Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/22/2014
PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF APRIL, 2014 AS CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH WHEREAS, child abuse and neglect is a serious and growing problem affecting more than 3.2 million of our nation's children annually and over 3,500 children locally; and WHEREAS, this societal malignancy known as child abuse and neglect respects no racial, religion, class or geographical boundaries, and, in fact, has been declared a national emergency; and WHEREAS, increased public awareness of the devastating problem of child abuse and neglect is our strongest weapon in the fight to end it; and WHEREAS, agencies such as The Exchange Club of Indian River, through their support of parent aide programs, parenting classes and educational programs, are making significant progress toward elimination of this heinous crime against the children and families of our nation and community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS that the month of April, 2014, be designated as CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH in Indian River County, and all citizens are urged to use this time to better understand, recognize and respond to this grievous problem. Adopted this 22nd day of April, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Wesley S. Davis, ice Chairman Qz%atE4/e eph. : ?Zw-L1 Flescher Bob Solari Tim' 2 LAW WEEK 2014 PROCLAMATION "AMERICAN DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW: WHY EVERY VOTE MATTERS" WHEREAS, Law Week is a week of public acknowledgement of our nation's and Florida's heritage of justice, liberty and equality under the law, and May 1st has been declared "Law Day" by the United States Congress; and WHEREAS, The American Bar Association has declared the theme for Law Week 2014 as "American Democracy and the Rule of Law: Why Every Vote Matters"; and WHEREAS, this year's theme recognizes the importance of each and every vote and our right to vote in local, state and national elections; and WHEREAS, the members of the Indian River County Bar Association, the Young Lawyers Division and the Indian River County Lawyers Auxiliary will celebrate Law Week with the following events: • Indian River County Lawyers Auxiliary has coordinated with every school in the County to have a lawyer visit the school to speak to the students about the importance of Law Week. • The Young Lawyers Division and the IRC Bar Association will sponsor an "Ask -a -Lawyer" on Thursday, May 1 from 10 am - 4 pm at the IRC Main Library in Vero Beach. Citizens can receive free legal advice from area volunteer attorneys. • The Supervisor of Elections will visit all of the high schools in the County to register eligible student voters. • The Young Lawyers Division will host the Judge's Breakfast on Thursday, May 1 from 8-10 am in the jury room of the courthouse for the local judges, magistrates, judicial staff and assistants and attorneys. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS that the Board does hereby proclaim April 27 through May 3, 2014, as Law Week and call upon the citizens of Indian River County to acknowledge the importance of our legal and judicial systems with appropriate ceremonies and activities, and to display the flag of the United States and Florida in support of this educational observance. The Board further encourages schools, businesses, media, religious institutions, civic, and service organizations to join members of the bar and bench in commemorating Law Week. Adopted this 22nd day of April, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IpiD1 • RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter O'Bryan, Chairman Wesley S{ avis, Vice Chairman . Flescher Bob Solari Tim PROCLAMATION SIXTH ANNUAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DAY OF SERVICE WHEREAS, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a long history of providing humanitarian services in response to emergencies and natural disasters; and WHEREAS, The Church has been challenged by its leaders to extend the same service to those in need during times other than emergencies, hence the Day of Service; and WHEREAS, On the Day of Service, members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints will volunteer in their communities and link arms with other churches, community organizations, local businesses and residents of all beliefs in an effort to assist and serve the needy and less fortunate; and WHEREAS, the Day of Service provides a much needed service to those most in need in the community and it is an opportunity for different faiths, beliefs, civic organizations, and businesses in Indian River County to share and work in service together. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, do hereby proclaim the last Saturday of April as "A DAY OF SERVICE" in Indian River County and urge citizens of all beliefs and churches of all faiths to be aware of this Indian River County Day of Service as the day in which our community of different faiths and beliefs link arms to beautify our community and lend a helping hand to those in need. Adopted this 22nd day of April, 2014 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ! Fr -!_ iL`` - Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman L Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman Flescher cica Bob Solari 3 PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING APRIL, 2014 AS FAU CENTER FOR AUTISM AND RELATED DISABILITIES MONTH WHEREAS, autism is a pervasive developmental disorder affecting the social, learning, and behavioral skills of those affected by it; and WHEREAS, autism was once thought to be a relatively rare disorder, affecting only one in 10,000 people; and WHEREAS, as more and more health professionals become proficient in diagnosing autism, more children are being diagnosed on the autism spectrum, resulting in rates as high as one in 50 school age children; and WHEREAS, while there is no known cure for autism, yet, it is well documented that if an individual with autism receives treatment early in their lives, it is often possible for that individual to make significant improvement; and WHEREAS, FAU Center for Autism and Related Disabilities is a charitable non-profit organization spearheading an awareness effort in order to educate parents, professionals, and the general public with the intent of unlocking the potential of people with autism, supporting advocacy for autism related issues and scientific research, and eliminating stigma through public awareness in order to unite the community through volunteerism; and WHEREAS, since FAU Center for Autism and Related Disabilities has provided since 2005 free consultation, training, technical assistance and support to individuals with autism, their families, schools, businesses, the medical community, as well as community and governmental agencies providing support to over 3,300 constituents across the Treasure Coast and Palm Beach Counties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board does hereby proclaim April, 2014, as FAU Center for Autism and Related Disabilities Month. Duly adopted this 22nd day of April, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I N RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman seph E. Flescher Bob Solari 4 Aboard Florida Project latus Update TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL APRIL 2014 Southeast Florida Rail Networ & Proposed "All Aboard Florida" Route All Aboard Florida (AAF) Proposal Applicant: Florida East Coast Industries (FECI) Project Proposal: Station Locations Service Frequency: Project Timeframe: Permit Activity: Operation of high-speed express intercity passenger rail service on Florida East Coast (FEC) Rail Corridor & SR 528 Miami, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Orlando (235 -mile route) 16 hourly trains in each direction (6 AM — 9 PM) Construction (2014) Initial Service (2016) Pending Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 4/2{,/2014 SF Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Approval Process by FRA AAF Project History FECI: Announced "All Aboard Florida" Project March 2012 FECI/AAF: Submittal of "RRIF" Loan Application• to Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) 2012 FECI/AAF: Submittal of EA Documentation (Southern "Initial" Segment) October 2012 FECI/AAF: Received EA Approval (Southern Segment) (West Palm Beach/Miami- track improvements& sidings; station plat ,res; gradecrossings) January 2013 FRA: Conducted EIS"Scoping Meetings" (Northern Segment) (West Rolm Beach/Orlando- track improvements; Miami/Orlando— bridges, stations, grade crossings) May 2013 RRIF - Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financmg Program (under 164) 1:.9 - Invironmanal Assessment, FIS - Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Approval Process by FRA FRA Publication of "Draft EIS" & Public Workshops May/June 2014 (per FRA estimate) FRA Public Comment Period 45 days Council & others have requested 90 days; extension requires FRA approval FRA Publication of "Final EIS" TBD FRA Public Comment Period 30 days FRA has discretion to extend FRA Issuance of "Record of Decision" TBD Minimum Considerations of an EIS 14. Contents of an Environmental Impact Statement (n): Analysis should be focused on areas of significant impact beneficial and adverse; direct, indirect, and cumulative; and both long and short-term. There should be evidence of consultation with appropriate Federal, State and local officials. At a minimum, the following areas should be considered in the environmental analysis ... 1. Air quality. 2. Water quality 3. Noise and vibration. 4. Solid waste disposal. 5 Natural ecological systans. fi. W'alands. 7. Endangorut species. S. Flood hazard evaluation & lloodplain tnanagement. 9. Coastal zone management 10. Production & consrunption of anergy. 11- Use of natural resource; other than energ), such as water, minerals, or timber. 12. Aesthetic environment & scenic resources. 13 Transportation. 14 Elderly & handicappai. 15. land use. 16 Sociooeonornic environment. 17 Public health. IR- Public safety. 19- Renu -Minn areas & oppontmitien 20. Environmental Justice. 21. Sites of historical, archeological, architectural, or cultural significance. __. Construction impacts. raoca,40 00 0,: r¢r<nre, h. -enOceac 'o,csme unasnrc.a ueah rs 4/22014 �`, 2 Council's Involvement in Project Since AAF project announcement in March 2012, Council has participated in: Public Hearings 35 Public Workshops 23 Briefings with Elected Officials 53 Other (Neighborhood & Town Hall Meetings) 8 Council's role has been to deliver and information to/from all interested parties in advance of the EIS. TCRPC Action on AAF (3/21/2014) (1) Request FRA Address Key Issues in EIS • Passenger Rail Stations • Freight Rationalization • Grade Crossings & • Land Use & Transportation Quiet Zones • Tri -Rail Coastal Link • Bridge & Marine Access Negotiations Navigation Conflicts • Wildlife Impacts • Access to Broadband Capacity (2) Extend Public Comment Period to 90 Days (3) Request FRA "EIS Workshop" in Region for Local Governments & Agencies Passen ler Rail Stations • Advance Amtrak/FEC Corridor Service • Add AAF Stops in Treasure Coast • Stations - Stuart, Fort Pierce & Vero Beach Grade Crossings & uiet Zones • • uiet Zone Fundin • FECI FDOT TIGER Grants • Pedestrian Pathways at all Grade Crossings • Consistent, Predictable & Reasonable FECI Grade Crossing Fee Schedule 4/2/2014 L\•3 Bridge & Marine Navigation Conflicts • Reduce Impacts to Bridges • Synchronize trains to reduce # of closures • Establish limits on maximum bridge closure time • Modernize Bridge Mechanisms & Structures • Establish limits on maximum bridge closure time • Improve Safety — On -Site Bridge Tender & Add 2nd (western) Police Boat & Dock in Tequesta St. Lucie River FEC RR Bridgd_oxahatchee River FEC RR Bridge Access to Broadband Ca acit • Discounted Broadband Access Rate for Public & Not -for -Profit Institutions • Local Governments, Agencies, Educational Users, Hospitals & BioTech/BioMed Users Freight Rationalization • Balance Rail Activity on Rail Network • Freight & passenger on both FEC & CSX rail corridors • Create Future Rail Demand Model (passenger & freight; CSX & FEC) Land Use & Transportation Impacts • Impacts in Historic Downtowns • Downtown parking, landscaping, transportation • Impacts to Property Values • Impacts to Traffic & Emergency Response Other Issues • Impacts on Wildlife & Listed Species • Benefit/Cost Analysis • Extend Public Comment Period to 90 Days 4/2,/2014 4.4 FRA Safety Report (4/8/2014) OF4<co4seA,RHS2r Highway Ra33 Crean and ir•spamr Program nN,siai Oti-SITF. ENGINEC.NI\;1; F'IEIA REFORI - Fart 1 — All Aboard Fltitida ,— • Focus of Report: West Palm Beach north to Cocoa • Trespassing is an "epidemic" along the corridor • AAF should install pedestrian gates for sidewalks • AAF should follow "sealed corridor" guidelines: 4lerossings = four -quadrant gates 7 crossings = 100 -foot medians 6 crossings = three -quadrant gates 23 crossings = private or recommended closure AAF "Clearinghouse" on TCRPC Website • Establish Central Location for Project -Related Documents & Reports • EA & EIS Documents • Agency Reports • Local Government Comments • Project Status & Timeline • Project -Related Contact • Federal Railroad Administration • US Department of Transportation • U.S. Coast Guard • U.S. Fish & Wildlife • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Environmental Protection Agency • Congressional Delegation TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PL:\NSING COUNCIL www.tcrpc.org Information • Florida Department of Transportation • Water Management Districts • MPOs, TPOs • Local Governments in the Region • Legislative Delegation TCRPC: Recent Public Comments Received • Congressional Delegation: • Congressman Patrick Murphy • Congresswoman Lois Frankel • Congressman Bill Posey • Local Governments: • City of Fort Pierce • Indian River County • Town of Jupiter • Town of St. Lucie Village • City of Sebastian • City of Stuart All comments from local governments, agencies & elected officials included in TCRPC agenda packages at www.tcrpc.org. 4/2/2014 11.5 4/2{/2014 ii, 6 PROCLAMATIONEveckGEO 5G frob et( DESIGNATING APRIL 22, 2014 AS EARTH DAY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WHEREAS, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, Keep Indian River Beautiful, and the Solid Waste Disposal District are committed to preserving and protecting our community; and WHEREAS, Earth Day, April 22, 2014, celebrates its 44th year, founded by Senator Gaylord Nelson in 1970 to promote ecology and respect for life on the planet as well as to encourage awareness of the growing problems of air, water and soil pollution; and WHEREAS, Earth Day is celebrated with outdoor performances where individuals or groups perform acts of service to planet earth. Ways of observing Earth Day include planting trees, picking up roadside and shore trash, conducting various recycling to reverse environmental destruction; and WHEREAS, each year on Earth Day, more than one million Americans unite to clean-up parks, neighborhoods, and beaches; and WHEREAS, Earth Day efforts uplift our communities, provide service to those in need and build bridges of friendship among citizens, members of all faiths, civic leaders, and community organizations in Indian River County; and �.. WHEREAS, the Board encourages all residents of Indian River County to come celebrate Earth Day, 2014 on Saturday, April 26 from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at the Sebastian Riverview Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board does hereby designate April 22, 2014 as Earth Day in Indian River County. Duly adopted this 22nd day of April, 2014 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Pe . O'Bryan, Chairman esley S. Davis, Vice Chairman eph E. lescher Bob Solari INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: 4/22/14 Office of `� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: William K. DeBraal - Deputy County Attorney DATE: April 11, 2014 SUBJECT: Indian River County Code Chapter 309, Fair Housing - Annual Report As the administrator of the County's Fair Housing Ordinance, please be advised that no complaints of discriminatory housing practices have been reported or received since the last annual report. WKD/nhm cc: Sasan Rohani 1.C, Pi eE ! IN f7o7Ati.413QI, 5 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIRECT THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: April 10, 2014 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS April 3, 2014 to April 10, 2014 HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of April 3, 2014 to April 10, 2014. Attachment: DB: MS 6 CHECK NBR 310651 310652 310653 310654 310655 310656 310657 310658 310659 310660 310661 310662 310663 310664 310665 310666 310667 310668 310669 310670 310671 310672 310673 310674 310675 310676 310677 310678 310679 310680 310681 310682 310683 310684 310685 310686 310687 310688 310689 310690 310691 310692 310693 310694 310695 310696 310697 310698 310699 310700 310701 310702 310703 310704 310705 310706 310707 310708 CK DATE 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10,2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10i2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4, 10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4%10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 CHECKS WRITTEN VENDOR COASTAL DOORS INC PORT CONSOLIDATED INC STURGIS LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO JORDAN MOWER INC VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC COPYCO METAL CULVERTS VELDE FORD INC AT&T WIRELESS AT&T WIRELESS B G KENN INC COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE DELTA SUPPLY CO E -Z BREW COFFEE & BOTTLE WATER SVC GRAINGER KELLY TRACTOR CO PULSAFEEDER INC UNIT OF IDEX CORP MY RECEPTIONIST INC AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP DAILY COURIER SERVICE HACH CO KSM ENGINEERING & TESTING INC HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC PETES CONCRETE EGP INC VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC ACE PLUMBING INC TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC MORNING STAR PERSONILIZED APPAREL INC BARTH CONSTRUCTION INC DELL MARKETING LP GENERAL PART INC GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER BAKER & TAYLOR INC MIDWEST TAPE LLC MICROMARKETING LLC K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT CITY OF VERO BEACH STEPHEN WOJTASZEK ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE B/C B/S OF FL ADM FEE JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC WAL MART STORES EAST LP AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION INC ACUSHNET COMPANY AQUAGENIX AMOUNT 660.00 63,013.36 29.47 49.32 458.30 55.36 3,137.20 762.91 1,404.82 100.00 5.34 246.40 162.96 72.91 316.16 87.57 627.52 602.70 417.50 34.58 1,343.00 748.77 270.00 11,087.47 618.59 1,500.00 189.25 355.27 191.25 710.92 1,168.92 24,196.24 1,275.00 56,795.25 60,231.85 1,390.23 49.00 2,075.75 629.70 211.91 10.00 35,939.50 2,020.05 171.79 19,804.26 58,882.47 36.30 142.32 478.38 5,486.49 3,328.97 23.00 33,516.45 1,422.16 226.06 173.78 127.50 487.00 1 7 CHECK NBR 310709 310710 310711 310712 310713 310714 310715 310716 310717 310718 310719 310720 310721 310722 310723 310724 310725 310726 310727 310728 310729 310730 310731 310732 310733 310734 310735 310736 310737 310738 310739 310740 310741 310742 310743 310744 310745 310746 310747 310748 310749 310750 310751 310752 310753 310754 310755 310756 310757 310758 310759 310760 310761 310762 310763 310764 310765 310766 310767 310768 CK DATE VENDOR 4/10/2014 INDIAN RIVER HABITAT 4/10/2014 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 4/10/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS 4/10/2014 DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING & TESTING 4/10/2014 DON LAWLESS 4/10/2014 TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC 4/10/2014 VERO HERITAGE INC 4/10/2014 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 4/10/2014 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 4/10/2014 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 4/10/2014 ACUSHNET COMPANY 4/10/2014 MIKE CLIFFORD 4/10/2014 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 4/10/2014 THOMAS S LOWTHER FUNERAL HOME CORP 4/10/2014 FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYER LABOR 4/10/2014 STATE ATTORNEY 4/10/2014 STATE ATTORNEY 4/10/2014 CITY OF FELLSMERE 4/10/2014 JOSEPH A BAIRD 4/10.'2014 COX GIFFORD SEAWINDS 4/10/2014 COX GIFFORD SEAWINDS 4/10/2014 BE SAFE SECURITY ALARMS INC 4/10/2014 GERALD A YOUNG SR 4/10/2014 GREY HOUSE PUBLISHING 4/10/2014 RANGE ROAD MINE LLC 4/10/2014 MISDU MICHIGAN STATE 4/10/2014 ALAN C KAUFFMANN 4/10/2014 WESTSIDE REPROGRAPHICS OF VERO BEACH 4/10/2014 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL INC 4/10/2014 COMCAST 4/10/2014 COMCAST 4/10/2014 ADVANCED XEROGRAPHICS IMAGING 4/10/2014 VORTECH PHARMACEUTICALS LTD 4/10/2014 IDEA GARDEN ADVERTISING 4/10/2014 DONADIO AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 4/10/2014 C & C ELECTRIC WORKS INC 4/10/2014 SOUTHERN PLUMBING INC 4/10/2014 JAMES WILLIAM OOLEY 4/10/2014 CAROLINA SOFTWARE INC 4/10/2014 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 4/10/2014 ST LUCIE COUNTY BOCC 4/10/2014 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 4/10/2014 CONTROL SYSTEMS DESIGN INC 4/10/2014 VAN WAL INC 4/10/2014 JOSEPH W VASQUEZ 4/10/2014 HYDROMENTIA 4/10/2014 JOHNS EASTERN COMPANY INC 4/10/2014 OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER 4/10/2014 M -B COMPANIES INC 4/10/2014 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 4/10/2014 3-D FENCING 4/10/2014 DICKERSON FLORIDA INC 4/10/2014 ETR LLC 4/10/2014 BEACHLAND CLEANING SERVICE 4/10/2014 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 4/10/2014 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 4/10/2014 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 4/10/2014 GARY L EMBREY 4/10/2014 C W NIELSEN MFG CORP 4/10/2014 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES AMOUNT 76.91 5.412.21 25.36 507.00 100.00 229,665.04 1,425.00 511.75 3,788.71 1,410.68 354.58 300.00 2.450.00 425.00 85.00 10.588.60 200.00 202.42 200.00 425.00 425.00 120.00 90.00 233.05 4,973.59 445.75 160.00 INC 91.08 6,198.45 69.95 113.15 1,222.73 183.31 150.00 4,031.17 4,054.00 2,406.00 40.00 500.00 1,572.00 92,076.75 400.10 11,250.00 167.00 40.00 3,950.10 20,343.50 386.09 16,060.00 2,169.00 1,900.00 194,050.57 155.54 837.00 268.70 272.34 151.96 60.00 1,500.00 503.33 2 8 CHECK NBR 310769 310770 310771 310772 310773 310774 310775 310776 310777 310778 310779 310780 310781 310782 310783 310784 310785 310786 310787 310788 310789 310790 310791 310792 310793 310794 310795 310796 310797 310798 310799 310800 310801 310802 310803 310804 310805 310806 310807 310808 310809 310810 310811 310812 310813 310814 310815 310816 310817 310818 310819 310820 310821 310822 310823 310824 310825 310826 310827 310828 CK DATE VENDOR 4/10:2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10!2014 4110/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 JOSE RIVERA CAROLE .1 MADIGAN DANE PFARR METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 1ST FIRE & SECURITY INC FLORIDA SUPERIOR SAND INC CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC KENNY CAMPBELL JR NORMAN GOODMAN PETER OBRYAN PAK MAIL COMMUNICATIONS BROKERS & CONSULTANTS INC JOHNNY B SMITH MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS INC KB HOME TREASURE COAST FERGUSON. CLIFFORD V CHARLES A WALKER BRIAN FREEMAN DANIEL IOFFREDO BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC MARINCO BIOASSAY LABORATORY INC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE OPT K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING DAVID L HANCOCK TERESA PULIDO SOUTHEAST POWER SYSTEMS OF ORLANDO EXPRESS SUPPLY INC CHRISTINA RIPPLE SANDY ARACENA NIC MANAGEMENT LLC EVERY FLORIDA HOME KNAPHEIDE TRUCK EQUIPMENT SOUTHEAST HELPING ANIMALS LIVE -OVERCOME HEALTH ADVOCATE INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC POW R MOLE SALES LLC WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC LISA BEZAK SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES BOULEVARD TIRE CENTER JULIE NORMAN TC XPERIENCE GUIDE JANCY PET BURIAL SERVICE SAFETY SCHELL CORPORATION PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC DELRAY MOTORS JOSEPH CATALANO FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC RAYMOND J DUCHEMIN TOTAL BUILDING CONCEPTS KEITH GROCHOLL YP LLC HIGHMARK STOP LOSS LINDA GRAHAM TAMATHA R TORRES REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC LOWES HOME CENTERS INC LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC AMOUNT 40.00 704.00 40.00 1,629.87 204.00 837.76 1,459.88 160.00 120.00 344.88 74.30 12.30 120.00 9,258.79 33.43 250.00 200.00 124.66 40.00 400.85 283.62 2,020.00 7,463.73 9,981.75 2,310.00 1,598.50 120.00 270.00 177.95 16.09 120.00 81.25 246.26 861.13 22.00 1,107.15 586.08 683.46 101.50 73.96 176.75 5,905.94 120.00 79.00 153.00 1,837.14 8,622.55 65.75 100.00 5,733.33 100.00 62.37 40.00 167.00 16,439.50 270.00 120.00 12.96 1,382.73 6,948.48 3 9 CHECK NBR 310829 310830 310831 310832 310833 310834 310835 310836 310837 310838 310839 310840 310841 310842 310843 310844 310845 310846 310847 310848 310849 310850 310851 310852 310853 310854 310855 310856 310857 310858 310859 310860 310861 310862 310863 310864 310865 310866 310867 310868 310869 310870 310871 310872 310873 310874 310875 310876 310877 310878 310879 310880 310881 310882 310883 310884 310885 310886 310887 310888 CK DATE 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 VENDOR GAUDET ASSOCIATES INC CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC AGN SPORTS LLC SOUTHERN SEWER EQUIPMENT SALES STEVEN G HANSEN IMPECCABLE SIGNS INC WILLIAM C CARROLL W&G MAINTENANCE CARMEN LEWIS NICOLE GRAPPO STRAIGHT OAK LLC SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT LLC MICHAEL YOUNG MOHAWK CARPET DISTRIBUTION INC CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION LOTUS AMMUNITION WORX LLC WATERSHED INNOVATIONS LLC WADE WILSON US DEPARTMENT OF HUD SUTTON PLACE CONDO ASSOCIATION DONNA BAIRD RICHIE THE ROOFER & COMPANY INC JOSEPH DICINE JR UT REFUNDS UT REFUNDS UT REFUNDS UT REFUNDS EUGENE COLLINS BARBARA & MARIO BIANCO SCHLITT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FARLESS PROPERTIES LLC LAWRENCE BONSPILLE WRIGHT CAPITAL FUND LLC JOSEPH MILLIGAN ARTHUR J SALADINO PAMELA E LEWIS JOHN P GRIFFIN JOHN GIORDANO DAVID S LESHKO WILLIAM J & DEBRA WICHTERMAN MARTHA & CRAIG POWELL MARGARET LEE TIEBOUT MEDICAL COACHES CYNTHIA GARNER MARCILEE BREEDING DEBBIE ROSETTA CURTIS HIGGINS JUDITH STAALESEN DEE CROSS MARY SCOTT SANDRA DETWILER ANGELA HOWAT KATHERINE WESTCOTT GERALD PERRY SHARON ROOKS MARY ANNE RITCHIE PHH MORTGAGE CORP NASHALIE REYES KEVIN HOLCOMBE LINDA ELY AMOUNT 2,640.00 1,382.49 150.00 57,974.00 120.00 84.00 21.96 880.00 120.00 90.00 584.55 3,265.50 60.00 1,257.07 2,593.74 4,900.00 375.00 60.00 276.00 500.00 2,474.04 9,520.00 89.40 68.22 33.08 329.68 114.99 38.01 40.11 44.52 78.13 45.89 193.14 37.56 70.75 19.70 30.35 6.74 78.32 34.10 37.70 43.20 1.22 125.13 27.84 49.41 32.81 67.79 38.28 42.74 56.75 61.44 60.30 33.26 24.66 24.05 38.31 38.21 27.70 184.63 4 10 CHECK NBR 310889 310890 310891 310892 310893 310894 310895 310896 310897 310898 310899 310900 310901 310902 310903 310904 310905 310906 310907 310908 310909 310910 310911 310912 310913 310914 310915 310916 310917 310918 310919 310920 310921 310922 310923 310924 310925 310926 310927 310928 310929 310930 310931 310932 Grand Total: CK DATE 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10,2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 VENDOR CHARLIE JOHNSON JOHN & REBECCA SYNOWIEC SMH TRANCHE 2 LLC ALEXANDRA MATTA-HARRIS JULIE BOSWELL WILLIAM TOBIN CATALINA URBINA GO CALENDARS & GAMES ARHONDO & WARD GUINN SUSAN BAILEY JAMES R SAPP VINCENT VERRILLI PAUL S & JENNIFER PETERS A II BLAKE SARAH FLORES LILIANA VARGAS JAMES TAYLOR JANICE MELOSKY NATALIE PEDRO SHAWN & STACY MOONSAMMY SUNYA F JACOBS IRA NAHOUM HAROLD STAFFORD STEVEN KRITZMAN FRITZ JOHNSON ANGELINE VANCUREN SHANTARRA HOUSTON STEPHANIE CRAVENHO NANCY LINEBACK KARL DAVIS LEWIS & PATRICIA GREEN MARIEL & ADAM MENDES MAI TRAN CHRISTOPH LINHART VERNONE PROPERTIES LLC JONATHAN HUDSON FREDA BALLUCH FRANK HINZMAN THOMAS SLATER WILLLIAM GERTIS ANGEL ROSADO LAURA SCHLEMMER IESHIA CYNTHIA PATTERSON CXA-18 CORPORATION A1\10UNT 79.27 86.22 41.61 90.68 222.74 81.48 17.72 100.00 43.43 43.70 41.23 16.18 36.02 45.07 68.73 73.11 26.02 12.30 76.73 36.02 28.68 75.96 72.43 50.91 37.75 75.96 9.12 21.80 18.53 16.52 87.80 22.49 51.85 8.45 30.31 78.47 74.44 37.10 12.40 69.08 22.50 45.15 90.95 335.82 1,218,158.55 5 11 TRANS. NBR 1003837 1003838 1003839 1003840 1003841 1003842 1003843 1003844 1003845 1003846 1003847 1003848 1003849 1003850 1003851 1003852 1003853 1003854 1003855 1003856 1003857 1003858 1003859 1003860 1003861 1003862 1003863 1003864 1003865 1003866 1003867 1003868 1003869 1003870 1003871 1003872 1003873 1003874 1003875 1003876 1003877 1003878 1003879 1003880 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD DATE 4/3/2014 4/3/2014 4/3/2014 4/3/2014 4/3/2014 4/3/2014 4/3/2014 4/3/2014 4/3/2014 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 4/9/2014 VENDOR UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE PRIDE ENTERPRISES CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA AT&T WASTE MANAGEMENT INC HENRY SCHEIN INC INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC ST LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE CO ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC PARKS RENTAL & SALES INC INDIAN RIVER BATTERY REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS INC ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP HOMELAND IRRIGATION SVI SYSTEMS INC COMPLETE ELECTRIC INC SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS S & S AUTO PARTS STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC PARKS RENTAL & SALES INC COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL RING POWER CORPORATION ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC PETERSEN INDUSTRIES INC ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS AUTO PARTNERS LLC S & S AUTO PARTS EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER AMOUNT 1,852.50 11,580.63 54.80 2,240.00 173.96 33.913.52 2,306.57 29.60 29.60 2,128.74 267.20 1,138.75 6,372.50 250.00 1,208.46 2,885.17 130.00 157.98 373.97 42.92 185.00 707.00 5,218.96 142.20 165.00 1,428.73 169.38 467.75 613.40 275.00 139.93 99.83 1,506.60 931.21 24,499.80 288.85 420.00 156.50 1,746.24 411.18 630.96 97.64 88.16 56.00 107,582.19 1 12 TRANS NBR 2926 2927 2928 2929 2930 2931 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH DATE 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/4/2014 4/7/2014 4/8/2014 4/8/2014 VENDOR FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM KIMLEY HORN & ASSOC INC CDM SMITH INC PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC IRS -PAYROLL TAXES I R C HEALTH INSURANCE - TRUST AMOUNT 385.487.55 11,972.00 39,359.50 56,048.73 15,265.16 449,746.90 957,879.84 1 13 Consent Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: To: From: Prepared By: Subject: April 10, 2014 Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Terry Southard, Operations Manager /\,) Final Payment and Release of Retainage to Gulf States Industries, Inc., for the IRC Utility Services Roof Replacement —Bid No.: 2013040 DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On June 18, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) awarded Bid No. 2013040 in the amount of $249,500.00 to Gulf States Industries, Inc. The bid award was to replace the roofs at the Hobart RO Plant (also referred to as North RO), the South County RO Plant, and the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. On November 5, 2013, the BCC approved Change Order No. 1 to eliminate abandoned rooftop curbs, and replace the lightning protection system. The Change Order amount of $17,150.00 brought the total contract amount to $266,650.00. ANALYSIS: Gulf States Industries, Inc. has completed the work and is now requesting final payment and release of retainage. To date Gulf States Industries, Inc. has been paid $253,317.50. Payment in the amount of $13,332.50 will complete the County's obligation to the contractor. FUNDING: Funds for this project are derived from the Renewal and Replacement (R&R) budget in the operating fund. Operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales. Description Account Number Amount Retainage — SCRO/NCRO Roof Replacements 471-206000-13508 $12,190.00 Retainage — South WWTF Roof Replacement 471-206000-13509 $ 1,142.50 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the BCC approve Final Pay to Gulf States Industries, Inc., in the amount of $13,332.50. F:\Utilities\UTILITY - EMPLOYEE FOLDERS\Terry Southard\Agendas\Agenda- Final Pay Gulf States Industries Final Pay AH- Page 1 of 2 Ao.Doc 14 ATTACHMENT(s): Application from Gulf Stream Industries for Payment No. 4 -Final Retention Letter of Certification on Final Inspection from MBV APPROVED FOR AGENDA: For: h A. Baird, County Administrator Date Indian River Co. Approved Date Administration i .01:>)/ y Legal t, r .� Budget �y, 1ll Utilities IK i f Utilities -Finance Cox- <{-/y /y 15 To: From: APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT N0. 4 - FINAL Retention tndfen River County BOCC Galt Slants Inriustriee, Inc. (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) Contract BID NO,2013040 Project: Root Repttzcment Pulled el the Hobart RO Flanl, Sault County RO Plonl, and South Rniional Wastewater Treatment Redlines OWNER's Contract No. . 1-10-14 •ENGINEER'S Project No. For Work accomplished through the date of: 1. Original Contract Price: • ' • 2. • Net change by Change Orders and Written Amendments (+ or -): 3. Current ContractPrice (1 plus.2): 4. . Total.completed andstored to date 5. Retainage (per Agreement):. 0 % of completed Work: S % of retainage: S 249.500.00 $ 17,150.00 266,650.00 5 256,650.00 Total Retainage:. $ 0 6.. Total completed and stored to date Tess retainage (4 minus 5): 7. Less previous Application for Payments: $ 253.317.50 8. DUE THIS APPLICATION (6 MINUS 7): S 13,332.50 $ 266,650.00 Accompanying Documentation:, CONTRACTOR'S Certification: The undersigned CONTRACTOR certifies that (1) title to all Work, materials and equipment incorporated in said Work or otherwise: listed in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to OWNER at time of payment free and clear'. of all iLiens, security interests and encumbrances; (2) all Work covered . by this Application for Payment is accordance with the Contract Documents and not defective; and (3) the labor and materials listed ori this Application;;for Payment have been used In the construction of this Work and payment received 'from the last progress payment has .been used to make payments to all subcontractors, laborers, matertalmen and suppliers except as. listed below Dated I/v7,Sn /// /-7/icy State of rtn< /l Gull Stales Industries, Inc. County of "4 . Subs rlbed and sworn to before me this ;x'SP" �r day rp -AptuA y , ::26 it( ./! Q.!c t?ii zc -fqoliry Public U / My Commission expires: --)/V ./�0/i Payment of the above AMOT'bUE THIS APPLICATION is recommended. r41 e li.. 1 • .ia (407}.398.0153 MARIANNE TAGO MY COMMISSION #FF020201 EXPIRES•Mey 21, 2017 Flerl d n No laryS a rvlce.com Dated 4/7/14 M4v e iltrwut ;I/ INEERBy: /�C�/ r P6, ENGINEER EJCDC.No. C -700•E'(2002 Edition) z• Preparedby the Engineers Joint Contract Daarmenls Committee and endorsed byTno Assado1ad General Contractors ofAffiance and the Construction Specification Institute. CONTRACTOR _00800-22 16 FJMBV rNGINEERING, INC. >IA BOWLESVILLAMIZAR &ASSOCIATES w.mbveng.com CA #3728 April 11, 2014 Mr. Vincent Burke, P.E., Director Indian River County Dept. of Utility Services 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Subject: Roof Replacement Project at Hobart RO Plant, South County RO Plant, and South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities Vero Beach, Florida Engineer's Project Number: 13-155 Dear Mr. Burke: This letter shall serve as a certification that a final inspection was performed for the roof replacements projects at the subject project. All methods and specifications for the repairs match those prescribed by this office. Should you have any questions regarding the above subject, please do not hesitate to contact our office. ootoiaiiiaa,i6e 4. , g,, iS, .' `p �'�_ i '�jI1� .xs. 13 * Rodolfo `' ill. "Tzar P.R. s. -oFL P.ETRAIO10 •.'»' '3o�,4 '•. FC013V�P•'cam ���'` °eeeeaeaaaaasa1` ". cc: Mr. Terry Southard, Operations Manager - Indian River County Utilities 1835 20th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 772.569.0035 Fax 772.778.3617 1250 W. Eau Gallie Blvd., Suite L Melbourne, FL 39235 321.253.1510 Fax: 321.253.09 I I 806 Delaware Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 772.468.9055 Fax: 772.778.3617 17 CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Thru: Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator) From: Mary D. Snyder, Library Services Director Date: April 10, 2014 Subject: State Aid Amended Agreement BACKGROUND: The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved the State Aid Application and Agreement on August 20, 2013, during their regular meeting. Since that time, the Division of Library & Information Services and the Department of Financial Services (DFS) have been working together gathering additional information, and recently received additional clarification from DFS. In order for payment of the grant to be processed, an Amendment to the State Aid Agreement must be signed. ANALYSIS: This Amendment requires documentation that at least one of the Indian River County's library locations is open to the public 40 hours or more per week. I have certified the required documentation. The second item changed the distribution of the grant funds from two payments to one payment. The remainder of the original Agreement including the grant funding level remains in full force and effect. FUNDING: This is financial information only and requires no matching funds. The grant is for $92,962.00 for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that the Board authorize Chairman to sign the amended agreement (two copies attached) and return to the Library Services Director to be forwarded to the appropriate State Library staff for final approval and signature. One executed copy will be returned to Clerk to the Board. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment Number 1 to the State Aid to Libraries Grant Agreement Approved Agenda Item BY: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator FOR: April 22, 2014 Indian River Co. Approved Date Administration E= /(o Jg County Attorney ! ' `-11 t 4 ,.s` Budget Department y - /3• P/ Risk Management F:\Assistant County Administrator\AGENDA ITEMS \2014\BCC 04 APR 2014\BCC Memo - Library State Aid Amended Agreement.doc 18 PROJECT NUMBER: 14 -ST -23 Florida Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services STATE AID TO LIBRARIES GRANT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO THE GRANT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT TO THE GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN the State of Florida, Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services, hereinafter referred to as the DIVISION, and the GRANTEE: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners for and on behalf of Indian River County Library the PROJECT: State Aid to Libraries Grant The parties entered into a grant agreement dated 2/10/2014, for implementation of a State Aid to Libraries Grant. The parties now mutually desire to amend certain terms and conditions of the grant agreement. In consideration of the covenants contained herein, it is agreed as follows: 1. All sections of the original grant agreement not specifically amended by this or a prior written amendment and all prior written amendments are hereby reaffirmed. 2. The grant agreement is hereby revised as follows: I. The GRANTEE agrees to: a. Provide the following as grant deliverables: Have at least one library, branch library or member library open 40 hours or more each week. II. The DIVISION agrees to: c. To distribute grant funds in one payment. The payment will be requested by the DIVISION from the Chief Financial Officer upon execution of the amendment. 19 3. This amendment shall be effective upon execution. This amendment is executed and entered into WITNESSETH: THE GRAN I'BE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Signature of Authorized Official Peter O'Bryan, Chairman Typed Name and Title of Authorized Official Approved by BCC: April 22, 2014. THE DIVISION Judith A. Ring, Director Division of Library and Information Services Department of State, State of Florida Witness Witness Witness Witness 3/14 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY DYLAN REINGOLD COUNTY ATTORNEY 20 Invoice for Payment Grantee: Indian River County Library Project Number: 14 -ST -23 Project Name: State Aid to Libraries Grant Invoice Amount: $92,962 Dates of Service: October 1, 2013 — March 31, 2014 Deliverables: Have at least one library, branch library or member library open 40 hours or more a week. Documentation: Documentation showing that at least one library, branch library or member library is open 40 hours or more a week. I certify that the deliverable has been met. Mary D. Snyder Name (typed) 4/8/14 Date 21 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM CONSENT 1) TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine G -- SUBJECT: Final Release of Retainage - Professional Services Agreement with Carter Associates, Inc. IRC Project No. 9810B 66th Avenue Paving Improvements, Phase 2 (4th Street to 16th Street) DATE: April 9. 2014 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Indian River County entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Carter Associates, Inc. on November 17, 1998 for the above subject project and nineteen (19) amendments have been executed for additional services bringing the contract total to $718,345.00 plus reimbursables. Final cost of the contract is $720,008.60. On June 18, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners approved partial release of retainage to Carter Associates, Inc. in the amount of $57,600.68. The 66th Avenue, Phase 2 (from 4th Street to 16th Street) paving improvements project has been completed and Carter Associates, Inc. has submitted Application for Payment No. 113 -Final, dated April 4, 2014 in the amount of $5,826.24 for final release of retainage. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available from the following accounts: Utilities Retainage 66th Ave Water Main Conflict (4th St — 12th St) Account No. 471-206000-10506 ($621.47) Utilities Retainage Account No. 471-206000-13526 66th Ave Water Main (4th St — 16th St) ($1,055.63) Traffic Impact Fees, District 2 Retainage Account No. 102-206000-06021 66th Avenue (12th Street to SR60) ($519.21) Optional Sales Tax/Road & Bridge Retainage Account No. 315-206000-06021 66th Avenue (12th Street — SR60) ($3,629.93) FPublic Works \ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS \9810B -66th Ave Ph 2 4th St to 16th StAdmirn agenda items \9810 BCC Agn Carter Final Release of Retainage 04-22-2014 doc 22 PAGE TWO Final Release of Retainage Carter Associates, Inc. FOR BCC Agenda April 22, 2014 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends final release of retainage to Carter Associates, Inc. for the completed services and payment of Application of Payment No. 113 -Final, dated April 4, 2014 in the amount of $5,826.24. ATTACHMENTS Application for Payment No. 113 -Final from Carter Associates, Inc. dated April 4, 2014 DISTRIBUTION 1. Carter Associates, Inc. 2. Indian River County Utilities APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR April 22, 2014 Indian River County Appr Date Administration �1 4/6)/7 Budget 4/44 Legal 4/- i LI -ii' -'14/ Utilities i//JIL Public Works ,. / - Engineering 9- q_ J,V F:\Public Works \ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS \9810B -66th Ave Ph 2 4th St to 16th StAdmim\agenda items\9810 BCC Agn Carter Final Release of Retainage 04-22-2014.doc 23 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 113 - Final Through AMENDMENT NO. 19 66TH AVENUE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SR 60 AND 4TH STREET HRC PROJECT NO. 9810 To: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Contract for WORK ORDER NO. 4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - 66TH AVENUE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SR 60 AND 4TH STREET INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT No. 9810 For work accomplished through the date of January 31, 2014 Task Contract Amount Complete From Previous Pay Requests Complete This Pay Request Amount Due Original Contract (Inc. Amend #1 & #2) $ 178,820.00 100.0000 0.00 $ 178,820.00 Final Design & Permitting (Amend. #3) 93,000.00 100.0000 0.00 93,000.00 Final Design & Permitting (Amend. #4) 30,640.00 100.0000 0.00 30,640.00 Const. Phase Services (Amend. #3) 20,000.00 99.8175 0.00 19,963.50 Reimbursable Expenses (Orig. Contract) Cost N/A 0.00 1,934.40 Amendment#5 21,460.00 100.0000 0.00 21,460.00 Const. Phase Services (Amend. #6) 4,500.00 100.0000 0.00 4,500.00 Amendment#6 56,135.00 100.0000 0.00 56,135.00 Amendment #7 2,790.00 100.0000 0.00 2,790.00 Amendment #8 28,1 10.00 100.0000 0.00 28,1 10.00 Reimbursable Expenses (Amend. 48) 350.00 N/A 0.00 707.86 Amendment #9 40,480.00 100.0000 0.00 40,480.00 Reimbursable Expenses (Amend. #9) , 600.00 N/A 0.00 592.14 Amendment #10 73,980.00 100.0000 0.00 73,980.00 Reimbursable Expenses (Amend. #10) 600.00 N/A 0.00 513.42 Amendment #11 31,030.00 100.0000 0.00 31,030.00 Amendment #12 23,700.00 100.0000 0.00 23,700.00 Amendment #12 - T&M 9,830.00 100.0000 0.00 9,830.00 Amendment #13 - T&M 28,000.00 100.0000 0.00 27,990.00 Amendment #14 - T&M 30,000.00 100.0000 0.00 29,991.20 Amendment #15 7,490.00 1 100.0000 0.00 7,490.00 Amendment #16 Task #1 - TRC Bridge Design 6,300.00 100.0000 0.00 6,300.00 Task #2 - TRC Bridge Construction 8,300.00 100.0000 0.00 8,300.00, Task #3 - KAMM 500.00 100.0000 0.00 500.00 Task #4 - Carter Associates, Inc. 2,900.00 100.0000 0.00 2,900.00 Amendment#17 4,040.00 99.9549 0.00 4,038.18 Amendment #18 3,370.00 99.9747 0.00 3,369.15 Amendment#19 11,420.00 95.8297 0.00 10,943.75 TOTAL GROSS CONTRACT AMOUNT DUE $ 720,008.60 MINUS AMOUNT OF RETAINAGE (10% of Total Gross Contract Amount Due) -72.000.86 JAAR\Manual Incoiccs\9A-23 E IRC 66th Acc1911--23.A Appl for Pa,nrcnt 2013_2014 Page 1 24 PLUS AMOUNT OF RETAINAGE PREVIOUSLY RELEASED (5% of Gross Contract Amount Invoiced through 03/29/02 & Design Fee Retainage from Pay Application #103) 66,174.62 CONTRACT AMOUNT EARNED TO DATE (Total Gross Contract Amount Due minus/plus Amount of Retainage) $ 720,008.60 TOTAL PAID TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO THIS PAY REQUEST -714,182.36 AMOUNT DUE THIS PAY REQUEST - RELEASE OF RETAINAGE (Contract Amount Earned To -Date minus Total Amount Paid to Engineer Prior To This Pay Request) $ 5,826.24 ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION: THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFIES that I have checked and verified the above Application for Payment No. 113 - Final and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is a true and correct statement of work performed and/or material supplied by the ENGINEER; that all work and/or materials included in the Application for Payment have been inspected by me and/or by my duly authorized representative or assistants; that is has been performed and/or supplied in full accordance with the requirements of the referenced Contract and with sound engineering practice and judgment; and that the payment amount claimed and requested by the ENGINEER is correctly computed on the basis of work performed and/or materials supplied to date. THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE ALSO CERTIFIES that all previous progress payments received from the COUNTY on account of Work done under the Contract referred to above have been applied on account to discharge ENGINEER'S legitimate obligations incurred in connection with Work covered by prior Applications for Payment numbered 1 through 113 - Final inclusive; and if this is a Final Pay Request, I further certify that all persons doing work upon or furnishing materials or supplies for this project under this foregoing Contract have been paid in full. ENGINEER: CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. 1708 21st Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772) 562-4191 State of Florida County of Indian River Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4th day of April, 2014. otary Public My Commission expires: 09/23/2016 it. Notary Public State of Florida Joan M Ross t My Commission EE 837713 q Expires 09/2312016 1:1AR\Manual Invoices \91:-23 E IRC 66th Arc\98-23A Appl for Pavmcnt 2013_2014 Page 2 Dated 4/4/2014 ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE: Name & Title: heyold,_ Patrick Walther, P.E. Project Manager 25 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM Public Hearing (Legislative) 10 tA, TO: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Community Develo en Stan Boling, AICP C ty t Director FROM: Phil Matson, AICPj— MPO Staff Directo DATE: April 7, 2014 SUBJECT: Request for the Board of County Commissioners to Consider an Ordinance to Approve New Impact Fee Schedules for Non -Residential Uses for the Unincorporated Indian River County and Municipalities It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 22, 2014. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS To address infrastructure costs associated with new growth, Indian River County has, since 1986, imposed traffic impact fees on new development. In 2005, the County adopted impact fees for eight additional services/facilities. Since their adoption, impact fees have generated considerable revenue, and impact fees are now among the largest single source of funding for infrastructure projects in Indian River County. According to the Indian River County Impact Fee Ordinance, the County must periodically review and update its impact fee schedule. Since the last update was performed in 2009, the county determined last year that a new impact fee study was needed. With that in mind, staff prepared a Scope of Services for an Impact Fee update, incorporated the Scope of Services into a Request for Proposals (RFP) for consultant services, and issued the RFP. Although the Scope contained activities included in a typical impact fee update, the Scope also directed the Consultant to develop strategies to reduce non-residential impact fees. In July 2013, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) selected Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. (Consultant) to develop the Impact Fee Update. The resulting contract required the Consultant to review the county's existing impact fee formulas and policies; review previously authorized impact fee studies; utilize the latest available data to update impact fee variables and inputs; update land acquisition and infrastructure costs; review existing levels of service (for non -traffic fee categories only); update impact fee credits; and develop an updated impact fee cost schedule(s). In addition, the contract required the Consultant to review each of the F:\Community Development\Impact Fee \2014- IF Study\BCC staff report for adopting non-residential IFs April 22.doc 1 26 major components of the County's impact fee program and develop alternative strategies to reduce non- residential impact fees, while minimizing or avoiding increases to residential impact fees and while maintaining adequate levels of service. In a draft report issued in January 2014, the Consultant updated impact fee data and calculations, and developed updated impact fee schedules. In response to the directive to reduce non-residential impact fees, the Consultant applied its "Affordable Growth" methodology to the fee calculations, a methodology that considers the effects of various rates of growth on the County's ability to subsidize impact fees from other funding sources while adequately maintaining levels of service. The draft report and Affordable Growth methodology were presented by the Consultant at a Board public workshop held on January 22, 2014. At that workshop, staff discussed (and later developed) its own scenario (the "Staff Scenario") that builds upon the Affordable Growth methodology by further reducing a number of fees based on projected non -impact fee revenues and improvements necessary to adequately maintain levels of service over the next five years. At the workshop's conclusion, the Board indicated the Consultant's update and Affordable Growth methodology were generally acceptable and directed staff to conduct workshops with different interested groups and organizations regarding the impact fee update and Affordable Growth methodology. Since January, staff has conducted eight workshops with interested groups and organizations including two municipalities, and received considerable positive feedback with respect to the proposed Affordable Growth/Staff Scenario approach and resulting reductions in non-residential impact fees. On March 11, 2014, staff informed the Board of the results of the workshops and also reported that a number of commercial developers were awaiting the outcome of the impact fee update before proceeding with their projects. In response, the Board authorized staff to initiate the process of adopting the non-residential impact fee schedules in advance of the final impact fee rates for residential uses. Most recently, the Consultant revised the Draft Impact Fee Update Study Technical Report that was issued in January with a report dated April 14, 2014. The report was revised to include the final (recommended) non- residential fee schedules which are based on the Affordable Growth/Staff Scenario methodology. The Executive Summary of the latest report is attached to this staff report (Attachment 1). The full report can be accessed at http://www.irccdd.com/Applications/Impact Fee/index.html ANALYSIS In accordance with State Law, a public hearing must be conducted in order to update the Indian River County Impact Fee Ordinance and put the new Non -Residential Impact Fee Schedules for the unincorporated county and municipalities into effect. Staff has complied with the advertising requirements for the public hearing and also provided a 30 -day notice to each municipality as required by each county/municipality impact fee interlocal agreement. The Consultant has performed all tasks necessary to update the impact fee schedules for Non -Residential uses; has applied the "Affordable Growth" methodology to reduce Non -Residential Impact Fees; and has determined that the "Staff Scenario" based upon the Affordable Growth methodology is technically sound and warranted. Consequently, the Board has a reasonable basis for determining that the Consultant's update and Affordable Growth/Staff Scenario methodology utilized to reduce non-residential impact fees are acceptable. Furthermore, the Board has found that it is in the public interest to reduce non-residential impact fees to stimulate economic development. Therefore, staff has developed the attached Proposed Ordinance for Non -Residential Impact Fee Schedules for the Unincorporated County and Municipalities (Attachment 2). Said ordinance, if adopted, will establish new Impact Fee Schedules for the Unincorporated County and Municipalities for non-residential uses, based on the Consultant's report. Said ordinance and impact fee schedules will reduce impact fee rates for all except two non-residential categories. For all reduced impact fee rates, the proposed effective date will be 5/5/2014. For the Jail and Veterinary Clinic impact fee rates that will F:\Community Development\mpact Fee\20I4- IF Study\BCC staff report for adopting non-residential IFs April 22.doc 2 27 be increasing, the proposed effective date will be 10/1/2014. The proposed October 1st effective date will satisfy state statutes which require a minimum of 90 days between adoption and the effective date of any impact fee increase. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the revised non-residential impact fee schedules for the Unincorporated County and Municipalities by adopting the attached ordinance ATTACHMENTS 1) Impact Fee Update Summary Technical Report dated April 14, 2014 - Executive Summary 2) Proposed Ordinance for Non -Residential Impact Fee Schedules for the Unincorporated County and Municipalities. Indian River Co, Approved Date Admin. t*4 »1 y/16/ Ri T Legal Budget / '/� �� Dept. ////S/"/ Risk Mgr. --r F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\2014- IF Study\BCC staff report for adopting non-residential IFs April 22 dor 3 28 Executive Summary In response to high growth levels and the need to provide infrastructure to support this growth, Indian River County (IRC) implemented a Transportation Impact Fee in 1986. In 2005, the County adopted impact fees in eight additional program areas. The technical studies for all program areas were updated in 2007; however, these technical studies were not adopted. Of the nine program areas, only the transportation impact fee was later updated substantially in 2009 by an internally generated County update using data from the 2005 and 2007 studies, resulting in a fee reduction for almost all: the land uses. The eight non -transportation program fees were slightly modified in the 2009 update. Since then, the County suspended the collection of five impact fee areas to promote construction during the economic downturn, and more recently extended suspension of, correctional facilities, solid waste, and public buildings impact fees. Those three impact fee suspensions are currently in effect. Indian River County has retained Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) to prepare an update study to reflect changes to the impact fee variables for all program areas. In addition, the direction received from the ` Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is to maintain the residential land uses at the current level and develop a methodology to reduce non-residential impact fees. To address the goal of reducing fees for non-residential land uses, TOA developed the Affordable Growth methodology, which takes into consideration revenues received from the existing development -that will be used toward capacity expansion projects. As population growth rates decrease, the existing development's ability to assist in absorbing new growth's impact while maintaining the level of service (LOS) becomes more possible. The Affordable Growth method calculates the necessary impact fee levels to maintain the existing/achieved LOS given a certain level of non -impact fee funding at an estimated growth rate. It is important to note that whether to fund capacity expansion projects solely with impact fee collections or supplement them with alternative funding sources is largely a policy decision, allowing the County to contribute or limit non -impact fee funding in its service areas as appropriate based on its capital improvement planning goals and the nature of its existing impact fee program. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County April 2014 ES -1 ATTACHMENT 1 Impact Fee Update Study 29 In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established through case law since the 1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the "dual rational nexus" test, which requires that they: • Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to the need created by new development paying the fee; and • Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development, typically accomplished through a list of capacity -adding projects included in the County's Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another planning document/Master Plan. In addition, one of the requirements of the 2006 Florida Impact Fee Act is that the studies be based on most recent and localized data. This technical report has been prepared to support legal compliance with existing case law and statutory requirements. The methodology used in this report is consistent with that used in the 2004 and 2005 technical reports, which are the basis of the current adopted fees. Although the Florida courts have yet to expressly address the methodology underpinning the Affordable Growth Strategy, this aspect of the report is based on the long- standing legal standards described in this report. The technical report also documents the methodology components for each of the impact fee areas, including an evaluation of the inventory, service area, level -of -service (LOS), cost, credit, and demand components. Information supporting this analysis was obtained from the County and other sources, as indicated. The report includes results for all program areas, with the exception of educational facilities. Because the initial results have not yet been reviewed by the Indian River County School Board, this section is not included in this report. Three primary factors affected the County's impact fee levels: • Since 2005, the County built additional infrastructure and increased the capital asset inventory significantly in most program areas. This results in an increased asset value, which in turn, increases the impact fee. • In most infrastructure areas, the County used or is projected to use other revenue sources to supplement impact fees, such as optional sales tax revenues, ad valorem tax revenues, and other revenues. Depending on the program area and the level of on-going investment, this results in an increase in the credit component for some Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County April 2014 ES -2 Impact Fee Update Study 30 program areas, which in turn reduces the impact fee. In others, if the investment was made in earlier years and are not projected to continue at the same levels, the credit may decrease compared to the previous study, which in turn increases the impact fee. • Finally, the cost and demand components are adjusted to reflect the most recent available data, which affects different land uses at different rates. This technical report includes the final calculations for non-residential land uses while figures for residential land uses are still being refined. Given that the fees for almost all of the non-residential categories are decreasing, the County prefers to adopt changes to the non-residential impact fee schedule at this time. This approach is also consistent with the County's economic development goals. The following tables provide a summary of calculated fees for seven representative land uses. The complete schedule has almost 50 land uses and a comparison of all fee categories is included in Appendices G through I. The tables include the following: Table ES -1 (Unincorporated County) • Current adopted fee • Calculated maximum impact fee • Percent change from the current fee to the calculated fee • The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix G.* Table ES -2 (Unincorporated County) • Current adopted fee • Affordable growth impact fee • Percent change from the current fee to the affordable growth fee • The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix H.* Table ES -3 (Preferred Alternative, Unincorporated County) • Current adopted fee • Staff Recommended impact fee • Percent change from the current fee to the staff recommended fee • The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix I.* * Can be found in the full Impact Fee Update Study, available at www.irccdd.com/Applications/Impact_Fee/Index.htm Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County April 2014 ES -3 Impact Fee Update Study 31 The methodology used to develop the full calculated fees and affordable growth fees is documented throughout this report. The staff scenarios shown in Table ES -3 as well as Appendix I represent the County's preferred alternative and follow the affordable growth calculations, with the exception of the following policy decisions primarily based on a review of capital needs in the near future: • Adoption of maximum calculated fees for emergency services; • Application of a 50 -percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for public buildings impact fees for all land uses; • Application of a 25 -percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for parks and recreation facilities impact fees for all land uses; and • Suspension of the library impact fees. Of these, parks and recreation and libraries impact fees are charged only to residential land uses while the emergency services and public buildings impact fees are charged to both residential and non-residential land uses. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County April 2014 ES -4 Impact Fee Update Study 32 N tof- '0 . 00 t d V }' a ..�E a, N .. C CD V L Si 0+ fi V e) a O a± OD 00NYf .1 0N0 N«Cyn u /. 1 t my N `mNtON mmq am N 'O LL v ` . « u TO 0 G V F re/ 03Y Cr 01 m m 00 N . 1n 00 00 .O-1 N N m 0 m in N n N 0 N n Lel N O Inf 0.13 01 m N : v1 " N 0 N 0 n v N N CO 01 n ..l .- U CO�0 N a -' O a .m1 an T N VI. NN m n Cr N °n0 n 01 01 . N V 00 N NN O1 gE u 1,''}} L a u, ' 6 i t c ti U $4831 $6911 43.1% $285 $381 33.7% cc c•a A Nau N $185 5218 17.8% _$105 5132 25.7% ' of Iry vie m W _ .t; IA u - ~ m aN V/fNN N T ,y N CCCC 0 v Q V s m a 0 en » N N 1n o �-1 N /13 iv to G= C no go C C "-d uc� -. d ' C. V I..11 ttit 9 0 m LL= �yy V Cz $7301 254 4%I $403 233.1% A**** mm c n .-E o 1v m V mt Onc . L p V $4,4831•-$4,2481 -5.2% $2,428 -$2,742 12.9% $13,020:' 513,820 6.1% $3,798 $4,257 12.1% $1,318 $1,473 11.8% * . n o 01 0 ry p J 3 ,: a o- . o or ID 10 n1 V N 0 0 o, co ‘3-coa O y� O !!i, N 0., 3" S V n m N N n NHO n 1'i I IA, •'Y.`v.4-J art 4�i"i"k ¢. `,i r yE... ,.. ,, m N S. u LL 3 u ° « 8 Jt o m n �, ........... (` 0 O o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 f v o C 0 9 C µ a oa .u a V 4n, m m N m N N mV e a0 N N '1 00,...., fy. .a-1 In NNNNN c c cri 1n n„ n in r/3 COm a m .1 N 30/ N m o m N N 0. m yL a V • -_ d ;„ • mLL5 O -ci V u1, G U SSS t U $170 $283 66.5% $100 $156 56.0% r.co X 01 Xm0 :O-1 ,a ai c or 04 10 0 0. m d L a V c W u - m .6LLj -' V yfJ J V ; Y ' , 2 R Single Family (1,500 to 2,499 sf)du $245 $425 73.5% IMuiti-Family/AccessorvUnit I du $148 $244 64.9% 01 01mmav m o no0m a na lNN p 34 1/1 0m m1n C in N N In 10 mam O 1n N ID N N W ' Ill In 01 m N 01 01 el NN N N N 1.11 ID 01 N N N i Nan til. ,.. Z N n.`.n - 0 0 N w n 0 0 0 .7 O .1 01 210 ['Single Family (1500 to 2,499 sf) du 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 sf General Office 1,000 sf Manufacturing 1,000 sf Retail 1,000 sfgla vim... c....a oe�• ,.,/n�i..>»,.1 nnn cf YVflN=RES/OENffAt, Bank/Savings Drive -In General Office Manufacturing Retail Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru V 0 = O O N O Y ' Q1 n O N TA el CO 01 O O N O :'-4 e 01 n ti co N lic buildings are currently suspended. w 33 Y 0 u m O 0. 0 c N Y cc ISL 0 O w d NB WCO 9 d p 0) i', L a v. ms C O D re' Q Gilt Q C y $341 -87.8%1 $19 -89.2% 1%0•00T- 10$ %0'OOT- O$ %0'001- O$ %0'001- 0$ %0'O01 0$ E 0 ukyr. U il. 0 Y: fr" �'f° N hr 24V82 +'n' N N N 1 N +- T .6--. a m C m . C C 7 r1o0, =' n •c •�': � a 3 D D a U' 0 m . �r,::: vii .m. 'f m \\c c m c c c tt U m as '6'1.'2'1' $13,020 - $6,219 -52.2% S7 7901 51.9161 -49.6% Gd -:.�. u g =: a. <m IA m+ z'66«r: 01 n to 10 0 m c a v a t �`� '5a 3 'fit' m O D 'La4'- 3 Q o m o n v i}'.' T. .. U roo ti ry � mNo .+ n ';. o�'"i 0) c t ., p U %0'001- 0$ %0'OOT- 0$ %0'001- 0$ %0.001- 0$ %0'001- 0$ %0'001 0$ %0'001- OS 7„s,3_ 0 or N 1-6U wa mm nn-�°.+mm N NNM o+ N P.. , a�«rrat ,�iti,, uv 934 IFast Food nest. w/Drive-Tiii u s 1 Law Enforcement ITE LUC Land Use Unit Current Affordable Percent i Growth Change ?r a-.«vejrck�MTiLIa%aR71Fh7'rfeis�.�"k� K8.,#r9 - %6'49 IPPZ$ 841$ np - AUO Arossa»v/Allwei ilinI9 OZZ i_ %5'EL SZ4$ 54Z$ np Os 6617'Z al 0051) Allwed al8ui5 OTZ . 0 N. N m o n O . • %O 001- 0$ _ OOT, Y PP Win Auossa33v/(Ilwed-13111 OZZ %0'001- I0$ 1OLT$ 1 np ( lis 66V.Z w 005't) Allwej alBu!S OTZ alue4D 41m019 4ua»n3 lUaalad alclep�ogv lion asn puel ]nl 311 salllloe3 leuol u anon 0 0 0 0 0 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf $55 $0 -100.0% 820 Retail 1,000 Ogle $312 $0 -100.0% 1000 f $863 $0 -100.0% 1n a 00 N 4/,...4"4.,,,,, 0 0 N b 0 0 N 0 0 ,44,1.N1/1- v1 10 e H n n o N ., N N ..1 .moi N N 0 0 0 1731.711711,17. 0 0 0 0 Bank/Savings Drive -In reneral Office c 42 i Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 18a nk/Savl ngs Drive -In 'G eral Office O C1 n OQ N .+ as O 14 1) O M LO W 34 Table ES -3 (Preferred Alternative) c 0 u O a u N N C 0 �0 0 E E J. -43 u 0 cc0 a E 0 a` Q 0 0. E O Em E ��� d 5;: $278 $310 11.5% $176 $175 -0.6% $280 $459 63.9% $246 $201 -18.3% $88 $101 14.8% vi m 9 m x `c hN ° da,. 4 1 a ! r +Y' V ,f :"'?1•t'LifAd2iC:'+ o m a in o o; G m o •� nm N =II' N feIA CO01 4. $15,4041 $7,7781 mo n men IV* N m v a N 2 li. U o ra N N .-7 N 0 a °° m N r v N N rC 0 ° N b Le," N a/� n CO m n N N :a'v"5 JAL. 1 y.:::, : 1, • u m y S u O o o o C " c c c,..= a`, °p N a 84 LLilr; i 11 .7 n E Q W r u $185 $166 -10.3% $105 $103 -1.9% yi * Y X e rn rn c ae en 0 N K -..:....3 ..1.' -L.° c C OOf N ID N N 0 " 0 K `-,L4\\ " \ n m ran Lc,o N ars m a V `}co 3 " S206 $365 77.2% $121 $202 66.9%1 e m m o en : m k,: r .. .r_-. d U C A Y1xr. ' 't74 It -�''C% 0 �. � �T.. K• '. $4,483 1:-,$4,248 -5.2% $2,428 `$2,742 12.9% $13',020.17:.•:.. $6,2191 -52.2% m en ? Y a;' q N .. N N ...4 ,I. N 'N 00 N N IN .. a N a N n o N N eV m ry N w -m n N can n.* 3m e u V C A 6 V' 3 v IT3 1,1 %TOOT- 0$ LS$ %01000- 0$ SL$ %01002- 0$ 9£2$ %01000- 0$ 46$ %01002- 0$ 811$ ae o 0 0 N ID aluey3 gels luaJln) luaaJad uolleanaa 8 sHJed ae ae,3; rn m O M q" al O eon ^ N am; \ c +< \ \ • CO fIl \ CCN ,r0 tO Of CO CO c c , , .:00 m`°•: C a o o rnsei O I.../ jY--. o ., t 1 u eae o0 O O 912 (Bank/Savings Drive -In 1 1,000 sf 1 $1741 $01 -100.0% ae ae ae ae 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 cmc, = L E w • tD* N U O 2 u D = ae Ln en n az xt, a? s"• a ';:` b * * e m m N r0 n N n ae ae v o o a 0 210 Single Family (1,500 to 2,499 sf) du $170 $0 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du $100 $0 N .Oi..0 0O1 itiESIDElU7ikerD'iabl X"c+i:. tt'WFWk-4_ gVril Single Family (1,500 to 2,499 sf) du $245 $425 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du $148 $244 'NON_NRFSIDEN914L „ _ x. W -I4',1-•1,1,..,,'`.1', N N. m w N in IA 0 en ..i� N m N N N ..io N K N N 03 rn ro ^ a.. N N N el K vn. .aIN A ,.q N m h O !i1 Bank/Savings Drive -I n 1,000 sf _General Office 1,000 sf Manufacturing 1,000 sf m General Office Manufacturing Retail Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru I Reta l l Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 000.1 1.--: 7-', m m o 0,` - ry o 0 .. mna N a CO m 0, 35 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE X, IMPACT FEES, OF THE CODE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, TO AMEND CODE SECTION APPENDIX A, IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES, TO APPROVE NEW IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE UNINCORPORATED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITIES; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE FOR NEW IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES; AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND SEVERABILITY. WHEREAS, to address infrastructure costs associated with new growth, Indian River County has, since 1986, imposed traffic impact fees on new development.. In 2005, the County adopted impact fees for eight additional services/facilities, also to address infrastructure costs associated with new growth; and WHEREAS, since their adoption, impact fees have generated considerable revenue, and impact fees are now among the largest single source of funding for infrastructure projects in Indian River County; and WHEREAS, according to the Indian River County Impact Fee Ordinance, the County must periodically review the impact fee schedules and by law the county needs to keep the impact fee schedules up to date. Because the last impact fee study was performed in 2009, the county determined that a new impact fee study was due; and WHEREAS, staff prepared a scope of services for an impact fee study and fee schedule updates that was approved by the Board of County Commissioners in February, 2013; and WHEREAS, the scope of services was incorporated into a Request For Proposals and in July 2013 the Board of County Commissioners selected Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. (Consultant) and entered into a contract for services; and WHEREAS, as reflected in the Consultant's report, the Consultant has performed the tasks necessary to update the impact fee schedules for Non -Residential uses, including development of the "Affordable Growth" methodology to calculate Non -Residential Impact Fees, and WHEREAS, the Consultant has determined that recommended residential and non- residential impact fees, using the Affordable Growth methodology, are proportionate in amount to the need that new growth creates for each category of public improvements for which impact fees are collected; and WHEREAS, based on anticipated growth projections, the County's 5 -year capital improvement plan needs, and the County's policy to stimulate economic development, County staff has recommended that impact fees for libraries, public buildings, and parks and recreation trrYMPIT 1 36 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 facilities be reduced or suspended, pending further trend evaluation during the next scheduled impact fee methodological update (the "Staff Scenario"); and WHEREAS, the Consultant has determined that the "Staff Scenario," based upon the Affordable Growth methodology, is technically sound and warranted, and, based on projected non -impact fee revenues, will result in maintaining level of service standards used in the Consultant's report; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that the Consultant's update and Affordable Growth/Staff Scenario methodology utilized to reduce non-residential impact fees are acceptable and directed staff to conduct workshops with different interested groups and organizations, including two municipalities, regarding the impact fee update and Affordable Growth/Staff Scenario methodology; and WHEREAS, Staff has conducted eight workshops with interested groups and organizations, including two municipalities, and generally received positive comments and support for the proposed reductions in non-residential impact fee rates; and WHEREAS, On March 11. 2014, staff informed the Board of the results of the workshop meetings and the fact that several developers are ready to proceed with non-residential projects once the proposed non-residential impact fee schedules are in effect; and WHEREAS, Staff and the County Attorney recommended that the Board consider adopting the new impact fee schedules for non-residential uses separate from and prior to adoption of new impact fee schedules for residential uses; and WHEREAS, the Consultant and the County are proceeding as expeditiously as possible with the tasks necessary to prepare and adopt new impact fee schedules for residential uses and expect to have those fee schedules completed for consideration by the Board within one hundred and twenty (120) days; and WHEREAS, to stimulate economic development the Board wishes to make the completed non-residential fee schedule available to the community as soon as possible; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has evaluated the fee schedule adoption timeframe and has determined that it will allow the County to maintain its level of service standards and to provide the capital improvements planned for new nonresidential and residential development; and WHEREAS, the Board directed staff to advertise for a public hearing to consider adoption of the proposed non-residential impact fee schedules as soon as practicable; and WHEREAS, staff advertised for a public hearing on April 22, 2014, and also provided 30 day notice to each municipality as required by each impact fee agreement between the County and each municipality; and 2 37 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 WHEREAS, the Consultant, in coordination with staff, developed the proposed non- residential impact fee schedules based upon the Consultant's report, impact fee update, and Affordable Growth/Staff Scenario methodology. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER TITLE X. Title X, Impact Fees, of the Code of Indian River County is hereby amended as identified in Section Two, below. All current residential impact fee rates shall remain unchanged until specifically amended by ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION TWO: APPENDIX A, IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES Appendix A, Non -Residential Impact Fee Schedules, of Title X, Impact Fees, of the county code that contains the new non-residential impact fee schedules for the unincorporated Indian River County and municipalities is attached. SECTION THREE: CODIFICATION. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provision of this ordinance shall become and be made part of the Indian River County Code, and that the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered and the word ordinance may be changed to section, article or such other appropriate word or phrase in order to accomplish such intention. SECTION FOUR: SEVERABILITY. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, then said holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Furthermore, should the entirety of this ordinance be held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, it is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to reinstate the non-residential impact fees in effect prior to the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION FIVE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The non-residential impact fee rates contained in Appendix A of this ordinance shall take effect on May 5, 2014, except for the Jail and Veterinary Clinic impact fee rates that will be increasing and which shall become effective on October 1, 2014. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the 7th day of April 2014, for a public hearing to be held on the 22nd day of April 2014, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted by the following vote: 3 38 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Wesley S. Davis, Vice -Chairman Bob Solari, Commissioner Tim Zorc, Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Commissioner The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 22nd day of April 2014. Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, Florida By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman ATTEST BY: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller This ordinance was filed with the Department of State and becomes effective on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Stan Boling, A ommunity Development Director F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\2014- IF Study\201 4 Ordinance for Non -Residential impact fees-4-22-2014.doc 4 39 f E i N N n. £ . = d rat O H N K N n N isNT b nN NN N ( OTN N N T NN a T 000 EVOO d N b N V. N N NN OnTNkNh N OI N fid55.641 - . . D mNNNNNN $1,4981 <tn oca fI NN N NN NNj NYf ��; f OAi u;CNNNN O b 51,620 541 $3,634 $91 5466 512 VIin NN Mpp O Nan OI O F O 4"N N.Nr p o N a NN.bn O N.bI. o M VnN pp ./1.-N%NN N P , n b dCNOD h.n. N Q tiNIONN 0 Np 53,834 $96 52,731 568 513,963 5349 5753 519 v• V.0 V vmi H.' HN N T ti OI T m k N 01 CO w T erg CO „ N N H N n N V1 n ./INNV 41$ EIS 25 YY� °pp S..PWNNN Ipc an N anN 1PD O N n s' 00 ¢ m n v2i N VNf v,,, N pNp .. N. Vr .Tn a N e an - N N NNN rODi - an .4i .a..,..s..!-, i7i4'a$ ,,cif: ti.4 '#"w+h"'4k ' N W I i NN0 N n OTD N ,....;,-q,:' N 00 N N " b , rl ,..^=7!a— N N h 01 OOQQ1f n/aI $32.4982 ,58 n/a 5 ,�.; b m ybj e.s�' YY1I N Q N 40 N C '1 O t+ C . Cr%. 6 E« W £ N Z la g T. xgi s� a te^ ' `NN z 4'� Dn it ll n ppppr4 OI b V D V I c N N - c d �; ME." pbpp V)NNNNN N c c 10 c Of Q ,G IG 6y T b r N n n .4 N b N --ad- b T b O A N n N n N N N NVI N N N O1 .TM1NVIN N b Q O QQ OI pmi N Vf m Q b N VI c c c c c c c c w c c C c c S C C c n/a n/a ea C C C C\ C C C C C i C C\ kt C Fy' C C' C §yr i C — C C C H0 OI N N $1851 $252 $185 5252 `"4'.s'tlr•-•,ak. ,'u. +.4°c....'::,`..1., -t '^r���. '�"' •`-'b.�3,.rw.. a�� "':aw.,..a',.r".' '"'t="°._;Pe r :"� 720 Medical Office/Clink 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf $0 50 5142 n/a 5229 5312 Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000 sf 50 50 5207 n/a_ $334 $455 0an OiO1OI ap p N N 5201 5274 $171 $233 e 44<#.M 1 1,5ii :.. , "z . s'$ ,,4_� KNV,W:_ ,» O,MVr I''Z*a;`s S " I - u,._. P'#: •�•s. $�..:, Vt'-'a-,-`r , «Efe :I. -r _ T.' 140 'Manufacturing f 1,000sf 1 50r 501 5631 n/al 51011 51371 ti NNN W NNSwlONO a.„ ,e14 2 NO: r„ , 0tibb NNm N NNN .n bb 5$551 CO VI00R in '7 00 N VI£ $244 5375 NbOi N bY N NutN N nfV Nr N Ib/1 .N -r N N b N p N N $477 5385'. $2961 $1,3651 n N N O n N VI n yy N NA .ni N pO p b N c0 b IbV m IQ(f W T N,`•:,' fit} r �y Nf O. .Ni ti N N .bi N N N \ c \ m [ A A C C A A C C A� . G C G Ci A c C \\\ c c c c c il c ei 4 \ } C[ 1 m A C n/a � c 'v 4 c 'L: -..:.i': .+ N an N N N N N 5279 $285 N b w Vf h m h p u1 b OI N b N Or m N � N p 00 N N h N M N Vf $728 529 1" ti . 0 $386 525 ONE Q N CO -k VD \ N Can n an r h , N 564 $747 N N N M o 0 NNNN 00 vol 0 l X 0100 N .0i1 .0i�vol .on 0006000000 >NNN T N an N N an an �o0 l 000 V, an roan o ./I 1`` 50 50 an -N an of o an 50 $0 �o�I an 1,000 sf 50 1,000 sf 50 .nh §§ 1,000 sf $0 1,000 sf $0 ��hhNNNNo-22a2i § 88 IL Nursing Home I bed I $0 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF) bed I 50 ,,, gig' 1 1,000 if 1 $01 acre j 50' court 501 boat berth 501 oDNN j §§ nC x0f 0f V0 0D agagN0 �.§§§8 > 1,000 sf service bay Mgr g fe ;Mtt, fir,. Day Care Center 1,000 sf Hospital 1,000 sf 1,000 sf screen student student student student 1,000 sf Bank/Savings Walk -In Bank/Savings Drive -In General Office Research & Development Center Retail Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash New/Used Auto Sales Restaurant Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru Supermarket 1 t 3 a o 2 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps Furniture Store ^ti � Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio County Park Tennis Court Marina It4AMWRAWWWWWIOARMANO-,11,At% 732 l Post Office Library Government Office Complex Warehousing Mini -Warehouse General Light Industrial Concrete Plant Sand Mining Veterinary Clinic * Church Movie Theater w/Matinee Elementary School (Private, K-5) Middle School (Private, 6-9) High School (Private, 9-12) University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) Fire Station mmn n �N.tm e/u e/u 011 CO gg�mmwii� 853 a7 �va I 491 420 590 733 vni om =Rim gg $3ln urvi vlo C 1"+Im 620 252 40 Appendix A m -. 1"::;,:i 4 E LL y li lIHlHHFHhIII 13- ^' N y�y NNNNNN p b eN9 tM11: _ �' ;' N N N O MVr N N M O $361 $3,744 e4 N N ii"11 'cr. �cr,vos $47 $4,877 tan e� 6 MNN N N N N ti a OD". . "y - N V O N N .N-1 OG N N ifj . 1VNN R i N' i N 4 "", N N N {�. Off tit,". r. N a SNiiiiii O O 00 N N ri N 1111111 111111 MUM N iiiiiiilli 11111' ,. ,y rc 5452 57,8871 57161 t N ffAVOYANW $3,8721 Iiiiiii I � 1` ......., ^ 5229 n/a $4,321 $334 n/a 56.298 61Z'9$ e/u 6517$ O8e1V$ e/u 164175 11 Y n/aI 52,862 n/a 52.287 '1 $5,8351 5387 I r 11 iiiiiii 1111C cvN C n/a n/a l 111111 w i Y e.ill %� � G; 501 $0 $220 n/a 5354 n/a $0 $0 n/a n/a _ $280 n/a N1111 o C1 ;,, ' y iiiiiiiiii iiiiiii (,.11 iiis Till .. IHIIHIIIIIUIIIii .y, C D V LL:; 7 1 - Yyy�Ra:A{:..II A. 1,000 sf 1 501 50 5142 n/a 1,000 sf $0 $0 $207 n/a, I I 1,000sf 1 501 $0 $125 n/a 1,000 sf 1 501 $0 $106 n/a 11111 .itidi 5296 n/a 5239 n/a 51841 n/a 5847 n/a I e/u 19625 05 - O$ Ie/u 11' 1'15 0$ 0$ 1,000 sf Sol $0l 1,000 sf $0 50 1,000 sf 50 50 111W,y O iiii :IF fp 11 I $n 501 50 50 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 <'1"111111 Sol Sol N $° $o $0 $0 NNN $01 $0 1,000 sfgla fuel pos. I- 11 000 sf 1,000 sf 1 1,000 sf service bay 1,000 sf 1,000 sf II _,+ 'Library I 1,000 sf Government Office Complex 1,000 sf Jail bed O N student student student student Y ��.. EE Q(� LL �' 720 I Medical office/Clinic 10,0005f or less 11 Medical ice/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 710 General Office 760 Research & Develo ment Center Manufacturing Warehousing Mini -Warehouse General Light Industrial Concrete Plant Retail Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash New/Used Auto Sales Restaurant Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru Supermarket Automobile Repair/Body Shop Self -Service Car Wash Convenience Market with Gas Pumps Furniture Store rtacquet two/mann Duo/Dance Studio County Park i Hospital Movie Theater w/Matinee ,i,a,x,iv,n (rr rva K, TlLJ University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) 11 e/u 1ntt Vi 1 A 6 E M �' W O S .i .N n OD Q N N b'q�`. n n ti; O N . sol .': n b dS+�iNNN OI pI N VI 01 O N SO N vi SO N NN P. f;; pp n - Q VI ' N N $�+ � N N n M N N N �{ M pO N Of N NN N W N fr(NNVY - M N N p N SO h1 N M g M O V O 01 N .:I. N N N Q N O V, Q n N p0 N M en N NN n N VI o. n �7,'(, VI i N 'i{.: OD !�N Q - N Q VN1 OI SD Q n N 01 ' O! Of VI b VL N n g n Of OD OI Ni Q .N {O N N .-1 VS �'p} W J A NN O! Cp Q Of n Q M N 11.7 N .. n .-1 n Q Ifl - ei N .. ‘s -,...1N 1.%4 Q O N n .eY N Q a{ .,..,:t N E I L I E O Q N L !J N ;NNNN . N }}' uN F N ? -.N CO m Affi 565 1 0 VI 0 V I N N I VS M. In n N l V.I. n N N N.- m m i N N N a N o1 N In M N NNN m m O N (0 m aa N NNN N CO m N N o O D N $62 $4 $73 n hn. m N 6' : n y' N CO a N ,.� N ' n M N n m N n N N •. N N N NNNN vI a N h n N N N n N' ; a N N VI M N N NN 5.1 m in NN b co N VIN N N n . M N ID M NN CO M n O 4", IN SO 01 OO NNN N SO b a a N ,N O SD N CO N VI a NN a n a N 01 n m 01 h N N N a lg•;. n N M Sp Vf N N N VI NNN m OO N d Z N VI d 0 N `! N N n SD M N N N M N SO SD O N FtX a VI a 10 NNN m a N O O O M, N SD N Nii, O N M N N • n NNN NF N N T N SD N N n m Of N CO .i N• N N N 1 n M* N CO N .M.1 N M N .NNN $3,916 510,136 521,570 $4,322 $3,582 N CO .N•1 T T N N .M-, N, n O W NN N a • N N p. N N CO`: 01 SND T N n NNN N N OM1 pap H d M N•1 N N m N T ANN m 01 N N n N COM N .•1 NN N a a fn 00 .-, N N n NNNN In O a a N 4 . .. -.-��'� ...- SD N n. NI Np n W -1 a vs. O01y1 N- N j$6,962 a VN 57,096 5225 5237 Pte•-'• "' N N N O O J'' Ont O ! M \\ C C 9 so0p ry l0 N N N \ C SUS N m N + !Nn N N ,aa AD` s N N 74o . \\ G .,«. O m to N N 01 O S D N N N \ \\}" o p dr{ SSD CO."•NNN •r n n SND N lO W N n . i N N N Wy 1.1 �' N CO CO N N N NNNN $3,732 $9,289 $20,459 54,066 52,934 $2,209 N a O P W J ri N w •• m N I1n JI W l0 S D N} N e/u e/u e/u e/u e/u A\\ C \\\\ C C C \\\ C C C G \ C \ C A \'\ C C C \ L C C C\ \ C C A 0 A \„t2................ C C CC C \ \ C C r. C Cu 0 a • C C''''a-'" A C 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In I 1,000 sf 50 $0 $279 n/a 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1 1,000 sf $0 $0 5285 n/a 710 General Office 1,000 sf $0 $0 5125 n/a C5y$ C L C is,C A{ H, C A C C C A C G C G 6 C C C C E � C A C C n/a n/a' n/a A C ' C C C C C C C EM • 00 o• N Z 0 L c Ot °O is, '.•-:'N n N N NN NN 3' n 7 O N %y. N NNN C: 1 760 Research & Development Center I 1,000 sf 1 501 $0 5106 140 'Manufacturing 1 1,000sf 1 $OI $01 $63 M W M N N SD a 00 N N VI } N N 1"yr xl” � SO Ol O1 M N N NNNN a n 00 a CO ,..INN N t0 n m VI Sb O N N NN W 0I N N n N ? M p •iN ., -f N .• N N Vl a 01 N? m N N m O N N � � •%. o N\ N C N a n N S. "• {� e n N N 564 $747 58 . $9 510 In O1 N N ^.0000 . SY. 000O 0$ 0$ N N N N N 0.00..0. N N N N N N N NN NN $0I $ $0 $0 NO O ON • O NNNN 501 501 501 $0 O NNN }..p.. pr: O O O O O A$ �97 ' • OOOOO N O N N N N O N N 540/S50 University/lunior College (7,500 or fewer students) student 501 50 n/a {Fire Station 1,000 sf 501 50 * Fffnrfivn ri,+n f•.. +1,e, 3,;11.....1 .1. %i .. t__... -ter!_!_ e_ _ _ . . _ •, •. L E `• O '. NNNN E O O Evv O 2 , • 0 NNN V,V S 1,000 sf $0 1,000 sf 50 1,000 sf $0 acre $0 O "N i N 'NNNN $0 $0 $0 $0 So o pp 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 1,000 sf service bay 1,000 sf 1,000 sf 430 Golf Course J hole 1,000 sf acre YO qy 732 'Post Office 1 1,000 sf I V U O N .•1� Vr Opv 1,000 sf screen student student student n C i=z 320 Motel 620 Nursing Home Assisted Care Living FacIli ACLF Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf Warehousing Mini -Warehouse General Light Industrial Concrete Plant n/a Sand Minin: Retail Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash New/Used Auto Sales Restaurant Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru Supermarket Automobile Repair/Body Shop Self -Service Car Wash ,Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 'Furniture Store Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio County Park Tennis Court Marina Library Government Office Complex 571 Jail * 565 Day Care Center 610 Hospital Veterinary Clinic * Church Movie Theater w/Matinee Elementary School (Private, K-5) Middle School (Private, 6-9) High School (Private, 9-12) v DIu xF7', M %da O N el e . .i O A C0I . IO O A Q cn t 841 932 934 850 942 947 853 492 412 N O OsI' OpT YI n pVI %Nn i DLL 530 5 U 42 Adoption of New Impact Fee Schedules For Non- residential Uses April 22, 2014 Board of County Commissioners Impact Fee History (Cont'd) • Entered into agreements: County/ each municipality County/School Board • Agreements cover responsibilities, administration fees for cities, schoolboard and county, notice regarding proposed changes Still in effect 4/22/2014 IO.A• I . Impact Fee History ▪ 1986 County -wide traffic impact fee adopted . 1997 Traffic impact fees updated(increased) . 2004 Traffic impact fees updated(increased) . 2005 Impact fee study approved, revised and added 8 non -traffic impact fees (including EMS/Fire, Law Enforcement,Education, Parks & Recreation) Impact Fee History (Cont'd) Three Fee Schedules Established • Unincorporated County . Fellsmere/ Orchid/Sebastian/ VeroBeach . Indian River Shores a L2.i Impact Fee History (Cont'd) . 2009 fee update approved, reduced most fee rates based on new data • 2009 & 2010 five impact fees suspended to stimulate building activity: EMS/Fire, Correction Facilities, Public Buildings, Law Enforcement, Solid Waste Reduced all fee categories REDUCTIONS IN TOTAL FEES 2005 TO PRESENT Land Use SF Home Retail Bank w/drive-in Manufacturing Unit 1500-2499sf 1,000sf 1,000sf 1,000sf Change (-11.84%) (-68.06%) (-54.26%) (-37.26%) 4/23/2014 Impact Fee History (Cont'd) . 2011- Present 3 fees suspended to stimulate building activity (Public Buildings, Correctional Facilities, Solid Waste) . Suspensions will remain in effect until new fee schedules are adopted Impact Fee Proportions Residential: Non- residential: Traffic + 50% Traffic: + 75% - 95% Schools + 20% Fire/ EMS: +2%-11% . Total impact fee revenues (varies): Residential provides major portion of total impact fee revenue • Traffic impact fee revenue essential component of ensuring growthpays for itself ¥L•2 . 2013 Tindale -Oliver hired to conduct update of all 9 impact fees (data, costs, credits) . Provide alternatives for reducing non- residential impact fees while maintaining LOS and minimizing/ avoiding residential impact fee increases . Tindale -Oliver issued January 2014 initial report and draft fee schedule General Methodology E Consumption -based fee calculated (same methodology since inception) E Affordable Growth methodology applied to calculated fee (reduced most fees) El Staff scenario recommendations appliedto 4 fee program areas: Emergency Services Public Buildings Parks and Recreation Libraries 4/2,3/2014 • January 22°a public workshop held • Updated impact fee data, variables (demands, costs, credits), and calculations presented • Affordable Growth methodology explained, staff scenario discussed • BCC generally accepted update and methodology Instructed staff to conduct on-the-road- workshops nthe-road- workshops (methodology and results) 10 E Affordable Growth Methodology • Based on projected future growthrate & available funding • Includes buy -down (subsidy) options • Can be targeted to reduce non-residential impact fees based on policy to stimulate economic development E Affordable Growth calculates a "buy -down curve" for each fee program area • Amount of buy down from calculated fee based on projected population growth • Factors -in improvements and revenues needed to maintain LOS Transportation Impact Fee o Affordable Growth Methodology • At 2%/yr. growth residential and non-residential traffic fees could be reducedl0% • At 2%/yr. growth reducing only non-residential fees reduces those traffic fees 55% - Keeps traffic fees for residential at calculated amount (no reduction) - 2% is BEBR high projection 4/2.x/2014 Transportation Impact Fee o Affordable Growth Methodology 10 00% 14 Affordable Growth e Apply 2% growth rate for traffic E Significant projects in next 5 years • 66th Ave. widen SR 60 to 491h St. - $15.4 million • 66'h Ave. widen 491h St. to 81" St. - $15.3 million • C.R. 510 widening - $29.4 million • 43rd Ave. 18th to 26th St. $16.4 million • Other projects (37sh St., 58th Ave./ SR 60) I . 4 Affordable Growth Li Apply 1.4% growth rate for all other areas [BEBR medium projections] o Corrections and Solid Waste go to $0 for all land uses, Law Enforcement unchanged Affordable Growth/Staff Scenario • Parks and Recreation reduce 25% beyond Affordable Growth reductions (all land uses: residential) - Intergenerational building, shooting range, and north county soccer lights • Libraries suspend entirely (reduce to $0) - No building expansions in next 5 years 4/2.$/2014 Affordable Growth/Staff Scenario E Exceptions to Affordable Growth fees: • EMS: adopt full calculated fee (no reductions) - Adding 2 new stations in next 5 years • Public Buildings reduce 50% beyond Affordable Growth reductions (all land uses) - Adding courtroom in next 5 years Unincorporated Schedule Total — All Fees .\ffnr"'It. Staff ^change Land O.e current GJailated GrowW S"."'" (from aIrrem) Study Date 2005/09 2011 201 2014 n/a Single Family (2K sf) 59,388 510,741 59,841 $8,623 -8.1"/0 Relaii 56,341 59,293 54,207 $4,392 -30.7% Bank (w/Ihivc-In) 515,401 516,815 57,598 $7,778 -49.5% Manufacturing 52,203 $2,095 5948 5988 -55.2°4 Current fee rates for educational facilities are included in SF total 20 O.'5 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 SCRIPPS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Sherri Cipriani, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ad Pub Customer Number Date Com/line PO # INDIAN RIVER CO PLANNING 2613607 4/7/2014 PUBLIC HEARING HEARING 4/22/14 Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, April 07, 2014, by �.�(7, who is Sherri Cipriani [X] personally known to me or [ ] who has produced as identification. 6ichael Merone +"pr."'•., MICHAEL MERONE e Notary Public - State of Florida 4 My Comm. Expires May 20, 2014 %,FBF ce Commission # OD 994177 4p- 4 do 4 .. -.1•. � 4 Notary Public Y.z2:1'1 K)1k1, NEWSPAPER E -Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES ORIGINAL Indian River County Planning Depa... Q) TTI Q) > M w N Ad Number: Z Z Insertion Number: Section-Page-Zone(s): BEFORE THE BOARD OF 0 TCPALM.COM CLASSIFIED 110110E NOTICE OF FETING The Indian River i ounwrylHospibl ,0 Co Com panzrtion on Commit. e Meeringg M"I 9:30a.m. at the Law OHIJ f D. HOffices 03Te AIA ]Sure Florida 32963. If a Person aeedecides y� publPd eeasehe cord of the rte Ili n' a and for s e purpose, ert/edne she elel cord a1 thebpomeed- ori md wni rte re ora inddd s en TIE ey E:'n/o Trio ni in 1111/Peal is to be Pub: April 7, 2014 TCN2614437 NOTICE BF ACTION NON NINETEEN. -ITA oC agwr INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ION ASETNO. 2013 CA 000739 ARGO BANK, ASSOCIATION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOP STRUCTURED AS. VES MORTGAGE IN, VESTMENTS IANC., MORT- GAGE FUNDING TRUST 2t06AP3. THA000GH CERTIFI- CES 2006-AP3' SERIES Ss. SASOMOM CRAMS AI IA SALOMON DeDAMS, et al fendants. NOTICE OF ACTION NOTICE OF ACRON 4440 TERRACE, D�3Al, FL ]]1ce YOU APE HEREBY lion toforeclose oD mel an m lion n9daealnr Ineon FwF iVER nun ln L'Cr es,kda oIAMONO LAKE sUBDIVI5ION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, As RECORDED IN PLAT BOoOK 18, PAGE 31, F THE PUDLIC PE- RIVO0 CO IN AN, trOR OA UN TY, been need train Tann ao se rvpy of your written SALOMON, CRAMS d ALISA CURE RESIDENT Unknown LDRESSKNOWN AD - 10056 NORTHWEST NOTICE th,fiction Hallinan. sP t"r p l'ai mill, venose ddresa is 2727 West Cypress Creek Road, ForLauderdale, FL t 9 nal file tL al 'tb Inn within f days a 'efr toelica i 3I this notice, either before te 304immediately adelnoeybe entered llaVe'd against you hl,Oo hall be ou`bl.hetl NanN ws sonce week for two "` tne DATED. 002426 Clerk of the Cine v ci�'k'oi inn dun 401 NOA e by `P wnh Di4.hlr: es. (0400.44.904 - son win a dsal.ty whomaed a. rileat entitled,are yad ,te pume Flee e aoA c pad. a7r 254 NW Count , Port St. Drive, Lucie il FL] 34986, (7]21 807' 370 et least s days before your ached NOTICE NOTICE OF ACTION once court medaah ud`IIi `. on"kl the before t scheduled a a'1 1);are aring or a t men II)ItApe,` il Pd) 216 TCN2613444 IN THE CIRCUR CNHE 03LLINT JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2013 CAS001537 NAGE G,NLSTARC, MDPT• lamt'If , JOCY ECOMDEN, Er Defendants. NOTICE OF ACTION Tt :),glowing De Ien'danrlsl'. JDDY L. COMOEN M20r"0 Vr::" wn Adaref.N: HIGHLAD VILLE, NC2HENDE819250N AddNlonpNEEWWVaORll Address : 1031 -T 34 EY, FL 3d65d 32 A1d 4521 nal Address: LOOP, NEW T RICHEY,EY, 3 46 4 - ] TH einCT,6) r" cN, FL 329 you ARE HEREBv NonefD ma an .e- da mr Fare amour. l Mang rte followingfollowingfollowingdes described FOI 5, 00000 0, TATE VEPO S. ULAKENIT ES - F, ACCORDING TO THE 00000000 IN PIAT BOON 0, PAGE 1116110 RECOVER0S IN OF INDIAN RIVER OUNTY, FLORIDA. 040 )965 96TH 71 ] gP0 BEACH FL as been filed ar againstyou and red too servers qui del of your written Dav Al Friedman, LAneVAN NESS y for the PlaArn- Ii%rf.s eddies CEN E. NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, SURE BEA DEER - FIELD BEACH, Fe May) 82014 :`dare ia`v 'enin. m >,oihnm'Irty I ublicativn VEi00 BEACH iPRE55 JOURNAL and file One orig Veil lark bl ro ener servicebefoore an Plaintiffs diell iaa.mnar nr eve ault'will h r inn :dr adman ea 'n the n com 4,1,1. vidart tiAdmi4iislra live Order No. 2065 WRYNESS my hantl Il e,nieir.t my E1 Mareh, 2016 P. SMITH LLERK 0l COUR0 Ittt oiler Clerk FN3166.13N5 NOA Requests for Accom- modations by Per Ons with Drsabili I:es. it ttu are aper- `anamnyac '21aapdnginam v Tartaurn :Z°:,1117 :,",°: Plea r Aam„ 250 NW Cou 1,Club Drive, Surto 21, Port t qoo7Lucie, 772- 007-.70 at toast 7 The SI. Johns River Water Management en District (District] gi a moe04elat he following er;PPlic 4ions . ERE Permit Apwie.lions 0E(4430ons Holding CF/E-.3‘-g6 ,LLC, PO Box Vero Beaci,, T e project is le n AIN Indian The ct is Io- doted in Indian 31 Sr County,N^61°10 39 17, Township: 31 2 acresft East and includes ).52 acres. The Envi- ro al Resource Penni( application m"^m`ine ppnsvanrvn al a st niwmea kn0 e Reflenions Amsted Llv�ng Facility. The fiecontainingm alp lice - lar available for einsr n Mon d y1 h are Friday, except for inspection District [olid yy t S p. a h Dos- ,` d44 m r0. 6x9 Peid SL, P,I- les FL one of 519. YBu may Service ▪ view ties a[ one pr ho District's S rvice Center but you should call Service Cerner staff n advance tonukesure that the Nies are et specific . Ser Center contact information is voidable a i rte at Iloid m/c- lolli a .htion le ao rnents s permitedonlin nfile iFv°eaa n b ing]index.ntml. To bra - information' n how o fine end obtain li on file documents, g erehe ELP ab in E -Permitting dna plick p""4FADS antl h n IDI- epw ind eine vymed ;,nada Haw to land chnrvae li6aul4n'III . Pdocul The dec Sion whmadm i a`gpnca n feet filed with (received Chief, Bureau Ie ulamul9�rpore, P.O. Bax 1419, Palatka, FL 321i 429, r by e-mail a plic n - nodi rmnE i e y of rhe Plea include either the ct `t Appel `n umber Or the Project Name n the eioh- receive b- 0isde e06,010 0 0O n`ppli 01 " m aevv4B:ada reive actual aril liar ehnse whe ual n ebe U.S. rsDail, the yie`e r` mail n woo dirt `dn rhe wh= R17,1'1„°°.'"er r n ale provided by 1.. mail 0 mei. • ed. apply 'substantial chicon/on' c a statementten eieode to theDis` jector. conc.,. hydrolog environmental impacts of the 'seedy vhat identifies , 11 ind'o ea to ee melly'subst ial o re- iameyou,em.np au substantial. `�i>o Sion on the permit application.d tl deci- You ad a1 y n IN o' w plication. 'f Y h ow d h permit e application. i p requestou make a 5vrit- ten o the District foradditional inforatyin t rroar iF%' '0 ' da a permit nimy •t pobta the ailable - f,r"ptrI hant r ,. duneddnote (hat l ling a writ - el at dei cFlariea slam ., idm TITS- ve hearing. Oe II bP who have requested° individual in- tended ( uest t dr Distr. I Decision I b db h of a cn'a0 alit fc rye - d I04,041dOstr 01 00. cision isg•na md. B Margaret Daniels,BUresau Cbiaf Od R o.sa supaitr0 ent Die Str John Rive Wata M 9 Reid Street Palatka, FL 321])-2529 13861 3194570 Pub: April 7.2a. TC10614440 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUR IN ANO FOR INDIAN wVEP COUNTY, FLORIOA CIVIL ACTION 216aOW3te SENO.: NC BANK, NATION- AL ASSOCIATION, UNKNOWN HEIRS OF THE ESTATE OF BETTY F. BENSON, ONOTICE OF ACTION FORECLOSURE "PgN UNKNOWN HELPS OF STATE OF BETTY F. BENSON ADD PEsS NOWN ADDRESS ID ESS NOT AP• PLIABLE Residence unknown living, includ- ing a unknown ° any the paler. dant, ifremarried n ae.a, aver he" denkna ORDINANCES 8 PETITIONS g endrees, lli 9nees, r air Ore. , and II e othetrustees, and ,R claim- ing through, li n- eE oeieirden and eehia mlea °de den. e lrZe' "l' en' den and such of a Defer) ear may be in otll`wee not s YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that an as 1 o foreclose a loow °nre`descrllt CONDOMINIUM UNIT NOTICE OF ACTION Court this 28th day of March, 2014 J.R. SKARN Clerk of the Court Indian River Aoy a By, J. Anderson As Deputy Clerk A13L)443 NO Pe Guests lO4 A sons w'rn o bT- No. 01, OF 5UT- MGN00OlE EOBT MG TO THE DELLA RATION OF CONDO MINIUM THEREOF RECORDED IN 900 C1AL RECORD$ BOOK t PAGE 3014. OF THE PUB - UC RECORDS OF IN- DIAN RIVER COU, TY, FLORIDA: TT ETHER WITH AN 00/01040 SHAPE IN COMMON ELE- MENTS APPURTE- Na Nr OH0RETO. v ly known u' 1554 16TH VE APT 101, VERO EACH, FL 32960 This anion has been :dud ""n"a.wnod yov are I yf i34440.0 deleth6 Plaint OAl attorney, FLORIDA fORELLO- SUPE ATTORNEYS. ddress 40 001 Cie .1,42 1 SuiVel and *108,Street, Suite 681 93165, Clearwater. Fe ]S5, o before 30 t publication, Isar axle firs ublica ies. If you rvieoll ceder'„n `v ornmodal only r his eproceeding re entitled, at no you ost you,to the ovision of Pertain istin Cour CIub50 Nye sur , Pvn S[. Lade FL, at least 7 days before your scheduled co edi- ap- pethis arance, upon elf me time belvo the scheduled aPPear awe les it you z ehear in Trail ole int lln'"'nl TCN36�d]10 ]P 216, dune I I,Mhe ' ieh the Court either ha e (her bomr lain Leel Yet called NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE IN THE CMCUN COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR INDIAN PNEP COUMY, FLORIDA 31.2012-C x0180 S. BANK NATION AL ASSOCIATION, v. PlanuX, LAUREN M. PITT, LAN 05 PROPERTY ASSOCIATION, INC, FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORA• TION, NONCEOF FORECIOSUPE SALE NOTICE Is hereby tie will be” reed a°l ei Complaint. o [ mplainl. W ntlNtha • al of eh i ORDINANCES A PETITIONS tver ealloreclodeb- IR MONDAY, APRIL 7. 2014 • SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS ' 11 NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE 850-46,1500 8604csimile 62-1599 Requestsloe Accorn m dot h ,sabilr- a`IIYiu ahgry whowi n .'E`ds n mad ti entities), at the aro cnOu NW ntistratio Club Drive, [vue 1), Part SI. inti Rio x986, nz Leveuiedne ePearance, or moed; before a nail rte sn bedoo the once is l a ea - ess than 7 days; it You are hemr- "g ocall )31. Ply, March , April 7,2014 T..2611122 dance offer fee sale a. sell aI pub0lic vu y hi nerl sh,be 1.4 lu for esn, the following described bee Prainr'liver 60` ni Fmie,,(044;0 ° y. T 16, BLOCK 110. •PROLAN BEACH IT H. LANDS UNIT S. ACCOPLAT THEREOF OF THE PLAT THEREOF RE - o00 IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 56, PUBLIC RECOPI CO INDIAN PIA COUNTY, FLORIDA tN THE CIRCUIT COURTOFT E 9TH JU01[IAL CIRCUR, IN AND FOR INDIAN PNEP COUNTY, FLORIDA DIVISION, 2013 A 0 a 28 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE, ASS. CIATION, PlanbX, 91NNIE C. PLATT; MINOR J PLATT, R.: UNKNOWN 700000, IN SUBJECT PROPER- TY, ROPER- oDefendants. PONY PRE 55. 5 Hieland Drive SW, Vero Beach. FL 32962 Final pg114 'ge !o edvsure is is ra`804 0 me rbes`olndh"h is Any person cclaiming pia "teh eaal7°, lamer than me TE°`e ToiEn"e Pendens must pl 11014] within 60 file after the sale. SUBMITTED on Of day al March. iota, SIPOTE B PERMLT4 Kathryn(. Kasen FL Bar/62116e Alwrney lar Plainnfl Sho11N Permute PC it 15 E. Gomel. Pensacola, FL MI Telephone: ORDINANCES & PETITIONS NOTICE OF iORECLOSUPE SALE NOTICE IS HERE. GIVEN inal Judgment of Floreclosure dated m day e e 2013 CA 000528,`of the me Lige„ Court ea clad BEFORE TWDIAN 1000CUN30 000OIOSIONEPS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN that the Board of Cou ury Cvlmmissi e sof Indian mer County. Flyntla anal( held G e1rder• endene TAe K,Imp nF Ito eode2, 20. at 9,00 Caunry, at its regular meeting on mattety, Apr 1 a e n thereafter s me maser may be Weare, in a m, or as Soo al tie Lo y AdPlinidlration Bl oft A, ropose o 1801 ordinance a Verou BeacM1, an a. The Ute a red ordinance iz azrltllpws. ON ORDINANCE O1 THE 80200 OF COUNTY COMMISSI0NEPs OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE K, IM- PACT FEE, OF THE 000E OF INDIAN RIVER CUNTY, TO AO APPRND OVEENEWC IMPACT PEE DSC SCHEDULES FOR NC,RESIDEN: TIAL USES FOR THE UNINCORPORATED INDIAN PNER COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITIES PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE FOR NEW IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES: AND PROVIDING FOR IFI TION AND SEVERABILITY. Sad ordnance 0 .doped, 44(1 eatabl h I F 5 d ulna for ted c emd parker N Raememidi E s;rdarai n ln` ems wall re tnioilmr.a�c t1 g"` seE4ia taF< he 6/50014. For NeJail and Velnnnhary CIme impart liar eIn ma[ will be increasing. the proposed OWN,. date will 641001201k A copy of Ne p4opased ordnance a I PI D ' n X ce located a[ the County Ad ' ' P Id 1 1 m d V dB db A Xa altt p b A g hat-hatim record of hwhich' Id ny d 'd wh nbid ties e appear et h meeting be heard with respectON e a P e direct planning -related questions to the MPO section at 226 Anyone w6 reds tial accommodation for us con a (1]31 2261213,1 0001 ]]1-300.521s18t10,0123 (144(0 0 advance ohne meeting. Pub: April 7, 2014 Indian River Caunry Bompvl County Commissioners By: -p eler O.OBryan, Chairman TCN261360] Circuit In end nr Int den River Lounry, Florida, wherein MORTGAGE. NATIONAL MORTGAGE,ASSO NOTICE 110 FORECLOSURE PNC BANK, NATION- AL ASSOCIATION, Plarnb0. GEFFRARD, JAC. CIANO* is me Haim BONNIE C. PLATT; MINOR J. KNOWN 1TENANT ISI, IN POSSESSION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ora de� len r:' -c The CIer4 sell h0 the higfesi endbast bidder fo casor electronically a[ aw.lndran-Rey ls8a se.com in WiRorld t Statutes ation '1000 AM 0.1 x003 TILE OFSALE UANT TO CHAPTER 45 NOTICE IS GIVENPurHEREBY Pursuant to e Final Judgment of Foreclosure dated andember 1 , 1013. 2013ared m ase CA 000316 n the Idth day vt April, geld, the (vl- lowing de scla lank 7:7id flln.l JiOud99mentlovnt CT 136, L0S0THE NORTH 50 FRET THEREOF, FElBFlS- PLAT OF HE PANY FARMS COM- 01 0 SUB 35 00, OF All UN3DR- VEYED PART OF TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, AS RECORD- ED IN PIAT BOOK 3, PAGES 1 AND 2, O- THE PUBLIC PE - CORDS OF ST. LU - CIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA; SAID LANDS NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ANYINGA90050NINTEREST0 LLAIM. N.THAU ANY. OTHER THAN THE PROPERTY OWNED As OF THE DATE F THE ST PENDENS MILE A CLAIM WIT, IN 60 DAYS AFTER THE SALE. did enthnllit- lar Indian River elictr1 Florida 1 w ch PN BaFk Na. en`.ra'Iioi I0.o0 Commissioners"ol Indian River Coun[Y, a Political Sub sion of the Slate Of Florida, Genoa Gel. bard, Jacques Gel. rd, ki'TeltifErn also own a4 Fanpra Dv - County Clerk CountyCircu101 me Clerk I me I will the n gn s .0(40badnee,ilelw'aan ` alloy close ,l did River Cnry. dlor A itla IhF et4, dr. 4110440,9 described property r Ivnh in sal Final Judgment o Foreclosure: OT 6, BLOCK D. OSLO PARK,UNIT NO e ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TDUBPEC0ORT EINLA PT O0L 4. PAGE RECORDS OF IN011- N RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.. 136 22RO Y esOX°Cil SW, FL Any alai ing plus I.om end .all i1 ,dens must file a claim within 60 days aM1e4 the sale. Dated in Hillsborough "luso lkitFA airy a Marcn 2014 Is] Elk Del'Et lie I nk Dentele, Esq FL Bark )16)5 TA1elhenelli L aw 1Byt10 P 80mazFL4]33 2in] Service: eryLtiff ry/Haw...dli Br:0'173,2E01 NOS Request," s yccBom Di ,bili NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE Bao Raton FL 33486 Tele561-33841 1 Fax K: 56133E -6o7] Jessica Sem 653rd] Email: 76NOSl'll" Pete I A P s6 cornlliihua a Pity kW. needs any a madly n in or ng'you oPravIslonol 'th ce n`Ctu' Plea Atl NE rtei S31. ev 0. 96,1 01. suis zn. Pan 51. 0743 L0 34986, AP 0 at least ] days e you scheduled cowl .14 early ` ving this notifirvtion il the NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE mediately upon nil tm`ifiba- lore the0 Ischeduled eheaan0 o4ifv impaired, p]all' Pub20xce T,CN26t389z es. Iryou geese peT- wineds yac- wnv ac- commodation this dVnrco'sletrirtied, a provision ofucer Hassistence. Aa ase 250 ,1 6 i,eerY11]IUPtFI St. 101.4 13 87 (. 0)2- ]-63]0 a Ieas1 ) `eye before your heduled eouap- pearance, ' peal ante or immedi atethis notificatiion it the lielor0e e' x - e anon isl le less than e drys it You are hear i°d, or ni` is Pub: Apnl 0 5,211 TCN361J828 IN THE MOIR 01000 COURT OF THE NINETEEMH JUDICIAL N IN AND FORR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDAA 2013 A02EIG FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSO- PlaA1101N, ALBERT G VALDES, RASE PROP -PTY OWNERS AS- SOCIATION, INC: 001(0]G0 POSSES- SIONband662,and PLL OTHER UN e MOWN PARTIES, oefen'aa,1la. FOPECLOSU"E NOTICE Er SALE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVFinnEal°Srsuant u un.)Fry fare - OS, 2 elated Marto OS, 10 entered Civil CassNo.,20e No.. 13 A 001341 of the Ci0 ni10 3 3e"a1 Circuit and for Int dianRiver County, Florida, wherein FEDERAL NATIONAL MCPTGAGE ASSD- 3 ALBERT Plainer ll, BERTVALDES: OAK G. CHASE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIA ted Inial 19 day of oMeBy: Tend. By. Jennifer Nicole Bar Number 99192 Submitted f Lew Office of of Legal Group. 1800 NW 49th Street surae 1 0 Fo LavdndMe, FL 3 09 12 10141052EED.0365 PRMARI Y FOR SERVICE A L FL PURSUANT TO FIA. eservOe12 2516 de�lgB7 � cvm Nw`irh`Dasati Iqi s'"I( u: aneb'rPir °y dnids dare. Fed`v ynEigle& d aa t no cost I ' PI c ADA s Nw eSvua3a'1e20OS : 1]]31807-43]0 ,i least ] days before yappearance. our scheduled noun F A h Halappearance is Ie than 7 e ry Put x08, n tx, Apr l ],2014 TCN2611209 (COUNT OF THE NINETEEMH JUDICIAL RINDIA, IN AND FOR INDIAN PNEP COUNTY, FLORIDA ASE No 2012.00044 BANK OF AMERICA, .A., SUCCESSOR BAC HO EELOANSGER SERV- ICING, LP, PLAINTIFF, V5. SHAUN E. BROWN , 100000ANT140 NOTICE OF ALE NOOTI CE IS HE REB TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to I Foreclosure Judgment June 24,(2013 the have anion, the In- dian River County Clerk of Court will 1511101100U1 i OF THE "133`L CIRCUIT IN AND FOP RUNTY, FLORIDA 500111 RIVER C CIVIL ACTIO E NO 2013 Clvlsl*N: bidderloeedt eM d.n River, Florida, vn April 22, 2014, a Oat nd Tan AM,, 0.114,,41 BY.,1J i N.ia rm `for rhe IGF 914Bar v.. lowing described 0298 Oi0103 THE LAKES AT SANDRIDGE PHASE L PD AS PER PLAT THEREOF, RE- CORDED IN PLAT 1701 West Hillsboro BOOK 18, PAGE 40 Boulevard THROUGH F Sutedo0 THE PUBLIC RE• Deerfield Beach, FL ORDS OF INDIAN 334.12 RIVER COUNTY, Telephone: FLORIDA. ,121,1,3r, 9020 Ano n end k 1(33]/300 N01 W lrome'ntM1anl uR NB P d dens file Lid. within sirvy .81.,dC e 1h of the sale Penlarge Notice of IN THE CCOURTOFCTHE NINETEENTH JUND ALRINDIA IN N FOR INDIAN RN COUNTY, FL CAPITA cNIL ACTION 20131300 NO PNC BANK, NATION- AL ASSOGATION, Plainutt K`ArHY L. 00VET7 A/K/A KATHY L. Defendants, are De lendan[a. J P rhe SMITH,ctheLourt Clerl of umt www.will • II to the Fdgb s bidder lar t sM1 male 0'30111, tI a1. NONCE OF SALE Notice is n<rehy etnmFinal JudAm d of inCivil Case z cao On3lair"Inddanire vu yy FloriAa, NATIONAL NATIONAL DANK, ASSO- CIATION is Plain II, antl KAV FK A BOVETT I KATHY L O'NEILL, et a1., , e me Derem s� Indian Prvar nlwill Is ;I he 0(0(20, Porida,ddeserved as: LOBLOCK G. IRE TREE p API(, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE THETHE E COFFICE THECE CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RECD" 3 - EO IN PL39 BSOA 0 E LYINGBANID BEING RN INDIAN RIVE" OUNN, FLORIDA Puhlre ease. m me g a d bib M1nfor cash, e 4eallorecl0se.com, FL, at1000 AM,he 2nd of lo'wi'ng desand4ele loin inPer'yd8Fin al summary`Judgmenl, ET17, OAK CHASE SUBDIVISION - PHASEI,ACCORD- ING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORD. ED IN PLAT BOOK PAGES 77, ]]A 1(00 UGH ])C. 8 TONE PUBLIC IAN RDS OF INDIAN RIVED COUNTY. FLORIDA. fdalrniflrglafun 'x91:1"4 0,00 AM,oon t nd day 1 April orn the el sale, i An other than the Ease of Irh Es els enden at file claim sale. im mos, within O days • er the Ie. Dara: Marcn 6, z01d FOPEttOSU ATiOPNEVS, PILL " Enk T.Silwir, Enk01 0l 020481 Esquire ITec nolo 4955 Technology Way. suns 500 Boca Patin, 44 33431 17371 4404876 mailservice®NaPlcc orn NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE Northern Trvst Com Trust, LaOkla `Norrthen Trust Northernrn Trust Bank of Flon- da.Williams ane 24341 4 01s4 are aenaantl sl. the Jeffre IC y R. Smith. will sell to e highest and bestnbidder for 0:20egin Ninn 99 t t 1<,Mhe fallow 20 des set f ora in mon tl Final Jud9m nI, term LOT 4,ING'S HIGHLANDSBLOCK . ALA THEREOF.TAS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK a, PAGE 9o, CF THE ORDSBRE- CORDS CN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA INCANY ON CLAIM - PANS INTEREST IN THE SURPLUS 0A0,.7 THE PROPERTY OWNER AS OF THE PENDENS ME EUSIT FILE A CLAIM WITH. IN 60 DAYS AFTER THE SALE. Dlwern,' Zola 7 •ur ASI dmin. PlaiinlHll°,1 colulnsel hereby designates its dram a(oi rhe aOUrl a rve day of 102648 NS modeNOAccam- e l ts fe by ber- wou Dia 'ai .rll you are v pn- wim eisabdm cede an mu't4s ePraT eeainpEy lo you, tlhe provision certain Zing til on, 150 NE Svu rY Cuh Oliv 210. 03 SI. ducie, FL, 'MVP; 0]63)0 leas ] TcF ay duledbelV070a Ttel oath! " nif eh scheduled o end apnea, les an o it you are hear - ' ear Pim- paired, A T iCN26141> Astor los I t ra eEnt' Blryn"lYPo Po 4i 5 Router. PA 1M1 eaangetl li a of hria nail re p ehetl a pvdaea herein. Gladstone Law Group. PA Me4ng fprPalPlmambffe W. Oo Park Read: $uite ]t0 h a P ;:=114° entitled, a sl Please c Cane Johnson, ADA Ctory tlinter, 50 NW Suite2 Club Drive, 11. Pon se. 01 d 86, leant) doedb 4000 your aranculeorco; . •Ppearance, IN THE CIRCUIT CNINET NINETEENTH JUDICIAL ortcurr IN AND FOR INDIAN PNEP COUNTY, CIVIL DIBDIVISIONON ]OI3ACWr00fe B. The Northern Trust em Trust Pk, Non Glron Tru t Bank o Plaintiff. Danny Williams: The Unknown SO.. UDVams,enwnF. ties in Pardn, If liv Pad .11 Unknown claim bntwl eallyadov k d'Par Birdgra' rvairn an interest as Spouse. Heirs,Devi- known i - known Paa tI in Possession2f lie Unknown under mdDm.h<n'ahlnisd rotg d un whether SEGTamE`S 5 PIROO A.. n e LLP r i$ nn Faeeml Brea Pamn, Flo: da 1561 ieletah 00 Fax. 15611 998,6702 Email: lugeOcHmgs. Luciana B9ane, 25x32 o�a'cdude Fairnivnf aracicee You are advised cthat lay this offideemed a debt 6` Ilec endoble ne3o ry be used lar Inas Pe quesr� for Accam- mo cdate: M1 rte hs her ll YDia newtwho s any t pe n Ini4 eeatlg =,1U°:(n'Cwn Admi t 50 NE SulerlylW Driv Lucie. FL, x966,'] 807-6370 at least ] scbetlubedore „our lfi: uoutU th ime b ric. e<<:auli<seinen'hiei ry4 EI`Yvu veeM1eA1- it droll )tt. I Pub: April T'CN36rdo62 known P may claim an interest H Spouse, Heirs, Devi - °F rh Other aimants fenda41(0 SALE 501)10110 FHEREBY GNEN CE Pursuant Final JudCIV C s No.ne 2010CA-000088 of the Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit in and for In- a dian 'iv eau Flvritl , woe in iM1e IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR WDWN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDACASE NO - GENERAL JURISDIC- TION ONISION NC BANK, NATION - PAL ASSOCIATION, S UCCESSBP AY MERGER TO N TIONAL CITU BANK, PlainrrX, TISH E. HUOGE NS: KNOWNK, N : N TFNANL t UNKNOSW sr,,,ANT ]IN POSSESSION, Oeledants, NOTICE OF SALE NOTICE IS c GIVEN dance with neat of Fere- at d MarcF S,o2O1 a, 'm the ,boyo of ehv `Court wi;l ell to me hi es nd hese bidder cash Bn April 1z, 3rx ale 1wH•inddie a.m, at e llsreelose tom- Gibed 440074. zLL THAT cERrAIN ALANO SITUATE IN INDIAN FIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Al2F0 YTPOIN THE NOPTN LSNE OF 34. T ECTION oWrvsHlP 33 SOUTH, PANGS 39 EAST LAST GEN- ERAL TO THE LAST CON` -PAL PLAT LAND, OF INDIAN PARR FARMS SON, Y SUBDIVISION, RECORDEDDED 9 IN PLA, BOOK 3 PAGE 36, if ToEwaE SAID LANDS BEIN NOW WES 6do`a THE NORTHEAST COFRNER OF SAID TRACT ti THENCE CONTINUE WEST 80 FEET TO THE POINT THENCE SOUTH 32100 FEET TO N<ECORNER, E PARALLEL TO THE SORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 04 A DISTANCE OFC FEET TO A CORNRN ERR , a.a°I INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM PUBLIC HEARING LDR AMENDMENT (LEGISLATIVE) TO: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Stan Boling, AICP• C unity Development Director FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney DATE: April 7, 2014 SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment of Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Section 973.04, Section 973.06, and County Code Section 403.08 for Nuisance Abatement Special Assessment It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 22, 2014. BACKGROUND On October 22, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") requested the County Attorney's Office to research the feasibility of a nuisance abatement special assessment. After a presentation from the County Attorney's Office on December 3, 2013, the Board directed the County Attorney's Office to draft a nuisance abatement special assessment ordinance utilizing the uniform method for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non -ad valorem assessments as set forth in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. This memorandum 1) points out how the nuisance abatement special assessment is used in other jurisdictions, 2) explains the tax deed sale process, and 3) describes the attached nuisance abatement special assessment ordinance (the "Ordinance"). The proposed ordinance will amend Chapter 403 of the County Code (not a part of the land development regulations), and Chapter 973 of the land development regulations (LDRs). Because the ordinance amends a portion of the LDRs, Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) consideration was required. At its regular meeting of March 27, 2014, the PZC considered the proposed ordinance. After a lengthy discussion about the potential expansion of the County's use of the nuisance abatement procedure, about the use of the tax roll and "threat" of tax deed sale to recover abatement costs, and about the current reliance on tax payers in general to bear the cost of most nuisance abatement actions, the PZC voted 3-3 on a motion to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance (see attachment #3). Because the motion to recommend approval did not have 4 or more votes, the motion did not carry. Consequently, the PZC's action is treated as a recommendation to not approve the proposed ordinance. F:\Community Development\CurDev\BCC\2014 BCC\Nuisan.Abatement.doc 43 Impact Fee Comparisons "Single Family (2,000 sq. ft.) Retail (1,000 sq. ft.) Bank w/drive-In (1,000 sq. ft.) Manufacturing (1,000 sq. ft.) Indian Brevard St. Lucie Slartin River $8,623 9,187 $13,175 $7,318 $4,392 $5,637 $3,875 $6,795 $7,778 $23,517 $3,875 $7,956 $988 n/a $580 $1,346 co March 11th staff reported to BCC • Positive feedback at workshops, urged to reduce non-residential fees soon • Commercial developers urged quick adoption of reduced non-residential fees • Staff recommended and BCC authorized bifurcating non-residential and residential fee changes v 4/21/2014 E February and March staff conducted8 road show workshops with interested groups and organizations (included Fellsmere and Sebastian) e Information posted on County website 22 o Staff coordinated with Consultant and County Attorney • Drafted 3 schedules for non-residential impact fees • Drafted adoption ordinance, keeps in place current residential fees (with 3 fees suspended) until new residential fees adopted • Effective dates: May 5 for reductions; October 1 for increases (jail, veterinary clinic) 24 Going Forward E Adopt new non-residential schedules E Hold second public workshop (TBD) • school impact fees • implementation issues • New residential fees • Adopt new residential fees, complete fee schedules E Adopt impact fee ordinance changes 2 4/23/2014 Recommendation Staff recommends that the BCC adopt the proposed ordinance and attached schedules for non-residential impact fees 41 The BCC is now to consider the proposed ordinance and is to approve, approve with changes, or deny the proposed ordinance. ANALYSIS • Nuisance Abatement Special Assessments In Other Jurisdictions The County Attorney's Office found that Palm Beach County, St. Lucie County and Polk County have adopted nuisance abatement special assessment ordinances. In 2008, Polk County adopted its Property Maintenance Ordinance which established the process of abating nuisances with Polk County being reimbursed through the uniform method for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non -ad valorem assessments as set forth in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. The types of nuisances abated under Polk's program include the open storage of junk or debris, organic debris in excess of six cubic yards, overgrown grass and/or weeds, storage of distressed or abandoned vehicles and unsecured pools. In 2010, the population in the unincorporated portions of Polk County was approximately 370,000 people compared to Indian River County's 2010 unincorporated area population of 91,366. Polk's nuisance abatement roll for 2014-2015 will include roughly 440 properties. The process in Polk County begins with an investigation of a violation. If it is determined that there is a violation, the property owner is notified by mail and posting on the property and given ten days to correct the violation. The property owner has an opportunity to file an appeal of the violation determination at this stage. Upon expiration of the correction period, the property is then re- inspected. If it is found that the violation has not been corrected, then the nuisance is abated by Polk County (usually by a vendor/contractor hired by Polk), with the cost of abating the nuisance, including all administrative and operating fees assessed against the property as an assessment under Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. Randy Mink of the Polk County Attorney's Office explained that the assessment includes the costs for the code enforcement officer site visits and the bill from the vendor (contractor) who performed the abatement. The property owner is then notified that the nuisance was abated and given ninety days to pay the assessment or appeal to the Polk County Code Enforcement Special Magistrate. If the property owner does not pay in time or appeal the amount of the assessment, the cost is recorded as an assessment and established as a first lien, equal to a lien for nonpayment of property taxes. If an appeal is requested, the only issue on appeal is the total actual costs incurred by Polk County. If the assessment is not paid within thirty days after Polk County mails the notice of the assessment, the County records a claim of lien for assessment. The lien accrues from date of abatement at an interest rate equal to the amount of interest payable on a judgment lien pursuant to Section 55.03, Florida Statutes, until the costs of abatement are placed on the non -ad valorem assessment roll. In 2012, both Palm Beach County and St. Lucie County adopted similar processes of using the uniform method for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non -ad valorem assessments for abating nuisances. However, Palm Beach County and St. Lucie County do not utilize the process for abandoned vehicles. St. Lucie County utilized this process in 2013 for approximately six properties. St. Lucie County is currently establishing the procedures to collect the assessment for these properties on its tax roll. F:\Community Development \CnrDev\BCC\2014 BCC\NuisanceAbatementdoc 2 44 • The Tax Deed Sale Process At the October 22, 2013 meeting, the Board raised the concern that if the abatement costs were recovered through the non -ad valorem assessment process and the taxes and assessments are not paid then years could pass before the County is reimbursed while the property goes through the tax deed sale process. If a property owner does not pay his or her taxes and assessments by March 31St the taxes and assessments are considered delinquent and a 3% penalty is added on April 1St. If the taxes and assessments remain unpaid on May 1St, the parcel must be advertised in the newspaper and an advertising fee is added. If the taxes and assessments remain unpaid, the Indian River County Tax Collector's Office will sell a tax certificate by the end of May. If the tax certificate is sold, then the taxes and assessments owed to the County will be paid to the County. If there is no buyer for the tax certificate, then the tax certificate will be struck to the County, which means that the tax certificate is held by the County and the taxes and assessments remain unpaid. Unless the tax certificate is for homestead property and the value of the certificate, plus interest, does not exceed $250, then the tax certificate will be available to be purchased by potential buyers. If the tax certificate is purchased, the County will be paid the County taxes and assessments. If the tax certificate is not redeemed by the property owner, then two years from the date of delinquency, the property will be eligible for a tax deed application. The tax deed sale process can take up to a year. If no party buys the tax deed and it is held by an individual then the individual will obtain the property for his or her base bid. The base bid includes the payment of the County taxes and assessments. If the sale is a County tax deed, and no party buys the tax deed, the property will be placed on the list of lands available. The property will remain on the list of lands available for three years from the date of the tax deed sale. If the property is purchased from the list of lands available, then the County will be paid the County taxes and assessments. If the property is not purchased, then the property will escheat to the County and all of the County taxes and assessments will be eliminated. This entire process from when the tax certificate is issued until the property escheats to the County can take up to ten to eleven years. Randy Mink from the Polk County Attorney's Office stated that almost all of the nuisance abatement liens in Polk County are paid either through the payment of the assessment before the assessment is added as a tax roll assessment under Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes or through the payment of the taxes and assessment on the property before the taxes and assessments become delinquent on April 1St • The Proposed Indian River County Ordinance As noted above, the Board directed the County Attorney's Office to draft a nuisance abatement special assessment ordinance utilizing the uniform method for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non -ad valorem assessments as set forth in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. The Board requested that any such assessment require the approval of a supermajority of the Board. Finally, the Board requested that the nuisance abatement special assessment ordinance be drafted in such a way as to minimize any necessary changes to the Indian River County Code of Ordinances. F:\Community Development \CurDev\BCC\2014 BCCW uisanceAbatemcnt.doc 3 45 Based upon the Board direction the County Attorney's Office drafted the attached Ordinance. As structured, the Ordinance requires a supermajority vote of the Board to approve the nuisance abatement action and a separate supermajority vote to allow for the levy, collection, and enforcement of a non -ad valorem assessment as set forth in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. Additionally, the Ordinance allows for the use of Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes for building demolitions as well as nuisance abatement. Finally, with respect to an assessment that is over $500, the Ordinance allows the Board to divide the assessment over multiple years so that the property owner will not be required to pay a large assessment in one lump payment. If adopted, the Ordinance will expand the ability of the County to recoup its costs for the County's abatement efforts of nuisances and demolitions. Currently, the County solely uses the method of recording a lien on the subject property. However, the County has been limited in its ability to collect on such liens. Pursuant to Section 162.09, Florida Statutes, no code enforcement lien may be foreclosed on real property that is a homestead. Second, the County's liens are often wiped out in foreclosure suits. However, the Ordinance, if adopted, will allow the County to collect the assessment through the annual real estate tax bill. Thus, this Ordinance will establish an effective means of recouping the County's costs for demolitions and nuisance abatement. There may be concerns that such a mechanism will lead to the County being too active in nuisance abatement and demolitions, however, Section 973.04 of the Indian River County Code of Ordinances still states that fines imposed by the code enforcement board will remain "the primary method for bringing code violators into compliance." As indicated in the attached memo from staff, since 2009 the total number of building demolitions was 34 and there were only 2 nuisance abatement cases. Therefore, unless the Board changes its current practice, the annual number of building demolitions and nuisance abatement cases will be relatively small, perhaps 10 - 20. This Ordinance merely provides another means for the County to recoup its costs in the event the County wishes to abate a nuisance or undertake demolition. RECOMMENDATION The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Chairman open the public hearing, take public input, and close the public hearing, and that the Board of County Commissioners then consider adoption of the attached proposed ordinance. ATTACHMENTS 1. Minutes from the 10-22-2013 and 12-3-2013 BCC Meetings 2. Memo from Staff on Nuisance Abatement and Building Demolition History 3. Draft Minutes from March 27, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting 4. Proposed LDR and County Code Amendment Ordinance 5. Timelines/flowcharts: A) Public Nuisance Abatement, B) Demolition, C) Nuisance Abatement Assessment D) Tax Deed APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: FOR: April 22, 2014 BY: !i , ,1 &t Ul F:Community De/(upment\CnrDev\BCC\2014 BCCWuisanccAbatemcnLdoc Indian River Co, Approved Date Admin. ' . (./1/1% Legaly'ls t� Budget - C 1S-)/ Li Dept. M z(//$/tY Risk Mgr. — — A 46 ON MOTION by Commissioner Solari, SECONDED by Chairman Flescher, the Board unanimously approved to intervene in the three pending administrative cases (2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012), thereby preserving our County's right to have their actual costs recalculated, as recommended in the memorandum of October 15, 2013. 14. COMMISSIONER ITEMS 14.A. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman - None 14.B. Commissioner Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman - None 14. C. Commissioner Peter D. O'Brvan 14.C.1. Non Ad Valorem Assessments for Code Enforcement Abatement Actions MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner O'Bryan, SECONDED by Commissioner Solari, to direct the County Attorney to research and bring back to the Board a report on the feasibility of using a non -ad valorem special assessment for code enforcement abatement actions. Following the motion, there was a lengthy discussion regarding the processing of liens, tax deed sales, and non -ad valorem assessments. Vice Chairman Davis cautioned the Board about making policy based on extreme conditions that would be permanent going forward. October 22, 2013 18 ATTACHMENT 1 47 Commissioner O'Bryan was concerned about how the County can clean up a neighborhood, and ensure that County taxpayers get reimbursed. Commissioner Solari wanted time to review this and obtain input from the County Attorney. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the Motion carried unanimously. 14. C.2. U. date on Commissioner Solari's Re ' uest or Placenfent on the Treasure Coast Re ional Plannin ouncil's Agenda Clerk's note: This Item was heard following Item 15.C.3., and laced here for continuity. Commissioner O'Bryan reported that as Chair . the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) he was directed to ask that Co issioner Solari be added to the next meeting agenda of the TCRPC; he confirmed that C. ' missioner Solari's item will be the first item following all voting matters; and backus material needs to be submitted to the Council by November 3'l. The Cha an called for a recess at 10:25 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 10:30 a.m. with all embers present, starting with Item 1 LA. 14it . Commissioner Bob Solari — None 14.E. Commissioner Tim Zorc October 22, 2013 19 CHMEfT 1 48 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Davis, SECONDED by Commissioner Flescher, the Board unanimously approved Resolution 2013-128, providing for the recovery of demolition costs. The Chairman called for a break at 12:03 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 12:14 p.m., with Vice Chairman Davis not returning. 13. C. NUISANCE ABATEMENT SPECLAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS County Attorney Reingold recalled that on October 22, 2013 the Board requested his office to research the feasibility of a nuisance abatement special assessment. He recapped his research and provided background on the Counties (Palm Beach County, St. Lucie County, and Polk) that have adopted the nuisance abatement ordinances. He questioned whether the Board wanted to move away from the code enforcement process or move towards a nuisance abatement process. Chairman O'Bryan wished to see Indian River County utilize the current code enforcement process until Code Enforcement has a hearing, start issuing a $100 day fine, and after 30 days bring it before the Board to take action under the non advalorem assessment methodology. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Solari, SECONDED by Commissioner Flescher, to direct the County Attorney to draft an ordinance and hold a public hearing on the proposed ordinance. A supermajority vote will be required for adoption. December 3, 2013 20 ATTACHMENT 1 BK 144 PG 655 49 The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 4-0 vote (Vice Chairman Davis absent), the Motion carried. 14. COMMISSIONER ITEMS 14.A. COMMISSIONER PETER D. O'BRYAN, CHAIRMAN 14.A.1. SUPPORTING VACATION RENTAL LEGISLATION Chairman O'Bryan asked fellow Commissioners to consid'aResolution supporting vacation rental legislation, which would overturn the recent b. that was passed, limiting the authority of local governments to regulate vacation rental, If this is approved, he said he would present it at the next session of the Legislative Dele:; on. MOTION WAS MADE .y Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED by C an O'Bryan, to approve Resolution 2013-1 urging the Florida Legislature to adopt and Gov or Rick Scott to support legislative changes pro ding the ability for local governments to regulate cation rentals; directing certified copies of this Resol on to be provided to various officials, OT s izations and cities. Dani amson, Executive Director, 737-B Timber Ridge Trail, read a statement on behalf of e Indian River Neighborhood Association, urging the Florida Legislature to repeal the provis • ns of the Florida Statute, which prevents local regulations of vacation rentals. Commissioner Solari suggested substituting the second statement in paragraph four with: "deleting the restriction preventing local laws, ordinances, or regulations from regulating the use of vacation rentals based solely on their classification, use, or occupancy." December 3, 2013 21 ATTACHMENT BX .! 4 4 P6 656 50 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORAND UM TO: Dylan Reingold County Attorney i TIIROUCII: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICf14.t'" Chief, Pnvironmental Planning & Code Enforcement Section Scott McAdam, CBO, Mc "P ; Building Official 11 DATE: March 17, 2014 RE: County Condemnation Demolitions and Public Nuisance Abatement Cases (2009 -Present) Regarding the proposed nuisance abatement special assessment ordinance to be considered for adoption by the Board of County Commissioners, please note the following information relating to County condemnation demolitions and public nuisance abatement cases since 2009. This infomiation is provided to give a perspective on the amount of demolitions/nuisance abatements that have occurred over the past five years, including a comparison of total costs and recovered costs. Also provtded are some statistics with respect to overgrown weed public nuisance complaints and related enforcement actions that have occurred since 2009. Condemnation demolitions (unincorporated county 2009 -present) • All funds from the MSTU e Number of structures demolished due to condemnation- 34 • Total Fees paid to contractors - $173,490.15 • Recovered Fees - $28,294.55 (approximately 16%) County abatement of public nuisances other than demo;itzons (unincorporated county 2009 -present) Aside from demolition of condemned structures, there are two instances where the County proceeded with abatement of public nuisances and assessment of costs over the past five years: C;1UseralrolandlDesktap\Naisanse abatement 5 -yr history memo 3-14-14.doc ATTACHMENT 2 51 • 2009: Susan Kay McGowan, Case No. 2008100075 (1234 13th Ave), removal of junk, trash and debris. o 83 days of noncompliance x $100 per day: $8,300 fine o Cost of County labor and clean-up: $729.55 o Administrative fee per County Code Section 973.06: $250 o Total assessed cost plus fine: $9,279.55 o $9,279.55 assessment/fine has not been paid/reimbursed (0%) 2009-2011: Vista Golf LLC, Case No. 2009060086 (48 Vista Gardens Trail), mowing of overgrown weeds on unused/unmaintained golf course. o 57 days of noncompliance x $100 per day = $5,700 fine o Cost of contractor mowing on seven separate occasions: $6,170 o Administrative fees for mowing on seven separate occasions (7 x $250): $1,750 o Total assessed cost plus fine: $13,620 o $13,620 assessment/fine paid/reimbursed (100%) per April 2011 agreement Overgrown weed public nuisance complaints/enforcement actions (2009 -present) • Over the past five years, there have been +3,700 code enforcement cases pertaining to overgrown weeds. • Of those overgrown weeds cases, ±3,540 cases (±96%) were resolved, ±160 cases (+4%) were not resolved and resulted in recorded liens. Other information • Over the past five years, the Code Enforcement Board has recorded +600 liens against properties for code violations (including but not limited to: junk, trash and debris; junk vehicles; unsecured vacant structures; building construction/alterations without permits; landscape maintenance deficiencies; overgrown weeds). • Over the past five years, 219 Code Enforcement Board liens have been released due to payment of' fines/satisfaction of liens (approximately 36% of recorded liens). M:\Code Enforcement\Nuisance abatement 5 -yr history memo 3-14-I4.doc ATTACHMENT 2 52 unbiased decision. Chairman Zimmerman disclosed he had spoken to IRC Community Development Director, Mr. Stan Boling, on this matter but he was fully capable of rendering a careful and deliberate decision. The secretary administered the testimonial oath to those present who wished to speak at tonight's meeting on this matter. Mr. Ryan Sweeney, IRC Current Development Senior Planner, reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated March 17, 2014 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Commission Office. He concluded with staffs recommendation that the PZC grant major site plan and preliminary plat approval with the conditions set forth by staff. Mr. Stephen Moler, representing the applicant, came forth and offered to answer any questions. Chairman Zimmerman inquired if there were any unusual site conditions connected with the application that needed to be addressed. Mr. Boling responded this was a very straight -forward matter since the property had been approved for development before and it involved only a slight variation. ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Dr. Day, the members voted unanimously (6-0) to grant major site plan and preliminary plat approval for a 53 unit single-family residential development project to be known as Diamond Court West with the conditions set forth by staff. Public Hearing Chairman Zimmerman read the following into the record: A. Consideration of Amendment of Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Section 973.04, Section 973.06, and County Code Section 403.08 for Nuisance Abatement Special Assessment [Legislative] Attorney Dylan Reingold, IRC County Attorney, reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated March 19, 2014 which is on file in the Commission Office. Attorney Reingold explained under the existing code the process for nuisance abatement was for the RC Code Enforcement Board and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to determine the County could go out and abate whatever nuisance was found on a property if there was a threat to public health, safety and welfare or if there was irreversible and irreparable harm. He continued if the cost of the PZC/Unapproved ATTACHMENT 3 March 27, 2014 53 abatement was not paid by the landowner the County could put a lien on the property; however there were limits to the County's ability to collect on these types of liens if they were on a homestead property or in the event of a bank foreclosure. Attorney Reingold advised the proposed Ordinance would allow the County to put abatement costs onto the tax roll so if they were not paid the taxes would be considered delinquent and the property could potentially be sold through the tax deed application process. He reviewed the amendment with the proposed language to Section 973.06(5) and Section 403.08(3) of the Draft Ordinance. Chairman Zimmerman felt this was a very strong remedy and was a meaningful expansion of government power. He wondered if the problem of uncollected fines was so great that we would hand over to the government the power to be able to take property if the grass was not mown to someone's liking and was not comfortable with the idea that the government should have the power to take a person's property, except under the most serious set of conditions. Attorney Reingold explained the primary mechanism would still be through the lien process and noted any action, if taken, would require a super majority vote for the process to move forward and would involve only the most serious of violations. He stressed a property owner would have at least two years before a tax deed sale could occur, so there would be a lot of time to comply. Mr. Boling stated the BCC had looked at the question of whether the taxpayers should pay for the cost of removing dangerous structures when the owner had been given plenty of opportunity to do so or secure the property. He advised from 2009 to the present a total of $173,490.15 had been paid to contractors for demolition, and the County had recovered $28,294.55 or roughly 16% of that cost. Mr. Boling gave a brief PowerPoint presentation showing properties that had been approved for abatement. Chairman Zimmerman maintained it was an expansion of the power of the government to be able to take a person's property in order to force them to pay a fine, and he did not agree with the confiscation of private property to resolve what he considered was essentially a $50,000 per year problem. Discussion ensued. Mr. Roland DeBlois, IRC Chief of Environmental Planning and Code Enforcement, described the code enforcement process that would take place before abatement action would be proposed. Mr. Bill DeBraal, IRC Deputy County Attorney, related the County currently had the power to foreclose a code enforcement lien on any property except homestead after 90 days. He explained this Ordinance would extend the County's power to collect against a homesteaded property; however it was no more of threat than currently existed as far as taxes was concerned for a person who did not want to pay paving and PZC/Unapproved ATTACHMENT 3 March 27, 2014 54 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTIONS 973.04 "ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE" AND 973.06 "ASSESSMENT FOR ABATEMENT OF NUISANCE" OF CHAPTER 973 "PUBLIC NUISANCE" OF TITLE IX "LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS," AND SECTION 403.08 "DEMOLITION" OF CHAPTER 403 "PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE" OF TITLE IV "CONTRACTOR AND BUILDING REGULATIONS" OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ABILITY TO PLACE AN ASSESSMENT FOR BOTH ABATEMENT OF NUISANCES AND DEMOLITIONS ON THE TAX ROLL AS A NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT AND USE OF THE UNIFORM METHOD OF LEVY, COLLECTION AND ENFORCEMENT OF NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS AS PROVIDED FOR BY FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION 1. Chapter 973 "Public Nuisance" of Title IX "Land Development Regulations," is hereby amended and restated as follows: Section 973.04. Abatement of nuisance. (1) Whenever a county code inspector determines that a public nuisance as described in section 973.03 of this chapter exists, the inspector shall have the authority to serve the violator with notice to appear before the Indian River County Code Enforcement Board and shall hold hearings in the manner provided in F.S. Ch. 162. Any notice provided to the violator must state that a failure to abate the nuisance may result in Indian River County abating it, with the cost of any abatement action to be assessed against the property. (2) If the code enforcement board determines through a compliance hearing that the violator is still not in compliance with section 973.03 and that the violation presents a serious threat to the public health, safety, and welfare Coding: Words/letters underscored are additions to text; words/letters in stir# format are deletions to text. F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2014\Nuisance Abatement Ordinance(after PZC).docx ATTACHMENT 4 55 (3) ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - or if the violation is irreparable or irreversible in nature, then the code enforcement board shall direct staff to notify the Indian River County Commission, who no sooner than thirty (30) days after the compliance hearing, who by approval of at least four members of the Indian River County Commission, may issue an order to direct the county administrator or a designee for the county administrator, to abate the nuisance, authorizing the county's employees, servants, agents or contractors to enter upon the property at all reasonable times and take whatever action is necessary to abate the nuisance. Once the county has abated a specific nuisance under this section, no further code enforcement board determination is needed for the county to take future abatement action relating to the reoccurrence of the nuisance violation. (4) The primary method for bringing code violators into compliance shall continue to be the fines imposed by the code enforcement board and nothing in this section shall preclude the code enforcement board from issuing a fine relating to any nuisance violation. A nuisance violation need not rise to the level of a serious threat to the public health, safety, welfare or be in the nature of a violation that is irreparable or irreversible for the code enforcement board to issue an order of non-compliance with section 973.03 *** Section 973.06. Assessment for abatement of nuisance. (1) If the county abates a nuisance as defined in section 973.03, the cost thereof to the county as to each lot, parcel or tract of land shall be calculated and reported to the code enforcement board. Thereupon, the code enforcement board, shall issue an order to assess such costs against such lot, parcel tract of land, common space, open space, recreation tract, or landscape buffer. Such order shall describe the land and state the cost of abatement, which shall include all administrative and operating fees an Such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid. The assessment shall be due and Coding: Words/letters underscored are additions to text; words/letters in format are deletions to text. F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2014\Nuisance Abatement Ordinance(after PZC).docx ATTACHMENT 4 56 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - payable forty-five (45) days after the mailing of notice of assessment after which interest shall accrue at the rate prescribed on any unpaid portion thereof. (2) The clerk shall mail a notice to the record owner or owners of each of said parcels of land described in the resolution, at the last available address for such owner or owners, which notice may be in substantially the following form: NOTICE Date: To: Address: Property: As the record owner of the property above described you are hereby advised that Indian River County, Florida did on the day of 20 , order the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property, sending you notice thereof, such nuisance being: [Describe Nuisance Briefly] A copy of such notice has been heretofore sent you. You failed to abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by Indian River County at a cost of $ . Such cost, by order of the Code Enforcement Board of Indian River County, Florida has been assessed against the above property on , 20 , and shall become a lien on the property forty-five (45) days after such assessment. You may request a hearing before the Code Enforcement Board to show cause, if any, why the expenses and charges incurred by the County under this ordinance are excessive or unwarranted or why such expenses should not be charged against the property. Said request for hearing shall be made to the Clerk of the Code Enforcement Board in writing within thirty (30) days from the date of the assessment. The assessment may be placed on the tax roll as a non - ad valorem assessment and collected as set forth in Section 197.3632, Coding: Words/letters underscored are additions to text; words/letters in format are deletions to text. F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2014\Nuisance Abatement Ordinance(after PZC).docx ATTACHMtNT 4 57 (3) ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - Florida Statutes, failure to pay the assessment may lead to the property to be sold and conveyed by tax deed as proved by Florida law. If the owner fails to pay assessed costs within forty-five (45) days, a certified copy of the assessment shall be recorded in the official record books of the county. The assessment shall constitute a lien against the property No assessment lien will be recorded if a hearing on whether the assessment is fair, reasonable and warranted is timely requested. (4) If the code enforcement board determines after hearing that the assessment is fair, reasonable, and warranted, a certified copy of the assessment order shall be recorded. If the board determines that the charges are excessive or unwarranted, it shall direct the county administrator to recompute the charges and the board shall hold a further hearing after notice to the owner upon the recomputed charges. (5) (6) By October 1st of every year, the Code Enforcement Board shall direct staff to notify the Indian River County Commission of any property that has an assessment that is past due per subsections (1) and (3) above. The Indian River County Commission by approval of at least four members, may vote to utilize the process set forth in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non -ad valorem assessments for any or all of the properties. cost of abatement that exceeds five hundred dollars ($500.00) may be collected by the county in two or more annual cycles. (7) In an action to foreclose liens, it shall be lawful to join one (1) or more lots, parcels, or tracts of land, by whomever owned, if assessed under the provisions of this chapter. The property subject to lien may be redeemed at Coding: Words/letters underscored are additions to text; words/letters in format are deletions to text. F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2014\Nuisance Abatement Ordinance(after PZC).docx ATTACHMENT 4 58 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - any time prior to sale by the owner by paying a total amount due including interest, court costs and other costs incident to the action. (8) Upon payment of lien, the county attorney or his designee shall,by appropriate means, evidence satisfaction and cancellation of such lien. SECTION 2. Section 403.08 "Demolition" of Chapter 403 "Property Maintenance Code" of Title IV "Contractor and Building Regulations," is hereby amended as follows: Section 403.08. Demolition. (1) General. The code official shall order the owner of any premises upon which is located any structure, which in the code official's judgment is so old, dilapidated or has become so out of repair as to be dangerous, unsafe, insanitary or otherwise unfit for human habitation or occupancy, and such that it is unreasonable to repair the structure, to demolish and remove such structure; or if such structure is capable of being made safe by repairs, to repair and make safe and sanitary or to demolish and remove at the owner's option; or where there has been a cessation of normal construction of any structure for a period of more than two (2) years, to demolish and remove such structure. (2) Notices and orders. All notices and orders shall comply with section 403.085. (3) Failure to comply. If the owner of a premises fails to comply with a demolition order within the time prescribed, the code official shall cause the structure to be demolished and removed, either through an available public agency or by contract or arrangement with private persons, and the cost of such demolition and removal shall be charged against the real estate upon which the structure is located and shall be a lien upon such real estate. ay October 1st of every year, the building official shall notify the Indian River County Commission of any property that has an assessment for the cost of demolition that is at least 30 days past due. The Indian River County Commission by approval of at least four members, may vote to utilize the process set forth in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non -ad valorem assessments for any or all of the properties. Coding: Words/letters underscored are additions to text; words/letters in format are deletions to text. F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2014\Nuisance Abatement Ordinance(after PZC).docx ATTACHMENT 4 59 ORDINANCE NO. 2014- *** SECTION 3. Codification. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provision of this ordinance shall become and be made part of the Indian River County Code, and that the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered and the word ordinance may be changed to section, article or such other appropriate word or phrase in order to accomplish such intention. SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, then said holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Florida Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal on the day of , 2014, for a public hearing to be held on the day of , 2014, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Bob Solari The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this day of , 2014. Coding: Words/letters underscored are additions to text; words/letters in format are deletions to text. F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2014\Nuisance Abatement Ordinance(after PZC).docx ATTACHMENT k 60 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: Dylaingold, County Attorney Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Effective Date: This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on day of , 2014, and becomes effective Coding: Words/letters underscored are additions to text; words/letters in format are deletions to text. F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2014\Nuisance Abatement Ordinance(after PZC).docx ATThCH'iENT 4 61 PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT TIMELINE Notice of Code Violation/Notice to Appear Notice issued by staff to respondent, recommending 10 -14 days for compliance; Notice to Appear for hearing issued by staff if compliance not achieved within staff recommended timeframe 15-45 days Code Enforcement Board (CEB) evidentiary hearing Order Finding Violation entered by CEB specifying timeframe (7-30 days) for respondent to correct violation(s) or be subject to fines (typically $100 per day) 30 days -- 7 CEB compliance hearing CEB determination of public nuisance warranting county abatement, fine imposed and recorded as lien, staff directed to report to BCC for abatement authorization 15-21 days \7, Staff report to Board of County Commissioners (BCC) Staff request for BCC authorization to abate nuisance [Proposed ordinance: at least 4 -vote approval by BCC required for County abatement] 9-15 days (no sooner than 30 daykifter CEB compliance hearing) Nuisance abatement Abatement and administrative costs documented 30 days Code Enforcement Board hearing on nuisance abatement assessment Order assessing costs, to be recorded after 45 days (if not paid) as a lien against the property [Proposed ordinance: by October 1St each year, BCC notified of unpaid assessments; BCC (with 4 -vote approval) may place unpaid assessments on tax roll as non -ad valorem assessments] ATTACHMENT 5A 62 Condemnation Timeline Summary Hypothetical Case beginning on January 1st 1. January 1- Complaint received by the Building Division. Property inspected by Building Division, photos taken and inspection report completed within 7 days. Ownership and Encumbrance report ordered from title company. 2. January 8 - 15tNotice prepared by Building Division and sent to Property Owner(s), mortgage holders and any other entity having an interest in the property according to title report. Notice includes inspection report, order to vacate, order to repair or remove unsafe structure within 60 days and appeals process information. Notice sent certified mail all parties.Property posted by Building Division staff. Note: If Building Division's determination appealed, add 60 days to timeline here. If no appeal filed or if appeal filed and fails, next step is #3. 3. March 8 - Building Official Certification of unsafe structure prepared by Building Division staff,sent to County Attorney's Office for approval, and recordedin the public record 60 days after 15t notice. 4. April — May —Building Division Staff —Schedules demolition of unsafe structures for consideration by Board and approval for Resolution for recovery of County Demolition costs. 2nd Notice sent to Property Owners of BCC meeting. Notice indicatesproperty is on BCC agenda for consideration for demolition. Notice sent certified mailand property is posted. 5. May —if BCC approves demolition, property information sent to Purchasing Department for preparation of a Demolition Bid package. Bid package advertised for 30 days and lowest, most reasonable, responsive bidder recommended for approval by BCC within 15 days of bid opening, 15 days given to contractor to obtain insurance, bond and upon confirmation of bond and insurance, Contractor issued Notice to Proceed. The process takes about 2 months from approval of the demolition resolution to the Contractor pulling a Demolition Permit. 6. July— August - Demolition Contractor obtains Demolition Permit.Structure removed within 30 days. Demolition final inspection performed by Building Division, Permit closed. 7. August—September - County Attorney's Office notifies Property Owner that Lien will be recorded for County Demolition costs. Lien may be paid off (satisfied) at any time. ATTACHMENT 5B 63 Nuisance Abatement Assessment Timeline October 1 — Building official, or staff under the direction of the Code Enforcement Board, notifies the Board of County Commissioners of unpaid assessments. Board determines by supermajority vote which properties will be proposed to have the assessment added to the tax roll as a non -ad valorem assessment December 1 — County begins publishing notice of intent to use the uniform method of the collection of the assessment in a newspaper for 4 consecutive weeks January 1 - Board of County Commissioners adopts a resolution stating its intent to use the uniform method of collecting the assessment June 1 - Property Appraiser's Office provides the County with the electronic assessment roll form September 15 — Board of County Commissioners adopts the non -ad valorem assessment roll March 31 - Property owner must pay assessments and taxes or assessments and taxes become delinquent ATTACHMENT 5C 64 The Tax Deed Timeline November 1, 2013 — Property owner can pay taxes and assessments March 31, 2014 - Taxes and assessments due April 1, 2014 — Taxes and assessments delinquent if not paid by March 31st May 31, 2014 - Tax Collector's Office conducts tax certificate sale April 2, 2016 — Certificate holder can apply for tax deed sale April 2, 2017 — Clerk of the circuit court conducts tax deed sale April 3, 2017 - April 2, 2020 — if unsold, property remains on list of lands available to be purchased April 2, 2020 — If property remains unsold, property will escheat to the County and all of the County taxes and assessments will be eliminated ATTACHMENT 5D 65 4/2/2014 !O•A Z • Nuisance Abatement Special Assessment Board of County Commissioners April 22, 2014 65, 4/29/2014 The Tax Deed Timeline November 1, 2013 — Property owner can pay taxes and assessments March 31, 2014 - Taxes and assessments due April 1, 2014 — Taxes and assessments delinquent if not paid by March 31st May 31, 2014 - Tax Collector's Office conducts tax certificate sale April 2, 2016 — Certificate holder can apply for tax deed sale April 2, 2017 — Clerk of the circuit court conducts tax deed sale April 3, 2017 - April 2, 2020 — if unsold, property remains on list of lands available to be purchased April 2, 2020 — If property remains unsold, property will escheat to the County and all of the County taxes and assessments will be eliminated 21 6s. 2 4/232014 Nuisance Abatement Special Assessment Ordinance Amendment Proposed language to Section 973.06(5) found on page 5 of the Draft Ordinance. By October 1st of every year, the Code Enforcement Board shall direct staff to notify the Indian River County Commission of any property that has an assessment that is past due per subsections (1) and (3) above. The Indian River County Commission by approval of at least four members, may vote to utilize the process set forth in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non -ad valorem assessments for any or all of the properties. Proposed language to Section 403.08(3) found on page 6 of the Draft Ordinance. By October 1st of every year, the building official shall notify the Indian River County Commission of any property that has an assessment for the cost of demolition that is at least 30 days past due. The Indian River County Commission by approval of at least four members, may vote to utilize the process set forth in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, for the levy, collection, and enforcement of non -ad valorem assessments for any or all of the properties. 22 4/27/2014 Nuisance Abatement Assessment Timeline October 1— Building official, or staff under the direction of the Code Enforcement Board, notifies the Board of County Commissioners of unpaid assessments. Board determines by supermajority vote which properties will be proposed to have the assessment added to the tax roll as a non -ad valorem assessment December 1— County begins publishing notice of intent to use the uniform method of the collection of the assessment in a newspaper for 4 consecutive weeks January 1- Board of County Commissioners adopts a resolution stating its intent to use the uniform method of collecting the assessment June 1- Property Appraiser's Office provides the County with the electronic assessment roll form September 15 — Board of County Commissioners adopts the non -ad valorem assessment roll March 31- Property owner must pay assessments and taxes or assessments and taxes become delinquent 20 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST ►' -. NEWSPAPERS Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 SCRIPPS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Sherri Cipriani, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ad Pub Customer Number Date Copyline INDIAN RIVER CO ATTORNEY 2615347 4/11/2014 NOTICE OF INTENT Sworn to..and subscribed Yore me this day of, April 11, 2014, by WA, l �V L�`� , who is Sherri Cipriani [X] personally known to me or [ 1 who has produced as identification. Michael Merone slop 441 MICHAEL MERONE Notary Public - State of Florida My Comm. Expires May 20, 2014 Commission # 00 994177 Notary Public (-1.22•19 (OA./ . RECEIVED APR 15 2014 COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE PO # NUISANCE ABATEMENT • NEWSPAPER E -Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES ORIGINAL 65 5 Indian River County Attorney's Of... z NOTICE OF INTENT - P AILN CD • CD O to U O O.. N C — U • N U Q Q cat 0 Ad Number: z Insertion Number: 1 Col x 160 ag O N_ ) TCPALM.COM CLASSIFIED NOTICE INTIM CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER 00342 V, P50711060 IN RE: The Estate of: JOAN E. FORD, Deceased. NOTICE PLEASE TICE, InTAst Kan aM1eE 1?e 3019 day of January, 2009,there was yy from G. Russel Parsonel`Reprec Joaate envie n E. lo wing, :gdueM1t to: SteUnclaimed funds a pnenGag on. dress unknown, i `00.00 and tea assets claimed. remain un cli. Unlessaid fusee ar Vhid M1n or gear istVont Idcartim tM1 theNOTICE unado will 17. warded o aM1e of Florida, pu Florida EtatuteA !MINA lOF ITh.ve eHEAE hand iand Vofficio, fi fiear Indian RVer Coun of Florida. this 2nd April, "'a kofthe ORDINANCES & PETITIONS GIVEN that the BoarCommissionersr" of Indian River County, Florida, will conduct a Public Hearing micron r"g 1 aansider°<r<n661A): ena i a: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF CIONERS OF NDIAN flIVEq CDU NTD, FLORIDA. AMENO• ONS ATE' ANENDM0 SCE The proposed ardi nased by 771. pudic during gular hu3i ` oa5:o0 Iy8: Mondry Througgh Fri- dh11 Clerlo c(`the Board of County Commissionersl0- ea n ate 2nd the of n 'IA A of the rcpp �a °id'.m . ti tnh st°eel, veto Beach, Florida. Anyone awli ch may he n,a"de .t this 6'67flog win neve tp tim ofet =11 record made' a da4 waled m. ap pill i based. LY T 0 Anyone who needs - NT FORSBOTN t tial a TEMENT OF u fortst hismeeting NUISANCES AND Countys Arpm s act Me DEMOLITIONS ON Wiln D 44,6 ie1 Act NE TAX POLL AS A IADA1 9/40424707 as N.AD VAIOPEM 777.029140424 lean l the meeting.gayest NDIAN RIVER COUN- TY BOARD F C UNTY COMMIS. 5 ASSESSMENTS 11070 PROVIDED GOP PETER D. O'BPYAN, FLORIDA STAT CHAIRMAN INV1ANO Pfl Ia- Pub: April TY 6 TNG FOP LODIFICA- CNR61534I ION, SEVER FM Y, AND . EFFEC TAM GATE. 3]].06 'ASSES. SMENi FOR 00000 MENT OF NUI 000 9]30'FPUBIIC N ISANLE' OF E - TLE 1A 'LAND DE- VELOPMENT 7a6 LATIONS' AND SECTION 403.08 'OE CHAPTEPI 403 'P OF PENTY 0003 0- TITL CODE' OF TITLE IV 'CONTPA� aoP AND BuuD� TNG REGULATIONS' Oq1(NOE IrNDIAN PN U TY CODE THE AB Circuit Co 47:191 Pat Ev eputy doh Prob Div Pub: APril207 2074 `"° MaY TCN36153)fi ORDINANCES &PETITION5 N01000 0I0NEANNG NOTICE IS HEREBY NOTICE NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION TO CREDITORS The administration Che J. ee 01 G deceased,le dee o1 deal February P`il°Court f Fever Countyv, ` e2 address of which 7100 16th Avenue, Vero Beech, FL 33960. The names and addressee of lM1a nal preem> representative personal 191* are set fonts blow. AelesemBas on oeoeagainsteenn of nhisw ere a°'must Itle c NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION daima wits tnia Court WITHIN THE LATER OF 3 MONTHS AFTER THE TIME OF PUBLICA- Nls NO A 007 074 007 07 BF THIS NOTICE ON AR o6ter credllars 1 aM1e deceenna„nd ° ser pe,one g <iaime aemanaa detli mad deiama must mla Caps ,THIN 3 DATE 0: ST PUBLICA- ION OF THIS NO - s IN THE EPI ODS SET IN 5 FCTID E DA PROBATE CODE WILL BE FOR - NOTICE OF ACTION NOTICE OF ACTION USEES F 1HE U72 LEOVV a COLLE l= ANO ENFORCEMENT F NON -FS VALOR E Tate Public Hearin will April 1 22, 1014d on at trete li: Card, In the C tint Commission Chemlh baro located M1 Arai A4or of BuA V rninirn ofstrative County corn pie+`, 1801 21rr NOTICE NOTICE OF ACTION N THE 01177771 COURT FOP THE AND FOR INDIAN PNEP COUNTY, FLORIDA Eam Na: 340114292lcm '0747 P. SMITH, S CLERK OF THE IRCUIT 770077 OF NDIAN RIVER OUNTY,110MA nN a6TA flOYALE AS- IATICO' INC., AWPE NLE P. BO- R05H,and DONNA BO12,01 Defendants. AMENNDED NOTICE ACTION even. P. Borasn ata Donna B4rosh 691 Bio Geek A>nd OH 41136 Oa16 A^E12,7.'ED real tato°' 4Plass iff is fitly h to ug fromstse public Noss Sal< iemlerae bene olossz9v of the lt liver Cao in Florida 4 my TSTA ROYALE PHASE L GLDGSA PT z05 01 BK 5]6 PP PARCEL NUMBER 33- e...00005-0890 yBs been filed against 0ureda rus dsre of y6urrar ee pat iaedn L. Dooeemvv", 49140.0 tai fir" do a sed :dw 629 V r0 2014, 342'6„7 ane si the ribefore service f9anp `dna [sal anerealter; alnee en- • dclauh will be n - ma agamn Yau foe e refel plaint <a. in the Complaint DATED on March 19, P.Smiah Clerk8706,F= of Comfit Court gcqueste or A<coem m4daaipns by tM1 Dlehill neIW1m0, z4bdHy 2,7 lO 4.77014 n °n avroiVr8 participate cost to af eertsin _.s Dv, to the provision eet �aas ON C 791Club Drive, Lo)`<3F1 )34se6riTii- 1:1 ]0 at lee t ' b for u t aah`a< v mrlye"tib ef0e eif t e :chedelie an4 dw4 ed, ca11017. 'e Puh: Ar til 11, 18 TCN2615146 IN Jp PI The St. Johns Aive1 W .7.9emem �i`lhet �i idt�ao tUmp . ase 001' a aPPbetionlc : Standard General Consumptive Use *0- 3050 Cardinal Dr Ste 200. Vero Beech. FL 32963.4981 application 4950018-4. The ppT rapoeea o hndraw 0.003 milllona ggelP n ver day M 9 ounatio far witted c )sed augmentation). The withdrawals tlr wale used ani p'oolee pr uem TI c Gioun 904211 IndE r cial,A 47107,7 t.2nwS99c ',know hip:40 bar RidgeOI24e911.Ea`4 °W^ca 3 The fuels) containing the permit aPPllca- Mnlsl a v ilatle for 7.3207lan ondry 407994 Frieaf..Scapa for 7„s Didv cUatlN<a644 a Teras 004 Reid also Palatka, FL 21])-2529. YOU may w file, at one of the District's service `6 olio ev �<amo •nCie :n i4a�ne ine, a4e at , edilp ass . Servoe center cool a nfOrma- nl Vailabo online .html.iAdditi n - c0 slDlficec.M1rml. Atlditipn- alley,;771 )Damn file dp<w `n ge'� a"e� line ..dnl".o finer°nee. oeu �� °ferm.i Doran now and .ata sow m'applietion lila d4cumenta, d a,water.tamlpe tin choice from) rid nd p rhes topic of choice the "Find permits P- piie;�io� noeaam0, dna me �riolmw me . 71oo cal Soil Rep"nr(TSRlwar inner aapplication file documents.' De, n Standard ad."<ralheer °,!': woln o Ner PPI <a application pplica Dcadeexpllainedt °beio73 seoral • tial obi ai o a`S aneedm e: writ"''g , pa rau win Iratce ved byl aM1e r, Bu Regphtpry S P�O <tBDa 1429, Palatka, FL 381)31029. r by -m it a t 71111 nc l4 de ya u of part ca notification tQ Il nit re the Para TApplthletob r tato wain < he;iilt day Me application 1w/ion. • r the filth n eller n date on nice the written notice is depersoon% w 'n rhe U.S. mail of hoe a who t al not. notice is e -ma he ed e,<t.y`nawni<h rat. mailed 1^007 anon pe ata i . is ,anal bbyy m:�R, ar w< nate m< npf« c published in h a ar hf a tial le<e` e ps. mail mail). ▪ written �subet fief sed to rne`D s- hat e objector, `trict s Yidn:ap`o .hpI OI `sulmF(ve ane loofa. .4wai pb+er wit Ost e` red`a eo7101i�aiP'n" ntlndevi cal meiv re` ansae "e filo able ate District'swill receive ed deer notice me < application. deci- sion n Individual consumptive use permit applications will ba de ny me District's Governing Board. No. e f Intended District Decision will be provided t4 p who have request- ed individual notice. A request tar indi' McNeil Nm of Intend. District Deci- sion e< L"i a oo a application py. Sere must b received cei ry int need OistrpitaO Deaden is Renamed. For Indrtldu.I uermi[ appne7l67 2 you aMnel to oiaN Ne D.nrn Wmin to tions, n Hce tie informationmments, Of •obi re gelding the District If you M1cmakedtli% mitten request to tie nal tion regardinlgb specific ec dad a nu pryat yb M1 aTbl -I loitten b - des • III filing CM1 poria 0 FI Ida VI IN THE COUNTY COOAT O0 TIE NINETEENTH RIVER AL 017001015 ANO FOP,NOW CASE NO. 31 4-00flIOO 0 Op50006 207IPOINTE *00700INIUM 5510704 70 INC, FIKIA OYSTER P INTE AE301T CO mrporaOM ASSOCI- ATION, INC.,. Florida c p tion, %aindX, or ora- LVAURA NELSON, DAVID A. LUN. a married , 9nd 01075 0. FAR7ELLS ON, a single TO La P CI 28 NOTICE OF ACTION 0C eLOAV ONRAY WILKENs5o4 4 ak z 4'I, man )address unknown): YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that an anion o foreclose n me follow r, Indian `River County, Florida. to wit: AS TO DEFENDANT, LAURA NELSON: 117 peekle153121. e2 R2 Cond0m0!477 Na dont w`rdiing toltile Demand 0•071ia' Re orae BaOk m P rpae 0113 In tM1FI°rd'- andgecords of all amendmlndian ents thereto. er Bl any. AS TO DEFENODNANT. D0e1eAY WALKER Unit Wee2lsl NCI2I. R] m Condominium Na. d of • Condomini- ordingier Pointe Resort, Declaration of Con% Nea"�rds B° 4`6d31'et P e 0 P<D lie Records of Indian liner C°umy,nFlor''id 04 C9finny,aha L16=671=166'oOyst]B m Con ondomini. z14 i in Poin elDecl•ra of Can' urn. eof, a Declaration in Oifci 1 Records Con- dominium al Fag: 0113 mine Pub a'lecords of Indian River all amendments thereto. County, uFlorida and has been fled against you and yWp ar e yyvimd to serve a copy of y nrze4 de- lanc z, i airy, to h on PM1ilippaF. NOM1�, Es ' e, GrayRabinson339.A., P 0. Boa B]0, Melbourne, Florida 218)0, an or n forewith Apel ark of this sate file the original with the Clark Plaintiff iia'CDun yyeRner before .,.70 Ineeea7.0 otherwb<r0 %.78011 will be a0an ymu r p`ri ion.enal demsna- DATED: hMarch 28,2014 II J.R. SMITH Clark of the County By lel Dep., CCllererke k Requests Disabilities. s for Accommodations by Persona da n disability i -ea. o you re a person th a moor ev was needs pate in ni:opr eed v01in erLer nened.a . % ° il°e' r v n Adm r1a'Ao Lucie, idlb00 ],o Pan 5 ucie,E , ]4986, Drive, as left ] days your eh scheduled - ii F'a51i�a upon helium ,`.eduled appear- ance rife `thea, <daysli Darin Purler46l d,P11 ]014 TCN2613357 ieh,Buresu Cniel 57743• 7`, Regulatory Support C Johns River Wates Management =acid9 PeiSt2eet 1316 3, F F4 32177.2519 138611 32946]0 Ruh: April 11,2014 TCN261558) NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROBATE312014CW W 2,3 ,Judge Ruben A Hawley, GEORGE RE: ESTATE OF FORGE J, CARMI- IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE Ns. FOR INDIAN RIVER COMM, FLORIDA CASE 50. 31-1014-0400'0158 ST A OCIATIOIN01INC. CONIAOOYSTER POINTE RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOC!. TION INC.,a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, D VID JESERSKI, ON FAMILY TRUST, ILC, a New Mexico LiWN d Liabilityy Co, AMEVC:61' ;re ANDY L .ERSON, Defendants. NOTICE OF ACTION T0' ANTONIO BROWN, 9 single man (a- ddressunknown):and ANADY a7 00 7009..141. ANDY 1. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIES 7M1al an action Io foreclose on the following propel. in Indian River County, Florida, to wit'. AS TO DEFENDANT, ANTONIO BROWN, a sinle man: Unit Weegs) Nolsl.19 in Condo imam No. 124 el Oyster Pointe Res., a Con oneim. fine to the Dedarai4n of Com dominln 0mepl, a orl's m Ifici.l Records Book 643 aI PRge 011310 ,nF Pub lie Records ofIndian River County, Florida dna al amendmema macro, n dry. AS TO DEFENDANT. ANDY LAMAR AMEN S Na ANDY^ AMERSON: UnitWeekl.)aN Isl. it clam um . Int ace?7666n vgointa Rason, a Condomml. g to ins Declaration of Com old.7 rat a Pl, 000Records .44 J ok6e31.2 De n ih Iia6Re z I Indian grverBa county, Florida Farm some atnreOu'a any. ate: nems gserv>aein eat YY v a en de- quilted me serve ups A.,'p F. written 1st avPobinvon. "P.A., P.O. on le e- re. G - 3-13]0, or be- •'• pril'2e - a e lac Ve A incl wiid n. cIP1F 6iltna"cau ry mi`- amlvr<mer o'�Bervn " a deid4 11il.nbe Bela rine mfieilae a- DATED`nMarch2l9.Llid.p`elipn. J.P. SMRH Ce d IAEI,JR NOTICE Clerk 6ylla O puw Ole k 9egm D sabilr commode.. are a o n° person with bY eea disability h ed y.0 e1oa orderin participateproceeding, you are de a you, to P Ad - i1 -s NE [ 34469. 171AOi-4070.7lean )rat e` AU/rote 66;61 o eco u l a < n pp<tr eioe if the b focec the scheduledee appear- ance ie less than 1 Ow 1you a hearing Pulel;i1dPlal, 014 TCN261336.3 IR FRIDAY, APRIL 11, 2014 • SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS • 11 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Bill Rigby ADDRESS: 8465 59`h Avenue PHONE: 772-501-4753 SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: The Kessler Consulting, Inc. project for Solid Waste Procurement Services IS A PRESENTATION PLANNED? IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? X YES YES YES X X NO NO NO Rescind order to spend funds on this project ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? YES X NO Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form E -Mail Fax Mail Hand Delivered Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: MEETING DATE: ia• 1 i • JO /4/ Joseph A. Baird ii D Document2 Board Approved 11/7/06 66 Community Development INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE Stan Boling, AICP;g unity Development Director THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP; Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: Bill Schutt, AICP; Senior Economic Development Planner, Long -Range Planning DATE: April 14, 2014 RE: Consideration of a Request for a Local Jobs Grant by a Parts Distribution Company It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its meeting of April 22, 2014. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS As part of the County's initiatives to improve the local economic base, a package of economic development incentives designed to attract businesses to the county and to encourage existing businesses to expand their operations within the county was established in 1996. Included in that package of incentives was a local jobs grant program. That program, which was revised by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) in October 2000, December 2006, and March 2009, provides a financial incentive to businesses that create good paying, full-time jobs in Indian River County. Recently, a local jobs grant application was submitted by a parts distribution company. Consistent with state law confidentiality allowances, the applicant has requested that its business name and the specific salaries remain confidential as part of the local jobs grant application and agreement. For reference purposes the applicant is referred to as "Company". 1 67 Company is currently located within the county and employs 6 people. It is proposing to expand its operations within the County. As proposed, the expansion will bring approximately 13 new jobs to the county. Those jobs will be in the following categories: Job Title Number of Positions Wage Eligible Position Administrative Assistant 1 Yes Accounts Receivable 1 Yes Accounts Payable 1 Yes Repair Administrator 1 Yes Outside Sales 1 Yes Inside Sales 1 Yes Warehouse Personnel 4 Yes Marketing Manager 1 Yes Traffic Manager 1 Yes Vice President, Sales 1 Yes Total Number of Positions 13 To be eligible for the County's Local Job Grant Program, an applicant must create at least 5 new jobs, and those jobs must pay wages equal to or greater than 75% of the county's average annual wage ($36,280 current average annual wage). Currently, seventy-five percent of the County's average annual wage is $27,210. All 13 proposed jobs meet the minimum wage requirements for the job grant application. According to its application, Company is proposing to create those eligible 13 jobs within the county in two phases. The following table indicates the number of jobs for each phase and the amount of job grant associated with that phase. Phase Number of new Employees Date by which proposed jobs will be provided Amount of Job Grant I 10 10/1/2014 $48,000 II 3 7/1/2015 $15,000 Total Employees 13 Total Jobs Grant $63,000 On April 15, 2014, the Economic Development Council (EDC) is scheduled to review the local jobs grant application. Because that meeting is after the required Board of County Commissioners agenda submittal deadline, the EDC's recommendation could not be included as part of this item, but will be presented to the BCC on April 22, 2014. ANALYSIS The company is planning to expand in Indian River County and create 13 new jobs. All of the 2 68 proposed jobs meet the minimum annual wage requirements under the Indian River County Local Jobs Grant Program. Due Diligence As part of the process of evaluating the company for participation in the County's Local Jobs Grant Program, County staff and Chamber of Commerce staff conducted research on the company, its officers, and agents. Actions taken as part of this due diligence process included: • Obtaining and evaluating a Dun and Bradstreet credit/financial report for Company; • Conducting a general internet search for Company and its officers using key words such as, but not limited to, "foreclosure", "lawsuit", "crime", "criminal", and "defendant"; • Checking the Florida Department of State Division of Corporations website for corporate registrations and liens; • Searching County official records for tax liens, judgments, and pending litigation; • Using Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) to search for federal civil and federal bankruptcy actions; and • Other searches as needed Staff focused its due diligence research on the main sources of data readily available. Based upon that research and an evaluation by the Chamber's project review committee, Company appears to be financially sound and appears not to have legal problems among its principals and officers that might raise concerns for providing Company with public funds through the Local Jobs Grant Program. Local Jobs Grant Eligibility Review D Industry Classification of Business To qualify for the County's Local Job Grant Program, a company must be one of the county's targeted industries. Under the County's target industry list, Company qualifies for the jobs grant program under the "Manufacturing/Warehouse/Distribution" category. D Job Creation Threshold As structured, the county's jobs grant program provides $3,000 for each new position created that pays from 75% to 99.99% of the County's average annual wage; $5,000 for each new position created that pays from 100% to 149.99% of the County's average annual wage; and $7,000 for each new position created that pays 150% or more of the County's average annual wage. Currently, the County's average annual wage is $36,280. It is anticipated that Company will create 13 new jobs in Indian River County, and all of the proposed jobs will meet the, minimum job grant 3 69 qualification of having wages that are above 75% of the County's average annual wage ($27,210). Grant Calculation The following table indicates the number of proposed jobs in each wage category and the amount of job grant associated with that wage category and the total jobs grant amount. Category Qualified Jobs Amount per Jo i Total 75% of county average wage 4 $3,000 $12,000 100% of county average wage 6 $5,000 $30,000 150% of county average wage 3 $7,000 $21,000 Sub -Total Grant Amount $63,000 Jobs Grant Agreement If the Economic Development Council recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Company's Local Job Grant Application, staff will prepare a local jobs grant agreement to be executed between the County and Company. That agreement will stipulate various requirements, including that: • The grant will be payable over a three year period by phase. • Company will provide copies of its quarterly reemployment compensation reports (RT — 6 forms) to the County so that the County can verify that the number of jobs claimed for each local jobs grant payment level is being provided. • Company will supply documentation to the County showing that employees reside within the County or in adjacent counties. Funding & Proposed Payment Schedule If approved, the local jobs grant will be funded from County General Fund contingencies taken from five separate County fiscal years starting in County fiscal year 2015-16. The following table indicates the proposed grant funds to be distributed to Company by fiscal year. YI � _ t�������, r ���k F "` ' Phases Proposed Job. Grant Payrients 2015-2016 I + II $21,000 2016-2017 I + II $21,000 2017-2018 I + II $21,000 Total $63,000 4 70 The proposed payment dates and payment amounts stated will vary, depending upon actual performance by Company. Since there may be unanticipated delays in hiring new employees, an allowance for an administratively approved extension of up to one year will be included in the jobs grant agreement. That allowance could shift grant payments out by up to one year. In addition, the jobs grant agreement will allow for the shifting of jobs between phases. Thus, the jobs grant award for each Phase could be more or less than proposed. In no case, however, will the total jobs grant award exceed $63,000. Job Incentives Available through the State of Florida In addition to applying for a local jobs grant, Company may apply for a separate grant through the state of Florida. If the state program requires any local match, the $63,000 local job grant can be used for the match. CONCLUSION Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that Company qualifies for a local jobs grant of up to $63,000. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve a local jobs grant of up to $63,000 for Company. Staff also recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the chairman to sign the Jobs Grant Agreement with Company after approval of the agreement by appropriate county staff and the county attorney's office (draft agreement attached). ATTACHMENT 1. Jobs Grant Application (on file in Planning Division) 2. Draft Jobs Grant Agreement Approved Agenda Item: For: C 020, gOil B Indian River Co. Approved Date Admin. 9/i6/iii 1_ `I�\' Budget �/ 1514 Dept. 764 f Risk Mgr. F:\ommunity Development\Users\EDplannr\Incentives & Funding\Jobs Grant Program\Confidential - March 2014\Agenda Items\BCC agenda item Confidential Jobs Grant Applicant - March 2014.doc 5 71 Jobs Grant Application On File In The Planning Division 6 Attachment 1 72 JOBS GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND (INSERT NAME) THIS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JOBS GRANT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made as of the 22' day of April, 2014 (the "Effective Date") by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Board of Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, and (insert name) CORPORATION, a company authorized to do business in the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as COMPANY. BACKGROUND RECITALS: WHEREAS, it is the policy of COUNTY to stimulate economic growth in Indian River County by either attracting new businesses to Indian River County or by encouraging the expansion of existing businesses within Indian River County; and WHEREAS, the creation of new employment opportunities for residents of Indian River County and the increased tax revenues resulting from such business expansions or relocations within Indian River County is beneficial to the local economy; and WHEREAS, COUNTY has determined that offering a Jobs Grant Program encourages businesses to expand within or new businesses to locate in Indian River County and thereby creates new employment opportunities for the residents of Indian River County; and WHEREAS, Indian River County, through its Board of County Commissioners, has created a local Jobs Grant Program; and WHEREAS, COMPANY currently has 6 full time employees employed within Indian River County, and WHEREAS, COMPANY, in accordance with the county's Jobs Grant Program criteria, will expand its business in Indian River County to create 13 additional full time jobs which pay at least 75% of Indian River County's average annual wage level; and WHEREAS, COUNTY has determined that COMPANY is eligible to receive a Jobs Grant; and WHEREAS, COMPANY acknowledges that this Agreement shall be based upon compliance with County jobs grant program requirements; and, WHEREAS, COUNTY finds and declares that it is in the public interest to award a Jobs Grant to COMPANY pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. DRAFT -1- Attachment 2 73 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties do agree as follows: DR 1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall mean: a. "Adjacent Counties" means Brevard, Osceola, St. Lucie, Okeechobee, and Martin Counties. b. "Annual Wage" - includes salary, bonuses, and commissions. c. "Default" - failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement. d. "Expanding Business" — shall be defined as a business expanding its operation over and above its base employment amount at the time of jobs grant approval by 5 or more new jobs to employ 5 or more new full-time employees in the County within the term of the Grant. e. "Full-time Equivalent Job" - shall be defined as a position that is scheduled for at least 35 hours per week. f. "Indian River County Average Annual Wage" — shall be defined as the average annual wage per job in Indian River County as determined by Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation, Labor Market Statistics Center, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Program, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Currently, the County's average annual wage is $36,280 (effective January 1St 2014 for the state QTI Tax Refund Program). This dollar value shall be used for the duration of this agreement for determining local jobs grant incentives. g. "New Business" — shall be defined as a business establishing 5 or more new jobs to employ 5 or more new full-time employees in the County within the term of the Grant (as such term is hereinafter defined), provided that such business first begins operations on a site in the County clearly separate from any other operation owned by the same business. h. Phase Commencement Date" — the date that the County begins tracking qualifying jobs for potential local jobs grant payments. Such date shall start on one of the following dates: January 1st, April 1st, July 1St, or October 1st of a year agreed to by COUNTY as established within this Agreement or as otherwise modified in accordance with this Agreement. i. "Qualifying job" — a full-time equivalent job having an annual wage equal to or greater than 75% of Indian River County' s Average Annual Wage. -2- 74 DI j. "Quarterly Reemployment Compensation Report (RT -6 form)" — Form from the Florida Department of Revenue that businesses in the state of Florida must complete and submit to the state on a quarterly basis. Information collected on the form includes the names of employees, their social security numbers, and the gross wages paid to each employee on a quarterly basis. The information is used for reemployment compensation should employees cease to be employed. For purposes of this jobs grant agreement, this definition shall also include other similar county approved certified forms from COMPANY or COMPANY's professional employer organization. k. "Relocation of a business" — a business relocating to Indian River County and employing 5 or more full-time employees in the County. 1. "Target Industry" — An industry identified within the Target Industry List of the Economic Development Element of Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan (Policy 2.5 of the Economic Development Element). 2. Term; Termination. This Agreement shall be effective as of date of this agreement stated on page 1 and shall automatically terminate after COUNTY has made the last payment to COMPANY, unless terminated earlier by COUNTY because of a default by COMPANY. 3. Grant Eligibility; Payment Schedule. a. COMPANY will be eligible for total Jobs Grant Funding (hereinafter a "Grant") in an amount of up to $63,000. COMPANY acknowledges and agrees that the initial Grant under this Agreement is payable on a re- imbursement basis. There are a total of 2 separate Phases. The number of jobs estimated to be provided by phase is listed below. Jobs grant payments are dependent upon the number of employees exceeding the company's employment level at the time that this Agreement is approved by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. (i) For Phase I, 10 new qualifying jobs meeting the wage level commitment in Section 5 of this Agreement shall be provided by the phase commencement date 10/01/14. For each of the three successive annual periods that those jobs are maintained at the required wage level, COMPANY shall receive 1/3 of the Grant amount for those 10 jobs. (ii) For Phase II, 3 new qualifying jobs meeting the wage level commitment in Section 5 of this agreement shall be provided by the phase commencement date 7/01/15. For each of the three successive annual periods that those jobs -3- 75 are maintained at the required wage level, COMPANY shall receive 1/3 of the Grant amount for those 3 jobs. (iii) It is understood that the quantity and types of jobs proposed by phase in the above subsections, their annual wages, and dates of hire are estimates. Because of that, the quantity and types of jobs provided in each phase may shift between phases, and phase commencement dates may be extended. Proposed jobs will remain eligible for local jobs grant incentives provided: a. The minimum number of qualifying jobs provided in Phase I is 5. b. The maximum number of jobs eligible for local jobs grant funds for Phases I, and II is 13. c. The maximum extension for a phase commencement date shall be one year. Such commencement date extension may be approved administratively by the County Community Development Director or his designee provided the extension date meets the requirements of Section 3 of this agreement. If any of the 13 eligible jobs proposed for Phases I, and II are created after the Phase II commencement date or, if applicable, after an administratively approved extension to the Phase II commencement date, those jobs shall not be eligible for local jobs grant funds. In no case shall the total local jobs grant award exceed $63,000. (iv) Failure of COMPANY to maintain claimed jobs for at least 3 years at required wage levels will result in the reduction of the Grant amount paid to COMPANY, as set forth herein. If, by the end of any of the annual periods, COMPANY has not maintained the total number of claimed jobs required or if COMPANY has provided the total jobs required, but the annual wage for any of those jobs is less than required for that year, Community Development Department staff will lower the jobs grant award for the respective year by the amount allocated in such year for each job for which the requirements of this agreement are not met. Thus, the total jobs grant award could be less than $63,000 by the end of this Agreement. If COMPANY changes the products or services it provides in such a way that would make COMPANY no longer qualify as a "Target Industry" or if COMPANY relocates outside of Indian River County, COMPANY shall be in Default of this Agreement. b. Performance Evaluation for Payment. COMPANY shall provide to the Indian River County Community Development Director, or his designee, an employee census for the Effective Date of this Agreement. That employee census must list employee name, job title, city and state in which the -4- 76 DR2Ym employee lives, annual salary, location where employee works, and date of hire. COMPANY's performance evaluation will be conducted on an annual basis using the information provided on the State's Quarterly Reemployment Compensation Report (RT -6 form) and COMPANY's quarterly updates to its employee census. Each updated employee census must include the information referenced above plus the date of termination for each employee (if the employee terminates employment with the company). COMPANY shall supply additional documentation to the Community Development Director, or his designee, in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director, or his designee, showing that positions for which jobs grant funds will be awarded are filled by people who live in Indian River County or adjacent counties. The Grant eligibility determinations will cover one year periods for each of the Phases, with each yearly period beginning and ending as follows: Phase Grant Eligibility Determinations lsc °a 3rd (final) Begin End Begin End Begin End I 10/01/2014 9/30/2015 10/01/2015 9/30/2016 10/01/2016 9/30/2017 H 7/01/2015 6/30/2016 7/01/2016 6/30/2017 7/01/2017 6/30/2018 (i) Each job must meet the minimum wage requirements specified in this Agreement. Payment of Grant funds shall be made within forty-five (45) days after the date COMPANY submits the latest State Quarterly Reemployment Compensation Report comprising the Annual Job Status Report (as defined in Paragraph 7), and this payment obligation shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should the date for filing the last quarterly reemployment compensation report, as described above, not coincide with the date that an eligibility determination is made, COMPANY shall have the right to file a report, in a form substantially similar to a quarterly reemployment compensation report, and such report shall constitute the Annual Job Status Report, the filing of which shall begin the running of the forty-five (45) -day period within which payment shall be made. If COMPANY applies for a Qualified Target Industry (QTI) Tax Refund from the State of Florida and if COMPANY has that QTI Tax Refund approved by the State, Community Development Department staff will reduce the local jobs grant amount paid directly to COMPANY for each eligibility determination in an amount sufficient to cover COUNTY's QTI Tax Refund 20% contribution obligation to the State for COMPANY's QTI -5- 77 Tax Refund agreement. Community Development Department staff will submit the 20% payment obligation to the State for placement in the Florida Economic Development Trust Fund. 4. Job Creation Commitment. COMPANY estimates that it will provide 13 new qualifying jobs within Indian River County as set forth in Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The exact number of jobs actually supplied and their salaries, however, may vary. Local jobs grant funds will be awarded up to a maximum of $63,000. The jobs grant award will be based on the following: Category Amount Per Job 75% to 99.99% of Indian River County Average Annual Wage $3,000 100% to 149.99% of Indian River County Average Annual Wage $5,000 150% of Indian River County Average Annual Wage (or greater) $7,000 5. Wage Level Commitment. COMPANY estimates that it will pay 4 employees whose jobs are eligible for a Grant hereunder an annual wage of not less than $27,210.00, will pay 6 employees an annual wage of not less than $36,280.00, and will pay 3 employees an annual wage of not less than $54,420.00. The annual wage of the positions will be determined without taking into account the value of any benefits. COMPANY shall, in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 6 below, provide written verification of such wages satisfactory to the Community Development Director or his designee. COMPANY'S failure to maintain its wage level commitment for any qualifying job for any one year will result in either the reduction of the Grant amount awarded for that job for that year or will result in no award provided for that job for that year. 6. Annual Job Status. COMPANY must provide the Community Development Director or his designee with State Quarterly Reemployment Compensation Reports (Form RT -6) of its business operations within Indian River County on State form RT - 6, as amended, a sample of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "C". COMPANY must also provide the Community Development Director or his designee with quarterly updates to its employee census for employees working at its Indian River County location(s) (see section 3.b. of this Agreement). The cumulative Quarterly State Reemployment Compensation Reports required to be filed for the annual period, correlated with each eligibility determination and the corresponding quarterly employee census, shall collectively comprise the Annual Job Status Report. 1)RAi Fr -6- 78 Starting with calendar quarter 2 in 2014, quarterly reports must be submitted for grant eligibility determination. Those quarterly reports must be submitted until the termination of this Agreement. 7. Default; Termination. Except as set forth herein, in the event that COMPANY defaults in the performance of its guarantees and commitments as provided for in this Agreement, COUNTY may, at its option, terminate this Agreement. 8. Indemnification. COMPANY shall indemnify and hold harmless and defend COUNTY, its agents, servants, and employees from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, and/or causes of action which may arise from any negligent act or omission of COMPANY, its agents, servants, or employees in the performance of services under this Agreement. 9. Forum; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Any and all legal action necessary to enforce the Agreement will be held in Indian River County or the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida. No remedy herein conferred upon any party is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing by law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by any party of any right, power, or remedy hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof. Parties hereby waive their right for a jury trial. 10. Lobbyist Certification. COMPANY warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for COMPANY, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for COMPANY, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. 11. No Discrimination Certification. COMPANY warrants and represents that all of its employees are treated equally during employment without regard to race, color, religion, disability, sex, age, national origin, ancestry, marital status, or sexual orientation. 12. Attorneys Fees. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions of this Agreement, each party shall bear its own costs. 13. Enforceability. If any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, shall to any extent be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such terms or provision, to DRAFT -7- 79 persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. The Company's failure to maintain its job creation commitment or annual wage level commitment for any one year will result in the decrease of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year; however, such decrease will not preclude the Company's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for those subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation and wage level commitment. 14. Assignment. COMPANY shall not, directly or indirectly, assign or transfer any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement, or any interest therein (the foregoing herein collectively "Transfer"), without the express prior written consent of the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to any Transfer. Any such attempted Transfer without the express prior written Community Development Director consent shall be null and void and may, at the option of the County Community Development Director, be deemed an event of default under this Agreement. COMPANY acknowledges and agrees that the Community Development Director has the right, in granting or withholding consent to any Transfer, to consider, among other things, the financial responsibility and business reputation of the proposed assignee or transferee (the foregoing herein collectively "Transferee"); and any other items that the Indian River County Community Development Director, in his sole discretion, deems appropriate. DRAFT If COMPANY seeks the Community Development Director's consent for a Transfer, COMPANY shall submit to the Community Development Director a written request therefore, accompanied by the following documentation: (i) the name, address, and telephone number of the proposed Transferee; (ii) a description of the business and jobs, including wages, to be created in Indian River County; and (iii) a financial statement or other reasonably detailed financial information concerning the proposed Transferee. If the Community Development Director withholds the consent to Transfer, COMPANY may appeal to the County Administrator. If the County Administrator withholds the consent to Transfer, COMPANY may appeal to the Board of County Commissioners. COMPANY acknowledges and agrees that: (a) the County Administrator or his designee, or the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, has the right to request any additional information deemed necessary to make the decision relating to consent to the Transfer; and (b) if appealed to the Board of County Commissioners such request for a Transfer is expressly subject to the approval of the Transfer by the Board of County Commissioners at a formal meeting thereof, and such Transfer shall become effective only when signed by the Transferee and approved by the Board, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. The foregoing covenant shall be binding on the permitted successors or assigns of COMPANY. The prohibition on Transfers shall not prohibit a change in the form in -8- 80 which COMPANY conducts business. COMPANY will be released from further liability under this Agreement in the event of an approved Transfer; provided that the County's consent to any Transfer will not otherwise relieve COMPANY from any pre-existing obligation to COUNTY under this Agreement. 15. Conflict of Interest. COMPANY represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes Part III, Chapter 112. COMPANY further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. 16. Notices. All notices required in this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested and if sent to COUNTY shall be mailed to: Community Development Director Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 and if sent to COMPANY shall be mailed to (or current, official address): (insert name, and mailing address) 17. Entire Agreement. COUNTY and COMPANY agree that this Agreement sets forth the entire Agreement between the parties, and that there are no promises or understandings other than those stated herein. None of the provisions, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement may be added to, modified, superseded or otherwise altered, except by written instrument executed by the parties hereto. 18. No Pledge of Credit. COMPANY shall not pledge COUNTY's credit or make it a guarantor of payment or surety for any contract, debt, obligation, judgment, lien, or any form of indebtedness. 19. Public Records. COMPANY shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (Public Records Law) in connection with this Agreement. 20. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original copy and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 21. General. The Background Recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this Agreement. -9- 81 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida has made and executed this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY and the COMPANY has hereunto set its hand the day and year above written. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman ATTEST BY: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk APPROVED: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney COMPANY: BY: Title: Typed Name WITNESS: Signature 1)RAF', Title: -10- 82 EXHIBIT "A" TO THE JOBS GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY & (INSERT NAME) Company Identification and Information: Application received date: March 28, 2014. COMPANY description: (INSERT NAME) is a parts distribution company. COMPANY'S current local mailing address: (Insert Address) DRAFT -11- 83 EXHIBIT "B" TO THE JOBS GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY & (INSERT NAME) I. Target Industry Categories eligible for application: COMPANY qualifies for the jobs grant program under the "Manufacturing/Warehouse/Distribution" category. Under the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS), COMPANY's activities are classified in the category of "(Insert category name)", NAICS Code 11.42 II. Employment Commitment: The COMPANY is receiving this grant based upon its representation that it will bring the following employment opportunities to Indian River County: 1) 4 # of new, full-time employees whose annual wages are between 75% and 99.9% of Indian River County's average annual wage. 2) 6 # of new, full-time employees whose annual wages are between 100% and 149.99% of Indian River County's average annual wage 3) 3 # of new, full-time employees whose annual wages are 150% or greater of Indian River County's average annual wage III. Grant Amount Category Qualified Jobs Amount per Job Total 75% of county average wage 4 $3,000 $12,000 100% of county average wage 6 $5,000 $30,000 150% of county average wage 3 $7,000 $21,000 Sub -Total Grant Amount $63,000 *The actual amount of the grant will depend upon the actual number of jobs provided and the salary paid for those jobs. In no case shall the total amount of the grant exceed $63,000. F:\Community Development\Users\EDplannr\lncentives & Funding\Jobs Grant Program\Confidential - March 2014\Jobs Grant Agreement -For Signature.doc -12- 84 Use back ink. Ewample A - HaI [fwtltten EaxTDIE 6 - Typal O❑�❑2 3 4 5 6009❑ ❑ELrn"ICJ❑) 04.10RTER Et43115 Name Mailing Address CAyfSt/ZtP Location Address city /St. ziP 1. Eder tie Dna rxrn er a'tul-trIe old part-time mewl wives lain petforrned seivfoes didr or received pin for the perraf pe'iad induairlg it* 1211 of the rand- Ceck if Tina return:: Date operatic= peened. 1z Mo-,t•e 22nd Monti aid Month DJE DATE Exhibit "C" Florida Department of Revenue Employer's Quarterly Report Erploms ars raquirec to file quartet tax w e reports retrdoss of errployrrint activity or We -eery tares arc due. 3 3 Cne:k if yo: had ou:-ofstate waxen. Attach Employer's Q artedv Report for Out-ofStete Taxabre Wages 17-6N PikilirSign here Paid preparers only Use Black Ink to Complete This Form MALTY AFTER DATE TAX RATE RTA^.,OQUliT NUMBER n RT -6 11.01/13 Da not make any changes Jtyou do not have an amount number, you to the pre-printed are requited to registeseeinst'ucbscs). information en this loom FE! NLtsfBER If changes are needed, - request and cornpfete an — Employer Account Change Form (RT -3). Reverse Side Must be Completed 2. G>7ss atagBs paid ha aAartt Oa: tad all pages 3. Excess wars paid ho plate - (See rwnicton 4. Taxable wages pad this quarter (See irt' uctens S. Tax d.te (Mt 4 y L»e 4 b: Tax Rate; 6. Penatp due (See instrtrcton 7. ►stere dee (See 'muttons: 8. hstalneii fee flee n-'vctms' Ba. t:alame ntd_e (See )nz ucto-rs; 9b. Amwnt Endow: (See first-uctirtt5;' Ft l OFfl;atiL1JSEtaJL+ POSTIMI, DATE II 3 3 3 3 7 3 7 3 7 7 3 3 3 3 If yon ana filing ea a sole proprie:ce, is ill's for domestic Ihouoehold, emp'pyrne'1t 0,47 Yes VG 1J-idatpr. .e..ipexi, oe.aethatr, ereadtt_-eLnar;:t4-fe,Lstat.c 14 axIrce c ar;$4.s,tis)a-w413.:41121.F,ryzStairtes. u.'._1L% Cale Title Ph Dna Fax Prnpute,is drgxreturo Raparnt etseek H eoP-eentikrind Prepier or PIN Fon'e. rwsb fm yotns H ea H-wrybytks.l end adthx ss Rule? D -10.0;r Florida Aominktrariva Code ;Orin Daparrn?nt D` Sao3nue RT ACCOUNT NO. F.E.I. NUMBER Name MalIia9 Address CityrSVZIP L 1 Witt FEN ZIP tsar plrunt raJr"i'rr. Employer's Quarterly Report Payment Coupon COMPLETE and MAI with your P.EPORTPAYMEN'T. Please write your RT ACCOUNT hJMBER Cr check. Make check payable to: Randa B.C. Fund DETACH DOR USE ONLY I / POSTMARK OR IIAND DELIVERY WE .% II GROSS WAGES {From Liao 2 above.) AMOUNT ENCLOSED (From Line 8o above-) PAYMENT FOR QUARTER ENDING MM/YY Check here if you are electing to pay tax due in instalments_ U.S. Dollars J ^17 3 • RT -6 R. 01113 1 L cents Check here if you transmitted funds electronically. 9100 0 99999999 0068054031 7 5009999999 0000 4 85 11111111111111111111111 'WJARTER ENDIN3 1 1111II LFlorida Department of Revenue Employer's Quarterly Report R. o is Ein lbt+srb are tapirtd to fit quarls11y ttixtritags rep tr1a re tires of empiorrelatlhtly a whelleir m1 teaos WV dun,. Use Black Ink to Complete This Form EMri.OYER'S NAME 1 U EMPLOYE'S SQOw1AL $ECUR4TY NUMBER. n L DO NOT DETACH Mail Reply To: Reemployment Tax Horida Department of Revenue 5050 W Tennessee St Bldg L Tallahassee FL 32399-0180 11. EMPLOYE'S NAM` rpleeae prim fret twe+xb the le : d I ri renin rni tett chattier: of bet rra—tr it boom) Lasi Wane Fest Name Lasi Nan_ Fst Name Lad N3 ne Fri Name Lasa Nane Fr<t Nan Lad Nam F� st Nene Lasi Nam=_ F.st Wane Last Name Nane Last Nane Fast Name n n n Midas in -L31 Mitts In`isl Mid; e In: isl r,9ibe In:i31 tn'isl 12a. 12b. 12a. 126 12a 12b. 12a 12b. 12a. 1213. 12a. 1213. 12a. 12b. 12a. 126. RTAXCUNTtsumstm 12a. EMPLOYEE'S GROSS WAGES P O THIS 0:.1 015% 12b. EMPLOYEE'S TAXABLE WAGES PAJb THIS QUARTER Onljthe frsll.=rr-i1 eeatieipb?tretow wieder yeastub e. 13a. Total Goss Wages {add Lines 12a onI}). Total :We page only. 1 ;dada this .and totals from additional page in Line 2 on page 1. 13b. Total Taxable Wags (add Linea 12b o sly'I. Total this page prey. nolude this and to:ala from additional pages in Line 4 an page 1_ r 5 5 7 5 7 I L• l I :nr • I • Socia security numbers (SSNs) are used tyy the Florida Department of Revenue as unique identifiers for the administration of Rori la's taxes. SSNs obtained for tax administration purposes are confidential under sections 213.053 and 119.071, Florida Statutes, and not subject to disclosure as public records. Collection of your SSN is authorized under state and federa' taw_ Visit our Internet site at www.myflorida.00m/dor and select `Privacy Notice` for more information regarding the state and federal law governing the collection, use, o- release of SSNs, including authorized exceptions. Please save your instructions! ©.iarteryy Report instructions (RT-6h+RTS-3) are only mailed with new accoints or when there are changes. If you rnsplace your instructions. you can download them from www.myflorida.corn/dor 86 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Joseph A Baird; County Administrator FROM: Stan Boling, AICommunity Development Director DATE: April 11, 2014 SUBJECT: Consideration of Meeting Dates for Land Development Regulation (LDR) Amendments to establish the West Gifford (WGIC) Special Overlay Regulations It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of April 22, 2014. BACKGROUND At its meeting of February 18, 2014, after substantial public input, the Board of County Commissioners (Board) directed staff to initiate the formal process to amend the LDRs to establish the West Gifford (WGIC) special overlay regulations. Staff has initiated that process and on April 10, 2014 the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) conducted a public hearing on the proposed LDR amendments. To complete the LDR amendment process, the Board will need to conduct two hearings. Two hearings are required because the proposed amendments will change the actual list of permitted or conditional uses for West Gifford properties that lie within the IG (General Industrial) zoning district, and Florida Statutes Chapter 125.66 requires that the local governing board hold two hearings for such proposals. Under the statute, those hearings must be held at least 10 days apart. Florida Statutes also provide that one hearing be held after 5:00 p.m., while the other hearing may be held before 5:00 p.m. (e.g. regular Board meeting time). The statutes also state that, with 4 or 5 positive votes, the Board may vote to hold both LDR hearings before 5:00 p.m., such as at regular Tuesday morning Board meetings. To proceed with the review and approval process for the subject LDR amendments, the Board must now set dates and times for the required two public hearings. M:\AGENDA\2014\WGIC LDR hearing date approvals.docx 1 87 ANALYSIS: The proposed amendments were thoroughly vetted at the February 18, 2014 BCC meeting (3 hour discussion with public input) and at the April 10, 2014 PZC public hearing (1'/2 hour discussion with public input). Therefore, in staff's opinion, a special evening meeting of the Board is not essential, although the Board has the ability to schedule a special evening meeting after 5:00 pm if it so desires. One set of hearing dates, which would comply with state hearing and advertising requirements if approved by 4 or 5 votes of the Board, is as follows: Hearing Date Time Meeting #1 Regular Meeting Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:05 a.m. Meeting #2 Regular Meeting Tuesday, June 3, 2014 9:05 a.m. Staff has confirmed that the chambers are available at 5:00 pm on either of the proposed dates. The Board may establish any other dates that meet state requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board concur with the proposed hearing dates or set other hearing dates to consider the proposed LDR amendments. ATTACHMENTS: None M:\AGENDA\2014\WGIC LDR hearing date approvals.docx Indian River Co, Approved Date Admin. 11//01#Legal /i .4' l (-1 � /V Budget 411.41 Dept. $ Yl/yy Risk Mgr. 2 88 DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS Indian River County Inter -Office Memorandum Office of Management and Budget TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 14, 2014 SUBJECT: Quarterly Budget Report FROM: Jason E. Brown Director, Office of Management & Budget Attached is the staff report for the second quarter of fiscal year 2013/2014. Staff will make a presentation at the Board meeting. ATTACHMENT Quarterly Budget Report APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: BY: / U Jo eph A. Baird County Administrator FOR: April 22, 2014 Indian River County Approved Date Administrator la y irCounty AttorneyQ Budget 11 Department Risk Management 89 Financial Indicators Snapshot - March 2014 Compared to Budget Variance Year - to -Date Gas Tax (Fund 109) *O n m 4 n m 40 O , ,-i 441 48.4% O .-i ai * O if, o * * ai T * 0 M * m O N * ai m 41 NCAC * V00 ai ei M o ei N O m 00 0 * � C * C OE C � C * % Change Current Month % Variance Current Month CO** * 71 I * 8.4% m0 .--1 0 0 rn I-: 0 m 01 ill lir 2.4% CO Na I, 41 O a1 SI ,,... V M .-+ ji Ln * ei *0 N ro C * CO C * CO C *4 f0 C CO C 41 Compared to Prior Year % Change Year - to -Date Gas Tax (Fund 109) e ai N * m M 3.4%I * a In .-i 41 * 0 Ll1 ei * e a O e-1 **** * ai T * 0 M * m O N * ai m 41 NCAC i i`c,' rn (..4 48.0% Air 10.2% Profit & Loss * � C * C OE C � C * % Change Current Month CO** * 1� O 411 M "4 411 O N ao 41 tD W O ei SI* W a1 Lt1 N .-i II* CO Na I, 41 O a1 SI ,,... V M .-+ ji ,..... CO O M N 40 .. CO I- m * ro C * CO C * CO C *4 f0 C CO C 41 t O 0. a) ac Revenues Gas Tax (Fund 109) Optional Sales Tax (Fund 315) Half Cent Sales Tax rTraffic Impact Fees (Fund 102) Impact Fees (Fund 103) Tourist Tax Franchise Taxi Water Franchise Taxi Comm Services Tax Franchise Fees -TOTAL Recreation Revenues NCAC GAC Recreation Profit & Loss Building Dept Golf Course Fleet 0 0 m (Shooting Range I 90 O co O. E 0 U 41 75. 3 v 0 4' 41 to 0 my L O 0. cc dam+ to m a1 t fa 0' FY 2013-2014 2nd Qtr Comments/ Notes Most ad valorem taxes are paid by March to avoid penalties Received payments for grant for last I year funds Animal Control fines down slightly Animal licenses down Interest earnings continue to decline Cash forward reserves budgeted, but I not actual Difference from 50% VO i mi 00 0 N lD 1"i 411. cr l0 0 in- i 01 LPL O srr 01 VT 00 01 cr VT CO m 0 V- "--- 10 0 01 l N VT CO 0 t11 N L} .... 00 0 l 0 v .-i VT CO CO m 0 '-I '-i VI - $16,247,789 Percentage of Annual Budget 88.7% Cr m 64.3% 01 rsi u1 V V N m1 m 10 m m V 43.6% l0 N N YTD Revenues al 04 O ,N-1 ri cr 0 l0 0 .-i V} cr V�1 l.0 N 11:3 cr 100 O^ m VT NI 011 0 '^-1 .-i VT IA CON a VT LNI 001 lmD VT 00 0 0 V N $7,555,418 4:11 ai 01 M Mm N 4" Quarterly Budget (50% of Total) 01 CO N o ,-i-01 N VT 0 0 0 00 in. $3,320,535 03 N O 0 V1 01 0 V1 r in. 0 V1 r co $2,251,401 1 $8,664,801 0 v M rl d1 V1 m N 110 -j CO $42,063,792 o o 6 ,�-1 VT 0 0 ,-11 0 & VT W c-1 v O' O^ VT 0 0 0 Ol CO N VT ^ 0 V1 ,m-1 VT 0 0 V1 -1-1 VT 0 00 N V01 V V! T09'6Z£`LT$ 0 00 1.0 N CO 01 i" Department Description 001031 Taxes 1001032 Permits And Fees 001033 Intergovernmental 1001034 Charges For Services 1001035 Judgments,Fines & Forfeits 001036 Licenses 001037 Interest 1001038 Miscellaneous 001039 Other Sources !Grand Total 91 004 MUNICIPAL SERVICE FUND LComments/ Notes Most ad valorem taxes are paid by March to avoid penalties. MSTU includes communications tax and business tax that make this lower than other funds. Lag time in receiving franchise fee payments - 5 months received in 2 quarters. Lag time in receiving 1/2 Cent Sales tax - 5 months received in 2 quarters. Pool & recreation revenues much higher in summer Code enforcement fines up Interest earnings continue to decline Interdept reimbursements higher than budgeted Cash forward reserves budgeted, but not actual Difference from 50% 1-1 01 VD oa0 N NI Fl 0 IJ1 O aa v ($229,925) ($86,275) O� '-1 oi m 01 t�0 $12,824 N O r 13.1 Ql to to ri i" Percentage of Annual Budget ,i ,-co m v CO v 38.5% N o^a 27.4% 82.3% n 6 in YTD Revenues .1 H [t LrO N N2 V} r -N 01 d 01 m in- cr N 00 OCc) u1 N N $289,825 o to ICI l.6 V} m to u1 O NI In. o O N Nl' VT O tI 0 N in t0 If1 4 ti 4" Quarterly Budget (50% of Total) ON N O 00 V V V? O O Ol u7 m V V} 01 N O 1.0 N- N V} O .-1 lD N. m O if) r V u? O u1 N: m Vt o0 00 Ol .-i V? N O O .-i $12,491,528 Budget m V ri' 0011 00 V} O O 00 N 00 V. 01 u1 .-i Ls-) u1 VT $752,200 O O tri i0/1T O O V1 I.O. N. 1 N -O 01 t" in O' O000 $24,983,056 Department Description 004031 Taxes 004032 Permits And Fees 004033 Intergovernmental 004034 Charges For Services 1004035 Judgments,Fines & Forfeits 004037 Interest 004038 Miscellaneous 004039 Other Sources Grand Total 92 0 z u_ LL z 0 1- ce Q 0 h Z 1- N Difference from 50% Comments/ Notes Paving assessments entry completed at yearend Lag time in receiving gas tax revenues. 5 months received in 2 quarters & gas tax down slightly MPO Salary Reimbursement done at yearend Paving assessments interest charged until yearend entry Road resurfacing reimbursement entry done at yearend Cash forward reserves budgeted, but I not actual False fire alarms un 1 ON m mo to mm m m N iin.n ($8,034) ti m V o N ($1,759,878) Percentage of Annual Budget O 00 CO N m ry1 m I,L r. .-1 39.3% 0 ri m YTD Revenues Ca N lD N VT a rn r: Owl 0 � .4 fN1 L} l.0 m tD L-1 t/? m t/1 `ii . $3,828,846 Grand Total I $13,519,718 1 $6,759,859 $4,999,981 Quarterly Budget (50% of Total) 0 0 0 $1,297,278 O o 0 IJ VI ri Tr in $4,868,276 ..., O COa OO O O m $2,594,556 L/l O $50,000 -4-I .-1 0 1.4Ol L/1 Lt VI m VT Department Description 1111032 Permits And Fees 111033 Intergovernmental 1111034 Charges For Services 111037 Interest 111038 Miscellaneous 111039 Other Sources L..) a. 0 z 0 v E E 0 V Most ad valorem taxes are paid by March to avoid penalties Multiple grants received in full i • False fire alarms un 1 Reimbursements budgeted not yet received Cash forward reserves budgeted, but not actual Difference from 50% O N. r� O al r.:.. t/) tD m01m o m t/? N .-i t\ t`? O v t/} t0 00 d N t/} R 0 o to t/? 00) o t0 to N in rt N N Percentage of Annual Budget 0 H W 0 VI cr.)N06 0 t/1 o6 203.3% 23.1% 0 00 o O N. n YTD Revenues $18,298,442 N V1H _i- t0 $2,383,987 O Ti- 00 (.6r.. t/} .--I all 00 rri. .-1 t� Quarterly Budget (50% of Total) $10,390,712 NO N ri �(11 O 0 v O toil if)N L -i 00 tfl• 0 .7 CO00 tri m Budget $20,781,424 V N t0 th o00 .--I .1 al t/} O m m r-...- t/} I� 1/1• 000 00 N .- I V) O .-.{ m .--1 -4 th $27,096,690 Department Description 114031 Taxes 114033 Intergovernmental 114034 Charges For Services 114035 Judgments,Fines & Forfeits 114037 Interest 114038 Miscellaneous 114039 Other Sources l0 0 tC CO m m 0 0 N l0 0 01 co '.0 N o m t-1 93 0 CO 0.E O U Li O Comments/ Notes !GIS costs charged on a monthly basis. Health Dept- 7 draws paid in first 6 months.New Horizons 5 draws paid in first 6 months. !Maintenance contract payments due later in the year. Community Transportation Coordinator expenses include grant funds that have not been received, so are not yet budgeted. Lag time in reimbursement submittals. New carpeting budgeted ($125,000) 1 ;Expenses to be incurred later in the year. 1 Reimbursement submittals from agencies varies by month. CRA payments are due in full in December. Contingencies budgeted, but not fully expended. PACE Projects completed Expenditures based on reimbursement. Multiple position vacancies. Billed quarterly for staff from Health Dept. Not processed until April Difference from 50% Lf1N ori. N IN m Le M in m 0 1-1 M mi N in ($43,653) V CO O0 ut 0 V ,I l^O 01 in 1 ($248,467) O1 00 n Ol V 01 N LD L VT 01 01 O. V -I in l N .D r -I i/1 N l0 M V? m m m N .7 in N a N Q O VT l0 oo O1 Ln 00 00 VT Nm O1 N N .7 O LA M an V} lD 1.0 01 n in oo r -I N .i ri VT in ../3 M N N VT I- CO N l0 .-i v 00 00 r-1 N 01 in ($52,427) Percentage of Annual Budget CO LD .7 n V' .7 ae O O in L 52.7% \° 0 ri .7 gt.. N O V1 e 0 o0 CO \ M 01 N tD O '7 Co N in 2 NOv M M LD V O 111 LD in O O 00 oOl M m N V' 45.5% 1 *0O*o n in 0 00 CO V O V tri V ,1 m YTD Expenses m Ln m M V} LD 01 O M VT m LD N 01 in 00iLl CO N rf D 0 CO a 1/1. tD ,I V1 LD O1 VT $2,240,447, m n N m L/1 VT m lD r'1 M Ma. N N 0 I' 00 N VT N m V1 00 N u! 00 N V Ol ,I VT 00 00 N N L/1 in 00 I. N M Ln 1 a- 00 V CO N L- O1 CO Ol lb CON N VT tD m l0 Le m VT 00 lD N ul in VT 01 IJ u1 R N N VI 00 .i N 00 N an .n N 00 N 0 .ti to CO 00 V' l0 in N0) VT V1 N 0 Ln V N N In Ln LD 03 VT Quarterly Budget (509 of Total) 01 O,I n V VT N LO Ln .0 M VT m LMD 1 to CO rm-I 0 V VT 01 01 N N VT N 03 0 l0 0011 en $1,273,298 r-1 N 01 LOn VT 01 NN N Lt11 VT ri N -1 .~-1 VT 0 0 M 01 0 C iN/T r -I 00 mi. in. Ln 01 ri m VT $64,2431 m 00 Vl N VT 01 N n N VT ry V' D L01 O iA m 01 Ln l0 I-4 VT O 0 0 n VT O 01r•-• N 00 ri VT Ln n N N VT m rti N m 0 eti VT 01 oo m e -I VT Budget r -I N V m 01 VT N e-1 M 01 VD 1/ 1.0 1D N Vl m VT N N 00 O CO N ^-1 ` 00N e 01 Lii. 00 0 VT 1.0 N N m 01 .,i VT 0101 V1 l0 R Ln N VT 00 Q al 01 ri r•1 VT $1,042,4171 00 .7 LO m N VT O ll, 0 LO 00 VT o0 01 N N C' VT V l0 M 0 1-1 VT O 01 00 M N l0 VT $128,4851 Ln lD i� .-1 ei Ln Lf1 i/? $534,8571 rti CO N N N N VT lD CO m M 01 N to 0 0 O V' M VT 0 00 M LO M N UT 01 .0 Ln L/l V Ln VT $2,074,4261 00 in 01 N N N V? Department Description 101 BCC Operations 1102 County Attorney 1103 Geographic Info Systems Dept 106 General Health 107 Communications/Emergency Svcs 1109 Main Library 110 Agencies 1111 Medicaid 1112 North County Library 1113 Brackett Family Library 1114 Value Adjustment Board 118 Ind Riv Soil/Water Consery 1119 Law Library 128 Children's Services 137 Redevelopment Districts 199 Reserves 1201 County Administrator 1202 General Services 1203 Human Resources 1204 Planning and Development 1206 Veterans Services 208 Emergency Management 1210 Parks 211 Human Services 94 Comments/ Notes 1Position vacancy filled in Feb Electric bills higher in the summer and lag in custodial invoices. Grant expenditures to be incurred later this year. Grant expenditures to be incurred later this year. Computer Service costs charged on a monthly basis. 1Insurance charge done once a year. 1Postion vacancy Maint. Contracts and postage to be paid later in the year. Expenditures based on reimbursement Commission charged on Ad Valorem collections, most collected by December. TC returns excess fees at year end. Seven draws recorded in six months. First draw is 25% of budget per Florida Statutes. Expenditures based on reimbursement. Expenditures based on reimbursement. Expenditures based on reimbursement. Seven draws paid in six months. 1 Difference from 50% 00 m N OlslOsv M 0 tO N in! ($252,242) .y O1 0 ..i 1/ 01 0 a V? a 01 01 .-i V! V1 N .ti v 01 0 VD N .ai in 01 .1 LID M tn.V `"� l0 O a 00 n m l0 lD N a CO N N m 0 0 II �- N V! l0 m 00 N N 1/1.tn. N n .i M ofN 0 to 0 0 00 01 n Lil t0 n 00 N V1 01 .y tO �? a N 01 N N LT $1,677,513 Percentage of Annual Budget 0 t0 a 1 34.3% r m a Y ul a 00 00 a 1 34.8% L Ln a a 0 0 N L43.2% 1 W tD _ ta'1 g H N m Y. O1 ti N 0 n 00 Ln 2° n 01 Of 58.9% o O t/1 N g a O Ln o O t/1 M a° M 00 L71 52.3% YTD Expenses M N N L!1 a tn. 00 .-I M 00 Ln V! $1,392,464 tO 01 Of n a .-i in LO a a N a tn. 00 N 0 0l m 1J 00 N 00 .-I N .-I in 00 .-I N M CO N in 01 .ti 01 N .-i N in ri 01 0 0l 0 .-I V! 0 0 01 N Vl N 01 N id' O a V1 $2,782,584 01 00 of N 01 or N in 0 .i 00 01 00 n 01 .-I V1 $645,8451 01 n L11 t0 V! Or a 01 01 m in N a N VT O1 'i 00 O t0 .-I V1 $37,668,853 Quarterly Budget (50% of Total) N .i 0 N s ,A $84,922 (..0 0 N a 0 ,..., n 00 V1 00 N in t0 L!1 00O N in N n t0 vl in. M 0 0 M .l 1.4V! 01 0 t0 N $245,5381 n 01 a n V! n m 111 00 in LA a 01 M a V! $632,552 m t/) .i O N N N $19,892,9831 O a 00 n a V! uo 00 V1 vt M .-I V} n in tO O1 m VT n LO 0 N in.V! In a CO n 1 O a' ry1 '.j Q1 CI M t/► 0) ,0 m m N 0 O N N .1.4 m a 00 Oi VD N V1 $3,289,412 M N .-I n H M in .-I .-I n M 0 .4 V! m a .i N .-I .i V1 tO O O tD of N V} $283,2181 tO N O N 01 Or in m 01 01 a .ti M in m N 0 n .-I to 01 CO 00 n N 01 VT a 0 .-I 01 tO N ,..I V1 1D 0 m O a in N V! $39,785,9651 0 00 LO tf1 01 O N .1.n. tO .-I m VS N Vl or .-i m. Ol N Vl m M a VT 01 00 VD V1 N N V1 $71,982,6801 Department Description 212 Agriculture Extension 1216 Purchasing 220 Facilities Management 1229 Management & Budget 237 FPL Grant 238 Emergency Mgmt Base Grant 241 Computer Services 246 Risk Management 1250 County Animal Control 251 Mailroom/Switchboard 252 Environmental Control 1300 Clerk Of Circuit Court 400 Tax Collector 500 Property Appraiser 1600 Sheriff 700 Supervisor Of Elections 1901 Circuit Court 1903 State Attorney 1904 Public Defender 1907 Medical Examiner Grand Total 95 Quarterly Budget Report - Budget to Actual Expense Comparison FY 2013-2014 2nd Qtr ui 0 0 0 ` Z v c E E 0 V Seasonal operations at pool. Higher expenses (temp. employees) in s��r„r„er Seasonal operations at pool. Higher expenses (temp. employees) in summer Some seasonal operations (summer camps) with higher expenses (temp. employees) in summer. Cost of Goods Sold expenses less than anticipated. Contingencies budgeted, but not fully expended. Costs to demolish structures condemned by BCC vary and don't occur regularly throughout year. Commission charged on Ad Valorem collections, most collected by December. TC returns excess fees at year end. Difference from 50% L0 Al a a .n l0 O .-i 0 VI .-i 0 1 00 N N D1 co' '-1 H .-I M N m in.in LD CA 0 ti VT V N .-I m VT tV 00 Nm L -- V .-i v .-1 00 Dl N N LA •••-• N IN LA rn .,, .~i o vb. Percentage of Annual Budget 0 m O Al 0 a O Al L 43.3% CA 00 d' N Lf1 V' 00 V n tfj LA H fV VA O 00 V O L0 V y.0 rt O m 46.3% N 00 '-1 0 C CO Cr YTD Expenses $228,827 .i 0 0000 V} LD NLA 0000 M VT D LLA l^0 m VT 00 LA 00 n N VT 1-10 D7 co' 1 LA 00 R VT CO to V VT $147,222 N O VT AJ V' N tri N N t^ fl m eMi VT Grand Total � $24,983,056 $12,491,5281 $11,982,414 Quarterly Budget (50% of Total) O N N. IN VT H .-1 M m N LN LD v tin $375,447 00 �1 V~T $10,098,228 LA h N V~T I.0 tt N 1/1.VST O to LM/1 V CA V VT A L 0 m -VT O^ 00 vai 0 O i%? Budget O R V N. tel. N N LD N. N Vf LD N O 00 VT cr Gl 00 O n VT 0 0 LA n chN.11 M VT LA a � c I O N VT NM LA N Al VT 0 O 00 I.A. $307,0081 N 00 00 VT LD 1-1 � VT N 1-1 Cr r -=L/1 VT $80,000 Department Description 1104 North County Aquatic Center 105 Gifford Aquatic Center 108 Recreation 116 ucean Rescue J161 Shooting Range Operations • H OJ OJ H 00 1 Dl 1 .- I 1 [u4 Nanning And Development 205 County Planning 207 Environmental Plan/Code Enforc y 1 r -I V 214 Roads And Bridges 234 Telecommunications 400 Tax Collector 96 Quarterly Budget Report - Budget to Actual Expense Comparison FY 2013-2014 2nd Qtr 111- Transportation Fund Comments/ Notes Contingencies budgeted, but not fully expended. Road & paving materials budgeted but not fully expended yet. Car and other insurance paid in full for the year. Software payments made later in year. Traffic Fiberoptics not expended vet. Position vacancy. Contractual services for Egret Marsh/Main Canal will occur later in the year. Difference from 50% In O Oi 01 vrn al Ont m m A--1a CO n .i in. CO C o CO VI a COn Oi N 01 03 .n-1 n m v Ln O 00 N M rl ih Percentage of Annual Budget •i m N ci N Li) a 44.2% V1 ii tri am a 41 Lri q O N o .Cr C C YTD Expenses $347,533, 1 m N a N N 'i f/1 VT N N O VS m -4 Ali $815,278 01 tD tD 0 a 00 in. 01 m t-1 .4 LC) el .,./1. Vr in 0 00 N a L!1 in. Quarterly Budget (50% of Total) CO to to LCC a f� i/1 $3,494,392 m .-i 01 m to N in m m .-1 1.6. OI c0 in. IBbS"OLTIS N .-1 m o0 01 N t/T $6,759,8591 ma -0 z m .-1 .i OO .-1 i/T 00 IN 00 O Cr) & i/T N 00 m to lu0 N ON1 h .-i in $2,341,095 m l0 T L11 tn. 'Grand Total 1 $13,519,718 Department Description 199 Reserves 214 Roads And Bridges 1243 Public Works 1244 County Engineering 1245 Traffic Engineering 281 Stormwater Comments/ Notes 12.3 pay periods out of 26 were paid YTD. This is 47.3% of salaries rather than 50%. 12.3 pay periods out of 26 were paid YTD. This is 47.3% of salaries rather than 50%. Car and other insurance paid in full for the year. Capital item re -allocated Payment to Division of Forestry made once per year, done in October. Tax collector charges over budget as in other taxing funds. Will receive excess fees at the end of the year. Contingencies also budgeted but not fully expended. Difference from 50% ($562,835) 03 O 1. -4 � v N Oo CO ($379,448) 00 ke +/T N. IJ m N. VTO a, m n R m H in Percentage of Annual Budget N l0 a 47.6% m ry to n tD O 00 i * O a a N Li Cr YTD Expenses N 00 Lci N CO l0 tn. 01 00 ,-4 n .-i m N a n 0 N cii. in. m .-i O N 1.2- .1 00 N iI N N -4 N to $12,481,399 Quarterly Budget (50% of Total) Ln of m m I- VT Ln 01 01 0 al N m to $2,117,512 $178,335 ,13 Cl- 01 ui in $591,754 $13,579,138 0 -0 0 m $14,779,314 VI 00 0 R an 4.0 1/ in to 01 ni N v 1f ln 01 00 v m i^ NI N CO mi 1./1..n-1 N 03 n .- to (Grand Total $27,096,690 Department Description H 01 CO t o w 0) c CU 00 Operating Capital Outlay Grants and Aids Other Uses N 01 97 Regular Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: April 10, 2014 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services 6#) Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager AW Subject: Alternative Water Supply Evaluation — Work Order No. 11 with CDM Smith Inc. DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On February 4th, 2014 under Commissioner Bob Solari's matters, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) directed staff to do the following: • Review the conclusions of the 2007 Alternate Water Supply Study which suggests having a surface water supply for the future; • Enter into dialogue with the St. John's River Water Management District to obtain the expertise that they can offer; • Design a long term system; • Analyze the usage of water in the County; • Bring the Board a proposal for a feasibility study to develop a fresh surface water system complete with necessary reservoir system; and • Include in the proposal a request for funding from the St. John's River Water Management District. Concurrently staff has met with St. Johns River Water Management District staff and attended their presentations on the Draft District Water Plan. ANALYSIS: Staff requested that CDM Smith, Inc (CDM) prepare a proposal to embark on a study for an alternative water supply. The proposal for an alternative water supply evaluation will be conducted in a phased approach. Phase I- Preliminary Evaluation Phase II — Modeling and Land Acquisition Phase III — Final design, permitting and construction The subject authorization from BCC is only for the Phase I portion of the evaluation. Phase I of the evaluation will address all the bulleted items requested by BCC except designing a long term system. f:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\WATER\Alternative Water Supply\2014 Alternative Water Supply\Agenda - Alternative Water Supply Evaluation -4- 14-14.docx Page 1 of 2 98 CDM Smith, Inc., has submitted Work Order No. 11 to evaluate the feasibility of an alternative water supply to serve the residents of Indian River County. On October 4th, 2011, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services with CDM. The total negotiated cost for the Phase I portion of an alternative water supply evaluation is a lump sum amount of $ 70,905.00. A final report of the Phase I findings will be provided within 120 -days from notice to proceed. FUNDING: Funds for this project are derived from the other professional services account in the operating fund. Operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales. ACCOUNT NO.: Description Account Number Amount Other Professional Services 47123536-033190 $70,905.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached Work Order No. 11 authorizing the above-mentioned professional services and requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Work Order No. 11 on their behalf for a sum amount of $ 70,905.00 to CDM Smith, Inc. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Work Order No. 11 for Alternative Water Supply Evaluation with CDM Smith, Inc. APPROVED FOR AGENDA: h A. Baird, County Administrator a?D/ -51 Date Indian River Co. Approved Date Administration y,'//6/1$/ Legal Et Budget 9 litf Utilities �rFJ/ Utilities -Finance M 1{ F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\WATER\Alternative Water Supply\2014 Alternative Water Supply\Agenda - Alternative Water Supply Evaluation -4- 14-14.docx Page 2 of 2 99 WORK ORDER NUMBER 11 This Work Order Number 11 is entered into as of this day of , 2014 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of December 6, 2011 ("Agreement"), by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and CDM Smith Inc., formerly Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit A (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT CDM Smith Inc. r By: Eric J. tke, P.E., BCEE Vice President BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court By: Deputy Clerk A. proved: 'oseph Baird, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: an Reingold, County Attorney if1419RFVS (1).dot.datx 100 Smith 2301 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 300 Maitland, Florida 32751 tel: +1 407 660-2552 fax: +1 407 875-1161 cdmsmith.com April 14, 2014 Mr. Vincent Burke, P.E. Director of Utility Services Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Subject: Dear Mr. Burke: Continuing Consulting Services Work Order No. 11 Alternative Water Supply Evaluation Surface Water Reservoir Feasibility Analysis (Phase 1) Transmitted herewith are two copies of Work Order No. 11 for professional services related to the Phase 1- Feasibility Analysis to construct a future surface water storage reservoir. This authorization is to provide identification of key project components and stakeholders, preliminary evaluation of a specific project site, environmental due diligence evaluation for the proposed site, and development of an amendment to the previously prepared Alternative Water Supply Master Plan (AWSMP). Due to the nature of this project, CDM Smith will rely primarily on senior technical experts to perform the evaluation and review the available data. As project manager, I (Jill Grimaldi) was actively involved in the development of the initial AWSMP. Now a Senior Project Manager and Principal Scientist,1 will again take a lead role in developing the future demand requirements and evaluating the proposed reservoir property/project. In addition, Principal Engineer Lena Rivera will take the technical lead in sizing the reservoir, developing the water balance, reviewing the data collected and evaluating the logistics for connecting the reservoir to the proposed water treatment plant. Lee Wiseman, Associate Engineer, will oversee all facets of this project and insure that the evaluation is comprehensive and that the end recommendations are viable for use in determining the next steps to be taken. Eric Grotke will serve as the Officer -in -Charge of the project and serve as both the client service leader and in the capacity of reviewer of all deliverables. CDM Smith will also rely on junior level drafters and engineers for development of figures, maps, and data entry. CDM Smith looks forward to working with the County on this project. p1419REVS121.doc.docs WATER + ENVIRONMENT + TRANSPORTATION + ENERGY + FACILITIES 4 101 Smith Mr, Vincent Burke, P.E. April 14, 2014 Page 2 If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. Sincerely, ati Jill T. Grimaldi, BCES Principal Scientist CDM Smith Inc. JTG/EJG/jj Attachments File: 0000-EJGMK-MG.IRC cc: Arjuna Weragoda, IRC Approved by: Eric J, Grotke, P.E., BCEE Vice President CDM Smith Inc. Doeume. t 102 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY EVALUATION SURFACE WATER RESERVOIR FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS (PHASE I) Background In September 2007, CDM Smith Inc. (Consultant) completed an Alternative Water Supply Master Plan (AWSMP) for Indian River County Department of Utility Services (County). The AWSMP was intended to identify various potential sources of raw water to supply a future water treatment plant (WTP) and address the long-term demand for potable water within the County. The County currently operates two reverse osmosis WTPs that are supplied by a total of 15 production wells constructed into the Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA). The UFA is relied upon regionally by utilities in Central Florida for potable water supply and locally to supply agricultural operations with irrigation. Rather than rely on this already stressed supply source for long-term planning, options such as surface water treatment, surficial aquifer wells, seawater desalination, and deep wells targeting the Boulder Zone were evaluated in the AWSMP as potential sources. The primary recommendation of the AWSP was for the County to pursue a surface water source, with the next step to be identification of a specific withdrawal point. The surface water withdrawals are proposed to supplement limited groundwater supplies traditionally used by the County. Managing the conjunctive use of these sources will result in improved water availability and reliability for the County. On January 28, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to: 1. Review the conclusions of the 2007 AWSMP, which suggests having a surface water supply for the future; 2. Enter into dialogue with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) to obtain the expertise that they can offer; 3. Design a Tong -term system; 4. Analyze the usage of water in the County; 5. Bring the Board a proposal for a feasibility study to develop a fresh surface water system complete with necessary reservoir system; and 6. Include in the proposal a request for funding from the SJRWMD. The development of a long-term alternative water supply will require numerous steps to be completed in phases over the planning period. Specifically, 3 Phases are anticipated. Phase 1 will include initial planning items such as review of the previously completed AWSMP (CDM, 2007), evaluation of the potential site, initial sizing of the reservoir and corresponding surface water treatment plant, and an evaluation of the land acquisition process. Phase 2 would then include final site selection, detailed surface water modeling and land acquisition activities. Phase 3 would include the detailed design of the reservoir system, transmission piping and treatment process, as well as permitting activities. This Scope A-1 p1429REV5 (2).doc,docx 103 of Services will specifically address Phase 1; however, a more detailed account of each of the anticipated Phases is provided below for informational purposes. Phase 1— Preliminary Evaluation Phase 1 will include: 1. Review of the previously completed Alternative Water Supply Master Plan (CDM, 2007). 2. Identification of stakeholders (utilities, interested parties/advisory committees/boards, real estate brokers, consultants, local regulatory agencies, state agencies, etc.). 3. Site identification and evaluation (environmental due diligence including a field visit by Consultant staff, existing/future land use, soil/hydrologic conditions, permitability review, constructability review, access/proximity to potential sources, regulatory issues (operations and maintenance implications, long-term ecological considerations, etc.)). 4. Primary and ancillary siting considerations (permitting, environmental impacts, ownership, land acquisition obstacles, etc.). S. Project benefits (stormwater improvement, potable water supply, aquifer recharge, recreation components, etc.). 6. Indian River Lagoon impacts (diversion of stormwater, stormwater treatment, nutrient load reduction/credits). 7. Drought impacts/considerations (general discussion on how drought conditions affect surface water projects and the operational flexibility required to counter these impacts). 8. Development of long-term demand projections using existing future land use maps, corresponding population densities, and available information from the Metropolitan Planning Organization (future phases will also rely on population projections available from University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) and the Shimberg Center). 9. Reservoir sizing (utility only vs. utility and agricultural) — This task will require input from the agricultural community to provide the demand for agricultural use (no services are included to develop agricultural demand numbers). 10. A preliminary cost estimate for land acquisition, engineering costs, reservoir construction, pipeline construction and general discussion on the range of typical costs for operations and maintenance (O&M) associated with surface water treatment systems, and range of anticipated capital costs for construction of the corresponding surface water treatment plant. 11. Preparation of a detailed summary report including discussion of all of the above items for use in obtaining stakeholder input/buy-in and recommendations to move the project forward to Phase 2. Phase 2 — Modeling and Land Acquisition Assuming that the evaluation performed in Phase 1 results in identification of a viable parcel or parcels of land suitable for construction of the proposed reservoir, the proposed reservoir is technically and A-2 jj1429REV5 (2).doc.docx 104 economically feasible and that land is available for acquisition, Phase 2 would include the detailed modeling efforts to determine if sufficient surface water is available from the surrounding canal system to supply the reservoir. Phase 2 tasks will include: 1. Preparation of a modeling approach technical memorandum for submittal to and review/approval by St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) prior to commencing modeling activities. 2. Unless already available from the local drainage districts and property owners, it is anticipated that survey services will be required during this Phase to identify critical elevations, distances and property boundaries. The survey data will be used in development of the project models. 3. A stormwater runoff and routing model will be needed to define the hydrology and hydraulics (H&H) of the Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID) canal system. Consultant requested and received a copy of the recently updated H&H model (using the advanced Inter -Connected Pond Routing software) from the water improvement district for simulating surface water inflows into the reservoir. This H&H model will need to be capable of performing continuous simulations of surface water flow in the canal system over a 20 to 30 year time period to capture low, average, and high flow conditions in the surface waters providing flow to the reservoir. If the SRID H&H model is a storm event based model, the model will need to be revised by Consultant to simulate continuous flows. 4. Upon approval of the approach, Consultant will develop an operations model utilizing STELLA, a widely used systems model for evaluating inflows, outflows, and storage components of systems similar to that proposed by the County. The STELLA model will be used to perform a continuous simulation of the proposed reservoir operations over a 20 to 30 year period. The model will account for historical rainfall patterns as well as take into account surface water inflows from the SRID canals, evaporation, seepage, and other releases from the reservoir (water supply and emergency overflow) on a daily basis over the 20 to 30 year time period. 5. Modeling results will be used to quantify the amount of surface water that can be anticipated during drought conditions, average rainfall conditions, and during high rainfall periods. This information will then be utilized to refine the reservoir sizing evaluation performed in Phase 1. The result may be that the size of the reservoir presented in Phase 1 based on the maximum demand (population projection based) would be reduced based on actual, available flow. 6. The modeling summary will be submitted to SJRWMD for review and comment, and modeling will be updated if needed based on comments received. Actual permitting activities would be performed during Phase 3, in conjunction with final design efforts. 7. Once the modeling is accepted by SJRWMD, the County would move forward in acquiring the land for the project (both reservoir construction and rights-of-way for the necessary transmission piping). Phase 3 — Final Design, Permitting and Construction Once the modeling is complete, a refined reservoir size is determined, and land is acquired, final design and permitting activities can commence. The initial step would be to develop a preliminary design report in which a treatment process is selected to treat surface water from the reservoir. To do this, A-3 )jt429REVS (2).doc.docx 105 background sampling of the source water will be required. The detailed steps to be completed in Phase 3 are as follows: 1. Collection of surface water samples for analysis of primary and secondary water quality standards, as well as applicable field parameters (turbidity, specific conductance, temperature, pH, color). This data will be used to determine the required pre-treatment and treatment components of the new WTP. 2. Preparation of the preliminary design report. This will identify the proposed treatment process, budget level cost estimates, storage/blending requirements and conceptual layout of the proposed WTP. It is assumed at this time that the new WTP will be co -located at the existing North County WTP. If the existing available space at the North County WTP is not sufficient, an alternative site will be identified prior to design. 3. Final design of the water treatment plant, reservoir and pipelines. 4. Preparation/submittal of necessary permit applications. 5. Services during construction. 6. Start-up of the new facilities. The following Scope of Services addresses Phase 1, with consideration of the remaining items under a future authorization. SCOPE OF SERVICES — PHASE 1 ONLY Consultant will perform the following task services associated with Phase 1 for the development of a surface water reservoir system: TASK 1.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUSLY PREPARED ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN It is anticipated that the recommendation of the previously completed Alternative Water Supply Master Plan (CDM, 2007) to develop a surface water source is still the desired recommendation moving forward. Consultant will, however, review the recommendations of the AWSMP and present any suggested modifications to County staff prior to proceeding with the feasibility study portion of this Scope. The final summary report will include detailed discussion on this review. TASK 2.0 IDENTIFICATION OF AND COORDINATION WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS Consultant will identify key stakeholders to provide input throughout the evaluation phase, including County staff, engineering consultants, Florida Department of Transportation, real estate brokers, land owners, Agricultural Advisory Committee members, Soil and Water Conservation District board members, SJRWMD staff, Sebastian River Improvement District staff and any others identified in the process. County staff will circulate the scope of services to the stakeholders for input and feedback, and will provide applicable comments to Consultant. Consultant will provide minimal coordination efforts (4 hours of coordination included in the budget) to address comments received from County staff. TASK 3.0 FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS Consultant will perform a feasibility analysis that builds upon the work previously completed in the AWSMP, specifically directed at the parcel of property (approximately 4,000 acres) presented by the local water improvement district. One site visit will be conducted by the Consultant's technical staff in support of this analysis (in conjunction with one meeting identified in Task 5). Consultant will prepare A-4 III 429REV5 (2) doc.docx 106 updated annual average potable water demand projections for the 20 -year planning horizon to be used as the basis for determining the approximate size of the reservoir and corresponding WTP that would be required to meet future potable water demand. The demand will be based on existing future land use maps and corresponding population densities within the Urban Service Boundary. Consultant will rely on County staff to coordinate closely with the County's Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) representative to obtain the existing available information. Future phases and permitting activities will require additional development of population/demand projections to more closely mirror the medium BEBR and Shimberg Center population projections for the County (not included in the Phase 1 Scope of Services). The size of the reservoir will have to be confirmed in the subsequent phase (through modeling) and will only be approximated using the population/demand projections and an assumed unlimited surface water supply for the purpose of this Phase 1 feasibility study. As an open water body, a reservoir of this nature is subject to natural additions and losses such as rainfall, evaporation, and groundwater seepage. These contributing factors affect the size of a reservoir over and above the flows that are to be intentionally added via diversion from the surrounding drainage canals, and cannot be fully accounted for without detailed data review and modeling (not included in this phase). A simplified water balance approach using annual average conditions will be applied to determine sizing of up to two preliminary reservoir configurations. Limited data collection will be conducted in support of this effort. These data include stream flow records for proposed surface water supply sources (where available), along with rainfall and evaporation records for up to three nearby gages. Once the size of the required reservoir is approximated, Consultant will evaluate the following related to surface water withdrawals, storage and treatment: ■ Suitability of proposed site (proximity to existing WTP, distance from water sources, size of reservoir, etc.); ■ Property acquisition requirements [for both reservoir and pipeline rights-of-way (ROW)); ■ Permitting considerations, requirements and potential obstacles; ■ Environmental impacts, including Total Maximum Daily Load implications and availability of credits; ■ Potential surface water sources to supply the reservoir (including coordination with the local drainage district)1; ■ Reservoir sizing for utility purposes alone vs. utility and agricultural use (with agricultural needs/demands to be provided by representatives from the agricultural community rather than being developed by Consultant); ■ Consideration of drought conditions/impacts (how drought conditions will affect Tong -term operations during dry periods; quantification of available flows under drought conditions will not be provided in Phase 1); ■ Pre-treatment and treatment considerations; ■ Constructability review; and ■ Conceptual capital cost estimates (including land acquisition, reservoir construction, transmission piping construction, range of anticipated costs for surface water treatment plant2, pumping, engineering/design and O&M costs3). 'The volume and timing of surface water available for withdrawal/diversion to the proposed reservoir project cannot be quantified without detailed basin/watershed and reservoir system modeling (not included in this Scope of Services). Modeling will be performed in a subsequent authorization, if the feasibility study suggests that the property is suitable for such a project. 2Consultant will rely on past experience with surface water treatment plants to approximate a range of anticipated cost per gallon of capacity to construct the treatment facility. Accurate A-5 j11429REV5 (2).doc docx 107 capita! cost estimates cannot be developed until water quality is evaluated and design of the facility has begun. This will not include land acquisition costs for the proposed WTP. 3Operations and Maintenance costs are highly dependent on the final treatment process selected and the design of the overall system. The discussion on this cost component in Phase ! will be generalized and based on Consultant's experience with other surface water treatment facilities in Florida. More detailed estimates can be developed in subsequent Phases of the project. In addition to past project experience, Consultant shall apply unit costs obtained from previous SIRWMD and South Florida Water Management District cost guidance documents in development of the conceptual capital cost estimates. Capital cost estimates developed will apply to the proposed conceptual configurations and will include development of a range of anticipated'costs related to additional infrastructure needs, but will not address compensating storage requirements or site remediation, if needed. The property acquisition analysis will include a title search to identify the owners of the parcels required to acquire both the reservoir property and the pipeline ROWs for transmitting the diverted surface water (to the reservoir) and for transmitting the stored water to the North County WTP. It is assumed for the purpose of this analysis that the new WTP would be co -located with the existing North County WTP and no property acquisition will be required for the purpose of constructing the new WTP. This scope of services does not include a conceptual layout for the new WTP to determine if adequate land is available at the existing WTP site. This task will include development of an approximate cost estimate for acquisition of the reservoir property based on current market conditions. Consultant will enlist the assistance of the County property appraiser to aid in developing this estimate. It should be noted that the real estate market is constantly changing and any estimate developed for land acquisition is only valid for a short period of time. If plausible, Consultant will also consult with a real estate appraiser to confirm that the the cost per acre developed with the County property appraiser is consistent with market conditions. The feasibility analysis will also include a cursory review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the area to determine if any or all of the property under review falls within a flood zone. Location within a flood zone can affect the ability to fully develop the site. It should be noted that even though an approximate reservoir size and corresponding supply flow requirement can be addressed through this process for land acquisition and planning purposes, quantification of the actual flow and reliability (timing) of supply from the identified sources cannot be accurately determined without modeling. Future modeling may indicate that the available volume of water in the canal system may not be adequate to supply the full capacity required of the project. Once modeling has been completed and the available withdrawal volume from the canal system is quantified, a cost -benefit analysis should be completed to determine if the project is economically feasible as it relates to ability to meet the long-term demand. The feasibility analysis performed as part of Phase 1 will be summarized in an addendum to the 2007 AWSMP and distributed to County staff in draft format via electronic PDF. The addendum will include discussion on all items presented in Tasks 1 through 3, and listed in bullet format under Phase 1 in the background portion of this scope of services. Once comments are received by the County, the addendum will be finalized and Consultant will provide five hardcopies and a final electronic PDF version. A-6 429REV5 (2).doc.docx 108 TASK 4.0 REQUEST FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE FROM SJRWMD Consultant will initiate discussions with SJRWMD regarding funding availability and options for an alternative water supply project of this nature. Consultant will prepare for and participate in preliminary meetings with SJRWMD to discuss/identify potential funding mechanisms. The budget provided in Exhibit B reflects a level of effort of 12 hours. Additional meetings will be accommodated as budget permits. This task does not include preparation of funding applications or supporting documentation. Once a viable funding mechanism is identified, Consultant will prepare an amendment to this scope of services to complete the required application and supporting documentation, to be authorized under separate cover. TASK 5.0 MEETINGS WITH INTERESTED PARTIES AND REGULATORY AGENCIES Consultant will prepare for and participate in monthly meetings with the Soil and Water Conservation District, Agricultural Advisory Committee and Board of County Commissioners to provide updates on the analysis. The budget provided in Exhibit B includes six 1 -hour meetings to be attended by Consultant's project manager. This task also includes two meetings to be attended by Consultant's senior technical staff. Additional meetings will be accommodated as budget permits. TASK 6.0 PROJECT AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT Activities performed under this task consist of those general functions required to maintain the project on schedule, within budget, and that the quality of the work products defined within this scope is consistent with Consultant's standards and the County's expectations. Specific activities included are identified below: Subtask 6.1 Project Quality Management Consultant maintains a Quality Management System (QMS) on all projects. In accordance with the QMS Quality Procedures, a project planning and scope review meeting will be conducted at the start of the project. In addition, the Consultant's Technical Specialists will perform a quality reviews of the deliverables identified in Tasks 1 through 4. Subtask 6.2 Project Status Reports Consultant's project manager will prepare and submit monthly written status reports with each invoice for an anticipated project life of 4 months. OTHER SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS INITIAL SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant and the County agree that there are a number of future steps required to solidify the feasibility of constructing a reservoir system and corresponding treatment facility. The above Phase 1 Scope of Services provides a first step in determining whether or not the subject property is suitable for siting such a system and if acquisition of the site is feasible. If the feasibility study determines that it is beneficial for the County to acquire the property and pursue a surface water storage project, the following steps would be required (not included in this work order): ■ Detailed basin/watershed modeling to determine if adequate surface water volume is available to supply a reservoir of the required size; ■ Modeling of proposed operations of the reservoir; ■ Preliminary and final design of a reservoir and intake structure; ■ Water quality evaluation to determine the specific pre-treatment requirements; ■ Design of a WTP tailored to treating runoff/surface water; Design of the raw water pipeline; ■ Pre -application meetings with the regulatory agencies; and ■ Permit preparation and submittal. A-7 p1429REV5 (2) doc docx 109 Other items not included in this Scope of Services are: ■ Permit applications and/or fees ■ Conceptual design/layout of the new WTP • Land acquisition analysis related to the WTP itself ■ Funding applications ■ Development of population projections based on University of Florida BEBR or Shimberg Center publications COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES The County will provide historical water usage data as needed. The County will coordinate with key stakeholders to obtain input/comments on the critical project components prior to the start of the evaluation task. The County will also coordinate with the MPO to obtain existing population data within the urban service boundary. The County will provide a timely review of all deliverables and provide reasonable advance notice of meetings to allow time for preparation of materials. County staff will assist, if needed, with gaining access to the property for a field visit. The County planning department and property appraiser will assist Consultant in reviewing the demand projections developed for this study and in providing an opinion of land acquisition costs for the reservoir, respectively. TIME SCHEDULE Services will commence immediately upon receipt of notice to proceed (NTP). A draft feasibility analysis will be provided within approximately 120 days of receipt of the NTP, dependent upon the timeliness of receipt of requested data. The final feasibility analysis will be provided within 10 days of receipt of comments from the County. COMPENSATION Compensation information is provided in Exhibit B. A-8 111429REV5 (2).doc.docx 110 EXHIBIT B FEE SCHEDULE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY EVALUATION SURFACE WATER RESERVOIR FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS (PHASE I) For invoicing purposes, a summary of fees by task is provided below. The Consultant will invoice the County monthly on a time and materials basis for costs incurred during the billing cycle. Task 1 Review of AWSMP $ 1,385 Task 2 ID of and Coordination with Key Stakeholders $ 720 Task 3 Feasibility Analysis $ 54,310 Task 4 Funding Assistance SIRWMD $ 2,180 Task 5 Meetings $ 5,140 Task 6 PM/QC $ 5,670 Labor Subtotal $ 69,405 Other Direct Costs $ 1,500 Total $ 70,905 111429q0/5 (2(.doc.doc. 111 Maureen Gelfo From: Vincent Burke <vburke@ircgov.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 3:23 PM To: Maureen Gelfo Cc: Audrey Obertautsch; Arjuna Weragoda Subject: FW: Today's BOCC Meeting For CDM Work Order #11 as approved in the Board Meeting of April 22, 2014 for item 12.G.1 From: Grimaldi, Jill[mailto:GrimaldiJT@cdmsmith.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:39 PM To: Vincent Burke Cc: Grotke, Eric Subject: Today's BOCC Meeting Vinny, I just wanted to follow up with you and confirm what we agreed to at today's BOCC meeting. First, I do not think there will be any problem in considering the IRFWCD canals as potential sources. We can copy David Gunther on the data request and see what they have available for his district, just as we will with the Sebastian River Improvement District. Since actual quantification of supply won't be done until the modeling in Phase 2, we will limit the Phase 1 inclusion to coordination, discussions on potential available flow and conceptual options for redirecting flow to the potential site or sites. Second, we have already included an item under reservoir sizing task on page A-2 of the scope of services to consider the Ag demand in sizing the reservoir. We proposed to size it for just the utility needs (potable) and the utility plus ag needs. The caveat here is that we do not have adequate budget to prepare the demand numbers for the ag users. We will have to rely on the agricultural folks to provide their estimate of need coupled with what the SJRWMD has available in the regional water supply plan. Lastly, Commissioner Solari voiced his desire for us to get through Phase 1 as quickly as possible. We included 120 days in the scope, but will do our absolute best to condense the schedule and attempt to deliver the final addendum within 90 days of the Notice to Proceed. This will require quick turnaround on data needs as well as timely reviews by all parties involved when we distribute documents. Please let me know if you have any other questions or comments. Jill Jill T. Grimaldi, BCES I Principal Scientist 1 CDM Smith 1 1701 Highway A1A, Suite 301 I Vero Beach, FL 32963 I T: 772.231.4301 I F: 772.231.4332 I D: 772.360.3224 I M: 772.519.0660 I cdmsmith.com 1 ITEM 14.A.1 April 22, 2014 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 14, 2014 SUBJECT: Letter of Support for Veteran's Nursing Home Site Selection FROM: Peter D. O'Bryan, Commissioner District 4 I would like to request the Board to consider and approve a Letter of Support for St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie's efforts to build the state's 7th State Veterans' Nursing Home in St. Lucie County. Backup Provided. Attachment: Fact Sheet Letter of Support 112 State Veterans' Nursing Home Site Selection Application St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie are working together on an application to build the state's 7th State Veterans' Nursing Home in St. Lucie County. The following is a fact sheet on the County's application process and proposed site: ■ The Florida State Veterans' Homes Program provides dignity and security for Florida veterans and peace of mind for their loved ones. • The closest existing State Veterans Homes to the Treasure Coast are in Pembroke Pines to the south, Daytona Beach to the north and Port Charlotte on the west coast. A Veterans Home in St. Lucie County would be perfectly positioned to serve a wide region of East -Central Florida where no such Home currently exists. • Service area for this facility (with estimated radius of 75-miles) incorporates all of St. Lucie, Martin, Indian River, Okeechobee, and Highlands Counties, most of Palm Beach and Brevard Counties and portions of Glades, Polk, Hendry, and Osceola Counties. ■ This region includes an estimated 211,647 veterans, 112,758 of whom are over age 65. • State and federal funds will be used to build the facility. ■ County and City must provide infrastructure to property line and ensure that proposed site is environmentally sound and ready for construction. 28-acre site at end of Tradition Parkway has been selected • Parcel must be rezoned to be compatible for nursing homes • Will be state-of-the-art, 120-bed nursing home facility ■ Estimated building size of 100,000-125,000 square feet and $36.1 million construction cost IN Will employ approximately 190 personnel, both state and contract personnel • Will operate with an annual budget of over $7 million ■ Will generate millions in economic benefits • Will increase retail sales from hotels, restaurants, additional services • Will boost population due to loved ones expected to move here to live nearby ■ Will increase home sales, tax revenues • Will attract nursing workforce from other areas of the state ■ Will provide training opportunities for nursing programs, internships • Five-star facility would generate positive public relations for this region throughout the state 113 YOUR LETTERHEAD HERE CURRENT DATE HERE Frannie Hutchinson, Chair St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: St. Lucie County's Application for Florida's 7m State Veterans' Nursing Home Site Dear Commissioner Hutchinson: Indian River County's Board of County Commissioners is happy to support St. Lucie County's effort t construct the State's 7th Veterans' Nursing Home — a much-needed asset in a region where the veterans' population continues to expand. The proposed site in Port St. Lucie is within easy access to veterans and their loved ones from Indian River County. This would be a win for region, and the entire state. Our veterans currently must travel to Daytona Beach, in some cases more than 125 miles to the north,to receive end -of -life care in a State Veterans' Nursing Home. A facility in adjacent St. Lucie County would be far more convenient for those who have so proudly served our nation. This is a benefit that they y richl y The 190 jobs and the associated economic impact would also greatly help the Treasure Coast. This region has suffered badly throughout the recession, with unemployment and foreclosure rates that have beenn among the highest in the state. The benefits of such a facility here cannot be overstated. I wish you well in your application process and look forward to seeing a positive outcome to your effort to build Florida's 7th State Veterans' Nursing Home. Best regards, YOUR NAME YOUR TITLE HERE 114 Peter D. O'Bryan District 4 Wesley S. Davis Vice Chairman District 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1* --1 ZOre, District 3 Joseph E. Flescher District 2 July 14, 2014 Colonel Mike Prendergast Executive Director Florida Department of Veterans' Affairs 11351 Ulmetton Road, #311-K Largo, FL 33778-1630 Bob Solari District 5 Dear Colonel Prendergast: I'm writing to encourage you to support St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie's application to the Florida Department of VeteransAffairs to have the state's 7th State Veteran's Nursing Home built in St. Lucie County. St. Lucie County is located in the heart of the Treasure Coast a region that houses an estimated 279,971 veterans; 145,242 of whom are over age 65. The closest existing State Veterans Homes to the Treasure Coast are far away: Pembroke Pines to the south (roughly 115 miles), Daytona Beach to the north (140 miles) and Port Charlotte on the west coast (127 miles). A Veterans Home in St. Lucie County would be perfectly positioned to serve a wide region of East-Central Florida where no such home currently exists, incorporating all of St. Lucie, Martin, Indian River, Okeechobee, and Highlands Counties, most of Palm Beach and Brevard Counties and portions of Glades, Polk, Hendry, and Osceola Counties, The County and City have already secured a 28.5 -acres site located in Port St. Lucie's Tradition master -planned community that is environmentally sound and ready for construction. Additionally, the Veteran's Home would be housed in close proximity to the new state-of-the-art, 90 -bed Tradition Medical Center, operated by Martin Health Systems. Further the Vaccine & Gene Therapy Institute adjacent to the Tradition Medical Center has recently established a new Center of the Diseases of Aging which is supported by recent funding from the State of Florida's approved budget. It is contemplated that the Veteran Home's residents would be ideally situated to benefit from both the new hospital and the research of the aging population all within the same community, 1801 271" Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 //XA Colonel Prendergast Letter Page 2 of 2 July 14, 2014 This proposed 120 -bed nursing home facility will employee roughly 190 personnel, both state and contract personnel. With a Countywide population of more than 270,000, we certainly have the available workforce, We have nursing schools produced hundreds of qualified RNs and LPNs each year. St. Lucie County has had a long and storied U.S. military history. The area is known as the birthplace of the Navy SEALS, as more than 130,000 Navy officers trained for the Normandy Invasion during World War II in the early 1940s. In fact some might even say that St. Lucie County helped win VVWII — so let's keep that military heritage alive and support the approval of the new State Veteran's Nursing Home to be built in St. Lucie County. We seek your support and favorable consideration of the city and county's application. Sincerely Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Indian River County Board of County Commissioners C.C.: Governor Rick Scott Mayor JoAnn Faiella, City of Port St. Lucie Commission Chair Frannie Hutchinson, St. Lucie County Mr. Jeff Bremer, City Manager, Port St. Lucie Daniel McIntyre, Interim County Administrator, St. Lucie County Mr. Glenn Henderson, St. Lucie County Peter D. O'Bryan Chairman District 4 Wesley S. Davis Vice Chairman District. 7. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS May 1, 2014 Joseph E. Flescher District 2 Tim Zorc District 3 Bob Solari District 5 Frannie Hutchinson, Chair St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: St. Lucie County's Application for Florida's 7th State Veterans' Nursing Home Site Dear Commissioner Hutchinson: 's Indian River County's Board of County Commissioners is happy to support St. Lucie Countyeffort to construct the State's 7th Veterans' Nursing Home — a much-needed asset in a region where the veterans' population continues to expand. The proposed site in Port St. Lucie is within easy access to veterans and their loved ones from Indian River County This would be a win for region, and the entire state.. Our veterans currently must travel to Daytona Beach, in some cases more than 125 miles to the north, to receive end -of -life care in a State Veterans' Nursing Home. A facility in adjacent St. Lucie County would be far more convenient for those who have so proudly served our nation. This is a benefit that they richly deserve. The 190 jobs and the associated economic impact would also greatly help the Treasure Coast, This region has suffered badly throughout the recession, with unemployment and foreclosure rates that have been among the highest in the state. The benefits of such a facility here cannot be overstated. I wish you well in your application process and look forward to seeing a positive outcome to your effort to build Florida 's 7th State Veterans' Nursing Home. 1395_1 regards, Peter O'Bryan, Chairman Indian River County Board of County Commissioners cc, Board of County Commissioners 1801 27m Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 /,/r 3 EMERGENCY ITEM April 22, 2014 ITEM 14.8.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: --- Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 21, 2014 SUBJECT: Request for Funding for a Jurisdictional Surface Water Management g ment Plan FROM: Wesley S. Davis Commissioner, District 1 I kindly request your consideration for discussion regarding applying for funding jurisdictional Surface Water Management Plan, which funding has been brought to of y attention. Senator Joe Negron, ught my Representative Patrick Murphy have announced a $200 million lative Steve usin saf St and U.S. will likely be available for a project to support the health of the Indian River Lagoon. Revenue Additionally, at the Indian River Soil and Water Conservationg on. 15, 2014, Doug Bournique, St. Johns River Water Management DistricBoameeting one Member and Executive Vice President of the Indian River Citrus League, advised there general revenue funds available for issues related to surface water managementein counties adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon (focus within Stuart to Merritt Island). n request for funding of a surface water plan is to be submitted before the LegislativeA Session ends on May 15, 2014. g Le Mr. Bournique will be available to expand on this topic and will provide su I information at Tuesday's meeting, April 22, 2014. pp emental WSD:mlp //z/A Emergency Agenda Item BCC AGENDA April 22, 2014 ITEM 14.0(1) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 16, 2014 SUBJECT: All Aboard Florida (AAF) FROM: Commissioner Bob Solari All Aboard Florida continues to speed down the tracks. Updates includin on the April 18, 2014 All Aboard discussion at the TCRPC. 9 report Thank you. 3e3—Q3---- 115 Y AUDITION TO AGENDA APRIL 22, 2014 AGENDA ITEM: 14.E.1 April 22, 2014 ITEM 14.E.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 17, 2014 SUBJECT: Update on the April 17th Florida Municipal Power FROM: Agency Meeting Tim Zorc Commissioner, District 3 I would like to provide an update on the Florida Municipal Power Agency Meeting in Orlando, Florida held on Thursday, April 17, 2014. p //G April 15, 2014 The Honorable Richard Winger Mayor of Vero Beach 1053 20th Place Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Mayor Winger: Thank you for your leadership in meeting with FMPA earlier this month. While we are disappointed that FMPA specifically requested FPL not attend the meeting, we do appreciate your efforts to move the sale forward. After reviewing the minutes of the April 2nd meeting between the City and FMPA, I want to follow up on FMPA's desire to have an FPL guaranty to satisfy the City's contingent liabilities. First, I find it difficult to believe that FMPA actually expects FPL to enter into an unconditional and unlimited guaranty. Not only is it unfair to put such an onerous burden on FPL's existing customers, but such a requirement is not commercially reasonable in any transaction and no responsible counterparty could agree to provide that kind of guaranty. We have always agreed with FMPA leadership that FMPA members and bondholders should not be disadvantaged by the sale of Vero's electric system and have worked diligently to structure a deal that meets or exceeds that test. However it is clear that this latest reuest b FMPA for an unlimited and indefinite FPL guaranty, in addition to benefits the City is already proposing actua f y puts 'fP ' members and bondholders in a ar superior position than the currently enjoy today. This new approach Gy MMtT' on y a. .s a..tiona comexr o t e transaction conducive to the parties reaehin an agreement. After many weeks of requesting that FMPA meet with FPL, I did finally speak with Nick Guarriello on Friday. I expressed FPL's concern on issuing any such guaranty and my hope that FMPA will eventually agree to meet with FPL so we can seek a more reasonable and commercially viable solution. I would also like to clarify comments made about the $52 million proposal. In February, with the intent to move the transaction forward, FPL accepted FMPA's request for a lump sum payment of $52 million to compensate them for agreeing to the sale. FMPA offered and FPL accepted, subject to technical issues that we believed, based on our previous conversations with FMPA, would be acceptable to them. To be clear, we have not taken that deal off the table and FPL will stand by its agreement if the City and its customers would like to pursue it. Based on our calculations, we continue to believe that such a large payment more than fairly compensates FMPA members for any perceived risk they hold and that bondholders would actually be better off from both a credit and financial perspective. Unfortunately, based on our reading of the minutes, it appears FMPA is no longer willing to honor that offer and would instead like for the City and FPL to pursue a separate agreement with OUC. Again, in an effort to accommodate FMPA's wishes, we are in active and constructive discussions with OUC to try and identify another path forward. Again Mayor, all of us at FPL appreciate your efforts to move this process forward and we remain hopeful that your determination to have productive discussions will result in all of the parties being allowed to come to the table so we can work together to negotiate in good faith the remaining issues. We look forward to continuing to work together with you to bring lower electric bills to Vero Beach customers. Florida Power & Light Company ears punitive in nature anis, un ortunat y, not 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, FL 33408 Thank you, and please let me know how we can continue to support the City's efforts in addressing FMPA's concerns. Si Sam Forre Vice President, Energy Marketing & Trading //4 Subject: FW: we will be gathering the information Date: Thursday, April 17, 2014 11:23:39 AM ET From: Bob Solari To: henry.stephens@scripps.com Henry: Monday, April 21, 2014 2:50:58 PM ET 1145,1. Glenn Heran realized that the only way to free the citizens of Indian River County, including Vero Beach residents such as myself, from the high electric bills sent out each month by the COVB electric utility is to shine the light directly on the unelected shadow bureaucracy known as the FMPA. The shadow bureaucracy known as the FMPA is now evidently preparing to strike back! Swindle, the shadow bureaucracy's counsel, is evidently trying to dig up information to use against Indian River County's citizen activist Glenn Heran. This is not only an attack on Mr. Heran but an attack on our democratic system. Everyone is aware of the chilling effect that threatened legal action can have on an ordinary citizen's actions, especially when threatened by a nameless bureaucracy about which little is known except that it has very deep pockets. This preliminary volley of what may well be a more sinister game is very disturbing to all Americans who appreciate the need to have as many citizens as possible actively participating in our democratic process. It is unfortunate for all residents of Indian River County that the shadow bureaucracy known as the FMPA can not come out into the light and discuss the sale of the COVB electric system in an open and transparent manner. It is because shadow bureaucracies often fail to engage in open and transparent dialogue when important issues need to be discussed that they are such a danger to flourishing democracies. Thank you and Happy Easter, Rot 5614,a. 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 772-226-1438 bsolari anircgov.com From: Jason Brown <jbrownWircgov.com> Date: Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:55 AM To: Bob Solari <bsolari@ ircgov.com> Cc: Joe Baird <jbairdPircgov.com> Subject: RE: we will be gathering the information Per your request, lease see the attached email. Jason E. Brown Director — Office of Management & Budget Indian River County Board of Commissioners 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FI 32960 (772) 226-1214 FAX (772) 770-5331 jbrown(c,ircgov.com /4-3 Page 1 of 3 EMERGENCY AGENDA ITEM APRIL 22, 2014 ITEM 14.E.2 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 21, 2014 SUBJECT: FY 2014/15 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Beach Funding Assistance FROM: Tim Zorc Commissioner, District 3 I would like to request consideration from the Board for a Resolution in support of FY 2014/15 FDEP reimbursement funding for Indian River County's Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project. Backup Provided. Attachment: Letter from the Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory Committee Talking Points — FDEP Local Government Funding Assistance Program Justification for Reimbursement Funding 1-1Z2 -/if AoG. /y AD am. 2 Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project 2010 - 2012 Talking Points - FDEP Local Government Funding Assistance Program Justification for Reimbursement Funding FY 2014/2015 Funding Assistance Program Eligibility — Rule 62B-36.003 in order to be eligible for the Funding Assistance Program, projects must be sponsored by a local government and comply with the following criteria: • Project areas must be on a sandy shoreline in Florida fronting the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, or the Straits of Florida. • Projects must address shoreline designated as "critically eroded" in the Department's most recent Critical Erosion Report. • Beach Management projects shall be accessible to the general public and access shall be maintained for the life of the project. Inlet management projects generally do not have to provide public access. • Projects must be consistent with the State's Strategic Beach Management Plan and be included in the Statewide Long Range Budget Plan. • Projects shall be conducted in a manner that encourages cost -savings, fosters regional coordination of projects, optimizes management of sediments and project performance, protects the environment, mitigates impacts caused by modified inlets and provides long-term solutions. • Appropriate feasibility studies or analysis shall be required before design or construction of new projects. Analysis must determine that the project avoids or minimizes adverse impacts and is cost effective. • Beach management projects authorized by Congress for federal financial participation are eligible. Local government entities shall pursue federal appropriations to the maximum extent possible in order to proportionally reduce state and local project costs. • Local sponsors must submit an Annual Funding Request and Local Long Range Budget Plan for projects expected to be initiated or continued in the fiscal year upon notification by the Department. Please Note: Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Beaches and Mines Funding Assistance staff has determined that 100% of the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project (Project) is eligible for State cost sharing. Therefore, the Project complies with Rule 62B-36.003 and qualifies for the maximum cost share ratio of 50% State — 50% County. /4 -5 Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project 2010 - 2012 Talking Points - FDEP Local Government Funding Assistance Program Justification for Reimbursement Funding FY 2014/2015 a 151 to the State of Florida o Large scale beach project using an upland borrow source alternative o Turtle Test Plan to qualify upland borrow source material • The permits that authorized construction of the Sector 3 Project required that the upland sand sources used for construction be vetted via a Sea Turtle Nesting Test Plan o Developed new permit required sediment QA/QC protocols • Stimulated state and local economy o Planning, Design, Construction, and Monitoring of the Project utilized 14 local contractors • Mitigated downdrift erosional impacts attributable to an inlet o The purpose of the Project was to offset historical sediment deficits attributable to Sebastian Inlet. • Restored critically eroded beaches • Lowered offshore bid proposals Statewide o The bids received for the Sector 3 Project were lower than the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost, This is likely due to the additional competition that occurred due to the inclusion of the upland sand mines. Other projects around the state have bid projects similarly to the Sector 3 Project allowing the contractor to utilize either an upland or offshore sand source, • Proved that an upland sand source is a viable borrow source alternative for beach restoration projects • Developed new mining screening techniques to maximize production efficiencies o 88% of dredged sand processed was beach compatible Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project 2010 - 2012 Talking Points - FDEP Local Government Funding Assistance Program Justification for Reimbursement Funding FY 2014/2015 • Project demonstrated how careful design and construction could result in no measurable impacts to sea turtles and nearshore hardbottom. o The biological and physical monitoring conducted to date indicate that as designed the Project has not resulted in any measurable impacts to sea turtles and nearshore hardbottom • Through an inter -local government agreement the project was constructed in cooperation between Indian River County and Sebastian Inlet District o Demonstrating significant cost savings to taxpayers • The Project is an example for other communities exploring use of Upland Sand borrow source alternatives o Project has generated positive interest from other local governments, State and Federal regulatory agencies, coastal engineering consultants, and the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association o Recently, Collier County, Fl constructed a Truck Haul — Upland Sand borrow project. This project implemented the lessons learned from Indian River County, not limited to sand quality/processing techniques, and construction logistics, to complete a very successful project. The Collier County project was also recently presented/discussed during the 2014 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology. //,‘ - 7 BEACH 8, SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Christian Hendricks, Chairman David Barney, Vice Chairman Francisco San Miguel Mark Tripson Amelia Graves Richard Gilhnor Joe Connors Joel Tyson Tout Cadden Bob Anderson William Ferrell March 11, 2014 Joe Negron, Senator 306 Senate Office Bldg. 402 South Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100 Debbie Mayfield, Representative 317 House Office Bldg. 404 South Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 Thad Altman, Senator 314 Senate Office Bldg. 404 South Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-1100 Re: Letter of Support — FY 2014/2015 Reimbursement Funding for Indian River County's Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project (Wabasso Beach Restoration) Dear Legislators: The Indian River County Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory Committee respectfully requests your support and assistance by bringing to the attention of the Legislature for their consideration, a special and separate appropriation under the statewide beach management for FY 2014/2015 for Indian River County. A special appropriation is specifically needed to address the lack of State reimbursement to Indian River County for the construction of the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project (Wabasso Beach Restoration) between 2010 and 2012. Funds requested for FY 2014/15 will be used to reimburse 50% of the eligible project costs not currently cost shared with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The total project costs incurred by Indian River County to date are $13 Million; of which 50% or $6.5 Million are eligible for State reimbursement. For the FY 2014/2015 FDEP Local Government Funding Assistance Program Indian River County ranked 19th among all the funding requests under this program. The Governor's recommended budget for FY 2014/2015 includes only $25 Million for statewide projects. In order for the Wabasso Beach Restoration Project to receive reimbursement the State would need to appropriate over $39 Million. Enclosed in this letter are several talking points identifying how the project demonstrated innovation at its best and how one County can take a leap into the future of beach restoration with the use of upland sand sources. We believe that Indian River County is a pioneer to beach restoration and should be reimbursed for our and the State's successes of this project. 1801 27" Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 • Joe Negron, Senator Thad Altman, Senator Debbie Mayfield, Representative March 11, 2014 Page Two The Indian River County Beach and Shore Preservation Advisory Committee respectfully requests your assistance to work in concert with your colleagues in the Legislature to pass a special and separate appropriation of an additional $14 Million under the statewide beach management for FY 2014/2015 to reimburse Indian River County. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Please let us know if there is anything you may need to further our request. If you have any questions please feel free to contact the County's coastal engineer, James Gray at 772-226-1344. Sincerely, CjGin rte:.. Christian Hendricks, Chairman //6�9 13(i< .1 1) 1 COUP IT C(}rMISSION' RS April 25, 2014 7'he 1 lonorable Joe Negron 401 South Monroe Street I 'al lah<asc:e, 1'1 32399-1100 I)car Senator Negron: On behalf of Indian River Count\. 1 wanted to thank \ ou for all of your efforts in protecting the Financial interests of Indian River County, the Treasure Coast, and protecting the Indian River Lagoon. As Chairman of the Senate Appropriations, you are the gatekeeper to the State of Florida's collcrs. a position of great responsibility and challenges. Please know Indian River Countv appreciates your leadership and dedication. 11 I can be or any assistance to you. please do not hesitate to contact me at my office at 772-226-14M or on my cell phone at 772-538-5522. Again. your efforts are yery much appreciated. Sincerely, Joseph A. Baird County -Administrator OFFICE Of' THE COUNTY .-iDMINISTR-1 TUI? INDIA:y RI1 ER COL; NIT 1801 27th Street, A ero Reach, Fl 32960-3388 p11oNH:: 772-226-1408 - FAX: 772-978-1822