Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6/20/1989Tuesday, June 20, 1989 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, June 20, 1989, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Gary C. Wheeler, Chairman; Carolyn K. Eggert, Vice Chairman; Richard N. Bird; and Margaret C. Bowman. Absent was Don C. Scurlock, Jr., who was attending a conference in California. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; and Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk. The Chairman called the meeting to order. Reverend David Mulford, Pastor of First Presbyterian Church, gave the invocation, and Administrator Chandler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Chairman Wheeler noted that Item 9-G-1 - Oil Recycling Grant Funds - needs to be transferred to the agenda for the Solid Waste Disposal District. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent) transferred Item 9-G-1 to today's agenda for the meeting of the Solid Waste Disposal District. ,�' -'I BOOT i i F�.,E 100 `JUN 2 01989 J JUN 2 01999 Chairman Wheeler requested the addition of the following two items: 1. As Item J on the Consent Agenda, the approval of the Service In Process Contract with HRS for FY 1989/90. 2. A discussion regarding a 5th Courtroom. Administrator Chandler requested the addition of a Resolution authorizing application for a Comp Plan amendment and rezoning within the Booker T. Washington Addition Subdivision. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert; SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), added and deleted the above items. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of 5/23/89 The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the Minutes of the. Regular Meeting of May 23, 1989. There were none. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 5/23/89, as written. B. Report e�ceived and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board: Traffic Violation Bureau - Special Trust Fund Month of May, 1989 -- $63,125.98 C. Report The Board reviewed the following report dated 6/14/89: 2 r � � DISMITXI III) 1 ' TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector SUBJECT: Occupational Licenses DATE: June 14, 1989 Pursuant to Indian River County Ordinance No. 86-59, please be informed that $3,356.76 was collected in occupational license taxes during the month" of May, representing the issuance of 163 licenses. +sry "�Zj Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Comnissioner Scurlock being absent), accepted the above report to be placed on file in the Office of. the Clerk to the Board. D. Appointment to the Transportation Planning Comnittee The Board reviewed the following letter dated 6113189: MAYOR Nen: affloRT VICE MAYOR GEOM P. BUNNat COUNCIL Wun W CLINK ROBERT N LOW LLE JOHN a WDON.LO TOWN MANAGER J05EM 4 DORM June 13, 1989 TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES 8001 NORTH A -1-A. INDIAN RIVER SHORES. FLORIDA 32963 (407)231-1771 JUN 1989 RECEft*M awm em my. 0OWNIONM Indian River County Commission 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Fla. 32960 - Dear Chairman; Please remove John Todd's name as the representative from Indian River Shores on the County Transportation Com- mittee. Effective March 15, 1989, see attached minutes, be he this committee.Thetd ThealternatewillnbelFritzrGierhart on • Sincerely, Virginia L. Gilbert Town Clerk JUN® *198 3 BOOK 7 1 1-�, f',10E U��qqL] �^• •��. � BOOK 77 FAGS 103- ON ®3 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), appointed W. W. Clark to replace A. J. Todd on the Transportation Planning Committee, and appointed Fritz Gierhar' as a voting alternate. E. Resignation from Tourist Development Council The Board reviewed the following letter dated 6/12/89: �Q1516117�8,9�, , Cn Jae '{ ry9 w Co doS�M�S�`� Mr. Gary Wheeler Chairman Tourism Dev t Council 1840 25th Street " Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Days Inn Vero Beach 8800 20th Street _ I-95 & Fla. 60 Vero Beach, Florida 32966 (407) 562-9991 June 12, 1989 Dear Mr. Wheeler, I.hereby tender my resignation as a member of the tourism council. I have accepted a position with another hotel out of state. - I appreciate the opportunity to have been a part the council. Very Truly Yo rs, s: James S. Davis ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), accepted the res.ignation of James S. Davis from the Tourist Development Council. i 4 F. Budget Amendment 082 - Tourist Tax The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/12/89: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 12, 1989 SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT 082 - TOURIST TAX CONSENT AGENDA FROM: Joseph A. Baird OMB Director DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In order to initially implement the Tourist Tax, a two year budget had to be developed outlining the proposed uses of this new source of revenue. This budget, which began April 1, 1987 and ended March 31, 1989, does not conincide with the county's fiscal year (October 1 to September 30). The Tourist Tax Committee did not wish to develop a budget for the last six months of fiscal 1989 until they had had an opportunity to evaluate the original two year budget. In their meeting of May 17, 1989, the committee proposed the following budget for the period April 1 - September 30, 1989. DISTRICT I City of Vero Beach Emergency Dune and Park Restoration South Beach Lifeguard Tower _ Re -deck Boardwalk at South Beach Beach Park Maintenance Arts Council Fourth of July Extravaganza Operating Expense Chamber of Commerce Operating Expense DISTRICT II $75,000 15,000 10,000 $55,500 $1551500 $ 5,000 7.500 $ 12,500 $ 7,500 $ 7.500 $175,500 There were no recommendations because District II's revenues had not met expectations. The committee decided to let the money accumulate, for use in the 1989/90 fiscal year budget. On May 22, 1989 the Board of County Commissioners approved the Tourist Tax committee report as outlined above. REION Staff recommends that the Board of County Tourist Tax committee's proposed uses of the last six months of the 1988/89 fiscal year, amendment appropriating these monies. Commissioners approve the Tourist Tax funds for the and the attached budget F J �•- JUN 2 0 1989 5 boor. .1 F,���t 1 C� 'JUN 2 1989 BOOK � 77 FAGE 105 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved staff's recommendation, as set out in the above memo, and Budget Amendment 082. TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Joseph A. Bair OMB Director SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT NUMBER: 082 DATE: June 20, 1989 Entry Number Funds/Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 1 REVENUE Tourist Tax/Vero Beac 119-000-312-011.00 S 175.500 S 0 EXPENSE 'Tourist Tax EXRensesIVero Beach 119-110-572-088.11 S 175,500 G. Surplus Property ` The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/8/89: DATE: June 8, 1989 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY CL14USSIONERS TM U: James E. Chandler, County Administrator H.T. "Sonny° Dean, Director Department of General,Se s FROM: Dominick L. Mascola, CPO Manager Division of Purchasing SIJBJ: SURPLUS PROPERTY The following vehicle has been declared surplus to the needs of Indian River County. 1967 Ford Water Truck Asset #1598 ID T85KUA444 a ANALYSIS: Staff recce vends the authority be granted by the Board of County Cammssioners to declare the above vehicle surplus and authorize its sale. RECQMMENDATION: This will be placed on the Surplus Property Sale open to the Public as per State Statutes. FUNDING: The monies received frau this sale will be returned to the General Fund. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0,, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), declared the above vehicle surplus property and authorized its sale, with monies received from this sale to be returned to the General Fund, as recommended by staff. H. Release of County Liens The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/9/89: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Lea R. Keller, County Attorney's Office DATE: June 9, 1989 RE: CONSENT AGENDA - BCC MEETING 6/20/89 RELEASE COUNTY LIENS I have prepared the following lien releases and request the Board authorize the Chairman to execute them: Lot 185 of COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH, in the name of REALCOR-VERO BEACH ASSOCIATES Lot 81s of COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH, In the name of REALCOR-VERO BEACH ASSOCIATES Lot 3, Block H of ROCK RIDGE SUB. REPLAT NO. 2 in the names of CHARLES E LOIS T. WARD LI'Lot 1, Block L of ROCK RIDGE SUB. NO. 3 In the names of JACQUELINE NEWMAN and THERESA S. KNIGHT 7 BOOK JUN 0 1189 SUN 2 0 199 �>� BOOK / � PAGE 10 d Lot 2, Block H of ROCK RIDGE SUB. REPLAT UNIT NO. '2 in the name of ROBERT H. and H. JANET LABER Lot 133 of COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH, in the name of REALCOR-VERO BEACH ASSOCIATES Lot 136 of COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH in the name of REALCOR-VERO BEACH ASSOCIATES Lot 5 of SEMINOLE SHORES SUBDIVISION, in the name of CAUSLAND 8 CALHOUN Lot 11 of ANGLERS COVE SUB. in the name of THOMAS STEINRUCK, JR Map #35 of State Road 60 Wastewater Reservation in the name of J. DALE SORENSEN and R. WILLIAM BECKER ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), authorized the Chairman to execute the Release of Liens listed in the above memo. COPIES OF SAID RELEASE OF LIENS ARE ON FILE IN THE.OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 1. Approval of Out -of -County Travel ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved out -of -county travel for Commissioner Wheeler to attend 1989 National Solid Waste Forum on Integrated Municipal Waste Management Seminar, July 17-19, 1989 at Lake Buena Vista, Florida. 8 J. Service in Process Contract with HRS for FY 1989/90 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/19/89: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 19, 1989 SUBJECT: SERVICE IN PROCESS CONTRACT WITH H.R.S FOR 1989/90 FY CONSENT AGENDA FROM: Joseph A. Baird OMB Director DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION Attached is a copy of the 1989/90 contract for Service in Process between the department of Health and Rehabilitative Services and Indian River County. The agreement is the standard annual contract which in the current year will mean $8,,000 in revenue from the state for the Sheriff performing the duties of "Service in Process". RECOMM1MATION , Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Service in Process contract for 1989/90 FY. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved the Service in Process Contract with HRS for FY 1989-90, as recommended by staff. COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 9 BOOK f'A.GE IOS ,JUN 2 0IJ89 JUN 2 0 1989 Bou 17 MAO REQUEST FOR RESOLUTION FOR LICENSURE OF FAMILY DAY CARE HOMES The Board reviewed the following letter dated 4/4/89: IUZQ Adrr,inistr Attorney ator Redlands Christian Migrant Assoc'�e#�,, h "'Forks IR 219 North First Street • Immokalee, Florida • 33934 • (813) 657-3362 ' ommunity Dev. �vfiilities�-=L� &567 8 Tinance � `910 Other '> APR 1980 ''' Apri 1 4, 4989 kirrq�GAry Wheeler, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida commis, d MMrSSM, fty /pN s :Re: Resolution for Licensure of Family Day Care Homes Dear Mr. Wheeler; Please direct your attention to the above referenced document. Our organization requests the Board's approval of this resolution which will enable us to serve the children of Indian River County. - Family Day Care Homes offer a viable alternative to child day care centers.We have contract -ed with the State of Florida Dept.of Health and Rehabilitative services for funding under Title XX. Unfortunately, We cannot use the funding for family day care homes unless the Board directs HRS to inspect the facility. Thank you very much for your attention in this matter. Sincerely, Linda Camardella Program Coordinator 4a1- 6 - X7 -38`4W Chairman Wheeler requested the deletion of this item since the representative who asked for this to be placed on today's Agenda is not here. Commissioner Eggert explained that she, asked Welfare Director Joyce Johnson to look into this 121% that they are required to get from private and local government as she wanted to make sure we have that information before this matter comes ,back to the Board: 10 t ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent) deleted the above item from today's Agenda. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE CHANGING THE STATUS OF THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICE The hour of 9:05 o'clock having passed, the Deputy Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to wit: VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River Codnty, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Bef orb the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach In Indian River County, Florida; that,the attached copy of advertisement, being In the court, was puo- ..;i.. ••'+}{.,'1 .;l.,iv:ar+ NOTiCEt ��g-tt..:!" rhe Board of GWWV c;;mmisalorien+'o111 pal er County: Florida, hereby proAdesn ,r apublic Hearing scheduled Mr 9:06 A T, esday. June 1989:10 dlscm a pr, wdlnnnfb All♦WBd:� ..t �:i�.-i. ♦:�;•i.,��7i. gqr��yyona who, MW wish to app lished in said newspaper in the issues of wldch may be made at thid met ensure to a verbatim record Ings is made, which included IF dens upon which the appeal: b May 30.1989: Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post officein Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.. Lz Sworn to and subscribed before this f A.D. 19 (Business Manager) (SEAL) Notory Public, State of Florida Ay Commisikm Expires June 29, 1989 3OWNd OM Tiriv Oft • bWAWW . Me. JUN 2 01999 11 BOOK `i r,, GEL 110 JUN 2 0 1999 BOOK J7 Administrative Aide Liz Forlani read aloud the title of the proposed ordinance. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing, and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the Public Hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent) adopted Ordinance 89-17, changing the status of the County Budget Office from one appointed by the Board of County Commissioners to one appointed and reporting directly to the County Administrator. 12 Ll 5/11/89.1(0rd)LE) ORDINANCE NO. 89- 1Z� AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE STATUS OF THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICE FROM ONE APPOINTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO ONE APPOINTED AND REPORTING DIRECTLY TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION IN CODE AND EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County that: SECTION 1. CHANGING OF STATUS OF COUNTY BUDGET OFFICE "Sec. 1-151. Creation of county budget office; designation of county budget officer," of the Code of Ordinances of Indian River County shall be amended to read as follows: "Sec. 1-151(a) Generally. Pursuant to the authority granted by Section 129.025(1), Florida Statutes, and any other conflicting ordinance to the contrary notwithstanding, the board of county commissioners designates a county budget officer to carry out the duties set forth in Chapter 129, Florida Statutes. (b) Hiring by county administrator bee rd- -o-4--covert-y comm+ss+eners. The county budget officer shall be hired by the county administrator bee and shall report directly to the county administrator Heard -o# eeunty-eemm+ss+eners. SECTION 2. REPEAL OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS OF BUDGET OFFICER Secs. 1-152 thru 1-155, which are reproduced below, are repealed: "Sec. 1-152. Duties.- In addition to the duties required by Chapter 129, Florida Statutes, the County Budget Officer shall be in charge of planning, organizing, directing, and controlling the accounting, financial, and budgeting work of the County. The County Budget Officer shall confer with and advise his subordinate employees concerning work problems and in the development and installation of work procedures and policies and shall analyze County fiscal policies and recommend changes or modifications in same. The County Budget Officer shall JUN 2 01999 CODING: New words shown as underlined and deleted words shown as t--nter+tneatedf 1 BOOK.j f Fr.; � BOOK 17 FACE 11% ORDINANCE NO. 89 - direct and supervise accounting and budgeting activities and procedures. The County Budget Officer shall train or assist in the training of County personnel' in fiscal duties and coordinate work flow. The County Budget Officer shall advise County officials and other department heads on accounting and budgetary policies, interpret accounting and fiscal policies, prepare budgets and financial statements, and/or assist In the preparation of reports and statements, and perform work in the operation of the overall fiscal process; and maintain the budget throughout the fiscal year. The County Budget Officer also shall perform related work as required including all bond issues and grant applications. Sec. 1-153. Knowledge, abilities, and skills. The County Budget Officer shall have knowledge of finance, budgetary, and fiscal management as they apply to government accounting, knowledge of the principles, methods, and practices of accounting, and knowledge of the laws and regulations governing fiscal operations of the County. The County Budget Officer shall possess the ability to advise -and implement modern accounting, budgetary, and fiscal procedures, the ability to plan, organize, and direct employees in the operation of financial procedures, the ability to prepare and present budgets, statements, and reports, and the ability to establish and maintain effective relationships with employees and the public. Sec. 1-154. Minimum qualifications. The County Budget Officer shall have been graduated from an accredited four-year college or university with a major in accounting or business administration or related field and shall have considerable experience in public or government accounting. A comparable amount of training and experience may be substituted for the minimum qualifications. CODING: New words shown as underlined and deleted words shown as tinter +meated M 2 _I ORDINANCE NO. 89- 17 Sec. 1-155. Review of administrative/ change. The Administrative Aide to the Board of County Commissioners shall schedule for the Board's agenda a review of this administrative change during January, 1989. The Board of County Commissioners may then review the functioning of this new administrative directive and may make any changes it so desires." SECTION 3. INCORPORATION IN CODE This ordinance shall be incorporated into the Code of Ordinances of Indian River County and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such purposes. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective upon receipt from the Secretary of the State of Florida of official acknowledgment that this ordinance has been filed with the Department of State. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 20th day of _ June # 1989. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal on the 30th day of May , 1989, for a public hearing to be held on the 20th day of _ June 1989, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Bowman seconded b Commissioner Bird y , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Absent Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest. By -G -C. Wheeler6 1A N Ki L' Chairman e y� V.$Qi1 a4 �� ,� • CODING: New words shown as underlined and deleted words shown as tnl:er++neel:ed ►JUN 2 0 k4tiq 3 BOOK - UN 2 ®1999 BOOK 77 WE 1�cJ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR COMP PLAN AMENDMENTAND REZONING WITHIN BOOKER T. WASHINGTON ADDITION SUBDIVISION TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A HEALTH DEPARTMENT FACILITY Administrator Chandler explained that this is a Resolution to authorize application to the City of Vero Beach for rezoning and a land use change for our Health Department site and some other properties that the County owns in that same area. At present there are a number of different zoning applications on that property, and we hope to bring it into conformity. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), adopted Resolution 89-61, authorizing application for Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning. RESOLUTION NO. 89- 61 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida owns certain lands in the Booker T. Washington Addition Subdivision; and WHEREAS, portions of those lands are zoned H (hospital and institutional), and portions of those lands are zoned 1171 (single family); and WHEREAS, portions of those lands are designated P (institutional), and portions are designated L (low density) on the Vero Beach Comprehensive Plan; and ' WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida wishes to have a consistent zoning and comprehensive plan designation on all the 1'6 property under its ownership within the Booker T. Washington Addition Subdivision so as to facilitate the development of a health department facility and such other office/administrative/institutional uses as may be appropriate and allowed within the H (hospital and Institutional) zoning district and P (institutional) planning designation, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida as follows: 1. The above recitals are ratified and affirmed. 2. The Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners is authorized to sign an application for rezoning and plan amendment on behalf of the County Commission. 3. The County Administrator, James E. Chandler, or his designee is authorized to sign the application for rezoning and plan amendment as Petitioner., and to take whatever steps are necessary to process such applications through the City of Vero Beach, Florida's rezoning and plan amendment process. The above resolution was offered by Commissioner Eggert and seconded by Commissioner Bird and, being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Ay..e Vice Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Absent The Chairman thereupon declared .the resolution duly pased and adopted this 20th day of June 1989. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY-3i&lz 4 - -- �l�Cv- 17 . C—afy Cee I er, ChaTrman J ®'989 Boor. / F�,,r1� STOCKADE/WORK PROGRAM PROPOSAL Boos 77 mAV The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/6/89: TO: James Chandler County Administrator FROM: Doug Wright, Director Emergency Management Services DATE: June 6, 1989 SUBJECT: STOCKADE/WORK PROGRAM PROPOSAL It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at the meeting scheduled for June 20, 1989. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In the memo prepared and dated April 13, 1989, cost estimates were provided to the Correctional Planning Committee as relate to the construction, operation, and staffing of two separate stockade type structures on property to be purchased adjacent to the current detention facility. Included in the proposal were funds for a structured work program to be implemented in the County. Staff visited the Polk County Detention Facility on May 18, .a 1989, which has a Stockade and Work Program which includes a `=�?- farm type operation to produce vegetables and other provisions for the inmate population. Until approximately six months ago, wdx.Polk.County operated a stockade program off site from the main detention facility. When the new detention facility was constructed, Polk County officials determined that the Work Release Program would be incorporated on site at the main facility. What Polk County has done is build a similar facility as Indian River County built in Phase II of the County Jail and the Work Program is operated out of this structure. Subsequent to the visit to the Polk County Detention Facility, staff met with Commission Chairman Gary Wheeler to convey information regarding the Stockade/Work Program. It was agreed and the Commission Chairman felt that a trial period for the work program would be beneficial to assess the benefits and determine if temporary or additional long term facilities should be constructed. It is felt that the work Program can be implemented at this time with current facilities by making available certain sections of Phase II of the Indian River County Jail for inmates assigned to the work release program. It is anticipated that 10-15 minimum custody inmates will be involved in the start-up with any increase in numbers occurring as is determined feasible. The Sheriff and his staff has indi- cated support for this proposal and will direct and operate the work release program. It is anticipated that funding in the amount of $135,200 would be required to implement the work release program. This includes the following: 18 STAFFING - Three (3) Correctional Officer positions assigned to the Work Program at an estimated $25,000 each which includes benefits for a total of approximately $$ 75,000 75,000. SUPPORT EQUIPMENT - Equipment to support the work release program is anticipated as follows: Vehicle (2 ton truck chasis) Security enclosure Tools - work equipment Medical kits Beverage & food containers Radios - Mobile & portables Uniforms & clothing INSURANCE COUNSELING/REHABILITATION THERAPY ESTIMATED ANNUAL GRAND TOTAL $25,000 6,000 2,500 300 1,000 4,400 5,000 $ 44,200 For fiscal year 1988-89, funding in the amount of $66,950 would be required to implement the program. The estimated budget for the period July 1, 1989 to September 30, 1989 is attached hereto. Funding in the amount of $68,250 would be required to continue the program for the nine month period in fiscal year 1989-90, which would be the time frame of October 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990. The estimated budget for the period indicated is also .:.:.attached hereto for reference. Indian River County should and will realize a monetary value from the proposed work Program. Twelve (12) inmates working eight (8) hours per day, five (5) days per week in the program will provide a total of 480 man hours per week at the minimum value of $5.00 per hour. The County should recognize a benefit of $2,400 per week or $124,800 per year. If the total net value for one year ($124,800) is subtracted from the total costs ($135,200) the net costs to the County is $10,400. This certainly provides the taxpayer some return on funds expended. The proposal is predicated on the timely and immediate approval of the Board of County Commissioners authorizing staff to proceed to request bids for construction of Phase III of the Indian River County Jail. Although the construction period will be in the range of eighteen months, the work release program will be reviewed in twelve months to determine if con- struction of the stockade facility is feasible and necessary. Close monitoring of the inmate population will continue in an effort to prevent further litigation with the Florida Department of Corrections. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The concept of this proposal is for an evaluation process of the Stockade/Work Program prior to the expenditure of funds for the physical structures alluded to in earlier documents. Phase II of the Indian River County Jail was intended and constructed for use in a Work Release Program. However, the facility had to be utilized to house inmates with classifica- tions higher than minimum in order to manage the inmate popu- lation when overpopulation exceeded approved levels established by the Department of Corrections. The change in use precluded the facility from being utilized for the intended purpose. 0 t 19 BOOK. 77 FADE IIS 6,000 10,000 $135,200 JUN 2 c 1939 F BOOK 17 PAGE If inmate population levels do not stabilize, there is the potential that some inmates may have to be housed in St. Lucie County. Information provided by Circuit Judge Charles E. Smith in his correspondence dated May 22, 1989, allude to over 200 beds being available in the St. Lucie County Detention Facility. It is also felt that additional county probation officers would benefit the County in assisting the Sheriff- in -- managing the inmate population. The intent of the Stockade Program is to house additional inmates that should be incarcerated rather than being released on the streets, often committing additional crimes to provide funds for a developed chemical dependency. The Stockade Program envisions counseling and rehabilitation therapy as tools to assist inmates with dependency on various chemicals while attempting to instill some degree of- work ethic in the individual. These programs would occur at night and on weekends for inmates identified with these problems. With the support of Sheriff Dobeck and his staff, ample space will be made available in Phase II of the County Jail for the Work Release pilot program to be initiated. A review of the program will occur in twelve months and a comprehensive recommendation after input from all parties will be made to the Board of County Commissioners at that time. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Correctional Planning Committee recommend to the Board of County Commissioners the following actions: 1. Authorize the staff to proceed immediately to request bids for the construction of Phase III of the Indian River County Jail; 2. Approve funding in the amount of $135,200 from General Fund Contingencies for the Sheriff to implement a Work Release Program as outlined above; and 3. Review the Work Program in twelve months to evaluate it and the potential for construction/expansion of current or additional facilities for minimum/medium custody inmates. This approach is the most feasible in order to determine the long range benefits anticipated and provide input as to how future funds may best be utilized to maximize effectiveness. The recommended funding will provide an environment wherein an inmate can avail himself of extra gain time, establish a work ethic, and receive counseling and therapy treatment to begin the process to rid himself/herself of chemical dependency if the desire to do so prevails. In any case, the Stockade/Work Release Program will remove some individuals from the streets and with the support of the County and Circuit Court Judges, it is anticipated that program results will reflect a positive impact beneficial to the community as a whole. 20 STOCKADE/WORK PROGRAM ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR PERIOD JULY 1, 1989 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Operating_ Costs Personnel 75,000 x 3 1/2 $18,750 Counseling/Rehabilitative Therapy 2,500 Insurance 1,500 Sub -total 22,750 Capite.A Support Equipment 44,200 Total 0 ESTIMATED COST (OCTOBER 1, '1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990) Staffing 56,250 (75,000 x .75)* - :.'Insurance ( 6,000 X .75 or 75�) ' 4,500 - counseling Rehabilitation Therapy (10,000 x 75) 7,500 Total $681250 d Commissioner Bird asked if the main objective in spending this $135,000 is to relieve the overcrowding at the Jail, but Chairman Wheeler advised that the opinion is that we need some sentencing alternatives for the Judges to try to correct some of these problems. Ultimately it might relieve the overcrowding, but the problem is that we are functioning as a state prison with the total costs being paid by the county. Commissioner Bird asked what benefits would be derived from this program, and Chairman Wheeler explained that it costs 21 JUN 2 1989 BOOK 17 Fro c'u BOOK 77 F,�IJE 121 approximately $20,000-$30,000 per bed to keep someone in jail for one year, and you are looking at $300,000-$400,000 a year to have them on the streets with all the crime that is committed. He believed we have a responsibility to the community to see that these people are in jail; unfortunately, they are not being put in jail all over the state because of overcrowding. Our long-range plans for the overcrowding problem is to build Phase Doug Wright, Director of Emergency Management Services, noted that we can show, even though it is soft money, that there is some benefit back to the taxpayers of this county to have 10-15 inmates working everyday on road projects. In addition there is the benefit of having them attend the drug treatment and counseling sessions in the evenings. The prisoners also would be gaining additional gain time. Commissioner Bird felt the key to the success of this program would be good organization and supervision. Chairman Wheeler confirmed that they will be very closely supervised. Further, they must be classified to get into this program. The trend in the programs we have looked at is that they have a waiting list of inmates who want to get into these programs because they get additional gain time for working. There is incentive. The participating inmates must be sentenced prisoners, not those just waiting for trial. Director Wright explained that this will not be a community service program where they work at their own pleasure and leisure. They will have a job to perform every day. Commissioner Bird asked how the three correction officers will be assigned, and Director Wright advised that one officer will be assigned to the classification of prisoners and prioritizing the assignments, and two officers will go out into the field to supervise the inmates. All three officers will be trained to perform all the functions. Three officers may be needed in the field if a sufficient number of inmates are 22 - M working, but there won't be any relief factors or any vacation factors built in if we have just two officers. Commissioner Eggert wondered if there are any law enforcement grants available for the drug education counseling and rehabilitation therapy. Director Wright advised that the Sheriff's Dept. has submitted documents for two federal grants, but one of the problems we have run into before is that this county is small, and the state and federal programs like to apply the funds to the larger programs. Hopefully, we will be successful this time in getting at least one of these grants. Commissioner Eggert just wanted to make sure that we have a good, solid established program, and didn't want to see the inmates "gain -time" their way through the program and leave three-quarters of the way through without getting the full benefit from the counseling and therapy programs. Commissioner Bird noted that the quality of work performed at the golf course by workers from the Correctional Institution Is in direct proportion to the quality of supervision they receive. Administrator Chandler agreed that we are looking for productivity. We think we can gain by this as they have in some other counties where they have these work programs, and we'd like to try it for 12 months and monitor it during that time. Commissioner Bird wanted to see it reviewed every quarter by the County Administrator. Commissioner Bowman felt that one of the goals here is to instill work motivation in these individuals. If we manage to keep just one man out of jail for the rest of his life, we have saved a great deal more than $135,000. Director Wright explained that these officers will be employed by the Sheriff and funded out of the general fund contingencies. Today's request is for approval of the $66,950 to 23 NOOK 17 Fav J 242 v t 1989 BOOK 77 F,Au l2 fund it for the balance of this fiscal year. The cost of next year's program will be brought to the Board at budget time. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously.(4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo. Bill Koolage, 815 26th Avenue, was highly in favor of this program, but wanted to see it go further and followed up with other measures that would be effective in curtailing crime, especially by young people. He urged the Board to put pressure on the state and the federal governments to expand their fight against crime and drugs and relieve the onus of punishment and imprisonment from county government. 24 FULL AND FINAL RELEASE ON ROOF REPLACEMENT FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/6/89: DATE: JUNE 5, 1989 TO: JAMES CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR THRU: H.T. 'SONNY' DEAN, DIRECTOR DEPARTM NT OF GENERAL SERV AES FROMQ N WILLIAMS, SUPT. ILDING AND GROUNDS SUBJECT: FULL AND FINAL RELEASE ADMINISTRATION ROOF REPLACEMENT BACKGROUND: At the March 7, 1989 Board of County Commission meeting, staff was directed to contact the Traveler's Insurance Company, representing the Koppers Company pursuant to the terms of a February 3, 1987 settlement agreement. In the February, 1987 settlement agreement, the County had reserved the right to require Koppers to replace damaged insulation which may be subsequently discovered as reroofing progressed. The Board approved a change order March 7, 1989 totalling $34,509.00 for damaged insulation (this was a not to ekceed estimate provided by Lucas Waterproofing), actual expenses were $27,309. The Traveler's has issued for the Boards approval , a full and final release in the amount of $40,186.58. This represents a pro -rated settlement for all remaining insulation on the Administration Building roof ($73,066.50 x 55% = $40,186.58). 'Based on $1.50 per sq. ft. (amount bid by Lucas for replacement) j�T-41"''k depreciated at 5% per year for nine(9) years of a twenty(20) year •...:' life. Copies of correspondence concerning amounts are attached. ANALYSIS: Acceptance of this release will relieve Koppers of all responsibility for damages caused by the failure of their roof membrane. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the full and final release as fowarded by Constitution State Service Company representing Koppers Company. LW/rae ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved the full and final release as forwarded by Constitution State Service Company representing Koppers Company, as recommended by staff. RELEASE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD JUN 2 0 M9 25 BooK 7,I E124 JUN 2 0 1989 BOOK 77 rAGL-12,51 REQUEST BY SUSAN O'DARE TO PURCHASE 15' X 81.13' COUNTY -OWNED PROPERTY The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/8/89: DATE: JUNE 8, 1989 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CHARLES VITUNA COUNTY ATTORNEY FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTO DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERV S SUBJECT: REQUEST TO PURCHASE 15' X 81.13' PARCEL COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY BACKGROUND: Ms. E. Susan O'Dare who resides at 1923 22nd Street, Vero Beach, has made a request to purchase a parcel of land located in Block 40. This is property that was acquired by the County for non-payment of taxes.. ANALYSIS: According to F.S.S. 125.35(2), if the County Commissioners find that the r value of the property is $5,000 or less, due to the size, shape, ..location, and value of the parcel, and it is of use only to one or more ,.adjacent property owners, the Board may effect a private sale of the }, parcel: We must send certified notice to all adjacent property owners of a private sale. Should two or more property owners notify us of a desire to purchase the property, we must accept sealed bids. RECOMMENDATIONS• The subject property has a value of less than $5,000 and Ms. O'Dare has made an official request to purchase the parcel. Staff request permission to notify Ms. O'Dare of the procedure and authorize us to proceed with the action necessary to make the property available for sale to her at a price set by the Board. Commissioner Bird felt the value of this property was certainly in excess of $100. Public Works Director Jim Davis pointed out that it is very difficult to establish a value for a very thin piece of property when the County, at the request of the City, is going to retain a water, sewer and drainage easement over the property. Putting 26 part of that property back on the tax rolls will generate some revenue for the County. He didn't have any problem in telling her that the County would like more than $100 for it, but the question is how much more should we ask for. If we go for an appraisal, it probably will cost more than what we will realize from the sale. Director Davis felt that if we go to her and offer her the property for $1,000, she would leave it just as it is since she is enjoying the use of it now anyway. He was not quite sure it. was much of a benefit for her to own it as she just wants to be able to park there legally. The City would not want her to build a garage there, however. Chairman Wheeler felt that if we have a piece of property that is of no use to the county, particularly a very narrow band of it like this, and particularly when we can maintain the easement, we should return it to the tax roll and at least get some return out of it. Administrator Chandler advised that we have a rough estimate of $800 on this property, but noted that today's request is just to initiate the procedure. Commissioner Bird agreed that the value would be somewhere in the $800 neighborhood. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo. QUN 2 0 1989 27 BOOK. "-1'7 t 12 rIp- JUN 1989 BOOK. BUDGET AMENDMENT 081 - GOLDEN SANDS PARK The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/13/89: ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director and } James D. White, County Enginee FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, C.E. . Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Budget Amendment for Golden Sands Park DATE: June 13, 1989 ----------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS At the Grand Opening of the Golden Sands Park in February 1989, there was some discussion as to how long it took to get over the dune walkover. County Engineering has made some additions to the origina-1 layout. Steps will be added for a more direct route to the shore, while still allowing for the ramp. RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING -¢^'- Staff recommends that these additions be approved and contract documents and specifications be prepared for competitive bidding procedures. Funds in the amount of $9,000.00 should be transferred from Account #001-199-581-099.21 General Fund to Account #310-143-572-066.51 Golden Sands Park Construction. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved Budget Amendment 081 and staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo. 28 TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Joseph A. Bair OMB Director (P. SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT NUMBER: 081 DATE: June 12, 1989 Entry Number Fun s De artment Acco nt Name Account Number 001-199-581-099.91 Increase _ - S 0 Decrease S 9.000.00 EXPENSE GENERAL FUND Reserve for contingencies Fund Transfers Out 00 -199-581-099.21 9,000,00 0 GOLDEN SANDS PARR REVENUE Fund Transfers In 310-000-381-020.00 9,000-00 S 0 EXPENSE Golden Sands Park Construction 310-143-572-066.51 9,000.0 0 OFFICE RENOVATIONS - COUNTY ENGINEERING The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/17189: ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: James D. White, P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Office Renovations County Engineering Division DATE: June 12, 1989 ---------------------- ------------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The Engineering Division has recently added staff to full authorized levels. The additional staff has resulted in cramped conditions and some separated functions. The construction inspection staff has been temporarily located at opposite ends of the office from their supervisor. This results in communication difficulty and lost productivity. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS The possible alternatives are as follows: Alternate #1 - Make minor renovations in the office to better utilize existing space and unify the construction inspection personnel and this will improve communications and productivity of those personnel at a cost estimated by the Building & Grounds ;aDepartment to be be $2,500.00. 29 JU N 2 01999 Boor. 77 r'.IJE12 JUN 2 01989 BOOK 77 Pq.Iu 129 Alternate #2 - Seek space in another part of the building., This would isolate construction inspection staff from the balance of the Engineering Division and reduce productivity and impair communication and control. Alternate space does not appear to be readily available in this building. Alternate #3 Do nothing, look to other means of compensating for separation of personnel. There is no immediate dollar cost to this alternate but lower productivity and control are considered undesirable. Cost of improving communications could exceed the cost of Alternate #1 and may not compensate for lowered productivity. RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING Staff recommends approval of Alternate #1 as the best solution. Funding is prepared by budget line transfer of $2,500.00 from 111-244-541-033.13 (Engineering Services) to 111-244-541-066.41 (Office Furnishings and Equipment) for this purpose. There is $5,000.00 in the former account that is not now expected to be needed for that purpose. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved staff's recommendation of Alternate #1 as set out in the above memo. FINAL PAYMENT FOR CHAIN LINK FENCE AT WASHINGTON PARK IN FFI I SMFRF The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/9/89: TO: James Chandler County Administrator THROUGH: James D. White, P.E. Acting County Enginee_" FROM: Michelle A. Gentilevr C e• Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Chain Link Fence at Washington Park - Fellsmere Final Payment DATE: ----------------------------------------------------------------- June 9, 1989 DDSCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The construction of the fence at Washington Park has been completed by Adron Fence Company as of June 1, 1989. This project has been accepted by the County Engineer. At this time, final payment of $4,309.76 is requested by the contractor., RECOMMENDATION It is staff's recommendation that the final payment in the amount , of $4,309.76 be paid in- full at this time. These monies are available from Account /004-108-572-066.39•. 30 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo. FINAL PAYMENT FOR SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/9/89: ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: James E. Chandler County Administrator U . THROUGH: James D. White, P.E County Engineer 4�a-lll FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Final Pay Request for Signal Construction for Miscellaneous Intersection Improvements Phase II DATE: June 9, 1989 --------------- ----------------------------------------- ------- DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The signal construction of the Miscellaneous Intersection Improvements Phase II has been completed by Signal Construction Company Inc. as of June 1, 1989. This project has been accepted by the County Engineer. At this time, final payment of $13,815.18 is requested by the contractor. RECOMMENDATION It is staff's recommendation that the final payment in the amount of $13,815.18 be paid in full at this time. These monies are available from Account #101-156-541-067.21. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo. 31 N 0 :1999 JUN P 0 1989 BOOK 77 PAGE 131 WASTE TIRE GRANT AND RECYCLING AND EDUCATION GRANT The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/14/89: DATE: JUNE 14, 1989 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTILI •Y �SE VICES FROM: RONALD R. BROOKS, MANAGER SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT SUBJECT: WASTE TIRE AND RECYCLING GRANT CONTRACTS BACKGROUND The County applied to the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) for a Waste Tire Grant and a Recycling and Education Grant. A Waste Tire Grant in the amount of $4,284 and a Recycling Grant.in the amount of $152,294 were approved by the DER and contracts for those grants have been received for signing by the County. ANALYSIS Attached are contracts for acceptance by the County of a Waste Tire Grant and a Recycling Grant. These contracts must be signed by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and returned to the -`DER by June 30, 1989. District staff recommends that the Board approve the subject grant contracts and authorize the Chairman to sign them. Commissioner Eggert didn't understand why this item wasn't transferred to the agenda for today's Solid Waste Disposal District the same as Item 9-G-1, Oil Recycling Grant Funds, and Administrator Chandler explained that those funds actually will go to the SWDD, but because of the nature of the recycling grant and the way it is offered by the State, we have to accept the funds through the County. 32 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved the contracts for the above two grants and authorized the Chairman's signature. COPIES OF CONTRACTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD GIFFORD AREA SEWER PROJECT - CONTRACT #4 - PINEVIEW PARK AND HIGH RIDGE MOBILE HOME PARK SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEMS The Board reviewed the following memo dated 6/12/89: DATE: JUNE 12, 1989 , TO: COUNTY E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTILIT VICES PREPARED AND STAFFED BY: ERNESTINE W. WILLIAMS �G{% MANAGER OF PROJECT ADMINISTRATION ' DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: GIFFORD AREA SEWER PROJECT . CONTRACT #4 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NOUS -87 -11 -CCS PINEVIEW PARK AND HIGH RIDGE MOBILE HOME PARK SEWAGE COLLECTION SYSTEMS BACKGROUND: On December 12, 1988, Indian River County contracted for the cleaning and televising of Pineview Park and High Ridge Mobile Home Park Sewage Collection Systems. The work covered under Contract #4 is complete. The original contract amount was $19,220.00. The revised final contract amount is $18,627.90, which represents a reduction of $592.10 as 1' shown in the attached Change Order No. 1 for Contract #4. V. .? ,4!� ANALYSIS: We have reviewed the figures and find them to be in order. It is necessary to pay this final payment and release the retainage as is requested in the attached Partial Pay Estimate No. 3. RECOMMENDATION: The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorizes the retainage be released and final payment in the amount of $4,064.20 be paid to the contractor, and that Change Order No. 1 for.a reduction in contract price of $592.10 be approved. ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE: $19,220.00'-. CONTRACT REDUCTION AMOUNT: $ 592.10 REVISED.CONTRACT PRICE: -----aaaaaaaaaaaaaa 18,627.90 aaaa=aaaaa UN 2 01989 33 800E 77 P,1,,E 13 I BooK 7 7 P,gGE 133' ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent), approved staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo. Form FmHA 424-7 .(Rev. 6-11-80) UNI ILI)SIAILSUC.1'AKIME141 U1• AUK1l.ULlUK! FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION FRDER No. 1. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER - Farmers Home Administration I DATE 5/1/89 ' ' STATE Florida CONTRACT FOR COUNTY Gifford Sewer Project Contract H4 OWNER Indian River County Board of County Commissioners To ..... Altair Maintenance Services, Inc_ ------ ....___...._....�.�....r... (Contractor) You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes DECREASE INCREASE (Supplemental Plans and Specifications Attached) in Contract Price in Contract Price $ $ See Attached Item Numbers 4,5,5A,6,7,8►9,10,11 Indian Riva Ca Approved Date Admin. l4 8udoel Dept. _ Risk Mgr. 592.10 TOTALS I s— 592.10 I t MET CHANGE 1N CONTRACT PRICE I S JUSTIFICATION:• .. Contract Price Adjusted to Final Quantities The amount of the Contract will be (Decreased) (increased) By The Sum Of: Five Hundred Ninty-Two and 10/100. Dollars($ 592.10 )� The Contract Total including this and previous Change Orders Will Be: Eighteen Thousand, Six Hundred Twenty Seven and 90/100 'Doliars(s 18,627.90 ) The Contract Period Provided for Completion Will Be (Increased) (Decreased) (Unchanged): Daya This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply'bereto. Requested �. (Owner) (Date) Recommended Accepted Manometer) (Date) Approved By FmHA 34 Page Z.. of 2 - i CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NO. ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE 1 22 0.00 DATES REVISED CONTRACT" PRICE 1 , 27.90 Pro ect Contract #4 Cleaning Telex s ng of inev ew Par= JOB NAKE 6 High Rid a Mobile Home Park Sewa a Collection Systems oVNER: Indian River Count Board of Count Commission • UNIT ORIGIN ORIGINAL TOTAL UNIT PRICE REVISED TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE UNITS ;PRICE CHANGE CHANGE PRICE ' i, Mobilization 5 00.0 LS 500.00 -- -- 5x0.00 2. TV Inspection of Pineview k.2600.0 LS 2600.00 -- -- 2600.00 • 3. TV Inspection of High Rift 1300.0 LS 1300.00 - 1300.00 >Mlobile Home Park 4. Sewer Line Cleaning L' 0.7 2000 LF 1400.00 -(889) -(622.30) 777.70 Vacuuming of 6" Lines 0.7 4000 LF , 2800.00 +2,094 +1,465.80 4265.80 5 Sewer Line Cleaning L Vacuuming of 8" Lines 5-A. Sews" Line Cleaning L 1.2 -- -- +282 + 338.40 338.40 Vacuuming of 12" Lines 6. Sewer pipe Joint Test 3.0( 850 JT 2550.00 +433 •1299.00 3849.00 q. Sewer Pipe Joint Seal 19.0 280 JT 5320.00 417) -(323.00) :4997,00, S. mean Put 0-69 Deep ' 2000.0 1 �Jni 2000.00 - (1) :=,: ; -(2000.00 ) 9 Clean Out b; 8' .Deep .;; 250.0 i �I1ni 250.00 •» -(1)�:.; -(250.00) :• ;A- 10. Clean but 8-10" Deep: 250.0 1'Uni 250.00 -(1)': -(250.00) •• -0-_ 11. Clean Dut 10-12' Deep 250.0 1 Unt 250.00 -(1)•' -(250.00) -�-' • -(592.10) 18,627-90 DISCUSSION RE FIFTH COURTROOM The Board reviewed the following letter dated 6/5/89: Atub of a Comr►=ity rev. Futeteso luymWQrnitUtilities Finance Other June 5, 1989 Mr. Gary C. Wheeler, Chairman Board of County Commissioners 1840 - 25th St. Vero Beach, FL 32960 Re: Fifth Courtroom Dear Mr. Wheeler: Based on the County Administrator's March 31st projected schedule for construction of A new courthouse it appears that this project is at least 4 1/2 years from completion. Because of this delay we believe that the immediate addition of a new non -jury courtroom with associated judges office and waiting area is an essential need that must be addressed. Such a courtroom should be of sufficient size to seat between 40 and 50 35 JUN 2 01999 moK 77 ra;E131 persons and include office, secretarial courtroom. mor 7 7 c135 with the project an additional judges area, hearing room, and waiting area for the There. are a number of reasons why such an addition is required including; 1. Within the next five year period we can expect to get at least one if not two additional circuit judges in the 19th circuit. At the present time there is no office space available in the courthouse to provide offices to an additional judge. 2. .Additional courtroom space is necessary when cases are moved to this county or lengthy trials require additional judges to cover existing case load. Beginning June 12, 1989, Judge Geiger will be trying a criminal case that is expected to take between 6 and 8 weeks. At the end of August Judge Kanarek will be trying a 3 to 4 week civil trial and additional judges will be covering his regular case load. During these times there will not be sufficient courtrooms available to handle the matters that need to be taken care of. 3. There are currently two resident circuit judges hearing cases in Indian River County and three resident circuit judges with their offices in the courthouse. In the past there have been one or two non-resident circuit judges assigned to hear cases in Vero (this was before Judge Kanarek was appointed to the bench). It is expected that this will occur in the future however there is no office space presently available. 4. Many of the circuit court civil cases are now scheduled for mediation. Use of the mediation procedure has allowed us to keep pace with our ever increasing case loads by obtaining settlements in cases that wduld have otherwise required trial. At the present time we are using a conference room in the County Administration Building. It would be preferable that this mediation occur within the Courthouse and if an additional non -jury courtroom was available it would provide an appropriate setting for mediation. 5. Both county and circuit judges could make us of a non -jury courtroom in handling matters that should be held in a courtroom setting but do not require a jury. This would include small claims matters, juvenile proceedings, dissolution of marriage actions -and all related contested family law matters, and all non -jury cases in both circuit and county courts. 6. When the proposed courtroom was not being used for any of the above it would also provide quarters for grand jury proceedings and could serve a jury assembly area where jurors could wait until they were called to a courtroom. We rO believe that the site of a new non -jury courtroom and related offices would best be located in the courthouse annex in the space now occupied by the Public Defender's Office. We understange that.such a location would require that the Public Defender moved at additional expense however we believe that there are at least two overriding concerns which can only be resolved by keeping the additional courtroom in the present courthouse complex. First, from a security point of view it would be substantially easier and less expensive to provide courtroom and judge security for a space that was part of the courthouse complex. Second, as part of all court proceedings there is the necessity for access to court files and records. It would create a substantial burden on the Clerk to have to move files to an area away from the courthouse. 36 r � � So that this matter -will not be delayed we urge the Board of County Commissioners to immediately approve the additional courtroom. Please advise the time that this will be placed on your agenda so we can have a representative present to answer any questions the Board may have. Sincerely, CHARLES E. SMITH J B. B SIGER Circuit Judge County Judge e L. B. VOCELLE OE WILD Circuit Judge County J dge aAULIB . IZAN Circuit Judge Chairman Wheeler asked that he be assigned, along with the other committees, to work on this with the appropriate staff, and then set up a meeting with the Judges and come back to the Board with some kind of a recommendation or feasibility report. At that time perhaps the Judges could be here to answer any questions the Board may have as a whole. The Judges feel this is urgent, but he didn't really know if we would have any specific questions to ask until it goes back into research, especially since we are in the process of planning our new Courthouse. Chairman Wheeler advised that he had talked with a couple of the Judges this past week about the possibility of using the County Commission Chambers or other facilities such as the 2001 Building on an interim basis until the new Courthouse is built, 37 SUN 2 0 1989 mu 77 4 Boor 77 i,,,fE 13 i and one of the Judges recommended that we have a meeting and try to look at other alternatives rather than going out and hiring an architect to build a fifth courtroom at this time, especially when we don't have a master plan for the courts facility as yet. Chairman Wheeler wanted to work with Administrator Chandler and General Services Director Sonny Dean and other appropriate staff and sit down with the Judges and see what we can come up with, because he had some reservations about going out and spending $350,000 for a short-term solution to this problem. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Scurlock being absent) approved the Chairman's request to work with staff, meet with the Judges, and come back to the Board with a recommendation or a report. NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT MEETING The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the Board of County Commissioners would reconvene acting as the District Board of Fire Commissioners of the North .Indian River County Fire District. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT MEETING The Chairman announced that immediately following the North County Fire District meeting, the Board of County Commissioners would hold a meeting of the Solid Waste Disposal District Meeting. Those Minutes are being prepared separately. 38 There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board unanimously adjourned at 9:45 o'clock A.M. ATTEST: �/ all"A' hairman JUN 2 01999 39 BOOK 4 7 F.3:JE,d.�