Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01/22/2014 (2)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA IMPACT FEE UPDATE WORKSHOP AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2014 - 1:30 P.M. County Commission Chamber Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Bob Solari Tim Zorc District 4 District 1 District 2 District 5 District 3 Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk to the Board 1. CALL TO ORDER 1:30 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman 3. PRESENTATIONS A. Staff Overview of Impact Fees 4. B. Consultant Presentation of Impact Fee Update Draft Technical Report (Initial Report) — - -- QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION A. Board of County Commissioners B. Members of the Public PAGE 5. WRAP-UP ® 11 January 22, 2014 — Impact Fee Update Workshop Page 1 of 2 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study DRAFT TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared for: Indian River County Community Development Dept. — Planning Division 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 ph (772) 226-1237 January 15, 2014 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 ph (813) 224-8862, fax (813) 226-2106 :® Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES -1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 Methodology = 2 Legal Requirements 2 Affordable Growth Strategy 5 II. CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES 9 Facility Inventory 9 Service Area and Population 12 Level -of -Service 13 Cost Component + _ 15 Credit Component 16 Net Correctional Facilities Impact Cost 19 Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule 19 Affordable Growth Strategy 21 Correctional Facilities Impact -Fee Schedule'Comparison 22 • III. SOLID -WASTE FACILITIES - 24 Facility Inventory 24 Service.Area and Population "' ; 25 Cost Component 25 Credit Component 26 Net Solid Waste Impact Cost 28 Calculated Solid Waste Facilities Impact Fee Schedule 28 Affordable Growth Strategy 30 Solid Waste Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 30 IV. PUBLIC BUILDINGS 32 Facility Inventory 32 Service Area and Population 35 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 i Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Level -of -Service 35 Cost Component 37 Credit Component 38 Net Public Buildings Impact Cost 40 Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule 40 Affordable Growth Strategy 42 Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 44 V. LIBRARIES 46 Facility Inventory 46 Service Area and Population f 49 Level -of -Service 49 Cost Component 52 Credit Component _ 53 Net Library Facilities Impact Cost", 54 Calculated Library Facilities Impact,Fee Schedule 55 57 Library Facilities Irnpact`Fee Schedule Comparison 58 VI. EMERGENCY SERVICES 60 Facility Inventory 60 -Service Area-and'Population 63 Level; of -Service ` �''y'_ 63 Cost Component - 65 Credit Component - 66 Net Emergency Services Impact Cost 69 Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule 70 Affordable Growth Strategy 72 Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 74 VII. LAW ENFORCEMENT 76 Facility Inventory 76 Service Area and Population 78 Level -of -Service 78 Affordable Growth Strategy Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 ii Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component 80 Credit Component 81 Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost 81 Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule 81 Affordable Growth Strategy 83 Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 83 VIII. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 85 IX. PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES 86 Inventory of Land and Recreation Facilities 86 Service Area and Population = 88 Level -of -Service j' 88 Cost Component 90 Credit Component 94 Net Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Cost 97 Calculated Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule 98 Affordable Growth`Strategy 98 Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee.Schedule Comparison 100 X. TRANSPORTATION` 102 . 3 Demand Component 104 Cost Component 106 Credit Component ' 112 Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule 115 Affordable:Growth Strategy 119 Transportation .Irnpact-Fee Schedule Comparison 122 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 iii Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study APPENDICES Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F: Appendix G: Population Transportation Impact Fee -- Demand Component Calculations Transportation Impact Fee -- Cost Component Calculations Transportation Impact Fee -- Credit Component Calculations Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Building and Land Values Supplemental Information for Correctional, Law Enforcement, Emergency Services, Government Buildings, Library, Parks and Recreation Impact Fees Master Fee Schedules Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 iv Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Executive Summary In response to high growth levels and the need to provide infrastructure to support this growth, Indian River County (IRC) implemented a Transportation Impact Fee in 1986. In 2005, the County adopted impact fees in eight more program areas. The technical studies for all program areas were updated in 2007; however, these technical studies were not adopted. Of the nine program areas, only the transportation impact fee was later updated substantially in 2009 by an internally generated County update using data from the 2005 and 2007 studies, resulting in a fee reduction for almo _tall, the land uses. The eight non - transportation program fees were slightly modified:t a 2009 update. Since then, the ee g County suspended the collection of five impact ftypes to©promote construction during the economic downturn, and more recently e tended suspensionlof correctional facilities, solid waste, and public buildings impact �f es Those three impact fee suspensions are nW� currently in effect. , ®0 3\ Indian River County has retained Tindale -Oliver &Associates, Inc. (TOA) to prepare an update study to reflect changes tbo=the •impact fee variables for all program areas. In a ci addition, the direction received fromst�he Board' of County Commissioners (BOCC) is to maintain the residential' a�nnduses at the current:level a dndevelop a methodology to reduce °3e t 6 . �o non-residential impae�fees. '\ I 4 ` ° Q To address the .goal of reduci g Pfeesrfor non° esidential land uses, TOA developed the �'r+ . Affordable�Growthmuethodology., which' -takes. into consideration revenues received from the existing developme- that aretused tows dcapacity expansion projects. As population growtht`rates decrease, the.. exis ing development's ability to assist in absorbing new a growth's impact while maintaining thedlevel of service (LOS) becomes more possible. The Affordable Gro th. method 'alculates the necessary impact fee levels to maintain the k. existing/achieved �R;I tgiven= ajicertain level of non -impact fee funding at an estimated growth rate. It is impdriant,;to note that whether to fund capacity expansion projects solely with impact fee collections r supplement them with alternative funding sources is largely a policy decision, allowing the County to contribute or limit non -impact fee funding in its service areas as appropriate based on its capital improvement planning goals and the nature of its existing impact fee program. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 ES -1 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established through case law since the 1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the "dual rational nexus" test, which requires`that they: • Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to the need created by new development paying the fee; and • Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development, typically accomplished through a list of capacity -adding projects included in the ff County's Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another planning document/Master Plan. rcff. , r d��gn In addition, one of the requirements of the 200_gi,Florida Impact e- Act is that the studies be based on most recent and localized data° a This technical reportreared to su has been 4�y prepared p pport`�legal�compliance with = js ing case law and statutory requirements. Altho Gghcthe Florida courts have yet to expressly address the methodology underpinning the Affordablle.°Grpwth Strategy,, this aspect of the report is based on the long-standing legal standards described in this report. The technical report also documents the methodology components for ,eachaof to impact fee areas, including an d.o__ ..QA• C,. . air, �- evaluation of the'inventory, service area, level of -service ('LOS), cost, credit, and demand components. Information support ng this ana ysis was obtained from the County and other sources,aas-indicated. Th report" eludess resultstfor all program areas, with the exception of edduAional facilities. Because the initia o sults have not yet been reviewed by the India River County Schoo Board ti his section isnot included in this report. `4.941t. Three primary=factors affected the Count's impact fee levels: • Since 2005, t'e;Counfy-built additional infrastructure and increased the capital asset inventory signing -0y in most program areas. This results in an increased asset value, which in turn, increases the impact fee. • In most infrastructure areas, the County used or is still using other revenue sources to supplement impact fees, such as optional sales tax revenues, ad valorem tax revenues, and other revenues. Depending on the program area and the level of on- going investment, this results in an increase in the credit component for some program areas, which in turn reduces the impact fee. In others, if the investment was made in earlier years and are not projected to continue at the same levels, the Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 ES -2 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study credit may decrease compared to the previous study, which in turn increases the impact fee. • Finally, the demand component is adjusted to reflect the most recent available data, which affects different land uses at different rates. The following table provides a summary of calculated fees for seven representative land uses. The complete schedule has almost 50 land uses and a comparison of all fee categories is included in Appendix G. Table ES -1 includes the following: • Current adopted fee; l • Calculated maximum impact fee; and fl. WI '41° req a • Calculated impact fee using the Affordal5l&Growth met odolo:y. lee TfiQ Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County ES -3 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table ES -1 Summary of Impact Fees — All Program Areas Notes: (1) All fees shown Include a 2.5% administ ative fee (2) "Current" column reflects current adopted fee levels. Of these, fees for correctional facilities, solid waste and•public buildingsare currently suspended. (3) "Calculated" column reflects the maximum calculated fees. (4) "Affordable Growth" column indicates the maximum discount that can be provided and still maintain the LOS..The discount Is first given to non-residential land uses, and then, to residential land uses, if available. (5) Because the calculations for educational facilities are not yet available, current rate is used under the Total Fees section for aIroptions. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County ES -4 Impact Fee Update Study L____CorrectionaLFacilities_ 1 I SolidWaste,Facilities I r PehlicBuildings_ 1 Libraries 11 Emergency Services 1 I II Affordable 1 [-Current IL Calculated II J ll Growth RE LUC l— Land Use Unit I I Ijj I Current - LCalculated]l 111 Affordable t1 Growth Current II I Affordable 1 Calculated 11 1 Growth I� Current JI Calculated IIINIMMII Affordable Growth 1 j I l( Affordable LCurrent II Calculated II 1 II Growth RESIDENTIAL. MIREE111WMCIIIIIMIE1 =WITEITEIWI Mnrrillrirl NEE Sin.le Famil 1500 to 2499 s =5=MIIMIRIMIIMI��' �IZEIMIltrITIII3 NON-RESIDENTIAL: IIIIMIEFAIECII ffE11111111013•11111W 31211=11riIIIIIIMEI IMEIFEINIIIIMEIWIII 1=11113113171111110011 =11111VEIMMI_r ENEDWITEre 1 000 sf MIIIERIIMETIWI 311111�31 =ESTI IIIIMEI_NI =NW !,11_ IMEMEITEE 1 000 sf 1000 sf MINEEt4TOI�EI —1 1_ J 11111•031111111=1111 IMIMM__1J IIIEN �LEITIIIIMITI I111_ MIME! INIMINIM E1 11111ENTIIIIIIME3 606 MMEEI WITIICII 1 000 sf; la ffrIMIREEIMIIIIIRI I�ffigI�tiN J IMMETIMME111111=EI MEM EM721111•111111E1 KM Fast Food Rest. w Drive-Thru 1 000 sf MEM 1 69911111111M1 1 3 1J (- Law Enforcement 1 1 Educational Facilities I Pa ks & Recreation I I Transportation I Total (All Fees) II I L Current 11 Calculated I Affordable I I Unit I III I I Current I 111 I Calculated II 111 Affordable GrowthGrowth .1111.11111 Current 11 Calculated 11 LL Affordable Growth_ fTE LUC �� Land Use _ — _ _ RESIDENTI L. _ I _ Current II LLL Calculated Affordable Growth I I Current 11 Calculated 1 LLLLLL Affordable 111 Growth _ MIIIIMIEFITIMMITI MIZMIIMITNI=SINI MEECIIIIIIMMIIIMEZEI MO= MIMI MEP= MIN Sln;leFamll 1500 to 2499sf MICIIIIIIEBIIIIIIMEZIEB101!J_ EI MIRIEIIIIIIIrBTIIIIIIIIEEZI / 906 MBRIIIIE'�' �' ______ 1571 i •r NON-RESIDENTIAL: 111.111 MIPEIMMEIMILETI MEM, IaEi_ 111131REIMME1111111FINE5 ISTINIEET 1000 sf ����" 1171"®TIIEM1/:i 5696 MBEIMEEL1 wrrilign 1000 sf mummiwirn� B !1£1MENEIBEEMEI 1E1E1 IIIINATIMEIEM IIINTIEMIEFITEITI MINIBMEIEM1111017.1 1964 MEEIMMTICTITIII =REM !TIIIIITI EMI L712212 1 000 sf Ircril1' !RECI iitiIIIIIIIIMINIEMENI ��f�e7.II� 1 �' 1111313151 liETIMMETIIIIIIIIMEI ��� :®i 1000 sf; la TIMI 666 666 MEM It7/111iiMI 520,970 KEN Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf ��� ��� Notes: (1) All fees shown Include a 2.5% administ ative fee (2) "Current" column reflects current adopted fee levels. Of these, fees for correctional facilities, solid waste and•public buildingsare currently suspended. (3) "Calculated" column reflects the maximum calculated fees. (4) "Affordable Growth" column indicates the maximum discount that can be provided and still maintain the LOS..The discount Is first given to non-residential land uses, and then, to residential land uses, if available. (5) Because the calculations for educational facilities are not yet available, current rate is used under the Total Fees section for aIroptions. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County ES -4 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study I. Introduction In response to high growth levels and the need to provide infrastructure to support this growth, Indian River County (IRC) implemented a Transportation Impact Fee in 1986. In 2005, the County adopted impact fees in eight more program areas, including: • Correctional Facilities • Solid Waste Facilities • Public Buildings • Library Facilities • Emergency Services • Law Enforcement • Educational Facilities • Parks & Recreation Facilities The technical studies for all program-areas;.were updated -in 2007; however, these technical studies were not adopted. Of the nine program areas, only the transportation impact fee was later updated substantially in 2009 byan internally.generated,County update using data from the 2005 and'2007-studies, resulting=in a- fee; reduction for almost all the land uses. The eight non -transportation program fees were:slightly modified in the 2009 update. Since then, the County suspended the collection of five impact fee types to promote construction during the` economic downturn,- and more recently extended suspension of correctional facilities solid waste,and public buildings impact fees. Those three impact fee suspensions are currently in effect. ' Indian River\County has retained Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) to prepare an update study to'reflect changes to the cost, credit, and demand components since 2005. It should be noted that figures calculated in this study represent the technically defensible level of impact fees that - the County could charge; however, the Board of County Commissioners may choose to discount the fees as a policy decision. In addition, the study includes "affordable growth" calculations, which take into account the existing development's ability to absorb new growth and calculates the level of possible policy discounts without reducing the level of service. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 1 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Methodology • • The methodology used to update the County's impact fee program is a consumption -based impact fee methodology, which is used throughout Florida. A consumption -based impact fee charges new development based upon the burden placed on services from each land use (demand). The demand component is measured in terms of population per unit of land use in the case of all impact fee program areas with the exception of educational facilities and transportation. In the case educational facilities, studentgeneration rate is used and in the case of transportation, vehicle -miles of travel is used.`,A-�consumption-based impact fee - charges new growth the proportionate share of the=`scost of providing additional infrastructure available for use by new growth. In addition, per -legal requirements, a credit is subtracted from the total cost to account for "contributions,of,the new development toward any capacity expansion projects through" other revenue sources:. Contributions used to calculate the credit component include estimates of future non -impact fee revenues generated by the new development_ that will be used toward capacity expansion projects. In other words, case law requires,that:the new development should not be charged twice for the same service. Legal Standard Overview In Florida, legal requirements \ related to impact fees have primarily been established through case-law since the`1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the "dual rational nexus"" test, which requires that they: • 'Be supported by a'study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to the need,created by new development paying the fee; and • Be speiitriii.a manner- that directs a proportionate benefit to new development, typically accomplished through a list of capacity -adding projects included in the County's Capita! improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another planning document%Master Plan. In 2006, the Florida legislature passed the "Florida Impact Fee Act," which recognized impact fees as "an outgrowth of home rule power of a local government to provide certain services within its jurisdiction." § 163.31801(2), Fla. Stat. The statute — concerned with mostly procedural and methodological limitations — did not expressly allow or disallow any particular public facility type from being funded with impact fees. The Act did specify Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 2 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study procedural and methodological prerequisites, most of which were common to the practice already. More recent legislation further affected the impact fee framework in Florida, including the following: • HB 227 in 2009: The Florida legislation statutorily clarified that in any action challenging an impact fee, the government has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of the fee meets the requirements of state legal precedent or the Impact Fee Act and that the court may not use a deferential standard. `-" • SB 360 in 2009: Allowed fees to be decreased without the 90 -day notice period required to increase the fees and purported to change the 'standard of legal review associated with impact fees. SB':360' also required the Florida Department of Community Affairs (now the Department of Economic Opportunity) and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to'coriduct studies on "mobilityfees," which were completed in 2010. " • HB 7207 in 2011: Required a''dollar-for-dollar credit, for purposes of concurrency compliance, for other impact fees paid-and:other concurrency mitigation required. The credit must be reduced by the percentage share the project's traffic represents of the added capacity of the selected iniprovement-(up to a maximum of 20% or to an amount specified by ordinance, whichever results in a higher credit). The courts have not yet taken up-the,issue.of whether a local government may still charge an ".impact/mobility fee in.;lieu of proportionate "share if the impact/mobility fee is higher that the calculated proportionate share contribution. • HB 319 in 2013: Applied mostly to concurrency management authorities, but also encouraged local governments'tol. adopt alternative mobility systems using a series of tools\identified in section 3180(5)(f), Florida Statutes, including: 1. Adoption `Of long-term strategies to facilitate development patterns that support multimodal solutions, including urban design, and appropriate land use mixes, including intensity and density. 2. Adoption of an area -wide level of service not dependent on any single road segment function. 3. Exempting or discounting impacts of locally desired development, such as development in urban areas, redevelopment, job creation, and mixed use on the transportation system. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 3 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study 4. Assigning secondary priority to vehicle mobility and primary priority to ensuring a safe, comfortable, and attractive pedestrian environment, with convenient interconnection to transit. 5. Establishing multimodal level of service standards that rely primarily on non- vehicular modes of transportation where existing or planned community design will provide adequate level of mobility. 6. Reducing impact fees or local access fees to promote development within urban areas, multimodal transportation districts, and a balance of mixed-use development in certain areas or districts,`.or'for affordable or workforce housing. ; Also, under HB 319, a mobility fee funding system expressly 'must comply with the dual rational nexus test applicable to traditional impact fees. Furthermore, any mobility fee revenues collected must be used to implement -.the local government's plan, which served as the basis for the fee. Finally, under HB 319,'an°alternative mobility system, that is not mobility fee-based, must not impose _upon new development any responsibility for funding an existing transportation deficiency. '.. The following paragraphs_ provide further', detail on`rthe generally applicable legal standards applicable here. Impact Fee Definition • , 'An.impact fee is a orie-time capitalcharge levied against new development. • An impact fee is designed to.cover the' portion of the capital costs of infrastructure capacity consumed by new development. • The principle purpose of an impact fee is to assist in funding the implementation of projects'.identified in? the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and other capital improvement programs for the respective facility/service categories. Impact Fee vs. Tax • An impact fee is generally regarded as a regulatory function established as a condition for improving property and is not established for the primary purpose of generating revenue, as are taxes. • Impact fee expenditures must convey a proportional benefit to the fee payer. • An impact fee must be tied to a proportional need for new infrastructure capacity created by new development. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 4 Impact Fee Update Study s Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Authority to Impose Impact Fees in Indian River County • IRC is a non -charter county. o A non -charter county derives its authority from the state constitution and statutory sources; o A non -charter county may adopt ordinances that are not inconsistent with general law; and o A non -charter county may adopt countywide ordinances that do not conflict with municipal ordinances. • The fiscal burden of providing countywide services' must be borne by property owners in both the unincorporated and incorpor`atedareas of the county. This technical report has been prepared to support legal compliance with existing case law and statutory requirements. Although the Florida courts have yet to expressly address the methodology underpinning the Affordable Growth Strategy, this aspect' -of the report is based on the long-standing legal standards described,iri this section. The technical report also documents the methodology components for each of the impact fee areas in the • following sections, including an evaluation of the inventory, service area, level -of -service (LOS), cost, credit, and demand components:,, Information,, supporting this analysis was obtained from the County and other sources, as,indicated.. Affordable Growth Strategy One pl the -study -goals, is toevaluate th'e, possibility of providing impact fee discounts to non=residential land uses: TOA developed the affordable growth methodology, which takes into consideration revenues'received:from the existing development that are used toward capacity expansion projects:; It calculates the necessary impact fee levels to maintain the existing/achievedyLOS given a certain level of non -impact fee funding and estimated growth rate. Three components of the affordable growth concept include a rate of growth analysis, fee buy -down by geographic,area, and fee buy -down of "most favored" land uses. • Rate of Growth Analysis — The rate of growth concept allows impact fees to be sensitive to the growth rate within the county. This approach reconciles the relationship between consumption -based and needs -based impact fee methodologies and generally reduces fees in built-up communities that are experiencing relatively slow growth rates compared to the size of the existing development base, while maintaining the existing LOS. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 5 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Buy -down by Geographic Area: and Geographic Goals — This approach allows jurisdictions to place a priority on select Activity Centers or the Urban Core to incentivize more efficient land use patterns as set forth in their Comprehensive Plans. For example, the geographic area buy -down could be used to meet the goal of increasing density and creating a more diverse tax base in the Urban Core, identified by the jurisdiction, by leveraging other revenues to offset impact fee costs while maintaining the current LOS. At this time, Indian River County does not have such high-density areas and is interested in countywide discounts rather than buy - down by geographic area. , • Buy -down of "Most Favored Uses" — This°'approach developed by TOA allows communities to establish policies for targeted"land 'uses,related to overall benefit and need for specific uses throughoutthe jurisdiction or- in targeted geographic • areas of the county. These benefits may also include improved'revenue generation through a more diverse tax base that brings economic stability-inhe future. Indian River County indicated an interest in encouraging non-residential 'development countywide in order to prornote economic development. As presented in the chartbelow, the Affordable -Growth Impact'Eee concept is driven by the communities' economic development and, growth management' goals, available funding, and the desired/acceptable LOS•for various program areas This approach provides the County with the necessary information to achieve a flexible program that supports the community's planning goals. Com prehensive Plans Master Economic Development P[bng o o J' f\ J‘ i Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 6 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study More specifically, the concept of affordable growth incorporates the following thought process and analysis: • Impact fees calculated under traditional methods are not sensitive to growth rates experienced in the community. For example, as explained previously, the consumption -based impact fees are based on the value of asset that is being consumed by the new development. These calculations are not affected by slow or high growth rates and do not consider the contributions of the existing development to maintain the current achieved LOS. • Historically, many jurisdictions within Florida -experienced high growth rates, which required a significant amount of investment in new infrastructure. With slower growth rate in recent years, the burden'of new growth has started to become more manageable. Indian River County experienced an average annualgrowth rate of 2.4 ff percent between 2000 and_2008, which ii,estimated to decrease yto approximately 1.4 percent over the next 2Syea;rs,,, • Affordable Growth incorporates the existing :community s ability to absorb a lower growth rate. with existing revenues"from current development while maintaining the current/achieved LOS. ',impact fees,-'ifcalculatedLcorrectly and adopted at the maximum level, would aIIIow a community to maintain its LOS for a given increment of�-infrastructure without any; additional=' revenue contributions beyond what was contributed from the_new developriment: = When additional funds from existing evelopment are`"also used +toward the expansion of the same infrastructure, the LOS -mill improve overtime. • It is important to notethat whether to fund capacity expansion projects solely with impact fee' collections;or supplement them with alternative funding sources is largely a policy decision, allowing the County to contribute or limit non -impact fee funding in its service areas as appropriate based on its capital improvement planning goals and the nature of its existing impact fee program. If the County desires to improve the LOS, there will be a need for supplemental funding in addition to impact fee revenues. Alternatively, if the County is satisfied with the existing LOS, the Affordable Growth Strategy reduces the impact fee levels and maintains the existing LOS as long as there are other dedicated revenues sources, such as sales tax, ad valorem tax, etc. For example, in the case of programs that are critical to the safety Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 7 Impact Fee Update Study e Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study and well-being of the residents (such as emergency services, law enforcement, etc.), the County may want to improve the LOS. Alternatively, a program area such as public buildings may not be as critical, and the County may decide to provide impact fee discounts in order to support planning and economic development goals and still maintain the existing LOS. As part of the impact fee update study, TOA evaluated the feasibility of applying the Affordable Growth approach to the County's impact fee program areas. The application of the Affordable Growth approach to each program area is included as part of the impact fee calculations in the following sections of this report. . ti Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 8 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study II. Correctional Facilities Correctional facility impact fees are used to fund capital construction and expansion of services related to land, facilities, and capital equipment required to support the additional correctional facility demand created by. new growth. Currently, the correctional facilities impact fee is suspended in Indian River County. This section presents the results of the correctional facility impact fee update study for the County and will serve as the technical support document for the updated correctional facilities -impact fee schedule. There are several major elements associated with -the development of the correctional facilities impact fee. These include: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population-- • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Correctional Facilities Impact/Cost • Calculated:Correctional Facilities Impact,Fee Schedule t- • • Affordable Growth•Strate6 • Correctional .Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison These:various elementsare summarized in the remainder of this section, with the result being the -calculated correctional facilities impact fee schedule. Facility Inventory. The correctional facilities inventory includes the County's jails and other related facilities that are primarily for the provision of corrections and does not include any of the buildings or portions thereof included in the calculation of other impact fees. According to information provided by the County, Indian River County has a total of 258,000 square feet of correctional facility -related space. This includes the square footage of all four phases of the Correctional Facility as well as other related buildings, such as the guardhouses, warehouse visitation building, and maintenance shop. Table 1 presents a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 9 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study summary of the correctional facilities land and building inventory, including a total land value of $1.8 million and a total building value of $63 million. As previously mentioned, these values do not include building space or land associated with other County departments. The building value per square foot is estimated based on research on recently built correctional facilities, discussions and information from architectural and construction companies, and the insurance values of the existing correctional facilities in Indian River County. This value is estimated at $250 per square foot'for correctional facilities and $125 per square foot for the other ancillary facilities included`in the inventory. Appendix F provides further detail on the building cost estimates. / The land value for correctional facilities is estimated at $50,000 .per.; acre based on an - analysis of vacant land values and parcels sold,in the County over th'e, last three years as well as the value of land where, the current facilities are located (see'Appendix F). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 10 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table 11-1 Correctional Facilities Land and Building, Inventory • Facility DescriptionI�� IRC Correctional Facility Phase l(s) Year ; Acquired/Built 1987 Number of Acres(1) I l Square j Feet(1) 1 1 Number of Beds(1) I r Land Value(2) 11 .- ,r— Building ; Value 131 -- Total Building and Land Value (4) 9.81 5.� ' 67,716 4a`> 149 $490,500 $16,929,000 $17,919,500 IRC Correctional Facility Phase II(5) 1988 `:W120 IRC Correctional Facility Phase III 1991 ':. 10.00 142 $500,000 IRC Correctional Facility Phase IV 2008 1630 . 181;600 301 : :$835,000 $45,250,000 $46,085,000 Miscellaneous Buildings on Site (6),: - , Guardhouse n/a , "` , ` n/a . 100 n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500 Guardhouse n/a 100 - n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500 Maintenance Shop „ ;,, 2008 n/a 100 n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500 Warehouse Visitation `{ :' - 2008n%a . - 8;884 n/a n/a $1,110,500 $1,110,500 Total 36.51 257,900 712 $1,825,500 $63,327,000 $65,152,500 Operational Capacity Beds(7) 612 Building Value per Square Footlst ?.!, y ! H i i l': , - ' $246 Land ValueerAcre) ; 1,,;j } ;;iji.�. p i. ; ,.l .. $50,000 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Source. Indian River Coun'ty;t.1 j`,.�•1 Number of acres multiplied'by the land value periacre (Item 9) Square feet multiplied by $250'in the case of correctional facilities and $125 in the case of miscellaneous buildings Sum of land and building value q l' i?`S .i.� Since the Correctional Facility and Detention Complexiand the Sheriff's Administration Building are located at the same site, it was assumed that each occupies 50 percent of the site {) f I j !_t These buildings are on the same parcels as`thecorrectional facilities Operational capacity beds is lower due to requirements to keep inmates separate based on their custody levels and classifications Total building value (Item 3) divided by total square footage Estimated based on vacant land sales and values for parcels with similar acreage as well as the value of the current inventory Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County 11 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In addition to land and building costs, the correctional facility services also require the use of necessary equipment and vehicles. As presented in Table 11-2, the total vehicle and equipment value is estimated at $2.8 million based on information provided by the County. Table 11-2 Correctional Facilities Equipment and Vehicle Inventory Facility Description Vehicles Units" 19 Unit Value (z) Val r $31;437 Total Value") $597,295 Vehicle/Radio Equipment 377 =- Y1;$1,172 $441,953 Weapons _212 �'j .'-'$.4()4 " $98,375 Office Equipment `` ' 'f1 $31,784 $31,784 Specialty Vehicles/Equipment = 3 $19,966 ', _ ;.. $59,899 Electronic Equipment 1 $1,077,078 -,.$1,077,078 Computer Equipment °`'.20 /$4,099 ',.:;$81,977 Miscellaneous Equipment-- `S4Q ,>:`-" ,$9,806 $392;240 Total Vehicle/Equipment Cost . , : - ` $2,780,601 1) Source Indian River County-'. (2) Total value (Item 3) divided by unifs(ltem 1) (3) Source Indian River County ;; Service Area and Population The correctional facilitiesimpact fee-,programrequires the use of population data in calculatingArrent level of -service. To ;)3e'consistent with the population utilized in the County's comprehensive;.planning process, this impact fee study considers not only the residentor permanent populatioof=,the County, but also the number of seasonal residents and visitors -as well. Therefore, for=: purposes of this technical analysis, the weighted seasonal population will be 'used in all population estimates and projections. Weighted seasonal population projections' used in the impact fee analysis reflect estimates provided in the Indian River County' -s2030 Comprehensive Plan for seasonal residents. In addition, correctional facilities is one of the program areas where functional population is used to capture the presence of all people within the community, whether residents, workers, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of effective population need to be served. A more detailed explanation of weighted and functional population estimates is provided in Appendix A. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 12 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Level -of -Service As presented in Table 11-3, there is a relation between population growth and the need for correctional facilities. Table 11-3 presents the average daily jail population over the last ten years, along with the corresponding population. The relation between the population and jail population is used to establish a general trend in the need for correctional facility beds, and to account for random fluctuations, the three-year average number of bookings and population also is shown. Table 11-3 Service Area Population and Jail Bookings rAverage Year 2003 Population�', 126,869 Daily Jail 'r (2) Population 473 3 -Year — Average �� -- - Change in 3 -Year Average r Population li Bookings it Population1 Bookings ,n/a n/a ' • n/a n/a 2004 131,175 529 n%a: `•, , �' n/a ''n/a \. n/a 2005 134,573 543 _- .. 130,872, -. _, .:515 n/a, . ;, n/a 2006 139,121 562`,:. . T.. 134,956 ' . ' 545 3.1% ,. 5.8% 2007 143,177 544 '438,957 \ " _ 550 3.0% 0.9% 2008 145,212 537 • -442,503 548 2.6% -0.4% 2009 145,356 513 .�, 144,582 ''- 531 ',, 1.5% -3.1% 2010 145,854 - '-518 1', 145,474 , 523 :,'- 0.6% -1.5% 2011 146,325-= -490, ' 145,845 / "507 0.3% -3.1% 2012 147,118 446-' 446,432' 485 0.4% -4.3% (1) Source- Appendix A, Table A-1 (2) Source- Indian River County The level -of -service. (LOS) for' correctional facility,services is expressed in terms of jail facility beds'per.'1,000 residents.: Using thi5,method, ilidian River County's current achieved LOS is 4.14 beds per 1,000 residents. The County's current adopted LOS standard for correctional • facilities is 4:5 beds per 1,000residents. Given that the achieved LOS is lower than the adopted standard;',impact feecalculationsfor correctional facilities are based on the achieved LOS. As 'mentioned -,previously, for impact fee calculations, the LOS should be measured using functional /population to capture workers, visitors, and residents to calculate the correctional facilities impact fee. In terms of functional population, the current LOS is 4.37 beds per 1,000 functional residents. Table 11-4 summarizes the calculation of the county's current LOS using both weighted seasonal population and functional population. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 13 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-4 Current Level -of -Service Component �- __ ,-- Population(1) Year 2013 Weighted - Population Functional Population 148,001 140,186 Number of Beds(2) 612 612 LOS (beds per 1,000 residents)131 4.14 4.37 Adopted LOS Standard (beds per 1,000 residents)141 4.50 4.75 (1) Appendix A, Table A-1 for weighted seasonal population and Table A-8 for functional population (2) Source Table 11-1 (3) Number of beds (Item 2) divided by the population (Item.l), multiplied by 1,000 (4) Source. Indian River County; LOS standard for functional resident is calculated based on the ratio of actual LOS in terms of weighted population`versus functional population Table 11-3 summarizes a LOS comparison between Indian -River County and counties with correctional facility impact fees throughout the- State .iof.Florida. The LOS-is.displayed in terms of permanent population for 2012 for all entities because functional population data analysis has not been completed for 'these entities, as it was for Indian River County. In addition, the number of beds for all jurisdictions•presented.in:the following table is based on gross beds. As 'presented, Indian River County's LOS is within the range of these counties. It is important to note that the construction of correctional facilities tend to be "lumpy" and requires significant investments for large scalesof construction. Indian River County completed its most recent expansion in 2008, which was funded primarily with sales tax revenues, and currently does not havexany plans to build additional jails. In addition, the average daily' occupancy of approximately 450 inmates represents 75 percent of the available functional• capacity.; As mentioned previously, correctional impact fees are not being collected iri' Indian River, County at this time, and there appears to be sufficient ,, • capacity available to accornrnodate additional inmates due to growth in the near future. This will be addressed further in the Affordable Growth section of the report. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 14 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table Level -of -Service Comparison Jurisdiction . | ___-' _ -- _�- Osceola County , Gross | "=°" /9opu|atio~o> . 2012 Permanent | LOS (Beds per 1,000�W Residents)") 873 280,866 3.11 Brevard County 1,709 545625 3.13 St. Johns County 664 196i071 3.39 Collier County 1,304 , / ` -'329,O49 3.95 Hernando County /,, 818. 173,104 4.73 St. Lucie County 1,376'/' 286,355 4.89 Indian R�m�rCounty (G�sdns) / -� , 712 139,446 5i11 Highlands County '' SO4 ��9SS � .-- .'--, 5.09 Citrus County ` :�- -• /6U14�761 `��»�� Ei40 Okeechobee County ~ `Z� � ' 39,805 ' _ 5.83.�� Charlotte County, ` '. 960 , .,` 163,357 5.88 (1) Source: Each jurisdiction'syespectivesheriffsm�����|���� Department' ' ' ''`. (2) Source:UniversitycfF�rda�Buoounf 8u�6 oh (3) Groobed�<|�eby�h�JO1Zpennanentpopu|udu�(|tem2}d�ided byl'O0Ofor each j ion | � *�—` � �' ^� /. Cost `' _. ' — Table 114 provides the t6tal asef Value per resident. As shown, total asset value owned by the CoUntY,,,:amounts to $0.9 million ,or $111,000 per bed. The total impact cost per functional 'resident for cOrrettional'''faCilities in Indian River County is calculated by multiplying the\tota,1 cost per bed by the LOS (beds per 1,000 functional residents) and dividing that figur6-by'1,00(Vwfitich is approximately $485 per functional resident. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. lndian River County January 2014 15 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-6 Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident Description ' !� 8ui|din8Va|ueW Figure $63327008 Percent of Total Value (« 9I2I% Land Va|ue`° $1,825500 2.69% EquipmentVa|ue(2) $2,780,601 4.09% Total Asset Value $67,933,101 10000% Number of8eds`~' ' 612 ' ' Net Asset Value per 0ed(w / � � � $111,082 CurventU33(Bedsper1OOOFunctiona|Residents)/CY' ' ` ` \ ` 4.37 Total Impact Cost per Functional ~~mV- (1) Source: Table 11-1`` (2) Source:Table|�Z ` .^` </ (3) Source:Table 11-4 ��; `. ``` ��, (4) Total ' - ` \ / \'-.,., (5) Source: Table 11-4 //�^' ' ' `�'' (6) Net asset value per bed (Item 4)mu�PUedbytheour�eni Cor�cdona|bci|iUesLOS (Item 5) ^-`�. di�dedbyl�OO � \' � ` equipMent value of tlie.otal asset value (7)Percent of building value, land value, and , / Credit Component . ` �_ . To avoid overcharging new deVelopment,for th'e facility impact fee, a review of the capital fincing programM,for correctiOnaLservices was completed. The purpose of this revieWWas todetermine bnypotentia| revenueCredits generated by new development that are being: 'Lied for expansion ofcapital facilities, land, and equipment included in the ` \ ''^ inventory. Capital Expansion Expenditur'es Credit The capital expansion 'expenditures credit per functional resident was calculated based on the capital expansion projects that were completed over the past five years and those programmed for the next five years. The average annual capital expansion expenditures were divided by the average functional residents for the same period in order to calculate the average capital expansion cost per functional resident. The County completed Phase IV expansion of the correctional facilities in 2008, which was funded with sales tax revenues. Since then, there have not been any capacity expansion Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 16 Impact Fee Update Study 0 A O Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study projects and there are none programmed for the next five years. This spending associated with a portion of the Phase IV expansion results in an average capital expansion expenditure of $2.3 million per year. Since the review of these expenditures spanned Fiscal Years 2008 through 2017, the average annual capital expansion cost is divided by the average functional population for this same period. As shown in Table 11-7, the result is an average expansion cost of $16 per functional resident. It should be noted that although the optional sales tax will expire in 2019, this analysis assumes that, if the sales tax is not re -adopted, another revenue source will be used in the future. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 17 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table 11-7 Historical Capital Expansion Expenditures(') • Description ;' FY 2008 11 FY 2009 11- FY 2010 11 FY 2011 1 FY 2012 1� FY 2013 if FY 2014 11 FY 2015 11 FY 2016 Ij FY 2017 1 Total Optional Sales Tax Revenues Housing Unit E Construction $22,756,006 4 •�_ --- - $22,756,006 Total $22,756,006 - - - �'`- / / ', - - - - $22,756,006 Average Annual Capital Expenditures(z) $2,275,601 Average Annual Functional Population(3) . 140,301 Expenditure per Functional Resident(4) ,, , ` _ $16.22 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Average capital expenditures over the ten-year period (3) Source: Appendix A, Table A-11 (4) Average annual capital expansion expenditures (Item 2) divided :6y`average functional. population (Item 3) „..71:14 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 18 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Correctional Facilities Impact Cost The net correctional impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table 11-8 summarizes the calculation of the net correctional facility cost per resident. The first section of Table 11-8 identifies the total impact cost as $485 per functional resident for correctional facilities. The second section of the table identifies the revenue credits for the impact fee. The credit calculation includes a total of approximately $299 per functional resident. The net impact cost per resident is the different between the total impact cost and the total. revere a credit per resident. This results in a net impact cost of $186 per functional resident.: Table II -8 Net Impact Cost per: Functional Resident Calculation Step ._ _-_ _ Impact Cost Impact Cost Revenue Credits Total Impact Cost per Functional Resiidentlll. $485.08 - Revenue Credit . ,, Avg Annual Capital,Expansion.Credit per Functional Resident(2) $16.22 Capitalization Rate- ; 4, . 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years)`• 25 Capital Expansion CreditPerFunctional,Resident(3) $298.84 Net Impact.Cost_ ; . Net Impact Cost per -Functional Resident(4) $186.24 (1) (2) (3) Source: Table 11-6 SourceTable 11-7 Source--Jhe present value of the capital improvement credit discount rate of 2.5% with a'capitalization period of 25 years Indian RiverCounty. f, (4) Total impact cost per,resident:(Item 1) less the total revenue Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule per functional resident (Item 2) at a . The discount rate was provided by credit per resident (Item 3) Table 11-9 presents the calculated correctional facilities impact fee schedule for residential and non-residential land uses, based on the net impact fee cost per resident figures presented in Table 11-8. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 19 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-9 Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule WC Land Use RESIDENTIAL' 11 Impact i Unit Calculated Functional jl Impact Fee per, Resident Functional I Coefficient r.1 Irl I a Resident ,I j Admin iI Total Isl I� Impact Fee ,' Feel�t _r) Current Adopted Feels) Percent 1t Change 210 Single Family Detached - Less than L500 sf du 140 5260.74 56.52 $267.26 5154.78 72.7% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 1.52 5283.08 57.08 5290.16 5174.25 66.5% - 2,500 sf or greater du 1.69 5314.75 57.87 $322.62 5188.60 71.1% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.84 5156.44 53.91 5160.35 5102.50 56.4% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 0.98 5182.52 $4.56 $187.08 5126.08 48.4% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 0.65 5121.06 53.03 5124.09 5101.48 22.3% 320 Motel room 0.60 5111.74 52.79 5114.53 5101.48 12.9% 252/620 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 5171.34 $4.28 5175.62 5109.68 60.1% OFFICE& FINANCIAL 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,003 sf 1.14 5212.31 55.31 5217.62 5190.65 14.1% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 1.66 5309.16 57.73 5316.89 5190.65 66.2% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 2.23 5415.32 510.38 $425.70 5217.30 95.9% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 sf 2.28 $424.63 510.62 $435.25 5178.35 144.0% 710 General Office 1,000sf 1.00 5186.24 $4.66 5190.90 5156.83 21.7% 760 Research& Development Center 1,000sf 0.85 5158.30 53.96 5162.26 583.03 95.4% INDUSTRIAL 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 0.50 593.12 $2.33 595.45 556.38 69.3% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0.28 552.15 $1.30 $53.45 $43.05 24.2% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 0.06 511.17 50.28 511.45 $8.20 39.6% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 0.69 5128.51 $3.21 5131.72 576.88 71.3% n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55 5288.67 57.22 $295.89 5169.13 74.9% n/a Sand Mining acre _ 0.20 537.25 $0.93 $38.18 521.53 77.3% RETAIL 820 Retail 1,000 gsf 2.37 5441.39 511.03 $452.42 5319.80 41.5% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 1.91 5355.72 $8.89 $364.61 5192.70 89.2% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 1.47 5273.77 56.84 5280.61 5190.65 47.2% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf ' 6.78 51,262.71 531.57 51,294.28 $821.03 57.6% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thai 1,000sf 8.90 51,657.54 $41.44 $1,698.98 $884.58 92.1% 850 Supermarket 1,030 sf 2.05 5381.79 59.54 $391.33 5227.55 72.0% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 1.50 5279.36 56.98 $286.34 571.75 299.1% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 5162.03 54.05 5166.08 5211.15 -21.3% 853 Convenience Market w/Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 5.83 51,085.78 527.14 $1,112.92 5474.58 134.5% 890 Furniture Store - 1,000sf 0.23 542.84 51.07 543.91 535.88 22.4% RECREATIONAL' 430 Golf Course hole 1.08 5201.14 55.03 5206.17 5273.68 -24.7% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 3.09 5575.48 514.39 $589.87 $265.48 122.2% 412 County Park ,, acre 0.20 537.25 50.93 $36.18 517.43 119.0% 491 Tennis Court court 3.16 5588.52 514.71 $603.23 5259.33 132.6% 420 Marina / berth '- 0.19 535.39 50.88 $36.27 517.43 108.1% GOVERNMENTAL' 732 Post Office - . 1,000 sf 1.62 5301.71 57.54 $309.25 5198.85 55.5% 590 Library 1,000sf 1.76 5327.78 $8.19 $335.97 5192.70 74.3% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf 1.39 5258.87 56.47 $265.34 5151.70 74.9% MISCELLANEOUS. 565 Day Care Center 1,030 sf 0.89 5165.75 54.14 5169.89 5112.75 50.796 610 Hospital 1,000sf 1.37 5255.15 56.38 5261.53 5175.28 49.2% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 2.54 $473.05 511.83 $484.88 5182.45 165.8% 560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 594.98 $2.37 597.35 559.45 63.896 444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 51,113.72 527.84 51,141.56 5948.13 20.4% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student. 0.06 $11.17 50.28 511.45 510.25 11.7% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0.07 513.04 $0.33 513.37 510.25 30.4% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0.08 514.90 50.37 $15.27 513.33 14.6% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students ,student 0.10 518.62 50.47 $19.09 511.28 69.2% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 0.63 5117.33 52.93 5120.26 570.73 70.0% Note: gsf = gross square feet (1) Functional resident coefficients from Appendix A, Table A-12 for residentia and lodging land uses and Table A-15 for non-residential land uses. (2) Proposed impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost per functional resident (Table II -8) by the functional resident coefficient (Item 1) for each land use. (3) Fee per functional resident (Item 2) multiplied by 2.5% to determine the administrative fee. (4) Sum of fee per functional resident (Item 2) and administrative fee (Item 3). (5) Source: Indian River County; fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee; fees are currently suspended (6) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 5) to the total impact fee (Item 4) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 20 Impact Fee Update Study • 0 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy In the case of correctional facilities, based on a review of capital expansion expenditures between Fiscal Years 2008 and 2017, the County uses approximately $2.3 million per year of non -impact fee funding. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure 11-1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum impact fee calculated in this report. This level is considered the investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of correctional facilities impact fee calculated, it the historical levels of non -impact fee funding were to be continued, the County would not need any impact fee revenue to continue to maintain the current LOS. It should be noted that the historical average non -impact fee contribution is based on ` spending made for the last jail expansion, which\was completed in 2008., -Since then, the County did not have any non -impact fee spending ,and does not have :any capacity expansion projects programmed in;`�tlie CIP. This is -.reflective of "lumpy" nature of jail construction in that correctional fa'cilities- tend to require' large scale investments that provide sufficient capacity.,for a longer term 'than most other infrastructure types. As mentioned previously,;the-current jail population is -approximately 75 percent of the jail functional capacity:.; ; { 300% 250% 20096 15096 10096 50% 0% Figure 11-1 Correctional Facilities Impact Fee -Affordable Growth Approach 0.0096 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.0096 7.0096 &C0% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County 21 Impact Fee Update Study ` — — Total Cost Maximum Iinpact Fee - IRC Average .Annual Giowth LOS Curve 0.0096 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.0096 7.0096 &C0% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County 21 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's correctional facilities impact fee program, a comparison of correctional facilities impact fee schedules was completed for other Florida counties. Table 11-10 presents this comparison. As presented, Indian River County's calculated fee is within the range of fees adopted by other Counties. • Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 22 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-10 Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule,Comparison • 1 Land Use Date of Last Update Unit(1) _Indian River County ; Brevard i County(5) •=7 2000 �:r: Okeechobee County(6) 2012 Collier, County(7) 2009 Hernando County Isl 2005 Highlands (9 County 2006 (Z) Calculated(2) 2013 Affordable 1 2013 Existing(4) 2005 • • Adoption Percentage 100% n/a 100% •' •,., 100%` 100% 100% 100% 100% Residential: Single Family (2,000sf) du $290 $0 ' . $174 $72 c'ti$533 $488 $7 $684 Non -Residential: Light Industrial 1,000 sf $132 , .,$0 $77 ' ..'r /a $110 ' m , $176 $3 n/a Office (50,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf $191 '• : . . $0 •. $157 .' '; $34 $258 " $362 $5 n/a Retail (100,000sgft) 1,000sf $452 ' $0 . -. $320 •$160 $551 $670 $10 n/a Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $435 $0 ,, $178 , $81 $551 $604 $10 n/a Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $1,699. $0 '$885 ' . $428 $551 $2,297 $16 n/a (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) du = dwelling unit Source. Table II -9 Calculated based on an annual growth rate '&3f1f.4% and nonimpact fee spending of $2.3 `million per year Source. Indian River County; fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee;,fees are currently suspended Source. Brevard County Planning & DevelopmentDepartment;-lndustrial land uses are exempt from impact fees Source Okeechobee County Boa�r',d,;of County Com�miissioners'Administrative Department Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing Source: Hernando County planning & Development�Department 0 Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28,,Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30, 2014 ( it,, 11 00 j {. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 23 Impact Fee Update Study O • 8 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study III. Solid Waste Facilities This section provides the results of the solid waste facilities impact fee analysis. There are several major elements associated with the development of the solid waste facilities impact fee: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Solid Waste Impact Cost • • Affordable Growth Strategy • Calculated Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Solid Waste Impact Fee Sciiedule Comparison These various elements are summarized in this`section. It -.should be noted that solid waste impact fees are not verycommon and there is limited literature. Solid waste operations are typically an Enterprie. Fund -and tend to be self-sufficient in'terms of funding. In the case of Indian River County,,,,the Solid' Waste Disposal District (SWDD), a dependent district, provides the solid wate,services.,' At thitirr e, the solid -waste impact fee is suspended in Indian River County. Prior to the suspension, the County 'charged,a'solid waste impact fee to both residential and non- residential;land uses. These fees were calculated taking into account both the landfill and garbage trucks used for waste collection. Since the last study, the County started outsourcing the"waste collection service. The landfill is used by both existing and new growth on a continuous basis, and as such, it is difficult to establish a need directly tied to new growth. As such, in this study, the impact fee calculations are based on the customer convenience centers, which are used only by residential land uses. Given this, the revised fee schedule includes only residential land uses. Facility Inventory As mentioned previously, the SWDD has the landfill site and also operates five customer convenience centers throughout the District for the collection of Class I waste, yard trash, Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 24 Impact Fee Update Study O Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study cardboard, newsprint, and mixed recyclables. The landfill and operations of the customer convenience centers are funded through an annual non -ad -valorem assessment and tipping fees charged at the landfill. In addition, an outside contractor provides waste collection services. As explained previously, the inventory related to the new growth consists of the customer convenience centers, which are summarized in Table III -1. The value of customer' convenience center buildings and land are based on the most recently built center and the value of existing properties. 'A more detailed explanation is / provided in Appendix F. Table III -1 Summary of SWDD Capital,Facilities Invento Facility Description ; i — - -- - Transfer Stations: Acres(' I Facility I Value (�) ; Land 1 Valuej._ Total Facility & Land (4) Winter Beach Customer Convenience Center 19.55: $2;600,000 $391,000 '; $2,991,000 Roseland Customer Convenience Center /'._ 1.38 ` ;$2,600,000 $27,600 $2,627,600 Gifford Customer Convenience Center_ `�;; 10.81 y ,$2,600,000 $216,200 $2,816,200 Oslo Customer Convenience Center '11.61 $2,600,000 $232,200 $2,832,200 Fellsmere Customer Convenience Center; \ -4.75 $2,600,000 $95,000 $2,695,000 Total f 48.10 ' $13,000,000 $962,000 $13,962,000 Land Value perAcre(5)- - $20,000 - (1) Source. Indian River County- , ' - (2) Based.on the -cost of on-going'exs.pansion of the Oslo Customer Convenience Center (3) Acres (Item 1) multiplied by the land value per, acre (Item 6) (4) Sum.of the building (itern 3) and land value (Item 4) ,y (5) Based'on a review of values'of land -where existing facilities are located and vacant land sales and values Service Area: and Population, ,..- Solid waste facilities are provided on a countywide basis. Because customer convenience centers serve only the .residential customers, weighted population is used in this analysis. The County's current weighted seasonal population estimate and future population projections are provided in Appendix A, Table A-1 (countywide). Cost Component Table III -2 presents a summary of asset value related to the solid waste impact fee and resulting value per resident ($94 per person). It should be noted that this amount also Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 25 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study reflects an average annual residential solid waste generation rate of 0.7 tons per capita per year. Table III -2 Net Impact Cost per Resident Capital Asset Component Figure Percent of Total Value (6) Total Building Value1�1 $13;000,000 93% Total Land Value(2) '$962,000 7% Total Asset Value(3) ; "-- - / $13,962,000 100% 2013 Populationl4l 148,001 Total Solid Waste Asset Value per,Resiclent(s) $94.34 (1) Source. Table III -1 (2) Source Table III -1 (3) Sum of the total building value (Item 1) and°the total°lan'd value (Item 2); (4) Source: Appendix A, Table.A-1, Countywide- `"• (5) Total asset value (Item 3) divided Joy population (Ite_m 4) (6) Each component divided by'total asset value s. Credit Component To avoid overcharging'new development for the'solid waste facility impact fee, a review of the capital financing program for customer care'facilities was completed. The purpose of this review was to-determineany potential revenue, credits generated by new development thatare;being used for expan`siori of capital facilities and land included in the inventory. As presented -in Table III -3; ,the County uses an average annual amount of $252,000 of the SWDD's revenues toward the ;construction/expansion of customer convenience center expansion. This amount results in an annual expenditure of almost $2 per resident, which is used the calculated the impactfee credit. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 26 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table III -3 Historical and Planned Capital Expansion Expenditures • Description') FY 2008 FY 2009 ' FY 2010 1 1 FY 2011 1 FY 2012 111 FY 2013 1 fff FY 2014 J FY 2015 FY 2016 - I FY 2027 J Total SWDD Fellsmere Customer Convenience Center - - $2,106,493 _, - , - - - - $2,106,493 Roseland Customer Convenience Center - - - = '. - - $960,000 - $960,000 Oslo Customer Convenience Center - - - • - - $1,250,000 - - - $1,250,000 Gifford Customer Convenience Center ' _ `,,;;;., $715,000 - - $715,000 Total - - $2,106,493 ,; - ,. - $1,250,000 'x$715,000 5960,000 $0 55,031,493 Average Annual Capital Expenditures(2) ._:, $251,575 Average Annual Weighted Population(3) .... . 148,070 Expenditure per Resident°) , \-. '\ . \ $1.70 (1) Source Indian River County, includes only the expenditures associated with' Gifford Centers) (2) Total expenditures divided by 20 years due to high investment levels during information provided by Indian River County. (3) (4) Source Appendix A, Table A-1, Countywide , ,,,'`• ;R Average annual capital expenditures (Item 2);divided by the average annual.weighted population (Item 3) capacity expansion (estimated at 50% of total amount for Roseland, Oslo and the,2008-2017 period; which are likely to repeat every 20 years based on Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 27 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Solid Waste Impact Cost The net impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table III -4 summarizes the calculation of the net solid waste impact cost per resident. Table III -4 Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident Calculation Step L— Impact Cost _ Impact Cost Revenue Credits Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(1)f_ $94.34 Revenue Credit Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Resident(2) $1.70 Capitalization Rate ' ''�, ,' 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) - - ; " 25 Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Residentl3i $31.32 Net Impact Cost- , Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident(4) \ $63.02 (1) Source Table III -2 - (2) Source. Table III -3 , (3) Source. The present value of the capital improvement credit per functional resident (Item 2) at a discount rate of 2.5% with a capitalization period of 25 years ' (4) Total impact -cost per resident (Item 1) less the capital expansion credit per resident (Item 3) Calculated Solid Waste>Impact,Fee Schedule, The calculated solid waste impact feefor each residential land use is presented in Table III - 5. The net impact cost per resident calculated in the previous section is applied to the average persons per- unit by' land use. The resulting total impact fees per dwelling unit range from $79 for the :multi -family residential land use to $160 for single family land use with 2,500 square feet or More space. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 28 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table III -5 Calculated Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC � Land Use _ . _ RESIDENTIAL r Impact Unit •. Net Cost Residents Irl per Ir per Unit I+l IIResident ,1 Calculated Impact feet" fee I Admin Fee I I J Total I j Impact sl Fee_t•l Current .Adopted 'I .1 Feet" Percent Change"' 210 Single Family (less than 1,500sf) du 2.05 563.02 $129.19 $3.23 $132.42 $76.88 72.2% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499 sf) du 2.23 $63.02 5140.53 53.51 5144.04 $76.88 87.4% Single Family (2,500 sf or greater) du 2.47 $63.02 5155.66 $3.89 $159.55 $76.88 107.596 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 1.23 $63.02 $77.51 $1.94 $79.45 $58.43 36.0% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down). du 1.44 563.02 590.75 $2.27 $93.02 576.88 21.0% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 $21.53 -100.09 320 Motel room n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 $21.53 -100.096 260 Nursing Home bed n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $33.83 -100.076 252 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF) bed n/a n/a $0.00 50.00 50.00 $63.55 -100.0% OFFICE& FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 5120.95 -100.0% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0.00 50.00 50.00 5120.95 -100.0% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 5120.95 -100.0% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $120.95 400.09 710 General Office 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 50.00 $96.35 -100.0% 760 Research& Development Center 1,000sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 596.35 -100.096 INDUSTRIAL 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 50.00 5241.90 -100.096 150 Warehousing 1,030sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $48.18 -100.096 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,003 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 $19.48 -100.0% 110 General light Industrial 1,000sf n/a n/a 50.10 $0.00 50.00 5241.90 -100.0% n/a Concrete Plant acre n/a s. n/a 50.00 $0.00 50.00 5218.33 -100.0% n/a Sand Mining acre n/a ' n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 5218.33 -100.0% RETAIL: 820 Retail Center 1,003 sfgla n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 $241.90 -100.0% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel poi. n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 50.10 $39.98 -100.0% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0.00 $0.00 50.00 5120.95 -100.0% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 5338.25 400.0% 934 Fast Food Rest w/ Drive-Thru 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 . 50.00 50.00 $338.25 -100.0% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 $434.60 -100.0% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 50.00 520.50 -100.0% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $78.93 -100.0% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0.00 50.00 $0.00 5434.60 -100.0% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0.00 50.00 $0.00 5241.90 -100.0% RECREATIONAL 430 Golf Course hole n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 50.00 $38.95 -100.0% 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 5120.95 -100.0% 412 County Park r , site n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 $87.13 -100.09 491 Tennis Court - - ., court n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $18.45 -100.0% 420 Marina - , berth n/a n/a $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $46.13 -100.09 GOVERNMENTAL 732 Post Office 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 $96.35 -100.096 590 Library 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 $96.35 -100.0% 733 Government Office Complex . 1,000sf n/a n/a $0.00 50.00 50.00 $96.35 -100.0% 571 Jail bed n/a n/a $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 516.40 -100.0% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center - 1,000sf n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 5241.90 -100.096 610 Hospital 1,000sf n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 585.08 -100.0% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 5120.95 -100.096 560 Church 1,C00 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 50.00 533.83 -100.0% 444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 5120.95 -100.096 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student n/a n/a $0.00 50.00 $0.00 512.30 -100.0% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 50.00 512.30 -100.0% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 513.33 -100.0% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student n/a n/a 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13.33 -100.096 n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $96.35 -100.0% (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-2 (2) Source: Table III -4 (3) Residents per unit (Item 1) multiplied by the net cost per resident (Item 2) (4) Calculated impact fee (Item 3) multiplied by 2.5% to calculate the administrative fee (5) Sum of the calculated impact fee (Item 3) and the administrative fee (Item 4) (6) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown include a 2.5%administrative fee. (7) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 6) to the total impact fee (Item 5) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 29 Impact Fee Update Study 0 • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy As presented in Figure III -1, due to the availability of a Targe amount of non -impact fee revenue and relatively low growth rate, the County does not need any impact fee revenues to maintain the current LOS. If the County decides not to use the recurring revenues toward future customer convenience centers, the calculated impact fee for a mid-size single family home would be approximately $210 ($94.34 multiplied by 2.23 persons per housing unit) and the full impact fee would be needed for this service z._ 160% 140% 120% « 100% m 80% r+ O 60% 40% 20% 0% Figure 111-1 Solid Waste Impact Fee — Affordable Growth'Approach IRC Average Annual Total Cost Maximum Impact Fee LOS Curve ' 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Solid Waste -Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As mentioned previously, solid:waste impact fees are relatively rare. Table 111-6 presents the comparison of Indian'River.rCo'unty's existing and calculated fees to those jurisdictions that do collect a solid waste impact fee. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 30 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table III -6 Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Land Use I Date of Last Update Unit(1) Indian _River i -River Count Y �' ' Brevard County Is► v - - - u City of North I (6) Port City of Fort Pierce h► I (2) , a1 Calculated I 2013 Affordable Growth(3) ExistingI4) II 2013 -- , -= 2005,== 2000 2011 2007 Adoption Percentage 100% n/a'-'„ . "" 100% �; :' ,100% 50% 60% Residential: Single Family (2,000 sf) du $144 . $0 „ $77 $160 $150 $136 Non -Residential: Light Industrial 1,000sf ,, $0 $0 "� $242 ii/a $90 $159 Office (50,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf ' $0 $0 $96 n/a $49 $87 Retail (100,000 sq ft) 1,000sf $0 -„$0 ' $242 n/a $104 $185 Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $0 ,, ' . '-- $0 . `•$121 n/a $64 $114 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf.' • $0 $0 ,; , $338 ' n/a $780 $1,387 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) du = dwelling unit Source: Table III -5 Calculated based on average annual growth rate of 1.4% and non -impact fee spending of $252,000 per year Source. Indian River County; fees shown include a 2.5%administrative fee, fees are currently suspended Source: Brevard County Pla'n'ning;&iDevelopment Department Source: City of North;P grtLEconomic;Development:Department;_Impact fee moratorium in effect through January 31, 2014 + r II Source. City of Fort.Pierce • Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 31 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study IV. Public Buildings Public buildings impact fees are used to fund the land purchases and capital construction and expansion of facilities and capital equipment required to support the additional government service demand created by growth. There are several major elements associated with the development of the administrative facilities impact fee. These include: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Public Buildings=Impact Cost • Calculated Public BuiidingsTlmpact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy - • Public Buildings Impact Fee:Schedule Comparison` i Facility Inventory -s The public _.facilities inventory includes -'facilities that are primarily for the provision of essential;county servicesand'do not include-any:of the buildings included in the calculation of other impact fees. According to`�information provided by Indian River County, the County has approximately 565,000 square feet- of generalpublic facility space. This includes the square footage of both primary and `support buildings. Support facilities are defined as trailers, facilities without air-conditioning, or,facilities that are unlikely to be occupied by personnel. Table IV -1 shows a summary of the public buildings inventory and the current value of buildings and land. As presented, the inventory includes a total of 414,000 square feet of primary bulding space and 151,000 square feet of support space. Building value of the facilities included in the inventory was estimated based on insurance values, estimates for future buildings, and cost information obtained from other Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 32 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study jurisdictions. This analysis resulted in an estimate cost of $210 per square foot for primary buildings and $50 per square foot for support buildings. In addition to building value, land values were estimated for future land purchases. Land value was determined primarily through a review of the value of parcels where the current public buildings are located, as reported by the Indian River County Property Appraiser, and an analysis of vacant land sales and values of 1 to 15 -acre lots in Indian River County. This analysis resulted in an average land value of $90,000 per acre. Additional information is J S included in Appendix F. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 33 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -1 Summary of Public Buildings Facilities Inventory(1) Facility(1) Primary Buildings Year Built Building (1) Square Feet _ Acreage(1) Building Value (2) Land (3) Value _ Total (4) Value New County Admin. Building Complex 2007 '-177;092 'hti' 5.71 $37,189,320 $513,900 $37,703,220 Health Department Building 1990 ,-39,130 '1:90, $8,217,300 $171,000 $8,388,300 Courthouse -Judicial Complex(s) 1994 116,007 2.17;;$24,361,470 $195,300 $24,556,770 Administration Annex 1962 , 8,400. ` ', 0.81 $1;•:764,000 $72,900 $1,836,900 Road & Bridge/Traffic Facilities ,Varies `18,350' ,�' 11.16 $3,853;500 $1,004,400 $4,857,900 Transit Admin. Building 2012 8;171. 2.86 $1,715,910 $257,400 $1,973,310 Supervisor of Elections Sub -Annex (43rd Ave) 2006, � ',' , 31,238 i ',. 5.82 $6,559,980 $523,800 $7,083,780 Emergency Operations Center 2007 ' 16,000\� ; '13.38 $3,360,000 $1,204,200 $4,564,200 Old Humane Society Building lr 1986 n a -4.77 n/a $429300 $429,300 Subtotal -- Primary Buildings �; - ' '.,414,388 - ' 48.58 $87,021,480 $4,372,200 $91,393,680 Support Buildings Courthouse -Judicial Comp,lex;Pa rrking Garage`-' .._1994' , 135,780 1.49 $6,789,000 $134,100 $6,923,100 '( )�tC RJ ') ,. Fleet Management Facility,;-�1'"- ,;. 2004 , 15,673 3.62 $783,650 $325,800 $1,109,450 Subtotal -- Support Buildings .,;:} 1 p� ';, �, ` v 151,453 5.11 $7,572,650 $459,900 $8,032,550 Total -- All Buildings �;-ti-, ' i i t), 565,841 53.69 $94,594,130 $4,832,100 $99,426,230 (6) '�1F` e"'$167.17 Unit Cost , s i l,. ,t t;1, $90,000 (1) Source: Indian River County \'1,01'1' 111:14 (2) Based on $210 per square foot for pYimarybuildiirigsand $50 per square foot for support facilities (3) Based on $90,000 per acre N'•U 4kr (4) Sum of building value (Item 2) and land value (Item 3) (5) Excludes square footage associated with Law Library, which is included as part of the inventory used in the library impact fee (6) Total building and land value divided by total building square footage and acreage, respectively See Appendix F for further detail. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 34 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Service Area and Population Indian River County provides government services to all residents, workers, and visitors the benefit of government services. As such the service area was determined to be the entire county. To be consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan, for purposes of this technical analysis, the weighted seasonal population is used in,alI population estimates and projections. As mentioned previously, weighted seasonal; population projections used in the impact fee analysis reflect estimates provided vin: the Indian River County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan for seasonal residents. In addition, -,public buildings is one of the program areas where functional population used to capture the presence of all people within the community, whether residents, workers, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of effective population need to be served. 'A More detailed explanation of weighted and functional population estimates is provided in Appendix A. Level -of -Service Based on the information= provided by the County, Indian River, County's 2013 achieved level -of -service (LOS) is -2"80 -square feet'of'primary faeilities,per weighted resident. Table IV -2 presents the calculation of,the existing LOS In addition, the adopted LOS standard is 1.99 square feet per resident. The -:County's Five=Year, Capital Improvements Program (CIP) includes the addition of approximately 10,000 -°square feet- of public buildings space. With this additional • investment, the LOS is estimated at 2-.78 square feet per resident by 2017. Given that both the current and 2017 estimated LOS are higher than the adopted LOS standard, the impact fee calculations `Were. based on ;the adopted LOS standard, resulting in more conservative impact fee levels. The`,adopted LOS standard is converted to square feet per functional resident, which resulted'iri.2'.10 square feet per resident, as shown in Table IV -2. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 35 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -2 Current Level -of -Service — -- -- --- Component Population(1) l-- / Year ---- 2013 Weighted Population Functional Population 148,001 140,186 Public Buildings Square Footage (Primary Bui|din8s)`~ 414,388 414,388 Achieved LOS (Sq. Ft. per Resident)13 2'80 2.96 Adopted LOS Standard (Sq. Ft. perResidento)w> ��^ ,-e---.5 1.99 2.10 Future L��/ .e�. r.- Population —Z017(u ,!,''l\ 153,612 144,582 Public Buildings Square Footage (Primary Buildings) --:,--''424,388���434�OO 424,388 Achieved LOS (Sq. Ft. per Resident)<N-,._:',2.78����`,r ����.�Q 2.94 Source Appendix A, Tables A-1 and A-11 Source Table w'1 Total square footge(|tem2)dividedbytheoo6 1) Source. Indian River CountyThe CIP includes the addition ',. 0.1-311:C Future public buildings square divided Dp�u|�on ``-`"^� Table IV -3 presents a,comparison of LOS Stihdard wiliiribp LOS standards of other counties. It is imPO:rtatif tOY•riote tharthe pciblie-baildihg,square footage for different jurisdictions is not--.1-r_eadily aVailable in \a -•format to p-royide an "apples -to -apples" comparison. As such',fipformatjOh-obtainedikarn a recent study on the LOS analysis for government buildings was LiSetraS' the bOis.for the',comparison included in Table IV -3. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 36 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -3 Level -of -Service Comparison Count y Seminole Total Square Footage(ll Footage Primary S quare q I1) Permanent Population(zl Resident(3) Sq. Ft. per 770,029 710,096 428,104 1.66 Hernando 319,946 313,305 173,104 1.81 Palm Beach 3,431,780 2,588,451 1,335,415 1.94 Pasco 1,027,749 922,219 ,-468,562 1.97 Manatee 829,913 763,290 336,302 2.31 Polk 1,692,402 1,416,373 ` K606,888 2.33 Brevard 1,418,931 1,370,073:1,' ; 545,625 2.51 Collier 1,436,493 891;384 329,849 2.70 Osceola 969,392 ; J. 807,020 280,866' 2.87 Escambia 1,263,692 ' 872,880 299,511 \' °\ 2.91 Indian River 565,841 \414,388 , 139,446 . 2.97 Marion 1,357,640 1,045,175 :/ 332,989 ' .3.14 Charlotte 664,786 641,994 , ' 163,357 '3:93 St. Johns 773,347. '� , 771,047 ._ , , 196,071 3.93 (1) Source Table IV -1 for IRC, "Collier Coiunty Government Buildings & Law Enforcement Facilities Level -of -Service Analysis,,2010"vfor other jurisdictions (2) Source BEBR,2012.final population estimates ` -, (3) Primarysquare footage divided by.permanent:population (Item 2) Cost Component c is > . \. The cost`component of the study evaluates the,cost of capital items, including buildings and land. Table IV -4 provides a summary'of all capital costs, which amounts to $240 per square foot of public buildings, and $504 per'functional resident. a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 37 Impact Fee Update Study • • B Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -4 Public Building Total Cost per Functional Resident Cost Component - --- I Total Building Valuer�1 Figure $94,594,130 Percent of Total Value (8) 95.14% Total Land Value(2) $4,832,100 4.86% Total Building and Land Value(3) $99,426,230 100.00% Primary Building Square Footagel4l / ., 414,388 Total Building and Land Value per Square Foot(5)$239.94 Adopted LOS Standard - Bldg Sq Ft per Functional Reside'rit(,1 2.10 Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(7) „ � ti .- $503.87 (1) Source' Table IV -1 (2) Source Table IV -1 (3) Sum of building value (Item 1) and land value (Itern 2) (4) Source Table IV -1 (5) Total building and land value (Item 3) divided by primarybuilding square footage (Item 4) (6) Source: Table IV -2x (7) Building and land value per square foot (Itemm5) multiplied'by building square footage per functional resident (Item 6) \ (8) Percentage distribution of building value and la'nd value in relation to the combined building and land value Credit Component" To avoid overcharging development°for the public buildings impact fee, a review of the capital,financing:program for public buildings wasconducted. The purpose of this review was to determine a'ny potential revenue credits that should be considered for revenues generated by new development that could be used for capital facilities and land expansion for public\buildings. To estimate an' average annual non -impact fee expenditure, capital projects funded the past five years and programmed for the next five years were reviewed. Basedon this analysis, a credit for these expenditures is provided in Table IV -5, which results in an average annual credit of $5 per functional resident. It should be noted that a large part of this funding is obtained from the optional sales tax, which will expire in 2019. The credit calculations assume that the sales tax will not be re -adopted. If the sales tax is re -adopted, the credit calculations should be evaluated to determine if a revision is necessary. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 38 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table IV -5 Capital Expansion Project Funding per Functional Resident(1) • Description 11 FY 2007/08 1 FY 2008/09 11 FY 2009/10 11 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 11 FY 2012/13 11 FY 2013/14 11 FY 2014/15 1I FY 2015/161[ FY 2016/17 it Optional Sales Tax: Total Expansion of Fiber Optic Network - - - - - $359,680 5118,508 - - - $478,188 Displaced Courtroom (Additional Offices) - - - - - - 52,000,000- - - 52,000,000 Emergency Operations Center 54,152 640 $306.586 - - - v- - - - $4,459,226 Subtotal -- Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues $4,152,640 5306,586 - - - 5359,680 52,118,508 - - - 56,937,414 Subtotal -- Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenuesm 5693,741 Average Annual Expenditures per Resident (Sales Tax)131 $4.94 Court Facility Surcharge: New Courtroom Facilities - - - , - - - 5250,000 - - - 5250,000 Subtotal -- Expenditures Funded with Court Facility Surcharge Revenues 50 $0 - 11 . ` $250,000 5250,000 Subtotal -- Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Court Facility Surcharge Revenues(4) i?11I 525,000 Average Annual Expenditures per Resident (Court Facility Surcharge)Isl 11 1 1 1,, 50.18 Optional Sales Tax and Court Facility Surcharge: Total -Public Buildings 54,152,640 5306,586 "`- - '?11iJ- - 5359,680 52,368,508 - - - $7,187,414 Total Public Buildings Expansion Expenditures perYear161 ........ ._ N'Ii, 5718,741 Average Annual Functional PopulationM . - 140,301 Annual Public Buildings Expansion Expenditures per Resident1e1 11111 55.12 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Public buildings expenditures funded by the optional sales tax divided by 10 years - - (3) Subtotal—average annual expenditures funded with sales tax revenues (Item 2) divided by the average annual functional papulation (Item 7) (4) Public buildings expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues divided by 10 years _- (5) Subtotal —average annual expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues (Item 4) divided by the average annual functional population (Item 7) (6) Sum of the subtotal expenditures funded with sales tax revenues and the subtotal expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues (7) Source: Appendix A, Table A-11 (8) Total public buildings expansion expenditures per year (Item 6) divided by average annual functional population (Item 7) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County 39 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Public Buildings Impact Cost The net impact fee per functional resident is the difference between the Cost Component and the Credit Component. Table IV -6 presents the calculation of the net public buildings facilities impact cost per functional resident. The first section of Table IV -6 identifies the total impact cost as $504 per functional resident. The second section of the table identifies the.- capital expandion expenditure credits for the public buildings facilities impact fee. The net impact cost per functional resident (third section of:the table) is the difference between the total impact cost per functional:resident of $504 and:the total revenue credit • of $24 per functional resident. The result -is a net impact cost' of`$480 per functional resident. Table IV -6 Net Public Buildinglmpact_Cost per Functional Resident Calculation Step Im.actCost ,_, Impact Cost Revenue Credits Sales Tax Court Facility Surcharge Total Total Im.actCost .erFunctional Residentl'i.--' $503.87 0 Revenue Credit '- Ay: Annual Ca.ital'Ex.ansion,Credit'Amdunt .er Functional Resident12i $4.94 $0.18 Ca.italization Rate � ` 2.5% 2.5% Ca.italization Period (in ears) - 5 25 Ca.ital Ex.ansion Credit .er Residentl3l, : - $22.95 $0.84 $23.79 Net lm.act Cost ', Net Im.act Cost .er Functional Residentl4ls $480.08 (1) Source: Table IV -4•, (2) Source: Table IV -5 \<'/-- (3) Average annual capital improvement credit per functional resident (Item 2) over a capitalization rate of 2.5% for 5 years for sales CA and 25 years for the court facility surcharge. The estimated discount rate is provided by Indian River County (4) Total cost per resident (Item 1) less the total credit per resident (Item 3) Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Based on the analysis conducted in this section, a public buildings impact fee schedule was 40 developed for residential and nonresidential land uses and is illustrated in Table IV -7. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 40 Impact Fee Update Study e Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -7 Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC - _�- - Land Use -------L__ RESIDENTLAL• j Impact Unit : _ - Functional I Resident II Coefficient' I _ 1 Calculated Impact Fee per Functional Residentfol i j Admin 14 Fee I Total Impact HI Fee 1 1 Current Adopted I Isl Fee Percent Chan q ge _ 210 Single Family Detached - Less than 1,500 sf du 1.40 $672.11 516.80 $688.91 5187.58 267.356 - 1,500 to 2,499sf du 1.52 5729.72 518.24 $747.96 5211.15 254.2% - 2,500 sf or greater du 1.69 5811.34 520.28 $831.62 $228.58 263.856 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.84 $403.27 510.08 $413.35 5124.03 233.356 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 0.98 5470.48 $11.76 $482.24 5152.73 215.754 TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 0.65 5312.05 57.80 5319.85 5234.73 36.3% 320 Motel room 0.60 5288.05 57.20 5295.25 5234.73 25.8% 252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 5441.67 511.04 5452.71 5319.80 41.6% OFFICE& FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf 1.14 5547.29 513.68 5560.97 51,306.88 -57.156 Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf LOCO sf 1.66 5796.93 519.92 5816.85 51,306.88 -37.55 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000 sf 2.23 51,070.58 526.76 51,097.34 51,490.35 -26.456 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 sf 2.28 51,094.58 527.36 $1,12194 51,220.78 -8.1% 710 General Office 1,000 sf 1.00 $480.08 512.00 $492.08 51,076.25 -54.3% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 0.85 5408.07 510.20 $418.27 5568.88 -26.556 INDUSTRIAL 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf 0.50 5240.04 56.00 5246.04 5384.38 -36.0% 150 Warehousing 1,000 sf 0.28 5134.42 53.36 5137.78 5295.20 -53.3% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 0.06 528.80 50.72 $29.52 $41.00 -28.0% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 0.69 $331.26 $8.28 5339.54 5524.80 -35.3% n/a Concrete Plant acre . 1.55 '. 5744.12 518.60 $762.72 51,158.25 -34.1% n/a Sand Mining acre - 0.20 596.02 52.40 598.42 5148.63 -33.8% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 2.37 .51,137.79 $28.44 51,166.23 51,569.28 -25.7% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 1.91 5916.95 522.92 5939.87 5944.03 -0.4% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 1.47 5705.72 517.64 5723.36 5935.83 -22.7% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sf 6.78 53,254.94 581.37 $3,336.31 54,021.08 -17.0% 934 Fast Food Restw/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 8.90 $4,272.71 5106.82 $4,379.53 $4,332.68 1.1% 850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 2.05 5984.16 '524.60 51,008.76 51,114.18 -9.5% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1;000 sf 1.50 5720.12 518.00 $738.12 5137.35 437.456 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 5417.67 $10.44 5428.11 51,034.23 -58.656 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 5.83 -. 52,798.87 569.97 52,868.84 52,326.75 23.3% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 0.23 5110.42 52.76 5113.18 5174.25 -35.0% RECREATIONAL 430 Golf Course hole .; 1.08 - 5518.49 $12.96 5531.45 51,339.68 -60.356 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 3.09 51,483.45 $37.09 51,520.54 51,301.75 16.8% 412 County Park acre 0.20 $96.02 52.40 598.42 $83.03 18.556 491 Tennis Court court 3.16 51,517.05 $37.93 51,554.98 51,272.03 22.2% 420 Marina - berth -. 0.19 591.22 52.28 593.50 $84.05 11.2% GOVERNMENTAL' - 732 Post Office 1,000 sf 1.62 5777.73 519.44 5797.17 51,134.68 -29.7% 590 Library - 1,000 sf 1.76 $844.94 521.12 $866.06 5941.98 -8.1% 571 fail bed 1.39 5667.31 516.68 $683.99 5477.65 43.2% MISCELLANEOUS. 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 0.89 $427.27 510.68 $437.95 5773.88 -43.4% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf 1.37 5657.71 516.44 $674.15 5858.95 -21.5% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 2.54 51,219.40 530.49 $1,249.89 51,253.58 -0.356 560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 5244.84 56.12 5250.96 5292.13 -14.1% 444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 52,870.88 571.77 52,942.65 54,648.38 -36.7% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0.06 528.80 $0.72 529.52 571.75 -58.9% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0.07 $33.61 50.84 534.45 571.75 -52.016 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0.08 538.41 50.96 $39.37 $92.25 -57.356 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 548.01 51.20 549.21 579.95 -38.4% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 0.63 $302.45 57.56 5310.01 5347.48 -10.856 (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-12 for residential and lodging land uses and Table A-15 for non-residential land uses (2) Calculated impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost per functional resident (Table IV -6) by the func Tonal resident coefficient (Item 1) for each land use (3) Fee per functional resident (Item 2) multiplied by 2.5% to determine the administrative fee. (4) Sum of fee per functional resident (Item 2) and the administrative fee (Item 3). (5) Source: Indian River County; fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee; fees are currently suspended (6) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 5) to the total impact fee (Item 4) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 41 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy Based on the data shown in Table IV -5, the County will use $694,000 per year of sales tax revenues for the next five years. In addition, the County uses approximately $25,000 per year of recurring non -impact fee funding for capacity projects. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure IV - 1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum technically acceptable fee. This level is compared to investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of public buildings impact fee calculated, if the historical levels of non -impact fee funding were to be continued; the'County could adopt the impact fee at approximately 90 percent for all land uses and continue to maintain the adopted LOS standard used in the calculations. If the County decides to buy=down all non-residential land uses at 100 percent (e.g., $0 impact fee.for,non-residential land'uses), the residential y land uses need to be charged at approximately 52 percent'to maintain'the,adopted LOS standard. As mentioned previously, these calculations assume that the sales -tax will not be re -adopted in 2019. If the sales 'tax�is: re=adopted in. 2019 or another revenue source becomes available for public building `s capital projects, these calculations need to be revised. Finally, the/level of discount is a,policy decision and could be at any level between the minimum levels` calculated'in this section and 100 percent and still maintain the adopted LOS standard: 120% 100% 80% 0 V 60% 1- 40% 20% Figure Public Buildings Impact Fee'—.Affordable Growth Approach 7 IRC Average - Total Cost - Maximum Impact Fee _ LOS Curve AnnualGrotivth 036r r r i r r r r r 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.0096 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% &00% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 42 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -8 Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule -Affordable Growth ITE LUC Land Use Impact Unit J Affordable Growth Adoption I IV Rate. Total ' Impact ;' Fee")Feels) Current Adopted j II Percent Changes 1 RESIDENTIAL: 210 Single Family Detached - Less than 1,500 sf du 100% $688.91 5187.58 267.3% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 100% $747.96 5211.15 254.2% - 2,500 sf or greater du 100% $831.62 5228.58 263.8% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 100% $413.35 5124.03 233.3% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 100% $482.24 5152.73 215.7% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 52% $166.33 $234.73 -29.1% 320 Motel room 52% $153.53 5234.73 -34.6% 252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 52% $235.41 5319.80 -26.4% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf 52% $291.70 51,306.88 -77 7% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 52% $424.76 51,306.88 -67.5% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 52% $570.62 51,490.35 -61.796 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 52% $583.41 51,220.78 -52.256 710 General Office 1,000sf 52% $255.88 51,076.25 -76.2% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf- 52% $217.50 5568.88 -61.8% INDUSTRIAL 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf - 52% $127.94 $384.38 -66.796 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 52% $71.65 $295.20 -75.7% 151 Mini -Warehouse / 1,000sf 52% $15.35 541.00 -62.6% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 52% $176.57 5524.80 -66.496 n/a Concrete Plant acre 52% $396.61 51,158.25 -65.8% n/a Sand Mining acre 52% $51.18 5148.63 -65.6% • RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 52% $606.44 51,569.28 -61.4% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 52% $488.73 5944.03 -48.2% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf X52% $376.14 $935.83 -59.8% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 52% $1,734.88 54,021.08 -56.9% 934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 52% $2,277.36 $4,332.68 -47 4% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 52% $524.55 51,114.18 -52.9% 942 Automobile Repair/Body,Shop 1,000sf 52% $383.82 5137.35 179.4% 947 Self -Service Car Wash-, service bay 52% $222.62 51,034.23 -78.5% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps ' ` 1,000 sf 52% $1,491.80 52,326.75 -35.9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 52% 558.86 5174.25 -66.2% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 52% $276.35 51,339.68 -79.4% 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio ; 1,000sf 52% $790.67 51,301.75 -39.3% 412 County Park t acre 52% $51.18 583.03 -38.4% 491 Tennis Court court 52% $808.59 51,272.03 -36.4% 420 Marina berth 52% $48.62 584.05 -42.1% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000 sf 52% $414.53 51,134.68 -63.5% 590 Library 1,000sf 52% $450.35 5941.98 -52.2% 571 Jail bed 52% $355.68 5477.65 -25.5% MISCELLANEOUS: • 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 52% $227.73 $773.88 -70.6% 610 Hospital 1,000sf 52% $350.56 $858.95 -59.2% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 52% $649.94 51,253.58 -48.2% 560 Church 1,000sf 52% $130.50 5292.13 -55.3% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 52% $1,530.18 54,648.38 -67.1% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 52% $15.35 571.75 -78.6% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 52% $17.92 $71.75 -75.0% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 52% $20.47 592.25 -77.8% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 52% $25.59 579.95 -68.0% n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf 52% $161.20 $347 48 -53.6% (1) Based on annual growth rate of 1.4% and non -impact fee spending of $719,000 per year for the next five years and $25,000 per year afterwards (2) Source: Calculated 100% impact fee from Table IV -7 multiplied by affordable growth adoption rate (Item ) (3) Source: Indian River County; fees shown include a 2.556 administrative fee. Fees are currently suspended. (4) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 2) to the total impact fee (Item 1) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 43 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County I Impact Fee.Update Study Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's public buildings impact fee schedule, the County's calculated impact fee schedule was compared to the adopted fee schedule and those in similar or nearby jurisdictions. Table IV -9 presents this comparison. . .� `/ ` Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table IV -9 Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Land Use Date of Last U•date Unitltl [ _ _ __ Indian River County St. Lucie CountyIsi 2009 Charlotte County's) 2009 Citrus Countypi 2010 Collier 1 County's) I 2010 Hernando County 2005 Martin County") 2012 St. Johns I Countu 2011 ) Calculatedn 2013 Affordable ) Growth 2013 Existing 2005 Ado tion Percenta:e 100% n/a 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% Residential: Sin le Famil 2,000sf du $748 5748 5211 $336 $404 $264 $766 $466 5646 5565 Non -Residential: Li:ht Industrial 1,000sf $340 $177 $525 568 5140 560 $271 5168 5182 5210 Office 50,000s• ft 1,000sf $492 5256 51,076 5297 5254 5151 5558 5335 5316 5600 Retail (100,000s• ft) 1,000sf 51,166 5606 51,569 15504 5391 5305 5966 $651 5551 $1,158 Bankw/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 51,122 5583 51,221 13i(?$504 $551 $305 $895 5651 5554 5456 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 54,380 52,277 54,333 '1115504 51,575 5305 53,539 $1,012 $2,482 $1,015 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table IV -7 (3) Source: Table IV -8 • (4) Source: Indian River County; fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee; fees are currently suspended (5) Source: St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department. Fees have been increased'teabove rates through annual indexing (6) Source: Charlotte County Planning & Land Development Department. In Charlotte, bank w/drive-thru is charged "per lane" Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended (7) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department (8) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing (9) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department (10) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department 72.7 (11) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates throiigh.annual indexing • Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 45 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study V. Libraries Library impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of library services related buildings, land, and materials/equipment required to support the additional library facilities demand created by new growth. This section provides the results of the library impact fee analysis. There are several major elements associated with the development of the library facilities impact fee: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Library Facilities Impact^Cost • • • Calculated Library Facilities iinpactEee Schedule Affordable Growth Strategy Library FacilitiesImpact Fee Schedule Comparison These various elements are summarized) in this section. It } mshould be noted that library impact fees are chargedito.residential land uses only. Facility Inventory The IRC Library Service operates five libraries with a total square footage of 110,000. The following table presents the inventory of library facilities. The building value is estimated at $240 per square foot based on recent library construction and insurance values of existing libraries. Land value.for library buildings is estimated at $50,000 per acre based on value of current parcels and an analysis of recent vacant land sales and values. Appendix F provides additional information on building and land value estimates. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 46 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table V-1 Library Land & Building Inventory • Facility Description Main Libra Address j I 1600 21st Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Year tlt Built I 19917 tet Acres 4-4 1.80 1 Square I tat Footage ; ,i ii 49,286 Land tat Value I $209,000 Building Value tst $11,828,640 Total Building and Land Value (6) $12,037,640 North County Library 1001 CR 512, Sebastian, FL 32958 '„1993 4"115 „ 25,445 $205,750 $6,106,800 $6,312,550 Law Libra 2000 16th Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32960.: ' 1994 n/a =`:- 3,993 n/a $958,320 $958,320 Gifford Youth Activities Center Library487543rd Avenue, Vero Beach, FL : n a / n a / t `±1,513 n a / $363,120 $363,120 Brackett Libra 6155 College Lane, Vero Beach, FL 32966,: \•'2009 n/a 30;000 n/a $7,200,000 $7,200,000 Total ". 8.295 110,237 $414,750 $26,456,880 $26,871,630 Land Value perAcret't $50,000 Building Value per Square Foot(8) � $240 (1) (2) Source. Indian River County Source: Indian River County; Land associated with•Law, Gifford Youth Activities'Center and Brackett Libraries are not included because they are either not owned by the County or are accounted for in another” impact fee program area r (3) Source: Indian River County '' (4) Acres (Item 2) multiplied by the land value per acre (Item 7) (5) Square footage (Item 3) multiplied by building.value per square foot (Item 8)";., (6) Sum of land value (Item 4) and building value (Item'5),: • (7) Based on a review of vacant land 'sales"'and .values. See Appendix F for additional detail. ;tx s,,,n, t.11 ;tl, (8) Based on recent construction; insurance values; and other available \materials. See Appendix F for additional detail. •'i 1i.'t. tt. r fl! .tt; Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 47 Impact Fee Update Study e A Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study The five facilities identified in Table V-1 house a wide variety of materials available to the public. Table V-2 presents the inventory of library materials. Table V-2 Library Material Invento Description Books: ( Units" [ Unit Cost(l) ,Total Value(2) Gifford Youth Activities Center Library 9,724 _ $25 $243,100 Law Library 225 - =r $80 $18,000 Main, North, Brackett Libraries: - All Books 443,181 \' $53 $23,488,593 - Electronic Resources — 28,812 '•, \ $100 $2,881,200 - Electronic Books ' 1,525 ''\ -,_$100 $152,500 - Serials 14,027 =,$75 $1,052,025 - Books on Tape/CD` _ 15,023 $75 •':, $1,126,725 Total - Books '=' 512,517 ` ` '-, $28,962,143 Online Resources: Online Resource Subscriptions , ` _ . 68 $4,094 $278,392 Other Library Items: Music CDs " -16,200 , $15 $243,000 DVDs - ``�; ` ; .24,798 '''; $20 $495,960 Videos�' -,. • ', --,4,386 - $15 $65,790 Print Subscriptions : 1,775 $39 $69,225 Other Print Materials 24,775 $50 $1,238,750 Total --Other Library -Items 71,934 $2,112,725 Total- All Library Materials, ' - t: - ` ,584,519 $31,353,260 Total Value per Item�31 �' -•,- _� $54 (1);.'Source. Indian River.County'-\, (21"' -Number of units multiplied by the cost (3) Total value for all library" materials divided by the total units for all library materials In addition to the available material, the IRC Library System owns a variety of equipment, both for public use and; for its own operations. Table V-3 presents the inventory of equipment for public versus operational use. It should be noted that impact fee standards are based on the equipment for public use, excluding the equipment used by the library staff. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 48 Impact Fee Update Study O e Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-3 Library Equipment Inventory Equipment Copiers Number r Public—( I 6l of Items(1) — — _— 10 Unit 1) , ( Cost ,' $7,000 Total Equipment Value") $70,000 Staff I 4 Total Book Scribe Copier 1 0 1 $16,500 $16,500 Laser Printers 10 6 16 $2,136 $34,176 Computers 121 74 / 195 $900 $175,500 Large Print Readers 1 0 '- , 1 $5,000 $5,000 30" TV 1 /0 1 $800 $800 45" TVs 1 `� 0'°' '" \.1 $2,000 $2,000 52" TVs 1 - '• "0 1 $2,356 $2,356 42" TVs T 0 1 ' :-$1,527 $1,527 46" TVs _1. 0 1 \$2;205 $2,205 32" TVs 0 _ 3 $2;428 , $7,284 Dollar Changer g 1 \ 0 :'- 1 $2,955 . `o, $2,955 Laminator 1 1 $1,265 $1,265 Camcorder � -".--;_1 0; , 1 $800 $800 LCD Projectors '`= _ 0 • 5 $2,500 $12,500 Total - All Items •>,154 , _ - `,85 • •239 $334,868 Total - All (excluding computers) :` 33 .11 44 ' $159,368 1) Source: Indian River County.,. ;'•, (2) Number of iterrisrvMultiplied by the unit cost Service Area and -Population Library se-rvices are provided,on a`countywide basis and the impact fee is charged only to residential'' land, uses. As such, consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan, countywide weighted seasonal population is used in the calculation. The County's current population estimatesand future population projections are provided in Appendix A, Table A-1. Level -of -Service The following table provides a summary of the current LOS as well as the adopted LOS standard for library buildings, books, other library materials, and computers in Indian River County. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 49 Impact Fee Update Study 110 e Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-4 Level -of -Service (2013 r Item j Sq. Footage/ 1 Population' LOS (per 1,000 Adopted LOS Standard (per 1,000 Count" ! Residents)(3) (4) Residents) Library Buildings (sf) 110,237 148,001 745 580 Library Materials (items) 584,519 148,001 3,949 3,200 Computersisl 121 148,001 r 0.8 0.7 Other Library Equipment (items)(5) 33 148;001 0.2 0.2 (1) Source. Table V-1 for buildings, Table V-2 for materials,,and Table V-3 for computers and equipment (2) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1 (3) Square footage/count (Item 1) divided by population.(Item 2) multiplied'by 1,000 (4) Source. Indian River County (5) Source Table V-3; only computers and equipment available for public use are included As presented in the table, the County's current'LOS,is above.the adopted, LOS standard for all elements, except for other lib"racy equipment. For impact fee calculations, the adopted LOS standard is used in order to ensure new development is not overcharged. In addition, a review of the CIP indicated that there\are no capital expansion projects programmed for the - next five years. As such7 the ,existing , LOS, is likely to decrease somewhat, which suggests that it is preferable to use -the, adopted LOS °standard t� -provide a more conservative approach. A comparison_of the current Indian'River'County°LOS, the adopted LOS standard, LOS of the other Florida counties, and the suggested State standards is presented in Table V-5. The comparison includes counties with;apopulation of 100,000 to 750,000, and is based on the information ._:obtained from 'the Library Directory with Statistics, published by the Department of,State, Division of Library and Information Services. It should be noted that the current LOS'figures included in the table for Indian River County represent figures provided by the Division of"Library and Information Services and reflect FY 2013 data with the use of permanent population. To be able to provide an "apples -to -apples" comparison, 2013 data is used for Indian River County and its peer group. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 50 Impact Fee Update Study O 0 O Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table V-5 Comparison of IRC Current LOS to Florida Standards Item IRC Achieved ;'LOS (per 1,0001 Residents)111 Library Buildings (sq. ft.) Library Materials(3) Computers 745 3,949 0.8 IRC LOS 11 Standard (per 1,000 Residents)(11 580 3,200 0.70 FL Public Library Standardslz) Essential 600 2,000 / 0.30 Enhanced 700 3,000 0.50 Exemplary 1,000 4,000 1.00 (1) (2) (3) Source: Table V-4 Source: Standards for Florida Public Libraries, 2004, Updated Apri1.2013 Library materials include books, online resources, subscriptions; and other library items i IRC's adopted LOS standard for buildings does not meet the Florida Library Association's (FLA) essential standards. However, the County's adopted standard 'for library materials and computers and achieved LOS for all other. areas are betweeri'.thhe, enhanced and exemplary LOS standards established,by the State.. The following table provides a comparbn of -the current IRC LOS to those of surrounding counties. IRC's LOS is higher than surrounding -counties in all areas, except for computers. In terms of computers, IRC ranks second after Brevard.County. y Table V-6 Comparison of IRC Current LOS to,Surrouriding Counties (per 1,000 residents) Item Libra Materials(1),. Com . utersl2l Indian River (Existing)131_ :745 3,949 • '0.8 Brevard 700 2,662 1.0 Per 1,000 Residents Osceola 337 1,011 0.5 Okeechobee St. Lucie L ; 388 2,256 0.4 317 1,146 0.4 Avg. of Peer Group(4) _ 422 1,898 0.7 Avg. of Other FL Countieslsl 500 2,074 0.8 (1) Library materials for,IRC include books, CDs, DVDs, videos, print, and online resource subscriptions. Library materials`for other counties include books, serial subscriptions, and Audio/video volumes (2) Source: Department of State — Division of Library & Information Services, 2009/10 Library Directory with Statistics, Includes public computers only (3) Source: Table V-4 (4) Peer group includes jurisdictions with 100,000 to 750,000 service area population (excluding IRC) (5) Includes all jurisdictions in Florida (excluding IRC) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 51 Impact Fee Update Study • O Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component Costs are calculated separately for facilities and items/equipment. Facility costs are based on the estimated cost to add the next library building, and the cost of library items and equipment is based on the estimated current value per unit. Buildings and Land Table V-7 summarizes the calculation of library facility and= land values. The total impact cost or total value per resident for library buildings and land in' Indian River County is $141. Table V-7 Building and Land,Cost,per Resident_, Element 1 _ Figure Total Building Value Ili$26;456;880 Total Land Value(2) $414;750 Total Building and Land.Valuel3i 7' $26,871,630 Building Square Footage.4i 110,237 Total Building and Land Cost per.Square Foot(5) ;" , $243.76 Adopted=LOS.Standard (sf per 1,000 residents)(6) 580 Total Building and'Land Cost per Resident(')- • $141.38 (1) Source Table V-1 (2) Source: Table V-1 (3) Sum of,building value (Item 1) and lat d value (item 2) (4) -;Source: Table`V-1 (5) --Building and land,value (Item:3) divided'by building square footage (Item 4) (6) Souree::Table V-4 (7) Total building and'land value per square foot (Item 5) multiplied by the adopted LOSS (Item 6),dvided by 1,000 •ti Library Materials and Equipment The following table'provides a summary of library materials and equipment costs per resident, which amountszto;$175. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 52 Impact Fee Update Study 0 • 0 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-8 Library Materials and Equipment Cost per Resident Element Library Materials Value per Item(1) i Figure $54 Adopted LOS Standard for Materials per Resident(2) 3.20 Library Materials Value per Resident(3) $172.80 Computers - Unit Value(4) $1,450 Adopted LOS Standard for Computers per Resident(5) % :. ; 0.0007 Computer Value perResident(6) $1.02 Other Library Equipment Value per Item(7) / $4,829 Adopted LOS Standard for Other Library Equipment per Resident(8) 0.0002 Other Library Equipment Value per Resident(9) $0.97 Total Materials and Equipment Cost per Resident(10) - $174.79 1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Source. Table V-2 Source. Table V-4 '4` 4. Library materials value per; itedm (Item 1) multiplieby'the-adopted LOS standard: for materials per resident (Item 2) - Source: Table V-3; Total value,divided by the number of items available for public use Source: Table V-4 Unit value of computers (Item 4)-multiplied`by the.adopted LOS'standard for computers per resident.,(Item 5) , t Source: Table V-3; Total -Value divided:b the number of items available for public use Source: Table V-4 .. . Other library, equipment cosi (Item 7) m'uftiplied by the adopted LOS standard for other library equipment per resident.(Item 8) (10) Siim'of library materials, computer`; and other library equipment costs per resident _;(Items -3,6, and 9) Credit Component To avoid overcharging new development, a review of funding for library capital expansion projects over th'e past five,`years and those programmed for the next five years was completed. The purpose..ofthis review was to determine any potential revenues generated by new development, othler``than impact fees, that are being used or will be used to fund the expansion of capital facilities, land, and materials for the County's libraries program. This review suggests that historically the County used primarily State grants to fund a portion of capacity expansion over the past five years and has no capacity projects included in the CIP. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 53 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Capital Improvement Credit Table V-9 summarizes the library related capital expansion projects that are funded by state grants. The table includes recent expenditures for the years 2008 through 2017. The average annual capital expansion expenditure during this five-year period is $0.34 per resident. This figure is calculated by dividing the average annual total capital expenditure amount for the ten-year period by the County's average population during the same time period. Table V-9 Historical Library Capital Expansion Funding Sources Fiscal Year Construction of Brackett Library: > State Library Grant Total FY 2008 ` $0 -' , $0 FY 2009 = ; . ,/ `, $300,000 '' ., \-$300,000 FY 2010.- $200,000 '$200,000 FY2011-.FY2017 -• , - Total ` $500,000 $500,000 Average Annual Capacity Expansion Expenditures(2) ' $50,000 $50,000 Average Annual' Popialationl3) `,; , ' 148,070 Capital Expansion Credit per Resident ' $0.34 (1) Source: Indian. River County (2) Average expenditure per year (3) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1 (4) •Average annual capacity expansion expenditures` (Item 2) divided by the average annual ;'r population -(Item 3) ' _ Net Libra ry' _ F acilities Impact, Cost The net impact•fee per residence is the difference between the cost component and the credit component.•.Table V40 summarizes the calculation of the net library impact cost per resident. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 54 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-10 Net Library Facilities Impact Cost Calculation Step J Impact Cost Revenue Credits Impact Cost Building and Land Cost per Resident (1) $141.38 - Library Materials Cost per Resident(�) $172.80 Library Equipment Cost per Resident(3) $1.99 Total Impact Cost 141 $316.17 Revenue Credit 1= ! Average Annual Capital Expansion Credit per,Residen'tlslN $0.34 Capitalization Rate 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) `` : , ' 25 Capital Expansion Credit per Resident: , $6.26 Net Impact Cost (7 ' 4 Net Impact Cost per Resident �•�,) �t- � -, $309.91 (1) Source. Table V-7 (2) Source Table V-8 (3) Source Table V-8 (4) The sum of building, land, materials, and equipment costs (Items 1, 2, and 3) (5) Source Table V-9.- =,' (6) Source: The present value of the capital'improvement-credit per functional resident (Item 2) at a.discount rate of,'ca2.5% with'a_pitalization period of 25 years. The discount rate was provided by IndianlRiver County; (7) TotaI impact cost per resident.(Item 4) less total credit per resident (Item 5) L SS. Calculated Library Facilities Impact.Fee Schedule The calculated,,library impact fee for"each residential land use is presented in Table V-11. The net impact'cost per resident calculated in the previous section is applied to the average persons per unit by land use. The resulting total impact fees per dwelling unit range from $391 for the multi-farnilyresidential land use to $785 for single family land use with 2,500 square feet or more space:] Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 55 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table V-11 Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule • ' Residents Net Cost per Impact , Residential Land Use per Unit Ill Resident(2) �, Fee(3) Residential Administrative lIr Total Impact i Fee(4) II Fee(5)I� Current i' Percent Adopted Fee(6) Changem , Single Family (less than 1,500sf) 2.05 $309.91 $635:+32 p• •: w,$15.88 $651.20 $440.75 47.7% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499 sf) 2.23 $309.91 , ` $691.10 x;:$17.28 $708.38 $495.08 43.1% Single Family (2,500 sf or greater) 2.47 $309.91 ' '$765.48 $19 14 $784.62 $537.10 46.1% Multi-Family/Accessory Unit 1.23 $309.91: `\$381.19 $9.53 $390.72 $292.13 33.7% Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) 1.44 $309.91 ``-$446.27 :'^, $11.16 $457.43 $357.73 27.9% (1) Source Appendix A, Table A-2 2) Source Table V-10 3) Residents per unit (Item 1) multiplied by net cost per resident•(Item 2) (4) Impact fee (Item 3) multiplied by 2.5% to calculate the administrative fee (5) Sum of the impact fee (Item 3) and the administrative fee (Item 4) w • (6) Source: Indian River County Fees shown include. a`2: 5% administrative;fee. (7) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 6) to.the total impact fee"(Iteni 5) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 56 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy Based on the data shown in Table V-9, the County uses approximately $50,000 per year of non -impact fee funding for library capacity projects. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure V-1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum impact fee calculated above. This level is considered the investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Given that the available non -impact fee funding for library capital facilities is very -limited, the County needs most of the impact fee (approximately 95 percent) to maintain the'adopted LOS standards used to calculate the impact fee. In addition, library impact'fees are'charged only to residential land uses and the County's primary focus at this time is to provide sdme`impact fee relief to non- residential land uses. 12095 10096 Figure V-1 "`\ Library Impact Fee` -.Affordable Growth Approach 8096 n 60% 40% — 20% Total Cost Maximum Impact Fee -- LOS Curve IRC,Average Annual Growth. ; 096 (10095 1.0096 2.00% 3.0096 4.00% 5.0096 6.00% 7.00% 8.0096 9.00% 10.0096 Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 57 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Upd Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-12 Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule — Affordable Growth Residential Land Use(2)I Residential Affordable 1 Growth Adoption j Total Impact 1 Fee IFeel31 1Rate(1) I Current i Adopted i , Percent Change(4) Single Famil (less than 1,500 sf) 96% $625.16 $440.75 41.8% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499sf) 96% $680.05 $495.08 37.4% Single Family (2,500sf or greater) 96% $753.23 $537 10 40.2% Multi-Family/Accesso Unit 96% $375.09 $292.13 28.4% Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) 96% $439.13 $357.73 22.8% (1) Calculated based on the average annual growth rate of 1 4% and non -impact fee funding of $50,000 per year. (2) Source: Calculated impact fee from Table V-11 multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County Fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee. (4) Percent change from the current adopted fee (Item 2).to the total impact fee (Item 1) Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison • As part of the work effort in updating Indian River -County's library impact fee program, a comparison of library facilities impact tfee schedules was completed for other Florida counties. Table V-13 presents this comparison. As presented, Indian River County's calculated fee is higher' than fees adopted bjr other Counties, which reflects the high investment:levels to the County's library facilities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 58 Impact Fee Update Study C— rV i J% • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table VI -1 Land & Buildings Inventory • Facility Description p Fire Station llsl Location(l) I 150001d Dixie Hwy, Vero Beach, FL32960 Year 1 Acquired/ Built(1) 1986 Number of Acres (1) =- n/a Square I Building Feet 1�1 Value(2) ; 10,418 $2,708,680 Land Value(3) n/a Total Building and Land Value(4) $2,708,680 Fire Station 2 3301 Bridge Plaza Dr, Vero Beach, FL32963 2007 p 0.92 'w" ;= 8,436 $2,193,360 $55,200 $2,248,560 Fire Station 3 290043rd Ave, Vero Beach, FL32960 2007 , . 2.72 :'0,-275 $2,411,500 $163,200 $2,574,700 Fire Station 4 15009th St SW, Vero Beach, FL32962 2007 , 2.18 7,440' $1,934,400 $130,800 $2,065,200 Fire Station 5 658001d Dixie Hwy, Vero Beach, FL32967 2007'•, 2.44 7,533 '.,- '-.$1,958,580 $146,400 $2,104,980 Fire Station 6 101 South A1A, Vero Beach, FL 32963 1986 . ..' 2.20 3,080 "' ::$800,800 $132,000 $932,800 Fire Station 7 121582nd Ave, Vero Beach, FL32966 .1986 0.50 3,136 '$815,360 $30,000 $845,360 Fire Station 8 1115 Barber St, Sebastian, FL32958 , ,.,1999., ^ 1.00 6,243 $1,623,180 $60,000 $1,683,180 Fire Station 9 1640 US 1, Sebastian, FL 32958 ', 2009... . 7.05 ,, 7,386 $1,920,360 $423,000 $2,343,360 Fire Station 10 62 North Broadway, Fellsmere,FL32948 r 1996 0.48.• ' ,._ 5,520 $1,435,200 $28,800 $1,464,000 Fire Station 11 2555 93rd St, Vero Beach, FL32963-._ `2001 , `1.51 v" 6,976 $1,813,760 $90,600 $1,904,360 Fire Station 12 362049th St, Vero Beach ;FL32967 2009' "" 4.00 ? 7,386 $1,920,360 $240,000 $2,160,360 TrainingTowera6l 4225 43rd Avenue, Vero Beach;,FL32967 2008 n/a 2,604 $390,600 n/a $390,600 Planned Station 13 44404th St, Vero Beach,fFL 329'68 \�, , ; .. FY08/09'.. `�, 3.21 n/a n/a $192,600 $192,600 Total area.:.!,'i;;;:;'(;;:ill, .,, , \ ,,28.21 85,433 $21,926,140 $1,692,600 $23,618,740 Building Value per Square Foot,,iTijP. " `'t i't',.'r. 7. , r' $257 11 .1,i� Land Value perAcre(B) .lNa„^,�.; ,1" ; L .. `~ $60,000 (1) Source: Indian River County 'i,4 71 k' lincni inra fnntmao nitinlicrli (n,lilra m .# ,�,�,11,t I, , CIA() fnr nrim Slni I t,ilrlinac 'nnr1' C1 S(1 fnr Trninina Tnuior hncorl nn roront rnnctru rtinn incu rnnro unli Inc infnrmmtinn (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) from other jurisdictions, and discusso'ns.with architects%contractors. Appendix F provides further detail Number of acres multiplied by land value per acre Meal) Sum of building value (Item 2) and land value (Item 3) it The County does not own, but leases the landlfor Stational As such, it is not included in the inventory Land associated with the building is included in'tlieli'nventory of public buildings, as part of the Emergency Operations Center. Total building value (Item 2) divided by square footage Land value is estimated at $60,000 per acre based on recent sales, vacant land values of parcels with similar size and/or location. See Appendix F for additional detail. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 61 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study O a Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In addition to land and buildings, the IRC emergency services inventory includes the necessary vehicles and equipment required to perform its services. As presented in Table VI -2, the total vehicle cost is approximately $15 million. Table VI -2 Vehicle Inventory and Values Description Ladder Truck Units" 2 Unit Cost") [Total Value(2) $800,000 $1,600,000 Brush Truck 8 $768,000 $193,000 $1,544,000 Dive Rescue Unit 1 / $130,000 $130,000 3,000 Gallon Tanker Truck 1 .' ,$150000 $150,000 Hazardous Materials Vehicle 1 : ,. ; ' $150,000 $150,000 Marine Fire Boat : 1 $117,600 $100,000 v'\ $100,000 Rigid Hull Inflatable Boat .1 , $653,100 $20,000 `�'. ,$20,000 Fire Engine x•.16- $292,068 $465,000 $7,440,000 Ambulance 17,, $12,000 $225;000 $3,825,000 Total . -•$14,959,000 (1) Source: Indian River County-,' (2) Units multiplied by unit'cost'• Table VI -3 presents the equipment invehttory and; related.costs for,Indian River County. Table' VI -3 A Equipment Inventory and Values Description Turnout Gear Units per Stational) i ;' •,15 Total Units ! (12 Stations)(2) I ' ' 180 Unit Costal) $2,150 Total Value(3) $387,000 Lifepack 2 .. 24 $32,000 $768,000 Radio.(portable) S`1; 60 $4,000 $240,000 Radio;(vehicle) 4 48 $4,000 $192,000 Stretcher'; ".", ' r 1 12 $13,000 $156,000 Thermal Imager- • . " i 1 12 $9,800 $117,600 MSA, Airbag - "' 5 60 $10,885 $653,100 Spreader, Ocutter, K12 1 12 $24,339 $292,068 Suction Unit 1 12 $1,000 $12,000 Total - $2,817,768 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Units per station multiplied by 12 (number of stations in Indian River County) (3) Unit cost multiplied by total units Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County 62 Impact Fee Update Study • 8 • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Service Area and Population Emergency services are provided by the County in the unincorporated areas and most municipalities. The Town of Indian River Shores, however, maintains its own fire department. Therefore, the proper benefit district for emergency services is the entire county excluding the Town of Indian River Shores. For impact fee calculations, the current 2013 countywide functional population estimate, excluding Indian River Shores, is used, which is provided in Appendix A, Table A-11. - Because simply using weighted population does not, fully.,address all of the benefactors of •emergency service, the "functional" weekly 24-hour population approach is used to establish a common unit of demand across different land uses'(See,Appendix A for further information). Level -of -Service ti Typically, level of service for emergency services is expressed in terms of stations per 1,000 residents. Using this method, IRC's current level of service '(LOS) is 1 station per 11,963 rY>. residents or 0.084 stations. per- 1,000 residents. The County's adopted LOS standard is 0.089 stations per 1,000 :residents.. Since the ,achieved LOS-- is lower than the adopted LOS standard, the achieved -.:LOS is used in the impact fee calculations. As mentioned in the previous sections; LOS needs<to. be measured using functional population to capture all residents_, .,worker`s," and visitors that benefit from emergency services. In terms of functional population;;_ LOS is calculated at 0:088 stations per 1,000 functional residents. Table VI=4;summarizes thecalculation,of the LOS standard using the 2013 population and functional population. The County has plansto add:two` stations over the next five years. This would result in a LOS of 0.095 stations 'per' -'1000 residents. However, since this LOS is not yet achieved, the existing LOS is used in theimpact fee calculations. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 63 Impact Fee Update Study • • e Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -4 Level -of -Service (2013 Calculation Step Population(1) Year 2013 Weighted Population ; 143,561 Functional Population 136,323 Number of Stations(2) 12 12 Population perStation(3) 11,963 11,360 LOS (Stations per 1,000 Residents)141 ' 0.084 0.088 Adopted LOSS (Stations per 1,000 Residents)(5) ; - - - 0.089 0.093 Future LOS: Population 2017111 "` 148,034 140,598 Future Number of Stations(6) r-'- ':" '14 . 14 Future Population perStationl'I 10,574 , \., 10,043 Future LOS (Stations per 1,000 Residents)($ '"-, 0.095 .' \0.100 (1) 2) Source. Table VI -1 • ` . 3) Population (Item 1) divided by the,number of stations (Item 2) 4) Number of stations (Item 2) divided the population (Item 1) divided by 1,000 5) Source Indian River County ' . „ 6) Source. Indian: River' County Capital Improvement Plan 7) 2017 population dividedby the future:number of stations (Item 6) 8) Future number of stations (Item 7) divided by the 2017 population multiplied by 1,000 Source Appendix A, Table'A-11. Figures exclude population of Indian River Shores. Table.VI-5 compares the levels of service for other Florida counties as well as the state of Florida.::The LOS is displayed in terms of permanent population for 2012 for the service area of'aII entities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 64 Impact Fee Update Study A Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -5 Level -of -Service Comparison Jurisdiction 1 Okeechobee County Service Area i Population 1; 2012 (1) ( ( ) 39,805 Number Stations(?) of i ; Residents per 13) Station(3) LOS (Stations) per 1,000 Residents)- -. 2 19,903 0.050 St. Lucie County 280,355 17 16,491 0.061 Hernando County 173,104 14 12,365 0.081 Osceola Count 180,821 16 ''"> 11,301 0.088 Indian River County 135,510 ,.' 12 r 11,293 0.089 Collier County 293,343 28;- 10,477 0.095 Citrus County 132,285 13 10,176 0.098 St. Johns County 176,128 18 ., '9,785 0.102 Charlotte County 146,373 r 17 '8;610 0.116 Martin County 128,332 `•� \. 15 ='; 8,555\ 0.117 Brevard Count 4q.:',-.205,690 31 6,635 `.) 0.151 Highlands County >`. -,-98,955 '21 4,712 0.212 (1) Source BEBR, 2012 final population estimates (2) Source" County websites and the U.S..''Fire Administration, NationalFire Department Census (3) Service area population (Item 1) divided,by_number of stations (Item:2)- , (4) Number of stations (Item 2) divided by the service, area population (Item 1) divided by 1,000 Cost Component Table AVI-6, summarizes the7total cur rent -value.. of land, buildings, and equipment for emergency services, including: - ,\ • Twelve.'stations with ,a `total asset value of $23.6 million for buildings and land and $17.8 million for vehiclesand equipment, for a total asset value of $41.4 million; and • An average value of $3.5'million per station. In addition, Table VI -6 presents the total impact cost per functional resident for emergency services in Indian River County, which is calculated by multiplying the net asset value per station by the LOS (stations per 1,000 functional residents) and dividing that figure by 1,000. The total impact cost for emergency services provided by the County is $304 per functional resident. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 65 Impact Fee Update Study • thik \© Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -6 iota! impact cost LDescription - -_ _ __ Building Value(1) Figure $21,926,140 Percent of Total Value 191 52.97% Land Value(2) $1,692,600 4.09% Vehicle Value(3) $14,959,000 36.14% Equipment Value) ` $2,817,768 6.81% Total Asset Value $41,395,508 100.01% Number of Stations(5) - ! 12 Cost per Station(6) , $3,449,626 LOS17i ' 0.088 Total Impact Cost per Resident(8) $303.57 1) Source: Table VI -1 (2) Source: Table VI -1 (3) Source Table VI -2 4) Source Table VI -3 5) Source' Table VI -1 • • t t. 6) Total asset value divided bytlie number of stations (Item 5) (7) Source: Table VI -4 (8) Cost per station (Item 6) multiplied by the LOS (Item 7) divided by 1,000 (9) Distribution ofbuilding, land, vehicle, and•equipment values • Credit Component To avoidovercharging new development1for the emergency services impact fee, a review of the capital financing program far emergency services was completed. The purpose of this c ? review as:to determine a vvany potentialre¢ revenue credits generated by new development that are being used:for expansiorof capital facilities, land, vehicles, and equipment included in the inventory. It should be noted that the credit component does not include any capital renovation, maintenance, orpperations expenses, as these types of expenditures cannot be funded with impact fee`revenue. Capital Expansion Expenditure Credit To calculate the capital expansion expenditure credit per functional resident, the historical capital expansion projects and those programmed in the CIP are reviewed. During the time period from 2008 through 2017, the County allocated an average annual non -impact fee funding of $757,000 toward emergency services capital facilities. The annual capital expansion expenditures were divided by the average functional residents for the same Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 66 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 67 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -9 Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC ' I Land Use 1. RESIDENTIAL: 11 i Impact I Unit - _. ' Functional II Resident I I 1 II Coefficient' Net Impact I Fee Irl J! Admin Feel" 1 Total Impact Fee) Fee_.- , Current i Adopted 1 Feel') �IChangel`I _ Fee Percent 210 Single Family Detached - Less than 1,500 sf du 1.43 5287.87 57.20 5295.07 5253.18 16.596 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 1.54 5310.02 57.75 $317.77 5284.95 11.S% - 2,500 sf or greater du 1.72 5346.25 58.66 $354.91 5308.53 15.0% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.87 5175.14 $4.38 5179.52 5180.40 -0.S% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 0.98 $197.28 54.93 $202.21 5186.55 8.4% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 0.65 5130.85 $3.27 5134.12 5164.00 -18.2% 320 Motel room 0.60 5120.79 53.02 5123.81 5164.00 -24.5% 252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 5185.21 $4.63 $189.84 5176.30 7.7% OFFICE& FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 1.14 $229.49 55.74 5235.23 $306.48 -23.2% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000sf 1.66 5334.17 58.35 $342.52 5306.48 11.8% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 2.23 5448.92 511.22 $460.14 $349.53 31.696 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 2.28 5458.99 $11.47 5470.46 $287.00 63.9% 710 General Office 1,000sf 1.00 5201.31 $5.03 5206.34 $252.15 -18.2% 760 Research& Development Center 1,000sf 0.85 5171.11 54.28 5175.39 5133.25 31.696. INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 0.50 5100.66 52.52 $103.18 590.20 14.4% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0.28 $56.37 $1.41 557.78 $69.70 -17.1% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 0.06 ' 512.08 50.30 512.38 513.33 -7.1% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 0.69 $138.90 53.47 $142.37 5123.00 15.7% n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55 5312.03 57.80 5319.83 5271.63 17.7% n/a Sand Mining acre 0.20 540.26 $1.01 $41.27 534.85 18.4% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 2.37 -' $477.10 $11.93 $489.03 5515.58 -5.1% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 1.91 ' 5334.50 59.61 5394.11 5310.58 26.996 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf - 1.47 5295.93 57.40 5303.33 5307.50 -1.4% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf - 6.78 51,364.88 534.12 $1,399.00 51,321.23 5.996 934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru , - 1,000 sf 8.90 51,791.66 $44.79 51,836.45 51,423.73 29.0% 850 Supermarket ' 1,000sf 2.05 541.2.69 510.32 $423.01 $365.93 15.696 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 1.50 5301.97 57.55 5309.52 5109.68 182.296 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 5175.14 54.38 $179.52 5340.30 -47.2% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 5.83 51,173.64 $29.34 $1,202.98 $764.65 57.3% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 0.23 $46.30 $1.16 $47.46 557.40 -17.3% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 1.08 5217.41 55.44 $222.85 $439.73 -49.3% 492 412 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 if 3.09 $622.05 $15.55 $637.60 5427.43 49.2% County Park acre 0.20 $40.26 51.01 $41.27 527.68 49.1% 491 Tennis Court court 3.16 $636.14 $15.90 $652.03 5418.20 55.9% 420 Marina berth .. 0.19 $38.25 $0.96 539.21 527.68 41.7% GOVERNMENTAL- _ 732 Post Office , ` - \ 1,003sf 1.62 $326.12 58.15 $334.27 5319.80 4.5% 590 Ubrary 1,000sf 1.76 $354.31 $8.86 5363.17 $309.55 17.396 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf 1.39 $279.82 $7.00 5286.82 5243.95 17.696 571 Jail -, bed 0.87 5175.14 $4.38 5179.52 5156.83 14.596 MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 0.89 5179.17 $4.48 $183.65 5181.43 1.296 610 Hospital 1,000sf 1.37 $275.79 56.89 5282.68 5281.88 0.3% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 2.54 5511.33 $12.78 5524.11 5294.18 78.296 560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 5102.67 $2.57 5105.24 596.35 9.2% 444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 $1,203.83 530.10 51,233.93 51,527.25 -19.2% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0.06 512.08 50.30 512.38 517.43 -29.096 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0.07 514.09 50.35 $14.44 517.43 -17.2% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0.08 516.10 50.40 516.50 521.53 -23.4% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 520.13 $0.50 520.63 $18.45 11.8% (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-14 for residential land uses and A-15 for non-residential land uses (2) Source: Net impact cost per resident from Table VI -8 multiplied by the functional resident coefficient (Item 1) (3) Source: Calculated at 2.5% based on the current fee (4) Sum of the net impact fee (Item 2) and the administrative fee (Item 3) (5) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee. (6) Percent change from the current adopted fee (Item 5) to the total impact fee (Item 4) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 71 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy In the case of emergency services, based on a review of capital expansion expenditures between 2008 and 2017, the County uses approximately $757,000 per year of non -impact fee funding. During the next 25 years, the County is expected to grow at an annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure VI -1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum calculated impact fee. This level is compared investment, needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of emergency services impact fee calculated, only approximately 8 percent of this amount is needed to maintain the current/achieved LOS due to non -impact fee contributions from the existing development and low rate of population growth. If the impact' fee is adopted'at a level higher than 8 percent, the LOS is likely to improve 'as long as the County 'continues to spend approximately $757,000 of non -impact fee revenues per year toward capacity projects. In addition, if the County would like to.charge no feeto .non-residential land'uses, it can do so and still maintain the existing LOS,as long as the fee•for`residential land uses is adopted at 11 percent. 16095 140% 12096 10096 80% ~ 60% 4096 20% 096 'Figure V,1-1' , •Emergency Services. Impact Fee -Affordable Growth Approach 0.0096 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.0096 7.00% 8.0096 9.00% 10.0096 Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 72 Impact Fee Update Study • IRC -Average Annual •Groinith% I 1 1 1 i Total Cost • Maximumimpact=Fee 1 LOS Curve 1 0.0096 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.0096 7.00% 8.0096 9.00% 10.0096 Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 72 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study period in order to calculate the average capital expansion cost per functional resident. Although the County used some sales tax revenues toward emergency services capacity projects, because this amount was insignificant (less than 1 percent of non -impact fee spending), a separate credit for sales tax revenues was not calculated. As presented in Table VI -7, the result is an average annual expansion cost of $5.55 per functional resident. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 67 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table VI -7 Capacity Expansion Projects • Expenditure) Emergency Services District Fund FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Total Fiber Optics $13,097 - - - .:=: : ";, - - - - - 513,097 EOCTrainingCenter $610,801 - - - - `^:- - - - - 5610,801 Fire Station 12 540,231 51,980,929 559,514 - , ,` -'; ,� - - - - $2,080,674 Fire Station 13 - - - - $426,304 '-'7:$426,304 - - - 5852,608 Fire Station 14 _ . \ - $200,000 $1,600,000 - $1,800,000 Med Unit - - - • - , - $225,000 - 5225,000 - - $450,000 Fire Pumper - - - .' ;`, - ,,, - $457;000 ,, - $457,000 - $914,000 One Quint (Fire Apparatus) - - - - - ,• - - » - $800,000 - 5800,000 Optional Sales Tax Revenues Fire Station 12 547,209 - - - - - - •' - - $47,209 Emergency Services District Fund and Optional Sales Tax Revenues Total Capital Expansion Expenditures $711,338 $1,980,929 $59,5141 • - - '- $651,304 $883,304 $425,000 $2,857,000 - 57,568,389 Average Annual Capital Expansion Expenditures(2) , •u $756,839 Average Functional Populationl3l. , ~ , , •,, 136,435 Capital Expansion Expenditures per Functional Residentl4ll `- , ,$5.55 (1) (2) Total capital expansion expenditures divided„byJ0 , (3) Source: Appendix A, Table A-11 (4) Average annual capital expansion,expen,ditures (Item•2).divided by average functional population (Item 3) ijls'I „}' , :.1 '1.a1 1i.if•• 1-1 Source: Indian River County '11111 fii.l Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 68 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Emergency Services Impact Cost The net impact fee per functional resident is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table VI -8 summarizes the calculation of the net emergency services impact cost per functional resident. The first section of this table identifies the total impact cost as $304 per functional resident. The second section of the table identifies the revenue credits for the emergency services impact fee totaling approximately $102 per functional res dent which is equal to the net present value of the capital expansion credit per functional resident. The net impact cost per functional resident is-the;difference between the total impact cost and the total revenue credit. This results in7a net impact cost` of ;$201 per functional resident. - `,Table VI -8 Net Impact Cost perFunctional Resident - — 1 Impact Cost / Credit Element 1 Impact Cost z - - Impact Cost Revenue Credits Total Impact Cost pe•r,Functional 'Res'ident(1) $303.57 Revenue Credit Avg Annual Capital' Improvement Credit:pe? Functional Resident12l $5.55 -' Capitalization Rate--‘,..:- \,. 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) �4. 25 Capital Improvement Credit per Resid`ent_(3), $102.26 Net Impact Costs_ . _ Net Impact Cost per`Functional Resident(4) $201.31 (1) Source: Table VI -6 (2) Source: Table VI -7 (3) Average annual capital improvement credit per functional resident (Item 2) over a capitalization rate of 2.5% for 25 years. The capitalization rate estimate is provided by Indian River County (4) Total impact cost per functional resident (Item 1) less the total revenue credit per functional resident (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 69 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule • Table VI -9 presents the calculated emergency services impact fee schedule developed for Indian River County for both residential and non-residential land uses, based on the net impact cost per functional resident previously presented in Table VI -8. The table also includes a comparison to the current/adopted fees. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 70 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -30 Calculated Emergency Services Irnpact Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth ITE LUC Land Use RESIDENTIAL i Impact Unit Affordable Growth Adoption Rate Irl Total Impact Fee(2) Current Adopted Fee(3) Percent Changel'I 210 Single Family. Detached - Less than 1,500sf du 11% $32.46 $253.18 -87.2% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 11% $34.95 $284.95 -87 7% - 2,500 sf or greater du 11% $39.04 5308.53 -87.3% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 11% $19.75 $180.40 -89.1% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 11% 522.24 $186.55 -88.1% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: •- 310 Hotel room 0% $0.00 $164.00 -100.0% 320 Motel room 0% $0.00 $164.00 -100.0% 252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0% $0.00 $176.30 -100.0% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $306.48 -100.0% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $306.48 -100.0% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $349.53 -100.0% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $287.00 -100.0% 710 General Office 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $252.15 -100.0% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000sf.- 0% $0.00 $133.25 -100.0% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing r 1,000 sf ;,', 0% $0.00 $90.20 -100.0% 150 Warehousing - 1,000sf 0% 50.00 $69.70 -100.0% 151 Mini -Warehouse - 1,00Osf '0% $0.00 513.33 -100.0% 110 General Light Industrial 1,00Osf 0% $0.00 5123.00 -100.0% n/a Concrete Plant acre ,' . 0% $0.00 $271.63 -100.0% n/a Sand Mining acre 0% 50.00 $34.85 -100.0% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000sfgla> 0% 50.00 $515.58 -100.0% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. '. 0% 50.00 $310.58 -100.0% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf ; 0% $0.00 $307.50 -100.0% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf ''-:. 0% $0.00 51,321.23 -100.0% 934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru s 1,000 sf 0% $0.00 $1,423.73 -100.0% 850 Supermarket ., 1,000sf 0% 50.00 5365.93 -100.0% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop - - 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $109.68 -100.0% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0% $0.00 $340.30 -100.0% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps -- - 1,000 sf 0% $0.00 $764.65 -100.0% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 0% $0.00 $57.40 -100.0% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 0% $0.00 $439.73 -100.0% 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 0% $0.00 $42743 -100.0% 412 County Park acre 0% $0.00 $27.68 -100.0% 491 Tennis Court court 0% $0.00 $418.20 -100.0% 420 Marina '- berth 0% $0.00 $27.68 -100.0% GOVERNMENTAL: . 732 Post Office 1,000 sf 0% 50.00 5319.80 -100.0% 590 Library 1,000sf 0% $0.00 5309.55 -100.0% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf 0% 50.00 $243.95 -100.0% 571 Jail bed 0% 50.00 $156.83 -100.0% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,00Osf 0% $0.00 $181.43 -100.0% 610 Hospital 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $281.88 -100.0% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $294.18 -100.0% 560 Church 1,000sf 0% $0.00 $96.35 -100.0% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 0% $0.00 $1,527.25 -100.0% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0% $0.00 $1743 -100.0% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0% $0.00 $17 43 -100.0% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0% 50.00 $21.53 -100.0% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0% $0.00 $18.45 -100.0% (1) Based on annual growth rate of 1.4% and non -impact fee spending of $757,000 per year (2) Source: Calculated 100% impact fee from Table VI -9 multiplied by affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1 (3) Source: Indian River County; fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee. (4) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 3) to the total impact fee (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 73 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's emergency services impact fee program, a comparison of impact fee schedules was completed for other Florida counties. Table VI -11 presents this comparison. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 74 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table VI -10 Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison • -- -1 ll Land Use II Unitl' Date of Last U. date — - Indian - - River County -- -,�- Affordable Growth(3) 2013 - - 1 Brevard I County Isl 2000 Okeechobee County lel 2012 St. Lucie County pl 2009 Osceola County lel 2006 Charlotte County Ivl 2009 I Citrus Countyuol 2010 Collier uq County 2010 Hernando na County 2005 Highlands nal County 2006 I- Martin n<I County 2012 - St. Johns psi County 2011 1�r Calculated I 2013 Existing WI 2005 Ado tion Percenta:e 10056 n/a 10056 100% 100% 10056 100% 10056 50% 100% 10096 100% 10056 10056 Residential: Sin le Famil 2,000sf du 5318 535 5285 593 5394 5557 5165 5183 5393 $94 $235 5759 5599 5690 Non -Residential: - Li:htIndustrial 1,000sf 5142 50 5123 n/a 582 $74 $50 563 $90 546 $84 $331 512 518 Office 50,000s.ft 1,000sf 5206 50 5252 544 5191 5329 590 5115 5226 595 5171 5800 580 5216 Retail 100,000s.ft 1,000sf 5489 50 5516 5207 5408 5517 • 5300 , 5176 $455 5165 5334 51,121 5319 5125 Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 5470 50 5287 5105 5408 ,15517 5300 5250 5455 5153 5328 51,136 $80 $49 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 51,836 50 $1,424 5552 5408 rl{i5517 51,390 '-. \ 5715 $455 $603 5510 54,317 5575 5109 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table VI -9 (3) Source: Table VI -10 (4) Source: Indian River County Fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee. \ ` • (5) Source: Brevard County Planning & Development Department; Fire/Rescue and EMS rates are combined; Industrial larid:used are exempt from impact fees (6) Source: Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners Administration Department„ �...,`,:: (7) Source: St. Lucie County Planning &Development Services Department; Fees have been increased to above rates through annual. indexing (8) Source: Osceola County Community Development Department .`i =. ".- ,; f r (9) Source: Charlotte County Planning & Land Development Department. In Charlotte, bank w/drive-thru is charged "per lane" Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended (10) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department `1(!l' (11) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department; EMS rates only; Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing (12) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department; Fire and EMS rates are combined (13) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28; Fire/Rescue and EMS rates are combined; Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30, 2014 (14) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department (15) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department; Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 75 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study VII. Law Enforcement Law enforcement impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of police service related land, facilities and capital equipment required to support the additional law enforcement service demand created by new growth. This section of the report presents the results of the law enforcement impact fee update study for Indian River County and will serve as the technical support docurfient for the calculated law enforcement impact fee schedule. f!, There are several major elements associated with the development of the law enforcement impact fee. These include: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Law Enforcement Impact -Cost • Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule- • Affordable Growth Strategy • Law Enforcement Impact =Fee Schedule Comparison Facility Inventory According` to ormaprovided b' inftion ythe IRC Sheriff's Office (IRCSO) and the County, Indian \-• - I River County,,has 68,000 square feet of building space and almost 13 acres of land associated with law.enforcerrient services. Table VII -1 presents this information. Building value is estimated/based on recent construction, insurance values of existing buildings, and information from other Florida jurisdictions. Land value is based on the value of parcels where existing buildings are located and an analysis of vacant land sales and values. Additional information is provided in Appendix F. It should be noted that, in addition to these buildings, IRCSO leases several buildings to accommodate substations and storage facilities. For the purposes of this impact fee study, the inventory includes only the space owned by the County. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 76 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table VII -1 Land and Building Inventory • 11 Facility Description Primary Buildings: Year i Acquired/ Built(1) i it ,, Total Square lr Number of '1 Square r I 11 Footage on Acres( 1� Feet1�1 Site(2) ,_ '"2 Allocated Acreage(3) Building Value(4) Land Value(s) l Total Building: and Land Value(6) Sheriff's Administration Building 1988 33,332 '�cti;' , 6.88 $6,666,400 5344,000 $7,010,400 Sheriff's Fleet Compound 1988 ;2.03 $1,971,200 $101,500 $2,072,700 General Services Building N/A 9.81 \9,856 2,100 47,552 '10:43 , $420,000 $21,500 $441,500 Sheriffs Crime Scene Evidence Addition 20031,000 0.21 ":.=:-. ,, $200,000 $10,500 $210,500 Courthouse Security N/A I (7 N/A- . 587 ' • 122,501 % N/A ';$117,400 N/A $117,400 Courthouse Civil Process N/A .1,914 N/A $382,800 N/A $382,800 SunSky Office Space 2011 2.75 ' '.4,920. ,, 18,146 0.75 $984,000 $37,500 $1,021,500 Crime Scene Building 2013 .._ ,, 13,226 ., 2.00 $2,645,200 $100,000 $2,745,200 Miscellaneous Support Buildings On -Site: ; , , ',! Base (' N/A ' 9 81 ' '264 - , 4,552 0.05 $13,200 $2,500 $15,700 Storage Bldg/Maintenance Shed N/A . 1,000 0.21 $50,000 $10,500 $60,500 Total -' 68,199 12.56 $13,450,200 $628,000 $14,078,200 Building Value per Square FootTid Ili ; i, `t?, \:' $197 Land Value per Acre(9) 43-1:11, $50,000 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Source: Indian River County, `,Tp, ',' e iY .1 Represents square footage of'allibuildings on the associated acreage (whether law enforcement -related or not) Number of acres divided by the total square footage on-site, multiplied by square footage Calculated based on $200 per squaretfoot for primary buildings and $50 per square foot for support buildings Allocated acreage (Item 3) multiplied bylIand value per acre (Item 9) Sum of building and land values (Items 4 a'ndj5)` t. `i Acreage included in the public buildings impact,fee calculations Total building value divided by total square footaget.t> Estimated based on value of current parcels, a review of recent sales and vacant land values of parcels with similar size and location Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County 77 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In addition to the land and buildings inventory, the IRCSO also has the vehicles and equipment to perform its law enforcement duties. Table IV -2 summarizes the equipment and vehicle inventory. Table VII -2 Equipment and Vehicle Invento I — —Unit Equipment Vehicles Units(1) 281 Value $13,347 Total Value(1) $3,750,435 Vehicle/Radio Equipment 1,577 $1,523 $2,401,999 Weapons 450 • $535 $240,733 Office Equipment - -. '1 $148,292 `•., $148,292 Specialty Vehicles/Equipment' 2 $65,266 \ $130,532 Electronic Equipment . . 1 $196,760 -, $196,760 Computer Equipment ~ ', s\,1 $1,604,426 $1,604;426 Misc. Equipment 41 's"'' $896,490 $890,490 911 Center Equipment = ,: ; ... ;;` 76 ` "' $7,723 $586,930 Total Equipment Value , $9,950,597 (1) Source: Indian River County ; , ti - (2) Calculated by dividing the total value by number of units Service Area and Population Law enforcement "services,, service`s are provided Eby the sIRCSO in the unincorporated areas of the County.�. Municipalities -within IRC have -their-own police departments. Therefore, the proper,benefit district for law enforcement is the unincorporated county and weighted seasonal population for unincorporated icounty is used in the impact fee calculations. In addition, becaus`e.law enforcement services are provided to all land uses and all residents, visitors, and workers,,the "functional" population for unincorporated county is calculated and used as well. Appendb A -provides further information on population estimates. Level -of -Service Based on the information provided by the County, the Indian River County's 2013 level -of - service is 1.89 law enforcement officers per 1,000 weighted residents. The County's adopted LOS standard is 2.09 officers per 1,000 residents. Table VII -3 presents this information. Given that the achieved LOS is lower than the adopted LOS standard and new Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 78 Impact Fee Update Study • s • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study development cannot be charged for a higher LOS than what is being provided, the achieved LOS is used in the impact fee calculations. The County does not have any new law enforcement capital facilities programmed in the Five -Year CIP; however, the Sheriff's Master Plan identifies needs for additional administrative space and a crime scene investigation unit. The estimated cost for this project is $25 million to $30 million. Due to lack of funding, this project is not yet programmed. Since the timing of this project is not known yet, a future LOS estimate is not calculated. While the 2013 LOS is 1.89 officers per 1,000 weighted residents, in order to calculate the law enforcement facilities impact fee, the LOS needs to be calculated in terms of officers per 1,000 functional residents. Table VII -3 also illustrates the calculat oro f the current LOS using the total functional residents within'the service area. The current LOS of law enforcement facilities is 2.11 officers per 1,000 functional residents. Table -V11-3 Levehof-Service-(2013) Component LOS•(officers-per 1,000 residents)(3 Adopted LOS Standard..(officers-per 1,000 residents)(4) Year 2013 Weighted Population 97,681 185 1.89 2.09 Functional Population 87,590 185 2.11 2.33 (1);s Source: AppendixA,Table A-14.or weighted population and Table A-11 for functional population, 'Unincorporated population ;. (2) Source:Indian River County Sheriff's Office (3) Number of officer (Item 2) divided by the population (Item 1) multiplied by 1,000 (4) Source Indian River County Table VII -4 summarizes'a:LOS comparison between Indian River County and other Florida counties. The LOS is displayed in terms of permanent population for all jurisdictions because a functional population analysis has not been completed for these entities. The LOS comparison is based on the permanent population for 2012, as this is the most recent population data available for all jurisdictions. As presented in this table, the Indian River County's LOS is on the high end of these other communities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 79 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -4 Level -of -Service Comparison Jurisdiction Collier County Service Area Population (2012) (1) 293,744 j Number of Officers(1) 270 LOS (Officers per 1,000 Residents) (Z) 0.92 St. Johns County 176,721 219 1.24 Highlands County 77,041 99 1.29 Charlotte County 146,373 -' , 189 1.29 Citrus County 140,761 181 1.29 Hernando County 165,402 • , . 216 1.31 Okeechobee County 34;227. ' ., \., 47 1.37 Martin County 128,656 :._x'183 1.42 St. Lucie County ;71;457 137 . 1.92 Osceola County - e./180,821 358 , `�, 1.98 Indian River County (Existing) ' ;.. °Z92,795 185 '�- 1.99 Brevard County 223;781 / 474 '`;_2.12 1) Source: Indian River County"an`d-Florida Departmer t.of Law Enforcement Criminal Justice Agency Profile Report, 2012 • (2) Permanent population (Item'1)'divided by.the number of officers (Item 2) divided by 1,000 Cost Component The cost component of'the study evaluates the, cost of capital items, including buildings, land, vehicles, and equipment Table VII -5 provides a summary of all capital costs, which amounts to' approximately $130;000 per svvorn-law'enforcement officer. Table VII-Salso presents`the'.cost'per:functional resident for the impact fee analysis. This cost was calculated as the total`capital cost of approximately $130,000 per officer multiplied by the LOS of 211 -`officers per 1,000 functional residents divided by 1,000. As shown in the following table, the -':total' impact cost per resident is approximately $274 for law enforcement facilities Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 80 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -5 Unit Cost per Functional Resident Component I Building Value(1) Cost ; $13,450,200 Percent of Total Value ) 55.98% Land Value(2) $628,000 2.61% Vehicle and Equipment Value(3) $9,950,597 41.41% Total Asset Value14) -:$24,028,797 100.00% Number of Officers(5) 185 Total Asset Value per Officer(6) ,/' s.. `�$129,885 Level -of -Service (Officers/1,000 Functional Reidents)17I �ti, 2.11 Cost per Functional Resident(8) ;1 $274.06 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Source: Table VII -1 Source. Table VII -1 Source. Table VII -2 Sum of building value (Item 1); land value (Item 2), andvehicle/equipment value (Item 3) Source Table VII -3 (6) Total asset value (Item 4) divided by number of officers (Item,$) (7) Source: Table VII -3 (8) Total asset value per officer (Item 6) multiplied.by the LOS (Item 7) divided by 1,000 Credit Component' A review of.;historical expenditures as well as_'projects programmed in the Five -Year CIP suggested that', there were no non -impact fee, funding used toward capacity projects between"2008 and 2017: -As such,.a credit for nonimpact fee funding is not needed.• •4 - Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost • Given that there is :no credit, net law enforcement impact cost is $274 per resident, as shown previously in Table -VII -S: r. Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule A law enforcement impact fee schedule was developed for residential and non-residential land uses and is illustrated in Table VII -6. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 81 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -6 Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC Land Use RESIDENTIAL ! Impact Unit i 24 -Hour Functional Resident Coefficient"' Fee per Functional Resident I,I I Admin Feel" Total Impact Fee Current Adopted Fee_"' Fee ! nt it 1 ChangePercel`l 210 Single Family Detached - Less than 1,500sf du L43 $391.91 59.80 $401.71 $223.45 79.8% - 1,500 to 2,499sf du 1.55 $424.79 $10.62 $435.41 $251.13 73.4% - 2,500 sf or greater du 1.73 $474.12 $11.85 $485.97 5271.63 78.996 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.89 $243.91 $6.10 $250.01 5151.70 64.8% 240 Mobile Home / RV (Tied Down) du 0.89 $243.91 $6.10 $250.01 $161.95 54.4% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 0.65 $178.14 $4.45 5182.59 $143.50 27.2% 320 Motel room 0.60 $164.44 $4.11 $168.55 5143.50 17.5% 252/620 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Horne bed 0.92 $252.14 $6.30 5258.44 $154.78 67.0% OFFICE& FINANCIAL 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 1.14 $312.43 $7.81 5320.24 $268.55 19.2% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,030sf 1,000sf 1.66 $454.94 511.37 $466.31 $268.55 73.6% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 2.23 $611.15 $15.28 $626.43 5306.48 104.4% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 2.28 5624.86 $15.62 $640.48 $251.13 155.0% 710 General Office 1,000sf 1.00 5274.06 $6.85 5280.91 $221.40 26.9% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 0.85 $232.95 $5.82 5238.77 $116.85 104.396 INDUSTRIAL 140 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 0.50 $137.03 53.43 5140.46 $78.93 78.0% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0.28 $76.74 $1.92 $78.66 560.48 30.1% 151 Mini-Warehouse/Storage 1,000sf 0.06. $16.44 $0.41 $16.85 $12.30 37.0% 110 General Light Industrial 1,030 sf 0.69 $189.10 $4.73 $193.83 $107.63 80.1% n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55\ $424.79 $10.62 $435.41 $237.80 83.1% n/a Sand Mining acre 0.20 ' 554.81 $1.37 556.18 530.75 82.7% RETAIL 820 Retail 1,000 sfgla 2.37 $649.52 $16.24 $665.76 $452.03 47.396 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 1.91 $523.45 $13.09 $536.54 $271.63 97.596 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf L47 , $402.87 510.07 $412.94 $269.58 53.2% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 6.78 51,858.13 $46.45 51,904.58 $1,157.23 64.6% 934 Fast Food Rest w/ Drive-Thru ' .1,000 sf 8.90 $2,439.13 $60.98 $2,500.11 $1,247.43 100.4% 850 Supermarket ' 1,000sf 2.05 $561.82 $14.05 $575.87 $320.83 79.5% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 1.50. $411.09 $10.28 $421.37 $116.85 260.696 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 $238.43 $5.96 5244.39 $298.28 -18.1% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 5.83 $1,597.77 $39.94 $1,637.71 $669.33 144.756 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf - 0.23 ' $63.03 $1.58 $64.61 $50.23 28.6% RECREATIONAL 430 Golf Course hole 1.08 $295.98 $7.40 $303.38 5385.40 -21.3% 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 3.09 $846.85 $21.17 $868.02 $375.15 131.4% 412 County Park acre 0.20 554.81 $1.37 $56.18 $23.58 138.3% 491 Tennis Court court . 3.16 $866.03 521.65 $887.68 $365.93 142.6% 420 Marina - berth 0.19 $52.07 $1.30 $53.37 $24.60 117.0% GOVERNMENTAL 732 Post Office 1,030 sf L62 $443.98 $11.10 $455.08 $279.83 62.6% 590 Library 1,000sf L76 $482.35 $12.06 $494.41 $271.63 82.0% 733 Government Office Complex r 1,000sf L39 $380.94 $9.52 5390.46 $214.23 82.396 571 Jail • N, bed 0.87 $238.43 $5.96 $244.39 5137.35 77.9% MISCEUANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 0.89 $243.91 $6.10 5250.01 $158.88 57.4% 610 Hospital 1,000sf L37 $375.46 $9.39 $384.85 $247.03 55.8% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 2.54 $696.11 $17.40 $713.51 $257.28 177.316 560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 $139.77 $3.49 $143.26 $84.05 70.4% 444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 $1,638.88 $40.97 $1,679.85 $1,337.63 25.696 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0.06 516.44 $0.41 516.85 $14.35 17.4% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0.07 $19.18 50.48 519.66 514.35 37.0% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0.08 $21.92 $0.55 $22.47 $18.45 21.8% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 $27.41 $0.69 $28.10 $16.40 71.396 n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf 0.63 $172.66 $4.32 $176.98 $99.43 78.0% Note: gsf = gross square feet (1) Source: Functional resident coefficients from Appendix A, Table A-13 for residential and lodg ng land uses and Table A-15 for non-residential land uses (2) Calculated impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost per functional resident Table VII -5) by the functional resident coefficient (Item 1) for each land use (3) Fee per functional resident unit (Item 2) multiplied by 2.5% to determine the administrative fee (4) Sum of the fee per functional resident (Item 2) and the administrative fee (Item 3) (5) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee. (6) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 5) to the total impact fee (Item 4) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 82 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy Currently, it appears that the only funding source available for law enforcement capital facilities is the impact fee. As such, unless another revenue source is identified, any reduction in the impact fee will result in a decline in the LOS. In addition, the current achieved LOS is lower than the adopted LOS standard. As mentioned previously, the Sheriff's Master Plan identifies two projects that are estimated to cost approximately $25 million to $35 million. These projects are not yet programmed due to lack of funding. Given these, the policy decision should focus on the LOS,and whether the adopted and/or existing LOS should be reduced or impact fees and/or/other revenue sources should be used to maintain/improve the LOS. Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian RiveriCounty's law enforcement impact fee schedule, the County's calculated impact fee schedule was compared to the adopted fee schedule and those in similar or nearbyjurisdictions. Table VII -7 presents this comparison. 1 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 83 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -7 Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Land Use Date of Last Update ' Unit' Indian River _ 3 e-- —�—i Calculated 2013 County __ f-— _= _I31 Existing 2005 St. Lucie County(4) 2009 Charlotte County(5) 2009 Citrus County(6) 2010 Collier County(7) 2010 Hernando County(8) 2005 Highlands CountyIsl 2006 Martin County") 2012 St. Johns 1 Countylul 2011 Adoption Percentage 100% 100% 1005x% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Residential: Single Family (2,000sf) du $43511 $2511 $2061 $831 5290 $4491 $86 5230 $7601 584 Non -Residential: . Light Industrial 1,000sf 5194 5108 $48 $29 566 5149 531 n/a 5158 530 Office (50,000sgft) 1,000sf $281 $221 5317 552 5166 $307 $62 n/a 5274 $89 Retail (100,000sgft) 1,000sf 5666 5452 $351 $81 .% ' $335 5531 5121 n/a $742 $171 Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 5640 $251 $305 ,II$113 $335. 5492 5121 n/a 5481 $67 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 52,500 $1,247 $305 ,4(IO($324 $335. "-, $1,946 5187 n/a 52,757 $150 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table VII -6 (3) Source: Indian River County Fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee. • (4) Source: St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing (5) Source: Charlotte County Planning & Land Development Department. In Charlotte, bank.w/drive-thru is'charged "per lane` Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are • "",'E currently suspended (6)' Citrus County Planning & Development Department (7) Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department; Fees have been reduced to abdve: rates throughannual indexing (8) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department' (9) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28; Impact fee'moratorium in effect through June 30,2014 (10) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department (11) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 84 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study VIII. Educational Facilities Educational facilities impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of land, facilities and capital equipment required to support the additional school facilities demand created by new growth. This section of the report will present the results of the educational facilities impact fee update study for Indian River County and will serve as the technical support document for the calculated school impactfee schedule. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 85 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study IX. Parks & Recreation Facilities This section discusses the analysis used in the development of the parks and recreation impact fee. To develop the proposed parks and recreation impact fee schedule, multiple elements must be addressed, including: • Inventory of Land and Recreation Facilities • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Calculated Parks & Recreation Facilities`Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Parks & Recreation Facilities. Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Net Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Cost These various elements are summarized throughout this section, with the result being the proposed parks and recreation impact fee,schedule. Inventory of Land 'and Recreation.Facilities' s. According to information ,provided --by IRC, the County owns 29 parks located in the unincorporated county.' In addition, there are five parks where the land is not owned by the County,: but the facilities. are. As such, only the facilities in these parks are included in the inventory:.Parks that are owned by the' County, but located in cities are excluded since the impact fee is.collected only in the unincorporated county. Finally, recreation facilities that generate revenue;(such as golf_ courses and the shooting range) are also excluded from the inventory. IRC parksFand,recre'ational facilities can be classified into three different types, depending on the population and areas they serve and types of amenities offered. The Recreation and Open Space Element of the County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan includes definitions of each park type. Table IX -1 provides the parks and recreation inventory used as the basis for the impact fee. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 86 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -1 Indian River County Parks & Recreation Facilities Inventory 40 Name of the Park/Facility 45'Street Dock Total Acreage g 1.00 Ownership County Class R Basketball Court Boat Ram P Canoe Launch Community Center Dune Walkover Fishing Pier 1 logging Trails (mils) Lifeguard Tower Maintenance Facilit y Multi -Purpose Buildin sf C( ( Olympic Aquatic . Center Picnic Pavilion Play- ground Res[rooms Soccer Field Softball Field Swimming Pool Tennis Courts Volleyball Court Ambersand Beach Park 0.30 County R 1 Blue Cypress Lake Park 10.00 County R 2 1 1 1 Boat Island 5.00 FINDIt1 R 4 1 C-54Stick Marsh Reveation Area 4.56 SJRWMD10 R 4 1 1 2 CR -512 Recreation Area 6.00 SJRWMDItI R 2 1 2 1 Dale Wimbrow Park 27.25 County R 1 0.50 3 1 1 Donald MacDonald Park 27.25 County R 1 1 0.50 2,500 1 1 Gifford Park 38.96 County R 2 6,006 1.00 1,400 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 Golden Sands Park 14.30 County R 1 1 4 1 1 Grovenor Estates Park 4.65 County N . t .4 Helen Hanson Park 2.00 County N rl III , '\ 1 1 1 Hosie -Schumann Park 2.00 County N 1 ill f \ 1 IRC Fairgrounds 137.92 County R 0,25 70000 3 1 IRC Parks Maintenance Facility N/A County R \ 8,850 IRC Shooting Range 80.00 State R \ ./ 1,500• 1 Joe S. Farman Park 1.00 County R •. 1 2 Kiwanis-Moban Park 71.43 County R 1 ._ S. "'^.,.::.- 1.00 7 3 2 2 MU( Park 5.84 County N 'T.': . . . 1 North County Regional Park 155.00 State R s 0.50 - 400 1 1 1 4 Oslo Road Boat Ramp 0.30 County R 1 - ,., 'iii) Pine Hill (Lone Pine) 0.50 County N 1 W, . ,. .... 1 Roseland Community Center 2.00 County N 1,401 1' - 1 1 Round Island Beach Park 9,36 County 8 1 0.25 1 6 1 1 Round Island Park West 17.00 County R 2 1 1 ' 0.25 1 1 1 Sebastian Canoe Launch Park 1.03 County C .1 v.77 1 South County Regional Park 72.70 County R 2 1.00 800 10 1 3 4 4 2 Tracking Station Beach 5.50 County R 1 1 1 Treasure Shores Park (North Beach Complex) 17.00 County R 1 0.25 1 1 1 Wabasso Beach Park 1.00 County R 2 1 2 1 Wabasso Causeway Park 5.00 County R 3 2 2 7 1 Wabasso Island River Park 54.00 County 8 2 1 1 3 1 Wabasso School Park 7.36 County N 1 , ' 1 West Wabasso Park 10.00 County N 2 \ 1.00 3 1 1 1 1 1 Total (County Owned) 10 18 5 7407 7 15 6.50 5 8,850 76,600 1 59 13 32 6 14 1 5 4 Summary of Parks 8 Recreation facilities Total Acre a Basketball Court Boat Ramp Canoe Launch Community Center Dune Walkover Fishing Pier logging Trails (miles) lifeguard Maintenance Facility Multi -Purpose Buildin Building ) Olympic ARuatic AquaticFacili Center Picnic Pavilion Play- ground Reztrooms Soccer Field Softball Field Swimming Pool Tennis Courts Volleyball Court Neighborhood Parks 34.35 5 0 0 1,401 0 1 1.0 0 0 0 0 4 5 4 0 2 0 1 1 Community Parks 1.03 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Regional Parks 511.27 5 18 4 6,006 7 14 5.5 5 8,850 76,600 1 54 8 28 6 12 1 4 3 TOTAL 546.65 10 18 5 7,407 7 15 6.50 5 8,850 76,600 1 59 13 32 6 14 1 5 4 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Florida Inland Navigation District (3) St. John's River Water Management District Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 87 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Service Area and Population IRC provides parks and recreation facilities and services in the unincorporated areas of the county. The municipalities provide these facilities and services within their respective jurisdictions. As a result, the parks and recreation impact fee analysis will consider only unincorporated county area population and parks and recreational facilities located within the unincorporated county area. Appendix A, Table A-1, provides the estimated unincorporated area population for 2013 and the projected/unincorporated area population through 2040. Parks impact fees are charged only to residential land uses. As such, the weighted seasonal population per housing unit is:used to.,measure demand from each residential land use, which is presented in Appendix A,�Table-A-3:.- Level -of -Service The current LOS for all county owned and maintained ;neighborhood, -co`mmunity and regional parks in unincorporate`d'county is 5.59 acres; per 1,000 residents. Table IX -2 presents the calculation of the current LOS for: each park type included in the inventory, as well as Indian River County's adopted •LOSstandard:of 6.61 acres. per 1,000 residents. The impact fee cannot charge, new growth at- a --rate to correct existing deficiencies. In addition, there needs .to be a comrnitment to continue providing the LOS used in the impact fee calculation, which is' typicallIy;:achieved through the adopted LOS standard. For impact fee calculation—pu,rposes, this,tudy usedthe lower of the two figures to provide a conservative approach. ••With}this, approach;='the current achieved LOS is used in the calculation of the parks and"r recreation' impact fee. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 88 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -2 Current Level -of -Service (2013 Calculation Step Figure 2013 Unincorporated Population(') 97,681 Current Regional Parks Number of Acres1�1 511.27 Current Regional Parks LOS Component (Acres per 1,000 Residents)i3i 5.23 Current Neighborhood Parks Number of Acres(2) 34.35 Current Community Parks Number of Acres(2) 1.03 Total Number of Acres (Neighborhood and Community)(4) 35.38 Current Neighborhood & Community Parks LOS Component (Acres pe`r 1,000 Residents)15i 0.36 Current Total Parks LOS (Acres per 1,000 Residents)16i , ._ 5.59 Adopted Total Parks LOS Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents))') , : _,' 6.61 1) 2) 3) (4) (5) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1, Unincorporated Courity ` ,-, Source: Table IX -1 Current regional parks number of acres (Item 2) divided by the unincorporatedpopulation (Item 1), multiplied by 1,000 residents. F'' Sum of current neighborhood parks number of acresarid'currentommunity parks number of acres. Current neighborhood/community parks number of acres (Item 4),divided by the unincorporated ,.- population population (Item 1), multiplied by 1;000 residents. (6) Sum of current regional parks LOS (Item 3) -and current neighborhood/community parks LOS (Item 5) (7) Source: Indian River County , Table IX -3 presentsa comparison of the' parksand recreation adopted LOS standards of other Florida counties to Indian River County,s adopted LOS standards. Based on this comparison,- Indian River: County's adopted LOS standards are in the range of the required acreage per 1;000 residents' in other communities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 89 Impact Fee Update Study 1 s • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component Table IX -3 Level -of -Service Comparison A Jurisdiction ; 1 Brevard County(2) LOS Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents)W1W 3.00 Martin County(3) 3.00 Collier County(4) 3.90 Hernando Count (5) t 4.00 Citrus County(6) 4.50 Okeechobee County(7) , 5.50 Indian River County (Existing)(!) `,, . ,, :. 5.59 River County (Adopted)(9) s.Indian •` 6.61 St. Lucie Countyl1°I ,. ` 7:50 Charlotte County(11) ; , `. , 10.00 Highlands Courify(12� ` 10.00 Osceola County�13�- > 10.00 St. Johns County(14)\ - 28.00 Average-(excludingiIRC :, 8.13 t(1) ,Adopted LOS standards'proyided only include community regional, and other similar types of parks and'exclude local.parks (2) 'Source. Brevard County Comprehensive Plan (3) .Source: Martin.County FY 2013 Capital Improvement Program (4) Source: Collier_County 2013 AUIR ,(5)- Source. Hernando Conty-Comprehensive Plan '16) Source Citrus County Comprehensive Plan (7)\•.Source: Okeechobee County Parks & Recreation Master Plan (8) Source. Table10\ \ (9) Source.'Indian River: County 2030 Comprehensive Plan (10) Source; St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan \(11) Sourc: Smart Charlotte 2050 Comprehensive Plan -(12) Source. Highlands County 2030 Comprehensive Plan (131Source. Osceola County Comprehensive Plan (14) Source:'St. Johns County 2025 Comprehensive Plan The total cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities consists of two components: the cost of purchasing and developing land for each park and the cost of facilities and equipment located at each park. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 90 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Land Cost Because of recent fluctuations in land values statewide, a detailed analysis of land values for each type of park (and the geographic subareas within the county) was conducted. This analysis takes into consideration current land value of the existing parks as reported by the Indian River County Property Appraiser as well as an analysis of recent sales of vacant land similar in size and location to Indian River County's parks. Based on this analysis, an average land value of $50,000 per acre is used in the impact fee calculations. Appendix F provides the data used for this analysis. The cost of land for parks and recreation facilities includes more than just the purchase cost of the land. Landscaping/site improvement and-utilities/paving,costs are also considered. These costs can vary greatly, depending on the type of services -offered at each park. Based on information provided by the County, as'" well as information :from similarly sized jurisdictions and park types, basic landscaping; -'site preparation, andir.rigation costs were estimated and are presented in Table IX -4. 'Table IX -4 Land Cost`per Resident Facility/Calculation Step Land Purchase Cost perAcrehf '' '� r` `a 1 Cost per Acre $50,000 Landscaping, Site:Peparation, and Irrigation Costs (peracre)(2) $5,000 Utilities and Pavin`racre 1: ' g (pe ) ; $20,000 Total Land:Cost�perAcre�4� $75,000 Regional Parks LOS (acres per -1,000 Residents).;) 5.23 Land Cost per Resident`- Regional Park Component(6) $392.25 Neighborhood/Community'Parks LOS(acres per 1,000 Residents)(5) 0.36 Land Cost per Resident - Neighborhood/Community Park Componentm $27.00 Land Cost per Resident - All Parks(8) $419.25 1) Source: Appendix F,s-Table F-10 2) Source: Indian RiverCounty` 3) Source: Indian River County (4) Sum of land purchase cost (Item 1), landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs (Item 2), and utilities and paving per acre cost (Item 3) (5) Source. Table IX -2 (6) Total land cost per acre (Item 4) multiplied by regional parks LOS, divided by 1,000 (7) Total land cost per acre (Item 4) multiplied by neighborhood/community parks LOS, divided by 1,000 (8) Sum of land cost per resident for regional parks (Item 6) and neighborhood/community parks (Item 7) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 91 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Facility and Equipment Cost The second step in calculating the total cost for parks and recreation services in Indian River County involves estimating the current value of recreational facilities. When available, the value for the parks facilities and equipment is estimated based on recent bids or purchases made by the County for its park facilities. When recent bid/purchase information was not available, unit costs from the County's insurance reports and recent costs for similar facilities from other jurisdictions were used. As presented in Table IX -5, the total park facility value is=$3 3 -million for neighborhood and r community parks and $40.7 million for regional parks, for a'combined total of $44 million, including facilities, equipment, and architecture and engineering (A&E) costs. 4 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 92 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -5 Equipment/Buildings Replacement Cost Facility „� Description p tion Unit Unit Value") Community Neighborhood/ Parks Regional Parks Total Cost Count X31 " ' Total Value� $275,000 Count Isl 5 1 Total Value(6) $275,000 Basketball Court court $55,000 5 $550,000 Boat Ramp ramp lane $100,000 0 $0 18 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 Canoe Launch launch $188,000 1 $188,000 4 $752,000 $940,000 Community Center sq ft $180 1,401 $252,180 6,006 $1,081,080 $1,333,260 Dune Walkover walkover $43,000 0 $0 7 $301,000 $301,000 Fishing Pier pier $12,500 1 $12,500 14 $175,000 $187,500 Jogging Trails mile $150,000 1.0 $150,000/ 5.5 $825,000 $975,000 Lifeguard Tower tower $25,000 0 ' •..-$0 5 $125,000 $125,000 Maintenance Facility sq ft $100 0 i .; $0 .., 8,850 $885,000 $885,000 Multi -Purpose Bldg sq ft $150 0 '', . $0 '/.76,600 $11,490,000 $11,490,000 Olympic Aquatic Center center $3,000,000 ,,0 '` $0 \ , �,, 1 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Picnic Pavilion pavilion $40,000 5 / $200,000 54 $2,160,000 $2,360,000 Playground playground $90,000 _:._ . , 5 $450,0008 \. $720,000 $1,170,000 Restroom restroom $85,000 ` `,,4 $340,000 28 $2,380,000 $2,720,000 Soccer Field field $325,000 '' 6, 40 6 $1,950,000 $1,950,000 Softball Field field $500,000 `2 !,$1,000,000' 12 $6,000;000 $7,000,000 Swimming Pool pool $2,000,000 0 \ . ''". - $0 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Tennis Courts court '• /$50,000 , 1 ' . $50,000 4 $20,000 $250,000 Volleyball Court court ' $20,000 ' "'- . 1 $20,000 3 $60,000 $80,000 Facilities and Equipment Replacement Value $2,937,680 . $36,179,080 $39,116,760 Architecture, Engineering, and Inspection @ 12.5%(8),$367,210 $4,522,385 $4,889,595 Total Facilities and Equipment Replacement Valuel'I $3,304,890 $40,701,465 $44,006,355 Total Number ofAcres1101 ' , / _\ 35.38 511.27 546.65 Facilities and Equipment Value_per Acrel" \ \ $93,411 $79,609 $80,502 Level-of-Service(12) 0.36 5.23 5.59 Facilities and Equipment Value per Resident(13) - $33.63 $416.36 $449.99 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Unit replacement value (Item2) multiplied by the number of units per facility (Item 5) (7) Sum of the total value for community parks (Item 4) and the total value of regional parks (Item 6) (8) Facility and equipment`value inultiplied by 12.5% based on discussions with Indian River County (9) Sum of the facilities and_equipment replacement value and the architecture, engineering, and inspection cost (Item 8) for each park. -- (10) Source: Table IX -1 (11) Total facilities and equipment cost (Item 9) divided by the total number of acres (Item 10) for each park type (12) Source: Table IX -2 (13) Facilities and equipment value per acre (Item 11) multiplied by the level -of -service (Item 12) divided by 1,000 Source: Table_IX-T -- Ba'sed on insurance values of existing,facilities, iriformation from previous studies for IRC as well as information from other -Florida jurisdictions Source.°Table IX -1 • -.\ Unit value (Item 2) multiplied by,the number of units per facility (Item 3) Source: Table IX -1 t Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 93 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Total Impact Cost per Resident Table IX -6 presents the total impact cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities in Indian River County. Using the current achieved LOS, as previously presented in Table IX -2, the total cost for neighborhood/community parks in Indian River County is $61 per resident and the total cost for regional parks is $809 per resident, for a total of $869 per resident. Table IX -6 Total Impact Cost per Resident, r - Component Total Land Value per Resident'"`;$27.00 Park Type j Total �— Neighborhood/ j Community Regional `� $392.25 $419.25 Total Facility Value per Resident(2) -- ! $33.63 "- $416.36 $449.99 Total Impact Cost per Resident(3) $60.63 $808.61 $869.24 (1) Source: Table IX -4 (2) Source: Table IX -5 (3) Sum of the land value per resident (Item 1) and the facility,value per acre (Item 2 Credit Component To avoid overcharging new development for the capital. cost of providing parks and Y' recreation services, a review of the capital financing program for the parks and recreation program, -was; completed...... Thepurpose,,of this review was to determine any potential revenues generated- by, new -development, other than impact fees, which have been used within,.rs the last five yea,or planned to be `used over the next five years to fund the expansion, of,,capital facilities, land; and,equipment related to Indian River County's parks and recreation -,,program. `Based on`rthis review, Indian River County's parks capital expansion improvements are'being funded primarily with sales tax revenues (96 percent of • total non -impact fee 'spending), and, at a lesser degree, with general fund and grant revenues. Capital Expansion Expenditures Credit Between 2008 and 2017, Indian River County spent or planned to spend a total of $6.4 million for capital expansion of parks, resulting in an average annual capital expansion expenditure of $639,000. Since the review of these expenditures spanned 2008 through 2017, the average annual capital expansion cost is divided by the average population for this same period. As presented in Table IX -7, the average annual capital expansion Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 94 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study expenditure is approximately $7 per resident. As mentioned previously, a large part of this funding (96 percent) is obtained from the optional sales tax, which will expire in 2019. This analysis assumes that the sales tax will not be re -adopted. If the sales tax is ne'adopted, the credit calculations should be reviewed to determine if a revision is needed. � ) Tindale -Oliver & AssociatesInc. Indian River County January 2014 95 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -7 Historical and Programmed Capital Costs • Project Descriptionu) 1 FY 2007/08 jl FY 2008/09 I FY 2009/1011 FY 2010/11 ); FY 2011/12 I FY 2012/13 II FY 2013/14 I FY 2014/15 11 FY 2015/16]I FY 2016/17 II Sales Tax: Total Parks Maintenance Complex - - 51,512,092 - - - - - - - 51,512,092 Gifford Park Security House $146,084 - - - - - - - - - $146,084 West County Regional Park - - - - - - - - - 51,000,000 $1,000,000 North County Soccer Lights - - - - -- - - - 550,000 550,000 South County Regional Park Fence Project Ph. II - - - - - - $100,000 - - - $100,000 South County Intergenerational Multi -Purpose Facility - - _ _ X51,843,545 $1,500,000 -3,343,545 Subtotal -- Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues 5146,084 - 51,512,092 . - ' - 51,843,545 51,600,000 - - 51,050,000 56,151,721 Subtotal -- Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues(2) AIM, f, ,. \ 5615,172 Average Annual Expenditures per Resident (Sales Tax)131 a;;;1, \ 56.31 General Fund Revenues & Grants: . Gifford Park Football Fields - 515,210 - \ - ./ - - - - - - $15,210 Irrigation of Football Fields (Gifford Park) 523,310 - _.- - - - - - - - $23,310 Oslo Boat Ramp & Parking - -:3.' .- - - $200,000 - _ _ - $200,000 Subtotal -- Expenditures Funded with General Fund & Grants $23,310 515,210 ! - 5200,000 - - - - 5238,520 Subtotal -- Average Annual Expenditures Funded with General Fund & Grants(4) tii) 523,852 Average Annual Expenditures per Resident (General Fund & Grants)151 -- $0.24 Sales Tax and General Fund Revenues and Grants: Total 1 5169,3941 515,2101 51,512,0921 J -7•'.. 501 501 52,043,5451 51,600,0001 $01 501 51,050,000 56,390,241 Average Annual Expenditures(6) - ",;„. ' $639,024 Average Annual Population - Unincorporated County(') 97,443 Average Annual Expenditures per Residential \ $6.56 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Subtotal —expenditures funded with sales tax revenues divided by 10 years (3) Subtotal —average annual expenditures funded with sales tax revenues (Item 2) divided by the average annual population (Item 7) (4) Subtotal —expenditures funded with general funds & grants divided by 10 years \ (5) Subtotal —average annual expenditures funded with general fund & grants (Item 4) divided by the average annual population (Item 7) (6) Total parks & recreational facilities expenditures divided by 10 years (7) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1; Unincorporated County (8) Average annual expenditures (Item 6) divided by the average annual population (Item 7) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 96 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study s • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Cost The net parks and recreation impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table IX -8 summarizes the calculation of the net parks and recreation cost per resident for both neighborhood/community and regional parks. The first section of Table IX -8 identifies_ the total impact cost as $869 per resident for all J. parks. The second section of the table identifies the .r`evernue credits for the parks and • 7 recreation impact fee, totaling approximately $34 forall=parks. ''-'- The net impact cost per resident is the different -between the total impact cost and the total revenue credit per resident. This results in a;net impact cost of $836:per resident for all parks. Table IX=8. Net Impact Cost per Resident Calculation Step Impact Cost ( Impact 1 Cost I ,' - ! Sales Tax _ j Revenue Credits General Fund & Grants Total Total Impact Cost per Res'ident(1) ' $869.24 Revenue Credit --«- - -= Avg Annual Ca.ital Ex.ansion;Credit •er•Resident(2 $6.31 $0.24 Ca.italization Rate`' "' , 2.5% 2.5% Capitalization Period (in'years) 5 25 Capital Ex•ansion Credit per•R6ident(3)'-'j-- . $29.32 $4.42 $33.74 Net Impact Cost-' ` Net Impact Costper:Resident(4) \i';- '? $835.50 (1) Source Table IX:6; `4 (2) Source Table IX -7 (3) Source: The present value of;the capital improvement credit per resident (Item 2) at a discount rate of 2.5% with a capitalization period of 5 years for sales tax expenditures and 25 years for general fund & grant expenditures. (4) Total impact cost per resident (Item 1) less the total revenue credit per resident (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 97 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Calculated Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Table IX -9 presents the calculated parks and recreation impact fee schedule developed for residential land uses. As previously mentioned, only residential development within unincorporated Indian River County is assessed a parks and recreation impact fee. Table IX -9 Calculated Parks & Recreation Impact Fee,Schedule Land Use, Residential Impact Unit Residents per Li Net Cost per Resident Net Impact Fee (3) Administrative Fee ) Total 1 Impact (51 Fee Current Adopted Fee(6) Percent Change) Sin:le Famil (less than 1,500sf du 2.09 $835.50 $1,746.20 $43.66 $1,789.86 $1,334.42 34.1% Sin le Famil 1,500to 2,499sf du 2.27 $835:50 $1,896.59 .$47-41 $1,944.00 $1,499.45 29.6% Sin le Famil (2,500sfor:reater du 2.53 $835.50'$2,113.82 $52.85 $2,166.67 $1,626.45 33.2% Multi-Famil /Accesso Unit du 1.30 ..$835:50 $1,086.15 $2715 $1,113.30 $906.17 22.9% Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) du 1.30 $835.50 $1,086.15 $27 15 $1,113.30 $965.68 15.3% (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Source: Appendix A, Table A-3 Source Table IX -8 Residents per unit (Item 1) for each'land use category multipliedby net cost per residenf(Item 2) An administrative fee is assessed at 2'.5% of the -net impact fee,(Item 3) Sum of the net impact fee (Item 3) and.the administrative fee (Itern`4)` Source Indian River County. Fees shown include a 2.5%>administratiive fee. Percent change from the cu'frent adopted rates (Item 4) -to the calculated total impact fee rate (Item 3) - • Affordable Growth°Strategy Based on_,a review:.of capital expansion 'expenditures between 2008 and 2017, the County will use approximately $639,000per year of, -non -impact fee funding over the next five years and $24;000 per year afterwards. :As mentioned previously, during the next 25 years, the County isexpected to grow-.at ann'aririval rate of 1.4 percent. Figure IX -1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. The maximum calculated fee is, `comparecr investment needed to maintain the current adopted LOS standard. Alth'ough.=the ;Couritymay charge the maximum amount of parks and recreation impact fee calculated,, the County needs approximately 92 percent of the maximum impact fee revenues to maintain the current LOS. As mentioned previously, the available non- impact fee consists primarily of sales tax revenues. These calculations assume that the sales tax will not be re -adopted in 2019. If the sales tax is re -adopted, the Affordable Growth calculations should be reviewed to see if a revision is necessary. In addition, the County is targeting non-residential land uses for potential discounts and the parks and recreation fees are charged only to residential land uses. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 98 Impact Fee Update Study • s • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study 120% 10096 80% Li n 60% 4036 20% 096 Figure IX -1 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Strategy 0.0096 1.00% 2.00% 3.0096 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.0096 8.00% 9.00% 10.0096 Annual Growth Rate Table IX -10 presents discounted impact=fee schedule. =ti Table IX -10 Calculated Parki& Recreation ImpactFee Schedule,— Affordable Growth Land Use Residential Impact ( Unit ' Affordable Growth Adoption Rate(1) Total Impact Fee(2) Current Adopted Fee(3) Percent Change Total Cost - Maximum Impact Fee - LOS Curve - IRC Annual - Average Growih $1,334.42 0.0096 1.00% 2.00% 3.0096 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.0096 8.00% 9.00% 10.0096 Annual Growth Rate Table IX -10 presents discounted impact=fee schedule. =ti Table IX -10 Calculated Parki& Recreation ImpactFee Schedule,— Affordable Growth Land Use Residential Impact ( Unit ' Affordable Growth Adoption Rate(1) Total Impact Fee(2) Current Adopted Fee(3) Percent Change SinglesFamily (less than 1500.sf) ` 'du 92% $1,646.66 $1,334.42 23.4% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499-sf), \du, 92% $1,788.48 $1,499.45 19.3% Single Family,(2,500sf orgreate`r) du 92% $1,993.33 $1,626.45 22.6% Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 92% $1,024.24 $906.17 13.0% Mobile Home/RV Park(•tied_down) du 92% $1,024.24 $965.68 6.1% (1) Calculated based on'ari average annual spending of $639,000 for the next 5 years and $24,000 per year afterwards, and an average annual growth rate of 1.4% over the next 25 years (2) Total impact fee from Table IX -9 (Item 5) multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) (3) Source Indian River County. Fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee. (4) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 3) to the calculated total impact fee rate (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 99 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's parks and recreation impact fee program, a comparison impact fee schedules was completed for surrounding counties and other jurisdictions throughout Florida. Table IX -11 presents this comparison. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 100 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -11 Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Comparison Land Use Date of Last U. date Unit") 1 Indian River County 1 St. Lucie County (sl 2009 Osceola County lel 2006 Charlotte l (z) County I 2009 Citrus County Is) 2010 Collier I County(9)County(w)County(11) 2010 Hernando 2005 Highlands I I 2006 Martin County(u)County(13) 2012 St. Johns Calculated 12) 2013 Affordable Growth (3) 2013 ExistingI<) 2005 2011 Ado. tion Percenta:e 100% n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Residential: Sin:le Famil 2,000sf du 51,944 51,788 51,499 51,533 5924 5718 $566 53,133 5411 5757 51,972 $472 Multi-Famil /Accesso Unit 1,000sf 51,113 51,024 5906 51,368 5679 5480 5425 51,685 5311 5525 51,972 $472 Mobile Home/RV Park tied down 1,000sf 51,113 51,024 $966 51,004 5677 $508 5543 $2,393 5411 $431 51,972 $472 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table IX -9 'If (3) Source: Table IX -10 1,111 i 11 (4) Source: Indian River County 'All' (5) Source: St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing. (6) Source: Osceola County Community Development Department \ \ (7) Source: Charlotte County Community Development Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended. (8) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department \ (9) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department. Average of community and regional parks. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. (10) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department ..:::. "'. (11) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28. Impact fees moratorium in effect through June 30; 2014. (12) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department "- ' (13) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indekirig: Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 101 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study X. Transportation Indian River County's Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance was most recently updated in 2009 to assist the County in providing adequate transportation facilities for expected growth. This section of the impact fee report provides the results of the transportation impact fee analysis and consists of the following sections: e • • • 0 Demand Component Cost Component Credit Component Calculated Transportation Impact Fee:Schedule Affordable Growth Strategy Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As in the case of other impact; fee program areas, ;the methodology used for the transportation impact fee study follows-a,consumption;based impact fee approach, in which new development-ischarged based upon the- proportion,of vehicle -miles of travel (VMT) that each unit ofnew,developmentis, expected'toconsume of a lane mile of roadway f network. Included -in this document is the,necessary, support material used in the calculation of the transportation impact'fee. 'The general. equation used to compute the impact fee for a given land use is: ; ,- , \ \`. 1 `<, ' 7 [Demand"x Cost] — Credit = Fee The demand for travel placed;on the transportation system is expressed in units of VMT (daily vehicle -trip generation 'rate times the trip length times the percent new trips [of total trips]) for each land use contained in the impact fee schedule. The trip generation is expressed in average daily rates since new development consumes trips on a daily basis. The cost of building new capacity typically is expressed in units of dollars per vehicle mile or lane mile of roadway capacity. The credit is an estimate of the future non -impact fee revenues generated by new development that are allocated to transportation capacity expansion construction projects. Thus, the impact fee is an "up front" payment for a portion of the cost of building a lane mile of capacity directly related to the amount of Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 102 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • capacity consumed by each unit of land use contained in the impact fee schedule that is not • paid for by future tax revenues generated by new development. It should be noted that the information used to develop the impact fee schedule was based on the most recent, reliable, and localized data available. The following input variables used in the fee equation: Demand Variables: • Trip generation rate • Trip length • Percent new trips • Interstate and toll facility discount factor Cost Variables: • Cost per lane mile • Capacity added per lane mile; Credit Variables: • Equivalent gas; tax credit (pennies • Present worth., • Fuel efficiency • Effective, days per year r A review'of impact fee variables'and,corresponding recommendations are presented in the following`subsections. tf ,. l Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 103 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Demand Component Travel Demand The amount of transportation system consumed by a unit of new land development is calculated using the following variables and is measured in terms of the vehicle miles of new travel a unit of development consumes on the existing road system. • Number of daily trips generated; • Average length of those trips; and • Proportion of travel that is new travel, rather than travel that is already traveling on the road system and is captured by new development. As part of this update, the trip characteristics .variables were obtained primarily from two sources: (1) trip characteristics .studies previously -conducted throughout Florida by TOA (Florida Studies Database), and (42)?the;Institute of,Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation report (9th edition). • The Florida Studies`; Database is included',in Appendix B. This database was used to determine VMT, which is developed from trip length, percent new trips, and trip rate for most land uses in the'fee'schedule: The data in -the trip characteristics database is based on actual land` Ue—studies and was:collected throughout Florida using machine traffic counts and site specific land use origin- destination,surveys. In addition, trip generation data from the ITE 9t --h Edition Trip Generation report was used. In instances where trip generation was available -from the ITE Trip Generation'report and the Florida Studies Database, a blended average calculation was used toNincreasethe sample size. Interstate and Toll'Facility Discount Factor This variable is used to recognize that improvements to Interstate highways are funded by the State using earmarked and Federal funds, while toll facility improvements are funded with toll revenues. Typically, impact fees are not used to pay for these improvements, and the portion of new development's travel occurring on the interstate/toll facility system usually is eliminated from the total travel for each land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County. January 2014 104 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study To calculate the interstate and toll (I/T) facility discount factor, the loaded highway network file was generated for the Greater Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model v3.4 (GTCRPM). A select Zink analysis was run for all traffic analysis zones located within Indian River County in order to differentiate trips with an origin and/or destination within the county versus trips with no origin or destination within the county. Currently, the only interstate/toll facilities in Indian River County are 1-95 and the Florida Turnpike (SR 19). The limited access vehicle miles of travel'(Limited Access VMT) for trips with an origin and/or destination within Indian River ?County was calculated for the identified limited access facilities. The total Indian River;County VMT was calculated for all r trips with an origin and/or destination within Indiari-River County for all roads, including limited access roads, located within Indian River County. The I/T discount factor of 17.3 percent was dete`rmined by.dividing the'1total Limited Access VMT by the total Indian River County VMT. By applying`this7factor to the total Indian River County VMT for each land use in`the fee schedule, the reduced VMT is then representative of only the roadways which are funded'•bOmpact fees. -Appendix B, Table B-1 provides further detail on this calculation. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 105 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component The cost of providing roadway system capacity has decreased in recent years. Construction costs increased significantly in Florida between 2005 and 2007 due to additional construction demand caused by hurricanes, the housing market growth, and other factors. Appreciation in land values also resulted in higher right-of-way (ROW) costs during the same period. In early 2008, costs started to stabilize, and in recent years, communities have experienced a decrease in construction costs, returning to'levels seen before 2005. Cost information from Indian River County, other Florida Counties, and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) was reviewed to develop a'unifcost for all phases involved in the construction of one lane -mile of roadway capacity. • The following subsections summarize the methodology and findings of the total,,unit.,cost analysis fdrrcounty and state roads. Appendix C provides the data and other support information utilizedin:these analyses. County Roadway Costs This section examines the right-of-way'(ROW),. construction, and other cost components associated with county,_roads with respect to ..transportation, -capacity improvements in Indian River County.For this purpose, recent bididata for ongoing projects provided by the County and recent::construction bid data from county roadway projects throughout Florida were used to identify and provide ,supporting cost data for county improvements. The cost for each --roadway capacity 'project ,:,was separated into four phases: design, construction engineering inspection (CEI), ROW_and construction. Design and CEI Design costs4forcounty roads Were estimated at 10 percent construction phase costs based on a review of'.cost-data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional`detail is.proyided in Appendix C, Table C-10. .S CEI costs for county roads were estimated at 9 percent of construction phase costs based on a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C-16. Right-of-Wav The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along a corridor that were necessary to have sufficient cross-section width to widen an existing road or, in the case of new Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 106 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study construction, to build a new road. A review of recent ROW cost data for Indian River County identified 12 recent improvements with acquisition data. Using the construction costs for these improvements, a ROW factor of construction was calculated for each improvement, ranging from six (6) to 150 percent, with a weighted average of approximately 41 percent. This calculated local factor was consistent with county road ROW factors observed in recent impact fee studies throughout Florida and was used as the basis for ROW costs in Indian River County. As seen in Table X-1, this amount is equal to approximately $0.66 million per lane mile for county roads.-` Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Tables C-4, C-5, C-11, and C-12. Construction The construction cost for county roads was' based on a review' •of local and statewide projects. A review of recent construction cost" data for Indian River''County identified 12 • .`1 recent capacity expansion improvements 'throughout ,the County:,., 'Based on these improvements, a weighted average cost of $1.80, rnillion per lane mile was calculated for use in the impact fee calculationn•,(as_seen in Table‘Xt1):�,•This figure was compared to the average construction cost per lane :mile -observed in other jurisdictions throughout the state. These statewide projects averaged approximately $2.18 million per lane mile for construction. Therefore, compared to< the statewide'data, local Indian River costs are approximately 83.,.percent of.the statewide' average. - Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Tables, C -6,•-C-7, C-13,,and C-14.` -Table X=1Y Estimated Total,Cost per Lane Mile for County Roads Cost Phase -- Cost per Lane Mile Urban j Desi n Rural ' Design Weighted Average Design') $180,000 $149,000 $159,000 Right-of-Way(2) $738,000 $613,000 $656,000 Construct'•on(3) $1,800,000 $1,494,000 $1,598,000 CEI(4) $162,000 $134,000 $143,000 Total Cost $2,880,000 $2,390,000 $2,556,000 1) Source: Appendix C, Table C-2 2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-4 3) Source Appendix C, Table C-6 (4) Source. Appendix C, Table C-8 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 107 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study State Roadway Costs This section examines the ROW, construction, and other cost components associated with state roads with respect to transportation capacity improvements in Indian County. For this purpose, recent bid data from state roadway projects throughout Florida and the FDOT's Long Range Estimates (LRE) were used to identify and provide supporting cost data for state improvements. The cost for each roadway capacity project was separated into four phases: design, CEI, ROW and construction. Design and CEI Design costs for state roads were estimated at 9 percent construction phase costs based on a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impatt fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C-10. CEI costs for state roads were estimated at 11 percentofconstruction phase costs based on a review of cost data collected `for.s.recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C`16. Right -of -Way Due to a lack of :local right-of-way acquisition,, cost data._ for state roads in Indian River County, a review of 'ROW costs from recent transportation fee studies throughout Florida was conducted: -.Based ori:this review, ROW for state roadways was estimated at 44 percent of the construction cost for•.state roads: As shown in Table X-2, this amount is equal to ti. approximately $0.78 million Per :lane mile. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C11.2.\ \ • Construction `\.. A review of recent`.state ,road capacity improvements in Indian River identified three projects from 2008 and' 2009"(SR 60 and SR 5 widening). These three projects averaged approximately $2.95 million per lane mile for construction. However, due to the small sample size, these projects were blended with 49 additional capacity expansion projects throughout Florida, which resulted in a weighted average cost of $2.44 million per lane mile. An analysis of county roadway improvements, where a larger sample of local projects was available, in relation to statewide county road improvements, indicated that construction costs average approximately 83 percent of construction costs statewide. Based on this conclusion, the construction costs for state roadways in Indian River County Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 108 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study ® were estimated at 83 percent of the state average of $2.44 million. Additional detail is • • provided in Appendix C, Table C-15. Table X-2 Estimated Total Cost per Lane Mile for State Roads Cost Phase Design(1) _ Cost__ per Lane Mile Urban Design Rural Design Weighted Average $220,000 $183,000 $196,000 Right-of-Wayl2> $880,000 $730,000 $781,000 Construction(31 $2,000,000 $1,660,000 $1,776,000 CEI(4) $220,000 $183,000 $196,000 Total Cost $3,320,000 $2,756,000 $2,949;000 1) Source. Appendix C, Table C-3 K 2) Source. Appendix C, Table C-5 3) Source. Appendix C, Table C-7 (4) Source: Appendix C, Table C-9 Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis) , The weighted average; cost per lane mile for county`and-state_roads is presented in Table X- 3. The resulting weighted average cost of approximately $2.59 million per lane mile was utilized as the roadway cost .input in the calculation of the transportation impact fee schedule..-; The weighted average cost per;Iane mile includes county and state roads and is based ori rweighti;ng l'the lanemiles of roadway improvements in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTI?) \ '-:--'s Compared to' the:,.previous transportation impact fee update, the estimated cost of $2.59 million represents ;a slight increase in the unit cost per lane mile for roadway. The previous cost, established in a,2004:Traffic Impact Fee Study, was estimated at $2.46 million. This represents a five percent increase in the roadway unit cost per lane mile since the 2004 study. Compared to recent transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida in the past few years, the unit cost per lane mile estimated in this update is considerably lower. Recent unit costs have ranged from approximately $2.91 million to $4.44 million, with an average cost of $3.61 million. The lower costs in Indian River County can be attributed to the lower construction costs observed in recent local bids as well as the mix of planned Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 109 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study urban and rural designed roadways. Compared to other jurisdictions, Indian River County plans to construct a greater proportion of rural designed roadways, which are less expensive than roadways with urban design characteristics. Table X-3 Estimated Cost per Lane Mile for County and State Roadway Projects in Indian River County Cost Phase County ! Roads") i State Roads(2) County and State Roads(3) Design $159,000 $196,000 $162,000 Right -of -Way $656,000 $781,000 $667,000 Construction $1,598,000 $1,776,000 $1,614,000 CEI $143,000 $196,000 $148,000 Total Cost $2,556,000 $2,949,000 $2,591,000 Lane Mile Distribution(4) 91% \, ' ,' 9% 100% (1) Source Table X-1 i (2) Source. Table X-2 . (3) Lane mile distribution (Item 4) multiplied by the design, ROW, construction, and CEI phase costs by jurisdiction•to develop a'weighted average cost per lane mile (4) Source Appendix. C, Table C-17, Items (a) and (b),,` Capacity Added per Lane Mile An additional component ,of ;the;transportation;impact fee equation is the capacity added • per lane mile (also, known asthe maximurri service volume added per mile) of roadway constructed. To calculate the vehicle miles of capacity (VMC) per lane mile of constructed future roadway, an analysis of the\2035 projects (see Appendix C, Table C-17) was conducted to'reflect the mix.of\\countyand state road improvement that will be built in the future. As shown in Table X-4;--t-he resulting average capacity per lane mile calculated based on these projects is 8,255. , The updated capacity added per lane mile estimate of 8,255 is approximately three percent less than the figure used in the 2004 Traffic Impact Fee Study. It should be noted that this figure (8,499) was not changed as part of the 2009 update. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 110 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table X-4 Weighted Average Vehicle -Miles of Capacity per Lane Mile Source County Roads Lane Mile Added") 201.90 Vehicle Miles of ; Capacity Added") 1,632,287 VMC Added per Lane Mile") 8,085 State Roads 19.00 191,352 10,071 Total 220.90 1,823,639 $313.87 Weighted Average VMC Added per Lane Mile(4) 8,255 (1) Source. Appendix C, Table C-17 - (2) Source. Appendix C, Table C-17 (3) Vehicle miles of capacity added (Item 2) divided by lane'miles added (Item 1) (4) Total vehicle miles of capacity added for county and state roads (Item 2) divided by the total lane miles added (Item 1) Cost per Vehicle -Mile of Capacity Added The impact fee cost per unit of development•is assessed based on the'cost,per vehicle -mile of capacity. As shown in Tables X.-3 and X-4, the cost<and,capacity for county roads have been calculated based on typical'roadway improvements. As shown in Table X-5, the cost per VMC for travel within IRC is apjproximately$314. This•average cost per VMC figure is used in the impact fee calculation\to determine the total impact cost per unit of development based/on the vehicle-miles,.of travel consumed. For each vehicle -mile of travel that is added to the road system, approximately;$314 of roadway capacity is consumed. . Table X-5 '.-Weighted Average Cost -tier: Vehicle -Mile of Capacity Added Source County Roads Cost per Lane Mile �l) ,1 $2,556,000 Average VMC Added per Lane , Mile�2) 8,085 Cost per VMC l3) $316.14 State Roads $2,949,000 10,071 $292.82 Weighted Average /1 $2,591,000 8,255 $313.87 (1) Source Table X=3 (2) Source Table X-4 (3) Cost per lane mile (Item 1) divided by average capacity added per lane mile (Item 2) It is important to note that capacity projects eligible for impact fee funding include not only new construction and lane additions, but also associated intersection improvements, traffic signalization, and other amenities and technology improvements that allow for additional vehicle capacity. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 111 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Credit Component Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit The present value of the portion of non -impact fee revenues (converted to equivalent gasoline taxes) generated by a new development over a 25 -year period that is projected to be expended on capacity expansion projects is credited against the cost of the system consumed by travel associated with new development. County A review of the County's historical roadway financing program (FY 2008-2013) and the FY 2014- •, 2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) shows that allroadway projects ,are being funded by a combination of fuel taxes, sales tax, grants,�.developer funds, and transportation impact fees. - Currently, capacity -adding projects in the county are primarily funded with'fuel,tax and sales tax revenues. Based on the FY 2014-2017.CIP and discussionswith County staff, it was'assumed that sales tax revenues will only be available toifund transportation capacity over the next five years, and will not be a recurring revenue source: Therefore, only Sive years of sales tax revenues are included in the credit calculations. If the'sales fax -is ie -adopted in -2019 or a different revenue source is allocated to`thetransportation capacity to replace the sales tax revenues, these credit figures may need tSo be:revised. As'shown in Table,X-6, the sales•tax portion of the county credit was separated from' the\total county credit' and all non -impact fee funding allocated to transportation:capacity wa`sconverted toequivalent gas tax revenues. A total gas tax equivalent revenue credit of 11.1 pennies•.was given for.sales.tax revenues and 5.6 pennies was given for all y other -revenue sources.' _- . State \ State expenditures on state roads`were reviewed, and a credit for the capacity expansion portion attributable to state, projects` was estimated. The equivalent number of pennies allocated to fund state projects was-deterrnined from projects spanning a 10 -year period (2009-2018). This period represents past expenditures (from 2009 to 2013) from the FDOT Work Program and the projected expenditures (from 2014 to 2018) from the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). A list of capacity -adding roadway projects was developed, including lane additions, new road construction, intersection improvements, interchanges, traffic signal projects, and other capacity -addition projects. This review (summarized in Appendix D, Table D- 3) indicates that FDOT spending generates an equivalent gas tax credit of 15.5 pennies of gas tax Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 112 Impact Fee Update Study e Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study revenue annually, which is within the range of what is observed in most other Florida jurisdictions. In summary, Indian River County contributes approximately 16.7 pennies toward roadway capacity expansion projects, while the State spends an average of 15.5 pennies for state roadway projects in Indian County. Therefore, a total of 32.2 pennies of credit are included in the impact fee calculation to recognize the future capital revenue that is expected to be generated by new development from all non -impact fee revenues, as shown in Table X-6. Table X-6 -';. / Equivalent Pennies of Gas Tax, Revenue Credit County Revenues (excluding•sales tax)I11 Equivalent Pennies per Gallon `'$0.056 County Revenues (sales tax ONLY)(z)-.. $0.111 State Revenuesi3lr/.- $0.155 Total $0.322 (1) Source: Appendix b, Table D-2-" (2) Source: Appendix D,'fTable D-3 (orily.accountsfor5 years of sales tax revenues) (3), -Source: -Appendix D, Table D-4 Present Worth Variables., Facility The `roadway facility life used in the impact-feeanalysis is 25 years, which represents the reasonable'life of a roadway: Interest Rate This is the discount'rafe at which gasoline tax revenues might be bonded. It is used to compute the present value of the•gasolibe taxes generated by new development. The discount rate of 2.5 percent was used in the `transportation impact fee calculation based on the estimate obtained from Indian River County. Fuel Efficiency The fuel efficiency (i.e., the average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed) of the fleet of motor vehicles was estimated using the quantity of gasoline consumed by travel associated with a particular land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 113 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Appendix D, Table D-8 documents the calculation of fuel efficiency value based on the following equation, where "VMT" is vehicle miles of travel and "MPG" is fuel efficiency in terms of miles per gallon. Fuel Efficiency=1VMTRoadwayType VMT VehicleType MPG VehicleType / RoadwayType The methodology uses non -interstate VMT and averagefuel-efficiency data for passenger vehicles (i.e., passenger cars and other 2 -axle, 4-tirevehicles, such as vans, pickups, and SUVs) and large trucks (i.e., single -unit, 2 -axle, ,;6=tire or more trucks and combination trucks) to calculate the total gallons of fuel used by'each of these vehicle types. The combined total VMT for the vehicle types -is then divided by the combined total gallons of fuel consumed to calculate, in,effect, a "weigh"ted';.fuel ;efficiency value'ttiat reflects the existing fleet mix of traffic on =non, interstate roadways. The VMT and average fuel efficiency data were obtained from- the;^most recent''Federal Highway Administration's Highway Statistics 2O11,Based on the, calculation completeddAil--Appendix D, Table D-8, the fuel efficiency rate to be used in.the updated impact fee equation%is 18.19 miles per gallon. Effective Days per Year_2 An effective 365 -days -per year of operation -was assumed for all land uses in the proposed fee. However, this will not be Ahe case for.\all land uses since some uses operate only on weekdays (e.g., office 'buildings) and/or only seasonally (e.g., schools). The use of 365 days per year, therefore, provides a conservative estimate, ensuring that gasoline taxes are adequately credited against the fee.`Ni , • Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 114 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule The impact fee calculations for each land use are included in Appendix E, which includes the major land use categories and the impact fees for the individual land uses contained in each of the major categories. For each land use, Appendix E illustrates the following: • Demand component variables (trip rate, trip length, and percent of new trips); • Total impact fee cost; r'„ > • Annual gas tax credit; ,-' • Present value of the gas tax credit; • Net transportation impact fee; • Current Indian River County impact fee;and • Percent difference between the calculated impact fee and the`'c Trent impact fee. It should be noted that the net/iiiipact fee illustrated iri Appendix E is n`of necessarily a recommended fee, but instead represents-rthe technically defensible impact fee per unit of land use that could be charged in Indian,River-County. N` For clarification purposes, -'the calculation,'of an impact fee foe" one land use category is presented. In the •following example, the net, impact fee is -calculated for the single-family residential detached land use category (ITE LUC :210) using information from the impact fee schedule'includetin Appendix E, Table E-1. For.each land use category, the following equations'are utilized -to ;calculate -the net impactfee: Where: Total Impact Cost = ([Trip Rate x Assessable Trip Length x % New Trips] / 2) x (1 — Interstate/Toll Facility Disc. Factor) x (Cost per Vehicle -Mile of Capacity) Net Impact'Fee = Total Impact Cost — Gas Tax Credit Gas Tax Credit = Present Value (Annual Gas Tax), given 2.5% interest rate & 25 -year facility life Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 115 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Annual Gas/Sales Tax = ([Trip Rate x Total Trip Length x % New Trips] / 2) x (Effective Days per Year x 5/Gallon to Capital) / Fuel Efficiency Each of the inputs has been discussed previously in this document; however, for purposes of this example, brief definitions for each input are provided in the following paragraphs, along with the actual inputs used in the calculation of the fee for the single-family detached residential land use (1,500-2,499 sf) category: -4 S • Trip Rate = the average daily trip generation rate, in vehicle-trips/day (7.81). • Assessable Trip Length = the actual average trip -length- for the category, in vehicle -miles (6.62). • ti • Total Trip Length = the assessable trip length' plus an adjustment factor of half a mile, which is added to the trip length to account for the fact that gas taxes are collected for travel on all roads including local roads (6.62°+ 0.50 =,7,-.-12). - New Trips =adjustment factor to account .for tripsthat are already on;the roadway • (100%). '., • Divide by 2 = the total daily miles of travel generated ,by a particular category (i.e., rate*Iength*% new trips) is divided,. by twos to sprevent, thedouble-countingof travel generated betWeen two1and use codes since"everyrytrip has ari origin and a destination. • Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor'= ,discount `factor to account for the travel demand occurring on interstate highways and/or toll facilities (17.3%). • Cost -per Lane, Mile=, unit cost .to construct one lane mile of roadway, in $/lane -mile • Average Capacity Added per Lane Mile = represents the average daily traffic on one travel lane at capacity,fdr„one lane'mile of roadway, in vehicles/lane-mile/day (8,255). • Cost perVehicle-Mile of Capacity =-unit of vehicle -miles of capacity consumed per unit of development. Cost per,lane mile divided by average capacity added per lane mile ($2,591,000 / 8;255 ,,$31187). • Present Value = calculation of the present value of a uniform series of cash flows, gas tax payments in this case, given an interest rate, "i," and a number of periods, "n;" for 2.5% interest and a 25 -year facility life, the uniform series present worth factor is 18.4244. For sales tax, which is available only for the next five years, the present worth factor is 4.6458. • Effective Days per Year = 365 days. • $/Gallon to Capital = the amount of gas tax revenue per gallon of fuel that is used for capital improvements, in $/gallon ($0.211 for gas tax; $0.111 for sales tax). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 116 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Fuel Efficiency = average fuel efficiency of vehicles, in vehicle-miles/gallon (18.19). Transportation Impact Fee Calculation Using these inputs, a net impact fee can be calculated for the single-family residential detached land use (1,500-2,499 sf) category as follows: Total Impact Cost = ([7.81 * 6.62 * 1.0] /2) * (1 - 0.173) * ($313.87) = $6,710 Annual Sales Tax Credit = ([7.81 * 7.12 * 1.0] /2) * 365 *.($0:111 /18.19) = $62 Sales Tax Credit = $62 * 4.6458 = $288 ' Annual Credit for Gas Tax and Other Sources([:7:81 * 7.f2.* 1.0] /2) * 365 * ($0.211 /18.19) = $118 Gas Tax Credit = $118 * 18.4244 = $2174, Total Credit =$288 + $2,174 = $2,462 Net Impact Fee = $6,710 — $2,462,= $4,248 Total Impact Fee (with 2.5% admin fee) = $4,354\ A comparison of calculated fee schedule to the current adopted fee by land use is presented in Table X-7. The; detailed :fee schedule\,that: includes the calculations shown above is presented in Appendix E, Table E-1. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 117 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table X-7 Transportation Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC Land Use I _-_ RESIDENTIAL Unit- Total Impact Cost Irl Total Irl Credit Net Impact Fee 1+1 Admin. 131 _ Fee I Total Net Current I IO 151 Impact Fee. IL Fee l % , Change 210 Single Family Detached - Less than 1,500sf du 55,370 51,964 $3,406 $85 $3,491 53,048 15% - 1,500 to2,499sf du 56,710 52,462 $4,248 5106 54,354 54,595 -5% - 2,500sf or larger du 57,904 52,900 $5,004 5125 $5,129 55,157 -1% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du $4,369 51,627 52,742 569 52,811 52,489 13% 240 Mobile Home/RV (tied down) du 52,490 $940 51,550 $39 51,589 . 51,789 -11% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel mom 53,410 51,254 52,156 554 52,210 52,874 -23% 320 Motel mom 52,442 5918 51,524 538 $1,562 51,554 1% 620 Nursing Home bed $826 $332 5494 512 5506 $443 14% 252 Assisted Care Uving Facility(ACLF) bed 5910 $355 $555 514 5569 5636 -11% OFFICE& FINANCIAL 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000sf or less 1 1,000sf 515,277 $5,675 59,602 5240 $9,842 513,746 -28% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 522,258 $8,262 513,996 5350 514,346 513,746 456 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 517,815 57,304 51.0,511 5263 $10,774 510,900 -1% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 523,401 59,581 513,820 $346 514,166 513,346 6% 710 General Office 1,000sf 56,783 52,526 $4,257 5106 $4,363 53,893 1256 760 Research& Development Center 1,000 sf 55,040 51,876 $3,164 579 $3,243 52,868 13% INDUSTRIAL' 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 52,349 $876 $1,473 537 51,510 51,351 1256 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 52,189 $817 $1,372 534 51,406 51,259 12% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf $796 5313 $483 512 $495 5884 -44% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf $4,286 51,605 52,681 567 52,748 52,464 12% n/a Concrete Plant acre 511,600 $3,587 $8,013 5200 $8,213 55,517 49% n/a Sand Mining acre 51,487 $461 51,026 $26 $1,052 5707 4956 RETAIL' 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 510,680 " 54,320 . $6,360 $159 $6,519 $3,242 101% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. , $8,923 53,841 \ 55,082 5127 $5,209 55,727 -9% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 513,324 $5,030 $8,294 5207 58,501 510,361 -18% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf ' 534,060 513,417 520,643 5516 521,159 522,706 -7% 934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 578,855 533,391 $45,464 51,137 $46,601 535,651 31% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 515,628 56,593 $9,035 5226 $9,261 511,458 -19% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 510,632 $4,113 $6,519 5163 $6,682 58,026 -17% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay $8,454 $3,545 $4,909 5123 $5,032 514,954 -66% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf $42,534 519,282 523,252 $581 523,833 526,066 -9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 52,160 5793 51,367 534 51,401 51,407 0% RECREATIONAL: - 430 Golf Course hole , \ $27,636 510,121 517,515 5438 517,953 511,529 56% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 520,690 57,723 512,967 $324 513,291 511,095 20% 412 County Park acre ' 51,361 5502 $859 521 $880 5736 20% 491 Tennis Court court 524,315 59,079 515,236 5381 $15,617 512,485 25% 420 Marina boat berth 52,289 $835 51,454 536 $1,490 $997 49% GOVERNMENTAL 732 Post Office 1,000sf 525,310 59,452 515,858 5396 516,254 514,554 12% 590 Library - 1,000sf $41,072 515,045 526,027 5651 $26,678 518,373 45% 733 Govemment Office Complex 1,000sf 517,169 $6,409 510,760 $269 511,029 59,873 12% 571 Jail bed $3,382 51,273 52,109 553 52,162 $399 442% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 513,825 $5,865 57,960 5199 58,159 59,068 -10% 610 Hospital , \ 1,000sf 58,746 53,195 55,551 5139 $5,690 55,442 5% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 524,697 59,226 515,471 $387 515,858 53,599 341% 560 Church 1,000sf $4,150 51,586 52,564 564 52,628 52,653 -1% 444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 527,036 511,268 515,768 5394 $16,162 523,312 -31% 520 Elementary School (Private, 4-5) student 5576 5212 5364 59 5373 5153 144% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student 5814 5313 5501 513 5514 5153 23656 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 5859 $332 $527 513 5540 5551 -2% 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student 51,547 5562 5985 525 51,010 $669 51% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 51,260 5539 $721 518 $739 $1,008 -27% (1) Source: Appendix E, Table E-1 (2) Total impact cost less the total credit (3) Net impact fee multiplied by 2.5% to determine the administrative fee (4) Sum of the net impact fee (Item 2) and the administrative fee (Item 3) (5) Source: Indian River County; fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 118 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy As presented in Table X-6 and Appendix D, in addition to impact fees, the County will uses a combination of gas tax, sales tax, and grant revenues to fund the transportation system. In terms of affordable growth calculations, it is important to note the following: • Consistent with the methodology used by many Florida jurisdictions, impact fee calculations are based on the adopted LOS standard, which is lower than the current achieved LOS. In other words, under the`.current methodology, even with edr ao the full impact fee, unless the County uses coerk evenue sources, the current achieved LOS for the system will deteriorate and_ ore congestion will be experienced. It is Indian River Coynut policy to conNst a link -by -link capacity V analysis and ensure that no link dropsdbelow LOS standard e s such, affordable growth calculations are prepared using the current'fachieved LO '_- When the fee is calculated using the current achieved LOS 'it an°n o nts to $12,70 r a mid-size single family home, comparedFto'$,14,354 per home calculated using the adopted LOS standard. As such, the standard mef'hodology used�for transportation impact fees results in fee levels 10,`'6,''N ithat slowsodown the,dogrraadatioa°,othe system, but does not ® �, ''N, generate suffi%erit�revenues to maintain thpL��exi ting onditions when they are !ea, a -o stn.._ better thaNthe adopted OS standard' ' Ev Eks • As:,� eft oneed previously,.�=thaPia teredit calculations assume that the local option sales Etx w II not be re` -adopted in�2�019%,. 1n addition, the County had to defer `°maintenance expenses since,2006 through the CIP period due to lack of funding for °Qa ear,. ` c ciaHcity projects A As such,'�thkovailable revenues for transportation capacity are % • O :' a Iikely�to,_decrease in tie future The Affordable Growth calculations are based on this reduced funding and do not take into account funding from the State since the County does no.t con'tr'ol the State budget. If the sales tax is re -adopted or other revenue sources,Lbe ome available, these calculations will need to be revised. • Although the medium population projections from the University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) suggest an average growth rate of approximately 1.4 percent through 2040, the high projections indicate almost a 2 - percent annual growth rate. To mitigate the uncertainty of growth rates and given that even if adopted at 100 percent level, impact fees will not generate sufficient revenues to maintain the current LOS and that the transportation system will Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 119 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • continue to degrade, the high growth projection is used in the affordable growth • • calculations for the transportation impact fee. Based on this scenario, the County would need approximately 90 percent of the fee for all land uses, as long as an additional funding of $10 million per year is available for the next five years and $2.7 million per year afterwards, with an average annual population growth rate of 2 percent. As presented in Figure X-1, the red horizontal line represents the maximum technically acceptable fee. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of transportation impact fee calculated, if th,,historical levels of non -impact fee funding were to be continued, the County could adopt the<impact fee at approximately 90 percent for all land uses and continue to maintain theadopted Lstandard. \\., Alternatively, if the County adopts the residential land uses at 100 percent, the fees for non- residential land uses could be reduced by up to\55 percent (or adopted' at 45 percent) to maintain the adopted LOS standa�\s mentioned'previ u ly, the level ofdiscount is more of a policy decision and could be at any -level between the minimum levels calculated in this section and 100 percent. 120% 100% 80% 11- 60% s 40% 20% Figure X-1 Transpo'rtatiomlmpact Fee \Affordable Growth Strategy Adopted\LOS Standard-' IRC Average Annual Growth — Total Cost - Maximum Impact Fee LOS Curve 0% 0.00% 1.00% 2.0046 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.0046 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.0046 Annual Growth Rate Table X-8 presents discounted impact fee schedule. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 120 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table X-8 Transportation Impact Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth Scenariolt) ITE LUC Land Use RESIDENTIAL: Unit Affordable Growth 1 Adoption Rate'2 Total Net Impact Fee Current Impact Feel4l IL/ I Change 210 Single Family Detached - Less than 1,S00sf du 100% 53,491 53,048 15% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 100% $4,354 $4,595 -5% - 2,503 sf or larger du 100% 55,129 55,157 -1% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 100% $2,811 52,489 13% 240 Mobile Home/RV (tied down) du 100% 51,589 51,789 -11% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 45% 5994 $2,874 -65% 320 Motel room 45% 5703 51,554 -55% 620 Nursing Home bed 45% $228 $443 -49% 252 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF) bed 45% $256 $636 -60% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 45% $4,429 513,746 -68% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,030sf 1,000sf 45% 56,455 513,746 -53% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 45% $4,848 510,900 -56% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 45% $6,374 513,346 -52% 710 General Office 1,000 sf 45% $1,964 53,893 -50% 760 Research & Development Center 1,003sf 45% $1,460 52,868 -49% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,0:0 sf 45% 5680 51,351 -50% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 45% 5632 51,259 -50% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 45% $222 5884 -75% 110 General Light Industrial 1,003 sf 45% $1,236 52,464 -50% n/a Concrete Plant acre 45% $3,696 55,517 -33% n/a Sand Mining - acre 45% $474 5707 -33% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 45% 52,934 $3,242 -10% 944/ 946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 45% 52,344 55,727 -59% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 45% 53,825 510,361 -63% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 45% 59,521 522,706 -58% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 45% 520,970 535,651 -41% 850 Supermarket 1,C00 sf 45% 54,168 511,458 -64% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf 45% $3,007 58,026 -63% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 45% 52,264 514,954 -85% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps - 1,000 sf 45% $10,725 526,066 -59% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 45% $630 51,407 -55% RECREATIONAL: - 430 Golf Course hole 45% $8,079 511,529 -30% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 45% 55,981 $11,095 -46% 412 County Park acre 45% $397 $736 -46% 491 Tennis Court court 45% $7,027 512,485 -44% 420 _ _ Marina boat berth 45% 5670 5997 -33% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office - _ -- - 1,000sf 45% $7,314 514,554 -50% 590 Library 1,000sf 45% 512,005 518,373 -35% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf 45% $4,963 59,873 -50% 571 Jail bed 45% $973 5399 144% MISCELLANEOUS: - 565 Day Care Center - 1,000sf 45% $3,672 59,068 - 610 610 Hospital 1,000sf 45% $2,560 55,442 -53% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,003sf 45% $7,136 53,599 98% 560 Church 1,000sf 45% 51,183 52,653 -55% 444 Movie Theater w/Matinee screen 45% 57,273 523,312 -69% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 45% 5168 5153 10% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student 45% 5231 5153 51% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 45% $243 5551 -56% 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student 45% 5454 5669 -32% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 45% $332 $1,008 -67% (1) All fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee (2) Source: Calculated based on an average annual spending of $10 million for the next 5 years and $2.7 million per year afterwards, and an average annual growth rate of 2.0% over the next 25 years (3) Total net impact fee rates from Table X-7 (prior to admin fee) multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) (4) Source: Indian River County Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 121 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in developing the Indian River County transportation impact fee program, a comparison of calculated fees to transportation impact fee schedules adopted in other jurisdictions was completed. Table X-9 presents Indian River County's calculated impact fee and a comparison to transportation impact fees in the surrounding and other jurisdictions in Florida. It should be noted that the differences in fee levels for:a.g'iven land use can be caused by several factors, including the year of the technical stud.'y;;,adoption percentage, study methodology including variations in costs, credits,and travel, demand, land use categories included in the fee schedule, etc. ti Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 122 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table X-9 Transportation Impact Fee Comparison • I. 11 Land Uselinitltl 1 I Date of Last U.date Indian River County Affordable Growth Fee I Rate(3) 2013 Brevard County(s) 2000 �� Okeechobee l County(6) i 2012 St. Lucie County7l 2009 Charlotte Countyel J 2009 Citrus County(9) 2010 Collier County 10I 2010 Hernando Countylttl 2013 Highlands County t'I 2006 Martin County(t3) 2012 St. Johns County 2011 Calculated12/ 2013 Existing' 2009 Adoption Percentage 100% n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 44% 100% 100% 100% Residential: Sin le Famil 2,000sf du 54,354 54,354 54,595 54,353 5963 54,235 56,711 $1,985 55,753 52,537 56,594 52,815 54,408 Non -Residential: Li :ht Industrial 1,000sf 52,748 51,236 $2,464 n/a 5473 5390, \ $4,904 5628 54,333 51,611 54,663 51,857 51,522 Office 50,000s. ft) 1,000sf $4,363 51,964 53,893 55,058 51,091 rl t,`4 51,287 \",. 52,601 51,803 59,291 53,031 512,380 52,198 52,132 Retail (100,000s. ft) 1,000sf 56,519 52,934 53,242 55,270 51,194 :1;-' 52,503 59,717 51,487 510,980 53,769 59,821 55,183 53,777 Bankw/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 514,166 56,374 513,346 $23,331 51,194,'. 52,503 519,222 51,487 521,954 58,514 544,926 56,841 59,501 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $46,601 520,970 535,651 535,791 52,829 1111), 52,503. $15,967 51,487 $74,793 $34,795 $100,808 515,693 59,086 (1) Du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table X-7 (3) Source: Table X-8 (4) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown include a 2.5% administrative fee. (5) Source: Brevard County Planning & Development Department. Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through March'2014 (6) Source: Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners Administration Department (7) Source: St. Lucie County Ordinance Planning & Development Services Department; Average of four impact fee districts (8) Source: Charlotte County Community Development Department; Average of three impact fee districts (9) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department (10) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department _ - (11) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department; Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through August 2014 (12) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28; Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through June 2014" .- (13) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department (14) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 123 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Ap`pendixTV Poptilapon ... - ', • -'. , , ;,__ --....-i;•.-.-.... „ / . ‘... , . . ' . 2. 1 ..,. . . , ‘,..,. • ,- .. . / ‘.• - --.,-: .. -,`•,. • • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Population All impact fee program areas (except for educational facilities and transportation) require the use of population data in calculating current levels -of -service, performance standards, and future demand for capital facilities. With this in mind, a consistent approach to developing population estimates and projections is an important component of the data compilation process. To accurately determine demand for services, as well as to be consistent with Indian River County's Comprehensive ,Plan; not only the resident, or permanent population of the County, but also the seasonal residents and visitors were considered. Seasonal residents include visitors to, otel'and' motel facilities, visitors to RV parks, visitors that stay with relatives and friends; and part-time residents, which are defined as living in Indian River County for ,less,than six montheach year. Therefore, for , purposes of calculating future demand for, capital facilities for each impact fee program area, the weighted average seasonal population wil be used'in all population estimates and ` projections. References to population containedjn°'this.-report pertain to. the weighted ti_ average seasonal population, unless otherwise noted: Indian River County provides all of the services areas.,included'in the impact fee program countywide, with the exception`of the follgwing-three program areas: • Law enforcement, which,is:provided in unincorporatedlcounty; • Parks and recreation services, also provided only in unincorporated county; and • Emergency services,which-are`provided countywide with the exception of the Town " of-lndian River Shores ` ` Given the•,differences in services areas, population estimates are provided separately for these three area's. Table A-1 presents the'population trend for Indian River County. The projections indicate that the population of Indian River County is estimated to increase by 40 percent between 2013 and 2040 countywide. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 A-1 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-1 Weighted Population Trends and Projections Year Weighted Seasonal Population Figure Indian River County(�1 119,351 Unincorporated ( Indian River County(2) 75,723 IRC, Excluding Indian River Shores(3) 2000 115,707 2001 121,732 77,277 118,028 2002 124,110 78,824 120,426 2003 126,869 80,523 123,128 2004 131,175 84,000 ; 127,403 2005 134,573 86,741 == Yti' 130,792 2006 139,121 89,255C, I, 'K =. 135,292 2007 143,177 92,824 =-:'< '\, 139,413 2008 145,212 ,93,905` w,, 141,287 2009 145,356 = `-94;014 `" '1141,452 2010 145,854 :,',..46,546 =141;732. 2011 146,325 1 4., 96,955 142, 202 2012 147,118 ;`197,461 142,966''\ 2013 148,001 `97;681 > ° =`: 143,561''=, .-._ 2014 148,96'4='x:, 98,316y7,17 144,495 2015 150,081 .x ;1 _, 99,053 ;_ ; 145,578 2016 151,175' ; ; ='. ' '' _ 99,776 146,640 2017 152,612 100,724 } " - 148,034 2018 , --.----7,77' 154,214 101; 781'- = = . 149,588 2019/ ---==155,911 `, `, 462:§61.----;-*: -� " 151,234 2020:',7,- 157;705 _ ;.104,085 --- 152,974 202f 159,470 ',':.;105,250 154,686 2022 161;463_ \:.:1106,566 156,619 .'2023 .163,563 "; ., ' '`(107,951 158,656 ''2024. -:. `;=165,771 "`�: 109;409 160,797 20254r.-- `_, 16091 - ''110,940 163,049 2026 170,444`'4; 112,493 165,330 2027 ='-172,950`- 114,147 167,761 x.2028 ,=175,526 '`.."` 115,848 170,261 x2029 1178,124 117,562 172,780 2030 => 1807743 119,290 175,320 2031-( . /183381 121,032 177,880 2032 `= ` 186,031 122,781 180,450 2033 ` I ,1188,710 124,549 183,049 2034 191,428 126,342 185,685 2035 194,165 128,149 188,340 2036 196,923 129,969 191,015 2037 199,699 131,801 193,708 2038 202,495 133,647 196,420 2039 205,289 135,491 199,131 2040 208,079 137,332 201,837 (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-18 (2) Source Appendix A, Table A-21 (3) Source Appendix A, Table A-24 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County A-2 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Apportionment of Demand by Residential Unit Type and Size The residential land uses to be used for the impact fee calculations are the following: • Single Family • Multi-Family/Accessory Unit • Mobile Home/RV (tied down) Table A-2 presents the number of residents per housing unit for the residential categories identified above in Indian River County. This analysis.:includes all housing units, both occupied and vacant. To address fairness and equity issues between-land/uses'and°>to be consistent with the County's current fee schedules, the single family land use'-is'tiered based on three categories of square footage: less than 1,500 square feet, 1,500 to -2,499 square feet, and 2,500 square feet or greater. To accommodate the tiering --of impact'fee-assessments for the single family residential land use category, an analysiswas completed based on housing unit size and persons per housing unit. `:This analysis. utilized national data from the 2011 American Housing Survey (AHS) and date -from. the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census Reports to examine this relationship. - Because the,2010 Census data do-not>provide population by land use, a comparison .of weighted average pppu,lation,.per;housing units between the two Census data sets was'conducted 'and the'resulting ratio'wa"s' applied to the residents per housing unit figure for,each land use. Table A-2 ` Residents 'per Housing Unit (Countywide) Housing Type 1Housin Population('(' Units (2g Ratio131 I Residents / Housing Units(4) Residents / Housing Units with 2010Adjl5l Single Familys 86,733 36,240 2.39 2.23 - Less than 1,500 sf :` 92% 2.20 2.05 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf \; ` 100% 2.39 2.23 - 2,500 sf or greater ��-_ 111% 2.65 2.47 Multi-Famil /Accesso 19,533 14,792_ 1.32 1.23 Mobile Home 10,516 6,786 1.55 1.44 Weighted Average 116,782 57,818 2.02 1.88 (1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonal population) (2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30 (3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey (4) Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item 2) (5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County A-3 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-3 Residents per Housing Unit (Unincorporated IRC) Housing Type Single Family - Less than 1,500 sf - 1,500 to 2,499 sf - 2,500 sf or greater Multi-Famil /Accesso Mobile Home Weighted Average Population(1) 54,671 11,944 7,454 74,069 Housing Units 22,384 8,536 5,378 36,298 Ratio"' 92% 100% Residents / Housing Units'" 2.44 2.24 2.44 2.71 1.40 1.39 2.04 Residents / Housing Units with 2010Adj's' 2.27 2.09 2.27 2.53 1.30 1.30 1.90 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonal population)._ Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30 Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American•Housing Survey Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item 2)'r Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000,are,adjusted downward by 6.8.percent to reflect the decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 / { -Table A-4 Residents per Housing Unit ((RC -excluding Indian River Shores) Housing Type Single Family - Less than 1,500 sf - 1,500 to 2,499 sf,_ - 2,500 sf_ br greater;,--:',,, Multi-Famil %Accessory, Mobile Home Weighted Average Population('' 84,211 -„18,571 10,516 113;298 Housing Units(2) 34; 673 '13,513 =6, 786 54,972 Ratio(3) 92% 100% Residents/ Housing Units(4) 2.43 2.24 2.43 2.70 1.37 1.55 2.06 Residents / Housing Units with 2010Adj(5) 2.26 2.09 2.26 2.52 1.28 1.44 1.92 (1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H733:(adjusted:for peak seasonal population) (2) Source: 2000ensus, Table H-30 (3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey (4) Population (Item'1):divided by housing units (Item 2) (5) Residents per housing unit.liased`on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the decrease in people per housindunit between 2000 and 2010 Functional Population Functional population, as used in the impact fee analysis, is a generally accepted methodology for several impact fee areas and is based on the assumption that demand for certain facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people at a land use, including residents, employees, and visitors. It is not enough to simply add resident population to the Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 A-4 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study number of employees, since the service -demand characteristics can vary considerably by type of industry. Functional population is the equivalent number of people occupying space within a community on a 24 -hour -day, 7 -days -a -week basis. A person living and working in the community will have the functional population coefficient of 1.0. A person living in the community but working elsewhere may spend only 16 hours per day in the community on weekdays and 24 hours per day on weekends for a functional'population coefficient of 0.76 (128 -hour presence divided by 168 hours in one week)_! -: A person commuting into the county to work five days per week would have a functional,population coefficient of 0.30 (50 -hour presence divided by 168 hours in one week):= Similarly, a person traveling into the community to shop at stores, perhaps averaging•&hours per week; would have a functional population coefficient of 0.05. j_ \: , /`-'. > l * ALL` Functional population thus tries -,to capture `thie>,prese"n`ce of all people within the community, whether residents, worker's; or visitors, to.arrive at a total estimate of effective population need to be served. This form of adjusting population t� help measure' -real facility needs replaces the population approach of merely',weightingresidents two, thirds and workers one-third (Nelson and Nicholas 1992). By,estimating the functional and weighted population per unit of land use -across all major land uses,in a community, an estimate of the demand for certain ,facilities and services in the 'present,and future year can be calculated. The following paragraphs'.explain how\functional population is calculated for residential and non-resident al land uses Residential Functional Population Developing the residential component of functional population is simpler than developing the non-residential component. It is generally estimated that people spend one-half to three-fourths of their time'at home and the rest of each 24-hour day away from their place of residence. In developing the residential component of the Indian River County functional population, an analysis of the County's population and employment characteristics was conducted. Based on this analysis, it was estimated that people, on average, spend 16.4 hours, or approximately 68 percent, of each 24-hour day at their place of residence and the other 32 percent away from home. This analysis is presented in Tables A-5 and A-6. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 A-5 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-5 Indian River County Population & Employment Characteristics Item/Calculation Step Workers who live and work in Indian River County (2010)(1) Figure 47,755 Workers who live in Indian River County but work elsewhere (2010)(1) 8,560 Total workers living in Indian River County(2) 56,315 Indian River County Census Population (2010)(3) ; ", 138,028 Total workers as a •ercent of population(4) - 40.8% School age population (5-17 years) (2010)(5) ; 'f 19,444 School age population as a percent of population -(6), "_,, 14.1% Population net of workers and school age,popula(7) tion 62,269 Other population as a percent of total population ($) , `� 45.1% (1) Source Estimated based on data from the 2010 U.S. Census and the Bureau of: Transportation Statistics, Census Transportation Planning Package (CTOO) (2) Sum of workers who live/work.in,IRC and workers who.live elsewhere but work inIRC (3) Source: 2010 U.S. Census s (4) Total workers living in IRC (Item 2);divided by the census population (Item 3) (5) Source. 2010 U.S. Census (6) (7) School age population (Item 5) divided by the.census population; (Item 3) Census population.(Item.3) less total -,workers living ih Indian River. ,County (Item 2) and school age population.(Item 5) (8) Population net,of worker and school age.population (Item -7),d vided by census population (Item 3) '`4, 'Table A-6', • Residential`Coeffici nt for Functional Population Pop. Group Workers `: Hours at Residence(1) •, 13 Percent of Population (2) j 40.8% Effective Hours (3) 5.3 ,:-Students ( `- , 15 14.1% 2.1 ''Other,- k; 20 45.1% 9.0 Total Hours at Residence() 16.4 Residential Functional Population Coefficient(5) 68.3% (1) Source: Assumed (2) Source: Table A-5 (3) Hours at residence (Item 1) multiplied by percent of population (Item 2) (4) Sum of effective hours (Item 3) (5) Total hours at residence (Item 4) divided by 24 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County A-6 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study The resulting percentage from Table A-6 is used in the calculation of the residential coefficient for the 24-hour functional population. These actual calculations are presented in Table A-8. Non -Residential Functional Population Given the varying characteristics of non-residential land uses, developing the estimates of functional residents for non-residential land uses is more complicated than developing estimated functional residents for residential land uses. ,Nelson and Nicholas originally introduced a method for estimating functional ,-resident population, now used internationallyl. This method uses trip generation data;from.the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual and,'TOA's Trip\Characteristics Database, information of passengers per vehicle, workers per vehicle, length of,time spent at the land use, and other variables. Specific calculations include: /r • Total one-way trips per employee (ITE trips, Multiplied by 50 percent, to avoid double counting entering and exiting trips as two trips);; s; • Visitors per impact unit based'on occupants.per vehicle (trips multiplied by occupants per vehicle less emplo_yees).,--- , • Worker hours per;:;week per impact unit -,(such-, as nine worker -hours per day f multiplied'by five days in.a'work week). , • Visitor hours per week per impact unit (visitors multiplied by number of hours per day -hes -days ,in_ a week, such as five for offices and seven for retail shopping): . -- : •\ Functional population coefficients per employee developed by estimating time spent by.employees and'visitors at each land use. Table A-7 also shows the furietional population coefficients for non-residential uses in Indian River County. 'The/Junctional population coefficients in Table A-7 were used to estimate the County's 'funti nal population in Table A-8. 1 Arthur C. Nelson and James C. Nicholas, "Estimating Functional Population for Facility Planning," Journal of Urban Planning and Development 118(2): 45-58 (1992) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 A-7 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-7 General Functional Population Coefficients Population/ ITE LUC Employment Category Population Employee Hours In- Place'"' Trips per Employee"'' One -Way Trips per 131 Employee lourneyto• Work Occupants w1 per Trip Daily Occupants per ISI Trip Visitors per Em to celsl P V Visitor Hours erTri Isl I P p Days per Weekl'1 7.00 Functional Population p1 Coefficient 0.683 Natural Resources n/a 9.00 3.02 1.51 w.4..: • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-8 Countywide Functional Population — Year 2013 Population Category 2013 Weighted Population Indian Baseline River County Data(1) Functional Resident Coefficient(2) Functional Population(3) 148,001 0.683 101,085 Employment Category Natural Resources 4,228 0.379 1,602 Construction 3,560 0.271 965 Manufacturing 2,480 ) 0.270 670 Transportation, Communication, and Utilities 1,876 .;,/ 0.271 508 Wholesale Trade '> 926 � ' 0.271 251 Retail Trade _ `x, ,9,526 ' , 1.173 11,174 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate ) 8,066 -,_, 0.292 2,355 Services 7 32,704 .' 0.572 18,707 Government Services 5,772 ; f 0.497 2,869 Total Employment by Category Population(4) '.; - �`, / . - 39,101 2013 Total Functional Population(s) ' 140,186 (1) Source: Table A-1 for population and -2013 Woods & Poole for ern-ployment data (2) Source: Table A-7 • _ (3) The functional population is Indian River County baseline data (Item 1) multiplied by resident coefficient (Item •2) ti - (4) The total employment •population by category is the` sum of- the employment figures employment categories•(e.g., natural resources, construction, etc,) (5) The total functional, population' is; the sum of the `residential functional population employment functional population (39,101) the functional from the nine (101,085) and Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 A-9 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table A-9 Unincorporated County Functional Population — Year 2013 Population Category 2013 Weighted Population Indian River County Baseline Data(1) 97,681 Functional Resident Coefficient(2) 0.683 Functional Population(3) 66,716 Employment Category Natural Resources 2,832 0.379 1,073 Construction 1,730 0.271 469 Manufacturing 1,661 °'T"`3 0.270 448 Transportation, Communication, and Utilities 1,256 ./' 0.271 340 Wholesale Trade 560 `, 0.271 152 Retail Trade •, 5,766 - . 1.173 6,764 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate ,' 3,919 - ''"-\ 0.292 1,144 Services ,t 15,891 • `., 0.572 9,090 Government Services , 2,805 ' 0.497 1,394 Total Employment by Category Population(4) ,, ' ;�, - ,, 20,874 2013 Total Functional Population's) -, 87,590 (1) (2) Source: Table A-7 Source: Table A-1 for population and 2013;Woods & Poole for employment data (3) The functional population is Indian RIVei County_ baseline data -(Item 1) multiplied by the functional resident coefficient (Item -2)- ti (4) The total employment .population by category is the sum of the employment figures from the nine employment categories (e.g., natural resource`s; construction, (5) The total functional'_population is the sum of the residential -functional population (66,716) and employment functional population (20,874) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County A-10 Impact Fee Update Study i • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-10 IRC excluding Indian River Shores Functional Population — Year 2013 Population Category 2013 Weighted Population Indian River CountyFunctional Baseline Data(1) 143,561 Resident Coefficient 0.683 Functional Population (31 98,052 Employment Category Natural Resources 4,189 0.379 1,588 Construction 3,469 0.271 940 Manufacturing 2,457 ;'`5 0.270 663 Transportation, Communication, and Utilities 1,859 ; 0.271 504 Wholesale Trade } 912- 0.271 247 Retail Trade . ` .9,387 , t: • ,„ 1.173 11,011 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate `: 7,859 \, 0.292 2,295 Services - . = 31,867 ' - 0.572 18,228 Government Services `;, 5,624 ' '\, 0.497 2,795 Total Employment by Category Population(4) =;_ A ` �. 38,271 2013Total,Functional Population(5) f 136,323 (1) (2) (3) Source: Table A-1 for population and 2013,Woods & Poole for employment data Source. Table A-7 . The functional population is Indian River' C ounty baseline data •(Item 1) multiplied by the functional resident coefficient (Item -2) ,, (4) The total employment ;population by category is the',sum of the emplo ayment figures from the nine employment categories (e.g., natural resources, construction, etc.),' - (5) The total functional' population; -is'',, the sum 'of ;the} residential functional population (98,052) and employment functional population (38,271) Table`A41 presents the County's. annual functional population figures from 2000 through 2040, based on the 2013 functional population figures from Tables A-8 through A-10 and the annual -population growth\rates th\rates from the population figures previously presented in Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County A-11 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-11 Indian River County Functional Population (2000-2040) Year Functional Population Unincorporated Indian River Counte IRC Excluding Indian River Shores(3) Indian River _-T- Counte 2000 113,139 70,691 - 110,023 2001 115,402 72,105 112,223 2002 117,710 73,547 114,467 2003 120,300 75,165 116,985 2004 124,390 77,721 , / \-. 120,962 2005 127,624 79,742 , 124,107 2006 131,963 82,453,, A 128,327 2007 135,790 84,844:.. ',1- 132,048 2008 137,691 86,0321 . 133,897 2009 137,829 , , 86418 "134,031 2010 138,242 / ,,' ;86,376 ',13 4,433 2011 138,657 `, ••, 86,635 134,836 2012 139,350 , -. '87,068 ,,�: 135,510 --ti 2013 140,186 87,590 136,323 2014 141,167 ^ 88',203 137,277 \ ,_:' 2015 142,155 ".. " 88,820-.. 138,238 2016 143,150 • \, 89,442 ''1 139,206 2017 144,582 ' , , -90,336 140,598 2018 =.;-__ 146,172 , , 91;330- . `, 142,145 2019 - '.!-:- z_. 147,780 .92; 335 ,, .'..ti • -- 143,709 2020 , _- 149,553 - . 93;443 145,434 2021: • 151,198 .•94,471 147,034 2022 "_ ... 153,164 "95,699 148,945 --- -.2023 . '•"._155,155 �- •,:96,943 150,881 2024`2 `ti. 15T172 - '-._ • ; `.- . '98;203 152,842 2025= . -- >: 159,372 `" : ' ''99,578 154, 982 2026 = -- 161',603':, ' 100,972 157,152 2027 •' ; ;'..\164,027 -, ._ 102,487 159,509 \ 2028 °, '166,487 '` . T 104,024 161,902 ' -2029 '',168,984 105,584 164,331 '2030,, "1712;519 107,168 166,796 263f:;'2:. .2-174;092 108,776 169,298 2032 "• :‘`.,' ' 176,529 110,299 171,668 2033 -. -7 179,000 111,843 174,071 2034 J 181,506 113,409 176,508 2035 184,047 114,997 178,979 2036 186,624 116,607 181,485 2037 189,237 118,239 184,026 2038 191,886 119,894 186,602 2039 194,572 121,573 189,214 2040 197,296 123,275 191,863 (1) Source: Table A-8 for 2013 total functional population (2) Source: Table A-9 for 2013 total functional population (3) Source: Table A-10 for 2013 total functional population Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County A-12 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Functional Residents by Specific Land Use Category When a wide range of land uses impact services, an estimate of that impact is needed for each land use. This section presents functional population estimates by residential and non-residential land uses. Residential and Transient Land Uses As previously mentioned, the average number of persons per housing unit in Indian River County was calculated for the single family, multi -family, and, mobile home/RV land uses, based on information obtained from the 2000 and 2010,U.S. Census. Besides the residential land uses, the table also includes transient land uses, such-as.hotels, motels, nursing homes, and assisted care living facilities (ACLF). Secondaryysources, such as the IRC Chamber of Commerce and the Florida Department of, Elderly Affairs, are used to determine the occupancy rate for hotels, motels, and nursing homes/ACCP land uses. As mentioned before, different functional population coefficients must -be developed;hfor each of the impact fee service areas to be analyzed. For residential) and transient'land uses, these coefficients are displayed in Tables:A-12 through A-14. Non -Residential Land Uses,„ A similar approach is `used to estimate ••functional 'residents for>non-residential land uses. Table A-15 reports .basic assumptions and 'calculations, such as trips per unit, trips per employee, employees :per impact unit, one-way trips per impact unit, worker hours, occupanthicle trip, visitors :(pa s -per vetrons, etc:) -per impact unit, visitor hours per trip, and days,per week for "non-residential land uses:.The final column in the tables shows the estimated functional resident coefficients by land use. These coefficients by land use create the demand component',for\ the `certain impact fee programs and will be used in the calculation `of'the cost per unit for each land use category in the select impact fee schedules. t Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County A-13 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table A-12 Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses - Countywide • Residential Land Use,Visitors Residential 1 Impact Unit ITE LUC(l Residents/Adjusted Per Unit(2) Occupancy Rate(3) Residents per Unit(4l Peak Visitor Hours at Place(sl ii Workers ' Per Unit(6) Work Day Hours(7) Days Per Weeklr' ' Work Week Residents Per Unit(9) Single Family Detached - Less than 1,500 sf du 210 2.05 ir` ,),„. 1.40 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 210 2.23 , , , `4 -. • 1.52 - 2,500 sf or greater du 210 2.47 ,\', 1.69 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 220 1.23 ''- 0.84 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 240 . - ,. 1.44 �, 0.98 Transient, Assisted, Group Hotel room 310 ,\ `'1.70 51% , 0.87 12 0.57 9 7 0.65 Motel room 320 ' 1.7,0 51% ''0:87, 12 0.44 9 7 0.60 Nursing Home/ACLF bed 252/620 '1.00. 91% ,, 0.91 16 0.84 9 7 0.92 (1) Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Enginee s (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (2) Estimates for the single family, multi -family, and mobile home land use from Table A-2, estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes (3) Source for hotel/motel occupancy- Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy rate for 2007 through 2012. Source for nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate is the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, Indian County Profile. Average occupancy rate for 2011 and 2012 (4) Residents per unit times occupancy rate (5), (7), (8) Estimated (6) Adapted from ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (9) For residential this is Residents Per Unit times 0.683 For Transient, Assisted, and Group it is (IAdiusted Residents Der Unit X Hours at Place X Days oer Week) + (Workers PPr UnitX Work Hours Per Dav X Days oer Weekll ( 24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week) 1, Iy �l1 ,ttri Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 A-14 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-13 Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses — Unincorporated County • Residential Land Use Residential Impact I Unit 1 ITE LUC(1) Residents/ Visitors Per i Unit(�l Occupancy Rate(3l Adjusted Residents Per Unit(4) Peak Visitor Hours at Place Workers Per Unit(bl Work Day Hours(7l Days Per Week(ej Work Week I1 Residents Per Unit Single Family Detached - Less than 1,500sf du 210 2.09 . • 'f' 1.43 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 210 2.27 r,, .' *w`7' 1.55 - 2,500 sf or greater du 210 2.53 .' . 1.73 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 220 1.30 ` 0.89 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 240 1.30 `Y>_ 0.89 Transient, Assisted, Group Hotel room 310 "1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.57 9 7 0.65 Motel room 320 '','1.70 ' - • '51% ' 0.87 •,_ 12 0.44 9 7 0.60 Nursing Home/ACLF bed 620 L00. ''91% ;;w 0.9i - ;, 16 0.84 9 7 0.92 (1) Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Engi nee s (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (2) Estimates for the single family, multi -family, and mobile home land use from Table A-3, estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions. One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes (3) Source for hotel/motel occupancy. Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy rate for 2007 through 2012 Source for nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate is the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, Indian County Profile. Average occupancy rate for 2011 and 2012. (4) Residents per unit times occupancy rate (5), (7), (8) Estimated (6) Adapted from ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (9) For residential this is Residents Per Unit times 0.683 For Transient, Assisted, and Group it is )(Adjusted Residents oer Unit XHours at Place X Days oer Weekl + (Workers Per Unit Work Hours Per Dav X Days oer Weekll ( 24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 A-15 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-14 Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses — IRC excluding Indian River Shores Residential Land Use Residential 11 I Impact �; ITE Unit l'i LUC() i 1 Residents/ ! Visitors Per 1 12) t Unit t I Occupancy I I Rate(3) I Adjusted Residents (4) Per Unit Peak Visitor Hours at (s) Place Workers Per Unit(6) Work Day Hours(7) Days Per Week Work Week Residents Per Unit I9) Single Family Detached - Less than 1,500 sf du 210 2.09 ` I.; 1.43 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 210 2.26 ✓' \F> 1.54 - 2,500 sf or greater du 210 2.52 'N` ,,, 1.72 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 220 1.28 '�, .,T' y •w y,t='`: 0.87 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 240 1.44 ' 0.98 Transient, Assisted, Group Hotel room 310 ',, . 170 , 51% °, • 0:87 12 0.57 9 7 0.65 Motel room 320 ' 1.70 ' - 51% '0.87 , 12 0.44 9 7 0.60 Nursing Home/ACLF bed 620 1.00 '91% 0.91: 16 0.84 9 7 0.92 (1) Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Enginee s (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (2) Estimates for the single family, multi -family, and mobile home land use from Table A-4, estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes (3) Source for hotel/motel occupancy. Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy rate for 2007 through 2012. Source for nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate is the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, Indian County Profile. Average occupancy rate for 2011 and 2012. (4) Residents per unit times occupancy rate (5), (7), (8) Estimated (6) Adapted from ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (9) For residential this is Residents Per Unit times 0.683 For Transient, Assisted, and Group it is I(Adiusted Residents per Unit X Hours at Place X Days oer Weekl + (Workers Per Unit X Work Hours Per Dav X Days oer Weekll ( 24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 A-16 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table A-15 Functional Residents for Non -Residential Land Uses ITE LUC Irl Land Use Office & Financial 11 11 11 Impact Unit !i I 1 Trips Per 121 Unit 1 it Trips Per 131 Employee I Employees Per Unit (<1 One -Way Factor @ 50•� (s) Worker e1 Hours Occupants Per Trip P1 Visitors(°1 I Visitor I1 Days Per Hours Per (rot Trip(g) �' Week Trip a Functional Resident Coefficient pr1 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 23.83 8.91 2.67 11.92 9 1.42 14.26 1.00 5 1.14 720 Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 34.72 8.91 3.90 17.36 9 1.42 20.75 1.00 5 1.66 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 121.30 34.69 3.50 60.65 9 1.52 88.69 0.35 6 2.23 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 159.34 30.94 5.15 79.67 9 1.52 115.95 0.15 6 2.28 710 General Office 1,000sf 11.03 3.32 3.32 5.52 9 1.28 3.75 1.00 5 1.00 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 2.77 2.93 4.06 9 1.28 2.27 1.00 5 0.85 Industrial 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 3.82 ,) ti2:13 1.79 1.91 9 1.38 0.85 1.00 5 0.50 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 3.56 '1103.89 0.92 1.78 9 1.38 1.54 0.75 5 0.28 151 Mini-Warehouse/Storage 1,000sf 2.15 61:90 .110.03 1:08, 9 1.38 1.46 0.75 7 0.06 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf ,..6.97 3202 1.4 ?1 2.31 3.49 9 1.38 2.51 1.00 5 0.69 n/a Concrete Plant acre 15.60 ., 3.0211i111' 5.17 7.80 9 1.38 5.59 1.00 5 1.55 n/a Sand Mining acre 200'-' -T=_ 3.02 41;'.II 0.66 1.00 9 1.38 0.72 1.00 5 0.20 Retail 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 42.70 n/a - 230;F1, 21.35 9 1.73 34.44 1.00 7 2.37 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 157.33 ' - -n/a 2.50 78.67 9 1.52 117.08 0.20 7 1.91 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 28.25 21.14 ' 1.34 14.13 9 1.73 23.10 1.00 7 1.47 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 116.60 - n/a 9.92 58.30 9 1.85 97.94 0.75 7 6.78 934 Fast Food Rest w/ Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 511.00 n/a 10.90 255.50 9 1.85 461.78 0.25 7 8.90 850 Supermarket 1,000sf - 103.38 ' ,87.82 1.18 51.69 9 1.52 77.39 0.50 7 2.05 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf ''. .31.43 n/a 1.50 15.72 9 1.52 22.39 1.00 7 1.50 947 Self -Service Car Wash '' service bay `43.94 n/a 0.50 21.97 9 1.52 32.89 0.50 7 0.87 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf . - 775.14 n/a 2.50 387.57 9 1.52 586.61 0.20 7 5.83 890 Furniture Store . 1,000sf 5.06 12.19 0.42 2.53 9 1.52 3.43 0.50 7 0.23 - Recreational 430 Golf Course hole 35.74 20.52 1.74 17.87 9 2.39 40.97 0.25 7 1.08 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf ' 32.93 n/a 2.00 16.47 9 2.39 37.36 1.50 7 3.09 412 County Park acre 2.28 n/a 0.10 1.14 9 2.39 2.62 1.50 7 0.20 491 Tennis Court court 38.70 45.71 0.85 19.35 9 2.39 45.40 1.50 7 3.16 420 Marina berth 2.96 20.52 0.14 1.48 9 2.39 3.40 1.00 7 0.19 Govemmental 732 Post Office 1,000 sf 108.19 25.37 4.26 54.10 9 1.28 64.99 0.25 5 1.62 590 Library 1,000sf 56.24 52.52 1.07 28.12 9 1.20 32.67 1.00 7 1.76 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf 27.92 7 75 3.60 13.96 9 1.28 14.27 1.00 5 1.39 571 Jail bed 5.50 2.50 2.20 2.75 9 1.20 1.10 1.00 7 0.87 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 A-17 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table A-15 (continued) Functional Residents for Non -Residential Land Uses ITE E1 L Land Use Impact Unit TripsPer ips Per loyees Emrployeei3l� Per Unit"" Fact050%r@ Worker Hours(6) PerTnplyS� Visitors(8) HouTrs Per Days Per ! Week(m) I es l Coefficient.'"Resident Miscellaneous 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 71.88 26.73 2.69 35.94 9 1.11 37.20 0.15 5 0.89 610 Hospital 1,000sf 13.22 4.50 2.94 6.61 9 1.42 6.45 1.00 7 1.37 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 40.12 n/a 4.05 20.06 9 1.42 24.44 1.00 7 2.54 560 Church 1,000sf 9.11 20.64 0.44 4.56 9 1.90 8.22 1.00 7 0.51 444 Movie Theater w/Matinee screen 106.63 53.12 ' 2.01 53.32 9 2.39 125.42 1.00 7 5.98 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 1.29 15.71 0.08 0.65 9 1.11 0.64 2.00 5 0.06 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 1.62 16:39 0.10 0.81 9 1.11 0.80 2.00 5 0.07 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 1.71 ,1)119:74 0.09 ` `\ 0.86 9 1.11 0.86 2.00 5 0.08 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 2.00 41112.26 0.16 1.00 9 1.11 0.95 2.00 5 0.10 n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 5.40 `'. n/a 0.70 2.70 9 1.20 2.54 3.50 7 0.63 Sources. (1) Land use code found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (2) Land uses and trip generation rates consistent with those included in the 2013 Transportation Impact Fee Update Study (3) Trips per employee from ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition, when available (4) Trips per impact unit divided by trips per person (usually employee). When trips per person are not available, the employees per unit is estimated. (5) Trips per unit (Item 2) multiplied by 50 percent (6), (9), (10) Estimated (7) Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey (8) [(One-way Trips/Unit X Occupants/Trip) - Employees). (11) [(Workers X Hours/Day X Days/Week) + (Visitors X Hours/Visit X Days/Week)1/(24 Hours x 7 Days) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 A-18 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections (Countywide): Table A-16 Table A-17 IRC Permanent Po • ulation Projections IRC Seasonal Population Pro ections Permanent Year Population 2000 112,947 2001 115,200 2002 117,450 2003 120,062 2004 124,137 2005 127,352 2006 131,656 2007 135,494 2008 137,420 2009 137,557 2010 138,028 2011 138,694 2012 139,446 2013 140,283 2014 141,195 2015 142,254 2016 143,463 2017 144,826 2018 146,347 2019 147,957 2020 149,659 2021 151,455 2022 153,348 2023 155,342 2024 157,439 2025 159,643 2026 161,942 2027 164,323 2028 166,771 2029 169,239 2030 171,727 2031 174,234 2032 176,752 2033 179,297 2034 181,879 2035 184,480 2036 187,100 2037 189,738 2038 192,394 2039 195,049 2040 197,700 Year 2000 Permanent Population 112,947 Seasonal Population 15,248 2001 2001 15,552 2002 121,732 15,856 2003 6,660 16,208 2004 120,062 16,758 2005 2004 17,193 2006 131,175 17,774 2007 7,221 18,292 2008 131,656 18,552 2009 2007 18,570 2010 143,177 18,634 2011 7,792 18,169 2012 137,557 18,267 2013 2010 18,377 2014 145,854 18,497 2015 7,631 18,635 2016 139,446 18,363 2017 2013 18,538 2018 148,001 18,732 2019 7,769 18,938 2020 142,254 19,156 2021 2016 19,083 - 2022 151,175 19,322 2023 7,786 19,573 2024 146,347 19,837 , 2025 2019 20,115 i 2026 155,911 20,243. 2027 8,046 20,540 2028 151,455 20,846 2029 ,'2022 21,155 2030 161,463 21,466 2031 8,221 21,779 2032 157,439 22,094 2033 2025 22,412 2034 168,091 22,735 2035 8,502 23,060 2036 164,323 23,388 2037 2028 23,717 2038 175,526 24,049 2039 8,885 24,381 2040 ' 24,713 Table A-18 IRC Weighted Seasonal Population Projections Year 2000 Permanent Population 112,947 Seasonal Population 6,404 I -Total Season Pop. 119,351 2001 115,200 6,532 121,732 2002 117,450 6,660 124,110 2003 120,062 6,807 126,869 2004 124,137 7,038 131,175 2005 127,352 7,221 134,573 2006 131,656 7,465 139,121 2007 135,494 7,683 143,177 2008 137,420 7,792 145,212 2009 137,557 7,799 145,356 2010 138,028 7,826 145,854 2011 138,694 7,631 146,325 2012 139,446 7,672 147,118 2013 140,283 7,718 148,001 2014 141,195 7,769 148,964 2015 142,254 7,827 150,081 2016 143,463 7,712 151,175 2017 144,826 7,786 152,612 2018, 146,347 7,867 154,214 2019 147,957 7,954 155,911 2020 149,659 8,046 157,705 2021 151,455 8,015 159,470 ,'2022 153,348 8,115 161,463 2023 155,342- 8,221 163,563 2024 157,439 8,332 165,771 2025 159,643 8,448 168,091 2026 161,942 8,502 170,444 2027 ', 164,323 8,627 172,950 2028 166,771 8,755 175,526 2029 169,239 8,885 178,124 2030 171,727 9,016 180,743 2031 174,234 9,147 183,381 2032 176,752 9,279 186,031 2033 179,297 9,413 188,710 2034 181,879 9,549 191,428 2035 184,480 9,685 194,165 2036 187,100 9,823 196,923 2037 189,738 9,961 199,699 2038 192,394 10,101 202,495 2039 195,049 10,240 205,289 2040 197,700 10,379 208,079 Notes: Table A-16: BEBR-Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates Table A-17- Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040 Table A-18: Seasonal population from Table A-17 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the year (assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months = 0.42). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 A-19 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections (Unincorporated County): Table A-19 Table A-20 Table A-21 IRC Permanent Population Projections IRC Seasonal Po •ulation Pro ections IRC Weighted Seasonal Population Projections Year Permanent Population 2000 71,660 2001 73,130 2002 74,595 2003 76,202 2004 79,493 2005 82,087 2006 84,466 2007 87,843 2008 88,866 2009 88,969 2010 91,366 2011 91,899 2012 92,378 2013 92,587 2014 93,189 2015 93,888 2016 94,686 2017 95,585 2018 96,589 2019 97,652 2020 98,775 2021 99,960 '2022 101,210 2023 102,526 2024 103,910 2025 105,364 2026 106,882 2027 108,453 2028 110,069 _ 2029 111,698 2030 113,340 2031 114,994 2032 116,656 2033 118,336 2034 120,040 ' 2035 121,757 2036 123,486 2037 125,227 2038 126,980 2039 128,732 2040 130,482 Year Population Seasonal 2000 9,674 2001 9,873 2002 10,070 2003 10,287 2004 10,732 2005 11,082 2006 11,403 2007 11,859 2008 11,997 2009 12,011 2010 12,334 2011 12,039 2012 12,102 2013 12,129 2014 12,208 2015 12,299 2016 12,120 2017 12,235 2018 12,363 2019 12,499 2020 12,643 2021 12,595 2022 12,752 2023 12,918 2024 13,093 2025 13,276 2026 13,360 2027 13,557 2028 13,759` 2029 , 13,962 , 2030 ' 14,167 2031 14,374 2032 14,582 2033 14,792 2034 15,005 2035 15,220 2036 15,436 2037 15,653 '2038 15,873 2039 16,092 2040 16,310 Year 2000 __- Permanent Population l _ 71,660 Seasonal Population _ 4,063 Total � Weighted 1_ Season Pop. 75,723 2001 73,130 4,147 77,277 2002 74,595 4,229 78,824 2003 76,202 4,321 80,523 2004 79,493 4,507 84,000 2005 82,087 4,654 86,741 2006 84,466 4,789 89,255 2007 87,843 4,981 92,824 2008 88,866 5,039 93,905 2009 88,969 5,045 94,014 2010 91,366 5,180 96,546 2011 91,899 5,056 96,955 2012 92,378 5,083 97,461 2013 92,587 5,094 97,681 2014 93,189 5,127 98,316 2015 93,888 5,166 99,053 2016 94,686 5,090 99,776 2017 95,585 5,139 1C0,724 2018 96,589 5,192 101,781 2019 ' 97,652 5,250 102,901 2020 ' ' 98,775 5,310 104,085 2021 99,960 5,290 105,250 2022 101,210 5,356 106,566 2023 102,526 5,426 107,951 2024 103,910 5,499 109,409 2025 105,364 5,576 110,940 2026 106,882 5,611 112,493 2027 108,453 5,694 114,147 2028 110,069 5,779 115,848 2029 111,698 5,864 117,562 2030 113,340 5,950 119,290 2031 114,994 6,037 121,032 2032 116,656 6,124 122,781 2033 118,336 6,213 124,549 2034 120,040 6,302 126,342 2035 121,757 6,392 128,149 2036 123,486 6,483 129,969 2037 125,227 6,574 131,801 2038 126,980 6,667 133,647 2039 128,732 6,759 135,491 2040 130,482 6,850 137,332 Notes: Table A-19: BEBR-Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates. Unincorporated population is assumed to be 66 percent of the total population based on the average ratio of unincorporated population to total population from the previous five years. Table A-20: Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040 Table A-21. Seasonal population from Table A-19 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the year (assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months = 0.42). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 A-20 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores): Table A-22 Table A-23 Table A-24 IRC Permanent Po • ulation Projections 2000 Permanent Population 109,499 2001 111,695 2002 113,964 2003 116,521 2004 120,567 2005 123,774 2006 128,033 2007 131,932 2008 133,706 2009 133,862 2010 134,127 2011 134,786 2012 135,510 2013 136,075 2014 136,959 2015 137,986 2016 139,159 2017 140,481 2018 141,957 2019 143,518 2020 145,169 2021 146,911 2022 148,748 2023 150,682 2024 152,716 2025 154,854 2026 157,084 2027 159,393 2028 161,768 2029 164,162 2030 166,575 2031 169,007 2032 171,449 2033 173,918 2034 176,423 2035 178,946 2036 181,487 2037 184,046 2038 186,622 2039 189,198 2040 191,769 Year 2000 Year 2000 Population Seasonal 14,782 2001 2001 6,333 15,079 2002 2002 6,462 15,385 2003 2003 6,607 15,730 2004 2004 6,836 16,277 2005 2005 7,018 16,709 2006 2006 7,259 17,284 2007 2007 7,481 17,811 2008 2008 7,581 18,050 2009 2009 7,590 18,071 2010 2010 7,605 18,107 2011 2011 7,416 17,657 2012 2012 7,456 17,752 2013 2013 7,487 17,826 2014 2014 7,536 17,942 2015 2015 7,592 18,076 2016 2016 7,481 17,812 2017 2017 7,552 17,982 2018. 2018 7,631 18,170 2019 2019 7,715 18,370 2020 2020 7,804 18,582 2021 2021 7,775 18,511 /2022 2022 7,872 18,742 2023 2023 7,974 18,986 2024 2024 8,082 19,242 2025 2025 8,195 19,512 , 2026 2026 8,247 19,635 2027 ', 2027 - . 8,368 19,924 2028 ' 2028 8,493 20,221 2029 2029 , '20,520 2030 2030 8,745 20,822 2031 2031 8,873 21,126 2032 2032 9,001 21,431 2033 2033 9,131 21,740 2034 2034 ', 9,262 22,053 2035 2035 9,395 22,368 2036 2036 9,528 22,686 ` 2037 , 23,006 2038 2038 ; 23,328 2039 2039 9,933 23,650 2040 2040. 10,068 23,971 Year 2000 - -i 4- Permanent Population 109,499 - c Seasonal Population 6,208 1 Weighted Total 1 Season Pop. 115,707 2001 111,695 6,333 118,028 2002 113,964 6,462 120,426 2003 116,521 6,607 123,128 2004 120,567 6,836 127,403 2005 123,774 7,018 130,792 2006 128,033 7,259 135,292 2007 131,932 7,481 139,413 2008 133,706 7,581 141,287 2009 133,862 7,590 141,452 2010 134,127 7,605 141,732 2011 134,786 7,416 142,202 2012 135,510 7,456 142,966 2013 136,075 7,487 143,561 2014 136,959 7,536 144,495 2015 137,986 7,592 145,578 2016 139,159 7,481 146,640 2017 140,481 7,552 148,034 2018. 141,957 7,631 149,588 2019 143,518 7,715 151,234 2020 145,169 7,804 152,974 2021 146,911 7,775 154,686 /2022 148,748 7,872 156,619 2023 150,682' 7,974 158,656 2024 152,716 8,082 160,797 2025 154,854 8,195 163,049 2026 157,084 8,247 165,330 2027 ', 159,393 8,368 167,761 2028 ' 161,768 8,493 170,261 2029 164,162 8,618 172,780 2030 166,575 8,745 175,320 2031 169,007 8,873 177,880 2032 171,449 9,001 180,450 2033 173,918 9,131 183,049 2034 176,423 9,262 185,685 2035 178,946 9,395 188,340 2036 181,487 9,528 191,015 2037 184,046 9,663 193,708 2038 186,622 9,798 196,420 2039 189,198 9,933 199,131 2040 191,769 10,068 201,837 Notes: Table A-22: BEER -Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates. Population excluding Indian River Shores is assumed to be 97 percent of the total population based on the average ratio of the population excluding Indian River Shores to the total population from the previous five years. Table A-23: Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040 Table A-24: Seasonal population from Table A-22 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the year (assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months = 0.42). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 A-21 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Appendix B Transportation=Impact Fee Demand'Compo'nent Calculations Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Demand Component This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the demand component of the transportation impact fee update. Interstate and Toll Facility Discount Factor Table B-1 presents the interstate and toll facility discount factor used in the calculation of the transportation impact fee. This variable is based on,data from the Greater Treasure Coast regional travel demand model, specifically the 2035 "projected vehicle miles of travel, accounting for roadway improvements included in.'the7-2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. It should be noted that discount factor. excludes external -to -external trips, which represent traffic that goes through Indian River County, but doesznot.necessarily stop in the y county. This traffic is excluded from fhb' ,calculations since it ;does not come from development within the county. The I/T discountlactor isfused to reduce the VMT that the impact fee charges for each land use., `Table B-1 Interstate/Toll. Facility Discount Factor Roadway i-95 &Turnpike (SR 19) Other..Roads Total'(AII Roads Total (Interstate/Toll-Roads) VMT (2035) 838,813 4,005, 935 4,844,247 838,313 % VMT 17.3% 82.7% 100.0% 17.3% Source: Greater: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model v3.4 ) Single FamilikResidential Trip Generation Rate Tiering As part of this study,,an update.to the tiering of the assessed impact fee for the single family residential (detachedYland'use; to ensure equity by size of home, is included. To facilitate this, an analysis was completed on the comparative relationship between housing size and household travel behavior. This analysis utilized data from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) and the 2011 American Housing Survey (AHS) to examine overall trip - making characteristics of households in the United States. Table B-2 presents the existing trip characteristics being utilized in the current adopted impact fee schedule for the single family (detached) land use. The 2009 NHTS database was used to assess average annual household vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for various annual Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 B-1 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study household income levels. In addition, the 2011 AHS database was used to compare median annual family/household incomes with housing unit size. It is important to recognize that the use of the income variable in each of these databases is completed simply to provide a convenient linking mechanism between household VMT from the NHTS and housing unit size from the AHS. Table B-2 Calculated Single Family Trip Characteristics Calculated Values Excluding Tiering Single Family (Detached) Trip Rate 7.81 Assessable _ Trip Length /6:62 Daily VMT; Ratio to Mean 51.70 1.00 Source: FL Studies for LUC 210, shown later in this "appendix y, The results of the NHTS and AHS analyses are included in Tables B-3 and -,.B-4. First, the data shown in Table B-3 indicates that the average income in=the U.S. for "families/households living in housing units between 1,500 and 2,499. square= feet in size ($62,563) is slightly lower than the overall average income for the U.S: -($62,831). Then, in Table B-4, annual average household VMT was calculated from -the NHTS database for a number of different income levels and raged related to the.resulting-AHS income data in Table B-3. TableyB-3 Calculated‘Single Family Trip Characteristics 2011 AHS Average Income 1 Data by Housing Size 1 Annual Income(1) Lesthan1,500 sf'-' =. '; Daily VMT $42,156 1,500 id 2,499 sf Average of $42,156 $62,563 2,500 sf or more 52.72 $79,443 Average of All Houses Total (All Homes) $62,831 Source: 2011 American Household Survey i Table B-4 `NHTS VMT Annual VMT by Income Category 2009 NHTS Travel Data by Annual HH Income Annual I VMT/HH — Days Daily VMT Ratio to Mean Normalized to 0.995 Average of $42,156 19,241 365 52.72 0.796 0.800 Total (All Homes) 24,181 365 66.25 1.000 Average of $62,563 24,053 365 65.90 0.995 1.000 Average of $79,443 28,349 365 77.67 1.172 1.178 Source: 2009 National Household Travel Survey Database, Federal Highway Administration Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County B-2 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study To calculate a corresponding trip rate for the new tiers it was necessary to rely on comparative ratios. As an example, consider the $42,156 annual income category. First, it was determined that the average annual household VMT for this income level is 19,241 miles. This figure was then compared to the overall average annual VMT per household in the U.S. and normalized to the average of the $62,563 (24,053 miles) category to derive a ratio of 0.800. Next, the normalized ratio was applied to the daily VMT for the average single family housing unit size (Less than 1,500 sf) to generate a daily VMT of 41.36 for the new tier, as shown in Table B-5. This daily VMT figure was then divided by the proposed assessable trip length of 6.62 miles to obtain a typical trip rate of 6.25 trips per day. Table B-5 s ` Trip Generation Rate by Single,Family Land Use,Tier Estimation of Trip Rate by 1Assessable Tier Single Family (Detached) Trip Rate�ll 11 Trip Length(2) Daily VMT(3) Ratio to Mean(4) Less than 1,500 sf �'° �:�;�, 6.25 �� --; 6:62 41.36 -:'..0.800 1,500 to 2,499 sf ..'�-.7.81 �`_c'6.62 51.70 1.000 2,500 sf or larger `<> "-9.20, `-6:62 60.90 1.178 (1) Daily VMT (Item 3) divided by assessable trip length (Item'2) for each tiered single family land use category (2) Source. Table B-2 Ratio to the mean (Item 4)divided by,th'e total "daily VMT for the 1,500 to 2,499 sf tier for each'tiered,sf single family land use category (4) Source: Table B-4, (3) Table -,B26 illustrates the impact that the incorporation of the trip generation rate tiers for the single,family (detached) land use:have on the County's calculated impact fee schedule. Table B-6 :Net Impact Fee by Single Family Land Use Tier Impact of Tiering on Fee(1j j Schedule, Single Family (Detached) Assessable Trip Rate Length , Daily VMT Net Fee(2) Less than 1,500 sf 6.25 6.62 41.36 $3,491 1,500 to 2,499 sf 7.81 6.62 51.70 $4,354 2,500 sf or larger 9.20 6.62 60.90 $5,129 (1) Source: Table B-5, Item 1 (2) Source: Appendix E, Table E-1 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County B-3 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database The Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database includes over 200 studies on 40 different residential and non-residential land uses collected over the last 20 years. Data from these studies include trip generation, trip length, and percent new trips for each land use. This information has been used in the development of impact fees and the creation of land use plan category trip characteristics for communities throughout Florida and the U.S. TOA estimates trip generation rates for all land uses in a transportation impact fee schedule using data from studies in the Florida Studies Database. and the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (9th edition)NIn instances, when both ITE Trip Generation reference report (9th edition) and Florida,Studies trip generation rate (TGR) data are available for a particular land use, the data is typically blended together, to increase the sample size and provide a more valid estimate of the average number of trips,generated per unit of development. If no Florida Studies data is available, only TGR.data from the;ITE reference report is used in the fee calculation. The trip generation rate for each respective land use is calculated using machine counts that record daily traffic into and out of the site studied:. The traffic count.hoses are set at entrances to residential subdivisions for the residential°land uses and at all access points for non-residential land uses. The trip length information is,obtained'through origin -destination surveys that ask respondents where they came from -prior to arriving at -the'site and where they intended to go after leaving the site: "The results of`these surveys'were used to estimate average trip length by land use. • The percent,new1 trip variableis based, -on assigning each trip collected through the origin - destination surveyprocess a trip type (primary, secondary, diverted, and captured). The percent new trip variable is then calculated as 1 minus the percentage of trips that are captured. TOA has published an article :entitled, Measuring Travel Characteristics for Transportation Impact VY J Fees, ITE Journal, April 1991 -on the data collecting methodology for trip characteristics studies. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 B-4 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Mini -Warehouse (ITE LUC 151 Loosdon Site (1,000 sf) pate Total Size ITE Blended total 451.3 784.0 1,235.3 5 14 Average Trip Length: rt/a Weighted Average Trip Length: n/a Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Weight d Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: Single -Family Detached Housing (ITE LUC 210 1.53 2.50 2.15 loodon Size/Units Date Total R Interviews It Trip length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Orange Co, FL 107.0 - - - 1.45 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 89.6 - - - 1.2.3 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 84.7 - - - 1.39 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 93.0 - - - 1.51 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 77.0 - - - 2.18 - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 451.3 784.0 1,235.3 5 14 Average Trip Length: rt/a Weighted Average Trip Length: n/a Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Weight d Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: Single -Family Detached Housing (ITE LUC 210 1.53 2.50 2.15 loodon Size/Units Date Total It Interviews It Trip length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period `- Trip Length r "-Percent New - y' Trips VMT Source Gwinnett Co, GA - 12/13-18/92 - - 5.80 - :5.40 N/A 31.32 Street Smarts Gwinnett Co, GA - 12/13-18/92 - - 5.40 - : .6.10":". N/A 32.94 Street Smarts Sarasota Co, Fl 76 Jun -93 70 70 10.03 .. , 6.00+, - k N/A 60.18 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 79 Jun -93 86 86 9.77 '-4.40 - NN/A 42.99 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 135 Jun -93 75 75 8.05 _ 5.90 N/A 47.50 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 152 Jun -93 63 63 &55 il 7.30 :N/AN. 62.42 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, Ft 193 Jun -93 123 123 6.85' _ - 4.60 N/A. -. 31.51 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 97 Jun -93 33 33 13.20 ' i - 3.00 N/A-. r . 39.60 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 282 Jun -93 146 146 , 6.61 - 8.40 N/A ' '55.52 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, Ft. 393 Jun -93 207 207 7.76 \ - 5.40 N/A -.'4190 Sarasota County Hernando Co, Fl 76 May -96 148 148 10.01 I 9a -6p 4.85 N/A `.48.55\ Ti nd ale -Olive r & Associates Hernando Co, Fl 128 May -96 205 205 8.17',,':' 19a -6p 6.03`." N/A 49.27,•' Tindale -Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 232 May -96 182 182 7.24 -9a-6p 5.01.'. k N/A 36.49 .'. Tindale -Oliver &Associates Hernando Co, FL 301 May-% 264 264 8.93 ': 9a -6p •' 3.28 N/A 29.29 ' .Tindale-Olive r&Associates Charlotte Co, FL 135 Oct -97 230 5.30 '9a'5p,"... -.7.907' N/A 41.87 ._Tindale-Oliver&Associates Charlotte Co, FL 142 Oct -97 245 1 -'- 5.20 9a -5p ._ -. 4.10 N/A 21.32 'Tindale-Olive r&Associates Charlotte Co, FL 150 Oct -97 160 • -. - - 5.03 9a -5p'-'--',.'10.80 N/A 54.00 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Charlotte Co, FL 215 Oct -97 158 -: `-.7.60 9a -5p .. 4.60 N/A 34.96 Tindale-OI iver&Associates Charlotte Co, FL 257 Oct -97 225 -\ -,`7.60- 9a -5p :-7.40. `.. N/A 56.24 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 345 Oct -97 161 - • '7.00- 9a -Sp 6.60' N/A 46.20 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 368 Oct -97 152 -- 660,: 'i ' ';-9a-Sp 5.70' = . N. N/A 37.62 Tindale -Oliver &Assodate s Charlotte Co, FL 383 Oct -97 516 - _ 8.40 ' . 9a -5p. 5.00 .= `N/A 42.00 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Charlotte Co, Fl 441 Oct -97.- ...I% - t ' -\, 8.20 - 9a:5p - .` 4.70 -, N/A. 38.54 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 1,169 lOd-97 • .348, - . `, 6.10 =: 9a -5p.." : '8A0 'N/A' 48.80 Tindale -Oliver 8, Associates Collier Co, FL 90 Dec -99 91 ', - 12.80 •8a -6p - •,- 1L40-'..- N/A 145.92 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Collier Co, FL 400 Dec99 389 - V . 7.80 .' . 8a -6p "6.40' N/A 49.92 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates Lake Co, FL 49 1 ' Apr -02 170' Is,- •6.70 - -. ! 7a -6p 10.20 r., N/A 68.34 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 52 s 'Apr02 212 - 10.00 - 7a -6p 7.60 N/A 7600 Tin dale -OI iver&Assodates Lake Co, FL 126 `Apr -02 . 217 .. - 8.50 - -- 7a -6p 8.30 N/A 70.55 Tin date-Otiver&Associates Pasco Co, FL 55 Apr -02 . 133 .' _ - 6.80 .. 8a -6p 8.12 N/A 55.22 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Pasco Co, FL . -60 Apr -02 ' . 106 ' - 7.73 ' 8a -6p 8.75 N/A 67.64 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pasco Co, FL' 70 - Apr -02 , '188 ••- - - • 7.80 t . 8a -6p 6.03 N/A 47.03 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pasco Co, FL 74' ,'-Apr-02 ' 188 • -'-. 8.18 •..80-66 5.95 N/A 48.67 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Pasco Co, FL 189 Apr -02 '-.261 - -- 7.46'. \8a:6p 8.99 N/A 67.07 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Marion Co, FL' 102 . Apr -02 167 - '8.02 I., 7a -6p 5.10 N/A 40.90 IGmley-Horn&Associates Marlon Co, FL 105 _ Apr -02_'. _ 169 - _ - 7.23,- 7.23'- -- 7a -6p 7.22 N/A 52.20 IGmley-Horn&Associates Marlon Co, FL. 124 Apr -02 ' 170 s 6.04 70-6p 7.29 N/A 44.03 IGmley-Horn & Assodates Marion Co, FL 132 Apr -02' . - 171 , 7.87 7a -6p 7.00 N/A 55.09 10mley-Hom & Associates Marion Co, Fl - 133 Apr -02 ' 209 8.04 7a -6p 4.92 N/A 39.56 ICrmley-Horn&Associates Citrus Co, Fl ' 111 Oct -03 , '273 8.66 7a -6p 7.70 N/A 66.68 Tindale -Oliver &Associates atm Co, Fl - 231 Oct -03 . 155' - 5.71 7a -6p 4.82 N/A 27.52 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Citrus Co, FL , 306 Oct -03 1146'. - 8.40 70-6p 3.94 N/A 33.10 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Citrus Co, FL '364 1 Oct -03 345 . - 7.20 7a -6p 9.14 N/A 65.81 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Citrus Co, FL 374 . Oct -03 248 I. 12.30 70-66 6.88 N/A 84.62 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates Lake Co, FL 42 '. '-Dec-06 122 ! - 11.26 - 5.56 N/A 6261 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Lake Co, FL 51 Dec -C6 .'346 r - 18.22 - 9.46 N/A 172.36 Tindale -Oliver &Assod ates Lake Co, FL 59 : Dec -C6 144. - 12.07 - 10.79 N/A 13024 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Lake Co, FL 90 Dec -06 - . 1% - 9.12 - 5.78 N/A 52.71 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Lake Co, FL 239 Deo -06 -385 - 7.58 - 8.93 N/A 67.69 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 232 Apr -07 -, 516 - 8.02 7a -6p 8.16 N/A 65.44 Tindale -Oliver &Assodates Hernando Co, FL 95 Apr -07 256 - 8.08 7a -6p 5.88 N/A 47.51 Tindate-Oliver&Assodates Hernando Co, FL 90 Apr -07 338 - 7.13 7a -6p 5.86 N/A 41.78 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 58 Apr -07 153 - 6.16 7a -6p 8.39 N/A 51.68 Tindale -Oliver &Assodates Collier Co, FL 74 Mar -08 503 - _ 12.81 7a -6p 3.05 N/A 39.07 Tindale -Oliver &Assodate s Collier Co, FL 97 Mar -08 512 - 8.78 7a -6p 1L29 N/A 99.13 Tindale-Olive r&Associates Collier Co, Ft. 315 Mar -08 1,347 - 6.97 7a -6p 6.55 N/A 45.65 Tindale-Olive r&Associates Collier Co, FL 42 Mar -C4 314 - 9.55 7a -6p 10.98 N/A 10486 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Total Size 14380 55 Note: Georgia studies are not induded in summary statistirs. 1.3,130 Average Trip Length: 6.79 Weighted Average Trip Length: 6.62 Weighted Avenge Trip Generation Rate: 7.81 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County B-5 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Multi-Family/Apartment and Residential Condo/Townhouse (ITE LUC 220/230 Location Size/Units Date Total# Interviews #Trap Length Interviews Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New PercentGen Trips VMT Source Sarasota Co, FL 212 Jun -93 42 42 5.78 - 5.20 N/A 30.06 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 243 Jun -93 36 36 5,84 - - N/A - Sarasota County Marion Co, 11 214 Apr -02 175 175 6.84 - 4.61 N/A 31.53 Kimley-Horn&Associates Marion Co, FL 240 Apr -02 174 174 6.96 - 3.43 N/A 23.87 Kimley-Hon,&Assodates Marion Co, FL 288 Apr -02 175 175 5.66 - 5.55 N/A 31.41 IGmley-Horn&Assodates Marion Co, FL 480 Apr -02 175 175 5.73 - 6.88 N/A 39.42 IGmley-Ifom & Associates Marion Co, FL 500 Apr -02 170 170 5.46 - 5.94 N/A 32.43 Kimley-Horn & Associates Lake Co, FL 250 Dec -06 135 135 6.71 - 5.33 N/A 35.76 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 157 Dec -06 265 265 13,97 - 2.62 N/A 36.60 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 169 Dec -C6 212 - 8.09 - 6.00 N/A 48.54 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 226 Dec -06 301 - 6.74 - 2.17 N/A 14.63 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 312 Apr -07 456 - 4.09 - 5.95 N/A 24.34 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 176 Apr -07 332 - 5.38 - 5.24 N/A 28.19 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates Hernando Co, FL 31 May -96 31 31 6.12 9a -6p 4.98 N/A 30.48 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 128 May -96 128 128 6.47 9a -6p 5.18 N/A 33.51 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Pasco Co, FL 229 Apr -02 198 198 4.77 9a -6p- N/A - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pasco Co, FL 248 Apr -02 353 353 4.24 9a -6p 3.53 N/A 14.97 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Total Size Total Size (TL) 4,103 3,631 Total Size 3,467 1.3 ITE 39,480 88 Blended total 21,947 L-LUC 230 Studies are highlighted Total Size 636 ITE 30.024 Blended total 10660 4 56 Average Trip Length: Weighted Average Trip length: 4.84 5.10 WC sn] .MoIti-Family Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.31 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.65 Blend of FL Studies and FTE Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.60 LJ Ilr 730- Cendo/TownhonseJ Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 4.97 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.81 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: 5.76 Mobile Home Park (ITE LUC 240 Location Size/Units Date Total# InteMews #Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate .: Time Period - Trip Length Percent New Trips VTAT ♦ -) Source Marion Co, FL 67 1u1-91 726 22 22'-?� 5.40 3.28 48hrs. .-' 2.29 N/A 12.37 Tindale-Olive r&Associates Marion Co, FL 82 Jul -91 - 58 58.= -._1680 - 24hr. "' 3.72 N/A 4018 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Marion Co, FL 137 Jul -91 22 22. -. 3.10 24hr. ' 4.88: N/A 15.13 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Marion Co, FL 188 Apr -02 147 - ^. 3.51 '- 245r. 5.48 N/A 19.23 Kimley-Hom&Associates Marion Co, FL 227 Apr -02 173 - - . 2.76 ' -. 241r. 8.80 N/A 24.29 Kimley-Hom & Assodates Sarasota Co, FL 235 Jun -93 110 100: 3.51 ' ' 5.10 '. _'.N/A 17.90 Sarasota County Marion Co, FL 297 Apr -02 --- - . 175 - . t 4.78 24hr. 4.76 ' . - N/A 22.75 Kimley-Horn & Assodates Sarasota Co, FL 996 lin-93 . - - ''- 181 181 . 4.19 - -t 4.40 ' . N/A . 18.44 Sarasota County Hernando Co, FL 1,892 May-%'_. .'- 425' , 425 4.13 - 'N/A 17.06 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Total Size 4,121 9 1,303 Average Trip Length: 4.84 Weighted Average Trip Length: 4.60 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: Senior Adult Housing - Attached (ITE LUC 252 4.17 Locations Size/Unfti Date >,InteTobl#•#ngd•. -Mews' Intervi41.4.1.46;141.4.1.46;1_ ws Trip Gen Hate, Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Sun City Center, FL 208 Oct -91 726 726 2.46 '� 24hr. 3.28 - 8.07 lin dal e-Oliver&Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 208 438 Average Trip Length: 378 Weighted Average Trip Length: 378 11 Weighted Average Trip Generation Nate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: Congregate Care Facil ry ( ITE LUC 253 2.46 3.44 2.97 Location Size /Uti is Date Totalft Interviews #Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VW Source Pinellas Park, FL 72 Aug -89 ? 25 . / 19 3.50 9am-5pm 2.20 79.0 7.70 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Palm Harbor, FL 200 .'0c1-89 .' '58 ', 40 - 9arn-Spm 3.40 69.0 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 272 660 460 2 2 83 Average Trip Length: 2.80 Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.08 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 71.6 Weight d Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FLStudles and FTE Average Trip Generation Rate: 3.50 2.02 2.25 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 B-6 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Hotel (ITE LUC 310 Location Size (Rooms) pate Total Interviews aTrip length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Sour,, Pinellas Co, FL 174 Aug -89 134 106 12.50 7 -11a/3 -7p 6.30 79.0 62.21 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 114 Oct -89 30 14 7.30 12-7p 6.20 47.0 2127 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates Orange Co, FL 70 - 26 - 185 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 211 - - - 2.23 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 112 - - - 2.78 - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 1,495 - - - 3.50 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 123 - - - 3.70 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 130 - - - 4.29 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 1,499 - - - 4.69 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 190 - - - 4.71 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 123 - - - 4.81 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 105 - - - 5.25 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 120 - - - 5.27 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 1,584 - - - 5.88 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 128 - - - 6.10 - - - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 174 - - - 7.03 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 144 - - - 7.32 - . - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 98 - - - 7.32 - e - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 106 - - - 7.34 - J - . - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 100 - - - 7.37 - ! - - , - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 144 - - - 7.66 - . - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 6,944 4.760 11,702 21 10 164 Average Trip Length: 6.25 Weighted Average Trip Length: 6.26 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 66.3 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FLStudies and 1TE Average Trip Generation Rate: Motel (ITE LUC 320) 5.12 817 6.36 Location Size (Rooms) Date Totals Interviews aTrip Length'- ,, Interviews, Trip Gen Rate Tlme Period Trip Length ) Percent New Trips VMT . Source , Pinellas Co, FL 48 Oct -89 46 =. 24 - 10a -2p 2.80 65.0 - `'.Tindale-Oliver&Associates Pinellas Co, FL 54 Oct -89 32 _ 22 . - 12p -7p . - 3.80 69.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 120 Oct -89 26 .22-. -. - 2p -7p ' - 5.20 84.6 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Total Size ITE 222 2,160 3 10 104 Average Trip Length: 3.93 Weighted Avenge Trip Length: 4.34 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 76.6 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Movie Theater with Matinee (ITE LUC 444) 5.63 Location Size(Saeens) Date Totala Interviews aTrip Length `. Interviews ` Trip Gen Rate ,• `-percent Time Period - Trip Length New Trips VMT Source Pinellas Co, FL8 .. - OR -89 151 -_ -' 116 113.10 2p -8p 2.70 77.0 235.13 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 12 Sep -89`. 122 ' 116 63.40 2p -8p 190 95.0 114.44 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Total Size ITE 20 L estimated 30 273 Average Trip Length: 2.30 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.22 Weighted Percent New Trip Avenge: 87.8 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate (6th): Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: Health Club (ITE LUC 492 83.28 153.33 106.63 Location Size (1,000 el Date Total Inteews M aTdp Length, InteMews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL .. - Mar -86 33 l 31 -'� - - 7.90 94.0 - Kimley-Hom & Associates Total Size ITE 15 33 Avera a Trip Length: n/a Percent New Trip Average: 94.0 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Da v Care Center (ITE LUC 565 32.93 Location Size (1,000 sf) Dated _. - Totals . Interviews aTdp length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Portent New Trips VMT Source Pinellas Co FL 5.6 Aug -89 94 66 66,99 7a -6p L90 700 89.10 Tindal e -Olive r & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 100 Sep -89 179 134 66.99 7a -6p 2.10 75.0 106,51 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 28 25 - - 2.60 89.0 - Kimley-Horn & Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 15.6 35.0 506 2 7 301 Average Trip Length: 20 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.03 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 73.2 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and HTE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: 6699 74.06 71.88 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County B-7 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Nursing Home (ITE LUC 620 Location Site (Beds) Date Totala Interviews It Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip length Percent New Trips VMT Source Lakeland, FL 120 Mar -90 74 66 2.86 11a -4p 2.59 89.0 659 Tindale-Olive r&Assodates Total Site ITE Blended total 120 214 834 6 74 Average Trip Length: 159 Weighted Avenge Trip Length: 159 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 89.0 Weight d Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Clinic (ITE LUC 630 186 174 176 Location Site (1,000 sf) Date Total s Interviews II Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Largo, FL 103.9 Aug -89 614 572 37.03 7a -430p 5.10 93.0 175.63 Tindale -Oliver & Associates 5t. Petersburg, FL - Oct -89 280 252 - 9a -5p 4.10 - 90.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Total Size ITE 103.9 224.0 327.9 2 894 Avenge Trip Length: 4.60 Weighted Avenge Trip length: 5.10 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 93.0 Weight d Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: General Office Building (ITE LUC 710 37.03 31.45 3122 Location Site (1,000 sf) Date Total Interviews It Trip Length Interviews / Trip Gen Rate - Time period Trip Length Percent New , - Trips _ VMT Source Sarasota Co, FL 14.3 Jun -93 14 14 ,4&5 8. - 11.30 - - {'529.41 Sarasota County Gwinnett Co, GA 98.0 Dec -92 - - '4.30 l - 5.40 - - - Street Smarts Gwinnett Co, GA 180.0 Dec -92 - - 3.60 - 5.90 - ti -'-.'l Street Smarts Pinellas Co, FL 187.0 Oct -89 431 388 18.49 '. '..7a -Sp 6.30"'- 900 104.84'--' Tindale-Oliver&Assodates 5t. Petersburg, FL 2628 Sep -89 291 274 - + 7a -5p 3.40` 94.0 -.lo, -'.Tindale-Oliver &Associates Total Site 742.1 5 736 Avera a Trip length: 6.46 ITE 15,522.0 78 Weighted Avenge Trip Length: 5.15 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 92.3 Medical -Dental Office Building (ITE LUC 720): 10,000 sf or Less Site Size (1,000 sf) - Tues., Jan 11 Wedn., Jan 12 Thur., Jan 13 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE (per 1,000 sf) , - IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT TOTAL Site 1 2.100 35 35 22 22 13 13 70 70 23.33 23.33 11.11 11.11 22.22 Site 2 3.000 40 40 52 52 53 53 145 145 48.33 48.33 16.11 16.11 32.22 Site 3 2.000 28 28 19 21 24 26 71 75 23.67 25.00 11.84 12.50 2434 Site 4 1.000 30 30 52 52 57 57 139 139 46.33 46.33 46.33 46.33 92.66 Site 5 3.024 _ 31 32 43 43 24 24 98 99 32.67 33.00 10.80 10.91 21.71 Site 6 1.860 22 24 19 17 11 11 52 52 17.33 17.33 932 9.32 18.64 Average 17.59 17.71 35.30 Average (exduding Site 4) 11.84 11.99 23.83 Medical -Dental Office Building (ITE LUC 720 Location < _ - 'Site (1,000 sf) Date Total s \Interviews p7rip Length • Interviews- Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL - . •- Mar -86 \.33 ', 26 \ - ' - 600 79.0 - Nunley -tom & Associates Palm Harbor, FL \ 14.6' Oct -89 107 76 33.98 9a -5p 6.30 73.0 156.27 Tindale-0liver&Associates 5t. Petersburg, Fl '-' Nov -89 34 1 30 57.20 9a -4p 1.20 88.0 - Ti nd ale -Olive r & Associates Hernando Co, Fl 58.4 ' '. May -96 390 -I 349 28.52 9a -6p 6.47 89.5 165.09 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Hernando Co, FL 28.0'+-• 'May -96 202 1 189 49.75 92-6p 6.06 93.8 282.64 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Charlotte Co, FL 11.0 ' ' Oct -97 _ 186 49.50 9a -Sp 4.60 92.1 209.67 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Charlotte Co, FL 28.0 ', Oct -97. .. = 1 186 31.00 9a -5p 3.60 81.6 91.04 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Charlotte Co, FL 30.4 Oct -97`' - -• 324 39.80 9a -5p 3.30 83.5 109.68 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Citrus Co, FL 3&9 OR -03.. - 168 32.26 8-6p 6.80 97.1 213.03 Ti nd ale -Olive r & Associates Citrus Co, FL 100 Nov -03, - 340 40.56 8-630p 6.20 914 23133 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Citrus Co, FL 5.3 Dec -03 - 20 29.36 8.5p 5.25 95.2 14678 Tindale-Olive r&Associates Orange Co, FL 50.6 - - - 26.72 - - - - Orange County Orange Co FL 23.5 - - - 16.58 - - - - Orange County Total Site ITE Blended total 298.6 450.0 748.6 11 10 763 Average Trip Length: 5.07 Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.55 Weighted Percent New Trip Avenge: 8&9 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: 3159 36.13 34.72 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County B-8 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Business Park (ITE LUC 770 Location Size (1,C00 sf) Date TotalR Interviews aTrip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length percent New Trips VMT Source Collier Co, FL 14.1 May -99 - 55 33.48 83-6p 3.60 72.7 87.62 Tindal e -Oliver & As sod ate s Collier Co, FL 66.0 May -99 - 43 1153 Ba -6p 5.70 79.0 5192 Tindale -Oliver & As sod ate s Collier Co, FL 211.1 May -99 - 284 17.91 8a -6p 5.40 93.0 89.94 Tindale-Olive r&Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 291.2 62880 6579.2 3 16 Average Trip Length: 4.90 Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.38 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 88.8 Weight d Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Shopping Center (ITE LUC 820 17.22 11.44 1/65 Location Size 0000 s1) Date Tatalp Interviews aTrip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 527 348 - - - - - , 660 - Kimley-Horn&Assodates Tampa, FL Mar -86 170 - - 170 . '/ - - Kimley-Foca & Assodates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 354 269 - - - . 76.0 - Kimley-Hom & Assodates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 144 - - - '.'2.50'? - - Kimley-Roca&Assodates 51. Petersburg, FL 1,192.0 Aug -89 384 298 - 11a -7p-''' 3.60 78.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates 5t. Petersburg, FL 132.3 Sep -89 400 368 77.00 10a -7p -" 180 92.0 127.51 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Largo, FL 425.0 Aug -89 160 120 26.73 10a -6p - 2.30 ', `75.0 46,11 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Dunedin, FL 80.5 Sep -89 276 210 8148 '9a -5i ' 140 76.0 86.69 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pinellas Park, FL 696.0 Sep -89 485 388 - - ., 9a:6p 3.20 `,80.0" - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Seminole, FL 425.0 011.89 674 586 -7 87.0, .."! - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Hillsborough Co, FL 134.0 Jul -91 - - .- �7 1.30 74.0 ,1 - - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Hillsborough Co, FL 1510 Jul -91 1, 1,-- 7' - 1.30 73.0 `i\- Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 68 64 - 3.33 94.1 -- -'-. Tindale -Oliver &Associates Collier Co, Fl - Aug -91 208 154, - , - 2,64; - 74.0 -c- ", Tindale -Oliver & Assad ate s Sarasota/Bradenton, FL 109.0 Sep -92 300 185 - ,...1124-6p ,- 61.6--.1,.. 'King Engineering Associates, Inc Ocala, FL 133.4 Sep -92 300 192 - .. 12a -6p - - --- • 64.0 - - . King Engineering Associates, Inc Gwinnett Co, GA 99.1 Dec -92 - .. 46.00 .. :-3.203: 70.0 103.04 '/ Street Smarts Gwinnett Co, GA 314.7 Dec -92 - - ", 27.00 - '. - 8.50 84.0 192.78 - Street Smarts Sarasota Co, FL 110.0 Jun -93 58 58. '- ti. 122.14 - _' 3.20 - - Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 146.1 Jun -93 65 ` - 65 ''\ ._ 51.53 - •- /80. - - Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 157.5 tun -93 57 57 + 79,79 `., - ''3,40 '- - - Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 1910 Jun -93 62 62 66,79 .. - 5.90 - - - Sarasota County Hem ando Co, FL 107.8 May -96 608 331' 77.60. 9a -6p 4,68, -54,5 197.85 Tindal e -Olive r & Assodates Charlotte Co, FL 88.0 Oct -97 -- - - 1. 73.50 `..9a -5p - 180 • 57.1 75.56 Tindale-Oliver&Assod ate s Charlotte Co, FL 191.9 ; Oct -97 `, - - - _',72.00 '9a -5p ,--.2.40 ' 50.9/ 87.97 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Charlotte Co, FL 51.3 ' Oct -97,-"-' _''43.00 . 9a -5p ` :--2.704 51.8 60.08 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 67.8 - Apr -01 246 177 r, 10/60/' - '3.40 ' -' 712 248.37 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 72.3 Apr -01 4443 376 65,30- - 4,50'-.' r 59.0 173,37 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Pasco Co, FL 65.6 - Api-02 222 ', •-' - 145,64'•+ 9a -Sp 146 46.9 99,62 Tindal e -Olive r & Assodates Pasco Co, Fl 75.8 Apr -02 - 134 , - - 38,23 9a -5p 2.36 58.2 52.52 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Citrus Co, Fl 1135.0 Oct -03 - ` " 784 55.84 •, 8a -6p 2.40 88.1 118.05 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Citrus Co, FL -.--913 Nov -03- 390"' . 54,50 '. '8a -6p L60 860 76,77 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Bozeman, MF 104.37` Dec -06 ' - 359 """'359 46.% - 3,35 49,0 77.08 Tindal e -Oliver & Assod ate s Bozeman, MF • - -- 159,9 - -Dec-06 3, 502-, 502 ..'56,49 156 54.0 47,59 Tindal e -Olive r & Assod ate s Bozeman, MF - 35.9 ' Dec -06 '329- `• 329 ".-69.30 *a �" - 1.39 74.0 71.28 Tindal e -Olive r & Assod ate s Total Size 5,757.5 7,536 . Avenge Trip Length: n/a Weighted Average Trip Length: n/a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County B-9 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study 4.00 3.50 3.00 N 2.50 m 2.00 a 1.50 1.00 Figure B-1 Shopping Center (LUC 820) — Florida Curve Trip Length Regression O O 0.50 0.009 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Square Footage Source: Regression analysis based on FL:Studies data for LUC -8'20-- , a 1- z c 90% .t, 'Figure ° 13-2 Shopping Center`(LUC 820) — Florida Curve Percent New;Trips Regression 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ••••♦♦•♦ 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Square Footage Source Regression analysis based on FL Studies data for LUC 820 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 B-10 Impact Fee Update Study a Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study New Car Sales (ITE LUC 841 Location Site (1,000 sf) pate Total Interviews pTriO Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip length Percent New Trips VMT Source St.Petersburg, FL 43.0 Oct -89 152 120 - 9a -5p 4.70 79.0 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Clearwater, FL 43.0 Oct -89 136 106 29.40 9a -5p 4.50 78.0 103.19 Ind ale-Oliver&Associates Orange Co, FL 116.7 - - - 22.18 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 99.8 - - - 13.45 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 39.1 - - - 10.48 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 66.3 - - - 28.50 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 46.7 - - - 40.34 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 34.4 - - - 23.45 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 13.8 - - - 35.75 - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 459.7 570.0 1,029.7 8 15 288 Average Trip Length: 4.60 Weighted Average Trip Length: 4.60 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 78.5 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Supermarket (ITE LUC 850 23.22 32.30 28.25 Lav Size (1,000:() Date Total # Interviews #Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate c Time Period r -:> `ation TAp length f Portent New . Trips VMT Source Palm Harbor, FL 62.0 Aug -89 163 62 10626 9.144 " - 2.08 - '56.8 123.77 Tindal e-Oliver&Assodate s Total Size ITE Blended total 62.0 1 163 . Avera eTrip Length: LOB 156.0 4 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.08 218.0 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 56.0 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation fate: Blend of Fl Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Service Station w/Convenience Market (ITE LUC 853 106.26 102.24 103.38 Lootion 974 (1.000 sf) Date Total# Interviews pTdp Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate - Time period _ '- - Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source ' _i Tampa, FL - Mar -86 72 » ' - - - . 2.00 - Tindale-Oliver&Assodate s - Kimley-Horn & Assodates Marion Co, FL 1.1 Jun -91 77 . 20',, "544.80 24hr. .- 0.89 26.0 126.07 Tin dale -Olive r & Assod ate s Marion Co, FL 2.1 Jun -91 66 ' 24 . 997.60- 2411r. 1.67 �. 36.4 60642 Tin dale -Olive r&Associates Marion Co, FL 4.4 Jun -91 85 25 t '486.70 T . 48hrs. 1.06 29.4 151.68 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 96 38 .> -- . - .- L19'. `..39.6 - Tindal e -Olive r & Assod ate s Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 78 16 .. - - _ 1.06 • . 20.5 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Tampa, FL 2.3 10/13-1.5/92 - 239 74 ' t - `24hr. - 1.06 . 31.1. - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Ellenton, FL 3.3 10/20-22/92 124 44 - - 124hr.; - s 0.96 35.3 1 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Tampa, FL 3.8 '11/1612/92- -- 142 23 ' -, 24hr.'7" '3.13', 164 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Marion Co, Fl 2.5 Apr -02 87 - , 719.79 . " 24lir. -‘1372 32.8 322.19 Kimley-Hom & Assodates Marion Co, FL 2.5 -. Apr -02 23 - 610.46 1 • 24hr. 1.77 - 11.7 126.61 Kimley-tom & Assodates Marion Co, FL 3.0 Apr -02 59 - 60602 . ` 24hr. 0.83 32.6 195.00 Kimley-tom & Assodates Total Size ITE Blended Total 25.1 ag 55.1 45.6 9 10 15.6 1,148 Average Trip Length: 1.44 Weighted Average Trip Length: 1.51 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 27.7 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Furniture Store (ITE LUC 890 639.68 845.60 775.14 Lootion`::-. ' Site (1,000 sf) Date Totala Interviews pTrip length Interviews‘_ Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent NewVMT Trips Source Largo, Fl \ ...15.0 7/28-30/92 ` 641 34'. t - - 4.63 52.5 - Tindale-Oliver&Assodate s Tampa, FL 'v., '1.16.9 Jul -92 V68 . 39 '.. - - 7.38 55.7 - Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Total Size ITE 31.9 897.0 2 13 132 Average Trip Length: 601 - Weighted Average Trip Length: 609 Weighted Percent New TAp Average: 54.2 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.06 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County B-11 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Drive -In Bank (ITE LUC 912 Luotion Size (1,030 sf) Date Total R Interviews it Trip length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 77 - - - 2.40 - - Kimley-Horn&Associates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 211 - - - - 54.0 - Kimley-Horn&Assodates Clearwater, FL 0.4 Aug -89 113 52 - 9a -6p 5.20 46.0 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Largo, FL 2.0 Sep -89 129 94 - - 160 73.0 - Tindal e -Olive r & Assod ate s Seminole, FL 4.5 Oct -89 - - - - - - - Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Marion Co, FL 2.3 Jun -91 69 29 - 24hr. L33 42.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Marion Co, FL 3.1 Jun -91 47 32 - 24hr. 175 68.1 - Tindale-Oliver&Assodate s Marion Co, FL 2.5 1u1-91 57 26 - 48hrs. 2.70 45.6 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 162 96 - 24hr. 0.88 59.3 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 116 54 - - 158 46.6 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 142 68 - - 2.08 47.9 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Hernando Co, FL 5.4 May -96 164 41 - 9a -6p 2.77 247 - Tindale-Oliver&Assodate s Marion Co, FL 2.4 Apr -02 70 - - 241w. 3.55 54.6 - Kimley-Horn & Assodates Marion Co, FL 2.7 May -02 50 - 246.66 24hr. 2.66 40.5 265.44 IGmley-Horn&Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 25.2 210 46.2 23.7 9 7 1407 Average Trip Length: 2.38 Weighted Average Trip length: 2.46 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 46.2 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Restaurant (ITE LUC 932 246.66 14815 159.34 Location Size (1,000 sij Date Total 11 Interviews OTrip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time 'Period Trip Length Percent New. -• 's Trips, . VMT Source Hernando Co, FL 6.2 May -96 242 - ` 175 187.51. - 9a -6p 2.76 72.5 , ' 375.00 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Hernando Co, FL 8.2 May -96 154 - 93 102.71 '. 9a -6p 4.15 60.2 . 256.43 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates St. Petersburg, Fl 5.0 Oct -89 74 lla-2p 68 132.60 . 1130-7p 2.00 92.0 '243.98`+ Tindale -Oliver &Associates Kenneth Oty, FL 5.2 Oct -89 236 2.30 176 127.88". . 4p -730p 2.30.: - 75.0 220.59 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Pasco Co, FL 5.2 Apr -02 1.14 49.0 88 82.47 " . 9a -6p 3.72 ' . i 77.2 23681 ' ' Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Pasco Co, FL 5.8 Apr -02 182 466.64 102 116.97 - 9a -6p- 1.3.49' 56.0 22877 \ .Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Orange Co, FL 8.9 - - .- - 52.69 - - - - \ 1 Orange County Orange Co, FL 11.3 - - Collier Co, FL - - 62.1.2 - _ - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 6.7 - - t . '. 82.58 - •- - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 114 - - May -96 _ •. - 9167O 547.34 9a -6p 159 - range Orange County Orange Co, FL 113 - - 376 . - '1 . 95.33-. - .- - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 7.2 - - 182 - 98.06 - 47.8 - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 5.5 - - 353.70 - 10018 - - +. . - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 9.7 - - 9a -6p - . 105.84 -_ , - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 4.6 .. ._ 2.72 - 129.23 - - . 4.42 - Orange County Orange Co, FL 7.0 -- - • .. 714 - 126.40 Orange Co, FL -. t =r - Orange County Orange Co, FL 9.7 r' = - - - .132.32 - , .- . - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 5.0 - -'� 135.68 - - - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 5.6 r • - - . - .- - 145.59 - - - r - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 7.4 _ A - - 147.44 . . ' - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 5.9 - .. - - 147.74. - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 152.8 064 250.8 21 1,102 14 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 70.8 Weighte Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive Thru (ITE LUC 934) 10984 127.15 116.60 Location 'Size(1,0008” Date - Total Interviews RTrip Length.. Interviews Trip Gen Rate ) Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL Mar -86 :61 \ - ` - - 2.70 - - Kimley-Horn & Assodates Tampa, FL .. Mar -86 306- -R - - - - 65.0 - Kimley-Horn & Assodates Pinellas Co, FL 2.20 .. - Aug -89 81 r; 'i 48 502.80 lla-2p 170 59.0 503.31 Tindal e-Oliver&Assodates Pinellas Co, FL 4.30,' -'Oct-89 456'-i 260 660.40 1day 2.30 57.0 865.78 Tindal e-Oliver&Assodates Tarpon Spnngs, FL - s ' Oct -89 .233':: 114 - 7a -7p 3.60 49.0 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Marion Co, FL L60 .'Jun -91 : 32 962.50 48hrs. 0.91 53.3 466.64 Tind al e -Olive r & Assod ate s Marion Co, FL 4.00 "Jon=91 -'1753 46 625.00 48hrs. 154 613 590.01 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Collier Co FL - Aug -91 . 66 44 - - 191 66.7 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 '. '"118 40 - - 117 33.9 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Hernando Co, FL 5.43 May -96 136 82 31183 9a -6p 168 60.2 315.27 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Hernando Co, Fl 3.13 May -96 168 82 547.34 9a -6p 159 48.8 425.04 Tindale-Olive r&Associates Lake Co, FL 2.20 Apr -01 376 252 934.30 - 2.50 74.6 1742.47 Tindale -Oliver & As sod ate s lake Co, FL 3.20 Apr -01 171 182 654.90 - 4.10 47.8 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Lake Co, FL 3.80 Apr -01 188 137 353.70 - 3.30 70.8 826.38 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Pasco Co, FL 2.66 Apr -02 100 46 283.12 9a -6p 5.10 460 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pasco Co, FL 2.96 Apr -02 486 164 515.32 90-66, 2.72 33.7 472.92 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Pasco Co, FL 4.42 Apr -02 168 120 759.24 9a -6p 189 714 1024.99 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Orange Co, FL 8.93 - - - 377.00 - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 488 13 4,463 Average Trip Length: 2.42 114 21 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.05 1118 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 57.9 34.0 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITT Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 530.19 496.12 511.00 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County 13-12 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Automobile Care Center (ITE LUC 942 Lootion Size (1,000 sf) Date Totala Interviews 0Trip Length Interviews Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New TripsVMT VMT Source ladcsonville, FL 2.3 2/3-4/90 124 94 - 9a -Sp 3.07 76.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates ladcsonville, Fl 2.3 2/3-4/90 110 74 - 9a -5p 2.96 67.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Jacksonville, Fl 2.4 2)3-4/90 132 87 - 9a -5p 2.32 66.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Lakeland, FL 5.2 Mar -90 24 14 - 9a -4p 136 59.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Largo, FL 5.5 Sep -89 34 30 37.64 9a -5p 2.40 88.0 79.50 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Orange Co, FL 25.0 Nov -92 41 39 - 2-6p 4.60 - - LCE, Inc Lakeland, FL - Mar -90 54 42 - 9a -4p 2.44 78.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 42.6 102.0 144.6 107.5 66 519 Average Trip Length: L74 Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.62 Weighted Percent New Trip Avenge: 72.2 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Trip Generation Rate: Service Station with and w/o Car Wash (ITE LUC 944 & 946 37.64 3110 31.43 Lootion Size (1,000 sf) Date Total Size ITE LUC 944 (vfp) ITE LUC 946 (vfp) 0.6 1 238 Average Trip Length: 1.46 48.0 6 Weighted Average Trip Length: 1.90 120.0 10 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 23.0 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position (LUC 944): ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position (LUC 946): Blended ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position: Self -Service Car Wash (ITE LUC 947 168.56 152.84 157.33 Lootion Size(Bays) Date Total II Interviews It Trip length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Largo, FL 0.6 Nov -89 70 14 - Dam -Spm 1.90 23.0 - llndale-Oliver & Associates Collier County, Fl - Aug -91 168 40 - - 1.01 23.8 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Total Size ITE LUC 944 (vfp) ITE LUC 946 (vfp) 0.6 1 238 Average Trip Length: 1.46 48.0 6 Weighted Average Trip Length: 1.90 120.0 10 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 23.0 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position (LUC 944): ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position (LUC 946): Blended ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position: Self -Service Car Wash (ITE LUC 947 168.56 152.84 157.33 Lootion Size(Bays) Date TotalR Interviews 4Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate- Tlme Period Trip length - - ♦Percent New 7 Trips VW. - Source largo, FL 10 Nov -89 111 ' 'x.84 - 8ain-Spm••. .00: 76.0 - -, Tinde-Oliver&Associates Clearwater, FL - Nov -89 177 708--. - 1Dam-Spm.- '130 61.0 - 'Tindale-Oliver&Associates Collier, FL 11 Dec -09 304 - . 30.24 - 250 57.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Collier, FL8 lora-09 186 ` =4 - '-22.75 - .- ' (96 72.0 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Total Size Total Size (TGR) ITE Blended total 29 19 5 24 3 2 1 778 Average Trip length: 1.94 Weighted Average Trip Length: 218 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 67.7 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 27.09 10&00 43.94 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County B-13 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Appendix C ransportationimPact Fee /Cost Component Calculations \ , - Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the cost component of the transportation impact fee update. Backup data and assumptions are provided for all cost variables (for county and state roads), including: • Design • Right -of -Way • Construction • Construction Engineering/Inspection • Roadway Capacity Urban Design vs. Rural Design A r ' ,,a Due to a lack of roadway construction data for rural -design roadways, for these types of roads was calculated, using an adjustment factor. on the rural -to -urban design cost ratio from the -most recent�D,istrict 7 (LRE) provided by FDOT. Based on the=, LRE, 'the cost for rural -des expansion (new road^construction or lane addition), is'approximately of urban -design roadway improvements. For all subsequent tables roadways), costs are presented ,for urban -design roadways, with the costs being=calculated using the -cost ratio, -from Table C-1. Table -C-1 ' 4 -Urban% Rural Design Cost Factor the cost,per lane mile This factor was based Long Range Estimates ign roadway capacity 83 percent of the cost (for county and state rural -design roadway Improvement 0-2 Lanes _; Cost -- _ — per Lane Mile Rural Design 1 Urban Design Ratio $2,392,343 $3,383,918 71% '=0-4'Lanes;# $1,918,228 $2,382,206 81% O26•Lanes $1,626,803 $1,944,969 84% 2-4 Lanes $2,897,987 $3,439,476 84% 4-6 Lanes $3,229,018 $3,833,955 84% 4-8 Lanes $2,145,375 $2,532,536 85% 6-8 Lanes $4,061,468 $4,569,033 89% Average $2,610,175 $3,155,156 83% Source: FDOT District 7 Long Range Estimates, 2013 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 C-1 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Design County Roadways The design cost factor for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the design -to - construction cost ratios for county road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For county roadways, the design factors ranged from 6 percent to 14 percent, with a weighted average of 10 percent. For/purposes of this update study, the design cost for county roads was calculated at 10 percent of the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-10 for additional information)_:. Table" -C-2/' Design Cost Adjustment — County Roads` Road Type Design Cost per Lane Mile(1) Section Design Distribution' Weighted Design Cost per, Lane Mile Urban Design $180,000 ' , 34% $61,000 Rural Design $149,000 _ ,. `66% $98,000 Weighted Average Design Cost per Lane Mile $159,000 (1) Design cost is estimated at 10%'of_construction`cbst-based on recent TIF studies in Table C=10 (Itm a) •`, f' (2) Source: -,Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. i' \ - State'Roadways The design cost factor for state roads :was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane rnile. This factor was determined through a review of the design -to - construction cost:ratios for state road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida.`',For, state roadways, the design factors ranged from 10 percent to 14 percent, with a weighted average of 11 percent. For purposes of this update study, the design cost for state roads was calculated at 11 percent of the construction cost per lane mile. See Table C-10 for additional information. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 C-2 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-3 Design Cost Adjustment — State Roads KWeighted Design Cost per i Road Type Lane Mile(1) Section Design Distribution(,2) . Design Cost per, Mile(3) Lane Mile - .. Urban Design $220,000 34% $75,000 Rural Design $183,000 66% $121,000 Weighted Average Design Cost per Lane Mile $196,000 (1) Design cost is estimated at 11% of construction cost based.on recent TIF studies in Table C-10 (Item b) • (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) f (3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied.by the 'associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together.` Right -of -Way The ROW cost reflects the total co'st:of the acquisitions along a corridor that was necessary to have sufficient cross-section width.,,to'-widen an` existing road or, in the case of new construction, build a new road. County Roadways v To determine a ROW,acquisitibr :cost per -lane mile for county roads, TOA conducted a review of recently completed ROW acquisitions and current ROW estimates along capacity f expansion projects in India riAliver'County.and •alo reviewed ROW estimates from recent transportation impact fee studies from other counties in Florida. For impact fee purposes, the ROW cost for county roads was -'estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. , This factor was\determin'ed'through a review of the ROW -to -construction cost • ratios for county: road unit costs from recent local projects and in previously completed impact fee studies throughout-FIorida. For county roadways in Indian River County, the ROW factors ranged'frorn 6 -percent to 150 percent, with a weighted average of 41 percent, as shown in Table C-11. ':ThiS'factor is consistent with the ratio of ROW to construction cost observed in other Florida jurisdictions, as shown in Table C-12. For purposes of this update study, the ROW cost for county roads was calculated at 41 percent of the construction cost per lane mile. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 C-3 Impact Fee Update Study s • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-4 Right -of -Way Cost Adjustment — Count Roads Road Type Urban Design ROW Cost per ; - ! Lane Mile i $738,000 Section Design Distributional Weighted ROW.' Cost per Cane,; Mile (3) 34% $251,000 Rural Design $613,000 66% $405,000 Weighted Average ROW Cost per Lane Mile $656,000 (1) ROW cost is estimated at 41% of construction cost, based on recent IRC improvements in Table C-11 (Item 2) (2) Source. Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) ROW cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the as ociated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together::.= State Roadways Due to a lack of local acquisition data, theROW cost for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile: This: -factor was determined through a review of the ROW -to -construction ,cost ratios 'forttate road unit costs ..in previously completed impact fee studies throughouttFlorida. For: state roadways, the ROW factors ranged from 20 percent to 71 percent, 'with' -.a weighted. average of 44 percent. For purposes of this update -study, the " "":cost 44 percent of the construction cost-Iper lane mile (see Table C-12-.fo"rradditionaI information). Table C-5 Right=Of-Way_Co`st-Adjustment — State Roads Road Type ROW Cost per ; Lane Mile(1) Section Design Distribution(2) Weighted.ROW' �.. Cost per Lanei Urban Design $880,000 34% $299,000 Rural Design $730,000 66% $482,000 Weighted Average ROW Cost per Lane Mile $781,000 (1) ROW cost'iszestirriated'at 44% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in Table C-12"(Item b):1. (2) Source. Appe6dix''C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) ROW cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 C-4 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Construction County Roadways A review of construction cost data for recent local county roadway capacity expansion projects identified 12 improvements over the past five years. These 12 improvements (detailed in Table C-13) had a weighted average construction cost of approximately $1.80 million per lane mile. In addition to local data, a review of recently bid projects throughout the state of Florida was conducted. As shown in Table C -14;--a total of 49 projects from 13 different counties provided a weighted average cost per'larie'mile of $2.18 million per lane mile. Based on this review, it was concluded that construction costs in Indian River County are lower than the costs observed elsewhere in thestate. More'specifically, roadways costs in Indian River County are approximately 83,percent of costs observed statewide. Due to the large amount of local data, the county(roadway construction cost; used to calculate the transportation impact fee was estimated at' $1.,80 million -Ter lane mile for urban -design county roadways. c, Table._C-6 Construction Cost:Adjustment — County_ Roads Road Type Construction Section Design Cost per. Lane r (1) I Distribution(2) Mile Weighted Constr. Cost per (3) ` Lane )Vlile Urban Design $1,800,000 34% $612,000 Rural Design $1,494,000 _`_ 66% $986,000 Weighted Average Construction Cost per Lane Mile $1,598,000 Table C-1) Z) Source: Appendix_C;;Table C-1-7.'(Items c and d) 3) ,,Construction cosi flier lane mile(Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Itemi2)-for each design type and added together. State Roadways A review of construction cost data for recent local state roadway capacity expansion projects identified three improvements with an average construction cost of approximately $2.95 million per lane mile. • SR 5 (US 1) from S. of Oslo Rd to S. of Indian River Bend • SR 60 (Osceola Blvd) from W. of 82nd Ave to 66th Ave/CR 505 • SR 60 (Osceola Blvd) from W. of 1-95 to W. of 82nd Ave/CR 609 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County C-5 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In addition to looking at local data, a review of recently bid projects located throughout the state of Florida was conducted. As shown in Table C-15, a total of 52 projects (including the three projects in Indian River County) from 26 different counties estimated a weighted average cost per lane mile of $2.44 million per lane mile. Due to the lower construction costs observed between local county roads and statewide county improvements, and the small sample size of local state road improvements, the estimated state road construction cost was adjusted downward to provide a conservative estimate for use in the impact fee calculation. This adjustment was based on the ratio of local county roadway improvements to statewide county_roadway improvements, which, as previously mentioned, is 83 percent. Therefore, theweightedaverage construction cost per lane mile for all state road improvements (including local and statewide data) was adjusted by 83 percent. Based on this analysis, a construction cost of $2.00'million per lane mile for urban -design state roadways was used to calculate the transportation impact fee for Indian River County County. `_ TableC-7 Construction Cost Adjustment — State Roads Road Type Construction I Cost per LaneConstr. ") Mile Section Design Distribution ' Weighted , Cost per 13) :... , Lane Mile i Urban Design $2,000,000. 34% $680,000 Rural Design $1,660,000 66% $1,096,000 Weighted Average Construction Cost per Lane Mile $1,776,000 • ; (1) Source Table,C-15 Rural design is estimated at 83% of urban design costs 2) Source. Appendix C, Table!C117 (Items c and d) (3)\Construction cost, -per lane, -mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section • design weight (Item'2) for eacli:design type and added together. 5 Construction Engin Bring/Inspection County Roadways The CEI cost factor for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the CEI -to -construction cost ratios for county road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For county roadways, the CEI factors ranged from 4 percent to 14 percent, with a weighted average of 9 percent. For purposes of this update study, the CEI cost for county roads was calculated at 9 percent of the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-16 for additional information). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County C-6 Impact Fee Update Study 0 • a Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-8 CEI Cost Adjustment — County Roads Road Type CEI Cost per Lane Mile(i) Section Design, Distribution(z) Weighted -CEI)" Cost per Lanel i. Urban Design $220,000 34% Mile i Urban Design $162,000 34% $55,000 Rural Design $134,000 66% $88,000 Weighted Average CEI Cost per LaneMile $143,000 (1) CEI cost is estimated at 9% of construction cost basedfon recent TIF studies in Table C-16 (Item a). (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d),E:f3 (3) CEI cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by theassociated`s ection design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. State Roadways The CEI cost factor for state roads was estimated: as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a re iew of the CEI -to -construction cost ratios for state road unit costs in -previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For state roadways, the CEI ranged from 8 percent to 17 percent, with a weighted average of 113percent. For purposes of this.„updatee:study, the CEI cost for state :_\ _s roads was calculated at=11 percent of the`construction'cost.per lane mile (see Table C-16 for �z additional information)._ Table C;5 CE ,Cost Adjustment= State Roads Road Type CEI Cost per Lane, Mile SectionDesign '2' Distribution Weighted CEI ” Cost per Lane Milef,.. (3) Urban Design $220,000 34% $75,000 Rural Design $183,000 66% $121,000 Weighted Average CEI Cost per Lane Mile $196,000 (1) CEI cost is estimated at 11% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in Table C-16 (Item1b) (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) CEI cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County C-7 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • • Table C-10 Design Cost Factor — County & State Roads Year 2006 County Collier County Design Roadways Constr. $2,558,546 Design Ratio ,,, .,::'1.3% Design State Roadways Constr. Design Ratio $323,639 $349,643 $3,385,978 10% 2006 Citrus $361,774 $2,584,099 ,.,, ''',,':,./ 14% r. $400,432 $2,860,227 14% 2006 Highlands $235,030 $1,678,785 ': ':"- 14% `••., $347,326 $2,480,900 14% 2006 Marion $185,333 $1,941,244 2` 10% ' •.: ,$154,643 $1,430,919 11% 2007 Pasco $246,324 $3,079,051\ 8% •$427,112 $3,050,799 14% 2007 Lake $232,882 $2,911,021''' .' , ,8% $318,412 $3,184,125 10% 2007 Flagler $174,000 4.;,$1,740,000 a: "° .,:410% '\,; ', - n/a 2007 Volusia $291,696 "$2651,.778 `,;•'11% $309,526 $3,095,258 10% 2008 Leon $212,800 ''$2;660.000.,, \,8%° $372,130 $3,383,000 11/0 2008 Sumter $178,960 $2;237,000'" 8% $238,000 $2,380,000 10% 2009 Collier ,$217,000 $3,100;000 7.2-:i'.;-,.. 7% \; $320,000 $3,200,000 10% 2009 Polk .$95,400 \ $1,59000 H ~:==~-`~-. 6% $217,000 $2,170,000 10% 2009 Hillsborough/Tampa ``:;,;;`'$308,000 `,,.:x , 2,800,000 • $ ,_. 11%12% $420,000 $3,500,000 2010 Collier $119,560 $1,708,000-- , 7% $241,800 $2,418,000 10% 2011 Sarasota/North Port r.,.,. $240,000': $2,400,000 10% $200,000 $2,000,000 10% 2012 Osceola ,. 1i:4 •i'' l._ ,:^ $371,196 '�,,,_$313,258 "', $2,651,400 , '',7,7.5 = 14% $2,847,800 ° 11/0 2012 Orange f- iY '44:$264,000 \ ,'• $2,400,000 "_' ' 11% - - n/a 2012 City of Orlar da:, $288;000 \<,$2;400,000 12% $319,000 $2,900,000 11% Average '•'a;*; $241;422 $4393,940 10% $309,268 $2,767,938 11% Source: Recent impact fee studies constructed throughout Florida yw6. . 7, k1'4 (a) (b) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 C-8 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-11 Right -of -Way Factor — Recent County Road Improvements in Indian River County I Project #1 05013 Description 17th Lane SW From � 27th Ave To 20th Ave Bid Year 2008 II Status Completed Feature I 2 to 3 Lanes Section Desig n ;Urban Length II ( Milesj 0.52 Lanes Added 1 I Lane � Miles I Added 0.52 Rig ht -of- Way Cost - Construction i Costs $525,000 ROW/ Constr.lzl - 06026 20th Ave SW 21st St SW 17th Lane SW 2008 Completed 1U to 2D "La -ries", Urban,\ 0.27 2 0.54 $1,886,715 06026 20th Ave SW 25th St SW 21st St SW 2009 Com feted 0to,2 Canes Urban •. ,,\0.25 2 0.50 06047 College Lane Rd Extension IRSC 66th Ave 2009 Completed ; 0 to 2 Lanes Urban ``":' 0.50 2 1.00 - $1,700,000 - 01014 16th St 66th Ave 74th Ave 2009 Completed .6to2 Lanes Urban 1:27 ', 2 2.53 $664,258 $3,109,321 21% 06021 66th Ave 16th St SR 60 2009 Completed, Oto 3 Lanes Urban 0.51 , 3 1.53 $3,758,300 $2,504,423 150% 02025 53rd St Kings Hw Lateral H Canal 2010 Com •feted 0to'4 Lanes Urban 2.04 ' . ' 4', 8.14 $3,221,638 $7,000,000 46% 02025 53rd St Lateral H Canal Indian River Blvd 2010 Com •feted Oto 4 Lanes/Urban 0.50 4 2.00 $1,500,000 $7,605,993 20% 06018 Oslo Rd, Ph. II 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2011 .a Com • feted 2U to 4D Lanes . Urb`an 1.20 3 3.60 $4,032,257 $4,531,822 89% 05004 Oslo Rd, Ph. III 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2012 `t :Ongoing 2U to 4D Lanes ' Urban 1.15 2 2.30 $245,445 $3,812,202 6% 02031 66th Ave 4th St 16th St 2012 rrOngiSing:- Oto 2U/2D ', Rural 1.50 2/3 5.50 $765,946 $6,628,935 12% 06040 66th Ave SR 60 49th St 2012 'OK oing .,..=`2,to 4 Lanes '•Urban 3.05 2 6.10 10 567 637 20 773 389 51% Total 12.75 34.26 $24,755,481 $60,077,800 41% (1) Source- Indian River County (2) Right-of-way costs divided by construction costs _. t. r i r' ..r Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 C-9 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-12 Right -of -Way Factor — County & State Roads Year 2006 County Collier County ROW $1,751,790 Roadways Constr. $2,558,546 Design Ratio f''''.,•68%$1,751,790 — ROW State Roadways — — — — Constr. Design Ratio $1,751,790 $3,385,978 52/0 2006 Citrus $784,599 $2,584,099 ' r '' 30% `,',\,. $949,979 $2,860,227 33% 2006 Highlands $468,853 $1,678,785 28% '"\ $507,500 $2,480,900 20% 2006 Marion $1,005,123 $1,941,244:x,',' 52% ;',$868,908 $1,430,919 61% 2007 Pasco $814,517 $3,079,051'....,. 26% $1;560,714 $3,050,799 51% 2007 Lake $599,185 $2,911,021 `•,. '1/421% $1,462;133 $3,184,125 46% 2007 Flagler $460,000 zt;$1,740,000 '26% 1, n/a 2007 Volusia $858,109 '''''''$.i.-,-651,778 32% $954,543 $3,095,258 31% 2008 Leon $1,120,000 $2;660,000.,. •42% $1,363,000 $3,383,000 40% 2008 Sumter $802,000 $2;237,000 -7,.; `w.. 36% $1,400,000 $2,380,000 59% 2009 Collier $1,300,000 $3,100;000 --'..:242% , $1,300,000 $3,200,000 41% 2009 Polk .' $1,491,000 °, $1,59000 F..,._.J_. 4:94% ,� $550,000 $2,170,000 25% 2009 Hillsborough/Tampa ``\ $1,500,000'••, \ $2,800,000 54% $2,500,000 $3,500,000 71% 2010 Collier `-$901,000 ; -;$1,708,000-=, .,_ 53% $901,000 $2,418,000 37% 2011 Sarasota/North Port ;:,.•,- $620;000 ' .$2,400,000 '-- ;, 26% $800,000 $2,000,000 40% 2012 Osceola Alf it-414'''..:t;li 1,087,074 '' $2,651,400 , `i; 41%° $1,167,598 $2,847,800 41/ 2012 Orange k.:;':1724.71'.4 1/4-$13080,000 ', • $2,400,000 . - 45%- - n/a 2012 City of Orlar:1'8614, $1,08000 $2;400,000 45% $1,305,000 $2,900,000 45% Average;k,4., $984;625 $2,393,940 41% $1,208,885 $2,767,938 44% (a) Source. Recent impact fee studies constructed throughout Florida (b) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 C-10 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study s Table C-13 Construction Cost — Recent County Road Improvements in Indian River County • Project q 05013 Description 17th Lane SW I I From 27th Ave To 20th Ave Bid Year �l 2008 Status Com•leted Feature �� 2 to 3 Lanes.' Design , Urban '\ gth (Mion iles) 0.52 Lanes Added 1 Lane Miles Added 0.52 Way Cost - Construction 5525,000 Construction Cost per Lane 51,009,615 06026 20th Ave SW 21st St SW 17th Lane SW 2008 Com • leted 1U to 2D Lanes Urban • '" ,0.27 2 0.54 - 51,886,715 $3,773,430 06026 20th Ave SW 25th St SW 21st St SW 2009 Com • leted 0 to 2 Lanes' ' Urban ` , 0.25 2 0.50 06047 ColIe:e Lane Rd Extension IRSC 66th Ave 2009 Com•leted 0to2,Lane's Urban '0.50,', 2 1.00 - 51,700,000 $1,700,000 01014 16th St 66th Ave 74th Ave 2009 Com•leted ,, 0to 2;Lanes Urban 1.27. ;, ?., 2 2.53 $664,258 53,109,321 51,228,981 06021 66th Ave 16th SSttI11I1� SR 60 2009 Com • leted °., 0 to 3 Lanes Urban 0.51 ' ,' ':3. 1.53 53,758,300 $2,504,423 51,636,878 02025 53rd St LateralHCanal 2010 Com•feted 04o4Lanes Urban 2.04 i4 `N 8.14 53,221,638 $7,000,000 5859,951 02025 53rd St Lateral H Canal Indian River Blvd 2010 Com•leted Oto•4 Lanes Urban ` 0.50 4 , .2.00 51,500,000 $7,605,993 $3,802,997 06018 Oslo Rd, Ph. II 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2011 Com•leted 2U to 4D Lanes .Urban; 1.20 3 ' .3.60 $4,032,257 $4,531,822 51,258,839 05004 Oslo Rd, Ph. III 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2012 :::0Froing 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.15 2 `2:30 $245,445 53,812,202 $1,657,479 02031 66th Ave 4th St 16th St 2012 ';Oii:oin:' ;. , Oto 2U/2D Rural 1.50 2/3 5.50 $765,946 $6,628,935 51,205,261 06040 66th Ave SR 60 49th St 2012 On'bin :' : „:2 to 4 Lanes Urban r 3.05 2 6.10 10 567 637 20 773 389 53,405,474 Total 12.75 34.26 $24,755,481 $60,077,800 $1,753,584 Used in Impact Fee Study?) $1,800,000 (1) Source Indian River County (2) Right-of-way costs divided by construction costs (3) The weighted average construction cost per lane mile was,rounded for use_in:the impact fe '-calculation • Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County C-11 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-14 Construction Cost - County Road Improvements from Other Jurisdictions throughout Florida County Collier District 1 - Description Santa Barbara Blvd Ext. From Rattlesnake Hammock Rd To Davis Blvd Year 2008 Status Bid Feature Oto 6 Design Urban Length 2.00 Lanes Added 6 Lane Miles Added 12.00 Construction Cost 512,035,894 Construction Cost I per Lane Mile 51,002,991 Polk 1 Silver Connector Rd E.F. Griffin Rd U598 2008 Bid 0to2 Urban 0.33 2 0.66 51,560,483 $2 364 368 Polk 1 County Line Rd Ewell Ave Pipkin Rd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.20 2 2.40 53,993,892 51,664,122 Volusia 5 Debary Ave Deltona Blvd Providence Blvd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.84 2 3.68 57,405,914 52,012,477 Volusia 5 S. Williamson Blvd (Ph. II) 5. of Sabal Creek Blvd N. of Moody Bridge 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.91 2 3.82 511,109,225 52,908,174 Lake 5 CR 466 (Segment A) U5 301 CR 319 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.00 2 2.00 $4,062,660 52,031,330 Hillsborough 7 40th St River Pines Apts Humphrey 5t 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.95 2 1.90 55,154,862 52,713,085 Hillsborough 7 Race Track Rd (Ph. l) Douglas Rd Unebaugh Ave 2008 Bid 2to 6 Urban 1.01 4 4.04 510,099,911 $2,499,978 Osceola 5 John Young Pkwy Carroll Orange Co. Line 2008 Bid 4 t 6 Urban 0.85 2 1.70 53,230,000 51,900,000 Orange 5 CR 535 (Segments C and E) Ficquettc Rd Butler Ridge Dr 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.10 2 2.20 53,693,616 51,678,916 Orange 5 Clarcona•Ocoee Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd SR417 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 0,40 2 0.80 52,803,484 53,504,355 Orange 5 Destination Pkwy International Dr Tradeshow Blvd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.71 2 1.42 53,017,443 52,124,960 Lee 1 Gladiolus Dr(Ph. l) A&W Bulb Rd Winkler Rd 2008 Bid 2to4/6 Urban 1.94 2/4 5.44 513,971,509 52,568,292 Lee 1 Gladiolus Dr(Ph. ll) Pine Ridge Rd A&W Bulb Rd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.02 2 2.04 56,748,642 53,308,158 Charlotte 1 Toledo Blade Corridor North Port US41 r'' • 2008 Bid 2to4 Suburban 1.20 2 2.40 53,174,852 51,322,855 Orange 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Hiawassee Rd Clark r 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.50 2 5.00 510,182,738 52,036,548 Orange 5 Woodbury Rd S. of 5R50 Challenger Pkwy 2009' . Bid 2to4 Urban 0.65 2 1.30 $4,088,942 53,145,340 Orange 5 Sand Lake Rd President's Dr FL Mall ' ' i ' 2009 ' Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.00 2 2.00 56,020,755 53,010,378 Orange 5 Taft -Vineland Road Extension Central Florida Pkwy John Young Pkwy 2009' Bid 2to4 Urban 0.70 2 1.40 $4,462,535 53,187,525 Osceola 5 Narcoossee Rd 05192 Orange Co. Line ' 2009. Bid 2 to 4 Urban 7.40 2 14.80 547,360,000 53,200,000 Osceola 5 Osceola Pkwy (Ph. l) FL Turnpike Buenaventura Blvd 2009)1 . Bid 4to6 Urban 1.57 2 3.14 55,966,000 51,900,000 Osceola 5 Poinciana Blvd (Ph. II) Crescent Lakes U517/92 2009 ' 1; Bid 2 t 4 Urban 2.50 2 5.00 $16,000,000 53,200,000 Osceola 5 Old Lake Wilson Rd (Ph. 1) Livingston Rd Sinclair Rd 2009 ' !Bid 2to4 Urban 2.30 2 4.60 514,720,000 53,200,000 Hillsborough 7 Bruce B. Downs Palm Springs Blvd Pebble Beach Blvd 2009 Bid I' Oto 8 Urban 7.20 4 28.80 $40,575,305 51,408,865 Hillsborough 7 Race Track Rd (Ph. IV) Douglas Rd Hillsborough Ave 2009 . Bid 2 to 6 Urban 0.56 4 2.24 54,397,412 51,963 130 Sarasota 1 Fruitville Rd (Ph. l) Tatum Rd Debrecen Rd 2009 '' • Bid 2 to 4 Urban 0.72 2 1.44 $4,355,796 53,024,858 Sarasota 1 Fruitville Rd (Ph. ll) Coburn Rd Tatum Rd . 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.26 2 2.52 $8,557,904 53,395,994 Lee 1 Colonial Blvd (CR 884) 1-75 5R 82 2009 Bid 4 t 6 Urban 2.70 2 5.40 514,576,393 52,699,332 Collier 1 Oil Well Rd (Segment 2) Immokalee Rd - Everglades Blvd 2009 Bid 2to4/6 Urban 5.05 2/4 10.92 516,759,586 51,534,761 Collier 1 Oil Well Rd (Segment 4) Oil Well Grade Rd - W. of Camp Keais Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 6 Urban 4.72 4 18.88 517,919,244 5949,113 Orange 5 Alafaya Tr . Avalon Park Blvd ' Mark Twain Blvd 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 3.83 2 7.66 518,918,599 52,469,791 Hillsborough 7 Boyette Rd (Ph. III) McMullen Rd Bell Shoals Rd 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 523,184,354 54,458,530 Broward 4 Bailey Rd NW64th Ave / SW 81st Ave SR7(US 441) 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.00 2 4.00 56,330,297 51,582,574 Lee 1 Six Mile Cypress Pkwy Daniels Pkwy 5. of Winkler Rd Ext. 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 3.09 2 6.18 56,711,242 51,085,961 Charlotte 1 Piper Rd Henry St Jones Loop Rd 2010 Bid 2to4 Suburban 2.10 2 4.20 58,627,803 52,054,239 Sarasota 1 North Cattlemen Rd Richardson Rd Desoto Rd 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.55 2 5.10 512,153,584 52,383,056 Lee 1 Daniels Pkwy Chamberlin Pkwy Gateway Blvd 2011 Bid Oto 6 Urban 2.05 2 4.10 52,906,553 5708,915 Orange 5 Rouse Rd 5R50 - Corporate Blvd 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 529,380,249 55,650,048 Orange 5 CR 535 Seg. A Magnolia Park Ct 5R 429 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.37 2 2.74 58,390.570 53,062,252 Osceola 5 Goodman Rd Tri -County Sand Mine Rd 2011 Bid Oto 2 Urban 3.53 2 7.06 57,060,000 $1,000,000 Pinellas 1 Bryan Dairy Rd Starkey Rd (CR 1) 72nd St 2011 Bid 4 t 6 Urban 1.47 2 2.94 510,327,383 53,512,715 Palm Beach 4 SR 806 (Atlantic Ave) W. of Lyons Rd Starkey Rd 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.80 2 1.60 55,307,643 53,317,277 Paler Beach 4 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd SR 80 N. of Sycamore Dr 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 4.30 2 8.60 59,733,669 51,131,822 Charlotte 1 Burnt Store Rd (Ph. I) US 41 Notre Dame Blvd 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.40 2 4.80 513,512,394 52,815,082 Palm Beach 4 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd M Canal 5. of Orange Blvd 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.30 2 2.60 53,646,523 51,402,509 Polk 1 Kathleen Rd (C6356) (P8. 11) Galloway Rd Duff Rd 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 3.00 2 6.00 516,784,760 52,797,460 Polk 1 Bartow Northern Connector(Ph. l) US98 U517/92 2012 Bid 0to4 Urban 2.00 2 4.00 511,110,205 52.777,551 Volusia 5 Tymber Creek Rd 5R40 Peruvian In 2012 Bld 2to4 Urban 0.75 2 1.50 55,276,057 53,517,371 Collier 1 Collier Blvd (CR 951) Golden Gate Blvd Green Blvd 2013 Bid 4to6 Urban 2.74 2 5.48 521,392,039 53,903,657 Total 242.90 5528,758,921 $2,176,858 Source: Roadway bids from recent impact fee studies throughout Florida as well as recent bids from the TOA Cost Database, with info mation having been provided by each respective County Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 C-12 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-15 Construction Cost -State Roads County Walton District 3 Description 5883 (US 331) From 5R30 (US 98) To S. end of Choctaw Bridge Vear 2008 Status Bid Feature 2to4 0 esign Urban length 2.08 1 Lanes Added 2 a Lane Miles Added 4.16 Construction Cost 511,649,363 r Construction Cost per lane Mile 52,800328 Hillsborough 7 U5 301 (SR 43) 5. of Balm Rd N. of Glbsonton Rd 2008 Bid 2 to 6 Urban 6.03 4 24.12 555,702,777 52,309,402 Indian River 4 SR 5 (US 1) 5. of Oslo Rd S. of Indian River Bend 2008 Bld 4to6 Urban 1.70 2 3.40 514,953,562 54,398,106 Indian River 4 SR 60 (Osceola Blvd) W. of 82nd Ave 66th Ave/CR 505 2008 Bid 4to6 Urban 2.15 2 4.30 518,496,793 54,301,580 Orange 5 SR SO Good Homes Rd Pine Hills Rd 2008 gid 4to6 Urban 3.63 2 7.26 535,929,914 54,949,024 Leon 3 SR 10(Mahan Drive) Dempsey Mayo Rd Walden Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 3.10 2 6.20 518,083,510 52,916,695 Indian River 4 5R 60(Osceola Blvd) W. oft -95 W. of 82nd Ave/CR609 2009 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.07 2 6.14 57,366,557 51,199,765 Sarasota 1 U5301 Wood St Myrtle Ave 2009 .Bid 4to6 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 518,372,050 53,533,087 Sarasota 1 U5301 Myrtle Ave Desoto Rd 2009 Bid" 4t06 Urban 1.00 2 2.00 58,293,271 54,146,636 Pasco 7 3541(SR 45) Tower Rd Ridge Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.84 2 5.68 512,685,027 52,233,279 Lee 1 5R 739 US 41 (S. of Alico) Six Mile Cypress Pkwy 2009 Bid Oto 6 Urban 2.77 6 16.62 520,663,929 51,243,317 Manatee 1 U5301 Ede Rd CR 675 2009 Bid 4to6 Urban 410 2 8.20 521,040,000 52,565,854 Marion 5 SR35(US 301) Sumter Co. Line 529'S. of CR 42 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.40 2 2.80 53,596,000 51 284 286 Miami -Dade 6 Perimeter Rd NW72 Avenue NW 57 Avenue r 1 I I 1 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.50 2 3.00 56,383,286 52,127 762 Polk 1 U527 N. of CR546 S. of SR 544 .111111 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.56 2 3.12 54,100,069 51,314,125 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) N. of CS% R/R Bridge S. of Commerce Rd 'HUH' 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 0.98 2 1.96 55,621,006 52,867,860 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281 (Avalon Blvd) Gulf Rd 5R 10(U5 90) '1111 i 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.78 2 3.56 59,150,583 52,570,388 5t. Lode 4 5R 70 MP 5.860 MP 10.216 '111 1, 2009 II Bid 2 to 4 ' Urban 4.36 2 8.72 512,426,020 51,425,002 Sumter 5 SR 35 (05 301) N. of CR 204 Marion County Line 2009 , ' Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.51 2 3.02 53,856,688 51,277,049 Washington 3 SR79 N. Environmental Rd Stockland Rd 12009 'Bld 2t04 Urban 1.72 2 3.44 $8,877,323 52,580,617 Lake 5 SR 50 E. of Grand Hwy W, of Hancock Rd ' 2010 Bid 4 t0 6 Urban 1.30 2 2.60 $4,689,633 51,803,705 Polk 1 SR559 Extension 5R 655 (Recker Hwy) Derby Ave 2010 : Bid 0to2 Urban 0.69 2 1.38 $2,751,592 51,993,907 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281 (Avalon Blvd) SR8(1-10) S. of Moor's Lodge 2010 Brd 2t04 Urban 0.85 2 1.70 55,378,226 53,163,662 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) 5. of Moors Lodge N. of CS% R/R Bridge 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.48 2 2.96 57,145,212 52,413 923 Lee 1 U5 41 Corkscrew Rd .. San Carlos Blvd 2010 Bid "', 4to6 Urban 4.48 2 8.96 512,822,677 51,431,102 Polk 1 U598 S. of Manor Dr N. of CR 540A 2010"- BIds`t Ii 4 to Urban 3.32 2 6.64 511,092,909 51,670,619 5t. Lucie 4 5870 Okeechobee County Line MP 5.871 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 5.87 2 11.74 518,782,630 51,599,883 Polk 1 US 98 (Bartow Hwy) Brooks 5t Edgewood Dr 2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 0.72 2 1.44 54,341,917 $3,015,220 Hillsborough 7 CR39/Alexander St 5.051-4 N. of Knights Griffin " 2011 Bid 0to4 Urban 3.19 4 12.76 514,782,862 51,158,532 Pinellas 7 5R 688(Ulmerton Rd) E. of 119th St ' W. of Seminole Bypass 2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.50 2 3.00 516,908,929 55,636,310 Polk 1 SR60 (Van Fleet) W of US 98/Broadway W. of US 17 (SR 555) 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.86 2 1.72 $9,540,473 55,546,787 Lake 5 5R 500(US 441) Martin Luther King Jr.'Blvd Lake Ella Rd 2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.25 2 6.50 516,278,889 52,504,444 Hillsborough 7 SR 574(MLK Blvd) W. of Highvinw Rd \ E. of Parsons Ave - 2011 Bid 3to5 Urban 0.91 2 1.82 57,147,510 53,927,203 Collier 1 SR 84 (Davis Blvd) E. of Santa Barbara Blvd' . , W. of Radio Rd - 2012 Bid 2 to 6 Urban 1.77 4 7.08 510,956,198 51,547,486 Volusla 5 SR415 Seminole Co. Line Reed Ellis Rd 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.26 2 4.53 518,718,637 54,132,149 Volusia 5 5R415 Reed Ellis Rd 0.3 miles N. of Acorn lake 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 5.07 2 10.13 $18,388,845 51,815,286 Pinellas 7 3519(SR 55) N. of CR 576/Sunset Pnt S. of Countryside Blvd 2012 Bid 6to10 Urban 1.76 4 7.04 517,196,050 52,442,621 Miami -Dade 6 5R 823/NW 57th Ave W. 23rd 5t W. 46th St 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.48 2 2.96 514,081,161 $4,757,149 Memando 7 5R 50 (Cortez Blvd) US 19(SR 55) W. of CR 587/Mariner Blvd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 6.02 2 12.04 539,444,222 53,276,098 Orange 5 5R 50 E. of West Oaks Mall W. of Good Homes Rd 2012 Bid 4 to 6 Urban 0.45 2 0.90 $8,694,472 59,660,524 Clay 2 5R23 Oakleaf Plantation Pkwy Old Jennings 2012 Bid 0to2 Urban 3.14 2 6.28 513,231,111 52,106.865 Hendry 1 SR80 Birchwood Pkwy , Dalton Lane 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 5.03 2 10.00 512,855,092 51,285,509 Hendry 1 5880 CR 833 U527 2012 Bid 2t04 Urban 2.90 2 5.80 58,117,039 51,399,489 Lee 1 5R739 Winkler Ave Hanson 5t 2012 Bid 0to6 Urban 1.34 6 8.04 514,025,932 51,744,519 Seminole 5 5R434 1-4 Rangeline Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.80 2 3.60 510,111,333 52,808,704 Palm Beach 4 5R 710/Beeline Hwy W. of Congress Ave W. of Australian Ave 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.84 2 1.68 $12,189,533 57255674 Polk 1 U527 N. of Ritchie Rd 5. of Barry Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.20 2 6.40 514,242,918 52,225,456 Polk 1 US 98 (SR 35/58700) N. of CR 5404 55540 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.45 2 6.90 518,004,051 52,609 283 Brevard 5 SR 5(US 1) N. of Pine St N. of Cidco Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.84 2 7.68 529,360,536 53,822,986 Brevard 5 SR 507 (Babcock St) Melbourne Ave Fee Ave 2013 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.40 2 0.80 55,167,891 56,459,864 Hillsborough 7 SR 41 (US 301) S. of Tampa Bypass Canal N. of Fowler Ave 2013 Bid 2 to 4 Suburban 1.81 2 3.61 515,758,965 54,365,364 Lee 1 US 41 Business Uttleton Rd 5R739 2013 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.23 2 2.46 $8,488,393 53,450,566 Total 294.05 $717,943,565 $2,441,570 Total (Adjusted Indian River County Cost per lane Mile) 83% $2,000,000 Source: FDOT recently -bid projects by transportation district, available at www.dot.state.fl.us/ Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 C-13 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study • Table C-16 Construction Engineering/Inspection Factor — County & State Roads Year 200 County Collier County Roadways Constr. State Roadways CEI CEI Ratio CEI Constr. CEI Ratio $294,054 $2,558,546 ..11% $354,442 $3,385,978 10% 2006 Citrus $180,887 $2,584,099 �.,-,F 7%'17% $474,464 $2;860,227 2007 Pasco $215,534 $3,079,051 ill _; i 7% \=y " -• $442,849 $3,050,799 15% 2007 Lake $116,441 $2,911,021 , " ` 4% ','; $318,412 $3,184,125 10% 2007 Flagler $174,000 $1,740,000,'., 10% `'� - - n/a 2007 Volusia $238,660 $2,651,778\ t, 9% $309,526 $3,095,258 10% 2008 Leon $372,400 .•:,•$2,660,000 • /14% $270,640 , $3,383,000 8% 2008 Sumter $223,700 ''2,237,000 , 10% $238,000 $2,380,000 10% 2009 Collier $186,000 $3;100;000_-. <6% $320,000 $3,200,000 10% 2009 Polk $111,300 $1;590,000;1=.: ... 7%, $217,000 $2,170,000 10% 2009 Hillsborough/Tampa ,-$308000 $2,80000:' ; 11% , '`, $315,000 $3,500,000 9% 2010 Collier ,. $119560 '�:� $1,70000 :y;; -==.;''Z% $241,800 $2,418,000 10% 2011 Sarasota/North Port \ 'T,' '$216,000 `, :''; $2,400,000 , , 9%° $180,000 $2,000,000 9/0 2012 Osceola `•$265,140 -, :$2,651,406 :E:7, ,, 10% $313,258 $2,847,800 11% 2012 City of Orlando ,.,;;:r;::,.„ -' - $2;400,000 -'.- n/a - $2,900,000 n/a Average =j t = '" 41,41.1I14$215:834 , $2,466,931 9% $307,338 $2,882,707 11% (a) Source. Recent impact feel -t dies constructed thaghout-Florida (b) • Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County C-14 Impact Fee Update Study s • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Roadway Capacity As shown in Table C-17, the average capacity per lane mile was based on the projects in the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. This listing of projects reflects the mix of improvements that will yield the vehicle miles of capacity (VMC) that will be built in Indian River County. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County C-15 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-17 Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Jurisdiction ';I Description (County/State)'; 1 Cost Feasible Plan From 1 To 1 1 Improvement 1 Length I Lanes Added Lane it 1 Added Initial Capacity 1 Future Capacity Added Capacity Vehicle Miles of Capacity Added State US 1 Highland Dr St. Lucie Co. Line 4 to 6 0.62 2 1.20 39,800 59,900 20,100 12,462 State US 1 53rd St CR 510 4 t 6 4.30 2 8.60 39,800 59,900 20,100 86,430 County CR 510 CR 512 66th Ave 2 to 4 4.20 2 8.40 14,580 31,950 17,370 72,954 County CR 510 66th Ave US 1 2 to 4 1.60 2 3.20 14,580 31,950 17,370 27,792 County CR 510 US 1 Intercoastal Waterway 2 t 4 0.50 2 1.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 8,685 County CR 512 1-95 Willow St 2 to 4 , 3.10 2 6.20 12,780 27,360 14,580 45,198 County Oslo Rd 1-95 58th Ave , 2 to 4 ',, 3.60 2 7.20 14,580 31,950 17,370 62,532 County 43rd Ave St. Lucie Co. Line Oslo Rd I?'1:.2 to 4 2.00 2 4.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 39,780 County 43rd Ave Oslo Rd 16th St 11 IV 2 to 4 3.00 2 6.00 20,149 35,820 15,671 47,013 County 66th Ave 41st St 69th St - Mil 2 to 4 3.50 `2 7.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 60,795 County 66th Ave 69th St CR 510 '1.02 to4•dri I I 2.00 ' 2' 4.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 34,740 County 66th Ave CR 510 Barber St ;' ...,__. 2to4;i;i' 0.85 2 1.70 14,580 31,950 17,370 14,765 County 82nd Ave 26th St 69th St '• ••-••..___._ 0td 2;'t, 5.00 2 10.00 0 14,580 14,580 72,900 County 82nd Ave 69th St CR 510 -..__ '"' --_ , Oto 2 \:li? , 2.00 2 4.00 0 15,930 15,930 31,860 County 82nd Ave CR 510 Laconia St Oto 2 ' . ,' 0.60 2 1.20 0 15,930 15,930 9,558 County Roseland Rd CR 512 US 1 -. 2 to 4 '4:70 2 9.40 15,930 35,820 19,890 93,483 County Indian River Blvd 20th St Merril Barber Bridge 4to6 - 1.00 2 2.00 35,820 53,910 18,090 18,090 County Indian River Blvd Merril Barber Bridge 45th St - 4 to 6 2.00 2 4.00 35,820 53,910 18,090 36,180 County 25th St SW 27th Ave 58th Ave 7:7.= 2 to 4 1.80 2 3.60 15,930 35,820 19,890 35,802 County 26th St 43rd Ave 58th Ave 7- 2 t 4 1.00 2 2.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 19,890 County 27th Ave Oslo Rd ' - St. Lucie Co. Line 2 to 4 2.00 2 4.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 39,780 County 4th St 66th Ave 98th Ave 0 t 2 4.10 2 8.20 0 14,580 14,580 59,778 County 12th St 58th Ave 66th Ave . Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 53rd St 58th Ave 66th Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 '2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 53rd St 66th Ave 82nd Ave' Oto 2 2.00 2 4.00 0 15,930 15,930 31,860 County 69th St 66th Ave • Fellsmere N-5 Rd 1 Oto 2 7.00 2 14.00 0 14,580 14,580 102,060 County 58th Ave Oslo Rd St. Lucie Co. Line Oto 4 2.10 4 8.40 0 35,820 35,820 75,222 County 74th Ave 8th St Oslo Rd ' Oto 2 2.00 2 4.00 0 15,930 15,930 31,860 County 98th Ave 8th St 4th St' Oto 2 0.50 2 1.00 0 15,930 15,930 7,965 County Sth St SW Old Dixie Hwy 20th Ave 0 to 2 1.40 2 2.80 0 15,930 15,930 22,302 Unfunded Needs State US 1 CR 510 Shuman Dr 4 to 6 3.00 2 6.00 39,800 59,900 20,100 60,300 State US 1 Shuman Dr CR 512 4to 6 1.60 2 3.20 39,800 59,900 20,100 32,160 County CR 510 SR A1A Intercoastal Waterway 2 to 4 0.80 2 1.60 14,580 31,950 17,370 13,896 County CR 512 1-95 CR 510 4 to 6 2.60 2 5.20 31,950 48,150 16,200 42,120 County 26th St 58th Ave 66th Ave 2 to 4 1.00 2 2.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 19,890 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 C-16 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-17 (continued) Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Jurisdiction 1 Description (County/State), Unfunded Needs From To ILane Improvement Length t Lanes Added Added -T 1 Initial Capacity Future Capacity Added Capacity Vehicle Miles, of Capacity Added County Fellsmere N -S Rd 1 CR 512 69th St 0 to 2 3.50 2 7.00 0 12,780 12,780 44,730 County Fellsmere N -S Rd 2 CR 512 69th St 0 to 2 3.50 2 7.00 0 12,780 12,780 44,730 County Fleming St Airport Perimeter Rd CR 512 Oto 2 1.30 2 2.60 0 14,580 14,580 18,954 County Airport Perimeter Rd US 1 Roseland Rd Oto 2 2.40 2 4.80 0 14,580 14,580 34,992 County Fellsmere E -W Rd CR 512 Fellsmere N -S Rd 2 Oto,2 3.70 2 740 0 12,780 12,780 47,286 County 33rd St 66th Ave 74th Ave Oto 2 . 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 33rd St 74th Ave 82nd Ave ,:1Oto2 1:00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 74th Ave 26th St 33rd St till ,Oto2 0.50, 2 1.00 0 15,930 15,930 7,965 County 12th St 66th Ave 74th Ave If I f I ' 0 to 2 1.00. ' 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 1st St SW 58th Ave 82nd Ave 0 to 2 3.00 2 6.00 0 15,930 15,930 47,790 County 5th St SW 58th Ave 82nd Ave \ 0 to 2 . 3.00 2 6.00 0 15,930 15,930 47,790 County 13th St SW 20th Ave 58th Ave 0 to 2 • 2.50 2' 5.00 0 15,930 15,930 39,825 County 17th St SW 20th Ave 58th Ave `` 0 to 2 2.50 2 5.00 0 15,930 15,930 39,825 Total (All Roads : 220.90 1,823,639 County Roads: 201.90 91% (a) 1,632,287 State Roads: 19.00 9% (b) 191,352 Urban Section Design: 74.20 34% (c) Rural Section Design: 146.70 66% (d) Source: Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Note: Letter references (i.e., "a") are used to assist with footnotes and sourcing Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 C-17 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Appendix D Transportation Impact Fee 7 Credit Component Calculations \ • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Credit Component This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the credit component. Currently, in addition to the capital support that ultimately results from State fuel tax revenues, Indian River County also receives financial benefit from several other funding sources. Of these, County fuel taxes that are collected in Indian River County are listed below, along with a few pertinent characteristics of each. 1. Constitutional Fuel Tax (2C/gallon) • Tax applies to every net gallon of motor,and,die'sel fuel sold within a county. Collected in accordance with Article XII, Section 9 (c) of the Florida Constitution. • The State allocated 80 percent of this:tax-,to Counties after first withholding amounts pledged for debt service on bonds issued pursuant to provisions of the State Constitution for road and bridge purpo'ses': • The 20 percent surplus can'be used to support -the road construction'program within the county. ' • Counties are not required to share the_ proceeds of this tax with their municipalities. 2. County Fuel Tax.(1C/gallon) • Tax applies to every net gallon of motor- and diesel fuel sold within a county. • Primary purpose of these funds is to help reduce a County's reliance on ad valorem taxes: • • Proceeds are,to be used for transportation related expenses, including the reduction of,bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Authorized uses include acquisition of rights-of-way; the construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance, and repair of transportation facilities, roads, bridges, bicycle paths, i and pedestrian pathways; or the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes: • Counties are not.required to share the proceeds of this tax with their municipalities. 3. 1st Local Option Tax (up to 6C/gallon) • Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. • Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. • To accommodate statewide equalization, all six cents are automatically levied on diesel fuel in every county, regardless of whether a County is levying the tax on motor fuel at all or at the maximum rate. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 D-1 Impact Fee Update Study • 1 1 Indian River County l Impact Fee Update Study • Proceeds are distributed to a county and its municipalities according to a mutually agreed upon distribution ratio, or by using a formula contained in the Florida Statutes. Each year, the Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR) produces the Local Government Financial Information Handbook, which details the estimated local government revenues for the upcoming fiscal year. Included in this document are the estimated distributions of the various fueLtax revenues for each county in the state. The 2013-14 data represent projected fuel: tax' distributions to Indian River County for the upcoming fiscal year. In the table, tlie'fuel,,tax revenue data are used to calculate the value per penny (per gallon of fuel) that should be used to estimate the • "equivalent pennies" of other revenue sources: -=Table D-1 shows the distribution per penny for each of the fuel levies, and then the calculation of the weighted average for the value of a penny of fuel tax. The weighting procedure°takes into ,account the,diiffering amount of revenues generated for the various types of gas'tax revenues' The weighted average figure of approximately $0.74 million estimates the annual. -revenue that one penny of gas tax generates in Indian County. Table D-1 • Estimated FuelTax Distribution Allocated to Capital Programs for `Indian River County & Municipalities, FY 2013-14i1i Tax j ConstitutionalFuel Taz-,, Amount of Levy per Gallon `->^$0.02 Total Distribution j $1,592,578 Distribution Per Penny _ $796,289 County Fuel Tax` ` $0.01 $701,978 $701,978 1st Local Option (1-6 cents) _ ~` $0.06 $4,364,623 $727,437 Total\ -,- $0.09 $6,659,179 WeightedAverage _ .! $739,909 1) Source. Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research, http://edr.state.fl.us/content/local-government/reports/ (2) The weighted average -distribution per penny is calculated by taking the sum of the total distribution and dividing that value by the sum of the total levies per gallon (multiplied by 100). Gas Tax Credit A revenue credit for the annual gas tax equivalent expenditures on roadway capacity expansion projects in Indian River County is presented below. The two components of the credit are as follows: Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 D-2 Impact Fee Update Study • s Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • County gas tax equivalent pennies • State gas tax expenditures County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies A review of the County's historical roadway financing program (FY 2008-2013) and the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY 2014-2017 indicates that a combination of sales tax revenues, fuel tax revenues, impact fees, developer contributions, and grants are used to fund roadway capacity expansion projects. With the County's local option sales tax set to expire in 2019 and the re -adoption and dedication,,to.transportation unknown, a sales tax credit was given only for programmed expenditures`in the CIP. If.the sales tax is re -adopted in 2019 or a different revenue source is allocated -to transportation capacity to replace the sales tax revenues, these credit figures may,need to be revised. As shown in Table D-2, Indian River. County receives a credit of 5.6 pennies for the portion of non -impact fee revenues (excluding'sales tax) dedicated to capacity expansion projects such as new road construction, lane'additions;-and intersection improvements. "Table D-2' County Gas TaxEquivalent Pennies (Excluding Sales Tax (1) Source: Table.D-5 (2) Source. Table D5 (3) Source: Table.D;1', (4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 3) divided by 100 As shown in Table D-3, Indian River County receives a credit of 11.1 pennies for the portion of non -impact fee revenues (sales tax ONLY) dedicated to capacity expansion projects such as new road construction, lane additions, and intersection improvements. In the impact fee calculation, this credit will only be applied for five years, as the sales tax will not be considered a recurring revenue source for transportation capacity improvements. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County D-3 Impact Fee Update Study Cost of 1 Number of Revenue Equivalent Source ! Projects Years3) from 1 Pennies (4j Penny(- - Projected CIP Expenditures(FY 2014-2017)(1) -v, $18,612,373 4 $739,909 $0.063 Historical'CountyEx•enditures-(FY2008-2013)(�) $22,996,416 6 $739,909 $0.052 Total . ` _ $41,608,789 10 $739,909 $0.056 (1) Source: Table.D-5 (2) Source. Table D5 (3) Source: Table.D;1', (4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 3) divided by 100 As shown in Table D-3, Indian River County receives a credit of 11.1 pennies for the portion of non -impact fee revenues (sales tax ONLY) dedicated to capacity expansion projects such as new road construction, lane additions, and intersection improvements. In the impact fee calculation, this credit will only be applied for five years, as the sales tax will not be considered a recurring revenue source for transportation capacity improvements. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County D-3 Impact Fee Update Study • 1 • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table D-3 County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies (Sales Tax ONLY) Source Projected CIP Ex.enditures (FY 2014-2017)(1) Historical County Ex.enditures (FY 2008-2013)(2) Total Cost of Projects $59,458,414 $22, 319, 296 $81,777,710 Number of Years 4 6 10 Revenue from 1 I Penny(3) $739,909 $739,909 $739,909 Equivalent Pennies(') $0.201 $0.050 (1) (2) (3) (4) Source: Table D-6 Source: Table D-6 Source Table D-1 Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 3) divided by 100 State Gas Tax Expenditures In the calculation of the equivalent pennies of gas tax from the State, expenditures on • roadway capacity expansion spanning a 10 -year period4.from FY 2009-4o'FY 2018) were reviewed. For calculation purposes, the 10 -year period: was broken into two increments; historical (FY 2009-2013) and future;.(FY`2014-2018):;. Information on historical projects' funding and the future year estimates was obtained from'the`FDOT Work Programs and the County's FY 2014-2018-Transportation'.Improvement Program (TIP). The use of a 10 -year period, for purposes of developing a State credit:forroadway capacity expansion projects, results in a stable credit, as it accounts for the'volatility in FDOT spending in the county over short periods of time. , The Aotalzcost of the -s capacify=adding projec#s) for the five-year "historical" period and projected -in the five-year Transportation Improvement Program are as follows: • FY 20'09-'2013 work plan equates to 20.5 pennies • FY 2014-2018 work plan equates to 10.5 pennies The combined weighted average over the 10 -year period of state expenditure for capacity - adding roadway projects results in a total of 15.5 equivalent pennies, which is a slightly higher state credit than what is observed in most other counties. Table D-4 documents this calculation. The specific projects that were used in the equivalent penny calculations are summarized in Table D-7. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 D-4 Impact Fee Update Study • 1 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table D-4 Equivalent Penny Calculation for State Portion Source Projected TIP (FY 2014-2018)(1) Cost of Projects $38,959,997 Number of Years 5 Revenue from 1 Penny(3) $739,909 Equivalent Pennies �4� $0.105 Historical Work Program (FY 2009-2013)(2) $75,954,895 5 $739,909 $0.205 Total $114,914,892 10 $739,909 $0.155 (1) Source Table D-7, total cost of expansion projects (2) Source: Table D-7, total cost of expansion projects 3) Source: Table D-1 e' 4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from1 penny (Item 4) divided by 100 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County D-5 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County ( Impact Fee Update Study • Table D-5 Historical and Future Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures for Indian River County, FY 2007/08 to 2016/17 (excluding sales tax expenditures • Description Lane Addition (0 to 2) On/From/To Powerline Rd from Barber St to CR 510 FY 2007/08 5134,482 FY 2008/09 $478,904 1[ FY 2009/10 ' 50 FT 2010/11 11 50 FY 2011/12 50 4 FY 2012/13 50 FY 2013/14 50 I FY 2014/15 50 1 FY 2015/16 50 t FY 2016/17 50 Total 5613,386 Lane Addition (0 to 2) 37th St from 58th Ave to 66th Ave 5558,218 -54,341 $0 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 5553,877 Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th Ave to Timber Ridge 51,202,748 535,586 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 51,238,334 Lane Addition (0 to 2) College Lane Extension - IRSC 50 5400,000 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 $400,000 Widen to 5 Lanes CR 512 from Sebastian River Middle to 1-95 52,745,686 5107,391 520,067 50 50 50 $0 $0 50 50 52,873,144 Lane Addition (Oto 2) 16th St from 66th Ave to 82nd Ave 5512,500 5266,380 5878,005 5110,351 50 $0 50 50 50 50 51,767,236 Lane Addition (1U to 2D) 20th Ave SW from 17th St to 25th St 519,662 5135 5837 5542,713 5153,032 50 50 50 50 $0 5716,379 Lane Addition (0 to 2) 66th Ave from 12th St to SR 60 5845,251 5927,608 $45,119 50 58,289 50 50 50 50 50 51,826,267 Widen to 5 Lanes 53rd St from Kings Hwy to US 1 50 50 50 5270,231 50 50 $0 50 $0 50 5270,231 Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th St to 43rd Ave 50 50 $25,748 $3,400 52,731 50 50 $0 50 50 531,879 Widen to 3 Lanes 66th Ave from 4th Ave to 12th St 5100,000 50 50 . ' / 52,052 $0 5500,000 50 50 50 $0 5602,052 Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 12th St to 18th St 50 50 : 50 i I 50 $0 50 50 5319,745 5500,000 53,500,000 54,319,745 Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 18th St to 26th St 50 50 I I i 150 50 50 50 52,805,330 53,102,938 5653,580 50 56,561,848 Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from SR 60 to 49th St $0 50 51,810,361 50 . ‘, 50 56,270,379 50 $0 50 50 58,080,740 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 6lstDrtoIndian River 50 50 X1$0 .n$0 \ $0 50 5130,780 50 50 50 5130,780 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 70th Ave to 61st Dr 50 50 $0 . .,0...$0 50 $403,691 5700,000 5600,000 $0 5500,000 52,203,691 Widento4Lanes CRSSOfrom CR512to70thAve 50 50 $0''1 50 50 $0 5400,000 5500,000 51,900,000 50 52,800,000 Right -of -Way Acquisition Miscellaneous 50 50 50 50 $0 5500,000 5500,000 5500,000 5500,000 5500,000 52,500,000 Widen to 4 Lanes Oslo Rd from 43rd Ave to 58th Ave 50 50 50 $0 50 52,869,200 50 50 50 50 52,869,200 Traffic Controllers Countywide 50 50 50 "50'• 50 5100,000 5100,000 5100,000 5100,000 5100,000 5500,000 Traffic Fiber Optic Countywide ,SO 50 •'.,. Sy 0! i} 50 5150.000_j150,000.... J150,000 5150,000150,000 750,000 Total 56,118,547 52,211,663 ___'L___.so 52,780,137 5928,747 5164,052 510,793,270 54,786,110 55,272,683 53,803,580 $4,750,000608,789 Historical and Future Time Period Totals - - - - 2008-2013: $22,996,416 - - - $18,612,373 - Source: Indian River County Planning Department / Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County D-6 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table D-6 Historical and Future Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures for Indian River County, FY 2007/08 to 2016/17 (sales tax expenditures ONLY • Description Lane Addition (0 to 2) On/From/To Atlantic Blvd, W of 58th Ave FY 2007/08 50 M FY 2008/09 5140,889 f FY 2009/10 $0 1 FT 2010/11 50 FY 2011/12 50 FY 2012/13 50 1 FY 2013/14 50 1 FY 2014/15 50 FY 2015/16 50 1 FY 2016/17 50 Total 5140,889 Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th Ave to Timber Ridge 521,303 $630 50 50 50 $0 50 50 $0 50 $21,933 Lane Addition (Oto 2) 16th St from 66th Ave to 82nd Ave 5145,447 577,209 5327,197 5309,944 50 $0 50 50 50 50 5859,797 Widen to 3 Lanes 17th Ln from SW 20th Ave to 27th Ave 52,295 549,462 51,986 $0 $0 50 50 50 $0 50 553,743 Widen to 5 Lanes 53rd St from Kings Hwy to U5 1 50 $36,387 50 51,523,628 50 50 50 50 $0 50 51,560,015 Add Left Turn Lane/Traffic Signal 1st St SW @ 27th Ave 50 50 50 $0 50 51,325,000 50 50 50 50 51,325,000 Add Left Turn Lane/Traffic Signal 1st St SW @ 43rd Ave 50 50 50 .-$0 50 51,325,000 50 $0 50 50 51,325,000 Add Left Turn Lane 20th Ave @ 16th St 50 50 50 $0 50 575,000 51,000,000 50 $0 50 51,075,000 Add Right Turn Lane 37th St @ Indian River Blvd 50 50 50 '$0 50 5105,000 50 50 50 $0 5105,000 Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 18th St to 26th St $0 50 50 50 50 50 50 52,179,834 54,453,580 50 56,633,414 Add Left Turn Lane 45 St/58th Ave 50 50 50 50 ' 50 5100,000 5100,000 5100,000 $0 SO 5300,000 Add Left Turn Lane 45 St @ US 1 50 50 , $0 11 50 50 $0 575,000 50 $600,000 50 5675,000 Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 33rd St 50 $0 . i i i l 50 $0 50 50 50 525,000 $0 5800,000 5825,000 Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 37th St 50 50 '11)150 50 \ \ 50 50 50 525,000 50 5600,000 5625,000 Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 69th St 50 50 '150 ill 50 \,. 50 50 50 525,000 50 5800,000 5825,000 Widen to 3 Lanes 66th Ave from 4th Ave to 12th St 50 50 50 . ' 1..50 50 52,781,381 50 50 50 50 52,781,381 Lane Addition (0 to 2) 66th Ave from 12th St to SR 60 $0 50 553,079 • ' 50 5810,238 52,027,084 50 50 $0 50 52,890,401 Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from 77th St to Sebastian City Limits 50 50 50 , 50 50 50 50 57,550,000 5500,000 50 58,050,000 Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from SR 60 to 49th St 51,517,365 51,479,765 58,435 51,073,395 5372,177 54,600,000 59,100,000 $0 50 50 518,151,137 Add Left Turn Lanes 69th St @ US 1 50 $0 -50 ' '50 -, 50 50 50 525,000 50 5600,000 5625,000 Intersection Improvements 4th St @ 82nd Ave $0 50 $0 50 , h $0 5755,000 50 $0 50 50 5755,000 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 530 from 61st Dr to Indian River 50 50 , \ 50 $0 50 50 50 5400,000 57,300,000 510,500,000 518,200,000 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 70th Ave to 61st Dr $0 \ ' $0 . 50 50 $0 50 $0 50 54,700,000 53,000,000 57,700,000 Intersection Improvements Miscellaneous 50 . 50 50 50 50 5600,000 5600,000 5600,000 5600,000 5600,000 53,000,000 Right -of -Way Acquisition Miscellaneous 50 - 50 50 $0 50 5500,000 $500,000 5500,000 5500,000 5500,000 52,500,000 Intersection Improvements Oslo Rd @ SR 60 - ' .50 • 50 - 50 $0 50 525,000 50 $0 50 50 525,000 Traffic Fiber Optic Countywide / 4. , •10 4 $0 i1S0.000 150,000 X150,000 150000 150000 5750,000 Total 51,686,410 51,784,342 5390,697 52,906,967 51,182,415 514,368,465 11,525,000 511,579,834 $1 $17,550,000 581,777,710 Historical and Future Time Period Totals - - - - 2008-2013: $22,319,296 - - - 559,458,414 - Source: Indian River County Planning Department Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 D-7 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table D-7 FY 2009 - FY 2018 Indian River County FDOT Work Program & Transportation Improvement Program - Capacity -Expansion Projects • Proj 8 203879-1 Description New Road Construction On/From/To 82nd Ave from 26th St to CR 510 1 FV 2009 1 $142,341 FY 2010 $132,786 FY 2011 $31,548 I FY 2012 $45,415 J FY 2013 547,443 I FY 2014 53,650,022 1 FY 2015 58,045,507 F FY 2016 11 $0 FY 2017 $0 FY 2018 $0 i Total $12,095,062 228583-2 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from St. Lucie Co. Line to 5 of Highland Dr $34,962 51,166 $164,904 $14,451,369 $375,523 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,027,924 228583-4 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from 5 of Highland Dr to 5 of Oslo Rd $1,986 532,957 $247,278 $12,419,012 5285,655 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $12,986,888 228583-5 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 5/US ] from 5 of Oslo Rd to S of Indian River Blvd $75,921 5391,440 $165,180 $72 $3,322 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5635,935 228613-2 Traffic Signals Indian River County Enhance Traffic Signal System 5200,000 535,750 $111,181 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 50 $346,931 228613-3 Traffic Signals Indian River County Countywide Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrades $0 50 $0 $656,578 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $656,578 228613-4 Traffic Signals Indian River County Countywide Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrades $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $706,543 $0 $0 $0 $706,543 228627-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 60/Osceola Blvd from W of 82nd Ave/CR 609 to 66th Ave/CR 615 $1,143,945 $15,786,537 51,635,891 $174,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,740,863 228628-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 60/Osceola Blvd from W of 1-95 to W of 82nd Ave/CR 609 5791,639 $4,050 5385,420 55,012,856 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,193,965 230872-1 Add lanes & Reconstruct 16/17th St from 500' W of 14th Ave to W of 5R 5/US 1 54,056,733 $168,834 $93,759 $249 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $4,319,575 404740-1 Traffic Signals Indian River County IPA Signal Maintenance & Ops on SHS $103,457 $102,679 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,136 410348-2 Interchange (New) I-95/SR 9 @ Oslo Rd Interchange $369 $0 $59,529 $1,154,840 $7,350 $0 53,400,000 50 50 $0 $4,622,088 416418-1 Traffic Control Devices/System Indian River County Signal System Group 3 $3,068,999 .579,254 $742 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,148,995 422914-1 Add Turn Lane(s) 17th St S. of Indian River Blvd in Vero Beach $0 .+'. 1 ' $0 $99,833 $1,150 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $100,983 425864-1 Add Turn Lane(s) Schumann Dr @ Barber St $0 ' v 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,690,000 $0 $0 51,690,000 425883-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct 66th Ave from SR 60 to 41st St $0'- •• $0 $0 $5,709,602 $560,777 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,270,379 427804-1 Traffic Signals Indian River City JPA Signal Maintenance & Ops on SHS 50 s'"1 • $0 5104,802 $107,576. $110,744 5114,600 $118,000 50 $0 50 $555,722 427804-2 Traffic Signals Indian River City JPA Signal Maintenance & Ops on SHS 50 '. $0 ' 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 5121,600 $125,000 5129,000 $375,600 430214-1 Funding Action 82nd Ave from 26th 5t to CR 510 $0 $0' / 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $2,835,946 $1,801,947 $2,749,141 $7,387,034 431521-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct Oslo Rd from SR 9/1-95 to 58th Ave $0 $0 \ 50 $0 $0 51,610,000 $0 $2,210,000 $0 $0 $3,820,000 431724-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from 53rd St to CR 510 $0 • $0 ‘1111 $0 $0 $11,000 $3,005,000 $5,000 $0 51,910,000 $0 $4,931,000 431759-1 Intersection Improvement SR60@ 43rd Ave -$0 $0 '1111 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,708,759 $1,120,000 51,169,000 $734,932 -54,732,691 433239-1 New Road Construction CR 512 SQ SI . i S9.. SQ -1364 040 512 SQ $,Q S0 $0 364 000 Total 59,620,352 516,735,453 53,100,067 539,733,209 56,765,814 58,379,622 513,983,809 57,977,546 55,005,947 53,613,073914,892 Historical and Future Time Period Totals - - . ' - 2009-2013: $75,954,895 - - - 2014-2018: $38,959,997 - Source: FDOT Gaming Reports for Indian River County and the FY 2014-2018 Transportation Improvement Program ' Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County D-8 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table D-8 Average Motor Vehicle Fuel Efficiency — Excludin Interstate Travel • Percent VMT Travel Vehicle Miles of Travel 21.4 (VMT) @ 6.3 Other Arterial Rural 15,048457,944 Other Arterial Rural 322,037'000000 462E7,000,000 368,204,000000 Other Rural 319'465'00\000 82'818'000,000 352'283,000,008 Other Urban 1'397'059,000,008 83'069'000,000 1,480'128,000,000 Total 2,038,561,000,000 162,154,000,000 2,200,715,000,000 • Percent VMT Fuel Consumed Gallons @ 21.4 mpg Gallons @ 6.3 mpg @%1.4mpg ! 87% Other Arterial Rural 15,048457,944 7,343,968,254 22,392,426,1E0 Other Rural 14,928'271'828 5,209'206'349 20,137'477'377 Other Urban 65'283'130'841 13.185'555,556 78,468'686,397 Total 95,259,859,813 25,738,730,159 120,898,589,972 • Percent VMT Total Mileage and Fuel 2,200,715 120,999 18.19 miles (millions) gallons (millions mpg Source: U.S. Departmenof Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2011, Section V, Table VM -1 Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data - 2011 by Highway Category and Vehicle Type huo://woww.Mhwa.dntgnv/oo|icvinhormation/stahsdo.chn nV � `^ Source. See Table D� sr. Tindale-Oliver & AssociatesInc. January 2014 Indian River County D-9 Impact Fee Update Study _ - -- @%1.4mpg ! 87% @63mpg 13% 91% 9% 94% 6% 93% 7% Total Mileage and Fuel 2,200,715 120,999 18.19 miles (millions) gallons (millions mpg Source: U.S. Departmenof Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2011, Section V, Table VM -1 Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data - 2011 by Highway Category and Vehicle Type huo://woww.Mhwa.dntgnv/oo|icvinhormation/stahsdo.chn nV � `^ Source. See Table D� sr. Tindale-Oliver & AssociatesInc. January 2014 Indian River County D-9 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table D-9 Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data (2011) - By Highway Category and Vehicle Typel/ Published March 2013 TABLE VM -1 L SUB LS I LIGHT DUTY LIGHT DUTY ITON SINGLE -UNIT 2 -AXLE YEAR ITEM VEHICLES MOTOR- CYCLES 161 BUSES VEHICLES SINGLE -UNIT TRUCKS 131 COMBINATION TRUCKS ALL LIGHT 6 -TIRE OR MORE ALL MOTOR VEHICLES SHORT WBI21 LONG WB(2) I VEHICLE51�1 AND COMBINATION I TRUCKS II Motor -Vehicle Travel (millions of vehicle -miles) 2011 Interstate Rural 140,603 1,243 1,670 42,961 9,495 47,616 183,564 57,111 243,587 2011 Other Arterial Rural 232,385 2,814 1,981 89,651 16,945 29,321 322,037 46,267 373,099 2011 Other Rural 226,037 3,016 2,052 93,427 18,090 14,729 319,465 32,818 357,351 2011 All Rural 599,026 7,073 5,703 226,040 44,530 91,666 825,065 136,196 974,038 2011 Interstate Urban 341,865 2,134 2,112 82,652 14,126 33,815 424,517 47,942 476,704 2011 Other Urban 1,102,519 9,293 5,967 294,541 44,859 38,210 1,397,059 83,069 1,495,389 2011 All Urban 1,444,384 11,427 8,079 377,193 58,985 72,026 1,821,576 131,011 1,972,094 2011 Total Rural and Urbanlsl 2,043,409 18,500 13,783 603,232 103,515 163,692 2,646,641 267,207 2,946,131 2011 Number of motor vehicles registered(2) 192,513,278 8,330,210 666,064 41,328,144 7,819,055 2,451,638 233,841,422 10,270,693 253,108,389 2011 Average miles traveled per vehicle 10,614 2,221 20,693 14,596 13,239 66,768 11,318 26,016 11,640 2011 Person -miles of travel(4) 2,839,083 19,927 292,192 805,888 103,515 163,692 3,644,971 267,207 4,224,297 (millions) 2011 Fuel consumed 88,536,602 425,410 1,932,823 35,325,791 14,183,270 28,193,355 123,862,392 42,376,625 168,597,250 (thousand gallons) 2011 Average fuel consumption per vehicle (gallons) 460 51 2,902 855 1,814 11,500 530 4,126 666 2011 Average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed 23.1 43.5 7.1 17.1 7.3 5.9 21.4 6.3 17.5 MV -9, and MV -10), other data such as the R.L. Polk vehicle data, and a host of modeling techniques FOr 2011, changes in a couple of States' truck VMT substantially impacted national truck VMT trends Upon further review with the States involved, FHWAstill considers these changes as material fact. However, FHWA will conduct further analysis when the 2012 data are reported by the States in 2013. (2) Light Duty Vehicles Short WB - passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles with a wheelbase (WM) equal to or less than 121 inches Light Duty Vehicles Long WB - large passenger cars, vans, pickup trucks, and sport/utility vehicles with wheelbases (WB) larger than 121 inches All Light Duty Vehicles - passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles regardless of (3) Single -Unit - single frame trucks that have 2 -Axles and at least 6 tires or a gross vehicle weight rating exceeding 10,000 lbs (4) Vehicle occupancy is estimated by the FHWA from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey(NHTS); For single unit truck and heavy trucks, 1 motor vehicle mile travelled = 1 person -mile traveled (5) VMT data are based on the latest HPMS data available, it may not match previous published results (6) The change in the number of buses is primarily due to the decline of reported public operated school buses v Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 D-10 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • AppendixE, Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule s Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table E-1 Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Gasoline Tax UM Construction Cost 52,591,000 Inteniale/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor: 17.3% $$ per gallon to capital: 50211 50.111 County Rev (No ST): 50056 Capa Hy per lane mile: 8,255 Cost per VMC. 5313.87 Facility life (yeah): 25 5 County Rev(50): 50.111 Fuel Efficiency: 18.19 mpg Administrative fee: 2.5% Interest 2.5% 2.5% Slate Revenues: 50.155 rate: liE LUC I, land Use Unit ,. Trip Rate 07510E14I14L: n ! Trip Rale Source I Tress Length 1I Tlen418 Elfec II li Trip length S0o,5.' Node sr ear. l %N Trips 365 i % New Trips Source I Net VAS II TOtJi �mpa[t tt IlAnnual 54. GJsl 0,04,3 m Tas I Sales faAnnual x 1' Sales Ci •djl .105,1 Gedil' Net FIOmu Jct ' Administrative 17/7411000 Inspect rent eP,l Chante 210 Single Family (Detached) du Less than 1,500 sf du 6 25 Fl Studies (NHTS, ABS Census) 6 62 7.12 FL Studies 10014 N/A 17.11 55,370 594 51,735 $50 $232 51,964 53,406 585 53,491 $3,048 15% 1,500 t08,499.5 du 781 FL Studies (NHTS. 405, Census) 661 7.12 Fl Studies 100% 5/4 21.38 56,710 $118 52,174 562 $288 $2,462 54,148 5106 54,354 54,595 .5% 2,500 sl or larger du 920 FL Studies (10175, 655, Census) 662 7.12 Fl Studies 100% N/A 2518 • 57,904 $139 52,561 $73 $339 52,900 55,004 5135 55,129 55,157 .1% 220 M..III.Famlly/Actessoty Unit du 660 Blend 1019th & Fl Studies 510 560 FL Studies (LUC 720/230) 100% , 1392 54,369 578 51,437 541 5190 51,627 $2,742 $69 52,811 52,489 13% 240 Mobile Home/RV (tied down) du 417 Ft Studies 4,60 510 Fl Studies 100% y 'N/As , I t1({ /A 7.93 52,490 545 3839 524 $111 5940 51,550 $39 51,589 51,789 .11% IRANINNT 493551E0, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 636 Blend ITE 9th &FL Studies 6,26 616 Fl Studies 1� 'girl, 66% FL Studies 1087 53,450 560 $1,105 532 $149 51,254 52,156 $54 52,210 52,874 .23% 320 M0to1 room 563 ITE 9th Edition 434 484 FL Studies 11(11) 77% FI StuEles'I'f 1)7. 78 1,7.74 52,442 \$44 5811 523 5107 5918 51,524 $38 51,562 31,554 1% 620 Nursing Home bed 276 Blend ITE 9th &Fl Studies 2.59 309 FI Studies . .Ili , _, 8914 FL Stud01 s1 IIj' I • 2.63 $826 516 5295 58 537 $332 $494 512 5506 $443 14% 252 Assisted Care Liwng Facility ACLF Y ( 1 bed 2.97 Blend ITE 9th &FL Studies 3,28 3 78 FL Studies •"• ::.Same es LUC 253 i72X -(ice Appendix BI ll 1, r 2.90. $910 517 $313 $9 542 $355 $555 514 5569 $636 11% OFFICE6 RNANOAI: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,0002( or less 1,000 sf 2383 FL Mudie,ry (Collier County) 5.55 605 Fl Studies ' t 89% FL Studies 4867a 1 .(.515,277 5372 $5,011 $143 $64 55,675 $9,602 $240 59,312 513,746 •28% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,0000 1,000 0 3472 Blend ITE 9th & FL Studies 555 605 / Fl Studies _ 89% '01. Studies 70.91 522,258 $396 57,296 $208 $966 $8,262 $13,996 5350 514,346 513,746 4% 911 Benk/Sawngs Walk.. 1,000 sl 121.30 ITE 9th Edition 2.46 2.96 •4me as lUC 912 46% S.me es LUC 912 56.76 517,815 $350 56,449 5184 5855 57,304 510,511 $263 510,774 510,900 .1% 912 Bank/Savings Dnvean 1,00011 159.34 Blend ITL 9th & FL Studies 2.46 2,96 FL Studer . - 46% FL Steadies 74.56 573,401 $459 $8,457 5242 51,124 $9,581 513,820 5346 514,166 513,346 6% 710 General Office 1,00011 11.03 ITE 90. Edition 5.15 5.65 Fl Studies • 91% FLStidi2, 21,61 56,783 5121 $2,229 564 $297 52,526 $4,257 5106 $4,363 53,893 12% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000,1 8.11 ITE 911104:5:00 7 "538' 588 Same as 111C 770 (see Appe.Mla B) ' Same as LUC 770 89% (see Rppendi. 5) 1606 55,040 590 51,658 $47 $218 $1,876 53,14 979 53,243 $2,868 13% INOUSTR4L' 140 Manulactudne 1,00(1 sl 3 82 ITE 9015dltl0n 5.15 5 65 5ame as 1 UC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 7.48 $2,349 $41 5774 572 $102 5876 51,473 $37 51,510 $1,351 12% 150 Warehousing 1,000 sl 3.56 ITE 91h Edition 5.15 \ 5,65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 6.97 $2,189 $39 5719 $21 $98 5817 51,372 $34 51,406 51,159 12% 151 MInI.Warehouse 1,000,1 2.15 Blend ITE 9th & FL Stud., 310 3.60 Fl Schedules 92% Same as LUC 710 2.54 5796 515 5276 $8 537 $313 543 $12 $095 5884 d4% 110 General light Industn a I 1,000,1 697 ITE 901E41(1On 515 5.65 5anm as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 1366 54,286 577 51,419 540 $186 51,605 52,41 567 $2,748 52,44 17% n/a Conc.0,4 Plant acre 15 60 2005 IRC Impact Fee Study 515 5 65 .Sam. as 1110 710 92% Sarno as LUC 710 36 96 511,600 5172 53,169 $90 $418 53,587 58,013 5200 58,213 59 517 49% 0/2 Sand Mining acre 2.00 2035 IRC Impact Dee Study 5,15 5 65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 • 4 74 51,487 $22 5405 $12 556 5461 51,026 526 51,052 5707 490 4048: 820 Retail 1,000 slgla 4270 ITC 9th Edition 24 314 Fl Curve 73% Fl Curve 3403 510,680 5207 53,814 $109 5506 $4,320 56,360 5159 56,519 $3242 101% 944/ 946 Gas Nlne/Service Station with 0r w/0 Car Wash fuel pm. 15733 Blend ITC 9th & FL Studies 1.90 240 FL Studies 23% Fl Studies 2843 58,923 $14 $3,390 597 5451 53,841 55,082 5121 55,209 55,727 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 0 2825 Blend ITE 9th & FL Studies 460 510 FL Studies 79% FL Studies 42.45 $13,324 $241 54,440 5127 5590 55,030 53,294 5207 59,501 510,361 .18% 932 Restaurant 1,000.1 11660 Blend ITE 9th & FL Studies 3.17 367 FL Studies 71% FL Studies 108.52 534,060 $43 511,47 5338 $1,570 513,417 $20,43 $516 521,159 $22,706 .7% Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 E-1 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table E-1 (continued) Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Its: j 1 Land Uar! Unit Trip Rale• 1, Trip Rate Source IUC I RETAIL: AasesNMe Trip length Total Trip l length Trip length Source %New Trips II %New Tri Source Trips - -I I Net VMTi'i loWllm Pact I Coat Annual Gaa LII., Gas lav I Credit 1 Annual 1 Sales Tav Sales tar Cr a., )OWI Credit et Impart I N Fee Administrative Total Net II fco(l,s%) I Impact Fee Current % Il Impact I.eelsll Change 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Dnve.Thru 1,000 sf 511.00 Blend CE 9th 6 FL Studies 205 2.55 FL Studies 58% Fl Studies 251.23 578,855 51,600 529,479 5842 53,912 533,391 545,464 51,137 $46,601 $35,651 31% 850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 10338 Blend RE 9th 6 FL Studies 208 2.58 Fl Studies 56% FL Studies 4979 $15,628 916 $5,822 966 5771 56,593 59,035 $726 59,261 511,458 -19% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf 31,43 Blend ITE 9th 6 Fl Studies 362 4,12 FL Studies 72% Fl Studies 3387 $10,632 5197 $3,630 $104 5483 54,113 $6,519 5163 $6,682 $8,026 -17% 947 5e10.5erwce Car Wash service bay 4394 Blend at 9th & FL Studies 2.18 2.68 FL Studies 68% FL Studies 26.93 58,454 5170 53,132 $89 $413 $3,545 54,909 $123 $5032 514,954 .66% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sl 775.14 Blend ITE 9th 6 FL Studies 1.51 2.01 FL Studies 28% FL Studies 135.52 542,534 $914 917,024 $486 $2,258 $19,282 $23,752 5581 513,133 $26,066 .9% 890 Furniture Store 1,1x011 506 ITE 910 Edition 609 659 FL Studies 54% FL Studies 6,88 . $2,160 $38 5700 $20 $93 $793 $1,367 $34 $1,401 51,407 0% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 3574 ITE 901E01110n 662 7.12 Same as LUC 210 90% Fl Schedules 88,05 ' $27,636 5485 $8,936 3255 $1,185 $10,121 517,515 5438 $17,953 $11,529 56% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 32 93 ITE 9th Edition 5 15 5.65 Sane as LUC 710 94% ) 11, Stu I FL 4es 65.97 520,690 $370 56,817 5195 $906 57,713 512 967 5314 513 291 511,095 20% 412 County Pah 03re 2.28 ITE 9th Edition 511 561 Fl Schedules 90% .i11 Schedules 4.34 51,361 '524 5442 $13 $60 5502 9859 $21 $660 5736 20% 491 Tennis Court court 38.70 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 S65 Same Sae as IUC 710 94% '1111)11 Same as LUC 4911 (Ilii .7747 $24,315 5435 $8,015 $229 $1,064 59,079 $15,236 $381 $15,617 512,485 25% 420 Manna boat berth 2.96 ITE 9th Edition 662 712 Sarre as 1.110 210 90% FL Schedules) 0.1 I1', 7.29 $2,189 540 5737 $21 598 $835 $1,454 $36 $1,490 $997 49% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000 s1 108.19 ITE 9th Edinon S 15 5,65 Same as LUC 710 _ 35%- •10091RCTnmp Impact Fee Study 8064. Y. 525,310 5453 $8,346 $238 51,106 59,452 $15858 $396 516 254 514 554 1256 590 library 1,000 sf 5624 ITE 9th Edition 662 7.12 . Same as LUC' 210 85% 20091RC Trans 0. ' • Impact Fee Study 13086 I Ili 11:$41,072 5711 513,284 5379 $1,761 515,045 $36027 5651 $76678 $18 373 4556 733 Gwemment Office Complex 1,000 sf 27.92 ITE 9th Edition 5 15 5 65 Same as LUC 710 ' 97% 'Same as LUC 710 54.70 517,169 5307 55,656 $162 5753 56,409 510,760 5269 $11,029 59,873 1256 571 Jail bed 5.50 20051001mpac3 Fee Study 5 15 5.65 Same a1600 710 92% Same as LUC 710 10.78 53,382 561 51,124 $32 $149 51,273 $2 109 553 $2,162 $399 441% MISCELLANEOUS: - - 565 Day Care Center 1,000 s1 7188 Blend ITE 9th 8 FL Studies 203' -' 2.53 FL Studies 73% FL Studies 4405 $13,825 $281 $5,177 5148 5688 $5,865 97,960 5199 58,159 59,068 -10% 610 Hospital 1,000 s1 1322 ITE 9th Edition 662 7.12 Same as LUC 210 77% FL Schedules 27.86 58,746 5153 57,819 $81 5376 $3,195 $5,551 $139 5S,690 55,442 5% 640 Vetennery Clinic.. 1,000 sf 4012 ITE 9th Edition 5,10 5,60 Same ai IUC 630 (See Appendix 8) 93% Same as LUC 630 (see Appendix 8) 7868 524,697 5442 $044 $233 $1,082 $9,226 $15,471 5387 515,858 $3,599 341% 560 Church 1,000 s1 911 1009th Echti0n 390 440 FL Schedules 90% FL Schedules 13,22 54,150 576 51,400 540 $186 51,586 $2,564 $64 $2628 $2653 -1% 444 Movie Theater w/Marl nee screen 10663 Blend 1TE 6th 6 FL Studies 1.12 2.71 FL Studley 88% Fl Studies 86.14 $27,036 5540 59,949 5284 $1,319 511,268 $15,768 5394 516,162 573 312 .31% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 1.29 ITE 9th Edition 430 4 80 , \ FL Schedules 80% FL Schedules 1.83 5576 $10 $184 $6 518 5212 $364 $9 5373 $153 144% 522 Middle School (Private 6.8) student 1.62 ITE 9th Edition 430 480 FL Schedules 90% Fl Schedules 2.59 $814 $15 $276 58 537 5313 $501 $13 $514 $153 236% 530 High School (Private 9.12) student 1.71 ITE 901 Edition 430 480 FL Schedules 90% Fl Schedules 2.74 5859 $16 $295 $8 537 $332 $527 $13 $540 $551 .2% 540/ 550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student 200 ITE Regression Analysis 662 7.12 Same as LUC 210 9056 FL Schedules 4.93 _(,547 527 5497 $14 $65 5562 $985 $25 $1,010 5669 51% r(Private) n/a Fire Station 1,000 sl 5 40 2005 IRC Impact Fee Study 2.07 2.52 2009 IRC Transp Impact Fee Study 89% 2009 IRC Tramp, Impact Fee Study 4 01 $1.260 526 5479 513 560 5539 $721 518 5739 $1008 .77% 1) Ne[ VMT is calculated as ((Trip Generation Rate' Trip Length' % New 1 rips)•(1-Interstate/Toll Fatuity Adjustment Factor)/2). This reflects the unit of vehicle miles of capacity consumed per unit of development and is multiplied by the cost per vehicle 2) Existing impact fees include a 2.5% adm'nistrative fee. 3) The walk-in bank land use was added back into the ITE 9' edition handbook, as it was removed from ITE 8" edition. The recommended rip generation rate is based on the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4pm and 6pm) multiplied by 10 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the veterinary clinic is based on the peak hour of adjacent street traffic from ITE 916 edition, multiplied by 10 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 E-2 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Appendix Building and Land Values Supplemental Information for Correctional, :Law Enforcement, Emergency Services, Public Buildings,Library, Solid Waste and Parks and Recreation Impact Fees S • �. l Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study This Appendix provides a summary of building and land value estimates for all impact fee program areas with the exception of transportation and educational facilities. Information related to transportation cost estimates is included in Appendix C and cost estimates for educational facilities is included in Appendix G. Building Values For all of the program areas, the following information was" -reviewed to estimate building values: • Recent construction completed by Indian,River County;(if'any); • Estimates for any planned facilities; • Insurance values of existing facilities;;: / • Data from other jurisdictions for recentlyscompleted<facilities, and- • Discussions with architects/contractors. \s/- The \/ The following paragraphs provide a summary for each program area. Correctional Facilities As presented in Table: F-1, the""construction`cost associated with the County's most recent jail addition (completed :in 2008) was $288: per square foot. There are no estimates available: for= future jail additions,. and'the insurance values of the existing jail buildings ranged .from $140 to.$220 -per square foof._-,,It is important to note insurance values are cons• id'e`red to provide,estimatesbelow the full cost since they typically do not take into consideration certain building components, such as foundation, architectural/design cost, furniture/fixture/equipment;;security features, etc. Recent jail constructionin other' Florida counties and estimates obtained from construction companies and architectssuggested a range of $225 to $445 per square foot. Given all this information, a unit cost of $250 per square foot for jail buildings is used in the study. This figure is approximately 8 percent higher than that used in the 2005 study ($232 per square foot) and 22 percent lower that the figure used in the 2007 impact fee study ($321 per square foot). Given that the most recent jail construction in Indian River County was completed at a cost of $288 per square foot, $250 per square foot represents a conservative estimate. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 F-1 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-1 Correctional Facilities Building Cost Source Construction of IRCJaiI Unit El1i Year Building Cost per Square Foot 2008 $288 Estimates for a Future Jail N/A N/A Insurance Values of Existing Jail Buildings(2) 2013 $140- $220 Recent Jail Construction in Other Florida Counties(3) 2009, 2013 $225 Estimates from National Construction Companies(4) ;..'2013 $270-$300 Estimates from Florida Architects(5) `2013 $285-$445 Used in the Study `2013, $250 (1) (2) (3) Source. Indian River County Source. Indian River County, figures rounded to nearest $10 Source: AJAX Engineering and Florida Department of Correctional Facilities -figures rounded to nearest$10 ` (4) Source: Reed Construction = ', (5) Based on discussions with industry architects for a.range•of atypical jail in Florida.based on their experience To determine the building value of `the support facilities, such as the guard house, maintenance shop, etc:T. insurance value of theexisting buildings was reviewed. This • analysis suggested a unit cost -of $125 per square foot``<' Emergency Services Facilities -. - S - As part: of -this contacted several` Florida jurisdictions to obtain more recent costinformation. The bids arid•estimates received -in 2010 for facilities built in 2010 or 2012 range' from $190 to $300,per square foot (excluding furniture/fixture/equipment, site preparation -cost, permits, 'tee and`otlier similar expenses). The following chart presents the building'construction cost trends based on bids, estimates, and other information obtained during'`the‘previous irnpact fee studies completed by TOA. As presented, the variation in station costss,isrelatively minor over the past few years. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 F-2 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Figure F-1 • • $300 $250 - $200 $150 $100 - $50 - $0 Fire/EMS Station Construction Cost per Square Foot 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: Fire station construction .cost data collected from:Florida jurisdictions In determining the appropriate unit cost"for station construction,in Indian River County, in addition to these trends, the -following data:was evaluated_ `a • • The most recent,, fire' station expansion and renovation project cost was - i approximately $3(j0 per square.foot:-(Stations 9 and 12). County's=current Capital Improvement Plan includes an estimate ranging from $280 to $325 for a prototype fire station. • The insurance value_ of existing)fire stations is $190 per square foot, which is considered to be a conservative value. Based on the informationsummarized in Table F-2, a unit cost of $260 per square foot is used for fire station building"value. This figure is based primarily on local construction cost and estimates in Indian River County and is also consistent with statewide trends. Finally, it is almost the same unit value used in the 2005 study and approximately 5 percent lower than that used in the 2007 study ($273 per square foot). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 F-3 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-2 Fire Station Building Cost Source � Expansion of Stations 9 and 1211 Year 2010 Building Cost per Square Foot $300 Estimates for Stations 13 and 14(2) FY 2013 - FY 2017 $280 to $325 Insurance Values of Existing Fire Stations(3) 2013 $190 Recent Fire Station Construction in Other Florida Counties(4) 2010-2012 $190- $300 Estimates from Florida Architects(5) r3 j 1< .2013 $230- $280 Used in the Study{` {-" " 2013 $260 1) 2) 3) (4) (5) Source. Indian River County Source: Indian River County Capital Improvement Plan Source: Indian River County, figures rounded to neares t $10 Source: Individual jurisdictions Based on discussions with industry architects fora,ran'ge of a typical jail in Florida based on their experience (includes adjustment for ff&e, site preparation, permits, etc.) In addition to fire stations, the Emergency Services,buildinginventory includes the Training :-r Tower, which was built in 2008. The•tower,--was built for $150 per square foot, which is also X used in the impact fee calculations. •• ' '-• Law Enforcement , - - :, Law enforcement buildings tend, to include- ;a wide range of buildings, such as office buildings, crime scene buildings,. maintenance, sheds, etc. In addition, law enforcement facilities=tend to include both prime buildings'and support buildings, which tend to vary significantly in terms, of -.building• cost. Given this, it is difficult to have a comparable cost database'from other jurisdictions'since the combination of these different types of buildings vary froM,one jurisdiction.t&,another"Therefore, the estimates used in the impact fee calculations relied primarily on local data. t- 1 As presented in Table -F-3, .the County recently completed the conversion of a warehouse to a Crime Scene Investigation/Center, at a cost of almost $200 per square foot. In addition, the estimates obtained from the Sheriff's Master Plan for a future Sheriffs Office Building and a new Crime Scene Unit Facility range from $250 to $300 per square foot. The insurance values of existing buildings average $165 per square foot and the value of support facilities is $65 per square foot. Finally, the available data from other Florida jurisdictions suggests a range of $175 to $270 per square foot for law enforcement facilities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 F-4 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Given this data, the value of prime buildings is estimated at $200 per square foot and the support buildings at $50 per square foot. The value for support buildings took into consideration the insurance values of not only law enforcement support buildings, but also those of public buildings, as presented in Table F-4. These unit figures provided a weighted average cost of $197 per square foot, which is 50 percent higher than the value included in the 2005 study, which was based on historical costs provided by the County and is the same value included in the 2007 study. Table F-3 Law Enforcement BuildingValue Source Construction of Crime Scene Investigation Center •„ Year 2013;x=\ Building Cost per Square Foot $197 Future PlannedFacilities(2 N/A'; $250 to $300 Insurance Values of Existing Buildings (prime)(3) =` • 2013 '�. $165 Insurance Values of Existing Buildings.(support)(4 2013 ; $65 Recent Public Building Construction in -Other Florida Counties(,$).-", 2010-2012 $175 - $270 Used in the Study-- Prime Buildings - �:: ••2013 $200 Used in the Study-- Support Buildings ` • 2013 $50 ource: Indian River County (2) Source: Indian River County Sheriff's Master Pfan.. -1 ` 3) Source: Indian River County, includes buildings forwhich information was available 4) Source. Indian River County, includes buildings for -;which information was available 5) Recent impact fee studies, represents weighted average of prime and support buildings Public Buildings Similar, to>.Iaw enforcement buildihgs,public buildings also tend to include a wide range of buildingss.uch as offices,' courthouses, maintenance buildings, parking garages, etc. as well as prime ver'sussupport buildings. The most recent public buildings constructed in Indian River County were completed in' 2007. Given the changes in construction costs since then, these cost figures were= considered outdated and not used. The County has plans to add approximately 10,000 square feet of courtroom space over the next five years, and the cost associated with this expansion is estimated at $200 per square foot. As presented in Table F-4, the insurance value of existing prime buildings averaged $210 per square foot and support buildings averaged $46 per square foot. Finally, the building value of prime and support facilities in other Florida jurisdictions for which information was available, range from $135 to $200 per square foot. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 F-5 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Given this information, the building value of prime facilities is estimated at $210 per square foot and support buildings at $50 per square foot. This results in a weighted average value of $167 per square foot for all buildings, which is within the range of other jurisdiction. It is also almost the same figure as that used in the 2005 study ($169 per square foot) and approximately 25 percent lower than the figure used in the 2007 study ($226 per square foot). Table F-4 Value of Public Buildings Source l' . _ Future Planned Facilities(1).:/'''' l 111 .; Year N/A Building Cost per Square Foot $200 Insurance Values of Existing Buildings (prime)1z) ,` _2013 $210 Insurance Values of Existing Buildings (support)131( `. 2013 ", $46 Recent Public Building Construction in Other Florida Counties(4) 2010-2012` -`•. $135 - $200 Used in the Study-- Prime Buildings > 2013 � $210 Used in the Study -- Support Buildings` : ; ' 2013 s $50 Source. Indian River County Capital Improvement Plan - Source: Indian River County, includes buildings for which information was available Source. Indian River County, includes buildings`for which information was available Source: Recent impact fee studies, represents weighted average of prime and support buildings Libraries The most recent libraryconstruction in Indian,River County was completed in 2009 for a building cost -of $263 per'square'fobt. The''current average insurance value of existing librariesi $206 per'square'foot, which -tends -.to'represent a conservative estimate. Finally, recent library construction, in otherFlorida jurisdictions provided an average building cost of $245 per square foot. Given this information, a building value of $240 per square foot is used in the library impact fee' calculations. This figure is almost same as that used in the 2005 study ($`242"per square foot) and represents a decrease of approximately 20 percent from the 2007 study ($296 per square foot). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 F-6 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-5 Library Building Value Source Year 2009 Building Cost per Square Foot $263 Construction of Brackett Library1�1 Insurance Values of Existing Libraries(2) 2013 $206 Recent Library Construction in Other Florida Counties(3) 2010-2012 $245 Used in the Study 2013 $240 (1) Source. Indian River County (2) Source Indian River County (3) Source. Recent impact fee studies Parks & Recreation Facilities The parks and recreation facilities impact. fee inventory includes several recreational facilities. The value of these facilities is based;on, insurance values, information from other jurisdictions and discussions with the County staff:', Solid Waste Facilities The solid waste impact fee inventory includes several customer care centers. Due to the limited information on these:facilities, the value is=based on the' recent reconstruction and expansion of Oslo'GonvenienceCenter at a cost of -=$2.6 million. Land Values For each impact fee program area, land valueswere determined based on the following analysis, as data available: • Recent land purchases f or the related infrastructure (if any); • Value of current parcels as reported by the Indian River County Property Appraiser; • Value of vacant land,by size and by land use; and • Vacant land sales over the past three years by size and by land use. It should be noted that the land value and sales analysis suggested that sales data indicates higher values than estimates included in the Property Appraiser's database for those vacant properties that have not been sold for a while. This may be due to a lag in the update of land values. The following paragraphs summarize the data used for each program area. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County F-7 Impact Fee Update Study January 2014 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-7 Land Value Analysis - Law Enforcement Facilities Variable (1) Value of Current Parcels Year 2013 Average Land t Value per Acre $50,702 Cost of Recent Land Purchases12l 2011 $355,104 Value of Vacant Land: West IRC - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $12,855 - 6 t 15 acres 2013`:.' ., $18,105 WestIRC - All Land Uses -:; - 4 to 6 acres ;' 2013 , - --`., $15,727 -6to15acres 4Y-,2613 `' ;;x$24,376 Unincorporated - Residential / ;,- , -4to6acres .' ' 2013 $18;754 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 -: $2044 ., Unincorporated - All Land Uses , �-, / -4to6acres 2013 - $23,844 - 6 to 15 acres `: - 2013 ', $29,338 Vacant Land Sales: 'j_ ,� , West IRC -Residential ' _ ' -,.,, r - 4to 6 acres ,-._; - 2010=2012, J$43,238 - 6to'15 acres • 2010-2012 • $59,271 West IRC -.All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres, . 1-- "2010-2012 $51,252 :--6to15 acres - "'� ' , 2010-2012 $56,403 Unincorporated• -;Residential ,. ,'' - 4 to 6'acres 1 ' : ". _ 2010-2012 $42,614 - 6 to 15 acres\, ' '`; 2010-2012 $62,617 - Unincorporated 'All Land -Uses •-:- .to 6 acres '; \ 2010-2012 $50,480 --6 to -15 acres, 2010-2012 $66,238 Used in the Study 2013 $50,000 (1) Source Iridian River County Property Appraiser Database (2) Source: Indian River County Sheriff's Office, the parcel included structures Emergency Services Typically, fire stations need to be located at or near major intersections and not in residential areas, for better access and minimum disturbance. As such, land value of these facilities tends to be higher. This can be seen in the current land value of existing fire stations at $102,000 per acre with a range of $16,000 per acre to $171,000 per acre. The Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County F-11 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study County purchased land for Station 13 in 2010 at a cost of $121,000 per acre. This information along with relevant vacant land value and sales information are summarized in Table F-8. CIM Table F-8 Land Value Anal sis - Emer enc Services Facilities • Vaha |~n) Value of Current Parcels - Year I013`. Average Value Land per $101802 Cost of Recent Land Purchases(2) /. 2616 $170517 Value of Vacant Land: ~/. ''�� ._ N/estIRC 'Res�en�o/ �^+'�' ~`` `\. '4to6acres '' ,, 2018 ` >� $17855 '6to1Sacres •/' 2013 �� 105 West IRC 8 ALondUses `� �' `' �N - 4 to 6 acres \ ~� ~ (d8 $} ,~27, '6to1Sacres '_''. \:;,:,-.' �`-3 ���~6;:` .,` [nuntym/�/e'Res��en�o/ ' � - ' \. '4to6acres � ''``,� � � �2013 $21884 '6to1Sacres _ ^` .-`� 26i3\, $24620 Countywide:- Ali-LandUses` ',„ �'�� `'.` 4to6ati7es' —``� -. \ �� ,'' _. -'.:2018 '' $26741 . '6to1Saeres -,-' , 2013 $33543 Vacant Land ' s: / / -N/��s��� West -IRC- �-'. .~ ` .,. � `. ` '�4�6��s ` ' '` �„.'-) 2010-2012 $43,238 'Gto1S� "e` \` �` �� � 2010'2012 $59271 � ` ',West IRC A�londUses'". /_, `';4to6acres ^\ ^s' ,- 2010'I012 $51252 ��'1Sacres ��\ ,. � 2010'2012 $56403 ` [ouhty�ide'Residential '4to`aces .�',:-/ 2010'2012 $42109 '6to1Sa`� `— // 2010'I812 $61,063 Countywide ' kand Uses 4to6acres I010'201I $49868 '6to1Sacres 2818'2012 $63,042 ` Used in the Study 2013 $60,000 (1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Datbase (2) Source: Indian River County; Represents land purchase for Station 13, made in 2010 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County F12 Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Given this information, the high end of vacant land sales ($60,000 per acre) is used for the value of land for emergency services impact fee calculations. This figure is lower than the value of land where existing stations are located and represents a 30 -percent decrease from the 2005 study and a 60 -percent decrease from the 2007 study. Public Buildings Public buildings include a range of facilities from County offices and courthouses that need to be in central locations to maintenance facilities that have more flexibility in location. Given that the County has not bought any land for public buildings recently and programmed capital expansions will take place on existrng\land, the land value of parcels where the existing buildings are located is evaluated,, which' averaged $89,615. This value is used in the impact fee calculations, and repreents'a decrease of 12,percent from the 2005 study and 50 percent decrease from the 2007:study. Libraries As presented in Table F-9, the current value of land where existing libraries are located averages $38,000, with a range of $15;000_per acre to $330,000 per acre. This information along with the vacant sales values of 4,to_6-acreparcels suggests that an average land value of $50,000 per acre is -a. reasonable estimate. This -figure: is50 percent lower than that used in the 2005 study and:75 percent -lower than the 2007 study, Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County F-13 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-9 Land Value Anal sis - Libraries - Variable")Year Value of Current Parcels - 2013 — Average Value - - Land per Acre $38,929 Value of Vacant Land: West IRC Residential '4to6acres 2013 $12,855 West IRC - AliLand Uses 4to6acres 2013' / $15,727 Countywide - Residential ./- i-‘,-'|' 4to6acres. '' 2013' - ' $21,884 Countywide ' All Land Uses /' /` \ '4�o6acne� //.�`� ZO1] � ��26741 Vacant Land Sales: (. ''7 ~\` West IRC - Residential ::'^^� _ ' 4to6acres '^.` ^" .u/�~zv��' �4� ' - _��o',_ West IRC ' All Land »'^.' `~`` ` �/� -",\; - 4 to 6 acres ,' "}` ' $51252 Countywide - Residen'`: .` .~ - 4 to 6 acres �2-^'I010'2012 $42109 Countywide ' All rand Uses \'-, '' �`' '^ '4tn6a�res `�` '': • '� 0—` .2010L2012 $49868 Used|nthStudy � ' � '` 2013 8U - Source: Indian Riye' County Property APpriserDat base ' `— - "'° -'' `^� '`' ` Parks `.`,�.\ ` ` ���'|ndian County'sparks-inventory ,includes parce |s ranging from 0.3 acres to 140 acres. As such, a 'thor,e detailed landlwalue anqlysis was conducted, as shown in Table F-10. The �` `,- x value of curresnt inventory aver6ges $31,000 per acre. Given that the land values and sales for different acreagegrouping range from $17,000 per acre to $100,000 per acre, an average value of $S[\OUO Per acre is found to be a reasonable estimate for impact fee calculation purposes. This''epresentsa 45 percent increase from the 2005 study and a 10 percent decrease from the 2007 study. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 F-14 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-10 Land Value Analysis - Parks Acreage 0.5 to 4 acres 2013 PA Just Values per Acre __(Residential)(') West IRC —;r Unincorporated $29,474 $94,797 4 to 6 acres $12,855 $18,754 6 to 15 acres $18,105 $20,824 15 to 25 acres $21,353 .,,---'s $22,985 20 to 60 acres $18,612 $17,334 40 to 130 acres $19;851. ,, $18,754 Acreage 0.5 to 4 acres ( 2013 Sales per Acre (Residential)(') West IRC Ir Unincorporated _ ,-'/$100,046 . $147,086 4to6acres ,,, ,, $43,238 :$212,614 6 to 15 acres `. -..$59,27,1 "`:, $62,617, 15 to 25 acres ,$95,;109 _ $84,919 20to60acres ', $74,877 $64,131 40 to 130 acres \ $47,197 $41,018 Used in the Study $50,000 (1) Sourcelnd ari River County Property AppraiserDatabase' Solid Waste The inventory of solid waste facilities`includes`only the customer convenience centers used by residential land uses. These facilities are typically built on previous landfills. Given the unique_ nature of these :facilities the current.value of parcels where existing centers are located-isiused in the study, which'av_eraged $20,000 per acre. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County F-15 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study . • -;..„ • ,N1 AliPqrlcii)C Master Fee Schedules '.. . • l \ \ . - ''.-, • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table G-1 Master Fee Schedule - Full Fee • ITC LUC ILand Use f wit Il - - Conection4I F' I'I s _ I Current j, ealculm0d -" ---' _ Solid Wash P1560, , Current �• ealculaled 11 % Pubic buildings _, Cu„enTlTCalculaled 1r , l 0 ies - _ current it C Iculated it Cmwgenry 50rvica -. - - -- Current 1 eahulatod Jr -- RESIDENTIAL. Single Family Detached 210 - Less than 1,500 s f du $155 5267 72.794 $77 $144 87'2% $218 $689 267.3% $491 $651 47.7% 5253 $318 11.5% • 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 5174 71.1% $77 5164 07.5% 5229 5832 263.894 $537 5785 46.194 5318 11.5% - 2,50054 or larger du5323 5189 5323 71.194 577 5160 107.594 5229 5832 263.894$285 5537 5391 33.7% 5309 $180 220 Mulh•Family/Accessory Unit du $103 $160 56.4% $5fl $79 3fi.0% 5129 $413 233.3% $292 5391 33.7% $180 $180 -10.0% -0.5% 240 Mobile Home/RV (tied down) du $126 5187 48.4% $77 $93 21.0% $153 $482 215.794 5358 $457 27.914 $187 $202 8.4% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP, - 310 Hotel r0001 5101 5124 22.3% $22 50 .100.0% 5235 $320 36.3% n/a n/a n/a 5164 5134 .24.5% 320 Moth room 5101 5115 12.994 522 50 -1000% $320 $453 41.6% n/a n/a n/a $176 5124 -27.7% 620 Nursing Home bed $110 5176 60.1% 564 50 -100.0% $320 5453 41.6% n/a n/a n/a 5176 $390 7.7% 252 Assisted Care living Facility (ACV) bed $110 $176 60.1% 564 50 -100.0% $320 5453 41.6% n/a n/a n/a $176 $190 7.7% OFFICE& FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 s f or less 1,0000/ $191 5218 14.1% 5121 50 -100.0% $ 1 307 $561 -57.1% n/a n/a n/a $306 $235 -23.2% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf $191 5317 66.2% 5121 $0 -100.0% $1,307 $817 -37.596 n/a n/a n/a $306 5343 11.894 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000 sf $217 $426 95.9% 5121 r '• $0 100.016 $1,490 $1,097 -264% n/a n/a n/a 5350 $460 31.616 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 sf $178 $435 144.0% $121$0 -100.0%422 51,221 $5 -4.3% n/a n/a n/a 5287 $200 18.2%Office760 710 General Oce 1,00041 5157 $191 21.7% $96 Ir " 50 -100.0% $ 0418 -26.5% n/a n/a n/a $133 $175 -31.6% Research & Development Center 1,0001( 583 $162 95.4% $96 50 -100.0% $569 $ 569 0418 -26.514 n/a n/a n/a $133 5175 31.694 INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf $56 595 69.3% $242 $0 r -100.0% 5384 5246 -563% n/a n/a n/a 570 5103 141% 150 Warehousing 1,000 s/ 543 553 39.694 548 50 '. 1000% $41 5138 28.0% n/a n/a n/a 570 $SB -17.1% 151 Mlnl-Warehouse 1,0001/ $8 511 396% $19 50 `: -100.0% $ $41 530 -28.0% n/a n/a n/a 123 512 -5.7% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf $77 $132 71.3% $247 '-100.0% 5525 $763 -351% n/a n/a n/a 5123 $320 17.794 n/a- Concrete Plant r0$0 $169 5296 74.9% $218 $0 -100.0% $1,158 5763 -34.1% n/a n/a n/a 5272 5320 17.794 n/a Sand Mining acre 522 538 77.394 5218 50 -100.094 , 5149 $98 -33.8% n/a n/a n/a 535 541 18.294 RETAIL. 820 Retail 1,000 sfgla 5320 5452 415% $242 50 -1000% '1 11,51,569 $1,166 -25.7% n/a n/a n/a $311 5489 -6.94 942/946 Gasolinr(ServicO Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos $193 5365 89.2% $40 $0 -100.0% ' $944 $940 -0.4% n/a n/a n/a 5311 5394 26.994 841 New/Used Au10 Sales 1,000 s/ 5191 5281 47.7% $121 50 -100.0% $936 $723 •22.7% n/a n/a n/a $308 $303 -1.4% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sf $821 51,294 • 57.6% $338 50 -100.0% $4,021 53,336 .17.0% n/a n/a n/a $1,321 51,399 5.9% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 1,0005/ $885 $1,699 92.1% $338 50 -100.094 54,333 54,380 1.1% n/a n/a n/a $ 366 $ 23 15.6% 850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 5778 $391 ' 77 0% $$21 50 -100.0% $ $ -9 4% n/a n/a n/a 5366 $313 $4 85.2% 942 4000101311e Repair/Body Shop 1,000 44 $72 - $28fi 299.1% $21 50 -1000% $137 $137 $738 $738 437.4% n/a n/a n/a $110 $310 182.2% 947 S01f.Service Car Wash service bay $211 5166 -213% -$79 50 -100.0% $1,034 5428 58.6% n/a n/a n/a 5340 $180 -47.2% 853 Convenience Markel with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf $475 '.' 51,113 134.5% $435 $0 -1020% $2,327 52,869 23.314 n/a n/a n/a $765 $1,203 57.394 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf $36 $44 22.4% $242 50 -100.016 $174 $113 -35.0% n/a nL n/a $57 547 -17.3% RECREATIONAL: • 430 Golf Course hole $274 $206 -24.7% 539 50 -100.094 $1,340 5531 -60.3% n/a n/a n/a 5440 $223 -49.3% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,0001/ 5265 • 5590 122.2% $121 50 -100.0% $1,302 $1,521 16.8% n/7 n/a n/a 5427 $638 49.2% 412 County Park$17 $38 119.0% $87 50 -100.0% $55 22.2% n/a n/2 n/a 418 541 55.9% 491 Tennis Court oourt273 $517 $536 132.694 $46 50 -100.0% $1,584 $1,594 11.2% n/a n/a n/a $918 $652 55.9% 420 Marina boat berth 517 536 108.1% $46 50 -100.0% 584 $95 11.2% . n/a n/a n/a 528 $39 41.7% GOVERNMENTAL. 732 Post Office 70001/ 5199 $309 555% $96 $0 -100.0% $942 $866 .29.7% n/a n/a n/a $310 $364 7.3% 590 library 1,000 sf $193 $336 74.3% $96 $0 -100.0% 5942 5866 .0 -e.l% n/a n/a n/a 5310 5363 17.3% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf $152 $265 +74.9% $96 $0 -1000% n/a n/a n/a n/a 0/2 n/a $244 5287 17.6% 571 Jail het n/a n/a ' n/a 516 50 -100.016 5478 5684 43.2% n/a n/a n/a $157 5180 14.5% MISCELLANEOUS: - - 565 Day Care Center 1,000 s1 5113 5170 507% 5242 50 -1000% $854 $674 .21.5% n/a n/a n/a 5181 5184 0.3% 610 Hospital 1,0001/ $175 5262 49.2% 50 -100.0% $254 $650 -20.3% n/a n/a n/a $294 5283 8.2% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 s/181 5182 $485 1658% $121 50 -1000% 51,254 $1,250 -0.3% n/a. n/a n/a $294 5524 78.7% 560 Church 7,0000/ $59 $97 63.814 $34 $0 -100.0% 5292 $251 .14,194 n/a n/a n/a 596 5105 9.2% 444 Movie Theaterw/Matine0 screen $948 $1,142 20,4% 5121 50 .1000% $4,648 52,943 -36.796 n/a n/, n/a 51,527 $1,234 -19.2% 520 Elementary School (Private, 0.5) student $10 511 11.7% $12 50 -100.016 572 530 58.916 n/a n/a n/a 517 512 .29094 577 Middle School (Private, 6.9) student $10 $13 30.4% $12 $0 -100.0% $72 534 52 0% n/a n/a n/a $17 $14 -17.7% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 513 515 14 6% $13 50 -100.094 592 $39 .57.3% n/a n/a 522 $21 -.8% 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student $11 519 69.2% $13n/a 50 -100.0% $80 $49 -384% n/a n/a n/a -� 518 01 11.8% n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf $71 $120 70% ,0 596 $0 100.0% 5347 0310 -10.8% n/a n/a n/a /a $21 /a n/a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 G-1 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study atLuc Land Use 210 220 240 310 320 620 252 RESIDENTIAL . Table G-1 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Full Fee Law Enforcement Educational facilities _ Parks & Recreation Transportation 1n6lcul4ted11- Current ii-ETicblated Current IF -Calculated -11 % Current 11 -Calculated 11 Single Family Detached - less than 1,500.1 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf 2,500 sl or larger du du du $223 $251 $272 5402 $435 $486 79.8% 73.4% 51,800 $1,800 $1,800 n/a n/a n/a n/a $1,334 _51,499 $1,790 $1,944 34.1% 29.6% 53,048 $4,595 $3,491 54 354 14.5% • 30131 (411 Fees)_ _ Current 1 C4lcula1ed" 11- % 57,519 $9,388 59,517 510,742 26.6% 14.4% Multi-Family/Accessory Unit Mobile Home/RV (Ned down) TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: - Hotel Motel Nursing Home Assisted Care Uving Facility (ACLF) CISME & FINANC04L. du du MOT bed tied _$152 $162 $144 5144 $155 $155 5250 $250 5183 $169 $258 $258 78.9% 64.8% 50490 27290 17.5% 67 0% 67.0% 5513 5639 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nit n/a n/a 51,626 $906 5966 n/a n/a n/a $2,167 $1,113 $1,113 n/a n/a n/a 0/4 33 2% 22.9% 15.3% n/a n/a n/a n/a 55,157 $2,489 $1,789 52,874 51,554 5443 5636 55,129 52,811 51,589 $2,210 51,562 5506 5569 -0.5% 12.9% -11.2% -23.1% 0.5% 14.2% -10.5% $10,195 $4,817 $4,455 53,539 $2,219 51,237 51,460 $12,035 55,910 55,013 $2,971 $2,264 51,583 $1,646 18.1% 22.7% 12.5% -16.1% 2.0% 27.9% 12.7% 720 911 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf oriess Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000 sf 1 000 sf 1,000 sf $269 $269 $306 5320 $466 5626 19.2% 73.6% n/a n/a n/a, n/a ' • n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nia $13,746 513,746 59,842 14,346 -28.4% 4.4% 515,940 515,940 $11,176 $16,289 -29.9% 2.2% 912 710 760 140 150 151 Bank/Savings Driveen General Office Research & Development Center INDUSTRL41, Manufacturing Warehousing Mini -Warehouse 1,000 sf 1,0008! 1,00088 1,00011 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 5251 5221 $117 579 $60 512 $640 5281 $239 $140 579 517 104.4% 155 0% 26.9% 104.3% 78 0% 30.1% n/a n/a n/a n/a . f ' 10/a 1 n/a \ n/a 019, n/a n/3 n/a n/a n/a n/a .1' n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/9 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 510,900 513,346 _$3,893 52,868 51,351 $1,259 520 774 -1.2% $13,385 513,384 0.0% $14,166 54,363, 53,243 51,510 $1,406 6.1% 12.1% 13.1% 11.8% 11.7% $15,404 55,696 53,866 52,203 $1,776 516,834 $5,533 $4,238 52,095 $1,734 9.3% -2.9% 9.6% -4.9% -2.4% 110 n/a n/a General liftht Industrial Concrete Plant Sand Mining RETAIL. 1,00018 acre! 5108 5238 $31 5194 $435 556 37.0% 80.1% 83.1% 82.7% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nL9, 'ilia //2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 5884 $2,464 55,517 5707 5495 59,708 5$,213 $1,052 '44090 11.5% 48.9%, 48.8% 820 944/ 946 841 932 934 850 942 947 853 890 430 492 412 491 420 732 590 Retail Gasoline/Service Station 01115 01 w/o Car Wash New/Used Auto Sales Restaurant Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru Supermarket Automobile Repair/Body Shop Self-Serwce Car Wash Convenience Market with Gas Pumps Furniture Store RECREADONAL Golf Course Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio County Park Tennis Court Marina GOVERNMENTAL. Post Office library 1,000 sfgla fuel pos. 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 1.00088 service bay 1,000 sf 1.00088 hole 1,000 sf aCte court boat berth 1,000 sf 1,000 sf $452 5272 $270 51,157 $1,247 $371 5117 $298 $669 $50 5385 $375 524 $366 525 $280 $272 $666 $537 5413 $1,905 52,500 5576 5421 5244 $1,638 $65 5303 $868 556 5888 553 5455 5494 47.3% 97.5% 53.2% 64.6% 100 4% 79.5% 260.6% -18 1% 1- 144.7% 28.6% -21.3% 131.4% 138.3% 142.6% 117.0% 62.6% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nia n/a n/a nia n/a n/0. n/a n/a n/a rqa n/a nLa n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a ^1R, n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 11 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a, 0/4 n/a nL2_ n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nLo n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nla n/a n/a n/a 53,242 55,727 10,361 522,706 535,651 . 511,458 58,026 $14,954 $26,066 51,407 $11,529 511,095 $736 512,485 5997 $14,554 56,519 5,209 _$8,501 $21,159 546,601 59,261 56,682 55,032 $23,833 $1,401 $17,953 $13,291 5880 515,617 $1,490 516,254 101.1% -9.0% -18.0% .6.8% 30.7% -19.2% -16.7% -66.4% -8.6% .0090 55.7% 19.8% 19.6% 25.1% 49490 11.7% 5978 53,538 57,572 51,161 56,341 57,486 $12,186 530,365 543,878 513,921 58,482 $16,917 530,736 $1,967 $14,006 $13,586 5975 514,819 51,197 516,584 5565 $3,555 510,027 51,286 $9,292 57,444 $10,221 $29,093 557,016 $11,660 58,437 $6,050 530,655 $1,670 $19,217 $16,907 51,114 519,315 51,712 $18,150 -42.2% 0.5% 32490 - 10.8% 06690 -0.6% -16.1% -4.2% 29.9% -16.2% -0.5% -64.2% -0.3% -15.1% 37.2% 24490 14.3% 30390 43.1% 9490 733 571 Government Office Complex Jail MISCELLANEOUS: 1,000 sf $214 $137 5390 5244 82.0% 82.3% 77.9% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 518,373 $9,873 5399 $26,678 $11,029 $2,162 45.2% 11.7% 441.9% $20,185 510,579 $1,187 528,738 $11,972 53,270 42.4% 13290 175.4% 565 Day Care Cwster 1,000.8 5159 5250 57.4% 610 Hospital 1,00018 5247 $385 55.8% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,00018 5257 5714 177.3% 560 Church 1,000.! 584 $143 70.4% 444 Moyle Theater w/Mati nee 520 Elementary School (Private, 6.5) 577 Middle School (Private, 6-9) 530 High School (Private, 9-12) 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) SCreen $1,338 51,680 25.6% student 514 517 17.4% student $14 $20 37090 student 518 522 21.8% student $16 $78 71390 n/a Fire Stati on 1,0008! 599 5177 78.0% (1) This includes the "current" fee for Educational Facilities n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0/0 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nA n/a n/a n/a nI4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a, n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a "19, n/a n/a 59,068 58,159 -10.090 $5,442 $5,690 4.690 03,599 515,858 340.690 57,653 $2,628 -0.990 523,312 516,162 -30.7% 5153 5373 143.890 5153 5514 235.990 $551 5540 -2.090 $669 51,010 51.090 01,008 5739 -26.790 510,537 59201 -12.790 57,090 57,293 2.990 _55,707 518,830 229990 $3,219 53,225 0190 531,894 523,160 .27090 5279 $443 58.8% 5279 5596 113.590 3710 $634 -10.790 5808 $1,127 39.490 51,622 51,346 -17.090 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 G-2 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Table G-2 Master Fee Schedule -Affordable Growth Fee • Correctional F ulities IR LUC land Use i. Unit l Current -rAtl. Growth -11- % II RESIDENTIAL: _ _ _ Solid Wasle FacllUes .. Current I All. Growth1 % ..___ _. Publi Buildings _ .. ._ _ Current it GrowthI % Aft libraries _. Current l'_Att. Growth it % = Emergency Services Current jr- Alf. Growt1�-%�- Single Family Detached 210 -Less Than 1,500 sf du $155 $0 -100.0% 577 $0 -100.0% $188 $689 267.3% $ 441 $625 41.8% 5253 532 -87.2% 1,500 to 7,499 sf du 5174 50 -100,068 $77 50 -1000% 5211 $748 254.268 $495 $680 37.4% $285 535 -877% - 2,500 sl or larger du $189 50 -100.0% $77 50 -1000% $124 5832 233.3% 5537 5753 78.4% $180 539 -89.3% 720 Multi•FamHy/Accessory Unit du 5103 50 -100D% 558 $0 -1000% 5124 5482 215.768 5358 $439 22.8% 5187 522 -891% 240 Mobile Home/RV(tied down) du 5126 $0 -1000% 5 77 50 -1000% 1153 1582 215.7% $358 5439 72.868 $187 521 -88.1% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room $101 $0 -1000% 522 50 -100.0% • $235 $166 .29.1% n/a n/a n/a $164 50 -1000% 370 Motelroom 5101 50 -100,068 522 50 -1 00.0% $320 1235 -26.4% n/a n/a n/a $176 50 -1000% 620 Nursing Home bed 5110 $0 -1000% $34 50 -100.0% 5320 $235 -26.4% n/a n/a n/a 5176 50 -1000% 252 Assisted Care Uving Facility (AMY) bed $110 50 -100.0% $64 50 .100.0% $320 $235 •264% n/a n/a n/a $176 50 -100.0% OFFICE& FINANCIAL. 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf $191 $0 -100.0% $121 50 .-100.0% $1,307 $292 -77.7% n/a n/a n/a 5306 50 100.0% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1 000 s1 $191 50 -100.0% $121 50 i1 -1000% $1,307 5415 -67.5% n/a n/a n/a 5306 $0 -1000% 911 Bank/Savings Wa I k•In 1,000 sf 5217 $0 -1000% $121 .II $0 -100.0% $1,490 $571 -61.7% n/a 0/5 n/a $287 50 •1000% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 sf 5178 50 -1000% $121 I $0 -1000% x$1,211 $583 -52.2% n/a n/a n/a $287 50 -1000% 710 General Office 1,000 sf 5157 $0 .1000% $96 cI II II $0 -100.0% 51',076 -61.8% n/a n/a n/a $133 50 -1000% 760 Research 0 Development Center 1,000 sf $83$217 50 -100.0% 596 IlII$0 -100.0% $569 $21] -61.8% n/a n/a n/a $133 50 -1000% INDUSTRIAL. 140 Manufacturing 1,000,6 556 $0 -100.0% $242 50 -100.0% $384 $128 .66.7% n/a n/a n/a $90 50 •1000% 150 Warehousing 1,000 sf $43 50 -100,0% $48 50 ' -100.0% 1$41 $15 -62.6% n/a n/a n/a $73 50 -100.0% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000 sf 58 $0 -1000% $19 50 -100,0% $41 $15 -626% n/a n/a n/a $13 -1000% 110 General tight Industrial 1,000 sf $77 $0 -100.0% $242 $0 '•1000%50 5177 -65.8% n/a n/a n/a 5123 50 -100.0% n/a Concrete Plant are 5169 $0 -1000%$158 5218 50 100.0% $$149 $351 -65 6% n/a n/a n/a 35 $$35 50 -100.0% n/a Sand Mining acre $21 $0 •100.0% 5218 $0 -1000% $149 151 -65.6% n/a n/a n/a $0 •7000% RETAIL.$ 820 Retail 1,000 sfgla 5320 50 -100.0% $242 50 -100.0% \'Ifi $1,569 5606 -61.4% n/a n[a n/a 5516 $0 -1000% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. $193 $0 -100.0% 540 ' $0 -100.0% l'-- $944 $489 -48.2% n/a n/a n/a 5311 50 -100.0% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 5191 50 -100.0% $121 , • 50 -100.0% 5936 $376 -59.8% n/a n/a n/a $308 $0 -100.0% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sf $821 50 -1000% $338 $0 100.0% 51,735 •47.4% n/a n/a n/a 51,321 50 .1000% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Dr we-Thru 1,000 sf$4,333 $885 50 -100.0% 5338 50 -1000% $4,333 $2,277 -47.4% n/a n/a n/a $1,525 50 -100.0% 850 Supermarket 1,000 sf $228 $0 -100.0% c 5435 50 -100.0% 51,119 5525 -52.9% n/a nfa n/a $366 $0 -100,0% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf $72 50 -100 0% $21 $0 -100.0% $137 5384 179.4% n/a n/a n/a 5110 $0 -100.0% 947 Self.Service Car Wash service bay 5211 $0 . -100.0% 579 $0 -1000% 51,034 $223 -78.5% n/a n/a n/a 5340 50 •1000% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 5475 50 •-100,0% 5435 $0 -100.0% $2,327 $1,492 -35.9% n/a n/a n/a $$57 50 -100.0% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 536 50 -1000% 5242 $0 -100.0% $174 559 -66.2% n/a n/a n/a $57 $0 -100.0% RECREATIONAL. 430 Golf Course hole 5274 $0 -1000% $39 50 -1000% 51,340 _$276 -79.4% n/a Oa n/a $440 50 -100A% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf $265 50 .1000% $121 50 -1000% $1,302 $791 -39.3% n/a n/a n/a $427 $0 -1000% 412 County Park acre 517 50 -100.0% $87 50 -1000% 809 .36.4% n/a n/a n/a 418 50 •1000% 491 Tennis Court court273 $259 10 -100.0% 518 50 -100.0% $1,171 $809 •36.468 n/a n/a n/a 1128 50 -100.0% 420 Marina boat berth $17 $0 -100.0% $46 50 -100,0% $84 $49 52.1% n/a n/a n/a $28 f0 -100.0% GOVERNMENTAL. 732 Post Office 1,00056 5199 50 -100,0% 596 50 -100.0% $942 $450 -52.2% n/a n/a n/a 5320 50 -100.0% 590 Library 1,000 sf $193 � •100.0% 596 50 -100.0% 5942 $450 -52.2% n/a n/a n/a $310 50 •7000% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf 5152 50 -100.0% $96 $0 -1000% 078 n/a n/a n/a n/a $157 $0 -100.0% 571 Jail bed n/a n/a n/a $16 50 -100.0% $578 5356 .5% •25.5% n/a n/a n/a $157 $0 -1000% MISCELLANEOUS: .. , 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 5113 $0 .100.0% $242 50 -100.0% 5774 5228 -502%' n/a n/a $282 50 -100,0% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf $175 $0 -100.0% 585 $0 -100,0% $859 $351 -59.2% n/a /a n/a n/a $282 50 -1000% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf $182 $0 -100.0% $121 50 -100,0% 51,254 $130 -55.3% n/a n/a 5294$ $0 -1000% 560 Church 1,0005( $59 $0 -100,0% 121 $0 -100.0% 5292 $530 -67.1% /a n/a n/a 527 50 -100.0% 444 Movie Theaterw/Mall nee screen $948 $0 •100,0% 5121 $0 -100.0% $4,648 $1,530 -67.1% n/a n/a n/a $1,527 50 -1000% 520 Elementary School (Private, K.5) student $10 50 -100.0% 512 $0 .1000% $72 $15 -786% n/a n/a n/a $17 50 -100.0% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student $10 $0 -100.0% $12 50 -100,0% $92 $20 -77.8% n/a 6/a n/a $22 50 -1000% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student $13 50 -100.0% $13 $0 •100.0% 592 126 -68'0% n/a n/a n/a $18 50 -100.0% 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student $11 50 -1000% 513 $0 -100.0% $8D $26 -68,0% n/a n/a n/a 1 -1000% n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf 571 $0 -100.0% $96 $0 -100.0% $357 $161 -53.6% n/a n/a n/a n//a1 n//a1 n/a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 G-3 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study DE LUC Land Use RESIDENTIAL. - Single Family Detached 210 270 • LC" than 1,50089 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf • Table G-2 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth Fee • % Current 7411.Growthulll % _ unit _ Law EnfONemenk_ Educational Facilities Parks & Recreation TransportatiOn _ _ _Total (Allies,/ t r il Current Aft Growth -11 % Current TAIL Growth ir % Current 411. 6,0,015 Y. CurrenTAD. Growth -1 du 5223 5402 79.896 $1,800 nA n/a $1,334 51,647 23.4% 3,048 $3,491 14.5% $7,519 58,686 15.5% du $251 5435 73 4% 51 800 n/a ry/a $1,499 51,788 19.3% $4,595 $4,354 5.2% 59,388 $9,841 4.8% -2,500,8 or larger du 5272 5486 78.9% $1,800 n/a n/a $1,626 51,993 22.6% 55,157 $5,129 -0516 510,195 511,032 8.2% Multi.Family/Accessory Unit du $152 $750 64816 $513 n/a n/a _5906 51,074 13.0% 52,489 52811 12.9% $4,817 55 406 12.2% 240 Mobile 90,04/65 11.4 down) TRANSIENT, assesTro, GROWN 4,0 310 Hotel $162 5144 5250 $183 54.4% 27.2% 5639 n/a n/a n/a n/a 5966 51,024 6.1% $1,789 $1,589 .11.2% 54,455 54,445 -0.2% 370 620 252 Motel Nursing Home Assisted Care Living Facility (ACIFI OFFICE & FINANCIAL bed bed $144 $155 $155 5169 5258 $258 17.556 67.096 67016 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $2,874 $994 -65.4% 53,539 51,343 -62.1% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a rt/a n_La nja 51,554 $443, $636 $228 5256 -54.8% -48.5% 59.8% 52,219 $1,237 51 460 $1,025 $722 $750 -53.8% -41616 -48.7% 720 911 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 11 or less Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000 sf 1 000 sf $269 5269 $320 $466 19 2% 73.6% n/a ni- n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 513,746 513,746 54,429 $6,455 .67.8% -53.0% 515,940 515,940, 55,041 57,346 .68.4% .53.916 1 000 sf 5306 5626 104 4% n/a 'n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $10,900 54,848 -55.5% $13,385 56,045 -54.816 912 710 Rank/Savl ngs Drive -In General Office 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 1 000 sf 5251 5640 155.0% n/a n/a n/a nla n/a 513,306 $6,374 -52.2% $15,404 $7,598 -50.7% $221 $281 26.9% n/a . n/a n/a n/a n/a $3,893 51,964 .49.6% 55,696 $2,500 .56.1% 1,000 sf $117 5739 104.3% n/a cia n/a n/a n/a nia $2,868 $1,460 -49.1% $3,866 51,916 .50.4% INDUSIRIAL. 140 150 151 Manufacturing Warehousing Mini -Warehouse 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 st 1 000 sf 579 $60 5140 $79 70016, 30.1% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Fq, "Ja nla 51,351 51,259 5680 $632 -49.756 -49.8% $2,203 $1,776 5948 $783 -57.0% -55.916 1 000 sf 1,000,3 $12 5108 $17 5_194 37.0% 80.1% n/a ^La n/a n/a ,n/a h/a n/a n/a n/a nh nfa $884 52,464 $222 $1,236 -74816 -49.8% $978 5255 -74.0% 53,538 51,607 54.6% n(a Concrete Plant n/a Sand Mining 820 RETAIL. • Retail 944/ 946 841 932 Gasoline/Serwce Station with or w/o Car Wash New/Used Auto Sales Restaurant 934 850 942 947 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive.Thrti Supermarket Automobile Repair/Body Shop Self -Service Car Wash acre 1,000 sfgla fuel pos. 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 1.00018 1,000 sf 1,000 sf $238 531 5452 $272 $270 51,157 51,247 5321 $435 $56 $666 $537 $413 $1,905 $2,500 5576 83.1% 82.7% 47.3% 97.5% 53.2% k 64.6% h 100.4% 79.5% n/a n/a n/a n/a nit n/a n/a 414 nLa n/a '‘ ri/a n/a n/a n/a 55,517 $3,696 -33.016 $7,572. 54,528 -40.2% n/a n/a n/a n/a 5707 5474 '33016 51,161 $581 -50016 n/ n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nja $3,242 $2,934 -9.5% $6,341 54,206 -33.7% " n/a n/a nja n/a cia n/a nJa n/a $5,727 510,361 52,344 53,825 -59.1% -63.1% $7,486 511,186 $3,369 $4,614 55016 .62.1% nja 522,706 59,521 -58.1% 530,365 $13,161 n/a c/ c/a n/a n/a nia 5/4 n/a $35,651 511,458 520,970 54,168 -41.2% -63.6% $43,878 513,921 525,747 55,268 -41.3% -62.2% service bay 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf $117 5798 $669 5421 5244 $1,638 260.6% .18.1% 144.7% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a ^La n/a n/a n/a 58,026 $14,954 $26,066 53,007 -62.5% 58,482 53,812 .55.1% 52 264 510,72$ .04916 516,917, $2,731 .83.9% .58.9% 530,736 513,855 -54.916 890 Furniture Store . RECREATIONAL . 1,000 sf 550 $65 28616 430 Golf Course 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio hole 1,000 sf 5385 5375 5303 • 5868 -21.3% 131.4% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 51,407 $630 -55.2% $1,967 $754 -61.716 n/a nja n/a n/a n/a 511,529 $8,079 -29.9% 514,006 58,658 -38.2% n/a c/a n/a n/a pia n/a $11,095 $5,981 -46 1% 513,586 $7,640 43.8% 412 County Park 491 Tennis Court 420 Marina GOV(RNMENTAL. acre court boat berth $24 $366 $25 $56 5888 $53 138 3% 142.6% 117.016 n/a n/a n/a n/a ^La n/a n/a n/a n/a pla n/a $736 $12,485 5397 57,027_, -46.1% -43.7% $975 5504 -48.3% 514,819 $8,723 41.1% n/a n/a n/a 014 n/a 5997 _$670 .32.8% $1 197 $772 -35.5% 732 Post Office 590 library 1,000 sf 1,000 sf _5280 $272 $455 $494 62.6% ' 02016 n/a nb n/a n/a n/a n/a nja 0/4 n/a 514 554 n/a 518,373 57,314 512,006 -49.7% -34.7% 516 584 58,184 -50.7% 520,185 512,950 '35816 733 Government Office Complex 571 tail MISCELLAN(OUS: 1,000 sf bed $214 5137 5390 5244 82.3% 77 9% 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 5159 5250 57.4% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf $297 $385 55816 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a_ n/a n/a n/a 014 n/a 59,873 54,963, .49.7% 10,579 55,353 Dia nLa n/a nfa 5399 5973 143.9% 51 187 51,573 32.5% 59,068 53,672 -59.516 510,537 54,150 -60.616 n/a n/a n/a 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf $257 5714 177.3% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/ n/a 55,442 $2,560 -53.016 $7,090 53,295 -53.516 ^/a n/a 53,599 57,136 98.316 55,707 58,499 48.916 560 Church 1 000 sf 584 5143 70.416 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a., 444 Movie Theater w/Mati nee SCreen $1,338 51,680 25.6% n/a 520 Elementary School (Private, 1.5) 522 Middle School (Private, 6.9) 530 81191 ,506001 (Private, 9-12) 540/550 Universindlunior College (7,500 or fewer students) student $14 $17 17.416 student 514 $20 37 0% student $18 $22 21.8% student 516 $28 71.3% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a„ n/a 0, n/a /a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9/4 n/a 52,653 51,183 -55.416 57,273 .68.816 $153 5,968 9.716 523,312 nia DA DA $3,219 $1,457 .54.716 531,894 $10,483 .67.1% $279 $200 -28.316 n/a n/a nia $153 $231 51.316 $279 5269 -3.616 n/a n/a n/a oio n/a 5551 $243 -55.916 $669 5454 -32.116 $710 5286 -59.716 5808 5508 -37.216 n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf 599 5177 78.0% (1) This includes the "current" fee for Educational Facilities Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 01,008 5332 -67.016 51,622 $671 .58.716 G-4 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Executive Summary In response to high growth levels and the need to provide infrastructure to support this growth, Indian River County (IRC) implemented a Transportation Impact Fee in 1986. In 2005, the County adopted impact fees in eight more program areas. The technical studies for all program areas were updated in 2007; however, these technical studies were not adopted. Of the nine program areas, only the transportation impact fee was later updated substantially in 2009 by an internally generated County update using data from the 2005 and 2007 studies, resulting in a fee reduction for almosf.aII.the land•uses. The eight non - transportation program fees were slightly modified in' the 2009 update. Since then, the County suspended the collection of five impact fee types to promote construction during the economic downturn, and more recently extended suspension' of correctional facilities, solid waste, and public buildings impact fees: Those three impact:.fee suspensions are currently in effect. Indian River County has retained -Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) to prepare an update study to reflect changes to, the impact fee variables for all program areas. In addition, the direction received from 'the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is to maintain the residential land uses at the' current;leverand•develop a methodology to reduce non-residential impact fees. To address the- goal of` reducing fees' for non-residential land uses, TOA developed the Affordable Growth methodology, which takes. into consideration revenues received from the existing development= that are used toward capacity expansion projects. As population growth. rates decrease,. -the ‘existing development's ability to assist in absorbing new growth's impact while maintaining the level of service (LOS) becomes more possible. The Affordable Growth -.method calculates the necessary impact fee levels to maintain the existing/achieved LOS given- k certain level of non -impact fee funding at an estimated growth rate. It is important to note that whether to fund capacity expansion projects solely with impact fee collections or supplement them with alternative funding sources is largely a policy decision, allowing the County to contribute or limit non -impact fee funding in its service areas as appropriate based on its capital improvement planning goals and the nature of its existing impact fee program. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 ES -1 Impact Fee Update Study • • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established through case law since the 1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the "dual rational nexus" test, which requires that they: • Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to the need created by new development paying the fee; and • Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development, typically accomplished through a list of capacity -adding projects included in the County's Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another planning document/Master Plan. In addition, one of the requirements of the 2006, Florida Impact,Fee,Act is that the studies be based on most recent and localized data, This technical report has been prepared to support legal compliance with existing case law and statutory requirements. Although the Florida courts` have yet to expressly address the methodology underpinning the Affordable;Growth Strategy, this aspect of the report is based on the long-standing legal standards described in this report. The technical report also documents the. methodology components for each �f the impact fee areas, including an " evaluation of the inventory, service area, I,evel-of-service (LOS), cost, credit, and demand components. Information supporting this analysis was obtained from the County and other sources, as -=indicated. The.report includes results for all program areas, with the exception of educational facilities. Because the initial•_results have not yet been reviewed by the Indian River County School-Board;.this section isnot included in this report. Three primary factors affected 'the County's impact fee levels: • Since 2005, the County built additional infrastructure and increased the capital asset inventory significantly'in most program areas. This results in an increased asset value, which in turn, increases the impact fee. • In most infrastructure areas, the County used or is still using other revenue sources to supplement impact fees, such as optional sales tax revenues, ad valorem tax revenues, and other revenues. Depending on the program area and the level of on- going investment, this results in an increase in the credit component for some program areas, which in turn reduces the impact fee. In others, if the investment was made in earlier years and are not projected to continue at the same levels, the Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County January 2014 ES -2 Impact Fee Update Study • • Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study credit may decrease compared to the previous study, which in turn increases the impact fee. • Finally, the demand component is adjusted to reflect the most recent available data, which affects different land uses at different rates. The following table provides a summary of calculated fees for seven representative land uses (the complete schedule has almost 50 land uses). The table includes the following: • Current adopted fee; • Calculated maximum impact fee; • Calculated impact fee using the Affordable'Growth methodology; and • An additional scenario that applies the, necessary discount to ensure that the calculated mid-size single family rate is not above the current' adopted rate. It is important to note that the necessary discount levels -for this scehario;would result in degradation of LOS in the_ case of public buildings, libraries, parks, and law enforcement program areas since'the discount,levels are higher than the calculated maximum discount to maintain ithe level of service -under the Affordable Growth section for each program area. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. January 2014 Indian River County ES -3 Impact Fee Update Study