The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9/5/1990' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 5:01 P.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1840 25th STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA County Commissioners Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman James E. Chandler, Administrator Richard N. Bird, Vice .Chairman Joseph A. Baird, OMB Director Margaret C. Bowman Charles Vitunac, County Attorney Gary C. Wheeler Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board Don C. Scurlock, Jr. 5:01 P.M. 1. Call to Order -TENTATIVE BUDGET 2. Pledge of Allegiance - Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman 3. Adoption of Procedure to conduct Hearings on Ad Valorem Taxing Districts S -E - P.. 0 .�,-- 990 ._ Recommend adoption of following procedures for each fund in agenda item 4: "A. Open Hearing B. Announce % increase in Millage over Rolled Back Rate necessary to fund the Budget, if any, and Specific Purposes for which Ad Valorem Tax Revenues are being increased C. Receive comments from the Public D. Consider any Proposed Amendments to Tentative Budget and Calculate Revised Tentative Millage Rate (if revised) 4. E. Adopt Tentative Millage Rate F. Adopt Tentative Budget G. Announce %, if any, by which Recomputed Tentative Millage Rate Exceeds the Rolled Back Rate" E �� Wednesday, September 5, 1990 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Special Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, September 5, 1990, at 5:01 o'clock P.M. Present were Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman; Margaret C. Bowman; Don C. Scurlock, Jr.; and Gary C. Wheeler. Absent was Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, Attorney to the Board of County Commis- sioners; Joseph Baird, OMB Director; and Virginia Hargreaves, Deputy Clerk. The Chairman called the meeting to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Chairman Eggert announced that this Special Meeting is for the purpose of adopting the Tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 1990/91. She advised that Administrator Chandler will review the budgets, announce increases, millages, etc. and the first action will be to adopt the procedure to conduct hearings on the Ad Valorem Taxing Districts, which is as follows: �nKEll pm L-171 SEP 05 19911 SEP 0, 51b bo av, "A. Open Hearing B. Announce % increase in Millage over Rolled Back Rate necessary `to fund the Budget, if any, and Specific Purposes for which Ad Valorem Tax Revenues are being increased C. Receive comments from the Public D. Consider any Proposed Amendments to Tentative Budget and Calculate Revised Tentative Millage Rate (if revised) E. Adopt Tentative Millage Rate F. Adopt Tentative Budget G. Announce %, if any, by which Recomputed Tentative Millage Rate Exceeds the Rolled Back Rate" ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, Commissioner Bird being absent, the Board unanimously (4-0) adopted the above procedures for conducting hearings on the Ad Valorem Taxing Districts for this meeting as well as for the Final Budget Hearing, The following are the proposed budgets for the Ad Valorem Taxing Districts for FY 1990/91: 2 W INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AD VALOREM TAXING AUTHORITIES PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FY 1990-91 ESTIMATED RECEIM AND BALANCES: State Sources Local Sources Ad Valorem Taxes Sub -Total ` ` Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) Net Transfers Cash Forward -October 1, 1990 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES APPROPRIATIONS: General Government Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation Economic Environment Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfund Transfers Fire Control TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward -September 30, 1991 TOTAL BUDGET 1990/91 Proposed MUIW 1990/91 Rollback Millage 1989/90 Millage GENERAL PURPOSE MUNICIPAL TRANSPOR- GENERAL SERVICE TATION FUND TAXING UNIT FUND SOUTH COUNTY LIBRARY FIRE BONDS DISTRICT 2,061,355 2,582,284 691,723 0 0 3,410,650 3,477,562 160,000 22,500 345,029 23,239,391 4,112,325 0 1,621,430 4,935,543 28,711,396 10,172,171 851,723 -1,643,930 5,280,572 (1,435,572) (508,609) (42,586) (82,197) (264,029) 27,275,824 9,663,562 809,137 1,561,733 5,016,543 5,775,689 0 5,604,414 0 0 5,265,000 2,550,000 1,829,853 142,161 11150,000 38,316,513 12,213,562 8,243,404 1,703,894 6,166,543 8,515,577 826,586 268,155 1,619,884 0 18,578,019 189,504 0 0 0 196,034 48,296 0 0 0 0 180,121 6,791,708 0 0 136,703 0 0 0 0 1,650,750 0 0 0 0 2,580,612 584,754 0 0 0 3,206,023 8,941,631 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,397,143 34,863,718 10,770,892 7,059,863 1,619,884 5,397,143 1,352,795 622,670 308,541 0 320,000 2,100,000 820,000 875,000 84,010 449,400 38,316,513 12,213,562 8,243,404 1,703,894 6,166,543 1 NORTH 'WEST .3594 MILLS COUNTY COUNTY .2906 MII.IS FIRE FIRE N/A DISTRICT DISTRICT TOTAL 0 0 5,335,362 66,000 2,000 7,483,741 580,246 70,565 34,559,500 646,246 72,565 47,378,603 (32,313) (3,628) (2,368,934) 613,933 68,937 45,009,669 0 0 11,380,103 420,000 4,000 11,361,014 1,033,933 72,937 67,750,786 0 0 11,230,202 0 0 18,767,523 0 0 244,330 0 0 6,971,829 0 0 136,703 0 0 1,650;750 0 0 3,165,366 0 0 12,147,654 843,394 64,500 6,305,037 843,394 64,500 60,619,394 110,539 0 2,714,545 80,000 8,437 4,416,847 1,033,933 72,937 67,750,786 5.1512 MILLS 1.6211 MILLS .3594 MILLS 1.6230 MIL IS 1.0000 MILLS .2906 MII.IS 5.0040 MILLS 1.8857 MILLS N/A 1.5382 MILLS .9505 MILLS .2797 MILLS SAWMILLS 1.9642 MILLS 3967 MILLS - 1.5803 MILLS 1.0000 MILLS .3169 MILLS 1 1 1 SEP 0 5 1990 wux Chairman Eggert announced that the first item to be reviewed is the aggregate millage and asked Administrator Chandler to proceed. 4 Administrator Chandler informed those present that this is the first of two public hearings to consider adoption of the proposed Budget for FY 90/91 which begins October 1st. We will go through each of the funds, and as we do, he will give a brief overview of that fund. As relates to those funds involving property taxes, there are certain points he needs to make in terms of the millage rate to be in accordance with the TRIM Notice, and they will be addressed as we get into each of the funds. Administrator Chandler stated that overall the proposed budget is 126.4 million and contained within that budget is an expense increase amounting to 7.30. In a budget of that size and diversity, there are any number of changes and increases or decreases within the individual budgets; so, .it will be impossible to delineate all those increases, etc. Generally within the total budget, the major increases are related primarily to new facilities coming on line this fiscal year, i.e., expansion of the Jail, the new Health Department, and two new Libraries, as well as South County Park. Also there are increases in operating expenses and personnel associated with those facilities. In addition there are the increases in law enforcement, funding and salary contingencies, and increases in health insurance. There are no changes in the user fees at this time other than related to golf. As to property taxes, the aggregate millage rate proposed is 7.3010, and that represents a 1% increase over the rollback rate. That aggregate millage rate is a combination of the proposed tax rates within each of the individual tax funds, and we will address these as we address each individual fund. Commissioner Scurlock noted that as he understands it, in terms of new money available to the county from the previous 4 year, we have had approximately 5% increase due to new construc- tion and 3.59% in assessed values. Administrator Chandler agreed that is correct. Of that total 8.5%, 5% is new construction, or properties coming on the roll for the first time, and those properties where there have been changes in assessments amount to a 3.5% increase countywise. That is how we arrive at the rollback rate, and the aggregate is 1% above rollback. Commissioner Scurlock clarified that some assessments have gone up more than others. In example, he has had a few phone calls from John's Island and The Moorings where in some cases the assessments went up significantly, and in those particular cases, they experienced a much higher increase than that 3.5%. Administrator Chandler further noted that if you live in the unincorporated area of the county and your property value did not change, as far as the county millage is concerned, you would, in effect, see a decrease. Commissioner Scurlock also wished to make it clear that the function of County government does not include the Hospital District, the School Board, the Mosquito Control Districts, the municipalities, etc.; all of which have separate taxing powers. We are only talking about the part of the taxes for which we are responsible. GENERAL FUND Administrator Chandler announced that the total proposed budget for the General Fund is $38,316,51. It is up 2.9 million, and the millage proposed is 5.1512, which rate represents a 2.9% increase above the rollback rate. There are any number of major items accounting for the -A ncrease, and this would include the new facilities that are coming on line this fiscal year, as he previously mentioned. Also included are the basic operating expenses and personnel for those facilities. Another significant 5 FOO Fr . S F P SEP 05 1990 item is an expense associated with providing wastewater treatment for Blue Cypress Lake Park. Also, 470 of the overall increase in the General Fund is related to law enforcement and its needs, and in addition, there are changes in our health insurance premiums for the coming year. Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing on the General Fund, and read aloud the following letter received from Jacqueline Goodman: August 17, 1990 County Comm. Chambers 1840 25th St. Vero Beach, F1.32960 Subject: 15 33 39 00004 0007 0001 4.0 Please consider this letter acknowledgement of your tax hearing. ct/s/4o, I own 2 and 1/2 VACANT lots in Citrus Gardens. I have received tax increases for the past 15 years. I purchased this property in 1974 from a deceased relatives estate. I object to the increase as it pertains to occupants and resident owners. I do not use grater, sewer lines nor do I drive on your streets. I do not use your police or fire departments, nor do I feel I should support your school system. I feel it is wrong to be charged the same tax as levied against a family/or person who occupies a residence/business. I trust the proper adjustment will be made so that I am not taxed unfairly. nk you, Jacque ine Goolran 1009 Ca vino Uel Valle Alameda, CA 94501 (415) 521-8231 Property located Citrus Gardens PBI 3 151 lots 14, 15, & 1/2 16 G for bk 502 pp727). 6 M The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to speak in regard to the General Fund. Ralph Simeone, 1760 Sand Dollar Way, wished to make a few remarks relating particularly to retired folks, most of whom have an income that either remains static or decreases. He quoted from an article in the PRESS JOURNAL in regard to people's income and expressed the fear that we will see the middle income group disappear. Mr. Simeone noted that politicians, bureaucrats, etc., get continuous increases, and he was also a bit stunned by the increases proposed for the County administrative staff which range from 42% down to 70, the average being a 12% increase. Mr. Simeone stated that inflation is running about 4/5% annually, and he cannot see why a 5/6% increase is not enough. He noted that the State of Florida has declared a temporary hiring moratorium, and most workers are fighting simply to keep their jobs rather than worry about getting an increase. Mr. Simeone contended that there are many ways to increase efficiency without raising salaries. He stressed that his tax increase over a period of 5 years amounts to over $1,200 and he cannot continue to take this. He urged the Board to go over the budget with a fine tooth comb. He noted that everyone knows about the Sheriff's Department and commended the Commission for working this out. He felt the Sheriff's Department should be made to realize it is a part of the county and that it is not an entity unto itself. Mr. Simeone supported Commissioner Wheeler's suggestion that a barracks type facility should be built for prisoners. He then brought up the increase in population and asked what this has meant in terms of the tax base. Commissioner Scurlock answered that this particular year 8.59% is the new money generated from new assessments and new construction, and as to whether growth funds itself, his answer is No. Mr. Simeone then talked about the Growth Management Act and suggested that the County tighten up their rules and regulations Wo 7 PQQk PAGEV7 all utilities, facilities, recreation, roads, etc. Lastly, he would suggest that just as the federal government collects payroll taxes through the banks, why cannot the counties have the banks who are now collecting escrowed real estate taxes turn that money over to the county each month and not just at the end of the year. That money rightfully belongs to the county, and Mr. Simeone believed that is a perfectly plausible way for the county to increase cash flow. He personally felt the interest earned on those escrowed funds is not legally the banks'. Commissioner Scurlock noted that Mr. Simeone mentioned water and sewer and advised that those are enterprise funds; they are not tax supported. He explained how the impact fees work and stressed that there is no subsidization of water, sewer or solid waste disposal. Development, however, does not always fund its share in other things. Chairman Eggert believed part of that now will be picked up in concurrency management. Commissioner Scurlock wished to thank Mr. Simeone for his comments. He noted that it is very infrequent that we have someone like Mr. Simeone who takes the time to come in and have some specific suggestions and positive comments. Administrator Chandler wished to clarify one point in regard to Mr. Simeone's comments on salaries. He stated that there is nothing in this budget reflecting any increase of 420 or anything of that magnitude. The funding for the annual adjustment is at a rate of 4.50, which is applicable to all employees. Mr. Simeone noted that he read that Attorney Vitunac's salary is going up $5,000, Asst. County Attorney O'Brien's is going up $14,000, and Traffic Engineer Michael Dudeck's is going up $8,000 or 250. Administrator Chandler explained that there are two mech- anisms for increases. The 4.5% is applicable to all employees, with the Firefighters excepted because we are in negotiation with 8 and make sure that new developers are paying their fair share for all utilities, facilities, recreation, roads, etc. Lastly, he would suggest that just as the federal government collects payroll taxes through the banks, why cannot the counties have the banks who are now collecting escrowed real estate taxes turn that money over to the county each month and not just at the end of the year. That money rightfully belongs to the county, and Mr. Simeone believed that is a perfectly plausible way for the county to increase cash flow. He personally felt the interest earned on those escrowed funds is not legally the banks'. Commissioner Scurlock noted that Mr. Simeone mentioned water and sewer and advised that those are enterprise funds; they are not tax supported. He explained how the impact fees work and stressed that there is no subsidization of water, sewer or solid waste disposal. Development, however, does not always fund its share in other things. Chairman Eggert believed part of that now will be picked up in concurrency management. Commissioner Scurlock wished to thank Mr. Simeone for his comments. He noted that it is very infrequent that we have someone like Mr. Simeone who takes the time to come in and have some specific suggestions and positive comments. Administrator Chandler wished to clarify one point in regard to Mr. Simeone's comments on salaries. He stated that there is nothing in this budget reflecting any increase of 420 or anything of that magnitude. The funding for the annual adjustment is at a rate of 4.50, which is applicable to all employees. Mr. Simeone noted that he read that Attorney Vitunac's salary is going up $5,000, Asst. County Attorney O'Brien's is going up $14,000, and Traffic Engineer Michael Dudeck's is going up $8,000 or 250. Administrator Chandler explained that there are two mech- anisms for increases. The 4.5% is applicable to all employees, with the Firefighters excepted because we are in negotiation with 8 them. The other mechanism is the pay progression plan. In doing a study, we found that we were one of the very few counties in the state that did not have a step progression plan; we were experiencing a turnover rate of about 300, which is extremely high; and our intent was to address that turnover rate. Mr. Simeone felt that percentages actually are just a word game, and discussion continued at length with Administrator Chandler explaining the grades and steps, longevity provisions, etc. Mr. Simeone understood then that the big raises he mentioned are actually an adjustment to get those people where they should be and this will straighten out in the ensuing years. George Ireland of 35th Street did not feel the reasons given are a satsfactory explanation for a $14,000 increase. Administrator Chandler clarified that it is a percent on that individual's base salary, and Attorney Vitunac explained that Mr. O'Brien stepped into a position of an Attorney I and he is an Attorney II. He actually got a $19,000 cut in pay when he came to work here; so, he did not get a $14,000 raise. Commissioner Scurlock believed that periodically we need to look at our administrative salaries because if you continue to get 50 of a larger number, it all gets askew. Mr. Ireland felt that $4,000 still looks like an outlandish increase and that expla.ins why his taxes went up 65% a year for the preceding 5 years. The Chairman determined that no one else wished to be heard and closed the public hearing on the General Fund. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, -.the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative millage rate of 5.1512, (2.90 over roll- back) for the General Fund for FY 1990/91. SEP 0 51990 ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $38,316,513 for the General Fund for FY 1990/91. GENERAL PURPOSE MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT Administrator Chandler stated that the total proposed budget for the General Purpose MSTU is $12.2 million, and it contains an expense increase of $982,000. The proposed millage rate is 1.6211, which represents a 14% decrease below the rollback rate. Essentially within this budget there are two changes that affect the overall expense level. These consist of $85,000 to restore the Disaster Relief Fund which we pulled down this year, and transfers of approximately $155,000 to the General Fund and Road 6 Bridge. Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing on the General Purpose MSTU and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative millage rate of 1.6211 for the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit for FY 1990/91. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $12,213,562 for the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit for FY 1990/91. 10 TRANSPORTATION FUND Administrator Chandler explained that the Transportation Fund budget essentially is comprised of Road & Bridge, Public Works, County Engineering and Traffic Engineering. It does not have a millage, but is indirectly funded by taxes to a certain extent through our General Fund as well as the GPMSTU. The total proposed budget is $8,243,404, and it contains an expense increase of $855,000 which essentially centers around two areas. One is the need to increase our maintenance, as well as replacement, of some of our bridges. It contains funding for an additional crew for bridge maintenance and replacement, and another area of increase is within our Traffic Engineering Department, which is related to the need for increased mainte- nance, repair and installation of traffic signals, markings and signs. We only consider the expense level since the Transporta- tion Fund is not funded by a direct millage allocation. Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing on the Transporta- tion Fund and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $8,243,404 for the Transportation Fund for FY 1990/91. LIBRARY BONDS Administrator Chandler announced that this is the proposed millage levy to fund our debt service on Library construction, and the proposed rate is..3594 mills. Voted debt service is not tied into a rollback rate. ` Commissioner Scurlock asked about the number of years left on the bond issue, which OMB Director Baird advised were 4, including the 90/91 .year. SEP 05 1990 Wo Commissioner Scurlock inquired if we have any ability to defease that faster. OMB Director Baird believed we,could look into it, but advised that we have call provisions where we would have to pay a premium, and Attorney Vitunac explained that while you can always defease, whether or not you can pay the bond issue off early depends on the call provision. Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing on the Library Bonds and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED .by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative millage rate of .3594 for the Library Bonds for FY 1990/91. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $1,703,894 for the Library Bonds for FY 1990/91. SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT Administrator Chandler advised that the proposed budget of $6.2 million contains an expense increase of approximately $231,000, and the proposed millage rate is 1.6230, which repre- sents an increase of 5.5% above rollback. The primary changes are funding for replacement of a pumper and a fire rescue boat, the addition of a fire inspector mid year, and a reserve for salary adjustments, which adjustments are still under negotiation. Commissioner Scurlock wished to know if there is anything relating to the revenue side in terms of charges for inspections, 12 and Administrator Chandler advised that we are in the process of looking at various user fees this year. Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing on the South County Fire District and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative millage rate of 1.6230 (5.50 over rollback) for the South County Fire District for FY 1990/91. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $6,166,543 for the South County Fire District for FY 1990/91. NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed budget is $1,033,933, and it contains an increase of approximately $111,773. The proposed millage rate is the cap of 1 mill, the same as the current year, and that represents a 5.2% increase over rollback. The most significant change within this overall budget is our effort to provide enhanced fire service in the north portions of our county in going to a full service depart- ment within that area. The budget provides for 3 additional firefighters at Station #70 to begin the fiscal year and also proposed is the addition mid year of full time personnel at Station 20. That would be a total of 9 additional persons. Commissioner Scurlock stressed that 1 mill will not support this District at the new level, and we are either talking about finding an additional funding source next year or we will be laying off men. This problem hopefully will be addressed in the referendum in March. SEP 0 5 1990 13 SEP 0 wo Ftp Administrator Chandler confirmed that the 1 mill cap is not realistic to provide the same standard of service as in the South County District. .' Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing on the North County Fire District and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative millage rate of 1.0000 (5.2% over rollback) for the North County Fire District for FY 1990/91. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $1,033,933 for the North County Fire District for FY 1990/91. .. WEST COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT Administrator Chandler announced that the total proposed budget is $72,937, and it contains an increase of $7,054. Since these services are provided by the North and South County Fire Districts, these funds will.be paying for that service. The proposed millage is .2906, or 3.90 over rollback, and the reason for the increase is to offset the cost of those services provided by the North and South County Districts. Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing on the West County Fire District and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There being none, she closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative millage rate of .2906 (3.90 over rollback) for the West County Fire District for FY 1990/91. 14 � � r ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $72,937 for the West County Fire District for FY 1990/91. NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSING DISTRICTS Chairman Eggert informed those present that we would now address the Non -Ad Valorem Assessing Districts, which include the Solid Waste Disposal District, the Vero Lake Estates M.S.T.U., and all the Street Lighting Districts, and she asked that the Board adopt the procedure to conduct the hearings on the Non -Ad Valorem Assessing Districts. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) adopted the following procedure to conduct hearings on the Non - Ad Valorem Assessments Districts: A. Announce 1990/91 proposed charge and total budget for each Non -Ad Valorem Assessment District B. Receive comments from the Public C. Consider any Proposed Amendments to Tentative Budget and Calculate Revised Charge D. Adopt Tentative Charge E. Adopt Tentative Budget" The following are the proposed budgets for the Non -Ad Valorem Assessing Districts:` 15 A 1 1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSING DISTRICTS PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FY 1990-91 ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: Federal Sources State Sources Local Sources Ad Valorem Taxes Non -Ad Valorem Assessments Sub -Total Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) Net Transfers Cash Forward -October 1, 1990 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES APPROPRIATIONS: General Government Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation Economic Environment Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfimd Transfers TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward -September 30, 1991 TOTAL BUDGET 1990/91 Proposed Charge 1989/90 Charge SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 0 0 1,318,418 0 3,750,912 5,069,330 (253.467) 4,815,863 0 1,114,283 5,930,146 0 0 4,524,720 0 0 0 0 0 4,524,720 155,426 1,250,000 5,930,146 $33.00 PER WASTE GENERATION UNIT $33.00 PER WASTE GENERATION UNIT VERO LAKES ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT 0 0 1,300 0 59,700 61,000 (3,050) 57,950 0 170,000 227,950 0 0 0 205,545 0 0 O 0 205,545 22,405 0 227,950 $15.00 PER PARCEL/ACRE $15.00 PER PARCEL/ACRE rw 0 V • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY STREET NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FY 1990-91 ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES• Non -Ad Valorem Assessment Local Sources Contributions Less S% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) Sub -Total Cash Forward -October 1, 1990 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES: Utilities Administmtion/Collection Advertising Maintenance TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward -September 30, 1991 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES 1990/91 Proposed Per Parcel/Acre Charge 1989/90 Per Parcel/Acre Charge N 1 1 1 VERO PORPOISE LAUREL TERRA VERO DCORA ROYAL ROSELAND GIFFORD LAURE.WOOD ROCKRIDGE HIGHLANDS POINT COURT LINDA SHORES PARK POINCIANA ROAD STREET STREET - STREET STREET. t. STREET. SINGLE STREET STREET STREET STREET STREET STREET LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHT LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT 39,096 5,808 1,935 40,100 1,320 0 1,030 4,780 .6,048 6,348 11,873 3,828 2,000 875 600 4,187 295 0 12 100 100. 500 360 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,790 0 0 0 0 0 0 (2,055) (335) (127) (2,215) (81) (190) (52) (244) (307) (343) (612) (192) 39,041 6,348 2,408 42,072 1,534 3,600 990 4,636 5,841 6,505 11,621 3,636 11,500 4,428 2,000 24,491 270 540 0 0 150 1,409 3,000 0 50,541 10,776 4,408 66,563 1,804 4,140 990 4,636 5,991 7,914 14,621 3,636 46,882 5,500 2,000 50,054 754 3,500 739 1,650 4,311 5,000 10,162 2,37S 2,559 73S 444 2,603 373 100 139 2,126 635 500 1,210 660 100 100 100 100 0 0 12 60 100 100 50 25 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49,541 6,335 - 2,744 52,757 1,127 3,600 890 3,836 5,046 5,600 11,422 3,060 1,000 600 300 2,000 125 0 100 300 443 158 0 150 0 3,841 1,364 11,806 S52 540 0 500 502 2,156 3,199 426 50,541 10,776 4,408 66,563 1,804 4,140 990 4,636 5,991 7,914 14,621 3,636 $12.00 $22.00 $5.00 $25.00 $30.00 N/A $33.00 N/A $28.00 $23.00 $31.U0 $6.00 $15.00 $23.00 $5.00 $25.00 $30.00 N/A $20.00 N/A $30.00 $23.00 $0.00 N/A 1 1 1 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed budget is $5.9 million, and it contains an overall increase of $640,000. There are no individual line items that stand out; probably most of the increase would be in the area of personnel with 3 addi- tional proposed at the Landfill and one additional for recycling, as well as some equipment increases and salary reserve. This budget is funded by our assessment of WGUs (Waste Generation Units), and there is no change in the rate of $33 per WGU for the next fiscal year. Commissioner Scurlock inquired about the impact caused by the lack of mandatory collection. Administrator Chandler advised that there is no fund provided for mandatory collection and no income. If a decision is made to go to mandatory collection, it would be reflected on 11 both the revenue and the expense side. Commissioner Scurlock believed one impact would be the expense of continuing to operate the convenience stations at a higher level and asked if any expense was included for that. Administrator Chandler advised that we still have the funding for those stations as we have the current year. Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing on the Solid Waste Disposal District and asked if anyone wished to be heard. George Ireland wished to know how the people we have put at the various areas for recycling fit into the budget. Administrator Chandler answered that they are provided both in the current year's budget and in next year's, and these increases are tied into the recycling efforts where we are man- dated to reduce the overall volume going into our Landfill by 30% by 1994. Those persons were provided to implement that effort, and there are no overall increases in that particular area for the next year. Mr. Ireland wished to have mandatory collection explained, and Administrator Chandler advised that under that concept, a 18 ® � r resident would not have the option of carrying their garbage to the various transfer stations. They actually could do so, but collection would be provided at their home. This concept was discussed several weeks ago but was not accepted by the Commission and we are now looking at other options. Mr. Ireland wished to know if the public can vote on mandatory collection and was informed there will be a public hearing on this before an ordinance can be adopted. Mr. Simeone asked if the $52.80 on the tax bill is just for operating the Landfill, and Administrator Chandler explained that is the disposal cost per single family home and went into detail as to how that charge is arrived at. Mr. Simeone did not feel that $52.80 is a fair charge for a couple in a single family home that does not generate that much garbage. He personally felt everything a family generates should be weighed. Commissioner Scurlock advised that Seattle has an experi- mental program based on weighing everything. We looked at that program and also the cost effectiveness of implementing it based on the fact that we have such a low tipping fee. He noted that in West Palm Beach their WGU rate is almost $200 a ton, and in Key West it is over $160 per ton. We have looked at the various alternate technologies and have found the cheapest way to go is what we are doing. Jerry Keen, 39 year county resident, felt that it is a shame that in the last 3 years he has had to deal with an unfair situation in regard to the commercial aspect of this Landfill. He stressed that he does not mind paying his. fair share, but he has come before the Appeals Board over the last two years and has pointed out the inadequacies and unfairness of the commercial rate. The square foot concept is not working, and it is time the Board considered changing it. Mr. Keen believed that you should be charged for what you actually put in the Landfill. He also felt the fact that the landlord gets the bill rather than the E P 0 51990 19®O [,AGE SEP 0 5 tenants is not fair, and he urged the Board to address these problems. It was determined that no one .Flse wished to speak, and Chairman Eggert closed the public hearing on the Solid Waste Disposal District. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative assessment of $33.00 per Waste Generation Unit for the Solid Waste Disposal District for FY 1990/91. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $5,930,146 for the Solid Waste Disposal District for FY 1990/91. VERO LAKE ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT Administrator Chandler announced that the total proposed budget is $227,950, an overall increase of $150,000. This MSTU was created a number of years ago to provide paving and drainage with the Vero Lake Estates area, and it is funded on a per parcel/acre basis. The current year's charge is $15.00 per Parcel/Acre and the same amount is proposed for the next fiscal year. In this coming budget year, we would anticipate paving 101st Avenue, which is approximately 1 mile, and we already have paved 87th Street, which was 1.7 miles. The Chairman opened the public hearing on Vero Lake Estates MSTU and asked if anyone wished to be heard. George Ireland informed the Board that this is where his taxes went up 65% per year. He is curious to know what they do with this money and approximately how many lots there are and how many home owners are assessed for this. 20 Administrator Chandler explained that the expenses are totally tied to paving and drainage projects, and the size of those projects depends on the amount of funds available. About 2 years ago, we paved 87th Street and we contemplate paving 101st Avenue, and he believed an overall drainage study has been completed recently. Commissioner Scurlock further explained that the original district was formed at the request of the Property Owners Association, and they came up with a basic concept and budget. At one point that group actually came before the Board and wanted to charge $100 a year per parcel/acre, but the Commission left it at the $15 level. OMB Director Baird advised that there are 3,980 lots in Vero Lake Estates, and if you own a piece of property that is less than an acre, you still pay $15. Mr. Ireland stated that he owns 10 acres that he had hoped to retire on some day, but there is nothing but a slough of mud on the street his house might go on. His taxes have gone from $100 to about $600, which is pretty astronomical because he has seen absolutely no improvement other than on 87th Street. Commissioner Scurlock wondered how much of the change is due to a change in Mr. Ireland's property assessment. He noted that Vero Lake Estates has posed a monumental problem to us for many years. It was platted way back when no thought was given to such things as drainage and roads. This is a very sizable area, and the Property Owners wanted to try to begin at least some improve- ments. There is no question that what has been paved is not really enough, nor has enough drainage been provided, but this is such a large area that it is practically impossible to raise the money needed to go in and do the job right. Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that the current zoning laws in the county would not allow this ever to happen again; you now have to put in the roads and the drainage, but when this came about, there was no zoning in the county. BOOK PAGE 21 uj- S E P 0 51990 Mr. Ireland stated that he doesn't mind that the roads aren't paved, but what he does dislike is that his taxes have gone up an average of 65% for 5 years and there is one road paved. He did agree that the appraised value of his property has gone up, but felt it reaches a point where there has to be a correlation between h.is taxes and what is happening. Administrator Chandler noted that unless Mr. Ireland's assessed value went up more than the average countywide, he should not experience an increase in the next year. He stressed that in this budget we are trying to stay as near as possible to the rollback rate, but contrary to public opinion, growth does not fund itself. Commissioner Scurlock believed that a large percentage of Mr. Ireland's increase was due to School taxes. Brenda Kraft, 8045 90th Avenue, informed the Board that she has an acre and about .06 more; so, they get charged for 2 acres. She advised that she has started a petition which will be coming to the Board next week because a lot of residents do not want this paving. She moved out to this area for the country setting and would like to keep it natural. The one road that was paved this year has turned into a speed lane, and they do not have adequate police protection, fire department service, or reliable ambulance service. They also have problems with construction dumping and with people using the area as a firing range. Ms. Kraft agreed that they do need drainage control and they do have a mosquito problem, and they need these other things much more than they need paved roads. Commissioner Scurlock advised that at their last meeting the Board approved $56,000 for aerial spraying for mosquitoes in this general area. Ms. Kraft further stressed that their road grading service has dropped off considerably, and she has called the Public Works Director about this. 22 It was determined that no one else wished to be heard, and the Chairman closed the public hearing on the Vero Lakes Estates RED ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative assessment of $15.00 per Parcel/Acre for the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit for FY 1990/91. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $227,950 for the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit for FY 1990/91. STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS It was announced that the Administrator would read aloud the per Parcel/Acre charge for each Street Lighting District and then the budgets for each, after which anyone who has a comment to make on a certain District may be heard. The Administrator read aloud the following: mux C�PAGE SEP 05 1990 23 r -I SEP 05 1990 it 9 1990/91 Proposed Per Parcel/Acre Chg. Gifford Street Lighting District $12.00 Laurelwood Street Lighting District $22.00 Rockridge Street Lighting District $ 5.00 Vero Highlands Street Lighting District $25.00 Porpoise Point Street Lighting District $30.00 Single Light District (Charged to Individuals) N/A Laurel Court Street Lighting District $33.00 Terra Linda Street Lighting District N/A Vero Shores Street Lighting District $28.00 Ixora Park Street Lighting District $23.00 Royal Poinciana Street Lighting District $31.00 Roseland Road Street Lighting District $ 6.00 In regard to Terra Linda Street Lighting District, it was explained that although they have a budget, the District was not created in time to get on the Tax Roil this year. Commissioner Scurlock asked if the question raised by Wellford Hardee regarding the Gifford Street Lighting District has been resolved and was informed that it has not been totally resolved but it has no impact on what we are doing tonight. Administrator Chandler explained that Mr. Hardee is legally within the District that was established in 1981. His question is whether his property is benefitting from that District. We are saying that there is a benefit, and that information was conveyed to him yesterday. Chairman Eggert then read aloud the budget for each Street Lighting District, as follows: 24 Gifford Street Lighting District Laurelwood Street Lighting District Rockridge Street Lighting District Vero Highlands Street Lighting District Porpoise Point Street Lighting District Single Light District Laurel Court Street Lighting District Terra Linda Street Lighting District Vero Shores Street Lighting District Ixora Park Street Lighting District Royal Poinciana Street Lighting District Roseland Road Street Lighting District Proposed Budget 1990/91 $50,541 10,776 4,408 66,563 1,804 4,140 990 4,636 5,991 7,914 14,621 3,636 Chairman Eggert asked if anyone present wished to be heard in regard to any of the Street Lighting Districts. There were none, and she thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved the tentative per Parcel/Acre charges for each Street Lighting District for FY 1990/91 as read aloud by the Administrator and as listed above. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget for each Street Lighting District for FY 1990/91 as read aloud by the Chairman and as listed above. ` 25 SEP 05 1990 ME " U 1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENTERPRISE AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FY 1990-91 REVENUES: User Fees Interest Income Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) Cash Forward -October 1, 1990 TOTAL REVENUES EXPENSES: Golf Course Maintenance Grove Maintenance Vehicle Maintenance Water/Sewer Combination Services Self Insurance Protective Services Transfers Reserves Cash Forward -September 30, 1991 TOTAL EXPENSES GOLF BUILDING WATER & SEWER COURSE DEPARTMENT UTILITIES 1,485,480 708,000 7,603,093 22,000 85,000 340,000 (75,374) (39,650) (397,155) 351,537 352,844 842,075 1,783,643 1,106,194 8,388,013 1,713,643 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,267,788 0 0 0 0 913,094 0 0 0 0 70,000 0 0 0 193,100 120,225 1,783,643 1,106,194 8,388,013 M a -Z-I _ m r+ M m -s N -+, m tv 0 D — z CD � v < 7 z _. to .-i M M Ol -s z -n (D D C r- :3 r+ 0 0_ ' (n U) M m -h 'O O -s O (� -n 0 m "< M C -� Q 1 v 0 0 1 0. tD to M .. r+ N O r+ M M r•+ M N FW R SELF UTILITIES CITRUS FLEET INSURANCE IMPACT FEE GROVE MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND 2,121,052 80,185 1,071,348 1,500,825 300,000 3,500 0 50,000 (121,052) (4,185) (53,567) (77,541) 0 6,007 0 286,723 2,300,000 85,507 1,017,781 1,760,007 0 0 0 0 0 79,500 0 0 0 0 1,017,781 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 809,564 • 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 950,443 2,300,000 6,007 0 0 2,300,000 85,507 1,017,781 1,760,007 M a -Z-I _ m r+ M m -s N -+, m tv 0 D — z CD � v < 7 z _. to .-i M M Ol -s z -n (D D C r- :3 r+ 0 0_ ' (n U) M m -h 'O O -s O (� -n 0 m "< M C -� Q 1 v 0 0 1 0. tD to M .. r+ N O r+ M M r•+ M N FW R GOLF COURSE Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed budget is $1.8 million, which reflects an overall increase of $228,000. There is no individual item causing this increase. We will be adding 2 full time persons and deleting 2 part time persons, and in order to maintain our level of service, we have proposed an increase in the fee structure relating to greens' fees and cart fees. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard in regard to the Golf Course budget. There were none, and she thereupon closed the public hearing on the Golf Course. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $1,783,643 for the Golf Course for FY 1990/91. BUILDING DEPARTMENT The Administrator announced that the total proposed budget is $1,106,194, which contains an overall expense increase of $169,142. This primarily can be attributed overall to one addi- tional Building Inspector, capital outlay, and salary adjustment. Commissioner Scurlock asked where the reserves show in this budget, and OMB Director Baird explained that we have increased Cash Forward by $106,957 on the expense side. The reserves do not appear here because this is an expense and revenue appropriation. Administrator Chandler stated that the reserves are now a little over one million dollars. We used some this current fiscal year for additional automation of our building permitting process, and we also are looking at this as a source at such time as we have a need for expansion or change in overall facilities. 27 E P 0 5 1990 ?,PPK Ol PA,I-E 197 SE? 0 5 1990 OMB Director Baird reported that the reserve is $1,179,852 as of the last check run. Commissioner Scurlock noted thpt money all has been escrowed and only can be spent for the Building%Department. He asked if our total number of inspections is staying about the same, and Administrator Chandler advised that although new construction has slowed considerably, our number of inspections and our activity is -increasing because repairs and alterations are increasing. The Chairman determined that no one wished to be heard regarding the Building Department budget and thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $1,106,194 for the Building Department for FY 1990/91. WATER & SEWER UTILITIES Administrator Chandler announced that the total proposed budget is $8,388,013, an increase of $2,522,893. We have several significant increases all primarily related to two things which are interrelated. Most notable is our system expansion in both water and sewer. On top of that it has been mandated by the DER that the wastewater plants be manned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All this translates into the need for 26 additional positions - 12 in sewer and 14 in water. Also, with the expan- sion of the systems, there naturally are increases in basic operating expenses. We do have a rate study under way, but with the budget as presented, the expense increase is funded by the increase in customer base and customer revenue. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and she thereupon closed the public hearing. 28 ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $8,388,013 for Water S Sewer Utilities for FY 1990/91. UTILITIES IMPACT FEE Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed budget is $2,300,000, an increase of $850,000, and this is related to income from the impact fees. Commissioner Scurlock believed there will be a significant need to look at the cash flow and possibly do some financing alternatives somewhere along the line in order to be able to continue to experience the type of growth we would like and also to accomplish what is mandated by the Comprehensive Plan. Director Baird advised that we currently do a cash analysis every month showing our commitments, and it is getting very tight. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and she thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $2,300,000 for the Utilities Impact Fee Fund for FY 1990/91. CITRUS GROVE Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed budget for this fund is $85,507; a $500 increase over the current year. Commissioner Scurlock asks where the profit from this grove goes, and Director Baird stated that it stays right in the fund itself. SEP 05 1990 29 30m PA -GL SEP 0 5 MU Commissioner Scurlock wished to know if the sod farm is included in this grove operation. Director Baird confirmed that jit is and felt that we probably need to rename this fund. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and she thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $85,507 for the Citrus Grove Fund for FY 1990/91. FLEET MANAGEMENT Administrator Chandler announced that the total proposed budget is $1,017,781, and it contains an overall increase of $60,546. This is due to a combination of increases - parts, fuel, salary contingencies, basic operating expenses. He noted that we will be looking closely at the operating expenses, fuel, etc., in all of our operations because of what has transpired in the Middle East. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and she thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $1,017,781 for Fleet Management for FY 1990/91. SELF INSURANCE TRUST FUND Administrator Chandler announced that the total proposed budget is $1,760,007, and it contains an overall increase of $236,799. This increase is comprised of a combination of any 30 number of factors, i.e., the increased value of the new facilities that will be coming on line; additional employees in the budget; and also provided in this fund is funding for an overall study for evaluation of our health insurance program. The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. Mr. Ireland wished to know just what the Self Insurance Trust Fund is, and Administrator Chandler explained that this is where our Worker's Comp, liability, and basically all that type of insurance is. This is the fund that covers our insurance expense, and the result of going self-insured has been that we have reduced our overall expense. Mr. Simeone asked if this is working out real well. Administrator Chandler confirmed that it is. He advised that we have tightened up some and adopted specific policies and procedures in regard to settling claims. Also, the safety program goes hand in hand with this. We had an individual come on board who really knows this field, and he believed this program is exceeding everyone's expectations. The Administrator further explained that health insurance is shown separately and its cost is now reflected in each of the individual budgets. We have got our Worker's Comp and liability insurance on a good solid basis, and he felt we need to take a good hard look at our health insurance. It was determined that no one else wished to be heard, and the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved a tentative budget of $1,760,007 for the Self Insurance Trust Fund for FY.1990/91. 0 ��®tK � FAGS SEP 0 5 1990 31 1 ' INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - OTHER OPERATING FUNDS PROPOSED FOR FY 1990-91 ROUTE 60 ROUTE 60 1985 REF. SEWER WATER SECTION 8 HOUSING SECONDARY SPECIAL LAW PARKS & DdPROV. ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RENTAL AUTHORITY ROADS CONST. ENFORCEMENT 911 DEVELOPMENT TOURIST BONDS BOND BOND ASSISTANCE FUND TRUST FUND FUND SURCHARGE FUND TAX BS'1'IMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: , Federal Sources 0 0 0 1,097,774 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Sources 1,398,890 0 0 0 14,521 841,253 0 0 0 0 Local,$ources 100,000 655,690 106,233 0 0 2,203,909 5,000 328,000 5,000 321,000 Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) (74,946) (32,784) (5,312) .(54,888) (726) (152,259) (250) (16,400) (250) (16,050) Transfers 0 0 0 0 67,551 0 0 0 0 0 Cash Forward -October 1, 1990 9,656 0 0 0 0 3,827,097 80,000 18,900 30,000 30,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES 1,433,600 622,906 100,921 1,042,886 81,346 6,720,000 84,750 330,500 34,750 334,950 APPROPRIATIONS: General Government 1,433,600 622,906 100,921 0 0 0 0 280,500 0 0 Public Safety 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Physical Environment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transportation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Economic Environment 0 0 0 0 81,346 0 0 0 0 0 Human Services 0 0 0 1,042,886 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culture/Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,750 216,968 Interfund Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 5,720,000 0 0 0 100,000 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 1,433,600 622,906 100,921 1,042,886 8546 5,720,000 0 280,500 4,750 316,968 Reserve for Contingencies 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 60,000 50,000 0 17,982 Cash Forward -September 30, 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,750 0 30,000 0 TOTAL BUDGET 1,433,600 622,906 100,921 1,042,886 81,346 6,720,000 84,750 330,500 34,750 334,950 -n O O 7 CQ fD r+ s M -s O O N M a a• C Q LQ fD r+ N -n O r+ O' fD O r+ (D 'S 0 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY - OTHER OPERATING FUNDS PROPOSED FOR FY 1990-91 ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES' Federal Sources State Sources Local Sources Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) Transfers Cash Forward October 1, 1990 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES w w APPROPRIATIONS: General Government Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation Economic Environment Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfund Transfers TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward September 30, 1991 TOTAL BUDGET POLICE TREE ENVIRONMENTAL COURT PETITION ROAD ACADEMY FINES CONTROL FACILITIES PAVING IMPROVEMENT FUND FIJND BOARD FUND FUND FEES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71,500 8,500 21,000 66,000 1,100,000 1,761,000 (3,575) (475) (11050) (3,300) (55,000) (88,050) 0 0 0 0 1,310,000 300,000 0 46,000 50,095 16,560 187,843 4,432,050 67,925 54,025 70,045 79,260 2,542,843 6,405,000 0 0 0 33,085 0 0 40,000 0 38,155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,542,843 5,205,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 40,000 25,000 38,155 339085 2,542,843 6,205,000 27,925 5,000 15,945 21,175 0 200,000 0 24,025 15,945 25,000 0 0 67,925 54,025 70,045 79,260 2,542,843 6,405,000 1'� SEP 0 5 1990 8M F'�i("E OMB Director Baird read aloud the proposed budgets for the Other Operating Funds, as follows: Other Operating Funds 1985 Ref. & Improv. Bonds Route 60 Sewer Assessment Bond Route 60 Water Assessment Bond Section 8 Rental Assistance Housing Authority Fund Secondary Roads Const. Trust Fund Special Law Enforcement Fund 911 Surcharge Parks Development Fund Tourist Tax Police Academy Fund Tree Fines Fund Environmental Control Board Court Facilities Fund Petition Paving Fund Road Improvement Fees Proposed Budget 1990/91 $1,433,600 622,906 100,921 1,042,886 81,346 6,720,000 84,750 330,500 34,750 334,950 67,925 54,025 70,045 79,260 2,542,843 6,405,000 Commissioner Scurlock wished to know how much is left on the Route 60 Water Assessment Bond, and OMB Director Baird advised that it is approximately $300,000. It has been paid down pretty well, and about 3 million of the Route 60 Sewer Assessment is left out of $5,160,000. Chairman Eggert commented on the Tree Fines being listed under Culture and Recreation, which she found an odd heading. OMB Director Baird advised that is how the state sets up its account system, but he can check on it. Commissioner Scurlock believed that the Tree Fines Fund has remained quite constant, and OMB Director Baird agreed it has stayed pretty much the same over the years. Presently the cash balance is $76,121. 34 The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard in regard to any of the Other Operating Funds. There were none, and she thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved tentative budgets for each of the Other Operating Funds for FY 1990/91 as read aloud by the OMB Director and as listed above. CAPITAL PROJECTS The following are the proposed budgets for Capital Projects for FY 1990/91: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FY 1990-91 GIFFORD INDIAN TREASURE NEW DISCRETIONARY ROAD RIVER BLVD. SHORES LIBRARY SALES IMPROVEMENT NORTH PARR CONSTRUCTION SURTAX EMWATBD RECEIPTS AND BALANCES* 4,508,820 Local Sources 0 0 , Q93,000 0 5,323,500 Less 5% per F. S. IN.01(2)(b) 0 0 (600) 0 (266,175) Transfers 350,000 5,460,000 100,000 0 0 Cash Forward -October 1, 1990 0 0 195.000 11995,000 2,630,875 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES 350,000 5,460,000 343,750 11995,000 7,688,200 APPROPRIATIONS: ' General Government 0 0 0 0 4,508,820 Public Safety 0 0 0 0 2,831,380 Pbysical Environment 0 0 0 0 0 Transportation 350,000 5,380,000 0 0 0 Culture/Recreation1,995,00 e/Recreation 0 0 313,750 0 0 Imerfimd Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 Reserve for Contingency 0 80,000 30,000 0 348,000 Cash Forward -September 30, 1991 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL BUDGET 350,000 5,460,000 343,750 119951000 7,688,200 OMB Director Baird read aloud the proposed budgets for the Capital Projects for FY 1990/91, as follows: 3 SEP 0 5 1990 5 No ,"� F�, �. r - SEP 0 5199b Capital Project Gifford Road Improvement Indian River Blvd. North Treasure Shores Park New Library Construction Discretionary Sales Surtax (14 Optional Sales Tax) Proposed Budget 1990/91 $ 350,000 5,460,000 343,750 1,995,000 7,688,200 Commissioner Scurlock inquired if the Sales Tax is coming in as anticipated. OMB Director Baird advised that it is right on target right now, but Administrator Chandler noted that we are watching that very closely because collections statewide are down quite a bit. Chairman Eggert commented that she believed we are going to reapply next year to get between 11 and 2 million for the Public Health Building. Chairman Eggert asked if anyone present wished to be heard regarding the Capital Projects. There were none, and she thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0) approved tentative budgets for each of the Capital Projects for FY 1990/91 as read aloud by the OMB Director and as listed above. Chairman Eggert announced that the Final Budget Hearing will be held in the Commission Chambers at 5:01 P.M. on Wednesday, September 12, 1990. 36 4 r There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 6:50 o'clock P.M. ATTEST: I SEP 05 1990 Chair