HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/15/1981WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 1981
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MET IN REGULAR SESSION AT THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
1053 20TH PLACE, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA, ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 1981,
AT 8:30 O'CLOCK A.M. PRESENT WERE PATRICK B. LYONS, CHAIRMAN;
WILLIAM C. WODTKE, JR., VICE CHAIRMAN; DICK BIRD; ALFRED GROVER
FLETCHER; AND DON C. SCURLOCK, JR. ALSO PRESENT WERE NEIL A. NELSON,
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; L.S. "TOMMY" THOMAS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL 000RDI-
NATOR; GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR., ATTORNEY TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS-
SIONERS; JEFFREY K. BARTON, FINANCE DIRECTOR; DAN FLEISCHMAN, BAILIFF;
AND JANICE CALDWELL AND VIRGINIA HARGREAVES, DEPUTY CLERKS.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO
THE FLAG, AND REVEREND J. C. GLENN, CHAPLAIN, INDIAN -RIVER MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL, GAVE THE INVOCATION.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS TO THE
AGENDA.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REQUESTED ADDING TWO ITEMS: A
BIOLOGICAL REPORT RECEIVED ON INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD NEEDS TO BE READ
INTO THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD, AS WELL AS THE CITY COUNCIL. ALSO,
HE WANTED TO MAKE A SHORT PRESENTATION TO ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS.
CHAIRMAN LYONS REQUESTED ADDING AN ITEM CONCERNING MANDATORY
WATER CONSERVATION, AND THE LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK�REQUESTED ADDING AN -ITEM REGARDING
THE GIFFORD SEWER AND WATER COMMITTEE MEETING,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK,_SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD., THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO ADD THE ABOVE EMERGENCY ITEMS
TO THE AGENDA.
P00 6 PAGE 82 3
,JUL 15 1981
J U L 151991
141111im . iu a ._-
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON PROCEEDED TO PRESENT TWO FLAGS TO
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER TO USE TO INDICATE HIS NEGATIVE OR AFFIRMATIVE
VOTES. THE RED FLAG WOULD BE USED TO INDICATE A NEGATIVE RESPONSE,
AND THE GREEN WOULD BE FOR HIS AFFIRMATIVE VOTE, THE ADMINISTRATOR
EXPLAINED.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER GRATEFULLY ACCEPTED THE FLAGS,
COMPLIMENTS OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
CLERK TO THE BOARD
PRISONERS.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE COSTS OF HOUSING FEDERAL
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BUDGET AMENDMENT TO COVER
THE COSTS OF HOUSING FEDERAL PRISONERS, AS FOLLOWS:
ACCOUNT TITLE ACCOUNT No, INCREASE DECREASE
SHERIFF 001-000-341-52.00 $21,959
EXPENSE—BUDGET
OFFICE 001-600-521-99.93 $21,959
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED TAX SALE CERTIFICATE N0. 239
IN THE AMOUNT OF $39.55 FOR ,JAMES CASH.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED STATE WITNESS PAYROLLS, CIRCUIT
COURT, SPRING TERM, 1981, IN THE AMOUNT OF $134.08; COUNTY COURT,
JUNE TERM, 1981, IN THE AMOUNT OF $152.13.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CHAIRMAN'S SIGNATURE TO ACCEPT
BOND OF NEW DEPUTY SHERIFF, .JERRY R. TILLMAN.
THE FOLLOWING REPORTS WERE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK:
REPORT OF CONVICTIONS, MONTH OF JUNE, 1981
TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU — SPECIAL TRUST FUND
MONTH OF JUNE, 1981 - $27,393.57
TRAFFIC VIOLATION FINES BY NAME — JUNE, 1981
THE BOARD AGREED TO REMOVE ITEMS 5A REGARDING THE AUDIO
SOUND SYSTEM BID, AND 5B REGARDING THE VEHICLE INSPECTION PROGRAM
FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.
REGIONAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: July 8, 1981 FI LE:
Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT, Regional Correctional Facility Feasibilit
FROM:CA-C,-� REFERENCES: St Lucie County Administrator
Weil lson letter dated June 24, 1981.
County. Administrator
The Administration is in receipt of above referenced letter from Weldon B. Lewis,
County Administrator of St. Lucie County inquiring as to our possible interest in
development of a regional correctional facility to serve the immediate three or
four county area. This facility could.be operated through a joint venture involv-
ing Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River Counties, and would be intended to elimin-
ate the necessity of the individual counties each providing new or additional
correctional facilities.
1. Description & Conditions
In light of our present Indian River County jail situation, and the expected
growth rate of Indian River County during the next twenty year period, the
Administration believes the pursuit of a joint venture with surrounding counties
may be a concept worth pursuing. Accordingly, the Admin.istratioh requests
Board concurrence, authorization for the Administration to reply to Mr. Lewis's
letter, and to participate in discussions regarding development of_a joint
venture facility.
As the concept of a joint.facility materializes, the Administration will keep
the Board advised regarding potential benefit to Indian River County, potential
costs to Indian River County, and other pertinent data ancr information.
2. Recommendation
The Administration recommends Board approval of the administrations' partici-
pation in these initial discussions regarding a multi -county joint venture
correctional facility.
BOOK PACE825
J U L 15 1981
3 °` t
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE ADMINISTRATORS RECOMMENDA-
TION REGARDING A MULTI -COUNTY JOINT VENTURE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.
AUDIO SOUND SYSTEM BID
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REVIEWED THE AUDIO SOUND SYSTEM BID
FOR THE COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS AS FOLLOWS:
TO: Chairman, Board of County DATE: July 6, 1981 FILE:
Commissioners
SUBJECT: Bid x`86 - Audio Sound System -
County Commissioners Chambers
FROM: Chairman, REFERENCES:
Bid Committee
1. A public meeting was held at 11:00 A.M., June 23, 1981 in the County
Administrator's office, 2345 14th Ave., Vero Beach, F1.. This meeting.,
was so advertised in the.Vero Beach Press Journal on May 27, 28, and
29, 1981.
2. The purpose of this meeting was to open and record IRC Bid #86, Audio
Sound System to be installed in the County Commissioners Chambers located
in the New County Administration Building.
,5 Bid Proposals sent out, 1 received, 1 No Bid received.
The specifications for this system were very high in order for the County
to have a system of quality and durability.
The Bid Committee recommends this bid be awarded to the only bidder, WGYL,
Vero Beach, Florida in the amount of $11,628.50. -Subsequent to the warranty
period, the annual maintenance will be $300.00 annually. A
The Committee feels that we could have specified and received bids for
lesser quality and cheaper systems, but in the best interest of the County
this more costly system should be the best investment. Economy systems -
would have cost between $5,500 and -$8,500.
Fund Account #301-130-519-66.51
AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, ADMINISTRATOR NELSON EXPLAINED THE
REASON FOR LACK OF BID INTEREST IS BECAUSE THE SPECIFICATIONS ARE
EXTREMELY HIGH FOR THIS SOPHISTICATED EQUIPMENT. HE ADDED THAT THE
DIRECTION HE RECEIVED FROM THE BOARD WAS TO GET A GOOD SOUND SYSTEM,
AND ASKED THE TECHNICIAN FOR THE COURTHOUSE TO WRITE THE SPECIFICATIONS.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED IT BOTHERED HIM TO HAVE A
MAN BE THE COURTHOUSE EXPERT, WRITE UP THE BID SPECIFICATION, AND
THEN BID ON IT.
LENGTHY DISCUSSION ENSUED, AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE
SPECIFICATIONS WERE WRITTEN FOR NO SPECIFIC BRAND NAME - JUST SO THEY
REACHED A CERTAIN QUALITY.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ADVISED THAT THE SPECS WERE SENT OUT
TO FIVE BIDDERS, WITH JUST ONE RESPONSE. SOME SAID THEY WOULD LIKE
TO COME IN WITH THEIR OWN DESIGN.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED CONCERNING THE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE BID COMMITTEES RECOMMENDATION
TO ACCEPT THE BID OF WGYL FOR THE AUDIO SOUND SYSTEM IN THE COUNTY
COMMISSION CHAMBERS, AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID MEETING
SPECIFICATIONS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,628.50, AS DESCRIBED IN THE
JULY 6, 1981 MEMORANDUM FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BID COMMITTEE.
NEWSMAN MARK WEINBERG, OF RADIO STATION WTTB, DISCUSSED THE
SOUND SYSTEM WITH THE BOARD AND REQUESTED THAT SOMETHING BE BUILT IN
TO ENABLE THE NEWS MEDIA TO LISTEN TO THE TAPES WITHOUT INCONVENIENCING
THE COURT PERSONNEL.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT IT ALL DEPENDED ON HOW THE
JUDGES WERE WILLING TO WORK WITH THE NEWS MEDIA,AT THE COURTHOUSE.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON SUGGESTED MR. WEINBERG SPEAK TO THE
BAR ASSOCIATION ON THIS MATTER.
THE BOARD NEXT CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING MEMO REGARDING
THE VEHICLE INSPECTION PROGRAM:
BOG 6 PAGE 04-1
JUL 15 1981
TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE:
Board of County Commissioners
July 7, 1981
book
FILE:
SUBJECT.- Vehicle Inspection Program
FROM: �� EFERENCES: House Bill # 101
Neil Nelson
County A ministrator --
Description & Conditions
As reported at the June 17, 1981 Board meeting the Legislature has passed
House Bill 101 repealing the "Motor Vehicle Safety Inspection" program,
effective October], 1981. It has been reported that Governor Graham as
expected, has signed the -bill into law.
This new law provides a local option for counties desiring to continue with
a safety inspection program on their own, as follows:
"F.S.S. 325.001 --Periodic Motor Vehicle Inspection.
Provisions in. the law to the contrary notwithstanding, any
county which chooses to have a periodic motor vehicle in- _
spection program may establish one."
As previously reported, Indian River County has four authorized inspection
stations:
Auto Clinic of Vero Beach
Courtesy Auto Service, Vero Beach
Keller's Chevron, Vero Beach
Phelp's Garage & Inspection_ Station, Sebastian
The Florida Department of Motor Vehicles has reported the following in-
spection certificates -issued for Indian River County:
1979 - 42,258
1980 45,657.
Based upon current inspection fee of $3.00, delinquent charge of $1.00 and
sticker cost of $.40, the program has generated the following estimated
revenues during the past two years:
Inspection Station
Net Inspection Fees
1979 $109,871.00
1980 $118,708.00
Alternative and Analysis
The County appears to have three basic options:
State of Florida
Sticker Charges Delinquent Fees
516,903.00
518,263.00
I. Take no action, allowing the inspection program to lapse on
October 1, 1981.
II. Pass local ordinance establishing inspection program for Indian
River County. Provide inspections by contracting with existing
private inspection stations.
v
6
$]2,677.00
$13,697-00
III.Pass local ordinance establishing inspection program for Indian
River County. Provide inspections by establishing County owned
and operated inspection stations.
I. Should the County allow the program to lapse, the following local
impacts can be expected:
A. Loss of direct revenue to inspection stations of approximately
$120,000.00 annually, with some loss of jobs, and loss of
multiplier effect..
B. Savings to Indian River County residents and businesses of
approximately $150,000.00 annually in direct costs,.with
additional indirect savings by eliminating transportation
to-, and waiting time at, inspection stations. Undoubtedly,
a major portion of this savings will be used for other purposes,
thus creating i.ts own multiplier effect.
C. Some; -presently indeterminable, increase in cost of automobile
insurance.
If. Should tie County exercise the local option, and continue to contract
wi_th private inspection stations, the following _impacts can be expected:
A. Reduction of revenue to private stations as a result of
vehicle owners registering vehicles in surrounding counties
which do not.have inspection requirements. The percentage
of owners who would register in other counties cannot.be
_ accurately determined at this time, .however 30 to 35 percent
does not seem unrealistic.
B. Increased costs to County government to coordinate, monitor and
regulate private inspection stations, print and control inspection
stickers, etc. These costs cannot be accurately determined at this
time, but it seems unlikely they could be covered by the estimated
revenues of $20,000.00 which might be generated under the existing
fee system, (sticker charges plus delinquent fees, less 30-35% attrition).
C.. Possible avoidance of anticipated increased auto insurance costs,
amount indeterminable.
III. Exercise of the local option, with the County operating its own
stations would have the following impacts:
A. Estimated capital costs for a minimum of two inspection stations
at $85,000.00 to $100,000.00 each. Annualized cost for a thirty
year amortization would be $21,000.00 to $25,000,00.
B. Registering of vehicles in neighboring counties (See II -A).
C. Insurance (See I I -C) .
D. Loss of income to private inspection stations (See I -A).
E. Increased costs to County government. County would be challenged
to operate system and amortize capital costs within the estimated
total revenues of $100,000.00.
Additional Comments
A. The impact of local vehicles being registered in neighboring
counties may be minimized, somewhat, by the State's permanent
license plate program. License plates, already issued with the
Indian River County name, will not be changed for -several years,
regardless of where the annual renewal sticker is purchased.
Additionally, it should be possible to include language within
a local option ordinance making inspection requirements applicable,
based upon where the vehicle is housed/parked, and/or the address
of -the owner, not where it is registered.
JUL 15 K X46 Pn 8-2 '
1
981 � ..
.I
t7��.
46 PAU $.30
JUL 15191 8 d ---
B. Sheriff Tim Dobeck, by letter dated June 19, 1981., has indicated
his support for a continued inspection program in Indian River
County, and his willingness to work with the Board to establish
a "program that will be suitable for all parties concerned".
C. -Information available indicates neither Brevard, St. -Lucie, Martin,
Okeechobee nor Palm Beach Counties intends to continue an inspection
program after October 1, 1981. Indications, from the State Assoc
iation of County Commissioners, are that most counties.will discon-
tinue vehicle inspections.'
Recommendations
Based upon the foregoing review, the A;:,:,inistration believes it may be
feasible for Indian River County to exercise the local option and continue
a vehicle inspection program. utilizing Alternative II, Private Inspection
Stations.
To further explore the desirability of this approach, and to insure input
from all interested segments of the community the Administration proposes
the Board of County Commissioners hold a workshop meeting on July 22, 1981
at 7:00 P,M. in the County Court Room, The following, or their representatives,
should be invited to participate; in addition to the County staff:
1. Private inspection station operators.
2. Sheriff Dobeck.
3. Florida /Highway Patrol. Mo
4. Gene E. rris, Indian River County Tax Collector.
5. Municipalities,
6. State Insurance Commissioner's Office.
7. Automobile A nsurance Company Representatives.
8. Other interested citizens.
Hopefully, input provided at the workshop will make it possible to reach.
consensus regarding both f easibliity and desirability of pursuing -establish-
ment of a local option vehicle inspection program.
COMMISSIONER BIRD APPEALED TO THE NEWS MEDIA TO GIVE AS
MUCH PUBLICITY AS POSSIBLE FOR THIS OPEN WORKSHOP TO GET THE NECESSARY
PUBLIC INPUT.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COM—
MISSIONER BIRD, FOR THE BOARD TO APPROVE HOLDING A WORKSHOP ON
jU LY 24, 1981 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNTY COURTROOM.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED.
CHAIRMAN LYONS REQUESTED THE ADMINISTRATOR TO PREPARE A
LETTER FOR HIS SIGNATURE INVITING OFFICIALS FROM NEIGHBORING COUNTIES.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION,
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
IT WAS VOTED ON AND
8 � .
TRANSFER OF -MOORINGS -SEWER SYSTEM FRANCHISE DISCUSSION
DOROTHY HUDSON, REPRESENTING THE MOORINGS, DISTRIBUTED
SOME MATERIAL TO THE BOARD FOR THEIR PERUSAL. SHE INTRODUCED
LOUIS AIELLO, PRESIDENT OF HUTCHINSON UTILITIES, INC., WHO WILL
DISCUSS HIS PROPOSAL AND SOLICIT COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD.
CHAIRMAN LYONS COMMENTED THAT SOONER OR LATER THIS SYSTEM
WILL COME TO THE COUNTY AND, BASED ON WHAT HAS HAPPENED WITH OTHER
FRANCHISES, HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT THE SYSTEM GETTING AWAY FROM AN
ORGANIZATION THAT NOW HAS FINANCIAL BACKGROUND AND RESPONSIBILITY.
MS. HUDSON STATED THAT THEY ARE DEVELOPERS AND ARE NOT IN
THE SEWER AND TREATMENT BUSINESS - THE MOORINGS WILL NOT BE THERE
FOREVER. SHE ADDED THAT THEY HAVE SOME IMMEDIATE IMPROVEMENTS TO
THE SYSTEM THAT NEED TO BE DONE, AND MR. AIELLO HAS ALREADY ORDERED
A NEW SEWER PLANT. MS. HUDSON FELT THAT AS FAR AS FINANCIAL BACKING
WAS CONCERNED, HE WAS FINANCIALLY WILLING AND ABLE TO TAKE CARE OF
THE SYSTEM BETTER THAN THE MOORINGS.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER COMMENDED THE FREE MARKET SYSTEM, AND
JUST BECAUSE THE COUNTY HAS HAD PROBLEMS WITH OTHER FIRMS IS NO REASON
TO STAMP THEM ALL AS INCOMPETENT.
COMMISSIONER BIRD FELT THAT IF THE MOORINGS WAS ENTERING
INTO AN OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH HUTCHINSON UTILITIES, INC., IT WOULD
BE FINE, BUT HE WOULD HAVE PROBLEMS WITH RELEASING THIS FRANCHISE TO
A COMPANY THAT THE COUNTY REALLY DID NOT KNOW THAT MUCH ABOUT.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK NOTED THE PROBLEM WAS THAT THE BOARD
HAS NOT HAD THE PROPER CONTROLS, SUCH AS NOT HAVING A GOOD FRANCHISE
AGREEMENT. HE WENT ON THAT MANY OF THESE SYSTEMS ARE OPERATED BY
PEOPLE WHO ARE DEVELOPERS, AND THEIR SYSTEMS ARE BEING SUBSIDIZED.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK FELT THAT A PROPER FRANCHISE WHERE A SYSTEM IS
ON-GOING IS THE KEY; HE THOUGHT AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS WAS NEEDED.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WANTED TO HEAR THE FULL
PRESENTATION. HE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE WASTE WATER PLANS
OF THE MOORINGS SO THAT WHEN THEIR DEVELOPMENT IS THROUGH, IT WILL
HAVE A GOOD RATE STRUCTURE.
BOOK _ 6 PAGE 831
JUL 15 1981
9
. P�1^E 83
JUL 151991
DISCUSSION TOOK PLACE, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT COMMIS-
SIONER SCURLOCK WOULD CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE MOORINGS CONCERNING
THIS MATTER.
ROBERT RYDER, REPRESENTING THE MOORINGS PROPERTY OWNERS,
APPROACHED THE BOARD AND EXPRESSED CONCERN AT THE NET WORTH FIGURE
OF $24,206 FOR HUTCHINSON UTILITIES. HE THOUGHT THE BOARD,.,HAD A
RESPONSIBILITY TO BUILD ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS IN THE WAY OF ESCROW
MONEY, OTHERWISE IT COULD ULTIMATELY CAUSE HIGHER TAXES FOR THE
TAXPAYERS,
MS. HUDSON EXPLAINED THAT THE FIGURE HE REFERRED TO WAS
FROM LAST DECEMBER, 1980.
MR. AIELLO CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND REPORTED THAT HUTCHINSON
UTILITIES, INC. HAD BEEN FORMED LAST YEAR; BUT HE HAD BEEN IN THE
UTILITY BUSINESS FOR THE PAST 24 YEARS, SOME OF THE PROJECTS HE HAD
WORKED ON WERE JOHNS ISLAND, CASTAWAY COVE, AND VILLAGE GREEN. MR.
AIELLO STATED THAT HE HAD BEEN IN THE COUNTY SINCE 1977, AND MENTIONED
HTS VARIOUS STAFF MEMBERS. HE NOTED THAT IT TOOK HIM QUITE A BIT OF
TO ORGANIZE HIS STAFF; THEY WANT TO TAKE THE SEWER PLANT FROM
'7 -SIGN, ALL THE WAY TO INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS,
MR. RYDER EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT MR. AIELLO's NET WORTH
AND ASKED IF HE WAS USING HIS PERSONAL ASSETS AS BACKING FOR HUTCHINSON
UTILITIES.
MR. AIELLO RESPONDED AFFIRMATIVELY. HE ADVISED THAT SINCE
DECEMBER, 1980, THEY HAVE BEEN OPERATING THE MOORINGS' SYSTEM.
.JOHN MORRISON, TAXPAYER, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND RELATED
THE HISTORY OF MANY PACKAGE PLANTS IN THE COUNTY, SOME OF WHICH ARE
NOW DEFUNCT. WITHOUT REFERRING IN ANY FASHION TO THE COMPETENCE AND
INTEGRITY OF HUTCHINSON UTILITIES, HE ALSO FELT THEY COULD_GO__DEFUNCT.
MR. MORRISON COULD SEE NO REASON FOR THIS TRANSFERo AND HE FELT THE
INFORMATION WAS VAGUE AS TO THE LIABILITY OF THE PARTNERS IN THE
CORPORATION. HE BRIEFLY MENTIOMM, WATER "AILABILITY IN THE AREA,
MR. AIELLO RESPBED THAT THEY WERE NOT DEVELOPERS, BUT
THEY HAVE A DEVELOPER WHO IS RESPONSIBLE AND THE MOORINGS IS NOW SAYING
THAT THEY CANNOT TAKE CARE OF THE SYSTEM AND WOULD LIKE TO TURN IT
OVER TO HUTCHINSON UTILITIES.
MR. MORRISON REITERATED HE WAS CONCERNED THAT HUTCHINSON
UTILITIES WOULD BECOME INCUMBENT ON THE COUNTY` AS HE DID NOT THINK
THEY HAVE THE FINANCIAL CAPABILITIES TO DO THE JOB.
MR. AIELLO STRESSED THAT THEY DO HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO
THE JOB - THEY HAVE PURCHASED A PLANT AND THEY HAVE PLANS TO SHOW
EXPANSION. HE NOTED THIS SYSTEM WOULD BE A TOTAL BUILD -OUT AND IT
IS BEING DONE TWO OR THREE YEARS IN ADVANCE, AND THAT SHOULD TAKE
SOME OF THE WORRY OFF THE MINDS OF THE COMMISSIONERS.
COMMISSIONER BIRD REFLECTED ON AN OLD SAYING THAT YOU MAKE
MONEY IN THE WATER BUSINESS BUT NOT IN THE SEWER BUSINESS. WITH THA,
THOUGHT IN MIND, HE ASKED WHY MR. AIELLO WANTED THIS FRANCHISE, WHY
HE WANTED TO UPGRADE THIS SYSTEM, AND DID HE HAVE ANY INTENTIONS OF
PROVIDING SERVICE ONLY IN THE MOORINGS.
MR. AIELLO STATED THAT IF THEY COULD PROVIDE OTHER SERVICE,
THEY WOULD BE GLAD TO DO S0, AS THEIR FACILITY WOULD HAVE RESERVE
STORAGE - BUT IT IS BEING DESIGNED FOR THE MOORINGS.
COMMISSIONER BIRD NOTED THAT THEY WERE WILLING TO SPEND
$100,000 TO MAKE THE IMPROVEMENTS, AND INQUIRED IF THEY COULD OPERATE
IN THE. MOORINGS AND MAKE MONEY AT THE PRESENT RATES.
MR. AIELLO RESPONDED NEGATIVELY.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE MOORINGS
WAS LOSING $30,000 A YEAR. THE MONEY THAT HAS BEEN SPENT SINCE DECEMBER
ON THE SYSTEM HAS BEEN THAT OF HUTCHINSON UTILITIES.
CHAIRMAN LYONS -ASKED THE ATTORNEY ABOUT THIS SITUATION WHERE
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES WAS SPENDING MONEY IN ANTICIPATION OF TAKING
OVER THE FRANCHISE. HE EXPRESSED CONCERN BECAUSE MR. AIELLO HAS MADE
SOME COMMITMENTS AND ALL OF A SUDDEN THE COUNTY HAS BECOME A PART
OF IT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT THINK THAT THE COUNTY WAS AT THAT
POINT NOW, AND FELT THAT MR. AIELLO IS AT RISK IN SPENDING THIS MONEY.
JUL 15 'dqa� 11
Boos 6 FAI)t833
z
ELLS �� C nr �tl
JUL 15 1981
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED THAT WE CANNOT SOLVE EVERYBODY IS
PROBLEMS AND FELT THE DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY SHOULD BE ON THE USERS.
HE BELIEVED THAT NEGOTIATIONS SHOULD BE GOING ON BETWEEN THE USERS
AND THE POTENTIAL OPERATOR OF THIS PLANT - THERE OUGHT TO BE AN
OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO TAKE OVER THIS OPERATION.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD IS OVERLOOKING
THE FACT THAT THE MOORINGS IS HERE TODAY ABOUT 332, YEARS BEFORE THEY
HAVE TO BE; THEY ARE LOOKING FGR AN'.ORDERLY, ON—GOING CORPORATION
TO TAKE OVER FOR THEM. HE ADDED THAT THEY HAVE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
WHO CAN TAKE THIS OVER, AND HE FELT THE MOORINGS SHOULD BE COMMENDED
Lmd:l"
MR. AIELLO COMMENTED THAT THEIR PURPOSE WAS SIMPLY TO SEE
IF THEY COULD BE PUT ON THE AGENDA ON AUGUST 19TH. HE CONTINUED THAT
THEY HAVE EXTENDED A PERSONAL INVITATION TO VISIT THE SITE, AND HE
WAS WELL AWARE OF THE PROBLEMS THE BOARD HAS HAD IN THE PAST — THE
INTENT WAS DIFFERENT FROM THE BEGINNING WITH TREASURE COAST UTILITIES.
WILLIAM KOOLAGE, INTERESTED CITIZEN, ASKED IF THE BOARD
WAS INTENDING TO HAVE FURTHER INPUT ON THIS MATTER.
CHAIRMAN LYONS RESPONDED AFFIRMATIVELY.
MR.-KOOLAGE STATED THAT, NO DOUBT, THE COUNTY WAS GOING TO
BE IN THE BUSINESS OF WATER AND SEWER, AND SUGGESTED A LEASE AGREEMENT
TO HOLD OVER UNTIL THE TIME THE SYSTEM COULD BE A COUNTYWIDE SYSTEM.
HE FELT THE BOARD MUST LOOK, NOT TO PUT THIS SYSTEM IN OTHER HANDS,
BUT AT A LEASE AGREEMENT AS AN ALTERNATIVE.
MR. AIELLO INTERJECTED THAT DEVELOPERS HAVE A RIGHT TO
TRANSFER THEIR FRANCHISE. HE ADVISED THAT HE WOULD, AT A PUBLIC
HEARING, PRESENT WHATEVER FINANCIAL INFORMATION WAS NEEDED..
.JORGE GONZALEZ, REPRESENTING THE MOORINGS, CAME BEFORE
THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THE MOORINGS HAS EXISTED FOR OVER 25 YEARS
IN THE COUNTY AS A PROPERTY OWNER, AS A DEVELOPER FOR ABOUT 13 YEARS,
AND THEIR FRANCHISE WAS OBTAINED IN 1973, HE STATED THAT THE MOORINGS
HAS KNOWN MR, AIELLO FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS AND HAD WORKED WITH HIM
FOR OVER FOUR YEARS. HE CONTINUED THAT THEIR WORKING RELATIONSHIP
HAD BEEN SATISFACTORY, THEY HAD PROVED TO BE EXTREMELY KNOWLEDGEABLE,
HAD GREAT INTEGRITY, AND THE MOORINGS THOUGHT IT WOULD BE GOOD TO
GRADUALLY DEVELOP THE TRANSFER OF THE SYSTEM WITH THEM. MR. GONZALEZ
NOTED THAT THE POSITION OF THE MOORINGS WAS TO RECOMMEND THEM. HE
WANTED THE BOARD TO BEAR IN MIND THAT IF THE BOARD, AS WELL AS THE
TAXPAYERS WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS TRANSFER, THE MOORINGS WERE MORE
CONCERNED THAN ANYBODY.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER AGAIN WONDERED WHY A CONTRACT COULD
NOT BE DRAWN UP BETWEEN HUTCHINSON UTILITIES AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
A BIT OF DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT
THE PROPERTY OWNERS DID NOT ISSUE THE FRANCHISE, AND THEY DO NOT HAVE
THAT RIGHT.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADVERTISING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING FOR AUGUST 19, 1981 ON THE TRANSFER PROPOSAL OF THE MOORINGS
SEWER SYSTEM FRANCHISE.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK ADVISED THAT HE WOULD DEVELOP THE
TWO ALTERNATIVES: IF THE COUNTY WOULD GET INVOLVED, OR IF HUTCHINSON
UTILITIES WOULD TAKE OVER THE SYSTEM.
ADDITIONAL AGENDA ITEM
CHAIRMAN LYONS REQUESTED ADDING AN ITEM REGARDING WATER AND
SEWER ON THE NORTH BEACH.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ADDING THIS EMERGENCY ITEM
TO THE AGENDA.
CHAIRMAN LYONS ANNOUNCED THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR .JONES
INTERCABLE WILL BE CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 15, 1981 AT 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M.
AT THE SEBASTIAN COMMUNITY CENTER.
k
BOOK
JUL 151991 13
L-
6 PAGE 835
J U L 151981
970 M -MIN -MR -1001606 3V
$136
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
HAD DECIDED NOT TO PURSUE AN INTERIM REZONING OF THE NORTH BEACH,
AND ASKED WHAT THE BOARD WANTED TO DO ON THE MATTER.
SOME DISCUSSION FOLLOWED,
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED:TO CANCEL ACTION TO REZONE THE
NORTH BEACH AREA AND WITHDREW ACTION TO ADVERTISE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.
WATER SHORTAGE
CHAIRMAN LYONS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM THE
ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT DATED JULY 101 1981:
....
9tJO04NS_RIVER '+
July 10, 1981
POST OFFICE BOX 1429 • PALATKA, FLORIDA 32077
9041328-8321
a
Re: Declaration of Water Shortage within the
St. Johns River Water Management District
with Mandatary Water Conservation Measures
Gentlemen:
As you may be aware, on May 13, 1981, the Governing Board
of the St. Johns River Water Management District declared a
water shortage throughout its nineteen -county area. Since
that time, rainfall has been very low compared to normal years,
surface water conditions have been stressed, and ground water
levels throughout much of the District have been falling.
Also chloride levels have been increasing throughout parts of
the District, particularly east of the St. Johns River.
Because the voluntary measures have been ineffective in
protecting the water resources of the District from further harm,
the Governing Board of the St. Johns River Water Management District
has enacted mandatory measures in the following areas throughout
the District: Putnam County east of the St. Johns River; Duval
County southeast of the St. Johns River; Osceola and Okeechobee
Counties within the boundaries of the St. Johns River Water
Management District; St. Johns; and the entire counties of Flagler;
Volusia; Seminole; Brevard; and Indian River. A copy of the
Governing Board's Order dated July 8, 1981 is enclosed for your
reference.
Basically, the Order mandates a 151 reduction in water use
within the above-described area of the District. This is ac-
complished by a 150 reduction on the -part of public water suppliers
utilizing whatever measures they deem appropriate or measures
specified in the Order if the earlier measures fail. In addition,
.irrigators are to reduce their water use by a like amount as
compared to the water use during the two-week period prior to
April 30, 1981. Measures for achieving this 15% reduction are
further specified in the Order. Lawn irrigation -is -not allowed
between the hours of 9:0.0 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Industrial, processing,
commercial, and mining users as well as self -supplied water users
within the mandatory area are also ordered to reduce water use by
15% based upon the same period.-
Since
eriod.-
Since compliance with this Order may effectively modify
the provisions of your permit until the declaration is rescinded,
we are sending you a copy of this letter along with the Order for
your information. Please let us know if you have any questions
or whether we can provide further information to assist you.
Sincerely yours,
Robert J. Moresi, Director
Department of Resource Management
CHAIRMAN LYONS REQUESTED THAT THE PRESS HELP ALL THEY CAN
TO GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS TO THE PUBLIC TO CONSERVE WATER.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER THOUGHT IT IRONIC THAT THE BOARD IS
IN THE MIDST OF GOING INTO THE WATER BUSINESS IN THE MIDDLE OF A
DECLARATION OF WATER SHORTAGE. HE FELT WE MUST ALL PLAN FOR THE
WORST POSSIBLE WATER CONDITION.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED THAT THE BOARD NEEDS TO URGE
CITIZENS OF THE COUNTY TO ADHERE TO THE ORDER OF THE WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT BY CUTTING THE USE OF WATER BY 15%.
LENGTHY DISCUSSION FOLLOWED.
CHAIRMAN LYONS SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE AN AD
OF APPROPRIATE SIZE INDICATING TO THE PUBLIC THAT THERE IS A WATER
SHORTAGE.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COM-
MISSIONER FLETCHER, THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TO DRAFT AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLICATION.
NEWSMAN MARK WEINBERG, OF WTTB, COMMENTED THAT THE NEWS
MEDIA WAS HAPPY TO DO THEIR PART IN RUNNING ANNOUNCEMENTS AND DOING
NEWS STORIES ABOUT THE SITUATION.
BOOK ;A
46 - fi� '37 ^'
. �
JUL 151991 .,
15
II�
JUL 151981 - -
i
,JOHN MORRISON, INTERESTED CITIZEN, SPOKE TO THE BOARD ABOUT
HOW THE CITRUS GROWERS WERE GRAVELY CONCERNED ABOUT THE ADEQUACY OF
WATER OVER THE YEARS, AND THAT THE UNUSUAL WEATHER WE WERE NOW
EXPERIENCING WAS NOT JUST A PASSING PHENOMENON.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX
IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CHAIRMAN LYONS BRIEFLY REVIEWED WITH THE BOARD THE FACTS
BROUGHT OUT AT THE JULY STH WORKSHOP MEETING BY .JOHN THOMAS, OF THE
STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HE POINTED OUT THAT
A SPECIAL SESSION MIGHT BE HELD IN ORDER TO CONSIDER A LOCAL
OPTION SALES TAX, THE CHAIRMAN COMMENTED THAT THE STATE ASSOCIATION
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FAVOR THE I/24 LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX GOING
TO THE COUNTY AND THAT THERE BE NO TAKE -BACKS OF THE GASOLINE TAX.
CHAIRMAN LYONS NOTED HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS OPTION MADE AVAILABLE
SO THAT TAX CAN BE COLLECTED FROM THE WHOLE COUNTY, INCLUDING THE
TOURISTS. HE SUGGESTED THE BOARD WRITING TO STATE SENATOR TOM;LEWIS
WITH THEIR THOUGHTS ON THE MATTER.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE COMMENTED THAT HE COULD ADD TO THE
OPTIONS ALREADY SUGGESTED AND WAS DISTURBED THAT THE STATE WAS PUTTING
RESTRICTIONS ON IT AND TELLING THE COUNTY HOW THEY SHOULD USE THE
TAX. HE ALSO FELT THE STATE SHOULD PAY FOR THE STATE MANDATED PROGRAMS.
AFTER MUCH DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED(THAT EACH COMMISSIONER
WOULD RESPOND TO SENATOR LEWIS AS TO THE DIFFERENT AVENUES AVAILABLE
FOR THE LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX.
CHAIRMAN LYONS DISCUSSED THE MATTER BRIEFLY WITH THE BOARD
AND SUGGESTED THAT THE THREE DEVELOPERS IN THE NORTH BEACH, WHO ARE
PLANNING TO INSTALL PACKAGE PLANTS IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT, GET TOGETHER
AND CONSOLIDATE THEIR EFFORTS.
DISCUSSION ENSUED. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT COMMISSIONER
SCURLOCK, THE ATTORNEY AND THE ADMINISTRATOR WORK IN CONJUNCTION WITH
THE DEVELOPERS TO CONSOLIDATE THE SEWER AND WATER SYSTEMS AND TO
UTILIZE THE 6iABASSO BRIDGE WATER LINE.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — RESOLUTION 81-44
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK REVIEWED THE MATTER OF CONSIDERING
AN INDUSTRIAL`DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND SAW NO PROBLEM WITH THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AUTHORITY — HE BELIEVED THE BOARD NEEDED TO MOVE
FORWARD IN THIS FASHION.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COM—
MISSIONER BIRD, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 81-44 APPROVING AN INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO BE FORMED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE BOARD MUST FIND THAT A
NEED EXISTS FOR SUCH AN AUTHORITY TO PROMOTE THE DEVELOPMENT AND
FINANCING OF INDUSTRY.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER THOUGHT THE BOARD HAD PLENTY TO DO
WITHOUT TAKING ON THIS EXTRA JOB AND PLANNED TO VOTE AGAINST THE
AUTHORITY, WITH NO REFERENCE TO RAMPMASTER. HE STATED THAT THIS
WAS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF GOVERNMENT GETTING INVOLVED.
CHRIS WHEELER, ATTORNEY FOR RAMPMASTER, INC., CAME BEFORE
THE BOARD AND STATED THAT THE NEXT STEP WOULD BE AN INDUCEMENT
RESOLUTION THAT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ATTORNEY COLLINS, AND WOULD LIKE
THE BOARD TO CONSIDER THAT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
LENGTHY DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION
AND THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT GIVEN TO THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION.
SINCE THE ATTORNEY FELT SEVERAL ITEMS SHOULD BE MORE SPECIFIC, IT
WAS DETERMINED MORE INFORMATION WAS NEEDED BEFORE SIGNING THE PROPOSED
RESOLUTION.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED 4 TO 1, WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
boo46 PAGE 839
JUL 151981
17
r JUL 15191
RESOLUTION No. 81-44
enc ;x.15 pnp 840
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY; DECLARING A NEED
FOR THE AUTHORITY TO FUNCTION WITHIN INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY ON MOTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS-
SIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; DESIGNATING MEMBERS
OF THE AUTHORITY, APPOINTING MEMBERS BY DISTRICT;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 159, Parts 2 and 3, Florida Statutes,
as amended, and other applicable laws.
SECTION 2,. It is hereby found, ascertained, determined
and declared that on the Commission's own motion a need exists
within Indian River County for an Industrial Development Authority
to promote the development and financing of industry in the County.
SECTION 3. The Board of County Commissioners designates the
Board as the Indian River County Industrial Development Authority
with the Commissioner from District 1 initially serving a term of
one (1) year, the Commissioner from District 2 serving a term of
two (2) years, the Commissioner from District 3 serving a term of
three (3) years and the Commissioners from Districts 4 and 5,
serving terms of four (4) years. Thereafter terms will be for
four (4) years each. The Authority shall follow procedural
requirements of Chapter 159 Florida Statutes (1979).
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect as provided
by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July , 1981.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Freda WrightU
Clerk of Circuit Court
M« m m
J. B. NORTON, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, APPROACHED THE BOARD
AND DISCUSSED THE SITE FOR RAMPMASTER, INC. IN THE COUNTY, AND STATED
THAT THERE WAS NO WATER AVAILABLE OUT IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA.
CHAIRMAN LYONS STRESSED THAT THE WORDS IN THE PROPOSED
RESOLUTION HAVE TO BE WORDS THE BOARD CAN LIVE WITH - THAT IS ALL
THEY WERE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH. SINCE THE ATTORNEY HAS RAISED SEVERAL
QUESTIONS ON COMMITMENTS THAT ARE IN THE RESOLUTION AND AGREEMENT,
HE FELT IT SHOULD BE REWORDED SO THAT THE COMMISSIONERS WOULD FEEL
COMFORTABLE SIGNING THE DOCUMENTS,
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT SEVERAL BOARD
MEMBERS TRAVEL TO RAMPMASTERS, INC. IN FORT LAUDERDALE TO SEE EXACTLY
WHAT TYPE OF INDUSTRY THEY HAVE.
COMMISSIONER BIRD STATED THAT HE AND ASSISTANT COUNTY
ATTORNEY HOULIHAN WOULD MEET WITH THE PEOPLE FROM RAMPMASTERS, INC.
IN ORDER TO POLISH UP THE RESOLUTION AND AGREEMENT, AND BRING IT
BACK TO THE BOARD FOR REVIEW.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER BIRD, TO APPROVE OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL FOR COMMISSIONERS WHO
WISH TO VISIT RAMPMASTERS, INC. IN FORT LAUDERDALE.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED WITH'A VOTE OF 4 TO 1, WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN
OPPOSITION.
GIFFORD WATER
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK BRIEFLY REPORT ON THE RECENT MEETING
OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR GIFFORD WATER & SEWER. HE POINTED OUT THAT
THEY ARE TRYING TO GET AS MANY PEOPLE ON THE SYSTEM AS POSSIBLE, AND
SPOKE OF THE PROBLEM OF COLLECTING THE ACCOUNTS THAT ARE IN ARREARS.
HE COMMENTED THAT PROCEDURES WILL BE TAKEN BY THE ATTORNEY AND
UTILITIES DIRECTOR LINER TO DEVELOP A METHOD TO COLLECT THE DELINQUENT
ACCOUNTS.
BOON 46 .PAGE 841
JUL 15 1991 19
c
JUL 15 BOQK �-��. ��. `
19 1 P,,,, 842
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT
COMMISSIONER BIRD SPOKE TO THE BOARD ABOUT VISITING 36
PARKS AND RECREATION SITES LAST THURSDAY. HE COMPLIMENTED PARK
SUPERINTENDENT BILL COOK ON THE FINE JOB HE DID IN HANDLING THE ENTIRE
ITINERARY. COMMISSIONER BIRD COMMENTED THAT ROUND ISLAND PARK AND THE
TRACKING STATION WERE NOT VISITED, AS MANY IN THE PARTY HAD BEEN
THERE RECENTLY.- HE SPOKE OF HOW IMPRESSED HE WAS BY THE COUNTY -
MAINTAINED PARKS - THEY WERE FRESHLY MOWED AND HE SAW NO EVIDENCE
OF ANY TRASH PROBLEM. ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN, HE NOTED IT
WAS OBVIOUS THAT THE COUNTY IS LACKING IN FACILITIES SUCH AS RESTROOMS
AND PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT. ALL OF THIS INFORMATION WILL BE HELPFUL
IN DEVELOPING A MASTER PLAN, WHICH WILL BE DISCUSSED AT THE NEXT
MEETING. COMMISSIONER BIRD ADVISED THAT ENGINEER JIM DAVIS WILL
BEGIN WORKING ON A GRANT APPLICATION BECAUSE OF ITS TECHNICAL NATURE.
CHAIRMAN LYONS REPORTED THAT HE ,MET..WITH MAYOR NdLIAN ALONG
WITH THE ADMINISTRATOR AND BILL COOK AT THE TRACKING STATION PARK
AND COULD NOT FIND THE TRASH THAT WAS REPORTED ON THE BEACH. HE DID
SUGGEST THAT SINCE THERE IS NO LIFEGUARD ON DUTY IN THIS AREA, -THE
COUNTY SHOULD -PUT UP A SIGN FOR PEOPLE TO SWIM AT THEIR OWN RISK.
HE THEN ASKED COMMISSIONER BIRD TO LOOK INTO THE MATTER OF ADEQUATE
PARKING AT WABASSO BEACH.
COMMISSIONER BIRD ALSO REPORTED THAT ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS
THAT THE BOARD RECENTLY AUTHORIZED FOR THE GIFFORD PARK HAVE ALL BEEN
COMPLETED.
THE BOARD EXPRESSED APPRECIATION FOR ALL THAT HAS BEEN DONE.
27DINATION OF TRANSPORTATION OF DISADVANTAGED
THE BOARD NEXT REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM FROM
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON:
TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: July 8, 1981 FILE:
Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT.- Coordination of Transportation
Disadvantaged Services
FROM:REFERENCES: Board meeting of May 20, 1981
Pde i 1 PJeI son
County Administrator
At the above referenced meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, the
Commission directed the Administration to contact the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council to determine if that body would be interested in development
of a Transportation Disadvantaged Plan for Indian River County. The Adminis-
tration was also requested to contact the Department of Transportation to deter-
mineif a waiver of the Competitive Negotiation Act procedures would be applicable
for preparation of a Transportation Disadvantaged plan.
1. Description and Conditions
The Administration has received responses -from both DOT acid the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council to our inquiries made as a result of the
May 20th Board action. Unfortunately, both responses a -re in the negative.
The DOT believes the Competitive Consultant Act procedures must be followed
and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council declines to undertake pre-
paration of the plan.
Background
At its' meeting of October 22, 1980, the Board of.County Commissioners of
Indian River County agreed to accept the planning responsibility for pre-
.paration of a "Transportation for the Disadvantaged" plan on the basis that
it be activated at such time as the County receives funds for the planning
process through DOT. DOT has since made -available a planning grant in the
amount of $8,000. for the County to undertake this project.. -However, at its'
meeting of May 6, and May 20, 1981, the Board deferred action relative
to initiation of plan. preparation.
2.' Alternatives S Analysis
Basi-cally, the Board of County Commissioners has two alternatives presently
available. First, the Board may proceed with -the selection of a consultant
to prepare the transportation plan -as originally recommended by -the Administration
in May. This alternative would require that an RFP seeking qualifications of
interested and available planning consultants be prepared and distributed, and
that the Competitive negotiation process be followed. This action would further
require that the Board accept the grant offer in the amount of $8,000. from.DOT,
and authorize the Chairman's signature.
The second alternative available would be for the Board of County -
Commissioners to withdraw its' acceptance of the planning responsib-
ility which the previous Board accepted in Ocotber of 1930. Should
this action be pursued, a motion to that effect by the Board would be
appropriate with subsequent notification to DOT advising of the Board's
action. Should this occur, it would t.�en become the repsonsibility of
the Department of Transportation to develop a Transportation Disadvantaged
Pian for Indian River County.
Boat 6 .PAGE 843
JUL 151981 21 f W
Boo
84 4
The intent of the Transportation Disadvantaged planning process is to provide
a coordinated approach to the provision of transportation services for var-
ious disadvantaged eiements of the community. At present, there are several
agencies in Indian River County receiving Federal and/or State funds to provide
some form of transportation disadvantaged services. The intent of the plan-
ning -process is to provide a coordinated approach to service delivery of -this
type, to eliminate duplication of services between.the several agencies, and
possibly the ultimate designation of a uniformed service provider for trans-
portation services.
3. Recommendation & Funding
The Administration again recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
continue with the planning responsibility originally accepted in October of
1980. At that time, the Board indic2ted-its willingness to proceed if DOT
made funds available. DOT has now made those funds available, alternatives
have been explored and found unworkable, and the moment of decision appears
to be at hand. Accordingly, the Administration recommends the Board of County
Commissioners authorize and direct the following actions by the Administration:
1. Prepare and distribute RFP for a consultant to prepare
Transportation Disadvantaged plan for Indian River County.
The Administration to review proposals, prepare a short list,
conduct necessary interviews and submit recommended ranking
of top three firms to the Board of County Commissioners.
Z. Authorize execution of" the grant agreement in the amount of
$8,000.00 as offered by the Florida Department of Transportation.
Should there be any further questions regarding this matter, or should any
additional information be desired, please advise.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE,, SECONDED BY COM—
MISSIONER BIRD, TO AUTHORIZE THE HIRING OF A CONSULTANT, FOR AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $8,000, TO PREPARE A TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED
PLAN FOR THE COUNTY.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER FELT THE BOARD WAS BEING FORCED TO
6PEND $8,000 AND FELT THERE WAS NO NEED FOR THIS.
THE CHAIRMAN 'CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED 4 TO 1, WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS -
SIGNER BIRD TO AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE GRANT AGREEMENT
IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,000 OFFERED BY THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED 4 TO 1, WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
CHANGE ORDER #3,- GIFFORD AREA IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED CHANGE ORDER #3 FOR PHASE II
GIFFORD AREA IMPROVEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF THE
CHAIRMAN.
JUL 15 1991 23
eooK46 Pnre 84.5 ..
2
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ORM APPROVED OM9 No.40-tta007 '"-
Form FmHA 424-7 FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION ORDER NO.
(Rev. 6-11-80) 3
- CONTRACT CHARGE ORDER DATE
- July 8 1981
Phase II - Gifford Area Improvements tiT RT EFlorida
CONTRACT FOR COUNTY
_Indian River County Indian River
OWNER
Drivewa s Inc
fConuecro,)
You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications:
Description of Changes DECREASE INCREASE
(Supplemental Plans and Specifications Attached) in Contract Price in Contract Price
Provide a flow regulator box capable of S
handling surge flows to the sewage treatment
planet, as described in the construction plans
and drawings. 1,700.00
Bond Expense @ 3% 51.00
+ TOTALS S -------
NET
.__„ _.. __..__„ -- _____ NET CHANGE 1N CONTRACT PRICE $ .__ _.......... _.._....___„ __.._.._.�sJ.� e.QQ„.._„_..
JUSTIFICATION:. In an effort to provide a constant flow into the sewage treatment plant,
thus providing a more efficient treatment process, a flow regulator box should be
installed. In conjunction with the surge tanks and pumps, the regulator box will
�ulate"`the fluctuating incoming flow to the design flow of the treatment plant.
The amount of the Contract will be OWYM (Increased) By The Sum Of: One thousand seven hundred
fifty-one and 00/100------------------------------------- Dollars (S 1,751.00 ).
The Contract Total Including this and previous Change Orders Will Be: Three hundred seventy—three
thousand nine hundred and 50/100 --------------------------- Dollars($ 373,900.5t'i ).
The Contract Period Provided for Completion Will Be MMX&U9WUXa (Unchanged): —O® Days
This docu r ill become a su plement to the contract and all provisions will epply hereto. / J
Requested
--- j' (Owner) f JD to)
Recommended 1/
,r (Owner's Archite�t/Engineer) (Da )
Accepted
(contractor) (Dura)
Approved By FmHA
(Name and Title) (Dare)
Tnls information will be user as record of any rkunrber Cop4as Yaquir�E: 4 No further nNomlei or other tau.a
my be paid Cat andW this
ensu" to the original construction contract. program+ unwrt s this mpois completod and filed as NQUI ed by
Tiffm to coemptata: 20 rnln. anlsting taw and regulatt®ns (7 C.F.R. Part 1924).
eu.a.(aao:> t401rtaf• Position 6 FmHA 424-7(Rev.6-11.80) ”.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RECESSED AT 12:00 O'CLOCK
NOON FOR LUNCH.
THE BOARD OF COUNT'S COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECONVENED
AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEtIBERS PRESENT, AND DEPUTY
CLERK VIRGINIA HARGREAVES TOOK OVER FROM DEPUTY CLERK .JANICE
CALDWELL FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING,
LIC HEARING_. REZONING DORAN PROPERTY NEAR FLORAVON SHORES —
THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY
CLERK READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED,
TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS- ®URNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Reach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STA -FE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a 17)
in the matter of
in the I Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of T T-�
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this "'y
of A.D.. 1
n 11 % l
�
(SEAL)
Manager)
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian f(i er County, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN that the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, is reviewing the feasibility of
making the following changes and additions to
the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County,
Florida. These changes are: 1
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property situated
in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit
18 ACRES MORE OR LESS OF LAND ON
THE East SIDE OF U.S. NO. 1 ABUTTING
THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF
FLORAVON SHORES SUBDIVISION, JUST"
BELOW. 110th STREET, HAVING 660 FEET
OF FRONTAGE ON U.S. NO. 1; be changed
from C -IA Restricted Commercial District and
R-3 Multiple Family District (15 Units -Ac.) to
R-28 Multiple Family District (8 Units -Ac.).
Said land being.approximately 1,300 feet
deep as measured on a straight line from U.S.
No. 1 and lying Easterly of U.S. No. 1 in
Government Lots 3 and 4, Section 8, Township j
31 South, Range 39 East, bounded on the North
by the south line of Floravon Shores Sub-
division as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 78 of
the Public Records of Indian Rivet County, ;
Florida, and bounded on the South by the North
right-of-way line. of State Road Department
Lateral Ditch No. 5 (Section No: 8801-(110-Z07),
All the above situate in Indian River County,
Florida, and containing 18 acres, more or less.
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
Board of County Commissioners in the Council
Chamber of the City Hall, Vero Beach,
Florida, on ,Wednesday, July., 1
75981, at 1:30
p.m.
*- . ;.
If any person decides to appeal any decision
made on the above matter, he will need a
record of the proceedings, and for such pur-
poses, he may need to insure that a verbatim
record of the proceedings is made, which in-
cludes testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is based.
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
By: Patrick B. Lyons,_,Chairman
May26, 28, 1981. _
NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO ALL THE AFFECTED
PROPERTY OWNERS BY FREDA WRIGHT, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT, AS REQUIRED
BY FLORIDA STATUTE I25.66, AND COPIES OF SAME ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK.
at
6001(4 PAQ 84 t
F,
J U L 151981
SENIOR PLANNER ART CHALLACOMBE REVIEWED THE PLANNING STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATION, AS FOLLOWS:
TO" Neil Nelson
County Administrator
FROM: avi d M. Re err
Planning and Zoning Director
DATE: July 15, 1981 FILE: ZC 80-28-448
SUBJECT: County initiated rezoning from C -1A
and R-3 to R -2B
REFERENCES:
It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by
the Board of County Commissioners.
1. Description and Conditions
The Board of County Commissioners initiated rezoning procedures to rezone approximately
18 acres from C -1A Restricted Commercial and R-3 Multi -Family Residential (15 units/
acre) to R -2B Multi -Family Residential (8.1 units/acre). Subject property is located
on the east side of U.S. #1, south of 110th Street directly adjacent to the southern
boundary of Floravon Shores Subdivision and extends from U.S. #1 to the Indian River.
The site presently contains 9 occupied mobile home units -grouped in the northwest -
section of the subject property along -U.S. #1. The remainder of the property is vacant
with marl drives. There is a dilapidated dock on the Indian River which is part of the
R-3 parcel. The area is in the 100 -year flood plain.
2. Alternatives and Analysis
A) Approve rezoning of the entire 18 acre parcel from C -1A and R-3 to R -2B Multi -
Family (8.1 units/acre). Thi -s would allow -a maximum of 146 units for the entire parcel.
It is recognized that there is an excessive amount of commercial districts in this
area, thus staff does not object to down zoning the subject property._ In keeping with
existing zoning configuration and carrying capacity -of the land, R -2B Multi -Family
Residential (8.1 units/acre) would allow an appropriate density level. -
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended rezoning 8.1 acres from C -1A Com-
mercial to R -2B Multi -Family Residential. The Board of County Commissioners initiated
action to rezone the entire parcel to R-2 Multi -Family Resi-dential on May 22, 1981.
B) Discontinue rezoning procedures, leaving the existing zoning configuration
intact. The R-3 portion will allow a gross density of 15 units/acre with a maximum
total of 120 units. There would remain 8.1 acres of C -1A property.
3. Recommendation
A. That the F;,&-L'ire 18 -acre parcel be rezoned from C -1A and R-3 to R -2B Multi -
Family ",csidential (8.1- units/acre).
B. That the Ordinance effecting rezoning be adopted.
W,
THE HISTORY OF THE REZONING WAS REVIEWED BRIEFLY, AND IT
WAS NOTED THAT AT THE FIRST HEARING, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REJECTED THE PLANNING R ZONING COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION TO REZONE THE
C -IA PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO R -2B AND INSTEAD INITIATED A
NEW HEARING ON REZONING THE ENTIRE PROPERTY, BOTH THE C -IA AND R-3
PARCELS, TO R -2B,
CHAIRMAN LYONS ASKED THAT A LETTER FROM FRED OETZEL, REPRE-
SENTING FLORAVON SHORES PROPERTY OWNERS, PROTESTING A REZONING AT ANY-
THING OVER C UNITS PER ACRE, BE MADE PART OF THE RECORD, AS FOLLOWS:
6645 i a� Lie
T oAavon Shoanu
Sem-tan, 7.1'a. .32958
�a.. Y % 1981
Pbt- 1�mtn s CAai tman
ln&t 1�t R Cour`# CommL&'�on�rr�s
V -,,w Beath, Fla. 32960
y o
L �!. �A VO r•�;•�Ls
AwA lk. L ons: !n Ike: on A-(�t 15th aeaw&inq Z011lS( ,44D LoNAiD
/Cil fao;2ea tis ��.irz� Fast o_771 and Sot/,M
7LOMM 910/vs
Na.. .th.e .conc�l home cuneaz o,p 7LOROGN 9109t�S ye l &tz 1wwpeA4 Z/wu/ fie.
&emceed -in accAaclance mr %h .the Lad 1144 1.&a and .in rzrL&lvnancc uws Jh t1i e durur o�
ex. 6t&Z9 AMM.
i .i tlz the c°rr fzPete Qaclz oy yar_ia!' ' ' , -Lha an_w and .the. veV d ngeaoaa b",&&
.ai. iLatwn, tae Aaal Aat &e-zontng o y wu�tliinq om& 6 uru-L pea arw coaU Ae
hazarulou a to the uho.Qe a17ea.
1eec,4&r4.. auL�i„u t ted,
74.ed 7C1atxee", aj�ofw-dui you �1;'oJrrz:,on Show %ao� Ch.vterc a
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
ATTORNEY STEVE HENDERSON, REPRESENTING THE DORANS, OWNERS
OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, STATED THAT THEY WOULD LIKE THE BOARD TO
RECONSIDER THEIR PREVIOUS ACTION AND REZONE JUST THE COMMERCIAL AREA
INTO R -2B, ALLOWING A DEVELOPMENT AT THE DENSITIES ORIGINALLY PRO-
JUL
RO-
JUL 151991 EOOK 46 PACE 849
27
JUL 151981 00 r 8L
POSED. IF THE BOARD IS DISINCLINED TO DOING THAT AND THE PROPERTY
WERE TO BE LEFT AS IT IS, THEY WOULD MAINTAIN THAT PART OF THE C -IA
COULD BE DEVELOPED INTO RESIDENTIAL USE AT A FAIRLY HIGH DENSITY.
THIS WOULD NOT BE CONSISTENT WITH GOOD PLANNING, HOWEVER, AND THEY
WOULD PREFER THE R -2B ZONING AT g UNITS PER ACRE RATHER THAN HAVE ANY
FURTHER DELAYS.
FRED OETZEL CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING THE FLORAVON
SHORES PROPERTY OWNERS. HE EMPHASIZED THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE WATER
SITUATION, THE -DANGERS THAT EXIST -OF SALT WATER INTRUSION, AND THE
FACT THAT THIS AREA DOES NOT HAVE THE FACILITIES TO PROMOTE GREAT
GROWTH AT THIS TIME, AS THE REASONS THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS
PROPERTY ZONED TO ALLOW NO MORE THAN 6 UNITS PER ACRE; IN ADDITION,
THIS WOULD BE MORE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROPOSED MASTER PLAN,
WHICH IS COMING UP FOR APPROVAL SOON.
CHAIRMAN LYONS INQUIRED ABOUT THE WATER SOURCE FOR THE PRO-
POSED SUBDIVISION.
ATTORNEY HENDERSON REPORTED THAT THERE HAVE BEEN ON=GOING
DISCUSSIONS WITH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AS TO THE POSSIBILITY
OF OBTAINING WATER FROM THEM, BUT HE FELT THAT EVENTUALLY THEY. PROBABLY
WOULD HAVE A DEEP WATER AQUIFER SYSTEM, HE POINTED OUT THAT THESE
ARE SITE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS AND ANY WATER SUPPLY WOULD HAVE TO BE
FRANCHISED BY THE COUNTY AND REGULATED BY ST. .JOHNS RIVER WATER
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. MR. HENDERSON FURTHER NOTED THAT THE RESIDENTS
OF FLORAVON SHORES FIRST INDICATED PUBLICLY THAT THEY WOULD BE
SATISFIED WITH B UNITS PER ACRE, BUT THEY LATER OBJECTED BECAUSE
THEY HAD THOUGHT IT WOULD BE S FOR THE ENTIRE PARCEL; NOW THEY ARE
,OPOSING 6. THIS WOULD REQUIRE A DRASTIC CHANGE IN THE PLANS FOR
THE PROPERTY, AND HIS CLIENTS FEEL IT WOULD NOT RESULT IN A MARKET-
ABLE PRODUCT.
DONALD DORAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE DOES HAVE A LETTER
FROM GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION STATING THAT DURING THE SECOND
QUARTER OF 19082 THEY ARE EXPANDING THEIR WATER FACILITIES IN THE
HIGHLANDS AREA AND FEEL THAT AT THAT TIME THEY PROBABLY WOULD HAVE
ADEQUATE FACILITIES TO SUPPLY HIS PROJECT WITH WATER. THIS DOES NOT
INCLUDE SEWER.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER INQUIRED ABOUT ANY PLANS FOR
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN. MR. DORAN STATED THEY CON-
SIDERED THAT, BUT THEY ARE NOT CONTIGUOUS.
No ONE FURTHER WISHED TO BE HEARD, AND ON MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE
BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT THERE HAS BEEN A
GOOD BIT OF CONFUSION ABOUT THE DENSITIES AND PORTIONS OF THE
PROPERTY INVOLVED, AND THE BOARD HAS BEEN TRYING TO WORK OUT SOME-
THING EQUITABLE FOR BOTH PARTIES. HE POINTED OUT THAT WE HAVE COME
DOWN FROM A COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION TO AN OVERALL DENSITY OF R-213,
WHICH HE FEELS IS THE BEST COMPROMISE. IF THERE ARE SPECIFIC PROBL="'S
WITH WATER AND SEWER, THE BOARD CAN ADDRESS THAT IMPACT AT THE TIME
THE APPLICANT COMES IN FOR A FRANCHISE. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED
THAT HE PLANNED TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER CONCURRED BASICALLY WITH COMMISSIONER
SCURLOCK. HE APPRECIATED THE CONCERN OF THE FLORAVON SHORES PROPERTY
OWNERS REGARDING WATER AND ENCOURAGED THEM TO STAY TUNED INTO THE
SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. HE DID NOT WISH THIS REZONING TO SET A
PRECEDENT, HOWEVER, REGARDING THE NUMBER OF UNITS PER ACRE IN THIS
AREA.
CHAIRMAN LYONS ALSO BELIEVED THIS IS THE BEST COMPROMISE AND
NOTED THAT IN REGARD TO THE WATER SITUATION, THEY HAVE TO GET PERMITS
FROM THE ST. .JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WHO ARE THE REAL
EXPERTS.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT IF WE WERE TO DENY THE
REZONING, THE APPLICANT WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO GO IN AT 15 UNITS PER
ACRE AND TO PUT IN A WATER SYSTEM WHICH WE WOULD HAVE TO ADDRESS AT
THE SAME TIME.
COMMISSIONER BIRD NOTED THAT REZONING TO R-213 ELIMINATES
MOST OF THE COMMERCIAL AS WELL AS THE MOBILE HOMES AND THE PRESENT
R-3, WHICH CUTS THE DENSITY DOWN A GREAT DEAL. HE FELT THIS REPRESENTS
A REASONABLE COMPROMISE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 81-25, REZONING THE
BOOK 46 PAGE 851
JUL 151991 29 ;:a
JUL 151981 ` 852
18 ACRES MORE OR LESS OF LAND ON THE EAST SIDE OF U.S. N0. 1
ABUTTING THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE OF FLORAVON SHORES SUBDIVISION,
JUST BELOW 110TH STREET, HAVING 660 FEET OF FRONTAGE ON U.S N0, 1,
FROM C -1A AND R-3 TO R -LB AS INITIATED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS.
ORDINANCE NO. 81-25
WHEREAS, the Board of County Coiiimissioners of Indian River;
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto
held a public hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian
River County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended
as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in -order that the
following described property situated in I.ndian River
County, Florida, to -wit:
Said land being approximately 1300 feet deep as measured
on a straight line from U.S. #1 and lying Easterly of
U.S. #1 in Government Lots 3 and 4, Section 8, Township 31
South, Range 39 East, bounded on the North by the South line of
Floravon Shores Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 4,
page 78, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida,
and bounded on the South by the North right-of-way line of
State Road Department Lateral Ditch No. 5 (Section No.
8801-(110-207). All the above situate in Indian River County,
Flor.ida and containing 18 acres more or less.
Be changed from C -1A Restricted Commercial District and R-3
Multiple Family District to R -2B Multiple Family District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and
described in said Zoning Regulations.
Thi s Ordi nance shal 1 take effect July 20, 1981.
30
ORDINANCE 81-26 - REZONING TO C -1A AS REQUESTED FOR INDIAN RIVER
FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN.
THE HOUR OF 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK
READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO—WIT:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
Vero Beach, Indian Rider County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a 4cea
in the matter of eL
i,I,�t 4, 4 V- 141 f &.'? „d' AtAe .
in the Court, was pub -
fished in said newspaper in the issues of TGtd:tg // /-2 - �T�Z
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this °z day of �+ A.D.
(Business an r)
(SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River CUnty, Florida)
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board
of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, is reviewing -the feasibility of
making the following changes and additions to
the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County,
Florida, which changes and additions are
substantially as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order
that the following described property,
SITUATED ON S.R. 60, EAST OF'KINGS
HIGHWAY AND WEST OF 43RD AVENUE, in
Indian River County, Florida, to -wit:
Part of the Northwest quarter of the South-
west quarter of Section 4, Township 33 South,
Range 39 East, beginning at a point on the
North line of said Southwest Quarter of said
Section 4 which point is 590.6' east of the North-
west corner of said Southwest quarter of said
Section 4; thence South parallel with the went
line of said Section 4,1311 feet to the northe -
line of the right-of-way of main canal, th< --
nRrthwesterly along the northerly line of
c ,nal right-of-way to a point 1331.2' due EaN; •,f
the West line of said Section 4; thence Norl:h
parallel with the West line of said Section 4,
1041.9' to the North line of the said Southwest
quarter, thence west along the north line of
said Southwest quarter of said Section 4,7411 to
beginning. EXCEPT, however, the right-of-
way for public roads, drainage canals, and
ditches as shown on the plat of said lands by
the part of the first part LESS the west 9.4' of
the above described property.
The above parcel situated in parts of Tracts
12 and 13, Section 4, Township 33 South, Range.
39 East, according to Plat Book 2; page 25, St.
Lucie County Public Records, Indian River
Farms Company , Subdivision. Said land.
situated in Indian River County, Florida.
Be changed from R-1 Residential District to
CAA Restricted Commercial District. -
A public hearing in relation thereto at which
parties in interest and citizens shall have an
opportunity to be heard, will be held by said
Board of County Commissioners in the Council
Chamber of the City Hall, Vero Beach,
Florida, on Wednesday, Jam -)5,,1981; at 1:30
P.M.
If any person decides to appeal any decision
made on the above matter, he will need a
record of the proceedings, and for such pur-
poses, he may need to insure that a verbatim
record of the proceedings is made, which in-
cludes testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is based..
Indian River County'
Board of County Commissioners
By: Patrick B. Lyons
Chairman
June 11, 12, 1981.
NOTICE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS SENT TO ALL THE AFFECTED
PROPERTY OWNERS BY FREDA WRIGHT, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT, AS REQUIRED
BY FLORIDA STATUTE 1251661 AND COPIES OF SAME ARE ON FILE .I N THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK.
BOOK - 46 PAGE 853
JUL 151981 -
31 _.
f1.
JUL 151981 BOOK 4854
SENIOR PLANNER ART CHALLACOMBE REVIEWED THE PLANNING SZTAFF`S
RECOMMENDATION, AS FOLLOWS:
TO: Neil Nelson DATE: July 15, 1981 FILE: ZC 81-13-451
County Administrator
SUBJECT: Indian River Federal Savings
FROM: David M Reve� REFERENCES:
Planning and Zoning Director
It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the
Board of County Commissioners.
1. Description and Conditions.
Applicant requests rezoning of approximately 19.5 acres, located on the south .side
of S.R. 60, 600 feet east of 58th Avenue, from R-1 Single Family District to C -1A
Restricted Commercial. The subject property is vacant, with heavy vegetation and has
approximately 660 feet fronting on S.R. 60. The adjacent property to the east con
tains groves, while the Main Relief Canal runs diagonally along the southern boundary
of the site. There is a single family residence west of the subject property,: -approx-
imately 350 feet south of S.R. 60. There is a single family residential development .
the north side of S.R. 60, along 56th Street. Approximately 2000 feet to the east, -
'he north side of S.. R. 60, is a commercial area containing a bank and an insurance
;ency. There is also a site plan for a proposed office building and a site plan
for a proposed pro shop/putting course, as well as a rezoning request for expansion
of that commercial district. The subject property is designated as commercial.in both
the existing and proposed Comprehensive Plan.
2. Alternatives and Analysis
A) Approve the rezoning of subject property from R-1 to C -1A. The Main Relief
Canal on the south side of subject property provides a permanent buffer. and boundary
for the existing agricultural/residential areas to the south. S.R. 60 has adequate
capacity to accomodate commercial uses; the configuration under single ownersErip would
allow design flexibility. The site is in an area which is anticipated to develop into
a commercial area. The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval
to rezone from R-1 Single Family to C -1A Restricted Commercial (May 28, 1981).
B) Disapprove the request, leaving the area in a residential district.
3. Recommendation
A) Staff recommends that the property be rezoned from R-1 to C -1A.
B) That the Ordinance effecting rezoning be adopted.
THE BOARD REVIEWED THE MANY USES PERMITTED AS SPECIAL
EXCEPTIONS IN C -1A ZONING, AND IT WAS NOTED THERE IS A 75' SETBACK
REQUIRED ON S.R. 60 IN THIS AREA.
m im
GEORGE GENTILE, AGENT REPRESENTING INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL
SAVINGS & LOAN, INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS 19 ACRE SITE IS
FAIRLY HEAVILY VEGETATED, AND THEY WILL BE PRESERVING (QUITE A BIT
OF THE VEGETATION. THE SITE WILL BE HEAVILY BUFFERED AND IT WILL
BE ORIENTED TOWARDS COURTYARDS - MORE LIKE A CAMPUS TYPE FACILITY.
THEIR CONCEPT IS TO HAVE A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TYPE PARK,
THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD.
THERE WERE NONE.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER VIODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
BIRD, THE.BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 81-26, REZONING THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY, WHICH IS LOCATED ON S.R. 60 EAST OF KINGS
HIGHWAY AND WEST OF 43RD AVENUE, TO C-lA AS ADVERTISED AND AS
REQUESTED BY INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN.
ROOK- 46 PAU 855
JUL 15 1991 t
33;
r--
JUL 15191
ORDINANCE NO. 81-26
YHcRE.=+S, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Nlotice of Intent to rezone
the hereinafter described- property and pursuant thereto held a public
hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens
were heard; NO: -J, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River
County, Florida, and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended as
fol I0,as:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the
following described property situated in Indian
i
River County, -Florida, to -wit:
Part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 4, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, beginning
at a point on the North line of said Southwest quarter of
said Section 4 which point is 590.6 feet East of the
Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of said Section
4; thence South parallel with the west line of said Section
4, 1311 feet to the northerly line of the right-of-way'of.
main cahal, thence northeasterly along the northerly line:of
said canal right-of-way to a point 1331.2 feet due East of_the
West line of said Section 4; thence North parallel with the
West line of said Section 4, 1041.9 feet to the North line of
the said Southwest quarter, thence west along the north line
of said Southwest quarter of said Section 4, 741 feet to
beginning. E-XCEPT, however, the right-of-way for public
roads, drainage canals, and ditches as shown on the plat of
said lands by tfie pdi—L-v of the first part LESS the west 9.4
feet of the above described property.
The above parcel situated in parts of Tracts 12 and 13, Sec-
tion 4, Township 33 South, Range 39 East,_ -according to Plat
Book 2, page 25, St. Lucie County Public Records_, Indian
River Farms Company Subdivision. Said land situated in
Indian River County, Florida.
Be changed from R-1 Residential District to C -1A Restricted
Commercial District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and
described .in said Zoning Regulations.
This Ordinance shall take effect July zo, 1981,
v
AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR PUBLIC HEARING RE GIFFORD STREET
LIGHTING DISTRICT
THE BOARD REVIEWED THE ADMINISTRATORS MEMO EXPLAINING THE
REQUEST FOR A GIFFORD STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:
TO: -The Honorable Member of the DATE: July 8, 1981 FILE:
Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT: Gifford Street Lighting District
FROM. FERENCES:
Neil A: Nelson
County Administrator
The Administration has received verbal request from Mr. J. Blayne_Jennings,
on behalf of the Gifford community, requesting the Board to call for a public
hearing regarding the creation of a street lighting destrict for the Gifford
area.
1. Description and Conditions
The boundaries of the proposed district would be roughly 49th Street on
North, Kings Highway on the West, 40th Street and the Vero Beach City
limits on the South, and a line East of U.S. Highway # 1 to the East.
Mr. Jennings has received estimates on lighting requirements from Florida
Power and Light Company and the City of Vero Beach, each of which serves
a portion of the proposed district. The proposal from Florida Power & Light
calls for a total of one hundred and three lights at an estimated annual
cost of $5,617. The City of Vero Beach proposal calls for an additional
two hundred and eighty-nine lights at an annual cost of approximately $32,612.
The total three hundred and ninety-two lights proposed by the two electrical
systems would have an annual cost of approximately $38,229.
With estimated contingencies, appraisal and collection of fees, the Administration
estimates a gross budget requirement of $44,452, with a net tax levy of $42,229.
Based upon an estimated tax base within the district of $18,000,000., the
millage requirement would be 2.35 mills. It should be noted the $18,000,000.
tax base utilizes the $15,000. homestead exemption, and will change as the
$20,000. homestead exemption is implemented in 1981, and the $25,000, exemp-
tion is implemented in 19.82. Additionally, final determination of the district
boundaries will affect the district tax base to some extent. -
In the past, Indian River County has created street lighting districts
using the municipal service taxing unit vehicle. In that manner payment
for street lights is based upon a ad valorem tax levied against taxable
property within the unit. As an alternative to that approach, the Board
may wish to consider utilization of a front foot assessment chargel on
an annual basis for street lighting, under the special assessment ordinance
which the Board will consider on August 5, 1981.
2. Recommendation
Based -upon the information available, the Administration recommends the
Board of County.Commissioners hold an initial public hearing to determine
the desirability of creating a street lighting d.istrict.for the Gifford
area under either of the two.alternatives available. Prior to formal
proceedings being initiated to establish the district, the Administration
proposes that the initial public hearing be in the form of a workshop
session to determine the general feeling of the residents and property
owners of the proposed district, and that, based upon information recieveed
at. this initial public hearing/v.orkshop, a determination be rade .re ardi;n r,1 1'0
whether, and which, street lighting district route to purswK � %
JUL 15 1981 4 �7 !,
� Z`
r J� U L 15 1981
O
BOOK
gs_
�t� Cpnr
- t�S
ATTORNEY J. BLAYNE JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH WAS A BIT EXTRAVAGANT
FOR A BEGINNING, AND WHAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO DO IS GET TOGETHER
WITH THE COMMUNITY AND LET THEM KNOW THAT THE PROPOSAL COULD
POSSIBLY BE CUT IN HALF TO MAKE IT MORE COMPATIBLE; THEY ARE
JUST ASKING THE COMMISSION TO AUTHORIZE THIS MATTER FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING - THEY WANT TO START SLOW AND NOT BE OVERCOSTED.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD
DISCUSSED THIS -WITH CITY MANAGER JnHN LITTLE, WHO AGREED THE CITY'S
PROPOSAL COULD BE CUT DOWN CONSIDERABLY.
COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED IF THIS PROPOSED DISTRICT COULD
BE SET UP WITH A MILLAGE CAP, AND THEY THEN COULD WORK UNDER THAT
CAP AND NOT HAVE TO GO TO THE MAXIMUM.
CHAIRMAN LYONS NOTED THAT THE AREA WOULD NOT BE SCALED
DOWN, JUST THE NUMBER OF LIGHTS PROPOSED. HE CONTINUED THAT ATTORNEY
JENNINGS NOW IS TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF $24,000
YEARLY COST, WHICH HE BELIEVED COULD WORK OUT TO SOMETHING A LITTLE
OVER A MILL FOR THAT DISTRICT. HE ASKED IF THIS MIGHT CAUSE A
PROBLEM AS FAR AS ACCEPTANCE OF THE DISTRICT IS CONCERNED.
ATTORNEY JENNINGS DID NOT FEEL THAT IT WOULD, HE STATED
THAT HE WOULD WORK WITH THE PROPERTY APPRAISER AND COME UP WITH
SOME TENTATIVE FIGURES TO GIVE THE PEOPLE SOME IDEA OF THE COST.
COMMISSIONER BIRD QUESTIONED THE DESCRIPTION OF THE
DISTRICT, NOTING THAT n LINE EAST OF U. S. HIGHWAY 1 TO THE EAST"
WAS RATHER VAGUE.
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED PROPERTY APPRAISER NOLTE ABOUT THE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND MR. NOLTE READ THE FOLLOWING LIST OF
BUSINESSES WHICH WOULD BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSED DISTRICT,
INCLUDING THOSE ON THE EAST OF U.S. HIGHWAY 1:
QUALITY FRUIT PACKERS OF INDIAN RIVER
FISHER BEVERAGES
STURGIS LUMBER
GOLDEN SKILLET
GAS MART
PSR. MILLER'S
RIVERFRONT GROVES
LEROY SMITH SONS
BLUE GOOSE
INDIAN RIVER PACKING FRUIT
HAFFIELD CITRUS
HE ESTIMATED THESE PROPERTIES WOULD FURNISH ABOUT 1.5 MILLION OF
TAXABLE VALUE.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON DISPLAYED A MAP OF THE LIGHTS AS
PROPOSED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, CONVERSATION CONTINUED IN RE-
GARD TO THE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, THE DESIRABILITY OF SQUARING OFF
THE DISTRICT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, AND POSSIBLY USING 1.5 MILLS
MAXIMUM AS A SAFE FIGURE.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER ASKED IF THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
WOULD CHARGE JUST A FLAT MONTHLY FEE OR CHARGE FOR CONSTRUCTION, ETC.,
AND THEN A MONTHLY FEE, ATTORNEY BLAYNE ,JENNINGS STATED THAT IT IS
JUST A MONTHLY FEE FOR THE LIGHTS AND MAINTENANCE IS INCLUDED.
DISCUSSION AROSE AS TO HAVING TO PAY FOR BREAKAGE OF
LIGHT BULBS, AND FINANCE OFFICER BARTON STATED THAT ALL OTHER
LIGHTING DISTRICTS HAVE TO PAY TO HAVE BROKEN BULBS REPLACED.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THE MEMO OF.ADMINISTRATOR
NELSON TALKS ABOUT ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF APPROACHING THE FUNDING -
AD VALOREM TAXES OR FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT. HE CONTINUED THAT WITH
THE NEW $20,000 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION, THERE WOULD BE NO MONEY COMING
IN FROM A LARGE MAJORITY OF THE HOMESITES, AND THE ENTIRE COST WILL
HAVE TO BE OBTAINED FROM COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OR THOSE WITH PROPERTY
THAT IS WORTH MORE.
CHAIRMAN LYONS REPORTED THAT HE DISCUSSED WITH THE PROGRES-
SIVE LEAGUE THE FACT THAT THE MAJOR COST OF THE DISTRICT WOULD BE
BORNE BY THOSE WHO HAD PROPERTY VALUED ABOVE THE EXEMPTION, AND HE
BELIEVED THERE IS A VERY STRONG FEELING THAT THEY WANT THE LIGHTS.
HE AGREED THAT THEY ARE NEEDED.
PROPERTY APPRAISER NOLTE INQUIRED WHETHER ANY THOUGHT HAD
BEEN GIVEN TO ASSESSING THIS ON AN ACREAGE OR PARCEL BASIS. HE
NOTED THAT THE EXEMPTIONS WOULD NOT APPLY WHEN THE ASSESSMENT IS
BASED ON A CERTAIN AMOUNT PER ACRE OR FRACTION THEREOF, AND MORE
PEOPLE WOULD BE AFFECTED, THREE DRAINAGE DISTRICTS ARE ASSESSED IN
THIS MANNER, ONE BEING ASSESSED AT $6.00 PER ACRE OR FRACTION THEREOF,
AND MR. NOLTE STATED IT WOULD NOT PRESENT A PROBLEM FOR HIS OFFICE.
HE EMPHASIZED THAT IT MUST BE UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE AN
$18,000 HOUSE AND A $20,000 EXEMPTION MIGHT STILL RECEIVE A SMALL BILL.
MR. NOLTE CONTINUED THAT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN PORT ST,
JUL 1 aoo 6 PAGE 859
5 1991 37
JUL 151981
LJCIE HAS THEIR STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT ON A PARCEL BASIS, AND HE
BELIEVED IT WOULD BE A FAIRER WAY TO DISTRIBUTE THE TAX BURDEN,
THE COMMISSION MEMBERS AND ATTORNEY JENNINGS AGREED THIS
WAS A GOOD IDEA AND MIGHT SOLVE A PROBLEM SINCE EVERYONE IN THAT
AREA HAS A STAKE IN THE STREET LIGHTING.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON AN APPROPRIATE MOTION AND ATTORNEY
COLLINS REQUESTED THAT THE MOTION BE MADE TO COVER MORE THAN ONE POS-
SIBLE METHOD OF FUNDING THE DISTRICT UNTIL HE COULD DETERMINE THAT
A MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING DISTRICT IS AUTHORIZED TO ASSESS AS
SUGGESTED BY MR. NOLTE.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER SCURLOCK, TO AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT OF A PUBLIC HEARING AT
7:30 O'CLOCK P.M. AUGUST 5TH IN REGARD TO SETTING UP A STREET
LIGHTING DISTRICT IN THE GIFFORD AREA, THE ADVERTISEMENT TO INDICATE
THAT FUNDING WILL BE HANDLED EITHER BY SETTING UP A 1.5 MILLAGE AD
VALOREM TAX CAP OR ON A BASIS OF PARCEL BY PARCEL FUNDING.
IN DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE IS A PREFERENCE FOR
THE PARCEL BY PARCEL BASIS, AND THE ATTORNEY AGREED THAT HE WILL DRAFT
THE ORDINANCE ON THAT BASIS IF IT CAN BE DONE.
PROPERTY APPRAISER NOLTE STATED THAT HE WOULD NEED THE
EXACT BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED DISTRICT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE..
DISCUSSION ENSUED IN REGARD TO SQUARING OFF THE BOUNDARIES, AND
ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED, FOR DESCRIPTION PURPOSES, MAKING IT ALL OF
THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22 WHICH WOULD MAKE IT SUBSTANTIALLY
BIGGER, BUT THERE WILL BE DEVELOPMENT THERE.
COMMISSIONER BIRD FELT THERE SHOULD BE SERVICES TO JUSTIFY
THE COST AND DID NOT WANT TO BRING IN AN AREA THAT WILL NOT HAVE THE
LIGHTS.
ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IT COULD BE DESCRIBED AS THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 221 AND COMMISSIONER
BIRD FELT WE NEED ATTORNEY .JENNINGS TO COME IN WITH SOME REALISTIC
INFORMATION ON THE AREA TO BE SERVED AND THEN GET THE DOLLARS FROM
THAT AREA.
ATTORNEY JENNINGS DID NOT BELIEVE WE NEED TO CONCERN OUR-
SELVES WITH THIS FOR THE PURPOSE OF" - VERTISING, BUT WILL HAVE TO HAVE
THIS INFORMATION BY THE TIME OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.
a
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON
AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
AUTHORITY FOR ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT COUNTY IN SUIT FILED BY DIGITAL
COMPUTER CONTROLS, INC.
ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT THE COUNTY HAS BEEN SERVICED
IN A THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT, WHICH HE BELIEVED REVOLVES AROUND THE
COMPUTER IN THE PROPERTY APPRAISERS OFFICE.
MR. NOLTE EXPLAINED THAT HIS OFFICE PAID CENTRAL FLORIDA
COMPUTER SERVICES AND HAVE THE CANCELLED CHECK; THEY ARE CLEAR, THE
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT COMPANY DELIVERED THE COMPUTER AND LOST THE CHECK
SOMEWHERE. WHATEVER INSURANCE OR GUARANTEES HAVE TO BE PUT UP, HAVE
BEEN PUT UP, AND HE BELIEVED A NEW CHECK HAS BEEN ISSUED. HE DID
NOT REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT THE SUIT IS ABOUT.
ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT APPARENTLY THE ORIGINAL
DEFENDANT DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL
OFFICERS AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND SUED THE COUNTY,
HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS REALLY UP TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER TO
RESOLVE THIS, AND HE HAS BEEN IN CONTACT WITH ROBERT JACKSON, THE
PROPERTY APPRAISERS ATTORNEY IN THIS REGARD.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE INQUIRED IF THE ATTORNEY NEEDED OFFICIAL
ACTION STATING THAT HE IS AUTHORIZED TO REPRESENT THE BOARD IN THE
EVENT WE NEED TO TAKE ANY LEGAL POSITION, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED
THAT WHILE HE DID NOT BELIEVE THIS IS A MAJOR ISSUE, HE FELT HE
SHOULD BE SO AUTHORIZED.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO WORK WITH
THE PROPERTY APPRAISER`S ATTORNEY, IF NECESSARY, IN RESPONSE TO
CIVIL ACTION SUIT N0, 81-8026 FILED BY DIGITAL COMPUTER CONTROLS, INC.
CHANGE ORDER #3 FOR PHASE II GIFFORD AREA FEWER & I`!ATER IMPROVEMENTS
GUY WILLS, ENGINEER FOR SVERDRUP & PARCEL, OF THE .JOINT
VENTURE, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD TO EXPLAIN THE REASON FOR THE CHANGE
ORDER IN REGARD TO A FLOW REGULATOR BOX FOR THE SEWAGE TREATMENT
PLANT. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE COUNTY ACTUALLY WAS GOING TO FABRICATE
THE BOX THEMSELVES, BUT THE CONTRACT HAD ALREADY BEEN LET; THEREFORE,
THEY JUST HAD FMHA PAY FOR THIS INSTEAD OF THE COUNTY AND HAD IT
ADDED BY CHANGE ORDER. IT WAS IN THE PLANS ALL ALONG,
BOOK 46- PAU 861
JUL 151981 39
r JUL 15 1981`
J 600K
APPROVAL OF BIOLOGICAL REPORT REGARDING EXTENSION OF INDIAN RIVER
BOULEVARD
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT A LETTER HAS
BEEN RECEIVED FROM BEVERLY BIRKITT, ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST OF THE
DER, STATING THAT THE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE EXTENSION OF INDIAN
RIVER BOULEVARD IS INCOMPLETE WITHOUT LOCAL APPROVAL FOR FILLING
WATERWARD OF THE EXISTING HIGH WATER LINE. IN ORDER TO BUILD A ROAD
AS PROPOSED FOR INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD EXTENSION, IT IS NECESSARY
FOR BOTH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND CITY COUNCIL TO READ
THE BIOLOGICAL REPORT INTO THEIR MINUTES.
DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO WHETHER IT WAS NECESSARY TO
ACTUALLY READ THE REPORT ALOUD, AND THE CHAIRMAN NOTED THAT SINCE THE
ROAD REQUIRES FILL, WE HAVE TO SPECIFICALLY NOTE THE ENVIRONMENTAL
REPORT AND AGREE THAT THIS WILL HAPPEN BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO KNOW
THAT WE ARE AWARE THAT SOME OF THE FILL IS GOING TO BE IN THE TIDAL
WETLANDS.
ADMINISTRATOR NELSON THEREUPON READ THE FOLLOWING REPORT
INTO THE MINUTES:
f t.S'. of Flono>t
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Fa Rovtinq. TQ binrld f1Hl�w—"—""-j
awt/Or To Othw Than I he , roes"
To:
Loci _
To
Locin.:
70:
Loc in..
Oatr
TO: File
ST. JOHNS RIVER DISTRICT
THROLIC:i: Beverly Birkett
THROUGH: Walt Wheeler
FROM: Meese. Kessler
DATN'- May 15, 1981
SUI3ncr: Indian River County - D/I'
Indian River Country
File No. 31-39798
A.
The applicant proposes to construct approximately a one mile ex-
tension of Indian River Blvd. from SR60 north to Barber Avenue. T}o
primary purpose for the road is to provide quicker access to a
n(-Iarby hospital. ' The extension, across mosquito control impoundment._;,
includes: 1) constructing a 126 foot bridge over the main canal,
2) installing a double 10 foot by 5 foot box culvert in the north
canal (Vossinbury Creek), 3) installing a double 9 foot by 4 foot
box culvert in a'ditch along Barber Avenue, and 4) providing several
eliptical pipes under the proposed road. n total of approximately
8.1 acres of wetlands are involved. ,%�
The crossing and filling of the wetlands will be
of fill (mostly a moquito control back dike) and
24 inch culverts with flap gates (on downstream
tidal influence to impounded wetlands.
B.
offs
the
side)
O�
The general vicinity is the west shore of the Indian
Keach north of S R60. This section of the Indian Rive
Waters and is moderately developed. Development, restricted mainly
to south of SR60 and the river east shore, consists of single family
waterfront homes. The project vicinity and areas immediately n6rth
can be characterized as historical mixed mangrove and Batis/Salicornia
communities. Later these areas were impounded to control mosquito
breeding. Due to property owner requests, each impoundment cell
is now in differing adverse conditions. Some cells are no longer
managed for mosquito breeding by the impounding technique (dikes
remain) while others are influenced by tides. Within the past few
E00� ,
_ PALE 863
JUL 15 1981 41
JUL 151981
File
flay 15, 1981
Page two
B60K ,J' pAGF
months, consultants have inquired about developing the nearby uplands
and impoundments.
Several meetings have been :field with county officials, regulatory
agencies and the project consultant. One of the major concerns is
the effect that the road might have on the master drainage plan now
being considered by'the county. Immediate attention to this problem
has been expressed by residents within a subdivision west of the
proposed road. ,
Another concern which has been obvious to all regulatory agencies
since the early 1970's has been the concomittant development of the
wetlands surrounding the proposed -road and the possible extension
of the road further north through additional wetlands. Regulatory
agencies have been giving special consideration to this project
because of the expressed need to provide quick emergency service
to the hospital and the lack of alternate routes.
C,
The project area can be divided into 3 distinct areas: 1) Main
Canal, 2) Vossinbury Creek, and 3) mosquito control impoundments.
Again Canal
The main canal is the Indian River Farms Drainage Cariali� 'ch drains
to the Ind4an River. This canal provides drainage no 4(M-61
citrus groves but also for urban and -residential are nal
is approximately 60 feet wide, has a wier structure (t.str
the proposed road) and steep banks vegetated by peppert ae
toward the Indian River). �,
Vossinbury Creek,Q�
Vossinbury Creek is now a ditch that runs west to east tJ Y of
the Indian River and 'is between mosquito control impoundments. The
ditch is approximately 25 feet wide and is vegetated by mangrove.
The upstream end of Vossinbury Creek, the west end of the impoundment,
widens and has islands of red mangrove. A tidal ditch extends
northward from Vossinbury Creek and along the mosquito control back
dike to Barber Avenue.
_ry
File
flay 15, 1981
Page three
Mosau i Lo Control lint-)oundments
M
Four separate cells will be crossed. one is more distinct than
the other three in that it has not been subjected to "dewatering"
by mosquito control: as requested by the property owner. This ce11
apparently receives some runoff from the adjacent subdivision and
has a relief culvert at the southeast corner to the Main Canal.
This area is distinct because a viable black mangrove../seA oxeye
community exists.
The rcmai.nintj impoundment cells aro in an :Idvorno condition c111 t.c+
mosquito control techniques holh impounding anti the requests oz
property owners to stop flooding the land, discharge of fill and
no efforts to restore tidal conditions within the watland. Thi-;
condition was worsened as a result of recent severe cold winters.
The result of these factors are a dry wetland, significant nuri:_,e-
of dead mangrove (however, several are sending out new shoots),
and the invasion of undersirable vegetation (Melaleuca so. and
peppertree). The invasion of these plants have occurrernt-ai fill
sites.
D.
The proposed road will cross wetlands that have been impoun ed for
mosquito control and large sections that are filled wetlai
(including back dikes). The impacts to these areas will -et
by fill removal and, therefore, recreating the tidal we
the restoration of tidal action to the impounded sites. J�
E.
Discussions with other regulatory agencies have brough t.
additional ways to minimize the impact. These include:
use of an adjustable'wier instead of a flap gate, and 2) the wal
of the section of back dike between Vossinbury Creek and Barber.
Avenue. Both of these would better restore lost wetlands. If a
flap gated culvert must be used then the flap gate must be installed
on the upstream end of the. culvert. The flap gate on the downstream
end serves only to drain the impoundment and not to restore tidal
action. The additional dike removal will also provide additional
sources of fill for road construction.
BOOK 6 PACE 865
J U L 15 1981 43
BOOK 4
'JUL 15198`f
COUNTY ENGINEER JAMES DAVIS TOOK OVER FOR ADMINISTRATOR
NELSON, WHO HAD TO LEAVE THE MEETING TO ATTEND A FUNERAL
CHAIRMAN LYONS NOTED THAT THE DOCUMENT HAVING BEEN READ
INTO THE MINUTES AND MADE A PART OF THE RECORD, WE NOW NEED A MOTION
THAT WE APPROVE OF THE ACTIVITY WHICH IS OUTLINED THEREIN.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER BIRD, THAT THE BOARD APPROVE THE BIOLOGICAL REPORT AS READ
INTO THE MINUTES AND INDICATE THAT WE UNDERSTAND THAT A ROAD WILL GO
THROUGH THAT WETLAND AREA NECESSITATING THE MOVEMENT OF FILL MATERIAL
IN SAID AREA,
ENGINEER DAVIS COMMENTED THAT THE REPORT INCORPORATES
COMMENTS MADE BY THE FISH, GAME AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION, WHICH SUGGEST
THE USE OF AN ADJUSTABLE WEIR INSTEAD OF A FLAP GATE.
CHAIRMAN LYONS DID NOT FEEL THAT IS REALLY IMPORTANT AT
THIS POINT. IF THERE IS GOING TO BE AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD SUGGESTED,
HE DID NOT BELIEVE IT IS UP FOR DISCUSSION AT THIS TIME.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK ASKED IF THE MOTION IS THAT THE REPORT
IS READ INTO THE MINUTES AND WE UNDERSTAND IT, OR THAT WE AGREE WITH
WHAT WAS READ BECAUSE HE DID NOT AGREE WITH WHAT WAS READ AS HE FELT
THERE ARE ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO REACH THE HOSPITAL AND REDUCE THE
RESPONSE TIME, SUCH AS USING PARAMEDICS AND MOVING THE PERSONNEL OUT
TO THE PEOPLE. HE STATED THAT EVEN THOUGH OTHER COMMISSIONERS MAY
LIKE THIS PROJECT, HE DID NOT HAVE TO AGREE WITH THEM.
CHAIRMAN LYONS COMMENTED THAT HE DID NOT NECESSARILY LIKE IT,
BUT TOOK THE POINT OF VIEW THAT WE ARE GOING TO NEED THAT ROAD FOR A
BY-PASS AROUND THE CITY AS POPULATION INCREASES.
JUSTIFIED;
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK POINTED OUT THAT IS NOT HOW IT IS BEING
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT BACK FOR MANY YEARS, ALL
THE ORIGINAL LONG RANGE PLANNING DESIGNATED THIS EXTENSION, AND HE
MUST AGREE WITH THE CHAIRMAN REGARDING TRANSPORTATION AND MOVEMENT
FROM S.R. AIA INTO B.S. I; ALTHOUGH AT PRESENT THE PROPOSED EXTENSION
PRIMARILY SERVES THE HOSPITALS HE 'FELT IT WILL BE AN IMPORTANT
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK FOR ALL OF US IN THE FUTURE.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER ASKED IF THEY VISUALIZE INDIAN RIVER
4
44
BOULEVARD EXTENDING NORTHWARD PAST BARBER AVENUE AND CHAIRMAN LYONS
NOTED THAT WHILE IT COULD GO FURTHER NORTH, IT CANNOT GO ANY FURTHER
TO THE EAST.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE BELIEVED INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD WILL
EVENTUALLY CONNECT TO U.S. 1 TO THE NORTH OF BARBER AVENUE AND WILL
BECOME AN IMPORTANT ARTERY.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED THAT HIS POINT IS THAT TO HIM
THE PRIMARY USE AND RESULT OF THE PROPOSED EXTENSION WILL BE FOR THE
EXPANSION OF FURTHER LAND DEVELOPMENT IN THAT AREA AND HE BELIEVED
THE COST SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE PEOPLE WHO WILL BENEFIT, NOT THE
TAXPAYER. TO USE THE HOSPITAL AS THE EXCUSE FOR THE ROAD WAS NOT
PALATABLE TO HIM.
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT IT SEEMS THE BOTTOM
LINE IS THAT WE SEE THIS EXTENSION AS AN EXPANSION OF OUR TRAFFIC
SYSTEM, AND MAYBE TO HAVE ANOTHER MAJOR TRAFFIC ARTERY IS FINE, BU:
THAT IS NOT WHAT HE HAS BEEN HEARING AND IT IS NOT STATED IN THE
REPORT.
CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO WHETHER THE BOARD
IS ACTUALLY APPROVING THE REPORT OR SIMPLY ACCEPTING IT. ENGINEER
DAVIS NOTED THAT THE ACTUAL STATEMENT IS THAT THE DER WILL NEED
LOCAL APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED
OUT THAT WE ALREADY HAVE APPROVED THE PROJECT; HE STATED THAT HIS
MOTION IS TO APPROVE THE BIOLOGICAL REPORT AS READ INTO THE MINUTES,
AND COMMISSIONER BIRD AGREED.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED 3 TO 2 WITH COMMISSIONERS FLETCHER AND SCURLOCK VOTING IN
OPPOSITION.
ANN ROBINSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT SHE.IS SPOKESWOMAN
FOR THE AUDUBON SOCIETY, AND HAD WISHED TO SPEAK ON THIS MATTER
BECAUSE THE AUDUBON SOCIETY WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO SEE THE BOARD
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ALTERNATIVE OF USING AN ADJUSTABLE WEIR
INSTEAD OF A FLAP GATE,AS RECOMMENDED BY THE FISH & WILDLIFE COMMIS-
SION. SHE FELT IT IS VERY DIFFICULT FOR THE BOARD TO BE PUT IN THE
POSITION OF APPROVING AN ENTIRE REPORT AT THE LAST MINUTE, AND SHE
OBJECTED TO THE BOARD BEING ASKED TO GIVE BLANKET APPROVAL TO A
REPORT THAT NONE OF THEM HAD EVEN SEEN.
45
eoo 46 PAGE 867
J U L 151981
CHAIRMAN LYONS INFORMED MRS.
BOOS '
pq "E�
ROBINSON THAT HE HAD SEEN THE
REPORT AND HAD READ IT. HE EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD THOUGHT SHE WAS
TALKING TO ENGINEER DAVIS AND DID NOT REALIZE SHE WISHED TO BE HEARD.
ARGUMENT CONTINUED AS TO WHO HAD OR HAD NOT SEEN OR READ
THE REPORT AND AS TO THE NECESSITY OF ACTUALLY APPROVING IT AS OPPOSED
TO MERELY ACCEPTING IT.
WITH REGARD TO INDICATING A PREFERENCE FOR ONE STRUCTURE
RATHER -THAN ANOTHER, COMMISSIONER BIRD FELT WE WOULD HAVE TO OBTAIN
INFORMATION FROM OUR ENGINEER BEFORE MAKING SUCH A DECISION, AND HE
DID NOT FEEL THAT DECISION HAD TO BE MADE TODAY.
INTERESTED CITIZEN WILLIAM KOOLAGE SUGGESTED THAT POSSIBLY
THE BOARD SHOULD RECONSIDER THEIR ACTION.
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER MADE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE BOARD'S
PREVIOUS ACTION, BUT IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT SUCH A MOTION CANNOT BE
MADE BY ONE WHO VOTED IN OPPOSITION TO THE BOARDS ACTION AND ALSO
THAT A 4/5 VOTE IS NECESSARY TO APPROVE RECONSIDERATION.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS-
SIONER BIRD, TO RECONSIDER THE BOARDS PREVIOUS ACTION APPROVING THE
_OGICAL REPORT.
FURTHER DISCUSSION WAS HELD IN REGARD TO THE NEED TO TAKE
ACTION TODAY-, AND COMMISSIONER FLETCHER WISHED TO KNOW WHAT ANOTHER
FEW WEEKS WOULD MATTER AFTER SO MANY YEARS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE
POINTED OUT THAT ANY DELAYS ARE NOW COSTING US 1% A MONTH OR ABOUT
$10,000412,000,
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE (QUESTION ON THE MOTION TO RE-
CONSIDER, AND IT WAS DEFEATED BY A 3-2 VOTE WITH COMMISSIONERS WODTKE
AND BIRD VOTING IN OPPOSITION; A 4/5 VOTE OF APPROVAL BEING NECESSARY.
MRS. ROBINSON STATED THAT, ALTHOUGH SHE HAD A LOT OF
ADMIRATION FOR COMMISSIONER WODTKE, HE WAS OUT OF THE ROOM WHEN THE
REPORT WAS READ, AND AS A CITIZEN, SHE OBJECTED TO HIS VOTING ON SOME-
THING WHEN HE HADNfT EVEN READ IT.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPLIED THAT, ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT READ
THE LETTER ITSELF, HE HAD TALKED TO ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ABOUT IT AND
HAD A GOOD IDEA OF IT. HE CONSIDERED IT SIMPLY PUTTING AN ADMINISTRA-
TIVE REPORT IN THE RECORD AND NOT CHOOSING ONE ALTERNATIVE OR THE
OTHER. HE NOTED THAT THE DER JUST WANTS US TO BE AWARE OF THEIR
r
REPORT, AND HE DID NOT BELIEVE IT IS UP TO US TO DETERMINE WHICH
ALTERNATIVE SHOULD BE FOLLOWED, HE FURTHER STATED THAT HE DID
BELIEVE IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT WE MOVE THIS PROJECT ON BECAUSE THE
MORE WE DELAY IT, THE MORE COSTLY IT WILL BE.
CHANGE ORDER #5O - ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
THE CHAIRMAN ANNOUNCED THAT CHANGE ORDER #50 WILL BE
WITHDRAWN FROM TODAY IS AGENDA,
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - COLONIAL HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION
COUNTY ENGINEER DAVIS READ THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AS
FOLLOWS:
TO: The Honorable Board of County DATE: July 8, 1981 FILE:
Commissioners
SUBJECT: Request for Final Plat Approval,
Colonial Heights S/D - approximately
17.6 acres containing 28 lots
located west of Dixie Highway south
of 8th Street
FROM:: Neil A. Nel�'_ REFERENCES:
County Administrator
Description and Conditions
The Engineer of Record, Mr. Ed Schmucker, has requested final plat
approval of the above subject subdivision. The Engineer of Record has
certified that all improvements are in accordance with the approved
prelominary plat drawings and the Subdivision Ordinance and that out-
standing billings are current.
Analysis and Alternatives
On July 7, 1981, a final inspection was performed by the County
Engineer at the site and the attached discrepancy items were noted.
All items on the final inspection list have been completed except
the following.:
1.) Due to present drought conditions burning of cleared
material and seeding and mulching has not been performed.
Once drought conditions subside, the developer has indicated
that he will seed and mulch all swales and easements and
burn the cleared material. The Forestry Division will not
issue a burning permit until the dry conditions improve.
The developer would like to post a cash maintenance bond
with the County for this work.
2.) The street signs have not been installed, but are on order.
Traffic control signs have been installed. The developer
would like to submit a cash performenace bond for the
materials and installation of the street signs to be refunded
once they are installed.
JUL 151991
47
m K 46 PAGE 869
J
JUL 151981 EoaK 70
J
Recommendations and Funding
The staff recommends approval of the Final Plat of Colonial Heights
Subdivison, subject to the posting of a maintenance/performance bond in
the amount of $8,780.00 to cover the burning/removal of cleared material,
seeding and germination of grass in Swale and easement areas, and the
installation of traffic control signs.
Recommendations and Funding (Continued)
There are no funding considerations to be addressed by the Board
for this item.
ENGINEER DAVIS NOTED THAT ANOTHER ITEM HAS COME TO THEIR
ATTENTION WHICH IS NOT .INCLUDED IN THE MEMO. IT IS CONCERNED WITH
MONIES TO BE HELD IN ESCROW FOR ACCELERATION AND DECELERATION LANES
ON 8TH STREET, THE NEED FOR SUCH LANES TO BE DETERMINED BY AN
INDEPENDENT TRAFFIC ENGINEER. MR. DAVIS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT
HE HAS BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE DOT TO DETERMINE SOME CRITERIA TO
ESTABLISH THE NEED FOR THESE LANES, AND SINCE THE DOT DID NOT FEEL
RIVER SHORES WAS LARGE ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY A DECELERATION LANE, HE
DID NOT BELIEVE THIS SUBDIVISION OF ONLY 28 LOTS WOULD QUALIFY.
DISCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF SUCH
LANES OR LANE, WHETHER EASTBOUND OR WESTBOUND, THE VISIBILITY, ETC.,
AND IT WAS GENERALLY FELT THAT THE ENTRANCE TO COLONIAL HEIGHTS
WAS IN A BETTER POSITION THAN THAT OF COLONIAL TERRACE WHICH IS
FURTHER WEST,
ENGINEER DAVIS STATED THAT THE RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL
IS SUBJECT TO POSTING OF A MAINTENANCE AND PERFORMANCE BOND IN THE
AMOUNT OF $8,780.00 TO COVER THE REMOVAL OF CLEARED MATERIAL, SEEDING
AND GERMINATION OF GRASS IN SWALE AND EASEMENT AREAS; THE INSTALLATION
OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS; AND ALSO, ON RECOMMENDATION OF THE ATTORNEY,
A NOTE TO BE INCLUDED ON THE DEDICATION STATING THAT LOTS 14-20 ARE
RESTRICTED TO ONE SINGLE FAMILY UNIT PER LOT.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCUP,LOCK, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER FLETCHER, TO GRANT FINAL APPROVAL OF COLONIAL HEIGHTS
SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AND COUNTY ATTORNEY AS STATED.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED IF THERE IS GOING TO BE ANY TREES
OR SHRUBBERY OF ANY KIND BETWEEN THE ROAD AND THE COLONIAL TERRACE
AREA, AND FRANK ZORC STATED ALTHOUGH THERE IS NOTHING REQUIRED ON
48 '
THE PLAT, HE HAS DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE FOUR NEIGHBORS AFFECTED WHO
ADJOIN THIS PROPERTY ON THE WEST, ARD THEY ARE TRYING TO MAKE UP
THEIR MINDS WHETHER THEY WANT A HEDGE OR A WOODEN FENCE. HE WILL
WORK WITH THEM ON THIS.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE (QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
RESOLUTION 81-1a5 ADOPTING RATE INCREASE FOR HOBART LANDING
LOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY
COMMISSIONER BIRD, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 81—L15 GRANTING A RATE INCREASE
FOR HOBART LANDING AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF .JULY 1, 1981,
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT HE HAD UNDERSTOOD THAT
THE FINANCE OFFICER WAS GOING TO COME UP WITH SOME KIND OF SPECIFI':
FORMULA TO GIVE THE COUNTY A MEANS OF EVALUATING AND ADJUSTING THE
MONEY THAT SHOULD BE ESCROWED AND TO INCREASE IT�IF NECESSARY,
BECAUSE IF IT TURNED OUT THAT A PLANT WAS NOT MAINTAINED PROPERLY
DURING THE YEAR, AN AMOUNT SUCH AS $8,000 COULD END UP BEING
INSIGNIFICANT. HE DID NOT FEEL THERE IS A BIG PROBLEM WITH THIS
PARTICULAR FRANCHISE BUT THAT WE DO NEED TO GET SOME CONTROL OF THIS
PROBLEM IN GENERAL.
THE BOARD GENERALLY AGREED THAT THIS SYSTEM WAS NOT OF A
MAGNITUDE TO BE A SIGNIFICANT PROBLEM, BUT IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT
IF THE $8,000 WERE TO BE DEPLETED, THERE WOULD BE NOTHING TO
FALL BACK ON.
ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT WE COULD CLARIFY THE RESOLUTION AND
PUT THE BURDEN ON THE FRANCHISEE FOR MAINTENANCE.
COMMISSIONER BIRD SUGGESTED THAT WE CONSIDER REWORDING
THE PHRASE "IN THE EVENT THE FRANCHISEE FAILS TO MAKE NECESSARY
REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENT AS WOULD BE'REQUIRED BY INDUSTRY PRACTICE
OR CUSTOM" TO READ THAT IT WOULD BE "AS REQUIRED BY ANNUAL INSPECTION".
THE BOARD AGREED THIS WAS A GOOD THOUGHT,
ATTORNEY COLLINS RECOMMENDED THAT A PHRASE BE ADDED IN
RESOLUTION 81-45, PARAGRAPH 2, AFTER THE WORD AVAILABLE, TO READ AS
FOLLOWS: "2. HOBART LANDING SERVICES COMPANY AGREES TO IMMEDIATELY
MAKE AVAILABLE, MAINTAIN AND REPLENISH IF DIMINISHED, THE SUM OF
$8,000 TO BE PLACED IN AN INTEREST BEARING ACCOUNT BY THE COUNTY."
P00K 46PAGE 8 11
JUL 151981 49
JUL 151981
COMMISSIONERS VIODTKE AND BIRD AMENDED THEIR MOTION TO
INCLUDE THE WORDING AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ATTORNEY. THE CHAIRMAN
CALLED FOR THE QUESTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 81-45 AS AMENDED;
IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED 4 TO 1 WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER
VOTING IN OPPOSITION.
RESOLUTION NO. 81-45
WHEREAS, this Board heretofore did grant a water fran-
chise to HOBART LANDING SERVICES COMPANY, on October 7, 1970,
under Resolution No. 70-44, said franchise being known as the
"Hobart Landing Services Company Water Franchise'; and
WHEREAS, publication of a Notice of Public Hearing was
duly made; and
WHEREAS, this Board did on July 1, 1981 hold a public
hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUN .
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the water
franchise, being Resolution No. 70-44, previously issued to
HOBART LANDING SERVICES COMPANY, shall include the following terms
as either additions or amendments to Resolution No. 70-44 as the
case may be:
1. The rate schedule shall be changed and amended to pro-
vide for the following user rates:
WATER RATE
Residential
First 3,000 gallons $6.00 per month -minimum
i,
All over 3,000 gallons $1.00 per 1,000 gallons
2. HOBART LANDING SERVICES COMPANY agrees to immediately
make available, maintain and replenish if diminished, the sum of
$8,000.00 to be placed in an interest bearing account by the
County. Hobart Landing Services Company shall be entitled to all
I
interest accruing from such account, which interest shall be pay-
able to Hobart on a monthly basis. The above funds shall be
used as a sinking fund and applied only for repairs and/or re-
placement by the County in the event Hobart fails to make neces-
sary repairs or replacement as would be required by industry
'i
practice or custom in operating a water franchise of this size
i
and kind.
3. HOBART LANDING SERVICES COMPANY agrees to cause to be
paid to the County, as a future hookup charge into the County's
master water system and as an impact fee, payment in the amount of
$320..00 per lot which is sold by Hobart Brothers Company, an Ohio
BOOK _ 0 PACE 873
JUL x.51991 '
JUL 1981,
ROOK pF874
corporation, commencing after the date of this agreement. Such
impact fee shall be due and payable to the County within 10 days
after the closing of the sale of any lot and shall be held in the
County Impact Escrow Account for the benefit of Indian River
County.
4. The franchise and rights herein granted shall take
effect and be in force from and after the time of the adoption of
this resolution by the Board and shall continue in force and
effect until such time as the County may install or acquire its
own water supply and distribution system and supplies the same to
individual customers. At that time, for value received and hereby
acknowledged by Hobart, the owner will convey all of its water
facilities (except for water plant, equipment and plant sites) and
easements for location of the same as owners may own, free and
clear of all liens or mortgages, to said County, without charge.
BOARD OFOUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN I ER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
By
airman
Attest.
1
Clerk
ACCEPTANCE
The undersigned hereby accepts the foregoing Resolution
and for itself, its successors and assigns, does hereby covenant
and agree to comply with and abide by all of the items, conditions
and provisions
set forth in
said
franchise
as amended.
Dated
this�day
of
ao(C"
, 1981.
HOBART LANDING SERVICES COMPANY
By
FW--d-Briggs, Dis ict Manager
Effective: 7-1-81
Adopted: 7-15-81
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer
duly qualified to take acknowledgments, personally appeared
FRED BRIGGS, District Manager respectively of HOBART LANDING
SERVICES COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, to me known to be the
person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged before me that he executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State
last aforesaid this '`�`=qday of August, 1981.
Notar PubliSt t f F1 d
AL 151991
y c, a e o ori a s
Large.
My commission expires:
i
I
Is C11
BOOK PAGE 8 1 5
JUL 5 1981'
G : l6 PAGE 8°76
DISCUSSION REGARDING SUIT BY TREASURE COAST UTILITIES
ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT FLORIDA STATUTE
111 PROVIDES THAT IF COMMISSIONERS OR COUNTY AGENTS ARE INVOLVED IN
CIVIL ACTION LITIGATION, THE COUNTY HAS THE BURDEN TO DEFEND THEM OR
PAY ANY JUDGMENTS THAT RESULT FROM THAT SUIT. HE STATED THAT HE
HAS PREPARED A RESOLUTION SETTING FORTH THE TERMS OF AUTHORITY IN
THE STATUTES AND MAKING A RECORD OF THE FACT THAT THE COUNTY WILL
HOLD EACH OF THOSE LISTED IN THE RESOLUTION HARMLESS FROM ANY
COURT DECISION.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED RESOLUTION 81-Ii6.
RESOLUTION NO. 81-46
WHEREAS, on May 6, 1981, TREASURE COAST UTILITIES, INC. and
D. TRAVIS SALTER filed Civil Action No. 81-8175 in the U. S.
District Court for the Southern District against WILLARD W. SIEBERT, JR.
ALMA LEE LOY, WILLIAM C. WODTKE, R. DON DEESON, PATRICK B. LYONS,
A. GROVER FLETCHER, DON C. SCURLOCK, JR., DICK BIRD, ED SCHMUCKER,
GEORGE G. COLLINS, JR. and THE COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER, FLORIDA; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statutes 111.07, 111.071 and
other appropriate authority, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY is authorized to
provide a defense and to pay judgments or settlements on behalf of
the above named persons who are named individually in the above
styled litigation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS-
SIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that, pursuant to the
above cited authority,
1. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY shall provide legal defense on behalf
of each of the above named defendants and pay the costs associated
with such defense including appeals.
2. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY shall pay any judgments or settlements
that may be obtained against the above named individual defendants
including damages (all as alleged in the Complaint), costs and
attorneys fees.
3. Indemnify and hold harmless each of the above named
individuals from all damages, costs and attorneys fees arising
from the above styled civil action.
4. This Resolution shall continue in full force and effect
until the civil action is concluded and shall apply to both past
and present officers or agents, whether or not they are at the
present or continue to serve in their stated capacities.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
C
E
At t s t :
reda Wright
Clerk of Circuit Court
Adopted: July 15, 1981
JUL 15 1981
BOOK4 PAU 877 7
J U L 15 198 ® j 878
ATTORNEY COLLINS GAVE THE BOARD AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS
OF THE TREASURE COAST LITIGATION, EXPLAINING THAT THE COUNTY'S
ATTORNEYS HAVE FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS ACCOMPANIED BY AN
EXHAUSTIVE 57 PAGE MEMO HITTING ON ALL THE ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN
RAISED. IT IS NOW A BURDEN ON THE PLAINTIFF TO COME FORTH WITH AN
ACCOUNTABILITY MEMO. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE IS IMPRESSED
BY THE WORK BEING PUT OUT BY THE ATTORNEYS REPRESENTING THE COUNTY
IPJ THIS -ACTION. HE FELT THAT IN AUGUST WE SHOULD TRY AND SET UP
A MEETING WITH THE VARIOUS PARTIES AND ONCE THE POSITIONS HAVE
BEEN ESTABLISHED, AT LEAST TRY AND TALK TO EACH OTHER.
DISCUSSION REGARDING INCREASING ASSESSMENTS FOR CRIMINAL .JUSTICE
TRAINING
ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT FOR THE LAST SEVEN OR EIGHT
YEARS, THE CITY AND COUNTY HAVE HAD $1.00 FOR LOCAL AND $1.00 FOR
STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES TACKED ON TO EACH TRAFFIC
AND CRIMINAL OFFENSE CITATION, AND IT WAS FELT THIS PROGRAM HAS BEEN
VERY SUCCESSFUL. THE ATTORNEY NOTED THAT THEY NOW HAVE INCREASED
THE AUTHORITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO ADD $2.00 FOR BOTH LOCAL AND
-ATE LAW ENFORCEMENT EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ON EACH OFFENSE. ATTORNEY
60 LLINS REPORTED THAT HE HAS HAD PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE OFFICERS
TRAINING PROGRAM AND KNEW IT TO BE WORTHWHILE, AND HE WOULD RECOMMEND
THAT ANIMPLEMENTING ORDINANCE BE ADVERTISED FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER
FLETCHER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE
A PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE TO IMPLEMENT AN INCREASE IN THE
AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THE LAW ENFORCEMENT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM.
COMMISSIONER BIRD NOTED THAT HE ATTENDED A SCHOOL BOARD
MEETING AS CHAIRMAN OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE WHERE THE
RECOMMENDATION FOR ADDITIONAL PARKING AT THE 16TH STREET RECREA-
TIONAL COMPLEX WAS DISCUSSED. THE SCHOOL BOARD RECEIVED THE
PRESENTATION AND SAW A REVISED PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THE FOUR -LANE
POSSIBILITY. HE CONTINUED THAT THEY DISCUSSED IT BUT TABLED FURTHER
ACTION ON IT, AND THE INDICATION HE GOT WAS THAT THEY PROBABLY WOULD
NOT BE IN FAVOR OF GOING A FULL 1/3 OF THE COST, OR $41,000, BUT
MIGHT COME UP WITH SOME PORTION. THE CITY OF VERO BEACH HAS
AGREED TO THEIR $41,000 IN THEIR BUDGET PROCESS. COMMISSIONER
BIRD STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE COUNTY COMMISSION RE-
ADDRESS THIS WHEN WE NEXT DISCUSS BUDGET MATTERS, AND IN THE MEANTIME,
HOPEFULLY, WE WILL HAVE THE SCHOOL BOARD'S FINAL DECISION.
APPLICATION FOR DUNE CROSS-OVER PERMIT - 70' STRIP
APPLICATION FOR DUNE CROSS-OVER PERMIT FOR THE 70' COUNTY
STRIP NORTH OF THE TRACKING STATION PROPERTY AND JUST SOUTH OF THE
TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES
AS APPROVED AT THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 5, 1980,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Bureau of Beaches and Shores
3900 Commonwealth Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32303
(904)488-3180
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION
State of Florida County of Indian_ River County
I, Indian River Count, , am the owner of the property described below:
(PrBvide legal description of property)
The South seventy feet (70') o` Gc,vernr..ent Lot 1, Section 36,Township 31
South, Range 39 East, as measurer an the perpendicular to the South line
or said property (which, is the South lire of said Government Lot 1) lying
Easterly of the Easterly right- cf State Road A -1-A.
I hereby authorize
James W. Davis, P.E.
to make
application for a permit for construction or other activities seaward of the coastal construction control line
or 50 -foot setback on the above-mentioned property.
Signature of Propertv Owner
William C. Wodtke, Jr. , vice ChaiYrm of the
Board of County Commissioners
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 20th day of July , 1981
ATTEST:
/ry
Freda Wright,
Clerk
v Notary Public U
aa�;�r.f rJUIC S FC Or FIOAICA
My commission expire $_"'` r;; 'i MIS<'(:'?' F=iIL'S h:'3.
JIt U 11j"j iN.R * L i "4 . I Vi�rR'.' r e "-:5
BOOK 46 PAGE 879
DNR Form 32602 (16) 111/80) File No.
JUL 151991 57
LIEN FOR DEMOLITION OF HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE
LIEN AGAINST VIOLA YOUNG FOR REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE
ON HER PROPERTY IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS AUTHORIZED
AT THE MEETING OF MARCH 5, 1980.
s�
Z81M
THIS LIEN, filed the
I, I
16 th ?,_;�. o f Jul
1981,
by INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of
Florida, pursuant to the authority of Chapter 65-1712,
House Bill leo. 638, Laws of Florida, for the cost incurred
..by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
to remove a nuisance structure from property located within
Indian River County, and describea as follows:
Lot 3, Block 6, Spruce Park Subdivision,
according to Plat thereof recorded in
Plat Book 1, page 80, of the Public
Records of Indian River County, Florida.
The name of the record owner of the above described property:
VIOLA YOUNG, her heirs and assigns
THIS LIEN is filed to secure the payment of ONE THOUSAND
FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-EIGHT AND 64/100 DOLLARS ($1,498.64), agains
the owner by the undersigned, for the costs of demolition and
removal against the real property.
THIS LIEN shall, from the date of filing, accrue interest
:at the 'rate of six percent (6%) uer annum, until the total
amount, including interest, has been paid.
atrick B. Lys s, Chairman
' l ! Board of Coun y C mmissioners of
Indian River�.Isbunty, Florida
Attest
Clerk
I'�a'�• %-.rt9 f♦♦thd., C L,rcuit Court
ft;B4W,%41 personally appeared PATRICK B. LYONS, as
Chairman, Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Jeanne Hine, Depuk'y Clerk on behalf of
Florida, and /FREDA WRIGHT, as Clerk of. the Circuit Court, to me
well known and known to me to be the persons described in and
who executed the foregoincj instrument and they acknowledged
before me thea• executed same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of
1981.
Notary P ic, State=
at Large. My Commis_ ijn eacpiwres e
••'U'LiC
JUL 151981iR;10. ' �''i,4 r
J
I
r
JUL 15 1981
CHANGE ORDERS
THE FOLLOWING CHANGE ORDERS SIGNED BY ADMINISTRATOR NELSON
PER COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION OF AUGUST 11, 1979, ARE HEREBY MADE A
PART OF THE MINUTES:
COURTHOUSE: N0. 24
CHANGE
ORDER
AIA DOCUMENT G701
OWNER
45
Li
ARCHITECT
No.
❑
CONTRACTOR
52
❑
FIELD
❑
OTHER
The
PROJECT: Indian River County
(name, address) Courthouse Bldg,
TO (Contractor)
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING: NO.
45
No.
46
No.
47
No.
52
No.
53
No.
54
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 24
7ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9364
Reinhold Construction Inc. CONTRACT FORAdditions & Renovations
P. o. Box 666
Cocoa, FL 32922
L_ CONTRACT DATE: 4/2/80
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
CP -45 Provide latch sets (no key, pushbutton)' for doors $369.68
229, 230, and 247 at the request of the owner.
The proposed changes in the work may result In additional time
required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time
will be added to the contract that is directly related to this change
order. The contractot will be paid for the additional required days
at the tate of$300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
costs. The number of days requested are not reflected in the attached
documents.
The
original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. S
689,000.03
Net
change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. S
153, 143.60
The
Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. $
842,143.60
The
Contract Sum will be 1increased)Xkl1(atBlA*dXMlXYrVd) by this Change.Order. .
. . S
369.68
The
new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . . .
. S
842,513.28
The
Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by
(- - - ) Days.
The
Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
r_QNNELL METCALF & EDDY
Iff 6o. Olxle Hlg`tway
Address
les. FL 331
DATE UW',
REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC
Address
Cocoa, FL 32922
DATE
60
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Z rkjR 14th Avenue
Address
Vero Beach, FL 32960
DATE l n -- L
M,
OWNER
CHANGE ARCHITECT
ORDERFo D RACTOR
®?
OTHER
,AIA DOCUMENT G
PROJECT: Indian River County
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER:45
(name, address) Administration Building _
TO (Contractor) --� ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:9363 .
Reinhold Construction Inc. CONTRACT FORAdditions and Renovations
p.o.Box 666
Cocoa, FL 32922 .
L CONTRACT DATE:4-2-80
you are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Provide adiition3l soffit work as described in Reinhold letter
of 3/10/81 and CO -20 in Rooms N130 and N157 -At owners request.
Cp-65 In the East wing south provide a door and frame, with
"C" label fire ratiog, for door S181 in the existing opening.
The existing opening measurements to be taken by the contractor
in the field and verified with the owner and the architect for
sizing of the door. At owners request,
Total
$415.6)
$940.22
$1,35592
Tbe proposed changes in the irkresulin additionaldditional ( time
requ i red .beyond, the contract completionte
me
will be added to the contract .that is directly related to this change
order. The contractot will be paid for the additional required -days
at the rate of$300.00.(three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
costs. The number of days requested are not reflected In the attached
documents.
The original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 2,748,000.00
;
Net change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 285,361.44 .
The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . • . • • • . . . • . , 35 $ 3,033,361.44
.
The Contract Sum will be (increased) Abd► :KK 0by this Change Order . . . � 3 03 11 , 717.82
The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . .. • - • - (_ Oays.
26
The Contract Time will be (increased) (decmased) (unchanged) by
The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
CONNELL METCALF b EDDY REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC.
ARCHITECT CO'NTRACTO
Tenn c_ n Lwl-p � t ghwa * P— n Rnw A;
Address Address
rnrit) Cables. FL 33134 Cocoa, FL 32922
BY.�C�
DATE YY//JJv'
®Y ` ,
I -
DATE C �,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
WO R 144h Ave
Addm%
Vero Beach,
�'. FL 329-60
ttY i� - t �&�
DATE ( r) — ), 0 —
AIA DC>CV AtNT CM • CHANCA 04*12 • APRIL 99i'PO EDITION • AIA® • 0 19" THE ONE PAGE
AMERICAN INSTITUTE CN ARCHITECTS, 17:S tr1W YOU AV[, MV, WASHINCTON. D.0 30,06
i
EOOK46 PAVE p'8
JUL 151981 61
r �
BOOK 6,WERS .
OWNER ❑
"HANGS ARCHITECT ❑
3RDER CONTRACTOR [j
FIELD
,IA DOCUMENT 0701 OTHER
ROJECT: Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 46
iame.address) Administration Building
0 (Contractor)
Reinhold Construction Inc.
P.o.Box 666
Cocoa, FL 32922
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:9363
CONTRACT FORAdd i t ions and Renovations
L 1 CONTRACT DATE:4-2-80
w are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
CP -82 Provide magnetic door holders for door .S201 and the necessary $1,214.87
electrical supply for the holders to funstion.At owners request.
2
he proposed changes in the w.)rk may result In additional time
equired beyond the contract completion date. Additional time
iii be added to the contract that Is directly related to this change
rder.-•The contractot will be paid for the additional required days
t the rate of$300.00.(three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
osts. The number of days requested are not reflected In the attached
acuments.
e original Contract Sunt was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % 2 , 748 , 000.00
A chang a ..,v previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 286,717.26
e Contrac Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,034,717.26
e Contract Sum• will be (increased) =W&W&*kX*ydWby this Change Order. . .$ 1,214.87
r new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,035,932.13
e Contract Ttime will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) icy (- - -) gays.
e Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
JNNELL METCALF & EDDY
CHITECi
320 Sam ntx1e Highwxay
dress
gyral
REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC.
CONTRACTO6
Vin nX65
Address
Cocoa. FL 32922
DATE
DOCUMENT GnI - CHANGE ORDER - AMIL 11'70 EDITION - AIA8 - ® 1970 - THE
LRICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 17is NEW yMK AVE., NW. WASHINGTON, D.C- 230%
r
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
owMsER
14th Ave
Address
Vero Beach, Irl 329GO
By
ONE FACE
�i�� OWNER
�a oP�iNG ARCHITECT
ORDER FIELD FIELD ❑
AIA DOCUMENT 0701 OTHER
PROJECT: Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 47
(name, address) Administration a u 11 d i ng
TO (Contractor)
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:9363
r Reinhold Construction Inc. CONTRACT FORAddit(ons and Renovations
P,A.Box 666
Cocoa, FL 32922
L J CONTRACT DATE: 4-2-80
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
CP -86 At the request of the owner provide electrical power to magnetic $2,139.32
holders for Corredor doors S140, S153, & S168.
The proposed changes In the work may result in additional time
required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time
will be added to the contract that Is directly related to this. change
order. The contractot will be palid for the additional required days
at the rate of$300.00.(three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
costs. The number of days requested are not reflected in the attached
documents.
The original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2 , 748 , 000.00
Net change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 287,932.13
.
The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . S 3,035,932.13
The Contract Sum will be (increased) CAMS14S tMW4by this Change Order . . . $ 2,139.32
The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . ... . . . . . . . S 3,038,071.45
i he Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( I Days.
The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
CONNELL METCALF b EDDY
ARCHITECT
132n Sa tt1vle HlChway.
4ddress
J
REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC.
CONTRACTOR
P n Rox 666
Address -
Cocoa, FL 32922
By
DATE ,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
QNVN
21458 14th Ave
Address ,
Vero Reach, FL 32960
sY�
DATE L d
T -
UA DOCUMENT GM ° CHANGE MDR • APRIL 7470 EDITION - AIA® 1970 - THE ONE PACE
NAALRICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C- MM
r
• F
BOOK46PACE-
JUL 15 198, 63
UL 15199`
6 PA � 5.
CHANGE'. OWNER. j]
ARCHITECT []
ORDER CONTRACTOR
FIELD '
AIA DOCUMENT 0701 OTHER
PROJECT:*Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER:52
(name, address) Administration Building .
TO (Contractor)
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:9363
• - Reinhold Construction Inc. CONTRACT €ORAddltlons and Renovations
- P.O.Box 666
Cocoa, FL 32922
�• CONTRACT DATE: 4 -2 -Bo
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
item #1
Provide for new door W129, as existing.hardware is not $1,302.63
suitable. At the oa:itrs.request to meet unforeseen.
conditions.
Jnr! proposed changes in the uric may result in additional time
::.Fred -beyond the -contract completion date. Additional time
wi)r be•added to the contract that i.s directly related to this change
order. --The contractot •wi l 1 be paid for the -additional -required slays
at the .rate off$300.00-(three hundred) per day for fixed overhead .
costs. The nuMber of days requested are not reflected in the attached
documents.
The original. Corttract Sura Was . ' . _ S 2 , 748 , 000.00
fMet change by previous Change Orders* . . . . ..S • 309,279.71
The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was. ... ' . _ . . . . . . 3,057,279-71
The Contract Sum Wiii be (increased) (d&f1(AMUMkM9dAy this Change Order. . S 1,302.63
The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be S 3,058,582.34
The Contract Time Will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( - -) Days.
The Date of Compietion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
CONNELL METCALF t EDDY REINNOLD CONSTRUCTION INC. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ARCHITECT COM•RACTO OWNER
__132n scl' n 1 M t e u�hwav R Q x ��5 14S 14th Ave
Address Address Address
ora abI es.4 Cocoa, EL 32922 Vero Beach FL 32960
Y ► 2V
ATE 7� 8� • DATE �— / G• _ J17 DATE,
AIA DOCUMINT CM fl CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1870 EDITION • AIA® • C IM ° THE ONE PAGE
AMIRICAN INSTITU71 Of ARCHITECTS. 1735 NEW YORK AVE, "W. WASHINCTON. D.C.
A
- M. M
CHANCE
WNER
AO CHITE&
i
{ ORDER
CONTRACTOR
FIELD
13
aGT07
OTHER
AIA DDCUAAENY
PROJECT: Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 53
dname.address) Administration Building
TO (Contractor)
FARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO.9363
teinhold Construction inc. CONTRACT FORAddttions and Renovations
•
p.0 Box 666
Cocoa, FL 32922
•L J CONTRACT DATE: 4-2-80
You are directed to snake the following changes in this Contract:
CP -89 • Provide 2 X 4.d15208na cel
l Ing
o,vnersthe
hallw�.y between $215.43
rooms S207 an panic $1,253.35
CP -92 'Provide the neeessa ry harda3re, including p
hardware for door W159 at the owners request.
CP -96 Replace door S156 with "A".label doors and frame.
Provide necessary hardware. Show credit for%*.>oj $363.60
doors in schedule, at the request of the owner
to. correct unforeseen condition. Total- —P
1,832.3
The proposed changes In the tnrlc awy result in additional time
required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time
will be'added to the contract Yhat 1s directly related to this change
order: -The contractor• will be paid for the additional required days
at the rate of$300.00 .(three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
costs. The slumber of days requested are not reflected in the attached
documents.
-The original Contract Sum WAS . ... . ' . . . . . . . . . . . S 2,748,000.00.24 , 71+8 , 000.00
wet change by previous Change Order; . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . $ 310,582. 24
The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 3,058,582.24
The Contract Sum will be (increased)X4Uer RXl h Xby this Change ®rder . . S 1 832.35
The new Contratt Sum Including this Change Order will be .. S 3,060:414.6 2 .
`The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by (- - - ) Days.
The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore Is •
REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC.
CONNELL METCALF t EDDY
ARCHITECT E01mle H ghway •
Address
CO0NTR
x o4r, •
Address
Cocoa FL 32922
13Y r� �
DATE ' ';7 % l
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
OWfIt
,2, VS .14th Aye -
Address
Vero Beach. FL _32960
ey -_'Sk�
DATE I-^
-AIA DOCUIN[NT CF09'• CHO= OADER • APRIL 9170 EDITION a AIA® • ® 9570 • 'THE ONE PAG[
AMERICAN INSTITUTE of ARCHITECTS, Ills NtW V021C AVE., NW, WASHINGTON. D.C- 20006
JUL 151981
U: Pic
87
AUL 15 1981
CA1NGE ' AOWNER CHITECT
ORDER CONTRACTOR
FIELD EJAIA DOCUMENT 0701 OTHER
PROJECT: Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUMBER:54
(narne,address) Administration Building
TO (Contractor)
. T-- ARCHITECT'S PROJECT N0:9363
Reinhold Constructlon Inc. CONTRACT FORAdditions and Renovations
P.O.Box 666.
Cocoa, PL 32922
"T DATE:
L J CONTRAC
You are directed to snake the following changes in this Contract:
CP -91 Replace doors 5125 and'S126 with 3' X•7' "B" label door aid $1,663.38
frame, aay hardware not covered previously by the hardware
schedule should be•included. Swing as shown on the drawings.
At the owners request.
The proposed changes in the wDrk may result in additional time
required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time
will be added to the contract that Is directly related to this change
order. --The eontraactof will be paid for the additional required Mays
at the rate of$300.00 .(three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
costs. The number of days requested are not reflected in the attached
documents.
-The original Contract Sum was . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 2,749,003.00
.
Net change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . $ 312,414.62
The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3,050,414. 2 .
Tim Contract Sum will be (increased) i ? s1S tZdi by this Change Order. . . S 1,663.38
Contrict Sum including this Change Order'Will be . . . . : to 3,062,078-00
I to Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) {unchanged) by (_ _ _) Days.
The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore Is
CONNELL METCALF t EDDY , REiNHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
.ARCHITECTCOPITRACTO ow ER
_1320 ntx?.a HIgbida%r P— Rnw ��iri S 14th �iVe
Address Address •. Addms
VeruBeach, �L 32960
Coral a s 4 Cocoa. -FL 32922 / n
my-
DATE
Y
DATE
DATE
DATE ' 1 • — -I
NG
•
'AIA DOCUMINT GM • CHA{ ORDER • Ana im Eon iow • AiA9 • ® IM - THE ONE CAGE
AAAERiCAN iH.TITUTE Of ACCHiTECTs.1735 NIw YORK AVE., Pavy, wASHINMON, DX- 2
ADMINISTRATORS AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN -30T PERMITS
RESOLUTION 81-43 AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN
PERMITS WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IS HEREBY MADE A PART
OF THE MINUTES AS APPROVED AT THE REGULAR MEETING, OF .JUNE 17, 1981,
P.OGK 6 PACF 889
JUL 151991 67
JUL 151981
Bch46 P U6
RESOLUTION NO. 81-43
WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION of the State of
Florida requests the County Administrator's authority within
Indian River County to sign certain right-of-way permits, and
WHEREAS, the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY finds it necessary and in the public interest for the
County Administrator to sign necessary permits for the DEPART-
MENT OF TRANSPORTATION without further authority,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County
Administrator is authorized to sign permits with the DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION pertaining to use of right-of-way, insUL11ati:on
of culverts, running of water lines or sewer lines;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator shall
sign such permits without further authority of the Board, it
being the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that routine
permits be handled and executed by the County Administrator.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
R
Attest:
Ffeda Wright V
Clerk of Circuit Court
Adopted: June 17, 1981
THE FOLLOWING CHANGE ORDERS SIGNED BY ADMINISTRATOR NELSON
PER COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION OF AUGUST 11, 1979, ARE HEREBY MADE A
PART OF THE MINUTES:
COURTHOUSE: N0. 25 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING: N0, 55
No, 56
RQO�b PAGE8.
JUL 151981 69 r
Fr'- JUL 15 R
.ice•
'F: .2 r• :j 1':
t s'
' ='l:: �•2i:
.2
!s
•r
CHANGE - OWNER
ARCHIT(CT
ORDER CONTRACTOR H
•11:1 DOC�Ua1(NI 6701 FIELD ❑
OTHER
PROJECT: Indian River County C(iAN(-,E ORDER NUMBER: 25
(name. address) Cburthouse Bldg,
10 iCortractor)
1 _ i` ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9364
Reinhold Construction Inc. CONTRACT FORAdditions & Renovations
P.0•Box 666
Cocoa, FL 32922
L CONTRACT. DATE: 4/2/80
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
CP -48 Provide a new exit light to interior double door in existing $369.51
courtroom at the request of the owner.
The proposed changes in the work may result in additional time
required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time
will be added to the contract that is directly related to this change
order. The contractot will be paid for the additional required days
at the rate ofS300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
costs. The number of days requested are not reflected in the attached
documents.
The original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 689,000.00
ti change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 153,513.28
Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 842,513.28
ontract Sum will be (increased) YMyAWXXMMKM by this Change Order $ 369.51
)VIA, Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . $ 842,882-79
•-ontract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( - -) Da��.
The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
CMELL -METCALF-1 -EDQY____.—.
APrr TE T
132 Eo` Dixie H igtiway
Add•ess
Coral -Ga les, FL 33134
BY
DATE 7
REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC INDIAN_ RIVER COUNTY
C� `Ri�x x656 - - --- 9'%�'+R 14 tt, Avenue -----
Address-------- --�--Address— ---- ----
Cocoa, FL 32922 Vero Beach, FL32960
BY
BY
DATE i ' DATE
D — !
t
AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA'S • 0 1970 - THE ONE PAGE
l.iERICAN 1'.STITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1715 NEW YORK AVE., NSV, WASHINGTON, D C. 20006
:p: :i: :iC::�T:Nli�:i: •1j.
IR
CHANGE ARC61T g
ARCF(TI CT
ORDER CONTRACTOR
FIELD ❑
AAA DOCL/RlENT G701 OTHER
PROJECT: Indian River County CHANGE ORDER NUNIMR: 55
(name. address) County Administration Bldg.
TO (Contractor)
ARCHITECT'S PROTECT NO: 963
Reinhold Construction Inc. CONTRACT FOR Additions and Renovations
P.O.Box 666
Cocoa, FL 32922
L CONTRACT DATE: 4/2/80
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract
Additional work (CO -20) for ceiling soffits -S106 $245.63
CP -102 Provide power to condenser water pump (P-6),new location. $653.67
CP -104 Provide existing door to fit (210'') opening at entry lobby,(door $523.12
from existing storage materials) and necessary hardware.
CP -106 Provide a starter 3/4HP motor for existing AHU #4 located $709.98
in the second floor equipment room in the east wing south,
Replace smoke detec-tor.
Total $T,-13240
The above requested by the owner to resolve problems in the
field that were unforeseen.
The proposed changes in the work may result in additional time
required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time
wlll be added to the contract that is directly related to this change
order. The contractot will be paid for the additional required days
at the rate ofS300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
costs. The number of days requested are not reflected in the attached
documents.
The original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2 , 748 , 000.00
Net change by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 314,078.00
The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . S 3,o62,078-00
The Contract Sum will be (increased)74ie'�(a4` X?diX'�(+16Xt14 by this Change Order S 2,132.40
The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be $ 3.064,210.40
The Contract Time will be (Increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by
The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
CONNELL
METCALF & EDDY
REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION INC,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
lWylEo,
Dixie Highway
CQQN77.O,Boxfix %66 _
P
°}1v � 14th Ave
Address
Coral Gables, FL 33134
Address
Cocoa, F1 32922
Address ,
Vero Beach, -FL
/
_32960
ey_"��"f
Z.X-:p Ir -1
BY
/J
v
DATE
DATE
DATE
AIA DOCUMENT G701 - CHANGE ORDER - APRIL 1970 EDITION - Arne?±: - 0 1970 • THE ONE PACE
AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20)06
8009 PACE
71
.yet:
•3 .S t- S�
`lam,
:t.
:1
V ••try•/♦J•�/�
riot' AGE
OWNER C1
ARCHITICT
®BOER
CONTRACTOR
FIELD [j
v•1i n0CU,%11,,17 G701
OTHER
I'Ri,t]ECT: Indian River County_ CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 56
(name address) County Administration Bldg.
10 (Contractor)
ARCHITECTS PROJECT No. 9363
Reinhold Construction Inc.
P•0•Box 666 CONTRACT FOR Additions and Renovations
Cocoa, FL 32922
L CONTRACT DATF 4/2/80
You are directed to make the follo%ving changes in this Contract -
CP -98 Provide a new opening in the south wall of room S148 per $1,443.48
attached documents and sketch. Item ;-2,at the owners request.
CP -99 Provide conduit from nearest telephone room to a point indicated 5943.64
by elevator co, to be used to provide a telephone connected to
Sherrifs department switchboard in each elevator ( telephone by
telephone co• and owner).At the owners request. _
Total $2't392.12
The proposed changes in the rwDrk may result in additional time
required beyond the contract completion date. Additional time:
will be added to the contract that is directly related to this change
order. The contractot will be paid for the additional required days
at the rate ofS300.00 (three hundred) per day for fixed overhead
costs. The number of days requested are not reflected in the attached
doeume:,ts.
The original Contract Sum was . . . . . . . . . , . . S 2 .748 , 000.00
ange by previous Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 316 , 2 10.40
:tact Sum prior to this Change Order was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,064,210.40
tract Sum will be (increased) by this Change Order $ 2,392.12
Contract Sum including this Change Order will be . . . . . . . . $ 3,o66,602.52
T"e Contract Time Kill be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by (- - - ) Dais.
The Date of Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore Is
CONNELL METCALF & EDDY
ItZ(TIjT-.- Dixie Highway
Address
Coral Gables, FL 33134
c. /
TATE %
REINHOLDF� CONSTRUCTION INC.
CQNI Box b66
Address
Cocoa, F1 32922
BY
DATE
AIA DOCUMENT 0701 • CHANGE ORDER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIAjr • C 197C • THE
A41E,,ICAN IN571TUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE , NW, wASHINCTOV, D C. 200%
72
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
9�N, 14th Ave _
Addre%s
Vero Beach, FL 329+60
DATE [ �� b
O*,E PACE
THE SEVERAL BILLS AND ACCOUNTS AGAINST THE COUNTY, HAVING
BEEN AUDITED, WERE EXAMINED AND FOUND TO BE CORRECT, WERE APPROVED AND
WARRANTS ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF SAME AS FOLLOWS: TREASURY FUND POS.
71261 — 71454 INCLUSIVE. SUCH BILLS AND ACCOUNTS BEING ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, THE WARRANTS SO ISSUED
FROM THE RESPECTIVE BONDS BEING LISTED IN THE SUPPLEMENTAL MINUTE
BOOK AS PROVIDED BY THE RULES OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR, REFERENCE
TO SUCH RECORD AND LIST SO RECORDED BEING MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES.
THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED
AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 4:15 O'CLOCK P.M.
ATTEST:
CLERK
JUL 151991 73
goo