Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/17/1982Wednesday, February 17, 1982 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, February 17, 1982, at 8:30 o'clock A.M. Present were Don C. Scurlock, Jr., Chairman; Alfred Grover Fletcher, Vice Chairman; Dick Bird; Patrick B. Lyons, and William C. Wodtke, Jr. Also present were Neil A. Nelson, County Administrator; L. S. "Tommy" Thomas, Inter- governmental Coordinator; Gary Brandenburg, Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; Jeffrey K. Barton, Finance Director, Dan Fleischman, Bailiff; and Virginia Hargreaves and Janice Caldwell, Deputy Clerks. The Chairman called the meeting to order. Attorney Brandenburg led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, and Rev. Robert Dickinson, Asbury United Methodist Church, gave the invocation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 16, 1981. Commissioner Fletcher requested that the Motion on Page 82 approving an impact fee re the Pebble Bay sewer system be corrected to reflect that the vote was 4 to 1 with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 16, 1981, as corrected. The Chairman asked if there were any additions -or corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 6, 1982. FEB 171982 ROOK 4 n`:•.r830 f eiyi, FEB 171982 BOK 48 PAH 83 On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 6, 1982, as written. ADDITIONS TO AGENDA Attorney Brandenburg wished to add an emergency item in regard to a proposed agreement between the County and Reinhold Construction regarding drawdown of certain retainage monies. On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke,'the Board unanimously added to today's agenda the emergency item requested by Attorney Brandenburg. CLERK TO BOARD ITEM A = Lease vs. Purchase of Data Processing Equipment Finance Director Barton came before the Board to make a presentation recommending lease purchase of IBM System 38 as per the following memo: February 11, 1982 To: Board of County Commissioners From: Jeffrey K. Barton, Finance Director Subject: Lease Purchase IBM System 38 P. 0. BOX 1028 VERO BEACH • FLORIDA 32960 As background, when the decision was being made in 1979 to upgrade our old data processing equipment, we wanted equipment that would be "state- of-the-art" and had the ability to beexpanded for our future use require- ments for the next 8 yo 12 years, The IBM System 38 was chosen for these reasons. We entered into a government lease contract which is upgraded annually to match our Fiscal Year. A portion of the monthly lease accrues to purchase of the system. The present system's lease payment for FY 81-82 is $6,679.00 per month. The proposed lease -purchase for the present system on a 60 month basis is $5,748.80 per month - a saving of $930.20 per month. This savings should be used for expanding the present system. The proposal for the system expansion will increase capacity of processor by 2-1/4 times plus 5 additional CRT's (for a total of 12) for $1,435.00 per month. The net increase in monthly payments of $504,80 will increase our capabilities to perform the data processing function for the county. It is my recommendation. to enter into the 60 month lease purchase for the following reasons: 1) Known costs for data processing equipment for the next 60 months. 2) Current storage capacity is being 90% utilized and upgrade must be done for any possible project expansionover current level. Finance Officer Barton went over the figures involved in detail, emphasizing the growing need for expansion; the fact that we have an ever increasing rent payment; and also the fact that we now are at the point where we have just about maximized the credit we can accrue towards purchase. Chairman Scurlock's basic question was whether we have done enough analysis of alternate systems to lock ourselves in for the next 8-12 years. Mr. Barton noted that this analysis was done at the time we purchased the original system. Commissioner Fletcher commented that he had talked to some computer people, and they all felt this was a good system. 3 FEB 171982 . P'OK 8 -GE 832 FEB 171982 800K 48 F4GE 83j Discussion on maintenance and funding continued, and Mr. Barton informed the Board that there is a separate maintenance contract, and this is included in the figures presented for the monthly basis. The funding comes from the regular monthly payment account, and we have enough to pay the additional the rest of this year; there will be a small modification next year. Attorney Brandenburg pointed out that the lease purchase agreement will have to provide that the payments are to be out of non -ad valorem tax dollars, and Mr. Barton felt the funds that the enterprises are paying to the General Fund for services could be earmarked for this purpose. On Motion by 'Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously authorized the Finance Director to change from a lease agreement to a lease purchase agreement for the data processing equipment with the additional items as outlined in Mr. Barton's letter of February 11, 1982 and authorized signature of the Chairman subject to review and approval of the Attorney. Said Agreement will be made a part of the record when executed and received. Item B - Errors and Omissions Report - 1980 Tax Roll Finance Director Barton explained that this is a yearly occurrence whereby the tax bills sent out are reconciled with what was finally' received, accounting for all errors, adjustments, etc., and it is required that all five Commissioners sign this report. On Motion by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the Errors and Omissions Report from the Tax Collector for the 1980 Tax Roll (Real Property and Tangible Personal Property) and authorized the signatures of all the Commission members. Said Errors and Omissions Report is on file in the office of the Clerk. CONSENT AGENDA A. Use of Funds from Seized Property Account Attorney Brandenburg requested that this item be deferred to a later agenda as he had a question about it. On Motion by Commissionet Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously agreed to defer Consent Agenda Item A to the next agenda. B. Progress Report - Hazardous Structure, Davis Temple The Board reviewed the following report: TO: The Honorable Board of DATE: January 28-, 1982 FILE: County Commissioners FROM(-� ` • Neil `Nelson County Administrator SUBJECT: PROGRESS REPORT HAZARDOUS . STRUCTURE - DAVIS TEMPLE CHURCH OF GOD - GIFFORD, FLORIDA REFERENCES: This letter is the second progress report (60 days) of the three reports (90 days) which are required by the County Commission Board on hazardous structures, belonging to the Davis Temple Church of God. Thus far a zoning permit has been issued. The Health Department requirements have been approved and the blueprints, by Total Develop- ment, have been processed through the Building Department at City Hall. (See attached letter from Total Development.) The staff recommends that letters be mailed to Total Development and the Davis Temple Church of God, advising them of the final 30 days remaining to start construction. On Motion by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously accepted the -above report and approved the staff recommendation therein. 5 FEB 171982 p°OK 48 P%+uT 834 Pr -- 82 FEB 1719 BOOK 48 PAGE 835 C. Authorized Public Hearing re Undeveloped Coastal Barriers The Board reviewed the Administrator's memo, as follows: TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: February 8, 1982 FILE: the Board of County. Commissioners FROM: Neil A. Nelson County, Administrator SUBJECT: UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS REFERENCES: Skip Bafalis, District 10 Congressman to Hon. Patrick B. Lyons. dated Jan. 20, 1982 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: The U. S. Interior Department has prepared a set of maps which delineate certain undeveloped coastal areas which, after October 1, 1983, are to be ineligible for Federal Flood Insurance. The Interior Department has pre- pared a full explanation of what is to be considered "undeveloped" and the County staff has received and read this information. The County has been asked to review the maps for revisions based upon the proper definitions. Comment is due March 22, 1982, to Secretary James Watt of the U.S. Depart- ment of Interior. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: 'Basically, the area delineated as Undeveloped Coastal Barrier includes the land north of Indian River Shores extending north to the Sebastian Inlet State Recreation Area, excluding the Wabasso. Beach area. Specifically, this area includes: 1) Section 6, Township 32S, Range 40E. 2) Section 1, Township 32S, Range 39E. 3) Sections 3,4,9,10,14,15,22,23,25,26,35,06 Township 31S Range 39E. 4) Section 33, Township 30S, Range 39E. The above listed areas are all east of the Intercoastal Waterway and; the land from the St. Lucie County Line, northward, approximately 1750 feet (approximately to the northern end of Round Island) specifically described' as follows: A) Portions of Sections 33 and 34, Township 33S, Range 40E. All lying east of the Intracoastal Waterway. I•luch of the area listed., above is undeveloped (i.e. a density threshold of roughly one structure per five acres of fastland is used for categorizing a coastal barrier as developed) with the exception of: 1) In the south portion of the area, significant development has occurred in the Town of Indian River Shores area (many homes 6 ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: (Continued) 1) and golf course) which would classify this area as "developed". 2) There are 19 houses on 48 acres in Section 33, Township 30S, Range 39E at the north end of the shaded area. Also, numerous site plans have been approved in the area and development is pending or has begun. Further study is also needed to determine the extent of other development. Implications of the designated areas being delineated as Undeveloped Coastal Barriers are as follows: 1) The statue does not prohibit development. 2) As long as a structure qualifies for Federal Flood Insurance as of October 1, 1983, in the event of a flood, the owner may submit one damage claim. After this the structure will no longer be eligible for Federal Flood Insurance. 3) Individuals will be forced to either assume the risks involved or secure flood insurance from other sources. RECOMMENDATION: That the County Commission schedule a public hearing for March 10, 1982, to formally adopt a list of comments to be forwarded to the Interior Depart- ment. This will allow time for further analysis by the staff and public input in the process. On Motion by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved scheduling of a public hearing for March 10, 1982 as recommended. D. Resolution 82-31 - Participation in "Sa've Our Coast" Program On Motion by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 82-31. 7 FEB 171982 L_ BOOK 4 PNCE 836 FEB 171982 BOOK 48 P E 837 RESOLUTION NO. 82- 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDICATING THE COUNTY'S INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE COST OF ACQUIRING COASTAL PROPERTIES WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA UNDER THE "SAVE OUR COAST" PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the Governor and Cabinet of the State of Florida approved a procedure for selecting and acquiring desirable coastal properties as part of a new "Save our Coast" program, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County previously submitted proposals for participation in the program, and WHEREAS, the Commission after reviewing the program finds and determines that it is a necessary and beneficial program and participation by the County in the program is in the best interests of the citizens of Indian River County in preserving a limited natural resource for the enjoyment of current residents as well as future generations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COiMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY that; A. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County intends to participate financially with the State of Florida in the acquisition of desirable coastal properties. B. The County will favorably consider acceptance of the development and"management responsibility for any land acquired under the project. C. The County Commission urges the State of Florida Department of Natural Resources, the Governor and Cabinet to favorably review the County's proposal for participation in the program. Wodtke The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lyons and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Vice -Chairman A. Grover Fletcher Commissioner Patrick B. Lyons Commissioner William C. Wodtke, Jr. Commissioner Dick Bird Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this Attest: jb-P1 (./44.a e - Freda Wright Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGPL SUFFICIENCY By RANDEiNBRG ty Attorn 17th day of February , 1982. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN. RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By DON C. SC.U' Ls CK, JR. Chairman E. Approval of Chairman's signature for Deputy On Motion by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved the Chairman's signature for the following Deputy appointed by Sheriff Dobeck: Randall L. Goodyear. F. Reports Received and Filed in the Office of the Clerk The following reports were received and filed in the Office of the Clerk: Annual Financial Report of Fellsmere Water Control District (in Finance Office) Traffic Violation Bureau - Special Trust Fund Month of January, 1982 - $32_,160.75 Traffic Violation Fines by Name January, 1982 RESOLUTION 82-32 - HONORING DR. FLOOD On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 82-32 honoring Dr. C.C.Flood for his 25 years of service as a Health Director. 9 E E B 171982 48 -838 • 410. 440 IOW 1 , , , , 1 00 $$ 1 6 1 1 6 6 1 6 1 79 oe i 1 1 1 1 6$ 1 6 6 6 .6 / 6 OARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE S OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. 82-32 WHEREAS, on February 23, 1957, DR. C.C. FLOOD began his career with the State Board of Health, Jacksonville, Florida; he moved on to serve as Assistant County, Health Director, Gainesville, Florida in 1958 and in 1959 began as County Health Director serving Indian River County and Osceola County; on July 1, 1971 he became the full time County Health Director for Indian River County,,Florida; and WHEREAS, DR. C.C. FLOOD on February 23, 1982 will mark his 25th year of serving as a Health Director. for the State of Florida and Indian River County; and WHEREAS, DR. C.C. FLOOD has worked to bring about general improvements in the area of health through education, increased number of clinics, and the requirement of immunization; and WHEREAS, DR. C.C.. FLOOD has been instrumental in developing numerous health care programs, some of those being: Tuberculosis Clinic Family Planning Clinic Diabetic Clinic: Safe Drinking Water Program; and WHEREAS, DR. C.C. FLOOD, during his tenure as County Health Director has served on many local and state organizations, including the Cancer Society, which he served on for 20 years; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida takes this opportunity to honor one of its distinguished citizens while he remains in office and continues to serve our County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That the Board, on behalf of itself and its citizenry, honors DR. C.C. FLOOD for his twenty-five years of dedicated service as County Health Director; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board wishes DR. C.C. FLOOD continued success in his chosen field of endeavor. 1 �R1v * * * * * * * * * * * *'-'y�:.. 't Said Resolution shall become effective as of the 17th day of February, 1982. , , , , , , , , 1 / 1 616 666 1 l 66 1 6166 1 1 Oft e Chairman,County Commissio e f i , • 40. p AO ASP 4110. -_ 4110. 4110 40. 440 4110 4111 411. 40 410 RESOLUTION 82-33 - STATE AID TO LIBRARIES Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Bird, to adopt Resolution 82-33 authorizing the Chairman to execute an agreement with the Florida State Division of Library Services for the library grant. Commissioner Fletcher reported that he had been approached by a group who wished to know how to obtain this same kind of grant for a library in the North County area. Attorney Brandenburg stated that this particular grant program is based on the local government expending funds and making an in-kind contribution, and the program must be on-going before they are eligible. Commissioner Lyons suggested that the North County join the county library and become a part of the library system, which he believed would provide a stronger situation. He stated that he would like to have permission to work with them towards this end, and the Board had no objection. The Chairman called for the question to adopt Resolution 82-33. It was voted on and carried by a unanimous vote. FEB 171982 11 tr. §Qg 48 PAGE 840; FEB 171982 BOOK' rc84i' RESOLUTION NO. 82- 33 A' RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County applied to the State of Florida Department of State Division of Library Services for a• grant to help administer opera- tion, equalization and establishment of a public library service in Indian River County, and WHEREAS, the State of Florida has authorized the library grant for Indian River County in the amount of $14,179.00 to be paid in quarterly allotments, and WHEREAS, the attached agreement sets forth the under- standings between the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County and the State of Florida regarding the receipt, expenditure and audit review of said funds. NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY that the Chairman is author- ized to execute the attached agreement. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Lyons who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner was as follows: Bird and, upon being put to a vote, the vote Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Vice -Chairman A. Grover Fletcher Commissioner Patrick B. Lyons Commissioner William C. Wodtke, Jr. Commissioner Dick Bird Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted. this 17th Attest.pL�r,,���j FREDA WRIGHT, APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGA, ' SUF;IC/I,ENCY GAi:Y BRA:NDENBRJRG County Attornevj day of February , 1982. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By / C DON C. SCU LOCK, JR. Chairman 12 STATE AID TO LIBRARIES Agreement between STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF LIBRARY SERVICES and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY This Agreement, made and entered into this 17th day of February , 1982, by and between the State of Florida, Department of State, Division of Library Services, hereinafter referred to as the DIVISION, and the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the DIVISION is authorized pursuant to Sections 257.17, 257.18, and 257.19, Florida Statutes, to administer operation, equalization, and establishment grants for public library service; and, WHEREAS, funds have been appropriated to the DIVISION under Sections 257.17, 257.18, and 257.19, Florida Statutes; and, WHEREAS, the COUNTY has made application and certified eligibility for receipt of a grant authorized under 257.17, Florida Statutes; and, WHEREAS, the COUNTY has centrally expended for the operation of public library service during the fiscal year ending September 30, 1980, the amount of $ 122,068 , exclusive of federal and state grants; NOW THEREFORE, WITNESSETH THAT the parties hereto mutually agree, in execution of the Agreement, as follows: I The COUNTY agrees to expend grant funds awarded pursuant to this FEB 171982 82 - Al BQOK 48 p„[ FEB 171982ego' 48 -2- Agreement in full compliance with the terms and conditions of Chapter 257, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 1B-2, Florida Administrative Code, relating to free public library service, and to provide access to financial records when an audit review is deemed necessary by the DIVISION. II The DIVISION, for and in consideration of the COUNTY performance hereinunder, awards an operating grant in the amount of fourteen thousand, one hundred and seventy-nine dollars ($ 14,179 ), to be releasedin quarterly allotments, in accordanee with the schedule set forth in ATTACHMENT A. IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties hereto have agreed and executed the Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: George Firestone Secretary of State State of Florida Clerk of the Circ Court Chairman, Board of County Cossioners 14 October 1, 1981 January 1, 1982 April 1, 1982 July 1, 1982 ATTACHMENT A Quarterly Allotments Payments 3,544.75 I$ 3,544.75 $ 7,090 $ 3,544.75 I$ 3,544.75 $ 7,089 The first payment will be made on receipt of the signed contract. The third and fourth quarterly allotments will be processed for payment in April, 1982. DISCUSSION RE CLOSING OF UNEMPLOYMENT OFFICE Administrator Nelson reported that this is a very volatile situation right now; there is an indication that the state and federal government may provide more money for partial funding, and he would like to recommend carrying this item forward to the next meeting. On Motion by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously deferred discussion re closing of the unemployment office until the next regular Board meeting. RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE BOND - LAURELWOOD UNIT 4 The Board reviewed the following memo: 15 FEB 171982Q0K . 48 FWD: X44 FEB 171982 800K 8 P TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: February 10, 1982 FILE: County Commissioners .) 4' FROM7,Tei1 A. Nelson, County Administrator SUBJECT: Request for Release of Performance Bond- Laurelwood Unit 4 • REFERENCES: Robert T. Shutts, Laurel Homes to Neil A. Nelson dated Jan. 14, 1982 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Luarel Builders is requesting release of 30% of the $65,138.05 cash per- formance bond posted in August, 1981 for paving and drainage improvement at Laurelwood Unit 4 Subdivision. The County released 60% of the Bond in October, 1981 ($39,082.83). This request involves releasing $19,541.41 which would leave $6,513.81 (10%) in escrow to cover final discrepancy items. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The County staff inspected the site on February 9, 1982, and the paving and drainage improvements are substantially complete. Minor grassing work remains which would be covered by the $6,513.81 remaining in escrow. The County has also received all required density and bearing value test reports as specified in the County's Subdivision Ordinance. These reports indicate that the work is acceptable. RECO'1ENDATIONS AND FUNDING Since the paving and drainage improvements to Laurelwood Unit 4 are substantially complete, it is recommended that the County release $19,541.41, thereby retaining 10% of the original cash bond for miscellaneous discrepancy items. On Motion by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously accepted the recommendation of the' Administrator and authorized the Finance Office to release $19,541.41 of the Performance Bond for Laurelwood Unit 4. BID #108 - PICKUP TRUCK Administrator Nelson reviewed the following Bid recommendation: 16 TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: December 22, 1981 FILE: SUBJECT: Bid Recommendations - IRC #108 FROM: Neil A. Nelson REFERENCES: County Administrator 1. A public meeting was held at 11:00 A.M.,- December 22, 1981 in the County Administrator's Office, 2345 14th Ave., Vero Beach, F1. This meeting was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal on November 20, 21, 22, 24, 25 & 26, 1981. The purpose of this meeting was to open and record the following bid: IRC #108 - (1) 1982 3/4 Ton Truck Cab & Chassis 2. 15 Bid Proposals were sent out, 6 were received (2 were no bids) Velde Ford Ft. Pierce Dodge Southside Ford Dependable Dodge All bidders met minimum specifications. $10,256.56 9,128.06 10,128.24- 9,892.81 3. The Bid -Committee recommends this bid be awarded`to the low bidder, Ft. Pierce Dodge. There is $16,700.00 budgeted for 2 trucks. The second truck is for a 1/2 Ton pick-up, bid to be opened Jana 5 1982. Account 11102-220-519-66-42 Administrator Nelson reported that for.this particular D-250 Dodge 3/4 ton truck, the standard engine is a 318 V8; the weight is 7,500 lbs.; and the maximum payload is 3,875 lbs. A 6 -cylinder engine is not available on this size truck: The truck will be equipped to perform the necessary field work, and Building Maintenance feels this size truck is required. Motion was made by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, to award Bid #108 for a 3/4 ton Pickup Truck to the low bidder, Fort Pierce Dodge, as recommended. 17 FEB 1 7 1982 BOOK 48 Nc 846 FEB 171982 • 1 BOOK 48 r E 847 Considerable discussion followed as to the need for this heavy a truck or the need for an 8 -cylinder engine just to run back and forth to the Courthouse. Commissioner Bird noted that this truck apparently is intended to be a rolling workshop for the maintenance crew and to enable them to carry the many varieties of tools they need. Administrator Nelson explained that this crew does all the repairs on all our buildings - electrical, plumbing, carpentry, etc., and we are talking about a payload of 2,800 lbs. He pointed out that we have just taken over a new building; we are modernizing the Annex; taking care of the Courthouse and the Jail; and it is organized this way to make it a more efficient operation. Chairman Scurlock questioned whether the overall inventory of vehicles is being utilized in the best way possible. The Administrator emphasized that this was all analyzed and justified at budgettime, at which time they cut back on a number of trucks. He stated that if the Board did not wish to purchase this truck, the Road & Bridge Department could get by, but not as efficiently since all trucks are presently in use and they do not have any surplus. .ss Commissioner Wodtke agreed that we need to be sure we get the maximum use out of what we have, but he felt we can go too far with economy, and we need to give these men a piece of equipment they can depend on and one that can do the job adequately. He pointed out that we have already authorized this truck, and if there is an urgent need now, he would like 'to see this approved as bid. Commissioner Fletcher stated that he personally would prefer to reject the bid and go out for a 6 -cylinder engine to be matched with proper rear end ratio to haul the load anticipated. 18 Commissioner Bird noted that this was pretty well hashed out at budgettime; it is an approved purchase; and he felt we need to show a little faith in our Administrator's judgment that it is cost efficient to have this truck to provide this service. Chairman Scurlock felt he could vote in favor of the Motion if an analysis were done to see if there is a possibility of transferring this truck to another area and using a different one in this area. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried by a 4 to 1 vote, Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. BID #109,110 - LANDFILL COMPACTOR Administrator Nelson reviewed the following memo: TO:The Honorable Members of ®ATE: February 12, 1982 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Neil A. Nelson County Administrator SUBJECT: Bid Recommendations IRC ##109 Landfill Compactor (Cash Purchase) IRC 1/110 Landfill Compactor (Total Cost Bid) REFERENCES: • DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Discussion was held at the January 20, 1982, Commission meeting concerning the above subject items. As you may recall discussion centered around the bid specifications and whether or not they were written to tightly as to exclude a fair amount of competition from other firms which could have provided the desired equipment. According to ,Staff information there are several firms that are capable of providing the required compactor. As you may remember, eleven (11) bid proposals were sent out, ten (10) bidders responded to Bid ;109, however, eight (8) of those were no bids. Eight (8) bidders responded to IRC #110 and seven (7) of those were no bids. Bid IRC ;109 was for a Cash Purchase Price. Based upon that fact, a total of two bids were actually received for Bid ##109. One from Kelly Tractor, which bid a Caterpillar, 816B Landfill Compactor for the cash purchase price of $157,118.00. H.F. Mason Equipment_ Corporation bid the Hyster, E441A Landsaver Compactor at a cash purchase price $118,825.00. For Bid IRC #110, Total Cost Bid, that item was bid by Kelly Tractor and the piece of equipment was a Caterpillar. The Total Cost Bid price for that item was $143,023.00. H.F. Mason Equipment Corporation bid the Hyster Equipment, they are the local representatives for Hyster out of Hialeah, Florida. Since the time of the meeting, the County Staff allowed H. F. Mason Equip- ment Corporation at their request to demonstrate the Hyster Compactor. FEB 1'71982 19 BOOK 48 PCE FEB 17198 BOOK 4 ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Staff met with the local Hyster representatives, in fact Hyster sent their factory representative and a representive of H. F. Mason Equipment Corporation to present the slide presentation viewed by the Staff. As a result of that meeting the County's Staff agreed to work with the Hyster representative in the establishment of a field demonstration of their equipment. The following week Staff scheduled the demonstration at the County Landfill. The H.F. Mason Equipment Corporation failed on two occasions to meet the time requirements that were initially agreed upon regarding the locating of the equipment at the Landfill and on the day of the scheduled test. This obviously caused the Staff concern about the backup capability and the firms committment for meeting the servicing criteria that would be imposed upon them. On Monday of this week, February 8, the demonstration actually was performed. During the demonstration period it became obvious to Staff that the Hyster machine did not live up to expectations nor the committments as expressed by the manufactures representative in terms of perfor- mance. In fact, ;the machine did not adequately compact the land at the Landfill and did become mired in the garbage. On the second demonstration effort the Hyster machine had a malfunction and they had to stop the demonstration because a heat or oil light indicator came on which indicated a malfunction. On the third attempt the°machine again failed to perform and meet the require- ments as established by the County. Thus the County Commission has two alternatives in terms of meeting the needs of the County Landfill operation: A. To approve the award of the bid to Kelly Tractor Incorporated in the amount of $157,118.00, the Cash Purchase Price, or the option of adopting IRC #110, Total Cost Bid, for Caterpillar in the amount of $143,023.00. B. Awarding of Bid ##109 on a Cash Purchase Price basis to H. F. Mason Equipment Corporation for the Hyster Compactor in the amount of $118,825.00. RECOMMENDATIONS AND -FUNDING It is Staffs recommendation that Bid IRC ##109 be rejected and that Bid IRC #110, the Total Cost Bid in the amount of $143,023.00 be awarded to Kelly Tractor Incorporated for the Caterpillar machine. On Motion by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously rejected Bid #110, (Total Cost) and awarded Bid #109, (Cash Purchase) to Kelly Tractor Incorporated for a Caterpillar 4 -Wheel Landfill Compactor, as being the lowest and best bid meeting specifications, in the amount of $157,118.00. BID #117 - 3-53 DIESEL POWER UNIT The $oard reviewed the following recommendation: 20 TO: FRO Board of County Commissioners • Neil A: Nelson County Administrator DATE: January 26, 1982 FILE: SUBJECT: Bid Recommendation - IRC #117 REFERENCES: 1. A public meeting was held at 11:00 A.M., January 26, 1982 in the County Administrator's Office, 1840 25th St., Vero Beach, F1. This meeting was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal on December 29, 30, 31, 1981, January 1, 2, 3, 1982. • 2. The purpose of this meeting was to open and record the follow- ing bids: IRC #117 - One (1) 3-53 Detroit Diesel Power Unit. 7 Bid Proposals sent out, 4 received (1 No Bid) Minton Equipment Co. Coastal Power Corp. Allis - Chalmers Kelly Tractor $7987.00 7499.00 8366.00 No Bid 3. The Bid Committee recommends this bid be awarded to the low bidder, Coastal Power Corp., in the amount of $7499.00. This is $2,218.00 less than the low bidder for the 4-53 Detroit Diesel Power Unit, pre- viously rejected by the Board. Funds to be taken from Acct. #102-214-541-66-49. Administrator Nelson reported that this unit is needed by the Road & Bridge Department to replace the pump at the Oslo borrow pit. It was previously bid for a 4-53 unit, but the people who got the bid said that a 3-53 unit would cost less and perform better; so, this item was rebid. On Motion by Commissioner Bird, seconded by commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously awarded Bid #117 for a 3-53 Diesel Power Unit to Coastal Power Corporation as being the lowest and best bidder meeting specifications, in the amount of $7,499.00. 21 FEB 171982 BOOK 48 p,;;:,850. ,: z85fl FEB 171982 BOK 48 Fh„:851 "WHEELS FOR LIFE" BIKE-A-THON Administrator Nelson reviewed the following memo, informing the Board that his staff has checked this and do not believe it will impact traffic. TO:The Honorable Members of DATE: February 10, 1982 • FILE: the Board of County Commissioners FROM:PL/I A. u eil A. Nelson County Administrator SUBJECT: Traffic Control for Requested Bike-A-Thon REFERENCES: ... Ir DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County received a request from Ms. Betty Huber of the Atlantic Christian Academy in Wabasso, inquiring about the feasibility of closing CR5A (Old Dixie Highway) from N. Winter Beach Road to 86th Street for the purpose of holding a Bike-A-Thon on March 27, 1982. The proceeds of the event are to be donated to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS A. Approve the request for the Bike-A-Thon. Traffic volume on CR5A in the subject vicinity is relatively low (estimated at 1500 vehicles per day). The County can furnish necessary traffic control devices to protect bicyclists on the requested course during Bike-A-Thon hours. Alternate access to proper- ties abutting CR5A is available via SR 5, thus minimizing inconvenience to local residents. B. The applicants request for closing CR5A can be denied. RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve of the request for the Bike-A-Thon and that Staff personnel take appropriate action regarding this request. 22 Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Bird, to approve Recommendation A of the Administrator's memo dated February 10, 1982. Commissioner Wodtke inquired about the hours the road will be blocked and whether this would block off access from U.S.1 to Hobart Park. It was noted that traffic will be directed. Discussion followed re ensuring that adequate traffic controls are provided, as well as proper insurance. Commissioners Fletcher and Bird reworded their Motion to approve Recommendation A with the provision that adequate traffic controls will be provided as well as proper insurance. Commissioner Wodtke suggested this activity should be coordinated with the supervisor of Hobart Park. Discussion resumed as to a time frame, and the Administrator noted that this was not specified. Attorney Brandenburg believed the cost of one day insurance may be more than the organization could bear, and stated he would like to talk with the Safety Director and check on our insurance. The Chairman called for the question on the Motion as reworded. It was voted on and carried unanimously. RECOMMENDATION RE OLD WELFARE & VETERANS SERVICE OFFICE BUILDING The Board considered the recommendations in the following memo: 23 FEB 171982 SOUK 48 Pa' 2 F F B 171982 lox 48 F, E 853 TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: February 11, 1982 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners FROMJ(' Neil A. Nelson County Administrator SUBJECT: Disposition and future use of the Welfare Services and Veterans Services Building, located at 14th Avenue and 25th Street in Vero Beach REFERENCES: DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County Welfare Department and the Veterans Service Office has been relocated to the Administration Building. In recent times Staff has received requests from the Salvation Army and the Disabled Amevican Veterans Organization. These groups desire to utilize the building located at 14th Avenue and 25th Street. This building is of frame construction and contains approximately 2300 square feet of usable space. These groups have expressed a desire to lease the building at a nominal rate. At the present time, Staff does not envision need for this building, it is therefore available as surplus property. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS A. The County Commission could determine that there no longer exists a public need for the property. Thus the building could be declared surplus and in excess of County need. Under this approach it would be appropriate to; 1. Obtain a proposal in order to determine fair market value for the property. 2. Staff would prepare specifications and a legal advertise- ment inviting public interest regarding the disposition of the building under either a lease or purchase agreement. 3. Upon receipt of proposals from interested citizens it would be necessary for staff to evaluate the proposals and make recommendations to the Commission in order to determine the final disposition regarding the property. As a part of the decision-making process, consideration could be given to such issues as the appropriateness of a short or long term lease as well as the possibility of outright sale of the property. B. The Commission could determine that it is in the public interest to retain ownership of the building. We could therefore utilize it for overflow space for future expansion of County Staff and/or storage as the situation dictates. C. The Commission could decide to lease or sell the building to a public service type organization. Under this approach the Commission could appropriately lease the building space at a very nominal rate such as a $1.00 per year, and dictate as part of the agreement that these groups must continue in their effort to serve the needs of the community as well as address issues involving facility maintenance and the like. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING It is recommended that the County Commission accept Alternative A and authorize the County Staff to proceed accordingly. 24 Administrator Nelson reported that this building, which is in an excellent location but in need of repair, is still being utilized in part by the Salvation Army. Chairman Scurlock commented that the memo recommends acceptance of Alternative A, or declaring this building surplus. He had strong doubts as to the advantage of getting rid of any county property and believed a long term lease situation would be more acceptable. Commissioner Lyons agreed. Commissioner Bird hada problem with a long term lease because the County's needs change from year to year. Chairman Scurlock wished to know if we are required to advertise this space or whether we can determine there is a need that we want to address and just lease it? Attorney Brandenburg stated that if the Commission decides they do not want to sell, but wish to enter into a lease with an agency that serves the community's interest, they can negotiate with them. Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, that the Administrator make a determination of the interest in the building by agencies such as the Salvation Army, the Disabled American Veterans, etc., and report back to the Board as to their capability in regard to monies and maintenance and their -lease desires, or, in other words, begin negotiation with interested parties for lease on a short term basis. Attorney Brandenburg emphasized that if the Board is going 'into negotiations without advertising, it has to be with a not-for-profit organization that supports the community welfare. Commissioner Wodtke felt some priority should be given to those who have been utilizing the building in the past. Jerry Cook, Veterans Service Officer, came before the Board representing DAV Post #34, and stressed that this FEB 171982 25 to 48 P E 854 FEB 171982 Bary 48 P cE bid' organization is very hampered and its membership severely affected because of the lack of a Post Home. He introduced the Commander of DAV Post #34, Robert "Skip" Clark. Commander Clark reported that he has been authorized by the Post to accomplish one or more of the following actions: 1) Offer a lease agreement for a period up to 99 years 2) offer a lease with an option to buy with all rental lease payments to be considered part of the purchase price, based on a fair market value; or 3) offer a purchase at fair market value for the property previously serving County Welfare and the Veterans Office. Commander Clark also emphasized their long standing desire for a Post home. He informed the Board they have over 200 members, all citizens and taxpayers, some in wheelchairs, some with wooden legs, and some with none, and it is their sincere belief that to grant them one of the options presented would be in keeping with maintaining the community service this Board is noted for. Commander Clark saw no need for advertising and no need to choose between two organizations and pointed out to the Board that the DAV keeps all their money in this county, which the Salvation Army does not. The possibility of their sharing this building with the Salvation Army was raised, but Mr. Clark noted that if the building under discussion were cut in half, they would have less space than they 'presently utilize in the American Legion facility. Further questions arose as to consumption of alcoholic beverages on County and also as to whether the configuration of this building would be suitable for the DAV's purposes. Veterans Service Officer Cook stated that the consumption of alcoholic beverages would not present a' problem because the VFW is right across the street. He 26 noted that one reason they would like a long term lease is that they plan to expend many manpower hours on rehabili- tating this building, and simply by tearing out the temporary room dividers, he believed it could be ideally adapted for an open meeting hall -kitchen -lounge type activity facility that would hold 200-300 people. Chairman Scurlock felt any lease arrangement necessarily must be short term because we need the option to convert to suit the best needs of the county, and he foresaw that the county will have -a use for this facility in the future. He pointed out that there are a number of meeting places in this county, such as the Community Center, where many local organizations hold their meetings. Commissioner Wodtke envisioned a short term lease being for 5 years with a 5 year option and 1 year notice, but pointed out that if we should get a number of programs back from the state to handle on a local level, we have no idea what our demands will be for personnel, space, etc. He stated he would like to help the DAV find a permanent home for a lodge, but noted that we also need to find a place for the Salvation Army, and he hoped we could find some alternatives. Commissioner Fletcher also identified with the DAV's desire for a Post home and believed they deserve it, but he questioned if this is an appropriate location. He brought up the possibility of looking into what other properties the County may have. He also wondered where the Salvation Army would 'go . Mr. Cook stated that since County Welfare Director Janice Lindsey has given up working for the Salvation Army as an unpaid director, there is no one there who can even sign a check, and all that remains is a center for distributing used clothing, which utilizes only a room and a half of the building. 27 BOOK 48 PA1,E856 FEB 171982 FEB 171982 oK 48 P E 857 Some discussion ensued as to the possibility of moving the building, but it was not felt this would be economically feasible. Mr. Hooper, chairman of the Salvation Army, wished to clear up some misconceptions. He informed the Board that the Salvation Army has no objection to the DAV taking the whole building. The Salvation Army is only in a position to rent one room of a small size, and could not rent the building at a competitive rent. Mr. Hooper agreed that their functions have been limited in the past month because they did not know where they are going to be permanently located and they are having trouble getting a permanent welfare worker, but stated that he is authorized to sign checks. He reported that last year they handled $6,000 in welfare cases which the county did not feel were legitimate; they bought prescriptions, bus tickets for emergencies, supplied clothing for burned -out people, etc. Mr. Hooper noted that anyone who wants to can make a designated gift to Indian River County, and it will stay here; in addition, the 70% which does leave the county is not lost to the county since it does come back when emergencies arise. Mr. Hooper informed the Board that they just want a small space where they can keep a welfare worker or a series of volunteers; an office space of 10 x 10 and probably twice that size for storage would be sufficient. It was noted that' the room in the County Administra- tion Building beside the present Welfare Office fits that description almost exactly, and there are racks in there to hang clothes. The Administrator explained that that space was designedforthat purpose - the only problem is that he would have to have authorization from the Board to give this space to the Salvation Army without any rent. The Attorney has said the Board could waive the rent, and then the 28 Salvation Army could again work in cooperation with Welfare. A further problem is that County Welfare Director Janice Lindsey was working in cooperation with the Salvation Army as an unpaid director, but she was working on county time; her time must go to County Welfare and not the Salvation Army, and that is why the division was made. Commissioner Wodtke felt we should look at this space as a possibility and find out what rent the Salvation Army could pay. Discussion continued as to the DAV using the Welfare Building, and Veterans Officer Cook felt that with the use of this building, they probably could treble their membership. He pointed out that in the American Legion, they have to share quarters with an open bar, a poolroom, etc., and it is almost impossible to hold a formal meeting. He further noted that while many organizations in our county are content to conduct their business at luncheon meetings in different locations, the DAV functions require a lodge home. Further discussion ensued as to how organizations such as the VFW and American Legion have constructed their lodges, and Commissioner Wodtke asked if a short term lease of the building would be helpful to the DAV Iso they could do some minimum repairs and maintain it, and in the meantime become more strongly organized, and raise funds to build their own lodge. Mr. Cook believed that such an arrangement would give them a start so that within 8 years they could raise enough money to go out and buy a $100,000 building. Commissioner Fletcher's Motion in regard to authorizing the Administrator to make a determination of interest in the building by agencies such as the Salvation Army and the DAV and to begin negotiations for a lease on a short term basis was read aloud. 29 FEB 171982 ®OK 48 PHC� FEB 171982 Box. 48 P ,cc 859 The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried unanimously. OPEN HOUSE AT NEW ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Adminstrator Nelson reported that he had talked to Tax Collector Gene Morris, Supervisor of Elections Rosemary Richey, Clerk Freda Wright, and the School Board in regard to a date for holding Open House. It appears that Sunday, March 14th, from 2:00 to 4:00 is an appropriate time. The Administrator explained that only representatives from each department would have to be present, and no overtime is involved. If the Board had no objections, he wished to organize the Open House based on this date. The Board had no objection. .,s PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 82-4 - SETBACK ON ROUTE 60 The hour of 10:00 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to -wit: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: - STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being ll in the matter ofd;." f2,4 C A LC.LX, 4.0 in the Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues o j.1ti-. /6, )9i2) Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me th• (ino ;SEAL) er County, Florida) 30 NOTICE NOTICE I5 HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, will hold a public hearing on February 17, 1982, at 10:00 A.M. in the County Commission Chambers in the Indian River County Administration Building, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, to consider the adoption of an Ordinance relating the setbacks on each side of State Road 60 from the west boundary of the Main Canal to Interstate 95 Interchange: providing for building construction setbacks of at least seventy-five feet (75') from the right- of-way line of State Road 60; providing for penalties; and providing for and effective date. If any person decides to appeal any decision made on the above matter, he will need a record of the proceedings, and for such pur- poses, he may need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony in evidence on which the appeal is based. Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida By: Doug Scurlock Jr., Chairman Jan. 28, Feb. 10, 1982. The Board reviewed the Administrator's memo: TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: February 10, 1982 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners FROM: /// Neil A. Nelson County Administrator SUBJECT: Highway 60 Set -Back Ordinance. REFERENCES: DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Highway 60 is a major east/west arterial roadway extending from the eartern portion of Indian River County and extending west- ward to the Gulf of Mexico. The four lane roadway has sparsely scattered commerical businesses service stations, hotels., mobile home parks, citrus groves and the like. Ordinance #72-3 provided for a 75 foot set -back re- striction including both sides of highway 60. Historically these ordinances have been adopted for a one year period. The Planning and Zoning Department as a part of this memorandum is requesting that the County Commission adopt an ordinance which will establish a permanent 75 foot set -back on both sides of highway 60. The proposed ordinance is appropriate for your consideration and has been duly advertised in the Press Journal on January 28, 1982 and again on February 10, 1982. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS A. Affirmative vote by this Board to adopt the ordinance will ensure; 1. That the health, safety and welfare of the residents of Indian River County and those traveling along this thoroughfare will be addressed. 2. It will protect the County tax payers from future expense for condemnation brought about due to having to remove expensive structures in order to establish an appropriate service road along the highway 60 corridor. It will provide necessary land for a future service road if and when one is needed to address the traffic flow in this particular area. By adopting this ordinance on a permanent basis it will necessitate the Board only having 31 FEB 171982 ON 860 FEB 171982 LOOK . 48 PhuE 86i to address the issue once and that would be at this point in time rather than once per year as has been the case in the past. B. Not to adopt this ordinance would jepordize the health, safety and welfare of the residents of Indian River County and those visitors traveling within the Indian River County Community. It would also necessitate aquisition of right-of-way for a service road on both sides of State Highway 60 at a future date thus causing a very significant cost burden ori the County and its residents. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the ordinance and authorize Staff to take appropriate action. Attorney Brandenburg reported that this ordinance replaces one that has been on the books for some time and it reinstates the setback with only some minor changes, i.e., lv ari noances shall be granted, and, rather than expiring yearly, the ordinance will continue in effect until the Board modifies it or goes with some other thoroughfare plan. He did not feel this would present any more legal hurdles than the way it was set up in the past. The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. Herschel Auxier, owner of property on Route 60, which has been all subdivided and sold except for the front area, expressed concern as to how this will affect the use of his remaining property. He noted there is a large ditch on the south side of Route 60, and if you take away 75', that will include that ditch. Zoning Director Dewey Walker felt that the ditch will probably serve as a median strip between the service road that is supposed to go in there and the main highway, and it was further explained that the 75' is merely a setback for building construction, and it can be used for parking, landscaping, signs, etc.,- small items that can be removed. Commissioner Wodtke confirmed that the right-of-way line is south of the ditch and assured Mr. Auxier that the 32 county is not taking land away from him; the intent of the setback is to keep this a nice locking area. William Koolage of 26th Avenue spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance. He felt it is necessary to look ahead and anticipate the need for access roads, parallel roads, and more landscaping, etc., to keep Route 60 from becoming another U.S.1. On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously closed the public hearing. - On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 82-4 establishing a 75' setback on a portion of Route 60. 33 FEB 171982 8®OK 4 Pi; ",,E 862 FEB 171982 ?OK 4 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 82-4 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO SET BACKS ON EACH SIDE OF STATE ROAD 60 FROM THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE MAIN CANAL TO INTERSTATE 95 INTERCHANGE: PROVIDING FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SET BACKS OF AT LEAST SEVENTY- FIVE (75') FEET FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 60; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES: AND PRO- VIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. PA:; 863 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County recognizes that the opening of Interstate 95 into St. Lucie County will tend to attract a corridor of auto -oriented enterprises along State Road 60 and this movement should be carefully regulated in order to protect the locality's main traffic accessway to Interstate 95 to insure sound stabilized economic growth; and WHEREAS, Indian River County is attempting to comply with the State Comprehensive Land Use Statutes for the purposes of insuring orderly development within Indian River County; and WHEREAS, a rapid development of property on either side of State Road 60 would frustrate the purposes of orderly planned growth within the County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, That: Section 1. There is hereby established a seventy-five (75') foot building construction set back on all real property fronting on State Road 60 from the West boundary line of the Main Canal to the Interstate 95 Interchange. The required set back shall be measured from the road right of way line. The Board of Adjustments shall not have the authority to grant variances from this Ordinance. Section 2. Anyone who violates this Ordinance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine not exceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00)' or by imprisonment in the County Jail not exceeding sixty (60) days or by both fine and imprisonment. Each day in violation shall constitute a separate offence. The Board of County Commissioners may bring suit to restrain, enjoin or otherwise prevent violation of this Ordinance in the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by law. A11 ordinances in conflict with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Approved and adopted by the Board -of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida on this 17th day of February , 1982. INDIAN RIVER.COUNTY BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DON C. SCURLOCK, Chairman Acknowledgement by the Department of State of the State of Florida this day of , 1982. Effective Date: Acknowledgement from the Department of State received this day of , 1982, at A.M./P.M. and filed in the office of Clerk of Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida. Approved_as to form .n legal s, fici-ncy By: RY . BRANDEN URG ou 'ty Atto PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 82-5 - TRANSIENT MERCHANTS The hour of 11:00 A.M. having passed, the Deputy Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to -wit: 35 FEB 171982 BOOK 48. PACE 864 FEB 171982 VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Weekly Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being in the matter of (44ea. iC L ej.44,(2.„Lgta, in the Court, was pub - fished in said newspaper in the issues o 6i Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver- tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver- tisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me t SEAL) AD r�r� (Buses >f°vlanager) / / i� (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian R. County, Florida) ar P4s,E865 NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, will hold a public hearing on February 17, 1982, at 11:00 A.M., in the County Commission Chambers in the Indian River County Administration Building, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, to consider the adoption of an Ordinance regulating transient merchants: providing definitions, providing for licensing requirements; providing for licensing fees; providing for enforcement; providing a savings clause and an effective date. If any person decides to appeal any decision made on the above matter, he will need a record of the proceedings, and for such pur- poses, he may need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony in evidence on which appeal is based. Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida By: Doug Scurlock Jr., Chairman Jan. 28, Feb. 10, 1982. The Board reviewed the following memo recommending adoption of the proposed ordinance: TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: February 10, 1982 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners FROM. it/, // eil.A. Nelson /'County Administrator SUBJECT: Transient _Merchant Ordinance REFERENCES: DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On July 14, 1981, Lawrence A. Barkett representing the Vero Beach, Indian River County Chamber of Commerce submitted correspondence requesting that the Board consider adopting an ordinance preventing truck type sales of food and other merchandise in the County. Since that time the County Staff, to include members of the County's Legal Staff,have worked very closely with Mr. Barkett and other members of the Chamber of Commerce in an effort to reach_a mutually sat- isfactory ordinance dealing with this particular problem. The matter has been discussed on several occasions to include recent County Commission meetings wherein it was determined that the initially proposed ordinance needed revision. Staff has worked toward that end and believes that the proposed ordinance presented for your consideration reflects the necessary changes as had been earlier indicated. The proposed ordinance has been duly advertised in the Press Journal on January 28, 1982 and again on February 10, 1982 and is appropriate for your consideration. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS A. Affirmative vote by the Commission to adopt a Transient Merchant Ordinance will accomplish the following purposes: 1 It will require merchants to obtain a local or county license in order to operate. It will control location of transient merchant activities and indicate specific areas that are properly zoned in which this type of activity may be con- ducted. It will provide a fee structure for the obtaining of an occupational license to conduct oneself as a transient merchant thus providing for the sharing in the tax burden by the transient merchant. It will also establish through the zoning process better control of traffic and over- all locational issues involving the activity. B. Not to adopt the Transient Merchant Ordinance will allow for the continuation of present conditions wherein the County's Staff as well as the Chamber of Commerce receives numerous complaints from residents involving problems associated with the purchase of goods and/or services from transient merchants. In addition to that there are also traffic hazards and additional items of which Staff and/or the Chamber of Commerce is made aware of dealing with this particular issue. RECOMMENDATIONS It is Staffs recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the ordinance as a necessary, vehicle in order to address the issues involving the regulation of transient merchants. 37 FEB 171982 sax FA E 866 FEB 171982 am 4 8 PA.;E Attorney Brandenburg informed the Board that there is a typographical error on the bottom line of page 1 of the proposed ordinance, and B) should read "Any person who sells his or her own property which was not acquired for resale, barter 11 Discussion arose as to allowing any display or sale of merchandise within the County right-of-way and the possible liability that could result from such activity. Attorney Brandenburg stated that the Commission can prohibit this from taking place in the right-of-way. Commissioner Lyons discussed Page 1, Section 1, Paragraph 1, which is the definition of Transient Merchant, and brought up the question of the ice cream wagon vendor, whose business necessarily takes place in the right-of-way. Commissioner Wodtke felt such merchants really are operating on a permanent basis of vending to construction sites and up and down streets, etc. In addition, they are licensed by the Health Department. Zoning Director Walker commented that the intent of the ordinance is to regulate areas where transients may locate, and an ice cream truck is a moving object, which would be licensed differently than a transient merchant who sets up along side of the road. Commissioner Fletcher wished to know what would be required of individuals to validate the zoning of the property which they intend to use, and Mr. Walker stated they will have to supply a legal description of where they set up, a deed, permission from the owner, etc., which they probably can obtain from the Recording Department in the Courthouse. The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. Attorney Lawrence Barkett, came before the Board representing the Chamber of Commerce, and informed the Board 38 that the Chamber does recommend passing the proposed ordinance. Georgia Allen of Roseland next took the floor, stating that many people in the North County area would like to see this ordinance made less stringent; they prefer the old American policy of people being able to sell merchandise without a lot of restrictions, and they do not feel "Big Brother" should have to look out for everyone all the time. Mrs. Allen agreed that the problem with the use of the right-of-way is a legitimate one, but felt if the license fee is made too high, it will discourage the small people. She further noted that the requirement to provide a deed can be involved and difficult. Mrs. Allen -also felt the proposed ordinance would limit competition and noted that the flea markets provide entertainment for the North County citizens, as well as give them an opportunity to buy merchandise at lower prices. Attorney Barkett wished the following responses put on record for the Chamber of Commerce. He emphasized that the Chamber of Commerce is designed to protect the free enterprise system, and the reason for this ordinance is that the transients do have an unfair advantage over local merchants. A local merchant has to set up his business only in specially zoned areas, obtain a license,- pay Sales Tax, and conform to many requirements - the transient does not. The proposed fee is only $15.00 a year, which is very reasonable, and will not impose a hardship. Mr. Barkett stressed that the ordinance is not intended to inhibit free competition, but just to put everyone on an equal basis. Commissioner Fletcher agreed the $15.00 fee seems relatively simple, but felt that supplying a deed, etc., can become very complicated. He noted that because times are hard, people congregate weekly on the corner of Roseland Road to sell varied items, and most of these people would FEB 171982 39 Elm 48 r'.:;[ 888 FEB 171982 9gCK 4 �i PA,;.E ii00 not know where to go to get a deed, etc. Commissioner Fletcher further agreed that people should be kept off the right-of-way, but believed the proposed ordinance is too hard on the individual and could put these folks out of business. He preferred to have the ordinance written so that the Sheriff's Department can make a determination of whether this is a legitimate activity and then give the individual the chance to buy the license on the spot. Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that we must give the Sheriff something he can enforce, and he believed we need to adopt an ordinance that says this activity will take place on a specific type of property and that it must be off the right-of-way. He brought up complaints he has had about the trakfic hazard caused by flea markets. Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that anyone who wants to can have a garage sale in their home, and he asked Commissioner Fletcher what he wanted to change in the ordinance. Commissioner Fletcher believed that an ordinance dealing with the right-of-way hazards would take away 90% of the problem, and he was of the opinion that limiting garage sales to three times a year is a problem. Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that the average person does not have enough items of their own to conduct a sale more than three times a year, and if they are bringing other material in, it should be handled as a commercial operation. Attorney Barkett deported that the Chamber of Commerce has received many complaints of transient merchants. He further noted that when you go to a flea market, 50% of the merchandise you see is new, not used, and this is in direct competition with the local merchants, who are our tax base. He emphasized that everybody in the selling game should be on an equal basis, and if you are going to deregulate, you must include the local merchants. Attorney Barkett felt 40 that $15.00 a year is not an unreasonable hardship on anyone. Commissioner Fletcher stated it is not the fee he objects to, but the bureaucracy that will result. William Koolage, concerned citizen, believed some sort of licensing is needed. He noted that the City of Vero Beach has an ordinance which results in dumping all these transient merchants on the county residents, and he did not see anything in the proposed ordinance that protects the public from such merchants -and gives them some recourse. Commissioner Wodtke agreed that this ordinance does not create the vehicle he would like to see for the protection of the consumer. Attorney Brandenburg believed the intent behind the ordinance does not achieve these things; it is a regulatory ordinance. Further argument ensued in regard to allowing the Sheriff to handle this and make a judgment, and Attorney Brandenburg stated that you cannot legally write an ordinance that will allow the Sheriff to interpret it one way one time and one way another Commissioner Wodtke felt the proposed ordinance does give the Sheriff the option to use his discretion to handle any problems that come up. Mrs. Georgia Allen of Roseland again spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. She did not feel that three times a year is sufficient for people to have garage sales; and felt if someone wants to buy something along the road and take his chances, that is the individuals' problem. Mrs. Allen suggested that possibly transient merchants should be required to give their address plus three local references. Gary Wheeler of 1700 14th Avenue, informed the Board that he is a local businessman, the owner of Tasty -0 Donuts. 41 FEB 171982 BOOK +48 F,' E 870 FEB 171982 t sg '48 F,;'UE 871 7 Mr. Wheeler went into the details of all the procedures he had to go through to open a new business, the monthly inspections required, etc., and stated that although he is against more government, he believed this ordinance is necessary to protect the people and felt that what is being required is minimal. He noted that the ordinance appears to exempt local people who are selling their vegetables, etc., and he did not see why business people who live here should have to go through all these procedures to conduct their business if others come in and are not required to. On Motion by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bird believed it is very difficult to write an ordinance that would encompass everything we have talked about and not hurt a few. He felt we find ourselves in the position where we must protect the majority, and the legitimate business merchants in the county and all the people they employ are definitely the majority. Motion was made by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, to adopt Ordinance 82-5 regulating transient merchants and authorize the Chairman to sign. Commissioner Lyons stated that he would like to have had comment from the Sheriff, and felt that in the future a procedure should be set up whereby we can be sure the Sheriff is fully apptized of any action involving his department so that we can receive his comments. Commissioner Fletcher argued that if an individual gets together with three other neighbors and puts a card table in the vacant lots next door to him, he will be in violation, but the Attorney noted that he would not be unless he did this more than three times in a year; however, if a person did what Commissioner Fletcher has described on a continuing 42 basis, he would be in violation of having a commercial activity on his property. The Chairman called for the question re adoption of Ordinance 82-5. It was voted on and carried by a 4 to 1 vote with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. FEB 171982 43 BOOK 48ic,;ES ry FEB 171982 soox 48 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 82-5 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING TRANSIENT MERCHANTS; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR LICENSING REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING FOR LICENSING FEES; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 873 WHEREAS, the unregulated propagation of transient merchants in Indian River County creates traffic hazards along the roadsides of the County's thoroughfare system, and WHEREAS, the existence of roadside stands in areas of the County where the proper zoning does not exist defeats the intent and purpose of the County's overall zoning and planning efforts, and WHEREAS, it is now the intent of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County to require the licensing of transient merchants and to regulate the areas where such busineAses may be conducted, and WHEREAS, Florida Statutes Sec. 125.01 grants the power to non -charter counties to prepare and enforce comprehensive plans for the development of the County, establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are neceesary for the protection of the public and provide and regulate arterial and other roads. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: Section I. Definitions For the purposes of this Ordinance the following terms shall be given the meanings set forth below; 1. Transient Merchant: Is any person or business entity that engages in the sale of any personal or real property, including but not limited to food products, agricultural products, and merchandise, from vehicles or temporary pavilions on or along public or private, streets or from vacant lots, with the following exceptions; A) any person selling agricultural products from the property upon which he or she grew the produce provided the products are not offered for sale in the road right-of-ways, and B) Any person who sells his or her own property which was not acquired for resale, barter or exchange and does not conduct such sales or acts as a participant by furnishing property for sale in such a manner more than three times during any calendar year (i.e. garage sales, rummage sales, white elephant sales, etc.) when the property is not offered for sale in the road right-of-way. 2. Temporary Pavilion; is any device, structure, tent, grouping of tables, or any other display technique or apparatus that is not a permanent structure built pursuant to a valid Indian River County Building Permit in accordance with all applicable building codes, rules and regulations and the zoning code of Indian River. County. Section II. License Required, Conduct Prohibited a) Conduct Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person or business entity to engage in the business of a transient merchant in Indian River County without having first obtained a Transient Merchant Business License from the Tax Collector of Indian River County, Florida. It shall be unlawful for any transient merchant to conduct business along public or private streets or from vacant lots except as specified on the license required by this Ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any person or business entity to engage in the business of a transient merchant along, in front of or on any property that does not carry a commercial, industrial or agricultural zoning classification under the Zoning Code of Indian River County. b) Application for License. Applications for a license to conduct business as a transient merchant shall be submitted to the Tax Collector and shall contain the following information; A) Name, permanent address and telephone number of applicant/owner. B) Florida Sales Tax number of applicant/owner. C) The exact location where the merchandise will be displayed and sold. D) A letter from the owner of the property from which the merchandise will be displayed and sold granting permission to the transient merchant to conduct business at said location. If the display and sale of the merchandise is anticipated to occur within the County right-of- way a similar letter must be obtained from the abutting property owner. -2- Poor 48 PAOE 874 FEB 171982 FEB 171982 ��qq BOOK . 48 K:;E 875 E) A certificate from the Zoning Department of Indian River County indicating that the area proposed for the display and sale carries a commercial, industrial or agricultural zoning classification. No occupational license will be issued by the Tax Collector without this certificate. Section III. License Fee and Display The License Fee for conducting business as a transient merchant shall be the sum of Fifteen ($15.00) Dollars per year payable in advance. The license shall be displayed in a prominent place at the location where the merchandise is sold. Section IV. Enforcement The Sheriff of Indian River County shall cause sufficient inspections.to occur to insure compliance with the provisions Of this Ordinance. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County may authorize the County Attorney to bring civil proceedings in the Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance. Section V. Penalty Any person or business entity who violates the provision of this Ordinance, upon conviction shall be punished by a fine not to exceed Five. Hundred ($500.00) Dollars or by imprisonment in the County Jail not to exceed sixty (60) days or by both such fine and imprisonment. A separate offense shall be deemed committed for each day the violation continues. Section VI. Severability If any section, sub -section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be declared invalid for any reason whatsoever, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions which shall remain in full force and effect. To this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. Section VII. Repeal of Conflicting Laws Any provision of any ordinance or laws of Indian River County existing on the effective date of this Ordinance, which are in conflict with the provisions contained herein, shall be deemed repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section VIII. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by law. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida on this.7t, day of February, 1982. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: DON C. SCURLOCK, JR. lj Chairman Acknowledgement by the Department of State of the State of Florida this day of , 1982. Effective Date: Acknowledgement from the Department of State received on this day of , 1982, at A.M./P.M. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency. . BRANDE BURG ty Atto RECONSIDER ITEM A OF CONSENT AGENDA RE USE -OF FUNDS FROM SEIZED PROPERTY ACCOUNT BY SHERIFF Attorney Brandenburg reported that since requesting the above item be deferred earlier today, he has had a chance to discuss this with the Sheriff; his concerns have been resolved; and he now does not see any problem with the Board taking action on it as requested in the following memo: FEB 171982 47 B®OK 4 PAGE 876 FEB 171982 aQOK 48 ria877. TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: February 10, 1982 FILE: Board of County Commissioners FR011 Neil A. Nelson County Administrator SUBJECT: Purchase of Equipment - Sheriff's Department REFERENCES: Letter from Sheriff Dobeck - Dated February 2, 1982 We have received a request from Sheriff Dobeck for the purchase of surveillance equipment from Audio Intelligence Devices, Ft. Lauder- dale, in the Amount of $3,070.00. He has requested that these funds be charged to Account No. 112-600-521-99.93. The current balance in this account is $20,257.16. This has been cleared with Jeff Barton, Finance Officer and Gary Brandenburg, County Attorney. It is recommended that approval be given to purchase the equip - ment. On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanirrously approved the purchase of equipment by the Sheriff as requested; the funds to be charged to Account No. 112-600-521099.93. The Board thereupon recessed at 12:00 Noon for lunch and reconvened at 1:30 o'clock P.M. with the same members present. 48 COUNTRY PINES SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL The Board reviewed the memorandum dated January 28, 1982: TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners FROM: Neil Nelson County Adminstrator DAT E: January 28, 1982 FILE: IRC-81-S/D-1 SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Approval for Country Pines Subdivision REFERENCES: Jim L. Peterson to Jim Davis, Director of Public Works, dated Jan. 18, 1982 1. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat Approval to divide 9.96 acres. into 16 lots. The site is located on the north side of South Gifford Road approximately 1/4 mile west of 58th Avenue. The property is presently zoned R-1, single family residential (6 units/acre) and designated LD -1 (up to 3 units/acre) in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The density of the proposed subdivision is approximately 1.6 units/acre. The site is surrounded on all sides by property which is desig- nated LD -1 (up to 3 units/acre) and scattered low density residential development is situated in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision. 2. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS A. Preliminary Plat Approval be granted to Country Pines Subdivision. South Gifford Road is designated as a primary collector in the proposed thoroughfare plan. .This would require 100 feet of right-of-way where 40 feet currently exists. All of this right-of-way would be on the north side of South Gifford Road due to the lateral A-6 canal to the South. The applicant has agreed to dedicate an additional 10 feet of right-of-way and establish a 70 foot building setback line on the two lots which front South Gifford Road. This would allow room for an additional 50 feet of right-of-way to be acquired when needed and any structure would be set back a minimum of 20 feet rrom the additional right-of-way. The developer has also agreed to establish a 45 foot building setback line on the north 3 lots. -This would allow for development of a secondary road system connecting subdivisions when the need arises. All technical Review Committee recommendations have been agreed to by the applicant and the preliminary plat has been amended to reflect these changes. FEB 171982 49 BOK 48 PAc 878 r1 B OK 48 F E 879 FEB 171982 B. Deny the request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Country Pines Subdivision. Selection of this alternative would maintain the existing situation. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Staff recommends Alternative A, Preliminary Plat Approval be granted for Country Pines Subdivision. Harlan L. Peterson, applicant, explained that all ease- ments and rights-of-way would be dedicated. They would dedicate a 10' strip and would establish a 70' building setback line to allow for a 50' right-of-way. He advised that the subdivision had been approved by the Technical Review Committee in January and was now requesting that the Board grant preliminary plat'approval. Dennis Ragsdale, Planner, stated that the property was presently zoned R-1 and designated LD -1 (up to three units per acre) in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Commissioner Bird mentioned that the plat submitted in the packet for the Board to review was of very poor quality. Administrator Nelson noted that a large size plat can be made available in the Commissioners' room in order that the Board can study it in more detail. Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Bird, that the Board recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Country Pines Subdivision, as recommended by the Administrator. Commissioner Fletcher felt that this County should implement the restriction of one acre per lot as they do in Palm Beach County. He could not, and would not support cutting up the County in half acre lots. Commissioner Fletcher would like to see one acre lots and,therefore, would be voting negatively. Attorney Brandenburg stated that in Palm Beach County, a one acre lot in West Palm Beach would cost $100,000. He knew of no such law in Palm Beach County, but commented that they may have changed one of their zoning classifications to reflect a restriction of one acre lots." Commissioner Fletcher stated that he must have meant Palm Bay instead. Administrator Nelson advised that the cost of a half acre lot would be over $20,000 in this County. A debate followed on this issue. Commissioner Wodtke felt that one-half acre lots were a good size. Commissioner Lyons stated if anyone wanted to vote against this request, then the ordinance should be changed. He reminded the Board that this does meet all the ordinance requirements; you are not voting on whether or not you like this subdivision. Chairman Scurlock stated that if the entire Board took the position that they did not like a subdivision and all voted no, it would not be held up in court. Attorney Brandenburg comMented that the only"question at present is if the request meets all of the requirements in the ordinance. Commissioner Lyons interjected that the applicant has come to the Board with his request, and has done everything right. Commissioner Fletcher stated that he would continue to object until he got in trouble with the law. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. FEB 171982 51 MU 48 ria 880 pr - FEB 171982 BOOK 48 .88, WE88, AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 80-13, UTILITIES ORDINANCE The Board reviewed the following memorandums regarding the amendments to Ordinance 80-13: TO: Gary Brandenburg, County Attorney FROM: George Liner, Utilities Director DATE: '.January 13, 1982 FILE: SUBJECT: Amendments to Ordinance 80-13 REFERENCES: The attached proposed amendments are suggested for Ordinance 30-13. To do this we should delete Section 6 and Section 12 and replace those with the attached. These amendments accomplish several things that had been contemplated or were previously in the works. A. Multi -family condo units (ala Vista Royale) will be billed on a rating system that had been approved by the Board of Commissioners, this change to occur after the new water plant provides the service, (approximately November 1982). Before then we shall bill each condo building as calculated by the computer as though it has one unit (with 2000 gallons allowed for the first $7.10). B. There is provision for assessment to developers who reserve plant capacity but dp not build. This is necessary to recover bond funds and preclude developers tying up the plants reserve for an indefinite time. C. Provision is made for a higher security deposit for leased properties. There are usually large turnovers with many customers leaving unpaid bilis. With these larger deposits, the County will be better protected and avoid these problems in the future. D. A correction to this Section 12 had been reviewed with Commissioners, Planning, Engineerina and Board of Health. We believe this version clarifies the section to avoid future misunderstandings for properties with wells and septic tanks on the same property. 52 TO: Gary Brandenburg, County :Attorney FROM: Geartle Liner, Utilities, Director DATE: February 8, 1982 FILE: QJ ! fl �� Proposed Ordinance Amenclrnents to Ordinance #80-13 REFERENCES: I am returning the copy oT annotated version of the proposed ordinance amendment that you had worked up. What you prepared is excellent and will do the job, however, it does not include the matter that we had discussed. That item' is the ability to be able to charge the base rate for any. period of time any existing service has been shut off upon °°" 0 14 request of the resident, or for delinquency. I have shown C$° such coverage (maybe it should be worded better) on page 3. There's one area of information that was suggested by John Lisle for your consideration. We want to charge developers who don't develop in a given.period - for the base -rate. John feels that where we have included a volume of water, along with a base rate, that the courts might not feel this is proper to do. I believe the point can be argued that the base rate includes the cost of doing business and the reservation of the water capacity even though the customer does not use. it, and we do give the customer 2,000 gallons of water to boot for - the same price. If they use the water, fine, if they don't use it, that is their bad luck. ..' Beyond this response is there pre to do in getting this ordinance of Commissioners? GL/kh cc: Neil Nelson Tommy Thomas John Robbins file anything else that you wish amendment before the. Board `,)PSG ',lir Ovv lye 61/0 0.4" 41 (L Attorney Brandenburg stated the amendments would change several sections of the present ordinance. One would be setting a minimum base rate and meter sizing, and another would concern capacity reservation charges. The Attorney added the amendments would also address the differential between the people who rent houses vs homeowners, as the FEB 171982 53 B.QAK 48+ PACE FEB 171982 pAOlf A8 f 6E Utility Department has suggested increasing the deposits for those who are renting. Attorney Brandenburg noted that the deposit procedure has also been clarified, as well as some areas regarding septic tanks. Chairman Scurlock hoped we would be in compliance with the Public Service Commission; that we would be consistent with current thinking, such as addressing the problem of the poor. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the collection problem the Utilities Department has had with the renter customers. The Board discussed various word changes in the proposed ordinance pertaining to the 10 year flood plain, and it was felt this should be referred to as the 100 year flood plain. Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Bird that the Board shall not adopt the policy of the deposit differential between the renter and the home- owner at this time. Utilities Director Liner explained that it was not their intent to generate additional income; it was just to prevent the hassel their department has been encountering. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried unanimously. Commissioner Lyons suggested adding the phrase "of customer's lines" to the text on page five to make the sentence read: "Meter, Re -Reads and Leak Inspection of Customer's Lines - $5.00." Engineer Davis suggested various alternatives relating to the problem of defining the flood plain. On Motion made by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commis- sioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously agreed to strike the last sentence completely on page 7, item 3. Lengthy discussion followed regarding septic tanks. 5 Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher that "one- half acre" be changed to "one acre" on Page 7, Section 12, Item 1. The Motion died for lack of a second. ° Commissioner Bird referred to Page -7, Item 1 and suggested the last sentence be amended to read: "For purposes of this Ordinance, net usable land shall equal the total area of a lot less all streets, swales, and canals located within dedicated rights-of-way or easements and other impairments to the owner's unrestricted use thereof as a building site." Considerable discussion ensued. On Motion made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously authorized the advertisement of a Public Hearing for amendments to Ordinance 80-13. OUT -OF -COUNTY TRAVEL - ATTORNEY BRANDENBURG The Attorney reviewed the following memorandum with the Board: TO: Board of County DATE: February 8, 1982 FILE: Commissioners Neil A. Nelson, County Administrator SUBJECT t• • Eminent Domain - Continuing. Legal Education Seminar FROM: Gary. M. Brandenburg REFERENCES: County Attorney The Florida Bar will hold an Eminent Domain Practice course on March 19 in Jacksonville, Florida. The topic of the course discussion will include: 1. Taking by Regulation, Condemnation Blight and Inverse Condemnation 2. Access 3. Subdivision Exactions, Dedications and Impact Fees 4. Attorney's Fees 5. Probability of Rezoning: The Key to Big Verdicts 6. Proof of Business Damages 7. Post -Trial Proceedings Including Interest and Apportionment 8. Right to Call Opponent's Used Expert Witness at Trial 9. Tax Consequences of Eminent Domain 10. Recent Developments, Cases and Trends FEB 171982 55 BOOK 48 PAGE FEB 171982 ma .4g PA3E. Indian River County is currently involved in some Eminent Domain proceedings and in all likelihood involvement in this area of law will expand in the future. The cost of this seminar is $55.00 plus travel in a County vehicle and one night's lodging. The County Attorney requests travel approval to attend this seminar. Respecfully/submi --ted, Gy, Brandenburj' Attorney Brandenburg discussed procedure regarding out -of -County travel for future requests and the Board recommended they be put on 'the Consent Agenda. On Motion by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commis- sioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved out -of -County travel for the County Attorney to attend the Continuing Legal Education Seminar re Eminent Domain in Jacksonville, Florida on March 19, 1982. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS Motion was made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commissioner Bird, that the Board adopt Resolution 82-34 approving the Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, and the signature of the Chairman. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. _ Resolution 82-34 will be made a part of the Minutes when received. PEBBLE BAY SEWERAGE AREA WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Bird, that the Board adopt Resolution 82-35 approving and authorizing the signature of the Chairman on contract documents for Pebble Bay Sewerage Area Waste- water System Improvements. 56 ..- Discussion followed, and it was determined that this matter should be moved along. The longer the Board waits, the more interim financing would have to be done. Administrator Nelson agreed, and added that trying to sort all of this out had been a long and arduous task; he advised the Board that he would reroute a letter from Engineer John Robbins to the Board relating to this matter. Attorney Brandenburg commenced to explain the procedure which was to adopt a preliminary assessment roll, and then have a public hearing, where the Board would have the ability to modify it if there are any inequities. He added that the funds for this project have already been earmarked. After some discussion, the Board suggested this matter be deferred for a few minutes to have the staff research the account number for these funds. Utilities Director Liner advised the Board that the funds would come from the User Impact Fees,_Account No. 472-199-581-99.21. Commissioner Lyons added Account No. 472-199-581-99.21 to his original Motion. Commissioner Bird amended his second to reflect this addition. A brief discussion followed. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in opposition. Administrator Nelson stated that the assessment roll was completed and would be given to the Attorney for his review, and they could proceed to schedule the hearing. FEB 17198 57 BOOK 48 pr.,3E 886 FEB 171982 DQ�K. , 48 PA:‘,E RESOLUTION NO. 82- 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR THE PEBBLE BAY SEWERAGE AREA WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has determined that certain improvements to the wastewater system in the Pebble Bay Sewerage Area are necessary and in the public's best interest, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners placed the work encompassed in the attached agreement out for bid and thereafter determined that Bain Underground Utilities, Inc was the lowest and best bidder and awarded the contract, and WHEREAS, Sverdrup and Parcel and Associates, Inc. and Beindorf and Associates, Inc., a joint venture, prepared the contract documents and specifications for the Board of County Commissioners of Indian' River County and now recommends the execution of the attached contract, and WHEREAS, the attached contract provides for the work to be performed by Bain Underground Utilities, Inc. for the contract price of $114,578.35. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the foregoing recitals are approved and the Chairman and the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners are authorized to execute four (4) copies of the attached contract. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Lyons who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bird and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Vice -Chairman A. Grover Fletcher Nay Commissioner Patrick B. Lyons Aye Commissioner William C. Wodtke, Jr. Aye Commissioner Dick Bird Aye -1- The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 17th day of February Attest: FREDA WRIGHT, C APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEG '_%SUFF,CI N By BRANDENBJRG Attorn FEB 171982 , 1982. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF IN IAN RIVER CIUNTY, F IDA By -2- DON C. SCJR OCK, JR. Chairman BQVK 48 PAuE 0 do FEB 171982 owir P,jE REINHOLD DRAWDOWN Attorney Brandenburg explained that Reinhold Construction is requesting payment #21 in the amount of $367,205.77 for the work done on the Administration Building, which would allow a retainage of $6,000. He continued that the certifica- tion from the architect was erroneous as it was only a partial release and there were still outstanding balances. The Attorney advised that he met yesterday with Mr. Reinhold and his attorneys and reviewed the whole situation. In an attempt to work out the drawdowns in the contract, they reached proposed agreement with Mr. Reinhold. Attorney Brandenburg commented that the purpose of the agreement is to clearly state that a drawdown of this retainage does notconstitute a waiver; the payment of these funds will not waive any of the County's rights in litigation with the firewalls and painting. He continued that Hercules Kontoulas, Construction Project Representative, indicated there were four releases of lien missing. Administrator Nelson explained that two were unsigned because the subcontractor signed only the last page, and left the front pages unsigned. He added that they were to be picked up to get the proper signatures. Discussion ensued. Attorney Brandenburg stated that under Florida Law, material men and subcontractors cannot place a lien on a public works job. Instead, they must look to performance bonds with any liens. The Attorney's recommendation was to have the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the proposed agreement, upon acknowledgment by the Attorney and the Administrator..that the four unsigned claims have been signed. Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement upon acknowledgment by the Attorney and the Administrator of receipt of the missing and unsigned releases of lien. Attorney Brandenburg commented that $6,000 would remain to be paid on the original contract plus other special items that are agreeable. Lengthy discussion followed about the original contract and bond. The Attorney interjected that the contractor had gotten approval from the bonding company to drawdown $367,205.77. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried unanimously. LFEB 171982 61 EQOK l'" FEB 171982 AGREEMENT 090 48 PA ,891: THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 17th day of February, 1982, by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, Owner (Owner hereinafter), and Reinhold Construction, Inc., Contractor (Contractor hereinafter). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner and Contractor entered into a contract dated April 10, 1980, relating to the Indian River County Administration Building additions and renovations; and WHEREAS, the Architect/Engineer Connell, Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. has signed a Certificate for Payment dated January 29, 1982, providing for -Owner to pay Contractor the sum of $367,205.77; and WHEfEAS, Owner and Contractor are presently in litigation with respect to Contractor's claim for extra payment incident to firewall and. painting on the project in questipn, and each of the parties presently assert claims for money damages against the other which have not yet proceeded to litigation; and WHEREAS, Owner and Contractor desire for Owner to pay Contractor the aforesaid $367,205.77, and Contractor desires to present to Owner affidavits and releases of subcontractors and materialmen concurrent with the receipt of said payment without either party waiving any claims, demands, actions and causes of action of any nature whatsoever which it may now or hereafter have whether arising under and by virtue of the aforesaid contract or otherwise. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed and stipulated by and between Owner and Contractor in consideration for the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged each from the other as follows: 1. Owner agrees to pay Contractor upon future receipt of certificate for payment #21 from architect the sum of $367,205.77, as set forth in that certain certificate dated January 29, 1982, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. Contractor agrees concurrent with payment by owner to deliver to Owner affidavits and releases of subcontractors performing the work and materialmen providing materials reflected by said $367,205.77, and the prior payments under the contract by Owner to Contractor, together with an affidavit by Contractor confirming such payments. 3. Contractor will continue to perform through itself and subcontractors, Behe & Umholtz Electrical Contractor & Grimes Heating & Air Conditioning, additional electrical and air conditioning work on the Administration Building in question pursuant to work orders providing for same to be paid on a cost plus (time and materials) basis as set forth more particularly in said work orders, and in the absence of default by either party, upon completion of said work in accordance with the contract documents, Owner will pay the charges for said work to Contractor who will concurrent therewith provide Owner with affidavits and releases of subcontractors and materialmen performing such work. 4. Owner and Contractor agree that neither party by the making of this Agreement, payment and acceptance of the aforesaid payment, or otherwise, has waived or will waive any claims, demands, actions or causes of action each may have against the other heretofore or hereafter arising out of or by virtue of the aforesaid contract or otherwise, including but not limited to all such claims, demands, actions and causes of action as are set forth in the pleadings and other papers filed in that certain lawsuit entitled The County Commission of Indian River County vs. Reinhold Construction, Inc. and Connell, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Case No. 81-788, in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Indian River County. Further, it is agreed by Owner and Contractor that neither party is by reason of the matters set forth herein or otherwise waiving any claim, demand, action or cause of action it may now or hereafter have against Connell, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. arising by virtue of the aforesaid contract between Owner and Contractor, that certain contract between Owner and Connell, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. pertaining to the above referenced project, or otherwise. 5. The purpose and intent of this Agreement is to confirm and reaffirm between the parties the statement on the face NOK 4.8 Pi E �' 2 FEB 171982 -2- FEB 171982 an 3 ..�0 tiE89c� of the Application and •Certificate for Payment attached hereto that "issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this contract", same being the aforesaid contract between Owner and Contractor dated April 2, 1980. 6. It is agreed by Owner and Contractor that the above payment is not a final payment within the meaning of the contract, including but not limited to Paragraphs 9.9.4 and 9.9.5 of the General Conditions to the contract. 7. It is agreed by Owner and Contractor that with respect to additional monies under the contract not yet paid, that the sum of $1,000.00 shall be designated as the Final Payment under the. contract and not paid until the latter of completion of the cost plus work referenced hereinabove and termination of the lawsuit„referred to in Paragraph 4 hereinabove, it being further understood and agreed that each application for payment prior to the application for such Final Payment shall be a progress payment under the contract, including but not limited to Application for Payment No. 22 in the amount of $16,939.58, which Application on its face refers to the aforesaid sum of $1,000.00 under the heading "Retainage". To the extent, if any, said contract dated April 10, 1980, including the general conditions and other papers and documents incorporated therein and forming a part thereof, is inconsistent with this Agreement or any provision hereof, said contract which is incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein at length is hereby amended by the terms of this Agreement which shall control. 8. In the event the architect/engineer does not approve and return to the owner the aforesaid Certificate for Payment No. 21 within 10 days of February 16, 1982, this Agreement shall be deemed void ab initio, and the parties will be returned to their initial legal positions and rights under the contract in question as if this Agreement had never been executed, including but not limited to Contractor's right to assert that payment has been previously approved and Owner's right to deny same. In such event, neither party may utilize this Agreement in any legal proceeding between the parties, and further, it is understood and agreed by and between Owner and Contractor that this Agreement is not intended to confer any benefit or rights upon any third parties. 9. Neither this Agreement nor any provision herein shall be construed more harshly against the.,party drafting same or for whose benefit same was included herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. In the res witnejes: LFEB 1982 yE Apnrlovet; i;s to form E and leg' `�`iffici 7 M. Brariclenblt my Attorne • c BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. By: Owner c REINHOLD / By: NHOLD, President ontracfor —4— ON, INC. B00K 48 PAH 894 , APPiCCATiON AND CERTC GCATL Fon PAYMENT 40. 9 07 AIA DOCUMENT G702 PAG: ONE OF 32 PAGES TO (Owner): BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1840 25TH STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 ATTENTION: CONNELL, METCALF & EDDY P.Q. BOX 341939 CORAL GABLES, FLORIDA 33134 PROJECT: 8010 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITIONS & RENOVATIONS • CONTRACT FOR: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS 497,907.74 DEDUCTIONS (178.95) Approved this Month 40,800.18 i ... Numbbr Date Approved ADDITIONAL APPROV. TOTALS • 538,707,92 (178.95) Net change by Change Orders 538, 528.97 APPLICATION NO: 21 Distribution to: 0 OWNER 12/10/81 0 ARCHITECT 12/31/81 ❑ CONTRACTOR PERIOD FROM: ; TO: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9363 0 ❑ • CONTRACT DATE: APRIL 2, 1980 Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. ;.The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows: ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM $ 2,748,000.00 Net change by Change Orders $ 538, 528, 97 CONTRACT SUM TO DATE $ 3,286,528,97 TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE$ 3,286,528.97 (Column G on G703) ETAINAGE •o • as• 0- ii a . The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for • • Payment has been completed 'in accordance with the Contract Docu ment., previous C from th I amounts have been paid by him for Work for which cates for Payment were issued and payments received wner, and that current paymen shown herein is now due. CON CTOR: REINHOLD, INC By: cu or total in Column I on G703• t `z TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE r' —3;281;528.97— —15,000.00: $ Lq, 12/30/81 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site obser- vations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the. Owner that the Work has progressed to the point indicated; that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Docu- ments; and that the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. •• LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT 2,879,975.08 LESS PAYMENTIN PROGRESS' -33,348:12_ CURRENT PAYMENT DUE $ :368,205 .77 State of: FLORIDA Subscribed and sworn to Notary Public: My Commission exp me this ubl� iat--ef-EloridA rrt Incr. County of: BREVARD f DEC. ,19 *AMOUNT CERTIFIED My ommission Expires May 3,19V, •(Attach explanation if amount cer BfreaddiPfersr°from the amount applied tor.) ARCHITE r y �+ By: L) ' Date: 1 Gq e'�7 This Certifica a is not nI.tiab The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payabl only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCUMENT G702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA` • © 1978 THE AMrRICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS. 1735 'NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.;' WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006'; • CON a NUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G702A AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing CONTRACTOR'S signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. PAGE 2 APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 OF 32 CZI.s ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 933 ITEM No. A DESCRIPTION OF WORK GENERAL & E (TERIOR SCHEDULED VALUE C WORK COMPLETED TOTAL COMPLETED STORED TO DATE G(D-FE+F) AND 4 CALANCE RETAINAGEAG TO FINISH ' H(C-G) I 1 .., Previous Applications This , Application STORED MATERIALS F To 1-2 MOBILIZATION 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 100 6,000 80 002; 026 IRRIGATION 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 _ X5.00 002 027 CONC. f•1IX - SUBMITTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00 100 10.00 002 028 BAR LITS. - SUBMITTAL 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 25.00 002 029 MISC. METALS 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 1 25.00 002 030 0112• 031 MILL':ORK 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 ) I 25.00 PAINTING & CAULKING 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 ± 25.00 002 032 HX I:0RK i 250.00 250.00 250.00.100 25.00 002 033 '.!000 DOORS • 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 25.00 002 034 ALUM. S/F &GLASS 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 25.00 002 035 D/t'J SYSTEM 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 25.00 002 036 CERAMIC TILE 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 4 25.00 002 037 ACOUSTICAL SYSTEM 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 25.00 002 038 FLOOR COVERINGS 250:00 250.00 250.00 100 25.00 002 039 CAULK & TACK BDS. 100.00 100.00 100.00 100 10.00 002 040 TOILET PARTITIONIS 250.00 250.)Q 250.00 100 i 25.00 PAGE TOTAL 63,450.00 63,450.00 ! 6,345.00 SUB TOTAL OR TOTAL 63,450.00 63,450.00 63,450.00 6,345.00 AIA DOfU."."ENT G702A o CONTINUATION SHEET o MARCH 1971 EDITION e AIAO+ o 0 1971 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 CerttrsUAiiON SHUT T AIA DOCUMENT G703 32 AIA Document G702,,\I'PIJCATIQN ANI) CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's si ned Certification ts'attached. In tabulations below. amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable :; tainage for Zine items may apply. APPLICATION NU".ti3LR 2.1 APPLICATIC)N 1)ATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD 1RO.M: 11/31/81 12/31/8:] ARCHI1LC1'S PKO:ECT :O: ,3 A . a-- C D E F• G ! 11 I ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK SFEX SCHEDUI.ED VALUE -1-(.)'.!i411LD •WORK •-r)FAt. ( )M'IFTF.0 AND STORED 10 DATE tD+E+F) ^, IG- C, . t:^i'•' TU I I`;<Fi (' (' {nA,i f revious Applications _ `a . Application Work in race r Stored M or E _ , tnotin Dorf• • 042 041 ACCESSIBLE FLOOR 250.00 250.00 . - 250.00 100 25.00 002 .._ i. . t 042 FLAG POLE •- a .100.00 • 100.00 • . . 4 100.00 , 100 i 10.00 002 043 SIGUAGE 200.00 200.00 - ! 200.00 100 20.00 002 I 044 TOILET'ACCESSOR.I'ES 100.00 100.00 1 100.00 100 ` 10.00 0Q2 • , 045 SEATING 250.00 250.00 250.00 100 25.00 002 045• FUMING'. ` - . a 500.00' 500.00 500.00 100 50.00 ' 002 047 H V A C. i 500.00. 500.00 I' 500.00 100 • 50.00 002 1 ; 048 ELECTRICAL - • • 500:00}' - . 500.00 500.00 100 : . • 50.00 ! 002 CLEAR & GRADE EAST- 100 OF 18TH 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100 , 400.00 002 _ 111. EXT". DEMOLITION :10,000.00.- 1:0,000..00 ; 10,000.00 100 ' t 1,000.00 r f f 1 ! f -GE TOTAL ' 16,400.00 16,400.00 16,400.00 1 1,640.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL i 79,850.00, 5 79 8�O.OQ 79,850.00 1 I 7,925.00 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHE:T • APRI1. 1978 EDITION • AIA • © 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTI1UTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 I.EW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 0703 --1973 CONT[NUATIO 1 SNEEIT AIA DOCUMENT C703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. rnc. (F 32 • PAG[, APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 12/30/81 CO PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 • TO: AR• 12,/3 /81 CITECT'S PROJECT NO• 36 H AIA DOCUI.:�NT Gr03 CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA • O 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 —1973 LI— !�1 • R,c A 8 C D E F I G H I ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED TOTAL No. VALUE ; COMPLETED This Application AND STORED °,' BALANCE RETAINAGE Previous Applications Work in Place Stored Materials ` TO DATE (not in D or E) (D+E+F) (G±C) TO FINISH (C—GI o ROOF &FACIA jF f 050 064 NEW OPENINGS HI ROOFS 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 50.0C 051 065 WEST NEU OPENINGS LO ROOF 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 50.00 052 065 PREP FOR ANTENNA 2ND LEVEL . 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 50.00 053 057 REMOVAL LO' ROOF EAST 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 054 059 NEW OPENINGS LO ROOF EAST 1,000.00 1,000.00 • 1,000.00 100 100.00 055 068 REt10'JE LO ROOF WEST 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 100 150.00 056 070 REMOVE P' HOUSE WEST WING 2,500.00 2,500.00 ; 2,500.00 .. 100 250.00 057 071 NEW OPENINGS WEST WING ' 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 T 50.00 058 072 tj . REMOVE C TOWER, ETC. 5,000.00 5,000.00 ) 5,000.00 100 500.00 059 073 REMOVE ELEV. ROOF NO. 5,000.00 5,000.00 R 5,000.00 100 ' 500.00 060 084 NEW OPENINGS ELEV. ROOF NO. 1,000.00 1,000.00 € 1,000.00 100 100.00 061 074 !•1. S. TO FACIA LO EAST EL NO. 2,000:00 2,000.00 P '2,000.00 100 200.00 062 076 WING WALLS NE CORNERS 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 i ' 100.00 PAGE TOTAL 26,000.00 26,000.00 26,000.00 2,600.00r TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 05,850..00 105,850.00 105,850.0010,585.00 c r - AIA DOCUI.:�NT Gr03 CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA • O 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 —1973 LI— !�1 CO TINUATrON Sr -r t:T AIA DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION -AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. 00 In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. ' Use Column 1 on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. w N CO .1 LL PACE or 32 rAGLs APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICATION DATE: PERIOD FROM: TO; ARCHITECT'S PROTECT NO• 21 12/30/81 12/10/81 12/31/81 AIA DOCUh'FNT C7 3 CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIAe • 0 1978 TI IE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OT ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 —1973 A B C D E F G 11 I i ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULEDBALANCE VALUE WORK COMPLETED COMPLETED a (G=C) TO FINISH (C—G) I KL T.AINAGE Previous • Applications This Application frOTAL AND STORED •Work in Place Stored Materials (not in D or E) . TO DATE (D+E+F) 063 075 REMOVE OVERHANG EAST 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 50.00; 066 '088 070 ROOFING 2ND LEVEL 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 100 2,000.00 NEU PI;OUSE 077 WEST 'WING 6,500.00 6,500.00 6,500.00 100 650.00. 072 092 REPAIR ROOF;ELEV NO 1,000.00 '1,000.00 1,000.00 100 100.00 074 ' EAST WIN( • 079 M.S. TO FACIA .LO !•JEST•"& 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 350.00 075 REMOVE OVERHANG • 080 ''!EST WING 500.00 • 500.00 500.00 100 50.00 076 081 t!ING t':ALLS WEST ''WING 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 100.00 077 091 N P'HOUSE 'JEST WING 078 LATH, PLASTER LO EAST & • 082 EL NO. 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 100.00 082 t'J WING 083 LATH & PLASTER LO WEST L 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100 200.00 085 087 ROOFING HI ROOF 55,000.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 100 5,500.00 08G 090 ROOFING LO ROOF WEST 47,000.00 47,000.00 47,000.00 100 4,700.00 088 089 ROOFING LO ROOF EAST ,55,000.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 100 5,500.00 091 4 093 ROOFING WEST WING (A) 27,500.00 27,500.00 27,500.00 100 L2,75o.00 PAGE TOTAL 220,500.00 220,500.00 220,500.00 122,050.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 326,.350..00 326,350.00 326,350.00 [32,635.00 AIA DOCUh'FNT C7 3 CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIAe • 0 1978 TI IE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OT ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 —1973 . CCN E INUATGON SZ -MET AIA DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. FACE 6 rr 32 rAGES APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 1 2/3 0/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 C2) - TO: 12/31/81 0) ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9303 t•-.••4 A B C D E F j G H. �Q. ITE ITEM No. OF WORK - SCHEDULED VALUE WORK COMPLETED'TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED TO DATE (D-I-E-FF1 % (G=C) BALANCE FINISH `C—C;) RETAINAGE � PreviousTO Applications This Application 'Work in Place Stored Materials l (not in D or E) 092 094 ROOFING ELEV. ROOF NO. 55,000.00 55,000.00 55,000.00 100 5,500.00 t • • PAGE TOTAL 55,000.00 55,000.60 55,000.00 100 5,500.03 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 331,350.00 381,350.00 331,350.00 38,135.09; AIA [)r)C.Ut.1CNT 6703 • CONTINUATIQN SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA • © 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 —1g73 4.4 (V 01 w CONTiR1U,VUON SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 PAC,! 7 AIA Document G702, -APPLICATION 'AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLICATION NUMBER: 2'1 APPLICATION DATE: 1 2/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 TO 12/31/81 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 936 ; 32 P•.(.t< A 8 C D 1 E F i G H l I ITEM No. • DESCRIPTION OF WORK SFEX SCHEDULED VALUE WORK COMPLETED '01 AL CO'.1PLLIED AND STORED TO DATE ! (D+E+FI iGuCl BATA.(E iTAINACE TO FINISH (— L;; , Previous Applications This Application Work in Piace Stored Materials (Wolin Dorf) 100 101 IRRIGATION PIPE 5,000.00'-, 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.01 TOO 102 CURBS & DRAINS 7,500.00. 7,500.00 7,500;00.'100 750.0d 102 103 PAVING 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 100 3,000.0d 700.00 102 104 CONC. WALKS; ETC.. 7,000.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 100 104 105 FINISH IRRIGATION 5,000.00 5;'000.00 1 5,000.00 100 500.0d 104 106 .LANDSCAPEE ' 40,000.00 40,000.00 ! 40,000.00 100 4,000.0d 106 107 INSPECT & CORRECT 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 i 100.00; 111 112 RAMP & STEP•S.NE 5,000.00 5,.000.00 5,000.00 100 500.04 1 600.00! 111 113 CLEAR & GRADE 6,000,00 6,000.00 6,000.00 100 113 114 IRRIGATION PIPI1G 12,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 100. G 1,250.00 113 115 CURBS & DRAIN STRUCT. 22,500.00 •22 500.00 22,500.00 100 2,250.00 113 606 COOLING TOWER SLAB 1,000.00 1,000.00 E 1,000.00 100 100.00 115 PAVING INC. PREP & 116 BASE 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 100 j 5,000.00 1 115 117 m ---cunt. 610 ,FLAG PLAZA CONST. 15,000.00 15,000.00 ' ' 15,000.00 100 _: 1,500.00 WALKS, LIG. & POLES 9,500.00 9,500.60 i J 9,500.00 100 - 950.00 PAGE TOTAL 217,000.00 TOTAL OR SU TTOJTAL 1798,35 00 2177,00_I01_._�00 ;217,000.00 ; ?L,ZOfl_OjL;.. '59,8T5 nn 1 598733°.00 :598,350.00 AIA DOCUr :ENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA • 0 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 KEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 200'06 G703 —1{;73 COrNTrNUA1iO,J 51 -11 -LET AIA DOCUMENT G703 ' AIA Document G702, APPLICATION' AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's sinned Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. PACE 0 U 01 32 PAGE) APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 APPLICA•IION DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 TO; 12/31/81 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO" CM 0) AIA D!) ..Ul.1EN7 670] C:ONTINUA(ION SHEET • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA" • 0 1973 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 it` G703—197QT'I W acs A 13 C D E F CO ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED OLAI. No. VALUE Previous This Application CO!.9PLEIEU AND STORED % BALANCE kETAJNAL3E Applications Work in Place Stored Materials (not in D or E) TO DATE (D+E+f) (G=C) TO FINISHZ. (C—G) —tr AREA K 150 151 REMOVE SALVAGE 1 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.00 151 152 REMOVE SALVAGE II 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.00 151 153" DEMOLITION T. 11,000.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 100 1,109.00 153 154 DEMOLITION I. 11,000.00 11,000.00 • - 11,000.00 100 1,100:00 T53 155 M.S. PARTITIONS & CLOSURES I 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 350.00 153 156 E/M ROUGH -1N THRU CONC. FL 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100 200.00 153 159 PATCH & REPAIR INT. SURFACES 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 100 2,000.00 155 157 E/M ROUGH. -IN. ABOVE FL - 1 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 100 900.00 155 158 M.S. PARTITIONS & CLQSURES II 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 • 350.00 157 160 GYP BD TO WALLS 1 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 157 '161 E/M ROUGH -IN ABOVE• FLS II 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000.00 157 162 E/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, DEVICES I 18,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 100 1,800.00 163 GYP RD TO WALLS II 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 I PAGE TOTAL 103,000.00 103,000.Q0 103,000.00 10,300.00 1 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 701,350.00 701,350.00 ; 701,350.00 70,135.00Cr irr AIA D!) ..Ul.1EN7 670] C:ONTINUA(ION SHEET • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA" • 0 1973 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 it` G703—197QT'I W 2 C e-- CO LU L • CONTINUA ION sr•: ` AIA DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, I PPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. PAGE 9 i'•' 32 PAGES APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICATION DATE: PERIOD FROM: TO: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 21 12/30/81 12/10/81 12/31/81 9363 A 8 C O E F G II I ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA K SCHEDULED VALUE WORK COMPLE1LD NOTAL COMMTED AND STORED 10 DATE (D+E+F) 7., (G : C1 BAL;,r CE TO FINISH (C --Gr ..ET.INAGE ; Previous Applications This Application Work in Place Stored Materials (not in D or E) 160 165 CERAMIC TILE 4,500.00 4,500.00 • 4,500.00 100 450.00 160 165 GYP CD TO CEILINGS 3,000.00 ' 3,000.00 3,000.00 100 300.00 160 167 LAY -IN CEILINGS 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100 800.00 160 168 DOORS & HARDWARE 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 350.00 IC[) 169 MILLWORK & FIN CARP. 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 160 170 PAINTING 12,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 100 1,250.0'", 162 E/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, 164 DEVICES -II 18,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 100 1,800.0d 163 171 SPEC. ITEM'IS,• & ACCESS. 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 100 ( 900.0C 164 172 E/M EQUIP.,FIXTURES,TRIN 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 100 3,000.00 • 170• 173 FL COVERINGS & BASE' 9,500.00 9,500.00 9,500.00 100 950.0; 173 174 INSPECTION & CORRECTION 500.00 250.00 250.00 500:00 100ff0c ' . PAGE TOTAL 103,500.00 103,250.00 250.00 103,500.00 10,350.00i TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 804,850.00 804,600.00 250.00 ! 804,850.00 80,485.00 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA® • 0 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 — 1973 CON YINJuATioN srr EEET A!A DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. PACE 10 ` of 3? PACES APPLICATION NUMBER: 21. APPLICATION DATE: 1 2/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 1 2/10/81 TO 12/31/81 AR( HITr(T C L ?(IICr-T MC\. aids 05 L J C...7 AIA DOCUA.fNT G,�3 CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIN& • 0 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 4 G703 — 1373 La •... �.....ra... .. ...V JL_.. I.V. JJVJ A 8 C D� E F G , H I O if :I ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETEDTOTAL No. VALUE . This Application COMPLETED AND STORED %BALANCE RETAINAGE Previous + Applications Work in .Place Stored Materials (not in Dor E) TO DATE (D+E+F) (G=C) TO FINISH (C—G) AREA I iii . 200 201 REMOVE SALVAGE I 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.00 201 202 REMOVE SALVAGE II 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.00 201 203 DEMOLITION I • 11,000.00 11,000.00 11 ,000.00 100 1,100.00 203 204s DEMOLITION II 11,000.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 100 1,100.00 20g M.S. PARTITIONS & 205 CLOSURES I 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 350.00 203 E/M ROUGH -IN .THRU 206 CONC FL 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100 200.00 203 PATCH & REPA R INT. 209 SURFACES • 0 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 100 , 2,000.00 205 E/M ROUGH -IN. ABOVE FL 207 I 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 100 900.00 205 M.S. PARTITIONS & 208 CLOSURES II 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 350.00 207 E/M ROUGH -IN ABOVE 210 FLS II 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000.00 207 E/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, 2.11 DEVICES I 18,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 100 1,8Q0.00 207 212 GYP BD WALLS I 5,000.00 5,000.00 5•,000.00 100 500.00 7T0 211 C/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, 214 DEVICES II :18,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 100 1,800.00 PAGE TOTAL 116,000.00 116,000.00 116,000.00 11,600.00 1334%.11 TOTOAL OR SUB TOTAL 920;850.00:''920,600.00 250.00 920,850.00 • 92,085.00 �` AIA DOCUA.fNT G,�3 CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIN& • 0 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 4 G703 — 1373 La Cza , .CON Y'INUATIoN S! EET AIA DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column 1 on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. rAGI: 11 c)[ 32 • P•u,i: APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 TO: 12/31/81 ARCHITECT'S PROJE• 9 CT NO�(5:. A 0 • C D / F G 11 I ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA I SCHEDULED VALUE WORK COMPLETED FOTAL COMP! AND STORED TO DATE (D+E+F) °6 (G_ -C) BALANCE TO FINISH (C—G) niTAINAGE Previous Applications This Application Work in Place Stored Materials (Wolin Dorf) 212 213 GYP ED TO WALLS II 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 212 215 CERA!'IC TILE 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 100 45o.00 212 215 GYP EO TO CEILINGS 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 100 300.00 212 217 LAY -Ii! CEILINGS 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100 900.00 I 212 218 DOORS & HARDWARE 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 350.00 212 219 �� !•1ILLt,�RK & FIN CARP. 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 1 500.00 1 212 220 PAINTING;• . 12,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 100 1,250.00 213 221 SPEC. ITEMS & ACCESS. 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 100 900.00 214 222 E/M EOUIP. FIXTURES,TRIII 64,000.00 64,000.00 64,000.00 100 6,400.00 220 223 FL COVERINGS & BASE 9,500.00 9,500.00 9,500.00 100 950.00 223 224 INSPECTION &CORRETION 500.00 250.00 250.00 500.00 100 50.00 PAGE TOTAL 124,500.00 124,250.00 250.00 124,500.00 12,450.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 1,045,350.00 1,044,850.00 500.00 1,045,350.00 104,535.00 AIA DOCUMFNT G703 • CONTINUATION 5IIF[T • APRII 1978 EDITION • AIA • 0 1970 THE /MFR.ICAN IUS711UTE OF ARCIHIItCIS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 — 1573 CO'NrlNUAT147+`. SCM T AIA DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION -AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. PAGE 12 or 32 rActs APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 C;3j TO: 12/31/81 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9363 Lt A l3 C D E ( F G + 11 ( 441 RETAINAGE OApplications CP ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED VALUEy WORK COMPLEILD 'TOTAI. COM EIED To (G=C:) BALANCE TO TO FINCH (C—G. Previous w This Application AND S1ORED Work in•Place Stored nDoia TO DATE (DFE F) AREA J 250 251 REMOVE SALVAGE ,I 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.00 251 252 DEMOLITION I 11,000.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 100 1,100.00 252 253 REPLACE WINDOW LITES 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 50.00 252.; (•1. S. PARTITIONS & . 254 CLOSURES 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.00 252 E/M ROUGH—IN THRU 255 CONC. FL. • 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 100.00 252 PATCH & REPAIR 257 INT. SURFACES 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000.00 254 E/M P,OUGH=IN ABOVE 256 FL I 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 256 E/M ROUGH—IN. ABOVE 258 FLS II 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 256 259 E/(•1 WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, DEVICES I 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 .. 1 ,000.00 256 260 GYP BD TO WALLS I 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100 200.00 259 E/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, 262 DEVICES II 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000.00 260 261 GYP BD TO WALLS II 2,000.00 2,000.00 '2,000.00 100 200.00 260 1,000.00 263 CERAMIC TILE 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 100.00 til PAGE TOTAL 62,500.00 62,500.00 62,500.00 6,250.00 ;:: TOTAL OR SUB TOTALit--I 1,107,850.01 1,107,350.00 500.00 1,107,850.00 110,785.00 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIAe • © 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G733 — 1973L. CONTlNUATtON SNEt:T AIA DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column 1 on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. PACE 13 (IF f'ACLs A['PLICA.IION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 To: 12/31/81 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO• J63 A 8 C D E F G H J I ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA J SCHEDULED/TOTAL VALUE WORK COMPLETED COMPLETE(.)f3.11A::C'E AND SiORLD TO DATE ( D+E+r) `;o (G±C) TO FINISH (C—�') Ki T:1IhAGE * Previous Applications This Application Work ih Place Stored Materials (not in D or 1) 260 264 GYP BMJ TO CEILINGS 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 50.00 260 265 LAY -IN CEILINGS 4,000.00 4,000.00 • 4,000.00 100 400.00 260 266 000RS & HARDWARE 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100 200.00 260 267 MILL!'WORK & FINISH CARP. 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 100 300.00 260' 268 PAINTING 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100 800.00 261 269 SPEC. ITEMS & ACCESS. 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100 400.0 1,750.00 262 270 E/M EOUIP.,FIYTURES,TRIM 17,500.00 17,500.00 17,500.00 100 268 271 FLOOR COVERINGS & BASE 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 271 272 INSPECTION. & CORRECTION 500.00 250.00 250.00 500.00 100 50.00 PAGETOTAL 44,500.00 44,250.00 250.00 44,500.00 4,450.00. TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 1,152,350'.001,151,600.0) 750.00 1,152,350.00 115,235.00 AIA DOCUG:ENT G7a3 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA® • © 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 G703 — 1973 CONI t NUA1 tON Sf i[E tl' A1A DOCUMLNT 6703 AIA Document G702.:1PPLICATION.AND CERTIFICATE FOR•PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed £ertification.is attached. In tabulations beim... amounts arc stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. 32 -'0A(c APPLICATION NLMBER: 21 APPLICAt lc )N DATE: 12/30/81 cc PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 TO: 12/31/81 ARC 111E:C1'S PROJECT NO: 9353 A 8 C D. E j F i (; H �. ITEM No. DESC<1PTION OF WORK SCHEDULED VALUE WORK C(?'.lPLE1ED -TOTAL CC\iPILI ED ICS' C-' ii:\!•INCE TC) FINiSII • C (,• ,. c.TAtNAt.E j Y b cia Previous; Applications This Application AND STORED . Work in =lace Stored titatrnz s (not in DorE, . TO DALE ID•rE+EI AREA G "' 301 REMOVE SALVAGE I- i 2,500.00 2,500.00 2;500:00'1100 250.00 i 301 302 REMOVE SALVAGE II 2,500.00 2,500.00 •2,500.00 I 100 i 250.00 301 303 DEMOLITION •I ! 11 ,000.00 11 ,000.00 j 11 ,000.00 100 i ' 1,100.00 i; .e 303 304 DEMOLITION II i 11,000.00 • 11,000.00 • - 11,000.00 100 i 1,100.00 •303 305 M.S. PARTITIONS & CLOSURES I I 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 '_• 303 306 E/M ROUGH -IN UNDER CONC FL 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 ; 1,000.00 t 100 100 ! 100.00 ;. 75.00 303 30/ 303 311 MASONRY;WALLS F, CLO.; RLS I 750.00 750.00 750.00 PATCH & REPAIR INT. SURFACES 1 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 1003,000.00 ' 305 309 E/M ROUGH -IN ABOVE FL 1 I 14,000.00 • 14,000.00 i 14,000.00 100 i i 1,400.00 305 310 M.S. PARTITIONS & CLOSURES II 1 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 100 600.00 36 3O8 309 312 '.:;09 313 309- 314 PATCH CONC FLS 500.00 •500.00 500.00 100 ` 50.00 E/t1 ROUGH -IN ABOVE FLS II 1 14,000.00 • 14,000.00 )4,000.00 100 1 ,400.00t'J L/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, DEVICES I .; 25,000.00 • 25,000.00 , 25,000.00 100 - 1 CO i 2,500.00Tr- GYP. BD TO WALLS I 7,000.00 ' 7,000.00 130, 25(1'. 00 I T_7RITASn - n ff ; 7,000.00 130, 250.00 100 I 700.00r-1 1 3,025.000* PAGE TOTAL !130,211.00.1 TOTAL nR SHF TOTAI 1.282. GOO.00 750 00 1 282 600 nn ,100 'c^ ^^ '1 > AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CO\T'NUATION SH[ET • APRII 1978 [DITION • AIA" • 0 1978 TI II AM!RICAN INSTITUT[ UT.+R(:I[11TCT5,' 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703-1973 CONTINLJATtON SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 • AIA Document G702. APPLICATION: AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Conthl tor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below. amounts are stated to tl-e nearest dollar. Use Column 1 or Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLICATION NUMBER: APPLICA 1 ION t'Al E: PERIOD FROM: TO: ARCIIITECT•S PROJECT NO: .21 12/30/81 12/10/81 12(/_31 /81 93 3 A B C D. • aE F G ft I WORKCC1.�IFLETLD ITEM n DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED 'TOTAL COn1rLEtED 8:�1 A`•C; This Application No. VALUE AND STORED '; ..-.Cc TO I INISH Previous, Applications Place Stored hlatcrr.:c TO DATE IG-: CI (..--G: AREA G Work to (not in D or : ID+E-4 F) 313 E/l1 WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, 316 DEVICES II 25,000.00 •25,000.00 • 25,000.00 100 2,500.00 314 I 315 GYP BD TO WALLS II 8,000.00 ' 8,000.00 8,000.00 100 800,00 314 317 CERAMIC TILE 7,000.00 • 7,000.00 7,000.00 100 . 700.00; 314 318 GYP P BD TO CEILINGS 4,000.00 .4,000.00 4,000.00 100 400.00, 314' 319 LAY -I:9 CEILINGS .12,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 100 1,200.00: 314 320' DOORS & HARDWARE 7,000.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 100 700.00 314 321 MILLt0RK-.&'FIN. CARP. 10,000.00 10;000:00 10,000.00 100 1,000.00' 314 322 PAPAINTINGNG •a • 14,000.00 14,000.00 14,000.00 900 "1,400.00 315 323 SPEC. ITEMS. &ACCESS. 12,000.00 12 000.00 ' 12,000.00 100 1,200.00, 316 .. 324 E/M EQUIP,FIXTURES,TRIM 50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 100 5,000.00 322 325 FL COVERINGS & BASE 12,000.00 12' 000.00 ' 12,000.00 00 1,200.00 325 326 INSPECTION & CORRECTION 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 1,000.00 100 100.00 1 PAGE TOTAL 162,000.00 161,500.00 500.00 162,000.00 16,200.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOT/\L1,44,600 001,443,500.00 1,250.00 1,444,600.00 144,460.00 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CU`rr:UArION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA" • 0 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF A.R(.HITECIS, 1735 Nr.Y YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 — 1973 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 P m,1 16 32 r \c,?. AIA Document G70.2. APPLICATION. AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification iS attached. In tabulations below amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column 1 on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLICATION Nt!MBE R: APPLICATION DATE: PERIOD FROM: 1'0 : ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO 21 12/30/81 12/10/81 12/31/81 9363 C A B C D E i F j G ' W t i I1, ITEM No. • DESCRtPTION OE WORK SCHEDULED VALUE WORK CCmPLETEDOTAI. CONVECTED ;o (G -:•o i!► BALANCE. •'si` �i TO FINISH (' C) Previous Applications This Application • AND STORED Work in -lace TO DAZE Stored Malena's 1 (D+E+F) (not in D or E, AREAH - i .' ! 4 , as 350 — i i 351 CONC. FOUNDATIONS 15,500:00. 15,500.00 i 15,500.00_100 i 1,550.001 351 ! ( i 352 CONC COLUMNS 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 100 ( 900.00f 351 E/M ROUGH—IN CONC. 353 & MAS. I 1,500.00 1,500.00 • 1,500.00 100 150.001 35] 1 354 MASONRY 15,000.00 15,000.00 ; 15,000.00 100 1 1,500.00i 354 } 355 H.M. FRAMES 750.00 750.00 750.00 100 j 75.00 354 i 356 CONC. BEAMS 12,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 100 1,200.00! 356 I 357 CONC. FLOOR SLAB 9,000.00 9,000.00 ? 9,000.00 100 900.00 356 358 STRUCTURAL STEEL 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 100 2,000.001 357 i i 361 M.S. PARTITIONS & FURRIP\iG 1,000.00 1,000.00 -' 1,000.00 100 100.001 357 362 E/M ROUGH—IN 1,600.00 1,600.00 1,600.00 100 i 160.00 I 358 359( NET. & CONC ROOF DECKS 10,000.00 10,000.00 i 10,000.00 100 - 1,000.00 359 1 i 360 EXT STUCCO 5,000.00 5,000.00 '5,000.00 100 f 500.00 359 363 ROOFING & FLASHIt1G •• 13,000.00 13,000.00 100 ! 1,300.001 PAGE TOTAL X13,000.00 113,350.00 113,350:.00 i 113,350.00 11,335.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 11,557,950.001,556,700.0q 1,250.00 1,557,950.0p j :155,795.00 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CI». I .I'A1IQ J SHEET • APRII. 1978 EDITION • AIA" • 1978 11IC AMI RICAN INSTITUTE OT A.R(HIITCIS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 CO ' G703—1973w LL CNI CO 01 CO LU Li— CONI INJA"CIO J SHEET' A/A UOCUMLNT 0703 1',c.T 17 32 AIA Document G702. APPLICATION.AND CERTIFICATE FOR.PAYMENT, containing Contractor's sigred Certification is attached. In tabulations below . amounts are stated to t -e nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variabit retainage for line items may apply. APPLICAI ION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 TO: 12/31/81 ARCI111 LCT'S PROJECT NO: 9363 A 8 C D. E F G I I i ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREA H SCHEDULED VALUE WORK CO''PLET[D `TOTAL COMPUTED AND STORED TO DALE "•"" ' ' E1 l '. i G'•C1 I i I: \L �� _E TO fI\15H L -G 4IN ,�"= ! Previous Applications -`FIs Application I Work i ace Suot id Materia's . (not in D or E 362 367 E/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCT, DEVICES 2,500.00 2,500.00 . 2,500.00 100 250.00 363 364 GYP BD T0'WALLS 3,050.00 3,050.00 i 3,050.00 100 305.00 1 364 365 CEILT(;GS 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 350.00 364 366 DOORS & HARDWARE 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100 i =00.9 364 368 PAINTING • 2,000.00 2,000.00 i 2,000.00 100 200.00 ' 367 369 E/M EQUIP, FIXTURES TRIM 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 368 370 CARPET & BASE , 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100 200.00 ' 36 371 SPEC. ITEMS. & ACCESS. 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 • 100.00 370 372 SEATS, .:1 F r r'l•:ORK &FIN CARP, 13,000.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 100 1.300.00 372 373 ? INSPECT & CORRECT 500.00 250.00 250.00 500.00 100 .. 50.00 . 1 i 1 . i PAGE TOTAL j 34,550.00 34,300.00 250.00 i 34,550.00 :1,592,500.0 ' 3,455.00 1 159,250.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL „.592,.500.0Q1'591,000.00 1,500.00 AIA DOCUMENT G703 CONTINUATION SHEET ' • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA0 • © 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 L:_',V YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 6703—i:73 (UNtiiNUAeiON 51-TEEu A171 DOCUM NT G703 32 r Al AIA Document G702 I PPLICATION,AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification.is attached. In tabulations below. amounts are stated to :he nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLICA HON NUMBER: APPLICATION DATE: PERIOD FROM: • 10: ARCI i(1 EC1'S PROJECT NO: , 21 12/30/81. 12/10/81= 12/31/81/t�•4� 9363 `/J A AIA B ; C D. E F G W HId ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK COsIPLETLD -UTAL CC)mPlf IED No. WORK SCHEDULED i VALUE This App icatirm AND Slr)REU BALANCE E ' t'r TO FINISH • Previous Applications Work in P.acc TO DAZE Stored titaten;'S U+CF) (not in D or E {C. CI IC L. AREA FFDD 400 401 REMOVE SALVAGE I 2,500.00 2,500.00 ! 2,500.00 100 250.001 401 -.Yr? 402 REMOVE SALVAGE II 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.0: 401 403 DEMOLITION: I . 11,000.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 100 1,100.00: 4 Q13 4094 DEMOLITION 'II ': 11,000.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 100 1,100.09 405 M.S. PARTITIONS & CLOSU:'ES 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.0; 403 E/M ROUGH -IN UNDER 406 CONC. FL.. ' 3,000.00' 'WALLS 3,000.00 ' 3,000.00 100 200,0, 403 MASOF,RY AND 407 CCOSIJRES ": 7,500.00 7,500.00 -■ I 7,500.00 100 750.00. 403 411 PATCH & REPAIR INT. I SURFACES 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 00 3,000.00, 405 409 E/f'1 ROUGH -IN ABOVE FLOOR 1 i 15,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 100 1,500.09 405 410 M.S. PARTITIONS & CLOSURES II .. 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000:00 100 600.00 406408 PATCH CONC FLS 3,500.00 3',500.00 -■ 3,500.00 100 350.09 409 412 GYP PD TO IfALLSI 7,000.00 7,000.00 ' 7,000.00 00 ! %00.09; 409 413 E/M ROUGH -IN ABOVE FLS II : 16,000.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 100 1,600.00 PAGE TOTAL 120,000:90- 70-,-0-0D.00 120,000.00 _ • 12,n00.02: TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 1,712,500.001,711 1,500.00 1,712,500.00 ■ 171,250,0 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SIIH.T • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA0 • © 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 *.EW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703-19 CONTINLIATtO''1 SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 P At.F 10 32 .A1cumcnt G702. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing C. ctor's signed Certification is attached. : lations be:o:., amounts are stated to ;he nearest dollar. Uscolumn I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. 00 APPLICATION NIlmE3ER: .21 APPLICATION DATE: 1 2/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 10. 12/3.1181 ARCHITECT'S I'ROILCT NO: Jjoa WAIA DOCUMENT G793 • CONTI::UAIION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA • © 1978 W(11E AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20t)C6 G703-15'73 Ar B C D. E I F i G li I ITf�[1 aty CESc :tt'TIO' OF NORK I SCHEDULED VALUE AREA FFDD WORK CC•.tPLETLD -07:11. C(1�tPlETEI) i AND STORED F TO DATE tD+E-I-F) I °� (G-: Ci 1''\t ''\C` ' .!•..“,E T(? Fig >F! L.--.. Previous Applications This Application I I Work ir: ?iacc Stored Materia'; toot In D or EI 409 E/f'1 WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, 414 DEVICES I ? 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 100 3,000.0, 412 415 GYP BD TO CALLS II I 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100 I 800.00 412 417 CERAMIC TILE • 18,000.00 18,000.00 18,000.00 100 1,800.f; 412 .. 418 GYP BD TO CEILINGS' I 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.0 0 100 400.7. 412 419 LAY=Its CEILINGS : 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000.C') 412 420 DOORS & HARDWARE ' 7,000.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 100 700.0 412 421 MILLWORK & FIN.;.CARR. 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100 . 800.`:'i 412 c 422 PAINTI:;G 1 15,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 100 I 1,500.C, 414 E/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, 416 DEVICES II 30,000.00 t 30,000.00 30 000.00 100 � 3,000.C1 415 ; 423 SPEC. ITEMS & ACCESS. '•, 15,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 100 1,500.0; 416 E/M EQUIP., FIXTURES, 424 TRIM 75,000.00 75,000.00 75,000.00 100 7,500.^7 422 425 FL COVERINGS & BASE 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000.C1 425 t . 426 INSPECTION & CORRECTIONS 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 • 1,000.00 100 100,00 e'•' PAGE TOTAL 231,000.00 230, 500.00 5.00.00 1 231 000.00 1 1 • v-4 ap TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 1,943,500.001,941,500.00 2,000.00 .1,943,500.00 194,350.00 WAIA DOCUMENT G793 • CONTI::UAIION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA • © 1978 W(11E AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20t)C6 G703-15'73 CONTINUAT,ON SHEET J11J1 DOCUi 'ENT C,"r7 ALA Document G702. APf LICATION•AND CERTIFICATE FOR-PAY!%.1ENT, _:r.-aining Contractor's si zned Certification is attached. In tabulations nelov.. amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items <�av AFT! ICAIIUN \t_,.1tiER: 21 APPLICATION DALE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 TO: 12/31/81 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9363 A B C D. I E F G H ( I .O ��.�.�� BALANCE WV. TO !WISH (_—G cEF; • ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK 1 SCHEDULED VALUE WORK CO'�?PLETED OT:1L COMPLETED qo IG --CI •:e•:IC.V a: I,ilcz;tris I' This Application AND STORED I I , Work In Place ITO DATE orcerials Sl(not d+nMDati 1D-F+ or Ei AREA BBBB I • _J 450 451 REt;0'.JE SALVAGE I 2,500.00 2,50103 J 2,500.00 100 i 250..00 451 452 REMO :'E SALVAGE II 2,500.00 2,500 -DD. 2,500.00 100 250.00 �. 451 453 DEMOLITION. I 10,000.00 TC.0DC.:1.1 10,000.00 100 I 1,000.00 45,3 • , . 454 DEMOLITION II10,000.00 T0,030...0 ; 10,000.00 100 1,000.00 453 M.S. PARTITIONS & 455 CLOSmES I 2,000.00 2,00D..•:o i 2,000.00 100 200.00 453 E/M :TOUGH -IN UNDER 456 CONC FL; + - 1,000.00 ii,000= 1,000.00 100 100.00 453 457 MASONRY WALLS &CLOSURES 1,000.00 11 ,00L..COt 1,000.00 100 100.00 453 PATCH & REPAIR INT 461 SURFACES ' 20,000.00 20,000•.:0 i 20,000.00 100 2,000.00 455 E/t1 ROUGH -IN ABOVE - J 459 FL 1 8,000.00 3,000..:0 8,000.00 100 .. 800.00 455 M.S. PARTITIONS & 460 CLOSURES II 3,000.00 3,000..013 3,000.00 100 300.00 456 . 458 PATCH CONC FLS 500.00' 500..x17 500.00 100 50.00 459 162 GYP BD TO WALLS I 6,000.00 6,00;1`.70 ' 6,000.00 100 600.09 • 459 E/ti ROUGH -IN ABOVE 463 FLS II 10,000.00 Io,002 ct-1 . 10,000.00 100 :` 1,000.00 .;, PAGE TOTAL 76,500.00 75,50�'1Ji 76,500.00 N ' 7,650.00 • CO • TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL:2,020,000.0p 2,018,000.00 2,000.00 ;2,020,000.00 202,000.00 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHUT • APRIL 1978 EUITIOr. • Ask*/ • © 1978 TH[ A IRICAr !N!.IITUTE or AR(.HITICTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.VJ., vi'.SHIN i :`+.. D.C. 20006 • G703-15"'.3 W In • d V CO 01 w L CON1[NUATiCN SHEET AMA DOCUMENT C703 AIA Document G702. APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's sic^.ed Certification is attached. In tabulations helov,-. amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. PA( 21 c''3? i'AC APPLICA rioN Nl!',1fiLR: 21 APPLICATION DA IE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 10: 12/31/81 ARCI-IITLCT•S PROILCT NC): A B ! C D. E F G II i I IT: At No. DESCniPTION Of WORKSCHCDULED AREA BBBB VALUE ‘YORK CCSv1PLETLD TOT\I. CO.`•?i';LTEI' ^,'0 (G±C 1 Fr..;c TC) FINN 1.4 (C --C;, .GE Previous Applications This Application 1 I AND STORED Work ,n Place Stored Materials (not in D or E TO DATE ID+E�F 459 464 E/M WIRE, PIPE, DUCTS, DEVICES I 17,000.00 17,000.00 17,000.00 100 1,700.00 462 465 GYP GD TO MALLS II6,000.00 6,000.00 € 6,000.00 100 600.001 462 467 CERAM,C TILE ! 5,000.00 5,000.00 . 5,000.00 100 500.00! 462 468 GYP ED TO CEILINGS' 2,000.00 2,000.00 • 2,000.00 100 200.00! 462 469'• LAY2CEILINGS •` 7,000.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 100 700.00 462 470 DOORS & HARDWARE 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 100 . 350.001 600.00; 462 471 MILL1':ORK &:FIN. CARP. 6,000.00 • 6,000.00 ( 6,000.00 462 472 PAINTING 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 i 1,,000.00 464 466 E/(•1 WIRE, PIPE; DUCTS, DEVICES II € 16,000.00 16,000.00 j 16,000.00 100 1,600.0d 465 473 SPEC. ITEMS & ACCESS. 8,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100 800.00 4667 474 472- 475 E/M EQUIP,, FIXTURES, TRIM 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00.100 2,500.00 FL COVERINGS & BASE 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 100 900.06 475 476 INSPECTION & CORRECTION 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 i 50.00' ! t PAGE TOTAL • :115,000.00 115,000.00 115,000.00 11,500.OU , TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 2,135,000.002, 133,000.0C 2,000.00 2,135,000.00 ;213,500.0d AIA DOCUMENT G:03 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIAa • © 1970 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHI IFCTS, 1735 *.EW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 —1'173 CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 32 p:,t,t, AIA Document G702 APPLICATION • AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's Signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below. amounts are stated to ''-ie nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. AI'PLIC\fIC-)N NUMBER: 21 APPUCA I ION DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 To: 12/ .3-161,1 ARCIIITLCT'S PROJECT NO: CeD eel. A B 6 C D. 1 E \VORK CO\SPLETED F G "OT'AL COMMIE() °,. (G= -Cl H ' r O =.;Ta.lNAGi rI.�Ci TO HNI91 me: • G ( au ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF 1\ ORK SCHEDULED VALUE Previous Applicaubns This Application AND STORED ,Work in Place 10 DAIS Stored.Matcr(1! 104-NJ)C ;not in D or E: AREA AAAA - 500' 501 REMOVE SALVAGE• I 2,500.00. 2,500.00 F 2,500.00 100 j 250.00 i 501 502 REMOVE SALVAGE II 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 : 250.00 ` 501 i 503 DEMOLITION 'I 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 ; 1,000.00 503 504 DEMOLITION II ? 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000.00 : 503 E/M PARTITIONS & ; • i 505 CLOSURES I 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 100 300.00 503 E/M ROUGH -IN UNDER i 506 CONC. FL } 1,000.00. 1,000.00 1 1,000.00 100 100.00 503 l 507 MASONRY WALLS & CLOSURES -5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 503 PATCH & REPAIR 511 INT. SURFACES F 25,000.00 25,000.00 ' 25,000.00 100 i 2,500.00 505 E/M ROUGH -IN ABOVE i •• 509 FL I 11,000.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 100 1,100.00• 505 M.S. PARTITIONS & 510 CLOSURES II i 3,500.00 3,500.00 i 3,500.00 100 i 350.00 506 508 PATCH CONC FLS 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 50.00 i 509 GYP BD TO,WALLS 1 7,000.00 512 7,000.00 .• 7,000.00 100 1 700.00 l 509 E/M ROUGH -IN ABOVE .'t 1 513 FLS II 13,000.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 100 ! 1,300.00 PAGE TOTAL i 94,000.00 94,000.00 94,000.00 CN,Iv 9,400.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAC'. 12,229,000.002,227,000.00 2,000.00 2,229,000.0;222,900.00 • AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • MA0 • 0 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 • • G703 —1973 Cr) W CONTINUATION SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 _.. ,L\ not.orm-r.; ." .: Ai'1'l Ir. Al ION ANI) CERTII ICA1 L I OR PAYMENT, containint; Cont,, tors - " .'; ''i.rl!ti(dtron is attacked �:1 tdt�U!,kl�r)tls _ amounts are stated to •"e nearestCXD dollar. Ceiuinn ictainage for line items may apply. Oeti Irc fiCo r.,r F 23 32 r :. AI'I'll'. '\IiiIN N.l\11;11:: 21 Arl'! i( AI lt,N Dm/ . 12/30;'1 i'; i:10D t I:C1,\1: 12/10/81 10: 12/31081 ARCHITECT'S ('I:oiECT NO• & C D. E E H ITC•.1 1 No. 4 1 t :.nrF11UV ��i :,L7ni. ?LHC(�UCED y 1AtUE _ ri�� I ARE:, AAAA • \VOR CO.Mt'CE1LD "U1 \L COW!! I ED \'.D SiC?C:CU `^ (G -C; 1 (i•�LANC= TO Elr.,; . C C, •-• •i Previous { Applications I i This Application \',cr .. Price iU D .11 sl"red "'lief._ ; (_l— — ;not �n U Or• .509 I E/M :.-ii7:E, PIPE, DUCTS, i 514 :DEVICES I 20,000.00 20,000.00 i i 0 ' 20,000.00 100 1 2,000.0. 1b12 515 GYP ED TO WALLS II 7,000.00 7,000.00 • 7,000.00 1° 100 700.00: (512 :517 CER," -.=':=C TILE 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 . 500.f 51 GYP3 • 5.:, � TO CEILINGS 3,000.00 , 000.00 • 3 000.00 �^ 100 • 300.00 j519 ;512 1520 LAY -IN CEILINGS 3,000.00 8,000.00 8,000.00 100 800.00• DOORS & HARDWARE 1 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 100 450.i�0 5i2 1521 - 1 MILLWORK & FIN CARP. ; 8,500.00 8,500.00 8,500.00 100 850.0 12 522 i PAINTING 1 12,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 '100 1 ,200.00 1 514 '516 E/M 1- IF E, PIPE, DUCTS DEVICES II-. i 25,000.00 - 25,000.00 : 25,000.00 '100 2,500.00: 515 523 t SPEC. ITEMS & ACCESS. I 9,000.00 9,000.00 60,000.00 ? 9,000.00j1Q0 i 60,000.00 1 100 • .. 900.00 6,000.00 516 524 i- E/M EOUIP,FIXTURES,TRIM! 60,000.00 522 525 FL. COVERINGS & BASE ! 9,000.00' 9,000°00 • 9,000.00 100 900..0: 525 526 i INSPECTION & CORRECTION; 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 , • 50.00. • PAGE TOTAL ,171,500.00 171,500.00, 2,000.00 ::171,500.00 2,400,500.001 • I 17,150.00 240,050.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 2,400,500.002,398,500.00 AIA DOCUMENT G703 ° CO;\T:'.;,.A110N SKEET • APRIt. 19713 EDITION • AIA2 • G 1979 THE . . CkiCAN 1'•S7ITUTE. OE ARCHt l IC TS, 173= '•EV: 1ORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20.K6 G703 --- ? 3 CONTINUATION SHEET MA DOCUMENT G703 Pic .. 24 AIA Document C-02..APPLIC\TIQNAND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification fs attached. In tabulations b=low. amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column 1 on Contracts ‘%here variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLICATION NU'.t3ER: 21 APPLICATIC)N DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 12/31/81 ARCI111EC1"S I'RO;ECT N0: Qio� 32 '' 00 A 8 C D. E F ! G H. WORK COMPERED ITEM DESCRIPTION OF sVORK SCHEDULED :TOTAI. COWIEltD LA' -r: No. VALUE Previoue" This Apphcahon • AND STORED 1C) DATF T. C1 TO FINISH 'Work Stored Matena'= Applicatiiris ' :G- (-- <; ;n Place (not in D or E (D"E+Fl ,- AREA CCCC 550 551 REMOVE SALVAGE I 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.00 551 552 REMOVE SALVAGE II 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 100 250.0): 551 553 DEMOL=TION 'I . 10,000.00 10,000.00 j 10,000.00 100 1.000.00 553 554 DEMOLITION II 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000:001 553 LLS. PARTITIONS & _ 555 CLOSURES I 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 100 • 300.0;; 553 556 MASONRY VALLS & CLOSURES 1,000.00. 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 100.00•. 553 E/M RCUGH—IN UNDER 557 CONC FL " 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 100.000` 553 PATCH & REPAIR INT. 561 GURFT.CES 24,000.00 24,000.00 24,000.00 100 2,400.00 555 E/M ROUGH—IN ABOVE 559 FL I 10,000.00 10,000.00 1 10,000.00 100 1,000.011 555 M.S. PARTITIONS & 560 CLOSURES II 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 100 350.00 557 558 PATCH COI1C FLS 500.00 500.00 . 500.00 100 50.00 559 E/('1 ROUGH=IN ABOVE 562 FLS II 12,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 100 1,200.03 559 E/M 1 IRE, PIPE, DUCTS,.r 563 DEVICES I 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 100 2,000.00' PAGE TOTAL 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 N 10,000.00 CO. TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 2,500,500.00 2,498,500.00 2,000.00 :2,500,500.00 5.72250,050.00- AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA® • © 197E THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Or ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 2C006 G703.1973 CONI iNUJAT(ON 51-1LE T AIA DOCUMENT G703 .`) AIA Document G702. APPLICATION.AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below. amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLIC.\1 R_)N APPLICATION DATE: PERIOD FROM: 21 12/30/81 12/10/81 12/ 311 81 ARCI IITCCT'S 1'ROILCT Nt): 936j 32 PAGH A 13 C D. E l F G H j I ITEM DESCRIPTION OF \N.ORK AREA CCCC . SCHEDULED WORK COMPLETED LOT•\i. (:tl',tf'IE fE[) AND STOREDii•\I .10 DATE 10+E+11 G C1 ANCE 10 F ItiIH I (;' r•.INACE i Previous- Applications his Application 1'.ork: ,n Place Stored Killen'', [not in ' or E+ 559 564 GYP BD TO WALLS I 6,000.00 6000:00 6,000.00 100 600.00; 563 566 E/M lJ1RE, PIPE, DUCTS, DEVICES II 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 100 2,000.00; 554 565 GYP BD TO WALLS II 7,000.00 7,000.00 I 7,000.00 100 700.00 564 568 GYP BD TO CEILINGS 3,000.00 3,000.00 . 3,000.00 100 300.00; 565€ 59 LAY—IN —IN CEILINGS 3,000.00 8 000.00 ' 3,000.00 100 800.00' 564 570 DOORS & HARDWARE 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 100 450.00' 554 571 MILLS•:ORK. &'FIN CARP. 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.00 '' 564 572 PAINTING 14,000.00 14,000.00 14,000.00 00 •1,400.00 565 573 SPEC. ITEMS, & ACCESS. 12,000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 100 1,200.00 566 574 E/I.1 EQUIP., FIXTURES, TRII1 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 100 1 3,000.00 572 575 5/5 576 jFL COVERINGS & BASE 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 100 900.00 INSPECTION & CORRECTION 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 . 50.00 ---j , PAGE TOTAL 119,000.00 119 000.00 . 119,000.00 11 900_,f0. TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 2,619,500.002,617,500.00 2,000.00 2,619,500.00 i 261,950.00 ALA DOCUMENT 6703 • Cr.lNi'I .I;ATIE)N SHEET • AI'12II 1978 (011ION • AIA • 1973 111( AMT INSTITUTE Of P.F:C11t1IC:IS, 1731 N[N YORK AVE., NAV., WASHINGTON, D.C. 2E/'OG ' G703-1973 . . CONTENJA110'J SHEET AIA DOCUMENT G703 P \:,E AIA Document 6702, -APPLICATlOtd.AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. 26 32 PAG:; 9! APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 1 2/30/81 4 cm PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 10: 12/31/81 11-4 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: ,:63 A B C D E F G II ITEM No. DcSCRIPTION OF WORK SFEX SCHEDULED VALUE I I WORK COMPLETED TOTAI. COMPLETED This Application AND SIOF:EU % BALANCE. r'i iAl\AGE FINISH Previous Applications Work in Place Stored Material: : I TO DATE (not in D or E, ID FE FF1 G-`- (C i0 LC --GL a n1 600 601 INSTALL ANTENNA 500.00 500.00 500.00 100 50.00 602 603 RLhOVE MALS & SHORII;G B/WAY ' 500.00 500.00 500.00 ' 100 50.00 603 604 STRUCT. SH BRACING 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 100 500.01 604 605 CONC. SLAB • 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 100 300.0' 606 607 COOLING TOWER. ENCLOSURE 1,500.00 1,350,.00 150.00. 1,500.00 100 • 150.00 608 609 REMOVE TIOD BLDG. 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100 100.00 610 611 FINISH IRRIGATION 12,500.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 100 1,250.60 610 612 FINE GRADE.&.LANDSCAPE 60,000.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 100 6,000.00 612 613 INSPECT & CORRECT EXT:' 7,000.00 500.00 500.00 1,000.00 100 100.00 614 616 PATCH & REPAIR EXT. STUCCO 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 100 1,000.00 615 617 619 EXT. PAINTING 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 100 2,000.00 620 INTERIOR INTERFACET 7,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 100 750.00 621 FINAL & ACCEPTANCE 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 100 200.00 917 618 COMPLETE AREA E 4,000.00 4, 000.00 4,000.00 100 400.00 PAGE TOTAL 128,500.00 125,850 60 2,650.00 1128,500.00 CV 12.,850.00 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 2,748,000.002,743,350-.00 4,650.00 2,748,000.00 511 :`274,800.00' AIA DOCUMENT C703 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA0 • 0 1978 Tit AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEY7 YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 z— '—{ CD w G703 —11173 CONTiNUATIOl's1.5HF:E.T AIA DOCUNIENT G70.3 fl' L IC)N ANI) C1:TIFICATE FOR I'AYMLNT, containin Camila( tors - 7.ncci (.....:rtitiction is attached. In tabulations ,-i,rici.trtS are stated to ti -.test .:se Column I ..n CCt hete xariabler tin'2 for line items may apply. • 32 NT! lc A11( v.: ••• I•;: \T 1: T2/30/81 PITI•11(..)i) I \Y 12/10/81 ic! 12/31/81 Apst. i;li i.1 (.• HP it AA DOl:LiMINT G703 • II.EET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA '4 • e 1973 INS1ITUTE OF M.:(11.111r.TS, 1735 NEW YOP.K AVC., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 2C)O(. G7G3 —1973 LLSC•Is.r7:(.:\ 7i ,AtHil• i • , -lit: i)l.'llli %AW E -- r .\)rliCaliw• • ANI) !,I( ',ii) 10 DAT! ,, [-- i; I ' , • , ______ __ _.. . 222.80 Previous APP1ication7, ' \\ .::.. .7 E' ,,cc;1)- j.not in D i:• : . 42— . • 2,228.09 . .9 1 LCO. -272-2m , 2,228—..09 0-00---'1 10.0. 43 —0— • 3,8/4.13 1 : ! : 3,874773110G i 387.477 ,C.O. 3,8/4.73 ',1:.0. 05 i 2.000.00 2,000.00 2,0010j]00 200 —00 — iC.O. =6 . . —0- 10.0. 47 • . 16.022.61 16,022.61 16,022.61 1100 1,602.25 " co. 48 • 50,655.92 50,655.92 I L • 50,655.92 000 5,065.03 ; 335.59 C.J. 49 3,355.88 3,355.88 • i 3,355.88 1100 1C.0. 410 40,789.47 40,789.47 10,069.96 i i 40.789.47 I00 10,069.96 1100 1 4,078.95 1,007.00 1C.O. 411 ' • 10,069.96 C.O. 412 • 47,720.29 47,720.29 '; • 47,720.29 HOO .. 4,772.03 C.O. 413 •' 24,993.37 24-,993.37 . 24,993.37 1100 1 2,499.34 CO. 414 4,304-.96 • 4,304.96 " 4,304.96 100 430.50 C.O. 415 1,084.30 1,084..30 1,084.30 100 108.43 • C.O. 416 838.65 838.65 838.65 100 83.87 ! C.O. #17 —0— . - . F.O. 418 C. O. #19 ! 1 . 1,360.57 7,132.52 1,360.57 7,132.92 1,360.57 7,132.52 100 100 136.05 713.25 1 1 C.O. 420 ; 1,536.56 1,536.56 1,536.56 'P00 153.66 217,96/.88 . 217,967.88 21,796.79' r • .VG7 TOTTI,L 1 /;;— i I 217,967.83 ' ITOT AL OR SUB TOTAL 2,965,067.842,961,317.88 1 4,650.00 1 ! :2,965,967.8b 296,596.79 AA DOl:LiMINT G703 • II.EET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA '4 • e 1973 INS1ITUTE OF M.:(11.111r.TS, 1735 NEW YOP.K AVC., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 2C)O(. G7G3 —1973 • .C.0 ;\11 NU;\TECI••J S•'Gci AIA DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. PAGE LiC)F 32 PAGES APPLIf:A1 ION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 EN 10: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT N 12/31/81 A E3 C D E F G II I r0 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULEDOFAL WORK COMPLETED•�: COMPLETED No. VALUE x This Application AND SR)RED BALANCE 70 [WISH -;ETAINAGE Previous Applications Work in Place Stored Materials (not in D or E) TO DATE (D+E+F) (G=C) IC—(') ,� 0 4 C.O. 1121 2,249.25 �, 2,249.25 2,249.25 100 1 224.93 C.O. 1122 984.65 984.65 984.65 100 93.47; C.O. #23 ,' 1,707.06 1,707.06 1,707.06 100 T 170.70 I C.O. 24 i C.O. #25 1,519.04 1,519.04 1,519.04 100 151.90.1 C.O. 1125 533.12 533.12 533.12 100 53.31° C.O. #27• 2,265.80 2,265.80 2,265.80 100 226.53; C.O. 1128 •.. —0— ■ C.O. #29 510.99 510.99 510.99 100 51.10; C.0.#30 607.31 607.31 • 607.31 00 60.731 C.0.1131 1,148.80 1,148.80 1,148.80 00 114.88; C.0.#32 442_.22 442.2.2 • 442.22 100 44.22 . N F n 1 PACE TOTAL 11,958.2'i 11,968.24 11,968.24 1,196.82? TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 2,977,936.12 2,973,286.1, 4,650.00 2,977,936.1 . �-- ice• 297,793.61.' AIA VOCU1.".!'NT 6'33 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1973 EDITION • AIA • © 1973 THE AMEftIC/.N INS111UTE OF AI:ClaircTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 • 1 W L 1973 OCI CO a) w CON T ENU,11 ON f.".1'{E6_T AIA DOCUMENT G703 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. 29 PAGE of 32 i'Aci APPLICAFION ;UMBER: 21 APPLICAIION DATE: 12/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 10; 12/3781 ARCHl1 ECT'S PROTECT A 8 C D E F I G 11 I ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED VALUE WORK COMPLETED ?TOTAL COMPLETED I AND STORED II ' 7� G= C) tiAIANCF. TO FItiISH ICG) ;;.i I:�I^:AGE Previous" Applications This Apt plication Work in Place 1 Stored Materials 7.. DATE IDi E+F) (not in D or E) C.0.#33 2,367.83 2,367.83 2,367.83 100 2,;6.7, 3 C.0.1=34 2,413.36 2,413.36 ( 2,413.36 100 241.34 C.0.#35 3,384.76 3,384.76 1 3,384.76 100 339.48 C.0.'-.`25 1,409.80 1,409.80 1,409.80 100 140.98 C.0.137 13,294.98 11,965.48 1,329.50 1 13,294.98 100 1,329:,50 C.0.#33 1,931.90 1,931.90 1,931.90 100 193.19 C.0.#39 6,482.91 6,482.91 11,244.81 6,432.91 1 11,244.81 100 100 ,; .. 43.29 1,124.48 C.0.#40:' 11,244.81 C.0.1=41 2,308.94 2;308.94 ' 1 2,303.94 100 230.89 C.O."42 1,912.77 1,912.77 1 1,912.77 100 .. 191.23 C.0.#43 2,258.82 2,258.82 i 2,258.82 100 225.83 C.0.1`-44 6,514.49 6,514.49 1 6,514.49 100 651.45 C.0.1145 1,355.82 1,355.82 1 1,355.82 100 135.58 C.0.#16 1,214.87 607.43 60,7.44 1,214,87 100 121.49 C.0.147 2,139.32 1,069.66- 1,069.66 + 2,139.32 100 213.93 PAGE TOTAL 60,235.38 57,228 78 3,006.60 ! 60,235.38 6,023.54 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 3,038,171.50 2,030,514.93 7,656.60 °3,038;171.5C 303,817.15 AIA nUCvf."._.^1T G,�3 CONTFNUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA^ • © 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 6703 —1(J73 ;CONT[ :UA (C.37•J S:-i;EPT AIA DOCUMENT G703 PAGE 30 or 32 PAGES AIA Document G702, z\PPLICATIOJI AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 12/30/81 : PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 TO: 12/31/81 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: A 8 C D E F G 11 ITEM No. DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED VALUE WORK COMPLETLD I TOTAl. COMI'ItIED AND STORED TO TODATE(C—G) (D+ % (G±C) BALANCE TO FINISH F;tTAINAGC PreviousDATE Applications This App ication Work in Place Stored Materials (not in Dor E) C.O. ;:=48 2,122.77 2,122.77 2,122.77 100 212.28 C.O. ;149 2,338.57 2,338.57 2,338.57 100 _ 233.36 C.O. # 50 C.O. 1i51 . C.O. # 52 , 1,302.63 1,302.63 1,302.63 .100 130.25 C.O. 1153 . 1.832.38 1,832.38 1,832.38 100 183.24 C.O. 754 1;663.38 1,663.38 1,663.33 100 166.34 C.O. #55 2,132.40 2,132.40 • 2,132.40 100 213.24 C.O. 1156 2,392.12 2,392.12 2,392.12 100 239.21 PAGE TOTAL 13,784.25 13,784.25 13,784.25 1,378.43 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 3,051,955.753,044,299".15 7,656.60 3,051,955.75 rn 305,195.58 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA' 9 • 0 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF Ago IITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G703 — 1973 t. CCN T rIli 1 r oN Et:E='T r v AIA DOCUMENT G703 31 PAtd AIA Document G702, APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing PContractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations below, amounts arc stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ac - CO 01 r-- 03 W APPLICATION NUMBER: 21 APPLICATION DATE: 1 2/30/81 PERIOD FROM: 12/10/81 10: 12/31/81 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: A 13 C D 1E I F G I i 1 ITEM No DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED VALUE WORK COMPLETED 'TOTAL C(?.ti11'lf tEl.7 AND OMI11 TO TO DATE (D+E+F) ToBALD.(t (G=C) ;:(r -,•:AGE FINISH IC Gi ) 1 ; Previous Applications This Application Workin Place Stored Materials (not in D or E) C.0.=57 4,594.21 4,594.21 4,594.21 100 459.42! C.0.f53 2,954.70 2,954.70 2,954.70 100 295.471 C.0.'=59 4,691.86 4,691.86 4,691.86 100 469.1?! C.0.1'60 5,232.05 4,185.65 1,046.41 5,232.06 100 523.211 395.53 C.0.61 3,955.26 3,955.26 3,955.26 100 C.0.'62 11,010.12 11,010.12 11,010.12 100 1,101.011 56.901 C.0.#64;. 559.03 569.03 569.03 100 C.0.#65 •• 4,570.66 4,570.66 4,570.66 100 457.07 C.O.#66 5,172,99 5,172.99 5,172.99 100 517.30` C.O. 467 1,890.88 1,890.88 1,890.88 100 189.09] 13,370.68j 5,281.06 * PIPE REPAIR, ETC. T & r ITEMS 1,3,5 & 12 (CP74) 133,706.77 103,331.60 52,810.56 42,385.55 T & m 30,375.17 10,425.01 133,706.77 , 52,810.56 C.O. '=68 3,046,24 3,046.24 3,046.24 100 304.621 • C.O. #69 (178.95) (178.95) (178.95) 100 t (17.90' PME TOTAL 234,026.35 192,179.TO 41,846.59 1234,026.39 [ 23,402.641 TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL 3,285,982.1L 3,236,478.95 49,503.19 ,285,982.14 X328,598.21 AIA DOCUMENT G703 • CONTINUATION SHEET • APRIL 1978 EDITION • AIA' • 0 1978 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.V✓., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20406 6733 —1:73 CONTINUATION SI-i[ET AIA fOCLA4FNT G703 32 32 AIA Document G702, APPLICATION ANI) CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT, containing Contractor's signed Certification is attached. In tabulations bei. -\v, amounts ate stated to the nearest dollar. Use Column 1 on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ANTIC::\I ION APi'LICAIION DATE: PERIUD FRO,\1: TO: ARCI IITFC:1'S I'ROII_C.T .NO: 21 12/30/8101 12/10/81 3 123363/8 A II C f) E f (t I I Iti�1 No. DESCRIPTION (0 \\'ORK SCIIIDIiLED VALUE WORK CO\11'I.I.IEI) OI:\l. t.r).�11'ILII1) _ ti M. 1\r ; r,. (.� : C. • i('' I I\r , a This Application AND S1ORED Previous Applications Work in Place Stored Materials ' TO DATE tD•I-E-I I, putt in D or El * CHANGE PROPOSAL Num._ '546.83 546.83• i 546.83 100 j 54.631 • j • • FEB 17 1982 PAGE TOTAL 546.83 546.83 546.83 I 54.68' ! TOTAL OR SUB TOTAL '3,286,528.97 3,237,025.78 49,503.19 Ain nr7ct:.MINI G:01 • CON ft\I•:\ETON SIM E • APRII. 19715 [D17ION • AIA? • ^ 1970 1111 1'.1I.F:ICAN I;:cJITUIL Or ARChi11(:Pi, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASI'NG ION, D.C. 20006 3,286,528.97 328,652.90: G703 —.1973 890K 48 p; 927 F E B 171982 MENTAL HEALTH BOARD NO. 9 Chairman Scurlock announced that there were three people available for the position on Mental Health Board 'No. 9: Mrs. Fitzgerald, Mr. Richey, and Mr. Berry. Commissioner Lyons nominated Mrs. Fitzgerald. Commissioner Fletcher nominated Mr. Richey. On Motion made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously closed the nominations. A roll call vote was taken, as follows: Commissioner Bird - Mr. Richey Commissioner Fletcher - Mr. Richey Commissioner Lyons - Mrs. Fitzgerald Chairman Scurlock - Mr. Richey Commissioner Wodtke - Mr. Richey The Board elected Daniel LJ. Richey to the Mental Health Board No. 9. FINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chairman Scurlock advised that the Board had received resumes from the following people to serve on the Finance Advisory Committee: Mr. Stone, Mr. Minotty, Mr. Lancaster, and Mr. Putnam. Motion was made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by Commissioner Bird, to approve appointments of Messrs. Stone, Minotty, Lancaster and Putnam for the Finance Advisory Committee. Lengthy discussion followed. It was determined that the members of this committee must be residents of this County, and Mr. Stone does not live in the County. It was pointed out that Mr. Lancaster has a conflict of interest, and did not have diversified experience. Commissioner Wodtke withdrew his Motion. Commissioner Bird withdrew his second. Chairman Scurlock stated that they must approach the next year in terms of whether to stay with the present auditing firms, and whether a financial advisor should be sought for the County. He noted that he would like specific tasks assigned to the people in the committee. Commissioner Lyons agreed that if a good man was found, the Board should put him to work. On Motion made by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved Joseph Minotty to the Finance Advisory Committee. The Board then decided to review the other names. Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, that the Board appoint Harold Putnam to the Finance Advisory Committee. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried with a vote of 3 to 2, with Commissioner Wodtke and Commissioner Bird voting in opposition._ On Motion by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously approved making the terms for one year in the Finance Advisory Committee. Commissioner Wodtke suggested that Ross Stone be appointed, with the understanding that he make a genuine effort to move to the County. Commissioner Lyons suggested appointing Mr. Stone for one year as an advisor. Commissioner Bird stated that he would like to leave Mr. Stone's resume active until he moves into the County. Some discussion followed, and Chairman Scurlock then asked the Press to help the Board solicit members for the Finance Advisory Committee. 48 PI.Gr 92g FEB 171982 67 FEB 171982 . &or 48 114 929 7 SCENIC ROADS & TRAILS COMMITTEE Commissioner Lyons suggested having an Ad Hoc Committee to make recommendations for Jungle Trail. He then reviewed the following outline of duties and responsibilities for those who will be working towards the development of scenic roads and trails: February 17, 1982 Ad Hoc Committee to make Recommendation for Jungle Trail Jeannette Lier Anne Michael Harry Hauth John Morrison Ruth Stanbridge Planning Dept.. .,9 1. Committee to be disbanded when Commission feels work is done. 2. Chairman, Ruth Stanbridge. 3. Chairman has the right to appoint sub-comiltittees . 4. Work to be completed at all reasonable speed. 5. Charter: a. Recommend physical limits of Trail b. Recommend area to be subject to road maintenance c. Recommend. area to be subject to road improvement d. Recommend plan for protection of portion of road adjacent to river e. Recommend any improvements on County property adjacent to road - Recommend method of State or Federal protection that might be afforded Jungle Trail Recommend method of financing any proposed improvements Recommend appropriate marking of area Make any other recommendations that might seem consistent with above aims On Motion made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 82-36 approving Jeannette Lier, Ann Michael, Harry Hauth, John Morrison, Ruth Stanbridge, and one person from the Planning Department to serve as ex officio member of the Ad Hoc Committee for the Preservation and Restoration of Jungle Trail. Resolution 82-36 will be made a part of the Minutes when received. ANNEXATION LEGISLATION On Motion made by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 82-37 regarding the proposed Annexation Legislation, FEB 171982 Rpoi PAGE 930 FEB 171982 Nor.. 48 F/.CF 9:31 RESOLUTION NO. 82-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IN OPPOSITION TO THE PASSAGE OF HOUSE BILL 680, SENATE BILL 579 AND HOUSE BILL 645. WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the various counties to plan for and provide necessary urban services to the unincor- porated portions of counties within the State of Florida, and WHEREAS, the planning necessary to accomplish this goal must be done many years in advance to accommodate the growth pattern now prevalent in southeast Florida, and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 579 House Bill 680 if adopted will frustrate attempts by counties to plan for future orderly growth, and WHEREAS, under current law areas sought to be voluntarily annexed must be contiguous to the municipal limits thereby assuring .t1 that annexations will occur in an orderly sequential pattern, and WHEREAS, the proposed bills delete the requirement that the property be contiguous as long as the area is within an annexa- tion reserve area that may be established and defined by municipal ordinance or other legally binding agreement, and WHEREAS, the proposal does not define or limit munici- pality's power to designate any property whatsoever as being within the city's reserve area, and IF these proposals become law, it will allow municipali- ties to annex areas that are not coterminous with the city limits, creating county pockets, enclaves and defeating the current purpose of fostering orderly annexations of unincorporated areas, and WHEREAS, these amendments will impede the County's ability to plan for future development under the local government Comprehensive Planning Act of 1975, and WHEREAS, House Bill 645 is an attempt to weaken the notice required to be published by a municipality to inform inter- ested residents of the city's annexation activities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY that; 1. Indian River County opposes the passage of House Bill 680, Senate Bill 579 and House Bill 645. 2. The legislators of the State of Florida are urged to defeat the passage of these three bills. 3. The Boards of County Commissioners of the other counties in the State of Florida are requested to make their opinion known regarding House Bill 645, House Bill 680 and Senate Bill 579. 4. That a copy of this resolution be presented to each member of the Indian River County legislative delegation and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners of each county in the State of Florida. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Fletcher who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lyons and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Vice -Chairman A. Grover Fletcher Aye Commissioner Patrick B. Lyons Aye Commissioner William C. Wodtke, Jr. Aye Commissioner Dick Bird Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 17th day of Attest: reda Wright Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGA SUFFI.IEN Y By GA M r BRANDENBUR Cnt Attorne FEB 171982 February , 1982. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF IN IAN RIVER COUNTY, FLOIDA By -2- DON C. SCURLOCK, JR. Chairman ,o0„ 48 Fk E932 FEB 171982 NOK 48 Ka 9.33 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE Commissioner Fletcher reported to the Board that the Committee is moving along as planned. SALARY SURVEY Commissioner Lyons initiated a brief discussion of plans for a Wage and Salary Survey before budget time. He wanted to be sure that any wage and salary considerations would be based on these surveys. The Administrator stated that they would make a complete study of this before any recommendations were made to the Board. Commissioner Lyons inquired what the basis was of his study. The Administrator`reported that they do not have a plan at this time but do have a person they can hire to help them. Chairman Scurlock interjected that he was very impressed with Nick Pellegrini, who previously had done some work for the County. The Board discussed having specific recommendations made to them regarding the cost of the survey and the persons hired to work on the survey. They did not want to approve funds for this project unless it was well substantiated. The Administrator stated that a lot of the work could be done in-house. Chairman Scurlock stated that he did not like to have the work done internally. Commissioner Wodtke interjected that it would be helpful to get with the Constitutional Officers and try to formalize the survey. William Koolage commented that the County does have competition with the School Board and the Hospital and suggested working with the City. Mr. Nelson advised that the County could not compete with the City's pay scale. After some discussion, it was determined that the County Administrator would make a report to the Board in March on the wage and salary survey. MARINE ISLAND ADVISORY COMMITTEE & RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT Commissioner Wodtke stated that the minutes from the February llth meeting of the Marine Island Advisory Committee have not yet been prepared, but -the following memorandum might prove helpful: TO: Commissioner Bill Wodtke DATE:February 16, 1982 FILE: SUBJECT: Spoil Island FROM: REFERENCES: Tommy Thomas Community Services Director A joint meeting of the Indian River County Marine Advisory Commission and the County Recreation Committee was held at the Administration Building on Thursday, February 11, 1982 and started at 3:05 P.M. Eighteen members and vistors, including the Press were present. Mr. Wodtke and Mr. Joe Earman (Mr. Earman is also a member of FIND) discussed placing the proper marker and plaque at "Jop S..Earman Island". Tommy Thomas offered the following motion; To request from the Board of County Commissioners authority to place a reinforced concrete pillar, not to exceed in size of 20" by 20" and sufficient dept to secure it. Money which has already been appropriated by FIND is to be used to erect this monument. Motion was 2nd by Pat Lyons and approved unanimously. Mr. Earman suggested that the Advisory Commission recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that they request sufficient funds from FIND to conduct a land and water survey of Fritz Island. Pat Lyons made this in the form of a motion, ft was 2nd by Roy Hair and approved unanimously. Tommy Thomas recommended in the form of a motion that the Chairman be given authority to designate one or two members to go to Tall- ahassee to discuss a Management Agreement (and/or lease) with the Department of Natural Resources for the lease of the additional Spoil Island under their control. It was 2nd by Roy Hair and app- roved unanimously. Mr. McLaughlin and Mr. Wheaton (visitors) raised the objection to developing any parks on the Spoil Island until - adequate planning and police protection is provided. Mr. Dan Fleichman (visitor) replied that this is a negative approach and that it is the American Heritage to develope and then protect. FEB 171982 73 , aonF 48 `= ;[93c 4 FEB 171982 8,00 Terry Goff, Mayor of Vero Beach, said that some time in the future he would hope that the City could finance aaposition with the Sheriff's office to protect the Island:''withrthe City of Vero.Beach. sfeht- Mr. Earman noted that there are 300 miles of/islands on the east coast of Florida and that this will be the tirst park. It is a pilot program. 935 Commissioner Wodtke explained the following: the plaque that is to be placed on Joe S. Earman Island; the possibility of considering the Fritz Island area to be made into a park once a survey has been conducted; travelling to Tallahassee, if necessary, to finalize a lease of the Spoil Island; and that Mr. Earman was hopeful that this park could become a reality. On Motion made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by .A Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously authorized the staff to take the necessary steps to erect a monument on the Spoil Island honoring Joe S. Earman; constructed on a concrete pillar with a plaque, not to exceed 20" x 20", using the funds appropriated by FIND. Commissioner Wodtke discussed doing a survey of Fritz Island, and stated that they would need a cost estimate; as well as the -layout and design. On Motion made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously authorized the Administrator to do the necessary work to make an estimate available to FIND for the survey cost of the Spoil portion of Fritz Island. On Motion made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, the Board unanimously authorized the expenditure, from the contributions made by the FIND fund, for having a representative or two go to Tallahassee, at the appropriate time, to negotiate a management contract for the control of the Spoil Island, which will be designated in the Spoil Island survey. FEASIBILITY OF COUNTY OPERATED GOLF COURSE Commissioner Bird stated there may be a need for a County -operated golf course, and asked if the Board would agree for him to work in conjunction with the Planning Department and the Recreation Committee to study the feasibility of possibly using the Hobart Park area as the site for the location of this course. He added that he would want to study the Sebastian Golf Course closely as he felt they should be given a chance to get going and off to a good start before the County considers a course that would be in competition with them. The Board agreed, and Commissioner Wodtke suggested having a sub -committee help on this project. On Motion by. Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commis- sioner Wodtke,.the Board unanimously agreed to have the meeting extended until 5:15 o'clock P.M. in order that the Board members might reconvene as the District Board of Fire Commissioners of the South Indian River County Fire District, and the North Indian River County Fire District. Minutes of those meetings are being prepared separately. The several bills and accounts against the County having been audited were examined and found to be correct were approved and warrants issued in settlement of same as follows: Treasury Fund Nos. 78889 to 79158 inclusive. Such bills and accounts being on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the warrants so issued from the respective bonds being listed in the Supplemental Minute FEB 171982 75 Q1,,h1 48 PL E936 FEB 171982 B"" 48 Book as provided by the rules of the Legislative Auditor, reference to such record and list so recorded being made a part of these Minutes. There being no further business, on Motion made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 5:00 o'clock P.M. Attest: 0Ax,ela__ (AA. Clerk - Chairman