HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/20/1984Wednesday, June 20, 1984
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County
Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida,
on Wednesday, June 20, 1984, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present -
were Don C. Scurlock, Jr., Chairman; Patrick B. Lyons, Vice
Chairman; William C. Wodtke, Jr., and Richard N. Bird.
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman was absent due to illness.
Also present were Michael J. Wright, County Administrator;
Gary Brandenburg, Attorney to the Board of County
Commissioners; L. S. "Tommy" Thomas, Intergovernmental
Relations Director; Jeffrey K. Barton, OMB Director; and
Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
Reverend Fred McClellan, First Presbyterian Church,
gave the invocation, and Commissioner Wodtke led the Pledge
of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Chairman Scurlock requested the addition to today's
Agenda of a Proclamation in honor of Bamma Lawson's 102nd
birthday.
Administrator Wright requested the addition to today's
Agenda of a brief discussion re a change order on the 16th
Street bike path, which was brought to his attention Monday. -
Attorney Brandenburg requested the addition to today's
Agenda of a discussion re a contract with West Utilities,
Inc., which is necessary prior to the actual signing of the
contracts for the SR -60 waterline.
JUN 2 0 1984 aooK 57 F,�IIE 462 j
I
JUN 2 0 1984 BOOK '57 F�,GE 463
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Bowman being
absent) added the above items to today's Agenda.
CLERK TO THE BOARD
A. New Application for Permit to Carry a Concealed Firearm
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/12/84:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: June 12, 1984 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT: PISTOL PERMITS.- NEW
FROM: Michael Wright REFERENCES:
County Administrator
The following individuals have applied for new pistol
permits through the Clerk's office:
Donald R. Hunter
Elizabeth M. Hunter
Pearl Elizabeth Dean
.All requirements of Ordinance 82-27 have been met and
are in order.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board
unanimously (4-0) granted the issuance of a permit
to carry a concealed firearm for the following
persons:
Donald R. Hunter
Elizabeth M. Hunter
Pearl Elizabeth Dean
2
B. Reapplication for Permit to Carry a Concealed Firearm _
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/6/84:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: June 6, 1984 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT: PISTOL PERMIT - NEW
FROM: Michael Wright REFERENCES:
County Administrator
The following named person is U;.�p`ly�ng for a new
pistol permit:
Edward Lee Ayers
All requirements of Ordinance 82-27 have been met
and are in order.
Commissioner Lyons thought that the Commission had
indicated in the meeting of May 2, 1984 that a reapplication
would not be accepted until after six months. Administrator
Wright, however, noted that the Minutes of that meeting show
that the Motion stated that the applicant could reapply
"within" six months.
A Motion was made by Commissioner Wodtke to approve the
reapplication for a permit to carry a concealed firearm to
Edward Lee Ayers. The Motion died for lack of a Second.
Attorney Brandenburg advised that without an
affirmative Motion to grant the permit, the applicant would
not receive it.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Wodtke requested that Items F. H, and I be
removed from the Consent Agenda at this time.
3
JUN 20 �V4
BooK 57 PAGE 464
JUN 2 0 1994 BooK 57 PnUE 465
A. Reports
Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk:
Traffic Violation Bureau - Special Trust Fund
May, 1984 -- $32,128.76
Traffic Violations by Name - May, 1984
B. Budget Amendment - Traffic Engineering
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/7/84:
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 7, 1984 FILE:
SUBJECT: Traffic Engineering
-a:
FROM: Jeffrey K. Barton, REFERENCES:
OMB Director
The following budget amendment is to record the revenue and expense of traffic
signs for developers. ,
Account Title Account No. Increase Decrease
Reimbursements -Traffic Signs 004-000-369-42.00 1,000
Traffic Sign/signals 004-246-541-35.36 1,000
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) approved the above budget
amendment, as recommended by OMB Director
Jeff Barton.
61
C. Budget Amendment - Traffic Engineering
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/7/84:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
w
FROM: Jeffrey K. Barton,
OMB Director
DATE: June 7, 1984 FILE:
SUBJECT: Traffic Eegineering
REFERENCES:
The following budget amendment is to record the revenue and expense of traffic
signal maintenance due to an accident .10/15/83 at Oslo Road & Kings Highway.
Account Title 'Account'No. "',-Increase* Decrease
Ins. proceeds/ furn-equip 004-000-364-42.00 1,735
Maint.- Traffic Signals 004245-541-34.67 1,735
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) approved the above budget
amendment, as recommended by OMB Director
Jeff Barton.
D. IRC Bid #203, Aluminum Blanks (Street & Road Signs)
The Board reviewed the following memo datPH A/R/R4:
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 8, 1984 FILE:
THRU: Michael Wright SUBJECT: IRC Bid 0203 -Aluminum Blanks
County Administrator (Street & Road Signs)
FROM: REFERENCES:
Carolyn, -Goodrich, Manager _
Purchasing Department
1. Description and Conditions
Bids were received June 5, 1984 at 11:'00 A.M. for IRC Bid #203- Aluminum
Sign Blanks for the Traffic Engineering Department.
10 Bid Proposals were sent out. Of the 6 Bids received, 2 were "No Bids."
5
JUN 2 0 1984 BOOK 57 PAGE %
JUN 2 0 1984
BOOK 5.7' FA -UE 467
2. Alternatives and Analysis
This is an annual bid effective July 1, 1984 - June 30, 1985 and the
County reserves the right to order any quantity of any item throughout
a
the year.
y
The overall low bidder is Vulcan Sign & Stampings, Foley, Al. Vulcan Signs
has the current bid and delivery service has been good.
3. Recommendation and Funding
It is recommended that IRC Bid #203 be awarded to Vulcan Sign & Stampings.
There was $12,000 budgeted in Account #004-245-541-35-36.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) awarded Annual IRC Bid #203
to the low bidder, Vulcan Sign & Stampings,
for aluminum sign blanks for street and road
signs, as listed in the bid tabulation.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
BID TABULATIONaro
141
v
v c c ^B `em �y Q.
�h ,: y -41^
k^ a t`m F. vQ 4 pe4R; Jr
BID NO.
IRC BID #203
DATE OF OPENINGo
June 5, 1984
BID TITLE
ALUMINUM BLANKS (Street & Rd'Sign
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE I
1. 30" Octagon (Stop Sign) Each
NB
le
8
64
9
35
10 77
9
70
2. 36" x 36" x 36" Triangle Each
7
60
6
80
7 83
7
10
_
3. 30" Pentagon' School Each8
go10
858
20
9
14
4. 18" Diamond Each
3
80
3
75
4 32
3
93
5. 30" Diamond Each
10.56
10
45
12 03
10
93
6. 36" Diamond Each
1 15120
15
00
17 28
15
75
7. 12"'x 18" Each
2
53
2
50
2 88
2
62
8. 18" x 24" Each
5
07
�5
00
5 76
5
25
9. 12" x 36" Each
5
5
00
5 76
5
5-
10. 21" x 15" Each
3
69
3
65
4 20
3
83
11. 24" x 24" Each
6.75
6
70
7 71
7
00
12. 24" x 30" Each
8144
8
35
9 61
8
75
13. 18" x 6" Each
1126
1
25
1 44
1
31
14. 24" x 6" Each
1169
1
70
1 96
1
75
15. 30" x 6" Each
2
11
2
10
2 42
2
18
_
16. 24" x 8" Each
2
24
2.25
2 60
2
34
_
17. 30" x 8" Each2
80
2
80
22
2
92
18. Delivery Time in Days Da s
After receipt of P.O.
2
14-
30-'5
30 45
3
-
A
E. Budget Amendment - County Attorney
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/12/84:
TO: The Honorable Board of County DATE: June 12, 1984 FILE:
Commissioners
FROM: Gary Brandenburg
County Attorney
SUBJECT: County Attorney's Department
REFERENCES:
The following budget amendment is to correctly allocate the salaries and benefits
for the addition of an Assistant County Attorney and a Legal Secretary 11:
Account Title
Regular Salaries
Social Security
Retirement
Ins.-Life/Health
Work. Compensation
Reserve for Contingency
Balance in Reserve
6/7/84
$235,740.
JUN -2 0 1984
Increase Decrease
001-102-514-•11.12
8,750
001-102-514••1.?..11
613
001-102-514-12.12
957
001-102-514.12.13
761
001-102-514-12.14
44
001-199-513-99.91
11,125
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) approved the above budget
amendment, as requested by the County Attorney.
7
BOOK
57 PnE468
JUN 2 0 1984
BOOK .57 PACE 469
G. Request for Extension of Preliminary Plat Approval for
Laurel Court Subdivision
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/11/84:
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: June 11, 1984 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY
PLAT APPROVAL FOR LAUREL
_ SUBJECT: COURT SUBDIVISION
Robert M. Keatihg, oftCP
Planning & Development Director
FROM: Clare z. Poupard tj� REFERENCES: Laurel Crt.
Staff Planner DIS:CLARE
It is requested that the following information be given formal
consideration by the Board of County .Commissioners at their
regular meeting on June 20, 1984.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Laurel Court is a,,± 9.8 acre, 31 lot subdivision located
between 12th and 14th Streets, east of 42nd Avenue. The
property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential (6.2 dwelling
units/acre) and has a LD -2, low-density residential+(6 dwelling
units/acre) land use designation. The proposed building
density is 3.16 dwelling units/acre.
The applicant received preliminary plat approval on January 19,
1983. Thus, preliminary plat approval would have expired on
June 19, 1984, if the applicant had not submitted a plat
extension request prior to this time.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The applicant has submitted a request for an 18 month extension
of preliminary plat approval. According to the County's
Subdivision Ordinance 75-3 (the ordinance under which this
preliminary plat was approved),
"The following limitations and conditions are placed on
the preliminary plat approvals given by the Board:
(1) The approval of the Board shall have full force and
effect for a period of 18 months from the date of
approval. An extension may be granted by the
Board."
Historically, the Board of County Commissioners has granted
one, 18 month, extension of plat approval to any applicant who
requests it.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
an 18 month extension of preliminary plat approval to Laurel
Court Subdivision.
8
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) granted an 18 -month extension
of preliminary plat approval to Laurel Court Sub-
division, as recommended by staff.
F. Request for Final Plat Approval of Forest Lake Unit 2
Subdivision
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/11/84:
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: June 11, 1984 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
SUBJECT:
Robert M. Keatingj7AICP
Planning & Development Director
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF
FOREST LAKE UNIT 2 SUBDI-
VISION
FROM: Clare Z. PoupardREFERENCE rest Lake
Staff Planner DIS:CLARE
It is requested that the following information be given formal
consideration by the Board.- of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting on June 20, 1984.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Forest Lake Unit.2 subdivision is located on the south side of
1st Street S.W., we -at of 43rd Avenue. It is westward of, and
adjacent to, the existing Forest Lake Subdivision. The
proposed development has eight lots on ±6 acres. The land is
zoned R-1, Single Family Residential (6.2 dwelling 4units /acre)
and has a LD -1 (3 dwelling units/acre) land use designation_.
The proposed building density is 1.3 dwelling units/acre.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The Public Works Director has made a field inspection and found
all on-site improvements to have been constructed according to
County regulations. The face of the plat has been approved for
legal sufficiency by the County Attorney's office. The lots
within the subdivision conform to the County's Zoning Code and
the approved preliminary plat. Thus, all requirements concern-
ing final plat approval have been addressed by the applicant.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval to Forest Lake Unit 2 Subdivision.
E
JUN 2 0 1984 B3OK , 5 Phar 470
JUN 2 0 7984 BOOK 57 PAGE 471
1
Attorney Brandenburg explained that there is a
maintenance easement around the lake that has been left out
of the dedicatory language on the plat. With that
modification, the plat is in fine order and he recommended
approval.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) granted final plat approval
to Forest Lake Unit 2 Subdivision; with the
modification in the dedicatory language, as
stated by the County Attorney.
H. & I. Request for Final Payment and Change Order,
Tracking Station Park
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/18/84:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: June 18, 1984 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Michael Wright,
County Administrator
FROM: V. -L. Griffith, Jr.
County Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for Final Payment and
Approval of Change Order No. 8102 -
VI -2 Tracking Station Park -
Third Dune Walkover - James P. War
Contractor
P.E. REFERENCES:
DESCRIPTION OF CONDITIONS
On May 16, 1984, the County entered into a contract with James
P. Warr for installation of the Third Walkover at the Tracking
Station Park in the amount of $17,000. The Notice -to -Proceed
was issued for work to begin on May 30, 1984 and be completed
in 30 days.
At this time, the work has not been completed but it is
estimated that it will be completed prior to June 26, 1984.
ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES
The permit issued by the Department of Environmental Regulations
(D.E.R.) was modified by them to meet with their requirements.
-In the interest of meeting a June 30, 1984 grant deadline, we
had advertized for bids using our original plans. A Change Order
was prepared to increase the length of the walkover to comply
with DER requirements and is attached for approval.
10
The contractor will be required to comply with all terms of
the contract prior to release of payment.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Since this is the final scheduled meeting of the Board prior
to June 30, 1984 which is the deadline for all documents related
to this grant to be in Tallahassee, the following is recommended:
1) Approve authorization for the Chairman of the Board of
County Commissioners to sign Change Order No. 8102 -VI -
2 in the amount of $2,691.15.
2) Accept project as completed upon inspection and approval
of same by Tommy Thomas and Jim Davis. All warranty periods
will begin on that date.
3) Approve final payment in the amount of $19,691.15 to be
held until project is complete as per No. 2 above.
4) Authorize Jim Davis to accept contractor's affidavit.
Funding to be from Account #102-210-572-66.39 Tracking Station
Park Construction account.
County Engineer, V. G. Griffith, stated that the con-
tractor, James P. Warr, is requesting that the Commission
approve final payment in the amount of $19,691.15 with the
provision that payment will be held until such time as the
project is completed, which is expected to be the 26th of
this month. He noted there is a June 30th deadline to get
all the paperwork to Tallahassee in order to obtain grant
money.
Administrator Wright explained that the DER required
that the length of the walkover to be increased by 16 feet,
which resulted in an additional cost of $2,691. The original
length was 104 feet. He asked the Board to approve the
additional cost as part of the change order.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) approved Change Order No.
8102 -VI -2 in the amount of $2,691.15 for a 16 ft.
extension of the third crossover in the Tracking
Station Park; with the funding to come from grant
11
JUN 194 eoo
4
7^E
BOOK 57 PAGE 473
money, and authorized final payment of $19,691.15
to contractor, James P. Warr; subject to
completion of the project and acceptance by the
County Engineer.
CHANGE11,111bull.)n
to
ORDER
AJA L)0(-UAJ[NI 6,701
L
Engineer
Engineer
CONIRACTOR
I11LD
()11UR
u
❑
❑
Fl
L7
CHANGL ORJ)EK NUMBER. 8102 -VI -2
PRVIECT: DPW #8102
(name, addres>) Indian River County
Tracking Station
TO (Contractor):
James P. Warr
General Contractor
P.O. Box 1731
L
Vero Beach, Florida 32961-1731
INITIATION DATE: June 15, 1984
ENGINEER PROJECT NO: 8102
CONTRACT FOR: Oune Walkover
CONTRACT DATE: May 16, 1984
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
1. Extend the Dune Walkover an additional sixteen (16) feet in the landward
direction.
Cost $ 2,691.15
Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Engineer
.signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time.
The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) was ............................ S 17,000.00
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................... S The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was .......... S
The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged') S 2691.15
by this Change Order ..............................................
The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order .will be ... 3 19,691 .15 ( 0 )Days.
The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
Authorized:
Vibert Griffith, Jr., P.E. James P. Warr Indian River cntTniv
h Street 1(,�T`�:` TOR 1731 IM'25th Street
Address Addr"% Addie»
r ~ Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Vero Beach, Florida 32961-1731 Vero B
uATt GLLS�— I�AII (020 �
--
AIA DOCUMENT G'O1 (tiA,*,(A t,Kt)1K ' �''^'� 1''74 IU''I()t' . AI -,^ " G701-1478
TME AMERICAN INSIITUIt Ut AKLMUL15, 173 Ntw �iit�. ♦\t . N N 01
12
� � r
PROCLAMATION - HONORING VOLUNTEERS IN MOCK DISASTER _
Chairman Scurlock read aloud the following proclamation
and presented it to Steve Wells, Director of Emergency
Management, who accepted it on behalf of all the volunteers
who joined together to simulate an emergency response to a
mock disaster.
13
JUN 2 0 1984 BOOK 57 mCE 7
r JUN 20 1964
P R O C L A M A T I O N
BOOK 57 PACE 475
WHEREAS, on March 6, 1984, more than 100 Indian River
County officials and volunteers joined together with forces from
neighboring counties to simulate an emergency response to a real
life drama that none of them ever desire to become a reality ---a
major accident at the St. Lucie County Florida Power and Light
nuclear power plant; and
WHEREAS, under the coordination of the Indian River
County Department of Emergency Management, headed by Director
Steven Wells, this County's volunteers and personnel performed
dynamically and with precision in the many roles required of them
to serve as a "host" County, monitoring those evacuating from
neighboring "risk" counties; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency
sanctioned the exercise and.provided an overall performance ---
evaluation, the results of which showed Indian River County's
organization to have no deficiencies, very few areas for
improvement and predominately superior items noted; and
WHEREAS, the health, safety, and welfare of every
citizen in the County is very much dependent upon the County's
network of emergency management officials and volunteers in a time
of disaster or civil emergency; and
WHEREAS, all those who participated in the exercise,
from the Red Cross and medical establishment to CB radio operators
and retired persons, are deserving of acknowledgment and
commendation for their awareness and skilled reactions, and
especially for the courage to take on a most serious responsib-
ility for the benefit of this County.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that all those who
joined together in this County's Emergency Management response
effort to fend against this mock disaster, and who must
continuously stand ready in the event of a real disaster, be
commended for their preparation and performance.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By � G ,,1eze.&ZA
DON C. SCUR OCK, JR.
Chairman , . , , .
Attest:
Freda Wright
Clerk of Circuit Court
14
PROCLAMATION - PHYSICAL THERAPY WEEK _
Chairman Scurlock read aloud the following proclamation
and presented it to David Nelson, Administrator of the
Sunshine Physical Therapy Clinic, and Ron Wilson, Director
of Physical Therapy at Indian River Memorial Hospital, who
thanked the Commission for designating the week of June
17-23 as Physical Therapy Week.
15
JUN 20 1984 BOOK 7 PAGE A 76
Fr -
JUN 2 0 1984
P R O C L A M A T I O N
BOCK 57 rt. -1;!,-: 47
WHEREAS, the American Physical Therapy Association is
observing a NATIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY WEEK entitled "Physical
Therapy: In Touch With You"; and
WHEREAS, in observation of this week is calling special
attention to the contribution of physical therapy toward
improving the quality of life for disabled and ill Americans; and
WHEREAS, the goals of the American Physical Therapy
Association of Indian River County are to achieve better lives
for our disabled citizens and to promote preventive measures to
keep healthy citizens whole through improvement of education,
practice and research, and to serve its members through
identification, communication and fellowship; and
- WHEREAS, the American Physical Therapy Association of Indian
River County plays an integral role in continued efforts to
assist disabled citizens and holds steadfastly to its commitment
to secure better health for all our citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the week of
June 17-23, 1984 be designated as
PHYSICAL THERAPY WEEK
in Indian River County, and urge all public officials and private
citizens to join with the physical therapy profession to secure
better health care for all our citizens. ,
ATTEST:
t
Freda WWr g , Clork
16
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
jmwt
Don C. Scurlock, Jr., hairman
�l
M
PROCLAMATION - BAMMA LAWSON'S 102nd BIRTHDAY
Chairman Scurlock read aloud the following proclamation
and announced that it would be hand delivered to Bamma
Lawson in Sebastian on her 102nd birthday.
17
'L- JUN 20 1984
BOOK 5 7 FACE 478
JUN 20 1984
P R O C L A M A T I O N
BOOK 57 Fnx.419 7
WHEREAS, June 22, 1984 will mark the 102nd birthday of MRS.
BAMMA LAWSON; and
WHEREAS, MRS. BAMMA LAWSON moved from Hahira, Georgia in
1906 to the City of Sebastian; and
WHEREAS, MRS. BAMMA LAWSON has devoted her life to the
enrichment of the Sebastian community; and
WHEREAS, MRS. BAMMA LAWSON began the first open library in
Sebastian, making her home and books available to the local
children; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed fitting for the Board of County
Commissioners to recognize MRS. BAMMA LAWSON's birthday and honor
her on this 102nd year of her life,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, this 20th day of June, 1984, that MRS. BAMMA
LAWSON is extended sincere wishes for a Happy 102nd birthday, and
many happy returns.
ATTEST: ��� 'CCL L
Freda Wright, Cllr
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Don C. Scurlock, Jr., Ch man
18
PUBLIC HEARING - MCDOUGALD REQUEST TO REDESIGNATE 17.54 .
ACRES FROM LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 2 TO COMMERCIAL
The hour of 9:15 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
NOTICE — PUBLIC NG 3�
TOCONSID RADOPTIONOFEACOUNTV
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE ,_°
Vero Beach, Indian River Count Florida
%f�
ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:'
Notice of hearing to consider than of
e County Ordinance amending the Lend Use Ele
the Comprehensive
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
ment of Plan by redesignate.
Ing land from: _ t
LD "Low Dent'
Before
-2, Resldendal 2 (up to 6J
8 unite/acre) to "Commercial:' The c
the undersigned authority
g y personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
sub
ffact property pr�nUy owned by Roland f;,
McDougald, itis Elbert
at Vero Beach 'n Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
.Clyde , aW,
McDougald and lingua =veld Is lo-
sated Ea of 8th Avenue,' 41
.W. and
SouthStreet, S.W. (Oslo Road).s
a of Oth
a
-
subject stop T71 Is described as
E PARCEL "A. -- E NORTH 860 FEET a
OF THE 'NORTHWEST '/A "OF THE
' NORTHEA$T'N OF SECTION 26; TO
the matter of
SHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST• SAID �l
LYING AND ,BEING IN `,INDIAN
LRIVER, COUNTY, '•;FLORIDA : LESS'
RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF ReCORD; LYING'
WEST OF THE WEST :RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF LATERAL "J"
CANAL: SAID PARCEL
in the
CONTAINING 8.18 NET ACRES. -
.i; PARCEL'S'.' — THE NORTH 880 FEET %"
Court, was pub-
OF`THE,NORTHWEST '1. OF SECTION _„
/
lished in said newspaper in the issues of C/ GL ! �
25; TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH. RANGE 39
EAST INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLOR
ID/1.'_ .LESS RIGHTS -0F -WAY OF S,k
6f ;
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscri%d beYre meAis day of A.D. 19
(SEAL)
�J� lV�f.J6-•
(Clerk of the Circuit Cou
iness Manager)
ndian River County, Florida)
19
- win, n0nr
ING 11.38 NET ACRES
A
public eating
at which �perties in Interest
and bifizena shall have an opportunity to be
heard; will be held by.the Board of County Com-
missloners of Indian River- County, Florida, in the
County Commission Chambers of the County
Administration building, located at 1840 25th
Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on June 20,1984, at
19;15 A.M. y ...'i ,
If any person decides to appeal any decision
r -made- on the above matter, he/she will need a
"record of the proceedings, and for such put
„;poses, he/she may need to ensure that a verba-
" tim record of the proceedings Is made, which In-
cludes testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal Is based.
Iridian River County
.Board Of County Commissioners V.
By: -s -Don C. Scurlock Jr.
Chairman
May 31, June 12,1884.
JUN 2 0 1984 BOOP( 57 PAGE 480
JUN 2 0 1994 BOOK 57 pnE 4.8
The Board read the following memo dated 5/25/84:
10: =---s-- � . DATE: - FILE:
The Honorable Members May 25, 1984
of the Board of
County Commissioners McDOUGALD REQUEST TO
REDESIGNATE 17.54 ACRES
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: FROM LD -2, L017 -DENSITY
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL 2, TO
A. COMMERCIAL
Robert M. Keat ng ICP
Planning & Development Director
FROM:is
Richard Shearer, AICPREFERENCES' Hardee CPA
Chief, Long -Range Planning RJCH
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of June 20,'1984.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The applicant, Wellford Hardee, an agent for Ronald, Clyde,
Elbert and Angus McDougald, is requesting to amend the
Comprehensive Plan by xedesignating 17.54 acres located on the
south side of Oslo Road and both sides of the lateral J Canal
from LD -2, Low -Density Residential 2 (up to 6 units/acre), to
Commercial.
The owners propose to develop this property for a funeral home.
On May 10, 1984, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
3 -to -1 to recommend approval of this request. The Commission
stated that they did not feel that this property should be
included in a node or in an MXD area.but there were special
conditions that warranted changing the land use designation to
commercial.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the .
application will be presented. The analysis will include a
description of the current and future land uses of the site and
surrounding areas, pott,,.�nfial iwpacts on the transportation and
utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on
environmental quality.
20
Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject property contains two, single-family residences, a
church, a grocery store, some vacant buildings and vacant land,
and is zoned C-1, Commercial District. North of the subject
property, across Oslo Road, is the Timber Ridge Tennis Club,
under development, which is zoned C-1 and R -2D, Multiple -Family
District. East of the tennis club are vacant land and
single-family residences in an R-1, Single -Family District.
East of the subject property -are the Knights of Columbus,
a single-family residence, Father and Son Appliances, a vacant
parcel of land, and two single-family residences in a C-1
district. South of the subject property is undeveloped land in
an R-1 district. West of the subject property are
single-family residences and undeveloped land.
Future Land Use Pattern
The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and
all of the land northeast, east, south, and west of it as LD -2,
Low -Density Residential 2 (up to 6'units/acre). Northwest of
the subject property is the easternmost part of the eastern
area of the Oslo Road MXD, Mixed Use District (up to 6.
units/acre).
The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan discourages
strip commercial development along arterial streets such as
Oslo Road, but encourages compact commercial development in
identified commercial nodes. The 80 acre U.S.1 and Oslo Road
commercial node is less than one-half mile east of the subject
property. Northwest of the subject property, extending one and
one-quarter miles to the west,. is the east area of the Oslo
Road MXD. This area is zoned C-1 and M-1, Restricted
Industrial District. The M-1 zoned area contains heavy
commercial uses. West of this MXD'area is some vacant land
zoned C -land there are commercial uses at 27th Avenue. West
of 27th Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet, is the west area of
the Oslo Road MXD which extends more than three-quarters of a
mile west to 43rd Avenue and is zoned C-1 and C -2r Heavy
Commercial District. Within these MXD areas and in the Oslo
Road/U.S.1 commercial node, there should be enough commercial
land to serve this a`cea of the County.
Based on the location of the commercial node at U.S, 1 and Oslo
Road and the commercial opportunities within the MXD areas,
redesignating the subject property Commercial would encourage
further strip commercial development along Oslo Road. If this
trend is unchecked, all of the land fronting on Oslo Road from
east of U.S. 1 westward to 43rd -Avenue (a distance of three and
one-half miles) could be designated as commercial or MXD and
zoned commercial.
Transportation System
The subject property has direct access to Oslo Road (classified
as an arterial street on the Thoroughfare Plan). Commercial
development of the subject property could attract up to 5,788'
average annual daily trips (AADT). Residential development of
the subject property would generate 735 AADT. Currently, Oslo
Road carries 6,000 AADT at level -of -service B. The additional
5,788 AADT would lower the level -of -service to D.
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally
sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area.
21 194 pp
JUN 2 O BOOK 57 vrE 482
� J
JUN 2 0 1994
Boox 57 FATE 483
Utilities
County water is available but County wastewater facilities are
not available for the subject property.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this
request for the reason stated in the Description and Conditions
section of this memorandum. While the Planning staff respects
the Planning and Zoning Commission's opinion, staff recommends
denial of this request because it is contrary to the
Comprehensive Plan policies discouraging strip commercial
development.
Robert Keating, Director of Planning & Development,
presented staff's recommendation for denial of this request
for redesignation as it is contrary to the Comprehensive
Plan policies discouraging strip commercial development. He
showed an aerial view of the subject property and
surrounding area, which is presently zoned Commercial. The
owners propose to develop this property for a funeral home.
Director Keating emphasized that if this property was
developed into commercial use, it would generate over 5700
average annual daily trips, as opposed to 700 for
residential use.
Wellford Hardee, agent for owners Ronald, Clyde, Elbert
and Angus McDougald, pointed out that he has been a local
realtor since 1960 and feels he is knowledgeable about Vero
Beach and Indian River County. Mr. Hardee distributed maps
of the area with color photographs of various structures
attached and pointed out the many commercial uses in the
area at present. He believed that the commercial aspect of
Oslo Road has much improved over the years through the
construction of nurseries, garages, trade establishments,
_ and one small shopping center and he emphasized that.the
McDougald property has been zoned commercial for many years.
22
- M
He further noted that Oslo Road is designated as an arterial
road in the County Thoroughfare Plan and stated that he,
personally, would not like to rear his family in this area,
which is next to a highway that is traveled by 6,000
vehicles a day.
Ronald McDougald, who w4s born and raised on the
subject property, confirmed that Oslo Road was a very busy
highway. He noted that his family has had a commercial
operation in this area since 1946, and he could not
understand why this property did not get "grandfathered" in
like the place across the street, Timber Ridge Tennis Ranch.
Mr. McDougald also pointed out that the Planning and Zoning
Commission had voted 3-1 to recommend approval of the
redesignation because of special conditions that warranted
the change.
Bill Stegkemper, experienced realtor and property
appraiser in Indian River County, spoke as an expert witness
on behalf of the property owners, citing the case of the
Marcella Villa tract on 20th Street in Vero Beach across
from St. Helen's Catholic Church, wherein the City denied
the owner's request for rezoning from R-1 Residential to R-2
so that it could be used for offices, but after a long court
procedure, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that
the City had to rezone the property to R-2. Mr. Stegkemper
also referred to the recent decision by this Commission to
include the Fleischmann property in the U.S. #1 and Oslo
Road commercial node, and emphasized that the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan states that "certain parcels of land which do
not conform to the policies for nodal development, but which
can be demonstrated to be suitable for commercial or
industrial development and otherwise meet standards
described in this element, may receive consideration by the
Board of County Commissioners for commercial or industrial
zoning classification." He pointed out the extensive
23 �y o
JUN 20 1984 BOOK 57 PAGE 484
JUN 2 0 1984 BOOK '7 PAGE 485
commercial activity west of the subject property, and also
noted that Oslo Road is an arterial roadway. Mr. Stegkemper
stressed that this is a commercial area and urged the Board
to consider this matter very carefully.
Chairman Scurlock opened the Public,Hearing and asked
if anyone wished to be heard in this matter.
Bob Schlitt, representing the Knights of Columbus,
whose meeting hall is located on Oslo Road, stated they have
no objection to this change.
Mr. Hardee then quoted the following from a letter
dated March 6, 1984, written to the McDougalds by Larry
Burkhart, Chief, Code Enforcement: "Pursuant to our
conversation of last week, this confirms that if a parcel is
zoned commercial and planned for residential use in the
Comprehensive Plan, the land must then be zoned to an
appropriate residential district before a building permit
can be issued. Should a residence exist on the property and
become destroyed, it could not be rebuilt under the existing
commercial zoning because the land is planned for
residential use under the Comprehensive Plan as it exists
today." Mr. Hardee also referred to a letter dated August
3, 1984 from Chief Planner Richard Shearer, which stated
that commercial and industrial land uses are not allowed in
LD -2 areas regardless of current zoning. Mr. Hardee felt
that these two letters leave the McDougalds in an
intolerable situation where the only thing they can do with
their land is to pay taxes on it. According to the
Property Appraiser's Office, their 1983 taxes of $2494 were
compiled on a composite rate, the rear portion of the land
being taxed at the residential rate and the Oslo Road
frontage for a depth of 660 feet at the higher commercial
rate. Mr. Hardee felt that if Indian River County is taxing
_ . this property as commercial, they should allow it to be used
for commercial.
24
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board
unanimously closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Bird asked Attorney Brandenburg what the
proper action would be if the Board agreed to allow this
property to be used for commercial, and Attorney Brandenburg
stated that it has to be determined not only that the
property has some unique circumstances which make it
unsuitable to include it within a node, but also that,
because of those circumstances, it should be used for
commercial purposes. It is a two-pronged determination.
Commissioner Bird felt that the first premise would be
fulfilled by its proximity to the other node at U.S. #1 and
the second premise would be satisfied because even though it
is not suitable for being designated as a node, there are
special circumstances unique to this property and its
location that make it suitable for commercial development.
Chairman Scurlock pointed out that those were the same
reasons that the Planning and Zoning Commission found for-
recommending
or
recommending that the property be redesignated to
commercial.
Commissioner Bird felt that this Commission, the
Planning & Zoning Commission, and staff are making a valiant
effort to eliminate strip zoning, but they have inherited
some situations that make it very difficult to draw the
line.
Director Keating believed that this property is a good
location for R-2, multiple housing, as the tract is
sufficiently large enough to provide a buffer from the road.
25
JUN 2 0 1994
L_
BOOK 7 F�„E486
JUN 2 0 1994
BOOK
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wodtke,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, that the
Board accept the recommendation of the
57 PAvF 487
Planning & Zoning Commission and adopt Ordinance
84-36 providing for the redesignation of 17.54
acres owned by the McDougalds from LD -2,
Low -Density Residential 2, to Commercial, due to
the fact that the current uses are commercial; it
is quite a distance away from a node; and it is
the highest and best use of the property.
Under discussion, Commissioner Lyons did not buy the
argument that the area is not suitable for residential use,
as there are many residences on streets that have heavier
traffic than Oslo Road, and he did feel that R -2D would be a
very satisfactory use, but had a problem in that the owner
right across the street has the right to put in a 7.5 acre
commercial development. Therefore, although he is dead set
against continuing this strip zoning, he felt he could do
nothing except vote for this redesignation today.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
The Motion was voted on and carried
unanimously (4-0).
Director Keating advised Commissioner Bird that he did
not think that staff would recommend the extension of the
MXD District down the opposite side of Oslo Road.
M
M
ORDINANCE NO. 84-36
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to redesignate the
hereinafter described property and pursuant thereto held a public
hearing in relation thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens
were heard; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Ca missioners of Indian River
County, Florida, that the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan of
Indian River County, Florida, and the accompanying Land Use Map, be
amended as follows:
1. That the Land Use Map be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit:
PARCEL "A" - THE NORTH 660 FEET OF THE NOR HwEST 34, OF THE NORTHEAST
4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. SAID LAND LYING
AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS RIGHTS -OF -MY OF
RECORD, LYING WEST OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LATMAL "J" CANAL.
SAID PAWEL CONTAINING 6.16 NET ACRES.
PARCEL "B" - THE NORTH 660 FEET OF THE N01MMST P4 OF THE NORTHEAST
4 OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD, LYING EAST OF
rAmERAr. "J" CANAL, SAID ppm, CONTAINING 11.38 NET ACRES.
Be changed from LD -2, Low -Density Residential 2, to Commercial.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in
said Land Use Element.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Cmmissioners
of Indian River County, Florida on this 20th day of June, 1984.
Ir �Z�• ••+ W-13
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this 25th
day of June , 1984.
Effective Date: Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on
this 29 day of June, 1984, at 11 A.M./P.M. and filed in the office of
the Clerk of the Board of County Comassioners of Indian River County,
Florida.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY.
BOOK 57 PAIGE 488
JUN 2 0 1994 nox 57 PAOF489
PUBLIC HEARING - INDIAN RIVER CITRUS LEAGUE REQUEST TO
REZONE 2.24 ACRES FROM MULTIPLE -DWELLING DISTRICT TO
AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
The hour of 9:30 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach- in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
in the matter
in the
Iished in said newspaper in the issues
Court, was pub -
Affiant further says that the said Vero teach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. ®�
Sworn to and subscrihmd behbre m is day of A.D. 19 _ 7
•
b
�jusiness Manager)
(Clerk of the Circu Cou hdian River County, Florida)
(SEAL)
27
-NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of hearing to consider the adoption of
r County ordinance rezoning land from:
R-3, "Multiple -Dwelling Districr' to A.
"Agricultural District." The subject prop-
of�(y- presenti owned by INDIAN RIVER
CITRU3 LEAGUE Is located West of
Greenbrier ..Subdivision, between 78th
Avenue and 82nd Avenue South of S.R.;
80.
The subject propg�y is described as:. .
THE NORTH 830 FEET OF THE EAST 5
ACRES OF THE WEST 20 ACRES OF
TRACT 11, SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 33
SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, INDIAN'
RIVER COUNTY,' FLORIDA, ACCORD-
ING TO THE LAST GENERAL PLAT OF
LANDS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS
LAND COMPANY SUBDIVISION AS RE-
CORDED IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25,.v
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE
COUNTY; • FLORIDA, SAID LAND NOW
LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS- RIGHTS -OF- - .
WAY OF RECORD., SAID LAND CON
TAINING 2.24 ACRE&:
A public hearing at which parties in interest
and citizens shall have. an opportunity to, be
heard, will be held by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the
County Commission Chambers, of the County
Administration Building, located At 1840. 25th
Street, Vero Beach, Florida,on Juna 4 1984, at
9:30 A.M.'
If any person decides to appeal any decision
made on the above matter. he/she will need a
record of the proceedings, and for such pur-
poses, he/she may need to ensure that a. verba-
tim record of the proceedings is made, which In-
cludes testimony and evident upon which the
appeal is based. -
Indian RiverCounty
Board of County Commissioners
By: -s -Don C Scurlock Jr
" Chairman
May 31, June 12 1934
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/14/84;
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: May 14, 1984 FILE:
the Board of County
Commissioners INDIAN RIVER CITRUS
LEAGUE: REQUEST TO RE-
ZONE 2.24 ACRES FROM
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENC% R-3, MULTIPLE -DWELLING
UBJECT: DISTRICT, TO A, AGRI-
CULTURAL DISTRICT
Robert M. Keats g, VCP
Planning & Development Director
les
FROM: Chief,dLong-RangeAPlannirICP �I
FEREiVCES: CH
P&Z
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board bf County Commissioners at their -
regular meeting of June 20, 1984.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The applicant, the Indian River Citrus League, acting as agent
for the five owners; is requesting to rezone approximately 2.24
acres located on the south side of State Road 60 and 100 feet
west of 79th Avenue from R-3, Multiple -Dwelling District (up to
15 units/acre), to A, Agricultural District.
The subject property is part of a 4.89 acre parcel of land.
The remaining 2.65 acres of land are located south of the
subject property and are already zoned Agricultural. The
applicant intends to develop the property as a meeting hall and
offices for the Citrus League.
On May 10, 1984, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
4 -to -0 to recommend approval of this request.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the
application will be presented. The analysis will include a
description of the current and future land uses of the site and
surrounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and
utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on
environmental quality.
Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject property is currently vacant except for one
single-family residence. East of the subject property is a
strip of vacant land along S.R. 60 which is zoned R-3 and
Greenbrier, a single-family subdivision, zoned R-1,
Single -Family District (up to 6.2 units/acre). Further east is
more vacant land and Tamara Gardens, a condominium development
in an R -2D, Multiple -Family District (up to 6 units/acre).
North of the subject property is Westgate, a single-family
subdivision, and the Faith Baptist Church, both located in an
R-1 zoning district. East of Westgate Subdivision is the
Pinecreek condominium development under construction in an R -2D
zoning district. West of the subject property is a horse farm.
Further west are the First Banker's facilities. South of the
subject property are citrus groves.
28
JUN 2 0 1984 BooK 57 FACE 490
JUN 20 1984
BOOK 57 FAGF.49
of the land around it as MD -1, Medium -Density Residential 1 (up
to 8 units/acre). The Agricultural zoning district does
conform to the MD -1 land use designation. Based on the
agricultural uses west and south of the subject property and
the Agricultural zoning of the property to the south;a
rezoning to the Agricultural District would be reasonable.
The proposed uses of the subject property, an agriculturally
oriented office and meeting hall, are allowed as special
exceptions in the Agricultural zoning district, provided that
they do not adversely affect adjacent land. At the present
time, the applicants could proceed with plans for their office
and meeting hall on the part of.the parcel of land located__
south of the subject property which is already zoned
Agricultural.
Transportation System
The subject property has direct access to State Road 60
(classified as an arterial street on the County's Thoroughfare
Plan). The development of the subject property for an office
and meeting hall should attract 21 average annual daily trips '
(AADT) .
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally
sensitive, nor is it in a flood=prone area.
i7ti 1 i ti ca¢
County water and wastewater facilities are not available for the
subject property. However; County water.facilities are
expected to be available in one year.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends approval.
Planning & Development Director Robert Keating
presented staff's recommendation for approval of this
rezoning request which would allow the Citrus League to
build an office building on the subject property.
Director Keating explained that if sometime in the
future the agricultural tenants move out, the office
building could not be used for uses not related to citrus or
agriculture.
John Morrison, representing the Citrus League, stated
he would be glad to respond to any questions, and confirmed
that it is their intent to use the building for agricultural
purposes. He assured the Commission that if there were
29
� � r
other offices constructed, they also would be agriculturally
oriented.
Chairman Scurlock opened the Public Hearing and asked
if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There were
none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board
unanimously (4-0) closed the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board
unanimously (4-0) adopted Ordinance 84-37,
providing for the rezoning of 2.24 acres owned
by the Indian River Citrus League from
Multiple -Dwelling District to Agricultural,
as outlined in the memo of May 14, 1984.
30
JUN 2 Q 198R0c5 5 7FA-H 492
:1 ,1 GC' f' ,(', C t'1 ,
BOOK 5 7 PA1E 4,93. r� }
ORDINANCE NO. 84-37
Vff=AS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to rezone the hereinafter
described property and pursuant thereto held a public hearing in relation
thereto, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, that the Zoning Ordinance of Indian River County, Florida,
and the accompanying Zoning Map, be amended as follows:
1. That the Zoning Map be changed in order that the following
described property situated in Indian River County, Florida,
to -wit:
The North 630 feet of the East 5 acres of the West 20 acres of Tract
11, Section 1, Township 33 South, Range 38 East, Indian River County,
Florida, according to the last general plat of lands of the Indian
River Farms Land Company Subdivision as recorded in Platbook 2,
Page 25 public records of St. Lucie County, Florida, said land now
lying and being in Indian River County, Florida, less rights-of-way of
record. Said land containing 2.24 acres.
Be changed from R-3, Multiple -Dwelling District, to A, Agricultural
District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in said
Zoning Regulations.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida on this 20th day of June, 1984.
BOARD OF COUNTY CONUSSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida this 2 5th
day of June , 1984.
Effective Date: Acknowledgment from the Department of State received on
this 29 day of June , 1984, at 1 lA.M./P.M. and filed in the office of
the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY.
RECOMMENDATION FOR WATER MASTER PLAN _
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/17/84:
TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PATE: May 17, 1984 FILE:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
0
THROUGH: Michael Wright
County Administrator SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL
SUBJECT: ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
EXPANDING & UPDATING OF
COUNTY WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN
FROM: Terrane. Pinto REFERENCES:
Utility Services Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The Selection Committee was instructed to receive proposals,
carry out interviews and make a recommendation for the selection
of a consulting engineer to provide engineering services for
expanding and updating the master plan for water service within
the south County area, State Road 60 corridor, and the north County
area.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES:
The Selection Committee comprised of:
Terrance Pinto
Jim Davis
Gary Brandenburg
Bob Keating
Mike Galanis
received nine proposals from consulting engineering firms and
requested interviews from five. Those five were: ,
Boyle Engineering Dyer, Riddle, Mills & Precourt
James M. Montgomery Lloyd & Associates
Gee & Jenson
The Committee analyzed the qualifications, experience, and Iricing
methodology of the above firms.
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend the Board authorize the Administrator and/or his
designee to negotiate the cost of the proposed project starting
with Boyle Engineering and if in fact a suitable fee cannot be
reached, be authorized to negotiate with Dyer, Riddle, Mills &
Precourt and proceed in same manner with James M. Montgomery if
in fact agreement cannot be reached with the number two firm.
31
JUN 2 1 . ; a.
BOOK 57 PAGE 494
JUN 2 0 1984 aoox 5 7 P,r P,E 495
Chairman Scurlock requested that in the future, staff
provide the Commission with information on each of the three
firms selected for negotiations, and Commissioner Wodtke
suggested that a Commissioner sit in during the selection
process.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, that the
Board authorize the Administrator and/or
his designee to negotiate the cost of the proposed
project, starting with Boyle Engineering, and if
in fact a suitable fee cannot be reached,
authorize negotiations with Dyer, Riddle, Mills &
Precourt and proceed in the same manner with James
M. Montgomery if agreement cannot be reached with
the #2 firm.
Under discussion, Utilities Director Pinto explained
that they had received five very good proposals and they
were quite impressed with all five firms. The three firms
selected for negotiations had better master plan abilities
than the other two. The Boyle firm was chosen because of
their expertise in water master planning and their mapping
and in-house computer abilities. He explained that our
project goes a little beyond the normal job because they
will also analyze our existing system and give us
information on any soft spots or pressure problems. He
noted that they have modified the Kentucky Program to
coincide with the experience they have had on projects
similar to ours.
Director Pinto explained that they would be considering
a 15-20 year plan, and while the entire north county would
be included in the stud those
y, parts
of the north county
where it is'likely development will not take place for
32
twenty years or so into the future probably could be easily_
eliminated.
Chairman Scurlock wanted to make sure that we talk to
the municipalities, such as Sebastian and Indian River
Shores, about water and Administrator Wright assured the
Commission that we will be talking water, sewer and roads,
and the County will exhaust every effort to make them aware
and get them to participate.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
The Motion was voted on and carried
unanimously (4-0).
CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR FLEET MANAGEMENT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/13/84:
TO: County Commissioners DATE: ,Tune 13, 1984 FILE:
FROM: Michael Wr jg�t
County Ad finistrator
IV
SUBJECT: Consultant Services
for Fleet Management
REFERENCES:
This is a request to investigate, and/or advertise for a consultant
to do an in-depth study of our present Fleet Management operation
with respect to facilities, operations, funding, record keeping,
employment practices, and billing procedures. We would want advice
as to the advisability of outside contracts as compared to our
current in-house operations.
Funding would come from those departments using these services P.s
shown on the attached sheet.
33
JUN 2 0 1984 BOOK 57 PPGE496
BOOK 57 Pm -H49,7 ,
r- JUN 2 0 1994
Administrator Wright stated that basically what he is
recommending is for someone to come in and give us an
outside appraisal on what we need to do with Fleet
Management to get it on a sound operating basis, as it is
currently running at a deficit. A consultant can also give
us an idea of how our operations compare to local private
and public operations.
Chairman Scurlock felt that something should be done
very quickly because participating constitutional officers
are actually paying more for car maintenance than they would
if they went to a privately -owned gas station.
Administrator Wright explained that the scope of
services would cover total operations, charges, staffing,
manpower, and the feasibility of farming out services.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, that the
Board accept the County Administrator's
recommendation to advertise for a consultant
to do an in-depth study of the operation of
Fleet Management, at an amount not to exceed
$10,000, and to come back to the Board; with
funding to come from the users.
Commissioner Lyons wished to see an allocation of
overhead for all County departments --the Attorney's time,
the Administrator's time, etc. -- and he wondered if the
consultant could also do this sort of a job. Administrator
Wright stated that we have an overhead report from our
auditor which has been applied to the enterprise accounts,
but we have not applied this to the MSTU. He thought the
Commissioners would be painfully aware of overhead
allocation in about 30 days because it will be a major
budget discussion.
34
� � r
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
The Motion was voted on and carried
unanimously (4-0).
IRC BID #204 - 1984 STANDARD 1/2 TON PICKUP TRUCK
The Board reviewed the following memos dated 6/8/84 and
6/15/84:
TO: Board of County Commissioners GATE: June 8, 1984 FILE:
THRU: Michael Wright SUBJECT: IRC Bid #204- (1) New 1984
County Administrator Standard 1/2 Ton Pickup Truck
FROM:
Carolyri,/Goodrich, Manager
Purchasing Department
1. Description and Conditions
REFERENCES:
Bids were received June 5, 1984 at 11:00 A.M. for IRC Bid #204- New 1984
Standard 1/2 Ton Pickup Truck for the Utilities Department.
17 Bid Proposals were sent out, 4 Bids were received.
2. Alternatives and Analysis
The low bid was submitted by Roger Whitley Chevrolet, Tampa, F1 for a 1984
_truck in the amount of $7575.00. A note was made on the bid that the price
is only good if the factory will accept the order. However, infr,rmation re-
ceived from the State of Florida regarding the State Contract and from other
dealers, the close out date for ordering 1984 1/2 Ton Pickups was April 3
for Dodge and May 8 for Chevrolet.
The second low bid was submitted by"Hill Schultz Chevrolet for a 1984 in the
amount of $7720.00. They stated in a letter attached to their bid that they
will try to match truck for truck equipment for equipment as close as possible.
This would be from stock. 1984 trucks are no longer available ort the State
Contract.
1985 vehicles do not go into production until August 1, and delivery would be
at least 90 days.
3. Recommendation and Funding
It is recommended that IRC Bid #204 be awarded to the second low bidder, Bill
Schultz Chevrolet, in the amount of $7720.00 for a 1984 Chevrolet 1/2 Ton
Pickup Track.
Funds to come from Renewal and Replacement.
35
JUN 20 1984 snox 57 Pt..GE 4l8
JUN 2 0 1984
BOOT( 57 PAGE 49
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 15, 1984 FILE:
THRU: Michael Wr tit SUBJECT: ADDENDUM - IRC Bid #204 -(1) New
County Adm' ' trator 1984 Standard 1/2 Ton Pickup Truck
FROM: -` '1�� REFERENCES:
Carolyn,lGoodrich, Manager
Purchasing Department
ADDENDUM TO RECOMMENDATION
At our request, Dave Mellott of Roger Whitley Chevrolet talked
with the factory regarding acceptance of an order after close
out date. `He was told they would probably accept the order.
Staff would like to amend the recommendation to award to the
low bidder, Roger Whitley Chevrolet, contingent upon acceptance
of the order by the factory. If factory will not accept order,
award to second low bidder, Bill Schultz Chevrolet.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously approved the recommendation of
staff and awarded Bid #204 to the low bidder,
Roger Whitley Chevrolet, in the amount of
$7575, for a 1984 standard 1/2 ton pickup truck;
contingent upon acceptance of the order by the
factory; and if they cannot produce, authorized
staff to go to the next low bidder, Bill Schultz
Chevrolet.
36
BOARD OF COUNTY COfV)WSSwVERS
Vero1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960'
' BID TABULATION
QJ
v v
1 �N
a ,^
O.
RC BID #204
tI
�OPENING
DA�e5
JuCIO
BID TITLE
(1) New 1984 Standard 1/2- T.P/U TK
ITEM DESCRIPTION
NO.
UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICIEUNr; PRICE UNIT PRICE
------T—
UNIT PRICE
1. (1) New 1984 Standard 1/2 Ton
1984
1985
1984 1984
Pickup Truck.
8454
00
7944
55� 7575 1001
7720
00
1985
2. Days required for delivery after
.
7800
00
7—
Days
3/days
90 da
s
1984
from45
D
77da
s
I
I
8-1-8
1985
f rorr�
Au .
1
only
good
if factory
will a
ce
t
order
16th STREET BIKE PATH - CHANGE ORDER #3
Darrell McQueen of Lloyd & Associates, Inc, distributed
copies of a request for a change order which would change
the bike path on 16th Street from a-sphalt to concrete. He
explained that the master plan for the 16th Street
improvements project called for a bike path on the north
side of the street and a sidewalk on the south side.
People, however, are beginning to walk on the north side
along with the kids on bicycles. He recommended that the
bike path extend from 20th AVe, to U.S. #1. They have put a
37
JUN 2 0 1994 a-901 7Alu�500
I
JUN 2 0 1984 Box 57 rf:j_ 1
501
concrete "bikewalk" on the north side of 16th Street from
. 20th Avenue to 29th Avenue to complete that section of the
walkway for the children to get to school. It is a sub bike
path standard, but it is a sidewalk, i.e., a bike path is 5
feet wide as compared to an 8 -ft. wide sidewalk. Mr.
McQueen pointed out that they had put in a bikewalk for the
City on 17th Street extension over on the south beach
parking lot. A sign was posted listing it as a "bikewalk",
and it has worked out pretty well. The reason he is
recommending concrete is that grass will grow up through
asphalt, the edges would ravel, and it is difficult to
create a pleasing appearance with asphalt.
Commissioner Bird thought walkers and cyclists could
co -exist, but he didn't want to run into any problems with
the DOT.
Mr. McQueen believed that the book on bike paths was a
recommendation only, and not a cut and dried mandated
regulation.
Chairman Scurlock felt that the asphalt paths that have
been built in the past are a mess as far as maintenance
goes.
Mr. McQueen estimated that the concrete bike path
would cost about $2 a sq. yd. more than asphalt with
limerock and $3 more for asphalt and coquina. However, he
did not recommend that we put in concrete bike paths
everywhere.
Commissioner Wodtke noted that other communities have
been designating bike paths on the right-hand side of
streets. While he realized that these paths are not as safe
as off the road paths, he wondered if this is something that
should be considered as an alternative.
Mr. McQueen did not feel it would be a good idea for
_ . this path, but was an idea that could be considered for
other roads in the future.
38
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird,
SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, that the
Board approve Change Order #3 on the 16th
Street Improvements Project, as recommended
by staff.
Commissioner Lyons was disturbed that the completion
date of the 16th Street improvements project has been
creeping up and wanted to know when it is going to be
completed; he pointed out that originally it was to be
completed by September. Administrator Wright reminded the
Board that the contractor received an extension, and the
completion date is now October 1, and Mr. McQueen stated
that the project would be completed by the beginning of the
school semester, except for the parking lots around the ball
parks. Commissioner Bird thought that was going to cause
utter chaos at the opening football game in the fall.
Mr. McQueen advised that he would have a project
completion schedule prepared in time for discussion at the
meeting of July 11.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
The Motion was voted on and carried
unanimously (4-0).
JUN 20 1984
39
BOOK a F,aGE.502
JUN 2 0 1994
Owner's Project No.
e00K;7 Fa„503
CHANGE ORDER
NO. 3
Dated June 20, 1984
8105 Engineer's Project No. 82-233
Project 16th Street Traffic Improverrents
Owner Indina River Count
Contractor Dickerson Florida. Inc. Contract Date
Contract For 16th Street Traffic Lrovements
To:
Dickerson Florida, Inc.
Contractor
You are directed to make the changes noted below in the subject contract:
Owner INDIAN RIVER COUN'T'Y
By:
Date
Nature of the Change: See attached sheet
Enclosures:
Page 1 of 3 Pages
40
M M r
M M M
The changes result in the following adjustment of Contract Price and Time:
Contract Price Prior to this Change Order $ 2,241,262.26
Net (Increase) G0=M9= ) resulting from this Change Order $ 22,353.30
Current Price Including This Change Order, S 2,263,615.56
Contract Time Prior to this Change Order -510- Calendar Days.
Net (Increase) (Decrease) resulting from this -0- Calendar Days
Change Order
Current Contract time including this Change
Order
The above changes are approved:
-510- Calenday Days
Engineer _
By: c
Date: June 20, 1984
The above changes are accepted: DICMMSON FLORIDA, INC.
Contrator
APPro`�edi a +orm
and legal icienc
oU�y ' Mey
JUN 2 01994
By:
Date:L 0 '
ACCE ED BY:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY -
Date: 4?r
2 7/1f .
page Z of 3 Pages
57 PAGE 50 �
JUN, 2 0 1984
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
16TH STREET TRAFFIC LMPROVa=S
Change Order No. 3
Breakdown Sheet
DELETE E THE FOI. VItiG FRCYM :
Oricrinal Contract Items
Book 5 7 PAGE 5®5
332-2
asphaltic Concrete Type II
313 Tons
@
$38.00/Ton
$11,894.00
Chance Order No.
1
200-1-1A
Coquina Base (6" Primed)
7015 S.Y.
@
$3.84/S.Y.
26,937.60
332-2
Asphaltic Concrete Type II
(12th St. & 20th Ave.)
10.75 Tons
@
$38.00/Ton
408.50
200=1-1A
Coquina Base (6" Primed)
(12th St. & 24th Ave.)
215 S.Y.
@
$3.84/S.Y.
825.60
TOTAL DELETIONS:
$40,065.70
ADD ME FOLLOWING:
522-1 Concrete Sidewalk (4" thick) 6475 S.Y. @ $9.64/S.Y. $62,419.00
TOTAL ADDITIONS: $62,419.00
TCTAL ADDITIONS: $62,419.00
Less:
TOML DELETIONS: - 40,065.70
NET CONTRACT
INCREASE: $221353.30
page 3 of 3 Pages
LEASE/PURCHASE OF NEW IBM COPIER
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/12/84:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: June 12, 1984 FILE:
the Board of County
Commissioners
THRU: L. S. "Tommy" Tho s j URJECT: Request for Lease -Purchase
Intergovernment / of new IBM Copier
Coordinator 1 I
FROM:Lynn Williams
Building & Grounds
REFERENCES:
Superintendent
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION
Presently the Central Copy Room serving the Administration
Building is equipped with an IBM Model 20 Copier. This copier
was purchased on a 60 month purchase agreement with IBM in 1979.
The Model 20 is designed to handle an average of 25,000 to
35,000 copies per month. We have averaged 70,000 copies per
month on our IBM Model 20, since the beginning of fiscal year
83-84.
Over ,the last two years we have experienced considerable
difficulty with our present machine, mainly attributed to the
very heavy load. All repair work and normal maintenance is
covered by a service agreement with IBM. However, the charges
for monthly service are based on a set copy volume of 20,000
copies and escalates as usage rises above this point. The
pricing structure of the Service Agreement was changed in
September, 1983 where by all copies above 20,000 per month cost
$.02 each.
Copy usage has jumped dramatically since the beginning of the
fiscal year. Code Enforcement, the addition of the Building
Department, Emergency Management and increased efforts in
Personnel have all impacted the usage demand to•a point where it
is no longer economically advantagous to continue with our
present situation. Our present volume is twice the recommended
usage level for the Model 20 Copier.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
In September, 1983 the Board authorized staff to negotiate with
IBM or other manufacturers for a copier better suited to our
needs. Staff investigated further the copiers available on the
market which could handle the present usage as well as future
growth.
We received proposals from both IBM and Xerox for copiers
specifically designed for 100,000 plus copies per month.
Morse's Printing, the local Xerox representative, proposed a
Xerox, Model 1075 Copier/Duplicator at a cost of $53,102.
Monthly service agreement charges are similar to those of IBM
outlined earlier. Staff feels this is simply out of our price
range.
IBM has offered a package, outlined below, for a Model 60
Copier/Duplicator. Actual cash purchase price would be $28,917.
43
JUN 2 0 1994 poor F�,cF 50
JUN 2 0 1984BOQK P,507
CT
IBM has proposed the following:
a. Install a Model 60 IBM Copier/Duplicator for a 30 day
free trial.
b. After the 30 day free trial, the County would enter
_ into a 60 month purchase agreement for purchase of the
IBM Copier.
C. Accept our present Model 20 as a trade-in on the
purchase of a Model 60. The trade-in allowance is
$1,525. The original purchase price of this machine -
five (5) years ago was $27,724.
Staff feels the following factors justify purchase of the Model
60 IBM Copier/Duplicator.
a. Reduced cost - At our present copier usage level
(75,000 copies per month) the existing Model 20 _
Maintenance and Copy Agreement will cost $1,596 per
month. The same volume (75,000 copies per month) on
the new Model 60 will cost $641 per month. This
computes to an annual savings of $11,460, in
maintenance and copy costs. The same grade paper is
used by both machines. The toner which actually makes
the print on the copy is $22 per cartridge less for the
Model 60 than for the Model 20. An annual savings of
approximately $300.
b. Increased capability - The IBM Model 60 has been
designed for copier users in the range of 25,000 to
125,000 copies per month. This range allows for
considerable growth and will handle our needs for the
next three to five years. Our present copier is in
excess of five years old, technilogically, and no
longer can handle our copy load nor has the copy
features needed in our operation.
C. Thirty (30) Day Free Trial - The thirty day free trial
will reduce the average monthly cost for the remainder °
of the fiscal year to $625 per month. The present
monthly cost is $1,596.
Beginning Fiscal 84-85 the monthly cost for the new
Model 60 Copier will be approximately $.1,250 (purchase,
copy and maintenance) as opposed to $1,596 per month
for the existing machine. An annual projected savings
of $4,152.
If the purchase is approved for immediate delivery where our
exising copier can be traded in right away we will save
additional payments due on the existing purchase agreement.
ALTERNATIVE A
Approve IBM 30 Day Free Trial, for immediate delivery. Execute
a 60 month purchase agreement with IBM accepting the existing
Model 20 as a trade-in.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Alternative "A".
44
Administrator Wright explained that he has put this. -
item off for nine months while staff did further research
and has now agreed to bring it before the Board.
Intergovernmental Relations Director Tommy Thomas
commented that Lynn Williams, Building & Grounds
Superintendent, has really done a thorough job in
researching this matter and found that it would be more
economical to go with a new copier. Director Thomas did not
personally'think that we can take a 5 -year old piece of
machinery, which has been overworked, and recondition it to
a point where it is reliable and cost efficient. He
compared copiers to automobiles and other appliances which
have a built-in obsolescence factor.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, that the Board
approve staff's recommendation to approve the
30 -day free trial on the IBM Model 60 with
immediate delivery; with the understanding that
staff will try to sell our present IBM Model 20
for a higher price than the $1500 trade-in offered
by IBM.
Commissioner Wodtke thought that we had bought the
present copier on a lease with option to purchase in 1979,
and wondered how many months we have left on that agreement.
Administrator Wright stated that it will be up in Sept. or
October. He noted that the new machine would be an outright
purchase, but we have an option to lease only.
Commissioner Wodtke asked just what the cost would be -
for just leasing it as compared to buying it and Director
Thomas explained that leasing would run a little less, but
there again, copy prices may be increased in the future.
45
JUN 2 0 1984 BOOK 57 Fr. r 508
JUN 2 0 1984
BOOK 57 F,,r.509
Chairman Scurlock believed that IBM has run their
numbers and have got us either way.
Commissioner Wodtke wanted to be assured that this copy
machine will give us the best service usage for the next 3-5
years and OMB Director Jeff Barton stated this machine would
give us that service.
Director Thomas explained that Director Barton has
figured this all out and feels that we would still come out
ahead on a purchase agreement. It is possible we might find
that we made a bad decision if significant technical
improvements occur during the next two years, but the fact
is that we are now at a point where we cannot continue with
the present copier.
It was agreed that the decision to lease or purchase
would not be decided today, but at budget time, and after
the 30 -day free trial.
Lynn Williams advised that IBM would be charging us
for the use of our old machine during the trial period, and
Director Thomas prefaced this with the fact that IBM has
this all figured out with their "big" computer.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
The Motion was voted on and carried
unanimously (4-0).
NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
The Board of County Commissioners recessed at 11:05
o'clock A.M. in order that the District Board of the South
County Fire District might convene. Those Minutes are being
prepared separately.
The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 11:07
o'clock A.M. with the same members present, Commissioner
Bowman being absent.
46
M M
FINANCING - S.R. 60 WATERLINE
Utilities Director Terry Pinto noted that the
Commission had authorized the awarding of bids on the SR -60
waterline as soon as we had concurrence with the Farmers
Home Administration. It is necessary to get all of our
information to Farmers Home Administration within the next
week in order to obtain a Guide 1-A Commitment Letter for
Financing, which is a triggering mechanism for our existing
$2.7 million financing. If we don't get all this material
to FHA and do not receive Guide 1-A before July 1st, it
triggers a call on those notes and we would have to reissue
them.
Administrator Wright explained that $2 -million of this
project will go with the $2.7 million being put in by the
developers. The developers really won't have the ability to
get their money until they go through a legal process that
will not culminate for approximately 60 days.
Attorney Brandenburg explained that the rub in this
whole matter is that FHA wants the County to let the
contracts out for the entire job and the County does not
have enough money to to that. All we have is $871,000 of the
$2.4 million necessary for the contract. So, in fact, the
County is signing a contract for $2.4 million when there is
only $871,000 in the bank.
The County Attorney continued that when this was
discussed last week, consideration was given to inserting
some language in the FHA contracts with these individual
developers that would allow those contracts to lapse in the
event that the SR -60 assessment issue was not approved.
Director Pinto has been talking with the people from FHA,
and he does not feel they will go along with that approach
because in the event the contracts collapse, a certain
amount of the' $81=1-000 would have been wasted on improvements
put into the ground that could not be used. In order to
avoid refinancing the notes that we have outstanding, we
47 BOOK 57 Ft;up510
JUN 20 1984
I
JUN 2 01984
BOOK - 57 't� J 511
have to find a mechanism to enter into the contracts and
commit the County to $2.4 million, and at the same time
assure the County that the balance of the $871,000 will be
available should the assessment bonds fail. He felt there
were two ways to do this;
1) To go back to West County Utilities and ask them for a
letter of credit for their entire obligation of $2 -million
which would provide absolute assurance to the County. The
letter of credit would be written so that in the event the
assessment issue was not sold to Florida National Bank by
September 1, 1984, the County then would have the ability to
call down that letter of credit and use the $2 -million to
build the project. That would involve certain costs to the
utility and Attorney Brandenburg wasn't sure whether they
would want to do that.
2) Enter into a contract with West County Utilities and
their participating individuals that in the event the
assessment revenue bond issue is not in place and bought by
Florida National Bank, then each of them individually within
a 10 -day period will come up with their $970.45 per
equivalent residential unit that they have reserved. That
would produce the $2 -million which the County would need to
finish the contract. Under the contract, the County has an
agreement with them to come up with those funds. All the
developers want this project to go as their development
plans are contingent upon the project being completed, and
they originally agreed to come up with that money up front.
In either event, the developers are getting what they
bargained for, and the only thing they would be losing out
on is the interest break that the County has been trying to
benefit them with by virtue of assessment.
The County Attorney recommended the irrevocable letter
of credit. As an alternative, he reported that an agreement
is being prepared which should accomplish the second
48
alternative. The utility will be meeting on Friday _
afternoon to consider this issue, but this Commission does
not have another meeting between now and next Tuesday when
the material must be into the FHA in order to give us the
1-A commitment letter by July 1, 1984.
Commissioner Bird preferred the letter of credit
because we could get the money back instantly if there is a
default, as compared to the second alternative where the
developers sign individual contracts and possibly could lead
to litigation to receive payment.
Attorney Brandenburg confirmed that was the obvious
disadvantage, and it had to be weighed against the desire of
these developers to have this project built and their
trustworthiness with the County. He advised that the
contract is written so that in the event any of the
participants did not come up with their share to the County,
it would be the obligation of West Utilities, Inc. itself,
to come up with that participant's share.
Commissioner Wodtke also preferred the letter of
credit, and asked when the money would become available.
Attorney Brandenburg stated he has scheduled the validation
for the assessment for July 30 at 3:00 p.m. and there is a
30 -day appeal period. By September 1, we ought to be able
to close on the bonds with Florida National Bank. The
letter of credit would be needed for approximately 60-90
days.
Administrator Wright felt we needed an alternative on
this matter.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke,
SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board
unanimously (4-0) authorized the County
Administrator, County Attorney and staff to
obtain the necessary security to close with
49
JUN 2 0 1994 soox 57
L-
BOOK 5.6 FF,JE 513 ,
Farmers Home Administration on the contract for
the SR -60 waterline project, giving preference to
an irrevocable letter of credit; however, other
means of surety could be negotiated with the
individual property owners or West Utilities,
Inc., as long as necessary security is obtained
to get the Farmers Home Administration letter of
commitment; and authorized the Chairman's
signature to the necessary documents.
PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT - TENNIS COURTS AT
GIFFORD PARK
Commissioner Bird explained that last year at budget
time, $10,000 was allocated for capital improvements at
Gifford Park. The Parks & Recreation Committee asked the
Gifford Park Advisory Committee for their recommendation as
to how that money should be spent. After a long delay, they
came back with a recommendation that a tennis court was most
needed at Gifford Park. Intergovernmental Relations
Director Tommy Thomas thought we might be able to come up
with $10,000 in matching funds through the DNR whereby we
could build a double tennis court. He explained that he has
it in writing that this is an eligible DNR project and funds
are available at present. The County has sufficient funds
in the new fund which the Commission established for the
development of parks to go ahead and proceed with
construction of the courts. We would need to draw out
$12,000 along with the $10,000 already budgeted, which would
enable us to build a double court. The building of a single
tennis court costs $13,000-$15,000, whereas a double court
would cost approximately $22,000. There is a timing
problem, however, as the courts should be completed so that
they can be in use by late summer.
50
M
Commissioner Bird felt that it actually boils down to -
the fact that we have $10,000 already budgeted in another
account and need to borrow $12,000 from the special park
fund, with the thought that we will replace that $10,000 out
of the $12,000 that we are borrowing when we receive the DNR
money.
Director Thomas did not think he is in a position to
guarantee that we will get that $12,000 back in grant money,
but, he felt we had a very good chance. He reminded the
Commission that the DNR is not very speedy in these matters.
We could receive the money in 60 days, but then again, it
might take four months.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board
unanimously (4-0) authorized the construction
of a double tennis court in Gifford Park and
requested staff to pursue DNR funds with the
understanding that the project will be temporarily
funded from the special parks fund and that the
County will fund it completely if DNR funds are
not received.
TRANSPORTATION & PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
Commissioner Lyons read the following Summary of
Actions of the Meeting of June 12, 1984:
JUN 2 0 1984 51 Bm. 57 F�.:r 51 4
JUN 2 0 1994 Boor. 57 FAGE515
1.
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE
June 12, 1984
Signalization - U.S. 1 at CR 510:
Committee approved staff recommendation to close access
of 85th Street and U.S. 1 necessary for efficient and
safe operation of the planned traffic signal. Formal
access closure will be processed by the Planning
Department.
2. Rerouting of CR 507, City of Fellsmere:
Committee agreed to table this issue until members had
an opportunity to perform an on-site review of this
problem. Discussion will be held at the next Committee
meeting.
3. Functional Classification of Roads:
Committee heard report of proposed method to
functionally classify roads by the FDOT. The County
will have opportunities to review specific proposed
classifications during late 1984 and early 1985.
4. Old Winter Beach Road Bridgehead:
Committee recommends official survey and marking of this
right-of-way between Jungle Trail and the Indian River.
Commissioner Lyons reported that the Committee
recommends the.widening of CR -512 and is requesting that the
County take some positive action for obtaining the right-
of-way. He noted that most of the old railroad right-of-way
has been sold or is up for sale. Roland Miller claims he
owns it and has phoned repeatedly to see if the County is
interested in obtaining that right-of-way. Commissioner
Lyons felt that Mr. Miller would accept the appraised
evaluation of the property, and he requested that the Board
give him and staff the authority to pursue obtaining the
right-of-way for CR -512, from U.S. #1 to I-95, at least.
The County is looking for at least 60 feet of right-of-way;
enough for another major thoroughfare, such as SR -60. The
Committee feels this project is very important because of
_ the growth in development in that area.
52
� � r
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, _
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) authorized Commissioner Lyons
and staff to begin negotiations with appropriate
property owners to acquire the necessary
right-of-way on CR -512, and come back to the
Board.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
Chairman Scurlock reported that he is presently
considering individuals for appointment to the Economic
Development Committee, the formation of which was just
recently authorized by the Board.
FINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
Chairman Scurlock reported that they met this week
and after lengthy discussion, their recommendation to this
Commission is to approve a 1 -cent, one-year, 1984-1985 sales
tax increase as the primary funding source to construct the
$4.3 million jail facility. They further recommended that
if a shortfall does occur and additional monies are
required, the matter would come back before them for their
recommendation. If the voters choose not to endorse that
approach, other financing methods that would not exceed a
5 -year period would be considered.
Administrator Wright reported that it appears that we
are looking at an expansion within five years of the
completion of the construction of this facility.
Commissioner Wodtke asked that the Commission be given
additional tax information for their review, and set a -
timetable so we can get this on the general election in
November.
Attorney Brandenburg advised that he is checking to see
if we can place it on the September election. He stressed
53
JUN 2 0 1984 BOOK 57 m, 516
JUN
2 0
1994
BOOK
57
PnE 517
that
the contract for construction must be in place
by
January lst if the County is going to fund this with a sales
tax, and Administrator Wright stated that what we are facing
is proceeding with the jail and not having the firm
financing in place until possibly November.
Chairman Scurlock emphasized that we have to formulate
an education process so that the voters know how much it
would cost to build the jail with a sales tax as opposed to
alternate financing methods. This would allow them to make
an intelligent decision on how the jail should be funded.
Commissioner Wodtke expressed the wish to see material
on what effect this is going to have on the average
taxpayer.
REDESIGNATION OF I-95 TO "VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY"
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/13/84:
TO: 130,M of CO CO DATE: 13 Jun 84 FILE: _
ADMINISTRATOR
COUNTY ATT.01 'Y
12-0 oMITE CO CO OFFICE
SUBJECT: REDES-IGNATION OF STAITH 1i0^.D
I-95 TO "VETERANS M-161ORIAI,
HIGM-1AY"
..OUNTY T.,RANS SVS OFA' REFERENCES: ATTACHED CORPJ'SPONDE14C
(Martin County)
This county's veterans organizations and this office highly recommends
approval of the Indian River County segment of State Road I-95 to the
"Veterans Memorial Highway
To the correspondence in the hands of the addressees, I have added a
memo from Sherri King, a member of the Martin County Board of CountyCommissioners, to that group as a whole.
Also a proposed plaque to be at the entry and exit of the (now) State
Road I-0.5. Almost all of the counjies with portions of I-95 within
their county boundries have already; concurred in this matter. Ali
are expected to agree.
JERKY R. CCOKI JR
C. V..0.
Indian River County
54
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, _
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the
Board unanimously (4-0) adopted Resolution
84-44, supporting the adoption of legislation
dedicating I-95 to the Veterans of the United
States Armed Services.
Jerry Cook of the Veterans Administration reported that
Administrator Wright thought that the County could come up
with the $300 to pay for the six plaques to be placed at the
Vero Beach on and off ramps.
55
JUN 2 0 1984
BOOK 57 PACE518
JUN 2 0 1984
aOCK �7 P H 519
RESOLUTION NO. 84-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEDICATING I-95 TO
THE VETERANS OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED SERVICES
WHEREAS, the Veterans of the Armed Services have given of
themselves to serve their country; and
WHEREAS, there have been Veterans who have sacrificed their
lives, their health, or their livelihood as a result of their
military service, and
WHEREAS, it seems only fitting and just to honor these
persons who have done so much to protect the "Life, Liberty and
Pursuit of Happiness" we all so freely enjoy; and
WHEREAS, the heroism of these same Veterans is all too
quickly forgotten; and
WHEREAS, we feel that the Veterans of the Armed Services
are truly deserving of recognition for risking their lives in
fulfilling their military obligation:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. This Board support the adoption of legislation
dedicating I-95 to the Veterans of the United States Armed
Services.
2. This Board request the Department of Transportation, the
Legislative Delegation and the Legislature of the State of
Florida, to support and adopt legislation dedicating I-95 to the
Veterans of the United States Armed Services.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Lyons
who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Wodtke and, upon being put to a vote, the votes was as follows:
Chairman Don
C. Scurlock, Jr.
Aye
Vice Chairman Patrick B.
Lyons
Aye
Commissioner
Richard N.
Bird
Aye
Commissioner
Margaret. C.
Bowman
Absent
Commissioner
William C.
Wodtke, Jr.
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 20th day of June, 1984.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY: C
DON C. SCURLOCK, JR.
Chairman
ATTEST:
FREPA.,WRIGHT, Cl k
APPROVED A T ,FORM
AND LEGAL F EN
ti
BY:
ENBURG
Cnty Attorne
APPOINTMENT TO DISTRICT IX HEALTH PLANNING COUNCIL
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/8/84:
TO: County Commissicners DATE: June 8, 1984 FILE:
SUBJECT: Appointment to
District IX Health
Planning Council
FROM: Alice White REFERENCES:
We received a call from Ed Holloway, District IX Health Planning
Council. He requested the County Commission to make an appointment
to the Health Council before July 1, 1984 if at all possible, as
Mr. J. B. Norton will no longer be serving after June 30.
(305-845-6070)
It was announced that OMB Director Jeff Barton would be
attending his last meeting of the District IX Mental Health
Board tonight, and it was suggested that he be appointed to -
the Health Planning Council, perhaps just temporarily.
Commissioner Wodtke reported that he had talked to Mr.
Norton about finding someone to fill his seat on the
council, but since the County Commissioners have only
57
JUN 20 1984 sooK 57 FF,,E520
JUN 20 1984 BOOK 57 FF",JE51
received two letters from individuals indicating an interest
to serve, he asked Mr. Norton to consider staying on for a
60 -day period or up until such time that the Commission can
appoint a qualified person.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke,
SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board
unanimously (4-0) approved a 60 -day extension of
service by J. B. Norton on the District
IX Mental Health Board until such time that an
appropriate candidate is found.
Commissioner Wodtke stated that Attorney Gregory Gore
also has shown an interest in serving on this Board and
perhaps he could meet with Mr. Norton and discuss the
requirements.
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board
unanimously (4-0) adopted Resolution 84-42,
commending the Indian River County Emergency
MedicaL Services Advisory Committee; also known as
the EMS Council for extraordinary efforts in
completing the committee's mission.
Commissioner Lyons requested that a letter of thanks be
sent to all those who have served on the council since its
beginning in December, 1981.
58
I
RESOLUTION NO. 84-42
A RESOLUTION OF"THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, COMMENDING THE INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY
COMMITTEE; ALSO KNOWN AS THE EMS COUNCIL FOR
EXTRAORDINARY EFFORTS IN COMPLETING THE COMMITTEE'S
MISSION.
WHEREAS, the Emergency Medical Services Advisory
Committee, also known as the Emergency Medical Services Council,
was created by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida on the 16th day of December, 1981 by the County
Commission to evaluate the needs, community support and medical
necessity for an Emergency Medical Service Program, and
WHEREAS, the Committee diligently commenced their
task and held numerous meetings and spent countless hours
completing the mission assigned by the County Commission, and
WHEREAS, the Committee has provided the County and its
residents with invaluable help in coordinating the introduction of
the 911 System and in helping to rid the system of its problems,
and
WHEREAS, the Committee has served to coordinate the
provision of emergency services and has been utilized to moderat=•e
disputes between various jurisdictions.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that.;
1. The members of the Emergency Medical Services
Advisory Committee, a/k/a EMS Council, are commended for their
outstanding contribution to the community in completing their
mission, and
2. Having completed its function in an exemplary
manner, the committee is hereby dissolved.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Lyons who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Wodtke and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was
as follows:
Chairman Don
C. Scurlock, Jr.
Aye
Vice Chairman
Patrick B.
Lyons
Aye
Commissioner
Richard N.
Bird
Aye
Commissioner
Margaret C.
Bowman
Absent
Commissioner
William C.
Wodtke, Jr.
Aye
JUN 2 0 1984 -1-
Bo f 57 �AGE522
JUN 2 0 1994 Boas 5 7 PA, cF 5.213
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly
passed and adopted this 20th day of June , 1984.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By �U.� C
zc�el-
DON C. SCURLOCK, JR.
Chairman
1
Attest:����"L�!h
FREDA WRIGHT
Clerk
APPROVED -S-�0 FORM AND LEGAL
SUFFICI
�ouM BRANDENBUtG
t Attorney
FORMATION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATING COMMITTEE
Commissioner Lyons explained that there is a need to
have a forum for coordination of service and the problems
that arise from time to time in response received through
the 911 system. He noted that he has prepared a proposed
resolution and wanted to revise Item #2 where it states that
"members and appointments of the committee shall be
determined from time to time by the Commissioner", to read:
"by the Commissioner assigned to 911 system coordinating
responsibilities."
Commissioner Lyons wanted very much to have a committee
formed, which would consist of either the Chief or the
Assistant Chief of all the fire departments, ambulance
squads and the Sheriff's Dept. and which would include the
necessary representatives from County Administration and
Emergency Management. The committee would simply be called
together when there is a problem, such as changing the
sectors in 911.
Commissioner Lyons requested that the Commission give
him the authority for this committee until such time that
.o
another member of the Commission is appointed the _
Coordinator.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board
unanimously (4-0) adopted Resolution 84-43,
creating the Emergency Services Coordinating
Committee, with the amendments as noted.
61
JUN 20 1984 aooK 57 PA,�E52
JUN 2 0 1994
BOOK 57 F c: 5?5
RESOLUTION NO. 84-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CREATING THE EMERGENCY
SERVICES COORDINATING COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, it has become apparent to the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that a Coordinating
Committee is necessary to discuss and help resolve problems that
occur from time to time with the various jurisdictions and
entities that provide emergency services in our County.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
1. The County Commission hereby creates Indian River
County Emergency Services Coordinating Committee with the
following responsibilities:
a. To help mediate and resolve communication
problems that may arise between the various jurisdiction and
entities that provide emergency services to our County, including
problems which may arise with respect to the 911 System.
b. To coordinate "dual response" problems that
arise between services providing jurisdictions and entities.
c. To make recommendations to help avoid and
resolve jurisdictional conflicts in providing emergency services.
2. The number of members and the appointments to the
Committee shall be determined from time to time by the
Commissioners assigned as the 911 coordinator, from organizations
involved in the 911 System.
3. This Committee shall exist until dissolved by motion
and majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Lyons who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Wodtke and,
upon being put
to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Don
C. Scurlock, Jr.
Aye
Vice Chairman Patrick B.
Lyons
Aye
_ Commissioner
Richard N.
Bird
Aye
Commissioner
Margaret C.
Bowman
Absent
Commissioner
William C.
Wodtke, Jr.
Aye
_1 -
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly
passed and adopted this 20th day of June , 1984.
Attest: ` -)
FREDA WRIGHT
Clerk
APPROVED
AND LEGA
By
ty At
TO FORM
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF IN IAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
DON—C. SCURLOCK, JR
Chairman
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES - DR. FRAZIER
The Board reviewed the following drafted letter:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
D R A F T
Telephone: (305) 567-8000
June 15, 1984
William H. Frazier, M.D.
31 Royal Palm Boulevard
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: Agreement for Consulting Services
Dear Dr. Frazier:
Suncom Telephoner{305)424-1012
The Board of County Commissioners would like to take this
opportunity to commend you for the fine service you have provided
this Commission and the residents of Indian River County. You
have provided the Emergency Medical Services Council. with your
insight and guidance on providing emergency medical services for
our County. Much, if not the majority of the time you have spent
63
JUN 2 0 1984 8005 7 P" UE596
JUN 2 0 1994
BOOK 57
P1,E 597
oit this project, has been as an unpaid volunteer. The Commission
greatly appreciates your efforts and hopes that they will continue
in the future.
The County now desires to close our records on the outstanding
contract so that we may proceed with a clean slate. Please accept
this letter as the County's intent to terminate our Consulting
Agreement under Paragraph 5 of our Agreement.
Indian River County looks forward to your continued interest and
participation in providing our residents with the best possible
emergency medical care.
Sincerely yours,
Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Chairman, Indian River County
Board of Commissioners
Commissioner Lyons requested that the above letter be
sent to Dr. Frazier thanking him for his services and asked
the Commissioners to sign it.
Commissioner.Bird asked if we were finished with Dr.
Frazier, and Commissioner Lyons answered that we are
finished with him as a paid consultant; he had a contract
and we want to thank him for his contract. He is a very
active volunteer with the ambulance squad.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the
Board unanimously (4-0) authorized the
Chairman's signature on a letter
to Dr. Frazier, as requested by
Commissioner Lyons.
SCHEDULING OF JULY 3, 1984 MEETING
The Board agreed to call a Special Meeting for July 3,
1984 at 10:00 o'clock A.M.
64
The several bills and accounts against the County . _
having been audited were examined and found to be correct
were approved and warrants issued in settlement of same as
follows: Treasury Fund Nos. 10683 - 10867 inclusive. Such
bills and accounts being on file in the Office of the Clerk
of the Circuit Court, the warrants so issued from the
respective bonds being listed in the Supplemental Minute
Book as provided by the rules of the Legislative Auditor,
reference to such record and list so recorded being made a
part of these Minutes.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made,
seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 11:45 o'clock
A.M.
Attest:
Clerk Chairman
65
JUN ' �9�4 BOOK 57 PA E 5?8