Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-017ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - 017 AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT BY UPDATING THE COUNTY'S 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (CIP) SCHEDULE AND RELATED DATA AND ANALYSIS SECTIONS; AND PROVIDING SEVERABILITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan on February 13, 1990, and WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3177(3)(b) requires an annual review and update of the County's Capital Improvements Program; and WHEREAS, F.S. 163.3177(3)(b) exempts amendments to the County's 5 year CIP from the standard comprehensive plan amendment process and instead allows the County to amend the County's 5 year CIP schedule and related data and analysis sections by ordinance through the County's standard ordinance adoption procedures, which involve holding only one public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, pursuant to F.S.125.66(2), advertised for a Public Hearing to Consider Adopting an Ordinance Amending the County's 5 year CIP schedule and related data and analysis sections of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held an Adoption Public Hearing on December 1, 2015, at which parties in interest and citizens were heard; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that: SECTION 1. Amendment to the Schedule of Capital Improvements Program Indian River County hereby adopts the 5 year CIP schedule and related data and analysis section of the Capital Improvements Element; (Exhibit A). SECTION 2. Financial Feasibility The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed amendment of the 5 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - 017 year CIP schedule and related data and analysis section of the Capital Improvements Element is financially feasible. SECTION 3. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 5. Severability It is declared to be the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that, if any provision of this ordinance is for any reason finally held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions. SECTION 6. Effective Date A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Department of State by the clerk of the Board of County Commissioners within 10 days of enactment by the Board of County Commissioners and shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Press -Journal on the 16th day of November, 2015, for a public hearing held on the 1St day of December, 2015, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner o, gran seconded by Commissioner nay,; G , and adopted by the following vote: Bob Solari, Chairman AYP Joseph E. Flescher, Vice Chairman dye Wesley S. Davis, Commissioner AyP Peter D. O'Bryan, Commissioner Aye Tim Zorc, Commissioner Aye BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: ��`'� �2►-cmc Bob Solari, Chairman 2 of 3 ••.y �Or1M13S�0. ��'R��'ER COUNT••^• ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - 017 ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller BY: Deputy Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY ylan Reingold, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Stan Boling, AICP Community Dev opment Director FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\CIE\2015U3CC Items\Ordinance - CIE 2015.doc 3 of 3 Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan w ■ w Indian River County Community Development Department Supplement # ; Adopted December t , 2015, Ordinance 2015- o 11 Exhibit A TABLE OF CONTENTS Listof Figures................................................................................................................................. ii Listof Tables.................................................................................................................................. iii Introduction..................................................................................................................................... I ExistingConditions......................................................................................................................... 2 FinancialResources...................................................................................................................................2 Expenditures............................................................................................................................................19 ExistingOutstanding Debt......................................................................................................................22 LocalPolicies and Practices....................................................................................................................23 Analysis......................................................................................................................................... 27 Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements..............................................................27 NeedsAssessment...................................................................................................................................33 FiscalAssessment...................................................................................................................................34 FiscalAssessment Summary ...................................................................................................................40 Concurrency Management Plan................................................................................................... 40 ProjectApplicability................................................................................................................................40 ServiceStandards....................................................................................................................................41 Demand..............................................................................................................................................:....42 Availabilityof Capacity...........................................................................................................................44 Regulation...............................................................................................................................................46 MonitoringSystem..................................................................................................................................46 Applicability............................................................................................................................................48 Goal, Objectives and Policies....................................................................................................... 49 Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring............................................................................... 58 Implementation........................................................................................................................................ 58 Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures...................................................................................................60 APPENDIX A: Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements........................................................ A APPENDIX B: 2035 Roadway Improvement Plan......................................................................... B APPENDIX C: School District of Indian River County Capital Improvements Schedule .............. C APPENDIX D: School District of Indian River County Summary of Estimated Revenue ............. D Community Development Department Indian River County Adoptedyecc A4r 112015, Ordinance 2015- 01-1 i List of Figures Fi u�re Title Page Figure 6.1 Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes)............................................................................. 3 Figure6.2 Enterprise Funds........................................................................................................... 3 Figure 6.3 User Fees and Charges................................................................................................. 4 Figure 6.4 Special Assessments...................................................................................................... 4 Figure6.5 Impact Fees................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 6.6 Local Discretionary Sales Surtax................................................................................. 6 Figure 6.7 Tourist Development Tax.............................................................................................. 7 Figure6.8 Local Option Fuel Tax.................................................................................................. 9 Figure 6.9 Franchise Fee/Tax...................................................................................................... 11 Figure 6.10 Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax................................................................... 14 Figure 6.11 County Revenue Sharing........................................................................................... 15 Figure 6.12 Constitutional Fuel Tax............................................................................................ 15 Figure6.13 County Fuel Tax........................................................................................................ 16 Figure 6.14 Alcoholic Beverage License Tax............................................................................... 16 Figure 6.15 Mobile Home License Tax......................................................................................... 17 Figure 6.16 Distribution of General Revenues By Category........................................................ 19 Figure 6.17 General Government Expenditures by Function....................................................... 20 Figure 6.18 Future Capital Improvements Expenditures............................................................. 34 Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -Dae . 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 11 ii List of Tables Table Title Page Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2011/12 .................................................... 2 Table 6.2: Optional Tourist Taxes on Transient Rental Facilities ................................................. 8 Table 6.3: Local Fuel Tax Rates.................................................................................................. 10 Table 6.4: Indian River County General Revenues By Source ..................................................... 18 Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Function ....................... 19 Table 6.6: Indian River County Existing Long Term Debt........................................................... 23 Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue Projection Summary.......................................................... 29 Table 6.8: Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan Element ............................... 31 Table 6.9: Indian River County Tax Base and Millage Projections ............................................. 31 Table 6.10: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures for Indian River County &.................... 33 Table 6.11: Indian River County Overall General Expenditures Projection Summary ............... 35 Table 6.12: Projected Expenses for Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste ............................................ 36 Table 6.13: Indian River County Overall Operating Cost Projections ........................................ 36 Table 6.14: Indian River County Estimated Ability to Raise Bonds Without A Public Vote........ 37 Table 6.15 Indian River County Bond Schedule........................................................................... 38 Table 6.16: Service Level Measures for Concurrency Related Facilities .................................... 41 Table 6.17: Monitoring System Design........................................................................................ 47 Table 6.18: Monitoring System Tasks........................................................................................... 48 Table 6.19: Capital Improvement Element Implementation Matrix ............................................. 59 Table 6.20: Capital Improvements Element Evaluation Matrix ................................................... 61 Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -0 ea • 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- e i 7 iii Introduction The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) summarizes the needed capital facilities identified in the county's comprehensive plan and describes the financial means by which identified needed facilities are to be funded. The CIE also demonstrates the economic feasibility of the entire comprehensive plan and prioritizes the funding of all the public facilities identified in the county's comprehensive plan based on the level of need and the availability of funds. For purposes of this element, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building, or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and which is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards or to meet objectives identified in the county's comprehensive plan. Included in the CIE are an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a concurrency management section, a goals, objectives, and policies section, and an implementation section. While financial resources and existing local policies and practices are discussed in the existing conditions section, the fiscal condition of both the county and its comprehensive plan, as well as other issues concerning capital improvement projects, are assessed in the analysis section of this element. In the concurrency management section, the administrative framework for maintaining public facility service levels is addressed while the county's overall capital improvements strategy is discussed in the goals, objectives and policies section. Finally, a 5 -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, as well as monitoring and evaluation programs, can be found in the implementation section of this element. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted p o - c. 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- o, 1 1 Existing Conditions Financial Resources One of the chief functions of the Capital Improvements Element is to inventory the major sources of revenue available to the county. Those revenue sources determine the county's capability to fund needed capital improvements. Table 6.1 lists the county's local, state, and federal revenue sources and indicates the amount of revenue collected from each source during FY 2013/14. Table 6.1 also shows the percentage distribution of total revenue received by Indian River County for each of the revenue sources. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'D c c - 1 1 2015, Ordinance 2015- o i 1 2 Table 6.1: Indian River County Revenue Sources (FY 2013/14) Federal Sources State Sources Local,Sources Amount % of Total Amount % of Total Amount % of Total ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue ($1,000) Revenue Various Grants $8,944 4.29% Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax $8,220 3.95% Ad Valorem Taxes $72,716 34.90% Total Federal $8,944 4.29% County Revenue Sharing $3,082 1.48% Enterprise Funds $45,337 21.76% Constitutional Fuel $1,628 0.78% User Fees and $18,077 8.68% Tax Charges $706 0.34% $505 0.24% County Fuel Tax Special Assessments $61 0.03% $4,218 2.02% Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Impact Fees Distribution of $447 0.21% $15,228 7.31% Sales and Use Local Discretionary Taxes to Counties Sales Surtax Mobile Home $108 ° 0.05% Tourist Development $1,918 0.92% License Tax Tax Various Grants $6,369 3.06% Local Option Fuel $3,133 1.50% Tax 9.90% $9,311 4.47% Total State $20,621 Franchise Tax $920 0.44% Interest Income 3.56% Other $7,413 85.81% Total Local $178,776 100.00% Total All Sources $208,341 Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'D c c - 1 1 2015, Ordinance 2015- o i 1 2 Local Sources Local sources consist of revenues that are levied, collected and disbursed at the local level solely at the discretion of Indian River County. Those local sources are shown in table 6. 1, and are described in further detail below. • Ad Valorem Taxes (Property Taxes) Ad Valorem taxes are taxes levied on the assessed value (net of any exemptions) of real and personal property. This tax is commonly referred to as "property tax." Ad valorem taxes are generally assessed in mills; that is, thousandths of a dollar of assessed value. The state mandated millage cap is 10 mills per local government, excluding voted millages. In FY Figure 6.1: Ad Valorem Tax Revenue by FY $100,000 Ssa,397 $90,000, $80,000- 80,000 $70,000- $70,000$60,000$50,000$40,000$30,000$20,000$10,000 $60,000- $50,000- $40,000- $30,000- $20,000- $10,000 $0 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) 2013/14, Indian River County imposed a Source: Indian River County Finance Department aggregate millage rate of 5.4611. According to County policy, ad valorem taxes may be used for both operating and capital project expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that, in FY 2013/14, Indian River County collected approximately $72,716,000 in ad valorem taxes. In FY 2013/14, ad valorem tax Indian River County. Figure 6.1 displays the ad valorem tax revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. As shown, ad valorem tax revenue peaked in 2009, and declined through 2013. With recent market data and trends showing an increase in the sales price of homes, Ad Valorem Tax Revenue increased in FY 2013/14. • Enterprise Funds Within governmental entities, there are often various departments that provide goods and services to the public in a manner similar to the private sector. Such departments, classed under the general title "enterprise funds," must raise es represented 34.90% of all revenues collected b Figure 6.2: Enterprise Fund Reserve by FY $46,000 $45,337 $45,000 $44,000 $43,649 $42,905 $43,000 $42,378 $42,000 $41,531 $41,542 $41,000 $40,000 $39,000 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'D e e-. 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- y i l 3 revenues from outside the government sector. Generally, enterprise departments assess a fee to the customer using the goods or services provided by that department. In Indian River County, the Utility System, Solid Waste Disposal District, Golf Course, and Building Division are enterprise funds. Table 6.1 shows that enterprise fund revenue represented 21.76% of Indian River County's total funds for FY 2013/14. Figure 6.2 displays the enterprise fund revenue collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, enterprise fund revenue increased 9.16%. • User Fees and Charges User fees and charges represent revenue received by the county for providing various general services. Those fees and charges are necessary because taxes alone cannot totally keeu with the increasing costs of Figure 6.3: User Fees and Charges by FY $20,000 $18,077 $18,000 $16.653 $15,887 $16,000 $14,666 $15,030 $14,760 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000$2,000 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) services This category includes fees Source: Indian River County Finance Department collected by the Tax Collector's Office, the Clerk of the Circuit Court, the Property Appraiser's Office, the Sheriff's Department, and the Recreation and Parks Department. This category also includes other miscellaneous user fees charged by the county for general services not financed by other fund sources. In FY 2013/14, user fees and charges represented 8.68% of all funds collected by Indian River County. Figure 6.3 displays user fees and charges collected by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. During that time period, revenue from user fees and charges varied, but overall increased 7.26%. • _ Special Assessments Special assessments are compulsory payments levied on real property for specific benefits generated by public investments or services. By law, the assessment levied must fairly reflect the actual costs of the improvements. Figure 6.4: Special Assessments Revenue by FY $600 $520 $487 $481 $505 $500 $420 $397 $400 $300 $200 $100 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -Oe c . 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 1 4 County revenues which fall under the general category of special assessments consist of street paving assessments, street lighting district assessments, as well as assessments for water, sewer, and drainage improvements. Expenditures of special assessment revenue are restricted to public improvement projects that directly benefit the property owner or payee. For example, street paving assessment revenues must be spent on paving streets that directly benefit the payer of the assessment. Special Assessment revenue represented 0.24% of county funds for FY 2013/14 as shown in table 6.1. Figure 6.4 displays the revenue collected by Indian River County through special assessments over the last six fiscal years. Impact Fees An impact fee is a one-time charge, fee, or assessment levied as a condition of subdivision or site plan approval, building permit issuance, or other development or construction approval when the revenues collected are intended to fund the costs of capital improvements for public facilities. Since 1986, Indian River County has levied traffic impact fees on new development projects. In June of 2005, Indian River County began to levy 8 new impact fees. At the same time, the County increased the existing traffic impact fee rates. The nine impact fees include: traffic, emergency services, parks and recreation, public schools, solid waste, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. Figure 6.5: Impact Fee Revenue by FY $4,500 ------- $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,Ooo $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- , 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■Revenue (n thousands) J Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted _D e c - 19 2015, Ordinance 2015- o l Source: Indian River County Finance Department On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees were: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. At its March 16, 2010 vote, the Board of County Commissioners extended the suspension of the five impact fees to March 31, 2011. On March 15, 2011 and again on March 13, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners re-evaluated the impact fee suspension and ultimately voted to continue suspending three of the five previously suspended impact fees. Those three fees were: public buildings, 'I 5 Source: Indian River County Finance Department On March 3, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners considered several alternatives to reduce impact fees for the purpose of stimulating economic development in the county. After discussion, the Board decided to suspend collection of five of the county's nine impact fees for six months. The five suspended impact fees were: emergency services, correctional facilities, public buildings, law enforcement, and solid waste. On September 22, 2009 and again on March 16, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners voted to further extend the suspension of the five impact fees. At its March 16, 2010 vote, the Board of County Commissioners extended the suspension of the five impact fees to March 31, 2011. On March 15, 2011 and again on March 13, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners re-evaluated the impact fee suspension and ultimately voted to continue suspending three of the five previously suspended impact fees. Those three fees were: public buildings, 'I 5 correctional facilities, and solid waste facilities. The March 13, 2012 vote of the Board of County Commissioners suspended the three fees until March 31, 2014. On March 11, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners voted to suspend the same three impact fees until March 31, 2015 or until the County could complete its most recent impact fee review and adopt a new impact fee schedule. By early April 2014 the County had completed the nonresidential portion of its impact fee review and on April 22, 2014 the Board of County Commissioners adopted a revised reduced nonresidential impact fee schedule with an effective date of May 5, 2014. The residential impact fee review was completed in September of 2014 and a revised residential impact fee schedule was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on October 14, 2014 with an effective date of February 2, 2015. For both the nonresidential impact fee schedule and the residential impact fee schedule the Board of County Commissioners voted to not collect the correctional facilities, solid waste facilities, and libraries impact fees at this time. Figure 6.5 shows that over four million dollars of impact fee revenue was collected in FY 2013/14. This is over two million dollars more than what was collected in FY 2008/09. Impact fee revenues decreased during the Great Recession and have slowly increased since FY 2009/10. • Local Discretionary Sales Surtax Pursuant to s. 212.055, F.S, local governments are authorized to levy numerous types of local discretionary sales surtaxes. Under the provisions of s. 212.054, F.S., the local discretionary sales surtaxes apply to all transactions subject to the state tax imposed on sales, services, rentals, admissions, and other authorized transactions. The surtax is computed by multiplying the rate imposed by the county where the sale occurs by the amount of the taxable sale. This sales tax can be levied on most transactions under $5,000. According to state law, Indian River County is eligible to impose a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax of either 0.5% or 1.0%. Currently, Indian River County imposes the 1.0% Infrastructure Surtax. Figure 6.6: Local Discretionary Sales Surtax by FY $16,000 MUM $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $- - 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■Revenue (in thousands) Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted '7ec . I , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 11 ■ 1 Source: Indian River County Finance Department Procedurally, the Local Government Infrastructure Surtax must be enacted by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners and approved by voters in a countywide referendum. That surtax, which may be imposed for a maximum period of fifteen years, was imposed by Indian River County in April, 1989, and was renewed by voters in November, 2002. Generally, the proceeds must be expended to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure; to acquire land for public recreation or 6 conservation or protection of natural resources; or to finance the closure of local government-owned solid waste landfills that are already closed or are required to close by order of the Department of Environmental Protection. The tax will expire on December 31, 2019, unless renewed by the voters. If that tax is not renewed by the voters, beginning in FY 2019/20, either capital project expenditures will need to be significantly decreased or another significant revenue source or combination of revenue sources will be required. Because it is not currently known if the tax will be renewed, this CIE reflects a reduction of expenditures for FY 2019/20. Notes have been added to the 5 year schedule of capital improvements to indicate projects that will have deficient funding if the local discretionary sales surtax is not renewed. With respect to transportation projects, the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan indicates that many if not most of the County's major roadways, including County Road 510, 43rd and 58th Avenues between 16th Street and 26th Street, 26th Street (east of 58th Avenue), and CR 512 (west of I-95) will be severely over capacity if funding sources are not maintained and if projects are deferred because of the lack of funding. Table 6.1 shows that local sales surtax revenue represented 7.3 1 % of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Figure 6.6 displays the Local Discretionary Sales Surtax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. This local revenue source increased by 16.93% over that period. Distribution of surtax proceeds is based on the specifics of an interlocal agreement or through a formula based on population. In Indian River County, Local Infrastructure Surtax revenue is distributed to county government and municipal governments through a formula based on population. Currently, eighteen of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy a Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. Within Indian River County's region, Brevard, Martin, Palm Beach, and St. Lucie counties do not levy the surtax. While Okeechobee County is Figure 6.7: Tourist Development Tax Revenue by FY $2,500 $2,000 $1,743 $1,918 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $- 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■Revenue (n thousands) Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 1,2 - 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 017 7 81,605 $1,487 $1.294 $1,325 Source: Indian River County Finance Department eligible to levy the infrastructure surtax, it instead levies a Small County Surtax of 1%. That is another local discretionary sales surtax. • Tourist Development Tax Any county in the state may, subject to a vote of the citizenry, impose a Tourist Development Tax. The transient rental trade is the primary base for the levy of the tourist tax. Any lodging agreement for six months or less is subject to the tax. Generally, the tourist tax levy is one or two percent. Counties, however, may set an additional one percent above the original tax through an extraordinary vote of the governing board or by referendum. Further, if a professional sports franchise facility is located within a county, an additional one to two percent tourist tax may also be levied. The first one percent professional sports franchise facility tax may be authorized by a majority vote of the governing board of the county, while the second one percent tax must be authorized by a majority plus one vote of the governing board of the county. Currently, Indian River County imposes the original two percent tourist tax, the additional one percent tax, and an additional one percent professional sports franchise facility tax. Out of Florida's sixty-seven counties, sixty-two currently levy a tourist tax. Of those sixty-two counties, forty-seven counties, including Indian River County, impose an additional one percent tourist tax; thirty-eight counties, including Indian River County, impose a one percent professional sports franchise tax, and twenty-three counties impose the second one percent professional sports franchise tax. Table 6.2 displays the tourist taxes imposed in counties that are geographically proximate to Indian River County. Compared to neighboring counties, Indian River County imposes a similar level of tourist taxes. Palm Beach County has the highest tourist tax levy of the six counties listed (6.0%), followed by Brevard, St. Lucie, and Martin Counties at 5.0%. While Indian River County has a tourist tax rate of 4.00%, Okeechobee County has the lowest tourist tax levy at 3.0%. Source: The Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research website: uctober Zu t :). The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted V ec . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 8 Table 6.2 Optional Tourist Taxes on ,Trausl at Rent�i a�cili iesON ON` Professional #idd><rib>aal ��� Additional SI10rtS P1`4fesS1UA ,4,` , Ct)11Ti Tourist Tax Tax'Franchise - � Spurts t`QTeiltt8��", Facility Tax `hranchise Taal ; Brevard 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Indian River 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% ---------- 5.00% 4.00% Martin 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Okeechobee 2.00% 1.00% ---------- 5.00% 3.00% Palm Beach 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 6.00%* 6.00%* St. Lucie 2.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 5.00% 5.00% Note: Shading indicates those counties eligible to impose a particular tax *Palm Beach County is 1 out of 7 counties in the state that can also impose a 1% High Tourism Impact Tax, which it currently does levee. Source: The Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research website: uctober Zu t :). The Local Option Tourist Tax can be used for the following purposes: Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted V ec . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 8 (1) Acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, and promote one or more publicly owned and operated convention centers, such as sports stadiums, coliseums, or auditoriums within the district that the tax is imposed; (2) Acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, and promote aquariums, or museums that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by a not-for-profit organization and open to the public , within the boundaries of the county or subcounty special taxing district in which the tax is levied; (3) Promote zoological parks that are publicly owned and operated or owned and operated by not-for-profit organizations and open to the public; (4) Promote and advertise tourism nationally, internationally, and in the State of Florida; (5) Fund convention bureaus and other tourist information bureaus as county agencies or by contract with the Chamber of Commerce or similar associations in the county; (6) Finance beach development and restoration as well as shoreline protection and restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access; (7) Pledge the revenues to secure and liquidate revenue bonds issued by the county, subject to certain limitations. Figure 6.7 shows the Tourist Development Tax revenue received by Indian River County over the last six fiscal years. Since FY 2008/09, Tourist Development Tax revenue has gradually increased from $1,294,000 in FY 2008/09 to $1,918,000 in FY 2013/14. This is an overall increase of 48.22% during that time frame. • Local Option Fuel Tax Local governments are authorized to levy up to twelve cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. Those levies are: ➢ a one to six cent local option fuel tax; ➢ a one to five cent local option Figure 6.8: Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue by FY $3,400 $3,350 $3,336 $3,300 $3,250 $3,200 $3,200 $3,181 $3,173 $3,150 '1 $3133 $3,100 $3,050 $3,000 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -a ec • 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 9 fuel tax; and ➢ a ninth cent fuel tax. Indian River County currently imposes the full six cents of the one to six cent fuel tax. That tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within the county. The one to six cent fuel tax may be authorized by an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the governing body or voter approval in a county -wide referendum. Generally, the proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. Table 6.1 shows that local option fuel tax revenue represented 1.50% of all funds collected by Indian River County for FY 2013/14. Figure 6.8 shows that, with the exception of FY 2009/1 O,there has been a downward trend with local option fuel tax revenue for the county, decreasing to its lowest point in FY 2013/14. One reason for the limited gas tax revenues in FY 2008/09 is that fuel prices were quite high and fuel consumption by consumers slowed (less traveling). The rebound in local option fuel tax revenue in FY 2009/10 can be attributed to a number of factors, including an increase in the local option fuel tax distribution rate from the state from 71.12% in 2007/08 to 72.58% in 2009/10. The subsequent reduction in local option fuel tax revenue can be attributed to increased gas prices as well as more fuel efficient vehicles. All sixty-seven Florida counties levy a portion of the original local option fuel tax. While sixty-six counties levy the full $0.06, one county levies only a portion of the tax. Table 6.3 identifies the local fuel taxes levied in Indian River County and in other counties in the region. As shown in Table 6.3, Saint Lucie, Martin, Okeechobee, and Palm Beach counties all levy the highest allowable fuel taxes at $0.12 per gallon. Those four counties impose both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. While Indian River County is eligible to levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax either by extraordinary vote of the Board of County Commissioners or by voter approval in a countywide referendum, it does not currently levy either tax. At this time, fifty-two of the sixty-seven Florida counties levy the Ninth -Cent Fuel Tax, while twenty-nine of the sixty-seven Florida counties impose at least a portion of the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax. Table 6:3; = Lgal.Fuelaxtates County County One�tu Six Cent hocal "CXption Fuel fax'"° One , -Five Cent local Qptian'Fuel Taxi _ North Gent FuelTpt� °, �;'= Tax = �� Brevard $0.06 -------- -------- $0.06 Indian River $0.06 -------- -------- $0.06 Martin $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Okeechobee $0.06 $0.05 $0.01 $0.12 Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted TJ e c • I , 2015, Ordinance 2015- o i 1 10 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Source: The Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research website: Uctober 2U13. • Franchise Fee/Tax Counties and municipalities may exercise their home rule authority to impose a fee upon a utility for the grant of a franchise and the privilege of the utility using the local government's rights-of-way to conduct the utility's business. Franchise fees are typically levied through a franchise agreement negotiated between the local government and the utility provider. Indian River County receives franchise revenue from electric, water, sewer, garbage, and cable television franchises. Table 6.1 shows that franchise fee revenue represented 4.47% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Figure 6.9 shows that over the last six fiscal years franchise fee revenue collected by Indian River County decreased 3.71 %. • Other Miscellaneous Revenue Figure 6.9: Franchise Fee/Tax Revenue by FY $9,800 $9,670 $9,600 $9,400$9,311 $9.255 $9,200 $9,000 $8,819 $8,800 $8,731 48,620 $8,600 $8,400 $8,200 $8,000 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■Revenue (n thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Included in this category are various administrative fees, licenses and permits, fines, interest income, rental income, private contributions, and other miscellaneous revenues. This source of revenue for Indian River County represented 3.56% of all funds collected in FY 2013/14. • Borrowing As needed, the county uses borrowing as a financing vehicle to raise money for public purposes that are beyond the realm of current cash reserves, operating revenue and reasonable taxation. Currently, borrowing money to pay for capital improvements can be done through either short-term or long-term Community Development Department Indian River County Adoptedt7ec . I , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 011 11 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element financing. Short term financing is usually accomplished by the use of bond pools, notes, private placements with banks, and the public placement of Voted General Obligation debt. Long term financing is usually achieved through the issuance of bonds sold on the public market. According to state law, local governments may sell bonds for capital improvements without a referendum of the voters if the pledge used for the bond is a non -ad valorem revenue source. Conversely, any bond issue pledging ad valorem taxes requires approval through a voter referendum. General Obligation Bonds are bonds that are secured by the full faith and credit of the issuing government. Those bonds are secured by a pledge of the issuer's ad valorem taxing power. According to state law, the amount of ad valorem taxes necessary to pay the debt service on general obligation bonds is not subj ect to the constitutional property tax millage limits. Such bonds constitute debts of the issuer and require approval through a voter referendum prior to issuance. Revenue bonds are bonds payable from a specific source of revenue, where the full faith and credit of the issuer is not pledged to repay the bonds. Because revenue bonds are payable from identified sources of revenue, bond holders may not compel taxation or legislative appropriation of funds for payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of financed projects, grants, or other specified non -ad valorem taxes. A public referendum is not required prior to issuance or validation of such obligations. In the past, the county has issued revenue bonds to finance improvements to its sanitary sewer, potable water, and golf course facilities. Also, revenue bonds have been issued to finance the cost of construction of various capital improvement projects. Deposits from bond revenues are put into the respective bond fund accounts for those projects, whereby funds are specifically designated for a particular project, and user charges are used to pay off the debt. Special assessment bonds are bonds issued to pay for capital improvements that impact specific areas or groups of property owners. Proceeds from the assessments levied against benefiting property owners are used to pay off the bond debt. The issuance of those bonds does not need to be approved by voter referendum. Revenue bonds and special assessment bonds are similar in nature, except that special assessment bond debt is paid -off by assessments levied against benefiting property owners and not from ongoing user charges. The county has issued special assessment bonds for solid waste disposal. The issuance of tax anticipation or bond anticipation notes is an example of a short-term (less than five years) method of financing. Notes usually have higher interest rates than bonds and have shorter maturity dates than bonds. Tax anticipation notes are issued in advance of a new fiscal year to cover gaps in the budget before property taxes are received, while bond anticipation notes are issued in Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted . i _9 2015, Ordinance 2015- D 11 12 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element anticipation of the receipt by the county of proceeds from the sale of corresponding future bond issues. The county currently has no outstanding tax or bond anticipation notes. • Additional Optional Local Revenue Sources Occasionally, the use of additional revenue sources may be necessary, depending on priorities mandated by the Board of County Commissioners and the availability of existing revenue sources. In such cases, Indian River County has two options to increase local revenues. One is to implement new taxes that are permitted by state regulation, while the other is to increase existing taxes and fees that are imposed by the county. Additional local revenue sources available to Indian River County include the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax, and the Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax. Both the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax and the One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax are taxes on the purchase of fuel. With the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax, a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel and special fuel can be levied on fuel purchases in the county. Revenue from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax may be shared with municipalities, but counties are not required by law to share the proceeds. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the Ninth Cent Fuel Tax include paying the costs and expenses of establishing, operating, and maintaining a transportation system and related facilities. Additional uses include funding the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads. The One to Five Cent Local Option Fuel Tax is a one to five cents tax that can be levied upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in Indian River County. Revenues from that fuel tax must be shared among all eligible jurisdictions in the county as a result of an interlocal agreement or by an historical transportation expenditures formula. Authorized uses for revenue collected from the One to Five Cent Fuel Tax include transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan. A Professional Sports Franchise Facility Tax is a levy of up to 1% on any lodging agreement for six months or less. Revenue from this tax may be used to pay the debt service on bonds issued to finance the construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a professional sports franchise facility. State Sources Revenue classified as state sources may be generated locally but collected by the state and returned to the county. Table 6.1 displays the state revenue sources applicable to Indian River County. Those sources are described in further detail below. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -D r- c . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 11 13 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Local Government Half -Cent Sales Tax The Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Program allocates 8.9744% of net sales tax proceeds remitted by sales tax dealers in a county to a special account administered by the Department of Revenue; that account is the Local Government Half Cent Sales Tax Clearing Trust Fund. Those funds are then earmarked for distribution to the governing body of the county and each municipality within the county. Distribution of those monies within the county is determined by a formula that uses a weighting factor based on the population of the incorporated and unincorporated areas and multiplies that factor by 8.9744% of the sales tax proceeds received by the county. In FY 2013/14, Indian River County received $8,220,000 through the half -cent sales tax. As shown in Figure 6.10: Half Cent Sales Tax Revenue $8,500 by FY $8.220 $8,000 $7,829 $7,500 $7,413 57,000$7,075 $7,000 6 929 $6,500 $6,000 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6. 1, that amount represented 3.95% of all funds collected by Indian River County during the 2013/14 fiscal year. Figure 6.10 displays the funds made available to Indian River County through the half -cent local government sales tax over the last six fiscal years. Overall, Indian River County's half -cent sales tax revenue increased between Fiscal Year 2008/09 and Fiscal Year 2013/14. Occasionally, governments can receive supplemental distributions by meeting special eligibility criteria; however, in no case can the total supplemental and ordinary distribution exceed the maximum per capita amount allowed by law. Governments are allowed wide latitude in using the half cent sales tax. For counties, the law provides only that half cent sales tax revenue be used for countywide tax relief or countywide programs. • County Revenue Sharing The current structure of the county revenue sharing program consists of two revenue sources. Those sources include 2.90% of net cigarette tax collections and 2.0603% of sales and use tax collections. Proceeds are collected by the state and then distributed to eligible counties based on an allocation formula. There are no use restrictions on the distributed revenue; however, there are some statutory limitations regarding those funds being used as a pledge for indebtedness. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'Vee- . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- Oil 14 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element To receive distribution proceeds through the county revenue sharing program, counties must meet the following criteria. (1) Law enforcement officers and firefighters are certified and meet state requirements; (2) Certification of taxable value for a property tax levy is made in a timely and correct manner to the Department of Revenue; (3) The county's most recent financial reports must have been sent to the Department of Financial Services, and post audits of those statements and accounts must have been provided. Figure 6.11: County Revenue Sharing by FY $3,500 - $3,082 $3,000$2, $2 751 $2,894 $2, 558 $2, 576 660 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) Table 6.1 shows that county revenue sharing Source: Indian River County Finance Department funds represented 1.48% of all funds collected by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Figure 6.11 shows that, between Fiscal Year 2008/09 and 2011/14, Indian River County's revenue sharing gradually increased and did not return to similar levels until Fiscal Year 2012/13. • Constitutional Fuel Tax The constitutional fuel tax is defined as an excise or license tax of two cents per gallon of motor fuel, imposed upon the first sale or first removal from storage (after importation into Florida). Revenues from this levy become state funds at the time of collection by the refiner, importer or wholesaler. In its current form, the constitutional fuel tax is a state -shared revenue source for counties only. Applying a distribution formula, the state allocates proceeds to counties to the extent necessary to comply with all obligations to or for the benefit of holders of bonds, revenue certificates, and tax anticipation certificates or any refunds secured FIGURE 6.12: Constitutional Fuel Tax Revenue by FY $1,640 $1,62 $1,630 $1,620 $1,610 $1,600 $1,593 $1,597 $1,590 $1,580 $1,580 $1,57 $1,57 $1,570 $1,560 $1,550 $1,540 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted tie.. 1 1 2015, Ordinance 2015- Oil 15 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element by any portion of the tax proceeds. After complying with the necessary debt service obligations, the state distributes a county's surplus funds to its governing body. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the constitutional fuel tax levy represented 0.78% of total revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Figure 6.12 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, constitutional fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased by 3.37%. • County Fuel Tax The county fuel tax is levied on motor fuel at the rate of one cent per net gallon. The legislative intent of this tax is to reduce a county's reliance on ad valorem taxes. Funds received from this tax can be used by a county for transportation -related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.34% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased 2.32%. • Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida. The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local governments by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax by FY $80 $70 $671 $61 $60 $Ss $57 $501$53 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Qa c • 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 017 16 Figure 6.13: County Fuel Tax by FY $710 $705 $700 $695 $690 IN NONE I $685 IRENE. $680 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the county fuel tax levy represented 0.34% of all revenue collected by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Figure 6.13 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, county fuel tax revenue received by Indian River County increased 2.32%. • Alcoholic Beverage License Tax Alcoholic beverage license taxes are levied on manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and sales agencies of alcoholic beverages in Florida. The tax is administered, collected, enforced, and distributed to local governments by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco within the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. Figure 6.14: Alcoholic Beverage License Tax by FY $80 $70 $671 $61 $60 $Ss $57 $501$53 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■ Revenue (in thousands) Source: Indian River County Finance Department Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Qa c • 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 017 16 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Twenty-four percent of the license taxes imposed on the sale of beer, wine and liquor collected within a county is returned to the county Tax Collector. The remaining funds are used to operate the division and contribute to the operation of the Office of the Secretary of Business Regulation. Table 6.1 shows that the county received approximately $61,000 from this tax in FY 2013/14, 0.03% of all revenue received by Indian River County. Figure 6.14 shows that, over the last six fiscal years, alcoholic beverage license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated slightly. • Distribution of Sales and Use Taxes to Counties According to Florida Statutes, a guaranteed entitlement of $29,915,500 is equally distributed among Florida's sixty-seven counties, providing each county's general revenue fund with $446,500. Table 6.1 shows that revenue received from the Distribution of Sales and Use Taxes represented 0.21% of revenues received by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Uses for this revenue are determined by the Board of County Commissioners. • Mobile Home License Tax An annual license tax is levied on all mobile homes and park trailers, and on all travel trailers and fifth -wheel trailers exceeding thirty-five feet in body length. The license taxes, ranging from $20 to $80 depending on body length, are collected in lieu of ad valorem taxes. The taxes are collected by county tax collectors and remitted to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. From each license, two deductions are made. The first is a deduction of $1.50 by the De artment of Hi hwa Safety and Motor Figure 6.15: Mobile Home License Tax Revenue by FY $113 $112 $112 $111 $111 $110 $110 $109 $108 $108 $108 $107 $107 $106 $105 $104 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 ■Revenue (in thousands) F g Y Source: Indian River County Finance Department Vehicles, with proceeds deposited into the State General Revenue Fund. The second is a deduction of $1.00, with proceeds deposited into the Florida Mobile Home Relocation Trust Fund. The remaining balance is deposited into the License Tax Collection Trust Fund for distribution to units of local government. A county government is eligible to receive proceeds from this tax if taxable mobile home units are located in its unincorporated area. An authorized use of the proceeds is not specified in the current law. Table 6.1 shows that funds received through the mobile home license tax represented 0.05% of all revenue received by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Figure 6.15 shows that, mobile home license tax revenue received by Indian River County fluctuated between FY 2008/09 and FY 2013/14. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Ve o . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 01 7 17 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Various Grants Table 6.1 shows that funds received in the form of state grants represented 3.06% of funds received by the county in FY 2013/14. Those state grant funds received by the county originated from the Division of Emergency Management, the Department of Economic Opportunity, the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, the Florida Department of State, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the , the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the Florida Department of Revenue, and the Florida Department of Health. Federal Sources Federal funds are either granted directly to local governments or passed through state agencies for administration and monitoring. Those grants are usually distributed on a competitive basis rather than by formula allocations, thereby making forecasts of future revenues difficult. For the purpose of revenue forecasts, those sources will be assumed to remain constant. During FY 2013/14, the county received approximately $8,944,000 in federal funds. Those funds represented 4.29% of all funds received by Indian River County in FY 2013/14. Overall Revenue Sources As mandated by state statute, the financial resources of the county are categorized according to the state Chart of Accounts. The categories in the state Chart of Accounts are taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenue, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, and miscellaneous revenues. Table 6.4 identifies the total amount of historic revenue generated from those sources for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2013/14. Fiscal Year Tabu 6.4: Indian River County Gen_ eral Revenues By Sou>re ,v F .,"�a Licenses & _ " �tergoyernnnemal Charges f .. kYuet' C' " M t� ' Taxes Permits Revenue `Service,#�orFeituns, _Re 2008/09 $113,689,399 $12,433,598 $39,249,261 $58,384,013 $1,792,517 $8,946,401 $234,495,189 2009/2010 $103,626,726 $11,322,039 $33,503,504 $56,207,941 $852,012 $10049,583 $215,561,805 2010/2011 $94,718,550 $11,189,393 $30,539,947 $57,408,464 $936,995 $6,243,099 $201,036,448 2011/2012 $9Q472,569 $11,486,235 $29,832,306 $57,664,910 $739,275 $6,549,861 $196,745,156 2012/2013 $88,005,422 $12,769,844 $30,800,036 $59,536,566 $778,575 $4,934,481 $196,824,924 2013/2014 $94,585,345 $14,321,389 $30,873,889 $63,414,219 $1,004,374 $4,141,341 $208,340,557 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 201 s & malan River County r uiauce Lepa� Figure 6.16 displays the distribution of revenue by the same categories listed in table 6.4 for each of the last six fiscal years. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 1D e e . 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 1 :7_ 18 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Figure 6.16: Distribution of General Revenues By Category 2009 48.48% 5.30% 16.74% 3.82%j CP. 0.7 2012 45.98% 5.84% 15.16% 3.33% 029.31% 0.38% ■ Taxes Charges for Services Expenditures 2010 48.07% 5.25% 15.54% 4.66% 26.08% 0.40% 2013 44.71 % 6.49% 15.65% i 2.51% 30.25% 0.40% ® Licenses & Permits ■ Fines & Forfeitures 2011 47.12% 5.57% 15.19% 3.11%W8 .11 %28.56% 0.47% 2014 45.40% 6.87% 14.82% I 1.99% 30.44% 0.48% ❑ Intergovernmental Revenue e Miscellaneous Revenues In the previous sub -section, the various revenue and income sources currently utilized by Indian River County were reviewed. This sub -section of the Capital Improvements Element identifies how those monies are allocated to meet the County's needs. Table 6.5 presents the County's overall general expenditures by category for fiscal years 2008/09 through 2013/14. Table 6.5: Indian River County General Government Expenditures By Funct>lon aniil by FY '"x ;, '; Fiscal Year 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 1013/14 ; General Government $25,801,688 $24,389,096 $21,159,341 $22,039,065 $21,965,255 $21,517147 Public Safety $74,813,164 $71,489,679 $71,201,677 $69,190,096 $66,908,328 $70368651 Physical Environment $54,243,069 $46,652,461 $45,781,309 $47,143,211 $46,668,122 $49,893,042 Transportation $40,841,272 $31,290,476 $32,081,560 $32,734,532 $37,687,588 $34,859,058 Economic Environment $653,547 $2,520,339 $2,099,698 $2,021,184 $2,581,401 $1,106,886 Human Services $8,621,760 $7,267,406 $7,625,369 $6,888,883 $6,952,460 $7,178,542 Culture/Recreation $19,624,278 $22,474,737 $18,165,989 $18304,674 $14,613,121 $15,178,817 Court Related $6,620,830 $6,214,831 $5,983,085 $5,860,925 $6,054,822 $6,487,906 Debt Service $8,068,758 $8,073,138 $6,832,374 $10,486083 $8,168,704 $5684,616 TOTAL $239,288,366 $220,372,163 $210,930,402 $215,068,653 $211,599,801 $212,274,665 Source: Indian River County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2014 Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted u « - 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- o!-1 19 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 6.5 shows expenditures in nine categories. Depending on the county's activities in any given fiscal year, the level of expenditures may fluctuate for certain categories. Figure 6.17 displays the percentage distribution of Indian River County's general expenditures over the last six fiscal years. General Government A major classification of services provided by Indian River County, the general government expenditure category, consists of activities undertaken by the legislative and administrative branches of the county government. Departments such as the Board of County Commissioners, County Administrator, Personnel, and Purchasing fall into this category, as do all Constitutional Officers, except the Sheriff. As shown in table 6.5, $21,517,147 was spent on general government services in FY 2013/14. Between fiscal years 2008/09 and 2013/14, general government expenditures decreased by 16.61%. In FY2013/14, general government services represented 10.14% of all county expenses. Public Safety The Sheriff's Department, Fire Services, Advanced Life Support, Emergency Management, and the Medical Examiner fall under the category of Public Safety. As shown in table 6.5, the county, in FY 2013/14, spent $70,368,651 for public safety services. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2013/14, Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function 200922 .7% 17.1% 4 31.3% 0.3% 3.6% 10.8% 3.4% 2.890 8.2% 2011 33.8% 10.0% ii 21.7% 3.2% 2.8% 1.0% 8.6% 3.6% 15.2% o General Government m Transportation e Culture/Recreation 2010 32.4% 21.2% 11.1°0 3.7% 14.2% 2.8% 10.2% �Vo 2013 31.6% 10.4% w 22.1% 3.9% 17.8% 2.9% 6.9% 3.286 1.2% ■ Public Safety ■ Economic Environment m Court Related Community Development Department Adoptedye c • i , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 11 2012 32.2% 10.2% M. 21.9% 4.996 15.2% 2.796 8.796 3.203% 0.9% 10.1% 2.7% 2014 33.1% 23.5% i.4% ❑ Physical Environment m Human Services is Debt Service Indian River County Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element public safety expenditures increased by 5.17%. Since FY 2008/09, public safety expenditures have decreased by 5.94%. Public safety represented 33.15% of all county expenses in FY 2013/14. Physical Environment The physical environment classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $49,893,042 was spent on these activities in FY 2013/14. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2013/14, physical environment expenditures increased by 6.91%. Since FY 2008/09, physical environment expenditures have decreased by 8.02%. Physical environment services represented 23.50% of all county expenses in FY 2013/14. Transportation Departments under the transportation category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. Those departments are responsible for designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As shown in table 6.5, the county spent $34,859,058 on transportation facilities in FY 2013/14. Since FY 2008/09, transportation expenditures have decreased by 14.65%. Transportation expenses represented 16.42% of all county expenses in FY 2013/14. Economic Environment Included in the economic environment category are the costs of providing services which develop and improve the economic condition of the community and its citizens. Up to June 30, 2011, Veteran Services, the Housing Authority, and the Economic Development Division of the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce primarily undertook that function. On July 1, 2011, the Housing Authority was officially separated from the County; consequently, its expenditures are no longer reported here. Table 6.5 shows that $1,106,886 was spent on economic environment services in FY 2013/14. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2013/14, economic environment expenditures decreased by 57.12%. Since FY 2008/09, economic environment expenditures have increased by 69.37%. Economic environment expenses represented 0.52% of all county expenses in FY 2013/14. Higher expenses between FY 2008/09 and FY 2013/14 were the result of expenditure of Neighborhood Stabilization Program Community Development Block Grant funds, one time grants provided to lessen the negative affects of the economic downturn/recession and housing collapse. Human Services Human Services cover the cost of providing services for the care, treatment, and control of human illness, injury or disabilities, and for the welfare of the community as a whole and its individuals. The Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted ID e c • 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 71-7 21 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Health Department, Welfare, Medicaid, and Children's Services fall into this category. Table 6.5 shows that the County spent $7,178,542 on human services in FY 2013/14. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2013/14, human services expenditures increased by 3.25%. Since FY 2008/09, human services expenditures have decreased by 16.74%. Human Services represented 3.38% of all county expenses in FY 2013/14. Culture/Recreation All costs associated with providing and maintaining cultural and recreational facilities and activities for the benefit of citizens and visitors fit into this category. County libraries, parks, recreation operations, and the golf course are included here. As shown in table 6.5, the County spent $15,178,817 on those services in FY 2013/14. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2013/14, cultural/recreation expenditures increased by 3.87%. Since FY 2008/09, cultural/recreation expenditures have decreased by 22.65%. Culture/recreation expenses represented 7.15% of all County expenses in FY 2013/14. Court Related All costs of operating the judicial branch of Indian River County Government are classified here. That category includes the County Court, Circuit Court, State Attorney's Office and Public Defender. As shown in table 6.5, expenditures from that category totaled $6,487,906 in FY 2013/14. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2013/14, Court Related expenditures increased by 7.15%. Court Related costs represented 3.06% of all county expenses in FY 2013/14. Debt Service Debt service consists of interest and payments made by the county on its debt. That figure includes principal retirement, interest and other miscellaneous debt service. As table 6.5 indicates, total County debt service expenditures were $5,684,616 in FY 2013/14. Between fiscal years 2012/13 and 2013/14, debt service expenditures decreased by 30.41%. That decrease was due to the re -financing of a water and sewer revenue bond and the refinancing of a general obligation environmental lands bond during FY 2014/15. Since FY 2008/09, debt service expenditures have decreased by 29.55%. Debt service expenses represented 2.68% of all County expenses in FY 2013/14. Existing Outstanding Debt At the end of FY 2014/15, Indian River County's outstanding debt, comprised of revenue bonds and general obligation bonds, stood at $53,975,000. That is shown in table 6.6. Currently, Enterprise Funds comprise449.46% of the overall debt (Utility Dept), leaving $27,279,000 in bonds paid from general governmental funds. In November 2001, Indian River County issued the remaining $11,000,000 of the $26,000,000 Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'D ac.. ► 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 1 22 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element bonds originally approved by voters in 1992. Also in 2001, the County issued $16,810,000 in Spring Training Facility Bonds to finance the acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility (now known as Historic Dodgertown). In 2003, two bonds were refinanced to take advantage of lower interest rates: the 1993 Series Refunded Recreational Revenue Bonds and the 1995 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds. Those bonds have since been paid off. In 2004, Indian River County voters approved the issuance of up to an additional $50,000,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds. As a result, Indian River County issued $48,600,000 in Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition general obligation bonds in 2006. While the county refinanced its 1996 Series Water and Sewer Bonds in 2005 and the majority of its 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds in 2009, the County retained a portion of the 1993 Series A Water and Sewer Bonds with a maturity of 2011 because it was more cost efficient than rolling the entire amount into the 2009 Water and Sewer Bonds. That portion of the water and sewer bond has since been paid off. More recently, in 2015 the 2005 Series Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds and the 2006 Series Environmental Lands Acquisition Bonds were refinanced. Those bonds were refinanced to take advantage of better interest rates. This has substantially decreased the County's total bond debt. Table 6.6t.IndiOn River County Existing Lang Term Debts Iaitinl UUtA,Y$iAgG . " 10 �� k Amount Reiriaining Int#great . Mah!rriY_ : Bona R i#ti7ngu C�09OTZb15 hate _. Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds: 2015 Series $7,171,000 $7,171,000 1.65% 2022 N/A Water & Sewer Revenues 2009 Series $26,370,000 $19,525,000 3.68% 2024 AA+/AA Water & Sewer Revenues Recreation Revenue Bonds 2001 Series Spring $16,810,000 $7,230,000 o 4.87% 2031 AAA/FGIC State Funds &Tourist Tax Training Facility (Insured) Voted G.O. Bonds Environmental Lands Acquisition $20,369,000 $20,049,000 1.66% 2021 N/A General Obligation 2006 Series Total Bonds $53,975,000 Outstanding Source: Indian River County Budget 2015/16. Local Policies and Practices As part of the capital improvements planning process, it is important to do an inventory of current Indian River County policies and practices that guide the timing, location, expansion, or increase in Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'D ec - 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 23 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element capacity of capital facilities. Those policies and practices relate to the county's existing level -of - service standards, impact fee programs, comprehensive plan, and enterprise fund accounts. Existing Level -of -Service Standards Level -of -service (LOS) standards are indicators of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by, a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level -of -service standards indicate the capacity per unit of demand of each public facility. Level -of -service standards can affect the timing and location of development by guiding development to areas where facilities may have excess capacity. Indian River County has level -of -service standards for capital facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities (Countywide) • 4.5 beds per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores) • .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement (Unincorporated County) • 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries (Countywide) • 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population • 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Potable Water (County Service Area) 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Public Buildings (Countywide) • 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Parks/Recreation (Unincorporated County) • 6.61 acres per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Sanitary Sewer (County Service Area) • 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit ➢ Schools (School Service Area): Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'D e e- • 1 2015, Ordinance 2015- n i -Y 24 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element • 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Solid Waste (Countywide) • 2.2 tons per capita per year or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year ➢ Stormwater Management • New drainage systems shall mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event • Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local roads • The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year/24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads • All drainage basins will meet the following level -of -service standards: • By 2000 - 2 year/24 hour storm event • By 2005 - 5 year/24 hour storm event • By 2010 - 10 year/24 hour storm event ➢ Transportation (Roadways) ➢ Transit Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, and peak direction conditions on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%: • 27th Ave — South County Line to SR 60 • 43`d Ave - Oslo Road to 16`' Street For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service `B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas. One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes Level -of -service standards are discussed in further detail in individual Comprehensive Plan Elements. Asset-based level of service standards for impact fee calculation purposes are provided in the Impact Fee Ordinance (Title X). Capital Improvements Program A capital improvements program (CIP) is a list of capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet anticipated capital needs. In Indian River County, the CIP identifies the Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -D4-,-. ► , 2015, Ordinance 2015- o1-1 25 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element projects that the County plans to undertake in the next five years and presents an estimate of the costs and the resources needed to finance the projects. Revenue sources within the first year of the CIP reflect current fund balances as well as anticipated annual revenue collection. Within the first three years of the CIP, projects are funded entirely with "committed" revenue sources. "Committed" revenue sources are revenue sources that currently exist. Projects in years four and five of the CIP may be funded partially through "planned" revenue sources. "Planned" revenue sources are sources available to the County that have not been utilized. The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) itself consolidates the capital improvements needs of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan into an overall five-year Capital Improvements Schedule. The overall program lists the needs, costs, timeframes, priorities, and the necessary financial resources to implement the identified capital improvement projects in the various elements of the plan in the next five years. Impact Fees/Caaacity Charges Impact fees are charges to developers for off-site improvements that must be provided by the local government to serve new development. That financing technique is one strategy that the County uses to implement the CIE. Currently, the County has nine impact fees in place; those are traffic impact fees, which became effective in 1986, and eight additional impact fees which became effective in June of 2005. Those eight impact fees are assessed for the following service delivery categories: solid waste, public schools, fire/ems, parks and recreation, correctional facilities, law enforcement, libraries, and public buildings. In 2009, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) voted to suspend five of the nine impact fees for a period of six months. Their intent in doing so was to help encourage development during the economic recession. Since then, the BCC has voted several times to maintain the suspension of at least three of the impact fees. Most recently, the Board of County Commissioners completed a review of all impact fees, and on April 22, 2014 adopted a revised reduced nonresidential impact fee schedule with an effective date of May 5, 2014 and adopted a revised residential impact fee schedule on October 14, 2014 with an effective date of February 2, 2015. For the new impact fee schedule, the Board of County Commissioners voted to not collect the correctional facilities, solid waste facilities, and libraries impact fees at this time. In October 1999, the county's water and sewer impact fees were reclassified as capacity charges. A capacity charge is a fee charged to the direct beneficiaries of water and sewer improvements in order to fund the capital cost incurred by the water and wastewater utility to provide capacity to serve new utility customers. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are used to account for operations financed and operated in a manner similar to private businesses, when the intent of the governing body is that the full costs of providing the service to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Community Development Department Indian River County Adoptedy e c - 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- o 11 26 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Currently, the County operates its solid waste services, golf course facility, building division services, and utility services as enterprise funds. As a tool for affecting the timing and location of development, user charges may be designated to vary with the quantity and location of the service provided. Thus, charges could be greater for providing services further from urban areas and less for distances closer to urban areas. In this way, user charges could affect the economics of development locating further away from urban areas. Analysis The analysis section of this element assesses the County's historic and projected revenue and expenditure patterns to determine the County's fiscal ability to provide adequate capital improvements. Those capital improvements have been identified in other comprehensive plan elements and are needed to meet the demands of existing and future development. As part of this analysis, revenue and expenditure projections are identified and analyzed, and a fiscal assessment of needs (costs) versus projected available revenue is included. Analysis of the Timing and Location of Capital Improvements Objectives and policies from the Future Land Use Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Recreation and Open Space Element, Public School Facilities Element, and the Transportation Element, as well as policies followed by the Sheriff's office and County departments such as Emergency Management, Corrections, Libraries, and Solid Waste, have the most direct effect on the timing and location of capital improvements. Through planning for future improvements to the transportation system, the Transportation Element directly affects the development potential of property. Also affecting the development potential of property are the water and sewer connection requirements and the availability of parks, and public school capacity. Within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), the assignment of land use density and intensity, as well as the urban service area regulations, affect the timing and location of capital improvements. Consistent with the FLUE and urban service area requirements in the County's comprehensive plan, the County provides public facilities and services to promote compact development by emphasizing infill development in urban areas and maximizing the efficiency of existing facilities and services in under utilized areas. The FLUE also limits urban sprawl and ensures that adequate facilities will be present to accommodate future growth. Maximizing the use of existing facilities and controlling urban sprawl will contribute to a cost-effective and efficient service delivery system. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted tiB& • 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 011 27 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Using the County's official Future Land Use Map and Future Thoroughfare Plan Map, as well as the County's water and wastewater connection matrix, in planning for future locations of facilities provides for efficient and orderly expansion of public facilities, provides for efficient growth in desired areas, discourages growth in undesirable areas, and protects environmentally sensitive lands. Consistent with that policy, development orders are issued only after a determination is made that adequate public facilities and services will be available to meet the demand of new development. Overall, the objectives of the FLUE, Transportation Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, and the Public School Facilities Element are furthered by the extension of facilities and services in a logical and efficient manner. That is accomplished by implementing the adopted Capital Improvements Element and its corresponding Schedule of Capital Improvements. Successful and efficient implementation of those items ensures that facilities and services will be in place concurrent with future demand. If a capital improvements project is not included in the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements and the improvement is required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards, future development will be prohibited until the necessary facilities are in place. That, in effect, indirectly controls the timing and location of future development and, in turn, furthers the implementation of the Future Land Use Element and Transportation Element objectives. Appendix A constitutes the County's five year schedule of capital improvements. The purpose of the CIP is to ensure that improvements to existing facilities and construction of new facilities are completed as needed. By implementing the five year schedule of capital improvements, the county will ensure that appropriate areas will be served by needed facilities, thus maintaining adopted levels of service. Besides implementing the components of this element, the County coordinates with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the various state agencies, such as the Florida Department of Transportation, when those agencies program facility or service improvements within Indian River County. The continuation of that coordination will ensure that the plans of state agencies and the SJRWMD will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the timing and location of capital improvements as identified in the CIE. Forecasted Revenues In order to develop a financially feasible schedule of capital improvements, projected revenues over the five-year CIP time period are calculated. Those revenues are then compared to anticipated expenditures on capital improvements. For the first three years of the plan, only committed and available revenue sources are utilized. In developing revenue estimates for that process, the County considers historic revenue trends, current and anticipated economic conditions, population and growth trends, legislative changes, and any other factors that may impact future revenue streams. That Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Vec . 1 1 2015, Ordinance 2015- o 1728 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element analysis is far more complex than projecting prior trends into the future. That is evident in the forecasted revenues shown in this section. Since the start of the decline of the housing boom and throughout the economic recession that followed, there was a gradual decrease in most of the County's revenue sources. With the ongoing economic recovery, forecasts show an overall increase in total revenue through FY 2019/20, of 2.5%. Table 6.7 indicates that Fiscal Year 2015/16 total revenue is higher than each of the other projected fiscal year totals because Fiscal Year 2015/16 includes approximately $50 million in existing fund balances listed under "Other Sources". Not including the existing fund balance item, the projected total revenues for Fiscal Year 2015/16 is less than subsequent fiscal years. Many of the revenue sources identified in the CIP have unique characteristics. For example, sales taxes react differently than gas taxes to similar circumstances. The analysis accounts for such differences. Because gas taxes are levied on a per gallon basis rather than a price percentage basis like the sales tax, gas taxes do not increase as a result of rising prices the way that sales taxes do. Further, gas taxes do not typically decline as significantly as sales taxes during economic slowdowns. For property taxes, impact fees, user fees, interest earnings, and other revenues, additional behavioral characteristics were considered in forecasting future receipts. All such forecasts were developed with the use of professionally accepted methodologies. To ensure a financially balanced CIP (see Appendix A), scheduled expenditures were constrained by projected revenues. As part of this capital improvements element, the County's general revenues were forecasted for fiscal years 2015/16 through 2019/20. This section addresses general revenues and earmarked projected revenues as well as the county's tax base and millage rate projections. Overall Forecasted Revenues Table 6.7 summarizes the County's forecasted revenue for fiscal years 2015/16 through 2019/20. Those revenues include the County's general governmental funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds. As table 6.7 shows, general revenue collected by the County is forecast to remain relatively level from fiscal year 2015/16 to fiscal year 2019/20,. As noted in the above Forecasted Revenues section, Fiscal Year 2015/16 projected total revenues include approximately $50 million in existing fund balances. This balance is not reflected in the totals going forward. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted TJ e -- . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015 -tel 29 Table 6.7: Overall General Revenue IF, p tia> - Sum7pata r 2015/16 2016117 2017/18. Zt)18f19 2419120' �4`}L FY $109,118,750' $563,880,702 Taxes $109,514,952 $112,253,000 $115,059,000 $117,935,000 Permits, Fees & $26,953,811 $27,628,000 $28,319,000 $29,027,000 $29,753,000 $141,680,811 Special Assess. Intergovern- $20,294,955 $20,802,000 $21,322,000 $21,855,000 $22,401,000 $106,674,955 ment Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted TJ e -- . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015 -tel 29 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 6.7: Overall Genera! Revenue Projection Summary' ` 2015/1b 2016%1'1- ''20 118 2018/19 2019/20, FY . Charges for $66,533,702 $68,197,000 $69,902,000 $71,650,000 $73,441,000 $349,723,702 Services Judgements, Fines & $438,350 $449,000 $460,000 $472,000 $484,000 $2,303,350 Forfeitures Interest & Misc. $6,322,524 $6,481,000 $6,643,000 $6,809,000 $6,979,000 $33,234,524 Other Sources 95,392,764 70,989,317 62,362,653 60,186,859 64,122,262 $353,053,854 TOTAL 325,451,058 306,799,317 304,067,653 307,934,859 306,299,012 $1,550,551,898 Source: Indian River County Ott -ice of Management and nudget. ' This reduction is associated with the scheduled expiration of the voter approved one cent optional sales tax. • Earmarked Projected Revenues Earmarked revenues are revenues that are restricted in terms of use. Such revenues may be found in the Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element, Potable Water Sub -Element, and Solid Waste Sub -Element. Table 6.8 provides a summary of earmarked revenue forecasts by applicable comprehensive plan element for fiscal years 2015/16 through 2019/20. As shown in table 6.8, forecasted transportation revenues are broken down by their sources. Earmarked forecasted transportation revenues are expected to decrease by 41.81% over the next five fiscal years, from $22,395,000 in FY 2015/16 to $13,031,750 in FY 2019/20. This reduction is associated with the scheduled expiration of the voter approved one cent optional sales tax in FY 2019/20. For potable water and sanitary sewer, earmarked revenue is expected to increase by 10.3 8% over the next five fiscal years, from $31,155,667 in FY 2015/16 to $34,390,000 in FY 2019/20. Over the next five years, earmarked revenue for solid waste is expected to increase by 10.39% from $13,137,435 in FY 2015/16 to $14,502,000 in FY 2019/20. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'p e -- • i , 2015, Ordinance 2015- o 11 30 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 6.$: Earmarked Projected Revenue by Comprehensive Plan`Element illage.Prajeet%ns, ., ndian`Riyer.County,Taa Ease andI11, Transportatiod I'0C General Fund . M S T.U. Emergency'Servic c D>stnct� 1 cent Interest onq Fiscal S©tyWaste Year optionTGas Constitutional Coud{`T. R`optional Trai�c Tait Base Millage ' Iotnl . 2015/16 3.3602 $7,924,354,271 lax, Gas Tax. Impact Fee salmi tax Gas Tax $14,705,834,937 3.3602 $8,122,463,128 2015/16 $3,275,000 $1,620,000 $710,000 $2,250,000 $14,500,000 $40,000 $22,395,000 $31,155,667 $13,137,435 2016/17 $3,308,000 $1,636,000 $717,000 $2,500,000 $14,935,000 $60,000 $23,156,000 $31,935,000 $13,466,000 2017/18 $3,341,000 $1,652,000 $724,000 $2,750,000 $15,383,000 $120,000 $23,970,000 $32,733,000 $13,803,000 2018/19 $3,374,000 $1,669,000 $731,000 $3,000,000 $15,844,000 $120,000 $24,738,000 $33,551,000 $14,148,000 2019/20 $3,408,000 $1,686,000 $738,000 $3,000,000 $4,079,750* $120,000 $13,031,750 j $34,390,000 $14,502,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. * This reduction is associated with the scheduled expiration of the voter approved one cent optional sales tax. * Tax Base, Assessment Ratio, Millage Rate Table 6.9 summarizes the county's tax base forecasts which are categorized by fund through FY 2019/20. Overall, the countywide ad valorem tax base is the same as the general fund category identified in table 6.9. Table 6.9 illage.Prajeet%ns, ., ndian`Riyer.County,Taa Ease andI11, General Fund . M S T.U. Emergency'Servic c D>stnct� z Fiscal t . , Year Tax Base Millage Tax Base Millage Tait Base Millage ' Tax ,ase. Mlla$e 2015/16 $14,347,156,036 3.3602 $7,924,354,271 1.0733 $11,751,256,935 2.2551 $14,347,156,036 0.3315 2016/17 $14,705,834,937 3.3602 $8,122,463,128 1.0733 $12,045,038,358 2.2551 $14,705,834,937 0.3232 2017/18 $15,073,480,810 3.3602 $8,325,524,706 1.0733 $12,346,164,317 2.2551 $15,073,480,810 0.3151 2018/19 $15,450,317,830 3.3602 $8,533,662,824 1.0733 $12,654,818,425 2.2551 $15,450,317,830 0.3073 2019/20 $15,836,575,776 3.3602 $8,747,004,395 1.0733 $12,971,188,886 2.2551 $15,836,575,776 0.2996 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. As shown in table 6.9, the county has a Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) and an emergency services district, each with a separate millage. Changes to the Capital Improvements Program With the gradual improving economy, County revenue increased in Fiscal Year 2014/15. County revenue is expected to continue to slowly increase through Fiscal Year 2016/17 above what was previously forecasted in the prior year's Capital Improvements Program With this year's update, some projects have had their timeframes extended and some have had their funding sources changed as other entities have agreed to take over funding of the projects. While Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted pe c . 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- (317_ 31 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element some project time frames have been extended, none of the extensions will impact development project concurrency reservations. With respect to transportation projects, available roadway capacity has recently increased because concurrency certificates for some development projects with vested trips have expired. These trips are now reflected as available in the County's concurrency management system. It is also anticipated that additional concurrency certificates will soon expire. For some of those projects, owners will not re- apply for new concurrency certificates if non -traffic impact fees would be due or if the owner decides not to pay for the updated traffic analysis which would be required with any new concurrency application. With respect to transportation funding, MOT has recently agreed to take over management and funding of CR 510 between CR 512 and 58th Avenue. This has freed up some available funds for the County. Those funds are now being reflected in other transportation projects, including 66`h Avenue between 83`d Street and 491h Street. Other projects in the Transportation 5 year CIP schedule are included; however, notes have been added to the schedule indicating that completion of the projects is dependent upon extension of the local one cent sales tax. By extending the timeframe of transportation projects, the County can utilize its limited resources to complete priority concurrency related projects within the overall capital improvements program. In effect, the County needs to delay some projects so that other projects will remain fundable and so that additional priority projects maybe funded. By funding necessary projects and other priority projects, and by extending the time frames for other projects, the County is maintaining a financially feasible capital improvements element. Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program The Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program is a list of transportation projects for which a specific start date and a specific completion date are listed. As allowed by state law, the County considers the additional capacity to be produced by those roadway improvement projects as being available now for concurrency purposes. As such, a development project impacting a deficient link can proceed despite the deficient link, where a roadway improvement project for the deficient link will be under construction no later than three years after issuance of the first building permit for the development project. In 2010, because of lower demand and/or a slower increase in demand on area roadways from the depressed housing market and the pending expiration of concurrency certificates for previously approved developments, it was determined that the Priority Transportation Capital Improvements Program (PTCIP) was no longer needed, and was removed from the CIE. Given the slow increase in demand due to the gradually recovering housing market, the PTCIP has not been re -introduced at this time. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -o 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- d 1 32 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Needs Assessment Based on public facility requirements identified in the other comprehensive plan elements, this needs assessment identifies the capital improvements required to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet proposed levels of service for existing and new development. For purposes of the CIE, a capital improvement is a substantial facility (land, building or major equipment) that costs at least $100,000 and may be paid for in phases. Table 6.10 identifies capital improvement needs through fiscal year 2019/20 for conservation & aquifer recharge, emergency services, general services, law enforcement & corrections, recreation and open space, stormwater management, sanitary sewer and potable water, solid waste, transportation, and public schools. Appendix A provides a detailed list of projects associated with each of the comprehensive plan elements as well as those projects associated with individual department capital improvements programs. Not included in Appendix A are projects associated with the Public School Facilities Element. Those projects are found in Appendix C. Detailed capital improvement schedules, which list each improvement project, are provided in each applicable Comprehensive Plan Element or within individual master plans for the respective governmental service. Table 6,10.,Future Capital.Improvement Expenditures for, Indian River County" Tnilian River Cour>I School Distlrict " = Element or Category 2015I1G `2016/12 201'x/18; Q' yy� ` t 2olO� C ". n yy�,jyj_A a {� R'i _i� fi 7 /� �0 �4 . Conservation & Aquifer Recharge $719,771 $475,000 $650,000 $725,000 $350,000 $2,919,771 Emergency Services $3,735,000 $5,720,000 $3,260,000 $1,470,000 $7,875,000 $22,060,000 General Services $6,097,088 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,097,088 Law Enforcement & Corrections $1,425,000 $525,000 $0 $1,750,000 $1,650,000 $5,350,000 Recreation & Open Space $8,382,841 $450,000 $2,300,000 $0 $0 $11,132,841 Sanitary Sewer & Potable Water** $6,295,700 $5,044,300 $5,750,000 $5,350,000 $4,400,000 $26,840,000 Solid Waste $7,274,000 $4,505,000 $0 $0 $1,070,000 $12,849,000 Stormwater Management $1,305,727 $150,000 $400,000 $5,900,000 $200,000 $7,955,727 Transportation $33,482,358 $31,474,847 $25,489,063 $22,915,960 $18,866,262 $132,228,490 Total $68,717,485 $48,344,147 $37,849,063 $38,110,960 $34,411,262 $227,432,917 Public School Facilities* $10,506,762 $10,073,135 $11,452,191 $12,694,104 $13,924,739 $58,650,931 *The School District of Indian River County has the fiscal responsibility for capital improvement expenditures for public school facilities. **This includes estimated costs for conversion of the current water meter system to an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system, as recommended by a County commissioned feasibility study. A formal recommendation for this will soon be brought to the Board for consideration and the 5 year CIP can be modified as necessary with the next annual update. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted P « • 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 11 33 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Figure 6.18 graphically displays the forecasted capital improvements expenditures for the County during the next five fiscal years. As indicated, the sum of the total projected costs for each of the elements for the five year period is $227,432,917. Some public facilities, such as public education and health systems, are provided countywide, but are not the fiscal responsibility of the County. The County, however, is required by state statutes to provide some funds to the Indian River County Health Department (IRCHD). Consistent with state law, the Secretary of the Florida Department of Health appoints the administrator of the IRCHD with the concurrence of the Board of County Commissioners. The IRCHD maintains its financial records, and prepares its own financial report separate from the county. In the Public School Facilities Element of the County's comprehensive plan, there is an analysis and description of public schools. Based on general locational criteria for public schools, it is assumed that any new facilities which may be constructed in the County by 2019/20 will be located within existing infrastructure service areas or designated expansion areas. Therefore, those systems may be considered to be adequately served by appropriate infrastructure. $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 Figure 6.18: Future Capital Improvement Expenditures FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 aConservation & Aquifer Recharge OEmergency Services DGeneral Services/Facilities Mgmnt ■Law Enforcement & Corrections BRecreation & Open Space ■Sanitary Sewer& Potable Water ■Solid Waste aStormwater Management ©Transportation Fiscal Assessment This section examines the County's ability to fund the capital improvements listed in table 6. 10, with the exception of public school facilities, and assesses whether sufficient revenue will be available Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted i1 « - 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 1 34 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element within the existing budget framework utilized by the County to fund the needed improvements at the time that those improvements will be required. This assessment process consists of forecasting future revenue receipts and comparing those receipts to anticipated expenditures. With this process, it is possible to quantify annual revenue surpluses and shortfalls, providing a basis for examining opportunities for financing needed capital improvements. The expenditure estimates include operating costs. For the public school facilities listed in table 6.10, the School District of Indian River County is responsible for funding the capital improvements. The School District's adopted "Summary of Capital Improvements Program" (Appendix C) and "Summary of Estimated Revenue" (Appendix D) provide a detailed review of the financial feasibility of the School District's Five Year Capital Plan. Proiected Expenditures Table 6.11 shows the County's projected expenditures for fiscal years 2015/16 through 2019/20. By fiscal year 2019/20, the County is forecasted to have annual expenditures totaling $306,299,012. In FY 2019/20, the category projected to have the largest expenditures is the Public Safety category. For the five-year period beginning in fiscal year 2015/16 and ending in fiscal year 2019/20, the County's expenditures are forecast to decrease by 6.48%. Table 6.11 iadian River Cau»ty Overall General Expendi#ores Projectiaq Su><nma-7 FY ',2015/16- 2016/17 2017/18 '� 201f1(}1►(20 .. - General Gov't. Services $51,177,403 $46,207,000 $47,362,000 $48,546,000 $49,760,000 Public Safety $83,501,246 $86,545,000 $85,568,000 $87,586,000 $96,000,000 Physical Environment $67,786,686 $63,670,300 $61,633,000 $68,179,000 $63,629,000 Transportation $51,576,951 $50,021,847 $44,500,063 $42,401,960 $38,839,262 Economic Environment $411,520 $422,000 $433,000 $444,000 $455,000 Human Services $7,456,576 $7,643,000 $7,834,000 $8,030,000 $8,231,000 Culture/Recreation $22,621,050 $15,044,000 $17,259,000 $15,333,000 $15,716,000 Debt Service $5,483,587 $5,244,170 $5,284,590 $1,092,899 $866,750 Other $35,436,039 $32,002,000 $34,194,000 $36,322,000 $32,802,000 TOTAL $325,451,058 $306,799,317 $304,067,653 $307,934,859 $306,299,012 Source: Indian liver County Umce or management ana mages. Earmarked Projected Expenditures Table 6.12 identifies the projected expenditures for the water, sewer, and solid waste enterprise funds for fiscal years 2015/16 through 2019/20. Those expenditures include operating expenses and other expenses for each year. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted ate . I , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 11 35 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element According to law, all revenues from capacity charges must be spent on infrastructure improvements that benefit the payer of the capacity charge. Therefore, capacity charge revenue and expenditure amounts increase and decrease with development. For that reason, forecasting capacity charge revenues and expenditures is difficult. That system, however, ensures that new development will not reduce levels of service below County minimums. Table 6.12: Projectted Expenses for Water, $ewver, and Solid Waste Fiscal Year Potable Water &Sanitary Sewer Solid Weste 2015/16 $37,451,367 $20,411,435 2016/17 $36,979,300 $17,971,000 2017/18 $38,483,000 $13,803,000 2018/19 $38,901,000 $14,148,000 2019/20 $38,790,000 $15,572,000 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. In FY 2019/20, the forecast expenses for potable water and sanitary sewer services are expected to be $38,790,000. That is an increase of 3.45% from the FY 2015/16 forecast expenses of $37,451,367. Table 6.12 shows that, in FY 2019/20, the projected expenses for solid waste services are expected to be $15,572,000. That is a decrease of 31.08% from the 2015/16 projected figure of $20,411,435. Operating Cost Proiections Table 6.13 provides forecasts of overall operating costs for the County for fiscal years 2015/16 through 2019/20. In fiscal year 2019/20, the County is forecast to incur approximately $239,085,750 in operating costs. Based on the figures shown in table 6.13, the county's operating costs are forecast to increase 7.44% between 2015/16 and 2019/20. Tabie 6.13: Indian River ountv, Overall Operitle Cost Pro sections r FiscalYear Total eratin Costs 2015/16 $221,297,534 2016/17 $226,031,170 2017/18 $232,024,590 2018/19 $233,501,899 2019/20 $239,085,750 Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted P « . 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 36 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Proiected Debt Capacity Debt Financing is one way that the county has provided for its capital facility needs. The primary rationale for providing capital facilities through indebtedness is that it spreads the cost of a facility over its useful life and thus is paid for by those who will use the facility. Table 6.14 identifies the amount of revenue that the County can raise by issuing revenue bonds. Those bonds can be issued without a public vote. That table identifies the County's bonding capacity for 10, 20, and 30 years. As table 6.14 indicates, the County's available bonding capacity for a 10 year issue is $189,000,000, while its bonding capacity for a 30 year issue is $409,700,000. Table 6.14: Indian River Cou", .Estimated' flity, to Raise. Bonds; W'ltk6 A 0ub>� Pledge $aurces TetiNears :, (Bond Interest Rate '@ 2:23°fa) Twenty,Years a (Bond Inters"st Rated .(BanT°„� in ate" 3A3, '^ _ Half Cent Sales Tax $68,700,000 $119,300,000 $155,000,000 Gas Taxes $45,900,000 $77,900,000 $93,300,000 Tourist Tax $14,400,000 $24,400,000 $31,200,000 County Revenue Program First Guaranteed Entitlement $1,800,000 $3,100,000 $4,000,000 County Revenue Program Second Guaranteed Entitlement $3,800,000 $6,400,000 $8,200,000 Sub -Total $134,600,000 $231,100,000 $291,700,000 Possible Pledge Sources Franchise Fees $39,400,000 $66,900,000 $85,500,000 Road Impact Fees $15,000,000 $25,400,000 $32,500,000 Sub -Total $54,400,000 $92,300,000 $118,000,000 TOTAL $189,000,000 $323,400,000 $409,700,000 *Rates are comparable term AAA rated municipal bond yields as of 8/27/2015. Source: Indian River County Office of Management and Budget. Debt Service Obligations In table 6.15, the County's debt service obligations for current and anticipated bond issues are summarized. Debt service is payment of principal and interest on obligations resulting from the issuance of bonds. As table 6.15 indicates, the County's major anticipated outstanding debts are for Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted n < < - 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015-0 37 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element water and sewer revenue bonds, environmentally sensitive land acquisition bonds, and spring training facility revenue bonds. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted t7 Cc . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 38 Interest $1,067,000 $77,017 $394,713 Principal $1,815,000 $320,000 $470,000 Total $2,882,000 $397,017 $864,713 2015 Balance $19,525,000 $20,049,000 $7,171,000 $7,230,000 Interest $976,250 $332,813 $119,635 $370,038 Principal $1,905,000 $343,000 $973,000 $495,000 Total $2,881,250 $675,813 $1,092,635 $865,038 2016 Balance $17,620,000 $19,706,000 $6,198,000 $6,735,000 Interest $881,000 $327,120 $102,267 $344,050 Principal $2,000,000 $4,053,000 $992,000 $520,000 Total $2,881,000 $4,380,120 $1,094,267 $864,050 2017 Balance $15,620,000 $15,653,000 $5,206,000 $6,215,000 Interest $781,000 $259,840 $85,899 $316,750 Principal $2,100,000 $4,158,000 $1,007,000 $550,000 Total $2,881,000 $4,417,840 $1,092,899 $866,750 2018 Balance $13,520,000 $11,495,000 $4,199,000 $5,665,000 Interest $676,000 $190,817 $69,284 $287,875 Principal $2,205,000 $4,227,000 $1,025,000 $585,000 Total $2,881,000 $4,417,817 $1,094,284 $872,875 2019 Balance $11,315,000 $7,268,000 $3,174,000 $5,080,000 Interest $565,750 $120,649 $52,371 $257,163 Principal $2,315,000 $4,298,000 $1,042,000 $615,000 Total $2,880,750 $4,418,649 $1,094,371 $872,163 2020 Balance $9,000,000 $2,970,000 $2,132,000 $4,465,000 Interest $450,000 $49,302 $35,178 $224,875 Principal $2,430,000 $2,970,000 $1,058,000 $650,000 Total $2,880,000 $3,019,302 $1,093,178 $874,875 2021 Balance $6,570,000 $0 $1,074,000 $3,815,000 Interest $328,500 $17,721 $190,750 Principal $2,550,000 $1,074,000 $305,000 Total $2,878,500 $1,091,721 $495,750 2022 Balance $4,020,000 $0 $3,510,000 Interest $201,000 $175,500 Principal $2,680,000 $320,000 2023 Total 1 $2,881,000 $495,500 Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted t7 Cc . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 38 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Y A Balance $1,340,000 $3,190,000 Interest $67,000 $159,500 Principal $1,340,000 $340,000 Total $1,407,000 $499,500 2024 Balance $0 $2,850,000 Interest $142,500 Princi al $355,000 Total $497,500 2025 Balance $2,495,000 Interest $124,750 Principal $375,000 Total 1 $499,750 2026 Balance $2,120,000 Interest $106,000 Principal $390,000 Total $496,000 2027 Balance $1,730,000 Interest $86,500 Princi al $410,000 Total $496,500 2028 Balance $1,320,000 Interest $66,000 Princi al $430,000 Total $496,000 2029 Balance $890,000 Interest $44,500 Principal $455,000 Total 1 $499,500 2030 Balance $435,000 Interest $21,750 Principal $435,000 Total $456,750 2031 Balance $0 Source: Indian River County Office of Management ana tsuaget. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted v s:c. , 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- o2 2 39 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Fiscal Assessment Summary This section provides an analysis of the County's revenues and expenditures for its capital improvement needs for the five-year period beginning in FY 2015/16 and ending in FY 2019/20. While Appendix A details all of the capital improvement projects for the next five fiscal years for each individual comprehensive plan element by cost, timeframe, and revenue source(s), Table 6.7 provides general revenue projections for the County through fiscal year 2019/20. As shown in Table 6.7, the County will generate $1,550,551,898 in revenues from general funds, enterprise funds, and internal funds from fiscal year 2015/16 to fiscal year 2019/20. Sources of those funds include sales taxes, property taxes, grants, impact fees, and other revenues. The funding needed for the capital improvements listed within Appendix A will come from that $1,550,551,898. Overall, the County will have enough revenue to cover the costs associated with the five year capital improvements program. For all projects contained within the County's Capital Improvements project list, the total estimated cost is $227,432,917 for the next five fiscal years. This is 14.67% of the overall general fund revenues for the same time period. Concurrency Management Plan To ensure that level -of -service standards are maintained, it is necessary to have a system in place that provides the criteria for measuring facility capacity, assessing development demand on applicable facilities, and monitoring service levels for applicable facilities. That system will set the parameters for issuing development orders consistent with level -of -service standards. While this concurrency management plan sets policies and establishes a process, the specific application of this system is through the County's land development regulations. As per state requirements, those regulations define the details of the concurrency management system and establish its administrative requirements. The major purpose of the concurrency management system is to detail the specifics of implementing the County's level -of -service standards. For that reason, the concurrency management system must apply to all development activity in the County. The system must then identify the applicable standards for each facility, the geographic scope of each facility, and the method of monitoring facility capacity changes. Most importantly, this system must specify when facilities are considered available. Project Applicability All development orders issued by the County must comply with the concurrency management plan and meet level -of -service standards. Development orders are County approvals for construction and/or land development activity. Specifically, development orders consist of the following: comprehensive plan amendments, rezonings, site plan approvals, preliminary plat approvals, Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted a « - 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 40 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element development of regional impact (DRI) approvals, planned development preliminary approvals, and building permit approvals for single-family homes located in subdivisions which were approved after February 13, 1990, the original adoption date of the county's comprehensive plan. Within Indian River County, the impact from the construction of a single family home on an existing subdivision platted lot may constitute a de minimus impact on public facilities and thus be exempt from the concurrency requirement. Indian River County applies the single family de minimus allowance to single family building permits in subdivisions platted before February 13, 1990. Service Standards Level -of -service standards for concurrency related facilities are established in this plan for the following facilities: sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste, stormwater management, recreation, public schools, and transportation. Those are explained in detail in the applicable comprehensive plan elements. For each facility, level -of -service is a measure of the relationship between demand for the service and the capacity of the facility. Capacity, however, is measured differently for each type of facility. Table 6.16 identifies both the capacity and demand measures for each public facility. Those measures are addressed in detail, and existing capacities are identified in the applicable Comprehensive Plan Elements. Table 6.16: $ervice Level Measures for Concurrency 12elated Facilities . Public Facility CategoryeciEic Facility Capacity Measure Demand Measure Fay A k V Transportation Roadway Volume of cars accommodated over time Peak Season/Peak Direction/Peak Hour Trips Affected Roadways Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant Treatment design Capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area Potable Water Treatment Plant Treatment Design Capacity Generation Rate (GPD) Service Area (GPD) Volume in active cell (cubic Generation Rate (tons per Entire County Solid Waste Landfill yards) capita per year) Recreation Parks Acres of park land Acres of parks per thousand population Entire County Stormwater Management Drainage Volume of water Volume of stormwater outfalling for design storm Basin conveyances Education* Public Schools (K- Number of Children Enrolled Students/ Future Service Area 12) accommodated over time Student Generation *Limited to participating Schools owned and operated by the Indian River County school District Concurrency requires that each facility within the geographic scope of a proposed project's impact area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the project's demand. If that capacity is not available, Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Oe -c • 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 41 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element the project cannot be approved. The principal function of the concurrency management system then is to provide a mechanism whereby demand and capacity measures can be compared on a project by project basis. Table 6.16 provides the criteria for establishing a demand to capacity comparison for a proposed project. While most of the characteristics are self-explanatory, one needs clarification; that is the geographic scope for the traffic public facility category. For concurrency purposes, affected roadways are those roadways impacted by a project's traffic. Regardless of size, all projects impact the roadway on which the project fronts. In addition, other roadways further removed from the project may be impacted. For concurrency purposes, two lane roadways which are assigned 8 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips and four or more lane roadways that are assigned 15 or more peak hour/peak season/peak direction project trips are considered impacted roadways. For transportation concurrency related facilities, level -of -service standards are applied to all impacted roadways. Those level -of -service standards range from A to F and are associated with peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips. Demand Demand is an important component of the concurrency management system. Essentially, demand is a measure of facility use. When compared to facility capacity, demand can indicate the level -of -service for the facility. As depicted in Table 6.16, demand can be measured quantitatively for each public facility category. While the demand function for each facility consists of applying a rate to the number of facility users, estimation of total demand is more complex. For concurrency management purposes, demand can be divided into three types: existing, committed, and projected. Each must be considered separately for purposes of concurrency management. Existing Demand Existing demand is simply the current level of use for a facility. For a roadway, it is the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips; for a school, it is the number of full-time enrolled students; for water and wastewater treatment plants, it is the existing flow volume measured in gallons per day. Those figures are included within applicable plan elements. Existing demand then reflects the use of a facility by the current population. When compared to capacity, existing demand can show if the facility has unused capacity or if it is functioning over capacity. Existing demand, however, is not static. As population increases and dwelling units come on-line, existing demand increases. Those increases in existing demand can be identified through facility use measurements. For example, regular traffic counts done on roads or treatment plant flow records are Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -Dec . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0I 42 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element examples of facility use measurements indicating existing demand levels. As existing demand levels for facilities are updated, committed demand levels must be reduced if projects representing committed demand have come on-line. Committed Demand Committed demand is a measure of the impact that approved development projects with reserved capacity will have on facilities. When added to existing demand for a facility, the committed demand for that facility will produce a more accurate estimate of unused capacity. That estimate of unused capacity represents the amount of capacity that can realistically be allocated to new projects. Committed demand must be determined by identifying all projects for which capacity has been reserved through issuance of initial concurrency certificates which are still valid. Then the specific facilities that will be impacted by those projects with reserved capacities must be determined; those facilities will be roadways and the landfill, and they may be treatment plants, drainage conveyances, and recreation facilities. Finally, the total demand on each facility attributable to committed demand will be determined. Applicable elements of the plan identify the rates to be applied to each project to determine facility demand. Traffic volumes, for example, can be derived by applying a trip rate to the size of the project. Sanitary sewer and potable water both have rates of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. Other public facility rates are discussed fully in their applicable Comprehensive Plan Element. Like existing demand, committed demand must be determined on a facility by facility basis. For example, both existing demand and committed demand must be determined for each major roadway, each school, each treatment plant, each major drainage conveyance, and the active cell in the landfill. Also, like existing demand, committed demand estimates must be modified as projects are completed; committed demand estimates must also be modified as new development orders are approved and old development orders are terminated. Protected Demand The third type of demand is projected demand. This consists of two types. One is non- committed/non-reserved, single-family lot demand for all subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990, while the other is new project demand. Non-committed/non-reserved single-family lot projected demand relates to the facility impacts associated with construction on single-family lots in subdivisions platted after February 13, 1990 and construction on single-family unplatted lots and acreage. Since that type of construction will impact facilities, the demand anticipated from that type of activity must be considered in facility expansion Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'rJ « - 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015-_LL;L__ 43 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element plans. For that reason, it is necessary to maintain an accurate inventory of unbuilt, platted lots and consider the impacts of construction on those lots. The second type of projected demand is new project demand. For each new project, demand estimates must be made on a facility by facility basis. Only if sufficient available capacity exists for each facility to be impacted can the project be approved and a development order issued. Upon issuance of a development order, the estimated impacts on each facility would be considered as committed demand. Availability of Capacity Facility capacity can be assessed two different ways. First, facility capacity can be determined by facilities that are existing and available; examples would be existing treatment plants and existing roadways with a set number of lanes. The second manner for assessing facility capacity is to consider both existing, in -the -ground facilities as well as facility expansions or new facilities which are programmed but not yet existing. As part of the concurrency review process, the capacity of existing, in -the -ground facilities will be considered in all cases. Programmed facilities will be considered in assessing capacity for each public facility category when the following conditions are met: ➢ For sanitary sewer, potable water, solid waste and drainage facilities: 1. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services are in place and available to serve the new development; or 2. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement to be in place and available to serve new development at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. ➢ For parks and recreation facilities: 1. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under actual construction; or 2. A development order or permit is issued subject to the condition that, at the time of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent, the acreage for the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development is dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair share are committed; and Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -D e c . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- c i i 44 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element a. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the necessary facilities and services needed to serve the new development are in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or b. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the necessary facilities and services to serve the new development to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent; or c. At the time the development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, to be in place or under actual construction not more than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. ➢ Transportation supply (capacity). Transportation supply shall be determined on a segment by segment basis. For concurrency purposes, all segments on the county's thoroughfare plan shall be considered. Capacity for segments will be based either on FDOT's generalized capacity tables or individual segment capacity studies approved by the public works director pursuant to the criteria specified in Chapter 952, Traffic. Transportation supply for each segment is: 1. The segment's existing peak hour, peak season, peak direction capacity; or 2. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is proposed and if. a. At the time a development order or permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are in place or under construction; or b. A development order or permit is issued subject to a condition that the facility expansion needed to serve the new development is included in the county's adopted five-year schedule of capital improvements and is scheduled to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent. The schedule of capital improvements may recognize and include transportation projects included in the first three years of the adopted Florida Department of Transportation five year work program. In order to apply this provision to a facility expansion project, the Capital Improvements Element must include the following policies: Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Pee • 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- n,z 45 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element i. The estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. ii. A provision that a plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any road or mass transit facility or service which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year schedule of capital improvements (for Indian River County, this is included in Policy 1.2 of this Element); or 3. The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is the subject of a binding executed agreement which requires the facility to be in place or under actual construction no more than three years after the issuance of the project's first building permit or its functional equivalent; or 4. 'The segment's new roadway capacity if, at the time a development order or permit is issued, the facility is guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, to be in place or under actual construction not more than three years after issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent. The segment's new roadway capacity if facility expansion for the segment is the subject of a proportionate fair -share agreement. In such case, the segment capacity increase reflected in the proportionate fair share agreement shall be available only to the party or parties to the proportionate fair share agreement. ➢ For school facilities: A residential development order or permit shall be issued only if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available in one or more contiguous service areas. Regulation No development order shall be issued for any project where the project's demand in conjunction with existing demand and committed demand will exceed the capacity of a facility at the service level established in this plan. Level -of -service analysis will be undertaken during the review of each project for which development order approval is required. Monitoring System To effectively implement the concurrency requirement, it is necessary to maintain an estimate of available capacity for each public facility subject to level -of -service requirements. By maintaining an accurate and current available capacity estimate for each facility, projected demand from development applications can be compared to the available capacity for the facility to determine if the project can Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -Qe �_ . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015-61 46 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element be approved. The purpose of the monitoring program is to maintain a current estimate of available capacity for each facility. With the exception of public schools, the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan is maintained by the county's planning division. Effective July 1, 2008, the School District initiated and now maintains the monitoring system portion of the concurrency management plan for public schools. Using a network computer system and database management software, records were developed and are maintained for each specific facility. Based upon information in the specific comprehensive plan elements, total capacity figures for each applicable facility are maintained in database files established for each public facility category. Capacity figures are modified as facilities are expanded or as criteria specified in the availability of capacity section are met, thereby allowing a programmed expansion to be considered for capacity determination purposes. Through contact with other county departments, planning staff are able to modify capacity estimates as soon as facility characteristics are changed. Table 6.17 depicts the general structure of the monitoring system database file for each public facility category. That table shows that available capacity for each specific facility is a function of total capacity less existing demand and less committed demand. The demand section of this concurrency management plan identifies the methodology for assessing demand. Tabic 6.17: Monft6 in 5 stems Desi n rX Public Facility Specific ° , Total Capacity Existing Demand Committed Tiemand[1ble Caacti' Category Facilities Peak season/ peak Annual count (average) Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Traffic Roadways direction/ peak hour (peak season/peak approved Development Demand) - (Committed Demand) (LOS D) direction/peak hour) Orders (DO) Sanitary Treatment Design flows Existing flows Volume estimated from approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) Sewer Plants Treatment Volume estimated from (Total Capacity) - (Existing Potable Water Plants Design flows Existing flows approved DO's Demand) - (Committed Demand) Solid Waste Landfill Active cell design Active cell volume used Volume estimated from approved DO's (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) capacity (Acres per thousand (Acres per thousand population) X (projected (Total Capacity) - (Existing Recreation Parks Park Acreage population) X (existing population for approved Demand) - (Committed Demand) population) DO's) Drainage Drainage Volume Existing flows Volume of stormwater allowed to outfall for (Total Capacity) - (Existing Demand) - (Committed Demand) conveyances approved DO's Public Permanent Student Annual Enrollment Students estimated from approved residential aci (Existing (Total Capacity) ty) - ( g Education Schools(K-12) Stations (FISH) Count (FTE) Development Orders) Demand) - (Committed Demand) Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted n--- 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- oil 47 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element To implement the monitoring system, the following actions shown in table 6.18 will be necessary. Table 6.18: M601i rmg System', asks Action ResponsibteH,epertmcnt tr�Ea"Ik .:1Ytpiag Do quarterly traffic counts for thoroughfare plan roads to determine existing demand Engineering Annually Compile quarterly ridership statistics for all fixed routes MPO Annually Identify existing flows for each water and sewer treatment plant Utilities Annually Estimate Landfill (active cell) volume used Utilities Annually Estimate population and apply park standard to determine park existing demand Planning Annually Estimate existing flows for drainage conveyances Engineering Annually Enter data received from other departments into computer Planning Ongoing Do annual student counts (FTE) for public schools to determine existing demand School District Annually Add estimated demand for new projects to committed demand total upon issuance of DO Planning Ongoing Maintain records of units/projects receiving a certificate of occupancy, maintain demand estimates from those units/projects, subtract estimated demand for those units/projects for committed demand once existing demand is updated Planning Ongoing Applicability The concurrency management plan monitoring system has applicability to more than just level -of - service measurement. It also provides the basis for assessing facility expansion needs and therefore capital improvements programming. By maintaining an accurate and up-to-date estimate of available capacity, the need for facility expansion can be recognized before all capacity is used. By incorporating the monitoring system into the capital improvements programming process, capital budgets can be prepared based on reliable information and valid estimates of need. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted r,;e_cenWe(- 12015, Ordinance 2015- 011 48 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Goal, Obiectives and Policies Goal It is the goal of Indian River County to provide needed capital improvements through the use of sound fiscal decision making. Objectives and Policies Objective 1: Construction of Capital Facilities By 2020, the county will have completed those capital improvements schedule projects that replace obsolete or worn-out facilities, eliminate existing deficiencies or accommodate desired future growth. Policy 1.1: The county shall maintain a five-year capital improvement program and pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F. S. evaluate and update that program every year to reflect existing and future public facility needs of the county. This capital improvement program will ensure that the plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standards are achieved and maintained. Policy 1.2: The county and the School District shall undertake only those capital improvements included within this element's adopted capital improvements program. Pursuant to Section 163.3177(3)(b) F.S., the Capital Improvements Element will be reviewed every year. If any facility identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements is delayed or deferred in construction, or is eliminated from the capital improvements program, and this delay, deferal, or elimination will cause the level -of -service to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level of service standard for the facility, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to adjust the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The annual update of the capital improvement element shall be done with a single public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and a copy of the ordinance amending the Capital Improvements Element shall be transmitted to DEO. Polio: The county shall evaluate and prioritize its capital improvement projects based on following criteria. These criteria are ranked in order of importance. ➢ Preservation of the health and safety of the public by eliminating public hazards; ➢ Compliance with all mandates and prior commitments; ➢ Elimination of existing deficiencies; ➢ Maintenance of adopted level -of -service standards; ➢ Provision of infrastructure concurrent with the impact of new development; ➢ Protection of prior infrastructure investments; ➢ Consistency with the county plan and plans of other agencies; ➢ Accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility demands; ➢ Consistency with plans of state agencies and water management districts that provide public facilities within the local government's jurisdiction; Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Tec . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015 - oil 49 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ Promotion of compact development by discouraging growth outside of urban service areas; ➢ Demonstration of linkages between projected growth and facility location; ➢ Utilization of the economies of scale and timing of other improvements; ➢ Reduction of operating costs; ➢ Adjustment for unseen opportunities, situations, and disasters. Polio: The county shall implement the policies of the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Solid Waste sub -elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Since these are enterprise account funded elements, capital expenditures identified in these elements shall be funded principally from revenues derived from the applicable systems. Policy 1.5: The county shall prioritize and implement the programs identified in the Transportation, Recreation and Open Space, Stormwater Management, Conservation, and Future Land Use Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.6: The county shall not eliminate or reallocate budgeted appropriations for road improvement projects required to meet the adopted level -of -service standards unless the applicable projects will be constructed by other means and remain concurrent with the county's Schedule of Capital Improvements. Policy 1.7: The county shall continue to allocate funds for the replacement and the renewal of infrastructure in an amount which will minimize the operating costs of the infrastructure and maximize the life of the infrastructure. Policy 1.8: The county shall manage its long-term general obligation debt in such a manner that the ratio of the debt service millage to the countywide operating millage does not exceed 20%. Policy l_9: The county hereby defines a capital improvement as an improvement with a cost that exceeds $100,000. Policy 1.10: The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall contain a mix of capital expenditures, including projects to eliminate existing deficiencies, to upgrade and replace existing facilities, and to construct new facilities. Policy 1.11: The county shall maintain a procedure in its annual budget review requiring each county department to include in its annual budget request applicable expenditures as identified in the capital improvements program of the appropriate Comprehensive Plan Element as well as department's capital improvements. Policy 1.12: The county hereby adopts the 2015 — 2015 through 2019 - 2020 Indian River County School District Five -Year Facilities Work Plan. The Indian River County School District Five -Year Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Dec- 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- Oil 50 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Facilities Work Plan will be evaluated and updated annually to reflect existing and future public school facility needs of the county. This will ensure that the Indian River County School District Five -Year Facilities Work Plan is financially feasible and that the adopted level -of -service standard for public schools is achieved and maintained. Objective 2: Development in Coastal Hiah Hazard Areas Through 2030, development in coastal high hazard areas will not increase beyond the density or intensity levels indicated on the current Future Land Use Map. Policy 2.1: The coastal high hazard area is defined as the area of the county designated as evacuation zones for a category one hurricane. Policy 2.2: The county shall not increase land use density and intensity, in the coastal high hazard area, beyond that reflected in the county's current Future Land Use Map. Policy 2_3: The county shall make appropriations for infrastructure in coastal high hazard areas only to maintain the adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 2.4: The county shall ensure that the replacement of infrastructure in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to maintaining the adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 2.5: The county shall require that all developments and all single-family units in coastal high hazard areas fully pay the cost for required infrastructure improvements through impact fees, capacity charges, developer dedications, assessments, and contributions. Policy 2.6: The county shall not use public funds to subsidize increased density or intensity of urban development in coastal high hazard areas; however, public beach, shoreline access, resource restoration, or similar projects may be constructed. Objective 3: Maintenance of Established Level -of -Service Standards Through 2030, adopted levels -of -service will be maintained for all concurrency facilities. Policy 3.1: The county hereby adopts the concurrency management system as described within this element. The county shall maintain Land Development Regulation (LDR) Chapter 910, Concurrency Management System, which implements the plan's concurrency management system. In accordance with the concurrency management system of this plan and LDR Ch. 910, the county will not approve any development project where the impacts of such a project would lower the existing level -of -service on any facility below that facility's adopted minimum level -of -service standard. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted T« • 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- o i 7 51 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Policy 3.2: The county shall approve development only in accordance with the utility connection matrix identified in the Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water Sub -Elements. Policy 3.3: The county shall, concurrent with the impact of new development, provide the infrastructure necessary to maintain the levels -of -service identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Where development is proposed and is consistent with all applicable regulations but one or more public facilities is/are operating at an inadequate service level, the applicant may at his expense make facility improvements to increase facility capacity when such improvements are consistent with county plans and receive county approval. Policy 3.4: The county shall make land use decisions based on the planned availability of facilities to maintain adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 3.5: The county hereby adopts Concurrency Management level -of -service standards for public facilities that are established in the other Comprehensive Plan Elements and which are stated below: ➢ Stormwater Mana e The county hereby adopts the following level -of -service standard for all new drainage systems within the unincorporated county: ➢ New development requiring major site plan approval or subdivision platting shall construct a complete drainage system to mitigate the impacts of a 25 year/24 hour design rainfall event using the soil conservation service type 2 modified rainfall curves. ➢ Post development runoff for any drainage basin shall not exceed pre -development runoff unless a maximum discharge rate has been adopted and the discharge does not exceed that rate. If a maximum discharge rate has not been adopted for a basin, post development discharge may not exceed pre -development discharge. By 2020, all existing roadways in the county shall be improved to meet the following level -of -service standards: ➢ Minimum road crown elevation for existing roads shall be raised during resurfacing/rebuilding to the flood elevation resulting from the 2 year/24 hour storm event on local streets. ➢ The center two lanes of rebuilt roads must be at or above flood levels resulting from a 10 year 24 hour storm event on Arterial and Collector roads. ➢ All drainage basins will meet the following level of service standard: 10-Year/24 Hour Storm Event The county hereby adopts the following water quality level -of -service standard: Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted Dec • I , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 11 52 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ As a minimum, retention of the first one inch of rainfall is required prior to offsite discharge. An additional 50% treatment is required for all direct discharge into the Sebastian River and into the Indian River Lagoon due to its designation as an outstanding Florida water, as required by state law. ➢ Potable Water The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's potable water facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit. ➢ Solid Waste The following level -of -service standard is adopted for solid waste facilities in the county, and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 2.2 tons or 3.67 cubic yards per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population per year. ➢ Sanitary Sewer The following level -of -service standard is adopted for the county's sanitary sewer facilities, and shall be utilized for determining the availability of facility capacity and demand generated by a development: ➢ Countywide level -of -service standard of 250 gallons per day per equivalent residential unit with a peak monthly flow factor of 1.25. ➢ Recreation & Open Space The county adopts the following recreation level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 6.61 recreation acres/ 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population. ➢ Transportation The county adopts traffic circulation level -of -service standards as follows: ➢ Level -of -Service "D" during peak hour, peak season, peak direction conditions, on all TRIP grant funded roads as well as all freeway, arterial, and collector roadways, with Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'Q ec . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 01T 53 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element the exception of the following two, which will operate at level of service "E" plus 20%. • 27`h Ave — South County Line to SR 60 • 43`d Ave — Oslo Road to 16th Street For SIS/Florida Intrastate Highway System roadways, level of service "B" is adopted for rural areas, and level of service "C" is adopted for urban areas. Polio The county hereby adopts level -of -service standards for selected public facilities as follows: ➢ Correctional Facilities The county adopts the following correctional facilities level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 4.5 beds/1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Fire/EMS The county adopts the following Fire/EMS level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide (excluding Indian River Shores) level -of -service standard of .089 Stations per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Law Enforcement The county adopts the following Law Enforcement level -of -service standard: ➢ Unincorporated County level -of -service standard of 2.09 officers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ Libraries The county adopts the following Libraries level -of -service standards: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 580 building square feet per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 3,200 library material items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.7 computers per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 0.2 other library equipment items per 1,000 permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'thee . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015--a4— 54 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element ➢ Public Buildings The county adopts the following Public Buildings level -of -service standard: ➢ County wide level -of -service standard of 1.99 building square feet per capita for permanent plus weighted peak seasonal population. ➢ Schools The county adopts the following Schools level -of -service standard: Schools (School Service Areas): ➢ 100 percent of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each public school type (elementary, middle, and high). ➢ Transit The County adopts the following transit level -of -service standard: ➢ One-hour headways shall be maintained on all fixed transit routes. Objective 4: Future Development's Share of Capital Costs Through 2030, new developments will bear a proportionate share of the cost required to maintain adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 4.1: The county shall use impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, developer dedications and contributions, to pay for infrastructure improvements and services needed to satisfy future needs while maintaining adopted level -of -service standards. Policy 4_2: The county shall conduct research to identify new sources of revenue for funding capital improvement projects. Obiective 5• Local Government's Ability to Provide Required Services and Facilities Through 2030, the county will ensure that it is able to fund and provide required services and facilities. Policy 5.1: The county shall not approve land use amendment requests unless those requests are consistent with the concurrency management system requirements of this element. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted 'pec • 1 2015, Ordinance 2015- Oil 55 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Policy 5.2: In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the county shall schedule capital improvements to serve developments in the following order of priority: ➢ Single-family units in existing platted subdivisions or on existing legal, buildable parcels ➢ Affordable housing projects ➢ New development orders permitting redevelopment ➢ New development orders permitting new developments where the applicant funds the infrastructure expansion in exchange for future reimbursement ➢ New development orders permitting new developments without developer participation Policy 5_3: The county shall extend facilities and services to serve areas only within the existing Urban Service Area or as allowed by Policy 5.7 of the Potable Water Sub -Element and Policy 5.8 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 5.4: The county shall coordinate with other local, state, and federal agencies as well as private entities to create an efficient capital improvements schedule that provides the following general benefits while minimizing the financial burden of providing facilities and services: ➢ Reduction of overall capital and operating expenditures by the development of multi -use facilities; ➢ More efficient land use patterns and phasing; ➢ Reduction of overlapping, duplicating, and administrative procedures; ➢ Implementation of adopted physical, social, and economic goals and policies in a least -cost manner; ➢ Better coordination of public capital investment with private capital expenditures. Policy 5.5: The county shall continue utilizing enterprise funds for the provision of Sanitary Sewer, Potable Water, and Solid Waste facilities. The debt for enterprise funds is to be paid by user fees, capacity charges, and other appropriate sources. Policy 5.6: The county shall finance the capital cost of non -enterprise fund supported public facilities (e.g., roads, stormwater management, and parks) from current revenue, bond issues, impact fees, capacity charges, assessments, and other appropriate sources. Policy 5.7: The county shall use general obligation bonds and other sources to raise the funding required to provide those public facilities that cannot be constructed with user fees, revenue bonds, impact fees, capacity charges, or other dedicated revenue sources. Policy 5.8: Developments, which require public facility infrastructure improvements that will be financed by county debt, shall have their development orders conditioned on the issuance of the county debt or the substitution of a comparable amount of non -debt revenue. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted —O(f c . / , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 17 56 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Policy 5.9: Pursuant to state law, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance and not deemed to be an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan when the amendment relates to corrections, updates, or modifications concerning costs, revenue sources, acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, or the date of construction of any facility except transportation facilities enumerated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. For transportation facilities, a delay in construction of a facility which causes the level -of -service of that facility to deteriorate below the adopted minimum level -of -service standard for the roadway will require a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy 5.1 O: The county shall ensure that all capital improvements identified in the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan are completed according to schedule. The only acceptable delays will be those which are subject to one of the following: ➢ Projects providing capacity equal to, or greater than, the delayed project are accelerated within or added to the Schedule of Capital Improvements; ➢ Modification of development orders issued conditionally or subject to the concurrent availability of public facility capacity provided by the delayed project. Such modification shall restrict the allowable amount and schedule of development to that which can be served by the capacity of public facilities according to the revised schedule; or ➢ Amendment of the plan to reduce the adopted standard for the level -of -service for public facilities until the fiscal year in which the delayed project is scheduled to be completed. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted ' e- c . t , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 11 57 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Implementation, Evaluation, and Monitoring Implementation An important part of any plan is its implementation. Implementation involves execution of the plan's policies. It involves taking actions and achieving results. For the Capital Improvements Element, implementation involves various activities. While some of these actions will be ongoing, others are activities that will be taken by certain points in time. For each policy in this element, table 6.20 identifies the type of action required, the responsible entity for taking the action, the timing, and whether or not the policy necessitates a capital expenditure. To implement the Capital Improvements Element, several different types of actions must be taken. These include: development of mechanisms for funding new facilities, adoption of land development regulations and ordinances, execution of interlocal agreements, coordination, and preparation of studies and evaluation and monitoring reports. Overall, the Capital Improvements Element implementation responsibility will rest with the Office of Management and Budget. Besides its responsibilities as identified in table 6.18, the planning department has the additional responsibility of ensuring that other entities discharge their responsibilities. This will entail notifying other applicable departments of capital expenditures to be included in their budgets, notifying other departments and groups of actions that must be taken, and assisting other departments and agencies in their plan implementation responsibilities. As part of the Capital Improvements Element, the county has developed a Concurrency Management Plan, which ensures the maintenance of the adopted level -of -service standards. Through the Concurrency Management Plan, the county will measure facility capacity, assess development demand, and maintain a Capital Improvements Program which ensures that the level -of -service standards are maintained. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted T e c • 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 011 58 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 6.192 Capital Improvemeant=Element Implementation Policy Type of Action Responsibility Timing .. CapitalLiwxpanditure 1.1 Maintain the CIP OMB/PD 2015-2020 No 1.2 Follow the CIP PD 2015-2020 No 1.3 Prioritize capital improvement projects OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 1.4 Implement recommendations Appropriate County Departments/SD 2015-2020 Yes 1.5 Prioritize and implement programs Appropriate County Departments/SD 2015-2020 Yes 1.6 Maintain previous commitments BCC/PWD/SD Ongoing No 1.7 Replacement and renewal of infrastructure Appropriate County Departments/SD Ongoing No 1.8 Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.9 Define capital improvement PD/OMB Ongoing No 1.10 Capital Budget Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 1.11 Capital Improvements Management OMB/SD Ongoing No 2.1 Define costal high hazard area DCA Ongoing No 2.2 Maintain density and intensity levels of current FLU Map PD Ongoing No 2.3 management Budget mana g g Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.4 Maintain LOS standards Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 2.5 Funding mechanisms BCC/Private Developers Ongoing No 2.6 Infrastructure replacement strategy Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 3.1 Maintain concurrency management system PD Ongoing No 3.2 Follow connection matrix of Comprehensive Plan Sub- Elements Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 3.3 Maintain adopted LOS standards PD Ongoing No 3.4 Land use decisions BCC Ongoing No 3.5 Adopt LOS standards BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 4.1 Impose regulations Appropriate County Departments Ongoing Yes 4.2 Conduct research OMB/PD Ongoing No Community Development Department Indian River County Adoptedye c ' 1 9 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 ►l 59 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element Table 649c Capital Improvement` entat3oa trtx "A Element Im lem77 Policy Type of Action Responsibility; �Thnwg" 0 p 1jr ddiire 4.3 Work with municipalities BCC/SD/Other Local Governments in IRC Ongoing No 5.1 Approve land use changes only if infrastructure can BCC Ongoing No support land use change 5.2 Prioritize capital improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 5.3 Extension of facilities and services BCC/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No Appropriate County 5.4 Create an efficient capital improvements schedule Departments/Other Ongoing No Government Agencies 5.5 Utilize enterprise funds OMB Ongoing No 5.6 Finance non -enterprise fund supported projects OMB Ongoing No 5.7 Fund the construction of public facilities OMB/SD Ongoing Yes 5.8 Permitting Requirements BCC/Appropriate County Departments Ongoing No 5.9 Amending the Schedule of Capital improvements BCC/OMB/PD/SD Ongoing No 5.10 Complete the Schedule of Capital Improvements BCC/SD/Appropriate County Departments 2020 No 5.11 Adopt a Priority Transportation Capital Improvements BCC/PWD/MPO Ongoing No Schedule BCC = Board of County Commissioners DCA = Department of Community Affairs FDOT = Florida Department of Transportation MPO = Metropolitan Planning Organization OMB = Office of Management and Budget PD = Planning Department PWD = Public Works Department SD = School District Evaluation and Monitoring Procedures To be effective, a plan must not only provide a means for implementation; it must also provide a mechanism for assessing the plan's effectiveness. Generally, a plan's effectiveness can be judged by the degree to which the plan's objectives have been met. Since objectives are structured, as much as possible, to be measurable and to have specific timeframes, the plan's objectives are the benchmarks used as a basis to evaluate the plan. Table 6.20 identifies each of the objectives of the Capital Improvements Element. It also identifies the measures to be used to evaluate progress in achieving these objectives. Most of these measures are quantitative, such as adopting land development requirements, which ensure the maintenance of Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted .V e c . ' , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 01 60 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element the level -of -service standards, adopting a capacity monitoring system and others. Besides the measures, table 6.20 also identifies timeframes associated with meeting the objectives. The Planning Department staff will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating the Capital Improvement Element. This will involve collection of data and compilation of information regarding facility capacity, expansion, and new development permitted. This will be done on a regular basis. As part of the county's Concurrency Management System, the Planning Department will continually monitor the facility capacity to ensure that level -of -service standards will be maintained. dile 630: Ca itat Im rovements Element E atuation,matrbc Objective Measure° I Existing deficiencies in county services and/or obsolete or worn-out facilities 2020 2 Land use density and intensity in Coastal High Hazard Area 2030 3 Level -of -service provided for county services 2030 4 Existence of appropriate Land Development Regulations 2030 5 Completion of the Schedule of Capital Improvements 2030 While monitoring will occur on a continual basis, formal evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will occur annually. The formal evaluation and appraisal of the entire Comprehensive Plan will occur every ten years (dependent upon the schedule adopted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs). Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process will also be used to determine whether the Capital Improvements Element objectives should be modified or expanded based on revisions to state statutes and changing conditions not identified and addressed as part of the annual CIE update. In this way, the monitoring and evaluation of the Capital Improvements Element will not only provide a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it will also provide a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element not otherwise addressed in the yearly update of the Capital Improvements Element. As discussed in the above paragraphs, the evaluation and monitoring procedures identified for the Capital Improvements Element are basically the same for the entire Comprehensive Plan. These procedures have been used in the past to prepare the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used by the county in subsequent Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. The monitoring and evaluation of this plan is critical to ensure that the policies are effective in achieving the plan's goals and objectives. Each individual element of the plan contains provisions and measures to be used in the review of the element. Each element contains an Implementation and Evaluation Matrix and monitoring procedures, which are currently being used to prepare the current Evaluation and Appraisal Report and will be used to prepare future Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Community Development Department Indian River County Adopted -De c . 1 , 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0 1 l 61 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element In addition, a great portion of the plan monitoring will be in conjunction with the concurrency management system which is designed to ensure that approved level -of -service standards are maintained and that sufficient capacity exists in the various services and facilities. Other evaluation of the plan or plan elements is likely to occur in the day to day application of the mandated regulations, which will result in plan amendments. The formal Evaluation and Appraisal Report required by law is currently providing and in subsequent versions will provide a complete review of the plan and be conducted in compliance with the public participation procedures adopted for the development of this plan. As part of the monitoring system, all appropriate baseline data is currently being updated and will be updated. Besides assessing progress, the evaluation and appraisal process is and will also be used to determine whether the objectives should be modified or expanded. In this way the monitoring and evaluation of the Comprehensive Plan Elements not only provides a means of determining the degree of success of the plan's implementation; it also provides a mechanism for evaluating needed changes to the plan element. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\CIE\2015\2015 Capital Improvements Element - Working Copy.doc Community Development Department Indian River County 62 Adopted -De- c • i , 2015, Ordinance 2015- C LIE ssMo� o�� 000MW� b N 49 69 N 69 N K M 69 69 6m F fio� 601)64 C� a N N 69 yrN W C> 64 o � a va a Ni N n 69 -i 69 M 69 K 6V9 669 69 O yrN W 609 609 pS 609 oo O 6x09 o 8 604 p p O ti O C00 N C ah O O N O �, 69 69 10h s rN W O Vi 8 O 44 O O 8 O 8 O .�.i 69 69 669 69 6s rO W .® v0i oho 609 O 609 1 8 n S 8 (C vi ^ Vi ? V1 ^ O Vl O h 00 00604 N M�. fA 69 69 69 61) rl iH N {t oQ� a � � FU t Y O y bR d L Q a + N N h h M N N^ M N M 7 h N N A A N A A A AAAA L1 V] T T u N T V] C/] V] 3 T U T U T V T U T U T 6) O�Fp 000 U O�Fq O O 0`OU W O�Fq NP b0`9 G O�Oq ,A C} O O O w w�� F�1w O ggQw w w w w w g gw 02525$0�� 5 S5FE��L o��Z5og�0000g o vi h vi h o c, o v o o c g o 0 0 O l, N l- N D\ D\ ' fA fA K 69 6A V3 N 63 69 V1 69 N N69 K 609 609 S O O O S O 609 609 60A 609 666 0 0 0 0 N fA nN -. 6A N 6A N 69 h 6A N 69 VOl^ .• 0�0 6- 69 A fA 69 O b°f O 69 o 6H O 69 O 69 pp 8 O 66 O 69 00 69 fA O 69 O 69 O 69 O O O fA O O Cvi O fA Q 8 y� 800 O 669 69 69 69 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 bA 0 69 0 CO 0 0 6A 64 69 O Vi Vi 6A O 69 O S O N fA vM1 69 7 69 l00' 69 ... 69 N M 69 69 8 Cn 0 fA !A O O O C 0 0 C N VN' -It O N O N M O 6A 60S 64 69 69 — l h 6A 69 fA 69 0Vf � 0 SO 609 (A 609 609 6019 S 8 609 609 609 f0A 609 O O p W O O M 6q Vf K C O O O '� O O O d p C J7 'a EO O t1 Q Q Q Q�_ tVtl N n O a 0 0 0 0 0«« E E Y 9 5 a ] n �"n`�'ov N ! bN cl)� �'A U6 V 6U X. iU P. TTA h La 6N9 Cl 69 00 69 I64 O N O 10 6A %n N N N O .�o O b � m w w l S' U Sig Og g0 o lc� v o $ o $ o N C O N 69 N N 69 7 Vf N &O i fA f.9 69 69 609 609 609 609 609 609 609 ir09 ... 69 69 69 69 69 fill, 41 69 69 69 iH K 69 69 69 69 __ f9 69 69 69 fA 69 69 69 A -_ O O 8cli lc pCp 8I� V O O O R O 69 N 69 N vi �p 69 69 69 69 Pa Oy0 OD A - +" C G Q O A 9 v aQi � o G g g U z zzH %n Mi Q 6) 0 6) 0 w w_gy w w F E E F E F q F F F r r g p g a M2 I O ywp S� 8a Sg 8O N-+ O O O l � O O S N o8 M fA M opO O 69 6A K 6�9 609 in K 6�9 419 64 6VA K 664 6�9 6�9 40% O O 6V9 6V9 669 K 669 K S 614 b�9 O 6169 O SS N 6A C N 6A o � 6A N 6e K O T O O O V NN O b O N 69 69 O O � �Q+ U a a 4 a ' c d � itl 8 0 o V V U U c a>> 7 V 7 V �nw.33 00. 0z 8'8'ap¢ aF� v°�w Q M M 7 R N M M i� I' o u v s t w w a°�i w a°�i w w avi w w w EMl�Dl 16155QS5�S]�� 0 00��25��25 N b 69 6fi fA (A 69 " 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O " Ni V3 69 f9 fA fA 69 4f fA 69 O O C O C O f O 69 O K 7 N 69 p S QS O 609 609 K 609 p 0 609 i0A pp S 609 HfiqK 4 O p pp O� 69 O 69 60�a9 N 69 i OO O O O Vf O 69 O 0O C00 O 69 O 'RfA O O 64 O O CO O 69 O 61% Cl 69 O 69 - O v01 N 69 fA 6Y :,609 Op O O 60> C 609 O M O O h S n �_ 000 O N vl N N l� N 69 V4 6'f 69 elf 69 69 V+ K K f41 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 8 C O C O S S OC h O O ^ C C "A N ONO 649 N M .N+ " O� M H K 69 &.4 Vi 69 69 f9 f l) 69V% (A a>" r+ n CA N u U U o 9 V cn 0 0 d 3zza :R wU�v00$ U ca 0- 1 N ti Nl H H N N E w wyy w w N N N N C C C C V1 yNy C> 0 v V pV O fA 69 69 69 609 609 O 609 O O O O n O n O C 69 iH O 69 O 69 O 69 O 69 O 69 O 69 O 69 O 69 O ifi O 69 O 609 K 609 8 O h O Vt 6 64 C V9 f0A O0 O 69 O O 8 7 O 7 K N 6f9 6�9 t w m 6) � O y d 4) C N d U c O o O d U00 � o y � U U 'w U .. E c is `^ Usa U W w ca 0- 1 d f6 a N 7 M t i z zzz a i �j. � F c u u Fl- � 0 C Q 3 OQ, 0 Opp,, - C7 0 O �n O O Or O 0 o � 2pp5 o g n n g o o 0 0 0 o o n n 0 69 O R Vii O N 69 n -- 69 a 6A 000 N 69 fA N O fA H r� 10 6A 66 409 O 609 K 40A 609 409 609 0 NN C-4 69 S 69 P 3' 0 609 609 80 8 609 6q 609 609 609 vi N fn 00 vi M1 p fA O 609 V4 69 fA 44 O - pO O K d O O K pO S f0A 609 609 H 609 609 609 K O O CCC O 6A O 0 fA - 609 O O 609 409 10 S 8 O OO O C C h Vi .�- FA 6A N 69 N 69 Q fA M 69 O a v y �c h 'O C N G C cCtl C y 00 D ° C G U v N a y a y u s „ „ v N to N g °Ij N N a v? a 5V) in•S� v�•� = av) PUrfn in. F d f6 a t O� a0 rNp N_ N 7 M `rD app ^ p T � O O� r W N 00 M R H 00 N N N �Op r Vi W � K y Vf 6�9 6N9 Vf 69 Vf 8 88 Ory VI 64 f9 N V 0 0 0 VN1 O �/1 N K O py T �t fA rl K H ,� y� Vf V! N N h O� 88 N O �O�pp� C O N ppppb� O T CN �G O` O� 7 V H N1 V-4 V N Vi w Ol 88888869 O 10 O OoO M N 69 pO r 8 N ll N 69 69 pOp 0 1 ' � N 69 N pMp�� 0 . aD .+ K M Or (A r M 69 -. o0 o0oro 0vi pp � S pry K N GN9 � Wim. 69 M 69 M Vi a U L: U 00 Q O C O C O C a a z z z o q c � eq14 1 W F88y8888 O HH Ga H G09 K N N po vi K 8F 8 O O O O 888888 0 0 8�8 O O OO Op O O y 0 If ? 00 Op O O g O J2 lC5 g g Vl �Vp1 p0 O OV�pl Vel 4A Vel M (A 7 8 O O� vl M h O �R�{{ Vf K fn vt f/f h H b3 K K VI K 6N9 K 69 O O O O O8 SO K K O 8O O ya�pp O O O O 8 � h cNs h w C O O O O C O O yNy �N{ W W Vf N N r O ge R OG 00 8 VOl Vi !A Vf H Vf 6A (A fA W Vf (A M H 69 fA H L W O C e0 O C a0 C C W O C aJ O O O C A O C A O Y Z C C C C= C VJ G C •C 1. C p i C C L C C C G U U V C U V x v x E E u ec e w w w w w e n � v U o �•. �O, o r0p, o o � � O Z u v t v � v � v u b 3 b b b b b � •'�_- � a I MMM=== „© 5 5 A A w gow �a ti g Ga ti F ti W � I MMM=== „© 5 5 A A ti ti F ti W � F o F m m o � z ��8 A F 8�8N88 p p V�1 O 8 88 nO P N 8F n H O h HO K 8 ��a+f O r r101n PI10 C, H N mmmm; o ffi T H ti ti ti � F o F u u ffi o z ��8 Fp V 8�8N88 p p V�1 O N aap 8 8 8 ��a+f O 8 T H ��OO��Opppp 8O Off} N N N Vf 8O 8O pM� O fA N 8O O H y �O tV H H y H H H u NH O H H H T H H 0 'J■■.■ E u u ffi 6 �+ ffi v v v 3 a u � c I's 2 o ti 'A 14 > a o, c c vi ti m o ,. o U u y Do p 5 14 N e i e ffi F ti OC 0.' PL Q Q Q Q Q Q y H y fh t� V�1 •p 'O b 'O 'O 'O C � i i .PJ' v e e v a v a s e a a v H 0 'J■■.■ E zInt. J = R r a H a z a I Ia = LOD N a r p L C O OS5 C U C L = o y x ce u u u u 0 S S 4 � 5 C A u 5 0 C ellQ �5 v o E � v� � C tdd W o h �, Vl .aMSr h ggiO 'O c h r M 0 �25`" 25""'25 oo�gpi w�o2p5"� 2p52p5"'H zInt. J = R r a H a z a I Ia = LOD N a r p L C O OS5 C U C L = o y x ce u u u 0 S S 4 � 5 C A u 5 0 C ellQ �5 v o E � v� � C tdd W h �, Vl .aMSr h ggiO 'O h r M 0 �25`" 25""'25 oo�gpi w�o2p5"� 2p52p5"'H 25`'"25 �o`�opm�25rn � 0) ti ol H H H H H H H R J = R O T O H LOC C = LOD N p L C O OS5 C U C L = o y x ce u u u 0 S S 4 � 5 C A u 5 0 C ellQ �5 v o E � v� � C tdd W h �, Vl .aMSr h ggiO 'O h r M 0 10 r Q H p L C U L C U C L = o y ce u u u S S 4 o C A u u u C ellQ " D E p C tdd W h �, Vl .aMSr h ggiO 6� 0 10 in 0) ti Al b w y b, c=7 u ti v ti� a> a>�a>5 r Q e � \ \§ ` kk \! § > ! ® ) } > !§§ / � ; 2 § f li § ) Or \} /{ ! \ k J / } } c k mi 2 /2 ƒ 2 k §( $ $ ± b ) ] § \ \§ ` kk \! § > ! ® ) } > !§§ / � ; ; f li Or \} /{ ! k j c k 2 ƒ 2 k §( $ $ ± b ) ] J m■& §! \! a§\ !§§ \} /{ ! ! \ � 2 ƒ 2 ° ] § f }# } § \ d \ ) §! \! a§\ !§§ \} /{ k \ a \ / r E v W �, d E d 0 a E 'a as U G Ow .y Z d a E U v m rn m a r 0 0 N cai d O a+ N �1 4 O a U Q u LO Q m rn m CL l 'DR O O N_ 0 0 0 0 0 O O �n vi O �n 0 0� 00 O N O O O [� M M B O O O O Itr. 'n O O O O O C �o --. O O a\ to t- O� O O w 00 O O O O w O\ C tl O O vn N O O O C O O O� O O 'O O O\ O O t` r, vi Oi N O` vi O� O vp O C n vn vn O N M N O rw v1 00 o0 'o N R M vl O M M �o 00 N O ,2-'t IT o0 '•+ N O t� N rw of --� 7 �n ON 00 00 vi t- N �D F N (3, r. N Vi 6s 69 69 69 69 e4 69 I 69 6's I 49 v, 1 6%1'.4 v, I i^ I Hi 69 69 69 69 f/j &4 6H 69 69 69 69 OO O O O O C. O O O 1-D N �n O C N O O O O _M oo O O O O O O O C O C O O O O O+ 00 00 In H O, O O O O O O O N �n ON -i t-- �o 00 N O 00 M M O N N t� N N N N EA 69 f^ 69 6s "4 fr'f 64 69 65 I 69 I i^ I 1^ 1 69 G^ I fmi 1 64 6s 1 69 e4 fA 1 69 1 69 69 I 69 I v9 I 69 I fI9 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q+ ti O O O O O vi O C O O � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �G Yl t` O N 00 O O O O O O O 00 � O � Q+ N .-• l� M �D � h � N N V 10 1000 O v1 O N O O H �R Iq h N 00 N N O> w 69 &4 69 69 61) 69 614 69 1 6'i V4 &4 69 69 I 69 69 1 6.4 1 6A 69 6'f &416N 69 69 69 69 Ni 69 to O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O 't O O O M O O In O O O O 0 0 Rr O O 00 O O O b ON C �n O In N r- O O O O O O O O O O O O r - O Q\ O O N N N 00 O w7 V'i O V1 O M Clt C � M rA 69 69 69 ffi V4 64 &4 69 6H 6A 6'f I 9 64 6Y 69 69 69 fA 69 6'i 6Y 69 69 61 69 69 69 O O O O O O O O O O O t' - O O O O vl Ni 00 N O �n �o vi O O O O O O O O O O O o0 O N O O n O N t.- O 'n O vi yl N �D Q\ M 00 Q\ v' h N N rl ~ O D M N fG N M &4 &S 69 69 fsi 69 1 &4 69 6s 69 69 Vi 69 1 64 69 69 1 69 1 69 69 6H 6'i 1 69 1 6e 69 1 609 t!i 69 69 1.0 'Ir t- 1 O O O t- Cl O N vn O 61 0 0", 00 O N O M_ en 00 00 00 O00 O en t- as O O 00 o0 O O O C 00 O v1 O O O ON 00M_ In o0 O 00 n vi w N 'Ir kA O vi O O n to kn O M 00 _ M vi In M � t` Rt h r- vi N 7 O O rw 00 C v1 00 j" 6e 69 69 ffi 64 69 69 69 fA fA 69 'A 69 6H 65 69 69 69 69 (A G^ 69 69 69 f/i 6'f 64 69 3 a wo G b U ^ p N f a N U f/i N nr ►moi N lu z� U y clu G' y S r r ^ N yd w r° c E A ��+ w w 67 GJ v i H a w wcr a -14y ao rv: C Ca C� F" w to p 'O .o p :p U °� � � � W O d p 'ami o o � x � � � e`d d o � a c �� � >• a $ °' vi H F a a io 3 is 3 is 3 P4 oa U C� La w w w C7 C7 C7 C7 w a to in cn E= > F LO Q m rn m CL l A L U N:: rl �.. H M 00 00 Q\ 00 00 N N vi n s9 sus H 00 In 00 vri O QN Cq r" r -z cq N` N N N H nn N N E' N p 8 N v0ii o�0 In N 00 Q Op N 69 w.l N fi3 69 .t 9 w c71 N C C N 10 et `, C6 o o o +• o S ,o 0 0 0 0 o o C c c a c a K c = H A W R c 0 _ 00 .cn r s s Ccq O U b e ; t U O `_(a' CI7 Q E ti: N 72 .�: .iCd cCdp E E M OO �rL O h V : C/1 y 'd w C C -49 dz r •G D` O O O L Cn Cn .0 CV .0 •d cd Gni y 0 C C 00 � N v� a .:U FP U v o 1 C�4 00 0 o 0 N, � v O > a' M a � 00 o ¢ 00 M U L t t ¢ M 'O D � N M o � v .9 .b p O O M 'n � 69 6A try O D 6 O O 60) N o 1 C�4 o 0 N, � v O > a' M a � 00 o ¢ 00 M U L t t ¢ 00 'O D O N o � v .9 .b p 00 O M 69 � 69 6A try O D O O N 69 00 6oq N N O N � ' N ti O N � W O 69 4A O O O O O O Ip $ 'j'„ O C O K O C O C O K � C C C � C ❑ C c'1 s*1 � '� O 'O O Im � U C: •� U � Q � O � � � r E� O a O .-1 nl N U oC Wo o vii o 0 0' Ja c 0 0 0 0 ., W, In O L O FLcd U 0 CY. U CG U G} �' Zo �n •C M •d M d �' �-+ V :M CC .O-� i 1 � v O > a' � 00 o ¢ U L t t ¢ 00 'O t o � v .9 .b a py 3 t0 y c~d U O U N y b C U ° c O q V~5 o' � q w z a � U U q - N z � o w. � w � o � N ° c = 3 U � U U O O (Ztl 3 q � a cd w_ 4 L N N Q O d o 2 E p N N z C �=gyp o N O O \J b a U � a U 0 fi99 1`�" O O O Mkn 00 O 00 N 6�9 Ell, ^ 69 69 A� o ao vag, C 0 �+ w w w w W w _ V] p s o d Q > N An y t- 00 00 y k ? (% o0 lu Q •. •. s u s s �� F � a 0o 0 ''n' a r- �n 'n .m+l 0000 a py t0 y c~d U O U N y b C U ° c O q � � q w z a � U U q - N z � o � w � o � N ° c = 3 U � U U O O (Ztl 3 q � a cd w_ 4 L N N Q O d o 2 E p N N z C o N O O \J b a U a U 0 W A W x z W � 0 04 PLO 0 ^L- 0* CL. H � w 4D U E 0 O Q a E z � w� o � H CU �I E A O =3 U MF ch T a N N N N m CDWCM co I tag n: � s^ O id -r 9 N A sto s § MP o a o 0 0 o c 1pta� e C4 CSD 01 O N � F r." 11 O V1 MW • j(D Q¢ S QQ p QQ QQ p t S Cpl Q c e 25 Z5 �o'r! Qy p O a"d c'S , v CD � i a N tV r V 9 I • r T- �pp� Qp pp pp S Q/ O O O Oco p p �y p�p f(f fA r" pp y p N Q r Ir O {if rt q- V f Cb o Cl uf uf C.) N s r g 8 8 S Q N �rS e� � �� � �' � •�i � �� '+ r � �' th `�- m r- C`1 r ,.� N "O O O O O O O O O O O O C:j;O O e 00 Ole EOle O a��S� 4u,8Soo3ot�.rl� pfd �g c?ct,4.. 25 ,C, ui I., wi _ C� � � •� co V) 4m g M � 8vi �!i a� i aO� g e75 g iii � �i $ � � v � Md ri M k i I Y w C 1 eG 0. 3 Q U�O spy Cc Pi w val, g �7 �° t G ' C p Iuj Z O �2q5€ jai •� w > 3 c . X 10' x a # uzi t� US. �L a a �n LA A Comprehensive Plan INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Local 1.50 Mill Expenditure For Maintenance, Repair and Renovation Anticipated expenditures expected from local fundng sources over the years covered by the current work plan. Capital Improvements Element 2015 - 2016 Work Plan Remaining Maintand Repair From 1.5Mills 53,684,231 52,702,028 $3,013,241 $4,580,997 $3,745,810 $17,735,276 Maintenance/RepairSalaries $3,300.000 53,550.000 $3.550,000 $3.550.000 $3.550.000 $17,500,000 School Bus Pumhases $900,000 $1,000.000 $1,000,000 $1,000.000 $1.000.000 $4,900,000 Other Vehicle Purchases $0 s0 $0 $0 so $0 Capital Outlay Equipment $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 SO Rent/Lease Payments $45.000 $0 $o so $0 $45.000 COP Debt Service $8.944.478 $8.945,414 $8.950.774 $8,947,549 $8,950,994 544,739,207 RentlLease Rebratabtes $888,811 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 54,88$811 Environmental Problems so s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 s.1011.14 Debt Service so so $0 So 30 SQ Special Facilities Construction Acocurit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Premiums for Property Casualty bhstrance - 1011.71 (4a,b) so so so so $0 $0 Oualified School Construction Bonds (QSCB) $1,307,447 $1,312,447 $1,312447 $1,312,447 $1,312,447 $8,557,235 Qualified Zone Academy Bands (QZAB) $0 30 so $0 30 s0 State Charter School Capital Outlay 5840,8 $840,889 5840,889 5840889 $840,889 $4.234.445 DistrictwWe Technology $500,000 5500.000 $500.000 $500.000 5500.000 32,500.000 LocalEspentib"Totals- $2A,416,85d $19,896,778 $20173,314 $21,746,882 $20,906,146 $•103,099,974 Revenue 1.50 Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Ca4"Outlay Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for eupenolhires an the projects included in the tentative district faciities work program. AN amounts are NET after considering earryaver balances, interest earned, new COP's, 1011.14 and 1011.15 loans, etc. Districts cannot use 1.5 -Mill furids for salaries except for those explicitly associated with mclrrlenanaehepair projects. (1011.71 (5}. F.&) Page 4 of ib Community Development Department Adopted December _L, 2015, Ordinance 2015 -moi W211WIF) 8 8:49 AM Page D-2 Comprehensive Plan INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Capital Improvements Element 2015 - 2016 Work Plan PECO Revenue Source The figure in the row designated `PECO Maintenance' wig be stdtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot be used for new construction. CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. Fair Share Revenue Source All legally bidding conrrruitrnerxs for proportionate fair -share mitigation for impacts on public sctod favi &es must be included in the 5 -year district work program. Nothing repos ted for this section. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific, infennation about any referendum for a t rent of %-eent surtax referendum ging the previous year_ Did the school district fold a surtax referendum daring the past fiscal year 2014 - 2015? No Additional Revenue Source Arty additional revenue sources Proceeds from a s.1011.14115 F.S. Lames iu au au District Bonds - Voted local band $0 $0 m i0 50 $0 referendum proceeds per s.6. Art Vlt State Constitution Proceeds from Special Act Borg m so 30 so 30 m Page 5 of 18 Community Development Department Adopted December _, 2015, Ordinance 2015-� W28M15 8:28:46 AM Page D-3 7711!7r" wa aP � ♦ 1 ® ♦ 1 ® ♦ 1 :1w Y CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. Fair Share Revenue Source All legally bidding conrrruitrnerxs for proportionate fair -share mitigation for impacts on public sctod favi &es must be included in the 5 -year district work program. Nothing repos ted for this section. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific, infennation about any referendum for a t rent of %-eent surtax referendum ging the previous year_ Did the school district fold a surtax referendum daring the past fiscal year 2014 - 2015? No Additional Revenue Source Arty additional revenue sources Proceeds from a s.1011.14115 F.S. Lames iu au au District Bonds - Voted local band $0 $0 m i0 50 $0 referendum proceeds per s.6. Art Vlt State Constitution Proceeds from Special Act Borg m so 30 so 30 m Page 5 of 18 Community Development Department Adopted December _, 2015, Ordinance 2015-� W28M15 8:28:46 AM Page D-3 Comprehensive Plan INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT Capital Improvements Element 2015 - 2016 Work Plan Estimated Revenue from CO S DSS Bond so $ri $0 $0 so $0 Sale • •. _ xl r. 1 e••• Proceeds from Voted Cap" $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Improvements milIW Other Revenue for Other Capital Projects $0 30 $0 $0 $0 $0 Proceeds from 112 cent sales surtax $0 30 30 $0 $0 $0 authorized by school hoard Proceeds from local governmental so $0 30 $o so $0 infrastructure sales surtax Proceeds from Cefifmrates of $0 so $0 $0 so $0 Participation (CUP's) Sate Classrooms First Bond proceeds amount $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 authorized in FY 1697-98 Classrooms for Kids $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 District Equity Recognition so so 30 so $o $0 Federal Grants so so $0 so so 30 Proportionate share nrtigabcn (actual so $0 $0 30 $0 $0 cash revenue only, not in kind donations) Impact fees received $o so $o so so $0 Private donations so $0 $o 30 so 30 Grants from local govertrnerts or nal -for- $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 Profit organizations Interest Including Profit On krvestment so so 30 $0 $0 $o Revenue from Bond pledging proceed $0 so 30 30 30 $0 from 1 cent or 112 cent Safes Surtax Total Fund Balance Carried Forward $1,451,400 $0 $o so $0 $1,451,400 General Capital Outlay Obligated Fund so so 30 so so so Balance Carried Forward From Trial Fund Balance Carried Forward Specht Facilities Construction Account $836.807 $835,807 $836.807 $835.807 383rM' $4.178A06 One Cent - V2 Cent Saks Surtax 04ebt $0 so 30 $0 30 $0 Service From Total Fund Balance Carried Forward Capital Outlay Projects Fads Balance $0 so 30 $0 $0 $0 Carried Forward From Total Fund Balance Carried Forward SubEota1 835.607 ff135,60T 835.687 835.687 55,619.935 Total Revenue Summary s ,a k } �� �� t i6 • •. _ xl r. 1 e••• Page 6 of 16 Community Development Department Adopted December __A_, 2015, Ordinance 2015 -_Ll 9128=15 82&Q AM Page D-4 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2015 - 2016 work Plan PECO Mainlenanoe Revenue $321,107 1321,107 1321.107 $321,107 $321.107 91,9€15.536 Avadabie1.50Miff for Mew Construction 11.768.119 $3.602A06 SC670,.296 $4.335A06 16.410.222 .20.786.139 CO g DS Revenue $111,087 $111,067 $111.887 $111.087 1111.987 1560.906 PECO New Construction Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 m m CW*dAdditmai Revenue $2,287.507 $635,807 $836.807 SM.907 $836.907 #5,929.935 Total Additional Revenue Total Available Revenue 12.396.494 !4167.613' $947,9911 54,590,000 1947.59: $3.617.M 1947.36! S5,4A3.000 194 _w $7,937,Ai6 16.189.670 $26,8761306 Project Schedules Capacity Project Schedules A schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of sa isfa, classrooms for the projected student enna8ment in K-12 programs. ..'-;i«... in Yq0'„'�, � _ K,+tiBWf Rv..',z* .�' to ynwx £ai>w+%�+o�.r, "ai A ... ti `r . t x+,.�eY .......'nw'S..b 10 $1oe,000 Y.'NA69"'Yux 1 17,275,613 ".i I i t 0 0 220 506 Total Classrwrns: 0 16 0 0 10 26 Cross Sq Ft: 0 21,000 0 0 12,000 33,000 DIP • ���� 111 1f1 _ Planned Cost: 14,167,613 m 10 $1oe,000 $3,000,000 17,275,613 Student Stations: 0 288 0 0 220 506 Total Classrwrns: 0 16 0 0 10 26 Cross Sq Ft: 0 21,000 0 0 12,000 33,000 Page 7 of 19 Community Development Department Adopted December __L_, 2015, Ordinance 2015- 0�a W2VM l5 8.20:49 AM Page D-5