Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/01/2014r PROCLAMATION HONORING MICHAEL K. VERNON RECIPIENT OF THE CHIEF OPERATOR OF THE YEAR AWARD WHEREAS, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners are dedicated to life, liberty, happiness, and the pursuit of quality drinking water for all their residents; and WHEREAS, Michael K. Vernon, an Indian River County resident, employele, and Chief Operator -South County Water Treatment Plant with the Indian River County, Department of Utility Services, is a valuable asset in the passionate commitment of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2014, Michael K. Vernon, received the Southeast Desalting Association (SEDA), Operator of the Year Award. As a member of SEDA, Michael is dedicated to the improvement of water quality. He is concerned with environmental reg Iations and legislation, process design, plant operations, maintenance, and research and devel pment. He exhibits a tremendous knowledge of reverse osmosis operations, treatment pr cesses and problem solving skills; and WHEREAS, Michael K. Vernon, was selected from a diverse group of his contemporaries for this distinction and honor. He is well respected by all, is a loyal, dedicated employee, and a vital supporter of citizen information and awareness. The Indian River County's Annual Water Quality Reporting is a prime example. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD O COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board c ngratulates Michael K. Vernon on this distinctive honor, and thanks him for his valuable con ributions on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners and the residents of Indian River Cou ty. Adopted this 1st day of July, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INpIM4 RIVER COUNT FLORIDA N. N; Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairma Wesley S. Dgvis, Vice Chairman E. Flescher Bob Solari Ti �J' rt PROCLAMATION HONORING TOBY TURNER ON HIS RETIREMENT FRO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION RS DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES/FIRE RESCU WHEREAS, Toby Turner retired from Indian River County Fire Rescue effective June 30, 2014; and WHEREAS, Toby Turner began his Fire Rescue career with the Vero Beach Volunteer Fire Department He was employed with the City of Vero Beach Fire Department on March 7, 1978, as a Firefighter and on April 5, 1981, he became a Firefighter -EMT with South Indian River County Fire District. On March 7, 1982, he became an Engineer-EMT.n July 6, 1990, he became a Lieutenant -EMT which is the position he held until his retire mnt. Toby Turner has received numerous letters of appreciation during his career. He layed an instrumental part within the Indian River County Fire Fighters' Fair for the last t irtyfour years and has been the General Manager for last eighteen years. WHEREAS, Toby Turner served this County and the Public with distinction and sel essness. During his thirty-six years of service, he was dedicated and his work was greatly ap reciated by the employer and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE 17' PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDL4N RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board 'applauds Toby Turner's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to exp Tess their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last thirty- six years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend A heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors! Adopted this 1st day of July 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDL4N RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman 1 2 may, " may, This is to certify that Tod), D. Turner is Fiere6y presented this g@irement Award for outstanding performance and faithfutserrice to Indian fiver County Board of County Commissioners For thirty-siocyears of service On this 30th day ofdune 2014 John B!irictor of Bme#g�rncy Services Peter D. O'Bryan Board of County Commissioner, Chairman • PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF JULY, 2014, AS RIVER KIDZ MONTH 5G WHEREAS, the River Kidz of St. Lucie and Indian River County was established to educate our youth and allow them to be ambassadors for our water and marine life; and WHEREAS, the River Kidz membership has grown to over 30 members and has participated in beach clean-ups, oyster bagging and bag deployment. The River Kidz have gathered signatures and spoken before Commissions, Legislators and our Federal Government; and WHEREAS. The River Kidz' interest and impact have already begun to affect and change minds within our communities with a powerful message we could all learn from; and WHEREAS, the River Kidz' founder, Katy Lewis, and her helpers, Nyla Pipes arid Missy Tougus, have worked at setting up interesting events, helped line up a spoil island they could adopt and clean, and made a community proud of their efforts; and WHEREAS, River Kidz Month is a time to reflect on the future we are leaving our children, as well as an avenue for all children to participate, and have a voice in their future. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board does hereby designate the month of July, 2014, as River Kidz Month. Adopted this 1St day of July, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, RIVER CQUNTY, f�L,QF2IDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari Joseph E. Flescher T Lorc POCLAMATION DESIGNATING JULY, 2014, AS MARINE DEBRIS REMOVAL MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 5p WHEREAS, Marine Cleanup Initiative Inc., the Operations Director, The Board of Directors, the Advisory Board, and the hundreds of volunteer divers, boat captains, kayaks and paddle boarders have operated for thirteen years to remove marine debris such as: Monofilament fishing line, casing nets, cargo nets, batteries, anchors, chain, rope, bottles, cans, and fishing gear from our Indian River Lagoon Estuary; and WHEREAS, these efforts are accomplished by volunteers using their own time, their own equipment and risking their own lives to provide this needed public service to protect our most important natural resource; and WHEREAS, these efforts save thousands of birds, fish, turtles and other aquatic life from certain death through the elimination of all debris including ghost fishing items such as abandoned traps and nets; and WHEREAS, Marine Cleanup Initiative Inc. is involved in all the clean-ups along the water and our spoil islands as well as clearing invasive species such as Lionfish from our waters; and WHEREAS, Marine Cleanup Initiative, Inc., has brought national and international interest to our area through advocacy, volunteerism and national awards for service; all while removing over 425,000 pounds of debris. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board does hereby designate the month of July, 2014, as MARINE DEBRIS REMOVAL MONTH IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY and encourage all citizens and businesses to participate in activities which will assist in the elimination of the accumulation of hazardous debris in our waterways through best practices of disposal. Adopted this 1st day of July, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN RIVER COUNTY,4 LORIDA Pete D. O'Bryan, Chairman Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman seph . Flescher 1 0 u _ 0 0 0 5.1 �. 2_ Dengue in Florida, 2009 - 2013 Imported cases Locally -acquired cases N M N L0 at0_ N M_ v O O O O O >- N N N N N 53 M .5 L) June 3-4, 2014 5.5 O as., O Q O = N Q' 2 t Q E VI 12 E O Q Q O N -0 _ 8 O O viO sl N L O" c O VI _ O ›, L U =()) .a -.4.- 4-5 O i u O.; • ztO Fp = A E VZs = Q CI v 0 0 u IRMCD website: www.irmosquito.com 5 51 July 1, 2014 INFORMATIONAL ITEM IA- INDIAN k INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 20, 2014 SUBJECT: Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board Appointment FROM: Misty L. Purse) Commissioner Assistant, Districts 1 & 5 The Career Source Research Coast has appointed Joe Azevedo, Operations Manager, Indian River Career Center, as the representative of the Regional Workforce Development Board to the Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board. F \BCC\AII Committees\TDLCB\Appointments - Resignations\TDLCB Appointment 2014 RWDB.doc 6 From: Desiree Gorman Imailto:dgorman(a)careersourcerc.com) Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 1:29 PM To: Phil Matson Cc: Jose Azevedo; Tracey McMorris Subject: Indian River Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged Phil: Thank you for taking the time to talk earlier. As mentioned, with recent staffing changes and reorganization. we would like to assign a designee and alternate to the Indian River Local Coordinating Board for the Transportation Disadvantaged. Beginning today, your new contact will be: Joe Azevedo, Operations Manager Indian River Career Center 1880 82I'd Avenue. Suite 102 Vero Beach, Florida 32966 (866) 482-4473 x. 202 Fax: (772) 770-5684 jazevedoCa)careersourcerc.com The alternate contact is: Tracey McMorris, Director of Field Operations St. Lucie Career Center 584 NW University Boulevard, Suite 300 Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 (866) 482-4473 x. 528 Fax. (877) 223-5890 tmcmorris(c�careersourcerc.com If possible, please reply back to this email with a complete list of meeting dates currently set along with times and locations. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully. Desiree Gorman Senior Executive Management Assistant Ilk Administrative Office 584 NW University Blvd. Suite #100 Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 Phone: (866) 482-4473 x. 428 Fax: 866-314-6580 dgormanAcareersourcerc.com www.careersourcerc.com 7 INFORMATION ITEM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Stan Boling, Al ICP Develo ent Director FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: June 17, 2014 RE: Update on Status of Grant Award Agreement with the State Division of Historical Resources for Design and Permitting of Restoration of the Archie Smith Fish House The following information is provided for the Board's regular meeting of July 1, 2014. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In 2007, the Board of County Commissioners purchased the historic Archie Smith Fish House under the County's environmental lands program. The subject waterfront property consists of approximately 1.15 acres located at 1740 North Indian River Drive within the northern city limits of Sebastian. Structures on the Archie Smith Fish House property consist of the main (principal) house, a boat dock and an ice house (on the dock). Those structures were substantially damaged in the 2004 hurricanes and are in disrepair. When the County acquired the property in 2007, plans were to rehabilitate the main house for use as a small museum, repair the dock and provide boat access, and restore the ice house. Since acquiring the property, the County has removed a dilapidated residence from a portion of the property west of Indian River Drive and has secured the remaining structures to prevent further deterioration. In 2012, county staff submitted an application to the State Division of Historical Resources (DHR) for a small-scale matching grant to develop detailed restoration plans and construction drawings for restoration of the fish house and associated structures. In 2013, DHR notified county staff that the 2012 grant application was approved for state funding, and the County entered into a grant award agreement with DHR for the project. The grant project entails the County hiring a historic preservation architect and engineer to develop detailed restoration plans, prepare construction drawings, submit permit applications, and produce bid documents for restoration of the Archie Smith Fish House and associated structures. The total design 1 8 project cost is estimated to be $99,000.00, with the County's 50% cost -share estimated at $49,500.00. The following table provides a breakdown of estimated costs by project elements: Archie Smith Fish House Restoration Design Project Project Elements Estimated Cost DHR Cost (50%) County Cost (50%) Structural Assessment $25,000 $12,500 $12,500 Mechanical Engineering $7,000 $3,500 $3,500 Architectural Restoration Plans $45,000 $22,500 $22,500 Permit Applications and Bid Documents $22,000 $11,000 $11,000 TOTAL $99,000 $49,500 $49,500 The Grant Award Agreement is for a one year period effective July 1, 2013, with a requirement that all grant funds and match be expended and all project work shall be completed by June 30, 2014, with an opportunity for a one-time 30 -day extension. Current Status of Project On March 4, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners approved selection of Atelier AEC, Inc. as the architectural/engineering firm to carry out the design project. Since that time, Atelier has conducted an on-site evaluation of the structures, has met and coordinated with county and city staff, as well as with County Historian Ruth Stanbridge, and has produced preliminary restoration design drawings (see attached). 30 -Day Grant Extension Atelier AEC, Inc. is on schedule to complete its design, permit applications, and bid document tasks within the grant timeframe. Notwithstanding, to allow additional time in the event of unforeseen circumstances, staff requested a one-time 30 -day extension to the grant, which DHR has approved. RECOMMENDATION No action is requested or recommended; this item is presented as an informational update to the Board. ATTACHMENTS 1. Preliminary restoration design drawings. 2. Amendment One to Grant Award Agreement. APPROVED: FOR: BY: July 1, 2014 2 M:\LAAC\Archie Smith Fish House\Archie Smith FH 2014 Hist Grant App\DHR grant agree exten BCC staff rpt for 7-1-14.doc 9 I.R.County App ved Date Admin. Cs 6 5-r ill Legal ```` V' v\ Budget Dept. .9/ 9 /y Risk Mgr. 2 M:\LAAC\Archie Smith Fish House\Archie Smith FH 2014 Hist Grant App\DHR grant agree exten BCC staff rpt for 7-1-14.doc 9 ? g o ui 6` i Ice Rouse Plan - Existing / Demo ARCHIE SMITH FISH HOUSE RESTORATION Sebastian, Florida L c< 10 II I ina l q o s s m ; et A s Fish Nouse Elevations ARCHIE SMITH FISH HOUSE RESTORATION Sebastian, Florida 11 > ;POP' H rTlozrr 12 P 's .17. :I ce I -louse Elevations ARCHIE SMITH FISH HOUSE RESTORATION Sebastian, Florida > ;POP' H rTlozrr 12 :4 1, aa T1 a - r �e t t y i o— :40` 9 ' m s € F eh House Flan- Exist ra / Demo ARCHIE SMITH FISH HOUSE RESTORATION Sebastian, Florida 13 1, Li rIce .1: f i-;cuse Plan - Existing / Demo ARCHIE SMITH FISH HOUSE RESTORATION Sebastian, Florida 14 Fish i-ioLJse Flan - Froposeo ARCHIE SMITH FISH HOUSE RESTORATION Sebastian, Florida 15 T O 16 s s ice House Fla, - Froposeo Dy � a , O l w: `x ARCHIE SMITH FISH HOUSE RESTORATION a i 9 .; 0` -y 4 Sebastian, Florida 16 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE Grant No.: SJ429 This AMENDMENT to the Grant Award Agreement dated October 29, 2013, hereinafter referred to as the Agreement, between the State of Florida. Depamnent of State, Division of Historical Resources, hereinafter referred to as the Department, and Indian River County. hereinafter referred to as the Grantee, relative to the Archie Smith Fish House Restoration Project, hereinafter referred to as the Project, shall be effective when properly executed by the parties hereto, and shall be made a part of the original Agreement. The Grantee has requested an extension to the project deadline. These requested revisions have been reviewed by the Department and have been found to be in accordance with current regulations. 1) Section 111. A, of the Agreement is amended as follows: Delete: This grant becomes effective on July 1, 2013 and ends on June 30, 2014. This agreement must be signed by the grantee and received in Department offices by November 15, 2013, to avoid forfeiture of award. Project initiation (encumbrance of funds), as evidenced by grantee execution of a binding contract for all or pan of the Approved Scope of Work in Section 1 above, shall occur by January 31, 2013, except as allowed in C. and D. below. All grant funds and match shall be expended and all project work shall be completed by June 30, 2014. except as allowed in E. below. Replace with: This grant becomes effective on July 1, 2013 and ends on July 31, 2014. This agreement must he signed by the grantee and received in Department offices by November 15, 2013, to avoid forfeiture of award. Project initiation (encumbrance of funds), as evidenced by grantee execution of a binding contract for all or part of the Approved Scope of Work in Section 1 above, shall occur by January 31, 2014, except as allowed in C. and D. below. All grant funds and match shall be expended and all project work shall be completed by July 31, 2014, except as allowed in L. below. 2) Section 111, 1. A of the Agreement is amended as follows: Delete: I. Project Schedule; Deliverables and Timeline: First Payment July 1, 2013 to October 30. 2013 a. Grantee will sign and execute the Grant Award Agreement b. Grantee will draft and finalize Requests for Proposals and select a project architect and engineer Second Payment November 1, 2013 to January 31, 2014 a. Grantee will execute all contracts pending prior approval from DHR b. Grantee will send a news release to local print and electronic media identifying the project's specifics as required in IV.A.1 below c. Consultant will conduct a facility analysis and structural evaluation, and research and document the history of the structures, The Consultant will provide an analysis and history report to the County, to be review and submitted for approNal from DHR Third Payment February 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014 a. Consultant will develop detailed construction drawings and bid specifications, to be submitted to DHR for review and approval Fourth Payment April 1, 2013 10 June 30, 2014 a, Consultant will obtain permit approvals for restoration b. Grantee will submit a press release to local print and electronic media upon completion of the project Replace with: Project Schedule; Deliserables and Timeline: First reporting period July 1, 2013 to October 30, 2013 a. Grantee will sign and execute the Grant Award Agreement b. Grantee will draft and finalize Requests for Proposals and select a project architect and engineer Second reporting period November 1, 2013 to January 31, 2014 a. Grantee will execute all contracts pending prior approval from DHR b. Grantee will send a news release to local print and electronic media identifying the project's specifics as required in IV.A.1 below c. Consultant will conduct a facility analysis and structural evaluation, and research and document the history of the structures The Consultant will provide an analysis and history report to the County, to be review and submitted for approval from DHR ATTACHMENT 2 17 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27'x' Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: June 12, 2014 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS June 7, 2014 to June 12, 2014 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of June 7, 2014 to June 12, 2014. Attachment: DB: MS 19 CHECK NBR 313013 313014 313015 313016 313017 313018 313019 313020 313021 313022 313023 313024 313025 313026 313027 313028 313029 313030 313031 313032 313033 313034 313035 313036 313037 313038 313039 313040 313041 313042 313043 313044 313045 313046 313047 313048 313049 313050 313051 313052 313053 313054 313055 313056 313057 313058 313059 313060 313061 313062 313063 313064 313065 313066 313067 313068 313069 313070 CHECKS WRITTEN CK DATE VENDOR 6/9/2014 SHEILA S VOTZI 6/9/2014 JOHN GLENTON 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/9/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6/12/201, DON REID FORD 6/12/201, TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 6/12/201. VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 6/12/201. COPYCO INC 6/12/201• CHISHOLM CORP OF VERO 6/12/201, VELDE FORD INC 6/12/201 AT&T WIRELESS 6/12/201 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 6/12/201 DELTA SUPPLY CO AMOUNT 50.00 300.00 58.21 101.66 31.15 29.89 59.95 23.98 50.09 102.53 28.86 39.86 14.00 67.74 29.85 18.07 8.95 73.11 41.33 30.71 29.30 35.64 71.33 80.69 35.18 19.70 3.15 49.41 44.38 88.57 35.61 32.46 87.18 60.57 83.05 80.57 35.30 86.75 29.32 67.01 460.28 27.45 30.37 34.85 51.11 83.05 37.66 24.79 88.67 20,845.00 6,769.33 193.60 18.95 7,475.96 110.32 100.00 1,607.24 162.96 1 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 313071 6/12/201• GRAINGER 648.52 313072 6/12/201. KELLY TRACTOR CO 44.80 313073 6/12/201, AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 124.00 313074 6/12/201, AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 127.03 313075 6/12/201, AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 3,007.20 313076 6/12/201• DAILY COURIER SERVICE 317.00 313077 6/12/201. GAYLORD BROTHERS INC 190.87 313078 6/12/201• ACTION DIESEL 75.00 313079 6/12/201. PHYSIO CONTROL INC 771.70 313080 6/12/201. JIMMYS TREE SERVICE 6,400.00 313081 6/12/201• HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD 1,835.52 313082 6/12/201. BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 270.74 313083 6/12/201• PETES CONCRETE 2,400.00 313084 6/12/201, VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 239.60 313085 6/12/201• CENTER POINT INC 160.56 313086 6/12/201• MORNING STAR PERSONILIZED APPAREL INC 123.50 313087 6/12/201. DELL MARKETING LP 12,775.92 313088 6/12/201, GENERAL PART INC 278.20 313089 6/12/201. GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 49.00 313090 6/12/201• BAKER & TAYLOR INC 1,074.25 313091 6/12/201• BRANDTS APPLIANCE SERVICE INC 317.14 313092 6/12/201. MIDWEST TAPE LLC 313.82 313093 6/12/201• NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC 23.01 313094 6/12/201, HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER INC PA 45.00 313095 6/12/201• K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY 118.69 313096 6/12/201. GO COASTAL INC 187.35 313097 6/12/201. DLT SOLUTIONS LLC 1,475.65 313098 6/12/201• RIVER PARK ASSOCIATES 281.00 313099 6/12/201, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 2,756.83 313100 6/12/201, CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 145.66 313101 6/12/201. CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 410.00 313102 6/12/201, CITY OF VERO BEACH 69,118.40 313103 6/12/201• STEPHEN WOJTASZEK 41.84 313104 6/12/201, INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC 5,575.42 313105 6/12/201• UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 17.90 313106 6/12/201. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND 159.00 313107 6/12/201, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 20.00 313108 6/12/201. B/C B/S OF FL ADM FEE 33,416.55 313109 6/12/201• JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 1,463.05 313110 6/12/201• ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF INC 444.60 313111 6/12/201. ACUSHNET COMPANY 1,824.22 313112 6/12/201, AQUAGENIX 148.00 313113 6/12/201. IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5,557.91 313114 6/12/201. FEDERAL EXPRESS 10.87 313115 6/12/201• ATHENS TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS INC 10,317.00 313116 6/12/201. RIVERFRONT HOTEL LLC 430.00 313117 6/12/201. RIVERFRONT HOTEL LLC 430.00 313118 6/12/201• MANPOWER 484.80 313119 6/12/201, VERO HERITAGE INC 545.00 313120 6/12/201, CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 45.18 313121 6/12/201, SUBSTANCE AWARENESS COUNCIL OF IRC INC 2,280.00 313122 6/12/201. FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 14,434.63 313123 6/12/201 • FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 1,696.83 313124 6/12/201. ACUSHNET COMPANY 743.36 313125 6/12/201. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 129.10 313126 6/12/201• INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 129.10 313127 6/12/201 • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 129.10 313128 6/12/201• GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER INC 2,282.34 313129 6/12/201• STATE ATTORNEY 200.00 313130 6/12/201• CITY OF FELLSMERE 213.57 2 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 313131 6/12/201. NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE COAST 22,812.83 313132 6/12/201. CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PALM BCH 2,025.80 313133 6/12/201. FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 25.00 313134 6/12/201• HOMELESS FAMILY CENTER INC 4,636.92 313135 6/12/201. GERALDAYOUNG SR 90.00 313136 6/12/201, ALAN C KAUFFMANN 235.00 313137 6/12/201. THE FLORIDA BAR 300.00 313138 6/12/201, KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL INC 9,069.71 313139 6/12/201. COMCAST 113.15 313140 6/12/201• AIRGAS CARBONIC INC 2,616.25 313141 6/12/201. INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 162.00 313142 6/12/201, BRIDGE DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC 15,071.40 313143 6/12/201• VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 1,443.00 313144 6/12/201. LELCO FB TALLAHASSEE LLL 97.00 313145 6/12/201. EDWARD J MAJCHER 6.09 313146 6/12/201. JAMES WILLIAM OOLEY 60.00 313147 6/12/201, FORT PIERCE HOUSING AUTHORITY 711.50 313148 6/12/201, CELICO PARTNERSHIP 1,694.45 313149 6/12/201, CONTROL SYSTEMS DESIGN INC 6,250.00 313150 6/12/201• VAN WAL INC 15.00 313151 6/12/201, JOSEPH W VASQUEZ 150.00 313152 6/12/201• PARGAS 345.00 313153 6/12/201• GARY L EMBREY 40.00 313154 6/12/201. JOSE RIVERA 80.00 313155 6/12/201• MICHAEL NIXON P E 150.00 313156 6/12/201. METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 180.45 313157 6/12/201• CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 130.50 313158 6/12/201, KENNY CAMPBELL JR 80.00 313159 6/12/201. PETER OBRYAN 15.59 313160 6/12/201, JOHNNY B SMITH 150.00 313161 6/12/201, HALL -MARK FIRE APPARATUS INC 19,440.00 313162 6/12/201, HOOVER PUMPING SYSTEMS 5,607.44 313163 6/12/201, GLOBALSTAR USA 119.50 313164 6/12/201, CHARLES A WALKER 80.00 313165 6/12/201. DANIEL IOFFREDO 40.00 313166 6/12/201, BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 210.21 313167 6/12/201. MARINCO BIOASSAY LABORATORY INC 2,950.00 313168 6/12/201. KRISTIN DANIELS 177.82 313169 6/12/201• STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE 17,282.60 313170 6/12/201• K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 850.00 313171 6/12/201, YOUTH GUIDANCE DONATION FUND 625.00 313172 6/12/201, NICOLACE MARKETING INC 800.00 313173 6/12/201, SANDY ARACENA 120.00 313174 6/12/201. HEALTH ADVOCATE 1,103.85 313175 6/12/201• INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC 372.46 313176 6/12/201. FLORIDA COMBINED 14,681.92 313177 6/12/201• FLORIDA COMBINED 8,393.84 313178 6/12/201. PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 10,055.05 313179 6/12/201, DELRAY MOTORS 32.43 313180 6/12/201, JOSEPH CATALANO 100.00 313181 6/12/201, FCC ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 78.23 313182 6/12/201• RAYMOND J DUCHEMIN 60.00 313183 6/12/201. KEITH GROCHOLL 60.00 313184 6/12/201, ALAN JAY CHEVROLET CADILLAC 46,017.50 313185 6/12/201, BORRELLI & PARTNERS INC 27,619.23 313186 6/12/201, GFA INTERNATIONAL INC 915.00 313187 6/12/201• WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC 21,465.32 313188 6/12/201. NEWSOM OIL COMPANY 526.90 313189 6/12/201, HIGHMARK STOP LOSS 16,390.50 313190 6/12/201, ALAN JAY FORD LINCOLN MERCURY INC 93,161.00 3 CHECK NBR 313191 313192 313193 313194 313195 313196 313197 313198 313199 313200 313201 313202 313203 313204 313205 313206 313207 313208 313209 313210 313211 313212 313213 Grand Total: CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 6/12/201, ALTERATIONS BLESSED 60.00 6/12/201, VINCENT BURKE 556.63 6/12/201. ALCURT VERO BEACH LLC 1,814.00 6/12/201• REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC 9.36 6/12/201• LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 1,847.48 6/12/201 LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC 1,804.80 6/12/201. CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC 2,198.97 6/12/201. EMILY K DIMATTEO 20.00 6/12/201. ALEX MIKLO 85.00 6/12/201, FELIX ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA 54,410.07 6/12/201• W&G MAINTENANCE 880.00 6/12/201• SCADA SOLUTIONS LLC 5,300.00 6/12/201• C E R SIGNATURE CLEANING 5,000.00 6/12/201. MARGIE SMITH 144.00 6/12/201. NEEL-SCHAFFER INC 29,589.19 6/12/201, SAMBA HOLDINGS INC 94.22 6/12/201. WADE WILSON 60.00 6/12/201 RDW QUALITY BUILDERS LLC 10,575.00 6/12/201• RICHARD BEECHER 60.00 6/12/201. BARRY S BALMUTH PA 1,130.00 6/12/201, SCOTT CARSON 117.60 6/12/201, FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY ATTORNEYS 25.00 6/12/201. JANE NELSON 9,983.32 713,469.11 4 TRANS. NBR 1004263 1004264 1004265 1004266 1004267 1004268 1004269 1004270 1004271 1004272 1004273 1004274 1004275 1004276 1004277 1004278 1004279 1004280 1004281 1004282 1004283 1004284 1004285 1004286 1004287 1004288 1004289 1004290 1004291 1004292 1004293 1004294 1004295 1004296 1004297 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD DATE 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201• 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201- 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, 6/11/201, VENDOR REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA AT&T OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC WASTE MANAGEMENT INC ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST LLC COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC INDIAN RIVER BATTERY INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO GALLS LLC ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP HOMELAND IRRIGATION CENGAGE LEARNING CORPORATION FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS FLORIDA LEVEL & TRANSIT CO INC CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS SEA COAST A/C & SHEET METAL INC WACO FILTERS CORPORATION SIMS CRANE & EQUIPMENT CO CUMMINS POWER SOUTH LLC S & S AUTO PARTS STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA AMOUNT 69.94 164.93 83.62 1,328.71 3,494.44 818.60 248.88 31.71 1,356.30 377.65 421.49 189.00 154.00 46.64 315.00 266.00 227.00 703.35 14,921.66 260.13 21.69 4,752.14 343.59 556.25 424.18 1,896.00 9,601.50 1,790.80 734.76 594.24 570.00 28.00 230.76 46.63 149.23 47,218.82 1 TRANS NBR 3024 3025 3026 3027 3028 3029 3030 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 3037 3038 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH DATE 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/6/2014 6/9/2014 6/11/201, VENDOR FL SDU NACO/SOUTHEAST ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC IRC FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC NACO/SOUTHEAST ICMA RET CORP PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION R J SULLIVAN CORP SCHOOL DISTRICT OF I R COUNTY JMC SERVICES INC CLOSE CONSTRUCTION LLC IRS -PAYROLL TAXES IRS -PAYROLL TAXES AMOUNT 7,355.45 320.98 10,574.49 4,629.83 6,180.00 20,659.34 2,060.00 49,911.50 259,944.05 39,055.28 13,426.38 45,605.88 685,095.83 373,613.78 16,251.70 1,534,684.49 1 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: June 19, 2014 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS June 13, 2014 to June 19, 2014 SB In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of June 13, 2014 to June 19, 2014. Attachment: DB: MS 26 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 313214 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 40.98 313215 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 73.11 313216 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 349.10 313217 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 268.38 313218 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 24.49 313219 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 35.30 313220 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 90.16 313221 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 33.43 313222 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 71.76 313223 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 100.50 313224 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 29.92 313225 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 50.00 313226 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 276.22 313227 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 25.48 313228 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 81.64 313229 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 30.56 313230 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 26.44 313231 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 609.50 313232 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 40.96 313233 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 59.00 313234 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 35.97 313235 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 44.53 313236 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 358.79 313237 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 41.70 313238 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 13.26 313239 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 37.27 313240 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 45.29 313241 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 25.55 313242 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 69.18 313243 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 11.01 313244 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 189.48 313245 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 27.79 313246 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 294.85 313247 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6.32 313248 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 93.67 313249 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 30.40 313250 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 63.81 313251 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 23.11 313252 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 4.81 313253 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 28.24 313254 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 24.65 313255 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 86.22 313256 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 19.48 313257 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 7.10 313258 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 35.88 313259 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 1.36 313260 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 71.37 313261 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 5.77 313262 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 78.32 313263 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 23.82 313264 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 24.86 313265 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 37.23 313266 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 26.75 313267 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 94.36 313268 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 34.17 313269 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 74.38 313270 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 34.10 313271 6/16/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 6.25 1 CHECK NBR 313272 313273 313274 313275 313276 313277 313278 313279 313280 313281 313282 313283 313284 313285 313286 313287 313288 313289 313290 313291 313292 313293 313294 313295 313296 313297 313298 313299 313300 313301 313302 313303 313304 313305 313306 313307 313308 313309 313310 313311 313312 313313 313314 313315 313316 313317 313318 313319 313320 313321 313322 313323 313324 313325 313326 313327 313328 313329 313330 313331 CK DATE 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 VENDOR UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS UTIL REFUNDS PORT CONSOLIDATED INC COLE PARMER INSTRUMENT CO DON REID FORD JORDAN MOWER INC ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC RUSSELL CONCRETE INC AT&T WIRELESS AT&T WIRELESS DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC PARALEE COMPANY INC COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE DELTA SUPPLY CO E -Z BREW COFFEE & BOTTLE WATER SVC GRAINGER SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC MY RECEPTIONIST INC ACTION TRANSMISSION & A/C SERVICE DAILY COURIER SERVICE GAYLORD BROTHERS INC ACTION DIESEL PHYSIO CONTROL INC MASTELLER MOLER REED & TAYLOR INC SLP INVESTMENTS INC RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICE HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC PETES CONCRETE EGP INC VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC SIGNAL GROUP INC TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC PARAGON ELECTRIC INC MORNING STAR PERSONILIZED APPAREL INC CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF IRC INC XEROX CORP SUPPLIES GENERAL PART INC SIGNS INA DAY BAKER & TAYLOR INC GROVE WELDERS INC AMOUNT 14.90 117.85 16.74 36.70 80.69 230.56 47.49 8.53 51.58 79.11 21.17 133.63 71.99 40.11 45.35 69.80 62.95 44.80 86,284.35 969.52 31,340.00 167.93 760.63 12,912.54 374.68 590.55 918.00 1,485.25 1,404.82 1,084.90 400.00 241.00 201.68 11.48 34.26 282.15 273.93 997.58 1,422.00 205.62 75.00 102.66 4,447.12 78.00 220.00 2,001.49 1,668.69 1,800.00 210.00 327.46 1,900.00 118.35 1,623.10 96.00 19,788.88 233.46 761.51 240.00 1,320.59 91.04 2 CHECK NBR 313332 313333 313334 313335 313336 313337 313338 313339 313340 313341 313342 313343 313344 313345 313346 313347 313348 313349 313350 313351 313352 313353 313354 313355 313356 313357 313358 313359 313360 313361 313362 313363 313364 313365 313366 313367 313368 313369 313370 313371 313372 313373 313374 313375 313376 313377 313378 313379 313380 313381 313382 313383 313384 313385 313386 313387 313388 313389 313390 313391 CK DATE 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 VENDOR MIDWEST TAPE LLC BASS CARLTON SOD INC HOMETOWN PET CARE CENTER INC PA MICROMARKETING LLC K & M ELECTRIC SUPPLY BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO LLC RELIABLE POLY JOHN SUNSHINE SAFETY COUNCIL INC PAUL CARONE PAUL JULIN PST SERVICES INC CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT CITY OF VERO BEACH ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF B/C B/S OF FL ADM FEE JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC RIVERSIDE ASSEMBLY OF GOD SHERATON ORLANDO NORTH HOTEL AQUAGENIX DUMONT COMPANY INC IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FEDERAL EXPRESS HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE LTD FLORIDA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION MANPOWER PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY SPRINT SPECTRUM LP CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY SUBSTANCE AWARENESS COUNCIL OF IRC INC FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC INC FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT ACUSHNET COMPANY PUBLIC DEFENDER THOMAS S LOWTHER FUNERAL HOME CORP BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD of FLORIDA TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC STATE ATTORNEY PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC COOP INC US KIDS GOLF LLC GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FL INC LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES & CREMATORY JOSEPH A BAIRD SHERILEE D PARSELL GERALD A YOUNG SR TRANSPORTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS MIZUNO USA INC ALAN C KAUFFMANN THE FLORIDA BAR THE FLORIDA BAR THE FLORIDA BAR CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FL AMOUNT 455.15 62.00 236.25 29.99 129.95 680.40 90.49 175.00 1,541.00 623.00 38,956.08 1,608.56 3,285.10 2,794.00 84,604.16 142.32 478.38 834.94 573.94 34,830.00 9,690.30 171.70 150.00 139.00 635.00 3,645.00 15,201.24 60.88 1,480.66 190.00 606.00 96.32 62.59 1,335.62 14,112.98 160.00 64,064.24 163.41 3,593.60 425.00 1,469.40 257.29 655.19 394.00 39.80 674.26 76,684.40 1,132.74 272.35 850.00 700.88 869.50 30.00 9,430.00 494.03 105.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 2,250.00 3 CHECK NBR 313392 313393 313394 313395 313396 313397 313398 313399 313400 313401 313402 313403 313404 313405 313406 313407 313408 313409 313410 313411 313412 313413 313414 313415 313416 313417 313418 313419 313420 313421 313422 313423 313424 313425 313426 313427 313428 313429 313430 313431 313432 313433 313434 313435 313436 313437 313438 313439 313440 313441 313442 313443 313444 313445 313446 313447 313448 313449 313450 313451 CK DATE VENDOR 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 ADVANCED XEROGRAPHICS IMAGING AIRGAS CARBONIC INC TIM GEIB PINNACLE GROVE LTD C & C ELECTRIC WORKS INC CHRISTOPHER KAFER SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP EMPIRE DIRECT MARKETING JAMES WILLIAM OOLEY ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC MICHAEL QUIGLEY RUSSELL PAYNE INC WILLIAM SHANDOR CELICO PARTNERSHIP JEAN PETERS ARTHUR PRUETT RACHEL IVEY VAN WAL INC JOSEPH W VASQUEZ SNL INC SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER COPYTRONICS INC M -B COMPANIES INC MBV ENGINEERING INC CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC MASTELLER & MOLER INC AWERBACH & COHN PA STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL INC PELICAN ISLES LP ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT A.G. MAURO CO. OF FL GARY L EMBREY LARRY STEPHENS CAROLE J MADIGAN TREASURE COAST IMPORTS INC DANE PFARR DORIE SHEMO HFB OF FLORIDA LLC ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTY MGMT II INC SUPREME INTERNATIONAL LLC FLORIDA SUPERIOR SAND INC CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC KENNY CAMPBELL JR PAK MAIL HIBU INC JOHNNY B SMITH MCINTYRE, ELWELL & STRAMMER CHARLES A WALKER LARA SILVESTRE FULL GOSPEL ASSEMBLY INC OF VB DANIEL IOFFREDO BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC VIRGINIA PINES MICHELLE VAN KEULEN STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING AMOUNT 1,397.33 3,132.32 100.00 407.00 6,315.00 5.00 3,114.00 398.00 40.00 33,750.00 60.00 279.09 260.00 737.31 260.00 410.00 11.00 913.00 25.00 224.70 541.80 14,400.00 386.09 73.19 4,248.96 375.00 419.26 3,900.00 2,059.00 737.50 500.00 209.47 212.31 118.47 2,100.00 40.00 40.00 1,408.00 200.00 40.00 100.00 613.00 3,216.74 1,325.45 2,306.65 573.40 40.00 190.90 251.00 85.00 3,502.00 40.00 50.00 75.00 40.00 434.25 438.00 125.00 727.00 1,535.00 4 CHECK NBR 313452 313453 313454 313455 313456 313457 313458 313459 313460 313461 313462 313463 313464 313465 313466 313467 313468 313469 313470 313471 313472 313473 313474 313475 313476 313477 313478 313479 313480 313481 313482 313483 313484 313485 313486 313487 313488 313489 313490 313491 313492 313493 313494 313495 313496 313497 313498 313499 313500 313501 313502 313503 313504 313505 313506 313507 313508 313509 313510 313511 CK DATE 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014 VENDOR TRITEL INC EXPRESS SUPPLY INC ROBERT L MILLER VERO BEACH WINNELSON COMPANY INC NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROF SURVEYORS SANDY ARACENA ALMM LLC DAILY DOSE CAFE YAMAHA GOLF CAR COMPANY HEALTH ADVOCATE WITTENBACH BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC KEMPER BUSINESS SYSTEMS JUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIAN RIVER INC YOUR AQUA INSTRUCTOR LLC MURPHY & WALKER P L SAFETY SCHELL CORPORATION DELRAY MOTORS JOSEPH CATALANO FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC RAYMOND J DUCHEMIN DANIEL CORY MARTIN VIDACARE CORPORATION XYLEM WATER SOLUTION USA INC KEITH GROCHOLL ORLANDO FREIGHTLINER INC CITRIX ONLINE LLC COURTNEY GORMLEY CHIEFLAND DEVELOPMENT INC YP LLC THOMAS LOUGHLIN CONST CLEAN-UP INC HIGHMARK STOP LOSS MTD4 PELED LLC ALAN JAY FORD LINCOLN MERCURY INC REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC LOWES HOME CENTERS INC LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC EMILY K DIMATTEO GRAY ROBINSON PA ALEX MIKLO AGN SPORTS LLC BURNETT LIME CO INC IMPECCABLE SIGNS INC ERIN BASKINS LEARNING ALLIANCE 0 SPORTSWEAR LLC TREASURE COAST TURF INC STRAIGHT OAK LLC SEAN MAKI COMMUNICATIONS LLC CALDWELL PACETTI EDWARDS BALLARD PARTNERS INC MICHAEL YOUNG MARK BAER KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN QUICKSERIES PUBLISHING INC RYAN HERCO PRODUCTS CORP COURSE TRENDS INC CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION AMOUNT 49.50 5,000.00 50.00 1,236.66 35.00 60.00 575.00 852.00 242.68 320.10 137.21 436.50 6.91 1,667.00 150.00 10,168.96 385.18 170.37 60.00 2,833.33 40.00 655.00 2,209.69 297,384.00 40.00 525.04 2,028.00 180.00 7,495.00 137.80 2,000.00 4,753.00 423.00 66,026.50 9.36 1,365.59 6,948.48 5,647.66 120.00 250.00 65.00 150.00 6,472.20 84.00 19.22 312.15 929.50 550.00 419.40 561.00 1,957.50 6,250.00 40.00 3,712.00 138.40 138.40 1,928.20 85,672.64 300.00 2,599.54 5 CHECK NBR 313512 313513 313514 313515 313516 313517 313518 313519 313520 313521 313522 313523 313524 313525 313526 313527 313528 313529 313530 313531 313532 313533 313534 313535 313536 313537 313538 313539 313540 313541 313542 313543 313544 313545 313546 313547 313548 313549 313550 313551 313552 313553 313554 313555 313556 313557 313558 313559 313560 313561 313562 313563 313564 313565 313566 Grand Total: CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 6/19/2014 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION 2,505.17 6/19/2014 SOLUTIONZ VIDEO CONFERENCING INC 1,873.00 6/19/2014 WADE WILSON 65.00 6/19/2014 DUININCK INC 647,550.00 6/19/2014 BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOW 280.00 6/19/2014 BRUCE SABOL 70.00 6/19/2014 REFLECTION POOL SERVICE INC 3,545.10 6/19/2014 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY 9.66 6/19/2014 COAST TO COAST COMPUTER PRODUCTS 1,705.91 6/19/2014 BREVARD COUNTY BOCC 2,180.46 6/19/2014 MARGIE SMITH 184.00 6/19/2014 EXTREME GOLF INC 467.95 6/19/2014 RICHARD BEECHER 60.00 6/19/2014 VALERIE WATERS 200.00 6/19/2014 JEFF PASSARETTI 40.00 6/19/2014 DARLENE SILVERSTEIN 45.00 6/19/2014 STEVONDRA WELLS 50.00 6/19/2014 JACKIE PARKER 50.00 6/19/2014 CONNIE J MUZZY 50.00 6/19/2014 EUGENIA PARKER 50.00 6/19/2014 CHESTNUT PLAZA 2,152.50 6/19/2014 FSITE TREASURER 210.00 6/19/2014 PAIGE LESTER 48.95 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 41.23 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 54.27 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 63.28 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 41.61 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 62.05 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 40.22 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 25.06 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 58.29 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 70.60 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 65.69 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 1.22 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 62.32 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 85.30 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 36.43 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 23.74 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 19.34 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 57.56 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 67.69 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 38.30 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 52.76 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 1.21 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 31.71 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 42.05 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 30.57 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 10.54 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 33.54 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 26.28 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 75.16 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 74.44 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 81.65 6/19/2014 UTIL REFUNDS 59.40 6/19/2014 ROBERT & JOANNE AYCOCK 48.10 1,869,775.46 6 TRANS. NBR 1004298 1004299 1004300 1004301 1004302 1004303 1004304 1004305 1004306 1004307 1004308 1004309 1004310 1004311 1004312 1004313 1004314 1004315 1004316 1004317 1004318 1004319 1004320 1004321 1004322 1004323 1004324 1004325 1004326 1004327 1004328 1004329 1004330 1004331 1004332 1004333 1004334 1004335 1004336 1004337 1004338 1004339 1004340 1004341 1004342 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD DATE 6/13/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/16/2014 6/17/2014 6/17/2014 6/17/2014 6/17/2014 6/17/2014 6/17/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 6/18/2014 VENDOR ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC AT&T OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC WASTE MANAGEMENT INC BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC ADRON FENCE COMPANY INC CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL DAVES SPORTING GOODS & TROPHIES ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP CENGAGE LEARNING CORPORATION COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP COMMERCIAL ENERGY SPECIALISTS RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY CUMMINS POWER SOUTH LLC PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST LLC RECORDED BOOKS LLC SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE PRIDE ENTERPRISES RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC INDIAN RIVER BATTERY MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC DAVES SPORTING GOODS & TROPHIES MEEKS PLUMBING INC ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC HOMELAND IRRIGATION JOHNSON CONTROLS INC SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE CENGAGE LEARNING CORPORATION COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO FLAGLER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LLC CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS AUTO PARTNERS LLC L&L DISTRIBUTORS S & S AUTO PARTS EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER HYDRA SERVICE (S) INC AMOUNT 1,483.00 113.07 381.88 1,550.53 608.59 2,454.28 106.68 255.31 132.00 377.45 7,903.08 2,874.07 265.20 311.38 423.77 330.89 30,052.98 14,498.00 309.98 289.60 261.96 243.64 1,169.40 2,995.63 752.56 221.91 461.00 180.00 1,782.95 150.00 1,120.50 174.06 7,009.00 122.52 56.02 1,132.20 1,906.68 1,689.34 307.97 894.92 65.78 91.01 60.47 28.00 3,13 6.00 90,735.26 1 TRANS NBR 3039 3040 3041 3042 3043 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH DATE 6/12/2014 6/13/2014 6/13/2014 6/13/2014 6/13/2014 VENDOR I R C HEALTH INSURANCE - TRUST FLORIDA ORGANIC AQUACULTURE LLC KIMLEY HORN & ASSOC INC CDM SMITH INC VETERANS COUNCIL OF I R C AMOUNT 450,321.60 9,333.34 34,940.00 7,692.50 5,720.72 508,008.16 1 CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO: DATE: June 24, 2014 FROM: Jason E. Brown Members of the Board of County Commissioners Director, Office of Manage ent & Budget SUBJECT: 2014/2015 FINAL BUDGE H ' ARING CHANGE IN DATE On February 11, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners approved the dates for the 2014/2015 budget workshops and also the tentative and final budget hearing dates. The final hearing date was set for Wednesday, September 17, 2014 at 5:01 p.m. Due to conflicts, staff is proposing to change the date for the final hearing to Tuesday, September 16, 2014 at 5:01 p.m. There will be no conflict with the Indian River County School District, which has set their date for their final budget hearing on Tuesday, September 9, 2014. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the change in date for the final 2014/2015 budget hearing from Wednesday, September 17, 2014 to Tuesday, September 16, 2014 at 5:01 p.m. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: r f BY: (� nZ-A-A-P, Joseph A. Baird County Administrator FOR: July 1, 2014 Indian River County A ved Datte Administrator 1 1 Legal its bbb� Budget td l Department Risk Management 35 Consent Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES gD Date: To: From: Prepared By: Subject: June 17, 2014 Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Cindy Corrente, Utilities Finance Manag Adoption of a Red Flag Policy for Identity Theft Prevention DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On October 21, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Red Flag Policy for the detection, prevention and mitigation of identity theft in connection with utility accounts. Staff has followed this policy since its inception. Prior to May 2011, staff required various documents including applications and leases, from customers before opening their utility accounts. Copies of these documents were made and kept in a secured file room. Over time, documents were purged and had to be shredded in order to assure protection of our customer's identifying information. With the implementation of new billing software in May 2011, came the ability to store and secure this information electronically. Safeguards are built into the system so only a few authorized personnel have access to the identifying data. ANALYSIS: Staff recently reviewed the policy and made several suggestions to enhance the Department's ability to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft in connection with utility accounts. Staff also incorporated the ability to gather and store data electronically when developing the new policy. Staff worked with the County Attorney's office to develop the enhanced policy. FUNDING: There is no cost to the department to implement this policy. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the BCC approve and adopt the attached Red Flag Policy. ATTACHMENT(s): Red Flag Policy APPROVED FOR AGENDA: i By: riJs.) It 1'' ( )rU1' 1)'�!Jose ih A. Baird, County Administrator ' / / For: (,) { '1 L%' ./ Date Indian River Co. Approved Date Administration 1 Legal t ) j i Budget V C 23 Utilities 11 3' (..l2v l Utilities -Finance C. tI 36 Red Flag Policy Indian River County Department of Utility Services Purpose The purpose of the Program is to establish an Identity Theft Prevention Program designed to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft in connection with the opening of a covered account or an existing covered account and to provide for continued administration of the Program in compliance with Part 681 of Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations implementing Sections 114 and 315 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) of 2003. Definitions Covered account means: 1. An account that the Department offers or maintains, primarily for personal, family or household purposes that involves or is designed to permit multiple payments or transactions. Covered accounts include Department accounts; and 2. Any other account that the Department offers or maintains for which there is a reasonably foreseeable risk to customers or to the safety and soundness of the creditor from identity theft, including financial, operational, compliance, reputation or litigation risks. Credit means the right granted by the Department to a debtor to defer payment of debt or to incur debts and defer its payment or to purchase property or services and defer payment therefor. Department is defined as Indian River County Department of Utility Services Identifying information is any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific person, including: name, address, telephone number, Social Security number, date of birth, government issued driver's license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number, unique electronic identification number, computer's Internet Protocol (IP) address, or routing code. 37 Identity theft means fraud committed using the identifying information of another person without authority. Red Flag means a pattern, practice or specific activity that indicates the possible existence of identity theft. The Program The Department establishes an Identity Theft Prevention Program (Program) to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft. The Program shall include reasonable policies and procedures to: 1. Identify relevant Red Flags for covered accounts it offers or maintains and incorporate those Red Flags into the program; 2. Detect Red Flags that have been incorporated into the Program; 3. Respond appropriately to any Red Flags that are detected to prevent and mitigate identity theft; and 4. Ensure that the Program is updated periodically to reflect changes in risks to customers and to the safety and soundness of the Department from identity theft. The Program shall, as appropriate, incorporate existing policies and procedures that control reasonably foreseeable risks. Identification of Relevant Red Flags In order to identify relevant Red Flags, the Department considers the types of accounts that it offers and maintains, the methods it provides to open its accounts, the methods it provides to access its accounts and its previous experience with identify theft. The Department identifies the following Red Flags, in each of the listed categories: 1. Notifications and Warnings from Credit Reporting Agencies • Report of fraud accompanying a credit report; • Notice or report from a credit agency of a credit freeze on a customer or applicant; • Notice or report from a credit agency of an active duty alert for an applicant; and • Indication from a credit report of activity that is inconsistent with a customer's usual pattern or activity. 2. Suspicious Documents • Identification document or card that appears to be forged, altered or inauthentic; 2 38 • Identification document or card on which a person's photograph or physical description is not consistent with the person presenting the NIIIIW document; • Other document with information that is not consistent with existing customer information (such as if a person's signature on a check appears forged); and • Application for service that appears to have been altered or forged. 3. Suspicious Personal Identifying Information Identifying information presented that is inconsistent with other information the customer provides (example: inconsistent birth dates); Identifying information presented that is inconsistent with other sources of information (for instance, an address not matching an address on the credit report or a previous address listed in the Department's records); • Identifying information presented that is the same as information shown on other applications that were found to be fraudulent; • Identifying information presented that is consistent with fraudulent activity (such as an invalid phone number or fictitious billing address); • Social Security number presented that is the same as one given by another customer; • An address or phone number presented that is the same as that of another person; • A person fails to provide complete personal identifying information on an application when reminded to do so (however, by law social security numbers must not be required); and • A person's identifying information is not consistent with the information that is on file for the customer. 4. Suspicious Account Activity or Unusual Use of Account • Change of address for an account followed by a request to change the account holder's name; • Payments stop on an otherwise consistently up-to-date account; • Account used in a way that is not consistent with prior use (example: very high activity); • Mail sent to the account holder is repeatedly returned as undeliverable; • Notice to the Department that a customer is not receiving mail sent by the Department; • Notice to the Department that an account has unauthorized activity: • Breach in the Department's computer system security; or • Unauthorized access to or use of customer account information. 5. Alerts from Others 3 39 • Notice to the Department from a customer, identity theft victim, law enforcement or other person that it has opened or is maintaining a fraudulent account for a person engaged in identity theft. Detection of Red Flags A. New Accounts In order to detect any of the Department's Red Flags identified above associated with the opening of a new account, the Department's personnel will take the following steps to obtain and verify the identity of the person opening the account: • Require certain identifying information such as name, date of birth, residential or business address, principal place of business for an entity, driver's license or other identification; • Verify the customer's identity (for instance, review a driver's license or other picture identification card); • Review documentation showing the existence of a business entity; and • Independently contact the customer. B. Existing Accounts In order to detect any of the Red Flags identified above for an existing account, the Department's personnel will take the following steps to monitor transactions with an account: Verify the identification of customers if they request information, whether in person, via telephone, via facsimile or via e-mail; Verify the validity of requests to change billing addresses; and Verify changes in banking information given for billing and payment purposes. Response to suspected identity theft In the event that the Department's staff detect any identified Red Flags, such staff shall take one or more of the following steps, depending on the degree of risk posed by the Red Flag: • Continue to monitor an account for evidence of identity theft; • Contact the customer: • Change any passwords or other security devices that permit access to accounts; • Not open a new account; • Close an existing account; • Reopen an account with a new number; 4 40 • Notify the Program Administrator for determination of the appropriate step(s) to take; • Notify law enforcement; or • Determine that no response is warranted under the particular circumstances. In order to further prevent the likelihood of identity theft occurring with respect to Department accounts, the Department's staff will take the following steps with respect to its internal operating procedures to protect customer identifying information: • Coordinate with the County's Computer Support Services department to ensure that its computer virus protection is up to date, website is secure or provide clear notice that the website is not secure; • Ensure that the office computers are password protected ; • Keep offices clear of papers containing customer information; • Request only the last 4 digits of social security numbers (if any); • Require and keep only the kinds of customer information that are necessary for Department purposes. Updating the Program The Program shall be updated periodically to reflect changes in risks to customers or to the safety and soundness of the Department from identity theft based on factors such as: The experiences of the Department with identity theft; • Changes in methods of identity theft; • Changes in methods to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft; • Changes in the types of accounts that the Department offers or maintains; • Changes in the business arrangements of the Department, including acquisitions and service provider arrangements. Administration of Program • The Department shall be responsible for the development, implementation, oversight and continued administration of the Program. • The Department shall train staff, as necessary, to effectively implement the Program; and • At least once annually, staff shall sign a written statement attesting that they have read and understand the Policy; • The Department shall exercise appropriate and effective oversight of service provider arrangements. Oversight of the Program 1. Oversight of the Program shall include: 5 41 • Assignment of specific responsibility for implementation of the Program to the Department's Finance Manager; • Review of reports prepared by staff regarding compliance; and • Approval of material changes to the Program as necessary to address changing risks of identity theft. 2. Reports shall be prepared as follows: The Department's Customer Service Staff is responsible for development, implementation and administration of the Program. They shall report to the Department Finance Manager at least annually on compliance by the Department with the Program. The report shall address material matters related to the Program and evaluate issues such as: • The effectiveness of the policies and procedures in addressing the risk of identity theft in connection with the opening of covered accounts and with respect to existing covered accounts; Service provider agreements; Significant incidents involving identity theft and management's response; and • Recommendations for material changes to the Program. Oversight of Service Provider Arrangements In the event the Department engages a service provider to perform an activity in connection with one or more accounts, it will take the following steps to ensure the service provider performs its activity in accordance with reasonable policies and procedures designed to detect, prevent, and mitigate the risk of identity theft: • Require, by contract, that service providers have such policies and procedures in place; and • Require, by contract, that service providers review the Department's Program and report any Red Flags to the Program Administrator. Duties Regarding Address Discrepancies The Department shall develop policies and procedures designed to enable the Department to form a reasonable belief that a credit report relates to the consumer for whom it was requested if the Department receives a notice of address discrepancy from a nationwide consumer reporting agency indicating the address given by the consumer differs from the address contained in the consumer report. The Department may reasonably confirm that an address is accurate by any of the following means: • Verification of the address with the consumer; 6 42 • Review of the Department's records; • Verification of the address through third -party sources; or • Other reasonable means. If an accurate address is confirmed, the Department shall furnish the consumer's address to the nationwide consumer reporting agency from which it received the notice of address discrepancy if: • The Department establishes a continuing relationship with the consumer; and • The Department, regularly and in the ordinary course of business, furnishes information to the consumer reporting agency. 7 43 ��liK-.- S: ti 11. I), ���!•e! I Annual Written Statement Regarding the Red Flag Policy Indian River County Department of Utility Services I , attest that I have read and understand (Print Name of Employee) The Red Flag Policy for the Indian River County Department of Utility Services. I also attest that I will adhere to this policy when conducting business on behalf of the Department. Signature Date 44 Consent Agenda Item INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SE Date: June 17, 2014 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: Work Order No. 12 with CDM Smith — Design, Permitting and Bidding Services for Construction of Well No. 7 and at the South County RO Plant DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: On August 18, 2009 the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved CDM Smith to design, permit, bid and manage construction of a potable water production well (Well No. 7) which included all pertinent pumps, electrical work and instrumentation components to serve the South County RO Plant (SCRO). The proposed well is to be located at the northwest corner of the South County Park, adjacent to the ball fields. The construction plans and the technical specifications were completed before the County placed the project on hold. Since that time, the South County Park multi-purpose fields were built necessitating the need to modify the original design. Some of the wells at the SCRO have been in service for some time and are experiencing diminishing yield output. Having an additional well will reduce the stress on the existing wells. Well No. 7 has previously been approved in the existing St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) for groundwater withdrawals supplying the SCRO. However, a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit will be required before construction of the well can begin. ANALYSIS: Previously, impact fee funds were used for the design services in anticipation of future growth demands in the southern portion of the county which never came to fruition. When the project was put on hold, the expenses incurred at that time were transferred to the operating fund. In an abundance of caution, the funding source now reflects the use of operating funds for the remaining engineering work and construction costs since well No.7 is being added for increased reliability and redundancy to the system, not for additional capacity. The scope of services associated with Work Order No.12 is to finalize design, complete the bid package and obtain the necessary permits for proposed well No.7 at the SCRO as per the CDM Smith proposal dated June 6, 2014. Consultant will begin work immediately upon authorization of this Work Order and complete design, bid package and permitting within 120 -days. 45 FUNDING: Funding for Work Order No. 12 is available in the SCRO Well No. 7 Account within the Utilities Operating Fund. Operating funds are derived from water and sewer sales. ACCOUNT INFORMATION: Description Account No. Amount SCRO Well No.7 471-169000-14506 $39,910.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Work Order No. 12 with CDM Smith, approve design fees in the lump sum amount of $39,910.00, and authorize the Chairman to execute the same, as presented. ATTACHMENT: Work Order No. 12 — Scope of Services from CDM Smith for Final Design, Permitting, Bidding Services of Well No. 7 at South County R.O. Plant APPROVED FOR AGENDA: ) J -13, - Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Foi': 1, cOlY Date Indian River Co. Approved Date Administration 4 ( .V7 Legal � Budget 41', pi I4' Utilities y / �l Utilities Finance ON_ (Q— 1 i F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\WATER\WTP - South RO\Well No. 7 Construction\Agenda CDM-6-17-14.doc 46 cSmith 1701 Highway A 1 A Suite 301 Vero Beach, Florida 32963 tel: 772-231-4301 fax: 772-231-4998 June 6, 2014 Mr. Vincent Burke, P.E. Director of Utility Services Indian River County 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Subject: Continuing Consulting Services Work Order No. 12 Final Design, Permitting and Bidding Services for Proposed Well No. 7 Dear Mr. Burke: In August 2009, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Work Order under which CDM Smith �.► Inc. (formerly CDM Inc.) designed the proposed seventh production well and corresponding transmission pipeline at the South County Water Treatment Plant (WTP). Upon completion of the 100 percent design documents (minus the County's front-end bid documents), the County opted to place the project on hold. At this time, staff wishes to enlist CDM Smith's services to update the previously prepared plans and specifications, finalize the bid package and obtain any necessary permits for the construction of the new well. Transmitted herewith are three copies of Work Order No. 12 (Exhibits A and B) to provide the updated plans and specifications, permitting services and bidding for the proposed Well No. 7 at the South County WTP. Please feel free to contact our office if you require any additional information. Sincerely, tt,>�ta Q�- Jill T. Grimaldi, BCFS Principal Scientist CDM Smith Inc. JTG/EJG/jj Attachments (3) File: 0000-EJGMK-MG.IRC cc: Arjuna Weragoda Approved by: Eric y..Grotke, P.E., BCEE Vice President CDM Smith Inc. 490 doc 47 WORK ORDER NUMBER 12 This Work Order Number 12 is entered into as of this day of , 2014 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of December 6, 2011 ("Agreement"), by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and CDM Smith Inc., formerly Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit A (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT CDM Smith Inc. c Er J. otke, P.E., BCEE Vice President BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court By: Deputy Clerk Approved: J ph A. Bird, County Administrator proved as to form and le a sufficiency: —Dylan Reingold, County Attorney 1 II1490.doc 48 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT FINAL DESIGN, PERMITTING AND BIDDING SERVICES FOR PROPOSED WELL NO. 7 This Authorization, when executed, shall be incorporated in and become part of the Contract for Consulting/Professional Services between the Indian River County (County), and CDM Smith Inc. (Consultant), dated December 6, 2011 hereafter referred to as the Contract. BACKGROUND The County owns and operates the South County Water Treatment Plant (WTP) which currently operates with six existing Upper Floridan Aquifer (UFA) production wells. The existing Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) for the South County WTP also includes a future permitted seventh well that has not yet been constructed. In August 2009, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Work Order for the Consultant to design, permit and provide services during construction of the proposed well and raw water pipeline. After reaching the 100 percent design level (minus the County's front-end documents), staff decided to put the project on hold and not construct the well. The County now wishes to finalize design, complete the bid package and finalize permitting of the proposed well at the South County WTP. During the 2009 effort, coordination with the Parks Department, County environmental personnel, and the fish and wildlife service (FWS) took place, resulting in the utility department mitigating for scrub jay impacts already incurred by the park development. Additional coordination was undertaken with FWS to determine whether or not a connection to the Well No. 4 transmission piping (in lieu of connecting to Well No. 6) was feasible. This effort is outlined in Task No. 1. No additional mitigation activities will be required for the scrub jay area. The following is the scope of services to be provided under this authorization. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant will perform the following task services: Task 1.0 COORDINATION WITH FWS In preparation for the effort of updating the project documents from 2009 to current, it was discovered that improvements within the South County park since 2009 have resulted in several obstacles being constructed between the proposed Well No. 7 location and the connection point to the Well No. 6 transmission piping. One alternative that will be considered is revisiting the potential to use a horizontal directional drill (HDD) under the scrub jay conservation area with connection to the Well No. 4 transmission piping to the east. In 2009, FWS indicated that such an activity may be detrimental to the Scrub Jays due to noise and vibration impacts; however, CDM Smith will reach out to FWS to confirm their stance on this issue. CDM Smith will participate in up to 2 meetings to determine if these activities will be detrimental to the Scrub Jays. This task provides for coordination with FWS. TASK 2.0 MEETING WITH SJRWMD The proposed Well No. 7 is included in the County's existing CUP. While no increase in allocation is proposed (operational flexibility only), coordination with St. Johns River Water Management (SJRWMD) A-1 jj1490.doc 49 is still required to give staff the opportunity to review and approve the final location, elevation and design of the proposed well prior to commencing construction. During the 2009 design process, a well location was selected within the South County Park that fell within the designated stormwater detention area for the park. Consultant coordinated with the local drainage district and SJRWMD staff via phone to select the location. Since the well is proposed to be constructed into the UFA, SJRWMD indicated that the proximity to the stormwater area would not be problematic so long as the finished elevation of the wellhead was above that of the permitted stormwater elevation. The field verification by SJRWMD staff, however, was not conducted before the project was placed on hold. Consultant will coordinate, prepare for and participate in the field verification meeting with SJRWMD. TASK 3.0 PREPARATION OF FINAL BID PACKAGE The County's original intent was to bid the well construction, pump assembly and wellhead/appurtenances as one bid package, with all below -ground transmission piping connecting Well No. 7 to the Well No. 6 raw water main to be bid in a separate package. It is now the County's intention to bid the entire project as a single package. Consultant will combine the bid packages to eliminate redundancy and prepare a single'set of plans and specifications suitable for obtaining bids. Consultant will update the design documents, as needed, to reflect current building code and modify the recommended suppliers if necessary. Consultant will also prepare County front-end documents to accompany the bid package. Consultant anticipates receipt of a current version of generic front end documents from County staff, previously approved by the County attorney, to customize for this bid package. Subtask 3.1 Final Contract Documents Consultant will update the design documents to merge the previous documents into 1 bid package, to reflect current building code current vendor information, re-route the transmission piping around the new lift station and piping, and reconfigure the connection point to the Well No. 6 transmission main so as to minimize impacts to the newly constructed lacrosse fields. Subtask 3.2 Final Contract Document Submittal Consultant will submit three hardcopy sets of final contract documents to County staff prior to advertisement of the bid for the Project. Consultant will also provide digital files of plans and technical specifications in PDF format to the County for use in publishing the bid on DemandStar. The County will advertise for bids and provide necessary documentation to potential bidders. Consultant will not provide additional hardcopies of bid documents to prospective bidders unless negotiated for reimbursement from the County prior to doing so. Subtask 3.3 Preparation of Probable Construction Cost Consultant will prepare an opinion of the probable construction cost based on the final bid package prior to advertising the bid. The final estimate of probable construction cost shall be delivered to County staff prior to the opening of bids for the Project. TASK 4.0 WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMITTING Consultant has confirmed with SJRWMD that no additional permitting is required from this agency in order to construct Well No. 7 (plans and specifications will still require review as outlined in Task 1). In order to construct the new Well No. 7, the County must file for a construction permit with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Consultant will prepare and submit the "Specific Permit to Construct Potable Water System Components" (FDEP Form 62-555.900(1)) prior to bidding the A-2 jj1490.doc 50 project. Issuance of the permit by FDEP will allow the County to construct the well and conduct performance testing. Upon completion of the well construction and demonstration of performance testing by the Contractor, the County is required to submit the "Certification of Construction Completion and Request for Clearance to Place Permitted PWS Components into Operation" (FDEP Form 62-555.900(9)). Approval of this form by FDEP will allow the County to place the new well into service. Since the Consultant will not be overseeing construction of the well, preparation of this certification is not included in the Scope of Services. This must be certified by the consultant that oversees construction. In addition to the FDEP permits described above, SJRWMD requires the applicant to complete the "State of Florida Permit Application to Construct, Repair, Modify or Abandon a Well" form (SJRWMD Form 40B- 3-1) and a subsequent well completion form. Completion and submittal of these two forms will be the responsibility of the successful bidder. Preparation of the SJRWMD forms is not included in this Scope of Services. Consultant has confirmed with the County planning department that no site plan approval (administrative or otherwise) will be required for this project. Planning has, however, requested a PDF of the final site plan sheet of the bid documents for their records. TASK 5.0 BIDDING SERVICES Consultant will respond to up to 5 requests for information and/or clarifications from potential bidders between the advertisement and the bid opening. TASK 6.0 PROJECT AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT Activities performed under this task consist of those general functions required to maintain the project on schedule, within budget, and that the quality of the work products defined within this scope is consistent with Consultant's standards and the County's expectations. Specific activities included are identified below: Subtask 6.1 Project Quality Management Consultant maintains a Quality Management System (QMS) on all projects. In accordance with the QMS Quality Procedures, a project planning and scope review meeting will be conducted at the start of the project. In addition, the Consultant's Technical Specialists will perform quality reviews of the deliverables identified in Tasks 2 and 3, and Subtask 5.1. Subtask 6.2 Project Status Reports Consultant's project manager will prepare and submit monthly written status reports with each invoice for an anticipated project life of 6 months. OTHER SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SCOPE OF SERVICES This authorization does not include: • Modifications to the groundwater model prepared by Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan; • Preparation and submittal of the SJRWMD well construction and well completion forms (to be completed by Contractor); • Participation in pre-bid meeting or bid opening; • Evaluation of bids or award proceedings; • Certification of Construction Completion and Request for Clearance to Place Permitted PWS Components into Operation (FDEP Permit form); A-3 jj1490.doc 51 • Design services associated with wellhead enclosures (not included per discussions with County staff); or • Services during construction. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES The County will provide all reasonable data requested by the Consultant for the purpose of completing the aforementioned tasks. The County will also provide a timely review of all work products and all permit fees. Front-end documents to be used in the bid package will be provided by the County and shall be the most current version approved by the County Attorney's office. SCHEDULE Consultant will begin work immediately upon authorization of this Work Order. The following schedule is projected for this project: Bid Package - Completed within 45 days of Notice to Proceed Permitting - Estimated complete within 45 days of application Bidding — Approximately 60 days upon advertisement COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT Compensation for the Scope of Services described herein shall be made on the basis of a lump sum fee. The lump sum fee for Tasks 1.0 through 6.0, inclusive, is $39,910 as shown in Exhibit B. Consultant will invoice County on a monthly basis based on percent complete. A-4 jj1490.doc 52 EXHIBIT B FEE SCHEDULE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH COUNTY WATER TREATMENT PLANT FINAL DESIGN, PERMITTING AND BIDDING SERVICES FOR PROPOSED WELL NO. 7 For invoicing purposes, a summary of fees by task is provided below. The Consultant will invoice the County monthly on a Lump Sum basis for costs incurred during the billing cycle. Task 1.0 - Coordination with FWS $ 2,880 Task 2.0 - Meeting with SJRWMD $ 920 Task 3.0 - Prep of Final Bid Package $ 23,350 Task 4.0 - Well Construction Permitting $ 1,970 Task 5.0 - Bidding Services $ 2,000 Task 6.0 - Project Management and Quality Control $ 7,290 Subtotal $ 38,410 Other Direct Costs $ 1,500 TOTAL (Lump Sum) $ 39,910 B-1 jj1490.doc 53 CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA F MEMORANDUM Assistant County Administrator / Department of General Services To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator From: Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator Date: June 16, 2014 Subject: Renewal of Concessionaire License Agreement with Treasure Coast Concessions DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: On July 11, 2012, following the issuance of a request for qualifications, the County entered into a Concessionaire Agreement with Treasure Coast Concessions to provide concession services at the North County Aquatic Center. In order to evaluate the transition to an outside concessionaire along with the performance of Treasure Coast during an initial trial period, County Staff preferred not to include an automatic renewal provision in the Agreement. In April of 2013, the Agreement was amended to allow the County to sell some concessions directly, or when Treasure Coast was not on site. In July of 2013, the County issued another Request For Proposals ("RFP") for additional food concession services at the beach parks and the Shooting Range, however; no other responses were received and Treasure Coast continued to operate at various County venues at times and locations advantageous to the company and the County. The parties now seek to renew the Concessionaire Agreement with Treasure Coast as Amended under similar terms and conditions, however; since the original Agreement does not provide for an automatic renewal, Staff also seeks the formality of requesting board approval to continue the partnership directly in lieu of issuing another RFP. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: During the initial term and trial period of the Agreement, Staff has been pleased with the quality and presentation of a variety of concession products offered to the public visiting the North County Aquatic Center and other County venues. Treasure Coast recently received a letter of commendation from the Governor's Office for maintaining the highest quality health standards. The ability to provide a hot menu with a variety of compliments ensures a higher level of service to the public. Under the terms of the Agreement, the County receives 20% of the daily gross receipts with no overhead. The County also maintains the right to sell slushies' which have been a customer favorite over the years. Additionally, the County reserves flexibility to operate concessions in house or assign concessions to an outside vendor during special events, camps, and whenever the concessionaire is not on premises. The Agreement has a duration of 2 years with two one-year renewal options. FUNDING: No funding is required under this Agreement. F:\Assistant County Administrator\AGENDA ITEMS\2014\BCC 07 JUL 2014\BCC Agenda Memo - Renewal of Concessionaire License Agmt.doc 54 Page Two June 16, 2014 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached Concessionaire Agreement with authorization for the Chairman to sign and waiver of other required formalities, if any, with respect to advertising for additional proposals for the duration of the Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Concessionaire Agreement Letter from Governor Rick Scott Results of RFP dated August 6, 2013 Approved Agenda Item r` / FOR:,, /, ,-:i//)/ �` Jul/I, 2014 1 Joseph A. Baird County Administrator Indian River Co. Approved Date Administration ."' (72G /i County Attorney `� r . ,�:')) ' 1 Budget I C f)q Department 0y /y Risk Management F:\Assistant County Administrator\AGENDA ITEMS\2014\BCC 07 JUL 2014\BCC Agenda Memo - Renewal of Concessionaire License Agmt.doc 55 CONCESSIONAIRE LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 2014, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA through its Parks Division, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County") and TREASURE COAST CONSULTING INC. d/b/a TREASURE COAST CONCESSIONS ("Concessionaire"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County is the owner of certain real property located in Indian River County, Florida, commonly known as the North County Aquatic Center, the Indian River County Public Shooting Range, and Golden Sands Park and such other real property that may be designated in the County's sole discretion (collectively, the "Parks"); and WHEREAS, the Concessionaire desires to utilize certain facilities located at the Parks for purposes hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, operation of said concession will mutually benefit the parties hereto and the residents of Indian River County, Florida; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants herein contained, it is mutually agreed between the parties as follows: 1. Term. The Concessionaire is hereby granted a license to operate a food concession consisting of a mobile cart and a tent set up adjacent to the cart ("Concession") to be located at the Parks from the date of execution of this Agreement and shall continue for two years (the "Initial Term"). The Concessionaire may request two additional renewals of the Agreement, each for an additional year ("Renewal Term") by submitting written notice to the County at least ninety (90) days prior to the commencement of a Renewal Term. The County may grant a Renewal Term in ..... its sole discretion. The parties may agree to alter time periods and locations at which food service 1 56 will be provided at one or more of the Parks during those times of year when park attendance is low or minimal. The County shall make the ultimate determination in its sole discretion as to whether Concessionaire is permitted to provide concession services on any County owned property. 2. Payments. Concessionaire shall pay to the County, twenty percent (20%) of the cumulative gross receipts for the Term of this Agreement in monthly installments (the "License Fee"). The License Fee shall be due at the close of business by the 10th each applicable month (the "Due Date"). For the purpose of computing the License Fee, cumulative gross receipts shall exclude local, state and federal sales tax. License Fee payments will be made by business check and will be mailed or given directly to the Indian River County Recreation Department, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960-0310, on the Due Date. An accurate accounting of the gross receipts from each day for each of the Parks shall be recorded in substantially the same form as shown in Exhibit "A" and such form shall accompany the License Fee. 3. Accounting Procedure. Concessionaire shall maintain complete and accurate financial and performance records for concession services performed in connection with this Agreement in accordance with good and accepted accounting procedures, which records shall be available for inspection upon request by the County or any duly authorized representative thereof. Concessionaire hereby agrees to maintain financial records and to adopt accounting procedures requested by the County. Concessionaire shall cooperate with and provide to the County or its duly authorized representative any additional information or reports concerning its activities, income, revenues, expenses, and disbursements when so requested. All transactions, activities and records of the Concessionaire shall be subject to audit at any time by the auditors of the County with the cost to be paid by the Concessionaire should such an audit reveal that the Concessionaire is in violation of this Agreement. Such books 2 57 and records shall be maintained by the Concessionaire for a period of three (3) years from the date of termination of this Agreement unless a shorter period is otherwise authorized in writing. 4. Use of Premises. Concessionaire shall operate the Concession, which Concession shall be limited solely to the sale of menu items approved by the Indian River County Parks and Recreation Director, or his designee. No other goods or services shall be offered or sold by the Concessionaire without the prior written approval of the Indian River County Parks and Recreation Director, or his designee. County reserves the exclusive right to operate "Slushy Machine" out of the Concession stand at the North County Aquatic Center and retain all profits. County also reserves the exclusive right to sell non-perishable items out of the Concession stand at any time when the North County Aquatic Center pool is open but the concessionaire is not on site. It is specifically agreed and understood that the use herein set forth shall be the only use allowable under the Agreement and that any variance in such use shall require the written consent of the County. The location of the Concession at each of the Parks shall be determined by the County in its sole discretion. The Concession may not operate after the general hours of operation of the Parks unless the County provides otherwise. Periodically, the North County Aquatic Center closes for swim meets, private functions and those County sponsored events not open to the general public, and Concessionaire agrees that Concession will not be open during those times, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. 5. Duties of Concessionaire. Concessionaire agrees as follows: a. To maintain an inventory sufficient to satisfy the demands and needs of the public. 3 58 b. To secure and maintain all licenses and permits required and to pay when due all taxes and assessments which shall be imposed or assessed by governmental units in connection with the business or operation conducted pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement and to otherwise comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, or policies established by the County or local, state and federal governmental unit or authority. c. To provide service to the public in accordance with an operating schedule approved by the Indian River County Parks and Recreation Director, or his designee, for the period of the Initial Term or Renewal Term, as applicable, of this Agreement. Said schedule shall not be modified or altered without written approval of the Indian River County Parks and Recreations Director, or his designee. The cost of purchasing the food items shall be posted and in full view of the public. d. To maintain equipment in good working condition and appearance of equipment must meet standards that will not conflict with the overall decorum of the Parks. e. To establish rules regarding customer service if and when required, subject to approval of the Indian River County Parks and Recreation Director, or his designee. f. To maintain good public relations, to conduct said Concession in a manner which is courteous and fair to the public and to be responsive to customer's requests and complaints. g. To cooperate fully with County officials in all matters relating to the Concession and the recreation complex of which they are a part. Concession. h. To purchase and install any equipment required for operation of the i. To notify the County immediately in writing of any potentially hazardous condition existing on or about the Concession or the Parks. 4 59 6. Duties of the County. The County agrees as follows: a. To make available to Concessionaire water and electricity connections for operation of the Concession. b. To provide adequate collection and disposal of garbage by a dumpster located on site. c. To provide access to the Parks during normal operating hours to the best of its ability, subject to the right of the County or any other governmental authority to temporarily restrict or deny access to said facility for the purpose of constructing, installing, operating or maintaining any public facility, including, but not limited to, public works and public utilities, or for the purpose of performing any other governmental function. The Indian River County Parks and Recreation Director, or his designee, shall administer the County's interest in said Concession. d. To make its best efforts, while Concessionaire is operating the Concession, to prohibit the general public from bringing soft side bags and coolers, except for those individuals who have health reasons to the North County Aquatic Center, the Indian River County Public Shooting Range or for those individuals who are participating in a County scheduled athletic event or competition. 7. Improvements. Concessionaire agrees that improvements made by him/her shall be at his/her expense and shall have the prior written approval of the Indian River County Parks and Recreation Director, or his designee, and all regulatory agencies where applicable. 8. Indemnification and Insurance. Concessionaire shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County and its commissioners, officers, employees and agents, from any and all losses, damages, expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees) and other liabilities of any type whatsoever, arising out of or relating to any negligence, intentional tort, breach of contract, or 5 60 breach of applicable law by the Concessionaire, or its employees, agents, subcontractors, or other persons or entities performing work under this Agreement. The Concessionaire agrees to provide and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement, without cost or expense to the County, policies of insurance generally known as comprehensive general liability policies insuring the Concessionaire against any and all claims, demands, or clauses of action whatsoever for the injuries received and damage to property incurred in connection with the use, occupation and management or control of the property and any improvements thereon by Concessionaire. Such policies of insurance shall insure the Concessionaire in the amount not less than $1,000,000.00 to cover any and all liability claims arising in connection with any particular accident or occurrence. Such liability policies shall provide that the County is an additional insured. The County shall be notified in writing of any reduction, cancellation or substantial change of policy or policies at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such action. The Concessionaire shall provide the described insurance on policies and with insurers acceptable to the County and licensed and authorized under the laws of the State of Florida. These insurance requirements shall not relieve or limit the liability of the Concessionaire. The County does not in any way represent that these types or amounts of insurance are sufficient or adequate to protect the Concessionaire's interest or liabilities, but are merely minimums. A certificate of insurance indicating that the Concessionaire has coverage in accordance with the requirements of the Agreement shall be furnished by the Concessionaire to the Indian River County Parks and Recreation, prior to commencement of operations in the Parks. All personal property housed or placed at the Parks shall be at the risk of Concessionaire, and the County shall have no liability for any damage or loss to any personal property located thereon for any cause whatsoever. The Concessionaire agrees and understands 6 61 that the County does not and shall not carry liability, fire, or theft insurance on the operation of these facilities to cover the Concessionaire's interest therein. 9. Covenants Against Assignment and Subletting. The Concessionaire shall not assign any portion of the Agreement nor allow same to be assigned by operation of law without the express written approval of the County. 10. Independent Contractor. The Concessionaire shall perform the conditions of this Agreement as an independent contractor and nothing herein shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. Nothing in the Agreement shall be in any way construed to constitute the Concessionaire or any of his agents or employees as the agent, employee, or representative of the County. 11. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the County in its sole discretion and shall be effective immediately upon written notice to Concessionaire. Upon termination of this Agreement, the Concessionaire shall immediately remove any personal property. Any property not removed within five (5) days after termination shall become the property of the County. 12. Additional Locations. Upon written agreement by the parties, this Agreement may include additional concession locations at various other county parks. The terms of this Agreement shall form the basis of any future written document, notwithstanding that a different term, location, and hours of operation would apply. 13. Notice. Notice under this Agreement shall be given to the County by mailing written notice to the Indian River County Recreation Department, Attention: Mike Redstone, 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. Notice shall be given to the Concessionaire by mailing written notice, to Thomas "Tom" Burger, 2585 Little Eagle Lane, Vero Beach, Florida 32962. 7 62 14. Attorney's Fees. In the event of any legal action to enforce the terms of this Agreement each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. 15. Unauthorized Alien Workers. Indian River County will not intentionally award publicly -funded contracts to any contractor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provisions in 8 U.S.C. Section 1324a(e) (Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)). The County shall consider the employment by the contractor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A(e) of the INA. Such violation of the employment provisions contained in Section 274A(e) of the INA shall be ground for unilateral cancellation of the Agreement by the County. 16. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed and entered into in the State of Florida and this Agreement, and any dispute arising hereunder, shall be governed, interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of Florida. 17. Venue. Venue for any legal action brought by any party to this Agreement to interpret, construe or enforce this Agreement shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in and for Indian River County, Florida, and any trial shall be non -jury. 18. Public Entity Crimes. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with a public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of Category Two for a period of thirty-six (36) month from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. Concessionaire represents and warrants that no fact or circumstance exists which constitutes a violation of the above prohibitions. 8 63 19. Modification. No modification of this Agreement shall be binding on the County or the Concessionaire unless reduced to writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the County and the Concessionaire. 20. Emergencies. In the case of a declared emergency in Indian River County by the Board of County Commissioners, the County retains the right to immediately resume occupation, management, and maintenance of the facility, to use the facility to meet any emergency needs of the citizens of Indian River County for the period of that emergency and a reasonable period of time thereafter as deemed necessary by the County. 21. Public Record. All records, books, and accounts related to the performance of this agreement shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the Florida Public Records Act, Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. 22. Force Majeure. Neither the County nor the Concessionaire shall be considered in breach of this Agreement to the extent that performance of their respective obligations (excluding payment obligations) is prevented by an Event of Force Majeure that arises after the effective date of this Agreement. An "Event of Force Majeure" shall include, but not be limited to an act of God (such as, but not limited to, fires, explosions, earthquakes, drought, tidal waves and floods); war, hostilities (whether declared or not), invasion, act of foreign enemies, mobilization, requisition, or embargo; rebellions, revolution, insurrection, or military or usurped power, or civil war; contamination by radioactivity from any nuclear fuel, or from any nuclear waste from the combustion of nuclear fuel, radioactive toxic explosive, or other hazardous properties of any explosive nuclear assembly or nuclear component of such assembly; riot, commotion, strikes, go slows, lock outs or disorder, unless solely restricted to employees of any supplier or of its subcontractors; or acts or threats of terrorism. 9 64 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals on the day and year first above written. Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ("County") By: By: Deputy Clerk Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman APPROVED by BCC: , 2014. Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ' ( seph A. Baird, County Administrator 1 ylan Reingold, County Attorney TREASURE COAST CONSULTING INC., d/b/a TREASURE COAST CONCESSIONS ("Concessionaire") By: Thomas J. Burger, P Dated this day of June, 2014. 10 2 65 66 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM REQUEST FOR REVIEW DATE: August 6, 2013 TO: Mike Zito, General Services FROM: Maeghan McLaughlin Purchasing Division SUBJECT: RFP No.: 2013050 Project: RFP for Food Concession Services at IRC Beach Parks and Shooting Range Please find enclosed the RFP Tabulation for this project. There were no bids received. If you require any additional information or clarification regarding this RFP, please do not hesitate to give me a call at 226-1416. Attachments 2013050 RFP Tabulation C.\Users\svotzi\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files \Content Outlook\CRTU9XLW\2013050 Review Memo RFP.doc 67 et 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Witness: Jennifer Hyde (772) 226-1416 RFP TABULATION SHEET to aas c ^O o� a)4 L 0 O P,0 u M ct 1-4 0 Ca fsr 00 3 Copies et bA z. O sl r Disclosure Location � uuc. 4.UU lJlu Company NONE RECEIVED 68 2013050 RFP package REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Notice is hereby given that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners is requesting proposals from qualified vendors to provide the following: Indian River County Bid # 2013050 Food Concession Services at Indian River County Beach Parks and Shooting Range Detailed specifications for the above referenced RFP are available from the Indian River County Purchasing Division at (772) 226-1416 or Email: purchasing@ircgov.com. Submit one original and three (3) copies of submittal. All submittals, mailed or walked in, will be received by the Purchasing Division, 1800 27th Street, Building B, Vero Beach, Horida 32960 on or before 2:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 6, 2013. Submittals received after 2:00 PM, of the day specified above, will not be considered. The Board of County Commissioners reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals in whole or in part and to waive any technicality or irregularity. PURCHASING MANAGER INDIAN RIVER COUNTY For Publication in the Indian River Press Journal on: July 22, 2013 Please furnish Tear Sheet, Affidavit of Publication, and Invoice to: Indian River County Purchasing Division 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Page 1 of 18 69 Mr. Thomas Burger Treasure Coast Concessions 2585 Little Eagle Lane Southwest Vero Beach, Florida 32962 Dear Mr. Burger: RICK SCOTT GOVERNOR December 13, 2013 I would like to congratulate the Treasure Coast Concessions located at 7500 14th Lane for being one of only 17 food service establishments m the Sunshine State recognized during the most recent inspections conducted by the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation for having no safety or sanitation violations within the past year. I applaud you and your employees for demonstrating such a high level of attention to detail and commitment to excellence. The work you are doing in your community is helping keep our state moving in the right direction. Our pro -growth agenda is working to increase opportunities for Florida families to live their version of the American dream. Florida's unemployment rate remains below the national average for the eighth consecutive month, and our total job creation since December 2010 is now at 440,900. However, we have more work to do because we are working to create an opportunity economy where dynamic, growing industries create jobs and careers for generations to come. We will continue working tirelessly to make sure Florida families can get a great job and have access to a quality education so they can pursue their dreams. Again, I commend you for your hard work and wish you and your business the best success. y @ItsWorkingFL Sincerely, Rick Scott Governor THE CAPITOL www.FLGov.com TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399 • (850) 488-2272 70 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM ('0\.51:\ TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director AND Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine cw- i FROM: Michael D. Nixon, P.E., Roadway Production Manager,/%,J SUBJECT: Resolution Formally Designating a portion of County Owned property along 8th Street and 27th Avenue as Right -Of -Way DATE: May 22, 2014 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In the course of County staff preparing sidewalk plans on the north side of 8th Street which is to be constructed within the next three years through a Florida Department of Transportation grant, it became apparent that a portion of County owned property located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and 27th Avenue had insufficient right-of-way to construct the sidewalk. In order to proceed with the sidewalk project and allow for future road expansion, staff thought it appropriate to designate the right-of-way by formal document. The attached resolution has been prepared for this purpose. After the dedication of the right-of-way, the remaining lot will be 40 feet wide and 80 feet deep, which will create an unbuildable lot. FUNDING The only cost associate with this matter will be recording fees for recordation of the resolution in the amount of $35.50 Funding for this expenditure is budgeted and available from Secondary Roads, Gas Tax Account No. 10921441-066120, Right of Way. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution, and authorize the Chairman to execute same for recordation in the Public records of Indian River County, Florida. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Indian River County Approved Date Administration f I, G( / ��� Budget /& `� Iolt4- Legal e $ r- - q- ( a Public Works 6 -2S-/y Engineering .02_/r/ 1-02—/V F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\I049_8th St Sidewalk Improvements (58th Ave to 21st CouA)\Admim\agenda items\1049 8 St Swk (21 Ct-58 Ave) ROW acq.6-1O-14.doc 71 RESOLUTION NO. 2014- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FORMALLY DESIGNATING CERTAIN COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY FOR 8TH STREET AND 27TH AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND DIRECTING THE PROPERTY APPRAISER TO CUT OUT THE PROPERTY DESIGNATED AS RIGHT- OF-WAY FROM THE PARCEL OF PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS TAX PARCEL NO. 33-39-11-00006-0130-00003.0 IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, Indian River County is the owner of a parcel of property located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 8th Street and 27th Avenue by virtue of a warranty deed recorded on July 31, 1987 in O.R. Book 775, Page 241 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida, and further identified as tax parcel 33-39-11-00006-0130-00003.0; and WHEREAS, recently in the course of preparing sidewalk plans for 8th Street, it became apparent that a portion of the Parcel along 27th Avenue and 8th Street will be required to be used for right-of-way for the construction of the sidewalk and future roadway expansion; and WHEREAS, a sketch and legal description of the right-of-way have been prepared and are attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, would be beneficial to designate by recorded instrument the County's designation of this right-of-way so that the Indian River County Property Appraiser can earmark the property as right-of-way on the appropriate maps, as well as cut out the designated right-of-way from of the Parcel, thus alleviating any potential boundary issues that may surface in the future. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. That portion of the Parcel running along 27th Avenue and 8th Street, as described and depicted on the attached Exhibit "A" is hereby formally designated as right-of-way; and 2. This resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; and 3. Upon the recordation of this resolution, the Indian River County Property Appraiser is instructed to cut out the designated right-of-way as depicted and described on the attached Exhibit "A" from the parcel and accordingly earmark any maps within the Property Appraiser's Office to reflect this designation. P'\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJEC IS11049 8th St Sidewalk Improvements (58th Ave to 21s1 Court)AAdmimAagenda itemsV1049 Resolution ROW 6-10-14 doc 72 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 - The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: this Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice -Chairman Wesley 5. Davis Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted day of , 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Appr•ved as to f.rm an Ieg�l s�f'�iciency: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney I VPublic Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION 1'ROJEC1 SV1049 Rth St SideNalk Improvements (58th Ave to 21st Com* Admim\agenda items \I049 Resolution ROW 6-10.14_doc 73 0 0 z craZ-o 5'3D z CD 3 e0 m 'v DC O H2O 05.2 3 0 N m f 0 0 x D z C) m w (0 m N m C) 0 z ONI2133NION3 l lNf100 2:13A18 NVIONI 803 O321Vd32id N O z THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY—SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION c D z 0 D Ti m z m 0 Z N m r m 0 2 D c) m NOIIVOIJI12h30 W N = Z= z2 (n C) V1 0 (n u).-ux> EmM-18M 0 X1() m() 2 II cn -1 OZoQOo2Dm>mom0 0 -.0 M0 m1D �rrnnD1mxmo2 p -1220-A v0 WS -1mw -0m2m -i_ �o ��,ZD_�X-i�,m�N ril 00 0Z 0z0Or�n-<p, '- Df r-1'00Xrrm-z0-1m Z rn1- � �N 0 0 O m--1 Om �0 mz O 2m N ND Mm M i5 z v - 2 0 o� mw zo mo r <� mm A) 2 -> -4 Acizy D c7 oz D r -� OCD mm m rm Zm oto r (n m N cD 0 r �l z D� m m 0> m' <� m m D z X 2 2 �, 0 m z - m m 0 z (n -o 0 0001rTImrrnm r me Orzm-1--1 '1 -imm r (n22m Z m3m Omm Dr.-(nmo-1u^2ZmzDxi m-1 z Z Z O m z-l-to 0 K and 0O0o-1Dalo2 r21mmz o _ -� O m 0 = l 0 00 0 (/) -r1 U) V) r - -i o --i p D0 ?O Z DZ Z z o �=im m m r71 X mOrn m 0m (n m o m • 0 O -o m 4 O 0 Z 0 0 z 0 0 -n w z 0 1111111,11 0 2 0 Z 44-1 TS OF THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS ESTABLISHED NAL RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR 10 FEET AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 492, NZ O D z 'd012l0�3 'AINl00 2l3AI2! -u O O z 0) RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 67, PAGE 314 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER =Z'zcn�1=Y10 momm 2n oz0=mmpmn Sod cco om 0=mC)>m2vm TI x2(n-I(pD0 IM--I-110o2 Dz--9 m Or- O0 zm>m9m0-51D Oy�CXO-1 r m < - Z r'1 m —4 �Z i o0j?�*I -100= f71 O-1 rn M -co A> X=U' D 1-m�_(,im D-Iz(+ O -I � D MO p 0 mTI mm 0 M (O�1r=P*1-IC)) mm 4- <0mn0( 0m(7l,1Q 4 TI Z .r - I ,' -` 00 -(�Dv2 m 0mgxDz� c o -< <" o 00 m m-1 O (� = co m m O m -1 O 1'' r71rD-SIOD Izc ' 0 ZO �0 --1 z0 D*23f2r1 RECORD BOOK 750, PAGE 241 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, AVM-30—lHO121 :NOIld12jOS34 1VO31 AVD OR. FILL I:\r1a1C 01001011 FlD,RCr7\IOWJM S• 1100110J( ogoomb1or10 (56711 AK 70 ZIP 051m iltRY0OK-1M St ow 5 U1 lo( n sow shevaO\Io*-ed A_rmi he I50 . oocase dorm) 5-11/4 74 0 0 z m z +XI o rn -o 0C n X00 N n Z 0 fA v w 0 m D z 0 m w co m --1 0 z N w N Cn m -_I 0 z Is) Xi - 5 O rri "r10 Z 1 = > \ < m 03 D 1n n73 X - VI -i � O m O Z Z N TN` 9 0 X 1-0-0-0 *7Dbb 11 > a P o 73 2 11 II D 0C -0-O iNoom O -ice �l O 0 I m Orn Mz mz z mo m = m ( - z 0 D 0D 0 c z 0 T1 Cn c U) 0 -1 0 )NVdWOJJV 1 0 0 0 O m z 0) 0 _-1 Ian aro riL h\NKr eMealneslallwc MOON /11oKCrs\ross_ef11 sr snss os se*osonrrs (sem I►[ to 21sT OOUI1f)\IUIK+\1o1F-eM sr Muhl 11.111/14 W !m+ *AVM\lor-m srsm+ wie MAL oncac norm 0-23-14 NVIONI 2103 O32iVd3ild AiNl00 83AI8 ONI833NION3 031V380 SV Z ONV I. S133HS H108 Il0HIIM O11VA ION m 1 N U1 0 N00' 18'06"E a) (J1 3„LC,c1'.69S 01 C/) 00 zc O IC Z CAMW (0 0 R/W LINE N CJ1 27TH AVENUE (EMERSON AVENUE) N0cY08'45"E EAST LINE ISEECT ION 10-33 T39 0 -. 0, y U I N n 1 01 _ O 64.86' J �'' m 40' 24.82'/ a) 0 NI /1,/i' EXISTING R W LINE 90' D\ I r z 30' 3„9S,9Z.69S 40' O.R.B. 775, PG 241 (J1 0 6-2C- l l c_ (avod z m 44' O.R.B. 776, PG 2825 130' i�-3' AERIAL EASEMENT I (0.R.8 776, PG 2829) JOE & SANDRA LARGENT 33-39-11-00006-0130-00004.0 O.R.B. 724, PG. 1634 75 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM CONSENT 8H TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director ONeNe"--- Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engineei Michael D. Nixon, P.E., Roadway Production M .,' a er,t/ FROM: Etienne B. Bourgeois, P.E., Project Engineer SUBJECT: 66th Avenue and CR 510 Intersection Improvements — Amendment No. 6 IRC Project No. 0546 DATE: June 24, 2014 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In 1995, the widening of 66th Avenue, from 2 -lanes to a 4 -lane divided roadway, was added to the Indian River County Long Range Transportation Plan. In 2005, a design contract was awarded to Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc., and was amended in 2006 to include the segment of 66th Avenue between north of 57th Street and the City of Sebastian City limits, and CR 510 between west of 75" Court and 61st Drive. In March 2007, Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. completed 60% design drawings and their contract was amended to include a corridor study. The corridor study limits included 66th Avenue from north of 57th Avenue to the Sebastian city limits and evaluated the intersection of Barber Street and Schumann Drive in Sebastian. In April 2012, the Board of County Commissioners approved a revised corridor study that excluded improvements within the Sebastian city limits, following the Sebastian City Council's decision not to proceed with improvements to the intersection of Barber Street and Schumann Drive. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) recently informed County MPO staff that County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP) funding has become available in the amount of $2,111,966 for the construction of this project. Staff believes that by dividing the project limits into phases, the construction plans, specifications, and right-of-way acquisition can be completed in accordance with FDOT's required timeframe. Amendment No. 6 adjusts the project limits, project description, and the scope of services for Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. to prepare construction documents for phased construction. Amendment No. 6 removes the design of improvements from the Barber Street and Schumann Drive intersection from the scope of work and adds the work necessary to create a new construction plan set for the expansion of the 66th Avenue and CR 510 intersection (Phase 1). The limits of the Phase 1 improvements include approximately 2,500 feet of widening/ transitions on the north, south, and west approaches, and approximately 2,850 feet of widening/ transitions on the east approach. Phase 1 will also include the Traffic Signal design for the 66' Avenue and CR 510 intersection. Amendment No. 6 also includes the work required to modify the current construction plans to show the Phase 1 improvements as existing features and designing the tie-ins (Phase 2). 76 Page Two 66th Avenue and CR 510 Intersection Improvements — Amendment No. 6 Etienne B. Bourgeois, P.E. For July 1, 2014 BCC Meeting FUNDING Funding is available in Optional Sales Tax/66th Avenue/CR510 Intersection Account No. 31521441-066510- 06004. No additional funding is required for this Amendment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve Amendment No. 6 to the Professional Engineering/ Land Surveying services Agreement between Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and Indian River County, Florida. ATTACHMENTS Amendment No. 6 to the Professional Engineering/ Land Surveying services Agreement between Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. and Indian River County, Florida DISTRIBUTION Brian Good, P.E., Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: Jul 1 2014 B 77 f:lpublic workslengineering division projects10546-66th north & cr510 central (kimley hom)ladmimlagenda items\bcc 66av amendment no. 6 07-01-2014.doc Approved Date Administration�T/ Budget Legal fp IA Public Works Engineering c i# e 1?, i f / 77 f:lpublic workslengineering division projects10546-66th north & cr510 central (kimley hom)ladmimlagenda items\bcc 66av amendment no. 6 07-01-2014.doc INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 66th Avenue/ County Road 510 Roadway Widening AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING/LAND SURVEYING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. This is an amendment to the existing Engineering/Land Surveying Services Agreement (AGREEMENT) dated February 22d, 2005 between Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (ENGINEER) and Indian River County (COUNTY). This amendment addresses changes in "Section I - Project Limits and Description", "Section III - Scope of Services", "Section V - Compensation" and "Section XVI — Duration of Agreement" of the AGREEMENT. Amendment Description This Amendment includes the following: "SECTION I — PROJECT LIMITS AND DESCRIPTION" is being modified to incorporate the following: Consultant services are required for the preparation of design surveys, roadway construction documents and review agency permits necessary to support widening the County Road 510/ 66th Avenue intersection. The COUNTY desires to develop a separate standalone set of construction documents to implement the expanded intersection consistent with the 66th Avenue Route Study. In addition, the existing County Road 510/ 66th Avenue corridor construction documents shall be revised to reflect intersection excerpt. Contract Amendment No. 3 included the development of the expanded intersection improvement to Schumann Drive/ Barber Street intersection. Based upon a public presentation to the City of Sebastian City Council and coordination with City staff in 2011, the City of Sebastian has elected to not support the widening of this intersection. As such, the COUNTY has elected to delete the remaining scope of work associated with expanding the Schumann Drive/ Barber Street intersection from the Consultant's scope of work. "SECTION III — SCOPE OF SERVICES" is being modified to incorporate the following: The ENGINEER shall develop expanded intersection construction documents associated with County Road 510/ 66th Avenue intersection which include no less than 1,000 linear feet of full corridor development along each approach outside of roadway transition 78 Indian River County, Amendment No. 6 66th Avenue/ County Road 510 Roadway Widening zones. The roadway transition zones are estimated to require 1,500 linear feet on each approach to provide for horizontal transitions and lanage development. The westbound approach shall extend the full corridor development east of 64th Avenue such that all westbound auxiliary lanes at the County Road 510/ 64th Avenue intersection can be developed outside of the required transition zone. D. Roadway Plans Roadway plans shall be prepared to include: plotting of survey data; establishment of profile grades; key map; plan and profile sheets (including geometric calculations); typical section sheets; summary of quantities; summary of drainage structures; cross-section sheets at 100' intervals (including earthwork computations); signing and pavement marking plans; and other detail sheets necessary to convey the intent of the scope of services outlined herein. All plans shall be prepared in the English units. Roadway set of plans shall consist of the following: Notes: P — Preliminary, C — Complete, but subject to change, F - Fina The Roadway plans will be submitted to the COUNTY for review at the 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% plan completion. E. Stormwater Design & Permitting 1. Perform drainage investigations and analysis necessary to prepare a design which will drain the project in accordance with the City of Sebastian, St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), Sebastian River Water Control District (SRWCD), Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and/or Indian River County design criteria. 2. The ENGINEER shall prepare stormwater permit applications for the SJRWMD, SRWCD, ACOE and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements for submittal by the COUNTY. This will consist of all required evaluation, design, coordination, and follow-up work necessary to support Page 2 of 6 79 30% 60% 90% 100% Cover Sheet P CC F Typical Sections P CC F Summary of Quantities & General Notes P P C F Summary of Drainage Structures Sheets P C F Plan and Profile Sheets P C C F Construction Details P C F Cross Sections at 100 ft interval P C F Signage & Pavement Marking Plans P C C F Signalization Plans P C F Intersection Plan & Details P C C F Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans SWPPP P C F Construction Cost Estimate and Quantities P C C F Notes: P — Preliminary, C — Complete, but subject to change, F - Fina The Roadway plans will be submitted to the COUNTY for review at the 30%, 60%, 90% and 100% plan completion. E. Stormwater Design & Permitting 1. Perform drainage investigations and analysis necessary to prepare a design which will drain the project in accordance with the City of Sebastian, St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), Sebastian River Water Control District (SRWCD), Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and/or Indian River County design criteria. 2. The ENGINEER shall prepare stormwater permit applications for the SJRWMD, SRWCD, ACOE and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements for submittal by the COUNTY. This will consist of all required evaluation, design, coordination, and follow-up work necessary to support Page 2 of 6 79 Indian River County, Amendment No. 6 66th Avenue/ County Road 510 Roadway Widening permit applications. The COUNTY will review the permit applications as necessary. The ENGINEER shall assemble and be responsible for the final submittal. 3. The ENGINEER shall prepare permit sketches for submission by the COUNTY to ACOE, and SJRWMD for dredge and fill activities, if necessary. The ENGINEER shall submit all permit sketches on 8" x 11" sheets. Sketches shall be neatly scaled, signed and sealed, and reproducible. 4. Environmental evaluations and/or biological summary reports necessary to discern impacts to other surface waters, wetlands and/or endangered species associated with contemplated alignments will be completed, if necessary. Should mitigation plans be required to address delineated impacts a separate agreement with the COUNTY will be provided as an additional service, or the applicable COUNTY Department may design modifications with Department Staff or other consultants. 5. Stormwater Design and Permitting will be performed and any cost savings, should the COUNTY enter into a development agreement with adjacent property owners that enables the COUNTY to utilize their lands for the purpose of stormwater attenuation and water quality treatment, shall be passed onto the COUNTY. 6. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be developed in conjunction with this project. The site specific SWPPP is a requirement of both the EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities, and the FDEP Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities. Note: SJRWMD administers permit for FDEP. G. Signalization Plans Signalization plans will be developed in conjunction with the roadway improvements at the County Road 510/ 66th Avenue intersection. Mast -arm signal configuration will be designed to meet current COUNTY and FDOT standards. Page 3 of 6 80 Indian River County, Amendment No. 6 66th Avenue/ County Road 510 Roadway Widening "SECTION V — COMPENSATION" is being modified to incorporate the following: The COUNTY agrees to pay and the ENGINEER agrees to accept for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement fees inclusive of expenses in accordance with the following: A. Professional Services Fee The basic compensation mutually agreed upon by the ENGINEER and the COUNTY is as follows: Task Labor Fee Schumann Drive/ Barber Street Intersection Lump Sum Components Remaining Deleted Task Budget ($128,712.50) Hourly -Not -To -Exceed Components Remaining Deleted Task Budget ($20,548.95) Countv Road 510/ 66`x' Avenue Intersection Lump Sum Components Roadway Plans $78,831.45 Signing & Marking Plans $8,170 Stormwater Design/ Environmental Assessment $19,630 Permitting $16,670 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan $7,240 Signalization Plans $6,770 Sub -Total $137,311.45 Hourly -Not -To -Exceed Components Stormwater Facility Topographic Survey $8,200 Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation $3,750 Sub -Total $11,950 Grand Total $0.00 Page 4 of 6 81 Indian River County, Amendment No. 6 66th Avenue/ County Road 510 Roadway Widening "SECTION XVI — DURATION OF AGREEMENT" is being modified to incorporate the following: The time for completion of the 90% design drawings and permit applications for the scope of services detailed in this amendment will be seven (7) months following receipt of the notice to proceed from the COUNTY. Once permits and 90% design comments are received from the COUNTY, 100% design drawings will be completed 30 days thereafter. THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Page 5 of 6 82 Indian River County, Amendment No. 6 66th Avenue/ County Road 510 Roadway Widening The AGREEMENT is hereby amended as specifically set forth here in. All other sections of the AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect and are incorporated herein. This Amendment No. 6 to the AGREEMENT regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed by the laws of the State of Florida. In witness whereof the parties have executed this Amendment this day of , 2014. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 445 24th VER A 32960 By: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Board of County Commissioners By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Attest if Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller _ Attest: Accepted` Jo. =.h A. B.'rd, County Administrator Approved . s o Form and Le ufficiency: Page 6 of 6 ylan Reingold, County Attorney 83 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine Historic Dodgertown (fka Vero Beach Sports Village) Room Renovations — Change Order No. 4 IRC Project No. 1341 DATE: June 24, 2014 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On October 22, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners awarded the bid to OAC Action Construction, Corp. for construction of the Historic Dodgertown Room Renovations. Three change orders have been approved to date for the renovation of a total of 66 rooms at Historic Dodgertown with a current contract total of $636,245.22 The attached Change Order No. 4 is to provide for adding new windows in 10 suites and electrical improvements to the 2 cabana rooms. These were unforeseen conditions found during pre - construction inspections and subsequently required by the Indian River County Building Division and Fire Prevention Division. The amount of Change Order No. 4 is $21,491.31, which brings the contract total to $657,736.53. FUNDING Funding for Change Order No. 4 is currently not budgeted. A budget amendment in the amount of $21,492.00 would be needed from Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 15tto provide funding for this change order to the Dodgertown Room Renovation Construction Account # 30816275-066510-01002. A copy of the Fifth Amendment to Facility Lease Agreement with Verotown, LLC is attached, which indicates in paragraph 7 "... and to reserve the right to increase and/or decrease its budget by a total $50,000 in the future for the referenced renovations using change orders approved by the Indian River Board of County Commissioners..." RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 to the contract with OAC Action Construction, Corp in the amount of $21,491.31 for a total contract price of $657,736.53. With this change order the total expenditures will be $690,245.22 including direct purchase items by the Purchasing Division. Staff further requests the Board authorize the necessary budget amendment to provide additional funding in the amount of $21,492.00 from Optional Sales Tax. 84 F. \Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS 1341 -Historic Dodgertown (flea VB Sports Village) Room Renovations)\Admin\agenda items\BCC Agenda Change Order No 4 07-01- 2014.doc Page 2 Christopher J. Kafer Jr., P.E., County Engineer For July 1, 2014 BCC Meeting ATTACHMENTS 1. Change Order No. 4 2. OAC Action Construction Corp. Change Order Proposal dated 6/12/2014 3. Fifth Amendment to Facility Lease Agreement with Verotown, LLC DISTRIBUTION 1. OAC Action Construction, Corp. 2. Craig Callan, Historic Dodgertown APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR July 1, 2014 Indian River County Appro • Date Administration ►• l�lj�' �� Budget 41' 2S ei Legal O fC t0 2s Public Works OS iy Engineering C%1cY G .27 "%,/ F.\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS \1341 -Historic Dodgertown (&a VB Sports Village) Room Renovations)\Admin\agenda items\BCC Agenda Change Order No 4 07-01- 2014.doc SECTION 00942 - Change Order Form No. 4 DATE OF ISSUANCE 07/01/2014 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/01/2014 OWNER: Indian River County CONTRACTOR OAC Action Construction, Corp. Project: HISTORIC DODGERTOWN ROOM RENOVATIONS Project No. 1341 Bid No. 2014003 You are directed to make the following changes in the Contract Documents: Description: Installation of windows in suites and changing out of electrical panel in cabanas. Reason for Change Order: Unforeseen Building and Fire Division requirements Attachments: OAC Action Construction Corp. Change Order Proposal dated 6/12/2014 CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: Description Amount Original Contract Price $599,345.00 Net increase (decrease) Change Order No.1.2&3: Net Increase from previous Change Order No. 1,2&3 $36,900.22 Contract Time prior to this Change Order: Final Completion: Contract Price prior to this Change Order: $636,245.22 (days or dates) 0 days Net increase of this Change Order: $ 21,491.31 Contract Price with all approved Change Orders: $657,736.53 ACCEPTED: By: CONTRACTOR (Signature) Date: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES Description Time Original Contract Time: Final Completion: (days or dates) 271 days Net increase (decrease) Change Order No.1.2&3: (Odays) 39 days Final Completion: Contract Time prior to this Change Order: Final Completion: (days or dates) 310 days Net increase Change Order 4: Final Completion: (days or dates) 0 days Contract Time with all approved Change Orders: Final Completion: (days or dates) 310 days N INE igri Date : 6/12/2014 From: Vendor: Contact : Address : City/Zip : CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL OAC Action Construction, Corp. Ozzie Cruz 12540 SW 130 St,#3 Miami,FI 33186 Re: Notice of Proposed Change Order # 3R To : Attention : Daniel Wittenberg Project No : 1341.00 Project Name : Historic Dodgertown Address : Vero Beach, FL Detailed description of Change Order Work to include but not limited to all labor, material, tools, and equipment required to: 1. Cost of removing existing windows 2. Cost of installing new 74" x 50" aluminum impact windows 3. Replace 225 amp Panel See attached detailed Contractor and Subcontractor breakdown. Detailed description of credits ❑ The total Applicable credits for all labor, material, tools, and equipments previously estimated is $ DNo applicable credits. See attached detailed "Credit Breakdown" form. Time Extension X❑ The above-described work will affect the Critical Path of the schedule requiring a time extension of 1 calendar days per set of rooms. Will not affect the Critical Path of the schedule. Total of Change Order Contractor Breakdown Subtotal Subcontractor Breakdown Credit Deduction(s) Subtotal after Credit Subcontractor Amount O&P Bonding Cost Additional Work Contractor Overhead Contractor Profit Total The total amount of deduct any applicable credits is $491.31 X See attached Detailed Contractor and Subcontractor breakdown. Thank you, Name $15,831.48 $2,723.92 $( $0.00 $136.20 $425.00 $1,187.36 $1,187.36 $21,49131 add change order including overhead and profit less 87 CONTRACTOR DETAILED BREAKDOWN Date : 6/12/2014 From: To : Vendor : OAC Action Construction, Corp. Attention : Daniel Wittenberg Contact : Ozzie Cruz Project No : 1341.00 Address : 12540 SW 130 St . # 3 Proiect Name : Historic Dodeertown City/Zip Miami,FI 33186 Address : Vero Beach, FL Re: Notice of Proposed Change Order # 3R SUB CONTRACTOR BREAKDOWN Description Qty Unit Units Cost Total Material Electrician 1.00 Ea 2723.92 $2,723.92 0.00 Ea 0.00 $0.00 LS $0.00 LS $0.00 LS $0.00 Is $0.00 TOTAL MATERIAL COST $2,723.92 LABOR BREAKDOWN Description Qty Unit Units Cost Labor Total Labor Burden Carpenter Stucco Patches 22.00 M/Hrs. 19.25 35% $571.73 Carpenter -(2 workers x 5 hours each) 100.00 M/Hrs. 19.25 35% $2,598.75 Supervision 80.00 M/Hrs. 25.00 35% $2.700.00 Clerical 0.00 M/Hrs. 35.00 35% $0.00 Project Management 8.00 M/Hrs. 45.00 35% $486.00 $6,356.48 CONTRACTOR Material & Equipment BREAKDOWN Description Qty Unit Units Cost Total Equipment 74" x 50" roller impact windows 10.00 Each 845.00 $8,450.00 Caulking, screws, bucks for windows. etc 10.00 Each 35.00 $350.00 Dumpster 1.00 Each 450.00 $450.00 Stucco Patch 10.00 Each 22.50 $225.00 0.00 Each 0.00 $0.00 $9,475.00 CONTRACTOR'S SUBTOTAL AMOUNT S18,555.40 88 Prepared by, record and return to: Office of the County Attorney 1801 27th St., Vero Beach, FL 32960 Telephone: 772.226.1424 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO FACILITY LEASE AGREEMENT THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is entered into as of this l stday ofApri 1 , 2014, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County") and Verotown, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company authorized to do business in the State of Florida ("Verotown"). WHEREAS, on or about May 1, 2009, the County and MiLB Vero Beach, LLC, a Florida Limited liability company ("MiLB"), entered into the Facility Lease Agreement in which the County leased the Facility to MiLB, and granted to MiLB certain management rights with respect to the Facility, for a term of five years ending April 1, 2014 ("Original Lease"); and WHEREAS, on or about June 1, 2011, the County and MiLB entered into the First Amendment to Facility Lease Agreement ("First Amendment"); and WHEREAS, on or about January 1, 2012, the County, MiLB and Verotown, entered into the Second Amendment to Facility Lease Agreement, in which, among other things, the rights and obligations of MiLB under the Original Lease and the First Amendment were assigned to Verotown ("Second Amendment"); and WHEREAS, on or about July 16, 2013, the County and Verotown ("the Parties") entered into the Third Amendment to Facility Lease Agreement, ("Third Amendment") in which, among other things, Verotown exercised its right to renew the lease for an additional five years, and the County agreed to pay for or reimburse Verotown for the actual costs of renovating 67 hotel rooms in an amount not to exceed $600,000; and WHEREAS, on or about March 10, 2014, the Parties entered into the Fourth Amendment to Facility Lease Agreement ("Fourth Amendment") in which, among other things, the Parties amended the number of hotel rooms thatneed-to be renovated from 67 to 66 and the County agreed to increase its budget for the referenced renovations from $600,000 to $634,000; and WHEREAS, the County wishes to amend Section 5 of the Fourth Amendment both to increase its budget for renovating the remaining 66 hotel rooms from $634,000 to $670,245.22, and to reserve the right to increase and/or decrease its budget by a total $50,000 in the future for the referenced renovations using change orders approved by the -Indian River Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the County and Verotown reaffirm their desire to preserve the rich traditions and history of "Dodgertown" and the Facility, and recognize that the benefits to the local community of continuing baseball, athletic, conference and other activities at the Facility are unique and diverse, and include, without limitation, increased economic activity and employment opportunities, increased tourist trade and promotional opportunities, increased Page 1 of 4 89 direct and indirect tax revenues, private sector payment of substantial maintenance and operation expenses which would otherwise burden local taxpayers, and other such benefits, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree, as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein. 2. Hotel Room Renovations. In Section 5 of the Fourth Amendment, the County agreed to provide up to $634,000 for renovating 66 of the remaining hotel rooms. Due to a number of unforeseen expenditures, the Parties agree that it is not feasible to conduct the referenced renovations for $634,000 or less. Therefore, Section 5 of the Fourth Amendment is hereby amended to state that the County shall pay $670,245.22 for all of the actual costs associated with renovating 66 of the remaining hotel rooms. Should another unforeseen expenditure arise in the future pertaining to the referenced hotel room renovations, the County reserves the right to increase and/or decease its budget by a total of $50,000 using change orders that have been approved by the Indian River Board of County Commissioners. All of the other terms and conditions of Section 5 of the Fourth Amendment to Facility Lease Agreement remain in full force and effect. 3. Good Standing — No Violation. The County and Verotown agree that, as of the date of this Fifth Amendment, the Facility Lease Agreement is in good standing and neither party is in breach or violation of the terms and conditions of the Facility Lease Agreement. 4. Conforming Terms. All remaining terms and conditions of the Facility Lease Agreement are hereby conformed to be consistent with the amendments set forth herein. 5. Remaining Terms. All remaining terms and conditions of the Facility Lease Agreement not amended or conformed herein shall remain in full force and effect. 6. Recordation. A copy of this Fifth Amendment shall be recorded on the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Page 2 of 4 90 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed in their respective names as of the date set forth above. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Clerk of Court and Comptroller INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: -uM.. Pn`— $y�' i t.,r Deputy Clerk AFFIX SEAL: Approved: By. • .��,t cabtM/,'• Peter O'Bryan, Chairman i1`�''xApproved by BCC: Apri 1 1, 2014. .u tea; .../1r•• - ••••.tre, Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ] seph A. Baird, Administrator Signed and delivered in the presence of: Print name: Print name: VEROTO WN, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Verotown"), by POM Vtown, LLC, a California limited liability corporation, its Manager By: •-•-• Print Name: Peter O'Malley Print Title: Manager By: 11an Reingold County Attorney Page 3 of 4 91 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) On 1-dv-f , 2014, before me, NtfAl ? , personally appeared Peter 'O'Malley who proved to me on the basis of satisfgtory evidence to be the person(s) whose name() is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in hisAkref/k12e4F authorized capacity(4cs), and that by hisTher-7414eir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ERIN KELSEY NALL Commission iM 1999622 Notary Public - California I Los Angeles County Comm. Espiris Dec 1, 2016 (Seal) Page 4 of 4 92 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM CONSENT ITEM ST TO: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director THROUGH: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP Chief, Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement FROM: Kelly Buck Code Enforcement Officer DATE: 6/23/2014 RE: S. Allan Luihn's Request for Partial Release of an Easement at 1565 Wyn Cove Drive (Lot 14, Wyn Cove Subdivision) It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at the Board's regular meeting on July 1, 2014. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The County has been petitioned by S. Allan Luihn, owner of a lot at 1565 Wyn Cove Drive in Wyn Cove Subdivision, for partial release of a 10 -foot wide drainage and utility easement on the rear of the lot. The purpose of the partial easement release request is to account for an existing garage in the easement and to allow for a reconfiguration of the lot. The easement portion proposed for release is to be replaced with a utility easement dedicated to the City of Vero Beach for electric service use (see attached). ANALYSIS The request has been reviewed by AT&T; the Vero Beach Water and Sewer Department; the Vero Beach Electric Utility; Comcast Cable Services; the Indian River County Utilities Department; the County Road & Bridge and Engineering Divisions; the County surveyor; and the Wyn Cove Property Owner's Association. The Vero Beach Electric Utility is requiring that the applicant dedicate a replacement easement to allow for electric service, which the applicant has agreed to. None of the other utility providers or reviewing agencies expressed an objection to the requested partial release of easement. Therefore, it is staff's position that the requested partial easement release would have no adverse impact to utilities being supplied to the subject property or to other properties. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board, through adoption of the attached resolution, approve partial release of the 10 -foot rear yard drainage and utility easement described in the resolution. 93 94 ATTACHMENT j 95 ki C7 RodALF.31.00' Centro' enpe.10029'42' Are Lang h.61.36' BMUS WOW MD• Itrz sPmen r.YPE•1 sees a-AROWNV 1589'39'38'W 33.50' POINT OF BEGINNING LDI r?K u 4.f ss ir 0000 WYN COVE DRIVE (NON—RApAI m"' 44CG 3V7 y,' \ri+w�- 70.25• �.NolsoNotAY o N3 1 SU' 417 N Di soh. Nee AKur V On. Ore N89,39'8-£ 128.00' PARCEL .1.1401.000000101.001.0PAR= A PORTION OF LOT 14, OF WYN COVE SUBDIVISION, ACCORDINLEGAL DESCRIPTION: G TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, P PUBUC RECORDS Of NDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF THE NORTH 40.00 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2. SECTION 76771E TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANCE 40 EAST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED A5 FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 14; THENCE 000'20'22.5 ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID L07 14 AND AN EMERSION THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 143.16 FEET TO A POINT THAT I5 40.00 FEET SOUTH OF 771E SOUTH U116 OF SND LOT 14; THENCE 989'39'38'6 ALONG A UNE THAT IS PARALLEL TO AND 40,00 FEET SOUTH OF THE SND SOUTH 1846 OF LOT 14 ALSO BEING THE NORTH UNE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 BY PERPENDICULAR MEASUREMENT, A DISTANCE OF 128.00 FEET; THENCE 1414'32'00V A DISTANCE OF 144.42 70 AN INTERSECTION 6I111 THE EAST UNE OF SND LOT 14; THENCE N3307'2211' ALONG SAID FAST UNE OF LOT 14 A DISTANCE OF 10.25 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY UNE OF WYN COVE DRIVE BEING A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG ANGLE OF 100'29'42' FOR AN ARC DISTANC OF 61.39 FEET O THE THEYTERMINUSF R5ND CURVE AND IGHT OF WAY NA POINT 1 (INTERSECTION WIE AND CURVE THROUGH A H CENTRAL ON -TANGENT LINE: THENCE 589' 9'34014 E ALONG SAID NON -TANGENT LINE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY UNE A DISTANCE OF 33.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 0.35 ACRES MORE OF LESS. SURVEYOR'S NOTES 7.) TNS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR NOIGTE LAND OWNEASWP. 2.) THE S0151(1OR 00 NOT RESEARCH OR ABSTRACT TIE LAND RECORDS FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY. EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, DEED RESTRICTIONS. 50680 REGULATIONS, SETBACKS, LAND USE PLAN DE50N1T0N5, ADJONNG DEEDS, LIENS. MURPHY ACT ROHTS-OF-WAY, AREAS OF LOCAL CONCERN. OR OTHER SHAM JURISDICTIONAL DETEF04NATONS TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS TYPE OF IN66891109 IS SHOWN, R IS SIMIAN SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF INFORMATION PROV10E0 BY THE CUENT OR NfOR9A10N OTNERWSE KNOWN TO THE SURVEYOR AR0 MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. 3.) UutILESS NDERGROUND (TANIES, BLIRDNO FOUNDATIONS, AND OTHER UN0ER0RgRp FORS AP80V0,40/55 DERE NOT LOCATED, w IT 5 MOM sOLELY Ow THE ASIS OF SURFACE MACH :WS 0655TH SE WoicATEo. 10 THE U 8 T THAT DIM Um of 171E SUR7(YOR AND MAY 1401 01 B CC PliON is P IE AU. UN0EROROLNO UINIM5 MUST BE FIELD WASTED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION 4.) JUR4DICfIONAL WETLANDS ANO ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES HABITAT. O ANY. THAT MAY MST ON OR MOUND THE SURVEY 547E WERE NOT DETERMYWD OR LOCATED. 5.) THE SURVEY 0610 IS TIE FIELD DATE SHOWN N THE TITLE BLOCK, NOT DIE SIGNATURE OATS 6.) TRATE MAP MAIM HE SURVEY SITE LIES IN FLOOD SONE X', ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL 0400ENLY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE 7.) BEARINGS BASED ON1206103377H, THE T ASST Pnp ROON71NDT 111W NORTH ECEMBER 4, UN( OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 BEARS N.66.36'35'( 6.) ELEVA70N5 SHOWN ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM Of 1988 REFER[NCNG INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BENCHMARK 80 78 A 30' AT M ELEVATION OF 5.74 FEET(7NV084). LEGEND P• 61111 ME DR . CONCRETE MDNUNWT NC - 804 ROD NN CP R• WN ROD D - DENIDCA ON W, FORM F. 060611 11.. ELEVATOR FFE . MEMO 11008 ELEVATION 048 . OVDOIE49 TONS PA. - PLAT NOK OOR.A.' AM OFFK1AL RECORD TOOK ((I)) . CALCULATED (6) PLAT . EMOTED • OMIT 002 UTUTY PMR -D. 1Y MOM CERTIFIED TO: JAMEY WAIN REVISIONS REVISED DL3(AVDON MAP OF BOUNDARY a TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY GRAPHIC SCALE 1 0' 1U' 20' 40' DATE 1/27/14 FIELD BOOK 5O DRAWN SPC PAGE/ 12 SCALE l'.20' FIELD DATE 1216115 106• GLS -17-363 INDIAN RIVER SURVEY INC. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING AND PING CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. LB 7545 1835 20TH STREET, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 PHONE (772) 569.7880 FAX (772) 778-3617 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ONGINAL RAISED SEAL OFA FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STEVE CARTECHNE, L14690 DATE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR +'V'a..¢,lvan.JmnmF\+nw.yry .,-rL%k•eK Nr•.,. u.•..T-:: 96 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST PORTION OF EASEMENT TO BE VACATED THIS IS NOT A SURVEY r 0 1 Cn 1564 WYN COVE DRIVE LOT 14 TAX PARCEL 33401600001000000014.0 N00'20'22 "W 10.00' SHEET 2 OF 2 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SHEET 1 OF 2 N89 ;39'38 "E Scale: 1" • 20' WEST 58939'38"W SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 14 DRAWING NO.: 13-363 /135/ 6 589'39'38"W 142.00' S33 07'22 "E 11.89' 10.00' 157.00' SOUTH LINE OF LOT 14 NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 SECTION 16-33-40 TAX PARCEL PARCEL 33401600000002000001.0 M: \ORAMNGS\SURVEYS\PROJECTS\000-1RS-IJ\IRS 73-363\DWG\ !R5-73-363 - SKETCH & OESC.dw9 Feb. 06, 2014 - 1: 40pm View: ESMT TO VACA IF SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 14 PREPARED BY: INDIAN RIVER SURVEY, INC. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING AND MAPPING 97 SKETCH & DESCRIPTION SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST PORTION OF EASEMENT TO BE VACATED SHEET 1 OF 2 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SKETCH ON SHEET 2 OF 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE SOUTH 10.00 FEET OF LOT 14, OF WYN COVE SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 61 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 15.00 FEET THEREOF. SURVEYORS NOTES: 1.) BEARINGS BASED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 BEARS 589'39'38"W M: \DRAMNGS\SURVEYS\PROJECTS\000-1RS-1J\IRS 13-363\0WG\ IRS -13-363 - SKETCH & D£SC.dwg Feb. 05, 2014 - 1: J9pm View: ESMT TO VACATE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE STEVE CARTECHINE FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 4895 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #LB 7545 DATE OF SIGNATURE NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED PREPARED FOR: JAMEY LUIHN PREPARED BY: INDIAN RIVER SURVEY, INC. ADDRESS: 1835 20TH STREET, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 PHONE: (772) 569-7880 DRAWN BY: SPC CHECKED BY: REVISIONS: DRAWING NO. 13-363 98 BRUCE D. BARHETT6 USA THOMPSON BARNES 3.4 CALVIN B. BROWN GEORGE G. COLUNS, JR. 1 MICHAEL. J. GARAVAGLIA Collins, Brown, Caldwell, Barlett, Garavaglia & Lawn CHARTERED ATTORNEYS AT LAW 756 BEACHLAND BOULEVARD, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32963 RONALD HFJTH LAWN 2.6 POST OFFICE BOX 3686, VERO BEACH, FL 32964-3686 NICHOLAS L. BRUCE=.' AARON V. JOHNSON C. DOUGLAS VITIJNAC WILLIAM W. CALDWELL, OF COUNSEL STEVEN L. HENOERSON, OF COUNSEL TELEPHONE: 772-231-4343 FACSIMILE: 772-234-5213 EMAIL: CBC O@VEROLAW.COM • WEBSITE: WWW.VEROLAW.COM June 3, 2014 HAND DELIVERY Wayne R. Coment City of Vero Beach Attorney 1053 20th Place Vero Beach, FL 32960 RE: Release of Easement: 1565 Wyn Cove Drive Dear Wayne: 1 BOARD CERTIFIED REAL. ESTATE 2 MASTER OF LAWS TAXATION 3 MASTER OF LAWS REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT 4 MASTER OF LAWS ESTATE PLANNING AND ELDER LAW 5 CERTIFIED CIRCUIT MEDIATOR 6 ALSO ADMITTED IN DC AND SC I ALSO ADMITTED M GA 6 ALSO ADMITTED IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS As I mentioned on the telephone, my client recently requested the release of a utility easement at the above -referenced address. The request was denied because the City of Vero Beach Electric Utility had an underground primary within the easement. At this time, I am transmitting to you a replacement Utility Easement Deed, which was prepared by your office. This Utility Easement Deed is being delivered to you to be held in escrow until release of the existing easement has been approved, and the release of the existing easement and this new Utility Easement Deed can be recorded at the same time. By copy of this letter to Kelly Buck and to Roland DeBlois at Indian River County, I am asking the County to reactivate the request for abandonment of the easement. I am also copying this transmittal to Peggy Lyon of your office, and to Ted Fletcher at the Vero Beach Electric Utilities Department, so that they can take whatever steps are necessary to notify Ms. Buck and Mr. DeBlois at Indian River County that the release of the easement can proceed. ATTACHMENT 2 REAL PROPERTY LAW & REAL ES UE CLOSINGS • PUNNING, ZONING. LAND USE LAW • IMUS, TRUSTS & ESPIES PLANNING . CIVIL & BUSINESS TRIAL PRACTICE • CORPORATE & BUSINESS ORGANVATO(. CONSTRUCTION LAW • GUARDIANSHIP . INSURANCE LAW • HEALTH LAW • PERSONAL INJURY AND WRONGFUL DEATH • CRIMINAL • PROBATE & TRUST ADMI NISTR 10N • FAMILY LAW 9 Wayne R. Coment June 3, 2014 Page 2 If anything else is required, please let me know. I am also enclosing a check in the amount of $44.70 made payable to the Clerk of Court to cover the cost of recording the replacement easement. Very truly yours, Bruce Barkett For the Firm BB:bb Encl. cc: Jamey Luihn Kelly Buck Roland DeBlois / Peggy Lyon Ted Fletcher 100 Prepared by and return to: Office of the City Attorney P.O. Box 1389 Vero Beach, FL 32961-1389 UTILITY EASEMENT DEED (2014 -EG -0147) (7W-K-eAcEj4krr—".1) THIS INDENTURE made and entered into this day of 2014, by and between S. ALLAN LUIHN (the "Grantor"), whose mailing address is 114 Annandale Drive, Cary, NC 27511, and THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation (the "Grantee"), whose mailing address is P.O. Box 1389, Vero Beach, FL 32961- 1389: (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: That Grantor is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property (the "Property") lying, situate and being in Indian River County, Florida and more particularly described as Property conveyed by Warranty Deed dated May 20, 1998, as recorded on May 20, 1998 in OR Book 1210, Page 2860, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. That Grantor, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby grants to the Grantee, its successor and assigns, a public utility easement, which easement is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" (the "Easement Premises"), attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and which easement shall run with and be a burden upon the Property. Grantor hereby reserves for himself, his successors, heirs and assigns, the right to use the Easement Premises for purposes not inconsistent with the Easement granted herein, including without limitation, the right of ingress, egress and passage by Grantor and his employees, agents, customers, and invitees, over, across, and through the Easement Premises. Grantor further grants to the Grantee, its agents, employees, contractors, and assigns, a general ingress/egress easement over and across its driveways, parking, common and open areas of the Property for the purpose of access to, and/or maintenance of, any of the Grantee's improvements. Grantee shall not be otherwise responsible for maintenance of the Easement Premises. The undersigned hereby covenant and warrant that Grantor owns the said land described herein and the undersigned, as or on behalf of Grantor, has the right to grant this easement. Page 1 of 3 101 N:\CI ientDocs\P W ENG\Easements\ 14- 15-4. LUI HN. u ti I ity.2014-EG-0147.cpm. msl. apr2014. docx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly authorized and caused this Indenture to be executed in his name as of the day and year first herein written. WITNESS: Sign: Print: Sign: Print: C>cuc.0 SmozzA. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER GRANTOR: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ' ' day of , 2014, by S. Allan Luihn. He is [circle one] personally known to me OR produc [describe ID shown] X) A/�- as identification, and [circle ne] did OR did not take an oath. Notary Public My Commission No.: My Commission Expires: "" BARBARA A. BEA11Y MY COMMISSION Y EE 853938 • EXPIRES: March 21, 2017 %t g" Bonded Duo Notary Public Underwriters Page 2 of 3 N:\ClientDocs\PWENG\Easements\14-15-4.LUIHN.utiI ity.2014-EG-0147.cpm.msl.apr2014.docx 102 ACCEPTANCE OF CONVEYANCE The foregoing conveyance is hereby accepted by the City of Vero Beach, Florida, as evidenced by the signature of the undersigned, who is authorized to accept this conveyance. ATTEST: CITY OF VERO BEACH Tammy K. Vock City Clerk Richard G. Winger Mayor [CITY SEAL] Date: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Approved as conforming to municipal policy: Margaret S. Lyon James R. O'Connor Assistant City Attorney City Manager Approved as to technical requirements: Monte K. Falls Director, Public Works Page 3 of 3 N:\ClientDocs\P W ENG\Easements\ 14-15-4.LUIHN.utility.2014-EG-0147.cpm.msl.apr2014.docx 103 Property Description 1565 Wynn Cove Dr (#2014 -EG -0147) April 9, 2014 EXHIBIT "A" PROPERTY DESCRIPTION UTILITY EASEMENT 2014 -EG -0147• PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 16-33-40 Parcel #33-40-16-00000-0020-00001.0 Situated in the State of Florida, County of Indian River, and being a part of the north 40 feet of Government Lot 2, Section 16, Township 33 South, Range 40 East, Indian River County and being. more particularly bounded and described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of Lot 14 of Wyn Cove Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 61 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; Thence S00°20'22"E along the west line of said Lot 14 for a distance of 103.16 feet to the southwest comer of said lot 14 and the Point of Beginning of the herein described utility easement; Thence N89°39'38"E along the, south line of said Lot 14 for a distance of 10.00 feet; Thence SO0°20'22"E for a distance of 30.00 feet; Thence N89°39'38"E.along a line that is parallel with and 30.00 feet south of the said south line of Lot 14, said line also being the north line of Government Lot 2, for a distance of 113.86 feet; Thence N44°39'38"E for a distance of 32.53 feet; Thence N89°39'38"E along a line that is parallel with and 7.00 feet south of the south line of said Wyn Cove Subdivision and the north line of said Govemment Lot 2, for a distance of 99.96 feet; Thence S00°20'22"E for a distance of 10.00 feet; Thence S89°39`38"W for a distance of 95.82 feet; Thence S44°39'38'W for a distance of 32.53 feet; Thence.S89°39'38'W along a line that is parallel with and 40.00 feet south of the said south line of Lot 14 for a distance of 128.00 feet; Thence NO0°20'22' W along an extension of the said west line of Lot 14 for a distance of 40.00 feet to the said southwest comer of Lot 14 and the Point of Beginning. Said easement containing 2,863 square feet more or Tess. S:1Property Descriptions1201412014-EG-17 1565 Wynn Cove Dr Apr 9 2014.doc Sheet 1 of 2 • David R. Gay, PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 61 O o o } • 1575 WYN COVE DRIVE 0 N O O 0 0 0 N 0 O 0 o 0 oct Ia to a 0 J W O 0. 1565 WYN COVE DRIVE 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 'I' O I- . O 0 -� W I 0 M O 0) 0 w co 0 a S00'20'22"E 0' EASEMENT Z - W 0 o z W U O z 0 0 1- z 0 0 103.16' z' - Z o up Z_ w I-- W Z 0 mo I1 0 O1- Z W ao N89'39.'38"E o• 1,• W', A :c •• O g m E 0 Z z c0 co ri w co � w M 1-• W O 00 m vca D M 0) 0) N 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O E- 0 o O 0 0 0 1 M (0 In � \ • J W 0 IX a y D ag S00'20'22"E \ o ,10, 30.00' \ n n 0 i (n }U) Y (0 _n N00'20'22'W m "k 0 40.00' . z o 0 0 aF Y D Q U 0 o U=) W J z 0 - ''' Q 03 z I- 1 .( 0 0_ d W F -n 6EE z z 1.1.Z 4-9-2014. >- K Q 0 0 vi - Uco Lil 2 Z a �w O rn d J N 0 j v 0 w CD U) w• 5 O 5 zz 0z IL z �' cFi o m O z W U N W - W }' W 0.-1 41 -t i O tr Q > W� 0a_ ix z z WD in (n 105 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 - A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELEASING A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT ON LOT 14, WYN COVE SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Indian River County has an interest in a drainage and utility easement on Lot 14 of Wyn Cove Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the retention of a portion of the easement, as described below, serves no public purpose; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DOES HEREBY RELEASE and abandon all right, title, and interest that it may have in the following described easement portion: the south ten (10) foot drainage and utility easement less and except the west fifteen (15) feet of such easement of Lot 14, Wyn Cove Subdivision, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 61 of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. This release of easement is executed by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960. THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted on the day of 2014, by the following vote: Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice -Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk ATTACHMENT 3 106 RESOLUTION NO. 2014 - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: County Attorney ease.bccdoc proj/apl. no. 2014020047/72126 Cc: Applicant: LUIHN, S ALLAN Bruce Barkett, Esq. 107 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Department of Public Works Division of Facilities Management Date: July 8th, 2014 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Through: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director From: Chris Burr, Facilities Manager/Project Manager Subject: Crime Scene Unit- Final Payment of Retainage- Donadio and Associates CONSENT BACKGROUND: On September 8, 2009 The Board approved a Professional Services Agreement with Donadio and Associates, P. A. to perform a spatial needs analysis and site master plan (Phase 1) and design of an evidence storage facility (Phase II). During the completion of the Phase I work the county purchased property adjacent to the Sheriff site (formerly Sunsky Roofing). This site includes two structures intended for adaptive reuse by the Sheriffs Department Crime Scene Unit and other divisions. All work has been completed for Phase I and Phase II. Donadio and Associates are requesting final payment of all retainage in the amount of $5,269.41. FUNDING: For this project, $1,071,097 has been budgeted in Impact Fees and $1,575,803 in Optional Sales Tax. Funding for Final Payment of Retainage is available from Impact Fees/Retainage-Donadio/Crime Scene Unit Bldg. Renovation (Account #103-206000-01004). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the final pay request from Donadio and Associates in the amount of $5,269.41. Approved Agenda Item For: July 1. 2014 By: ill 71, • OCI Indian River Co. Approved Date Administration - 04R County Attorney -y Budget ` I ' Division /0 Department Cy.„.. 6 20 108 Donadio and Associates, Architects, P.A. 609 17th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone 772 794 2929 Fax 772 562 8600 Retainage Invoice DATE: April 28, 2014 FOR: Indian River County 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Attention: Chris Mora, Public Works Director Project No. 2011-31.002 Indirtr; Hiver County Sheriff's Department Vehicle Compound Billing Group: 002 Invoice Reference Invoice Retainage Retainage Amount Date Amount Balance Due 3931 Retainage for Invoice 3931 06/28/13 $196.59 $196.59 $196.59 3940 Retainage for Invoice 3940 08/01/13 $98.30 $98.30 $98.30 3963 Retainage for Invoice 3963 09/03/13 $2,574.34 $2,574.34 $2,574.34 3995 Retainage for Invoice 3995 10/03/13 $344.70 $344.70 $344.70 3999 Retainage for Invoice 3999 11/01/13 $298.23 $298.23 $298.23 4022 Retainage for Invoice 4022 12/04/13 $175.00 $175.00 $175.00 4053 Retainage for Invoice 4053 01/13/14 $588.10 $588.10 $588.10 4079 Retainage for Invoice 4079 02/03/14 $217.23 $217.23 $217.23 4091 Retainage for Invoice 4091 03/05/14 $338.23 $338.23 $338.23 4137 Retainage for Invoice 4137 04/02/14 $438.69 $438.69 $438.69 Total $5,269.41 $5,269.41 Retainage Total Due: $5,269.41 109 Public Hearing - 7.1.14 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Board of County Commissioners Dylan Reingold, County Attorney c),11-- June 20, 2014 Proposed Ordinance Amending Section 300.02 (Prohibited hours of sale, service and consumption) BACKGROUND. On May 20, 2014, the City Council of the City of Vero Beach voted to extend the hours that alcohol can be served within the City of Vero Beach from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Additionally, the City Council voted to include a sunset provision, with a date of June 15, 2015. Although not contained in the ordinance, the City Council requested that the Chief of Police prepare a report of the effects of the ordinance and bring such report to the Council before the ordinance is sunsetted. At its June 3rd meeting, the Board directed the County Attorney to draft a similar ordinance. The proposed ordinance amends Section 300.02 (Prohibited hours of sale, service and consumption) of the Code of Ordinances of Indian River County to extend the hours for the sale, service and consumption of alcoholic beverages in a licensed premises from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Additionally, the proposed ordinance includes a sunset time of 1:00 a.m. on June 15, 2015, unless reviewed and saved through reenactment of such amendment by the Board of County Commissioners. This is the same date and time used in the City of Vero Beach ordinance. Approved for B.C.C. /Public Hearing July 1, 2014 :;;NTY ATTORNEY .77: GEA'FRI/.B ('(' Ig Ja•liemosltie of Beverages Ordinance. Jac 110 Indian River Co. A . oved Date Admin. i 0.247/1 Co. Atty. If' Budget $-.411/ Department..e, Risk Management - --- 110 Release of Easement Page 2 ATTACHMENTS 1. Map(s) depicting easement proposed for release. 2. Applicants' attorney correspondence with proposed replacement easement. 3. Proposed County resolution partially releasing the existing easement. APPROVED: I.R. (Uunty Approved Date Admin. (141/ Legal "j�\, Budget5 C Dept. .5' 0 3/1÷ Risk Mgr. ease.bccmemo proj./appl. no. 2014020047/72126 94 Board of County Commissioners June 20, 2014 Page Two FUNDING. There is no additional funding associated with this agenda item. RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Chairman open the public hearing, take public input, and close the public hearing, and that the Board of County Commissioners then consider adoption of the attached proposed ordinance. ATTACHMENT. Proposed Ordinance DR:LAC ,1:' GENERA J.'d f ('.1gendn Memos Sole of Beverages Ordinance. duc 111 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 300.02 (PROHIBITED HOURS OF SALE, SERVICE AND CONSUMPTION) OF CHAPTER 300 (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES) OF THE CODE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO ALLOW THE SALE, SERVICE, AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES UNTIL 2:00 A.M.; PROVIDING FOR SUNSET AT 1:00 A.M. ON JUNE 15, 2015; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Vero Beach recently voted to extend the permitted hours for the sale, service, and consumption of alcoholic beverages from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and WHEREAS, having separate hours for the sale, service and consumption of alcoholic beverages for the City of Vero Beach and the unincorporated areas of Indian River County would create confusion and unfair competition; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. Enactment Authority. Article VIII, §1 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes vest broad home rule powers in counties to enact ordinances, not inconsistent with general or special law, for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety and welfare of the residents of the county. The Board specifically determines that the enactment of this ordinance is consistent with general or special law, and is necessary and appropriate to promote the health, safety and welfare of the residents of Indian River County. Section 2. Findings. The Board finds that the above "Whereas" clauses are true and correct, and hereby incorporates such clauses as findings of the Board. Section 3. Amendment of Section 300.02 (Prohibited hours of sale, service and consumption) of Chapter 300 (Alcoholic Beverages) of the Code of Indian River County (the "Code"). CODING: Words in strike-thfough format are deletions to existing text; words in underlined format are additions to existing text. 1 112 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - Section 300.02 (Prohibited hours of sale, service and consumption) of Chapter 300 (Alcoholic Beverages) of the Code of Indian River County is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 300.02. Prohibited hours of sale, service and consumption. (1) Prohibited hours. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold, served, or consumed in any licensed premises between x:99 2:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. except as hereinafter provided. (2) New Years. The time 4-:-99 2:00 a.m. specified in paragraph (1) of this section is extended to 3:00 a.m. on January 1 of each year. Sunset. The amendment, pursuant to Ordinance 2014- adopted July 1, 2014, of the commencement time of the prohibited hours of sale, service, and consumption of alcoholic beverages provided in this section 300.02 from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. shall sunset and automatically revert to 1:00 a.m. on June 15, 2015, unless reviewed and saved through reenactment of such amendment by the Board of County Commissioners. Section 4. Severability. If any part of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such holding and shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. Codification. It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provisions of this ordinance shall become and be made part of the Indian River County Code, and that the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered and the word ordinance may be changed to section, article or such other appropriate word or phrase in order to accomplish such intention. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal, on the day of June, 2014, for a public hearing to be held on the 1St day of July, 2014, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and adopted by the following vote: CODING: Words in sfirile4hFeugh format are deletions to existing text; words in underlined format are additions to existing text. 2 113 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 - Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this day of July, 2014. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk ylan Reingold, County Attorney EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance was filed with the Florida Department of State on the day of ,2014. CODING: Words in strike -through format are deletions to existing text; words in underlined format are additions to existing text. 3 114 MT: SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS •' Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 SCRIPPS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Sherri Cipriani, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ad Pub Customer Number Date Copyline PO # INDIAN RIVER CO ATTORNEY 2629994 6/19/2014 NOTICE OF INTENT-HEARIN(PT 300 ALCOHOL Sworn to and subscribed efore me this day of, June 19, 2014, by Li N\l \\L .,��C� G���� , who is Sherri Cipriani [X] personally known to me or [ ] who has produced G Mary T. Byrne Notary Public es..014.4,4 MARY T BYRNE �' Notary Public • State of Florida �` •s My Comm. Expires Aug 2, 2014 FAV Commission 0 EE 7134 as identification. NEWSPAPER E -Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES ORIGINAL //X / 1N UPT OF4010 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT N AND FOR INDIAN RIVER CASE 2013-.410063 DIVISION: WELLS FARGO BANPlaimiif,NA 4160,11*4l t al, NOTICE OF SALE PCHAENA 050 NOTICE IS HEREBY . IVPursuant to '''EN1osueand darem Mae'Ierted . n C 13•CA-000733 l the Cir<BrtentnI I n Nine pJ i 1 Circuit in end for Indian P'rver Counry, Florida In nick WAelly Fns 016,91,0 d r5[09!,. M8rk Alba, • Key. 1 Tnt erri Kayla Terri Albe, r del dans, he Indian Ihe ct C2lunkwill :2 vboeaidde` for rives h i `re Iaredoee.e m.Indian River Indian River County Attorney's Of... try N i Ad Number: Insertion Number: Section-Page-Zone(s): 1 Col x 136 ag NOTICE OF INTENT - P 0 Q Thursday, June 19, 2014 12 • SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS • THURSDAY, JUNE 19, 2014 • IR NOTICE OF 'FORECLOSURE I6TIFacsimile 0.1 761.75 Gamea. s.9Esq. Fl 3nnB39 NOSI44e nver01 u, 1isabibry na ngaiioade eedeamo paticipate in this en1i3e,an °aa. vmmnproymen Please sonnet Clerk of Court Adminttra- 100 E. O lion,sap.rt`,'li ]2-29B- 6,59 .t least ]days before reyourd- ne 411 e md711,-, dtenlia`iion�nkf the before the scheduled a ea - is less than ] days; it you are near. ipzi°ed, r268 0l5. im Pube June 26, TCN2631950 NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE ORS, TRSTEES SPOUSES, UOR 0TH - ER CLAIMANTS, Defendants. NOTICE OF SALE Native is hereby pry- that, pursuant Ftito u inters[ ersd o Moiuen idmi4n, na County, flondian rnathe lark ehall ,el the PlrO.7,7,lx nbeddrry LOF BAST 1 HIGH11L1 ANDS, UNI T 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF INT. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT !NAND FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO 31. 013-CA.0a 66 GREEN TREE SERVIC- ING ERVILINC LLC PlainiX, E LI2ABETH SANTIA- GO; UNKNOWN TENANT 1; UN- KNOWN TENANT 2; AND ALL UN- NAPARTIES CLAIMING ING BY, THROUGH, UNDER OR AGAINST THE FEN0ANTISIE WHOO IISIAREI NOT KNOWN TO BE 0RALIVE, UN- KNOWN PARTIES IES DEVISEES. 60050- 011104*. 4 EDIIT- AS PECONOED IN PLAT 9005 8, PUBLICPAGEISI 46, OF THE RECIPES OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PSEda BAMSTIANHOLES ST, , Fl 3295845]1 npublic sale, t° Orr i9neto .ca best Deb byC o cash, online electronic sale as rev^ °feclse 4Tt$ o ninJule at al1OWAM. 111°° remaining st fdo a claim NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE TAM MCDONALD FBN 43941 485130059 NOS Be quests ler Ann m dations Per • wi1M1 Disabili- ties. ll ydu area per- who w aanyath *2520016l191 to [M1is p e oa titled, to you, to me c ost of cvruin Islosis • ncun 60 144 rtion, 50 NE Country Club Drive, Suite 07, 0 986, 5[, Lupci<, FL 3,1996, n2- d]-03]0 et leas[ ] ays belorrou^°eur peni ncetl mor idi- nely on ivin this no(a iHif the scme heduled before ched apar- ance e less than days it Y°u are hear lr wieed, ran nii r Pub: June 12, 19 2014 TCN2619943 161 eleeOrk no Isaer. a s fie to file i via, It you ou will Ilbe you .nv r.m.�nmg .nee Dated at St. Peters- burg,dFloridat[AM1ya y ofD2uglea G Zahn, P.A. Ema7112dnles: efili12 som 425.h Scree No.. Suite 200 St. Partebu 1. nsF. Tetep6787 N°. (]*59 2x911 A rney ler tM1e Plaintill NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE 10.00AM Fl4orhe 1st day of July, 2014, the I011owing described Pr:7,7 7t, n a l Judgment of Fore 9, do1 LOT BLOCKS, VFP0 LANE ES TATES1UOT THF PLATTHEREOF, AS 40 086, IN PLAT BOOOK 6, PAGE 22. F THE PUBLICDI% ROS OF INAN RIVER COUNT8Y, 8OP1 22 f0000HNFFL 339680 3295 Any person claiming interestan l e su plus fromthe sale, if any, other than the Phe e`a a 01 the'Lis Pendens must file a claim v shin 60 days after the sale. Dated �iyn 'illshomuen Cal0e Flor;da,u^hes 2014.Old Erik Der0Oile Enk F,70.01;';`);;; Alherte�li;a p P13.0.9oe 333633 20 nmpn2,1F<L T03 s5ry `rvozlawhalnendli iew,com 18960E01 NOS Requests for Accom- modations ccent modaai s o ubteetlP r Ions with Oiebli • nr1s.w d;eY om<eeth etldneeds nocost'tae Plea traUt`COun Ad 'N °n. 350 NE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN ANO FORINOMNLWVE COUNTy,FLORIA NIL ACTION GSE NO.: 313004 DMSION'. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA Plaint,, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES. GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES, LIENORS, GRED - !TORS, TRUSTEES, OR OTHER CLAIM- ANTS CLAIMING BV, THROUGH, UNDER, OR GAINST, JOSEPH KEEG0N MOA J1. SEPX N KEEGAN.C.SED,R. AIKIA JOSEPH J. KEEGAN, DECEASED, et el. Defene.nnn. NCI TI E OF FORECLOSURE SALE 50110E IS HEREBY GIVEN Our6am to a E. '10'42,7'2714 10'427'27 of M1T11 F°recnsure 31-20 -C 2, 2831mtlentered it Case No. 11 of the rcuit Court or he INDIAN Judicial Gmud in and for INDIAN RIVER County. Florian wherein WELL1 F0 UNK BANK, NA rs ane RISEN d TEE UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, O.,TR ASSIGNEES, LIENORS, CRE0. USTEES. OR OTHER CLAIM- ANT S, TRUSTEES. NST,, JOSEPHTKEEGANXM(IA JO- SEPH J. KEEGAN, JR. A/K/A JOSEPH J. KEEGAN , DECEASED; SOLOMON R WAT- SON. N; MARGARET S. SHRECK, AS HEIR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH KEEGAN AMA JOSEPH J. KEEGAN, JR. AIK1A JO- SEPH J. KEEGAN, DECEASED; ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN PART6S CLAIMING BY, HEREIN NAMED AND AGAINST THE HEREIN NAM * NOT DUAL TO BE DENTIS WHO ARE NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD N ALIVE, IR SAID UN- KNOWN PARTIES MAVAY CLAIM AIM AN INTER- EST EEREST AS SPOUSE, HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES OR OTHER AL CLAIMANTS: PI AL: MI RIVER G. 0*11fl IA. AND ASSOC!.AL. *15*, IA G, SCOTT WE. ANN ALT ATOS; 4, *09 POWER ORTHOPEDIC AND LIGHT COMPANY; VETO ORTNOPEOIL II PA.; she Oelenda019 The Clerk 21 ane Coun will edl to the naehee rine betlboddnlfor c v w ,b,2 4,nt 0]/01120.4. `henfos lawngos- 'deseribe° PmPeny s fora id Fnal Juegme 1 CAST COR- NERMOF THE WEST 20 0 ACRESEOF TRACT 1, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 33 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE GST GENE0AL PIAT OF LASS OF THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY, FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE W05 2 LOUE *. 4664 LUCRE,IN PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 25: THENCE RUN SOUTH 1 LINEWEST20 ACRES OF SAIDTRACT1 TOA POINT OF BEGINNING' THENCE RUN WEST AND PARALLEL 10 NORTH 0001 OF TRACT 1 A O 11*0 09 F 300 PEST TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF 35 FOOT PRIVATE POA*; THENCE CORTIN* NSTANCE OF 1n5 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE F SAI PRIVATE 9000: THENCE EASTSLI EHOFLTHENWE T 220L*600* OF SAID TRACT 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 10 ACRES OF THE WEST 20 ACRES OF TRACT 1, THENCE RUN EAST- ERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID NORTH 10 ACRES OF THE WEST 20 FEEETDE o THE TRACT 1.LIADIST DISTANCE NATE ROAO:THENCE CONTINUE EASTERLY A00 FEET TO TME A6i LOINEAOF THE WEST 20 ACES OF SAID TRACT 1: LNG SAI° EAST THENCE RUN NORTH A 1, T OF THE WEST 0 ACRE5IN TRACT 1, TO NO POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,EMOA MCA 29TH AVENUE, VETO BEACH. FL A v Perron .aiming an nmaa me ar. lux Dom IM1a ale it any saner then [M1e n env own a fah. ante al the Lig Peed ens mus !le v claim wiaM1in day 1601 vers Gnat the sale. P°naltl P W°11e N 9,s, 51,1 018 P.O. Baa 35x16 Tempe FbrY1ei3136fi:M Hort Bar Na.91611 Fe ] IrdA 2da.Eo6 p by Person 6'ah OisaBltes you area ;anon wtA a 6126ry who n as e!ry acamma6av0n °roar m entitled, at ale m Nis you, to M1e you are anti lee, . no wan you, t t provision f anon assistance. Plewa son 049. S1116a211. , 250 NW Counry Club Dnve. Sults 21], Pon 51. Lucie, ore 31900 T77 -607 -scheduled CO a Mea 3 r.,aan er firth art .meaplee a°an wearer., r �m- iatvly unpo recew 9 tai, n vifieation fthe time helms m. .meaulaL pear arsee i6 tae than T days a you ae n:aHng pand,al!]tt. Putr June 13, 19, x01c0 TCN262,41 NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE JUDICIAND FOAL CIRCUITP N IEMN ttRIVER VED COUN,CTION DA CIVIL ACTION 2x13 GD1MIN': IVISION'. WEIRS FARGO BANK, N.A. SUC- CESSOR BY MERG- ER TO WACHOVIA BANK. NA., %ainuH, .RAGEORGES, LE. 0.61266)161. NO0CEOFSALE 00010 PE TO CHAPTER 45 N TICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Pursuant t° a Elora Jpa a ed May 21 a014.. aStire ndr en- tered n Case No. 2013 CA 000915 al the Circuit Court I e Nineteenth Judi- IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE JUDICIAL CIPCURCOUNTY, FLORIDA0 RIVER ML ACTION CASE NO m13 CA 000923 DIVISION. WELLS FARGO BANK NA, Plaintiff, HURST, REGINALD Rat al. Defendants/. NOTICE OFSALE PURSUANT iO CHAPTER 45 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Fursu.0 to a F: nal Judt °f Foreclosure dared on or bout rSY 3, 201,1, antl en ere° Case fie ,9 7,, [n 246* .l Ci cuituin andrtlar Wells Fargo B Countyy, 6 rids and Wells Fares Bank, NA, Inc., n the PlaintiffiRand Clerk of the Circuit Co `rt,i910, River County, Florida, Reginald R Hur0, Richard G. Petersen,Seabian,2lnc.,Sl seVero l Flori- da1'eaUnknOwnSpouse f Reginald R. Hurst wlde Ramona Hurst,Unhea States of America, Secretary of Housing end Urban Development.. a defendants, the ndian gwe2N k °,2 tVlas n low in/on M1 eiM/www:nal n orNrYorerony 10moilaeRrcof °NTO4h following described Pro.. dinaINmaOLOTcauo- WOOD VETO, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 11,PAGE 11, OF THE PUBLIC 0005 RE- CORDS *0050105RIVAR COUNTY, FLORIDA;RIBEING MORE PARTICULARLY AT A POINT AS FOLG3.8*00 BEGINNING 20 A PORE BEING 36.95 FEET WET ANT 20.27 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT JI ROI SANDALWOOD OF VETO DEGREES THENCE RUN OS*S 09 DEGREES So HE SOU 15 SEC - 005 ORDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH FACE OF THE BUILDING, A DISTANCE OF 306 FEET TO A PORE: SAID PORE BEING TH THE MENTOF UHF NG O. THENCE 0*00 RUN WALL E RE S 09 MINUTES RUN NORTH 6 DEGREES S MINUTES 35 LINE.ASECONDS 5105 ALONG SAID CENTER PE. A DISTANCE B 40.09 FEET TE A POINT:5611SAID POINT BEING THE IN0609 SECTION OFTHE NO EAST -WEST COMMON WALL AND THE NORTH -SOUTH COM- MON WALL; THENCE PUN SOURS 89 OF GROES 50 MINUTES 35 EOF THE EAST, ALONG THE COMMON OF THE EAST- WEST AST- 40E FEET TO ON WALL, A DISTANCE OF 40.00*FEETAS A PORE; SAID PORE BE WC THE EAST FACE OF THE SOUTHENCE RUN 0 DEGREES ODO N09' MIINUTES 35 SECONDS WESTA DISTANCE OF NG 40 FACE FEET iO A POIAID IE; pi10TP sOUTH FATE OF0THE9UICOIIN6 DISTANCE 6 FE, TTE 1O H' POI CE OF 1 .NT OF 339BEGINNING 662]911 39TH AVE VERO BEACH FL AM personlaiming an rotates„ in rhe sus pia from the axle, !f any. o er N he P ndenfi must fle'a chem awnin160Ndayv after the sale. 'd Lira and fy 1 die Rive 24A Florida in w2hi Wells Fargo hank. N.A. succNsor by `97374°.0..Y.'7,;. Plaintiff and Kenneth J. Macomber, Lillian t1Nna14Bl tide Asso iation. are tandems, unthe Indian Clert rap cumi1 0920 wdf dela to a highest bect binder lox ntipvlwwlw.indian. Bore los con, Inan River oaAM alori a NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. AIKIA 055 39TH CT 396638294 BEACH FL Any person cllaiming plus interest in axle, a nthe v, d a e'Lif Pendens mu must a shim within 60 drys after the ale. Deed m RIrrb°rouen aauma Fmdm, In, th d.y at June, "'in Megan Poach McRL Ba"6`103E150 io tJ"c1=1me haw 9 ae. b°e rro < vied of `f°h Judgment Fore daaareent - LSEBA• 9STIANCHIGH- "[COP IGN- "[COS UNIT t1. ROING HER ▪ P E0OFR PAS RLAET T- LOflDG IN PLAT BOOK ],PAGES 56, OF THE RUBRIC RE c0R05 CFOINUAN RIVER NTDIY, LORIOA. 3]4 JOY HAVEN DR 6-6204SEBASTIAN FL 340 566200 Any pereon plusan interest the rthe - claiming en, other than [M1e pnepd7te IthesLas °g147:1=.101.' Counry, FlGrida, tnis Roars 0.d�nlRo610 617 RL Bar a 16150 AlberteLaw Attorney for Plaint. P.O. Baa 23029 NOTICE OF NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE ADMINISTRATION Pub: June 19, 26, NOTWITHSTANDING 3010 T0E TIME PERI00 TCN163a059 SET FORTH ABOVE, ANY CLAIM FSL EO TWO 121 YEARS OR E AFTER THE DECEDENT'S DATE OF DEATH IS Servic id1d03623 Nrveaiewnammeffi 211 g11B32Fg1 Nos Reque s sot Ari m sons with by Per i b Drsabiei- sllir Nsebdiry 1114%1111n 'ic o mho 111 n'i`n n to partic. his this 'toNeau,tothe provision 1 certain vain 1:11'2118'14,Z!istrationrvE Country Club Drive, 217, Port 51. 801,4 310 0L, 349e6, 61 1 ]�d.t lea I f aao'e bemr< r , or invneth- .tel nniil receiving a'hed bled°. e e i lase iAan `> drys or you re hea 20Ia°ed,rca':e'l1t 1 14 June 19 TCN2629953 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATION IN THE CIRCUIT BARRED. COURT FOR INDIAN The date of first path- RNER COUNTY, cation of this notice FLORIDA is June 13,1014. PROBATE OMSION 3120140°066 IN STATE OF Decea se Schroeder a . Pendens mus[ lila a dam wnhm 6o save after the sale. Dred In Hillsborough Albenaui law '6732'2%T.'"'" T9e7 aoLd].]1 4*hH6la waalbenellilew.c om RITh Ott. Yamu at1 Etsabiliywho needs any es... d atan oder`a Paad aalathim 74ee0°05 provision certain assistance. Plass cork t Court Administration, 250 NE Country Club , 01R- 6S1udeJ0211t Pan L0,1, ieMfFa, the, scheduled court appearance, r rot ietteff r. Devi a Chi, 4obnad°n hn lass Mane`Ihe hyoular par 2422 1, IRAs titan 1 days a you 2re hearing aued,a11111, Pub�Junett;19,3011 TU42629954 0YFbeddauns 204 til Erik Oel'Emi 54 Erik DllEaai VIIL Nbenelll Law r1/.1371]]p2gainliX )813s231d]43623 1b]131 NOSenelli FOt NOS Requ`ests 1°r "FT m °'aith Dish,. es.Wllo ere was needs pe a an ' odemo..dation in 'n th r [a Proc'pa is iaipate naup2 mn11.4 r<e °m. provision of certain Pleas contact Court Admim G• y ,26 5DrivNe E, Suite 1, Port S2. Lae. FLna)03.11.g7daybelore yep scheduledcauipenance, or immedi- ately s notification H the u.che°u1.a . 6.7912 102 t - . less 1069 J 000 ale mar- Iz ed, al!]11, Pub: June 11, 19, 2014 IN 100 CIRCUR CNUET OFTHE NEL ENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2011fALW967 GENERAL LITIGATION DIVISION PAL A550'C"ATI ON 605*ES SB TOPVC BANK S MERG IAD PBCAR, SUC ER O INDIAN PNEP NATIONAL BANK, Plaintill, THE UNKNOWN HEIRS,0015 0*, PIFs, DEVISE E5, EtatCgGNEES, LIENORS. EDITORS. 1PU5- EEES, ANO All MAY EPS WHO MAV CLAIM AN INTEREST IN THE ESTATE OF 1062629950 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE "?,04,1720 R CU N INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA 01011 A01GI11* NO '1"6°,422,7: EVERBANK., vv in , MASSEY, SHULER W. D14d.0101. Person Giving Noce F;2.7 Beach. Squ!re Vero Beach. Flonda Attorney for Person NOTICE Giving Noun: CREDITORS iM re FJ-LacBkBarker e edmn[roal EMailAdo,da erol awM1oe ebrar N, 0647 son, Bark. a Blow 5 15:h Avenue V„ro Beach, FL 3x960 one June 12, 1 20. June 19 February 2Ia30td� parsec art 1 ;nine 21".7.=1;V:. Nt .address of9451 n TCN2639B10 3191 066chhe, 0n1a076 NTco IT and RIVER CONtie panne! represnt- FLORIDAd'tae4ere0eaPRORATE DIVISION LorYare set larch 2014 CP010 5 46 All creditors al the STATE 01 decedent end aver IN PE II. having OSO. JEFFERSON, NOPCE OF SALE PCHAPTER 450 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN Pursuant a Final Jua m ° e Foreclosure dated May 6 d err rad in 00No. 2013 C0338 o1 the Circuit Court °f the NineteenN ludi- i 1 Circuit in and f°r Fl rid *06 Ev er8ank,tisNe %vin fl tlaantl 19C91hr[iM, etande ow Hoeowners Ar e11 100neiSh- e Clker Ower Counry Clark of the Cncuit Court l sell to the highest and best bib der for cash in/on h p' a' • Indian a 10,00AM on the 1st osrylscnieeflloduly. gdee NOTICE F SS. ALE APTER, CHAPTER 45 I OTICE ISc GIVEN hat,hnrhe2F ,al lloaurse daledPMay 21, 2O., in the hover$14 d a Cha Lleh of tns LapuU esti and .11 bidteer for cash on JYIY F. ww indian-river inalloreaos14 0, e mupw'mg ee snibe° prope,Y t J, Lees the South S feel. Rosewood Schaal g to the o6 6 P16106*6.9ae Pit Book e, Page in the Public Pe against decedent's estate on whom rvea must Hie Meir *21001 wi006 0 coup WITHIN THE LATER OF 3 MONTHS REF THE TIME OF THE FIRST PUB1115 CA- TION OF THIS NO - AFTER RVI THE DATE OF CE OF A COPY OFTHISNOTICE ON THEM All ocher creditors of 'o dece14'1 end claims or de navin9 tl<mand, else ie s[ must file nUs e t file .heir estate wtM1 WITHIN 3 M010 01 AFTER THE DATE F THE FIRST HIS'no- TION OF THIS NO- fLLECLAIMS NOT 50 ICG WITHIN TE TIME PERIODS SET FORTH IN OSECTION FTHE ]33.102 FLOHI PROBATE WILL yyI1 0 THE 5 COOS WILLBE FOR- OF M 1 11 ONTHS EVER MPR00. AFTER THE TIME OF 5.iWIIME P0915.00 THE FIRST 01* No SETTIME PERIOD TION OF T0I S SET FORTH ABOVE. D TICE OR 30 DAYS ANY CLAIM FILED SERVICE ETHE DATE OF TWO 12/ YEARSOR OFA COPY MORE or yinD AFTSR THE OF THIS NOTICE ON OECEDE DAIS THEMOF . s o BARRED. DEATH I S thedecedent ll a er rand The date of first publk ether arson navinp claims o demds ' pain. a ea.andoes estaie t file their Inims wish3 Mni, coon WITHIN ONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF THE FIRST PUBLICA- N OF THIS HISNO- CE. klL CLAIMS NOT NEN TO CREORORS Fe administration al the s . SO N,ES 0, .6.2, FFER- WON, 3i c<las ed, e ° dears pnl l], 3010, is ndidg i to Cin Riit Coral Icor v r County,. !tor oof :1 n VI e 161h Avenue, ero Beach Florida 2x60. TM1e Per onal adb 1417E17 ` alNRep rnryrenNNet ars ser anl°w, d Iseseders andilars d 0o,A 1 fier. innde 11 2121 deaeegainsn estate on whom copy of notice is requiredserved d�ma file Neir TCPALM.COM CLASSIFIED BEQUEST FOR BI eluded in this pack Te1t11ns may be a'. ted Judy60!' m me roi6mt'e r- iiees, between n. and rl 01 M. AM 0 by pwort fa, or 2v ail request than Pryer Mosquito Control 6ss Tie, NT2l Vero Be2-6 FL 32961 AXnM5?3393 772-562.9619 E-mail inner. Y Dxog Bou1:1 , Director n Pub. June 19, 26, 2014 TCN263145] NOTICE OF SALE LEGALAUCTION UCT ON 9,11DMAIDA p dFbSale 711.014 131 KM 5KYKT3Al2C6301936 Fire House Garage 800 Louisiana Ave, Sebastian,e9FL6so 32956 nazz 1 this ori ial1ne 11. 201,1. Personal Representative. Z ane Schroedee e i New Yo6rk FI Ll4.0 Na3A ;016 Attorney for Personal E -Mee 2. SIRRn Phenomena N telcro w.cam FL Bar No. 334310 Law ,rcn.6m 6,4 06, Avenue Vera Bach FL 34020 Pnone Dene 12,M3 Pub: June 12, 19, TCN2620361 Cords 21 Indian Rive unry, R°rida. Pa� e!xID: 33-3 3 P= 66aoaim-0 Pro per6y .dales,: 1]15 h Avenue, 323 Baeh. Florida 60 ANY PERSON CLAIM, ING AN INTEREST IN THE SURPLUS FROM THE SALE, IF ANY, OTHER THAN THE PRO PERT* OWNER AS OF THS OATS OF THE LIS PENDENS MUST A FILE AWRIT IN 60 DAYS AFTFR THE SALE Dal<d' May 21,3014, Wood B Boyer. PA AnOne Earn1112*6rd ha st n Noulwertl, f25,5<3.o4,Or0 end Suite 1200 1717e`Fin2a Judgment of Fore- closure LMERo W, MISTY INC TO TNF PLAT THEREOF RECORD- ED IN PIAT0006B00K 16 13, PAGES 74 AND 740, LEO THIN THE ME PWIERIODS SET Pub: June 19. 201l TCN36312Ia aHENI00 FF'S SAIF FORTH IN SECTION ]33.]03 OF THE FLOP) OA PROBATE CODE WILL BE FOW EVER BARRED HSTANDING 106 TIME TIME PERIODS NSETO CLAIFCLAIM FIL EABOVE, AO TWO 121 YEARS OR MORE AFTER THE DECEDENT'S GATE O F 40, I S IN THE CIRCUIT 86,861. COURT FORINDIANdate thfiris notice RIVED COUNTY, on 21 lnts nous iLORIDA i June, 19, 2010. NOTICE IS HEREBY PRORATE DIVISION 212012CP60501 1ESTATE OF B*LAIR B. *00005 Na ELEANOR BLAIR Deceased. TI TOTS RNOEDRCE Ofl O ALL e,1 ,r P' HAVING CGI OEMAN01 AGAR' y "At, than ,n Order on°[i- f Sum n alias bvenln�65 91 td Br' the POGEstate 21 Wesl Pilot9d Be . Fl B%AIB. EgS E L E A e O ,Telephone: BLAIR BR IG MAN, IS61166G688 ecuosDeaa, FiledNu 000587, ` :urt by thenit m ebuma®gunater. q'wer Count Fnri. am Ne add ess of which saddress: 9.001 206 lfith Avenue, Ichcoi,rintdaN9un.r. Vero Beach. Florida . than the deco- Sed, a `t1.99Secondary email dent. entetfl°ch t0. 3010' 22 ter, • Nat the Decd value 2l DeJune l9 26 TCN16.31394 NOTICE OF MEE11NG hers located an the AofIt CuBrydin9 heoin2m• e1achh FloridaylLtid196o, e, wh. time interested may be heard'with sra sed ordi- nance. Theroposed or. detl by'th bepuhlie nese p 11'111':e9ularhusi- e le.3o Oo V,nr e rl°� [ne4Tooce a B.Clerk oard of County Come i6,1°ner, lo me fid Poor al Building ir of the County Admini9- omplex, Vero v1]tn Street, Vero Beach, Flonda. bed onde 6I Ars will' need to meetingl'inrnurrwill andmane:`.eines i , w Leh in eviden Don and evidence Irs Anya vada W uf, llDisabilitiesc2[. 2!14456 )133 iib -1131 af11ea of hours in nee the mowing. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF CO 0O r 156113]1-1420 m ry email Fort Lauderdale FL 3301 19sd1533-o]Im6- 19. 521610029- simile BY IJ Gary L Mosel GARY L MASEL Fla. Btr N°.: 633 Notice 2 Pitres ns 216Bartm with Disabilities: If 216516N lathAvenue nue .yma u s e yn n Vere Beacn, Florida th a`tlisabiliry who 32960 psan yn aamro- APSOTEAESTOStme 90 At Mte. , .a.iGGathis THAT, 2014, et which time nolOea0nus.to lAI crre, of the 'M1e ill which d Decedent and 'pu Lio a'N.i`iev sons claims n..t.odeds epalDeuru the Fh a]6Oor 0. ,•,... C' NW than k whom /Property 410 15 fan fur Della/Inla,4.l,- e 1'721.,t105,171:33790 2!., t51 Part r. Pentam 6, 6 se,, 31610 56 ude,e Fl e996t We oma of spar eamPPee tion least] dayo3baler 222179,11 0600. 61P1Wt0onbema°hl your scheduled court wi M1 hie Court 1.211iaW110 m- WITHIN THE TIME 6..m<ifiately upon lre- PERIODS ET beFORTH IN SECTION` e thtnmf1 ]33.]02 OF THE fare the schedule FLORIDA PROBATE that o the n. and addresses rr been whom to bysuch ar- n suaan9e 506.., as :WRIEST FOR 010 SIle In; 01.'441,:c7 of 910 OVERVIEW Revoable Trust, Jet,, 5ealed bids will be re iver Teed by the Indian RMosquito mmr i a me a,n1at 6655 else COMMISSIONERS PETER DCNMRMAN ub: June TC'N3639996 possible for a1e will offer 01 * M )9906ienh04,' fie and interest n the amreeeid pro., as public oulcry end s utblecll 1h.11'p liens, encumbrances od II dir diene: ead be91 ti dder °r a.r. Der �cASH r hieHds`a0`he the pylied ` far es '1r is faactsaand'otion of the above described nth ]aeeaat Vero Beach, Florida, Vas 16th day e1 May, gEllt OER SHERIFF BY SERGEANT KERN LIOTTA, DEPIITV SHERIfF ANNUAL meeting. �m. June 26, Vero ..a Thearr. G°ild, 0 San Juan Ave., 3`96. Reports F le electionl m come.' bars wet. Pub. June 19, 21, 33, TC.631533 Your ultimate source for fobs, homes, wheels & stuff. Treasure Coast Classifieds CONTACT THE CIVIL PROCESS UNIT 24 HOURS PRIOR TO SALE FOIN FORMATIONgCON CEHNING THE SALE AND/OR CANCEL. TION. PK'. 1]]11 710 - Isle°. °mance wlab heNAmies Act, wit Disabilities Ac v111ira .hilt modal pa cre.d'in Inthis poo- Ua Ne Fivil Process nit I the Indian River'County Sher - I's Office not later Sher- iffs en d dct L00 0 162 Avene, ite 232, Vero m31Bea`]745 60.FL 319 60 PUBLISH DATES: 112t1yi 8 19166252530 290, June , TCN2625931 Veppeea]drance !a Iva areays; it You ALL CLAIMS ere hearing or vola NTORimpaired.d. all 711. 400* BARRE0, l,2 rmelion leanr d sui b milling bide are In Detailed r bid dite` ms Pr oval sheets. en acv in NOTICE OF MEETING NPUBLJC HMRING Find your way into cyberspace Locate your Computer System in the Treasure Coast Classifieds. tcpalm.com classified NOTICE 1 HEREBY GIVENthatthe Board of County CmmRI.? 6o s a Florida, an f • Public Hearing t consider ATHE BOA ORDC6DF gr INANR MATY OMDA- RIVER COUNTY, FNSAA"'Ion PROHIBITED HOURS OF SALE, SERVI[F ANO LON- SUMPT10N1 OF CH OLIO ]001010- 4050100104COOS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , ALLOW THE SALE, SERVICE. AND CONSUMP 560 OF ALCOHOLIC rpER ES TA- A M ID IN FOR SET JUNE ASN N PROVIDING FO SEVERABILITY CODIFICATION, ANO AN EFFE[iIVE DATE. The #1 Advertising Source For Recent Home Buyers Treasure Coast Classifieds ....corn naafi. he Public Hearing ill be held on 1ue will Julr , a 5*,r,,fi82- er es the e hoax, in the'County Commission Cham - FIND OUT ABOUT THE POWER OF ADVERTISING In Treasure Coast Classifieds tcpalm.com classified Th rs MUSIC In Classified Advertising! Find anything from pianos t0 Newnan. '77,f.7" 7,f.e t Sell no longer wanted items through A SIRED dry z Print Form INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Frank Caret.ura ADDRESS: 365B South Wimbrow Drive PHONE: 772 713 3957 SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION:Building Expansion in Fellesmere ISA PRESENTATION PLANNED? IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED? IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION? El Yes Yes Yes ❑ No No No WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOt REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? 1 m requesting the County Beard of Commissioners to consider earnestly to make a decision for an Environmental. Inpact Assessment: in Fellsmere before any massive building project starts. ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? u :'es I ® No WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? Transmitted to Administrator Via: _ Interactive Web Form )( E -Mail Fax Mail I land Delivered Phone COt'NTY ADMINISTRATOR: NIEETING DATE: c 1 Joseph A. Baird 115 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Corry Westbrook ADDRESS: 1135 3rd Avenue, Apt. 103, Vero Beach, FI 32960 PHONE: 772-539-1992 SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: IS A PRESENTATION PLANNED? IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? Oslo Boat Ramp YES YES YES Do not expand the Boat Ramp NO NO NO ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? YES NO Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form E -Mail Fax Mail Hand Delivered Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: MEETING DATE: Joseph A. Baird Document2 Board Approved 1I/7'06 116 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Wanda Scott ADDRESS: 4306 26th Avenue, Vero Beach PHONE: 772-453-3181 SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: IS A PRESENTATION PLANNED? IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? Community Affairs Discussion YES YES YES NO NO NO ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? YES NO Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form E -Mail Fax Mail Hand Delivered X Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: , MEETING DATE: Document2 Board Approved 1I/7/06 117 PUBLIC NOT ICE (INF R\I; TIONAI,) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE Stan Boling, AIC; Cjommunity Development Director FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICPP ���-• Chief, Long -Range Planning DATE: June 19, 2014 SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Items/Public Hearing for an Upcoming Board Meeting It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of July 1, 2014. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Please be advised that the following items have been scheduled for Board consideration: July 15, 2014 1. Consideration of Approval of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014. 2. Public Hearing: Roseland United Methodist Church's Request for Special Exception Use Approval to Construct a Stabilized Parking Lot to Serve the Church, located at 8205 129th Court, Roseland, FL [SP -SE -14-06-13 / 98090131-72215] (Quasi -Judicial) RECOMMENDATION: The above referenced notice is provided for the Board's information. No action is needed at this time. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River Co. Approved Date Admin. III% 7Z,Z41 Legal 1! ` ^ (4114111-V' . Budget � ��� Dept. i' (rr /`( Risk Mgr. F:\Community Development\CurDev\public hearings\BCC\2014\7-15-14 public hearing notice to board.doc 118 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO: Joseph Baird County Administrator DATE: June 25, 2014 SUBJECT: Request for Executive Sess FROM: Jason E. Brown Director, Management & B July 1, 2014 dget Staff has been collectively bargaining with the IAFF union since April 2013. Although both sides have been bargaining in good faith, an agreement has not been reached and an impasse was declared on May 30, 2014. Staff seeks to schedule an executive session (as allowed under F.S. 447.605) with the Board to discuss collective bargaining strategy. This meeting is exempt from F.S. 286.011. Members of the bargaining committee that will be present at the executive session include: Colleen Peterson, Human Resources Manager; Michael Zito, Assistant County Administrator; Jason Brown, Director, Management & Budget; John King, Emergency Services Director; Jeffrey Mandel, Attorney with Fisher & Phillips, LLP; as well as the County Administrator, Joseph A. Baird. RECOMMENDATION Establish a time certain of 10:00 a.m., July 1, 2014, for the executive session to discuss IAFF union negotiations. APPROVED AGEfNDA.JTEM: BY: II S • r' e Jose. A. Baird / County Administrator FOR: July 1, 2014 Indian River County Ap. d Administrator CA /Date a? (,// Legal 1;! C. Budget j Z r r Department Risk Management 119 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: TO: THROUGH: June 23, 2014 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Jason Brown, Director, Office of Management and Budgetq5—'-' FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manage f SUBJECT: Approval of Sealed Bid Sale of 2605 47th Avenue BACKGROUND: On August 20, 2013, the Board authorized the purchase of 2605 47th Avenue to acquire right-of-way necessary for planned widening of 26th Street, as well as the subsequent sealed bid sale of the remaining parcel, including a single family residence, once the right-of-way take was completed. In accordance with F.S. 125.35, advertisements announcing the sale appeared on May 23, 2014 and May 30, 2014. An open house was also held to enable prospective buyers to examine the house. Three sealed bids were received and publicly opened on June 19, 2014 at 2:00 P.M. in the amounts of $20,105.00, $46,200.00 and $56,051.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners ratify and accept the high bid of $56,051.00 submitted by F.W. Baker, and authorize the County Attorney's staff to prepare and execute the necessary documents to complete the sale. Funds in the amount of $85,000.00 were deducted from Optional Sales Tax 26th Street/43rd Avenue Right -of -Way account #31521441-066120-06011 to acquire the parcel, and proceeds from this sale will be returned to that account. ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Image Bid Form Real Estate Contract APPROVED AGENDA ITEM BY: \, (0,42 (� �,f)' '! dq�eph A.:aird, County Administrator % FOR•// Indian River Co Appr vl Date Admin0 0/ Legal t ( ; 1 'k. [i 2(1 Budget Department Risk Manager 120 7 H21.7 4//44--($ S , ¢'Si ) Total Bid Price Written Enclose with your bid the following: 1. A certified or cashers check in the amount of $1,000.00 as deposit in escrow, drawn on any bank authorized to do business in the State of Florida, made payable to Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. If the winning bidder fails to close within the prescribed time period the security will be retained by the County, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages. The security checks submitted by all non -winning bidders will be returned following ratification of the winning bid by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The attached Contract for Sale and Purchase (Contract). The Bidder shall fill in the following lines on the Contract: Line 2 Line 16 T inc. 7d Buyer's full legal name Purchase Price T2alanry to rincP THIS FORM HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS AND THE FLORIDA BAR v., Contract For Sale And Purchase 1' PARTIES: Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("Seiler"), 2' and tv/i 6141("Buyer"), 3 hereby agree that Seller shall sell and Buyer shall buy the following described Real Property and Personal Property (collectively "Property") 4 pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Contract for Sale and Purchase and any riders and addenda (Contract"): 5 I. DESCRIPTION: 6' (a) Legal description of the Real Property located in Indian River County, Florida: 7' Lot 1, Davilla Park Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 69, less that described 8' portion for road right-of-way in OR Book 2729, page 2144, records of Indian River Co. 9' (b) Street address, city, zip, of the Property: 2605 47th Avenue 10 (c) Personal Property includes existing range(s), refrigerator(s), dishwasher(s), ceiling fan(s), light fixture(s), and window treatment(s) unless 11 specifically excluded below. 12' Other items included are: 13' 14' Items of Personal Property (and leased items, if any) excluded are: 15' 16' I1. PURCHASE PRICE (U.S. currency). $ ;56, 05 17 PAYMENT: 18' (a) Deposit held in escrow by Indian River County (Escrow Agent) in the amount of (checks subject to clearance) $ 1,000.00 19' (b) Additional escrow deposit to be made to Escrow Agent within days after Effective Date 20' (see Paragraph HI) in the amount of $ 21' (c) Financing (see Paragraph IV) in the amount of 22' (d) Other $ 23 (e) Balance to close by cash. wire transfer or LOCALLY DRAWN cashier's or official bank check(s), subject 24' to adjustments or prorations $�5_��_�' S 25 III. TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER AND COUNTEROFFERS; EFFECTIVE DATE: 26 (a) If this offer is not executed by and delivered to all parties OR FACT OF EXECUTION communicated in writing between the parties on or 27' before 7/1/2014 , the deposit(s) will, at Buyer's option, be returned and this offer withdrawn. UNLESS OTH- 28 ERWISE STATED, THE TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE OF ANY COUNTEROFFERS SHALL BE 2 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE COUN- 29 TEROFFER IS DELIVERED. 30 (b) The date of Contract ("Effective Date") will be the date when the last one of the Buyer and Seller has signed or initialed this offer or the 31 final counteroffer. If such date is not otherwise set forth in this Contract, then the "Effective Date" shall be the date determined above for 32 acceptance of this offer or, if applicable, the final counteroffer. 33 IV. FINANCING: 34' O (a) This is a cash transaction with no contingencies for financing; 35' O (b) This Contract is contingent on Buyer obtaining approval of a loan ("Loan Approval") within days (if blank, then 30 days) after 36' Effective Date ("Loan Approval Date") for (CHECK ONLY ONE): Gil a fixed; 0 an adjustable; or 0 a fixed or adjustable rate loan, In the prin- 37' cipal amount of $ , at an initial interest rate not to exceed %, discount and origination fees not to exceed 38' % of principal amount, and for a term of years. Buyer will make application within days (it blank, then 5 days) atter 39 Effective Date. Buyer shall use reasonable diligence to: obtain Loan Approval and notify Seller in writing of Loan Approval by Loan 40 Approval Date; satisfy terms and conditions of the Loan Approval; and close the loan. Loan Approval which requires a condition related to 41 the sale of other property shall not be deemed Loan Approval for purposes of this subparagraph. Buyer shall pay all loan expenses. If Buyer 42 does not deliver written notice to Seller by Loan Approval Date stating Buyer has either obtained Loan Approval or waived this financing con - 43 tingency, then either party may cancel this Contract by delivering written notice ("Cancellation Notice") to the other, not later than seven (7) 44 days prior to Closing. Seller's Cancellation Notice must state that Buyer has three (3) days to deliver to Seller written notice waiving this 45 financing contingency. If Buyer has used due diligence and has not obtained Loan Approval before cancellation as provided above, Buyer 46 shall be refunded the deposit(s). Unless this financing contingency has been waived, this Contract shall remain subject to the satisfaction, 47 by Closing, of those conditions of Loan Approval related to the Property; 48" .] (c) Assumption of existing mortgage (see rider for terms); or 49' U (d) Purchase money note and mortgage to Seller (see Standards B and K and riders; addenda; or special clauses for terms). 50' V. TITLE EVIDENCE: At least _ days Of blank. then 5 days) before Closing a title insurance commitment with legible copies of instruments 51 listed as exceptions attached thereto ("Title Commitment") and, after Closing, an owner's policy of title insurance (see Standard A for terms) shall 52 be obtained by: 53' (CHECK ONLY ONE): U (1) Seiler, at Seller's expense and delivered to Buyer or Buyer's attorney; or 54' U (2) Buyer at Buyer's expense. 55' (CHECK HERE): U If an abstract of title is to be furnished instead of title insurance, and attach rider for terms. 56' VI. CLOSING DATE: This transaction shall be closed and the dosing documents delivered on • 7/15/2014 ("Closing"), unless 57 modified by other provisions of this Contract. If Buyer is unable to obtain Hazard, Wind, Flood, or Homeowners' insurance at a reasonable rate 58 due to extreme weather conditions, Buyer may delay Closing for up to 5 days after such coverage becomes available. 59 VII. RESTRICTIONS; EASEMENTS; LIMITATIONS: Seller shall convey marketable title subject to: comprehensive land use plans, zoning, 60 restrictions, prohibitions and other requirements imposed by governmental authority; restrictions and matters appearing on the plat or otherwise FAR/BAR-7s Rev. 7/04 0 2004 Florida Association of REALTORS' and The Florida Bar All Rights Reserved Page 1 of 4 124 61 common to the subdivision; outstanding oil, gas and mineral rights of record without right of entry; unplatted public utility easements of record 62 (located contiguous to real property lines and not more than 10 feet in width as to the rear or front lines and 7 1/2 feet in width as to the side 63 lines); taxes for year of Closing and subsequent years; and assumed mortgages and purchase money mortgages, if ary (if additional items, see 64 addendum); provided, that there exists at Closing no violation of the foregoing and none prevent use of the Property for 65* purpose(s). 66 VIII. OCCUPANCY: Seller shall deliver occupancy of Property to Buyer at time of Closing unless otherwise stated herein. If Property is intended 67 to be rented or occupied beyond Closing, the fact and terms thereof and the tenant(s) or occupants shall be disclosed pursuant to Standard F. 68 If occupancy is to be delivered before Closing, Buyer assumes all risks of loss to Property from date of occupancy, shall be responsible and liable 69 for maintenance from that date, and shall be deemed to have accepted Property in its existing condition as of time of taking occupancy. 70 IX, TYPEWRITTEN OR HANDWRITTEN PROVISIONS: Typewritten or handwritten provisions, riders and addenda shall control all printed pro - 71 visions of this Contract in conflict with them. 72* X. ASSIGNABILITY: (CHECK ONLY ONE): Buyer U may assign and thereby be released from any further liability under this Contract; I' may 73' assign but not be released from liability under this Contract; or U may not assign this Contract. 74 XI. DISCLOSURES: 75' (a) U CHECK HERE if the Property is subject to a special assessment hen imposed by a public body payable in installments which 76` continue beyond Closing and, if so, specify who shall pay amounts due after Closing: 'J Seller J Buyer U Other (see addendum). 77 (b) Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that when accumulated in a building in sufficient quantities may present health risks to per - 78 sons who are exposed to it over time. Levels of radon that exceed federal and state guidelines have been found in buildings in Florida. 79 Additional information regarding radon or radon testing may be obtained from your County Public Health unit. 80 (c) Mold is naturally occurring and may cause health risks or damage to property. If Buyer is concerned or desires additional information 81 regarding mold, Buyer should contact an appropriate professional. 82 (d) Buyer acknowledges receipt of the Florida Energy -Efficiency Rating Information Brochure required by Section 553.996, F.S. 83 (e) If the real property includes pre -1978 residential housing then a lead-based paint rider is mandatory. 84 (f) If Seller is a "foreign person" as defined by the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, the parties shall comply with that Act. 85 (g) BUYER SHOULD NOT EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT UNTIL BUYER HAS RECEIVED AND READ THE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIA- 86 TION/COMMUNITY DISCLOSURE. 87 (h) PROPERTY TAX DISCLOSURE SUMMARY: BUYER SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE SELLER'S CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES AS THE AMOUNT 88 OF PROPERTY TAXES THAT THE BUYER MAY BE OBLIGATED TO PAY IN THE YEAR SUBSEQUENT TO PURCHASE. A CHANGE OF OWNER - 89 SHIP OR PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS TRIGGERS REASSESSMENTS OF THE PROPERTY THAT COULD RESULT IN HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES. 90 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING VALUATION, CONTACT THE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE FOR INFORMATION. 91 XII. MAXIMUM REPAIR COSTS: Seller shall not be responsible for payments in excess of: 92* (a) $ for treatment and repair under Standard D (if blank, then 1.5% of the Purchase Price). 93' (b) $ for repair and replacement under Standard N not caused by Wood Destroying Organisms (if blank, then 1.5% 94 of the Purchase Price). 95' XIII. HOME WARRANTY: Li Seller U Buyer U N/A will pay for a home warranty plan issued by 96' at a cost not to exceed $ bUU.UU 97 XIV. RIDERS; ADDENDA; SPECIAL CLAUSES: CHECK those riders which are applicable AND are attached to and made part of this Contract: 98* U CONDOMINIUM U VA/FHA 0 HOMEOWNERS' ASSN. 0 LEAD-BASED PAINT 0 COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE 99* 0 INSULATION U "AS IS" 0 Other Comprehensive Rider Provisions O Addenda 100* Special Clause(s): 101" 102* 103* 104 XV. STANDARDS FOR REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS ("Standards"): Buyer and Seller acknowledge receipt of a copy of Standards A 105 through Y on the reverse side or attached, which are incorporated as part of this Contract. 106 THIS IS INTENDED TO BE A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD, 107 SEEK THE ADVICE OF AN ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING. 108 THIS FORM HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS'° AND THE FLORIDA BAR. 109 Approval does not constitute an opinion that any of the terms and conditions in this Contract should be accepted by the parties in a 110 particular transaction. Terms and conditions should be negotiated based upon the respective interests, objectives and bargaining 111 positions of all interested persons. 112 AN ASTERISK(') fOLLO ING A LINE NUMBER INNTHE �MARGIN INDICATES THE LINE CONTAINS A BLANK TO BE COMPLETED. 11 " / 114 (BUYER) h, �V . - / • F'e (DATE) (SELLER) (DATE) 115* 116 (BUYER) (DATE) (SELLER) (DATE) 117* Buyers' address for purposes of notice ��;; �y'(/ Sellers' address for purposes of notice 118' 9O/- /4/)/f-7�/(AJ,1.. /?) YE%�� & ✓ ti -i ; lL 119' (7 77) 5-7-f)5S/ Phone Phone 120 BROKERS: The brokers (including cooperating brokers, if any) named below are the only brokers entitled to compensation in connection with 121 this Contract: 122' Name: 123 Cooperating Brokers, if any Listing Broker FAR/BAR-7s Rev. 7/04 O 2004 Florida Association of REALTORS" and The Florida Bar All Rights Reserved Page 2 of 4 125 ia.E. FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME -FIRST NAME -MIDDLE NAME Davis Wesley S. MAILING ADDRESS 1801 27th Street, Building A CITY COUNTY Vero Beach Indian River DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED NAME OF BOARD. COUNCIL, COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE Board of County Commissioners THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE ISA UNIT OF: ❑ CITY WOUNTY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: 0 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY MY POSITION IS: ni ELECTIVE 0 APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative: or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. • • APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) 125 • w1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, Wesley S. Davis , hereby disclose that on J u 1 y 1 , 20 1 4 : (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or Toss of my business associate, Indian Rivcr Auctionc & App. aisals inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, inured to the special gain or loss of by whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of , which is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: July 1, 2011 Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2 Departmental Matters Indian River County Inter -Office Memorandum Office of Management and Budget TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioner FROM: Jason E. Brown Director, Office of Manage -nt & Budget DATE: June 23, 2014 SUBJECT: State Road 60 Interest Share Fee — Update on Collections and Discussion of a Termination Date for the Fee Background In 2006, the four lane segment of SR 60 from 66th Avenue to 82"d Avenue was over -capacity with respect to concurrency requirements and the SR 60 four lane segment from 82nd Ave to 1-95 was nearing capacity. In addition, no SR 60 widening improvements were funded in the first three years of the Capital Improvements Program (CIP). The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) had planned to widen State Road 60 to six lanes in the area, but construction plans were postponed indefinitely due to funding limitations. Consequently, at that time, no new development could be approved that impacted the 66th Avenue — 82"d Avenue segment of SR 60 and the same "no development approval" condition was anticipated for the 82nd Avenue —1-95 segment. At that time, the County had a number of options, including the following: • Allow a de facto moratorium on new development that impacted the deficient SR60 segment (link) and wait (timeframe unknown) until adequate funding could be secured and the CIP could be updated to put the widening in the first three years • Coordinate with FDOT and lower the LOS (Level of Service) on SR 60, allowing new development and increased congestion • Coordinate with FDOT and a large group of property owners and developers to use a proportionate share mechanism to fund SR 60 widening improvements for the 66th Avenue — 82nd Avenue segment, and update the CIP • Coordinate with FDOT to advance SR 60 widening project through local funding, and create a mechanism for recovering the County's cost to provide those funds, and update the CIP Ultimately, the last option was chosen to avoid an indefinite moratorium on development approval, maintain an acceptable LOS, and secure more immediate improvement of a critical evacuation route in a manner that fairly distributed County costs to benefitting parties. This action ensured that the project moved forward immediately, however, it resulted in the loss of a substantial amount of interest earnings on the advanced funds. In order to recover these lost interest earnings, the County adopted the SR 60 Interest Share Fee (with consultation from the Nabors, Giblin, & Nickerson law firm). F:1BudgetJason\agenda items\agenda 201314\SR 60 Interest Share Fee.doc 126 Board of County Commissioners Page 2of5 June 23, 2014 The County advanced payment to FDOT in FY 2007/08 for the widening of SR 60 from 66th Ave to 82nd Ave in the amount of $23,833,362 with a calculated interest loss of $2,294,391. Additionally, the County advanced payment to FDOT in FY 2008/09 for the construction of SR 60 from 82nd Ave to 1-95 in the amount of $14,429,794 with a calculated interest loss of $4,063,254. The County's total interest Toss for both segments was estimated at $6,357,645 on the dates the County entered into the Joint Participation Agreements with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The SR 60 Interest Share Fee for each segment was calculated by dividing the County's total estimated interest loss by the number of new trips that would be added with the widening of the roadway as illustrated below: SR 60 Widening — 66th Ave. to 82nd Ave. (A) (B) (C) total estimated interest loss T additional capacity (# of trips) = Interest Share Fee/ Trip $2,294,391 SR 60 Widening — 82nd Ave. to 1-95 566 = $4,054 (A) (B) (C) total estimated interest loss T additional capacity (# of trips) = Interest Share Fee/ Trip $4,063,254 570 = $7,129 This calculation was outlined in the technical memorandum submitted as Appendix A to the original ordinance establishing the fee. It was developed in a manner that ensured individual property owners paid a fee that was proportionate to their impact on SR 60 and were not overcharged by the County. Analysis Please see Table 1 below showing the total amount of interest share fee collections by year for the two segments: Table 1 SR 60 Interest Share Fee Collections by Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Actual Revenues 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 @ 3/31/14 $159,683 $164,464 $59,758 $44,921 $170,549 $67,058 $136,704 $67,028 Total — Inception to Date $870,165 F:\Budget\Jason\agenda items\agenda 201314\SR 60 Interest Share Fee.doc 127 Board of County Commissioners Page 3 of 5 June 23, 2014 As illustrated above, the County has collected a total of $870,165 from this fee over a period of about seven (7) years (for both segments). The interest Toss was originally estimated at $6,357,645. Therefore, the County has only collected about 14% of the interest losses projected at the inception of the process. It should be noted that the County's interest earnings on investments have dropped significantly from 2007 to the current time due primarily to the economic downturn and Federal Reserve interest rate actions. The initial fee was calculated based upon interest earnings of 4.5% per year, which was in line with the current investment rates received in 2007 when the fee was developed. Please see Table 2 below, which shows the County's average actual interest earnings on surplus funds from fiscal year 2006/07 through 2012/13. Table 2 Interest Rate by Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Average Actual Interest Rate 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 4.90% 3.83% 2.45% ............................... 1.35% 0.60% 0.49% 0.31% Staff has recalculated the fee based upon these historic rates along with future estimated interest earnings of 0.50% per year. This reduces the interest Toss on the funds to $1,882,329 after accounting for the reimbursement from the State in the amount of $959,164. Based upon the revised interest Toss, the $870,165 in revenues represents about 46% of the total cost. At current collection rates, the County would need to continue to collect the fee for many more years to fully recover the interest Toss experienced. Please see Table 3 below regarding the amount of fees collected at this time. Table 3 Percentage of Lost interest Earnings Collected Description Total Amount % of Total Lost Interest Revised Lost Interest Earnings $1,882,329 100% SR 60 Int. Share Collections 2007-2014 $870,165 46.2% Difference (Uncollected Lost Interest) $1,012,164 53.8% The relatively low revenue levels generated by the SR 60 Interest Share Fee are due primarily to two factors: 1) the relatively slow rate of development in the County following the Great Recession and 2) the conservative structure of the fee. As previously discussed, the fee was calculated by dividing the interest losses by the total number of trips added by the additional lanes of travel. It was necessary to structure F:\Budget\Jason\agenda items\agenda 201314\SR 60 Interest Share Fee.doc 128 Board of County Commissioners Page 4 of 5 June 23, 2014 the fee in this manner to ensure that individual development was not overcharged which, in turn, would result in a fee that is not legally defensible. However, it also means that inherently the County would not recover the total interest losses until new development uses all of the (566 or 570) trips that the additional lanes will accommodate. This would mean that the County would need to continue to collect this fee for many more years. At this point, staff is of the opinion that it may not be feasible to continue to collect the fee until the time that the County has been fully reimbursed for lost interest earnings. This presents the question of when the County should stop collecting the fee. In order to determine an ending date for the fee it is illustrative to consider what property owners received the main benefit of advance funding this project. The widening was advanced due in part to the concern that new development may have to be denied due to concurrency limitations on SR 60. The County's actions allowed the road widening to move forward in 2008, rather than potentially be delayed indefinitely. This delay could have resulted in development denials for traffic concurrency due to lack of capacity on SR 60. Alternatively, development could have proceeded based upon a proportionate share arrangement as outlined earlier. However, this option would have required coordination with a large group of property owners and developers along with FDOT. The resulting proportionate share fee would have been considerably higher than the SR 60 Interest Share Fee that was adopted since it would have been calculated based upon the cost to construct the projects ($38.3 million) rather than only the interest costs ($6.4 million). Therefore, the development that has been able to move forward so far has benefitted from the advance funding of the project. It is reasonable to assume that the State would not have widened this roadway until at least 2015, when the repayments to the County will be completed. While the State in 2006 was contemplating removing funding for these projects from the FDOT Work Program indefinitely, the actual current work program would have fully funded these projects by the date of the last repayment to the County, which is October 1, 2015. New development projects after that date would not experience the same level of benefit since the State may have funded the construction by this date without the County's advance funding of the project. Therefore, staff recommends that the County discontinue the SR 60 Interest Share Fee for new development effective October 1, 2015. While this will mean that the County will not fully recover the lost interest earnings, it may be preferable from a policy and fee payer equity standpoint to the option of continuing the fee indefinitely until such time as the County has recovered all lost interest. As stated above, the County's actual interest earnings declined substantially from the time that the fee was calculated. Therefore, the actual interest rates—and interest earnings lost—were less than the amount included in the fee calculation. This raises the question of whether development was overcharged. It should be noted that all such fees are based upon estimates of future costs. The actual amounts will almost always differ from these projections. As long as the assumptions were reasonable at the inception, then the fee was determined in a reasonable manner and it is not necessary to re- calculate every fee based upon actual amounts that may differ from the projections. In the case of the SR 60 Interest Share Fee, however, the reduction in interest earnings was substantial. Additionally, changes in the interest rate could have a Targe effect on the level of the fee. In light of these facts, and in an effort to ensure fairness to the fee payers it is appropriate to re -calculate the fee based upon current information. Staff has re -calculated the fee based upon: 1) actual interest earnings for fiscal years 2007/08 through 2012/13 and an assumed interest rate of 0.50% going forward, and 2) by dividing the interest Toss not by the number of trips that were added during the widening, but rather the number of trips generated by the properties that have been developed or will be developed prior to October 1, 2015 assuming growth continues at the current rate. Please see the revised calculations below for each segment: F:\Budget\Jason\agenda items\agenda 201314\SR 60 Interest Share Fee.doc 129 Board of County Commissioners Page 5 of 5 June 23, 2014 SR 60 Widening — 66th Ave. to 82nd Ave. — Revised Fee Calculation (A) (B) (C) total revised est. interest loss _ # of trips developed 06/07 — 14/15 = Interest Share Fee/ Trip $1,057,133 95.7 trips = $11,046 SR 60 Widening — 82nd Ave. to 1-95 — Revised Calculation (A) (B) (C) total revised est. interest loss _ # of trips developed 06/07 — 14/15 = Interest Share Fee/ Trip $825,197 j 96.4 trips = $8,560 The revised calculations as shown above result in higher fees than the original calculation, which confirms that the original fee did not overcharge development. Please see Table 4 below for a comparison of the original fee and the "re -calculated fee". In conclusion, the development that has occurred in the area impacted by the SR 60 Interest Share Fee paid a lower fee than would have been charged based upon the revised data. Furthermore, the SR 60 Interest Share fee was substantially less than a proportionate share fee would have been if the County had not advance funded construction of these SR 60 widening projects. Table 4 Original SR 60 Interest Share Fee Calculation vs. Re -Calculated Fee Segment Original Fee (per trip) Re -Calculated Fee (per trip) 66th Ave. to 82nd Ave. 82nd Ave. to 1-95 $4,054 $7,129 $11,046 $8,560 Recommendation Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners continue to charge the SR 60 interest share fee on new construction in the affected SR 60 area, until FDOT has completed repayment of the advance payments. Repayment is scheduled to be completed October 1, 2015, and as such, the interest share fee should be terminated at that time. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to prepare the necessary resolution and ordinance changes and submit them to the Board for final approval. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: BY: Ow // Jose p►h A. Baird /7! County Administrator FOR: July 1, 2014 F:\Budget\Jason\agenda items\agenda 201314\SR 60 Interest Share Fee.doc Indian River County Ap., d Date Administrator (o Q4,,l County Attorney ,i`7 '� y Budget A41 /4Department6AV t Risk Management 130 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator FROM: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director Ovv*--* SUBJECT: 66th Avenue (South of 61st Street to Sebastian City Limit) Corridor Study / S.C.A.L.E. Report DATE: June 24, 2014 DEPARTMENTAL — PUBLIC WORKS DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In 1995, the widening of 66th Avenue, from 2 -lanes to a 4 -lane divided roadway, was added to the Indian River County Long Range Transportation Plan. In 2005, a design contract was awarded to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for the segment of 66th Avenue from south of 61st Street to the Sebastian City limit. A public workshop was held in May 2006, which resulted in the Board of County Commissioners approving, on June 20, 2006, the following typical sections for 66th Avenue: Between 53rd Street and 77th Street Between 77th Street and north of CR 510 East/west side streets (3 -lanes wide) 156 -foot R.O.W. 160 -foot R.O.W. 80 -foot R.O.W. The 4-laning of 66th Avenue was originally intended to extend north into the City of Sebastian, where 66th Avenue becomes Schumann Drive, and to include widening the Barber Street / Schumann Drive intersection. After public meetings and presentations to the Sebastian City Council however the City decided to withdraw from the project. The County subsequently shortened the project to terminate at the Sebastian City limit south of Barber Street. In order to move forward with right-of-way acquisition and construction of 66th Avenue north of 57th Street, as well as the widening of the C.R. 510 / 66th Avenue intersection, staff has submitted the attached corridor study and S.C.A.L.E. report for Board consideration. The study evaluated five (5) factors in determining the most feasible roadway alignment. The five S.C.A.L.E. factors are as follows: • Safety • Cost • Alternative Alignments • Long Range Planning • Environmental Considerations 131 Page 2 66t Ave Corridor Study / S.C.A.L.E. Report BCC Meeting July 1, 2014 June 24, 2014 The S.C.A.L.E. report evaluated the proposed transportation improvements on 66th Avenue from south of 61st Street to the Sebastian City limit, which consists of the reconstruction of 66th Avenue from a two-lane undivided roadway to a four -lane divided roadway. The project also includes wider travel lanes, a median separator, a closed drainage system, bicycle lanes and sidewalks. The study evaluated four roadway alternatives, which are labeled as follows: • West Alignment • East Alignment • Canal Enclosure • No Build Alternative The recommended alternative is the West Alignment, which matches the alignment of the 66th Avenue segment to the south, an alignment which was recommended in the previous 66th Avenue S.C.A.L.E. report approved by the Board on March 17, 2009. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the 66th Avenue Corridor Study/ S.C.A.L.E. Report for 66th Avenue from south of 61St Street to the Sebastian City limit, along with the West Alignment alternative. ATTACHMENTS Corridor Study / S.C.A.L.E. Report: The main body of the S.C.A.L.E. report (54 pages) is attached. The remaining appendices and attachments (102 pages) are not attached however these documents are available for viewing in the County Public Works Office. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR. ul 1 2014 BY: R-2 p ,71 -95 1-cr; T/ l/. 132 Approved Date Administration b. �' fr Budget ` 24 r4 Legal i ( 14 Public Works ,2V_Ir l Engineering 132 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive Route Study 61" Street to Barber Street 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive Corridor Study From South of 61st Street to Barber Street Preparedfor. Indian River Public Works Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 601 21st Street, Suite 300 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 September, 2009 Brian Good, P.E. Date: Florida Registration No. 56939 Engineering Business No. 696 047035041 The entirety of this report, including text and images, is property of Kimley-Horn and Associates, protected under U.S. copyright law. Copyright © 2009, Ki'nrley-Horn and Associates, Inc 133 Bidder SEALED BID FORM / (Bidder's Name) Printed Hereby submits TO: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Purchasing Division 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Project: Sealed Bid for the Purchase of former Langdon property, located at: 2605 47th Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 Parcel ID #32-39-33-00002-0000.00001.0 Bid Due Date and Time: June 19, 2014 at 2:00 P.M. The undersigned declares that he/she has visited the premises to review existing conditions prior to the opening of Sealed Bids; that he/she has satisfied himself/herself relative to the condition of this property. The BIDDER proposes and agrees, if this Bid is accepted, to contract with the County for the purchase of the identified property for the amount of: 4- VI'Tv)-4-14,14 ,/i/h3-1—(s e)57 Total Bid Price Written Enclose with your bid the following: 1. A certified or cashers check in the amount of $1,000.00 as deposit in escrow, drawn on any bank authorized to do business in the State of Florida, made payable to Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. If the winning bidder fails to close within the prescribed time period the security will be retained by the County, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages. The security checks submitted by all non -winning bidders will be returned following ratification of the winning bid by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The attached Contract for Sale and Purchase (Contract). The Bidder shall fill in the following lines on the Contract: Line 2 Buyer's full legal name Line 16 Purchase Price Line 24 Balance to close Lines 113-19 Buyer's signature and address 122 Bidder shall make no changes to the Contract. Only the Contract supplied by the County in the Bid Package will be accepted. Acceptance of Bid: The BIDDER understands and agrees that the Owner reserves the right to accept or reject any or all Bids submitted and that acceptance of the winning bid will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners at the first meeting following the date of the Bid opening. Owner anticipates closing to be completed within 30 calendar days from bid opening. The undersigned hereby certifies that they have read and understand the contents of this solicitation and agree to purchase the property "AS IS, WHERE IS". Failure to have read all the provisions of this solicitation shall not be cause to alter any resulting contract. Respectfully Submitted, Name of Firm or Individual Vo/6 /j)7 /(i9/2. Address /Z 7 ,C7F r h / Jam? Authorized Signa re City, State, Zip Code (77Z) 47- 05-S1 Phone �•- Title (If applicable) oh,/ /7/ Date Signed E-mail: /6'k LLe, Li 4-( 123 I. II. IV. V. 66t1' Avenue/ Schumann Drive Route Study 6I't Street to Barber Street TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE LIST OF FIGURES ii LIST OF TABLES u EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..1 INTRODUCTION 4 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS 6 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION 6 EXISTING LAND USES 6 TYPICAL SECTION AND RIGHT-OF-WAY 10 UTILITIES 15 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 15 PRELIMINARY DESIGN ANALYSIS 16 ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTIONS EVALUATION 16 PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS 19 ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS 28 STORMWATER FACILITIES 29 ALTERNATIVE ROU 1'E ANALYSIS 29 LONG RANGE PLANNING 29 PUBLIC SAFETY 29 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 30 ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS 32 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 38 COSTS38 RECOMMENDATIONS ••• 39 LONG RANGE PLANNING 40 PUBLIC SAFETY 40 ENVIRONMENTAL 40 ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS 41 COSTS42 CONCLUSION 42 APPENDICES A IRCO ACCIDENT HISTORY DATA $ NATURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT C OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST D OPINION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION COSI' E ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT EXHIBITS Page i C❑ li Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 134 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive Route Study 61" Street to Barber Street Figure No. LIST OF FIGURES Title Page(s) FIGURE 1 STUDY LIMITS •5 FIGURE 2 CORRIDOR LAND USES ...8-9 FIGURE 3A -3E EXISTING 6611{ AVENUE TYPICAL SECTIONS ...11-13 FIGURE 4A -4C ALTERNATIVE 66111 AVENUE TYPICAL SECTIONS (61ST STREET TO 77111 STREET) .17-19 FIGURE 5 661 1 AVENUE TYPICAL SECTION (77111 STREET TO BARBER STREET) ..20 FIGURE 6A -6B SCHUMANN DRIVE TYPICAL SECTIONS ..21 FIGURE 7 61ST STREET TYPICAL URBAN SECTION 22 FIGURE 8 61ST STREET TYPICAL SUBURBAN SECTION ..23 FIGURE 9 65111 STREET TYPICAL URBAN SECTION ..23 FIGURE 10 65Tf1 STREET TYPICAL SUBURBAN SECTION .24 FIGURE 11 69111 STREET TYPICAL URBAN SECTION ..25 FIGURE 12 69TH STREET TYPICAL SUBURBAN SECTION ..25 FIGURE 13 81ST STREET TYPICAL URBAN SECTION ..26 FIGURE 14 81ST STREET TYPICAL RURAL SECTION ..26 FIGURE 15A -15B BARBER STREET TYPICAL SECTIONS ..27-28 FIGURE 16 66t1I AVENUE/ SCHUMANN DRIVE PREFERRED ALIGNMENT...44-51 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Page TABLE 1 — SEGMENTAL CORRIDOR TRAFFIC CAPACITY 15 TABLE 2 — ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS ••.28 TABLE 3 — ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT COST COMPARISON SUMMARY ..39 TABLE 4 — PREFERRED ALIGNMENT TOTAL PROJECT COST ..42 Page ii ^ Kimley-Hom C'�/ 1 and Associates, Inc. 135 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The improvements to the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor have been evaluated based on five critical factors: • long-range planning • public safety • environmental impacts • alternative alignments • cost The alternative alignments considered were those that maximize the utilization of existing roadway right-of-way, minimized impacts to the environment and resulted in minimized impacts to private property. Ten (10) alternative alignments, as well as a "No -Build" alternative, were considered. The summary and conclusions are as follows: LONG RANGE PLANNING The Indian River County MPO Long Range Transportation Plan, as well as the Indian River County Public Works Department's Capital Improvement Plan has the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor identified to be improved to a four lane divided roadway. The IRCO Concurrency Management Report indicates that within the near future, segments of the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor will no longer have capacity to support additional growth within the County while maintaining the County adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards identified within the Comprehensive Plan. While any of the alternative alignments evaluated will provide for the additional roadway capacity to meet current and future traffic demands, the "No -Build" alternative will not address the transportation needs within the County. PUBLIC SAFETY The improvements to the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor will provide for or expand facilities associated with pedestrian mobility, bicyclists and vehicular traffic. The corridor improvements will meet current safety and design standards as set forth in the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) "Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways" and Indian River County Design Standards. CmKimley-Horn om/^ 1 and Associates, Inc. 136 The selected proposed typical sections evaluated will provide separation of traffic movements, increased drive expectancy, reduced vehicular congestion and decreased accident potential; resulting in improved corridor safety. The "No -Build" alternative will not improve safety along the corridor. ENVIRONMENTAL An evaluation consisting of site characteristics, wetlands, floodplain, potential threatened and endangered species, archeological sites, soils and vegetative characteristics were reviewed within the study limits as it relates to the impact likelihood based upon the widening of the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor. None of the alignments considered are projected to result in a significantly increased or reduced environmental impact relative to one another. The "No -Build" alternative will not result in any environmental impacts along the corridor. ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS Ten (10) alternative alignments were evaluated for the 66th Avenue corridor improvement beginning 1/4 mile south of 61st Street extending northward to 1/4 mile north of Barber Street. The alternative alignments were developed to facilitate evaluating the impacts associated with each. The following impacts and/or requirements were quantified with each alignment: • Environmental Impacts • Right-of-way Requirements • Residential/ Commercial Impacts • Construction Cost • Utility Relocation Cost Based upon the alternative alignment evaluation, the following alignment combination is identified to consist of the preferred corridor: Alignment Al, Alignment B2, Alignment C and Alignment D2. CKintley-Horn .[ —7 and Associates, Inc. 137 COSTS A cost evaluation was prepared for each alternative alignment evaluated. The costs evaluated consist of the following: • Construction • Right -of -Way Acquisition • Existing Utility Relocation The following table summarizes the projected total cost associated with the Preferred Alignment. Preferred Alignment Segments Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Right -of- Way Acquisition Cost Estimated Stormwater Facility Acquisition Cost Estimated Electrical Transmission Relocation Cost Estimated Total Project Cost Total $38,729,000 $10,174,000 $1,745,000 $3,625,000 $54,273,000 The Preferred Alignment is projected to result in the most efficient utilization of the Counties capital investment. CONCLUSION Based upon the alternative alignments evaluated the Preferred Alignment for the following reasons: • Addresses the long-range planning and safety objectives set forth by the County. • Results in the least amount of private property encroachments, while maximizing utilization of existing roadway right-of-way. • Results in the least amount of impacts to other surface waters, wetland, floodplain and endangered species habitat. • Is projected to require the least amount of capital investment to achieve the goals and objectives established by the County. I'.. 3 Kimley-Han b. -11111I \ and Associates, Inc. 138 I. INTRODUCTION Based upon current traffic volumes and projected growth, the Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has identified the need to widen 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive between State Road 60 and Barber Street from the current two lane roadway section to a four lane divided section. This Corridor Study evaluates the impacts associated with the contemplated 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor improvements from south of 61st Street to north of Barber Street (approximately 4.3 miles). A separate Corridor Study prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc. for Indian River County to evaluate impacts associated with the contemplated 66th Avenue corridor improvements from south of State Road (SR) 60 to south of 61" Street was adopted by Indian River County Board of County Commissioners on March 17, 2009. The current 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive roadway configuration consists of a two lane rural section with intermittent pedestrian accommodations located along the corridor. The roadway widening will consist of improving the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor to a four lane urban section with a raised median, bike lanes and pedestrian facilities. This study will examine the alternative design routes and the "No -Build" alternative based on factors such as long-range planning, safety, environmental aspects, alignment alternatives and costs. Figure 1 delineates the study limits. 1 4 Kimley-Horn C.I \ and Associates, Inc. 139 Source: Microsoft Streets and Trips, 2004 ith St Gummcnga n. 1c f: 1c«,J . I1 .Pr 7� as rI� 0 j. I 1 - - <_> Johns Island¢ U; 5 Ic West �th SS lim a how 85th St t 7 Wabassor5 (01 SL s U1 Sf [ j t Vero Laic.? ;'__,Estates j >lh,9l - �34d SLa Fri st !.- _ tit Windsor Club Cxnd Gar Qk bj +, 'orohld Atlantic Ocean AIA IF ' Webassb RC C%•141 OW, 419 End Project Corridor 77tnSt Kr.", anis � / li: Hobart p.;v o Park Q, m 73rd St 4 a. _ fid` • �1t_ .c 715i j y - she 69th St , > ' \ ` W inti* Beach lQua6 Valley 1 j `0' I 66th St __Ir Goff Club El I, 7 snl uax 551tLt ( 6321-11-1P -� +. t Rd •t• 1 F 13131 _St Bent Pine Golf Club [r ri- J -B idi• t, 57th St 615 613 Indian River f F - Shores - )�:yr% eel co CC 619 -.-1 asth st St Begin Project Corridor 41st $tt 37th SJ ,3_Zth St 49th[_ ° l e;'! 1i1. , a, 's %st st ti.r LUQ 0 nit 2 3 • Kimley-Hom c 1 and Associates, Inc. © 2007 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 601 21St Street, Suite 300, Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone (772) 562-7981 Fax (772) 562-9689 www.kimley-horn.com STUDY LIMITS 66TH Avenue/ Schumann Drive Corridor Study Indian River County, FI SCALE: As shown PROJECT NO: 047035041 DATE: 10/2/2009 FIGURE 1 140 II. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS The following sections describe the existing conditions associated with the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive Corridor: FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION The 66th Avenue corridor between 61" Street and County Road (CR) 510 and Schumann Drive between CR 510 and Barber Street are designated as a minor arterial roadway and collector roadway, respectively within the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) Long Range Transportation Plan. EXISTING LAND USES Existing land uses located along the corridor consists of the following: mile south of 61' Street (Begin Study) to 61' Street: • Agricultural (citrus groves) exist along the west side of the corridor. • Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD) Lateral 'A' Canal is located along the east side of the corridor. • Agricultural (citrus groves) exist along the east side of the Lateral 'A' Canal. 61" Street to 65th Street: • Agricultural (citrus groves) exist along the west side of the corridor. • IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal is located along the east side of the corridor. • Agricultural (citrus groves) exist along the east side of the Lateral 'A' Canal. 65th Street to 69th Street: • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves) and single-family residential exist along the west side of the corridor. • IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal is located along the east side of the corridor. • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves) and single-family residential exist along the east side of the Lateral 'A' Canal. Kin ey-Hom and Associates, Inc. 141 69th Street to 734 Street: • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves) and single-family residential exist along the west side of the corridor. • IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal is located along the east side of the corridor. • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves) and commercial equestrian facilities exist along the east side of the Lateral 'A' Canal. 73rd Street to 77`h Street: • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves) and single-family residential exist along the west side of the corridor. • IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal is located along the east side of the corridor. • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves, ornamental nursery, horse farm and sand mine) and single-family residential exist along the east side of the Lateral 'A' Canal. 77th Street to 81 th Street: • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves), commercial (FP&L sub -station) and single-family residential exist along the west side of the corridor. • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves) and single-family residential exist along the east side of the corridor. 81' Street to County Road (CR) 510: • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves) and single-family residential exist along the west side of the corridor. • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves) and residential exist along the east side of the corridor. CR 510 to 1/4 North of Barber Street (End Study): • A mixture of agricultural (citrus groves), commercial (day care facility) and single-family residential exist along the west side of the corridor. • A mixture of multi -family residential, single-family residential and institutional (elementary school) exist along the east side of the corridor. Please refer to Figure 2 for an aerial depiction of the existing land uses located along the corridor. I. a c 17 Kimley-Han and Associates, Inc. 142 143 i 144 TYPICAL SECTION AND RIGHT—OF—WAY The 66th Avenue corridor is a rural two lane roadway with approximately 11 foot travel lanes and 2 foot paved shoulders. The existing roadway right-of-way width varies between 30 and 125 feet dependent upon the location within the corridor. Murphy Deed Reservations have been identified to exist along the western portion of the corridor between 65th Street and 77th Street. The Murphy Deed Reservations are delineated to extend between zero and 100 feet west of the existing western roadway right-of-way line dependent upon the location within the corridor. In addition to the Murphy Reservations located between 65th Street and 77th Street, a 100 foot Murphy Reservation is located in the southeast quadrant of the 66th Avenue/ 81st Street intersection. Refer to the various alignment exhibits contained within Figure 17 to Figure 18 for the location of delineated Murphy Deed Reservations located along the corridor. Posted speeds within the study limits range between 35 to 55 mph, excluding the designated school zone in the vicinity of Barber Street. The following summarizes the corridors posted speeds: 61st Street to 77th Street — 55 mph 77th Street City of Sebastian City Limit — 45 mph City of Sebastian City Limit to Barber Street — 35 mph There are limited provisions for bicyclists within the study limits and pedestrian accommodations are sparsely located within the study limits. Figure 3A through Figure 3E delineates the existing 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive typical sections within the study limits. 10 pr7min. Kimley-Horn I , and Associates, Inc. 145 MURPHY RESERVATION Figure 3A: 66``' Avenue Existing Tjpical Section — ''/4 mile south of 61 `h Street to Y4 mile north of 73r1 Street VAR. RDWY RDWY/CANAL R/W LINE RA,/ LINE 30' MURPHY RESERVATION EXIST. GRADE — 0'-80' 113' ±13' Fl n VAR. 50' or 80' SECTION LINE — IRFWCD LATERAL "A" CANAL — I 1 Figure 3B: 66th Avenue Existing Typical Section — %4 mile north of 73`hStreet to 77`h Street RCWY RDWY/CANAL R/W LINE R/W LINE SECTION LINE VAR. 1.., VAR. 50' 1_ 30'-80' 0'-30' ±13' 113' n EXISTING GRADE u 50' 50' CANAL R/W !ME CANAL R/W LINE — IRFWCD LATERAL "A" CANAL —• Kimley-Han L _3 and Associates, Inc. 146 Figure 3C: 66``' Avenue Existing 7 ypical Section — 77th Street to County Road 510 RDWY R/W LINE VAR. SECTION LINE • 25'-32' EXISTING GRADF— ±13' RD+YY R/W LINE VAR. ±I3' n u 0'-100' Figure 3D: 6e Avenue Existing Typical Section —County Road 510 to City of Sebastian City Limit RIMY R/W LINE VAR. SECTION LINE VAR. PONY R/W LINE 30'-80' EXISTING GRADE +I3' ±/3' n u 35'-50' Kimley-Han Com/ , and Associates, Inc. 147 Figure 3E: Schumann Drive Existing Typical Section —City of Sebastian City Limits to Barber Street ROWY SAN LINE 90' ROWY R/W/ SECTION LINE 2-13' ±13' n EXISTING GRADE SIDE STREET CONDITION u Within the study limits there are eight major intersections. The following are the major intersections and the current stop control condition that exists: • 61st Street — two way (east/west) • 77th Street — two way (east/west) stop control stop control • 65th Street — two way (east/west) • 81st Street — signalized control stop control • 69th Street — two way (east/west) • CR 510 — signalized control stop control • 73rd Street — two way (east/west) • Barber Street — signalized control stop control All two-way stop controlled intersections are controlled in the eastbound and westbound approaches. The following summarizes the major side street conditions in the vicinity of 66th Avenue: 61" Street: • Two lane rural unpaved road either side of the 66th Avenue corridor. • Two lane vehicular bridge immediately east of 66th Avenue over Lateral 'A' Canal. Com„ Kimley-Han and Associates, Inc. 148 • 30 foot right-of-way width adjacent to 30 foot IRFWCD Canal right-of-way. 65th Street: • Two lane rural unpaved road west of 66th Avenue. • Two lane rural unpaved road east of 66th Avenue. • Two lane vehicular bridge immediately east of 66th Avenue over Lateral 'A' Canal. • 30 foot right-of-way width adjacent to 30 foot IRFWCD Canal right-of-way. 69`h Street: • Two lane rural paved road either side of 66th Avenue. • Two lane vehicular bridge immediately east of 66th Avenue over Lateral 'A' Canal. • 30 foot roadway right-of-way adjacent to 30 foot IRFWCD Canal right-of-way. 73rd Street: • Two lane rural unpaved road either side of the 66th Avenue. • 66 inch drainage culvert immediately east of 66th Avenue within the Lateral 'A' Canal. • 30 foot right-of-way width adjacent to 30 foot IRFWCD Canal right-of-way. 77th Street: • Two lane rural unpaved road west of 66th Avenue. • Two lane rural paved section with westbound auxiliary lane east of 66th Avenue. • 90 foot right-of-way width east of 66th Avenue and 25 foot right-of-way width west of 66th Avenue. • IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal ends south of 77th Street 81' Street: • Two lane divided urban paved road with eastbound left turn auxiliary lane west of 66th Avenue. • Two lane upaved road east of 66th Avenue. • Unplatted right-of-way east of 66th Avenue and 80 foot right-of-way width west of 66th Avenue. 1 14 C1M IGniey-Horn om❑ and Associates, Inc. 149 CR 510: • Two lane rural paved road with eastbound left turn auxiliary lane west of 66th Avenue. • Two lane rural paved road with westbound left turn auxiliary lane west of 66th Avenue. • 110 foot right-of-way width east of 66th Avenue and 80 foot right-of-way width west of 66th Avenue. Barber Street: • Two lane rural paved road with eastbound left turn auxiliary lane west of Schumann Drive. • Two lane rural paved road with westbound left turn auxiliary lane west of Schumann Drive. • 80 foot right-of-way width. UTILITIES The following utility providers have indicated that they have existing facilities located within the corridor's study limits: • Florida Power & Light — transmission and distribution service facilities primarily located along the corridor's west right-of-way • Comcast Cable — buried and overhead services located along the corridor. • Bellsouth Telephone - buried duct bank facilities located along the corridor. • Indian River County Utility Department — maintains force main and potable water main services located within the corridor. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Based upon the existing operating capacities and the IRCO 2008 annual traffic volume counts, the following table summarizes the operating capacities and the percentage of operating capacity. Table 1: Segmental Corridor Traffic Capacity Link No.Roadway From Street To Street Peak CaPaurty Exist. 2008 Vol. Vested Trips Total Trips % of Capacity 3150N 66th Avenue 41" St. 65th St. 870 678 71 749 86 3150S 66th Avenue 41" St. 65th St. 870 376 55 431 50 1 15 C/1 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 150 3160N 66th Avenue 65th St. 69th St. 870 681 44 725 83 3160S 66th Avenue 65th St. 69th St. 870 350 42 392 45 3170N 66th Avenue 69th St. CR 510 870 723 60 783 90 3170S 66th Avenue 69th St. CR 510 870 360 50 410 47 S. Seb. 1510N 66th Avenue CR 510 City 870 853 9 862 99 Limits S. Seb. 1510S 66th Avenue CR 510 city, Limits 870 477 14 491 56 The 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor has been reviewed and projected to fail IRCO Level of Service (LOS) standards identified within the Comprehensive Plan within six (6) years based upon a 2.5% annual growth rate and current geometric roadway conditions. III. PRELIMINARY DESIGN ANALYSIS The Indian River County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has identified the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor between 61st Street and Barber Street as a potentially deficient corridor within the 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). As such, the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor has been identified within the MPO's 2030 Needs Plan Projects to be widened from 2 -lane undivided to 4 -lane divided to meet the transportation needs identified within the County. ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTIONS EVALUATION During preliminary design evaluations, three 66th Avenue alternative typical sections were developed and evaluated between 61st Street and 77th Street (2 miles), as these are the limits of the IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal within the study limits. The three alternative typical sections evaluated consisted of a 156 foot, 142 foot and 134 foot roadway rights-of-way. The three alternative sections were developed in conjunction with Indian River County (IRCO) and IRFWCD staff. All three typical sections consisted of a four lane divided urban roadway located west of the IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal. As additional right-of-way will be required to expand 66th Avenue, the alternative sections were developed consistent with IRCO LDR Section 952.08(1)(b) which states the following: i i• 16 CI1Kinley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 151 "Where a drainage district canal right-of-way, a railroad right-of-way, a high voltage power line, or similar impediment abuts one (1) side of a deficient road right-of-way, the entire right-of-way deficiency shall be made up from the property on the opposite side unless an alternative design (e.g. culverting the canal) is approved by the public works director" The three alternative typical sections all share the following elements: • Two 12 -foot wide travel lanes in each direction • 4 -foot wide paved outside shoulders • 43 -foot wide raised median • 8 -foot concrete sidewalk with 5 -foot utility strip located along west side of the corridor. Alternative Typical Section 1 (156 foot Right -of -Way) is proposed to be located no closer than 38 feet between the western Lateral 'A' Canal top of bank to the eastern 66th Avenue curb line. This separation distance provides sufficient distance for IRFWCD personnel to perform maintenance activities along the western edge of the Lateral 'A' Canal and does not require installation of guardrail along the roadway corridors eastern edge to meet roadside safe "clear zone" distance from the canal. Figure 4A depicts the Alternative Typical Section 1. Figure 4A: 66th Avenue Alternative Typical Section 1 Alternative Typical Section 2 (142 foot Right -of -Way) is proposed to be located no closer than 25 feet between the western Lateral 'A' Canal top of I.��.,. X17 Ci11111/1 Kimley-Hom L , and Associates, Inc. 152 bank to the eastern 66rh Avenue curb line. This separation distance provides adequate distance for IRFWCD personnel to perform maintenance activities along the western edge of the Lateral 'A' Canal. A guardrail barrier will be required to be installed along the roadway corridors eastern edge to meet roadside safe "clear zone" distance from the canal. Figure 4B depicts the Alternative Typical Section 2. Figure 4B: 66th Avenue Alternative Typical Section 2 Alternative Typical Section 3 (134 foot Right -of -Way) is proposed to be located no closer than 17 feet between the western Lateral 'A' Canal top of bank to the eastern 66th Avenue curb line. This separation distance does not provide adequate distance for IRFWCD personnel to perform maintenance activities along the western edge of the Lateral 'A' Canal and will require clearing of existing vegetation and construction of a stabilized work platform along the Lateral 'A' Canal eastern edge. A guardrail barrier will be required to be installed along the eastern edge of the roadway corridor to meet roadside safe "clear zone" distance from the canal. Figure 4C depicts the Alternative Typical Section 3. Kinsey -Horn 1 18 �� and Associates, Inc. 153 Figure 4C: 66th Avenue Alternative Typical Section 3 PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS 66th Avenue - South of 61" Street to 77th Street On June 13, 2006, Indian River County staff presented the 66Th Avenue alternative typical sections between 61" Street and 77th Street to the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. At the public meeting, the Board selected to implement Alternative Typical Section 1 for the 66th Avenue improvements between 61st Street and 77th Street. 66Th Avenue - 77th Street to South of Barber Street The 66th Avenue typical section from 77th Street to approximately 1/2 mile south of Barber Street is proposed to be a 160 foot right-of-way width. The typical section is proposed to be modified north of 77th Street as this is the northern limit of the IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal. The typical section consists of the following elements: • Two 12 -foot wide travel lanes in each direction • 4 -foot wide paved outside shoulders • 43 -foot wide raised median • 8 -foot (south of CR 510) or 5 -foot (north of CR 510) concrete sidewalk with 5 -foot utility strip located along west side of the corridor. • 5 -foot concrete sidewalk with 5 -foot utility strip located along the east side of the corridor. I 119 Cmo^ KinAey-Horn om/ 1 and Associates, Inc. 154 Figure 5 — 66th Avenue Typical Section - 77th Street to South o f Barber Street Schumann Drive — Barber Street Intersection Schumann Drive in the vicinity of Barber Street, transitions from the 4 -lane divided section previously described to the existing 2 -lane rural roadway geometry located north of Barber Street. The intersection of Schumann Drive and Barber Street will be improved to provide for dual northbound left turn auxiliary lanes with associated receiving lanes, two receiving lanes in the southbound direction and dedicated right turn auxiliary lanes on all approaches, in addition to the dedicated left turn auxiliary lane and through lane on each approach. As a result of this geometric transition, the proposed right-of-way required to support the proposed intersection improvements is delineated to be 120 feet south of Barber Street and 110 feet north of Barber Street. The following two sections delineate the proposed Schumann Drive typical sections immediately north and south of Barber Street: 1HA; 20 Kinney -Horn C=I \ and Associates, Inc. 155 R.O.W. Figure 6A — Schumann Drive Typical Section — South o_ f Barber Street to Barber Street Intersection 120' R.O.W. R.C.W. 4' 10' SOD 5' SOD • • 4 f[ /,/ /c IL /c /L J ,L 1 1 / 4) 441 t ro' PGP 0.02 -PGP 0.02 _ 0.02 0.02 10' 4' SOD SOD 5' Figure 6B — Schumann Drive Typical Section - Barber Street Intersection to North of Barber Street 3' R.O.W. 110' R.O.W. R.O.W. 50D 12' 50D 7' 5' :I 6:1 6:I /Z /c - /c is .. 4) / 4 f PGP 0.02 0.02 \_\ 12' 5' SOD 5 7' 0.02 6.1 SIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS The following summarizes the scope of improvements and the typical sections associated with the proposed side street improvements: 3' SOD 1 21 Kimley-Horn C=I1 and Associates, Inc. 156 61" Street: To accommodate the vehicular, pedestrian and stormwater improvements along 61st Street, the corridor is proposed to be widened from its current 30 foot right-of-way width to 80 feet in total width. The additional required right-of-way is proposed to be acquired from the north side of the corridor consistent with IRCO LDR Section 952.08(1)(b). The side street will be improved to provide eastbound and westbound left turn auxiliary lanes. Within the limits of the auxiliary lane queue and transition length the roadway is proposed to be an urban roadway section as depicted in Figure 7. In addition to the auxiliary lane improvements the existing vehicular bridge immediately east of the 66th Avenue corridor is proposed to be replaced. The intersection of 61St Street and 66th Avenue is proposed to remain two-way stop controlled in the east and westbound directions. R.O.W. !0' T.C.E. 50D 2 6%t Figure 7 — 61st Street Typical Urban Section 80' R.O.W. R.O.W. R.O.W. 30' 1RFWCD R.O.W. 5' SWK 11' 2 4' SOD 12" _ 12' *PGP-. 0.02 VAR. 41 12' VAR. 2' SOD (4'-8') 1fl AI N1Al NI 4 VAR. 0.02 —EXIST. SUB—LATERAL TOP OF BANK __' Beyond the auxiliary lane improvements and within the roadway transition to the existing roadway corridor, the typical section is proposed to be a suburban section to facilitate roadway drainage while providing safety improvements adjacent to the IRFWCD sub -lateral canal. Figure 8 depicts the suburban section. 22 Kindey-Horn l , and Associates, Inc. 157 Figure 8 — 61st Street Typical Suburban Section R.O.V/. 2' SOD 80R.O.VI. R.O.W. R.O.W. 30' IRFNCD R.G.W. SWKI 4' PAVED SHLDR 50D VAR. 8' SHLDR —2, O.0c�j� _G-06 VAR. 0-12' 12' _4' 2' 14' MIN. 411 VAR. , ' VAR_ SOD a G.02 —EXIST. SUB -LATERAL TOP OF BANK 6r Street: To accommodate the vehicular, pedestrian and stormwater improvements along 65th Street, the corridor is proposed to be widened from its current 30 foot right-of-way width to 80 feet in total width. The additional required right-of-way is proposed to be acquired from the north side of the corridor consistent with IRCO LDR Section 952.08(1)(b). The side street will be improved to provide eastbound and westbound left turn auxiliary lanes. Within the limits of the auxiliary lane queue and transition length the roadway is proposed to be an urban roadway section as depicted in Figure 9. In addition to the auxiliary lane improvements the existing vehicular bridge immediately east of the 66th Avenue corridor is proposed to be replaced. The intersection of 65th Street and 66th Avenue is proposed to remain two-way stop controlled in the east and westbound directions. Figure 9 — 65th Street Typical Urban Section R.O.W. 10' T.C.E. 80' R.O.W. SOD 2' 5' SWK 1/' SOD /2' 12' R.O.W. 30' IRFWCD R.O.W. R.O.W. /2' *PGP - 0.02 144111 VAR. VAR. VAR. 2 SOD f4'-87 10' MIN. 0.02 — EXIST. SUB -LATERAL TOP OF BANK I23 Kmley-Horn C MIT and Associates, Inc. 1 158 R.D.W. 2' SOD Beyond the auxiliary lane improvements and within the roadway transition to the existing roadway corridor, the typical section is proposed to be a suburban section to facilitate roadway drainage while providing safety improvements adjacent to the IRFWCD sub -lateral canal. Figure 10 depicts the suburban section. Figure 10 — 65th Street Typical Suburban Section R.G.W. 80' R.O.W. 30IRFWCD R.O.W. R.D.W. SWKI 4' PAVED SHLDR -- SOD VAR. 8' VAR. 12' 4' SHLDR 0.0 2' ./ 6;t Q.06 VAR. 0-12 -PGP VAR. l4' MIN. SOD 0.02 — EXIST. SUB—LATERAL TOP OF BANK 69`h Street: To accommodate the vehicular, pedestrian and stormwater improvements along 69th Street, the corridor is proposed to be widened from its current 30 foot right-of-way width to 100 feet in total width. The proposed 100 foot right-of-way width is consistent with LDR Section 952.08 designation for this thoroughfare road ultimate right-of-way width and consistent with portion of the existing right-of-way widths located along the corridor. The additional required right-of-way is proposed to be acquired from the north side of the corridor consistent with IRCO LDR Section 952.08(1)(b). The side street will be improved to provide eastbound and westbound left turn auxiliary lanes. Within the limits of the auxiliary lane queue and transition length the roadway is proposed to be an urban roadway section as depicted in Figure 11. In addition to the auxiliary lane improvements the existing vehicular bridge immediately east of the 66th Avenue corridor is proposed to be replaced with a bridge -culvert and a traffic signal is proposed to be installed at the intersection with 66th Avenue. 1 24 Kindey-Horn 111.-11=I1 and Associates, Inc. 159 R.O.W. Figure 11 — 69th Street Typical Urban Section r00 R.O.W. R.O.W. R.G.W. 30' IRFWCO R.O.W. /2' 5' VAR. SWK 2' SOD 0.02 R.O.W. S0/) v 2 4' 12' /2' 12' VAR. 2 4 PGP 441 - .02 VAR. VAR. 50D 10' ANN. 0.02 Beyond the auxiliary lane improvements and within the roadway transition to the existing roadway corridor, the typical section is proposed to be a suburban section to facilitate roadway drainage while providing safety improvements adjacent to the IRFWCD sub -lateral canal. Figure 12 depicts the suburban section. Figure 12 — 69th Street Typical Suburban Section 100' R.O.W R.O.W. R.O.W. 30' IRFWCD R.O.W. 12' 5 VAR. 2' 50D SWK 0.02 4' PAVED SNLDR SOD 8' SNLDR 12' VAR. 12' 4' 2 Q-06 a VAR. 0-12' yh VAR. f 14' /11N. 50D 0.02 73rd Street: No improvements are proposed to be constructed along this side street. 77th Street: No improvements are proposed to be constructed along this side street. 81' Street: To accommodate the vehicular, pedestrian and stormwater improvements along 81st Street, the corridor is proposed to be established within an 80 foot total width. Currently, the unpaved two lane corridor resides within a 25 M.11111111 Kimley-Han and Associates, Inc. 160 R.O.W. undesignated right-of-way. The side street will be improved to provide a westbound left turn auxiliary lane. Within the limits of the auxiliary lane queue and transition length the roadway is proposed to be an urban roadway section as depicted in Figure 13. In addition to the auxiliary lane improvement, a mast arm supported traffic signal is proposed to be installed at the intersection with 66th Avenue. Figure 13 — 81' Street Typical Urban Section 80' R/W R.O.W. 6' 5' 500 2' s' 2' 2 16' 0.02 12' 16' VAR. PGP VAR. t 2 Alir 5' 5' 6' SOD 0.02 SOD SECTION LINE 100' R(W MURPHY RESERVATION Beyond the auxiliary lane improvements and within the roadway transition to the existing roadway corridor, the typical section is proposed to be a rural section as depicted in Figure 14. Figure 14 — 81' Street Typical Rural Section R.O.W. 80' R/W R.O.W. 100' HrW MURPHY RESERVATION X26 Kanley-Horn 1..i111111 1 and Associates, Inc. 161 CR 510: In conjunction with the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor improvement, the County is widening CR 510. Refer to the CR 510 Route Study prepared by Stanley Consultants for a discussion of improvements and impacts associated with the CR 510 corridor. Barber Street: To accommodate the vehicular, pedestrian and stormwater improvements along Barber Street, the corridor is proposed to be widened from its current 80 foot right-of-way width to 115 feet west of Schumann Drive and 100 feet east of Schumann Drive. Barber Street is proposed to be improved to provide an eastbound and westbound right turn auxiliary lanes and adding an additional westbound receiving lane to accommodate auxiliary lane improvements on Schumann Drive, in addition a mast arm supported traffic signal is proposed to be installed. Figure 15A and 15B depict the proposed Barber Street typical sections. Figure 15A — Barber Street Typical Section — Eastbound Approach P.O.W. R.O.W. 115' R.O.W. 2' (MIN.) SOD 5' 8' 8' SWK1 SHLDR 4' PAVED SHLDR SOD VAR. 12'-14' VAR. I2'-14' 12' 12' 12' 8' SHLDR 4' PAVED — SHLDR SOD ac _a+0.02 g/6:1 o.06. 0.02 6V 4:10.02 1 27 C11•1^ IGmley-Horn SI \ and Associates, Inc. 2' (MIN.) SOD ri _ 162 Figure 15B — Barber Street Typical Section — Westbound Approach R.O.W. 2' (WN.) SOD R.O.W. 100R.O.W 5' swk 8' SHLDR 4' fAVEO SHLDR SOD /2' /2' /2' :10.021/6:1 0.06 l 0.02 4 POP 12' 8' 8' SHLDR r 0.02 5' SWK 4' PAVED SHLDR SOD 0.06 ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS 6/ 4:12.02 Ty -- 2' (MIN.) SOD The proposed roadway improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the criteria, guidelines and provisions established by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Plans Preparation Manual (PPM), FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways (Florida Greenbook) and the IRCO Land Development Code. Table 2 summarizes the design criteria utilized in developing the proposed typical sections and alternative alignments evaluated: Table 2: Roadway Design Standards Design Element Standards Reference Design Speed (DS) 45 mph 40 mph (w/in City of Sebastian) IRCO Design Vehicle WB -50 P (U-turn Vehicles) IRCO Lane Widths 12 feet IRCO Median Width 22 feet min. Florida Greenbook Minimum Gutter Grade 0.3% Florida Greenbook Canal Hazard Mitigation Clear zone FDOT PPM (66'" Avenue) or Florida Greenbook (Side Streets) Minimum Clear Zone 4' from face of curb (urban) or 18' from edge of travel (rural) Florida Greenbook Max. Horiz. Deflection 1 Degree Florida Greenbook Max. Through Lane Deflection at Intersections 3 Degrees (45mph DS) 5 Degrees (40 mph DS) FDOT PPM Min. Horiz. Curve Length 400 ft Florida Greenbook 1 28 C" �^ Kmley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 163 STORMWATER FACILITIES Drainage collection and conveyance is intended to be provided via closed stormwater conveyance system. The system will convey runoff to one of nine stormwater management facilities proposed to be located along the corridor. Due to the seasonal high water table elevation projected in close proximity to existing grade, wet detention stormwater facilities are proposed as the stormwater Best Management Practice (BMP). The proposed stormwater facilities must meet St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), Sebastian River Improvement District (SRID) and Indian River County drainage design criteria. The proposed stormwater facility sites located along 66th Avenue have been located based upon their respective drainage basin limits, minimizing impacts to property located along the corridor, minimizing construction cost and avoiding potential environmental impacts. Refer to Figure 23 for the proposed stormwater facility locations located along the corridor. IV. ALTERNATIVE ROUTE ANALYSIS LONG RANGE PLANNING The need to widen the 66th Avenue corridor has been identified within the IRCO Metropolitan Planning Organizations 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan. The widening of the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor, within the study limits, is also identified within the IRCO 2020 Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvement Element. PUBLIC SAFETY Between January 1, 2005 and June 22, 2008 there were 69 reported accidents within the study limits. The majority of these accidents consisted of rear end collision (27.5%), right angle collision (20.2%) and left turn collision (10.1%). The construction of additional through lanes and additional auxiliary lanes located at the major intersections is expected to result in a reduction in these three types of accidents. Refer to Appendix A for additional information relating to the corridors accident history. 29 Kenley -Horn C / 1 and Associates, Inc. 164 The implementation of the selected corridor typical sections will provide an improved safety benefit to motorist, pedestrians and bicyclists. The introduction of a median divided corridor reduces headlight glare, provides a refuge for motorists and pedestrians during crossing movements, provides improved access management by limiting and controlling vehicular turning movements and, most importantly, increases the separation distance between opposing traffic movements. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A Natural Resource Assessment potential impacts associated with Schumann Drive corridor. The potential development constraints • Site Characteristics • Soils • Floodplain • Vegetative Characteristics • Historic and Archaeological Resources (NRA) has been conducted to evaluate constructing the improved 66'h Avenue/ NRA evaluation considers and identifies consisting of the following: • Wetland and Other Surface Waters • Wildlife • Endangered, Threatened and Species Formal listed species surveys were not included as part of the scope of work for this project. However, observations of listed species or listed species habitat were documented and recommendations for additional surveys, if required, are made in the NRA. Wetlands were not delineated as part of the scope of work for this project, however the approximate location of the wetlands and surface waters are discussed in the NRA. Vegetative communities were classified according to the Florida Land Use, Cover, and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS, Florida Department Of Transportation, 1999). Impacts to surface waters and wetlands will require an environmental resource permit (ERP) from St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and a Section 404 permit from US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Mitigation may be required as a condition of the ERP for impacts to wedands. Potential isolated wetland impacts are anticipated in the vicinity of the 66th Avenue/ 77th Street intersection as a 30 IGmley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 165 result of filling a potentially man made water body and south of Barber Street along the corridors east side. Minimal other surface water impacts are anticipated with filling of roadside swales and water control district canals due to drainage culvert extensions. KHA staff reviewed existing available information to determine a list of species that may occur within or in the vicinity of the project area. The following discusses species that have a high probability of occurrence or have been observed along the corridor: • Wood storks generally nest in areas of inundated forested wetlands (cypress, hardwood forests, sloughs, swamps, and mangroves) and occasionally in artificial habitats of dredged areas or impoundments vegetated with native or exotic vegetation. They typically forage in freshwater marshes, flooded pastures, tidal creeks, ponds, and lagoons or other aquatic habitats where water levels are cyclical. Wood storks were observed along the canal banks during field reconnaissance. A review of the FWC wading bird colony database revealed documented wood stork colonies within the 18.6 mile core foraging area (CFA). Wood storks are not expected to nest within the project corridor; however, they may potentially forage in the canals and ditches adjacent to the corridor and the wetlands within the vicinity of the project. Impacts to the wood stork will have to be assessed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) via a section 7 USACE dredge and fill permit and any mitigation proposed will need to consider wood stork habitat. There is potential for the proposed stormwater ponds to offset wood stork habitat impacts. • Florida scrub jays inhabit fire dominated, low -growing, oak scrub habitats throughout the state. FNAI documented colonies in the vicinity of the project corridor. During field reconnaissance, a scrub jay family was verified occurring adjacent to the project corridor south of Barber Street. • Several active Gopher Tortoise burrows were observed along 66th Avenue north of CR 510. A formal survey is recommended to locate all the burrows within the proposed right-of-way. Currently, there are several options to mitigate for impacts to gopher tortoises and 1 31 Kimley-Horn C1M and Associates, Inc. 166 these include: Incidental Take which involves paying into a conservation fund based on the density of tortoises on-site and the amount of habitat impacted; relocation of individual gopher tortoise on-site or off-site; and avoidance. No permit is necessary if burrows can be avoided and a 25-50 foot buffer between the burrow and proposed development is provided. Information on historical and archaeological resources in the subject site vicinity was requested from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Division of Historical Resources Florida Master Site File Review. According to a SHPO review conducted on December 20, 2006, one previously recorded archaeological site and several standing structures are documented in the immediate vicinity of the project corridor. A majority of these resources consist of residences along CR 510. A compliance review from SHPO is required as part of the ERP permitting process. SHPO will determine if archaeological surveys or further action is necessary during the compliance review. Refer to Appendix B for additional information and supporting documentation relative to the NRA Technical Memorandum. ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS Several alternative alignments were evaluated in conjunction with widening the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor to determine and quantify impacts associated with each. Alternative alignments along the corridor were evaluated to determine impacts to natural features (drainage canals, wetlands, etc.), private property (improved and unimproved) and projected construction costs. Due to varying physical and environmental conditions located along the corridor, the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor has been subdivided into four (4) segments to facilitate the development and comparison of alternative alignments within each identified segment. The following describes the four (4) segments: Segment A — 61st Street to 73rd Street Segment B — 73rd Street to 81st Street Segment C — 81st Street to City of Sebastian City Limit 1 32 IGmley-Horn \ANT and Associates, Inc. 167 Segment D — City of Sebastian City Limit to Barber Street Within each segment, alternative alignments were evaluated to determine their corresponding impacts. The following describes the alternative alignments evaluated and their corresponding impacts: Segment A Alternative Alignments Alignment Al - 61st Street to 73rd Street (West Alignment). Alignment Al projects the approved 66th Avenue typical sections to expand the corridor west of the existing IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal right-of-way, consistent with IRCO LDR Section 952.08(1)(b). This alignment delineates acquisition of an additional 126 feet along the existing roadway corridor to provide the total right-of-way width of 156 feet. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 16 parcels and is projected to require relocation of 7 residential properties. Refer to Exhibit 1 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment Alignment A2 — 61st Street to 73rd Street (East Alignment) Alignment A2 was developed as an alternative to Alignment Al and Alignment A3. Alignment A2 projects the approved 66th Avenue typical sections to expand the corridor east of the existing IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal right-of-way. This alignment delineates acquisition of an additional 156 feet along the eastern edge of the IRFWCD canal right-of-way. To accommodate this alignment a bridge will be required to be constructed over the Lateral 'A' Canal to move the alignment from the west side of the Lateral 'A' Canal to the east side south of 61st Street. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 10 parcels and is projected to impact 2 improved properties. Refer to Exhibit 2 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment. Alignment A3 — 61st Street to 73rd Street (Canal Enclosure) Alignment A3 was developed as an alternative to Alignment Al and Alignment A2. To minimize right-of-way acquisition and impacts to improved property located along the corridor, Alignment A3 projects the 66th Avenue typical sections to transition the 66th Avenue corridor from .. X33 IGrnley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 168 expanding the corridor west of the existing IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal right- of-way south of 61" Street to enclosing the Lateral 'A' Canal right-of-way such that an improved 66th Avenue corridor may be constructed within the existing roadway and canal right-of-way. To accommodate this alignment a bridge -culvert will be required to be constructed within the Lateral 'A' Canal from south of 61" Street to 73rd Street. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 1 parcel. Refer to Exhibit 3 within Appendix E for an alignment depiction. Segment B Alternative Alignments Alignment B1 - 73rd Street to 81St Street Alignment (West Alignment No. 1) Alignment B1 is a continuation northward of Alignment Al along the west side of the Lateral 'A' Canal. The corridor maintains the proposed corridor bearing north of 77th Street where it then transitions to the east to avoid impacts to the existing FP&L sub -station located in the southwest quadrant of the 66th Avenue/ 81" Street intersection and minimizes impacts to private property along the corridor. FP&L operates electrical transmission and distribution facilities along the west side of the corridor between 77th Street and 81" Street. These facilities will be required to be relocated to facilitate the proposed typical section. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 16 parcels and is projected to require relocation of 3 residential properties. Refer to Exhibit 4 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment. Alignment B2 - 73rd Street to 81" Street Alignment (West Alignment No. 2) Alignment B2 was developed as an alternative to Alignment BI, Alignment B3 and Alignment B4. Alignment B2 is a continuation northward of Alignment Al along the west side of the Lateral 'A' Canal. The corridor maintains the proposed corridor bearing north of 73rd Street where it then transitions to the east via reverse horizontal curves to avoid impacts to existing single-family structures located along the west side of the proposed corridor south of 77th Street. To accommodate this alignment a segment of the most upstream Lateral 'A' Canal headwaters will be required to be enclosed. This alignment introduces 34 Kimley-Horn C. and Associates, Inc. 169 a slight intersection skew with 77'h Street, but is within acceptable design standards and has been reviewed and accepted by IRCO Public Works Department. The corridor re-establishes the proposed bearing north of 77th Street, as depicted with Alignment B1, where it then transitions to the east to avoid impacts to the existing FP&L sub -station located in the southwest quadrant of the 66th Avenue/ 81st Street intersection and minimizes impacts to private property along the corridor. FP&L operates electrical transmission and distribution facilities along the west side of the corridor between 77th Street and 81" Street. These facilities will be required to be relocated to facilitate the proposed typical sections. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 18 parcels and is projected to require relocation of 2 residential properties. Refer to Exhibit 5 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment. Alignment B3 - 73rd Street to 81" Street Alignment (East Alignment) Alignment B3 was developed as an alternative to Alignment B1, Alignment B2 and Alignment B4. Alignment B3 is a continuation northward of Alignment A2 along the east side of the Lateral 'A' Canal. This alignment delineates acquisition of an additional 156 feet along the eastern edge of the IRFWCD canal right-of-way. To accommodate this alignment the sublateral canal immediately south of 77th Street will need to be enclosed for a distance of approximately 175 feet to accommodate the new intersection location of 66th Avenue and 77th Street. The corridor transitions to the west immediately north of 77th Street to maximize utilization of the existing available roadway right-of-way. The necessary 66th Avenue right-of-way between 77th Street and 81st Street is depicted to be acquired along the east side of the existing corridor to avoid impacts to the existing FP&L sub -station located in the southwest quadrant of the 66th Avenue/ 81St Street intersection. FP&L operates electrical transmission and distribution facilities along the west side of the corridor between 77th Street and 81" Street. These facilities will be required to be relocated to facilitate the proposed typical section. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 15 parcels and is projected to require relocation of 6 residential properties. Refer to Exhibit 6 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment. 1 35 EMIFI Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 170 Alignment B4 - 73rd Street to 81st Street Alignment (Canal Enclosure) Alignment B4 was developed as an alternative to Alignment B1, Alignment B2 and Alignment B3. Alignment B4 is a continuation northward of Alignment A3 (Canal Enclosure). To accommodate this alignment the IRFWCD Lateral 'A' Canal will be required to be enclosed with a bridge - culvert between 73rd Street and 77th Street, consistent with the Alignment A3 enclosure requirements. North of 77th Street the alignment transitions to maximize utilization of existing roadway right-of-way while minimizing impacts to improved property. The necessary 66th Avenue right-of-way between 77th Street and 81st Street is depicted to be acquired along the east side of the existing corridor to avoid impacts to the existing FP&L sub -station located in the southwest quadrant of the 66th Avenue/ 81" Street intersection. FP&L operates electrical transmission and distribution facilities along the west side of the corridor between 77th Street and 81st Street. These facilities will be required to be relocated to facilitate the proposed typical section. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 14 parcels and is projected to require relocation of 5 residential properties. Refer to Exhibit 7 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment. Segment CAlternative Alignment Alignment C — 81st Street to City of Sebastian City Limit A single alignment was developed within these limits as much of the corridor is currently being utilized for agricultural purposes or undeveloped. The alignment was developed to minimize impacts to the single-family residential property located along the west side of the corridor between 81st Street and CR 510. The proposed corridor transitions to the west of the existing corridor, south of CR 510, to maintain a consistent bearing through the CR 510 intersection while avoiding impacts to the several single-family residential properties located along the east side of the corridor north of CR 510. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 11 parcels and is projected to require relocation of 0 residential properties. Refer to Exhibit 8 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment. P.. X36 Kimley-Horn CSI 1 and Associates, Inc. 171 likelihood based upon the widening of the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor. Identified impacts associated with the various alignments evaluated consists of filling of other surface waters associated with enclosing or filling roadside swales or canals, filling of isolated wetlands located immediately adjacent to the corridor, potential decrease of wood stork habitat as a result of filling roadside swales and canals, potential decrease of scrub jay habitat immediately adjacent to the corridor and potential decrease of gopher tortoise habitat located immediately adjacent to the corridor. None of the alignments considered are projected to result in a significantly increased or reduced environmental impact relative to one another. The "No -Build" alternative will not result in any environmental impacts along the corridor. ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS The following alignment combination is identified to consist of the preferred corridor: Alignment Al, Alignment B2, Alignment C and Alignment D2. SegmentA Preferred Alignment - Alignment Al is recommended as the preferred alignment between 61St Street and 73rd Street, as compared to Alignment A2 and Alignment A3, as it results in the least amount of environmental impacts, projected lower construction cost, projected lower right-of-way acquisition cost and is consistent with the IRCO LDR's as it relates to right-of-way acquisition. Alignment Al (west alignment) is also consistent with the preferred alignment for 66th Avenue evaluated south of 61" Street. Segment B Preferred Alignment - Alignment B2 is recommended as the preferred alignment between 73rd Street and 81st Street, as compared to Alignment B1, Alignment B3 and Alignment B4, as it results in the second lowest projected total cost (est. $144,000 cost differential separating Alignment B2 vs. Alignment B1) and the fewest amount of residential relocations. Segment C Preferred Alignment - Alignment C is recommended as the preferred alignment between 81st Street and the City of Sebastian City Limit. Alignment C maximizes utilization of existing roadway rights-of-way, minimizes or avoids impacts to the residentially developed properties located 41 MIN^ Kirnley-Horn � I 1 and Associates, Inc. 172 Segment D Alternative Alignments Alignment D1 — City of Sebastian City Limit to Barber Street (West Alignment) Several alternative alignments were evaluated for the Schumann Drive corridor north of the City of Sebastian City Limit to determine the impacts of each. The horizontal alignment associated with the existing Schumann Drive corridor south of Barber Street is substandard and does not meet the minimum design standards established for the corridor. The corridor alignment has been improved to accommodate the proposed auxiliary lanes at the intersection and to meet minimum geometric design standards established for the corridor. Alignment D1 positions the corridor such that all required right-of-way needed to improve the intersection is acquired from the west side of the corridor north of Barber Street while minimizing right-of-way acquisition from the elementary school located along the corridors east side. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 21 parcels and is projected to require relocation of 5 residential properties and 1 active commercial property impact. Refer to Exhibit 9 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment. Alignment D2 — City of Sebastian City Limit to Barber Street (East Alignment) Alignment D2 was developed as an alternative to Alignment D1. This alignment proposed to revise the horizontal alignment associated with Schumann Drive south of Barber Street to meet minimum design standards similar to Alignment D1, but this alignment delineates any necessary right-of- way for Schumann Drive north of Barber Street to be acquired from the west side of the corridor. Alignment D2 positions the corridor such that all required right-of-way needed to improve the intersection is acquired from the east side of the corridor north of Barber Street while avoiding right-of-way acquisition from the single-family residential parcels located along the corridors west side. This alignment will require right-of-way acquisition from 12 parcels (which includes Pelican Island Elementary School property) and is projected to 1 37 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 173 require relocation of 2 residential properties. Refer to Exhibit 10 within Appendix E for a depiction of this alignment. No -Build Alternative The "No -Build" Alternative was also considered. This alternative does not provide an upgraded facility to meet the present and future transportation needs identified by the County. Therefore, it will not meet the County's long-range planning needs, level of service standards established by the Comprehensive Plan nor will it improve the safety associated with pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular mobility. This alternative will not have adverse impacts to the environment and will not result in requiring capital cost allocations associated with construction, right-of-way, utility relocations, etc. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Indian River County has held advertised public workshops and meetings to present and discuss the proposed corridor improvements. A workshop was held on May 24, 2006 where the alternative typical sections and alignments were displayed for review and comment by the public. A public hearing was held on June 13, 2006 where staff presented the alternative typical sections and alignments to the IRCO Board of County Commissioners for adoption. Prior to and following the Board adopting the preferred typical sections and alignments, a number of property owners located along the corridor have voiced concerns and objections relative to the impacts associated with widening the 66th Avenue corridor. COSTS Table 3 summarizes each alignments cost components associated with widening the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor: Table 3: Alternative Alignment Cost Comparison Summary 1 38 C,un Kimley-Horn , and Associates, Inc. 174 Alternative AlignmentTotal Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Right -of -Way Acquisition Cost Estimated Electrical Transmission Relocation Cost Estimated Cost Alignment Al $23,688,000 $5,370,000 $0 $29,058,000 Alignment A2 $28,988,000 $5,315,000 $0 $34,303,000 Alignment A3 $52,728,000 $1,263,000 $0 $53,991,000 Alignment BI $5,594,000 $2,347,000 $1,750,000 $9,691,000 Alignment B2 $6,294,000 $1,791,000 $1,750,000 $9,835,000 Alignment B3 $5,594,000 $2,810,000 $1,750,000 $10,154,000 Alignment B4 $9,924,000 $1,690,000 $1,750,000 $13,364,000 Alignment C $5,021,000 $1,765,000 $1,875,000 $8,661,000 Alignment D1 $3,726,000 $1,925,000 $0 $5,613,000 Alignment D2 $3,726,000 $1,248,000 $0 $4,974,000 No -Build $0 $0 $0 $0 Notes: 1. Construction costs are based upon FDOT and IRCO historical bid tabulations. 2. Estimated utility relocation costs based upon $125,000 per transmission pole relocation. 3. Estimated right-of-way acquisition costs have been based upon average IRCO purchase prices for similarly zoned and improved property. 4. Estimated Right -of -Way Acquisition Cost does not include cost associated with required stormwater facilities. Refer to Appendix C and Appendix D for additional information related to the estimated construction cost and right-of-way acquisition cost, respectively. V. RECOMMENDATIONS The improvements to the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor have been evaluated based on five critical factors: long-range planning, public safety, environmental impacts, alternative alignments and cost. The alternative alignments considered were those that maximize the utilitization of existing roadway right-of-way, minimized impacts to the environment and resulted in minimized impacts to private property. Ten (10) alternative alignments, as 1 39 C=i^ ICunley-Horn MM! 1 and Associates, Inc. 175 well as a "No -Build" alternative, were considered. The summary and conclusions are as follows: LONG RANGE PLANNING The Indian River County MPO Long Range Transportation Plan, as well as the Indian River County Public Works Department's Capital Improvement Plan has the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor identified to be improved to a four lane divided roadway. The IRCO Concurrency Management Report indicates that within the near future, segments of the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor will no longer have capacity to support additional growth within the County while maintaining the County adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards identified within the Comprehensive Plan. While any of the alternative alignments evaluated will provide for the additional roadway capacity to meet current and future traffic demands, the "No -Build" alternative will not address the transportation needs within the County. PUBLIC SAFETY The improvements to the 66th Avenue/ Schumann Drive corridor will provide for or expand facilities associated with pedestrian mobility, bicyclists and vehicular traffic. The corridor improvements will meet current safety and design standards as set forth in the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) "Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways" and Indian River County Design Standards. The selected proposed typical sections evaluated will provide separation of traffic movements, increased drive expectancy, reduced vehicular congestion and decreased accident potential; resulting in improved corridor safety. The "No -Build" alternative will not improve safety along the corridor. ENVIRONMENTAL An evaluation consisting of site characteristics, wetlands, floodplain, potential threatened and endangered species, archeological sites, soils and vegetative characteristics were reviewed within the study limits as it relates to the impact I 40 ^ Kiley -Horn C•11/__I Associates, Inc. 176 along the corridor and projects right-of-way acquisitions primarily into unimproved properties. Segment D Preferred Alignment - Alignment D2 is recommended as the preferred alignment between the City of Sebastian City Limit and Barber Street, as compared to Alignment D1, as it results in impacting the fewest number of parcels along the corridor, the lowest projected total right-of-way acquisition cost, fewer residential property relocations and no commercial property impacts. COSTS The following table summarizes the projected total cost associated with the Preferred Alignment. Table 4: Preferred Alignment Total Project Cost Estimated Right -of - Way Acquisition Cost Preferred Alignment Segments Estimated Construction Cost Estimated Stormwater Facility Acquisition Cost Estimated Electrical Transmission Relocation Cost Estimated Total Project Cost Alignment Al $23,688,000 $5,370,000 $872,000 $0 $29,930,000 Alignment B2 $6,294,000 $1,791,000 $ 546,000 $1,750,000 $10,381,000 Alignment C $5,021,000 $1,765,000 $327,000 $1,875,000 $8,988,000 Alignment D2 Total $3,726,000 $38,729,000 $1,248,000 $10,174,000 $0 $1,745,000 $0 $3,625,000 $4,974,000 $54,273,000 The Preferred Alignment is projected to result in the most efficient utilization of the Counties capital investment. CONCLUSION Based upon the alternative alignments evaluated, Alignment Al, Alignment B2, Alignment C and Alignment D2 is recommended to comprise the Preferred Alignment for the following reasons: 42 Kinsey -Horn C.❑ and Associates, Inc. 177 • Addresses the long-range planning and safety objectives set forth by the County. • Results in the least amount of private property encroachments, while maximizing utilization of existing roadway right-of-way. • Results in the least amount of impacts to other surface waters, wetland, floodplain and endangered species habitat. • Is projected to require the least amount of capital investment to achieve the goals and objectives established by the County. Refer to Figure 16 for the Preferred Alignment delineates, as well as, locations associated with the needed stormwater management facilities. P..; 43 Com/Kimley-Hom I and Assodates, Inc. 178 V-V 3NIIH31VIN a.a ti. Git u\ ,Yl 179 9-9 3NIlHOlVW srti UOJULSdE al4auiliie •- w..:..,yP P.104.�..��s�....,. a 2'c d' ., v i.yY:r+! .'2V it�cidw.4p r R find : +Arc ti4%440444•nt44n+: �d 3 "-ty3� '''''''.4400"4 4 'l ' w Amt 4e. ,k est �4y t,.•.>.•, -a, fin. s ._ fir,.. ..._..,- ... .... - iyyj• rf (.,f: rk. V -V 3NI1H31VW 180 uos)oer sijio . ,'.� ,uower i w: One IS 1 a -t* a 'eV.;. L` 181 a -a 3NIlHOIVW 0-0 3NI1H31VW 182 3-3 3NI1HOEVIN x n.....1.[Wat�. ..u;el:ee .4.i.1,1 Q., 4..y+.s :,IVr 4 ,. (.4 :.t ,; -71' '''',v,,,,,4.2 yam. in b 4.-Z.,-. .i_ "� Iyt0.LIQ a -a 3NIlH31VIN 183 113NI1HOEVIN Y rte- `� i G s .i. r; s�•....�+..:w..n y= 3-3 3NI1HOIWW 184 185 aiir ' 1-1'e P Pub sautoH eP ,t d 4dlea 186 Attorney's Matters - B.C.C. 07.01.14 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners n� FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney l " DATE: June 17, 2014 SUBJECT: Economic Development Council Vacancy On September 13, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution 2011-072, which assigned to the County Attorney's Office the task of monitoring certain committee member terms, and overseeing the process of appointments and reappointments. This agenda item is to consider the appointment of an applicant to fill the position of "Local Manufacturing Industry" representative vacancy on the Economic Development Council, which term expires in January 2015. The vacancy has been advertised on the County's website and on Channel 27 in excess of 30 days, and there was one qualified applicant for this position, whose resume is available for review in the Commission Office: JAMES FUNK RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney recommends that the Board review the applicant's resume, and determine whether to appoint him to fill the unexpired term for the "Local Manufacturing Industry" representative to the Economic Development Council. APPROVED FOR JULY 1, 2014 B.C.C. MEETING — ATTORNEY'S MATTERS .1 fI-\'E i/. B('('.1KenJn I/emos('nmmirtee 1'xnnn (1.'/N'13.Ao, 187 Indian River Co. Ap i r i ed Date Admin. ' t'of.2 /i Co. Atty. ,, Budget / 2$" Dept.Risk ((( Mgr. --- -- 187 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT Name: !James Funk Full Name:James Funk 10-6/09/14 Date: 1 Email Address: liames.funk@piper.com r erm Street Address (No P.O. Boxes): 5565 62nd Place, Vero Beach Florida, 32967 Home Phone: 316-218-5531 Work phone: 1772-299-26681 How long have you been a resident of Indian River County? Cell Phone: t5 Years Are you a full or part time resident? Check one: Full Time111Part Time 772473-2006 Please Iist current employer or business. If retired, please list any business experience that may be applicable to the committee. !Piper Aircraft Inc. 'James Funk, Vice President of Operations , (Over 29 years of Operations Management, Manufacturing Engineering iand_Proaram_I_ead.er_shio_ex. o.erience_.and._ha:s_held, manv_leadershio_oositions in . _ Please list any licenses you presently hold: Please list any organization of which you are currently a member: !None Currently----�-- 1 Please Iist any other committees or boards you currently sit on: None Currently Continued on next page 1871 Place a check mark next to the cornmittee(s) you would like to serve on: AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE BEACH & SHORE PRESERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 1 ENTERPRISE ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD MPO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MPO CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM — CITIZEN ADVISORY TASK FORCE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SCHOOL PLANNING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BOARD TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL — COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Please print and return the completed application, along with a current resume, to the Board of County Commission office, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL. 32960, or by fax at 772-770-5334. Please note: All applications are kept on file for 6 months. Print 1812- (��{ ^ .�� ) L/' '`"` Defense Electronics and the Aerospace Industry. Jim is responsible for alt of Piper Aircraft Manufacturing Operations, Logistics and Quality, Previously, Jim was with Bombardier Lea'ot as the Generat Manager of Operations for the Learjet 85 program and previous to that hetd the position of Vice President of Operations for Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, Jim has also held numerous positions of Leadership for Hawker Beechcraft and Raytheon Aircraft and Raytheon Electronics Division, responsible for prom0s including King Air, Pistons, T -0A and has extensive knowledge in Composite TechnoloManufacturing and Lean principles. Jim hofds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Industrial Engineering from Trenton State College. Jim has attended insigniam Leadership Training, Business Leadership Program — Chicago School of Business and Six Sigma Lean certification training. /g� | u /� 3 JAMES W. FUNK 5565 62nd Place Vero Beach, FL 32967 (316) 733-9779 (772)473-2006 (cell) James,funk@Piper.com Highlights of Qualifications Over 29 years of experience in Operations / Manufacturing Engineering, Program Management. Proven ability to drive strategic change through large, cross -functional organizations Highly motivated and skilled leader with proven track record of responsibility for leading large organizations and complex projects yielding bottom line results. Adept at leading cross -functional teams, in particular multi-location/multi-divisional technology initiatives. Extensive knowledge in Composite Technology, Manufacturing and Lean principles. Professional Experience: PIPER AIRCRAI- t, INC — Vero Beach, FL Vice President of Operations -- 2013 -Present Responsible for all of Piper Aircraft Manufacturing Operations, Logistics and Quality BOMBARDIER LEARJET — Wichita KS, Queretaro Mexico General Manager of Operations — LEARJET 85 2011-2013 Responsible for over 700 employees and 2 Manufacturing facilities in Wichita KS and Queretaro Mex. Responsibilities included Composite technology readiness, Final Assembly, New product start up and introduction, Lean improvement activities, operations strategic planning and technical training. Key Accomplishments: Successfully developed and implemented the Operations Team for the startup of a new product being introduced by Bombardier Learjet. Implemented Manufacturing improvements allowing for the successful build of the first flight test, destructive test and CAST articles. Lead the team to develop and implement tooling concepts, aircraft assernbly and composite manufacturing processes, and supplier logistics in order to improve repeatability, yield and through put. Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Formerly Raytheon Aircraft Company) — Wichita KS Vice President of Manufacturing Operations - Standards, Processes, Systems and Training 2009-2011 Lead a team of 200 employees with 5 direct reports responsible for supporting the Operations team of over 2000 employees. Responsibilities included Production Tooling, Lean improvement activities, operations strategic planning and technical training. Key Accomplishments: Successfully transformed the Operations Team through the implernentation of solid foundational cultural changes and teamwork. Implemented Lean Manufacturing improvements resulting in $19M of cost savings with strategies in place to drive to $36M. Cost of Quality reductions of over $16M achieved through completely overhauling and re -inventing the technical training process resulting in dramatically improved efficiencies. Director and GM of King Air Product Line 2005-2009 Lead a team of 450 employees including all aspects of the King Air Aircraft value stream. Responsible for Operations, Engineering, Materials and Financial P&L of the company's highest volume Aircraft and over $16 in annual sales. Key Accomplishments: Lead the introduction of Product Line focused organizational structure, overseeing the product development and manufacturing of over 195 aircraft annually. Successfully exceeded delivery expectations of 28 Liberty Militarized King Airs to support an accelerated US military mission. Implemented cost savings programs and product improvements resulting in a 7% increase in product margin. (8N Director of Operations Government Business 2002-2005 Lead a team of over 500 employees responsible for the annual production of over sixty T -6A training aircraft for the US Air Force, US Navy, and international customers and a modification center that customized the full range of Beechcraft and Hawker products. Key Accomplishments: Implemented a series of cost savings programs resulting in a 15% decrease in manufacturing hours. Successfully exceeded delivery expectations of T-6 aircraft bringing the schedule position to 45 aircraft ahead of contractual requirements. Implemented Lean concepts and processes that became the benchmark and standard for the entire company. Recipient of the 2005 Program Leadership Award, Director of Operations Composite Manufacturing 1999-2002 Responsible for managing all aspects of the manufacturing operations for Composites, Metal Bond and Composite sub -assemblies. Developed and implemented state of the art in Carbon Fiber placement technology. Key Accomplishments: 95% reduction in behind -schedule shortages while improving productivity. Participated in corporate sponsored Raytheon Six Sigma Celebration 2003 as one of Raytheon Aircraft's top 3 teams achieving a $1.6M savings over 3 years. initiated and supported over 26 process improvement teams as part of the overall Plant 3 strategic plan, booking $3.9M in savings. JAMES W. FUNK Page two Group Management Industrial Engineering and Process Planning 1995-1999 Managed and directed 60 Industrial Engineers and 132 Process Planners supporting all Raytheon Aircraft Company Locations. Primary responsibilities included methods, time studies, processes, tooling, layouts, capital equipment and floor support activities. Raytheon Electronics Division Manufacturing Management industrial Engineering Management Raytheon Equipment Division Manufacturing Program Management Industrial Engineering Education and Training Trenton State College, Trenton, New Jersey. (Fall 1981 Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering — Spring 1984) University of Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts. (Fail 1980 — Majoring in Industrial Engineering Spring 1981) Insigniam Leadership Training Business Leadership Program — Chicago School of Business Raytheon Six Sigma certification Raytheon Six Sigma Leadership Training Zenger Miller Front Line Leadership 1992-1995 1989-1992 1986-1989 1984-1986 \s7.5 Raytheon Middle Management Training Total Quality Management Program Motorola Six Sigma Training Statistical Process Control Quality Management Facilitators Training Course AT&T Istel - Witness Simulation Training Course - Motorola BBN Software - Statistical Process Control and RS/QCAII Training Boothroyd Duhurst DFM/DFMA Systems RES Computer Based Technology Team Lean Manufacturing — The University of Dayton, Ohio Visual Workplace - The University of Dayton, Ohio Participant in the WSU Advisory Council Board of Director Member Wichita YMCA ITEM 14.A.1 July 1, 2014 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 17, 2014 SUBJECT: Intergovernmental Relations and Grants Coordinator Position FROM: Peter D. O'Bryan, Commissioner District 4 I would like to request discussion from the Board on the creation and funding of an "Intergovernmental Relations and Grants Coordinator" position. Back-up provided. Attachment: Intergovernmental Relations and Grants Coordinator Job Description 188 Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Job Description ••-Job Title: Intergovernmental Relations and Grants Coordinator Department: County Attorney's Office Salary Grade: FLSA Classification: Exempt; At -will Reports To: COUNTY ATTORNEY Mission Essential: Yes Prepared By: HR Administration Prepared Date: SUMMARY Under general direction of the County Attorney, the person in this position is responsible for researching, identifying and coordinating various grants and other funding programs and assisting in the development, presentation and promotion of the County's annual legislative program. This position will have direct meetings with the County Attorney, County Administrator, Department Directors and County Commissioners. ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES (Note: The listed duties are illustrative only and are not intended to describe each and every function, which may be performed in the job class. The omission of specific statements does not preclude management from assigning specific duties not listed herein if such duties are a logical assignment to the position.) • Identifies opportunities for County departments to apply for funds from state and federal agencies and other grant and non -grant sources including general appropriations. • Assists in identifying and prioritizing policy issues and projects for inclusion in the County's legislative and appropriations programs. • Assists in promoting the County's legislative policy during state and federal legislative sessions as assigned. • Assists in the development and presentation of the County's annual legislative program. • Develops and maintains meaningful professional contacts with local, state and federal appointed and elected officials. • Maintains an ongoing relationship with all of the County's lobbyists. • Travels to Tallahassee and Washington, D.C. as needed. • Represents the County to the Florida Association of Counties and state and federal agencies. • Works with appropriate staff to represent the County before agencies and committees for providing expert witness or testimony. • Coordinates the grant writing programs within the County. • Makes public presentations to the Board of County Commissioners, state and federal appointed and elected officials. • Other duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES: (Note: The knowledge, skills, and abilities identified in this class specification represent those needed to perform the duties of this class. Additional knowledge, skills and abilities may be applicable for individual positions. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.) • Demonstrated knowledge of the legislative process and state and local governments. • General knowledge of the structure and function of various County departments. • Knowledge of the principles of grant writing and availability of grants. 189 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS & GRANTS COORDINATOR • Knowledge of and experience in making presentations to obtain grants: • Considerable knowledge of the principles and practices of lobbying and the interrelationships between governmental entities. • Considerable knowledge of federal, state and local programs, laws and regulatory requirements. • Ability to effectively communicate the County's interests before elected and appointed officials. • Ability to conduct research and prepare written reports and bill analyses. • Ability to make effective public presentations. • Ability to serve the public and fellow employees with honesty and integrity. • Ability to use computer systems/programs and presentation equipment. • Must possess good research, analytical, writing and oral communication skills, computer and software programs to include the use of work processing, spreadsheet, database or other related system software. EDUCATION and/or EXPERIENCE: • Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a degree in public relations, political science, business, or related field. • Three (3) years of experience in public relations, business, marketing and/or government. A comparable amount of education, training or experience may be substituted for the minimum qualifications. CERTIFICATES, LICENSES, REGISTRATIONS: Must possess a valid Florida Driver's License PHYSICAL DEMANDS: The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. Acceptable eyesight (with or without correction) Acceptable hearing (with or without correction) Ability to sit for long periods of time Requires manual dexterity sufficient to operate a keyboard, calculator, telephone, copier, and other related office equipment as necessary. Ability to lift, carry, push and/or pull objects and materials of light weight (5 — 10 pounds). WORK ENVIRONMENT: The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. Work is performed primarily indoors. Involves frequent interaction with people. May require attendance at night and outdoor meetings. Position requires extensive travel. 2 190 Peter D. O'Bryan From: Kate Parmelee [kparmele@martin.fl.us] lent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:07 PM To: Peter D. O'Bryan Subject: FW: Job Description & Pay Grade Attachments: COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION - Intergovt Relations and Grants Coord.docx Dear Chairman O'Bryan: Per your request, please find attached the position description, range is below. We budget approximately $6,500/year for travel to Washington, D.C. and Tallahassee—that fund is used not just by me but other staff and commissioners at times who need to travel to work on our federal and state legislative and grant priorities. Best regards, Kate Parmelee Intergovernmental & Grants Coordinator Administration Department Martin County Board of County Commissioners 772-320-3095 (o) 772-267-8585 (c) From: Jan Foselli Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 11:52 AM To: Kate Parmelee Subject: Job Description & Pay Grade -li Kate! Attached is your job description. Your pay grade is 115 and the range is $49,875 - $79,286.64. Let me know if you need anything else! Thanks, Jan Foselli Human Resources Analyst Department of Administration Martin County Board of County Commissioners 772-221-1455 (o) 772-223-4812 (f) "The comments and opinions expressed herein are those of the author of this message and may not reflect the policies of the Martin County Board of County Commissioners. Under Florida Law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public records request do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing." 191 ITEM 14.A.2 July 1,2014 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 18, 2014 SUBJECT: Be Floridian Program FROM: Peter D. O'Bryan, Commissioner District 4 I would like to request the Board's consideration for matching grant funds in the amount of $5,000 for the Be Floridian Education Program. Back-up is provided. Attachment: Be Floridian Program in the Indian River Lagoon 192 INDIAN RIVER LAGOON NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM 2014 Work Plan PROJECT PROPOSAL APPLICATION (Use this format to submit your application, all items and questions must be addressed to receive funding consideration) SUBMIT VIA EMAIL in PDF FORMAT TO: IRL2014WorkPlanProposals(u)SJRWMD.Com BY 5:00 P.M. Wednesday January 15, 2014 Project Title: Be Floridian Program in the Indian River Lagoon IRLCCMP Action Plans and assigned Priority level implemented by this project: PIE -1: Implement and expand PIE projects (High Priority) PIE -4: Increase public and government involvement in activities designed to protect and restore the resources of the IRL (High Priority) PIE -5: Strategically prioritize and implement public education programs based on pollution potential, perceived likelihood for behavior change, resource availability, and opportunities that arise. FSD-10: Encourage the proper use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides and reuse water. (High Priority) FSD-11: Educate residents and property owners about the impacts of freshwater and stormwater discharges on the Indian River Lagoon and what they can do to reduce these impacts. (High Priority) Applicant Information: Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program Troy Rice, Director trice@sjrwmd.com (321) 984-4938 A. Project Goals and Objectives: The goal of this project is to bring the successful Be Floridian education campaign to the IRL watershed. Be Floridian was created by the Tampa Bay Estuary Program and has been adopted in Manatee County, Sarasota County, Pinellas County, City of St. Petersburg, City of Tampa, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Sarasota Bay Estuary Program as a way to educate residents about Florida lawn care practices and products. Each of these adopting local governments has established the summer -time fertilizer free ban (June 1- Sept 30). Bringing this established and successful program to the IRL will provide a uniform, regional fertilizer and lawn care education program to each community in the watershed that has adopted a strong fertilizer ordinance with the summer time rainy season application ban. Be Floridian has already created an engaging web site www.BeFloridian.org, radio and print ads, billboard ads and digital ads that can easily be revised for use in the IRL, saving thousands of dollars. Be Floridian provides information on Florida -friendly products, partner companies providing landscape designs and gardening coaches, local yard photo galleries, how -to -videos, information about what's legal in my city and additional resources. The web site also provides 5 -easy ways to Floridify Your Yard, a Get Help service, periodic e -newsletters, and a Homeowners Toolkit. The objective of the IRL Be Floridian Program will be to work with the local governments that have adopted a strong fertilizer ordinance to educate their residents using the resources of the program through a contracted worker who will coordinate with these governments, partner companies, and retail sales outlets (HomeDepot, Lowes, Ace Hardware, etc..). Helping the local governments to create a minimum of 20 Follow the Flock www.followtheflock.org outdoor events in adopting communities. 193 B. Technical Merit/Justification The IRL Be Floridian Program will be managed by the IRL NEP Program Office through a contracted individual to run the program and who will coordinate with local governments that have adopted strong fertilizer ordinances and are interested in participating in the Program. As of earlier 2014, the Cities of Cape Canaveral, Rockledge, Satellite Beach, Melbourne Village, Sewalls Point, Orchid, Grant-Valkaria, and the Counties of Martin, St. Lucie, and Indian River have each adopted strong ordinances. Additional counties and cities will be considering strong ordinances in 2014, and can be brought into the Program if adopted and interested in participating. The IRL Be Floridian Program will help these governments that have adopted the strong fertilizer ordinance to reach out and educate their residents about the new ordinance in a friendly and easily understood way with many resources, advertisement and media venues available to help. The Program can work in conjunction with other residential fertilizer education programs such as Florida Yards & Neighborhoods and Blue Life Florida, and will be arranged to support local projects. The tasks and objectives of IRL Be Floridian Program in 2014-2015 will be completed within the fiscal year by September 30, 2015. Additional funding in future fiscal years may be sought. C. Benefit(s) to the IRL The Be Floridian Program will help to reduce the use of residential fertilizer applications thereby reducing the amount of nitrogen and phosphorous washed into the lagoon and its tributaries within each of the participating communities. A regional, uniform fertilizer application program will provide consistency and a common message in each community participating in the program and will reduce costs by using media and graphics already created and successful used in the Gulf Coast. D. Local commitment The Be Floridian Program is currently not included within any management plans. As local governments sign onto the program they can include the program within the MS4 reports and as the education component for future grant applications (319/TMDL) and the program can be incorporated into master plans when adopted or updated. E. Project Readiness No permits are required and the Tampa Bay Program has offered use of all Be Floridian media and graphics as soon as a program can be started in the IRL. A program statement of work will be prepared if this proposal is successful outlining in detail the tasks to be performed by the contractor and the number of events and activities to be accomplished during the program. F. Partnership and cost sharing Project partners will be solicited and identified if this proposal is successful and included within the annual work plan. All local governments within the watershed that have adopted strong fertilizer ordinances will be approached to determine their interest and willingness to partner in the program. A minimum partnership cost -share will be required by all participating governments and will be based on the number of participants, all cost -share funds will go toward purchase of promotional and branding material for use by the participating government, and additional sponsorships from corporations, small business and retail will be solicited to join the program to achieve the $25,000 in matching funds. $ 73,000 Requested Grant Funds $ 25,000 Match Funds $ Value of In-kind Match (volunteer labor time is $22.14/hr) Match as percentage of Total Project Costs = 25 194 G. Project monitoring/evaluation and maintenance plans Project tasks and measurable outcomes will be developed within the Program's Statement of Work and will include the number of events organized and/or attended, number of HOAs and homeowners contacted, number of advertisements placed in various media and social media venues, and a count of the number of visitors to the IRL Be Floridian web page connected within the already established Be Floridian web site. In future years a simple survey may be created to gauge program efficiency and improvements. IRL Be Floridian will be self sustaining within 3 year of origination through partner contributions, corporate and business sponsorships. H. Education and/or Outreach Components Yes this is a education / outreach program utilizing already created Be Floridian graphics, messaging, advertisements and promotional items, all geared toward promotion of personal behavior changes to reduce fertilizer applications and comply with newly adopted summer time application bans by many local governments. The program will involve a contractor to oversee and coordinate the regional effort and work with partnering local governments to implement Followtheflock programs in participating communities, buy advertisements within the available budget and promote the program within the watershed. Program measurements and success will be gauged by the metrics outlined above in G. I. Experience and Past Performance The Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program has 20+ years of program development and implementation of projects to restore lagoon habitats, treat stormwater runoff, facilitate planning, and conduct education and outreach activities all to implement the lagoon's CCMP. This project has not previously received funding from the IRLNEP or IRL License Plate. J. Special Requirements — TMDLs and Climate Change Yes, this program will help participating local governments implement adopted BMAPs through education and outreach and will help to meet the lagoon's TMDL targets through the reduction of fertilizer applications throughout the watershed. Project Budget including in-kind and cash match amounts and source of all funds: Task Line Item Task Description IRL Funding Amount Cost Share Funding Amount Cost Share Funding Source (cash or in-kind) 1 Contractor 30,000 2 Web page - site creation/maintenance 7 000 ' 3 Adaption of graphics, ads, promotion materials and purchase of promo material 35,000 25,000 $2,500 from 10 participating governments and or corporate sponsorships 4 Project Report 1,000 Summary Cost 73,000 25,000 Project Total Cost 98,000 4 Soon / COun 195 BCC AGENDA July 1, 2014 ITEM 14.D (1) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 25, 2014 SUBJECT: All Aboard Florida (AAF) FROM: Commissioner Bob Solari Some comments on the progress of all aboard Florida. 196 July 1, 2014 ITEM 14.E.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 25, 2014 SUBJECT: Update on the June 19, 2014 Florida Municipal Power Agency Meeting FROM: Tim Zorc Commissioner, District 3 I would like to provide an update on the Florida Municipal Power Agency Meeting in Orlando, Florida held on Thursday, June 19, 2014. 197