HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-252A (07)Indian River County
2030 Comprehensive Plan
A . . A
Indian River County Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Listof Tables..................................................................................................................................
iv
Introduction....................................................................................................................................
1
ExistingConditions.........................................................................................................................
2
FinancialResources................................................................................................................ 2
Expenditures.........................................................................................................................
19
Existing Outstanding Debt....................................................................................................
22
Local Policies and Practices.................................................................................................
24
Analysis.........................................................................................................................................
27
Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements ...........................................
27
NeedsAssessment.................................................................................................................
34
FiscalAssessment.................................................................................................................
36
Fiscal Assessment Summary.................................................................................................
42
Concurrency Management Plan...................................................................................................
42
ProjectApplicability.............................................................................................................
43
ServiceStandards..................................................................................................................
43
Demand.................................................................................................................................
45
Availabilityof Capacity........................................................................................................
46
Regulation.............................................................................................................................
49
MonitoringSystem...............................................................................................................
49
Applicability.........................................................................................................................
51
Goal, Objectives and Policies.......................................................................................................
52
Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring...............................................................................
61
Implementation.........................................................................................................................
61
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures....................................................................................
63
APPENDIXA: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ...............................
66
APPENDIX B: 2030 R OA D WA Y IMPR 0 VEMENT PLAN..........................................................
85
APPENDIX C: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER CO UNTY CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE ...................................................................................................
88
APPENDIX D: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER CO UNTY SUMMAR Y OF
ESTIMATED REVENUE..............................................................................................................
90
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
ii
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
List of Figures
Figure
Title
Page
6.1
Ad Valorem Tax Revenue
3
6.2
Enterprise Fund Revenue
3
6.3
User Fees and Charges
4
6.4
Special Assessment Revenue
5
6.5
Impact Fee Revenue
5
6.6
Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
6
6.7
Tourist Development Tax
7
6.8
Local Option Fuel Tax
9
6.9
Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue
11
6.10
Half -Cent Local Government Sales Tax
13
6.11
County Revenue Sharing
14
6.12
Constitutional Fuel Tax Funds
15
6.13
County Fuel Tax
15
6.14
Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
16
6.15
Mobile Home License Tax
17
6.16
Distribution of Revenue by Category
19
6.17
General Expenditures by Function
21
6.18
Future Capital Improvements Expenditures
36
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
iii
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
List of Tables
Table
Title
Page
6.1
Indian River County Sources of Funds (FY 07/08)
2
6.2
Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities
8
6.3
Local Fuel Tax Rates
10
6.4
Indian River General Revenues by Source
18
6.5
Indian River County Expenditures by Function
19
6.6
Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt
23
6.7
Overall General Revenue Projection Summary
29
6.8
Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element
31
6.9
Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections
31
6.10
Concurrency Links Report for Transportation Projects
with Deficient Links
32
6.11
Concurrency Links Report for Removed Priority Transportation
Projects
33
6.12
Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River
County
34
6.13
Indian River County General Expenditures Projection Summary
37
6.14
Projected Expenditures for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste
37
6.15
Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections
38
6.16
Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without
39
Public Vote
6.17
Indian River County Bond Schedule
40
6.18
Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities
44
6.19
Monitoring System Design
50
6.20
Monitoring System Tasks
51
6.21
Capital Improvements Element Implementation Matrix
62
6.22
Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix
64
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
IV
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Introduction
The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the
other comprehensive plan elements and describes the financial means by which these facilities are to
be funded. This element demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and
prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the other comprehensive plan elements
based on the level of need and the availability of funds.
For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major
equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level -of -service
standards or to meet objectives identified in the county's comprehensive plan.
Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency
management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section.
Financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions
section. The fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive plan, as well as other issues
concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. The
administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed in the
concurrency management section, while the county's overall capital improvements strategy is
discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5 -Year Schedule of Capital
Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation
section of this element.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024 ,
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Existing Conditions
Financial Resources
One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of
revenue available to the county. These revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund
needed capital improvements. Table 6.1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources
and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2008/09. Table 6.1 also
shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the
revenue sources.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
K
Table 61: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2008/09)
Federal Sources
State Sources
Local Sources
Amount
% of Total
Amount
% of Total
Amount
% of Total
($1,000)
Revenue
($1,000)
Revenue
($1,000)
Revenue
Various
Grants
$12,859
5.48%
Local Government
Half -Cent Sales
Tax
$7,000
2.99%
Ad Valorem Taxes
$94,397
40.26%
Total
Federal
$12,859
5.48%
County Revenue
Sharing
$2,558
1.09%$41,531
Enterprise Funds
17.71%
Constitutional Fuel
$1,575
0.67%
User Fees and
$16,853
7.19%
Tax
Charges
Special Assessments
$487
0.21%
County Fuel Tax
$690
0.29%
Impact Fees
0.88%
Alcoholic Beverage
License Tax
$50
0.02%$2,054
Local Discretionary
$13,023
5.55%
Pari-Mutuel Tax $447 0.19%
Sales Surtax
Tourist Development
$1,294
0.55%
Mobile Home $108 0.05%
License Tax
Tax
Local Option Fuel
$3,200
1.36%
Various Grants $8,633 3.68%
Tax
Franchise Tax
$9,670
4.12%
Total State $21,061 8.98%
Interest Income
$9,788
4.17%
Other
$8,278
3.53%
Total Local
$200,575
85.53%
Total All Sources
$234,495
100.00%
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
K
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Local Sources
Local sources consist of revenues that are
levied, collected and disbursed at the local
level solely at the discretion of Indian River
County. These local sources are shown in
table 6.1, and are described in further detail
below.
• Ad Valorem Taxes (Property
Taxes)
Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the
assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real
and personal property. This tax is commonly
referred to as "property tax." Ad valorem
taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is,
thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The
state mandated millage cap is 10 mills per local
Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue
$120,000
$100,000 $99,687 $99,827
$94,397
$84,914
$80,000$74,179
$70,134
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
■ Revenue (in thousands)
government, excluding voted millages. In FY Source: Indian River County Finance Department
2008/09, Indian River County applied an
aggregate millage rate of 5.1628. According to County policy, ad valorem taxes may be used for
b tht' d 't 1 t
0 opera mg an %, Up a projec
expenditures.
Table 6.1 shows that, in FY 2008/09, Indian
River County collected approximately
$94,397,000 in ad valorem taxes. Ad valorem
taxes represented 40.26% of all revenues
collected by Indian River County in FY
2008/09.
Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax
revenue collected by Indian River County
over the last six fiscal years. During that time
period, ad valorem tax revenue increased
34.60%.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Figure 6.2: Enterprise Fund Reserve
$60,000
$50,238 $48,824
$50,000 $46,114 $44,677
$40,447 $41,531
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$o
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
❑ Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
3
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Enterprise Funds
Within governmental entities, various departments often exist that provide goods and services to the
public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title
"enterprise funds," must raise revenues from outside the government sector. Enterprise departments
assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In Indian
River County, the Utility System, Solid Waste Disposal District, Golf Course, and Building Division
are enterprises.
Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 17.71% of Indian River County's total
source of funds for FY 2008/09. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian
River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, enterprise fund revenue
increased 2.68%.
• User Fees and Charges
User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general
services. User fees and charges are
necessary because taxes alone cannot totally
keep up with the increasing costs of services.
This category includes fees collected by the
Tax Collector's Office, the Clerk of the
Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser's
Office, the Sheriff's Department, and the
Recreation and Parks Department. This
category also includes other miscellaneous
user fees charged by the county for general
services not financed by other fund sources.
In FY 2008/09, user fees and charges
represented 7.19% of all funds collected by
Indian River County.
Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges
collected by Indian River County over the
last six fiscal years. During that time period,
revenue from user fees and charges varied,
but overall increased 17.99%.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
® Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
4
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Special Assessments
Special assessments are compulsory
payments levied on real property for
specific benefits generated by public
investments or services; the assessment
levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of
the improvements. County revenues which
fall under the general category of special
assessments consist of street paving
assessments, street lighting district
assessments, as well as assessments for
water, sewer, and drainage improvements.
Expenditures of special assessment revenue
are restricted to public improvement
projects that directly benefit the property
owner or payee. For example, street paving
assessment revenues must be spent on
paving streets that directly benefit the payer
of the assessment.
Special Assessment funds represented
0.21% of county funds for FY 2008/09 as
shown in table 6.1. Figure 6.4 displays the
revenue collected by Indian River County
through special assessments over the last six
fiscal years.
• Impact Fees
An impact fee is a one time charge, fee, or
assessment levied as a condition of
subdivision or site plan approval, building
permit issuance, certificate of occupancy
issuance, or other development or
construction approval when the revenues
collected are intended to fund the costs of
capital improvements for any public
facilities.
Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue
$600$552
$500 $494 $487
$400 $392 $377
$345
$300
$200
$100
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
❑ Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.5: Impact Fee Revenue
$40,000 $36,297
$35,000
$30,000
$ 24,634
$25,000
$20,000
$15,000
$10,41D
$10,000 $7,007
$ 5,432
$5,000 $2,054
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
❑ Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
5
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
of 2005, Indian River County began to levy 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County
increased the existing traffic impact fee rates. The nine impact fees include: traffic, emergency
services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement,
libraries, and public buildings.
On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce
impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion,
the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The
five suspended impact fees are: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law
enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010 the Board of
County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. The current
suspension of impact fees will expire on March 31, 2011.
Figure 6.5 shows the substantial increase in impact fee revenues related to the addition of the eight
new impact fees and the increase in traffic impact fee rates. In FY 2003/04, traffic impact fees
represented 5.17% of funds collected by Indian River County. In contrast, traffic impact fees and
the eight additional impact fees represented 14.31% of funds collected by Indian River County for
FY 2004/05. Since FY 2004/05, impact fee funds have dramatically declined with the slowing
economy and the suspension of five of the impact fees.
Local Discretionary Sales Surtax
Pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S, local
governments are authorized to levy
numerous types of local discretionary sales
surtaxes. Under the provisions of s.
212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales
surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to
the state tax imposed on sales, services,
rentals, admissions, and other authorized
transactions. The surtax is computed by
multiplying the rate imposed by the county
where the sale occurs by the amount of the
taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied
on most transactions under $5,000.
Under this category, Indian River County
is eligible to impose a Local Government
Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or
Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales
Surtax
$18,000
$15,736
$16,000 $15,sas
$14,550
$13,714
$14,000 $12,850 $13,023
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
❑ Revenue (in thousands)
1.0% and a School Capital Outlay Surtax Source.- Indian River County Finance Department
of up to 0.5%. Currently, Indian River County imposes only the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
6
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
According to state law, the Local Government Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority
vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum.
This surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was initiated by Indian
River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002. Generally, the
proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public
recreation or conservation or protection of natural resources; and to finance the closure of local
government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of
the Department of Environmental Protection.
Table 6.1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 5.55% of all funds collected by Indian
River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue
received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased
by 1.35% over that period.
Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a
formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is
distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on
population.
Currently, twenty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure
Surtax. Within Indian River County's region, Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie counties do not
levy the surtax, while Martin County levies a 0.5% infrastructure surtax. Okeechobee County is
eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, but instead levies a Small County Surtax of I%, which is
another local discretionary sales surtax.
• Tourist Development Tax
Any county in the state may, subject to a vote of
the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development
Tax. The transient rental trade is the primary
base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging
agreement for six months or less is subject to the
tax.
Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two
percent. Counties, however, may set an
additional one percent above the original tax
through an extraordinary vote of the governing
board or by referendum. Currently, Indian
River County imposes the original two percent
tourist tax as well as an additional one percent
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax
Revenue
$1,800 $1,676
$1,517 $1,585
$1,600 — $1,449
$1,400 $1,294
$1,200 $1,082
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
❑ Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
7
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
tax. Sixty Florida counties out of sixty-seven total counties currently levy a tourist tax. Of those
sixty counties, forty-three counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent
tourist tax.
Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian
River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of
tourist taxes. Brevard, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie Counties have the highest tourist tax levy of the
six counties listed (5.0%). Indian River County and Martin County each have a tourist tax rate of
4.00%. Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy.
Table 6.2: Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities
Additional
Professional
Original
Additional
Sports
Professional
Maximum
°
Total /°
County
Tourist
Sports
Potential
Tax
Franchise
Levy
Tax
Facility Tax
Franchise
%Levy
Tax
Brevard
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
5.00%
5.00%
Indian River
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
----------
5.00%
4.00%
Martin
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
----------
5.00%
4.00%
Okeechobee
2.00%
1.00%
----------
----------
5.00%
3.00%
Palm Beach
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
5.00%
5.00%
St. Lucie
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
5.00%
5.00%
Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax
Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information
Handbook. October 2010.
The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes:
(1) Acquire, construct, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated
convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the
district that the tax is imposed;
(2) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida;
(3) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by
contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county;
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
8
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
(4) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and
restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access;
(5) Construct, improve, maintain, and promote museums, zoos, fishing piers, or nature centers
which are publicly owned and operated either by the county or a not-for-profit organization
which opens the facilities to the public (applicable to those counties with a population less
than 500,000);
(6) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county,
subject to certain limitations.
Figure 6.7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the
last six fiscal years. During that time period, tourist tax revenue received by Indian River County
fluctuated based on market conditions, but had an overall increase of 19.59%.
• Local Option Fuel Tax
Local governments are authorized to levy up to
twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the
form of three separate levies. These levies are:
➢ a one to six cent local option fuel
tax;
➢ a one to five cent local option
fuel tax; and
➢ a ninth cent fuel tax.
Indian River County currently imposes the full
six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. This tax
applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel
fuel sold within a county. The one to six cent
fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance
adopted by a majority vote of the governing
Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax
Revenue
$3,400 $3,367
$3,324 $3,319
$3,300 $3::t7l
290
$3,200 $ 3,200
$3,100
$3,000
$2,900
$2,800
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
■ Revenue (in thousands)
body or voter approval In a county -wide Source: Indian River County Finance Department
referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures.
Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 1.36% of all funds collected by Indian
River County for FY 2008/09. Figure 6.8 shows that local option fuel tax revenue for the county has
decreased overall by 3.73% from what it was in Fiscal Year 2004. Even though local option fuel tax
revenues were less in fiscal year 2009 than what they were in fiscal year 2004, the county received a
significant increase in local option fuel tax revenue in fiscal years 2005 through 2007. This was
largely associated with the building boom.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
9
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
All sixty-seven Florida counties levy a portion of the original local option fuel tax. Sixty-five
counties levy the full $0.06, while the remaining two counties levy a portion of the tax.
Table 6.3 shows the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the
region. Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties levy the highest fuel taxes at
$0.12 per gallon. Those four counties impose both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent
Local Option Fuel Tax. While Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax and
the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County
Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, it does not currently levy either
tax. At this time, fifty-one of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax, while
twenty-four of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent
Local Option Fuel Tax.
Table 6.3: Local Fuel Tax Rates
County
One to Six Cent
Local Option Fuel
Tax
One to Five Cent
Local Option Fuel
Tax
Ninth Cent Fuel Tax
Total Local Fuel Tax
Brevard
$0.06
--------
--------
$0.06
Indian River
$0.06
--------
--------
$0.06
Martin
$0.06
$0.05
$0.01
$0.12
Okeechobee
$0.06
$0.05
$0.01
$0.12
Palm Beach
$0.06
$0.05
$0.01
$0.12
St. Lucie
$0.06
$0.05
$0.01
$0.12
Source: Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations, Local Government Financial Information Handbook. October
2010.
Franchise Fee/Tax
Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for
the grant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local government's rights-of-way to
conduct the utility's business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement
negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives
franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
10
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 4.12% of all funds collected by Indian River
County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.9 shows that over the last six fiscal years franchise fee revenue
collected by Indian River County increased 43.90%.
• Other Miscellaneous Revenue
Included in this category are various
administrative fees, licenses and permits,
fines, interest income, rental income, private
contributions, and other miscellaneous
revenues. This source of revenue for Indian
River County represented 3.53% of all funds
collected in FY 2008/09.
• Borrowing
As needed, the county uses borrowing as a
financing vehicle to raise money for public
purposes that are beyond the realm of current
cash reserves, operating revenue and
Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue
$12,000
$10,000 $9,318 $9,733 $9,443 $9,670
$ 7,941
$8,000
$ 6,720
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
■ Revenue (in thousands)
reasonable taxation. Currently, borrowing
money to pay for capital improvements can be source: Inaian river county Finance Department
done through either short-term or long-term financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished
by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement of Voted
General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance of bonds sold
on the public market.
According to state law, local governments may sell bonds for capital improvements without a
referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is a non -ad valorem revenue source.
Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum.
General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the county. These
bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the
amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not
subject to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and
require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance.
Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of
the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds. Because revenue bonds are payable from identified
sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
11
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects,
grants, or other specified non -ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance
or validation of such obligations.
In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer,
potable water, and golf course facilities. In addition, revenue bonds have been issued by the Housing
Authority to finance the provision of more low-income housing units in the county. Also, revenue
bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects.
Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for these projects,
whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off
the debt.
Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas
or groups of property owners. Proceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property
owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of these bonds does not need to be approved
by voter referendum.
Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment
bond debt is paid -off by assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing
user charges. The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal.
The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than
five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter
maturity dates than bonds. Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover
gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in
anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond
issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes.
• Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources
Use of additional revenue sources may occasionally be necessary, depending on priorities mandated
by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. Indian River
County has two options to increase local revenues. These are to implement new taxes that are
permitted by state regulation and/or to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the
county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent
Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility
Tax.
Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the
purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special
fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
12
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds. Authorized
uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of
establishing, operating, and maintaining a transportation system and related facilities. Additional
uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads.
The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every
gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from this fuel tax must be shared among
all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical
transportation expenditures formula. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five
Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital
Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to 1% on any lodging agreement for six
months or less. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance
the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility.
State Sources
Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to
the county. For example, state sources may originate from state general revenues and be shared by
the state according to state revenue allocation formulas. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources
applicable to Indian River County. These sources are described in further detail below.
• Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax
The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax
Program allocates 8.814% of net sales tax
proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a
county to a special account administered by
the Department of Revenue; this account is the
Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax
Clearing Trust Fund. These funds are then
earmarked for distribution to the governing
body of the county and each municipality
within the county. Distribution of these
monies within the county is determined by a
formula that uses a weighting factor based on
the population of the incorporated and
unincorporated areas and multiplies this factor
by 8.814% of the sales tax proceeds received
for the county. In FY 2008/09, Indian River
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue
$10,000
$9,000 $8,747 $8,777
$ 8,123
$8,000 $7,564 $7,588
$ 7,000
$7,000
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
❑ Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
13
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
County received $7,000,000 through the half -cent sales tax. As shown in table 6.1, that amount
represented 2.99% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 2008/09 fiscal year.
Figure 6.10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half -cent local
government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Over those six fiscal years, Indian River County's
half -cent sales tax revenue decreased 7.46%.
Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility
criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the
maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments are allowed wide latitude in using the
half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for
countywide tax relief or countywide programs.
• County Revenue Sharing
The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. These
0
sources Include 2.90-/o of net cigarette tax
collections and 2.044% of sales and use tax
collections. Proceeds are collected by the
state and then distributed to eligible counties
based on an allocation formula. There are no
use restrictions on the distributed revenue;
however, there are some statutory limitations
regarding these funds being used as a pledge
for indebtedness.
To receive distribution proceeds through the
county revenue sharing program, counties
must meet the following criteria:
(1) That law enforcement officers and
firefighters are certified and meet
state requirements;
Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing
$3,500
$3,118 $3,084
$3,000 $2,894 $2,835 $2,850
EE
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
❑ Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
(2) That certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct
manner to the Department of Revenue;
(3) That the county's most recent financial reports have been sent to the Department of Banking
and Finance, and post audits of these statements and accounts have been provided.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
14
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing funds represented 1.09% of all funds collected by Indian
River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.11 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county revenue
sharing proceeds received by Indian River County varied over time, but overall decreased by 11.61 %.
• Constitutional Fuel Tax
Constitutional fuel tax is defined as an
excise or license tax of two cents per
gallon imposed upon the first sale or first
removal from storage (after importation
into Florida) of motor fuel. Revenues
from this levy become state funds at the
time of collection by the refiner, importer
or wholesaler.
In its current form, the constitutional fuel
tax is a state -shared revenue source for
counties only. Applying a distribution
formula, the state allocates proceeds to
counties to the extent necessary to
comply with all obligations to or for the
benefit of holders of bonds, revenue
certificates, and tax anticipation
certificates or any refunds secured by any
portion of the tax proceeds. After
complying with the necessary debt service
obligations, the state distributes a county's
surplus funds to its governing body.
Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from
the constitutional fuel tax levy represented
0.67% of total revenue received by Indian
River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.12
shows that, over the last six fiscal years,
constitutional fuel tax revenue received by
Indian River County decreased 5.35%.
• County Fuel Tax
The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel
at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The
legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue
$1,800 $1,763
$1,750 $1,729 $1,716
$1,700 $1,664
$1,650 $1,618
$1,600 $1,575
$1,550
$1,500
$1,450
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
10 Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Indian River County
15
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be used by a county for
transportation -related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for
transportation purposes.
Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.29% of all
revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 2008/09. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six
fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County decreased 7.01%.
• Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied
on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and
sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in
Florida. The tax is administered, collected,
enforced, and distributed to local
governments by the Division of Alcoholic
Beverages and Tobacco within the
Department of Business and Professional
Regulation.
Twenty-four percent of the license taxes
imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor
collected within a county is returned to the
county Tax Collector. The remaining funds
are used to operate the division and
contribute to the operation of the Office of
the Secretary of Business Regulation.
Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax
$60 $ 54
$50 $51 $49 $50
$50 $4a
$40
$30
$20 -
$10
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Gi Revenue (in thousands)
Source: Indian River County Finance Department
Table 6.1 shows that the county received
approximately $50,000 from this tax in FY 2008/09, 0.02% of all revenue received by Indian River
County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue
received by Indian River County fluctuated, but overall remained about the same.
• Pari-Mutuel Tax
Revenue generated through license fees and taxes related to Pari-Mutuel betting is deposited into the
Pari-Mutuel wagering trust fund. According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of
$29,915,500 is deducted from the trust fund for equal distributions among Florida's sixty-seven
counties, providing each county's general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue
received from the Pari-Mutuel tax represented 0.19% of revenues received by Indian River County in
FY 2008/09. Uses for this revenue are determined by the Board of County Commissioners.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
16
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• Mobile Home License Tax
An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and
fifth -wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to
$80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by
the county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.
From each license, two deductions are made.
The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the
Department of Highway Safety and Motor
Vehicles with proceeds deposited into the
State General Revenue Fund. The second is
a deduction of $1.00 with proceeds
deposited into the Florida Mobile Home
Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining
balance is deposited into the License Tax
Collection Trust Fund for distribution to
units of local government. A county
government is eligible to receive proceeds
from this tax if taxable mobile home units
are located in its unincorporated area. An
authorized use of the proceeds is not
specified in the current law.
Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Revenue
$160 $T3
$140
$120 $10 $105 $105 $105 $105
$100 11
$80
$60
$40
$20
$-
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
■ Revenue (in thousands)
Table 6.1 shows that funds received through Source: Indian River County Finance Department
the mobile home license tax represented 0.05% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY
2008/09. Figure 6.15 shows that, over the last five fiscal years, mobile home license tax revenue
received by Indian River County remained the same.
• Various Grants
Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 5.48% of funds received
by the county in FY 2008/09. State grant funds received by the county in FY 2008/09 originated from
the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, the Florida Housing Finance Agency, the
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State of Florida Department of State
Division of Library Services, the State of Florida Department of Transportation, the State of Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the State of Florida Department of Revenue, the
Department of Health, the Department of Law Enforcement, and the Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
17
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Federal Sources
Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for
administration and monitoring. These grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than
by formula allocations, thereby making projections of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of
revenue projections, these sources will be assumed to remain constant.
During FY 2008/09, the county received approximately $12,859,000 in federal funds. These funds
represented 5.48% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 2008/09.
Overall Revenue Sources
As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the
state Chart of Accounts. These categories include taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental
revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, interest, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4
identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from these sources for fiscal years 2002/2003
through 2007/08.
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2009 & Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of
the last six fiscal years.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
18
Table 6.4: Indian River County General Revenues By Source
Fiscal
Year
Taxes
Licenses &
Permits
Intergovernmental
Revenue
Charges for
Services
Fines &
Forfeitures
Miscellaneo
us Revenues
Totals
2003/04
$95,675,370
$1,033,394
$51,487,093
$54,729,505
$1,508,786
$14,545,961
$218,980,109
2004/05
$104,012,925
$1,354,282
$82,604,757
$68,389,360
$1,715,875
$42,170,294
$300,247,493
2005/06
$116,088,548
$1,274,638
$66,278,020
$68,028,618
$2,069,593
$40,182,777
$293,922,194
2006/07
$130,158,069
$896,612
$64,054,273
$65,111,301
$2,403,093
$26,773,753
$289,397,101
2007/08
$119,915,640
$9,904,590
$60,086,565
$63,355,209
$2,137,413
$18,486,026
$273,885,443
2008/09
$113,689,399
$12,433,598
$39,249,261
$58,384,013
$1,792,517
$8,946,401
$234,495,189
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2009 & Indian River County Finance Department
Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of
the last six fiscal years.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
18
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category
2004
43.69%
0.47%
6.64%
°
0.69 /0 24.99%
23.51%
2007
44.98%
9.25% 0.31%
0.83%_
22.13%
22.50%
■ Taxes
❑ Charges for Services
Expenditures
2005
34.64%
0.45%
14.05%ji
- 27.51
0.57%
22.78%
2008
43.78%
3.62%
6.75% 21.94%
0.78%-' 23.13%
❑ Licenses & Permits
■ Fines & Forfeitures
2006
39.50% 0.43%
13.67% 22.55%
0.70% 23.15%
2009
48.48% 5.30%
16.74%
0
3.82 /0 24.90%
0.76%
❑ Intergovernmental Revenue
❑ Miscellaneous Revenues
In the previous sub -section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by Indian
River County were reviewed. This sub -section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how
those monies are allocated to meet the county's needs. Table 6.5 presents the county's overall
general expenditures by category for fiscal years 2003/2004 through 2008/09.
Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Function
Fiscal Year
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
General Government
$29,005,917
$30,565,484
$60,435,102
$63,231,330
$30,711,818
$25,801,688
Public Safety
$55,792,130
$57,161,390
$66,984,420
$73,275,110
$74,038,252
$74,813,164
Physical Environment
$44,317,270
53,990,669
$54,445,121
$82,894,477
$86,515,929
$54,243,069
Transportation
$23,038,234
$22,369,128
$31,966,926
$55,039,978
$53,489,116
$40,841,272
Economic Environment
$627,914
$712,517
$1,054,239
$968,227
$4,579,574
$653,547
Human Services
$7,197,342
$7,279,582
$12,470,222
$13,862,463
$12,619,575
$8,621,760
Culture/Recreation
$17,828,311
$24,298,539
$19,977,771
$27,989,515
$24,075,260
$19,624,278
Court Related
$6,210,614
$5,630,734
$5,915,727
$6,649,724
$6,940,682
$6,620,830
Debt Service
$3,727,534
$3,495,500
$4,406,090
$8,126,643
$7,873,176
$8,068,758
TOTAL
187,745,266
205,503,543
$257,655,618
$332,037,467
$300,843,382
$239,288,366
Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2009
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
19
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county's activities in any given
fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the
percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the last six fiscal years.
General Government
A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government
expenditure category, includes activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of
the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County
Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category as do all Constitutional Officers,
except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $25,801,688 was spent on general government services in
FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2003/04 and 2008/09, general government expenditures decreased
by 11.05%. General government services represented 10.78% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
The significant increase in general government expenditures in Fiscal Years 2005/06 and 2006/07
was due to the construction of new public buildings, including the construction of the new county
administration building and the expansion of the jail.
Public Safety
The Sheriff's Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the
Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY
2008/09, spent $74,813,164 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09,
public safety expenditures increased by 1.05%. Since FY 2003/04, public safety expenditures have
increased by 34.09%. Public safety represented 40.17% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Physical Environment
This classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste
Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land
Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $54,243,069 was spent on these activities in FY 2008/09.
Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09, physical environment expenditures decreased by 37.30%.
Since FY2003/04, physical environment expenditures have increased by 22.40%. Physical
environment services represented 22.6% of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Transportation
Departments under this category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads
Construction, and Traffic Engineering. These departments are responsible for designing,
constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As shown in
table 6.5, the county spent $40,841,272 on transportation facilities in FY 2008/09. Since FY 2003/04,
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
20
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
transportation expenditures have increased by 77.28%. Transportation expenses represented 21.93%
of all county expenses in FY 2008/09.
Economic Environment
Included in this category are the costs of providing services which develop and improve the economic
condition of the community and its citizens. Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the
Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce undertake this
function. Table 6.5 shows that those agencies spent $653,547 on economic environment services in
FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2006/07 and 2007/08, economic environment expenditures
increased by 372.99%. Since FY 2002/03, economic environment expenditures have increased by
684.38%. Economic environment expenses represented 1.89% of all county expenses in FY 2007/08.
Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function
2004
23.6%
29.7%
12.3%
15.4% 0.3%
0 3.3% 9.5%
2.0/o 3.8%
2007 22.1
25.0%
19.0%
2.4%---
`4.2°0 16.6%
2.0%-/8.4%0.3%
❑ General Government
o Transportation
o Culture/Recreation
Human Services
2005
26.3% 10.9%
27.8%0.3%
3.5%
14."17%2.7/o 0 11.8%
24.6% 2008
28.8%
10.2%
2.6%
2.3%
8.0%4.2% 1.5/0 ° -17.8%
m Public Safety
■ Economic Environment
D Court Related
2006
26.0%
21.1%
23.5%
1.7% -12.4%
2.3% 7.8% 4.8% 0.4%
31.3% 2009
10.8%-122.7%
3.4%-
17.1 %
2.8%*8.2% 3.603°0 0.3%
❑ Physical Environment
❑ Human Services
o Debt Service
Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human
illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals.
The Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children's Services fall into this category. Table 6.5
shows that the county spent $8,621,760 on human services in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
21
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2007/08 and 2008/09, human services expenditures decreased by 31.68%. Since FY 2003/04, human
services expenditures have increased by 19.79%. Human services represented 3.60% of all county
expenses in FY 2008/09.
Culture/Recreation
All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities
for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation
operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent
$19,624,278 on these services in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09,
cultural/recreation expenditures decreased by 18.49%. Since FY 2003/04, cultural/recreation
expenditures have increased by 10.07%. Culture/recreation expenses represented 8.20% of all county
expenses in FY 2008/09.
Court Related
All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here.
This category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney's Office and Public Defender.
As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from this category totaled $6,620,830 in FY 2008/09. Between
fiscal years 2007/08 and 2008/09, Court Related expenditures decreased by 4.61 %. Beginning in FY
1997/1998, the State of Florida mandated that the county begin recording Court Related costs as a
separate expenditure item. Court Related costs represented 2.77% of all county expenses in FY
2008/09.
Debt Service
Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. This figure includes
principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total
county debt service expenditures were $8,068,758 in FY 2008/09. Between fiscal years 2007/08 and
2008/09, debt service expenditures increased by 2.48%. Since FY 2003/04, debt service expenditures
have increased by 116.46%. Debt service expenses represented 3.37% of all county expenses in FY
2008/09.
Existing Outstanding Debt
At the end of FY 2009/10, Indian River County's outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and
general obligation bonds, stood at $108,815,000. This is shown in table 6.6. In 1993, the county took
advantage of lower interest rates and refunded any debt that had reasonable future economic savings.
Enterprise Funds support 48.73% of the overall debt (Utility Dept 45.81 %; and Golf Course 2.92%),
leaving $55,790,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds. In November 2001, Indian
River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
22
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Acquisition general obligation bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 2001, the
County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and
expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility (now known as the Vero Beach Sports
Complex). Two bonds were refinanced in 2003 to take advantage of lower interest rates: the 1993
Series Refunded Recreational Revenue Bonds and the 1995 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition
Bonds. Those bonds have since been paid off. In 2004, Indian River County voters approved the
issuance of up to an additional $50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general
obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive
Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. Finally, the county refinanced its 1996 Series
Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005 and the majority of its 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds in
2009. The County kept a portion of the 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds with a maturity of
2011 because it was more cost efficient than rolling the entire amount into the 2009 Water and Sewer
Bonds.
Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt
Amount
Average
Initial
Remaining
Interest
Final
Bond Rating
Amount
(&09/30/2010
Rate
Maturity
Security Pledge
Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds:
1993 A Series
$47,190,000
5.76%
2011
AAA/FGIC
Water & Sewer
$1,555,000
(Insured)
Revenues
AAA/FGIC
Water & Sewer
2005 Series
$27,675,000
$21,925,000
o
3.94/0
2022
(insured)
Revenues
Water & Sewer
2009 Series
$26,370,000
$26,370,000
3.68%
2024
AA /AA
Revenues
Recreation Revenue Bonds
2001 Series Spring
$16,810,000
4.87%
2031
AAA/FGIC
State Funds, 'h Cent
Training Facility
$12,310,000
(Insured)
Sales Tax, Tourist Tax
Golf Course Net
2003 Series
Income, Fronton
Refunding
$6,455,000
3.65%
2016
AAA/AMAC
Revenue and
Recreational
$3,175,000
(Insured)
Subordinate Lien on
Revenue
One Half Cent Sales
Tax
Voted G.O. Bonds
Environmental
Lands Acquisition
$11,000,000
3.89%
2016
General Obligation
2001 Series
$5,210,000
IdA
(Insured)
Environmental
AAA/MBIA
Lands Acquisition
$48,600,000
4.22"/o
2021
(Insured)
General Obligation
2006 Series
$38,270,000
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
23
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt
Amount
Average
Initial
Remaining
Interest
Final
Bond Rating
Amount
(r�09/30/2010
Rate
Maturity
Security Pledge
Total Bonds
Outstanding
$108,815,000
Source: Indian River County Budget 2010/11.
Local Policies and Practices
As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current
Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in
capacity of capital facilities. These policies and practices relate to the county's existing level -of -
service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts.
Existing Level -of -Service Standards
Level -of -service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or
proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the
facility. Level -of -service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility.
Level -of -service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development
to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level -of -service
standards for capital facilities as follows:
➢ Correctional Facilities (Countywide)
• 4.5 beds per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores)
• .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County)
• 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Libraries (Countywide)
• 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
• 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
• 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
• 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal
population
➢ Potable Water (County Service Area)
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
24
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
• 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
Public Buildings (Countywide)
• 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County)
• 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area)
• 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit
➢ Schools (School Service Area):
• 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school
type (elementary, middle, and high).
➢ Solid Waste (Countywide)
2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population per year
➢ Stormwater Management
• New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall
event
• Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during
resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm
event on local roads
• The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a
10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads
• All drainage basins will meet the following level -of -service standards:
• By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour storm event
By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event
By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event
➢ Transportation (Roadways)
Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on
all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways,
with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E"
plus 20%:
• 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60
• 43rd Ave - Oslo Road to 16th Street
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
25
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service `B" is adopted
for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas.
➢ Transit
• One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes
Level -of -service standards are discussed in further detail in each individual Comprehensive Plan
Element.
Capital Improvements Program
A capital improvements program (CIP) is a program for capital expenditures to be incurred each year
over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs. In Indian River County, the CIP
identifies the projects that the county plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an
estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the
first year of the CIP reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection.
Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue
sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years
four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue
sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one planned
revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local option gas
tax.
The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all
elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The
overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to
implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next
five years.
Impact Fees/Capacity Charles
Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local
government to serve new development. This financing technique is one strategy that the county uses
for implementing the CIE. Currently, the county has nine impact fees in place; these are traffic
impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective
in June of 2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories:
solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement,
libraries, and public buildings.
In October 1999, the county's water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A
capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
26
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new
utility customers.
Enterprise Funds
Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to
private business enterprises, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing
the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through
user charges. Currently, the county operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building
department services, and utility services as enterprise funds.
As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to
vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for
providing services further from urban areas, and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way,
user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas.
Analysis
The analysis section of this element assesses the county's historic and projected revenue and
expenditure patterns to determine the county's fiscal ability to provide adequate capital
improvements. These capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan
elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development.
As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal
assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included.
Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements
Objectives and polices from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary
Sewer Sub -Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the
Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriff's office and County departments
such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Libraries, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect
on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to
the transportation system, the Transportation Element directly affects the development potential of
property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection
requirements and the availability of public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element
(FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area
regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements.
Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the county's comprehensive plan,
the county provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
27
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in
under utilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be
present to accommodate future growth. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling
urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system.
Using the county's official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the
county's water and wastewater connection matrix, in planning for future locations of facilities
provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities, provides for efficient growth in
desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands.
Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination that adequate
public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of the new development.
Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable
Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are
furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. This is
accomplished by implementing and enforcing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its
corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation of those
items ensures that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future development.
If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements
and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards, future development
will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. This, in effect, indirectly controls the
timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future
Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives.
Appendix A constitutes the county's five year schedule of capital improvements. This CIP is
important to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are
completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county
will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels
of service.
Besides implementing the components of this element, the county coordinates with the St. Johns
River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida
Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within
Indian River County. The continuation of this coordination will ensure that the plans of state
agencies and the SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and
location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE.
Protected Revenues
In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over
the five-year CIP time period have been calculated. These revenues are then compared to anticipated
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
28
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and
available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for this process, historic
revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends,
legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams were considered.
This analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. This is evident in the
forecasted revenues shown in this section.
During the past five years, there has been a gradual decrease in most revenue sources. Estimates
going forward show a decrease in most revenue sources for the next couple years followed by
moderate increases. This is consistent with the current economic recession followed by an
anticipated moderate recovery thereafter.
Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales
taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances. The analysis accounts for such
differences. Because gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a percentage basis like the
sales tax, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way sales taxes do. Further, gas
taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. Property
taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues have additional behavioral
characteristics that were considered in estimating future receipts. All such estimates were developed
with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see
Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues.
As part of this capital improvements element, the county's general revenues have been projected for
fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked
projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections.
Overall Projected Revenues
Table 6.7 summarizes the county's projected revenue for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. These
revenues include the county's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As
table 6.7 shows, general revenue collected by the county is projected to decrease slightly in the next
fiscal year and increase by only 3.22% by fiscal year 2014/15. Overall, general revenue is projected
to increase from $278,508,044 in FY 2010/11 to $287,466,627 in FY 2014/15.
Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary
FY
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
TOTAL
Taxes
96,290,805
100,034,202
100,034,000
105,392,971
108,028,000
509,779,978
Licenses &
Permits
20,754,256
20,754,000
21,273,000
21,805,000
22,350,000
106,936,256
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
29
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
TOTAL
FY
Intergovern-
ment
18,691,686
18,692,000
19,159,000
19,638,000
20,129,000
96,309,686
Charges for
Services
60,009,228
60,009,000
61,509,000
63,047,000
64,623,000
309,197,228
Fines &
Forfeitures
312,000
312,000
320,000
328,000
336,000
1,608,000
Interest &
Misc.
18,494,670
18,495,000
18,957,000
19,431,000
19,917,000
95,294,670
Other Sources
63,955,399
32,653,315
43,795,823
43,221,820
52,083,627
235,709,984
TOTAL
278,508,044
250,949,517
265,047,823
272,863,791
287,466,627
1,354,835,802
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Earmarked Projected Revenues
Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in
the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, and Solid
Waste Sub -Element.
Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue projections by applicable comprehensive plan
element for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. As shown in table 6.8, projected transportation
revenues are broken down by their sources. Earmarked projected transportation revenues are
expected to increase by 30.66% over the next five fiscal years, from $19,025,710 in FY 2010/11 to
$24,859,880 in FY 2014/15.
Although transportation revenues are expected to increase from FY 10/11 to FY 14/15, it is important
to note that FY 10/11 transportation revenue is $35,764,991 less than FY 2004/05 transportation
revenue. This reflects the substantial decrease in traffic impact fee revenue from the housing boom
years to the present. Part of the transportation revenue increase for fiscal year 2013/14 and fiscal year
2014/15 is from a planned 6 cent per gallon tax increase on gasoline (Local Option Gas Tax). In
fiscal year 2013/14, the proposed additional 6 cent per gallon gas tax plus the county's current 6 cent
per gallon gas tax (total of 12 cents per gallon) will be bonded to produce a significant revenue
increase in FY 2014/15.
For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by 7.69% over the
next five fiscal years, from $27,333,363 in FY 2010/11 to $29,434,000 in FY 2014/15. Over the next
five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by 7.69% from $10,713,852 in
FY 2010/11 to $11,538,000 in FY 2014/15.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
30
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.8: Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element
Transportation
Potable
Emergency Services
Local
Fiscal
General Fund
M.S.T.U.
1 cent
Acquisition
Year
Fiscal
Water &
Solid Waste
Year
Option Gas
Constitutional
County
Traffic
optional
Interest on
Total
T
Sanitary
Millage
Tax Base
Tax
Gas Tax
Gas Tax
Impact Fee
sales tax
Gas Tax
$7,820,732,737
Sewer
$11,640,087,880
2010/11
1 3,313,710
1,550,000
682,000
1,200,000
12,000,000
280,000
19,025,710
27,333,363
10,713,852
2011/12
3,314,000
1,550,000
682,000
1,650,000
12,000,000
280,000
19,476,000
27,333,000
10,714,000
2012/13
3,347,000
1,566,000
689,000
2,256,196
12,300,000
280,000
20,438,196
28,016,000
10,982,000
2013/14
$13,675,013,020
3.0892
$7,559,324,745
1.0733
$11,251,017,943
1.7148
$13,675,013,020
0.0699
6,237,971
11582,000
696,000
2,600,000
12,608,000
280,000
24,003,971
28,716,000
11,257,000
2014/15
1
6,300,000
1,598,000
703,000
3,055,880
12,923,000
280,000
24,859,880
29,434,000
11,538,000
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
• Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate
Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base projections which are categorized by fund through FY
2014/15. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category
identified in table 6.9.
Table 6.9: Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections
Emergency Services
Environmental Land
Fiscal
General Fund
M.S.T.U.
District
Acquisition
Year
Tax Base
Millage
Tax Base
Millage
Tax Base
Millage
Tax Base
Millage
2010/11
$14,147,906,804
3.0892
$7,820,732,737
1.0733
$11,640,087,880
1.7148
$14,147,906,804
0.0681
2011/12
$13,016,074,260
3.0892
$7,195,074,118
1.0733
$10,708,880,850
1.7148
$13,016,074,260
0.0735
2012/13
$13,016,074,260
3.0892
$7,195,074,118
1.0733
$10,708,880,850
1.7148
$13,016,074,260
0.0735
2013/14
$13,341,476,117
3.0892
$7,374,950,971
1.0733
$10,976,602,871
1.7148
$13,341,476,117
0.0717
2014/15
$13,675,013,020
3.0892
$7,559,324,745
1.0733
$11,251,017,943
1.7148
$13,675,013,020
0.0699
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency
services district, each with a separate millage.
Chanes to the Capital Improvements Program
With the ongoing depressed housing market, challenges in the national and global financial markets,
and the reduction in building permit activity, county revenue again decreased and is expected to
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
31
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
remain lower than projected in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program (Fiscal Years 2009/10
through 2013/14). As a result of the decrease in projected revenue and the associated decrease in
projected demand for public facilities, the overall Capital Improvements Program has been scaled
back. Consequently, a number of projects within the 2009/10 through 2013/14 CIP have had their
time frame extended.
None of the changes will impact development project concurrency reservations. Because of the
depressed housing market, problems with the financial markets, and limited construction activity, it is
anticipated that the capacity associated with most of these projects will not be needed until later
dates.
Two of the transportation projects that have had their construction dates extended involve
improvements to roadways that are over capacity according to the County's concurrency management
system. Listed in Table 6.10, these deficient links are C.R. 510 between 58th Avenue and U.S.
Highway 1 and AIA from 17th Street to the south city limits of the City of Vero Beach. While the
transportation projects designed to improve these deficient links are being rescheduled to later years
of the CIP, there are several factors that are expected to increase available capacity in the short term.
One such factor is that concurrency certificates for some development projects with vested trips will
expire soon. At that time, the reserved trips reflected by those projects will be removed from the
concurrency management system. Another factor is that recent traffic counts indicate that traffic
volumes are continuing to decrease on most roadways. These new traffic counts will soon be
reflected in the County's concurrency management system. At that time, the increased capacity and
decreased demand will have the effect of increasing the available capacity on County roadways and
will likely further decrease the need for scheduling, financing, and constructing transportation
projects in the County's CIP.
By extending the time frame of transportation projects, the county can utilize its limited resources to
complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In
effect, the county needs to delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable with a
diminishing county budget. By funding only necessary projects, the County is also maintaining a
financially feasible capital improvements element.
Table 6.10: C neurrency
Links Report for Transportation Projects
with deficient
links
Transportation Project
With Deficient Link
Link #
Link Description
Capacity*
Total
Demand*
Available*
CR 510, 61St Drive to Indian
River, four lanes (1.6 miles)
1830E
1830W
1840E
1840W
C.R. 510, 58th Avenue to U.S. 1
C.R. 510, 58th Avenue to U.S. 1
C.R. 510, U.S. 1 to S.R. AIA
C.R. 510, U.S. 1 to S.R. AIA
810.00
707.26
102.74
810.00
874.76
-64.76
2,049.00
715.66
1,333.34
2,049.00
775.48
1,273.52
17th Street/AIA Intersection
1020N
1020S
1030N
S.R. AIA, Southern Vero Beach City Limits
to 17`h Street
S.R. AIA, Southern Vero Beach City Limits
to 17th Street
S.R. AIA, 17th Street to S.R. 60
930.00
1,081.37
-151.37
930.00
1,058.13
-128.13
924.00
707.00
217.00
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
32
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.10: C ncurrency Links Report for Transportation Pro'ects
with deficient
links
Transportation Project
With Deficient Link
Link #
Link Description
Capacity*
Total
Demand*
Available*
2925N
1030S
S.R. AIA, 17th Street to S.R. 60
924.00
832.00
92.00
2120E
17th Street, Indian River Boulevard to S.R.
AIA
1,960.00
1,017.77
942.23
212OW
17th Street, Indian River Boulevard to S.R.
AIA
1,960.00
1,202.30
757.70
*Peak hour, directional trips
Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program
The Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program is a list of transportation projects for
which a specific start date and a specific completion date are listed. As allowed by state law, the
County considers the additional capacity to be produced by these roadway improvement projects as
being available now for concurrency purposes. As such, a development project impacting a deficient
link can proceed despite the deficient link where a roadway improvement project for the deficient link
will be under construction no later than three years after issuance of the first building permit for the
development project.
Because of lower demand on area roadways from the depressed housing market and the pending
expiration of concurrency certificates for previously approved developments, the Priority
Transportation Capital Improvements Program is no longer needed. Therefore, this CIE no longer
includes a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program.
Of the four projects previously listed in the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program,
two of those projects were removed because they will be under construction within the next six
months. Those projects are: Oslo Road from 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, and Oslo Road from 43rd
Avenue to 58th Avenue. The other two projects were removed from the Priority Transportation
Capital Improvements Program because the road capacity that those projects would add to the
transportation system is no longer needed to maintain the current Level of Service of E +20. Those
projects and the available peak hour, directional trip capacity of the associated roadways are listed in
Table 6.11. All of the roadways listed in that table currently have sufficient available peak hour,
directional trip capacity to accommodate already approved developments.
Table 6.11: Concurrency Links Report for Removed Priority Transportation Projects
Transportation Project
Description Listed in CIP
Link #
Link Description
Capacity
Total
Demand*
Available*
43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 18th Street,
four lanes (1 mile)
2925N
43`d Avenue, 12`h Street to 16th Street
1,071.00
555.95
515.05
2925S 43`d Avenue, 12`h Street to 16th Street 1,071.00
728.95
342.05
2930N 43`d Avenue, 16`h Street to S.R. 60 1,071.00
665.40
405.60
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
33
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
*Peak hour, directional trips
Needs Assessment
Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs
assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet
proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital
improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000
and may be paid for in phases.
Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2014/15 for conservation &
aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement & corrections, recreation
and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste,
transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with
each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual
department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with
the Public School Facilities Element. Those projects are found in Appendix C. Detailed capital
improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable
Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental
service.
Table 6.12: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County &
2930S
43`d Avenue, 16"' Street to S.R. 60
1,071.00
704.56
366.44
43rd Avenue,l8th Street to 26"' Street,
four lanes
2935N
43`d Avenue, S.R. 60 to 26'11 Street
1,796.00
532.73
1,263.27
2935S 43`d Avenue, S.R. 60 to 26" Street 1,796.00
1 525.31
1,270.69
*Peak hour, directional trips
Needs Assessment
Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs
assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet
proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital
improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000
and may be paid for in phases.
Table 6.12 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2014/15 for conservation &
aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement & corrections, recreation
and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste,
transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with
each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual
department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with
the Public School Facilities Element. Those projects are found in Appendix C. Detailed capital
improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable
Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental
service.
Table 6.12: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County &
Indian River Count School District
Element or Category
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
Conservation & Aquifer
$
$
Recharge
$1,350,000
$75,000
-
$100,000
-
Emergency Services
$
$3,426,177
$2,361,705
$450,000
$3,000,000
-
General Services
$189,508
$60,000
$4,160,000
$60,000
$60,000
Law Enforcement &
$
$
$
Corrections
$558,960
$1,900,000
-
-
-
Recreation & Open
Space
$4,069,300
$2,050,000
$3,485,000
$2,825,000
$2,500,000
Sanitary Sewer &
Potable Water
$6,681,988
$1,077,337
$4,497,450
$5,028,758
$2,913,000
Solid Waste
$9,075,000
$1,830,000
$2,200,000
$6,967,000
$667,802
Stormwater Management
$969,000
$500,000
$950,000
$3,000,000
$5,000,000
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
34
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.12: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County &
Indian River Count School District
Element or Category
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
Transportation
$45,272,376
$29,378,382
$32,750,000
$29,800,000
$49,156,568
Total
$71,592,309
$39,232,424
$48,492,450
$50,780,758
$60,297,370
Public School
Facilities*
$42,851,573
$29,145,119
$10,347,761
$12,310,139
$13,026,495
*The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school
facilities.
Figure 6.18 graphically displays the projected capital improvements expenditures for the county
during the next five fiscal years. As indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the
elements for the five year period is $270,395,311.
Within the first fiscal year, projects are funded from current fund balances as well as anticipated
annual revenues. For the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed"
revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in
years four and five of the CIP are funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned"
revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. In this case, the one
planned revenue source programmed in the CIP is the imposition of an additional six cents of local
option gas tax.
Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems, are provided countywide, but are
not the fiscal responsibility of the County. The County, however, is required by State Statutes to
provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with State
law, the Florida Department of Children and Family Services appoints the management of the
IRCHD, maintains the financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the
county.
In the Future Land Use and Introductory Elements of the county's comprehensive plan, there is an
analysis and description of public schools and health centers. Based on general locational criteria for
public schools and health centers, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in
the county by 2014/15 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated
expansion areas. Therefore, these systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate
infrastructure.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
35
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
$0
Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures
FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12
❑ Conservation & Aquifer Recharge
M Law Enforcement & Corrections
■ Solid Waste
Fiscal Assessment
FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15
19 Emergency Services
0 Recreation & Open Space
Ell Stormwater Management
❑ General Services
■ Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water
11 Transportation
This section examines the county's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6.12, with
the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available
within the existing budget framework utilized by the county to fund the needed improvements at the
time that those improvements will be required. For public school facilities listed in table 6.12, the
School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements. The
School District's adopted "Summary of Capital Improvements Program" (Appendix C) and
"Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix D) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility
of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan.
This assessment process consists of projecting future revenue receipts and comparing those receipts
to anticipated expenditures. With this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and
shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing the needed capital
improvements. The expenditure estimates include the operating costs.
Proiected Expenditures
Table 6.13 shows the county's projected expenditures for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. By
fiscal year 2014/15, the county is projected to have annual expenditures totaling $287,466,627. In FY
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
36
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
2014/15, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Public Safety category. For
the five-year period beginning in fiscal year 2010/11 and ending in fiscal year 2014/15, the county's
expenditures are projected to increase by 29.95%.
Table 6.13: Indian River County Overall General Expenditures Projection Summary
FY
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
General Gov't. Services
16,980,605
17,271,000
21,801,000
18,142,000
18,594,000
Public Safety
72,041,547
74,019,705
71,952,000
76,290,000
75,122,000
Physical Environment
68,145,494
54,803,337
59,966,450
69,014,758
63,562,802
Transportation
57,843,301
42,263,382
45,957,000
43,337,000
63,031,568
Economic Environment
499,847
512,000
525,000
538,000
551,000
Human Services
7,597,176
7,787,000
7,982,000
8,182,000
8,387,000
Culture/Recreation
17,785,732
16,109,000
17,895,000
17,595,000
17,639,000
Debt Service
7,024,509
6,829,093
6,830,373
6,823,033
6,813,257
Other
30,589,833
31,355,000
32,139,000
1 32,942,000
1 33,766,000
TOTAL
278,508,044
250,949,517
265,047,823
1 272,863,791
1 287,466,627
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
Earmarked Projected Expenditures
Table 6.14 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds
for fiscal years 2010/11 through 2014/15. These expenditures include operating expenses and other
expenses for each year.
According to law, all revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure improvements
that benefit the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, the revenue and expenditure amounts
increase and decrease with development. For that reason, projecting capacity charge revenues and
expenditures is difficult. This system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels
of service below county minimums.
Table 6.14: Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste
Fiscal Year
Potable Water & Sanitary Sewer
Solid Waste
2010/11
$27,333,363
$10,713,852
2011/12
$27,333,000
$10,714,000
2012/13
$28,016,000
$10,982,000
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
37
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.14: Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste
Fiscal Year
Potable Water & Sanitary Sewer
Solid Waste
2013/14
$28,716,000
$11,257,000
2014/15
$29,434,000
$11,538,000
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
In FY 2014/15, the projected expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to
be $29,434,000. That is an increase of 7.69% from the 2010/11 projected expenses of $27,333,363.
Table 6..14 shows that, in FY 2014/15, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to
be $11,538,000. That is an increase of 7.69% from the 2010/11 projected figure of $10,713,852.
Operating Cost Proiections
Table 6.15 provides projections of overall operating costs for the county for fiscal years 2010/11
through 2014/15. In fiscal year 2014/15, the county is projected to incur approximately $189,485,892
in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.15, the county's operating costs are
projected to increase 7.46% between 2010/11 and 2014/15.
Table 6.15: Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections
Fiscal Year
Total Operating Costs
2010/11
$176,325,902
2011/12
$230,937,606
2012/13
$71,402,801
2013/14
$152,510,296
2014/15
$189,485,892
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget
Proiected Debt Capacity
Debt Financing, which involves borrowing money using the county's assets as collateral, is one way
that the county has provided for its capital facility needs. The primary rationale for providing capital
facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is
paid for by those who will use the facility.
Table 6.16 provides a summary of the county's estimated ability to raise bond revenue without a
public vote. That table identifies the county's bonding capacity for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table
6.16 indicates, the county's available bonding capacity for a 10 year issue is $160,100,000, while its
bonding capacity for a 30 year issue is $323,100,000.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
38
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.16: Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without A Public Vote
Pledge Sources
Ten Years
(Bond Interest Rate @
2.54%)
Twenty Years
(Bond Interest Rate @
3.80%)
Thirty Years
(Bond Interest Rate @
4.11%
Half Cent Sales Tax
$47,300,000
$80,300,000
$102,800,000
Gas Taxes
$49,800,000
$78,900,000
$97,300,000
Tourist Tax
$9,500,000
$15,000,000
$18,500,000
First Guaranteed
Entitlement
$1,800,000
$2,800,000
$3,500,000
Second Guaranteed
Entitlement
$3,700,000
$5,900,000
$7,300,000
Sub -Total
$112,100,000
$182,900,000
$229,400,000
Possible Pledge Sources
Franchise Fees
$40,100,000
$63,500,000
$78,300,000
Road Impact Fees
$7,900,000
$12,500,000
$15,400,000
Sub -Total
$48,000,000
$76,000,000
$93,700,000
TOTAL
$160,100,000
$258,900,000
$323,100,000
*Rates are comparable term AAA rated municipal bond yields as of 9/21/10.
Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget.
Debt Service Obligations
In table 6.17, the county's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are
summarized. Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the
issuance of bonds. As table 6.17 indicates, the county's major anticipated outstanding debts are for
water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, recreational
revenue bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
39
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.17: Indian River County
Bond Schedule
FY
Ending
Water &
Sewer
Revenue
Refunding
Bonds
Water &
Sewer
Revenue
Refunding
Bonds
Recreational
Revenue
Refunding
Bonds
Environmentally
Sensitive Land
Acquisition
Environmentally
Sensitive Land
Acquisition
Water &
Sewer
Revenue
Refunding
Bonds
Spring
Training
Facility
Revenue
Bonds
1993 A
Series
5.755%
$47,190,000
2009 Series
3.68%
$26,370,000
2003 Series
3.65%
$6,455,000
2001 Series
3.89%
$11,000,000
2006 Series
4.22%
$48,600,000
2005 Series
3.94%
$27,675,000
2001 Series
4.87%
$16,810,000
Interest
$1,668,625
$1,331,610
$135,164
$240,573
$1,838,662
$1,012,650
$642,233
Principal
$1,475,000
$0
$510,000
$745,000
$2,775,000
$1,395,000
$585,000
Total
$3,143,625
$1,331,610
$645,164
$985,573
$4,613,662
$2,407,650
$1,227,233
2010
Balance
$1,555,000
$26,370,000
$3,175,000
$5,210,000
$38,270,000
$21,925,000
$12,310,000
Interest
$1,587,500
$1,268,200
$119,864
$213,007
$1,727,663
$970,800
$618,833
Principal
$1,555,000
$0
$520,000
$780,000
$2,885,000
$1,435,000
$605,000
Total
$3,142,500
$1,268,200
$639,864
$993,007
$4,612,663
$2,405,800
$1,223,833
2011
Balance
$0
$26,370,000
$2,655,000
$4,430,000
$35,385,000
$20,490,000
$11,705,000
Interest
$1,268,200
$102,964
$183,368
$1,612,262
$925,250
$593,423
Principal
$1,610,000
$535,000
$810,000
$3,000,000
$1,480,000
$630,000
Total
$2,878,200
$637,964
$993,368
$4,612,262
$2,405,250
$1,223,423
2012
Balance
$24,760,000
$2,120,000
$3,620,000
$32,385,000
$19,010,000
$11,075,000
Interest
$1,203,800
$83,169
$151,777
$1,492,263
$877,150
$566,333
Principal
$1,675,000
$555,000
$845,000
$3,120,000
$1,530,000
$655,000
Total
$2,878,800
$638,169
$996,777
$4,612,263
$2,407,150
$1,221,333
2013
Balance
$23,085,000
$1,565,000
$2,775,000
$29,265,000
$17,480,000
$10,420,000
Interest
$1,136,800
$62,356
$117,978
$1,367,462
$800,650
$537,513
Principal
$1,745,000
$580,000
$885,000
$3,255,000
$1,605,000
$685,000
Total
$2,881,800
$642,356
$1,002,978
$4,622,462
$2,405,650
$1,222,513
2014
Balance
$21,340,000
$985,000
$1,890,000
$26,010,000
$15,875,000
$9,735,000
Interest
$1,067,000
$39,881
$80,807
$1,204,713
$736,450
$501,550
Principal
$1,815,000
$600,000
$925,000
$3,390,000
$1,670,000
$725,000
Total
$2,882,000
$639,881
$1,005,807
$4,594,713
$2,406,450
$1,226,550
2015
Balance
$19,525,000
$385,000
$965,000
$22,620,000
$14,205,000
$9,010,000
Interest
$976,250
$15,881
$41,495
$1,035,212
$652,950
$463,488
Principal
$1,905,000
$385,000
$965,000
$3,545,000
$1,750,000
$760,000
Total
$2,881,250
$400,881
$1,006,495
$4,580,212
$2,402,950
$1,223,488
2016
Balance
$17,620,000
$0
$0
$19,075,000
$12,455,000
$8,250,000
2017
Interest
$881,000
$893,413
$565,450
$423,588
Principal
$2,000,000
$3,705,000
$1,840,000
$795,000
Total
$2,881,000
$4,598,413
$2,405,450
$1,218,588
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
40
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
41
Balance
$15,620,000
$15,370,000
$10,615,000
$7,455,000
Interest
$781,000
$745,212
$473,450
$381,850
Principal
$2,100,000
$3,890,000
$1,930,000
$840,000
Total
$2,881,000
$4,635,212
$2,403,450
$1,221,850
2018
Balance
$13,520,000
$11,480,000
$8,685,000
$6,615,000
Interest
$676,000
$550,713
$376,950
$337,750
Principal
$2,205,000
$4,085,000
$2,025,000
$890,000
Total
$2,881,000
$4,635,713
$2,401,950
$1,227,750
2019
Balance
$11,315,000
$7,395,000
$6,660,000
$5,725,000
Interest
$565,750
$346,462
$275,700
$291,025
Principal
$2,315,000
$4,290,000
$2,130,000
$930,000
Total
$2,880,750
$4,636,462
$2,405,700
$1,221,025
2020
Balance
$9,000,000
$3,105,000
$4,530,000
$4,795,000
Interest
$450,000
$131,963
$186,750
$242,200
Principal
$2,430,000
$3,105,000
$2,220,000
$980,000
Total
$2,880,000
$3,236,963
$2,406,750
$1,222,200
2021
Balance
$6,570,000
$0
$2,310,000
$3,815,000
Interest
$328,500
$92,400
$190,750
Principal
$2,550,000
$2,310,000
$305,000
Total
$2,878,500
$2,402,400
$495,750
2022
Balance
$4,020,000
$0
$3,510,000
Interest
$201,000
$175,500
Principal
$2,680,000
$320,000
Total
$2,881,000
$495,500
2023
Balance
$1,340,000
$3,190,000
Interest
$67,000
$159,500
Principal
$1,340,000
$340,000
Total
$1,407,000
$499,500
2024
Balance
$0
$2,850,000
Interest
$142,500
Principal
$355,000
Total
$497,500
2025
Balance
$2,495,000
Interest
$124,750
Principal
$375,000
Total
$499,750
2026
Balance
$2,120,000
Interest
$106,000
Principal
$390,000
Total
$496,000
2027
Balance
$1,730,000
2028
Interest
$86,500
Principal
$410,000
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
41
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Fiscal Assessment Summary
This section provides an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital
improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 2010/11 and ending in FY 2014/15.
While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for
each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7
provides general revenue projections for the county through fiscal year 2014/15. As shown in Table
6.7, the County will generate $1,354,835,802 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and
internal funds from fiscal year 2010/11 to fiscal year 2014/15. Sources of these funds include sales
taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. Portions of the money needed for the
capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from the $1,354,835,802.
Overall, the county will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital
improvements program. For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project
list, the total estimated cost is $204,821,475 for the next five fiscal years. This is 15.12% of the
overall general fund revenues for the same time period.
Concurrency Management Plan
To ensure that level -of -service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place
that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on
applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. That system will set the
parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level -of -service standards.
While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific
application of this system is through the county's land development regulations. As per state
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
42
Total $496,500
Balance $1,320,000
Interest $66,000
Principal $430,000
Total $496,000
2029
Balance $890,000
Interest $44,500
Principal $455,000
Total $499,500
2030
Balance $435,000
Interest $21,750
Principal $435,000
Total $456,750
2031
Balance $o
Fiscal Assessment Summary
This section provides an analysis of the county's revenues and expenditures for its capital
improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 2010/11 and ending in FY 2014/15.
While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for
each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7
provides general revenue projections for the county through fiscal year 2014/15. As shown in Table
6.7, the County will generate $1,354,835,802 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and
internal funds from fiscal year 2010/11 to fiscal year 2014/15. Sources of these funds include sales
taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. Portions of the money needed for the
capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from the $1,354,835,802.
Overall, the county will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital
improvements program. For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project
list, the total estimated cost is $204,821,475 for the next five fiscal years. This is 15.12% of the
overall general fund revenues for the same time period.
Concurrency Management Plan
To ensure that level -of -service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place
that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on
applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. That system will set the
parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level -of -service standards.
While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific
application of this system is through the county's land development regulations. As per state
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
42
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
requirements, these regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and
establish its administrative requirements.
The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing
the county's level -of -service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must
apply to all development activity in the county. The system must then identify the applicable
standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring
facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered
available.
Project Applicability
All development orders issued by the county must comply with the concurrency management plan
and meet level -of -service standards. Development orders are county approvals for construction
and/or land development activity. Specifically, development orders consist of the following:
comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals,
development of regional impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and
building permit approvals for single-family homes located in subdivisions which were approved after
February 13, 1990, the original adoption date of the county's comprehensive plan.
According to Section 163.3180(6), F.S., the impact from the construction of a single family home on
an existing lot may constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities. State law allows such de
minimus projects to be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Indian River County applies the
single family de minimus allowance to single family building permits in subdivisions platted before
February 13, 1990.
Service Standards
Level -of -service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the
following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation,
public schools, and transportation. These are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive
plan elements.
For each facility, level -of -service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and
the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility.
Table 6.18 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility. These measures
are addressed in detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan
Elements.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
43
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.18: Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities
Public Facility Category
Specific Facility
Capacity Measure
Demand Measure
Geographic Scope
Transportation
Roadway
Volume of cars
Peak Season/Peak
Affected Roadways
accommodated over time
Direction/Peak Hour Trips
Sanitary Sewer
Treatment Plant
design Capacity
Generation Rate (GPD)
Service Area
(GPD)Treatment
Potable Water
Treatment Plant
Treatment Design Capacity
Generation Rate (GPD)
Service Area
(GPD)
Solid Waste
Landfill
Volume in active cell (cubic
Generation Rate (tons per
Entire County
yards)
capita per year)
Recreation
Parks
Acres of park land
Acres of parks per
Entire County
thousand population
Stormwater Management
Drainage
Volume of water
Volume of stormwater
Basin
conveyances
outfalling for design storm
Education*
Public Schools (K-
Number of Children
Enrolled Students/ Future
Service Area
12)
accommodated over time
Student Generation
*Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County School District
Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project's impact
area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available,
the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then
is to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by
project basis.
Table 6.18 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed
project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; this is the
geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected
roadways are those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. Regardless of size, all projects impact
the roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the
project are usually impacted. For concurrency purposes, two lane roadways which are assigned 8 or
more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips and four or more lane roadways that are
assigned 15 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips are considered impacted
roadways.
For transportation concurrency related facilities, level -of -service standards are applied to all impacted
roadways. Those level -of -service standards range from A to F and are associated with peak
hour/peak season/peak direction trips.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Demand
Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system. Essentially, demand is a
measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level -of -service
for the facility.
As depicted in Table 6.18, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category.
While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users,
estimation of total demand is more complex. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be
divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for
purposes of concurrency management.
Existing Demand
Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of
peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled
students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in
gallons per day. These figures are included within applicable plan elements.
Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to
capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over
capacity.
Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line,
existing demand increases. These increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use
measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are
examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels
for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing
committed demand have come on-line.
Committed Demand
Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved
capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the committed demand
for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. This estimate of unused
capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects.
Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been
reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific
facilities that will be impacted by these projects with reserved capacities must be determined; these
facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances,
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
45
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand
will be determined.
Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility
demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip rate to the size of the
project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent
residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan
Element.
Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For
example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each major roadway,
each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill.
Also, like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are
completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are
approved and old development orders are terminated.
Projected Demand
The third type of demand is projected demand. This consists of two types. One is non-
committed/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions platted after February 13,
1990, while the other is new project demand.
Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand relates to the facility impacts
associated with construction on single-family lots in subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990 and
construction on single-family unplatted lots and acreage. Since this type of construction will impact
facilities, the demand anticipated from this type of activity must be considered in facility expansion
plans. For this reason, it is necessary to maintain an accurate inventory of unbuilt, platted lots and
consider the impacts of construction on these lots.
The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand
estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for
each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued. Upon
issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as
committed demand.
Availability of Capacity
Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by
facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing
roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
46
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
both existing, in -the -ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are
programmed but not yet existing.
According to Chapter 9J-5.0055(3), Minimum Requirements For Concurrency, Florida
Administrative Code, the capacity of existing, in -the -ground facilities will be considered in all cases.
Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when
the following conditions are met:
➢ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities:
1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities
and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or
2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services
are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to Section 163.3220,
F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in
place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(a), F.S.]
➢ For parks and recreation facilities:
At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are in place or under actual construction; or
2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the
necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by
the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed;
and
a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the
necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are
in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a
certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities
and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the
necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or
under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate
of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
47
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities
and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant
to Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued
pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not
more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional
equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(b), F.S.]
➢ Transportation supply (capacity). Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by
segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall
be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity
tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant
to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is:
1. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or
2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and
if:
a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and
services are in place or under construction; or
b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the facility
expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county's adopted
five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled to be in place or under
actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project's first
building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements
may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of
the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order
to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements
Element must include the following policies:
i. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the
estimated date of project completion.
ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay
construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed
to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the
five-year schedule of capital improvements (for Indian River County, this
is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or
3. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is
issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
48
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the
issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent; or
4. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is
issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, pursuant to
Section 163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter
380, F.S., to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after
issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(c), F. S.]
5. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the subject
of a proportionate fair -share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase
reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or
parties to the proportionate fair share agreement.
➢ For school facilities:
A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for
the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas as defined
in Section 163.3180(13)(c), F.S.
Regulation
No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with
existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level
established in this plan. Level -of -service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each
project for which development order approval is required.
Monitoring System
To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of
available capacity for each public facility subject to level -of -service requirements. By maintaining an
accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from
development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the
project can be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of
available capacity for each facility.
With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management
plan is maintained by the county's planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District
initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
49
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
public schools. Using a network computer system and data base management software, records were
developed and are maintained for each specific facility.
Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each
applicable facility are maintained in data base files established for each public facility category.
Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of
capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity
determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to
modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed.
Table 6.19 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system data base file for each public
facility category. This table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of
total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this
concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand.
Table 6.19: Monitoring System Design
Public
Specific
Total Capacity
Existing Demand
Committed Demand
Available Capacity
Facility
Facilities
Category
Peak season/ peak
Annual count (average)
Volume estimated from
(Total Capacity) - (Existing
Traffic
Roadways
direction/ peak hour
(peak season/peak
approved Development
Demand) - (Committed
(LOS D)
direction/peak hour)
Orders (DO)
Demand)
Sanitary
Treatment
Volume estimated from
(Total Capacity) - (Existing
Sewer
Plants
Design flows
Existing flows
approved DO's
Demand) - (Committed
Demand)
Treatment
Volume estimated from
(Total Capacity) - (Existing
Potable Water
Plants
Design flows
Existing flows
approved DO's
Demand) - (Committed
Demand)
Active cell design
Volume estimated from
(Total Capacity) - (Existing
Solid Waste
Landfill
capacity
Active cell volume used
approved DO's
Demand) - (Committed
Demand)
(Acres per thousand
(Acres per thousandpopulation)
(Total Capacity) - (Existing
Recreation
Parks
Park Acreage
population) X (existing
X (projected
population for approved
Demand) - (Committed
population)
DO's)
Demand)
Drainage
Volume of stormwater
(Total Capacity) - (Existing
Drainage
Volume
Existing flows
allowed to outfall for
Demand) - (Committed
conveyances
approved DO's
Demand)
Public
Permanent Student
Annual Enrollment
Students estimated from
(Total Capacity) - (Existing
Education
Schools(K-
Stations ( FISH)
() Count FTE
approved residential
Demand) - (Committed
12)
Development Orders)
Demand)
To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.20 will be necessary.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
50
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.20: Monitoring System Tasks
Action
Responsible Department
Timing
Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand
Engineering
Annually
Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes
MPO
Annually
Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant
Utilities
Annually
Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used
Utilities
Annually
Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand
Planning
Annually
Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances
Engineering
Annually
Enter data received from other departments into computer
Planning
Ongoing
Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand
School District
Annually
Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO
Planning
Ongoing
Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand
estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for
committed demand once existing demand is updated
Planning
Ongoing
Applicability
The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level -of -
service measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore
capital improvements programming. By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available
capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By
incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital
budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
51
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Goal, Objectives and Policies
Goal
It is the goal of Indian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of
sound fiscal decision making.
Objectives and Policies
Obiective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities
By 2015, the county will have completed those capital improvements schedule projects that replace
obsolete or worn-out facilities, eliminate existing deficiencies or accommodate desired future growth.
Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to
Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and
future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan
is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standards are achieved and maintained.
Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall undertake only those capital improvements
included within this element's adopted capital improvements program. Pursuant to Section
163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital Improvements Element will be reviewed every year. Consistent
with Section 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code, if any facility identified in the Schedule of
Capital Improvements is delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital
improvements program, and this delay, defer, or elimination will cause the level -of -service to
deteriorate below the adopted minimum level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive
plan amendment will be required to adjust the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update
of the capital improvement element shall be done with a single public hearing before the Board of
County Commissioners and a copy of the ordinance amending the Capital Improvements Element
shall be transmitted to DCA.
Policy 1.3: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on
following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance.
➢ Preservation of the health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards;
➢ Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments;
➢ Elimination of existing deficiencies;
➢ Maintenance of adopted level -of -service standards;
➢ Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development;
➢ Protection of prior infrastructure investments;
➢ Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies;
➢ Accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility demands;
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
52
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
➢ Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide
public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction;
➢ Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service
areas;
➢ Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location;
➢ Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements;
➢ Reduction of operating costs;
➢ Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters.
Policy 1.4: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid
Waste sub -elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements,
capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived
from the applicable systems.
Policy 1.5: The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation,
Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements
of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road
improvement projects required to meet the adopted level -of -service standards unless the applicable
projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county's Schedule of
Capital Improvements.
Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of
infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and
maximize the life of the infrastructure.
Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the
ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%.
Policy 1.9: The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that
exceeds $100,000.
Polices: The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures,
including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities, and to
construct new facilities.
Policy 1.11: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county
department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital
improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department's
capital improvements.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
53
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Polices The county hereby adopts the 2010 — 2011 through 2014 - 2015 Indian River County
School District Five -Year Facilities Work Plan. The Indian River County School District Five -Year
Facilities Work Plan will be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public
school facility needs of the county. This will ensure that the Indian River County School District
Five -Year Facilities Work Plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standard
for public schools is achieved and maintained.
Obiective 2: Development in Coastal High Hazard Areas
Through 2030, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or
intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map.
Policy 2.1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation
zones for a category one hurricane.
Policy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard
area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future Land Use Map.
Policy 2.3: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only
to maintain the adopted level -of -service standards.
Policy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard
area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level -of -service standards.
Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high
hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity
charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions.
Policy 2.6: The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban
development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource
restoration, or similar projects may be constructed.
Obiective 3: Maintenance of Established Level -of -Service Standards
Through 2030, adopted levels -of -service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities.
Policy 3.1: The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this
element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910,
Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan's concurrency management system. In
accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will
not approve any development project where the impacts of such a project would lower the existing
level -of -service on any facility below that facility's adopted minimum level -of -service standard.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
54
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Polio The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection
matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub -Elements.
Polio The county shall, concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the
infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels -of -service identified in the various elements of the
Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable
regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the
applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such
improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval.
Policy 3.4: The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability of facilities to
maintain adopted level -of -service standards.
Policy 3.5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level -of -service standards for public
facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below:
➢ Stormwater Management:
The county hereby adopts the following level -of -service standard for all new drainage systems within
the unincorporated county:
➢ New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall
construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour
design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall
curves.
➢ Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre -development
runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not
exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post
development discharge may not exceed pre -development discharge.
By 2015, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level -of -service
standards:
➢ Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during
resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm
event on local streets.
➢ The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a
10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads.
➢ All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standards:
By 2007 5-Year/24 Hour Storm Event
By 2010 10-Year/24 Hour Storm Event
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
55
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
The county hereby adopts the following water quality level -of -service standard:
➢ As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite
discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the
Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an
outstanding Florida water, as required by state law.
➢ Potable Water
The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall
be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a
development:
➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential
unit.
➢ Solid Waste
The following level -of -service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be
used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a
development:
➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year.
➢ Sanitary Sewer
The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall
be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a
development:
➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential
unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25.
➢ Recreation & Open Space
The county adopts the following recreation level -of -service standard:
➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 6.61 recreation acres/ 1,000 permanent plus
weighted peak seasonal population.
➢ Transportation
The county adopts traffic circulation level -of -service standards as follows:
➢ Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all
TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
56
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus
20%.
• 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60
• 43rd Ave — Oslo Road to 16th Street
For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas,
and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas.
Polio The county hereby adopts level -of -service standards for selected public facilities as
follows:
➢ Correctional Facilities
The county adopts the following correctional facilities level -of -service standard:
➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 4.5 beds/1,000 permanent plus weighted
peak seasonal population
➢ Fire/EMS
The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level -of -service standard:
➢ County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level -of -service standard of .089
Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Law Enforcement
The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level -of -service standard:
➢ Unincorporated County level -of -service standard of 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent
plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ Libraries
The county adopts the following Libraries level -of -service standards:
➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 580 building square feet per 1,000
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 3,200 library material items per 1,000
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus
weighted peak seasonal population
➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
57
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
➢ Public Buildings
The county adopts the following Public Buildings level -of -service standard:
➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 1.99 building square feet per capita for
permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population.
➢ Schools
The county adopts the following Schools level -of -service standard:
Schools (School Service Areas):
➢ 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school
type (elementary, middle, and high).
➢ Transit
The County adopts the following transit level -of -service standard:
➢ One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes.
Objective 4: Future Development's Share of Capital Costs
Through 2030, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain
adopted level -of -service standards.
Police: The county shall use impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications
and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs
while maintaining adopted level -of -service standards.
Police: The county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital
improvement projects.
Obiective 5: Local Government's Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities
Through 2030, the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and
facilities.
Policy 5.1: The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are
consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element.
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
58
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all
applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve
developments in the following order of priority:
➢ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels
➢ Affordable housing projects
➢ New development orders permitting redevelopment
➢ New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the
infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement
➢ New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation
Policy 5.3: The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing
Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 of the Potable Water Sub -Element and Policy 5.8 of
the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private
entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general
benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services:
➢ Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi -use
facilities;
➢ More efficient land use patterns and phasing;
➢ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures;
➢ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least -cost
manner;
➢ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures.
Policy 5.5: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer,
Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees,
capacity charges, and other appropriate sources.
Policy 5.6: The county shall finance the capital cost of non -enterprise fund supported public facilities
(e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees,
capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources.
Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding
required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds,
impact fees, capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources.
Policy 5.8: Developments, which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be
financed by county debt, shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the
county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non -debt revenue.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
59
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by
ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment
relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of
facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, or the date of
construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital
Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the
level -of -service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level -of -service standard
for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment.
Policy 5.10: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements
of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be
those which are subject to one of the following:
➢ Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated
within or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements;
➢ Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent
availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project. Such modification
shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served
by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule; or
➢ Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level -of -service for public
facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
60
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring
Implementation
An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's
policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results.
For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of
these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For
each policy in this element, table 6.21 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for
taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure.
To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken.
These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption of land development
regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of
studies and evaluation and monitoring reports.
Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of
Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.20, the planning
department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their
responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be
included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and
assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities.
As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management
Plan, which ensures the maintenance of the adopted level -of -service standards. Through the
Concurrency Management Plan, the county will measure facility capacity, assess development
demand, and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level -of -service
standards are maintained.
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
61
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.21: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix
Policy
Type of Action
Responsibility
Timing
Capital Expenditure
1.1
Maintain the CIP
OMB/PD
2010-2014
No
1.2
Follow the CIP
PD
2010-2014
No
1.3
Prioritize capital improvement projects
OMB/PD/SD
Ongoing
No
1.4
Implement recommendations
Appropriate County
2010-2014
Yes
Departments/SD
1.5
Prioritize and implement programs
Appropriate County
2010-2014
Yes
Departments/SD
1.6
Maintain previous commitments
BCC/PWD/SD
Ongoing
No
1.7
Replacement and renewal of infrastructure
Appropriate County
Departments/SD
Ongoing
No
1.8
Budget Management
OMB/SD
Ongoing
No
1.9
Define capital improvement
PD/OMB
Ongoing
No
1.10
Capital Budget Management
OMB/SD
Ongoing
No
1.11
Capital Improvements Management
OMB/SD
Ongoing
No
2.1
Define costal high hazard area
DCA
Ongoing
No
2'2
density and intensity levels of current FLU
PD
Ongoing
No
Maintain
Map
2.3
Budget management
Appropriate County
Ongoing
Yes
Departments
2.4
Maintain LOS standards
Appropriate County
Ongoing
Yes
Departments
2.5
Funding mechanisms
BCC/Private Developers
Ongoing
No
2.6
Infrastructure replacement strategy
Appropriate County
Ongoing
No
Departments
3.1
Maintain concurrency management system
PD
Ongoing
No
3.2
Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub-
Appropriate County
Ongoing
No
Elements
Departments
3.3
Maintain adopted LOS standards
PD
Ongoing
No
3.4
Land use decisions
BCC
Ongoing
No
3.5
Adopt LOS standards
BCC/SD/Appropriate
County Departments
Ongoing
No
4.1
Impose regulations
Appropriate County
Ongoing
Yes
Departments
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
62
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Table 6.21: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix
Policy
Type of Action
Responsibility
Timing
Capital Expenditure
4.2
Conduct research
OMB/PD
Ongoing
No
4.3
Work with municipalities
BCC/SD/Other Local
Ongoing
No
Governments in IRC
5 1
Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can
BCC
Ongoing
No
support land use change
5.2
Prioritize capital improvements
BCC/SD/Appropriate
Ongoing
No
County Departments
5.3
Extension of facilities and services
BCC/Appropriate County
Ongoing
No
Departments
Appropriate County
5.4
Create an efficient capital improvements schedule
Departments/Other
Ongoing
No
Government Agencies
5.5
Utilize enterprise funds
OMB
Ongoing
No
5.6
Finance non -enterprise fund supported projects
OMB
Ongoing
No
5.7
Fund the construction of public facilities
OMB/SD
Ongoing
Yes
5.8
Permitting Requirements
BCC/Appropriate County
Ongoing
No
Departments
5.9
Amending the Schedule of Capital Improvements
BCC/OMB/PD/SD
Ongoing
No
5.10
Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements
BCC/SD/Appropriate
2014
No
S 1 1
Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements
BCC/PWD/MPO
Ongoing
No
Schedule
BCC = Board of County Commissioners DCA = Department of Community Affairs
FDOT = Florida Department of Transportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization
OMB = Office of Management and Budget PD = Planning Department
PWD = Public Works Department SD = School District
Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures
To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a
mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by
the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as
possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks
used as a basis to evaluate the plan.
Table 6.22 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies
the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River County
63
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of
the level -of -service standards, adopting a capacity monitoring system and others. Besides the
measures, table 6.22 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives.
The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital
Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding
facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis.
As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually
monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level -of -service standards will be maintained.
Table 6.22: Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix
objcctivc
Measure
Timeframc
1
Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out facilities
2015
2
Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area
2030
3
Level -of -service provided for county services
2030
4
Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations
2030
5
Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements
2030
While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements
Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan
will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be
used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or
expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as
part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital
Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the
plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan
element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element.
As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the
Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These
procedures are currently being used to prepare the formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will
be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Included in those procedures
are the format requirements listed in 9J-5.005-(1)(a)(e), F.A.C.
The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in
achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions
and measures to be used in the review of the element. Each element contains an Implementation and
Community Development Department Indian River County
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
64
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current
Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports.
In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency
management system which is designed to ensure that approved level -of -service standards are
maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation
of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated
regulations, which will result in plan amendments.
The formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report required by law is currently providing and in subsequent
versions will provide a complete review of the plan and be conducted in compliance with the public
participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan.
As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data is currently being updated and will be
updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process is and will also be used to
determine whether the objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and
evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only provides a means of determining the degree
of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a mechanism for evaluating needed changes
to the plan element.
Community Development Department Indian River County 65
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX A: FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Conservation and Aquifer Recharge
FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14
Indian River
Coun Five
Year Schedule
of Improvements
FY 2014/15
$1,525,000
Total
Revenue Source
Archie Smith Fish House
$
45,000
$
$
$ -
$
$
Revenue
A
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
$
Total Im
Env. Land Bonds
$
300,000
$ -
$
$ -
$
$
300,000
Park Impact Fees
$
25,000
$ 75,000
$
$ -
$ -
$
100,000
Grant
$
1,025,000
$ -
$
$ 100,000
$ -
$
1,125,000
Total Revenue
$
1,350 000
$ 75,000
$
- $ 100,000
$ -
$
1525,000
Expenditures
FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
$1,525,000
Total
Revenue Source
Archie Smith Fish House
$
45,000
$
$
$ -
$
$
45,000
Env. Land Bonds
South Prong Preserve
$
25,000
$
$
$
$
$
25,000
Env. Land Bonds
NAWCA Grant - Pressley Conserv. Easement
$
25,000
$
$
$
$
$
25,000
Env. Land Bonds
NAWCA Grant - Pressley Conserv. Easement
$
1,000,000
$
$
$
$
$
1,000,000
Grant
NSCA Addition Fencing
$
50,000
$
$
$ -
$
$
50,000
Env. Land Bonds
CFHP Cypress Cottage Restoration
$
25,000
$
$
$
$
$
25,000
Env. Land Bonds
Ansin Tract Boardwalk/Pier
$
30,000
$
$
$
$
$
30,000
Env. Land Bonds
Cypress Bend Community Preserve
$
25,000
$
$
$
$
$
25,000
Env. Land Bonds
ORCA South Link Pavilion
$
25,000
$
$
$ -
$
$
25,000
Env. Land Bonds
ORCA Diamond Tract Boardwalk/Pier
$
50,000
$
$
$
$
$
50,000
Env. Land Bonds
Flinn Tract - Access
$
25,000
$ 75,000
$
$
$
$
100,000
Park Impact Fees
Flinn Tract - Access
$
25,000
$ -
$
$ 100,000
$
$
125,000
Grant
Total Expenditures
$
1,350,000
$ 75,000
S -
$ 100,000
$ -
$
1,525,000
Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue
FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Total Revenue
$1,350,000 $75,000 $0 $100,000
$0
$1,525,000
Total Expenditures
$1,350,000 $75,000 $0 $100,000
$0
$1,525,000
Annual Balance
$0 $0 $0 $0
$0
$0
Services
I Revenue Sources I FY 2010/11 1 FY 2011/12 1 FY 2012/13 1 FY 2013/14 1 FY 2014/15 1 Total I
Community Development Department Indian River County 66
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Emergency Services Dist. $ 1,226,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 800,000 $ $ 4
Optional Sales Tax $ 2,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 2
Impact Fees $ $ - $ - $ 2,200,000 $ $ 2
Total Revenue $ 3,426,177 $ 2,361,705 $ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ $ 9
Expenditures
FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
FY 2010/11
$ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ $9,237,882
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
Annual Balance $0 $0
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Revenue Source
Total
Revenue Source
Emergency Svcs. Station 9 - Replace
$
88,332
$
-
$ -
$
-
$ -
$
88,332
Emergency Services Dist.
Emergency Svcs. Station 13 - Addition
$
1,137,845
$
1,486,705
$
$
$ -
$
$
2,624,550
Emergency Services Dist.
800 MHz Radio Expansion
$
2,200,000
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
2,200,000
Optional Sales Tax
Emergency Svcs. Station 14 - Addition
$
-
$
-
$
$
2,200,000
$
$
2,200,000
Impact Fees
Two Med Units and One Fire Engine
$
$
875,000
$
$
$
$
875,000
Emergency Services Dist.
Two Med Units
$
$
-
$ 450,000
$
$
$
450,000
Emergency Services Dist.
One Quiint (Fire Apparatus)
$
-
$
-
$ -
$
800,000
$
$
800,000
Emergency Services Dist.
Total Expenditures
$
3,426,177
$
2,361,705
$ 450,000
$
3,000,000
$
$
9,237,882
Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Total Revenue $ 3,426,177 $ 2,361,705
$ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ $9,237,882
Total Expenditures $ 3,426,177 $ 2,361,705
$ 450,000 $ 3,000,000 $ $ 9,237,882
Annual Balance $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 1 FY 2012/13 1 FY 2013/14 1 FY 2014/15 Total
Optional Sales Tax $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 3,910,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,279,508
Court Facility Surcharge $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000
Total Revenue $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 4,160,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,529,508
Ex enditures
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Revenue Source
Expansion of Fiber Optic Network
$ 189,508
$ 60,000
$
60,000
$ 60,000
$ 60,000
$
429,508
Optional Sales Tax
New Courtroom Facilities
$ -
$
$
1,850,000
$ -
$ -
$
1,850,000
Optional Sales Tax
New Courtroom Facilities
$ -
$
$
250,000
$
$
$
250,000
Court Facility Surcharge
Displaced Courtroom
$ -
$ -
$
2,000,000
$ -
$
$
2,000,000
Optional Sales Tax
Total Expenditures
$ 189,508
$ 60,000
1 $
4,160,000
$ 60,000
$ 60,000
$
4,529,508
Comparison of Ex enditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 1 FY 2012/13 1 FY 2013/14 1 FY 2014/15 Total
Community Development Department Indian River County 67
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Total Revenue $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 4,160,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,529,508
Total Expenditures $ 189,508 $ 60,000 $ 4,160,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 4,529,508
Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
T n— Fnfnrrvmvnt
Expenditures
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
Revenue
FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15
Total
Impact Fees
$ - $ 1,200,000 $ $ - $
$1,200,000
Optional Sales Tax
$ 558,960 $ 700,000 $ $ $
$1,258,960
Total Revenue
$ 558,960 $ 1,900,000 $ $ $
$2,458,960
Expenditures
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Revenue Source
Evidence Addition
$ 558,960
$ 700,000
$
$ -
$
$ 1,258,960
Optional Sales Tax
Evidence Addition
$ -
$ 1,200,000
$
$
$
$ 1,200,000
Impact Fees
Total Expenditures
$ 558,960
$ 1,900,000
$
$ -
$
$ 2,458,960
$
Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue
FY 2010/11 _
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Total Revenue
$ 558,960
$ 1,900,000
$
$
$ 2,458,960
Total Expenditures
$ 558,960
$ 1,900,000
$ -
$
$ 2,458,960
Annual Balance
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Parks and Recreation
Revenue ■ IL
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
FBIP
$
200,000
$
$
-
$ -
$
$
200,000
Grant
$
-
$
$
80,000
$
$
$
80,000
Optional Sales Tax
$
1,883,545
$ -
$
1,400,000
$
$
$
3,283,545
Impact Fees
$
1,985,755
$ 2,050,000
$
2,005,000
$ 2,825,000
$ 2,500,000
$
11,365,755
Total Revenue
$
4,069,300
$ 2,050,000
$
3,485,000
$ 2,825,000
$ 2,500,000
$
14,929,300
Community Development Department Indian River County 68
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Expenditures
FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 1 FY 2012/13 1 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15
FY 2010/11
Total Revenue
FY 2011/12
$14,929,300
FY 2012/13
$14,929,300
FY 2013/14
$0 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0
FY 2014/15
Cash Forward
Total
Revenue Source
Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking
$
200,000
$
$
$
$
$
-
$
1,200,000
$
200,000
FBIP
Oslo Boat Ramp and Parking
$
298,643
$
10,900,000
$
$
$
$ -
$
285,000
$
298,643
Impact Fees
S. County Regional Park improvements
$
81,819
$
200,000
$
$
$
-
$
-
$
81,819
Impact Fees
South County Recreation Multi Purpose Facility
$
1,843,545
$
2,285,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,843,545
Optional Sales Tax
South County Recreation Multi Purpose Facility
$
-
$
$
$
1,500,000
$
$
1,500,000
Impact Fees
Fairgrounds Building Enclosure
$
$
$
630,000
$
-
$
$
630,000
Impact Fees
State Road 510 Fishing Pier
$
$
$
1,400,000
$
-
$
$
1,400,000
Optional Sales Tax
Land for Future Parks
$
1,575,000
$
1,575,000
$
1,175,000
$
1,175,000
$
$
5,500,000
Impact Fees
West County Regional Park
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
2,000,000
$
2,000,000
Impact Fees
North County Regional Park Restroom
$
-
$
150,000
$
-
$
$
-
$
150,000
Impact Fees
Gifford Park Restroom/Concession Bldg
$
-
$
-
$
200,000
$
-
$
$
200,000
Impact Fees
16th Street Ballfields Restroom
$
-
$
125,000
$
-
$
$
$
125,000
Impact Fees
Round Island Riverside R 1 Boardwalk
$
-
$
-
$
80,000
$
$
$
80,000
Grant
North County Regional Park Lazy River
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
500,000
$
500,000
Impact Fees
Kiwanis Hobart Park Restroom
$
-
$
$
$
150,000
$
-
$
150,000
Impact Fees
Fairgrounds Campground
$
30,293
$
200,000
$
$
-
$
$
230,293
Impact Fees
Fairgrounds Campground
$
40,000
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
40,000
Optional Sales Tax
Total Expenditures
$
4,069,300
1 $
2,050,000
$
3,485,000
$
2,825,000
$
2,500,000
$
14,929,300
Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue
FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 1 FY 2012/13 1 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15
Total
Total Revenue
$ 4,069,300 $ 2,050,000 $ 3,485,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000
$ 4,069,300 $ 2,050,000 $ 3,485,000 $ 2,825,000 $ 2,500,000
$14,929,300
Total Expenditures
$14,929,300
Annual Balance
$0 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0
$0
Sewer and Potable Water
Revenue
IL I
FY 2010/11 1
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total ]t_
Cash Forward
$
8,528,533
$ -
$
-
$ -
$
-
$
8,528,533
Impact Fees
$
1,200,000
$ 1,600,000
$
2,000,000
$ 2,600,000
$
3,500,000
$
10,900,000
User Fees
$
-
$ -
$
285,000
$ -
$
285,000
$
570,000
Grant Funding
$
200,000
$ -
$
-
$ -
$
-
$
200,000
Total Revenue
$
9,928,533
$ 1,600,000
$
2,285,000
$ 2,600,000
$
3,785,000
$
20,198,533
Community Development Department Indian River County 69
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital improvements Element
Expenditures MENEw
FY 2010/11 =dL
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Revenue Source
Misc Water Improvements
$
250,000
$
250,000
$
250,000
$
250,000
$
250,000
$
1,250,000
Impact Fees
Misc Sewer Improvements
$
175,000
$
175,000
$
175,000
$
175,000
$
175,000
$
875,000
Impact Fees
77th West of Kings (Tuscans Lakes)
$
112,237
$
112,237
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
224,474
Impact Fees
12WM 17th St. SW from 27th Av to 43rd Av
$
-
$
-
$
$
-
$
610,000
$
610,000
Impact Fees
Design FM and WM on 4th St from 82nd to 98th
Ave and on 98th from 4th to 8th
$
-
$
$
$
-
$
100,000
$
100,000
Impact Fees
Convert North County Brine Line to Reuse Main
$
85,000
$
$
$
-
$
-
$
85,000
Impact Fees
12" WM on 27th Ave from 13th st SW to 17th St
SW (Madera Isles & Echo Lake
$
-
$
$
$
-
$
341,000
$
341,000
Impact Fees
South County Brine Disposal
$
-
$
$
2,000,000
$
2,000,000
$
-
$
4,000,000
Impact Fees
H dromentia Pilot
$
200,000
$
$
-
$
-
$
$
200,000
Grant Fundis
58th Av 65th St to 69th St & along 61st and 69th
St
$
50,000
$
500,000
$
450,000
$
232,000
$
$
1,232,000
Impact Fees
Svice Transmission Lines Oslo Pk, Villages of
VB Gardens
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
700,000
$
$
700,000
Impact Fees
Install Wells and Piping at North County RO
Plant
$
1,948,293
$
$
-
$
-
$
$
1,948,293
Impact Fees
Install Well No.7 st S. Co. RO Plant
$
-
$
$
640,050
$
574,358
$
$
1,214,408
Impact Fees
12" W.M. along 66th Av. from 16th to 20th St.
$
229,418
$
$
-
$
-
$
$
229,418
Impact Fees
16" WM from Kings Tank to College Ln. and
Loop to Club of Vero
$
115,450
$
$
-
$
$
$
115,450
Impact Fees
Install 6" FM along 16th St west of 43rd Ave
$
-
$
$
100,000
$
$
$
100,000
Impact Fees
Install 24" WM along 77th St from 66th Ave to
70th Ave then North to CR 510
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
100,000
$
100,000
Impact Fees
N. Reg. Reuse Sto. & Repump Facility with
Transmission Mains to Barrier Island
$
1,512,490
$
$
$
$
-
$
1,512,490
Impact Fees
Brine line on 77th to CR510,Bridge conversion
& 16" line to AIA
$
984,000
$
$
$
$
$
984,000
Impact Fees
Construct 12" WM along 53rd St. E/O RR, Lat H
Canal
$
745,000
$
$
$
$
-
$
745,000
Impact Fees
Construct 20"WM on 66th Av 45th to 77th St
$
-
$
$
-
$
1,000,000
$
1,052,000
$
2,052,000
Impact Fees
Construct 20" WM on 66th Av from 20th St. to
45th St.
$
-
$
$
500,000
$
-
$
$
500,000
1 Impact Fees
Verona Trace Developer's Agreement
$
40,100
$
40,100
$
-
$
$
$
80,200
1 Impact Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 70
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Madera Isle/Echo Lake Dev Agreement
$
-
$
FY 2013/14
$
97,400
$
97,400
$
$
194,800
Impact Fees
Upgrade Dataflow System w/Auto Valves
$
200,000
$
$
-
$
-
$
Winter Beach Citizens Convenience Center
$
200,000
Impact Fees
Inst. FM Stub -out at 66th Av. & 16th St.
Raneline Canal
$
35,000
$
Phase I Improvements
$
-
$
$ 247,000
$
$ 247,000
$
35,000
Impact Fees
Vac Truck
$
-
$
$
285,000
$
$ -
$
285,000
$
570,000
User Fees
Total Expenditures
$
6,681,988
$
1,077,337
$
4,497,450
$
5,028,758
$
2,913,000
$
20,198,533
$
$ 1,430,000
Assessments & User Fees
Oslo Citizens Convenience Center Expansion
and Improvements
$ 2,500,000
$ -
$ -
Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue
j
FY 2010/11
Assessments & User Fees
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
$ -
Total Revenue
$
9,928,533
$
1,600,000
$
2,285,000
$
2,600,000
$
3,785,000
$
20,198,533
Total Expenditures
$
6,681,988
$
1,077,337
$
4,497,450
$
5,028,758
$
2,913,000
$
20,198,533
$ -
Annual Balance
Assessments & User Fees
$3,246,545
$ 125,000
$522,663
S -
-$2,212,450
$
-$2,428,758
Assessments & User Fees
$872,000
$0
Solid Waste
Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Assessments & User Fees $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802
Total Revenue $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802
Expenditures
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Revenue Source
Citizen Convenience Center Improvement
Projects
Winter Beach Citizens Convenience Center
Phase I Improvements
$ -
$
$
$ 247,000
$
$ 247,000
Assessments & User Fees
Roseland Citizens Convenience Center
Expansion and Improvements
$
$ -
$ 1,920,000
$ -
$
$ 1,920,000
Assessments & User Fees
Gifford Citizens Convenience Center Expansion
and Improvements
$
$ 1,430,000
$ -
$
$
$ 1,430,000
Assessments & User Fees
Oslo Citizens Convenience Center Expansion
and Improvements
$ 2,500,000
$ -
$ -
$
$
$ 2,500,000
Assessments & User Fees
Transfer Tractor/Transfer Trailers and Roll -off
Truck/Containers
$ -
$ 400,000
$ 280,000
$ 320,000
$ 667,802
$ 1,667,802
Assessments & User Fees
Design, Permitting & Construction of Class I
Landfill - Co Disposal (former 33 Acres for
C&D)
$ 6,450,000
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
$ 6,450,000
Assessments & User Fees
Retrofit of MRF
$ 125,000
$
S -
S
$
$ 125,000
Assessments & User Fees
Community Development Department Indian River County 71
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Partial Closure of Cell I, C&D Landfill, Seg -1,
Seg -2 and the Infill $ - $ - $ - $ 6,400,000 $ $ 6,400,000 Assessments & User Fees
Total Expenditures $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6.967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20.739,802
Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total WE
Total Revenue $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802
Total Expenditures $ 9,075,000 $ 1,830,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 6,967,000 $ 667,802 $ 20,739,802
Annual Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2011/12
FY 2013/14
FY 2012/13
Total
FY 2013/14
Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park
FY 2014/15
$
Total
Optional Sales Tax Funds
$ -
$
400,000
$
600,000
$
900,000
$
400,000
$
2,300,000
Grant
$ 969,000
$
-
$
-
$
2,000,000
$
4,500,000
$
7,469,000
MSTU Assessments
$ -
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
400,000
IRC Utility Det
$ -
$
-
$
250,000
$
-
$
-
$
250,000
Total Revenue
$ 969.000
$
500.000
$
950.000
$
3.000.000
$
5.000.000
$
10.419.000
0
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Revenue Source
Egret Marsh Regional Stormwater Park
$ 969,000
$
$ -
$
$ -
$ 969,000
Grant
PC North - North Relief Canal Treatment System
(Canal Screening System and Algal Turf
Scrubber System)
$ -
$
$ 200,000
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
$ 1,000,000
Optional Sales Tax Funds
PC North - North Relief Canal Treatment System
(Canal Screening System and Algal Turf
Scrubber System)
$
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
Grant
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System
(Canal Screening System and Algal Turf
Scrubber System)
$
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
$
$ -
$ 800,000
Optional Sales Tax Funds
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System
(Canal Screening System and Algal Turf
Scrubber S stem
$
$ -
$ 250,000
$
$ -
$ 250,000
IRC Utility Dept
PC South - South Relief Canal Treatment System
(Canal Screening System and Algal Turf
Scrubber System)
$
$
$ -
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 2,000,000
Grant
Community Development Department Indian River County 72
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Rockrid e Sure Protection Project
$
$
$
$
1,000,000
$
$
1,000,000
Grant
Rockrid e Surge Protection Project
$
$
$
$
500,000
$
- $
500,000
Optional Sales Tax Funds
Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III
$
$
100,000 $
100,000 $
100,000
$
100,000 $
400,000
MSTU Assessments
Vero Lake Estates Phase II and III
$
$
- $
- $
-
$
1,500,000 $
1,500,000
Grant
Total Expenditures
$
969,000 $
500,000 $
950,000 $
3,000,000
$
5,000,000 $
10,419,000
-
Comparison of Expenditures to Revenue FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Total Revenue $ 969,000 $ 500,000
$ 950,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,419,000
Total Expenditures $ 969,000 $ 500,000
$ 950,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 10,419,000
Annual Balance $0 s0
$0 $0 $0 $0
Revenue
FY 2010/11
FY 2010/11
FY 2012/13
FY 2011/12
FY 2014/15
FY 2012/13
Gas Tax
FY 2013/14
$ 11,850,525
FY 2014/15
18,381,957 $
Total
Gas Tax
$
10,297,507
$
2,232,000
$
2,255,000
$
6,237,971
$
6,237,971
$
27,260,449
Bond Proceeds -Gas Tax
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
44,805,166
$
44,805,166
Payback from FDOT-Gas Tax
$
7,865,009
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
7,865,009
Interest
$
280,000
$
280,000
$
280,000
$
280,000
$
280,000
$
1,400,000
Grant
$
8,095,502
$
2,000,000
$
1,500,000
$
1,200,000
$
2,339,000
$
15,134,502
Traffic Impact Fees District 1
$
741,497
$
400,000
$
500,000
$
600,000
$
750,000
$
2,991,497
Traffic Impact Fees District Il
$
17,764,311
$
900,000
$
1,200,000
$
1,400,000
$
1,600,000
$
22,864,311
Traffic Impact Fees District III
$
8,582,456
$
350,000
$
556,196
$
600,000
$
705,880
$
10,794,532
Developer Contributions
$
106,952
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
106,952
Optional Sales Tax
$
18,618,648
$
3,360,000
$
3,444,000
$
3,530,240
$
3,618,440
$
32,571,328
Payback from FDOT- Optional Sales Tax
$
4,051,671
$
2,000,000
$
4,000,000
$
4,771,900
$
-
$
14,823,571
Old Traffic Impact Fees
$
1,140,009
$
-
$
-
$
$
1,140,009
Developer Funded Construction
$
600,000
$
2,000,000
$
2,000,000
$
$
4,600,000
Total Revenue
$
78,143,562
$
13,522,000
$
15,735,196
$
18,620,111
$
60,336,457
$
186,357,326
Expenses
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Gas Tax
$ 8,089,641
$ 11,850,525
$ 13,812,706 $
18,381,957 $
27,996,194
$ 80,131,023
Grant
$ 8,095,502
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000 $
1,200,000 $
2,339,000
$ 15,134,502
Community Development Department Indian River County 73
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Traffic Impact Fees- District I
$
783,954
$
139,500
$
1,100,000
$
1,318,043
$
$
3,341,497
Traffic Impact Fees- District II
$
9,339,300
$
5,858,637
$
2,100,000
$
4,450,000
$
1,341,374
$
23,089,311
Traffic Impact Fees- District III
$
6,241,756
$
2,935,700
$
100,000
$
250,000
$
1,280,000
$
10,807,456
Old Impact Fees II
$
1,140,009
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,140,009
Developer Contributions
$
106,952
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
106,952
Optional Sales Tax
$
10,875,262
$
4,594,020
$
12,137,294
$
4,200,000
$
16,200,000
$
48,006,576
Developer Funded Construction
$
600,000
$
2,000,000
$
2,000,000
$
-
$
4,600,000
Total Expenses
$
45,272,376
$
29,378,382
$
32,750,000
$
29,800,000
$
49,156,568
$
186,357,326
Expenses jMMMVFM
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Grand Total I
Revenue Source
12th Street/27th Avenue
$
$
250,000
$
300,000
$
550,000
Impact Fees II
Design & Engineering
$
50,000
$
50,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
200,000
$
300,000
$
500,000
16th Street, 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue, two
lanes (1 mile)
$
110,012
$
$
$
110,012
Gas Tax
16th Street, 66th Avenue to 74th Avenue, two
lanes 1 mile
$
289,472
$
$
$
289,472
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
-
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
399,484
$
399,484
17th Street/AlA Intersection
$
1,140,009
$
$
$
1,140,009
Old Im act Fees 11
17th Street/AlA Intersection
$
101,500
$
101,500
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$
-
Right -of -Way
$
300,000
$
300,000
Construction
$
941,509
$
941,509
20th Avenue SW, 17th Street SW to 25th Street
SW, two lanes (1 mile)
$
383,635
$
S
$
383,635
Gas Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 74
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
20th Avenue SW, 17th Street SW to 25th Street
SW, two lanes 1 mile)
S
Impact Fees III
Design & Engineering$
Right -of -Way$
Construction
$ 383,635
$ 383,635
26th Street, 43rd Avenue to 66th Avenue,
four/five lanes (2 mile)
$ 375,687
$ 100,000
$
$ 475,687
Impact Fees II
Design & Engineering
$ 375,687
$ 100,000
$ 475,687
Right -of -Way
$ -
Construction
$ -
26th Street, 43rd Avenue to US #1, four/five
lanes 2 miles
$ -
$ 2,000,000
$
$ 2,000,000
Impact Fees II
26th Street, 43rd Avenue to US #1, four/five
lanes 2 miles
$ 5,190,000
$ -
$
$ 5,190,000
Grant
26th Street, 43rd Avenue to US #1, four/five
lanes 2 miles)
$ -
$ 4,000,000
$
$ 4,000,000
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
Right -of -Way
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
Construction
$ 5,040,000
$ 6,000,000
$ 11,040,000
Mr-
26th Street, 74th Avenue to 82nd Avenue, two
lanes
$ 600,000
$ 600,000
Developer Funded Construction
26th Street, 74th Avenue to 82nd Avenue, two
lanes
$ 849,919
$
$
$ 849,919
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$ -
Right -of -Way
$ -
Construction
$ 1,449,919
$ 1,449,919
27th Avenue -13th St SW -25th St SW
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
Impact Fees III
Design & Engineering
$ 10,000
$ 10,000
Right -of -Way
$ -
Community Development Department Indian River County 75
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Construction
$
27th Avenue -5th St SW -13th St SW
$
10,000
$
10,000
Impact Fees III
Design & Engineering
$
10,000
$
10,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
-
AL
27th Avenue -5th St SW -12th
$
10,000
$
10,000
Impact Fees Ill
Design & Engineering
$
10,000
$
10,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
-
43rd Ave. 3 -lane and Bridge Replacements 5th
Street and 43rd Avenue over S. Relief Canal
$
1,085,272
$
$
$
1,085,272
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering$
Right -of -Way
$
-
COnstructlon
$
1,085,272
$
1,085,272
43rd Avenue, 49th Street to 53rd Street, three
lanes .5 miles
$
1,000,000
$
$
1,000,000
Developer Funded Construction
Design & Engineering
$
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
1,000,000
$
1,000,000
43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 18th Street, four
lanes 1 mile
$
20,000
$
258,637
$
500,000
$
2,000,000
$
1,341,374
$
4,120,011
Impact Fees II
43rd Avenue, 12th Street to 18th Street, four
lanes 1 mile)
$
319,745
$
1,500,000
$
2,500,000
$
4,319,745
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$
20,000
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
320,000
Right -of -Way
$
528,382
$
450,000
$
400,000
$
1,378,382
Construction
S
3,000,000
$
3,741,374
$
6,741,374
43rd Avenue,12th Street to Oslo Road, four lanes
(2.5 miles)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Optional Sales Tax
43rd Avenue, 12th Street to Oslo Road, four lanes
2.5 miles
$
20,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
250,000
$
1,250,000
$
1,720,000
Impact Fees III
Community Development Department Indian River County 76
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Design & Engineering
$
20,000
$
20,000
Right -of -Way
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
250,000
$
250,000
$
700,000
Construction
$
1,000,000
lor
$
1,000,000
43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 18th Street to 26th Street -
4lanes
$
3,967,100
$
1,500,000
$
5,467,100
Impact Fees 11
43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 18th Street to 26th Street -
4 lanes
$
-
$
5,994,663
$
5,994,663
Gas Tax
43rd Avenue/SR 60 - 18th Street to 26th Street -
4lanes
$
1,500,000
$
2,100,000
$
3,105,337
$
6,705,337
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
467,100
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
667,100
Right -of -Way
$
1,500,000
$
1,500,000
$
2,000,000
$
5,000,000
Construction
$
3,500,000
$
2,000,000
$
7,000,000
$
12,500,000
45th Street Beautification
$
200,000
$
-
$
$
200,000
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$
-
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
200,000
$
200,000
47th Strect-F,ast of US 1
$
106,952
$
106,952
Developer Contributions
Construction
$
106,952
$
106,952
53rd Street — 58th Avenue to IR Blvd, add four
lanes
$
2,476,513
$
$
$
2,476,513
Impact Fees II
53rd Street — 58th Avenue to IR Blvd, add four
lanes
$
3,200,000
$
$
$
3,200,000
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
500,000
$
500,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
5,176,513
$
5,176,513
58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection
$
300,000
$
1,100,000
$
1,350,000
$
2,150,000
$
-
$
4,900,000
Impact Fees H
58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection
$
-
$
-
$
2,100,000
$
7,796,194
$
9,896,194
Gas Tax
58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection
$
-
$
$
-
$
5,000,000
$
5,000,000
Optional Sales Tax
58th Avenue / SR 60 Intersection
$
300,000
$
$
1,200,000
$
2,339,000
$
3,839,000
Grant
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
300,000
Right -of -Way
$
1,000,000
$
1,250,000
$
2,350,000
$
4,600,000
Community Development Department Indian River County 77
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Construction
$
600,000
S 3,000,000 $ 15,135,194 $
18,735,194
MMIL-
58th Avenue 49th -65th St - 4 lanes -58th Ave26th
to 53rd
$
1,000,000
$
2,000,000
$
3,000,000
Developer Funded Construction
Design & Engineering
$
-
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
1,000,000
$
2,000,000
$
3,000,000
ML
66th Ave 4th -12th St
$
2,201,606
$
-
$
-
$
2,201,606
Impact Fees III
66th Ave 4th -12th St
$
$
$
-
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
Right -of -Way
$
150,000
$
150,000
Construction
$
1,951,606
$
1,951,606
66th Ave, 12th to SR60
$
600,000
$
900,000
$
$
1,500,000
Impact Fees II
66th Ave, 12th to SR60
$
-
$
1,000,000
$
$
1,000,000
Gas Tax
66th Ave, 12th to SR60
$
-
Grant
67th Ave, 12th to SR60
$
2,000,000
$
2,000,000
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
200,000
Right -of -Way
$
600,000
$
600,000
Construction
$
1,900,000
$
1,800,000
$
3,700,000
66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four
lanes 2.25 miles & Side Streets
$
100,000
$
-
$
1,100,000
$
1,200,000
Impact Fees I
66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four
lanes 2.25 miles) & Side Streets
$
2,400,000
$
100,000
$
618,043
$
3,118,043
Gas Tax
66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four
lanes (2.25 miles) & Side Streets
$
1,500,000
$
1,500,000
Grant
66th Avenue - 77th Street to Barber St., four
lanes (2.25 miles) & Side Streets
$
7,831,957
$
7,831,957
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
200,000
$
400,000
Right -of -Way
$
500,000
$
500,000
Construction
$
1,900,000
1
$
10,850,000
$
12,750,000
Community Development Department Indian River County 78
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
66th Avenue, 41 st Street to 77th Street, four
lanes (4.0 -miles), Includes side streets & side
street bridges
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
Impact Fees H
Design & Engineering
$ -
Right -of -Way
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
Construction
$ -
66th Avenue,SR 60 to 41 st Street, four lanes
(4.0 -miles), Includes side streets & side street
bridges
$ -
$
$
$ -
Optional Sales Tax
66th Avenue, SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes
(4.0 -miles), Includes side streets & side street
bridges
$ -
$ 2,000,000
$ -
$
$ 2,000,000
Grant
66th Avenue, SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes
(4.0 -miles), Includes side streets & side street
bridges
$ 600,000
$ -
$
$
$ 600,000
Impact Fees II
66th Avenue, SR 60 to 41st Street, four lanes
(4.0 -miles), Includes side streets & side street
bridges
$ 3,000,000
$ 5,000,000
$
$ 8,000,000
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
$ 300,000
Right -of -Way
$ 500,000
$ 500,000
Construction
$ 4,900,000
$ 4,900,000
$ 9,800,000
82nd Avenue Over Lateral "D" Canal and 4th
Street/82nd Ave. Intersection Widening
$ 1,509,843
$ 1,509,843
Optional Sales Tax
82nd Avenue Over Lateral "D" Canal and 4th
Street/82nd Ave. Intersection Widening
$ 380,000
$ 380,000
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$ 80,000
$ 80,000
Right -of -Way
$ 300,000
1
1
1 $ 300,000
Construction
$ 1,509,843
$ 1,509,843
CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River, four lanes
$ 617,358
$ 130,780
$ 400,000
$ 2,300,000
$ 5,500,000
$ 8,948,138
Gas Tax
CR 510 - 61st Drive to Indian River, four lanes
(1.6 miles)
$ 189,325
$ 139,500
$ -
$ -
$ 328,825
Impact Fees I
$ 129,720
$ 5,000,000
$ 5,129,720
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$ 100,000
$ 100,000
Right -of -Way
$ 706,683
$ 400,000
$ 400,000
$ 2,300,000
$ 500,000
$ 4,306,683
Construction
$ 10,000,000
$ 10,000,000
Community Development Department Indian River County 79
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 80
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
CR 510, 75th Court to 61st Drive, four lanes
(1.5 miles)
$
531,727
$
700,000
$
600,000
$
4,700,000
$
3,500,000
$
10,031,727
Gas Tax
$
494,629
$
494,629
Impact Fees I
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
Right -of -Way
$
1,026,356
$
600,000
$
600,000
$
1,200,000
$
3,426,356
Construction
$
3,500,000
$
3,500,000
$
7,000,000
CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes (4.5
miles)
$
-
$
1,318,043
$
1,318,043
Impact Fees I
CR 510, CR 512 to 75th Court, four lanes (4.5
miles)
$
731,597
$
400,000
$
500,000
$
7,081,957
$
8,000,000
$
16,713,554
Gas Tax
$
3,000,000
$
5,000,000
$
8,000,000
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
365,799
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
565,799
Right -of -Way
$
365,799
$
400,000
$
400,000
$
1,800,000
$
2,965,799
Construction
$
9,500,000
$
13,000,000
$
22,500,000
Indian River Drive Sidewalk- North
$
300,000
$
$
$
300,000
Grant
Indian River Drive Sidwealk- North
$
219,959
$
219,959
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$
-
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construclion
$
519,959
$
519,959
12th Strcet Sidcwall<-43rd to 27th Ave
$
172,351
$
172,351
Grant
$
-
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
Misc. Intersection Improvements
$
$
172,351
300,000
$
600,000
$
600,000
$
600,000
$
600,000
$
$
172,351
2,700,000
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
400,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
300,000
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
2,300,000
Misc. Right of Way Acquisition
$
243,934
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
2,243,934
Gas Tax
Misc. Right of Way Acquisition
$
483,450
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
2,483,450
Optional Sales Tax
Community Development Department Indian River County 80
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital improvements Element
Right -of -Way
$
727,384
$
1,000,000
$
1,000,000 S 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $
4,727,384
Old Dixie Hwy/SRC - included in 3 lane
$
2,050,000
$
-
$
- $
2,050,000
Impact Fees III
Old Dixie Hwy/SRC - included in 3 lane
$
-
$
$
$
-
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
1,950,000
$
1,950,000
Oslo Road, 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, four
lanes 1 mile)
$
1,470,150
$
-
$
$
1,470,150
Impact Fees III
Oslo Road, 27th Avenue to 43rd Avenue, four
lanes 1 mile
$
1,100,000
$
1,500,000
$
$
2,600,000
Gas Tax
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
200,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
2,470,150
$
1,400,000
$
3,870,150
Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four
lanes 1 mile
$
500.000
$
2,835,700
$
$
3,335,700
Impact Fees III
Oslo Road, 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, four
lanes 1 mile
$
1,164,300
$
$
1,164,300
Optional Sales Tax
Design & Engineering
$
100,000
$
100,000
Right -of -Way
$
500,000
$
500,000
Construction
$
3,900,000
$
3,900,000
8th Street Sidewalk US 1 to 6th Avenue
$
$
$
Optional Sales Tax
8th Street Sidewalk USI to 6th Avenue
$
105,300
$
$
$
105,300
Grant
Design & Engineering
$
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
in���L
$
105,300
$
105,300
8th Street Sidewalk (18th Ct to Old Dixie Hwy)
$
129,720
$
$
$
129,720
Optional Sales Tax
8th Street Sidewalk (18th Ct to Old Dixie Hwy)
$
100,000
$
$
$
100,000
Grant
Design & Engineering
$
10,000
$
10,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
219,720
$
219,720
Community Development Department Indian River County 81
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Comparison of Ex enditures to Revenue =9 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Community Development Department Indian River County 82
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Indian River Blvd Sidewalk (12th Street to 17th
Street)
$
$
$
-
Optional Sales Tax
Indian River Blvd Sidewalk (12th Street to 17th
Street)
$
430,235
$
$
$
430,235
Grant
Design & Engineering
$
50,000
$
50,000
Right -of -Way
$
-
Construction
$
380,235
$
380,235
Old Dixie Sidewalk- 38th lane to 65th street
$
1,497,616
$
1,497,616
Grant
Construction
$
1,497,616
$
1,497,616
Traffic controllers
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
500,000
Gas Tax
Traffic Fiber Optic
$
120,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
520,000
Gas Tax
Traffic Fiber Optic
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
500,000
Optional Sales Tax
IR Lagoon -Mist Paving Projects
$
277,505
$
277,505
Optional Sales Tax
Construction
$
277,505
$
277,505
Design & Engineering
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
Right -of -Way
$
$
$
$
$
$
Construction
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
Traffic Controllers & Fiber Optic
$
320,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
1,520,000
Total Transportation
$
320,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
1,520,000
Design & Engineering
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Right -of -Way
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
0
Traffic Controllers & Fiber Optic
$
320,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
Total Transportation
$
320,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
Comparison of Ex enditures to Revenue =9 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Total
Community Development Department Indian River County 82
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element
Total Revenue $ 78,143,562 $ 13,522,000 $ 15,735,196 $ 18,620,111 $ 60,336,457 $ 186,357
Total Expenditures $ 45,272,376 1 $ 29,378,382 $ 32,750,000 $ 29,800,000 $ 49,156,568 $ 186,357
Annual Balance $32,871,186 1 -$15,856,382 -$17,014,804 -$11,179,889 $11,179,889
Revenue and Expenditure Summar
Revenue Source AL
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Env. Land Bonds
$
300,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
300,000
Grant
$
10,289,502
$
2,000,000
$
1,580,000
$
3,300,000
$
6,839,000
$
24,008,502
EmergencyEmLrgency Services Dist.
$
1,226,177
$
2,361,705
$
450,000
$
800,000
$
-
$
4,837,882
Optional Sales Tax
$
23,450,661
$
4,520,000
$
9,354,000
$
4,490,240
$
4,078,440
$
45,893,341
Impact Fees (Emergency Services, General
Services, Law Enforcement, Parks & Rec.)
2,010,755
$
3,325,000
$
2,005,000
$
5,025,000
$
2,500,000
$
14,865,755
Court Facility Surcharge
$
-
$
-
$
250,000
$
-
$
250,000
FBIP
$
200,000
$
$
-
$
-
$
200,000
Water and Sewer User Fees
$
-
$
$
285,000
$
285,000
$
570,000
Water and Sewer Impact Fees
$
1,200,000
$
1,600,000
$
2,000,000
$
2,600,000
$
3,500,000
$
10,900,000
Water and Sewer Cash Forward
$
8,528,533
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
8,528,533
Solid Waste Assessments & User Fees
$
9,075,000
$
1,830,000
$
2,200,000
$
6,967,000
$
667,802
$
20,739,802
MSTU Assessments
$
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
400,000
IRC Utilities Department
$
-
$
-
$
250,000
$
-
$
250,000
Gas Tax
$
10,297,507
$
2,232,000
$
2,255,000
$
6,237,971
$
6,237,971
$
27,260,449
Bonds Proceeds - Gas Tax
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
44,805,166
$
44,805,166
Payback from FDOT-Gas Tax
$
7,865,009
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
7,865,009
Interest
$
280,000
$
280,000
$
280,000
$
280,000
$
280,000
$
1,400,000
Traffic Impact Fees District I
$
741,497
$
400,000
$
500,000
$
600,000
$
750,000
$
2,991,497
Traffic Impact Fees District 11
$
17,764,311
$
900,000
$
1,200,000
$
1,400,000
$
1,600,000
$
22,864,311
Traffic Impact Fees District III
$
8,582,456
$
350,000
$
556,196
$
600,000
$
705,880
$
10,794,532
Developer Contributions
$
106,952
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
106,952
Community Development Department Indian River County 83
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Developer Funded Construction
$
600,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
FY 2014/15
$
$ 4,600,000
Payback from FDOT- Optional Sales Tax
$
4,051,671
$ 2,000,000
$ 4,000,000
$
4,771,900 $
$ 14,823,571
Old Traffic Impact Fees
$
1,140,009
$ -
$ -
$
$
$ 1,140,009
TOTAL
$
107,710,040
$ 23,898,705
$ 29,265,196
$
37,172,111 $ 72,349,259
$ 270,395,311
Expenditures by Category
FY 2010/11
FY 2011/12
FY 2012/13
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
Total
Conservation and Aquifer Recharge
$1,350,000
$75,000
$ -
$100,000
$
$
1,525,000
Emergency Services
$3,426,177
$2,361,705
$450,000
$3,000,000
$
$9,237,882
General Services
$189,508
$60,000
$4,160,000
$60,000
$60,000
$
4,529,508
Law Enforcement
$558,960
$1,900,000
$
$ -
$2,458,960
Parks and Recreation
$4,069,300
$2,050,000
$3,485,000
$2,825,000
$2,500,000
$
14,929,300
Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water
$6,681,988
$1,077,337
$4,497,450
$5,028,758
$2,913,000
$20,198,533
Solid Waste
$9,075,000
$1,830,000
$2,200,000
$6,967,000
$667,802
$20,739,802
StonnwaterManagement
$969,000
$500,000
$950,000
$3,000,000
$5,000,000
$10,419,000
Transportation
$45,272,376
$29,378,382
$32,750,000
$29,800,000
$49,156,568
$186,357,326
Total
$71,592,309
$39,232,424
$48,492,450
$50,780,758
$60,297,370
$
270,395,311
Total Revenues All Categories $ 107,710,040 $ 23,898,705 $ 29,265,196 $ 37,172,111 $ 72,349,259 $ 270,395,311
Total Expenditures All Categories $ 71,592,309 $ 39,232,424 $ 48,492,450 $ 50,780,758 $ 60,297,370 $ 270,395,311
Difference $36,117,731 -$15,333,719 -$19,227,254 -$13,608,647 $12,051,889 $0
Community Development Department Indian River County 84
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX B: 2030 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has adopted its 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). This plan prioritizes roadway
improvements through a 20 year planning horizon. The table below lists these prioritized roadway improvements. Because the LRTP prioritizes
long range roadway projects through 2030, or contains projects funded entirely by non -county sources, it includes some projects that are not in
Appendix A, the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements.
Community Development Department Indian River County 85
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
2030 Roadway Improvement Plan Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element
On Street
From
To
Base Road Type
Future Road Type Total Cost
I-95
S. County Line
N. County Line
4 Lane Freeway
6 Lane Freeway
$109,919,000
SR 60
98th Ave
I-95
4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$2,543,842
SIS Total
$112,462,842
SR 60
I-95
82nd Ave
4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$8,119,445
SR 60
6th Ave
Indian River Blvd
4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$1,864,758
y
US 1
S. County Line
Oslo Rd
4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$12,064,823
0
US 1
Aviation Blvd
Old Dixie Hwy (N)
4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$44,372,047
y
US 1
lRoseland Rd
IN. County Line
1 4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$5,255,518
Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year)
$10,000,000
Other State Roads Total
$81,676,591
4th St
98th Ave
66th Ave
00
2 Lane Undivided
$16,262,035
12th St
90th Ave
82nd Ave
00
2 Lane Undivided
$3,781,786
9
12th St
43rd Ave
27th Ave
2 Lane Undivided
2 Lane Divided
$2,854,618
13th St SW
66th Ave
58th Ave
00
2 Lane Undivided
$4,041,388
U
13th St SW
43rd Ave
34th Ave
00
1 2 Lane Undivided
$1,560,899
13th St SW
134th Ave
127th Ave
1 00
1 2 Lane Undivided
$3,359,684
Community Development Department Indian River County 85
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Community Development Department Indian River County 86
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
2030 Roadwa Im
rovement Plan Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element
On Street
From
To
Base Road Type
Future Road Type
Total Cost
13th St SW
27th Ave
20th Ave
00
2 Lane Undivided
$1,922,225
17th St SW
66th Ave
58th Ave
00
2 Lane Undivided
$4,019,519
26th St
66th Ave
43rd Ave
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$13,006,154
26th St
82nd Ave
74th Ave
00
2 Lane Undivided
$3,850,481
Aviation Blvd
43rd Ave
U.S. 1
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$8,537,828
27th Ave
S. County Line
Oslo Rd
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$9,560,909
27th Ave
Oslo Rd
S.R. 60
2 Lane Undivided
2 Lane Divided
$12,330,699
43rd Ave
S County Line
Oslo Rd
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$12,974,563
43rd Ave
Oslo Rd
8th St
2 Lane Undivided
2 Lane Divided
$8,311,058
53rd St
82nd Ave
66th Ave
00
2 Lane Undivided
$9,599,620
58th Ave
S County
Line/Koble and Rd
Oslo Rd
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$11,850,325
66th Ave
S County Line
Oslo Rd
00
2 Lane Undivided
$8,562,423
66th Ave
Oslo Rd
4th St
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$8,887,466
66th Ave
4th St
SR 60
2 Lane Divided
4 Lane Divided
$8,853,565
66th Ave
SR 60
C.R. 510
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$36,173,489
82nd Ave
S County Line
Oslo Rd
00
2 Lane Undivided
$7,302,941
82nd Ave
26th St
C.R. 510
00
2 Lane Undivided
$28,174,165
Laconia St
C.R. 510
C.R.512
00
2 Lane Undivided
$2,679,879
Aviation Blvd
Ext
U.S. 1
Indian River Blvd 00
4 Lane Divided
$14,387,771
C.R. 510
C.R. 512
U.S. 1
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$36,369,280
C.R. 510
U.S. 1
ICWW
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$3,718,539
C.R. 512
Fellsmere City Limits
I-95
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$19,192,929
C.R. 512
I-95
C.R. 510
4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$13,317,010
C.R. 512
C.R. 510
Roseland Rd
4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$6,674,370
8th St
82nd Ave
74th Ave
00
2 Lane Undivided
$3,955,196
Indian River Blvd Royal Palm
37th St
4 Lane Divided
6 Lane Divided
$8,678,255
Community Development Department Indian River County 86
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
Source: Indian River County MPO
F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS\CIE\2010\DCA TRANSMITTAL PACKAGE\2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT - ADOPTERDOC
Community Development Department Indian River County 87
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
2030 Roadwa Im
rovement Plan Table 4.9.3 of the Transportation Element
On Street
From
To
Base Road Type
Future Road Type Total Cost
Oslo Rd
I-95
58th Ave
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$19,484,669
Roseland Rd
C.R. 512
U.S. 1
2 Lane Undivided
2 Lane Divided
$12,847,897
Schumann Dr
C.R. 510
Barber St
2 Lane Undivided
4 Lane Divided
$3,974,335
Congestion Management System Projects ($500,000 Per Year)
$10,000,000
County Roads Total
$381,057,970
Barber St
Schumann Dr
1U.S. 1
1 2 Lane Undivided
2 Lane Divided
$3,621,587
Barber St
C.R. 512
Schumann Dr
1 2 Lane Undivided
2 Lane Divided
$7,596,306
U
City Roads Total
$11,217,893
Total
$576,415,296
Source: Indian River County MPO
F:\COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT\USERS\LONG RANGE\COMPPLAN AMENDMENTS\CIE\2010\DCA TRANSMITTAL PACKAGE\2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT - ADOPTERDOC
Community Development Department Indian River County 87
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX C: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE
Summary of Capital Improvement Program
Comprehensive Needs
Modernizations & Replacernsift
Dodgertorm Cafeteria 8 HVAC Replacement
Dodgerlov n School HVAC
Osceola Magnet Replacement
VBHS Freshman Leaming Ctr Renow.
Veto Bosch EI Roplacomon
Vero Beach H* Schad Restoration
4V3basso School Rerrovation
subtotal modemizatiorlea Rewacamar
Subtotal Compreherleive Needs
Odherlitems
Capital Maintenance
Capital Maintenanme (buyback)
Capital MairdwanodHllh 8 life Safety
HVAC Repair and Replace
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
3,512,50
3,512,590
Prior to
FY 2011 -
FY FY FY FY FY
Project
Total
2011
FY 2015
2011 2012 2013 2014_ 2015.
New Construction
1,00,000 1,000.000
20,174,852
5,174,852
15,00;00 15,000,000
New Construction and Add! tons
54,217,750
1,985,043
1,885,043
Fellsmere Cate. Expen b asrm Addn
8,000,000
0
0;000,000
9,000,000
Sebastian River H8 AddMon
13.000.000
13.000,000
Stoma Grove hWde School
45,048,476
45,068,470
Srpport Sumues Com plox
13,000,000
8,00,Opo
5,00;000
5,000,000
Traffic Improvement projects
820,000
0
820;000
820,000
Subtohl Naw Construietion and Additions
80,868,478
1 88,049,416
44,820,000
%8201000
Subtotal Now Construed on
80,868,478
1 86,048.478
14,M,O 00
14,8201000
Comprehensive Needs
Modernizations & Replacernsift
Dodgertorm Cafeteria 8 HVAC Replacement
Dodgerlov n School HVAC
Osceola Magnet Replacement
VBHS Freshman Leaming Ctr Renow.
Veto Bosch EI Roplacomon
Vero Beach H* Schad Restoration
4V3basso School Rerrovation
subtotal modemizatiorlea Rewacamar
Subtotal Compreherleive Needs
Odherlitems
Capital Maintenance
Capital Maintenanme (buyback)
Capital MairdwanodHllh 8 life Safety
HVAC Repair and Replace
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
3,512,50
3,512,590
2,750,000
2,750,000 2,750,000
20,000,000
0
20,00,000 20,000,000
3;150,000
2,15000
1,00,000 1,000.000
20,174,852
5,174,852
15,00;00 15,000,000
54.217,750
54,217,750
1,985,043
1,885,043
105,690,145
w
in
20,606,000
33,03,030 15,632,180 17,370,850 3,474,170 3,474,170 3,474,170 3,474,170 3,474,370
21,984,256 15,084,256 6,900,00 1,50,000 00,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 1,60,000
1,800,000 1,80,00
kadPan 73w Coun* l°hrb-Sc 5douis III
Indian River County 88
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
bxban a4 cowM PULi9ic scho is IV
Community Development Department Indian River County 89
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Prior to
FY 2411 -
FY
FY
FY
FY
FY
Project
Total
2011
FY 2015
2011
2012
2013
2414
2015
Subtotal Capital Mainlesiar—
66,787.288
'x2.518.436
24,270,850
4,974.170
4,374.176
4A74.17C
4.974.170
5.074.176
RMacat.biea
Reko Mahle L�lrlg
24,239,158
19.664.158
4.735,000
775,0[16
1,000,000
1.068,000
1,000.08o
1.000.000
itlalucalable Reno abon
1,8743,450
1.476.450
Sublotaf ttda[atobtas
25,7'k5 808 "
20,1M6,606
4,776,600
775,00!
-1,000.006
1.000,000
1.000,000
1,000,008
6lumtional Tachinc& t
mtrict Technulag7
10.233&02
7,483,802
3,350000
1,350,008
500,008
508,000
500,0110
500.040
SubtoW Educatiulsl 79chnalogy
10.633.602.
7,4&3.8+12
3,.350-094
1.350.000
500.1«70
500,000
500.000
SODA«
Furrlltura& Equipment
F.F&E B1r7bw*
6.802,M'
4.302,962
1.500,000
3)0,000
300,000
360.000
300,994
30DA08
School Ek ..Vd des
13,2803311
7,775330
5,475;000
325,000
1.500,000
658,800
1,500,000
1,500°000
SubtofAi Funlirure & Equipmwit
19.043,292
12,0n.292
6.975-0161
625.000
^1,800,1106
950.000
1.800.000
1.800.060
Ratorvo6 and Conlingandee
P-jeds MAKM VM.
18,840,409
4,126,172
11,740,237
1.557403
1,470,949
3.023,597
4,03$.969
4;052.325
Subtatet Raeervm and CmUngenclas
16.896,409
4,126,172
14,740,237
1.557,403
1,A70.645
3,023,.591
4,095.949
%652325
Sutltotd Uhler Hams
131,296397
77,095,310
54,itiA$7
9„281.573
4.14,6",119
10,367,761
12,310.139
13,028,4®5
Total Prolects
147,661.087
42,857.573
20,145,119
10.347,761
12,310,139
13„025,486
bxban a4 cowM PULi9ic scho is IV
Community Development Department Indian River County 89
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
APPENDIX D: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUMMARY OF
ESTIMATED REVENUE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2010 - 2011 Work Plan
Educational District Technology $1.350.000
$500.000
$500,000
$500,000
$509,000
$3,350,000
Local Expenditure Totals_ 520,685,847
$22,066,479
$22,564,665
$24,282,929
$24,528,282
$114,128,202
Revenue
1.50 Mill Revenue Source
Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included
in the tentative district facilities work program. All amounts. are NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP's, 1011.14 and 1011.15
loans, etc. Districts cannot use 1.5 -Mill funds for salaries except for those explicitly associated with maintenancekepair projects. (1011.71 (5), F.S.)
item
Fund
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014 -2015
Trial
340 $0
$0
Actual Value
Projected
Projected
Projected
Projected
5824.916
(1) Non-exempt property
$1,1'50,775
$14.998,024,735
$15,179,500,834
515,496,752,402
515,944,609,546
516.405,407,733
578,024,294,250
assessed valuation
S2,375,593
$2,094,603
551955465
(2) The Millege projected for
360
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.56
1.50
537,910
discretionary capital outlay per
s.1011.71
568,705
568,705
S68,705
568,705
569,705
5343,525
(3) Full value of the 1.50 -Mill
$26,196,692
$25,501,561
$26,036,564
$26,7136,942
$27,561.0135
$131,080.814
discretionary capital oul1ay per
s.1011.7i
(4) Value of the portion of the 1.50.
370
$21,587,156
$21,858,481
$22,315,323
$22,960,236
$23,623,787
$112,354,983
-Mill ACTUALLY levied
(5) Difference of lines (2) and (4)
$3,599,S26
$3,£43,080
$3,719,221
$3,826,706
$3,937,298
$18,725,831
PECO Revenue Source
The figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance" will be subtracted from funds available fcr new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot
be used for new construction.
ftm
Fund 2010-2011
Actual Budget
2011-2012
Projected
2012 - 2013
Projected
2013-2014
Projected
2014-2015
Projected
Total
PECO New Construction
340 $0
$0
$39,060
$1.109,187
5690.989
$1.839,236
PECO Maintenance Expenditures
5824.916
$472.019
$1,1'50,775
$1,266,406
$1,403,614
$5.117.730
561,123
5824,915
$472,019
51,159,&75
S2,375,593
$2,094,603
551955465
CO & DS Revenue Source
Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds.
Item
Fund
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
Total
Actual Budget
Projected
Projected
Projected
Projected
CO& DS Ca 6h FIaw-through
360
561.123
561.123
561.123
561,123
561.123
S305.615
Distributed
CO & DS Interest on
360
$7.682
$7,582
57,582
$7,582
$7,582
537,910
Undistributed CO
568,705
568,705
S68,705
568,705
569,705
5343,525
Fair Share Revenue Source
Page 4 of 18
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
919/2010 10:17:30 AM
Indian River County 90
Comprehensive Plan
Capital Improvements Element
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2010 - 2011 Work. Pian
All legally binding commitments for proportionate fair -share mitigation for impacts on pubilc school facilities must be included In the 5 -year district work program.
Nothing reported far this section
Sales Surtax Referendum
Specific Information about any referendum for a 1 -cent or Yrcent surtax referendum during the previous year.
Old the school district hold a surtax raiorandum during the past fiscal year 2009 - 2010? No
Additional Revenue Source
Any addlillonal revenue sources
Item
2010- 2011
Actual Value
2011-2012
Projected
2012-2013
Projected
2013-2014
Projeotod
2014-2015
Projected
Total
Proceeds from a -1011.14/15 F.S. Loans
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
District Bonds- Voted local bond
referendum proceeds per s.9, Art VII
State Constitution
So
s4
s0
s0
so
$0
Proceeds from Special Act Bonds
$0
$0
so
$0
$o
$0
Estimated Revenue from C4 & DS Bond
Sala
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Proceeds from Voted Capital
Improvements milloge
so
so
s9
so
so
s0
Other Revenue for Other Capital Projects
$30.000
$30,400
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
$150,000
Proceeds from 1/2 cent sales surtax
authorized by school board
so
so
so
s0
$o
so
Proceeds from local governmental
infrastructure sales surtax
so
s0
s0
s0
so
$0
Proceeds from Certificates of
Participation (COP'S) Sale
S16 000.000
$20,000,000
so
so
so
535,000.000
Classrooms Flrst Bond proceeds amount
authorized In FY 1997-98
$0
$0
$o
$0
$n
$0
Classrooms for !Gids
$0
$0
s0
s0
so
$0
District Equity Recognition
$0
$0
$0
$0
$a
$❑
Federal Grants
so
so
so
s0
s0
so
Proportion a to share mitigation (actu at
cash revenue only, not in kind donations)
$0
$0
s0
so
50
$0
Impact fees received
so
$o
s0
s0
so
so
Private donations
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Grants from local governments or not -for-
profit organizations
$0
so
5o
so
so
$0
Interest, Including Pr oflt On Invest men It
$107,9138
$109,293
$111,577
$114,501
$114.801
$559,456
Page 5 of 18
Community Development Department
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024
919/2010 10:17; 30 AM
Indian River County 91
Comprehensive Plan
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Capital Improvements Element
2010 - 2011 Work Plan
Revenue from Bonds pledging proceeds
$0
so
so
s0
$0
$0
from 1 cent or 112 cent Sales Surtax
Budget
Projected
Projected
Projected
Projected
5343,525
Total Fund Balance Carried Forward
$12,452,000
s0
s0
s0
$0
512,452,000
General Capital Outlay Obligated Fund
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Balance Carried Forward From Total
($20,605,847)
($22,066,479)
($22,564,665)
($24,282,929)
($24,529,282)
{$114,129,202)
Fund Balance Carried Forward
Special Facilities Construction Account
50
50
s0
s0
$0
$0
One Cent - 12 Cent Sales Sulrtax Debt
so
so
s0
s0
so
$0
Service From Total Fund Balance Carried
Forward
Capital Outlay Projects Funds Balance
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Carried Forward From Total Fund
Balance Carried Forward
RAN PROCEEDS
$5,000,000
50
s0
so
$0
$5,000,000
Subtotal
$32,589,986
520,139,293
$141,577
$144,801
S144,801
553,160,458
Total Revenue Summary
Item Name
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
Five Year Total
CO & DS Revenue
Budget
Projected
Projected
Projected
Projected
5343,525
Local 1.5 Mill Discretionary Capital Outlay
521,597,156
621,858,481
522.345.323
522,960236
523.623.787
5112.354.983
Revenue
$32,589.986
520.138, 2S3
$141,577
$144,901
S144 801
$55,160,459
PECO and 1.5 Mill Maint and Other 1.5
($20,605,847)
($22,066,479)
($22,564,665)
($24,282,929)
($24,529,282)
{$114,129,202)
Mill Expenditures
PECO Maintenance Revenue
$924,916
$472,019
$1,150,775
$1,266,406
$1,403,614
$5,117,730
Available 1.50 Mill for New
$911,309
($207,998)
($249,342)
($1,322,693)
($904,495)
($1,773,219]
Construction
Item Name
2010-2011
Budget
2011-2012
Projected
2012-2013
Projected
2013- 2014
Projected
2014-2015
Projected
Five Year Total
CO & DS Revenue
$66.705
568.705
668.705
666,705
568.705
5343,525
PECO New Con st ruction Revenue
$0
so
S39.060
$1,109,197
5690,999
$1,93%236
Other/Additional Revenue
$32,589.986
520.138, 2S3
$141,577
$144,901
S144 801
$55,160,459
TotalAddltionai Revenue
$32,658,H91
$20,207,998
$249,342
$1,322,593
$994,495
$55,343,219
Total Available Revenue $33,570,0011 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $53,570„000
Proiect Schedules
Capacity Project Schedules
A schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms for the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs.
Page 6 of 18 9R3l2010 10:17:30 AM
Community Development Department Indian River County 92
Adopted November 2, 2010, Ordinance 2010-024