Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/11/1986Wednesday, June 11, 1986 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, June 11, 1986, at 9:00 o'clock. A.M. Present were Don C. Scurlock, Jr., Chairman;. Patrick B. Lyons, Vice Chairman; Richard N. Bird; Margaret C. Bowman; and William C. Wodtke, Jr. Also present were L.S. "Tommy" Thomas, Acting County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; and Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk. The.Chairman called the meeting to order, and Commissioner Wodtke led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Commissioner Wodtke requested the addition to today's Agenda of a discussion re tr'onsferring the supervision of the coastline aerial work being done by Cubit Engineering and Abrams Survey over to the Public Works Dept. Commissioner Lyons requested that Item 12-C-2 - Discussion re Draft Ordinance Setting Up Proposed Library Advisory Board - be deleted as it has not been before the present Advisory Board as yet. ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously added and deleted the above items from today's Agenda. ': JUN 111986 BOOK' FMa6 PIP" - JUN 111986 APPROVAL OF MINUTES BOOK 64- TherChairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 14, 1986. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 5/14/86, as written. The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 5/21/86. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 5/21/86, as written. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of a New Application to Carry a Concealed Firearm The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/22/86: TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: May 22, 1986 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners SUBJECT: PISTOL PERMIT - NEW FROM: Michael Wright REFERENCES: County Administrator The following person has applied through the Clerk's office for a new pistol permit: Richard Albert Robinson All requirements of the ordinance have been met and are in order. Oa ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved an application to carry a concealed firearm for Richard Albert Robinson. B. Approval for Out -of -County Travel - Liz Forlani to attend Florida Women in Government Seminar ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved out -of -county travel for Administrative Aide Liz Forlani to attend the Florida Women in Government Seminar in Jacksonville, Florida, June 25-28, 1986. C. Release of Letter of Credit for Shorelands Subdivision The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/2/86: TO: The Honorable Members DATE: June 2, 1986 FILE: of the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: RELEASE OF LETTER OF ' CREDIT FOR SIiORELANDS Obert M. Keatin , Al,;;— SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION Director, Planning & Development Through: Michael K. Miller/4M Chief, Current Development Stan Boling Shorelands FROM: Staff Planner 4 • REFERENCES: IBMIRD It is requested a e data herein presented e given torma.L consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of June 11, 1986. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: On January 15, 1986 the Board extended by resolution a contract with Shoreland Development, Inc. for the construction of a dune crossover in Shorelands subdivision. To guarantee construction, Shoreland Development posted an irrevocable letter of credit ( Barnett Bank No 151) in the amount of $8,625.00 now held by the County. Roger Wheelwright, president of Shoreland Development, is . now requesting release of the letter of credit to Barnett Bank. ANALYSIS: The Public Works department has now verified that the dune cross- over has been constructed in accordance with approved plans. Therefore, the terms 'of the contract to construct the required dune crossover have been satisfied and the letter of credit may now be released. 3 JUN 111986 BOOK 64 FAG)E665 J UN 111988 BOOK 64 FADE 666 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners release the Barnett Bank irrevocable letter of credit No. 151 in the amount of $8,625.00 to Barnett Bank. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously released an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $8,625.00 to Barnett Bank for construction of a dune crossover in Shorelands Subdivision, as recommended by staff. D. DER/Army Corps/DNR Permit Application - Idlwyld Corp., Inc. - Castaway Cove Subdivision The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/2/86: TO. Honorable Members DATE: June 2, 1986 FILE: of the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: D.E.R., ARMY CORPS AND _D.N.R. PERMIT APPLICA- • SUBJECT: TIONS Obert M. Keating, AICP Planning & Development-'birector FROM: Art Challacombe REFERENCES: Idlwyld Chief, Environmental Planning DIS:ARTCHA It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of June 11, 1986. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION APPLICATION FILE NO.S 31-120601-4, 31-120597-4, 31-120598-4, 31-120600-4, & 31-120602-4 Applicant: IDLWYLD CORP. INC., P.O. Box 1117, Vero Beach, Florida, 32961. Waterway & Location: The projects are located in the Indian River in Castaway Cove Subdivision, adjacent to Lots 52, 53, 54, 55, & 65, Section 31, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida. The upland property associated with the project is located in the City of Vero Beach. 4 Work & Purpose: The applicant proposes to construct private single 4' x 40' marginal docks with 30' x 81• observation decks (500 square feet) for each of the aforementioned lots. No sewage pump -out or fueling facilities are proposed. No dredging or filling will be performed. ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: The Planning and Development Division reviews and submits comments on dredge and fill applications to the permitting agencies based upon the following: The Conservation & Coastal Zoning Management Element of the Indian River Comprehensive Plan - Coastal Zone Management, Interim Goals, Objectives & Policies for the Treasure Coast Region The Hutchinson Island Planning & Management Plan The Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances All of the five projects are located in the City of Vero Beach. Therefore, the focus of staff review is on potential County and regional impacts rather than site-specific impacts; in-depth field inspections of the project sites were not. conducted. Chapter 16Q-20 of the Florida Administrative Code sets para- meters for private residential single docks located in the Indian River Aquatic Preserve. Section 16Q -20.04(5)(b), Florida Administrative Code, sets forth specific design stan- dards and criteria for private single docks. Although the extent of any impacts are not fully known at this time, there may be cumulative impacts of these and other dockage projects proposed to be constructed along the Indian, River upon the Florida Manatee. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to forward the following comments regarding these projects to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation: 1) The Department of Environmental REgulation and other appropriate agencies should coordinate with the D.N.R. to determine if the proposed projects are located in the Indian River Aquatic Preserve and therefore subject to requirements of Chapter 16Q-20, Florida Administrative Code; 2) The Department of Environmental Regulation and other appropriate agencies should consider the potential cumula- tive impacts of dockage projects upon the Florida Manatee; 3) The Department of Environmental Regulation and other appropriate agencies should evaluate the potential impact of marina projects on ecologically significant- submerged bottomlands such as seagrass beds in the Indian River. 5 BOOK 64 PACE 667 0 JUN 111986 saox 64 FAcr668 ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously authorized staff to forward the comments listed in the above memo to the DER. E. DER/Army Corps/DNR Permit Application - E. B. McLaughlin - John's Island Sound The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/2/86: TO: The Honorable Members DATE: June 2, 1986 FELE: of the Board of County Commissioners DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: D.E.R., ARMY CORPS AND D.N.R. PERMIT APPLICA- SUBJECT: TIONS Obert M. Keating, AI Planning & Development Director �s FROM: Art Challacombe REFERENCES: John's Isl. Chief, Environmental Planning DIS:ARTCHA It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of June 11, 1986. D.E.R. DREDGE & FILL PERMIT APPLICATION FILE NO. 31-120657-4 APPLICANT: E. B. McLaughlin WATERWAY & LOCATION: Indian River (John's Island Sound), Section 12, Township 32S, Range 39E, 101 Dove Plum Rd, Indian River Shores WORK & PURPOSE: The applicant proposes to construct a 328 square foot private residential dock structure in John's Island Sound. One_hundred-sixty square feet of the dock structure will be used as a platform. ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS: The Planning and Development Division reviews and submits comments on dredge and fill applications to the permitting agencies based upon the following: The Conservation & Coastal Zoning Management Element of the Indian River Comprehensive Plan Coastal Zone Management Policies for the Treasure Interim Goals ast Reqion Objectives & The Hutchinson Island Planning & Management Plan The Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances 6 � r r The project is located in the Town of Indian River Shores. Therefore, the focus of staff review is on potential County and regional impacts rather than site-specific impacts; in-depth field inspections of the project sites were not conducted. Staff has not determined if the proposed dockage project location is in the Aquatic Preserve or if it is to be located on privately owned bottomlands. Since the project is located within the Town, the staff has not determined the extent to which the submerged bottomlands or the proposed project areas will be impacted; however, the effect of Indian River development on ecologically valuable seagrass beds should be considered. Although the extent of any impacts are not fully known at this time, there may be cumulative impacts of this and other dockage projects proposed to be constructed along the Indian River upon the Florida Manatee. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to forward the following comments regarding this project to the Florida Department of Environmental Regula tion: 1) The Department of Environmental Regulation and other appropriate agencies should coordinate with the D.N.R. to determine if the proposed project is located in the Indian River Aquatic Preserve and therefore subject to require- ments of Chapter 16Q-20, Florida Administrative Code; 2). The Department of Environmental Regulation and other appropriate agencies should consider the potential cumula- tive impacts of the dockage project upon the Florida Manatee; 3) The Department of Environmental Regulation and other appropriate agencies should evaluate the potential impact of the project on ecologically significant submerged bottomlands such as seagrass beds in the Indian River. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously authorized staff to forward the comments listed in the above memo to the DER. F. Release of Assessment Liens - Vista Properties of Vero Beach, Inc. - Vista Plantation ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously released one ERU SR -60 water assessment lien and one ERU SR -60 sewer assessment lien to Vista Properties of Vero Beach, Inc. for Unit 206, Building 24 of Vista Plantation in the amounts of $970.45 and $1225 respectively. ASSESSMENT LIENS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 7 JUN 111986 BOOK 64 mu 669 L_ SUN 196Book 64 Ff, t 670 PRESENTATION OF STATUE OF LIBERTY FLAG TO COUNTY COMMISSION Don Long and Ed Lohman of American Legion Post #39 presented the Statue of Liberty Flag to the County Commission to commemorate the 100th birthday of the Statue of Liberty to be celebrated nation-wide on July 4, 1986. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously accepted the Statue of Liberty Flag from representatives of the American. Legion Post and authorized the purchase of an additional flag in the amount of $22; the flags to be displayed in the County Commission Chambers and the County Courthouse. DISCUSSION RE REGULATION CHANGES IN ST. JOHNS RIVER MARSH TYPE II WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/23/86: '•••BT. JOMNs RIVER y r. Henry Dean. Executive Director WATER Mildred G. Horton. Deputy Executive Director MANAGEMENT POST OFFICE BOX 1429 • PALATKA, FLORIDA 32078-1429 DISTRICT 9o4r328.8321 6> May 23, 1986 ,,:• c Mr. Don C. Scurlock, Chairman;p�Qr,, Indian River County �> �w ��GS��4� Board of County Commissioners', V�'N' , 1840 25th Street �J Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Commissioner Scurlock: 20 -962 -OPS -30-24 DISTRIBUTION LIST Commissioners Administrator Attorney _ Personnel _ Pubiic Works Community Dev. Utilities _-- Finance 1 - Other The St. Johns River Water Management District at its regular monthly Governing Board meeting on May 13, 1986, approved District staff recommenda- tions for regulation changes in the St. Johns River Marsh Type II Wildlife Management Area. Usually on an annual basis, the District conducts a public meeting to invite comment on various proposed regulation changes to the Type II Wildlife Management Area. The proposed changes are then presented to our Governing Board for approval prior to submission to the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (the Commission) for adoption. 8 The following proposed regulation applies to our Lake Miami Ranch property, located approximately five (5) miles south of Fellsmere, Florida on the west side and fronting County Road 512. PROPOSED REGULATION - Recommendation to prohibit the use of airboats and power boats inside the Lake Miami Ranch property; and to confine the use of water - craft inside the ranch property to canoes and small kicker boats equipped with ten (10) horse power motors or less. RATIONALE - Current conditions on the property, primarily improvements from prior farming operations, pose a danger to the operation of these craft until such time as the District has had the opportunity to secure the property. The Commission advised us that a regulation such as this is not wildlife related and should be presented to the respective Board of County Commissioners for consideration and comment. It is for this reason that the St. Johns River Water Management District would like to incorporate the power boat limitation on Lake Miami Ranch in our regulations beginning this fall, 1986. I look forward to your reply regarding this proposal, and appreciate the County's time in consideration. Sincerely, ( j I ROYie LIMA, Land Manager Off of Land Acquisition Commissioner Bird explained that when the St. Johns River Water Management District took over the Garcia Ranch (Lake Miami Ranch), they did so with the intent of flooding it and making it a part of their water control project, but there are many fences, buildings and structures remaining which could be hazardous to boats after the land its flooded. They are in the process of receiving bids now to remove these obstacles and they are asking that it be closed to the public until October 1, 1986 while the property is being cleared. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, that the Board accept the Water District's recommendation for the closing of the Garcia Ranch during the removal of fences and other structures and urge them to complete their project as soon as possible so that the area can be reopened to public recreation by October 1, 1986. 9 JUN 111986 Boa 64 ma 671 L JUN 111986 BOOK 64 Fact 672 Under discussion, Administrator Thomas explained that many people are unaware of what it means to be Class I or II. Both of these classifications, however, are under the jurisdiction of the Game and Fresh Water Commission which controls the hunting seasons, etc. While serving on the District's Recreation Advisory Committee, he and Commissioner Bird have received nothing but cooperation from Henry Dean, the current executive director. Commissioner Bird reported that the Water District has even offered to the County anything out there that could be of any value, and Chairman Scurlock believed a fence line was salvaged for one of the youth ranches in the county. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion was voted on and carried unanimously. REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL SPECIAL EXCEPTION FROM TURNER BUILDERS FOR LOCATION OF A CHILD CARE FACILITY The hour of 9:10 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to wit: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach In Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being in the matter of e1,1 j!:�aZC In the /y� Court, was pub. lished In said newspaper in the issues of /_/Qr(1 s T /nc� Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at A public tdMnp at wfdd pier in k" Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore M atltnu 00 hwe N b 4 been continuously published in said Milian River County, Florida, each daily and has been fdr0'wBMIdW �� Conli entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Intlian River Court• ===1.V1cf�A ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of ir�Uon hada b taro Bbul.� advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm V. aq on Wgdray, Jun 11; or Corporahon any discount, rebate. commission or refund for the purpose of securingthis ltfaaneaea�e. advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. =_b. fc �'c MOn L WOWS thin Nraem ra— of the Voc Sworn to and subscribed before me this d °ou°ppwn�on Valudw wo�a�bow- ' wo o"p Pay of L' A.D. 19 tlr� IWDIAN RlivER CCUNttrm be bur. BOARD OF COUNTY COAaBi;lbOlERB u iness a BY: Don C. Sawtocl, Jt . 1 ��g yy�M t f..(; �IJ �e11 17 (SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River Coun , Florida) 10 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/19/86: TO:The Honorable Members of DATE: May 19, 1986 FILE: the Board of County Commissioners TURNER BUILDERS REQUEST DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: FOR THE GRANTING OF CONCEPTUAL SPECIAL %� d SUBJECT: EXCEPTION APPROVAL FOR Robert 'e� ing v ICP THE LOCATION OF A CHILD Planning & Development Director CARE FACILITY THROUGH: Michael K. Miller 4M Chief, Current Development FROM: David C Nearing REFERENCES: Turner Builders Staff Planner X"eO DAVE It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular.meeting of June 11, 1986. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND LOCATION Judy Turner has submitted a site plan application to construct a child care center. Due to the fact that the property is in the RS -6, Single -Family zoning district, the child care center is considered a special exception use and must go through the special exception approval process. The subject property is located on - the southeast corner of 12th Street and 20th Avenue. The applicant will provide care for a maximum of 79 children and the hours of operation will be from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Pursuant to Section 25.3 of the Zoning Code, Regulation of Special Exception Uses, the Board of County Commissioners is to consider the appropriateness of the requested use based on the submitted site plan and the suitability of the site for that use. The County may attach any conditions and safeguards necessary to_ assure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area. On May 8, 1986 the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny the request for conceptual special exception approval. The Commissioners were concerned with the effect of increased traffic attracted to the site in relation to pedestrian and motorist safety at the inter- section of 20th Avenue and 12th Street, as well as the facility's impact upon the traffic load of the intersection. Another area of concern involved increased noise generated by activities on the site and possible negative impacts on surrounding property owners. ANALYSIS 1. Property Size: 22,917 sq. ft. 2. Zoning Classification: RS -6, Residential Single Family Zoning District (up to 6 units/acre) 3. Land Use Designation: LD -2, Low Density Residential (allow- ing up to 6 units/acre) 4. Building Area: 3,202 sq. ft. 11 L.' JUN 111986 BOOK 64 PA. E 673 JUN 111986 L BOOK 64 F,1-IH67 5. Internal Traffic Circulation: A one-way loop driveway provides access from 20th Avenue. In order to bring 12th Street into conformance with its status as a primary col- lector, the applicant will dedicate the northern 10 feet of the,site Ito the County for R.O.W. purposes. A 4' wide public sidewalk is required for all developments in the RS -6 zoning district. The cost of the sidewalk could be escrowed since sidewalks do not abut the property and a bikeway is developed on the other side of 12th Street. Upon examination of the intersection of 20th Avenue (Secon- dary Collector) and 12th Street (Primary Collector), the County Traffic Engineer determined that the morning peak hour traffic flow is at a level of service "A", i.e., free flowing traffic, little or no restrictions to maneuverability, able to maintain desired rate of speed. The peak hour traffic flow for noon hour traffic is at a level of service "B", i.e., stable traffic flow, limited restriction to traffic speed and maneuverability. The increased traffic attraction caused by the proposed use should not cause a substantial.' overburdening of existing intersection capacity. 6. Off-street Parking Spaces Required: 6 Provided: 6, 7. Drainage Plan: The conceptual drainage plan has received approval by the Public Works Department. 8. Landscape Plan: The proposed conceptual landscape plan is in conformance with Ordinance #84-47. 9. Utilities: The project will -connect to the public water system and utilize an on-site septic system. 10. Surrounding Land Uses: North: Vero Beach Elementary School South: Single family residential East: Single family residential West: Single family residential 11. Ordinance requirements for child care facilities [Sec. 25.1 (f) (1) ] . a) Location on a paved public road near a major thoroughfare. b) Special passenger loading/unloading facilities. c) State of Florida regulations governing child care facilities. d) Adequate active play yard containing 2,000 sq. ft. for the first 20 children plus an additional 150 sq. ft per each additional child over 20. e) A solid wall or fence five feet in height along the rear and side property lines adjoining residential zoned property. Section 25.1 of the Zoning Code, Regulations for Specific Land Uses, details specific criteria to be considered when reviewing a child care center as a special exception use. All criteria, including adequate outdoor play area and screening requirements have been met. The special exception process allows the Board of County Commissioners to impose any additional conditions to ensure compatibility of the proposed use with surrounding property. In this case, the staff recommends that the site be screened by a masonry wall to reduce any potentially adverse impact on surrounding properties which may be caused by noise generated on site in the play yard. If conceptual special exception approval is obtained, a major site plan conforming to all site plan requirements is required to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the usual manner. 12 _ M M RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend denial of this request for the reasons cited in the proposed development and location section of this memorandum. Despite the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation for denial, staff feels that a child care facility would be an appropriate use for this site, and staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1 The applicant shall obtain site plan approval which complies with all requirements set forth in Sec. 23.1 Site Plan Review and Approval Procedures, Sec. 25.1(f)(1) Requirements for Child Care Facilities, and all applicable regulations for the RS -6 zoning district. 2. A 5 foot high masonry wall shall be located along the rear and side property lines. Robert Keating, Director of Planning & Development, showed an aerial view of the proposed corner site and a copy of the conceptual site plan for the proposed child care facility. He pointed out that when the Zoning Code was revised last year, substantial amount of work was done on special exception and administrative permit uses, and staff feels that this commercial use does not lend itself to commercial areas, such as the U.S. #1 corridor. Further, if this use is approved for a residential area, the Board can attach more conditions and we would have more control. Chairman Scurlock noted that when he taught school he handled bus duty and felt that particular intersection would be a very inappropriate place to drop off and pick up children. Before he could vote for special exception, he would have to see far more proof that the traffic situation could be mitigated somehow. Commissioner Bird was concerned about traffic coming into the intersection from the north as there are 3 lanes and only one lane going south. With the facility being right on the corner, it would create a stacking condition, possibly right up to the light. Chairman Scurlock emphasized that the child care center at the intersection of 27th Avenue and 20th Street creates a stacking problem even with a 4 -lane divided roadway. 13 JUN 111986 BOOK 64 FADE 675 JUN 111986 BOOK 64 F,� JF. 676 Commissioner Wodtke asked how far that ingress and egress is from the canal right-of-way, and Judy Turner of Turner Builders advised that she has a survey showing that right of way to be 60 feet. She pointed out that the County paid a lot of money for the engineering study done by Barton-Ashmann, which classified that intersection as Traffic Level A, the least trafficked category. The child care facility has been under study for the last two years and will accommodate 79 children. It is assumed that the children will come from areas to the south; the facility is designed to pick up children from Indian River Heights, Oslo, Laurelwood and other children of parents driving north to work. L! They have designed a residential structure to blend with the residential area, and of the 150 people in the surrounding area who have signed a petition objecting to this location for the child care center, only the Johnstons to the east have asked to see the actual site plan, and they agreed that it is everything that we said it would be. She felt that the Hansons to the south need to be protected as they have a common boundary, and stated that the owners of the proposed facility are flexible as to what kind of fence should be constructed. The structure is one-third again as large as it needs to be for 79 children and the children will only be on the playground for 2-4 hours a day. Mrs. Turner did not feel that just driving by the intersection was a fair way to tell how busy it would become. She reported that the State Legislature had recently passed House Bill 782 entitled, "An Act Relating to Child Care" exempting such homes from certain local zoning regulations. In Section 3 of the bill, it specifically states: "The operation of a residence as a family day care home as defined by law, registered or licensed with Health & Rehabilitative Services, shall constitute a valid residential use for purposes of local zoning regulations and no such regulations shall require the owner or operator of such family day care home to obtain any special exemption or use, permit or waiver or to 14 pay any special fee in excess of $50 to operate in areas zoned residential use." This bill becomes effective in October, 1986. Chairman Scurlock remained convinced that the increased traffic and stacking conditions are the main problems, not the residential use. He pointed out that the traffic engineering consultant agrees that expansion will be forthcoming and that 20th Avenue will be 4-laned in the future. Whether the traffic level is classified as Level A or B is not the question; the question is how well traffic moves through that intersection. Chairman Scurlock opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Standish Crews, 1135 20th Avenue, reported that at peak times during school hours the northbound lane backs up to his south lot line, which is 500 feet from the corner. Traffic has increased and there have been serious accidents -at this corner. Recently, a car went into the yard across the street from them. He felt another 50-70 cars coming in twice a day would create more havoc than they already have at that corner. Attorney Christopher Marine, of Gould, Cooksey, Fennell, Appleby, Barkett & O'Neill, appeared representing many property owners in the vicinity who are opposed to this project and urged the Board to deny this special exception approval. He explained that many of those inlopposition to the child care facility attended the Planning & Zoning hearing on this matter but could not be here this morning because they had to go to work. He submitted a petition signed by 142 people in opposition to the child care center being located at this intersection. SAID PETITIONS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Attorney Marine believed that an institutional use is much closer to a commercial use and is not appropriate in an RS -6 zoning district. A child care facility is allowed in unique circumstances, but the Code says it has to be compatible with 15 BOGS 64 FADE 677 r JUN 111986 1 BOOK 4 surrounding land uses. Attorney Marine maintained that the ingress and egress problem, the increased traffic at the inter- section, the noise from the playground, and the lack of need for another child care center prove that the proposed facility is not' suitable for this particular location. In conclusion, he urged the Board to take all these things into consideration in arriving at their decision. Hazel Crews, 1135 20th Avenue, a resident of 30 years, stated that they had taken a traffic count during the morning hours of 7-9 o'clock on May 27th, and during that two-hour period there was not a time when traffic was not stacked at the inter- section. In fact, there were many times when traffic reached well below her driveway which is 400 feet south of the inter- section. She pointed out that the bike path along there is separated from the road by only 15-20" of grass. The children riding their bikes to Citrus Elementary.and the high school cross the intersection in front of her property, which is another dangerous situation. Where there is a little "s" in the road, people are running off the road and hitting the guy wire there. She believed it was much too dangerous to have an additional 50-70 cars coming and going twice a day. When you take off the canal right-of-way, she felt the property is very small for such a large enterprise. The owners to the east and south have been asked by the owners of the proposed facility if they would be willing to sell. their property so that the school could expand. If the traffic and the noise become unbearable in the future, the child care center would be their only prospect if they decided to sell. Mrs. Crews noted that many residents have to go south before going north, and realize just how congested that intersection is. Bill Hanson, 1165 20th Avenue, owner of the property to the south of the proposed day care center, pointed out that commercial property is available just a little further east, but commercial property is much more expensive as a rule. He advised 16 that he has talked to the owners of three day care centers in that general area who said that they are operating under capacity, and he, therefore, believed that not only was the child care center not wanted, it was not needed. Mrs. Turner argued that there was a need for a day care center in this area, and pointed out that enrollment usually drops in the summer months. She felt that the section of the ordinance which requires day care centers to be located on an arterial road should be amended, but Commissioner Lyons emphasized that the main problem is that they are too close to the intersection. He felt that although they have a fine looking project, it is in the wrong place. Louise Roberts, 1705 18th Avenue, stated that she has been a day care teacher in the area for 11 years and is very familiar with drop off and pick up patterns. She pointed out that an enrollment of 79 children would generate approximately 50 vehicles coming and going twice a day and believed there is just no way to mitigate this problem. Tabi Johnston, 1925 12th Street, owner of the residence right next door to the proposed facility, stressed that she would not allow her two children to walk through this intersection on their way to school if this day care center goes in. Richard Hassell; 1150 20th Avenue, noted that he and his wife can hear the football games and the marching band at the high school in addition to the children playing on the grounds of Citrus Elementary School. With all that noise, they certainly do not appreciate having more right next door. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Wodtke felt sure that the traffic study did not anticipate the impact of 50-60 cars traveling twice a day to just 17 JUN 11 1986 Boox 64 FnIJE67 JUIN 111986 BOOK 64 FAct 68® one residential piece of property, and believed that the resulting congestion would make this an inappropriate location for a child care facility. He further believed that the County would have to 4 -lane 20th Avenue from 8th Street to 12th Street at some point in the future and hoped the residents would cooperate in that project when the time comes. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously denied the request by Turner Builders for special exception approval of the location of a child care facility at 20th Avenue and 12th Street. WEST COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT DISPOSAL FEASIBILITY STUDY The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/30/86: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: MAY 30, 1986 THRU: L.S. THOMAS ACTING ADMINISTRATOR VIA: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR, UTILITY S RVICES FROM: RONALD R. BROOKS ENVIRONMENTAL EN INEERING SPECIALIST SUBJECT: WEST COUNTY REGIONAL WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT DISPOSAL FEASIBILITY STUDY BACKGROUND In December of 1985 the Board of County Commissioners authorized the engineering firm, Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., to perform a feasi- bility study on effluent disposal alternatives for the County's west regional wastewater treatment plant. The feasibility study was necessary because there were concerns as to the adequacy of the plant site for disposal of anticipated future wastewater flows. In addition, numerous existing wastewater systems along the state road 60 corridor were wanting to tie into the plant thereby necessitating an expansion of the plant and effluent disposal system much sooner than had been anticipated. Exhibit I is a copy of the completed feasibility report. In the report you may note that additional effluent disposal sites will be necessary to accomodate flows from future development as well as flows from existing facilities that will be connecting to the County system. 18 ANALYSIS The report specifically addresses the following types of effluent storage and disposal along with there costs: 1. Effluent reuse by irrigation 2. Effluent storage/infiltration basins 3. Effluent storage/lined holding basins 4. Rapid rate infiltration basins 5 Deep well injection The present effluent disposal system consists of 3 rapid rate infiltration basins. These basins will not be adequate, and even with the construction of additional infiltration basins the plant site does not appear to be large enough to accommodate the anticipated wastewater flows of the near future. CONCLUSION In the conclusion of the feasibility study it is basically recom- mended that the County pursue effluent reuse through irrigation along with a backup storage capability utilizing lined storage basins. The reuse plan is the least expensive and the most attractive to the environmental and water use regulatory agencies. The reuse program would consist of the purchase of the sod farm located adjacent to the wastewater treatment plant to provide a large tract of land that would provide a continuous county con- trolled effluent disposal site. In addition, it is recommended that agreements be pursued with nearby agricultural (citrus) and golf course interests to provide irrigation as needed by those interests. Through these agreements effluent would be utilized for agricultural and golf course irrigation when needed and alternately disposed of or stored on County controlled property when not needed. On page 7-8 of the feasibility study the following courses of action are recommended to implement the reuse program.' I. Commence negotiations for irrigation contracts with landowners of the properties that the study recommends for use as irrigation sites in the initial two phases of the reuse program. 2. Perform hydrogeologic modeling of effluent disposal system to determine impacts. 3. Perform detailed site-specific studies for the proposed application areas. 4. Perform detailed survey of exisiting potable water systems that will be impacted by disposal systems. 5. Commence with design/permitting of recommended disposal system. RECOMMENDATION Operation of the west regional wastewater treatment plant has only recently begun and the present flows are already in excess of 100,000 gallons per day. With the limited effluent disposal capa- city of the existing rapid infiltration basins it is imperative that we immediately pursue additional and alternative means of effluent disposal to provide service to new development and those develop- ments that need to phase out their problematic wastewater treatment plants. 19 JUN 111986 BOOK 64 6S I I JUN 111986 BOOK 64 fA E 689 Staff therefore recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the following: 1. Pursue immediate negotiations for purchase of the sod farm located adjacent to, and west of, the west regional wastewater treatment plant. This property would be used as a County controlled irrigation area to accommodate effluent disposal or storage when the use of effluent for irrigating golf courses or agricultural properties is unfeasible due to climatic condi- tions or other reasons. The sod farm could continue to func- tion in its present use. 2. Actively pursue negotiations with the property owners of those agricultural and proposed golf course properties that are recommended for irrigation sites in the first and second phase of the proposed effluent reuse program. -_. Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that since we started the project, there has been a heavy demand from people who want to tie into the system which has quickly grown to 6,000 units. In addition, staff is considering adding the mobile home parks along SR -60. It was not anticipated that the growth would happen this soon and the DER is now requiring us to go out and acquire more acreage for effluent disposal. The 80 -acre plant site will handle some of the effluent disposal as the plant takes up only 20 acres. Eventually, however, we will need several hundred acres for effluent disposal. The sod farm adjacent to the plant site would be perfect for effluent disposal, but it will not meet our total needs. Staff is suggesting that we proceed with negotiations for the 160 -acre sod farm. Two of the options to be considered are buying it and Leasing it back to the sod farm or buying it and running the sod farm ourselves. He pointed out that the sod farm would also serve to handle sludge disposal. We are also considering leasing grove areas west of 1-95 for effluent disposal. Director Pinto requested authorization to negotiate the various scenarios of purchasing or leasing the sod farm and actively begin negotiations with the various golf courses for effluent disposal. Everything we are going to do is funded 20 00 through impact fees and that will be the limiting factor as to how far we go. Director Pinto explained that they are not asking to purchase anything today, but it is important for the Board to know who they are going to talk to and what figures, etc. They will come back to the Board with a recommendation. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, that the Board approve staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo dated 5/30/86. Commissioner Bowman asked how long a sod farm can be operated when 2" of top soil is taken off with each harvest, and Director Pinto explained that only 1/2" or less is taken off at a time and that is where the sludge will come into play. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion was voted on and carried unanimously. Administrator Thomas advised that he and Director Pinto have been putting together a team which includes the University of Florida Experimental'Station, the County Utilities engineers, Steve Futch from the local Agricultural Dept., and several agricultural users. They have had several meetings and their aim is three -fold: 1) To use effluent from the plant. 2) To find proper agricultural uses for effluent. They are progressing on this very well, especially with citrus. Sod farms and pasture use are pretty well established uses. 3) To pursue this so that there will be no further need to put effluent into the Indian River. PROPOSED WEST COUNTY SCHOOL- UTILITIES The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/2/86: 21 BOOK 64 F',u,-L 6S JUN 111986 BOOK 64 eF1;t 6S4 -------- TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE=RS DATE: JUNE 2, 1986 THRU: L.S. THOMAS ACTING ADMINISTRATOR VIA: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR., UTILITY SERVI S FROM: JEFFREY A. BOONE, ENGINEERING OPERATI NS MANAGER, DIVISION OF UTILITY SERVICES 4Q. SUBJECT: WEST COUNTY SCHOOL - CITY OF VERO BEACH BACKGROUND The proposed West County School is to be located on 8th Street west of 43rd Avenue. To most economically serve utilities to the facility, a joint effort between Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach will be required. ANAI YC I C County Utilities has an 18 inch water main along 8th Street with which water service will be provided. The County has no wastewater collection system in the area at this time, although the City of Vero Beach can provide wastewa service with the construction of an onsite lift station and force main to',.. existing manhole just east of 43rd Avenue, as depicted on the attached aerial. As the County's wastewater collection system is expanded into this area, the school will be required to abandon connection to the City of Vero Beach wastewater system and connect to the County's wastewater system and pay all required connection and impact fees. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve servicing water and wastewater to the proposed West County School on a cooperative basis as outlined above, until County wastewater service is available. Director Pinto reported that the School Board has asked if the County Utilities Department has any objection to the proposed west county school receiving temporary wastewater service from the City of Vero Beach. In talking to the Planning Department, he found that they have not been advised of the site plan for the new school as yet, and while Utilities does not have any objection, we certainly will not circumvent this issue going through the Planning Dept. He asked for the Board's authorization to reply to the School Board that we will address this issue when it goes through Planning 8 Zoning. Chairman Scurlock advised that under the new State requirements the school boards are required to coordinate their capital improvement programs with the county planning 22 r departments, and Indian River County requires them to go through the site plan process. We have indicated to them through various staff and administrative meetings that we may modify our approach in that the School Board being an elected board, may want to present its site plan directly to the Board of County Commissioners. However, we are not waiving the requirement to submit a site plan He anticipated that at the eleventh hour before the school is scheduled to opened, the School Board will be here saying that they don't have water, sewer, traffic lights, and then the pressure will be on this Board to do something in a hurry. The Chairman felt we need to communicate way up front that this Commission is taking a very strong position that the School Board will go through the proper planning process or they will not be allowed to build the school. Commissioner Lyons asked if it would be enough to say that we approve in concept the service to the school while waiting for the final details, but Chairman Scurlock wished to write a letter putting the School Board on notice that the site plan process is going to be followed. ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously authorized the Chairma'h to communicate to the School Board that we do approve in concept the arrangements for handling the wastewater on a cooperative basis with the County and the City of Vero Beach and ask that they submit to us a preliminary site plan for roads, water, and traffic signals as soon as possible so that we can do the necessary joint planning. Commissioner Bowman suggested that a copy of the letter be sent to the Superintendent of Schools and members of the School Boa rd. 23 BOOK 64 FinaL M JUN 111986 J JUN 11 1986 BOOK 64 ol.)E 686 REMOVAL OF ROCKS IN LANDFILL BORROW PIT The•Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/2/86: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JUNE 2, 1986 THRU: L. S. THOMAS ACTING ADMINISTRATOR VIA: TERRANCE G. PINT DIRECTOR, UTILITY SERVICES FROM: RONALD R. BROOKS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SPECIALIST SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF ROCKS IN LANDFILL BORROW PIT A, BACKGROUND The landfill operations include removal of soil material from a borrow pit to cover the waste material that is received. Soil material has generally been removed and transported to the waste dump areas by use of a vehicle called a "Pan". We have encountered a layer of rock within the borrow pit that varies in depth of 1 - 4 feet and covers approximately 70% of the surface area of the pit, thereby, restricting the use of the "Pan" for removal of soil material. In addition, the rock layer is so hard that use of all available landfill equipment has proven to be futile in attempting to remove the rock and has only resulted in damage to the equipment. The Road and Bridge Department has inspected the site and has determined that they also do not have any equipment that is capable of removing the rock layer. Throuah observations by equipment leasing representatives and personnel• from the Landfill and Road and Bridge Departments, it has been determined that the quickest and possibly least expensive means of removing the rock layer is to lease a large D8K tractor with a blade and hydraulic ripper. The work would take approximately two weeks and would be performed by County personnel. Since the rock I-ayer is severly restricting the excavation of soil material for covering the incoming waste material it is necessary that the equipment needed to remove the material be leased as soon as possible. The following equipment rental businesses have been contacted for quotations on the leasing of the equipment: 1. Dewind Equipment 2. Florida Georgia Tractor Company 3. Moody Equipment 4. Kelly Tractor 5. Ring Power Corporation 24 l RECOMMENDATION In conclusion, a D8K tractor with a blade and hydraulic ripper would have to be leased for no less than a month and the lease price and travel costs through the various companies will vary from $10,000.00/month to $13,200.00/month. In as much as it is necessary to remove the layer and the least expensive means appears to be by leasing the needed equipment, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to pursue the leasinq of a D8K tractor with a blade and hydraulic ripper from one of the above companies that has the equipment available at the most reasonable cost, but not to exceed $13,000.00/month. Commissioner Lyons asked if staff considered blasting, and Director Pinto advised that they determined that the most cost effective means of removing the rock layer is to lease a_large D&K tractor with a blade and hydraulic ripper. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo dated 6/2/86. Commissioner Bird understood that efforts will be made to utilize this material as best we can throughout the county, and Director Pinto assured him that it will be traded off to other departments. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - MASTELLER 8 MOLER, INC. The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/30/86; 25 JUN 111986 BOOK 64 FAG 6S7 JUN 11 986 BOOK 64 FD:�E USS TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: MAY 30, 1986 THRU: 'TOMMY THOMAS ACTING COUNTY ADM IFSVATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR, UTILITYCES SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. BACKGROUND On April 24, 1985, an agreement for professional services was executed between Sippel, Masteller, Lorenz & Hoover, Inc., and Indian River County. This agreement allowed the consulting engi- neers to provide general consulting and engineering services as needed and authorized from time to time by the County. ANALYSIS It The new agreement shall amend the original professional services agreement by changing the name of the corporation and by amending certain prices for general consulting and engineering services. RECOMMENDATION Utility staff asks the Board of County Commissioners to approve the attached agreement for professional services between Masteller and Moler, Inc., and Indian River County. This recommendation is based on the utility departments complete satisfaction regarding the consultants quality of work and competitive prices. Director Pinto explained that the basic changes in the agreement are the firm's name and the rates shown on Exhibit "A: SCIIEDimr. OF FERS EFFECTIVE' APRIL 1, 1996 HOURLY RA'I'LS FOR TECIINICAL PERSONNEL I. Principal Engineers 2. Project Engineer 3. Staff Engineers 4. Draftsmen REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 1. Travel outside of Indian River County 2. Miscellaneous charges a. long distance telephone or telex b. unusually large Xerox productions C. unusually large blueprint quantities d. special printing 3. Subconsultants a. specialized engineering testing firms b. specialized laboratories C. electronic & instrumentation technician d. surveyors 26 $?O. UO/Hr. $60.UO/Hr. $40.00/'lir. $30.00/I1r. Per 8a(2) At cost At cost Chairman Scurlock understood that Masteller & Moler currently has $250,000 of liability insurance and is now seeking to get $1 -million. Director Pinto felt that the Board might want to consider setting some future policy with regard to what amount of liability we want our consultants to carry. Commissioner Wodtke asked at what point would we consider going back out for rebid after going through the qualifying process, and Director Pinto explained that the reason we look for continuing service contracts is to avoid going through the qualifying process every time there is an emergency. Commissioner Wodtke asked how much we used the consultants during previous contracts., and Director Pinto fel that we used a them a substantial amount -- just on the $9.Z/d roject, it probably ran to $500,0000. We have never used them on an emergency basis. This agreement allows staff to bring it to the Board for approval on a specific project. Chairman Scurlock and Commissioner Wodtke felt that every two years we should go out and advertise for proposals and go through the qualifying process because they could anticipate the need to have another small company on board along with Masteller & Moler and Camp Dresser & McKee. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously approved staff's recommendation and approved the Agreement for Professional Services between Masteller & Moler, Inc. and Indian River County for general consulting and engineering services as needed and authorized from time to time by the County. AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 27 BOOK 64 F�1 r �.99 JUN 111986 JUN 111986 BOOK 64 P,:1- 6�Q GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAMS - VISTA ROYALE, VISTA GARDENS AND GIFFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/2/86: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: JUNE 2, 1986 THRU: L.S. THOMAS ACTING ADMINISTRATOR VIA: TERRANCE G. PINT DIRECTOR, UTILITY VICES FROM: R014ALD R. BROOKS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SPECIALIST SUBJECT: GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAMS VISTA ROYAL, VISTA GARDENS AND GIFFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS 1. BACKGROUND Our wastewater consulting engineers, Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., have recently obtained required DER groundwater monitoring permits for the Vista Royal, Vista Gardens and Gifford wastewater treat- ment plants. These permits require the installation of addition- al groundwater monitoring wells at the Vista Royal and Vista Gardens wastewater treatment plants and the installation of a piezometer well at the Gifford plant. Detailed drawings of the wells along with a breakdown of the soil types and stratigraphy of the well sites must also be prepared and submitted to DER. To insure that DER is satisfied with the design and construction of the monitoring wells, a professional engineer should oversee the .construction of the wells and prepare and sign the as -built drawings and soil stratigraphy of the wells. CONCLUSION Attached* as Exhibit A is a proposal by Camp, Dresser S McKee, Inc., for installation of the required monitoring wells and preparation of the as -built drawings with soil stratigraphy. The proposal addresses only the work needed at the Vista Royal and Vista Gardens plants and does not include the construction of a piezometer well at the Gifford plant. The total cost for the work at the Vista Royal and Vista Gardens plants as outlined in the proposal will be $12,800.00 and it will cover the construction of 4 monitoring wells and preparation of a complete well completion report with detailed as -built drawings. Additional costs for the installation of the piezometer well at Gifford is forthcoming. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Utilities Department to enter into a contract with Camp, Dresser E McKee Inc., for installation of the required monitoring wells as provided in the attached proposal; and further, to negotiate a contract for installation of the single piezometer well for the Gifford waste- water plant. 28 F-1 M "l im Director Pinto explained that the purpose is to monitor any contamination or effect on the ground water by the release of effluent on the mosquito impoundments. Oddly enough, if the effluent was going directly into the Indian River, there would not be a problem with the DER. budgeted operating fund. The funds will come out of the Commissioner Lyons did not understand who is getting protected against what since the mosquito impoundment is next to a large residential development where we have required them to close down all their shallow wells, and Director Pinto said he could argue that point on 70% of the DER requirements. Commissioner Scurlock was amazed that the DER is just sitting still on the issue of using effluent on mosquito impound- ments rather than putting it into the river. They seem to be against any solution to the problem that we have to offer. Director Pinto felt the problem is that the DER sets regulations on a blanket basis for all systems and does not have any flexibility for unique situations. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, that the Board authorize the Utilities Department to enter into a contract with Camp, Dress'br & McKee, Inc., for installation of the required monitoring wells and to negotiate a contract for installation of the single piezometer well for the Gifford wastewater plant, as recommended by staff. Under discussion, Commissioner Bowman suggested inviting the DER down here so that we could educate them to some extent on this matter, but Director Pinto believed that they would just sit here and agree with everything and then place the same requirements into their permit applications. 29 BOOK a 64: F,,t691 JUN 11 1996 BOOK 64 Fifi r 692 110 THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion was voted on and carried unanimously. TRANSFER OF DIRECTION OF AERIAL WORK BY CUBIT ENGINEERING OVER TO'" PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Commissioner Wodtke reported that the Beach Preservation & Restoration Committee feels that the coastline aerial work being performed by Cubit Engineering and Abrams Survey really should be under the authority of Public Works Director Jim Davis instead of the Beach Committee.. That way Director Davis will put it on his punch list and it will be much easier to track from a staff level. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wodtke, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized the transfer of the supervision of the coastline aerial work being performed by Cubit Engineering and Abrams from the Beach Committee to the Public Works Director. APPROVAL OF ORGANIZATION CHART FOR IRC LIBRARY SYSTEM The Board reviewed the following organizational chart dated 5/20/86: 30 U n May 20,1986 'INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD OF COUNTY �+•®.ro� COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD 7 MEMBERS (I EACH DISTRICT AND 2 AT -LARGE) COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM LIBRARY SERVICES COORDINATOR SEBASTIAN AREA LIBRARY DIRECTOR OSLO AREA LIBRARY DIRECTOR VERO BEACH CENTRAL LIBRARY DIRECTOR WEST SIDE AREA LIBRARY DIRECTOR BEACH AREA LIBRARY WABASSO AREA LIBRARY DIRECTOR DIRECTOR 44 Commissioner Lyons recommended approval of the proposed library organization chart. ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the above organization chart for the IRC Library System. Commissioner Lyons planned to ask that the existing Advisory, Board members stay on the Board for two years and at the end of that time, this Board will appoint replacements. 31 JUN 111986 BOOK Fa -,y693 I JUN 111986 BOOK 64 PAGE 6.9 There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded�.and carried, the Board of County Commissioners adjourned at 11:10 o'clock A.M. in order that the District Board of the South County Fire District might convene. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. ATTESI: Clerk 32 - Chairman