HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-001 RESOLUTION No.98-01
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT
ORDER(D.O.)APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS FOR THE GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT OF
REGIONAL IMPACT(DRI)
WHEREAS,pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 Florida Statutes,the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County,Florida has adopted Resolution 85-128(adopted October
23,1985)establishing the development order approving the Grand Harbor Development of
Regional Impact(DRI),and has amended the adopted development order by the adoption of
Resolution 864(adopted February 5, 1986),Resolution 86-89(adopted October 20, 1986),
Resolution 86-108(adopted December 9, 1986),Resolution 87-147(adopted December 8, 1987),
Resolution 89-21 (adopted February 21, 1989),Resolution 89-80(adopted August 8, 1989),
Resolution 92-68(adopted May 5, 1992),Resolution 93-88(adopted May 11, 1993),Resolution
94-67(adopted May 24, 1994);and
WHEREAS,the project developer(GHA Grand Harbor,Ltd.)has formally applied for and has
agreed to certain changes to the development order as follows:(I)an update of the project Master
Development Plan and Phasing Plan and build-out dates,and(ii)the re-naming of the Office
Parcel and Commercial Parcel located west of Indian River Boulevard and changing the nature of
land uses allowed thereon;and
WHEREAS,the proposed changes will result in no increase in the maximum allowable
development intensity of the overall project;
NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County,Florida that:
1. The Board of County Commissioners finds that the proposed changes to the development
approval do not constitute a substantial deviation pursuant to Chapter 380.06 of the
Florida Statutes.
2. The Notification of Proposed Change To A Previously Approved Development of
Regional Impact(DRI)application and materials submitted by the developer,GHA Grand
Harbor,Ltd.dated October 14, 1997,along with subsequent and related staff and
applicant correspondence and all other related materials are hereby incorporated by
reference into the Application for Development Approval(ADA)for the project.
3. All conditions and restrictions specified in the project development order(Resolution 85-
128),and all subsequent amendments(reference the resolutions referenced above)shall
remain in full force and effect on the entire project area.
4. As designated on the project Master Development Plan,the"Office Parcel"is re-named
Pod West No. 1 and the"Commercial Parcel"is re-named Pod West No.2.
5. The updated project Master Development Plan as shown in "attached hereto is
hereby incorporated into the development order and includes,among other things, the
right to develop office,commercial and a maximum of 653 residential dwelling units on
Pod West No. 1 and Pod West No. 2 pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth
therein and as approved herein. No combination of commercial,office and/or residential
uses is authorized on Pods West No. 1 and West No.2 that would result in the generation
of more than 1,137 net new external two-way PM peak hour trips from Pod West No. 1
and Pod West No.2.
6. The updated Land Use and Phasing Plan as shown in Exhi ' " "attached hereto is hereby
incorporated into the development order and includes,among other things,the extension
of the phase II build-out from December 31,2000 to December 30,2005.
1
u
RESOLUTION No.9s. 01
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Eagert ,and the motion was
seconded by Commissioner Gi nn ,and,upon being put to vote,the vote was as
follows:
Commissioner Carolyn K.Eggert Aye
Commissioner John W.Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B.Adams Aye
Commissioner Caroline D.Ginn Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R.Macht Aye
This Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 6 _
day of January , 1998.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA
By:
/
JUM 1i. 11PP1N, CH44RMAN
ATTEST:;
Je0ey K:'%A'o my Clerk
/67 . , fir.
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS:
(1'. � -012r,
Robert M.Keating, AICP
Community Development irecto
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
William G. Collins _
Deputy County Attorney
u1c\s\ghdo.res
2
NORTH
z �- �►' , EXHIBIT "A"
s
SArd Street
1 �
'`,
...:: :
West'
No. N `1rA
C \Pod West '� 1`
X1.1 No.t
47th STREET
I�1 n
_..—..—
Legend Buildout
East
Sings
Multi-family Residential Single Family Dwelling Units 71
- Multi-Family Dwelling Units 2.482
Single family Residential Commercial 100.000 S.F.
- Marina 344 Slips
Mixed Use Golf 45 Holes
West
® Commercial.Office or Residential Any combination of the following uses that does not
exceed 1 137 net new external two-way PM Peak
Hour Trips
Office
Commercial
Maximum 653 Residential Dwelling Units
Note: Single-family dwelling units are permitted In parcels designated for multi-family dwelling units.
1 137 Net new external two-way PM Peak Hour Trips Is the number of net new external two-way PM Peak
Hour Trips that would be generated by the 348.450 square feet of commercial and 241.000 square feet of
Office previously approved.
HMMASTELLER & MOLER, INC.
^- CONSULTING ENGINEERS
1423 N.U.S. w,hnq 1. situ B2 6767 N. Wickham Rd.SA*400
PIL�( IJ)6"-40M 3%69 Mam(um4,Florida 32940 REVISED 12/29/97
Fail Is3°°ebtl Ss9- 2 Fay (4093 25-4i39 REEVISE0 112/19/97
9719dr11.0WQ
EXHIBIT"B"
Land Use and Phasing Plan
. ¢f{
Scall6
Buildout December 30 2005 Totals at Buildout
Fast: SFDU 71 D.U.
multi-Family 2,482 D.U.
Mia 344 Slips
Golf 45 Holes
Commercial 100,000 SF
West: Commercial (4)
Office (4)
Residential Maximum 653 Residential Dwel&jt Units 4
Notes:
I. Commercial land uses can be transferred to and from the east and west parcels as
demonstrated in the Barnes Tract NOPC (Resolution#92-68). Net new external vehicular
trips will not be increased.
2. ACLF development with nine (9) additional golf holes and ancillary health care facilities is
consistent with the multi-family land use and may be developed on multi-family parcels as
demonstrated in the reanalysis. New external trips will not be increased.
3. Single family units can also be developed on residential parcels with the appropriate reduction
in density. New external trips will not be increased.
4. Pod West No. 1 and Pod West No. 2 may be developed with any combination of office,
commercial and maximum 653 residential dwelling units, that does not generate more than
1137 net new external two-way PM Peak Hour Trips.
(rev. 12/29/97)