HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/16/1986� � r
Tuesday, December 16, 1986
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission
Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday,
1986, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Do -n C. Scurlock, Jr.,
Chairman; Margaret C. Bowman, Vice Chairman; Richard N. Bird;
Carolyn K. Eggert; and Gary C. Wheeler. Also present were
Charles P. Balczun, County Administrator; L. S. "Tommy" Thomas,
Intergovernmental Relations Director; Charles P. Vitunac,
Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; and Virginia
Hargreaves, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
Reverend LaBarre, Trinity Episcopal Church, gave the
invocation, and Commissioner Bowman led the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Chairman Scurlock asked that a summary of the actions of the
Transportation Planning Committee actions be added to today's
agenda under Commissioner Bowman's items and that acceptance of
the Bond for Albert Cochran, Commissioner of the Mosquito Control
District be added to the Consent Agenda.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously added items
to the agenda as described above.
APPROVAL OF_MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or
corrections to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Novem-
ber 25, 1986.
BOOK NU F� ,,A, 40
DEC 161986
_4 -
paragraph, 11$2.7 million" be changed to read 11$2.4 million,"
which he felt was more representative of the actual proceeds of
the bond issue.
Commissioner Wheeler noted that on Page 42, the Motion
should be corrected to read that it was seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler rather than Commissioner Wodtke.
The above corrections having been made, ON MOTION
by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner
Bird, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of November 25, 1986, as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Bowman requested that Item G be removed from
the Consent Agenda for discussion; Chairman Scurlock requested
the removal of Item R; and Commissioner Bird requested the
removal of Item Q.
A. Appointment of Deputy Sheriff
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved the
appointment of Deputy Sheriff Richard R. Hill by
Sheriff Dobeck.
B. - C - D. Reports -
The following were received and placed on.file in the Office
of the Clerk:
Report of Audit of the Office of Public Defender, 19th
Judicial Circuit,,FY ended June 30, 1986.
Report of Traffic Violation Bureau, Special Trust Fund,
November, 1986 - $37,926.01.
Month to Date report of Traffic Violations for November,
1986, by last name.
2
BOOK 66
641
Commissioner Bird requested
that on Page 47, fourth
paragraph, 11$2.7 million" be changed to read 11$2.4 million,"
which he felt was more representative of the actual proceeds of
the bond issue.
Commissioner Wheeler noted that on Page 42, the Motion
should be corrected to read that it was seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler rather than Commissioner Wodtke.
The above corrections having been made, ON MOTION
by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner
Bird, the Board unanimously approved the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of November 25, 1986, as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Bowman requested that Item G be removed from
the Consent Agenda for discussion; Chairman Scurlock requested
the removal of Item R; and Commissioner Bird requested the
removal of Item Q.
A. Appointment of Deputy Sheriff
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved the
appointment of Deputy Sheriff Richard R. Hill by
Sheriff Dobeck.
B. - C - D. Reports -
The following were received and placed on.file in the Office
of the Clerk:
Report of Audit of the Office of Public Defender, 19th
Judicial Circuit,,FY ended June 30, 1986.
Report of Traffic Violation Bureau, Special Trust Fund,
November, 1986 - $37,926.01.
Month to Date report of Traffic Violations for November,
1986, by last name.
2
E. Report of Occupational License Taxes
Report of Tax Collector Morris as to occupational license
taxes collected during November, 1986, was received and placed on
file in the County Commission Office, as follows:
mrmnPdmnitm
TO: Board of County Commissioners -
FROM: Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector
DATE: December 8, 1986
SUBJECT: Occupational Licenses
Pursuant to Indian River County Ordinance No. 86-59, please
be informed that $5,193.03 was collected in occupational
license taxes during the month of November, 1986, representing]
the issuance of 193 occupational licenses.
Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector
F. Bid #322 Two Refuse Container Trucks
The Board reviewed memo of Purchasing Manager Goodrich:
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: Dec. 9, 1986 FILE:
THRU: Joseph A. 'Baird SUBJECT: IRC BID #322 -Two (2)
Director, Budget Office New 1986 or 1987 Refuse
Container Trucks
FROM:d -REFERENCES:
Carolyn.Goodrich, Manager
Purcha ding Department
1. Description and Conditions
Bids were received Thursday, November 20, 1986 at 11:00 A.M.
for IRC #322 -Two (2) New 1986 or 1987 Refuse Container Trucks
for the Refuse Department.
27 Bids were sent out. 24 Bids were received.
2. Alternatives and Analysis
The low bid was submitted by Jim Hardee Equipment Co., Inc.,
Tampa, Fl. in the amount of $61,520.00 each or $123,040.00
for 2 trucks.
The literature included with the bid stated that 3/4" cable is
on the Galbreath U4 unit, and not 7/8" as requested in the
specifications. However, per a phone conversation, with
Mr. McCullers of Jim Hardee Equipment, they did not take exception
and 7/8" cable is included in their bid. Mr. McCullers has
followed up in writing. ..
3
DEC 1 1936 aoo r,,r$
BOOK 66 643
3. Recommendation and Funding
Staff recommends that IRC #322 be awarded to the low bidder,
Jim Hardee Equipment, Tampa, F1., in the amount of $123,040.00.
There is $150,000.00 budgeted in Account #411-217-534-066.22.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously awarded Bid
#322 for two 1987 Refuse Container Trucks to the low
bidder, Jim Hardee Equipment, Tampa, FLa., in the
amount of $123,040 per the following Bid Tabulation:
• 3•
S. F1. Mack
Riviera Beach, F1
1987
Mack RD6865
with
Accurate
AH -01160
$66,025.00
EACH
$132,050.00
Total -2
90-120 Days
ARO
=Exception-
; Engine is Mack
EM6-300
300 H.P.
S. F1. Mack
Riviera Beach, F1
1987
Mack RD6825
with
EZ Pak RTF
$67299.00
EACH
$134,598.00
Total -2
90-120 Days
ARO
*Exceptions -
Engine is
Mack EM6-300
300 H.P. o
0
Hardee Equipment
Tampa, F1
1987
Ford LT9000
with
Galbreath
U4 -OR -174
$61,520.po
EACH
$123,040.00
Total -2
150-180 Days
ARO
G. Final Plat Approval - Shorelands West Subdivision
The Board reviewed memo of Staff Planner Boling:
4
Hardee Equipment
Tampa. F1
1987
Ford LTS9000
with
Galbreath
U5 -OR -174
$63,096.00
EACH
$126,192.00
Total -2
150-180 Days
ARO
I
TO: The Honorable Members of ®ATE: December 5, 1986 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
a"2�, vc - We
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR
Robert M. Kea ing, CP SUBJECT: SHORELANDS WEST SUB -
Planning & Development Director DIVISION
THROUGH: Michael K. Miller MLtA
Chief, Current Development
FROM: Stan Boling (�, REFERENCES:. shorelands
Staff Planner STAN3
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration-- by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of December 16, 1986.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Shorelands West is a proposed 13 lot subdivision of a ±9.43 acre
parcel of land located on the west side of State Road A -1-A,
across from Smugglers Cove subdivision. At their regular meeting
of August 22, 1985, the Planning & Zoning Commission granted
preliminary. plat approval for Shorelands West, subject to the
Board of County Commissioners approving a $1,000.00 donation to
the park development fund in lieu of dedicating a required public
access easement to the river. On September 18, 1985, the Board
voted to accept the $1,000.00 donation at the time of final plat
approval in lieu of a public easement -dedication.
The owner, Shoreland Development, Inc., Roger Wheelwright,
President, is now requesting final plat approval, and has
submitted the following:
1. a final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary
plat;
2. an engineer's certified cost estimate;
3. an executed contract for construction of required
.improvements;
4. an irrevocable letter of credit; and
5. a $1,000.00 donation to the park development fund.
ANALYSIS:
The public works and utilities departments have approved the
certified cost estimate for bonding the required improvements.
Both the submitted contract and the letter of credit have been
reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's office. The letter
of credit, in the amount of $327,773.00 represents $115% of the
cost of required improvements and therefore meets subdivision
bonding standards. A $1,000.00 donation to the park development
fund has been submitted and satisfies the condition of preliminary
plat approval. All applicable subdivision regulations have been
satisfied regarding final plat approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recr- -.- f :ds that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final pla.. approval to Shorelands West Subdivision, accept the
submitted $327,773.00 letter of credit and the $1,000.00 park fund
donation, and authorize the Chairman of the Board of County
Commissioners to sign the submitted contract for construction of
required improvements.
6
BOOK 66 Fr4IC 644
DEC 16 1966 BOOK 66 f,AIA 645
Board members raised questions re the donation of $1,000 to
the park fund in lieu of dedicating the required easement as it
was felt the amount seemed inadequate.
Planner Boling explained that the access in question runs
from A -1-A to the river and it runs to within 25' of A -1-A; the
remaining piece required to be dedicated is a very small piece of
land and an appraisal was worked out.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously granted final
plat approval to Shorelands West Subdivision, accepted
the letter of credit in the amount of $327,773 and the
$1,000 park fund donation, and authorized the Chairman
-to sign the contract for construction of required
improvements.
COPIES OF SAID DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO
THE BOARD.
H. National Weather Service Equipment Upgrade & AT&T Equipment
rnntr-!;*-,t
The Board reviewed memo of Doug Wright, Director of
Emergency Management:
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: December 4 1986 FILE:
THRU: Charles P. Balczun
County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean
General Services Director SUBJECT:
National Weather Service
Equipment Upgrade and AT&T
Equipment Contract
FROM: Doug'Wright REFERENCES: Commission Approval of
Director, Emergency Management AT&T Contract on 8-6-86
Background
The National Weather Service (NWS) is in the process of upgrading
its' wire service from 300 bits per second to 1200 bits per second.
As a result, the RCA equipment currently being utilized will be
6
replaced. The equipment initially recommended by NWS was the
data Set 202T and 475 Printer with associated assembly items.
Documentation was provided to the County Commission as well as a
contract from AT&T resulting in commission approval which was
forwarded to AT&T along with Warrant #06004 in the amount of $25.00
per the contract on August 22, 1986. On September 30, 1986, Jim
Metcalf from AT&T advised by phone that the 475 printer originally
recommended had been determined to be improper for this type of
assembly configuration and the 5310 printer would have to be
utilized. On November 14., 1986, a new contract was received from
AT&T specifying the required equipment for NWS upgrade.
The new contract was submitted to Jim Wilson, Assistant County
Attorney, on November 24, 1986, and approved as to form and legal
sufficiency on November 28, 1986. He recommended the matter be
placed on the consent agenda inasmuch as only minor changes are
involved and the Board of County Commissioners had already approved
and executed the prior contract.
The contract difference, other than equipment nomenclature, amounts
to $159.84 less in the new contract. The interest rate has slightly
increased from 12.300% to 12.305%. The monthly payment has been
reduced from $80.03 to $75.59 plus $25.50 monthly maintenance charge
or a total of $101.09 over the term of 36 months. At this time the
equipment would be owned by the County and the only cost would be
the maintenance payment each month.
The RCA weather data equipment currently in use will be removed by
RCA per recent discussion with company representatives. Current
cost for the RCA weather equipment is $87.00 per month.
No additional staff will be required to operate the NWS weather
equipment. Sufficient funds have been budgeted for the payment
schedule. The private line cost however, has increased from $178.74'
tQ $243.14 per month or an additional $48.30 per month effective
as of October 1, 1986 (see memo dated 11-20-86). The notice of
increase was received on October 20, 1986. Transfer of funds by
line item will be required to cover this unexpected increase during
the budget year.
Recommendation:
It is recommended the new AT&T contract be placed on the consent
agenda authorizing the NWS weather equipment upgrade. Without
this upgrade, Indian River County will be unable to receive weather
data since current RCA equipment is limited to 300 bits per second.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved the
new AT&T contract authorizing the NWS weather equip-
ment upgrade and authorized the signature of the
Chairman.
7 BOOK 66 PA:U-E 646
C
ll 6u�
! r:at�
,%ormation Systems
F, V- usavinanx
® Purchase
❑ Monthly Term Plan
(3 month minimum)
❑ 12 Month Term Plan
L-ustomer Name
Tndian R
Address
1 Z4D_� s t 1
City, State
❑ 24 Month Term Plan
❑ 48 Month Term Plan
k
BOOP( 6 f mJF. 64 7
Computer Systems AIsI
Amendment
❑ 72 Month Term Plan
❑ Software License Only
❑ Other:
A I & I -IS Branch Code
No. Address -
Contract No. QQ
- 1}t1'tiYstt��'i$
No.
No.
m No. Floor No.
Code
Customer Requests The Provision Of The Following Products Subject To The Terms And Conditions Of The Above -Referenced ContractjAs Amt.-
Supplemented By The Terms And Conditions Set Forth On The Reverse Hereof.'ed An(
Item Product Description
Price Element Quantity Total Price/License Fee tnsta; :, -,n
Code (One- i erne
Monthly Purchase Charge )
1 (One -Time Ch .i
2724-28G 1 78.00 5.00
2
3E T
4
5
2853 WEATHER CARD 93065 1
6 614.00 58.00
7
8
9
10
11
12
Maintenance Coverage
-
Equipment
Software
Total This Page
❑ Mail In/Depot
❑ Remote Only 8-5 Mon. -Fri
212 00
128.00
❑ 8-5; Mon. -Fri.
❑ Remote Only 24 Hrs., 7 Days
Sub Total(s) From
Attached ( ) Additional Pages
❑ 24 Hours; 7 Days
❑ Dispatch 8-5, Mon. -Fri.
Less Advance Payments,
❑ Dispatch 24 Hours, 7 Days
Credits And Allowances
Shipping
tstallation/Delivery Date:
All prices and rates are Grand Total
11/15 exclusive
10 00
86
of sales/use taxes.
2138.001
128.00
ustomer Signat}ire poWJn(Uc;#ejLrpstomer hag read and agrees to the terns and conditions set forth on the
reverse hereof.
i'U'-FURK
S
ANDUVE
I NCY • '.�
AT&T Information Systems Inc.
qames
i
sst.
i son i.
Co.
Received by:
Atty ;
I r "' _
Accepted
P by:
(Authorized Signature)
Indian Rvr
(Custom
my Dpmt of Emgncy Mgmt
l w..
(Typed Name)
y -C
(Authorized Signature)
Don C. Scurlock T -r
Title)
(Typed Name)
At:
Cha i rmah
(Address)
(Title)
,. December 1601986
(city. State, zip)
(Date)
---
— On:
8 (Date)
Ir DER Application Fee - Wabasso Causeway Dredging
The Board reviewed memo of County Engineer Ralph Brescia:
TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF ®ATE: December 9, 1986 FILE:
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS _
THROUGH:
Charles P. Balczun
County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E.—t
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: DER Application Fee Wabasso
Causeway Relief Bridges
Dredging Operations
FROM: REFEREN
italph N. Brescia, P.E. CES.
County Engineer
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
As a result of requests from County residents and in an effort to
provide appropriate water circulation and flushing action for the
Indian River in the vicinity of the Wabasso Causeway, an application
for dredging was submitted to D.E.R.
According to D.E.R. Environmental Supervisor Janet Llewellyn,
before this application can be processed, an application fee of $1,000
is required.
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING
Although Staff feels the application fee is excessive, it is
recommended that the project be undertaken and the fee be paid.
Funding is available under Public Works Account #111-214-541-66.31
which was approved for this project during budget hearings.
11
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously authorized
payment of the $1,000 application fee required by
DER as recommended above.
9
D E C 16 1986 BOOK 6 D F,. E 648
DEC I S 1986 B o o K P F .Gc 649
J. Bid_ Acceptance - Kings Highway (58th Ave.) and SR 60
The Board reviewed memo of Civil Engineer Terry:
TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: December 91 1986 FILE:
Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH:
� Charles Balczun,
Ralph N. Brescia, P.E. Counter Administrator
Count' Engineer SUBJECT: Bid Acceptance for Kings
Highway (58th Ave) and SR 60
FROM:mich-el L REFERENCES:
1. Civil Engineer
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
As a result of the Development of Ryanwood .Shopping Center, necessary
improvements to Kings Highway at SR 60 were needed.
In order to properly implement these improvements, engineering plans and
specifications for roadway widening and drainage ,improvements were prepared
by Avalon Engineering in coordination with the Engineering Division. These
plans were made available to all interested contractors in response to our
advertisement for bids placed in the Press Journal on November 12, 13, and
14, 1986.
A pre-bid conference was held on December 1, 1986 to answer specific
questions by any interested contractors on the plans and specifications.
Bids were received on Wednesday, December 3, 1986 as follows:
Company Bid
Guettler & Sons $432,728.62
Ft. Pierce Contractors $429,009.20
Dennis L. Smith, Inc. $441,361.47
Dickerson of F1. $392,457.80
Staffs Engineers Estimate for this project is approximately $399,949.
.RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff reccmrends that the lowest responsible bidder Dickerson of Fl. be
considered to perform this work and that funds be appropriated in the
amount of $392,457.80 to cover the cost of this project.
Funding is to be from Impact Fees District 8 of $25,000, the Developer
required escrow of $74,933 and the balance from Gas Tax Revenue Fund 109.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously awarded
the bid for improvements to Kings Highway at SR 60
to the lowest responsible bidder, Dickerson of
Florida, in the amount of $392,457.80; the funding
to be as described above.
10
K. Final Assessment Rolls - 11th Lane SW - 1st Lane - 45th Ave.
The Board reviewed memo of Civil Engineer Terry:
TO THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF DATE: December 5, 1986 FILE: -
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THROUGH:
Charles P. Balczun
County Administrator
SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll for:
1) 11th Lane SW -12451 West of Old
Ralph N. Brescia, P. E. Dixie Hwy.
County Engineer 2) 1st Lane between 27th & 32nd
Avenue
3) 45th Avenue South of 9th P1.
FROM: Michelle A. Terry REFERENCES:
Civil Engineer
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The paving of 11th Lane SW, 1st Lane and 45th Avenue is complete.
The final cost and preliminary estimate for the work is:
Final Cost/FF Prelim: Const/FF Final Cost Prelim. Est
1) 11th Lane SW $7.52 $10.62 $23,178.15 $32,689.02
2) 1st Lane $6.92 $ 9.62 $28,075.37 $39,032.95
3) 45th Avenue $7.48 $ 9.63 $ 9,983.02 $12,844.47
All construction cost are under the original estimate. The Final
Assessment Roll has been prepared and is ready to be delivered to the
Clerk to the Board. Assessments are to be paid within 90 days or in
two equal installments, the first to be made twelve months from the due
date and the second to be made twenty-four months from the due date at
an interest rate of 1% over the Prime Rate established by the Board of
County Commissioners. The due date is 90 days after the final
determination of the special assessments.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Since the final assessment to the benefited owners will be less
than computed on the preliminary assessment rolls, the only alternative
presented is to approve the final assessment rolls.
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING
It is recommended that the Final Assessment Rolls for the paving
of 11th Lane SW, 1st Lane and 45th Avenue be approved by the Board of
County Commissioners and that they be transferred to the Office of the
Clerk to the Board for collection.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved the
Final Assessment Rolls for the paving of 11th Lane SW
(1245' West of Old Dixie); 1st Lane between 27th Ave.
and 32nd Ave.; and 45th Ave. south of 9th Place, in the
amounts set out in the above memo and authorized their
11
DEC 16 1986 BOOK. 66 rVI 50
r7-
J)FC 16 196
BOOK 66
F�:u, 6
transmission to the Office of Clerk to the Board for
collection at an interest rate of 10 over the prime rate
as of the date of approval, or 81%.
L._Surplus Property_- Generator
The Board reviewed memo of Purchasing Manager Goodrich:
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: December 9, 1986 FILE:
THRU: Joseph A. Baird SUBJECT: Surplus Property
Director, Budget Office
FROM:-✓�-� -REFERENCES:
Carolyn50odrich, Manager
Purchasing Department '
1. Description and Conditions
Several years ago, the County acquired a generator that
is approximately 20 years old from the U.S. Government.
It has been in use at the Sebastian Fire Department. It
no longer works and has been replaced.
The generator must be declared as surplus property so
it can be advertised and sold.
2. Recommendation
Staff recommends the generator be declared as surplus
property, advertised and sold.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously declared the
generator described above surplus property and directed
that it be advertised and sold.
M. I_R.C_Health Department Project_- Condemnation
The Board reviewed memo of the General Services Director:
12
TO: The Honorable Members of ®ATE: December 10, 1986 FILE:
the Board of County.
Commissioners
THRU: Charles P. Balczun SUBJECT: I.R.C. Health Department
County Administrator Project
FROM : Direc ora
General Services
REFERENCES:
In order to obtain the needed properties for the subject project,
Board authorized condemnation proceedings for Lot 2.1, Block 3,
Booker T. Washington Subdivision.
The appraisal on this piece of property came in at $19,000. The
owner has agreed to sell the property for $22,000.
Staff recommends purchase of this property at $22,000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to purchase Lot 2.1, Block 3, Booker T.
Washington Subdivision for $22,000 as recommended
by staff.
N. Budget Amendment - County Library
The Board reviewed memo of OMB Director Baird:
TO: Honorable Board of County DATE: December 10, 1986
Commissioners _
THRU:_..Tommy.Thomas
Intergovernmental
Coordinator
C
FROM: Joseph Baird
OMB Director
Account Number Account Name Increase Decrease
001-109-571-011.12. _.. _Regu.lar Salaries _ 14,861
__. 001-109-571-011.13 Other Salaries & Wages 8,237
001-109-571-012.11 Social Security 1,652
001-109-571-012.12 Retirement 3,740
001-109-571-012.13 Ins. -Life & Health._. 61
001-109-571-012.14 Worker 's_Comp. _. 10 _
SUBJECT: Budget Amendment
for Indian River
County Library
13 Boa 659
BOOK
Account Number
Account Name
Increase Decrease
001-109-571-033.19
Other Prof. Srvcs.
192
001-109-571-033.41
Janitorial Srvcs.
600
._ 001-109-571-034.21._
Postage
500
001-109-571-034.61
Maint-Buildings
1,000
001-109-571-034.63
Maint-Equipment
1,00009
001-1-571-035.25
Institutional Suppl..
734
001-109-571-035.41
Books_& Magazines
500
001-109-571-035.45
Books -
12,535
001-109-571-035.46
Subscriptions
4,000
001-109-571-035.47
Microforms
5,500
001-109-571-035.48
Audio -Visual
_
2,000
28,561 28,561
s
EXPLANATION
The approved salary
classifications
for the library were
less than originally
estimated at budget
time. The additional
funds were moved to
other operating expense
line items.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved the
above budget amendment for the library as recommended
by the OMB Director.
0. Budget Amendments to Balance Budget for FY 1985/86
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved the
budget amendments necessary to balance the budget to
close the 1985/86 fiscal year, as follows:
14
TO: Ed Fry, Jr. DATE: October 3, 1986
Finance Director
SUBJECT: Line to Line
Transfers
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
Account Number Increase Decrease
204-000-381-020.00
1,065,950
204-199-581-099.92
1,065,950
301-000-381-020.0.0
147,955
301=132-521-066.51
147,955
001-000-381-020.00
325,000
001-199-581-099.92
325,000
117-000-381-020.00
3,350
117-210-572-035.34
3,350
EXPLANATION:
When making closing adjustments for 1985/86 fiscal year,
I inadvertantly did not record the above entries.
TO: Joseph A. Baird
OBM Director
FROM: Jeffrey K. Barton
Assistant Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT
DATE: September 12, 1986
ACCT.NAME ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
CASH FORWARD-SEPT.30 ' 471-219-536-099.92
REGULAR SALARIES
471-219-536-011.12
'OVERTIME
471-219-536-011.14
'•SOC.SEC.MATCH
471-219-536-012.11
`RETIREMENT CONTRIB.
471-219-536-012.12
`OTHER CONTRACTUAL SVCS.
471-219=536-033.49
`•VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
471-219-536-034.01
.OTHER COMM.SVCS.
471-219-536-034.19
POSTAGE
471-219-536-034.21
\RENT -OTHER EQUIP.
471-219-536-034.49
\AUTO INSURANCE
471-219-536-034.51
\OTHER INSURANCE
471-219-536-034.59
MAINT.OFFICE EQUIP.
471-219-536-034.63
\MAINT.AUTO EQUIP.
471-219-536-034.64
\MAINT.HEAVY EQUIP.
471-219-536-034.65
NMAINT.OTHER EQUIP.
471-219=536-034.69
\OUTSIDE PRINTING
471-219-536-034.72
\ LEGAL ADS
471-219-536-034.91
\ PURCHASED WATER
471-219-536-034.95
\LICENSES & PERMITS
471-219-536-034.97
\ ALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
471-219-536-035.11
OTHER OPERATING SUPPL.
471-219-536-035.29
,MEETINGS & SEMINARS
471-219-536-035.43
%'DEPRECIATION
471-219-536-036.61
WATER STORAGE TANK MAINT
471-219-536-044.74
INTEREST -DEBT SVC.
471-219-536-077.21
DEC 16 1986 15
L�
370,900
B00�
35.000
3,000
3,000
.5,000
15,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
5,000
500
500
1,500
6,500
500
1,500
100
25,000
100
700
2,000
2,500
175,000
50,000
35,000
s -
BOOK 66 :br 655
TO: Joseph A. Baird DATE: September 12, 1986
OBM Director
FROM: Jeffrey K. Barton
Assistant Director of Utilities
SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENTS LINE TO LINE
ACCT.NAME ACCOUNT NO. INCREASE DECREASE
CASH FWD.-SEPT.30 472-235-536-099.92 200,000
ENGINEERING SERVICES 472-235-536-033.13 165,000
OTHER CURRENT CHARGES 472-235-536-034.99 35,000
TO: Ed Fry, Jr. DATE: September 24, 1986 FILE:
Finance Director
SUBJECT: Line to Line Transfers
C
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
REFERENCES:
OMB Director
Account Number
Account Name
Increase Decrease
REFUSE
-
001-000-364-042.0
001-209-534-034.65
Insurance Proceeds -Equip.
4,580
Plaint -Heavy Equipment
4,580
YOUTH GUIDANCE
001-000-366-091.00
001-213-523-011.12
United Way Contributions
2,310
Regular Salaries
_
2,310
PROPERTY APPRAISER
001-500-513-034.64
001-000-364-042.00
Plaint -Auto Equipment
3,500
Insurance Proceeds
3,500
REVENUE BONDS SERIES 1980 & 81
202-000-361-010.00
202-000-384-010.00
202-000-389-040.00
• 202-117-513-033.19
202-117-513-099.21
202-117-513-077.21
202-117-513-099.92
REFUND & IMPROVEMENT BONDS
204-000-335-018.00
204-117-513-077.11
204-117-513-077.21
Interest Investments
Debt Proceeds
Cash Forward -Oct. 1
Other Professionel Srvcs.
Fund Transfers Out
Interest -Debt Service
Cash Forward -Sept. 30
Half -Cent Sales Tax
Principal -Debt Service
Interest -Debt Service
SHERIFF'S BUILDING & COMMUNICATION CENTER
...301-130-519-034.02
301-132-521-034.02
301-132-521-034.91
301-132-521-033.19
301-130-519-066.49
125,545
4,720,210
64,267
4,720,210
873,355
885,765
230,000
655,765
All Travel 1,500
All Travel 2,000
Legal Ads 500
Other Professional Srvcs. 60,000
Other Machinery & Equip.
16
227,193
456,350
64,000
Account Number Account Name
INDIAN RIVER BLVD.
NORTH EXTENSION
304-214-541-033.19
304-214-541-034.91
Other
Professional Srvcs.
304-214-541-066.12
Legal
Right
Ads
of Way
304-214-541-035.39
Other
Road Mtrl/Supplies
LIBRARY
001-000-334-071.00
Aid to
Libraries
-- 001-109-571-088.36
I.R.C.
Library
001-109-571-088.49
Sebastian Library
I_.R.C. Council on Aoin
001-211-564488.32
001-106-564-088.37
PARKS DEVELOPMENT FUND
113-000-364-022.00
113-199-581-099.21
113-210-572-033.19
113-210-572-035.34
TREE ORDINANCE FINES FUND
117-000-354-001.00
117-210-572-035.34
INMATE TRUST FUND
604-000-369-095.00
604-906-523-035.28
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
102-251-519-077.12
102-199-584-099.91
POLICE ACADEMY TRUST FUND
103-600-521-035.29
103-600-521-035.43
103-600-521-099.91
103-600-521-099.92
.SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND
112-600-521-034.99
112-600-521-066.45
112-600-581-099.91
SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
114,120-522-011.12
114-120-522-012.11
114-120-522-099.91
114-120-522-099.92
I.R.C. Council on Aging
Sheltered Workshop
Surplus Land
Fund Transfers Out
Other Professional Srvcs.
Landscaping Material
Tree Ordinance Fines
Landscapint Materials
Increase
10,000
500
500,000
84,000
60,000
24,000
3,324
7,350
3,350
1,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
Inmate Trust Revenues 12,000
Food & Dietary 12,000
Decrease
510,500
3,324
Principal -Installments 4,000
Reserve for Contingency 4,000
Other Operating Supplies 500
Meetings & Seminars 27,000
Reserve for Contingency 10,000
Cash Forward -Sept. 30
Other Current Chgs/Oblig. 7,560
Communication Equipment -All 9,890 _
Reserve for Contingency 17,450
Regular Salaries 112,340 -
Social Security Matching 3,000
Reserve for Contingency 15,340
Cash Forward -Sept. 30 100,000
17
BOOK
DEC 16 1986
BOOK 6
F'r�
65 l�i � r
Account Number
Account Name
Increase Decrease
NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Other Professional Srvcs.
200,000
. 305-106-519-034.91
115-121-522-034.39
Other Utility Services
700
115-121-522-035.29
Other Operating Supplies
2,500
115-121-522-066.42
Automotive
1,513
115-121-522-066.45
Communications Equip. -All
414
115-124-522-035.29
Other Operating Supplies
1,000
115-104-581-099.96
Reserve for Contingency
6,127
FLEET MANAGEMENT
38,000
001-201-512-012.11
501-000-395-010.00
Vehicle Maint.-Charges
24,000
501-242-591-034.61
Maint-Buildings -
500
s• 501-242-591-034.64
Maint-Automotive Equip.
5,000
501-242-591-034.65
Maint-Heavy Equipment
2,000
501-242-591-034.69
Maint-Other kquipment
500
501-242-591-035.26
Expendable Tools
1,000
501-242-591-035.55
Tires & Tubes
10,000
501-242-591-035.56
Small Engine Parts
5,000
FXPI ANATTnN-
Line transfers are necessary to clean up accounts for year end.
TO: Ed Fry, Jr. DATE: September 24, 1986
FILE: Page 4'
Finance Director
SUBJECT: Line to Line Transfers
FROM:
Joseph: A. Baird REFERENCES:
OMB Director
Account Number
COUNTY HEALTH BLDG. CONSTRUCTION
Account Name
Increase Decrease
305-000-384-010.00
Debt Proceeds
400,500
305-106-519-033.19
Other Professional Srvcs.
200,000
. 305-106-519-034.91
Legal Ads
500
305-106-519-066.51
Construction in Progress
200,000
16TH STREET CONSTRUCTION
307-000-389-040.00
Cash Forward -Oct. 1
5,000
307-214-541-033.19
Other Professional Srvcs.
5,000
GENERAL FUND
001-201-512-011.12
Regular Salaries
38,000
001-201-512-012.11
Social Security Matching
200
001-201-512-012.12
Retirement Contribution
4,500
001-203-513-034.81
Advertising -Except Legal
3,300
001-206-553-011.12
Regular Salaries
11000
001-206-553-012.11
Social Security Matching
310
001-206-553-012.12
Retirement Contribution
70
001-206-553-012.13
Insurance -Life & Health
50
001-206-553-034.11
Telephone
140
001-206-553-066.41
Office Furniture & Equipment
250
001-209-534-034.33
Garbage & Solid Waste
49,000
001-209-534-034.65
Maint-Heavy Equipment
33,000
001-209-534-035.22
Tires & Tubes
1,000
001-216-519-011.12
Regular Salaries
001-216-519-012.11
Social Security Matching
001-216-519-012.12
-001-216-519-036.71
Retirement Contribution
Miscellaneous Expense
001-251-519-034.11
Telephone
001-251-519-034.59
Other Insurance
001-251-519-066.41
Office Furniture & Equipment
001-251-519-011.12
Regular Salaries
001-251-519-012.11
Social Security Matching
001-251-519-012.12
Retirement Contribution
001-251-519-012.13
Insurance -Life & Health
001-300-513-012.15
Unemployment Compensation
001-600-521-034.94
Service in Process
001-904-516-033.11
Legal Services
001-199-513-099.91
Reserve for Contingency
�. 001-199-581-099.91
Reserve for Contingency
001-199-513-099.92
Cash Forward -Sept. 30
1,200
400
100
812
23,000
51,000
5,236
2,700
425
400
800
100
3,500
10,000
51,386
68,584
110,523
TO: Ed Fry, Jr. ®ATE: September 26, 1986 FILE:
Finance Director _
SUBJECT: Line to Line Transfers
FROM: Josey A. Baird REFERENCES:
OMB Director
Account Number
001-101-511-034.63
001-101-511-012.13
001-102-514-034.02
001-102-514-035.43
001-102-514-035.41
001-102-514-035.11
001-102-514-033.19
001-203-513-011.12
001-203-513-012.11
001-203-513-012.12
001-203-513-012.13
001-203-513-035.41
001-206-553-035.42
001-206-553-035.43
001-206-553-035.11
001-208-525-011.12
001.-208-525-012.11
001-208-525-034.43
001-208-525-066.41
001-212-537-034.63
001-212-537-034.64
001-199-513-099.92
001-220-519-034.69
001-220-519-035.29
001-220-519-035.34
001-251-519-035.29
004-104-522-088.13
004-108-522-011.12
Account Name
Maint-Office Equipment
Insurance -Life & Health
All Travel
Meetings & Seminars
Books & Magazines
All Office Supplies
Other Professional Srvcs.
Regular Salaries
Social Security Matching
Retirement Contribution
Insurance -Life & Health
.Books & Magazines
Dues & Memberships
Meetings & Seminars
All Office Supplies
Regular Salaries
Social Security Matching
Rent -Office Equipment
Office Furniture & Equipment
Maint-Office Equipment
Maint-Automotive Equipment
Cash Forward -Sept. 30
Maint-Other Equipment
Other Operating Supplies
Landscaping Material
Other Operating Supplies
State Forestry Service
Regular Salaries
Increase Decrease
2,000
2,000
400
575
75
200
300
2,000
400
200
500
800
25
25
50
4,000
600
200
400
400
200
2,000 13,000
300
500
500
1
E 6 1986 19 BOOK 658
1
F7__
16 1986
BOOK 6 6 uu".659
Account Number
Account Name
Tncrease
�ecAecse
REGULAR SALARIES
004-243-519-011.12
Regular Salaries
3,000
OTHER SAL & WAGES
004-243-519-012.11
Social Security Matching
200
OVERTIME
004-243-519-012.12
Retirement Contribution
600
SPECIAL PAY
004-243-519-034.63
Maint-Office Equipment
500
ENGINEERING SVS
004-244-541-011.12
Regular Salaries
4,300
102-210-572-035.31
Paving Material
3,000
MAINT-HEAVY EQUIP
102-210-572-066.39
Improvement -Except Bldgs.
20.000.00
3,000
111-214-541-034.11
Telephone
11000
TIRES & TUBES
111-214-541-011.12
Regular Salaries
11000
114-120-522-034.53
General Liability Insurance
3,000
OTHER OPER SUPPLIES
114-120-522-099.92
_
Cash Forward -Sept. 30
3,000
9
115-104-522-099.06
Bud Tran -Property Appraiser
5,000
DEPRECIATION
115-122-522-034.69
Maint-Other Equipment
1,000
INTEREST - DEBT SVS
115-122-522-035.11
All Office Supplies
600
OTHER DEBT SVS COST
115-123-522-066.42
Automotive
30
CASH FORWARD- 9/30
115-124-522-034.64
Maint-Automotive
1,000
115-104-581-099.96
Reserve -Debt Contingency
7,630
418-000-361-010.00
Interest -Investments
17,500
418-221-572-011.12
Regular Salaries
12,000
418-221-572-012.11
Social Security Matching
1,000
418-221-572-012.12
Retirement Contribution
2,000
418-221-572-012.13
Insurance -Life & Health
1,500
418-221-572-012.14
Worker's Compensation
500
418-221-572-034.91
Legal Ads
500
FXPIANATTnN-
To correct over -budget accounts.
TO: :JOSEPH A. BAIRD DATE: SEPTEMBER 26,1986
FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON`r"� (((
b -
SUBJECT: BUDGET ADMENDMENTS - LANDFILL
0
ACCT. NAME
ACCOUNT NO.
INCREASE
DECREASE
REGULAR SALARIES
411-217-534-011.12
1000.00
OTHER SAL & WAGES
411-217-534-011.13
4,000.00
OVERTIME
411-217-534-011.14
3000.00
SPECIAL PAY
411-217-534-011.15
?500.00
ENGINEERING SVS
411-217-534-033.13
120,000.00
TELEPHONE
411-217-534-034.11
750.00
MAINT-HEAVY EQUIP
411-217-534-034.65
20.000.00
FUEL & LUBE
411-217-534-035.21
15000.00
TIRES & TUBES
411-217-534-035.22
4,000.00
INST SUPPLIES
411-217-534-035.25
250.00
OTHER OPER SUPPLIES
411-217-534-035.29
250.00
BAD DEBT - LANDFILL
411-217-534-035.52
250.00
DEPRECIATION
411-217-534-036.61
12,000.00
INTEREST - DEBT SVS
411-217-534-077.21
7,500.00
OTHER DEBT SVS COST
411-217-534-077.31
3?000.00
CASH FORWARD- 9/30
411-217-534-099.92
1093500.00
20
T®: Ed Fry, Jr.
Finance Director
FROM: Joseph 'A. Baird
OMB Director
DATE: September 23, 1986 FILE:
SUBJECT: Line Transfers to Accomodate
Jail Transfer Back to Sheriff
REFERENCES:
Account Number
Account Name
Increase
Decrease
001-906-523-011.12
Regular Salaries
81,158
001-906-523-011.14
Overtime
3,443
001-906-523-011.15
Special Pay
2,428
001-906-523-012.11
Social Security Matching
2,712
001-906-523-012.12
Retirement Contribution
7,360
001-906-523-012.13
Insurance -Life & Health
18,365
001-906-523-012.14
Worker's Compensation
21,387
001-906-523-012.15
Unemployment Compensation
001-906-523-033.12
Medical Services •
494
12,138
001-906-523-033.19
Other Professional Services
21,054
001-906-523-033.43
Homes for Infirmed
276
001-906-523-033.49
Other Contractural Services
14,338
001-906-523-034.01
Vehicle Allowance
600
001-906-523-034.02
All Travel
2,497
001-906-523-034.11
Telephone -
2,433
001-906-523-034.21
Postage
893
001-906-523-034.31
Electric Services
16,616
001-906-523-034.42
Rent - Buildings
1,600
001-906-523-034.51
Automotive Insurance
873
001-906-523-034.59
Other Insurance
619
001-906-523-034.63
Maint-Office Equipment
9,257
001-906-523-034.64
Maint-Automotive Equipment
1, 4A.4
001-906-523-034.65
Maint-Heavy Equipment
2,854
001-906-523-034.71
Inhouse Printing
1,000
001-906-523-034.72
Outside Printing
5,815
001-906-523-035.11
All Office Supplies
5,611
001-906-523-035.21
Fuel & Lubricants
4,153
001-906-523-035.22
Tires & Tubes
182
001-906-523-035.24
Uniforms & Clothing
4,197
001-906-523-035.25
Institutional Supplies
9,593
001-906-523-035.26
Expendable Tools
675
001-906-523-035.28
Food & Dietary
17,365
001-906-523-035.29
Other Operating Supplies
10,686
001-906-523-035.41
Books & Magazines
320
-001-906-523-035.43
Meetings & Seminars
2,395
001-906-523-066.29
Other Buildings
1,289
001-906-523-066.41
Office Furniture & Equipment
18,358
001-906-523-066.49
Other Machines & Equipment
788
001-600-586-099.14
Sheriff -Detention Center
299,142
21
DEC 16 1986 BOOK
p�C 1 Gca
BOOK
P. Release of Assessment Lien - I.R.Heights (Kahlo)
The Board reviewed memo of Attorney Barkett:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
DATE: December 3, 1986
SUBJECT: Release of Assessment Lien
Lot 11, Block A, Indian River Heights Subdivision
(Paving and Drainage Improvements - 16th Avenue
.Between 2nd Street and 4th Street)
FROM: Bruce Barkett�
Assistant County Attorney
There is a pending assessment lien for paving and drainage
improvements on the above -referenced property which the Tax
Collector's rolls indicate has been paid; however no release
has been provided. Therefore, please approve the attached
Release of Assessment Lien so that the encumbrance on the
property can be removed.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved
Release of Assessment Lien for paving and drainage
on Lot 11, Block A, Indian River Heights, (Rita
Kahlo) and authorized the signature of the Chairman.
22
W
RELEASE OF ASSESSMENT LIEN
For and in consideration of the sum of $504.64,
RECEIVED from Rita Kahlo, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "County")
hereby releases the property hereinafter described from a
certain special assessment lien reworded by the County in
its Official Records, Book 0661, Page 1345, for a special
assessment in the amount of $504.64 levied in accordance
with the provisions of Ordinance No. 81-27 of the County;
and hereby declares such special assessment lien fully
satisfied. The property, located in Indian River County, is
more fully described as follows:
Lot 11, Block A, Indian River Heights
Subdivision, Unit 3, as recorded in Plat
Book 6, Page 49.
Executed by the Chairman of the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, and attested
and countersigned by the Clerk of such Board, all as of this
16th day of December , 1986.
Attested and countersigned BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:�-- ".3" G
�'L WRTCRT , + r o MR / Sm 0 — —
I ����� i rma n
Circ i t CAu r. ) ,
Q. Rockridge Wastewater System_- EPA Grant
The Board reviewed the following memo from Utilities
Director Pinto:
DEC 1 6 1986 23 BOOK F'kGr 6.
Bou 66 u -F 653
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 10, 1986
THRU: Charles G. Balczun. County Administrator
FROM: Terrance G. Pinto, Director of Utility Service
SUBJECT: ROCKRIDGE WASTEWATER SYSTEM/EPA GRANT
BACKGROUND
Indian River County has applied for a DER/EPA Construction Grant to
construct sanitary sewer in Rockridge and Blue Cypress Lake..
,3. Subdivisions. EPA has accepted the project under preliminary review
and placed them on their Priority List. After further review, it was
found the Blue Cypress Lake Subdivision is not eligible. Rockridge
is eligible. The first review for eligibility.is to determine if
two-thirds of the units to be served were built prior to 1972.
Rockridge was; Blue Cypress was not.
DESCRIPTION
To continue the process, DER has requested a Financial Capability
Study which the Board approved, and the Rockridge Sewer Collection
System Study as described in Scope of Work, Exhibit "A", attached.
All indications are that we will receive the Grant, although there
are no guarantees.
RECOMMENDATION
The Utility staff recommends that we proceed and supply DER/EPA with
the required information which is to be provided by Camp, Dresser, &
McKee, Inc. as described in the Scope of Work, Exhibit "A", for a
cost not to exceed $12,900.00.
The DER requested this information to be submitted immediately to
prevent the project from being rejected. Based on this, we
authorized the consultant to proceed at his risk, payment depending
upon Indian River County Board of County Commissioners' approval.
L*14104'_IW4
Utility staff recommends approval of Work Authorization to Camp,
Dresser and McKee, Inc., for cost not to exceed $12,900.00.
Commissioner Bird asked what happens to Blue Cypress Park
since it doesn't qualify for the grant, and Director Pinto
explained that it will be done as an assessment project. Staff
will put the project -.together, go to the preliminary public
hearing, and see if the people are still interested when they
know the actual cost.
Commissioner Bowman expressed surprise that Blue Cypress
did not qualify as she felt many of the units out there have been
there for a very long time.
Director Pinto advised that this information was obtained
24
from aerial surveys taken over the years, and apparently many of
the units on each block now were not there before 1972.
Chairman Scurlock was concerned about the fact that in order
to receive the grant monies, the entity has to be self-
supporting. In this case we basically have one entity with water
and sewer combined, and our consultant felt possibly water was
subsidizing the sewer. The Chairman was no•t sure it would be
worth spending $12,900 to get this grant if we have to readdress
our entire rate structure. However, it seems there was some
error in calculations, and staff apparently feels we are going to
be able to make the internal adjustments necessary to reallocate
costs.
Director Pinto confirmed that staff has picked up the mis-
take made in that calculation, and he pointed out that actually
what we are applying for is a $750,000 grant.
Commissioner Eggert inquired about the error in figures, and
Director Pinto explained their income projections were less than
ours were.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved
Work Authorization to Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc.,
for a cost not to exceed $12,900 to prepare the
information required by DER/EPA for a grant for the
Rockridge Wastewater system.
R. Final Plat Approval - Plat 102nd Terrace (Hetra Road)
Board members reviewed staff memo, as follows:
25 BOOK d' 6
UEC 16 r6 F. ,
C 15 1986 Boor. 6
P....
TO: The Honorable Members of thepATE: December 12, 1986 FELE:
Board of County Ccmmissioners
DIVISION HEAD CC�:CURRENCE
THROUGH: Michael K. Miller
Chief, Current Development
FOR
Robert M. ea irg, KICP SUBJECT: THE PLATA OFA102NDATERRACE
Planning & Develc„ ent Director
FROM: Stan Boling 4, 61 REFERENCES: 102nd Terrace
Staff Planner IBMIRD
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of December 16, 1986.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The applicant, Hetra Computer and Communications Industries, Inc.,
is platting 102nd Terrace to satisfy a condition of their site
plan that was approved on April 11, 1985. On May 9, 1985 the
Planning and Zoning Commission granted preliminary plat approval
for the road which is approximately 4,575 feet in length (±.87
miles) and will connect the Hetra development site to C.R. 512.
The proposed 80' wide road right-of-way runs north and south
approximately one-half mile east of the I-95/C.R. 512 interchange.
The applicant has constructed the road and has submitted:
1. a final plat that is in conformance with the approved
preliminary plat;
2. a warranty maintenance agreement covering the road work;
3. a maintenance bond guaranteeing the agreement; and
4. funds to Public Works to properly treat a culvert crossing on
the road.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
Public Works has inspected all road work and has determined that
the road has been built to County standards with one exception: a
culvert crossing must be treated so as to expand the roadside
recovery area. The Public Works department, via funding by the
applicant, will be performing the necessary work within the next
several weeks. Once Public Works completes this work, the road
will meet County standards and the plat may be recorded and the
road officially accepted by the County.
The County. Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved all
submitted documents. All requirements for granting final plat
approval have been satisfied; recording of the plat and acceptance
of the road may be accomplished upon final inspection by Public
Works.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval to the plat of 102nd Terrace subject to the
following conditions:
a) the plat shall not be recorded and the road shall not be
officially accepted by the County until final inspection and
approval of the road by the public works department; and
b) the County accepts the submitted warranty maintenance
agreement and maintenance bond effective upon the date of
recordation of the plat.
26
It was noted that Board members have not had a chance to
read the backup which was just received this morning. Director
Keating explained that this was submitted so the project can move
expeditiously; they simply are bonding out for a few minor
improvements, and the procedure is nothing that is not available
to any other developer.
Chairman Scurlock understood there was -some question about a
guard rail, and Staff Planner Boling advised the developer has
agreed to fund the cost of materials to provide for more roadway
recovery area in lieu of a guard rail, and the county will not
accept the road until that is done.
Commissioner Wheeler stated that he would like to see a time
limit set on when this will be completed.
Planner Boling noted that basically Public Works will be
doing this work, and they have ordered the materials.
Director Keating informed the Board that Hetra needs the
final plat so they can get a C.O. for their building; they can't
get the C.O. until they have the plat and the road accepted; so,
no one will be driving on the road in the interim.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously granted final
plat approval to the plat of 102nd Terrace subject to
the conditions set out in the above memo.
S. Approval of Bond - Mosquito Control Board (AI Cochran)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved
Bond of Albert Cochran, Commissioner of Indian River
Mosquito Control District and authorized the signature
of the Board members.
27 BOOK 66 F,,,1,F.666
DEC 16 1986
• • • - • • • 111 • . • . - • • •
•
��5„y�� �?>xt-�, fir'' ��''k r k•° ? 4 S � ��'�.. -�d4'�'t + ��YY �' �,�����r�S J X�� P -.
r-� it Y,-y� s t+5 alt $•1�'r VS - f �[ 'kT���..�,,y..�yxF�,`-;�P � i 31 �'l
re
. ;
-
-�. xR
k +
,l A'l Skt� _� ...� N� =+t .+ t �_� i 1 � yid S�•
c {3 ffJ Y 1 y R f`4,t j.s t ul✓
u L
��t 1'{P � //4a`1 �jfj�{�)( I�1 ('(1��'(y���(/��/�JJ\�,y`��ee�•� �5���(jp;��� `' � t {�C�}-�.5 f � � �1'Y � y(c�)YF.
n €yam ii uqa r� r.5� f x f'7S r ,,jj�j�j �Hjj JI fiti z5 �.rf t��l Y
Pte!f�'�r. ♦ kF � -fir
iT
V.,1r
tltl[E�f
; L r1Sr f{fi 1ST I�CSrL1 u'�9 kr L5 �3'' 'tS r ; t Sr A~t fr"�1.
Vp r a IR �i r5d i I k Fry earl ° t� xs fi 5l�f
ry
a J
a h� rF iY. r ! w td �/�2�t -��
} �y P a� �Q4 d. y� rt
�P r; �� Y 1•(� y s � �' ar a_,
�
'.��" 1 E {✓,, :,l (l e' ;h. #y..� 5> 71 j. .� J,. x�t k � - r' !�5)• [k t ��S'-tY '+"
�fiP�f3y� t�•�r �i l �h�7��F✓�'id F�1"��"���Z��hEl�� �ity ��lt r��' u��yc� 'f� k 11�- F
d e� k} •�' ;*FpVAy]J�(}�.(���y$
4�rL�RT IV-E Y,r1i.
COMMIS.
Y..! \Kh f}�yf -
e +tea t E !
k t;73 �[ r ; q�`✓F z 1� - + �. ��`�i r 4 i �i-S � ►a S#.np��r rl'v s
.( Y T } 7p.,✓. x� �"+g [. :y,"X 4 S t "t rt�s7�` t T S y �r�11�. 1
BOUNDARIES - 90 ACRE COMMERCIAL NODE AT U.S.1 & N. GIFFORD RD.
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to -wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach. Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
. � r
a
in the matter
in the // Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of o�Y, �O G
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of. one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me thisAllav of`
n
(Business Manager)
l �
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
(SEAL)
NOTICE OF REdULATION OFLAND USE_ '
NOTICE OF
CONSIDEIR THE
RING a,.
ADOPTION OF A COUNTY ORDINANCENOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN th'
rd of
County Commissioners of Indian�River theCounty. ,
Florida, shalt hold a public hearing at which par,
flea in interest and citizens shall have an uppor
tuniChambers of the to be County Admiin the nistration Build
Ing, located at 1840 25th St., Vero Beach, Flor-
ida,on Tuesday, December 16-1988. at 9:05
a.m. to consider the adoption of en Ordinance
entitled: ' -11
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER ;
- COUNTY,- FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING
-._:" BOUNDARIES FOR THE 90 ACRE GOM- .
TION OF U.S. 41 ANON RTH G FFORD ^
„`, ROAD AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED IN.: -:",,
N. -:",; •
-THE TEXT OF THE LANO USE ELE-
MENT AND DEPICTED ON THE LAND
USE MAP -OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT'
OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE
'PLAN; PROVIDING FOR THE BOUND- -
ARY MAP, DESCRIPTION OF THE
NODE AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A map of the proposed boundary is available
at the Planning Department office on the second
floor of the County Administration Building.
Anyone who may wish to appeal -any decision
which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made which includes the testimony and evi-
dence upon which the appeal is basad
Indian River County
Board of County Commisiones
-s-Don C. Scurlock, JF:,
Chairman
Nov. 24, 1986
Staff Planner Jeffrey Goulet made the staff presentation:
29
Ae_
DEC1986
6 BOOK )
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: November 14, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF BOUND -
Robert M. at' g, --CP ARIES FOR THE 90 ACRE
Planning & Develop nt Director COMMERCIAL NODE LOCATED
ON U.S. #1 AT NORTH
nu�S THROUGH: Richard M. Shearer, AICP GIFFORD ROAD
N� Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: Jeffrey A. Goulet REFERENCES:
Z"` Staff Planner, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of December 16, 1986.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The Planning Department is initiating a request to establish
boundaries for the ninety. (90) acre commercial node located on
the east side of U.S. #1 at 45th Street (North Gifford Road).
On September 12, 1984, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
an amendment to the text of the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan which provided for establishing boundaries for
each of the nodes as generally described in the text of the Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
On July 29, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners adopted an
amendment to the text of the Land Use Plan which enlarged the
North Gifford Road/U.S. #1 Commercial Node from 85 to 90 acres.
On November 13, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 -to -0
to recommend approval of the proposed boundaries.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
The proposed boundaries of the North Gifford Road/U.S. #1
Commercial Node were prepared based on the following criteria:
1. The general description and size constraint of the node
as described in the text of the Land Use Element;
2. The existing commercial uses in the general area of the
node;
3. The existing zoning pattern;
4. Property boundaries;
5. Traffic considerations; and
6. Environmental considerations.
All of the nodes are generally described in the Comprehensive
Plan. The North Gifford Road/ U.S. #1 Commercial Node is
described as:
"A ninety (90) acre commercial node located east of U.S. #1
at the intersection of U.S. #1 and North Gifford Road."
All of the property proposed for inclusion in the node is zoned
either CL, Limited Commercial District; CG, General Commercial
District; or CH, Heavy Commercial District. The proposed node
boundaries follow property lines and the existing commercial
zoning district boundaries in all cases.
30
Existing Land Use Pattern
The developers of Grand Harbor are planning an office complex and
retail center on two parcels comprising 55 acres of land in the
northern section of the node.
Most of the existing uses zoned CG, General Cmmercial District,
are located between 45th Street and 47th Street. These uses
include the Brewer Electric Building, Mr. Miller's Lounge, a
vacant restaurant, a truck brokerage, a gasoline station, a bait-
shop,
ait-shop, and a fruit stand.
The property located south of 45th Street, zoned CH, Heavy
Commercial District, is occupied by several contractor's trade
buildings and warehouses.
There are also several large industrial establishments located in
the MXD, Mixed -Use District, on the west side of U.S. #1. These
include two citrus packing plants, a lumber yard, and a
warehouse.
Transportation System
The North Gifford Road/U.S. #1 Commercial Node has primary access
on U.S. Highway #1 (designated as an arterial on the County's
Thoroughfare Plan). The node also has secondary access on 47th
Street (classified as a local street) and 45th Street (classified
as a secondary collector street).
Environment
The node area is not designated as environmentally sensitive nor
is it in a flood -prone area.
TT+.; l , i., --
An eight inch water main is located on the west side of U.S. 1
north to 49th Street. County sewer facilities are not available
at the present time. However, this area is scheduled to be
serviced by a public sewer system within eighteen months.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, including the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation, staff recommends that the proposed
boundaries of the North Gifford Road/U.S. #1 Commercial Node be
approved.
Commissioner Bowman commented that the node is a very odd
configuration and she did not understand the enclave, and Planner
Goulet advised that the northern part of the node is the Grand
Harbor commercial sites; they were required to connect their
commercial so it all could be in the same node, and the strip is
necessary to connect those parcels.
Chief Planner Shearer noted that with a PUD, you often have
strange configurations for the commercial.
31 BOOK 66 Pvj�. 67Q
DEC
16
1986
BOO,
6 F9;,(. 67 1
The Chairman asked
if anyone present wished to be
heard.
There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 86-82 establishing the boundaries for
the 90 acre commercial node at U.S.1 at North
Gifford Road.
ORDINANCE NO. 86-82
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ESTABLISHING BOUNDARIES FOR THE 90 ACRE
COMMERCIAL NODE AT THE INTERSECTION OF U.S. #1
AND NORTH GIFFORD ROAD AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED
IN THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND
DEPICTED ON THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND -USE
ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR THE BOUNDARY MAP, DESCRIPTION OF
THE NODE AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida has amended the County's Comprehensive
Plan to provide for establishing boundaries for every commer-
cial, commercial/industrial, industrial, tourist/commercial,
and hospital/commercial node; and
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission has held a
public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation to
establish boundaries for this node; and,
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has held a
public hearing on these proposed boundaries at which parties
in interest and citizens had an opportunity to be heard; and,
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners is empowered
to adopt these boundaries to assist in the implementation of
the County's Comprehensive Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
32
SECTION 1
The attached map labeled as "Attachment All and the
description labeled as "Attachment B" shall be the official
boundaries of the 90 acre Commercial Node at the intersection
of U.S. #1 and North Gifford Road.
SECTION 2
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective
upon receipt from the Florida Secretary of State of official
acknowledgment that this ordinance has been filed with the
Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida on the 16th day of December
1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
DON C. SCURLOCK, Jr., WIRRAN
ATTACHMENT B
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF THE
NORTH GIFFORD ROAD/U.S. #1 COMMERCIAL NODE
BEGINNING AT A POINT WHERE THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S.
HIGHWAY #1 INTERSECTS THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 49TH STREET;
THENCE RUN NORTH APPROXIMATELY 1150 FEET ALONG THE EAST
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY #1; THENCE- RUN EAST
APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 280
FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 460 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOUTHWEST APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH (PARALLEL TO
U.S. #1) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET; THENCE MEANDER EAST APPROXIMATELY
1600 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 450 FEET; THENCE RUN
WEST APPROXIMATELY 670 FEET; THENCE RUN -SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 3060
FEET (CROSSING 45TH STREET); THENCE RUN WEST APPROXIMATELY 480
FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY #1; THENCE RUN
NORTH APPROXIMATELY 3370 FEET ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
U.S. HIGHWAY #1 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LYING IN SECTIONS 23
AND 26, TOWNSHIP 31S, RANGE 39E OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 90 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
DEC 16 1986 33 BOOK PnIE 6 7
--
DEC 16 1986
.1
RM -
IL
RM -10
BOOK
ATTACHMENT A
N. GIFFORD RD./U.S.+ 1
COMMERCIAL NODE
it
40
40w
ORM-6 _
E77
BOUNDARIES - 15 ACRE INDUSTRIAL NODE - GIBSON ST. & F.E.C. RR
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to -wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Reach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a 0���!4�iG�/
in the matter of/, e2&.
in the Court,/was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues ci
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, fora period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
j".= 6
(Clerk o'
(SEAL)
(Business Manag" Q '
Court, Indian River County, Florida)
NOTICE OF REGULATION OF LAND USE—
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER THE = "
ADOPTION OF A COUNTY ORDINANCE
"NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that the Board of
County Commissioners of. Indian River County,
Florida, shall hold a public hearing at which par-
ties in Interest aid citizens shall have an oppor-
tunity to be beard; in the County Commission
Chambers of .the County Administration Build-
Ing, located at 1840 25th St. Vero Beach, Flor-
ida, on Tuesday,. December 16, 1986, at 9`.05
a.m. to -consider the adoption- of, an, Ordinance .
entitled:
AN ORDI�ANCE OF INDIAN RIVER
,COUNTY, ` FLORIDA,' ` ESTABLISHING
BOUNDARIES' FOR THE -16 ACRE IN-
DUSTRIAL NODE BETWEEN GIBSON
,STREET AND THE. FLORIDA EAST
COAST RAILROAD AS GENERALLY DE-
SCRIBED IN THE TEXT OF THE LAND.
USE ELEMENT AND DEPICTED ON THE
<LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COM -
Of AN• 1312r1VinINC3 FAR
Mr- CVUNWAnr 1.
OF THE NgDE AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
A map of the proposed boundary is available
at the Planning' Department office on the second
floor of the:County Administration Building.
Anyone who may wish to appeal an decision
which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of.the proceedings
is made which includes the testimony and evi-
dence upon which the appeal is based. .
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
-a-Don C. Scurlock, Jr.,
. Chairman
Nov,`24, 1986
-r -
Staff Planner Goulet made the following presentation:
35 BOOK
L_
DEC 16 19086
DEC 16 1986 BOOK 66 F',k IJE 6 i
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: November 14, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
SUBJECT:
Robert M. Ke4j_nge,7AICP
Planning & Develo ment Director
ESTABLISHMENT OF BOUND-
ARIES FOR THE 15 ACRE
INDUSTRIAL NODE LOCATED
BETWEEN GIBSON STREET AND•
cc THROUGH: Richard M. Shearer, AICP THE F.E.C.R.R.
gel Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: Jeffrey A. Goulet REFERENCES:
.)a Staff Planner, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of December 16, 1986.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The Planning Department is initiating a request to establish
boundaries for the fifteen (15) acre industrial node located
between Gibson Street and the Florida East Coast Railway in
Roseland.
On September 12, 1984, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
an amendment to the text of the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan which provided for establishing boundaries for
each of the nodes.as generally described in the text of the Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
On July 29, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners adopted an
amendment to the text of the Land Use Element of the.
Comprehensive Plan which created a 15 acre Industrial Node along
Gibson Street in Roseland. -
On November 13, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
6 -to -0 to recommend approval of the proposed boundaries.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
The proposed boundaries of the Gibson Street Industrial Node were
prepared based on the following criteria:
1. The general description and size constraint of the node
as described in the text of the Land Use Element;
2. The existing commercial uses in the general area of the
node;
3. The existing zoning pattern;
4. Property boundaries;
5. Traffic considerations; and
6. Environmental considerations.
All of the nodes are generally described in the Comprehensive
Plan. The Gibson Street Industrial Node is described as:
" A fifteen (15) acre industrial node located north of the
Sebastian City Limits between Gibson Street and the
Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way."
All of the property proposed for inclusion in the node is
presently zoned IL, Light Industrial District. The proposed node
boundaries follow property lines and the existing industrial
zoning district boundaries in all cases.
36
Existing Land Use Pattern
The uses which are located within the proposed boundaries of the
node include a county garbage transfer station, a mini -warehouse
complex, an aluminum products company, several mobile homes, and
an open storage yard for a house moving company.
The proposed node boundaries encompass all of the industrially -
zoned property in this area and the adoption of the proposed
boundary will prevent future encroachment of industrial uses into"
adjacent residential areas.
Environment
The node area is not designated as environmentally sensitive nor
is it in a flood -prone area.
TT+. , l , � ; --
County water -and sewer facilities are not available in the node
area at the present time. However, the County is in the process
of developing plans for a wastewater treatment plant for the
North County.
Transportation System
The primary means of access to all of the property in the node is
130th Street (Gibson Street). Gibson Street is classified as a
secondary collector on the County's Thoroughfare Plan. Roseland
Road (classified as a primary collector) is the primary point of
access onto Gibson Street.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, including the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation, staff recommends that the proposed
boundaries of the Gibson Street Industrial Node be approved.
The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard.
There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Bowman wished it noted for the record that this
was savannah and a secondary water recharge area fairly recently,
and this is good evidence of what happens if we don't take care
of these areas.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 86-83 establishing boundaries for the
37
DEC 16 1986 BOCK 66 PAA76
ROOK 6. 6 r" 677
15 acre Industrial Node between Gibson Street and
the F.E.C. Railroad.
ORDINANCE NO. 86-83
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ESTABLISHING BOUNDARIES FOR THE 15 ACRE
INDUSTRIAL NODE BETWEEN GIBSON STREET AND THE
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD AS GENERALLY
DESCRIBED IN THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT
AND DEPICTED ON THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR THE BOUNDARY MAP, DESCRIPTION OF
THE NODE AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida has amended the County's Comprehensive
Plan to provide for establishing boundaries for every commer-
cial, commercial/industrial, industrial, tourist/commercial,
and hospital/commercial node; and
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission has held a
public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation to
establish boundaries for this node; and,
WHEREAS, The Board of County -Commissioners has held a
public hearing on these proposed boundaries at which parties
in interest and citizens had an opportunity to be heard; and,
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners is empowered
to adopt these boundaries to assist in the implementation of
the County's Comprehensive Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
SECTION 1
The attached map labeled as "Attachment A" and the
description labeled as "Attachment B" shall be the official
boundaries of the 15 acre Industrial Node between Gibson
Street and the Florida East Coast Railroad.
SECTION 2
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective
upon receipt from the Florida Secretary of State of official
acknowledgment that this ordinance has been filed with the
Department of State.
38
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida on the 16th day of December
1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY: 2) .0"" C-.- All1
DON C. SCURL CK,,Jr., IRMAN
ORDINANCE NO. 86-83
ATTACHMENT B
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF THE
GIBSON STREET INDUSTRIAL NODE
BEGINNING AT A POINT WHERE THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 130TH
STREET (GIBSON STREET) INTERSECTS THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE ABANDONED PORTION OF .80TH AVENUE (ESTES STREET); THENCE RUN
NORTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 455 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD; THENCE RUN SOUTHEAST
APPROXIMATELY 1300 FEET ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE FLORIDA
EAST COAST RAILROAD; THENCE RUN SOUTHWEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
BLOCK 17 OF A.A. BERRY SUBDIVISION APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET TO THE
NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 130TH STREET (GIBSON STREET); THENCE
RUN NORTHWEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 130TH STREET
(GIBSON STREET) APPROXIMATELY 1280 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
LYING IN SECTION 21, FLEMING GRANT, OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA. CONTAINING 17.19 ACRES, MORE OF LESS.
DEC 16 1986
39 BOOK
J
DEC 16 1986
BOOK Fqj' 679,
ORDINANCE NO. 86-83
ATTACHMENT A
GIBSON ST. INDUSTRIAL NODE
I.I Lw —I% R*M 6
71 1 85-4
JE) 135TH
H
33 r (/445
OQ O
luE U
UE)� N 134TH =
cn ~
m O
® 31 34 °D 44B
cn I rfil cFn
IUE) 133RD
14 z
-10 30 R Sf3—
18 0%3HWAY N0. 1 I
19
0
MJ-8cc
I
I I I I11
iTREET I I
21
129TH
23
129TH
25
129TH
40
W W
z 22 z
W W
Q Q
PLACE
�- 2 4
m �
ti ti
1�6
COURT
I
26
STREET
BOUNDARIES - 120 HOSPITAL/COMMERCIAL NODE - U.S..1 & ROSELAND RD.
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to -wit:
VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER; STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
in the matter of �
�r
in the
Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of ldEr ,Zf_ 2� z�Y�o
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second 'class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day .19
1 � --�'l �.� • �L.L.-t' (Business Manager)
_1
I
(SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River County, Florida)
::.NOTICE OF REGULATION OFLAND USE", --
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER THE
AD&TION OF A -COUNTY ORDINANCE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, lihall hold a public hearing at which par-
ties in Interest and citizens shall have an oppor-
tunity to be heard, in the County Commission
Chambers of the County Adminiatiation Build -
Ing, located at 1840 25th St., Vero Beach, Flor-
ida, . on Tuesday, December 16, -1988, at 9:05
a.m. ;to, consider the adoption of -an .Ordinance
entitled:.
,t AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RNER
`COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING
BOUNDARIES FOR THE 120 ACRE
HOSPITAL/COMMERICAL NODE AT
THE INTERSECTION OF U.S: #1' AND
ROSELANO ROAD AS GENERALLY DE-
SCRIBED IN THE TEXT OF THE LAND
USE ELEMENT AND DEPICTED ON THE
LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND, USE
ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COM-
PREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR
;.=:THE BOUNDARY MAP, DESCRIPTION -
OF'THE NODE AND EFFECTIVE DATE... `.
A map of the proposed boundary is available
at the Planning Department office on the seconc
floor of the County Administration Building.
. Anyone who may .wish to appeal any decision
which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made which includes the testimony and evi-
dence upon which the appeal is based.
Indian River County
,.. Board of County Commissioners
=s -Don C. Scurlock, Jr.,
Chairman
Nov. 24,1986
Staff Planner Goulet made the following presentation:
41 BOOK, 66 PD.Gr 68®
DEC 1 � �9��
DECF7__ -
16 1996
BOOK �� Fr�uC.Qys
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: November 14, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners -
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF BOUND -
Robert M. I a ing,,,%AICP ARIES FOR THE 120 ACRE
Planning & Development Director HOSPITAL/COMMERCIAL NODE
LOCATED ON U.S. 1 AND
go!2 THROUGH: Richard M. Shearer ROSELAND ROAD
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: Jeffrey A. Goulet, REFERENCES:
Staff Planner, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of December 16, 1986.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The Planning Department is initiating a request to establish
boundaries for the 120 acre Hospital/ Commercial Node located on
U.S. #1 at Roseland Road.
On September 12, 1984, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
an amendment to the text of the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan which provided for establishing boundaries for
each of the nodes as generally described in the text of the Land
Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
On December 18, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners adopted
the boundaries of the 25 acre Tourist Commercial Node located on
U.S. #1 at the north county line.
On July 29, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners adopted an
amendment to the text of the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan which combined the 25 acre Tourist Commercial
Node and the 75 acre Hospital/ Commercial Node and enlarged the
new node by 20 acres to create a 120 acre Hospital/ Commercial
Node centered at U.S. #1 and Roseland Road.
On November 13, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
6 -to -0 to recommend approval of the proposed boundaries.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
The proposed boundaries of the U.S.#1/Roseland Road
Hospital/ Commercial Node were prepared based on the following
criteria:
1. The general description and size constraint of the node
as described in the text of the Land Use Element;
2. The existing commercial and medically -related uses in
the general area of the node;
3. The existing zoning pattern;
4. Property boundaries;
5. Traffic considerations; and
6. Environmental considerations.
All of the nodes
Plan. The U.S.
described as:
are generally described in the Comprehensive
#1/Roseland Road Hospital/Commerical Node is
42
"A one hundred twenty (120) acre hospital commercial node
is located at the intersection of Roseland Road and U.S. #1
adjacent to the existing hospital."
All of the property proposed for inclusion in the node is
presently zoned CL, Limited Commercial District; CG, General
Commercial District; or. MED, Medical District. The proposed
boundaries follow existing commercial zoning district boundaries
in all cases.
Existing Land Use Pattern
The uses which are located in the northern part of the node
include a bowling alley, a gas station and auto body shop, an
auto parts store, a motel and lounge, a barber shop, a real
_.estate office, an office plaza, and a retail center zoned CL.
A hospital and several medical office complexes are located in
the central portion of the node which is zoned MED. The southern
part of the node is occupied by Riverwalk Shopping Center,
Roseland Shopping Center, a Zippy Mart convenience store, and a
small office building which are zoned CG.
Approximately 50 acres within the proposed boundaries for the 120
acre Hospital/Commercial Node are presently vacant.
Future Land Use Pattern
The node area is not designated as environmentally sensitive nor
is it located in a flood -prone area. The node is located on the
coastal sand ridge, which is characterized by excessively well
drained soils, and serves as a primary aquifer recharge area.
TTti 1 i ti Pc _
County water and sewer facilities are not available in the node
area at the present time. However, the County is in the process
of developing plans for a regional wastewater treatment plant for
the North County. -
Transportation System
The primary means of access to most of the property located in
the node area is U.S. #1 (classified as an arterial on the
Thoroughfare Plan). Several properties also have access to
Roseland Road (classified as a primary collector) and N. Indian
River Drive (classified as a local street).
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, including the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation, staff recommends that the proposed
boundaries of the 120 acre Hospital/Commercial Node be approved.
The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard.
There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously closed
the public hearing.
D E C 1 `�� 43 Booc�,,
DEC 16 1936
BOOK 6 u F4 'r. 6 S3
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 86-84 establishing boundaries of the
120 acre Hospital/Commercial Node on U.S.1 and
Roseland Road.
ORDINANCE NO. 86-84
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ESTABLISHING BOUNDARIES FOR THE 120 ACRE
HOSPITAL/COMMERCIAL NODE AT THE INTERSECTION OF
U.S. #1 AND ROSELAND ROAD AS GENERALLY
DESCRIBED IN THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT
AND DEPICTED ON THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR THE BOUNDARY MAP, DESCRIPTION OF
THE NODE AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida has amended the County's Comprehensive
Plan to provide for establishing boundaries for every commer-
cial, commercial/industrial, industrial, tourist/commercial,
and hospital/commercial node; and
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission has held a
public hearing and subsequently made a recommendation to
establish boundaries for this node; and,
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has held a
public hearing on these proposed boundaries at which parties
in interest and citizens had an opportunity to be heard; and,
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners is empowered
to adopt these boundaries to assist in the implementation of
the County's Comprehensive Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
SECTION 1
The attached map labeled as "Attachment A" and the
description labeled as "Attachment B" shall be the official
boundaries of the 120 acre Hospital/Commercial Node at the
intersection of U.S. #1 and Roseland Road.
44
SECTION 2
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective
upon receipt from the Florida Secretary of State of official
acknowledgment that this ordinance has been filed with the
Department of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida on the 16th day of December
1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY: /moo►. G z4f,44
DON C. SCURLO K, Jr.,�C RMAN
ATTACHMENT B
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION OF THE
ROSELAND ROAD/U.S. 1 HOSPITAL/COMMERCIAL NODE
BEGINNING AT A POINT WHERE THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 105TH
STREET (ROSELAND ROAD) INTERSECTS THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
AVENUE FIVE; THENCE RUN SOUTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 425 FEET ALONG THE
EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AVENUE •FIVE; THENCE RUN NORTHEAST
APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEAST (PARALLEL TO U.S. #1)
APPROXIMATELY 1225 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH APPROXIMATELY 750 FEET
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF CHARLES SUBDIVISION; THENCE RUN SOUTHEAST
APPROXIMATELY 325 FEET; THENCE RUN WEST APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET;
THENCE RUN SOUTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET; THENCE RUN WEST
APPROXIMATELY 80 FEET AND SOUTHWEST APPROXIMATELY 50 FEET TO THE
EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. #1; THENCE RUN NORTHWEST
APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S.
#1; THENCE RUN SOUTHWEST (CROSSING U.S. #1) APPROXIMATELY 445
FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWEST APPROXIMATELY 540 FEET; THENCE RUN
NORTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWEST
APPROXIMATELY 1760 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 105TH
STREET (ROSELAND ROAD); THENCE RUN NORTHEAST ALONG THE SOUTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 105TH STREET (ROSELAND ROAD) APPROXIMATELY
250 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWEST APPROXIMATELY 850 FEET TO THE NORTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 83RD STREET (BAY STREET); THENCE RUN
SOUTHWEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 83RD STREET
APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHWEST APPROXIMATELY 1300
FEET TO THE SEBASTIAN RIVER; THENCE RUN NORTHEAST ALONG THE
SEBASTIAN RIVER APPROXIMATELY 170 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHEAST
APPROXIMATELY 120 FEET; THENCE RUN EAST ALONG THE SOUTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 140TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 870 FEET TO THE
EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 79TH AVENUE (PALM LANE); THENCE RUN
NORTH ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 79TH AVENUE
APPROXIMATELY 680 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 142ND
WAY; THENCE RUN NORTHEAST ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
142ND WAY APPROXIMATELY 380 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 143RD STREET; THENCE RUN WEST ALONG THE
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 143RD STREET APPROXIMATELY 240 FEET TO
THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 78TH AVENUE; THENCE RUN NORTH ALONG
THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 78TH AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 1460 FEET
TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ERLING LANE; THENCE RUN NORTH
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF LOT 3, BLOCK A, ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS
SUBDIVISION AN ADDITIONAL 300 FEET TO THE SEBASTIAN RIVER; THENCE
RUN EAST ALONG THE SEBASTIAN RIVER APPROXIMATELY 250 FEET TO THE
NORTH SECTION LINE OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 30S, RANGE 38E; THENCE
RUN EAST (CROSSING U.S. #1) APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET ALONG THE NORTH
SECTION LINE OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 30S, RANGE 38E; THENCE RUN
SOUTHEAST ALONG THE WEST BANK OF THE INDIAN RIVER APPROXIMATELY
45
DEC 16 1986BOGK 00 P}" E 6S' 4
DEQ 16 ��8b
BOOK 6
650 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHWEST APPROXIMATELY 280 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOUTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
110TH STREET (BAY STREET); THENCE RUN SOUTHWEST ALONG THE NORTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 110TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 520 FEET; THENCE
RUN SOUTHEAST ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF RIVER TREES SUBDIVISION
APPROXIMATELY 1360 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTHEAST ALONG THE SOUTHEAST
LINE OF RIVER TREES SUBDIVISION APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET; THENCE RUN
SOUTHEAST APPROXIMATELY 690 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
105TH STREET (ROSELAND ROAD); THENCE RUN SOUTHWEST ALONG THE NORTH
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF 105TH STREET (ROSELAND ROAD) APPROXIMATELY
540 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LYING IN SECTIONS 25 AND 36,
TOWNSHIP 30S, RANGE 38E OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 119.25 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
ATTACHMENT A
Roseland Road / U.S.1
Hospital / Commercial Node
Proposed
de Boundary
46
RM -6
DISCUSSION RE TRANSPORTATION COSTS FOR ELECTIONS & DEDUCTION OF
MEDICARE FOR POLLWORKERS
Ann Robinson, Supervisor of Elections, came before the Board
to review the following:
December 10, 1986
TO: HON. DON C. SCURLOCK, JR., CHAIRMAN, BCC
FROM: ANN ROBINSON, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
RE: TRANSPORTATION COSTS FOR ELECTIONS
In the past, the transportation costs for the county -wide
elections have remained in the Road & Bridge budget*; the
costs were not charged to the Elections budget.
Attached are two bills from Road & Bridge for transportation
costs for the second primary and the general election amounting
to $3,405.19. Because no money was put in the Elections budget
to cover this, I need to know how the BCC wants to handle it.
For your information, the transportation costs using the old
voting machines for the two elections would have been $12,336.80.
Thank you again for purchasing the new voting equipment.
If you want us to furnish additional information for a discussion
of this at your meeting, of December 16, please let me know.
�+ vnr'k�
December 15, 1986 Ss�o�,F
TO: DON C. SCURLOCK, JR., CHAIRMAN, BCC
FROM: ANN ROBINSON, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS W-�
RE: ADDITION TO ITEM 7E ON BCC AGENDA OF DEC. 16
We finally received material from the Florida Department
of Administration today regarding the Medicare coverage
which they have interpreted to apply to pollworkers.
Our office did not receive any notice in regard to the
medicare deduction for pollworkers until a telephone call
came the week after the general election from an employee
of the Department of Administration. Despite my request
that day, November 11, and two additional requests by
phone, the attached memorandum No. 86-149 wasn't sent
until December 12.
I have discussed this with Joe Baird, Charles Vitunac,
Ed Fry, and Don Hylton.
I request that the BCC put $800 from contingency into
001-700-519-011.13 so that medicare contributions can
be sent to the Division of Retirement in the Department
of Administration as soon as possible.
47
DEC 16 1986
BOOK 66 Fe!_IF SJ
_t -
DEC 1996
BOOK b6 i,pUr- 6S_ 7
V�i anent ®f sidministrallall
BOB GRAHAM Division of Retirement AJ. McMULLIAN l
Governor State Retirement Dire
GILDA H. LAMBERT Cedars ExecuttCenter, Building C TOM F. WOOTEN
ally Talla
Secretary of Administration Northh Monroe Street . Chief.
Tallahassee. Florida 32303
Telephone (904) 488-6011 Bureau of EnroUmec
Contributions
December 5, 1986
p M
MEMORANDUM NO. 86-149 � a
C
TO: Board of County Commissioners, Supervisors of — {ti
1 Elections, Cities and Municipalities Ul
FROM: Tom F. Wooten, Chiefd'�°
Bureau of Enrollment & Contributions
SUBJECT: Medicare Coverage - Election Workers'
As you know, Publ i c Law 99-272 requi res al l persons hi red on or after Apri 1 1,
1986 to have Medicare Coverage. Most of the employees you hire automatically
have Medicare coverage as part of -their social security coverage under your present
agreement. This new requirement is directed at those persons you hire who do
not normally come under your social security agreement. Under this law, election
officials and election workers hired on or after April 1, 1986 are mandatorily
covered for Medicare taxes.
Recently Congress passed Public Law 99-514 which contained a provision
that amended Public Law 99-272. This provision provided for the exclusion from
Medicare of election officials and election workers if their payment for such
services is less than $100.00 in a.calendar year. According to the Social Security
Administration (SSA) Medicare contributions will be due on all compensation earned
by an election official or election worker if they earn $100.00 or more in a calendar
year. This exclusion is effective with services performed after March 31, 1986.
In view of this change, it will, be necessary for your agency to refund
the Medicare deductions to any election official or election worker who earned
less than $100.00 this year. To enable your agency to receive a credit for the
Medicare contributions reported to the Division for election officials or election
workers earning less than $100.00, please decrease your December Medicare deposit
by the amount of contributions reported in error. If the credit due is greater
than your remaining Medicare* deposits for calendar year 1986, please notify the
Social Security Adjustment Section, Division of Retirement, of the amount of credit
due your agency. These contributions shall be refunded to you after the Social
Security Administration balances the 1986 calendar year. In completing Forms
W-2 for election officials or election workers earning less than $100.00, do not
enter any Medicare wages or contributions.
If you have questions regarding this change, please contact the Social
Security Adjustments Section at (904) 487-1940.
Supervisor Robinson first discussed the medicare coverage
requirements established by a new law passed last April 1st by
the federal government, and the fact that the information that
this applied to pollworkers was belatedly received. The Medicare
contribution is 1.45% from the employee and 1.45% from the
Supervisor of Elections, but since she was not informed in time
48
to take it out of the pollworkers' paychecks, she will have to
pay the 2.9% for every pollworker who made $100 or more, which
amounts to the $800. It already has cost more than that in staff
time to figure this out.
Commissioner Bird inquired if this means that in the future
Supervisor Robinson would try not to have any workers earn more
than $100 in a year. Mrs. Robinson felt that they will just have
to be careful about making the deduction in the future as the
pollworkers require training and she likes them to be able to
work as many elections as they can so they are more experienced.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously authorized
placing $800 from contingency into Acct. 001-700-519-
011.13 as requested by the Supervisor of Elections.
Supervisor Robinson then wished to know how the Board wanted
to handle the payment of the bills from Road & Bridge for trans-
portation costs. This cost used to be left in the Road & Bridge
budget, but if the Board desires, it is fine with her if they put
this expense in the Election's budget and give her the additional
money, and she then will pay Road 8 Bridge.
Discussion ensued re proper cost allocation, and OMB
Director Baird advised that both of the items discussed by the
Supervisor of Elections will have to come out of contingency.
Chairman Scurlock did not see why this can't be taken out of
the Road 8 Bridge budget since they were paying for it before,
but OMB Director Baird felt they really are not getting paid if
he reduces their budget.
The Chairman pointed out that we budgeted money within their
budget for salaries and if we take that money out of their budget
and put it in the Election's budget, it then.reflects the true
cost of the operation.
49
60-38-
BOOK 6
BOOK. 6� �
6
Commissioner Bird did not understand the logic in that, and
OMB Director Baird explained that Road and Bridge has a fixed
payroll, and it depends how they allocate the services; their
payroll account could be reduced if the Board desires.
The Chairman stressed that in the future we want proper cost
allocation so we know the true picture of costs for each depart-
ment.
Commissioner Eggert asked what we can do to show this this
year, and OMB Director Baird stated he could either reduce the
Road & Bridge salary account or take it out of contingency.
Commissioner Wheeler asked if we just couldn't show this in
their proposed budget for next year, and it was generally agreed
we can start to do this next year.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously authorized
handling the election transportation costs next year,
as discussed. ,
Chairman Scurlock clarified that the Motion is that next
year this expense will be funded in the Supervisor of Election's
budget as opposed to Road and Bridge.
Mrs. Robinson asked if she should just write Public Works
Director Davis a letter of thanks for his help this time, and
this was confirmed.
CO -INITIATED REZONING 20 ACRES TO RM -6 & RS -3 (27TH AVE. & OSLO)
The hour of 9:30 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to -wit:
50
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
in the matter of
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of �9��
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 11
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
(SEAL)
{
19
(Business Manager)
Court, Indian River County, Florida)
N6'hCE PUBLIC HEARING .
Notice of hearing initiated by In ian River
County to consider the adoption of a County Or-
...
rezoningland from: RMH-6, Mobile
Home Residential District and RM -3; Multiple -
Family Residential District to RM -6, Multiple -
Family Residential District, subject property do -
scribed as Parcel #1. Alsoto rezone land from
RMH-6, Mobile Residential District to RS -3; Sin-
gle=Family Residential District, subject property.
described as Parcel #2. The properties are lo-
cated on the north side of 9th Street S.W. (Oslo
Road),, east of. 43rd Avenue and west of 27th
Ave.The -,.
subject property is described as.
Parcell
- The south 700 feet of the east` 20 acres
of tract 15, and the south 700 feet of the
west 10 acres of tract 16,' jn Section 22,
Township 33 South. Range 39 East, as
shown on the plat of Indian River Farms
Company Subdivision filedin the office .
of the clerkof the circuit court of St.
Lucie County, Florida, In plat book 2,' ;t
page 25; said land now lying and being`
in Indian River County, , Florida; less
rights of -way of record.
Rezone from RMH-6 and RM -3 to; RM -6
Parcel 2
,. The north 640 feet of the east 10 acres
of, tract 15; in Section 22, Township 33
South, Range 39 East, as shown on the
plat of Indian River Farms Company
Subdivision filed in the office of the cierk ,.
of the circuit court of. at. Lucie Coupty
Florida,: in plat, book 2, page 25,.said
"land now lying and being in Indian diver
County, Florida.
Rezone form RMH-6 to RS -3
A public hearing at which. parties in Interest
and citizens: shall have an ;opportunity to be
heard, will be held by the Board of County Com-
missioners of Indian River County, Florida, in the
County Commission ,Chambers of the County
Administration Building, located at 1840 25th St.,
Vero Beach, Florida, on.Tuesday, December 16,
1986, at 9:30 a.m.
The Board of County Commissioners may
grant a rezoning to a less intense zoning district
than the district requested provided it is. within
the same general use category.
Anyone who may wish to. appeal any decision'
which may be made atthis meed g, will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made.which includea.the testimony and evi-
donee upon which the appeal is based E
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
-s-Don C. Scurlock, Jr.;,a . .
Chairman
Nov..24,1986 j
Chief Planner Richard Shearer made the staff presentation
and recommendation of approval:
51
BOOK
.r-
DEC 16 1986 BOOK F 4
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: December 4, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners -
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
SUBJECT: COUNTY -INITIATED REQUEST
Robert M. Keat ng, CP TO REZONE 20 ACRES FROM
Planning & Develop ent Director RMH-6 AND RM -3 TO RM -6
AND RS -3
FMS
FROM: Richard M. Shearer, REFERENCES:
Chief, Long -Range Planning
" It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of December 16, 1986.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The County is initiating a request to rezone approximately 15
acres located on the north side of Oslo Road and approximately
one-quarter mile west of 27th Avenue from RMH-6, Mobile Home
Residential District (up to 6 units/acre), and RM -3,
Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 3 units/acre), to
RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 6 units/acre);
and to rezone approximately 5 acres located 600 feet north of
Oslo Road and approximately one-quarter mile west of 27th Avenue
from RMH-6 to RS -3, Single -Family Residential District.
On January 14, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners held the
first of two required public hearings on the nonresidential
zoning conversion ordinance. At that public hearing, several
individuals who owned property on the north side of Oslo Road
objected to their property being rezoned from C-1, Commercial
District, to RM -3 because they felt it would be unfeasible to
develop the property at that density. The Board did rezone the
property to RM -3 on January 29th. However, the Board instructed
the staff to initiate a Comprehensive Plan amendment request so
that the Board could later consider rezoning properties in this
area from RM -3 to RM -6.
On July 29, 1986, the Board of County Commissioners amended the
Comprehensive Plan to increase the allowable residential density
from three to six units per acre in the west part of the Oslo
Road MXD, Mixed -Use District.
On November 13, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
6 -to -0 to recommend approval of this request.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli-
cation will be presented. The analysis will include a descrip-
tion of the current and future land uses of the site and sur-
rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and
utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ-
mental quality.
Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject property consists of three parcels of land which are
undeveloped. However,. the middle parcel of land which extends
one-quarter mile north of Oslo Road, is the site of a proposed
mobile home park which received site plan approval several years
ago and was never completed. The owners of this property
installed some roads but have abandoned the idea of developing
this property for a mobile home park. North of the subject
52
property is undeveloped land and a single-family subdivision
zoned RS -3. East of the subject property is undeveloped property
zoned RS -3 and a warehouse, undeveloped land and three
single-family dwellings zoned CL, Limited Commercial District.
South of the subject property, across Oslo Road, is a
single-family subdivision being developed and undeveloped land
zoned RS -3. West of the subject property is Tippin Landscaping
Service and Vero Mini Storage zoned CH, Heavy Commercial
District.
Future Land Use Pattern
The Comprehensive Plan designates the north 600 feet of the
subject property (proposed for rezoning from RMH-6 to RS -3) as
LD -1, Low -Density Residential 1 (up to 3 units/acre). The
proposed :.RS -3 zoning is consistent with the LD -1 land use
designation and the existing RS -3 zoning that surrounds this part
of the subject property on three sides. The Comprehensive Plan
designates the south 700 feet of the subject property (proposed
for rezoning -from RMH-6 and RM -3 to RM -6) as part of the Oslo
Road MXD, Mixed -Use District (up to 6 units/acre). The proposed
RM -6 zoning is consistent with the MXD land use designation.
Transportation System
The subject property has direct access to Oslo Road (classified
as an arterial street on the County's Thoroughfare Plan). The
maximum development of the subject property under the proposed
RS -3 and RM -6 zoning could generate up to 735 average annual
daily trips (AADT). Oslo Road currently carries approximately
4,000 AADT with a level -of -service "C" capacity of 13,100 AADT.
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally
sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area.
Utilities
A County watermain runs along the northside of Oslo Road. County
wastewater facilities are not currently available.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, including the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation, staff recommends approval.
The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard.
There were none.
If -
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance
86-85 rezoning 20 acres west of 27th Ave. and north of
Oslo Road to RM -6 and RS -3 as advertised.
53
DEC 16 1986Boos6 1 E6'
BOOK 6'6 `',� j-.6 93
ORDINANCE NO. 86-85
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP
FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING
FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the
local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing
and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning
request; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has determined
that this rezoning is in conformance with the Land Use Element of
the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has held a public
hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning of
the following described property situated in Indian River County,
Florida, to -wit:
Parcel 1
The south 700 feet of the east 20 acres of tract 15, and the
south 700 feet of the west 10 acres of tract 16, in Section
22, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, as shown on the plat
of Indian River Farms Company Subdivision filed in the
office of the clerk of the circuit court of St. Lucie
County, Florida, in plat book 2, page 25; said land now
lying and being in Indian River County,' -Florida; less
rights-of-way of record.
Be changed from RMH-6, Mobile Home Residential District and RM -3,
Multiple -Family Residential District, to RM -6, Multiple -Family
Residential District. And that the following described property:
Parcel 2
The north 640 feet of the east 10 acres of tract 15, in
Section 22, Township 33 South, Range 39 East, as shown on
the plat of Indian River Farms Company Subdivision filed in
the office of the clerk of the circuit court of St. Lucie
County, Florida, in plat book 2, page 25; said land now
lying and being in Indian River County, Florida.
Be changed from RMH-6, Mobile Home Residential District, to RS -3,
Single -Family Residential District.
54
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and
described in said Zoning Regulations.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida on this 16th day
of December , 1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By
Don C. Scurlock; Jr., hairman
o r a
3
C13
m
S 4 a
SR14 __ ....
0W0110M DON
QED
5r —ur— it
- - --- III
RMH-6 TO RS -3
J
1
14
I
-_REBE�___J
STM
ST. 3111
-
-
TR.II
_. _..
TR.tO
_i
T,
_ ....__..
...
'
......_..
IVIL
RS -3
J
o C 6
A
_.,
•TM tT tr
j I
C13
m
S 4 a
SR14 __ ....
0W0110M DON
QED
5r —ur— it
- - --- III
RMH-6 TO RS -3
J
DEC 16 BOOK 66 PAKH 695
REZONING 6_79 ACRES TO IG - BET. OLD DIXIE & RR, SO. OF 1ST ST.SW
The hour of 9:30 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to -wit:
VER® BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
A., n 1 r,
a
in the matter ofliC
in the % Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newsaaoer.
Swor
(SEAL)
-NOTICE —PUBLIC HEARING
Notice oOrdinrance rezoning lanjo consider dafrom CH,
tion Of
a CHeaounty Comm
trial District. The property is presently, General
by
Ed Schirit, trustee and Is. located seat, of. Old'
.
Dixie Highway. west of P.E.G Railro4 SPP ,
mately 2nd Street S W
The subleet property is described ai
northeastat art '/4ofthe section P4a, Towns114 hip 33
South, Range 39 East lying west of the
Florida East Coast Railroad and being
more particularly described as begin-
ning at a point 329.12 feet south and ...
1072.78 east of the northwest,comer of
said northeast '/. of the northeast
Said point lying on the West right of way
of the Florida East Coast Railroad, C;
thence run southeast,riy along said }
right of way a distance of 673.56 fear
thence run west along a line 348 8 fnorth of the South eet
tine of said no In
of the northeast's'/+ a distance of 450 l
feet thence run northwesterly and Parak
191 to said west right of Way of the Florida :, I
East Coast Railroad a distance o1674 -
feet;
674 feet; thence run east a distance of 450
Wet to the said west right of wey of the I
Florida East Coast Railroad antl point of
beginning. Said land tying and being in
Florida.
Indian River County; Containing
6.79 acre$.
A public hearing at which Parfil as sin intoor st be
` and citizens shall .have an opPo hY
heard, will be held by the Board of County Com--
miesioners of Indian River County. Florida, in the
County Commission Chambers of the County
Administration Building, located at 1840 25h St..,.
Vero Beach, Florida. on Tuesday: December.
1986, at 9:30 a.m.
The Board of County Commissioners may.;
grant a rezoning to a less intense zoning district'
than the district requested Provided it withal+.
the same general use category. al an rle¢isstYiA:
Anyone who may wish to apps
which may be me e.at this meeting w�il_ wi is
iensure that a s made whichainc includes the testimontim record of the yocaenaddi "wings,
dente upon which the appeal is based ���'',;
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
-s-Don C. Scurlock
Chairman
Nov. 24,1986
Chief Planner Shearer made the staff recommendation, as
follows:
56
CM
TO: The Honorable Members ®ATE: December 4, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners -
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
SUBJECT:
Ro ert . r . Keatip.g, CP
Planning & Developm6nt Director
ED SCHLITT REQUEST TO RE-
ZONE 6.79 ACRES FROM CH,
HEAVY COMMERCIAL DIS-
TRICT, TO IG, GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
FROM: Richard M. Shearer, REFERENCES:
Chief, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting ofDecember16, 1986.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Mr. Ed Schlitt, trustee, is requesting to rezone approximately
6.79 acres located 450 feet east of Old Dixie Highway, south of
1st Street SW, and west of the F.E.C. railroad from CH, Heavy
Commercial District, to IG, General Industrial District.
The applicant proposes to develop the subject property for a
cement plant.
On November 13, 1986, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
6 -to -0 to recommend approval of this --request.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli-
cation will be presented.- The analysis will include a descrip-
tion of the current and future land uses of the site and sur-
rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and
utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ-
mental.quality.
Existinq Land Use Pattern
The subject property and the land south and west of it is
undeveloped. North of the subject property is a cement plant
zoned IG. East of the subject property across the F.E.C.
Railroad, is undeveloped land zoned CH. Further east, across
U.S. 1, is a savings and loan and vacant land zoned OCR, Office,
Commercial and Residential District, and Vista Royale zoned
RM -10, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 10
units/acre).
Future Land Use Pattern
,The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property and all of
the land immediately adjacent to it as part of the U.S. 1 MXD,
Mixed -Use Districta-(up to 6 units/acre).
The proposed IG zoning is a natural continuation of the existing
• IG zoning to the north. Moreover, the subject property is -
surrounded on the other three sides by CH zoning which will
provide a land use buffer between the subject property and
surrounding less intense land uses.
Transportation Svstem
The subject property will have indirect access to Old Dixie
Highway (classified as a secondary collector on the County's
Thoroughfare Plan). The maximum development of the subject
property under IG zoning could generate up to 489 average annual
daily trips (AADT). Under the current CH zoning, the maximum
57
DEC 16 1986 BOOK 66 P"iF. � �
0 E 0 16 1986 Bou 6 6 Fair. 697
development of the subject property could generate up to 458
AADT. Old Dixie Highway currently carries 7,500 AADT in this
area at Level -of -Service "C". The additional traffic which could
be generated under the proposed IG zoning would not diminish this
level -of -service.
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally
sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area.
T7L .'. 1 _* 1 J, - _
County watermains are located on the westside of U.S. 1 and the
westside of Old Dixie Highway in this area.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, including the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation, staff recommends approval.
Commissioner Bowman inquired how they are going to access
the property, and Chief Planner Shearer advised that they own all
the way to old Dixie and they will create a road to the site.
This is a heavy commercial area.
The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard.
There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 86-86 rezoning 6.79 acres to IG as re-
quested by Ed Schlitt.
58
ORDINANCE NO. 86-86 -
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP
FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING
FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the
local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing
and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning
request; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has determined
that this rezoning is in conformance with the Land Use Element of
the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has held a public
hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning of
the following described property situated in Indian River County,
Florida, to -wit:
That part of the northeast j of the northeast j of Section
24, Township 33 South, Range 39 East lying west of the
Florida East Coast Railroad and being more particularly
described as beginning at a point 329.12 feet south and
1072.78 east of the northwest corner of said northeast j of
the northeast J. Said point lying on the west right of way
of the Florida East Coast Railroad; thence run southeasterly
along said right of way a distance of 673.56 feet; thence
run west along a line 346.8 feet north of the south line of
said northeast $ of the northeast J a distance of 450 feet;
thence run northwesterly and parallel to said west right of
way of the Florida East Coast Railroad a distance of 674.57
feet; thence run east a distance of 450 feet to the said
west right of way of the Florida East Coast Railroad and
point of beginning. Said land lying and being in Indian
River County, Florida. Containing 6.79 acres.
Be changed from CG, General Commercial District, to IG, General
Industrial District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and
described in said Zoning Regulations.
59
DEC 1 1986 ��oox
F77-
DEC IF, 1986
BOOK 699
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida on this 16th day
of December , 1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
By / G
Don Scur ock, Jr., Chairman
01 1 2 14
Id Cl L
AC[
P K
1 2 3 4 S
C.
N LAM
S B VI I N
14 13 12 11 10 9 S
CH
A
1 ST ST. c
if iris
'•1 o 4 1L 3F14 4i4 -
::�;• b 11 413 6=6C
TAT
•
_ f � 62
y • f • O -
RS -
0 1 • • — - �.. 60 51 6.
• -40&01 AAtA + 59 .1 PNr54 3
Subject cn i1156
� 58
w , 9:i. •
._. .,1 z �:. q "�.� . .., t • 37
PL
s
ProperJOCR 1
j,
21to sT. sw G
sus%. c.n.fHy::•,"�",',"�;,,�
.! UNIT I
_ AAt•
RM -10
6
-3R0 /T- Ste - ��
0 11 1 +
WMI
�� ♦ C `�
47J 3110 PL.SN� 1 1
14 1- ' 9 !7 W C eOLTe . .!• sot• At
V t/• > I _ AAIA VISTA agTALE
» 'oGUP11T z , CONDO ,
60.
REZONING .06 ACRES AT CR 510 & A -1-A TO CG (GORDON NUTT)
The hour of 9:30 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to -wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
- — / r
a
In the matter of
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as. second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida,•for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
R
(SEAL) I l \
o v 1— vn 1 vvu.a, nw 11 "-Vi vvunly, rwnual
.;
NOTICE —PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of hearing to consider the adoption of, -
a County Ordinance rezoning land from: RM -6,
Multiple -Family Residential District to = Gen-
eral Commercial District. The subject property is'
presently owned by Gordon S. Nutt and is 10-
cated east of S.R. AIA, and south of Wabasso
Beach Road.
The subject property Is described as
THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT w;,v, _
2, SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 31. SOUTK ';' 14
-AND RANGE 39 -EAST LYING EAST OF �•
STATE ROAD AIA:: SAID LAND NOW
LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN. RIVER
°>rCOUNTY, FLORIDA.,,T a3
A public hearing at which parties in interest
and citizens shall have an opportunity to be
heard, will be held by the Board of County Com-.
missioners of Indian River County, Floridan in1he
County Commission Chambers of the County
Administratiop Building, located at 1840 25th St_
-^Vero Beach, Florida an Tuesday, December I6,•
•1986, at 9:30 a.m.
The Board of CountyCommissioners• may
grant a rezoning to a less intense zoning district
'than the district requested provided it is withirr
the same general use category. if
Anyone who may wish to appeal an decislon
which may be made at this meeting wlil need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is;made which includes the testimony and evi
dance upon which the appeal is based.
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
-s-Don C. Scurlock, Jr
Chairman
;,: Nov. 24.1988
Chief Planner Shearer made the following presentation:
61
DEC 16 1986
FF1,__ � -7
DEC 1 �- 1986
BOOK 66 uu� 701
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: December 4, 1986 FILE:
of the Board of County
Commissioners -
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Y11- SUBJECT: GORDON NUTT REQUEST TO
Robert M. Keati g,- CP REZONE .06 ACRES FROM
Planning & Development Director RM -6, MULTIPLE -FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO
CG, GENERAL COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT
FROM:Richard M. Shearer, REFERENCES:
Chief, Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of December 16, 1986.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
Gordon Nutt, the owner, is requesting to rezone approximately .06
acres located on the south side of County Road 510 (Wabasso Road)
and the east side of State Road A -1-A from RM -6, Multiple -Family
Residential District (up to 6 units/acre) to CG, General
Commercial District.
The subject property is part of a larger parcel of land which has
received conditional site plan approval for a resort hotel.
On November 13, 1986, the Planning - and Zoning Commission voted
6 -to -0 to recommend approval of this request.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the appli-
cation will be presented. The analysis will include a descrip-
tion of the current and future land uses of the site and sur-
rounding areas, potential impacts on the transportation and
utility systems, and any significant adverse impacts on environ-
mental quality.
Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject property is currently undeveloped. North of the
subject property are two commercial buildings and the Wabasso
Beach Park zoned CN, Neighborhood Commercial District. Further
north, is Summerplace Subdivision consisting of vacant lots and
single-family dwellings zoned RS -6, Single -Family Residential
District (up to 6 units/acre). East and southeast of the subject
property is the undeveloped site of the proposed resort hotel and
part of the Wabasso Beach Park zoned CG. West of the subject
property, across S.R. A -1-A, is undeveloped land zoned RM -6.
Northwest of the subject property are two vacant lots zoned CN,
and single-family residences and vacant lots in Summerplace
Subdivision zoned RS -6. Further west is Oceanaire Heights
subdivision which contains duplexes, single-family residences and
vacant lots zoned RT -6, Two -Family Residential District.
Future Land Use Pattern
The Comprehensive Plan designates a 25 acre tourist/ commercial
node at the intersection of State Road A -1-A and County Road 512.
Currently, there are approximately 19 acres of commercially -zoned
land in this node. The land surrounding the node area is
designated as LD -2, Low -Density Residential 2 (up to 6
units/acre).
62
M
The subject -property is not suitable for residential development
because of its small size, triangular shape, and because it is
situated between A -1-A and commercially -zoned property.
Transportation System
The subject property will have access from A -1-A (classified as
an arterial street on the Thoroughfare Plan). No additional
traffic is expected as a direct result of this proposed rezoning.
Environment
The subject property is not designated as environmentally
sensitive nor is it in a flood -prone area.`
Utilities ,
The subject property is located within the North Beach Utilities
franchise service area.
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the above analysis, including the Planning and Zoning
Commission's recommendation, staff recommends approval.
VU%.0 r► um 4 ....m \_ \_
_ 9 10 9 4 2 \
7 12 7 T 8 7 8 9 10 11
9 \
L- 6 I3 6 a 6 7 t '2 3 4 3
S 14 S1rS 6 5 4 3 2 I 6
iaaTRORaa
ebd
e€fils
Subject -[\
Property
.7
63
SUM MERPLACE
SUBDIVISION
Z
i
n
C G v,
BOOK
1
_r .
DEC 10, 1986 BOOK 6 k 793
F'�: u C
Chief Planner Shearer explained that the small triangular
configuration of this property is due to its being part of a
government lot, which government lot line runs straight north and
south and bisects A -I -A. This triangle is the only part of the
government lot which is east of A -I -A, and when the undeveloped
land west of A -I -A was rezoned to RM -6, it was done based on the
government lot line description, which inadvertently included the
little triangle east of A -I -A.
Commissioner Bowman wished to know if neighborhood commer-
cial wouldn't allow a parking lot, and Chief Planner Shearer
explained that this parking lot is an accessory use to a hotel
and hotels are not allowed in neighborhood commercial zoning
districts.
Attorney Chuck McKinnon with the law firm of McKinnon,
Stewart 6 Nall, came before the Board representing Gordon Nutt,
owner of the subject property. He stressed that the property,
because of its size and shape, cannot be used for anything unless
it is used in conjunction with the other property owned by Mr.
Nutt, and, therefore, unless the rezoning is granted, the
property will, in effect, have no use whatsoever.
Commissioner Bowman inquired the exact dimensions of the
property, and Planner Shearer believed the longest dimension is
about 100'.
Chairman Scurlock believed the key to the issue is that by
rezoning consistent with the land, it can count in all the
density calculations.
Commissioner Bowman asked if Mr. Nutt is lacking parking and
Commissioner Bird felt he just wants to tie this land in with his
other property so that it is usable.
Attorney McKinnon confirmed that they just want to add two
parking spaces there.
The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard.
There were none.
64
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 86-87 rezoning .06 acres at CR 510 and
A -1-A to CG as requested by Gordon Nutt.
ORDINANCE NO. 86-87
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING
THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP
FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING
FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the
local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing
and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning -
request; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has determined
that this rezoning is in conformance with the Land Use Element of
the Comprehensive Plan of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners has held a public
hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning of
the following described property situated in Indian River County,
Florida, to -wit:
THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 31
SOUTH AND RANGE 39 EAST LYING EAST OF STATE ROAD AlA. SAID
LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Be changed from RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District, to
CG, General Commercial District.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and
described in said Zoning Regulations.
65
BOOK F'AGE 704
DEC 1 M6
Boa 6 6 F'i� E 705
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida on this 16th day '
of December , 1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY 3�L
Don C. Scurf cc, Jr., airman
ORDINANCE - LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN LIEU OF IMPACT FEES
The hour of 9:45 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to -wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Weekly
NOTICE.
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
Ttie following matter will be considered by the
Board County Commissioners Public
of at a
Hearing scheduled, for 8:45 a.m. on Tuesday,
December 18.19116:.
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE
STATE OF FLORIDA
ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
USE OF CERTAIN LOCAL IMPROVE -
MENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF, '
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a weekly newspaper published
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND SPECIAL -
at Vero Beach in Indian River Count ,Florida; that the attached c g
Y opy of advertisement, bein
ASSESSMENTS IN LIEU OF IMPACT
I FEES; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE- '
BONDS PAYABLE FROM SPECIAL.:,
ASSESSMENTS, SPECIAL ASSESS-,
a 2 /
MENTS IN LIEU OF IMPACT FEES, SPE-.
CIAL ASSESSMENTS AND/OR SPE- '
CIAL ASSESSMENTS IN LIEU OF IM-
PACT FEES IMPOSED BY OTHER PUB -
in the matter of
LIC BODIES AND -PAYABLE TO THE
COUNTY PURSUANT TO AN INTERr,"...__
.
<: GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AND.",'
AT THE. OPTION OF THE COUNTY,--•:
FROM OTHER LEGALLY. AVAILABLE'.,:
NON ADMALOREM FUNDS; AUTHORIZ-. x':-'.
ING THE COUNTY TO ENTER INTO——'
CERTAIN ' •- INTERGOVERNMENTAL
in theAGREEMENTS
Court, was pub-
WITH PUBLIC BODIES
LOCATED WITHIN ITS TERRITORIAL'
BOUNDARIES; AND PROVIDING FOR
�j
fished in said newspaper in the issues of ��d -�
AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THIS ORDI
NANCE
Anyone who may wish to appeal any declaion'
which may be made at this meeting will need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made, which includes testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is based.
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Nov. 28,1866_, �1
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, weekly and has been entered
as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida
for a period of one year next preceeding the first publication of the attached copy of adver-
tisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or
corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this adver-
tisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me is a� day of� A.D.
(SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian
66
a
Attorney Vitunac explained this is an ordinance that we
requested our own bond counsel to draw up which would be used in
the Sebastian sewer projectand would allow special assessment in
lieu of impact fees to be a valid purpose for issuing of bonds.
That is the procedure we have been discussing with Sebastian
whereby people voluntarily agree to pay the County impact fee for
their sewer system instead of having an actual assessment placed
against their property by the value of the front feet, etc.
Commissioner Eggert asked if we don't permit all this now,
and Attorney Vitunac noted that this ordinance would authorize
this procedure to be used anywhere, not just Sebastian. We have
a county standard assessment resolution, but he felt it would be
better if the ordinance mentioned the procedure precisely and so
did bond counsel.
Commissioner Wheeler requested that the Attorney clarify the
advantage of impact fees versus special assessment, and Attorney
Vitunac explained that with this method as a source for bonding,
it would allow 1,000 or more different people to get the benefit
of a 20 year payment of their $1,250.
Chairman Scurlock felt the key is that our impact fees are
insufficient for us to fund up front. This procedure allows us
to get the money up front and do the improvement, and the
individual then can pay over a period of time.
Commissioner Eggert raised a question as to whether notice
is to be sent by certified mail, and Attorney Vitunac stated that
unless the ordinance specifically calls for certified mail,
notice will be sent by regular mail as has been our policy.
Commissioner Eggert asked if this ever has caused a problem,
and the Chairman advised that it has not because so far this all
has been of a voluntary nature. He stated that he would have no
objection to requiring certified notice.
Attorney Vitunac pointed out thatwnre might have to send out
a thousand letters and this could be very expensive. In any
event notice is published and an affidavit is required that
67
DEC16 1986 1
DOOM 66 F 79
v
DEC
16 1986
BOOK
6
u -) 797
letters of notice have been sent.
He informed the
Board
there
J_
were two typos in the ordinance and it was reprinted.
Commissioner Bird felt it would have been helpful if the
Board had been provided with some kind of a cover letter re-
viewing the proposed ordinance, and other Board members agreed.
Commissioner Bird further felt that the ordinance title was
extremely lengthy and cumbersome.
Attorney Vitunac explained that this ordinance is mainly to
assure bonds can be sold on this basis without any problem, and
he felt a few extra words here will save us trouble later.
Commissioner Bowman had some typos that she stated she would
discuss with Attorney Vitunac after the meeting.
The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard.
There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously closed
the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 86-88 providing for the levy of special
assessments in lieu of impact fees, authorizing the
issuance of bonds payable from special assessments, etc.
ORDINANCE NO. 86 - 8 8
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUN'T'Y, FLORIDA, RELATING TO
THE ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF CERTAIN FOCAL
IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN LIEU OF IMPACT FEES; AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS PAYABLE FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS,
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN LIEU OF IMPACT FEES, SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS AND/OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN LIEU OF IMPACT
FEES IMPOSED BY OTHER PUBLIC BODIES AND PAYABLE TO THE
COUNTY PURSUANT TO AN INTERGOVEIeZENIAL AGREEMENT AND, AT
THE OPTION OF THE COUNTY, FROM C►TTHER LEGALLY AVAILABLE NON
AD VALOREM FUNDS; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY TO ENTER INTO
CERTAIN TTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS WITH PUBLIC BODIES
LOCATE WITHIN ITS TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES; AND PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THIS ORDINANCE.
ORDINANCE 86-88 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD IN
ITS ENTIRETY.
I.R.BOULEVARD PROJECT - 6TH AVENUE R/W ACQUISITION
The Board reviewed memo of Right -of -Way Agent Don Finney:
TO: THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF DATE: December 5, 1986 FILE:
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THROUGH:
Charles P. Balczun
County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard
Project - 6th Avenue Right of
Way Acquisition, Parcel #103
FROM: Donald G. Finney, SRA REFERENCES:
Right of Way Agent�'�
d
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The property owners are willing to sell the 15' x 110' right of
way (1,650 sq. ft.) at the $2.50 sq. ft. appraised value of $4,125.00.
Additionally the county would relocate the oak trees and shrubs off
the right of way, however Mr. George Collins, Trustee and attorney for
the property owners is willing to settle for $100.00 for the hedge and
$750.00 attorney fee.
$4,125.00 Land taken
100.00 Hedge
750.00 Attorney fees
$4,975.00 FULL COMPENSATION
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING
Staff requests authorization to purchase the above parcel #103 at
the appraised value, pay the property owner for the hedge and the
owner's attorney fee for representing the owners for a total
compensation of $4,975.00
Public Works Director Davis noted that we have been very
active in securing right-of-way for this project for the last 11
years. Now, however, in the last stage of this acquisition
it appears that more and more attorneys are getting involved. He
believed property owners are having attorneys because they know
it won't cost them anything, and it seems some of the attorney's
fees get quite expensive. In this particular case, Director
Davis felt a $750 attorney's fee is quite a bit and that possibly
we should have an itemized bill. He further noted that this has
become a statewide issue, and some are taking the position that
69
BOOK 66 f,,vuE 708
DEC 16 1986 Boor 66 m,)E 'j09
the attorney's fee should represent a percentage of the payment
obtained above the appraised value.
Attorney Vitunac noted that the County has to pay reasonable
attorney's fees for the property owners, and if the Board doesn't
feel the fees are reasonable, we can raise that issue and
bargain.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to purchase the above parcel at the appraised
value and pay for the hedge subject to the County
Attorney attempting to negotiate the Attorney's fee.
SCHAUB COMMUNITIES COUNTRY CLUB - RELEASE OF UTILITIES TO CITY -OF
VERO BEACH
The Board reviewed memo from the Utilties Department:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1986
THRU: CHARLES P. BALCZUN, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
VIA: TERRANCE G. PINTO, DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
FROM: JEFFREY A. BOONE, ENGINEERING OPERATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT: SCHAUB COMMUNITIES COUNTRY CLUB/RELEASE OF UTILITIES
TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH
BACKGROUND
The Schaub Community Country Club located on State Road A -1-A south of
Highway 510 is technically in Indian River County but, is surrounded
by the Town of Indian River Shores. The Division of Utility Services
has no facilities in the area; furthermore, the subject property is
located outside the service areas of all utility companies franchised
by the County.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is located just south of Indian River Trails
Subdivision, which is illegally served water and wastewater by utility
companies franchised by the County. The only viable option is for the
City of Vero Beach to provide water and wastewater service to the
subject project.
RECOMMENDATION
The Division of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners release the subject property from the County Utility
service area and approve water and wastewater service by the City of
Vero Beach.
70
Commissioner Eggert understood the need to release the
subject property, but hoped in doing so there is no implication
of any kind of approval of the country club.
Chairman Scurlock agreed this is a more complex issue than
just release of utility service and also was not sure the City
will accept it.
Utilities Director Pinto informed the Board that the City of
Vero Beach has indicated they will service the area and, in fact,
they passed some sort of resolution agreeing to service Indian
River Shores to the north boundary.
Commissioner Bird wondered if it is premature to release
this until we know if the project will be approved in its final
form, but Director Pinto emphasized that there is no possible way
the County ever will serve that property.
Commissioner Wheeler believed that the City of Vero Beach
has worked out an agreement with Indian River Shores to service
everything to the north City limits. He did not see a problem
with releasing this portion and did not feel it has any bearing
on the upcoming dispute re the country club.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously accepted
staff recommendation to release the subject property
from the County Utility service area for service by
the City of Vero Beach.
PARTIAL RELEASE OF FUNDS - COASTLINE UTILITIES
Assistant Utilities Director Barton reviewed the following
memo, noting that this has gone on so long, staff would just like
. permission to negotiate this out and pay it off.
71
BOOK 6 6 FeliL
DEC 16 1986
BOOK 66 F.4r
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1986
THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO, DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICE
FROM: �� JEFFREY K. BARTON, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: PARTIAL RELEASE OF FUNDS HELD PER MEETING OF
AUGUST 6, 1986
BACKGROUND
At your meeting of August 6, 1986, (attachment), the Board of County
Commissioners approved the holding of $9,202.70 from final payment for
engineering services preformed after the deadline date of the
Coastline Utility contract. Through the review process of the parties
it was determined that the project was substantially complete on the
deadline date. Our engineers have revised their figures as to what
should be charged against the Coastline contract on Route 60. The
following is a breakdown:
$9,202.70 Original Holdback
less $3,747.80 Revised Engineer's Holdback
$5,454.90 Funds to be released
RECOMMENDATION
County Utility Staff recommends the following actions to the Board of
County Commissioners:
1) Approve the release of $5,454.90 to Coastline Utilities
for the difference between the engineers holdback letters
2) The engineers have been given until December 30, 1986 to
provide complete backup to Coastline Utilities for the
$3,747.80 still in question. These requests have continued
to go back and forth -since August, 1986.
Staff feels the time to backup the engineers claim has taken too long
and if request is not completed by the December 30, 1986 date,
Coastline Utilities should not be further penalized and the Commission
should authorize payment of $3,747.80, the balance due to Coastline,
at that time.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved the
recommendation of staff as set out above.
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT - CARDINAL INDUSTRIES/CITRUS WOOD APTS.
The Board reviewed memo of Utility staff member Jeff Boone:
72
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DATE: December 1, 1986
THRU: CHARLES P. BALCZUN, ADMINISTRATOR
VIA: TERRANCE G. PINTO, DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICE
FROM: JEFFREY A. BOONE, ENGINEERING OPERATIONS MANAGE&R�X�_
DIVISION OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: CARDINAL INDUSTRIES/CITRUS WOOD APARTMENTS
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT/LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF 8TH STREET AND 6TH AVENUE
BACKGROUND
The Division of Utility Services has required certain onsite and
offsite water and wastewater facilities to be oversized to meet
County master plan requirements. In particular, an 8 -inch offsite
water main was required by the water system master plan to be 12
inches in diameter. Likewise, the Division of Utility Services
required the onsite lift station to be installed deeper to serve the
surrounding properties, as per the wastewater master plan.
ANALYSIS
Attached for your review and approval are five copies of the subject
Developers Agreement, outlining the allowable reimbursement for
oversizing of utilities amounting to $10,270.00. As outlined in the
Agreement, the Developer shall be reimbursed with 500 of all impact
fees collected from the subject project and any surrounding
properties who connect within five years of acceptance of the
improvements by the Division of Utility Services, not to exceed the
$10,270.00 allowable reimbursement.
RECOMMENDATION
The Division of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County
Commissioners approve and execute the accompanying Developers
Agreement with Cardinal Industries, Inc. for the Citrus Wood
Apartments project.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved
the Developers Agreement with Cardinal Industries
for the Citrus Wood Apartments project and authorized
the signature of the Chairman.
73 BOCK 66 ir4:UC -112
DEC 1 � ��
D E e�
600K 6� ` ,r IIJ
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AND
CARDINAL INDUSTRIES. INC.
Granting reimbursements for oversizing certain on site
and off site utilities required by the County.
THIS AGREEMENT made this 16th day of December ,1986 b
__ Y
and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the
State of Florida, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960,
(County), and CARDINAL INDUSTRIES, INC., 3701 South Sanford Avenue,
Post Office Box U, Sanford, Florida 32772, (Developer);
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Developer, in conjunction with the construction of
of Citrus Wood Apartments is extending on and off site water and
wastewater facilities to serve the subject project; and
WHEREAS, the County has required the Developer to oversize
certain on site and off site utility improvements to serve the
regional area and has agreed to reimburse the Developer for the cost
of oversizing these on site and off site utilities;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and
other good and valuable consideration, the County and Developer
agree as follows:
1. The Developer shall construct all necessary on site and
off site utilities, including oversizing necessary to serve the
subject project and surrounding area. The County agrees to
reimburse the Developer for the oversizing of on site and off site
utilities as outlined below:
r
IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVEMENT
ALLOWABLE
REQUIRED BY
REQUIRED BY
UNIT
TOTAL
COUNTY
PROJECT
QUANTITY REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
12" OFF SITE
8" OFF SITE
$2/IN. OF
WATER MAIN
WATER MAIN
1240 LF OVERSIZING/FT.
$9,920.00
ON SITE LIFT
STATION WET
WELL BOTTOM
BOTTOM
$100/FT.
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
OF
-7.46
-3.96
3.5 FT. DEPTH
$ 350.00
$10,270.00
74
2. The County shall reimburse the Developer with 50% of all
impact fees collected from surrounding properties who connect to the
portion of water and/or wastewater systems constructed by the
Developer in conjunction with the Citrus Wood Apartments project
during the first five years after. acceptance of the subject
construction by the County, not to exceed the total allowable
reimbursement of $10,270.00.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Developer have caused
these presents to be executed in their names the day and year first
above written.
ATTEST:
CARDINAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
By:
Vice Ptesident�& General Malager
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By%LC 66 By: �.•.. G.
e aa,WripI f-
C erk Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Chairman
SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE - TEMPORARY RATE STRUCTURE. CLUB HOUSE
Administrator Balczun advised that staff was not quite ready
to discuss this matter in depth today.
Intergovernmental Relations Director Thomas stated that he
could provide some update. The bids were opened on the cart
paths Friday; the high bid was Walker Construction at $136,000
and the low bid of Damon Construction at $120,000 was $20,000
over our original estimate. However, the OMB Director advised
him that by proceeding with the temporary clubhouse, we should
have sufficient funds. Staff has been talking with Golf Manager
Komarinetz in regard to the possibility of cutting back on any of
the cart paths and recommending that the low bid be accepted.
The bids went out on the bridges and should be opened in two
weeks. Director Thomas continued that he spoke with the person
who bought Grover Fletcher's house moving business in regard to
moving the temporary clubhouse, and he will move it for $7,500.
75
DEC 16 1986 BOOK Ful714
J
DEC 1 f� 1966
EQGK 66 f'D;1-- 715
Commissioner Bird believed that the Administrator and
Director Thomas also have been working on other aspects of moving
the temporary structure, and he wondered about the final costs.
Director Thomas reported that Planning is putting it through "
an administrative site plan approval, and Lynn Williams,
Supervisor of Buildings and Grounds, feels his crew can handle
the foundation and do the interior work. He noted that they are
a fine crew and did a fine job on the concession stand at
Kiwanis-Hobart Park.
The Chairman felt we will be able to do this for less than
$15,000 total.
CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS
Administrator Balczun informed the Board that in trying to
be consistent with the other Constitutional Officers and public
agencies in the area, he would like to propose that we not open
for business on the Friday following Christmas nor on the Friday
following New Year's Day.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, that the County offices be closed on
the Fridays following Christmas Day and New Year's Day.
Commissioner Bird inquired as to the number of paid holidays
this would total this year and the extra cost, and Administrator
Balczun advised it would be 11. He noted that actually there is
no cash difference, and he did feel it is better that we be
closed on those days.
Commissioner Bird agreed this year is a unique situation and
felt we would not be setting a precedent. The Chairman agreed.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
on and carried unanimously.
76
It was voted
HOWELL-CHAPMAN PARCEL ACQUISITION UPDATE
Assistant County Attorney Barkett reviewed the following
memo:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
DATE: December 10, 1986
SUBJECT: Howell -Chapman Parcel Acquisition Update
FROM: Bruce Barkett
Assistant County Attorney
Facts:
At the November 25th Board of County Commissioners' meeting
this office presented the Board with the November, 1986
Armfield-Wagner appraised value of the above -referenced
parcel of beach -front property. The parcel is on the Save
Our Coast State project list, and the State has reserved
$2.5 million to contribute toward purchase of the property.
Coincidentally, the appraisal reflected a $2.5 million value
for the property, and the Board authorized me to submit to
the seller an offer to purchase the parcel for $2.5 million.
Such an offer was transmitted, and the deadline for a
response has passed without word from the seller.
Previously the seller offered to sell the parcel for $3.6
million.
The original appraisal was based upon a dollar amount of
$1,812 per ocean front foot, and the appraiser estimated the
parcel to have 1,380 front feet. A corrected appraisal has
been submitted reflecting the property's true front footage
on the ocean, which is 1,462 front feet, and a dollar amount
of $1,847 per front foot, making the corrected appraised
value $2.7 million.
Options:
This item is put before the Board for guidance. Two options
are presented:
1. Amend the offer to $2.7 million. The County would
contribute $200,000.00 but would get in return management
and use of a $2.7 million ocean -front park which completes a
gap between other properties purchased for park use. The
seller could be given one week to respond to the offer.
2. Go to condemnation immediately. The County would be
responsible for the seller's attorney's fees whether or not
we chose to pay for the parcel according to the fair market
value as determined by the court.
Recommendation:
Option Number 1 is recommended simply because exercise of it
does not preclude use of condemnation if the offer is
rejected. Further, a negotiated sale would save the County
the seller's attorney's fees.
77
J t?
Boor;. 66'
the trustee for the owner of this property, and he is concerned
about getting a fair appraisal and fair market value. The owner
does realize it can be taken by eminent domain, but if he does
his own appraisal, he will undoubtedly realize the first
appraisal was incorrect.
Chairman Scurlock stated that he would like to offer the 2.7
million and if that fails, go to condemnation. He did not know
where we will get the money to make up the difference, but did
not feel we can have enough oceanfront.
Commissioner Bird agreed and emphasized that this would give
us around 3,000 continuous feet of oceanfront for only $200,000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to amend the offer to 2.7 million, and if that
is not accepted, go to condemnation.
Attorney Barkett reported that he has been informed by the
attorney for the Board of Trustees in Tallahassee that so many
counties around the state are trying to close their property
deals for tax reasons that the current bond issue is about to run
out; the state will release this money and reacquire it by March.
The money is still guaranteed, and we have to initiate condemna-
tion by April 1st in any event.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE - SUMMARY OF ACTIONS
Commissioner Bowman reviewed the following summary:
78
BOOK
117
Attorney Barkett
advised that he has been in contact with
the trustee for the owner of this property, and he is concerned
about getting a fair appraisal and fair market value. The owner
does realize it can be taken by eminent domain, but if he does
his own appraisal, he will undoubtedly realize the first
appraisal was incorrect.
Chairman Scurlock stated that he would like to offer the 2.7
million and if that fails, go to condemnation. He did not know
where we will get the money to make up the difference, but did
not feel we can have enough oceanfront.
Commissioner Bird agreed and emphasized that this would give
us around 3,000 continuous feet of oceanfront for only $200,000.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to amend the offer to 2.7 million, and if that
is not accepted, go to condemnation.
Attorney Barkett reported that he has been informed by the
attorney for the Board of Trustees in Tallahassee that so many
counties around the state are trying to close their property
deals for tax reasons that the current bond issue is about to run
out; the state will release this money and reacquire it by March.
The money is still guaranteed, and we have to initiate condemna-
tion by April 1st in any event.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE - SUMMARY OF ACTIONS
Commissioner Bowman reviewed the following summary:
78
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMITTEE
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS
DECEMBER 10, 1986
1. PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS - US#1 at 45th Street
Committee recommended approval of staff recommendations to
remove pedestrian signals on two of the four legs of the
intersection due to non-use. Signals will remain to assist
crossing of US#1 and 45th Street on the north and east legs
corresponding to planned sidewalks.
2. US#1 DRAINAGE OUTFALL - ROCKRIDGE SUBDIVISION
Committee recommended that FDOT be petitioned to proceed
without further delay the improvement of the US#1 drainage
outfall parallel to 16th Street/Rockridge Blvd.
3. AlA THREE-LANING IN INDIAN RIVER SHORES
Committee agreed with staff recommendation to permit a
developer to apply impact fee money towards the expansion of
the developer's portion of the three-laning of AlA between
Indian Trails Drive and south of Bay,Tree to improve roadway
design consistency. The committee also directed staff to
develop a long-range improvement plan for AlA between Indian
River Shores and CR -510.
4. FLORIDA HIGH SPEED RAIL PROJECT
Staff briefed the committee on the project. The committee
took no action, but requested that they be kept -informed
about the rail project.
5. 1987 FDOT FUNCTIONAL RECLASSIFICATION
Staff informed the committee that the FDOT is proposing to
give 27th Avenue (SR -607) to the County. Discussion was
tabled until the next meeting due to the absence of a FDOT
representative.
6. KING'S HIGHWAY (58th AVENUE) CORRIDOR STUDY
The committee directed staff to proceed with a corridor
study of 58th Avenue between Oslo Road and SR -60.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved Item #1.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized the
Chairman to send a letter to the FDOT as set out in
Item #2.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved
the three-laning of A -1-A as set out in Item #3.
79
BOOS
D E D 16 1906
BOOK 66
Items #4 and #5 did not require Board action.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved staff
proceeding with a corridor study of 58th Avenue
between Oslo Road and SR 60 - Item #6.
GIFFORD COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE
Commissioner Bird informed the Board that he asked for a
meeting last week of the principals involved with the Gifford
Community Center to determine the present status of the situa-
tion. Ralph Lundy and Walter Jackson were present representing
the Gifford Progressive Civic League and Sam Hunter, James Burns,
and Ken Evitt, were there representing the School Board. Also
present were Mike Miller of the Planning Department and Jeff
Barton of County Utilities. Since PECO funds are involved, the
project is falling under the School Board, and Sam Hunter is
working directly with Architect Charles Block; Lloyd & Associates
have been retained for the engineering work.
Commissioner Bird continued that as of now the project is
planned to be a building of some 8,700 sq. ft, which includes an
additional wing. The estimated building cost is $400,000, plus
the site work, furnishings and utilities for $100,000, or a total
of $500,000. So far there are funds in hand of $250,000 in PECO
funds and $30,000 in local contributions. The Progressive League
is involved in a fund solicitation drive and are very optimistic
that they can raise t•he additional $250,000 needed to complete
the project; in fact, they are even hoping to get it by the first
of the year. If they cannot raise the needed funds, the project
will be scaled down to meet the budget. There is a timetable that
has to be met in order to receive the PECO funds and also a
timetable involved with the reverter of the property to Indian
River Shores. Commissioner Bird felt our legal department needs
to be working on the necessary paperwork for the various
80
transfers as he. believed we either need to deed or long term
lease the property to the School Board. The School Board is
saying that as soon as the building is completed, they would
prefer to void the lease and return the building and the land to
the county and the county could have a lease with the League.
Chairman Scurlock inquired whether the School Board took the
position that they would not contribute any -additional funds to
this capital project.
Commissioner Bird advised that Superintendent Burns wrote a
memo indicating he did not feel there were any capital funds --
available for them to contribute to this project this year, and
Commissioner Bird advised that on behalf of the Board, he pointed
out that it was a very lean year for the county also and while he
felt we might be able to assist with some maintenance, we cannot
commit ourselves to anything at this point.
The Chairman asked Administrator Balczun if we have any
additional money we might be able to commit to this project, and
Administrator Balczun stated that we do not this year, and he
doubted that we would be in that position in the next year or the
year after because of some of the very large projects we are
already committed to.
Commissioner Wheeler wished to know why the county is in-
volved in this at this point and why we don't just give the
property back to Indian River Shores and let them deal with the
School Board, especially since the PECO funds are tied to
educational programs.
Commissioner Bird explained that the reason the School Board
feels the county should be involved is that the Gifford community
is part of the unincorporated part of the county and they also
believe the uses will not be primarily educational, but community
type uses, i.e., recreation, cultural, social, civic, etc., which
lend themselves more to the responsibilities of the Board of
County Commissioners. It certainly is not the responsibility of
the Town of Indian River Shores to provide those services.
81 BOOK 66 P,a-UE 7.0U
DEC 16 1986
D E C 16
1986
BOOK
Commissioner Wheeler pointed
out that the School
Board
w.
already is participating in their schools with many community
activities, and he felt it is a better extension of the School
Board's function.
The Chairman and Commissioner Bird agreed but doubted you
could convince the School Board of this.
Commissioner Bird felt that Attorney Barkett needs some
direction in regard to starting work on some of the agreements.
He believed we certainly do not want to risk loosing $250,000
from the state.
Chairman Scurlock felt we need to be making the decision
whether or not we want to let them build this building and then
give it back to us. He personally did not want it back. It is
the School Board's PECO funds, and he did not see why we should
get another albatross back.
Commissioner Eggert concurred that she also would just as
soon not have the building back, but she did feel we have a
responsibility to the Gifford community.
Commissioner Bird believed the grant was a total surprise to
the School Board. The Progressive League feels they are capable
of operating and maintaining this building once it is completed,
and he did not believe they particularly care where the building
is leased from.
Discussion continued at length as who should own the
building once it is constructed, the reverter clause to the Town
of Indian River Shores, the possibility of the community center
generating some revenue, whether the county should be involved at
all, etc.
Attorney Vitunac advised the Board that it is perfectly
possible for the county to give a quit claim to the Town of
Indian River Shores and let the Town give the property to the
School Board with whatever conditions they want, and we would be
totally out of it.
82
M M M
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, to give a quit claim on the
property to the Town of Indian River Shores and let
the Town then give the property to the School Board.
Administrator Balczun did not see why we should have three
governmental jurisdictions involved, and Commissioner Eggert
stated that she could not vote for the Motion on the floor but
she did feel we could convey the property to the School Board.
Chairman -Scurlock stated he would vote for a Motion to con-
vey it to the School Board, and lengthy debate continued regard-
ing to whom the property should be conveyed, our responsibility,
operating expenses, a special taxing district, etc.
Commissioner Bird felt we are in the middle of this
situation because we have an obligation to the people of that
community to provide opportunities for cultural, social and
recreational activities, and he believed the educational
activities will be minor.
Commissioner Eggert pointed out that our Comprehensive Plan
defines this as a redevelopment area, and we need to do some
things that are unique to that community. She did feel we have a
definite responsibility and had no problem with the School Board
having the building and property but did not see why it should go
back to Indian River Shores and then to the School Board.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION on the Motion
to quit claim the property back to the Town of Indian
River Shores. It was voted on and defeated 3 to Z
with Commissioners Bird, Eggert and Scurlock voting
in opposition.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, to convey the property directly
to the School Board.
DEC 16 1986
83 B o o K 66 7?
D E C
BOOK
Commissioner Bird inquired if the proposed conveyance to the
School Board was with the understanding that they will convey it
.back to us to lease -to the League. "Commissioner Eggert stated that
her Motion was simply to convey the property to the School Board and
they would decide who they wished to negotiate with further."
Commissioner Bird asked if conveyance of the property to the
School Board would be by deed or lease, and Board members indi-
cated it would be by deed.
Attorney Barkett advised that the result would be that we
would
quit
claim
our title
to the School
Board
and they
then
would
have
title
subject to
the reverter
to the
Town of
Indian
River Shores in September of 1987.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
It was voted on and carried unanimously.
ADDED EMERGENCY ITEM - GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Planning Director Keating explained the emergency is that
the Grand Harbor people have indicated they need concurrence from
the Board to allow staff to issue the land development permit
prior to their closing on some loans. This is an unusual circum-
stance in that a land development permit per the ordinance is
simply a staff function , but when this Development Order was
approved, the Board said that they wanted to be informed prior to
staff issuing the permit.
Chairman Scurlock inquired if this necessitates a public
hearing, and Director- Keating noted that Grand Harbor was under
the impression that it would just require a simple statement from
staff advising the Board of the situation.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously added the
above emergency item to the agenda.
84
Chairman Scurlock asked if he understood the land develop-
ment permit is not ready to be issued, and Public Works Director
Davis advised that his staff has reviewed the application,
commented on it, and requested additional information. Grand
Harbor has responded and staff has reviewed their response and is
in the final stages of developing some conditions. They are not
100% ready.
Question arose as to whether this discussion should be
continued or whether this would have to be a regular agenda item
with complete backup. Director Keating commented that staff's
impression was that when they were ready, they would do a backup
agenda item and put it on the Consent Agenda. Grand Harbor was
under the impression that it.would simply require a verbal
report.
Staff Planner Stan Boling pointed out that the land
development portion they are looking'at is for the uplands area
and does not involve the estuarine system area.
Commissioner Bowman wished to know if the items that have to
be referred to the Regional Planning Council are concerned with
the uplands.
Staff confirmed that they are, and the Chairman wished to
know how Grand Harbor can close on a loan if they do not have all
these things complete.
Attorney Henderson came before the Board representing Grand
Harbor. He explained that while there are some items pending
with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Council is
moving their offices this week, and it has been almost impossible
to reach them. He believed the Planning Council has all the
information they need from Grand Harbor to sign off. Attorney
. Henderson explained that Grand Harbor is trying to time the
issuance of the permit with some pending loans on the project;
the loan closing actually started yesterday and was postponed
until today for this item and was being rescheduled for tomorrow.
The timing is tight.
85
s
BOOK.
DEC 16 IS66 BOOK 66F'A F 7?5
Chairman Scurlock asked if it can't be postponed further,
and Attorney Henderson felt it could but it would pose some
pretty severe problems for the developer. He stressed that it
was their impression that the Board simply had stated that they
would like to be informed when the permit was ready for issuance.
Chairman Scurlock believed that Director Davis has said that
everything is not ready, and Attorney Henderson believed Director
Davis is saying they would issue a permit with conditions.
Director Davis advised that (1) they do not have a sign -off
from Utilities yet, and (2) they don't have a signing and marking
plan for the roadways or a DOT permit. Staff feels they can
issue the permit prior to those items, but would like to have a
30 day timeframe established for their submittal. They also have
a minor question on some drainage calculations, but feel that can
be resolved. These are the type items that are involved.
Planner Boling explained that the items the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council wants to look at are the littoral zones
for the fresh water lakes and a maintenance plan agreement re the
estuarine system. We have a verbal comment from them but nothing
in writing.
Chairman Scurlock inquired what approving this today would
allow the developer to do, and Planner Boling stated that, as
regards work on the site, actually nothing because a land
clearing permit has to be issued after this; they would just be
allowed to close on their loan.
Chairman Scurlock inquired why the closing is contingent on
the land development permit, and Attorney Henderson explained
that most of these type loans require the issuance of building
permits; these are construction loans on two multi family
projects, and the loanor is requiring that the land development
permit,be issued.
Attorney Barkett clarified that the lendor is aware the
Board wanted to keep tabs on how the project is proceeding and
wants to make sure the Board is not going to stop it from pro-
ceeding. All Grand Harbor is asking for today is -simple
86
concurrence that the Board has been kept aware of how things are
proceeding.
Commissioner Eggert inquired if the permit can be issued
provided staff is satisfied with all the conditions, and this was
confirmed.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to issue the Land Development Permit to Grand
Harbor with conditions as outlined and with appro-
priate time limits to satisfy the conditions, i.e.,
thirty days.
Attorney Barkett advised that Grand Harbor also has sub-
mitted a plan for maintenance and an agreement which puts the
responsibility for complying withthe plan on Grand Harbor and,
on the Property Owners Association.
The Board indicated they needed time to review this and that
it could be included on next week's agenda.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made,
seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 11:25 o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
Clerk
87
DEC 16 1966
Chairman
BOOK