Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/2/1983The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, November 2, 1983, at 8:30 o'clock A.M. Present were Richard W.' Bird, Chairman; Don C. Scurlock, Jr., Vice Chairman; Margaret C. Bowman, William C. Wodtke, Jr. and Patrick B. Lyons. Also present were L. S. "Tommy" Thomas, Community Services Director; Michael J. Wright, County Administrator; Gary Brandenburg, Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; Jeffrey K. Barton, OMB Director; Lt. M. L. Reese, Bailiff; Barbara Bonnah and 4_ Virginia Hargreaves, Deputy Clerks. The Chairman called the Meeting to order. Chairman Bird led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA L. Commissioner Lyons requested the addition to today's Agenda of a discussion re the Community Block Grant Advisory Committee ON MOTION b Commissioner Lyons, Y SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously added the above item to today's Agenda. i 5 NOV21983 ���� �� 1. � `� NOV 21983 tooK 55 im168 Attorney Brandenburg requested the addition to today's Agenda of a discussion re the rescheduling of county -wide rate hearings. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously added the above item to today's Agenda. Administrator Wright requested the postponement until the next meeting of Item #17 - Report on Hutchinson Island Resource Management Plan. 09, MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously postponed the above item until the next regular meeting of November 16, 1983. Commissioner Scurlock requested the addition to today's Agenda of a discussion re the shortfall in the cost of constructing the exercise room in the Sheriff's Dept. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously added the above item to today's Agenda. Administrator Wright requested the deletion from today's Agenda of Item 20 - Request by Baytree to address the Commission re North Beach Water Company Franchise. 2 r ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously deleted the above item from today's Agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 5, 1983. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 5, 1983, as written.. The Chairman asked if there were any addition or corrections to the Minutes of the Special Meeting of October 12, 1983. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of October 12, 1983. CLERK TO THE BOARD A. Resolution re Indian River Mosquito Control District Budget'- FY 1983-84 ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk a Resolution re the Indian River Mosquito Control District Budget for FY 1983-84. 3 NOV 21983 5-5 ray N 0 V 21983 CONSENT,AGENDA a PAU' 3.70 : A. Report Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk: Traffic Violation Bureau - Special Trust Fund Month of September, 1983 - $38,965.46 B. Report Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk: Traffic Fines by Name Month of September, 1983 C. Acceptance of Statement of Revenues for FY -83 from Property Appraiser, Sheriff; Clerk & Tax Collector ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously accepted and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk the Statement of Revenues for FY -83 from the Property Appraiser, Sheriff, Clerk & Tax Collector. D. Approval of Annual Contribution Contract for Housing Assistance Funds for FY 82-83 ON MOTION by -Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved and authorized the Chairman's signature on the Annual Contribution Contract for Housing Assistance Funds for FY 82-83. 4 r I iHUD4=1® - - �z l U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR HUD USE ONLY VOUCHER FOR PAYMENT OF ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS i HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRtN' (Voucher Number) SECTION 23 SECTIONS EZ FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED (See Instructions on reverse) 9/30/83 PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY (including ZIP code) AC CONTRACT NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER Indian River County Board of County CommissionersFL29-E132-001 1840 25th St., Suite 5-321 A-3409 FL29-E132-002 Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 HUD FIELD OF-Fice TYPE OF PROJECT (Check One) BEGINNING DATE OF FIRST 325 West Adams St. ,FISCAL YEAR Jacksonville, Fla. 32202 NEW r7 REHAB 7J EXISTING ( 7/1/79 5 Spring pt. , 75 Spring St., S.W. - Atlanta, Ga. -30303 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS. NUMBER OF UNIT MONTHS UNDER ACC UNDER LEASE Request is hereby wade for the payment of annual contributions parable pursuant to the terns ed Annual Contributions Contract for the project and the fiscal year shown above, as set forth and conditions of the above number. in the following statement: - REQUESTED BY PHA `HUD ADJUS?MENTS (Y) (3) MAXIMUM ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AVAILABLE. I. Maximum Annual Contribution Authorized - per Annual Contributions Contract 2. Pro Rata Maximum Annual Contribution Applicable to a Period of = Less Than Twelve (12) Montle 3. Maximum Annual Contribution For Fiscal Year (Lines 1 and 2) 4. Contingency ResefWAccoun& 2825) for Section 23 projects or Project Account (Account 2827) for Section a projects - Balance at beginning of Fiscal Year 5. Total Annual Contributions Available (Lines 3 and 4) APPROVT�1 TE ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS REQUIRED ANNUAL",ti TIONS"'^ 6. liming Assistance Payments(Accowa 4715)- 7. Administrative Fee (see Instructions) 8. Preliminary Administrative Expense - Prior to ACC (Ace&. 401o) 9. Preliminary Administrative Expense - After ACC (Acct 4012) 9,996 10. Nonexpendabie Equipment (Accounts 7520 and 7540) 11. Security and Utility Deposit Fund (section 23 Proiects only) 12..lndepj)Ildent Public Accountant Audit Costs - 13. Total Funds Required - Current Year (Lines 6 through 12) 516,268 14. Deficit at End of Preceding Fiscal Year 15. Total Funds Required (Lines 13 and 14) 516,268 16. Project Receipts other than Annual Contributions (Accts.. 3610, 3690, and 7530) 11. Tool Annual Contributions Required (Line 15 minus Line 16) 440 11f; 0 440.31.6- 408 098 848.414 �. - 9,808 - 6,813 --328,302 - 328,302 - EXCESS OR DEFICIT IN ANNUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AVAILABLE 18. Excess(Amwsn& byuilich Line 5 exceeds Line 17) 19. Deficit (Ancent by ujuch Line 17 exceeds Line S) YEAR-END SETTLEMENT. 20. Annual Contributions Due for Fiscal Year (Line -17mi,tus Line 19) 21. Total Partial Payments Received by PHA for Fiscal Year 22. Underpayment Due PHA (Amount by which Line 20 exceeds Line 21) 23. Overpayment Due HUD (Amount by urltich Line 21 exceeds Line 20) 3 I 340,449 ! 12,147-- 2, 7STATUS STATUSOF PROJECT ACCOUNT (Section 8 Projects truly) t4. Project Account - Balance at the End of f Fiscal Year (Account 2827) (Lige 18I d5. Provision for Project Account (Account 7027) 5 , 2.0 2. 112 a. Increase (Amount by which Line 24 exceeds Line 4) b. Decrease (AMOU & by which Line 4 exceeds Line 24) 112,014 STATUS OF CONTINGENCY RESERVE (Section 23 projects only) 26. Contingency Reserve - Balance at the End of Fiscal Year (Accowtt 2825) (Line 18 or 10% of Line 1. whichever is lesser). ?1. Provision for Contingency Reserve - (Account 7o25) a. • Increase (Amount 1,f which Line 26 exceed^. Line 4) b. Decrease (Amount by which Line 4 exceeds Line 26) STATUS OF SECURITY AND UTILITY DEPOSIT FUND (Section 23 projects only) 18. Security and Utility Deposit Funds Provided, Account 2168.1 29. Security and Utility Deposits -Uncollectible Advances, Account 1168.2 130. Balance of Security and Utility Deposit Fund; Linc zit mins Line 291 131. Accounts Receivable - Advances for Security aric Utility Deposits Account 1127 32. Security and Utility Deposit Funds Available (L;: 3o minus Line 31) - I CERTIFY that lousing assistance payments have been or will be made only with respect to units whichs (1) are under lease by Families at the time such housing assistance payments are made except as otherwise provided in the Housing Assistance Payments Contracts and (2) the Housing Agency has, within one year prior to the making of such housing assistance payments, adaquately Inspected or caused to be inspected (Including inspection of grounds, facilities, and areas for the benefit and use of the Families) to assure that decent, safe and sanitary housing occomodorions are being provided; that all applicable provisions of the above numbered Annual Contributions Contract nave been Compliedwith by the Housing Agency; a -d that this voucher for Annual Contributions has been th examrined by we end to e bast of my knowledge end belief it is true, cancel and Complete. Indian River County /'1 A_>3s, (Name of Public Housing Agency) (Data) (Signature and Tills at Official Autharlsed to Cart/fy) REVIEWED 8Ys (signature) • .a ECK ON 1. _; Overpayment o; S received from PHA . 2. Underpayment ai = certified for payment to the PHA on (enter date certified). so 5T -ray ri Moitl'wlQi'6 n �8d1A7 00i U. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OPERATING STATEMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS PROGRAM SECTION 23 SECTION 8 ® IIPAI�. SEE INTION RtJ� . w STATE CODE 12 TYPE OF PROJECTS) (Check one) EXISTING 01 NEW 02 REHAB. 03 FY ENDING 197 (Check one) 1.0 MAR. 31 2. JUNE 30 3. ® SEPT. 30 4. 0 DEC. 31 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY (including 'LIP Code) Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1840 25th St., Suite S-321 Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS NUMBER OF UNIT MONTHS AC CONTRACT NO. A-3409 PROJECT NUMBER(S) FL29—E132-001 FL29—E132-002 UNDER ACC 190 UNDER LEASE 161 1614 LINE NO. ACCT. NO. ACCOUNT TITLE ACTUAL PUM AMOUNT PART I OPERATING RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES 1 968 010 020 030 040 050 060 070 080 090 100 110 120 130 140 - 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 22.50 260 270 280 290 300 310 3610 3690 7530 8025or 8026 4715 4010 4012 7520 7540 4110 4130 4150 4170 4180 4190 4400 4510 4530 4540 4590 6010 OPERATING RECEIPTS Interest on general fund investments Other Income Total Operating Income (Lines 010 and 020) Receipts from nonexpendable equipment not replaced Total Operating Receipts, exclusive of annual contributions (Lines 0.30 and 040) Annual Contributions Earned Total Operating Receipts (Lines 050 and 060) OPERATING EXPENDITURES Housing Assistance Payments, Prelim. Admin. Exp., and Nonexpendable Equip. Housing Assistance Payments Preliminary administrative expense - Prior to ACC Preliminary administrative expense - After ACC Replacement of nonexpendable equipment Property betterments and additions Total (lousing Assistance Payments, Preliminaty Admin. Exp., and Nonexpendable Equipment (Lines 080 thru 120) Total Operating Receipts Available for the Regular Costs of Admin. {Line 070 minus Line 130) Administrative Expense: Administrative salaries Legal expense Travel Accounting and auditing fees Office rent — Sundry Administrative Expense Total Administrative Expense (Lines ISO thru 200) _ Other Expense: Maintenance and Operation (fur nonexpendable equipment only) insurance Terminal leave payments Employee benefit contributions Other General Expenses Total Other Expense (Lines 220 thru 260) Total Admin. and Other Expenses (Lines 210 plus Line 270) Prior Year Adjustments Affecting residual receipts (or deficit) - debit (credit) Total Expenses for the Regular Cost of Admin., including prior year adjustments (Line 280 plus the debit or minus the credit on Line 290) NET INCOME (OR Dh'FICIT) before provision for operating reserve (Line 140 minus Line .300) � 1 968 1 968 203 328,302 204 329,270 ; 165 266,008 6 9,8b8 4 6,813 175 282•, 629 29 46,641 18 29,706 0 149 1 1,725 0 372 20 31,952, 1 1,435 5 81090 2 2,628 8 12,153 27 44,105 27 44,105 2 2,536 PART If ANALYSIS Of OPERATING RESERVE (All Section 23 HAP Projects or All Section 8 HAP Projects (10, 325) 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 '190 400 410 2824or 2826 7014or 7016 2-84or 2826 Operating Reserve - Balance at beginning of fiscal year covered by this statement Cash Withdrawals from Reserve during fiscal year covered by this statement Net Operating Reserve after Cash Withdrawals (Line 320 minus Line 3.30) Net Income (or Deficit) before provision for operating reserve (net total of Line 310 for all 11AP projects) Net Deficit brought forward from preceding fiscal year (see Line 410 of .Inalvsis of Operating Reserve for preceding14cal year) Total Income (or Deficit) (See instructions) Provision for Operating Reserve Addition (rhe amount of income, if aRv, on Line 370) (A•dut[ion tl.r urun.,ntn/drfIcit,ilnnv,unl.ine-.?7'1.Lutnulhietrr:dlhrurnnuntnnLinr.3.Al) Operating Reserve - balance at end of fiscal year covered by this statement (Line 340 plus Line 380 or minus Line 390, as applicable) Deficit at end of fiscal yearcovered by this statement. if any (Line 370 minus line 390) (10, 325) 2,536 ( 7,789) ( 7,789) ( 7,789) PREPA D BY / tgna e/ APPROVED 8 /SiKnatur �� 9TLE DATE TITLE DATE c- T Finance Director = 10/26/83 HUD -52682 (3-76) NUO 52S'7 Feoruary 1976 ;9e ' z:f 7 J.S. DEPARTMENT Of MOUSING AND URBAN :�EVELOP1.1E%T LOW-INCOME ROUSING PROGRAM BALANCE SHEET PU8�IC-CUSING -!—,EN,:� Indian River County .. LOCALUTv Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 PERIOD ENDED 9/30/83 CONTRACT NUrs18ER A-3409 PROJECT NUMBER(S) Ser /n.�tractr++ns (opt the Rei -enc. IFL29-El32-001 & FL29-E132-002 r -I O 2 Lu _Z J ASSETS CASH 1 1 11 1.1 General Fund (Development and/or Operation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45.341 '_ 1 1 11 ' . General Fund (Unapplied Debt Service Funds) . . . . . . . . . . . . -" 3 1114 Security Delx)sit Fund "-. . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1 1 17 Petty Cash Fund . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 l l 18 Change Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,341 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 6 1122 Tenants . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1124 1loniebuyers . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 81125 HUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . 9 1 127 Advances for Security and Utility Deposits . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 10 1 129 Ot her . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 19 11 1 130 NOTES AND MORTGAGES RECEIVABLE .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1145 . . ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ADVANCES 13 1 155 Limited Revolving Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1 156 Unlimited Revolving Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 1157 Other . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INVESTMENTS 16 1 162 General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 1 163 Homeownership Reserve Funds . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DEBT AMORTIZATION FUNDS- - 18 1 171 Debt Service Fund .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . 19 1 172 Advance Amortization Fund .. . . . . . . . . . 20 1173 Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . 21 1 174 Accrued Interest Receivable - Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 1 176 HUD Annual Contributions Receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 1 177 Deposits with IIUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . DEFERRED CHARGES 24 1211 Prepaid Insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 1212 Insurance Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 26 1255 Maintenance Work in Process . . . . . I. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 27 1200 Inventories - Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 1 1-0 Inventories - Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21) 1 290 Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I AND. STRUCTURES AND EQUIP1fENT 3011400.2 1 `. Nelopnlent Cost .. . . . . . . . 31 1400.3 Leas Development Cost - Contra . 32 11.300.4 Lind. Structures and Equipment . . . . . . . 33 1510 PAYMENTS FOR OF" -'F -SITE UTILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UNDIST'RIBI!TI:D DEBITS " 34 1620 Ineligible E:xpenditules . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . BID GUARANTIES 35 11820 Undeposiied Bid Guaranties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 11830 Lss: Returnable Bid Guaranties - Contra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ADVANCE'S I -OR DEBT AMORTIZATION 37 1800 Advances tions General Fund to Debt Service Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 1870 Less: Refunds Due General Fund frorn Debt Service Fund - Contra . 3t) TOTAL ASSETS 60,848 I/ I tie (.corral I kind In, tide, $ None repre,enting pnoteed, tram disposition of pn,pert> reserved for replacement ul equipment kir cur,uch ether pur pu,e, a, I+r.r,Ided 'it the annual Luntrlhuuun, f ,,1mml,tratwn �+ultrac( NOTE: Accrued annual leave of employees at the end of the fiscal year S 2 , 01 3 • 00 BOOK 55 rw HUD 52595 12 76)� r N O V 2 1983 'ION 55 ?asp 174 HUI) 52595 Pape 2 of 2 PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY T-ebruery 1916 PREPAF#Er T/I�TLe ` h^ DATE APPRO,VZP BY. 1Sigrlu TLE `�_• Finance Director TE 10/26/83 Indian River County BALANCE SHEET CONTRACT _ - NUMBER PERIOD ENDED A-3409 9/30/83 W 2o LIABILITIES _ -'z ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 40 2111 Vendors and Contractors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 866 41 2112 Contract Retentions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , • . . . . . . . . 42 2113 Performance Deposits . . . . . 43 -'114 Tenants Security Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2118 1IUD (Accts. 2118.1. 21 IS_? &_'118.6) .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,147 45 Other (Aecounts 2115, 2117 & 2119) . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . 13,013 NOTES PAYABLE 46 2122 Project Loan Notes - HUD . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 2123 Administrative Notes - HUD .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . 48 2126 Project Notes - Non -HUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 49 2129 Sundry Notes . ... . ... . .... . .. ... .. ... .. . .. . . ACCRUED LIABILITIES 50 2131.1 Interest Payable - Development Notes and Bonds - HUD . .. . .. . . 51 2131.2 Interest Payable - Administrative Notes - HUD . . . . . .. .. . .. . . 52 2131.3 Interest Payable - Other Notes (Deferred Payment) HUD . ... . . . . 53 2132 Interest Payable - Notes -Non-HUD .. ... .. . .. ... ... .. . . 54 2133 Interest Payable - Bonds - Non -HUD ......... .. _ ...... . 55 1137 Payments in Lieu of Taxes . .. . .. .. ... . .. ... .. . .. . . 56 Other (Accts. 2134. 2135, 2136 & 2139) ............ ... . TRUST AND DEPOSIT LIABILITIES 57 2161 Homebuyers Ownership Reserve ... .. . .. ... . .. .... . . . 58 2162 Homebuyers Nonroutine Maintenance Reserve . . .. . .. . .. . . 59 2165 Mortgagors Taxes and Insurance . .. .. . ... .... . .. .. . . 60 2166 Mortagors Maintenance Reserve . ... ... .. ... . .. .... . 61 2168 Annual Contributions for Security and Utility Deposit Funds Provided DEFERRED CREDITS 62 2210 Prepaid Annual .Contribution .. ... ... .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . 36,292 63 2240 Tenants Prepaid Rents . .. .. ... ... .. . .. . .. ... . .. . 64 2241 Prepaid Monthly Payments - Homebuyers . .. . .. ... . . . .. . . 65 2250.1 Investment Income - Homebuyers Ownership Reserve - Unapplied . . .. ... .. . .. . . 66 2250.2 Investment Income - Homebuyers Ownership Reserve - Applied ... .. ... .. . ... . ( } 67 2251.1 Investment Income - Homebuyers Nonroutine Maintenance Reserve - Unapplied . . . ... . 68 2251.3. Investment Income - Homebuyers Nonroutine Maintenance Reserve - Applied .. .. . .. . .- 69 2290 Other ........ ............... .. ... ... .. . . 36,292 FIXED LIABILITIES 70 2311 Permanent Notes - HUD .. .. ... . . . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . . 71 2321 Series "A" Notes and Bonds Issued ... . . . . 72 2322 Series "A" :Votes and Bonds Retired .. .. . . ( ) 73 2331 Series "B" Notes and Bonds Issued .. . ... . 74 2332 Series "B" '.Votes and Bonds Retired .. . .. . . ( ) 75 2341 New Housing Agency Bonds Issued .. .. . . . 76 2342 New Housing Agency Bonds Retired . . . .. . . ( ) 77 2351 Other Notes Payable to HUD (Deferred) . ... . .. . .. ... .. . . CONTRACT AWARDS 78 1810 Contract Awards - Contra . . .. ... ... .. . .. ... .. . . . . . 79 1800 Less: uncompleted Contracts . .... ... . .. . .. . . . . . ` 801 TOTAL LIABILITIES SURPLUS 81 2810 Unreserved Surplus . . .. . .. ... ... . 15,488 82 2820 Operating Reserve - Locally Owned Projects . . . 83 2821 Operating Reserve - Leased Projects . .. .. . . 84 2823 Operating Reserve - Homeownership Projects - 85 2824 Operating Reserve - Section 23 HAP Projects 86 2825 Contingency Reserve- Unfunded Sect. 23 HAPProj. 87 2826 Operating Reserve - Section 8 HAP Projects ( 7.789) 881 2827 Project Account - Unfunded - Sect. 8 HAP Projects . 891 Total Surplus from Operations . . . .. . . 7,699 901 2840 Cumulative HUD Annual Contributions . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 911 2850 Cumulative Donations . . .. 3,844 92 2855 Cumulative Proceeds from Sale of Dwellings 931 2856 Cumulative Contributions by Hornebuyers for Property . 94, '860 Book Value of Projects Conveyed by HUD . . . 95 _870 Less. Contract Payments to HUD . . . ( ) 06 2880 . . . . . Development Cost - L'ndeveloped Projects . . . . . . . ( 1 y % '890 . . . . . . Boole Value of Capital Assets Conveyed to Homebuyers . . . . . . . . . ( 1 12; 543 >h TOTAL SURPLUS AND LIABILITIES 60,848 PREPAF#Er T/I�TLe ` h^ DATE APPRO,VZP BY. 1Sigrlu TLE `�_• Finance Director TE 10/26/83 ROBERT R.DEMPSEY Commissioner E. Approval, of Resolution amending Res. 82-118 - Revision in Concealed Weapons Permit Application Fee The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/1/83: POST OFFICE BOX 1489 TALLAHASSEE 32302 PHONE 904-488-7880 September 1, 1983 INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM BOB GRAHAM, Governor GEORGE FIRESTONE, Secretary of State JIM SMITH, Attorney General GERALD LEWIS. Comptroller BILL GUNTER, Treasurer y DOYLE CONNER, Commissioner of Agriculture RALPH D. TURLINGTON, Commissioner of Educatior TO: Requesters of Criminal History Record Information FROM: Division of Criminal Justice Information. Systems Special Services Bureau Criminal Record -Inquiry Section SUBJECT: Processing Fee Increase This caTmunication is to advise you of a new development regarding the Department of Law Enforcement's criminal history record check program. Since 1973, the fee charged by the Department for providing state criminal history record checks has been $2 per request. In the last ten years, however, costs associated with this program have continued to increase. In response to this situation, the Legislature directed the Department to raise the $2 processing fee to $5 per request to meet the costs associated with the criminal history record check program. This increase will enable the Department to continue to provide your agency with the same high level of criminal identification services you have received in the past. The fee increase will take effect with requests received as of November 1, 1983. All other procedures for obtaining criminal history record check services will continue to be the same. Your understanding of this fee increase is appreciated. If we can answer any questions regarding this matter, please contact us. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 83-104 amending Res. 82-118 providing for revision in concealed weapons permit application fee. 0 1 •• a 55 175 i NOV 2 1983 8b55, PA4178 RESOLUTION NO. 83-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 82-118, PROVIDING FOR REVISION IN CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT APPLICATION FEE. WHEREAS, Section 8-25 of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida provides for the estab- lishment of an administrative fee to offset the costs of proces- sing applications for concealed weapons licenses; and WHEREAS, $2.00 of the current fee paid by each appli- cant directly offsets the cost of obtaining a Florida Department of Law Enforcement criminal record inquiry search; and WHEREAS, the FDLE has announced an increase in the fee for this service from $2.00 to $5.00 per request, effective November 1, 1983; and WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Office of Indian River County has requested that this fee increase be passed along to the license applicant, rather than be absorbed by the general taxpay- ing public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. Paragraph 3 A is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Initial application fee $47.00 +$44779+; which sum includes $17.00 f01-4769+ for fingerprint examination reports by Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and $30.00 for local detective investigation and publication of notice of application, payable with submission.of completed application. 2. The rest of Resolution No. 82-118 shall remain in full force and effect as originally adopted by this Board. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Scurlock who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lyons and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice -Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Patrick B. Lyons Aye Commissioner William C. Wodtke, Jr. Aye -1- CODING: Words in stffuek-thre"h type are deletions from _ existing law; words lined are additions. The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 2nd day of November , 1983. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By, RICHARD N. BIRD Chairman Attest:'J)'0z' O�h", FREDA WRIGHT. Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND L72, FFICIENCY By CHRIS TOPHEW�J. PAULL Assistant County Attorney -2- L_ -NOV 2198 5 1 '60 1 77 2 1993 so..r���$ � F. 911 Emergency System Network Update The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/24/83: TO: The honorable Members DATE: October 24, 1983 FILE: of the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: 911 ESN UPDATE VERO BEACH HIGHLANDS SUBJECT: Robert M. Keatin�FICP Planning & Development Director FROM: Linda Woodard REFERENCES: 911 ESN Update Cartographer WORKB It is requested that .the data herein consideration by the Board of County regular meeting on November 2, 1983. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS presented be given formal Commissioners at their It was recently brought to the attention of the County staff that several continuous roadways within the Vero Highlands development were denoted by.more than one name. Consequently, there was the potential for confusion, particularly in relation to the 911 ESN system and related services. To eliminate this problem, reduce confusion, and enhance the function of the County's emergency services programs, the staff attempted to correct this situation. Specifically, the staff identified those streets having more than one designation and proposed to change their names. The staff then contacted other County departments as well as a representative of the developer, General Development Corporation, and determined that there were no objections to changing the names of the streets. The developer was then requested to choose the new names for the streets in question. ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS After reviewing the street names in the Vero Highlands Development and receiving input from the developer, the staff proposed to change the name of 20th Place, S.E. to Highland Drive, S.E., and to change the names of 20th Place, S.W., 23rd Street, S.W., 12th Road, S.W., and -12th Avenue,S.W., to Highland Drive, S.W. RECOMMENDATION The staff recommends after -the -fact approval on the designated street names. 12 ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously granted retroactive approval of the 911 Emergency System Network Update re changing of street names in Vero Highlands, _ as recommended by staff. G. Budget -Amendment = Disaster Preparedness Grant Funds The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13/83: TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: October 13, 1983 FILE: SUBJECT: Disaster Preparedness Grant Funds FROM: Jeffrey K. Barton, Director REFERENCES: Office of Management and Budget The following budget amendment is for radio transmitting receiving equipment that was to be purchased from the Disaster Preparedness Grant in the 82-83 FY. The goods were not received before the end of the fiscal year, but had been budgeted and anticipated to be expended before the close of the fiscal year. Account Title Account No. Cash forward -Oct 1st 001-000-389-40.00 Communication Equip -all 001-208-525-66.45 Increase IDecrease 745 745 ON MOTION by -Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved the above budget amendment, as recommended by.OMB Director Barton. H. Budget Amendment - Petition Paving Program The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/24/83: TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: October 24, 1983 FILE: SUBJECT: Petition Paving Program FROM: Jeffrey K. Barton, Director REFERENCES: Office of Management and -Budget The following budget amendmerit'is to establish the budget for the Petition Paving Program Fund Account Title Account No. Increase Decrease Transfers In 703-000-381-20.00 100,000 Other Road Mat/ Supplies 703-214-541-35.39 100,000 13 � NOV 2193 PUE I U % N 0\1 2 1983 ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved the above budget amendment, as recommended by OMB Director Barton. I. Budget Amendment - Sheltered Workshop & Council on Aging Grant Funds The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/24/83: TO:Board of County Commissioners DATE: October 24, 1983 FILE: SUBJECT: Sheltered Workshop & Council on Aging Grant Funds FROM: Jeffrey K. Barton, Director REFERENCES: Office of Management and Budget The following budget amendment is to record the expenditure line items on the above referenced grant funds. At budget preparation, we recorded the revenues, but not the expenditures. Account Title Account No. Increase Decrease Sheltered Workshop 001-106-564-88.37 3,250 Council on Aging 001-211-564-88.32 3,250 Reserve for Contingencies 001-199-513-99.91 6,500 Balance in Reserve $468,535. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons,,•the Board unanimously approved the above budget amendment, as recommended by OMB Director Barton. 14 J. Approval of Resolution Authorizing Execution of FEC Railway License Agreement (Continued from 10/19/83 meeting) The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/5/83: TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: October 5, 1983 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners THROUGH:' Michael Wright, County Administrator SUBJECT: FEC License Agreement to Install 24" Storm Sewer Under Railroad at 16th Street ti as FROM: James W. Davis P.E.L%' ` 9EFERENCES: M. o. Bagley, FEC to Indian Public Works Director River.County dated Aug. 16, 1983 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The FEC has requested that the Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners execute a license agreement to allow installation of -the storm sewer on 16th Street. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The County Public Works Division staff and Assistant County Attorney have reviewed the agreement. The conditions basically state that: 1) The Railway must have an inspector on site during the work with cost paid by the County. 2) The County must pay a $50.00 license fee. 3) The work must be performed in accordance with FEC Specs. 4) The pipe is within the FEC right-of-way under sufferance. 5) The County must agree to indemnify and hold harmless the FEC in any damages caused by the work. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING It is recommended that the Chairman be authorized to sign the Agreement. Funding to be from the 16th Street project account and yearly license fee from the Road and Bridge Department Permit account. Attorney Brandenburg explained that Items J & K were postponed from the meeting of 10/19/83 in order to obtain further information re additional insurance cost. The engineers are preparing change orders now and there will be an increase of $165 in the County's contract price. 15 L_ I NOV 21983 J NOV 21983 ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 83-105, authorizing the Chairman to execute the FEC Railway License Agreement to install 24" storm sewer under 16th Street Right-of-way. SAID LICENSE AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK 16 r it RESOLUTION NO. 83- 105 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY TO INSTALL A TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCH STORM SEWER AT THE 16TH STREET RAILROAD CROSSING. WHEREAS, the County is presently constructing traffic and drainage improvements to the 16th Street corridor, which will - necessitate the placement of a twenty-four (24) inch storm sewer beneath the Florida East Coast Railway right-of-way at 16th Street; and WHEREAS, the Florida East Coast Railway requires that the County enter into a License Agreement governing use of its right-of-way for the placement of said storm sewer; and WHEREAS, the County Commission has reviewed the requirements of the Florida East Coast Railway and has determined that approval of the agreement to facilitate the storm sewer installation is in.the best interest of the citizens of Indian River County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the foregoing recitals are ratified.in their entirety and the Chairman and Clerk are authorized to execute the License Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and the Public Works Director is authorized to ful- fill any and all conditions required by the License Agreement, including the annual $50.00 license fee. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Scurlock who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lyons and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice -Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Patrick B. Lyons Aye Commissioner William C. Wodtke, Jr. Aye NOV 2 1983 The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly BOOK 5 !A£ N 0 V 2 1983 55 passed and adopted this 2nd day of November , 1983. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA B /Z,4 � Y RICHARD N. BIRD Chairman Attest:, J FREDA WRIGHT Clerk APPROVED TO ORM AND LEG SUF I By ,,��''''�� BRANDENBUR /Co nty.Attorney -2- L I K. Approval of .Resolution authorizing Execution of FEC Railway License Agreement governing the 16th Street Grade Crossing (Continued from 10/19/83 meeting) ON MOTION by Commissioner SCurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 83-106, authorizing the Chairman to execute the FEC Railway License Agreement governing the 16th Street Grade Crossing. SAID LICENSE AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK 19 NOV 21983 NOV 2 1983 #0 55 rye,, x.86 RESOLUTION NO. 83- 106 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY GOVERNING THE 16TH STREET GRADE CROSSING. WHEREAS, the County is presently making substantial improvements to the 16th Street corridor which will involve an upgrading of the 16th Street grade crossing of existing Florida East Coast right-of-way and tracks; and WHEREAS, the County must execute a new License Agreement with the Florida East. Coast Railway in order to upgrade and expand the crossing, which agreement sets forth the responsi- bility of the County to fund the placement and maintenance of certain warning devices and crossing structures, among other conditions and limitations; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the terms of the agreement are reasonable and that execution of this License Agreement is in the best interest of the citizens of Indian River County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the foregoing recitals are ratified and that the Chairman and Clerk are author izedlIto execute and deliver two original copies of the proposed Licemse Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A." The Public Works Director is further authorized and directed to carry out and abide by the requirements contained therein. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Scurlock who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lyons and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice -Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Patrick B. Lyons Aye Commissioner William C. Wodtke, Jr. Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 2nd day of November 1983. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By RICHARD N. BIRD Chairman Attest: FREDA WRIGHT .__. Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LE U FICI Y By CHRIS PHER J. PAULL Assistant County Attorney NOV 2 1983 -2 - 8Qa!( ?w �. : NOV 2 1983 155 nsdM AMBERSAND AND ROUND ISLAND DUNE CROSSOVERS The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/24/83: TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: October 24, 1983 FILE: Nov. 2 Agenda Board of County Comnissioners THROUGH: Michael Wright, County Administrator VIA: James W. Davis, P.E., �v.. Public Works Director ` FROM: Donald G. Finneyl Engineer Technician DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS SUBJECT: Ambersand and Round Island Dune Crossove REFERENCES: On July 5, 1983 the -,Florida Department of Natrual Resources informed Indian River County that the Florida Legislature appropriated $51,630 to support the County's efforts in dune preservation, pursuant to Chapter 161 Florida Statutes. This grant, combined with $17,209 available from County sources, brings the total project fund availability to $68,838. The project fund by activity focuses on three areas: 1) Dune walkovers - $52,200; 2) Dune construction - $8,889; 3) revegetation - $7,750. Further discussion with the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) regarding the details of the grant brought out the fact that Indian River County would shift the total available funds within the three activity areas. For example, if construction of dune walkovers exceed the $52,200 figure, the County could utilize the allocations originally earmarked for dune construction or revegetation. Under the rules of the grant, the funds must be expended or under contract for expenditure with the DNR prior to April 1, 1985. The Parks and Recreation Committee on October 13, 1983. unanimously approved the location and preliminary design of the dune crossovers at Ambersand Park and Round Island Park, subject to site plan approval and DNR approval. Ambersand Park Construct a standard 6' wide x 70' long pressure treated wood crossover similar to the Tracking Station crossover (without gazebo) and a wood mulch path leading frau the parking area to the crossover. Estimated cost -$10,000. Round Island The local Catamaran Fleet #49 requested a crossover suitable for carrying their sailboats across the dune. They originally requested Ambersand Park but because of a very limited parking area, they have agreed that Round Island Park would be a better location. A representative of DNR has visited both sites and prefers the Round Island site for two reasons, 1) better access and parking area, and 2) the natural washout is approximately 10 wide and very adaptable to the 10' wide design for a sailboat and pedestrian crossover. 22 The design criteria calls for a 10' wide pressure treated wood crossover, 56' long without steps. It is my understanding that no crossover has been constructed to date, in Florida, for sailboat or other small boats access to the ocean. The DNR appears in favor of this type project and the design is subject to their final approval. Estimated cost $18,000. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS If is apparent that a 10' wide ramp over the dune (without steps) makes it very desirable to four—wheel drive and other vehicles to try to get on the beach. They are currently using this access. The crossovers will eliminate their access by constructing a barricade sign on the ends of the ramp, and benches down the centerline of the ramp. The other concern is that the sailboats and bathers be somewhat isolated from each other. Several members of the sailboat fleet have assured me,that they would keep to the south end of the beach, which would reserve the newly acquired north adjoining property for bathing and picnic facilities. The Fleet does a fine job of keeping the area they use at Sebastian Inlet free of trash. They have placed 55 gallon trash barrels with the Fleet name attached, along the area they use. The same could be utilized at Round Island. The Fleet, although a non-profit organization, is willing to hold regattas to raise money and to contribute a small cash donation, or help with labor during construction. RECCMMATIONS AND FUNDING The following recommendations are presented: 1) Approve the location and preliminary design of the two crossovers. 2) Authorize staff to apply for permits. 3) Authorize staff to submit application for release of partial DNR grant funds allocated for these two projects. Chairman Bird reported that the Parks Committee unanimously endorsed the approval of the construction of the two crossovers and were very enthusiastic about the project. County Engineer Technician, Don Finney, showed a few slides of dune crossovers that have been constructed at the Tracking Station Park and Sea Grape and Turtle Trail beach accesses. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously approved staff's recommendations 1, 2, and 3, re construction of dune crossovers at Ambersand and Round Island Parks. 23 NOV 2 1983 x PAU 190a NOV 21983 :. ► r4f190 Commissioner Scurlock asked if there was going to be some protection to keep vehicles off the crossover at Round Island since it is going to be wide enough to afford small boats access to the beach. Mr. Finney stated that barricade signs would be installed at both ends and benches would be built along the center line of the dune crossover. Commissioner Wodtke suggested that concrete slabs -be used in the construction of the crossover to prevent vandals from using the wood structure as firewood. Public Works Director Jim Davis reported that the State is reluctant to allow the use of concrete east of the construction setback line, but he agreed to look into the matter. PROCLAMATION - BAND AID DAY Chairman Bird read aloud the following proclamation designating November 12, 1983 as "Band Aid Day" and presented it to James M. Sammons, Band Director of Vero Beach High School. 24 I RCC L,' -"AT I C:: PROCLAMATION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CO`24ENDING THE VERO BEACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL "FIGHTING INDIAN" MARCHING BAND WHEREAS, the Cotton Bowl Council in Dallas, Texas has announced that the VERO BEACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL "FIGHTING INDIAN" MARCHING BAND has been selected to perform in the nationally televised Cotton Bowl Parade on January 2, 1984; and WHEREAS, the VERO BEACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL "FIGHTING INDIAN" MARCHING BAND was selected from hundreds of applicants nationwide by the Cotton Bowl Council through a screening process which included recommendations from numerous Florida Band judges, a review of performance tapes, and a performance and achievement resume; and WHEREAS, the appearance of the VERO BEACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL "FIGHTING INDIAN" MARCHING BAND on nationwide television will not only reflect the accomplishments of the Band, but also reflect the support of all individuals and organizations of our community; and WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of Florida has designated the VERO BEACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL "FIGHTING INDIAN" MARCHING BAND as the State of Florida's representatives to the Cotton Bowl festivities in Dallas ori January.2, 1984. 4 - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA does hereby designate NOVEMBER 12, 1983, as "BAND AID DAY" and urges the citizenry to participate in this prestigious event both in spirit and financially, by supporting the Band. BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board wishes to express their pride and appreciation to the VERO BEACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL "FIGHTING INDIAN" MARCHING BAND and their Director, James M. Sammons, and all the staff fcr their many accomplishments. BOARD OF COUNTY COP-LtiIISSIOP:ERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. B yTTES- .BY R .' ' ••:'' FREDA L,'RIGHT, CLERK "r (� +y• NOV 21983 25 BNA PAU r NOV 21983 55 192 PROCLAMATION - SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA WEEK Chairman Bird read aloud the following proclamation designating November 13-19, 1983 as "School Library Media Week" and presented it to William Marine, Media Director, Indian River County School Board. 26 P ROCLAP-IAT I CN WHEREAS, the quest for knowledge by school children in Indian River County is stimulated and developed through the use of educational resources and services provided by SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA programs,; and WHEREAS, SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA programs provide accessibility to a wide variety of necessary educational materials such as books, films, records, tapes, instructional television, and computer software, as well as the equipment needed for their utilization; and WHEREAS, SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA programs provide learning activities designed to enhance reading motivation and to establish the information skills necessary for lifelong learning; and WHEREAS, the- full potential of SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA programs is dependent upon trained. professional library media specialists whose varied skills assist teachers and students in effectively using this wide range of learning resources; and WHEREAS, it is fitting that special recognition be given. to SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA programs and the role of SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA specialists in education throughout Indian River County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of Indian River County, does hereby designate November 13-19, 1983 as SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA WEEK in Indian River County, and encourages all citizens to become aware of the contributions made by SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA programs in our schools. ATTEST: Fre-da trrig::t, clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIA14 RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA RICHARD N. BIRD, CHAIRMAN N O V 21983 27 BOOK 5 FA Q193" r- Nov 2 lass Box 55 PA'U 194 PROCLAMATION - VETERANS DAY Chairman Bird read aloud the following proclamation designating November 11, 1983 as "Veterans Day in Indian River County" and presented it to William S. Stevenson, Commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars and Adjutant of the local chapter of the Disabled American Veterans. 28 M P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, of all the important days we celebrate during the year, few are more worthy of special observance than VETERANS DAY; and WHEREAS, citizens of our nation and state live in freedom todav because 6f -the contributions and sacrifices made by the men and women who served in the armed forces when our freedom was challenged; and WHEREAS, today, more than a million Florida VETERANS continue their dedication to the highest ideals of Americanism to strengthen the fortress of our prized national freedom; and WHEREAS, we can never repay our debt to our VETERANS, for it is beyond any tangible price, but we can show our gratitude for their exemplary deeds; NOW, THEREFORE, -BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA HEREBY DESIGNATES FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 1983 AS VETERANS DAY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board urges all citizens to remember and be thankful of Florida's VETERAN servicemen and servicewomen for the devotion they have shown their community, state and nation. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTES �' : Freda tirigiiL, C l r}: 29 L_ NOV 2193 Richard N. Bird, Chairman BOON S - rnd-95 r NOV 21983 55 PACE 196. PROCLAMATION - FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS WEEK Chairman Bird 'read aloud the following -proclamation designating the week of November 7-12, 1983 as "Festival of the Arts Week" and presented it to George Armstrong, Presi- dent of Alliance for the Arts, Inc. 30 P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, The Center for the Arts will sponsor a FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS WEEK; and WHEREAS, 8,000 or more public, private and parochial students will be bussed to the Civic Arts Center grounds for a stimulating learning experience with a visit to the Museum, in a Tent featuring "Spain and Cultures of the New World"; and WHEREAS, the FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS WEEK will culminate in a full Children's Art Festival on Saturday, November 12; and WHEREAS, the FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS is a gift of the Center for the Arts to this area, and is one of our finest public relations exposures; and WHEREAS, the FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS gives Indian River County recognition as a focal point of culture and art appreciation all along the east coast of Florida; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of Indian River County, that the week of November 7 through November 12, 1983 be designated as FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS WEEK BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the BOARD OF COUNTY CO`'IMISSIONERS of Indian River County commends the fine efforts of the Center for the Arts in stimulating the participation and interest in the visual and creative arts by the young citizens of the County. ATTEST: moi', i /li•. /fir' a �- Freaa ;rric3ilt, c. irk 31 � NOV 2193 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIciN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1,7 RICHARD i1. BIRD, CHAIRMAN N OV 2� 193 PROPOSAL FOR CONTRACT FOR PLANNING SERVICES - COUNTY ZONING CODE The Board reviewed the following letter dated 10/27/83: LESTER L. SOLIN. JR. AICP SOLIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PRINCIPAL AREA CODE 305 PLANNING CONSULTANTS 567.3334 1201 1 Sth PLACE, SUITE 10 1 VERO BEACH. FL 32960 October 27 1983 Mr. Gary Brandenburg, County Attorney County Administration Building 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Dear Mr. Brandenburg: This proposal is submitted as a result of our discussion on October 25, 1983. The attached proposal describes my firm's interest in pri�viding technical assistance to the County staff in amending the County Zoning Code. The proposal also expresses our desire to assist Indian River County in the preparation of any other, studies, reports, or ordinances which may be needed in order to effectively implement the County's Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 163.3201, Florida Statutes. Solin and Associates, Inc. (SAI), has a strong interest in serving the public sector. As Principal of SAI, I personally have over fifteen (15) years of planning experience with the public sector, seven (7) years in the capacity of Planning Director. In addition, in a consulting capacity Iny firm has had considerable growth management experience working with other coastal and barrier island areas in Florida which are also experiencing severe growth pressures similar to those of Indian River County. For instance, during the last two (2) years SAI has prepared Comprehensive Plans and/or Land Development Codes for such cities and counties as: The Town of Longboat Key, West Palm Beach, Sebastian, Port St. Lucie, and Martin County. Solin and Associates, Inc., has recently received professional recognition for their work on the Martin County Comprehensive Plan, when both thi {aunty -and 'Al were the recipients of a 1983 Award of Merit presented by ;:he �(,.Lewide Jury Awards Committee of the Florida Chapter of the American Planning Association. A brochure describing the Martin County Comprehensive Plan is enclosed. SAI's track record is evidence of our commitment to assist local government in managing development options by pr•evidiny highly qualified technical assistance to staff and local off ...is. SAI is particularly interested in working with Indian River County, since we perceive a local conunitrnent to growth management. In addition, Indian Ri :r~ County i� confronted with a myriad of challenging planning issues ul-iderlying implementation of policies within the- Comprehensive Plan such as: the need for an effective plan implementation program; the desire to utilize a variety of impact assessment ordinances for equitably funding costs associated with future growth; the necessity to establish wetland and aquatic land preservation policies; and the potential need to coordinate County policies with the Governor's "Hutchinson Island Growth Management Study". Our firm looks forward to working with you in providing necessary technical assistance in a manner which is responsive to the unique planning needs of Indian River County. Very tr ours, Lester in, P Principal, Solin and. Associates, Inc. 32 I Attorney Brandenburg presented the proposal from Solin and Associates Inc. to provide planning services to the County to assist in amending the County Zoning Code. Commissioner Wodtke asked if there was any maximum set on the cost of the services proposed by Solin and Associates;.Inc., and Attorney Brandenburg advised that the Board could set any limit it wished. Discussion followed as to the proper account to allocate the cost for these services, and Commissioner Lyons felt that if we are saying the Planning & Development Division does not have the necessary people to handle this work, the cost of hiring outside assistance belongs to that department. Commissioner Scurlock stated he favors this approach because he does :not want to add 5-6 people to the. County payroll permanently. ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously authorized the Legal Dept. to contract with Solin and Associates, Inc. to provide planning services to the County at an amount not to exceed $10,000 to be budgeted from the Planning & Development Division. SAID PROPOSAL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK LETTER OF AGREEMENT WILL BE MADE PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN EXECUTED. DISCUSSION RE COUNTY -WIDE UTILITIES RATE HEARING Attorney Brandenburg explained that, they have not received the information necessary to properly advertise the county -wide utilities rate hearing tentatively scheduled for November 22, 1983, and he, therefore, recommended the meeting be rescheduled. The Attorney suggested that the Chairman and other members of the Board get together to 33 r. .. NOV 2 1983 55 PAU1 N 0 V 2 1983 10.09: 55 PUE2 _. decide on an acceptable date on which to reschedule the meeting. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously agreed to postpone the rate hearing and authorized the County Attorney to set an acceptable date and advertise the hearing. PUBLIC HEARING - FRANCHISE REQUEST FOR CITRUS UTILITIES/REFLECTIONS ON THE RIVER The hour of 9:00 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to wit:v VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida _ COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a in the matter off in the r�Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of .h A5 , /�d Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me th's day of � A.D. 19 13_ OeA 'tt� (BU r ss anager) (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian RWer County, Florida) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A public hearing will be held November 2, 1983, 9:00 a.m., in the Chambers of the Indian River Board of County Commissioners to dis- cuss a franchise request for Citrus Utilities, Inc./Reflectons on the River, a multi -family development located west of the Indian River, east of U.S. Highway x1 and north of Island Harbor Road in Sebastian, Florida. The proposed rates for this water and Wastewater franchise are: WATER WASTEWATER Connection-$375.00/unit $375.00/unit 'Base Rate-13.00/month 13.00/month i3al. Rate -1.75/1000 gat. 1.75/100 gal. EXPLANATION OF RATES: TYPE OF CHARGE & DESCRIPTION Connection — Payable at time a certificate of occupancy is issued for a unit and prior to any service being provided. Base Charge Monthly cost of service payable by all units which have received a certificate of occupancy, regardless if service is provided. Wastewater Gallonage Rate Monthly cost of wastewater treatment, payable by all units which are serviced each month. The cost is based on the gallonage used, ex- pressed in thousands of gallons times the rate (minimum of 3000 gallons per month). Water Gallonage Rate — Monthly cost of water which will be paid by all units which are serviced each month. The cost is expressed In thousands of gallons times the rate (mini- mum of 3000 gallons per month). All interested persons are invited to attend. If any person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he/she will need a record of the pro- ceedings, and that for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is 10 be based. Richard N. Bird, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Oct., 25,198& I The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/21/'83: TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: October 21, 1983 FILE:. the Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Terrance G. Pin t�� Utility Services D eer SUBJECT: CITRUS UTILITIES, INC. • FRANCHISE APPROVAL Agreement between General FROM: Joyce S. Hamilton Ci REFERENES: Development Utilities, Inc. , Administrative Ass Stant _ & Reflections on the River, Utility Services Inc. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Citrus Utilities, Inc., is the utility company which will provide utility service to Reflections on the River, a multi -family development located west of the Indian River, east of U. S. Highway #1, and north of Island Harbor Road in Sebastian. Reflections on the River, Inc., has an agreement with General Development Utilities, Inc.,(hereinafter referred as GDU) to purchase both water and wastewater services from GDU for this development. GDU is franchised by the City of Sebastian (due to their being located within the city limits) to operate water and wastewater treatment facilities. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES: The proposed rate structure is as follows: WATER WASTEWATER Connection $-375.00/unit :_$375.00/unit Base Rate 13.00/month 13.00/month Gallonage Rate 1.75/1000 gallons 1.75/1000 gallons It is staff's opinion that it is more cost effective for Reflections on the River to purchase water and wastewater services from an existing system than to build separate facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of franchise resolution. Utilities Director Terry Pinto presented staff's recommendation for approval of the franchise resolution. Commissioner Scurlock wanted to make sure that when the initial rate structure is established, it is sufficient to carry the burden, because if it is inadequate to support the operation of the system and a tremendous rate increase is needed sometime down the road, then this chamber is filled with irate people. NOV 21983 35 Q �4Q( -455 NOV 21983 Aga 5 Director Pinto explained that when they reviewed the rate structure, they tried to carry it out to completion of construction. There is no question that in the early years it has to be subsidized by the developer only because there are unoccupied units. Another consideration is that all operating costs are projected costs; in this case, it is a little better because we know exactly what the water is going to cost them because they are contracting with an operating utility. There will be situations where after several years or even a year in service, we will have to go back and look at operating costs to see if they are as projected, and then possibly ask for an adjustment. Director Pinto confirmed that there is a direct flow through provision in the utility resolution that when a rate increase is addressed by the City of Sebastian, it does not have to come before this Board. Commissioner Lyons asked if they have any rate hearings scheduled now with the City of Sebastian that would affect this, and Director Pinto answered that they just went through_a rate hearing and were instrumental in setting the rates that are going to be charged to Reflections. The legal situation involved with the City of Sebastian is that of selling water outside the city. The County can regulate Citrus Utilities itself, but the City of Sebastian has to regulate the production and sale of water within Sebastian. Commissioner Scurlock asked if depreciation stops at the 7th year, and Director Pinto stated that depreciation does not stop, it just goes on -until it is depreciated out. Commissioner Scurlock asked Attorney Brandenburg about the distribution system and Attorney Brandenburg explained that apparently this line is being considered as an off- site line and has been tossed in as part of the buy-out provision should the County desire it. The Attorney stated that the County usually requires the developers to give all M on-site distribution and collection systems; the on-site is at the point of delivery to their property. Commissioner Scurlock wanted the language contained in all franchise agreements to be consistent.and suggested that the third sentence under (2) on page 11 be deleted: "In conjunction -,with the water and/or wastewater off-site lines purchase, the County shall also purchase necessary land areas _upon which the lines are located at the then fair market value of the real estate." He also suggested the deletion of "appurtenant real estate" in the following sentence and this then would read, "Upon acquisition of the water and/or wastewater off-site lines, the County would then own the entire water and/or wastewater system and would terminate this franchise and provide water and/or wastewater utility service to -the franchise territory." Another change suggested was that the last sentence on page 11 should read, "County would receive easements for all lines at no charge. He also suggested that under (3) on page 12, the first sentence should read, "In the event of acquisition of off-site lines by the County, or the utilization of the County's own plants, the County shall receive the water distribution and/or wastewater collection system free of cost and in good repair, wear and tear excepted." Chairman Bird felt that if we continue to approve franchises throughout the County there probably will be inconsistencies, but each one will stand on its own merits as far as rates are applicable to that particular structure. Commissioner Scurlock again emphasized his concern that we make sure the initial rate structure is sufficient to carry the system and felt we have to stop thinking "developer" and start thinking "utility." He noted that the Board is not singling out Reflections; these are very serious considerations in granting any franchise. 37 NOV 21993 L_ NOV 2 1983 tis ?AFf4 Attorney Brandenburg reported that Director Pinto has ascertained that the agreement between Reflections and GDU is assignable, with GDU's permission. He suggested that we obtain a copy of that agreement prior to the Chairman executing the franchise agreement. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Mrs. Day, 10 Island Harbor Road, Sebastian, resident living on the road along side of Reflections, stated that they are principally interested in the location of the wastewater plant because if it is to be located on site, it would have to be within 50 feet of the shoreline. Director Pinto explained that there is not going to be any plant, just a distribution system, and the GDU plant is a considerable distance away. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously closed the Public Hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 83-107 approving a franchise agreement, as amended in the above discussion, for Citrus Utilities, Inc. to provide water and wastewater services to Reflections on the River including the transfer to Citrus Utilities, -Inc. from -General Development Utilities. RESOLUTION 83-107 WILL BE MADE PART OF THE MINUTES WHEN IT IS COMPLETED At -ED RECEIVED REQUEST FROM ENNESSY BUICK TO DISCUSS LURIA'S PLAZA, SITE PLAN APPROVAL The Board reviewed the following letter dated 10/19/83: DAVID F. ALBRECHT PROFESSIONA(. ASSOCIATION 'ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW PROFESSIONAL. BUILDING 2005 - 15TFt AvENtit•. TF.I.EI'ItONE: (305) 562-8713 Gary M. Brandenburg, County Attorney 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida Re: October 19, 1983 Esquire 32960 P014T OFFICE BOX 21-158 VERO BEACIL. FMRiD'� 32981-2.58" Ennessy Buick -Cadillac, Inc./Luria's Shopping Center Dear Mr. Brandenburg: This letter is to review circumstances and developments concerning the interest of my client, Ennessy Buick -Cadillac, Inc., and the owner of the property immediately south of the Luria's Shopping Center. My clients have an interest in the development of the Luria's Shopping Center and all property adjacent to it. Quite some time ago, my clients took every measure thought reasonable to place the county, all of its employees, its staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission on notice that they wan- ted to be heard on all matters concerning site plan application and approval for the Luria's Shopping Center, the adjoining mobile home section immediately to the north thereof, and the Russell Concrete Road between my clients' property and the Luria's property. In May, my client, Ennessy Buick -Cadillac, Inc, through its President, Mr. Pierce R. Ennessy, personally reviewed and made known its position concerning the Luria's property, with Mr. Bruce King. Basically, my clients wanted to know of any and all developments concerning the construction, approval, site plan approval and development of the above -referenced properties. My clients wanted to be heard and wanted their posi- tions to be known and made a part of any decision concerning development of those properties. Mr. King was aware of these requests and positions,and informed them that they would re- ceive actual and written notice of all matters and hearings to be held and brought before the Planning and Zoning Com- mission -on any site plan application, change or modification. Unbeknownst to my clients,the site plan application was apparently heard and approved on September 8, 1983. Although Mr. Ennessy called the Planning and Zoning Commission staff various times, and requested to be kept informed, and requested notice of all such hearings, he was never notified of the meeting and was therefore not allowed to present his concerns and position nor allowed to protect his company's interest in any manner. My clients have a considerable amount of money in- vested in their property, buildings and overall appearance thereof It is apparent that although they did everything within, reason to place the County on notice and thereafter relied on your em- ployees statements and representations that notice would be given, there never was any apparent input from or contact with, my clients. In other words, the County either ignored or overlooked their substantial concerns, matters, interests and welfare. •,. env 2193 39 " J r NOV19 2 83 5 rAui 20 The first time we even suspected there had been a site plan hearing, or that the site plan had been approved, was when Mr. Ennessy noticed fill dirt had been dumped on the F-1 parcel to within 15 feet of the sidewalk. Through calls and inquiries on October 11th, we were informed the site plan had been approved and that all permits for building and beginning of construction had been issued. Thereafter, he and I met with you and Mr. Michael Wright on October 13th in Mr. Wright's office. During our meeting, we presented our position as to lack of notice in the taking of my clients' property rights and in- terests. My client requested and was promised notice; none was given. The granting of the site plan without notice to my client under these circumstances, especially when a county employee assured notice would be given, constitutes the taking of my clients' Property rights and interests, and affects their property values without due process. Furthermore, the granting of the site plan, because of the dangerous situation caused by the uniqueness of the Russell Concrete road, creates a hazard and danger to the public welfare. The lack of due process and the fact that the allowance of the site plan blocks the view, safety, accessibility, value, overall aesthetics and advertising display of my client's property; is no less a property right infringement even though it is an intangible that is being taken. During our meeting I presented our position that we felt we had sufficient grounds for the County Commission to tempor- arily abate the site plan approval in order to hear and con- sider my client's'position on the issue of the granting of an appeal and the presenting of our position as to the site plan. However, you informed me that there was. little or nothing that could be done because the 10 day appeal time had expired. For the most part, the time in which an appeal may be brought is absolute and final, but those are usually matters where all parties have had their say, stated their position and have had a determination on all of the evidence and facts. In many cases, appeal times have been extended on various grounds such as newly discovered evidence, excusable neglect, lack of proper parties, mistake in the evaluation of the facts making up the final determination, and equity. In informing you that we would request an emergency appeal before the County Com- mission, you informed me that a simple written request was all that was necessary, and, that it would probably be the position of your office that the appeal would either not be granted or would simply be denied. Regardless, and in order to he in a position to exhaust my client's remedies, and to lay the proper predicate for protecting its position and interests, an emer- gency hearing is requested to determine if my client should be allowed to present its position before the full Commission as to whether or not an appeal on the approval of the site plan should be granted, and,•whether or not the current site plan approval should be temporarily withheld pending a full and re -consideration of the site plan. This request is for- warded to you in your capacity as attorney for your client, Indian River County, Florida, and the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners.. Regardless of what the position of your office or of the County may be, my client is currently evaluating its position and potential remedies and courses of action in all matters which have occurred to date. Regardless of what my client's position might be, and regardless of what action may be taken concerning the County Planning and Zoning Commission, the County Staff, the Luria's site plan approval, the Russell Concrete Road, the mobile home parcel immediately north of and adjacent to the Luria's Center, my client wants to be actually and formally notified of any and all.matters whatsoever con- cerning any and all such properties. As attorney for the County of Indian River, you are hereby placed on notice and should accept this letter as our formal request for actual written notice on all such items. All such information and notices should be directed as follows: _ _ �40 Mr. Pierce R. Ennessy, President Ennessy Buick -Cadillac, Inc. 1401 S. U.S.rI Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone - 562-1700 By signed copy of this letter to Esther Reimer, Super- visor of the County Building Department, to Michael Wright, County Administrator, Carolyn Eggert, Chairman of Planning and Zoning Commission and to Mary Jane Goetzfried, member of the Planning and Zoning Commission staff, we are inform- ing all of -them, and their respective departments of our actual written request for such notice. Thank you for your time and consideration. Si nc;erel:y+, I tiavi.d F: Al b�-echt David F. Albrecht, Attorney representing Ennessy Buick—Cadillac, Inc., explained why he felt his client had just cause to be heard in an appeal of Luria's Shopping Plaza final site_ plan approval. He stressed that Bruce King, former Community Development Director had promised to notify Mr. Ennessy of the date on which the final site plan would be heard, and apparently, it fell through the cracks at the time of Mr. King's resignation from the County. He realized that the 10 -day appeal has expired, but felt that this situation was an exception, and respectfully asked the Board to allow his client to appeal the site plan. Attorney Brandenburg explained that he had informed Mr. Albrecht that, in his opinion, the Board could not legally grant Mr. Ennessy's request to be heard in an appeal. The County Zoning Code does not require any personal notice be given and the site plan hearing of September 8, 1983 by the Planning and Zoning Commission was properly advertised. Administrator Wright advised that there would be considerable expense involved in notifying surrounding property owners of site plan hearings. They are considering posting properties in the future. Commissioner Wodtke was disappointed that there is no 41 NOV 2 1983 e K55, ?Au 207 NOV 21993 s: Dom( avenue, short of court action, for Mr. Ennessy Is appeal to be heard. Commissioner Lyons felt that the County has done everything properly and though he does not like the setbacks on U.S. #l, he did not see any possible way for Mr. Ennessy to appeal the approval of Luria's site plan. Chairman Bird stated that even if the Board would grant the request to hear the appeal, he was not sure that this Board would have the ability to go in and overturn a site plan approval unless it was granted improperly, and staff feels it was done properly. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, that the Board deny Ennessy Buick -Cadillac, Inc. their request to appeal the Luria's Shopping Center site plan approval. Commissioner Wodtke asked if there was any possible way . that the appeal could be heard and Attorney Brandenburg also Sympathized with Mr. Ennessy's position in this and wished he could find a way to hear it, but that would be opening up every site plan that has been approved. He could not see rendering an opinion to allow appeals to be heard forever. Commissioner Bowman felt that it was a shame that Mr. Ennessy was not notified, but agreed that the. County has done everything properly. She suggested that Mr. Ennessy's only alternative would be to -discuss this directly with Luria's. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion was voted on and carried unanimously. 42 SPACE FOR NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/28/83: TO: County Commissioners DATE: September 28, 1983 FILE: Michael Wright, Administrator Gary Brandenburg, Attorney Tommy Thomas, Director FROM: Patrick B. Lyons SUBJECT: Neighbors Helping Neighbors Organization REFERENCES: I had planned to ask for reconsideration of our action which could have provided free space and telephone to the above organization. However,, the problem no longer exists since space N is not available. Therefore, I will not ask that the item be • agended at this time. Nevertheless, the situation did raise a question as to our policy in connection with requests for aid to people who contact us and need 'help. I understand that Mr. Wright is going to review and formalize the policy and plans to present it to the Commission at an early date. Commissioner Lyons urged the Board to reconsider their intention to provide office space and telephone space to Neighbors Helping Neighbors. He felt that if the County provided this type of assistance to one organization or agency, it would not be able to refuse another. He suggested, instead, that the Welfare Department refer appropriate calls to Neighbors Helping Neighbors. NOV 21993 L ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously reconsidered their previous discussion in the meeting of 9/21/83 and instructed the Welfare Dept. to place Neighbors Helping Neighbors on their referral list for appropriate calls. 43, Bf #( 55 w 9 N OV 21993 55 fAC1,210'' Mr. Alison De Genero, organization spokesman, stated he was satisfied with the decision. He felt that in order to help people help themselves, you have to stop giving them fish and teach them to fish. REQUEST BY MRS. ELIZABETH PETERSON TO DISCUSS GIFFORD WATER RATES The Board reviewed the following letter dated 10/26/83: October 26, 1983 To whom it may concern: My Name is Elizabeth Peterson, and I would like to meet with the County Commissioner concerning the amount of monthly water bills. You may contact me at 567-7515, to set up an appointment. Thank you, Mrs. E. Peterson Mrs. Elizabeth Peterson, 4726 35th Ave., appealed the high water bills being received by Gifford area residents. She stated that people were receiving $50 and $60 bills and that is only for water`since they don't have sewers. Chairman Bird explained that the Utilities Dept. computes their charges by multiplying the gallons of water used by the established rate. Utilities Director Terry Pinto noted that Mrs. Peterson's bill was for a considerable amount of water, and water consumption is high in that area. There is literature available in the Utilities Dept. office which recommend 44 methods to conserve on water use, such as checking for drips, which could use 100 gallons a day. Commissioner Scurlock explained that the water system is not paid for by tax dollars; it is paid for by the users, and the only relief the Commissioners can give is to suggest ways to cut..water consumption. Commissioner Lyons also felt that Mrs. Peterson's usage of water seems very high for a small family and suggested that we send a utility worker out to check the meter, etc., to try and determine if there is a leak somewhere. Director Pinto explained that the Utilities Dept. does have an on-going program of checking for leaks in homes that are using an excessive amount of water. Mrs. Peterson felt that the Board did not understand her complaint. Itis not the amount of water; it is the rates that are too high. Director Pinto noted that.the minimum charge is $9 for 2,000 gallons of water, and Mrs. Peterson's account averages about 12,000 gallons a month, ranging from 9,000 per month up to 20,000 gallons. He felt certain that there is water being wasted. It was explained to Mrs. Peterson that the County had to take over this water facility and now has to charge what it costs to offer water to the people in that area; i.e., to pump, chlorinate, maintain the lines, read meters, send out bills, etc. The present rates are what is needed just to break even. When the County took over that system, they charged a flat rate for everybody, but because some people took advantage of this to use unreasonable amounts of water, the County then had to charge on a usage basis. Director Pinto still felt certain that Mrs. Peterson was losing water somewhere, and Commissioner Wodtke believed that Mrs. Peterson's water bill should be about $30 a month 45 NOV 21983 rNOV 2 1983 • 5-5ria . ��. for 4 people and agreed that water was being wasted somewhere. Mrs. Peterson stated that one resident of the area has paid bills as high as $600 for one month, and she is here for help for those people in Gifford who cannot afford these high water bills. Chairman Scurlock announced that the County will soon be scheduling a county -wide rate hearing. Chairman Bird assured her that the County would do everything possible to help to find leaks and recommend conservation measures, but the Commission cannot sit here today and lower the water rates. Mrs. Peterson stated that as she understood it, the rates will not be changed today and that they will stay the same. However, Commissioner Lyons clarified that they will stay the same for "today", meaning there was a possibility of an increase in the near future. DEPT. OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT - (CIVIL DEFENSE DEPARTMENT) The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/11/83: TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: October 11, 1983 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Michael Wright County Adminis r SUBJECT: CIVIL DEFENSE RELOCATION REFERENCES: Several months ago, Sheriff Dobeck expressed an interest in assuming control of the Civil Defense Department when Lee Nuzie retires. Mr. Nuzie plans to retire November 30, 1983 and I have deliberately not filled the vacant position of Assistant Civil Defense Director. In addition, there are one and a half clerical positions in the department. I asked Sheriff Dobeck to submit a proposal to the Commis- sion outlining the advantages, disadvantages and cost savings of relocating the department. Hopefully, this proposal can be scheduled for the November 2nd meeting. HM If the decision is made not to transfer the department, my immediate plans are to place the operation under Community Ser- vices Director Tommy Thomas and only fill one of the two positions. The other position can be filled if it's needed and only after a thorough analysis of the existing and future needs. At this point, I have no opinion as to whether the depart- ment should be transferred or remain under direct Commission control. There are pros and cons associated with either proposal and I will be providing you with additional information in the near future. Sheriff Dobeck emphasized` that it was not their intent to imply that the Civil Defense office was not doing a job job. They simply had a study done to see if the Civil Defense Department could be incorporated under the Sheriff's Department, and as a result of that study, he recommended that the Civil Defense Department remain with the County. Administrator Wright expressed his preference to incorporate the department into the Community Services Division under Director Thomas, and to proceed immediately to hire a new Civil Defense Director. He reported that they have advertised the position and have received responses from many good applicants. Civil Defense Director Nuzie informed the Board that there are volunteers present who would like to express their feelings about this matter. He asked that the role the Sheriff's Department would play in relation to Civil Defense be clarified. Chairman Bird explained that the Civil Defense Department would stay the same and the Sheriff's Department; would be coordinating and assisting. Civil Defense in the same manner as they have in the past. He stressed that this Commission in no way wants to diminish the efforts of the volunteers, and Sheriff Dobeck agreed. Mr. Nuzie was glad to hear that Sheriff Dobeck would continue to help because without an active law enforcement agency, there could not be civil defense preparedness. 47 N O V 2 1983 ea 5�as�3: NOV 21983 so 5 ?Ag2.4 Commissioner Scurlock felt there had been a lot of misunderstanding and that the whole situation had gotten out of hand when Mr. Nuzie announced his retirement. He stated that he had received many calls in regard to the possibility of the Sheriff's Dept. taking over the Civil Defense Dept. and he had to explain to them that the matter has yet to come before the Board. Commissioner Wodtke suggested that we fill Mr. Nuzie's position very soon in order to send the new man to represent Indian River County at the forthcoming nuclear exercise which will be attended by people from all over the world. Mr. Wilford Deeds, Civil Defense volunteer, expressed his relief that the Sheriff's Dept. would not be taking over the Civil DefenseDept. He hoped that an independent person would be chosen to fill Mr. Nuzie's position and not a political person. Mr. Needs believed we all owe Mr. Nuzie a great deal of appreciation for all the years he has put in. Mr. Wayne Kroegel stated that he has been associated with the Civil Defense Dept. for the -last few years and has - worked with the nuclear exercises; he continued that he has never seen such a dedicated group of volunteers or a more dedicated man than Mr. Nuzie as a Civil Defense Director. He felt that Mr. Nuzie with his indepth background should be consulted in the appointment of a new director, and expressed the belief that Mr. Nuzie is disappointed because he has not been consulted regarding his replacement. Administrator Wright explained that staff have just begun to evaluate the applicants. He also wanted to explain that they didn't single out the Civil Defense Dept. as they have been going through all the county departments. Apparently, it is felt that this department is operating well. fl n: _I PURCHASES FROM SHERIFF'S SEIZURE FUND The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/26/83: October 26, 1983 Honorable Dick Bird, Chairman Board of County_Commissioners 1840 25th.Street• Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Dick: I would like to be placed on the November 2nd meeting agenda to discuss the following items. Z. The possibility of the Indian River County Sheriff's Department absorbing the respon- sibilities of the Civil Defense operations. 2. The purchase of a vehicle, i.e. (Z) 1984, V-6 S-10 Chevrolet pickup truck to be utilized by the County as an additional animal control vehicle. 3. The purchase of radar units for the Florida Highway Patrol stationed in our county. 4. The purchase of radio equipment to upgrade our current system of communication. Each proposed subject should take an estimated 5 minutes and I would like to have a brief period for open discussion. I believe one hour would be sufficient. Respectfully, R. T. "Tim" Dobeck, Sheriff Indian. :River County New Animal Control Vehicle Sheriff Dobeck recommended the purchase of a new vehicle to be used in animal control and funded out of the Sheriff's seizure fund. It would be turned over to Community Services Division. He proposed a new vehicle costing $8,000 plus radio, etc., and he is recommending that the Commission authorize an expenditure for this purpose not to exceed $10,000. 49 gOJK. 55 21-5- 'L NOV 21983 NOV 21983, ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved the purchase of a 1984, V-6 S-10 Chevrolet pickup truck to be utilized by the County as an additional animal control vehicle; to be funded from the Sheriff's seizure fund at a cost not to exceed $10,000. Highway Patrol Radar Units Sheriff Dobeck explained that Indian River County works very closely with the Florida Highway Patrol and has a very good rapport with them. The Sheriff's Dept. recently has received $60,000 as a result of seizures, citations, etc., made by the -`Florida Highway Patrol in Indian River County, and he would like to recommend that the County authorize the purchase of 4 radar units to be given to the Highway Patrol for appropriate use in Indian River County. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously authorized the purchase of 4 KR -10 radar units at a cost not to exceed $6,000, to be given to the Florida Highway Patrol for appropriate use in Indian River County; funds to come from the Sheriff's seizure fund: Upgrading Radio/Communications-System Sheriff Dobeck explained that he would like to upgrade their current system of communication. At present, the Sheriff's Dept. has 18 hand-held radios and he would like to recommend that 34 additional "walkie talkies" be purchased to allow all officers on duty to be in touch with headquarters when they are not in their radio -equipped 50 vehicles. He felt that the hand-held radios could be purchased for approximately $53,000, with the money to come from the seizure fund. Commissioner Wodtke asked about maintenance and Sheriff Dobeck stated that we have one-year free maintenance and they have experienced very good service on their radios. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously authorized the purchase of 34 additional hand-held radios at a cost of $53,000 to be paid for out of the Sheriff's seizure fund. Donation of Proceeds from Sale of Confiscated Cessna to Sebastian Police -Department Sheriff Dobeck stated that they have worked very closely with the Sebastian Police Dept. and in July, 1981, made a joint seizure of a Cessna "Push Pull", which is in poor condition. They have it advertised for sale in the newspaper and hope to receive $5,000, but will probably only get $3,000. The Sheriff suggested that, since they have worked so closely with them, that the entire proceeds be used by the Sebastian Police Department. He just wanted the Board to be aware that the plane has been advertised for sale and that he has asked the Sebastian Police Department to come back with a proposal of how they could use the entire amount realized from the sale of the plane. APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL $3,000 TO CONSTRUCT EXERCISE ROOM IN SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT Sheriff Dobeck requested that the Board approve an additional $3,000 for the installation of plumbing in the exercise room. 51 NOV 21993 to. 55 rasp 217 NOV 2 1983 ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously authorized an additional $3,000 for the installation of plumbing in the exercise room at the Sheriff's Dept. SALE OF COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY IN FELLSMERE - ERWIN M: CARTWRIGHT The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/26/83: TO: Board of County DATE: October 26, 1983 FILE: Commissioners SUBJECT: Sale of County Owned Property FROM: L. S. "Tommy" Thomas REFERENCES: Community Services Director Erwin M. Cartwright, Sr. is interested in purchasing County awned Lot 153, Block 6, Hall, Carter & James Subdivision, City of Fellsmere. Mr. Cartwright recently purchased Lot 152 and he explained that originally one person owned Lots 152 and 153 and that person built a house, which is centered on the two lots. Mr. Cartwright further explained at that time there were two deeds, one for each lot. The owner only paid the taxes on one deed, Lot 152 and the other lot was foreclosed on and became the property of the County. Por. Cartwright recently purchased Lot 152 from the original owner and he would like to renovate his house but found his house is half on -Lot 153 which he does not own. Should the Board authorize the sale of this property, the next step would be to authorize us to advertise for bids. Community Services Director Tommy Thomas recommended that the amount received from the sale of this property be credited to an account for acquisition and development of existing properties. 52 ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously authorized the advertisement and sale of Lot 153, Block 6, Hall, Carter & James Subdivision, City of Fellsmere. - Mr. Erwin M. Cartwright, Sr., owner of Lot 152, was informed that this property would be advertised and he would be kept abreast of the proceedings. SELECTION OF UNDERWRITER FOR PROPOSED REFINANCING OF $5 -MILLION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS Commissioner Scurlock reported that the Finance Advisory Committee had received presentations from four firms and recommended the selection of Arch W. Roberts/The - Leedy Corporation _as the managing underwriter for the proposed refinancing of $5 million in county capital improvement bonds. Matthews & Wright, Inc. had been a close second choice, but the Committee preferred the Florida firm of Arch W. Roberts/The Leedy Corporation. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously selected Arch W. Roberts/The Leedy Corporation as the managing underwriter for the proposed refinancing of $5 million in Indian River County capital improvement bonds. REPORT ON FOURTH COURTROOM Commissioner Lyons presented a sketch of the proposed fourth courtroom proposed for the second floor of the Courthouse Annex, and explained that it would be a very large courtroom that could be used for every use. The plans were reviewed by Judge Smith, who noted there were no restrooms in the jury room, and the drawings have been 53 NOV 219 55 wE 21.9 NOV 2 )983 I altered to include the restrooms. The Judge requested that Administrator Wright check with Ester Rymer of the Building Dept. and also with the Fire Dept. to see that all building requirements are complied with. Administrator Wright pointed out that with the exception of the restrooms, practically everything that will be used in the courtroom can be salvaged at such time that a criminal justice complex is built. He noted that we want to move very carefully. SPECIAL INSPECTORS REQUIRED FOR ALL THRESHOLD BUILDINGS The Board reviewed the following memos dated 10/25/83 and 10/10/83: TO: Ester Rymer DATE: October 10, 1983 FILE. '-'Director, Building Department -SUBJECT: Chapter 83-160 Laws of Florida Regarding Special Inspectors FROM: Gary M. Brandenburg REFERENCES: County Attorney I agree with the Department of Community Affairs' interpretation. We should establish standards for Special Inspectors by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners and then maintain a list of those who qualify. Not all architects, engineers, etc. have expertise in structural components. I believe this is an area that we must be very careful about. I agree with D.C.A. that the Special Inspector should not be an employee of the contractor. In my mind it defeats the purpose to have the engineer who designed the project to_insnect it. _ The Special Inspector should be chosen from a list of approved people competent to perform structura� inspections supplied by the County. This individual will negotiate his or her fee directly with the contractor, but will report and be responsible to the enforcing agency. We will develop a form where the inspector must pledge his allegiance to the County. Normal inspection, however, must continue even when a Special Inspector is involved. 54 TO: Michael Wright DATE: October 25, 1983 FILE: County Administrator SUBJECT: Chapter 83-160 Laws of Florida Regarding Special Inspectors FROM: Ester Rymer j' ,� , REFERENCES: Building Direc,tort: Effective October 1, 1983, a special inspector is required on all threshold buildings. The special inspector should be chosen from a list of approved people competent to perform structural inspections supplied by the County. I would like to place this matter on the agenda for discussion by the Board of County Commissioners to establish standards for main - twining a list of those who qualify. I recommend that the list be established and reviewed by the Indian River County Building Code Board of Adjustments and Appeals. For further information on this subject, please refer to the attached memo from Mr. Brandenburg. Attorney Brandenburg reported that the Legislature has passed a new law requiring special inspectors to be present at all times when structural components of threshold buildings are being constructed. This is to avoid accidents such as the one last year where an aeronautical engineer designed a building and it collapsed. The Attorney explained that this law requires the County to set up standards and maintain a list of those people that the County 'feels are qualified to do this type of inspection. Director Rymer has suggested that the Board authorize the County Building Board of Adjustments and Appeals to come up with standards of eligibility for placing competent inspectors on that list. Attorney Brandenburg cautioned that the County be very careful in their determination of who is competent to be on the list. In order words, the 55 el N 0 V 2 1983' 'r�. Nov 21983 County does not want to say that all licensed architects or engineers are eligible for the list, because if someone on that list turns out to be not qualified, it opens up an area of potential responsibility for the County. Mrs. Ester Rymer, Building Director, defined a threshold building as being any structure which has a total floor area exceeding 25,000 square feet, or is greater than 2 stories, or 25 feet in height, or has an assembly occupancy greater than 5,000 square feet, or is of unusual design or construction as determined by the building official. There is an exception to this: a residential structure 3 stories or less in height, and any building defined in the Statute which refers to agricultural buildings and single family residences and duplexes. Commissioner Wodtke understood that this would include churches, large grocery stores, and shopping centers. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, that the Board authorize Mrs. Ester Rymer to work with the County Building Board of Adjustments and Appeals to come back with appropriate standards for qualifying special inspectors and authorize in the interim the use of the form suggested by the County Attorney. Commissioner Wodtke felt that he has•a problem with the owner establishing the amount of the fee with the inspector and asked if there was some way the County could establish the amount of fees. Attorney Brandenburg explained that there are diverse feelings, state-wide., on how rates should be established, S Some parties feel that the fees should be determined by 56 private enterprise. There are others that feel there would be complaints that the fees are set too high for the benefit of architects or engineers on the list, while others may complain the rates are too low and don't want their names on the list. Director Rymer stated that since the owner has to pay the bill, it is felt that the owner should negotiate with the special instructor on the fee. All we are trying to do is maintain a list of qualified special instructors from which to select. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. It was voted on and carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF COUNTY TO APPLY FOR TAX DEEDS The Board reviewed the following letter dated 10/24/83: October 24 1983 Mr. Gary M. Brandenburg a County Attorney l� Administration Building 1842 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida Dear Mr. Brandenburg: There are sixty-six tax certificates held in the name of Indian River County which are now over two years old. The County should apply for tax deeds on these tax certificates.. A list is enclosed. The 20 -year tax search fee is $30.00 for each, or a total of $1,980.00. In addition we must collect $12.00, for the Sheriff's posting fee on one parcel which has an improvement. The total necessary to begin the tax deed applications would be $1,992.00. i�nclely yours, 0,*� Gene E. Morris County Tax Collector 57 „, BOCA . V FA91Wz NOV 21988 NOV 21983 ?AGE 2 Tax Collector Gene Morris explained that a tax a: certificate is a lien against the land for unpaid taxes and reviewed in detail the numerous steps that must be followed before the land can be sold for back taxes. He recommended that the County apply for tax deeds on 66 tax certificates which are now over two years old. A 20 -year tax search fee is $30 for each, which would amount to $1,980, plus $12 for the Sheriff's posting fee on one parcel. He explained that these 66 pieces of property were west of I-95 and north of S.R. #60 without proper access and not very marketable, but it might be a good opportunity for the County to acquire some land for future use of some sort. Chairman Bird understood that the process is expected to be held in about eight weeks. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board authorized the Tax Collector to apply for tax deeds on 66 tax certificates at a cost of $1,992, to be funded out of the Commission's Other Professional Services account. INTRODUCTION OF NEW PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR Dr. Carl Brumback of Health & Rehabilitative Services, introduced Dr. Joseph Tucker, Vero Beach dermatologist, as the new Public Health Director. Hegavea brief summary of Dr. Tucker's education and background. Chairman Bird, on behalf- of the entire Commission, welcomed Dr. Tucker aboard. Commissioner Lyons understood that Dr. Tucker intends to continue his studies to obtain a Masters in Public Health in the State of Florida. Commissioner Lyons felt that in the long -run, the County really needs that level of expertise. 4.11 Chairman Bird expressed the Board's appreciation to Dr. Bromback for his sincere concern in recommending a replacement for Dr. Cindy Lookabaugh, who was with us for such a short time. Commissioner Lyons asked Dr. Tucker to please maintain communication with the Board on the status of the Health Dept. and frequently report back on the status of the Department as the Board cannot help if they do not know what is needed. REQUEST TO SET WORKSHOP DATE RE HURRICANE EVACUATION Commissioner Lyons explained he has not received the complete slosh program report from the Regional Planning Council and suggested that the Board postpone setting a workshop date to review the possible effects of a 17 -ft. wave surge during a major hurricane. The Board agreed. REPORT ON EMS COMMITTEE Commissioner Lyons apprised the Commission of the plans for improving ambulance service for the next year. (Also, the South County Fire District, since the Commissioners comprise that Board.) He pointed out that excellent communication exists between the South County Fire District and the Volunteer Ambulance Squad. In every emergency when transportation of the victim is required, the ambulance squad provides it. However, in general, when a life-threatening situation exists and a fire rescue unit is located closer to the scene than a volunteer ambulance, a fire rescue unit is also dispatched. This has been working very well and unnecessary fire rescue calls have been cut to a minimum. NOV 21983 59 5 r NOV 2 198 Commissioner Lyons explained that both_ the fire PACE2,26 department and the ambulance squads have paramedics. We plan to find a way to use their expertise. Through Dr. Frazier, we may be able to establish liaison with the hospitals to expand our service in that way. In the long run we may want a responding unit other than a fire truck, but he did not think so. He believed the next step will be more along the lines of improved communications so as to take advantage of the available paramedic skill. He did not contemplate incurring tremendous new expense to take this next step. That is his aim and that is the way he plans to operate. He asked that if anybody has any different feeling, let hirci know now. Commissioner Wodtke agreed the expertise is there in paramedic training and if there is some way we can.utilize that without getting back into a fire vs. volunteer or paramedic situation, he would have no objections. Commissioner Lyons felt that _the general feeling is - pretty much along those lines and that people realize the significant costs that would be incurred if the ambulance squad was not used. He felt our position is pretty well understood as far as the budget is concerned, and unless anybody objects strenuously, that is the direction that he would take. 59a APPOINTMENTS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/27/83: TO: DATE: FILE: Board of County Commissioners October 27, 1983 SUBJECT: FROM: PatrickREFERENCES: Chairma SV Commun' Y evelopment Block Grant Advisory Committee Please be advised I have appointed the following members to our newly activated, Community Development Block Grant Advisory Committee. This advisory Committee must be established to obtain citizens views on community development needs before submission of an application for funding under the Florida Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program. The appointed members are: a ' Wabasso Solomon Murphy William Rigby Gifford Joe Idlette Walter Jackson Ralph Lundy Victor Hart Sr. Bernice Johnson Oslo Harold McKinney Joe Wiggins Christine Browning Geoffrey Subdivision Ann Jenkins Arthur J. Harris Vero Beach Michael Wright Edward J. Regan Guy L. Decker Jr. Robert M. Keating Chairman Patrick B. Lyons I appreciate your cooperation and understanding concerning this subject. 60 . ?AGE 227 NOV 21993 J r NOV 21983 I 55. PAcE228 Commissioner Lyons requested the Board's approval of the above appointments to the Community Development Block Grant Advisory Committee. ON MOTION.by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved the above list of appointments to the Community Development Block Grant Advisory Committee. NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT Chairman Bird announced that upon recess for lunch of the meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, a meeting of the North" County Fire District will immediately convene. Those minutes are being prepared separately'. 61 The Board of County Commissioners thereupon recessed for lunch at 11:55 o'clock A.M. and reconvened at 1:30 o'clock P.M. with the same members present. WASTEWATER FRANCHISE - BAYSIDE UTILITIES, INC. The hour of 1:30 o'clock P.M. having passed, the Deputy Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to -wit: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says -that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being in the matter of in the Court, was pub- lishevin said newspaper in the issues of v Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed befor e s a of 19 a� (Business Manager) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, indian River County, Florida) (SEAL) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Indian River Board of County Commis- sioners will hold a public hearing November 2, 1983,1:30 p.m., in the Chambers of the Com- mission located at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, to consider adoption of the franchise resolution for Bayside Utilities, Inc. Bayside Utilities is the utility company for Bay - tree, a multi -family development located west of the Atlantic Ocean and also west of AIA, east of Jungle Trail, north of Old Winter Beach Road and south of Wabasso Bridge I Road. The proposed rates for this development are: WASTEWATER Connection charge $500.00/unit Base charge 15.00/unit Usage charge 1.50/1000 gallons Irrigation use charge .50/1000 gallons EXPLANATION OF CHARGES Connection charge — Payable at time a certificate of occupancy is issued for a'unit and prior to any service being provided. Base charge — Monthly cost of service payable by all units which have received a certificate of occupancy, regardless if service is provided. Usage charge Monthly cost based on 80% of water consumption. A minimum of 3000 gallons per month will be assessed to all units which have received a certificate of oc- cupancy. Irrigation use charge — Monthly cost for ir- rigation water (treated effluent) to be paid by all units which -have been Closed, regardless if service is provided. All intersted persons are invited to attend. If any person decides to appeal any decision made by. the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he/she will need a record of the pro- ceedings, and, that for such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Richard N. Bird, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Oct. 25, 1983. Utility Services Director Terry Pinto reviewed the following memo: 62 � NOV 21983 �a€ 2:29 NOV 21983 we r " rkcE 230 TO: The Honorable !Members of�. October 21, 1953 FILE: the Board of County Commiss o TP� THROUGH: Terrance G. Pinto" � 4 Utility Services Director BAYSIDE UTILITIES, INC. - SUBJECT: WASTEWATER FRANCHISE APPROVAL FROM: Joyce S. Hamilton�ULICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN Administrative AssistantREFERENCES: BAYSIDE UTILITIES, INC., & Utility Services ROBERT A. CAIRNS, TRUSTEE DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Bayside Utilities, Inc.(hereinafter referred to as Bayside), is the utility company which will provide wastewater services to Baytree, a multi -family development. Baytree is located on both sides of A -1-A, west of the Atlantic Ocean, east of Jungle Trail, north of Old Winter Beach Road, and south of Wabasso Bridge Road. A license agreement is attached which allows Bayside to build a wastewater treatment facility on land owned by Robert A. Cairns, Trustee. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES: The proposed rate structure is as follows: Connection Base Charge Usage Charge Irrigation Use Charge $500.00/unit 15.00/unit 1.50/1000 gallons .50/1000 gallons It is staff's opinion that the rates allow for a reasonable rate of return and are reasonable compared to similar franchises granted by the County. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of franchise resolution. Mr. Pinto informed the Board that this is strictly a wastewater franchise; the water service is to be furnished by the North Beach Water Company. This is a beach condominium project; the wastewater will be treated and a portion of the effluent will be used for irrigation purposes - the other discharge will be into a percolation pond. There is no direct discharge into any waters of the state, and staff finds the franchise in order and recommends approval. Attorney Steve Henderson, representing Bayside Utilities, stated that he did not have much to add except that this is a joint project between two developers, Baytree Corporation and Robert Cairns, and the franchise area 63 i encompasses properties owned by each. They have their engineer here today to answer any technical questions. Chairman Bird expressed concern about the location and buffering of the plant site, and Richard Wohlfarth, engineer for the project, reported that the plant is located on the ` north side'of Mr. Cairns property adjacent to the Sea Oaks treatment plant; it is buffered on two side by the Cairns ir property, which is vacant, and by AlA on the east. They also have a natural oak buffer about 20' wide, and the plant can hardly be seen from SR AlA. Commissioner Wodtke noted that this is the first time he has seen an irrigation use charge and wished to know if this charge is based on water usage. Mr. Wohlfarth explained that the way the irrigation charge is worked -out is by taking the total amount of effluent available each month to irrigate the common areas and dividing this amount by the number of units issued certificates of occupancy at that time; in other words, this charge is spread over all units either occupied or owned, and as more units come on line, the cost per unit will come on down. Commissioner Wodtke continued to question the proposed rate structure and wished to know whether the 50� and $1.50 charges were determined per 1,000 gallons of effluent or per 1,000 gallons of water usage. It was explained that the 50� charge is per 1,000 gallons of effluent and the $1.50 charge is based on water usage. Commissioner Wodtke felt this should be spelled out a little better, and Commissioner Lyons also felt that how you arrive at the 50� charge is not defined. Director Pinto noted that the irrigation charge has nothing to do with water consumption or the wastewater bill, and the Administrator explained that one is a volume charge and one is a fixed charge; the units pay a pro rata share 64 0�! �� NOV 21983 L r- : ti. I NOV 21993 800 55 . t�AU 2 2 for irrigation usage, and if 100,000 gallons of effluent were put on the ground for irrigation, the 20 condos would pay a pro rata share equally of that 100,000 gallons. Commissioner Lyons understood that, but asked if this was stated any place in the franchise. Attorney Brandenburg agreed this should be clarified and felt he and Attorney Henderson could work it out together. Commissioner Scurlock asked whether there will be one condominium association or several, and Attorney Henderson noted that the only one in existence at this time is Baytree Property Owners, but he does not know what there may be in the future. Commissioner Scurlock wished to make sure that developers applying for these franchises consider themselves as a true utility from the beginning and develop a rate structure that will provide a fair rate of return so that, as development takes place, they do not have to come back to the Commission asking for a 300% rate increase because they - have been subsidizing the utility operation. Attorney Henderson informed the Board that a lot of base data has been submitted to the Utility Department justifying the rate, and Director Pinto confirmed that they did a computer analysis out to the build -out of the project basing the rate on the revenue needs; the operation cost prior to development of the project will be covered by paying the rate. Commissioner Scurlock noted that he -just wanted to get this set out in the record so that a few years down the road it is very clear as to what was stated today. Mr. Wohlfarth discussed unit rates vs. a flat rate, and noted that in the case of this particular project being a somewhat seasonal project, they went.ahead and raised the flat rates up a little higher because they felt that the 65 NOV 21993 residents who are here only part time should help to pay the cost of the utility whereas in the case of Reflections on the River, which has more of a local ownership, they didn't feel that the flat rate needed to take the majority of the cost. Commi8sioner Wodtke referred back to the rates, noting that this is a new type of rate structure - there is a $15.00 a unit charge whether the residents are there or -not and whether they use any water or not, but then the usage charge is based upon 800 of whatever the consumption is. Therefore, if they were to use 3,000 gallons, apparently they are going to pay on 2,400 for usage; Mr. Wohlfarth confirmed that is correct. Commissioner Scurlock discussed the necessity of having to supplement the irrigation water with what basically would be potable water or from a well source and asked if the charge would be the same whether the irrigation water comes from an effluent source or from a deep well. Mr. Wohlfarth stated that it would and, in fact, the primary reason they have the irrigation usage charge is s_ because initially there will not be enough effluent to irrigate the total site. They must have make-up water from some source, be it potable or shallow or deep well; so they felt that the residents should be paying the utility for supplying them with "bathtub" water. Obviously, if they used a potable system, the cost for irrigating would be much higher. Commissioner Scurlock talked about the possibility of the availability of raw water from the John's Island line as an option in the future. Attorney Brandenburg discussed changes that he and Attorney Henderson have agreed need to be made in the language of the franchise. This involves deleting the following language on Page 151 of the back-up material a. ��*E 233 NOV 2193 :� .; .E 234 (page 11 of the franchise) (A) (2) ..."In conjunction with the water and/or wastewater plants purchase, the County shall also purchase necessary land areas upon which the plant is located at the then fair market value of the real estate. Upon acquisition of the water and/or wastewater plant and appurtenant real estate, County would then own the entire ....system and would terminate this franchise.and provide .......service to the franchise territory." This language would be replaced with wording stating that upon acquisition of the wastewater plant and assignment of the license agreement, County would then own the entire wastewater system. Attorney Brandenburg explained the reason for this change is that the plant sits on a piece of property by 'virtue of a license agreement which is assignable to the county, and there is no possibility in the license agreement for the county to purchase the land on which the plant sits. In addition, all references to water service should be deleted throughout the franchise . The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 83-108, known as the Bayside Utilities Wastewater System Franchise, incorporating the modifications outlined by Attorney Brandenburg, as above. Resolution 83-108 will be made a part of the Minutes when completed and received. 67 r The several bills and accounts against the County having been audited were examined and found to be correct were approved and warrants issued in settlement of same as follows: Treasury Fund Nos. 88618 - 88884 inclusive. Such bills and accounts being on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the warrants so issued from the respective bonds being listed in the Supplemental Minute Book as provided by the rules of the Legislative Auditor, reference to such record and list so recorded being made a part of these Minutes. There being no further business, on Motion made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 1:55 o'clock P.M. Attest: Clerk N 0 v 21983 Chairman 68 goof