The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/10/2015 (3) PROCLAMATION Honoring Deputy Karrie Spooner On her Retirement Effective January 21, 2015 WHEREAS, Deputy Karrie Spooner began her career with the Indian River County Sheriff's Office on February 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, Deputy Karrie Spooner has received more than sixty written commendations over the course of three decades of service written to all four sheriffs she served under Sheriffs R.T. "Tim" Dobeck, Gary Wheeler, Roy Raymond, and Deryl Loar; and WHEREAS, Deputy Karrie Spooner is the first female deputy with thirty years of continuous service with the Indian River County Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, Deputy Karrie Spooner has been a loyal and dedicated Deputy Sheriff and has honorably served the citizens of Indian River County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board acknowledges the contributions Deputy Karrie Spooner has made to the Indian River County Sheriff's Office and to the citizens of Indian River County during her successful career. We wish her a happy and prosperous retirement. Adopted this 10th day of February, 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Wesley S. avis, Chairman Bob-.Solari, Vice Chairman x Peter D. O'Bryan �r Joseph F Flescher Tim Zorc -- -- PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 11-17, 2015, AS "2-1-1 AWARENESS WEEK" WHEREAS, many times when individuals and families need help in meeting life's basic needs or are experiencing times of crisis and are not sure where to turn; and WHEREAS, 2-1-1 is an easy to remember, easy to use three-digit number recognized as the central linkage point in providing individuals and families with the guidance, support and information they need to solve their problems; and with the crisis intervention and suicide prevention they seek to keep them safe; and WHEREAS, Indian River County is fortunate to have 2-1-1 HelpLine, a service that is available any time of day or night that enables individuals and families to get the help they need; and WHEREAS, 2-1-1's specialized advocacy and support services also include the Help Me Grow Initiative which helps link vulnerable families to crucial services while 2-1-1's life-saving "Sunshine" daily phone calls continue to positively impact the lives of local housebound/isolated seniors—all at no cost to those participating; and WHEREAS, 2-1-1 HelpLine service is free, confidential, available 24/7, with highly trained staff who assisted thousands of individuals in need of crisis intervention, assessment and referrals to community services. The staff at 2-1-1 will continue to provide that warm voice at the other end of the line, the caring assistance to the people of our community...and "Hope when you need it most!"; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the week of February 11-17, 2015, be designated as 2-1-1 Awareness Week in Indian River County and the Board urges all citizens to be aware of the only telephone number they need to know to access information and referral to programs and services at over 3,000 sites in our community that provide assistance in such areas as Health Care, Insurance, Volunteering, Food, Day Care, Mental Health Counseling, Support Groups, Financial Assistance, etc. Adopted this 10th day of February, 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Wesley S. Davis, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Joseph E. Flescher Tim Zorc 2 .__. PE _ 00 Kom By PtAy pj_i 1 1 T ) I S = _" _^ _^ � �� — —~ — Case ofthe Year Indian River County-2014 And eldedmman coUod214because howonn�fo�� iHoNmdalone and U� � ��UU��oUUU�� 51062hodjunth'ondimuhorgedfrnmthnhompdu|afowhuurnbefom.OuhnQ1hon»n- � versadnoourSpmjuUs |oumodthat the uuNmhad uo ~'' �mso�ud�mof � Referrals 6177561775 ! insulin. "Hudidn't `want ~Qoback blthe hospital since ^hahad�just been released. i Services �� He thought��hom�h �� better after he got something to ou1 Our 2-1-1 � "��rv��~° 0»U"� |Oonc�Uotwosoonxomodbanousomhothmnht�su�muyh�eboon8Wonbl � . � �� U��v1� No �»�»��.�� U� /ih�pu1�niphor1ud�xhug�.3o�e Soa�o|�tobtained pnnn��on1oxontux � x�nnmnu�v IM's�� nn~°U�� °�� the caller's doctor. Upon learning the details, the doctor indicated th» patient � U��&w�N��U�00 ww ^� ^��^� |sho�dnot have taken insulin.The do�orwas nx1mmo�nuncemodaswmUand � U�mu�wmKu°°~°~° �K�0U�s ��v^� n*� | sent S11blthe house 10bring the patient back tothe hospital,where howas ! trnoted successfully.The doctor's office was very grateful for 2-1-l's intumoV m�/xo��munt � _ ^~mmnot=dfromcomputer sampling ofototal ufs7,zzson-line visits. tion and told us that this was a very serious situation and the elderly gentleman � could have died without our quick support. ' ��! ��|�UUU�� ""�r° ~°^ ~~~~^^~~^~ 1%oYcallers were under 1Oyears old �� UK1% G4%nfmd��wumbetween 1859ynuo�d U��~._ xxnv��omm 21�VfuuUorVwmmG0~years old Assessment&Ro�md-54% 67524 14&Unknown assessed caller's needs mthen provided referrals mmeet those needs � ��Problems & U�Needs Counseling-21% responded mthe emotional state mm,caller maddition mm,essinoneeds Counseling,Assessment&Referral—12% Responded to emotional state,assessed caller's needs,&provided referrals Information Only—8% `*^ provided basic information such x,:phone#o,eligibility req.for services Advocacy/Linkage—3% aswmoothe suo,ionowgating mocomp wxmnvorwxolmmn000nouhum an,cn/n"s system. Emergency|ntenmnUnn/FoUow-up—J% Top 1OReferral Agencies nmawmCoo�H�mmeSominvoCoo�x S4w Indian River County Human Services V/S ' SuWmontdoPoulUudmy(VomBeach) 552 0 0 nnnoBn2 211 Helpline — IndianRiverCounty Basic Needs 893 = 14% Miscellaneous 1,126 = 17% Clothing 22 Abuse/Neglect/Crime 102 Food 399 Animals/Animal Control 26 Household/Fumiture 30 Case Management 43 Shelter 203 Consumer 189 Housing 237 Crisis Line/I&R Other Areas 48 Financial/Assistance 1,842 = 28% Day Care/Child Care 44 Transportation-related assistance 42 Disabilities 49 Utility Assistance 989 Domestic/Victim 3 Rent/Mortgage/Housing Assistance 617 Education 46 SS/Medicare/Medicaid Assistance 45 Emergencies 84 Emergency/Medical Assistance 81 Employment 64 Government/Taxes 58 Government/Taxes 88 Other 10 Holiday Assistance 46 Health/Medical 402 = 6% Hurricane 2 Health/Medical 195 Information 70 Home Health/Rehabilitation 75 Recreation/Leisure 21 Insurance 132 Support Groups 74 Homeless Services 193 = 3% Transportation 125 Legal 262 = 4% Bullying 1 Mental Health/Personal 1,615 = 25% Other 1 Active/Frequent Caller 742 Other 63 = <1% Mental Health 294 Admin 128 = 2% Personal/Interpersonal Problem 377 Substance Abuse 136 Suicide 66 For additional information about this Snapshot,contact Diane M.Huff,Director of Community Initiatives at (561)533-1061 or at diane.huff@211 pbtc.org. For all other questions,please call 211. 2jr1PalmKe.och.org or 21.11reasureCoast.oro Southeast Florida Behavioral Health NetworkI United Way of "2oe[o ' Indian River County 02.2 �., gg )W OFFICE OF 1� okAH4\ve- 4\ Ct�mj F r(Y Lea n► 9 Y 'rOW LEARN EARLY. LEARN FOR LIFE. YokANtt6 Tt,,-s NLAw\6 e-v Flor1da Developmental Disabilities Help Me Grow. Florida Palm Beach/Treasure Coast TM Get Connected. GetAnswers. AW IE HAS OVER 5 AND 211 PALM BEACH /TREASURE COAST HELP ME GROW through brmation Sponsored by the Florida Developmental :)ncerned Disabilities council, Inc.and physical savior or The Florida Department of Education, available Office of Early Learning nect you -ess your 211 Help Me Grow Connects Families To Child Development Services And More! Z� I LISTEN TO YOUR CONCERNS •. SHARE INFORMATION ABOUT CHILD � ® DEVELOPMENTAL MILESTONES ASSIST WITH YOUR QUESTIONS ABOUT 0, dot YOUR CHILD'S DEVELOPMENT,BEHAVIOR OR LEARNING • COMPLETE A DEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING �� • CONNECT YOU TO EARLY INTERVENTION ?; SERVICES tv • FIND SOCIAL SERVICES AND OTHER COMMUNITY SERVICES THAT ARE APPROPRIATE FOR YOU AND YOUR .. FAMILY M • PROVIDE INFORMATION ON SAFE - F--., ------------ SLEEPING,BREASTFEEDING AND OTHER ---- HEALTH PROMOTION ACTIVITIES EASY AND FREE TO USE! >metimes PROVIDE"QUALITY TIME"ACTIVITIES If you live in Martin, St. Lucie, Okeechobee flopment, or Indian River county you can call 211 as ve is right ' FOLLOW UP TO FIND OUT IF YOU often as you want. When you call, you will wonder RECEIVED SERVICES OR NEED ADDRONAL be connected to a Help Me Grow resource RESOURCES specialist who will listen to your concerns, • ASSIST YOU IN ON-GOING MONITORING provide information, and find the right OF YOUR CHILD THROUGH ROUTINE services for you and your family. answers DEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING I children HOURS OF OPERATION provides MONDAY-FRIDAY 8:30 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. ng those You can call 24 hours a day, 7 days a en get a PARENTS, RELATIVES# week to leave a message fo the Help Me dren 0-8 � - � � Grow staff. Just dial 211 and select Help Me Grow. your child PROVIDERS • �ferral for WELCOME TO ® � opmental CA LL ANYTIME. �- y PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2015, AS Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month WHEREAS, Intimate partner violence is a serious and deadly crime in our society, likewise teen dating violence is similarly dangerous, yet only 33 percent of teens tell anyone about the abuse; and WHEREAS, teen dating violence takes many forms including abuse through social media, physical, emotional, psychological, sexual assault, and stalking, furthermore, 81 percent of parents believe that teen dating violence is an issue; and WHEREAS, about 1.5 million high school students nationwide are physically abused by their dating partner in a single year; and WHEREAS, young people who have been victims of dating violence have been found to carry abusive patterns into future relationships; and WHEREAS, Females between the ages of 16 and 24 experience the highest rate of intimate partner violence, almost triple the national average, as one-in-three adolescent girls in the United States is a victims of abuse from a dating partner; and WHEREAS, SafeSpace, Inc. is promoting Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month, offering education for teens, parents, and the community, to increase their knowledge regarding this issue in an effort to promote healthy, safe and non-violent relationships throughout society. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA the month of February, 2015, be designated as Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month in Indian River County. Adopted this 10th day of February, 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IND N RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Wesley S.D va is, hairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan osepl- E. Flescher Tim ZtSrc -- 3 JEFFREY R. SMITH Clerk to the Board1pA December 17, 2014 THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES, CITY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEDIATION Representatives from the Town of Indian River Shores (the "Town"), the City of Vero Beach (the "City"), and the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida (the "County") met in mediation at the City of Vero Beach Community Center, 2266 14th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida, at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, December 17, 2014. The purpose of the mediation was to promote a productive mediation effort as part of the conflict resolution process between the Town, the City and the County relating to the City's Electric Utility. CALL TO ORDER Carlos Alvarez, Esquire, Mediation, Facilitations, and Negotiations, called the meeting to order at 9:35 a.m. He introduced himself as the mediator the parties had retained through the mediation hearing and briefly summarized how he would conduct the hearing. 1. INTRODUCTIONS/PURPOSE OF WORKSHOP Present for the Town of Indian River Shores was Town Manager Robbie Stabe, the Town's Legal Counsel Bruce May and Kevin Cox from Holland and Knight and Terry Deason, Electric Utility Consultant from Holland and Knight, Mayor Brian Barefoot, Town Attorney Chester Clem, and Town Clerk Laura Aldrich. Present for the City of Vero Beach was City Attorney Wayne Coment, the City's Legal Counsel Robert Scheffel "Schef" Wright, City Manager Jim O'Connor, Mayor Richard Winger, and City Clerk Tammy Vock. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 1 December 17, 2014 4 Present for the County were the County's Outside Counsel Floyd Self from Gonzales, Saggio, and Harlan LLP, Tallahassee, County Attorney Dylan Reingold, Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, and Deputy Clerk Terri Collins-Lister. Mediator Alvarez stated that the conflict between the Town, the City and the County fell under the Florida Governmental Conflict Resolution Act as set forth in Chapter 164 of the Florida Statutes. He explained mediation was a conversation between parties in which a neutral party gets involved to help them understand the matter better and to come up with ideas to resolve the conflict. He made it clear this was not an adversarial proceeding, but a collaborative effort from all parties. He added that some mediations could be solved within a day; however, some took more effort and any agreement reached during session would need to be taken back to their respective government bodies to be voted on. He discussed two important ways of negotiating: 1. Interest-Based Mediation - the position of the parties and the process which begins with understanding the problem and identifying the interests that underlie each side's issues and positions. 2. Analyze best and worst alternatives to any settlement proposed - the best and worst alternatives to a negotiated settlement and the parties needed to look at the time put into mediations, as well as the costs, time, relationships of parties afterwards involved in litigation. OPENING STATEMENTS ON THE ISSUES IN CONFLICT Mediator Alvarez turned the mediation over to the Town's, the County's and the City's representatives to give their opening statements, and said he would begin with the Town and the County, then the City of Vero Beach. The Town of Indian River Shores' Opening Statement Bruce May, the Town's Attorney touched on one part of the City's mediation which suggested the City may have misunderstood the Town's fundamental concerns. He referenced in the mediation statement by the City, the City stated the Town's dispute was really about their desire for lower electric rates. He added, while reasonable electric rates were important to the Town and its citizens, the City's history of extremely high rates and its disenfranchisement to the Town and its citizens were really just symptoms of a much more fundamental concern of which the Town believes the City has no real control over its destiny, electric utility and electric rates. He explained as part of the conflict resolution process, the parties participated in a series of local meetings in efforts to resolve the dispute. He said what was clear: 1) the City owns the electric utility which it has contracted to sell to Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), and the City said they were powerless when it came to making the sale happen; 2) the Town applauds the City for trying to lower its electric rates. The City confirmed it simply cannot Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 2 December 17, 2014 5 bring its rates down comparable to FPL because of the City's predecessors who have locked the City into a long-term power supply; and 3) the City continues to set its rates at a level which caused the Town and other captive non-resident customers to produce millions of dollars of surplus electric revenue, which the City transfers to its general operating fund. Attorney May said that faced with those three realities, the Town believes the City no longer has the power or the will to independently manage its electric utility business and thus unable to assure that the Town and its citizens would receive fair and reasonable priced service over the long term. He said the City to date has not acknowledged that the Town has an equally independent fundamental interest and responsibility to protect its citizens from unfair rates and utility prices. He continued that the legislature has given the Town specific expressed statutory powers to provide electric service to its inhabitants by either providing the service itself, or by contracting with other utility providers. He said the core issue was not the high rates, but municipal law and whether the City had the right to assert extra-territorial monopoly electric powers and abstract monopoly rates after the franchise agreement expires in November 2016. He referred to Florida Statutes Section 180.02, Powers of Municipalities. Attorney May indicated the Town had been working on ways to solve this issue for the interest of all parties. He asked the City to consider respecting the rights of the Town to furnish electricity to its residents, pursuant to the express powers granted to the Town in the Laws of Florida, Chapter 29163. Indian River County's Opening Statement Peter O'Bryan, Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, stated the County's long held best solution in the City's electric issue was the full and complete sale of the utility to FPL. He opined the City showed a lack of will to make a 100% commitment to complete the sale, or to explore all options due to their reluctance to pass along tax increases to the citizens of Vero Beach, or to give up their subsidies to the general fund. The County felt with the restrictions of the Florida Municipal Power Agency (FMPA), the City had no leverage being under contract with the FMPA, or bargaining position, and was forced to accept these contracts that continue to perpetuate additional costs passed on to the ratepayers and not the taxpayers. The City of Vero Beach's Opening Statement Robert Scheffel "Schef" Wright, the City's Outside Counsel, stated the City's electric rates were higher than they wished. He said the decisions by the City throughout the years had put them in the position they were in today in terms of electric rates. He reiterated the City was committed to doing everything they could to reduce the electric rates. Attorney Wright pointed out the City signed a contract to sell the whole electric system to FPL and he expounded, "you just cannot walk away from a contract". He explained that the City and the Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC) had an agreement with FMPA, of which OUC Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 3 December 17, 2014 6 determined they could not take an assignment without violating their bond covenant and that FMPA would not change their bond covenants to accommodate OUC. Attorney Wright maintained that the City's interest was to provide safe and reliable service, and continue earning a reasonable return on their equity, as well as provide service at the lowest possible cost by discussions with OUC which provided 60% of the City's power, pursuant to the 2008 Power Purchase Agreement to get lower rates. He indicated OUC has been very generous and cooperative in working towards some options to assist the City in getting rates lowered. He indicated one option was to continue with the contract, which had 15 years remaining, for the full remainder 15 years with substantial discounts, in return for concessions, including an option to buy the St. Lucie output under the purchasing agreement and taking permanent assignment of the gas transportation contract. He pointed out another option was reducing the remaining period to nine years, shortening the term by six years, but with higher prices. Additionally, a rate study was being done by Public Resources and Management Group to evaluate costs, rates, evaluating a specific alternative, and finance capital expenditures, as opposed to paying annual capital expenditures. He anticipated the completion of the rate study sometime in March or April 2015. He concluded the City was on the threshold of issuing a contract to study the system efficiency/optimization of the City Electric System. It was noted the City adopted a resolution authorizing staff to work with the Town and the County with a referendum and a resolution to move forward with a utility authority to provide geographic representation to all customers with the authority to operate the business of the electric utility system. Attorney Wright concluded the City's position was that the electric rates were higher than they would like and that the City's rate of return was reasonable. The City felt the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC) had the superior jurisdiction to declare who served where, and the Town had the statutory power to run an electric utility system. Mediator Alvarez summarized that all parties were in agreement in that they wanted the electric rates lower and everyone/someone would need to suffer a bit or a lot financially going forward. He said everyone had done a great job identifying interests and took the parties through a problem-solving exercise. Mediator Alvarez identified the problems he perceived though the mediation statements provided by the Town, the County, and the City. Parties want Lower Electric Rates in the Long Term A discussion ensued on the electric rates, and the County wanted the City's rates within the range of 5% of the present FPL rates now and going forward. Attorney Reingold stated if the FPL deal does not go through, the County wanted to see lower rates within a 5% range of FPL, plus or minus, an electric utility authority that was controlled by a governing board that fairly and proportionally represents the geographic makeup of the City electric utility customer base and the cessation of the subsidy to the City's general fund by the City of Vero Beach Utility. Attorney May spoke up for the Town and wanted it to be clear that all parties wanted lower rates for the long term. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 4 December 17, 2014 7 Mediator Alvarez brought up the rates and felt the electric generation mix was dis- proportionate. He explained the rates were dependent on the prices of oil, coal, gas, or nuclear. It was one of the reasons for the difference in rates between the City and FPL. Attorney Wright replied in the affirmative and commented the City was coal heavy, whereas FPL rates were gas driven. No Representation of the Town or County Citizens in the Utility Decision Making Commissioner O'Bryan brought up the fact that there was no representation from the Town or County citizens and discussed the transfers between the electric utility and the City's general fund. He brought up the Return on Investment (ROI) and noted FPL's ROI goes to the shareholders. They were the ones who put up the money to buy the stocks and invest the capital, whereas with the City, it was the customers of the electric utility making the investment. He continued stating that when FMPA passed on their excessive fuel costs to the City, the City did not raise taxes to pay for it; they raised the electric rates. It was the County's contention that besides the issue of whether a government agency should be making a ROI, they felt the ROI should go back to customers of the electric utility. He concluded that the County's position to take the 60% paid for by citizens outside the city limits, and to use that to subsidize the taxes for the city residents was immoral and wrong. He stated the 60% included those residents in the County and the Town, who could not vote in the City elections or have a voice on how the money was spent. Mediator Alvarez wondered whether it would be in the interest of the County and Town to have a governance of the utility to be more representative of the citizens they serve, if the City electric rates were the same as FPL rates (long term)today. Attorney May said his research showed the percentage of non-resident customers today, with over 60% of the customers being outside the municipal limits, and currently disenfranchised with no say on utilities management, was unprecedented. He felt if a utility authority was created, it would have control over the utilities finances, operations, and rate setting, including whether to continue or discontinue the utility revenue transfer. Commissioner O'Bryan indicated the County recommendation was a full sale of the City's utilities to FPL to get out from under the FMPA. He said if the County signed a 30-year agreement with the City, and they agreed to charge the County residents a rate equal to FPL, he felt it would be fair enough. Mayor Winger of the City, pointed out FPL was currently seeking $750 million to add to the rates in Oklahoma, as well as adding hundreds of millions of dollars to bills across their service area allowed by public law for engineering of nuclear reactors at Turkey Point. He indicated under Florida Law, a fair amount of engineering development of public utilities was actually paid by the ratepayers. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page S December 17, 2014 8 Attorney May said the Town has a responsibility to its constituents and wants to be in control of its public utility destination. He pointed out that the contracts the City had entered into in the past have essentially stripped away the authority of the City to set its rates. Mediator Alvarez recapped if FPL was to purchase the City's electric system, the rates would not be set by the Town. He added if there was an authority in terms of a settlement, if the authority was in the limits of customers presently being served by the City, how the Town would feel being a minority, even though the citizens outside of the City would be the majority. Attorney May said to have a full and fair Authority, you must have full and total control over the financial and physical operations of the utility, as well as the composition of the Board which would consist of proportionate representation elected from ratepayers residing outside the City. The City needs some Funding from the Electric Utility Business to Fund its own General Revenue Mediator Alvarez recapped the problem was that the City needs to fund its own general revenue and asked what would happen if the Town and County succeeded in going with a different utility provider, and the City was left with these obligations to serve only the City residents. City Manager Jim O'Connor replied there was an analysis done and property taxes would be impacted substantially as well as an increase in the electric rates. He did not anticipate any declaratory bankruptcy, because it was just one business unit of the City that had no real impact on the City's operation; however, the City may raise taxes or lower the services provided. Commissioner O'Bryan stated the Town does not have electric, water, and wastewater utilities to transfer to their general fund, so they provide a level of services to their residents based upon the taxes they collect. The Mediator called for a recess at 11:20 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 11:40 a.m., with all parties present. Mediator Alvarez wanted to discuss potential solutions and asked the parties for potential solutions and interests and referred to the Town. He asked if Attorney May wanted to share his thoughts on a potential solution. Attorney May referred back to the rates, and going forward he felt there was an impression that a regulator in Tallahassee, or a judge, would be making the decision as to whether the City rates were reasonable or prudent. The Town believed what was reasonable and prudent was a decision from a juror residing in Indian River County (IRC) who had paid what the Town believes to be excessive and high rates, and moving forward it would be the juror in Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 6 December 17, 2014 9 IRC to address: 1) whether the rates were reasonable or prudent, and 2) whether the City was being "unjustly enriched" on the backs of the Town and other non-resident customers as a result of this utility revenue transfer. Mediator Alvarez felt it was not in the advantage of anybody to go to trial. Attorney May agreed, and felt that before the Town went down that road, which they were prepared to do, they would make a good faith offer to settle this dispute in a way they felt was fair. Attorney May presented the "Settlement Structure Offered by the Town of Indian River Shores' Mediation Team" and offered to summarize the settlement terms. Attorney Wright wanted a copy of the settlement offer to be able to discuss during lunch. Attorney May stated the settlement structure would be for the purpose of settlement and in return for the Town continuing abatement of its lawsuit against the City for five months to allow the Town to exercise its statutory rights to explore all lawful options to provide electricity to its citizens (either by itself or contracting with another utility). He added as part of the evaluation process, the Town would invite and strongly encourage the City to submit a proposal to provide electricity to the Town citizens for the next 30 years, as well as solicit proposals from other utility providers. He continued, if the City was not selected to continue, then the settlement structure would be the City and the Town could enter into good faith negotiations to determine and agree upon the most appropriate means to discontinue the provision of electric service with the Town after the Franchise Agreement expires. He concluded on June 1, 2015, if the Town would agree, that the City should continue to provide electricity after the franchise agreement expires, then they would dismiss the lawsuit. If the Town and the City do not reach a formal agreement, the Town could proceed with its lawsuit against the City. He said this would give the Town and the City time to look into the matter, and to submit a proposal to give those efforts an opportunity to crystalize before the November 2016 deadline. Attorney May handed out the proposed "Settlement Structure Offered by the Town of Indian River Shores' Mediation Team" to all parties, and a copy was given to the Indian River County Clerk to the Board. A discussion ensued on the Settlement Proposal regarding rate structure; risks such as an increase in the price of gas; the three scenarios: the existing contract, the 15-year contract extension or the 9-year contract extension; the scenario where no funds obtained from the customer go into a general revenue fund and the impact to the electric rates; franchise fees; the municipal electric systems in the State of Florida; the referendum process at a City election; and the state legislature to resolve the electric issue. Mediator Alvarez indicated prior to breaking for lunch, he had a request from Dr. Stephen Faherty to speak. Dr. Faherty provided the mediator with a brief summary of electric issues stemming back to the summer 2007, when he got involved and highlighted the electric rates and FPL rebates. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 7 December 17, 2014 10 The Mediator called a recess for lunch at 12:35 p.m. and reconvened at 1:37 p.m., with all parties present. Attorney Reingold referred to the Town's proposal and the dialog between the City and the Town. He wanted to make everyone aware that the County was in favor of the proposal and the County also wanted to be included in the Town's proposal. Mediator Alvarez asked for the City's thoughts on the Town's proposal. Attorney Wright said the City's mediation team reviewed the proposal and was not in support of it, but would take it to the Vero Beach City Council Meeting on December 17, 2014. He referred to paragraphs one (1) and two (2) of the proposal: Settlement Terms For purposes of settlement, and in return for the Town continuing to abate its lawsuit against the City, the City would.- 1. Expressly acknowledge that the Town may provide electric service to its citizens upon expiration of the Franchise Agreement either through direct provision of such electric service or by contracting on behalf of its residents with another electric utility provider in accordance with the Special Act creating the Town. 2. Honor the Town's right to conduct an evaluation, which may include but not be limited to a Request for Proposal ("RFP')process, of the most appropriate means for the Town to provide electric service to its citizens upon expiration of the Franchise Agreement. In the event the Town issues an RFP, the Town would recognize the Ciry's right to submit a proposal in response to the RFP as a potential provider of electricity to the Town and its residents after the Franchise Agreement expires. Attorney Wright pointed out in Paragraph 1 of the settlement terms: (1) the City was asked to expressly acknowledge that the Town could serve its citizens when the franchise agreement expires. He felt the wording relayed that the City was giving up their position. Mediator Alvarez questioned if Paragraph 1 was removed, what about Paragraph 2. Attorney Wright stated it was the consensus of the City's mediation team that Paragraph 2 was closely related to Paragraph 1. Mediator Alvarez felt it would be beneficial to have more analysis on the issue, so all parties could base their decision on the best data possible. He suggested having a six-month cooling off period to analyze the situation and review the options. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 8 December 17, 2014 11 Mediator Alvarez reviewed some potential solutions: • The settlement terms in the Town's Proposal • One or more of the following actions: a. Some type of independent/representative electric authority b. Reduction of general fund contribution from electric utility revenues c. Amendments of OUC and/or FMPA obligations d. Other rate reduction initiatives through the rate reduction study e. Outside determination of reasonable rates f. FPL purchase g. Expert on the issue retained by all parties Mediator Alvarez said it would be to the benefit of all parties, that further efforts be done over the next six months, and recommended continuing talks with OUC and FMPA with the Town and County parties to such talks to understand the difficulties and legal ramifications of the negotiations. Attorney May clarified the Town envisioned that during the six month cooling off period, they would be able to conduct evaluations, which may include a potential RFP from providers of electricity. The mediator announced a recess for discussions at 1:57 p.m. and resumed at 2:02 p.m., with all parties present. Attorney Wright stated the City agreed to the six-month cooling off period, but would not agree to the document proposed by the Town. He added the Town could do anything they want in terms of conducting a RFP to evaluate its position and alternatives going forward. He indicated the City would continue negotiations with OUC, proceed with the rate study and the system optimization/efficiency study. The City supported having the Town and the County representatives at the OUC, FMPA and FPL meetings as long as those entities agreed. Attorney May said what was missing from Attorney Wright's comments was the core issue for the Town to exercise its right to provide electricity to its citizens, whether it was provided by the Town, or by another provider. Attorney May referred to Florida Statutes Section 180.02, Powers of Municipalities - Any municipality may extend and execute all of its corporate powers applicable for the accomplishment of the purposes of this chapter outside of its corporate limits...provided, however, that said corporate powers shall not extend or apply within the corporate limits of another municipality. He indicated that the Town needed to be in a position that when the franchise agreement expires, there was an agreement with the City that there would be no discontinuance of service or gap. He pointed out that the City has the right to submit a proposal in response to the RFP as a potential provider of electricity to the Town and its residents. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 9 December 17, 2014 12 A discussion followed and the Town expressed its concern of tortious interference with the contract by the City if the Town talks with other potential providers of electricity during the six month cooling off period. Attorney Wright responded the City was good with the six month cooling off period and agreed to no tortious interference if the Town chooses to conduct an RFP with other providers of electricity; however, the City does not agree to the document, but would sign a separate waiver of tortious interference claim. Mediator Alvarez brought up the Town's proposal and suggested adding the wording, the Town may conduct a RFP evaluation with the tortious interference clause inserted in Paragraph 2. The mediator called for a recess at 2:19 p.m. and resumed at 2:31 p.m. with all parties present. Attorney May stated the Town team could not agree with the standstill agreement structure proposed by the City, but agreed to remove Paragraph 1 and add the language discussed in Paragraph 2, and shorten the abatement to May 1, 2015, since the City would wrap up its rate study sometime in March 2015. The concern was the delay and upcoming franchise agreement expiration in the year 2016. Attorney Wright stated the City does not agree to the Town's proposal, but would agree to the tortious interference clause, and to shorten the standstill until Mayl, 2015. Attorney May wanted clarification on what the City was proposing. Mediator Alvarez replied there was an agreement to a cooling off period until May 1, 2015 and the Town conducting a RFP with the City's participation. Mediator Alvarez felt the abatement would be an opportunity to look at every option and suggested the Town rewrite their proposal. Attorney May was opposed to rewriting the Town's proposal because it captured what the Town was looking for to resolve the dispute. A discussion ensued on moving forward without an interim settlement, but talking with other providers. Mediator Alvarez summarized that the parties agreed to a certain time period for options review and agreed that the litigation would be held in abeyance, and continuing with the mediation. The mediator called for a recess at 2:53 p.m. and resumed at 2:59 p.m. with all parties present. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 10 December 17, 2014 13 Attorney May wanted certainty, and proposed that the Town agree with the abeyance of lawsuit for two months, until Monday, March 2, 2015. He asked the City to pursue all options to reduce electric rates, and provide the Town with an outline of their efforts prior to March 2, 2015. Attorney Wright stated the City agreed to no tortious interference and would sign a letter to that effect. Attorney May inquired whether the City could get the agreement in place by January 1, 2015. A discussion ensued regarding FMPA and due to the upcoming holiday season the parties agreed to January 8, 2015. A discussion ensued on the status update requested by the Town and it was determined Attorney Wright would get the update to the parties by February 18, 2015; the mediator would call the impasse if no agreement was reached by March 2, 2015. Attorney May agreed to write the draft Interim Mediation Agreement. Mediator Alvarez asked if the County would delay their meeting with the PSC on February 3, 2015, regarding its Petition for Declaratory Statement. Attorney Reingold was not comfortable telling the Indian River County Board of Commissioners there was a deferral of a month of their PSC Petition hearing. He was set to go forward with the February 3, 2015 meeting. Mr. Peter Gorry, a volunteer on the Finance Commission for the City of Vero Beach, spoke on the City's contract in place with FPL until the end of the year 2016, and noted that rates were set by PSC. He touched on dividends, ROI, the difference between rates and bills, and bond ratings. Mr. Charlie Wilson, President of the Vero Beach Chamber of Commerce, mentioned the City had been promising its residents lower electric rates than FPL for the last 36 years for a cost of$20 million a year, so the cost of litigation does not even come close to the funds spent on a yearly basis. He mentioned the only means of solving the utility issue was either an agreement from FMPA (of which he felt would never happen), so legislation and litigation have replaced negotiations as the only two means of solving the electric utility issue. Mr. Mark Mucher, City of Vero Beach resident, was concerned about the long-term risk of the City being in the electric business. He referred to the Utility Authority and argued that representation was a "feel good" thing, but would not make a difference in terms of the decisions made or the rates paid. Mediator Alvarez concluded that Attorney Wright would write a letter of Waivers and Consents by the City and FPL, and asked Attorney May to draft an Interim Mediation Agreement by Friday, December 19, 2014. He thanked all parties for handling this difficult situation in a cooperative and collaborative fashion. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 11 December 17, 2014 14 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 3:33 p.m. Town of Indian River Shores - City of Vero Beach - Indian River County Electric Utilities Mediation Page 12 December 17, 2014 15 kiol Is 7� . Terri Collins-Lister From: Dylan Reingold <dreingold@ircgov.com> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 8:52 AM To: Joe Baird; Dori Roy; Terri Collins-Lister Subject: Informational Item 7 A Informational Item 7A is the minutes from the December 17th Mediation with the City of Vero Beach and the Town of Indian River Shores. Bruce May, representing the Town, emailed me this weekend requesting one small change. I would respectfully request that the Board pull this item off the agenda so that the issue can be addressed. Thank you, Dylan i Ir'� IRCND Indian nyRiver Count Hospital District January 20, 2015 Mr. Jeffrey R. Smith Clerk of the Circuit Court Indian River County Court House Vero Beach,FL 32960 Dear Mr. Smith: RE: Indian River County Hospital District Meeting Schedule Please be advised that the Indian River County Hospital District Board of Trustees Regular Monthly Meetings will continue to be on the third Thursday of each month, at 4:30 p.m. The meetings will be held in the Indian River County Administration Building, County Commissioner's Chambcrs, 1801 27t' Street—Building A,Vero Beach,FL 32960. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 770-0935. Cordially, uJi Hall oordinator of District Affairs Jah cc: Jennifer Peshke Board of Trustees County Attorney Office County Commission Office Hillary Copsey,Vero Beach Press Journal BOARD OF TRUSTEES Thomas J.Spackman,M.D. Chairman Eugene P.Feinour, Vice Chairman • Trevor Smith • Alma Lee Loy • Burton J.Lee,M.D. • Dr.Michael Weiss • Harris Webber 3730 Seventh Terrace,Suite#204-B, Vero Beach,Florida 32960 (772)770-0935 Fax(772)770-1974 16 r : INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FEBRUARY 10, 2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: January 28, 2015 Subject: 2015 ELECTION OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN From: Dori Roy Assistant to the County Administrator At the January 20, 2015 Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) meeting, the members voted to elect Alan Polackwich, Sr. as Chairman and Todd Brognano as Vice Chairman for 2015. No Board action is required. 17 � { i INFORMATIONAL ITEMS February 10, 2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: January 28, 2015 Subject: 2015 ELECTION OF CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN From: Dori Roy Assistant to the County Administrator At the January 26, 2015 Code Enforcement Board meeting, the members voted to elect Mr. Karl Zimmermann as Chairman, and Mr. David Myers II as Vice Chairman of the Code Enforcement Board for the year 2015. No Board action is required. 18 INFORMATIONAL ITEMS February 10, 2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: January 28, 2015 Subject: Member at Large Vacancies on the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit Advisory Committee From: Misty L. Pursel, Commissioner Assistant This is notification that the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit Advisory Committee has two vacancies. Both vacancies are for Member at Large positions. Interested parties must be owners of property within the boundaries of Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit. These meetings are held as need, location posted in advance. Applications can be obtain by contacting Misty L. Pursel, Commissioner Assistant, Board of County Commissioners Office, County Administration Building A, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960; mpursel(cb-ircgov.com or 772 226 1442. F:\BCC\Agenda Item s\2015\informational -VLE MSTU.doc 19 a INFORMATIONAL ITEM FEBRUARY 10, 2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: January 28, 2015 Subject: FY 2013-14 Records Disposition Compliance Statements and Records Management Liaison Officer Forms From: Dori Roy, Records Management Liaisfficer Assistant to the County Administrator As a Florida Public Agency we are required by Rule 1 B-24.003(11), Florida Administrative Code, to submit annually to the Florida Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services, a signed statement attesting to our compliance with records disposition laws, rules and procedures. Attached for your information are the Records Disposition Compliance Statements for October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014 for the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, Solid Waste Disposal District, and Emergency Services District. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Indian River Co A p ved Date Administrator ,1 BY: Attorney FOR: February 10, 2015 Attachments: Letters Dated November 3, 2014 from FL Department of State Record Disposition Compliance Statements 20 RECEIVED NOV - 7 2014 BOARD OF COUNI'Y .� � COMMISSION .••40U NAL T� FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 0 f STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State November 3, 2014 Ms. Laura E. Vasquez Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1801 27th Street Building A Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 Dear Ms. Vasquez: As a Florida public agency, you are required by Rule 1 B-24.003(11), Florida Administrative Code, to submit annually to the Division of Library and Information Services, "a signed statement attesting to the agency's compliance with records disposition laws, rules, and procedures." Based on these annual statements, an annual report on statewide compliance is submitted to the Legislature and the Executive Office of the Governor for their consideration and action. For your convenience, we are providing the enclosed Records Management Compliance Statement to report your agency's compliance status. Please complete all information in Section I, the Compliance Certification, and make any necessary additions or corrections in Sections II and I11. Please return one signed copy of the form (do not return this letter) to the mailing address or email address indicated at the bottom of the form by December 31, 2014. We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. If we can be of service to your agency, please do not hesitate to contact us at 850.245.6750, or by email at recmgt(a(&dos.myflorida.com. Sincerely, �y Gerard J. Clark, Bureau Chief, Archives and Records Management Division of Library and Information Services GJC/eg Enclosure Division of Library and Information Services R.A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street* Tallahassee, Florida 32399 .,� Uil k, 850.245.6600 • 850.245.6'735 (Fax) info.florida.gov �' VIVA fIORiDA_ promoting Florida's History and Culture VivaFlorida.org � 21 RECORDS MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Agency ID: C0620500 1. This agency is in compliance with Section 257.36(5), Florida Statutes', and Rule 1 B-24.003(9), Florida Administrative Code2,for all public records regardless of media or format(e.g.,paper; electronic, including email; microfilm; audio; video; etc.). (� Yes ❑ No(Unmarked responses will be recorded as not in compliance.) v 2. This agency disposed of cubic'��i cubic feet of records during the fiscal year indicated above. d3. This agency disposed of records in electronic form during the fiscal year indicated above. U ❑Yes 0 No(It is not necessary to indicate volume of electronic records disposed.) 4.0 du 4. El Check here if you would like to be contacted for assistance. Indicate your questionslareas of concern on U) the reverse side. .Q Agency Head Signature: Date: E U �printNameof Agency Head a _J-6:s& nAt ("d Title of Agency Head(please print): 0 GL I)"�ll R m`??h r2itn r OPlease indicate changes to Agency Information on lines provided on right. :.+ Current Information: Please do not erase or cover information below. Indicate changes or additions on lines below: E C L Agency Name: Indian River County Board of County Commissioners O _ /� r� V Agency Head: Mr. Peter D.O'Bryan /'1 r, �J D5e(�� f[ � [Xr+t rJ d � to c Address: 1801 27th Street Building A tT Q Vero Beach,Florida 32780 Section 257.36(5)(a), Florida Statutes', requires public agencies to designate a Records Management Liaison Officer (RMLO). Please indicate changes to RMLO Information on lines provided on right. If Current Information is blank, please designate an RMLO for your agency on lines provided on right. C Current Information: M Please do not erase or cover information below. Indicate changes or additions on lines below: O O RMLO: Ms.Laura E.Vasquez r(S . DD R .5 IAZO Y 4' = Address: 1801 27th Street V d O Cl) J Building A Vero Beach,FL 32960-3365 329(y0 -3388 Phone: (772)226-1919 Ext.: 7 72 8 Email: Ivasquez@ircgov.com d r6 V�� i r-r P rn 'Section 257.36(5),Florida Statutes:"For the purposes of this section,the term'agency'shall mean any stale,county,district,or municipal officer,department,division, bureau,board,commission,or other separate unit of government created or established by law. It is the duty of each agency to:(a)Cooperate with the division in complying with the provisions of this chapter and designate a records management liaison officer.(b)Establish and maintain an active and continuing program for the economical and efficient management of records" 2Rule 1B-24.003(9),Florida Administrative Code:"Public records may be destroyed or otherwise disposed of only in accordance with retention schedules established by the Division.Photographic reproductions or reproductions through electronic recordkeeping systems may substitute for the original or paper copy,per Section 92.29,F.S., Photographic or electronic copies...Prior to records disposition,agencies must ensure that all retention requirements have been satisfied.For each record series being disposed of,agencies shall identify and document the following:1.Records retention schedule number;2.Item number;3.Record series title;4.Inclusive dates of the records;5.Volume in cubic feet for paper records;for electronic records,record the number of bytes and/or records and/or files N known,or indicate that the disposed records were in electronic form,and 6. Disposition action(manner of disposition)and date" Please complete and return this compliance statement by December 31, 2014 (submit one copy only, please)to: Department of State Records Management Program, Mail Station 9E OR Email to: recmgt@dos.myflorida.com Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 22 RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT NO. PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES 1. AGENCY NAME and ADDRESS 2. AGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) Indian River County BCC Human Resources Department Shelley Nowlin 1800 27"' Street, (772) 226-1449 Ext. Vero Beach, Florida 32960 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). ® a. Destruction ❑ b. Microfilming and Destruction ❑c. Other 4. SUBMITTED BY: I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below, that any audit requirements for tl�e records have be n fully justified, and that further retention is not required for any litigation pending or imminent. Colleen Peterson, Human Resources Manager January 21 2014 Signature Name and Title Date 5. LIST OF RECORD SERIES f. g a b, C. d e. Volume Disposition Schedule Item Title Retention Inclusive In Action and No No. Dates Cubic Date Feet Completed After Authorization Personnel Records: FL Retirement GS1-S1- 19 System 25 FY 10/1/87—09/30/88 5.0 GS1-SL 111 Insurance Records 5 FY 10/1/07 —09/30/08 5.0 GS1-SL 17 Correspondence & Memoranda: Administrative 3 FY 10/1/09—09/30/10 2.0 Equal Employment Opportunity GS1-SL 103 Compliance Records (A/A Survey Forms) 4 Yrs 01/01 — 12/31/09 1.0 GS1-SL 24 Employment Application & Selection Records (Record Copy) 2 Yrs 01/01 — 12/31/11 5.0 _. _._ GS1-SL 195 Payroll Records: Supporting Documents 3 Yrs 01/01 — 12/31/10 29.0 ........ _ _ GS1-SL 66 Personnel Records: OPSNolunteer/ Intern/Temporary Employment 3 FY 10/1/09 09/30/10 2.0 GS1-SL 110 GrievanceRecords 3 FY 10/1/09—09/30/10 2.0 ..._..__ ......_.... _. _ GS1-SL 82 Affirmative Action Records 2 Yrs 01/1/99 - 12/31/11 1.0 GS1-SL 88 Budget Records 2 FY 10/1/10—09/30/11 1.0 6. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed records 7. DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE: The above listed records have been is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. disposed of in t e manner and on the date shown in column g. Signature ate Colleen Peterson Human Resources Manager stodian/Reco s Manag n ' n Officer at Name a Title Laura Vasquez Witness 23 01/23/2014 Page: Southeast Secure Shredding pl fli 3910 US Highway 1 (AAAABJXK) Vero Beach, FL 32960 (CVCD) 772-562-6556 non-Site Shredding Certificate Off-Site Customer: OIRHR Indian River County Human Resources Address: 1800 27th St, Building B Next Visit: Vero Beach, FL 32960 Bill To: OIRHR-000000000000000 Indian River County Human Address 2 Mail Stop Placement Asset Status Building B office (LB)By Weight Southeast Secure Shredding hereby certifies that the materials received on the above date will be confidentially handled and destroyed and that the shredded materi I will then be recycled. Customer Driver Signature: Date: 13 1 Signature: Date: � / r Bin Type Counts: iLB) By Weight: 1 shredcrT.frx 24 to N outheast Cu e re din g SECURE SOLUTIONS FOR DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION CERTIFICATE OF DESTRUCTION THIS CERTIFIES THAT ALL RECORDS AND MATERIALS RECEIVED FROM Indian River County Human Resources 1800 27the Street, Building B Vero Beach, FL 32960 HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY DESTROYED BY A CERTIFIED SHREDDING PROCESS. It is further certified that records were not excessively handled, tampered with, or read by anyone with Southeast Secure Shredding, Inc. 3910 US Highway 1 Vero Beach, FL 32960 772-562-6556 ti�ON FOK INrp'Et Date Destroyed 01/23/2014 Weight: 830 lbs. �I a� President RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES 1 AGENCY NAME and ADDRESS 2, AGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) Jennifer Hyde, Manager Indian River County BCC Purchasing Division ( Purchasing Division 1800 27th Street (772) 226 - 1575 Ext. Vero Beach, FL 32960 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). E) a. Destruction ❑ b. Microfilming and Destruction ❑ c. Other 4. SUBMITTED BY: I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below, that any audit requirements for the records have been fully justified, and that further retention is not required for any litigation pending or imminent. 1ir1i t {'� I G t 1 I� ,u �V l %6nkure Name and Title Date 5. LIST OF RECORD SERIES a b c d e. Volume Disposition Schedule Item Title I Retention Inclusive In Action and No No In Cubic Date Feet compieted After Authorization GSI- 72 ~ RID RECORDS: NON-CAPH'A1, ---- 5 FY 10iL2O03 9i30'200b 122 lzeLi (eA 414111- S1. 1MPROVEMEN"! c� efd ,l GSI- 42 PURCHASING RECORDS 5 FY 10/1/2004-9/30/2008 18 ol�A6c► 4444�( SL I12,`yCl,4t d� 4 r� . I GSI- 52 TRAVEI, RECORDS 1 5 FY 10,1 2002-9/3W2008 I ,1 SL I GSI- 371 S"YAFF ADMINISI'1tA'FIVE RECORDS UN'lll. 10!1/2003-9'30/2013 �I 1 6Ec4,s� OBSO- i 1i41,a LETS 6. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed 7. DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE: The above listed records have been records is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. disposed of in the manner and on the date shown in column g Signature Date todian/Recor Manage t Lia s Officer pate Name and Title —�`-- Witness 26 RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT NO. PAGE OF PAGES 1. AGENCY NAME and ADDRESS 2. AGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) T��tah V,Xq-a-v CovAkA (�nimd� Cvn�ro\ ,jASch U�t�Vi� u3�s N3rd �tr`�-tov V e ro (Sema,, F, 32 9 1 (��'l ) LZ l� - �{P(v Ext. 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). Ira. Destruction ❑ b. Microfilming and Destruction ❑ c. Other 4. SUBMITTED BY: I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below,that any audit requirements for the re rds v een fully justified,and that further retention is not required for any litigation pending or imminent. r, u a av ab >f Sig Oture Name and Title Date 6. LIST OF RECORD SERIES f g. a b. c, d e. Volume Disposition Schedule Item Title Retention Inclusive In Action and No. No. Dates Cubic Date Feet Completed After Authorization G51 -SL MIA C-01 �-D 1 �ecordS �4� -1a�vuc� �o�� —s�t,� X01( .� yQars 0 6. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed 7.__DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE: The above listed records have been records is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. = disp sed o tier and on the date shown in column g. Date Y (A- stodian/Records Manageme iaon!)cer ate NaKe, rTfi Title ,'�J ��'\J itriess 27 O9ce Of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Laura Vasquez —Records Management /Liaison Officer FROM: Dylan Reingold—County Attorney DATE: October 8, 2013 SUBJECT: Records Disposition Documents The following listed record series that were authorized for destruction have now been destroyed, and a completed and fully executed copy of each Records Disposition Document is attached for your records and/or reporting needs: Series Description Administrative Support Records READ files (3/2003-5/2010) Transitory Messages telephone message books (12/2004-8/2009) Calendars calendars (2000-2011) nhm attachments cc: Dori Roy 28 =RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT NO. PAGE OF PAGES 1. AGENCY NAME and ADDRESS 2. AGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) Board of County Commissioners of Indian Laura Vasquez,RMLO River County 1801 27°i Street 1801 27t" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226 - 1919 Ext. 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). ® a. Destruction ❑ b. Microfilming and Destruction ❑c. Other a. SUBMITTED BY: I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below,that any audit requirements for ;;nature records h�fu — nd that further retention is not required for any litigation pending or imminent. �ZD0 �nR�,, 1 COU-A' PVA-3r 2,-7 l3 Na and Title Date ib f.a b. c . Volume 9, de. Disposition Schedule Item Title Retention Inclusive In Action n No. No. Dates Cubic Date Feet Completed After GSl- 3 Administrative Support Records Authorization SL pp Duplica 3/2003 -5/2010 10.5 ecycled tes 10/7/201 i. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed 7. DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE: The above listed records have been records is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. disposed of in the manner and on th to shown in column g. 10/7 l3 / ature Date / u odian/Records Management L' n Offi er Da a Nam d Title j Witness 29 RECORDS INVENTORY WORKSHEET Contact Phone No. rDepartment/Section Indian River County Attorney's Dylan Reingold, County Attorney 772-226-1427 Office Location of Records Schedule No. Item No. Room A2-612 File GSI-SL 3 Records Series Title Administrative support Records Record/File Title READ files (WGC; WKD; MEF; GG; BO) Description(Contents, Purpose,and Use: Include form title and numbers, if any) Duplicate copies of work product chronologically filed by originator. Only used by originator for purposes of reference ease. No longer has administrative value. ❑ Record Copy Duplicate copy File Type Cut-Off Date Arrangement Authorization for Series ❑ Subject ❑ Calendar Year ❑ Alphabetic by ❑ a. Statute ❑ Case/Business Activity El Fiscal Year ElAl hanumeric by ❑ b. Regulations ❑ Working Papers ❑ Anniversaryp ® Reference y N/A El by ❑ c. Administrative E) Index ® Continuous ® Chronological b ❑ Other ❑ Other (Citation) Record Form ® 8-1/2" x 11"paper(letter size) ❑ 11"x 15"computer printouts ❑ Computer disks ❑ 8-1/2" x 14"paper(legal size) ❑ 11"x 8-1/2"computer printouts ❑ Compact disks ❑ Bound books, catalogs ❑ Roll microfilm El 3"x 5"Cards ❑ Microfiche E) Computer tapes/cartridges ❑ Video tapes E] 4"x 6"Cards E] Other ❑ Optical disks Electronic Records Filing a. What is the name of the system? b. Who owns the system? c. What operating system is needed to retrieve and view files? d. What application software is needed to retrieve and view files? e. What is the file format? (.doc, .xis, Aif, .rif,etc.) f. What is current age of media on which records are stored?(1 year,5 years,etc.) g. How quickly is this information usually needed? (within minutes, days,weeks,etc.) h. How often is this information accessed?(daily, weekly,monthly, etc.) I. What business activity do these records support? j. Are there any records related to these records? k. Do you need more assistance with assessing these records? Current Holdings Year Paper Electronic (Inclusive Dates) Cubic Feet Bytes/Item Type Filing Equipment Used Quantity Count _ 10.5 file drawers 7 30 EActive re these records? Who uses these records? ccessed frequently; weekly or immediately) Not used - no administrative ive (accessed periodically; monthly or less often) value no need to retain in the active office area) Place an "X"in the proper column (If the answer is "yes", explain on the below.) YES 1. Is this De artment the official record holder? NO 2. Are there copies of this record series or major portion of it in this Department?3. Are there copies of this record series jor major portion of it in another Department? ❑ 4. Does this record series contain information exempt from public access? 5. Is there any le al re uirement affecting disposal of this record series? ❑ 6. Does this record series contain information subject to re ulato requirements? 7. Does this record series contain information sub ect to legal requirements? ❑ 18. Does this record series contain information used in the subject to audits? ❑ 9. Is this record series needed because of archival or historic interest? 10. Are these vital records? ❑ Responses to Questions and Additional Comments Eaeh -Ali Retention N f �Recommended Retentio l� Inventoried By Dat Reviewed By Date 31 RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT NO. PAGE OF PAGES 1. AGENCY NAME and ADDRESS TGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) Board of County Commissioners of Indiana Vasquez,RMLO River County 27"Street 1801 27`r' Street Beach, FL 32960 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226 - 1919 Ext. 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). ® a. Destruction ❑ b. Microfilming and Destruction ❑c. Other 4. SUBMITTED BY: I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below, that any audit requirements for the records have been fully justified, and that further retention is not required for any litigation pending or imminent. ignature � r^ � ' me and Titl Date f. a b. 9C. d e. Volume Disposition Schedule Item Title Retention Inclusive In Action and No. No. Dates Cubic QaIg Feet Completed After GSI- 146 Transitory Messages Record 12/2004- 8/2009 Authorization SL Copy recycle 10/7/20 3 6. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed 7. DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE: The above listed records have been records is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. ,--diissp�osed of in the manner and on the date shownincolumn g. na � t g Date -� /3 Rei. u ,u odian/Records Manage ent Liais Ice Dat NamtdTftleWitnesst�lC►�V)C�1 Massa 11, 32 RECORDS INVENTORY WORKSHEET Department/Section Contact Phone No. Indian River County Attorney's Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Office 772-226-1427 Location of Records Schedule No. Item No. Room A2-612 File GSI-SL 1.46 Records Series Title Transito Messages Record/File Title Phone Message Books Description(Contents, Purpose,and Use: Include form title and numbers, if any) canary copy of phone messages logged by SW and NM for periods from 12/2004 through 8/2009 ® Record Co ❑ Duplicate Co py File Type Cut-Off Date Arrangement 9 Authorization for Series ❑ Subject ❑ Calendar Year ❑ Alphabetic by ❑ a. Statute ❑ Case/Business Activity ❑ Fiscal Year ❑ Alphanumeric b ❑ Working Papers El Anniversary p y El b. Regulations ® Reference ry ❑ Numeric by E] c. Administrative ® Continuous ® Chronological by N/A ❑ Index ❑ Other ❑ Other (Citation) Record Form ❑ 8-1/2" x 11"paper(letter size) ❑ 11"x 15"computer printouts ❑ Computer disks ❑ 8-1/2" x 14"paper(legal size) ❑ 11"x 8-1/2"computer printouts ❑ Compact disks ® Bound books, catalogs ❑ Roll microfilm ❑ Computer tapes/cartridges ❑ 3"x 5"Cards ❑ Microfiche ❑ Video tapes ❑ 4"x 6"Cards ❑ Other ❑ Optical disks Electronic Records Filing a. What is the name of the system? b. Who owns the system? c. What operating system is needed to retrieve and view files? d. What application software is needed to retrieve and view files? e. What is the file format? (.doc, .xIs, Alf,.rtf,etc.) f. What is current age of media on which records are stored?(1 year,5 years,etc.) g. How quickly is this information usually needed? (within minutes, days,weeks,etc.) h. How often is this information accessed?(daily,weekly, monthly, etc.) i. What business activity do these records support? j. Are there any records related to these records? k. Do you need more assistance with assessing these records? Current Holdings Year Paper Electronic (inclusive Dates) Cubic Feet Bytes/Item Type Filing Equipment Used Quantity Count 1 file drawer 1/2 33 How active are these records? Who uses these records? ❑ Active(accessed frequently;weekly or immediately) Not used - no administrative ❑ Semi-active (accessed periodically; monthly or less often) value ® Inactive(no need to retain in the active office area) Place an "X" in the proper column (If the answer is "yes", explain on the below.) YES NO 1. Is this Department the official record holder? 2. Are there copies of this record series or major portion of it in this Department? 3. Are there coRies of this record series or major portion of it in another Department? 4. Does this record series contain information exempt from public access? S. Is there any legal requirement affecting disposal of this record series? 6. Does this record series contain information subject to regulatory requirements? 7. Does this record series contain information subject to legal requirements? ❑ 8. Does this record series contain information used In the subject to audits? 9. Is this record series needed because of archival or historic interest? ❑ 10. Are these vital records? ❑ Responses to Questions and Additional Comments Retention Recommended Retention Inventoried By Date Reviewed By Date 34 RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT NO. PAGE OF PAGES 1. AGENCY NAME and ADDRESS 2. AGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) Board of County Commissioners of Indian Laura Vasquez,RMLO River County 1801 27`x' Street 1801 27t" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226 - 1919 Ext. 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). ® a. Destruction ❑ b. Microfilming and Destruction ❑c. Other 4. SUBMITTED BY: I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below,that any audit requirements for the records have bee llyyustified, and that further retention is not required for any litigation pending or imminent. Dylan Reingold, County Attorne 'L Signature Name and Title ate », g r t. a 9, b. c d. e. Volume Disposition Schedule hem Title Retention Inclusive In Action n No. No. Dates Cubic Date Feet Completed Atter GSI- 89 CalendarsAuthorization SL Record 2000-2011 � Copy recycle 10/7/2013 S. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed 7. DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE: The above listed records have been records is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. disposed of in the manner and on the date shown in column g. gnature CFOte na `� C �� todian/Records M nagement Off ate Name Title ` Witnes qjjy 35 RECORDS INVENTORY WORKSHEET Department/Section Contact Indian River County Attorney'sPhone No. Office Dylan Reingold,County Attorney 772-226-1427 Location of Records Schedule No. Item No. Room A2-612 File GSI-SL 89 Records Series Title Calendars Record/File Title Calendars Description(Contents, Purpose, and Use: Include form title and numbers, if any) Calendars showing appointments and meetings - used only by attorneys and staff WGC-2000; WKD-05/06; LK-2007; idN7-2000-2011 ® Record Copy Duplicate Co py File Type Cut-Off Date Arrangement Authorization for Series ❑ Subject ❑ Calendar Year ❑ Alphabetic by ❑ Case/Business Activity ❑ Fiscal YearEla. Statute EJ Working Papers ❑ Alphanumeric by ❑ b. Regulations ❑ Anniversary ❑ Numeric b ® Referpnce ® Continuous ® Chronological b ❑ c. Administrative ❑ ❑ Other Index ❑ Other g y N/A Record Form (Citation) ❑ 8-1/2" x 11"paper(letter size) ❑ 11"x 15"computer printouts ❑ 8-1/2" x 14" (legal ) El Computer disks paper le al size ❑ 11"x 8-1/2"computer printouts ❑ Compact disks ElBox 5 ound Cards, catalogs El Roll microfilm El Computer tapes/cartridges ❑ 4"x 6"Cards El Microfiche ❑ Other ❑ Videotapes ❑ Optical disks Electronic Records Filing a. What is the name of the system? b. Who owns the system? c. What operating system is needed to retrieve and view files? d. What application software is needed to retrieve and view files? e. What is the file fonnat? (.doc, .xIs, Alf, .rtf, etc.) f. What is current age of media on which records are stored?(1 year, 5 years,etc.) g. How quickly is this information usually needed? (within minutes, days,weeks,etc.) h. How often is this information accessed?(daily,weekly,monthly,etc.) i. What business activity do these records support? j. Are there any records related to these records? k. Do you need more assistance with assessing these records? Current Holdings Year Paper Electronic (Inclusive Dates) Cubic Feet Bytes/Item Type Filing Equipment Used Quantity Count 1 file drawer 1/2 36 EHowactiveare these records? Who uses these records? ccessed frequently; weekly or immediately) Not used - no administrative ive (accessed periodically; monthly or less often) value (no need to retain in the active office area) FPIacean "X"in the proper column (If the answer is "yes",explain on the below.) YESthis De artment the official record holder? NO . Are there copies of this record series or major portion of it in this Department? 3. Are there copies of this record series or major portion of it in another Department? 4. Does this record series contain information exempt from public access? 5. Is there any le al requirement affecting disposal of this record series? 6. Does this record series contain information subject to re uIatory require 57 7. Does this record series contain information subject to legal requirements? 8. Does this record series contain information used in the subject to audits? 9. Is this record series needed because of archival or historic interest? 10. Are these vital records? Responses to Questions and Additional Comments ad by staff- Retention Recommended Retentio Inventoried By Date Reviewed By Date 37 L f FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 0 f STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State November 3, 2014 Ms. Darcy Vasilas Solid Waste Disposal District Indian River County 1840 - 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 Dear Ms. Vasilas: As a Florida public agency, you are required by Rule IB-24.003(11), Florida Administrative Code, to submit annually to the Division of Library and Information Services, "a signed statement attesting to the agency's compliance with records disposition laws, rules, and procedures." Based on these annual statements, an annual report on statewide compliance is submitted to the Legislature and the Executive Office of the Governor for their consideration and action. For your convenience, we are providing the enclosed Records Management Compliance Statement to report your agency's compliance status. Please complete all information in Section I, the Compliance Certification, and make any necessary additions or corrections in Sections I1 and III. Please return one signed copy of the form (do not return this letter) to the mailing address or email address indicated at the bottom of the fond by December 31, 2014. We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. If we can be of service to your agency, please do not hesitate to contact us at 850.245.6750, or by email at recmgt(a)dos.myflorida com. Sincerely, Gerard J. Clark, Bureau Chief, Archives and Records Management Division of Library and Information Services GJC/eg Enclosure r Division of Library and Information Services R.A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street* Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.245.6600 • 850.245.6735 (Fax) info.tlorida.gov VIVd FLORIDA,. Promoting Florida's History and Culture VivaFlorida.org38 RECORDS MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Agency ID: N0000527 021 i. This agency is in compliance with Section 257.36(5), Florida Statutes',and Rule 1B-24.003(9),Florida Administrative Code2,for all public records regardless of media or format(e.g., paper;electronic, Including email; microfilm; audio;video;etc.). MYes El (Unmarked rU )0esponses will be recorded as not in compliance.) 2. This agency disposed of cubic feet of records duringthe fiscal year indicated above. d3. This agency disposed of records In electronic form during the fiscal year indicated above. O U ❑Yes No(It is not necessary to indicate volume of electronic records disposed.) V � d V 4• ❑Check here If you would like to be contacted for assistance. Indicate your questions/areas of concern on fn q the reverse side. E Agency Head Signature: < Date:_Z`0( UName of Agency Head I ase print): Onh AL1 '1 r j Title of Agency Head( ease print): C D t -n to 0i ;a �JY. J o Y- C Please indicate changes to Agency Information on lines provided on right. .o Current Information: Please do not erase or cover Information below. Indicate changes or additions on lines below., CAgency Name: Solid Waste Disposal District Indian River County j C Agency Head: Mr.Gary C.Wheeler 1 rA N Address: 1801 27th Street 4) Building A Q Vero Beach,Florida 32780 Section 257.36(5)(a),Florida Statutes',requires public agencies to designate a Records Management Liaison Officer (RMLO). Please indicate changes to RMLO Information on lines provided on right. If Current Information is blank,please Gdesignate an RMLO for your agency on lines provided on right. Current Information. Please do not erase or cover Information below. £ Indicateions on lines below: changes or additions G 0 `p RMLO: Ms. Darcy Vasilas �. Lie 15 C r RQ y m C Address: 1840-25th Street U) Q t Vero Beach,FL 32960-3365 Phone: (772)226-1433 Ext.: Email: dvasilas@ircgov.com r0 m ,section 257.36(5),Florida Statutes.'For the purposes of this section,the term'agency shall mean any state,county,district,or municipal officer,department,division, bureau,board,commission,or other separate unit of government created or established by haw. It Is the duty of each agency to:(a)Cooperate with the division in complying with the provisions of this chapter and designate a records management liaison officer.(b)Establish and maintain an active and continuing program for the economical and efficient management of records.' 2Rule 16-24.003(9),Ftodda Administrative Code:'Public records may be destroyed or otherwise disposed of only in accordance with retention schedules established by the Division.Photographic reproductions or reproductions through electronic recordkeeping systems may substitute for the original or paper copy,per Section 92.29,F.S., Photographic or electronic copies...Prior to records disposition,agencies must ensure that all retention requirements have been satisfied.For each record series being disposed of,agencies shall Identify and document the following:1.Records retention schedule number,2.Item number,3.Record series title;4.Inclusive dates of the records;5.Volume in cubic feet for paper records;for electronic records,record the number of bytes and/or records and/or files If known,or Indicate that the disposed records were In electronic form;and 6.Disposition action(manner of disposition)and date.' Please complete and return this compliance statement by December 31, 2014 (submit one copy only, please) to: Department of State Records Management Program, Mail Station 9E OR Email to: recmgt@dos.myflorida.com Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 39 RECEWED NOV'- 7 2014 w BOARD OF COUNT)' COMMISSION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RICK SCOTT Governor KEN DETZNER Secretary of State November 3, 2014 Ms. Laura E. Vasquez Indian River County Emergency Services District 1801 27th Street Building A Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365 Dear Ms. Vasquez: As a Florida public agency, you are required by Rule 1 B-24.003(] 1), Florida Administrative Code, to submit annually to the Division of Library and Infonnation Services, "a signed statement attesting to the agency's compliance with records disposition laws, rules, and procedures." Based on these annual statements, an annual report on statewide compliance is submitted to the Legislature and the Executive Office of the Governor for their consideration and action. For your convenience, we are providing the enclosed Records Management Compliance Statement to report your agency's compliance status. Please complete all information in Section I, the Compliance Certification, and make any necessary additions or corrections in Sections Il and II1. Please return one signed copy of the form (do not return this letter) to the mailing address or email address indicated at the bottom of the form by December 31, 2014. We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. If we can be of service to your agency, please do not hesitate to contact us at 850.245.6750, or by email at recmgt(ados.myflorida com. Sincerely, Gerard J. Clark, Bureau Chief, Archives and Records Management Division of Library and Information Services GJC/eg Enclosure Division of Library and Information Services R.A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street* Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.245.6600 • 850.245.6735 (Fax) info.florida.gov VIVA fIORIDA promoting Florida's History and Culture VivaFlorida.org t�..�40 ., RECORDS MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Fiscal Year 2013-2014 AgencylD: N0000164 1. This agency is in compliance with Section 257.36(5), Florida Statutes',and Rule 1 B-24.003(9), Florida Administrative Code2, for all public records regardless of media or format(e.g.,paper;electronic, including Oemail; microfilm;audio; video;etc.). VYes ❑ No(Unmarked responses will be recorded as not in compliance.) 2. This agency disposed of cubic feet of records during the fiscal year indicated above. _ 'C 3. This agency disposed of records in electronic form during the fiscal year indicated above. d O V Yes ❑ No(It is not necessary to indicate volume of electronic records disposed.) V G? d v 4. ❑ Check here if you wou like to be contacted for assistance. Indicate your questions/areas of concern on N the reverse side. f .a Agency Head Signature: Date: VName of Agency Head ease print): JQ-Sel h '1 t G� Title of Agency Head lease print): ,Q(Ari U] P )11 Ill 1St r-a�"0 Y OPlease indicate changes to Agency Information on lines provided on right. aCurrent Information: Please do not erase or cover information below. Indicate changes or additions on lines below: OC L. Agency Name: Indian River County Emergency Services District ` V C Agency Head: Mr.Peter D. O'Bryan �eA h 2)Lt21 r� ry N C Address: 1801 27th Street 4) Building A Q Vero Beach, Florida 32780 Section 257.36(5)(a), Florida Statutes', re uires public agencies to designate a Records Management Liaison Officer (RMLO). Please indicate changes to RMLO Information on lines provided on right. If Current Information is blank, please designate an RMLO for your agency on lines provided on right. Current Information: Please do not erase or cover information below. Indicate changes or additions on lines below: L..040 RMLO: Ms. Laura E.Vasquez /IfS E)OR 15 2- Address: 1801 27th Street d U) 0 Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 Phone: (772)226-1919 Ext.: Email: !vasquez@ircgov.com c Y`d V i rC.O YY) J 'Section 257.36(5),Florida Statutes:"For the purposes of this section,the term'agency'shall mean any state,county,district,or municipal officer,department,division, bureau,board,commission,or other separate unit of government created or established by law. It is the duty of each agency to:(a)cooperatewith the division in complying with the provisions of this chapter and designate a records management liaison officer.(b)Establish and maintain an active and continuing program for the economical and efficient management of records" 'Rule 1B-24.003(9),Florida Administrative Code:"Public records may be destroyed or otherwise disposed of only in accordance with retention schedules established by the Division.Photographic reproductions or reproductions through electronic recordkeeping systems may substitute for the original or paper copy,per Section 92.29,F.S., Photographic or electronic copies...Prior to records disposition,agencies must ensure that all retention requirements have been satisfied. For each record series being disposed of,agencies shall identify and document the following:1.Records retention schedule number;2.Item number;3.Record series title;4.Inclusive dates of the records;5.volume in cubic feet for paper records;for electronic records,record the number of bytes and/or records and/or files if known,or indicate that the disposed records were in electronic form;and 6.Disposition action(manner of disposition)and date' Please complete and return this compliance statement by December 31, 2014(submit one copy only, please)to: Department of State Records Management Program, Mail Station 9E OR Email to: recmgt@dos.myflorida.com Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 41 RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT NO. -- PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES 1. AGENCY NAME and ADDRESS 2. AGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) Indian River County Etta LoPresti Dept of Emergency Services 4225 43rd Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32967 (772) 226 - 3856 Ext. 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). ®a. Destruction ❑b. Microfilming and Destruction ❑c. Other 4. SUBMITTED BY: I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below,that any audit requirements for the✓ords have b n iu ly'jUsh ie and that further retention is t required for any litigation pending or imminent. t2 __sa La /V/ /tea er i%/ Signature Name and Title Date 5. LIST OF RECORD SERIES \ t, g. a. b. c. d. e. volume Disposition Schedule Item Title Retention Inclusive Ition an No. Na. Dates Cubic Date Feet Completed After GSl- 3 Administrative Convenience Records OSA ]999-2006 — Authorization SL Shr�Po� 256 Disaster Preparedness Drill Records OSA 2008 )O J1011 .10 Total 6. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed 7. DISPOSAL CERTIFI TE: The above listed records have been records is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. sposed of in man er and the date shown in column g. Signatur Date _ L.o st ian/Records Management Liai Offi r Dateame an lel Witne s --- 42 RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT ENO.1. F 1 PAGES AGENCY NAME and ADDR:I-ESS 2. AGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) Indian River County Rachel Ivey Department of Emergency Services 4225 43rd Ave. Vero Beach, FL 32967-1671 (772) 226 - 3859 Ext. 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). ❑a. Destruction ❑b. Microfilming and Destruction ®C. Other Scanned & Destruction 4. SUBMITTED BY: I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below,that any audit requirements for ds have been fully justified,and that further retention is not required for any litigation pending or imminent. Signa re Name and Title Date 6. LIST OF RECORD SE I i. 9. a. b. C. d e. Volume Disposition Schedule Item Tttle Retention Inclusive In n an No. No. Dates Cubic pots Feet Completed After GSI 52 Travel Records Authorization 5 FY FY 2012/13 SL 42 Purchasing Records-Copies 5 FY FY 2012/13 146 Transitory Messages-Paper OSA FY 2012/]3 i0+ol1 i3 17 Correspondence&Memorands: 3 FY FY 2012/13 Administrative 2 Administrative Convenience Records OSA FY 2012/13 3 Administrative Support Records OSA FY 2012/13 116 Attendance&Leave Records 3 FY FY 2012/13 265 Emergency Operations Records: 4 CY FY 2007/08 Applications GS8 70 Toxic Substances Lists 4 CY CY 2009 Total .50 6. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed 7. OSAL CERTIFICATE: The above listed records have been records is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. dis of in nd on the date shown in column g. ,L r Date _ T c� odia ecords Ma age t Liaison icer ate Nam Title tness 43 NO. RECORDS DISPOSITION DOCUMENT _ PAGE 1 OF I PAGES 1. AGENCY NAME and ADDRESS 2. AGENCY CONTACT (Name and Telephone Number) Indian River County Ellen Salm Department of Emergency Services Fire Rescue 4225 43" Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 3296'1 (772) 226 - 3665 Eat. 3. NOTICE OF INTENTION: The scheduled records listed in Item 5 are to be disposed of in the manner checked below(specify only one). ®a. Destruction ❑b. Microfilming and Destruction ❑c. Other 4. SUBMITTED BY:I hereby certify that the records to be disposed of are correctly represented below,that any audit requirements for the r s have been fully justified, that further retention is not required for any litigation pending or imminent. Signature Name and Title Date 5. LIST OF RECORD SERI f. 9- a. b. c d. e. Volume Disposition Schedule hem Trtle Retention Inclusive In Action and No. No. Dates Cubic QAg Feet Completed After Authorization GS4 80 Patient Medical Records 7 CY 2000-2003 2 nn GS4 127 Inventory Records:Drugs 2CY 1989-2005 1.5 GSI- 98 Disciplinary Case Files 5 CY 1994 -2003 2 SL \GSI- 139 Promotion/Transfer Records 4 CY 2000-2004 1.5 \ SL \ GSI- 24 Employment Application and Selection 2CY 2000-2004 2 SL Records GS8 46 Training Records: Student Evaluations 2CY 1990-2000 2 � (Finals) Total I 1 CF 6. DISPOSAL AUTHORIZATION: Disposal for the above listed 7. DISPOSAL CERTIFICATE: The above listed records have been records is authorized. Any deletions or modifications are indicated. is the man aid on the date shown in col n g. Signature Date 0 bs4l a� -�7 r''� L todian/Reoords Manages; 'a on ' er D to e and —� Witn s ----- - 44 INFORMATIONAL ITEM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ` INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Fitch Ratings Press Release Indian River County's 20 rie ater& Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds FROM: Jason E. Brown Director, Management & udge Attached is a copy of the January 26, 2015 press release from Fitch Ratings, which affirms Indian River County's `AAA' rating for the County's Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2009. This rating reflects the overall financial health of the County Utility. Key rating drivers for Fitch were strong debt coverage, low debt levels, conservative management, affordable rate structure and excellent financial profile. ATTACHMENT Fitch Ratings Press Release APPROVED AGE DA ITEM: A. BY: � Jo ph A. Baird County Administrator Indian River County Apprpved Date y Administrator FOR: February 10, 2015 County Attorney '•{J -K' Budget 3 Department Risk Management 45 FITCH AFFIRMS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL WATER & SEWER REVS AT 'AAA'; OUTLOOK STABLE Fitch Ratings-New York-26 January 2015: Fitch Ratings affirms its 'AAA' rating on the following Indian River County, FL (the county)revenue bonds: -421.3 million water and sewer system revenue refunding bonds, series 2009. The Rating Outlook is Stable. SECURITY The bonds are supported by the net revenues of the county's water and sewer system(the system). KEY RATING DRIVERS EXCELLENT FINANCIAL PROFILE: The system has produced over 2.Ox debt service coverage (DSC) for the past five years and has maintained excellent liquidity. Unaudited fiscal 2014 results show 2.3x DSC and nearly$36 million in unrestricted available cash,equating to approximately 830 days cash on hand. MINIMAL CAPITAL NEEDS, LOW DEBT: The system's capital improvement program (CIP) is limited and primarily addresses renewal and replacement (R&R) projects. Debt levels are low and are expected to decline further following the county's payment of existing and callable senior lien debt with cash in mid- calendar year 2015. CONSERVATIVE AND ATTENTIVE MANAGEMENT: The management team has many years of service and familiarity with the system and in the field and is conservative in their financial projections and budgeting practices. AFFORDABLE AND FLEXIBLE RATE STRUCTURE: The system has not increased rates since 1999 due to low population growth and wide operating margins.Though it has no plans to do so in the foreseeable future,the system is authorized to impose consumer price index adjustments if necessary. RATING SENSITIVITIES RATING STABILITY EXPECTED: The rating is sensitive to shifts in fundamental credit characteristics, including maintaining strong financial metrics and ensuring adequate capital investment. The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that such shifts are unlikely. CREDIT PROFILE Indian River County(implied unlimited tax general obligation rating of'AAA'by Fitch)is located on Florida's central Atlantic coast about 86 miles southeast of the city of Orlando. The county covers nearly 500 square miles and has a population of nearly 144,000. The economy is supported by construction,manufacturing, health care,tourism, educational services,retail, and distribution. STRONG CURRENT AND FUTURE FINANCIAL PROFILE 46 The system's financial performance has been historically solid, with above 2.Ox DSC consistently since 2009 and 2.6x DSC in fiscal 2013. The county's conservative management maintains this positive coverage level as well as substantial cash reserves in an effort to guarantee available cash for unforeseen system needs. Unaudited coverage for fiscal 2014 is expected to be 2.6x and near 2.Ox through fiscal 2019 according to a management-provided financial forecast. Based on historic performance and restrained capital and expenditure needs,Fitch expects that positive financial results will continue. Liquidity is extremely strong, with the system ending fiscal 2013 with more than $43 million in unrestricted cash, equivalent to nearly 1,000 days of operating expenses on hand. Unaudited fiscal 2014 results show a decline in cash to roughly$36 million as the system cash-funded a portion of the Osprey Marsh capital project. The fiscal 2014 cash balance nonetheless yielded roughly two years' worth of cash available for operations. LOW DEBT, MANAGEABLE CAPITAL NEEDS The system's low debt profile is a key credit strength. Debt per customer is just$589 in fiscal 2013, well below average compared to other similarly rated systems. Debt to net plant was also low at just 21% for the same period, and debt amortization is well above average with 100% of outstanding bonds retired within 10 years. Management has indicated that it will spend roughly $14 million in available cash to redeem a portion of its outstanding callable debt in 2015,reducing its overall burden going forward by 38%. Cash projections even after this payment remain robust. The county's modest four-year $13 million CIP will be funded equally by grants and existing cash. Historic capital spending since 2010 has been variable, with capital expenditures (CapEx) relative to the rate of annual depreciation averaging only 41% during that time. While Fitch views this level of CapEx as somewhat weak and possibly as an indicator of deferred maintenance, the system underwent substantial capital investment in 2008 to ensure long-term supply and capacity availability, and management has described the system's current and future capital needs as in R&R and growth accommodation stages, with several intermittent larger projects that are ably paid for with existing and growing cash. In addition, management restricts $3.5 million of cash annually solely for R&R so that resources are always available to meet capital needs as they may arise. Fitch is comfortable with the level of capital investment based on the system's abundance of available cash, ample debt- issuance capacity, and affordable rate structure that would allow for additional revenue growth if necessary. LOW CUSTOMER CHARGES The average residential customer bill of$60 for combined service assuming 7,000 gallons of use is affordable at 1.6%of median household income(MHI). Rates should stay competitive as the county has a very manageable capital program that is expected to be funded with cash and connection fees. Rates have not been raised since 1999, and though management has no plans to raise them in the financial forecast, it is entitled to do so per a rate resolution should the necessity arise. ABUNDANT WATER SUPPLY AND SOUND INFRASTRUCTURE The county's water and sewer system provides services to a mostly residential customer base of approximately 46,200 water, and 26,900 sewer accounts as of fiscal 2014. There is no customer concentration, and despite recent economic and housing market weakness, the county's mostly residential customer base has been relatively stable. Water is supplied through various wells from the Floridan Aquifer, with treatment provided by one of two county-owned treatment facilities. The water treatment plants have a combined 20.1 million gallons per day (mgd) of treatment capacity, which is more than sufficient to meet the system's 47 average daily demand in fiscal 2014 of 8.8 mgd. Water use is regulated by the St. Johns Water Management District through a consumptive use permit that expires in 2031. Management believes current supply sources will be capable of meeting the county's long-term demand through at least 2030. Wastewater is treated at one of four regional treatment plants, with a combined current treatment capacity of 12.9 mgd. Average daily flow for the system is just 4.5 mgd, leaving plenty of treatment capacity to meet future growth.Effluent is treated to 100%re-use standards,and as a result the county does not expect to face significant capital or other regulatory compliance costs related to numeric nutrient mandates for effluent discharged into local surface water. STABLE LOCAL ECONOMY The county's economy continues to see improvement following the economic downturn, categorized by higher consumer spending and increases in tax rolls, sales tax and building permit revenues, and a decline in foreclosure rates. The county's unemployment rate has declined to 7.8%as of September 2014,yet remained higher than that of the state (6.1%)and nation(5.7%). Finally, the county's MHI is around 10%lower than the state and 20%below the national average.However,individual poverty rates are slightly more favorable than the state and nation. Contact: Primary Analyst Eva D. Rippeteau Associate Director +1-212-908-9105 Fitch Ratings, Inc. 33 Whitehall Street New York,NY 10004 Secondary Analyst Andrew DeStefano Director +1-212-908-0284 Committee Chairperson Doug Scott Managing Director +1-512-215-3725 Media Relations: Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, Tel: +1 (212) 908 0526, Email: elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available at'www.fitchratings.com'. In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria,this action was additionally informed by information from Creditscope. Applicable Criteria and Related Research: --'Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria' (June 2014); --'U.S. Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Rating Criteria' (July 2012); --'2015 Water and Sewer Medians' (December 2014); --'2015 Outlook: Water and Sewer Sector' (December 2014). 48 Applicable Criteria and Related Research: U.S. Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Rating Criteria http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=715275 2015 Water and Sewer Medians http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_fram e.cfm?rpt_id=818409 2015 Outlook: Water and Sewer Sector http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=818410 Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=750012 ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATTNGS.COM/ UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE'CODE OF CONDUCT'SECTION OF THIS SITE.FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. 49 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court&Comptroller •`O°"'' Finance Department 1801 27'x'Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: January 15, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS January 9, 2015 to January 15, 2015 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of January 9, 2015 to January 15, 2015. Attachment: DB: MS 50 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT. 321456 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 109.97 321457 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 77.13 321458 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 63.72 321459 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 33.64 321460 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 69.80 321461 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 29.92 321462 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 15.73 321463 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 113.41 321464 1/15/2015 UTILREFUNDS 239.16 321465 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 14.34 321466 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 43.78 321467 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 48.12 321468 1/15/2015 UTILREFUNDS 41.91 321469 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 77.69 321470 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 50.29 321471 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 68.22 321472 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 71.21 321473 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 27.17 321474 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 74.38 321475 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 108.70 321476 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 34.96 321477 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 37.98 321478 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 32.46 321479 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 40.27 321480 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 19.44 321481 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 47.16 321482 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 33.64 321483 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 47.14 321484 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 84.35 321485 1/15/2015 UTEL REFUNDS 39.34 321486 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3.94 321487 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 56.11 321488 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 70.75 321489 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 120.82 321490 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 58.97 321491 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 43.78 321492 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 72 79 321493 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 2.69 321494 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 6 77 321495 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 40.68 321496 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 72.68 321497 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 42 88 321498 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 28.08 321499 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 44.88 321500 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 38.98 321501 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 45.60 321502 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 151.10 321503 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 57.49 321504 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 41.77 321505 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 45.51 321506 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 15.74 321507 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 15.80 321508 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 5.11 321509 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 670.48 321510 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 20.89 321511 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 67.95 321512 1/15/2015 UTIL.REFUNDS 74.38 321513 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 42.39 51 1 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321514 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 63.26 321515 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 1,079.12 321516 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 38.53 321517 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 32.46 321518 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 150.16 321519 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 46.30 321520 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 27.24 321521 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 31.05 321522 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 76.12 321523 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 65.07 321524 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3.24 321525 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 29.80 321526 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 67.07 321527 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 42.32 321528 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 26.91 321529 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 74.44 321530 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 5.68 321531 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 42.32 321532 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 110.85 321533 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 19.86 321534 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 52.87 321535 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 34.65 321536 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 70.44 321537 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 87.53 321538 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 33.33 321539 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 46.43 321540 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3.51 321541 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 65.19 321542 1/15/2015 UTILREFUNDS 27.38 321543 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 38.25 321544 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 63.05 321545 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 565.87 321546 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 78.32 321547 1/15/2015 UTEL REFUNDS 49.28 321548 1/15/2015 JORDAN MOWER INC 634.15 321549 1/15/2015 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 473.80 321550 1/15/2015 CHISHOLM CORP OF VERO 231.20 321551 1/15/2015 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 347.78 321552 1/15/2015 AT&T WIRELESS 1,104.16 321553 1/15/2015 AT&T WIRELESS 1,887.84 321554 1/15/2015 AT&T WIRELESS 100.00 321555 1/15/2015 LINDEN-BEALS CORP 489.38 321556 1/15/2015 SEWELL HARDWARE CO INC 12.62 321557 1/15/2015 DELTA SUPPLY CO 80.48 321558 1/15/2015 E-Z BREW COFFEE&BOTTLE WATER SVC 16.47 321559 1/15/2015 GRAINGER 162.87 321560 1/15/2015 KELLY TRACTOR CO 362.96 321561 1/15/2015 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 285.00 321562 1/15/2015 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 469.99 321563 1/15/2015 QUALITY BOOKS INC 10,792.92 321564 1/15/2015 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 891.66 321565 1/15/2015 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 1,003.80 321566 1/15/2015 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 1,125.48 321567 1/15/2015 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 1,426.92 321568 1/15/2015 DAILY COURIER SERVICE INC 2,284.50 321569 1/15/2015 GAYLORD BROTHERS INC 112.73 321570 1/15/2015 LFI FORT PIERCE INC 514.76 321571 1/15/2015 PARKSON CORPORATION 2,452.66 321572 1/15/2015 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 168.15 321573 1/15/2015 SWE INC 325.00 52 2 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321574 1/15/2015 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS,LTD 2,036.90 321575 1/15/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 393.45 321576 1/15/2015 PETES CONCRETE 1,300.00 321577 1/15/2015 EGP INC 222.56 321578 1/15/2015 SPORTSMANS SPECIALTY GROUP 254.93 321579 1/15/2015 TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC 589.73 321580 1/15/2015 FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE 351.92 321581 1/15/2015 ECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC 56,322.74 321582 1/15/2015 BARTH CONSTRUCTION INC 9,000.00 321583 1/15/2015 XEROX CORP SUPPLIES 233.46 321584 1/15/2015 GENERAL PART INC 985.26 321585 1/15/2015 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 789.68 321586 1/15/2015 BAKER&TAYLOR INC 4,659.40 321587 1/15/2015 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 690.80 321588 1/15/2015 MICROMARKETING LLC 393.96 321589 1/15/2015 GO COASTAL INC 170.50 321590 1/15/2015 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 111.15 321591 1/15/2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 19,662.23 321592 1/15/2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 768.15 321593 1/15/2015 CITY OF VERO BEACH 63,013.24 321594 1/15/2015 STEPHEN WOJTASZEK 41.21 321595 1/15/2015 BEST WESTERN 356.00 321596 1/15/2015 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 142.32 321597 1/15/2015 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 478.38 321598 1/15/2015 INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC 2,035.39 321599 1/15/2015 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 10.29 321600 1/15/2015 EBSCO INDUSTRIES INC 24.00 321601 1/15/2015 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 775.97 321602 1/15/2015 HUMANE SOCIETY 22,622.50 321603 1/15/2015 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 14.95 321604 1/15/2015 WAL MART STORES EAST LP 32.47 321605 1/15/2015 FLORIDA ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOC INC 70.00 321606 1/15/2015 AQUAGENIX 650.00 321607 1/15/2015 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC 288.92 321608 1/15/2015 DUMONT COMPANY INC 3,564.00 321609 1/15/2015 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 53,028.62 321610 1/15/2015 TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC 177,065.99 321611 1/15/2015 VERO HERITAGE INC 774.00 321612 1/15/2015 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 4,808.13 321613 1/15/2015 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 42,011.73 321614 1/15/2015 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 1,859.12 321615 1/15/2015 JAMES GRAY JR 350.00 321616 1/15/2015 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER INC 7,331.04 321617 1/15/2015 STATE ATTORNEY 9,641.67 321618 1/15/2015 CITY OF FELLSMERE 193.98 321619 1/15/2015 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC COOP INC 314.00 321620 1/15/2015 HIBISCUS CHILDRENS CENTER 2,500.00 321621 1/15/2015 STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES&CREMATORY 425.00 321622 1/15/2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTHY START 416.66 321623 1/15/2015 NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITERS INC 123.52 321624 1/15/2015 WALKER PROCESS EQUIPMENT 720.09 321625 1/15/2015 GREY HOUSE PUBLISHING 468.95 321626 1/15/2015 HENRY SMITH 144.00 321627 1/15/2015 CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FL 1,250.00 321628 1/15/2015 PAMELA COOPER 342.00 321629 1/15/2015 COMCAST 119.76 321630 1/15/2015 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 225.00 321631 1/15/2015 IDEA GARDEN ADVERTISING 150.00 321632 1/15/2015 SYMBIONT SERVICE CORP 163.00 321633 1/15/2015 HAYTH,HAYTH&LANDAU 125.00 53 3 CBECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321634 1/15/2015 GATOR'S SOD INC 150.00 321635 1/15/2015 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 468.91 321636 1/15/2015 CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 253.15 321637 1/15/2015 VAN WAL INC 66.00 321638 1/15/2015 PARGAS 484.25 321639 1/15/2015 CENTRAL PUMP&SUPPLY INC 635.69 321640 1/15/2015 DICKERSON FLORIDA INC 133,362.14 321641 1/15/2015 WHISPERING PALMS MHC LLC 979.70 321642 1/15/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 219.57 321643 1/15/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 222.55 321644 1/15/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 124.18 321645 1/15/2015 LARRY STEPHENS 90.00 321646 1/15/2015 CAROLE J MADIGAN 1,810.50 321647 1/15/2015 ARDAMAN&ASSOCIATES INC 80.00 321648 1/15/2015 1 ST FIRE&SECURITY INC 144.00 321649 1/15/2015 SESAC INC 1,171.00 321650 1/15/2015 PAK MAIL 52.60 321651 1/15/2015 COMMUNICATIONS BROKERS&CONSULTANTS INC 3.60 321652 1/15/2015 JOHNNY B SMITH 198.00 321653 1/15/2015 DANE MACDONALD 144.00 321654 1/15/2015 FLAHERTY,VICTORIA T 365.92 321655 1/15/2015 BRIAN FREEMAN 14.24 321656 1/15/2015 DOUGHERTY,JOHN F 50.00 321657 1/15/2015 TASER INTERNATIONAL INC 2,431.56 321658 1/15/2015 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 900.00 321659 1/15/2015 YOUTH GUIDANCE DONATION FUND 416.67 321660 1/15/2015 TRITEL INC 49.50 321661 1/15/2015 RAINBOW GROUP LLC 2,038.12 321662 1/15/2015 SANDYARACENA 75.00 321663 1/15/2015 VERA SMITH 36.00 321664 1/15/2015 KNAPHEIDE TRUCK EQUIPMENT SOUTHEAST 39.70 321665 1/15/2015 GLISSON&CO INC 1,020.00 321666 1/15/2015 INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC 1,050.50 321667 1/15/2015 CREATIVE POWER SOLUTIONS INC 575.00 321668 1/15/2015 ATLANTIC COASTAL LAND TITLE CO LLC 75.00 321669 1/15/2015 KEMPER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 3.59 321670 1/15/2015 JUNIOR LEAGUE OF INDIAN RIVER INC 2,500.00 321671 1/15/2015 BOULEVARD TIRE CENTER 1,080.78 321672 1/15/2015 LINDSEY GARDENS II LTD 500.00 321673 1/15/2015 SAFETY SCHELL CORPORATION 4,397.28 321674 1/15/2015 DELRAY MOTORS 130.71 321675 1/15/2015 OVERDRIVE INC 690.49 321676 1/15/2015 RAYMOND J DUCHEMIN 75.00 321677 1/15/2015 ANYTHING UNDER THE STARS INC 400.00 321678 1/15/2015 JMC SERVICES INC 390.10 321679 1/15/2015 JOSHUA GHIZ 377.75 321680 1/15/2015 CLEAN SWEEP&VAC LLC 4,372.80 321681 1/15/2015 REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC 5.76 321682 1/15/2015 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 1,257.31 321683 1/15/2015 LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC 6,722.88 321684 1/15/2015 CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC 756.09 321685 1/15/2015 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES INC 2,792.55 321686 1/15/2015 ALEX MIKLO 198.00 321687 1/15/2015 MITCHELL GODWIN 144.00 321688 1/15/2015 TRV ADVERTISTING&MARKETING INC 1,193.00 321689 1/15/2015 BURNETT LIME CO INC 6,444.20 321690 1/15/2015 SOUTHWIDE INDUSTRIES INC 7,794.37 321691 1/15/2015 IMPECCABLE SIGNS INC 504.00 321692 1/15/2015 AMERICAN MINORITY BUSINESS FORMS 474.98 321693 1/15/2015 COMMERCIAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,674.01 54 4 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321694 1/15/2015 US NETSERVICES LLC 297.50 321695 1/15/2015 KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN 138.40 321696 1/15/2015 C E R SIGNATURE CLEANING 5,850.00 321697 1/15/2015 DEBORAH CUEVAS 144.00 321698 1/15/2015 BSN SPORTS INC 2,732.18 321699 1/15/2015 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION 1,162.33 321700 1/15/2015 SAMBA HOLDINGS INC 1,110.64 321701 1/15/2015 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY 9.66 321702 1/15/2015 SHERRY L RALEIGH-ADAMS 1,160.90 321703 1/15/2015 AXIS DATA SOLUTIONS INC 1,374.54 321704 1/15/2015 SBL FREIGHTLINER LLC 69,713.00 321705 1/15/2015 INTERCON SOLUTIONS INC 3,719.00 321706 1/15/2015 ANDREW D.FLEISHER,ESQ 150.00 321707 1/15/2015 LANGHAM CONSULTING SERVICES INC 2,340.00 321708 1/15/2015 BIWATERAEWT INC 388.00 321709 1/15/2015 MINDY RENNARD,ESQ. 1,281.92 321710 1/15/2015 GIVING KIDZ A CHANCE INC 1,666.66 321711 1/15/2015 FLORIDA PALLET LLC 475.00 321712 1/15/2015 IMAGE ACCESS INC 1,505.00 321713 1/15/2015 COBRA GOLF INCORPORATED 5,627.25 321714 1/15/2015 ODBS ENTERPRISES LLC 2,625.00 321715 1/15/2015 RICHARD KUSSEROW 479.00 321716 1/15/2015 ROBERTS J PACI 795.63 321717 1/15/2015 LARRY& SANDRA LARSON 435.00 321718 1/15/2015 MARIO HENDERSON 9.43 321719 1/15/2015 JOHN J POPULAR II 3,762.38 321720 1/15/2015 REBECCA HALL 300.00 321721 1/15/2015 BRIAN GUANCH 10.32 321722 1/15/2015 BENJAMIN DEBLIECK 50.00 321723 1/15/2015 SWANA FLORIDA SUNSHINE CHAPTER INC 100.00 321724 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 42.67 321725 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 23.74 321726 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 58.18 321727 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 49.75 321728 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 41.23 321729 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 37.20 321730 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 72.01 321731 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 10.32 321732 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 53.60 321733 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 100.00 321734 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 31.65 321735 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 81.95 321736 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 40.54 321737 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 39.76 321738 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 75.32 321739 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 1.90 321740 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 39.04 321741 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 2.71 321742 1/15/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 96.03 Grand Total: 837,353.98 55 5 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS.NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1005580 1/12/2015 AT&T 60.37 1005581 1/12/2015 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 93.51 1005582 1/12/2015 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 1,675.78 1005583 1/12/2015 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 307.39 1005584 1/12/2015 SSES INC DBA 0.00 1005585 1/12/2015 SUB AQUATICS INC 535.50 1005586 1/12/2015 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 408.00 1005587 1/12/2015 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 11,206.42 1005588 1/12/2015 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 119.85 1005589 1/12/2015 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 244.32 1005590 1/12/2015 PRIDE ENTERPRISES 164.51 1005591 1/12/2015 STRYKER SALES CORP 2,428.98 1005592 1/12/2015 SHRIEVE CHEMICAL CO 2,858.47 1005593 1/12/2015 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 2,248.55 1005594 1/12/2015 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 353.68 1005595 1/12/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 538.28 1005596 1/12/2015 WACO FILTERS CORPORATION 12,018.00 1005597 1/12/2015 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 112.85 1005598 1/12/2015 CM&S INDUSTRIES INC 995.00 1005599 1/12/2015 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 172.05 1005600 1/12/2015 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 289.80 1005601 1/12/2015 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 933.75 1005602 1/12/2015 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 3,772.40 1005603 1/12/2015 DAVIDSON TITLES INC 6,495.51 1005604 1/12/2015 MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 1,728.07 1005605 1/12/2015 MORNING STAR PERSONILIZED APPAREL INC 90.20 1005606 1/12/2015 THE EXPEDITER 601.45 1005607 1/12/2015 GROVE WELDERS INC 284.61 1005608 1/12/2015 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 1,293.69 1005609 1/12/2015 CENGAGE LEARNING CORPORATION 124.96 1005610 1/12/2015 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 984.04 1005611 1/12/2015 DYNAMIC BRANDS LLC 207.60 1005612 1/12/2015 L&L DISTRIBUTORS 7.60 1005613 1/12/2015 S&S AUTO PARTS 87.34 1005614 1/12/2015 IMAGENET CONSULTING LLC 58.00 1005615 1/14/2015 COPYCOINC 183.71 1005616 1/14/2015 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 145.59 1005617 1/14/2015 RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICE 4,800.00 1005618 1/14/2015 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 3,396.84 1005619 1/14/2015 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY CO 37.20 1005620 1/14/2015 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE LTD 369.41 1005621 1/14/2015 DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING&TESTING 7,762.50 1005622 1/14/2015 PRIDE ENTERPRISES 23.00 1005623 1/14/2015 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC 267.54 1005624 1/14/2015 COMPLETE ELECTRIC INC 540.00 1005625 1/14/2015 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 78.06 1005626 1/14/2015 COPYTRONICS INC 1,256.01 1005627 1/14/2015 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 309.41 1005628 1/14/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 257.66 1005629 1/14/2015 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 104.25 Grand Total: 73,031.71 56 1 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 3379 1/9/2015 : WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC 21,212.97 3380 1/9/2015 R J SULLIVAN CORP 32,381.95 3381 1/9/2015 VETERANS COUNCIL OF I R C 6,946.60 3382 1/12/2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER 23,057.75 3383 1/12/2015 IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 8,734.11 3384 1/13/2015 1 R C HEALTH INSURANCE-TRUST 449,984.52 Grand Total: 542,317.90 57 1 �3 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court&Comptroller Finance Department - '? 1801 27`h Streets Vero Beach, FL 32960 �+.�M• TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIRECT THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: January 22, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS January 16, 2015 to January 22, 2015 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of January 16, 2015 to January 22, 2015. Attachment: DB: MS 58 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321743 1/22/2015 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 1,020.74 321744 1/22/2015 JORDAN MOWER INC 236.87 321745 1/22/2015 TEN-8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 296.29 321746 1/22/2015 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC 603.40 321747 1/22/2015 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 506.50 321748 1/22/2015 MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT LLC 749.99 321749 1/22/2015 RICOH USA INC 110.82 321750 1/22/2015 AT&T WIRELESS 557.80 321751 1/22/2015 PARALEE COMPANY INC 400.00 321752 1/22/2015 E-Z BREW COFFEE&BOTTLE WATER SVC 31.45 321753 1/22/2015 KELLY TRACTOR CO 438.27 321754 1/22/2015 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 527,035.02 321755 1/22/2015 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 38.76 321756 1/22/2015 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 823.56 321757 1/22/2015 HACH CO 1,010.56 321758 1/22/2015 LFI FORT PIERCE INC 567.75 321759 1/22/2015 KSM ENGINEERING&TESTING INC 193.00 321760 1/22/2015 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD 11,796.44 321761 1/22/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 419.95 321762 1/22/2015 SCHULKE BITTLE& STODDARD LLC 2,091.25 321763 1/22/2015 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS INC 1,425.00 321764 1/22/2015 EGP INC 449.12 321765 1/22/2015 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 1,102.36 321766 1/22/2015 BRODART COMPANY 564.54 321767 1/22/2015 ACE PLUMBING INC 228.00 321768 1/22/2015 EXPRESS REEL GRINDING INC 2,000.00 321769 1/22/2015 FLORIDA VETERINARY LEAGUE 34.00 321770 1/22/2015 TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC 995.00 321771 1/22/2015 FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE 1,275.56 321772 1/22/2015 GENERAL PART INC 1,757.79 321773 1/22/2015 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 298.60 321774 1/22/2015 SIGNS IN A DAY 150.00 321775 1/22/2015 BAKER&TAYLOR INC 546.53 321776 1/22/2015 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 263.80 321777 1/22/2015 MICROMARKETING LLC 228.39 321778 1/22/2015 K&M ELECTRIC SUPPLY 296.55 321779 1/22/2015 NEWSBANK INC 3,603.50 321780 1/22/2015 PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC 769.48 321781 1/22/2015 PST SERVICES INC 23,568.26 321782 1/22/2015 CITY OF VERO BEACH 40,670.16 321783 1/22/2015 INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC 1,252.38 321784 1/22/2015 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 37.27 321785 1/22/2015 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 120.80 321786 1/22/2015 FLORIDA FIRE MARSHALS&INSPECTORS 260.00 321787 1/22/2015 ACUSHNET COMPANY 172.06 321788 1/22/2015 INDIAN RIVER HABITAT 213.40 321789 1/22/2015 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DISTRICT 595.00 321790 1/22/2015 WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 291.00 321791 1/22/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS 11.40 321792 1/22/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS 30.20 321793 1/22/2015 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 700.00 321794 1/22/2015 TREASURE COAST COUNCIL OF LOCAL 200.00 321795 1/22/2015 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 61.38 321796 1/22/2015 UNITED BLOWER INC 5,924.00 321797 1/22/2015 SUBSTANCE AWARENESS COUNCIL OF IRC INC 28,286.69 321798 1/22/2015 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 16,420.01 321799 1/22/2015 WELLER POOLS LLC 67,386.00 321800 1/22/2015 JAMES GRAY JR 63.80 59 1 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321801 1/22/2015 PUBLIC DEFENDER 3,817.80 321802 1/22/2015 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE COAST 23,229.50 321803 1/22/2015 CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PALM BCH 2,166.67 321804 1/22/2015 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC 449.85 321805 1/22/2015 STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES&CREMATORY 425.00 321806 1/22/2015 JOSEPH A BAIRD 170.00 321807 1/22/2015 THE ROOF AUTHORITY 31,995.00 321808 1/22/2015 COX GIFFORD SEAWINDS 425.00 321809 1/22/2015 CORY RICHTER 61.33 321810 1/22/2015 FLORIDA STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION 551.25 321811 1/22/2015 TREASURE COAST FIRE CHIEFS 150.00 321812 1/22/2015 BE SAFE SECURITY ALARMS INC 239.70 321813 1/22/2015 HENRY SMITH 108.00 321814 1/22/2015 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL INC 4,002.51 321815 1/22/2015 AIRGAS CARBONIC INC 2,868.31 321816 1/22/2015 TIM GEIB 50.00 321817 1/22/2015 BRIDGE DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC 4,131.00 321818 1/22/2015 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 500.00 321819 1/22/2015 CHRISTOPHER KAFER 4.65 321820 1/22/2015 CAROLINA SOFTWARE INC 500.00 321821 1/22/2015 FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 65.00 321822 1/22/2015 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 678.30 321823 1/22/2015 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 1,334.61 321824 1/22/2015 FLORIDA DEPT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE 20,200.96 321825 1/22/2015 RACHEL IVEY 114.22 321826 1/22/2015 VAN WAL INC 969.00 321827 1/22/2015 JOSEPH W VASQUEZ 126.00 321828 1/22/2015 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 122.00 321829 1/22/2015 MICHAEL THIELE 52.95 321830 1/22/2015 OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER 397.67 321831 1/22/2015 CENTRAL PUMP& SUPPLY INC 156.62 321832 1/22/2015 E W SIVER&ASSOCIATES INC 6,100.00 321833 1/22/2015 MASTELLER&MOLER INC 5,190.00 321834 1/22/2015 DICKERSON FLORIDA INC 388,273.25 321835 1/22/2015 MANUEL PINERA 398.33 321836 1/22/2015 STANLEY CONSULTANTS INC 3,591.78 321837 1/22/2015 LARRY STEPHENS 90.00 321838 1/22/2015 SUPREME INTERNATIONAL LLC 277.90 321839 1/22/2015 ANDY SOBCZAK 40.00 321840 1/22/2015 JOHNNY SMITH 162.00 321841 1/22/2015 DANE MACDONALD 54.00 321842 1/22/2015 GATES HOUSE ENTERPRISES LLC 86.95 321843 1/22/2015 JAMES A COUTTS 39.42 321844 1/22/2015 TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC 197.01 321845 1/22/2015 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 660.00 321846 1/22/2015 NICOLACE MARKETING INC 3,203.00 321847 1/22/2015 NEW YORK METS/ST LUCIE METS 500.00 321848 1/22/2015 EQ THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMPANY 10,821.40 321849 1/22/2015 TRITEL INC 49.50 321850 1/22/2015 CENTEX HOMES 3,128.90 321851 1/22/2015 SANDY ARACENA 50.00 321852 1/22/2015 VERA SMITH 54.00 321853 1/22/2015 DAILY DOSE CAFE 158.00 321854 1/22/2015 WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC 438.00 321855 1/22/2015 GUETTLER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC 653,749.57 321856 1/22/2015 BOULEVARD TIRE CENTER 3,642.66 321857 1/22/2015 MURPHY&WALKER P L 8,238.46 321858 1/22/2015 DELRAY MOTORS 25.78 321859 1/22/2015 FLORIDA COAST EQUIPMENT INC 3,031.03 321860 1/22/2015 OVERDRIVE INC 156.91 60 2 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321861 1/22/2015 FCC ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 156.81 321862 1/22/2015 FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC 7,733.33 321863 1/22/2015 RAYMOND J DUCHEMIN 50.00 321864 1/22/2015 FBM HOLDINGS LLC 397.00 321865 1/22/2015 SOUTHEASTERN SECURITY CONSULTANTS INC 185.00 321866 1/22/2015 GFA INTERNATIONAL INC 472.00 321867 1/22/2015 NEWSOM OIL COMPANY 1,274.90 321868 1/22/2015 MICHAEL PIERCE 500.00 321869 1/22/2015 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 2,272.76 321870 1/22/2015 LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC 1,624.32 321871 1/22/2015 ALEX MIKLO 90.00 321872 1/22/2015 MITCHELL GODWIN 54.00 321873 1/22/2015 BURNETT LIME CO INC 3,221.40 321874 1/22/2015 ERIN BASKINS 39.52 321875 1/22/2015 TREASURE COAST TURF INC 1,216.00 321876 1/22/2015 PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC 98.75 321877 1/22/2015 STRAIGHT OAK LLC 176.16 321878 1/22/2015 CALDWELL PACETTI EDWARDS 1,507.50 321879 1/22/2015 MARK BAER 1,000.00 321880 1/22/2015 KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN 1,028.97 321881 1/22/2015 DEBORAH CUEVAS 108.00 321882 1/22/2015 RYAN HERCO PRODUCTS CORP 2,447.96 321883 1/22/2015 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION 2,503.67 321884 1/22/2015 CONSTANCE TAIBI-LEWIS 35.00 321885 1/22/2015 RDW QUALITY BUILDERS LLC 10,800.00 321886 1/22/2015 EXTREME GOLF INC 589.00 321887 1/22/2015 TRINOVA-FLORIDA INC 5,982.58 321888 1/22/2015 VALERIE WATERS 200.00 321889 1/22/2015 AXIS DATA SOLUTIONS INC 16,385.11 321890 1/22/2015 DIAMOND MOWERS INC 54,744.00 321891 1/22/2015 BERNARD EGAN&COMPANY 3,497.58 321892 1/22/2015 STS MAINTAIN SERVICES INC 1,750.00 321893 1/22/2015 ADY VOLTEDGE 9,500.00 321894 1/22/2015 ALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 950.00 321895 1/22/2015 A CROSS LAW PA 3,181.60 321896 1/22/2015 SKECHERS USA INC 55.10 321897 1/22/2015 MAVERICK UNITED ELEVATOR LLC 1,480.00 321898 1/22/2015 FLORIDA PALLET LLC 475.00 321899 1/22/2015 RELIANT FIRE SYSTEMS INC 1,742.23 321900 1/22/2015 PAMELA S SLECKITIS 398.82 321901 1/22/2015 RICHARD KUSSEROW 479.00 321902 1/22/2015 SOUTHERN STRATEGY GROUP OF ORLANDO LLC 5,000.00 321903 1/22/2015 KB HOME JACKSONVILLE LLC 7,627.49 321904 1/22/2015 W2007 EQUITY INNS REALY LLC 378.00 321905 1/22/2015 ROBERT GALLAGHER 65.00 321906 1/22/2015 C M CRAWFORD ARCHITECT INC 75.00 321907 1/22/2015 BONAFIDE PROPERTIES 67.08 321908 1/22/2015 COLE CREDIT PROPERTY TRUST IV INC 11,241.07 321909 1/22/2015 VINCENT L SCIOLA 399.35 321910 1/22/2015 RAY JONES 359.32 321911 1/22/2015 ANA R REYES 353.52 321912 1/22/2015 CAROLE D SPAHR 430.54 321913 1/22/2015 CYNTHIA D YARBOROUGH 398.14 321914 1/22/2015 DORIS LEE 20.00 Grand Total: 2,110,468.78 61 3 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 3385 1/15/2015 GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA 262,676.30 3386 1/16/2015 FL SDU 7,734.36 3387 1/16/2015 1CMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION 9,849.88 3388 1/16/2015 NACO/SOUTHEAST 21,710.65 3389 1/16/2015 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION 2,060.00 3390 1/16/2015 NACO/SOUTHEAST 488.19 3391 1/16/2015 FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES,INC 5,578.69 3392 1/16/2015 IRC FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC 5,970.00 3393 1/16/2015 BENEFITS WORKSHOP 8,341.10 3394 1/16/2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 507.50 3395 1/16/2015 VEROTOWN LLC 5,490.69 3396 1/16/2015 SCHOOL DISTRICT OF I R COUNTY 80,766.00 3397 1/16/2015 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION#769 5,402.50 3398 1/20/2015 IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 388,292.52 3399 1/21/2015 VEROTOWN LLC 12,822.24 Grand Total: 817,690.62 62 1 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS. NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1005630 1/19/2015 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 515.62 1005631 1/19/2015 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST LLC 345.45 1005632 1/19/2015 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 1,572.45 1005633 1/19/2015 HENRY SCHEIN INC 10,167.60 1005634 1/19/2015 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 313.03 1005635 1/19/2015 HELENA CHEMICAL 978.40 1005636 1/19/2015 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 195.79 1005637 1/19/2015 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 142.90 1005638 1/19/2015 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 264.70 1005639 1/19/2015 DEMCOINC 382.37 1005640 1/19/2015 DAVIDSON TITLES INC 5,757.90 1005641 1/19/2015 MIKES GARAGE& WRECKER SERVICE INC 1,095.00 1005642 1/19/2015 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 232.96 1005643 1/19/2015 RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICE 45.00 1005644 1/19/2015 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 151.25 1005645 1/19/2015 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 5,199.65 1005646 1/19/2015 IRRIGATION CONSULTANTS UNLIMITED INC 113.73 1005647 1/19/2015 GROVE WELDERS INC 72.66 1005648 1/19/2015 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 1,015.97 1005649 1/19/2015 VERO COLLISION CENTER 519.04 1005650 1/19/2015 CENGAGE LEARNING CORPORATION 648.75 1005651 1/19/2015 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY CO 9.99 1005652 1/19/2015 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 4,613.10 1005653 1/19/2015 PRIDE ENTERPRISES 19.50 1005654 1/19/2015 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC 189.54 1005655 1/19/2015 GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC 481.44 1005656 1/19/2015 SHRIEVE CHEMICAL CO 2,966.72 1005657 1/19/2015 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO 305.00 1005658 1/19/2015 RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 127.61 1005659 1/19/2015 FLAGLER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LLC 634.73 1005660 1/19/2015 SYNAGRO-WWT INC 28,908.98 1005661 1/19/2015 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 314.52 1005662 1/19/2015 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 419.34 1005663 1/19/2015 METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 2,171.61 1005664 1/19/2015 MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS INC 21,757.20 1005665 1/19/2015 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 297.55 1005666 1/19/2015 FOXCROFT EQUIPMENT AND SERVICE COMPANT LLC 747.74 1005667 1/19/2015 S&S AUTO PARTS 578.39 1005668 1/19/2015 STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC 195.00 1005669 1/19/2015 HYDRA SERVICE(S)INC 10,916.74 1005670 1/19/2015 HORIZON DISTRIBUTORS INC 80.88 1005671 1/19/2015 IMAGENET CONSULTING LLC 173.98 1005672 1/21/2015 HARRIS SANITATION INC 79,637.64 1005673 1/21/2015 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES INC 102.00 1005674 1/21/2015 AT&T 11,643.15 1005675 1/21/2015 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 487.49 1005676 1/21/2015 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 3,811.04 1005677 1/21/2015 WHEELABRATOR RIDGE ENERGY INC 5,939.80 Grand Total: 207,260.90 63 1 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court&Comptroller Finance Department > 1801 27`'Street C, Vero Beach,FL 32960 `%.�«•' TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: January 29, 2015 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS January 23, 2015 to January 29, 2015 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of January 23, 2015 to January 29, 2015. Attachment: DB: MS 64 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321915 1/23/2015 PETER OBRYAN 180.52 321916 1/23/2015 TIM ZORC 410.90 321917 1/29/2015 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 65,917.59 321918 1/29/2015 JORDAN MOWER INC 537.31 321919 1/29/2015 TEN-8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 2,239.91 321920 1/29/2015 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 285.35 321921 1/29/2015 VELDE FORD INC 2,589.27 321922 1/29/2015 AT&T WIRELESS 197.18 321923 1/29/2015 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC 1,489.70 321924 1/29/2015 SEWELL HARDWARE CO INC 28.12 321925 1/29/2015 DELTA SUPPLY CO 77.40 321926 1/29/2015 E-Z BREW COFFEE& BOTTLE WATER SVC 6.49 321927 1/29/2015 KELLY TRACTOR CO 3,042.26 321928 1/29/2015 GENES AUTO GLASS INC 220.00 321929 1/29/2015 COCA COLA REFRESHMENTS USA INC 185.76 321930 1/29/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY CO 52.36 321931 1/29/2015 MY RECEPTIONIST INC 326.64 321932 1/29/2015 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 49.40 321933 1/29/2015 AMERICAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 139.00 321934 1/29/2015 AMERICAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 1,236.56 321935 1/29/2015 HACH CO 1,142.44 321936 1/29/2015 LFI FORT PIERCE INC 1,230.13 321937 1/29/2015 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 424.60 321938 1/29/2015 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD 4,403.24 321939 1/29/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 166.29 321940 1/29/2015 PETES CONCRETE 850.00 321941 1/29/2015 EGP INC 937.93 321942 1/29/2015 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 53.81 321943 1/29/2015 ACE PLUMBING INC 328.25 321944 1/29/2015 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC 492.29 321945 1/29/2015 TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC 1,262.64 321946 1/29/2015 CALL ONE INC 216.00 321947 1/29/2015 DELL MARKETING LP 577.45 321948 1/29/2015 GENERAL PART INC 1,150.09 321949 1/29/2015 BAKER&TAYLOR INC 494.00 321950 1/29/2015 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 63.97 321951 1/29/2015 NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC 128.70 321952 1/29/2015 TY COBB SERVICE INC 18,500.00 321953 1/29/2015 GREENE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP LTD 3,306.25 321954 1/29/2015 EDITH WILLIAMS 500.00 321955 1/29/2015 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD 500.00 321956 1/29/2015 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 3,586.00 321957 1/29/2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 44,543.41 321958 1/29/2015 MEDICAL EXAMINERS OFFICE 24,888.58 321959 1/29/2015 VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 5,568.58 321960 1/29/2015 ROGER J NICOSIA 1,500.00 321961 1/29/2015 CITY OF VERO BEACH 9,220.82 321962 1/29/2015 CITY OF VERO BEACH 2,052.23 321963 1/29/2015 CITY OF VERO BEACH 11,662.50 321964 1/29/2015 STEPHEN WOJTASZEK 33.71 321965 1/29/2015 HAPPY SOFTWARE INC 8,429.00 321966 1/29/2015 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 142.32 321967 1/29/2015 UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1,279.14 321968 1/29/2015 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 22.08 321969 1/29/2015 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND 7,889.46 321970 1/29/2015 NAN MCKAY AND ASSOCIATES INC 224.00 321971 1/29/2015 LIVINGSTON PAGE 270.00 321972 1/29/2015 B/C B/S OF FL ADM FEE 33,416.55 65 1 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 321973 1/29/2015 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 524.64 321974 1/29/2015 FLORIDA FISH& WILDLIFE 7,033.60 321975 1/29/2015 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES 400.00 321976 1/29/2015 PERCONTI DATA SYSTEMS INC 48,000.00 321977 1/29/2015 MARRIOTT FT LAUDERDALE NORTH 465.00 321978 1/29/2015 ACUSHNET COMPANY 3,653.83 321979 1/29/2015 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE INC 85,581.00 321980 1/29/2015 FLORIDA WATER&POLLUTION CONTROL 30.00 321981 1/29/2015 EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE 4,610.76 321982 1/29/2015 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC 428.48 321983 1/29/2015 DUMONT COMPANY INC 265.75 321984 1/29/2015 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DISTRICT 100.00 321985 1/29/2015 CITY OF SEBASTIAN 19,974.93 321986 1/29/2015 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 32.73 321987 1/29/2015 TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC 186,560.01 321988 1/29/2015 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 670.82 32]989 1/29/2015 SUBSTANCE AWARENESS COUNCIL IRC INC 1,640.00 321990 1/29/2015 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 127,854.71 321991 1/29/2015 PHILLIP J MATSON 120.33 321992 1/29/2015 BASIL D DANCY 548.20 321993 1/29/2015 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER INC 7,239.00 321994 1/29/2015 STATE ATTORNEY 8,661.12 321995 1/29/2015 CITY OF FELLSMERE 22.92 321996 1/29/2015 JOSEPH A BAIRD 463.19 321997 1/29/2015 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 50.00 321998 1/29/2015 FLORIDA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 300.00 321999 1/29/2015 TREASURE COAST SPORTS COMMISSION INC 5,422.28 322000 1/29/2015 COX GIFFORD SEAWINDS 425.00 322001 1/29/2015 BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOC OF FLORIDA 50.00 322002 1/29/2015 CHANNING BETE CO INC 444.90 322003 1/29/2015 BELA NAGY 828.95 322004 1/29/2015 UNITED HEALTH CARE INS COMPANY 345.61 322005 1/29/2015 HENRY SMITH 126.00 322006 1/29/2015 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF 102.00 322007 1/29/2015 DOUBLETREE HOTEL 695.00 322008 1/29/2015 PETTY CASH 33.29 322009 1/29/2015 WESTSIDE REPROGRAPHICS OF VERO BEACH INC 83.79 322010 1/29/2015 GOVERNORS HURRICANE CONFERENCE 200.00 322011 1/29/2015 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD 625.14 322012 1/29/2015 COMCAST 97.85 322013 1/29/2015 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 868.00 322014 1/29/2015 HAYTH,HAYTH&LANDAU 125.00 322015 1/29/2015 GATOR'S SOD INC 150.00 322016 1/29/2015 ST LUCIE COUNTY BOCC 104,767.25 322017 1/29/2015 TRANE US INC 6,840.00 322018 1/29/2015 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 401.96 322019 1/29/2015 VAN WAL INC 10.00 322020 1/29/2015 JOSEPH W VASQUEZ 162.00 322021 1/29/2015 FLORIDA RURAL LEGAL SERVICES INC 2,047.21 322022 1/29/2015 ALAN HILL 251.02 322023 1/29/2015 ELIGHA L PRYOR JR 450.00 322024 1/29/2015 JOHNS EASTERN COMPANY INC 8,668.11 322025 1/29/2015 MBV ENGINEERING INC 8,125.00 322026 1/29/2015 MICHAEL ZITO 88.87 322027 1/29/2015 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOUSING AND 431.25 322028 1/29/2015 MASTELLER&MOLER INC 51,328.00 322029 1/29/2015 STAPLES CONTRACT&COMMERCIAL INC 398.17 322030 1/29/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 218.95 322031 1/29/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 221.92 322032 1/29/2015 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 123.83 66 2 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 322033 1/29/2015 BETTY STRICKLAND 90.35 322034 1/29/2015 LARRY STEPHENS 108.00 322035 1/29/2015 ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTY MGMT 11 INC 2,600.00 322036 1/29/2015 LINDA GRACE CORFIELD 500.00 322037 1/29/2015 ARJUNA WERAGODA 68.00 322038 1/29/2015 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 884.45 322039 1/29/2015 ANDY SOBCZAK 300.00 322040 1/29/2015 JOHNNY B SMITH 108.00 322041 1/29/2015 DANE MACDONALD 180.00 322042 1/29/2015 FISHER&PHILLIPS LLP 16,405.25 322043 1/29/2015 INDIAN RIVER RDA LP 454.00 322044 1/29/2015 REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC 2,525.81 322045 1/29/2015 BRIAN FREEMAN 43.96 322046 1/29/2015 GUARDIAN COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 750.00 322047 1/29/2015 LAZY J LLC 616.00 322048 1/29/2015 INDIAN RIVER DONUTS, INC 1,001.60 322049 1/29/2015 DOLAN,ROBERT&MARTHA 471.11 322050 1/29/2015 SOUTHEAST SECURE SHREDDING 97.12 322051 1/29/2015 TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC 149.10 322052 1/29/2015 EVERYTHING OUTDOORS WHOLESALE 1,619.50 322053 1/29/2015 NICOLACE MARKETING INC 1,759.04 322054 1/29/2015 FLORIDA MEDICAID 282.36 322055 1/29/2015 VERA SMITH 72.00 322056 1/29/2015 DAILY DOSE CAFE 158.00 322057 1/29/2015 YAMAHA GOLF CAR COMPANY 324.39 322058 1/29/2015 HEALTH ADVOCATE 1,103.85 322059 1/29/2015 WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC 91.50 322060 1/29/2015 BOULEVARD TIRE CENTER 122.50 322061 1/29/2015 TRACKER SOFTWARE CORPORATION 4,649.00 322062 1/29/2015 DELRAY MOTORS 9.36 322063 1/29/2015 OVERDRIVE INC 3,494.11 322064 1/29/2015 MHG TALLAHASSEE AL LP 328.00 322065 1/29/2015 DAVID SCHRYVER 255.00 322066 1/29/2015 JOSHUA GHIZ 3,267.41 322067 1/29/2015 AMERICAN MESSAGING SERVICES LLC 18.17 322068 1/29/2015 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 760.63 322069 1/29/2015 LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC 5,609.76 322070 1/29/2015 CB&1 COASTAL PLANNING&ENGINEERING INC 12,091.41 322071 1/29/2015 CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC 160.26 322072 1/29/2015 ALEX MIKLO 108.00 322073 1/29/2015 MITCHELL GODWIN 144.00 322074 1/29/2015 BURNETT LIME CO INC 6,363.00 322075 1/29/2015 TREASURE COAST TURF INC 1,521.00 322076 1/29/2015 PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC 30.00 322077 1/29/2015 AVMED HMO 370.40 322078 1/29/2015 OAC ACTION CONSTRUCTION CORP 43,127.82 322079 1/29/2015 DEBORAH CUEVAS 54.00 322080 1/29/2015 COURSE TRENDS INC 300.00 322081 1/29/2015 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION 2,507.52 322082 1/29/2015 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY 9.66 322083 1/29/2015 AXIS DATA SOLUTIONS INC 1,349.22 322084 1/29/2015 DESIGNER CONCRETE COUNTERS LLC 990.00 322085 1/29/2015 BERNARD EGAN&COMPANY 691.60 322086 1/29/2015 INTERCON SOLUTIONS INC 10,748.55 322087 1/29/2015 ANDREW D. FLEISHER, ESQ 150.00 322088 1/29/2015 EAST COAST VETERINARY SERVICES LLC 118.00 322089 1/29/2015 INTEGRITY LAWNS LLC 1,750.00 322090 1/29/2015 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 16,270.08 322091 1/29/2015 FOUNDATION FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING 308.00 322092 1/29/2015 MINDY RENNARD,ESQ. 313.66 67 3 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 322093 1/29/2015 FAIRWAY STONE LTD 640.00 322094 1/29/2015 MICHAEL A HAYES 96.51 322095 1/29/2015 COLLEEN HEAGY 384.32 322096 1/29/2015 DONNA HUGHES 50.00 322097 1/29/2015 HERBERT KIPNIS 99.95 322098 1/29/2015 CAROL LINK 82.33 322099 1/29/2015 STUART/MARTIN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 125.00 322100 1/29/2015 AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL FOUNDATION 10,002.84 322101 1/29/2015 RANDOLPH DANCE 219.18 322102 1/29/2015 NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY 11217.82 322103 1/29/2015 LLOYD G COOKSEY 44.66 322104 1/29/2015 MARIANNA HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,212.56 322105 1/29/2015 JULIANA E YOUNG 2,436.00 322106 1/29/2015 TERRENCE R MARTIN 68.36 322107 1/29/2015 DEBRA MCKEEVER 525.00 322108 1/29/2015 NANCY J REA 40.36 322109 1/29/2015 STEPHEN G NEILL 3,307.50 322110 1/29/2015 DAVID WALSH&ASSOC REAL ESTATE 500.00 322111 1/29/2015 AMY ROSATI 35.00 322112 1/29/2015 MARY BAKER 515.60 322113 1/29/2015 BLANCA M CAPUTE 502.40 322114 1/29/2015 ELIZABETH DUNCAN 97.66 322115 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 19.29 322116 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 35.19 322117 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 33.14 322118 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 37.12 322119 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 34.90 322120 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 187.87 322121 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 141.16 322122 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 19.79 322123 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 11.60 322124 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 60.19 322125 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 55.76 322126 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 66.39 322127 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 34.93 322128 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 70.13 322129 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 43.28 322130 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 37.91 322131 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 97.14 322132 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 21.72 322133 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 37.25 322134 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 12.15 322135 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 35.48 322136 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 30.40 322137 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 68.06 322138 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 27.93 322139 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 4.36 322140 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 14.30 322141 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 18.14 322142 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 17.44 322143 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 42.04 322144 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 75.72 322145 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 39.70 322146 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 76.49 322147 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 18.27 322148 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 58.38 322149 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 5.80 322150 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 39.62 322151 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 5.77 322152 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 38.49 68 4 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 322153 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 87.00 322154 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 32.32 322155 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 64.28 322156 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 17.32 322157 1/29/2015 FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 300.00 322158 1/29/2015 FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 300.00 322159 1/29/2015 FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 300.00 322160 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 3.90 322161 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 24.82 322162 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 24.99 322163 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 51.43 322164 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 80.10 322165 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 68.06 322166 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 45.22 322167 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 40.28 322168 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 65.70 322169 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 680.19 322170 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 39.30 322171 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 2.55 322172 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 87.63 322173 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 88.57 322174 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 43.13 322175 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 34.90 322176 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 46.70 322177 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 18.77 322178 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 7.89 322179 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 52.07 322180 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 38.49 322181 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 37.62 322182 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 272.40 322183 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 39.47 322184 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 92.02 322185 1/29/2015 UTIL REFUNDS 359.20 322186 1/29/2015 PAUL CARONE 3,688.00 322187 1/29/2015 PAUL JULIN 650.00 322188 1/29/2015 LINDSEY GARDENS LTD 309.00 322189 1/29/2015 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD 440.00 322190 1/29/2015 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 1,405.00 322191 1/29/2015 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 1,540.00 322192 1/29/2015 DAVID SPARKS 388.00 322193 1/29/2015 INDIAN RIVER INVESTMENT REALTY INC 481.00 322194 1/29/2015 THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH 454.00 322195 1/29/2015 ED SCHLITT LC 660.00 322196 1/29/2015 JOHN OLIVIERA 698.00 322197 1/29/2015 ARTHUR PRUETT 409.00 322198 1/29/2015 JOSEPH LOZADA 1,212.00 322199 1/29/2015 LUCY B HENDRICKS 573.00 322200 1/29/2015 HFB OF FLORIDA LLC 613.00 322201 1/29/2015 EARRING POINT PROPERTIES 469.00 322202 1/29/2015 ANDRE DORAWA 630.00 322203 1/29/2015 PAULA WHIDDON 553.00 322204 1/29/2015 COURTYARD VILLAS OF VERO LLC 560.00 322205 1/29/2015 JAMES W DAVIS 288.00 322206 1/29/2015 NITA EZELL 480.00 322207 1/29/2015 LINDSEY GARDENS 11 LTD 520.00 322208 1/29/2015 MISS INC OF THE TREASUE COAST 2,358.00 322209 1/29/2015 DANIEL CORY MARTIN 2,787.00 322210 1/29/2015 CRAIG LOPES 350.00 322211 1/29/2015 PAULA ROGERS&ASSOCIATES INC 650.00 322212 1/29/2015 FIVE STAR PROPERTY HOLDING LLC 797.00 69 5 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 322213 1/29/2015 WILLIAM LEE 1,264.00 322214 1/29/2015 MARK BAER 23,497.00 322215 1/29/2015 33 MILES EAST INVESTMENTS LLC 567.00 322216 1/29/2015 FRESH START HOUSING LLC 948.00 322217 1/29/2015 SABEL CHASE 478.00 322218 1/29/2015 ROBERTS J GORMAN 424.00 322219 1/29/2015 JUAN CHAVES 700.00 322220 1/29/2015 REID REALTY 478.00 322221 1/29/2015 THE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF VERO BEACH FLORID/ 2,830.00 322222 1/29/2015 MELISSA CAMARATA 581.00 322223 1/29/2015 FOUNDATION FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING 623.00 322224 1/29/2015 JOHNATHON KNOWLES 634.00 322225 1/29/2015 INDIANTOWN NON-PROFIT HOUSING INC 1,062.00 Grand Total: 1,207,179.73 70 6 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS. NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1005678 1/22/2015 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 296.40 1005679 1/22/2015 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 43.45 1005680 1/22/2015 COPYCO INC 24.96 1005681 1/22/2015 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 39.89 1005682 1/22/2015 JOHN DEERE COMPANY 82,656.40 1005683 1/22/2015 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 22.90 1005684 1/22/2015 WIGINTON CORP 989.00 1005685 1/22/2015 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 69.40 1005686 1/22/2015 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC 1,635.66 1005687 1/22/2015 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 1,545.14 1005688 1/22/2015 COPYTRONICS INC 761.20 1005689 1/22/2015 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 197.16 1005690 1/22/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 235.74 1005691 1/22/2015 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 160.67 1005692 1/22/2015 STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC 495.00 1005693 1/22/2015 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 8,697.20 1005694 1/22/2015 XYLEM WATER SOLUTION USA INC 12,996.80 1005695 1/23/2015 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 81.74 1005696 1/23/2015 METAL CULVERTS 5,913.92 1005697 1/23/2015 HELENA CHEMICAL 2,563.00 1005698 1/23/2015 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 710.85 1005699 1/23/2015 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 81.25 1005700 1/23/2015 DAVIDSON TITLES INC 1,225.24 1005701 1/23/2015 MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 2,747.00 1005702 1/23/2015 THE EXPEDITER 225.41 1005703 1/23/2015 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1,700.00 1005704 1/23/2015 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 138.50 1005705 1/23/2015 FLAGLER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LLC 521.06 1005706 1/23/2015 GRESSCO LTD 1,098.00 1005707 1/23/2015 METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 699.95 1005708 1/23/2015 S&S AUTO PARTS 223.06 1005709 1/23/2015 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS INC 658.32 1005710 1/26/2015 AT&T 1,717.01 1005711 1/26/2015 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 294.43 1005712 1/28/2015 AT&T 11,500.00 1005713 1/28/2015 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 382.60 1005714 1/29/2015 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST LLC 30.69 1005715 1/29/2015 COPYCOINC 33.80 1005716 1/29/2015 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 481.61 1005717 1/29/2015 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 143.28 1005718 1/29/2015 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 346.34 1005719 1/29/2015 RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICE 7,150.00 1005720 1/29/2015 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 1,050.00 1005721 1/29/2015 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 5,304.04 1005722 1/29/2015 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 845.84 1005723 1/29/2015 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 7,622.44 1005724 1/29/2015 WIGINTON CORP 483.00 1005725 1/29/2015 CENGAGE LEARNING CORPORATION 303.32 1005726 1/29/2015 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY CO 23.09 1005727 1/29/2015 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 883.76 1005728 1/29/2015 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF INC 1,214.40 1005729 1/29/2015 TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC 178.50 1005730 1/29/2015 HD SUPPLY FACILITIES MAINTENANCE LTD 116.35 1005731 1/29/2015 RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 707.59 1005732 1/29/2015 SYNAGRO-WWT INC 28,747.10 1005733 1/29/2015 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 58.32 1005734 1/29/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 167.70 1005735 1/29/2015 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 408.00 71 1 TRANS. NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1005736 1/29/2015 XYLEM WATER SOLUTION USA INC 5,787.00 1005737 1/29/2015 CM&S INDUSTRIES INC 2,409.85 Grand Total: 207,844.33 72 2 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 3400 1/22/2015 BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL& BERKON 3,074.28 3401 1/22/2015 IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 327.20 3402 1/23/2015 R J SULLIVAN CORP 33,645.20 3403 1/26/2015 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER 236,791.64 Grand Total: 273,838.32 73 1 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA •.�o��;, Clerk of Circuit Court&Comptroller Finance Department • 1801 27h Street ' Vero Beach, FL 32960 Telephone: (772)226-1945 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Diane Bernardo, Finance Director ffjf}' THRU: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and ComptrollerP DATE: January 23, 2015 U ' SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter Ending 12/31/2014 BACKGROUND Attached to this memorandum is the composition of the investment portfolio and investment earnings for the first quarter of this fiscal year. This report was reviewed by our investment advisory committee on January 22, 2015. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the attached Quarterly Investment Report. Indian River County Approyed Date Administrator County Attorne Bud et z$ Department Risk Management 74 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court&Comptroller A ` Finance Department 1801 27`h Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Telephone: (772)226-1945 Indian River County Investment Advisory Committee Quarterly Investment Report October 1, 2014 through December 31,2014 INVESTMENT POLICY In accordance with Section 218.415, Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners adopted an Investment Policy to govern the investment of county funds by the Clerk of the Circuit Court. The Policy states the primary objectives of investment activities are to preserve capital and to provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash flow needs of the county. Investment returns are secondary to the requirements for safety and liquidity. INVESTMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE An Investment Advisory Committee meets quarterly to review the previous quarter's investment activities, evaluate current and future liquidity needs, recommend investment strategies. The Committee consists of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, Finance Director, Internal Auditor, Budget Director, and three qualified citizens with investment or financial management expertise. The individuals who have agreed to serve are: David W. Griffis, Senior Vice President with Northern Trust Bank of Florida; Ted Libby, Senior Portfolio Manager with Cypress Capital Group; Andy Beindorf, Executive Vice President with CenterState Bank. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS As permitted by the Investment Policy, funds were invested only in the following types of investments: Federal Farm Credit Banks bonds and discount notes(FFCB), Federal Home Loan Banks bonds and discount notes(FHLB), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation bonds and discount notes(FHLMC), Federal National Mortgage Association bonds and discount notes(FNMA), Treasury Notes and Bills, State of Florida Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund(SBA)(for existing funds only), Florida Local Government Investment Trust(FLGIT), Other intergovernmental investment pool authorized pursuant to the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act as provided in F.S. 163.01, Certificates of Deposit(CDs), Money Market Funds, Repurchase Agreements. BOND PROCEEDS INVESTMENT The current bond reserve is placed with Bank of New York/Mellon and is currently invested in short-term treasury bills and agencies. 75 INVESTMENT ACTIVITY As of December 31, 2014 the investments portfolio book value was $325,886,096 with a market value of $325,900,938. Of the $325,886,096, portfolio total, $272,561,810 is restricted for the following purposes: $ 72,454,290 Special revenue projects $ 5,801,784 Debt payments for county bonds $ 55,240,925 Capital projects $ 136,149,053 Business-type activities $ 2,915,758 Escrow Funds $ 272,561,810 TOTAL RESTRICTED CASH BY FUND TYPE (PERCENTAGES) Special Escrow Revenue 1% 27% Debt Service 2% Business- Capital Type Projects 49% 21 i The weighted average maturity of the investments as of December 31, 2014 is 11 months. Yields on the individual investments ranged from 0.07% to 1.00%. The overall average yield for the quarter was 0.35%. Information on investment activity, total cash flows, interest earnings, and charts providing additional information regarding the investment of surplus funds such as the portfolio composition and maturity distribution are attached. The attached schedules list the portfolio composition and activity for the quarter ending December 31, 2014: Schedule 1 Portfolio sorted by type of debt instrument Schedule 2 Portfolio sorted by maturity date Schedule 3 Portfolio by maturity date bar graph Schedule 4 Portfolio by type pie chart Schedule 5 Investment purchases, calls and maturities for the quarter Schedule 6 Summary of cash flows and balances by month Schedule 7 Interest earnings summary Schedule 8 Allocation of investments by fund types (unrestricted and restricted balances) 76 Schedule 1 Indian River County,Florida Board of County Commissioners Investments By Type December 31,2014 Coupon/ Purchase Maturity Years To Yield To Original 12/31/14 Portfolio 2/31/14Portfolio Investment Type CUSIP Yield Date Date Maturity Maturity Par Amount Book Value % FFCB Bullet 3133ECFJ8 0.250% 02/14/13 01/30/15 0.08 0.250% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133ECEC4 0.280% 02/04/13 02/04/15 0.10 0.280% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133EC5Q3 0.330% 12/03/12 03/16/15 0.21 0.330% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133EC4A9 0.300% 11/23/12 04/15/15 0.29 0.300% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Disc 313312ER7 0.070% 10/29/14 04/22/15 0.31 0.070% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,270.83 FFCB Bullet 3133ECNU4 0.220% 05/06/13 05/06/15 0.35 0.220% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133EC6F6 0.350% 12/05/13 06/01/15 0.42 0.350% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133ED4A7 0.375% 10/07/13 10/07/15 0.77 0.375% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133ED6J6 0.350% 11/04/13 11/04/15 0.84 0.350% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Callable 3133EDGM8 0.350% 03/10/14 03/10/16 1.19 0.350% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133EDEC2 0.550% 01/28/14 04/28/16 1.33 0.550% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133EDMN9 0.375% 06/02/14 06/02/16 1.42 0.375% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Callable 3133EDGH9 0.430% 03/06/14 06/06/16 1.43 0.430% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Callable 3133EEAEO 0.680% 10/30/14 01/30/17 2.08 0.680% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 28,000,000.00 $ 27,999,270.83 8.76% FHLB Disc 313384AJ8 0.140% 01/22/14 01/09/15 0.02 0.140% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,893.33 FHLB Disc 313384DZ9 0.070% 10/26/14 04/06/15 0.26 0.070% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,381.67 FHLB Bullet 3130A2FT8 0.125% 08/06/14 06/19/15 0.47 0.150% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,567.02 FHLB Callable 3130A23M6 0.450% 06/17/14 06/17/16 1.46 0.450% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 313OA15F1 0.500% 03/27/14 06/27/16 1.49 0.500% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB-1X Call 3130ASEN4 0.500% 04/15/14 07/15/16 1.54 0.500% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 3130A2TR7 0.600% 08/26/14 08/26/16 1.65 0.600% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 3130A24J2 0.520% 06/12/14 09/12/16 1.70 0.520% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 3130A35Z3 0.800% 10/14/14 10/14/16 1.79 0.800% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB-1X Call 3130A3GX6 0.750% 11/24/14 02/24/17 2.15 0.750% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB-1X Call 3130A3PZ1 1.000% 12/30/14 06/30/17 2.50 1.000% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 24,000,000.00 $ 23,994,842.02 7.51% FHLMC Disc 313396DK6 0.010% 08/13/14 03/23/15 0.22 0.100% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,766.67 FHLMC Disc 313396NG48 0.170% 11/19/14 10/22/15 0.81 0.173% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,996,817.22 FHLMC Callable 3134G53J2 0.550% 05/20/14 05/20/16 1.39 0.550% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMCCallable 3134G4UW6 0.500% 02/27/14 05/27/16 1.41 0.500% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMC-1X Call 3134G4YR3 0.550% 04/08/14 07/08/16 1.52 0.550% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 3134G5C29 0.600% 07/22/14 07/22/16 1.56 0.600% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 3134G5HA6 0.700% 09/19/14 09/19/16 1.72 0.700% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMC-1X Call 3134G5NY7 0.750% 11/28/14 02/28/17 2.16 0.750% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 3134G5Q81 0.850% 12/10/14 03/10/17 2.19 0.850% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 3134GSSF3 0.850% 12/24/14 03/24/17 2.23 0.850% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 22,000,000.00 $ 21,995,583.89 6.88% FNMA Disc 313588CG62 0.080% 08/07/14 03/04/15 0.17 0.080% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,071.11 FNMA Disc 313588CX14 0.095% 08/12/14 03/11/15 0.19 0.095% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,886.39 FNMA Disc 313588GQ27 0.065% 11/07/14 06/08/15 0.44 0.065% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,230.83 FNMA Disc 313588HE8 0.070% 10/31/14 06/22/15 0.47 0.071% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,090.00 FNMA Disc 313588HN8 0.070% 10/31/14 06/30/15 0.50 0.071% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,058.89 FNMA Disc 313588HW85 0.075% 11/07/14 07/08/15 0.52 0.075% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,987.50 FNMA Disc 313588HW85 0.110% 11/14/14 08/06/15 0.60 0.112% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,380.56 FNMA Disc 313588HW85 0.120% 11/14/14 09/08/15 0.69 0.120% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,013.33 $ 16,000,000.00 $ 15,990,718.61 5.00% Treasury Note 912828RZ5 0.250% 12/06/12 01/15/15 0.04 0.254% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,765.63 Treasury Note 912828RZ5 0.250% 11/20/12 01/15/15 0.04 0.254% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,765.70 Treasury Note 912828UK40 0.250% 01/31/13 01/31/15 0.08 0.260% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,401.94 Treasury Note 912828SE1 0.250% 11/16/12 02/15/15 0.13 0.274% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,359.38 Treasury Note 912828SE1 0.250% 12/06/12 02/15/15 0.13 0.261% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,296.88 Treasury Note 912828UP37 0.250% 02/28/13 02/28/15 0.16 0.250% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828UT58 0.250% 04/01/13 03/31/15 0.25 0.250% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,999.97 Treasury Note 912828UY4 0.125% 04/30/13 04/30/15 0.33 0.210% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,994,913.35 Treasury Note 912828UY4 0.125% 12/13/13 04/30/15 0.33 0.210% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,996,484.38 Treasury Note 912828SU5 0.250% 12/06/12 05/15/15 0.37 0.269% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,593.75 Treasury Note 912828SU5 0.250% 11/29/12 05/15/15 0.37 0.291% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,996,953.13 Treasury Note 912828VD97 0.250% 05/03/13 05/31/15 0.41 0.260% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,401.94 Treasury Note 912828TD2 0.250% 12/06/12 07/15/15 0.54 0.280% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,997,656.25 Treasury Note 912828TD2 0.125% 11/28/12 07/15/15 0.54 0.305% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,664.10 Treasury Note 912828VN7 0.250% 12/20/13 07/31/15 0.58 0.260% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,531.25 1of2 77 Schedule 1 Indian River County,Florida Board of County Commissioners Investments By Type December 31,2014 12/31/14 Coupon/ Purchase Maturity Years To Yield To Original Portfolio Investment Type CUSIP Yield Date Date Maturity Maturity Par Amount Book Value % Treasury Note 912828TK6 0.250% 12/14/12 08/15/15 0.62 0.316% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,994,726.56 Treasury Note 912828TK6 0.250% 12/21/12 08/15/15 0.62 0.333% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,993,437.50 Treasury Note 912828VU1 0.375% 09/03/13 08/31/15 0.67 0.375% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828TP5 0.250% 02/08/13 09/15/15 0.71 0.333% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,993,554.50 Treasury Note 912828TP5 0.250% 02/21/13 09/15/15 0.71 0.336% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,993,437.50 Treasury Note 912828VY35 0.250% 09/30/13 09/30/15 0.75 0.328% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,312.50 Treasury Note 912828TT7 0.250% 12/11/13 10/15/15 0.79 0.271% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,828.13 Treasury Note 912828WB2 0.250% 10/31/13 10/31/15 0.83 0.302% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,997,000.00 Treasury Note 912828WB2 0.250% 12/13/13 10/31/15 0.83 0.300% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,997,070.31 Treasury Note 912828UG3 0.375% 12/20/13 01/15/16 1.04 0.377% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,882.81 Treasury Note 912828641 0.375% 01/31/14 01/31/16 1.08 0.375% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828UMO 0.375% 12/30/13 02/15/16 1.13 0.393% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,828.13 Treasury Note 9128281382 0.250% 12/15/14 02/29/16 1.16 0.300% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,125.00 Treasury Note 9128281382 0.250% 12/05/14 02/29/16 1.16 0.263% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,531.25 Treasury Note 912828682 0.250% 02/28/14 02/29/16 1.16 0.320% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,816.74 Treasury Note 912828U57 0.375% 12/30/13 03/15/16 1.21 0.428% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,996,484.38 Treasury Note 912828040 0.375% 03/31/14 03/31/16 1.25 0.450% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,525.20 Treasury Note 912828UW8 0.250% 12/10/14 04/15/16 1.29 0.337% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,997,656.25 Treasury Note 912828UW8 0.250% 02/28/14 04/15/16 1.29 0.372% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,992,148.44 Treasury Note 912828VC1 0.250% 02/28/14 05/15/16 1.37 0.397% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,990,156.25 Treasury Note 912828WM87 0.375% 05/31/14 05/31/16 1.42 0.375% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,999.89 Treasury Note 912828WQ91 0.500% 06/30/14 06/30/16 1.50 0.500% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828WX43 0.500% 07/31/14 07/31/16 1.58 0.523% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,628.97 Treasury Note 912828D64 0.500% 12/05/14 08/31/16 1.67 0.500% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828D64 0.500% 09/02/14 08/31/16 1.67 0.510% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,405.23 Treasury Note 9128281`47 0.500% 12/05/14 09/30/16 1.75 0.528% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,980.00 Treasury Note 912828F47 0.500% 09/30/14 09/30/16 1.75 0.565% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,996,127.39 Treasury Note 912828F88 0.375% 12/05/14 10/31/16 1.84 0.574% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,992,500.00 Treasury Note 912828674 0.625% 12/04/14 02/15/17 2.13 0.650% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,997,656.25 $ 129,000,000.00 $ 128,886,606.83 40.33% Regions Bank Money Market $26,101,101.59 8.17% TD Bank Money Market $30,038,881.60 9.40% Bank United Money Market $30,085,434.49 9.41% Harbor Community Bank CD $3,023,416.91 0.95% Total Unrestricted General Cash&Equivalents $308,115,856.77 Restricted Cash-Landfill FACC--Florida Local Govt Investment Trust-Landfill Closure&Postclosure Reserves-adjusted for fair mkt value $11,460,726.07 3.59% Total Pooled Cash&Equivalents $319,576,582.84 100.00% Restricted Cash-Health Insurance Wells Fargo-BCBS Claims Account $752,692.46 Citibank-BCBS Imprest Acct $84,000.00 Total Restricted Cash-Health Insurance $836,692.46 Restricted Cash-Bond Covenants(held by BNY/Mellon) Fidelity Institutional Treasury Money Market-Utilities Debt Service Reserve $18,034.26 N/A Treasury Note 912828VHO 0.375% 07/01/13 06/30/15 0.50 0.375% $1,592,000.00 $1,592,114.70 Treasury Note 912828A67 0.250% 12/31/13 12/31/15 1.00 0.357% $1,365,000.00 $1,364,786.72 Treasury Note 912828WQ9 0.500% 06/30/14 06/30/16 1.50 0.500% $1,470,000.00 $1,470,459.64 Treasury Note 912828G46 0.500% 12/01/14 11/30/16 1.92 0.530% $1,030,000.00 $1,027,425.00 Total Restricted Cash-adjusted for fair market value $5,472,820.32 Total Portfolio $325,886,095.62 Note:See separate investment report for OPEB funds. 2of2 78 Schedule 2 Indian River County,Florida Board of County Commissioners Investment By Maturity Date December 31,2014 Coupon/ Purchase Maturity Years To Yield To Original 12/31/14 Investment Type CUSIP Yield Date Date Maturity Maturity Par Amount Book Value Mo Cash Flow FHLB Disc 313384AJB 0.140% 01/22/14 01/09/15 0.02 0.142% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,893.33 Treasury Note 912828RZ5 0.250% 12/06/12 01/15/15 0.04 0.254% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,765.63 Treasury Note 912828RZ5 0.250% 11/20/12 01/15/15 0.04 0.254% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,765.70 FFCB Bullet 3133ECFJ8 0.250% 02/14/13 01/30/15 0.08 0.250% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828UK4 0.250% 01/31/13 01/31/15 0.08 0.260% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,401.94 $ 14,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133ECEC4 0.280% 02/04/13 02/04/15 0.10 0.280% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828SE1 0.250% 11/16/12 02/15/15 0.13 0.274% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,359.38 Treasury Note 912828SE1 0.250% 12/06/12 02/15/15 0.13 0.261% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,296.88 Treasury Note 912828UP37 0.250% 02/28/13 02/28/15 0.16 0.250% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 11,000,000.00 FNMA Disc 313588CQ6 0.080% 08/07/14 03/04/15 0.17 0.080% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,071.11 FNMA Disc 313588CX14 0.095% 08/12/14 03/11/15 0.19 0.095% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,886.39 FFCB Bullet 3133EC543 0.330% 12/03/12 03/16/15 0.21 0.330% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Disc 313396DK6 0.100% 08/13/14 03/23/15 0.22 0.100% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,766.67 Treasury Note 912828UT58 0.250% 04/01/13 03/31/15 0.25 0.250% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,999.97 $ 11,000,000.00 FHLB Disc 313384DZ9 0.070% 10/29/14 04/06/15 0.26 0.070% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,381.67 FFCB Bullet 3133EC4A9 0.300% 11/23/12 04/15/15 0.29 0.300% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Disc 313312ER7 0.070% 10/29/14 04/22/15 0.31 0.070% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,270.83 Treasury Note 912828UY4 0.125% 04/30/13 04/30/15 0.33 0.210% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,994,913.35 Treasury Note 912828UY4 0.125% 12/13/13 04/30/15 0.33 0.210% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,996,484.38 $ 12,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133ECNU4 0.220% 05/06/13 05/06/15 0.35 0.220% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828SU5 0.250% 12/06/12 05/15/15 0.37 0.269% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,593.75 Treasury Note 912828SU5 0.250% 11/29/12 05/15/15 0.37 0.291% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,996,953.13 Treasury Note 912828VD9 0.250% 05/03/13 05/31/15 0.41 0.260% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,401.94 $ 11,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133EC6F6 0.350% 12/05/13 06/01/15 0.42 0.350% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FNMA Disc 313588GQ27 0.065% 11/07/14 06/08/15 0.44 0.065% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,230.83 FHLB Bullet 3130A2FT8 0.125% 08/06/14 06/19/15 0.47 0.150% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,567.02 FNMA Disc 313S88HE8 0.070% 10/31/14 06/22/15 0.47 0.071% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,090.00 FNMA Disc 313588HN8 0.070% 10/31/14 06/30/15 0.50 0.071% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,999,058.89 $ 10,000,000.00 FNMA Disc 313588HW85 0.075% 11/07/14 07/08/15 0.52 0.075% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,987.50 Treasury Note 912828TD2 0.250% 12/06/12 07/15/15 0.54 0.281% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,997,656.25 Treasury Note 912828TD2 0.250% 11/28/12 07/15/15 0.54 0.305% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,664.10 Treasury Note 912828VN7 0.250% 12/20/13 07/31/15 0.58 0.260% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,531.25 $ 11,000,000.00 FNMA Disc 313588KB02 0.110% 11/14/14 08/06/15 0.60 0.112% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,380.56 Treasury Note 912828TK6 0.250% 12/14/12 08/15/15 0.62 0.316% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,994,726.56 Treasury Note 912828TK6 0.250% 12/21/12 08/15/15 0.62 0.333% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,993,437.50 Treasury Note 912828VU1 0.375% 09/03/13 08/31/15 0.67 0.375% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 11,000,000.00 FNMA Disc 313588LL74 0.120% 11/14/14 09/08/15 0.69 0.120% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,013.33 Treasury Note 912828TP5 0.250% 02/08/13 09/15/15 0.71 0.333% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,993,554.50 Treasury Note 912828TP5 0.250% 02/21/13 09/15/15 0.71 0.336% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,993,437.50 Treasury Note 912828VY35 0.250% 09/30/13 09/30/15 0.75 0.328% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,312.50 $ 11,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133ED4A7 0.375% 10/07/13 10/07/15 0.77 0.375% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828TT7 0.250% 12/11/13 10/15/15 0.79 0.271% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,828.13 FHLMC Disc 313396NG48 0.170% 11/19/14 10/22/15 0.81 0.173% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,996,817.22 Treasury Note 912828WB2 0.250% 10/31/13 10/31/15 0.83 0.300% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,997,000.00 Treasury Note 912828WB2 0.250% 12/13/13 10/31/15 0.83 0.302% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,997,070.31 $ 13,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133ED6J6 0.350% 11/04/13 11/04/15 0.84 0.350% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828UG3 0.375% 12/20/13 01/15/16 1.04 0.377% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,882.81 Treasury Note 912828841 0.375% 01/31/14 01/31/16 1.08 0.375% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 6,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828UM0 0.375% 12/30/13 02/15/16 1.13 0.393% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,828.13 Treasury Note 912828B82 0.250% 12/15/14 02/29/16 1.16 0.300% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,125.00 Treasury Note 912828882 0.250% 12/05/14 02/29/16 1.16 0.263% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,531.25 Treasury Note 912828B82 0.250% 02/28/14 02/29/16 1.16 0.320% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,816.74 $ 12,000,000.00 FFCB Callable 3133EDGM8 0.350% 03/10/14 03/10/16 1.19 0.350% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828US7 0.375% 12/30/13 03/15/16 1.21 0.428% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,996,484.38 Treasury Note 912828C40 0.375% 03/31/14 03/31/16 1.25 0.450% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,995,525.20 $ 8,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828UW8 0.250% 02/28/14 04/15/16 1.29 0.372% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,992,148.44 Treasury Note 912828UW8 0.250% 12/10/14 04/15/16 1.29 0.337% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,997,656.25 FFCB Bullet 3133EDEC2 0.550% 01/28/14 04/28/16 1.33 0.550% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 7,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828VC1 0.250% 02/28/14 05/15/16 1.37 0.397% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,990,156.25 FHLMC Callable 3134G53J2 0.550% 05/20/14 05/20/16 1.39 0.5SO% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 3134G4UW6 0.500% 02/27/14 05/27/16 1.41 0.500% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828WM87 0.375% 05/31/14 05/31/16 1.42 0.375% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,999.89 $ 10,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 3133EDMN9 0.375% 06/02/14 06/02/16 1.42 0.375% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FFCB Callable 3133EDGH9 0.430% 03/06/14 06/06/16 1.43 0.430% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 3130A23M6 0.450% 06/17/14 06/17/16 1.46 0.450% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 3130A15F1 0.500% 03/27/14 06/27/16 1.49 0.500% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828WQ91 0.500% 06/30/14 06/30/16 1.50 0.500% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 11,000,000.00 FHLMC-1X Call 3134G4YR3 0.550% 04/08/14 07/08/16 1.52 0.550% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLB-1X Call 3130A1EN4 0.500% 04/15/14 07/15/16 1.54 0.500% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 3134GSC29 0.600% 07/22/14 07/22/16 1.56 0.600% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828WX43 0.500% 07/31/14 07/31/16 1.58 0.523% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,998,628.97 $ 9,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 3130A2TR7 0.600% 08/26/14 08/26/16 1.65 0.600% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 ,,n 1oft 7 Schedule 2 Indian River County,Florida Board of County Commissioners Investment By Maturity Date December 31,2014 Coupon/ Purchase Maturity Years To Yield To Original 12/31/14 Investment Type CUSIP Yield Date Date Maturity Maturity Par Amount Book Value Mo Cash Flow Treasury Note 912828D64 0.500% 12/05/14 08/31/16 1.67 0.50% $ 3,000,00.0 Treasury Note 912828D64 0.500% 09/02/14 08/31/16 1.67 0.510% $ 3,000,00.0 FHLB Callable 3130A24.12 0.520% 06/12/14 09/12/16 1.70 0.520% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 $ 2,999,405.23 $ 8,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 3134G5HA6 0.70% 09/19/14 09/19/16 1.72 0.70% $ 2,000,0 0.00 $ 2,00,000.0 Treasury Note 9128281`47 0.500% 12/05/14 09/30/16 1.75 0.528% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,998,980.0 Treasury Note 912828F47 0.500% 09/30/14 09/30/16 1.75 0.565% $ 3,00,000.00 $ 2,996,127.39 $ 9,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 3130A35Z3 0.800% 10/14/14 10/14/16 1.79 0.800% $ 2,00,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828F88 0.375% 12/08/14 10/31/16 1.84 0.574% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,992,50.00 $ 4,000,00.00 FFCB Callable 3133EEAE0 0.680% 10/30/14 01/30/17 2.08 0.680% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,00,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 912828B74 0.625% 12/04/14 02/15/17 2.13 0.650% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,997,656.25 FHLB -1X Call 3130A3GX6 0.750% 11/24/14 02/24/17 2.15 0.750% $ 2,00,000.00 $ 2,000,00.00 FHLMC-1X Call 3134GSNY7 0.750% 11/28/14 02/28/17 2.16 0.750% $ 3,000,00.00 $ 3,000,000.00 $ 8,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 3134G5Q81 0.850% 12/10/14 03/10/17 2.19 0.850% $ 2,000,000.00 $ 2,000,00.0 FHLMC Callable 3134G5SF3 0.850% 12/24/14 03/24/17 2.23 0.850% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,00,000.00 $ 5,00,000.00 FHLB -1X Call 3130A3PZ1 1.000% 12/30/14 06/30/17 2.50 1.000% $ 3,000,000.00 $ 3,000,0 .00Sub Total-Generallnvestments 3,000,000.00 $ 219,00,000.00 $ 218,867,022.18 $ 219,000,000.00 Regions Bank Money Market $26,101,101.59 TD Bank Money Market $30,038,881.60 Bank United Money Market $30,085,434.49 Harbor Community Bank CD ,023,416.91 Total Unrestricted General Cash&Equivalents $ 3$3$3,115,856.77 Restricted Cash-Landfill FACC--Florida Local Govt Investment Trust-Landfill Closure&Postclosure Reserves-adjusted for fair mkt value $11,460,726.07 Total Pooled Cash&Equivalents $319,576,582.84 Restricted Cash-Health Insurance Wells Fargo-BCBS Claims Account Citibank-BCBS Imprest Acct $752,692.46,000.00 Total Restricted Cash-Health Insurance $$84$84,692.46 Restricted Cash-Bond Covenants(held by BNY/Mellon) Fidelity Institutional Treasury Money Market-Utilities Debt Service Reserve $18,034.26 Treasury Note 912828VH0 0.375% 07/01/13 06/30/15 0.50 0.375% $1,592,000.00 $1,592,114.70 Treasury Note 912828A67 0.250% 12/31/13 12/31/15 1.00 0.357% $1,365,000.00 $1,364,786.72 Treasury Note 912828WO9 0.500% 06/30/14 06/30/16 1.50 0.500% $1,470,000.00 $1,470,459.64 Treasury Note 912828G46 0.500% 12/01/14 11/30/16 1.92 0.530% $1,030,000.00 $1,027,425.00 Total Restricted Cash-adjusted for fair market value $5,472,820.32 Total Portfolio $325,886,095.62 Note:See separate investment report for OPEB funds. 2of2 80 Schedule 3 Indian River County Portfolio By Maturity Date December 31, 2014 $250,000,000 $221,440,759 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $86,447,681 $50,000,000 $17,997,656 $0 0-12 Months 13-24 Months 25-36 Months Total Portfolio $325,886,096 81 Schedule 4 Indian River County Portfolio By Type December 31, 2014 FLGIT-Landfill 3.59% FFCB 8.76% FHLB 7.51% Treasury Notes 40.33% FHLMC 6.88% \ Regions$Mkt 8.17% \\\ ` T TD Bank$Mkt 9.40% FNMA 5.00% Harbor Comm $Mkt BankUnited $ Mkt 0.95% 9.41% 82 Schedule 5 Indian River County Investment Purchases and Calls/Maturities Quarter Ending December 31,2014 PURCHASES: Investment Description Yield to Maturity Purchase Date Call Date Maturity Date Par Amount Book Value FHLB Callable 0.80% 10/14/14 01/14/15 10/14/16 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FHLB Disc 0.07% 10/29/14 04/06/15 $2,000,000 $1,999,381.67 FFCB Disc 0.07% 10/29/14 04/22/15 $2,000,000 $1,999,270.83 FFCB Callable 0.68% 10/30/14 01/30/15 01/30/17 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FNMA Disc 0.07% 10/31/14 06/22/15 $2,000,000 $1,999,090.00 FNMA Disc 0.07% 10/31/14 06/30/15 $2,000,000 $1,999,058.89 FNMA Disc 0.07% 11/07/14 06/08/15 $2,000,000 $1,999,230.83 FHLMC Disc 0.08% 11/07/14 07/08/15 $2,000,000 $1,998,987.50 FNMA Disc 0.11% 11/14/14 08/06/15 $2,000,000 $1,998,380.56 FNMA Disc 0.12% 11/14/14 09/08/15 $2,000,000 $1,998,013.33 FHLMC Disc 0.17% 11/19/14 10/22/15 $2,000,000 $1,996,817.22 FHLB-1X Call 0.75% 11/24/14 11/28/15 02/24/17 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FHLMC-1X Call 0.75% 11/28/14 02/28/15 02/28/14 $3,000,000 $3,000,000.00 Treasury Note 0.66% 12/04/14 02/15/17 $3,000,000 $2,997,656.25 Treasury Note 0.26% 12/05/14 02/29/16 $3,000,000 $2,999,531.25 Treasury Note 0.51% 12/05/14 08/31/16 $3,000,000 $3,000,000.00 Treasury Note 0.53% 12/05/14 09/30/16 $2,000,000 $1,998,980.00 Treasury Note 0.57% 12/05/14 10/31/16 $2,000,000 $1,992,500.00 FHLMC Callable 0.85% 12/10/14 03/10/15 03/10/17 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 0.31% 12/10/14 04/15/16 $2,000,000 $1,997,656.25 Treasury Note 0.30% 12/15/14 02/29/16 $3,000,000 $2,998,125.00 FHLMC Callable 0.85% 12/24/14 03/24/15 03/24/17 $3,000,000 $3,000,000.00 FHLB-1X Call 1.00% 12/30/14 06/30/15 06/30/17 $3,000,000 $3,000,000.00 23 $53,000,000 1 $52,972,679.58 MATURITIES: Investment Early Description Yield to Maturit Purchase Date Call Date Maturity Date Par Amount Book Value FHLB Disc 0.08% 01/27/14 10/03/14 $2,000,000 $1,998,893.33 FHLB Bullet 0.23% 04/08/13 10/08/14 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FHLB Bullet 0.23% 04/15/13 10/15/14 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FNMA Disc 0.14% 12/05/13 10/22/14 $3,000,000 $2,996,255.01 FHLMC Callable 0.45% 01/28/14 10/28/14 01/28/16 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 0.55% 07/29/14 10/29/14 07/29/16 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 0.35% 03/03/14 10/30/14 03/03/16 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 0.29% 10/31/12 10/31/14 $3,000,000 $2,997,656.25 FFCB Bullet 0.27% 11/05/12 11/05/14 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FHLB Callable 0.66% 07/07/14 11/05/14 10/07/16 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 0.25% 01/14/13 11/14/14 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FHLMC Callable 0.70% 08/19/14 11/19/14 08/19/16 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 FFCB Bullet 0.27% 11/19/12 11/19/14 $2,000,000 $2,000,000.00 Treasury Note 0.25% 11/30/12 11/30/14 $3,000,000 $3,000,000.00 Treasury Note 0.23% 12/31/12 12/31/14 $3,000,000 $2,993,598.57 15 $34,000,000 $33,986,403.16 Reconciliation of Bonds Only: Beginning portfolio(09/30/14) $199,880,745.76 Total purchased 23 securities $52,972,679.58 Total matured 15 securities $33,986,403.16 Ending portfolio for quarter(12/31/14) $218,867,022.18 1oft 83 Schedule 6 Indian River County Change in Monthly Cash Flows For All Pooled Cash/Investment Accounts Comparison of Six Fiscal Years December 31,2014 Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Net Chane Month End Bal Net Chane Month End Bal Net Chane Month End Bal October $ (10,950,456) $ 272,116,477 $ (8,787,313) $ 286,139,875 $ (7,163,713) $ 299,325,098 November $ 7,883,140 $ 279,999,617 $ 18,859,033 $ 304,998,908 $ 15,743,556 $ 315,068,654 December $ 40,850,830 $ 320,850,447 $ 30,880,676 $ 335,879,584 $ 31,679,255 $ 346,747,909 January $ 4,043,995 $ 324,894,442 $ 4,920,377 $ 340,799,961 $ 540,328 $ 347,288,237 February $ (504,420) $ 324,390,022 $ 337,406 $ 341,137,367 $ (3,953,214) $ 343,335,023 March $ (638,064) $ 323,751,958 $ (3,074,474) $ 338,062,893 $ (4,018,678) $ 339,316,345 April $ (4,484,423) $ 319,267,535 $ (4,427,870) $ 333,635,023 $ (6,018,427) $ 333,297,918 May $ (6,148,366) $ 313,119,169 $ (5,688,925) $ 327,946,098 $ (5,148,326) $ 328,149,592 June $ (2,654,283) $ 310,464,886 $ (8,844,978) $ 319,101,120 $ (12,048,463) $ 316,101,129 July $ (3,283,074) $ 307,181,812 $ (5,588,302) $ 313,512,818 $ (5,284,467) $ 310,816,662 August $ (8,924,384) $ 298,257,428 $ (1,382,203) $ 312,130,615 $ (10,999,198) $ 299,817,464 September $ 3,330,240 $ 294,927,188 $ 5,641,804 $ 306,488,811 $ 1,512,399 $ 298,305,065 Net cash flow $ 11,860,255 $ 11,561,623 $ (8,183,746) Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Net Chane Month End Bal Net Chane Month End Bal Net Chane Month End Bal October $ (4,325,867) $ 293,979,198 $ (7,076,226) $ 291,236,824 $ (10,422,694) $ 287,937,696 November $ 16,251,425 $ 310,230,623 $ 13,411,135 $ 304,647,959 $ 19,342,864 $ 307,280,560 December $ 29,931,173 $ 340,161,796 $ 33,565,914 $ 338,213,873 $ 35,786,179 $ 343,066,739 January $ 130,635 $ 340,292,431 $ (1,632,096) $ 336,581,777 February $ (2,486,081) $ 337,806,350 $ (1,988,485) $ 334,593,292 March $ (2,787,582) $ 335,018,768 $ (474,129) $ 334,119,163 April $ (8,244,064) $ 326,774,704 $ (6,034,807) $ 328,084,356 May $ (4,598,588) $ 322,176,116 $ (5,237,557) $ 322,846,799 June $ (4,334,609) $ 317,841,507 $ (11,441,367) $ 311,405,432 July $ (4,470,572) $ 313,370,935 $ (3,166,797) $ 308,238,635 August $ (10,017,849) $ 303,353,086 $ (8,103,393) $ 300,135,242 September 1 $ 5,040,036 $ 298,313,050 $ 1,774,852 $ 298,360,390 Net cash flow $ 7,985 $ 47,340 $ 44,706,349 *Schedule represents total assets in 801 fund-including portfolio accounts, FMV adjustments,cash in bank and utilities debt reserve. Source: Balance Sheet for fund 801 (run by month) Schedule does not include OPEB investments-see separate report. 84 Schedule 7 Indian River County Pooled Interest Earnings Analysis Comparison of Two Prior Fiscal Years With Current Fiscal Year December 31,2014 Portfolio Banks-2-Qualified Public Depositories Money Market Funds (7) Treasuries&Agencies Wells Fargo-Bank SunTrust Bank TD Bank Harbor Communit BankUnited Region -Bank Regions-Lockbox FLGIT-Landfill 3 Day-to-Day 4 Utilities Reserve Benchmark (1) 12 (6) One Year Interest Interest Interest Interest Interest Interest Interest Interest Interest Month Interest Interest Average Constant Mo/Yr Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Earned Return Total Return Return Maturity Oct-12 $ 78,538 0.43% $ 2,490 0.25% $ 1,119 0.10% $ 4,129 0.35% $ 2,938 0.60% $ 4,325 1.90% $ 1,934 0.18% $ 1,106 0.24% $ 96,579 0.39% 0.18% Nov-12 $ 80,929 0.41% $ 3,050 0.25% $ 988 0.10% $ 3,617 0.35% $ 3,048 0.60% $ 8,195 2.06% $ 1,880 0.19% $ 1,262 0.28% $ 102,969 0.40% 0.18% Dec-12 $ 81,102 0.37% $ 2,408 0.25% $ 1,164 0.10% $ 4,178 0.35% $ 2,765 0.60% $ 339 1.96% $ 1,693 0.18% $ 1,262 0.28% $ 94,911 0.33% 0.16% Jan-13 $ 69,467 11.33% $ 2,560 0.25% $ 1,243 0.10% $ 4,440 0.35% $ 3,090 0.60% $ 2,432 1.48% $ 1,396 0.16% $ 1,262 0.28% $ 85,890 0.30% 0.15% Feb-13 $ 67,326 0.31% $ 2,376 0.25% $ 1,134 0.10% $ 4,024 0.35% $ 2,699 0.60% $ 16,678 1.54% $ 1,793 0.14% $ 1,262 0.28% $ 97,292 0.35% 0.16% Mar-13 $ 66,593 0.31% $ 2,647 0.25% $ 1,151 0.10% $ 4,170 0.35% $ 2,481 0.60% $ 3,585 1.51% $ 1,356 0.13% $ 1,262 0.28% $ 83,245 0.30% 0.15% Apr-13 $ 64,262 0.30% $ 2,474 0.25% $ 722 0.08% $ 3,120 0.24% $ 2,891 0.60% $ 18,536 1.45% $ 1,490 0.12% $ 1,262 0.28% $ 94,757 0.35% 0.12% May-13 $ 62,908 0.30% $ 2,573 0.25% $ 696 0.08% $ 2,701 0.23% $ 2,968 0.60% $ (24,756) 1.13% $ 1,000 0.12% $ 1,262 0.28% $ 49,352 0.18% 0.12% Jun-13 $ 62,191 0.30% $ 2,445 0.25% $ 672 0.07% $ 2,271 0.23% $ 3,083 0.60% $ (35,180) 0.61% $ 881 0.10% $ 1,262 0.28% $ 37,625 0.14% 014% Jul-13 $ 56,919 0.28% $ 2,741 0.25% $ 696 0.07% $ 2,702 0.23% $ 3,011 0.60% $ 22,336 0.43% $ 699 0.09% $ 1,263 0.28% $ 90,367 0.35% 0.12% Aug-13 $ 56,203 0.28% $ 2,637 0.25% $ 696 0.07% $ 2,456 0.23% $ 3,204 0.60% $ (8,589) 0.18% $ 646 0.08% $ 1,263 0.28% $ 58,516 0.23% 0.13% Sep-13 $ 54,148 0,29% $ 2,524 0.25% $ 673 0.07% $ 2,539 0,23% $ 2,895 0.60% $ 29,674 0.36% $ 714 0.08% $ 1,263 0.28% $ 94,430 0,38% 0.12% Oct-13 $ 49,284 0.27% $ 2,728 0.25% $ 696 0.07% $ 2,539 0.23% $ 3,028 0.60% $ 20,923 0.51% $ 724 0.07% $ 1,263 0.28% $ 81,185 0.33% 0.12% Nov-13 $ 49,775 0.27% $ 2,429 0.25% $ 673 0.07% $ 2,564 0.23% $ 3,047 0.60% $ 13,215 0.55% $ 715 0.08% $ 1,263 0.28% $ 73,681 0.29% 0.12% Dec-13 $ 53,421 0.27% $ 2,569 0.25% $ 1,233 0.07% $ 4,624 0.23% $ 3,050 0.60% $ (14,274) 0.42% $ 914 0.07% $ 1,016 0.22% $ 52,553 019% 0.13% Jan-14 $ 53,904 0.27% $ 2,563 0.25% $ 930 0.07% $ 986 0.20% $ 4,495 0.23% $ 3,303 0.60% $ 20,304 0.58% $ 1,090 0.07% $ 1,422 0.31% $ 88,997 0.32% 0.12% Feb-14 $ 53,499 0.28% $ 2,675 0.25% N/A N/A $ 3,069 0.20% $1,956 0.85% 5,439 0.40% $ 4,059 0.23% $ 2,775 0.60% $ 11,953 0.53% $ 229 0.07% $ 1,422 0.31% $ 87,076 0.31% 0.12% Mar-14 $ 54,894 0.28% $ 2,544 0.25% WA N/A $ 3,398 0.20% $2,167 0.85% 6,779 0.40% $ 4,496 0.23% $ 2,858 0.60% $ (9,802) 0.40% $ 52 0.07% $ 1,422 0.31% $ 68,808 0.25% 0.13% Apr-14 $ 55,173 0.29% $ 2,426 0.25% NIA N/A $ 3,289 0.20% $2,099 0.85% 6,563 0.40% $ 3,243 0.23% $ 2,636 0.60% $ 15,218 0.37% N/A N/A $ 1,422 0.31% $ 92,069 0.34% 0.11% May-14 $ 53,973 0.29% $ 2,849 0.25% NIA N/A $ 3,399 0.20% $2,170 0.85% 6,784 0.40% $ 4,010 0.23% $ 2,956 0.60% $ 18,640 0.77% N/A N/A $ 1,422 0.31% $ 96,203 0.36% 0.10% Jun-14 $ 54,632 0.31% $ 2,619 0.25% N/A N/A $ 3,290 0.20% $2,102 0.85% 7,026 0.40% $ 3,677 0.23% $ 3,021 0.60% $ (2,129) 1.09% N/A N/A $ 1,731 0.38% $ 75,969 0.29% 0.10% Jul-14 $ 55,559 0.32% $ 2,671 0.25% N/A N/A $ 3,400 0.20% $2,173 0.85% 8,822 0.40% $ 2,638 0.23% $ 2,769 0.60% $ (11,301) 0.77% N/A N/A $ 1,731 0.38% $ 68,462 0.27% 0.11% Aug-14 $ 56,101 0.32% $ 2,384 0.25% N/A N/A $ 3,401 0.20% $2,175 0.85% 8,825 0.40% $ 2,361 0.23% $ 3,304 0.60% $ 15,470 1.00% N/A N/A $ 1,731 0.38% $ 95,752 0.38% 0.11% Sep-14 $ 57,022 0.34% $ 2,473 0.25% N/A N/A $ 3,292 0.20% $2,106 0.85% 8,543 0.40% $ 2,629 0.23% $ 2,875 0.60% $ (8,360) 0.64% N/A N/A $ 1,731 0.38% $ 72,311 0.29% 0.11% Oct-14 $ 55,731 0.34% $ 2,715 0.25% N/A N/A $ 3,402 0.20% $2,178 0.85% 8,831 0.40% $ 2,264 0.23% $ 3,161 0.60% $ 22,042 0.65% N/A N/A $ 1,731 0.38% $ 102,055 0.43% 0.10% Nov-14 $ 56,179 0.34% $ 2,373 0.25% N/A N/A $ 3,430 0.20% $2,109 0.85% 8,549 0.40%1$ 2,305 0.23% $ 3,530 0.60% $ 13,942 0.65% N/A N/A $ 1,731 0.38% $ 94,148 0.37% 0.13% Dec-14 $ 67,692 0.34% $ 3,301 0.25% N/A NIA $ 4,526 0.20% $2,181 0.85% 9,274 0.40%1$ 4,834 0.23% $ 2,957 0.60% $ (23,742) 0.57% N/A N/A $ 1,970 0.43% $ 72,993 0.26% O.21% Notes. 1)'Investments"are accrued interest on coupon instruments. 2)"Bank"is cash received on the overnight investment of the County's cash in the bank. 3)"FLGIT is the change in market value of the Florida Local Government Investment Trust account.A monthly return is not available,consequently,the 12 month return is provided. 4) 'Day-to-Day"is a money market fund managed by the FACC under the FLGIT umbrella. 5) Average return is computed by dividing total interest income for the month by the monthly rash balances listed on schedule 6. Does not include mark to market except for FLGIT landfill. 6) Source of one-year treasury rates is the Federal Reserve website. This report does not include OPEB funds. 00 CII Schedule 8 Indian River County Allocation of Pooled Cash and Investments By Fund Types Balance in Funds as of December 31, 2014 Pooled Investments General Fund $ 70,504,929 Special Revenue Funds $ 72,454,290 Debt Service Funds $ 5,801,784 Capital Project Funds $ 55,240,925 Solid Waste Funds $ 30,698,253 Golf Course Fund $ 127,728 Building Fund $ 5,464,176 Utilities Funds $ 70,791,220 Fleet Fund $ 55,035 Insurance Funds $ 27,260,710 GIS Fund $ 1,751,931 Escrow Funds $ 2,915,758 Total Investments $ 343,066,739 Schedule includes all pooled investments, FMV adjustments, and cash in bank. Schedule does not include OPEB investments - see separate report. 86 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court&Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27h Street °� 4 Vero Beach,FL 32960 '•w,.. Telephone: (772)226-1945 TO: Board of County Commissioners (acting as Board of Trustees of OPEB Trust) FROM: Diane Bernardo, Finance Director �&� THRU: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroll DATE: January 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Quarterly OPEB Trust Report for Quarter Ending 12/31/2014 Attached please find a summary report consisting of the composition and investment return of the OPEB Trust for the first quarter of this fiscal year. These funds are held in trust by our custodian BNY/Mellon. This report was reviewed by our investment advisory committee on January 22, 2015. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the attached Quarterly OPEB Trust Report. Indian River County Appr9ved Date Administrator 3 County Attorney Bud et Department Risk Management 87 Indian River County Other Post Employment Benefits Trust Quarter Ended December 31, 2014 12/31/2014 Current Target Description Value Allocation SHORT TERM PORTION 100%cash equivalents Fidelity Treasury Money Market $ 492,484 100.0% Short-Term Portion Total $ 492,484 100.0% 50%Equities Vanguard 500 Index $ 3,341,137 23.1% USE All-World $ 2,725,248 18 9% Vanguard Mid Cap Index $ 765,403 5.3% Vanguard Small Cap Index $ 369,470 2.6% 50%Equities Subtotal $ 7,201,258 49.9/ 40%Fixed Debt Securities Vanguard Short Term Treasury $ 4,341,986 30.1% Vanguard Intermediate Treasury $ 1,451,686 10.0% 40%Fixed Debt Securities Subtotal $ 5,793,672 40.1% 10%Cash Equivalents Vanguard Prime Money Market $ 1,235,649 8.6% Vanguard Federal Money Market $ 205,631 1.4% 10%Cash Equivalents Subtotal $ 1,441,280 10.0% Long-Term Portion Total $14,436,210 100.0% Portfolio Total $14,928,694 (A) 100.0% (A)December 31,2014 values agreed to the Bank of New York statement. Performance Benchmark Grouping Return Benchmark Timeframe Short-Term Portion 0.01% 0.00% 3 months Long-Term Portion: Total-50%Equities(Blended) 1.58% 1.78% 3 months Total-40%Fixed Debt Securities(Blended) 0.63% 0.91% 3 months Total- 10%Cash Equivalents(Blended) 0.00% 0.00% 3 months Total Long-Term(Blended) 1.04% 1.25% 3 months Total Portfolio (Blended) 1.02% 1.24% 3 months 00 00 1+3k*; , I� BNY MELLON The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,N.A. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Account Statement ATTN:FINANCE DIRECTOR 1801 27TH ST BLDG A Statement Period 12/01/2014 Through 12/31/2014 VERO BEACH FL 32960-3388 Account 2� INDIAN RIVER CO OPEB TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT COURTNEY LABERGE Go Paperless.Securely access your account online to view your statements. 10161 CENTURION PARKWAY Ask your BNY Mellon contact how we can help you access your accounts,enter JACKSONVILLE,FL 32256 your own transactions or submit an audit confirmation online.Also be sure to 904-645-1964 ask how Connect(SM),our new web-based,single sign-on platform can help you LABERGE@BNYMELLON.COM go paperless. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT:CLAYTON WOODARD Visit us at www.bnymellon.com 10161 CENTURION PARKWAY JACKSONVILLE,FL 32256 904-998-4743 CLAYTON.WOODARD@BNYMELLON.COM Account Overview Percent of all Investments Asset Classification Market Value 59% O EQUITY 8,642,538.35 38% (5 FIXED INCOME 5,793,671.13 3% Ea CASH AND SHORT TERM 492,483.88 100% TOTAL OF ALL INVESTMENTS 14,928,693.36 Summary of Assets Held Asset Classification Market Value Cost Accrued Income Est Annual Income Market Yield EQUITY 8,642,538.35 6,196,735.71 0.00 163,242.29 1.88% FIXED INCOME 5,793,671.13 4,498,628.51 0.00 44,538.10 0.76% CASH AND SHORT TERM 492,483.88 492,483.88 0.00 49.25 0.01% ACCOUNT TOTALS 14,928,693.36 11,187,848.10 0.00 207,829.64 1.39% Summary of Cash Transactions Current Period Year-to-Date Realized Transaction Category Income Principal Gains/Losses Income Principal OPENING BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DIVIDENDS 54,938.76 0.00 0.00 190,549.76 0.00 SALES AND REDEMPTIONS 0.00 86,975.00 0.00 0.00 3,393,074.77 OTHER CASH ADDITIONS 0.00 308,313.86 0.00 0.00 3,630,123.08 PAYMENTS AND WITHDRAWALS 54,938.76- 930.00 - 0.00 190,549.76- 1,725,714.60- OTHER CASH DISBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 990.00- PURCHASES 0.00 394,358.86 0.00 0.00 5,296,493.85- CLOSING BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The above cash transactions summary is provided for information purposes only and may not reflect actual taxable income or deductible expenses as reportable under the Internal Revenue Code. N V U N 3 v 0 w N A 89 Page 15 of 36 Page 1 of 8 JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA ' •c°uMr�c • Clerk of Circuit Court&Comptroller Finance Department 1801 271'Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 "� •' Telephone: (772)226-1945 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Diane Bernardo, Finance Director THROUGH: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroll DATE: January 20, 2015 SUBJECT: Dori Slosberg Driver Education Safety Act Indian River County Traffic Education Program Trust Fund Report Cumulative Reporting Through 12/31/14 BACKGROUND On August 20, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance Number 2002-026 creating the Indian River County Traffic Education Program Trust Fund (our fund 137). This ordinance authorized a $3 traffic ticket surcharge, which is collected by the Clerk of the Circuit Court. On September 19, 2006, the Board adopted Ordinance 2006-035 to repeal this fine. Attached to this memo is a report of the revenues and expenditures from the inception of the $3 fee (October 1, 2002) through December 31, 2014. The Board currently carries a balance of$7,786 which is available to area schools. The Clerk's office will continue to provide a quarterly report of the traffic education trust activity until all of the funds have been spent. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the attached report. Indian River Approve Date Administrator .4 5 County torney 1 Bud et 1 De artment Risk 90 Indian River County,Florida Statement of Revenues,Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Traffic Education Program FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FYI FYI FY13 FY14 FY15 Inception 10/01/2002- 10/01/2003- 1010112004- 10101/2005- 1010112006- 10/01/2007- 10/0112008- 10/01/2009- 10/0112010- 10/0112011- 10/01/2012- 10/01/2013- 10/01/2014- to Date 9/3012003 9/3012004 9130/2005 9/30/2006 9/30/2007 9/30/2008 9/30/2009 9/30/2010 9/30/2011 9/30/2012 9/30/2013 9/30/2014 12/31/2014 Totals REVENUES Fines and forfeitures $ 42,563 $ 42,225 $ 41,794 $ 48,372 $ 9,537 $ 1,575 $ 744 $ 525 $ 384 $ 213 $ 36 $ 15 $ 9 Interest 222 686 2,130 5,797 8,426 4,999 2,989 753 240 104 70 28 - Total Revenues 42,785 42,911 43,924 54,169 17,963 6,574 3,733 1,278 624 317 106 43 9 214,436 EXPENDITURES Public Safety - - - 25,188 44,373 36,210 29,962 35,317 7,565 8,900 12,460 6,675 - Total Expenditures - - - 25,188 44,373 36,210 29,962 35,317 7,565 8,900 12,460 6,675 - 206,650 Net change in fund balances 42,785 42,911 43,924 28,981 (26,410) (29,636) (26,229) (34,039) (6,941) (8,583) (12,354) (6,632) 9 Fund balances at beginning of year - 42,785 85,696 129,620 158,601 132,191 102,555 76,326 42,287 35,346 26,763 14,409 7,777 Fund balances at end of year 42,785 85,696 129,620 158,601 132,191 102,555 76,326 42,287 35,346 26,763 14,409 1 7,777 7,786 7,786 School District of Indian River County $114,535 St.Edwards School $ 92,115 Total Disbursed to Date $206,650 • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engine$w SUBJECT: Work Order No. 1,Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. Intergenerational Recreation Facility at South County Regional Park IRC Project No. 1135 DATE: January 14, 2015 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On September 16, 2014,the Board of County Commissioners approved the annual agreement for Professional Geotechnical Services, with Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. for various services including,but not limited to,field and laboratory construction materials testing in Indian River County. The purpose of Work Order No. 1 is to provide testing related services to the construction of the Intergenerational Recreation Facility at South County Regional Park. Andersen Andre Consulting Engineer, Inc. submitted a proposal outlined in the attached Work Order No. 1 and Scope of Services (Exhibit A) for a not-to-exceed amount of$57,115.00. FUNDING Funding is budgeted in Account No. 31521072-066510-03028 Optional Sales Tax, Intergenerational Recreation Facility at South County Regional Park in the amount of $57,115.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 1 to Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. authorizing the above-mentioned professional services as outlined in the attached Scope of Services(Exhibit A)and requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Work Order No. 1 on their behalf for a not-to-exceed amount of$57,115.00. 92 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1 135-S County Park Intergeneratiional Rec Facility\Adrnun\agenda iterns\BCC Agenda Andersen Andre WO No I.doc Page 2 Work Order No. 1, Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. Intergenerational Recreation Facility at South County Regional Par For February 3, 2015 BCC Meeting ATTACHMENTS 1. Work Order No. 1 2. Scope of Work (Exhibit A) DISTRIBUTION 1. Deward Howard, Construction Coordination Manager 2. Don Keith, Sr. Engineering Inspector 3. Dan Trbovich, Borrelli & Partners, Inc. 4. Anderson Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR February 10, 2015 Indian River County Approved Date BY Administration 5 �� e Budget I I Legal `t ) Public Works Engineering 93 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1 135-S County Park Intergeneratiional Rec Facility\Admim\agenda items\BCC Agenda Andersen Andre WO No.I.doc Board of County Commissioners 180127th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (772) 567-8000 FAX: (772)-778-9391 Construction Materials Testing For Intergenerational Recreation Facility at South County Regional Park IRC Project No. 1135 WORK ORDER NO. 1 (Engineering Division) FOR FOR PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT, RFQ NO. 2014007 WITH ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEER, INC. All services performed under this contract shall be supervised and certified by a licensed Professional Engineer(PE) registered with the State of Florida and staff employed directly with your firm. Scope of Services All work shall be performed on a unit price or hourly rate basis in accordance with the attached Scope of Services (Exhibit A) dated December 22, 2014 and shall comply with Standards enumerated in the ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT, RFQ 2014007 WITH ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Effective Date: October 1, 2014 Minimum Specification Requirements as follows: Site Work Testing • Mass Site Fill Density Testing • Parking Lots,Entrance Roadway,Access Drive and Curb Pad • Stormdrain System • Sanitary Sewer • Water Line and Fire Main • Miscellaneous Tie-ins,Valves, Hydrants Conflicts • Laboratory Testing • Concrete Testing Vertical Construction Testing • In-Place Soil Density Testing • Concrete Testing All work shall also comply with the current Florida Minimum Technical Standards. 94 Work Order No. 1 Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. IRC Project No. 1135 COMPENSATION. The COUNTY agrees to pay, and the Geotechnical Professional agrees to accept, a fee for services rendered according to the "Scope of Services" identified in the attached EXHIBIT "A" Fee Schedule and Man Hours. A Not-to-Exceed Amount of: $57,115.00 to be paid on a unit price or hourly rate basis for actual work performed in accordance with the schedule of services and fees set forth in Exhibit A of the ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT RFQ 2014007 WITH ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. Effective Date: October 1,2014. TIME FOR COMPLETION This Work Order No.1 shall run concurrently with the construction work for the Intergenerational Recreation Facility at South County Regional Park, IRC Project No. 1135. IN WITNESS HEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents This day of ,2015. OWNER ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING BOARD OF COUNTY ENGINEERS, INC. COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA Wesley S.Davis,Chairman David P.Andre,P.E.,Principal Engineer Approved by BCC Witnessed by: ATTEST: Jeffrey R.Smith,Clerk of Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk (Printed name) Peter G.Andersen, P.E. Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficienc I Dylan Reingold,66nty Attorney s aird,County Administrator 95 ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. December 22,2014 Geotechnical Engineering AACE Pro osal No. P14-392 Construction Materials Testing p Environmental Consulting EXHIBIT A Indian River County Engineering Department 1801 27th Street Vero Beach,Florida 32960 Attention: Mr. Christopher J. Kafer Jr.,P.E. County Engineer PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTERGENERATIONAL RECREATION CENTER INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA Per your request, Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers, Inc. (AACE) is pleased to present this proposal for performing construction materials testing for Indian River County's proposed Intergenerational Recreation Center located in Vero Beach,Florida. Based on our review of the Civil Plans prepared for the subject site by Masteller&Moler,Inc. (M&M) dated November 12, 2014 and provided to us by the County, we understand that the proposed recreational facility will be constructed on approximately 12 acres of the 75.11-acre County-owned parent tract located at the northeast corner of Oslo Road and 20`h Avenue. This phase of the project (Phase I)includes the construction of a 37,753 square-foot recreation building,approximately 140,000 square feet of paved parking,a two-cell stormwater management pond (separated by a littoral planting area) and two dry retention ponds,as well as an outdoor event lawn,various patio areas,sidewalks and entranceway features. Additional project elements include drainage improvements and utility installations. Based on our review of M&M's Paving and Grading plans,it appears that approximately 3-4 feet of fill will be needed to raise the site to proposed grades. We understand that the services for which we are preparing this proposal include density testing of all soil and base rock as well as concrete testing associated with site work activities, and also for vertical construction. For the purposes of this proposal,we have separated our services (and costs) as follows: Site Work Vertical Construction ► Density testing for building pads, parking ► Density testing for building footings, lot, roadways, utility and stormdrain conduit backfill,etc.; excavation backfill, sidewalk, and patio ► Compressive strength of concrete testing subgrade; for building construction and pads; ► Compressive strength of concrete testing for sidewalks and curbing; 573 SW Biltmore Street,Port St. Lucie,Florida 34983 Ph: 772-807-9191 Fx: 772-807-9192 www.aaceinc.com 96 Intergenerational Recreation Center Page_2_ AACE Proposal No.P14-392 Based upon our cursory review of the project plans and our prior experience in the area and with sites and projects similar to this one,we estimate the cost of testing services will be$57,115.00(itemized on pages 3 through 5). The actual cost of AACE's testing services will be a function of work actually performed in accordance with the attached unit fee schedule (per the Continuing Service Contract between Indian River County and AACE). Contractor efficiency,methodology and changes in testing frequencies may affect the testing cost. We will notify you in advance if it appears that the cost estimate will be exceeded. To authorize us to proceed with this project, please execute and return to us a copy of the attached Professional Services Agreement form or a Purchase Order number. If you have any questions or if we can provide any additional information,please feel free to contact us at your convenience. Best Regards, ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. David P.Andre,P.E. Peter G.Andersen,P.E. Principal Engineer Principal Engineer ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. WWW.AACEINC.COM 97 Intergenerational Recreation Center Page-3- AACE Proposal No.P14-392 Proposed Testing Frequency Unless otherwise requested,the following in-place density testing frequencies will be used for the subject project(based on the accepted industry standard for projects such as TMC). Mass Site Fill Natural Ground-1 test performed 1 foot into natural ground(after stripping and grubbing)per 5,000 square feet; Embankment/Filled Area-1 test per 5,000 square feet,per lift of fill; Roadways: Stabilized Subgrade-1 test per 200 lineal feet,per travel direction; Base Course-1 test(1 lift except for entrance road-2 lifts)per 200 lineal feet,per travel direction; Curb pads-1 test per 200 lineal feet, Sidewalks-1 test per 200 lineal feet,per 12-inch lift of embankment; Padang Lot: Natural Ground-1 test performed 1 foot into natural ground(after stripping and grubbing)per 5,000 square feet; Embankment/Filled Area- 1 test per 5,000 square feet,per lift of fill; Stabilized Subgrade-1 test per 5,000 square feet, Base Course-1 test(assuming base constructed in one lift)per 5,000 square feet; Buildings: Pad Fill-1 test per 2,000 square feet,per lift of fill; Continuous Footings-1 test performed 1 foot into bottom of footing excavation per every 50 feet of footing; Column/Isolated Footings-Minimum of 1 test performed 1 foot into bottom of footing excavation per footing, Drainage: Structures-One(1)test per lift of backfill,from bottom of structure to top of structure.(Fill placed on all sides of structure is probed with a manual probe rod to confirm uniform compactive effort); Piping-1 test per 200 lineal feet(or per backfill/open cut operation)per lift along side of pipe to top-of-pipe,then every 1 foot of fill atop pipe thereafter; Utilities: Sanitary Sewer Pipe-1 test per 200 lineal feet(or per backfill/open cut operation)per lift along side of pipe to top- of-pipe,then every 1 foot of fill atop pipe thereafter; Water Main- 1 test per 200 lineal feet of pipe (or per backfill/open cut operation)per lift from top-of-pipe to finished grade + 1 test per 200 lineal feet for pipe bedding. We have assumed a maximum of 3 feet of cover for water main backfill; Misc. Electrical/Plumbing/Irrigation/I.T. Conduit- 1 test per 200 lineal feet of pipe (or per backfill/open cut operation)per lift from top-of-pipe to finished grade. Concrete/Grout Testing: A minimum of one set of four(4) cylinders will be made for every pour,and for each 50 cubic yards for larger pours; One slump test will be performed for every pour,and for each 50 cubic yards for larger pours; 98 Intergenerational Recreation Center Page-4- AACE Proposal No.P14-392 Site Work Testing Mass Site Fill Density Testing; ► 360,000 ft'of filled area x 4 ft.of fill(+ 1'Natural Ground)x 1 test/5,000 ft' =360 In-Place Density Tests @$23.00/test .. ...... ....... ...... . . . .. .. .. .. .... .. ..... .... $8,280.00 Parking Lots.Entrance Roadway,access Drive and Curb Pad(top 1'of embankment+subgrade+base): P. 140,000 fe x 1 test/5,000 ft'x 3 test/location;Assume 100 In-Place Density Tests @$23.00/test ... $2,300.00 Stormdrain System(_Piping+ Structures): ► Stormdrain Structure Backfill Testing=150 In-Place Density Tests @$23.00/test .. .. ... .... .... $3,450.00 ► Stormdrain Piping Backfill Testing=130 In-Place Density Tests @$23.00/test.. .... .... ........ $2,990.00 SanitaU SewerP(_pi ing+Manholes): ► 90 In-Place Density Tests @$23.00/test ..... .. .. .. . .......... .. .. .... .. .. . . . .. ....... .... $2,070.00 Water Line and Fire Main: M. 40 In-Place Density Tests @$23.00/test ... . . . . .... . . .... .... . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. ... .... .... . $920.00 Miscellaneous Tie-ins,Valves,Hydrants.Conflicts,etc. ► 25 In-Place Density Tests @$23.00/test ... . . . . .... . . . ... .. ... .. .. .... ... . . .... ... .... .. .. . $575.00 Laboratory Testing: ► LBRs(parking lot and roadway subgrade and base rock);6 tests @$295.00/test .. .... ... ........ $1,770.00 ► Proctor Tests;8 tests @$85.00/test . ...... . .. ... .. . . ... ... . ... .. .. .. .. .. . . ...... .. .. .... . $680.00 Concrete Testing: ► Sidewalks and Curbing: 10 sets of 4-cylinder concrete specimen(tested at 7,28,28 days and Hold) @$85.00/set[$55.00/hour/technician charged for time spent beyond 1 hour per scheduled set of cylinders made]. ..... .. .. . ... .. .. ...... .... .. .. .... .. . . . .. ... .... .... . $850.00 Misc.Man-hours: We have included limited man-hours that may be necessary during standby during deflections, LBR/Proctor Sampling, subgrade inspections,field meetings,roadway restorations(i.e.,15''Street SW),etc. ► Senior Project Engineer;3 hrs./week x 52 weeks x$110.00/hr. .. .... .. ............ .. . ..... .. $17,160.00 ► Senior Field Technician;3 hrs./week x 52 weeks x$55.00/hr. ......... . .... . ... .. .. .. ..... .... $8,580.00 ► Technical Secretary;25 hours x$45.00/hr. .. .. .. .... . . ....... .... . . .. ...... .. .. .. ......... $1,125.00 Site Work Testing Subtotal: . $50,750.00 99 Intergenerational Recreation Center Page-5- AACE Proposal No.P14-392 Vertical Construction Testing In-Place Soil Density Testing: ► Recreation Center Wall Footings;50 density tests @$23.00/test . . ...... .... .... .. .... .. .. .. .. .... $1,150.00 ► Isolated Footings;20 density tests @$23.00/test .... .. .. . ..... . . .... .... .... . ...... .... .. .. .... . $460.00 ► Misc.Conduit Trench Backfill;25 density tests @$23.00/test .. . . . . ............ . . .. ...... .. . . .. .. . $575.00 Concrete Testing: It is difficult to accurately predict the number of concrete specimens needed for QA/QC for a project such as the Intergenerational Recreation Center since the number of tests is largely based on the number of pours(i.e.,1 set of cylinders for a 50 cubic yard pour vs.5 sets of cylinders for five separate 10 cubic yard pours,etc.). Without knowing the Contractor's methodology or pour schedule for this work element,we largely base the concrete testing budget on our experience with similar projects. For this purpose,we have assumed the following: (1) Tilt-Up Panels: 86 panels (avg.width/height: 30'/20'x 4" = 7.5 yd'per panel,pouring 10 panels/day,2 sets of specimen/pour) P. 20 sets of 4 cylinders for compressive strength testing @$85.00/set .. .. ...... ... . .. .. .. ... $1,700.00 (2) Recreation Center Columns: ► 5 sets of 4 cylinders for compressive strength testing @$85.00/set ... ..... ... .. . ... .. .. .... $425.00 (3) Recreation Center Slab(Assume 4 pours,2 sets/pour): ► 8 sets of 4 cylinders for compressive strength testing @$85.00/set ... .. .. . . . ... .... .. .. ... . $680.00 (4) Senior Technician for Standby during larger pours,extra slumping,etc. ► 25 hours @$55.00/hour ..... . . .. .. . .. .. .. . .. ..... . ..... ...... .... .... ...... .. .. ... $1,375.00 Vertical Construction Testing Subtotal: . . $6,365.00 TOTAL ANTICIPATED TESTING BUDGET(SITE WORK+VERTICAL) . . . . . . . $57.115.00 100 Intergenerational Recreation Center Page-6- AACE Proposal No.P14-392 The following conditions apply to this project: (1) A minimum of 4 density tests or 1 set of concrete testing will need to be performed per hour,per visit to the site. (2) Stand-by time will be charged at$55.00/hour per technician. (3) We note that density testing frequencies are approximate and based on our experience with similar projects and anticipated contractor methodologies. Allowances for re-tests(from failing density tests)are not included herein. (4) The contractor should contact Andersen Andre Consulting Engineers,Inc.at(772) 807-9191 a minimum of 24 hours prior to any testing and 48 hours prior to weekend and evening work. (5) Unit rates apply to standard working days,Monday through Friday,7:00 a.m to 6:00 p.m. Testing and hourly rates will be increased by 50%for weekend,holiday or after-hours services. (6) The following testing costs are not included within this estimate:costs associated with asphalt testing(either in the field or laboratory)or bacteriological testing of potable water(bac-t's). Such testing can be performed if requested using the rates included herein. (7) If our testing estimate for a specific work element is insufficient for that particular activity,resources from another work element can be used without prior authorization from the client as long as our total cost estimate is not exceeded. We will notify you in advance if it appears that the cost estimate presented in the attached unit fee schedule will be exceeded. (8) Soil sample pickup for laboratory testing(e.g.,Proctor testing)will be billed at$55.00/hour if not scheduled with other work. (9) We note that the number of sets of concrete cylinders is dependent on numerous factors,such as the size and duration of pours. For example,if numerous"smaller"pours(e.g.,10-yard pours)occur during construction,our estimate for the number of sets of concrete cylinders may be exceeded,thus requiring revision of this proposal to account for this testing cost increase. - - (10)No paint-thickness or fire proofing thickness testing,bolt-tightness,steel or weld inspections,or floor levelness testing are included herein;we would be pleased to revise this proposal to include such services if requested. 101 CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: January 27, 2015 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Jason E. Brown, Budget Director FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Extension to Agreement for Auction Services BACKGROUND: On February 19, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners awarded RFP 2013025 for Auction Services to Associate Auctions, LLC, of Stuart, FL. The award was for one year with options for five one-year renewals. The first extension was authorized on February 11, 2014 and expires on February 18, 2015. SOURCE OF FUNDS: No funding is allocated for these services, as auctions are held on an as needed basis, and in accordance with the Agreement, all associated expenses are paid by the auctioneer (with the exception of advertising for reserve auctions). RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Board of County Commissioners approve of the attached Second Extension to the Agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute it. ATTACHMENTS: Second Extension to Agreement APPROVED AGENDA I EM � Indian River Co Appr D e Admin By Legal Josep A. Baird, County Administrator Budget Risk OR: February 10, 2015 102 SECOND EXTENSION TO AGREEMENT FOR PROVIDING AUCTION SERVICES FOR INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA This Extension to that certain Agreement to provide auction services is entered into effective as of February 19, 2015 by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County") and Associate Auctions, LLC, a Florida corporation, having its principal address at 416 SE Cortez Ave., Stuart, Florida 34994 ("Auctioneer"). BACKGROUND RECITALS A. Effective February 19, 2013, the County and the Auctioneer entered into an Agreement for Auction Services. B. Article 22 of the Agreement contains the term and renewal provisions. C. The first renewal term commenced effective as of February 19, 2014 and shall end on February 18, 2015 D. Pursuant to the Agreement, the parties desire to again renew the Agreement by this Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the County and the Auctioneer agree as follows: 1. The background recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this First Extension. 2. The second renewal term shall commence effective as of February 19, 2015 and shall end on February 18, 2016; two additional renewal terms are available beyond this second renewal. All renewal terms are subject to 30-day termination in accordance with the terms of this Contract. 3. All terms and provisions of the Contract shall be and remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. ASSOCIATE AUCTIONS, LLC INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By I By: Authorized Signature) Wesley S. Davis, Chairman, Board of County Commissioners �{n Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: (Corpor ee Seal) Date an Reingold, County Attorney Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court And Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk 103 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Wo s Director FROM: Louise Gates, Land Acquisition S eciali t SUBJECT: CR510 Right-of-Way Acquisition CR510 and Shore Lane-southwest corner Parcel I.D. #31-39-27-00003-0000-00003.0 Project Parcel 9480,080 & #880 Seller: B. Anders Nyquist, As Trustee of the Unrecorded Nyquist Trust#2, u/a/d July 22, 1992 DATE: January 21, 2015 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS This project consists of widening CR510 (85th Street) between 55th Avenue and the Indian River Lagoon, from a two-lane to a four-lane, median-divided road with turn lanes. From the subject parcel, the County will need to acquire right-of-way consisting of 1,465 square feet, a temporary construction easement containing 6,871 square feet and 2,537 square feet of property to be used as a drainage easement along the CR510 frontage. The property is zoned RS 1. County staff negotiated an agreement with Mr. Nyquist to purchase the right-of-way, temporary construction easement and drainage easement for the price of $27,500 inclusive of fees, thereby eliminating the time and expense of retaining an attorney or going through the court process of eminent domain. FUNDING Funds for this expenditure are available from Traffic Impact Fees/District I/ROW/CR 510/55th Ave to Indian River, Account# 10215141-066120-05023 RECOMMENDATIONS The Board's options include the following: Option 1: Approve the transaction, purchasing the right-of-way (1,465 square feet of right-of-way, 6,871 square feet for a temporary construction easement and a drainage easement containing 2,537 square feet) for a purchase price of $27,500 inclusive of all fees. 1 104 Option 2: Reject the terms of the Agreement and continue to negotiate. Staff recommends Option 1: The Board of County Commissioners approves the purchase of the property and easements for a total price of$27,500 and authorizes the Chairman to sign the Purchase and Sale Agreement. ATTACHMENT 1. Two "Originals" of the Purchase Agreements DISTRIBUTION Christopher R. Mora, Public Works Director Louise Gates, Land Acquisition Specialist APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Indian River County Approyed Date For: February 10, 2015 a / Administration BY Budget z 2 ► i Legal �ti1 Engineering ivision /f Public Works 2 105 Original AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE, SELL, AND LEASE REAL ESTATE BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND B. ANDERS NYQUIST, AS TRUSTEE OF THE UNRECORDED NYQUIST TRUST #2, u/a/d JULY 22, 1992 THIS AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of January, 2015, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("the County"), and B. ANDERS NYQUIST, AS TRUSTEE OF THE UNRECORDED NYQUIST TRUST#2, u/a/d JULY 22, 1992, (Seller) who agree as follows: WHEREAS, B.Anders Nyquist, as Trustee, owns property located on the southwest corner of CR510 and Shore Lane, Vero Beach, Florida. A sketch and legal description of the property is attached to this agreement as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein; and WHEREAS,the County is scheduled to expand CR510, also known as 85th Street, in the future and the road expansion will impact the property of B. Anders Nyquist; and WHEREAS, in order for the County to proceed with its road expansion plans, the County needs to purchase property to be used as right-of-way from landowners adjacent to CR510; and WHEREAS, the County has contacted B. Anders Nyquist and has offered to purchase approximately 1,465 square feet of property to be used as right-of-way, as depicted on Exhibit "A"; 6,871 square feet of property to be used as a temporary construction easement, as depicted on Exhibit"B" and 2,537 square feet of property to be used as drainage easement, as depicted on Exhibit "C" (the Property), and WHEREAS, the County is prepared to take the Property by using its power of eminent domain; and WHEREAS, B. Anders Nyquist and the County wish to avoid the risk, time and expense of litigation by entering into this agreement for sale and purchase of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms, conditions, promises, covenants and premises hereinafter, the COUNTY and SELLER agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are affirmed as being true and correct and are incorporated herein 2. Agreement to Purchase and Sell. The Seller hereby agrees to sell to the County, and the County hereby agrees to purchase from Seller, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement that certain parcel of real property located on the southwest corner of CR510 and Shore Lane, Vero Beach, Florida and more specifically described in the sketch and legal description attached as Exhibit"A", fee simple, containing approximately 1 106 Original 1,465 square feet, Exhibit"B",temporary construction easement, containing approximately 6,871 square feet and Exhibit "C", drainage easement, containing approximately 2,537 square feet, all improvements thereon, together with all easements, rights and uses now or hereafter belonging thereto (collectively, the "Property"). 2.1 Purchase Price Effective Date. The purchase price ("Purchase Price") for the Property shall be $27,500.00 (Twenty Seven Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars). The Purchase Price shall be paid on the Closing Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the County shall have approved the execution of this Agreement, either by approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners at a formal meeting of such Board or by the County Administrator pursuant to his delegated authority. 3. Title. Seller shall convey marketable title to the Property by warranty deed free of claims, liens, easements and encumbrances of record or known to Seller; but subject to property taxes for the year of Closing and covenants, restrictions and public utility easements of record, provided: (a) there exists at Closing no violation of any of the foregoing; and (b) none of the foregoing prevents County's intended use and development of the Property ("Permitted Exceptions"). 3.1 County may order an Ownership and Encumbrance Report or Title Insurance Commitment with respect to the Property. County shall within fifteen (15) days following the Effective Date of this Agreement deliver written notice to Seller of title defects. Title shall be deemed acceptable to County if(a) County fails to deliver notice of defects within the time specified, or (b) County delivers notice and Seller cures the defects within thirty (30) days from receipt of notice from County of title defects ("Curative Period"). Seller shall use best efforts to cure the defects within the Curative Period and if the title defects are not cured within the Curative Period, County shall have thirty (30) days from the end of the Curative Period to elect, by written notice to Seller, to: (i) to terminate this Agreement, whereupon shall be of no further force and effect, or(ii) extend the Curative Period for up to an additional 90 days; or (iii) accept title subject to existing defects and proceed to closing. 4. Representations of the Seller. 4.1 Seller is indefeasibly seized of marketable, fee simple title to the Property, and is the sole owner of and has good right, title, and authority to convey and transfer the Property which is the subject matter of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 4.2 From and after the Effective Date of this Agreement, Seller shall take no action which would impair or otherwise affect title to any portion of the Property, and shall record no documents in the Public Records which would affect title to the Property, without the prior written consent of the County. 4.3.1 There are no existing or pending special assessments affecting the Property,which are or may be assessed by any governmental authority, water or sewer authority, school district, drainage district or any other special taxing district. 2 107 Original 5. Default. 5.1 In the event the County shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the Seller shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the County at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the Seller nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages, or otherwise against the County; or (ii) waive the County's default and proceed to Closing. 5.2 In the event the Seller shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the County shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i)terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the Seller at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the County nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages or otherwise against the Seller; or(ii)obtain specific performance of the terms and conditions hereof; or (iii) waive the Seller's default and proceed to Closing: 6. Closing. 6.1 The closing of the transaction contemplated herein ("Closing" and "Closing Date") shall take place within 45 days following the execution of the contract by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. The parties agree that the Closing shall be as follows: (a) The Seller shall execute and deliver to the County a warranty deed, conveying marketable title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and in the condition required by paragraph 3. A drainage easement and temporary construction easement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances (b) The Seller shall have removed all of its personal property and equipment from the Property and Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to County vacant and in the same or better condition that existed at the Effective Date hereof. (c) If Seller is obligated to discharge any encumbrances at or prior to Closing and fails to do so, County may use a portion of Purchase Price funds to satisfy the encumbrances. (d) If the Seller is a non-resident alien or foreign entity, Seller shall deliver to the County an affidavit, in a form acceptable to the County, certifying that the Seller and any interest holders are not subject to tax under the Foreign Investment and Real Property Tax Act of 1980. (e) The Seller and the County shall each deliver to the other such other documents or instruments as may reasonably be required to close this transaction. 6.2 Taxes. All taxes and special assessments which are a lien upon the property on or prior to the Closing Date (except current taxes which are not yet due and payable) shall be paid by the Seller. 7. Closing Costs; Expenses. County shall be responsible for preparation of all Closing documents. 3 108 Original 7.1 County shall pay the following expenses at Closing: 7.1.1 The cost of recording the warranty deed and any release or satisfaction obtained by Seller pursuant to this Agreement. 7.1.2 Documentary Stamps required to be affixed to the warranty deed. 7.1.3 All costs and premiums for the owner's marketability title insurance commitment and policy, if any. 7.2 Seller shall pay the following expenses at or prior to Closing: 7.2.1 All costs necessary to cure title defect(s) or encumbrances, other than the Permitted Exceptions, and to satisfy or release of record all existing mortgages, liens or encumbrances upon the Property. 7.2.2 Any taxes, prorated due as of the closing date. 8. Miscellaneous. 8.1 Controlling Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue shall be in Indian River County for all state court matters, and in the Southern District of Florida for all federal court matters. 8.2 Condemnation. In the event that all or any part of the Property shall be acquired or condemned for any public or quasi-public use or purpose, or if any acquisition or condemnation proceedings shall be threatened or begun prior to the Closing of this transaction, County shall have the option to either terminate this Agreement, and the obligations of all parties hereunder shall cease, or to proceed, subject to all other terms, covenants, conditions, representations and warranties of this Agreement, to the Closing of the transaction contemplated hereby and receive title to the Property; receiving, however, any and all damages, awards or other compensation arising from or attributable to such acquisition or condemnation proceedings. County shall have the right to participate in any such proceedings. 8.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this transaction and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, between the Seller and the County relating to the subject matter hereof. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and executed by each of the parties. 8.4 Assignment and Bindinq Effect. Neither County nor Seller may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. The terms hereof shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 8.5 Notices. Any'notice shall be deemed duly served if personally served or if mailed 4 109 Original by certified mail, return receipt requested, or if sent via "overnight" courier service or facsimile transmission, as follows: If to Seller: B. Anders Nyquist 1805 191h Place, #100 Vero Beach, FL 32960 If to County: Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL. 32960 Attn: Land Acquisition/Louise Gates Either party may change the information above by giving written notice of such change as provided in this paragraph. 8.6 Survival and Benefit. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each agreement, representation or warranty made in this Agreement by or on behalf of either party, or in any instruments delivered pursuant hereto or in connection herewith, shall survive the Closing Date and the consummation of the transaction provided for herein. The covenants, agreements and undertakings of each of the parties hereto are made solely for the benefit of, and may be relied on only by the other party hereto, its successors and assigns, and are not made for the benefit of, nor may they be relied upon, by any other person whatsoever. 8.7 Attorney's Fees and Costs. In any claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. 8.8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each one of which shall constitute an original. 8.9. County Approval Required: This Agreement is subject to approval by the Indian River County as set forth in paragraph 2. 8.10 Beneficial Interest Disclosure: In the event Seller is a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall provide a fully completed, executed, and sworn beneficial interest disclosure statement in the form attached to this Agreement as an exhibit that complies with all of the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 286.23 prior to approval of this Agreement by the County. However, pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 286.23 (3) (a), the beneficial interest in any entity registered with the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose interest is for sale to the general public, is exempt from disclosure; and where the Seller is a non-public entity, that Seller is not required to disclose persons or entities holding less than five (5%) percent of the beneficial interest in Seller. 8.11 "Seller acknowledges receipt of the "Notice to Owner" nd understands his/her rights granted under Florida Law Chapters 73 and 74." 5 110 Original Initials IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA B. ANDERS NYQUIST, AS TRUSTEE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE UNRECORDED NYQUIST TRUST#2, u/a/d JULY 22, 1992 auee� I Z� 6 * Wesley S. Davis, Chairman B. Anders Nyquist, Trustee Date Approved by BCC ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Josep . Baird, County Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 6 111 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003. 0 B. ANDERS NYOUIST, ( TR ) ORB 970 PG 349 STATE ROAD 510 RIGHT-OF -WAY PARCEL 480 SURVEYOR'S NOTES: LEXHIBIT , I . THIS 1S NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. BEARINGS SHOWN BASED ON CENTERLINE OF STATE ROAD 510 AND SOUTH LINE OF THE S.E. 1 /4 OF SECTION 28: SAID LINE BEARS S 89°55'50- E. 3. DISTANCES SHOWN BASED ON ENGLISH UNITS. US SURVEY FOOT. 4. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH IS BASED ON THE PRELIMINARY RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 (WABASSO ROAD). PREPARED BY BURDETTE AND ASSOCIATES. DATED "FINAL GMB 3-08", CONSISTING OF 10 SHEETS AS DIRECTED BY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 5. THE SCALE OF THIS DRAWING MAY HAVE BEEN DISTORTED DURING REPRODUCTION PROCESS. I EGENf� BASELINE C.R. . COUNTY ROAD D.E. • DRAINAGE EASEMENT A . DELTA FND. . FOUND L . ARC LENGTH O.R.B. . OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK P.B. . PLAT BOOK PG. . PAGE ? - PROPERTY LINE P.O.B. . POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT R . RADIUS R/W . RIGHT-OF-WAY SEC. . SECTION S.R. . STATE ROAD T.C.E. . TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT CERTIFICATIONe I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 1S TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. FURTHER. THIS DOCUMENT 1S IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA STATUTES. FOR THE FIRM. ---------------------------------------------- CHRISTOPHER P. MILLER. PSM FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER 5921 CARDNO TBE � ^Carw� PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY J 7BE STATE ROAD NO. 510 - PARCEL 480 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CARDNO TBE er DATE MEIAKD or. DATA same. 34 N.T7. SSrh STREET �� RT. 1.%D*9RDALE, RL, 33309 DRA>rN C YI LLER 03-07.13 CARDNO TBE N/A �ONE••9S,•93B•9399 LB-"60 a+EaED Y SOIERS 03.00.13 CARDNO TBE PNs 05038-002-00 SHEET I OF 3 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003. 0 B. ANDERS NYOUIST. ( TR ) ORB 970 PG 349 STATE ROAD 510 RIGHT-OF -WAY PARCEL 480 NARANJA TRACT SHELLMOUND BEACH mWNW P.B. 1 . PG. 6 gy OD oR s �o o \ o ING i NE U va y� EXIST R 1W �� W sy t J " 100' Ole r Q pCO\319 � SOL 1; SEP P PPT CES TSO E ST `E S E pR A D RPP � 1. TOISI R Q�OPO WE ANpERs CEL �'Q- 8• ST P PR SRL 1 RLY �-k�O r�, Ny OV 1 NG SOOT H WEST E Q�P� hOti EXIST R/W \-INE EXISTRNW ��p E � SNpFtE ph (301, 28 LI B. ANDERS NYOUIST. (TR) S 8�S�50" O.R.B. 970, PG. 349 33 31392700003000000003.0 SECTI N LINE 8 @ SURVEY C.R. 510 (WABASSO RD. ) , .O.C. LINE DATA S. I /4 CORNER LINEI BEARING DISTANCE SEC. 28-31 -39 FND. BOAT SPIKE LI S 89°55'50" E 289.11 ' L2 N 56°21 '25" E 263.32' L3 S 33°38'35" E 40.00' L4 N 56021 '25- E 207.57' L5 S 52°35'32" W 215.01 ' L6 N 07°21 '17" W 15.75' CURVE DATA CI C2 A - 44°53'20" A 11010'35- L - 519.58' L - 558.82' R - 663. 19' R 2.864.79' PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY J 7BE STATE ROAD N0. 510 - PARCEL 480 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CARDNO TBE PREPARED by, 113 3427 N.N. SStn STREET er DAlE DAIA SOVRCE. IT. LAUDERDALE. IrL. 33309 DRAW C YILIER 03.07-J3 — IrApnmn CARDNO TBE N/A h+0NE--9S,-939-9399 LB•Ki! „_____ __ __ TRF PN. nSn1R-nn9-nn Icurry o nr SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003. 0 B. ANDERS NYQUIST, ( TR ) ORB 970 PG 349 STATE ROAD 510 RIGHT-OF -WAY PARCEL 480 STATE ROAD 510 RIGHT-OF-WAY PARCEL 480 A PORTION OF LOT 3, "NARANJA TRACT SHELLMOUND BEACH", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I , PAGE 6. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA, LYING IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA. SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS? COMMENCE AT THE SOUTH OAURTER CORNER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. SAID POINT BEING ON THE SURVEY BASELINE FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 AS SHOWN ON THE UNRECORDED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 (WABASSO ROAD), SHEET 8 OF 101 THENCE SOUTH 89055'50" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 28 AND THE SAID SURVEY BASELINE, A DISTANCE OF 289. 11 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWESTI THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE. HAVING A RADIUS OF 663. 19 FEET. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°53'20". AN ARC DISTANCE OF 519.58 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY= THENCE NORTH 45010'50" EAST, ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, A DISTANCE OF 1 .062.02 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST= THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2.864.79 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11.10'35 AN ARC DISTANCE OF 558.82 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCYS THENCE NORTH 56°21 '25" EAST, ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE. A DISTANCE OF 263.32 FEET= THENCE SOUTH 33°38'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 510 AND A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND OWNED BY B. ANDERS NYQUIST, (TR). AS RECORDED 1N OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 970, PAGE 349, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING= THENCE NORTH 56021 '25" EAST, ALONG SAID EXISTING SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 207.57 FEETI THENCE SOUTH 52035-32- WEST. A DISTANCE OF 215.01 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCELI THENCE NORTH 07021 '17" WEST. ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF B. ANDERS NYQUIST PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 15.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 1 .465 SOUARE FEET (0.034 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY V ' 7DE STATE ROAD NO. 510 - PARCEL 480 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CARDNOTBE PREPARED Bre DATA Sg1RCE. 114 3+27 N.W. SStn STREET Br DATE FT. LAUDERDALE. FL. 33309 CARDHO TBE N/A ►r+ONE••95,-938-9319 11 C MILLER 03.07. 3 LB•6868r ti. ,,, ,_ _. „- ,. CARDNO TBE PN, 05038-002-00 SHEET 3 OF 3 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003 . 0 B. ANDERS NYOUIST, ( TR ) �� ' ' ORB 970 PG 349 STATE ROAD 510 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 780 SURVEYOR'S NOTES: I . THIS 1S NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. BEARINGS SHOWN BASED ON CENTERLINE OF STATE ROAD 510 AND SOUTH LINE OF THE S.E. 1 /4 OF SECTION 281 SAID LINE BEARS S 89°55'50" E. 3. DISTANCES SHOWN BASED ON ENGLISH UNITS, US SURVEY FOOT. 4. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH 1S BASED ON THE PRELIMINARY RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 (WABASSO ROAD). PREPARED BY BURDETTE AND ASSOCIATES. DATED "FINAL GMB 3-08". CONSISTING OF 10 SHEETS AS DIRECTED BY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA. 5. THE SCALE OF THIS DRAWING MAY HAVE BEEN DISTORTED DURING REPRODUCTION PROCESS. LEGEND @ . BASELINE C.R. • COUNTY ROAD D.E. . DRAINAGE EASEMENT A • DELTA FND. . FOUND L • ARC LENGT+I O.R.B. . OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK P.B. • PLAT BOOK PG. . PAGE ? • PROPERTY LINE P.O.B. . POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. . POINT OF COMMENCEMENT R . RADIUS R/W . RIGHT-OF-WAY SEC. • SECTION S.R. • STATE ROAD T.C.E. • TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT CERTIFICATIONF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 1S TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. FURTHER, THIS DOCUMENT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA STATUTES. FOR THE FIRM, ---------------------------------------------- CHRISTOPHER P. MILLER. PSM FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER 5921 CARDNO TBE cj7> PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY 7'13E STATE ROAD NO. 510 - PARCEL 780 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CARDNO TS[ -ARCD Br. DATA SDUxfI. 342T N.W. SSfM STRUT BY DATE CARDNO TBE N/A �� FT. LAUDERDALE, PL. 33309 "ONE••9SA-93i-9319 1 DRAIN E 4�LLER D3-07.11 La."" tWtKFi1 u -"" �l•. �' CARDNO TBE PNv 0503 8-002-00 SHEET I OF 3 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003. 0 B. ANDERS . NYQUIST, ( TR ) ORB 970 PG 3.49 STATE ROAD 510 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 780 NARANJA TRACT SHELLMOUND BEACH M P.B. I . PG. 6 OD zo \ ?�0�� tNG%O N� SSP P P P�Gp v� w N � 11 100' P�AGGo\RUMENS- r� D•E' p,SE• ��880 `0 �o r \,0� gAs pNO�R PARCEL h� j LINE NY Opts Q'p� WE.s DERS EL ,i pQ� r F. 6 y p�s� E'S UT NERLV EST ERL� J�Oy� x'01. ExtsZ R W �tNE EXtS�RN* t SNA E p� O 28 L1 B. ANDERS NYOUIST, (TR) S 89°5 '50" E O.R.B. 970. PG. 349 33 SECTION LINE 8 31392700003000000003.0 @ SURVEY C.R. 510 (WABASSO RD. ) .0.C. L I NE DATA S. 1 /4 CORNER LINEI BEARING DISTANCE SEC. 28-31 -39 FND- BOAT SPIKE LI S 89055'50" E 289. 11 ' L2 N 56021 '25" E 255.91 ' L3 S 33038'35" E 55.00' L4 N 56921 '25" E R2788' L5 S 28026'23" E L6 S 56021 '25" W L7 N 07°21 ' 17" W CURVE DATA CI C2 A - 44053'20" A - 11010'35- L - 519.58' L 558.82' R • 663. 19' R 2,864.79' PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY �( J 7BE STATE ROAD NO. 510 - PARCEL 780 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY L•ARDND T8[ "REp-BT. DATA SOURCE. 116 3427 N. SSsn STREET er DATE FT. L!UDERDAL E. 'L- 33309 DRAFT C MILLER 03-D7-IJ CARDNO TBE NTA i•�+ON[••954_930-9 399 LB-6668 ,,,„,, „� ,�� CARDNO TBE PNT 05038-002-00 [RCPT 7 nF t SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003 . 0 B. ANDERS NYQUIST, ( TR ) ORB 970 PG 349 STATE ROAD 510 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 780 STATE ROAD 510 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PARCEL 780 A PORTION OF LOTS 3 AND 13, "NARANJA TRACT SHELLMOUND BEACH". ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I . PAGE 6, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTH OAURTER CORNER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. SAID POINT BEING ON THE SURVEY BASELINE FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 AS SHOWN ON THE UNRECORDED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RIGHT—OF—WAY MAP FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 (WABASSO ROAD), SHEET 8 OF IOc THENCE SOUTH 89055'50" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 28 AND THE SAID SURVEY BASELINE. A DISTANCE OF 289. 11 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST= THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 663. 19 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44053'20". AN ARC DISTANCE OF 519.58 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY= THENCE NORTH 45010'50" EAST, ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, A DISTANCE OF 1 ,062.02 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2.864.79 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11 °10'35". AN ARC DISTANCE OF 558.82 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY= THENCE NORTH 56°21 '25" EAST. ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, A DISTANCE OF 255.91 FEET= THENCE SOUTH 33038'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND OWNED BY B. ANDERS NYOUIST, (TR). AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 970. PAGE 349, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA. SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING= THENCE NORTH 56°21 '25" EAST. A DISATNCE OF 269.82 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WESTERLY RIGHT-OF—WAY LINE OF SHORE LANE AND A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 28°26'23" EAST, ALONG SAID EXISTING WESTERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE AND SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 25. 10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56°21 '25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 279.89 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCEL; THENCE NORTH 07021 '17" WEST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF '27.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 6.871 SQUARE FEET (0. 158 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. C J Certlno PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY 733E STATE ROAD NO. 510 - PARCEL 780 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY �J CARDND T&E P-PAKO BY BATA SBUIKE. 11 / 3427 N.W. SS►n STREET By BAT; CAR FT. LAUDERDALE. FL. 33309 DNO TBE N/A M.ONE••9S4.93/-9309 C YIILER 03-07-IS LO•bi6i rurnrCARDNO TBE PNt 05038-002-00 SHEET 3 OF 3 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003. 0 B. ANDERS NYOUIST, ( TR ) ORB 970 PG 349 STATE ROAD 510 IT DRAINAGE EASEMENT 880 EX H B (2f SURVEYOR'S NOTES: I . THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. BEARINGS SHOWN BASED ON CENTERLINE OF STATE ROAD 510 AND SOUTH LINE OF THE S.E. 1 /4 OF SECTION 28= SAID LINE BEARS S 89055'50" E. 3. DISTANCES SHOWN BASED ON ENGLISH UNITS, US SURVEY FOOT. 4. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH IS BASED ON THE PRELIMINARY RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 (WABASSO ROAD). PREPARED BY BURDETTE AND ASSOCIATES. DATED "FINAL GMB 3-08% CONSISTING OF 10 SHEETS AS DIRECTED BY INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 5. THE SCALE OF THIS DRAWING MAY HAVE BEEN DISTORTED DURING REPRODUCTION PROCESS. LI 1� @ • BASELINE C.R. COUNTY ROAD D.E. - DRAINAGE EASEMENT 0 - DELTA FND. FOUND L ARC LENGTH O.R.B. OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK P.B. PLAT BOOK PG. PAGE ? PROPERTY LINE P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT R - RADIUS R/W - RIGHT-OF-WAY SEC. SECTION S.R. - STATE ROAD T.C.E. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. FURTHER, THIS DOCUMENT 1S IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA STATUTES. FOR THE FIRM. ---------------------------------------------- CHRISTOPHER P. MILLER. PSM FLORIDA REGISTRATION NUMBER 5921 CARDNO TBE V J cmlw o PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY 7BE STATE ROAD NO. 510 - PARCEL 880 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1p ckkot4O TdE PREPARED 81• DATA-RCE, 110 3427 N.W. SS*h STREET 6t DAtt FT. LAUDERDALE. FL. 33309 CARDN0 TBE N/A FMONE-•9S+•931-9309 DRAMs C MILLER 03•DT-IS L6•ssss „•,,�_ „.-„•-,• CARDNO TBE PNt 05038-002-00 SHEET 1 OF 3 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003. 0 B. ANDERS NYOUIST, ( TR ) ORB 970 PG 349 STATE ROAD 510 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 880 NARANJA TRACT SHELLMOUND BEACH m P.B. 1 . PG. 6 M \ / r 9 CID io \ o9F Np NpN� SFe P P P�C� vo N J W Q 1 , 100' DOCOM� `O �1 �_ S�PpRpS cE� Zg0 j �o L�r1E p pR EAS ANQER P pRCEL NY 001ST Q.•p� V(ES pERs E1. y OQO r F. N(OV 1 S� P 5 Uj NERC I WESTERLY `iJQ.POy� ` h0'l. EX15T R 1W �IN� EX�SjRNW E 1Np E O SHpR �' 28 LI B. ANDERS NYOUIST. (TR) 33 S 89055'50" E 310392 00003000000003 0 SECTION LINE 8 9 SURVEY C.R. 510 (WABASSO RD. ) .D.C. L I NE DATA S. 1 /4 CORNER LINEI BEARING DISTANCE SEC. 28-31 -39 FND. BOAT SPIKE LI S 89055'50" E 289. 11 ' L2 N 56021 '25" E 256.35' L3 S 33038'35" E 54. 12' L4 N 52'35'32" E 215.01 ' L5 N 56021 '25" E 56.20' L6 S 28°26'23" E 15.06' L7 S 56°21 '25" W 269.82' CURVE DATA 1-8 N 07021 ' I7" W 0.98' Cl C2 A 44°53'20" A - 11010'35- L 519.58' L - 558.82' R - 663. 19' R - 2,864.79' PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY TBE STATE ROAD NO. 510 - PARCEL 880 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CA D40 TOE PREPARED BY. DAIA Sd7rtCE� 3427 N.M. 55*t7 STREET er °QTc 119 FT. LAUDERDALE. FL. 33309 CARDNO Te[ N/A P"ONE-•954.930-9389 DRA►1 C MILLER 03-07.13 LO.66" dffUcED 4 SORER$ 03-M-i3 CARDNO TBE PNS 05038-002-00 SHEET 2 OF 3 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 31392700003000000003. 0 B. ANDERS NYOUIST , ( TR ) ORB 970 PG 349 STATE ROAD 510 DRAINAGE EASEMENT 880 STATE ROAD 510 DRAINAGE EASEMENT PARCEL 880 A PORTION OF LOT 3. "NARANJA TRACT SHELL MOUND BEACH", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I . PAGE 6. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTH OAURTER CORNER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SURVEY BASELINE FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 AS SHOWN ON THE UNRECORDED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP FOR COUNTY ROAD 510 (WABASSO ROAD), SHEET 8 OF 10i THENCE SOUTH 89055'50" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 28 AND THE SAID SURVEY BASELINE, A DISTANCE OF 289. 11 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST= THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 663. 19 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44053'20". AN ARC DISTANCE OF 519.58 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 45°10'50" EAST, ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, A DISTANCE OF 1 .062.02 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,864.79 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11010'35", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 558.82 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 56°21 '25" EAST, ALONG SAID SURVEY BASELINE, A DISTANCE OF 256.35 FEET= THENCE SOUTH 33038'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 54.12 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND OWNED BY B. ANDERS NYOUIST. (TR), AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 970. PAGE 349. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. FLORIDA. SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING% THENCE NORTH 52035'32" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 215.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 5101 THENCE NORTH 56021 '25" EAST, ALONG SAID EXISTING SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. A DISATNCE OF 56.20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EXISTING WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SHORE LANE AND A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 28°26'23" EAST, ALONG SAID EXISTING WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND SAID EASTERLY LINE OF SAID B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 15.06 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56'21 '25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 269.82 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCEL; THENCE NORTH 07°21 '17" WEST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF B. ANDERS NYOUIST PARCEL, A DISTANCE OF 0.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2.537 SQUARE FEET (0.058 ACRES) MORE OR LESS. 4;Z / dnO PARCEL SKETCH - NOT A SURVEY ME STATE ROAD 140. 510 - PARCEL 680 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY C ARONO T&Esr °Arc PREPARED by. DATA S-1 3427 H.W. SSTn STREET ARDNO TBE N/A FT. LANDEROALEC , FL. 33309 DRAW C MILLER OS-07.17 120 PM049 4- 9 139- 399 L9.66••9SCHECKED Y SOEHS 03-00.13 CARDNO TBE PNi 05038-002-00 SHEET 3 OF 3 CONSENT AGENDA va\r1?C, l INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ... AGENDA ITEM Office of Assistant County Administrator Department of General Services TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Michael Zito, Assistant County Administrator FROM: Brad Bernauer, Human Services Director) DATE: February 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Children's Services Advisory Committee's Annual Report, 2013-2014. BACKGROUND: The Children's Services Advisory Committee met on January 12, 2015 and approved the Annual Report For October 1, 2013—September 30, 2014. The Annual Report supplies the following information: • Names of members of the Children's Services Advisory Committee, the Grant Review Subcommittee and Needs Assessment Subcommittee • An overview of the history,mission and goals of the committee • Changes that have occurred during the year • A synopsis of funds expended • A report on each agency and program, including the number of children served and the cost per child. • Grant funds received and amount of funds expended • Progress towards goals set in the grant application • The total number of children served A Copy of the Children's Services Advisory Committee Annual Report is available in the Board of County Commissioners Office and is also available in the scanned version of the February 10, 2015 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Packet found at: http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/BCC/2015/agendas/BCC RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Board accept the Annual Report for 2013-14, as submitted. Indian River Co Approved Date APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Admin -2 S J FOR: February 10,2015 Legal Budget 5 s BY; Department Jose A. Baird,County Administrator Risk Manager 121 - � tke CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ' i C +� ��• MEMORANDUM m Assistant County Administrator/ Department of General Services To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Ak Thru: Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator From: Brad Bernauer, Human Services Director1w Date: January 28, 2015 Subject: Children's Services Advisory Committee's Needs Assessment BACKGROUND: The Children Services Advisory Committee through the Health Council of Southeast Florida has conducted a Needs Assessment for the children of Indian River County. The Needs sub-committee invited approximately 30 individuals from a variety of community organizations, all of whom have some interest in the development of the children in our county to participate in a number of meetings with HCSEF and the CSAC sub-committee. Additionally, HCSEF met with a number of community leaders and held a number of Focus groups throughout the county to obtain local input. On February 2, 2015, the Needs sub-committee presented their findings to the CSAC who approved this Needs Assessment. A Copy of the Indian River County Children's Assessment 2014 report is available in the Board of County Commissioners Office and is also available in the scanned version of the February 10, 2015 Board of County Commissioners Agenda Packet found at: http://www.ircgov.com/Boards/BCC/2015/agendas/BCC RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approval of this Needs Assessment as a guide to funding agencies and program agencies for addressing the most current needs for the development of the Indian River County children. ATTACHMENTS: Executive Summary-2014-2015 Children's Needs Assessment 2015 CSAC Focus Areas Approved Agenda Item r Indian River Co. Approved Date BY: Administration Joseph A. Baird County Attorney -�{ i County Administrator Budget 2 r5 Department FOR: February 10, 2015 Risk Management FAAssistant County Administrator\AGENDA ITEMS\2015\BCC 02 FEB 2015\BCC Memo -CSAC Needs Assessment.doc 122 Executive Summary 2014-15 Children's Needs Assessment Introduction: This 2014-15 IRC Children's Needs Assessment has provided valuable information to help guide the Child Services Advisory Committee (CSAC) and other local grant makers on the needs and priorities to ensure the well being of children in IRC. The Health Council of Southeast Florida was engaged by the County to gather the empirical data, conduct key informant interviews with experts in the community, conduct focus groups (engaging 98 members of the community) and coordinate and conduct the Advisory Team meetings. It is important to note that the Advisory Team was made up of 30 members representing a broad cross-section of community leaders. Additional data compiled by the United Way ALICE Project and the Kindergarten Readiness Collaborative has also been reviewed as part of this process. This Executive Summary was written by the members of the Children's Services Advisory Committee Needs Assessment Sub-Committee to summarize what we believe are the most important insights from this process. Key Insights: The Indian River County Children's Needs Assessment, conducted for the first time since 2006, shows increases in poverty along with decreases in educational opportunities and outcomes. There are approximately 28,600 children under the age of 19 in Indian River County (IRC) of which 18,100 are enrolled in our public school system (SDIRC). The report shows the impact on these children, as well as the community at large. Since the last report in 2006, the number of children under 18 living in poverty has increased from 16%to 21% and the number of children eligible for free or reduced school lunch has risen to almost 57%. Single mothers now account for 46% of births in IRC. The 2014 United Way ALICE report (www. unitedwayirc.org) details the significant poverty indicators in IRC - and should be read independently. If this cycle of poverty continues, there will be major implications for the County's future. The study also pinpointed areas with deep pockets of poverty in Fellsmere, Gifford, Highlands,Wabasso and parts of Central Vero. In these areas, the statistics are even more stunning. Families in these pockets are geographically dispersed and have racial and cultural differences. Focus group interviews indicate that people in these pockets may not be aware of, do not want to, or may not be able to leave these pockets to access services that could benefit them. While IRC already has one of the highest gaps between rich and poor, this gap will likely widen as data shows the younger generation is increasingly uneducated. For example, 21.5% of 18-24 year olds and 20.7% of 25-34 year olds have less than a high school degree, 1 123 as compared to almost 14.3% in the 35-44 age group. Conversely, the percentage of residents with a Bachelors Degree is shrinking. Our birth statistics highlight the issue of the pockets. Eight percent of mothers receive either 3rd trimester or no prenatal care (compared to 5% in Florida) and are concentrated in the pockets.At the same time, our infant mortality rate exceeds the State and is driven by infant mortality rates among blacks that are 8x that of whites in IRC. Opportunities for early childhood education are also lacking. There is no Early Head Start Program (except for a small RCMA program in Fellsmere) and Head Start funds for 3-year olds have been reduced. While there are a sufficient number of child care slots, many parents cannot afford to send their children and there are disparities in the quality of the various providers. There is also a shortage of infant/toddler slots - and most care is at home or with family/neighbors. The Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten and K-12 programs also have significant problems. Twenty-nine percent of our children are "not ready" to attend Kindergarten. This is even worse in the poverty pocket areas where this number rises to 66%. 44% of our 3rd graders are reading below grade level. While we have a better high school graduation rate than the State (79.1%vs. 76.1%), it has been decreasing (85% in 2006). While child abuse and neglect statistics have improved, including a reduction in foster care placements (with the exception of children 5-11), focus groups highlighted weak parenting skills and lack of parent involvement. The stress on single parent, dual parent working households and households with unemployment, is very high. Statistics on our youth are troubling. It appears that they are not going to school at the rate they should and are engaging in risky behavior ruinous to their futures. We have chronic school absenteeism of 11.1%. Our school suspension rate, bullying, and teen pregnancy exceed State averages. Tobacco, marijuana and alcohol use in Middle and High Schools also exceed State averages. It should be highlighted that there has been a material improvement in the alcohol and tobacco statistics for IRC since 2006 -which may be a result of the LifeSkills program. LifeSkills, an evidence based prevention program given to all IRC 6th, 7th and 8th graders, is a unique collaboration between Substance Awareness Center and SDIRC. We need to ask why our youth is so unhappy and disconnected.We heard in our interviews that there is a lack of out of school activities, particularly for those 12+. Most that exist require parents to pay for them and deliver the children to practice and games (baseball, soccer, etc.). This is difficult if one can't afford it and lack transportation to get there. A single mother who is worrying how to pay the bills can't get organized to get her children to activities. Notable positive exceptions to this are Boys & Girls Club, Gifford Youth Achievement Center, Youth Guidance and other programs. Another message we heard loudly in the interviews is that there is a lack of awareness by end users of the available resources. We have some very good services in IRC and people 2 124 may not be aware of them.Additionally,while services do exist, they are open M-F and 9-5 (or earlier),which is not when parents are available. While not a new issue, the lack of public transportation and school bussing of students with one late bus, means travel is long, difficult and impossible after 6:30 if you don't have a car. Focus Areas (in order of prioritization) Analyzing the data presented, the Advisory Team was guided through a prioritization and voting process to determine what the focus areas should be for Children's Services Advisory Council. 1. Early Childhood Development This encompasses birth to age 5. For the younger children this would mean improving the interactions they have beginning at birth with their caregivers. It would include improving the quality (and transparency of relative quality) at childcare, PreK and Voluntary PreK providers as well as improving financial accessibility to by leveraging available federal and state funds. Why: Research shows that the period 0-5 is the most important time for brain development and cognitive and emotional skills can be significantly impacted. 2. Build Parent CanacitX This encompasses improving parenting skills at every age of a child's life and providing support mechanisms for parents. A priority would be new parents, in particular first time and single parents, and those in the poverty pockets. Why: A parent is a child's first and most important teacher.We need to equip parents to be the good parents that they all want to be. Note that the Kindergarten Readiness Collaborative is working on specific recommendations on both Priority 1 and 2. Currently they are doing best practice site visits throughout Florida. Recommendations should be available in April. 3. Out of school recreational activities and enrichment programs They need to be free/affordable and accessible (transportation) to parents and children. Where possible, they should include a literacy/tutoring component. Mentoring programs are included. There is a large gap of programs for children 12+. Why: Children need to develop positive out of school outlets that keep them engaged in school, promote their health and provide connections (to sports/hobbies, a person or group, etc). There is a wealth of data supporting extended day and extended year programs. 3 125 4. Middle and High School pr grams that address risky behavior It appears that the LifeSkills class in middle school has had a positive impact. We need to investigate how something like this can be continued into high school as well as expanded to include delinquent behavior, teen pregnancy, STDs, bullying etc. Why: There is a lot of at risk behavior and we need to ensure that it is addressed early and repeatedly. Taking the Long Term View We believe the community (politicians, agencies, philanthropists, employers, parents, etc.) must start taking a long-term view focusing 15-25 years out. We have a cycle of poverty in IRC that has been increasing and needs to be broken. We believe interventions should start as early as possible in a child's life in order to have the greatest impact. That is why our top two priorities are Early Childhood Development and Building Parent Capacity. We also must ensure IRC is using national best practices. This would include investing in interventions that are scalable, evidence based and cost efficient. With the internet, best practices are easy to access. For example, NIEER (National Association for Early Education Research) sets standards and rates all 50 states PreK programs.Additionally, the IRC Funders Forum (Funder Collaborative) has recently funded a best practices education series for Agency Executive Directors and their boards. Collaboration in the community is essential and can help optimize human and financial resources, expose and eliminate overlap.A shared voice can make sure the top priorities are addressed. We have several excellent examples of collaboration in IRC - the Moonshot Moment (collaboration between SDIRC, Learning Alliance and 40 other organizations), Life Skills (collaboration between SDIRC and Substance Awareness Center) as well as the Mental Health Collaborative and TC Homeless Services Council. Given that IRC poverty is in geographically disbursed pockets and that we have unique transportation problems,we must always keep in mind that services need to be available where and when people need and can access them.We also must also utilize the best mediums to clearly communicate what,when and where these services are available. IRC has fallen behind other central Florida counties in its investment in children. All other counties on the Treasure Coast have a Children's Services Council whose funds, raised locally, enable them to leverage additional federal and state matching funds (School Readiness, Early Head Start, etc.) Therefore,we need to take a hard look at the financial resources in IRC dedicated to our children. The complete report is attached: 4 126 2/3/158:42 AM RFP Focus Areas Introduction• The 2014 IRC Children's Needs Assessment has provided valuable information to help guide the Child Services Advisory Committee (CSAC). The following outlines what will be considered for all grant requests. Larger Picture The community must start taking a long-term view focusing 15-25 years out. We have a cycle of poverty in IRC that has been increasing and needs to be broken. Interventions should start as early as possible in a child's life in order to have the greatest impact. IRC agencies should use best practices. a. Evidence based with measurable outcomes over time b. Cost effective/efficient c. Skilled executive, program, and board leadership d. Strong fiscal management e. Opportunity for broad impact (replicable, scalable, leveragable) Focus should be on the pockets of poverty. Given that IRC poverty is in geographically disbursed pockets and that we have unique transportation problems,we must always keep in mind that services need to be available where and when people need and can access them. We must utilize the best mediums to clearly communicate what, when and where these services are available Collaboration in the community is essential and can help optimize human and financial resources, expose and eliminate overlap. We are supportive of the IRC Funders Forum hosting a series of educational workshops to be conducted by Nonprofits First.Additional preference will be given to agencies that participate in these workshops. The considerations highlighted above have precedence over the actual CSAC Focus Areas listed below. 2015 CSAC Focus Areas (ranked in order by the Advisory Team at the completion of the Needs Assessment process.) 1. Early Childhood Development This encompasses birth to age 5. For the younger children this would mean improving the interactions they have beginning at birth with their caregivers. It would include improving the quality (and transparency of relative quality) at childcare, PreK and Voluntary PreK 1 127 2/3/158:42 AM providers as well as improving financial accessibility to by leveraging available federal and state funds. Why: Research shows that the period 0-5 is the most important time for brain development and cognitive and emotional skills can be significantly impacted. 2. Build Parent Capacity This encompasses improving parenting skills at every age of a child's life and providing support mechanisms for parents. A priority would be new parents in particular first time and single parents and those in the poverty pockets. Why: A parent is a child's first and most important teacher. We need to equip parents to be the good parents that they all want to be. 3. Out of school recreational activities and enrichment programs They need to be free/affordable and accessible (transportation) to parents and children. Where possible, they should include a literacy/tutoring component. Mentoring programs are included.There is a large gap of programs for children 12+. Why: Children need to develop positive out of school outlets that keep them engaged in school, promote their health and provide connections (to sports/hobbies, a person or group, etc). There is a wealth of data supporting extended day and extended year. 4. Middle and High School programs that address risky behavior It appears that the LifeSkills class in middle school has had a positive impact. We need to investigate how programs like this can be continued into high school as well as include delinquent behavior, teen pregnancy, STDs, bullying etc. Why: There is a lot of at risk behavior and we need to ensure that it is addressed early and repeatedly. 2 128 a- �o•z�15 I n d Ja � f Children ' s Assessment 2014 i 1 41 gg�� • 4 �'.• �:1 � '•�� r / j�. ,Yid i r y e v 9 t ti RIGY .r Deputy e - I�8 . Indian River County Children's Assessment 2014 HCSEF Contributing Staff Andrea Stephenson, MBA, MHS HEF Executive Director Health Council of Odeth O'Meally PhD, MPH, RDN Southeast Florida Director of Planning Bertholette Pardieu, MPH, CPHRM Special Projects Coordinator Health Council of Southeast Florida 600 Sandtree Drive, Suite 101 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33403 Phone: 561.844.4220 Website: www.hcsef.org L-- 1�'52. Table of Contents Tableof Tables..................................................................................................................................................................3 Tableof Figures.................................................................................................................................................................7 ExecutiveSummary..........................................................................................................................................................8 Methodology....................................................................................................................................................................10 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................................11 Demographic& Socioeconomic Profile.........................................................................................................................11 TotalPopulation...........................................................................................................................................................12 PopulationGrowth.......................................................................................................................................................12 ChildPopulation..........................................................................................................................................................13 Race/Ethnicity..................................................................................................................................................................13 PopulationGrowth...........................................................................................................................................................14 Populationby Household............................................................................................................................................14 Children and Families Living in Poverty.....................................................................................................................15 Earnings.......................................................................................................................................................................17 FamilyIncome.............................................................................................................................................................18 Costof Living...............................................................................................................................................................19 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)..................................................................................................21 Homelessness.............................................................................................................................................................22 HomelessStudents.....................................................................................................................................................23 HomelessYouth..........................................................................................................................................................23 Healthand Behavior Profile............................................................................................................................................25 HealthInsurance.........................................................................................................................................................25 Uninsured.........................................................................................................................................................................25 Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and Medicaid Enrollment.....................................................................26 Maternaland Child Health Indicators.........................................................................................................................27 TotalBirths.......................................................................................................................................................................27 Birthsby Mother's Education..........................................................................................................................................27 Birthsby Mother's Race..................................................................................................................................................28 TeenPregnancy..............................................................................................................................................................29 PrenatalCare...................................................................................................................................................................31 BirthWeight.....................................................................................................................................................................33 InfantMortality.................................................................................................................................................................35 ChildhoodMortality..........................................................................................................................................................37 SexuallyTransmitted Diseases......................................................................................................................................38 VaccinePreventable Diseases.......................................................................................................................................39 Immunizations..................................................................................................................................................................39 EntericDisease ...........................................................................................................................................................40 Accessto Dental Care....................................................................................................................................................42 WICParticipation.............................................................................................................................................................42 Overweightand Obesity..................................................................................................................................................43 MentalHealth and Substance Abuse.........................................................................................................................45 TobaccoUse....................................................................................................................................................................45 AlcoholUse......................................................................................................................................................................46 SubstanceUse................................................................................................................................................................48 1 � 1 .8. 3 Education.........................................................................................................................................................................50 SchoolEnrollment.......................................................................................................................................................50 Attendance...................................................................................................................................................................50 Graduationrates..........................................................................................................................................................51 KindergartenReadiness.............................................................................................................................................52 Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test(FCAT)...................................................................................................54 StudentsNot Promoted...............................................................................................................................................56 GraduationRates........................................................................................................................................................56 DropoutRate...............................................................................................................................................................57 StabilityRate................................................................................................................................................................57 Suspension..................................................................................................................................................................58 Freeand Reduced Lunch...........................................................................................................................................59 GiftedProgram............................................................................................................................................................62 EmotionallyHandicapped Students...........................................................................................................................62 Post-graduation Follow-up..........................................................................................................................................63 Expendituresper Student...........................................................................................................................................63 Scholarships................................................................................................................................................................64 ExtracurricularActivities..............................................................................................................................................66 ChildWelfare...................................................................................................................................................................66 Abuseand Neglect......................................................................................................................................................66 Reunifications..............................................................................................................................................................67 FosterCare..................................................................................................................................................................67 Grandparents...............................................................................................................................................................70 OtherChild Well-Being ...............................................................................................................................................71 Bullying.............................................................................................................................................................................71 SchoolSafety and Violent Acts......................................................................................................................................71 JuvenileDelinquency......................................................................................................................................................73 GroupQuarters................................................................................................................................................................77 MarriageDissolutions..................................................................................................................................................79 DomesticViolence.......................................................................................................................................................80 CommunityPerspective..................................................................................................................................................81 Overview......................................................................................................................................................................81 Key Informant Interviews- Methodology...................................................................................................................81 Key Informant Interviews—Results& Common Themes.........................................................................................82 FocusGroups-Methodology.....................................................................................................................................86 FocusGroups-Participant Information.....................................................................................................................87 FocusGroup- Results&Common Themes.............................................................................................................89 Prioritizationof Needs.....................................................................................................................................................94 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................................................96 Glossary...........................................................................................................................................................................97 Appendices......................................................................................................................................................................99 AppendixA....................................................................................................................................................................99 AppendixB...................................................................................................................................................................100 AppendixC...................................................................................................................................................................101 ForMore Information.....................................................................................................................................................102 2 1 P — fn (Iian Ride � �� _ �: z , ;tiiClrei essrr, e �fi 2pi - J 411�8-Lk Table of Tables Table 1:Total Population, Indian River and Florida, 2013................................................................................... 12 Table 2: Population Growth, Indian River County, Florida, 2000 to 2013............................................................ 12 Table 3:Child Population by Age and Sex Indian River County, 2013.................................................................. 13 Table 4:Child Population by Race and Ethnicity, Indian River and Florida, 2012................................................. 13 Table 5:Child Population Growth,Ages 0-18, Indian River County and Florida, 2000 and 2013.......................... 14 Table 6: Households by Household Type, Indian River and Florida, 2013............................................................ 14 Table 7: Poverty Thresholds for 2013 by Size of Family and Number of Related Children Under 18 Years, Indian River.................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Table 8: Families With Children Whose Income in the Past 12 Months is Below the Poverty Level, Indian River andFlorida,2013............................................................................................................................................... 16 Table 9:Children Living Below the Poverty Level, Indian River and Florida, 2013................................................ 16 Table 10: Earning in the Past 12 Months in Indian River, 2013 ........................................................................... 17 Table 11: Family Income, Indian River and Florida,2013.................................................................................... 18 Table 12: Cost of Living Index Values, Indian River area and National, 2014....................................................... 19 Table 13:Average Prices on Household Goods and Services, Indian River area and National, 2014.................... 19 Table 14: Homeless People in Indian River and Florida,2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013....................................... 22 Table 15: Homeless Students in Indian River and Florida, 2008-09-2012-13..................................................... 23 Table 16: Homeless Youth by Age in Indian River,January 2014......................................................................... 23 Table 17: Homeless Youth by Race in Indian River,January 2014....................................................................... 24 Table 18: Health Insurance Estimates Individuals Under 19 Years of Age, Indian River, Florida, 2012................. 25 Table 19:Title XXI -Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Indian River, Florida, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. 26 Table 20:Title XIX-Medicaid, Indian River, Florida, 2010-2013......................................................................... 26 Table 21:Children<5 covered by KidCare (MediKids Medicaid) Indian River and Florida, 2010-2012 ................ 26 Table 22: Total Resident Live Births, Indian River and Florida, 2013 Counts and Rates....................................... 27 Table 23: Births to Mothers with Less than High School Education, Indian River, Florida, 2011, 2012, 2013 ....... 27 Table 24: Births by Race and Ethnicity of Mother in Indian River,2013 .............................................................. 28 Table 25: Births to Unwed Mothers, Indian River and Florida, 2003-2013 .......................................................... 28 Table 26: Births to Mothers Ages 10-14, Florida, Indian River,2010, 2011, 2012,2013 ...................................... 29 Table 27: Births to Mothers Ages 15-19, Florida, Indian River, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 ...................................... 30 Table 28: Prenatal Care, Indian River, Florida, 2011, 2012, 2013 ............................... .. .................. .....................31 Table 29: Births by Trimester Prenatal Care Started by Zip Code in Indian River, 2013........................................ 32 Table 30: Births by Race by Trimester Prenatal Care began in Indian River,2013 ...............................................32 Table 31: Less than Adequate Prenatal Care (Kotelchuck Index) by Ethnicity by Zip Code in Indian River, 2013..33 Table 32: Live Births under 2500 grams in Indian River and Florida, 2010, 2011,2012, 2013.............................. 33 Table 33: Live Births Under 1500 Grams, Indian River, Florida,2010, 2011, 2012, 2013......................................34 Table 34:Total Infant Mortality(0-364 days) in Indian River and Florida, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013...................... 35 Table 35: Infant Deaths per 1,000 Live Births by Race in Indian River and Florida, 2009-2013............................ 36 Table 36: Fetal Deaths per 1,000 Live Births, Florida by County, 2013................................................................36 Table 37:Childhood Deaths, Indian River, Florida, 2009,2010, 2011, 2012, 2013............................................... 37 3 � I ��S Table 38: Leading Rankable Causes of Childhood Deaths, Indian River and Florida,2013 ...................................37 Table 39:Bacterial STDs in Ages 15-19, Indian River, Florida,2010,2011, 2012, 2013........................................38 Table 40:Vaccine Preventable Diseases Rate for Vaccine-targeted Age Groups, Indian River, Florida, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 .................................................................... . Table 41: Immunization Levels in Kindergarteners, Indian River, Florida, 2009, 2010, 2011,2012, 2013.............39 Table 42: Enteric Disease Cases in Children under 6, Indian River, Florida,2010, 2011, 2012 .............................40 Table 43: Enteric Disease Cases in Day Care Centers, Indian River, Florida, 2010, 2011, 2012............................41 Table 44:Access to Dental Care by Low Income Persons,All Ages, Indian River, Florida, 2010,2011,2012 ........42 Table 45:WIC Eligibles Served, Indian River, Florida,2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 ....................................................42 Table 46:WIC children > 1 Who are Overweight or Obese, Indian River and Florida, 2010, 2011, 2012..............43 Table 47: Middle School Students Who Are Obese, Indian River, Florida,2008, 2010, 2012 ...............................43 Table 48: High School Students Who Are Obese, Indian River, Florida,2008, 2010, 2012...................................44 Table 49: Middle School Students Without Sufficient Vigorous Physical Activity, Indian River and Florida,2008, 2010, 2012 ............................................: .......................................... Table 50: High School Students Without Sufficient Vigorous Physical Activity, Indian River and Florida,2008, 2010, 2012 ........................ ..................................... .............................. . Table 51: Middle School Students Who Report Smoking Cigarettes in the Past 30 Days, Indian River, Florida, . . 2002-2014............................. .......................................................... . . ............ . . . .............. 45 Table 52:High School Students Who Report Smoking Cigarettes in the Past 30 Days, Indian River, Florida,2006- 2014............................................................... ............................................... . . . . Table 53:Middle School Students Who Report Having Used Alcohol in the Past 30 days, Indian River, Florida, 2004-2014................................... Table 54:Middle School Students Reporting Binge Drinking, Indian River, Florida,2004-2014...........................46 Table 55: High School Students Who Report Having Used Alcohol in the Past 30 days, 2004-2014.....................47 Table 56:High School Students Reporting Binge Drinking, 2004-2014................................................................47 Table 57:Middle School Students Who Report Using Marijuana/Hashish in the Past 30 Days, 2004-2014..........48 Table 58: High School Students Who Report Using Marijuana/Hashish in the Past 30 Days, 2004-2014..............48 Table 59:Students Who Reported Having Used Various drugs in Their Lifetimes, Indian River and Florida 2014 49 Table 60:School Enrollment, Indian River and Florida, 2013 ..............................................................................50 Table 61:Student Average Daily Attendance(ADA)/Average Daily Membership(ADM), 2012-2013 School Year ....................................... ........................................................................................... Table 62:Students Absent 21+Days, 2012-13 School Year....................................................... ............. 1 Table 63:Graduation Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Indian River, Florida, 2012-13 ....................................................51 Table 64:Florida Kindergarten Readiness Screener Results,2012-13 ................................................................. 52 Table 65:Calculated District Readiness Rates by School Site for Pre-K Program in Indian River Year 2012-2013 Based on Fall 2013............................. . . . ...................................................... . Table 66:Students Scoring 3 and Above on FCAT, Indian River, Florida,2013 and 2014..................................... 54 Table 67: FCAT Math, Indian River Schools, Percent Greater than or Equal to Level 3 in 2013 ............................ 54 Table 68:FCAT Reading, Indian River Schools, Percent Greater than or Equal to Level in 2013........................... 55 Table 69:Elementary and High School Students Not Promoted, Indian River and Florida, 2010,2011, 2012 ......56 Table 70: Federal High School Graduation Rates, Indian River and Florida,2009-10-2013-14........................... 56 Table 71:Single-Year,91h-12th Grade Dropout Rates, Indian River, Florida,2009-10--2013-14.......................... 57 4 i' ? - ) IlCila n R i / '' ;' r0un ': r l ! Idre1"i ' _ ass SSrt1 ' n [ 2 ?9 la �0(_1010 ,� Table 72:Stability Rates, Indian River and Florida, 2012 -2013.......................................................................... 57 Table 73:Total Suspensions,Counts and Rates, Indian River and Florida, 2012-13............................................. 58 Table 74:Total Suspensions,Counts and Rates, Indian River and Florida, 2011-2013......................................... 58 Table 75: PK-12 Students Eligible for Free/Reduced-Price Lunch, Indian River, Florida,2008-09- 2013-14......... 59 Table 76:Children in school-readiness programs eligible for free/reduced lunch, Indian River and Florida, 2008, 2009 and 2010................................................................................................................................................... 59 Table 77: Lunch Status by School, Indian River County,School Year 2013-2014.................................................. 60 Table 78:Table Percent of elementary school students eligible for free/reduced lunch, Indian River and Florida, 2011-2013......................................................................................................................................................... 61 Table 79: Percent of middle school students eligible for free/reduced lunch in Indian River and Florida, 2011- 2013.................................................................................................................................................................. 61 Table 80: Membership in Gifted Program, Fall 2012........................................................................................... 62 Table 81:Children in School Grades K-12 who are Emotionally Handicapped, Indian River, Florida, 2013........... 62 Table 82: Follow-Up of Prior Year Graduates, 2011-2012................................................................................... 63 Table 83:Current Expenditures per K-12 Unweighted Full Time Equivalent(FTE)Student, 2012-2013 ............... 63 Table 84: Bright Futures Scholarship Disbursements 1997-98—2013-14............................................................ 64 Table 85:Youth who Reported Participation in Extracurricular Activities, Indian River, Florida, 2014................. 66 Table 86:Children Experiencing Child Abuse Ages 5-11, Indian River, Florida, 2010, 2011, 2012 ........................ 66 Table 87:Verified Child Abuse Rate, Indian River, Florida, Fiscal Year 2012-13................................................... 67 Table 88:Children Discharged to Reunification with Parent(s)/Caretaker, Indian River, Florida, 2010, 2011, 2012 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 67 Table 89: Infants in Foster Care, Indian River, Florida 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012.......................................... 67 Table 90:Children in Foster Care,Ages 5-11, Indian River, Florida 2008,2009, 2010, 2011, 2012....................... 68 Table 91:Children in Foster Care,Ages 12-17, Indian River, Florida 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012..................... 70 Table 92:Grandparents Living with or Caring for Grandchildren, Indian River, Florida (5 year estimate 2008-2012) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 70 Table 93:Youth who Reported Involvement in Bullying Behavior, Indian River and Florida, 2014....................... 71 Table 94: Middle School and High School Students Who Reported Feeling Safe at School, Indian River, Florida, 2008, 2010, 2012...............................................................................................................................................71 Table 95:Violent acts per 1,000 students in school activities grades K-12, Indian River and Florida,2010, 2011, 2012.................................................................................................................................................................. 72 Table 96: High School Students Who Reported Having Seen Delinquent Behavior among Gang Members at School this Year, Indian River, Florida,2012....................................................................................................... 72 Table 97: Middle and High School Students who Reported Gang Membership, by Gender in Indian River and Florida, 2014...................................................................................................................................................... 72 Table 98:Youths Referred to Juvenile Justice (Total Offenses), Indian River, Florida, 2011-12, 2013-14............. 73 Table 99:Youths Referred to Juvenile Justice by Race and Gender, Indian River, Florida, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013- 14......................................................................................................................................................................73 Table 100:Youths Referred for Delinquency for a Felony Offense, Indian River, Florida, 2011-12- 2013-14.......74 Table 101:Youths Referred for Delinquency for a Misdemeanor Offense, Indian River, Florida, 2011-12-2013-14 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 74 Table 102:Youths Referred for Delinquency for Other Offenses, Indian River Florida, 2011-12- 2013-14.......... 74 5 � Table 103:Relative Rate Index compared with White Juveniles, Indian River,July 2012—June 2013.................. 76 Table 104:Group Quarters Population by Sex,Age and Type of Group Quarters in Indian River, 2010...............77 Table 105: Dissolutions of Marriage With Minor Children, Indian River, Florida,2009, 2010, 2011,2012 ........... 79 Table 106: Domestic Violence Offenses, Indian River, Florida, 2010,2011, 2012, 2013 ...................................... 80 Table 107: Focus Group Locations, Dates,Times,and Number of Participants ...................................................87 Table108: Focus Groups-Zip Codes..................................................................................................................87 Table109: Focus Groups-Gender.....................................................................................................................87 Table110: Focus Groups-Age...........................................................................................................................88 Table111: Focus Groups-Race ......................................................................................................................... 88 Table112: Focus Groups- Ethnicity...................................................................................................................88 Table 113: Focus Groups- Employment............................................................................................................88 Table 114: Focus Groups-Primary Language.....................................................................................................89 Table 115: Focus Groups- Educational Attainment............................................................................................89 6I P - j', CII ;ln v e ou 'i is 'i raf? ' s n t 011 I�V • E5 Table of Figures Figure 1: Monthly Averages for Years 2009-2012,TAN Benefits and Clients, Indian River County..................... 21 Figure 2: Monthly Averages for Years 2009-2012,TANF Benefits and Clients, Florida......................................... 22 Figure 3: Homeless Youth by race in Indian River,January 2014......................................................................... 24 Figure 4: Health Insurance Coverage, Individuals Under 19 Years of Age, 2012 .................................................. 25 Figure 5 Births to Mothers Ages 10-14, Rates and Counts, Indian River and Florida, 2001-2013 ......................... 29 Figure 6: Births to Mothers Ages 15-19,Counts and Rates, Indian River and Florida, 2001-2013........................ 30 Figure 7: Infant Deaths per 1,000 Live Births, Florida by County, 2013 ............................................................... 35 Figure 8: Immunization Levels, Counts and Rates, In Kindergarteners, Indian River County,2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013...............................................................................................................................................40 Figure 9: Bright Futures Scholarship Disbursements, Indian River, Florida 1997-98—2013-14............................ 65 Figure 10: Infants in Foster Care, Indian River, Florida 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012......................................... 68 Figure 11:Children in Foster Care,Ages 5-11, Indian River, Florida 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 ..................... 69 Figure 12:Children in Foster Care,Ages 12-17, Indian River, Florida 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011,2012.................... 69 Figure 13:Youths Referred to Juvenile Justice by Delinquency Type, Indian River, 2009-10- 2013-14................ 75 Figure 14: Institutionalized populations by group quarters in Indian River, 2010................................................ 78 Figure 15: Dissolutions of Marriage With Minor Children, Indian River, Florida,2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 .. 79 7 � 12B. 9 Executive Stmit l-Iry The 2014 Children's Assessment (the "Assessment") provides data and information on the status and wellbeing of children in the community. The Assessment provides information, which will aid in identifying unmet health and human service needs of the youth population and serve as a basis for planning activities. The Indian River County Children's Advisory Committee engaged the Health Council of Southeast Florida to conduct the 2014 Assessment. The Assessment includes secondary data from national, state and local databases and when appropriate and possible, comparative information is presented. Additionally, the Assessment also includes primary data from focus groups and key informant interviews. This results in a comprehensive assessment of both quantitative and qualitative data that will serve well to inform various community stakeholders The Assessment includes information and data in the following areas: 1. Demographics and Socioeconomics 2. Health and Behavior 3. Education 4. Child Welfare Demographic and Socioeconomic Profile This section provides information on a number of key demographic, social and economic indicators such as population, population growth, race and ethnicity and poverty. Key findings include: • In 2013, there were 141,994 individuals living in Indian River County, representing .73% of the state's population. • In 2013, there were 28,574 individuals 0-19 years of age in Indian River; 20.1% of the county's population; • The youth population 0-18 in Indian River's increased by 18.9%from 2000—2013; • In 2012, 78.2% of the child population from 0 to 18 years of age were white, 16.5%were black and 21.1 % were Hispanic; • In 2013, 18.9% of families in Indian River with children under 18 were living in poverty; of these, 38.9% had female head of household with no husband present. • In 2013, 21.3% of children under 18 years were living below the poverty level 81PagQ — Iridian � i _. � <� „ i; i: v CihiId n A S s -- ss rrr _ 7_ i Health and Behavior Profile This section provides information on health insurance, maternal child health, morbidity, immunizations mental health and substance abuse and other indicators including juvenile delinquency and bullying. • In 2012, 12.4% of youth 0-18 in Indian River were uninsured; • In 2013, 6.4% of children under 19 years in Indian River were enrolled in the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP); • In 2013, there were 1,217 live resident births in Indian River; • In 2013, 15.9% of the live births were to mothers with less than a high school education; • In 2013, 28.2 per 1,000 women were to teens 15— 19 years of age; • Indian River had an infant mortality rate of 6.6 per 1,000 live births in 2013; • In 2012, 24.1% of low income persons in Indian River had access to dental care; • In 2012, 11.2% of middle school students and 14.2% of high school students in Indian River were obese; • In 2014 8.6% of high school students reported smoking cigarettes in the past 30 days; • In 2014, 7.9% of middle school students and 31.8% of high school students reported using alcohol in the past 30 days; • In 2014, 5.4% of middle school students and 19.8% of high school students reported using marijuana / hashish in the past 30 days. Education This section provides information on school attendance, absenteeism, graduation rates, dropout rates, FCAT scores, scholarships and extracurricular activities. • There are 28,420 children enrolled in school in Indian River; • In 2014, 56% of 3rd graders scored 3 and above of FCAT reading and 49% scored 3 and above on FCAT math modules in Indian River County; • In 2014, 58% of 8" graders scored 3 and above on FCAT reading and 18% scored 3 and above on FCAT math modules in Indian River County; • In 2013-14 school year, the high school graduation rate in Indian River was 79.1%; • In the 2013-14 school year, 56.62% of students in Indian River were eligible for free/reduced- price lunch. Child Welfare This section provides information on child abuse, foster care, marriage dissolutions with minor children and domestic violence. • In 2012, 10.4 per 1,000 children ages 5-11 experienced child abuse; • In 2012, 14.7 per 1,000 infants in Indian River were in foster care; • In 2012, 498.3 per 100,000 children ages 5-11 and 319.2 per 100,000 children ages 12-17 were in foster care; • In 2012, there were 219 marriage dissolutions, with minor children, in Indian River. 9 � 128. 1 I Methodology At the request of the Indian River County Children's Advisory Committee, the Health Council of Southeast Florida, (HCSEF) gathered and compiled county and state-level data for the Children's Assessment. The Assessment includes both quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data are from secondary sources and include (list not exhaustive): • U.S. Census Bureau • Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) • Florida Department of Health (DOH) • Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) • Florida's Bureau of Vital Statistics • Florida Department of Juvenile Justice • Florida Department of Education Information and Accountability Services (EIAS) The qualitative data are a result of primary data collection efforts through focus groups and key informant interviews. Data was collected, analyzed, and compiled for this Assessment to enable and guide funders, service providers, educators, planners, and community leaders in identifying indicators within the community that are areas of concern, gaps in services, and opportunities for improvement related to the well-being of children in the community. E IntrodUCtiOtl The Indian River County Children's Assessment was developed at the request of the Indian River County Health Department to provide insight and to help assess the health and wellbeing of children in the county and to provide a guide for planning efforts. The data that comprise this report consist of demographic, socioeconomic, education, health, behavioral and child welfare data. For the purposes of this report, the population of those aged 0-18 were considered as the child population, however for certain data, the ages shown may vary and this is reflected in the narrative. Demographic & Socioeconomic Profile Indian River County is located in the Treasure Coast region of eastern Florida. Established in 1925, it is named for the Indian River Lagoon, which runs through the eastern part of the county. Indian River County's total area is 616.92 square miles, of which 81.57% (503.23 square miles) is land and 18.43% (113.69 square miles) is water. It is bordered by Brevard County on the north, St. Lucie County on the south, Okeechobee County on the southwest and Osceola County on the west and the Atlantic Ocean on the east.' In 2010, the density of the county was 274.5 persons per square mile.2 The demographic and socioeconomic -. . l characteristics of the residents of Indian River ^ County, specifically children, are highlighted in this section. These characteristics are important as they provide context for the health care needs of a community and are strong indicators for health care utilization patterns and health care outcomes. Finally, knowledge about the demographic and socioeconomic profile of a 3 i community provides information important to identify specific barriers to accessing health care services. Data in this needs assessment are presented for . ;. Indian River County and in some cases, the state Source:www.eflorida.com of Florida. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_River_County,_Florida 2 quickfacts.census.gov/gfd/states/12/12061.html 11 � 1C:1 � Table 1 shows the total population in Indian River County and Florida in 2013 (estimates). Indian River County's population of 141,994 accounted for just below three-quarters of a percent of Florida's population. Table 1:Total Population,Indian River and Florida,2013 Indian River Florida Population %of Florida's Population' Population 141,994 0.73% 19,552,860 Source:US Census Bureau,American Community Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 F)optlkltioll (ii"ovith Table 2 shows population growth in Indian River and Florida from 2000 to 2013. The population growth in Indian River County during this time period was 25.7% and the change in the State was 22.3%. Table 2:Population Growth,Indian River County, Florida,2000 to 2013 Population 2000 Population 2013(estimates) Percent Change` Florida 15,982,378 19,552,860 22.3% Indian River 112,947 141,994 25.7% Source:US Census Bureau,2000 and American Community Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 12 1 P r (7 i, n it y (, "1 ! C} r ns S L S s ril l C ) O -' 1 �• �� Table 3 shows the child population in 2013 by age and sex. There were 28,574 individuals 0-19 years of age in Indian River who accounted for 20.1% of the county's population. In comparison to the state, Indian River has a smaller percentage of child residents. Just over half of these (51.5%) are male. Table 3:Child Population by Age and Sex Indian River County,2013 Florida Indian River Percent Count Percent Percent Percent Mate Female Total population 100.0% 141,994 100.0% 68,164 73,830 Total child population 23.0% 28,574 20.1% 51.5% 48.5% Under 5 years 5.5% 6,368 4.5% 4.7% 4.3% 5 to 9 years 5.7% 6,990 4.9% 5.2% 4.7% 10 to 14 years 5.8% 7,287 5.1% 5.5% 4.8% 15 to 19 years 6.0% 7,929 5.6% 6.3% 4.9% Source:US Census Bureau,Population Division,Released June 2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Race/Ethnicity Table 4 shows race and ethnicity for the 2012 child population from 0 to 18 years of age. In comparison to Florida, a higher percentage of the child population in Indian River County was white (78.2% vs. 70.8%) and a lower percentage of the population was black (16.5% vs. 22.2%). 21.1% of the Indian River child population was Hispanic, compared to 28.6% in Florida. Table 4:Child Population by Race and Ethnicity,Indian River and Florida, 2012 Indian River Florida tal Female Male Total °!A Total.: Fernald .Mese Total %%T4 -Child pop. Child pop. White 10,380 10,860 21,240 78.2% 1,474,112 1,546,895 3,021,007 70.8% Black 2,117 2,355 4,472 16.5% 465,780 480,088 945,868 22.2% Other 767 697 1,464 5.4% 147,993 150,435 298,428 7.0% Hispanic 2,814 2,927 5,741 21.1% 594,337 626,907 1,221,284 28.6% Non-Hispanic 10,450 10,985 21,435 58.6% 1,493,508 1,550,512 3,044,020 71.4% Source:Department of Health,Office of Health Statistics and Assessment in consultation with the Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR),2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 13 128.15 Table 5 shows that Indian River's child population, 0 to 18 years of age, increased more than the state's population for the same age group between 2000 and 2013. Florida's child population increased by 11% between 2000 and 2013 and Indian River's increased by 18.9%. Table 5:Child Population Growth,Ages 0-18,Indian River County and Florida,2000 and 2013 Population 2000 Population 2013 Percent Growth Florida 4,048,632 4,495,006 11.0% Indian River 24,031 28,574 18.9% Source:US Census Bureau,Population Division,Released June 2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 poc )tll,ttjoll by flotisollold Table 6 shows households by household type in Indian River and in Florida in 2013. In 2013, there were 57,435 households in Indian River, of which, 21.6% were households with one or more children under 18 years of age. Just over 10,000 (19.7%)were family households with children under 18 and 12.6% were married-couple households with children under 18. Table 6:Households by Household Type,Indian River and Florida,2013 Florida Indian River Percent Count Percent Total households 57,435 Family households(families)with own children under 18 years 24.3% 11,297 19.7% Married-couple family with own children under 18 years 15.4% 7,257 12.6% Male householder,no wife present,family with own children under 18 years 2.0% 1,152 2.0% Female householder,no husband present,family with own children under 18 years 6.9% 2,888 5.0% Nonfamily households 35.8% 20,171 35.1% Households with one or more people under 18 years 27.70%lo 12,427 21.6% Average household size (X) 2.44 (X) Average family size (X) 3.00 (X) Source:US Census Bureau,American Community Survey,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 14 a — ' nuian ive ; c_ . _: r : ;i ' s ,, sS . sr; rr ' 1rJi .? .,i1i1':1 'li ,�i1 � �' --14t1i11{, i_.'t ,•'1 , °i')�/+,lt,. Children and families living in poverty is defined as those families with children whose income is below the federal poverty level. The federal poverty can change from year to year, and are calculated based on family size and composition. Table 7 below shows the 2013 poverty thresholds. So, a family consisting of two adults and two children was considered to be living in poverty if their annual income was below$23,624. Table 7:Poverty Thresholds for 2013 by Size of Family and Number of Related Children Under 18 Years,Indian River Related children under 18 years Size of family unit Weighted Eight average bone, One Two Three four Five Six Seven';` or 'thresholds more One person(unrelated 11,888 individual Under 65 years 12,119 12,119 65 years and over 11,173 11,173 Two people 15,142 Householder under 65 years 15,679 15,600 16,057 Householder 65 years and 14,095 14,081 15,996 over Three people 18,552 18,222 18,751 18,769 Four people 23,834 24,028 24,421 23,624 23,707 Five people 28,265 28,977 29,398 28,498 27,801 27,376 SIX people 31,925 33,329 33,461 32,771 32,110 31,128 30,545 Seven people 36,384 38,349 38,588 37,763 37,187 36,115 34,865 33,493 Eight people 40,484 42,890 43,269 42,490 41,807 40,839 39,610 38,331 38,006 Nine people or more 48,065 51,594 51,844 51,154 50,575 49,625 48,317 47,134 46,842 45,037 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2014 Compiled:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 15 Table 8 shows families with related children less than 18 years of age living in poverty in 2013. The highest percentage of families with children living in poverty was in families with a female head of household and no husband present. In Indian River, 38.9% of families in this category had income below the poverty level in the past 12 months. Table 8:Families With Children Whose Income in the Past 12 Months is Below the Poverty Level,Indian River and Florida,2013 Indian River Fldrida Families with related children under 18 years All families 18.9% 20.3% Married-couple families 10.0% 10.4% Families with female householder,no husband present 38.9% 38.7% Source:U.S.Census,American Community Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 9 shows children under 18 years living below the poverty level in Indian River and Florida in 2013. The percentage for Indian River, 21.3% is lower than Florida's, 24.5%. Table 9:Children Living Below the Poverty Level,Indian River and Florida,2013 Indian River EEEE��FloridaChildren under 18 years Living Below the Poverty Level 21.3%0 Source:U.S.Census,American Community Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 161Pn d i a r., Ri / er County C 'n � lclr �. n ' s Assessrn � n'C 2 G I `�Q''�� _ , :1113,"t c, Table 10 shows the earning for the population 16 years of age and older in Indian River and Florida in 2013. Florida had median earning dollars of$26,873, which exceeded Indian River's median earning dollars by$3,297. Just over a third of the population 16 years and over had earnings greater than $50,000 in both Indian River County and Florida in this category. Table 10:Earning in the Past 12 Months in Indian River,2013 Florida Indian River Population 16 years and over with earnings 9,432,527 62,672 Median earnings(dollars) $26,873 $23,576 Full-time,year-round workers with earnings 5,941,840 35,775 $1 to$9,999 or loss 2.1% 3.0% $10,000 to$14,999 5.3% 7.0% $15,000 to$24,999 18.5% 18.8% $25,000 to$34,999 19.5% 19.0% $35,000 to$49,999 20.7% 18.3% $50,000 to$64,999 12.8% 13.1% $65,000 to$74,999 5.0% 4.4% $75,000 to$99,999 7.1% 8.1% $100,000 or more 9.0% 8.3% Mean earnings(dollars) $51,266 $48,792 Note:Earnings consist of money wages or salary income and are the total income people receive for work performed as an employee during the income year.This category includes wages,salary,armed forces pay,commissions,tips,piece-rate payments,and cash bonuses earned,before deductions are made for items such as taxes,bonds, pensions,and union dues. Source:US Census Bureau,American Community Survey,1-year Estimates,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 17 f26.t `� Table 11 shows the number and percentage of families by income bracket in Indian River and Florida in 2013. The median family income in Indian River was $51,490 and the mean (average)family income was $78,788. Table 11:Family Income, Indian River and Florida,2013 Florida Indian River ��CounPercent Count Percent INCOME AND BENEFITS(IN 2013 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS) Families 4,626,388 100% 37,264 100% Less than$10,000 246,127 5.3% 1,352 3.6% $10,000 to$14,999 167,967 3.6% 813 2.2% $15,000 to$24,999 435,804 9.4% 4,194 11.3% $25,000 to$34,999 502,220 10.9% 5,071 13.6% $35,000 to$49,999 703,490 15.2% 6,655 17.9% $50,000 to$74,999 824,118 20.0% 6,699 18.0% $75,000 to$99,999 596,477 12.9% 4,276 11.5% $100,000 to$149,999 601,788 13.0% 4,772 12.8% $150,000 to$199,999 211,421 4.6% 699 1.9% $200,000 or more 236,976 5.1% 2,733 7.3% Median family income(dollars) $55,774 (X) $51,490 (X) Mean family income(dollars) $76,713 (X) $78,788 (X) Note:Family income consist of earnings and wages and may include other sources of income,such as Social Security payments,pensions,child support,public assistance,annuities,money derived from rental properties,interest and dividends. Source:US Census Bureau,American Community Survey,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 18 1 ;P -' n d i a nt l i a i C o t.i tl s c' > m e n ' 2 0 1 4 Cost of Living Table 12 shows the index values for categories of expenses comparing the Vero Beach - Indian River area to the national average. The index values allow for comparison of costs of goods and services within categories. The index value of groceries, utilities and health in the Vero Beach - Indian River area were above the national average. Housing costs are considerably less than the national average. Table 12:Cost of Living Index Values, Indian River area and National,2014 Category(Percent Weight) FL Vero Beach-Indian River National Average Composite(100%) 100.3 100 Grocery(13.56%) 107.1 100 Housing(27.02%) 88.3 100 Utilities(10.30%) 119.0 100 Transportation(12.35%) 97.8 100 Health(4.60%) 96.9 100 Miscellaneous(32.17%) 102.9 100 Source:http://www.coli.org;Cost of Living Index Calculator;subscribed to by Indian River Chamber of Commerce,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 Table 13 shows the average prices of consumer goods and services, from the ACCRA cost of living survey, in the Vero Beach, Indian River area compared to the national average. The Council for Community and Economic Research (C2ER) produces the ACCRA Cost of Living Index report to provide a useful and reasonably accurate measure of living cost differences among areas. The Indian River County Chamber of Commerce has participated in ACCRA since 1996. Table 13:Average Prices on Household Goods and Services,Indian River area and National, 2014 Item FL Vero Beach-Indian River National Average Food and Grocery Costs T-Bone Steak $10.51 $10.36 Ground Beef $3.60 $3.70 Sausage $4.57 $4.15 Frying Chicken $1.38 $1.35 Chunk Light Tuna $1.09 $1.07 Whole Milk $2.81 $2.38 Eggs $2.11 $1.94 Margarine $1.01 $1.08 Parmesan Cheese $3.85 $3.99 Potatoes $3.88 $3.15 Bananas $0.69 $0.59 Lettuce $1.80 $1.41 White bread $1.78 $1.52 Fresh Orange Juice $3.55 $3.47 Coffee $3.56 $4.26 19 o.21 Sugar Corn Flakes $2.22 $2.38 Sweet Peas $3.76 $3.52 Peaches $1.45 $1.16 Shortening $2.43 $2.43 Frozen Meal $3.53 $3.27 Frozen Corn $2.77 $2.60 Potato Chips $1.61 $1.40 Soft Drink $4.00 $3.60 Hamburger $1.85 $1.59 Pizza $3.78 $3.81 Fried Chicken $8.13 $9.12 Housing and Utility Costs $3.99 $3.74 Apartment Rent $723 Home Price $916 Total Energy $274,938 $303,409 Phone $209.40 $167.84 Transportation-related Costs $30.88 $27.92 Tire Balance Gasoline $10.72 $11.68 Healthcare-related Costs $3.48 $3.48 Optometrist Visit $112.50 $97.27 Doctor Visit $76.32 $102.46 Dentist Visit Clothing and Related Costs $92.67 $87.29 Detergent $5.19 Dry Cleaning $5.29 Man Dress Shirt $14.43 $11.45 Boy Jeans $25.66 $26.46 $24.16 $21.37 Women Slacks Miscellaneous Costs $29.94 $28.31 Washer Repair $72.50 $68.22 Haircut $14.42 $18.64 Beauty Salon $43.21 $34.21 Newspaper Movie $26.41 $18.64 Bowling $9.13 $9.66 Tennis Balls $4.50 $4.36.49 $2.48 Veterinary Services $$2$2.01 Source: http://www.coli.org;Cost of Living Index Calculator;subscribed to by Indian River Chamber of Commerce $47.44 Data Notes:Index and average prices are based on data gathered between Second Quarter 2013 and First Quarter 2014. Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 20 1 h ar - if'i cil! iv e ( s� liYlI.' Chilrir ,an S J l5 se ssmer, .. Ol F Figures 1 and 2 show the monthly averages in the number of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits and clients in Indian River and Florida for years 2009-2012. In Indian River from 2009 to 2012, the monthly average amount of TANF benefits decreased 16.7% and TANF clients decreased 23.2%. In Florida, during the same time period, TANF benefits decreased 7.3% and TANF clients decreased 8.8%. While TANF benefits and clients continuously decreased between 2009 and 2012 in Indian River, Florida experienced a slight increase in both in 2010, before decreasing again. Figure 1:Monthly Averages for Years 2009-2012,TANF Benefits and Clients, Indian River County Monthly Averages for Years 2009-2012,TANF Benefits and Clients,Indian River County $95,000 767 781 850 750 $90,000 1 640 589 650 N $85,000 }. 550 TANF Benefits CO $80,000 - 450 � LL 350 a Fa $75,000 TANF 250 Clients $70,000 150 $65,000 50 $60,000 -50 Monthly Average 2009 Monthly Average 2010 Monthly Average 2011 Monthly Average 2012 21 Figure 2:Monthly Averages for Years 2009-2012,TANF Benefits and Clients,Florida Monthly Averages for Years 2009-2012,TANF Benefits and Clients,Florida 105,510 $13,800,000 -- --- -- 106,000 $13,600,000 ____103,024 _ _ _. 104,000 $13,400,000 102,000 Y $13,200,000 ------- ___ __ ______ - 100,000N t TANF -- 98,000 Benefits $13,000,000 m ---- ----- _.. .----_ _____---------- 96,000 � LL LL $12,800,000 —$1 9- $1 2--_ 93 913 93,972 Q TANF —', 94,000 Clients $12,600,000 92,000 $12,400,000 90,000 $12,200,000 _--$1 8 $1 3 _-._ __ 88,000 $12,000,000 86,000 Monthly Average 2009 Monthly Average 2010 Monthly Average 2011 Monthly Average 2012 HofTielessness Table 14 shows the number of homeless individuals in Indian River and Florida in 2009–2013. There was nearly a 17% increase in the number of homeless individuals in Indian River between 2009 and 2013. Please see the glossary at the end of this report for the definition of homelessness used by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Table 14:Homeless People in Indian River and Florida,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Florida 57,687 57,643 56,771 54,972 43,455 Indian River 662 648 606 774 837 Source:Department of Children and Families,Council on Homelessness 2014 Report Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 22 ? ntiian AS33 s � rnnni Table 15 shows the number of homeless students in Indian River and Florida from school year 2008-09 through school year 2012-13. While the number of homeless students in Florida has been on the rise since the 2008-09 school year the numbers have decreased in Indian River over the past 2 school years. Due to federal law, public schools in Florida use an expanded definition of homelessness in order to include children and youth who do not have a regular nighttime residence. Please see the glossary for the definition of homelessness used by the public schools system in Florida. Table 15:Homeless Students in Indian River and Florida,2008-09—2012-13 2008.09 2009.10 2010.11 2011.122012.2013 Florida 41,286 49,112 56,680 63,685 70,215 Indian River 349 347 311 273 278 Source:Department of Children and Families,Council on Homelessness,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Homeless YOUth Table 16 shows homeless youth by age as of January 2014 in Indian River County. The number of homeless youth was little variation among the age groups categorized in the table below. However, the largest number exists among those 0-5 years of age at that time. Table 16:Homeless Youth by Age in Indian River,January 2014 Age Number 0-5 117 6-12 99 13-17 101 TOTAL 317 Source:The Treasure Coast Homeless Services Council,Inc.,annual point in time homeless count Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 23 ilpb - 2,5 Figure 3 and Table 17 displays the percentage and number of homeless youths by race as of January 2014 in Indian River. A total of 317 homeless youths resided in the county at the time indicated in the (table and figure below). Data suggest that 50% of homeless youth in the county were white and 43% were Black. Table 17:Homeless Youth by Race in Indian River,January 2014 Number White 158 Black 136 Asian 2 Multi-racial 21 TOTAL 317 Source:The Treasure Coast Homeless Services Council,Inc.,annual point in time homeless count Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Figure 3:Homeless Youth by race in Indian River,January 2014 f 2,1% i ■White z Black Asian z Multi-racial Source:The Treasure Coast Homeless Services Council,Inc.,annual point in time homeless count Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 24nclian , _ 201 - IP_'%.2,� Health and Behavior Profile r eI llth 111's"1r1311ce Uje: 7ti�.itt�:1 Table 16 shows Small Area Health Insurance Estimates in 2012, for people under 19 years of age in Indian River County and Florida, including rates of insured and uninsured persons. In 2012, 12.4% of individuals in Indian River were uninsured, a higher rate than in Florida as a whole (11.4%). Table 18:Health Insurance Estimates Individuals Under 19 Years of Age,Indian River,Florida,2012 Uninsured Insured '..Number'. P nt 'li c Al 0' 'Namber Peirceni of'Total tl tnil:4 p 10 Group Florida 475,048 11.4% 3,680,251 88.6% Indian River 3,294 12.4% 23,256 87.6% Source:SAHIE/State and County by Demographic and Income Characteristics,2012 Compiled by: Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Figure 4 shows health insurance coverage for individuals in Indian River under 19 years of age in 2012. Figure 4:Health Insurance Coverage,Individuals Under 19 Years of Age, 2012 Health Insurance Coverage,Individuals Under 19 Years of Age, Indian River County,2012 12% Uninsured a Insured Source:SAHIE/State and County by Demographic and Income Characteristics,2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 25 jag-27 Florida KidCare is the state's Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) offered by the state of Florida for individuals up to 19 years of age, regardless of parental employment status. Tables 19 and 20 show 2010-2013 enrollment numbers for Title XXI-Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Title XIX-Medicaid. The CHIP enrollment increased in both Indian River and Florida, between 2010 and 2012, but decreased in both in 2013. In 2013, 6.4% of children under 19 years in Indian River were enrolled in CHIP, a higher rate than Florida (5.7%). Table 19:Title XXI-Children's Health Insurance Program(CHIP),Indian River,Florida,2010,2011,2012,2013 2010 2011 2012 2013" Count Percent 'Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Florida 255,169 6.0% 251,450 5.9% 256,551 6.0% 246,273 5.7% Indian River 1,681 6.2% 1,729 6.4% 1,830 6.7% 1,726 6.4% Source:Florida Department of Health from the Agency for Health Care Administration's Florida KidCare Monthly Enrollment Reports,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 20 shows an increase in Title XIX Medicaid enrollment in both Indian River and the state between 2010 and 2013, with an increase of 14.7% in Indian River and an increase of 10.4% in Florida. Table 20:Title XIX—Medicaid,Indian River,Florida,2010-2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Florida 1,633,622 1,704,876 1,780,749 1,804,351 Indian River 9,886 10,618 11,228 11,340 Source:Florida Department of Health from the Agency for Health care Administration's Florida KidCare Monthly Enrollment Reports,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2013 Table 21 shows the number and percentage of children less than 5 years of age covered by KidCare in Indian River and Florida from 2010 to 2012. The number of children less than 5 years old covered by KidCare was consistently higher in Florida than Indian River during the three years reviewed in the table below. Table 21:Children<5 covered by KidCare(MediKids Medicaid)Indian River and Florida,2010-2012 Year Indian River Florida Count Rate(%) Count Rate(%) 2010 161 2.5% 33,495 3.2% 2011 187 2.9% 35,019 3.3% 2012 173 2.6% 34,045 3,2% Source:Florida CHARTS,2014 Complied by Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 26I .. ? — i"1CiI i7 i{ iv r C a u 1 I :ire C1 S—s SSrn -- n t 201 =t it-10 ='�1,3t �fi-t•t;3' ty_.i t;ililri i-lt ;iti; it•Ir{;= 3t,?fi•:; ot,il Bitths Table 22 shows the number of resident live births in Indian River County and Florida for 2013. The rate per 1,000 individuals was considerably lower in Indian River(8.6 per 1,000)than in Florida (11.2 per 1,000). Table 22: Total Resident Live Births,Indian River and Florida,2013 Counts and Rates Indian River Honda Births Rate peg`1 0T iafi l'00. - Rn Rate per 1 ti00 Total Pop. ' 1,217 8.6 215,194 11.2 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Births by Mother's Education Table 23 shows the number and percentage of births to mothers with less than a high school education in Florida and Indian River County in 2011, 2012, and 2013. The percentage of births to mothers who had less than a high school education decreased in both Indian River and Florida, between 2011 and 2013; however, the percentage in Indian River (15.9%) still remains higher than the state's (14.3%). Table 23:Births to Mothers with Less than High School Education,Indian River,Florida,2011,2012,2013 Number of Births Number of Total Births Percent of total Births 2011' 1 2012 t 2013 . 2011 2012 2070 2011 2012 2013 Florida 34,088 32,409 30,766 213,237 212,954 215,194 16.0% 15.2% 14.3% Indian River 254 227 193 1,277 1,247 1,217 19.9% 18.2% 15.9% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 27 Table 24 shows the number and percentage of births to mothers by race and ethnicity in Indian River County in 2013. The total number of births that year was 1,217, of which 60.8% were born to White women. Just over 20% of the births were to Hispanic women. Table 24:Births by Race and Ethnicity of Mother in Indian River,2013 Indian River Counts Percentage of Total White 740 60.8% Race Black&Other 263 21.6% Unknown Race 214 17.6% Ethnicity Hispanic 251 20.6% Non-Hispanic 966 79.4% Source:Florida CHARTS,2014 Complied by Health Council of southeast Florida,2015 Table 25 shows the number and percentage of births to unwed mothers in Indian River County and Florida over a ten year period from 2003 to 2013. During this period, there have been fluctuations, but is notable that as compared to the year before, there was a 4.6% decrease in 2013 in Indian River County, with 570 births to unwed mothers. Table 25:Births to Unwed Mothers,Indian River and Florida,2003-2013 Births to Unwed Mothers,Single Year Rates Indian River Florida Year Count Rate'(%) Count Rate(%) 2003 475 39.2% 84,733 39.9% 2004 533 43.2% 89,976 41.3% 2005 561 41.3% 96,895 42.8% 2006 649 46.0% 105,770 44.6% 2007 642 45.1% 110,160 46.1% 2008 665 48.4% 108,484 46.9% 2009 605 47.3% 105,654 47.7% 2010 613 47.0% 101,810 47.5% 2011 612 47.9% 101,466 47.6% 2012 641 51.4% 102,135 48.0% 2013 570 46.8% 103,303 48.0% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health 2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 28 1 P a g ? - i f i C 1 d ;"} r I ''l t" 0 U rl t I t_ 7 1 i Ci r P. 18' • 36 Table 26 shows the number of births and the birth rate per 1,000 individuals to mothers ages 10-14 in Florida and Indian River County from 2010 through 2013. Due to the small number of births in this age group in Indian River County, even small changes in the number of occurrences will influence the rate considerably. Table 26:Births to Mothers Ages 10-14,Florida,Indian River,2010,2011,2012,2013 Number ofi Births o Mothers 10.14 Rate Per 1,000 Female PoWation 2010 2011 2012 2013' 2010 20111 20'12 2013 Florida 250 194 192 164 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 Indian River 3 1 2 1 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.3 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Figure 5 shows counts and rates per 1,000 births to mothers 10-14 in Indian River and Florida River from 2001-2013. The bar graph illustrates the number of births in Indian River and corresponds to the numbers on the left, vertical axis. The rates for Indian River and Florida are shown as line graphs and correspond to the right, vertical axis. The number of births to mothers in this age group in Indian River has fluctuated over the time period shown. Even small changes in the number of occurrences will influence rates considerably. Figure 5 Births to Mothers Ages 10-14,Rates and Counts,Indian River and Florida,2001-2013 Births to Mothers 10-14 Rates and Counts 9 2.5 00 0 8 2 U V 7 r Q 0 6 0 d 5 1.5 4 1 d O 0 W3 O ,n O L r 2 0.5 Co n 1 0 0 � � 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 z Co Number Indian River Florida Indian River Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 29 Table 27 shows the number of births and the birth rate per 1,000 to mothers ages 15-19 in Florida and Indian River County in 2010 through 2013. The number of births to teenage mothers (ages 15-19) in Indian River has been on a downward trend, decreasing from 116 in 2010 to 101 in 2013, and demonstrating nearly a 13% decrease in the number of teenage births. Although the rate in Indian River decreased, in 2013 it was still higher, 28.2 per 1,000 females, than the rate in Florida, 23.8 per 1,000 females. Table 27:Births to Mothers Ages 15-19,Florida,Indian River,2010,2011,2012,2013 Number of Births to Mothers 15-19 Mate Per 1,000 Female Population 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010` 2011 2012 2013 Florida 19,142 17,126 15,950 13,956 32.4 29.1 27.2 23.8 Indian River 116 119 120 101 32.1 33.0 33.4 28.2 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Figure 6 shows counts and rates per 1,000 births to mothers 15-19 in Indian River and Florida from 2001-2013. The bar graph illustrates the number of births in Indian River and corresponds to the numbers on the left, vertical axis. The rates are shown as line graphs and correspond to the right, vertical axis. The rates in Indian River and Florida have followed a similar downward trend, though Floridas's rate has been consistently lower. Figure 6:Births to Mothers Ages 15-19,Counts and Rates,Indian River and Florida,2001-2013 Births to Mothers 15-19 Rates and Counts T L 180 ._--.-------------- --------------------------- -------------� 60 0 L 160 Y- c �a 140 — 50 rn 120 40 Cn LO 100 - -- -- — ___ _— _ _ _— _-_ __ ___ E Cn 30 Lj_ 800 1 2 L 60 20 Cn Q 40 J- 1 w 10 20 CO z 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number Indian River Florida —Indian River j Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 30 1 P a ye — n i -? n Rive lr Cr) u l ): y C h i I lre n ' s A s s e s S rn en t 2 'J 14 i; . ld - Table 28 shows the prenatal care status of births in Indian River and Florida for the years 2011, 2012, and 2013. Using the Kotelchuck Index to determine adequate care, the percentage of births in Indian River when the mother had adequate prenatal care (calculated using only births with known prenatal care status)was 74.1% in 2013, a decrease from 78.6% in 2011. Indian River had a greater percentage of births to mothers receiving adequate prenatal care as compared to the state of Florida, for the year 2013. Table 28:Prenatal Care,Indian River,Florida,2011,2012,2013 Indian River Florida ZIt11 2012 2013 20912012 2013 2019 2012 2013 Count Percentage of births Percentage of birdii Births to Mothers With 3rd Trimester or No 50 74 92 4.2% 6.3% 7.8% 4.4% 4.8% 4.9% Prenatal Care Births with adequate prenatal care(Kotelchuck 941 930 902 78.6% 78.9% 74.1% 70.3% 70.6% index) Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2013 Notes:Percentage of births with adequate prenatal care is calculated by using the number of births with known PNC status as the denominator. 'Adequate care is determined by the Kotelchuck Index(Indicates that prenatal care began by at least the 41h month and at least 80%of recommended prenatal visits were received. Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 31 � l�0.33 Table 29 shows the number of births by the trimester in which prenatal care was initiated by zip code in Indian River in 2013. There was a total of 1,217 births in Indian River in 2013. With relatively low numbers of births in some areas, even a few occurrences will significantly influence the percentages. Table 29:Births by Trimester Prenatal Care Started by Zip Code in Indian River,2013 1st trimester 2nd trimester 3rd trimesterNo prenatal care Unknown status Total ;, .. . „ , # Percent # . 'Percentage #" Percentage # Percentage # Percentage 32948 Fellsmere 56 64.4% 17 19.5% 12 13.8% 1 1.1% 1 1.1% 87 32957 Roseland 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 32958 Sebastian 121 74.2% 29 17.8% 9 5.5% 0 0.0% 4 2.5% 163 32960 Vero Beach 135 66.8% 46 22.8% 16 7.9% 3 1.5% 2 1.0% 202 32962 Vero Beach 181 71.5% 44 17.4% 13 5.1% 0 0.0% 15 5.9% 253 32963 Vero Beach 21 80.8% 3 11.5% 1 3.8% 0 0.0% 1 3.8% 26 32966 Vero Beach 68 67.3% 21 20.8% 7 6.9% 1 1.0% 4 4.0% 101 32967 Vero Beach 170 66.4% 53 20.7% 12 4.7% 4 1.6% 17 6.6% 256 32968 Vero Beach 95 80.5% 12 10.2% 9 7.6% 1 0.8% 1 0.8% 118 32970 Wabasso 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 32976 Sebastian 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 99999 Unknown 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 Total 854 226 82 10 45 1,217 source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health.Bureau of vital Statistic,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 30 shows the number of births by race by the trimester in which prenatal care began in Indian River in 2013. The majority of women are accessing prenatal care in the first trimester. White women had the highest rate at 74% of accessing care in the first trimester. Table 30:Births by Race by Trimester Prenatal Care began in Indian River,2013 White Black&Other Unknown Count %of White %of Black %of Total Births Count girths Count Unknown 1st trimester 548 74% 167 63Births % 139 65% 854 2nd trimester 117 16% 62 24% 47 22% 226 3rd trimester 41 6% 19 7% 22 10% 82 No prenatal care 5 1% 4 2% 1 0% 10 Unknown prenatal care status 29 4% 11 �40%16 ] 5 2% 45 otal 740 263 214 1,217 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 32 1 P Il Ci i e n ' s ,4 s s e s1 n)2 n �a�-31 Table 31 shows the number of women who had less than adequate prenatal care by race, ethnicity by zip code in Indian River in 2013 using the Kotelchuck index. Table 31:Less than Adequate Prenatal Care(Kotelchuck Index)by Ethnicity by Zip Code in Indian River,2013 Non- Non- Hispanic Hispanic Total �ispa�lic Hispani ` Tafat Hispanic' Total Total or Haitian or Fiaitim 32948 1 4 5 0 3 3 15 15 23 32957 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32958 0 26 26 0 5 5 1 1 32 32960 0 34 34 1 7 8 16 16 58--- 32962 832962 0 24 24 0 17 17 5 5 46 > 32963 0 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 4 Ln 32966 2 14 16 0 4 4 4 4 24 32967 0 18 18 0 33 33 8 8 59 32968 0 11 11 0 2 2 4 4 17 32970 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 32976 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 99999 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 3 137 140 1 74 75 53 53 268 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Notes:Percentage of births with adequate prenatal care is calculated by using the number of births with known PNC status as the denominator 'Adequate care is determined by the Kotelchuck Index(Indicates that prenatal care began by at least the 40,month and at least 80%of recommended prenatal visits were received. Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Birth Weight Proper prenatal care is important during pregnancy and can reduce the risk of having a low birth weight baby. Table 32 shows the counts and percentages of live births classified as being "low birth weight," or weighing less than 2500 grams for the years 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. During this time, the rate of low birth weight births in Florida remained relatively stable, while the rate in Indian River decreased from 7.9% in 2010 to 7.0% in 2013. Table 32:Live Births under 2500 grams in Indian River and Florida,2010,2011,2012,2013 Number of LM Births Number of Total Births Rate(°lo) 2010 20111 .. 2012 1 2013 2010 "2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Florida 18,719 18,558 18,291 18,371 214,519 213,237 212,954 215,194 8.7% 8.7% 8.6% 8.5% Indian River 103 122 110 85 1,305 1,277 1,247 1,217 7.9% 9.6% 8.8% 7.0% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 33 i �9 � 35 Table 33 shows the count and percent of live births classified as "very low birth weight," or weighing less than 1500 grams. The rate in Florida declined slightly in 2013, while the rate in Indian River fluctuating a bit during the same time period. The rate in 2013 (1.2%) is lower than the state's rate in 2013 (1.5%). Due to the relatively small number of occurrences, the rate may be considerably affected by even small changes in the number of very low birth weight births. Table 33:Live Births Under 1500 Grams,Indian River,Florida,2010,2011,2012,2013 Number of VLBW Births Number of Total Births Rate'(%) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Florida 3,522 3,433 3,415 3,311 214,519 213,237 212,954 215,194 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% Indian River 15 23 16 15 1,305 1,277 1,247 1,217 1.1% 1.8% 1.3% 1.2% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 341Pae --- Inc; ia riunhildren ' s Assessrn .= n Infant mortality is the death of an infant 0-364 days old. Infant mortality in Indian River County fluctuated significantly between 2010 and 2013. The highest rate, 12.5 per 1,000 live births, was in 2011 and the lowest rate, 6.6 per 1,000 live births was in 2013. The infant mortality rate in Indian River was consistently higher than Florida during this time. Due to the relatively small number of infant deaths and infant births, small changes in the number of occurrences can greatly affect the rate. Table 34 shows the total infant mortality in Indian River and Florida. Table 34:Total Infant Mortality(0-364 days)in Indian River and Florida,2010,2011,2012,2013 IIUtlll�El° Infant Deaths. Numbet'+Cif Too Uve Blr is Rate Pef , ) 2010 20f1 2012 2013 '2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012`, 2013 Florida 1,400 1,372 1,285 1,318 214,519 213,237 212,954 215,194 6.5 6.4 6.0 6.1 Indian River 11 16 12 8 1,305 1,277 1,247 1,217 8.4 12.5 9.6 6.6 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Figure 7 shows infant mortality rates in Florida counties in 2013. Indian River, with a rate of 6.57 per 1,000 live births, is in one of the top tiers of counties with the highest infant mortality rates. Florida's rate during this same time was 6.1 per 1,000 live births. Figure 7:Infant Deaths per 1,000 Live Births,Florida by County,2013 WkEscarr�ia�R�taloos •astir _ Nass a{hv� _ hfaaist.r Ha�alwm6 a . Gut, � Ta'crLala•,•e Uni rl�. St.Johns Circe Putnam Hagler Ley Volusta uKter Lake Seminole Hernando Ott Flaica.6.' Pasco F�tvxc =` Osceola =R.63 FirellWabaouo Polk 63.2e Indian River Maratee Har.eeIkeattw) Hi;Hardsx`l`Ie Sarasota Ce Sac Martin Chartctt Lee Hendry Palrr Beath colhet Bro�.ard hAtrror Caae Data source:Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics 35 12� • 37 Table 35 shows infant death per 1,000 live births by race in Indian River County and Florida from 2009 to 2013. Infant death rate was highest among nonwhites in both in Indian River County and Florida. There was a significant increase among Black and other races in the county in 2012 and then the rate decreased significantly in 2013. The infant mortality rate in Indian River was consistently higher than Florida during the past several years. Due to the relatively small number of infant deaths and infant births, small changes in the number of occurrences will significantly affect the rate. Table 35:Infant Deaths per 1,000 Live Births by Race in Indian River and Florida,2009-2013 Indian River Florida Year White Black&Other TOTAL White,, Black& TOTAL Other Count Rate ` Count .' Rate - CountRate ` RtRaie _ Rate <�. n r 2009 4 3.9 2 8 6 4.7 4.9 12.1 6.9 2010 4 4.6 7 24.2 11 8.4 4.9 10.8 6.5 2011 8 10.3 8 28 16 12.5 4.6 11.1 6.4 E2012 3 3.9 9 33.5 12 9.6 4.6 9.7 6.0 2013 2 2.7 6 22.8 8 6.6 4.6 10 6.1 Source:FloridaCHARTS, Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida 2014 Table 36 shows fetal deaths in Indian River and Florida from 2009 to 2013. Florida consistently had higher fetal death rates than Indian River from 2009 through 2012. However, Indian River, with a rate of 8.1 per 1,000 deliveries, exceeded Florida's rate of 7.1 in 2013. Table 36:Fetal Deaths per 1,000 Live Births,Florida by County,2013 Number of Fetal Deaths Rate per 1,000 Deliveries 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 , 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Indian River 6 5 4 7 10 4.7 3.8 3.1 5.6 8.1 Florida 1,569 1,551 1,558 1,530 1,533 7 7.2 7.3 7.1 7.1 Source:FloridaCHARTS, Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 36 � raQe - Indian Rig y C ' I ger Co �,� nt � ni ; c. ra �, ' � ;`.� s - lsrnnl1i 201z'.- 18. 36 L6 IIS Table 37 shows the number and crude rate of childhood deaths, for children 0 to 17 years old, in Indian River County and Florida from 2009 through 2013. During the period shown, the rates fluctuated in Florida and Indian River. In 2013, the childhood death rate in Indian River increased to 66.3 per 100,000 individuals in the age group, up from 62.4 in 2012. Due to the relatively small number of occurrences, a small change in the number of occurrences will influence the rates. Table 37:Childhood Deaths,Indian River,Florida,2009,2010,2011, 2012,2013 Number of Childhood(4-17)Deaths Crude Dearth Rate Per 100,400 2409 ' 2010 dfil ;``: 01 241 2005 2010 2011 "1 2012 2013 Florida 2,412 2,210 2,191 2,046 2,105 57.9 55.3 54.8 50.8 51.8 Indian 11 14 18 16 17 43.0 54.6 70.3 62.4 66.3 River Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 38 shows the leading rankable causes of childhood deaths, for children 0 to 17 years old, per 100,000 individuals, in Indian River in the year 2013, compared to deaths of the same cause in Florida. The leading cause of death in Indian River was perinatal period conditions with a total number of 6 cases per 100,000 individuals. Table 38:Leading Rankable Causes of Childhood Deaths,Indian River and Florida,2013 Cause of Death Indian River Florida Deaths Deans' Unintentional Injury 6 679 Perinatal Period Conditions(P00-P96) 5 79 Anemias(D50-D64) 1 380 Congenital Malformations 1 1 Malignant Neoplasm(Cancer) 1 281 Medical&Surgical Care Complications(Y40-Y84,Y88) 1 14 Source:FloddaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Vital Statistics,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 37 �r�g "-3q Table 39 shows the sexually transmitted disease (STD) rate in Florida and Indian River County for those 15-19 from 2010 through 2013. The bacterial STDs include: Chancroid, Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Granuloma inguinale, Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)and Syphilis. Though the state's rate per 1,000 has been on a consistent downward trend during this period, the rates in Indian River County have fluctuated a bit, but have decreased over the past couple of years and have also been lower than Florida's rates during this same time. In 2013, Indian River had a rate of 19.6 per 1,000 while Florida had a rate of 21.0 per 1,000. Table 39:Bacterial STDs in Ages 1.5-19,Indian River, Florida,2010,2011,2012,2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 County Counts Rate per Counts Rate per r Counts Rate perounRate per 1,000 1, ts 000 C1,000 1,000 Florida 30,248 24.8 28,918 23.9 27,052 22.5 25,250 21.0 Indian River 191 24.1 200 25.7 159 20.8 147 19.6 Note:Includes Chancroid,Chlamydia,Gonorrhea,Granuloma inguinale,LGV,Syphilis Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of STD Prevention&Control,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 38enan pi +/ ,, i" C 0 U n Y -C ;iilfi � - - _ .. � r�� c 7 '3 Cil P n � 7 Q 1 A According to the CDC, vaccine-targeted age groups include children who are less 5 years old, adults over the age of 65, pregnant women and women 2 weeks postpartum. Table 40 shows the numbers and rates of vaccine preventable diseases for vaccine-targeted age groups in Indian River County and Florida from 2009 through 2012. Due to the relatively small number of occurrences, an even small change in the number of occurrences will influence the rate. Table 40:Vaccine Preventable Diseases Rate for Vaccine-targeted Age Groups,Indian River,Florida,2009,2010,2011,2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year Ratesper ids per, Rates peg Rates per Counts Counts Counts 100,000 'fti0 000 100,000 100,000 Florida 258 1.4 197 1.0 198 1.0 297 1.6 Indian River 0 0 0 0 1 0.7 0 0 Note:Data include Diphtheria,Hi8<5,Hepatitis 8<19,Measles<19,Mumps,Rubella,Polio,Tetanus and Pertussis<7. Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Epidemiology,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Irtuiiunizations Table 41 shows the counts and rates of children in kindergarten immunized between 2009 and 2013, in Indian River County and Florida. During this time, Indian River's rate of immunized kindergarteners ranged from the lowest (89.4%) in 2010 to the highest (95.1%) in 2012. Florida's rate ranged from the lowest (91.3%) in 2009 to the highest (93.2%) in 2013. Table 41:Immunization Levels in Kindergarteners,Indian River,Florida,2009,2010, 2011,2012,2013 2009 2010, 2011, . ;. 2012 2013 Courrt Rate('/o) iar�t a{"/o) Goun date;{°I� Count Mate(%j 'Count Rate V/61' Florida 199,638 91.3% 200,264 91.3% 208,766 92.6% 216,027 92.1% 217,945 93.2% Indian River 1,297 92.2% 1,282 89.4% 1,323 91.1% 1,333 95.1% 1,299 93.0% Source:Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Immunization,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 39 �g ` I Figure 8 shows the trends of immunization counts and rates in Indian River in 2008-2013. Figure 8:Immunization Levels,Counts and Rates,In Kindergarteners,Indian River County,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012,2013 Immunization Levels,Counts and Rates,In Kindergarten,Indian River County,2008-2013 1,340 95,4%0 95 96.0% :1'% j N 1,330 _ 95.0% N 1,320 — — - - — -93:00% 94.0% E 92.2% ` 1,310 — __ -- ❑ i- 93.0% ` I r ❑ '- 92.0% a) 1,300 — - - - CO i rn 91.0% CD 1,290 — -------. .—_ ---- —._—. _ � = 89.4% 90.0% Y 1,280 Y 0 89.0% 1,270 — - E -- — — 88.0% Z 1,260 — -- --- — — 87.0% 1,250 86.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number of Kindergarteners Immunizations ❑ Percentage of Kindergarten Immunizations Source:Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Immunization,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Enteric Disease Table 42 shows enteric disease cases and rates in children less than 6 years of age from 2010 to 2012 in Indian River and Florida. Enteric diseases include probable and confirmed cases of Campylobacteriosis, Giardiasis, Hepatitis A, Salmonellosis, and Shigellosis. The rate decreased in Indian River during 2010 and 2011, but more than doubled in 2012. Table 42:Enteric Disease Cases in Children under 6,Indian River,Florida,2010,2011,2012 2010 2011 2012 Counts Rate per 100,000 Counts Rate per 100,000 Counts Rate per 100,000 Florida 4,145 325.2 4,405 344.7 4,465 344.3 Indian River 32 408.2 29 369.4 95 1197.2 Note:Data include probable and confirmed cases of Campylobacteriosis,Giardiasis,Hepatitis A,Salmonellosis,and Shigellosis. Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Epidemiology,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 40 1P i C o u n t C h i I n ' s Ass 2 S s -r n %. �� Table 43 shows enteric disease cases in day care centers in Indian River and Florida from 2010 to 2012. The rates in both the county and the state fluctuated considerably during this time, but Indian River increased substantially to a rate of 756.1 in 2012. This rate is several times higher than the state's rate. Table 43:Enteric Disease Cases in Day Care Centers, Indian River,Florida,2010, 2011, 2012 2410 2011- 2012 Counts Rate 0 ,000 outtts P� 46006 C+�u kafie per 100,404`: Florida 1,165 91.4 1,414 110.7 1,414 109.0 Indian River 14 178.6 11 140.1 60 756.1 Note:Data include probable and confirmed cases of Campylobacteriosis,Giardiasis,Hepatitis A,Salmonellosis,and Shigellosis. Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Epidemiology,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 411 t2Q • H3 ACC..';: . Table 44 shows access to dental care by low-income persons living in Indian River County and Florida in 2010, 2011, and 2012. In 2010, it is noteworthy that 60.2% of low-income persons reported having access to dental care in Indian River, compared to 36.4% in Florida. The rates in Indian River and Florida were comparable in 2011 and 2012. Table 44:Access to Dental Care by Low Income Persons,All Ages,Indian River,Florida,2010,2011,2012 2010 20111 2012 Counts Rate(%)" Counts at �N � Counts � Rate(%) Florida 855,659 36.4% 742,484 23.4% 808,489 24.9% Indian River 7,953 60.2% 4,678 24.6% 5,397 241% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Public Health Dental Program,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 VVIG 1'.1i{;=;3 1,1tiolI WIC is a special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children (WIC)that provides supplemental foods, health care referrals, and nutrition education for low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and non-breastfeeding postpartum women, as well as infants and children up to age 5 who are at nutritional risk.3 Table 45 shows the number of individuals eligible for WIC benefits who were served in 2009 through 2012. During the time period shown, the rate of WIC eligible individuals served fluctuated in Indian River and Florida however, Florida consistently had higher rates than Indian River. In 2012, Indian River had a rate of 78.7 per 100,000 individuals, compared to 82.9 per 100,000 in Florida. Table 45:WIC Eligibles Served,Indian River, Florida,2009,2010,2011,2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 Rate per Rate per Rate per Rate per Participants 100,000 Participants 100,000 Participants 100,000 Participants 100,000 Florida 496,969 83.9 502,959 86.6 502,959 86.6 481,110 82.9 Indian 3,129 80.5 3,208 83.8 3,208 83.8 3,036 78.7 River Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,WIC&Nutrition Services'WIC Potentially Eligible Population,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 3 htti�: da._m% �ciC 421P e - d "€ an ii : r County Children ' s Ass � ssrne in Overweight and obesity have become an epidemic in the United States. Children who are overweight or obese are at risk for chronic diseases in childhood, including diabetes, high cholesterol, and high blood pressure. According to the CDC, children whose BMI is at or above the 95th percentile are considered obese.° Table 46 shows children older than 1 year of age in the WIC program who were overweight or obese in 2010-2012. Table 46:WIC children >1 Who are Overweight or Obese, Indian River and Florida,2010,2011,2012 2010 2011 2012 Florida 29.5% 28.8% 28.30% Indian River 30.9% 32.3% 27.9% Source:FloridaCHARTS,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 47 shows the percentage of obese middle school students for the years 2008, 2010, and 2012 in Indian River and Florida. During the time period shown, the rate in Indian River increased. In 2012, 11.2% of middle school students in Indian River were obese, an increase from 8.3% in 2008. Table 47:Middle School Students Who Are Obese, Indian River,Florida,2008,2010,2012 2008 2010 2012 Florida 11.3% 11.7% 11.1 Indian River 8.3% 9.5% 11.2% Source:FloddaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Epidemiology,Youth Risk Behavior Survey,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 4 hrrhcc�Ic _, ub�,it .^,r.d; „•.'.' , 'oiml 43 IZ�- q 5 Table 48 shows the percentage of obese High school students for the years 2008, 2010, and 2012 in Indian River and Florida. The rates of obese high school students in both Florida and Indian River increased in the time period shown. In 2012, the rates were similar in Florida (14.3%)and Indian River (14.2%). Table 48:High School Students Who Are Obese,Indian River,Florida,2008,2010,2012 2008 2010 2012 Florida 11.0% 11.5% 14.3% Indian River 11.4% 10.6% 14.2% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Bureau of Epidemiology,2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Tables 49 and 50 show the percentage of middle school students without sufficient vigorous physical activity in Indian River and Florida in 2008, 2010 and 2012 Sufficient vigorous physical activity is defined as participating in physical activity that makes you sweat or breathe hard for 20 minutes or more on three or more of the 7 days. In 2012, 26.9% of middle school students and 36.4%% of high school students in Indian River did not get sufficient vigorous physical activity. Table 49:Middle School Students Without Sufficient Vigorous Physical Activity,Indian River and Florida,2008,2010,2012 Indian River Florida 2008 29.0% 31.6% 2010 27.8% 30.7% 2012 26.9% 29.9% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Youth Risk Behavior Survey,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 50:High School Students Without Sufficient Vigorous Physical Activity,Indian River and Florida,2008,2010,2012 Indian River Florida 2008 38.0% 40.6% 2010 33.5% 39.1% 2012 36.4% 37.3% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Health,Youth Risk Behavior Survey,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 44 P o2 — ind Iia n I �; ? _ li1drP. n S AS5esscnl 2r) f 2 ] 1 Table 51 shows the percentage of middle school students in Indian River and Florida who reported `current cigarette use' from 2002 through 2014. Current cigarette use is defined as having smoked one or more cigarettes during the past 30 days. While the rate in Florida has been on a steady downward trend, the rate in Indian River has fluctuated, with a sharp increase between 2008 and 2009. In 2014, 3.0% of Indian River County middle school students reported smoking cigarettes in the past 30 days. Table 51:Middle School Students Who Report Smoking Cigarettes in the Past 30 Days,Indian River,Florida,2002-2014 2002 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Florida 9.2% 6.6% 5.0% 4.9% 3.3% 2.0% Indian River 7.4% 4.4% 5.2% 7.9% 3.4% 3.0% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 52 shows the percentage of high school students in Indian River and Florida who reported `current cigarette use'from 2006 through 2014. Current cigarette use is defined as having smoked one or more cigarettes during the past 30 days. In both the county and the state, the rate of middle school student smokers decreased considerably between 2006 and 2014, with a 8.4 percentage point decrease in Florida and a 9.7 percentage point decrease in Indian River. Indian River's rate of high school students who reported smoking, 8.6%, was greater than the state's, 7.1%, in 2014. Table 52:High School Students Who Report Smoking Cigarettes in the Past 30 Days,Indian River,Florida,2006-2014 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Florida 15.5% 14.5% 13.1% 10.1% 7.1% Indian River 18.3% 15.5% 14.0% 13.9% 8.6% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 45 / 2--cf- y i.V Alcohol is the most widely used and abused drug among U.S. youth, even more so than tobacco and illicit drugs. Alcohol is responsible for over 4,700 underage youth deaths every year. In 2010, emergency room visits by persons under 21 years of age accounted for about 189,000 visits due to injuries and other conditions related to alcohol.' Table 53 shows the percentage of middle students in Indian River and Florida, from 2004 —2014 who reported consuming alcohol in the past 30 days. The percentages decreased in Florida during this time, but have fluctuated considerably in Indian River. In fact, in 2010, 21.2% of the middle school students reported having used alcohol in the past 30 days in the county. From that point, there has been a considerable decrease in Indian River, with a low of 7.9% in 2014, which is considerably less than Florida's (10.1%). Table 53:Middle School Students Who Report Having Used Alcohol in the Past 30 days,Indian River,Florida,2004-2014 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Florida 20.3% 19.0% 17.3% 16.8% 12.3% 10.1% Indian River 19.3% 19.8% 17.8% 21.2% 12.8% 7.9% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 54 shows the percentage of middle school students in Indian River and Florida in 2004—2014, who reported binge drinking. Binge drinking is defined as having 5 or more drinks in a row in the past 2 weeks. The percentages in both Indian River and Florida have decreased from 2004 to 2014. Indian River's percentage, 3.3% is a bit lower than the state's 3.9%. Table 54:Middle School Students Reporting Binge Drinking,Indian River,Florida, 2004-2014 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Florida 8.5% 8.4% 6.2% 6.9% 4.7% 3.9% Indian River 7.7% 9.2% 7.6% 9.2% 3.8% 3.3% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 5 _�=. alcohol Yiict-�hcrt ;und�ra�c-clnnhin�.hnn 46 I a — i ri ci I a Ci R i n ( fD fa '. i` h I CI Y P_ l 5 1 s P s S rn e n t 2 0 )_ 4 Table 55 shows the percentage of high school students in Indian River and Florida in 2004-2014, who reported alcohol use. Similar to middle school students, the rate of high school students in Indian River and Florida who reported using alcohol in the past 30 days decreased from 2004 to 2014. In 2014, the rate in Florida (28.4%) was slightly lower than Indian River (31.8%). Indian River had a decrease of 9.2 percentage points while Florida had a decrease of 15.4 percentage points the time period shown. Table S5:High School Students Who Report Having Used Alcohol in the Past 30 days,2004-2014 2004 2006 - 2008 2010 2012 2014 Florida 42.0% 41.8% 39.5% 38.0% 33.9% 28.4% Indian River 47.2% 46.4% 48.3% 41.3% 35.7% 31.8% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 56 shows the percentage of high school students in Indian River and Florida who reported binge drinking in Indian River County and Florida from 2004 through 2014. This percentage represents the number of students reporting having 5 or more drinks in a row in the past 2 weeks. Both the county and state rates decreased in the time period shown, however, Indian River had a greater percentage point decrease, 10.2, versus 8.3 in Florida. However, in 2014 the rate in Indian River(14.9%)was still higher than in Florida (13.7%). Table 56:High School Students Reporting Binge Drinking,2004-2014 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Florida 22.0% 23.0% 21.5% 19.6% 16.4% 13.7% Indian River 25.1% 27.5% 28.7% 20.6% 16.9% 14.9% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 47 2F- Table 57 shows the percentage of middle school students who reported using marijuana/hashish in the previous 30 days. In 2014, 5.4% of middle school students in Indian River and 4.2% of students in Florida reported marijuana/hashish use in the past 30 days. While Florida's rate of use decreased from 5.2% in 2006 to 4.2% in 2014, Indian River's rate increased during this time from 5.0% in 2006 to 5.4% in 2014. Table 57:Middle School Students Who Report Using Marijuana/Hashish in the Past 30 Days,2004-2014 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Florida No data 5.2% 4.4% 5.7% 4.2% 4.2% Indian River No data 5.0% 5.4% 7.6% 5.0% 5.4% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 58 shows the percentage of high school students who reported using marijuana/hashish in the previous 30 days. In 2014, 19.8% of high school students in Indian River and 18.6% of students in Florida reported marijuana/hashish use in the past 30 days. Both the state and county rates have fluctuated over this time. Table 58:High School Students Who Report Using Marijuana/Hashish in the Past 30 Days,2004-2014 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Florida 16.4% 16.0% 16.2% 18.6% 18.5% 18.6% Indian River 13.0% 19.4% 17.4% 20.6% 19.5% 19.8% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 481Pa e - Indian RiVE� r County Chi1d . > > ssment 2014 -x - 50 Table 59 shows the percentages of Indian River and Florida students, by gender and age group, who reported using various drugs in their lifetimes. In Indian River, 55.0% of females and 43.0% of males reported using alcohol or any illicit drug. These percentages are considerably higher than Florida's. inhalants. In both the county and state, younger adolescents, ages 10-14, reported using inhalants at a higher rate than older adolescents, ages 15-17. Table 59:Students Who Reported Having Used Various drugs in Their Lifetimes,Indian River and Florida 2014 Indian River Florida Female Male Ages 4 [23.0%. Ages Tdtai Female Male ,t0 Ags , A#f Total Alcohol 49.6% 37.0% 25.2% 57.0% 43.0% 44.3% 40.9% 26.6% 56.5% 42.6% Cigarettes 19.1% 17.6% 10.8% 18.4% 17.2% 18.0% 10.1% 23.5% 17.6% Marijuana or Hashish 24.4% 23.3% 8.8% 35.8% 23.30,46 22.1% 23.0% 9.2% 34.1% 22.6% Synthetic Marijuana 8.5% 9.3% 9.1% 9.1% 7.7% 10.0% -- 8.9% 8.8% Inhalants 6.5% 4.0% 6.5% 3.7% 5.2% 7.2% 5.8% 8.3% 5.0% 6.5% Club Drugs 2.8% 3.4% 1.2% 5.2% 3.2% 2.8% 3.2% 1.2% 4.2% 3.0% LSD,PCP or Mushrooms 2.7% 5.7% 1.5% 5.9% 4.2% 2.8% 4.3% 1.4% 5.3% 3.6% Methamphetamine 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% 0.3% 0.6% 0.8% 1.2% 0.8% 1.1% 1.0% Cocaine or Crack Cocaine 1.4% 2.3% 0.9% 2.4% 1.9% 1.6% 2.1% 0.9% 2.4% 1.9% Heroin 0.7% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.8% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% Depressants 5.9% 3.1% 2.1% 6.4% 4.5% 5.1% 3.6% 2.1% 6.3% 4.3% Prescription Pain Killers 5.9% 5.2% 1.8% 8.1% 5.8% 5.9% 5.1% 3.3% 7.4% 5.5% Prescription Amphetamines 3.5% 4.9% 1.4% 5.8% 4.2% 3.5% 3.2% 1.2% 5.0% 3.3% Steroids(without a doctor's order) 0.0% 1.3% 0.2% 1.2% 0.6% 0.3% 1.0% 0.5% 0.8% 0.7% Over-the-Counter Drugs 5.0% 3.8% 1.9% 6.1% 4.5% 5.1% 4.8% 3.5% 6.2% 5.0% Any illicit drug 31.9% 26.3% 15.9% 40.0% 29.2% 30.7% 29.4% 18.7% 39.9% 30.0% Any illicit drug other than 19.2% 15.7% 11.4% 20.5% 17.5% 17.9% 16.4% 13.9% 19.9% 17.1% Alcohol only 23.7% 16.3% 15.6% 23.1% 19.7% 19.5% 17.8% 14.8% 22.0% 18.6% Alcohol or any illicit drug 55.0% 43.0% 31.2% 63.2% 48.8% 50.1% 47.0% 33.3% 61.9% 48.5% Any illicit drug, but not alcohol 6.1% 6.2% 6.3% 6.7% 6.2% 5.9% 6.3% 6.9% 5.5% 6.1% Source:Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey,2014 The symbol"-"indicates that data are not available. Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 49 � 28 - 5I Education �c�x�;,<�I E: 111't>lltlt4�ilt Table 60 shows school enrollment in 2013 in Indian River and Florida. Of the 28,420 individuals enrolled in school in Indian River, 8.16%, (2,319)were in nursery or preschool, 3.59% (1,020)were in kindergarten, 42.93% (12,201)were in elementary school and 25.46% (7,236)were in high school. Table 60:School Enrollment,Indian River and Florida,2013 Florida Indian River Population 3 years and over enrolled in school 4,643,948 28,420 28,420 Nursery school,preschool 6.2% 2,319 8.16% Kindergarten 4.9% 1,020 3.59% Elementary school(grades 1-8) 39.0% 12,201 42.93% High school(grades 9-12) 1 20.6% 7,236 25.46% College or graduate school 29.3% 5,644 19.86% Source:US Census Bureau,American Community Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Attendance Table 61 shows student school attendance by average daily attendance and the average daily membership from the 2012-2013 school year. The Average Daily Attendance (ADA) is the average number of students present each day school is in session. The Average Daily Membership (ADM) is the average number of students on the current school roll each day school is in session. For the time period shown, Florida and Indian River had similar percentages of students present, 94.3% and 94.1%, respectively. Table 61:Student Average Daily Attendance(ADA)/Average Daily Membership(ADM),2012-2013 School Year Days Present Days Absent Total Student Days Percent Present I ADA ADM Indian River 3,158,705 3,158,705 3,358,387 94.1% j 17,548 18,658 Florida 455,048,769 27,587,404 482,636,173 94.3% - Note:The symbol--means data are not available Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(EIAS),2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 50 � a ._ _ — ? ndian R j v e r Co1aniy C "Aii _ r . , _ ref_ 7_ 014 t cr � 52— Table 62 shows the number and percentage of students absent 21 or more days during the 2012-13 school year, in Indian River and Florida. In Indian River, 11.1% of students were absent 21 or more days, compared to 9.6% in Florida. Table 62:Students Absent 21+Days,2012-13 School Year Total All-Year Membership #Absent 21+Days %Absent 21+Days Indian River 21,648 2,402 11.1% Florida 3,099,832 298,043 9.6% Note:Total All-Year Membership refers to the total number of students on the current rolls of all schools in Indian River County Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information&Accountability Services,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Graduation rates Table 63 shows graduation rates by race and ethnicity from 2012 to 2013 in Indian River and Florida. Indian River achieved higher graduation rate the Florida among White, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino and Asians. Table 63:Graduation Rates by Race/Ethnicity,Indian River,Florida,2012-13 Black or American Two or Native Hawa�ran or White` AMean 41spaniclL doo Asian Indian or, MoreTotal Ametlloan Alaska I�Iative" Races Other Pacific Islander Florida 80.5% 64.6% 74.9% 88.4% 76.8% 79.7% 88.2% 75.6% Indian River 84.4% 66.7% 77.1% 78.3% 76.0% -- 80.1% Note:The symbol--means data are not available Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(ETAS),2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 51 128 - 53 ,Kind aril:,u-1:011 Table 64 shows the Florida Kindergarten Readiness Screener (FLKRS) results in Indian River and Florida for the 2012-2013 school year. To obtain FLKRS results, elements from the Early Childhood Observation System (ECHOS°) and the Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading (FAIR) are used in combination. See the glossary for a more complete description. In the 2012-13 school year, Indian River students fared better on both ECHOS°and FAIR readiness screeners compared to students in Florida as a whole. 92.0% of Indian River students were deemed ECHOS°ready and 78.0% were deemed FAIR ready, as compared to Florida's 91% and 72% respectively. Table 64:Florida Kindergarten Readiness Screener Results,2012-13 ECHOS FAIR % / FAIR ECHOS Not ECHOS FAIR NotR % °° ECHOS %FAIR FAIR County/School Name ECHOSNot Ready# Ready Total# Ready# Ready Total# Read Not Ready Read # # y Read y Indian River 1,122 94 1,216 931 264 1,195 92% 8% 78% 22% Rosewood Magnet School 66 4 70 80 8 88 94% 6% 91% 9% Osceola Magnet School 88 1 89 82 7 89 99% 1% 92% 8% Beachland Elementary 77 * 77 58 17 75 100% 77% 23% School Fellsmere Elementary 71 15 86 47 33 80 83% 17% 59% 41% School Pelican Island Elementary 67 1 68 57 9 66 99% 1% 86% 14% School Citrus Elementary School 84 10 94 54 30 84 89% 11% 64% 36% Dodgertown Elementary 62 5 67 48 13 61 93% 7% 79% 21% School Vero Beach Elementary 87 15 102 62 40 102 85% 15% 61% 39% School Sebastian Elementary 58 4 62 44 9 53 94% 6% 83% 17% School Glendale Elementary 79 4 83 59 25 84 95% 5% 70% 30% School Highlands Elementary 62 13 75 46 30 76 83% 17% 61% 39% School Liberty Magnet School 69 9 78 65 6 71 88% 12% 92% 8% Treasure Coast 81 10 91 62 28 90 89% 11% 69% 31% Elementary St Peter's Academy 40 * 40 40 0 40 100% * 100% 0% North County Charter 38 * 38 35 3 38 100% * 92% 8% School Imagine Schools at South 93 3 96 92 6 98 97% 3% 94% 6% Vero Saint Helen School No data No data No data No data No data No data No data No data No data No data Florida 172,437 16,740 189,177 140,262 54,170 194,432 91% 9% 72% 28% Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(EIAS),2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 `Indicates population fewer than 10 52JPa ,-�f Caunty Chilciren ' s Ass - ssmn ` _ - 2-e - �� Table 65 shows the calculated district readiness rates by school site for Pre-K program in 2012-2013 based on Fall 2013. The table below illustrates the distinction between charter schools and the other school within the Indian River school district. Data shows Florida Kindergarten Readiness rates were higher in charter schools which averaged 87%, 19 percentage points greater than the average non- magnet schools in the county's school district. Two magnet schools (Osceola and Rosewood)achieved scores that were comparable to charter schools and even exceeded north charter and Imagine charter school scores. Table 65:Calculated District Readiness Rates by School Site for Pre-K Program in Indian River Year 2012-2013 Based on Fall 2013. Site Score(%of Students"Ready") Beachland 74% Citrus 72% Dodgertown 63% Fellsmere 44% Glendale 65% Highlands 49% Liberty Magnet 75% Osceola Magnet 95% Pelican Island 78% Rosewood Magnet 89% Sebastian 70% Treasure Coast 60% Vero Beach 53% School District of Indian River County Average 68% Charter Schools North County Charter 81% Imagine 87% St.Peter's 100% Charter School Average 87% All Average 71% Source:School District of Indian River County,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 53 cz8 - 5s t-loijd,I The Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test started in 1998 as the state's plan to increase student achievement by way of implementing higher standards in the areas of mathematics, reading, writing, and science. During the 2010-11 school year, Florida began transitioning from FCAT to FCAT 2.0 and the Florida End-of-Course (EOC)Assessments, changing some of the logistics of testing, but still including the same areas of study. Please see the glossary at the end of this report for a description of FCAT scoring. Table 66 shows the percentage of students in Indian River County and Florida, grades 3 — 10, scoring 3 and above on the FCAT 2.0, in 2013 and 2014. Table 66:Students Scoring 3 and Above on FCAT,Indian River,Florida,2013 and 2014 Indian River Florida Grade Level 2013 2014 2013 2014- Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math 3 58% 49% 56% 49% 57% 58% 57% 58% 4 61% 55% 59% 52% 60% 61% 61% 63% 5 60% 51% 63% 52% 60% 55% 61% 56% 6 58% 49% 58% 45% 59% 52% 60% 53% 7 58% 49% 54% 44% 57% 55% 57% 56% 8 56% 12% 58% 18% 56% 51% 57% 47% 9 57% NA 50% NA 53% NA 53% NA 10 60% NA 61% NA 54% NA 55% NA Source:Florida Department of Education,Florida 2.0 Comprehensive Assessment Test,2013&2014 Note:NA indicates the test was not given for that year or is not administered for the selected grade level Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 Table 67 shows FCAT math percentage rates for achievement level three and above for Indian River schools grades 3 to 8 in 2013. Asian, Non-Hispanic had the highest percentage from 3 through 7 grade, with the exception of the 5th grade at which White non-Hispanic students excelled greatest. Black or African American Non-Hispanic students ranked lowest at all grade levels. Table 67:FCAT Math,Indian River Schools,Percent Greater than or Equal to Level 3 in 2013 Black or AfricanWhite Non- Asian Non- Multiracial Grade American,Non- Hispanic/Latino Total Students Hispanic Hispanic Hispanic Non-Hispanic 3 59% 27% 75% 51% 42% 49% 4 63% 26% 6% 52% 51% 550 5 63% 20% 56% 40% 48% 51% 6 60% 21% 60% 52% 41% 49% 7 58% 22% 64% 50% 45% 48% 8 17% 4% 0% 0% 14% 12% Source:Florida Department of Education,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida 2014 541 P e — r 6 I7 C: ( roG n i `/ h i d ^c il ' S ASses5 rn r, r 2 128.5 � Table 68 shows FCAT reading percentage for achievement level three and above in Indian River schools grades 3 to 8 in 2013. White non-Hispanic students had the highest percentage passes in FLAT reading scores in 5 of the 8 grade levels listed in the table below. Asian, Non-Hispanic achieved the highest in 5th 9th and 10th grade. Black or African American Non-Hispanic students ranked lowest at all grade levels for FLAT reading scores. Table 68:FCAT Reading,Indian River Schools,Percent Greater than or Equal to Level in 2013 Black or African > Non. p►sian,Non- Multiracial, Nispanic[LatinoTofiaf idents Grade Hispanic American,Non- Hispanic Non4illspanic 72% 32% 68% 63% 45% 58% 3 4 71% 40% 64% 50% 52% 61% 5 72% 38% 78% 51% 47% 60% 6 70% 31% 56% 52% 50% 58% 7 71% 31% 68% 53% 45% 58% g 66% 34% 38% 53% 44% 56% g 67% 30% 75% 54% 42% 57% 10 68% 34% 71% 68% 48% 60% Source:Florida Department of Education,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida 2014 55 t 28. 17 Table 69 shows the number and percentage of elementary and middle school students in Indian River and Florida not promoted in 2010—2012. In Indian River, the number of elementary school students not promoted ranged from 149 to 224 (1.9% - 2.7%) and the number of middle school students not promoted ranged from 54 to 145 (1.3% - 3.5%). Table 69:Elementary and High School Students Not Promoted,Indian River and Florida,2010,2011,2012 Indian River Florida Elementary Middle School Elementary Middle School Count Rate(%) Count Rate(%) Rate(%) Rate(%°) 2010 149 1.9% 54 1.3% 3.3% 2.2% 2011 226 2.8% 98 2.4% 3.6% 2.3% 2012 224 2.7% 145 E3.5% 3.7% 2.2% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(ETAS),2013 Data Notes:Data is for school year(September-June) Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Graduation Rates Table 70 shows high school graduation rates in Indian River and in Florida for the 2009-10 school year through the 2013-14 school year. The graduation rate in Indian River in the 2013-14 school year was 79.1% a slight decrease from the previous school year and a bit higher than Florida's rate of 76.1% during the same year. Please see the glossary at the end of the report for a description of the federal graduation rate. Table 70:Federal High School Graduation Rates,Indian River and Florida, 2009-10-2013-14 County 2009-10 2010-11 2011 -12 2012-2013 2013-2014 Florida 69.0% 70.6% 74.5% 75.6% 76.1% Indian River 67.2% 71.7% 80.9% 80.1% 79.1% Notes:The federal uniform graduation rate replaces the National Governors Association(NGA)rate,which is no longer calculated. Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(ETAS),2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 56 � :� a -- , n d i a f, r' 1 `1 ( S �A S S C ; S f x '(1 1 � G� 129•x6 A student who withdraws from school and does not transfer to another school or other education program is counted as a dropout. The dropout rate is the percentage of 91h through 12th students who dropout compared to the total, yearlong student membership of 9th through 12th graders. Table 71 shows the 9th through 12th grade single-year dropout rates for Indian River County and Florida from 2009-10 to 2013-14. Indian River had consistently lower dropout rates than Florida during the time period shown. During the 2013-14 school year, 0.4% of students in Indian River drooped out of high school as compared to Florida's dropout rate of 4.3% during the same year. Table 71:Single-Year,9`h-12`r'Grade Dropout Rates,Indian River,Florida,2009-10-- 2013-14 2009.10 2010.11 2011 .12 2012.13 2013.2014 Florida 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% 4.3% Indian River 1.7% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(ETAS)Data Report,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 Stability Rate Table 72 shows the stability rates in Indian River and Florida for the 2012-2013 school year. The stability rate is the percentage of students from the October membership survey who remain enrolled in the second semester survey (February). Membership refers to the total student population. The stability rates in Indian River and Florida were similar in the 2012-13 school year, 95.5% and 95.2%, respectively. Table 72:Stability Rates,Indian River and Florida,2012-2013 October 2012 Membership February 2013 Membership Stability Rate Florida 2,685,794 2,556,838 95.2% Indian River 17,796 17,003 95.5% Source:Florida Department of Education,Data Report 2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 57 Table 73 shows the counts and rates of total suspensions, including in-and out-of-school suspensions, in Indian River County and Florida during the 2012-13 school year. The rate of suspensions, both out- of-school and in-school for the county was higher than the state's. Table 73:Total Suspensions,Counts and Rates,Indian River and Florida,2012-13 Indian River Florida. Out-of-School In-School Out-of-School. In-School' Count Rate(%°) Count Rate(%) Count Rate(%) Count Rate(%) 1,558 8.6% 1,488 8.5% 177,736 6.6% 211,179 7.9% Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(ETAS),Data Report,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 Table 74 shows the total suspension counts and rates for the 2011/12 and 2012/13 school years in Indian River and Florida. Indian River had considerably higher rates for out-of-school compared to Florida during this period, though there was a decrease of both out-of-school and in-school suspensions in Indian River and Florida in 2012-2013 from the previous year. Table 74:Total Suspensions,Counts and Rates,Indian River and Florida,2011-2013 Indian River Florida Out-of-School In-School 06t-of-Sch6ols .fin-School' Rate per Rate per Rate per Rate per Count 1,000 ' Count 1,000 Count 1,000 Count 1,000 students students students students 2011/12 1,654 1 92.1 11494 83.2 197,488 74.0 1 228,198 85.5 2012/13 1,558 1 86.5 1,488 1 82.6 177,736 66.1 211,179 1 78.6 Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(EIAS),Data Report,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 58 I P I n d i a n 113, I v e r C ti '_1 c r e n ' s A. s e s s rn e n t 2 0 1 12� • Gv r I l I I d +ill':`,, Table 75 shows school lunch program eligibility in Indian River County and Florida from the 2008-09 school year through the 2013-14 school year. Federal Income Eligibility Guidelines (IEGs) are used to determine each student's eligibility for free and reduced price meals. Over the past several years, the number of students eligible for free/reduced-price lunch had steadily increased in Indian River until this last school year when there was a slight decrease. During the 2013-14 school year, more than half, 56.62%, of pre-kindergarten (PK) through 12th grade students in Indian River County were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch. Table 75:PK-12 Students Eligible for Free/Reduced-Price Lunch,Indian River, Florida,2008-09-2013-14 Florida Indian River Total Number of Total fllgible %of 1231gible Total iillumber of Total Eligible %of Errgible Students Students, Students Students Students Students' 2008/09 2,631,629 1,304,861 49.58% 17,606 8,048 45.71% 2009/10 2,635,115 1,408,976 53.47% 17,750 8,936 50.34% 2010/11 2,643,826 1,480,760 56.01% 17,740 9,527 53.70% 2011/12 2,667,830 1,536,044 57.58% 17,964 9,979 55.55% 2012/13 2,692,162 1,576,720 58.57% 18,011 10,196 56.61% 2013/14 2,720,797 1,475,961 54.25% 18,078 10,237 56.62% Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(EIAS),Data Report,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 Table 76 shows children in school-readiness programs eligible for free/reduced lunch in Indian River and Florida in 2008, 2009 and 2010. There was a trending decline in the number of children in the school-readiness program in both Florida and Indian River from 2008 to 2010. Table 76:Children in school-readiness programs eligible for free/reduced lunch,Indian River and Florida,2008,2009 and 2010 Indian'fitiver Florida Year Count bate i%1 countRate /61 2008 719 54.4% 146,655 59.3% 2009 936 57.4% 129,486 53.8% 2010 665 41.7% 131,033 55.5% Note:Source:FloridaCHARTS, Florida Department of Health,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 59 t2d - � l Table 77 shows the lunch status by school in Indian River from 2013 to 2014. There was a total of 18,078 member recorded in the school district of which, 51.4% received free lunches and 5.2% benefited from reduced priced lunches. Table 77:Lunch Status by School,Indian River County,School Year 2013-2014 School Name Total Members #Free #Reduced Priced DISTRICT 18,078 9,293 944 VERO BEACH HIGH SCHOOL 2,790 1,178 131 ALTERNATIVE CTR FOR EDUCATION 51 39 ROSEWOOD MAGNET SCHOOL 550 198 22 OSCEOLA MAGNET SCHOOL 536 179 30 BEACHLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 599 241 GIFFORD MIDDLE SCHOOL 872 464 28 FELLSMERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 681 629 27 PELICAN ISLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 481 336 54 WABASSO SCHOOL 121 73 CITRUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 676 511 33 DODGERTOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 448 359 15 VERO BEACH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 687 553 17 SEBASTIAN RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL 854 525 69 SEBASTIAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 531 327 35 GLENDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 491 353 23 HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 464 386 24 OSLO MIDDLE SCHOOL 920 586 74 SEBASTIAN RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 1,880 929 156 LIBERTY MAGNET SCHOOL 550 200 41 TREASURE COAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 647 410 35 STORM GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL 914 429 70 INDIAN RIVER CHARTER HIGH SCHL 673 50 ST.PETER'S ACADEMY 130 95 NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL 256 SEBASTIAN CHART JR HIGH SCHOOL 203 105 20 IMAGINE AT SOUTH VERO 899 38 EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION 174 96 Source:Florida Department of Education,2014 Data Note:An asterisk(*)replaces data when the cohort is fewer than ten students.A blank cell indicates no students in the cohort. Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 601 Pa g — I nCI Ia it i: I { 'i r (I S 55P55ttilPnL 70 . I !Z8 . 6� Table 78 shows percentage of elementary school students eligible for free/reduced lunch in Indian River and Florida for 2011, 2012 and 2013. There was no variation between the percentage of eligible students in the county and the state, the rate was consistently the same during this time. Table 78:Table Percent of elementary school students eligible for free/reduced lunch, Indian River and Florida, 2011-2013 Indian River Florida Year Count Rate("/a) Count Rate(0/a) 2011 5,101 62.6% 755,168 62.3% 2012 5,125 62.8% 768,447 62.8% 2013 5,369 1 65.2% 810,556 65.2% Data Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(ETAS) Complied by Health Council of southeast Florida,2014 Table 79 shows percentage of middle school students eligible for free/reduced lunch in Indian River and Florida for 2011, 2012, and 2013. Noted during this time was consistent upward trend of eligible middle school students in both the county and the state. Table 79:Percent of middle school students eligible for free/reduced lunch in Indian River and Florida,2011-2013 Indian River Florida Year count Rate(%) count Rate(%) 2011 2,335 56.9% 356,954 58.6% 2012 2,400 58.7% 366,989 59.8% 2013 2,410 58.9% 376,328 61.3% Data Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(ETAS) Data Note(s):The number of elementary school students eligible for free/reduced school lunches divided by the total number of middle school students Complied by Health Council of southeast Florida,2014 61 � X2- 6 - 4 3 Table 80 shows the number of students in the Gifted Program, by race/ethnicity, in Indian River and Florida in 2012. Of the 766 students in the Gifted Program in Indian River, 80.0% were white, 4.3% were black or African American, 10.7% were Hispanic or Latino, 1.4% were Asian and 3.3% were two or more races. Table 80:Membership in Gifted Program,Fall 2012 Native American Black or, Hawaiian or Hispanic n or Two or White African; Asian diner . Total Latino: Alaska .. More Races. American Pacific Native Islander Florida 84,117 14,308 43,059 9,389 143 392 5,312 156,720 Indian River 613 33 82 11 26 766 Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(EIAS),2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Notes:An asterisk indicates that there are no students in the cohort Emotionally Handicapped Students Table 81 shows the percentage of students in Indian River County and Florida, grades K-12, who were emotionally handicapped, in 2011, 2012, and 2013. This indicator includes children who are emotionally handicapped (EH) and severely emotionally disturbed (SED). In 2013, 0.5% of the student population in Indian River was considered emotionally handicapped compared to 0.7% in Florida. The percent in Indian River has remained stable during the time period shown. Table 81:Children in School Grades K-12 who are Emotionally Handicapped, Indian River,Florida,2013 2011 2012 2013 Number of P Number of Number of Students Percent Students Percent Students Percent Florida 20,717 0.8% 18,968 0.7% 17,869 0.7% Indian River 84 0.5% 84 0.5% 92 0.5% Source:Florida Department of Education,Education Information and Accountability Services(EIAS),2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 62 ? 2 II e — I n d i a n R I v e r C o u _ , ri r e ': A 5 3 e 3 3 rn e n t 2 0 1 4 4'�-8 - 41 2-- 2.4 ) Table 82 shows a follow-up of prior year high school graduates in Indian River and Florida in 2010-11. The below data shows the percentage of students who were either: employed full time or part time, continuing their education or both continuing their education and employed. In Indian River, 45% were employed either full or part time, 67% were continuing their education, and of those continuing their education, 33% were employed. Table 82:Follow-Up of Prior Year Graduates,2011-2012 Employed FullTme or Employed Full rime Continuing Educatium Of Cont Ed,°I° Partttx�e `;Empfioyed Florida 45% 64% 47% Indian River 44% 1 10% 1 61% 47% Note:Asterisk(*)indicates no data available Source:Florida Department of Education,Florida Education&Training Placement Information Program(FETPIP),2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 ExpenditUres per StLldent Table 83 shows the current expenditures per unweighted, full time equivalent (FTE) student in grades K-12, for the 2012-13 school year. In Indian River, there was $7,894 in expenditures per unweighted FTE; the average amount in Florida was$8,253 per student. Table 83:Current Expenditures per K-12 Unweighted Full Time Equivalent(FTE)Student,2012-2013 Unweighted IFTE Current Expenditures Expenditures per UFfE Florida 2,656,449.95 $21,923,117,067 $8,253 Indian River 17,755.96 $140,162,463 $7,894 Source:Florida Department of Education,School of Business Services,Office of Funding and Financial Reporting,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 63 The Florida Bright Futures Scholarship Program is Florida's largest merit-based scholarship and provides scholarships based on high school academic achievement. Table 84 shows Bright Futures Scholarship disbursements between 1997 and 2014 in Indian River County and Florida. Additionally, the table shows the percentage of total scholarship disbursements that Indian River students received. In the 2013-14 school year, Indian River students received 0.67% of the total Bright Futures Scholarship money disbursed in the state of Florida. Table 84:Bright Futures Scholarship Disbursements 1997-98—2013-14 Florida Indian River Disbursements Disbursements %of Total Disbursements 1997-98 $69,263,553 $345,522 0.50% 1998-99 $93,906,554 $533,284 0.57% 1999-00 $131,849,245 $769,577 0.58% 2000-01 $164,845,459 $1,046,731 0.63% 2001-02 $174,914,916 $1,130,015 0.65% 2002-03 $202,204,806 $1,342,848 0.66% 2003-04 $235,188,754 $1,578,816 0.67% 2004-05 $268,896,952 $1,771,528 0.66% 2005-06 $306,335,218 $1,991,514 0.65% 2006-07 $347,014,439 $2,183,299 0.63% 2007-08 $379,874,911 $2,444,108 0.64% 2008-09 $429,012,109 $2,732,731 0.64% 2009-10 $423,532,775 $2,666,752 0.63% 2010-11 $421,471,950 $2,828,751 0.67% 2011-12 $333,832,499 $2,179,014 0.65% 2012-13 $312,150,590 $2,024,015 0.65% 2013-14 $303,419,763 $2,027,087 0.67% Source:Florida Department of Education,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 64ndian R 1 v e r Counr %/ CIi ! dre :i : - ssmeni: 2014- 6O-( - 4g Figure 9 shows the amount of Bright Futures Scholarship disbursements in Indian River County between 1997 and 2012 (shown on the left vertical axis) and the percentage of total statewide scholarship disbursements that Indian River students received (shown on the right vertical axis). Figure 9:Bright Futures Scholarship Disbursements,Indian River,Florida 1997-98—2013-14 Bright Futures Scholarship Disbursements,Indian River County,1997-2014 $3,000,000 0.80% ^ ' ' 0.70% ti $2,500,000 N 0.60% o o $2,000,000 ` 0 0.50% o o � R $1,500,000 0.40% 22 � o E LL 0.30% w $1,000,000 N 0 0.20% O 5 $500,000 W 'a 0.10% m $0 _ 0.00% 00 OO 00 O� O� 00 OD 1;O00 O� 00 OO OO,�. O00 OOH 000 00� OOH OOH OOH OOH OO�O OOH OOH OOo; Opp O�N 0 4 1 Disbursements %of Total FL Disbursements Source:Florida Department of Education,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 65 12 -Q -C , Table 85 shows participation in extracurricular activities in Indian River and Florida, by age group, in 2014. Table 85:Youth who Reported Participation in Extracurricular Activities,Indian River,Florida,2014 Indian River Florida Ages 10-14` Ages 15-17 Ages 10-14 Ages 15-17 School Sports 39.0% 40.6% 35.7% 40.7% Organized Sports Outside of School 45.6% 24.3% 43.8% 26.7% School Band 18.1% 15.9% 14.4% 7.1% School Club(s) 19.3% 27.8% 22.2% 31.1% Community Club(s) 12.8% 15.0% 9.8% 13.6% Source:Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Child Welfare Abtise and Neglect Table 86 shows the number and rate of children ages 5-11 who experienced child abuse in Indian River County and Florida between 2010 and 2012. During this time, the child abuse rate decreased from 12.2 to 10.4 per 1,000 individuals in the age group in Indian River, and from 17.8 to 12.2 per 1,000 in Florida. Table 86:Children Experiencing Child Abuse Ages 5-11, Indian River,Florida,2010,2011,2012 2010 2011 2012 Counts Rate per 1,000 Counts Rate per 1,000 Counts Rate per 1,000 Florida 17,942 17.8 19,154 12.5 18,817 12.2 Indian River 121 12.2 101 10.1 104 10.4 Source:FlohdaCHARTS,Florida Department of Children and Families,2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 87 shows number and rate of verified child abuse cases in Indian River County and Florida for fiscal year 2012-13. Verified cases of child abuse include an unduplicated number of children who were considered alleged victims of child maltreatment and upon investigation, the determination was made that they did indeed endure some type of maltreatment. In 2012-13 in Indian River, 1.12% of children were victims of verified child abuse. 66 - rl 18 n F i '1 t;: i r J l? fl 'l' y ( it I i r r 2 s i 15 n is 7 {) 1 1 Table 87:Verified Child Abuse Rate,Indian River, Florida,Fiscal Year 2012-13 Number of Verified Cases 2012.13 Child Population Ages 0.17 Rate Florida 49,289 4,016,465 1.23% Indian River 288 25,787 1.12% Source:Florida Department of Children and Families,2013 Notes:The fiscal year begins July 1,2012 and ends June 30,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 ReIIIIItICat1011S Table 88 shows the percentage of children who were discharged to reunification with their parent(s)or caretaker in Indian River County and Florida between 2010 and 2012. The rate of discharges to reunification decreased by 3 percentage points in Florida between 2010 and 2012 and increased by 10.7 percentage points in Indian River. Table 88:Children Discharged to Reunification with Parent(s)/Caretaker,Indian River, Florida, 2010,2011,2012 2010 2011 2012 Florida 48.6% 46.2% 45.6% Indian River 36.7% 51.9% 47.4% Note:Percentages were determined with the number of total discharges as the denominator Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Children and Families,2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Foster Care Table 89 shows the number and rate of infants who were in foster care in Indian River and Florida in 2008 through 2012. The rate decreased substantially in Indian River from 33.5 per 1,000 individuals in 2008 to 14.7 per 1,000 individuals in 2012. Even though the rate decreased in Indian River, in 2012 it was still higher than the rate in Florida (11.7 per 1,000 individuals). Due to the relatively small number of occurrences, a small change in the number of events will influence the rate. Table 89:Infants in Foster Care,Indian River,Florida 2008,2009,2010,2011,2012 2er 008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Count1000 Rate per Ra P �oc�rrtper I'M Counft t Ono CountRath � LL laount1,000 Florida 5,188 22.5 4,680 21.3 4,732 21.1 4,822 21.6 2,450 11.7 Indian River 44 33.5 1 16 12.8 30 25.3 28 26.3 15 14.7 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Children and Families,2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 67 Figure 10 shows the rates of infants in foster in Indian River and Florida, from 2008 through 2012. Figure 10:Infants in Foster Care,Indian River,Florida 2008,2009,2010,2011,2012 Infants in Foster Care,Rate per 100,000,Indian River,Florida 40 I --- -- -- - _ 33.5 35 — i 0 30 - -- --- 25.3 ------ 0 25 ;-- — —— _ — - -- -------— -0 Indian River 20 .,,---._-—2-2-.5— 21.3 21.1 14.7 Florida 15 _,__._ 10 -__- ---------128----------------._._.....--------___-------- T1:T---- 5 J,-- — -- _ _— —_ 0 _ ------- -- -------- --... --- -------_ ---------, 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Table 90 shows children, ages 5-11, who were in foster care in Indian River and Florida in 2008 through 2012. During the time period shown, the rate of children in foster care in Indian River fluctuated ranging from 297.9 to 539 per 100,000. Due to the relatively small number of occurrences, a small change in the number of events will influence the rate. Table 90:Children in Foster Care,Ages 5-11, Indian River, Florida 2008,2009,2010,2011,2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Count Rate per Count Rate per Count Rate per Count Rate per Count Rate per 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Florida 6,598 410.4 5,353 333.9 5,158 337.8 5,349 348.1 5,451 352.3 Indian 53 539.0 29 297.9 30 301.7 36 360.8 50 498.3 River l I Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Children and Families,2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 681Pae rii_Y CniId, res ,4ss _ > 3 Figure 11 shows the rates of children, ages 5-11, in foster in Indian River and Florida, from 2008 through 2012. Figure 11:Children in Foster Care,Ages 5-11,Indian River,Florida 2008,2009,2010, 2011,2012 Children in Foster Care,Ages 5-11,Indian River,Florida 2008-2012 600 539 550 498.3 500 0 0 450 CD —+—Indian River CL 400 410.4 360.8 Florida 350 333.9 337.8 348.1 352.3 300 Y97.9 301.7 250 200 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Figure 12 shows the rates of children, ages 12-17, in foster in Indian River and Florida, from 2008 through 2012. Figure 12:Children in Foster Care,Ages 12-17,Indian River,Florida 2008,2009,2010,2011,2012 Children in Foster Care,Ages 12-17,Indian River,Florida 2008-2012 650 620.5 600 497.1 550 CD 0 500 558.4 453.3 445.3 0 0 L 450 - 495.4 424,8 Indian River a CL Florida 400 432.6 414.7 350 300 319.2 250 200 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 69 t24 ' ? � Table 91 shows children, ages 12-17, who were in foster care in Indian River and Florida in 2008 through 2012. During the time period shown, the rate in both the county and state decreased. In 2012, the rate of children in foster care for this age group in Indian River was 319.2 per 100,000 individuals, in comparison to Florida's 424.8 per 100,000. Table 91:Children in Foster Care,Ages 12-17,Indian River,Florida 2008,2009,2010,2011,2012 2008- �2009 w:Y. . 2010 2011 -2012 Count Rate per Count Rate°per Count Rate per Count Rate per Count Rate per 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Florida 7,978 558.4 7,062 497.1 6,378 453.3 6,244 445.3 5,945 424.8 Indian River 57 620.5 45 495.4 40 432.6 38 414.7 29 319.2 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Children and Families,2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 G,i A11dp.11-,.iIl I Table 92 shows grandparents who live with or care for grandchildren in Indian River and Florida from 2008 to 2012. More than 71.8% of grandparents who were responsible for the care of their grandchildren in Indian River were women. The portion of grandparents who were responsible for the care of their grandchildren was approximately the same in Indian River and Florida during this 5 year period. In Indian River 12.1% and in Florida 13.7% of grandparents had been responsible for their grandchildren over 5 years. Table 92:Grandparents Living with or Caring for Grandchildren,Indian River,Florida(5 year estimate 2008-2012) Florida Indian River Estimate Percent Estimate Percent GRANDPARENTS Number of grandparents living with own grandchildren under 18 years 443,585 2,174 Responsible for grandchildren 163,866 36.9% 805 37.0% Years responsible for grandchildren Less than 1 year 38,121 8.6% 275 12.6% 1 or 2 years 38,781 8.7% 209 9.6% 3 or 4 years 26,303 5.9% 58 2.7% 5 or more years 60,661 13.7% 263 12.1% Number of grandparents responsible for own grandchildren under 18 yrs 163,866 805 Who are female 103,684 63.3% 578 71.8% Who are married 113,685 69.4% 537 66.7% Source:US Census Bureau,2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 701Pa e - 1nrji f r �junChildren ' s Asses m ._ ; ;_ , othec CIOld X1+1:,1;-B!"I 't � Table 93 shows involvement with bullying behavior in Indian River and Florida's middle and high school students. In 2014, 42.5% of Indians River's middle school students reported that bullying caused worry and well over a third reported being taunted or teased within the past 30 days. 4.4% of females in Indian River reported being a victim of cyber bullying the past 30 days compared to 4% of males; these rates are higher than the state's. Table 93:Youth who Reported Involvement in Bullying Behavior,Indian River and Florida,2014 Indian River Florida diddle High r10.3% male Maid Middle' Nigh Female Male' School School ool School Bullying Caused Worry 42.5% 28.2% .7% 24.0% 42.3% 27.5% 44.1% 24.2% Skipped School Because of Bullying 8.1% 7.9% 5.3% 5.6% 6.2% 8.7% 3.3% Was Kicked or Shoved in the Past 30 Days 18.9% 9.9% 12.4% 15.5% 18.1% 7.5% 10.7% 13.3% Was Taunted or Teased in the Past 30 Days 38.4% 23.3% 35.2% 24.1% 36.1% 22.1% 30.8% 25.4% Was Victim of Cyber Bullying in Past 30 Days 10.0% 10.6% 14.5% 6.4% 7.3% 7.5% 10.6% 4.3% Physically Bullied Others in the Past 30 Days 5.9% 3.5% 3.8% 5.1% 7.5% 4.8% 4.6% 7.2% Verbally Bullied Others in the Past 30 Days 15.7% 8.6% 12.4% �4.0% % 14.2% 10.2% 11.2% 12.7% Cyber Bullied Others in the Past 30 Days 3.8% 4.3% 4.4% 3.1% 3.9% 4.0% 3.2% Source:Florida Youth Risk Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 School Safety and Violent Acts Table 94 shows the percentage of middle and high school students in Indian River and Florida who reported feeling safe at school. The percentages of students in both middle and high school in Indian River who reported feeling safe were greater than in Florida in the time period shown. Table 94:Middle School and High School Students Who Reported Feeling Safe at School,Indian River,Florida,2008,2010, 2012 Indian River Florida Year Kiddie School High School Mlddlildi fol High School 2008 73.5% 83.4% 72.7% 71.1% 2010 76.9% 84.8% 76.3% 76.7% 2012 81.8% 85.8% 79.1% 79.8% Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Children and Families,Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 71 � � 25 - � 3 Table 95 shows the number of violent acts per 1,000 students (K-12) in school activities in Indian River and Florida. Violent acts include sexual battery, battery, weapons possession and fighting. The rate in Indian River ranged from a low of 4.5per 1,000 in 2012 to a high of 6.5 per 1,000 students in 2011. Table 95:Violent acts per 1,000 students in school activities grades K-12,Indian River and Florida,2010,2011,2012 Indian River Florida. Count Rate per 1,000 Count Rate per i,000 2010 94 5.3 40,219 15.2 2011 117 6.5 37,303 14 2012 81 4.5 31,268 11.6 Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Education,Office of Safe Schools Data Notes:Includes Sexual Battery,Battery,Weapons Possession,and Fighting. Data are for school years(September-June). Due to a reclassification of some violent acts in 2008,the total number of violent acts dropped substantially Compiled by Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 96 shows the percent of high school students in Indian River and Florida who reported seeing delinquent behavior among gang members at school. The rate who reported seeing fighting, vandalism and carrying of a weapon was higher in Indian River than in the state as a whole. Table 96:High School Students Who Reported Having Seen Delinquent Behavior among Gang Members at School this Year,Indian River,Florida,2012 Fighting Stealing or Vanda'lism Selling Drugs Carrying Weapons Robbing (including Grafit Indian River 40.0% 21.8% 28.7% 30.0% 17.9% Florida 36.7% 23.3% 24.8% 30.5% 15.8% Source:Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey,2012 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Table 97 shows the percentage of high school students who reported gang membership in 2014. The rates for Indian River are considerably higher than the rates for Florida. Table 97:Middle and High School Students who Reported Gang Membership,by Gender in Indian River and Florida,2014 Indian River Florida Middle HighMiddle High School School Female Male School School Female Male Have you ever belonged to a gang? 4.8 4.5 2 7.1 3.6 3.7 2.5 4.8 Did that gang have a name? 38.4 21.1 13.9 35 26.6 16.8 16.2 23.3 Are you a gang member now? 2.4 0.7 4 2.1 1.5 2.6 Source:Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 C r a ? $ �, 5 e S S rn !l _t 7 0 1 I;L 7 Ll Table 98 shows the number of youths referred to Juvenile Justice in Indian River County in Florida from 2011-12 to 2013-14. Although the total population in the county and state increased during the time shown, the number of youths referred decreased. In the 2013-14, Indian River had 507 youths referred to juvenile justice, 6 individuals less than in 2012-13. Table 98:Youths Referred to Juvenile Justice(Total Offenses),Indian River, Florida,2011-12,2013-14 2011.2012 2012.2013 2013-2014` Florida 97,234 85,601 78,447 Indian River 648 513 507 Source:Florida Department of Juvenile Justice,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 Table 99 shows the number of youths referred to juvenile just by race and gender in Indian River and Florida from 2011-12 to 2013-14. In Indian River, during the time period shown, the greatest number of referrals was black males. In Florida, black males also had the greatest number of referrals. In 2013- 14, in Indian River, there were 2.8 times more male than female referrals, which is comparable to Florida's referral patterns. Table 99:Youths Referred to Juvenile Justice by Race and Gender,Indian River,Florida,2011-12,2012-13,2013-14 Indian River Florida 20112012 20132013. 20132014 2014-2012 2012.2013 2013.2014 Total Offenses 648 513 507 97,234 85,601 78,447 Male Black 174 169 187 33,706 30,671 29,745 Hispanic 58 40 33 11,138 9,542 8,880 Other 1 1 0 362 314 217 White 230 148 156 25,755 22,879 20,143 Total Male 463 358 376 71,961 63,406 58,985 Female Black 88 60 57 11,258 10,287 9,177 Hispanic 21 14 8 3,209 2,835 2,472 Other 1 1 2 165 159 138 White 75 80 64 10,641 8,917 7,675 Total Female 1 185 155 131 25,273 22,195 19,462 Source:Florida Department of Juvenile Justice,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 73 1Z8 . 7S Table 100 shows the number of youths referred for delinquency for a felony offense in Indian River and Florida from 2011-12 to 2013-14. The number of referrals in Indian River fluctuated during this time, with 143 in 2013-14. Table 100:Youths Referred for Delinquency for a Felony Offense,Indian River,Florida,2011-12-2013-14 2011-2012 2012.2013 2013-2014 Florida 29,322 26,467 25,773 Indian River 178 138 143 Source:Florida Department of Juvenile Justice,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 Table 101 shows youths referred for delinquency for a misdemeanor offense in Indian River County and Florida from 2011-12 to 2013-14. Felony referrals in both the county and state decreased. In Indian River ranged from 339 to 269. Table 101:Youths Referred for Delinquency for a Misdemeanor Offense,Indian River,Florida,2011-12-2013-14 2011=2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Florida 45,255 39,322 34,832 Indian River 339 289 269 Source:Florida Department of Juvenile Justice,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 Table 102 shows the number youths referred for delinquency for other offenses in Indian River and Florida from 2011-12 through 2013-14. Other offenses include: violation of probation, previously deferred, transferred for disposition, contempt, interstate compact, violation of aftercare, local ordinance, traffic (non-felony), and infraction. During the time period shown, the number of referrals in Indian River fluctuated, with 131 in 2011-12 to the lowest number, 85, in 2012-13. Florida's numbers during this same time steadily decreased. Table 102:Youths Referred for Delinquency for Other Offenses,Indian River Florida,2011-12-2013-14 2011-2012 2012-2013 EE2%17,842 2014 Florida 22,657 19,812 Indian River 131 86 5 Note:"Other Offenses"include:violation of probation,previously deferred,transferred for disposition,contempt,interstate compact,violation of aftercare,local ordinance, traffic(non-felony),and infraction. Source:Florida Department of Juvenile Justice,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 74 d 2 — i t1Cj I i7 IVp r CO4-i Ass ssFlt n c q Figure 13 shows referrals for felonies, misdemeanors, and other offenses in Indian River and Florida from 2009-10 to 2013-14. Figure 13:Youths Referred to Juvenile Justice by Delinquency Type, Indian River, 2009-10-2013-14 Youths Referred to Juvenile Justice by Delinquency Type,Indian River,2009-2014 800 721 700 671 648 N 600 513 507 d 500 435 Felonies 0 400 361 339 W 289 269 ■Misdemeanors 300 Z 200 187 187 178 138 143 123 99 131 86 95 100 0 _ _ _ 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Source:Florida Department of Juvenile Justice,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2015 75 ( 2- F7b Table 103 shows the relative rate (RR) index compared with White Juveniles in Indian River County in Florida from July 2012 to June 2013. Relative risk (RR) is the ratio of the probability an event occurring (for example, developing a disease, being injured) in an exposed group to the probability of the event occurring in a comparison, non-exposed group. Black or African American youths had the highest RR for juvenile arrest (4.67), therefore, Black or African American youth were nearly 5 times more likely to be arrested than their white counterpart. Table 103:Relative Rate Index compared with White Juveniles,Indian River,July 2012—June 2013 Native American Black or Hawaiian or Hispanic Indian or Other/ 'All African- Asian other or LatinoAlaska Mixed Minorities American �Pac>fic, � Islanders Native Juvenile Arrests 4.67 0.99 * * ** 2.55 Refer to Juvenile Court 0.99 1.01 * * * ** 1.00 Cases Diverted 0.50 0.41 * * ** 0.50 Cases Resulting in Delinquent Findings 1.15 1.41 * * * ** 1.20 Cases Petitioned 0.91 0.58 * * * ** 0.86 Cases Involving Secure Detention 0.84 ** * * * ** 1.01 Cases resulting in Probation Placement 1.56 1.53 * * ** 1.53 Cases Resulting in Confinement in 3.08 '* * * ** 2.35 Secure Juvenile Correctional Cases Transferred to Adult Court ** ** * * * ** ** Group meets 1%threshold? Yes Yes No No No Yes Source:Juvenile Justice Planning Committee Key: Statistically significant results: Bold font Results that are not statistically significant Regular font Group is less than 1%of the youth population Insufficient number of cases for analysis Missing data for some element of calculation --- Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 � 28 � -71 Table 104 shows the population who resides in group quarters by, sex, age and the type of group quarters in Indian River in 2010. The under 18 years population accounted for 16.7% of the total (1,794) individuals living in group quarters, additional this age group also accounted for 17% of the total institutionalized population (1,346) in the county. However, the largest Institutionalized group quarters in Indian River at that time were Juvenile facilities (41%) and correctional facilities (35%). Figure 10 shows each Institutionalized group quarter category and the portion for which they account. Table 104:Group Quarters Population by Sex,Age and Type of Group Quarters in Indian River,2010 Subject Number Percent AGE Group quarters population 1,794 100% Under 18 years 299 16.7% Institutionalized population 1,346 100% Under 18 years 229 17.0% Noninstitutionalized population 448 100% Under 18 years 70 15.6% TYPE OF GROUP QUARTERS Group quarters population 1,794 100% Institutionalized population 1,346 75.1% Correctional facilities for adults 480 26.8% Juvenile facilities 548 30.5% Nursing facilities/Skilled-nursing facilities 255 14.2% Other institutional facilities 63 3.5% Noninstitutionalized population 448 25.0% College/University student housing 89 5.0% Military quarters 0 0.0% Other noninstitutional facilities 359 20.0% Source:US Census Bureau,2010 Complied by:Health Council of Southeast Florida 2014 77 I2 � - � � Figure 14:Institutionalized populations by group quarters in Indian River,2010 i I I 19% i i j I i i I, ■ Correctional facilities for adults j ■ Juvenile facilities �i Nursing facilities/Skilled-nursing facilities Other institutional facilities Source:US Census Bureau,2010 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 2C1 78 � C � �� ty Ci� i { rlr � �� ' s r. � � sr�' = r; r =`: Table 105 shows the numbers and rates of marriage dissolutions with minor children in Indian River County and Florida between 2008 and 2012. Marriage dissolutions include divorces and annulments. In 2012, the marriage dissolution rate involving minor children was 1.57 per 1,000 individuals in Indian River County, a slight increase from the rate in 2011, 1.43 per 1,000. Table 105:Dissolutions of Marriage With Minor Children,Indian River,Florida,2009,2010,2011,2012 2009 2010 2011, 2012 umber r31,602 Florida 29,647 1.58 1.68 32,470 1.71 30,702 1.61 Indian River 239 1.74 258 1.87 198 1.43 219 1.57 Source:Florida Vital Statistics Annual Report,2013 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 Figure 15 shows a comparison of marriage dissolutions with minor children in Indian River and Florida from 2008-2012, in graph form. Figure 1S:Dissolutions of Marriage With Minor Children,Indian River,Florida,2008,2009,2010,2011,2012 Rate of Dissolutions of Marriage With Minor Children, Indian River,Florida 2 1.87 1.8 1.75 1.74 1.68 1.71 1.66 1.61 1.58 1.57 0 1.6 1.43 C c. 1.4 0 a 0 1.2 Florida 0 1 ■Indian River Q 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 79 1z0 - 8 0 Table 106 shows the rate and number of domestic violence offenses in Indian River County and Florida from 2010 through 2013. During this time period, the rate in both the county and state decreased. In 2013, Indian River had a rate of 4.1 per 1,000 individuals, and Florida had a rate of 5.6 per 1,000 individuals. The number of offenses in Indian River ranged from 691 to 581 in the time period shown. Table 106:Domestic violence Offenses,Indian River,Florida,2010,2011,2012,2013 2010 2011 2012 2013 Offenses Rate per Offenses, Rat, per", Offenses Rate'per Offenses Rate per . 1,000 1,000 1,000` 1,000. Florida 113,378 6.0 111,681 5.9 108,046 5.7 108,030 5.6 Indian 691 5.0 620 4.5 582 4.2 581 4.1 River Source:FloridaCHARTS,Florida Department of Law Enforcement,2014 Compiled by:Health Council of Southeast Florida,2014 801nch t ,/ Children ' s A 5 S e S S i:-. _ ; _ — Community Perspective Overview The second phase of Indian River Children's Needs Assessment consisted of the collection and synthesis of information for the Community Perspective. The data contained herein is qualitative, primary data— it was obtained directly from the source and has not been previously published. This information was collected through: focus groups with members of the community and key informant interviews. The target populations and stakeholders for the key informant interviews were identified and engaged by the Health Council of Southeast Florida (HCSEF) under the advisement of an Advisory Group. Key Inforni-int Interviews - Mettiodology Eleven (11) in-depth key informant interviews were conducted with community stakeholders, representative from a broad range of sectors, including: law enforcement, faith institutions, community members/parents, school administration,juvenile justice, child care, judicial and county government. The purpose of the informant interviews was to collect information from a wide range of individuals with first-hand knowledge about the community, available services and resources. Their particular knowledge and understanding provided insight on the nature of problems and made recommendations for solutions. Each key informant interview was led by a skilled facilitator and lasted approximately 20-30 minutes and were conducted from August through September 2014. Interviews were conducted in English via telephone. The facilitator provided an overview of the process at the beginning of the interview and informants were assured that responses would only be presented in the aggregate. Interview discussion points used to guide interview, included the following (See Appendix A for tool): • What do you perceive are the key issues related to children's well-being? • What do you think are the biggest problems related to children's well-being in the Indian River community? • What services, programs, and resources do you believe are lacking in the community (example Age groups, geographies, race and ethnicity)? • What services, programs, and resources in the community are strong and/or beneficial (what's going well)? • Please offer suggestions for how to improve services and programs for children. 81 � 1 I -It lli" Y 1a. i�"' �I{�'�V-; — i� ':;ifl�.:; ,`^�. ��t� il�i?;.711 The following information was generated from the responses of the community stakeholders in Indian River. We have identified the primary opinions and thoughts of the group, their input and specific points. The unordered list of responses to each open-ended question is listed to address each query. What do you perceive are the key issues related to children's well-being? • Family stability; good home life • Quality child care and education • Meeting basic needs for food, shelter and clothing • Safe environment where people care about them • Ability to grow and develop • Access to services to help them grow and thrive • Physical, dental and mental health What do you think are the biggest problems related to children's well-being in the Indian River community? Poverty: • The biggest issue is poverty and economic-based issues • Creates challenges with health and juvenile justice • Disparity between very wealthy and very poor • Pockets of poverty (Wabasso, Gifford, South Oslo) • Lower middle class affected the most • Homelessness • Not a lot of industry Parental Involvement/Parenting Skills/Family: • Family stability is key • Family is the most important institution • Lack of parenting / parental support • Parents need to reinforce values; help foster good choices • Children don't get proper framework • Challenges with single parent families • Lack of quality time with parents (parents working) • Lack of communication between parent and child • The `broken family' • Parents' lack of education creates challenges navigating the system Substance Abuse • Substance abuse and domestic violence at the core of a lot of issues • Parental substance abuse and youth substance abuse • Synthetic drug use • Two fold impact: o Behavior of parents o Access by the children 821 P a g c — I it d ( ,. i', ., 'a n y Ch11dfe 'n ' s Assessrn21? t �. � -`d3 Domestic Violence/Abuse / Neglect • Lots of children being charged with sex-related crimes o More than other counties in the circuit o Some have been victims of crime • Highest number of cases of abuse and neglect • Domestic violence, both children and parents • Parents reporting bullying as an issue What services, programs, and resources do you believe are lacking in the community? (informants were asked to note any specific sub-populations, e.g. age groups, geographies, race and ethnicity). Extracurricular Activities/After-school Activities • Lack of activities and social outlets • Areas of community are in need of more activities • Pay to play sports • Lack of youth sports organization • Not many activities for youth (12 -21 years) Transportation • Transportation is a major problem • Transportation to certain areas in community o Central Vero o Gifford and Fellsmere • Transportation within the schools; no late bus Unaware of Services • Need more awareness of services • Lack of effectives ways to communicate with families parents and children about programs and services • Good programs, people may not know about them Childcare/ Daycare • Quality child care and education is at the core of well-being • Access and availability of child care of 0-2 populations • Out of school care for working parents • Long wait lists (largely due to funding) • Not enough foster families Mental Health • Lack of access • Areas within the county for help, but very difficult to get an appointment • No early intervention or prevention services when problems are identified early • Children with anger, behavioral, social and emotional problems 83 12- LI What services, programs, and resources in the community are strong and/or beneficial, i.e. what's going well? Things that are going well— Positive(s) • Strong community support, "everyone wants to help!" • Boys and Girls Club • Gifford Youth Activity Center o Black Male Mentoring Program at Gifford Youth Activity Center • Youth Guidance Program o Good base of mentors • Florida Institute of Technology partnership • Police Explorer program • St. Vincent de Paul-food bank • Elementary afterschool program • Free and reduced lunch program • Early Learning Coalition • Life for Youth Ranch o Summer program • Operation Hope • Americorp • Big Brothers, Big Sisters • Substance Abuse Council • Civil citation o Alternative for law enforcement for first offenses and minor offenders • Roundtable o Community leaders concerned about youth • Child care o High quality providers; ongoing professional development • Restoration rehab on homes o Promotes community pride (Gifford) • Dental services o Connection between dental and general health • Physical screenings o Immunizations • Bridges out of Poverty • Cub Scout • Fellsmere Exchange Club o Program supporting youth growth and development 841Pradian Rj ,jCr C0 �, �i �_ , h � lc r2ri ' _, flss � ssm � nf 2014 0--6 - s Please offer suggestions for how to improve services and programs for children. Suggestions • Address transportation problems • Develop more effective ways increase awareness of programs and services • Low cost/ no cost programs/services are needed • Fund the existing programs; make them available to more kids • School district should collaborate with other organizations to bring programs to kids as an extension of their day • Focus more on the family unit and help parents o Improve parenting skills • Programs to help parents o Learn to read and with parenting skills • Better day care for single moms • Offer trauma-informed care/therapy • Have resources dispersed across the county so people don't have to travel so far • Introduce children to more `social' things; provide opportunities to interact • Develop a way to find/connect with the kids earlier so they bridge into the schools easier and we can develop relationships and trust over time Considerations • When things work well, leave them alone • The quality of services is as important as the number of services • There are a lot of services, but there isn't a lot of collaboration 85 Seven (7)focus groups with members of the community were conducted from August through October 2014. The dates, locations, times are in Table 105. The purpose of the focus groups was to glean insight from specific populations and sub-populations in the community who are considered underserved or otherwise vulnerable. These target populations included: certain geographic sectors within the county, parents, Spanish-speaking individuals, females, and underserved individuals and represented households/families. HCSEF enlisted the assistance of several agencies and individuals within the community to assist in recruiting focus group participants. Each focus group was led by a skilled facilitator, accompanied by a note-taker. Not including the introduction and overview, each group lasted approximately 60 minutes. Six (6)focus groups were conducted in English and one (1)was conducted in Spanish. A total of 98 individuals participated in the group, with between 9— 17 individuals per group. Refreshments were provided at each session and participants were incentivized to participate with $25 Walmart gift cards, which were distributed at the end of the session. Each participant completed a demographic questionnaire prior at the start of the focus group and an aggregation of this information is provided in Tables 106-113, below. The participants were asked a series of 9 pre-determined, open-ended questions. These questions can be referenced in Appendix B. The questions sought to gain insight, not only on individual's interaction and perception of the community's services related to children, but also on possible suggestions and ideas to enhance and improve what is currently available. All participants were informed at the beginning of the session that the session was being audiotaped. Participants were assured that names would not be attributed to the responses given, but rather the information would be presented in the aggregate through the identification of common themes and threads. Methodology Notes: • The geographical area known as the Gifford community was oversampled due to pre-existing knowledge that this community has a significant underserved population. • Participants in a number of the focus groups faced challenges filling out the demographic forms, which is believed to be due the their literacy level. HCSEF facilitators assisted participants, when it was recognized that help was needed, in completing the forms, often by reading the questions and recording the answer on the sheet based on the response. • The `no answer' categories are a catch all for those who preferred not to answer as well as those who left the field blank. It is hypothesized that many of the `no answers' are a result of challenges with literacy. 861Paa2 — Indian River C 0 u n s ,vss2ssrn2nt 2014 Table 107:Focus Group Locations,Dates,Times,and Number of Participants Location Date rime Number of Partidoants Gifford Youth Activity Center 8/21/14 5:30pm 14 RCMA (facilitated in Spanish) 8/27/14 5:30om 17 Treasure Coast Community Health Center 9/17/14 5:30pm 9 The Preserve at Oslo Apartments 10/23/14 5:30pm 12 Gifford Youth Activity Center 10/24/14 10:00am 14 Fellsmere Community Prayer&Worship 10/27/14 6:00om 15 20th Street,Vero Beach(Crossover Mission) 10/28/14 6:300m 17 FoCLis Groups - Pat-ticipaiit hitorttiatioii Table 108:Focus Groups-Zip Codes Zip Code #of PartScipants %of Participants 32946 1 1.0% 32948 27 27.6% 32958 4 4.1% 32960 9 9.2% 32962 19 19.4% 32963 1 1.0% 32966 3 3.1% 32967 30 30.6% 32968 1 1.0% 34946 1 1.0% 34950 1 1.0% 34996 1 1.0% Table 109:Focus Groups-Gender Gender #of,Pamcipants Female 69 Male 29 87 ( 2-F - fig Table 110:Focus Groups-Age Age #of Participants 0-19 3 20-44 52 45-64 32 65-84 11 85+ 0 Table 111:Focus Groups-Race Race #of Participants White 22 Black or African American 62 Asian 0 Alaskan Native/American Indian 0 Some other race 7 Two or more races 0 Table 112:Focus Groups-Ethnicity Ethnicity #of Participants Hispanic or Latino 27 Not Hispanic or Latino 60 Table 113: Focus Groups-Employment Do you work now? #of Participants Work 35 or more hours per week 37 Work less than 35 hours per week 14 Unemployed 14 Homemaker 3 Retired 6 Disabled 10 Other 5 88Indian Rivor County (; hilr' ren ' s 201 %i Table 114: Focus Groups-Primary Language What is your pdmary language? #of Part dpants Enqlish 82 Spanish 16 Creole 0 Other 0 Table 115:Focus Groups-Educational Attainment What is the highest grade or r in #.ofi Participants $6661 you have 6000060? Less than hiqh school 13 Hiqh school/GED 31 Some colleqe, no degree 23 Associate or Bachelor degree 18 Graduate deqree 15 Other 2 Focus Group - Results & Common Themes To facilitate the discussion within of the focus groups, participants were asked a series of nine primary questions about their perception of child well-being, their experiences and degree of satisfaction with the public system in the community related to children's services. In addition, some of the primary questions included sub-questions (See tool in Appendix B). Listed below are the primary themes, categorized, that emerged during of the seven focus groups. "What does children's well-being mean to you?" • "Whole" child • Basic needs o Food, shelter health and clothing • Education • Safe and nurturing environment o Safety in the community o Area that has emergency preparedness plan • Well taken care of o Healthy and clean • Health care o Immunizations, vision, and hearing o Prenatal care 89 • Health insurance • Physical activity • Socialization • Positive self-image/self-esteem • Receive proper education • Parental Support and Involvement o Proper emotional and physical support o Parents acknowledge responsibility o Children to know they are loved o Help children be successful in the environment they are in o Helping set goals • Spiritual well-being • Morals, values and respect "What services/programs/resources are most important in the community for the overall well-being of children?" • Education • Health care • Child care/daycare center • Familial and parental involvement • Support and guidance • Transportation • Out-of-school programs "What aspects of a community are most harmful to the well-being of children (in general)?" • Poor education • Dangerous/harmful environments • Poverty • Lack of awareness and linkage to services • Lack of transportation • Lack of accessible child care and daycare centers • Lack of out-of-school programs "What do you think are the biggest problems related to children's well-being in the Indian River community?" • Poverty • Lack of transportation • Lack of accessible child care and daycare centers • Lack of out-of-school programs • Lack of awareness and linkage to services 901Pa – ; ndiar Rivc—r C0 ;aniy Children ' , r ; ; _ 201 %'- "What are the barriers to accessing services for children you've experienced or know of others experiencing?" • Cultural/racial and language barriers o "We went to black schools and had black teachers they cared about us as students" o "Many of our students don't see anyone who looks like them; they don't have anyone they can relate to" o Accessing local services and only see 'white faces" o "People feel they are not good enough because they are in the black community" • Lack of transportation • Lack of accessible child care and daycare centers • Lack of out-of-school programs • Lack of income • Lack of awareness and linkage to services • Travel to and from sports activities o "1 know of a family with 3 young children who could not get help that they needed for them. Because the resources that they needed were so far and with no transportation, and heavy rain almost every day, they could not get where they needed to go." "What services/programs/resources do you believe are lacking in the community?" After-school Programming • There are not enough activities for the children o "Children need a place to gather instead of wandering the streets" o "When children don't have enough to do, they are going wild" o "Kids have too much spare time and get into trouble" • Need more, affordable and better before and afterschool programming o Need more recreational programs to keep kids busy o Need programs for young kids and teens that don't require a fee o Not enough structured or sports programs in the community o Need programming during school breaks and summer • Programming primarily offered in Sebastian or Vero Beach • Lack of programming in south County • Individuals may not want to go to programs on church grounds Education / Schools • Some children have to go to school far away from their communities because local schools have closed • There are waiting lists (especially for 3 year olds) • Pre-kindergarten lottery • Students don't "see anyone who looks like them" • Focus is on athletics and not on education Health Care • Health insurance too expensive o Employer insurance often high contributions and co-pays • Have to travel to (West) Palm Beach for speech therapy or specialty care • Long wait times with some providers 91 • Need to focus on prenatal care (include young men too) • Lack of programs to assist with pregnancy prevention • Need mental health services • Mental health stigma prevents some people from accessing services Other • Poverty o Seasonal employment o Lack of financial security o No middle class; residents either very wealthy and poor • Crime • Bullying in schools; children threatened • Gun violence and gangs in the park and in the community • Need collaboration amongst service providers • Need people to work together more • Lack of awareness and linkage to services Participants were asked about the strong/beneficial services/programs/resources in the community and explain positive experiences related to services and programs for children. Specific Organizations Programs & Services • Gifford Youth Activity Center • Boys& Girls Club • Feed the Lambs Enrichment Program • Feed the Lambs Electrical Training Program • Indian River Tae Kwon Do • Head Start • Early Steps • Daisy Hope Center • Harvest Food Bank • Community church on 25th • RCMA • Housing Authority • Food banks/food pantries • Treasure Coast Community Health • Habitat for Humanity • Faith-based Community& Churches o Grace Baptist Church o St. Helen's Church • Indian River County Health Department • 2-1-1 pamphlet/resources sheet • Sororities and fraternities • Mentorship and scholarship • Behavioral Clinic • Cross-over mission • Career Source 921 Page - I ndi3 :' 1 _ Uurl1 .v f IIdrFn ' S As P_ S5ri12i� 1_ ='. ,—V Participants also provided additional feedback and suggestions on how to improve and enhance the current system of care for children in Indian River County. Suggestions: • Transportation to and from programs • More programs to teach trades to teens • After-school programming and low or no cost sports • Pre-school focused programs like Head Start and Reading Readiness • Utilize social media to communicate with youth • Tutoring programs • Time extensions for day care and preschool (morning and evening) • More spots available for day care • More appreciation for teachers • Classes for mothers and fathers on parenting • Mentoring programs for parents • Mentoring programs for men • Literacy programs • Help navigating `the system • Opportunities to expose children to experiences outside the community 93 J _ 49 J y Prioritization of Needs The Health Council of Southeast Florida worked with the Indian River Children's Services Advisory County to identify individuals to serve on a cross-sectional team for the purposes of conducting this assessment. These individuals comprised the Indian River Children's Services Advisory Group (See Appendix C). The group had thirty-six (36) members. The Advisory Group was initially convened in June 2014, with the intent of having topical experts and key community stakeholders that would review and vet all of the quantitative and qualitative data contained in this assessment for the purpose of identifying the key issues or priorities as related to children's needs in Indian River County. These priorities would also serve as the foundation to the development of a comprehensive plan. The Indian River Children's Advisory Group met six times between June 2014 and December 2014. These meetings consisted of review and discussion related to the quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data consisted of demographic and socioeconomic indicators, including: child population, race/ethnicity, cost of living, homelessness, maternal and child health, oral health, mental health, substance abuse, education, graduation rates, child welfare, morbidity and mortality as well as data related to health resource availability and access including: health insurance coverage and the safety net in the community. After all data was presented and vetted, HCSEF staff presented a 'Trigger Report', which essentially recapped and highlighted pertinent points. At that point, participants provided their thoughts, ideas, and suggestions on the issues, needs, challenges, and barriers affecting children in Indian River County. The following list(in no ranked order) is the result of that sessions: • Marketing availability of services available to the community • Social media and other methods of promotion • Recreational and after school activities (free or affordable) • Mentoring and tutoring programs • Transportation (proximity to services) • Activities for the teen population • Pre-school and early childhood programs and school readiness • Mental health and early identification and supportive services for children ages 8-12 years old • Specific mentoring programs for males in need • Early age literacy focusing on 3 d grade students • Parental enrichment, spiritual and social classes • Community building (playgrounds) • Peer-to-peer support • Childcare Services • Substance abuse programs During the last session, attendees further discussed the issues as identified above and then participated in a multi-voting exercise through which they ranked (and ultimately prioritized)the list. 941Pa e -- Indian R County r, ;7iIdren ' s Assessment 201 The following six (6)focus areas were identified as the priorities (in ranked order): 1. Early childhood development 2. Build parent capacity and family stability 3. Out of school enrichment activity programs 4. Middle and high school programs that address risky behaviors 5. Mental health 6. Marketing of availability of services Important to note are the additional areas that were discussed considerably: • parent education • transportation • homelessness of children • basic needs • dental care • health • women's health • advocacy • poverty • family/parent income • job placement 95 Co11ClilSi011 Communities face the challenge of balancing the desire to provide access to quality health and human services with decreasing resources and increasing demand. This Children's Assessment will enhance the community's and stakeholder's understand of the characteristics, health status and the needs of the children in Indian River County. This will serve the community well in planning for services and in resource allocation towards improving the wellbeing of the county's children. 96 1 P n _ - n d i s r' R j / e C o u r C `! C 1 1 � S , rn e e l 1. 0 1 41 Glossary ECHOS°is an ongoing observational assessment system that takes place inside the classroom. Conducted by the teacher, students are observed during their ongoing daily activities, such as working, building, problem solving, and interacting with peers. This measure is based on national standards in seven domains: Language and Literacy, Mathematics, Social and Personal Skills, Science, Social Studies, Physical Development and Fitness, and Creative Arts. ECHOS° readiness is ranked in three different ways: Not Yet Demonstrating (ND), Emerging/Progressing (EP), and Demonstrating (D). To be considered ECHOS° ready, a student must be either EP or D.6 FAIR is a system of assessments designed to measure a student's progress, diagnose learning needs, set instructional goals, and monitor instructional progress. The FAIR-Kindergarten (FAIR-K) administered to all public and private kindergarten children, consists of a Broad Screen/Progress Monitoring Tool, which includes letter naming and phonemic awareness; and Broad Diagnostic Inventory, which includes a listening comprehension and a vocabulary task. The outcome of these two tasks helps determine a child's reading success. In order for a student to be considered FAIR ready, they must have a probability of reading success score of 67% or higher.' FCAT Scoring: Reading and math FCAT scores range from 1 to 5, with 1 meaning that the student demonstrates an inadequate level of success with the challenging content of Next Generation Sunshine State Standards and 5 meaning that the student demonstrates mastery of the most challenging content on the Next Generation Sunshine State StandardS.8 Students in 3rd grade must score a Reading score of 2 or higher in order to continue on to grade 4. Students in 10th grade must score a 3 or higher in order to be eligible for graduation. A score of 3 indicates a satisfactory performance on the test. FLKRS is a screening tool that uses the aforementioned subset of ECHOS°and the first two aforementioned measures of the FAIR-K. To be deemed ready, a student must score a proficient score on both ECHOS°and FAIR.9 Graduation Rate: Federal regulations require each state to calculate a four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate, which includes standard diplomas but excludes GEDs, both regular and adult, and special diplomas. The US Department of Education (USED) adopted this calculation method in an effort to develop uniform, accurate, and comparable graduation rates across all states. The USED required states to begin calculating the new graduation rate in 2010-11. This graduation rate is currently used in Florida's school accountability system in the high school grades calculation. This version replaces the National Governors Association (NGA) rate, which is no longer calculated, for high school grades accountability. Homelessness: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recognizes homelessness as: s h� tp, ,,r �mrn tlkr, tlki, _ .ulmin ,trrtiout M run_i.li ,�+ il. i;l � tl�lu „r� � irl�l:arnin hit�,_t�,.ndt tlkl, tl;r, _ i , tti � �t.tll,�ui_ irl�l�arnin�ixlfet� ��f a",* rs m �iiL�k�t�nl h�lf'� CIZ.n�f — -- 9 http://www.paimbeach.kl2.fl.us/agenda/Wednesday,%20Septembcr%2019,%202012%20School%20Board%20Meeting%209-19- 12/B9E13A6E-A2AA-44DA-B2C2-EC84A3C0860F.pdf 97 � 2 00 • People living in a publicly or privately operated shelter that provides temporary living arrangements; • Those persons whose primary nighttime residence is a public or private place that's not intended to be used as an accommodation for human beings. These may include: a car, parks, buildings that have been abandoned, train stations, or camping grounds; • A person who is exiting from an institution, where he or she lived for 90 days or less, but was homeless before entering the institution • A person who is fleeing due to issues with domestic violence; • A person who will lose their primary nighttime residence within 14 days, and has not found another residence, and the person lacks the resources to obtain permanent housing.10 • The State of Florida reports the number of students who are identified as homeless to the Florida Department of Education. Due to federal law, public schools in Florida use an expanded definition of homelessness in order to include children and youth who do not have a regular nighttime residence. This broader definition includes children who are: • Sharing the housing of other people due to loss of housing, economic issues, or the like; • Living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, and camping grounds, due to limited options of other housing; • Living in emergency transitional shelters; • Left in hospitals or are waiting to be placed in foster care; • Living in a public or private place that's not intended for use as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings; • Living in cars, parks, abandoned buildings, bus or train stations or who are living in substandard housing or the like; and • Migratory children living any of the aforementioned circumstances.11 10 http: uu«.drf_tjic.fl.t] [it o�1r_urI: 1i ,nc>,�10�� _'01_C(wnciIRcport.lult u http: ��c��.��cf.,tat�.(l.u�;��rv��rim> hnn��!c;,n�;;duc;'?UI ;CounciIRcport..dt 981 Pa .; a — Indian River County �'; Ssessment 2014 12 8 - '") I Appendices Appendix A Indian River Children's Assessment - Key Informant Interviews Name: Organization: Date: Time: What do you perceive are the key issues related to children's well-being? What do you think are the biggest problems related to children's well-being in the Indian River community? What services/programs/resources do you believe are lacking in the community? (Age groups, geographies, race/ethnicity) What services/programs/resources in the community are strong/beneficial (what's going well)? Please offer suggestions for how to improve services and programs for children. Other Comments: 99 izp-i oa Appendix B Indian River Children's Assessment Community Focus Group Questions 1. What does children's well-being mean to you? 2. What services/programs/resources are most important in the community for the overall well-being of children? 3. What aspects of a community are most harmful to the well-being of children (in general)? 4. What do you think are the biggest problems related to children's well-being in the Indian River community? 5. What are barriers to accessing services for children you've experienced or know of others experiencing? 6. What services/programs/resources do you believe are lacking in the community? ❑ Age groups ❑ Geographies El Race /Ethnicities 7. What services/programs/resources in the community are strong/beneficial? 8. Please explain positive experiences related to services and programs for children. 9. Please offer suggestions for how to improve services and programs for children 100 1 P a g e — (i c: ri l v P r COU it 0 Ch i l re n e s A s s p s i rn e n r _2 0 Appendix C Indian River Advisory Group Name Organization Maide Jesus Bautista Redlands Christian Migrant Association(RCMA) Bradley Bernauer Indian River County Tony Brown National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Dr. Robert Brugnoli Mental Health Association in Indian River County Kathie Cain Indian River County Healthy Start Ryan Capone Department of Children and Families Barbara Coulter Consultant to Kindergarten Readiness Collaborative Judith A.Cruz Treasure Coast Food Bank Leonard Edwards Economic Opportunities Council of Indian River County Amelia Graves Vero Beach City Council Nydia Guzman Redlands Christian Migrant Association(RCMA) Barbara Hammond Learning Alliance Miranda Hawker Florida Health Indian River County Christina Hayes School District of Indian River County Louise Hubbard Treasure Coast Homeless Services Council Jacki Jackson Early Learning Coalition of Indian River,Martin and Okeechobee Counties Kip Jacoby Morgan,Jacoby,Thum,Boyle,&Associates,P.A. Michael Kint United Way of Indian River County Deryl Loar Sheriffs Office of Indian River County Karen Malits School District of Indian River County Kim McCorrison School District of Indian River County Althea Mckenzie Parents Involved in Education Robert McPartlan Department of Children and Families Michelle Morns Sebastian Police Department John Morrissey Our Lady of Guadalupe Peter O'Bryan Board of County Commissioners Indian River County Julie Risedorf Needs Assessment Advisory Committee Bob Schlitt Jr. Needs Assessment Advisory Committee Cheri Sheffer Devereux Community Based Care of Okeechobee and the Treasure Coast Vickie Soule Treasure Coast Community Health Elizabeth Swann Kindergarten Readiness Collaborative Keith M.Touchberry Fellsmere Police Department Dr.Jacqueline Warrior Indian River County Juvenile Justice Council Hope Woodhouse Needs Assessment Advisory Committee Freddie Woolfork Gifford Youth Activity Center Ladell Young Sheriffs Office of Indian River County 101 11 � ' / � 2 For More Information Bradley Bernauer Human Services Director 4675 28th Ct Vero Beach, FL 32967 772-226-1422 Bradley.bernauer@flhealth.gov Hope Woodhouse Chairperson, Children's Services Advisory Group hope.woodhouse@gmail.com 772-205-5631 102 7 a g ? — i %I i s it P 1 `/ ( C O i1 (l i Y Cil I 16 r e it s i`t. s S p f in n 7 � 12F - / 3 F a &&.it. Prepared by: Health Council of Southeast Florida HCSEF Health Council of �! Southeast Florida 1031