HomeMy WebLinkAbout9/18/1990BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1840 25TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Carolyn K.
Eggert, Chairman James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Richard N.
Bird,
Vice Chairman
Margaret C.
Bowman Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Don C. Scurlock,
Jr.
Gary C.. Wheeler
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 A. M.
1.
CALL TO ORDER
2.
INVOCATION -Rev. Charles Weaver
Asbury United Methodist Church -
3.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
4.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/ EMERGENCY ITEMS
a. Parks & Recreation Committee Report
5.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of Regular Meeting of August 14, 1990
6.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate
No. 1167, in the sum of $207.60 for Henry J. Fischer
B. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate
No. 270, in the sum of $72.29 for Henry J. Fischer
C. Received and placed -oh file in the Office of the
-
Clerk to the Board: Report of Convictions, Month
of August, 1990
D. Land Acquisition Advisory Committee appointments
.( memo dated' September 18, 1990 )
E. FACO Human Resource Development Policy Committee
( memo dated September 11, 1990 )
F. Report of Occupational License Taxes collected
.during the month of August, 1990
( memo dated September 4, 1990 )
G. Sea Oaks Development Inc.'s Request for Extension of
A Site Plan Approval
(memo dated August 27, 1990)
EP 1S8 1990- ��'���.. �3
SEP19199.0--
GOOK �.'� E e
6. CONSENT AGENDA CONTINUED
H. Edlund & Dritenbas Architects, P.A. Request
for Site Plan Extension on Behalf of Seald
Sweet Growers, Inc.
( memo dated August 31, 1990 )
i
I. John Tanase's Request for Extension of a Site
Plan Approval
( memo dated August 27, 1990 )
J. _ IRC Bid #90-96/North Beach Wells
(memo dated August 30, 1990)
. I
K. 1991 State Aid Application
( memo dated September 4, 1990)
L. Library Furnishings
( memo dated September 7, 1990 )
M. Anti -Drug Abuse Grant Contracts
( memo dated September 10, 1990 )
N. Release County Utility Liens and Placement'
of a County Lien in Rockridge
( memo dated September 11, 1990 )
O. C.O. #4, CCD#1 Indian River County Main Library
( memo dated September 10, 1990 )
P. Authorization to Issue C.O. #5 IRC Main Library
( memo dated September 10, 1990 )
(Additional information available for review)
Q. Fire 8 Burglar Alarm Maintenance and Monitor-
ing Contract
( memo dated August 28, 1990 )
R. I.R.C. Health Clinic C.O. #2
( memo dated September 12, 1990 )
7. CLERK TO THE BOARD
9:05 a. m. 8. A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
9:05 a. m. 8.
M
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Sewer Force Main System - Res. No. 3
U.S. 1 ( West) From 10th to 4th Streets
( memo dated September 10, 1990 )
2. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 100 -
GENERAL PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY; PROVIDING REPEAL;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER '101 -
GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION; PROVIDING
REPEAL; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 102 -
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETINGS AND PROCEDURES; PROVIDING
REPEAL; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER
103 - COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS; PROVIDING
REPEAL; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER
104 - PERSONNEL; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER
800 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING REPEAL;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
( memo dated Sept. 5, 1990 )
9. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
Salary Increase
( memo dated September 12, 1990 )
10. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
None
B. EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Approval of FY 90-91 EMS Grant Program for
Counties Application
( memo dated September 11, 1990 )
C. GENERAL SERVICES
None
D. LEISURE SERVICES
None
• BOOK
BOOK
E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
None
F. PERSONNEL
None
G. PUBLIC WORKS
Request for Extension of Grand Harbor - Golf 8
Grounds Maintenance Facility Lane Development
Permit
( memo dated August 31, 1990 )
H. UTILITIES
1. Grease Trap and Pollutant Interceptor
Ordinance
( memo dated August 31, 1990 )
2. Well Closure Agreement Between St. John's
River Water Management District 8 IRC
( memo dated August 28, 1990 )
3. Third -Year DER Recycling/ Education Grant
Application Authorized Representative
Signature
(additional information available for
review)
( memo dated September 4, 1990 )
4. Effluent Disposal Master Plan
( memo dated September 12, 1990 )
11. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
12. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. CHAIRMAN CAROLYN K. EGGERT
CTC Review Evaluation Committee Meeting
( memo dated September 10, 1990 )
B. VICE CHAIRMAN RICHARD N. BIRD
C. COMMISSIONER MARGARET C. BOWMAN
D. COMMISSIONER DON C. SCURLOCK, JR.
E. COMMISSIONER GARY C. WHEELER
r
13. SPECIAL DISTRICTS
A. SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
1. Approval of 6/26/90 minutes
2. Approval of 7/17/90 minutes
3. Approval of Contract for So. Co.
Fire
District to provide total fire pro-
tection for the North and West County
Fire Districts
( memo dated September 12, 1990 )
B. NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Approval of Contract for So. Co. Fire
District
to provide ' total fire protection for the
North
and West County Fire Districts
( memo dated September 12, 1990 )
C. WEST COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Approval of Contract for So. Co. Fire
District
to provide total fire protection for the
North
and West County Fire Districts
( memo dated Sept. 12, 1990 )
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY'DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THIS
MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS
MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL
BE BASED.
9
Tuesday, September 18, 1990
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Cham-
bers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday,
September 18, 1990, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Carolyn K.
Eggert, Chairman; Richard N. Bird, Vice Chairman; Margaret C.
Bowman; Don C. Scurlock, Jr., and Gary C. Wheeler. Also present
.were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac,
County Attorney; OMB Director Joe Baird; and Barbara Bonnah,
Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
Rev. Gerald Sweat of Asbury United Methodist Church gave the
invocation, and Commissioner Scurlock led the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
s
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Commissioner Bird requested the addition of a report on the
Parks & Recreation Committee.
ON MOTION by Commi.ssioner Scurlock, SECONDED.by
Commissioner Wheeler., -the Board unanimously added the
above item to today's Agenda.
APPROVAL -OF MINUTES
Chairman Eggert asked if there we.re any corrections or
additions to the Regular Meeting of August 14, 1990. There were
none.
SEP 18 1990
S E P 18 1990
BOOK 81 N�GE
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having ,left the room temporarily)
approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 8/14/90,
as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. 6 B. _Approval of Duplicate Tax Sate Certificates
ON MOTION by Commissio.ner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the -Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
approved Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate No. 1167, in
the sum of $207.60, and No. 270, in the sum of $72.29,
for Henry J. Fischer.
e
C. Report of Convictions
Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to
the Board:
Report of Convictions, Month of August, 1990
D. Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Appointments
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/18/90:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. VS.
DATE: September 18, 1990
SUBJECT: AMENDED Memorandum/Land Acquisition Advisory
Committee
I wish to submit the following list of names as candidates
to serve on the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC) for a
two-year term:
2
1.
Chairman -
Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
2.
Rep. of Vero Beach City Council -
Jay Smith
3.
Rep. of Sebastian City Council -
Robert McCollum
4.
Rep. of Fellsmere City Council -
George Mraz
5.
Rep. of Indian River Shores Town
Council -
Fritz Gierhart
6.
Rep. of Orchid Town Council -
Robt. H. Haines,IV
7.
Member of Indian River Land
Trust -
Steve Hawkins
8.
Member of Sierra Club Conser-
vation Committee -
Bud Kleckner
9.
Member of Pelican Island Aud-
ubon Society -
Richard.Baker
10.
Member of Board of Realtors -
Herndon F. Williams
11.
Member of Chamber of Commerce
or Council of 100 -
Talmage Rogers, Jr.
12.
Member of Taxpayers' Assoc. -
Robert Schoen
13.
Member of Civic Association -
John Orcutt
14.
Member of Agri. Interests -
John Morrison
I respectfully request that you approve the recommen-
dations as outlined above.
i
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0.
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
appointed the above members as recommended by
Commissioner Scurlock to the Land Acquisition Advisory
Committee.
3 BOOK f'raEr�ou
e
S E O 1 8 1990
BOOK� �'�'''I
PE = ale
r
E. FACo Human Resource Development Policy Committee S
Out -of -County Approval
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/11/90:
TO: Board of County DATE: September 11, 1990 FILE:
Commissioners
SUBJECT: FACo Human Resource
Development Policy
Committee
FROM: Gary C. wheeler- -REFERENCES:
I
County Commissioner
I
i
- I request approval of the Board of County Commissioners to
serve on the FACo Human Resource Development Policy Committee,
and approval of out -of -county travel for me to attend a
Policy meeting in Tampa, October 11, 1990.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
appointed Commissioner Wheeler to serve on the FACo
Human Resource Development Policy Committee and
approved out -of -county travel for him to attend policy
meeting in Tampa, October 11, 1990.
F. Occupational License Report
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/4/90:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector
SUBJECT: Occupational Licenses
DATE: September 4, 1990
Pursuant to Indian River County Ordiance No 86-59, please be
informed that $2100.65 was collected in occupational license taxes
during the month of August, 1990, representing the issuance of 163
licenses.
Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector
4
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
accepted the Occupational License Taxes Report for the
month of August, 1990.
G. Sea Oaks Development Inc.'s Request for Extension of a Site
Plan Approval
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 8/27/90:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
L
Al A
R er M. Keating AIC
Community Develop ent D73rector
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Dire cto
FROM: John W. McCoy ��
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 27, 1990
SUBJECT: SEA OAKS DEVELOPMENT INC.'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF A
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of September 18, 1990.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On August 22, 1989, the Technical Review Committee approved a minor
site plan application submitted by Sea Oaks Development, Inc.
Approval was given to revise a previous site plan to construct a
50,540 sq.'ft. condominium building at 8860 Sea Oaks Way North..
Due to marketing -and permitting constraints, Sea Oaks has been
unable to commence construction prior to the expiration of the
approved site plan. Since no construction was begun by August -22,
1990, the site plan approval will lapse unless otherwise extended
by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant did submit a
request for site plan extension prior to the August 22, 1990
expiration date. Therefore,•in accordance with by the site plan
ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners may act on this
request.
No regulations have changed between the date of the original
approval and the date of the extension request that would
significantly change the approved project design.
SEP 18 1990
I
SEP 18 1990 BOOK81
Pursuant to the provisions of site plan ordinance, Sea Oaks is
.requesting a full 1 year -extension of the approved site plan.' It
has been the policy of the Board to grant extensions to projects
which conform to current codes.
RECOMMENDATION:
•
Staff recommends approval of Sea Oaks request for a one year
extension of the approved -site plan; the new expiration date to
be -August 22, 1991.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler,. the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
granted a one-year extension of the approved site plan
as recommended by staff, and set the new expiration
date for August 22, 1991.
H. _Seald Sweet Growers, Inc. Request for Extension of Site Plan
Approval
O
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 8/31/90:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. eat g, P
Community Development. Director
THROUGH: Stan BolinJ',iAICP
Planning Director
FROM: Christopher D. Rison NP
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: August 31, 1990
SUBJECT: EDLUND AND DRITENBAS ARCHITECTS, P.A. REQUEST FOR SITE
PLAN EXTENSION ON BEHALF OF SEALD SWEET GROWERS, INC.
SP -MA -88-12-95
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of September 18, 1990.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On October 12, 1989, the Planning and Zoning Commission
conditionally approved a major site plan application submitted by
6
Edlund and Dritenbas Architects, P.A. on behalf of Seald Sweet
Growers, Inc. Approval was given to construct a 13,694 sq. ft.
office building at 7425 20th Street.
Edlund and Dritenbas Architects, P.A., on behalf of Seald Sweet
Growers, Inc., has requested that a site plan extension be granted.
Due to funding difficulties, Seald Sweet Growers, Inc. has been
unable to commence construction of the approved -site plan.
Furthermore, Seald Sweet Growers, Inc. is of the opinion that the
current site plan approval expiration date will pass before
construction can commence. If no construction has begun by October
12, 1990, the site plan approval will lapse unless otherwise
extended by the Board of County Commissioners.
No regulations have changed since the time of the site plan
approval that would significantly affect the project's design if
it were reviewed as a new application today. The members of the
Technical Review Committee (TRC) concur that the changes that have
occurred are not significant enough to require any site plan
revisions.
Pursuant to the provisions of the site plan ordinance, Seald Sweet
Growers, Inc. is requesting a full one (1) year extension of the
approved site plan. Pursuant to the site plan ordinance, the Board
may grant, or grant with additional conditions, such site plan
extensions. In staff's opinion, the current subject site plan
application would substantially conform to current requirements.
Staff recommends approval of Edlund and Dritenbas Architects,
P.A.'s request for a one (1) year extension of the conditionally
approved site plan: The new site plan expiration date will be
October 12, 1991.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
granted a one-year extension of the conditionally
approved site plan, as recommended by staff, and set
the new s.ite plan expiration date.as October 12, 1991.
Boy 81 F'K,EIJGII
S E P 18 1990
SEP 18 1990
BOOK 81 FAu ..�
I. John Tanase's Request for Extension of Site Plan Approval
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 8/27/90:
i
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
8obert M. Keat - g, P
Community Developme Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling; )ICP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoytent
Staff Planner Development
DATE: August 27, 1990
SUBJECT: JOHN TANASE'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF A SITE PLAN
APPROVAL
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of September 18, 1990
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
In 1989 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a major site
plan application submitted by John Tanase. Approval was given to
construct a 9,120 sq. ft. office building at 1205 South U.S.
Highway 1.
Due to financial constraints, Mr. Tanase has been unable to
commence construction prior to the expiration of the approved site
plan. Since no construction was begun by the expiration date, the
site plan approval will lapse unless otherwise extended by the
-- Board of County Commissioners. The applicant did submit a request
for site plan extension prior to the expiration date. Therefore,
in accordance with the site plan ordinance, it , the Board of County
Commissioners may act on this request.
Since the project has been approved.,a sewer force main has been
constructed along south U.S. #1, making sewer available to the
project. As a condition of the site plan extension, the utilities
department is requiring the applicant to connect to county sewer.
It should be noted that as part of his original site plan
application, the applicant acknowledged that he would be required
to hook up to sewer when it became available. The sewer connection
requirement is the only change that has occurred with the site
plan. The 'applicant agrees to the sewer connection requirement
(see attachment #4).
Pursuant to the provisions of the site plan ordinance, *John Tanase
is requesting a full 1 -year extension of the approved site plan.
It has been the policy of the Board to grant extensions to projects
which conform to current codes.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of John Tanase's request for a one year
extension of the approved site plan; the new expiration date to
be May 25, 1991, subject to the following condition:
1. that the applicant submit and obtain a utility construction
permit for the required connection to county sewer, prior to
site plan release and that the sewer connection be completed
and in service, prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy (C.O.) for the project.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
granted a one-year extension of the approved site plan,
as recommended by staff, and set the new expiration
date as May 25, 1991.
J. IRC Bid #90-96 -- North Beach Wells
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 8/30/90:
DAME: August 30, 1990
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administr for
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi
FROM: Dominick L. Mascola, CPO Manager
Division of Purchasing
SUW: IRC BID #90-96/North Beach Wells
On request frau the Utility Division, the bid for North Beach Wells
was properly advertised and Twenty (20) Invitations to Bid were sent
out. On August -1, 1990, Seven (7) vendors submitted proposals for the
carmodity.
ANALYSIS:
Staff has reviewed the submittal to ascertain adherence to specifications.
Diversified Drilling Corporation was the lowest bidder and met all re-
quirements.
FUNDING:
Monies for this project will cane frau Impact Fees, Work in Progress,
North Beach Wells. The funds available are $183,242.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Award of a Fixed Contract for $183,242.00 to
the lowest bidder, Diversified Drilling Corp. for the subject project,
and request to review the proposed Contract and authorize the chair-
person to execute the document.
R00K 81 PAruE.3
9
SEP 18 1990
_I
BOOK "a»' "7
FAGE•�
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
awarded IRC Bid 90-96 to Diversified Drilling
Corporation, as set out in the above staff
recommendation. -
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE .IN THE .OFFICE OF THE. -CLERK TO
THE BOARD
BOAXDOFCOUNTY COMMMSIONM
1R.0n—MSow Vem seach. FIN&& =90
j v
•.�..� iml r*aem 2 1 -
r
Recon ided Award * �LOR1D°' *
DIVERSIFIED DRILLING CORP
r
a..... T—=—Al
•'.183,242.00
Date- 8/1/90
PURCHASING DEPT. '
BID TABULATION
51161IIItted � PURCHASING MANAGER
Bid No.90/96 pate Of Opening 8/1190
Bid ittk IRC NORTE EEACS . FELLS COSSTRUTIO
1. DIVERSIFIED DRILLING CORP $183,242.00 4. AMERICAN DRILLING
$229,875.00 $238;560:00•
14811 N 12th STREET
1300 PINE RIDGE RD
TAMPA, FL 33687-0699
LUTS, FL 33549
FORT MYERS. FL 33908
2. CENTECR UTILITY CORP
208 600.00
2911 W. WASHINGTON ST
6109 ORIENT RD
ORLANDO. FL 32805
•'
TAMPA. FL 33610
iI
�
t
$235,000.00
3. Me GREGOR PUMP
$215,164.00
12900 INDUSTRIAL AVE TWO
PO.SOE 06377
PORT PIERCE, PL 34946
FT MYERS. FL 33906
K. 1991 Application for State Aid to Libraries
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/4/90:
DATE: 9/4/90
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: _ JAMES E.CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: H.T."SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SE JE
SUBJECT: 1991 STATE AID APPLICATIOqLI
FROM: MARY D. POWELL, DIRECTOIt�,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MAIN RARY
BACKGROUND:
State Aid to Libraries is an annual grant for county library
systems that meet qualifications spelled out in Florida
StatutesChapter 257. State Aid allocations are to
supplement county allocations for libraries.
ANALYSIS:
The Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners' signature
is required on both original applications in order to receive
State Aid for Fy 90/91.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff respectfully requests -that the Board authorize its
Chairman to sign the State Aid Applications and return to
the Main Library Director to be forwarded to the appropriate
State Library Staff. '
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
approved the State Aid to Libraries Application and
authorized the Chairman's signature, as recommended by
staff.
COPY OF APPLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO
THE BOARD
;L. Library Furnishings - Change Orders
r
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/7/90:
DATE: SEPTEMBER 71 1990
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTO
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
SUBJECT: LIBRARY FURNISHINGS
BACKGROUND:
On Tuesday, September 4, 1990 the Board of County Commissions awarded
Indian River County Bid Number 90-94 to the various vendors for
library furnishings at a total cost of $112,209.00.
= 1
EP 18 1990
BOOK U o
L
BOOR F'A�E ate'
The architect has recommended the following changes to the bid items:
Fabric
Back on Chairs
$1,655.40
Custom
Color Laminate on Desks
899.53
Custom
Color Formica on Folding Tables
246.00
Custom
Color for Microfilm Storage Cabinets
256.00
Fabric•Back
on Staff Chairs
160.00
Custom
Color for GF Furniture Systems
700.00
Custom
Color for Microfilm Storage
250.00
Custom
Color for Pedestal Storage System
162.00
TOTAL
$4,328.93
Being cognizance of budget restraints, these
items were not included
in the
original specifications. The bids
came in $64,574.91 below
the estimated amount, and these changes are
now being recommended.!
ANALYSIS:
The new negotiated total price including this change order, is
$108,479.29. This is a reduction in the original award by $3,729.79.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the change orders and the new total -
negotiated price of $108,479.21 for Bid Number 90-94.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
approved the change orders as set out in the above
staff recommendation.
CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD WHEN FULLY EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
12
M. Anti -Drug Abuse Grant Contracts
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/10/90:
TO: James E. Chandler ®ATE: September 10, 1990 FILE:
County Administrator
SUBJECT: ANTI-DRUG ABUSE
GRANT CONTRACTS
Randy Dowling
FROM: Asst. to County Administrato�EFERENCES:
BACKGROUND
The Board of County Commissioners, during its June 5, 1990 regular meeting,
approved the Substance Abuse Council's recommendations regarding the
projects to be funded with the state's Anti -Drug Abuse Grant and authorized
staff to proceed with the grant application. The grant application was
reviewed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs which requested
that formal contracts between the County and two of the service providers be
executed prior to final grant approval.
The five projects and their corresponding funding for FY 1990-91 are:
1) Substance Abuse Advisory Council Administrative Expenses - $16,000.
2) Indian River County Jail Substance Abuse Counseling Program - $510'695.
This program will be administered by New Horizons of the Treasure
Coast, I nc.
3) Intervention /Aftercare Program - $51,695.
This
program will
be
administered by New Horizons.
4) First Start Program - $28,688. This project will
be
administered by
the
Indian River County School Board.
-- 5) Just Say No Program - $23,263: This project
will
be administered
by
the Just Say. No Council of Indian River County,
Inc.
The -grant's total funding request is $171,341.* Of
the
total' request,
the.
state's 75% allocated share is $128,506 and the County's 25% matching share -is
$42,835. The County's matching share is budgeted
for
in the FY 1990-91
general fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board Chairman execute .-the three attached
contracts between the County and New Horizons and the Indian River County
School Board.
13 BOOK. E
BOOK -7
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having ,left the room temporarily)
the Board approved the following contracts between the
County and New Horizons and the Indian River County
School Board, as recommended by staff, and authorized
the Chairman's signature:
- Contract for_ Purchase -of Florida Fir.st Start
Services
- Agreement for IRC Jail Substance Abuse Counseling
Program Grant
- Agreement for Intervention/Aftercare Program Grant
CONTRACT AND AGREEMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO
THE BOARD
N. Release of County Utility Liens and Placement of a Count
Lien in Rockridge
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/11/90:
TO: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R�: Keller CLA County Attorney's 's Office
DATE: 1 1
September 0
p 199
RE: CONSENT AGENDA - BCC MEETING 9/18/90
RELEASE COUNTY UTILITY LIENS AND _
PLACEMENT OF A COUNTY LIEN IN ROCKRIDGE
1. ['have prepared the following two routine lien releases
and request that the Board authorize the Chairman to
execute them:
Release of Sewer Assessment Lien
ROCKRIDGE in the name of RATJEN
Release of Water Assessment Lien
SUMMERPLACE in the name of FLACH
14
2. 1 have also prepared a lien to be placed against a
property in connection with the Rockridge Sewer
Project. I request the Chairman authorize this lien on
behalf of the County by executing it. This lien.wili
permit an extended payment for the property owners on
the following property:
Rockridge Sewer Assessment - Glenn A. Strunk et ux
Further information for the above documents is on file in
the County Attorney's Office.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
authorized the Chairman to execute the above utility
liens, as recommended by staff.
LIEN DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO
THE BOARD
0. Change Order #4 -- IRC Main Library
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/10/90:
a.=�ae�eaa�000aoe�oa�====o=aoaa�e=oa.��=a.n�c�a���aaaas�a�aa=aa�a
TO: JAMES CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
FROM: LYNN WILLIAMS, SUPT. "Y
BUILDING AND GRA
DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1990
I -
SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER #4, CCD#1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MAIN LIBRARY
CONSENT AGENDA
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
i
The contract for construction of the Main Library between Indian
River County and Milne -Nichols, was approved by the Board of County
Commissioners at the regular meeting of December 12, 1989. Total
amount of the original -contract was $2,816,400.00.
P 18 1990' 15 BOOK � FAUL93 I(.,,
Change Orders #1-3 have previously been approved and issued for a
total change to the contract of $6,567.00 increase, with no time
extension. Adjusted contract amount of $2,822,967.00.
Attached is a memorandum circulated by Chairman Carolyn Eggeit,
polling the commission concerning the issuance of a Construction
Change Directive for changes 'in the Gift Shop area and funded 'by
Friends of the Library.
This amount exceeds the estimate of $8,500.00 provided in the
memorandum, but is*within the budgeted amount.
Concurrence was granted and Construction Change Directive #1, was
issued as a not to exceed directive in the amount of $9,578.00
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The issuance of Construction Change Directive allows the contractor
to begin work on the listed changes and to draw monies for
completed work.
Staff is requesting issuance of Change Order #4 for finalization of
the directive process. All parties have approved the Construction
Change Directive #1.
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING:
Staff recommends issuance of Change Order #4 in the amount of
$9,578.00 as stated in Construction Change Directive #1, with no
time extension.
Funding shall be from Friends of Library, proceeds of the Julian W.
Lowenstein bequest.
Adjusted contract amount will be $2,832,545.00.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
approved the issuance of Change Order #4 in the amount
of $9,578, as set out in the above staff
recommendation.
CHANGE ORDER #4 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO
THE BOARD
16
P, Authorization to Issue Change Order #5 - IRC Main Library
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/10/90:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaa=aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaa
TO: JAMES CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
THRU: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVItlo
FROM: LYNN WILLIAMS, SUPT.
BUILDING AND GROUNDS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1990
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE CHANGE ORDER #5 INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY MAIN LIBRARY
CONSENT AGENDA
aaaaaaaaaa=aaaaaaaaaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The contract for construction of the Main Library between Indian
River County and Milne -Nichols, was approved by the Board of County
Commissioners at the regular meeting of December 12, 1989. Total
amount of the original contract was $2,816,400.00.
Change Orders #1-3 have previously been approved and issued for a
total change to the contract of $6,567.00 increase, with no time
extension. Adjusted contract amount of $2,822,967.00.
Change Order #4 is the finalization of CCD #1 and will add
$9,578.00 to the contract amount. Adjusted contract amount
including Change Order #4 is $2,832.545.00
The following proposal requests have been forwarded by Dow, Howell,
Gilmore and reviewed by Proctor Construction for changes in the
work.
Proposal Bequest #7 -
Proposal Request #$ -
Amount.$1,722.00. This relates to
an owner initiated request for
column mounted shelves for the data
terminals within the book stack
area.. Furnishing suppliers could
not provide this item.
Construction Change Directive #1.
Proposal Request #9 - Amount --0--. This involves a
change, in the control of the
variable air volume bones and
Involves no money and no time
extension.
SES' 1 1990 1 7 BOOP b F, L� ��l
SEP 18 1990
Proposal Request #10 -
Proposal.Request #11 -
Proposal Request -#12 -
Proposal Request #13 -
Proposal Request #14 -
Proposal Request #15 -
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING:
BOOK 81 F,ArE. 375
Amount $474.00. This relates to an
owner initiated request for
enhancements to the building to be
funded through the Lowenstein
bequest. The change will add sound
insulation in the study room
ceilings and in -fill at the window
frames to reduce sound travel.
Amount -$560.00.. This relates to an
owner initiated request for
enhancements to the building to be
funded- through the Lowenstein
bequest This change wi1-1 improve
the stair well area from a
maintenance stand point by capping
the -wall with a laminate covered
cap.
Amount $3,145.00. This request
relates to additional wiring
required to provide local alarms on
the fire exit doors of the library.
No provisions for this work was
included in the plans and
specifications.
Amount $1,301.00. This relates to
an owner initiated request for
enhancements to the building to be
funded through the Lowenstein
bequest. The change will upgrade
the carpet in the Children's Reading
"pit" area.
Amount #3,202.00. This relates to
an owner initiated request for
enhancements to the building to be
funded through the Lowenstein
bequest. The change will upgrade
certain elements of the casework in
the Genealogy workroom space.
Amount $2,038.00. This relates to
an owner initiated request for
enhancements to the building to be
funded through the Lowenstein
bequest. The change will
incorporate the fabric wall covering
in the Genealogy workroom space for
improved acoustics.
Proposal Requests 10, 11, 13-15, are intended to enhance the
interior of the library and to be funded from the Lowenstein
bequest. Total $7,579.00.
Proposal Request #9 and #12, are for changes required to correct
Items now shown on the plans. Total $3,145.00.
Proposal Request #7, is intended to provide a method of placing the
data terminals within the stack areas for public use and is in lieu
of manufactured fixture. Total $1,722.00.
18
All Proposal Requests, have been reviewed and recommended by the
Architect, Construction Manager -and Project Manager.
Funding is recommended as follows:'
$ 7,579.00 - PR #10, 11, 13, 14, 15 Lowenstein bequest.
3,145.00 - PR #9, 12 Construction Contingencies.
1.722.00 - PR -
.#7 Furnishing Main Library
112,446.00 - Total
Staff recommends issuance of Change Order #5 with funding as stated
above.
Total change to contract $12,446.00, with no time extension.
Adjusted contract amount after Change Order #5 $2,844,991.00.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
authorized the issuance of Change Order #5 as set out
in the above staff recommendation.
CHANGE ORDER #5 WILL BE PLACED ON FILE 'IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD WHEN FULLY EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
Q. Fire and Burglar Alarm_ Maintenance and Monitoring Contract
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 8/28/90:
I
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
T11RU: JAMES E. ' CHANDLER _
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:. H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR
4
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVI S
SUBJECT: FIRE AND BURGLAR ALARM
MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING CONTRACT
BACKGROUND:
UA. Protective Services, Corporation presently has the contract for
the subject service in all County owned facilities. This contract is
scheduled to expire August 31, 1990.
i
- � r
i 19 BOOK . FI{ � i
S E P 18 1990
BOOK, UE.3 dj d
Staff has negotiated a two year contract for continuation of the
service, at the same rate, with an optional one year extension
provided there is no increase in cost and it is in the best interest
of the county.
ANALYSIS:
This is an "open-end" contract which will allow any additional
facilities to be added at the same price as per service. It !is
anticipated that the two new libraries and health building will 'be
Added at the appropriate. time. The contract does not cover
installation of equipment. -
FUNDING:
I
Annual cost is estimated at approximately $9,000.00 not including
maintenance which is billed at $35.00 per hour, plus parts. Monies
have been budgeted to cover the anticipated expenses.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the subject contract and request
authorization for the Board Chairman to execute the applicable
contract.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
approved the Fire and Burglar Maintenance and
Monitoring Contract, as recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD -
20
R. Change Order #2 - IRC Health Clinic
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/12/90:
DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1990
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SER
SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH CLINIC
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 2
BACKGROUND:
The following Proposal Requests are hereby submitted on the subject
project which will necessitate a change in the contract with Miorelli
Engineering and Indian River County.
P.R. 4 - Change floor coverings in certain areas to accommodate
traffic. Delete a window. Upgrade door type to meet fire
code. Cost of $1,311.00 and no additional time.
P.R. 5 - Change Reinforced Concrete Pipe size from 12" x 18" to 14"
x 23" to accommodate stormwater. Cost of $276.00 and no
additional time.
P.R. 6 - Add asphalt overlay of 501 for ditch cut on 27th Street as
required by City of Vero Beach. Cost of $1,690.00 and no
additional time.
P.R. 7 - Reduce size of balconys to accommodate oak trees on site.
Credit of $2,067.00 and no additional time.
P.R. 9 - Upgrade of certain doors to meet code. Was not required by
code and request was rejected. No money or time.
P.R. 10 - Extend telephone conduit to south property line. Part of
original contract and was rejected. No money or time.
P.R. 12 -.Install water pipe for replenishment to HVAC system. Cost
of $373.00 and no additional -time.
ANALYSIS:
Net effect on the original contract would be an increase of $1,583.00
or a total contract price of $2.432.333.00 and no additional -days.
Completion date remains at May 10, 1991.'
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends Board approval of the Proposal Requests as
submitted, and requests authorization for the Chairman to execute the
formal Change Order.
SE21
P 1 0
_I
BOOK
81 PAGE 3
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Bird having left the room temporarily)
authorized the Chairman to execute the formal change
- order as set out
in
the
above
staff
recommendation.
CHANGE ORDER .No, 2
is'
-ON
FILE
IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD
Commissioner Bird returned to the meeting at this point.
PUBLIC HEARING - SEWER FORCE MAIN SYSTEM - U.S.#1 (WEST) FROM
10TH TO 4TH STREETS - THIRD RESOLUTION
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
p
attached, to wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority'personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
g
.'fii' o^ NOTi� aY•�r41. pall....
Coimty Commisaloners of brdhml
The Board of
River County, Florida, hereby provides notice of
in the matter of
a Public Hearing scheduled for 9:06 Aon
Tuesday. September .M. 1a, 1990, to discuss a pro-
mment awe �ndiiaannn Cou ffa the W
stella n of sewers on the west side of U.S. 01
from loth to 4th Streets and providing for spe-
cial assessment liens to be made of record on
in the Court, was pub-
es to be serve
tine ProP�d
An one who may wish to appeal any dee�aion
may be made at this meeting will need to
_
lished in said newspaper in the issues of 9y®
which
ensure that a verbatim Mcmd of the proceed-
Ings is made, which Includes testimony and 0141Bence ypon which the appeal is basad.- " • -
August 31. Sept. 7. 1990 _ ,,,;f,.::i 717861
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in sajd Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun•
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the *aid newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day �19
(Business Manl;ger)
(C Cowl-MMian Rivbr-C6LM7, FT6rIdaj---
(SEAL)
22
r --
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/10/90:
DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1990
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
000
.FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR OF UTILIT SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F. McCAI
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJEC E
BY: DEPARTMENT OF RVICES
SUBJECT: SEWER FORCE MAIN SYSTEM - RESOLUTION NO. 3
U.S. 1 (WEST) FROM 10TH TO 4TH -STREETS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -88 -22 -CCS
BACKGROUND
On August 28, 1990, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved Resolution Nos. 1 and 2 for the assessment
project listed above. We now wish to have Resolution No. 3 approved
to set the preliminary assessment in place.
ANALYSIS
Letters notifying the property owners of their assessment, as well
as the date and time of the preliminary assessment hearing and
informational hearing, were mailed out on September 5, 1990. In
keeping with the project schedule, we are now bringing Resolution
No. 3 to the Board of County Commissioners for approval (see
attached resolution apd assessment roll).
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolution.
Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that this is the
project that was redesigned because of the difficulty in
acquiring the easements. Those easements are not an issue now as
,we are going out in.to the U.S. #1 right-of-way. He advised that
i
only one person attended the preliminary meeting, and that was
just for the purpose of asking for information. There were no
obj.ections. This project is one -that has been sought by most of
the people along that route.
Chairman Eggert requested that in the future a summary cost.
sheet be included in the Agenda backup material, and Director
i
Pinto advised that
cover.
i
SEP 18 199
the summary sheet was submitted under separate
23
ag'Ei'r" Fy;uC = fi t
BOCK
i
Chairman Eggert opened the Public.Hearing, and asked if
anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she
closed the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution:90=144, confirming the special assessments
in connection with a sewer force main system located on
the west side of U.S. #1 from 10th and 4th Streets and
providing for special assessment liens to be made of
i
record.
RESOLUTION NO. 90- 144
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CONFIRMING THE
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH A SEWER
FORCE MAIN SYSTEM, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
U.S. #1 FROM TENTH AND FOURTH STRE€ T 9 AND PRU-
VTUTRC-FDR-SPRAALITN5'T(T_13E MADE OF
RECORD. '
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County has, by Resolution No. 90-95., adopted August
28, 1990, determined to make special assessments against
certain properties to be serviced by a sewer force main
system of the County located on the WEST SIDE OF U.S. #1
FROM TENTH TO FOURTH STREETS; and
WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner In which
said special assessments shall be made and how said special
assessments are to be paid; and
(WHEREAS, the resolution was published a's required by
§11-52, Indian River County Code; and
.WHEREAS, an assessment roll in connection with said
special assessments has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County passed Resolution No. 90-96 on August 28, 1990,
which set a time and place for a public hearing at which the
owners of the properties to be assessed and other Interested
persons would have the chance to be heard as to any and all
complaints as to said project and said special assessments,
and for the Board to act as required by §11-53, Indian River
County Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public
hearing was published in the Press Journal Newspaper on
24
l
Friday,* August 31, 1990, and Friday, September 7, 1990,
(twice one week apart and the last being at least one week
prior to the hearing) as required by 411-52, Indian River
County Code: and
WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices
on September 5, 1990 (at least ten •days prior to the
hearing) as required by 411-52, Indian River County Code;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County on Tuesday, September 18, 1990, at 9:05 A.M.
conducted the public hearing with regard to the special
assessments;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
CONMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The special assessments shown on the attached
assessment roll are hereby confirmed and approved, and shall
remain legal; valid, and binding first liens against the
properties assessed until paid In full.
2. That the County will record the special assessments
and this resolution, which describes the properties assessed
and the amounts of the special assessments, on the public
records which shall constitute prima facie evidence of the
validity of the special assessments.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
_Sriir1ar_k and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
The Chairman-thereupon.declared the resolution duly
.passed and adopted this _18_ day of_•_SeRtPmhQr.• , 1990.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
By J���)
Attest __ar6g r -
Cha b an
�Te.- 8a on, C, -e
v y�J I 0 X
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE IN THE -OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD
SEP 18 1990 25
D00K 81 PMH jn(,
S E P 18 !990
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -88 -22 -CCS
SEWER FORCE MAIN SYSTEM
U.S. #1 WEST SIDE FROM 10TH STREET TO 4TH STREET
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
NET PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT: $ 97,125.00
sassr3azsaaaaaaaeaaaaaoaaa�assa • avaaaaQac�aa
PUBLIC HEARINGS - ORDINANCES ESTABLISHING CHAPTERS 100, 101, 102,
103, 104 AND 800 OF THE CODE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Deny
Vero Beach. Indian River Codnly. Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he Is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press•Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach In Indian River County. Florida: Ihat.lhe attached copy of advertisement, being
s /►
In the matter of ZZ/1 n
'rat M the Court, was pub -
fished In said newspaper In the Issues of
+�•
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal Is a newspaper published at
•a: Vero Beach, In sold Indian Rlver County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretolore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail molter at the post office in Vero Beach• in said Indian River Coun•
ty. Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and alfionl further says that he has neither paid not promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebels, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication In the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this_ +f^�A da 1, tg
. , & Business Marta er
�� n---• - - - - -ai to t
(SEAL) .' r
26
non
MICt
n
me
dor
Myons who may wish to appeal mly decision
whkh may be made N ads meet" will need to
@news that a vwbsem rams of tin prncominaa
IS made, which 4rchtdes testhnaly and evidsm7a
upon which"appeal Is based.
. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,.
BOARQ OF COUNTY COMAISSIONERS
CAROLYN K EOOERT. CNamMAN 4
Ayyuaty.lsse . T1SS77
PARCEL
PARCEL NO.
OWNER
SO.FT,
ASSESSMENT
12
33
39
00015
0000
00006.5.
LINDSEY
27878.0
$ 5,878.32
12
33
39
00015
0000
00007.6
MacMILLAN
16117.0
.1,398.41
12
33
39
00015
0000
00007.7
MacMILLAN
36590.0
7,715.33
12
33
39
00015
0000
00008.2
ANTHONY
27007.0
5,694.67
12
33
39
60015
0000
OOQ08.1
JOHNSON
24394.0
5,143.70
13
33
39
00000
1000
00038.0
HERRON
19166.0
4,041.33
13
33
39
00000
1000
00037.'0
SARACINO
20038.0
- 4,225.20
13
33
39
00000
1000
00036.1
BROWN/W012LEY
17424.0
3,674.00
13
33
39
00000
1000
00036.0
GIANNAMORE
2610.0
550.34
13
33
39
00000
1000
00036.2
FAT BOYS
3236.0
682.34
13
33
39
00000
1000
00035.0
GIANNAMORE
22651.0
4,776.16
13
33
39
00000
1000
00034.0
SMITH
18731.0
3,949.60
13
33
39
00000
1000
00033.0
SNAPP
30928.0
6,521.44
13
33
39
00000
1000
00029.0
V.B. CITRUS
107158.0
22,595.23
13
33
39
00000
1000
00015.0
NPC LEASING
40511.0
8,542.10
13
33
39
00000
1000
00018.0
FOWLER
19602.0
4,133.25
13
33
39
00000
1000
00019.0
CALIGIURI
13939.0
2,939.16
13
33
39
00000
1000
00036.3
BRACCIO
12636.0
2,664.42
NET PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT: $ 97,125.00
sassr3azsaaaaaaaeaaaaaoaaa�assa • avaaaaQac�aa
PUBLIC HEARINGS - ORDINANCES ESTABLISHING CHAPTERS 100, 101, 102,
103, 104 AND 800 OF THE CODE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Deny
Vero Beach. Indian River Codnly. Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he Is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press•Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach In Indian River County. Florida: Ihat.lhe attached copy of advertisement, being
s /►
In the matter of ZZ/1 n
'rat M the Court, was pub -
fished In said newspaper In the Issues of
+�•
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal Is a newspaper published at
•a: Vero Beach, In sold Indian Rlver County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretolore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail molter at the post office in Vero Beach• in said Indian River Coun•
ty. Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and alfionl further says that he has neither paid not promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebels, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication In the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this_ +f^�A da 1, tg
. , & Business Marta er
�� n---• - - - - -ai to t
(SEAL) .' r
26
non
MICt
n
me
dor
Myons who may wish to appeal mly decision
whkh may be made N ads meet" will need to
@news that a vwbsem rams of tin prncominaa
IS made, which 4rchtdes testhnaly and evidsm7a
upon which"appeal Is based.
. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,.
BOARQ OF COUNTY COMAISSIONERS
CAROLYN K EOOERT. CNamMAN 4
Ayyuaty.lsse . T1SS77
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/5/90:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. eat' , AI
Community Develo men irector
FROM: Sasan Rohani S'•2
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: September 5, 1990
SUBJECT: Adoption of Chapter 800, Comprehensive Plan chapter of
Indian River County, Code of Laws and Ordinances
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of September 18, 1990.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
On February 13, 1990, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners adopted the Indian River County Comprehensive Plan.
The adoption of the comprehensive plan was required by the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation
Act, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes. Besides mandating
adoption of a plan, the act also requires that within one year of
the required comprehensive plan submittal date land development
regulations consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan be
adopted or amended. Since the county's required submittal date was
September 1, 1989, the land development regulations are required
to be'adopted by September 1, 1990.
In rewriting the land development regulations, the Community
Development Department has coordinated with the County Attorney's
Office. The result of this coordination is a proposed reformat of
,the county's entire Code of Laws and Ordinances to a unified Code
Book. The Attorney's office is responsible for titles I through
VII, and the Community Development Department is responsible for
'title VIII (Comprehensive Plan), and title IX (Land Development
Regulations). -
;Attached to this agenda item. is a draft of Chapter 800,
Comprehensive Plan of the County Code of Laws and Ordinances. This
draft chapter has been reviewed in workshops and has been revised
to reflect workshop comments. as well as comments received from
'other county departments, interested individuals, and the Planning
;and Zoning Commission.
'On August 23, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7 to
0 to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that the land.
,development regulations including Chapter 800, Comprehensive Plan,
The approved.
!RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends that
:Chapter 800, Comprehensive
the Board of County Commissioners adopt
Plan.
27
SEP 18 1990
r
GOOK 8� h a��
�[,,AGE
i
Chairman Eggert read aloud the title on the proposed
ordinance for establishing Chapter 100 - General Provisions of
the Code of Indian River County.
Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing on Chapter 100 -
General Provisions of the Code,and asked if anyone wished to be;
heard in this matter. There being none, she closed the Public
Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 90-17, establishing Chapter 100 - General
i
Provisions of the Code of Indian River County;
providing repeal; providing severability; and providing
an effective date.
ORDINANCE 90-�
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 100 -
GENERAL PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY; PROVIDING REPEAL; PROVIDING
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, that:
SECTION 1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS OF THE CODE.
Chapter 100 - General Provision of Title I -
The Code, County Organization and Internal Procedures as set
forth in Attachment A to this ordinance is hereby adopted.
SECTION 2.
REPEAL.
Those portions of the Indian River County Code
(1974 edition) superseded or in conflict with the provisions
herein adopted, in particular Chapter 1, are hereby
repealed.
28
I
— SECTION 3.
SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or if any sentence, paragraph,
phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding
shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and it shall be construed to have been the legislative
Intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional,
Invalid or Inoperative part.
SECTION 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon
confirmation from Secretary of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 18
day of September 1990,
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach
Press -Journal on the 24 day of August 1990, for a
Public hearing to be held on the 18 day of September,
1990, at which time it was moved for adoption . by
Commissioner Scurlock seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye__
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
-Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Awe
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
BOARD.OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By—
aC roly K.'EggerYdChalrman
Attest By
J y K art n
P1 k V.
SEP 18 199® 2 9 <.�
r
SEP 18 1990 'JS7
BOOK�� fA.�E l �
ATTACHMENT "A"
TITLE
THE CODE, COUNTY ORGANIZATION, AND
INTERNAL PROCEDURES
-CHAPTER 100. GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 100.01. The Code.
§ 100.02. Construction of -Code; Definitions.
§ 100.03. Amendment•.or. Repeal of Ordinances.
§ 100404. Provisions Considered as Continuations of
Existing Ordinances.
§ 100.05. General Penalty; Continuing Violations.
§ 100.06. Appeals Generally.-
§ 100.07. Severability of Parts of Code.
Section 100.01 The Code
The following chapters and sections shall constitute "The
Code of Indian River County" and may be referred to as "the
code."
Section 100.02 Construction of Code, Definitions
In the construction of the code the following rules shall be
observed unless this construction would be inconsistent with
the clear intent:
1. General rule. The code is subject to the same rules of
construction as are Florida Statutes.
2. Board, Commission. The words "Board" or "Commission"
shall mean the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County unless some other board or commission
reference Is evident.
3. County. The word "County" shall mean Indian River
County.
4. County Officer. The words "County Officer" shall mean
the County Administrator, the County Attorney, or the.
Executive Aide to the Commission.
5. Computation of time. In computing any period of time
In the code the day of the act, event, or default from
which the designated period of time begins to run shall
not be included. The last. day of the period so
computed shall be included unless it is a Saturday,
Sunday, or legal holiday, in which case the period
shall run until the end of the next day which is not a
Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.
6. Legal time. Whenever particular hours are specified In
the code, the time applicable shall be official
standard time or daylight saving time, whichever is in use
in the county.
7. Representative of County Officer. or Department Head.
Whenever an action is required by this code to be taken
by a County Officer or Department Head, that action may,
also be taken by a duly authorized representative.
8. Gender. Terms of masculine gender shall embrace the
feminine and neuter gender as the case may require.
30
s
Section 100.03 Amendment or Repeal of Ordinances
1. The code when adopted by the Commission shall be the
best evidence of the current law of the county. It
shall be kept current by periodic supplements.
Supplements to the code shall be prima fac.le evidence
of the current law of the county; however, the
ordinances themselves shall be the best evidence until
the code is readopted.
2. All chapters,sections, subsections, or paragraphs to be
repealed should be specifically repealed by reference
to the chapter, section, subsection, or paragraph as
appropriate.
3. The repeal or amendment of an ordinance shall not
revive any ordinance in force before or at the time the
ordinance repealed or amended took effect.
Section 100.04
Provisions Considered as Continuing
nactments
Any provisions of this code which are the same or
substantially similar to the provisions of the former code
shall be considered as continuations thereof and not as new
enactments.
Section 100.05 General Penalty; Continuing Violations
1. Whenever in this code any act is prohibited or is made
or declared to be unlawful or an offense, or whenever
the doing of any act is required or the fa1lure to do
any act is declared to be unlawful, where no specific
penalty is provided, the violation of any such
provision -shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding
$500.00 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding six
months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each
day any violation of any provision of this code
continues shall constitute a separate offense.
2. In addition to the penalties provided by this section,
any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation
of any of the provisions of this.code shall be deemed a
public nuisance and may be abated by the county as
provided by law.
3. In addition, to the penalties provided by this section,
the administrative fines, penalties and liens provided
by Chapter. 162 may be imposed by the Code Enforcement
Board.
Section 100.06 Appeals Generally
Unless specific appeal procedures from rulings -of certain
employees, boards, or commissions are provided or prohibited
elsewhere, there shall be 'a. right to appeal as set forth
below by delivering to the person or body responsible for
hearing the appeal a written statement with facts and
details showing why the decision should be reversed or
modified, with a copy to the person or body from which the
appeal is being taken, within the time limits as follows:
1. From a decision of a Department Head. Any person
aggrieved by a final decision of a Department Head may
appeal to the County Administrator within ten working
days of the final decision. The County Administrator
shall respond within ten working days.
i
31
SEP 18 1990
BOOK 81 ['Au
2. From a decision of a. County Officer. Any personi
aggrieved by a final decision of a County Officer may;,
appeal to the Board of County Commissioners within ten!
working days of the final decision. The Board shall;
respond within 20 working days.
3. From a decision.of a Chapter 400 board or commission.
Any person aggrieved by a final decision of a board or
commission : may appea.i to the ' Board of County
Commissioners within twenty working days of the final
decision. The Board of County Commission.shaii respond
within twenty working days.
4. From a decision of the Board of County Commissioners.
There is no right of appeal from a final decision of
the Board of County Commissioners.
5. Failure on.the part of the appellant to comply with the'
procedures as set forth in Paragraphs (a) thru (d).
above shall constitute a waiver of the right to appeal.
Failure on the part of the .appellee to comply with
these same procedures shall be deemed a denial of the
appeal..
Section 100.07 Severability of Parts of Code
This code shall be severable, i.e, if any part is held to be
unconstitutional the remainder shall remain in fall force,
and effect.
Chairman Eggert read aloud the title of the proposed
ordinance for establishing Chapter 101 - Government Organization
of the Code of Indian River County.
Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing on Chapter 101,
and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There
being none, she closed the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted
.Ordinance 90-18, establishing Chapter 101, Government
Organization; providing repeal, providing
severability; and providing an effective date.
32
ORDINANCE 90-_L8
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 101 -
GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION; PROVIDING
REPEAL; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, that:
SECTION 1.
r..nV9PMUPMr nRrAM i 7e -r i MI
Chapter 101 - Government Organization of Title I
as set forth In Attachment A to this ordinance is hereby
adopted.
SECTION 2.
REPEAL.
Those portions of the Indian River'County Code
(1974 edition) superseded or in conflict with the provisions
herein adopted, in particular Chapter 1, are hereby
repealed.
SECTION 3.
SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or if any sentence, paragraph,
phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be unconstitutional, inoperative, or. void, such holding
shall 'not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and it shall be' construed to have been the legislative
intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional,
_invalid.or inoperative part.
SECTION 4.'
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon
co-nfirmation frnm thp$ecretary of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County., Florida, on this 18
day of September , 1990.
33 LRUGF �1�. rouf.d. "
SEP IS 1990Fr�uC 011
This ordinance was advertised In the Vero. Beach
Press -Journal on the 24 day, of August 1990, for a
public hearing to be held on the 18 day of pan Thor,
1990, at which time 1t was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Bird
_ seconded .by Commissioner
Scurlock
and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Carolyn K..Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Richard.N. Bird A
ye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman
Aye
Commissioner
YeCommissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Aye__
Commissioner Cary C. Wheeler A
Yp
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
aro I R Egger airman
ATTACHMENT "A"
CHAPTER 101. GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION
§ 101.01. Composition of Board of County Commissioners.
§ 101.02. Chairman and Vice Chairman.
§ 101.03. County Officers.
§ 101.04. County Officers, Compensation, Vacancy.
§ 101.05. The County Administrator.
§ 101.06. The County Attorney.
§ 101.07. The Executive Aide to the Commission.
§ 101.08. Board - Employee Relationships.
Section 101.01 Composition of Board of County
ommissioners
There shall be a Board of County Commissioners consisting of
five members elected at large by the electors of the County
pursuant to state law.
Section 101.02 Chairman and Vice Chairman
1. Election. Annually at the first meeting in January,
the Board shall select from its members a Chairman and
a Vice Chairman.
34
2. Duties. The Chairman shall preside at meetings of the
Commission and shall be recognized as head of the
county government for service of process, ceremonial
matters, and execution of contracts, deeds, and other
documents. The Chairman shall have no administrative
duties other than those necessary to accomplish these
duties and any others as may be required by Florida
law.
3. Absences. The Vice Chairman shall act as Chairman
during the absence or disability of the Chairman. In
the absence of the Chairman and Vice Chairman, the
remaining commissioners shall select a Chairman pro
tempore.
Section 101.03 Count Officers
The Board shall employ a County Administrator, a County
Attorney, and an Executive Aide to the Commission. These
County Officers shall report directly to the Board.
Section 101.04 County Officers; Compensation; Vacancy,
Removal
1. Compensation. The compensation and other details
of employment may be agreed to by contract between the Board
and the County Officers.
2. Vacancy. A vacancy shall be considered to exist If a
County Officer resigns, is removed from office, or is
unable to continue in office by reason of death,
Illness, or other cause. The Board shall declare when
a vacancy exists.
3. Removal. A County officer may be removed by the
Commission pursuant to the removal provisions of the
contract of hire or if there is no contract or removal
provision in the contract then the County Officer.may
be. removed by the Commission with a minimum of sixty
(60) days notice or immediately with a minimum of sixty
(60) days severance pay.
Section 101.05. The County Administrator
1. The County Administrator shall be qualified by
education, professional public service, and
administrative and managerial ability. The
Administrator shall be responsible for the
j administration of all departments 'of the County except
Constitutional Officers and their employees, the County
Attorney and staff, and the Executive Aide and staff.
The Administrator shall also be responsible -for the
proper administration of all affairs under the
jurisdiction of the County. The administrator's
authority and duty shall include, but not be limited
to, the following powers and duties for areas under his
jurisdiction:
a. Formulate and initiate overall policies for
presentation to the Board of County Commissioners.
b. Administer and carry out the directives and
policies of the Board and enforce all orders,
resolutions, ordinances, and regulations of the
Board in a fair, nondiscriminatory manner.
pit. o,
35
EP' 1 8 1990
IS E P • 1 8 1990 BOOK FACUE
` f
i
c. Provide the Board, upon request, with data or
information concerning County government and to
provide advice and recommendations on County
government to.the Board.
d. Supervise the care and custody- of all County
property..
e. Develop` and implement a position classification
and pay plan for all positions in County service. f
f. Develop, install, administer, and maintain
personnel and purchasing procedures.
1
g. Organize the work of County departments and
determine the organization of some.
h. Select, employ, and supervise all personnel and
fill all vacancies or positions.
1. Suspend, discharge, or remove any employee subject
to applicable personnel rules.
j. Negotiate leases, contracts, and other agreements,'
• including consultant services, for the County.
subject to the approval of the Board and make
recommendations concerning the nature and location
of County improvements.
k. See that all terms and conditions and all leases,
contracts, and agreements are performed and notify
the Board of any noted violation 'thereof.
I. Attend meetings of the Board with authority to
participate in the discussions of any matter.
M. Establish County and employee' incentive functions
and to expend County funds for such purposes.
This authorization shall include the right to
spend money for employee awards, payments of the
cost of employee functions, incentive programs,
cash awards for incentive programs, supplying of
materials, supplies, uniforms for County athletic
teams, sick leave bonuses, retirement dinners or
awards, and longevity awards.
n. Prepare and submit to the Commission the annual
county budget and capital program which shall
include in separate sections the budget prepared
and presented by the elected County officers for
the annual operations and capital programs of
their offices. The Administrator shall execute
that part of the budget placed in the
Administrator's charge in accordance with
appropriations and ordinances adopted by the
Commission.
o. Regularly examine the accounts, records, and
operations of every county department, office or
agency under his direction. The Administrator
shall make regular monthly reports to the
36
M
M
- M M
Commission on county affairs, keep the Commission
fully advised of the financial condition of the
County, and make recommendations on county affairs
as the Administrator deems desirable.
p. Represent the County and Its. interests with other
units and levels of government.
q. Perform any other duties as may be required by the
Board.
r. Prepare the agenda for regular or special meetings
of the Commission and any workshop sessions.
s. By letter filed with the Commission, designate a
qualified county administrative officer or county
employee to exercise the powers and perform the
duties of the Administrator during the
Administrator's temporary absence or disability.
Notwithstanding such designation, the Commission
may by resolution designate a . qualified person
to perform the duties of the Administrator during
the absence, disability or suspension of the
Administrator or during any vacancy in the office
of Administration.
t. It is the intent of the Commission to delegate no
governmental power of the Board of County
Commissioners as the governing body of the County
pursuant to Section 1(e), Article VIII of the
State Constitution.
Section 101.06
The County Attorney
The County Attorney shall be a member of the Florida Bar and
shall be the legal adviser to the Commission, the other
Board Officers, boards, and departments. The County
Attorney shall be responsible for the administration of the
County Attorney's Office and staff and when necessary shall
hire, promote, demote, suspend, or dismiss any employee in
the office of the County Attorney in accordance with the
personnel rules of the County. The County Attorney or an
assistant county attorney shall attend all County Commission
meetings and render such professional- services as may be
required by the Commission or the laws of the State of
Florida. The County Attorney shall prepare an annual budget
for the operation of the office and_shall submit this budget
to the Administrator for Inclusion in the annual County
budget.
- Section 101.07
The Executive Aide to the Commission
The Executive -Aide to the Comrnission shall be an individual
of great integrity and shall be proficient in modern
secretarial and administrative technologies and be able .to
deal effectively with the general public. The Executive
Aide to the Commission shall be responsible for the
administration of the office and staff and when necessary
shall promote, suspend, demote or dismiss any
employee in the office of the Executive Aide to the
Commission in accordance with the personnel rules of- the
county. The Executive Aide shall aid the Commission and its
individual members on a day to day basis in conducting the,
business of the Commission. The Executive Aide to the
a Y�L
37 ROOK Ft+.�JC9c�`3t
S E P 18 1990
BOOK FAGE
I
Commission shall have such other duties as the Commission'
may designate. The Executive Aide to the Commission shall
prepare an annual budget for the operation of the office and;
shall submit this budget to the Administrator for inclusion
in the annual county budget.
• f
Section 101.08 Board - Employee Relationship
Except as provided -in Section 1 01 .03 ne.i ther the Board nor
any of its members shall in any manner dictate the;
appointment or removal,of any County employee nor shall thei
Board or any of its mmbers give orders or directions to any'
County employee. The Board or its members shall proceed on
all matters throughthe appropriate County officer. Nothing,
In this section shall preclude a Board member from]
communicating with a County employee for the purpose of
Inquiry or. information.
Chairman Eggert read aloud the title for the proposed
ordinance establishing Chapter 102 - Board of County
Commissioners Meetings and Procedures.
Chairman Eggert had a couple of changes on this chapter.
Under Item #4 on Attachment A where it talks about Agenda matters
having to be in by Wednesday noon, she would like to add that the
Agenda packet has to be received by the County Commission on or
before Friday noon.
Commissioner Bird noted that the first complete sentence in
Item #4 is worded rather awkwardly and suggested that "to the
Commission" be deleted.
Attorney Vitunac suggested the wording on Agenda matters
being in by Wednesday noon be "shall be" rather than "has to be"
so as to allow a little flexibility because otherwise it is an
absolute prohibition, but Chairman Eggert felt that it should be
an absolute prohibition except in cases of emergency.
Commissioner Scurlock concurred about not adding any items
unless it is an absolute emergency since an item probably would
not be delayed more than one week.
38
® M M
Chairman Eggert also suggested a change under Item #8 in
Section 102.04. She felt Item #3 should read "Constitutional
Officers and Governmental Agencies", instead of "Clerk to the
Board".
Chairman Eggert also wished to change the language in Item
#1 under Section 102.07 - Addressing the Commission. 'She
suggested that it be changed to read: "The County Officers shall
have the right to take part in discussion, upon recognition by
the presiding officer, at any time, but may not vote."
The Commission indicated their agreement on the changes as
discussed.
Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing on Chapter 102,
and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There
being none, she closed the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board adopted Ordinance
90-19, establishing Chapter 102 - Board of County
Commissioners Meetings and Procedures; providing
repeal; providing severability; and providing an
effective date ; as amended.
3 9BOOK 81 Pb.�E J9-
SEP � � 1990 .
ORDINANCE 90-1q
BOOKPf�GE..0-
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ESTABLISHING, CHAPTER 102 -
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETINGS
AND PROCEDURES; PROVIDING REPEAL;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN
- EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of. County
Commissioners of Indian River County, that:
SECTION 1.
COMMISSION MEETINGS -AND PROCEDURES..
Chapter 102 - Board of County Commissioners
Meetings and Procedures of Title I as* set forth in
Attachment A to this ordinance is hereby adopted.
SECTION 2.
REPEAL.
Those portions of the Indian River County Code
(1974 edition) superseded or in conflict with the provisions
herein adopted, in particular Chapter 1, are hereby
repealed.
cPr-r 1 nm z
SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or if any sentence, paragraph,
phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding
shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and it shall be construed to have been the legislative
intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional,
Invalid or inoperative part.
SECTION 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon
confirmation from the Secretary of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 18
day of September , 1990.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach
40
W
� s �
Press -Journal on the 24 day of August 1990, for a
public hearing to be held on the 18 day of September
1990, at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Scurlock• seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By2,C `
aroly K. gger a
p
ATTACHMENT "A"
CHAPTER 102. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETINGS AND PROCEDURES
§ 102.01. Board of County Commissioners Meetings and
Procedures.
§ 102.02. Presiding Officer-.
§ 1-0.2.03. Call to Order.
§ 102.04..' Order of Business.
§ 102.0.5. Reading of Minutes.
§ 102.06. Rules of Debate.
§ 102.07.. Addressing.the Commission.
§•102.08. Silence constitutes affirmative vote
§ 102.09. Commissioner may file dissent.
§ 102.10. Ordinances, resolutions, and contracts. -
Section 102.01 Board of County Commissioners Meetings
and-Procceedures
1. Time. The County Commission shall generally -hold
regular meetings on the first four Tuesdays of each
month at 9:00 A.M., except that when the day fixed for
any regular meeting of the Commission is a holiday
41 BOOK E'A�E PJ
SEP IS 1990
_ J
_I
BOOK 81 PAGE
recognized by the County the meeting shall be held at
the same..time on the next,Tuesday not a holiday unless
the meeting is cancelled or otherwise rescheduled by
the Commission.
2. - Place. All meetings of the Commission shall be held in
the Commission Chambers, County Administration
Building, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, unless
otherwise decided by the Commission.'
3. Quorum. A majority of the Commission shall constitute
a quorum.
4. Agenda. Ail matters to be placed on the agenda for a
regular meeting shall be delivered to the County
Administrator on or before noon of the Wednesday before
the Commission meeting at which the matter -is to be
heard. The County Administrator shall then compile an
agenda kit arranged according to the order of business
and furnish each member of the Commission, and the
County Attorney with a kit on. or before Friday noon,
preceding the Commission meeting. An agenda kit shall
be kept for inspection by the public. Once the agenda
kits have been distributed no additional matters shall
be presented to the County Commission except with the
unanimous approval of the Commission.
5. Special Meetings. Special meetings may be held at the
ca I I of the Chairman, or, in his absence, at the call
of the Vice Chairman, or at the request of a majority
of the Commissioners; and, whenever practicable, shall
provide for not less than twelve hours notice to each
member and the public.
Section 102.02 Presiding Officer
The presiding officer shall conduct meetings pursuant to the
order of business. He shall preserve order and decorum and
shall state every question coming before the Commission,
announce the decision of the Commission on all subjects, and
decide -all questions of order, subject to an appeal by any
Commissioner to the Commission, in which event a majority
vote of the Commission shall determine the question of
order. The presiding officer shall vote on all questions
unless he abstains pursuant to general law. When
appropriate he shall sign all ordinances, resolutions, and
other documents adopted by the Commission during his
presence.
Section 102.03 Call to Order
The presiding officer shall take the chair at the hour
appointed for the meeting and shall call the Commission to
order.
Section 102.04 Order of Business
The order of business shall appear on the agenda as follows:
1. Cali to Order
2. Invocation
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Additions to the agenda/emergency Items
5. Proclamation and Presentations
42
� � r
6. Approval of Minutes
7. Consent Agenda
8. Constitutional Officers and Governmental Agencies
9. Public Items
a. Public Discussion Items
b. Public Hearings
10. County Administrator Matters
11. Departmental Matters
a. Community Development
b. Emergency Management
c. General Services
d. Leisure Services
e. Office of Management and Budget
f. Personnel
g. Public Works
h. Utilities
12. County Attorney Matters
13. Commissioners Matters
14. Special Districts
15. Adjournment
Section 102.05 Reading of Minutes
Unless a reading of the minutes of a Commission meeting is
requested by the Commission, the minutes may be approved
without reading if a copy has previously been furnished to
each Commissioner.
Section 102.06 Rules of Debate
1. Presiding Officer may debate. The presiding officer
may not move except for nominations but- may, second,
and debate from the chair, subject only to such
limitations of debate as are imposed on all members,
and shall not be deprived of any of the rights and
privileges of a Commissioner by reason of acting as
presiding officer.
2. Getting the Floor. Any Commissioner desiring to speak
shall address the chair and upon recognition by the
presiding officer, shall be confined to the questions under
debate.
1 3. Introduction before Commission. All substantive
matters requiring action by the Commission shall be
Introduced by motion and supported by a second.
4. Interruptions. Any Commissioner who has the floor
shall not be interrupted unless it is to preserve order
or to ask' for an explanation. ff a Commissioner is
called to order speaking shall cease until the question
of order is determined.
5. Privilege of closing debate. The Commissioner moving
the adoption of an ordinance, resolution, or motion
shall have the privilege of speaking last.
6. Votes Required. No action of the Commission shall be
valid unless adopted by the affirmative vote of at
least three members of the Commission, and, except as
required by state law, no more than three affirmative
votes shall be required to pass any motion except for
items to be added to the agenda once the agenda kits
have been distributed, in which case a unanimous vote
is required.
SEP 18 X99®
43
BOOK, FA,E O
i
SEP 18 1990
BOOK
7. Motion to reconsider. A motion to reconsider an action
taken by the Commission may be made only during the
session at which such action was taken. Such motion;
must be made by one on the prevailing side, but may be
seconded by any member. This section shall -not'
preclude any item on which Commission action has
already been taken from being placed on a subsequent
agenda. -
Section 102.07 Addressing the Commission
1. The County Officers shall have the. right ' to take part
In discussion, upon recognition by the presiding]
officer, at any time but may not vote. j
2. Any other person who desires to address the Commission!
may be recognized by the presiding officer, and when!
recognized shall step to the microphone, give his name,
and address, and then give his remarks, limiting his remarks
to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the
Commission.
Section 102.08 Silence constitutes affirmative vote
Unless a member of the Board states he is abstaining, his'
silence shall be recorded as an affirmative vote.
Section 102.09 Commissioner may file dissent
Any Commissioner may have the reasons for his dissent from
or protest against any action of the Commission entered in
the minutes.
Section 102.10 Ordinances, resolutions, and contracts
1. Preparation of ordinances. All ordinances shall be
approved by the County Administrator and the County
Attorney and no ordinance shall be prepared for
presentation to the Commission unless requested by a
Commissioner or County Officer.
2. Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions.
Each ordinance and resolution shall be adopted in
accordance with the procedures specified in Florida
Statutes.
3. Rates and fees by resolution. All rates, fees,
deposits, and charges adopted by the Commission will,
to the extent permitted by law, be adopted by
resolution rather than by ordinance.
4. All contract documents shall be coordinated with and
noted by the County Attorney and County Administrator
before presentation to Commission. Contracts that do
not require Commission action shall be noted by the
County Attorney before execution; provided, however,
County Attorney's review of purchase orders is not
required.
44
Chairman Eggert read aloud the title of the proposed
ordinance establishing Chapter 103 - Commissions and Boards.
Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing on Chapter 103 and
asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being
none, she closed the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 90-20, establishing Chapter 103 - Commissions
and Boards; providing repeal; providing severability;
and providing an effective date.
ORDINANCE 90- 20
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 103 -
COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS; PROVIDING
REPEAL; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIpING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by - the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, that:
SECTION 1:
COMMISSIONS AND BOARDS.
Chapter 103 - Commisions and Boards of Title I as
set forth in Attachment A to this ordinance ids hereby
adopted.
SECTION 2.'
REPEAL.
Those portions of the Indian River County Code
(1974 edition) superseded or in conflict with the provisions
herein adopted, in particular Chapter 1, are hereby
repealed.
SEP 18 1990 45 ROOK Fnr,E 0
BOOK 81 F'„GE4 UJ
SECTION 3.
SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or if any sentence, paragraph,
phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be unconstitutional,. inoperative, or void, such holding
shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and it shalt be construed to have been the. -legislative
intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional,
invalid or inoperative part.
SFrr 1 ntv u
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon
confirmation from the .Secretary of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 18
day of September , 1990.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach
-Press-Journal on the 24 day of August 1990 for a
public hearing to be held on the 18 day of September ,
1990, at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Scurlock seconded by Commissioner
Bowman and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By /eza��
Carol K. EggerhaC airman
46
r
ATTACHMENT "A"
CHAPTER 103. COMMISSION AND BOARDS
§ 103.01. General
§ 103.02. Provisions applicable to all to Commission and
Boards
§ 103.03. Regulatory Commission and Boards
§ 103.04. Advisory Commission and Boards.
§ 103.05. Tourist Development Council
Section 103.01 General
The Board of County Commissioners will, from time to time,
establish Commissions and Boards to advise the Board of
County Commissioners and staff with respect to specific
governmental action by making decisions on the disposition
of certain matters coming before the Board or Commission.
Commissions and Boards which give only advice are designated
"Advisory". Commissions and Boards which give advice and
take governmental action are designated "Regulatory".
Section 103.02 General provisions applicable to all
Commissions and Boards
1. Terms, reappointment and vacancies. Unless specified
otherwise, the regular term of office shall be two
years. Members may serve until their successors are
appointed. Members may be reappointed. Vacancies
shall be filled for the unexpired term.
2. Number of members. All boards and commissions shall
have five members each unless. otherwise stated in the
documents creating the board.
3. Appointment dates. All appointments shall be from the
first meeting of that. board in January of each
odd -numbered year with the terms staggered so that the
number of people appointed shall be equal or in
j proportion to the number of Commission -seats normally
filled In the previous election.
! In order to effectuate this policy, the present terms of all
! commission and board members in office at the time -of
adoption. of this - code may be extended or shortened by
resolution of the commission or the normal appointment terms
may be shortened.
4. Removal. Members shall serve at the pleasure of the
County Commission.
5. Absence of Members. Absence of any member from. three
consecutive meetings without approval of the commission
or board on which he sits shall constitute an
abandonment of the office by such member.
6. Serve in advisory capacity. Commissions and boards
shall act only 1n an advisory capacity to the County
Commission except as otherwise provided.
SEP! 18 1990
47
1A00K 81 F-, c 4011
I
MK
i
7. Compensation. Members shall receive no salary, but the
County Commission may make provision for the payment of
any expenses necessary to the proper functioning of the
commission or board.
8. Meetings. Unless otherwise provided, all meetings,
sha I -I be given pub I i c notice by the Executive Aide to
the Commission, shall be open to the public, and shall
generally be held in -the County Commission Chambers,:
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach. Unless provided by the
Clerk of the Court or a Department secretary, the
Executive Aide shall provide secretaries for all;
commissions;and boards. and shall keep minutes and a
permanent record of their proceedings. A copy of thei
minutes shaft be'forwarded to the Board to the County".
Commission upon request.
9. Election of Officers. A county commissioner, if a
member of a commission or board shall chair that;
commission or board; otherwise, each commission and j
board* shall elect a chairman and a vice-chairman'
annually in the month of January, or at its next
meeting if no meeting is held in January.
1.0. Rules of procedure. Each commission and board shall
follow such appropriate rules of procedure as are set
forth by this code for the County Commission and shall
meet as necessary.
11. Quorum. A majority of members of -any commission or
board shall constitute a quorum.
12. Commission or board action. Any matter, motion, or
application before any commission or board with five
members or less must receive the affirmative vote of at
least three members for passage. Any matter, motion,
or application before any commission or board with more
than five members .must receive the affirmative vote of
at least four members and a majority of those present
for passage. Any matter, motion, or application which
is voted on and which receives less than the number of
votes required for passage shall be deemed to have been
denied.
Section 103.03 Regulatory Commissions and Boards
1. Planning and Zoning Commission. There is hereby,
created a Planning and Zoning Commission to carry out
the procedures, duties, and functions set forth for it
In the zoning ordinances. The board shall consist of
seven (7) members. The board shall be the Local
Planning Agency for the County. All members shall be
residents of the county.
2. Board of Zoning Adjustment. There is hereby created a
Board of Zoning Adjustment to carry out the procedures,
duties, and functions set forth for it in the zoning
ordinances. All members shall be residents of Indian
River County.
3. Building Code Board of Adjustment and Appeals. There
Is hereby created the Building Code Board of Adjustment
and Appeals. The board shall consist of (7) members.
The membership of the board shall to the extent
practicable, consist of at least one architect, one
48
M
engineer, one general contractor, and four (4) members
with experience in the building industry. One member
of the board shall be a representative of the board of
the zoning adjustments.
4. Code Enforcement Board. There is hereby created the
Indian River County Code Enforcement Board pursuant to
authority and procedures of Chapter 162, Florida
Statutes. The Board shall be constituted and have
powers and responsibilities as set forth 'in Chapter
162, Florida Statutes.
S. Indian River County Environmental Control Board. There
is hereby created the Indian River County Environmental
Control Board pursuant to the authority and procedures
of Chapter 85-427, Laws of Florida. The Board shall be
constituted and have powers and responsibility as set
forth in said laws of Florida. It shall appoint a
five -member hearing board pursuant to and with powers
provided by said Laws of Florida.
Section 103.04 Advisory Commissions and Boards
All advisory boards or commissions shall be created by
resolution instead of by ordinance. The Executive Aide
shall keep a current list of all advisory board resolutions
with a current roster of their membership and shall provide
notice and minutes for all meetings.
Section 103.05 Tourist Development Council
1. There is hereby established and appointed a County
Tourist DeyeIopment Council consisting of the- Chairman
of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County or another member of the Board of County
Commissioners as designated by the Chairman; two (2)
elected municipal officers, one of whom shall be from
the most populous municipality in the County; three (3)
owners or operators of motels, hotels, recreational
vehicle parks, or other tourist accommodations, within
the County; and three (3) persons• who are involved In
the tourist industry and who have demonstrated an
interest in tourist development, but who are not owners
or operators of motels, hotels, recreational vehicle
parks, or other tourist accommodations. All members of
the Council sha-Il-be electors of the County.
2. " The members of the Council shall be appointed by the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
and shall serve for terms of four (4) years;
3. .The Chairman of --the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County or his designee who is a member of
the Board of County Commissioners shall be the Chairman
of the Tourist Development Council.
4. The Council shall, from time to time, make
recommendations to ,the Board of Cou-nty Commissioners
for the effective operation of special projects or for
uses of the tourist development tax revenue. _ The
Council shall continuously review expenditures of
revenues from the tourist development trust fund and-
, shall receive, at least quarterly, expenditure reports
from the Board of County Commissioners or its designee.
Expenditures 'which the Council believes to be
SEP '1 8 1990 49 guar Face Ub
I
BOOK 81 FAU 0 7
unauthorized shall be reported to the Board of County
Commissioners and to the Department of Revenue. The
Board of- County Commissioners and the Department of
Revenue shall review the findings of the Council and
take appropriate administrative or judicial action to
- ensure compliance with Section 125.0104, Florida
Statutes.
Chairman*Eggert read aloud the title of the proposed
ordinance establishing Chapter 104 - Personnel.
Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing on Chapter 104 and
asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being
none, she closed the- Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 90-21, establishing Chapter 104 - Personnel;
ro
providing for repeal; providing severability; and
providing an effective date.
ORDINANCE 90--24
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 104 -
PERSONNEL; PROVIDING REPEAL; PROVIDING
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, that:
SECTION 1.
PERSONNEL.
Chapter 104 - Personnel of Title I as set forth in
Attachment A to this ordinance is hereby adopted.
SECTION 2.
REPEAL.
Those portions of the Indian River County Code
(1974 edition) superseded or in conflict with the provisions
herein adopted, in particular Chapter 1, are hereby
repealed.
50
� � r
SECTION 3.
SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or
if any sentence, paragraph,
phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any reason held to
be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding
shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and it shall be construed to have been the legislative
intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional,
Invalid or inoperative part.
SECTION 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon
confirmation from the.Secretary of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 18
day of September 0 1990.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach
Press -Journal on the 24 day of August 1990, for a
s
public hearing to be held on the I jq_ day of ,
1990, at which time 1t was moved for adoption by
Commissioner Scurlock seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler , and adopted by -the -following vote:
i Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
j Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
I
j Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
-Commissioner Don C. Scurlock,.Jr. Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
BOARD•OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Carolyry Egger airman
Attest By o�
Je f rQj Kj B4rton
Clerk
' V /7����►
SEP 51 RUGS r't'uG,1
SEP 181990 B00K 81 FnE W
ATTACHMENT "A"
CHAPTER 104. PERSONNEL
§ 104.01. Equal.Employment Opportunity
§ 104.02. Administrative Policy Manual
§ 104.03. Retirement System
§,104.04. Federal Social Security Act
§ 104.05. Deferred Compensation
Section 104.01 Equal Employment Opportunity
It is the policy of Indian River County to provide equal
opportunity 1n employment to all employees and applicants
for employment. No person shall be discriminated against in
employment because of such 'individual's race, religion,'
color, sex, age, marital status, national orgin, or physical
handicap.
Section 104.02 Administrative Policy Manual
The Director of Personnel shall maintain under the direction'
of the County Administrator a policy manual which shall be a
compilation of policies, practices, and procedures that
apply to managers, supervisors and employees of Indian River'
County. This manual shall be updated, from time to time,
with the approval of the County Commission. This manual is
available in the office of Director of Personnel, and the
office of each Department or Division. All employees should
be encouraged to become familiar with the contents of this
manual.
Section 104.03 Retirement System
Employees working in a full-time or part-time regularly
established positions have membership in the Florida
Retirement System (FRS). FRS is noncontributory for
members; contributions are made on behalf of the members b"
the County.
Section 104.04 Federal Social Security Act
The benefits of the system of old age and survivor's
insurance as authorized by the Federal Social Security Act,
as amended, is extended to all employees.
Section 104.05
Deferred Compensation
A deferred compensation plan, currently administered by ICMA
Retirement Corporation, is available on an optional basis to
employees. This program is a supplement to a retirement
Income and it provides for a tax deferral on income
contributed to the plan.
52
Chairman Eggert read aloud the title of Chapter 800 -
Comprehensive Plan.
Chairman Eggert questioned the cross -outs on pages 13, 14,
15 in this chapter, and Attorney Vitunac explained that the
theory behind this was how much we should put in the County Code
which exactly copies State law. Chairman Eggert has raised a
good point that the people who read our Comp Plan law may not
have a copy of the Florida law and may want to know the entire
procedure by reading one volume. The feeling of staff was that
perhaps we could copy the relevant portions of State law and how
the process works and include a chart in our local ordinance, and
then just reference the people to Chapter 163 and other State
.laws because there should be something of State law copied in
here. Every time we rewrite this chapter we will update it
'annually so that it keeps us as close as possible to State law.
The other issue concerned whether our Code should have the
adopted portions of the Comp Plan in the Code or be a reference
manual which you could refer to. He felt the consensus of the
group that met yesterday was that it should be in the Code. The
implications are that there will be a higher copying expense
and potentially a third volume of the Code. On the brighter
side, however, you will have the entire portions relevant to our
Zoning Code in front of you without having to refer to some other
document. Attorney Vitunac-advised that Director Keating felt
that out of the,1700 pages, he could get it down to 400 pages,
but Chairman*Eggert noted that is only the adopted portions, and
not the entire Comp Plan.
Attorney Vitunac felt that we could get it all into two
volumes at the beginning and Title I would be in with Title VIII.
Discussion ensued on how to include the land use maps in the
Code, but Commissioner Scurl'ock was reluctant to.have the maps
included -since they are constantly changing and aren't the actual
working documents.
53 PUO PAGE 4_1
SES 18
_I
SEP
18
1990
BOOK
F'Ai;E 411
Attorney Vitunac suggested that
if the Board didn't
want the
land -use maps included, we could say that the maps are.on file in
the Community Development Office.
Commissioner understood that whenever we make a minor change
in.the Comp Plan, it is 3=6 months before we get the printed Code
pages back and then distribute the supplements. The po.int-is
that the more inserting, the more money it costs.
Chairman Eggert agreed., bu.t she didn't feel there was going
to be that many changes•to the Goals,.Objectives., and Policies,
which are the main guides.
Administrator Chandler advised that we are estimating
$30,000-$40,000 for 200 copies of two volumes of the larger size.
Commissioner Scurlock suggested that we go with Goals,
Objectives and Policies, and leave the maps out, and the
Commissioners indicated their agreement to leaving the maps out.
Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing on Chapter 800
the Comprehensive Plan, and asked if anyone wished to be heard in
this matter. There being none, she closed the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 90-22, establishing Chapter 800 -
Comprehensive Plan; providing repeal; providing
severability; and providing an effective date; ......
the Motion should reference the maps and have them
produced outside this basic document; add the Goals,
Objectives & Policies; and have selected parts of the
Florida Statutes outlined in the procedures in the
back; with those changes to be handled by the County
Attorney and the Director of Community Development.
54
ORDINANCE NO. 90-2_
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ESTABLISHING TITLE VIII, CHAPTER
800 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CODE OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; PROVIDING REPEAL;
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, that:
SECTION I.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
Chapter 800 - Title Vill - The Code, Comprehensive
Plan, as set forth in Attachment "A" to this ordinance is
hereby adopted.
SECTION 2.
REPEAL.
Those portions of the Indian River County Code
(1974 edition) superseded or in conflict with the provisions
herein adopted, in particular Chapter 171-03 are hereby
repealed and the remaining portions renumbered as Chapter
800.
SECTION 3.
SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or
If any sentence, paragraph,
phrase, or word of this ordinance is for any.reason held to
i
be unconstitutional, inoperative,- or void, such holding
shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and it shall -be construed to have been the legislative
intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional,
invalid or inoperative part. - -
SECTION 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon
i
confirmation from the Secretary of State.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 18
day of September 1990,
55 E00 E 41
SEP 18 199®
SEPI 9 1,990
BOOK 81 F,1GE 13
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach
Press -Journal on the 24th day of August, 1990, for a public
hearing to be held on the 18th day of'September, 1990, at
which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner
ScurlockBird
seconded by 'Commissioner and
adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert _ Ave
Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird
. Aye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman _eye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Ave
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By /L
Caro K. Egg,pej, Chairman
Attest By
low
leli� —
K. arton,lerk.
�j Y N44 U.
Acknowledgment bythe Department of State of the State of
Florida, this21
st day of September , 1990.
Effective date: Acknowledgment from the Department of State
received on this21st day of September , 1990, at 10:30
a.m./p.m. and fiIVd1 n the Office of the Clerk of the-Toar7
-f—County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida.
ATTACHMENT "A" IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
IN THE BULKY FILES
Indian River Cm
Approved Date
Adman.
re 7 10190
6
Legal
4' , A3 %
Deot.
Risk Mgr.
N/A
56
I
SALARY INCREASE
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/12/90:
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: September 12, 1990 FILE:
SUBJECT: SALARY INCREASE
FRO • James E. Chandler REFERENCES:
County Administrator
As you .are aware, with submission of the proposed FY 90-91 budget I
.recommended and included funding for an across-the-board salary adjustment
of 4.5%. The adjustment would be applicable to all employees under the
Boards jurisdiction with the exception of contractual and those covered by
the Fire contract that is still under negotiation. With the final budget having
been approved at the September 12, 1990 hearing, I would request
authorization to implement the adjustment effective the first pay period of the
fiscal year.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
d
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved
an across-thEboard salary adjustment of 4.50 for County
employees, as set out in the above staff
recommendation.
57
door 8.31. Fncc,[ 1 1
SEP i g 1990%E 415
RESOLUTION - APPROVAL OF FY 90-91 EMS GRANT PROGRAM FOR COUNTIES
APPLICATION
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/11/90:
TO:' Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Department of Emergency Services
DATE: September 11, 1990
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FY 90-91 EMS GRANT PROGRAM FOR COUNTIES
APPLICATION
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein
be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at.the next scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Office of
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is authorized by Chapter 401, Part
II, Florida Statutes, to distribute county grant funds. The funds
are then made available to eligible county governments to improve
and expand their pre -hospital emergency medical services. The
grant program is an innovative process which enables EMS agencies
to improve and expand EMS systems through their respective -Board
of County Commissioners. Recurring costs for EMS remain the
Yesponsibility of the county government.
A grant application has been prepared describing the needs and
proposing grant objectives and time frames in which the objectives
will be obtained.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The County grant funds are derived from surcharges on various
traffic violations. Funding in the amount of $37,099.09 has been
allocated to Indian River County for FY 90-91, plus $767.79 in
interest and carryover for a total grant allocation of $37,866.88.
The monies will be utilized as indicated to improve and expand the
ALS EMS pre -hospital system. A total of $6.79 is estimated as
unexpended from FY 89-90 and $7.61 in interest has been earned on
the grant which added to the total amount available for
expenditure.
Funds have been allocated this year for the purchase of a pulse.,
oximetry units for each emergency transport vehicle, typewriter,`
computer equipment with printers, CPR training equipment, copier,
and communications equipment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the FY 90-91 EMS Grant Program
Application and resolution to purchase of the capital equipment
items noted in the grant application including a budget amendment.
Staff also requests that the Board authorize the Chairman to
execute the necessary documents to obtain funds from the'Department
of Health and Rehabilitative Services in the amount of $37,099.09
to improve and expand the pre -hospital EMS system in the County.
58
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo and
adopted Resolution 90-145, authorizing the application
for funding County Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
awards to be submitted to the State of Florida
Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, as
set out in the above staff recommendation.
!GRANT APPLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD
59
i
BOOP(
RESOLUTION NO. 90-145
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY; FLORIDA,
AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING COUNTY
EMERGENCY MEDICAL_ -SERVICES (EMS) AWARDS TO.BE
SUBMITTED TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES.
WHEREAS, The Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative
Services has announced that applications for funding County
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) awards are now being accepted and
fund allocations have been identified for Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, an application for funding has been prepared.and
approved by the • County; .and
NOW, THEREFORE, -BE IT. RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM-
MISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Chairman is
authorized to sign and executed the Applications for funding
certifying that monies from the County EMS -Grant Program For
Counties will improve and expand the County's pre -hospital EMS
system and that the funds will not be used to supplant existing
County EMS budget allocations.
ScurlThe foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner
ock who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner WhePlPr and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Ave
Vice -Chairman Richard N. Bird nip
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Awe
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler n e
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 18 day of September , 1990.
W
ATTEST: r--
.'�y f ey Barton, Clerk
V. y�
()
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY: z2a�
Caroli K. EggerV Chairman
60
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF GRAND HARBOR GOLF 8 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
FACILITY LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 8/31/90:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
r.
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. G",,!�
Public Works Director (J
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E.j
County Engineer
FROM: David B. Cox, P.E.4p&_,
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Grand Harbor Golf & Grounds
Maintenance Facility Land Development Permit
REFERENCE: PRD -88-06-08
DATE: August 31, 1990
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Land Development Permit No. 085 was issued on October 31, 1989 to
Fleming of Vero - River Harbor, Inc. to construct a 4.01 acre
golf and grounds maintenance facility. The site is located
adjacent to the east side of the Indian River Boulevard, Phase.IV
right-of-way, approximately z mile south of 53rd Street. Because
construction has not begun, the permit expired on May 1, 1990,
180 days after the approval date. The applicant's engineer,
McQueen & Associates, Inc. has submitted a written request for an
extension of the permit.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The Utilities Services Department staff has indicated that a
utilities construction permit was issued on January 12, 1989 for
sewer services that would be available, for the site to connect
to. The original• conditions of the Land Development Permit
required the site to connect to sewer and water services as soon
as they become available •and that new utility construction
permits will be required for the site connections.
The Community Development Department staff has requested that the
following three conditions of the concurrently expired Land
Clearing and Tree Removal Permits be included as conditions of
the extension of the Land Development Permit:
1. Tree protection barriers shall be erected around oaks and
other protected trees to be saved prior to clearing
activity, as per the depiction on the approved site plan.
2. The staked areas and tree barriers shall be inspected and
verified by County Environmental Planning staff prior to
clearing commencement.
3. Debris from clearing shall be removed to an approved
disposal facility or burned with Division of Forestry
approval.
The Land Clearing and Tree Removal Permits would automatically be
extended with the Land Development Permit. The four original
conditions of the October 31, 1989 Land Development Permit
approval would also apply to the extension.
L_ SEP 18 1990 - _ J
BooK81 f,qUE 19
Alternate No. 1
Grant extensions of the Land Development Permit and Land Clearing
and Tree Removal Permits with the conditions described above.
Alternate No. 2
Deny extension and require. the developer to submit new
applications, and review fees for land development, land clearing
and tree removal permits.
-RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval -of Alternate No. 1.
Commissioner Bowman asked if there was any provision that
says. that land clearing/tree removal may not be done except just
prior to construction. In other words, can a developer go in and
a
clear and then maybe never develop?
Public Works Director Jim Davis understood that once they
have a land clearing permit and a tree removal permit, they can
go in and clear the land. They are under the timeframe of the
permit. They must complete the work by a certain time. That is
why this is before the Board today. Their land clearing permit
did expire, but as it relates to this particular project, he
didn't believe there was a tremendous amount of clearing for the
golf maintenance facility itself.
Commissioner Bowman felt that the removal of 7 oak trees was
considerable.
Commissioner Scurlock wished to ask a couple of questions of
the applicant for the purpose of establishing it on the record,
since RTC is here and because bids were received the other day on
Grand Harbor, and it is certain that at some point in the future
there will be some changes here. He just wanted to make sure
that we are clear about this before we approve any additional
requests for any extensions.
62
M
Commissioner Scurlock asked Darrell McQueen, engineer on the
project, if all the water and sewer impact fees are either
current or actually ahead of schedule, and Mr. McQueen replied
that he believed they are all ahead of schedule.
Commissioner Scurlock asked if it was Mr. McQueen's under-
standing that under the original Regional Planning Council's
requirements, there is a requirement for certain improvements to
be made in the future, such as ground storage for water, and Mr.
McQueen replied affirmatively. He believed it is a 200,000
gallon ground storage tank, and stated that they do not debate
that as a requirement.
Commissioner Scurlock asked if there are any other fees or
responsibilities that Mr. McQueen knew of where the developer
still owes the County or is not current on, and Mr. McQueen
answered "No, but there are some impact fees that are associated
with this particular club itself once they are ready to start
construction.
Commissioner Scurlock asked staff if there is anything out
0
there as a housekeeping matter that needs to be taken care of,
and Administrator Chandler advised that there is nothing other
than the overpass of Phase IV of Indian River Boulevard.
Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that we are
talking about where Indian River Boulevard is projected to go
over the tunnel to serve the golf course.
Commissioner Scurlock believed that it needs to be pointed
out that Grarid Harbor has been a good.neighbor in our community,
and, of course, we all were sad -about their financial plight.
However, many things have become possible with the Grand Harbor
project, such as the extension of Indian River Boulevard and the
extension of the County's water and sewer systems into that area.
They have worked with us, and he felt it is important to get this
on the record in case there is a change so there is no question
about what was
required and what was agreed to.
P18 1990
8m
6 3�
'
F}q;� 412.0
SEP -18 1990.
I
i
BOOK F,�GE 421
Mr. McQueen advised that there has been some minor under -
brushing on the site for the purpose of surveying for protected
trees. He stated that no protected,trees have been removed from
the site. In their survey they have made every effort to locate
the trees and shift the trees around to save as many as possible:
In the initial site plan.that was approved by this Board, they
set aside more natural buffer than was required by the ordinance)
In fact, the buffering that'they did in their plan.pretty much
confirms to today's ordinances with respect to the 15% retainage)
of natural vegetation. Mr. McQueen emphasized that there has
been
nothing
done on
the site
to try to move
ahead with
clearing'
off
the land
prior to
building.the
houses.
Their permit
was to
have expired May 1, 1990, and they sent a letter to the County on
April 27, 1990, requesting a permit extension. Their main
concern is that if the Board should grant the extension, the
extension is for 180 days to commence construction, and
construction must be completed 12 months after that 180 days. If
it is at all possible, they would like to request that the
extension begin from today's date rather than May 1st.
Attorney Vitunac felt we have the legal flexibility to do
that, but would like the opportunity to ask Director Keating if
he is aware of this and it doesn't conflict with something he is
doing.
While waiting for Director Keating to return to Chambers,
John Fleming reported that they received a number of bids, and
although they are under a gag order right now -until they analyze
the different parts of those bids, he could say that the quality
of the people who bid was excellent and most of them were major
companies. The bid parameters were for cash, so they feel that
from what they have seen so far that Grand Harbor will fall into
the hands of somebody who is more than capable of doing the job.
Mr. McQueen advised that a lot of the prospective bidders
contacted his office and asked about the status of the permits
64
that were required. The club maintenance facility was one of
those permits that probably was in place at the time subject to
the granting of the extension. If the Board doesn't grant the
180 -day extension from today's date, they would have to start
construction in 30 days because the permit would expire and it
would put them in a difficult position.
Commissioner Scurlock felt there is a special timing consid-
eration here subject to Director Keating's answer.
Attorney Vitunac advised that the law says that site plan
approval may be extended by the Board one time only for a good
.cause for a period not to exceed 12 months.
Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that the question here is
when do the 12 months start, and Attorney Vitunac replied that if
it wasn't extended, they would have to start over.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
a one-year extension of the Land Development Permit for
i
the Grand Harbor Golf 8 Grounds Maintenance Facility,
the extension to begin from today's date.
GREASE TRAP AND POLLUTANT INTERCEPTOR ORDINANCE
The Board
reviewed the following memo dated 8/31/90:
DATE:
AUGUST 311, 1990
TO:
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM:
TERRANCE G. PINTO•
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
STAFFED AND
JOHN F. LANG
PREPARED BY:
ENVIRONMENTAL PECIALIST
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: GREASE TRAP AND POLLUTANT INTERCEPTOR ORDINANCE
BACKGROUND:
The Board of County - Commissioners, on February 13, 1990, adopted a
portion of the Comprehensive Plan. The adopted- portion of the plan
65 FnL 424;
10 1®
SEP -18 1990. 8 1 F'acE 44o 0
included the Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element. The sub -element in Policy
6.8 stipulates that a Grease and Fuel Oil Interceptor Ordinance be
implemented by September 1, 1990. The Department of Utility
Services and the Public Health Unit have jointly drafted; the
attached ordinance. The ordinance will set standards for
installation, and will provide for variances, exemptions,
permitting, inspections, requirements relating to necessity; and
maintenance, and for enforcement.
ANALYSIS:
The Department of Utility Services must protect its sewer systems
and treatment plants from grease and petroleum product degradation.
This ordinance will provide the means and. tracking to accomplish
that goal. • The ordinance was workshopped August 10, 1990, and
incorporated -comments are produced inbold face type ini the
document.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners authorize publication for a public hearing so
as to adopt the attached Pollutant Interceptor and Grease Trap
Ordinance and provide a methodology of tracking and monitoring
grease traps in the County.
Chairman Eggert noted that there is a new recommendation,
and Utilities Director Terry Pinto advised that they would like
to have the proposed grease trap ordinance advertised for the
regular BCC meeting of October 16, 1990.
Commissioner Bowman suggested a change in Item #5 in Section
VII on page 6. Instead of "Grease and/or pollutants may only be
removed by approved haulers", it should say, "Grease and/or
pollutants shall be removed only by approved haulers and disposed
of at a location authorized by Indian River County and the Health
Department."
Commissioner Scurlock asked Director Pinto to define
"grease", and Director Pinto explained that grease comes in many
disguised forms, such as soap, cooking materials, etc.
Chairman Eggert requested that a clearer definition of
"grease" be included in Section II - Definitions.
66
M
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to advertise a public hearing on the proposed
grease trap/pollutants ordinance for October 16, 1990
with the change in Section VII as suggested by
Commissioner Bowman, and the inclusion of a'definition
of grease.
WELL CLOSURE AGREEMENT WITH ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 8/28/90:
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1990
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR '
FROM: 'TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITS VICES
PREPARED JOHN F. LANG
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL PECIALIST
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WELL CLOSURE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
ST. JOHN'S RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BACKGROYJND
The Board of County Commissioners on October 3, 1989, approved' an
agreement with St. John's River Water Management District to share
equally in the costs of well closures in Indian River County. The
Department of Utility Services acquires wells in its acquisition of
private utility systems.
ANALYSIS
The Department of Utility Services has budgeted $15;000.00 again
this year for well closures and requests the ability to avail itself
of the contracted closing -services and inspection as provided by St.
John's .River Water Management District. These services have
satisfactorily closed old utility wells at Bent Pine, the -Ixora
Distribution Yard, the King's Highway. Water Tower site, * the
Mid -Florida Water Tower site, the County Grove, Park Place, and
Vista Royale.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners execute the renewal of the interlocal agreement
between St. John's River Water Management District and Indian River
County and authorize the spending of funds from Account No.
../471-000-166-002.00 for well closures.
67
PUOr 8 i PAGE :r 11
a
SERI 8 1990 moK 81 o E 15
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the
renewal of the interlocal agreement with St. Johns
River Water Management District, as set out in the
above staff recommendation.
COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED RENEWAL AGREEMENT IS ON FILE -IN -THE
OFFICE OF THE*CLERK TO THE BOARD
DER RECYCLING AND EDUCATION GRANT.APPLICATION
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/4/90:
DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1990
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATO
THRU: TERRANCE G. PI
DIRECTOR OF UTI I SERVICES
FROM: RONALD R. BROOKS, MANAGER
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
SUBJECT: THIRD -YEAR DER RECYCLING/EDUCATION GRANT APPLICATION
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE
BACKGROUND:
As part of the Florida Department of Environmental Regulationis
third -year Recycling and Education Grant application, the com-
pleted application forms, tables, narrative and Exhibits must be
submitted to the DER in time to be received by Oct. 1, 1990. Each
grant application must be signed off with the signature of the
county's Authorized Representative. This individual is the
Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. The Solid Waste
Disposal District has completed the third -year Recycling and
Education Grant application as per DER instruction. When it has
been signed by the Authorized Representative it will be forwarded
to the DER.
ANALYSIS:
The County has in place a joint agreement with all municipalities
for application to the DER for grant funds that are to be
utilized by the Solid Waste Disposal District for continuation of
the Recycling Program. The attached application outlines the
proposed program for the fiscal -year 1990-91. The program
includes continued development of recycling centers at the
Districts' solid waste collection centers " as well as
implementation of a mandatory Recycling Program and an intensive,
ongoing public education program.
RECOMMENDATION:
District Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the subject application and authorize the chairman to
sign the application for submittal to the DER by October 1, 1990.
68
� � r
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously
approved the application to the DER as set out
in the above staff recommendation.
COPY OF APPLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD
EFFLUENT DISPOSAL MASTER PLAN
Utilities Director Terry Pinto introduced Joann Jackson and
Robert Morrell, engineers with Post, Buckley Schuh & Jernigan,
Inc., who presented the Executive Summary of the Effluent
Disposal Master Plan, excerpts from which are as follows:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REUSE MASTER PLAN
Providing the County with an efficient Effluent Disposal Master Plan first
required development of a Reuse Master Plan since reuse will be the primary
disposal method. This approach was based on the following reasons:
o The County must protect its fresh groundwater supplies from salt-
water intrusion and upconing -- using reclaimed water to meet irri-
gation water needs (reuse) lessens the demand on fresh water
supplies and provide recharge to diminish further salt water
encroachment.
i
o Because of the highly protective classifications of surface waters
in the County, disposal to these waters will be very restrictive.
I
SEP 18 1
S P181
Projected wastewater flows for the year .1995 and 2005 for each of the County
regional plants are summarized in Table E-1. Various effluent disposal options
are being used or are permitted for use at the regional treatment facilities.
These methods are summarized in Table E-2. The primary effluent disposal means
used in the County is land application, with more recent projects involving
reuse ,irrigation systems. ------
69
-I
SEP 18 1990
ROOK
i
Table E-1
PROJECTED REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FLOWSa
Phase I Phase II
i
(Year 1995) (Year 2005)
Average Daily Flow Average Daily Flow
Area (MGD) (MGD)
South 3,85 4.25
West 2.80 3.20
Central 3.00 4.10
North 1.00 6.00
i
Sea Oaks- 0.50 0.75
TOTAL 11.15 18.30
I
i
a The source for these flows is the "Indian River County Wastewater Master
Plan" (1988),
i
except as indicated below:
o Because of recent agreements between the County and City of Sebastian,
the flows for the North are anticipated by the County to be greater than
i indicated in the Master Plan. The County projected, subsequent to the
Wastewater Master Plan, total flow by the year 2005 to be 6.0 MGD (total
year 2005 flows projected in the Master Plan were 1.5 MGD).
o The Sea Oaks WWTP was recently acquired by the County and not included in
the Wastewater Master Plan. The County has projected year 1995 and 2005
flows the
.for north beaches area and plans to use the Sea Oaks WWTP to
treat these flows.
Table E-2
PERMITTED EFFLUENT DISPOSAL METHODS '
Capacity
Region WWTP Disposal Method (MGD)
South Vista Royale Mosquito Impoundments Ie) 0.50
Vista Gardens Mosquito Impoundments (e 0.15
Vero "—•-h Highlands Percolation Ponds (e) 0.40
-- I
TOTAL CAPACITY 1.05
West West Regional Percolation Ponds (e) 0.33
Percolation Ponds (p) 0.44
Citrus Irrigation (p) 0.98
Sod Farm -Irrigation (e) 0.58
TOTAL CAPACITY 2.00a
`
Central Central Regional Percolation Ponds (e) b
!or Gifford) Golf Course (e) 1.00
Golf Course (p) 0.75
TOTAL CAPACITY 1.75
North, North Regional Golf Course (p) 1_00
TOTAL CAPACITY 1.00
North Barrier
Island Sea Oaks Residential Irrigation (e) 0.21
TOTAL CAPACITY 0.21
TOTAL PERMITTED DISPOSAL CAPACITY 6.01
Legend:
e " Existing
p " Permitted, but not presently used.
Notes:
a It is proposed that the existing percolation ponds will be utilized as a
- backup when other disoosal is on-line.
b Existing percolation ponds serve as wet weather discharge and do not provide
additional capacity.
70
o Most of the County consists of poor hydrogeological conditions for
rapid rate disposal systems, such as percolation ponds.
o In the past, the County has opposed the use of deep well injection.
o Regulatory agencies have taken a position to strongly encourage
reuse, particularly in coastal areas such as Indian River County.
Additional benefits of using reclaimed water include extension of the service
life of the County's existing raw water supply and maximization of existing'
water treatment facilities. Reclaimed water also provides an ideal resource for
irrigation because it can often contain nutrients that can reduce fertilizer
requirements and can generally be supplied to the end user at a more economical
rate than potable water (particularly where reverse osmosis treatment is
required for potable demands).
Identification of large users, such as golf courses, is the first step in
developing a reuse system. The County has already taken the initiative on this
step by utilizing the Hawk's Nest Golf Course to dispose of reclaimed water from
the Central (Gifford) WWTP. The Grand Harbor and Sandridge golf courses are
permitted with the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) as
reclaimed water reuse sites once reclaimed water becomes available from the
a
Central and North WWTPs, respectively.
The Effluent Reuse Capacity Analysis Program (ERCAP) was used as a planning tool
to estimate the total Phase I and II reuse demands within the five County
service areas. ERCAP was developed by PBSAJ to aid in selecting potential reuse
sites and estimating probable reuse capacity.
It was determined, based on the ERCAP analysis, that the County has adequate
reuse capacity to meet Phase II effluent disposal requirements. Three
alternative reuse scenarios were developed that included:
o • Irrigating all *potential areas of the County (existing and future
single-family, multi -family, and commercial areas; golf courses; and
citrus groves).
o . Irrigating all potential areas of the County as .described above,
with the exception of existing and future single-family residential
areas.
o Irrigating all potential areas of the County as described above,
with the exception of existing single-family residential areas.
SEP 71 BE
1 8 1990 OOK PAG
SEP 18 1990
BOOK 1 f riUt
The second alternative listed above (referenced in the report as Alternative B!
is recommended for. implementation. The general areas to be served with'
reclaimed -water for irrigation are highlighted on Figure .E-2. A description -of
users follows.
v C
e 8■T■ AYL r
68TH AVL
WD AM
140
IS
• ♦ \\\\\\\\ ■M AVE'AVL-,
• • \ask ■ ■ ■ .�
o �_ �, . ■
e so AVL
e e ■ -
.w Q ' :�\■ Arc
I
GENERAL REUSE AREAS FOR THE RECOMMENDED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM (ALT. B) Fl
E-1
C
101
W-
Wfir
// �� '�
� �■:�P��
•.'�I���
v C
e 8■T■ AYL r
68TH AVL
WD AM
140
IS
• ♦ \\\\\\\\ ■M AVE'AVL-,
• • \ask ■ ■ ■ .�
o �_ �, . ■
e so AVL
e e ■ -
.w Q ' :�\■ Arc
I
GENERAL REUSE AREAS FOR THE RECOMMENDED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM (ALT. B) Fl
E-1
South Region: Primary users include Vista Royale Golf Course,
condominium grounds, and mosquito impoundments; Vista Gardens Golf
Course, condominium grounds, and mosquito impoundments; and the City of
Vero Beach (through their proposed reuse system). With these
primary users and other multi -family and commercial developments
along U.S. 1, most of the disposal needs in the South can be met.
Irrigation of citrus groves west of Vero Beach Highlands is also
recommended to provide additional capacity. Since these groves are
located in an area zoned for residential development, overall
estimated capacities were based on the lower residential reuse rate
rather than citrus irrigation rate. By using this approach,
establishing 20 -year reuse agreements with existing grove owners
would not limit the ability of the property to be developed at a later
date as zoned.
West Region: This is the only region with a recommended plan based
almost entirely on citrus irrigation (with the exception of the existing
sod farm. Most of the citrus considered in this region is zoned
agricultural, allowing higher per acre estimated reuse capacities. Based
on a windshield survey, most groves also appear to be utilizing in -ground
low pressure irrigation systems rather than flood irrigation, improving
' I
potential implementation. Should the County be unable to reach
agreements with a sufficient number of grove owners, irrigation of
commercial and multi -family residential near the S.R. 60 area could be
considered as a secondary option.
i •
i
Central Region: A variety of users are recommended for this region.
Primary users include the Hawk's Nest, Grand. Harbor, Bent Pine, Dodger
I
Pines, Dodgertown and Vero Beach Country Club golf courses. To provide
! additional • reuse capacity, multi -family developments and citrus
irrigation are also proposed. Transmission main lengths could be reduced
in this region if irrigation of . future single-family residential
developments is considered during preliminary facilities design.
SEP X8 1990
North Region: The Sandridge,' Johns Island West, Windsor West (future)
and Pelican Point golf courses and Hobart Park are recommended to serve
as primary reuse sites in this region. It was assumed that if the
proposed Windsor West golf course and polo field (just north of the WWTP)
73
BOOK
8 F �1 U
eJU
SEP 18 1990
BOOK PAGE c..
are not constructed, a similar high reuse capacity facility would be
developed on the site which could serve as a primary user. To meet the
6.0 MGD flows projected by the County for Phase II, irrigation of multi-
family developments and citrus groves is also recommended.
Sea Oaks Region: Three primary users in the Sea Oaks Region -= Sea Oaks
condominiums, Windsor golf course and polo fields, and Orchid golf
course -- are recommended to provide disposal for the Sea Oaks WWTP.
Because flows are comparatively low for this region, the golf courses
will most likely have to supplement their irrigation needs with another
supply in all but the estimated four-month wet season.
The recommended reuse transmission system is illustrated on Figure E-2.
LEGEND
'��
GOLF COURSE
T•sT••
• •
O REGIONAL WWTP
•
t
--. WASTEWATER SERVICE REGIONS
C ���
6 �/~ �
I
— EXISTING TRANSMISSION PSE
�
�
— - TRANSMISSION PIPE - PHASE 1CIL
�� •
\ •��
•
, •
•
TRANSMISSION PIPE - PHASE II
i��/ •
�e°�'M
b
— OPTIONAL INTERCONNECT i��r,•
�b
•�. e
■
e • • e
a
• PIPE TRANSITION POINT
■n
•
�
5
�i�
tl•
QO
r
��
•
•
•
3RQ AM
s SaT .K
• ■
•
,�E•ILAS
•
�
■ :
•
n M
� SBTX AWL
68THaa.-1—T
a
K .
i
.7'"L
7�
•
N
1.•.
•
• • �►
a
Sea arc
C• : avc�t
• •
arc
i• •
ta.T .rc
■
I .
RECOMMENDED REUSE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
(ALT. B)
FIGURE
E-2
74
� i ■
BACKUP DISPOSAL FACILITIES
Facilities are required to back up the recommended reuse system when demands for
reclaimed water are less than average daily flow at the WWTPs -- primarily
during wet weather events. Backup alternatives analyzed included percolation
ponds, man-made wetlands, direct surface water discharge, deep well injection
and storage. Based on an engineering evaluation that considered capital cost,
permittability, and reliability deep well injection was determined to be most
feasible in the South, West, Central and North regions and storage most feasible
in the Sea Oaks Region. Because deep well injection could have strong public
opposition, the County may want to opt for the second ranked alternative. A
summary of the alternatives ranking for each region is presented in Table E-3.
A potential cost saving measure that the County may want to consider during pre-
liminary facilities design is the construction of one backup system for two or
more regions. For example, sharing a deep well between the Central and North
regions could reduce cost since increasing well diameter is generally more cost
effective than construction of two smaller wells. As a less significant cost
saving measure, the County may want to consider utilizing the former Bent Pine
Utilities/Vero Sands Pines parcels !now owned by the County) as percolation
ponds to meet Phase I backup needs, forestalling the need for construction of
additional backup until Phase II; however, more detailed hydrogeological studies
of these sites is needed to verify disposal capacity.
At the conclusion of the Executive Summary, Mr. Morrell
reiterated that their main recommendation is to go with reuse of
wastewater effluent with the backup alternative of deep well
injection.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously ac-cepted
the IRC Effluent Disposal Master Plan prepared by
Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
COMPLETE MASTER PLAN IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
. 75 mor �. F�ticE .��
��P 1 � 199®
BOOK 1 f'N.;;c ` JFt4y
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED COMMISSION — CTC REVIEW EVALUATION
COMMITTEE MEETING
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/10/90:
TO: Board of County DATE: September 10, 1990 FILE:
Commissioners
SUBJECT:' CTC Review Evaluation
Committee Meeting
FROM: Carolyn K. Eggert REFERENCES:
Chairman
As chairperson of the Designated Official Planning Agency
(DOPA) , I or my designee, who must be an elected official', are
required by the Transportation Disadvantaged Committee to attend,
present and defend in person the proposal for the selection of
the Council on 'Aging as Community Transportation Coordinator
(CTC) to the Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) Commission CTC
Evaluation Committee on Tuesday, October 9, 1990.
Since October 9 is scheduled to be the first DCA...
Administrative Hearing, and since Maggy Bowman is head of our-,
Transportation Disadvantaged Committee, I recommend that Maggy`�?r-Ie-
Bowman be our representative and take Arlene Fletcher of the
Council on Aging with her.
Chairman Eggert advised that she would be going to
Tallahassee since Commissioner Bowman has advised that she will
be on vacation during that time.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board by a vote of 4-1,
Commissioner Bowman dissenting, approved out -of -county
travel for Chairman Eggert and a representative from
the Council on Aging to travel to Tallahassee, as
requested by Chairman Eggert in the above memo.
76
W
■
I',
r s �
Commissioner Bowman explained that she voted against the
Motion because she was felt the trip was unnecessary and would
incur an unnecessary expense.
PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Commissioner Bird advised that at the last Parks`&
Recreation. Committee meeting they received a request from the
Airmasters Club, which is a group of model airplane flying
'enthusiasts, for an additional 300 -feet of clear space at the
County Fairgrounds for a clear zone to fly their planes. They
just don't want us to build anything in there that would impede
the landings and take -offs on these model planes. The P & R
Committee doesn't have any problem with that on a temporary
basis. The group is also asking permission to build a temporary
shelter, just a roof structure to provide some shade to work on
their planes, etc. Again, it would be out of the way down at the
south .end .of the Fairgrounds and it is to be of short-range
• o
duration. `
m
Director Davis advised that it is a one-year license
agreement, and Commissioner Bird noted that he had told them that
if the County had a need to build a structure in that area, we
would take it back, and they understood that.
Commissioner Scurlock just didn't want to see our ultimate
plans for the Fairgrounds impeded in any way.
SEP 18 1990
ON MOTION by Commissioner.Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler,•the Board unanimously approved
Commissioner Bird's recommendation for approval of the
Airmasters' request for an additional 300 feet of•clear
space at the County Fairgrounds and permission to build
a temporary roof structure in the southern portion.
77
,A
noK 1 F,?GE ��"J/
t
i
BOOK C:1 ��jj �
FAi;i: c�
FIRE DISTRICT MEETINGS -- SOUTH, NORTH.AND WEST
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment of
this meeting, the Board would reconvene sitting as the District
Board of Commissioners of the various Districts, each meeting to'
be convened immediately after the other adjourns - first, the
North County Fire District, then the South County Fire District,
and l as t l y, the west County Fire District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
• 6
There being no further business, on Motion duly made,
seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:50 o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
Clerk
78
Cha man
:1