Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/2/1981Wednesday, December 2, 198.1 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the City Hall Council Chambers, 1053 20th Place, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, December 2, 1981, at 8:30 o'clock A.M. Present were Patrick B. Lyons, Chairman; William C. Wodtke, Jr., Vice Chairman, Dick Bird; Alfred Grover Fletcher; and Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Also present were Neil A. Nelson, County Administrator; L. S. "Tommy" Thomas, Intergovernmental Coordinator; George G. Collins, Jr., Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; Jeffrey K. Barton, Finance Director; Dan (F Fleischman, Bailiff; and Janice Caldwell and' Virginia Hargreaves, Deputy Clerks. The Chairman called the meeting t(lJ,grder. Vice Chairman Wodtke led the Pledge fo f Allegiance to the Flag, and Reverend G. P. LaBarre gave the invocation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the Minutes of the Special Meeting of October 14, 1981. Commissioner Fletcher referred to Page 10, Line 20, and asked for clarification of the vote. Chairman Lyons suggested the Clerk check the tape. On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commis- sioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of October 14, 1981, subject to clarification of the tape. NEW ATTORNEY Chairman Lyons introduced the new County Attorney, Gary Brandenburg, and welcomed him on board. DEC 2 1981 48 aa"M DEC % 1951 ADDITIONS TO AGENDA agenda. BOOK 48 PACE -225 The Chairman asked if there were any additions to the Chairman Lyons requested adding an item regarding packets for the Press. On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commis- sioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the addition of the emergency item as requested by Chairman Lyons. CONSENT AGENDA A. MAINTENANCE BOND - WESTWIND SUBDIVISION The Board reviewed the following memorandum: _TO: The Honorable AZembers of the DATE: November 18, 1981 FILE: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Neil A. Nelson, County Administrator DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS SUBJECT: Request for Release of Maintenance Bond - Westwind Subdivison REFERENCES: Earl T. Spytek to Neil Nelsor. Letter: dated Nov. 2, 1981 Earl T. Spytek, owner, is requesting release of a $2000. cash maintenance bond which is currently being held in the County's Escrow Account for seeding of Westwind Subdivision. This bond was requested by the County Staff'and-approved by the Board on October 21, 1981. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Inspection of Westtaind Subdivision on Nov. 17, 1981 by the County Engineer revealed that grassing has germinated and that all work is complete. RECONrAENDATIONS AND FUNDING It is recommended that the Baord approve release of the $2000. maintenance bond being held in the County's Escrola Account as requested. On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commis- sioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the release of the $2,000 maintenance bond for Westwind Subdivision. B. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CLEAN-UP DAY The Board reviewed the following memorandum: TO: Board of County Commissioners ®ATE: November 20, 1981 FILE: FROM: Neil A. Nelson County Administrator SUBJECT: Boy Scouts of America Clean-up Day REFERENCES: The order of the Arrow, local chapter of honor Boy Scouts have requested by attached letter County support for their clean-up campaign December 3, through 6th. Descriptions and conditions John Schlitt, Jr., Oklawaha Camp C= -d ttea Member of the Boy Scouts has requested that the County spot one of our containers at their camp ground December 3rd, 1981. A work weekend has been scheduled for December 3, through 6th. The County does have an extra container that could be used for this purpose. The Boy Scouts of America would be responsible or their land fee estimated to be On one other occasion the County has spotted a container for a community clean-up project. Recommendation It is recommended that; 1) The County spot one large container at the Oklawaha Scout Camp on December 3rd, through 7 December. 2) Landfill fee be paid by the Boy Scouts of America. On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the request of John Schlitt, Jr. as outlined in the above memorandum. OEC 2 1981c - TOF HOUSING AUTHORITY - PAYMENT VOUCHER The Board considered the following memorandum: TO: Jeff Barton ®ATE: November 19, 1981 F1 LE: Director of Finance SUBJECT: Execution of HUD Form 52681, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions �7 FROM: Edward J.,_aega REFERENCES: It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the County Commission. In accord with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations, our Section 8 Rental Housing Assistance Program is required to submit a HUD Form 52681, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions at the close out of each fiscal year to the Regional Accounting Division in Atlanta, Georgia for a year-end settlement. The state- ment shows a balance due to the County of six thousand, one hundred seventy-one and 00/100 dollars ($6,171). We are also required to send a copy to the HUD Jacksonville Office along with HUD Forms 52682, Operating Statement; and Form 52595, Balance Sheet. These reports were prepared by our Program Accounting Clerk, and the Assistant Finance Director. They require the approval of the County Finance Director. I respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute HUD Form 52681. Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Bird, that the Board approve the HUD Forms 52682, 52595, and 52681, and authorize the signature of the Chairman for Form 52681. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR HUD USE ONLY VOUCHER FOR PAYMENT OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM I' (Voucher Number) ' SECTION 23 [- SECTIONS IT i I (See Instructions on reverse) FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDS[ 9/30/81 PUBLICNOU IN AGENCY n0, • Indian River County Board of County AC CONTRACT NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER 1 Commissioners, 800, 20th Place, Suite 3 Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 A-3409 FL -29-E132-001 HUD FIELD OPOWETYPE Peninsular Plaza, 661 Riverside Ave., Jacksonville, Fla. 32204 OF PROJECT (Check One)BEGINNING i--� NEW 0 gENAB L.� EXISTING � DATE OF FIRST FISCALVEAR 7/1/79 HUD REGIONAL OFFICE 75 Spring Street, S.W. Atlanta, Ga. 30303 NU#ABER OF DWELLING UNITS NUMBER OF UNIT MONTHS 552 uNOER Acc UNDER (EASE 126 102 Regviest is hereby state fair the payment of annual coatribntiets payable plirsltant to the terms ed Annual ConIlrib"jefts cataract for the project Bad the fiscal Yew shown above, as set forth and conditions of the above number- in the following statement: REQUESTED ®v PHA HUD ADJUSTMENTS 131 MAXIMA ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AVAILABLE I. tibximum Annual Contribution Au troriz� - pet Arun)al Contri Contract 2. Pro Rata Nniaelm Amuel Contribution Applicable to a Period of Less Than Two Ive (12) Months 3. Maximum Annual Cgritribution For Fiscal Year (Lips 1 &W 2) 4. COdiWq ResefWAccouat 2823) for Sectioq 23 projects or Protect Account (Account 2827) for Section 8 projects - Balance at beginning of Fiscal Yew 1 S. Total Annual Contributions Available (Lines 3 and 4) 225,204 -' 2 2.5, _.- 178,139 _AP ROV ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS REQUIRED ANNUAL �TIONs 6. housing Assistance Payments(Aca-�,nt 4715) 7. Administrative Fee (See instructions) 8. Preliminary Administrative Expense - Prior to ACC (Acer. 401o) 9. Preliminary Administrative Expense - After ACC (Acct. 4012) 10. Nonexpe dable Equipwt (Accounts 7527 and 750) 11. Security and Utility Deposit fund (Section 23 Projects oily) 12. Independent Public Accountant Audit Costs 2,500 13. Total Funds Required - Current Year (Lines 6 Ik=%4 12) 14. Deficit at End of Preceding Fiscal Year 1.. - , 183,722 15. Total Funds Required (Lines 13 and 14) 299,188 16. Project Receipts oft that+ Annual Contributions (Aects. 3610, 3590, and 7530) 183.722 17. Total Ardal Contributions Required (Line 15 ejaus Line 161 183,722 EXCESS OR DEFICIT IN ANNUAL CONTRIZUTIONS AVAILAOLE 18. Excess (Amowtt by smirch we S exceeds Line 17) 19. Deficit (Asa wet by touch Line 17 exceeds Line 5) 1 YEAR-END SETTLEMENT 20. Annual Contributions Due for Fiscal Year(Line 17 minus Line 19) 21. Total Partial Payments Received by PHA for Fiscal Year 22. Underpayment Dire PHA (,4mount by uAich Line 20 exeeeis Line 21) 23• Owrpeyment Due HUD (Aaaount by which Line 21 exceeds Linc 20) Fi , 177,551 6,171 STATUS OF PROJECT ACCOUNT (Section8 24. Project Accvtart - Balance at the End of Fiscal Year (Account 2827) (Line 18) 25. Provision for Project Account (Account 7027) '621 219 a. Increase (Anwaant by which Line 24 exceeds Line 4) b. DeCrellSe(Amount by which Line 4 exceeds Line 24) 41,482 STATUS OR CONTINGENCY RESERVE (Section 23 Protects only)' 26. Contingency Reserve - Balance at the End of Fiscal Year (Account 2825) (Line 18 or 10% of Line 1, whichever is lesser) 27. Provision for Contingency Reserve - (Aceaitost 7o25) a. • InclMe (Amount by which Line 26 exceeds Line 4) b. Decrease (Anwist t by which Line 4 exceeds Line 26) STATUS OF SECURITY AND UTILITY DEPOSIT FUND (Section 23 projects only) 28. Security 8W Utility Deposit Feuds Provided, Account 2168.1 29. Security and Utility Deposits - Uncoltectible Advances, Account 2168.2 30. Balance of Security and Utility Deposit Fund ( Lane zx „Imus (i,ve 29) 31. Accounts Receivable - Advances for Security am Utility (Deposits Account 1127 32. Securi and Utili Deposit Funds Available (Lt.. - .30 minus Line 31) -- -i- l -----` -- -- - --- -- I CERTIFY that 11010410@ sseiagwce payments have bona or will be Slade eve with mss housing eeslstewee Only peat a Scurfs whicbt (I) ace under lease by Families of the floe such 9 payment$ ors made a"sopa es Otherwise provided is " Housing AosislSase Poysnents Contracts and (2) the Housing Agency hos, within ono Year prier to the matting at tusk hewsiwg essletwKs paytaeats, adequately inspected or coward to be Inepecsed (/nctudind inspection of drotaIde, facilities, anti Braes for the taaeflf and use of the Famillos) to esswre that deswht, sale end senitery housing occomoderions we being provided; that all applicable provisions Of the above aasebeted Annual Contributions Contract have besw 46101slad with by aha Movai Agency; c. i shot this Voucher for Annual Contribution* has boon "Stained `11 she ori to the beat Si my knowledge send belies It k, Uwo, cetrsrt cad swpla Indian River County Board of ('slog rumml cQionprs / (Nave of Public Nowaind Adency) (� litgnotre fl a of Official Authorloed to Cerilfr_) ;FOR REG A - CNECK ONE: REVIEWED aMc L t• • _ Overpayment of SHA i -1 t 2. r_ Unde"ymert r a fi nt to Dano) the pHA on (enter date certified). y� HU52682 Mob"- U.S. DEPA MENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN JELOPMENT OPERATING STATEMEN HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM SECTION 23 ❑ SECTION B ® SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE STATE CODE TYPE OF PROJECTISI^ FY ENDING 191 (Cheek one) (Check one) EXISTING 01 ® ❑ c MAR. 31 , 1 I NEW 02 C] 2, 0 JUNE 30 REHAB. 03®Q 3. ® SEPT. 30 4. DEC. 31 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY flncludtng "Ill' Code) ndian River County Board of County Commissioners 00, 20th Place, Suite 3 ero Beach, F1a.32960 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS NUMBER OF UNIT MONTHS AC CONTRACT NO. A-3409 PROJECT NUMBER(S) FL -29-E132-001 UNDER ACC 126 UNDER LEASE 102 552 LINE NO. ACCT. NO. T ACCOUNT TILE ACTUAL PUM F AMOUNT PART 1 OPERATING RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES 010 020 030 040 050 060 070 080 090 100 110 120 130 140 _ 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 3610 3690 7530 8025or 8026 4715 4010 4012 7520 7540 4110 4130 4150 4170 4180 4190 4400 4510 4530 4540 4590 6010 OPERATING RECEIPTS Interest on general fund investments Other Income Total Operating Income (Lines 010 and 020) Receipts from nonexpendable equipment not replaced Total Operating Receipts, exclusive of annual contributions (Lines 030 and 040) Annual Contributions Earned Total Operating Receipts (Lincs 050 and 060) OPERATING EXPENDITURES Housing Assistance Payments, Prelim. Admin. Exp., and Nonexpendable Equip. Housing Assistance Payments Preliminary administrative expense -Prior to ACC Preliminary administrative expense - After ACC Replacement of nonexpendable equipment Property betterments and additions Total Housing Assistance Payments, Preliminary Admin. Exp., and Nonexpendable Equipment (Lines 080 thru 1210) Total Operating Receipts Available for the Regular Costs of Admin. (Line 070 minus Line 130) Administrative Expense: Administrative salaries Legal expense Travel Accounting and auditing fees Office rent Sundry Administrative Expense Total Administrative Expense (Liner 150 thru 200) Other Expense: Maintenance and Operation (for nonexpendable equipment only) Insurance Terminal leave payments Employee benefit contributions Other General Expenses Total Other Expense (Lines 220 thru 260) Total Admin. and Other Expenses (Lines 210 plus Line 270) Prior Year Adjustments Affecting residual receipts (or deficit) - debit (credit) Total Expenses for the Regular Cost of Admin., including prior year adjustments (bine 280 plus the debit or minus the credit on Line 290) NET INCOME (OR DEFICIT) before provision for operating reserve (Line 140 minus Line 300) ; 333 183,797 333 183,722 288 158.961 288 158,961 45 24,761 44 24,392 _ 4 2,167 1 49 271-094 1 671 1 350 10 5,772 4 2,076 16 8,869 65 35,963 65 35,963 20 (11,202) PART 11 ANALYSIS OF OPERATING RESERVE (All Section 23 IMP Projects or All Section 8 HAP Projects 10,751 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 2824or 2826 7014or 7016 2S24or 2826 Operating Reserve - Balance at beginning of fiscal year covered by this statement Cash Withdrawals from Reserve during fiscal year covered by this statement Net Operating Reserve after Cash Withdrawals (Line 320 minus Line 330) Net Income (or Deficit) before provision for operating reserve (net total of Line 310 for all IIAP projects) Net Deficit brought forward from preceding fiscal year (see Line 410 of Analysis of Operating Reserve for preceding fatal ),ear) Total Income (or Deficit) (See instructions) Provision for Operating Reserve Addition (the amount of income, if any, on Line 370) Deduction,tha tanounto(dcfteit,if any,onLthe 37'),butnut to rtcredthe anutunton1.ina7 0) Operating Reserve - balance at end of fiscal year covered by this statement (Line 340 plus Line 380 or minus Line 390, as applicable) Deficit at end of fiscal year covered by this statement, if any (Line 370 minus Line 390) 10,751 (11,202) 11,202 451 PREPARED BY (Signature),! )/ AHPRUVEO BY (StgMrure r—' - DATE i Hance Di r for �c L I cage 1 Cf 1 m mabr4wir 19:6 US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVEL0P1-'i, •T LOW INCOME HOUSING PROGRAM BALANCE SHEET .Cee hnlrtrrtwn% mi the Ilererve. O z Lu z_ J 1 3 4 5 1122 1 124 1125 1127 1 1'_t) 1130 1145 1311155 14 1156 15 1157 1h 1162 17 1163 1171 1 17' Il'' 1174 1176 11177 30 i 14002 1 1.300..+ 32 11400.4 33 ' 1510 34 1620 36 f 1830 37 1 3S 1860 1870 ASSETS 71 C HOUSING AGENCY Indian River County LOCAL1Tv ------ ----- — - Vero Beach, -Fla. 32960 PERI )D ENDED Sept. 30, 1981 CONTRACT NUMBER A-3409 PROJECT NU11113ER151 FL -29-E132-001 CASH General Fund Mi'vef„ Pnu"+it uticl/(,r Operutt„rll . . . . . . . . . —('451) I I General fund (f'napplit•J Debt Service /-und%) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Security Deposit Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pette Cash Fund . . . . . . . . — ('hange Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — ACCOUNTS RE(TIVABLE Tenants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . Ilonrebuvers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HUD................. ............. Advances for Security and Utility Deposits 01 leer ..................... .............. NOTES AND MORTGAGES RECEIVABLE. . . . . ... ..................... ACCRULD INTEREST RECEIVABLE : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ADVANCI-S l.inlited Revolving Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Unlimited Revolving Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . ... . . . Other........................... ........ INVFSTSIE\TS General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Homeuwnershlp Reserve Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DEBT AMORTIZATION FUNDS Debt Service Fund .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Advance Annlrtiiation Fund . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued Interest Receivable - Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HUD Annual Contributions Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dejx)sils with HUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DEFERRED CHARGES Prepaid Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Insurance Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !Maintenance Work in Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories - Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inlentolles - Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Otller.................................... I AND. SFRUCTURL:S AND EQUIPMENT 1" t'!opinettt Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Cs" Development Cost - Contra . . . . . . . . . _ Land, Sit uctures and Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PAYN11 NFS I.OR OFF-SITE IITIL-ITIFS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . UNDIS1 RIBITI.D DEBITS Ineligible F\pendittiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1311) GUARA`I lI S Undepo,,ited [lid Guaranties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less. Returnable Bid Guaranties - Contra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ADVAMTS FOR DLBT AMORI'IZ-ATION Ad%ances tient General Fund to Debt Service Fund . . . .. . . . . . . . less. Retunds Due General Fund from Debt Service Fund - Contra . . . . 2'1 TOTAL ASSETS 4 51� -- --- -- - Itlttr l.eneral I and in, iudeN i None representing pro.eed%from disposition of pn,prrt% reserved for reptacement of equipment or 1.,1 other pwp,%c%as pn,%ided in thr annual tunlnbuUuo> „r rdnimistrrtlun uu,tract EC 2 1991 NOTE: Accrued annual leave of employees at the end of the fiscal year $ 1. 037 _ Pape 2 of 2PU$UC MOUSING AGENCY F;ruall 1976 _lndia�River. BALANCE SHEET coNrRACT NUMBER _ A-3409 rAIOD ENDED 9/30/81 Z O LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 40 2111 Vendors and Contractors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 2112 —_ Contract Retentions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 2113 . . . . . . . . . . Performance Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — 43 2114 Tenants Security Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2118 . . . . . . . . 11 UD (Accts. 2118.1, 211<5'. & 2118.6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Other (Accounts 211.5, 2117 & 2119) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOTESPAYABLE 46 2122 Project Loan Notes - HUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 47 2123 Administrative Notes - HUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 2126 Project Notes - Non -HUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2129 Sundry Notes . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ACCRUED LIABILITIES 50 2131.1 Interest Payable - Development Notes and Bonds - HUD . . . . . . . . 51 2131.2 Interest Payable - Administrative Notes - HUD .. . . . . . .. . .. . . 52 2 13 1.3 Interest Payable - Other Notes (Deferred Pati'ment) HUD . . . . ... . . 53 2132 Interest Payable - Notes -Non-HUD .. ... ... .. ... ...... . 54 2133 Interest Payable - Bonds - Non -HUD ......... ... ... .. . 55 2137 Payments in Lieu of Taxes . .. .. ... .. .. .. .. . 56 Other (Accts. 2134, 2135, 2136 & 2139) ...... . .. ..... . . TRUST AND DEPOSIT LIABILITIES 57 2161 Homebuyers Ownership Reserve .. . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . .. . . 58 2162 Homebuyers Nonroutine Maintenance Reserve . . .. . . . .. . . . . . 59 2165 Mortgagors Taxes and Insurance . .. .. . .. . .. . . . . . . ... . . 60 2166 Mortagors Maintenance Reserve . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . . 61 2168 Annual Contributions for Security and Utility Deposit Funds Provided DEFERRED CREDITS 62 2210 Prepaid Annual Contribution .. .. . ... ... .. . .. .. . . . . . _ 63 2240 Tenants Prepaid Rents . . ... ... ... .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . 64 2241 Prepaid Monthly Payments - Homebuyers . .. . .. ... .. . .. . . 65 2250.1 Investment Income - Homebuyers Ownership Reserve - Unapplied . . . . .. . .. . .. . . 66 2250.2 Investment Income - Homebuyers Ownership Reserve - Applied . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . ( ) 67 2251.1 Investment Income - Homebuyers Nonroutine Maintenance Reserve - Unapplied .. . . . . . 68 2251.2 Investment Income - Homebuyers Nonroutine Maintenance Reserve - Applied . . .. . .. . . 69 2290 Other ... . . . .. ... . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . _ FIXED LIABILITIES 7.0 2311 Permanent Notes - HUD . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 2321 . . . . Series "A" Notes and Bonds Issued -.. . 72 2322 Series "A" Notes and Bonds Retired . . .. . . ( ) 73 2331 Series "B" Notes and Bonds Issued .. . . . . . 74 2332 Series "B" Notes and Bunds Retired . . . . . . . ( ) 75 2341 New Housing Agency Bonds Issued .. . . . . . 76 2342 New Housing Agency Bonds Retired . . . .. . . ( ) 77 2351 Other Notes Payable to HUD (Deferred) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONTRACT AWARDS 78 1810 Contract Awards - Contra . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 79 1800 . . . . . . . . Less: Uncompleted Contracts . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . 80 TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 81 2810 Unreserved Surplus . .. . .. . .. ... . . . . (451) 82 2820 Operating Reserve - Locally Owned Projects . . . 83 2821 Operating Reserve - Leased Projects . . . . . . . 84 2823 Operating Reserve - Homeownership Projects 85 2824 Operating Reserve - Section 23 HAP Projects 86 2825 Contingency Reserve - Unfunded Sect. 23 1tAP Proj. 87 2826 Operating Reserve - Section 8 HAP Projects . . . 88 2827 _ Project Account - Unfunded - Sect. 8 HAP Projects . 89 Total Surplus from Operations . . . . . . . . 90 2840 _ Cumulative HUD Annual Contributions . . . . . 91 28i0 Cumulative Donations . . . . . ---_ (42 '_1-55 Cunv-datoe Prviceeds from Site '�f Uwe!l:^as y: 2:+jo iunlwative Lonumuth,ns t)) titonlenu)ers lot Ptopert) -- — -_--- --- --- 941 2'860 Book Value of Projects Conveyed by HUD . . —_--- 95 2570 less Contract Payments to HUD--�-- 't6 2880 Development Cosi - Undeveloped Projects — _. . . - . - - 07 2590 . Book Value of Capital Assets Conveyed to Homebuyers ( OR _1 TOTAL SURPLUS AND LIABILITIES PREPj1,Rj D BY S,gmal irej } — I,TLE Asst.0 Oce Director _PPR{) ED BY DATE------- TLE TE 11/12/ __ Finance [� rector ll�a40A/ HOUSING AUTHORITY - SECTION 8 The Board reviewed the following memorandum dated November 19, 1981: TO: i:eil A. Nelson, County Administrator DATE: November 19, 1981 FILE: SUBJECT: Requisition for the second Quarterly Payment FY 82 of Annual Contributions Contract - Section 8 Existing Housing Rental Assistance Program. FROM:REFEREN E Edward J. (Regan j C' S' Housing and" Community Development Director It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the County Commission. In order to requisition funds quarterly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to operate our Section 8 Housing Assistance Program; we are required to submit four (4) executed copies of HUD form 52663. This is consistent with our Annual Contributions Contract en- tered into on December 30, 1978. The current contracts terms expire June 30, 1984. I respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to execute the four copies of HUD form 52663 for the second quarterly payment. We have had 578 applicants for the program and are currently giving rental assistance to 105 families. This program has been funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to assist 126 families in the amount of $329,664 for fiscal year 1982. The fiscal year 1982 County budget allocation is $3,432. Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Bird, for the Board to approve Quarterly Payment FY 82 of the Annual Contributions Contract - Section 8, and authorize the signature of the Chairman. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. DEC 2 innIflaw. 48 9 y,,9 F",_ JO -526C13 5 "nQ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN U:_VtLOPMENT Y WWo�UUn (f1�il REQUISITION FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTiOtilS - - HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PRO_iRAN1 Voucher Number SECTION 23 l__J S'cCTIC.'V S F i Dole of Requisition 11/17/81 FitC31 Year Ending Date 9/30/82 _ For Quarter Ending 3/31/82 f `LAME AND ADDRESS OF PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY (Inciuding 7,Ip Ludt) Indian River Board of County Commissioners 800, 20th Place, Suite 3, Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 ACC Contract Number .._ -3409 FL -29-F`132-001 Project Number F1: - No. of Months In Fiscal Year _ 12 jYPeofProjest: DEPOSITARY BANK (Nonce, Address and Account Number) Tile First Bankers of Indian River County 11ruro Beach, Fla. 32960 Acct. #98-0+000-1�ExISTINa NEW REHAB. a. Number of Units Under Lease to Eligible Families as of Date of Requisition 105 b. i:stimated Number of Units to be under Lease at End of Requested Quarter 126 c. Average Monthly Housing Assistance Payment Per Unit as of Date of Requisition 165 DESCRIPTION (I) ESTIMATE OF REQUIRED ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS (2) TOTAL COST INCURRED TO DATE (3) ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL COST ENO Or REQUUESTED QUAL{TER (4) CUMULATIVE TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED, (S) PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE 1. Preliminary Administrative Expense—Prior to ACC (Account 4010) 0 0 0 2. Preliminary Administrative Expense—After ACC (Account 4012) 3. Total Preliminary Administrative Expense (Lincs I & 2) NONEXPENDABLE EQUIPMENT 4. Replacement of flonexpendable Equipment (Account 7520) ` 5. Property Betterments and Additions (Account 7540) 6. Total Nonexpendable Equipment (Litres 4 & 51 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS 7. Housing Assistance Payments (A ecount 4715) 329,664 34,673 79,695 114,368 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE 8. Total Administrative Fee Approved for Fiscal Year 39.3-17 9. Monthly Rate of Administrative Fee (Linc 8 divided by number of months in fiscal year) ---3,277 10. Amount Previously Requisitioned for fiscal year 9.832 9,832 11: Estimated Additional Amount Required to end of Requested Quarter 19.664 12. Total Administrative Fee (Lincs 10 & I1) INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT AUDIT COSTS (Scc:ron 8 orl),/ 13. Total Independent Public Accountant Audit Custs 2,500 SECURITY AND UTILITY DEFC-SIIS (S: ction 23 orlr) 14. Total Allowance Approved for Security and Utility Deposits 0 15. Amount Previously Requisitioned for fiscal Year 0 0 115. Estimated Additional Amount RequirrAl to End ci Requested Quarter 0 It Total Security and Utility Deposits (Lines 15A 16) AMOUNT OF THIS REQUISITION ' X la. Total Funds Requited to End of Requested Quarter (Lincs 3, 6, 7, 12, l3,& 17) 134,032 1. Total Partial Payments Received for Fiscal Year to Date 61.220 20. Partial Payment Requested (Line 19 minus line 19) IST INSTALLMENT 2ND INSTALLMENT 3RD INSTALLMENT TOTAL METHOD OF PAYMENT 21. Requested Installment Payments 20,407 I CERTIFY that housing assistance payments have been cc will bo made only with rrrs-.9ct to units which- (1) are under lease by Families at the time such housing a=irtance payments are made excopt as otherwise provided in the Housing A-%otarwe Payments Contracts and (2) the Housing Agency has within one year prior to the making of such housing aristnnce paymants..ndequately inspm.t v-1 or cursed to bo inspected (including inspection of grounds, facilities. and areas for the benefit and use of the Famiiiez) to e=re that decent, safe and sans,, ry i-.ousing accommodations are being provided; that all applicable pro- visions of the above numbered Contract have been complied with by the Housing A ys.r.y; and that this retluitition for annual contributions has been sxsm- inod by me and to the best of my knowittdge and beliaf it is true, corract and comp;vta. Indian River County Board of County onerg of Public Uousii ncyl / (Dart-) gn o // ' It u honied to Grti/y) HUD FIELD OFFICE APPROVAL 1J (Signaiurr and Tule of Official Authorized to Approve) (Datr) ..EGIONAL ACCOUNTING DIVISIUN ' ( Plevalidatsd by: PAYMLNT FOR MON I H OF AMOUNT PAID DATE CERTIFIED FOR PAYMENT CERTIFIED BY (Initials) (Sirinoture) (Date) TOTAL ReplacesW_ID-52663 dat. Jure 19'f i. _ HUD -52663 B AUT17ORIZATION FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION REGARDING ARCHITECT'S APPEAL Attorney Collins requested the Board to"hire the same attorney from West Palm Beach that they have used in the past. From a time and travel standpoint, it was worth the expense to have his expertise on this particulat'appeal - the last appeal cost approximately $1,000. On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commis- sioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized the,County Attorney to arrange for legal representation for the Architect's appeal in the current suit. REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE OWNED BY REV. WILLIE JONES The Board discussed the following memorandum: DEC 2 1981 4103 mrE 234- 11 DEC 2 "1981 pooK 48 PAGE -23.5 TO: The Honorable Board of ®ATE: November 24, 1981 FILE: County Commissioners SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE BELONGING TO REV. 14ILLIE JONES FROM: Neil Nelson REFERENCES: County Administrator DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: The structure is located on property in the northwest corner of U.S. #1 and South Gifford Road Intersection, at 2190 41st Street and belongs to Rev. Willie Jones. There are residential and commercial buildings to the west, north and south; U.S. #1 to the east. The building continues to be neglected and is in a dilapidated condition and presents a continual eye -sore to the community. Rev. Jones requested an extension which was given to him by the Board on October 21, 1981, for 30 days for his compliance and a letter of instruction was delivered to Rev. Jones informing him of the Board's decision. The Zoning inspectors have inspected the property and reported that there are no signs of improvement to the subject property. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: (A) Initiate action which would result in the removal of this Hazardous structure. This would help clean up the neighbor- hood and remove a potentially dangerous situation to the Health, Safety and Welfare of the neighborhood. (B) Not to approve the removal of the structure. If this alter- native is selected, the building would continue to deteriorate and present an unsafe situation and will be a continual eye- sore to the community. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the County Commissioners authorize staff to proceed with removal of the structure. The following action needs to be taken in order to initiate resolution of the problem. The following procedures for having structures removed will be init4 ated after an affirmative vote by the Board of County Commissioners, ACTION BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY: (A) This will require the County Attorney to prepare all legal doc- umentation to support the remoy_al of said building. (B) This will require the County Attorney to notify the County Administrator's office that all legal action has been completed. ACTION BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: (A) County Administrator will, within seven (7) days after notice from county Attorney, instruct the Road and Bridge work crew to remove structure or items. (B) The County Administrator will determine the cost of removal and notify the owner in writing of the amount of cost. FOLLOW-UP ACTION BY ATTORNEY: (A) If payment from the owner or owners has not been received after thirty (30) days from written notice by the A&-iinistrator, the County Attorney will cause a lien to be placed against the property. On Motion by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously agreed to give Rev. Willie Jones a 30 day extension before proceeding with removal of the structure. REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE - DAVIS TEMPLE The Board discussed the following memorandum by the County Administrator: DEC 2 1981 13 Box 48fACE --DEQ 2 11981 WK TO: The Honorable Board of DATE: November 24, 1981 FILE: County Commissioners j SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT ON DAVIS TEMPLE CHURCH OF GOD - HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE FROM: Neil Nelson REFERENCES: County Administrator DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: This letter -is intended to show the progress made toward repair or removal of the burned structure belonging to Davis Temple Church of God - 3446 45th Place. The Indian River County Commission Board gave the church group 30 days extension of time to show some real progress in correcting the condition of the building. We requested that they clean up the piles of burned trash which been placed in front and back of the building and to board up the building so that children would not have the opportunity of playing within the building and vagrants would be unable to use it as a temporary shelter. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: (A) Initiate action which would result in the removal of the structure. This would help clean up the neighborhood and remove a potentially dangerous situation to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood. (B) Not to approve the removal of this structure. If this alter- native is selected there is a possibility that the building would continue to deteriorate and present an unsafe situation and be a continued eye -sore to the community. RECO�NDATIONS: As Total Development has made progress in developing a blueprint drawing showing the renovq;tion of the building, (prints attached) the staff recommends a 90 day extension of time so that further, complete prints can be processed through the Zoning -and the Building Departments. The staff further recommends that if no real progress has been made within 90 days, that this item be brought back to the Board's attention for possible removal. On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously agreed to give a 90 day extension to Rev. Davis, and instructed that the Board receive a 30 day report concerning the matter. � s � BID NOS. 103, 104 AND 105 The Board read over the Bid Recommendations by the County Administrator: - TO: Chairman, Board of DATE: November 20, 1981 FILE: County Commissicners SUBJECT: Bid Recommendations FROM: Chairman REFERENCES: Bid Committee 1. A public meeting was held at 11:00 A.M., November 17, 1981 in the County Administrator's Office, 2345 14th Ave, Vero Beach, F1. This meeting was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal on Oct. 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 1981. 2. The purpose of this meeting was to open and record the following bids: IRC 4103 - (1) Motor Grader IRC x104 - (1).Front End Laoder IRC 7105 - Diesel Porter Unit 3. IRC 7103 - (1) Motor Grader IRC 7104 - (1) Front End Loader The Bid Committee recommends these bids be held in abeyance until the Board meeting of December 16, 1981. This will give the committee ample opportunity to fully analyze all bids received. 4. IRC 7105 - Diesel Power Unit 6 Bid Proposals sent out, 4 received (1 No Bid) Coastal Power Products Allis Chalmers Minton Equipment Kelly Tractor $10,360.00 9,718:00 11,500.00 No Bid The Bid Committee recommends this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Allis Chalmers. Fund Account 7102-214-541-66-49 Administrator Nelson requested that Bids 103 and 104 be deferred until the next Board meeting. Discussion followed about the equipment. It was suggested that the amount of money budgeted be listed in the bid recommendations in the future. DEC 2 1981 AD% 48 15 WK bEC 2 1981 On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commis- sioner Bird, the Board unanimously accepted the Bid of Allis Chalmers for a diesel power unit, as being the lowest and best bid meeting specifications, in the amount of $9,718, Fund Account #102-214-541-66-49. MODEL AIRPLANE CLUB - REQUEST TO FLY THEIR PLANS Administrator Nelson requested this item be deferred until the next meeting. PLANNING OF NEW INSTITUTIONS SEMINAR - REPORT Chairman Lyons gave a brief verbal report on his recent trip to attend the Planning of New Institutions Seminar where the various operations of a jail were discussed. The Chairman recommended that the Board send two people to attend the next symposium to be held in January; the money could be used from the Sheriff's Educational Fund. One person could be a Commissioner and the other a member of the Public Safety Committee, possibly Mr. Wheeler. Chairman Lyons advised that he would issue a full written report regarding the seminar by the end of the week. Chairman Lyons requested the authority to send two people to the seminar in January. Discussion followed, and it was decided to defer the request. In the meantime, it could be determined if funds in the amount of $2,000 would be available for this matter. PRESS PACKETS Chairman Lyons thought the citizens should be made aware of what their government does, as much as possible. To cut off press packets, which adds to this public information, was a poor way to save money, he felt. The Chairman suggested we budget money to place the agenda in the newspaper for each meeting so there would r_ be no question about what transpires at the County Commission meetings. Commissioner Scurlock agreed; he felt it was very important that the Board have good communication with the public. Chairman Lyons suggested the Administrator be asked to defer this change in policy, and explore the cost of advertising the agenda for the next meeting. Administrator Nelson thought by at least providing two packets, free copies could be made for the Press of the pages they desired. He felt this was a matter of convenience rather than a matter of suppression. Discussion ensued. Chairman Lyons felt that the Press should get whatever it needs at the r-,utual convenience of both parties. INDIA'N RIVER BOULEVARD Dale Sorensen, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Indian River Memorial Hospital, came before the Board. He stated it was not his intent, or the Hospital's intent, to go over the merits of Indian River Boulevard again but he wanted to present the following resolution: 17 WX 145 a! DEC 2 1991 aox 48 PAGE 241 R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, Indian River County Hospital District is a special taxing district created by act of the Legislature of the State of Florida and WHEREAS, Indian River County Hospital District is charged with the responsibility of operating a hospital within the boundaries of the district and providing health care to the residents of the district and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Indian River County Hospital District has consistently supported the extension of Indian River Boulevard to Barber Avenue as a major highway link between the north and the southeastern areas of the county providing a vital access route to the county's major health care facility and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Indian River County Hospital District believes that it is of critical importance to the hospital as well as the residents of the hospital district that the Indian River Boulevard extension project be carried through the permit stage at the earliest possible time so that a full and fair judgment as to the cost and merits of the project may be made and so that the road, if constructed,, will be completed at the lowest possible cost to the taxpayers of the district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Trustees of the Indian River County Hospital District that it authorizes the provision of $17,000.00 of its operating contingency funds to the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County to be used in the effort to acquire permits from all applicable governmental agencies for the construction of Indian River Boulevard Extension. - M M BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Indian River County Hospital District hereby requests the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County to defer final consideration of the extension of Indian River Boulevard until completion of the permitting stage when all facts and costs will be known and available for consideration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Indian River County Hospital: -District pledges to work closely with the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County in a cooperative effort in the consideration of Indian River Boulevard extension so that a final decision can be made on this issue by the Board of County Commissioners which will truly benefit the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Indian River County Hospital District does not oppose the concept of a referendum relating to Indian River Boulevard extension as long as the question posed in the referendum fairly - presents the issue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be made a part of the minutes of the Board of Trustees meeting of the Indian River County Hospital District. DATED this day of �9�-� , 1981. INDIARRIVE COUNT -'HOSPITAL DISTRICT e BY `j ATTEST: BY: Secretary, Board of Trustees DE02 1V�� , Board of Trustees 809 48 FnE242 DEC 2 190- to 48 fA&E-243 :•fir. Sorensen mentioned that the Hospital Board members dere not opposed to a referendum regarding Indian Fiver Boulevard. He commented that they have been criticized for offering $17,000 to the County for use in acquiring the permits. Mr. Sorensen felt that if the Board did not proceed with obtaining the permits for Indian river Boulevard, they were effectively killing the project for a long period of time. It was his belief that if the permit process would stop, all the time, effort and money expended to get to this stage was wasted. Pyr. Sorensen then spoke of rising con- struction costs. He thought that in order to have a fair referendum on any road project, the Board needs to know how much it was going to cost, therefore, it was necessary to know what the permits will cost. He stressed that the permitting process was a very crucial and important part of a reasonable approach to Indian River Boulevard, and urged the Board to continue on. He felt the dollars would be well spent, as the facts must be presented to the public in order to proceed with a referendum. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the money the Hospital Board was offering the County for this permitting process. Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, for the Board to deny the request for the Hospital to pay $17,000 to the County for the permitting of Indian River Boulevard. Commissioner Wodtke stated that it was well known that he supports the Indian River Boulevard project. He agreed that it was necessary to get the permits in order to determine the cost. Commis- sioner Wodtke felt the road was vital for the traffic flow for the County - a very important part of our transporation system. Commissioner Bird stated that he would vote in favor of not accepting the money from the Hospital, but he agreed completely with Mr. Sorensen's approach - we need to have our facts and figures. He hoped that before the Board would make a determination on any project on our priority list, that the Board should have all of its facts to present to the voters. Commissioner Bird felt the Board should provide the funding for road systems for the County but he certainly appreciated the offer from the Hospital Board, and the sincerity that accompanied their offer. IIe affirmed that he would like to see the County go through the permitting process. Chairman Lyons thanked Mr. Sorensen for his presentation and interest, but he was going to vote for the Motion to deny their offer. He felt the Board was still facing strong opposition and this might cost them more than the $17,000 for the permitting. The Chairman felt that any permits that were obtained today would not last forever. Mr. Sorensen disagreed with the Chairman regarding the length of time for the permits as there was an ability to renew the permits. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried unanimously. Commissioner Wodtke requested that an item be placed on the next agenda for the Board to consider the continuation of permitting for Indian River Boulevard. Discussion followed along those lines. Commissioner Scurlock stated that he planned to vote against the building of Indian River Boulevard. Commissioner Wodtke inquired if the Board felt they had enough information to attach a figure to the project. Commissioner Scurlock felt they did. He then referred to a publication depicting road systems and various other data for a neighboring county, which he thought was informative. Discussion ensued about the engineers' fees. DEC 2 1981 48 PACE 244 21 8 .fx.-245 DEC 2 1981 Ruth Stanbridge, interested citizen, advised the Board that the various agencies that were interested and affiliated with the Indian River Boulevard project have closed out their files. Discussion ensued regarding notification of the various agencies involved in the Indian River Eoulevard project. Administrator Nelson commented that instructions were carried out to stop the permitting process by letter to Reynolds, Smith & Hills. This was put on hold until the offer from the Hospital was received. Commissioner Fletcher objected to having the engineers come back before the Board because they would charge the Board for their time. Commissioner Bird suggested corresponding with them instead. Discussion "followed, and it was determined that the Administrator would contact Reynolds, Smith & Hills requesting they provide a formal written statement and information of requirements to obtain permits for the Indian River Boulevard project. ADVANCE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM The Board reviewed the following list: _ M M M s M INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMS COUNCIL The following list rePtesents possible members and possibie situations. The situations should IN NO WAY be considered as recommendations, but are examples of the type of problems which can be addressed. The actions of this group should only be those which apply to Indian River County. (1) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD EXECUTIVE REPRESENTATIVE This member could represent the Board of Directors and Executive level of this organization. In turn, suggestions brought back to this organization on this level are more readily accepted and more easily implemented. - (2) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD MEMBERSHIP REPRESENTATIVE This member could represent the Personnel in the field. Sometimes the best suggestions come from the people who actually do the work! NOTE: due to tange membexs Aepnesented and d.inectty .involved in patient cane at Indian R.iveA County VoZunteen AmbuZance Squad, penhaps two Aepne�s en-at-ivez here would be appnoptiatie. (3) SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD EXECUTIVE REPRESENTATIVE This member could represent the Board of Directors and Executive level of this organization. In turn, suggestions brought back to the organization on this level are more readily accepted and more easily implemented. (4) SEBASTIAN VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SQUAD MEMBERSHIP REPRESENTATIVE This member could represent the Personnel in the field. (5) INDIAN RIVER SHORES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Since this Agency uniquely combines police, fire and rescue, and has expressed great interest in Paramedic level care, perhaps they should be consulted regarding their representation. One Executive representative and one membership representative does not seem inappropriate for the number of persons involved. (6 ) FLORIDA HIGHWAY PATROL In some areas Paramedics draw blood alcohols for Police Agencies. The Police agencies need a working knowledge of the system and the expected response. DEC 2 '981 23 8 PAPSz4b DEC 2 1991 P� (7) IT:DIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE (includes Sebastian and Felismere Police Department) See #6 These Police agencies sometimes provide access and transportat' to obscure sites (eg: airplane crash). Sometimes lines of responsibility are crossed regarding the patients care and public protection. The Pre -Hospital Care Group is an appropriate place to settle problems and air complaints. (8) VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT See numbers six (6) and seven (7) (9) INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EXECUTIVE REPRESENTATIVE This member could be an Assistant or Administrator. Iti cannot be ztnessed enough that actions brought to a hozp.itat on th.i4 ZeveZ ane qu.ickty and ea.6ity .imptemented. (10) INDIAN RIVER METMORIAL HOSPITAL MEDICAL STAFF REPRESENTATIVE This member could be a member of the Emergency Room Committee or Emergency Room Physician, or an elected representative. By the nature of his expertise this is a powerful member. Again, feedback to the medical staff through one of their own is more readily palatible. (11) SEBASTIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER EXECUTIVE REPRESENTATIVE see number nine (9) (12) SEBASTIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER' MEDICAL STAFF REPRESENTATIVE See number ten (10) (13) AN ATTORNEY This member could be a local attorney interested in Pre -Hospital Emergency Care. County ordinances can be applied to local needs. For example: a) this group could be used by County governmental Agencies to settle disputes between the various involved Agencies (14) SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT The rescue and first response efforts can be coordinated and continue at the present standards. Some areas use Fire Rescue to cut first responder times. The "911" system car, coordinate first response and Paramedic follow up as this Pre -Hospital Care group directs. Perhaps an executive representative and membership representative would be appropriate here. (15) EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND SEBASTIAN RIVER MEDICAL*CENTER It is usual to have the -receiving nersonnal represented. These Nurses and Doctors are often involved in the training of EMTs and Paramedics, and are the indispensible "voice" at the other end of the ACLS unit in most counties. Some areas deal directly with the Physician "on call", using hand sets. Other areas work "out of hospital" cardiac arrests by way of the coronary care units. (16) EMS DIRECTOR This member will perhaps "make or break" our system by his presence, or lack of presence. This is a full time, paid, Executive Director who has no vote on the committee. This Physician will have the title of Medical Director. His responsibilities will include supervision of all EMT's and Paramedics within our County. Chairman Lyons reviewed the list and felt it lacked County Administrator input, and that there were too many categories. Tom Buchanan, Volunteer Ambulance Squad, commented that they wanted to make.sure that everyone was well represented, and hoped they could have this committee formed fairly soon. He added that the Volunteer Ambulance Squad and the Fire Fighters have been working together for many years, and had a good working association. Discussion followed, and it was felt the Committee should' be chaired by a County Commission representative. Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, that a resolution be prepared for the next meeting approving the formation of a committee to determine the need for an Advance Life Support System, that it be chaired by a County Commission representative, and that it be comprised of numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 7; 9, 11, 14 and 16, as outlined in the EMS Council List. Commissioner Bird inquired if it was the Board's feeling that the initial goal of this committee would be to advise us on the proper make-up, and so forth, of how we establish A.L.S. and then once it is established and funded, that they would continue to operate on an advisory capacity. The Board agreed. The Chairman called for the question. and carried unanimously. DEC 2 1991 25 It was voted on BOOK 48 pnw.na8 DEQ 2 198.1 Attorney Collins interjected that it would be helpful to have an interim alternative for a Director included on the Committee. Commissioner Fletcher volunteered his services for this committee. TREASURE COAST VILLAGE SUBDIVISION - TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL The Board discussed the following memorandum from the Administrator.dated November 16, 1981: MI 26 1 TO: The Honorable Board or County Commissioners ®ATE: 1,11ovember 16, 1931 FILE: IFF-,,il-S/D-1+ `234 SUSJEGT: TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL FOR TREASURE COAST.VILLAGE SUBDIVISI( -nom 0s= William B. Messersmith to Neil Nelson David M. Reve-r, Planning & FR011/l: County Administrator EFE�E�,ICES: Zoning Director, dated 11-10-3 (attached) DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: The Indian River County Housing Authority has filed an application to subdivide an 18.77 acre parcel of land into seventy-one (71) lots. The site is located near the northwest corner of North Gifford Road and 40th Avenue and is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential (6 units/acre). Pine flat woods currently cover the site. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: The applicant and engineer -of -record have worked with the County Planning staff in the subdivision design. A. 35 foot right-of-way dedication and an additional 10 foot buffer along the rear property line was requested by the County, and the developer agreed. The Technical Review Committee had no recommendations concerning the subdivision plan at the October 26, 1981, meeting, except that the drainage needed to be reworked and approved by the Public Works Director. The revised drainage system was approved on November 6, 1981. a The lots of the proposed subdivision will range in size from 7,000 square feet, which is the minimum lot size in R-1 zoning districts, to 15,720 square feet. The effective density will be approximately 3.78 units/acre. The proposed subdivision is intended to serve low and moderate income families, as do the existing nearby subdivisions. However, rather than the grid pattern subdivision with uniform lot sizes, the proposed sub- division makes use of cul-de-sacs and varying lot sizes to create a more appealing design. The procedure as outlined in the County's Subdivision Ordinance for tentative plat approval does not require review by the County's legal staff. Generally, planning and engineering items are addressed.at this point in the subdivision -process. The request for final plat approval will include: a certificate of completion from the engineer -of -record; a waiver of liens; and any required performance bonds and deed restrictions, which will be reviewed by the County Attorney. REC01:-E-1ENDATIO i : The proposed subdivision existing land uses which has been complied with, be granted for Treasure • is well designed and is compatible with the are nearby. The County Subdivision Ordinance and the staff recommends tentative lat approval Coast Village Subdivision. ( 51iC- `. 27 DEC 2 1981 8QOX 48 PAIX25f Discussion followed regarding ingress and egress. Senior Planner Challacombe stated that there will be three ways in and out of the property when 43rd Avenue is completed. Engineer Jim Davis advised that there are no immediate plans to develop 43rd at that point; a canal is at that location and there will have to be some drainage modifications made. He commented that they would have to obtain right-of-way on the west side of the road. Mr. Davis stated that the development to the north will connect with Lindsey Road, and the ideal thing would be to get 50' right-of-way to the east on 43rd Avenue. Lengthy discussion followed regarding this matter. Bill Messersmith, engineer, advised that there would be 72' to work with for the extension of 43rd Avenue. Commissioner Scurlock commented that the Board would need a recommendation from the County Engineer as it would be better to address this matter now. It was noted that the Drainage District owns the canal south of North Gifford Road. Motion was made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commis- sioner Bird to grant Tentative Approval for Treasure Coast Village Subdivision with the understanding that the easement on the west property lines be expanded from 10' to 15', and the easements be used for drainage, utilities, and road rights-of-way, and final approval to be based on the 15' easement. Commissioner Fletcher inquired what the price per lot would be in the subdivision -1 Edward Regan, Housing Authority Director, advised that it would be based on actual cost per lot - it would be in the area of $7,000 and there would be no profit. The Chairman called for the°question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. SOUTH BEACH IMPACT FEES The Board reviewed the following memorandum from the County Administrator: TO: Honorable Members of the BATF: November 20, 1981 FILE: Board of County Commissioners SUBJECT: South Beach Impact Fees (a) Memo, Liner to Nelson, Potential Problems/So. Beach, dated 10/26/81 (b) Letter, Roger Wheelwright FROM. Neil Nelson, County Admin. REFERENCES: to Neil Nelson, dated 11/4/81 (c) Letter, Livengood to Nelson dated 11/13/81 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS There is mounting concern of the slow response of impact fees for South Beach coming in. After the initial rush we have only received 4 in the past two weeks (see Ref. a and b). Some of the developers have made promises of subsequent payments so that they can hold the money and receive the interest income from it before turning it loose to the county. The letter (Ref. b) from Mr. Wheelwright exemplifies the problem and concern about making the impact fee payment. Each person interested in getting the water service is informed that if he delays, he runs the risk of being excluded from the 255 connections. Simultaneously, we inform him that if we fall short of accruing the $790,000 escrow, his money will be refunded. The developer (or resident) then has to decide how he wants to handle this paradox. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Ref. (c) suggests establishing a firm date when impact fees are to be paid to the county before the 120 day period expires. It further suggests that the county pay interest to the developers up to the deadline date (i.e. expiration of the 120 day period). This would_ remove the objection the developers have of paying the impact fee early and losing the interest. Review of this matter with the finance director indicates that it will be practical to pay up to 100,10 interest for all parties who pay the impact fee before the 120 day period expires. The alternative is to run the risk (indicated in Ref. b) of allowing developers and customers to apply right up to the 120 day deadline and then trying to salvage the terms of the agreement with Vero Beach. RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING We recommend that all South Beach escrowed money be deposited to an interest bearing account. All parties who pay impact fees will be entitled to receive up to 10; average annual interest, pro -rated for the period of time the county holds the money up to the 120 day°deadline date. QEC 2 198.1 29 BooK 48 mu 252 DEC 2 1991 Bax 48 fAcE253 Administrator Nelson advised that currently they have 58 out of 255 available taps, and have until February 17th to come -up with the.escrow money. He suggested that the Finance Officer could put this money into an interest bearing account as it might cause more people to put up their money. Commissioner Scurlock agreed that this may be the vehicle needed to encourage the people; also the people could be notified of a time prior to the February 17th deadline so that the Board could analyze their options - a little flexibility was needed. Attorney Collins affirmed that he would like to see a 30 day reduction and have the Board move ahead with this matter. Developer Henry Muller came before the Board and commented that he wanted to see water available in January, if possible. He explained that a letter of credit was as good as cash and it could also have an expiration date. The reason for having a letter of credit was that the money could remain in their own interest bearing account until needed by the County. Mr. Muller then discussed interest rates. Lengthy discussion followed, and it was determined to cut the days down from 120 to 90 days for coming up with the escrow funds. Mr. Muller noted there might be a shortfall of cash and the balance might have to be financed. He felt the Board needed to find a mechanism to close the gap for the taps they do not have and might consider interim financing. Mr. Muller requested the Board consider a letter of credit -from Mr. Wheelwright and from his own project, Ocean Ridge. Attorney Collins explained that once the escrowed amount was reached, the County would be in control of the situation, and that he saw no problem with the County entering into an agreement of accepting a letter of credit at this time. Discussion ensued. lot Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, that the Board accept an irrevocable letter of credit, acceptable to the comptroller's regulations, with the understanding that it will be converted to cash at the proper time, grant up to loo average annual interest, and move deadline date to January 15, 1982. Commissioner Fletcher stated that he would not vote for this Motion as he could not see how they were going to take water from the mainland. Discussion followed, and it was determined that the prospective customers should be informed of the Board action, and the status of the program will be reported to the Board at a later date. Hep Walker, St..Christopher Beach, discussed the agreement the County has with the City and pointed out that they do have until February 20th to meet the agreement in case they get in a bind with a shortfall. Administrator Nelson stated that John Little had correspond- ed with him that the City Council has confirmed the October 20th date on the agreement between the City and the County. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. SIXTEENTH STREET STATUS REPORT The Board reviewed the following schematic diagram of Sixteenth Street: 31 800K48PAPE a F -i f4 X N d SIXTEENTH STREET TRAFFIC VOLMM: 7 -Day A.D.T. Schematic Diagram Western Section City of Vero Beach / Indian River County Traffic Engineering Division December 1981 1 :::Imd I ----727t h AV = �C �C 20th AV 14th AV 10th AV US 1 DEC 2 1991 33 -- - -- 4 On FAfF ZUi r 1 DEC 2 1981 48 257 Engineer Jim Davis advised the Board that they have received traffic counters funded by a grant and they have completed the traffic count with the exception of intersection data. He mentioned that there was no stress on the corridor west of 27th Avenue. Mr. Davis requested that no further report to the Board be required until the traffic studies are completed, they will then be able to analyze the whole corridor. Chairman Lyons stated that they would indicate "no report" for the record when it comes up on future agendas. SOUTH COUNTY WELL NO. 3 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 The Board discussed the following information: TO: Honorable Members of Indian DATE: November 19, 1981 FILE: River County Board of Commissioners i1%� FROM :r Neil Construction of South County Well No. 3, Change Order No. 2 Letter Mosby to Nelson, Nelson, County -Admin-" REFERENCES: dated 11/6/81 with encl os by Geraghty and Miller DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Part of the plans and DER requirements is the completion of a third production well for the South County Water Plant. It has always been the intent to complete the third well after the two production wells and one test well prove satisfactory and the water withdrawal permit has been obtained. This procedure had previously been approved by the Board of County Commissioners to assure that the wells would prove satisfactory before investing in the third well. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The attached information from Sverdrup and Parcel has documentation which shows the bid prices from Alsay-Pippin for installing the well and Geraghty and Miller for the hydrogeology work. This bid price is shown less expensive when compared with bids from other well contractors. This competitive comparison was required by FmHA before they would agree to cover the cost of the well construction as a change order. The comparison is as follows: Contractor Bid Alsay Pippin $45,488.00 McCullers & Howard $57,120.00 Layne -Atlantic $53,692.00 Meredith Corp. $63,990.00 RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING It is recommended that Change Order =2 be approved for the well construction by Alsay-Pippin for 545,488.00; that task of logging, testing, and documentation of the ;cell and water samples as well as the report be approved for Geraghty and Miller for $17,200.00 (as esti-ated by them); that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners 'e authorized to execute 5 copies of Change Order No. 2 for FmHt;. It was confirmed through Tommy Tho -as, the engineering consul ant, and the finance office that there is a balance of S82,504.99 olus interest available of the $450,000 original loan to start the South County ;.,later Plant project. This will more than adecuateiy cover the S45,488.00 + $17,200 = $62,688.00 that this well will cost - and have some money remaining. The available funds will therefore cover the cost of this well as was planned. 35 800K 48 PACE -258 DEC 2 1991 aw 48 ru SVERDRUP & PARCEL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND BEINDORF AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (A JOINT VENTURE) Project No. 6674 November 6, 1981 Mr. Neil A. Nelson County Administrator Indian River County 2345 - 14th Avenue Lawyer's Title Building Vero Beach, FL 32960 Subject: Water System Improvements Construction of Well #3 South County Water System Indian River County, Florida Engineer's Project No. 6674 Dear Neil: Enclosed are five original copies of Contract Change Order No. 2 to Alsay- Pippin Corporation's original Contract dated August 14, 1980. This Contract Change Order No. 2 covers the construction of the third production well for the South County Water System. Also enclosed is a copy of a letter from Geraghty & Miller, Inc., justifying the price for the construction of Well #3 as submitted by Alsay-Pippin. Also, please find enclosed a request by Geraghty & Miller, Inc. for a Contract Extension to Perform Additional Services for the construction of the third production well. The above information is submitted for review and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida. Should you require additional information or clarification, please call. Very truly yours, i Randy L. Mosby For the Joint Venture Enclosures cc: Mr. Jim Wheatley Mr. James C. Jones, Jr. File #6674 REPLY TO: REPLY TO: (XX 3885 20TH STREET ( ) 2002 N.W. 13TH STREET POST OFFICE BOX 849 SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 Geraghty & Miller, Inc. CONSULTING GROUND -WATER GECLC3,STS A',,D HYDROLOGISTS 4 November 1981 P225SC2 Indian River County Commissioners Indian River County Courthouse 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Forum III Suite 404 1675 PalmBeach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 J Telephone: 305/ 683-3063 Subject: Request for Contract Extension to Perform Additional Services Dear C=,missioners : We are aware that Indian River County has decided to proceed with the construction of a third production well for the South County Taxing District water system. To assist the County in accomplishing its goal, Geraghty & Miller, Inc., proposes to provide technical services pertaining to the in- stallation of the production well. Geraghty & Miller, Inc., will prepare the necessary drilling contract change orders and assist the County and the Joint Venture with the contract administration, in accordance with Farmers Home Administration requirements. During the con- struction and testing of the well, a Geraghty & Miller, Inc., hydrogeologist will act as resident inspector at the site. In addition to determining that the well is constructed according to specifications, the hydrogeologist will describe and analyze formation samples collected during drilling and perform field analyses on water samples collected as drilling progresses in the Floridan aquifer. Part of the drilling program includes an eight-hour pumping test on the completed well. The data collected during the pumping test will be used to define the aquifer coefficients. Recommendations of design capacity, pump sizing and setting depth will be made from the test data. During the pumping test, the Geraghty & Miller hydrogeologist will coordinate with the Joint Venture and the County the collection and delivery of water samples to a laboratory selected by the Joint Venture. The hydrogeologist will coordinate between Geraghty & Miller, the Joint Venture, and the drilling contractor so that logging and any other special testing procedures are completed on schedule. Indian River County will receive progress reports as the wor:,; progresses. Upon completion of construction, Geraghty & Miller will'analyze the data collected during the drilling and testing of the well and prepare an Addendum to our report of April 1, 1981, "Installation and Testing of Production and Monitoring Wells, South Taxing District, Indian River County, Florida." DEC 2 1991 48 PAGE 2.164 L37 DEO 2 1991i,"261 Project Staffing Geraghty & Miller's work in this program will be directed by a senior staff member of the firm.who will act as project manager. He will be responsible for the overall planning and management of the program. Under his direction, staff hydro - geologists will inspect and gather data during the well drilling, assist the contractor in the performance of pumping tests, and perform other field tasks as required. The project manager will be responsible for the preparation of all reports and correspondence related to the project. Likewise, he will attend all meetings with Indian River County and the Joint Venture and, if required, he also will meet with public agen- cies on the County's behalf. Mr. Vincent P. Amy will act as project advisor to provide overall guidance and to assure that the program is carried out in keeping with the past pro- cedures of"Indian River County and the policies of Geraghty & Miller, Inc. He also will be available to attend meetings and present testimony at public hearings on behalf of the County, if requested. Estimated Costs The total cost of the program has been estimated by allowing for reasonable periods of time in which to perform specific tasks. In this regard, the time to complete the drilling and testing of the well will be greatly dependent upon the perfor- mance of the drilling contractor. The costs have been estim- ated based upon recent experiences of Geraghty & Miller, Inc. The total cost for hydrogeologic consulting services is estimated at $17,200. This cost shall be considered to be the contract extension price for additional services and will not be exceeded without written authorization from Indian River County. Actual Geraghty & Miller, Inc., charges for professional services are based upon hourly rates for work performed plus associated expenses. Monthly invoices will be submitted to Indian River County in accordance with the enclosed fee schedule. We are once again honored to submit this proposal to Indian River County. We will be pleased to present this program to the County Commissioners at a time which would be convenient. Sincerely, GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. James A. Wheatley Senior Hydrogeologist � � i Gera(,hty & Miller, Inc. SCriM= CF FEES FCR PRCFESSIGNPI SEI;VICES Cctcber 1981 The charges for services provided by C-eraghty & Miller, Inc., consist of: (1) an hourly fee for any professional staff member actively working on a project, (2) reimbursement* of expenses, and (3) reimbursement of subcontractor's and other special costs. Bills covering the hourly charges and expenses will be submitted for payment on a monthly basis, unless some other arrangement has been agreed upon. Fee ranges for various classifications of Geraghty & Miller, Inc., personnel are indicated below and are subject to revision. Principal $100.00 Vice President 80.00 - 90.00 Associate 70.00 - 75.00 Senior Scientist 50.00 - 70.00 Senior Hydrogeologist 35.00 - 50.00 Hydrogeologist 25.00 - 35.00 Draftsman, Technician, and Research Assistant 20.00 - 35.D0 ,Reimbursable exrenses are c1hzrgeable at cost plus a 10 -percent handling charge. These include travel costs, living expenses for personnel required to be away from their home office in connection with the work, rental cars, long distance telephone calls, telegrams and cables, copies, prints or reports, shipping costs for samples and other materials, expendable supplies purchased specifically for a project, and premiums for insurance in addition to normal coverage when.required. mileage for the use of personal cars is chzrged at 30 cents per mile. Mileage'for project use of company-oFmed vehicles is charged at 35 cents per mile. mSub-contractor charges, purchase or rental costs for special equipment necessary for the work, and any other costs not associated wits normal office overhead are billed at cost plus a handling charge of 15 percent. DEC 2 199;40 FATE nnn 39 bEC 2 1981 Boa 48 PA,E26, Mr. Randy L. Mosby Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc. 3885 20th Street Suite 4 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 4 November 1981 P225SC2 Subject: Well Program, South County Water System, Indian River County, Florida Dear Randy, I have talked with all bidders of the "Construction of a Florida Aquifer Test Production Well and associated work, Indian River County" listed below is the pricing information that you requested: Layne Atlantic Company Contact: Hal Chittum Increase: Minimum 15%, maxima 20% Meredith Corporation Contact: Joseph Phillips Increase: Minimum 0%, maximum 10% McCullers & Howard Well Drilling, Inc. Contact: Bill McCullers, Sr. ' Increase: Mini= 12%, maximum 15% The attached table shows the four contractors bid prices in July, 1980 and what their prices would be as of November 1981 using their minimum percent increase. If you have any questions please give me a call. Sincerely, GERA= & MILLER, iw. a James A. Wheatley Senior Hydrogeologist INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH COUNTY TAXING DISTRICT Review of Contractors', Bids -for the construction of one Production Well and Associated Work July 7, 1980 and estimated prices for same well November 1981. Bid Price Price Contractor '' July 80 Nov. 81 Alsay-Pippin Corporation $37,980 $45,488* Post Office Box 6650 Lake Worth, Florida 33461 McCullers & Howard $51,000 $57,120 Well Drilling, Inc. 12th Street and Old Dixie Post Office Box V Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Layne -Atlantic $46,688 53,692 1107 Orange Blossom Trail Orlando, Florida 32805 Meredith Corporation $63,990 $63,990 2911 West Washington Street Orlando, Florida 32805 -is price is not an esti but a firm price. 40 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Fc -m FHA 424-7 FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION (Rev: 8-22-69) CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER ORDER'NO. 2 DATE STATE Florida CONTRACT FOR Construction of Floridan Aquifer Test COUNTY Prnrlrtctinn Wpl l and ARAnni_ate13_I]inr11 Indian River OWNER Board of County Commissioners, Tndian River Cn,tntu To - Alsa_y-Pip�in__Cor;pp) gtion,_ ,� p,__ ?c��c_fif .Q. _I�akt~_Inlnrt�I, F1larida__334.fiL (Con ire ctoe) You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from thg contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes DECREASE INCREASE (Supplemental Plans and Specifications Attached) in Contract Price in Contract Price $ Is tree attached sheet TOTALS 1 $ CHANGE JUSTIFICATION: Addition of Production Well No. 3 45,488.00 The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (Increased) By The Sum Of: _ Forty—f iVe Thousand Four Hundred Eighty -Eight and NOZ100 Dollars (S4S,4RA. nn ), The Contract Total Including this and previous Change Orders Will Be: One Hundred Fi fes—Fi vp Thnnsand One Hundrpd Fi crht y—Four- and N0,1300 Dollars (3 155, 184 .00 ), The Contract Period Provided for Completion Will Be (Increased) (Decreased) (Unchanged): Days This document y,,4"become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply bereto. Requested4n:;�n e01/9' /r/ (Owner) (Data) Recommended N''tj o er'a ArcAttect/Engineer) (Date) Accepted -->✓ " `-- (COntreC(el) (Date) Approved By FHA (Name and Title) (Date) suS.GPO:t97b�ZEd�Jti3g0 Position. 6 FHA 424-7 (Rev. 8-22-69) DEC 2 spa 48 PAcF�4 1981 41 July 28, 1981 Mr. Neil Belson c/o John Robbins Board of County Comissioners 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 RE: Indian River County Production Test Well Dear Mr, Nelson: The following are prices on a third production test well for the extension of contract for South County Taxing District Test and Supply wells: 1.0 FLORIDAN AQUIFER OSSERVATIO;l PRODUCTION WELL: For drilling one Floridan Aquifer Observation Production Well to the depth of 700 feet and for furnishing and delivering at the site of work any and all supplies of whatever nature that may be required to perform the work in a satisfactory manner and to carry it to completion; including labor and all manner of facilities; including required drill rigs; including mobilization and demobilization to complete the work; all as specified. Included in lump'sum price is: 400 feet of 12 -inch Schedule 40 PVC casing, 300 feet of 12 -inch open hole, 20 hours of development time, eight (8) hours of pump test, plus geophysical logs, 3 -foot by 3 -foot concrete apron, and all other necessary incidentals. LUMP SUM PRICE OF MOBILIZATION 1.1 For furni Shing. hol a and materials for installing more or less than 400 feet of 12 -inch Schedule 40 PVC casing. $42,538.00 2,950.00 $45,4B8.00 $ 45.00/ft. DEC 2 1981 . �� g �+ /� �/ PIPPIN REPLY TO: P.O. PAX 6650 CORPORATION LAKE FLOAiDA 33451 3346 4y, �~ PH. (305% 267-5620 GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION & DEVELOPMENT TELEX: 803472 _CABLE: APCCZ?RIt: July 28, 1981 Mr. Neil Belson c/o John Robbins Board of County Comissioners 2145 14th Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 RE: Indian River County Production Test Well Dear Mr, Nelson: The following are prices on a third production test well for the extension of contract for South County Taxing District Test and Supply wells: 1.0 FLORIDAN AQUIFER OSSERVATIO;l PRODUCTION WELL: For drilling one Floridan Aquifer Observation Production Well to the depth of 700 feet and for furnishing and delivering at the site of work any and all supplies of whatever nature that may be required to perform the work in a satisfactory manner and to carry it to completion; including labor and all manner of facilities; including required drill rigs; including mobilization and demobilization to complete the work; all as specified. Included in lump'sum price is: 400 feet of 12 -inch Schedule 40 PVC casing, 300 feet of 12 -inch open hole, 20 hours of development time, eight (8) hours of pump test, plus geophysical logs, 3 -foot by 3 -foot concrete apron, and all other necessary incidentals. LUMP SUM PRICE OF MOBILIZATION 1.1 For furni Shing. hol a and materials for installing more or less than 400 feet of 12 -inch Schedule 40 PVC casing. $42,538.00 2,950.00 $45,4B8.00 $ 45.00/ft. Mr. Neil Nelson July 28, 1981 Page Two 1.2 For drilling more'or less than 300 feet of 12 -inch open hole $ 17.00/ft. 1.3 For furnishing, delivering, and placement of more or less than 600 cubic feet of mixed cement. $ 17.00/C.F. 1.4 For well development more or less than 20 hours. $ 56.00/hr. 1.5 For pump testing more or less than eight (8) hours. �_ $ 56.00/hr. 1.6 For standby time when directed by the Consultant. .$157.00/hr. Notes: 1. All vertical measurements shall be taken from +23 feet NGVD. 2. Adjustments 1.1 - 1.6 are to establish unit prices and will be used to adjust Item 1.0, Lump Sum Price, for well with respect to actual quantities used in the field -to install the well. Should we be awarded this project, we request an appropriate time extension to complete the third production well. This quotation is submitted on the request of Tom Tessier of Geraghty & miller, Inc. in West Palm Beach, Florida. RJK:pac cc: Tom Tessier, Geraghty & Miller Very truly yours, ALSAY-PIPPIN CORPORAATION V Russell J. Kerrn Senior Vice President 43 BOOK 8 PAGE 267 Engineer John Robbins commented that this was done as a test well program; they are now requesting that the third well be installed. The contract was closed out back in February of 1981; and now any additional work has to be done in the form of a change order, which is a FmHA requirement. Commissioner Fletcher asked if their firm was doing the laboratory samples. Mr. Robbins advised that Geo -Tech, of West Palm Beach, was doing the samples. Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Bird, that the Board approve Change Order No. 2 for $45,488 to Alsay-Pippin Corporation for a total of $155,184. v The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. Discussion then followed regarding the extension of the existing contract with Geraghty & Miller to perform the hydrogeological work. Commissioner Scurlock raised objections to extending their contract - he felt it was time to be competitive and give others a chance to perform this work. Lengthy discussion followed about the rates and fee schedules; the fee ranges change along with the cost of living. It was felt that all contract extension -requests should be reviewed in the future. Mr. Robbins pointed out that this may create a problem since the change order was approved with the hydrogeologists at Geraghty & Miller doing the job. Motion was made by Commissioner Scgrlock, seconded by Com- missioner Wodtke, that the Board approve the extension of the contract with Geraghty & Miller in an amount not to exceed $17,200. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. The Board of County Commissioners thereupon recessed at 11:50 A.M. for lunch and reconvened at 1:45 o'clock P.M. with the same members present. SOUTH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT The Board immediately recessed in order that a meeting of the South Indian River County Fire District might convene. Minutes of that meeting are being prepared separately. The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 3:33 P.M. with the same members present. REPORT ON PROPOSED BOAT RAMP AT ROUND ISLAND PARK Commissioner Bird reported that the Parks and Recreation Committee reviewed the request for the County to construct a boat ramp on the river side of Round Island Park, and after studying the area and becoming aware of its great potential as a future water -oriented park facility with some bridging and development of the islands, they felt it would be premature to build a boat ramp before long range plans can be developed. Commissioner Bird displayed aerial photos of the Round Island Park area and informed the Board that there is an access road; the County owns a strip going down to the river and also owns "No Name" Island and "Round Island." He noted that the Indian River/St. Lucie -County line bisects the island, but we have leased it from St. Lucie and do have access to the entire island. Especially important is that fact that there is access to the IntraCoastal Waterway through a deep navigable channel, making this one of the few locations in the southern area of the County where fairly large boats can be launched and have access to the inlet. Commissioner Bird continued that there is an area on a narrow peninsula, which is being used for launching presently, but it does not allow for adequate parking. The approximate cost of building a boat ramp facility is estimated in the vicinity of $18,000 and there are funds '.liter al 45uv( 48 ' SOCK 48 PAPE 269 available, but because of the need for long range plans, plus the likelihood of security problems due to the remoteness of the area and lack of development, the committee could not recommend building a boat ramp there at this time. Discussion followed as to the funding available, which is approximately $57,000, and also the possible location of a boat ramp in relation to future bridges to the islands. Commissioner Bird stated that he basically had been in favor of the boat ramp even though the committee felt it was premature, and Chairman Lyons stated that he also had a problem -with this because he believed it will be a long time before Round Island Park can be developed. Mr. Powers, one of the county residents making the request for a boat ramp, asked if the committee is saying they do not want to build a ramp on the island at this time, and Commissioner Bird stated that they did not even consider one on the island and felt it was premature to build a ramp anywhere in that area pending additional planning and more development in the surrounding area. Mr. Powers pointed out that there is a road; they do launch in this area now; and there are generally 2 or 3 cars there all the time that have boats in the water. Discussion followed as to doing something on a temporary basis to help, and Mr. Powers felt about an hour's work with a backhoe and adding some gravel to flatten out the area would be a great help since the area is only -r large enough to launch one boat at a time now. Commissioner Bird asked the Administrator if he could meet with Mr. Powers on site to see what could be done, and the Administrator believed the County crew could do something if it is not too extensive. The Board agreed to make this an administrative matter. 46 Commissioner Bird noted that Commissioner Scurlock had raised a question about Wabasso Island and he asked if the Board wished the Committee to look into this. Commissioner Scurlock reported that it had been brought to his attention by a resident of Orchid Island that there is a possibility of losing this island, and he believed it would be appropriate to have the Recreation Committee research this possibility. The Board agreed. Commissioner Fletcher wished to know if the County can do anything about changing the tegulations applying to boat licensing since now it seems that any boat, even those under 10' long, are required to have a license. Attorney Brandenburg informed him that legislation would have to be introduced at the State level to change this. APPLICATION FOR STATE AID TO LIBRARIES It was explained that Librarian Betty Rodgers brought the application to the Board's attention and requested that it be signed as soon as possible. She had hoped to get it approved before December 2nd, but it was explained that this requires Board action. On.Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, Commissioner Fletcher voted in opposition, the Board by a 4 to 1 vote, approved the grant application for State Aid to Libraries and authorized the signature of the Chairman. DEC 2 1981 47 4' r OEC 2 im FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES APPLICATION FOR STATE AID TO LIBRARIES The Board of County Commissioners of INDIAN RIVER wX U F, .r,- County hereby applies to the Division of Library Services of the Florida Department of State for an operating grant for public library service as authorized under Chapter 257, Florida Statutes, for the fiscal year begin- ning October 1, 1931, and ending September 30, 1982. We certify that the following amounts were expended for the operation of public library service during the fiscal year ending September 30, 1980. Total Expenditures. October 1, 1979 - September 30, 1980 Less, State Aid (RECEIVED) ......................... Less, LSCA Program Grants (RECEIVED) ............... $ _ Less, Any Funds Not Expended Centrally ............. $ Total Local Expenditures Qualified for Matching .... We certify that the following amounts, exclusive of federal and state grants, will be available and expended for public library use during fiscal year 1981-1982. County Appropriations (County funds from local sources only) .........-1:14�488a81--- *City Appropriations ( City funds from 'local sources only) ..................................... $ Other 48.585.0C} 3 Fggp.,.i atex.exstt, S .................. *Affidavit from each city providing funds optional. TOTAL $A -5B,, -5a-9-.00 This library service is provided through contracts with the following cities and counties: The yield of a one mill tax in this county is L /A 82 -Al The applicant agrees to expend any grant(s) awarded pursuant to this Application in full compliance with the terms and conditions of Chapter 257, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 1B-2, Florida Administrative Code, relating to county free public libraries and the State Library, which 'Chapters are incorporated by reference as part of this Clerk of the Circuit Court L/ December 2, 1981 Date ication and attached hereto. n, Indian Rilv\-64 County oard of County Commissioners AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY Attorney Gary Brandenburg asked the Board's permission to advertise for an assistant County Attorney in the Florida Bar Journal. He noted that there is quite a time lag, and he would like to have an assistant on board as soon as possible. On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized advertising in the Florida Bar Journal for an assistant County Attorney. DOCUMENTS TO BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES Agreement between the County and the Town of Indian River Shores re park property to be annexed into the Town is hereby made a part of the Minutes as approved,at the meeting of November 18, 1981. 49 DEC 2 im AGREEMENT Between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY and TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES THIS AGREEMENT, entered into the—j day of , 1981, by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County", and TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, a municipal corporation created under the laws of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "Town", heirs, successors and assigns: WHEREAS, County and Town have been.involved in litigation over the control and development of the park, which litigation is referred to as Case No. 80-134; and WHEREAS, the litigation, through appeals, determined that certain areas, including the parklands described in Exhibit "A" to this Agreement, were improperly annexed by the Town and the annexing procedures were declared null and void; and WHEREAS, the Town now desires to annex certain lands as shown outlined in red on Exhibit "B" to this Agreement; and : WHEREAS, the County lands which are to be used as a park are part of Exhibit "B" shaded in blue to reflect that part of Parcel 1 lying West of Section 20.of Exhibit "A" and Parcel III and shaded in green to reflect that part of ParcelI lying East of Section 19, Parcel II and Parcel IV all of Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of both County and Town to enter into this Agreement to avoid additional litigation and to ac- commodate the Town regarding proposed new annexation as reflected in red on Exhibit "B"; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and other valuable considerations, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Chapter 163, Part 1, Florida Statutes (1980) known as the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1969. This Agreement during its term may not be terminated or modified without the mutual consent of both parties. 2. The term of this Agreement'shall be for a period of fifty (50) years from the date of execution or so long as County owns the lands shaded in green on Exhibit "B" whichever period is longer. It is the intent of all parties that the land referred to in Exhibit "A" shall be used during the term of thie Agreement for park purposes benefiting all of the residents of Indian River County. 3. Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated into this Agree- ment embodies the parklands owned by Indian River County. The parties agree that that part of Parcel I lying West of Section 20 and Parcel III may be annexed into the Town along with other properties outlined in red as shown on Exhibit "B". Town agrees that during the term of this Agreement it will not pursue annexation of that part of Parcel I lying East of Section 19, Parcel II and Parcel IV without the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. All parcels as set out in Exhibit "A" shall be used for park purposes. The parties agree that the property described in Exhibit "A" shall be developed. in general accord with the conceptual plans for park development as shown on Exhibits "C" attached and made a part of this Agreement. Parcel III shall be developed as the entrance to the park from A -1-A to Parcel II. The Town agrees to issue appropriate permits and cooperate in the development of the park. The parties recognize that Exhibit "C" is a conceptual plan for the park development. County shall have the right to make modifications to the plan when" developing the parklands. Modifications to increase parking,restroom and shower facilities, shelters, picnic tables and cooking or barbeque grills beyond that proposed in Exhibit "C" shall be submitted to the liasion committee, created pursuant to paragraph 5, prior to im- plementation. 4. Town and County agree that, as to the parklands described in Exhibit "A", each body will cooperate with the other in allowing the lands within their jurisdiction to be used for park purposes and providing for the following -rules and regulations governing the park's use: A. No alcoholic beverages possessed or consumed on site. B. All unleashed animals prohibited. C. All private business and advertising signs prohibited. D. Wear proper attire and prohibit topless and nude bathing. WOK ifnu 274 -2- DEC 2 1981 Box 48 FnE 275 E. Prohibit overnight camping. F. Allow fires only in designated areas. G. Prohibit fireworks. H. Prohibit gambling. I. Prohibit loitering. J. Prohibit motor vehicles on the beach. K. Prohibit excessive noise such as loud playing of instruments, record players, etc. L. Prohibit solicitation. M. Provide for designated surfing areas as determined by County. N. Prohibit crossing over the dunes except in designated cross -overs. 0. Prohibit distrubing the vegetation on the dunes. P. Provide for lifeguards on an as -need basis determined by County at County expense. Q. Provide for hours open to the public (with due consideration to standard and daylight savings times and the need of fishermen). The maximum hours shall be sunrise to 9:00 P.M. Town and County shall not restrict the lands described•in Exhibit "A" from being used for park purposes except as above set forth, and Town shall not impose fees or charges for use of the parklands by the public except by mutual agreement. 5. Town and County agree to establish a liaison committee made up of three (3) appointees from the County and two (2) appointees from the Town who shall meet and make recommendations periodically to their appointing Boards as to methods of improving the utilization and operation of the park. 6. Parties agree as part of the overall plan in developing the property that the County will retain the foilage on a thirty-five foot (35') strip both at the North and South property lines of Parcel I, Exhibit "A". Additionally, County will construct a fence along the North and South property lines of Parcel I. Both the natural buffer and the fence will be provided to insulate Parcel I from the adjoining residential areas. -3- Additionally, on the West line of Parcel II, which constitutes the East property line of Pebble Beach Villas Condominium, County will plant a twenty -foot (201 0 ) vegetation strip separating Pebble Beach Villas from the park. 7. Town recognizes that County has applied for certain State and Federal park development funds. When requested by County, Town is to join in as required on the application and to otherwise fully endorse the development of Exhibit "A" land as a park. 8. This Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of both Town and County pursuant to recommendations of the liaison committee to accomplish mutual goals such as law enforcement and such other matters to which both governmental bodies will agree. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officials of the County and the Town have executed this Agreement, in duplicate, any copy of which two may be deemed an original, the date and year first above written. INDIAN �RnIVER COUNTY, FLOR DA Bys/` C William C. Wodtke, Jr. Vice -Chairman Board of County Commissioners (SEAL) Attest: Freda Wright, Cle of the Circuit Court QUAY'QO y� AM ed a sto tjp�' OPE=-f-111 e_ __!�/ orge llzns, Jr County Attorney TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER S OREA, By ayor (SEAL) Attesft �._..•%% of --- Town Clerk Appro as to fo �ftster E. Clem, Town Attorney -4- EC 2 1981 a48 PACF27 F7_1_1. DEC 2 1991 Lx I I :t. i; I'i' BaOK 8 PAOF 271 The South one-half of Governl`:ent Lot 9 le:.:, th(2 feet thereof, and GovernmeliL I.ot 1U 1c.:;:> Elle Swlt:ll 107'(). u3 feet thereof all in Sccti.on 19, T(}::11: hin 32 SOut:11; 40 East and 1yin;; I:a-)t of SL.ite I:o;ia X11.1".: ;11so t:ho ;:ortil 320 feet of the South 13;10.63 feet o1 Lot 1, 1 -jest of the East 10.69 acres of :::zi6 Govc2r11111cnt I,()t, 1, Section 20' To,•msliip 32 SollL;i, 1Zan,;e 1(0 1:I!: t:, Ill�iA- Ri.vcr County, Florida, being more particularly duscri.bcd as follows Beginning at the South,•:es nrly corner of rehble Beach Development No. 2 accr_)rding to a p1,aL fi.lecl in 1'.l,lt 1',001, i , Page 83 A, Public Records of said In(li-an River County rlllci running, thence `d 89° 53' 24" E, 4)1.83 feet alc)n; the South boundary of said 1}e1lble Beacn De'Jelo^,1:1('.nt I:o. 2; 'T,,,ence, rll:l S 0° 06' 36" E, 20.00 feet along said Sc -,i n bounfld?- Zi1� cc , run. 1.1. 89° 53' 24" E, 344. 28ieet to the SOI tl-113 St cOr:Ier Gi Pebble Beach Development tlo . 2; Tlleiicc, SOUL11 0 , 320 feet along the taest boun: by the UiliteCl :�L�rtU� o� t1::erL;a .it 1�_' C Thence II 00° 13' 15" 1: StatCs tr:lct and .:�1Et` CtIUCnt:t :1:"OU'T Li:'. i)(�'••• ••ii o." l �i land coIlve"ed to 1ri1dia"1 States of t1.1er1Ca bi t (lUlC1.11... �(' .'-l: (<il Lt'tl t�L:f;Li' t . ;) / o , a distance of ].350.0 feet to a c;orilcr of sai.d r:t-L:� :II11 e:he POINT OF I3EGININING. Thence con'"- Id 00° 13' l 1" alon.", a1.Ct United States tract 340 feeL. ,..or(, Cr lc:;: t:o a ;)oi_rt :ilic:l _s on the mean hi;;h vjaLer line of :-c Atlantic Ocean, and: aL a corner of said United States tract; Thence Sol.:theastcr ly alcn7 the 11L1n_lt.:. � C)�. G•..yC. i hi;;h :watcr line ,•:hick is along tale boundary of midi United SCates tract 35'3 feet, more or less, to a point oil a bc::r:3 S 891 45 -25 E from the point of begfinnin._, at a �cornc r 01. sa'_d United States tract and at a corner of said. Ind=ian i:i d" r Cj, 11 LracL" ; Thence N 89° 45' �5" ?'? a1on,; the bo�...'.3r 0y S iJ _-ed States tract T:Thlch is along thc boundary o� `:..l,l II1� '_a:: ..i';er County tract 90 feet, more or le:;s, to tl:e L)oinf" ol" beb-J-nn=n:7 Containin; 0,33 of an acre, more or less, an:: bC-inS a portion of Tract "A" of Vero -Beach Trac::i_n� PARrFT. TV That certain tract or parcel of land 10cat �(-': itl Goverll:,e� Lot 1, Section 20, Township 32 South, Rancze 40 East in Indian River County, Florida, and more particularly descriLcd as follows, to -wit: As a point of reference, coni,:lenee at the south::-`st corner of said Section 20; run thence S 89° 45' 25" E a1onc- t::e south line of said Section 20, a distance of 3=119.14 fe-2t to a concre-o monument; thence H 0° 13' 15" E, 1000 feet to file Point of beginning of the property hereb}' conveyed?; Lrom said oint o� beginning, continue N 0° 13' i5" E, 350 zc:et to a point; thencfe S 89° 45' 25" E, 90 feet., more or less, to the roan hJ-,,;h ::Gtc_ line of the Atlantic Ocean; t;lence m.cande:- in a scut:leas':er1'-7 direction 375 feet, more or less, to a iir.e th.zt ._s p�:,-..11eI and 1000 feet north of the scut', line of said, ,Sect:ic;n 20; t:)0-1 Ce N 890 45' 25" L'' 203f c. e t, I"..,r c. or less 11-:0 a lir_ fi=at is the :ie::t line oL Vsa- d Sec,:4 -n 20 parallel and 349.14 feet eases of and the point of beginning, containing; 1.21 acre--, I;io-,e or less. ` DEC 2� ^ D C 2" '1981 EXHIBIT It PROPOSED ANNEX - AREA N PEBBLE BEACH Z),E- V. A/ Q. 2 R/ VER SHORES P. B. 7- 83, 83A BOUNDARY N D I A�N —A Tlarcel I VER Paicel U,, D7 IV -C 0 U N.TY z, -p 5.)9 AC. BEA CH V1 L LA S P. B. B-93 SA Y ES TA TES (REPLAT) J-1 Parcel -II v -Z. �� fd .sA 6.10 Ac. 1. G I AC. '4. I ECKERD G Ac. DRUG -C OR P. • P C?x 0 100 200 7-11 C A L E in FEET COR P. P. 0. 8-17,.17A 0.53 Ac. 0- 29 5 m t Modification Number Six to Agreement for Engineering Services with the Joint Venture (Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc. and Beindorf and Associates, Inc.) is hereby made a part of the Minutes as approved at the meeting of November 4, 1981. 0 S DEC 2 im 57 DEC 2 i98� MODIFICATION NUMBER SIX (6) TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES DATED DECEMBER 20, 1972 BOOK 48. PAGFZ8 . THIS MODIFICATION NUMBER 6, made this �N day of 00yt[Y1l3ep , 19 -EL, L, by and between Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, here- after referred to as the OWNER, and Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc. and Beindorf and Associates, Inc. (A Joint Venture), hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER, modifies the Contract between the parties dated December 20, 1972, as amended by Modifications numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. The OWNER intends to construct Water System Improvements to include new water distribution system; new ground storage tank(s); new pumping station(s); subaqueous waterline crossing of the Indian River; connection of distribution system to the South County Water System. Construction is to occur in two phases in Indian River County, State of Florida, and the ENGINEER agrees to perform the various professional engineering services required for the design and construc- tion of said system.. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, it is hereby agreed: SECTION A - ENGINEERING SERVICES The ENGINEER shall furnish basic engineering services as follows: _ 1. The ENGINEER has provided a preliminary engineering report to the OWNER under a separate authorization and at no cost to this Modification Number 6. 2. After the preliminary engineering report has been reviewed and the OWNER directs the ENGINEER to proceed, the ENGINEER will perform the necessary design surveys, accomplish the detailed design of the project, prepare detailed drawings, specifications and contract documents, and make a final cost estimate based on the final design for the entire system. Upon written authorization from the OWNER, the ENGINEER will complete final plans, speci- fications and contract documents and submit for approval all permits to local, State and Federal regulatory agencies. It is also understood that if subsur- face explorations such as borings, soil tests and the like are required to determine amounts of rock excavation or foundation conditions, the ENGINEER will furnish supervision of said explorations without additional charge, but the costs incident to such explorations, no matter whether they are performed by the ENGINEER or,.by others, shall be paid for by the OWNER as a direct cost to the ENGINEER. 3. The ENGINEER will attend conferences with the OWNER and his representatives and other.interested parties. 4. The contract documents furnished by the ENGINEER under Section A-2 above shall. utilize standard construction contract documents, including Supple- mental General Conditions, Contract Change Orders and partial payment estimates. 5. Prior to the advertisement for bids, the ENGINEER, for each construction contract, will provide not to exceed 10 copies of detailed drawings, speci- fications, and contract documents for use of the OWNER, and the appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies from whom approval of the project must be.obtained. The cost of such drawings, specifications, and contract docu- ments shall be included in the basic compensation paid to the ENGINEER. 6. The ENGINEER will furnish additional copies of the drawings, specifications and contract documents as required by prospective bidders, material suppli- ers, and other interested parties, but may charge for the actual cost of such copies. Upon award of each contract, the ENGINEER will furnish to the OWNER five sets of the drawings, specifications and contract documents for execution. The cost of these sets shall be included in the basic com- pensation paid to the ENGINEER. Original documents, survey notes, tracings, and the like, except those furnished to the ENGINEER by the OWNER, are and ✓ shall remain the property of the OWNER. 7. The drawings prepared by the ENGINEER under the provisions of Section A-2 above shall be in sufficient detail to permit the actual location of the . proposed improvements on the ground. The ENGINEER shall prepare and furnish to the OWNER without any additional compensation, three copies of a map showing the needed construction easements and permanent easements and the land to be acquired. Property surveys, property plats, legal descriptions, and negotiations for land rights shall be accomplished by the OWNER, unless the OWNER requests the ENGINEER to perform these services. In the event Page Two DEC 2 1981 BOOK 48 PAc,E � J r bEC 2 1981 Aw 48 283 the ENGINEER is requested to perform such services and make detailed surveys, the ENGINEER shall be additionally compensated as set out in Section C hereof. 8. The ENGINEER will attend the bid opening and tabulate the bid proposals, make an analysis of the bids, and make recommendations -for awarding contracts for construction. 9. The ENGINEER will check and approve any necessary shop and working drawings furnished by contractors. 10. The. ENGINEER will interpret the intent of the drawings and specifications to protect the OWNER against defects and deficiencies in construction on the part of the contractors. The ENGINEER will not, however, guarantee the performance by any contractor. 11. The ENGINEER will provide horizontal and vertical control in the form of bench mark circuit and two base lines for vertical control to be used by the contractor in staking the construction. 12. The ENGINEER will provide general engineering inspection of the work of the contractors as construction progresses. Unless notified by the OWNER in writing that the OWNER will provide for such inspection, the ENGINEER will provide detailed resident construction inspection (RESIDENT INSPECTOR). The ENGINEER does not guarantee the performance of the contractor(s) by the ENGINEER'S performance of such detailed construction inspection. The ENGINEER'S undertaking hereunder shall not relieve the contractor of his obligation to perform the work in conformity with the drawings and specifications and in a workmanlike manner; shall not make the ENGINEER an insurer of the contractor's performance; and shall not impose upon the ENGINEER any obligation to see that the work is performed in a safe manner. 13. The ENGINEER will cooperate and work closely with the OWNER and his repre- sentative. 14. The ENGINEER will review and approve estimates for progress and final payments. 15. The ENGINEER will make final inspection of all construction and a written certification of final inspection to the OWNER and applicable regulatory agencies. 16. The ENGINEER will provide the OWNER with one set of reproducible record drawings, and two sets of prints at no additional cost to the OWNER. Such drawings will be based upon information provided by the RESIDENT INSPECTOR Page Three and contractor. 17. The ENGINEER will prepare notices and advertisement of final payments if required by state statutes. 18. The ENGINEER will be available to furnish engineering service and consul- tations necessary to correct all unforeseen project operating difficulties for a period of 1 year after the date of final inspection and acceptance of the facility by the OWNER. This service -will include instruction of the OWNER in initial project operation and maintenance but will not include supervision of normal operation of the system. Such consultation and advice shall be furnished as an additional service and compensation shall be paid to the ENGINEER in accordance with Section C of this Modification Number 6. 19. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER'S expense, such insurance as will protect him and the OWNER from claims under the Workman's Compensation Act and from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the negligent performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER'S employees of the ENGINEER'S functions and services required under this Modification Number 6. 20. The ENGINEER further agrees to prepare and submit all applicable permits as part of his basic compensation. Any additional work required by regulatory agencies shall be as an additional service and the OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER in accordance with Section C, Additional Services, of this Modification Number 6. 21. The OWNER intends to construct the South Beach Water System Improvements in two phases. The ENGINEER will, therefore, prepare detailed construction drawings, contract documents and provide resident inspection services for each phase of construction. However, the design of both phases shall consti- tute a master plan design of the South Beach Water System Improvements. Compensation to the ENGINEER for basic services for each phase of the design and inspection shall be in accordance with Section B of this Modification Number 6. The general scope of work for each phase is listed below and includes but is not limited to the following: Phase I: Design and Construction Surveillance of: A. 750,000 gallon ground storage tank. Page Four DEC 2 1981 a�o� 8 PnF 284 bEC 2 1991 Phase II: Design and Construction Surveillance of: WX AS FAU265 B. Booster Pumping station at ground storage tank location. C. In-line booster pumping station with bi-directional flow capa- bility. D. 14" waterline from elevated tank to Compass Cove Drive. E. 2 1/2" waterline from Spyglass Lane to Sea Turtle. F. Connection of new improvements to existing South Beach system. A. 20" subaqueous waterline cross- ing of the Indian River. B. Connection of subaqueous cross- ing to South County Water System. C. 10" waterline from river crossing to elevated tank. D. 14" waterline from Compass Cove Drive to Spyglass Lane. E. 12" waterline from Spyglass Lane to 1,400 feet north of County line. F. 10" waterline from 1,200 feet north of County line to County line. SECTION B - COMPENSATION FOR BASIC ENGINEERING'SERVICES The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for Basic Engineering Services for each Phase of the work covered by this Modification Number 6 in accordance with the Payment Schedule listed below. Payment Schedule 1. Phase I Improvements: Payment to the ENGINEER shall be.the total payroll cost of salaries and wages for personnel assigned to the Project, times a factor of 2.1 to provide for general overhead and profit, plus the actual cost of reimbursable expenses as defined hereinafter. Such compensation to the ENGINEER shall not exceed $67,000.00 without OWNER'S written authorization. Page Five M M 2. Phase II Improvements: Payment to the ENGINEER shall be the total payroll cost of salaries and wages for personnel assigned to the Project,. times a factor of 2,1 to provide for general overhead and profit, plus the actual cost of reimbursable expenses as defined hereinafter.' Such compensation to the ENGINEER shall not exceed $300,000.00 without OWNER'S written authorization. The payroll cost of salaries and wages used as a basis for payment shall mean the cost of salaries and wages paid to principals and employees engaged directly on the Project, including, but not limited to, engineers, architects, surveymen, designers, draftsmen, specification writers, estimators, stenographers and clerks, plus cost of fringe benefits including, but not limited to, social security contributions, unemployment, excise and payroll taxes, workmen's compensation, health and retirement benefits, pensions, sick leave, vacation, and holiday pay applicable thereto. Reimbursable expenses shall mean the actual expense of transportation and subsistence of principals and employees when traveling in connection with the Project, field office expenses, resident Project, representative's subsistence and transportation, toll telephone calls and telegrams, reproduction of reports, drawings and specifications, and similar Project related items. SECTION C - ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES In addition to the foregoing being performed, the following services may be provided UPON WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER: 1. Site Surveys for pumping stations, water storage tanks. 2. Laboratory tests, well tests, borings, specialized geological, hydraulic or other studies recommended by the ENGINEER. 3. Property surveys, detailed descriptions of sites, maps, drawings, or estimates related thereto; assistance in negotiating for land and easement rights. 4. Necessary data and filing maps for water rights, water adjudica- tion, and litigation. 5. Redesigns ordered by the OWNER after final plans have been accepted by the OWNER. 6. Appearances before courts or boards on matters of litigation related to the project. Page Six 8QK 48 I'A"E. DEO 2 1991 48 PA.6.E ' 7. Permitting requirements of various regulatory agencies beyond that covered by Section A - Basic Engineering Services. Payment for the services specified in this Section C shall be in accordance with Contract Modification Number Five of the December 20, 1972 Agreement for Engineer- ing Services. The ENGINEER will render to OWNER for such services an itemized bill, separate from any other billing, at the end of each month for compensation for services performed hereunder during such month, the same to be due and payable by OWNER to the ENGINEER on or before the 10th day of the following month. SECTION D Except as noted or modified herein, this Contract Modification Number 6, in no way alters or effects that certain Agreement for Engineering Services dated December 20, 1972, as amended by Modifications Number 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 by and between the OWNER and ENGINEER. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Modification Number 6 in dupli- cate on the respective dates indicated beloww (SEAL) OWN;fit: 2 ATTEST�/��ai�! Type Name_ Freda Wright Title Clerk of Circuit Court (SEAL) Type Name John A. Robbins Title Project Manager i)ipe Name Patril k V. Lyons Chairman, In ian River County Title Board of County Commissioners Date o'er/ (A JOINT VENTURE) ENGINEER: By ame Jame ones, Vice President Title_ Sverdrup & Parcel and Associates, Inc. Date October 28, 1981 By Type ame James L. Beindorf President Title Beindorf and Associates, Inc. Date November 4, 1981 Page Seven Resolution No. 81-101 - amending.General Development Utilities, Inc. franchise and adopting its Service Availability/Main Extension Policy is hereby made a part of the Minutes as approved at the meeting of November 4, 1981. 2 E00K 8 FBnF.2:.98 E� 2 191 65 ®K48 PACE D E C 2 1991 RESOLUTION NO. 81-101 WHEREAS, on the L( day of 1981 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. pursuant to a properly filed and noticed application for amendment to its franchise and adoption of its Service Availability / Main Extension Policy, appeared at a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "Board", received and �eviewed documentary exhibits as filed on behalf of General Development Utilities, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner", and had opportunity to question Petitioner and, in addition, allowed for comment from citizens of Indian River County residing within the franchise area; and WHEREAS, only new customers of the system will be affected by the changes to the Service Availability / Main Extension policy; and WHEREAS, the Board considered the effect of the changes on future customers; and WHEREAS, the Board finds it in the public interest to amend the franchise to include revised charges for extension fees and to adopt the policy regarding Service Availability / Main Extension as Exhibit A hereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Resolution dated April 5, 1960 between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA and GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC., as subsequently amended by Resolution No. 77-95 and Resolution 80-15 is hereby amended as to Section 14 of the original Resolution as amended, to read as follows: SECTION 14 The rates charged by the Company for its service hereunder shall be fair and reasonable and designed to meet all necessary costs of the service, including a fair rate of return on the net valuation of its properties devoted thereto under efficient and economical management. The Company agrees that it shall be subject to all authority now or hereafter possessed by the County or any other regulatory body having competent jurisdiction .to fix just, reasonable and compensatory rates. When this franchise takes effect, the Company shall have authority to charge and collect not to exceed the following schedule of rates, which shall remain effective until changed or modified as herein provided, to -wit: WATER RESIDENTIAL SERVICE RATE SCHEDULE Availability - Available throughout the area served by the Company. Applicability - For water service for all purposes in private residences and individually -metered apartment units. Limitation - Subject to all of the Rules and Regulations of this Tariff. Monthly Rates ._ First 3,000 Gallons $5.00 minimum per month Over 3,000 Gallons $1.00 per 1,000 Gallons Minimum Charge - $5.00 per month.- Terms onth:Terms of Payment - Bills are due and payable when rendered and become delinquent if not paid within twenty (20) days, and many, after five (5) days written notice, be discontinued. Billing - Bills shall be rendered monthly and the meter reading dates shall coincide as near as practically possible, and bills rendered as soon as possible thereafter. Bills rendered for less than fifty (50) per cent (50%) of the normal billing period will be billed in accordance with Rule 25-10.97(2), Florida Administrative Code: "Whenever, for any reason, the period of service for which a bill is rendered is less than fifty percent (50%) of the normal billing period, the charges applicable to such service, including minimum charges, shall be prorated in the proportion that the actual number of service days bears to a thirty (30) day month; except that: (a) Opening bills need not be rendered but may be carried over to and included in the next regular monthly billing. (b) For service taken under flat rate schedules, fifty percent (50%) of the normal charges may be applied. (c) The practices employed by the utility in this regard shall have uniform application to all customers." Reconnection charges - On the initial turn -on of a new service or account, there will be no charge. On reconnections there will be a reconnection - 2 - LEG.70/03 EnoK 8 PAU 290 FP,_ I DEC 9 1991 BOOK 48 PACE 291 charge of $9.50 for each request during regular working hours. After regular working hours, the charge will be $13.00. GENERAL SERVICE RATE SCHEDULE Availability - Available throughout the area served by the Company. Applicability - For water service to General Service Customers. Limitation - Subject to all of the Rules and Regulations of this Tariff. Monthly Rates First 3,000 Gallons $5.00 Minimum per month Over 3,000 Gallons $1.00 per 1,000 Gallons Minimum Charge - $5.00 per month. Terms of Payment - Bills are due and payable when rendered and become delinquent if -not paid within twenty (20) days, and may, after five (5) days written notice, be discontinued. Billing - Bills shall be rendered monthly and the meter reading dates shall coincide as near as practically possible, and bills rendered as soon as possible thereafter. Bills rendered for less than fifty percent (50%) of the normal biling period will be billed in accordance with Rule 25-10.97(2), Florida Administrative Code: "Whenever, for any reason, the period of service for which a bill is rendered is less than fifty percent (50%) of the normal billing period, the charges applicable to such service, including minimum charges, shall be prorated in the proportion that the actual number of service days bears to a thirty (30) day month; except that: (a) Opening bills need not be rendered but may be carried over to and included in the next regular monthly billing. (b) For service taken under flat rate schedules, fifty percent (50%) of the normal charge may be applied. (c) The practice employed by the utility in this regard shall have uniform application to all customers." Reconnection Charges - On the initial turn -on of a new service or account, there will be no charge. On reconnections there will be a reconnection charge of $9.50 for each request during regular working hours. After regular hours, the charge will be $13.00. - 3 LEG. 70/03 SEWER RESIDENTIAL SERVICE RATE SCHEDULE Availability - Available throughout the area served by the Company. �pplicability - For sewer service for all purposes in private residences and individually -metered apartment units. Limitations - Subject to all of the Rules and Regulations of this Tariff. Monthly Rates Minimum Charge - $6.00 Flat rate per month. Terms of Payment - Bills are due and payable when rendered and become delinquent if not paid within twenty (20) ,days, and service may, after five (5) days written notice be discontinued. Billing - The billing month dates shall coincide with the billing month for sewer service. Bills rendered - for less than fifty percent (50%) of the normal billing period will be billed in accordance with Rule 25-10.111(2), Florida Administrative Code: "Whenever, for any reason, the period of service for which a bill is rendered is less than fifty percent (50%) of the normal billing period, the charges applicable to such service, including minimum charges, shall be prorated in the proportion that the actual number of service days bears to a thirty (30) day month; except that: (a) Opening bills need not be rendered but may be carried over to and included in the next regular monthly billing. (b) For service taken under flat rate schedules, fifty percent (50%) of the normal charges may be applied. (c) The practices employed by the utility in this regard shall have uniform application to all customers." Reconnection Charges - Sewer service discontinued at Customer's request for non-payment of bills, will be resumed only upon payment of all past -due bills and penalties, together with the total cost of the Company of discontinuing and reconnecting sewer service lines. GENERAL SERVICE RATE SCHEDULE Availability - Available throughout the area served by the Company. Applicability - For sewer service to General Service Customers. Limitation - Subject to all of the Rules and Regulations of this Tariff. - 4 - LEG.70/03 DEC 2 1981 500K 8 PAGE if 92 r � DEC 2 1981 . 48 PnE,293. Monthly Rates $6.00 flat rate per month or 75% of the water bill whichever is greater. Minimum Charge - $6.00 Flat rate per month. Terms of Payment - The billing month dates shall coincide with the billing month for sewer service. Bills rendered for less than fifty percent (50%) of the normal billing period will be billed in accordance with Rule 25-10.111(2), Florida Administrative Code: "Whenever. for anv reason. the period of service for which a bill is rendered is less than fifty percent (50%) of the normal billing period, the charges applicable to such service, including minimum charges, shall be prorated in the proportion that the actual number -of service days bears to a thirty (30) day month; except that: (a) Opening bills need not be rendered but may be carried over to and included in the next regular monthly billing. (b) For service taken under flat rate schedules, fifty percent (50%) of the normal charge may be applied. (c) The practice employed by the utility in this regard shall have uniform application to all customers. Reconnection Charges _ Sewer service discontinued at Consumer's request or for non-payment of bills, will be resumed only upon payment of all past -due bills and penalties, together with the total cost to the Company of discontinuing and reconnecting sewer service lines. EXTENSION OF CONNECTION CHARGES WATER 1. Main Extension Charge $5.00 times footage fronting on main. 2. Plant Capacity Charge $.50/gallon of demand* 3. Water Meter Connection Charges: 5/8" x 3/4" meter $100.00 1" meter $150.00 1-1/2" meter $250.00 2" meter $350.00 *Meters over 2" in size are charged upon the estimated actual cost of installation. Where actual charges differ from estimates, the difference will be refunded by the utility if the total cost is less than the estimate, or paid by the contributor prior to the initiation of water service if the actual cost exceed the estimated cost. - 5 LEG. 70/03 SEWER 1. Main Extension Charge $12.00 times footage fronting on main. 2. Plant Capacity Charge $.75/gallon of demand* *Plant Capacity Charges are computed by multiplying the daily rates of demand by the above rates for the specified service. The daily rated gallonage demand varies depending upon type of usage, for example, apartments = 250 gpd; single family residence 3/4" x 5/8" meter = 350 gpd; commercial units based upon projected actual demand. This Resolution shall become effective as of the 4th day of November , 1981. BOARD OF INDIAN & By: Attest: I i Clerk LEG. 70/03 TY COMMISSIONERS OF COUNTY, FLORIDA DEC 2 1981 8QoK 48 pnF29 r- -1 -7 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 0 205 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION ® """ CAR DEC 2 1981 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. SERVICE AVAILABILITY AND MAIN EXTENSION POLICY Gerard P. Mozian President GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 2.0 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION INDEX Rule No. Sheet No. 1.0 2.0 General Policy ............................ Availability 3.0 3.0 ...........0. .... ........0.0 Alain Extension and Connection (Plant 3.0 4.0 Capacity) Charges ......................... Gallons.Per Day, Water and Sewer Demand 3.0 Characteristics ........................... 4.0 5.0 Preparation of Developer Agreements ....... 4.0 6.0 Water and Sewer Capacity Allocations ...... 4.0 7.0 Water Service Only - Sewer Service Only ... 5.0 8.0 Water Meter Installation Fees ............. 5.0 9.0 Action by Governmental Authority .......... 6.0 10.0 Transfer of Contributed Property - Bills 11.0 of Sale .................................... ................................. InspectionFees .......... ... ............ 6.0 7.0 12.0 Inspection of Plumber's Hook -Up ........... 8.0 13.0 Adjustment Provisions ..................... 8.0 14.0 Prior Policy ... ..........................: 8.0 15.0 Extensions Outside Territory .............. 9.0 16.0 Distribution and Collection Systems 17.0 Constriction ............................... Inspections 9.0 18.0 ............................. Refundable Advances ....................... 10.0 10.0 19.0' Guaranteed Revenue Agreement ............... 11.0 20.0 Reserve Capacity Charge ................... 11.0 Exhibit "All............................... 12.0 DEC 2 1� Gerard P. Mozian President 6909 48 PnE ' uL1VL!\L1L iJL'r'LLVYI�IC:J1 U11L11.11-5, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 3.0 , VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION �� Pr�fE 1 BOOK 29_7 DEC GENERAL POLICY. General Development Utilities, Inc., a Florida corporation, hereinafter referred to as Utility, adopts and incorpor- ates herein by reference Part IX, Rules and Regulations for Service Availability for Water and Sewer Systems, of the Florida Public Service Commission, promulgated under Com- mission Order No. 6397. Utility will make available ser- vice and extensions of service under said Rules, subject to matters of economic feasibility, as defined in Rule No. 25-10.121 of the said Commission Rules and Regulations. This,Policy shall not apply to developer's agreements entered into between Utility and contributors which reflect policies implemented and contracts entered into prior to the adoption of Part IX, Rules and Regulations, of the Florida Public Service Commission. (25-10.120, F.A.C.) The word "person" as used in Rule 25-10.121(5), F.A.C., shall mean and include "political subdivision" as defined in subsection 1.01(9), Florida Statutes. 2.0 AVAILABILITY. The provisions of this Policy are available to contribu- tors throughout the territory subject only to matters of economic feasibilty. (For Rules governing service out- side the territory, see Paragraph 15.0 of this Policy.) (For reference to prior policies, see Paragraph 14.0 of this Policy.) (See Section 367.121(1)(d), Florida Stat- utes.) 3.0 MAIN EXTENSION AND CONNECTION (PLANT CAPACITY) C14-,kRGES. The following is the charge being made by Utility to con- tributors (including the Parent Company) upon approval of the Public Service Commission or other governmental agency having jurisdiction of this Policy, where water or sewer service is available or agreed to be made available, in the territory. "On-site" or "off-site" water distribution and sewage collection lines and facilities are included in these charges and provisions. Charges to contributors pursuant to this Policy are calcu- lated on a cost based upon the estimated demand of the con- tributors' proposed installation, upon the transmission and treatment facilities of the Utility, and is computed by multiplying the following rates by the daily rated gal- lons of demand set forth in Exhibit A, as modified by Paragraph 6.0 of this Policy. Connection (plant capacity) charges are stated per gallon demand for water and sewer service. (Continued to Sheet No. 4.0) Gerard P. Mozian President GENERAL DEV1LOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 4.0 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION (Continued from Sheet No. 3.0) Connection (plant capacity)_- Water: $ 0.50 Sewer: $ 0.75 Extension charges are stated at the charge per foot measured along front of the property to be served. ' o Main Extension Charge Water: $ 5.00 Sewer: $12.00 5.01 Main extension charges for service to customers outside Utility's certificated service area will be negotiated. (a) Such customers may be required to advance the full cost of on-site and off-site .mains, subject to refund of portions thereof in excess of the contributor's hydraulic share. (b) In addition to payment of the above, connection (plant capacity) charges will be required to support excess plant capacity dedicated to the contributor. 4.0 GALLONS PER DAY, ,VATER AND SFiVER nF!LV D C:�aRACT ERIST ICS . In Exhibit A, attached hereto, is a list of daily rated gallons of demands for various occupancies :yhicr. ;iill be used in ccmputing Connection (plant capacity`, and :Main Extension Charges. In the instance of common facilities for multiple dwelling units such as irrigation, laundering, recreation facilities, and commercial and coy:u�erciai/resi- dential facilities, determination of cc-ne-t_on io'_ant capacity) and :-gain extension charges wJ 1 be bases upon t e use characteristic defined by en1-ineeri.g data surplied by the prospect -ire contributor, as accepted by i"tili ter. (25-10.121(11), F.A.C. ) 5.0 PREPAPLA T I0:`: OF DE"ELOPE AGiZE=%1E` ; S . Utility may require that the contributor, in addition to the fees and charges set forth herein, bear the cost of preparation of developer agreement by independent counsel or persons qualified to draft and prepare such a;reements. Said charges shall rot exceed that amount ncr.,,al1y _o be contemplated for such service. (25-10.137, F.A.C.; 1-5-10.139, F.A.C.) 6.0 A!ATER A`;D SEINER CAPACTTN' .ILLC'C1710''S Upon payment by the contributor and _;.s proper execut-": of an agreement _or service ay.11aDillt`% PU:'SL1ant to thZJc? rules, Utility will reserve and wi 11 allccate to the (Continued to Sheet No. 5.0) DEG c' ���� Gerard P. ,bzia418 e��F 8 K+ President ���� v.c.rL:.A" UOv �LUYblL"V i' U i TLI i I EJ, IVC. ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 5.0 DEC 2 IgSJO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION ♦ x m"E (Continued prom Sheet. No. 4.0) contributor the portion o- water and server plant and off- site line capacity as set for=h in the agree. If ment. , for example, the contributor sihall cai cu:late de. -.land of 350 gallons of water per day per si.-igle family residence, that capacity will be built or reserved for the contribu- tor. Utility will not be obl-gated to provide capacity or service- in excess of that allocation and :nay require con- sumers to cujtail use which exceeds such allocated camaclty. In those areas where the exper-enca 0- Utility has demon- strated that the demand characteristics of customers of the community exceed those daily rated gallons of demand set forth -n Exhibit A, Utility shall require that the con- tributor pay those fees and mace the necessary comm-;r based on the actual and experienced demand, and not the average demand. Thus, when Utility shall de.mcnstrate to the developer that its records and ex-merierce show, 'or example, that a single-family residence or: the Lype which the contributor proposes to build i -a the spec; communityplaces demand during certa-n ti:tes of the year equal to 600 gallons or' water per day, then the charges per g3llOns de- ziand set =Orth in Paragraph 3.0 Of this Policy shall be multi-pli-ed by 0500 gallons. Ir_ ao event shall Utility be required to build or accept pians, specie "ations fees charges or agreements a �c ed ' ��-e:nents pr..d' -at- upon demand nor water service of less than .350 gallons persingle-=,;;__y r=si- dential equivalent Or sewer service or less `nai 350 gal=ors per residential equivalent- per day. (25--0:121(13), ?.0 ��JAI=R SEARV 1C_= ONLY - SE 1 1;=R S E R. VICE C\;LY. In any instance where eit ler water or sel er servize - onl�r is =urn -shed without t?, .. ithou� e companioncon- .: , nection (dant Capacity) Charge SI -all be =0r service only. S 0 IWATER M -Z T 1R 'VS�.�•LLA: ivN '_", Meter S _e C -arZe Maxizum ;tater Use "-n. c << 5 3 x 3/411$ 100.00 1,• 20 gallons per nin.u'te �., 150.00 SO ga:lens oe:- ni :ute Z ?50.00 1 ou ;a�',ons per 'a M, .1u �ae 350.00 160 llOns :et- Z:nuze B (Continued to No. 5.0) M Gerard P. Mo_zian President GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 6.0 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION (Continued from Sheet No. 5.0) Utility will not be obligated to furnish water in ex- cess of "Maximum Water Use Demand." Recommended tMaximum Rate for continuous operation will be 1/3 of the Maximum Rate listed. Meters over -2 inches in size are charged upon the estimated actual cost of installation. Where actual charges differ from estimates, the difference will be refunded"by Utility if the total cost was less than the estimate, or paid by the contributor prior to initiation of water service if the actual cost exceeds the estimated cost. The contribu-' for will be furnished a copy of -the invoice at the time of installation. 9.0 ACTION BY GGVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. Requirements by appropriate governmental authorities to CP limit -or curtail utility services, such as irrigation moratoriums, may restrict the use of utility services in addition to the maximum water use demand set forth in Paragraph 8.0 of this Policy. Contributors and customers obtain reservation for service or the service itself sub- ject to notice of this limitation. 10.0 TRANSFER OF CONTRIBUTED PROPER'T'Y - BILLS OF SATE. Utility reserves the right to construct all facilities for providing water and sewer service to the point of connec tion. If Utility determines that it will accept such facilities constructed by others, the following rules will apply Each contributor,.(developer) who has constructed portions of a water distribution and sewage collection system shall convey such component parts of the water distribution and sewage collection system to Utility by bill of sale, in form satisfactory to Utility's attorney, together with such evidence as may be required by Utility that the water and/or sewer systems proposed to be transferred to Utility are free of all liens and encumbrances. Any facilities in the category of consumer's connections of the customer's side of the connection point shall not be transferred to Utility and shall remain the property of individual customers, their successors or assigns. (Continued to Sheet No. 7.0) DEC A 1^81 Gerard P. Moziar� �� �7 Presidentl0`" piers L- GENER L DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 7.0 VEA%WHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION u�C �'� �. UN (Continued from Sheet No . 6. 0) 11.0 Utility shall not be required to accept title to any com- ponent part of the water distribution or sewage collection system until Utility's engineer has approved the construc- tion of said lines, accepted the tests to determine that such construction is in accordance with.the criteria established by Utility, and thereafter evidenced its accep- tance of such lines for Utility's ownership, operation, and maintenance. Contributor shall maintain accurate cost records estab- lishing the construction costs of all utility facilities constructed by contributor. Such cost information shall be furnished to Utility concurrently with the bill of sale, and such cost information shall be -a prerequisite for the acceptance by Utility of the portion of the water distribu- tion and sewage collection system constructed by the con- tributor. Utility reserves the right to refuse connection and to deny the commencement of service to any contributor seeking to be connected to portions of.the water distribution and sewage collection system until such time as the provisions of this section have been fully met. With respect to a development which constitutes a "single unit" such as a mobile home park, a shopping center, or apartment -complex, Utility's oblig-ation for service and maintenance of lines and facilities located whollywithin such developments, and not in public rights of way, shall extend solely to repair and/or replacement of the lines or facilities, and Utility will not be liable in any manner for damages, replacement or repairs to surface areas. INSPECTION FEES. Any engineering plans or designs for, or construction of facilities by a contributor (developer) which are to be- come a part of Utility's system, will be subject to review and inspection by Utility. For this service, Utility may g chare an inspection fee based upon the actual cost to Utility of inspection of facilities constructed -by contribu- tors or independent contractors for connection with the facilities of Utility. Such inspection fee shall be paid by the contributor in addition to all other char7es above stated, as a condition precedent to service. Gerard P. Mozian President GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 8.0 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION 12:0 INSPECTION OF PLUMBER'S HOOK-UP. It shall be the responsibility of the contributor or its plumbing contractor to connect contributor's plumbing in - CP stallation with the. water or sewer system. Utility re- serves the right to inspect all such connections to be assured that the same are properly made in accordance with Utility's rules governing such connections, and that the connection, as made, is free from infiltration. The contributor shall notify Utility of any proposed inter- connection with the facilities of Utility, and connection may be made without the presence of Utility's inspector. However, such connection shall remain open until inspec- tion by Utility and until notice of the approval of such connection is furnished to the developer in accordance jvith the practices and procedures of Utility. any connec- tion covered without the benefit of inspection will result in the contributor being required to reopen the connection for subsequent inspection. If Utility fails to inspect the connection within 48 hours after notice that the same is ready to inspect, the connection shall be deemed approved by Utility. 13.0 ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS. Governmental Authority: The charges set forth in this Policy are subject to adjustment by appropriate action of the governmental agency having jurisdiction o� this Pclicy either upon the initiative of the governmental agency or by request of Utility. (25-10.141, F.A.C.) 14.0 . PRIOR POLICY. Prior to `he adoption of this Policy, Utility had, by virtue of its obligations, established other -policies which will remain in effect until the obligations pursuant to those policies have been fulfilled. Under a previous program, Utility constructs water facilities at its own cost cover- ing approximately 51,775 lots to which water service would be extended by Utility within sixty days after the building permit has been obtained and notification of commencement of construction has been given to Utility. The cost of such water facilities is to be borne solely by Utility as an investment. The only charge to the customer would be a meter installation fee. Utility made a commit ent to provide seiner service to approximately 4,341 lots, and facilities will be installed as.an investment of Utility 1 •. (Continued to Sheet No. 9.0) Gerard P. Mozian President {{��r� BQOK 48 PAPF,302 r GENERAL DEVELOPMEI'tT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGINAL SHEE i N0. 9.0 1 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION AN PA4,03 .DEC 2 19" (Continued from Sheet No. 8.0) % 15.0 16.0 to those lots. These commitments by Utility were based upon contracts :Wade in the past and are not available to prospective customers or contributors. A list showing the lots to which service will be made available, as an invest- ment by Utility, is available in Utility's office, and may be examined by any customer or prospective customer during the regular business hours of Utility's office. (25-10.120, F.A.C.) EXTENSION OUTSIDE TERRITORY. Providing service outside Utility's territory involves formal notice and formal proceedings before the Florida Public Service Commission and, therefore, entails engineer- ing, administrative and legal expenses in addition to costs incurred by Utility in providing service within its ter- ritory. Utility will, therefore, not be obligated to provide its services outside the territory unless the con- tributor agrees, in advance, to defray those additional expenses and pay to Utility the estimated costs thereof. The advance payment will be adjusted to conform with actual expenses after the proceedings have been concluded. Utility will further make such extensions outside the ter- ritory only if the net income to be derived from prospec- tive consumers within the area to be served by the proposed extension will provide a fair return on Utility's in- vestment in the proposed extension, transmission, and treatment facilities involved. Utility will not extend its facilities under circumstances where the extensions will cause service to existing customers to suffer either as a result of reduction of capacity to provide its service to customers, or the diminishment of the economic capability Of Utility to meet its financial commitments. (See Section 367.061; 367.121(2), Florida Statutes) DISTRIBUTION AND COLLECTION SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION. If any on-site distribution and collection systems are con- structed by the contributor as set forth in Paragraph 10.0 herein, Utility shall establish specifications based upon good engineering and public utility practices, and the con- tributor shall not less than thirty (30) days prior to com- mencing construction, furnis� `� Utility with a complete copy of the plans and specifications of the proposed on-site collection and distribution system. Utility shall have twenty (20) days in which to determine the acceptability . of the plans and specifications furnished to it by the con- tributor. If Utility shall object to the plans and specifica- tions or any part thereof, the contributor shall defer the commencement of construction pending the resolution of Utility's objections. (25-10.127, F.A.C.) Gerard P. Moz4an President . GENERAL DEVELOP<<ENT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGINAL SHEET NO. 10.0 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION 17.`0 INSPECTIONS. Utility shall have, at all times during the construction, the right to inspect the construction of the on-site dis- tribution and/or, collection systems being built by the con- tributor, or his agents or employees, as set forth in Paragraph 11.0 of this Policy and receive payment of fees referred to therein. 18.0 REFUNDABLE ADVANCES.. Utility may require, in addition to the charges set forth herein, a refundable advance by a contributor to tempor- arily defray the cost of any off-site extension of water _and/or sewer mains, pumping stations, and other facilities necessary to connect the developer's property with the then proper point of interconnection with Utility's exist- ing water and sewer facilities, in size needed to provide service to the subject property. The 'contributor may -be required to advance to Utility additional main extension charges based upon the anticipated hydraulic load require- ments of the undeveloped property in order that such off- site facilities may be constructed to serve the developer's property and be in accordance with Utility's master plan for service to the immediate surrounding area. Charges paid by the contributor over and above the contributor's hydraulic share of the off-site facilities, shall be re- funded to the developer in accordance with the terms and conditions of a refunding agreement which Utility will execute with the contributor. The refund agreement will provide for a pian of refund based upon connection of other properties to the extent of their h"ydraulic share with other properties that will be served by the off-site facilities and styled at the expense of the contributor. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section, Utility may limit the life of the refund agreement to a term of at least seven years, after which time a portion of the re- fund not made to the contributor by the terns and condi- tions of the refund agreement will be retained by Utility, and such refund agreement will be cancelled. In no event shall a contributor recover an amount greater than the di:.- ference between the capitalized cost of such off-site improvements and the developer's own hydraulic share of such improvement. Utility will not include any interest upon the refund of the developer's advance. (25-10.121(20) F.A.C.) Gerard P. Mozian President DEC 2 1991 - BOOK 48--wM4 FP ­ G ArY A 4EC2, L DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGINAL '9 MET A 81. f4ri 7 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION 19.0 GUARANTEED REVENUE AGREEMENT. If authorized by the Commission pursuant to Order and under such terms and conditions as may be authorized under said Commission Order, Utility may establish a policy of requiring, as a condition precedent to service, that the contributor (developer) enter into a guaranteed revenue agreement, as defined in Commission'Rule No. 25-10.121(12). 20.0 RESERVE CAPACITY CHARGE. Pursuant to Section 25-10.13. and 25-10.133, Florida Administrative Code, Utility may enter into an agreement with a contributor requiring contributor to pay a minimum guaranteed connection charge. If contributor wishes to insure that there will be available sufficient plant capa- city at various planned stages of development and if Utility agrees to reserve such capacity for contributor, the contributor will be required to pay applicable fixed costs including depreciation, property tax, insurance and inter- est costs on plant capacity reserved for the -period of the reservation. Gerard P. Mozian President GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. ORIGI�,r4L SHEET NO. 12.0 VERO SHORES AND VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS DIVISION EXHIBIT "A" SCHEDULE OF DAILY RATED GALLONAGE FOR VARIOUS OCCUPANCY Types of Building Usages Apartments. ......:.............................. Bars and Cocktail Lounges .... ..... ............. Boarding Schools (student and staff) ............. Bowling Alleys (toilet wastes only, per lane).... Country Clubs (per member) ... . ........... 0..... Day Schools (students and staff) ................. Drive-in Theatres (per car space) ................ Factories (with showers) .......................... Factories (no showers). ... ............. Hospitals (with laundry)............,. ......... Hospitals (no laundry) .................•.......... Hotels and Motels ................................ Laundromats.. ................................. Mobile Home Parks...... ..... .......... Movie Theatres, Auditoriums, Churches (per seat). NursingHomes ................ 6................... Office Buildings....... ... .... Public Institutions (other than those listed herein)... ................................... Restaurants(per seat) ........................... Single Family Residential .Fater: 3/4" x 5/8" meter.....* ................. 1't meter ................................ 1-1/2" meter ........................... Sewer:........ ................................. Townhouse Residences (3). .. Stadiums, Frontons, Ball Parks, etc. (per seat).. Stores (.rithout kitchen wastes) .................. Speculative Buildings .:.......... :.............. Warehouses ........................................ (1) gpcd - gallons per capita per day 250 gpd 5 gpcd (1) 75 gpcd 100 gpd (2) 25 gpcd 10 gpcd S gpd 30 gpcd 10 gpd/100 sq. ft. 250 gpd/bed 200 gpd/bed 200 gpd/rm. or unit 225 gpd/wash. mach= 300 gpd/trailer 3 gpd 150 gpd/100 sq. st. 10 gpd/100 sq. ft. 75 gpcd 50 gpcd 350 gpd 600 gpd 1150• gpd 350 gpd 250 gpd 3 gpd 5 gpd/100 sq. ft. 30 gpd plus 10 gpd,' 100 sq. ft. 30 gpd plus 10 gpd..' 1000 so. tt. (2) GPD - gallons per day (3) Condominiums shall be rated in accordance with the type (apartments, townhouses, etc.) NOTE: Sewage gallonage refers to sanitary sewage flow on unit basis for average daily flow in gallons per day, 1 •� Gerard P. Mozian President DE C 2 191 Conservation Lighting conversion Agreement with Florida Power & Light Company is hereby made a part of the Minutes as approved at the meeting of November 18, 1981. �a CONSERVATION LIGHTING CONVERSION AGREEMENT ' Form 216H ( Non . Stocked ) Rev. 7/31 THIS AGREEMENT, made this 18th day of November , 19—U by and between Indian River County on behalf cf ,itself and the effected :1 un i c i al _ -Service Street_'i gnt V i stri ct_ _ I its successors and assigns (hereafter called oi-, "Customer"), and FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State Florida, its successors and assigns (hereafter called the "Company"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Company now serves the Customer at various locations with Company owned street lighting service and, WHEREAS, the Company and the Customer desire to promote conservation by converting present street lighting sys. tems of Incandescent and/or Mercury Vapor lamps to the more efficient High Pressure Sodium Vapor source, NOW, THEREFORE, in recognition of the foregoing recitals and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agree- ments contained herein, the parties hereto do agree as follows: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Conversions Al conversions pursuant to this agreement will be at existing locations as indicated by the Customer records. All conver- sions shall conform to the replacement proposal marked Exhibit "D" and made a part hereof by this reference, unless designated ott,erwise by the Customer in writing or recommended otherwise by the Company and accepted by the Customer in writing accord - in . to Exhibits "B" or "C", Original Tariff Sheet Nos. 9.113 and 9.114. 2. Ownership Such conversions will be made at the Company's expense and all poles, wires, fixtures, lamps, and other appliances, supplied and used by the Company in furnishing service herein provided for shall, at all times, be and remain the property of the Company. 3. Conversion Schedules The Customer agrees that all scheduling and completion of designated conversions under the terms of this Agreement will he ::t the sole discretion and management of the Company. The Company makes no representations as to the expected completion dare of the designated conversions. 4. Incorporation The following Street Lighting Agreements(s) is (are) expressly incorporated in its (their) entirety herein and shall expire on Lite date that this Conservation Lighting Conversion Agreement expires as provided in paragraph five (5) herein. Parties Date e Exhib-4t"S" January 6, 1965 I }ii, r;cw agreement is controlling to the extent of any inconsistency. If no such Street Lighting Agreement exists, the Customer ;il execute same simultaneously with the execution of this agreement. Term of Contract The Customer and the Company mutually agree that the life of this Agreement shall be for a term of ten (10) years from the d.rte of this Agreement and shall extend thereafter for further successive periods of five (5) years from the expiration of the sinal ten (10) year term, or from the expiration of any extension thereof. The Agreement shall be extended automatically unless �ithcr party shall have given written notice to the other of its desire to terminate this Agreement. The written notice shall be given lot less than ninety (90) days before the date of expiration of the initial ten (10) year term, or any extension thereof. Page 1 of 2 C 2 1981 BOOK 48, PnF 308 DEC 1981 FAUX -9 6. Payment The Customer agrees to take electric energy and service supplied to each strcet light in accordance with the rate schedule set forth in Exhibit "A", which is attached to and made part of this Agreement, or any successive rate schedule which may be ap- proved from time to time by the appropriate regulatory authority. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their officers thereunto duly a:,thorized the day and year first above written. V,'itnesses-for the Customers: 'Nitnesses for the Company: Attest: FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY By . District Manager Date Attest: Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT B REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION A,ND/OR REPLACEMENT OF STREET LIG11TING SYSTEM 19 Florida Power & Light Company Gentlemen: In -accordance with the terms and conditions of the Street Lighting Agreement dated , 19 , this request is made for a modification and/or replacement of the facilities in the Street Lighting System within the limits of this body's jurisdiction. The modification and/or replacement requested is/are as follows (describe fully): As per Agreement livaxu vx- cir1 IOnmi scanners (title) Indian River County -on behalf of itself and the effected Mmicipal Service Street (Customer's Name)Light Districts Request granted 19 , subject to your approval of the following charges which are payable by you before any modification and/or replacement can be undertaken: Request denied 19 , for the following reason FLORIDA POWER $ LIGHT COMPeYNY ' (Signature) District Manager Form 2169 (Non -Stocked) Rev. 8/79' PO1 & IJGHT COMPANY E7CHIBIT C . REQUEST FOR M43VAL AND/OR ADDITION OF FACILITIES I WK 04 844$311. . 9.114 19_ Florida Power 6 Light Cot -many Gentlemen: In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Street Lighting Agreement dated , 19 , this request is made for a removal and/or addition of facilities in the existing Street Lighting System within the limits of this body's jurisdiction. The removal and/or addition requested is/are as follows (describe fully): As per Agreement Approved as of the following date , 19 by: FLORIDA POWER € LIGHT COMPANY (Signature) (Title) l-ssued by: J. J. Hudiburg, ident Effective: July 27, 1979 a isslon Indian River County on behalf of (Customer's Name) itself and the effected municipal Service Street Light Districts EXHIBIT "D" Conservation Lighting Conversion Agreement J - Replacement Proposal• PrP -Lent 4500 MV open bottom 4500 MV post top 7000 MV open bottom 7000 h1V post top 11000 MV cobra head 20500 MV cobra head 36500 MV cobra head 55000 MV cobra head - 50000 HPSV 13000 HPSV open bottom** 13000 HPSV post top 1000 Incandescent 2500 Incandescent 4000 Incandescent 6000 Incandescent 10000 Incandescent Proposed Replacement (Lumens -Type) 5800 HPSV aff �y 5800 HPSV post top 5800 HPSV off 9500 HPSV post top 9500 HPSV f 22000 HPSV+"t-off 50000 HPSV su+eff 50000 HPSV 16000 HPSV wt -off 16000 HPSV post top 5800 HPSV eat -off 5800 HPSV cu" f 5800 HPSV4u -off 5800 HPSV "am f 9500 HPSV &6"ff Notes: # Except where the Company recommends otherwise due to design criteria. ** 13000 lumens high pressure sodium vapor luminaire �s inefficient compared to available replacements. ® Form 216H1 (Non -Stocked) Rev 7/01 en 48 fmf .312 1981 roots iia a n.P, r^ar -4,a ► a do ....o EXHIBIT „S" DEC 2 1991 Tins Ad 7T avAt _ day L Boar�. Board of County Coissi., of Tr,.i dR/Rj.rer Cori , . 1 by and be:.roea n Munrapal oTT'-d sad eristiag cedar t:.e taws of the of pkwwa, atm h. sus (hereafter called Graoaacr) aa�d FI1Jl�IDA PC3 8A 6P LIGHT CJf�APf9f, aaad/or ttumissw (6eneaft tsliad Compaaty). Dorm jon Cr�anisad sad tatuder the It'. of the brace of Florida, is sxxmawn THAT for and in cc%o is d "b000 od tL4 ass, of Clare Dollar( li r.aa : LM arrresaents herein Vet focti, t6 its" a>raaaot Sod agog a, d bT est PAM berets to the other, and of ti,t mvtnnsats _I 8..,ettoN 1. In "'0 far W er"onable dsligetaoa wail eaabk it to do so, to furnish electric anergy and serviow to Cusaosoer for the attert bgbting "-sa orit&n the wrporae; limits of Indian River Count Vp Florida in +hp area s^rr33 by the ^ in accordance with the terms &rad pn»iaaoras S8ctmN 2. To install on Company's at distribution pol thirty (30) days after tempt of written notice. from Cw• ower, evidenced by a Lmer from Cuatomcr'a t.Pttng forth thsL ouch rlat�a baa been duly atrtboriaed b under Cwa"toraer's eorpocate ae:4 Y coots rniag body, overhead bracact sweet lighLa. and to connect &aid street lights to Company's aye -head street lighting circuits, now or bareafts inaalled i In ^n, p ; (,'' provided, however, that in the event it shall be neceaaary for Company to extend its atreet LRn thtt g arcuit, more than 3 order Floridtoo roach any additional overhead bracket sca light coat, in excess of 1(DO fat ordered by Ctwtamer, as herein provided. Ckutomer agrca to reimburse Company for the of awaking such atcnaion to its street lighting circuits. 5eczmte 3. To verse Customer's "White Way" and/or other type of ornamental pool or ornamental bracket cosset lighdag arxim which is now, or may hereafter be, ina itUtd, or any extension thereof, and to extend Company's overhead stre" lightin, areuias to the Point of cote c --tion With C.uatomer's underground cable connecting together street L hu forraiug (;ustomer's White 'Way street lighting sya6rcacm ao cause acted by said ord,mer, Provided, however, that in the event it "bull be necessary for Compar.y to tit" fts street ligbtin circtaits amore ti,an ><00 fit is order to reach such Point of connection, Customer agrees to rumburoe Company for the Cost. in esoaas U 100 feel, of r."ing such trMnsion to its over Bead street lighting areaim UcmoN 4. To change the location of any street light in use or to Vubstitute for any street fight in us4 at one loation any other stmt light of the same type and ownership, and of the same or greater rating in lumens, candle-power or wattage. not in use ae any other beation, upon payment by the Customer of mat o f auk ocppoo �_ aubacitvtioa and expo® �fety (1C) days' written notice from the Cw- tozr evidence$ by ktter from Custtnrber' .J that such cleanse in location or substitution o street light has n duly a rued under Customer's corporate Ma. setting forth governing body. CUSTOMER AGREES: AR11C LE M SccnoN 1. To purchase from Cooc,pany = tketr-ic energy and services teetLUary for the operation of tbt atswit aghtfng syat= within � corporaer: thrifts ofTndia,*1 ::fiver ivunt.r� Florida, fir. the * a r --Ted ay ;,:lr the minimum requirements for which shall at trig times a° cn is now. or may heruf�t b2, io hereof, pino that of an additional installations made that of the presort installation a art forth under Section 1 of Az6de by Goan an and/or Oustomer, under Artide I of this Agreement. Sant 2. To pay for an the emrgq and services furniahed by Company at any businevs office or pay sutknn of the Company, in &=rdanec with the acbeduks attached hereto, made a part hereof and marked_— S 13 SACnoN 3. To ootsatruet, renew, repair and maintain the undeircund cable or overhead conductors connecting its "White Way and/or oslaer of ornamental post or ornamental bracket tercet lirhti.nc system and the posts thereof so tb.t at all tutu acid street lint. 'ng "Tanen' r,hA tie 1n a safe eondraioo and in the event it aha11 become aectaaarq to rcinjosot or rebuild said ply served in accordance with good electrical practim to so reinforce -and rebuild said syscanr in order that it tray be from soy and al! k>aa, Dost, damage or expense that maJ7 be cau&ed to Company by reason of the failure onpthe rnd save Company harm}tss oorwcruck renew, repair and/or maintain maid street lighting system in accordance with the Provisions hereof, part of Customer to pr,perly S,CrsoN 1, ib�at the 2re9etlt `- cre" lfg,6ts,ag WYMM Vkbin the Indian River Countys_Florida, within the area ser7ed b the Company °Dfp°r`� of WiU of _ .^a._ 11 L.* ti, pi�rr..,.�, n Por Straat. Lights at various locations set forth on Florida pm]w ,Sr Light ",r• v Drawing No. E -,-(,4-442p Location U0 �da.tod June 20th: 190% and Drawing identified as'� -_" 1j 2 and 3, Location 220 dated November 17 lye The above described -'savings a -a attached and are a suppocud on bracket type fixtures, owned by Company bar 0-r—r r-f?2'Bf'I°:eFt. oupported on "White Way" and/or other type of ornamental post or ornasoentd bracket fixtures. otirsed by Comfrany, and wPPOC on "VAitt way" and/or other type of on --W peat oe arsemeaW bad &ft tea. "nod by Coa�aer. Same ti I That by "stmt b ", as used iet dais A.grecmtm is snesat time kazieg of ids , awnsse$, � par pw�c Plane oshar chew public hemi a. k4 Fridges, and SaenoN 3. 71M no liability to furnish or take service shall exist at any time that eith- party -Ws tb- Ages b7 t sariles, lockouts, firm nota, act$ of God or the pubic ear , is ��°� from complg the control of the in t6 Opinion Of pparty or rehashporasy ' o*. to arae snms cc other Cerapany, is neuaeary for the purpose of repairing or making m effiaeat Ila or �� ej cq � pm� y part of its electrical generatinq Sacmu 6. Th" Company sha11 use reasonable drligtoce to provide continuous service during lighting houM and, hs,,ng a"d seaamasWAS db7saace. SW nes be leabls for any outage. Secnom S. That Company � for any lam installed other lamps of at kart 4XiM y as Improvements is tea sat may MaWA ruh lnmpa aval lde, ba nn chane, shy he illumfinatiag raga c Ltd taiapo vrtbout Company's coal Company UZU replace any ►anep satb ond � � in mak. °ua. � err � Caadla power cc sat a at tube writflen request ref (;homer ev>&ncai by a kaur from Custnner' corporate feat, setting forth t2 such request has been duty authorize by Cusaxuer's aisle u>rder cestomer's bilk thereafter &Wrendered & be correspo"ngly increased. 7. in mliich cax tba monthly bell or SsCMX 6. Tlsat this Agreement shall be for a term of ten (10) rears finer .�.'tY1L1�Y'9 $�a �� a� eatebd far a fwtbav period or prr^.o& of five (9) Tzars from tLe *rpt on of Rise $aid aaa 10 19 aa9m by WrWarn Rork* groan by Wther pa y r.® the other sot Mom wren rilaxrgy (90) teoP bees abase ( ) Bim% or arry examoiasm thereof, • t rhes! ten (10) jearq or any es®em�on tlsrrof. ek6ar Pam s6�ajlff hest s reed ka ' (30) Sys before t$t abet of eery yriomt eo t� e$ sent be requived to futad and/or carve afioditionaJ otreet a'7 ta—ram froom a tip a i:toA twa (1) yeas pirathm cJ " Age or of any acteWoo letteof, DEC— ' 1%70 P"InF` . C21991 7. Thu aY��ld Cgswmtr fail at any time or from time to time to par for $e electric tat' and nervi dcreunder or oehcrwi� fu] to grrf�ras an of the terms and cand,t:tions of tins r" cea furnia>acd any additional installations undr. Article of tSii Agreement, Company. u its opjos, away rtfust to maks und-s until Gabor cr has made such a A;scat and/or cease to a=pply elactric energy and serum so Cuatemer here- bsing ander,xomd &rad �p yments or otboerRriee fully complied =ply the terms and cond;tirem of thin A`rec$ezlt it and saeferm lsovrret, t. at such rsivaoal p raaJ<e additional and/cc discontum"nce as the auppf ial of dectrk cagy �ra a brra $ of cais .4grvma* by Company nor aha$ ani nay of the turns a::d corAitiooe YOM A4r*emenL SeL'rs7x >i Thsc t4#s Alrecm.nc supervedet ail prsvicus Agreezmnts oc ins. either writtes or serbaL hereeofo, in dfect b Cum and Co•ntany, zta�3e vrh rs�a-s to mamm contained lutein and,. duly czeatri, OMMh oos the Avrwxaeat be- tteem � p�ssmes I�f'QtA. Sim 9. That this Agrranent sh&n inure to the btnefft of and be binding upon the successors of C4 rstomcr and tb a xv-caon and/or asagns of Company. IN WITNESS WHMUM, tin part#ts Eertao have herea:nto cawed five instrument to be asned in triplicate by dwt duly h au±b.oeiaed offian and ti+eir ofiidal sca.is m be —unto affixed the dag and year firat abc Witness for Qttoocnar: t Plasida Witmeseaa for Company: Approeesi as to ftp and cmt ctneat this day 19_ Attorney for Florida 3- 7 -0 11LC6ili: Ckh L _I There being no further business, on Motion made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 4:08 o'clock P.M. Attest: Clerk 93 em 48 Ptu'll 6