Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-019ORDINANCE 2012-019 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONCERNING AN AMENDMENT TO ITS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs); PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 910, CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND CHAPTER 952, TRAFFIC; BY AMENDING DETERMINATION OF CONCURRENCY, COMPONENTS SECTION 910.09; BY AMENDING TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REGULATIONS SECTION 952.07, AND BY AMENDING ACCESS CONTROL REGULATIONS SECTION 952.12, BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; CODIFICATION; SEVERABILITY; AND EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION #1: Amend LDR Section 910.09(4)(d), Transportation monitoring, to read as follows: (d) Transportation monitoring. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity on each segment. The public works department and the community development department will compile and maintain capacity information for each segment. This information, as at a minimum, must include the existing level of service for each segment, the existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction traffic volume on each segment, the committed capacity for each segment, the existing available capacity for each segment, available rights-of-way, and improvements designated in the five (5) year capital improvements program. The community development department will assign project trips for concurrency applications to each segment based on the following criteria: 1. Cumulative effect of all single-family permits on a quarterly basis; 2. Staffs trip assignment for a project generating an average of one hundred (100) trip ends or less per day; 3. Trip assignment for a project generating more than one hundred (100) average trip ends per day based on a traffic impact stud analysis and trip assignment approved by the public works department. For each concurrency application, project trips will be entered into the concurrency data base manually for each segment. For projects other than single-family units, trips will be tracked on all segments within the project's area of influence. A project's area of influence consists of those roadway segments that receive eight (8) or more project peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a two-lane roadway or fifteen (15) or more project peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a four -lane (or wider) roadway. For single-family only. , the most directly accessed segment will be considered. On each segment the number of trips projected to be generated/attracted by an Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 1 StFi#e thwugh: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 application being reviewed for a concurrency determination will be compared to the available capacity. If the available capacity is more than the projected demand, a concurrency determination certificate will be issued. If there is not sufficient capacity available, the applicant has the option to mitigate for additional capacity. No concurrency determination certificate will be issued if the demand exceeds available supply. In addition to the manually updated computerized concurrency database, the community development department will maintain an updated socioeconomic database by traffic analysis zone. This database will be updated automatically with approval of concurrency certificates, building permits, certificates of occupancy and other project approvals. This database shall constitute the vested alternative database. Using the vested alternative database and the existing conditions database, the staff will on a regular basis, but not less than once each six months, run the FSUTMS model. For each segment on the network, a new existing plus vested volume will be obtained by taking the difference between the vested run and the existing run and adding that differential to the last counted volume for the segment. SECTION #2: Amend LDR section 952.07, Traffic impact study, to read as follows: (1) Purpose. (a) The purpose of a traffic impact study is to identify the potential impacts of new development on the Indian River County transportation system and to provide information which will allow a concurrency determination to be made on each impacted segment. The traffic impact study will identify development traffic volumes on each impacted segment, identify those segments on which the adopted level of service cannot be maintained, include segment and intersection analysis and identify potential solutions for those segments and intersections on which the adopted level of service is not being met. (2) Intent. (a) The intent of this section is to define the requirements, procedures and methodology for the submission of a traffic impact study in Indian River County and to provide an equitable, consistent and systematic means of determining the future impact of proposed developments while maintaining the adopted service levels on all roadways. (b) Nothing contained in this section shall waive any requirement contained elsewhere in the Indian River County Code. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 2 Stfike tgreegh Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 (3) Definitions. (a) The definitions used in this section are included in Chapter 901. (4) Applicability. (a) The requirements, procedures and methodology for a traffic impact study contained in this section shall apply to all conceptual, initial and final development orders and concurrency determination applications in unincorporated Indian River County. (b) Any municipal jurisdiction within Indian River County opting to have development projects located within its municipal boundaries reviewed under the Indian River County Concurrency Management System for Transportation shall be required to follow the requirements, procedures, and methodology for the submission of a traffic impact study contained in this section. (5) Types of traffic impact studies. (a) Small project (0-99 dail trips). For projects generating less than one hundred (100) average daily trips, trips will be assigned by the director of public works or his designee. 2. It will be the responsibility of the applicant or his engineer to determine and demonstrate to the director of public works that the small project will generate less than one hundred (100) average daily trips. A letter documenting the appropriate trip generation rate(s) will suffice. Individual single-family residential development is excluded from this requirement. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Stfike tkOugh: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPA7-MTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 (db) Large proiect (100 daily trips or greater). A traffic impact analysis 11HL shall be required for every project generating fner-e th one hundred (100) or greater average daily trips. (e) (c) For developments of regional impact or Florida Quality Development projects, the analysis required by Indian River County for the purposes of determining concurrency and level of service compliance may be, at the director of public work's option, the same as the transportation methodology agreed on for preparing the application of development approval required by 380.06(10), Florida Statutes. Otherwise, the required transportation analysis will be the same as that identified for a traffic impact psis stud . (6) General requirements. (a) Submission of a traffic impact study is required for a determination of application completeness, data sufficiency in the concurrency review process and identification of needed traffic operations improvements. (b) The applicant and/or his engineer is required to attend a pre -application conference to discuss the traffic impact 44em&4 "" analysis study requirements, and report outline as it pertains to his specific project prior to conduct of the study. (c) Each traffic impact + + - ��+ ffanalysis study must meet the �1=�-� �""Y"et following submission requirements in order to receive a determination of application completeness. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 4 StFikO thMughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc �.RM90r. TM WA WATATAT 1Mr_T7.WTrff WIN .- -MWAMT.MM_ (db) Large proiect (100 daily trips or greater). A traffic impact analysis 11HL shall be required for every project generating fner-e th one hundred (100) or greater average daily trips. (e) (c) For developments of regional impact or Florida Quality Development projects, the analysis required by Indian River County for the purposes of determining concurrency and level of service compliance may be, at the director of public work's option, the same as the transportation methodology agreed on for preparing the application of development approval required by 380.06(10), Florida Statutes. Otherwise, the required transportation analysis will be the same as that identified for a traffic impact psis stud . (6) General requirements. (a) Submission of a traffic impact study is required for a determination of application completeness, data sufficiency in the concurrency review process and identification of needed traffic operations improvements. (b) The applicant and/or his engineer is required to attend a pre -application conference to discuss the traffic impact 44em&4 "" analysis study requirements, and report outline as it pertains to his specific project prior to conduct of the study. (c) Each traffic impact + + - ��+ ffanalysis study must meet the �1=�-� �""Y"et following submission requirements in order to receive a determination of application completeness. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 4 StFikO thMughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 1. Five(5)Three 3 copies of the completed traffic impact statement of analysis study must shall be submitted to the Indian River County Community novel flA Public Works Department and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. The eew.%aaity development department will distfibu4e- the eepies as 2. The format of the traffic impact statemepA or analysis study must shall follow the outline identified in section 952.07(7), Format of Traffic Impact Study. 3. The traffic impact statemext —of is- study �444 shall include a concurrency determination network form annotated with each impacted segment's average annual daily project traffic and peak hour, peak direction, peak season project traffic volumes. 4. The traffic impact statement of analysis- study will shall include a concurrency determination network map illustrating each impacted segment's average annual daily project traffic and peak hour, peak direction and peak season project traffic volumes and associated levels of service. 5. The traffic impact analysis stud FRUSt shall be prepared under the responsible supervision and direction of, and be signed and sealed by a Florida -registered professional engineer whose area of practice is transportation engineering. (e) (d) The director of public works shall have fifteen (15) days from the date of determination of application completeness to evaluate and determine if roadway capacity is available on each impacted segment as presented in the traffic impact study. (4) (e) The following procedure will shall be followed if the director of public works determines that additional information concerning the traffic impact study is required. 1. If the additional information can be provided by the applicant no later than the seventh day of the fifteen -day review period, the review will be completed within the fifteen -day time limit. 2. If the additional information is not provided by the seventh day of the review period, the traffic impact study must be resubmitted, along with other Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 5 Stfike dxeughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPA7-MTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 required information for determination of application completeness and data sufficiency. (�fes' The appeals process for a traffic impact study shall be governed by the procedure set forth in section 910.11, Appeals Process and Vested Rights Determination. (l Site access for a traffic impact study shall be consistent with the requirements identified in section 952.12, Access Control. The applicant or his engineer is required to provide a site access plan at the pre -application conference. The site access plan is subject to review and approval by the director of public works. This review will be made according to currently accepted traffic engineering principles. (i) (h) Once a determination of application completeness and data sufficiency is made, and the traffic impact study has been reviewed and accepted by the director of public works, it will the approved study shall be valid for as long as the concurrency review process is active for the specific project being reviewed or one year, whichever is longer. (7) Format of traffic impact study. fe—ll-ifed to (a) in order- to sifnplif�' Staff all 4faffle lfflPaet Sta4eMefltR_w'H__be fe1jew the outline defined below-. Fuft4er- definition and elar-ifiemion of the items- jisted in the outline may be found in subsequent seetions. Figunas t"id maps e to be rTla. + � t possible. used to t 7 Letter- f t — iiitT b. List of tables; 8. T ffi .l' 4 'b t' a assigmneat edt,.+.l.+l.tz Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 6 Strike-t#reu& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc zoning, both dress and fnap ferffleA, size of the pr-oJeet a HA proposed 5. T t 8. T ffi .l' 4 'b t' a assigmneat edt,.+.l.+l.tz Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 6 Strike-t#reu& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 (ba) In order to simplify staff review, each large proiect traffic impact psis study will be mquir-ed to shall follow the outline defined below. Further definition and clarification of the items listed on the outline may be found in subsequent sections. Figures and maps are to be used to the maximum extent possible. 1. Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary; 4-2. Title page; 2-3. Letter of transmittal; -34. Table of contents: a. List of figures; b. List of tables; 45. Introduction (includes description and location of project, current and proposed zoning both address and map format, size of the project and any other pertinent information such as phasing and project build -out); -56. Summary of pre -application conference and traffic impact study methodology; 67. Inventory of existing conditions (includes listing of all segments within the study area, source of traffic count data, and identification of roadway characteristics); -78. Trip generation methodology (including daily and peak hour volumes); $9. Percent new trips; 910. Internal capture (used for e* mixed use projects only); 4-011. Traffic distribution and assignment methodology; Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 7 Stfike-threugh: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 4412. Area of influence shall consist of be deterr„in the assigmnefft of + rri 1 1 fi r /G\ + fifty ltri to a i r those roadway segments assigned eight (8) or more project peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a two-lane roadway or fifteen (15) or more project peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a four -lane (or wider) roadway (known as "significant' links or segments) that lie within an eight (8) mile radius of the proiect; 4-213. Impacted segments traffic volumes; 414. Internal site circulation and access needs; 4415. Intersection analysis eh link); (required at Collector and Arterial intersections on significant links, where links are operating at 80% or greater of Level - of -Service "D" and an approach link assigned eight (8) or more proiect peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a two-lane roadway or fifteen (15) or more proiect peak season/peak hour/peak direction kim for a four -lane (or wider) roadway); 416. Segment analysis (optional traffic study of impacted segments which will operate below FDOT adopted capacity) 4-617. Roadway needs (identification of proposed improvements and cost); 418. Appendix (as applicable to the specific traffic impact study): a. Methodology agreements; b. Traffic count worksheets; C. Trip generation, internal and adjacent street capture worksheets; d. Trip distribution and assignment worksheets; e. Computerized travel time study printouts; f. Intersection capacity analysis using 455 the latest highway capacity analysis "Highway Capacity Manual" and worksheets accepted by the Public Works Director or his designee; g. Link analysis/computerized modeling (if performed); h. Other analysis worksheets. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Strike-thrseghi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 (8) Pre -application conference. (a) The purpose of the mandatory pre -application conference is to provide guidance and direction to the applicant or his engineer concerning the conduct of traffic impact statements and analysis. (b) At a minimum, the following topics wi44 shall be discussed and approval from the director of public works obtained at the pre -application conference: 1. The applicant or its engineer will provide a site access and internal circulation plan; 2. Review of the format of a traffic impact study; 3. The concurrency determination network form will be provided to the applicant or his engineer; 4. Procedure to track the project's traffic will be defined; 5. Availability and use of county data as identified in section 952.07(11) county data; 6. Procedures for traffic counts, the location of current traffic count stations, and the identification of possible additional locations; 7. Source of trip generation for project traffic; 8. Selection of origin destination survey sites for determination of percent new trips factor; 9. Traffic distribution and assignment technique and approach; 10. Justification of internal capture factor if different than those presented in section 952.07(17)(b); 11. Methodology and approach for intersection analysis; 12. Methodology and approach for segment analysis. (c) Failure by the applicant or his engineer to discuss and obtain resolution to the above topics may result in disapproval of the traffic impact study or request for additional information. (9) Level of service standards (a) The level of service used in traffic studies shall be consistent with the Indian River County Traffic Circulation Element. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 9 Wike-thFOUglt Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPA7-MTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 1. Level of service C shall be maintained on all rural major intersections and rural principal arterials and rural freeways during the peak hour, peak direction, peak season conditions. 2. Level of service D or better shall be maintained on all other freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, and major intersections during the peak hour, peak direction, peak season conditions. 3. For the purposes of the level of service as specified in Numbers 1 and 2 above, the current FDOT generalized capacity tables will be used or where better data is available, the director of public works may adjust the segment capacity accordingly. (b) When two (2) roads of differing performance standards intersect and an intersection analysis is required, the lower level of service performance standard shall be the performance standard used to analyze the intersection. (c) Segment specific traffic capacity analysis. 1. A project applicant may choose to conduct a segment specific traffic capacity analysis according to the procedures identified in section 952.07(20) and submit the results of the study to the director of public works for review. 2. Upon review of the segment specific capacity analysis, the director of public works may approve a capacity higher than the FDOT generalized capacity or current segment capacity. The approved capacity from the segment specific analysis will be limited to the existing traffic plus vested traffic plus project traffic. (d) The following procedure will be used to track the project's traffic. 1. Traffic attributable to the development will be tracked on all segments within the concurrency determination network and those segments extending out of the concurrency determination network that are impueted to - l level of greater- than five (5) per-eei4 of daily pr-pjeet t+affie or- fifty (50) dail =.t,iehever is lass within the proiect area of influence. Proiect radius of influence is limited to a maximum of eight (8) miles from project. A proiect area of influence consists of those roadway segments assigned eight (8) or more proiect peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a two-lane roadway or fifteen (15) or more proiect peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a four -lane (or wider) roadway. 2. The percent new trips adjustment factor will not be used to reduce the number of trips assigned to the most directly accessed roadway segment and corresponding intersection on the concurrency determination network in the north, south, east and west cardinal directions. For all other impacted segments, the percent new trips adjustment factor may be applied to the trip rate to reduce the trips assigned to impacted segments. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 10 StFike w: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 3. When a project's impacts are such that no roadways are impacted m five (5) per-eent of daily projeet tr-affie or- fifty (50) daily tFips whiehever- is less-, as defined in 1952.07(9)(d)(1)1 then the impact of the project traffic on the most directly accessed roadway segment and the closest intersection (signalized or non -signalized) on the concurrency determination network in the north, south, east and west cardinal directions, at minimum, shall be evaluated for ensuring the maintenance of the adopted level of service standard on those roadways. 4. For the purposes of the transportation analysis, project traffic may be assigned only to those roadways and future roadways: a. Shown on the concurrency determination network; and b. Meeting the criteria established in section 910.09(4)(a) concurrency management system, transportation supply; C. Where an improvement based on a local government development agreement is relied upon to achieve the acceptable levels of service, default on any such agreement by any party other than Indian River County shall be identified as a basis for reconsideration and, if necessary, invalidation of the development order and certificate of concurrency for the development that has relied upon the improvement. ... .. .. MR rrpj"9 0-9 POW I PRIMMr. WA.�� - .. (44LO) Count data. (a) The Indian River County Community Development and Public Works Departments shall maintain and update several sources of data. These data sources are described below. 1. Traffic count data. Reliable traffic count data are not available on many of the functionally classified roadways. However, new traffic counts as well as traffic count data from approved traffic impact analyses will be used to Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 11 MOW thFOUgh:: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 TrafPic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 update the traffic counts in the concurrency management database. It will be the responsibility of the applicant or engineer to obtain traffic count data on those links for which data are not currently available, or as specified during the pre -application meeting. 24. Roadway characteristics inventory. A roadway characteristics inventory wi44 shall be maintained on each segment in the transportation links database. The features inventory will include road segment identification (name of street, state or county road number and termini), existing road and group type, jurisdictional responsibility, performance standard, length, right-of-way type and width, date of traffic count, counted volume, adjusted average daily volume, peak hour, peak direction, peak season volume, vested development volume, existing service level volume, future service level volume, and the segment specific available capacity. This inventory will be updated as new information becomes available and is approved by the director of public works. 3-5. Socioeconomic database. A socioeconomic database will be maintained by TAZ. This database w41 -shall contain pertinent characteristics about the single-family and multifamily population, dwelling units, vacancy rate, and auto ownership. Additionally, the SE database will maintain information on the number of commercial, service, industrial and total employment. 46. Concurrency determination network map. A concurrency determination network map will -shall be maintained by the community development and public works departments that illustrates all roads on the Indian River County traffic impact study network. This map will include those road segments scheduled for completion within the first three years of the FDOT, Indian River County, and local jurisdictions five-year capital improvement program, and those roads scheduled for completion within three (3) years that will be Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 12 S!FikO t:fough: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 built pursuant to a local government development agreement. All future roads added to the map must be approved by the public works and community development department directors. Additionally, the map will illustrate those segments that are backlogged and/or constrained as well as those critical transportation segments which are projected to operate at ninety (90) percent of capacity with the inclusion of vested development. 5-7. Traffic impact study file. The public works director shall maintain a file of approved traffic impact studies study r-epe . The county shall provide information and data, when available, in order to prevent duplication of efforts and unnecessary costs. It will be the responsibility of the public works director to approve the use of data from a prior traffic impact study. (44LI) Procedures for traffic counts. (a) The concurrency management database —shall maintain an inventory of all current traffic count locations and the most current peak hour, peak direction, peak season traffic count. (b) The number of traffic count locations required for a traffic impact study shall be determined by the number of segments impacted to level ' to or-gre *e" than five (5) per-een4 of daily pr-eieet tfaffie or- fifty (50) deAy tFips whiehever- is less based on the project area of influence and the intersections required to be analyzed. The public works director shall have the authority to require additional traffic count locations besides those identified in the concurrency management database for a traffic impact analysis when such counts are necessary to more accurately determine the existing and future level of service on impacted segments. (c) The applicant or engineer may use available traffic count information for all impacted segments from the concurrency management database for a traffic impact statement studv. If traffic count information is unavailable on an impacted segment, the applicant or engineer will be required to make a current traffic count according to the procedures identified in section 952.07(12)(e) and (f). (d) The applicant or engineer may use available traffic count information for all impacted segments from the concurrency management database for a traffic impact analysis study upon obtaining approval from the director of public works. Generally, existing traffic count information may be used when it is less than of e"al to fnefits ell one (1) year old from the date that the traffic study methodology is approved. If traffic count information is unavailable on an impacted segment, the applicant or engineer will be required to make a current traffic count according to the procedures identified in section 952.07(12)(e) and (f). (e) The applicant or his engineer shall provide segment traffic counts by direction as required by the director of public works. Directional counts shall be made for at least three (3) days and include the continuous seventy -two-hour period from 6:00 a.m. Tuesday to 8:00 p.m. Thursday. Legal holidays or other days as specified by the director of public works shall be excluded. Friday, weekend, or holiday counts may Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 13 Stfik@ tlFeugh: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPA7-MTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 be required for churches and other land uses as determined by the director of public works. The data will include a summary of traffic count data by fifteen -minute increments with a.m., p.m. and other peak hours being highlighted as well as the peak hour to daily traffic ratio and peak hour directional split. All data will be subject to review and acceptance by the director of public works. This review will be based on currently accepted traffic engineering principles. (f) The applicant or his engineer will -shall provide turning movement counts as required by the director of public works. These turning movement counts shall be made from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. or as otherwise specified by the director of public works. Legal holidays or other days as specified by the director of public works shall be excluded. Friday, weekend, or holiday turning movement counts may be required for churches and other land uses as determined by the director of public works. The data shall include a summary of traffic count data by fifteen -minute increments with a.m., p.m. and other peak hours being highlighted as well as the peak hour to daily traffic ratio and peak hour directional split. All data will -shall be subject to review and acceptance by the director of public works. This review will -shall be based on currently accepted traffic engineering principles. (4-3Background traffic considerations. (a) For non -DRI size projects, the available capacity of each segment -shall be provided by the county. The effect of the background traffic on each segment contained in the concurrency determination network will be considered through the combined impact of the existing development for which either an initial or final concurrency determination has been issued, and all segments where CO's have been issued but no updated traffic counts have been made since CO issuance. Therefore, only the impact of the development traffic shall be provided in the traffic impact study for the purposes of a concurrency determination for a non -DRI size project. (b) For DRI size projects, the procedure to estimate background traffic -shall be defined at the DRI traffic methodology meeting and will -shall consider the impacts of all vested development, including development vested prior to September 1, 1990. 0-4133 Trip generation. (a) Each traffic impact study shall list all land uses, applicable ITE land use code, size and/or dwelling units. (b) Allowable sources for trip generation rates for each land use listed in (a) above are identified below: 1. The tfip generation rate€efth if land , as identified in the lad River- r + T ' Rate and no,.,.ei4 New Trips Dao Table The Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, latest edition; Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 14 Stfike thFOH& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 2. The trip generation rate from a previously approved Indian River County traffic impact study of a similar land use as approved by the public works director or his desilinee; 3. A site specific trip generation study of the same type or similar land use approved by the director of public works or his designee at the pre - application conference. Such site specific study v414—shall be conducted at three (3) separate sites. The survey data shall be collected for at least five (5) days and include the continuous seventy -two-hour period between Tuesday, 6:00 a.m. to Thursday, 6:00 p.m. Legal holidays or other days specified by the director of public works shall etci be excluded. cncctien e ethef Alternative trip generation study times 1vill bee „",ao may be selected when it is determined by the public works director that collection of data betweee at the above specified times will net result in an unreasonable estimation of the trip generating characteristics of the studied land use. The data will- --shall include a summary of traffic count data by fifteen -minute increments, average daily volume, volume during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent street, and peak hour of the generator, if different from the a.m. and p.m. peak hours of the adjacent street. The accuracy of the traffic counts shall be verified by performing manual counts and comparing them to machine count volumes twice daily; once in the a.m. and once in the p.m. for each day of the traffic counts. All data shall be subject to review based on currently accepted traffic engineering principles. (4-5�4 Percent new trips. (a) The percent new trips factor represents the percent by which the trip rate is multiplied in order to obtain only those trips that are added to the roadway by new development. Thus, those trips going to a new development that would have been on the roadway anyway and are included in the trip rate must be deducted from the total trips. (b) Each traffic impact study will -shall list all land uses, applicable ITE land use code, size, and/or number of dwelling units. (c) Allowable sources for the percent new trip factor for each land use identified in (b) above are listed below: 1. The Y t new trips f ,.t,,,. iden4i fie i the Indian River- !"',.0om. tTrip Rate � r and Per -cent New Trips Data TThe Institute of Transportation Enl:ineers Trip Generation Manual, latest edition. 2. Percent new trips factor from a previously approved study of a similar land use. 3. A site specific origin/destination survey of an identical or similar land use as approved by the public works director. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 15 Strike thFOU& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 a. The origin/destination survey shall collect, at a minimum, the following information: i. Date; ii. Location; iii. Time of interview; iv. From where did the interviewee trip begin immediately prior to arriving? (1) home (2) work (3) retail (4) other; V. The city, area or zip code where the trip began; vi. The nearest intersecting streets closest to the location of where the trip began; vii. Transportation mode: (1) car (2) walk or bike (3) bus (4) taxi drop off, viii. Where the interviewee trip will end immediately upon leaving: (1) home (2) work (3) retail (4) other; ix. The nearest intersecting streets closest to final destination. b. The location at each origin and destination will be plotted graphically on a map and the trip lengths calculated. To determine whether the trip is to be considered a new trip, a rectangle will be drawn on the map in such a manner so as to locate the origin of the trip in one corner and the destination of the trip in the opposite corner. If the interview location is outside the rectangle, the trip is considered to be a new trip and if the interview site is inside the rectangle, then the trip is not classified as a new trip. The percent new trips is computed by dividing the number of new trips by the total number of trips generated by the site. C. Copies of the original surveys and maps indicating trip ends will be submitted as part of the study. All data will be subject to review and acceptance by the director of public works. This review will be based on currently accepted traffic engineering principles. (4-61�5 Traffic distribution and assignment. (a) The distribution and assignment of project traffic shall be made in accordance with the following procedures and in conformity with accepted traffic engineering principles such as those documented in NCHRP Report 187, "Quick -Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters Users Guide." Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 16 Strike -through Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPA7-MTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 1. Use of gravity model as approved by the director of public works; 2. Review of the socioeconomic database which illustrates pertinent characteristics about single-family and multifamily population, dwelling units, vacancy rate and auto ownership. Additionally, the SE database wi44 shall maintain information on the number of commercial, service, industrial, and total employment by TAZ. This information will assist in determining the characteristics surrounding a proposed project in terms of traffic assignment relative to general production and attraction attributes of the proposed development's TAZ, as well as TAZs surrounding the development. The socioeconomic database will assist in making assignments for the project that will be based upon accepted traffic engineering principles; 3. Traffic assignment may also be based upon an approved traffic impact study of a similar land use within the TAZ of the project. Such use of a prior study must be justified, based upon sound traffic engineering principles and techniques and approved for use by the director of public works. (b) The director of public works w44 --shall make available a summary listing of all traffic impact studies within the TAZ of the project. (c) The traffic distribution and assignment technique must be presented by the applicant or engineer at the pre -application conference, and reviewed and approved by the director of public works. This review will be based on currently accepted traffic engineering principles. (4-71�6 Internal capture. (a) The use of an internal capture factor will be allowed for certain types and sizes of mixed use developments per the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual and/or studies as provided by Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). Land Use Combination Range in Sq. Ft-. Inte-M—al Captufe Faetff (PeFGeFA) Off:..o/Do«.,;1 / «o,- «t,.,,, 'ono% weefi4..0 0 oGreater-44 And- less than 0 each land a* 0-ffin-P-M-g-tail-114etel (greater- than Between 250,000 and > 4-5 0 ;In0 ea6h !an Offleem-e-ta-4-44etel (greater- than Greater- than 1,000,000 z� 0 and less than 80,04 Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 17 Strike thFOughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 (48L7) FSUTMS modeling. (a) The following FSUTMS data files wig—shall be available for use by DRI size projects: One data set will -shall include the current approved base validation SE data combined with SE data from all certificate of occupancies issued since the last FSUTMS base update; 2. The second FSUTMS data set will -shall combine the SE data from all vested development with Number 1 above. (b) Upon request of the director of public works, the applicant or its engineer will -shall provide all input and output files from the execution of any FSUTMS runs used in a traffic impact study in ' c -and electronic or map plot formats. (1118) Intersection analysis. (a) An intersection analysis must shall be performed on each major intersection, both signalized and non -signalized, where +'' +' +faffie-eonsumes equal to err a t w6 (2) perFent--ef the FD --T- v lize «l ,.,.,:., . 't level of links are operating at 80% or areat of Level -of -Service "D" and where links are assigned eight (8) or more proiect peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a two-lane roadway or fifteen (15) or more proiect peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a four -lane (or wider). Intersection analysis of a non -signalized location will include a warrant study performed according to the procedures and specifications identified in the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices." (b) The procedure for performing an intersection analysis wig -shall be based upon the methodology found in the 21985 Highway tea"' ; Manual." latest County approved highway capacity analysis. Any questions, issues or methodology other than that referenced in the above publication will be submitted at the pre -application conference and will be subject to the review and approval of the director of public works. This review will -shall be based on currently accepted traffic engineering principles. 1. Turning movements for vested and project traffic will shall be male determined based upon the distribution of existing traffic; and/or Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 18 StFike thFOUgh:: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPA7-MTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 2. As submitted by the applicant or engineer at the pre -application conference. (c) For each intersection in which the project traffic results in a level of service below the acceptable adopted level of service, the applicant and/or engineer will develop proposed improvements to the intersection that result in the intersection operating at an acceptable level of service with the existing, vested and specific project traffic included in the analysis. (d) The applicant and/or engineer -shall be required to provide the following information relative to each intersection analysis: 1. Printouts and worksheets for all highway capacity analysis performed on the intersections or roadway segments; 2. Copies of any traffic counts performed or used in the analysis, including the source of count data; 3. Copies of any signal warrant studies performed in the analysis of non - signalized intersections; 4. Documentation of any assumptions used in the analysis including trip generation data, if not already specified for the analysis; 5. Turning movement volumes and documentation of methodology used to project existing, prior vested and project traffic; 6. Any other applicable data or information. (20j9) Segment analysis. (a) If a roadway segment is operating at or above ninety (90) eighty (80) percent (for projects generating betweei3 from one hundred (100) and f of 4undr-ed ninety .,:.,o (49-9) to more than one thousand (1000) average daily trips) of the available ILevel-of-sService E "D" peak hour, peak direction FDOT generalized planning capacity with the inclusion of vested development; of A or above seventy (70) pereent (for- pmjeets generating be�weea five 4uadr-ed (500) to one thousand (1, aver -age daily trips) of available eapaeity a4 level of sen4ee "E" based on the F -D generalized level of sefviee tables with the inelusion of prior- vested tr-affie, tfanspet4a4ien and the roadway segment is assigned eight (8) or more project peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a two-lane roadway or fifteen (15) or more project peak season/peak hour/peak direction trips for a four -lane (or wider) roadway, then an arterial analysis must shall be performed to determine if the actual roadway segment operating characteristics are such that additional capacity is available. The applicant or engineer wi44-shall submit the methodology and approach of each segment analysis at the pre -application conference. The methodology and approach w41 -shall be subject to review and approval by the director of public works. This review shall be based on currently accepted traffic engineering principles. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 19 S#ike through: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 (b) A segment capacity analysis may be performed to review signal spacing and timing, as well as signal coordination. Such segment capacity analysis shall be performed in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles and techniques using stteh software approved by the Public Works Director or his designee. (c) A travel time study may be performed to determine the operating speed and corresponding level of service at which the roadway is operating. The travel time study mus shall be performed using a computerized recording device that automatically calculates distance and average travel speed. All printouts and graphs from each travel time study mus shall be submitted as part of the study. (Ord. No. 90-16, § 1, 9-11-90) WWM, ... , . •. •.• ,.. •_ MW rssr�- Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 20 Ct-'h: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc C�lR03 �i:��[ �I►•IIIF•�IIL� •, ... F.. ..... I....... • •MRMAMM. . .. • ... . . MA AAA AAA AAA \ ... a , . .. ........ ..M. . . ff . _ ■ - ... mom .. ... OAX • �7: .= F.. ..... I....... \ , • .. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 21 Strike thr-augli Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 22 Strike-Hreughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc AAA 13, MMIRMMII�,M .t ._ ..t - �- • r ... .. l • ... • WATAWATATAILMN • . t1 ... •• ••• ... . �. AIA M IN • . ... OTA AAA Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 22 Strike-Hreughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 Nete. institute of T-r-anspeftatien Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Maffua4, eufr-efA editien shoul xvu.avaa... SECTION #3: Amend LDR section 952.12(1), a portion of the "Access control" section of the Traffic Impact Study regulations, to read as follows: (1) General standards for regulating driveway locations. The following general criteria shall be used in evaluating the adequacy of proposed driveways for all uses requiring approval, except single-family dwellings. Scenic and Historic Road, Section 952.09(3), of this chapter shall apply here. (a) Sites located at intersections shall access onto the roadway having the lower functional classification. The applicant may be permitted to access onto the higher classification roadway if the public works director determines that such access would result in an improved traffic circulation pattern. (b) Drive-in facilities having one window or bay shall have sufficient on-site storage to accommodate a minimum of five (5) queued vehicles, or one hundred (100) feet. Drive-in facilities having in excess of one window or bay shall provide on-site storage in accordance with the following standards: Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 23 Stfike thFOU& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc 0_ ' - , A #. M. _ ■ .. . . AAA EMATATAWN111 Mom. . ......... ... . , � Nete. institute of T-r-anspeftatien Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Maffua4, eufr-efA editien shoul xvu.avaa... SECTION #3: Amend LDR section 952.12(1), a portion of the "Access control" section of the Traffic Impact Study regulations, to read as follows: (1) General standards for regulating driveway locations. The following general criteria shall be used in evaluating the adequacy of proposed driveways for all uses requiring approval, except single-family dwellings. Scenic and Historic Road, Section 952.09(3), of this chapter shall apply here. (a) Sites located at intersections shall access onto the roadway having the lower functional classification. The applicant may be permitted to access onto the higher classification roadway if the public works director determines that such access would result in an improved traffic circulation pattern. (b) Drive-in facilities having one window or bay shall have sufficient on-site storage to accommodate a minimum of five (5) queued vehicles, or one hundred (100) feet. Drive-in facilities having in excess of one window or bay shall provide on-site storage in accordance with the following standards: Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 23 Stfike thFOU& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 Number of Drive -In Windows or Bays Queue Distance 2 8 vehicles/160 ft. 3 10 vehicles/200 ft. 4 13 vehicles/260 ft. 5 16 vehicles/320 ft. 6 19 vehicles/380 ft. These standards may be reduced or modified by the eenununi:ty development Public Works Ddirector or his designee upon showing of good cause. The minimum allowable width of a driving aisle serving a drive -up window, (e.g. bank, restaurant, etc.) shall be nine (9) feet. No curb, machine, equipment or other protuberance shall encroach this nine -foot wide space. (c) Commercial sites having fifty thousand (50,000) square feet of gross floor area or more shall provide for an exclusive access drive at the primary entrance of the development and all points of ingress and egress located on a collector or arterial roadway, not including service entrances. Said drive(s) shall be used for providing access to all parking aisles and shall not contain parking spaces; also, parking space(s) shall not directly access onto such exclusive access drive(s). (d) Provisions for vehicular and bicycle/pedestrian circulation between adjacent parcels and development sites on—aAerial r-eads shall be provided through coordinated or joint parking and sidewalk systems, or shared driveways and roadways. interconnections and driveway or sidewalk stub -outs, or other methods as approved by the public works director or his designee. 1 Access control for security. An interconnection between sites may be gated or otherwise controlled for security purposes, as approved by the public works director or his designee. For example, an interconnecting driveway between two retail businesses may be approved to be gated during non -business hours and open during business hours. 2 Traffic calming To prevent or mitigate the effects of cut -through traffic, or to prevent speeding, traffic calming measures may be applied to an interconnection, shared driveway, or roadway, and may be required by the public works director or his designee. The design and construction of traffic calming measures shall be subiect to approval of the public works director or his designee. The public works director or his designee shall maintain a set of county -accepted guidelines and standards for traffic calming measures. 3 Exemption An exemption from providing an interconnection with an adiacent parcel or site may be granted by ioint approval of the public works director and the community development director based upon one or more of the following staff determinations: Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 24 S« - ."r Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc CelN_RAW M2to CI►.LI Wall a. The interconnection would funnel commercial traffic via a single street or access point throueh a residential neighborhood and create a commercial traffic cut -through within an existing residential neighborhood. b. The interconnection would not meet Florida roadway/design "Greenbook" standards or would result in an inappropriate mix of vehicles such as mixing semi -trailers and passenger vehicles. C. The interconnection would dead end into an existing water body, environmentally sensitive area, platted subdivision, or built facilities and fail to provide future benefits of connectivity with the adjacent parcel or site. d. The interconnection would serve only low density residential developments of less than two (2) units per acre and would fail to provide future benefits of alternate access at or near a major roadway intersection or alone a median divided major roadway. (e) Driveway entrances must shall be designated to accommodate all vehicle types having occasion to enter the site. The following table presents vehicle types with their respective minimum inside and outside turning radii: Type Egress (feet) Ingress (feet) Passenger car, van, pickup 25 25 Single unit truck 35 42 Bus 45 42 Tractor -trailer (40 feet) 45 40 Tractor -trailer (50 feet) 45 45 Tractor -trailer (60 feet) 45 45 Driveway entrances off collector and arterial routes shall conform with the provisions of section 952.12(5) Driveway width and radii. (f) Loading and unloading activities flatist shall in no way hinder vehicular ingress or egress. (g) All driveways shall maintain adequate sight distance, as provided in this code. (h) Ingress lanes: 1. Ingress left -turn lane requirements: A twelve -foot wide left -turn lane with appropriate storage and transition shall be provided at each driveway when the average annual daily traffic (AADT) volume projected at the time of project buildout and peak hour left -turn rates meet the following thresholds: Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 25 StfikO threugti Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 Projected AADT Volume Peak Hour Left Turns Less than 8,000 35 or more 8,000--9,000 30 or more 9,001--10,000 25 or more More than 10,000 20 or more 2. Ingress right -turn lanes: For any project, a twelve -foot wide right -turn lane with appropriate storage and transition shall be provided at each driveway where the adjacent roadway average daily traffic exceeds ten thousand (10,000) vehicles per day, permitted roadway speeds exceed thirty-five (35) miles per hour, and driveway volume exceeds one thousand (1,000) vehicles per day with at least forty (40) right -turn movements during peak periods. For any project, a right -turn lane as described in this subparagraph shall be provided at each driveway where right -turn ingress volumes exceed seventy- five (75) vehicles per peak hour. These standards may be modified by the Public Works Director or his designee where special roadway and/or traffic characteristics exist that affect traffic safety. SECTION #4: Amend LDR section 952.12(10), a portion of the "Access control" section of the Traffic Impact Study regulations, to read as follows: (10) Gated entrances. Gated entrances may be approved if the applicant: (a) Demonstrates that the entrance and gate are located and designed so that: Passenger vehicles, including customary service vehicles, can approach the entrance and gate in a manner that is safe and that does not impede traffic flow on the adjacent travelway; and 2. Passenger vehicles, including customary service vehicles, that are denied entrance may be turned around without encroaching onto the adjacent public right-of-way, and may safely exit onto the adjacent travelway. a. The public works director or his designee may approve a design that allows turn around areas (but not a gated or gate -swing area) to encroach into public right-of-way based upon the following criteria: Separation of at least seventy (70) feet between the gate driver position at vehicle detection point and the adjaee existing tr-a elway main street edge of pavement, ii. Separation of at least fifty (50) feet from the gate to the nearest right-of-way intersection (edge of right-of-way) internal to the project, Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 26 StfiW thrOH& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QPAZMTU8\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012-019 iii. Separation of at least twenty-five (25) feet from the gate to the nearest driveway internal to the project. Separation distances required under ii. and iii. above may be modified by the public works director or his designee based on alternative designs that adequately address factors such as entry -way width and clear zone characteristics, and that meet generally accepted engineering standards and practices. (b) Obtains approval from the public works director or his designee for the proposed design. SECTION #5 SEVERABILITY. If any clause, section or provision of this Ordinance shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any cause or reason, the same shall be eliminated from this Ordinance and the remaining portion of this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect and be as valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated therein. SECTION #6 REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES. The provisions of any other Indian River County ordinance that are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. SECTION #7 INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or any other appropriate word. SECTION #8 EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 9th day of June, 2012, for a public hearing to be held on the 19th day of June, 2012, and on the 30th day of June, 2012 for a second public hearing to be held on the 10th day of July, 2012, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner O'Bryan, seconded by Commissioner Solari, and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Aye Commissioner Bob Solari Aye Commissioner Wesley S. Davis Aye Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Aye Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 27 Strii£e tH�euglr Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance C:\Documents and Settings\tlister\Desktop\2012-019 952 and 910 Traffic.doc ORDINANCE 2012- 019 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY- � , A Gary . Whe r, Chairman .;As y••, 'fir: ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller ••www www •w�./n !i �, B Y : JeJC/.JICCL.Jl1dU 2.')' Deputy Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Alan Polackwich, SK, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS M. Keating, Com*nity Devg4ment Director Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 28 cm,,;je t; -m,• Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:ACommunity Development\Users\CurDevAOrdinances\2012\7-10-12 BCC (PH2) LDRs\2012- 952 and 910 Traftic.doc