HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/22/1988Tuesday, November 22, 1988
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission
Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday,
November 22, 1988, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Don C.
Scurlock, Jr., Chairman; Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman; Richard
N.' Bird; Margaret C. Bowman; and Carolyn K. Eggert. Also present
were William G. Collins, 11, Acting County Administrator; Charles
P. Vitunac, Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; and
Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
Reverend Ray Snow of First Nazarene Church gave the
invocation, and Chairman Scurlock led the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
Students from Glendale Elementary School gave a Patriotic
Presentation in observance of Thanksgiving, an American holiday.
The presentation was thoroughly enjoyed by the Board and those in
attendance, and the Chairman thanked the children for coming.
5noK
NOV 2 2 1988
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Chairman Scurlock requested the addition to today's Agenda
of a budget amendment for a computer link up with the Health
Dept. in their transfer to the hospital complex.
Commissioner Eggert added the following 4 items:
1. Appointment to the IRC Housing Authority Board
2. Vero Beach Community Redevelopment Agency
3. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
4. Cancellation of BCC meeting between Christmas
and New Year (December 27th meeting).
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously added the
above items to today's Agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or
additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of October 11,
1988, and October 18, 1988. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved
the Minutes of the Regular -Meetings of 10/11/88 and
10/18/88, as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Bowman requested that Item D be removed from
the Consent Agenda for discussion.
2
NOV 2 21988
L
BOOK 75 F,1GE 214
A. Reports
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/8/88:
FREDA WRIGHT
CLERK, CIRCUIT COURT AND RECORDER
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
(305) 56778000
NOVEMBER 8, 1988
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
P. 0. BOX 1028
VERO BEACH . FLORIDA
32961-1028
FM: TRAFFIC VIOLATION BUREAU - SPECIAL TRUST FUND
MONTH OF OCTOBER 1988
FINES $29,067.06
COURT COSTS 11,055.00
LOCAL LAW 904.00
BOND ESTREATURE 1,064.49
DEFENSIVE DRIVING SCHOOL 2,283.75
PUBLIC DEFENDER FEES 293.00
ANIMAL. CONTROL COLLECTIONS 415.50
TOTAL $45,082.80
CHECK NO. 006203
COPY ATTACHED
PMA
Received and placed on file in the office of the Clerk to
the Board:
Month to date report by last name for month of
October, 1988;
Report of Convictions, month of October, 1988;
Traffic Violations Bureau, Special Trust Fund,
month of October, 1988 -- $45,082.00
3
NOV 2 21999
BOOK. 5 // 5 Fg LADE 215
B. Report on Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions
Housing Assistance Payments Program
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/11/88:
TO: DATE:
The Honorable Members of
the Board. of County Commissioners
FROM: Finance
ovember 11, 1988
FILE:
SUBJECT: Report on voucher for Payment of
Annual Contributions - Housing
Assistance Payments Program
REFERENCES:
The attached HUD Forms 52681 and HUD Form 52595, covering the
1987/1988 Fiscal Year, were prepared by the Section 8 Rental
Assistance staff with the concurrence of the Finance Department.
We respectfully request that the Honorable members of the Board
of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman's signature for
submission to the U.S. Department ent of Housing and Urban Development.
ttIOV 2 2 1988
14
BOOK 75 rAn216
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman's signature on the voucher for submission
to the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development,
as requested by staff.
COPY OF VOUCHER IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO
THE BOARD
C. Release of County Liens
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/15/88:
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
FROM Lea R. Keller, County Attorney's Office
DATE: November 15, 1988
RE: CONSENT AGENDA - BCC MEETING 11/22/88
RELEASE OF COUNTY LIENS
I have processed the fol -lowing releases and request
permission for the Chairman to execute them:
Release of Water Assessment Lien
Bldg. 45 of VISTA PLANTATION
Release of Sewer Assessment Lien
Bldg. 45 of VISTA PLANTATION
Release of Assessment Lien - Willis
Lot 6 of BREEZEWOOD PARK S/D PBI 4-67
Release of Assessment Lien - Murphy
Lot 4 of SUNNYDALE ACRES
Lots 23 & 24 of SUNNYDALE ACRES SUBD.
Release of Assessment Lien - PLVAN
Back-up information for the above is on file in the County
Attorney's & Utilities Department Offices.
5
N 0 V 2 2 1988
BOOK 75 PAGE 21 7
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to execute the Releases listed above.
COPIES OF SAID RELEASES ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO
THE BOARD
D. Sale of Surplus Fairway Mowers
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/18/88:
TO:WULIAM G.COLLINS II DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 1988
ACTING COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM
GUS AMBLER C.P.M.
PURCHASING MANAGER
SUBJECT: SALE OF SURPLUS
FAIRWAY MOWERS
REFERENCES:
FILE:
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Sandridge Golf Course has requested that we declare several
Fairway Mowers surplus and scrap or sell them.
Because demand for mowers of this type is very limited
a formal surplus bid would not be practical.
It is my opinion that we should negotiate
for a contractor that will remove these mowers at
no cost to the County. If it is possible to find a mower
vendor that has interest in these then a sale maybe possible.
Otherwise we will try to find a scrap dealer to remove
these mowers at no cost to the County.
ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternative to negotiating would be to do a formal
sealed surplus property bid: The cost of this in administrative
paperwork will exceed any possible sale value.
Therefore, we should use our best judgement in disposing of
this equipment. This equipment has a value of less then $500.00.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the Fairway Mowers on the attached
list be declared surplus and that staff be authorized to
dispose of this equipment the most economical way without
formal sealed bids.
NOV 2 2 1988
6
BOOK 7b ME.218
Commissioner Bowman wondered if these mowers could be used
by someone else, and Commissioner Wheeler suggested storing them
until we have enough equipment to go to bid.
Commissioner Bird explained that these mowers were used when
we bought them from Johns Island. He did not feel they were
worth much as many of them have been cannibalized.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously declared
the fairway mowers as surplus and authorized staff to
dispose of them the most economical way without going
to formal sealed bids.
E. Authorization to Amend IRC Ordinances - SBCCI Technical Codes
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/15/88:
TO: William G. Collins, II
Acting County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keating, A'!CP
Director, Community Development Department
DATE: November 15, 1968
SUBJECT: Authorization to Amend Indian River County
Ordinances in reference to SBCCI Technical Codes
FROM: Ester L. Rymer, Director(
Building Division
\ v
It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the next
regularly scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS
The Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances provides for the
use of specific editions, with applicable revisions, of the Southern
Building Code Congress International (SBCCI) technical codes. These
codes are designed for adoption by state and local governments. .
7
NOV 221988
BOOK 75 FA GE 219
The purpose of the Standard Code is to protect the public's life,
health, and welfare in the built environment. The. use of
performance-based requirements encourages the use of innovative
building designs, materials, and construction systems while at the
same time recognizing the merits of the more traditional materials
and systems. This concept promotes maximum flexibility in building
design and construction as well as assuring a high degree of life
safety.
The Code incorporates, by reference, nationally recognized consensus
standards for use in judging,the performance of materials and sys-
tems. This provides for equal treatment of both innovative and
traditional materials and systems, provides for efficient introduc-
tion of new materials into the construction process, and assures a
high level of consumer protection.
The Standard Codes are updated annually with revisions, and a new
edition is published every three years.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
The current Indian River County code requires the use of the 1985
technical codes and the 1986 and 1987 revisions to those codes. At
the meeting of the Indian River County Building Code Board of Adjust-
ments and Appeals held Monday;- October 17, 1988, the Board voted
unanimously to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners the
adoption of the 1988 editions of the technical codes as follows:
STANDARD BUILDING CODE (SBC) 1988 EDITION, INCLUDING APPENDIX A
Ref: Article II, Section 4-31
STANDARD PLUMBING CODE (SPC) 1988 EDITION
Ref: Article VI, Section 4-91
• STANDARD MECHANICAL CODE (SMC) 1988 EDITION
Ref: Article VII, Section 4-101
STANDARD GAS CODE (SGC). 1988 EDITION
Ref: Article V, Section 4-81
STANDARD HOUSING CODE (SHC) 1988 EDITION
Ref: Article VIII, Section 4-406
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with the Indian River County Building Code Board of Ad-
justments and Appeals, and recommends the County Attorney be
instructed to prepare the necessary amendments to the referenced Ar-
ticles and Sections of the Indian River County Code for _presentation
to the Board of County Commissioners for their review prior to sched-
uling a public hearing.
N O V 2 21988
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized the
County Attorney to prepare the necessary amendments as
set out in the above staff recommendation.
8
BOOK F -"J. 220
F.
Final Plat Approval for Coralwind Subdivision
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/14/88:
TO:
William G. Collins II, Acting County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
&
Robert M. Ke tin
AICP
g, ICP
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Chief, Current Developmgnt
Staff Planner, Cu rent
FROM: Robert E. Wiegers
DATE: November 14, 1988
Development
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR CORALWINp SUBDIVISION
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of November 22, 1988.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Coralwind Subdivision is a 26
parcel located to the south of
Avenue. At its regular meeting
and Zoning Commission granted
subdivision.
lot subdivision of a ±10.0 acre
5th Street S.W. and east of 40th
of October 9th, 1987, the Planning
preliminary plat approval to the
The owner, Coral Group, Inc; is now requesting final plat approval
and has submitted:
1. a final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary -
plat;
2. a warranty maintenance agreement covering publically dedicat-
ed improvements (roads, drainage easements, utilities, etc.);
and
3. a letter of credit guaranteeing the warranty maintenance
-agreement.
ANALYSIS:
All required improvements have been constructed, and have been
inspected and approved by the Public Works and Utilities Depart-
ments. The County Attorney's office has reviewed and approved the
submitted warranty maintenance agreement and letter of credit.
All requirements for final plat approval have been satisfied.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant
final plat approval to the Coralwind Subdivision and accept the
submitted warranty maintenance agreement and letter of credit.
9
NOV 2 21988
L
ROOK 75 ria 221
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously granted
final plat approval to Coralwind Subdivision and
accepted the submitted warranty maintenance agreement
and letter of credit, as recommended by staff.
G. Appointment to Finance Advisory Committee
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/16/88:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Alice White, Agenda Coordinator
_FROM: ___ _ Jan Masi, Secretary to_the Finance Advisory,
Committee ». —
DATE: November 16, 1988
SUBJECT: Howard M-Dirks/Finance Advisory Committee
Howard M. Dirks has been nominated to fill the unexpired
term of the late Joseph Minotty, a Finance Advisory Committee
member who passed away a few months ago.
• It is recommended that Mr. Dirks be appointed to fill this
vacancy for the remainder of 1988, and then be appointed to serve
for a regular two-year term, or until January 1, 1991.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously appointed
Howard M. Dirks to the Finance Advisory Committee for
the remainder of 1988, and then for a regular 2 -year
term, or until January 1, 1991.
H. Exchange of Deeds with Fairlane Harbor Mobile Home Park
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/16/88:
OV221
10
BOOK 15
, ?
2
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: November 16, 1988
FILE:
SUBJECT: EXCHANGE OF DEEDS WITH
FAIRLANE HARBOR MOBILE
HOME PARK
William G. Collins
FROM Acting County Administrator REFERENCES:
The Board has apparently approved in concept a land swap with Fairlane
Harbor Mobile Home Park which gave Indian River County a portion of
right-of-way for Indian River Boulevard (see attached deed from Fairlane
Harbor Mobile Home Park).
Recommendation
recommend the Chairman be authorized to execute the attached deed to
Fairlane Harbor Mobile Home Park to complete the exchange.
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to execute the deed to Fairlane Harbor
Mobile Home Park to complete the exchange.
COPY OF DEED IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
I. Environmental Health Dept. - Purchase of Computer Equipment -
Budget Amendment #012
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/21/88:
TO: William G. Collins, II
Acting County Administrator
FROM: Robert M. Keating, AICP NA¢K
Community Development Director
DATE: November 21, 1988
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH MOVE
As you are aware, Environmental Health will be moving out of the
county administration building and onto the hospital campus soon.
Instead of occurring after the first of the year as I thought it
would, this move is scheduled for the first of the month. That
means that some action will need to be taken immediately.
11
NOV 2 21988
BOOK 75 F'1'_E 223
Environmental Health is an integral part of the building permit
system, and it must remain that way for the system to continue
functioning well. With the computerized tracking system,
timetables are always met and conflicts between septic
tanks/wells and utility systems are avoided. The continued
maintenance of this system depends on Environmental Health having
a computerized link to the system 38.
In discussing this situation With Don Hilton, Jim McGinnis (data
processing), Ester Rymer (building), and Mike Galanis
(environmental health), we agreed that the best resolution to
this problem would be to provide Environmental Health with a CRT
which could be connected to the system 38 with a telephone modem.
According to Don. Hilton, the equipment needed and the costs are
as follows:
1 CRT
2 modems
1 protocol board
$. ..500..00
800.00
1,500.00
There will also be an installation charge of $150.00 and a
monthly phone charge of $50.00. In addition, data processing
must extend the Planning Department's_ cable link to the 38 and
set up Environmental Health's existing CRT (which cannot be used
with a modem) in the Planning Department for interim use by
Environmental Health and permanent use by planning.
Once authorized, the equipment will be purchased and installed by
data processing. The funds, however, will come from the Building
Department enterprise account. To initiate the purchase and
installation process which will take approximately three weeks, I
need your authorization to have Joe Baird draft a Building
Department budget amendment to increase cash carried forward and
your authorization to request that this item be added to the
November 22, 1988 Board of County Commissioner agenda.
Please take action on this as soon as possible and forward this
to Joe Baird. If any questions arise regarding this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
NOV 221988
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
Budget Amendment #012 for the purchase of computer
equipment for Environmental Health, as recommended by
staff.
12
[BOOK 75 F•1 F.2?4
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Baird, OmB Director
THROUGH:
SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDIUMM
NUMBER: 012
DATE:
November 21st, 1981
Entry Number
Flan/Department/Account Name
I I
Revenue:
Building Dept -Cash Forward
Expense:
Building Department -Other op
supplies
Building Dept -telephone --
Account Number
441-000-389-040-00
441-233-524-035-29
441-233-524-034-11
Increase
• Ebcrease
.3,450
2,950
500
PUBLIC HEARING - VERO STOR-ALL'S REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A
PORTION OF 4TH PLACE (HARRIS ROAD)
The hour of 9:05 o'clock having passed, the Deputy Clerk
read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
• COUNTY OF INDIAN (OYER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann. Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal. a daily newspaper published
al Vero Bosch in Mellen River COunty. Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the matter of C RQNL.A. 'Rt'7O.X •
In the ++x.A c OCourt. was pub-
lished in meld newspaper in the feauee of {`ouQn l.. I I -1 O Ci
Al Rant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal Is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach. In odd Indian River County. Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida. each daily and has been
entered es second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, In said Indian River Chum
ty, Florida, for a period o1 one year nest preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and alOan% further says That he has neither paid nor promised any person. firm
or corporation any discount, rebate. commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication In the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
(SEAL)
NOV 2219R
tw{
of -f ICIT. A D 19 It S.
1.. �: r_
f 1=us1
h.(
Wort' Public. thee of Flee ldo •
Mt' a -aro men Far- es Arne 29. me
wr ft..r..�._
13
•
t1 g andd
1192. bhuaablunIO.ardard.thrs apete eon 1
watery
Doreen of Hints Read
deemn.
de FEOvrau o/d.,ez Wide fy61b In.ma
ins
more pabedig0;7dlescriedes
%described
WC
•i,iiFROMTsO CORNE.to .. OR.
THE
R.
QUARTER
. NORTHEAST QUARTER
13. TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH. RANGE 39
EAST •
Irp�7sq•jt liscl.RMAN WH ON THE OYVER COUNTY,ARTER
OECTION UNE A DISTANCE OF 41131
FEET TO AN INTERSEODON WRN.TMB
• EASIVy AY OF 7H8.01D
DIXHIGHWAY:
thane. RUN a 9f wee. ON t5A1D
WGHT.OF-WAY A DISTANCE -0P'
882.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION .:.
-WITH THE NORTH RIOIIT•OF-WAY ;OF
CORNER ROAD LANDACONVwest
EYED :
TO GULFSTREAAI LUMBER CO. AS DE%
SCRIBED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY • •
DEED FILED 11.O.R. BOOK 077 PAGE
971& PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA: •
thence. RUN EAST. 10004 FEET ON ,n.
THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF MAR- .
IIS ROAD TOA POINT:.
amore. CONTINUE FAST ALONG SAID .
FEET
▪ TTOME O� OF 610.11
• thence. CONTPAIH ALONGID
POINT
RIGHT-OF-WAY. 19130 FEET TO A
FOOTT
FFLORIDA EAST COAST
RAILROAD RIGHT-OF•WAYY: E. �7
AWI.ONNd ce � FLORIDA FAST COST
RAILROAD RIGHT-OF•WAY TO THE IN-
TERSECTION YL 4TH
• 1"
• 0 KNOYM AS HARRIS ROAD;
REBTCekONG RUN 9140.0004 I RWd0ITT.0F
WAY La$
TO T• H. Run N 00.47111' BEGINNING. B. 00001089
TOT HE POINT OFBE60B.NO.
OR 00.LAND 281 AC S.A0aNO 7$330.»B.P.
A public hearing 81 which prase In altered
ahs .old Mea have Comlb ��
hard. er 0? held 8 0w a
Comird an a (edam Rha tw Ronda m the
Won Building
Chambers a� .1. V O
Beach B ends. 00 Ta d y, temeN Yrs'
Beset, Flmka, on Tuesday, Itewarnba 72.1(180
Anyarhe who whh b.ppea aw doltish
watchmay 0 meds al000 dof the wen need to
maws that a h Includes
record of the proaadage
N madewhichMcbbn0oaawale5lgh and svl
dense INDIAN
RIVER
I.bVirl be bared.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMESIONERS
Brs•Oon C.. ScW1Oo4..k.
Payamber 1.1We•
BOOK 75 FI{CE' 25
wit:!
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/9/88:
TO:
William G. Collins II
Ac.ting_ ountyA-dministrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Rea inglv
CP
Community Dev lopt Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Chief, Current Development
FROM: John W. McCoy, Staff Planne _. �M
DATE: November 9, 1988
SUBJECT: VERO STOR-ALL'S REQUEST FOR THE ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION
OF 4TH PLACE
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of November 22, 1988.-
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Darrell McQueen has submitted a petition for right-of-way abandon-
ment on behalf of Vero Beach Stor-All for a portion of 4th Place.
That segment proposed for abandonment extends from the FEC rail-
road right-of-way westerly for a distance of approximately 230'.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
Per guidelines established by the Board of County Commissioners,
the petition was reviewed by all County divisions and utility
providers having jurisdiction within the right-of-way. All
reviewing agencies have recommended approval of the abandonment,
with the provision that a 20' wide utilities and drainage easement
be retained. This portion of 4th Place is not part of the roadway
system as noted on the County Thoroughfare Plan, and is not needed
for the thoroughfare system. The right-of-way currently deadends
at the FEC railroad tracks. The petitioner will use the property
to expand the existing business, if the abandonment is approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the County abandon its rights to the portion
of 4th Place right-of-way described in Exhibit A, and that the
Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners be authorized to
execute the attached resolution (Attachment #3), with the condi-
tion:
1. That a 20' drainage and utilities easement be reserved along
the north side of the subject right-of-way as described in
Exhibit B of the Resolution.
NOV 2 21988
14 BOOK 75 F'".Lr. 2 6
The Chairman opened the.. Public Hearing, and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed
the Public Hearing.
NOV 2 2 1988
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner WheeFer, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 88-122, providing for the closing,
abandonment and vacation of a 230' portion of Harris
Road running west from the west right-of-way of the FEC
Railroad.
15 BOOK 75 PAGE 227
RESOLUTION NO. 88 - 122
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING,
ABANDONMENT AND VACATION OF .A 230' PORTION OF HARRIS..
ROAD RUNNING WEST FROM THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE FEC
RAILROAD, SAID LANDS LYING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY.
WHEREAS, on April 27, 1988, the County received a duly
executed and documented petition from Darrell McQueen requesting
the County to close, vacate, abandon and disclaim any right, title
and interest of the County and the public in and to all that 230'
portion of Harris Road running west from the west right-of-way
line of the FEC railroad, said lands lying and being in Indian
River County.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Florida Statutes §336.10, notice
of a public hearing to consider said ...petition has been duly
published; and
WHEREAS, after consideration of the petition, supporting
documents, staff. -investigation and report, and testimony of all
those interested and present, the Board finds that said
right-of-way is not a state or federal highway, nor located within
any municipality, nor is said right-of-way necessary for
continuity of the County's street and thoroughfare network, nor
access to any given private property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
1. All right, title and interest of the County and the public in
and to that certain right-of-way being known more particularly
described as:
See Exhibit A (attached)
is hereby forever closed, abandoned, vacated, surrendered,
discontinued, remissed and released, with the exception that a 20'
easement be retained as a drainage and utilities easement, and
this easement is reserved in perpetuity unto the County and the
Public and shall not be deemed to have been closed or abandoned in
any way by this resolution.
2. Notice of the adoption of this resolution shall be forthwith
published once within thirty (30) days from the date of adoption
hereof; and
3. The Clerk is ;hereby directed to record this resolution
together with the proofs of publication required by Florida
Statues §336.10 in the Official Record Books of Indian River
County without undue delay.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Eggert who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Wheeler , and upon being put to a vote; the vote
was as follows:
Chairman Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Vice -Chairman Gary C. Wheeler
Commissioner Richard N. Bird
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman
The Chairman thereupon declared
and adopted this und day of
NOV 22 1988
L
Nnvemher
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
the resolution duly passed
, 1988.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLOR DA
BY:
Don Scur o , Jr., '...rman
Board of County Commi si.ners
16 BOOK 75 H.GE228
L_LUY U t.)c HSaULIA f L5. INU.
ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
REPORTS
DESIGNS
SUPERVISION
APPRAISALS
CONSULTATIONS
April 5, 1988
Job # 84-378
Exhibit "A"
LIMITS OF ABANDONMENT
From the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 33 South,
Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida, run South on
the quarter section line a distance 'of 444.34 feet to an
intersection with the East right-ofway of the Old Dixie
Highway;
thence, run S 21° 47' 00" E on said right-of-way, a dis-
tance of 562.58 feet to an intersection with the
North right-of-way of Harris Road and the Southwest
corner of that -land conveyed to Gulfstream Lumber
Co. as described in Special Warranty Deed filed in
O.R. Book 577, Page 2718, Public Records of Indian
River County, Florida;
run East, 456.04 feet on the North right-of-
way of Harris Road to a point;
continue East along said right-of-way a distance
of 510.14 feet to the Point of Beginning;
continue along said right-of-way, 191.68 feet to
a point on the West line of 100 foot wide
Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way;
thence, run S 27° 53' 12" E, 67.36 feet along said Florida
East Coast Railroad right-of-way to the intersec-
tion with the South right -of -way -line of 4th Place,
also known as Harris Road;
thence, run N 89° 30' 31" W, 224.01 feet along said South
right-of-way line;
thence, run N 00° 47' 39" E, 60.00 feet to the Point of.
Beginning.
Said land containing 12,388.78 S.F. or 0.284 acres.
PREPARED BY LLOYD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
VERO BEACH
ROBERT F. LLOYD
REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER 3536
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 944
M
13 0 51
1835
VERO
5624112
2OTN STREET
BEACH. FLORIDA
32960
thence,
thence,
thence,
NOV 2 2 1988
17
BOOK 75 F.4 i,F. 229
EXHIBIT "B"
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
•
Commence at the intersection of the North right -ow -way line
of 4th Street and the West right-of-way of the Florida East Coast
Railway and run
N 27 53'12" W along the West right-of-way of the said
Florida East Coast Railway a distance of 262.83 feet to a POINT
OF BEGINNING. Then Run
Still along the said right-of-way N 27 53'12" W a distance
of 67.12 feet to a point. Then run
N 89 17'17" W a distance of 246.68 feet to a point. Then
run
run
S 0 47'39" W a distance of 20 feet to a point. Then run
S 89 17'17" E a distance of 278.89 feet to a point. Then
S 27 53'12" E a distance of 44.49 feet to a point. Then run
S 89 30'31" E a distance of 34.09 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Being part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 33
South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida.
Date 249457c,"/96#
Prepared by
Charles A. Cramer, P.L.S.
County Surveyor
PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST FROM GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH FOR SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE APPROVAL
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to wit:
18
NOV 2 2 1988
ETOK 75 FAU 230
9.•
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL •
Published Dally
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach In Indian River County, Florida; that the attached -copy of advertisement, being
'nask_1 _
in the matter of LUa7l.Otr G.- I Ja-t 9.,1.in1i (a 1
In the _ �p �Court, was pub-
lished In said newspaper in the issues of \Ot )P fra/tR_
Alf iant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published In said Indian River County, Florida, each dailyand has been
entered as second class mall matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun•
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication In the said newspaper.
r� �n
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _�� d=,��f A D. 19 VA
(SEAL)
(Businedlt na er)
Notary Public, stub of Fforlde ."\
MycCommission Expires June 29, 199
Bwdad 1Mu Trey rah. . Wm...,
s—.. - ..
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
it Nolte of publical hearing to coto,ra0 e f
grant -
ling
WWowhlpTThe exception
approvalora98nyb presantgr
owned by Grace Lutheran- Church of Vero
Beach, Florida, Inro., and Is located at 1150 0111
TheIsdescrlbedee:
THE WEST le OF THE NORTH 10
CEAST 14 TRACT
SETIONF10 TOWNSHIP 33 90UTtfgf
RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO
LAST GENERAL PLAT OF LANDS OF
INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF 8T. LUCIE
COUNTY, FLORIDA. IN PLAT BOOK 2,
PAGE 25• SAID LAND LYING AND
BEING - IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
SFLORIDA; LESS AND OUTH 1.5 ACRES THEREOF. ,THE
A nubile hearing at which parties in interest
and citizens eha0 have an opaortunity to be
heardCom-
missioners of Indiawill be held nyRiver Countftmd y, Florida In the
County Commission Chambers of the
AdminIahadon Building, Located at 1840Cergi
Sheet, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday. Novem-
ber 22, 1988 at 9:05 a.m.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any ant decision
which may be made at this meeting wi8 need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings.
Is made which Includes the testimony and evi-
dance upon which the 011008) wtil be based.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -•
By -s -Don 0. Bouddpk. Jr. }
chairman
November1.1888
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/14/88:
TO:
William G. Collins II, Acting County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Reatilhg,
Community Devel pmen7 Director
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP
Chief, Current Development
DATE:
November 14, 1988
SUBJECT: GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH'S REQUEST FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION
USE APPROVAL
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of November 22, 1988.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND LOCATION:
Peterson & Votapka, Inc., on behalf of the Grace Lutheran Church,
has submitted an application for special exception use and major
site plan approval to construct a church on a site zoned RS -6.
Churches are classified as special exception uses in the RS -6
district; thus, the submitted application must be reviewed under
the special exception process. The subject site is located at the•
southeast corner of 12th Street and 41st Avenue.
NOV 2 2 1908
19
BOOK
7 231
Special: exception uses are those types of uses that would not
generally be appropriate throughout a particular zoning district.
However, when special exception uses are carefully controlled as
to number, area, location, and/or relationship to the vicinity,
such uses would not adversely impact the public health, safety,
comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, and general welfare
and, as such, would be compatible with permitted uses within the
particular zoning district. Special exceptions require submittal
of an approvable site plan meeting all site plan criteria, zoning
district criteria and the criteria set forth in the regulations
for the specific land uses. In considering the request it is the
responsibility of the Board of County Commissioners, based _upon
the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission and
staff, to approve, approve with condition, or deny the request.
At its regular meeting of October 27, 1988, the Planning and
Zoning Commission conditionally approved the site plan and
recommended that- the Board of County Commissioners grant special
exception use approval for the church. The site plan approval
condition related to the establishment of a conservation easement
over upland areas on the site that are to be preserved.
SITE PLAN/PROPOSED USE
ANALYSIS:
1. Size of Site: ±3.27 acres --
2. Zoning Classification: RS -6, Single Family Residential (up
to 6 units/acre).
3. Land Use Designation: LD -2, Low Density Residential 2 (up to
6 units/acre).
4. Building Area: Primary Phase: 9,450 sq. ft.
Planned Future Addition: 3,120 sq. ft.
Future Total: 12,570 sq. ft. or
8.82% of the site
5. Total Impervious Area: (primary phase and future addition)
27,350 sq. ft. or 19.2% of the site
6. Open Space Required: 40%
Provided: 62.74% (excluding grassed parking
areas)
7. Off -Street Parking Required: 76 spaces
Provided: Paved: 4 spaces
Grassed: 106 spaces
Total Provided: 110 spaces
8. Stormwater Management: The stormwater management plan has
been approved by the public works department, and a Type "A"
stormwater permit has been issued.
9. Utilities: Although the applicant requested to tap into the
existing City of Vero Beach water main located across 12th
Street from the site, permission was denied. Thus, public
water service is not available -to the site.
The Environmental Health Department has approved plans for an
individual well and septic tank to service the proposed
church.
20
NOV 22 '98
BOOK 75 m[232 2
10. Traffic Circulation: The plan calls for the removal of an
existing dirt driveway that connects the site to 12th Street;
this driveway serviced a residence previously located on the
site of which only a foundation currently remains. The site
will be accessed via a two-way drive onto 41st Avenue.
11. Dedications and Improvements: A sidewalk is to be provided
along the site's entire 41st Avenue frontage.
12. Landscape Plan: The landscape plan exceeds the requirements
of Ordinance #84-47. Preservation of existing stands of
saw -palmetto and trees along most of the site boundaries will
more than adequately meet the requirement for Type "B"
buffering of adjacent properties.
13. Environmental Issues: A ±0.54 acre non-viable, isolated
wetland is located in the center of the site (see attachment
#4). The applicant has submitted copies of letters from the
DER, DNR, and the Army Corps of Engineers (A.C.O.E.) which
exempt the applicant from any dredge and fill or other
wetlands requirements.
Although these jurisdictional agencies have exempted the
project from wetlands -related requirements, the County's
wetlands requirements still apply. Pursuant to section
23.3(f)(1) of the site planordinance and County policy,
sites containing non-viable wetlands may be developed as long
as one of three available --options is pursued. These options
are prioritized as follows:
a. Preservation of the wetland area;
b. Mitigation for developing the wetland area, type -for -
type (wetlands for wetlands); or
c. Mitigation for developing the wetland area, type-for-
nontype (uplands for wetlands).
In determining which option should be approved, the County
considers the feasibility of development, the quality of the
wetland area(s), the potential for mitigation, and other
environmental opportunities on site. The applicant has
stated that it is not feasible to preserve the wetland area
and fill/build around it because it is located in the center
of the site; thus preservation would render the site
unbuildable for, the proposed use. Also, .the applicant has
stated that attempts to mitigate filling of the wetlands by
creating other wetlands on the site would destroy quality
pine and hardwood uplands areas on the site. In essence, the
applicant maintains that the cost (development feasibility
and loss of quality uplands areas) of preserving or creating
wetlands on site does not justify the potental benefits.
The applicant proposes option #3, "trading -off" a non-viable
wetlands area for total preservation of uplands areas as well
as planting wax myrtles around retention areas to mitigate
the loss of flora in the existing wetlands area. The appli-
cant's mitigation plan is summarized as follows:
21
NOV 22 1988
ROOK 75 FnE 233
a. Fill-in a ±0.54 acre non-viable wetland.
b. Preserve (no damage by filling) a ±1.18 acre upland area
that exists around the perimeter of the property (in-
cludes oaks, pines, saw -palmetto, wax myrtle, standing
dead pines) .
c. Plant wax myrtles.(not included in any landscape cred-
its) around retention• areas to mitigate loss of flora in
the wetlands area.
Planning staff agrees with tli applicant's reasoning that the
uplands for wetlands trade-off is acceptable in this case due
to the location of the wetlands on the site, the low func-
tional quality of the wetlands, and the opportunity for
preservation of quality uplands areas on site.
To ensure preservation of the uplands area, the developer
has been required by the Planning and Zoning Commission to
establish a conservation easement, acceptable to the County
Attorney's office, prior to issuance of a C.O. Furthermore,
the Planning and Zoning Commission has approved the proposed
mitigation plan as part of the site plan approval.
14. Special Exception Criteria: The following special exception
criteria are applicable:
1. No building or structure shall be located closer than
thirty (30) feet to any property line abutting a res-
idential use or district.
2. Access shall be from a major thoroughfare or as other-
wise approved by the County engineer.
3. Any accessory residential use or school upon the prem-
ises shall provide such additional lot area as required
for such use by this section and shall further be
subject to all conditions set forth by the reviewing
body. Accessory residential uses may include convents,
monasteries, rectories or parsonages.
4. Type "B" screening, as defined in Section 23.3(g)(3)
shall be provided along all property boundaries when the
facility is located within or adjacent to a residential
district.
The applicant satisfies all applicable special exception
criteria requirements.
15. Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning:
North: Single -Family Residential/RS-6
South: Vacant/RS-6
East: Single -Family Residential/RS-6
West: Single -Family Residential/RS-6
22 Noor. 75 `' Gi 234
NOV 22 19(38
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commission grant special
exception approval for the Church, making effective- the
conditional site plan approval previously granted by the Planning
and Zoning Commission:
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing, and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed
the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED BY
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously granted
special exception approval for Grace Lutheran Church,
making effective the conditional site plan approval
previously granted by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SEARCH
Chairman Scurlock reported that he had reviewed all 80
resumes that were submitted to Mercer -Slavin and had come up with
what he feels are the 5 best candidates. In addition to McDowell
and Smith from Mercer-Slavin's original short list, he had
selected Crew,:McCown and Dawson.
Commissioner Wheeler advised that he has 6 selections:
Chandler, Smith and Furtwangler from the original list, plus
Shannon, Horn and McCutcheon.
Commissioner Eggert's selections were Chandler, Furtwangler,
and Smith from the original list, plus Crew, O'Dell and Hunter.
Commissioner Bird had 3 selections from the original list:
Furtwangler, McDowell and Smith.
Commissioner Bowman advised that after reading all of the 80
resumes, she had not selected any from the original short list.
Her choices are Dawson, McCown and Crew.
NOV 221988
23 t1001( Th PACE 2:35
After a tally of the selections, the Board eliminated those
who had received only one vote: Shannon, McCutcheon, Horn, and
O'Dell. The Board agreed to pay the travel expenses for the 7
remaining applicants to come to Vero Beach and to hold one-on-one
interviews with each:
Carey F. Smith of Hilton•Head Island, South Carolina
Danny Crew of Pompano Beach, Florida
William Furtwangler of Charleston, South Carolina
Craig A. McDowell of Corpus Christi, Texas
James E. Chandler of Hollywood, Florida
Andrew McCown of Englewood, Colorado
Dennis Dawson of Grapevine, Texas
The Board felt it would be best to begin the interviews on a
Friday and finish up on a Monday, which would give the applicants
the opportunity to look over the community on Saturday and
Sunday. The Board directed staff to set up the appointments as
quickly as possible.
CLOSING OF PERSONNEL OFFICE DURING LUNCH HOUR
The Board reviewed the following memos dated 11/10/88:
To: William Collins -Acting Administrator
Date: 11 -10 -88 --
From: ,Zf/ack Price -Personnel Director Sub: Lunch Hour
The Personnel Department traditionally has been open during the
lunch hour. This practice prevents us from being as efficient as
is desirable. The aim to be available to clients is foremost in
our thinking since we are totally a service department. Our
clients however are predominantly County employees. We serve
them during normal working hours more effectively if we take the
lunch hour off together and come back at full force at 1:OOPM. No
employees require our assistance during the lunch hour.
Listed below are other considerations:
1. Personnel is a 4 person office. We are not completely cross
trained and during the noon hour would simply take messages for
others to follow up later.
2. If one employee remains on duty during the lunch hour the
department is then understaffed by 25% from 1:OOPM till 2:OOPM.
This interferes with the normal work of the others during that
period. Offset working hours are not practical for Personnel.
24
NOV 2 2 1988
BOOK 75
3. Job applicants from the public have access to the receptionist
who currently greets visitors and accepts applications.
Considering the volume of backlogged tasks Personnel already
faces plus a genuine desire to move the department forward in
several areas, approval of our closing during the noon hour would
be appreciated.
It was pointed out that the Clerk's Office has received
complaints about closing during the noon hour, but Administrator
Collins explained that the Personnel Dept. mainly serves the
employees while the Clerk's Office mainly serves the general
public.
Commissioner Bowman assumed that notice of this closing
would be sent to all County employees, and Commissioner Eggert
suggesting putting a notice on the Personnel Dept. door that the
office is closed during lunch hour.
Purchasing Director Jack Price advised that new applicants
coming in during the lunch hour could pick up or drop off appli-
cations at the receptionist desk in the main lobby.
Commissioner Bird felt we should try it out, and Adminis-
trator Collins was sure that if there are any difficulties, the
employees will let their supervisors know. That feedback will
tell us whether or not it is a good experiment.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board approved the
closing of the Personnel Dept. during the noon
hour.
GOLDEN SANDS PARK PROJECT - CHANGE ORDER #1 - DENNIS L. SMITH
CONSTRUCTION
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/14188:
NOV 2 2 198
25 PAH 2:37
TO: William G. Collins II
Acting County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
FROM: James D. White, P.E.
Capital Project Manage
SUBJECT:
�J fr
Change Order No. 1,..Dennis L. Smith Construction
Golden Sands Park Project
DATE: November 14, 1988
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The design of Golden Sands Park was modified slightly by staff to
eliminate clearing of -a area of about 0.5 acres which would have
been cleared and excavated as a 'stormwater retention area. The
goal of the change was toavoid' clearing 0.5 acres of dune
hammock vegetation. The financial result of the proposal change
order is a cost reduction of $2522.60 for the contract.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The alternatives are as follows:
Alternative No. 1
Authorize the chairman to execute the Change Order as prepared.
Alternative No. 2
Reject the Change Order and direct staff to renegotiate terms.
This choice might lead to a claim by the Contract.
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING
The staff recommends that Alternative No. 1 be approved. The
result of this Change Order is a savings of $2,522.60 on the
contract, by Indian River County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order #1 on the Golden Sands Park Project,
as recommended by Director Davis.
Director Davis reported that the County received a DOT
permit the other day regarding a southbound left turn lane into
the Golden Sands Park and also a northbound deceleration right
turn lane into the park. However, when the DOT returned the
permit they requested some additional work which would inflate
the construction cost by approximately $46,000, which would put
26
FOOK. 75 ['ASE 23
the total for the AIA work at $98,000. He contacted the DOT and
told them we did not have that much work programmed, and they
indicated they would consent to deleting the southbound left turn
lane coming into the park, which would serve people coming from
Brevard County and the areasnorth of Golden Sands. Director
Davis advised that by deleting the southbound left turn lane at
this time and plugging it into Phase 11 of the park, we could
reduce the budget significantly:
Chairman Scurlock asked what the County would require a
private developer to do in a similar case, and Director Davis
said that if we applied the same requirements to ourselves, the
left -turn lane would not be required until Phase 11.
Commissioner Bird asked if it would cost more to do it in
Phase 11 than it would to do it now, and Director Davis said that
road costs have stabilized in the last few years.
The Board indicated they would prefer to wait until Phase 11
to construct the southbound left turn lane into Golden Sands
Park.
27
L NOV 22198
BOOK 75 PAU.239
CHANGE
ORDER
AIA DOCUMENT 6701
1)istnbutu,n to:
OWNER
ARCHITECT
CONTRACTOR
HEW
U111TR
0
0
PROTECT: Golden Sands Park CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 -Division V
(name. address) Indian River County
Off SR A -1-A
TO (Contractor):
' Dennis L. Smith, INC
P.O. Box 2945
Vero Beach, Fl. 32961
INITIATION DATE: 10-24-88
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:
CONTRACT FOR:
CONTRACT DATE:
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Add asphalt pavement for additional turn lane at SR A1A
Delete stormwater management tract
Add storinwater management berm and - flume
Add earthwork to cover plhcement of fill
N'• Additional construction stakeout- -
Delete 5.6% of clearing and grubbing of stormwater management
tract
indan River Ct
Approved
gi5 Date
Admin.
666C
//-46
Legal
4-C.
!((6
Budget
//'f �-'(a‘
De p t'j? kr
)b
Tilsit Mgr.
•
Total
4735-04
$ 877.40
(-8800.00)
2450.00
4000.00
900.00
(-1950.00)
$V-2522.60)
Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect.
Signature of the Contractor Indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Tim,.
The original (Contract Sum) (GAG/r/rjteeidA(aifcyh)tljiT' z9S$ was % $
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $
The (Contract Sum) (CgLd6rMithid/ljAAInftyltf gc/sp) prior to this Change Order was $
The (Contract Sum) (titie%aAteli jr"(ly7Sy/ryfICAO/will be/ip9er faftl/ (decreased, (yh�F�la/1�e�df s
by this Change Order
The new (Contract Sum) (f 1rht,'ef1/Ilj'aitithieft flbtt) including this Change Order will be , . , S
The Contract Time will beifilM1sfr fayt9tl/ foe frit ft (unchanged) by
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
_BobPrt ,FSC Pelham
/ T T Phil1iDs Blvd
lan
gdo, Fi. 32819
BY ea/
0A11
Dennis L. Smith, Inc
CONTRACTOR
P � .,
Address
V- : reac'
ter -A=4—
//81 OAR /p -6.g3:
AI/1 DOCU INT G7•1 • Fe ANL( I,KUt ( • ANkII 147M 11)11un4 • AIA•I • pI'p
VMti AMtRICAN INSIIIUIt OF AF(CHIIECIS, 17.0 MW 1t.KA A 1.. N N , W ASHIhl.ltlh, tl.t :ijl.,
28
NOY2y, 1988
155,505.70
0
155,505.70
(2,.522:60
152,983.10
( 0
) Days.
Authorized:
Indian River County
0118418 25th Street
Address
Vero Beach, F1. 3296
BY
on . S ur
UAV[ /%—��
BOOK 75 FADE. 240
GIFFORD AREA SEWER PROJECT -.CONTRACT #1 - WASTEWATER TREATMENT
PLANT - RELEASE OF FUNDS
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/14/88:
DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 1988
TO: WILLIAM G. COLLINS, II
ACTING COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
FROM: ERNESTINE W. WILLIAMS
MANAGER OF PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
SUBJECT: GIFFORD AREA SEWER PROJECT - IRC PROJECT NO. US -85 -09 -DC
CONTRACT #1 - 1.0 MGD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
RELEASE OF FUNDS
BACKGROUND
On October 1, 1987, Indian„River County contracted for the
construction of the 1.0 MGD secondary - wastewater treatment plant
with tertiary filter, chlorine contact tank, effluent pump chamber,
non -spec effluent storage, and percolation basin, office building,
mechanical building, paved access road and parking area, all piping
and electrical, and other general site work.
The work covered under Contract #1 is now substantially complete.
Still remaining is the removal of a berm in the percolation area and
some final grading which represents $11,638.55 of work. There is
also a reduction for sales tax for services which did not have to be
paid and which amounts to $16,558.85.
ANALYSIS:
We have reviewed the figures and find them to be in order. It is
necessary to pay this final payment and release some of the
retainage for the Partial Pay Estimate which is attached.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that
payment for substantial completion be made to the contractor,
releasing funds for the project for all work under Contract #1,
excluding $11,638.55 to be retained until the berm and final grading
are completed. (This portion of the project cannot be completed
until the final effluent line is completed which is under a separate
contract.) Also, deduct $16,558.85 for sales tax on services which
did not have to be paid. All of the above is indicated on the
attached pay request.
EWW:h
Attachments
AMOUNT RETAINED FOR BERM & GRADING: $ 11,638.55
SALES TAX FOR SERVICES: 16,558.85
PREVIOUS PAYMENTS: 1,698.772.45
$ 1,726.969.85
AMOUNT DUE CONTRACTOR: 90,030.15
CONTRACT TOTAL: $ 1,817,000.00
N O V 2 2 1988
66._______
9 BOOK 75 F.1GE:241
Chairman Scurlock emphasized that the County has $32 -million
worth of construction going on right now, in addition to the
other private development projects in the county, and he wanted
to be very sure that we get these "as builds" constructed.
Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained how the "as builds"
are monitored and controlled.
Commissioner Eggert asked if we are doing everything we can
in getting information out to the Gifford community as far as
what is available to them from FmHA, and Director Pinto felt that
everything possible has been done to properly inform the
community. He explained that the paper flow has slowed down
right now due to a change in administrative personnel at FmHA.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
the release of funds to Specialty Maintenance &
Construction, Inc., as set out in staff's
recommendation.
APPOINTMENT TO IRC HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/19/88:
TO: Board of County
Commissioners
Carolyn R. Eggert 0
DATE: November 19, 1988 FILE:
SUBJECT: Housing Authority
FROM: County Commissioner REFERENCES:
The term of Tim Bradley on the Board of the Indian River County
Housing Authority will expire in mid-December. The application
30
L NOV 22198
LlooK 75 Du 242
of Ms. Pearl Jackson has been sent to the Governor's office for
approval. She is highly recommended by both Godfrey Gipson and
Tim Bradley of the Board as qualified and conscientious. She
would be valuable in helping the Board continue its rapport with
a large part of its constituency.
Recommendation
The Board approve and the Chairman be authorized to sign letters
of recommendation of the appointment of Ms. Pearl Jackson to the
Indian River County Housing Authority Board. These letters
should be sent to Dale Patchett; Tim Deretany and the Governor's
Office, Appointments Director, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida
32399-0001 with copies of the application attached.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to sign letters of recommendation of the
appointment of Ms._Pearl Jackson to the IRC Housing
Authority Board, as recommended by Commissioner Eggert.
APPOINTMENTS TO THE TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 11/19/88:
TO: Board of County DATE: November 19, 1988 F
Commissioners
FROM:
SUBJECT: Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council
Carolyn K. EggertG
County Commissioner REFERENCES:
31
NOV 22 i988
BOOK 77 PAGE 243
Recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the
following appointments and the required information be sent to
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Member Alternate
Margaret C. Bowman
Carolyn K. Eggert
MUNICIPALITY
Member
Mayor of Vero Beach
(Kenneth Macht)
ALTERNATE MUNICIPALITY
Member
Indian -River Shores
(A. J. Todd)
Gary C. Wheeler
Richard N. Bird
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved
the above appointments to the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council.
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD (Vero Beach Community
Redevelopment Agency)
Commissioner Eggert recalled that when this appointment
first came up, she tried to get Commissioner Wheeler to serve on
this Board, but he declined because he felt his business was
within that community. She stressed that her desire to have
Commissioner Wheeler replace her on this committee is not due to
any lack of interest in this project, it's just that she does not
have the time. Since Commissioner Wheeler has found that his
business is not considered to be in this area, and since he has
an extreme interest in the new Courthouse being built in the
downtown area, she would like to have Commissioner Wheeler
replace her on this board.
32
N O V 2 21988
L
BOOK 75 PAGE. 244
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, that the Board appoint
Commissioner Wheeler as Commissioner Eggert's
replacement on the. Downtown Redevelopment Advisory
Board.
Under discussion, Chairman Scurlock expressed his concern
about this committee since during the recent joint workshop with
the City of Vero Beach he heard that some of the decisions that
the City's Planning & Zoning Board has traditionally made in the
past would be transferred over to this board. If that is the
case, he felt the dual office holding capacity comes into play.
Further, he had some very serious reservations about the Planning
& Zoning Board being put in the back room, because that board is
where the authority ought to be. He just felt uncomfortable
about replacing the P & Z Board with some other board, especially
when Councilman Winchester inferred that some other responsi-
bilities are going to be transferred also.
Commissioner Eggert said she would be totally uncomfortable
if the advisory board had the final decision, and would feel the
need to withdraw if that is the case.
Commissioner Bird suggested that we ask the City for further
information regarding the responsibilities of this new board.
Commissioner Egggert asked if we could appoint Commissioner
Wheeler now and then if he gets to that point on the agenda where
he finds out that this board would have the final decision on
planning, we can consider withdrawing our representation at that
time. She did not feel it was right for a County Commissioner
to sit on any kind of City board that makes a final decision.
She knew that was a concern of alt the Commissioners.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion
was voted on and carried unanimously.
33 BOOK (5 FIGE245
� NOV 2 2 1988
Administrator Collins confirmed that there is a question of
dual office holding capacity on this matter, and that he would
check on the responsibilities of this board and get back to
Commissioner Wheeler before the meeting that is scheduled for 3
o'clock this afternoon.
CANCELLATION OF BCC MEETING OF DECEMBER 27, 1988
Commissioner Eggert advised that she would be in Detroit on
the Tuesday between Christmas and New Year celebrating her
Mother's 84th birthday, and asked the Board's feeling about
cancelling that meeting.
It was the consensus of the Board to cancel the regular
meeting of December 27, 1988.._.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made,
seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:10 o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
NOV 22`388
34
BOOK 75 Pr} 246