HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/26/1986Wednesday, March 26, 1986
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission
Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday,
March 26, 1986, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Don C.
Scurlock, Jr., Chairman; Margaret C. Bowman; and William C.
Wodtke, Jr. Absent were Richard N. Bird, who was out of the
county, and Patrick B. Lyons, Vice Chairman, who was ill.
Michael J. Wright, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac,
Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; OMB Director
Joseph Baird; L. S. "Tommy" Thomas, Intergovernmental Relations
Director; and Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order and Administrator
Wright led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Chairman Scurlock requested the addition of the following
items to today's Agenda.
1) Proclamation - National Exchange Club Day.
2) Proclamation - Michael L. Wodtke for community service.
3) As Item K on the Consent Agenda, approval of out-of-state
travel to attend the National Hurricane Conference in
Houston, Texas.
4) As Item L on the Consent Agenda, confirmation of appointment
of John Acor to the Regional Planning Council.
5) Request from the Sheriff's Office to equip Emergency Response
Team.
6) Appointment of Commissioner to Data Processing Committee.
Commissioner Wodtke requested the addition of the City of
Vero Beach's recommendations for City representation on five
various county committees.
a
,
BOOK � F`' CL 98()
1986 BOOK 63 FACE 981
Administrator Wright requested the addition of right-of-way
acquisition agreements for southerly extension of Indian River
Boulevard.
Attorney Vitunac requested the following additions:
1) Acceptance of an electricity easement to Florida Power 8
Light for the new wastewater treatment plant.
2) Amended construction contract for Sandridge Golf Club.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, Commissioners Lyons and Bird
being absent, unanimously (3-0) added the above
items to today's Agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or
corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 26,
1986. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
February 26, 1986, as written.
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or
corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 5,
1986.
Commissioner Bowman wished to clarify the Tri -County
Committee Report on Page 40 by having it read: "The Committee
will meet monthly on the last Thursday of the month in St. Lucie
County, and there will be quarterly meetings of the general
membership of the Tri -County Council of Local Governments."
Chairman Scurlock noted that the minutes of the Wedgewood
Park Development rezoning request refer to a 20 -acre tract in
several places, and that should be corrected to 1110 -acres" to be
consistent throughout pages 10-27.
.11
E
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
March 5, 1986, as corrected.
PROCLAMATION - MICHAEL L. WODTKE
Chairman Scurlock read the following proclamation aloud and
presented it to Michael L. Wodtke.
P R O C L A M•A T I O N
0
WHEREAS, on March 11,• 1966 MICHAEL L. WODTKE was
elected to the City Council of Vero Beach, Florida; and
WHEREAS, MICHAEL L. WODTKE has served on the Indian
River County Board of Zoning Adjustment since February 15, 1973
and shown leadership qualities by serving as Chairman of that
Board several times; and
WHEREAS, MICHAEL L. WODTKE has expressed dedication and
care for his community in many areas by volunteering his time,
energy and expertise to the Indian River County Volunteer
Ambulance Squad, Little League, Volunteer Firemen, and Emergency
Management Department;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board on
behalf of itself expresses gratitude to MICHAEL L. WODTKE for his
record of community service and wishes him a long and successful
future.
Dated this 26th day of March, 1980.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
2nolc 2C4-�
•
�• Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Chairman
ATTEST;
I•'rc da Wright, Clerk
3
R 2 6 11986 BOOK 6 3 F -,AGE 982
MAR 2 6 198i,
PROCLAMATION - "NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB DAY"
BOOK 63 RUM
Chairman Scurlock read the following proclamation aloud and
presented it to John Holmes, President of the Vero Beach Exchange
Club.
P R O C L A M A T I O N
A PROCLAMATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDR, PROCLAIMING MARCH 27, 1986, AS
"NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB DAY"
WHEREAS, seventy-five years ago, on March 27, 1911, a
group of farsighted business and professional men formed the first
Exchange Club for the positive purpose of exchanging ideas and
information and of serving their community through a unified effort;
and
WHEREAS, since that time EXCHANGE has grown to be the
oldest and largest exclusively American service club organization
with nearly 1,200 clubs and 43,000 members .serving the nation
through a multitude of proven and productive community service
programs; and
WHEREAS, the Exchange Clubs of Vero Beach, Indian River,
Sebastian, and Vero Beach West, through their ongoing
participation in many national and local projects, have provided a
-variety of valuable services to this community;
NOW, THEREFORE,- BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
that the Board commends those dedicated citizens who, united under
the banner. of EXCHANGE for the past seventy-five years, have
been making American communities better places in which to live;
AND FURTHER, in appreciationE of all the exceptional
accomplishments of the above-mentioned Exchange Clubs and
• Exchange _ Clubs across America, the Board hereby proclaims that
Thursday. March 27, 1986, be observed as
�_•
."NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB DAY"
to commemorate that day as the 75th anniversary of the birih of
EXCHANGE - A GREAT AMERICAN TRADITION.
DATED this 26th day of March, 1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
.�.By
y'� `!G 7. mon C. Scurlock r.
ri�`•'1;�5:.'. Chairman
4
SHERIFF'S REQUEST TO EQUIP NEWLY FORMED EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
The Board reviewed the following letter dated 3/24/86:
*'[J tr t, f f
P. O. BOX 608
PHONE 869.6700
March 24, 1986
R.T."TIM" DOBECK • INDIAN R-rvER COUNTY
MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
VERO DFACII. FLORIDA 32961
Honorable Doug Scurlock, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Doug:
Please find enclosed the price list of equipment needed to immediate-
ly complete outfitting our Emergency Response Team. Our concept is
to have two (2), five (5) men teams, so that we may have a full com-
pliment of five (5) personnel, at all times, taking into considera-
tion days off, sick time and vacation. Although, the bottom line
seems initially high, the bulk of this equipment will be a one (1)
time purchase.
Since its inception, the Emergency Reasponse Team has been responsi-
ble for the safe apprehension of four (4) barracaded, armed suspects.
We also have utilized this response team on an average of five (5)
times per month since its inception; in searches involving elderly
people, young children, lost boaters on Blue Cypress, the river and
the ocean. And more recently, have utilized this team for the
special arrest purposes for multi -jurisdiction offenders and drug
smuggling surveilance and arrests. Its sole purpose is to prevent
the loss of life and to insure the security for the public at large.
Each item listed is a necessary item. We have gone over each indi-
vidual piece and have asked for only those things necessary to suc-
cessfully complete the program. I urge each of the commissioners to
accept this proposal and hope that a unanimous vote can be reached.
Sincerely,
R. T. "Tim" Dobeck, Sheriff
Indian River County
TOTAL RECAP FOR E.R.T.
Rescue Equipment
E.R.T. Team Equipment
Individual E.R.T. Equipment
Training
GRAND TOTAL
$ 8,129.78
18,030.00
18,520.80
12,964.00
$ 57.644.58
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK 63 Pa1GE 984
L_
RESCUE EQUIPMENT
1. Power Saw
1 - (a) Partner R-1200 complete w/carbide blade 14"
1 - (b) Gas chain saw w/case 16"
2. Extension Ladder 24'
1 - (a) Duo -safety YGE-24 Fiberglass
3. Axe
2 - (a) Pickhead fiberglass handle 57.00 ea.
4. Sledge Hammer
2 - (a) 10 lb. fiberglass handle 39.00 ea.
S. Winch
1 - (a) 3Z842 6000# 12 volt D.C.
6. Bolt Cutters
1 - (a) H.R. Porter 42"
7. Generator
1 - (a) U.S. 3800 Watt
8. Prybar
1 - (a) 5' 1"
9. Shovel
4 - (a) Union LHRP 5.99
10. Ratchett Lever Jack
1 - (a) Simplex #2029 20 Ton
11. Control Units
2 - (a) S-950 Control Units 1,500.00 ea
i
12. Hand Tools
1 - (a) Proto #9975 Tool box
1 - (b) Proto #353 Hacksaw
1 - (c) Proto #9600A Screwdriver Set
1 - (d) Proto #9800A Screwdriver Set
1 - (e) Proto #263G Combination Pliers
1 - (f) Proto #1312P Hammer
1 - (g) Proto #1200F 15 pc. combination wrench set
1 - (h) Proto #5400 -OC 26 pc. socket set
TOTAL
BOOK 63 FnUE 985
S 990.00
249.00
595.00
114.00
78.00
787.04
87.89
1,300.00
29.00
23.96
446.34
3,000.00
25.37
10.46
26.66
28.92
7.45
10.35
162.19
158.15
$8,129.78
E.R.T. TEAM EQUIPMENT
1. 2 - Suppressed $900.00 ea
2. 2 - Remington 700 (308) Rifle, (3x9) scope, rings & mounted,
$635.00
Sling & Swivels, 30.00
Bypod, 39.00
Scope covers, 7.50
711.50 Package ea $695.00
3. 2 - cases for above (metal & lockable) $45.00 ea.
4. 2 - room entry vests with ceramics, $1,050.00 ea.
S. 2 - night vision scope, $4,700.00 ea.
6. 10 - pagers and charger $325.00 ea.
6
$ 1,800.00
1,390.00
90.00
2,100.00
9,400.00
3,250.00
$18.030.00
INDIVIDUAL E.R.T. EQUIPMENT
1.
10
- S & W 3000 (ERT equipped) $298.38 ea.
$ 2,983.80
2.
10 -
Beretta auto pistols, model 92F, $328.50 ea.
3,285.00
3.
10
- Elevated urban holster rig complete, $58.00 ea.
580.00
4.
10
- Leather duty type holster, $23.00 ea.
230.00
5.
20
- Rip -stop cammo suit (pants & shirt), $50.00 ea.
1,000.00
6.
10
- Responder Boots, $55.00 ea.
550.00
7.
20
- Cammo, Black, $50.00 ea.
1,000.00
8.
10
- Web -Belt, $12.00 ea.
120.00
9.
10
- Harness, $16.00 ea.
160.00
10.
10
- Canteen, $1.50 ea.
15.00
11.
10
- Canteen holder, $5.75 ea.
57.50
12.
10
- M-16 ammo pouch (used to hold Walkie) $8.95 ea.
89.50
13.
10
- Individual team vests $400 to $600 ea. depending
on model
chosen
6,000.00
14.
10
- Knives $60.00 ea.
600.00
15.
10
- Gas Masks $135.00 ea.
1,350.00
16.
10
- Vests $50.00 ea.
500.00
Total for 10 = $ 18.520.80
Per Man = $ 1,852.08
Chairman Scurlock noted that he took the liberty of having
Purchasing Manager Carolyn Goodrich take a look at the numbers
submitted by Sheriff Dobeck, and Manager Goodrich feels that
while most of these prices are in line with what the Purchasing
Department could get them for, some are higher. He suggested the
Sheriff's Dept. get together with Purchasing to take advantage of
their lower prices on some of these items.
Roy Raymond, Sheriff's Administrative Assistant, felt it is
extremely important to put the ERT in full effect, especially
7
MAR 2 1986 BOOK 6 3 PkC Q.S1
TRAINING
1.
5 -
new 9MM silver tip, $250.00 per thousand
$-1,250
2.
25
- 9MM practice ammo (44172) $165.00 per thousand
4,125
3.
5
- 308 (Q) 147 grain practice ammo $295.00 per thousand
1,475
4.
5
- 12 ga. 00 buck shot $250.00 per thousand
1,250
5.
2
- Spotting Scopes $246.00 ea.
492
6.
24
- #7 1/2 shot 12 ga. shotgun shells $156.00 per thousand
1,872
7.
Chemical and Miscellaneous Ordance
2,500
TOTAL
$12.964
Chairman Scurlock noted that he took the liberty of having
Purchasing Manager Carolyn Goodrich take a look at the numbers
submitted by Sheriff Dobeck, and Manager Goodrich feels that
while most of these prices are in line with what the Purchasing
Department could get them for, some are higher. He suggested the
Sheriff's Dept. get together with Purchasing to take advantage of
their lower prices on some of these items.
Roy Raymond, Sheriff's Administrative Assistant, felt it is
extremely important to put the ERT in full effect, especially
7
MAR 2 1986 BOOK 6 3 PkC Q.S1
BOOK
during the terrorist threat from the Libya situation.
63 PAGUE9.87 -7
The
equipment will be paid for out of the confiscated fund which is
approaching $200,000,
Chairman Scurlock pointed out that we might have some need
to furnish the new jail facility out of the confiscated funds,
but Mr. Raymond felt that it is questionable whether we will be
able to use confiscated funds for that purpose.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
authorized the expenditure of up to $57,644.58
to equip the Emergency Response Team, with the funding
to come out of the confiscated fund account,
as shown in the following budget transfer.
TO: Honorable Board of County DATE: March 26, 1986 FILE:
Commissioners
SUBJECT: Budget Amendment
From Sheriff's
Confiscated Trust
Fund
FROM: Jose h A. Baird REFERENCES:
OMB Director
Account Number
112-600-586-099.04
112-000-351-020.00
112-600-581-099.91
i
EXPLANATION:
Account 'Name
Budget Transfer -Sheriff
-Increase Decrease
$57,645
Revenue - Confiscated Property 42,000
Reserve for Contingency
$15,645
Money is needed in the amount of $57,644.58 to create an Emergency Response
Team. Funds are to come from Sheriff's confiscated property fund.
JAB/ew
8
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Wodtke requested that Item C be removed from
the Consent Agenda for discussion, and Commissioner Bowman
requested that Item H be removed also.
A. Pistol Permits - Renewals
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/17/86:
rQ: The Honorable Members of DATE: March 17, 1986 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT: Pistol Permit - Renewals
FROM: Michael Wright REFERENCES:
County Administrator
The following individuals have applied thru the Clerk's Office
for renewal of pistol permits:
William E. Bartsch
Ira L. Dean
Wellford E. Hardee
All requirements of the ordinance have been met and are in order.
9
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK 63 F.°-C9S's
BOOK 63 PACE 989
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED
by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved renewal permits to carry a concealed weapon
for the following:
William E. Bartsch
Ira L. Dean
Wellford E. Hardee
B. Pistol Permit - New
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/17/86:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: March 17, 1986 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT: Pistol Permits - New
FROM: Michael Wright REFERENCES:
County Administrator
The following individual has applied thru the Clerk's Office
for pistol permits:
Pamela A. Starckx
All requirements of the ordinance have been met and are in order.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved the issuance of a permit to carry a concealed
weapon to Pamela A. Starckx.
C. Report
The Board reviewed the following report dated 3/12/86
which is on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board:
10
M
A
FREDA WRIGHT
R
CLERK, CIRCUIT COURT AND RECORDER
IN] 1,k]ANT; RIVE Iz Qc
P. O. BOX 1028
VERO BEACH - FLORIDA
32960
MARCH 12, 1986
TOs BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FM: TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU — SPECIAL TRUST FUND
MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1986
FINES
$27,360.08
COURT COSTS
7,839.50
LOCAL LAW
2,410.50
D.L.6
2,480.00
960.20 STATUTE
162.00
BOND ESTREATURE
1,789.01
COPYWORK/MISC. FEES
2,249.50
REFUND 960.20
( 1.00)
REFUND BOND ESTREATURE
(250.00)
REFUND LOCAL LAW
( 4.00)
REFUND FINES
( 30.00)
REFUND COURT COSTS
(303.00)
TOTAL
$43.702.59
FOR YOUR INFORMATION AND COMPARISON,
WE SUBMITTED.THE SUM OF $51,800.88
IN FEBRUARY 1985.
Commissioner Wodtke requested that
the Clerk's Office
provide a total of the fees collected
for the fiscal year to date
compared to the amount collected during the same months of the
last fiscal year.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
accepted the above report.
11
MAR 2 6 1996 BOOK 63 rA E 990
i
ISA 2 C? 1936
D. Report
_I
BOOK
Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk:
Traffic Violation Month to Date Report - February, 1986
Filed by last name
E. Execution of Ingress/Egress_ Easement_ for Sun Bank in
Sebastian
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved the following ingress/egress easement
agreement between Stanley Zaleski and Evelyn Kerr,
Sun Bank/Indian River, and Indian River County, and
authorized the Chairman's signature.
EASEMENT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK THE BOARD
F. Approval of Out -of -County Travel
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved out -of -county travel for Commissioners and
appropriate staff to attend the Policy Studies Clinic
in Tallahassee, April 10-11, 1986.
G.�DER, _Army Corps/DNR Permit Application - City of Vero Beach
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/17/86:
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: March 17, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: D.E.R., ARMY CORPS AND
UBJECT: D.N.R. PERMIT APPLICATION
Obert M. Ke ti g,P
Planning & Development Director
THROUGH: Art Challacombe
Chief, Environmental Planning
TM#86-325
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois REFERENCES: City Vero
Staff Planner (gyp DIS:MISC1
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting on March 26, 1986.
72
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION APPLICATION
NO. 31-117196-4
APPLICANT: City of Vero Beach
P.O. Box 1389
Vero Beach, FL 32961
WATERWAY & LOCATION:
The project is located in the Atlantic Ocean adjacent to
Humiston Beach Park on Ocean Drive in Section 32, Township 32,
Range 40 East, Indian River County, Florida.
WORK & PURPOSE: The applicant, City of Vero Beach, proposes to
restore an existing stormwater outfall that was destroyed by
beach erosion; the outfall is to extend approximately 105 feet
waterward. No dredging or filling is to occur.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS:
The Planning and Development Division reviews and submits
comments on dredge and fill applications to the permitting
agencies based upon the following:
- The Conservation & Coastal Zoning Management Element of
the Indian River Comprehensive Plan
- Coastal Zone Management, Interim Goals, Objectives &
Policies for the Treasure Coast Region
- The Hutchinson Island Planning & Management Plan
- The Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances
The City of Vero Beach is proposing to restore an existing
stormwater outfall located within the City's jurisdiction.
Section 17-4.04(10)(j) of the Florida Administrative Code
indicates that the "repair or replacement of existing pipes to
original configurations for the purpose of discharge of storm -
water runoff" is exempted from D.E.R. permitting requirements.
In that any impacts associated with the project are site-
specific and not within the County's jurisdiction, restoration
of the stormwater outfall has no impact of County significance.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners
authorize staff to forward the following comment regarding this
project to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation:
Indian River County has no objection to the project, in that
any associated impacts are within the City of Vero Beach and
not within County jurisdiction.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved staff recommendation to forward a comment of
no objection to the proposed project.
13
MARR 2 6 1986 BOOK. i.3 P,q 992
BOOK 6 3 F, 931
H. DER/Army Corps/DNR_ Permit_ Application - Mangrove Alteration -
Figgie_ Properties,_ Inc_
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/12/86:
TO. Honorable Members DATE: March 12, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: D.E.R. PERMIT APPLICATION
MANGROVE ALTERATION
SUBJECT:
Robert M. 1(daUJhg,CACP
Planning & Development Director
THROUGH: Art Challacombe
FROM: Chief, EnvironmentalRRENCES:
Roland M. DeBlois TM #86-319
Staff Planner DIS:ROLAND
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of March 26, 1986.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION APPLICATION
NO. 31-117096-4
APPLICANT: Figgie Properties, Inc.
1000 Virginia Center Parkway
Richmond, VA 23295
WATERWAY & LOCATION: The project is located on the shoreline
fringe of the Indian River, adjacent to State Road AIA in
Section 16, Township 33 South, Range 40 East, Indian River
County, Florida.
The upland property associated with the project is Seagrove
West Subdivision, located on State Road AIA, Vero Beach,
Florida.
WORK & PURPOSE: The applicant proposes to alter approximately
50% of existing mangroves on the shoreline fringe of the
subject property for purposes of maintaining a river view for
Seagrove West Subdivision. The alteration is to consist of
trimming and hedging of approximately 500 mangroves. The
applicant proposes to conduct the trimming process in
accordance with the Indian River County Tree Protection
Ordinance mangrove alteration criteria.
14
4
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS:
The Planning and Development Division reviews and submits
comments on dredge and fill applications to the permitting
agencies based upon the following:
The Conservation & Coastal Zoning Management Element of
the Indian River Comprehensive Plan
- Coastal Zone Management, Interim Goals, Objectives &
Policies for the Treasure Coast Region
The Hutchinson Island Planning & Management Plan
The Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances
On February 25, 1986, Staff issued an Indian River County
mangrove alteration permit (MA #86-002) for the proposed
project, in accordance with Section 231, Tree Protection, of
the Indian* River County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Section
23}-9 of the Code specifically lists criteria to be met in
achieving compliance with County regulations; the applicant has
assured Staff that proposed alterations will satisfy those
criteria. In that respect, Staff has no objection to the
issuance of a Department of Environmental Regulation Mangrove
Alteration permit to the applicant for the proposed project.
RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners
authorize staff to forward the following comment regarding this
project to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation:
Indian River County has no objection to the issuance of a
D.E.R. Mangrove Alteration permit for the proposed project, in
that the project as proposed satisfies County Code regulations.
Commissioner Bowman noted that this very large area contains
over 500 mangrove trees and wondered who is going to monitor this
work. She questioned whether taking off the bottom limbs is
allowed under "hedging".
Art Challacombe, Chief of Environmental Planning, advised
that staff will go out and spot check the results of this annual
trimming to see if they are in compliance. Most of the work
involved is trimming dead limbs and bottom branches after the
winter freeze period. The red mangroves got hit very badly by
the freeze. He noted that staff will be workshopping the entire
Tree Protection Ordinance on April 17, 1986.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved staff recommendation to forward a comment
of no objection to the proposed project.
15
BOOK U P�1GF 994
6 -MAR 2 6 1986
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK 63 Fr'uC9��'3
I. Prisoner Transport Contract
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/17/$6:
TO: The Board of County DATE: March 17, 1986 FILE:
Commissioners
SUBJECT: PRISONER TRANSPORT
CONTRACT
FROM:J ilson REFERENCES:
Ass' nt County Attorney
As you know, the Department of Detention and the Sheriff's office
have historically contracted with private agencies to transport
County prisoners to other institutions within the state and
otherwise. Prior to entering business arrangements with such
companies, it is necessary that a contract be executed in order
to establish the rights and liabilities of each party.
R & R Security, Inc. is a local company which recently began
providing a prisoner transport service. The Detention Center
staff would like to enter into a contract with R & R in order to
have a second transport company available to facilitate the
transfer of prisoners.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved the following contract with R & R Security,
Inc. for prisoner transport service.
CONTRACT WILL BE PUT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK WHEN
FULLY EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
J. Annual HUD Contributions Contract for Housing_ Certificate
Program - Section 8 - No. A-3409 as Extended
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/19/86:
16
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: March 19, 1986 FILE:
SUBJECT: Request for Approval and Signature on
Section 8 Annual Contributions Contract
No. A-3409 as extended
3l
v
FROM: L. l. Thomas REFERENCES: l , ,1
Assistant Executive Director l Frr
I. R. C. Housing Authority
The Department of Housing and Urban Development has submitted an extension
of our Annual Contributions Contract, A-3409,through September 30, 1987. The
documents are attached for your review and approval.
H.U.D. is unable to extend the ACC for the full two-year period until they
receive funding from their Central Office sufficient to do so. The current
extension provides us the authority to issue certificates through September 30,
1986. They expect to soon receive amendment money at which time they will fur-
ther extend our ACC based on the amount of money made available to the Jackson-
ville office.
The documentation required by H.U.D. for their final approval and execution
of the contracts is submitted for consideration and approval of the Board of
County Commissioners.
(1) Five (5) Copies of ACC Part I Number A-3409 of the Annual
Contributions Contract for Housing Certificate Program.
. I recommend that the County Commission authorize the Chairman of the Board
of County Commissioners to execute these contracts for transmittal to the Jack-
sonville office of H.U.D.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved the Annual HUD Contributions Contract
A-3409, extended through September 30, 1987, and
authorized the Chairman's signature.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
17
MAR 2 6 196
BOOK 63 FADE 9,96
BOOK 63 .Fa.U' .997
K. Approval of Out -of -State Travel __ Hurricane _Conference
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved out-of-state travel for Commissioners
and appropriate staff to attend the National Hurricane
Conference in Houston, Texas, April 16-18, 1986.
L. Appointment_of John Acor to Regional Planning Council
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/19/86:
\,
RECE j V&D
o..i« o. TM 00aau cc0
CITY Ctanx
t%_£ Z�
City o, f ' Vero Beach
�1 1053 -20th PLACE - P. 0. BOX 1389
-; VERO BEACH, FLORIDA - 32961-1389
' Te&phone: 567-5151
;w _
March 19, 1986
Mr...Dan Cary, Executive Director
Regional Planning Council
P.O. Box 396
Stuart, Florida
Dear Mr. Cary:
The Vero Beach City Council at their meeting on
.March 18, 1986, appointed Vice -Mayor John Acor to
replace Mayor William Cochrane as an alternate member
to the Regional Planning Council.
sincerely,
Phyl�is A. Neer ge
City Clerk
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved the appointment of John Acor to replace
William Cochrane as an alternate member to the
Regional Planning Council.
18
APPOINTMENT TO DISTRICT IX HEALTH COUNCIL
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/27/86:
S' IX HEALTH COUNCIL, INC.
ST IC
4455 WESTROADS DRIVE
West Palm Beach, FI. 33407 Tel. (30S) 845-6070
a•.a
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Chairman
Robert L. Broadway
Vice Chairman
Harold Kirsh, D.O.
Secretary/Treasurer
John W. Abney
John Gibe
Luis R. Guerrero, M.D.
Dan Lucas, M.D.
Jack McGregor
Kenneth M. Michels, Ph.D.
Gary S. Nordmark
J.B. Norton, Jr.
Joseph G. Snyder
Fred Wiggin
STAFF
Executive Director
Edward O. Holloway, M.S.P.H
Health Planners
Barbara H. Jacobowitz, M.S.
Robin J. Brocato, M.H.S.
Administrative Assistant
Charlotte Friend, B.S.
Secretary
Bernice Wertzberger
January 27, 1986
Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Indian River County Board of Commissioners
1840 Twenty -Fifth Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Chairman Scurlock:
WSTRI.I3UTION LIST
Commissicilers
A;rr:..ictrator
tt ^y
C1.:fa::.
Firia:i::e
Other
In 1984, the Indian River County Board of Commissioners made the
appointments shown below to serve on this Board for a period of two
years. Those appointments will expire on June 30, 1986.
In considering appointments for the next two year term, you should
be aware that the Florida Administrative Code (Copy attached) pro-
vides for a rotation of categories at this time. This rotation is por-
trayed for your convenience as follows:
.DISTRICT IX HEALTH COUNCIL, INC.
ROTATION OF MEMBERSHIP CATEGORIES
Per Chapter 10-5, Florida Administrative Code
New Number of Appoint -
Current Number of Appoint- ments by Member Cate -
County ments By Member Category qory Effective 7/1/86
Indian River 1 1 Consumer 1 Provider
Serving Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, Palm Beach,& St. Lucie Counties
19
MAR 2 6 1986
BOOK 63 F,�uC- 999
BOOK 63 PnE 999
Chairman Scurlock 1/27/86 Page' 2
Your Current Appointment is: To Be Appointed:
Consumer Consumer
Mr. J. B. Norton, Jr. None
Provider Provider
None One
District IX Health Council, Inc. respectfully requests that you take
action on this appointment so that the new Board will serve from
July 1, 1986 to June 30, 1988.
Sincerely,
DISTRICT IX HEALTH COUNCIL, INC.
Edward O. Holloway, MSPH
Executive Director
Michael O'Grady, Administrator at Indian River Memorial
Hospital, introduced Stephen L. Holmes, Vice President of
Operations at Indian River Memorial Hospital, who gave a brief
summary of his extensive education and background in health care.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
appointed Stephen L. Holmes to the District IX Health
Council.
99
6
PUBLIC HEARING - Water_ Franchise - Humana Hospital
The hour of 9:15 o'clock having passed, the Deputy Clerk
read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to
wit:
c`• VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on ea
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper publish
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement, beii
a
in the matter
In the
lished In said newspaper in the issues of/J_%z--
Court, was pu
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun.
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount. rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication In the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscrAd bevfore m�isn_/6E day of �� A.D. 19
(SEAL) (Clerk of
The Indian lilve► Coon Bdarti o NOTICE OF MBUC HEAR -- -- .
County County ars to a ted at 84 how 8 public hem do AAarch 2g,
1988 at 9:15 tin is the r franchise Chambers located a u 1840 2Sth Street, Vero Beach, Florida, to
consider granting a water bant:hise to Humana, Inc. dba Humana
Franchise, for the hospital and medical plus's located on the �f SeStrom ,Water System
a1 (see map below), cQr!ler of Bay 5beet and weal W U
m
m
C31 t?�
•U
Ov
%D
tA, R•
p•
ter:
.%,
-
11[[ SM. 21 OF FLEWING GRANT
All interested persons are Invited .to this meeting. If any person ddckjes to appeal
made by the Board of County Commissioners with any decision
tng, she that a verbatim record of the proceedings is respect to any matters considered t talus meet.
ensure the will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose It she may need to
made, which record hWudea the testimony end
evidence upon the appeal is to be heard.
Don C. Scurlock, Jr., Chairman
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
Mar. 18, 1988
21
MAR 2 6 1986 Bou 63 FajC- 1000
,-,MAR 2 6 1966 BOOK 6.3 �,,GdOOI
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/19/86:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COWSERVES
RS DATE: MARCH 19, 1986
THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR, UTILITY
FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: PROPOSED FRANCHISE HUMANA
BACKGROUND
Humana Hospital had applied for a water franchise to serve its AMDECO
Project at the Sebastian Hospital Site. A copy of the proposed franchise
is attached along with a map of the proposed service area.
RECOMMENDATION
Utility Staff recommends approval of the requested franchise of Humana
Hospital based on the outcome of the public hearing and the outcome of he
study of the Roseland Area to be submitted by Masteller and Moler withi�r 90
days.
Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that Humana
Hospital already has a water franchise to service the hospital
itself and this water franchise would permit the hospital to
service some outlying medical offices on the premises. Last week
the Board passed Resolution 86-11, giving them a 90 -day delay on
the requirements of a utility franchise pending the results of a
study being conducted by Masteller & Moler. He recommended that
we go through the public hearing process today and get the
Board's decision in 90 days pending the outcome of the study.
Chairman Scurlock opened the Public Hearing and asked if
anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
closed the Public Hearing.
22
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
continued this item to 90 days from today until the
results are in from the study of the Roseland/Sebastian
area being done by Masteller and Moler.
REQUEST FROM CITRUS_ ELEMENTARY_ PTA FOR 3 -COLOR TRAFFIC LIGHT AT
4th STREET AND 27th AVENUE
The Board reviewed the following letter dated 3/11/86;
March 11, 1986
Don Scurlock
Transportation Planning Committee
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Fl. 32960
Dear Mr. Scurlock;
=W
The parents of Citrus Elementary School students and concerned citizens
of the surrounding community are requesting that a three (3) - color traffic
light be installed at the intersection of 4th Street and 27th Avenue.
The growing number of accidents at this intersection, combined with the
general difficulty in crossing 27th Avenue, due to its high traffic
flow, compels us to request this traffic light.
Enclosed is a signed petition requesting that a three (3) - color traffic
light be installed at the intersection of 4th Street and 27th Avenue.
Citrus Elementary PTA would like our traffic signal request and petition
'placed on the agenda at a County Commissioners meeting in the near future.
If you need any further information, please feel free to contact me. I
look forward to hearing from you concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
&be Conklin,
Citrus Elementary PTA President
3355 King's Highway
Vero Beach, F1. 32960
(Home phone - 569-2451)
(Work phone - 567-6636
PETITION WITH APPROXT14ATELY
300 SIGNATURES ON FILE IN
COMMISSION OFFICE
23
BOOK PACE�Q
�
MAR 2 6 1986
I
11O�
MAR 2 � �� 6 BOOK �� P.1CF1�
After Chairman Scurlock announced that the Citrus Elementary
School PTA has requested that this item be postponed until a
later meeting. Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that
the request from the PTA came at the same time staff had ..
scheduled their recommendations for the Board's action today, and
staff is recommending approval of the traffic light at Citrus
Elementary.
Chairman Scurlock felt in that case that the Board could
review the matter today and send the PTA a letter advising them
of what action was taken.
Director Davis reviewed the following memo dated 3/19/86:
TO: The Honorable Members of ' DATE: March 19, 1986 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH:
Michael Wright,
County Administrator SUBJECT:
Transportation Planning
Committee Recommendations _
of March 11, 1986
FROM: REFERENCES:
James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
DESCRIPTION RM CONDITIONS
'During the March 11, 1986 meeting of the Transportation Planning Committee,
the Committee unanimously recommended the following:
1) Signalize the intersection of 4th. Street and 27th Ave. (CR607),
construct a left turn lane at the 4th Street approaches to the inter-
section at 27th Avenue, and improve pedestrian access at this inter-
section due to the existence of Citrus Elementary School on the
Southwest corner of the intersection.
2) Expedite the installation of four school beacons at the following
elementary school
Osceola Elementary
Vero Beach Elementary
Thompson Elementary
Fellsmere Elementary
The installation of these beacons is currently scheduled for late FY
86/87.
During the Feb. 10, 1986 TRC meeting, signalization and 8th Street
widening was approved at 8th Street and 27th Avenue.
P39
M W M
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
All of the above projects are currently warranted. School beacons are to
be installed this fiscal year at Dodgertown Elementary, Sebastian Elemen-
tary, and Rosewood Elementary. The costs of the new projects above are as
follows
4th Street at 27th Avenue
Signalization $ 20,000
Road widening $ 25,000
R/W acquisition* $150,000
Pedestrian Improvement $ 5,000
$200,000
*Two single family homes are very close to the existing edge of
pavement.
4 additional school beacons
4 @ $5,000 $20,000
8th Street at 27th Avenue
Signalization(funded FY85/86 $ 12,500
Road widening $ 25,000
R/W acquisition $ 10,000
Pedestrian Improvements $ 5,000
$ 52,500
As noted, the most costly item is right-of-way acquisition along 4th Street
west of 27th Ave. Existing single family dwellings and a large canal
create a construction in the available right-of-way corridor. The county
currently has a 30' right-of-way along 4th Street in this area.
Right of way acquisition is also necessary along 8th Street however, no
structures are involved.
RECOMMATIONS AND FUNDING
It is recommended that Local Option Gas Tax funds be utilized to fund the
$272,500 for the three projects as soon as possible. If the engineering
can be accomplished so that structures can be avoided, the cost will be
significantly less.
Approximately $600,000 per year is collected from the existing 2� Local
Option Gas Tax.
Staff also recommends that an outside consultant be retained to engineer
these projects. Professional fees should not exceed 100 of construction
costs or approx. $12,000.
Director Davis noted that in analyzing the costs for
improvements to this intersection, it was discovered that the
right-of-way costs would be the most expensive. Two homes on the
northwest corner and the canal on the south corner constrict our
ability to widen the road and provide pedestrian facilities.
Staff hopes to be able to miss the two homes and perhaps take
just a garage. They would like to go ahead with the engineering,
see what their ability is, and then come back with a firm cost
estimate. They also intend to look into the feasibility of
culverting versus acquisition of right-of-way.
25
MAR 2 6 19861.)BOOK 63 P,400
qq
LIAR 2 6 198 rr�BoaF�1GEd�
Director Davis reported that the TPC also addressed the
installation of beacon lights at four elementary schools. Last
year staff implemented 3•beacons and this year they are
recommending four additional beacons.
The third item in the memo addresses the widening and
signalization of the 8th St. and 27th Avenue intersection,
including some minor pedestrian improvements. Although these
three projects are recommended to be implemented at this time,
some of the funds are not budgeted. The option is to use local
gas taxes, which also are not allocated at this time. Some of
those funds might be necessary to finish the Indian River
Boulevard/12th Street project, but we won't know that until the
bids are received. Staff feels fairly confident we can do this
work in addition to the other projects we have under our current
funding capability.
Chairman Scurlock reported that criticism is being received
about the delay in finishing several approved projects, and
Director Davis pointed out how busy staff is. Right now they
need authorization to go ahead and advertise for engineering
services on these projects and look into the possibility of
contracting for engineering services on the other 94 projects and
bring that information back to the Board. He noted that a lot of
their work has been on large jobs such as the Jail and the
Lindsey Road culvert.
Commissioner Wodtke felt that if we are to the point where
we need to spend $12,000 for engineering services for just two
intersections, than it might be wise to hire another person in
Engineering. However, he believed we should proceed first with
the installation of the traffic lights and then go ahead and do
the engineering on the right-of-way, etc.
Director Davis believed by contracting for engineering
services, we could get the signals up and the road widened faster
than doing it inhouse. The signals at 4th and 8th Streets are
approximately $20,000 each and staff feels that we would not be
26
- M
putting ourselves out of funding the 12th Street/Indian River
Boulevard project, even though this $250,000 would be using a
significant amount of money generated by the optional 2� gas tax.
He noted that $300,000 is generated for every 14 of gas tax.
Director Davis explained the Equipment Grant Program, but
advised that the DOT won't have funding for this during the next
5 years.
Chairman Scurlock felt the bottom line is that the necessary
improvements to State roads are not going to get done unless the
County finds another way to fund the expense.
Commissioner Wodtke suggested that we track the previous
commitments made in the DOT's 5 -Year Program for Indian River
County projects so that in 5 years we will be able to get the
money.
Commissioner Bowman asked when we would begin receiving
monies through the 64 optional local gas tax, and Director Davis
understood that the first draw would be in December.
Administrator Wright noted that although the County did not
obligate any money from the existing 24 tax, the funds must be
spent on new projects. We just have been building up the account
and have not spent a nicke-I of those funds as yet.
Chairman Scurlock understood then that from a cash flow view
point, it is not going to hinder us if we go ahead and take
action today on these recommendations and that staff's
recommendation is to approve the projects as outlined and
withhold final approval of funding until after the workshops and
public hearing are held on the matter of increasing the local
optional gas tax to 44 or 64.
27
Boa 63 PnEIM06
PF��E.��J�
MAS 2 6 1986 lu'
BOOK �e�
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED
by Commissioner Wodtke, that the Board approve staff
recommendations and authorize staff to proceed with the
installation of a 3 -color traffic light at 4th Street
and 27th Avenue; the beacons for the four elementary
schools; the widening and signalization at 8th Street
and 27th Avenue; and the engineering for each of these
three projects, with the understanding that the funding
will be withheld until after a public hearing is held
on increasing the local optional gas tax.
Under discussion, Commissioner Wodtke asked if the Motion
authorizes doing the signalization immediately, but Director
Davis stated that they have to engineer the intersection first so
that they know exactly where to put the poles. He believed,
however, that they could have the lights up by the time school
starts in the fall.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion
was voted on and carried unanimously (3-0).
Commissioner Wodtke felt that it should not take too much
engineering to determine where the poles should go and suggested
using an arm -type aluminum traffic light structure similar to the
ones currently being used in Palm Beach County.
SHELVING FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAW LIBRARY
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/19/86:
28
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: March 19, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
THRU: Michael Wright
County Administrator
SUBJECT: Shelving for Indian River
THRU: H.T. "Son Dean County Law Library
Director, Gene Services
'110 �
Lynn Williams J
FROM: superintendent REFERENCES:
Buildings & Grounds
Staff has been advised by Judge Vocelle of a current need for
additional shelving for the Indian River County Law Library.
The Law Library is presently housed in the Courthouse Annex. It
occupies 1680 square feet of space consisting of one large room for
storage and display of law books and a second room for reading,
research, and additional book display.
There are approximately 11,000 volumes of books on hand with another
65 (average) received monthly. The books are stored on a variety of
book shelves, some metal, some wood. Space for future library
expansion is non-existent within the Courthouse Annex.
Staff has previously investigated the posibility of installing a
mobile shelving system for condensation of the existing books. These
systems are used where floor space is at a premium, and are presently
used by the Property Appraiser's office, Health Department, and the
Clerk of the Court. The Law Library certainly meets the criteria as
an example of an area in need of a mobile storage system.
Initial investigations have shown that each system is designed for
the particular use and existing conditions of each installation,
therefore a simple cost'per unit cannot be assigned. Expansion
capability must also be considered during the design of the system.
Staff estimates that there is 2,050 lineal feet of shelving in the
Law Library at this time. If the present growth rate continues, we
project an annual increase of approximately 160 lineal feet of
shelving, or an average of 8 standard 3 foot bookcases per year.
One firm who prepared a plan approximately one year ago proposed
installation of 2,457 lineal feet of shelving which would allow for
roughly two (2) years growth from our present size.
Staff estimates based on the expenditures of the Property Appraiser's
office and the Health Department, and conversations with vendors
providing these systems, that a system for the law library to house
approximately one-half of the existing volumes will cost in the
neighborhood of $16,000 to $20,000.
We attempted to contact vendors for proposals but all vendors stated
they would have to inspect the area, intended use, and existing
conditions before they would quote even a ball -park figure. However,
based on previous estimates we are anticipating an expenditure in the
neighborhood of $40,000 for the total of 2500 lineal feet of shelving
with very little expansion capability at hand.
Staff requests the Board's recommendation on meeting the current and
future anticipated needs for shelving for the Law Library. There was-.
no money budgeted for this project in Fiscal Year 1985-86.
29
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK 63, a; 'US
LIAR 2 6 1966 Boos 63 P�'u 4M 9
Sonny Dean, Director of General Services, explained that
Commissioner Lyons, who is out ill today, asked to have this on
placed on the agenda today in order to request additional
shelving which is greatly needed for the Law Library. Money is
available in the Court Facility Fund, which has a current balance
of $76,623.76.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved this item with funds to come out of the
Court Facility Fund.
TO: Honorable Board of County
Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
Account Number
106-901-516-066.41
106-901-581-099.91
Explanation:
DATE: March 26, 1986 FILE:
SUBJECT: Budget Transfer
for Shelving at
Law Library
REFERENCES:
Account Name Increase
Office Furniture & Equipment $20,000
Reserve for Contingency
New shelving in Law Library not to exceed $20,000.
Contingency Balance
Shelving
BALANCE
30
$62,240
(200,000)
$42,240
-Decrease
$20,000
CONSIDERATION TO INCREASE LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX TO 6t
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/17/86:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE. March 17, 1986 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH:
Michael Wright,
County Administrator SUBJECT:
Consideration to Increase
Local Option Gas Tax to 6� _
FROM:
James W. Davis, P. E. , REFERENCES: J.W. Davis to
Public Works Director Transportation Planning
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
During the. March 11, 1986 Transportation Planning Committee meeting, the
Committee unanimously recammnded to the Board of County Canmissioners that
the Local Option Gas Tax in Indian River County be raised to 6G beginning
Sept. 1, 1986. This action was taken to provide additional revenue using
the "user fee" philosophy to fund a portion of the present $61 million
shortfall for the 20 year Capital Improvement Program.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Staff has prepared estimated revenue projections for the County's current
revenue sources (see attached backup information). Some alternatives to
fund the $61 million shortfall are as follows:
1) User Fee - Increase Local Option Gas Tax (LOGT) to 0 to provide
an estimated $24 million of the $61 million shortfall. A portion
of the remaining $37 million shortfall may be acquired through
greater Florida DOT participation on a cost sharing basis.
Recent state legislation qualifies those County's that have
adopted a full 0 LOGT to share in DOT project funds.
2) Raise additional revenue from ad valorum taxes or other types of
property assessments.
RECON,4EMATIONS
Staff concurs with the Transportation Planning Comnittee's action and
requests permission to conduct a public hearing on this issue in April,
1986.
Administrator Wright asked if we could schedule the public
hearing for the earliest possible Wednesday because we are
heading into our budget work in early May.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, that the Board authorize staff to
advertise a public hearing at the earliest possible
date to consider increasing the local option gas tax to
64.
31
BOOK 3 FAGF1O�0
MAR 2 6 1986
r
r
In
BOOK 0J+ -plq"A ,.l
Under discussion, Commissioner Wodtke asked that before the
public hearing is held the Board be furnished with complete
information as to how we are utilizing the existing 2t gas tax.
He also wanted to be sure that we have a full explanation of all
other taxes, impact fees, or other options.
Chairman Scurlock pointed out that we cannot fund any
backlog of improvements from impact fees as the funds must be
spent on new improvements in each district.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion
was voted on and carried unanimously.
BID #276 AND 279 - MOTOR GRADER - EVALUATION OF FIAT ALLIS ROAD
GRADER
Public Works Director Jim Davis reviewed the following staff
recommendation dated 3/25/86:
TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: March 25, 1986 FILE:
Board of County Commissioners
-.-THROUGH:
Michael Wright,
County Administrator SUBJECT:
Evaluation of Fiat Allis Road
Grader - Bid # 276 and 279
Motor Grader
00/
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E. l' REFERENCES:
Public Works Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
During the past week, the County Road and Bridge Department has had
possession of a Fiat Allis FG 75 Road Grader for demonstration purposes.
As a result of County operators using the machine for finish grading and
new road construction, the following analysis is presented:
1) Operator visibility is limited as a result of the design of,,thq,circle
turnstile and other components. The operators have a difficult time
seeing grade stakes.
2) When excavating Swale ditches in sandy soils the grader did not
maintain sufficient traction resulting in rear wheels spinning.
3) The throttle pedals were located in a different position than all
other graders in the fleet. This would result in operators having to
adjust their habitual operations.
4) The Fiat Allis does not meet bid specifications on brake type, forward
speeds, and other minor items.
32
r � �
The machine exhibited good power, excellent handling, and good control
panel. The operators were of the opinion that it would be a good grader
for use on a route system, but would not prefer it for finish work in road
construction due to visibility.
ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIM
After evaluation of the Fiat Allis Grader, staff presents the following
preference:
Purchase 1 Fiat Allis Grader for $66,570 less $4000 "
trade-in for the 1965 Cat (Equip. #27), resulting in an
expenditure of $62,570. At the present time, the Road
and Bridge Department budget contains $154,617 allocat-
ed for Heavy Equipment (after the recently purchased
Excavator is subtracted). Funds remain available in
the amount of $92,047 to purchase a 1985 Caterpillar
Grader ($40,965 after considering trade-in value of
1981 Cat) under total cost bid. The Fiat Allis would
be used on a maintenance route. The Caterpillar would
be used by the road building crew.
Recent appraisal books indicates that the County should request Kelly
Tractor to honor the repurchase bond.
PrrMMMDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the County purchase the following
Vendor: Dewind Machinery
1 Fiat Allis FG75 Purchase Price $66,570
less trade-in (1965 caterpillar) 4,000
$62,570
Vendor: Kelly Tractor
1 Caterpillar 120G Purchase Price $108,985
less repurchase/trade-in (1981 Caterpillar) 69,725
$ 39,260
Total Cost Repurchase Bond 1,705
$ 40,965
Total Expenditure = $103,535
Total Budgeted funds available = $154,617
Surplus = $ 51,082
If the above recommendation is accepted, the Board should recognize that
the brakes, transmission, and other minor components on the Fiat Allis FG
75 do not meet bid specifications and that these items be accepted.
Chairman Scurlock had a problem with trading in the 1981
Caterpillar and suggested trading in an older piece of equipment
instead.
Administrator Wright noted that we have a 174 Champion worth
about $8,000 and a '65 grader that they anticipate will need a
new engine shortly. He felt staff was very hesitant about buying
two Fiats and their recommendation is to buy one Fiat, trade in
the 181 CAT and purchase the 1985 CAT as outlined in the above
memo.
33
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK 03 Pa,E2
MAR �9�� Booz P, -EJ' 01.3
Commissioner Bowman asked if we have the legal ability to
waive the specifications on the Fiat grader, and Attorney Vitunac
confirmed that we can do that under our purchasing rules.
Director Davis stated that we have a surplus of $48,000 on
the other equipment in the account and are in very good shape for
unencumbered funds for heavy equipment for Road & Bridge.
Administrator Wright pointed out that by selling the 181 CAT
we are saving maintenance costs and getting $15,000 more than it
is worth. In addition, we have $100,000 which we are going to
carry over for next year unless the Board decides to spend it on
something else.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED
by Commissioner Wodtke, that the Board approve
staff recommendation to purchase (1) Fiat Allis
Grader and (1) Caterpillar tractor.
Under discussion, Commissioner Wodtke suggested buying one
Fiat and keeping the 181 CAT, but Administrator Wright felt that
we then would be subject to heavy maintenance costs after 5 years
and we would lose the opportunity of trading it in for almost
$70,000. He felt in the long run we are better off to look
towards what it is going to cost us next year and try to upgrade
our fleet. If -the Board lets us do this, next year we are
planning to replace the 1974 grader and that will make our oldest
motor grader a 1978, which will put us in pretty good shape.
Chairman Scurlock felt that if we went with a total cost
bid, they would be having an operator sit'on a brand new piece of
equipment every 5 years.
Director Davis believed that in this particular case the
reason Fiat -Allis has bid so much lower is to get their equipment
exposed.
34
� r i
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion
failed to pass by a vote of 1-2, Commissioners Wodtke
and Scurlock dissenting.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
authorized the purchase of (1) Fiat at this time.
Administrator Wright asked for instructions on what to do
with the 181 CAT, and Chairman Scurlock explained that the County
will keep the 181 CAT. However, Director Davis pointed out that
there is a leak in the head of the 181 CAT, which is one of the
reasons they would like to trade it in.
Chairman Scurlock stressed that it is very common for a
motor grader to last 15-17 years if it is run by a reasonable
operator, and Commissioner Bowman suggested tearing down the 181
CAT to see what repairs are needed. Administrator Wright pointed
out that if we do not exercise the option to sell the 181 CAT
today, the opportunity will be gone.
Chairman Scurlock noted that we don't have enough operators
to run all our present 8 graders at once, but Director Davis
explained that only happens once in awhile, just like any
equipment in any operation.
Chairman Scurlock was not convinced that the total cost
program was the best way to go economically on a motor grader
which is a piece of equipment that traditionally has a 7 -year
life.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board by a vote of 2-1,
Chairman Scurlock dissenting, authorized the additional
purchase of (1) 1985 Caterpillar grader from Kelly
Tractor, as recommended by staff.
35
MAR 2 6 1986
BOOK 63 P}1GE10 4
NAR
2 6 1986
BOOK
63 F° 01
UTILITY EASEMENT TO
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT FOR COUNTY
TREATMENT
PLANT
Administrator Wright explained that FP&L needs this easement
to set the meter at the sewer plant. If we ever move the line,
the easement goes away.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
`Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
granted the following easement to Florida Power &
Light.
0
i
36
RNMENT
Form 3723 (Stocked) Rev. 7/88
DWA 1394409 (1)
The undersigned, in consideration of the payment of $1.00 and other good and valuable considera-
tion, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grant and give to Florida Power &
Light Company, its licensees, agents, successors, and assigns, an easement forever for the construc-
tion, operation and maintenance of overhead and underground electric utility facilities (including
wires, poles, guys, cables, conduits and appurtenant equipment) to be installed from time to time;
with the right to reconstruct, ,improve, add to, enlarge, change the voltage, as well as, the size of
and remove such facilities or any of them within an easement feet in width (the approximate
location of which is shown in the sketch on Page 2 of this instrument) located within the following
described property:
An easement 10.00 feet wide lying 5.00 feet each side of the following
described centerline:
COM4WCING at the Southeast corner of the Northeast # of Section 14,
Tomship 33 South, Range 38 East, Indian River County, Florida; thence North
90000'00" West, (an assumed bearing), along the South line of the Northeast
# of said Section 14, a distance of 2655.11 feet; thence South 19042154"
West, a distance of 53.11 feet to the South -right -of -my of the Indian River
County Drainage District Lateral "D" Canal and the POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence North 19042154" East, a distance of .42 feet; thence North 00038100"
East, a distance of 1186.64 feet to Point "A"; thence continue North
00038100" East, a distance of 26.00 feet to the end of this line; returning
to Point "A"; thence North 89053120" East, a distance of 381.00 feet to the
end of this line; returning to Point "A"; thence South 89053120" West, a
distance of 22.00 feet to the West line of the Northeast } of said Section
14 and the end of this easement.
(See Exhbits "A" & "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof.)
Together with the right to permit any other person, firm or corporation to attach wires to any faci-
lities hereunder and lay cable and conduit within the easement and to operate the same for commu-
nication purposes with the right of ingress and egress to said premises at all times, to clear the land
and keep it cleared of all trees, undergrowth or other obstructions within the easement area; to
trim and cut and keep trimmed and cut all dead, weak, leaning or dangerous trees or limbs outside
of the easement area which might interfere with or fall upon the lines or systems of communi-
cations or power transmission or distribution, and further grants, to the fullest extent the under-
signed has the power to grant, if at all, the rights hereinabove granted on the land heretofore des-
cribed, over, along, under and across the roads, streets or highways adjoining or through said pro-
perty.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed and sealed this instrument on 2'6th
March 1986
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Approved for Utility matters: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: G.
Don C, Scurlock, Jr., Chai an
')
Approved as to form Attest: " , '�
and legal sufficiency Freda Wright, Clerk
By - _�rOviAU1111c Is (Corp. Seal)
Charle
STATE OF FLORIDA AND COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ��day
of March , 19J.6, by DON �� Sin nrx _ _.-rp
and FREDA WRIGHT respectively the Chairman
PrNvJ:6nd Clerk MWS, of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, BOARD OF COU TY
political subdivision, of the St t� of F1 rida,
C y 1I S S I ONE RS , a / __� 0WAt on behalf of said corporation.
My CommisioJn Expire.:
A 2 6 q9 � N'.0"'A " 9GENEUC STATE OF FLE U DA
''i 8 mtB�'" RALSRANCE INUNQ �
Ail )N EXPIRES JULY R tom
.� ��State .
BOOK 6 3 F'�G4018
N 00.38'00"�
J�.o•
S 9'S3'to'W N B9•S3'�O°6 391.00'
I2200' .
a
F
go
Ogo0
z
U3 vi
T01
F til
1L I'
0�
W
Z �
JO
FNN- v -
u
3
14
0
8
N P- a2'
BOOK 63 Pv,101
7
NORTH
NOT TO SCALE
- f
H 'e.o. w. c ~E o`
SNO/4N iP/ VAR C WA/'/Y
- OLAiN.�6i O�STL'/ eT
LATFd �l t •L7 � CAN.6L
P.o.c.
'oo'oo`w isssii'
M L /N! *,C TNi N OF SIV. / t
SE Goeaa4 of TNS Ni y
OF S�me.v r+, Towv3.1.A .]3 ,
AA~ as
?NO/AN Amzw Lomwrf ; ^A000i
SKETCH OF' DESCRIPTION
PREPARED FOR
FLORIDA- POWER k LIGHT CO.
SECTION 1¢ , T 333 S, R 36 E
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
EXHIBIT "A"
RWO# 6254-/-040
D W A# 391'-04 ?
EXHIBIT "B"
Grantee agrees to relocate or remove, at Grantoe's expense, its
facilities upon written request by Grantor.
If facilities are to be relocated, a new location must be mutually
agreeable to both Grantor and Grantee.
Grantee further agrees, in such event and after written notice from
Grantor, to release all rights herein granted.
s
W E A T H E R ING TON
L A N 0 9 U A V E Y O A S
2101 OlAM06 AY[NYl 1704 L 1Lll 61111441 PLAZA II
ItPI[6C4 /1A.11460 Poll 1L LUClt /1A714S2
11011441.6064 1106) 111.1116
WO es- /t47 FB24,8 PG 42- DWG
38
M
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS TO STATE DEPT. OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/17/86:
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: March 17 , 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Fd.U.6 An SUBJECT:
Robert M. K at ng, 1CP RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
Planning & Development Director TRANSMITTAL OF COMPRE-
HENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
APPLICATIONS TO STATE
DEPARTMENT OF COM-
FROM:RS REFERENCES: MUNITY AFFAIRS
Richard Shearer
Chief, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at 'their
regular meeting of March 26, 1986.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The 1985 planning legislation contains a provision mandating a 90
day review period by the State Department of Community Affairs
after a Local Planning Agency has held public hearings on pro-
posed amendments to a local government's Comprehensive Plan and
before the local government adopts the amendments. The -Depart-
ment of Community Affairs requires that the local legislative
body authorize the transmittal of any proposed amendment to a
Comprehensive Plan prior_ to beginning the ninety day review
period.
On March 13, 1986, the County's Planning and Zoning Commission,
sitting as the Local Planning Agency, held public hearings to
consider making recommendations on nineteen proposed amendments
to the County's Comprehensive Plan.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
The Planning Department feels that the best way to document the
fact that the Board has authorized the transmittal of the pro-
posed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to the State for
review is through the passage of a resolution authorizing the
transmittal. However, this resolution does not necessarily mean
that the Board intends to adopt all of these proposed amendments.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends approval.
39
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK FACE&8
i
FX019
l��'Oli .� `%F
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
adopted Resolution 86-12, authorizing transmittal
of Comprehensive Plan amendment applications to the
Florida Dept, of Community Affairs.
40
RESOLUTION NO. 86- 12
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE
TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLI-
CATIONS, STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS, AND THE RECOMMEND-
ATIONS OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY TO THE DEPART-
MENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOR A MANDATORY NINETY DAY REVIEW PERIOD.
WHEREAS, Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes,
requires that local governments prepare and adopt Compre-
hensive Plans, and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has
adopted a Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Florida Statutes,
and
WHEREAS, Florida Statutes provide for the amendment
of Comprehensive Plans twice per calendar year, and
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission,
sitting as the local planning agency, has held public hear-
ings and made recommendations concerning these amendments,
and
WHEREAS, Florida Statutes require that the Board of
County Commissioners pass a resolution authorizing the
transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the Depart-
ment of Community Affairs of the State of Florida for a
mandatory ninety day review period,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that
the enclosed Comprehensive Plan Amendment applications, staff
recommendations, and the recommendations of the local plan-
ning agency are hereby authorized for transmittal to the
Department of Community Affairs for a mandatory ninety day
review period.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commis-
sioner Wodtke who moved its adoption. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Bowman and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
MAR 2 6 1996 BOOK 63 Fmu'4020
L_
r
MAR 2 6 196
BOOK 63.fPgUE.iU
RESOLUTION NO. 86-12
Chairman Don
C. Scurlock, Jr.
Aye
Vice -Chairman Patrick B.
Lyons
sen
Commissioner
Richard N.
Bird
sent
Commissioner
Margaret C.
Bowman
Aye
Commissioner
William C.
Wodtke, Jr.
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared Resolution No.
86- 12 , adopted and duly passed this 26th day of
March , 1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By a ca G 2"�
DON C. SCURLOCK, JR.
Chairman
' --._c - j
Attest:%
FREDA WRIGHT
Clerk
APPOINTMENT TO INDIGENT HEALTH CARE PLANNING TASK FORCE
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/12/86:
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT
2825 14TH AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
VERO BEACH, FL 32960 1840 25TH STREET -SUITE N-1 18
TELEPHONE (305) 867.1101VERO SFAcH. FL 32960
SUN -COM 451-5302 F 1 1213, ��
TELEPHONE (305) 567.8000 EXT. -229
`(1 1
SUN -COM 424-1229
a
zo "f March 12, 1986
Ln;, b'
co0
,
FROM: J.B. Tucker, M.D. .04
Director, IRCPHU
SUBJECT: Indigent Health Care Planning
TO: Mike Wright, Indian River County Administrator
EXtensive interest is developing in planning of Indigent Health Care programs
for Indian River County. As you ]mow, FS 154.302 assigns to the County the
financial obligation for all those costs not reimbursed by other governnental
agencies.
Indian River County is unique in structure, for in addition to the Board of
County Commissioners, the Indian River Memorial Hospital taxing authority
legislation places the MM Board of Trustees in a position of responsibility
in this area.
42
Current limited planning by several involved agencies (IRCPHU, nm, District 1X
Health Counci., HRS, and others ) has developed to a stage indicating the time is
rapidly apporaching when full participation by a respresentative of the BCC is
highly desirable in order to best serve the Board's interest.
Therefore, I solicit your recommendation as to the best way to proceed in selecting
a participant for both short range and long range planning.
I recommend the selection have the full confidence of the BCC, and, most important,
have time to attend several meetings. Experience in health, financial and legal
affairs seems highly. desirable.
Please contact me with your advice at your earliest opportunity.
Commissioner Wodtke indicated he would accept the
appointment to this task force, but noted that the memo said to
be prepared to travel and spend some time. He hoped it would not
conflict with his duties as County Commissioner.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously (3-0)
approved the appointment of Commissioner Wodtke
to the Indigent Health Care Task Force.
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF INDIAN RIVER
Rnt II FV4Rn
The Board reviewed the following letter dated March 31,1986:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Telephone: (305) 567-8000
March 21, 1986
Suncom Telephone: 424-1011
0
Mr. Steve Henderson,
Attorney at Law
817 Beachland Blvd.
Vero Beach, F1. 32963
Subject: Indian River Boulevard - South Extension -
Right -of -Way Patrician Enterprises
Dear Steve,
To clarify the options discussed during yesterday's meeting
in the County Attorney's office applicable to deeding the
150' wide by 3301± long right-of-way parcel which is a
portion of the South one-half of the North one-half of
Government Lot 7, Indian River County, Florida, owned by
Patrician Enterprises, the following is presented
43
E3ooK F,uc1499
BOOK 63 D'a
OPTION #1 Right of Way Donation - Development density to be
determined based on Gross Acreage of Parent Tract
prior to right of way transfer.
If this option is chosen, the owner would be
allowed to construct the same number of units on
the remaining parent tract that was allowed prior
to donation. For example, if the applicable
zoning were 10 units/per acre, approximately 100
units could be constructed on the remaining 9
acres if 1 acre were donated. All 'other current
development conditions required by the County's
code of ordinance would apply.
a
OPTION #2 Impact Fee Credit - As compensation for'donated
right-of-way, the County could issue a credit to
apply to the Parent Tract towards Transportation
Impact Fees in the amount equal to the appraised
value of the right-of-way. parcels. The impact fee
per unit depends on the type of unit constructed.
OPTION #3 Combination of Impact Fee Credit and Retainage of
Development Density
A combination of the.above options I and 2 could
apply. This may result in partial development
density transfer to the parent tract or impact fee
credit for that portion of the right-of-way
applicable.
As per your recent conversation Don Finney, the County
Right -of -Way agent, the value of the approximately 1 acre of
proposed right-of-way has been determined to be $38,000. In
addition, access to the property would be consolidated with
neighboring property and a culvert would be installed to
provide access to the property at the time of construction.
Please contact me if you have any questions in this regard.
Thank you for your cooperation in assisting the Public Works
division to proceed with this needed project.
Sincerely,
Jame W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
Public Works Director Jim Davis, referring to a map of the
entire Boulevard alignment, pointed out the remaining properties
south of the Tanen property yet to donate right-of-way for the
Boulevard. The Patrician Enterprises property involves about 1
acre of right-of-way that is part of a 10 -acre tract, and in
return for the donation of this right-of-way, they are requesting
the County to consider a combination of impact fee credits and
44
� r �
development density transfers. Our ordinance states that if a
developer donates right-of-way to the County, then his
development density can be based upon the gross acreage of his
parcel prior to the right-of-way donation. In this case, Mr.
Baker, who is representing Patrician Enterprises, has stated that
they want to exercise a combination of impact fee credit and
development density transfers. Staff has reviewed our ordinances
and the County Attorney's office has indicated those options are
available.
Chairman Scurlock felt that by using this approach, they
actually would end up with a little less density, rather than if
they were required to stack the additional units. This way it is
split, but it can happen only if there is a donation. He met
with Mr. Baker of Patrician Enterprises and they have agreed to
this. The only thing we must make clear is that they cannot get
a density transfer and an impact fee credit at the same time. It
is one or the other. You can split it, but you cannot get
double.
Director Davis asked for the Board's concurrence with the
options as set forth in the letter to Attorney Steve Henderson.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0,
Commissioners Lyons and Bird being absent) approved
the stipulations and the options to the right-of-way
being donated by Patrician Enterprises based upon the
letter to Attorney Steve Henderson dated March 21,
1986.
Director Davis next reviewed the Schacht parcels, and
explained that Mr. Schacht is a resident of Puerto Rico who has
indicated he would be willing to donate the right-of-way for
Indian River Boulevard and 8th Street as long as the County
provides a resolution similar to the one on the Tanen property.
45
MAR 2 6 1986 Boa 6 U 4 09,4:
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK 63 F,tG ;10-25
Mr. Schacht's attorney has prepared that resolution, which is
basically the same as the Tanen document. It is the same format
and involves the same conditions concerning the right-of-way with
the exception of the locations on the right-of-way.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, that the Board adopt Resolution
86-13, accepting under certain conditions the donation
of -right-of-way for the southerly extension of Indian
River Boulevard from R. A. Schacht and Peggy Schacht.
Commissioner Wodtke asked if there was anything in the
Resolution that requires the Schachts to apply for a rezoning
consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and Chairman
Scurlock explained that the proposed Resolution states that Mr.
Schacht and his wife have indicated their intention to apply for
a zoning consistent with the Comp Plan.
Attorney Vitunac advised that they are not really required
to do that, but are merely putting the County on notice that they
are trying to get a higher density. We are merely acknowledging
their intention, and not promising anything.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion
was voted on and carried unanimously (3-0).
46
RESOLUTION NUMBER 86-13
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has ,determined that the construction of a southerly
extension to Indian River Boulevard including improvements to
connecting roadways such as Twelfth Street and Sixth Avenue is
necessary to relieve traffic congestion along the U.S. 1
corridor; and
WHEREAS, the Indian River County Public Works Division, in
conjunction with private consultants, has prepared plans for the
construction and the paving and drainage improvements necessary
to complete the southerly extension of Indian River Boulevard and
easterly extension of Twelfth Street; and
WHEREAS, Peggy Jane Schacht, individually and as Trustee and
R. A. Schacht and Peggy Schacht, his wife, are the owners of
approximately 18 acres of property (said land being legally
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto) through which a portion
of the proposed southerly extension of Indian River Boulevard;
and
WHEREAS, the property owned by Peggy Jane Schacht,
individually and as Trustee and R. A. Schacht and Peggy Schacht,
his wife, pursuant to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of Indian
River County has a land use designation of MD -2, medium density
residential (up to ten units/acre); and
WHEREAS, Peggy Jane Schacht, individually and as Trustee and
R. A. Schacht and Peggy Schacht, his wife, have indicated their
intention to apply for zoning consistent with the.. Comprehensive
Lund Use Plan as to some 18 acres -of the aforesaid property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County recognizes that the County would have to purchase from
Peggy Jane Schacht, individually and as -Trustee and R. A. Schacht
•nd r,2ggy Schacht, his wife, the property needed for the right-
of-way or institute proceedings to acquire the property needed by
the County for the Indian River Boulevard, which would require
payment by the County of the fair market value of the property;
and
1
MAR 6 16 BOOK F',a'
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK 6.3 FAGEld?
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that:
1. Indian River County hereby accepts the donation and
dedication of land for the southerly extension. of Indian River
Boulevard, said land being more fully described in Exhibit "B"
attached hereto.
2. Indian River County confirms and stipulates that the
land described herein as Exhibit "B" which is to be contributed
to the county is subject to Indian River County Code of Laws and
Ordinances, Appendix A, Zoning Section 23.3(d)(1)(c) and the
provisions of said law as of the date hereof shall apply to the
property described in Exhibit "B" and.Exhibit "A".
3. Indian River County agrees not to assess any of the
initial costs of paving, drainage and pedestrian and related
improvements to Indian River Boulevard, Twelfth.Street and Sixth
Avenue. against Peggy Jane Schacht, individually and as Trustee
and R. A. Schacht and Peggy Schacht, his wife, or to their
successors or assigns.
4. That the deeds from Peggy Jane Schacht and R. A.
Schacht and Peggy Schacht, his wife, shall provide that if the
construction of paving and drainage improvements to the southerly
extension of Indian River Boulevard are not begun within five
years from the date hereinafter set forth, then ownership of the
property described herein shall revert to Peggy Jane Schacht,
individually and as Trustee and R. A. Schacht and Peggy Schacht,
his wife, or,their successors or assigns.
5. Indian River County will oversize the proposed Indian
River Boulevard sewer line to the Vero Beach Waste Water
Treatment Plant to accommodate the property described in, Exhibit
"A" as zoned and in accordance with Zoning Section 23.3(d)(1)(c).
The county will also request the City of Vero Beach to increase
the waste water allocation to serve the properties described in
Exhibit "A". Although sewer impact fees would still be required,
line extension fees would not be necessary.
y 6. Indian River County agrees that in the construction of
the road, a positive drainage outfall will be provided for
drainage overflow purposes to serve the property described in
Exhibit "A" as well as all other property along the proposed
Indian River Boulevard. The roadway has been designed to meet the
State of Florida DER Water Quality Criteria established by
Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 17-3. The resulting drainage
swale system will be available to channel the overflow generated
from abutting property exceeding the 10 year, 24 hour storm
event. The design for road drainage should not restrict or impede
the existing drainage but will allow for the overflow from
adjacent properties and should improve the drainage.
7. Primary or secondary access to the property described
in Exhibit "A" from the Indian River Boulevard extension will be
provided. Primary access to the property described in Exhibit "A"
will also be permitted along Sixth Avenue.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Wodtke who moves its adoption. The Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Bowman and upon
being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Vice -Chairman Patrick B. Lyons Absent
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Absent
Commissioner
Margaret C.
Bowman
Aye
Commissioner
William C.
Wodtke, Jr.
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed
and adopted this 26 day of March. , 1986. r
ATTEST:
Freda Wright, CY
Clerk to tL�
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency
B 0., LP .42 -.-
Charles P. Vitunac
County Attorney
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By: G
49
iviAk 2 6 1986 BOOK 6 3 Fc1 2's
.
, MA R, Mw I -
BOOK 63 Fa:c4029
Director Davis reported that staff has been negotiating with
the Fultz, White and Beal families and has secured fair market
value appraisals for those properties. These property owners
have indicated that they would like to have access onto Indian
River Boulevard as well as fair market value. Basically, staff
feels that if the County purchases the right-of-way at fair
market value, that access to those properties should not be a
consideration in the negotiations. What staff is asking today is
for some direction on whether we should pay fair market value and
grant access to the Boulevard also. The Boulevard is intended to
be a limited access roadway and we have not been granting access
during right-of-way acquisition negotiations and up to now we
have not paid fair market value for any right-of-way either.
Administrator Wright understood that staff is saying that we
don't want to guarantee access if we pay fair market value. We
recommend access be considered as part of the site plan
regulations in effect at the time of development. We don't want
to deny them access, but we don't want to guarantee it either.
Director Davis stressed that staff does not recommend
approving an access situation now that would enchance the value
of the land.
Commissioner Bowman suggested a frontage road at 8th or 4th
Streets, and Director Davis felt that if access occurs along this
portion of the Boulevard, it should be managed in such a way that
access points are consolidated into either a frontage road or
common access for two properties. However, it would be premature
for us to comment on access at this time as we don't know how
these properties are going to develop. He noted that the Fultz
property has an easement to 6th Avenue.
W. E. Roddenberry, attorney representing Mrs. Fultz,
stressed that the problem is that this entire 150 ft. wide
right-of-way is coming off the Fultz' property which has been in
their family for 17 years. Normally, the right-of-way is taken
from two sides of the road, but in this particular instance,
50
Vista Gardens has built right down to the property line and all
the burden is falling on the Fultz side of the road. Sixth
Avenue, to which all of these properties have access, has
drainage problems. In Mrs. Fultz's case, she has a 10 -ft.
easement that runs through the Tropic Square Shopping Center and
where the asphalt drops off, it turns into a dirt road that goes
downhill to her house. During a heavy rainfall, there is a
torrent of water flowing down her driveway, and she is looking
forward to getting access onto Indian River Boulevard. During
negotiations with staff, Attorney Roddenberry understood that
access for Mrs. Fultz's property would not be a problem, but now
we are talking about a joint driveway along the Boulevard.
Administrator Wright stated that staff has no problem with
Mrs. Fultz applying for some type of access once the road is
built, but what we are saying today is that if we pay full price,
we don't want to guarantee access which would amount to paying in
excess of the value of the property. The access issue should be
handled on a needs basis.
Attorney Roddenberry did not see how guaranteeing them
access is paying more than fair market value, but Chairman
Scurlock stressed that it -would not be a problem if Mrs. Fultz or
her heirs continued to live there forever. However, if there was
a guaranteed access to the Boulevard, he would assume that
property could be marketed more easily than if it did not have
access.
Chairman Scurlock suggested guaranteeing access for single-
family residences only and approve one driveway for the White &
Fultz properties, which would be a right turn in and a right turn
off of the Boulevard.
Mrs. Fultz did not believe it was her fault that Vista
Properties built so near the line, and all she is asking for is
an access into her house from the Boulevard.
Chairman Scurlock advised Mrs. Fultz that was what the
County was going to do.
51
MAR 2 6 1986 BOOK. 63 Fmu, 230
PR 22 6
1986
BOOK
63 F',PEA311
Commissioner Wodtke understood
that we are going
to give
access to the three properties for existing single-family
dwellings only.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED
by Commissioner Bowman, that the Board approve
a single access for each of the Fultz, White and Beal
properties for single-family residential use only.
Commissioner Bowman objected to having 3 driveways accessing
Indian River Boulevard, and wondered if we could have just one
driveway with a connector to each of the 3 properties.
Administrator Wright stressed that they already have access
onto 6th Avenue.
Attorney Robert Jackson advised that when he represented the
Smeltzer family in their donation of right-of-way for the
Boulevard, he never heard the terms "impact credit" or "density
transfer." He stressed how precious our right of owning private
property is in America and wished to have Mrs. Smeltzer's
property included in those properties receiving access.
Chairman Scurlock ascertained from staff that Attorney
Jackson or his client had never been offered an "impact credit"
or "density transfer" during any discussions or negotiations for
right-of-way on Indian River Boulevard. He had assumed that if
we are to acquire -right-of-way for the Boulevard at the lowest
possible cost to the taxpayers, that every inducement, such as
density transfers and impact fee credits, would be used, and
could not understand why these people were not advised of these
options. However, the question now is whether the attorneys of
the families involved want to consider impact credits or density
transfers for their clients at this time.
Attorney Roddenberry stated that the Fultz's do not want to
consider these options, they just want access to the Boulevard.
52
� - r
Director Davis felt that the best way to do this would be to
provide a common access for the Beal and Smeltzer properties
under their existing land use and another for the Fultz and White
properties. There would be two driveway connections on to the
Boulevard, right turn in and right turn off.
Administrator Wright noted that all we are trying to protect
is the integrity of the road if the property develops at a much
higher density, and Chairman Scurlock believed Commissioner
Wodtke's Motion would accomplish that objective because it only
applies to single-family houses. If they ever start to develop
it as commercial, they will have to come in with a site plan.
COMMISSIONER WODTKE agreed to add the Smeltzer property
to his previous Motion. The Motion was voted on and
carried by a vote of 2-1, Commissioner Bowman
dissenting.
Commissioner Wodtke believed the Commission would prefer the
four families to work out a common access rather than having four
separate driveways onto the Boulevard.
Attorney Roddenberry -asked if the construction of the joint
accesses could be included in the Indian River Boulevard project,
and Director Davis advised that placing the culvert and making a
curb cut could be done when the road is built, but the driveway
would be at their cost.
Director Davis reported on the status of the remainder of
the parcels. Staff is still negotiating on the Postweiver parcel
and we are waiting for the mortgage release on the Cronin
property. Negotiations for the two small parcels at the 4th
Street connection, the Zippy Mart parcel and the Vista
Properties' parcel, will complete the acquisition of the Indian
River Boulevard right-of-way. What staff would like to do is go
out for bid on the Boulevard and the 12th Street widening along
53. q
MAR 2 6
1986 BOOK f'aci�a��
MAR 2 6 1966 BOOK 63
with the 8th Street connection, and phase the construction so
that the Boulevard and the 8th Street connection is built first.
Once that is open, we could do the heavy construction in the 12th
Street corridor and divert traffic to 8th and 16th Streets. . -
Administrator Wright advised that the Board has already
given authorization to go to bid, but Director Davis stated that
this was just for the Board's information.
SANDRIDGE GOLF CLUB - CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
Attorney Vitunac explained that the Board actually approved
this contract several weeks ago, but there are several changes
and staff feels that the Chairman should sign the contract as it
now stands.
Administrator Wright reviewed the following changes to the
standard AIA contract with Guettler 8 Sons, Inc. for the
construction of the new County golf course at Kiwanis-Hobart
Park:
Schedule of Values
Under Item (C) with respect to earthwork, it notes that lakes
will be dug as per plan, subject to a minimum 6 to 1 slope, top
of bank to lake bottom with a lake bottom elevation of 11.
Administrator Wright felt that we need a clear understanding with
the Architect as to how much earth is going to be removed under
the lump sum contract. He did not feel there would be a problem,
but we have to clarify the matter before the Chairman actually
signs the contract.
Amendment to Proposal, dated 3-7-86
II. IRRIGATION
Add: "to include the installation of the irrigation
system."
V. OPTIONAL TERMS
B. Administrator Wright felt we need to specify the
retainage amount at being 15% per category.
54
C. The "County" should be changed to read: The
"Contractor" will use a qualified "shaping foreman" that
is acceptable to the Architect.
Administrator Wright advised that the recommendation is for
the Chairman to sign the contract subject to the definition of
the amount of dirt to be removed and the depth of the lakes.
Chairman Scurlock wondered how they could have an amount
included for irrigation if they have not decided yet on which
type of system to use, and Administrator Wright explained that
the figure included is for installation of an irrigation system.
At a prior meeting the Board authorized them to pull out the
irrigation materials as a separate item and purchase them, but
the Board still needs to make a decision as to what system to go
with, either the Toro or the Rain Bird.
Chairman Scurlock felt that one of the problems with us
buying the materials is who is going to guarantee what.
Generally, when you have one package, the firm guarantees both
the materials and the labor.
Administrator Wright stated he would discuss that with the
Architect and the Contract.or.
Chairman Scurlock also noted there is no glue or teflon tape
included in the list for irrigation materials, and Administrator
Wright stated that they have not finalized the materials list as
yet and that is not part of this contract.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
authorized the Chairman's signature to the contract
with Guettler & Sons subject to the finalization with
the Architect of the settlement of the warranty issue
on materials vs. labor and the amount of dirt to be
removed and the depth of the lakes.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
--55
MBAR 6 1966 Bo�K 6 pm, 4^34
MAR 2 6 1996 BOOL{ 6 r4U�135
APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONER TO DATA PROCESSING COMMITTEE
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/20/86:
TO: County Commission DATE: March 20, 1986 FILE:
SUBJECT: Data Processing Committee
FROM: Alice E. White REFERENCES:
Administrative Aide I
The County Commission has never made an appointment to the new Data
Processing Committee. One Commissioner should be appointed to serve.
I
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (3-0)
appointed Commissioner Lyons to the Data Processing
Committee.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
The Board reviewed the following letter dated 3/24/86:
Cio of Vero Beach
1053 -20th PLACE - P. 0. BOX 1389
IJIAP 1986
-vj VERO BEACH, FLORIDA - 32961-1389
'5a! RE:=V M Telephone: 567-5151
OFFICE OF TX f2 ry®n ny
CITY CLERK �7'CORMIf()t4
March 24, 1986
Mrs. Liz Forlani
Administrative Aide
County Administration Building
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Mrs. Forlani:
This is to advise you of the following appointments
made by the City Council at their meeting of March
18, 1986:
56
Beach Restoration & Preservation Committee -
Ken Macht
Indian River County Parks & Recreation Committee -
Mike Wodtke
South Indian River County Fire District Advisory
Committee - William Cochrane and John Acor
County Transportation Planning Committee
William Cochrane
Economic Development Committee - Ken Macht
If you need any further information, please do not hesitate
to let me know.
Sincerely,
Irene B. Young
Deputy City Clerk
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously
approved the City of Vero Beach recommendations for
appointments to the five County committees named above.
DOCUMENTS TO BE MADE PART OF THE RECORD
A. Lease Agreement between IRC and Economic Opportunities
Council of Indian River County, Inc. for rental of Douglas School
- approved at the meeting -of January 8, 1986
57
BOOK 63 PA E 36
BOOB 63 f -,J&37
THIS LEASE, executed this 8th day of January ,
1986, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, hereinafter referred to as the "LESSOR",
and the ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
INC., a corporation existing under the laws of the State of
Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "LESSEE":
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Lessor is the owner of certain land in Indian
River County known as the Douglas School which Lessor is not now
using and which Lessor does not contemplate using in the
foreseeable future; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable in order to provide for the
health, welfare and general good of the citizens of Indian River
County that land be provided for Lessee for its use in
maintaining offices and a child development center; and
WHEREAS, THE Lessee has indicated its willingness to
improve the property hereinafter described and to maintain
thereon offices and a child development center;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of
TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable considerations and of the
covenants and agreements herein contained, the Lessor does hereby
let, demise, and lease unto said Lessee the following described
property situated in Indian River County, Florida, to wit:
-1-
r
M M M
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Beginning 210 feet, South of the Northeast corner of
Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 32,
Township 31 South, Range 39 East, and running South
420 feet; thence West 210 feet; thence North 420 feet;
thence East 210 feet to point of beginning, said tract
containing two acres more or less, together with the
parcel described as:
From the Northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of
the Northwest quarter, Section 32, Township 31 South,
Range 39 East, run South 210 feet to a point; thence
run West 210 feet to the point of beginning; thence
run West 231 feet; thence run South 780 feet, then run
East 441 feet; thence run North 360 feet; thence run
West 210 feet; thence run North 420 feet to the point
of beginning.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same for a term of Twenty
( 20 ) years from the date hereof.
1. It is understood and agreed by and between the
parties hereto that the above described premises shall be used
exclusively for offices and a child development center for the use
and benefit of the public who desire to use same through Lessee
and that Lessee will make all the necessary improvements on said
property in order to convert the same into offices and a child
development center and will, at its own expense, maintain the same
as such during the term of this Lease.
2. The Lessee agrees not to use or permit the use of
said premises, or any part thereof, for any unlawful purpose or
offensive use, and further agrees that the same shall be used
solely for the purpose of maintaining and operating the same as
offices and a child development center or other community
services. Lessee agrees that the leased premises will be held
open as a community building which may be used by the community
under reasonable terms and conditions.
3. This Lease shall not be assigned and no part of the
leased premises shall be sublet nor used for any purpose other
than that expressed in this Lease without the express consent of
Lessor. Any public body or other entity which sublets any portion
of the leased premises shall carry insurance as described in
paragraph 7.
MAR' 26 1986 -2- BOOK 63 FtjdM8
, n,�1f o
MAR 6 1986goor Fr 0�
4. In the event of the failure on the part of the
Lessee to comply with any of the terms or conditions of this Lease
on its part made and provided to be performed, the Lessor may,
upon written notice to the Lessee, declare this Lease in default
and, after ninety (90) days of uncorrected default, Lessor may
terminate this Lease.
5. Any and
all improvements
made
by the
Lessee shall
become the property of
the Lessor at the
time
of the
expiration of
this Lease and further
Lessee shall make
no
claim on any of said
improvements.
6.._ Lessor shall reserve to itself the right to let,
lease or allow use of any other portion of the Douglas School
site not leased to Lessee for any public purpose, provided such does
not unduly interfere with the operation of Lessee's operation of
offices and a child development center.
7. Lessee, at Lessee's expense, shall provide and
carry, in addition to fire insurance, liability insurance coverage
in an amount of not less than TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS
($200,000.00) per individual injury, and FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($500,000.00) per occurrence. The Lessor shall be named a
co-insured and copies of said policy mailed to Lessor annually.
8. Lessee agrees to indemnify and hold Lessor harmless
for every and all claims that may arise from Lessee's use of the
demised premises, including court costs and attorney's fees.
9. Lessor agrees, at its own expense, to remove or have
removed an old wooden frame structure on the east side of the
property within 180 days of the date of this Lease.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Lease has been executed in the
name of and on behalf of the Lessor by its Chairman attested by its
Clerk, who have been duly authorized by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County so to do, and on the part of
the Lessee
by its President and
Secretary
who
have been
duly
authorized
by its Board of Directors
so to do,
on
the day and
year
first above written.
-3-
M
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
17 � By: 4=
DON C. SCURLOCK, JR.,
Chairman
ssor
Approved as to firm
and legal suf� e ncy
Bruce 8,-k^tt
Asst. Cc,'v `' 'ev
e
�As to Lessee
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
Attest:
Freda Wright,
"LESSOR"
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC.
Y:- -
President
Attest
Zle
Secretary
"LESSEE" 0/7P
G�
Personally before me, the undersigned officer, author' ed
under the laws of said State and County to administer oaths and ake
acknowledgments, appeared DON C. SCURLOCK, JR. and FREDA IGHT,
known to me to be the Chairman and Clerk, respectively, of the BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, who
acknowledged before me that they executed the within and foregoing
Lease under the authority duly vested in them by the said Board.
WITNESS my hand and eal at Vero Beach,
eah, said County and
State, this day of , 19
NOTARY PBLIC
My Commission expires:
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF,fLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA Amy commisSION EXPIRES JULI, 8 1986
COUNTY OF
Personally before me, the undersigned officer,
authorized under the laws of the State and County last
aforesaid to administer oaths and take acknowledgments,
appeared Alphonso Davis and AWIL P l.Od£,
known to me to be the President and Secretary respectively
of the ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
INC., who acknowledged before me that they executed the
foregoing Lease under the authority duly vested in them by the
said corporation.
9
WITNESS my hand and official sMi;
,�'�i�ti,�.
in the County and State aforesaid, this ay of ,
1986.
Notary Publicy
My Commission Expires:
`.
101aryl Public, State of Florida at Large
W Zommission Expires Aug. 29. 19W
_4
MAS 2 6 196 BOOK 63 P,�1,4640
c�
MAR. 2.6 ` 9 BOOK �
There being no further business, the Board on motion duly
made, seconded and carried, adjourned at 11:40 o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
_-- - _--
Clerk Chairman
62
� r i