZEN, COMMENTED THAT WHILE THERE WAS NO MENTION OF A SPECIFIC NUMBER IN THE PUBLISHED NOTICE, HE BELIEVED THE FIGURE OF FOUR UNITS HAD BEEN MENTIONED ON RADIO BROADCASTS. ALLEN WATTERS, OF THE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT STAFF, WISHED TO CLARIFY ABOUT TWO UNITS VS. FOUR UNITS. HE NOTED THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES - INDIVIDUAL WELLS AND INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC TANKS ON DRAINFIELDS. MR. WATTERS EXPLAINED THAT PER STATE STATUTE ON ANY LOT PLATTED AFTER 1971, YOU MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 1/2 ACRE TO HAVE A WELL AND SEPTIC TANK. SINCE THE STATE LIMITATION WAS MORE STRINGENT THAN THE COUNTY LIMITATION, THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT COULD NOT ALLOW 4 UNITS PER ACRE NO MATTER WHAT THE COUNTY ORDINANCE CALLED FOR. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THE NEW DRAFT PRESENTED MENTIONS 4 UNITS PER ACRE ON THE FRONT PAGE WHILE ON THE BACK, IT SETS OUT A LIMITATION OF 2 UNITS. ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE FIRST PART RECITES THE FORMER WORDING, AND THEN SETS OUT HOW IT IS TO BE AMENDED. THE QUESTION OF MULTI -FAMILY ON SEPTIC TANKS AND -WELLS AROSE, AND MR. WATTERS NOTED THAT STEP 2 SETS OUT THAT FOR MULTI- FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, THE FLOW SHALL:,BE NO MORE THAN 1200 GALLONS PER DAY PER ACRE. THE COUNTY ENGINEER WOULD DETERMINE THIS BY CONSULTING FLOW CHARTS. DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO WHETHER THERE WAS A STANDARD FLOW CHART OR WHETHER YOU COULD END UP GETTING DIFFERENT NUMBERS FROM DIFFERENT ENGINEERS. MR. WATTERS REPORTED THAT THE�STATE BREAKS IT DOWN PER BEDROOM, AND IT DOESNIT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IF YOU HAVE ONE TOILET 1 1981 9 Boa 4 6 F-AUFx85 _ �OE�K PAS€ P K 11981 IN A FIVE BEDROOM HOUSE. HE NOTED THAT A TWO BEDROOM HOUSE IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A 750 GALLON SEPTIC TANK; 3 BEDROOM - A 900 GALLON TANK; 4 BEDROOM - A 1,040 GALLON -TANK, AND THE SIZE OF THE DRAINFIELD INCREASES WITH EACH. ATTORNEY-COLLINS INQUIRED IF IT WERE POSSIBLE TO HAVE MORE THAN FOUR UNITS PER ACRE BASED ON A FORMULA OF NOT EXCEEDING 1200 GALLONS. MR. WATTERS STATED THAT YOU COULD GET A TOTAL OF FIVE BEDROOMS, BUT THIS HAS TO BE UNDER ONE ROOF, I.E., YOU COULD HAVE THREE UNITS WITH TWO BEDROOMS I.N'TWO AND ONE BEDROOM IN THE OTHER, OR POSSIBLY FIVE UNITS WITH ONE BEDROOM EACH. IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS FELT THAT SOME TYPE OF CHART BASED ON THE STATE FORMULA RE BEDROOMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE ORDINANCE SO THE APPLICANT CAN DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF UNITS HE WOULD BE ALLOWED WITHOUT HAVING TO GET AN ENGINEER TO FIGURE IT OUT, UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER POINTED OUT THAT WHILE THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS MORE RESTRICTIVE IN ONE AREA, IN ANOTHER AREA THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT IS MORE RESTRICTIVE. HE ASKED MR. WATTERS THE MOST NUMBER OF UNITS THAT WOULD FIT ON AN ACRE PER THE HEALTH DEPART- MENT INTERPRETATION. MR. WATTERS STATED THAT THEY COULD ACTUALLY PUT IN 4 UNITS WITH TWO BEDROOMS PER UNIT, OR S BEDROOMS PER ACRE. HE NOTED THAT HE CAN ACTUALLY GO ALL THE WAY UP TO 2,000 GALLONS - THAT IS HIS LIMITATION. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT COULD LIMIT THEMSELVES TO THE COUNTY ORDINANCE RATHER THAN THE STATE R REQUIREMENT, AND MR. WATTERS STATED THAT IF THE COUNTY'S ORDINANCE IS MORE LIMITING, THEY WOULD HAVE TO.,FOLLOW IT. e COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED HOW COMMISSIONER FLETCHER INTENDED TO PRESENT THE INFORMATION HE HAD RECEIVED FROM OTHER COUNTIES, AND COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED THAT HE WAS HOPING WE MIGHT CONTINUE THIS HEARING TO ANOTHER WEEK SO EACH BOARD MEMBER MIGHT HAVE TIME TO ABSORB THE NEW INFORMATION IN THE ORDINANCES FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY AND OTHER COUNTIES. CHAIRMAN LYONS AGREED THAT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED TODAY IS AN INCOMPLETE ORDINANCE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT REDRAFTED TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE VARIOUS THINGS WE HAVE HEARD TODAY. HE SUGGESTED THAT POSSIBLY MR. FLETCHER COULD HELP GET THE CONFLICTING VIEWPOINTS TOGETHER, AND WE CAN HAVE AN ORDINANCE THAT IS DEFENSIBLE AND CLEAR ENOUGH TO BE EASILY UNDERSTOOD, WHICH HE FELT WILL TAKE CONSIDERABLE MORE DETAIL. ATTORNEY STEPHEN FROMANG INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE REPRE- SENTS SEVERAL OWNERS OF SMALL LOTS AND NOTED THAT IN SUBDIVISIONS SUCH AS GROVERNOR ESTATES AND VERO BEACH HOMESITES WHERE THE LOTS MAY RANGE IN SIZE FROM 60 X 120 TO 70 x 100, PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE EFFECT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WOULD HAVE ON BUILDING ON THESE LOTS. ATTORNEY FROMANG STATED THAT IF THIS HEARING IS GOING TO BE CONTINUED TO A LATER DATE, HE WOULD RESERVE HIS REMARKS FOR THAT TIME. CHAIRMAN LYONS AGREED THIS PROBLEM SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AND NOTED IT IS POSSIBLE ONE ALTERNATIVE MIGHT BE THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO WAIT TO BUILD UNTIL THERE IS SEWER BECAUSE THERE COMES A TIME WHEN THE GROUND CANNOT ABSORB ANY MORE. ATTORNEY FROMANG STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO MEET WITH ALLEN WATTERS AND PREPARE A PRESENTATION. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER COMMENTED THAT IT HAD NOT BEEN HIS INTENT FOR THIS TO BE RETROACTIVE, BUT RATHER TO APPLY IT PRIMARILY TO NEW DEVELOPMENT. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT, SINCE WE ARE GOING TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE ORDINANCE SUBSTANTIALLY, IT WOULD BE PREFERABLE TO READVERTISE. f ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER FLETCHER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY AND STAFF TO MAKE REVISIONS IN THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE AND TO READVERTISE 11Boa 46 ^E 18 THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW IT, POSSIBLY THE FIRST MEETING IN MAY. QUIT -CLAIM DEED TO SCHOOL BOARD RE LOTS 3 & 10, BLOCK 96. MOX, w` APR 119g� FOR A HEARING AT A LATER DATE AFTER THE DRAFT HAS BEEN PREPARED AND THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW IT, POSSIBLY THE FIRST MEETING IN MAY. QUIT -CLAIM DEED TO SCHOOL BOARD RE LOTS 3 & 10, BLOCK 96. FELLSMERE ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD HAS WORKED OUT A SWAP WITH THE TOWN OF FELLSMERE WHICH INCLUDES LOTS 3-& 10, BLOCK 96. 'THE PROBLEM IS THAT WHILE THE SCHOOL BOARD HAS A RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSION IN DECEMBER OF 1945, IN FAVOR OF CONVEYING THOSE LOTS TO THE SCHOOL BOARD, THEY CANNOT LOCATE THE ACTUAL DEED. THEY ARE, THEREFORE, ASKING THAT THE COUNTY CONVEY WHATEVER INTEREST THEY MAY HAVE IN THESE LOTS PURSUANT TO THE 1945'' RESOLUTION. ATTORNEY COLLINS SAW NO HARM IN THE BOARD FOLLOWING THE INTENT OF THE 1945 RESOLUTION AND COMPLYING WITH THE SCHOOL BOARDS REQUEST. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER FLETCHER, TO RECOGNIZE THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE PREVIOUS COUNTY COMMISSION IN DECEMBER OF 1945, IN REGARD TO CONVEYING LOTS 3 & 10, BLOCK 961 TOWN OF FELLSMERE, TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP THE PROPER CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS; AND AUTHORIZE THE SIGNATURE OF THE CHAIRMAN. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE RESOLUTION TALKS ABOUT RESTRICTING THE USE OF THE PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL USE AND PURPOSES AND IN THE PROPOSED SWAP BETWEEN THE SCHOOL BOARD AND THE TOWN OF FELLSMERE, THE PROPERTY WOULD NO LONGER BE USED FOR SCHOOL PURPOSES. HE SUGGESTED THAT THE MOTION BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE AN ADDITION OF THE WORDING itANDFOR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES, It COMMISSIONER BIRD AGREED TO AMEND HIS MOTION TO INCLUDE THE WORDING SUGGESTED BY THE ATTORNEY, AND COMMISSIONER FLETCHER CONCURRED. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 'i THIS DEED, made this 1st day of April 1981, by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, party of the first part, and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, a corporate entity under the laws of the State of Florida, party of the second part, WITNESSETH that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of,,the sum of TEN and 00/100 ($10.00) DOLLARSi to it in hand paid by the party of the second part, receipt where- of is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the party of the second part, its heirs and assigns forever, the fol- lowing described land lying and being in Indian River County, Florida: Lots 3 and 10, Block 96 of the Town of Fellsmere IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said party of the first part has is - caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of it �I County Commissioners acting by the Chairman or Vice Chairman of i I said board, the day and year aforesaid. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RI COUNTY, FLORIDA ii !; ATTEST: BY / (SEAL) Chairman Clerk ' t mar. 4 WE 1$9 { THE HOUR OF 9:00 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published _at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a in the matter of in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of -- 0A1 - /,7 - 1,7`601 Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tiserrent; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. in Manager) (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, dian River County, Florida) III, PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 'tet s.' NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN that' the County Commission of Indian River County ? will hold a public hearing on April 1, 1981 at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Vero Beach City Hall at. 1053 20th 'Place,,'Verb. Beach, Florida, for the purpose of k 1. To review a proposal of the Indian River County Housing Authority requesting approval of a site for purchase to subdivide and develop for single-family ,lots , on the' following described. property' "located 'west of40th Avenue and approximately 250 feet north of North Gifford Road in Indian River County;' Florida, to wit: k+ ,;, The North 898 17 feet of the'Sorth 1198 i7 feet of that part of the SWUa of the SWI/4 of Section 22, Township 32 South, Range'39 East, lying West of Pine View Park Subdivision, less the East 90 feet of the North. 172.00 feet of the South 1198.17 feet of that part of the SWI/4 of the SWi/4 of Section 22, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, lying West of Pine View Park Sub-. division, all lying and being in Indian River, County, Florida,`s 2. A publichearing in relation thereto at which parties in interest and citizens shall have an opportunity to be heard. Board of County Commissioners' of Indian River County, Florida By: Patrick B. Lyons, Chairman " March 17, 1981. EDWARD REGAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, PRESENTED THE BOARD WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RE THE TREASURE COAST VILLAGE PROJECT AND NOTED THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BRING THEIR PROPOSED SITE TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL. TREASURE COAST VILLAGE PROJECT Information The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County transferred to the Indian River County Housing Authority its reservation under the Florida Rural Land Acquisition & Develop- ment Trust Fund. The reservation from the Land Trust Fund is for $400,000. The money is loaned to the Housing Authority for the acquisition and development of land. The loan bears inter- est at a rate of 3%, -.which helps keep the cost of development down. The finished lots are sold at cost for the development of a moderately priced home. To implement the program, the Housing Authority has optioned three parcels of land comprising 18.75+ acres located west of 40th Avenue and approximately 250' north of North Gifford Road. The options were obtained from the First Citrus Bank, Abco Sales & Construction and attorneys Charles Sullivan and William Cobb. The total cost of the land is $100,900. The land is currently zoned R-1, single-family residential housing. The Fund provides for the acquisition of land and the installation of water, sewer, drainage and streets. Treasure Coast Village will contain 71 single-family parcels. Our objective is to sell the improved single-family lots for approx- imately $6,000. This is consistent with the Farmers Home Administration 502 program. Lloyd C. Hoberg, their County Supervisor, advises me that the site is satisfactory. Once we have the roads, water and sewer in, they would be in a position to fund permanent mortgages. The program currently provides for a maximum of 13% interest to a low of 1% interest, depending on the income of the applicant. By combining the Land Trust Fund with the Farmers Home Administration mortgage assistance program, it should be possible to produce.a house in the low $30,000 category. With a modest downpayment, we are.looking to a monthly carrying -charge of about $300. This project should assist moderate -income families earning between $10,000 and $15,000 per year. MR. REGAN REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE ADVERTISED AS REQUIRED, HAVE NOTIFIED EVERYONE WITHIN 300', AND HAVE POSTED A NOTICE ON THE SITE ITSELF. HE NOTED THAT THIS IS A PROJECT FOR MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES, WHICH WILL ENABLE THEM TO OWN A HOUSE AT ABOUT 60% OF WHAT IT WOULD COST THEM OTHERWISE. THE FUTURE FOR LOW INCOME FAMILIES. ANOTHER PROJECT IS PLANNED IN CHAIRMAN LYONS ASKED IF THIS SUBDIVISION WILL BE PUT TOGETHER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF OUR ZONING, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, ETC., AND MR. REGAN CONFIRMED THAT THE HOUSING AUTHORITY MUST APPROACH THIS PROJECT FROM THE SAME STANDPOINT AS A PRIVATE DEVELOPER AND ADHERE TO EVERY RULE. 19 15 46 PAr'F 91 PRINCIPALS OF ABCO SALES & CONSTRUCTION, OWNER OF ONE OF THE PARCELS UNDER CONSIDERATION AND HOW THE SELLING PRICE WAS ARRIVED AT. MR. REGAN STATED THAT CORBETT SMITH AND BRYAN CARTER ARE THE PRINCIPAL OWNERS OF ABCO SALES & CONSTRUCTION, AND THE PRICE WAS ARRIVED AT BY NEGOTIATION WITH THE OWNERS. CHAIRMAN LYONS POINTED OUT THAT THE NEGOTIATIONS AND SELLING PRICE ARE,NOT A MATTER WITHIN THE PURVIEW OF THIS COMMISSION; THE COMMISSIONS ONLY PREROGATIVE IS TO SAY WHETHER WE FEEL THE PROPOSED SITE IS DESIRABLE FOR SUCH A DEVELOPMENT. JOSEPH EGAN, CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, STATED THAT THEY DID NOT WISH TO GIVE THE IMPRESSION THAT THE SALES PRICE IS CAST IN STONE AT THIS POINT. COMMISSIONER BIRD ASSUMED THE SELLING PRICE OF THE LOTS WOULD BE COMPUTED TO BE A WASH-OUT SITUATION. MR. REGAN EXPLAINED THAT STATE REQUIREMENTS ARE QUITE STRINGENT. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY MUST HAVE AN APPRAISAL OF THE LAND BEING PURCHASED AND THEN A DISPOSITION APPRAISAL; THEY CANNOT MAKE A PROFIT. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE SITE IN THE HEART OF GIFFORD WILL DISCOURAGE USE BY OTHER THAN MEMBERS OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY. HE AGREED THERE IS A DIRE NEED FOR HOUSING IN GIFFORD, BUT POINTED OUT THERE ARE OTHERS WHO ALSO WOULD LIKE TO AVAIL THEMSELVES OF THIS OPPORTUNITY. MR. REGAN NOTED THAT WHILE IT IS THE MISSION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY -TO PROVIDE HOUSING FOR PEOPLE WHO NEED IT, REGARDLESS OF x COLOR, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY IS REQUIRED TO CARRY OUT SUCH A DEVELOP- MENT AT A SITE THAT HAS WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES AVAILABLE. MR. REGAN CONTINUED THAT THE PROPOSED SITE IS IN A FINE AREA OF GIFFORD, NOT A SLUM AREA, AND HE ENVISIONED THEIR PROJECT TO BE SO ATTRACTIVE THAT IT WILL NOT EXCLUDE WHITE FAMILIES FROM BUYING. 16 w . COMMISSIONER FLETCHER FELT THAT THE PROPOSED SITE IS LOCATED IN AN ALREADY EXCESSIVELY DENSE AREA OF POPULATION, AND ASKED IF HE UNDERSTOOD CORRECTLY THAT THE PROJECT WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED WITH SEPTIC TANK AND WELLS BUT MUST BE ON A SEWER AND WATER SYSTEM. COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONFIRMED THAT THERE MUST BE A CENTRAL SYSTEM OF SOME TYPE. CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED HE PERSONALLY COULD NOT THINK OF A BETTER AREA TO PUT THIS PROJECT, AND HE HOPED THE COMMISSION WOULD VOTE FOR THE PROPOSED LOCATION, WHICH WOULD MAKE BETTER HOUSING AVAILABLE IN THE GIFFORD AREA. JUDY PRUITT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS PROJECT MOVE FORWARD NOT ONLY BECAUSE OF THE NEED, BUT BECAUSE -IN THIS TIME OF SHAKY FUNDING FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, MORE EMPHASIS WILL BE PLACED ON WHAT WILL BE DONE IN LOCAL AREAS IN PROVIDING HOUSING. CHAIRMAN LYONS ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. WALLACE CARTER OF 4521 30TH COURT WISHED TO KNOW THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED SITE. MR. REGAN DISPLAYED AN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH AND POINTED OUT THE LOCATION OF THE SITE IN RELATION TO THE GIFFORD PARK. HE NOTED THAT PINEVIEW SUBDIVISION IS TO THE EAST OF THE SITEI- GENEVIEVE BRADLEY SPOKE IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT AND THE SITE.- SHE STATED THAT IT IS NOT IN THE HEART OF GIFFORD, AND IF YOU STAND ON THE ADJACENT CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION, YOU WILL SEE ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE - BLACK, WHITE, MEXICAN, AND WHATEVER. ANN FOSTER, LIFETIME RESIDENT OF GIFFORD, STATED THAT WHAT- EVER IS DONE IN GIFFORD, WILL BE A STEP FORWARD. SHE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SHE AND ALL HER NEIGHBORS WHO LIVE IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT, ARE IN FAVOR OF SUCH A DEVELOPMENT. r. WILLIAM KOOLAGE, 26TH AVENUE, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE SERVED ON THE ORIGINAL STUDY COMMITTEE WHICH STARTED THE COUNTY COMMISSION ON THE PATH TO THIS PROJECT. MR, KOOLAGE COMMENTED THAT DURING THE FORMATION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, PUBLIC HEARINGS, ETC., 1 VERY LITTLE INTEREST WAS SHOWN BY MEMBERS OF THE WHITE COMMUNITY. HE FELT IT WOULD BE A GRAVE MISTAKE FOR THE COMMISSION NOT TO MOVE FORWARD AND GIVE THEIR FULL APPROVAL AT THIS TIME. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER BIRD, TO APPROVE THE SITE LOCATION REQUESTED BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT SITE WITH THE FOLLOWING UNDERSTANDING: (1) THAT THE PROJECT AS PROPOSED IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT ZONING; (2) THAT IT IS A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT; (3) THAT IT WILL TIE INTO THE COUNTY'S NORTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM; _(4) THAT IT WILL TIE INTO THE COUNTY'S NORTH COUNTY SEWER SYSTEM; AND (5) THAT IT WILL ADHERE TO THE NORMAL SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED CHAIRMAN EGAN IF THOSE REPRESENTATIONS WERE CONSISTENT WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY'S PLAN, AND MR. EGAN STATED THAT THEY WERE. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED WITH A 3 TO I VOTE, COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN OPPOSITION AND COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK BEING ABSENT. I., PRESENTATION BY LEEDY CORPORATION RE JUNIOR BONDS FOR RENOVATION INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS PRESENTED LAOMIS LEEDY, III, OF THE LEEDY CORPORATION. MR. THOMAS COMMENTED THAT NOW THAT WE HAVE ESTABLISHED THE NEED FOR THE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX RENOVATIONS,_THE SOONER WE CAN ACT, THE SOONER WE CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE ARBITRAGE FEATURE AND INVEST THE FUNDS, HE FELT THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY MR.. LEEDY WAS QUITE CLEAR. e CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THAT'HE HAD READ THE RESUME LEEDY CORP. FURNISHED AND KNEW THEY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN A LARGE NUMBER OF ISSUES. HE WAS CURIOUS WHY THERE WAS SO LITTLE ACTIVITY IN 1979 AND NOTHING IN 1980. MR. LEEDY STATED THEY HAVE NOT UPDATED THEIR RESUME FOR 1980. HE EXPLAINED THERE WAS A LOT OF REFUNDING DONE IN THE MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET IN 1977 AND 1978, AND AFTER THAT THE ACTIVITY FELL OFF SOMEWHAT. MR. LEEDY REPORTED THAT HIS FAMILY HAS BEEN IN THE FLORIDA MUNICIPAL BOND BUSINESS SINCE 1924; HIS GRANDFATHER STARTED THE CORPORATION OF LEEDY, WHEELER & ALLEMAN, AND HIS FATHER WORKED THERE BEFORE STARTING THE LEEDY CORPORATION. CHAIRMAN LYONS WISHED TO BE SURE THAT WE ARE ASKING FOR SUFFICIENT MONEY THIS TIME. MR. THOMAS REPORTED THAT THE ORIGINAL FIGURES THEY WORKED UP SHOWED A NEED FOR $655,000, BUT THEY HAVE DONE FURTHER RESEARCH AND IN ADDITION, THE INTEREST RATES HAVE COME DOWN SOME; S0, THEY NOW COULD SUGGEST THE BOARD MIGHT CONSIDER A FIGURE OF $725,000. HE NOTED THAT WE COULD USE EITHER FIGURE BECAUSE BEFORE GOING TO VALIDA- TION, THEY COME BACK TO THE BOARD. MR. THOMAS BROUGHT UP ANOTHER FEATURE TO BE CONSIDERED, WHICH IS THAT IT WOULD BE ADVISABLE TO COMMIT THE TOTAL BALANCE OF THE RACETRACK FUNDS SO THAT IF THE STATE CHANGES THE REGULATIONS OR TRIES TO TAKE THE MONEY, THEY HAVE TO TAKE lY,Lailifolly FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON ADVISED THE BOARD THAT THIS DOES NOT AFFECT THE AD VALOREM MONIES, BECAUSE THE RACETRACK MONIES WERE NOT THERE FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER INQUIRED ABOUT THE LENGTH OF TIME FOR WHICH THESE FUNDS ARE COMMITTED, AND MR. THOMAS INFORMED HIM IT r. WOULD BE FOR 30 YEARS. HE NOTED THAT JUNIOR BONDS ARE LIKE A SECOND MORTGAGE; BUT WE STILL HAVE TO GO TO VALIDATION, PUBLIC NOTICE, ETC., THE SAME AS IF THIS WERE AN INITIAL BOND ISSUE.s COMMISSIONER WODTKE INQUIRED ABOUT THE RATING ON THE JUNIOR BONDS AS OPPOSED TO OUR FIRST ISSUE, AND MR. }-EEDY EXPLAINED THAT THE FIRST ISSUE, WHICH WAS INSURED, WAS RATED AAA, THE JUNIOR BONDS WILL BE SECOND LIEN AND WILL NOT QUALIFY FOR INSURANCE; HE FELT THEY WOULD BE RATED BBB. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED WHETHER IN THAT CASE, THE PLEDGE OF THE RACETRACK FUNDS REALLY MEANS MUCH. FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON NOTED THAT THE OTHER CHOICE WOULD BE TO GO TO REFERENDUM AND GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, AND MR. THOMAS POINTED OUT THAT WE,WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN THE AAA RATING ON THE FIRST ISSUE IF WE HAD NOT PAID FOR THE INSURANCE (MBIA). DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO THE TRIPLE A AND TRIPLE B MARKET. °MR. LEEDY STATED THAT 1/4% BETWEEN BOND RATINGS IS A RULE OF THUMB, AND HE WOULD SAY 3/4% AS A MAXIMUM. HE FURTHER NOTED WE WOULD NOT HAVE TO BUY AN MBIA POLICY. CHAIRMAN LYONS NOTED THAT ACTUALLY WE ARE INSURING THAT THE RACETRACK FUNDS DON T GET AWAY FROM US, HE INQUIRED WHAT INTEREST THE BONDS WOULD CARRY, AND MR. LEEDY ESTIMATED 11 TO 11-1/2% (THIS IS WHAT IS PAID TO THE BOND HOLDER TAX FREE.) INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR EMPHASIZED THAT BANKS ARE ALLOWED TO INVEST IN A "B" RATED BOND ISSUE, AND FURTHER NOTED THAT IT ORIGINALLY WAS PLANNED TO SAVE SOME OF THE RACETRACK FUNDS JUST IN CASE OF AN OVERRUN, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED WORKING WITH LEEDY CORPORATION IN ESTABLISHING A JUNIOR BOND SERIES NOT TO EXCEED $725,000 AND AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE PROPOSAL MADE BY THE LEEDY CORPORATION DATED APRIL 1, 1981. L J w . 20 THE LEEDY CORPORATION P05T OFFICE BOX 711 749 NORTH GARLAND AVENUE ORLANDO, FLOFu OA 32801 MUNICIPAL FINANCIERS Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners Indian River County Vero Beach. Florida 32961 c° Gentlemen: April 1, 1981 TELEPHONE 305/423-3464 We understand that Indian River County is giving consideration to raising additional funds to complete the courthouse project, and that this may be best accomplished by the issuance of additional municipal bond financing. To this end, The Leedy Corporation proposes -that it be retained as Investment Banker by the County under conditions set forth hereinafter. In the capacity of Investment Bankers for the County, The Leedy Corporation will (1) make a complete review of your financial status, to include examination into previous bond issues, funds available to pledge to new issues, and other areas we consider pertinent, (2) discuss with you our recommendations, which will indicate funds to be pledged and sources of income to the County, (3) upon acceptance by you of a recommended method of finance, negotiate with you in good faith for the purchase of your bonds at a market interest rate and price, (4) assist you in other- wise selling your bonds should our negotiations not be successful, and (5) supervise the delivery of the bonds to the purchaser. Within the above framework we would work closely with Messrs. Freeman, Richardson, Watson, Kelly $ Livermore, Jacksonville, Florida, in matters relating to preparation of the required resolutions, and offer testimony in the validation proceedings if such be requested by the County Attorney. In the event we do not purchase bonds directly from the County we would perform all services customarily provided to public bodies issuing bonds through public sale and we are to receive a fee in accordance with the attached schedule of fees recommended by the Florida Security Dealers Association. It is understood that the County shall pay all expenses of issuance in this case. We understand and agree that the employment of our firm is specifically and solely for the outlined services and the conditions hereof. This agreement shall constitute a continuing contract, subject, however, to termination at any time with- out obligation by either party, upon thirty days' written notice, one party to the other, of intent to terminate. If for any reason, bonds are not sold, the County shall have no financial or moral obligation to us of any nature. Acceptance or rejection of bid prices for said securities shall be at the sole discretion of the County. Such services as we shall perform in every instance shall be subject .to the prior approval of the Board of County Commissioners and shall in no way constitute the managing or controlling of the official functions of the County Commission. Respectfully submitted, THE LEEDY CORPORATION By Loomis C. Leedy, III The above agreement accepted this �_ day of 1981. Attest: F1fit •(/ . IJ Approved as to form and correctness: INDIAN RI'ER COUNTY, FLORIDA f B airman Countersigned: C linty Attornev Co ty Administrator -- _ APS 1191 21 Lry. �. BOOK -46- PAGAN 777 FAPR 119 twcommended Schedule of Standard Nor Minimum Fees for Financial Consulting Contracts The following schedule of standard minimum fees is recommended by the Chartered Municipal Financial Consultants of the Florida Security Dealers Association and is considered to be appropriate for all bond issues except general obligation bonds, for which the recommended fee is 80% of the standard schedule and pari passu revenue bonds for which the recommended fee is 70% of the standard schedule. It is assumed that the issuer will pay all direct expenses in connection with the financing. Amount Of Bonds Amount Of Fee Fee Per $1,000 For Next $100,000 Par Value Amount Of Bonds Amount Of Fee Fee Per $1,000 For Next $100,000 Per Value $ 500,000 $ 7,500.00 $12.500 $2,800,000 $21,837.50 $4.000 600,000 8,750.00 11.250 2,900,000 22,237.50 3.875 700,000 9,875.00:' 10.000 3,000,000 22,625.00 3.750 800,000 10,875.00 8.750 3,100,000 23,000.00 3.625 900,000 11,750.00 7.500 3,200,000 23,362.50 3.500 1,000,000 , 12,500.00 6.250 3,300,000 23,712.50 3.375 1,100,000 13,125.00 6.125 3,400,000 24,050.00 3.250 1,200,000 13,737.50 6.000 3,500,000 24,375.00 3.125 1,300,000 14,337.50 5.875 3,600,000 24,687.50 3.000 1,400,000 14,925.00 5.750 3.700,000 24,987.50 2.875 1,500,000 15,500.00 5.625 3,800,000 25,275.00 2.750 1,600,000 16,062.50 5.500 3,900,000 25,550.00 2.625 1,700,000 16,612.50 5.375 4,000,000 1 25,812.50 2.500 1,800,000 -17,150.00 5.250 4,100,000 26,062.50 2,375 1,900,000 17,675.00 5.125 4,200,000 26,300.00. 2.250 2,000,000 18,187.50 5.000 4,300,000 26,525.00 2.125 2,100,000. 18,687.50 4.875 4,400,000 26,737.50 2.000 2,200,000 19,175.00 4.750 4,500,000 26,937.50 1.875 2,300,000 19,650.00 4.625 4,600,000 27,125.00 1.750 2,400,000 20,112.50 4.500 4,700,000 27,300.00 1.625 2,500,000 20,562.50 4.375 4,800,000 27,462.50 1.500 2,600,000 21,000.00 4.250 4,900,000 27,612.50 1.375 2,700,000 21,425.00 4.125 5,000,000 27,750.00 All over $5,000,000 subject to negotiation. HERBICIDE SPRAY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING MEMO: TO: Honorable Members of the ®ATE: March 23, 1981 FILE: Board of County Commissioners SUBJECT: 2.4-D Spray Program I 9 FROM: Neil A. Nelson, REFERENCES: County Administrat r As requested by the Board of County Commissioners, the Administration has reviewed the County's herbicide spray program. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Indian River County presently operates a herbicide program whicht utilizes the chemicals 2,4-D and Dalapon with a spreader/sticker. These materials are used to spray drainage ditches, around road signs and utility poles, and in canals (Dalapon only) to curtail the growth of water hyacinths and.cat tails. We are advised these materials are currently approved for these uses by the Florida Departments of Agriculture and Natural Resources. As required by Florida law, all applications of herbicide are made by the County's two licensed applicators. I ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES Based upon review of the information and material available to this office, the Administration believes the present program does not represent a potential hazard to the environment. There are two chemicals which could be utilized rather than 2,4-D. Dupont's- "Velpar L" and Monsanto's "Found -up" would cost $35.00 and $32.00 per equivalent gallon, respectively; whereas 2,4-D costs $8.30 per gallon. A shift to either of the alternatives would result in an increase of estimated annual cost from approximately $5,200 to a minimum of $20,000. Each of the chemicals has different characteristics, effectiveness and residual effects. RECOMMENDATION AND- FUNDING Based upon our review and analysis, the Administration submits the following recommendations for the Board's consideration. 1. Continue present herbicide spray program. 2. Retain qualified individual or firm to act in an.. -.advisory capacity with specific responsibility to: a) conduct initial survey and inspections of spray program. b) provide advice regarding both materials/chemicals and appropriate mixing and application rates. �c) assist in training of spray crew regarding material use and application. -• d) be available, on a retainer basis, to provide periodic advice and guidance regarding the spray program, as needed. Estimated cost for the balance of FY 1980-81 is less than $1,000.00, with anticipated costs for FY 1981-82 being in the range of $1,200.00 to $1,800.00. Although not specifically provided in the Road and Bridge Division Budget, funds p are available and can be utilized for this purpose. 9981 It is requested the Board approve the above recommendatio Kand'' e tr Tin to proceed accordingly. -ZV U� 9 AND THAT WE WOULD BE KEPT ABREAST OF THE LATEST CHANGES. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF SUCH AN ADVISOR WOULD BE ABLE TO WORK WITH THE PEOPLE WHO ARE APPLYING THE HERBICIDE IN THE FIELD TO BE SURE THEY ARE USING IT PROPERLY ACCORDING TO SAFETY STANDARDS. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THE ADVISOR WOULD LOOK AT HOW WE ARE APPROACHING THE PROGRAM, WHAT CHEMICALS WE ARE USING, WHAT DITCHES WE ARE SPRAYING, AND HE WOULD PERIODICALLY ACTUALLY VISUALIZE THE OPERATION. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SIT DOWN WITH MR. JACKSON AND SET UP A SPECIFIC PROGRAM OUTLINING WHAT HIS DUTIES WOULD CONSIST OF. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER BIRD, TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ADMINISTRATOR WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT A CONTRACT WILL BE DRAWN UP BETWEEN MR. .JACKSON AND THE COUNTY SPELLING OUT SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS, COMMIS- SIONER,FLETCHER TO WORK WITH THE ADMINISTRATOR IN APPROVING THE CONTRACT, AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN. COMMISSIONER BIRD FELT THIS IS A GOOD IDEA, AND THE CHAIRMAN AGREED, BUT WISHED THE AFFECT OF PUTTING HERBICIDES ON THE BANKS OF THE CANALS TO BE STUDIED TO SEE IF THIS CAUSES THE SIDES TO SLUMP AND POSSIBLY CAUSE MORE PROBLEMS THAN BENEFITS. i. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON. RECOMMENDED APPROVING THE REQUEST FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FOR VERO BEACH CENTRAL PLAZA AS PER THE FOLLOWING MEMO: w . 24 TO: The Honorable Memvers of the DATE: March 24, 1981 FILE: Board of County Commissioners SUBJECT: Request for Water & Sewer Service ` for Vero Beach Central Plaza (formerly Drive -In Theater), West of U.S. #1, South of K -Mart FROM: Neil A. Nelson, REFERENCES: County Administrator DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Carter Associates, Inc. (Dean Luethje), Engineer of record for the above subject project, has requested in a letter dated March 23, 1981, to'have the subject item placed on the County Commission.agenda for April 1, 1981, at the suggestion of County Attorney Collins. Previously the Commission limited sewer service to the east of U.S. #1 along the 6th Avenue force main because of expected high demand for the sewer service. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The County negotiated for an increased water allocation from the City of Vero Beach to relieve the previous moratorium on the South County Water System. A priority procedure for taking the rush of applications for service was approved. Following the procedure of advertising resulted in completed agreements for a total of 42,000 gallons per day against the estimated 280,000 gallons per day of increased allocation negotiated from City of Vero Beach. We have tentative agreements (but no committments to developer) for an added use of about 230,000 gallons per day. We don't expect all of these agreements to be excuted, but if they do, we will still hold a reserve of about 10,000 gallons per day; sufficient for about 82 individual corrections. RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING I recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the availability of water and sewer service to the subject project, subject to County and State regulations for providing the service. DEAN LEUTHJE OF CARTER & ASSOCIATES INFORMED THE BOARD THAT VERO BEACH CENTRAL PLAZA, WHICH IS LOCATED AT THE OLD DRIVE-IN THEATRE SITE, WILL HAVE A DAILY SEWER AND WATER USAGE OF APPROXIMATELY 25,000 GALLONS. CHAIRMAN LYONS ASKED IF THERE IS ANY PROBLEM ABOUT THIS WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED NOT AS LONG AS WE STAY WITHIN OUR LIMITS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED THE FIGURES IN THE MEMO, NOTING THAT WE HAVE COMPLETED AGREEMENTS FOR 42,000 GPD AND TENTATIVE AnR JIM 25 46 f%li€ 2 APR 11981 pox 4 P8 AGREEMENTS FOR 230,000 GPD, LEAVING AN ESTIMATED RESERVE OF ONLY ABOUT 10,000 GPD, AND HE WISHED TO KNOW WHERE THE 25,000 GPD WILL COME FROM. AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS DECIDED TO HOLD THIS MATTER OVER UNTIL UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER COULD BE PRESENT. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECESSED AT 11:12 O'CLOCK A.M. IN ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT BOARD OF FIRE -COMMIS- SIONERS OF'THE SOUTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT MIGHT CONVENE. MINUTES OF THAT MEETING WILL BE PREPARED SEPARATELY. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RECONVENED AT 11:42 01CLOCK A.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT. DISCUSSION RE WATER & SEWER SERVICE FOR VERO BEACH CENTRAL PLAZA (CONTD.) IN RESPONSE TO COMMISSIONER WODTKE'S QUESTION AS TO WHERE THE 25,000 GPD REQUESTED FOR VERO BEACH CENTRAL PLAZA WILL COME FROM, ADMINISTRATOR NELSON EXPLAINED THAT THIS REQUEST WAS INCLUDED IN THE 230,000 GPD FIGURE FOR WHICH THERE ARE TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS; S0, WE STILL WOULD HAVE A 10,000 GALLON RESERVE IF WE SATISFIED EVERYONE. ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THIS APPLIES ONLY TO WATER; RESOLUTION 79-48 ALLOCATES A 600,000 GPD ALLOCATION OF SEWAGE AND RESTRICTS IT TO THE AREA IN THE VICINITY OF 6TH AVENUE EAST OF U.S. 1. IN ORDER TO GRANT THE SEWER PORTION OF THE REQUEST, IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO AMEND RESOLUTION 79-48 TO INCLUDE THE AREA WEST OF U.S. 1. COMMISSIONER WODTKE BELIEVED WE RESTRICTED THE AREA EAST OF U.S. 1 FOR SPECIFIC REASONS. HE STATED HE KNEW OF TWO OR THREE WEST OF U. -S. 1 WHO WOULD HAVE REQUESTED THIS SERVICE, BUT WERE DENIED, AND HE WAS OPPOSED TO EXTENDING THE AREA WEST FOR ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION WHETHER RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL. HE COULD NOT SEE MAKING ALL THE CURB CUTS, ETC., TO SATISFY ONE PARTICULAR CUSTOMER. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT HE WAS NOT AWARE OF ANY PEOPLE REFUSED THIS SERVICE, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE CITED THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS ON U.S. 1. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER ASKED MR. L.UETHJE ABOUT HIS CLIENT'S ALTERNATIVE, AND MR. L.UETHJE STATED IT WOULD BE TO BUILD A SEWER PACKAGE PLANT, A WATER TREATMENT PLANT, AND A SYSTEM FOR FIRE PRO- TECTION. THE OTHER ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE TO ASK THE CITY FOR ANNEXATION. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT THAT CIRCUMSTANCES HAVE CHANGED; WE HAVE THIS WATER AVAILABLE; WE ARE PAYING FOR IT; AND IF WE CAN GET ANY CUSTOMERS, FELT WE SHOULD. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THIS SERVICE WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO EXISTING UNITS ON THE EAST TO TRY TO ELIMINATE PACKAGE PLANTS IN THAT AREA. HE FELT IF WE ARE GOING TO DO THIS ON THE WEST, WE SHOULD DO IT ON THE SAME BASIS - TO ELIMINATE EXISTING PLANTS AND THEN MAKE IT AVAILABLE TO NEW CONSTRUCTION. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT CROSSING U.S. 1 OR POS>SIBLY CONNECTING AT VERO MALL. COMMISSIONER BIRD COMMENTED THAT APPARENTLY WE ARE NOT ACTUALLY OBLIGATED FOR THE TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS BECAUSE IT WAS SET UP ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS. CHAIRMAN LYONS AGREED, NOTING THAT WE ADVERTISED AND THESE PEOPLE CAME IN AND SAID THEY FELT THEY WOULD BE INTERESTED, BUT THEY HAVE NEVER GONE THROUGH WITH IT. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT RELEASING ANY WATER IN THE EVENT WE MAY HAVE A FUTURE EMERGENCY, ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE WATER IS BEING SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, AND WE HAVE PROVISIONS WHERE IN AN EMERGENCY THERE IS ADDITIONAL WATER MADE AVAILABLE, BUT WE PAY FOR IT. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT WE ARE WHOLESALE PURCHASERS OF WATER, AND WE SELL IT RETAIL. ' ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT IF THE -COMMISSION SHOULD DECIDE TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE, HE BELIEVED WE.,CAN DESIGNATE WHERE THE LINES WILL G0, WHAT SIZE THEY WILL BE, AND TAKE FUTURE PLANNING INTO ACCOUNT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONTINUED TO EXPRESS CONCERN ABOUT MAKING THIS AVAILABLE FOR COMMERCIAL USE WHEN YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL ri SPR 11981 27 46 Pka 203 . `h3-.. �. _.. .-b. ..wi:,>�.. as�3_at✓�ut...�.'..:,v:.:t�s .��.�-.<.�s z. �...,Y>._✓ ..... ...,u`e >•. ... ...�y,. a c .mac. .... ........... �. .._..e.w<.x. _._...� .. ..a ._... a. �..... _a �..? ,+. �v.�.. r ..,....- 80G Q3 APR 11981 NEEDS, AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT WHILE THE DEVELOPER WOULD TIE INTO OUR SYSTEM, THE INDIVIDUAL RESIDENTS CANNOT AFFORD THE EXPENSE. CHAIRMAN LYONS AGREED THAT THE PROBLEM IS THERE IS NO WAY TO GET THE WATER TO THESE RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS UNLESS THEY CAN FINANCE THE LINES. FURTHER DISCUSSION ENSUED WITH REGARD TO CROSSING U.S. I OR TYING IN AT THE VERO MALL, AND MR. LUETHJE STATED THAT HE HAD ORIGINALLY ENVISIONED GOING UNDER U.S. I, BUT IF THE COMMISSION PREFERRED THAT THEY COME DOWN TO 12TH ST. TO TIE IN, POSSIBLY THEY COULD -CROSS UNDER RUSSELL CONCRETES ENTRANCE ROAD AND SIZE THE MAIN SO THAT OTHER DEVELOPMENTS, SUCH AS TOYOTA AND FORD COULD UTILIZE IT; THEN THEY WOULD DEED THE MAIN OVER TO THE COUNTY. HE NOTED THAT THEY HAD TALKED AT ONE TIME ABOUT GOING BY THE CLOCK RESTAURANT, WHICH HAS ITS OWN SEWER PLANT BUT RECENTLY HAD TO MAKE A BIG EXPENDITURE TO UPGRADE IT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE MR. LUETHJE COME BACK WITH INFORMATION AS TO WHERE THE LINE WOULD G0, WHERE IT WOULD TIE IN TO THE 6TH AVENUE MAIN, WHAT ADDITIONAL CUSTOMERS COULD TIE IN, WHAT PACKAGE PLANTS COULD BE ELIMINATED, ETC. HE STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THIS LINE AVAILABLE TO EVERYONE IN THE; .AREA. UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER NOTED THAT WE DID GO THROUGH THE ADVERTISING PERIOD, AND THIS 230,000 GPD OF TENTATIVE AGREEMENTS IS THE RESULT; WE DO NOT HAVE AN OVERPOWERING DEMAND FOR USAGE EITHER FROM DEVELOPERS OR RESIDENTIAL. MR. LUETHJE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS CLIENT IS OUT FOR BIDS RIGHT NOW, AND THEY SHOW A SEWER AND WATER PLANT ON THEIR PLANS. THEY, THEREFORE, NEED TO KNOW IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE ALLOTTED THE 25,000 GPD FOR THEIR PROJECT OR NOT SO THEY CAN PROCEED ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, CHAIRMAN LYONS PERSONALLY BELIEVED IT IS UP TO THE COMMIS- SION TO PROVIDE WATER WHEN IT IS AVAILABLE, AND HE COULD NOT SEE WHY WE SHOULD ASK THIS APPLICANT TO GO INTO HIS OWN PACKAGE PLANT WHEN WE HAVE SEWER AND WATER AVAILABLE. HE DID FEEL THAT THE WAY THE LINE IS RUN SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO FURTHER CONSIDERATION. MR. LUETHJE STATED THAT IF THEY COULD BE SURE THEY WERE GOING TO GET THE ALLOCATION, THEY DEFINITELY WOULD BE WORKING WITH THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT ON THE PLANS FOR THE LINE AND THE ROUTING. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON FELT THIS IS A VIABLE SOLUTION BECAUSE IT WILL OPEN UP OTHER POSSIBILITIES FOR THE USE OF SEWER AND WATER IN THE AREA AND GET US MORE CUSTOMERS. COMMISSIONER BIRD AGREED THAT WE SHOULD BE DISCOURAGING PACKAGE PLANTS AS MUCH AS WE CAN. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER FLETCHER, TO GRANT VERO BEACH CENTRAL PLAZA AN ALLOCATION UP TO 25,000 GPD FOR WATER AND SEWER SUBJECT TO THE SUBMISSION OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE COUNTY UTILITY DEPARTMENT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THE MOTION WOULD INCLUDE THAT THE COMMISSION WOULD BE RECEPTIVE TO ALLOCATION OF WATER AND SEWER WEST OF U.S. 1 BETWEEN THE MALL AND THE CITY LIMITS AND THE AREA WEST TO THE RAILROAD. COMMISSIONER BIRD STATED THAT IT WOULD VERY DEFINITELY, AND HE WOULD LIKE THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE WHAT THE DEMAND MIGHT BE AND HOW THIS WOULD AFFECT THE DETERMINATION OF THE SIZE OF THE LINE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONTINUED TO DISCUSS THE NEED TO ADDRESS THE ENTIRE ENCLAVE AREA BETWEEN THE MALL AND CITY LINES SO THAT IT WOULD TIE INTO A FUTURE PROGRAM, AND THE CHAIRMAN SUGGESTED THAT WE MAKE THAT A SEPARATE MOTION. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HIS,:APPROVAL OF THE FIRST MOTION WOULD BE BASED ON A SYSTEM NECESSARY TO PROVIDE SEWER AND WATER FOR THE ENTIRE AREA. CHAIRMAN LYONS DID NOT BELIEVE WE CAN DO ANYTHING MORE THAN ASK THIS APPLICANT TO SIZE HIS LINE IN A CERTAIN WAY AND RUN IT TO A POINT OF CONNECTION. APR 11981 RDQI( 46 PAGE J COMMISSIONER BIRD BELIEVED WE ALL UNDERSTAND WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH, AND IF MR. LUETHJE COMES BACK WITH FINAL DRAWINGS WHICH ARE EXCESSIVE, HE..HAS THE OPTION OF SAYING THEY WILL GO BACK TO A PACKAGE PLANT. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO THE SO-CALLED "TENTATIVE" -CUSTOMERS AND THE SITUATION ON THE WEST SIDE OF U.S. 1. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER FLETCHER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT SEWER AND WATER SERVICE BE MADE AVAILABLE FROM THE VERO MALL TO THE SOUTH LIMITS OF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH EAST OF THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY TO U.S. 1, AND THAT WE HAVE AN OVERALL PLAN FOR TRANSMISSION LINES TO PROVIDE THAT SERVICE. COMMISSIONER BIRD BROUGHT UP THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE MADE TENTATIVE APPLICATIONS BUT NOT SIGNED AN AGREEMENT, AND THE ATTORNEY SUGGESTED THAT THOSE PEOPLE BE CONTACTED AND APPRISED OF THE SITUATION. ula"wriamincli I :1 THE BOARD REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING MEMO: TO: The Honorable Board DATE: March 24, 1981 FILE: of County Commissioners ti FROM: Neil A. Nelson, County Administrator SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Application Oak Tree Estates Subdivision - Approx. 10 Acres Containing 16 Lots - Location: South of S.R. 60, West of King's Highway Owner: Eugene L. Schultz REFERENCES: DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The subject Preliminary Plat application has been reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on March 10, 1981. The T.R.C. recommended approval subject to the following: 1. Indian River Farms Water Management District and D.O.T. granting appropriate permits for culverts. In addition, the developer is prohibited from removing ".plug" in the Indian River Farms Water Management District canal. 2. Approval by the County Engineer of details of side lot easements and drainage ditch details. 3. The provision of a 75 -foot setback on S.R. 60 in accordance with ordinance. 4. The cul-de-sac be replaced with road/T-turn around to connect with the future extension of 18th Street. Escrow money for the paving of a half -road on the future 18th Street right-of-way. ALTERNATIVE AND ANALYSIS The applicant has complied with all items except (4) above. Although a 30' wide R.O.W. at the south end of the development has been shown for dedication, the cul- de-sac design prohibits connection in the future. This design, therefore, is not in conformance with Section 4, Paragraph 1. (C) of the Subdivision Ordinance #75-3, which states that "the arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall be such to facilitate and coordinate with the desirable future platting of adjoining unplatted property........" The applicant has agreed to provide escrow funds for paving half a road along 18th Street. to the south. RECOMMENDATION -AND FUNDING Based on the foregoing discussion, staff recommends,approval with the provision of access for future connection of Oak Lane and 18th Street: There are no funding considerations for this item. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR April 1, 1981 NAN:ms ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THAT ROUTE 60 IS TO THE NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROPERTY IS IN THE BACK. THE ONLY PROBLEM THEY SEE IN THE SUBDIVISION IS THAT AT SOME DATE THERE SHOULD BE A PUBLIC ROAD GOING BEHIND THE PROPERTY. THE ONLY INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THE SUBDIVISION IS ON ISR' 11981 ROUTE 60. THE DEVELOPER IS WILLING TO GIVE THE RIGHT—OF—WAY DESIRED BUT DOES NOT WANT TO TIE IN. THE ADMINISTRATOR FELT IT WOULD BE BETTER FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE SUBDIVISION TO BE ABLE TO EXIT SOMEWHERE OTHER THAN JUST ON ROUTE 60 WHERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO EAST AND THEN TURN AROUND TO GO WEST. HE NOTED THAT 18TH STREET SOME DAY WILL GO THROUGH TO KINGS HIGHWAY, AND IT IS ALREADY STARTED FROM VERONA ESTATES, WHICH IS TO THE WEST OF THIS PROPERTY. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON WISHED TO CONTINUE GETTING THIS RIGHT—OF—WAY AND EVENTUALLY END UP WITH A ROAD TO KINGS HIGHWAY. DTSCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO JUST INSISTING ON HAVING THE RIGHT OF WAY WHETHER WE CUT THROUGH OR NOT, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF OAK TREE ESTATES SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ADMINISTRATION REQUIRING THE FUTURE CONNECTION OF OAK LANE AND 18TH ST. TENTATIVE APPROVAL PINECREST SUBDIVISION, UNIT 2 ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING MEMO: TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners 'V . FROM: Neil A. Nelson County Administrator 1. Description and Conditions ®ATE: March 24, 1981 FILE: SUBJECT: Prel i.mi.nary Plat Approval Pinecrest Subdi,vi,si.on, Unit 2 Approximately 19 Acres containing 52 lots � Located North of Citrus Road (4th St.) East of 11th Ave. Owner - Visa Building Corp. REFERENCES: The subject Preliminary Plat application has been reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on March 17, 1981. At that meeting, it was recommended that money be placed in escrow with the County for the cost of fire hydrants. Also, it was noted that the Health Department will not issue any septic tank permits until water lines are approved by the D.E.R. 2. Alternatives and Analysis The Developer has agreed to comply with the recommendations of the Technical Review Committee prier to final plat approval and the County Staff has no objections to the approval of this Preliminary Plat. 3. - Recon.nendati ons and Fund i nc Approval of the Preliminary Flat for Pinecrest Subdivision, Unit 2, is recommended. This item has no funding considerations to be addressed by the Board. THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS AGREED TO COMPLY WITH ALL REGULATIONS RE FIRE HYDRANTS, ETC., AND HE WOULD RECOMMEND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. DISCUSSION ENSUED IN REGARD TO PEOPLE CROSSING THROUGH COLONIAL TERRACE SUBDIVISION TO GET TO THIS WATER PLANT AND ALSO THE MONEY PUT IN ESCROW FOR SEEDING AND LANDSCAPING AROUND THE'PLANT. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IN THIS SUBDIVISION, THE DEVELOPER IS CONVEYING TRANSMISSION LINES TO THE COUNTY AND HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THEM CONVEYED PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO PINECREST SUBDIVISION, UNIT 2, WITH THE CONDITION THAT PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, THE NECESSARY WATER LINES, FIRE HYDRANTS, ETC., WILL BE CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY. TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT FILING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REFERRED TO HIS FOLLOWING MEMO: 1i APR1711981 .TO: Board of County cmc issioners DATE: 3-25-81 y FILE: w SUBJECT: Ztaffic• Department filing �. System FROM: Neil A. Nelson County Administrator f 1. 2. 3. Description and Conditions REFERENCES: The Traffic Departrrent for the Clerk works with 12,000 case files each day. In addition, they are required to maintain in current storage case files for the past five years. In moving into their new space in the renovated courthouse, they plan to store these files in 36 4 -drawer filing cabinets. This method of storage would be ctuerscme and an inefficient use of office space. Alternatives and Analysis The Clerk of the Court has had a movable filing system approved by the Board for three other areas to conserve and better manage office space. The use of this type filing system for the Traffic Department will reduce the space requira7ent for storage from 240 sq. ft. to 63 sq. ft. The cost to provide this system will be $5,197.56 and could be added on with the existing contract we have with Lundia. Recommendations That the Board approve the purchase and installation of the additional Lundia full space system consisting of one single stationary 9" X 72" X 34!' with 10 openings. Three double movables 18" X 72" X 84". One double stationary 18" X 72" X 84". The Board approve funding from Account 102-220-519-66.41 in the amount of $5,197.56. ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REPORTED THAT THE 12,000 FIGURE SHOULD BE CORRECTED TO 1,200. HE EMPHASIZED THE POINT THAT SPACE IS TOO EXPENSIVE TO TAKE UP SIMPLY FOR STORAGE AND URGED THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER EXPANDING THE PRESENT CONTRACT WITH LUNDIA, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE BASEMENT SPACE AND THE UTILIZATION OF THE FILE CABINETS WHICH WOULD BE EMPTIED. THE ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED THAT THE BASEMENT IS NOT A SUITABLE STORAGE AREA FOR FILES BECAUSE OF THE HUMIDITY AND NEED FOR A SUMP PUMP TO KEEP IT DRY, AND FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE EXTRA FILE CABINETS WILL BE KEPT IN THE WAREHOUSE AND UTILIZED IN SMALL OFFICE AREAS AS NEEDED. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PURCHASE OF THE LUNDIA FULLSPACE SYSTEM AS OUTLINED IN THE ADMINISTRATOR'S MEMO OF MARCH 25, 1981, IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,197.56 FUNDING FR-OM.A000UNT #102-220-519-66.41, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE AMOUNT SPENT SO FAR FOR FURNISHINGS AND EQUIPMENT FROM THIS ACCOUNT, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT BEFORE ANY MORE OF THESE DOLLARS ARE SPENT, HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A COMPLETE BREAKDOWN ON WHAT HAS BEEN SPENT SO FAR. THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT HE WILL GET A COMPLETE REPORT, RESOLUTION 81-20 RESOLUTION 81-20 APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE GIFFORD WATER AND SEWER ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF MARCH 25, 1981. s FADE BOOR 35 21�.. RESOLUTION NO. 81-20 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following members. are hereby appointed to the GIFFORD WATER AND SEWER ADVISORY COMMITTEE from the respective areas: GIFFORD PROGRESSIVE CIVIC LEAGUE: FRED PLAIR ARTHUR J. HARRIS GIFFORD JAYCEES: Representative Alternate MABON SNELL Representative LORENZO WASHINGTON Alternate AFRO-AMERICAN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES: ELDER WILLIE KITT Representative DONALD BROWN Alternate GIFFORD N.A.A.C.P.: VICTOR HART Representative VENDA BURGESS Alternate MATRONS WOMANS CLUB: LILLIE MAE MINNIS Representative DORETHEA McGRIFF Alternate MOONGLOW FEDERATED CLUB: MRS. TOMMY C. GILBERT Representative Alternate GIFFORD JAYCEE-ETTES: Representative Alternate CHAIRMAN: DON C. SCURLOCK, JR. Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 25th day of March , 1981. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN COUNTY, FLORIDA By L2 Attest: trick B. Lyons,/,"Chajirmad �s T.Luda Wr�igt, glerk THE FOLLOWING CHANGE ORDERS SIGNED BY ADMINISTRATOR NELSON PER COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION OF AUGUST 11, 1979, ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES: COURTHOUSE - N0, 17 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - No, 21 No. 22 No, 23 No, 25 CHANGE OWNER ARCHITECT ❑ ❑ ORDER CONTRACTOR [] FIELD AIA DOCUMENT G701 OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Indian River County (name, address) County Courthouse TO (Contractor) F Reinhold Construction Inc P.O,Box 666 Cocoa, FL 32922 CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 17 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:9364 CONTRACT FOR: Additions & Renovations L CONTRACT DATE: 4-2-80 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: CP -36 At the owners request. Provide Sign to be posted outside of door to Machine Room #1 102 to read "DANGER -ELECTRICAL FQUIPMFNT-APTHORIZED PERSONS ONLY" Add one(l) telephone outlet on East wall Room 117and one(1)on East wall Room 118. Sheet E-3 existing to remain. Run conduit in crawl space & then to basement panel board. Surface mounted outlets. The proposed changes in the work may result in additions] time required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time will be added to thae contract that is diredtly related to this change order. The contractor will be paid for the additional required days at the rate of $300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead costs. $1,036.11 The original Contract Sum was . . . . .$ 689,000.00 Net change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 142, 145.27 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 831,145.27 The Contract Sum will be (increased) by this Change Order . . . $ 1,036.11 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . $ 832,181-38 The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( -' ) Days. The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is rngNFI t Mt=TrALI= F runny ARCHITECT _1.3.2.0 S. Dixie HI iway Address RMHOI D cnNSTRUCT p INf _ CONTRACT Address JLND IAN R IVFR COUNTY Qy�(r()rR 14th Ave Address DATE AIA DOCUMENT 0701 • CHANGE ORDER APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIAS • m 1970 THE ONE PACE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 173S NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 MK '46 pAcE213 CuwNER ❑ CHANGE ARCHITECT B _ ORDER CONTRACTOR FIELD ❑ AIA DOCUMENT G701 OTHER PROJECT. Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 21 (name. address) County Administratlon Bldg, 80GK 46 PA To (Contractor) (— - � ARCHITECT'S PROJECT N0:9363 Reinh9Id Construction Inc. CONTRACT FOR: Additions & Renovations P.O.Box 666 Cocoa, FL 32922 L J CONTRACT DATE: April 2, 1980 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: item #/1 CP -50 Provide new 1211X1211 acoustical the ceiling from exist- 5724,73 ing soffit North to corridor N160 in corridor s156. item -##2 CP -51 Modify sound pipes and dies framing-Com-nission Room $1-49.00 at the owners request. Item #/3 Provide ceiling soffits where necessary- see attached $1,375.52 Items 1 and 3 are due to Field Conditions. 2,249.25 Total-----$ The proposed changes in the work may result in Additional time required beyond the contract completion Baste. Additional time will be added to the contract that is directly related to this change order. The contractor will be paid for the additional required days at the rate of $300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead costs. The number of days requested are reflected to the attached documents. s . The original Contract Sum was 2,748,000.00223,149.75 Net change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . S 2,971,149.75 2,249.25 The Contract Sum will be (increasedlXiH(rgXrXMMMAX ISy this Change Order . • . $ 2,973,399-00 . The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . . .- The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( ) Days. The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is CONNELL METCALF 6 EDDY ARCHITECT Ad -dress 4 1 BY D DATE I Z REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC_ CONTRACTOR n Sex 666 Address Cocoa, FL 32922 z DATE �- / L% ' Jf I/ INDIAN REVER COUNTY 144th Ave - Address Vero Beach. FL 32960 DATE =—I_= AIA DOCUMENT 6741 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA® • O 1970 • THE ONE PACE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Or ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 CHANGE OWNER ARCHITECT ❑ ❑ ORDER CONTRACTOR FIELD ❑ ❑ AIA DOCUMENT G701 OTHER The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . . PROJECT: (name, address) TO (Contractor) I Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 22 County Administration BLdg. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:9363 Reinhold Construction Inc. CONTRACT FOR: Addit ions & Renovations P.O•Box 666 -Cocoa, FL 32922 L _j CONTRACT DATE: Apr i 1 2, 1980 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: CP -48 Due to field conditions ( moisture damage). Provide new laminate finish (double furred) at north wall of Roam W103 and corredDr W111. $984.65 The proposed changes in the work may result In Additional time required beyond the contract completion daste. Additional time will be added to the contract that is directly related to this change order. The contractor will be paid for the additional required days at the rate of $300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead costs. The number of days requested are reflected in the attached documents. The original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2 , 748, 000, 00 Net change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 225,399-00 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,973,399-00 The Contract Sum will be (increased) (tXt'c,1(d(a)(i+{%X(141(a4 XXM by this Change Order . . . $ 984,65 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,974,383.65 The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( -- ) Days. The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is —CONNELL METrAtF E. Enny REINHOL>LGONSTRUCTION INC_ ARCHITECT INDIAN RIVER COURTY__ CONTRACT( .fi n Hid way P 0�_p Address ?145R 14th Ave. Address Address Co;.oa, FL 32922 Vero Beach, FL 32960 DATE DATE ,(� q DATE "l — .— pIr AIA DOCUMENT 0701 • CHANGE ORDER APRIL 1970 EDITION AIAS m 1970 THE AMERICAN I\STITL;TE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE.. NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 ONE PAGE :r 1 i 39 �aG 46 FA 215' APR 11991 CHANGE OWNER EJ ARCHIT[CT ❑ • i9 Y.t Bao ORDER CONTRACTOR ❑ FIELD fl AiA DOCUMENT G701 OTHER PROJECT: Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 23 (twenty three) (name,address) County Adnin,J:stration Bldg, TO (Contractor) Reinhold Construction Inc P.�0. Box 666 Cocoa, FL 32922 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9363 CONTRACT FOR: Additions & Renovations L I CONTRACT DATE: 4-2-80 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: - CP -55 Provide a new lid for the existing water meter per the attached $1,484,89 change proposal at the owners request/ CP=59 Repair curb damage per the attached change proposal at the 222,17 owners request. -- Total ------ $1,707.06 The proposed changes in the work may result in Additional time required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time will be added to the contract that is directly related to this charge order. The contractor will be paid for the additional required days at the rate of $300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead costs. The number of days requested are reflected in the attached documents. r� The original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2 , 748 , 000.00 Net change by previous Change Orders . less C0,17. (rejected) . . . . . . $ 221 ,101.73 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,969,101-73 The Contract Sum will be (increased) (dWi✓e *W*(*EigK0%)6y this Change Order. . . $ 1, 707.06 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,970,803-79 The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( -- ) Days. The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is rnNNFI t ARCHITECT Address Cnr;ql rahl -.Ek 33134 DATE BEINHUD CONSTRUCTION INC. SOT%OxD�55 Address Coeoa. FL/ 32922-. /BY DATE AIA DOCUMENT 6701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA8 • m 1970 • THE AMERICAN IM1STITUIE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE.. NW, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (MV 14th Ave. Address Vero Beach, FL 32960 DATE ONE PAGE a - --OWER CHANGE ARCHIUCT ❑ p R oll®Ep CONTRACTOR �] FIELD ❑ AiA DOCUMENT G701 OTHER PROJECT: Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 25 (twenty five) (name, address) Administration Building TO (Contractor) ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9363 Reinhold Construction Inc. CONTRACT FOR:Additions >; Renovations P,O.Box 666 Cocoa, FL 32922 L I CONTRACT DATE: 4-2-80 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: CP -54 Regrade access road to provide drainage per the attached change proposal due to field conditions. $1,519.04 The proposed changes in the w.)rk may result in additional time required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time will be added to the contract that is directly related to this change order. The contractor will be paid for the additional required days at the rate of $300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead costs. The original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • •$ 2 , 748, 008:00 Net change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 222,808.79 The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2 , 970, 808.79 , The Contract Sum will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by this Change Order . . . $ 1,519A The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . . $ 2,972,327.83 The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( ) Days. The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is , ARCHITECT 1 nlxip . •.,- � 1r BF H()t D coNSTRIIrna INC,._ CONTRACTOR p,0 Box 666 Address Cocoa FL 32922 BY DATE AIA DOCUMENT 0701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIAS • m 1970 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE.. NW. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 'FT 0:• —LNDIAN SIVFR CoiINTY OWNER 2145 14th Ave. Address ro Beach. FL 32960 BY !•- DATE 1 ONE PAGE APR 11981 THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: - TREASURY FUND NOS. 69941 - 70069 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED FROM THE RESPECTIVE BONDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES. 'THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 12:46 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTEST: CLERK