HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/20/1987Tuesday, October 20, 1987
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission
Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday,
October 20, 1987, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Don C.
Scurlock, Jr., Chairman; Margaret C. Bowman, Vice Chairman;
Richard N. Bird; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Gary C. Wheeler. Also
present were Charles P. Balczun, County Administrator; Charles P.
Vitunac, Attorney to the Board of County Comnissioners; Joseph
Baird, OMB Director; and Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
Bruce Havens of the United Church of Sebastian gave the
invocation, and Commissioner Bird led the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Commissioner Bird requested the addition to today's Agenda
of authorization to reestablish the City/County Bike Path
Committee.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously added
the above item to today's Agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any changes or additions to
the Minutes of the Special Meeting of September 29, 1987. There
were none.
LO CT 2 0.1987
800K 69 PAGE 111
OCT 2 O 1987 BOOK
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
69 PAcE 712 -7
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved
the Minutes of the Special Meeting of 9/29/87, as
written.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Bowman requested that Item A be removed for
discussion.
In addition, Commissioner Bird requested that Items G and H
be removed; Commissioner Wheeler requested that Item L be
removed; and Commissioner Eggert requested that Items O and P be
removed.
A. Commercial/Industrial Development Data Source Guide -
Economic Development Administration
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/29/87:
TO: The Honorable Members DATE: September 29, 1987 FILE:
of the Board of'County
Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
SUBJECT:
Robert M. eat ng, ICP
Community Dev dl n -E," ector
,r
..T FROM:
APPROVAL AND TRANSMITTAL
OF THE COMMERCIAL/INDUST-
RIAL DEVELOPMENT DATA
SOURCE GUIDE TO THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATION
G�
Cheri J. Boudreaux REFERENCES:
Staff Planner, -Long -Range Planning
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of October 20, 1987.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS =
The United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development--
Administration
evelopment-Administration (EDA), -awarded technical assistance funds to the - -
County through the Economic Development Council to develop a
Commercial and Industrial Development Data Source Guide. The
Final Report of .the .Data Source Guide is due to EDA by October
30, 1987.
The 'EDA approved a draft final report of the Data Source Guide,
on August 10, 1987, with -a few minor additions. The Economic
Development Council. unanimously approved the final report as
presented at their meeting of September 22, 1987.
2
1
The Commercial and Industrial Development Data Source Guide
provides a detailed data base for all of the commercially and
industrially designated areas in the County. Each of the
commercial and industrial areas are analyzed in detail, and
profiles of each area identifying zoning, land use, availability
of public utilities, amount of developed and undeveloped land,
access to regional transportation systems, permitted uses, site
suitability, and other potentials and constriants for development
are included.
The Data Source Guide is intended to assist local officials, the
planning staff, developers, real estate agents, and other
interested parties in directing prospective businesses and
industries to areas in the County which are most suitable for
them.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the Economic Development Council's approval, staff
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the
Commercial and Industrial Development Data Source Guide Final
Report and authorize staff to transmit the report to the Economic
Development Administration.
Commissioner Bowman pointed out that page 10 of the report
mistakenly refers to the "Pelican Island 'Federal Bird Sanctuary",
and requested that it be corrected to read "Pel.ican Island
National Wildlife Refuge." She pointed out that the same
paragraph states incorrectly that the Audubon Society is
responsible for maintaining the breeding ground in the Indian
River Lagoon near the Sebastian Inlet. She emphasized that the
Audubon Society has no jurisdiction there, and requested that it
be changed to show that the Refuge is under the jurisdiction of
the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (Titusville), which
is a branch of the U.S. Department of the Interior, United States
Fish & Wildlife Service.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
the Commercial and Industrial Development Data Source
Guide Final Report with the corrections as set out
above, and authorized staff to transmit the report to
the Economic Development Administration.
®UT a 1981 3 BOOK 69 DOD
BOOK 69 mcE 14
REPORT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
_ COMMISSIONERS
B. Occupational Licenses Report - Tax Collector's Office
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/9/87:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
P. O. Box 1509
GENE E. MORRIS, C.F.C. VERO BEACH. FLORIDA- 32961
'T'AX COLLECTOR TELe.NoNe, (305) 587-8180
Board of County Commissioners
Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector
October 9, 1987
SUBJECT: Occupational Licenses
Pursuant to Indian River County Ordinance No. 86-59, please
be informed that $109,450.88 was collected in occupational
license taxes during the month of September 1987, representing
the issuance of 4,318 licenses.
Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously accepted
the above report from Tax Collector Gene Morris.
4
C. Proclamation Honoring Charlie Blaney
P R O C L A M A T I O N
WHEREAS, CHARLIE BLANEY has been part of the Dodger's Minor
League operation for the past 20 years; and
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Dodgers today named CHARLIE BLANEY
as Director of Minor League Operations; and
WHEREAS, CHARLIE BLANEY has served the organization as a
Minor League General Manager for eight years; two years.at single
A; three years at double A; three years at triple A; and he has
served the Vero Beach minor league franchise the past 13 seasons;
and
WHEREAS, CHARLIE BLANEY started with the Dodgers in 1966 _
and was named Minor League General Manager of the Year by the
Sporting News in 1969 and Executive of the Year in the Pacific -
Coast League in 1972; and
WHEREAS, CHARLIE BLANEY has been the Managing Director of
Dodgertown - the world's largest and most complete sports
training complex since 1974; and
WHEREAS, in 1986/87 the United Way celebrated 25 years of
community services in Indian River County and CHARLIE BLANEY and
his wife DAWN were the 1986/87 United Way 25th Anniversary
Campaign Chairmen, and raised a record breaking $552,000;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board
expresses deep appreciation for the service CHARLIE BLANEY has
performed on behalf. of Indian River County.
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that our heartfelt wishes for his
success go with him.
October 9, 1987
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY J
Don C. Scur ock, Jr.
CHAIRMAN
5
BOOK. 69 PAGE 7,15
OOT 2 0 1987 BOOK :69 pg[ 7167
D. Proclamation_- Youth Manner Week
P R O C L A M A T I O N
WHEREAS, -Youth Manor is a community based group
home serving abused, neglected, and disturbed youths ages
10-17 years; and
WHEREAS, youths are referred to the program for a
variety of reasons including persistent behavior which would
be considered counterproductive to society; and
WHEREAS, Youth Manor
professional Family Teachers;
assistants; and
is staffed by highly trained
along with two full-time
WHEREAS, Youth Manor successfully trains critical
skills in academics, personal maintenance, family
relationships, and vocations to its students; and
WHEREAS, appropriate behavior such as that taught
at Youth Manor is critical for a successfully functioning
community;
NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF
COUray COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that
October 18th through October 24th, 1987 be designated as
Youth Manner week- and calls. upon all citizens, schools,
businesses, clubs and the news media to commemorate the role
of Youth Manor in our community.
DATED this 20th day of October, 1987.
BOARD OF COUNTY COiIMA I SS 1 ONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
D'on Scurlock, J .
Chairman
6
E. Acceptance of Warren Winchester's Resignation from District
IX Mental Health, Drug and Alcohol Abuse Advisory Council
The Board reviewed the following letter dated 9/8/87:
8 October 1987
Board of Commissioners, Indian River ��ty
1840 25th Street .
Vero Beach, Florida 32160
Subject: District Ik Mental Health, Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Advisory Council
Honorable Commissioners:
It is with regret that 3 must resign from the District %X
Advisory Council effective 31 December 1987. I find that the
press of other responsibilities precludes me from giving the
time and effort required to Positively impact on delivery of
care far these illnesses.
I have served on theCouncil si'h�e it was reformed in 1984, and
am pleased to say that we have made some tremendous improvements
during that time. The agreement under which the Indian River
Community Mental Health Center assumed the management of
Alcxzhope was a major acomplishment. Plans to increase the
capability at this facility are under way, as are plans to
improve service to others who depend on the delivery of HRS
carp*.
% would urge you to continually look at zoning ordinances and
their impact an such things as group homes, half way houses and
rehabilitation facilities. I would also urge You to support
legislation which would permit a portion of the fines and
seizures monies to be diverted away from law enforcement and
directed to education and rehabilitation of those who find
themselves victims af substance abuse. I believe monies derived
from tax on alcohol, for example, should be used to pay for some
of the human damage it can do.
In looking for a replacement, I urge You to appoint a lay person
who has not had a family member as a user of the HRS services. I
believe it is important for one to be able to work without
personal emotional invo1vment, but involvement as a volunteer in
local community issues would be a plus. .
Working with Commissioners Wodtke and Eggert has been very
rewarding. Continued involvement at the Commission level is
needed and necessary to ensure the needs of the community are
mer.
Again, my sincere thanks for the opportunity you have given me
to serve my community, and for your support in our work.
Sin erely,
4�Warren Winchester
5 Tarpon Drive
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
7 ` ������ ��r�� ��
t�r� 2 0�1�x�~� BOOK K���� K �
-7
OCT 2 0 1977 BOOK 69 PA,E
18
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously accepted
Warren Winchester's resignation from the District 1X
Mental Health Advisory Council.
F. Authorization for Chairman to Sign Emergency Management
Services Contract
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13/87:
TO: Board of County DATE: October 13, 1987 FILE:
Commissioners
THRU: Charles P. Balczun
County Administrator C4
Sharon B. Phillips SUBJECT: Agenda Item -
Assistant County Attorney Approval of EMS
County Award Contract
FROM: DougWright / REFERENCES:
Director, Emergency Management
BACKGROUND
The Indian River County Board' -of County Commissioners author-
ized the Chairman on August 18,' 1987, to sign the Application
for Funding - County EMS Award. HRS has approved and accepted
the application returning the attached contract for execution
in the amount of $41,349.55 to be used for purposes and agencies
identified in the original application. There is an increase
in the amount identified in the original application of $362.25
which was left over from FY 86-87. The contract represents
the amended application and correct sum.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the EMS County Award Contract and
requests the Chairman sign the two original copies of the Contract
as well as the letter authorizing advance funding as noted in
the cover letter.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
the EMS County Award Contract, and authorized the
Chairman's signature, as recommended in the above
memo.
COPY OF CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
8
G. _Bar Screen and Grinder Pump_for Lift Station - County Jail,
Phase I
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13187:
TO: Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
DATE; October 13, 1987
�c
SUBJECT: BAR SCREEN AND GRINDER PUMP
FOR PHASE I IFT STATION
THROUGH: H. T. Dean
Solid Was Man gement
FROM: Joseph A. Bai
' OMB Director
Exblanation
The lift station constructed to facilitate sewage flow from
Phase I of the County jail is experiencing significant
operational problems due to large quantities of grease being
generated. Phase II of the jail and the Sheriff's Administration
Building (scheduled to be completed in the near future), will
need to utilize this lift station, which will compound the
existing grease problem. Utility staff is recommending a bar
screen, grease trap and grinder pump be installed at a cost of
$12,701.00 plus installation to reduce the maintenance and
operational problems.
Funding
Initial installation and design of the lift station was
paid for by the Utilities Department. It is their feeling that
the cost to modify the lift station should be paid from Phase II
of the Jail. -
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize
the modifications of the lift station at a price not to exceed
$24,000 be transferred from Phase II contingencies (391-906-581-
099.91) to Construction.in Progress (391-906-523-066.51).
Commissioner Bird felt all of the Commissioners have been
frustrated from time to time regarding change orders for the new
Jail, but it seemed to him that this problem should have been
addressed during the design stage. He understood that Utilities
Director Pinto has indicated that the problem is not just grease
and that the grinder is needed for other things that are thrown
into the sewer.
,OCT 2 0 1g87 9 BOOK 69 FACFI,9
L
OCT 2 0 1987 BOOK 69 PACE 720
Chairman Scurlock noted that the screen also catches
contraband that is thrown into the system.
Director Pinto explained that the bar screen catches candy
wrappers, towels, socks, and other items that inmates throw into
the system hoping to clog it up.
Commissioner Bird felt that if the problem was grease, we
may need to get something else.
OMB Director Joe Baird emphasized that he wrote this request
for authorization of the modifications after receiving a memo
from the Utilities Dept.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized
the modifications of the lift station at a price not to
exceed $24,000; funds to be transferred from Phase 11
contingencies to Construction in Progress account.
H. Budget Amendment - Purchase of E911 Central Communication
Equipment
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13/87:
TO: Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
DATE: October 13, 1987
SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE
E911 CENTRAL COMMUNICATION
EQUIPMENT
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
Explanation
Emergency Management needs the attached equipment
to be included in the new E911 Central Communication Center to
continue operations in a worst-case situation. This would
provide a back-up location for the EOC and Executive Group to -
continue local government operations as well as provide some
necessary communications that is needed on routine non -emergency
day to -day operations. The installation and purchase at a cost
of $9,615.60 is much more feasible and less expensive at this
point rather than attempt to install it after the center is on
line. Sheriff Dobeck has given verbal approval for the addition
of the equipment.
10
Funding
It is requested that the funding come from the Sheriff
Administration Building Construction Fund contingency which has
a current balance of $200,865.00
Recommendation
Staff recommends the approval to purchase and installation
of this communications equipment listed.
Commissioner Bird questioned how we arrived at purchasing
all this equipment from this firm at these prices, because he
does not see any bid information included with today's backup
material.
Chairman Scurlock felt that evidently somebody made a
decision that this did not have to be sent out for bid.
OMB Director Joe Baird advised that this will go through the
normal bid process. It was put on the Agenda because it is in
addition to what was approved originally.
Commissioner Bird asked Director Baird if he was comfortable
with this price, and Director Baird advised that this is just a
quote and we will go out for bid on al of this.
Commissioner Bird noted that if this had not been taken off
the Consent Agenda this morning, it would have been approved as
is.
Chairman Scurlock asked if the Board wished to table this
for further information from Doug Wright, Director of Emergency
Management.
OCT 2 U 1987
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously tabled
this item in order to receive further information
from the Director of Emergency Management.
11
BOOK 1 69 PAGE 721
ICT 2 0 1987 BOOK 69 PA -UF i22:
I. Final Plat Approval - Tierra Linda Subdivision
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/8/87:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: October 8, 1987 FILE:
the.Board of County Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert t. ea inc, AICP SUBJECT:
Planning & Devel men,t:rDirector
THROUGH: Stan Boling'. All,
Chief, Current Development
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR
TIERRA LINDA SUBDIVISION
FROM: Robert E. Wiegers; ' EFERENCES: tierra linda
Staff Planner BWIEG
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of October 20, 1987.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Tierra Linda Subdivision is a 67 lot subdivision of a ±21.69 acre
parcel located on the south side of 8th Street just west of 27th_ _
Avenue. The subject property is zoned RS -6 (Single-family
Residential up to 6 units/acre) and has an LD -2 (Low Density
Residential) land use designation. The proposed building density
is ±3.09 units/acre.
At their regular meeting of March 25, 1987 the Planning and Zoning
Commission granted preliminary plat approval for the subdivision.
The owner, Ed Netto, is now requesting final plat approval and has
submitted:
1. a final plat in conformance with the approved prelimi-
nary plat;
2. a warranty maintenance agreement covering publically
dedicated improvements; and
3. a maintenance bond guaranteeing the warranty maintenance
agreement.
ANALYSIS:
All required improvements have been constructed, and have been
inspected and approved by the Public Works and Utilities
Department. The County Attorney's office has inspected and
approved the submitted warranty maintenance agreement and
maintenance bond for legal form and sufficiency. All requirements
for final plat approval have been satisfied.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval to Tierra Linda Subdivision and accept the
submitted warranty maintenance agreement and maintenance bond.
12
J
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously
granted final plat approval for Tierra Linda
Subdivision, and accepted the submitted warranty
maintenance agreement and maintenance bond, as
recommended by staff.
J.�Bud get Amendment,_ Supervisor of Elections
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10114/87:
ANN ROBINSON
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
1840 25TH STREET, SUITE N-109
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-3394
TELEPHONES: (305) 567-8187 or 567-8000
October 14, 1987
TO: DON C. SCURLOCK, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
h r3
FROM: ANN ROBINSON, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
RE: ITEM FOR BCC CONSENT AGENDA OF OCTOBER 20, 1987
We were notified in September of the correct increase in
elected officials' salaries. Please see attached copies.
I request that the elections budget be amended by taking
money from the contingency fund and allocating it the
proper accounts as follows:
001-700-519-011.11 Executive Salaries $2,352
001-700-519-012.11 Social Security 175
001-700-519-012.12 Retirement , 410
001-700-519-012.14 Workman's Comp 14
Thank you.
OCT 2 0.1987 13 BOOK 69 mur 723
BOOK 69 PAGE 724
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously
approved the above budget amendment, as requested
by the Supervisor of Elections.
K. Routine Release of County Utility Liens
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10(14187:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Charles -P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: October 14, 1987
RE: CONSENT RELEASE OFBCC
COUMEETING
UTILITYOLIENS
187
ROUTINE RE
This office has processed the following matters and requests
permission for the Chairman to execute the standard re ease -
forms:
(1) Partial Release of Lien - Map 41
State Road 60 Sewers/Release 1 ERU
Paid by REALCOR OF VERO BEACH
Lot 280 of COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH
(2) Partial Release of Lien - Map 22
State Road 60 Sewers/Releases 12 ERUs
Paid by VISTA PROPERTIES
Building 34 of VISTA PLANTATION
(3) Partial Release of Lien - Map B
State Road 60 Water/Releases 12 ERUs
Paid by VISTA PROPERTIES
Building 34 of VISTA PLANTATION
(4) Release of Assessment Lien
State Road 60 Water Project/1 ERU
Fast Food Enterprises
The back-up information
County Attorney's Office.
for the above is on file in the
14
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously
approved the Release of Assessment Liens as set
out in the above memo.
COPIES OF ASSESSMENT LIENS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
L. Award of Bid for Position Classification and Pay Plan Study
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/14/87:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FToJRIDA
MEMORANDUM
TO MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT : AYARD OF BID FOR POSITION CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLAN STUDY
DATE : OCTOBER14, 1987
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION
11
Bids were received and opened on Wednesday, September 30, 1987 at 2:00 P.M. in
response to our Request for Proposals to perform a Position Classification and
Pay Plan Study for all employees under the Board of County Cc muissioners as
Option I, and for all employees serving under other constitutional officers as
Option II.
Eleven bid proposals were sent out;. and proposals were received from the
following:
OPTION I OPTION II TOTAL
FIRM! LOCATION COST COST COST
RALPH ANDERSON & ASSOCIA'T'ES IAT 11M,- TX $40,700 $ 7,000
$47,700
CXUOK09EALEH PERSONNEL WHEATON, IL 16,352 11,898 28,250
MANAGEMENT SERVICE'S
HAY MANAGRvOiT CONSULTANTS A IANTA, GA 37,500 17,000 54,500
LONG ASSOCIATES FT. LAUDERDALE FL 12 560 10 500
I ► , 23,060
EAST LANSING, MI 23,730 17,855 41,585
MC LFAN, VA 34,900 7,604 42,504
TAMPA, FL
DALLAS, TX
FALLS CHURCIi, vA
• • ••«4 Da M D/A'0(•• • z r
•
15
40,500 2,400
42,900
23,120 7,880 38,000**
41,850 17,250 59,100
Boor 69 PAGE 725
BOCK 69 ?AGE726
FUNDING
Funding for this study
Wass provided by the Board in the Contingency Budget.
Staff recoamends that the firm of Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby be awarded
the contract to perform the Position Classification and Pay Plan Study for
Indian River County for an amount not to exceed $40,500. This recoammdation
is based on a review of all proposals submitted. Factors considered were cost,
experience and credentials of consultant staff, a general understanding of the
task to be accomplished, the technical approach to the study, their
availability and proximity to Indian River County, completeness and quality of
proposal, and their references.
Wm. A. ankenship, J ,
Director of Personnel
Commissioner Bird wished to have a further explanation of
how this firm was selected over the other companies.
Bill Blankenship, Director of Personnel, explained that
after receiving 9 proposals and talking with the consultants
involved, it was determined that this firm could best perform the
quality service desired. He noted that the firm of Towers,
Perrin, Forster 6 Crosby is nationally recognized, and in his
opinion, the other firms did not have as good a grasp. He
advised that he has previous experience with the two firms
offering lower prices, and had not been perfectly satisfied with
them. Director Blankenship explained that he and Administrator
Balczun reviewed all the proposals and are recommending that the
Board adopt Option I and Option II, if the constitutional
officers wish to participate. However, they have not done so
formally as yet.
Commissioner Bird wanted to know how the specifications were
written since we received such a wide variation in bidding.
Chairman Scurlock emphasized that he was quite concerned
yesterday over the wide variation in the proposals and checked
into the matter with Mr. Blankenship and Administrator Balczun.
He pointed out that with this firm there is not as great a spread
between Option I and If as with some of the other firms.
16
Commissioner Bird said he would go along with the
recommendation this time, but felt that in the future perhaps we
should go to the negotiation process rather than to open bidding.
Administrator Balczun reported that he has spoken to the
constitutional officers, and they have all indicated their
willingness to go with Option II. The reason the cost for Option
II is so low is because there are fewer job classifications in
the constitutional officers' departments.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved
staffs recommendation and awarded the contract for
Position Classification and Pay Plan Study to Towers,
Perrin, Forster & Crosby at a cost not to exceed
$42,900, which includes Option 11 for the
constitutional officers.
AGREEMENT IS FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
M. IRC Bid #362, Aluminum Blanks
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/9187:
TQ:r Honorable Board of County DATE: October 9, 1987 FILE:
Commissioners =
THROUGH: Michael L. Orr
Traffic Engineer
and
Joseph A. Baird, Dir.-
Office of Mgnt. & Bdgt.
FROM:
Leila Miller n
Budget ANALYSE'
RECOMMENDATION
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID 362 -
. ALUMINUM BLANKS
REFERENCES:
Thirty four different types of aluminum blanks were considered in
Bid 362. Municipal Supply came in as low bidder on thirty two of
these, with Vulcan Signs the low bidder on the remaining two.
The bid tabulation following this agenda item outlines the --
results. n
OCT 2 0 'wbf 17 BOOK 69 Pa,,F 727
z
BOOK 69 FACE 128 -
Although Vulcan Signs was low bidder on Items 5 and 10, Mr. Orr,
Traffic Engineer, recommends that the County use Municipal Supply
for all purchases -related to this bid. It is his feeling that
efficiency is better served by ordering all aluminum blanks from
one supplier. He believes that the amounts of Items 5 and 10
required by the County will be so minimal in the coming year that
the labor and processing costs involved in ordering these two
items from a separate buyer far outweighs the savings benefit of
the lower bid.
INTENDED USE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Aluminum blanks are used to secure traffic signs in place.
SOURCES OF FUNDS
- Funds were approved for 1987/88 in the Traffic Engineering Budget
BID DATA
Bid 362 was advertised July 31st, August 3rd, 10th and 17th,
1987. Bids were received Wednesday, -August 26, 1987 at 2:00 p.m.
Five bids were received of which two, Zap Manufacturing and
Florida Transcor, were 'no bids'.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #362 to Municipal Supply, as recommended by staff.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
BID TABULATION
BID NO. DATE OF OPENING
2
u
BID TITLE 7t1
ALI)MINUh1 BLANKS
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICI
NO. A
1. 30" 0 to d G J G 7
L� ! S Z I I
18
� � i
e on
(School) Each
N.
3611
Penta onL_
-(School) Each
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
2411
Pentagon
Route Marker)r-a.b ■■■a■■■■®M�
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
.
....
■■■gym■■■�r�■ir�®
18
� � i
e' -)ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
184025th Street
I DATE OF OPENING
362
Y
BID TITLE
Vero Beach. Florida 32960
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION
19_ 241L- V
Each
1
Each
.21._.24"_i 24"
._ Each
e? 24" x 30"
BID TABULATION
L
BID NO.DATE OF OPENING
362 Aum. 26 9
BID TITLE
" 7w
ALUMIA•UM BW -KS
RENDESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRIC
NO.
I
I
of 1 A/
a
0 36"
b
11. 1211 x 18" Each
S�
12 12" x 36" Each
+L/
y
,
13. 18" x 24" Each
14. 18" x 6" Each
1
3
15 18" x 18"
16. 21" x 15" Each
W
1
3 21
17. 24" x 1211 Each
d
0/
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach. Florida 32960
BID TABULATION
BID NO.
I DATE OF OPENING
362
Aux. 26, 1987
BID TITLE
a _ALUMINUM BLANKS
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION
19_ 241L- V
Each
20.
Each
.21._.24"_i 24"
._ Each
e? 24" x 30"
Each
v
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE I UNIT PRICE I UNIT PRI(
9
�0.19�7 ROOF 69 FacE 729
CT
26. 30" x 811 Each
27 3011 x 24" Each
9
�0.19�7 ROOF 69 FacE 729
CT
BOOK 69 PAGF 7,*30
N. IRC Bid #363 - Road Striping Paint
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/12/87:
TO: Honorable Board of DATE: October 12, 1987 FILE:
County Commissioners
THRU Joseph A. Baird, Director
Office of Mgmt. & Bd gt.
and
Michael L. Orr
Traffic Engineer
FROM: Leila Miller
Budget Analyst
RECOMMENDATIONS
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID 363 -
ROAD STRIPING PAINT
REFERENCES:
Bid proposals on five different types of paint were considered.in —_
Bid 363. Another item considered was the number of days it would
take to deliver these paints. In all cases Roadway Supply bid in_
at prices slightly lower than current prices, and their delivery
time was the shortest as well, at 3-7 days. Evaluation of the
bid tabulation form which follows this agenda item indicates the
results of Bid 363. Staff recommends that Roadway Supply be
awarded the contract for road striping paint.
20
INTENDED USE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Road striping paint is used to paint safety markings on the road.
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Monies have been approved and provided for in the 1987-88 traffic
engineering budget.
BID DATA
IRC Bid #363 was advertised July 31st, August 3rd, 10th and 17th,.
1987. Bids were received Wednesday, August 26, 1987 at 2:00 p.m.
Four bids were received.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #363 to Roadway Supply, as recommended by staff.
OCT 2 0 193,87 21 BOOK 169 PAGE. 1 X31
BOOK 69 Fr,UE 7732:
0. Bid 4364 - Traffic Sign Hardware
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/12/87:
TO: Honorable Board of DATE: October 12, 1987
County Commissioners
THRU: Joseph A. Baird, Dir.
Office of Mgmt. & Bd9t.
e
and
Michael L. Orr
Traffic Engineer ^1�
FROM: Leila Miller
Budget Analys 4!21-
RECOMMENDATION
t.
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID 364 -
TRAFFIC SIGN
HARDWARE
Eleven items were considered separately in the bid proposal for
traffic sign hardware. Staff makes the following
recommendations:
7 Post, Round
tube, Rejected
OD Alum. 12/ft
8 Post, Round "
tube, OD alum.
16 ft.
9 Sign Bracket
Type I Mncpl. Supp.
10 Span Wire -
Mount sign
Panel Rejected
22
If Rejected
Amount Then Why
3.75 ea. - -
10.56 ea. -
9.33 ea -
2.95
ea. -
Company
Item
# Description
Recommended
1
Posts, Delineator
Univ. Signs
2a
Posts -Rib -Bak-
Univ. Signs
per 100
2b
Posts -Rib -Bak-
Mncpl.Supp .
per 500
3
Street Sign Brackets:
45° Sign to Sign
Mncpl. Supp.
900 Sign to Sign
Mncpl. Supp.
900 -Post to Sign
Mncpl. Supp.
1800 Post to Sign
Mncpl. Supp.
4
Posts, Round Tube
Mncpl. Supp.
5
Sign Brackets
Mncpl. Supp.
6
Alum. Channel
100 if
Rejected
7 Post, Round
tube, Rejected
OD Alum. 12/ft
8 Post, Round "
tube, OD alum.
16 ft.
9 Sign Bracket
Type I Mncpl. Supp.
10 Span Wire -
Mount sign
Panel Rejected
22
If Rejected
Amount Then Why
3.75 ea. - -
10.56 ea. -
9.33 ea -
2.95
ea. -
2.75
ea -
2.65
ea. -
2.65
ea. -
53.00
ea -
5.15
ea. -
7.25 ea.
The only vendor that
bid was Univ. Signs.
Staff feels the
price is too high
compared with cur-
rent prices. We
can call for ver-
bal quotes from
other vendors now
used.
Although the County
received two bids,
staff feels that the
prices quoted were
too high compared
with current prices.
We can call for
verbal quotes from
other vendors now
used.
Staff feels that
price bid was too
high compared w/
current prices.
I
It should be noted that Item 3 - street name sign brackets -
act.ually has a lower bidder than Municipal Supply - Vulcan Signs.
Mr. Orr, Traffic Engineer, asserts that for the sake of cost
effectiveness, his department generally tries to group an
individual bid where a small amount of goods are involved,
between one or two vendors. Vulcan Signs did not bid on every
aspect of this proposal. Municipal Supply was generally lower on
almost every portion ;of the bid, except for Items 1 and 2a.
Traffic Engineering staff recommends that Municipal Sign be
awarded the bid for I_t.em 3. .lttf
INTENDED USE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
The equipment will be used by the Traffic Engineering.Department
in the construction of traffic signs.
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Funds were approved for 1987-88 in the Traffic Engineering
Budget.
BID DATA
Bid 364 was advertised on July 31st, August 3rd, 10th and 17th, _ =
1987. Bids were received Wednesday, August 26, 1987 at 2:00 p.m.
Five bids were received of which two were 'no bids.'
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #364 to the companies as set out in the above
memo,,as recommended by staff.
• ovr�nu yr �.vury � i vvrvuvu.�aw�cn.�
1840 251E Street ('
Vero Beach, Florida 32960 ' \
BID TABULATION '•
BID NO. DATE OF OPENING
IRC B I D #364Aug. 26, 1987 �\
BID TITLE �` V
HARDWARE - TRAFFIC SIGNS
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE
UNIT
1. Posts. Delineator. lift Gal
1,12/lbs
1 2. Posts Rib-bak. 12/ft Galy. 2.Olb
'
ft. a. Per 100
Oja 4.7
Q
-b-P---r- WHO
6
3. Street Name Sian Brackets, Alum.
1UF Su r-lok or equivalent
° - o i n bracket Each
�'j� 0 "b
900 SIgn-tQ=sj9n bracket Each
a•1 S o2 D 1
f
00 Post -to -sign bracket_ Each
a 6S 6
—
1800 Post -to -sign bracket Each
>Posts, Round Tube 4"O.D. Alum.
12/ft .156 wall thickness
L: as per FDOT Specs. Each
LJ
eooK 69 PA,E 7:33
OCT0,
.1987
BOARD OF COUNTY: COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
BID TABULATION
BID NO. DATE OF OPENING
IRC BID X364 Au 26 1 q87
BID THE
HARDWARE -TRAFFIC SINGS
ITEM
NO, DESCRIPTION
CONT'D
I
BOOK 69 FA"f 7:34
v
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNI
.6
.i'
�6- Aluminum Channel, 1.5"
x X.
IDOL c
IO.J. Aluminum 12/ft EAC
I
I
8. Post, Round Tube, 4.5"
O.D. Aluminum 16 ft EACH
9. Sin Bracket, Type 11 for
• 4.5" O.D. Round Post. EACH
I
10. Span Wire Mount Sign Panel
Assembly, Type B PA
FF11 ral MEN ME
I i
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
• 1840 25th Street !
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
BID TABULATION C `�
�r
BID NO. DATE OF OPENING y
IRC BID #364 Aug. 26 1 8
BID TITLE v
HARDWARE -TRAFFIC SIGNS V ��
ITEM '
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE
I1. N
after receipt of Purchase Order
24
P. IRC Bid #366 - Golf Course Liquid Fertilizer
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10113187:
TO: Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
DATE: October 13, 1987
SUBJECT: IRC BID # 366 - GOLF COURSE
LIQUID FERTILIZER
THROUGH: Bob Komarinetz Joseph A. Baird
Director of Golf OMB Director
FROM: Leila Miller
Budget Analyst
Recommendation
C.
Golf Course personnelreviewed all effers submitted for IRC
Bid # 366 - Golf Course Liquid Fertilizer. Upon reading these bids -
their staff feels that it would be in the best interest of the County
to purchase these items on an as -needed basis, rather than on an -
annual bid.
Intended Use of Capital Equipment
Liquid fertilizer is used to improve the general health and
appearance of the grass at the Golf Course.
Source of Funds
Funds for the purchase of liquid fertilizer are approved in the
1987/88 budget.
Bid Data
IRC Bid # 366 - Liquid Fertilizer was advertised July 31, August
3, 10 and 17, 1987. Bids were opened Wednesday, August 26, 1987 at
2:00 p.m. Six (6) bids were received of which three (3) were "no bids".
Commissioner Eggert questioned buying liquid or dry
fertilizer on an as- needed basis because of the tremendous
difference in price when you buy fertilizer in quantity. She
asked if we have an annual maintenance plan for the golf course.
Chairman Scurlock felt that fertilizer should have been
included in the total operating cost at budget time.
Commissioner Bird explained that the superintendent has to
sit down
at the first of the year and
decide how much
fertilizer
OCT 2 0
L
. 1987
25
800K
69 FAU-735
Boa 69 FAcE 7:36
CT 2 0 1997
we will need; however, it is very difficult to anticipate weather
and disease conditions to determine a year in advance exactly
what kind of chemicals or mix of fertilizer that will be needed.
This was discussed yesterday, and he expected this item to be
pulled from the Agenda this morning and done differently. OMB
Director Joe Baird feels that since staff has to fill out a
prescribed form and get a specified number of prices, they could
do better price wise to shop at the time of need rather than
trying to anticipate a year in advance.
Director Baird advised that he has received extensive work
papers from Bob Komarinetz on this matter and his recommendation
is that there be no annual bid on this item, and that in the
future just large purchases should be brought to the Board.
Commissioner Eggert did not want us to get caught in a
situation of buying small quantities from time to time, and noted
that this also included the dry fertilizer and chemicals in Item
Q.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously rejected
all bids, and authorized staff to bid this item on an
as -needed basis with any item over $2500 to be approved
by the Board.
Q. IRC Bid #367 - Golf Course Dry Fertilizer and Chemicals
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13/87:
26
TO: Members of the
Board of County Commissioners
DATE: October 13, 1987
SUBJECT: IRC BID # 367 - GOLF COURSE
DRY FERTILIZER AND CHEMICALS
THROUGH: Bob Komarinetz Joseph A. Baird
Director of Golf OMB Director
FROM: Leila Miller
Budget Analys
Recommendation
Golf Course personnel reviewed all gkiirs submitted for IRC
Bid # 367 - Golf Course Dry Fertilizer and Chemicals. Upon reading
these bids their staff feels that it would be in the best interest of
the County to purchase these items on an as -needed basis, rather than ---
on an annual bid.
Intended Use of Capital Equipment
Dry fertilizer and chemicals are used to enhance the general
health and appearance of the grass at the Golf Course.
Source of Funds
Funds for the purchase of dry fertilizer and chemicals are
approved in the 1987/88 budget.
Bid Data
IRC Bid # 367 - Dry Fertilizer and Chemicals was advertised July
31, August 3, 10 and 17, 1987. Bids were opened Wednesday, August 26,
1987 at 2:00 p.m. Eight (8) bids were received of which two (2) were
"no bids".
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously rejected
all bids, and authorized staff to bid this item on an
as -needed basis, with any purchases over $2500 to be
brought before the Board.
R. IRC Bid #370 -Alkyd Thermoplastic Material
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/12/87:
�+�CT
27
2 ® .1967 BOOK 69 FA,,f'i37
OCT 2 o tss7
BooK 69 FAUE 7 38
TO: Honorable Board of DATE: October 12, 1987 FILE:
County Commissioners
THRU: Joseph A. Baird, Dir.
Office of Mgmt & Budget
and '
Michael L. Orr 4
Traffic Engineer
Leila Miller
FROM: Budget Analyst
SUBJECT: IRC BID 370 -
ALKYD THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL
REFERENCES:
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Pavemark Corp., as low bidder, be awarded
the contract. Evaluation of the Bid Tabulation Form, which
follows this agenda item, clearly indicates the results of the
bid.
INTENDED -USE OF THE EQUIPMENT
Alkyd Thermoplastic Material is a plastic used for pavement
markings.
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Monies have been approved and provided for in the 1987/88 traffic
engineering budget. -
BID DATA
IRC Bid 370 was advertised July 31st, August 3rd, 10th and 17th,
1987. Bids were received Wednesday, August 26, 1987 at 2:00 p.m.
Four bids were received of which one, Flexo-Lite was a 'no bid'.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #370 to the low bidder, Pavemark Corporation, as
recommended by staff.
28
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
1840 25th Street
y
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
ly
BID TABULATIONSJ
yr
�O J'
BID NO. DATE OF OPENING
IRC BID ®370 Aug. 26, 1987.
\p
�� W^
BIDALTLE
KYO THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION
NO.
UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE .UNIT PRICE UNIT
1. White Alkyd (blocks) Per Pound
6
A
2. felj�• �s� Yu isrlueli
1IL71_
3. White Alkyd (granular)Per Pound
6
.4. Yellow Alkyd ranular Per Pound
.
3at u x*'
S. IRC Bid #373 - Dual Personnel Powered Lift - Phase I and II
of the Jail
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13/87:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: October 13, 1987
SUBJECT: BID NUMBER 373 -
DUAL PERSONNEL POWERED LIFT
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
Description and Condition
The "Dual Personnel Powered Lift" bids were opened*on Wednesday,
September 16, 1987 at 2:00 p.m. Proposals were as follows:
Vendor Model Price
Saf-T-Green of Orlando, Inc..._ Genie DPL 18 $ 5,625.00
Alternative
Johnny Stamm Equipment
Alternative
South Florida Engineers
Pringle Equipment Company
Funding
Genie DPL 24
Plant -Master 015VMWP
Plant Master 019BMEP
$ 6,255.00 -
$ 5, 744.66*_
$ 6,220.88 •_
No Bid
No Bid
At budget hearings the Board of County Commissioners authorized
the purchase of a "Dual Personnel Powered Lift" so staff could perform
routine maintenance at Phase I and II of the Jail. It was recommended
this be funded from Phase II of the Jail (391-906-523-066.41
Furniture and Equipment).
Recommendation
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners award the
"Dual Personnel Powered Lift" to the lower bidder Saf-T-Green of
Orlando, Inc. in the amount of $5,625.00 for model Genie DPL 18.
OCT 0 . `981
2 9 ROOK 69 PnE 739
BOOK 69 pnu 740
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #373 to the low bidder, Saf-T-Green of Orlando,
Inc., in the amount of $5,625 for for a dual personnel
powered lift for maintenance on Phases I and 11 of the
Jail, as recommended by staff.
T. Kings Highway & Route 60 Widening Project, Final Pay Request
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13/87:
To. HONORABLE MEMBERS OF DATE: October 13, 1987 FELE;
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THROUGH: _
Charles P. Balczun
County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E. v
Public Works Directo0-00-01
r ►►►✓✓✓
FROM:
Ralph N. Brescia, P.E.
County Engineer
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
SUBJECT: Rings Highway & Route 60
Widening Project
Final Pay Request
REFERENCES:
The intersection of Rings Highway and State Route 60 has recently
been reconstructed in terms of widening, signalization, pavement
markings, channelization signing, and drainage. _
This project has been monitored and inspected during construction
and has been final inspected and accepted by staff.
The original cost of the project plus the Board approved change
orders totaled $395,332.80. The final cost of the project based upon
the actual material placed totaled $444,429.32, a difference of
$51,971.52.
The difference in cost is based upon several factors:
1. The original quantity take off of certain items as performed by
the consulting enginering .firm was incorrectly determined from
the specification drawings.
2. Sub surface field conditions required the removal of large
quantities of unstable and undesirable material on almost the
entire length of the project. This resulted in a significant
difference in subbase -and base material.
30
3. The extention of the project north to accommodate the requests
of the Rivera Estates development.
4. The construction of a left turn storage lane to accommodate the
Florida National Bank on the west side of Kings Highway.
RECOMMENDATION & FUNDING
Based upon extensive research by staff including use of the
surveyors to verify field measurement accuracy and quantity take offs by
the engineering staff, it is recommended that the final pay request by
Dickerson Florida, Inc. in the amount of $139,932.72 be accepted and
paid at this time.
The funding for these monies is available
#109-142-541.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
from account
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized
final payment to Dickerson Florida, Inc. in the amount
of $139,932.72 for the Kings Highway & Route 60
Widening Project, as recommended by staff.
U. Change_Order #2 & Final Payment - Ixora Park Potable
Water Main
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/12/87:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1987
THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SIRVICES _
FROM: JEFFREY K. BARTON
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER #2 & FINAL PAYMENT
IXORA PARK POTABLE WATER MAIN
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -86 -15 -DS
BACKGROUND
Indian River County Project #UW -86 -15 -DS - Ixora Park Potable Water
Main - was designed and bid, with Coastline Utilities Inc. being the
low bidder, at an original contract price of $83,243.20; change order
#1 plus $16,222.50, for a total adjusted price of ($99,465.70).
Upon completion of the project, when quantity extensions are reviewed
as to materials used on the project, a change order is necessary to
adjust the contract price.
Attached is Change Order #2 for a decrease in the contract price of
$7,163.14.
The new adjusted contract price is $92,302.56.
31 ?UOK 6 PA�E-741
OCT, 0.197
IF OCT 2 0 1987
BOOK 69 Fr1UF 742
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends to the Board of County Commissioners the following:
1. Authorize Chairman to sign Change Order #2.
2. Authorize staff to pay final payment request.
3. Authorize staff to release retainage upon the completion of
the punch list items and upon the receipt of a one year
maintenance bond.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order #2; authorized final payment to Coastline
Utilities, Inc.; and authorized staff to release
retainage upon completion of punch list items and
receipt of a one-year maintenance bond, as recommended
by staff.
32
OCT 5.1987
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
Page 1 of 1
CHANGE ORDER N0. 2 PREVIOUS CONTRACT PRICE 99.465.70
DATE: REVISED CONTRACT PRICE 92-jo2_g6
JOB NAME Indian River County Project Nn_ ttwR6_��_nc
Potable Water Main Ixora Park
OWNER:_ Indian River County
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
PRICE
PREVIOUS
UNITS
PREVIOUS
TOTAL
PRICE
UNIT
CHANGE
PRICE
CHANGE
REVISED
TOTAL
PRICE
1
Mobilization
3,000.00
1
3,000.00
--
--
3,000.00
2
8" Dia. WM
15.62
3925
61,308.50
(-391)
(-6,107.42
55,201.08
3
6" Dia. WM
10.04
230
2,309.20
(-18)
(-180.72
2,128.48
4
8" Dia. Gate Valves
465.00
6 Uniti
2,790.00
--
--
2,790.00
5
6" Dia. Gate Valves
335.00
6 Uniti
2,010.00
-•--
--
2,010.00
6
Fire Hydrants
1,261.00
4 Uniti
5,044.00
--
--
5,044.00
7
8 X 8 Wet Tap w/
Tapping Valve
1,385.00
1
1,385.00
--
--
1,385.00
8
PVD. RD. Restoration
18.00
80
1,440.00
(-9)
(-162.00
1,278.00
9
PVD. DR. Restoration
16.00
190
3,040.00
(-31)
(-496.00
2,544.00
10
Seed & Mulch
1.00
3885
3,885.00
(-369)
(-369.00
3,516.00
it
1" Dia."Short"
Service W/Meter Bog
187.00
18
3,366.00
(-8)'
(-1,496.00
1,870.00
12
2" Dia."Short
Service W/2 Meter Bo
es412.00
24
9,888.00
+4
+1,648.00
11,536.00
TOTAL
99,465.70
1(-7,163-14
92,302.56
. WED FOR ` ,y �� l �'s't PERS
Justification:
Change Order Reflects Unit Adjustments to As -Built Quantities.
Amount of the Contract will be (Decreased).(%=ownsft) by the sum of:
Seven Thousand One Hundred Sixty Three and 14/100 W.161.14)
The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders will be:
Ninty Two Thousand Three Hundred Two and 56/100 ($92.302.56)
The Contract Period provided for completion will be ( XTI ) (888IEH989) (=changed):
days.
This document will become a supplement to the Contract and all provisions will apply hereto.
Contractor:
Engineer:
Owner:
L_ 1 0 0T 42 0198 1
Date:
- 2 f/-4'
Date: �� ( all
Date: /Q OR 0 — F 7
33 nor 69 F,1113743
rr-
-7
OOT 2 0 1987 BOOK 69 FAcci44
V. Resolution Requesting Names &_Addresses of Taxpayers Within
the Local Option Tourist Development Taxing Districts in Indian
River County
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10112/87:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Joe Baird, Director
DATE: October 12, 1987
SUBJECT: Resolution - Requesting h aures & addresses of
taxpayers within the Local Option Tourist
Development district.
FROM: Bruce Barkett,Assistant County Attorney.
The County Attorney's Office has been asked by the
Director of Management and Budget to adopt a resolution
requesting the names and addresses of taxpayers within the
Local Option Tourist Development Tax subcounty taxing
districts. The information is requested from the Department
of Revenue to accurately monitor collection of the Tourist
Development Tax by the Department of Revenue and
distribution and allocation by the Department of Revenue to
the county. By letter dated August 17, 1987 (attached) the
Department of Revenue notified the County Administrator that
a resolution like the one attached is required to obtain the
names and addresses of the taxpayers.
It is recommended that the Board adopt the attached'
resolution requesting the names and addresses of the
taxpayers within the taxing boundaries of the subcounty
districts and authorizing the Chairman to delegate to staff
the responsibility of forwarding this resolution to the
Department of Revenue with a request for the information
required.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 87-127, requesting the Department of
Revenue to provide the names and addresses of taxpayers
within the taxing boundaries of the Local Option
Tourist Development Tax subcounty taxing districts
within Indian River County.
34
RESOLUTION NO. 87- 127
WHEREAS, on January 27, 1987 the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County adopted Ordinance No.
87-11 establishing a Local Option Tourist Development Tax in
Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance levying the Tourist Development
Tax creates within Indian River County two subcounty taxing
districts; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Revenue is now authorized to
disclose to the governing body of the county or subcounty
district levying the Tourist Development Tax the names and
addresses of taxpayers within the taxing boundaries of such
county or subcounty district; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County- desires to have all
relevant information concerning the Tourist Development Tax
including the names and addresses of the taxpayers within
the subcounty taxing districts;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The foregoing recitals are fully incorporated as if
repeated herein.
2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County requests the Department of Revenue to provide to the
Board of County Commissioners the names and addresses of
taxpayers within the taxing boundaries of the Local Option
Tourist Development Tax subcounty taxing districts within
Indian River County.
3. Upon adoption of this Resolution the Chairman of
the Board of County Commissioners is authorized to delegate
to staff the authority to send this resolution to the
Department of Revenue to obtain the information requested
herein.
UT U 48 3 5 f1joK 69 PAGE 145
FF
OCT 2 ® 1987 BOOK 69 Fa,UE 746
The foregoing resolution
Commissioner Eggert and seconded
Wheeler and, being put to a vote,
follows:
was offered by
by Commissioner
the vote was as
.Chairman lion C. Scurlock, Jr.
Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman
Commissioner Richard N. Bird
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler
The Chairman thereupon declared the
duly passed and adopted this 20th day of
1987.
Aye
-! e
7XV —e
resolution
October
f
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY ITS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
By /
Don C. Scurlock, Jr., irman
PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY BAPTIST'S REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL
SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL OF A_CHURCH
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Dally
Vero Reach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach In Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a 1 •Lys_
in the matter
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper In the issues of atz
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero. Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun•
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscri of met ' day of, 19z—
(Bus'• as M ger
(SEAL) (Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River Count , Florida)
36
-' NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING
Notice of Public special moon apprwai to CMWW dna i
ranH� for s i
place of worship. The suWect propertY Is locatedat .
The SRoseland Road -
property Is described as: .
PARCEL 39. SECTION 22. TOWNSHIP
RANGE 37.38. and 19
EAST, FLEMIHO GRANT AS PER PLAT
BOOR 1. PAGE 175, PUBLIC RECORDS
OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, NOW LYING M
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA
A pubic hearing at which Parties in b
and citizens shall have an opportunity to M
heard, will be held by the Board of County pan'
m198torians of Indian Riva County. Flor
binlrlU•
Ocrrnmiasion Chambers o1 the Cdanp'
Vero °Beach, pj iiZ on Tuadaay. October 211.
199� m•Anyone aY wish to apps am/ decision
which may be made atthis meeting wf0 need to '
onswe made at a utiimMesr theolt�maay
deice upon which the appeal will be weed. i
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMOSSIONERS
Bya-Don ScinkrA Jr.
Chaaman
deptember 30.1987
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/8/87:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: October 8, '1987 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert a ing ICP SUBJECT: COMMUNITY BAPTIST'S
Community Develop ent,Director REQUEST FOR CONCEPTUAL
SPECIAL EXCEPTION
THROUGH: Stan Boling APPROVAL OF A CHURCH
Chief, Current Development
FROM: John W. McCo 1IY fA REFERENCES:
y community baptist
Staff Planner JOHN2
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of October 20, 1987.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Community Baptist has submitted an application for conceptual ---
special exception approval. Due to the fact that the property is
zoned RS -3, single family zoning district, the church is con-
sidered a special exception use, and must go through the special
exception process. -The applicant is seeking conceptual special
exception approval. If the Board of County Commissioners grants
the conceptual special exception approval, the applicant will need
to come back in with a major site plan application, meeting the
criteria of Section 23. The major site plan application will need
to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The pro-
perty is located at 12530 Roseland Road, approximately 11 miles
southwest of U.S. Highway #1 on the -east side of Roseland Road.
Special exception uses are those types of uses that would not
generally be appropriate throughout a particular zoning district.
However, when special exception. uses are carefully controlled as
to number, area, location, and/or relationship to the vicinity,
such uses would not adversely impact the public health, safety,
comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, and general welfare
and, as such, would be compatible with permitted uses within the
particular zoning district. Special exceptions require submittal'
of an approvable site plan meeting all site plan criteria,
(conceptual plans may be submitted) zoning district criteria and
the criteria set forth in the regulations for the specific use.
Pursuant to Section 25.3 of the Zoning Code, Regulation of Special
Exception Uses, the Board of County Commissioners is to consider
the appropriateness of the requested use based on the submitted
conceptual site plan and the suitability of the site for that use.
The Board may attach any conditions and safeguards necessary to
assure compatibility of the use with the surrounding area. The
Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approvalof
the project at their September 10, 1987 meeting (see attachment
#4) .
ANALYSIS:
The conceptual site plan meets all of the criteria of the site
plan ordinance [Section 23] and regulations for specific land uses
[Section 25.11 which are applicable to conceptual site plans for
_p_Lages of worship. The site plan proposes the development of the
37
)OCT 2 � 637 Boar 69 iacE 147
OCT 20 MQ7 eou 69 PAGE 748
southern half of the total site, the remaining area to be used for
future expansion of the use.
1. Total parcel size: 4.69 acres or 204,600 sq. ft.
2. Zoning Classification: RS -3, Single Family Residential, up
to 3 units/acre.
3. Land Use Designation: LD -1, Low Density Residential, up to 3
units/acre.
4. Building Area: 3,960 sq. ft.
5. -,Off-Street Parking Required: 40 spaces
Proposed: 40 spaces
(To be depicted on the major site plan application)
6. Traffic Circulat�.on: The site will use a 24' two-way paved
drive for access to Roseland Road.
7. Surrounding Land Use/Zoning:
North: Vacant/RS-3
South: Residence/RS-3
West: Vacant/RS-1
East: Vacant/Sebastian City Limits
8, Special Exception Criteria: The applicant has stated in
writing in a manner approved by the County Attorney, that all
site plan and special exception criteria will be met. -
The special exception criteria are as follows: _
1. No building .or structure shall be located closer than
thirty (30) feet to any property line abutting a
residential use or district.
2. Access shall be from a major thoroughfare or as
otherwise approved by the county engineer.
3. Any accessory residential use or school upon the
premises shall provide such additional lot area as
required for such use by this section and shall further
be subject to all conditions set forth by the reviewing
body. Accessory residential uses may include convents,
monasteries, rectories or parsonages.
4. - Type "B" screening, as defined in Section 23.3(g)(7)
shall be provided along all property boundaries when the
facility is located within or adjacent to a residential
district.
The application satisfies all applicable requirements for
conceptual special exception approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners grant conceptual special exception approval
for a place of worship with the following condition:
1. Ten feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Roseland
road, prior to release of the major site plan.
38
Chairman Scurlock opened the Public Hearing and asked if
anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he
declared the Public Meeting closed.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously granted
conceptual special exception approval to Community
Baptist for a place of worship with the condition
that 10 feet of right-of-way will be dedicated for
Roseland Road prior to release of the major site plan,
as recommended by staff.
PUBLIC HEARING - TOMAS VARA'S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION
APPROVAL FOR A GUEST COTTAGE
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having -passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach. Indian River County. Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
in the matter of
in the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. �J
Sworn to and subscribed beforD me this _ day of Qro19 d
/ loess na r
(Clerk of the Circuit Court, Indian River CoLJA, Florida)
(SEAL)
Notice of Pu icHOW" to mar the
for a
gIueet cortege.mimg The subject pr�bspecial; 0=90- �beated at
880 Reef Road -as
The subtest AND D 3 OFF .
LOTS 2 ANTHE Ot'EANSIDE
AND OCEANSI DE REPLAT SUBDIVI
910N. AS RELOADED IN PLAT BOOK
10, PAGE 20 OF NO" RIVER
E INDIAN CO, FLORIDA. RIVER
A public hearing, at whi0 perdas in httaeee
=ai0xene eha0 haw an opof Cou t to be
heard. w10 b f heW n iM Board of Flou^q Com'
missfonere ef Indian River County, Florida 0100
Commledat Chambers of Me Counb AdS`_�.
g�uEinp located at 1810
Y Beaeh, FTaida. on TuuWdaY. October 20.
199 i
7A�� 5. a mwish to sppsel my daWbn
tmau�Mgt W�madelef Mie record Uof 00 WOCIOUISS
Ie ewichhWdes "MwrrYl0 need to
pend upon which the aPPwI be bmd.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
By-mDon S K. Jr. `
September 30. 11987
OCT 2 0 1981 39 BOOK 69 FA,F f 49
OCT 2 0
1987
BOOK 69
FACE 750
The Board
reviewed the following memo dated 10/8/87:
TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: October 8, 1987 FILE:
the Board of County Commissioners -
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert M. X ng, ICP SUBJECT:
Planning & Develo ent Director
L
THROUGH: Stan Boling!:4
Chief, Current Development
TOMAS VARA'S REQUEST FOR
SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPROVAL
FOR A GUEST COTTAGE
FROM: John W. McCo r/ REFERENCES: vara
Staff PlanneJOHN2
It is requested that the data herein. presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their
regular meeting of October 20, 1987.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND LOCATION:
Tomas Vara has submitted a request to receive special exception
approval to authorize the construction of a guest cottage within-
the RS -3 zoning district, located at 590 Reef Road. The special -- - _
exception request was accompanied by a request for minor site plan
approval which was granted by the Technical Review Committer at
its August 19, 1987 meeting, contingent upon approval of the
special exception use by the Board of County Commissioners.
Special exception uses are those types of uses that would not
generally be appropriate throughout a particular zoning district.
However, when special -exception uses are carefully controlled as
to number, area, location, and/or relationship to the vicinity,
such uses would not adversely impact the public health, safety,
comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, and general welfare
and as such would be compatible with permitted uses within the
particular zoning district. Special exceptions require submittal
of an approvable site plan meeting all site plan criteria, zoning
district criteria, and the criteria set forth in the regulations
for the specific use. The Planning and Zoning Commission unani-
mously recommended approval of this project at their September 10,
1987 meeting (see attachment #4)
ANALYSIS:
1. Lot Size: Lot 2: 36,000 sq. ft.
Lot 3: 36,000 sq. ft.
These lots are joined together with a unity of title.
2. Zoning Classification: RS -3, Residential Single Family (3
units/acre).
3. Land Use Designation: LD -1, Low Density Residential (3
units/acre).
4. Building Area: Main House 5,900 sq. ft.
Guest Cottage - 2,775 sq. ft.
5. Traffic Circulation: The site will utilize one driveway
which accesses the main house from Reef Road.
—6_t_T_ Utilities :
The site will utilize City water and wastewater.
40
7. Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning:
South: Residence/RS-3, Residential Single Family
East: Atlantic Ocean
West: Vacant/RS-6, Residential Single Family
North: Residence/RS-3, Residential Single Family
8. Specific criteria for guest cottages: [Sec. 25.1(c)].
i. Shall be an accessory structure or portion of a
principal single family dwelling.
ii. Shall not be located closer than fifteen (15) feet to
the principal dwelling on the lot.
iii. No guest pottage may be utilized for commercial
purposes.
iv. The guest cottage ;L�Yiall only be used for the inter-
mittent or temporary occupancy by a non-paying guest.
Section 25.1 of the Zoning Code, Regulations for Specific Land
Uses, details specific criteria to be considered when'reviewing a
guest cottage for approval as a special exception use. All of the
criteria have been met. The special exception process allows the
Board of County Commissioners to impose any additional conditions
to ensure compatibility of the proposed use with surrounding
property, and the staff recommends the imposition of a
requirement that the applicant record -a document in the public
records that prohibits the guest house from ever being rented.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners grant special exception approval with the
following condition:
1. Prior to release of the approved site plan, a document,
acceptable to the County Attorney, shall be recorded in the
public records stating that the guest cottage shall not be
rented separately from the main house.
Commissioner Bird asked.if there was a possibility that the
guest cottage could be chopped off and become a separate house,
and Planner Stan Boling stated that it is possible with the
removal of some of the structures. However, if that is attempted
in the future, staff would check the setbacks and see if that
could be done.
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, the
Chairman declared the Public Hearing closed.
,OCT 2
41 BOOK 69 PAGE 751
phi 2 0.1987'
BOOK 69 PAGE 752
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously granted
special exception approval to Tomas Vara for a guest
cottage with the condition that prior to release of the
approved site plan, a document, acceptable to the
County Attorney, shall be recorded in the public
records stating that the guest cottage shall not be
rented separately from the main house.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING UTILITY STANDARDS
The Board reviewed the following utility standards:
13.05 EARTHWORK AND BACKFILL
All excavation for utilities and/or house connections shall be
adequately guarded with barricades and lights so as to protect the
public from hazard. Streets, sidewalks, driveways, curbs, parkways
and other public property disturbed in the course of the work shall
be restored in a manner satisfactory to the Division of Utility
Services.
Foundation material used for pipe bedding, from a minimum six-inch
distance below the pipe.invert to the lower half point of the pipe,
shall be bank run sand and gravel or crushed stone. Pipe embedment
material from the lower -half point to 12 inches above the top of the
pipe shall be bank run sand and gravel. Crushed stone or gravel
shall not be used as foundation material for truss pipe or PVC pipe.
A. INSTALLATION OF SEWER LINES
All gravity sewer installation procedures must be in accordance with
pipe manufacture's recommendations. All gravity sewers and force
mains shall be installed to have a minimum cover of '36".
Installation of gravity sewers shall be controlled by use of a laser
to maintain proper grade.
Installation' -of force mains shall be in accordance with AWWA
Standard C600 and the installation specifications for water lines in
the water distribution section, irrespective of the type of pipe
selected.
a) Trench --Trench width shall be kept to a minimum necessary for
installation of the pipe. The trench bottom shall be graded
uniformly to match the slope of the pipe.
b) Backfill - Only good quality backfill, free of stones, roots,
rocks, broken cement or other material which might be damaging
to the .pipe, shall be used. Backfill shall be put in the
trench in uniform lifts.
C) Compaction - All fill must be compacted by hand tamping from
under the pipe up to the center line. Backfill shall be
compacted in lifts up to the surface to achieve a minimum
compaction of 95% of maximum density in accordance with AAHO
T-180 and ASTM D-2167.
42
d) Dewatering - Construction shall be accomplished in a dry
trench. Wellpointing will be required as necessary. Upon
completion of the construction, the wellpoint holes shall be
filled with grout. All water entering excavations or other
parts of the work shall be contained, collected and.pumped to
suitable places for disposal.
e) Sheeting - Sheeting and shoring shall be installed as may be
necessary for the protection of the work, preservation of
adjacent property and structures, and the safety of employees.
Sheeting and bracing shall uniform to OSHA requirements.
B. Installation of Water Mains - Installation must be in accordance
with latest AWWA Standard C600 irrespective of the type of pipe
selected. All installation procedures must also be in
conformance with pipe manufacturer's recommendations. Minimum
cover shall be 36" from the center line of the pipe. Magnetic
I.D. tape shall be placed in the trench over PVC pipe, 12"
below grade. Allowable deflection at the pipe joints and
curvature of PVC pipe shall not exceed the manufacture's
specifications.
a) Trench - Trench width shall be kept to a minimum necessary for
pipe installation. The trench bottom shall be graded and
alignment shall be parallel with the roadway where possible.
b) Backfill - Only good quality packfill, free of stones, roots,
rocks, broken cement, or other material which might be damaging
to the pipe shall be used. Backfill must be put in the trench
in lifts.
C) Compaction - All pipe must be compacted by hand tamping to the
center line, under the pipe. Backfill shall be compacted in
lifts up to the surface to achieve a minimum compaction of 950
of maximum density in accordance with AASHO T-180 and ASTM
D-2167.
d) Thrust blocks - Concrete thrust blocks must be installed
against undisturbed soil at each bend, under valves and
hydrants, behind trees and hydrants at reducers, crosses, and
at the end of the line. Thrust blocks shall be designed to
resist forces created by 200 psi.
e) Dewatering - Construction shall be accomplished in a dry
trench. Wellpointing will be required as necessary. Upon the
completion of the construction, the wellpoint holes shall be
filled with gout. All water entering excavations or other
parts of the work shall be contained, collected and pumped to
suitable places for disposal.
f) Sheeting - Sheeting and shoring shall be installed as may be
necessary for the protection of the work, preservation of
adjacent property and structures and the safety of employees.
Sheeting and bracing shall uniform to OSHA requirements.
Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that sometime in
the early 1980s, the County simply adopted the standards of the
City of Vero Beach, and these are no longer specific enough since
the County is doing much more construction now than the City. He
recommended that the Board adopt by resolution the utility
standards as set out above.
43 BOOK 69 PAGE 753
T 0.197
OCT 2 Q .1987 Bou 69 Fa,r 754
Chairman Scurlock asked if there were any questions. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 87-128, adopting utility standards for all
water and sewer construction permitted by Indian River
County.
STANDARDS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
44
RESOLUTION NO. 87- 128
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ADOPTING UTILITY STANDARDS FOR ALL WATER
AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMITTED BY
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
WHEREAS, Indian River County operates a water and
wastewater system in Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Utility Ordinance creating the Utility
Department requires that all utility construction be
performed to certain standards, as the standards may be
amended from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the consulting engineers for the County, Camp,
Dresser & McKee, under direction from the County, have
revised the County Utility Standards and have recommended
that they be used for all future utility construction;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. The attached utility standards entitled "Indian
River County Water and Wastewater Utility Standards, May,
1987," are hereby adopted as the County Utility Standards,
replacing all others; and
2. The Division of Utility Services is authorized to
charge a fee of $10.00 for each copy of the Standards.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Wheeler _ who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Eggert and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Vice -Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly
passed and adopted this 20thday of October , 1987.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
�\ Atte t By on C. Scurlock, J
Chairman
AT
re a rigtit, Ur -
Approved as to form Appr ved for Utilty ma ters.
and legal sufficiency:
1.
it ar es i tunac er a ee r
County Attorney Div. of Utility Se vices
Attachment: Indian River County
Water and Wastewater
Utility Standards, May, 1987
OCT 2 0 1987 45 BOOK
69 u,ki-:755
OCT 2 o 1997 BOOK 69 PA .)F.756
IRC JAIL, PHASE II, FLOOR DRAINS AND FLOOR TILES
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/13/87:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: CHARLES P. BALCZUN
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H. T. DE
OWNER'S AUTHO ZED REPRESENTATIVE
SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL - PHASE II
FLOOR DRAINS AND FLOOR TILES
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1987
M
Bill Baird, former Jail Administrator, made a routine inspection of the
subject facility and found three areas of major concern. W. -R.
Frizzell, Architect for the project was put on notice after inspection
and confirmation by this writer.
Mr. Dalas Disney, the architect's project manager for the jail project, --
investigated our concerns and provided plans to eliminate the problem.
Mr. Disney was informed that I felt this problem should have been _
addressed during design and the County should only be responsible for
labor and material to make the corrections.
Since the General Contractor is presently under liquidated damages and
would require additional time, overhead, and cost for his sub-
contractor to perform this work, I recommended the work be contracted
directly with sub -contractors qualified to make these corrections.
W. R. Frizzell has followed this recommendation and acquired pricing
directly with the sub -contractor who performed the original work in the
specified areas.
The total cost of this work.'is $8,860.90. The County will pay
$7,635.90 and W. R. Frizzell will pay $1,225.00 plus all cost of
design.
Since jails are notorious for flooding by inmates and recognizing the
damage that could be caused to the flooring, Staff recommends Board
approval and authorization to have the work performed.
Administrator Balczun noted that Sonny Dean, who is the
authorized representative on this project, is not here this
morning. However, Mr. Dean and staff have discussed this matter
extensively and feel that there is no other alternative than to
have this work done.
Chairman Scurlock felt that since this work should have been
included in the original design, the architect should be
responsible for paying more than what is proposed. He believed
we have some leverage since this same architect will be doing the
third phase of the Jail. He pointed out that the architect was
paid'7o of construction costs of almost $4.2 million, and he felt
46
r
l
�1
that substantial fee should have included state of the art
design.
Administrator Balczun advised that Pat Carroll of Frizzell
Architects has indicated up front that these items were not
included in the original design. When we met with him on the
subject, he further admitted that these items were discussed with
the Jail personnel during construction, and he has notes
reflecting those discussions. However, Mr. Carroll emphasized
that once the design of the facility was approved, no written
authorization was forwarded to him by Jail personnel for a design
change.
Chairman Scurlock pointed out that we didn't hire jailers to
design the jail and paid 7% to Frizzell to anticipate these
problems in the design.
Attorney Vitunac advised that the architect's contract for
Phase III will be on next week's Agenda, and that Mr. Carroll has
stated that when he mentioned that this work be done in the
beginning, the County refused to do the change order.
Chairman Scurlock wondered who made that decision because
the Board certainly didn't, but felt that perhaps is the reason
why a certain person is no longer with the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board authorized payment
of $7,635.90 for the addition of floor drains and
ceramic flooring on Phase I of the Jail, with the
understanding that Frizzell Architects will pay
$1,225 plus all cost of design, as recommended by
staff.
AGREEMENT MAKING ANNUAL COUNTY FAIR A STATE AUTHORIZED
COUNTY FAIR
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/14/87:
47
OCT 2 fD 1981
ROOK 69 r,�GF757
OCT 2 ® I7
aooK 69 Far.758
TO: Board of County"Commissioners
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: October 14, 1987
RE: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FAIR
B.C.C. MEETING OCTOBER 20, 1987
The attached agreement is between the State of Florida and
the County and would make the annual Indian River County
Fair a state -authorized county fair, just as if it were
given by an independent corporation under the dictates of
Chapter 616, Florida Statutes.
The Fair was originally sponsored by the Indian River County
Fair Corp. composed of parties interested in county fairs
including County 'representatives and the Vero Beach
Firefighters Association. The Board decided last year that
to better control operational and financial matters the Fair
should become an authorized function of the Board of County
Commissioners rather than. a function of an independent
corporation. To retain the -benefits provided by the state,
however, the County had to agree to comply with Chapter 616,
which is what the attached agreement would do.
If this contract is signed the Board of County Commissioners
will have to contract with someone to present the Fair, and
it is expected that the Firefighters Association will again
contract with the County to give the Fair. Please see the
attached letter from Mr. Joseph Earman, Jr.,
Secretary -Treasurer of the Vero Beach Firefighters
Association, which evinces their intent to negotiate with
the County for the upcoming Fair.
Staff recommends approval of this contract and requests
—-authorization from the Board for the Chairman to execute it
on behalf of the County.
Attorney Vitunac advised that this agreement will make the
fair a state -authorized county fair, and reported that Bob
Komarinetz is in the process of negotiating a contract with the
fire fighters concerning the county fair. In fact, they have
submitted a contract which will be on next week's Agenda.
1
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved
the Agreement between the State and the County making
the Indian River County Fair a state -authorized county
fair, and authorized the Chairman's signature.
48
_9/1/87.1(Legal)Agree2(�
A G R E E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, made this Z Z day of ,
1987, by and between STATE OF -=IDA DEPARTIVENT
AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Room 1003, The Capitol,
Tallahassee, FL 32301, (904) 488-9790 (DEPARTMENT), and
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, apolitical subdivision .of the State of
Florida, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, (305)
567-8000 (COUNTY),
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, §125.01(1)(f) and §125.01(1)(w), Florida
Statutes, provide that the COUNTY shall have the power to
provide recreation and cultural facilities and programs and
perform any acts not inconsistent with law which acts are in
the common interests of the people of the COUNTY; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 616, Florida Statutes, provides
for the holding of county fairs which serve an entire county
and the exhibits of which are in accordance with §616.17 in
which premiums or awards are given to exhibitors of the
fair; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 616, F.S., provides that a county
fair may be run by an association not-for-profit formed for
the purposes of giving a county fair; and
WHEREAS, in Indian River County the Board of
County Commissioners itself wishes to own and operate a
permanent county -fair facility under control of the Board;
and
WHEREAS, the Board wishes to have its county fair
authorized by the state as if it were run by a fair
corporation as defined in Chapter 616; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY believes that a fair under the
control of the Board of County Commissioners will be more in
the public interest than one operated by a private
corporation since the Board has the administrative and legal
controls in place already to efficiently and legally provide
a top-quality county fair with proper audit controls and
accountability for cash income and expenses;
NOW, THEREFORE, the DEPARTMENT and the COUNTY
agree as follows:
1. The COUNTY shall be authorized to present an
annual county fair in compliance with §616.17 and in which
premiums or awards are given to exhibitors of the fair.
The fair shall be given for the benefit and development of
the educational, agricultural, horticultural, livestock, and
other resources of the COUNTY. Agricultural products shall
be typical of those produced in the county.
2. As far as is legally possible, the COUNTY
shall comply with all requirements of Chapter 616 relating
to the holding of a county fair and shall comply with the
rules and regulations adopted by the DEPARTMENT for county
fairs.
3. The DEPARTMENT reserves the right to inspect
and audit the fair as if it were a fair given under Chapter
616, Florida Statutes. In particular the COUNTY agrees that
it will cooperate with the DEPARTMENT in performing audits
of the financial affairs concerning the fair and shall
comply with suggestions and recommendations of the
DEPARTMENT to improve financial and fiscal controls at the
fair with the result that all income and expenses of the
fair are properly accounted for.
OCT o ���� Ruols 69 F'Nu '759
1
ill CT 2 0 0937 BOOK 69 PaGF 760
4. The COUNTY reserves the right to contract with
a fair operator for the actual presentation of the fair.
5. The COUNTY shall appoint a Fairgrounds
Advisory Committee of not less than seven members chosen to
represent as far as practicable the various groups
throughout the county which may be interested in a County
Fair, including agricultural, citrus, cattle, and
horticultural interests in the county.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the DEPARTMENT and the COUNTY
have executed this AGREEMENT on the date set forth next to
their signatures.
Date -?— 2.2--97
Witness
Ali 't , &—A�
i W1tnes
Date /D •o20 .gz
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
r fl
Ch-
Ch—a--r—es P. Vitunac
Co,unty Attorney -
roved for Administrative
t-ers.: _ n
Administ'hator
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF LEON
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER
SERVICES
By f
(Corp. Seal)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By /�.. c��l�d�
~bon—C'Scur l ock
Chairman 2y
(Corp. Seal)
1 HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an
officer duly authori;ed to take acknowledgments, personally
appeared , &ZL4j/; to me known to be the
individual who lexecuted the foregoing instrument and he
acknowledged before me that he executed the same on behalf
of STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER
SERVICES.
WITNESS my hand and official seal irk the County
and State last aforesaid this g9a day of r?
198.7. 01
t
16)c aj�'
Nq
. a ry Pub I i &
2
� � r
PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Commissioner Bird reviewed the following Summary of Actions:
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS
OCTOBER 13, 1987
Doug Upton submitted a scaled drawing of the proposed remote
control racetracks he would like to have constructed at the
Fairground. The Committee was receptive to the concept, and
suggested that the drawing be given to the Fairground consultant
to see if the racetracks could be worked into the Fairground
Master Plan. Commissioner Bird, Jim Davis, and Doug Upton will
meet together next week to go out to the Fairground and determine
the best site for the tracks. Mr. Upton will look over the
mudbogging lease, and come in with a proposal patterned after
that lease.
David Palmer again requested that public skateboard ramps be
constructed at Kiwanis-Hobart Park. The Committee members
expressed concern over the liability situation that the County
might _incur. It was decided that the County will check with its -
insurance company to see what affect the ramps would have on our
insurance rates, and David was instructed to contact various
civic groups to see if there is any community interest in
supporting the construction of public skateboard ramps.
Pat Callahan reported on the Fall Program in Gifford Park. Among
other activities, for the next 8 Saturdays, local tennis pros
will conduct tennis• clinics at Gifford Park. from 11:00 a.m. to
12:00 noon.
Commissioner Bird advised that the Committee will be coming
back to the Board with more specifics on the above projects. He
was upset about the editorial that appeared in the Press Journal
recently which seemed to miss the mark entirely about the way the
two young men were treated by the Parks & Recreation Committee
when presenting their request for skateboard ramps. Commissioner
Bird emphasized that the young men had made an excellent
presentation and really impressed the Committee. He believed the
Committee has done nothing except to encourage them to continue
to try to generate support from the community for their project.
Chairman Scurlock also felt the criticism was unfair, and
pointed out that two private skateboard ramp ventures down
towards Ft. Pierce failed because of lack of support and the high
cost of liability.
50
0 19B7 Boa 69 Fa,c 761
OCT 2 ® 1987
FIREARMS RANGE COMMITTEE REPORT
ROOK 69 PAF 762
Commissioner Bird reviewed the following Summary of Actions:
FIREARMS RANGE COMMITTEE
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS
OCTOBER 15, 1987
The Committee endorsed the concept of the interim range at the
old stump dump for a law enforcement practice range, with the
hope that the public will be able to utilize the range until a
permanent range can be constructed.
The Committee also asked that.,.a request to sent to the St. Johns
River Water Management<'District for approximately 200 acres for a
firearms range on the east side of CR -512 north of SR -60 running
north to the dike.
Jim Davis will provide Commissioner Bird with an aerial view of
the property, and he and Bill Stegkemper will look at the area
and come up with a recommendation as to the proper place to
construct a firearms range in the requested area.
TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REPORT
Commissioner Wheeler reviewed the following Summary of
Actions:
TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS
OCTOBER 14, 1987
The Indian River Arts Council requested $5,000 from the Tourist_
Development Fund and the Tourist Development Council recommended
that the $5,000 come from the surplus funds overbudget generated
by District 1 (City of Vero Beach) under the criterion of
promoting and advertising tourism; this recommendation is being
made not only to promote and advertise tourism, but to an
established non-profit organization that has been performing the
service in the community.
The Tourist Development Council recommended that the Board of
County Commissioners send a resolution to the State of Florida
asking the Department of Revenue to submit a list of the people
who are currently paying the tourist tax to make sure they have
been appropriately allocated to the districts.
51
Commissioner Wheeler advised that the Arts Council wishes to
hire an executive director to promote the arts in Indian River
County, and one of the suggestions made was to work with travel
agencies to conduct 3-4 day tours of Vero Beach, showing what
this area has to offer in the way of the arts and other
activities, such as Dodgertown, etc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved
the request by the Indian River Arts Council for
$5,000; funds to come from the surplus funds overbudget
generated by District 1 (City of Vero Beach) under the
criterion of promoting and advertising tourism.
Commissioner Wheeler noted that the -resolution asking the
Florida Department of Revenue to submit a list of the people who
are currently paying the tourist tax was adopted earlier this
morning under Item V on the Consent Agenda.
REACTIVATION OF CITY/COUNTY BIKE PATH COMMITTEE
Commissioner Bird advised that after the Planning staff
indicated it would be nice to have a committee to work with on
the various bike paths, he talked it over with the City and the
City has indicated that they also would like to see the committee
reactivated. The suggested makeup of the committee is one County
Commissioner, one representative of the County Parks & Recreation
Committee, one City Councilman, one representative of the City
Recreational Committee, a member of the School Board, and two
members at large to be named from biking enthusiasts, PTA, etc.
,,OCT r7 52
800Y 69 FACE 763
BOOK 69 PAGE.��
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously
approved the reestablishment of the City/County
Bike Path Committee, and appointed Commissioner Bird
to serve on that Comnitte and designate a
representative from the Parks & Recreation Committee.
PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT - LIBRARY SITES
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/19/87:
TO: Board of County Commis s ioneDATE: October 19, 1987 FILE:
SUBJECT: Library Sites
FROM: Chairman Carlyn REFERENCES: Eggert e11 REFERENCES:
Public Library Advisory Board
On Wednesday, October 14, 1987 the Public Library Advisory Board
made the following recommendations:
NORTH COUNTY LIBRARY SITE:
0
1.
Sebastian Lakes
6-1-1
2.
Chesser Gap
1-6-1
3.
Fischer
1-1-4
(2 ballots with only 2 votes)
(Staff preferred Fischer site)
MAIN
LIBRARY SITE:
1.
Grace Lutheran area & parking
6-0-1
2.
Catron
1-6-1
3.
McArthur
1-2-4
(2 ballots with only 2 votes)
(Staff preferred McArthur site)
REQUEST: Public Hearing for Library Sites to be approved and
. date set.
53
Commissioner Eggert requested that we hold a public hearing
on the final selection of the library sites, and Chairman
Scurlock felt that the Board should authorize staff to begin
negotiating a purchase price on all the sites so that information
will be available at the public hearing.
Commissioner Eggert advised that we have appraisals on all
the properties, but she would like to see staff prepare an
overlay for the property one block north to see how the 35,000
square feet facility lies on the 2.09 acres and also taking out
the 25 ft. setbacks to see what we have left for parking.
Further, she wished to see an overlay of the parking where the
building could be increased to 50,000 square feet sometime in the
future. Commissioner Eggert felt all of this would allow u's to
see exactly where we are so that we are not going out and seeking
an unnecessary amount for parking. -
Chairman Scurlock felt we would be in a better negotiating
position if we keep all of our options open in terms of the sites.
Commissioner Bird asked how large a site we need for the
main library, and Commissioner Eggert advised that we are looking
for 5 acres. She emphasized that the one thing the Advisory
Committee does not want to do is go up. There has been a lot of
discussion regarding a one-story vs. 2 -story facility, and that
is why she would like to see overlays on all the sites so that we
will know exactly what the library would look like on each site.
Commissioner Bird wished to see an aerial scale drawing of
each of the sites we are referring to, and a templet of the
square feet showing the parking on each of the sites.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously authorized
the Administrator to proceed and negotiate a price on
all the library sites, with that information to be
presented at a public hearing during the regular
meeting of November 17th.
54 Boo.. 69 PA;F 765
W"X01
BOOK U 7
PUBLIC MEETING/WORKSHOP REGARDING SOLID WASTE UTILITY
BILLING SYSTEM
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
in the matter of '
in the Court, was pub•
Ilshed in said newspaper in the issues of
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida. each daily and has been
entered as second class mall matter at the post office in Vero Beach• in said Indian River Coun-
ty. Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate• commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advenisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscri be a me isday of 18
(S rtes nor
(Clerk of the Circuit Court. Indian River CotW, Florida)
MEAL)
,..sir _. .ter .. r•v«
NOTICE OF PUBLIC ME TING/WORKSHOP
;w. Notice is hereby given that a Board of County Commis=
a-0sioners of Indian River.. ;. unty :will hold. a public
�} meeting /workshop in the C. my Commission Chambers,
:'°Indian River.: County Adml tration Building, '''{840 25ths,
.Street, Vero Beach, FL 3296 on Tuesday, October 20, 1987
at 9:05 AM to discuss the; plementation of the proposed
Indian River County Solid.. ste Utility Billing System for all P
commercial and residents improved real property. This
meeting will be for the sol purpose of answering questions
and concerns regarding thf Solid Waste Utility Billing System
proposal. Information pacets may be obtained prior to the
public meeting/workshop at the Indian River County Utilities
Department, 1840 25th Stfeet, Vero Beach, FL, or by contact .
Ing the Department at telphone 567-8000, extension 465.
- All interested parties will be (heard. Dated this 9th Day of
October, 1987• �'
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Don C. Scurlock, Jr., Chairman
- ..b L'.r`•;'ig'r''Zfs•: t:as. : Via.. sprit
55
Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that sometime back
the Board authorized staff to proceed with the study of what is
needed to fund the Landfill. It will cost $1.6 million to close
the landfill to make it environmentally safe, and another $2.25
million will be needed to open a 23 -acre cell nearby.
Representatives of Camp, Dresser and McKee, environmental
consultants, are here today to explain the funding methodology
used by some of the other counties in Florida, and to present a
fee system which they feel would be the most equitable to the
residents of Indian River County. With that in mind, Director
Pinto introduced Bob Hauser and Isabelle Jettinghoff of Camp,
Dresser and McKee.
Isabelle Jettinghoff explained that their firm set out to
find an equitable and fair way to cover solid waste costs, and
pointed out that the report covers two aspects: 1) the rates
themselves, and 2) the billing system to collect the money we
need to fund the Landfill. National data, as well as information
collected locally, helped determine on an average how much
commercial and residential waste was generated in the county on
an annual basis. The basic unit for the County's charge will be
based on one residential home, which is estimated nationally to
produce 1.3 tons of solid waste a year. At this time, they are
looking at a $30 per unit annual service charge that would show
up on the tax bill beginning in 1988. The charge may be less
than that, depending on final calculations. Commercial,
industrial, and institutional properties would be charged on a
percentage based on units, square footage, or in the case of a
hospital, the number of beds.
Ms. Jettinghoff advised that other proposed changes include
impact fees for new construction and eliminating one of six
collection centers now in use. The impact fee is estimated at
$40 for a new single-family residence.
T 2 0. �196Y 56 ?JuK 69PAGE 767
OCTFF,-
2 0
1987
Pool(
69
I
FAUE 76.8
Chairman Scurlock
felt that one of the questions
that
the
public will ask is whether the annual charge is actually a rate
increase.
Director Pinto explained that we had an interim increase
just recently which is meeting the needs of the existing bond
issue and operation, but there will be a new debt service with
the building of the new cell at the Landfill. If this type of
billing system is selected, the County will insist that all rates
that were designated to the tipping system be removed. County
residents who are already paying for garbage collection services
should see a proportionate rate decrease in their bills when the
county's service charge goes into effect. That is because the
Landfill tipping fees will be paid by homeowners in the County's
yearly service charge, instead of their paying a disposal fee as
part of the private collection service. However, Rural
Sanitation and Harris Sanitation, the two county -franchised
garbage haulers in the unincorporated area, conceivably could
11, keep their rates•the same, or increase them, if they can justify
other expenses when their franchises are reviewed before the
Board of County Commissioners. The County will be responsible
for collecting from their customers, and that charge will be on
the annual property tax bill. The first bills will be part of
the 1988 tax bills received in October, 1988, and payable by
March 31, 1989. The free ride will be over for many citizens who
now use the transfer stations.
Chairman Scurlock asked if there is an appeal process on
this charge, and Director Pinto stated that process is specified
in the draft ordinance and will be part of the final ordinance.
Commissioner Bird asked how we would differentiate between
an undeveloped lot and a lot with a house on it, and Director
Pinto explained that only improved lots would be charged.
Commissioner Bird asked if there would be a charge for
citrus grove property, and Director Pinto advised there would
not.
57
Commissioner Bird asked if there were any alternatives and
what were other counties doing.
Director Pinto stated that the more sophisticated counties,
which have the cooperation of their constitutional officers, are
leaning towards an annual fee.
Chairman Scurlock noted that the two factors that most
affect whether things get delivered to the Landfill are distance
and dollars and cents.
Lengthy discussion took place on just how people wishing to
dump at the Landfill would be identified as to what property
generated the trash, and Director Pinto explained that people who
pay the annual charge will be allowed to dispose free of charge
at the Landfill or convenience centers. Only special waste will
require an extra fee. He pointed out, however, that no matter
what system is devised, there still will be some people who will
figure out a way to get through without paying.• This problem was
discussed extensively during the workshops, and it was felt that
it would be far more costly in time and money to try and plug up
any holes in the plan than it would be to accept the loss of fees
incurred through cheating.
Commissioner Bird asked if it would be fairer to charge a
proportionate fee for the units that generate more trash, and
Director Pinto was confident that our basis for waste generation
is fair. It would be impossible to monitor it on an individual
basis, so we have taken local data in line with national data
collected specifically for Indian River County.
The Board then reviewed the following solid waste unit
chart:
DDT Z 0 1987 58 ROOK 69 FacE 769
r-_ 1
OCT d BOOK 69 F'AGE 770
Category
Residential:
Single-family
Multifamily
Other Residential
Institution/
overnmen
Schools
Hospitals
Other/Other
Commercial/
n us ria
Sm. Retail/
Outlets/
Department Store/
Shopping Center
Supermarket
Office
Restaurants
Mobile Home Parks
Storage/Warehouse
Recreation
Campground
Hotel/Motel
Light
Manufacturing
Heavy
Manufacturing
Food Processing
Vacant Commercial
Special Category
Lot Clearing
Tires
IRC
Classification No.
01, 02
03, 04, 05, 08
06, 07, 74, 75
Solid Waste
Units
1.0
0.75 per unit
0.70 per bed
72, 83, 84 0.10/100 sq. ft.
73, 85 2.8/bed
71 (office only) .15/100 sq. ft.
76, 77, 78, 79,
86, 87, 88, 89
11, 12, 20, 25, 30 .60/100 sq. ft.
13, 16, 26 .90/100 sq. ft.
14
.4 unit
1.3/100 sq.
ft.
17,
18,
19, 23, 24
.15/100 sq.
ft.
21,
22,
23
.5/100 sq.
ft.
28
1.0
.75/unit
29,
48,
49
.3/100 sq.
ft.
31,
32,
34, 35,
.25/100 sq.
ft.
37,
38
(Special
36
.4 unit
39
.4/unit
(room)
41, 43, 47
.35/100
sq. ft.
42
Special
Survey
44, 45, 46
.70/100
sq. ft.
40
1.0
All other categories are 0.0
Special Fee
Special Fee
Commissioner Wheeler asked why mobile home parks are not
included in residential, and Director Pinto explained that the
owner of a park will receive a bill on his tax bill for every
unit in his park, and will have the responsibility to pass that
cost on to his renters. In the case where someone has a mobile
home'on his own lot, he will receive a charge on his tax bill
just like any other residential owner.
59
Bob Hauser of CDM pointed out that mobile home units will
pay the same rates, whether they are individually owned or paying
rent in a mobile park.
Attorney Vitunac noted that the proposed ordinance sets up
the framework of how the collection system will work, but does
not actually say which system will be used. There are two
approaches -- through a municipal service taxing unit or through
the fire districts.
Chairman Scurlock noted that the City of Vero Beach has
encouraged us to move in this direction, and Director Pinto
explained that the City will have to separate the cost of
collection and transportion from the cost of dumping at the
Landfill.
Commissioner Bird asked if this plan involves a fewer number
of transfer stations (convenience centers], and Director Pinto
advised that one station is going to have to be eliminated, but
could not say which one it will be at the present time. At
present there are six transfer stations: Oslo Road, Fellsmere,
County Fairgrounds, Winter Beach, South Gifford Road, and at the
old stump dump. The five remaining convenience centers will be
upgraded and manned.
Mr. Hauser showed slides of some of the transfer stations
and the Landfill.
Commissioner Bird asked what the next step is after this,
and Director Pinto advised that another hearing is being held
tomorrow night in the north county, but noted that in order to
have the ordinance effective by next year's tax billing, the
proposed ordinance must be adopted at a public hearing sometime
before January 1, 1988.
Commissioner Bird felt the notice of that public hearing
should be something more than the ordinary notice and contain an
explanation of this complex issue.
Commissioner Wheeler suggested that the notice contain the
amount of the annual fee.
OCT 04 0 1987 60 BOOK 69 f'nu 771
ICT 2 ®
1987
BOOK
69e
Favi 772
2a
The Chairman opened
the public hearing, and asked
if
anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Nancy Offutt, representing the Board of Realtors, asked how
the commercial rate would equate with the $30 annual charge,
which she understands is just an estimate, and Director Pinto
explained that using the equation formula for,commercial, where
you see a .4 per 100 sq. ft., that would be .4 of the estimated
$30 charge.
Mrs. Offutt noted that vacant commercial is 1.0, and asked
if that is considered a residential rate or is it 1.0 per 100
square feet.
Ms. Jettinghoff explained that since vacant commercial still
generates some trash, they set that as a minimal fee, which would
be the same as a residential unit. Property has to be vacant six
months out of the year in order to be considered vacant
commercial.
Mrs. Offutt asked how time-sharing units would be handled,
and Director Pinto stated that time-sharing units are still
residential units, and -the bills would go to the owners. How the
cost is to be divided up amongst the owners of a unit is another
matter, but there is some pending legislation to straighten all
that out. Most likely, those type of service charges are going
to be the responsibility of the owners' association.
Commissioner Eggert left the meeting at 11:30 o'clock A.M.
in order to attend another meeting.
Mrs. Offutt also asked when it would known what the impact
fees will be, and Director Pinto said that they are anticipating
an impact fee of $40 per year per unit.
Attorney Robert Stone, representing Harris Sanitation, asked
if the County is leaning towards mandatory collection, and
Chairman Scurlock felt that at some point we will have mandatory
collection, but we are not sure at what point that will be.
Director Pinto advised that staff is putting together some
figures now for use by the consultant in a recommendation of
61
whether there should be mandatory collection or more franchised
garbage collectors.
There being no others who wished to be heard, the Chairman
declared the public hearing closed.
0
There being no further business, on Motion duly made,
seconded and carried, the Chairman adjourned the meeting at 11:35
o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
ClerkChairman
f _ —.
OCT 2 0 1987 1 62 BOOK 69 Fac('73