HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/18/2014 (4)c.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman District 4
Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman District 1
Joseph E. Flescher District 2
Bob Solari District 5
Tim Zorc District 3
MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
COMMISSION AGENDA
TUESDAY. FEBRUARY 18.2014 - 9:00 A.M.
County Commission Chamber
Indian River County Administration Complex
180127`f' Street, Building A
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388
www.ircgov.com
Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk to the Board
1. CALL TO ORDER 9:00 A.M.
2. INVOCATION The Rev. Fr. Christopher, M. Rodriguez, Rector,
Trinity Episcopal Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS'
5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS
PAGE
A. Presentation of Proclamation in Honor of Harry Hall Upon His Retirement
Effective February 28, 2014 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Proclamation In Recognition of the 125' Anniversary of Florida Public
Health 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February 18, 2014 Page I of 7
5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS PAGE
C. Proclamation NEA's Read Across America
3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Proclamation Honoring African American Pioneer Day February 2014
4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Presentation by The Learning Alliance on Upcoming Moonshot Moment
Event ---
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting of January 21, 2014
7. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT
REQUIRING BOARD ACTION
A. Proclamation and Retirement Award Honoring Maurice A. Lowther on His
Retirement from Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
Department of Emergency Services/Fire Rescue with Twenty-nine Years of
Service 5-6
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. CONSENT AGENDA 'i
A. Approval of Warrants — January 31, 2014 to February 7, 2014
(memorandum dated -February-7,-2-01-4) ---------------------------------------------------------- 7-1-5--
B
ebruary7,_2014)__________________________________________________________7-15_-
B. Final Pay to Flanders — Bid # 2013046/NCRO Plant VFD's Replacement
(memorandum dated February 7,_2014) 16-18
------------------------------------------------------------18
C. 66th Avenue Phase 2 Utility Conflict Resolutions, Final Pay to Carter Assoc.,
Inc., for Work Order No. 2 — UCP 4040
_(memorandum dated January 30, 2014) 19-23
------------------------------------------------------------------
D. South County Regional Park Multi -Purpose Fields Bill of Sale of Utility
Facilities, IRC Project No. 1126, Bid No. 2013009
(memorandum dated February_10, 2014) _________________________________________________ 24-28
------------------------------- - - -
E. Amendment No. 2 for Time Extension of Agreement for Annual
Professional Geotechnical Services RFQ No. 2010021
(memorandum dated January 29, 2014)_______________________________________________ 29-34
-- -
F. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 006
(memorandum dated February_12, 2014)______________________________________________________ 35-37
February 18, 2014 Page 2 of 7
(W 8. CONSENT AGENDA PAGE
G. Resolution Formally Designating a Portion of County Owned Property as
86th Lane Right -of -Way
(memorandum dated February_12, 2014) 38-43-
9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
A. Leslie R. Swan, Indian River County Supervisor of Elections
Report of Several Legislative Changes Regarding the Purchase of New
Voting System
(letter dated February 3, 2014} 44-55
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Please give your name and address, and then give your remarks. Please try to limit your
remarks to three minutes.
1. Request to Speak from Vicki Soule', Treasure Coast Community
Health Regarding Update on TCCH's Community Services 56
2. Request to Speak from Wanda Scott, William Mosley, and Bill
Rigby, Gifford Economic Development Council Regarding
Feedback 57
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Request to Speak from Shawn Frost, The Green Patrol, Regarding
Helping with Green Certification /-Green- HeartAwards ___________________________58
--------------------------------------------- -
1. Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing March 4, 2014
Windsor Properties request for abandonment of a 90' long sliver
(343 sq. ft.) portion of Savannah Drive adjacent to a portion of Lot
1 & Tract A of Block 62 within Windsor Plat 25
(Legislative)
(memorandum_ dated February 7, 2014) --- -- 59
February 18, 2014 Page 3 of 7
10. PUBLIC ITEMS PAGE
C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
2. Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing March 11, 2014
Consideration of an Ordinance to Temporarily Suspend Imposition
of Three Impact Fees for One Year or Until the Current Impact Fee
Review is Completed and a New Impact Fee Schedule is Approved
and Becomes Effective, Whichever Occurs First
(Legislative)
(memorandum_ dated February 5, 2014)_______________________________ 60-61
11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS
None
12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. Communitv Development
1. Request from Staff for Authorization to Initiate an LDR
Amendment to Create Special Overlay Regulations for the West
Gifford Industrial and Commerce (WGIC) Area on 163 Acres of
Property in West Gifford Zoned IG (General Industrial)
_(memorandum_ dated February 3, 2014)____________________________________________ 62-99J
2. Review of INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC's Ad Valorem Tax
Exemption Annual Report
_(memorandum dated February_l0, 2014) _____________________________ _________ 100-116
B.
Emergency Services
None
C.
General Services
None
D.
Human Resources
None
E.
Human Services
None
February 18, 2014 Page 4 of 7
(W 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS PAGE
F. Leisure Services
None
G. Office of Management and Budget
1. Fire Rescue Rolling Stock — Five -Year Replacement Plan
(memorandum_ dated February 12, 2014) 117-121
-----------------------------------------------------
g, Recreation
None
I, Public Works
1. Introduction of Alexis Thomas, Indian River County Stormwater
Education & Enforcement Officer ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Utilities Services
1. Sewer Feasibility Study for the Summerplace Area — Results
(memorandum_ dated January 30, 2014) 122-126
13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS
A. Permission to File Suit for an Injunction against Persistent Code Violator
(memorandum dated February 12, 2014) -- - 127-128
B. Indian River Lagoon Counties Collaborative — Proposed Interlocal
Agreement
(memorandum dated February 11, 2014) 129-140
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman
None
B. Commissioner Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman
None
C. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher
None
February 18, 2014 Page 5 of 7
14. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS PAGE
D. Commissioner Bob Solari
1. Sebastian Equalization Fee
(memorandum_ dated February 10, 2014) 141-142
-----------------------------------------------------
2. Gifford Economics Development Council Inc. (GEDC)
(memorandum_ dated February 11, 2014) ----------------------------------------- 143-144
E. Commissioner Tim Zorc
1. Florida Municipal Power Agency Meetings
(memorandum_ February dated Febry 10, 2014) 145
15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS
A. Emergency Services District
None
B. Solid Waste Disposal District
1. Approval of Minutes Meeting of January 14, 2014
2. Final Pay Geos to tec for Work Order No. 8 for Construction
Yn
Quality Assurance Services for the Rain Flap Removal Project
(memorandum dated February_10, 2014) ----------------------------------------- 146-163.
3. Final Pay for the Third Amendment to Republic Services for the
Rain Flap Removal Project
_(memorandum dated February 10, 2014) 164-175
-------------------------------------------------------------------
C, Environmental Control Board
None
16. ADJOURNMENT
Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board
shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on
the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any
proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to
the public prior to the commencement of the meeting.
February 18, 2014 Page 6 of 7
�d
O
CZD
0 0.
�C
CD
a '21,
p
N
�,D
CDt
C �
;�
�q• O
C
�•
y
z
SCD
CD
o CD
n
O
N
CD
CZD
�C
CD
CD
P� T
p
N
�,D
CDt
CD og,
CD
C�
SCD
CD
o CD
n
O
•S EL
CD
C�
a
CD
Z
�j coo
N
0.
cr
00
CD CD
CD
C
h
CD
CD
�!
CD
Iia.
CL m/
..O
`�
�
a.
�o
�a
5•�
C
`.CD
...
�, I
CD
a@
CDCD
JEFFREY R. SMITH
Clerk to the Board
INDEX TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FEBRUARY 18 2014
1. CALL TO ORDER..........................................................................................................................1
2. INVOCATION................................................................................................................................. 1
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE..........................................................................................................1
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS ................................... 2
MOVE: ITEM S.E. PRESENTATION BY THE LEARNING ALLIANCE ON UPCOMING
MOONSHOT MOMENT EVENT TO COINCIDE WITH ITEM 5.C .......................................2
MOVE: ITEM 14.D.2. GIFFORD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC.
(GEDC) TO COINCIDE WITH ITEM 10.13.2..................................................................2
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS............................................................................ 2
5.A. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF HARRY HALL UPON HIS
RETIREMENT EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 28, 2014...........................................................2
S.B. PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF THE 125TH ANNIVERSARY OF FLORIDA
PUBLICHEALTH......................................................................................................2
5.C. PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION'S (NEA) READ ACROSS
AMERICA................................................................................................................3
February 18, 2014 1
5.D. PROCLAMATION HONORING AFRICAN AMERICAN PIONEER DAY FEBRUARY
2014.......................................................................................................................3
5.E. PRESENTATION BY THE LEARNING ALLIANCE ON UPCOMING MOONSHOT
MOMENTEVENT......................................................................................................4
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES........................................................................................................... 4
6.A. MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 2014...............................................................................4
7. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING
BOARDACTION............................................................................................................................ 5
7.A. PROCLAMATION AND RETIREMENT AWARD HONORING MAURICE A. LOWTHER
ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES/FIRE RESCUE WITH
TWENTY-NINE YEARS OF SERVICE...........................................................................5
8.
CONSENT AGENDA...................................................................................................................
5
8.A.
APPROVAL OF WARRANTS - JANUARY 31, 2014 TO FEBRUARY 7, 2014 ......................5
8.B.
FINAL PAY TO FLANDERS - BID # 2013046/NCRO PLANT VARIABLE
FREQUENCY DRIVE'S (VFD) REPLACEMENT.............................................................6
8.C.
66TH AVENUE PHASE 2 UTILITY CONFLICT RESOLUTIONS, FINAL PAY TO
CARTER ASSOC., INC., FOR WORK ORDER NO. 2 - UCP 4040 ....................................6
8.D.
SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARK MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS BILL OF SALE OF
UTILITY FACILITIES, IRC PROJECT NO. 1126, BID No. 2013009 ................................7
8.E.
AMENDMENT NO. 2 FOR TIME EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL
PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES RFQ NO. 2010021 ....................................7
8.F.
MISCELLANEOUS BUDGET AMENDMENT 006............................................................8
8.G.
RESOLUTION FORMALLY DESIGNATING A PORTION OF COUNTY OWNED
PROPERTY AS 86TH LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY.................................................................
8
9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES ................................. 8
9.A. LESLIE R. SWAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS: REPORT
OF SEVERAL LEGISLATIVE CHANGES REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF NEW
VOTING SYSTEM...................
...................................................................................
February 18, 2014 2
10. PUBLIC ITEMS ---------------------------------------- ----------- -- 9
11. `'-GOUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS - NONE......
13
12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS...................................................................................................
13
IO.A.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE...................................................................................9
13
1O.B.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS...............................................................................9
10.B.1.
REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM VICKI SOULE, TREASURE COAST COMMUNITY
HEALTH, REGARDING UPDATE ON TCCH'S COMMUNITY SERVICES ...........................9
1 O.B.2.
REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM zzT ,, ND A Q!il1TT' WILLIAM MOSLEY, AND BILL
13
12.A.2.
RIGBY, GIFFORD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REGARDING FEEDBACK........
10
10.13.3.
REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM SHAWN FROST, THE GREEN PATROL, REGARDING
16
12.13.
HELPING WITH GREEN CERTIFICATION 1 GREEN HEART AWARDS ............................
1 1
1 O.C.
PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS......................................................................................12
17
10.C.1.
NOTICE OF SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 4, 2014: WINDSOR
17
12.E.
PROPERTIES REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A 90' LONG SLIVER (343
17
SQUARE FOOT) PORTION OF SAVANNAH DRIVE ADJACENT TO A PORTION OF
LOT 1 AND TRACT A OF BLOCK 62 WITHIN WINDSOR PLAT 25 (LEGISLATIVE)........
12
10.0.2.
NOTICE OF SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 11, 2014: CONSIDERATION
OF AN ORDINANCE TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND IMPOSITION OF THREE IMPACT
FEES FOR ONE YEAR OR UNTIL THE CURRENT IMPACT FEE REVIEW IS
COMPLETED AND A NEW IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE IS APPROVED AND BECOMES
EFFECTIVE, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST (LEGISLATIVE) .........................................
12
11. `'-GOUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS - NONE......
13
12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS...................................................................................................
13
12.A.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT..................................................................................
13
12.A.1.
REQUEST FROM STAFF FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE AN LDR AMENDMENT
TO CREATE SPECIAL OVERLAY REGULATIONS FOR THE WEST GIFFORD
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCE (WGIC) AREA ON 163 ACRES OF PROPERTY IN
WEST GIFFORD ZONED IG (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) ................................................
13
12.A.2.
REVIEW OF INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC'S AD VALOREM TAX
EXEMPTION ANNUAL REPORT................................................................................
16
12.13.
EMERGENCY SERVICES - NONE..............................................................................
16
12.C.
GENERAL SERVICES - NONE...................................................................................
17
12.D.
HUMAN RESOURCES - NONE..................................................................................
17
12.E.
HUMAN SERVICES - NONE......................................................................................
17
February 18, 2014 3
12.F. LEISURE SERVICES -NONE.................................................................................... 17
12.G. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET................................................................. 17
12.G.1. FIRE RESCUE ROLLING STOCK - FIVE-YEAR REPLACEMENT PLAN .......................... 17
12.H. RECREATION - NONE............................................................................................. 18
12.I. PUBLIC WORKS..................................................................................................... 19
12.I.1. INTRODUCTION OF ALEXIS THOMAS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY STORMWATER
EDUCATION & ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.................................................................. 19
12.J. UTILITIES SERVICES.............................................................................................. 19
12.J.1. SEWER FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE SUMMERPLACE AREA - RESULTS ................... 19
13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS............................................................................................ 21
13.A. PERMISSION TO FILE SUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION AGAINST PERSISTENT CODE
VIOLATOR............................................................................................................. 21
13.13. INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COUNTIES COLLABORATIVE - PROPOSED INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT.......................................................................................................... 22
14. COMMISSIONER ITEMS............................................................................................................
22
14.A.
COMMISSIONER PETER D. O'BRYAN, CHAIRMAN - NONE........................................22
14.13.
COMMISSIONER WESLEY S. DAVIS, VICE CHAIRMAN - NONE..................................22
14.C.
COMMISSIONER JOSEPH E. FLESCHER - NONE.........................................................22
14.D.
COMMISSIONER BOB SOLARI.................................................................................23
14.D.1.
SEBASTIAN EQUALIZATION FEE.............................................................................23
14.D.2.
GIFFORD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, INC. (GEDC).................................24
14.E.
COMMISSIONER TIM ZORC.....................................................................................24
14.E.1.
FLORIDA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY (FMPA) MEETINGS.....................................24
15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS....................................................................................... 25
15.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT - NONE...............................................................25
15.13. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT.........................................................................25
15.13.1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MEETING OF JANUARY 14, 2014 ........................................26
15.13.2. FINAL PAY TO GEOSYNTEC FOR WORK ORDER NO. 8 FOR CONSTRUCTION
QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES FOR THE RAIN FLAP REMOVAL PROJECT ...............26
15.13.3. FINAL PAY FOR THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO REPUBLIC SERVICES FOR THE RAIN
FLAP REMOVAL PROJECT.......................................................................................26
NJ
February 18, 2014 4
1 S .0 . ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD - NONE........................................................... 26
16. ADJOURNMENT..........................................................................................................................26
February 18, 2014
JEFFREY R. SMITH
Clerk to the Board
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
February 18, 2014
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular
Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on
Tuesday, February 18, 2014. Present were Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman Wesley
S. Davis, and Commissioners Joseph E. Flescher, Bob Solari, and Tim Zorc. Also present were
County Administrator Joseph A. Baird, County Attorney Dylan Reingold, and Deputy Clerk
Leona Adair Allen.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman O'Bryan called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.
2. INVOCATION
Reverend Christopher M. Rodriguez, Rector, Trinity Episcopal Church, delivered the
Invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Flescher led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
February 18, 2014 1
4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Chairman O'Bryan requested the following change(s) to the Agenda:
MOVE: ITEM S.E. PRESENTATION BY THE LEARNING ALLIANCE ON UPCOMING
MOONSHOT MOMENT EVENT TO COINCIDE WITH ITEM 5. C:
MOVE: ITEM 14.D.2. GIFFORD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC.
(GED C) TO COINCIDE WITH ITEM 10.B.2.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Commissioner Zorc, the Board unanimously approved
the Agenda as amended.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
S.A. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF HARRY HALL UPON HIS
RETIREMENT EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 28.2014
Vice Chairman Davis read and presented the Proclamation to Harry Hall in honor of his
retirement.
S.B. PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF THE 125TH ANNIVERSARY OF
FLORIDA PUBLIC HEALTH
Commissioner Solari read and presented the Proclamation to Department of Health
Administrator Miranda Hawker, in recognition of the 125th Anniversary of Florida Public Health.
February 18, 2014 2
F]
5.0 PROCLAMATION- NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION'S (NEA) READ
ACROSS AMERICA
(Clerk's Note: This Item was heard conjointly with Item 5.E., and is placed here for
continuity)
Chairman O'Bryan read and presented the Proclamation to the committee members of
The Learning Alliance (TLA), in recognition of the National Education Association's (NEA)
Read Across America.
S.D. PROCLAMATION HONORING AFRICAN AMERICAN PIONEER DAY
FEBRUARY 2014
Commissioner Flescher read and presented the Proclamation to: (1) Willie Griffieth, the
first African American to be employed as a law enforcement officer in the Indian River Shores
Police Department, and later promoted to Traffic and General Crime Investigator. His first
cousins Sharon Griffieth and Karen Griffieth received the Proclamation on his behalf; (2) Joseph
Brown, the first African American to become a Criminal Justice Academy Coordinator at Indian
River State College; and (3) Alvin R. Thomas, the first African American to serve on the City
Council for the City of Fellsmere.
Joseph Brown thanked the Board and staff for the Proclamation and honor of being
recognized.
Alvin R. Thomas spoke about coming to America from Jamaica, the different jobs he
held, and some of his experiences while serving as the Mayor of Fellsmere.
February 18, 2014 3
S.E. PRESENTATION BY THE LEARNING ALLIANCE ON UPCOMING MOONSHOT
MOMENT EVENT
(Clerk's Note: This Item was heard conjointly with Item 5. C., and is placed here for
continuity)
Maria O'Brien, Learning Alliance, explained the March 3, 2014 "Family Reading
Party" event, known as the Moonshot Moment, that will be held at the Vero Beach High School
Performing Arts Center from 5:00 to 6:45 p.m. She encouraged the public to get involved and
provided their website, www.moonshotmoment.org.
Barbara Hammond, Executive Director of the Learning Alliance, introduced the
collaboration of people working toward the Moonshot Moment goal, and expressed the
importance of children reading by 3rd grade. She revealed that her organization has done so
much work in the last three years, that they received recognition as a national pacesetter from the
Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Vice Chairman Davis requested that the reading event be added to the County's website.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
6.A. MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 2014
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved the meeting minutes of January 21, 2014, as
written.
February 18, 2014 4
7. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS
7.A. PROCLAMATION AND RETIREMENT AWARD HONORING MAURICE A.
LOWTHER ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICESIFIRE
RESCUE WITH TWENTY-NINE YEARS OF SERVICE
Chairman O'Bryan recognized Maurice "Gus" Lowther on his retirement.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
8.A. APPROVAL OF WARRANTS — JANUARY 31, 2014 TO FEBRUARY 7, 2014
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved the list of Warrants and Wires issued by the
Comptroller's Office for the time period of January 31,
2014 to February 7, 2014, as requested in the
memorandum of February 7, 2014.
February 18, 2014 5
8.B. FINAL PAY TO FLANDERS — BID # 20130461INCRO PLANT VARIABLE
FREQUENCYDRIVEIs (VM REPLACEMENT
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved the Final Pay Request to Flanders of Lakeland,
Florida, for the North County Reverse Osmosis Plant
Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) replacement, in the
amount of $55,000.00, as recommended in the
memorandum of February 7, 2014.
8. C. 66TH AVENUE PHASE 2 UTILITY CONFLICT RESOLUTIONS. FINAL PAY TO
CARTER ASSOC., INC., FOR WORK ORDER NO.2 — UCP 4040
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved the Application for Payment No. 14 Final from
Carter Associates, Inc. for Work Order No. 2, in the
amount of $3,304.46, as recommended in the
memorandum of January 30, 2014.
WORK ORDER ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
February 18, 2014 6
8.D. SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARK MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS BILL OF SALE
OF UTILITY FACILITIES, IRC PROJECT NO. 1126, BID No. 2013009
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved the Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities, to transfer
equipment to the Indian River County Utility Services
Department, an enterprise Fund entity, and authorized the
Chairman to execute same for recordation in the Public
Records of Indian River County, Florida, as recommended
in the memorandum of February 10, 2014.
BILL OF SALE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
8.E. AMENDMENT No. 2 FOR TIME EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL
PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES RFQ No. 2010021
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved and authorized the Chairman to execute
Amendment No. 2, for a time extension (September 30,
2014) to the Professional Geotechnical Services
Agreement for the following four (4) firms: Ardaman and
Associates, Inc.; GFA International, Inc.; Dunkelberger
Engineering and Testing, Inc.; and K.S.M. Engineering
and Testing, Inc., as recommended in the memorandum of
January 29, 2014.
AMENDMENTS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
February 18, 2014 7
8.E 11 IISCELLANEOUSBUDGETAMENDmENT 006
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved Resolution 2014-011, amending the Fiscal Year
2013-2014 Budget.
8.G. RESOLUTION FORMALLY DESIGNATING A PORTION OF COUNTY OWNED
PROPERTYAS 86TH LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved Resolution 2014-012, formally designating
4W certain County owned property for 86th Lane right-of-way,
and directing the Property Appraiser to cut out the
property designated as right-of-way from the parent
parcel.
9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCIES
9.A. LESLIE R. SWAN, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS.-
REPORT
LECTIONS.
REPORT OF SEVERAL LEGISLATIVE CHANGES REGARDING THE
PURCHASE OF NEW VOTING SYSTEM
Supervisor of Elections Leslie Swan recalled that she had informed the Board on March
5, 2013, that her office, in accordance with Statute 101.56075, was required to purchase and
implement a new voting system for persons with disabilities by the year 2016; however, by the
conclusion of the 2013 Legislation Session, that mandate was pushed back to 2020. She
February 18, 2014 8
reminded the Board that she had expressed concerns over the current vendor not being able to
provide backup memory cartridges, but last month she received notification that the vendor could
supply them, so she will purchase them with funds from her existing budget. Ms. Swan felt the
postponement would benefit the County since it will allow funds to be put away for the
acquisition of a new voting system after the 2016 Presidential election, and additionally, it will
allow her office to meet the projected equipment needs of the growing number of people in the
County. She also spoke about Electronic Voter Identification (EViD) Poll Books, and how they
are intended to make voter check-in easier and quicker. She said her office plans to budget
money in the next fiscal year to replace the original EViD's that will no longer be able to be
serviced.
Commissioner Zorc suggested Ms. Swan bring the Board a three or four-year plan of her
budget so it could be divided over numerous budget cycles.
10. PUBLIC ITEMS
10.A. PUBLICHEARINGS -NONE
10.B. PUBLICDISCUSSIONITEMS
10.B.1. REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM VICKI SOULE, TREASURE COAST
COMMUNITY HEALTH, REGARDING UPDATE ON TCCII'S COMMUNITY
SERVICES
Vicki Soule, CEO of Treasure Coast Community Health, Inc., provided an update on
Treasure Coast Community Health's (TCCH) mission, community health centers, primary care
services, recent improvements, and community support.
NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN
February 18, 2014 9
fir• lOAZ REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM WAAD,4 SGGi WILLIAM MOSLEY, AND
BILL RIGBY, GIFFORD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL REGARDING
F+'rrnRAcy
(Clerk's Note: Item 14.D.2. was heard in conjunction with this item, and is placed here
for continuity)
Reverend William Mosley believed the Gifford community to be in a state of
emergency regarding the quality of life. He read an excerpt from the 24/7 Wall Street website
regarding the United States having the fourth worst income equality compared to other
developed countries, and spoke about eliminating the wide income gap between the rich and the
poor. He emphasized that in order for the community to grow and move forward, they need jobs,
growth, businesses, improved infrastructure, and economic development. He thereafter
requested the Board to provide him with written answers to questions that were posed in 2013
regarding Gifford issues.
Commissioner Solari requested Mr. Mosley to put his questions in writing so staff can
respond clearly and timely.
There was a brief discussion and debate regarding Gifford representation, endorsement of
Mr. Mosley's product (tablet holder), and commitment.
Chairman O'Bryan said he would request staff to review the 5 -Year Capital Improvement
Element and pull any projects relating to Gifford, and provide a summary of all community
meetings held in the Gifford community over the past nine months.
Bill Rigby, 8465 59th Avenue, emphasized that he was in attendance today to discuss
economic issues, not the trash business. He stressed the need for growth in Gifford and believed
that if everyone works together, the Gifford community can move forward with improvement.
February 18, 2014 10
Commissioner Solari said that he had met with Mr. Mosley and members of the Gifford
community on February 12, 2014 to discuss the Gifford Economic Development Council, Inc.
(GEDC). He felt there was still a lot of misinformation in the community regarding the proper
functions of County Government, as opposed to different Government Agencies, and reiterated
that he would be glad to return to Gifford to continue discussions on a regular basis. He also
noted that he had taken a list of questions to the GEDC meeting, and thought it would be
reasonable to ask basic financial and organizational questions of leadership, and believed it
would be appropriate to ask questions similar to those that would be asked of any nonprofit
seeking financial support from County government. He agreed that individuals need to work
together and get a better grasp on the information out there to succeed.
10.B.3. BE UEST TO SPEAK FROM SHAWN FROST, THE GREEN PATROL,
REGARDING HELPING WITH GREEN CERTIFICATION 1 GREEN HEART
A wARDs
Shawn R. Frost, founder and CEO of the Green Patrol, recalled that at the February 11,
2014 Solid Waste Disposal District meeting, Jeremy Nelson had provided a brief overview of the
Florida Green Building Coalition (FGBC) and the ways in which the Coalition can help counties
achieve the green government standard, and he wanted to know what the Board's decision was
for recertification.
Vice Chairman O'Bryan informed Mr. Frost that the item had been tabled, and that Mr.
Nelson, or a FGBC representative, would be returning to the Board with additional information
regarding the benefits to the County for recertifying with the FGBC. He admitted that the Board
did not feel they could justify spending taxpayers' dollars on recertification to maintain the
County's Green Local Government status.
Mr. Frost said that he wanted to offer a service through the Green Patrol
(thegreenpatrol.org) that would require no tax dollars, create jobs that would help keep Indian
River County clean, focus on cleaning the Lagoon, boost the economy, and provide funding to
February 18, 2014 11
,► pursue the green certification. He said his plan would include three paid certified inspectors and
19 volunteer certified inspectors to help "green up" local businesses, as well as the County. He
plans to start hiring and training on March 3rd, and will be recognizing nonprofits, for -profits,
and individuals who do well on the Saturday before Earth Day.
Commissioner Flescher commended Mr. Frost on his approach, and said he was
encouraged by the possible benefits for the business community, local government, and citizens.
He also confirmed with Mr. Frost that his business had converted from a nonprofit to a profit
organization.
NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN
10. C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS
MCI. NOTICE OF SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 4,2014: WINDSOR
PROPERTIES REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT OF A 90' LONG SLIVER (343
SQUARE FOOT) PORTION OF SAVANNAH DRIVE ADJACENT TO A PORTION
OF LOT 1 AND TRACT A OF BLOCK 62 WITHIN WINDSOR PLAT 25
(LEGISLATIVE)
10.C.2. NOTICE OF SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 11, 2014:
CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO TEMPORARILY SUSPEND
IMPOSITION OF THREE IMPACT FEES FOR ONE YEAR OR UNTIL THE
CURRENT IMPACT FEE REVIEW IS COMPLETED AND A NEW IMPACT FEE
SCHEDULE_ IS APPROVED AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE, WHICHEVER
OCCURS FIRST (LEGISLATIVE)
County Attorney Dylan Reingold read the notices into the record.
February 18, 2014 12
The Chairman called for a break at 10:46 a.m., and reconvened the meeting at 10:56
a.m., with all members present.
11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS - NONE
12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
12.A. COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT
12 A 1 REQUEST FROM STAFF FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE AN LDR
AMENDMENT TO CREATE SPECIAL OVERLAY REGULATIONS FOR THE
WEST GIFFORD INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCE (WGIC) AREA oN 163
ACRES OF PROPERTY IN WEST GIFFORD ZONED IG (GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL)
Community Development Director Stan Boling recapped his memorandum dated
February 3, 2014, providing background, conditions, and analysis pertaining to staff's request for
authorization to: (1) update the draft overlay regulations for the West Gifford Industrial and
Commerce (WGIC) area (163 acres bordered by 43rd Avenue on the east, 58th Avenue on the
west, 45th Street on the north, and 41" Street on the south), which is zoned as General Industrial
(IG); and (2) initiate the formal process for adopting the draft regulations. He recommended the
Board authorize staff to initiate a Land Development Regulation (LDR) Amendment for the
WGIC overlay regulations (as opposed to a rezoning approach), invoke the pending ordinance
doctrine, and direct staff to apply the draft regulations in the interim.
A lengthy discussion ensued as Commissioners posed questions to staff and expressed
opinions on the soundness of the pending ordinance doctrine; the criteria proposed for the three
special exception uses (batch plants, mulch operations, and demolition debris facilities) in West
Gifford's IG zoned property; the requirements for IG and Light Industrial (IL) zoning; and
grandfathering uses.
February 18, 2014 13
Chairman O'Bryan reiterated that currently the demolition debris site and the concrete
batch plants have permitted rights, and at today's meeting, the Board is not adding these uses to
the Gifford area, they are considering changing them from permitted to special exception uses,
which requires a public notice process, a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning
Commission, and a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, which allows
more public input.
Chairman O'Bryan opened the floor to public comments.
The following individuals spoke in support of staff's recommendation to create
special WGIC overlay regulations:
Joe Idlette III, 4570 57th Avenue, and President of the Progressive Civic League of
Gifford, FL, Inc.
Freddie Woolfork, 4590 57th Avenue
Jack Stiefel, 634 Centre Court SW
Charles Brimmer, Amelia Plantation Court
Crystal Boujol, 8 Vista Garden Trails
Marcy Oppenheimer Nolan, Becker and Poliakoff Law Firm, representing the
Progressive Civic League of Gifford
John Marr, Tulip Lane
Dan Lamson, Executive Director of the Indian River County Neighborhood Association
Tony Esposito, 4635 45th Street
Andy Bowler, representing Indian River Habitat for Humanity
Keith Tagg, Mr. Scrap, Inc., 4455 45th Street
Teri Potts, 4255 Amelia Plantation Court
William Mosley, Gifford Economic Development Council
February 18, 2014 14
The following individuals spoke in opposition to staff's recommendation to create
special WGIC overlay regulations:
Kathleen Jaskolski, 5211 Eleuthra Circle
Anthony Brown, 4159 57" Court
Julianne Price, address not provided
Charles Vogt, address not provided
Russell Payne, owner of Mr. Mulch, 5420 41St Street
Benny Rhyant, 1312 14th Place, President of the Indian River County Pastor Association
Althea McKenzie, 2405 16th Avenue
Cynthia Spann, 4575 33rd Avenue
Jeff Thompson, Vero Millwork, Inc.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Flescher,
SECONDED by Commissioner Solari, to direct staff to:
(1) initiate the formal process of amending the Land
Development Regulations (LDRs) to create the West
Gifford Industrial and Commerce (WGIC) overlay
regulations; (2) invoke the pending ordinance doctrine;
and (3) apply the draft WGIC overlay regulations to
development applications until final regulations are
formally adopted.
Following the lengthy discussion, Commissioners expressed their views over staff's
proposal; protecting the business community; and finding a balance for landscaping
improvements.
Chairman O'Bryan voiced his opposition to the Motion, preferring to bar concrete plants
and demolition debris facilities from Gifford.
February 18, 2014 15
A
Director Boling reiterated that this item is not an adoption hearing. He voiced concerns
over mulch hard -bottom floors in the Best Management Practices (BMP) guidelines; stated that
the existing junk yards along 45th Street need to upgrade, replace, or hide their broken fences;
and noted that staff would return to the Board with cost information for beautification projects.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and by a 4-1
vote (Chairman O'Bryan opposed), the Motion carried.
The Chairman called for a break at 1:49 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 2:15 p.m.,
with all members present.
12.A.2. REVIEW OF INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC's AD VALOREM
TAX EXEMPTIONANNUAL REPORT
Director Boling reviewed his memorandum dated February 10, 2014, presenting INEOS
New Planet BioEnergy LLC's (INEOS) request to continue with its economic development ad
valorem tax exemption requirements. He said that after review of the INEOS January 2014
annual report, staff found that INEOS's 2013 performance scored the same number of points
under the County's scoring guidelines, as scored on its 2011 tax abatement application, and
therefore asked the Board to find INEOS in compliance with the tax abatement requirements.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Solari, SECONDED by
Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously found that
INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC is currently in
compliance with its ad valorem tax exemption
requirements, as recommended in the memorandum of
February 10, 2014.
12.B. EMERGENCYSER VICES -NONE
February 18, 2014
16
12. G GENERAL SERVICES - NONE
12.D. HUMANRESOURCES - NONE
12.E. HUMANSERVICES -NONE
12.F. .LEISURE SERVICES - NONE
1ZG. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
12. G. L FIRE RESCUE ROLLING STOCK— FIVE-YEAR REPLACEMENT PLAN
(Clerk's Note: This item was heard following Item 13.A., and is placed here for
continuity)
Management and Budget Director Jason Brown recalled the discussion from the February
11, 2014 Board of County Commission meeting whereby staff was directed to provide an update
on the Fire Rescue fleet, and a five-year plan to catch up on scheduled replacements of vehicles
for the District. He reviewed the details of the Fire Rescue's ambulance fleet, rescue engine
fleet, and the projected five-year replacement schedule. He requested the Board to approve the
funding plan in concept and authorize a budget amendment from Optional Sales Tax for three
replacement ambulances.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Flescher,
SECONDED by Commissioner Solari, to approve staff s
recommendation.
Discussion ensued regarding funding options; lead time delays for ordering parts and
vehicles; additional fire stations; and staff having applied for a Federal Grant.
February 18, 2014 17
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the
Motion carried unanimously. The Board: (1) approved in
concept the projected Five -Year Plan for the replacement
of front line fire rescue vehicles; (2) a Budget Amendment
in the amount of $700,000 from Optional Sales Tax
Reserves for the purchase of three (3) replacement
ambulances; and (3) additional capital necessary to
provide Fire Rescue Services for the current fiscal year, all
as recommended in the memorandum of February 12,
2014.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Zorc to direct
staff to purchase four (4) defibrillator units, using District
Funds. MOTION DIED for lack of a Second.
Administrator Baird advised that four defibrillator units would cost about $120,000.
Commissioner Solari suggested this item be tabled to the next Board of County
Commission meeting so it can be properly noticed.
Staff agreed, and Commissioner Zorc withdrew his motion.
12.H. RECREATION= NONE
February 18, 2014 18
12L PUBLIC WORDS
1211 INTRODUCTION OF ALEXIS THOMAS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
aJTORMWATER EDUCATION & ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
Public Works Director Chris Mora introduced new employee Alexis Thomas, an
Environmental Scientist, who will be working as the Indian River County Stormwater Education
and Enforcement Officer. He said she will be educating the public on the components of the new
Fertilizer Ordinance, and also handle enforcement.
Alexis Thomas described her background and education, and expressed her enthusiasm in
helping to restore the estuary, educate the public, and enforce the Fertilizer Ordinance.
Chairman O'Bryan requested that in addition to her regular duties, she assist the
Environmental Learning Center (ELC) with their programs, and undertake the job of touring
certain groups throughout the County to show them some of the County's projects.
12J. UTILITIES SERVICES
12..1.1. SEWER FEASIBILITYSTUDY FOR THE SUMMERPLACE AREA —RESULTS
(Clerk's Note: This Item was heard following Item 14.D. L, and is placed here for
continuity)
Director of Utility Services Vincent Burke recalled the Board's approval on August 20,
2013, for a Feasibility Study to provide professional services to investigate the feasibility of
installing centralized sewer services. Using a Prezi presentation (copy on file), he provided
description and analysis of the three types of sewer collection systems (gravity based, vacuum,
and low pressure) that could be used in the Summerplace area, and the cost for each. He said the
results of the study showed the vacuum alternative to be the preferred method for a centralized
sewer system, but the Utility Department prefers the gravity based system. He used a
February 18, 2014 19
construction schematic in his presentation to show the proposal for 52 gravity based systems in
the southeast portion of Summerplace, and 217 vacuum systems in the west, for a total of 264
residential parcels. He recommended the Board approve moving forward with the vacuum based
system in the west, and a hybrid gravity based system in the southeast corner to tie into the
existing lift station. He also asked that the information be added to the County's website.
Chairman O'Bryan questioned the STEP (Septic Tank and Effluent Pump) system, and
whether it had been evaluated.
Joseph Schulke, Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, LLC, said his scope was limited so he did
not price out a STEP system. He discussed the items that had been considered, explained his
research, and noted that at least half of the septic tanks in Summerplace were built prior to 1483,
which means they are substandard in size (750 gallons), and for the STEP system to work, they
need to be at least 1,000 gallons. He also pointed out that the Environmental Protection
Agency's manuals recommend replacing the entire septic tank, which would increase prices
substantially.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Flescher, the Board unanimously
authorized: (1) staff to determine the next phase;
(2) staff to present the findings to the Summerplace Home
Owners Association; and (3) staff to publish both
Feasibility Studies on the County's website, as
recommended in the memorandum of January 30, 2014.
The Chairman called for a break at 3:21 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 3:30 p.m.,
with all members present.
February 18, 2014 20
13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS
B.A. PERMISSION TO FILE SUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION AGAINST PERSISTENT
CODE VIOLATOR
(Clerk's Note: This item was heard following Item 12.A.2. and is placed here for
continuity)
Attorney Reingold provided background regarding a consistent violator (William
Ruetemann) who has been operating a boat repair business in his back yard. He disclosed staff's
many attempts to bring this item to the Code Enforcement Board, and said that staff is now
seeking permission from the Board to go to Court, seek an injunction, and obtain a definitive
ruling on this issue.
Helen Curtis, 8131 135th Street, Roseland, representing herself and her neighbors,
conveyed that Mr. Ructemann engages in vessel repair in his back yard, which entails sanding,
fiberglassing, painting, and overall construction of vessels. She noted that this activity should be
conducted in an enclosed structure with specific designed air ventilation, and protective clothing.
She complained about the noise, contaminated air, and health issues. She reported that she and
her neighbors have been working with Code Enforcement to stop Mr. Ruetemann's activities, but
now they are seeking Board assistance.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Solari, SECONDED by
Commissioner Flescher, the Board unanimously
authorized the County Attorney's Office to file suit in
Circuit Court for injunctive relief, asking the Court to
force Mr. Ruetemann to cease and desist the unauthorized
boat repair business, and to stop storing boats on his
property that are not registered to him, as recommended in
the memorandum of February 12, 2014.
February 18, 2014 21
13.B. INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COUNTIES COLLABORATIVE — PROPOSED
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Attorney Reingold provided background regarding the creation of the Interlocal
Agreement for the Indian River Lagoon Counties Collaborative, which consists of bylaws and a
document that formally recognizes the Collaborative with a sunset provision. He requested that
the Board review and approve the Agreement before it is presented to the governing bodies of
the various Collaborative members for their approval.
ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Flescher, the Board unanimously approved
the Interlocal Agreement with the various other County
members of the Indian River Lagoon Counties
Collaborative (Volusia, Brevard, Indian River, St. Lucie,
�r and Martin Counties), and authorized the Chairman to
A
execute it on behalf of the Board, as recommended in the
memorandum of February 11, 2014.
AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
14. COMMISSIONER ITEMS
14.A. COMMISSIONER PETER D. 0 T RYAN, CHAIRMAN- NONE
14.B. COMMISSIONER WESLEY S. DAVIS, VICE CHAIRMAN- NONE
14. C. COMMISSIONER JOSEPH E. FLESCHER - NONE
February 18, 2014 22
14.D. COMMISSIQNER BOB SoLARi
14.D.1. SEBASTIANEQUALIZATIONFEE
(Clerk's Note: This Item was heard following Item 12.1.1., and is placed here for
continuity)
Commissioner Solari read his memorandum dated February 10, 2014, regarding the
County's purchase of Sebastian's water and sewer utility system in 1995, it being consolidated
into the County's system, and because Sebastian's debt was assumed, the County began billing
Sebastian customers an "equalization charge." He believed that after many years of the County
charging the fee, the charge has equalized between the County and Sebastian customers. He
found no justification for the continuation of this charge, and felt all citizens in the County
should be treated fairly.
Administrator Baird provided history on the equalization charge, and said it is a policy J
decision for the Board.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Solari,
SECONDED by Vice Chairman Davis, to direct the
County Administrator to eliminate the Sebastian
equalization charge, which currently appears on Sebastian
water and sewer bills.
Discussion and debate ensued regarding the 6% equalization charge for non -incorporated
area customers; and the reduction of about $200,000 in revenue to the County's General Fund if
the fee is eliminated.
Chairman O'Bryan wanted to know what the effective date would be.
9
February 18, 2014 23
C C-1
co
9�
-0
t co
0
=r
U)
(D
(D
70
701
0
Cr
C/)
CD
(n
(D
(D
-n
0
a)
=r
0
(D
l<
CD CL
z a
-n
c)
CL
A. ;o 0
ll) ID
CD
(n
0
0
C)
ac 0
QL
0
<
OL)
:3
- < -n
m 0
< =
7,
— =r
<
_0
0
_0
Cf)
0
CD CD
(1)
c
Oz
::p 2
=37 -1
::p (D
CD
CD
c
Z
CD
CL —
3 m
"
0- m
F), CD m
w
"1 0
o
cn x
0
-n
(D 0
(A
D su
- , Q- co
cn 0
=r fA
(D
3
cn
c
=3
0 -
ID
(D
cn -
D
w -
= 0
cn
CD
M. CA ;a
l< C-)
0
a) 0
-7 :3
DQ
0
QOM
-
3 0
o
00
-
z
cn 3
=T -0
o
3
o 3
3
-10
-o 3
" -0
m
=3
0
cor
CD
-n
0- 3-6
(n
0
;u w 0
z o
9�
(D
—
5'
CL
0
=r
:3
C)
<
0
M C
a)
(n
cr CD
CD
=7
CD CL
CD
c)
CL
ll) ID
C)
ac 0
QL
0
0
0
C: C)
< =
w 0- =r
— =r
0 cf)
(D
0 CD =r
C- C:
_0
Cf)
0
CD CD
(1)
CL CD
(D
::p 2
=37 -1
::p (D
CD
CD
CD 0-
CD
CL —
3 m
"
0- m
F), CD m
w
CD
cn x
0
(D 0
(A
D su
- , Q- co
cn 0
=r fA
(D
3
=T =r M
CD cD
c
=3
0 -
ID
(D
cn -
D
w -
= 0
(D
CD
M. CA ;a
l< C-)
0
a) 0
-7 :3
CL
0
0
QOM
-
3 0
o
00
-
0 cn M
0 — -n
00
cn 3
=T -0
o
3
o 3
3
-10
-o 3
" -0
3
-0
=3
0
cor
CD
-n
0- 3-6
cr
0 -"
(D
<
CD
=r "
0
M
0
0
CD 0
— —
CD 0
—.0
m
U� CD
=
zT (D
0
70.
0
CD
0
+1
(D Cl) 00
0
=:g 2:
0
D
(D
-0
<
-D
(n
C: 0M
w
T
gni
0
CD
CT
-n
—
(D
w
—
0
Ln.
=r
Z
:3
1-4..
0
=r
W
CD W
=r
CD -r
M
U) 0
cr
CDS
:D
(n
cr
cn
cn
0 > 0
(n 3 z
(D
0-
w CD
:3 -,
W CD
CD
W
M :3
:3
cn :T
0
_0
'. ;o >
(D
< (D
CLCD
=5
0 :3
�T
Q- CD
—
w
(n
-N
0
m 0
U)
U)
CD z)
cn
=r -j
CD CD
=) M
Z) X
(D
CD CT
0 m m
Nn O
CD
0-
C/)
C
0 3
0 cr
0 m
0 U)
CD
cr CD
o 03
0-
l<
(n "D
0
3 CD
< <
(D
.
<
=r (D
0 w 0
W -n
zT
CD 0
;:I_
3 (D
c
-% c
w
CD
(n
=r
CD
n C-1
CD
Z
m
cn
<
CD
Z) w
(n
0-
CD
::r 0
0
-n
Ep <
CD
(n
0
cr
(D
CD
(J)
z
-n a
o-
CD. =r
C
CDS
CL
(a
CL CD
w
crr"—
cn 0Z
w
:3-1
cc cn
0
—
0 0
m
(n X z
=r 3 ;o
:D
cl
w 0
0
0
0
:0
CD
3
CD CD
CD 3
8- >
0
< 0
CL
CL
CD (D
(D 07
3 CD -+ m
u
5 . ,
x
CD
1
3 c:
-% CD
0
0 w
ohm
Co
C.0
CC (D
c
cn
-q-
CL
CD CO
=3 0
--%
=r 0
W =rO
CD
(n
CD
o CD
CD 0-
CD CD
>
0 >
;o
(n
CL w
:3
cn
w
CL
cn
co CD
c —
CL C) a
w
w 0 c-
0
0 CL
<
0 0
0
(n
CD 0
-n
ZY
W
=r (n
0
(D
=r (n
N)
co
CD
(a (n
(D -i
CD to
Administrator Baird said he would bring this back to the Board after the Utility
Department has had a chance to make programming changes.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 4-1
vote (Chairman O'Bryan opposed), the Motion carried
Attorney Reingold noted that in 1995, the Board had adopted Resolution 95-16, which
established the 6% equalization rate, and said his office would draft a resolution stating that the
rate equalization charge is no longer necessary, and bring it back to the Board in March.
14.D.2. GIFFORD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, INC. (GEDC)
(Clerk's Note: This Item was heard in conjunction with Item 10.B.2. and is placed here
for continuity. See Item 10.B.2. for discussion.)
14.E. COMMISSIONER TIMZORC
14.E. L FLORIDA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY (FMPA) MEETINGS
Commissioner Zorc shared his belief that there is an intrinsic value to being present at the
Florida Municipal Power Agency (FMPA) meetings, especially now that negotiations are starting
to move forward. He thinks that having a Commissioner in attendance will show unity and
concern with negotiations.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Solari,
SECONDED by Vice Chairman Davis, to appoint
Commissioner Zorc as the primary designee to the Florida
Municipal Power Agency (FMPA) meetings held in
Orlando.
February 18, 2014 24
MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner Solari to
appoint Vice Chairman Davis as the alternate liaison to the
Florida Municipal Power Agency (FMPA). MOTION
DIED for lack of a Second.
Vice Chairman Davis said that instead of appointing an alternate, he would prefer to
authorize travel to send an alternate to Orlando when Commissioner Zorc cannot attend.
Chairman O'Bryan confirmed with Attorney Reingold that there would be no Sunshine
issues if the Board approves travel for any Commissioner to go to a FMPA meeting in the event
that Commissioner Zorc cannot attend.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the
Motion carried unanimously. The Board (1) appointed
Commissioner Zorc as the primary designee to attend the
Florida Municipal Power Agency (FMPA) meetings in
Orlando; and (2) authorized any County Commissioner to
attend the Florida Municipal Power Agency meeting in
Commissioner Zorc's absence.
15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS
15.A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT- NONE
15A SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Board reconvened as the Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste District.
Those Minutes are available separately.
February 18, 2014 25
1 S.B.I. _ . APPROVAL OF MINUTES MEETING OF JANUARY 14, 2014
15A2. FINAL PAY TO GEOSYNTEC FOR WORK ORDER NO. 8 FOR
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES FOR THE RAIN FLAP
REMOVAL PROJECT
I5.B.3. FINAL PAY FOR THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO REPUBLIC SERVICES FOR
THE RAIN FLAP REMOVAL PROJECT
15. C. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD - NONE
ALL BACKUP DOCUMENTATION, RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AND ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES
16. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Chairman declared the meeting adjourned at
3:37 p.m.
Jeffrey R. Smith, CPA, CGFO, CGMA
Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller
,ten
BCCILA/2014Minutes
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman
Approved:
February 18, 2014 26
APR 0 1 2014
JEFFREY R. SMITH
Clerk to the Board
February 18, 2014
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
MEETING MINUTES
The Board of Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) met at the
County Commission Chambers, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, February 18,
2014. Present were Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis, and
Commissioners Joseph E. Flescher, Bob Solari, and Tim Zorc. Also present were County
Administrator Joseph A. Baird, County Attorney Dylan Reingold, and Deputy Clerk Leona Adair
Allen.
Chairman O'Bryan called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m.
15A APPROVAL OF MINUTES —MEETING OF JANUARY 14, 2014
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved the minutes of the Solid Waste Disposal District
meeting of January 14, 2014, as written.
February 18, 2014 1
Solid Waste Disposal District
I5AZ FINAL PAY TO GEOSYNTEC FOR WORK ORDER NO.8 FOR
CONSTRUCTION QUALITYASSURANCE SERVICES FOR THE RAIN
FLAP REMOVAL PROJECT
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved Geosyntec Consultants' final invoice for Work
Order No. 8, Segment 3 Landfill Lateral Expansion - Rain
Flap Removal Project, in the amount of $460.49, as
recommended in the memorandum of February 10, 2014.
15.B.3. FINAL PAY FOR THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO REPUBLIC
SERVICES FOR THE RAIN FLAP REMOVAL PROJECT
ON MOTION by Commissioner Flescher, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously
approved Republic Services' final invoice for the Third
Amendment, Segment 3 Landfill Lateral Expansion —
Rain Flap Removal Project, in the amount of $18,837.50,
as recommended in the memorandum of February 10,
2014.
ALL BACKUP DOCUMENTATION, RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AND ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES
February 18, 2014 2
Solid Waste Disposal District
There being no further business, the Chairman declared the Solid Waste Disposal District
meeting adjourned at 3:36 p.m.
ATTEST:
uglil i/
Jeffrey R. Smith, CPA, CGFO, CGMA
Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller
February 18, 2014 3
Solid Waste Disposal District
9CQ&�r�-
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman
Approved: APR 0 8 2014
PROCLAMATION 6-6
In Recognition of the 125`h Anniversary of Florida Public Health
WHEREAS, the yellow fever epidemic that occurred n Florida during 1887-1888
brought to light the need for control of this and other diseases in Florida to prevent future
epidemics-, and
WHEREAS, in response to this need, the Florida Legislature created the State Board of
Health on February 20, 1889; and
WHEREAS, the State Board of Health, now named the Florida Department of Health,
has a presence in all Florida counties to protect, promote, and improve the health of all
people in Florida-, and
WHEREAS, the efforts of the Florida Department of Health have helped create healthier
living environments and a better quality of life for the residents and visitors in Indian River
County-, and
WHEREAS, the dedicated public health professionals who work for the Florida
Department of Health in Indian River County continue to serve the needs of our community
by providing health services, monitoring and responding to emerging health threats, and
promoting healthy choices for all who live, work, and play in Indian River County-,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board hereby recognizes
the 125th Anniversary of Florida Public Health, and ask that all residents join us in
extending our sincere gratitude to the staff, past and present, of the Florida Department of
Health in Indian River County County for their commitment to the people of our communities
during these one hundred and twenty-five years.
Adopted this 18th day of February, 2014.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
IN�IAI� RI ER COUNTY, F'ORIDA
CD Pete O'Bryan, Chairman
"Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman
Bob Solari
sep E. F escher
Ti or
SC
PROCLAMATION
NEA'S READ ACROSS AMERICA
WHEREAS, the citizen's of Indian River County, Florida stand firmly committed to promoting
reading as the catalyst for our students' future academic success, their preparation for America's
jobs of the future, and their ability to compete in a global economy; and
WHEREAS, the Moonshot Moment community members and School District have provided
significant leadership in the area of community involvement in the education of our youth, grounded
in the principle that educational investment is key to the community's well being and long-term quality
of life; and
WHEREAS, "NEA's" Read Across America," a national celebration of Dr. Seuss' 110th
Birthday on March 3, 2014, promotes reading and adult involvement in the education of our
community's students.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board calls on the citizens of
Indian River County to assure that every child is in a safe place reading together with a caring adult
on March 3, 2014; and
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED, that the Board enthusiastically endorses "NEA's Read
Across America" and recommits our community to engage in programs and activities to make
America's children the best readers in the world.
Adopted this 18th day of February, 2014.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ERCO -- Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman'
►.� Wesley S. Davis Vice Chairman
eoh . Flescher
1111111111171
Bob Solari
PROCLAMATION SD
HONORING AFRICAN AMERICAN PIONEER DAY
FEBRUARY, 2014
WHEREAS, since the 1940's several prominent African American men and women of Indian
River County have paved the way for this generation and many to come to serve in the business, public
and elected arenas; and
WHEREAS, in 1983 Willie Griffieth was the first African American to be employed as a law
enforcement officer in the Indian River Shores Police Department. In 1984, when the Police and Fire
Departments were consolidated into the Indian River Shores Public Safety, Officer Willie Griffieth was
promoted to Traffic and General Crime Investigator. He was the first African American to hold this
position; and
WHEREAS, in September, 2004, Joseph Brown was the first African American to become a
Criminal Justice Academy Coordinator at Indian River State College and is currently serving in that
capacity; and
WHEREAS, Alvin R. Thomas from Jamaica West Indies was the first African American to serve
on the City Council for the City of Fellsmere. In December, 1978, Alvin was appointed to City Council
and served until 1982, when he ran for and successfully won election to the Council; he was named
interim Mayor in 1982, then ran for and was elected Mayor in 1983 and served until 1985. In 1989 he
was re -appointed to the City Council to fill the un -expired term of Joe Washington, another African
American who passed in 1989; in 1990 he was again elected as a Councilmember and was selected by
the City Council as Mayor Pro -Tem and served until 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that this proclamation signifies the historic accomplishments of
these noble pioneers in civil rights, education, public service, business and elected office, will be forever
remembered as builders to the African American's generations to come; and
LET IT FURTHER BE PROCLAIMED, that the month of February be forever known in Indian
River County as African American Pioneer Day.
Adopted this 18th day of February, 2014.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
I N RIVER COUI TY, FLORIDA
Peter D. O' Bryan, Chairma
i
Wesley S. Davis, ice hairman
_a�� Z--"/
J eph E. Flescher
Bob Solari
Ti
HAI
HONORING MA URICE "GUS" L O WTHER ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SER VICESIFIRE RESCUE
WHEREAS, Gus Lowther is retiring from Indian River County Fire Rescue effective
February 28, 2014, and
WHEREAS, Gus Lowther began his firefighting career with Indian River County on July 7,
1984, as a Fireflghter/EMT. On September 28, 1990, he was promoted to Engineer with
Indian River County Fire Rescue. He continued in this capacity until his retirement, and
WHEREAS, Gus Lowther has served this County and the Public with distinction and
selflessness. During his twenty-nine years of service, he was dedicated and his work was
greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens, and co-workers alike; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Gus
Lowther's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation
for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River Countyfor the last twenty-nine years;
and
BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend
heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors.
Adopted this 18th day of February 2014
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIANRIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
l ' .�ORIO� ALJ
Peter D. O'Bryan, irmjA
V
7
I
1
'qfiif
if to certib thata
a
t{
}
jj /
IA=
r /
t
i�
l
1
I fI r
is / J6presented
!
}
1
I
/ 1 / r t
7
j
it�
I:
*�for
outstand. ig petfonnance and
iS
l�
1
faitfifulservice
1
Indian
i
k
}
Boardof County Commissiners
1
Tor twenty-nine years
It
%
8 !
On this r r t / r ry
t
3
a
1 ' /
1}�
,
/
ys +Eme"qSenwes (Boardof County(Bo/of+ s Cfiainnan!�
t
� /ilii.% �._ ri% Iii.= �A �% �► �- 1�
JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA
Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller
Finance Department
1801 27`h Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIREC
THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER
DATE: February 7, 2014
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS
January 31, 2014 to February 7, 2014
► . C C
4J`s►you +r�`
0
R � p
�"%sa.a ►rltF
In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic
payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board
minutes.
Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the
time period of January 31, 2014 to February 7, 2014.
Attachment:
7
CHECKS WKl'FIEN
CHECK NBR
CK DATE
VENDOR
AMOUNT
308223
2/3/2014
CHERYL DOYLE
377.00
308224
2/3/2014
GRACES LANDING LTD
1,335.00
308225
2/3/2014
LINDSEY GARDENS APARTMENTS
2,300.00
308226
2/3/2014
RIVER PARK ASSOCIATES
306.00
308227
2/3/2014
CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD
990.00
308228
2/3/2014
TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES
383.00
308229
2/3/2014
PINNACLE GROVE LTD
630.00
308230
2/3/2014
VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD
2,906.00
308231
2/3/2014
THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH
2,208.00
308232
2/3/2014
PELICAN ISLES LP
1,264.00
308233
2/3/2014
GHOLAMREZA TORKAMAN
739.00
308234
2/3/2014
INDIAN RIVER RDA LP
484.00
308235
2/3/2014
AHS HOLDINGS GROUP LLC
1,339.00
308236
2/3/2014
DANIEL CORY MARTIN
1,035.00
308237
2/3/2014
ALCURT VERO BEACH LLC
3,547.00
308238
2/3/2014
WANELL DONNELLI
436.00
308239
2/3/2014
ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING & C D
1,807.28
308240
2/3/2014
ALL FLORIDA REALTY SERVICES INC
4,857.00
308241
2/3/2014
GERALD T CAPAK
260.00
308242
2/3/2014
CHERYL DOYLE
855.00
308243
2/3/2014
VERO BEACH EDGEWOOD PLACE (305-113)
658.00
308244
2/3/2014
GRACES LANDING LTD
8,756.00
308245
2/3/2014
MICHAEL JACKOWSKI
430.00
308246
2/3/2014
TERRY A LAWRENCE
62.00
308247
2/3/2014
LINDSEY GARDENS APARTMENTS
10,610.00
308248
2/3/2014
LINDSEY GARDENS APARTMENTS
1,085.00
308249
2/3/2014
BRYAN D BLAIS
1,187.00
308250
2/3/2014
RIVER PARK ASSOCIATES
15,885.00
308251
2/3/2014
RICHARD C THERIEN
477.00
308252
2/3/2014
CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD
2,946.00
308253
2/3/2014
DAVID YORK
526.00
308254
2/3/2014
ST FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACH
635.00
308255
2/3/2014
CITY OF VERO BEACH
300.00
308256
2/3/2014
TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES
1,460.00
308257
2/3/2014
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
87.00
308258
2/3/2014
IRC HOUSING AUTHORITY
525.00
308259
2/3/2014
FULCHINI ENTERPRISES INC
284.00
308260
2/3/2014
VENETIAN APARTMENTS OF VERO BEACH
874.00
308261
2/3/2014
HERMOSA PROPERTIES LLC
301.00
308262
2/3/2014
PINNACLE GROVE LTD
7,361.00
308263
2/3/2014
VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD
16,621.00
308264
2/3/2014
CRAIG MERRILL
1,369.00
308265
2/3/2014
CHRISTINE SALTER
511.00
308266
2/3/2014
HAGGERTY FAMILY LTD
307.00
308267
2/3/2014
THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH
12,103.00
308268
2/3/2014
THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH
3,512.00
308269
2/3/2014
FELLSMERE COMM ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC
91.00
308270
2/3/2014
HENRY O SPEIGHT
645.00
308271
2/3/2014
DAVID CONDON
590.00
308272
2/3/2014
HILARY MCIVOR
550.00
308273
2/3/2014
PAULA LANE
409.00
308274
2/3/2014
JOHN A CAPPELLO
418.00
308275
2/3/2014
TCG SONRISE 11 LLC
625.00
308276
2/3/2014
PELICAN ISLES LP
4,414.00
308277
2/3/2014
PELICAN ISLES LP
1,072.00
308278
2/3/2014
SUNCOAST REALTY & RENTAL MGMT LLC
7,031.00
308279
2/3/2014
OAK RIVER PROPERTIES INC
783.00
308280
2/3/2014
LAKELAND HOUSING AUTHORITY
280.76
0
CHECK NBR
CK DATE
VENDOR
AMOUNT
308281
2/3/2014
1 ARIL LEWIS
416.00
308282
2/3/2014
MICHAEL KANNER
619.00
308283
2/3/2014
AD & IN SERVICES INC
485.00
308284
2/3/2014
RICHARD JOHN KELLER
621.00
308285
2/3/2014
ADINA GOLDMAN
464.00
308286
2/3/2014
INDIAN RIVER RDA LP
315.00
308287
2/3/2014
GEORGE THUYNS
607.00
308288
2/3/2014
LAZY J LLC
399.00
308289
2/3/2014
SYLVIA MCNEILL
243.00
308290
2/3/2014
SKOKIE HOLDINGS INC
750.00
308291
2/3/2014
LILIAN N BEUTTELL
441.00
308292
2/3/2014
ROGER WINSLOW
500.00
308293
2/3/2014
TAMMY MEEKS
690.00
308294
2/3/2014
VINCENT PILEGGI
449.00
308295
2/3/2014
OSLO VALLEY PROPERTIES INC
737.00
308296
2/3/2014
VICKY L STANLEY
797.00
308297
2/3/2014
CORY J HOWELL
321.00
308298
2/3/2014
CHOICE RENTALS INC
485.00
308299
2/3/2014
WILLIAM JAMES STANGANELLI
394.00
308300
2/3/2014
THE CHARLES F FOWLER 1996 CHARITABLE UNITRUS
793.00
308301
2/3/2014
OSCEOLA COUNTY SECTION 8
509.76
308302
2/3/2014
WYNN OWLE
572.00
308303
2/3/2014
WILLIAM NEUWIRTH
633.00
308304
2/3/2014
ANTHONYARROYO
301.00
308305
2/3/2014
BRIGITTE BALL
532.00
308306
2/3/2014
AHS HOLDINGS GROUP LLC
4,768.00
308307
2/3/2014
COUNTY OF VOLUSIA HVC PROGRAM
638.76
308308
2/3/2014
YVONNE KOUTSOFIOS
280.00
308309
2/3/2014
ALAN R TOKAR
739.00
308310
2/3/2014
VILLAS OF VERO BEACH
486.00
308311
2/3/2014
BRIAN E GALLAGHER
500.00
308312
2/3/2014
MANUEL V CAMACHO SR LLC
728.00
308313
2/3/2014
HOUSING AUTHORITY
657.76
308314
2/3/2014
ALCURT VERO BEACH LLC
5,483.00
308315
2/3/2014
STEPHANIE WATCHEK FOUNTAIN ESTATE
273.00
308316
2/3/2014
FRANKLIN TODD & DEANA MARCHANT
539.00
308317
2/3/2014
MICHAEL STILES
485.00
308318
2/3/2014
BLTREJV3 PALM BEACH LLC
1,175.00
308319
2/3/2014
CARROLL CAUDILL JR
483.00
308320
2/3/2014
LINDA KAY SHORT
442.00
308321
2/3/2014
VIOLET A LINDO
750.00
308322
2/3/2014
RACHEL G SIDMAN
465.00
308323
2/3/2014
SCOT WILKE
718.00
308324
2/3/2014
MARK BAER
1,058.00
308325
2/7/2014
PORT CONSOLIDATED INC
814.06
308326
2/7/2014
GUARDIAN EQUIPMENT INC
5,328.00
308327
2/7/2014
JORDAN MOWER INC
599.04
308328
2/7/2014
ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC
141.53
308329
2/7/2014
RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC
642.65
308330
2/7/2014
VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC
479.65
308331
2/7/2014
COPYCOINC
111.19
308332
2/7/2014
CHISHOLM CORP OF VERO
1,012.40
308333
2/7/2014
VELDE FORD INC
525.78
308334
2/7/2014
AT&T WIRELESS
4,005.22
308335
2/7/2014
DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC
2,429.00
308336
2/7/2014
SEWELL HARDWARE CO INC
232.52
308337
2/7/2014
DELTA SUPPLY CO
189.16
308338
2/7/2014
KELLY TRACTOR CO
4,764.46
308339
2/7/2014
GENES AUTO GLASS INC
75.00
308340
2/7/2014
COCA COLA REFRESHMENTS USA INC
167.52
2
9
CHECK NBR
CK DATE
VENDOR
AMOUNT
308341
2/7/2014
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
331.09
308342
2/7/2014
MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY CO
307.42
308343
2/7/2014
AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP
3,278.19
308344
2/7/2014
KSM ENGINEERING & TESTING INC
452.50
308345
2/7/2014
HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD
3,127.15
308346
2/7/2014
PETES CONCRETE
2,650.00
308347
2/7/2014
EGP INC
499.70
308348
2/7/2014
JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC
310.44
308349
2/7/2014
PROFORMA IMAGING
60.12
308350
2/7/2014
SPORTSMANS SPECIALTY GROUP
367.72
308351
2/7/2014
EXPRESS REEL GRINDING INC
950.00
308352
2/7/2014
NEWMANS POWER SYSTEMS
4,224.39
308353
2/7/2014
GENERAL PART INC
1,192.27
308354
2/7/2014
GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER
870.80
308355
2/7/2014
SIGNS IN A DAY
432.00
308356
2/7/2014
BLAKESLEE SERVICES INC
760.00
308357
2/7/2014
BAKER & TAYLOR INC
239.68
308358
2/7/2014
MIDWEST TAPE LLC
739.70
308359
2/7/2014
NEPTUNE -BENSON INC
812.71
308360
2/7/2014
NEWSBANK INC
1,441.25
308361
2/7/2014
1 KRUGER INC
12,413.77
308362
2/7/2014
RELIABLE POLY JOHN
230.35
308363
2/7/2014
GREENE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP LTD
441.38
308364
2/7/2014
CITY OF VERO BEACH
12,771.82
308365
2/7/2014
COMPBENEFITS COMPANY
194.28
308366
2/7/2014
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INS CO
127.08
308367
2/7/2014
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE CO
23,003.49
308368
2/7/2014
NAN MCKAY AND ASSOCIATES INC
224.00
308369
2/7/2014
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC
3,402.00
308370
2/7/2014
LIVINGSTON PAGE
90.00
308371
2/7/2014
JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC
1,986.68
308372
2/7/2014
PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS
62.90
308373
2/7/2014
PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS
41.90
308374
2/7/2014
WAL MART STORES EAST LP
301.82
308375
2/7/2014
MARRIOTT FT LAUDERDALE NORTH
129.00
308376
2/7/2014
WILLIAM KEITH MCCULLY
25.00
308377
2/7/2014
ACUSHNET COMPANY
100.06
308378
2/7/2014
NYE LTD
2,176.00
308379
2/7/2014
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC
20,434.91
308380
2/7/2014
FEDERAL EXPRESS
30.67
308381
2/7/2014
MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION
1,404.48
308382
2/7/2014
DON LAWLESS
60.00
308383
2/7/2014
TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC
107,715.70
308384
2/7/2014
TRAFFIC PARTS INC
3,607.00
308385
2/7/2014
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
4,327.07
308386
2/7/2014
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
1,403.70
308387
2/7/2014
ACUSHNET COMPANY
79.77
308388
2/7/2014
JAMES GRAY JR
150.41
308389
2/7/2014
TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC
665.77
308390
2/7/2014
GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER INC
7,025.62
308391
2/7/2014
GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC
1,656.05
308392
2/7/2014
STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES & CREMATORY
425.00
308393
2/7/2014
CHRISTOPHER R MORA
201.99
308394
2/7/2014
INDIAN RIVER CARPENTRY INC
9,960.00
308395
2/7/2014
BE SAFE SECURITY ALARMS INC
239.70
308396
2/7/2014
BELA NAGY
458.53
308397
2/7/2014
GERALD A YOUNG SR
60.00
308398
2/7/2014
HENRY SMITH
108.00
308399
2/7/2014
WRITERS INSTITUTE INC
23.90
308400
2/7/2014
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES
2,505.00
10
CHECK NBR
CK DATE
VENDOR
AMOUNT
308401
2/7/2014
RANGE ROAD MINE LLC
1,804.83
308402
2/7/2014
ALAN C KAUFFMANN
100.00
308403
2/7/2014
NEXTRAN CORPORATION
2,697.20
308404
2/7/2014
WESTSIDE REPROGRAPHICS OF VERO BEACH INC
51.16
308405
2/7/2014
COMCAST
113.14
308406
2/7/2014
ADVANCED XEROGRAPHICS IMAGING
2,606.61
308407
2/7/2014
IDEA GARDEN ADVERTISING
150.00
308408
2/7/2014
JONATHAN CLARK
113.77
308409
2/7/2014
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
18,000.00
308410
2/7/2014
DONADIO AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS
15,060.71
308411
2/7/2014
C & C ELECTRIC WORKS INC
2,054.00
308412
2/7/2014
JAMES WILLIAM COLEY
60.00
308413
2/7/2014
HOMETOWN NEWS
150.00
308414
2/7/2014
BROWN CONTRACTORS INC
300.00
308415
2/7/2014
LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC
1,240.60
308416
2/7/2014
RUSSELL PAYNE INC
566.24
308417
2/7/2014
CELICO PARTNERSHIP
120.15
308418
2/7/2014
ALLSTATE
603.38
308419
2/7/2014
CINDY CORRENTE
31.15
308420
2/7/2014
VAN WAL INC
9.00
308421
2/7/2014
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
6,311.88
308422
2/7/2014
JOSEPH W VASQUEZ
90.00
308423
2/7/2014
DASIE BRIDGEWATER HOPE CENTER INC
6,521.60
308424
2/7/2014
SHELLEY NOWLIN
4.64
308425
2/7/2014
POLISH AMERICAN SOCIAL CLUB
1,150.00
308426
2/7/2014
MCMAHON ASSOCIATES INC
1,500.00
308427
2/7/2014
JOHN SCOTT DAILEY
150.00
308428
2/7/2014
GARY L EMBREY
40.00
308429
2/7/2014
LARRY STEPHENS
90.00
308430
2/7/2014
JOSE RIVERA
40.00
308431
2/7/2014
DANE PFARR
60.00
308432
2/7/2014
ORCHID ISLAND PROPERTY MGMT I1 INC
3,200.00
308433
2/7/2014
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC
352.07
308434
2/7/2014
KENNY CAMPBELL JR
60.00
308435
2/7/2014
NORMAN GOODMAN
120.00
308436
2/7/2014
MIKE'S LAND CLEARING & EXCVTN INC
1,000.00
308437
2/7/2014
ALL PRO PAINT & BODY INC
5,334.20
308438
2/7/2014
AIRVAC INC
1,092.92
308439
2/7/2014
JOHNNY B SMITH
114.00
308440
2/7/2014
MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS INC
7,661.05
308441
2/7/2014
DANE MACDONALD
54.00
308442
2/7/2014
ARTISTIC FIRST FLORIST
87.45
308443
2/7/2014
TRINITY HIGHWAY PRODUCTS LLC
263.00
308444
2/7/2014
GLOBALSTAR USA
119.40
308445
2/7/2014
COOLIDGE, ROBERT
100.00
308446
2/7/2014
CHARLES A WALKER
40.00
308447
2/7/2014
GERRY SMITH
108.00
308448
2/7/2014
CEMEX
1,492.13
308449
2/7/2014
BATES, NIKKI
80.00
308450
2/7/2014
JEAN PINELLO
28.90
308451
2/7/2014
DANIEL IOFFREDO
20.00
308452
2/7/2014
BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC
271.56
308453
2/7/2014
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO
885.00
308454
2/7/2014
K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING
1,535.00
308455
2/7/2014
DAVID L HANCOCK
3,718.50
308456
2/7/2014
NICOLACE MARKETING INC
1,332.00
308457
2/7/2014
EQ THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMPANY
13,897.63
308458
2/7/2014
TERESA PULIDO
150.00
308459
2/7/2014
SANDY ARACENA
40.00
308460
2/7/2014
EVERY FLORIDA HOME
289.63
11
CHECK NBR
CK DATE
VENDOR
AMOUNT
308461
2/7/2014
KNAPHEIDE TRUCK EQUIPMENT SOUTHEAST
157.85
308462
2/7/2014
BENEFITS WORKSHOP
1,328.70
308463
2/7/2014
ALWAYS ON TIME ENTERPRISES INC
1,235.00
308464
2/7/2014
WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC
3,133.00
308465
2/7/2014
KEMPER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
7.56
308466
2/7/2014
GUETTLER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC
253,087.29
308467
2/7/2014
SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES
91.31
308468
2/7/2014
JULIE NORMAN
90.00
308469
2/7/2014
DALE SORENSEN REAL ESTATE
130.00
308470
2/7/2014
STEVEN A ABBOND
60.00
308471
2/7/2014
D R HORTON INC
9,620.00
308472
2/7/2014
TC XPERIENCE GUIDE
79.00
308473
2/7/2014
JANCY PET BURIAL SERVICE
114.75
308474
2/7/2014
FLORIDA COMBINED
8,494.84
308475
2/7/2014
FLORIDA COMBINED
14,035.20
308476
2/7/2014
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC
3,120.00
308477
2/7/2014
PHYLLISTINE MOORE
500.00
308478
2/7/2014
DELRAY MOTORS
116.39
308479
2/7/2014
JOSEPH CATALANO
40.00
308480
2/7/2014
DEPT OF HWY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES
10.00
308481
2/7/2014
RAYMOND J DUCHEMIN
60.00
308482
2/7/2014
KEITH GROCHOLL
40.00
308483
2/7/2014
WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC
19,834.54
308484
2/7/2014
YP LLC
167.00
308485
2/7/2014
JENKINS TRUCKING INC
5,440.00
308486
2/7/2014
NEWSOM OIL COMPANY
385.00
308487
2/7/2014
B & E PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
775.00
308488
2/7/2014
JDA SYSTEMS
4,776.00
308489
2/7/2014
LINDA GRAHAM
240.00
308490
2/7/2014
CENTRAL FLORIDA GOLF CARS INC
279.06
308491
2/7/2014
TIM ZORC
159.21
308492
2/7/2014
PARWANI LAW PA
31.25
308493
2/7/2014
TAMATHA R TORRES
120.00
308494
2/7/2014
REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC
8.64
308495
2/7/2014
AMERICAN MESSAGING SERVICES LLC
11.79
308496
2/7/2014
LOWES HOME CENTERS INC
882.41
308497
2/7/2014
LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC
5,594.88
308498
2/7/2014
AMG SF LLC
103.77
308499
2/7/2014
MITCHELL GODWIN
54.00
308500
2/7/2014
STEVEN G HANSEN
150.00
308501
2/7/2014
WILLIAM C CARROLL
35.71
308502
2/7/2014
FELIX ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA
813.13
308503
2/7/2014
WILLIAM SHOAF JR
60.00
308504
2/7/2014
CARMEN LEWIS
120.00
308505
2/7/2014
NICOLE GRAPPO
150.00
308506
2/7/2014
MICHAEL M SWAIN
2,100.00
308507
2/7/2014
MICHAEL YOUNG
60.00
308508
2/7/2014
VERA GALLIMORE
7.34
308509
2/7/2014
C E R. SIGNATURE CLEANING
5,000.00
308510
2/7/2014
VINCENT OUTLER
54.00
308511
2/7/2014
MANNY CABO
17.75
308512
2/7/2014
DEBORAH A MARTELLA
681.17
308513
2/7/2014
YVONNE KEENEY
75.00
308514
2/7/2014
GHO FIELDSTONE RANCH CORP
70.75
308515
2/7/2014
UT REFUNDS
41.78
308516
2/7/2014
CHANDA MUNDY
32.31
308517
2/7/2014
UT REFUNDS
49.45
308518
2/7/2014
ELISA MORRIS
26.42
308519
2/7/2014
JEFF & KAREN WLLIARD
39.42
308520
2/7/2014
GEORGE SOFFI
32.17
12
CHECK NBR
CK DATE
VENDOR
AMOUNT
308521
2/7/2014
KEENA PRICE-MASTERS
25.36
308522
2/7/2014
CLIFFORD SCHROEDER
27.81
308523
2/7/2014
EDWARD W & CATHLEEN HILL
38.01
308524
2/7/2014
BRENDA K WILLIAMS
18.27
308525
2/7/2014
VIRGINIA BLOSSOM
308.88
308526
2/7/2014
SHAWN D MURPHY
27.84
308527
2/7/2014
LAWRENCE G LYNN
29.21
308528
2/7/2014
CYNTHIA BRISKE
13.28
308529
2/7/2014
LUCIANA MELO
33.61
308530
2/7/2014
ROBERT BLANCHARD
37.37
308531
2/7/2014
M KATE BRESNICK
61.04
308532
2/7/2014
MELANIE PACOT
10.58
308533
2/7/2014
KATHERINE NICKELSON
39.58
308534
2/7/2014
CATHERINE BIERMAN
14.44
308535
2/7/2014
LEAH FREEMAN
95.47
308536
2/7/2014
FATIMA C JOHNSON
72.96
308537
2/7/2014
ALEX ALDERMAN
78.32
308538
2/7/2014
LISA WHITEMAN
2.13
308539
2/7/2014
SHONNICA SMITH
29.11
308540
2/7/2014
JOHN G MITCHELL
168.32
308541
2/7/2014
DANIEL DONAGHUE
55.05
308542
2/7/2014
ARTURO LOZOYA
33.42
308543
2/7/2014
AMY SCHMALREID
37.03
308544
2/7/2014
YOSIKAZU DEROOS
81.08
308545
2/7/2014
TIM STARK
69.33
308546
2/7/2014
WILLENE TOSCANO
90.16
308547
2/7/2014
ROGER LEACH
66.39
308548
2/7/2014
MELISSA RINGLER
15.00
308549
2/7/2014
EVA MCMILLAN
76.73
308550
2/7/2014
MICHAELARLOTTA
36.50
308551
2/7/2014
KEITH GONZALEZ
41.86
308552
2/7/2014
SEAN PRESCOTT
72.90
308553
2/7/2014
KAZEEM YUSUF
32.01
308554
2/7/2014
APEX COMPANIES LLC
328.24
Grand Total:
883,844.06
13
ELECTRONIC; PAYMENT- VISA CARD
14
TRANS. NBR
DATE
VENDOR
AMOUNT
1003371
1/30/2014
EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC
77.08
1003372
1/30/2014
COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL
51,225.12
1003373
1/30/2014
NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC
10.72
1003374
1/30/2014
LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC
85.75
1003375
1/30/2014
ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC
479.25
1003376
1/30/2014
SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC
28.81
1003377
1/30/2014
SPINNAKER VERO INC
733.15
1003378
1/31/2014
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC
607.10
1003379
1/31/2014
AT&T
10,281.15
1003380
1/31/2014
WASTE MANAGEMENT INC
2,700.34
1003381
1/31/2014
AT&T
315.70
1003382
2/3/2014
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY
71.45
1003383
2/3/2014
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA
424.00
1003384
2/3/2014
MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC
250.00
1003385
2/3/2014
GALLS LLC
7.96
1003386
2/3/2014
S & S AUTO PARTS
515.67
1003387
2/4/2014
EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC
213.89
1003388
2/4/2014
SERVICE REFRIGERATION INC
1,100.00
1003389
2/4/2014
APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO
109.84
1003390
2/4/2014
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL LLC
455.83
1003391
2/4/2014
APPLE MACHINE & SUPPLY CO
132.44
1003392
2/4/2014
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
12,736.79
1003393
2/4/2014
FLAGLER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LLC
585.56
1003394
2/4/2014
FLINT TRADING INC
563.95
1003395
2/4/2014
CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS
18.16
1003396
2/4/2014
EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER
214.00
1003397
2/5/2014
EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC
472.17
1003398
1003399
2/5/2014
2/5/2014
PARKS RENTAL & SALES INC
UNIVERSAL SIGNS & ACCESSORIES
228.00
4,247.00
1003400
2/5/2014
VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER INC
31.20
1003401
2/5/2014
GALLS LLC
108.00
1003402
2/5/2014
SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE
654.73
1003403
2/5/2014
COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP
307.36
1003404
2/5/2014
COMMERCIAL ENERGY SPECIALISTS
18.60
1003405
2/5/2014
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
8,563.55
1003406
2/5/2014
MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO
378.00
1003407
2/5/2014
RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS
491.40
1003408
2/5/2014
FLAGLER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LLC
339.89
1003409
2/5/2014
WACO FILTERS CORPORATION
4,439.85
1003410
2/5/2014
S & S AUTO PARTS
127.20
1003418
2/6/2014
SAFETY PRODUCTS INC
160.95
1003419
2/6/2014
LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC
65.00
1003420
2/6/2014
INDIAN RIVER BATTERY
909.90
1003421
2/6/2014
INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC
91.00
1003422
2/6/2014
HILL MANUFACTURING CO INC
601.00
1003423
2/6/2014
RECORDED BOOKS LLC
379.20
1003424
2/6/2014
S & S AUTO PARTS
764.66
1003425
2/6/2014
AT&T
1,220.89
1003426
2/6/2014
OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC
2,293.70
1003427
2/6/2014
WASTE MANAGEMENT INC
2,502.82
Grand Total:
113,339.78
14
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & AC;H
TRANS NBR
DATE
VENDOR
AMOUNT
2817
1/31/2014
SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION
249,412.94
2818
1/31/2014
KIMLEY HORN & ASSOC INC
10,960.00
2819
1/31/2014
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT
75,190.08
2820
1/31/2014
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS 73,604.73
2821
1/31/2014
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF
3,119,831.73
2822
1/31/2014
ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION
9,978.23
2823
1/31/2014
ICMA RET CORP
1,900.00
2824
1/31/2014
FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC
4,609.83
2825
1/31/2014
NACO/SOUTHEAST
25,510.48
2826
1/31/2014
NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT
302.97
2827
1/31/2014
IRC FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC
6,060.00
2828
1/31/2014
FL SDU
6,247.27
2829
2/3/2014
IRS -PAYROLL TAXES
380,660.37
2830
2/3/2014
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMIN
13,173.89
2831
2/4/2014
PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
12,849.47
2832
2/5/2014
FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM
616,966.24
2833
2/6/2014
GRACE TITLE INC
10,000.00
Grand Total:
4,617,258.23
15
Consent Agenda Item
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
Date: February 7, 2014
To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services 4%
Prepared By: Terry Southard, Operations Manage%V
Subject: Final pay to Flanders --Bid #:2013046JNCRO Plant VFD's replacement
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS:
On July 25, 2013 Indian River County Purchasing Department opened bids for Bid #2013046
North County RO Plant VFD's Replacement. Two Companies placed bids on the project, and
Flanders of Lakeland Florida, the low bidder was awarded the project at $55,000.
ANALYSIS:
Flanders has completed the replacement of all three (3) VFD's as required by the Contract
Agreement. All testing has taken place and the equipment is on-line and operating per the
Agreement. At this time Flanders is requesting Final pay of $55,000.00.
FUNDING:
Funds for this project are derived from the Renewal and Replacement (R&R) budget in the
operating fund. Operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales.
ACCOUNT NO.:
Description
North County RO Plant VFD Replacement
Account Number I Amount
47123536-044699-13516 1 $55,000.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Final Pay Request to
Flanders of Lakeland FL., in the amount of $55,000.00 as presented.
ATTACHMENT(s):
Invoice #IN142777 from Flanders
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
Indian River Co. Approved Date
Administration
Legal i 1►w
Budget
By: 0 Utilities
Josep A. Baird, County Administrator Utilities -Finance
Fo r, p
i1bate
CADocuments And Settings\Aobertautsch\Desktop\Agenda-Final Pay To Flanders - AH -Final 2-7-14 (2).Doc
ms
Page 1 of 1
16
r L_/-lwvcil�7 ii lural la
PO BOX 993 (ISO9001:2000)
EVANSVILL.E, IN 47706-0993
FLAN "" I` PHONE NO. (812) 867-7421
FAX NO. (812) 867-2687
WEB SITE www.flanderselectric.com
INVOICE
IIVVVRr-NV.
IIY 11tt I I I
CUSTOMER PO NO,
2013046
REQ./REL./JOB NO.
JOB:
136660
CUSTOMER ID#
HP
RPM
FRAMEAMPS
DATE RECD
09/27/13
DATE SHIPPED
12/11/13
DATE INVOICED
01/08/14
DESCRIPTION
STYLE/TYPE
MODEL
SERIAL NO.
(3) 300 HP DRIVE PROJECT
1 1
136660
MAKE
HP
RPM
FRAMEAMPS
VOLTS
PHASE
HZ
SERVICES
BILL TO: 3844
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
1801 27TH ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32960
WORK COMPLETED
GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORK
FIELD SERVICE PREP
PAINT
CUSTOM MACHINE WORK
ON-SITE REPAIR
MATERIALS:
QUANTITY UOM
1,200.00 INCH
16.00 PACK
100.00 EACH
1.00 EACH
8.00 EACH
3.00 EACH
8.00 EACH
9.00 EACH
8.00 EACH
3.00 EACH
4.00
3.00 EACH
2.00 EACH
30.00 FEET
404.00 EACH
120.00 EACH
110.00 EACH
110.00 EACH
100.00 EACH
100.00 EACH
6.00 EACH
DESCRIPTION
SHIP TO:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
1801 27TH ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32960
ql -wqt�eq - 1 -�3 ��f co
ANGLE IR,2"X2"X1/4"(.266#/IN)
045242160341 EMT.BLADE
70169573 PHOENIX CONTACT TERM BL
44104 IDEAL 46-90 WIRE MARKER BOX
70169570 PHOENIX CONTACT END BRA
CABLE (MISC)
70169101 PHOENIX CONTACT END CLA
70169250 PHOENIX CONTACT BRIDGE 3
70169602 PHOENIX CONTACT COVER 30
CFW110370T4SZ VARIBABLE FREQUEN
FS-PERDIEM 11/14/13-ALW
RHMIF-01 CRW11 FRAME FOR REMOTE
44102 IDEAL WIRE LABELS A -Z,0-15
LW,MOTOR, EPDM, 60OV,4/0,BLACK
IOA-01 CFW11 IOA MODULE
70169062 ZB MARKING STRIP
70169063 ZB MARKING STRIP
70169064 ZB MARKING STRIP
CTSB-1112 11" 120# CABLE TIE
CTMT-0010 1" SQ CABLE TIE MOUNTING
70169605 PHOENIC PARTITION PLATE 3
k�vi1X�
JAN 2 12014
�'F/NAc���
�OE1V Et?
CPN � � 1p14
�y'lNA
�v It
MATERIAL 46,000.00 1LABOR 9,000.00 FRTIOTHER 0.00 Ax FL7 0.00 f TOTAL 55,000,00
INVOICE NO. IN142777 Page 1
Terms NET 30 DAYS CUSTOMER PO NO. 12013046
17
�w A6,
FLANDERS
FLANDERS Indiana Date
PO BOX 993 (IS09001:2000) ` 12/11/13
EVANSVILLE, IN 47706-0993
PHONE NO. (812) 867-7421-'
FAX NO. (812) 867-2687
Web Site www.flanderselectric.com
—7
PICK UP FROM: RETURN TO:
Flanders Electric Florida
2701 S. Combee Rd
Lakeland, FL 33803
863-510-0555
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
1801 27TH ST
VERO BEACH, FL 32960
JOB NO.: 136660
P.O. NO.:
RELEASE NO.:
DESCRIPTION: (3) 300 HP DRIVE PROJECT
CUSTOMER ID
MODEL:
JIAKE:
SERIAL #: 136660
HP:
RPM: TVOLTS:
PHASE:
CYCLE:
AMPS:
STYLE:
FRAME: SERVICES
CONTACT:
REMARKS:
Delivery
QF -ADM -0500 REV. 05/13/2005
Z '�)
IbD -
RECEIVED BY:
PRINTED NAME: c" rd Lck
DATE & TIME OF DELIVERY: ("L-/[ am m
CUSTOMER COPY
18
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
Date: January 30, 2014
To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services
Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Aw
Gordon Sparks, P.E., Environmental Engineer
Subject: 66th Avenue Phase 2 Utility Conflict Resolutions,
Final Pay to Carter Assoc., Inc., for Work Order No. 2 — UCP 4040
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS:
On February 9, 2010 the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Continuing Consulting
Services Work Order No. 2 with Carter Assoc., Inc. for $24,700.00 survey, design and construction
services for 66th Avenue Phase 2. The purpose of Work Order No. 2 was to resolve conflicts
between existing utilities and proposed roadway drainage and paving improvements.
ANALYSIS:
The roadway improvements have now been completed and the conflicts were successfully resolved
during construction. Carter Assoc., Inc. submitted Application for Payment No. 14 Final on January
30, 2014 for $3,304.46. Previous payments to date total $21,155.11 resulting in a final total cost for
the consulting services of $24,459.57, or $240.43 less than budgeted.
FUNDING:
Funds for this project are derived from the other professional services account in the operating
fund. Operating funds are generated from water and sewer sales.
ACCOUNT NO.:
Description
Account Number
Amount
471-206000-10506
$1,113.42
66th Avenue Phase 2
47123536-044699-10506
$2,191.04
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached Application for Payment No. 14 Final from Carter
Assoc., Inc. in an amount of $3,304.46.
Page 1 of 2
19
ATTACHMENT(s):
1. Application for Payment No. 14 Final from Carter Assoc., Inc.
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
By:
loLhkaird, County Administrator
For./F awl
to
Indian River Co. Apm4ckved
Date
Administrationkk
413I
Legal
Budget
�Q
Utilities
't
Utilities -Finance
F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\IRC - 66th Avenue Phase 2 Roadway4th St to 16th St - Utility Conflicts
UCP#4040 Carter Assoc\A1- Agenda - W.O. #2 Final Pay to Carter.doc Page 2 of 2
20
CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
1708 21st STREET • VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-3472 • 772-5624191 • 772-562-7180 (FAX)
JOHN H. BLUM, P.E.; PRINCIPAL
DAVID E. LUETHJE, P.S.M., PRINCIPAL
GEORGE A. SIMONS, P.E., PRINCIPAL
PATRICK S. WALTHER, P.E., PRINCIPAL
MARVIN E. CARTER, P.S.M., Consultant to the Firm
DEAN F. LUETHJE, P.E., iFLQ aci Consultant to the Firm
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. Final
WORK ORDER NO.2
66TH AVENUE PHASE 2 WATER MAIN CONFLICT
IRC PROJECT NO. UPS 4040
To: INDIAN RIVER DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
FRANK S. CUCCURESE, P.S.M.
CLINTON J. RAHJES, P.E.
STEVE D. SNOBERGER, P.E.
BENJAMIN D. SPEED, P.E.
For work accomplished through the date "of January 27, 2014
°✓u Complete Prom
Previous Pay '
Task Contract Amount; Requests
% Complete This
Pay Request
Gross Contract
Amount Due
Task
• Design Survey $ 770.00 '100.00%
770.00
Task II
• Coordination with Public Works Department 1,?.00.00 100:00"/0
1,200.00
Task III
• Construction Plans and Specifications 10,200.00 100.00%
,
10,200.00
Task IV
• Permitting Exemption 600.00 `160.00
600.00
Task V
• Construction Administration 3,780.00 100.00°/n
3,780.00
Task VI
• Construction Inspection 5,220.00 58.50%
41.50%
5,220.00
Task VII
• As -Built Drawings 2,480.00 160.040/0
2,480.00
Reimbursable Expenses
• Not to Exceed 450.00 41.12%
5.45%
209.57
Total Amount of Contract 24,700.00
TOTAL GROSS CONTRACT AMOUNT DUE
$
24,459.57
HINUS AMOUNT OF RETAINAGE
(0% of Total Gross Contract Amount Due)
0.00
CONTRACT AMOUNT EARNED TO DATE
(Total Gross Contract Amount Due irinus,plus Amount of Retainage)
$
24,459.57
TOTAL INVOICED BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO TMS PAY REQUEST
(21,155.11)
AMOUNT DUE THIS PAY REQUEST
(Contract Amount Earned To -Date minus 'Total Amount Paid to Engineer Prior To This Pay
Request)
$
3,304.46
J:\AR'Manual Invoices\09-63 E IRC Utility Services 66th Ave\09-63 E Invoices 2013
VAI VA
SCMV Florida
Since 1911
Page 1 Of 3
21
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 14,
THROUGH WORK ORDER NO.2
66TH AVENUE PHASE 2 WATER MAIN CONFLICTS
IRC PROJECT NO. UCP 4040
REIMBURSABLE BREAKDOWN
January 27, 2014
DESCRIPTION
CURRENT
PREVIOUS
TOTAL
Copies (1 I" x 17") B&W 90 @ 35C/Ea.
$ 0.00
58.10 $
58.10
Express Mail
0.00
16.87
16.87
Mileage
$ 24.52
110.07
134.59
TOTALS:
$ 24.52
$ 185.04 $
209.56
J:\AR\Manual Invoices\09-63 E SRC Utility Services 66th Ave\09-63 E Invoices 2013 Page 3 of 3
22
Attachment I
CONSULTANT'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. Final THROUGH
WORK ORDER NO.2
66th AVENUE PHASE 2 WATER MAIN CONFLICTS
IRC PROJECT NO. UPC 4040
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION:
THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFIES that I have checked
and verified the above Application for Payment No. Final and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief, it is a true and correct statement of work performed and/or material
supplied by the ENGINEER; that all work and/or materials included in the Application for
Payment have been inspected by me and/or by my duly authorized representative or assistants;
that is has been performed and/or supplied in full accordance with the requirements of the
referenced Contract and with sound engineering practice and judgment; and that the payment
amount claimed and requested by the ENGINEER is correctly computed on the basis of work
performed and/or materials supplied to date.
THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE ALSO CERTIFIES that all
previous progress payments received from the COUNTY on account of Work done under the
Contract referred to above have been applied on account to discharge ENGINEER'S legitimate
obligations incurred in connection with Work covered by prior Applications for Payment
numbered I through 13 inclusive; and if this is a Final Pay Request, I further certify that
all persons doing work upon or furnishing materials or supplies for this project under this
foregoing Contract have been paid in full.
ENGINEER: CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC
1708 21 st Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(772) 562-4191
Dated 1/28/2014
ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE:
Name & Title: Seven �Sno erger
State of Florida
County of Indian River
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28th day of _January, 2014.
tary Public
My Commission expires: 09/23/2016
,> Notary Punic State of Florida ,
Joan M Ross `
My Commission EE 837 73.,
'# w Expires 0912312016 , 7:
JAAR\Manual Invoices\09-63 E IRC Utility Services 66th Ave\09-63 E Invoices 2013
Project Manager
Page 2 of 3
23
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM 9 b''
TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director
FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine r `
SUBJECT: South County Regional Park Multi -Purpose Fields
Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities
IRC Project No. 1126 Bid No. 2013009
DATE: February 10, 2014
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
With regard to the completion of the South County Regional Park Multi -Purpose Fields, the
Public Works Department funded the construction of the Sewer Main and Sanitary Lift Station
to support the activities of the site. The Sewer Main and Sanitary Lift Station will also provide
service for the future Intergenerational Recreational Facility which will also be located within
South County Regional Park.
The attached Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities has been prepared to transfer the equipment to
Indian River County Utility Services Department, an Enterprise Fund entity.
FUNDING
Cost of recording fees for recordation of the Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities is $27.00. Funding is
budgeted and available from Optional Sales Tax South County Park Multi -Purpose Fields
Account No. 31521072-066510-11006 in the amount of $27.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve of the attached Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities and authorize the Chairman of the Board
of County Commissioners to execute the Bill of Sale for recordation in the Public Records of
Indian River County, Florida.
F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1126 - South Co Park Multi Purpose Fields\Adcnun\agenda items\BCC Agenda Bill of Sale of Uti&ty Facilities 02-18-2014.doc 24
Page 2
South County Regional Park Multi -Purpose Fields
Christopher J. Kafer Jr., P.E., County Engineer
For February 18, 2014 BCC Meeting
ATTACHMENTS
Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities to Indian River County, Florida
DISTRIBUTION
1. Jesse Roland, Plans Reviewer, Utility Services
2. Raeanne Cone — Fixed Assets, Finance Office, Clerk of Court
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM
Indian River County
ApppMd
Date
Administration
W.
%a J
Budget
40H
Legal
Utility Services
General Services
Public Works
it' is -IY
Engineering
OF
FdPublic Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1126 - South Co Park Multi Purpose Fields\Admbn\agenda itetns\BCC Agenda Bill of Sale of Utility Facilities 02.18.2014.&c 25
BILL OF SALE OF UTILITY FACILITIES
to
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida, having an address of 1801 27`h Street, Vero Beach,
Florida 32960, hereinafter called GRANTOR, in consideration of value received, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has and does hereby grant, bargain, sell, transfer,
and deliver unto INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose
address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, hereinafter called GRANTEE, this
day of February, 2014, the following goods and chattels:
EXHIBIT "A"ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE APART HEREOF
which utility facilities are located on property known as the South County Regional Park, and
further identified as Tax Parcel No. 33-39-23-00001-0100-00001.0,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto GRANTEE forever, and GRANTOR hereby warrants
to the GRANTEE that it has free and unencumbered title to the above-described facilities, that
all persons or entities which have supplied labor.or materials with respect to these facilities have
been paid in full, that none of them has any claim whatsoever with respect thereto, and that the
GRANTOR has full authority to make this conveyance and will warrant and defend the sale of
said chattels and utility facilities hereby made unto GRANTEE against the lawful claims and
demands of all persons whomsoever.
GRANTOR hereby further warrants that should the above described utility facilities fail or
otherwise become defective during a period of one year from the date of acceptance of same by
GRANTEE (2/18/2014 to 2/18/2015), due to defective materials or workmanship, GRANTOR
shall upon each occasion be responsible in all respects for such failure or defect and shall
correct same at GRANTOR's sole cost and without expense to GRANTEE upon reasonable
notice by GRANTEE. GRANTOR shall be solely liable and shall save GRANTEE harmless from
any direct or consequential damage attributable to such failure or defect. GRANTOR hereby
also assigns all its right, title, and interest in and to manufacturer's or supplier's warranties with
respect to the described facilities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTOR has herein set its hand and seal the day and year first
above written.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
am
ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of
Circuit Court and Comptroller
Deputy Clerk
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman
BCC approved:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY
DYLAN REINGOLD
COUNTY ATTORNEY 26
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly authorized in the
above State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared PETER D.
O'BRYAN, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument as the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, and acknowledged to and before me that he executed the same as the
act and deed of such county.
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the above county and state this day
Of February, 2014.
NOTARY PUBLIC
printed name:
Commission No.:
Commission Expiration:
2 27
Description
Sanitary Sewer
EXHIBIT "Ai"
South County Regional Park
UCP # 3185
Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
Furnish and Install 8" PVC Pipe.
LF
1114
$
38.91
$
43,345.74
Sanitary Sewer Man Hole 4' Diameter (4'-8')
EA
1
$
3,684.47
$
3,684.47
Sanitary Sewer Man Hole 4' Diameter (8'-12')
EA
2
$
4,446.59
$
8,893.18
Sanitary Sewer Man Hole 4' Diameter (12'-16')
EA
2
$
5,066.54
$
10,133.08
furnish and Install 6" PVC Pipe.
LF
23
$
11.76
$
270.48
Subtotal
$
66,326.95
Forcemain
4"U" Tapping Sleeve
EA 1 $
2,277.84
$
2,277.84
Furnish & Install 4" PVC & all appurtenances
LF 282 $
17.11
$
4,825.02
Furnish & Install 4" Poly Directional Bore
LF 80 $
51.79
$
4,143.20
Furnish & Install Lift Station W/O Generator
EA 1 $
141,832.55
$
141,832.55
Subtotal
$
153,078.61
Sanitary Sewer
Forcemain
Bond amount equals 25% of
TOTAL
$ 66,326.95
$ 153,078.61
TOTAL $ 219,405.56
$ 219,405.56 or $ 54,851.39
A P RVES
iRcbus� Z -y zolff
Date:
F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1126 - South Co Park Multi Purpose Fields\Admim\inspectors\Utility Bond—Bill of Sale\Utilities Bond
Form
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engi
Director (7f Y_�
ne r
Amendment No. 2 for Time Extension of Agreement for Annual Professional
Geotechnical Services RFQ No. 2010021
January 29, 2014
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On March 2, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Professional Geotechnical
Service Agreement for Annual Geotechnical Services for one year with an option for three (3) one-
year renewals at the county's discretion to provide various geotechnical services for Indian River
County. The final one-year renewal was approved by the Board of County Commissioners for
March 3, 2013 to March 2, 2014.
Amendment No. 2 is to extend the contract time by approximately seven (7) months for the
current renewal until September 30, 2014. A new RFQwill be advertised June 2014 for submittals.
Approval for the new annual contracts will be requested in September, 2014 to run concurrently
with Indian River County's fiscal year (Oct 1— Sept 30).
The following firms have signed and returned Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Geotechnical
Services Agreement:
Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Port St. Lucie, Florida
GFA International, Inc. Port St. Lucie, Florida
Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc. Port St. Lucie, Florida
K.S.M. Engineering & Testing, Inc. Sebastian, Florida
All four (4) firms have agreed to maintain the current approved year's fees and hourly rates.
FUNDING
Funding sources for continuing environmental and biological support services will vary, dependent
upon the type of project and the associated County Division.
F:\Engineering\Capital Projects\Annual Geotechnical Services Contract\2014 Extension of Agreement 02-11-2014\BCC Extension of Agreement
02-11-2014.doc
29
Page Two
BCC Agenda Item for February 18, 2014
Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engineer
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 2 for a time extension to the Professional
Geotechnical Services Agreement and requests that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute
Amendment No. 2 for the four (4) firms.
ATTACHMENTS
Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Geotechnical Services Agreement for the four (4) firms
DISTRIBUTION
1. Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
2. Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc.
3. GFA International, Inc.
4. K.S.M. Engineering & Testing, Inc.
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM
FOR February1
Indian River County Approed
tate
Administration
Budget
(}
Legal
Public Works tJ�^
Z j 7/ r r
Engineering
�—
F:\Engineering\Capital Projects\Annual Geotechnical Services Contract\2014 Extension of Agreement 02-11-2014\BCC Extension of Agreement
02-11-2014.doc
30
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
This is Amendment No. 2 to the existing Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Geotechnical Services
(AGREEMENT) dated March 10, 2010 between Ardaman & Associates, Inc. (CONSULTANT) and Indian
River County (COUNTY) and renewed for the third and final year for the period March 3, 2013 through
March 2, 2014:
WHEREAS, the existing AGREEMENT between CONSULTANT and COUNTY provides the final
third -year executed renewal to expire on March 2, 2014, this Amendment No. 2 extends the expiration
date until September 30, 2014. Current approved fees and hourly rates will remain unchanged.
This AMENDMENT NO. 2, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed
according to the laws of the State of Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents this
day of
OWNER
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
(Signature)
PETER D. O'BRYAN, CHAIRMAN
Approved by BCC
ATTEST:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and
Comptroller
Deputy Clerk
r
to orm d Leg Sufficiency:
4.
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
2014.
ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
(Si atu e)
D N J. ZRAL CK, P.E., BRANCH MANAGER
Witnessed by:
(Printed name)
v
seph A. lbaird, County Administrator
F:\Engineering\Capital Projects\Annual Geotechnical Services Contract\2014 Extension of Agreement 02-11-2014\AMENDMENT NO, 2 ARDAMAN &
ASSOCIATES.doc
31
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. AND INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
This is Amendment No. 2 to the existing Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Geotechnical Services
(AGREEMENT) dated March 10, 2010 between Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc.
(CONSULTANT) and Indian River County (COUNTY) and renewed for the third and final year for the
period March 3, 2013 through March 2, 2014:
WHEREAS, the existing AGREEMENT between CONSULTANT and COUNTY provides the final
third -year executed renewal to expire on March 2, 2014, this Amendment No. 2 extends the expiration
date until September 30, 2014. Current approved fees and hourly rates will remain unchanged.
This AMENDMENT NO. 2, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed
according to the laws of the State of Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents this
day of
OWNER
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
(Signature)
PETER D. O'BRYAN, CHAIRMAN
Approved by BCC
ATTEST:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and
Comptroller
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to F rm and Le I efficiency:
&W 4 -, - A, /W/
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
2014.
DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING AND
TESTING, INC.
�Sign;ture)
CRAIG E. DUNKELBERGER, AE
SENIOR ASSOCIATE
Witnessed by:
__FWqVU_4
(Printed name)
ph A. Paird, County Administrator
F:\Engineering\Capital Projects\Annual Geotechnical Services Contract\2014 Extension of Agreement 02-11-2014\AMENDMENT NO.2
DUNKELBERGER.doc
32
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
AMENDMENT NO.2 TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN GFA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
This is Amendment No. 2 to the existing Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Geotechnical Services
(AGREEMENT) dated March 10, 2010 between GFA International, Inc. (CONSULTANT) and Indian River
County (COUNTY) and renewed for the third and final year for the period March 3, 2013 through March
2, 2014:
WHEREAS, the existing AGREEMENT between CONSULTANT and COUNTY provides the final
third -year executed renewal to expire on March 2, 2014, this Amendment No. 2 extends the expiration
date until September 30, 2014. Current approved fees and hourly rates will remain unchanged.
This AMENDMENT NO. 2, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed
according to the laws of the State of Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents this
Ljpn day of F1° t u n ru 12014.
OWNER
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
(Signature)
PETER D. O'BRYAN, CHAIRMAN
Approved by BCC
ATTEST:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and
Comptroller
Deputy Clerk
GFA INTERWIONAL, INC.
(Sh,} ature)
DAVID ALKER, PROJECT COORDINATOR
r
Approved as to Form and Legal ufficiency:
4/_ I Dylan Reingold, County Attorney ?0sep—h"Alaird, County Admini trator
F:\Engineering\Capital Projects\Annual Geotechnical Services Contract\2014 Extension of Agreement 02-11-2014\AMENDMENT NO.2 GFA
INTERNATIONAL.doc
Kit]
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MASTER AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING SERVICES BETWEEN KSM ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
This is Amendment No. 2 to the existing Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Geotechnical Services
(AGREEMENT) dated March 10, 2010 between KSM Engineering & Testing, Inc. (CONSULTANT) and
Indian River County (COUNTY) and renewed for the third and final year for the period March 3, 2013
through March 2, 2014:
WHEREAS, the existing AGREEMENT between CONSULTANT and COUNTY provides the final
third -year executed renewal to expire on March 2, 2014, this Amendment No. 2 extends the expiration
date until September 30, 2014. Current approved fees and hourly rates will remain unchanged.
This AMENDMENT NO. 2, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and construed
according to the laws of the State of Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents this
day of,
OWNER
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
(Signature)
PETER D. O'BRYAN, CHAIRMAN
Approved by BCC
ATTEST:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and
Comptroller
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to Form and Legal fficiency:
A.
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
2014.
KSM ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC.
Signature
LLER, P.E., PRESIDENT
Witn ssed by:
(Printed name)
-40
?ff\.n
seph A Baird, County Adminis rator
F:\Engineering\Capital Projects\Annual Geotechnical Services Contract\2014 Extension of Agreement 02-11-2014\AMENDMENT N0.2 KSM
ENGMERING.doe
34
Consent Aaenda
Indian River County
Interoffice Memorandum 7
Office of Management & Budget
To: Members of the Board of u Commissioners
From: Jason E. Brown
Director, Office of Managem -in & udget
Date: February 12, 2014
Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 006
Description and Conditions
The attached budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following:
1. On February 11, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Sheriffs Office
purchasing replacement vehicles in the amount of $800,000. Funding will be provided by
Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 1St
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached budget resolution
amending the fiscal year 2013/2014 budget.
Attachments
Budget Amendment 006 and Resolution
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM:
BY. ,,
&aky'4
Jos h A. Baird
County Administrator
FOR: February 18, 2014
Indian River County
Aooroved
Date
Administrator
JI '
Legal
Budget
Department
Risk Management
U-1
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014 BUDGET.
WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the
adopted Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to
section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
desires to amend the fiscal year 2013-2014 budget, as more specifically set forth
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year
2013-2014 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon
adoption of this Resolution.
This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
, and the motion was seconded by Commissioner ,
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan
Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis
Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher
Commissioner Bob Solari
Commissioner Tim Zorc
The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted
this day of , 2014.
Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith
Clerk of Court and Comptroller
LM
Deputy Clerk
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Board of County Commissioners
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM
;ANDLEGAL SUFFICIEN Y
BY
COUNTY ATTORNEY
36
Resolution No. 2014-7—
Budget Office Approval: Budget Amendment: 006
Jason I./I.nrown,Pu,
Entry
Number
Fund/ Depa
en ount Name
LM 2-1c
Account Number
I ncrease
Decrease
1.
Revenue
Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward -Oct 1 st
315039-389040
$800,000
$0
Expense
Optional Sales Tax/Sheriff-Law Enforcement
31560086-099040
$800,000
$0
37
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney
Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney
CONSENT AGENDA: 2/18/2014
Office of
INDIAN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: William K. DeBraal — Deputy County Attorrl)y�l
THROUGH: Dylan Reingold — County Attorney
DATE: February 12, 2014
RIVER COUNTY
ATTORNEY
19 G -
SUBJECT: Resolution Formally Designating a Portion of County Owned Property as
86th Lane Right -Of -Way
In January, 2014, the County purchased a parcel of property from the List of Lands
Available after recommendation by the Public Works Department because a portion of
the property was being used as a road segment, known as 86th Lane, but under private
ownership, with at least 15 parcels abutting the segment.
The intent of the County is to now earmark by a formal document that portion of the
property for 86th Lane right-of-way in order to alleviate any potential ingress/egress and
boundary issues that may surface in the future in the event that the remainder property
is sold or reconveyed and put back on the tax rolls. In this regard, a resolution has been
prepared for the above stated purpose.
FUNDING:
The only cost associated with this matter will be recording fees for recordation of the
resolution in the amount of $44.00. Funding for this expenditure is budgeted and
available in Secondary Roads/Right-Of-Way Account No. 10921441-066120.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached resolution, and authorize the Chairman to execute same for
recordation in the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
nhm
Attachment
cc: Jacqui Gilbert — Mapping Section, IRC Property Appraiser's Office
Z 4e
a-
.-I COVED FOR
.C.O IOEETI " t�NT AGENDA
; , !NfTY ATTORNEY _
RESOLUTION NO, 2014-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, FORMALLY DESIGNATING CERTAIN
COUNTY OWNED PROPERTY FOR 86TH LANE
RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND DIRECTING THE
PROPERTY APPRAISER TO CUT OUT THE
PROPERTY DESIGNATED AS RIGHT-OF-WAY
FROM THE PARENT PARCEL.
WHEREAS, on January 7, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County purchased a parcel of property from the List of Lands
Available and identified as Tax Parcel No. 31-39-29-00000-5000-00096.0; said
conveyance was by Tax Deed and recorded in Book 2730 at Page 722 of the
Public Records of Indian River County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of purchasing the property was due to it being
used as a road segment, known as 86th Lane, but under private ownership, with
at least 15 parcels abutting this segment; and
WHEREAS, the intent of the County is to now earmark by a formal
document that portion of the property for 86th Lane right-of-way in the event that
the remainder is eventually sold or reconveyed and put back on the tax rolls; and
WHEREAS, a sketch and legal description of the right-of-way have been
prepared and are attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, a sketch and legal description have been prepared for the
remainder property and are attached hereto as Exhibit "B"; and
1
39
RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -
WHEREAS, it would be beneficial to designate by a recorded instrument
the County's designation of this 86th Lane right-of-way identified in the attached
Exhibit "A" so that the Indian River County Property Appraiser can earmark the
property as 86th Lane right-of-way on the appropriate maps, as well as cut out the
designated right-of-way from the parent parcel, thus alleviating any potential
ingress/egress and boundary issues that may surface in the future in the event
that the remainder property, identified in the attached Exhibit "B" is sold or
reconveyed,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
1. The portion of property as described and depicted on the attached
Exhibit 'A," is hereby formally designated as 86th Lane right-of-way;
and
2. This resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of Indian River
County, Florida; and
3. Upon the recordation of this Resolution, the Indian River County
Property Appraiser is instructed to cut out the designated right-of-way
as depicted and described on the attached Exhibit "A" from the parent
parcel, and accordingly earmark any maps within the Property
Appraiser's Office to reflect this designation.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner and
the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a
vote, the vote was as follows:
2
40
RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -
Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan
Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis
Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher
Commissioner Tim Zorc
Commissioner Bob Solari
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this day of _ , 2014.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk
of Court and Comptroller
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FOR
AND L G L SUFF1
BY WILLIAM K. DESMAL
pEPUTYCOUNTY ATTORNEY
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman
3
41
EXHIBIT "A" - 42
YI-YL-I 9NO'OS34-NOL3NS M FLL9D-ISOC\OMO\3�V LI149 JO 3 M NtSS-%SOC\AMUAS\SL03rONd OSIN-ISOC\SLO�t
3rOWd NOISNIO ONlbMNl*NASXww WW\.J
z
Z
O
W
N X
6Z NOLL03S 30 VMS 30 tr/L3S 30 3NIl 3
p
w_
O
~ O O
O
O
SZZ H1ki0N I
w p r
� W
SL H1f10S
w
F
z p J
Z
Z
.-.
N
SL OZ
W Q cn
on W
2
w U
J
0
W F- n'
CW
�D
i
¢m F-
wM
ZNQ'
n
v o
f
vVi
0
z
0 0�
ui
HQ�
00
Ln O
�L
Z y
a Z
N Oj tU.i
00 U
--,LLJ
0�4
3 0 a�
a w
ai
F N Q
Y
Ci
- z
a
z
o zo O
v)
�-
�x Lv
z�
NV�f�
w W
O
F -4
6Z NOLL03S 30 tr IMS 30 tr/L3S
i0 4/ ON
FO m w
m
F-w to
30 Nll M
4S O w
w O
ro N 0 VI
OZ LU �\
pp
u m
W�` 3
W
M
Li
z
in
F-
hw
U7
OV
LL_
O
Z tY O
O
= H< tl1
0 M
N
Z� w
O
w
�
O OO
F- 0)O
N
Z
O
JQ
=
N
w
W
h \
FLLJ Z
N
Z 0,6
5 ,. L- N
LL
"
=)La,
W In � O
0
Z
0
0 LLJ Z
O0 L+..O
F-
LU
O O m
�ui = Q
V
am�
W
\
3
F-
W r7 H
z O W
Lyi,
Li
W F_ Lr
L`
> 0
m
o LY
OF- m
o
o
w>
O
O0on
cc=n
i
wrn
U
roF-
20�
z
�
0O
�\Q
Ql
o
a
<0
\
W
O
2 Q
O f- V) cx
F_
�
0
N
J
QU 00 =
UJ
3
LLJ L,
3ZZ VI
J
Z W W d 0
O
W
W WV) �
M: 3:
rn
Z
im� h=-\
F
0
M
3
•�
Z
O
� 0 0 0
U
W QUWI.-
.i1
w� ZWm0
C))
F -W JF_-fkf
J F- w
C
L N
W<
,�
L
OQ -i or
O0 o<lm
CD
0
mQ
.£0'L£ HlnOS
0—mw
F z W—
Q
,_
C
3o OM olzlx0w¢-
�,�`
m
c
W
Dw whw"amLW`
L"�"'� dd-
O
r,
00 Z0
Z�00
`
,£0'LO I H18ON
w
Z O Z -j Z O w Z
0
l
,Nr
wWw5 00
o6x� r -:op
(
60
o
z
W
cn w W_
z =z=IZZ
00
CL(n W CL U_ U
O
m
a-
�zN�a((A
WW
a o
Q�wZ
0Zw0W=00
LJ XLJ z
f -m
t (1-aw �
n -a a
z� z�Zz
Z
Qd
o: O
zLj
o
5F5.,m
QO�a5-ate
O
��v
<� `^
=0 =003:Z
Z z Z �
F-
Q
0cr-
W w
�q{U{--
j a w
LFU-
tilQQrj NWO
UOf
42Z
o'a,
(OV02A NOiMie) 3nN3AV H1 -V9
(nnL1 x vv)) Jmcnw
m
LL_¢
$ �6Z
N011035 30 trjiMS 30 tr/l3S 30 3NIl M
V1
to 0 OvI
w
w
_
Q'
R ^ �,
02DZ
�ZLLJ ,L- L F-- Oho
U
iO0
(n d4.Z
z
�M(nNQQL'7tw
z
EXHIBIT "A" - 42
m
m
EXHIBIT "B" 43
.,(�
YI-YZ-I OMO'J53O-HJ13N5 M H .-tSO£\5ft \3AV ILL" 30 3 M ML4D-1SOS\A31YfL5\S1J3f0ad =M-lSOC\SL33mMd NMKO JNOl33NN1ON3\S)lVW OnW,d\:!
Z
l -
W
XO
z 0 M
O
x
6Z NOLL335 30 4/1M5 30 ti/l3S 30 3NII 3
—
„�
LLJ
Z \
N
O
3 a
�O
U
N
O
WO o=
LLJ
G
SZZ H12ION
I
(n Z O
O
.-.
E-
M Q w
p F -
w
SL HUtOS
1
0 w F M
Q
W
N
oz
z
s oa
F-
z
0
\wI
N
wov
XZ
�a
LL)
3
a�
�aW
W
O
0 0
V) N f'
O
W
Ute =
O
ct�LO
4
\�
M N N
d W
U
Z y
a. L) F-
°- Y
V1
00
O
VQ ZF
O
N
o
tat
U
Z LL w w
O
�i
oL
z
N
o w F N
~ ti Lt
U
F"L+
h
6Z Naua3S 30 b/LMS d0 tl/las
0
N � Q o w
a
i,/LMS
30 l3N
30 iNn M
z
a
Zw\ H
O w
w
�d
i -+-i
1
tL
lf}
3.
w
3
w -j
(n La z`w �
N
O
zOf Q F C] p
Z M
Caa OOwp o
F rn
�
Z p {t} d
U N
w
CD N
Z
JQ w\ F
V)
W
0
Z
N
F=.-
zQ w Z 3
D
wZ
JQp OHO w
m
=
w
V)
w
U
a
a �� �w>
mom=
°F
Dote 0
F--
Om��
3
'^
0 �
w ¢z \Q w
Z
Q
ao
O
fl ° o F- o a
\
J QU �ZZ Q
Q
N
w
Lil
Z
O
Wwlj
Vl
N
Li
-� LO LLQ F- I- W J
L
0
U..Q..]
p3
LLS
•�'
>
=
ED
Q LJ
m []Cn C] O
U
Z
Fw- QOUwt-
wU) ZwMO
Z
.0
•m
LLI
¢_�ccz¢
�q p
Op to<(n
DU Q�
_- -mow
F -K w -ZWCC
O LJZ-teD
3-1
_C
py
U=oa'--
W�QF-�
w
d
C
ow J
Q
Q�
p
W
=
>F oOXZO (n �.
�
00
.L
00 NMO Z
00
ortizWwz O
�
£0'L8l Hi8ON
(n 6 0 CL
m m r o ul
z
Ld
z� S z 2 j ZZ CL
oQo2F-foo z
pO
9_
a�waa aU
E<M-0of �
H
ZVI
m
s
O
U Z U U)O
-i (n F- Q- V) w
Z
a
W
pZwauJ=0LU � Q
�-
�Q�
NWrn�
O�CLp WUpCe
a Z 0-
��O
2 -no
a� m
ao�za�-a0 p
trU
<V14I
=Q =Op=z f- Z
UZo0�w0E- Q
ML
Uts.iW
�^�w
ZNw
ViLL, V
�ir>
'o mN
(%� O (n ) Cn w —YU.J XU
Q
0: ice, .n..
(Cl d02� NOlX02�8) £o c£ 3f1N3A�/ Hlt,9
w
i Q>= J w= 3 0
E d
6Z NO1133S 30 */LMS 30 4/t3S 30 3NIl M
H-
F- Z F- a F- � o W
U
Q O p
Z
a
Z
(n
�t/i(nNQQMtnN
�4
z
EXHIBIT "B" 43
Indian River County
FEB 12 2014
Office of the
County Administrator
Leslie R. Swan
Supervisor ofElections i
February 3, 2014 Indian River County
The Honorable Peter O'Bryan, Chairman
Board of county Commissioners
Indian River County
180027 th Street, Building A
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Dear Chairman O'Bryan:
On March 5, 2013, 1 appeared before the Board of County Commissioners to inform the Board that
by the year 2016, the Supervisor of Elections office would be required to purchase and implement a
new voting system to be in compliance with current election laws. At the time of my presentation,
Florida Statute 101.56075 stated, "By the year 2016, persons with disabilities shall vote on a voter
interface device that meets the voter accessibility requirements for individuals with disabilities under
s. 301 of the Federal Help America Vote Act of 2002." Simple interpretation, persons with
disabilities shall have the opportunity to vote, unassisted, utilizing a paper ballot.
Currently, persons with disabilities in Indian River County have the option of voting on a
touchscreen voting machine. The touchscreen unit allows voters to cast their ballot electronically,
there is no paper ballot. Our Sequoia Edge touchscreen voting machines do not meet the paper
ballot mandate indicated in the above statute.
At the conclusion of the 2013 Legislative session, new legislation was enacted which pushed back
the deadline for implementation of F.S. 101.56075 to the year 2020. This new deadline is good
news for Indian River County and gives our county some breathing room before we are mandated
to purchase a new voting system.
During my March 5, 2013 presentation to the Board, I expressed concerns in reference to obtaining
replacement memory packs for our existing optical scan voting equipment. Indian River County
does not have a large supply of back-up memory packs. In November of 2012 following the General
Election, I contacted our vendor to purchase additional memory packs for our voting equipment,
and the representative informed me: "I've had the team hunt for additional inventory but it looks
like the remaining inventory is being held as warranty replacements and cannot be used for ne
sales."
ay d-
'` ARK FL 32967 1 Office: (772) 226-3440 Fax: (772) 770 536ff
February 3, 2014
Page Two (2)
Without a sufficient supply of back-up memory packs, Indian River County is left in a vulnerable
position. I recently made another attempt to attain additional memory packs from our vendor. On
January 20, 2014, 1 received an email from our representative at Dominion Voting stating he was
able to acquire 17 memory packs. I am in the process of purchasing the 17 additional "back-up"
memory packs. As a standard practice, we send these refurbished memory packs to the Bureau of
Voting Systems Certification in Tallahassee to be tested before Indian River County can accept the
cartridges for use in our tabulation system.
I have also taken several precautionary measures to assure our voting equipment is well
maintained. In June 2011, my staff shipped all of our optical scan memory packs to our vendor's
facility in California, to be inspected and serviced, including replacing their internal batteries. This
past October, I arranged to have our vendor travel to our facility and perform preventive
maintenance on all 65 of our optical scan voting machines and two 400C high-speed ballot
counters. I now feel confident that Indian River County can utilize our current voting system
through the 2016 presidential election.
In 2017, Indian River County's 400C high speed counters and touchscreen voting equipment will be
(Iiiw 15 years old and our optical scan voting machines will be 9 years old. I believe our county can put
off purchasing a new voting system until FY 2016 - 2017. This postponement also leaves additional
time for funds to be set aside during the ensuing fiscal years for this necessary expenditure.
Our county is rapidly moving toward 100,000 registered voters and should surpass that number
prior to the end of this year. As our numbers grow, so will our equipment needs. The extension of
time to purchase a new voting system will allow our county to thoroughly research all of our vendor
options and projected equipment needs for the future.
Further, Indian River County was one of the original counties to purchase electronic poll books
(EViD's) which greatly enhance the speed and accuracy of checking -in voters at the polling location.
The use of EViD's is one reason why the voters in Indian River County do not have to wait in long
lines to vote. Indian River County has a total of 115 electronic poll books which were deployed
during the 2012 Presidential election. The retirement date for IRC's original 59 EViD units is rapidly
approaching and Indian River County must begin the process of acquiring new EViD's in the coming
years. Once the retirement date is reached on an EViD, the vendor will no longer support the
equipment (service, parts, etc...). During the coming fiscal years, our office plans to budget money
to purchase replacement EViD's for those approaching their retirement date.
45
February 3, 2103
Page Three (3)
Our supply of EViD's has served our county well and will continue to enhance efficiency at the
polling location for the voters in Indian River County.
Sincerely,
Y`---) t-��
Leslie R. Swan
Supervisor of Elections
Enclosures
cc: Commissioner Wesley Davis
Commissioner Joseph Flescher
Commissioner Bob Solari
Commissioner Tim Zorc
County Administrator Joe Baird
46
BACKGROUND: VOTING SYSTEMS IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
2000 — Present
I want to provide you with some background detailing legislation that has affected
voting equipment in Florida during the last several years.
In 2001, the Legislature passed the Comprehensive Election Reform Act which
banned punch card voting machines. In 2002, Indian River County purchased a
new voting system utilizing touchscreen voting equipment at all polling
locations. Indian River County paid $1,832,563 for the new voting technology
from Sequoia Voting Systems which included voting equipment, software and
firmware.
During the 2007 Legislative session, House Bill 537 was passed and it required
counties in Florida to use mark sense ballots (paper ballots) for precinct and
early voting sites. It also required a touchscreen voting machine at each precinct
and early voting site for voters with disabilities.
The Legislature in 2007 provided money for Indian River County to purchase 54
optical scanners and to lease one Ballot -On -Demand printer to be used for early
voting. The State gave Indian River County $310,500 to buy 54 optical scanners.
That amounted to one optical scanner per precinct with none for training or
back-up. A separate grant in the amount of $45,565.81 was available for leasing
one Ballot -On -Demand printer for early voting/absentee printing needs and
$17,250 for three optical scanners for early voting.
At the time, the Department of State knew that the voting system equipment
was and still is "vendor specific," and the Legislature did not intend for counties
to buy a whole new voting system. The optical scanners were just one
component of a voting system. (As I stated above, Indian River County paid
approximately $2 million dollars in 2002 for an entire new voting system.)
In 2007, Indian River County already had the Sequoia software for the tabulation
system, the ballot layout software, the hardware and software to count
absentee ballots, and we had the touchscreen voting machines needed to use in
each precinct and early voting site for voters with disabilities. The major
component that was missing from Indian River County's voting system was the
optical scan voting equipment and software to tabulate paper ballots.
47
Background
Page Two (2)
Legislation also passed in 2007 included Florida Statute 101.56075 (3) which
stipulated "By 2012, persons with disabilities shall vote on a voter interface
device that meets the voter accessibility requirements for individuals with
disabilities under s. 301 of the federal Help America Vote Act of 2002.
Under the assumption that by 2012, Indian River County would be required to
purchase new voting equipment for persons with disabilities to comply with
Florida Statute 101.56075, it made no sense for Indian River County to purchase
a whole new voting system at the time. Indian River County chose to upgrade
their current Sequoia voting system to comply with Nouse Bill 537 mandating the
use of mark sense ballots (paper ballots) instead of purchasing a whole new
voting system. The total cost for implementation of the Sequoia paper ballot
voting component in 2008 was $685,565.
In 2010, due to the lobbying efforts of the Florida State Association of
Supervisors of Elections, the Florida Legislature voted to delay implementation
of F.S. 101.56075 — By the year 2016, persons with disabilities shall vote on a
voter interface device that meets the voter accessibility requirements for
individuals with disabilities under s. 301. of the federal Help America Vote Act of
2002." Counties throughout Florida have either installed voting equipment that
satisfies the requirements of F.S. 101.56075 or are in the process of funding and
purchasing a voting system that complies with F.S. 101.56075.
Also in 2010, Sequoia Voting Systems was acquired by Dominion Voting, Inc.
Dominion Voting, Inc. has no device that meets the Legislative mandate outlined
in F.S. 101.56075 that is compatible with Indian River County's current voting
system, thus Indian River County would be required to purchase a new voting
system in the near future.
During the 2013 Legislative session, the Florida Legislature again voted to delay
implementation of F.S. 101.56075 — By the year 2020, persons with disabilities
shall vote on a voter interface device that meets the voter accessibility
requirements for individuals with disabilities under s. 301. of the federal Help
America Vote Act of 2002."
48
Leslie Swan
From: Jay Bollenbacher <jay.bollenbacher@dominionvoting.com>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 11:06 AM
To: Leslie Swan
Subject. RE: Sequoia Insight
Leslie,
Good newsl I was able to acquire and place on hold 17 memory packs so I need to know if you want to go ahead and
purchase all 17. Please advise as soon as possible. I'm also working on pricing so I should have that shortly.
JAY BOLLENBACHER I ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE
DOMINION VOTING
8750 Gladiolus Drive, Suite 11-121, Fort Myers, Florida 33908
1.866.654.8683 1 DOMINIONVOTING.COM
239.220.0138 MOBILE
866.729.1783 FAX
49
Select Year: 2013 V Go
The 2013 Florida Statutes
Title IX Chapter 101 View Entire Chapter
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE
101.56075 Voting methods.—
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), all voting shall be by marksense ballot utilizing a marking
device for the purpose of designating ballot selections.
(2) Persons with disabilities may vote on a voter interface device that meets the voting system
accessibility requirements for individuals with disabilities pursuant to s. 301 of the federal Help America
Vote Act of 2002 and s. 101.56062.
(3) By 2020, persons with disabilities shall vote on a voter interface device that meets the voter
accessibility requirements for individuals with disabilities under s. 301 of the federal Help America Vote
Act of 2002 and s. 101.56062 which are consistent with subsection (1) of this section.
History.—s. 6, ch. 2007.30; s. 5, ch. 2010-167; s. 33, ch. 2011-40; s. 9, ch. 2013-57.
Copyright ®1995-2014 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us
http://Www.leg.state.fl.uslstatutes/index.cfm?App_ node=Display_Statute&URL=0100-01... 1/28/2014
50
Select Year: 2013 V Go
The 2013 Florida Statutes
Title IX Chanter 101 View Entire Chaster
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE
101.56062 Standards for accessible voting systems.—
(1) Notwithstanding anything in this chapter to the contrary, each voting system certified by the
Department of State for use in local, state, and federal elections must include the capability to install
accessible voter interface devices in the system configuration which will allow the system to meet the
following minimum standards:
(a) The voting system must provide a tactile input or audio input device, or both.
(b) The voting system must provide a method by which voters can confirm any tactile or audio input
by having the capability of audio output using synthetic or recorded human speech that is reasonably
phonetically accurate.
(c) Any operable controls on the input device which are needed for voters who are visually impaired
must be discernible tactilely without actuating the keys.
(d) Audio and visual access approaches must be able to work both separately and simultaneously.
(e) If a nonaudio access approach is provided, the system may not require color perception. The
system must use black text or graphics, or both, on white background or white text or graphics, or both,
on black background, unless the office of the Secretary of State approves other high-contrast color
combinations that do not require color perception.
(f) Any voting system that requires any visual perception must offer the election official who
programs the system, prior to its being sent to the polling place, the capability to set the font size, as it
appears to the voter, from a minimum of 14 points to a maximum of 24 points.
(g) The voting system must provide audio information, including any audio output using synthetic or
recorded human speech or any auditory feedback tones that are important for the use of the audio
approach, through at least one mode, by handset or headset, in enhanced auditory fashion (increased
amplification), and must provide incremental volume control with output amplification up to a level of
at least 97 dB SPL.
(h) For transmitted voice signals to the voter, the voting system must provide a gain adjustable up
to a minimum of 20 dB with at least one intermediate step of 12 dB of gain.
(i) For the safety of others, if the voting system has the possibility of exceeding 120 dB SPL, then a
mechanism must be included to reset the volume automatically to the voting system's default volume
level after every use, for example when the handset is replaced, but not before. Also, universal
precautions in the use and sharing of headsets should be followed.
(j) If sound cues and audible information such as "beeps" are used, there must be simultaneous
corresponding visual cues and information.
(k) Controls and operable mechanisms must be operable with one hand, including operability with a
closed fist, and operable without tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist.
(t) The force required to operate or activate the controls must be no greater than 5 pounds of force.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfin?App_Mode=Display_Statute&Search String=... 1/28/2014
51
UKiiiLtVJ w VVaaJiaLKUVaa . ♦ aV YT •.JiKiK iVJ . VtalaaaV VKaaJaaaaly
(m) Voting booths must have voting controls at a minimum height of 36 inches above the finished
floor with a minimum knee clearance of 27 inches high, 30 inches wide, and 19 inches deep, or the
accessible voter interface devices must be designed so as to allow their use on top of a table to meet
these requirements. Tabletop installations must include adequate privacy.
(n) Any audio ballot must provide the voter with the following functionalities:
1. After the initial instructions that the system requires election officials to provide to each voter,
the voter should be able to independently operate the voter interface through the final step of casting a
ballot without assistance.
2. The voter must be able to determine the races that he or she is allowed to vote in and to
determine which candidates are available in each race.
3. The voter must be able to determine how many candidates may be selected in each race.
4. The voter must be able to have confidence that the physical or vocal inputs given to the system
have selected the candidates that he or she intended to select.
5. The voter must be able to review the candidate selections that he or she has made.
6. Prior to the act of casting the ballot, the voter must be able to change any selections previously
made and confirm a new selection.
7. The system must communicate to the voter the fact that the voter has failed to vote in a race or
has failed to vote the number of allowable candidates in any race and require the voter to confirm his or
her intent to undervote before casting the ballot.
8. The system must prevent the voter from overvoting any race.
9. The voter must be able to input a candidate's name in each race that allows a write-in candidate.
10. The voter must be able to review his or her write-in input to the interface, edit that input, and
confirm that the edits meet the voter's intent.
11. There must be a clear, identifiable action that the voter takes to "cast" the ballot. The system
must make clear to the voter how to take this action so that the voter has minimal risk of taking the
action accidentally but, when the voter intends to cast the ballot, the action can be easily performed.
12. Once the ballot is cast, the system must confirm to the voter that the action has occurred and
that the voter's process of voting is complete.
13. Once the ballot is cast, the system must preclude the voter from modifying the ballot cast or
voting or casting another ballot.
The functionalities required in this paragraph for certification may be satisfied by either the voting
device or by the entire voting system.
(2) Such voting system must include at least one accessible voter interface device installed in each
polling place which meets the requirements of this section, except for paragraph (1)(d).
History.—s. 12, ch. 2002-281; s. 34, ch. 2005-278; s. 1, ch. 2006-111; s. 27, ch. 2012-116.
Copyright ®1995-2014 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us
http://wvwv.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=... 1/28/2014
52
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:33 AM
To: Jay Bollenbacher
Cc: Gary Gordon
Subject: FW: Sequoia Insight
lIiiiw Jay,
I was wondering if you know of any of your customers who may be upgrading their Sequoia
Insights to your new voting system and want to sell any memory packs to help us along until
we purchase a new voting system? The memory packs must comply with the specifications
that David Drury listed below.
If you don't know of any of your current customers trading in their Sequoia Insights, can be
give me the names of any of your customers who are utilizing our existing memory packs (with
our firmware) that we could possibly formulate an agreement that we could lend each other
some memory packs in case of an emergency?
Thank you for your assistance.
Leslie
Leslie Rosswat - S -s► -a tt, CERA
iiliiw Supervisor of Elections
Indian River Cctetn�
k
437: 43r`t Avenue �� 4
Voss Bench, FL 32967
Phone: (772) 226-343:+
Max: (772) 770.0-+367
Email: LSwan@voteindianriver.com
Web: www.VoteindianRiver.com
91 `ir,;J LS 01'
Faceboo
Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Written communications to or from government officials regarding business
constitute public records and are available to the public and media upon request unless the information is subject to a specific statutory
exemption. Therefore, your e-mail message as well as the information on this form and our personal records may be subject to public
disclosure.
53
Leslie Swan
From: Jay Bollenbacher <jay.bollenbacher@dominionvoting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 9:29 AM
To: Tricia Verdugo
Cc: Leslie Swan
Subject: RE: Insight Memory Packs- Price inquiry
Tricia,
Unfortunately this is something that we do not have in stock.
JAY BOLLENBACHER I ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE
DOMINION VOTING
2010 N. Redbud Blvd., Suite 110, MCKINNEY, 7X 75069
1.866.654.86831 DOMINIONVOTING.COM
239.220.0138 MOBILE
866.729.1783 FAX
From: Tricia Verdugo[mailto:tverdugoCalvoteindianriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:47 AM
To: Jay Bollenbacher
Cc: Leslie Swan
Subject: Insight Memory Packs- Price inquiry
iIIiiw Hi Jay,
Indian River County would like to order spare memory packs (cartridges) for the 65 insights we currently have. Can you
please provide me with a price quote for 65 memory packs?
Thanks very much,
TrU;.a• V e rdAA-go-
Accounting & Operations Coordinator
Indian River County
Supervisor of Elections
4375 43rd Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32967
(772)-226-3443
(772)-770-5367 (Fax)
www.voteindianriver.com
10 find us on
acebook
Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in
response to a public -records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by
IIIiiw phone or in writing. --F.S. 668.606
1
54
Leslie Swan
Frown: Gary Gordon
sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 825 AM
TO: Leslie Swan
Subject: FW.. Memory Pack Insight
ul
Gary Gordon
i7 Manager, CERA
Supervisor of Elections Indian River County
4375 43rd Avenue
Vero Beach, FL 32967
772-226-3438 direct
772-77133367 fax
Emal1: Qpordonlbyofalndiandver core
Website: www.vofelndianrivercom
0 Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public reoords. N you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public -records
request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. —F.S. 668.608
From: Jay Bollenbadler[mailtio:iay.bollenbacherrBdominLQmm iro mW
Sent Monday, December 03, 2012 6:40 AM
To: Gary Gordon
Subject RE: Memory Pads Insight
Gary,
I've had the team hunt for additional inventory but it looks like the remaining inventory Is being held as warranty replacements and cannot be used for new
sales.
JAY aOLLENBACHER I CUSTOMER RELATIONS MANAGER
DOWUNION VOTING
MOM ReddM BINd.. Su" 110 AAMNNEY. T.{ 75054
f.80QB".8887 I DOMIN01"TING.CCM
232MM0138 MOBILE
866.724.1783 FAX
Fran: Gary Gordon [a1WftQ90aordonQvDteIndIanniver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:25 AM
To: Jay Bollenbadter
Subject RE: Memory Pad Insight
Around 40 packs
Gary Gordon
IT Manager, CERA
Indian River County SOE
4375 43rd Ave Vero Beach, FL 32967
772.226.3438 direct
772.770.5367 fax
ooadon0voteindiandvB17.0001
www.voteindiandyer com
Under Florida law, e -mall addresses are public records. N you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public -records request,
Do not send electronic inall to this entity. Instead, Contact this office by phone or in writing.
— F.S. 668.606
Fran. Jay Bollenbadler [=IIto: jW.bollenbacher®domin
Sent Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:23 AM
To: Gary Gordon
Subject RE: Memory Pack Insight
Suret
Now many are you looking for?
JAY BOLLENBACHER I CUSTOMER RELATIONS MANAGER
DOMINION VOTING
2010X. RadbM 8M1.. SIW& 110. MWONNEY. TK 75050
r.886.854.WM I DOMINONJOTiNG.COM
234220.0138 MOBILE
466.724.1783 FAX
from: Gary Gordon Imalftomoorcloniftobalincilarurtyermml
Seth Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:03 AM
To: Jay Bolk:nbadter
Subject Memory Pack Insight
Jay.
We are Interested in obtaining some more Memory packs for the Insights. Could you quote use a price for them?
55
106_ -i -
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSION
REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this
form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Mee.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION
Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general role, public discussion
items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action
Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless
additional time is granted by the commission
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION:
ADDRESS: o2l AA RnGG rhe teal U if .PHONE: _7� 02`39-/—/ 9 C� 8 /--7§�5AC7YK
RrD36am, FL 3o29&D
SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: �C p� A TC pR/ aC✓W S,
Y
IS A PRESENTATION PLANNED?
IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED
IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION
WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU
REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION?
YES NO
FYES NO
YES NO
ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? = YES F�71 NO
WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE��
REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST?
Transmitted to Administrator Via
Interactive Web Form
E-mail
Fax
_ Mail
_ Hand Delivered
Phone
r
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOROr% .:� �,).% h
:
Joseph A. Baird
MEETING DATE: 9;201'Y
17
F:.CmmtytWmiDlFawcAM�AGEMAWaMcDbcunionIto=Fomidoc Bond AypowdIle7ft
Al'�
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION
REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this
form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION
Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion
items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action
Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless
additional time is granted by the commission
&kos le
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: G5, J %
ADDRESS: / _ ��r S PHONE:
SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: T�o . AC fc-_
IS A PRESENTATION PLANNED?
�
YES NO
IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED
YES F �7 NO
IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION
a
YES NO
WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU
REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION?
ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? YES NO
WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE
REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? A In
Transmitted to Administrator Via:
Interactive Web Form
E -Mail
Fax
Mail
Hand Delivered
Phone
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. I - -, J
Joseph A. Baird i'
MEETING DATE:
DocumenU Board Approved 11/7/06
57
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION
REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this
form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION
Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion
items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action
Indian River County Code Section 102.07 limit remarks to three minutes unless
additional time is granted by the commission
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: The Green Patrol
ADDRESS: 6350 65`s Street, Vero Beach, FL 32962 PHONE: 772.410.4720
SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: Helping with Green Certification / Green Heart Awards
IS A PRESENTATION PLANNED?
IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED
IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU Rather than send $5,000 to a bureaucracy out of town for a plaque, to
REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? invest $4000 in local green charities and businesses to conduct green
review and provide financial gains realized through "green" efforts.
ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? YES NO
WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE $4,000
REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST?
Transmitted to Administrator Via:
Interactive Web Form
x E -Mail
Fax
Mail
Hand Delivered
Phone
COUNTY ADMINISTRAT]28/
k- & , J
2014 Joseph A. Baird
MEETING DATE:
58
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP; Chief, Current evelopinent
DATE: February 7, 2014
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for Upcoming Board Meeting
It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 18, 2014.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Please be advised that the following public hearing item has been scheduled for Board consideration:
March 4, 2014
Windsor Properties request for abandonment of a 90' long sliver (343 sq. ft) portion of Savannah
Drive adjacent to a portion of Lot 1 & Tract A of Block 62 within Windsor Plat 25 [2002100039-
71226 / ROW -13-11-06] [Legislative]
RECOMMENDATION:
The above referenced public hearing item is provided for the Board's information. No action is needed at this
time.
Indian River Co. Approved I Date
Admin. I no I I . L 1'a /
Risk
FACommunity DevelopmentlCurDev\public hearings\BCC\2014\2-18-14 public hearing notice to board.doc 1
59
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA t�
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Stan Boling, ; Community Development Director
FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP 5
Chief, Long -Range Planning
DATE: February 5, 2014
SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for Upcoming Board Meeting
It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of
County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 18, 2014.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Please be advised that the following public hearing item has been scheduled for Board
consideration:
March 11, 2014
Consideration of an Ordinance to Temporarily Suspend Imposition of Three Impact Fees
for One Year or Until the Current Impact Fee Review is Completed and a New Impact Fee
Schedule is Approved and Becomes Effective, Whichever Occurs First.
RECOMMENDATION:
The above referenced public hearing item is provided for the Board's information. No action is
needed at this time.
FACommunity Development\Impact Fee\2014- IF Study\BCC Notice of 1 Public Hearings 2-18-2014.doc
60
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM:
Im
Indian River Co.
Approved Date
Admin.
Legal
Budget
13 J
jKLQ
Dept,
Risk Mgr.
F:\Community Development\Impact Fee\2014- IF Study\BCC Notice of I Public Hearings 2-18-2014.doc
61
IRDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEVELOPNIEN
MEMORANDUM
A
TO: Joseph A Baird; County Administrator
FROM: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director
DATE: February 3, 2014
SUBJECT: Request from Staff for Authorization to Initiate an LDR Amendment to Create
Special Overlay Regulations for the West Gifford Industrial and Commerce (WGIC)
Area on 163 Acres of Property in West Gifford Zoned IG (General Industrial)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 18, 2014.
BACKGROUND
On September 14, 2010, in response to a request from staff and the Gifford Executive Group to
address land use conflicts between industrial and residential properties in West Gifford, the Board of
County Commissioners authorized staff to initiate the formal process to create the West Gifford
�w Industrial & Commerce (WGIC) district and rezone 163 acres in West Gifford from IG (General
Industrial) to WGIC (see attachment #2). At the 2010 meeting, the Board considered draft WGIC
district regulations that retained most IG district uses, added a significant number of uses not allowed
in the IG district, and eliminated a number of uses that are allowed in the IG district. In essence, the
draft WGIC district regulations were structured to give affected property owners the right to develop
their properties with a number of new uses in exchange for eliminating the right to develop other
uses.
Since the Board's 2010 rezoning authorization, staff has coordinated with Gifford representatives,
affected property owners, and various interested parties. During that time, staff also conducted two
public workshops (affected property owners invited), drafted a number of changes to proposed
regulations, coordinated with the County Attorney's Office which held mediation meetings with
affected property owners and Gifford representatives, and obtained input during recent Gifford
Neighborhood Plan community meetings.
During the long coordination and planning process described above, no development project
applications for controversial uses (e.g. concrete plant, mulch operation, demolition debris facility)
were formally filed. In addition, during the process, the Attorney's Office mediation efforts resulted
in some consensus between property owners and Gifford representatives on a number of issues and
narrowed down the primary issue where no consensus was reached. That issue is whether or not to
allow three industrial uses in West Gifford: concrete plants, mulch operations, and demolition debris
facilities. Although no consensus was reached on that issue, mediation discussions indicated that
some degree of consensus may be possible if the three controversial uses are allowed only as
conditional uses with notice and public hearings (see last page of attachment #2).
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WG1C)\2014UPDATE\2-18-14 BCC.doc 1
62
Staff has concluded that, in order to move the West Gifford initiative forward, the county should
consider specially regulating those three uses within West Gifford rather than simply prohibiting
them as originally proposed. Staff has also concluded that adding uses, eliminating uses, and
specially regulating uses within West Gifford can be accomplished by a regulation overlay approach,
rather than by a rezoning approach. Based on meetings with property owners and Gifford
representatives, staff believes that the WGIC regulation overlay approach will be more acceptable to
affected property owners while still providing the same protections for Gifford residents that would
be provided by a WGIC rezoning approach. Consequently, staff has drafted an updated set of
overlay regulations for the West Gifford properties zoned IG (see attachment #5).
Because of the significant amount of time that has passed since the Board's 2010 rezoning
authorization, because the County should consider specially regulating rather than prohibiting certain
uses currently allowed, and because staff now believes that an overlay regulation approach rather
than a rezoning approach is more appropriate, staff requests that the Board consider the attached
updated set of draft overlay regulations for the 163 acres of West Gifford properties zoned IG and
authorize staff to initiate the formal process for adopting the draft regulations.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The area south of 47th Street and north of 41St Street lying between 43rd Avenue and 58th Avenue,
referred to as West Gifford, contains a significant amount of property zoned General Industrial (IG),
as well as adjacent property zoned IL (Light Industrial) and CH (Heavy Commercial) and nearby
properties zoned residential (see attachment #1). West Gifford is centrally located within the
county's urban area and is strategically located for a variety of industrial and commercial uses that
would benefit from West Gifford's convenient access to both the north and south areas of the county.
The IG zoned portion of West Gifford contains 163 acres of which 70 acres are vacant while the
remaining acreage is developed or partially developed with industrial and storage uses (50 acres),
salvage/junk yards (30 acres), and grand fathered -in residences including mobile homes (13 acres).
IG zoned properties in West Gifford have been industrially zoned for decades. Over the years,
residential uses slowly developed on properties near the IG zoned area, while industrial uses slowly
developed on the lands zoned industrial. The relatively close proximity of a number of residents to
IG zoned properties is unique to West Gifford. In fact, in West Gifford, there are a number of
grandfathered -in residences located within the IG zoned area. Currently, there are no concrete batch
plants or demolition debris sites in West Gifford, and there is one mulch operation.
+ History of Recent Industrial Land Use Conflicts
On June 29, 2007, staff conditionally approved a site plan for a concrete batch plant in West Gifford
for Prestige Concrete. As proposed, the project involved construction of a ready mix concrete batch
plant on the rear (south) 6 acres of a 9 acre property located at 5045 45th Street. Zoned IG, the
Prestige site is located in the middle of the 163 acre area IG zoned area. In the IG zoning district, a
concrete batch plant, like the Prestige plant, is a permitted use and requires only site plan approval,
with no special notice or public hearing. As approved with conditions, the 2007 site plan project met
all county development regulations, including IG zoning district, landscaping, buffering, stormwater
management, traffic, and environmental requirements. That site plan approval expired on June 29,
2010. The Prestige project is currently inactive although in recent years Prestige has made some
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\2-18-14 BCC.doc 2
63
properly permitted site preparations, has expressed an interest in developing a concrete batch plant in
the future, and has actively participated in West Gifford initiative meetings.
During the summer of 2009, staff received several inquiries from residents of the Gifford community
regarding the Prestige site plan approval. According to those residents, Gifford community members
had not been aware of the concrete plant site plan and had concerns about the proposed plant.
On August 19, 2009, community development staff met with Gifford Progressive Civic League
representatives, NAACP representatives, and Commissioner Joseph Flescher. At that meeting, staff
explained the process involved with review and approval of the Prestige site plan. Staff also noted
that, because the Prestige property was zoned IG and because a concrete plant is a permitted use in
the IG district, the county was required to approve the concrete plant site plan once the applicant
demonstrated that his site plan application complied with all applicable county codes.
Subsequent to the August 19, 2009 meeting, Joe Idlette, III, president of the Progressive Civic
League of Gifford, sent a letter to Community Development Director Robert Keating, requesting that
the county rezone all IG property in Gifford to IL (Light Industrial). According to that letter, the
Progressive Civic League was concerned that concrete plants and other similar IG uses would have
health, pollution, and safety impacts on the community. On September 25, 2009, Mr. Keating
responded to Mr. Idlette's letter, indicating that the rezoning request would be presented to the Board
for its consideration. On November 10, 2009, the Board considered a report and presentation from
Mr. Keating as well as comments from concerned area residents. After discussion, the Board
directed staff to perform research, work with Gifford community leaders and the community in
general regarding county regulation changes that address community concerns, and report back to the
Board with recommendations.
Consistent with the Board's direction, staff met with the "Gifford Executive Group" six times
between December 2009 and August 2010. The group originally consisted of Commissioner
Flescher, Michael Zito, Joe Idlette III, Tony Brown, Freddy Woolfork, Donald Hart, and Helene
Caseltine. After initial meetings, Mary McKinney, Vernon Reason, and Jeff Thompson (Vero
Millworks) also participated in Executive Group meetings.
Over the course of the meetings, the group reviewed staff research and analysis on land use, zoning,
and various development regulation alternatives to address community concerns. Based on that
information and analysis, staff, in coordination with the Executive Group, then drafted a set of
development regulation changes for the 163 acre portion of West Gifford currently zoned IG.
Throughout that process, Gifford residents provided input during community -wide meetings that
were held in Gifford in February and July 2010 to obtain community input.
Staff and the Executive Group then reported back to the Board with analysis and recommendations
that addressed community land use and zoning concerns about the West Gifford area. The Board
considered those recommendations and authorized initiation of the WGIC district rezoning process at
its September 14, 2010 meeting.
\w On October 21, 2010, staff notified affected property owners and interested parties and conducted a
public workshop to present the draft WGIC district regulations and obtain input, especially from
affected property owners. At the workshop, property owners strongly objected to eliminating any
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\2-18-14 BCC.doc 3
64
uses currently allowed, but also indicated that they could support regulations that require businesses
to run cleanly and that require reasonable aesthetic upgrades along 451h Street. After the 10/12/2010
workshop, the Gifford Executive Group met on several occasions to discuss proposed regulations
and various regulation alternatives, including meetings held in October 2010, February 2011, April
2011, and June 2011. The group's February 2011 meeting included a tour of Prestige's Eau Gallie
concrete batch plant with Prestige employees. The plant, over 20 years old, abuts a single-family
neighborhood, and had been recently upgraded by Prestige to resolve some issues with DEP. During
the tour, the group observed operations that generated significant noise, observed on-site
accumulations of dust that had been wetted -down to control air -borne emissions, and found evidence
of adverse impacts on adjacent homes from fugitive dust emissions.
During the summer and fall of 2011, staff coordinated with Marcie Nolan, an attorney and planner
from the Becker & Poliakoff firm that was retained by the Progressive Civic League of Gifford. Ms.
Nolan provided input regarding various West Gifford regulation draft proposals. On January 27,
2012, after notifying affected property owners and interested parties, staff conducted a second public
workshop. At that workshop, staff presented a revised draft of the WGIC district regulations and
proposed rezoning. The workshop meeting was not productive. In the words of Deputy County
Attorney Bill DeBraal, "...the meeting's decorum disintegrated as the business owners and
community leaders exchanged heated barbs". At that point in the meeting, the Deputy County
Attorney volunteered to meet separately with business/property owners and community
representatives to try to reach consensus. The workshop was adjourned with the expectation that
mediation meetings would be held.
From February 2012 through August 2013, the Deputy County Attorney held separate meetings with
business/property owners and community representatives. Those mediation efforts are covered
extensively in the attached memo from the Deputy County Attorney (see attachment #3). During the
mediation meetings, general consensus on a number of issues was reached and some potential was
found for addressing concrete batch plants, mulch operations, and demolition debris sites through
special regulations. From July 2013 to the present, staff obtained additional input through Gifford
Neighborhood Plan community meetings and drafted revised regulations based on the Deputy
County Attorney's memo.
ANALYSIS
* Zoning District and Overlay Regulation Approaches
The original WGIC initiative authorized by the Board in 2010 proposed to establish a new zoning
district, the WGIC district, and then rezone the 163 acres of IG zoned property in West Gifford to the
new WGIC zoning district. In 2010, staff recommended and the Board chose to pursue the WGIC
district approach over other approaches. Other approaches considered and rejected included
modifying IG district regulations (county -wide) to specifically regulate concrete batch plants and
other similar uses, and down -zoning the 163 acres of IG property to IL (Light Industrial). The WGIC
district approach was chosen primarily because it allowed creation of regulations that specifically
address the unique land use conflicts in West Gifford and provided a means of adding various uses
not currently allowed on IG zoned properties as a trade-off for eliminating certain uses and adding
special regulations for other uses.
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIQ\2014UPDATE\2-18-14 BCC.doe 4
65
As a result of mediation meetings held after the January 27, 2012 workshop, staff learned that
owners of affected properties in West Gifford preferred keeping the current IG zoning since most
allowed uses proposed for inclusion in the WGIC district were industrial uses and because the
owners wanted their properties to be known as general industrial properties. An alternative to the
WGIC district/rezoning approach is to create a set of special regulations that overlay the IG zoning
district in West Gifford. A similar approach is currently used for the county's aesthetic corridors that
overlay properties fronting certain major streets. In the case of the first such aesthetic corridor, the
Wabasso Corridor, special criteria and use regulations overlay variously zoned properties in the
Wabasso area with regulations that prohibit or restrict certain uses normally allowed by zoning.
Thus, the Wabasso, Corridor regulations contain special aesthetic requirements and use restrictions
that are over and above the county's general development and zoning district regulations. Staffs 19
years of experience with the Wabasso Corridor regulations has demonstrated that overlay regulations
are effective. In staff's opinion, it is appropriate for the county to change from the WGIC
district/rezoning approach to the WGIC special overlay regulations approach to accommodate the
desires of affected property owners while adequately addressing the industrial land use conflicts in
West Gifford.
• Concrete Batch Plants, Mulch Operations, and Demolition Debris Facilities
Concerns about allowing a concrete batch plant in West Gifford were confirmed during the February
2011 tour of Prestige's Eau Gallie batch plant, as described in the description and conditions section
of this report. As evidenced on that tour, concrete batch plants produce noise, run-off, and fugitive
dust impacts that need to be adequately addressed. Mulch operations are a concern in West Gifford
due to fire hazards and smoke that can result if and when piles of vegetative debris combust. Years
ago, when the existing mulch facility in West Gifford was under different ownership/control, a
number of fires occurred that threatened the area around the mulch facility and impacted the
community with smoke. With respect to demolition debris sites in West Gifford, Gifford residents
expressed the same concerns that were expressed during the public hearings for the A-1
Walee/Indian River County Recyclers demolition debris site proposals in the south county. Those
concerns included compatibility, especially due to environmental concerns such as run-off and air -
born emissions. For the reasons cited above, concrete batch plants, mulch operations, and
demolition debris facilities are uses that had a special focus in mediation discussions and in staff's
draft regulations.
West Gifford special regulations can treat development of concrete batch plants, mulch operations,
and demolition debris facilities in a number of ways, as follows:
1. Permitted Uses: allow the uses "by right" as currently allowed in the IG district and rely on
general development regulations and West Gifford buffer regulations to address
compatibility.
2. Administrative Permit Uses: allow the uses as conditional uses, subject to specific criteria
and Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) review, with a limited ability for the county to
impose approval conditions.
3. Special Exception Uses: allow the uses as special exception uses, subject to specific criteria,
subject to public notice and public hearings before the PZC and BCC, and subject to the
applicant demonstrating compatibility with surrounding land uses and no adverse impacts on
health, safety, and welfare, with the ability of the county to impose approval conditions to
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\2-18-14 BCC.doc 5
66
ensure compatibility and no adverse impacts.
4. Prohibited Uses: eliminate the uses within the WGIC overlay area.
In staff's opinion, treating the 3 uses as permitted uses does not adequately address the West Gifford
land use conflicts previously described and does not give sufficient guidance to potential applicants
as to how to address community concerns. Treating the 3 uses as administrative permit uses does
provide for specific criteria and PZC review but does not provide a public hearing process and does
not require the applicant to demonstrate compatibility and no adverse impacts. Treating the 3 uses as
special exception uses provides for specific criteria, requires applicants to demonstrate compatibility
and no adverse impacts, and requires notice and public hearings before the PZC and BCC. Given the
potential adverse impacts of the 3 uses in West Gifford, it is appropriate to require applications for
those uses to go through the public hearing process and for the Board to make the county's final
decision on applications for those uses.
The fourth option presented above is to prohibit the 3 uses in the 163 acres of West Gifford's IG
zoned properties. That option addresses community concerns but provides no opportunity under
county regulations for an affected property owner/applicant to develop an appropriately sized and
situated parcel, with a properly designed project that is shown to be compatible with no adverse
impacts. For that reason, staff does not support prohibiting the 3 uses in West Gifford.
• Proposed WGIC Overlay Regulations
In its draft form, the proposed WGIC overlay regulations would add, delete, and specially regulate a
number of uses compared to the uses allowed in the IG district (see attachment #4). Specifically, the
draft overlay regulations propose to eliminate from West Gifford 15 uses such as farm labor services,
adult entertainment, airports/airstrips, heliports/helipads, landfills, and certain types of
manufacturing such as tobacco, paper, petroleum, tires, steel, cement, and tanning/finishing hides.
None of the 15 uses proposed for elimination currently exist within the 163 acre WGIC overlay area.
Although mediation meetings revealed that affected owners did not favor elimination of any uses
currently allowed, there was a general consensus that eliminating the 15 uses as proposed could be
acceptable (see page 2 of attachment #2).
The draft overlay regulations also propose adding 39 types of business use categories not currently
allowed in the IG district that would be compatible with WGIC industrial uses. Business uses
proposed to be added include: auto repair and sales, carpet and dry cleaning, boat sales, equipment
rental, electric and jewelry repair, enclosed salvage facilities, indoor auction facilities, paint and
hardware stores, and computer and data processing facilities. Adding those uses to the WGIC
regulations was acceptable to community leaders and affected property owners, although most
owners indicated during mediation discussions that many of the proposed new uses would be more
economically feasible in high traffic areas such as US 1 as compared to a lower traffic area such as
West Gifford.
The draft overlay regulations treat concrete batch plants, mulch operations, and demolition debris
facilities as special exception uses subject to criteria specific to West Gifford. The criteria currently
proposed for those 3 uses provide special separation distances between dust -producing activities and
residential areas, as well as requirements and best management practices (bmps) for project
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\2-18-14 BCC.doc 6
67
improvements and operating conditions that address run-off, air emissions, noise impacts, and other
potential hazards previously described in this report. In addition, the draft overlay regulations will:
• Allow single-family subdivisions along the west edge of the overlay area where potential
subdivision sites abut existing residential property. For a new subdivision, the proposed
regulations require installation of a Type "A" buffer and administrative permit use approval
from the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC).
• Allow multi -family residential units, accessory to industrial and business facilities, similar to
existing allowances for accessory units in various commercial districts.
The allowances for accessory multi -family, and the allowance for single-family residential on the
western edge of the overlay area, were initiated by the Gifford Executive Group and were not
objected to by affected property owners.
Besides changes to allowed uses and special criteria for specific uses, the proposed overlay
regulations provide significant buffering requirements where new non-residential development abuts
residential zoning or residential uses and where new loading docks are proposed adjacent to
residential properties. The proposed buffering requirements are similar to IG district buffer
requirements with some adjustments for West Gifford conditions. In addition, the draft overlay
regulations require an upgrade in the appearance of existing junk yards that front 45h Street. Those
junk yards were developed in the 1960s and 1970s when the only "aesthetic" requirement applied to
junk yards was for an 8' tall perimeter wall or fence. As a result, most of the 45th Street junk yard
frontage consists of old 8' fencing with no landscaping.
Because 45th Street is Gifford's primary roadway corridor, and because the existing junk yards are
grandfathered -in and not required under existing regulations to upgrade their 45'x' Street appearance
unless significantly re -developed through the major site plan process, staff proposes a mandatory
appearance upgrade. As proposed, owners of junk yards fronting 451' Street will be required to
provide continuous vegetative screening (landscaping) in front of their fencing or build a wall with
aesthetic features by June 30, 2016. One junk yard owner, Keith Taig (Mr. Scrap), has already
replaced his fence with an aesthetic wall that would meet the proposed requirements and has been
commended at Gifford community meetings for doing so.
• Property Rights
Whenever a local government eliminates or restricts uses, impacts on property rights must be
considered. Property rights can be impacted by changes in allowed uses as well as regulations that
limit or place conditions on allowable uses.
In Florida, state statutes (the Bert Harris Act) provide that when a governmental entity "inordinately
burdens an existing use of real property... the property owner of that real property is entitled to
relief, which may include compensation for the actual loss to the fair market value of the real
property caused by the action of government... ". The statute defines an existing use as a reasonably
foreseeable, nonspeculative land use which is suitable for the subject real property.
When eliminating uses or changing permitted uses to conditional uses as proposed with the WGIC
FACommunity DevelopmenAGifford (WGIC)12014UPDATE\2-18-14 BCC.doc 7
68
overlay regulations, the Bert Harris Act could apply. Whether either of those actions would
"inordinately burden" a property is an issue that would be decided in court. There is, however, a
potentially significant financial risk for the county to proceed with a rezoning or other action that
results in a loss of use.
As drafted, the proposed WGIC overlay regulations address these property rights concerns. While
eliminating 15 uses allowed in the IG district, the WGIC overlay regulations will allow 39 uses not
currently permitted in the IG district. In addition, the proposed overlay regulations will specially
regulate, rather than prohibit, 3 uses of special concern: concrete batch plants, mulch operations, and
demolition debris facilities. The proposed overlay regulations reflect an effort to protect and expand
property rights while addressing community concerns.
In staff's opinion, the proposed WGIC overlay regulations address the Gifford community's land use
and zoning concerns in the West Gifford industrial area while protecting property rights and
increasing the overall number of allowable uses in the West Gifford IG -zoned area.
• Pending Ordinance Doctrine
A number of times in years past, the Board has "invoked the pending ordinance doctrine" when it has
considered a set of draft regulations and authorized staff to initiate the formal LDR amendment
process. By invoking the pending ordinance doctrine, the Board can have draft regulations applied to
new development applications until final regulations are formally adopted. By doing so, the county
can prevent submission of a rushed development application intended to elude new regulations being
considered. In staff's opinion, it is appropriate for the Board to consider invoking the pending
ordinance doctrine with respect to the draft WGIC overlay regulations to prevent a rush to apply for
project approval and to prevent an unnecessary rush to adopt final regulations.
• Process
If the Board authorizes staff to initiate the process to formally adopt WGIC overlay regulations, then
staff will schedule one public hearing before the PZC and two public hearings before the Board.
Two public hearings before the Board will be required since the proposed regulations will change the
list of uses allowed within the overlay area. Also, prior to each public hearing, staff will mail letters
to all current owners of property within the 163 acre IG -zoned area. In addition, staff will continue
to disseminate information via its West Gifford property owners and Gifford interested parties e-mail
lists.
CONCLUSION
The West Gifford (WGIC) initiative has been discussed and vetted over a period of years with a
variety of interested parties, including affected property owners and Gifford community
representatives and residents. In staff's opinion, mediation and consensus -building efforts have been
made and a compromise is needed to move the initiative forward. It is staff's position that the draft
overlay regulations represent a reasonable compromise, whereby West Gifford properties zoned IG
will retain their IG zoning but be subjected to special regulations. As proposed, those regulations
prohibit certain heavy industrial uses, add new commercial/industrial uses, and regulate concrete
FACommunity DevelopmenAGifford (WGIC)12014UPDATEI2-1$-14 BCC.doc 8
69
batch plants, mulch operations, and demolition debris facilities as special exception uses subject to
strict criteria. For those reasons, staff supports initiation of the formal process to adopt the draft
overlay regulations. Staff also supports invoking the pending ordinance doctrine to prevent a rush to
elude the proposed regulations and a rush to adopt the proposed regulations.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the BCC authorize staff to initiate the formal process of amending the LDRs
to create the WGIC overlay regulations. Furthermore, staff recommends that the BCC invoke the
pending ordinance doctrine and direct staff to apply the draft WGIC overlay regulations to
development applications until final regulations are formally adopted.
ATTACHMENTS
1. West Gifford Maps
2. Minutes from September 14, 2010 BCC Meeting
3. Memo from Deputy County Attorney Dated August 27, 2013
4. Chart Comparing IG District Uses and WGIC Overlay Uses
5. Updated Draft WGIC Overlay Regulations and Industrial BMPs
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM:
FOR: February 18, 2014
BY:
FACommunity DevelopmenAGifford (WGIC)12014UPDATEi2-18-14 BCC.doc
Indian River Co,
Approved Date
Admin.ND:z
Legal
13
(,j 1
Budget
_ ';Z -
Dept.
2 cr l�f
Risk Mgr.
01
70
.4
•
x
1
'� IZ•A.2. REQUEST FROM STAFF AND THE GIFFORDExECUTIIB GROUP FOR
A UTHORIZATION TO INITIATE AN LDR AMENDMENT TO CREATE THE
WEST GIFFORD INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCE DISTRICT (WGIC) AND TO
INITIATE THE REZONING OF 163 ACRES FROMIG TO WGIC
Planning Director Stan Boling used a PowerPoint Presentation (on file) to present
background and analysis on the request of staff and the Gifford Executive Group to create the
West Gifford Industrial & Commerce District (WGIC), and to initiate the rezoning of 163 acres
from IG (General Industrial) to WGIC. He recalled that in September 2009, the Progressive
Civic League had requested to rezone the West Gifford area to Light Industrial (IL), and that
after presenting this item to the Board in November 2009, staff had been directed to obtain input
from the Gifford Community. Director Boling advised that meetings between staff, community
members, and the newly created Gifford Executive Group had led to the development of the
proposed initiative. He reviewed the uses which would be permitted in the proposed district, and
outlined the requirements for the two grandfathered uses — mulch products and junk/salvage
yards. Director Boling thereafter requested that the Board authorize staff to begin the formai
process of initiating an LDR change to create the new WGIC commerce district regulations and
to initiate rezoning of the 163 acres.
Commissioner Flescher congratulated staff, the Gifford Executive Group, and other
participating community members who worked on the WGIC District initiative. He affirmed
that the new district would align with the County's standard of embracing clean, light industry
that would provide employment opportunities.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Flescher,
SECONDED by Commissioner Wheeler, to authorize staff
to: (1) initiate the formal process of amending the LDR's
to create the WGIC district; and (2) initiate the process to
rezone 163 acres in the West Gifford area from IG
(General Industrial) to WGIC (West Gifford Industrial &
13
September 14, 2010
73
Commerce District), as recommended in the memorandum
of September 2, 2010.
Vice Chairman Solari and Commissioner Wheeler applauded staff and the community for
their efforts towards the development of the WGIC District.
Chairman O'Bryan and Vice Chairman Solari were concerned about the costs for the
junk/salvage yards to add landscaping screening by 2013, as would be required under the new
regulations, and Vice Chairman Solari requested that staff provide cost estimates.
Staff provided further information for Chairman O'Bryan regarding the "no expansion"
policy for mulch product businesses (one of the grandfathered uses).
A brief discussion ensued on whether the proposed redistricting/rezoning might result in
potential Bert J. Harris Private Property Rights Protection Act (Bert Harris) issues. Vice
Chairman Solari wanted to emphasize at the upcoming public hearing, that creation of the WGIC
District and the rezoning would increase property values throughout the area.
County Attorney Alan Polackwich, Sr. affirmed that staff was monitoring potential Bert
Harris issues closely, and would provide an opinion to the Board at the end of the redistricting
and rezoning process.
Tony Brown, Gifford Executive Group member, thanked the Commissioners, talked
about the cooperative nature of staff, and remarked that the WGIC District could help enhance
and beautify the Gifford community.
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and the
Motion carried unanimously. The Board authorized staff
to: (1) initiate the formal process of amending the LDR's
to create the WGIC district; and (2) initiate the process to
September 14, 2010
14
TTAE0 2
74
rezone 163 acres in the West Gifford area from IG
(General Industrial) to WGIC (West Gifford Industrial &
Commerce District), as recommended in the memorandum
of September 2, 2010.
12.E. HUMAN
12.F.
12.H. RECREATION -NONE
12.L PUBLIC WORKS
I
Public Works Director Christopher Mora used a PowerPo t Presentation (on file) to
provide details on a right-of-way acquisition located at the southwes corner of 69th Street and
66th Avenue. He explained that the property had gone into foreclosur with U.S. Bank National
Association as Trustee, subsequent to the Board's approval on June 3, 200, of a Purchase &
September 14, 2010
15
75
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney
Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney
Office of
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Stan Boling, Planning Director
FROM: William K.D Braal Deputy CountAttorne
y
DATE: August 27, 2013
SUBJECT: West Gifford Industrial Commercial Zoning District
ATTORNEY
In 2007, Community Development Department approved a site plan application for a
concrete ready mix plant to be located at 5045 45th Street, in the West Gifford area.
Staff level approval was proper as the area is zoned IG, General Industrial and ready
mix concrete plants are a permitted use under that zoning classification. Surrounding
property owners and Gifford community leaders expressed great concern that the
concrete plant, and many other traditional "heavy" industrial uses, could be approved at
the staff level given the surrounding area is residentially zoned. The Board of County
Commissioners directed staff to study the possibility of changing the zoning
classification in the West Gifford area. The West Gifford area under discussion is
located between 43rd and 58th Avenues from 41$t Street north to 49th Street. As a result
of the Board's direction, staff drafted regulations for a new district that would prohibit
certain heavy industrial uses and add certain commercial uses not allowed in the IG
district.
Staff then held a series of workshops with business owners and Gifford community
leaders and citizens concerning the proposed zoning changes for the West Gifford area:
The last workshop was held on the afternoon of Friday, January 27, 2012 and was
attended by Gifford Community leaders, residents and business owners. Unfortunately,
the meeting's decorum disintegrated as the business owners and community leaders
exchanged heated barbs. At that time, I volunteered to meet with each side separately
in an attempt to reach some sort of consensus to move the matter further along.
Over the last 18 months, I have met with representatives from the West Gifford area
concerning the proposed zoning changes for the area. Meetings were held with
business owners in West Gifford to try and form a consensus of some of the zoning
changes that all business owners could support. Meetings were also held with West
Gifford community leaders and neighborhood residents to try to fashion a zoning district
76
West Gifford Zoning
August 27, 2013
Page 12
that would be more complimentary to the residential neighborhood dotted throughout
the West Gifford area. Staff also met with representatives from Prestige Concrete/St.
Mary's Cement to try to work out a series of site specific protections that would allow for
the approval and construction of a concrete ready mix plant in the West Gifford area.
The purpose of this memorandum is to update you as to the current status of the zoning
district, advise you of the steps that are needed to go forward with the zoning district,
and to advise you as to the potential risks of rezoning.
In early 2012, 1 met with the business owners to discuss the proposed zoning changes.
While the business owners were sympathetic to the concerns of the West Gifford
residents, they were quick to point out the following factors:
• Their businesses are properly located in an industrially zoned district.
• They had expended time, money and sweat into building successful
businesses
• Their businesses provide a direct benefit to the community through taxes,
wages and employment.
• All of the West Gifford businesses were local in nature and smaller in size
which is the type of business hardest hit by additional government
regulation
It was the consensus of the business owners that the proposed zoning changes were
unsolicited and thrust upon them. All expressed concern that proposed changes may
affect their livelihood in a slow moving economy. During the three meetings spanning
the 18 months, the business owners reluctantly agreed to the elimination of some of the
more heavy industrial uses proposed by staff. While there was not unanimous
agreement for some of the eliminated uses, the consensus of the group was that certain
uses could be eliminated from the district. They include:
• adult entertainment
• textile mills (assembly of textiles would be acceptable)
• paper and petroleum manufacturing
• tire manufacturing
• tanning of hides
• sanitary services such as sewer plants or landfills
• non metallic plants such as gypsum manufacturing
• metal manufacturing and airports.
Two other uses: farm labor services and tobacco product manufacturing would remain,
however no detailed definitions could be found for those uses.
ATTACHMENT 3 77
West Gifford Zoning
August 27, 2013
Page 13
The business owners were hesitant to eliminate cement/concrete plants, demolition
debris, and mulch products and services from the zoning district. As will be discussed
later, one of the West Gifford business owners had already received County approval to
construct a concrete ready mix plant within the West Gifford area. Due to the down turn
in the economy, that plant has not been constructed and the site plan approval has
expired. Other business owners were reluctant to eliminate mulch products and
services as there is an existing operation of that kind in the area. Demolition debris was
the final use that the business owners did not wish to see eliminated from the West
Gifford area. They contended that recycling demolition debris was a fairly new
technology, and with further development, it may be an acceptable use within the area.
Proposed new uses. Most of the business owners were not enthusiastic about the
proposed new commercial uses that would attach to their property. Most of the
attendees had already established business that would not be compatible with new
commercial uses added. They also pointed to the fact that most of the traffic driving
past their business was local in nature and in volumes far less than would be seen on
State Road 60 or U.S. 1, the more traditional commercial thoroughfares. It was the
consensus of the group that the additional uses would be accepted but would not make
much of an immediate benefit to their property; nor would the changes be a factor that
would greatly increase the value of their property.
Prestige Concrete. In 2007 Prestige Concrete purchased a nine acre parcel of property
located at 5045 45th Street in Vero Beach. They applied for and received site plan
approval for construction of ready mix concrete plant at this site. The issuance of site
plan approval for the proposed facility was proper, as ready mix concrete is a permitted
use in the current IG zoning district. Prestige did not go forward with construction of the
plant due to market conditions, and in part due to a site plan requirement necessitating
the construction of a turn lane on the south side of 45th Street. Construction of the turn
lane would require installing a culvert in the canal on 45th Street, which Prestige
estimated to cost upwards of $400,000.00. Prestige has worked closely with staff in the
design of their facility. Although not required by code, Prestige has proposed additional
coverings for areas where product would be exposed, additional wash stations to
reduce dust and centralizing the location of the equipment so as to further reduce noise
impact to the surrounding neighborhoods. Prestige was also open to the idea of having
all traffic enter and exit onto 415t Street, thus avoiding residential neighborhoods along
45th Street and the expense of a 45th Street turn lane. Additional easements from their
neighboring property owners to the south would be required before this could be
achieved.
At this time, Prestige has not submitted a new site plan application but instead is
awaiting the outcome of the proposed zoning changes. Should the use of the ready mix
plant be eliminated from the list of allowable zoning uses in the West Gifford area,
Prestige may exercise its right to file a Bert Harris Act Claim against the County citing
ATTACHMEVT
West Gifford Zoning
August 27, 2013
Wage 14
the decrease in property value due to the new zoning restrictions applied to their site.
There would be a one year time period: from implementation of the new code standards
in which Prestige may file its claim. At that time the County could choose to either
negotiate a settlement with Prestige or proceed to refute the claim through the use of
expert testimony and deteriorating market conditions.
The proposed zoning changes also carry updated landscaping requirements. If
approved, current business owners would have 18 months in which to submit a new
landscape plan for approval by the County. The business owners would then have an
additional period of two to three years in which to implement the plan. The existence of
Murphy Act Reservations and limited parking provide challenges to providing the
landscaping. Additionally, from a legal perspective, the County has never required
existing property owners to upgrade landscaping without an accompanying change of
use, change of ownership or substantial expansion or alteration of the existing building.
The majority of the business owners expressed concern that their industrial usage was
not compatible with landscaping and that requiring the installation and maintenance of
additional trees and shrubs would be one more burden placed on small businesses.
Perspective of the West Gifford Residents and Homeowners. The West Gifford
community leaders and homeowners are represented by Marcie Nolan of the firm of
Becker & Poliakoff. Later in the proceedings, John R. Maher, a retired judge from New
Hampshire also offered his assistance in coordination with Ms. Nolan. After the
approval of the Prestige ready mix plant in 2007, the leaders and homeowners in the
West Gifford community expressed great concern at the lack of public participation
available to them with the siting of a concrete ready mix plant. Specifically, that there
was no notice required under our code for a variety of allowable uses such as tanning
plants, paper manufacturing or metal manufacturing. The homeowners in West Gifford
would support elimination of the following general industrial uses in the West Gifford
area:
• Farm labor services
• adult entertainment
• tobacco product manufacturing
• textile mills
• paper, petroleum and tire manufacturing (raw materials)
• tanning finishing
• cement/concrete plants
• mineral plants such as gypsum or lime
• metal manufacturing
• demolition debris
• mulch products and services
• airports, air services, heliports, and helipads
ATTACHMENT 3-
79
West Gifford Zoning
August 27, 2013
Page (5
® sanitary services such as landfills.
it should be pointed out that there is an existing mulching business within the West
Gifford area. If the mulching product and services use would be eliminated as a
permitted use, then the current mulching operation would be able to continue as a legal
non -conforming use. The mulch business would be able to remain in place but could
not be increased in size. If the use were to cease for one calendar year, the property
would not be able to be used as a mulch facility.
The leaders and homeowners also look at the increased commercial uses as being a
benefit to their neighborhoods by supplying needed services not provided by industrially
zoned property. There is currently $200,000.00 for landscaping and streetscape
improvements along 45th Street from 43`d Avenue to US 1 in the County budget for FY
2013-14. The leaders and homeowners feel that the combination of landscaping
upgrades by the County and the business owners will provide needed improvements for
the appearance of the community.
Overall, the leaders and homeowners are satisfied that the heaviest industrial uses
were being eliminated. They were also receptive to the disappearance of the
administrative use permit where the industrial uses would be approved without notice to
surrounding neighborhoods. During the discussion of the new zoning district, the idea
of a zoning overlay was suggested. Under this scenario, the new commercial uses
would be laid over and be in addition to the existing industrial uses in the area. The
overlay would provide the expanded commercial uses without complete elimination of
the industrial zoning category. The homeowners preferred the elimination of the
industrial use categories rather than an overlay approach to new zoning categories.
In conclusion, it is the consensus of both sides to eliminate the following traditionally
heavy industrial uses:
adult entertainment
textile mills (assembly of textiles would be acceptable)
paper and petroleum manufacturing
tire manufacturing
• tanning of hides
sanitary services such as sewer plants or landfills
non metallic plants such as gypsum manufacturing
metal manufacturing and airports
ATTACHMENT
West Gifford Zoning
August 27, 2013
Page 16
There was consensus that the following uses could be added to the West Gifford area:
Carpet cleaning Indoor Boat/Auto/RV service
Dry cleaning Single/Multi family residential housing
Car Washes Restaurants (with drive through ok)
Auto and home supply store Hardware/building/paint stores
Boat/RV/Auto Sales Gas station/convenience store
A more complete list of uses is attached to this memo.
There was no consensus reached on the following uses:
• mulch products and services
• demolition debris
• cement/concrete plants
The leaders and homeowners discussed the idea of a conditional use permit for these
three uses as notice and public hearing would be afforded to them.
As you know, the Board has directed staff to update the Gifford Neighborhood Plan and
Community Development- staff is currently in the process of conducting meetings with
the various interested parties. It may be beneficial for the WGIC parties to participate in
the on going process of updating the Gifford Neighborhood Plan and obtain community
feedback through that process prior to bringing WGIC back before the Board of County
Commissioners.
Thank you for allowing me to work on this most interesting project. Please contact me
with any questions.
ATTACHMENT 3
81
5
fiYTACIIMEl1T 4
82
cd
td
C6
C6
U)
tc
v
v
O
Cd
O
�
Cd
C)
O
:
cn
U
c;
cd
v
'''
'bO
°
En
cts
p
V)
U°
O
•d
c
C's
'�
cd
co
O
,
+UJU
v�
��
v
�
qOj
•—��,
cd
U
O
•�
p
v\
V
'b
O
CL C
vCT
v
O
�
sx.
p
�n
�
b
O
. En
U
cd
p
�Cc
0
cd
wwzu�:
alax4�D
Q70Uac�!
N
M
-i
N�6
In.cd
06
C�
O
--+
N
M
4kf�
"Clrn;=
00
01
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
fiYTACIIMEl1T 4
82
cd
td
C6
C6
v
v
�
�
Cd
C)
O
:
cn
p
V)
co
�
•�
p
O
U
v
O
�
sx.
p
�n
�
b
O
. En
U
cd
p
�Cc
In.cd
t
"Clrn;=
b
bc
CL
v
--�.
cd
v
v�
°
cd
v
o
-0
'M
�
a
a
�
"Z5
c;lsl
acd
ua
u��a�a��
¢c4QuU,C'n
con
U,
ON
M
�n
�
06
C1
O
fiYTACIIMEl1T 4
82
M
-.4 N c'r`y
U
a�
U
c�
C�
c
rA
03
'
cd
p
U
4C."
ec3
4CC3,
03
C,l
Ua
• r+
cci
o
�
C)
cd
auz
Cd
cn
O
N
M
4
�
,—+
k
a�
U
C�
rA
44
ec3
4CC3,
03
C,l
Ua
• r+
cci
o
�
C)
cd
k
wdHHa0-4
06
R
cv
83
1 2/10/14 Version I
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
ESTABLISH NEW OVERLAY CODE SECTION
Section 911.23 West Gifford Industrial and Commerce (WGIC) Overlay Regulations
(1) Purpose. The West Gifford Industrial and Commerce (WGIC) overlay regulations are
intended to establish special regulations for properties in West Gifford zoned IG, General
Industrial to accommodate industry and commerce in West Gifford in a manner compatible with
community residents and businesses.
(2) Boundaries of the WGIC overlay regulations area. The West Gifford Industrial and
Commerce (WGIC) overlay regulations area is generally located between 43'd Avenue and 58th
2
Avenue, north of 41St Street, south of 47th Street, and overlays all properties within the
referenced area that are zoned IG (General Industrial).
(3) Relation to IG District regulations. The WGIC overlay regulations supplement the IG
11
district regulations and supersede the IG district regulations ejoations with respect to the,uses allowed
within the overlay area as shown in the use table below,.,
(4) Definitions. The following terms are defined for the. purposes of interpreting and
implementing the WGIC overlay regulations:,.
(a) Junk and salvage yards unenclosed f4ci,htie
a use of land meeting the Chapter
901 definition of "Junkyard" conduct6d pfiffi4tilyvoutside an enclosed building.
(b) Salvage facility nclosed building): a use of land meeting the Chapter 901
,,
definftloA,, of "Junkyard" conducted within an enclosed building area with the
exception of a lo��`
ading area screened in accordance with WGIC overlay
regulations.
(5) Wes. Uses i . n,:Ihe, West Gifford Industrial and Commerce overlay area are classified as
permitted uses (P), administrative " permit uses (A), and special exception uses (S). Site plan
review and approval shall' be required' for the construction, expansion, and change in use of
structure's and buildings with,- the overlay area.
Use
WGIC Overlay
Agriculture
Nurseries and garden supplies, horticultural and landscape
P --
Kennels and animal boarding
P
MULCH PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Is
Services
Landscape services :::=p
Veterinary services
I P
Note: BOLD TYPE ALL CAPS: uses changed from permitted to special exception compared
to the IG district
Bold type: uses added (new) compared to the IG district
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WG1C)\2014UPDATE\WG1C0yer1a* 'Ctdoc
---
ATTACtit 5 84
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
Commercial Construction
General building contractor/construction yard
P
Special trade contractor
p
Personal Services
Linen supply p
Carpet and upholstery cleaning p*
Dry cleaning plants p*
Auto Repair, Services and Parkin
Automobile parking and storage(paved surface)P
Body and aint shops p*
General automotive repair p*
Carwash p
Miscellaneous Repairs
Electrical and electronic repair
Reupholstery and furniture
Weldingp "
Heavy machinery and equipment maintenance, re air, an we"I's P
Social Services
Job training services p
Wholesale Trade
Durable goods not including demolition debris site,'ufi� ; ,ard, rec clu g center P
Non -durable goods p
Auto and home supply store , p
Gasoline service station"' " p
Automotive parts (used). p*
Boat dealer p
Recreational vehicle dealer`:; .. p
Motorcycle de'aer �� �;;, .' : P
Automotive Dealers an"'d,Services
Automobile sates and ren#as new d/or used)P
AutoM6tl*'e;;fluid sales and services other thangasoline)
P*
Eating and , Diinking Establ6k ents
Restaurant "` ` P
Take out restaurant p
Drive through restaurant '` P
Fuel dealer p*
Marine -Related Commercial Activities
Boat sales and rental
P
Marine repair and services
P
Industrial
Food and kindred products P*
Note: BOLD TYPE ALL CAPS: uses changed from permitted to special exception compared
to the IG district
Bold type: uses added (new) compared to the IG district
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIQ\2014UPDATE\WGI OveI Dis NT � 2
'�'�� f 85
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
Fruit and vegetable juice extraction
p*
Fruit and vegetable packing house
P*
Cloth and clothing products(excluding textile mills
P*
Lumber and wood(excluding lumber/saw mills
p
Furniture and fixtures
p
Printing and related support activities
P
Chemicals
p*
Rubber and plastics(excluding tire manufacturing)
P*
Rubber and plastic footwear
P
Hose, belts, gaskets and packing
P*
Fabricated rubber products
p*
Drugs and pharmaceuticals
P*
Footwear
p*
Other leather goods
�*
Brick and tile?
,
CONCRETE BATCH PLANTS
Sr"
Concrete cast products(excluding block and brick
p
Cut stone and marble products
p
Glass and glass products
p
Fabricated metal products ;
P*
Machine shop
p*
Industrial machinery and equipment
P
Electronic and other electric,.e_ u _ meat
P
Transportation a ui mept
P
Instruments and relate4 ',roducts
P
Junk and salva aaids' ui><enclosed'`,acilities
S
Salvage facility encloseduild><''"`''
P*
DEMOLITION. DEBRIS SIZE ,.,
S
Trans ortation and Utilities
Railroad,:and bus trans ``
ortation services.
P
Truckin "and courier serv><ces;
P
Commer6dt,Warehousing &'storage
P
Moving and 'story e
p
Trucking terminal'
p
Self storage
p
Outdoor storage
P
Vehicle storage lot unpaved, buffered per 926 and 954
P
Postal services
p
Pipelines
I P
Transportation Services
Freight transport arrangement (scheduling, shipping)
P
Note: BOLD TYPE ALL CAPS: uses changed from permitted to special exception compared
to the IG district
Bold type: uses added (new) compared to the IG district
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIQ\2014UPDAT *"fi> T0C 5
86
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
Communications
Communications towers wireless facilities
A**
Communications towers non -wireless facilities
Amateur radio(accessory use
p
Less than 80 feet
p
80 feet or taller see 971.44(4) forspecial criteria
S
Commercial
Up to 70 feet:
Camouflaged
p
Non -camouflaged
p
70 feet to 150 feet:
Camouflaged
A
Monopole minimum of 2 users)A
Not camouflaged and not monopole
)VS**
Over 150 feet:
All tower types see 971.44(l) forspecial criteria
Utilities
Public and private utilities, heavy
S
Gas services
p
Electric services
p
Water services
p
Irrigation systems
p
Residential Uses
Accessory housing watchmen ,
p
Single-family subdivision
A
Multi -family dwellinW,
A
Business Services
Credit reporting and collecho
P
t_
Mailing, re rocluctipn .and st�`ii - ra hic services
P
E ul< Ment rental an" ing
p
Em to rent agency
p
Help- S4& Y . services
p
Cam uter and data processing
P
Miscellaneousl,air
Electrical repair `
p
Watch, clock, 'ewelr
P
Research, testing, techolo services
P
Retail Trade
Building materials and garden supplies retail and wholesale
P
Paint lass and wallpaper stores
P*
Hardware store
p
Auction facilities, enclosed
P
Note: BOLD TYPE ALL CAPS: uses changed from permitted to special exception compared
to the IG district
Bold type: uses added (new) compared to the IG district
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\WGICOv *ME*T 5 4
87
L2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
New and used cars dealer p
Used vehicle sales p
Auto and home supply stores p
Convenience store p
XT_a_ - T
�..,«. 1,v " 1 1 r t1L.0 CAra: uses cnangea rrom permitted to special exception compared
to the IG district
Bold type: uses added (new) compared to the IG district
P= Permitted use
A= Administrative permit use
S= Special exception use
*The use shall be conducted within an enclosed building.
**See 971.44 for wireless regulations and to detene whether the admilo*tive permit or
special exception use process applies. s
(6) Upgrade of 45h Street Appearance. On or be 0, -2015, the owner of any pre-
existing junk and salvage yard (unenclosed facility) that 45th Street shall obtain approval
.or his designee o .''`� dscaping and irrigation plan
from the community development dire4
Y
for a continuous vegetative screening be th Street and this ua yard area. A wall with
aesthetic features may substitute for con4 nub �M�'' tative sere g. The landscaping and
irrigation plan shall include the following: YrY r'
A. Landscapin ents showi� n the ap - oved landscaping plan shall be
installed,gff
�ected, deemed actable by county staff on or before June 30,
2016. ; r f.
B. Location and I getat ' ° ` screening consisting of one or more of the
' lant rms, vi bs, understory trees and canopy trees. Where
sed, v . 11 be ' ed no further apart than 42" on center and shrubs shall be
&% planted no er a t n 36" on center. Landscaping and irrigation
Improvements be de ed in a manner that does not increase the degree of non-
formity with ypect parking area for any junk and salvage yard (unenclosed
C. Whe wall 'th aesthetic features is substituted for continuous vegetative
screening ,� • all shall be constructed, inspected, and deemed acceptable by county
staff on or ore June 30, 2016.
(7) Buffer yard requirements. For new development, where a nonresidential use within the
WGIC overlay area directly abuts a single-family or multifamily residential zoning district or
use, a landscaped buffer yard meeting the following specifications shall be required along the
side and/or rear property line of the development site.
Single
-Family Zoning
Multi -Family Zoning
Type
A 6 ft. Oa ue
Type A 6 ft. Oa ue
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC}\2014UP*T"N" 1`ict.do15
88
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
The buffer yard shall be measured at a right angle to the lot line. All buffering and
screening requirements shall meet the standards established in Chapter 926, Landscaping and
Buffering. No off-street parking or loading area shall be permitted within the required minimum
buffer yard.
A. A loading dock located adjacent to a residentially designated site and not screened
from view of the adjacent residential site by an intervening building or similar
structure shall be screened by an eight foot high wall located between the loading
dock and the residential site. Wall height shall be measured from the grade elevation
of the parking area adjacent to the loading dock. Plantings along the wall are required
in accordance with the standards of landscape ordinairice section 926.08.
B. A loading area associated with a salvage facility,, (enclosed building) shall be screened
from view from adjacent properties and xoadways by an eight foot opaque feature
consisting of a wall or wall and berm c9 ion.
C. Roadway buffers shall be provided as spedi ed"inlandscape ordinance section
926.09, "Landscaping along roadways".
D. Where a non-residential use abuts a, property with a residential land use designation,
the required buffer opaque feature shall ;consist of a wail with required understory
trees and shrubs installed on the side of the wall facing the residential property.
E. Where a wall .is`used,, in a buffer area or along,:a project perimeter, there shall be
variation in the desig�i';of the wall, as provided below.
Variation shall be provided ;b'`use of one (1) or more of the following
design crzteria bfr other similar design measures approved in writing by the
community; developmeritdirector or his designee:
a. Using two (2) color paint schemes.
b. Staggering the location of the wall. Straight wall length should not
exceed 'one hundred (100) feet. The minimum dimension of a wall
offset shall be three (3) feet.
C. Accenting the wall with articulated decorative features.
d. Breaking up the appearance of long sections of wall by the
placement of landscaped berms in front of the wall. Unbermed
wall sections shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet in length.
(8) Mulch products and services special regulations
(a) The special exception process and regulations for specific land uses
ordinance section 971.05 shall apply to mulch products and services
development projects.
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\ MK*T 5
Ce,
89
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
(b) Development application special information requirements:
1. A list of on-site activities and materials stored, handled, processed,
and produced on site (including by-products), together with a list
of any MSGP (Multi -Sector General Permit) special industry
sector pollution discharge requirements applicable to the proposed
project.
2. A national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES)
pollution prevention plan. Such pollution prevention plan shall
incorporate applicable items from; the county's list of industrial
best management practices (BMWs} mtothe pollution preventions
plan. [Said list is maintained by and available from the county
planning department]. In oc1�dWon the pollution; prevention plans
shall adequately addres.J e following:
a. Containment ofib off from stockpiles.
b. Containment of leaks, and °` spills from vehicles and
equipment used m tra}sporting, handling, or processing
materials.
r
C. Use of uirind erosion control measures in stockpile,
mulclices
mgprosing, and driveway areas.
3. A site plan labeling and' dep>ct1 the distance from any area where
materials are stockpiled, loadeunloaded, or processed outside an
enclosed building to,,any property containing a residential dwelling
(including a mobile home) within three -hundred (300) feet of such
ares:.
4. A ,comprehensive dust and spillage control plan that, at a
minimum, addresses the following:
a. Treatment of stockpiles, on-site processing areas, and
loading/unloading areas;
b. Control of dust from truck, equipment, and mulching
operations on site;
C. Methods of treatment, such as spraying/watering systems or
other dust suppressants, devices and techniques, that
prevent or minimize air -borne emissions from on-site and
off-site activities;
d. Use of mechanical dust and particulate recovery devices
and techniques;
e. Methods of preventing, minimizing, and cleaning up
material spillage on site and along adjacent roadways;
f. Applicable items from the county's list of industrial
operation BMPs.
N 0*7 5
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\WG>glA�i ttnet.doc
7
90
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
5. Noise modeling data and analysis demonstrating compliance with
Chapter 974 noise and nuisance requirements, including special
conditions necessary to ensure compliance with Chapter 974
requirements. Such conditions may include special setbacks,
buffers, noise -mitigating structures, equipment specifications, and
hours of operation limitations on certain activities.
6. If required by the fire department, the applicant shall submit for
and obtain fire department approval of a fire protection plan that
provides for adequate stockpile management and access, and fire
suppression improvements.
(c) Criteria for mulch products and services:
1. The noise ordinance requirements of Chapter 974 shall be: satisfied.
Based on the approved+nptse modeling data and analysis submitted
in accordance with the ab"'. .,r ire' ents, the county may attach
special noise mitigation conditions to project approval. Such
conditions - may include but are not limited to limitations on hours
of operationuse<;;of sound barriers, and use of muffling devices or
techniques to -ensure' pippliance with "Chapter 974 requirements.
....
2
3.
4.
5.
Dust, particulates, and matal spillage shall be controlled in
accprdance with the project's approved comprehensive dust and
spillage control plan submitted in accordance with the above
a
requirements. The county may attach special conditions to project
approval. Such conditions may include but are not limited to
sprinkler `systems, monitoring systems, structural enclosures, or
operationalprograms to ensure compliance with the approved dust
and-," illage control plan.
,Material,,stockpiles of non-combustible material shall not exceed a
height of twenty-five (25) feet above the grade of the adjacent
project site perimeter. The height of combustible material
stockpiles shall be regulated by the project's fire protection plan as
approved by the fire department.
No area where raw , materials are stockpiled, loaded/unloaded,
mulched, or processed outside an enclosed building shall be
located closer than three hundred (300) feet to any residential
dwelling (including a mobile home) or residentially zoned
property.
A Type "A" buffer with 6' opaque feature shall be provided
between any residentially zoned property or residential dwelling
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPD"M I t.doc 5 g
91
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
unit (including a mobile home) and any area where materials are
stockpiled, loaded/unloaded, mulched, or processed outside an
enclosed building.
(9) Demolition debris sites
(a) The WGIC overlay special regulations for mulch products and services
shall apply to demolition debris site development projects.
(b) The special exception process and criteria of regulations for specific land
uses ordinance section 971.05 shall apply and "the specific land use criteria
of section 971.27(1) for demolition debris:site& shall apply to demolition
debris site development projects.
(10) Concrete hatch plants
(a) The special exception process "and regulations for spec>fic,,Iand uses
ordinance section 971.05 shah =apply to concrete batch plant" development
projects.
(b) Development appi ion special information requirements:
A list of on-site
and produced o
of any MSGi
sector pollution
n
>nco�
best;;
plan.
plam
shall
WtiXaties and materials stored, handled, processed,
site (ifttudjrtby-products), together with a list
Multi Se'& General Permit) special industry
scharge requirements applicable to the proposed
pollutant, -..'discharge elimination system (NPDES)
vemtion plan. Such pollution prevention plan shall
Ipplicable items from the county's list of industrial
nent practices (BMPs) into the pollution preventions
list is maintained by and available from the county
artment]. In addition, the pollution prevention plans
ely address the following:
Containment of run-off from stockpiles.
Containment of leaks and spills from vehicles and
equipment used in transporting, handling, or processing
materials.
Use of wind erosion control measures in stockpile,
processing areas, and driveway areas.
3. A site plan labeling and depicting the distance from any area where
materials are stockpiled, loaded/unloaded, or processed outside an
enclosed building to any property containing a residential dwelling
(including a mobile home) within three -hundred (300) feet of such
area.
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\WGIC"rI,aUiK*T 5
6
92
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
4. A comprehensive dust and spillage control plan that, at a
minimum, addresses the following:
a. Treatment of stockpiles, on-site processing areas, and
loading/unloading areas;
b. Control of dust from truck, equipment, and operations on
site;
C. Methods of treatment, such as spraying/watering systems or
other dust suppressants, devices and techniques, that
prevent or minimize air -borne; emissions from on-site and
off-site activities;
d. Use of mechanical dust and partroulate recovery devices
and techniques;
e. Methods of preventing, minimizing, .and cleaning up
material spillage on site and along adjacent roadways;
f. Applicable it& -'O :from file county's list r'ti industrial
r..
operation BMPs. -
5. Noise modeling data and analysis .demonstrating compliance with
Chapter 974 nos,,,e and nuisance requirements, including special
conditions necessary, to., ensure compliance with Chapter 974
requirements. Such conditions may include but are not limited to
special setbacks; buffers, not "itigating structures, equipment
Specifications, and hours of operation limitations on certain
aot ies.
(c) Criteria for concrete batch plants:
1. T�,he noise ordinance requirements of Chapter 974 shall be satisfied.
Basedon the approved noise modeling data and analysis submitted
in accordance with the above requirements, the county may attach
special noise mitigation conditions to project approval. Such
conditions may include but are not limited to limitations on hours
o` f operation, use of sound barriers, and use of muffling devices or
techniques to ensure compliance with Chapter 974 requirements.
The following noise mitigation criteria shall be satisfied:
a. Sound -deadening walls or panels shall be placed at truck
loading/unloading areas and at bin gates.
b. An enclosed blower building shall be constructed and used
for the pumping of fly ash.
C. Trucks using the site that are equipped with back-up alarms
shall use alarms that direct sound toward the back of the
truck.
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDAT"W"11c 5 10 vv 93
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
2. Dust, particulates, and material spillage shall be controlled in
accordance with the project's approved comprehensive dust and
spillage control plan submitted in accordance with the above
requirements. The county may attach special conditions to project
approval. Such conditions may include but are not limited to
sprinkler systems, structural enclosures, monitoring systems,
and/or operational conditions to ensure compliance with the
approved dust and spillage control plan. The following dust
control and air emissions criteria shall be satisfied:
a. Covers shall be provided over. aggregate conveyors and
mixing areas.
b. Siding, walls, or cladding shall be provided around
aggregate discharge gaies and scales
C. Sprinklers shall be provided and used to wet all site areas
and driveways used by trucks.
d. Wheel wash facilities shalthe provided to prevent tracking
of material off-site`
e. As a condition of project approval, the county may require
an applicant to submit air emissions monitoring reports and
take corrective action to enure compliance with applicable
state and federal„air emissions requirements.
3. Material stockpiles shall not exceed a height of fifteen (15) feet
a rove the grade- of the adjacent project site perimeter. The
folowing criteria for the outdoor storage of aggregate and similar
materials shall be satisfied:
a. Stockpiles shall be contained in three -walled storage bins
oriented to` reduce the potential for airborne emissions from
prevailing winds.
b. Storage bins shall be partially roofed to reduce the potential
of `air -borne emissions.
;c. The height of bin walls, including vertical screening
structures placed on top of bin walls, shall exceed the
height of materials stockpiled within the bins by at least six
(6) feet where bins are open to the sky.
4. No area where materials are stockpiled, loaded/unloaded, mixed,
or processed outside an enclosed building shall be located closer
than three hundred (340) feet to any residential dwelling (including
a mobile home) or residentially zoned property.
5. A Type "A" buffer with 6' opaque feature shall be provided
between any residentially zoned property or residential dwelling
unit (including a mobile home) and any area where materials are
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\2014UPDATE\""WI ff 5 11 AA i1 94
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
stockpiled, loaded/unloaded, mixed, or processed outside an
enclosed building.
6. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for the
facility, and once a year thereafter, the plant manager shall invite
and meet with community representatives to exchange contact
information and address actual and potential nuisances related to
the plant. The list of community representatives shall be
maintained by the Community Development,,department.
(11) Single-family subdivision special regulations
(a) The administrative permit process and criteria of;Tegulations for specific
land uses ordinance section 971''.04 '=shall apply.,.to single-family
subdivision projects.
J
(b) Additional information requaremls:
1. Location, width, composition, and a cross-section of each required
buffer.
(c) Criteria for single fcitnily'subdtuision
The single-family residential;.: subdivision project site shall be
located west of $,Z Avenue, shall abut residentially designated
property, and shall not be located or configured so as to project the
foot brint of a residential use into a commercial/industrial area.
`A" buffer with 6 foot opaque feature shall be provided as
;d subdivision improvement where the subdivision project
>perty designated C/I (Commercial/Industrial).
regulations
(a) The administrative permit process for an administrative permit approved
at staff -level and the criteria of regulations for specific land uses ordinance
section 971.04 shall apply to multi -family dwellings.
(b) Additional information requirements: A site plan meeting the
requirements of Chapter 914.
(c) Criteria for multi family dwellings:
1. All dwelling units shall be accessory to an allowed use within the
overlay area;
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIQ\2014UPDATE\WCT;#Oki* 5 12
95
2/10/14 Version
WGIC OVERLAY REGULATIONS
2. In cases where a residential unit is being used in conjunction with a
business in the same building, the total floor area of the residence
may exceed the total floor area of the business.
3. No ground floor dwelling unit shall front a street.
FACommunity Development\Gifford JAMMIM Mi
13
96
Indian River County List of Industrial "Best Management Practices" (BMPs)
Dust/Particulates and Run-off Pollution Prevention
1. Use mechanical dust and particulate recovery devices and equipment that incorporate the
best available technology for control of fugitive dust and air emissions.
2. Limit storing, stockpiling, handling, and processing materials to areas with hard (non-
porcus) surfaces such as pavement.
3. Use sprinkling systems to water driveway and materials storage, stockpile, handling, and
processing areas.
(a) Water frequently to prevent fugitive dust but avoid saturation which can lead to
unnecessary run-off and off-site tracking.
4. Maintain vegetation ground cover on the site area adjacent to materials storage, stockpile,
handling, and processing areas.
(a) Maintain full and tall windbreaks and landscape buffers around on-site uses that
may produce dust or off-site air emission of particulates.
5. Limit stockpiles to walled containment areas where possible, and limit stockpile heights
to 25' or lower if required to control dust.
6. Use curbing and other physical barriers to maintain separate management systems for
process water; run-off from wash -down and stockpile areas; and run-off from other areas
of the overall project site.
7. Keep sediment pits clean and outfall structures unclogged.
8. Use control measures identified in the project's Multi -Sector General Permit (MSGP) to
meet EPA's special numeric stormwater effluent limitations for facilities that store or
process the following:
• logs
• fertilizer (including input raw material and by-products)
• asphalt
• cement
• crushed stone and gravel
• sand
• coal
9. Use control measures identified in MSGP and NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System) permits to meet Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLS) for run-off.
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WG1Q\2014UPDATE\1ndustria1 RMPs.doc 1
A,ffACIHMENT 5 97
10. Promptly perform corrective actions needed for SWPPP (Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan) compliance items identified during county, state, or federal inspections.
Noise
Conduct noise -producing activities inside enclosed buildings, when possible.
2. Conduct noise -producing activities during weekday business hours, when possible.
3. Locate noise -producing activities away from adjacent residential, office, and commercial
uses.
4. Provide noise deflecting and/or noise -absorbing barriers around areas were noise -
producing activities are conducted.
5. Use and maintain equipment and vehicles that are designed to operate with reduced noise
levels.
Fire Protection and Hazardous Materials
1. Design and build equipment work areas, chemical storage areas, and loading/unloading
areas with spill containment features and locate such areas away from any waterbodies,
swales, or recharge ditches.
(a) Maintain an approved spill contingency plan in work, storage, and
loading/unloading areas.
(b) Maintain periodic worker training on spill contingency procedures, including
immediate and corrective actions, and the filing of incident reports.
(c) Maintain spill kits in work, storage, and loading/unloading areas.
2. Use double -lined fuel tanks with a secondary containment around the tanks.
3. Provide convenient and proper solid waste disposal for workers and for drivers entering
or exiting the site.
4. Label every 55 gallon drum and every container for fuel, chemical, by-product, and waste
including non -hazardous waste.
(a) All drums need to have lids secured and be kept in one common area marked
either Hazardous or Non Hazardous as per RCRA (Resource Conservation
Recovery Act)
(b) Containers and drums should be stored under covered (e.g. roofed) structures
and protected from exposure to precipitation.
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIQ Industrial 131 ftdoc 2
A'T,'ACHMENT 5
98
(c) A covered area or conex box or other appropriate container with spill
containment needs to be in place for solvents, anti freeze, used oil and used oil
filters, used rags, aerosol cans and lead acid batteries.
5. Maintain stockpiles of combustible material with adequate access for fire suppression to
each stockpile.
(a) Limit stockpile heights and sizes in a manner that prevents fires and
combustion of stored material and allows for proper separation between piles
as recommended or required by the Fire Department.
General
Display permits on-site.
2. Maintain on site a file of all approved plans, monitoring reports, inspections reports,
incident reports, and documentation of corrective actions.
3. Provide county staff and post at the site entrance an emergency contact that can handle
environmental and public safety incidents during and after business hours.
4. Provide 2' — 3' high "knee -walls" along driveway entrances and exits to confine spillage
to driveways and prevent spillage into roadside canals and swales.
(a) Collect trash and sweep -up spillage on driveway entrances and exits daily or
more often if needed.
Monitoring
Use independent third party to collect stormwater run-off and fugitive dust/air emissions samples
twice a year for the first 2 years of facility operation to demonstrate compliance with applicable
water quality and air quality standards. Sampling methodology [including DEP SOPs (standard
operating procedures)] to be approved or accepted by the applicable jurisdictional agency or
applicable county department(s) prior to commencement of facility operation. Sample data and
analysis of results to be provided twice a year to the applicable jurisdictional agency and
applicable county department(s). Stormwater run-off sampling shall be conducted for the
following:
• PH • total phosphorus
• specific conductance • iron
• turbidity • cooper
• TSS (total suspended solids) • oil, grease, gasoline
• total nitrogen
(a) Provide the county planning department a copy of each air quality and/or
water quality monitoring report submitted to a jurisdictional agency, including
any data or report on stack emissions.
FACommunity Development\Gifford (WGIC)\Industrial BMPs.doc 3
A���C+i 99
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator
FROM: Stan Boling,AICP
Community Development Director
DATE: February 10, 2014
SUBJECT: Review of INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC's Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Annual
Report
It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County
Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 18, 2014.
BACKGROUND
On December 20, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing to consider a request
from INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC for an economic development ad valorem tax exemption (tax
abatement). At that hearing, the Board considered INEOS's application together with staff's analysis
and input from the Property Appraiser's Office, Chamber of Commerce, and Economic Development
Council. Based on the evidence presented, the Board found that INEOS's proposed bioenergy facility
project qualified for tax abatement as a new business, found that INEOS's application scored in the
highest abatement award category under adopted scoring guideline, granted a 10 year tax abatement
beginning in 2013, adopted a tax exemption ordinance for the INEOS project, and approved a tax
exemption agreement with INEOS (see attachments 1, 2, and 3). The exemption applies to
approximately 30% - 40% of INEOS's total ad valorem tax bill and decreases during the 10 year
abatement period.
Since the December 20, 2011 hearing, INEOS completed project construction, and hired facility
personnel. In January 2013, INEOS filed its first annual report with the County as required by the tax
exemption agreement. That report indicated job and wage levels consistent with INEOS' tax abatement
application and information from the Florida Department of Revenue. Based on that information, on
February 19, 2013 the Board found that INEOS was in compliance with its ad valorum tax exemption
requirements. INEOS then applied to the Property Appraiser's Office for the exemption and the
exemption was granted for "property tax year" 2013. In January, 2014 INEOS filed its required annual
report.
Under requirements of the tax exemption agreement and the County's Chapter 1100 tax exemption
regulations (see attachment #4), INEOS is required to provide a number of new jabs at a high average
wage level, file an annual report on or before January 15th of each year beginning in 2013, abide by
representations made to the Board, and comply with tax exemption requirements. The annual report
filing provides the County with a convenient opportunity to verify compliance with tax exemption
requirements. If at any time the Board determines that INEOS is not in compliance, the Board may
revoke or revise the tax exemption.
FACommnnity Development\Users\CDADMIN\AGENDA\2014\INEOSAdValreport 021814.docx
100
Staff has reviewed INEOS's annual report filed January 2014 and verified INEOS's compliance with
tax exemption requirements, including representations made in its tax abatement application. At this
time, staff is bringing the January 2014 annual report and its analysis to the Board for consideration, and
requests that the Board find INEOS currently in compliance with its tax exemption requirements.
ANALYSIS
Over the last 4 years, INEOS obtained approval of economic development incentives, developed a
bioenergy production facility at the southwest corner of Oslo Road/74h Avenue (former Ocean Spray
site), and hired facility personnel as follows:
• Spring/summer 2010: coordinated with staff on local jobs grant and tax abatement incentives;
obtained BCC approval of local jobs grant.
• September 2010: obtained project site plan approval.
• March -November 2011: submitted tax abatement application and related information.
• December 2011: obtained BCC tax abatement approval (ordinance, agreement).
• March 2012: reported 41 employees
• June 2012: reported 49 employees
• September 2012: reported 53 employees
• December 2012: reported 56 employees
• January 2013: obtained C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) for plant site work and associated
permits, filed first tax abatement annual report.
• March 2013: reported 59 employees
• June 2013: reported 66 employees
• September 2013: reported 65 employees
• December 2013: reported 64 employees
In its January 2014 annual report (see attachment #6) , INEOS provided all the information required by
INEOS's tax abatement agreement, including information on the number of jobs, average wage, and
new capital investment in the plant, if any, for the 2013 report year. The report states that, in addition to
20 contract employees, the INEOS facility currently has 62 full time employees at an annual wage of
nearly $63,000 per employee (not including benefits). Staff has verified that the reported jobs and wage
information provided in the January 2014 report is consistent with information reported to the Florida
Department of Revenue. With respect to project capital investment the project has involved tens of
millions of dollars in improvements and equipment, as anticipated. Based upon the filed annual report
and verified items, staff has determined that INEOS has met applicable project -related and tax
abatement -related time frames and deadlines.
FACommunity Development\Users\CDADMIN\AGENDA\2014\INEOSAdValreport 021814.docx 2
101
As anticipated in the INEOS tax exemption application, the majority of the project's assessed value
consists of tangible personal property in the form of plant equipment. According to the Property
Appraiser's staff, INEOS's ad valorem tax bill for 2013 was $470,422.39 and the value of the ad
valorem tax exemption not included on that bill (savings to INEOS) was $286,589.92. These figures
are consistent with the tax abatement scenario considered by the Board at the time INEOS's tax
abatement application was approved.
As shown in the following table, INEOS has developed a targeted industry facility, provided or
exceeded the projected number of jobs, met average wage levels, and made project capital investments
consistent with representations reflected in its tax abatement application.
INEOS COMPLIANCE WITH TAX EXEMPTION REPRESENTATIONS
Application Actual 4th tr 2012 Actual 4th Otr 2013
Full Time Jobs
53
30points)
53
30points)
64
30points)
Average annual
wage
$58,981
30points)
$58,929
30points)
$62,900
30
oints
Level of local
capital
investment
*$54,337,677
20points)
*$52,500,000
20points)
**$47,092,901
20points)
Special
economic
Bio -energy
Bio -energy
Bio -energy
development
targeted
targeted
targeted
attributes
indust
10points)
industry
10points)
industry
10points)
Total Points
from Scoring
Matrix
90 points
90 points
90 points
*Estimated construction/installation value of real property improvements and tangible
personal property
* *Assessed value for ad valorem tax purposes: real and tangible personal property
After review of the INEOS January 2014 annual report, staff found that INEOS's 2013 actual
performance scored the same number of points under the County's scoring guidelines as scored by its
2011 tax abatement application. Therefore, staff has concluded that INEOS continues to qualify for its
economic development ad valorem tax exemption as granted by the Board on December 20, 2011.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners find that INEOS New Planet BioEnergy
LLC is currently in compliance with its ad valorem tax exemption requirements.
FACommunity Development\Users\CDADMIN\AGENDA\20I4\iNEOSAdValreport 021814.docx
102
ATTACHMENTS
1. Approved Minutes from December 20, 2011 Board Meeting
2. INEOS Tax Exemption Ordinance 2011-011
3. INEOS Tax Exemption Agreement
4. Excerpts from Chapter 1100
5. BCC minutes from 2/19/13 meeting
6. January 2014 Annual Report from INEOS
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM:
FOR: February 18, 2014
Indian River Co,
Approved
Date
Admin.
Legal
Budget
!2 /�
Dept.
2112 /y
Risk Mgr.
FACommunity Development\Users\CDADMIN\AGENDA\2014\1NEOSAdValreport 021814.docx 4
103
The Commissioners and Sheriff Loar discussed the ramifications of delaying this item
until the County Administrator, Management and Budget Director AAd Sheriff can meet and
return to the Board with a plan.
Chairman 'Wheeler suggested tabling this tter until January 10, 2012.
Commissioner Davis obsery that postponing this matter would give staff more time to
evaluate the suggested $300,0 appropriation, as well as provide time for the Commissioners to
review the Sheriff's qua -end financial data.
ON MOTION BY Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by
Commissioner Flescher, the Board unanimously approved
to TABLE this item until the January 10, 2012 Board of
County Commission meeting.
? 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
10.A.L CONSIDERATION OF INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC'S AEOUEST FOR AN
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEwnrw (TAX ABATEMENT)
(LEGISLATIVE)
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Planning Director Stan Boling, through a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file),
provided background description and conditions pertaining to INEOS New Planet BioEnergy
LLC's (INEOS) request for an economic development ad valorem tax exemption (tax
abatement). He presented an analysis and verification of INEOS's eligibility for the tax
abatement program which can be granted for up to ten years, with an annual decrease in scale.
He outlined the amounts of property taxes projected to be paid by INEOS and abated over a ten-
year period, reviewed the safeguards in the tax abatement program, and conveyed that the
December 20, 2011 11
104
Economic Development Council and staff recommend Board approval of the proposed
Ordinance granting an economic development ad valorem tax exemption to INEOS New Planet
Bioenergy, LLC, with the conditions outlined in staff's recommendation.
(Clerk's Note: Please see the Board's Motion for conditions referenced above)
The Chairman opened the Public Hearing.
There were no speakers, and the Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Solari SECONDED by
Commissioner Flescher the Board unanimously; (1) found
that the INEOS New Planet BioEnergy facility qualifies as
a "New Business" under the tax abatement ordinance; (2)
found that the application scores in the highest tax
abatement award category under the adopted scoring
guidelines; (3) granted a tax abatement using the schedule
for highest award category, with the 10 -year abatement
period to begin in 2013; (4) adopted Ordinance 2011-
011, amending Title XI of the Code of Indian River
County (Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax
Exemption) by creating a new section 1100.14 granting an
economic development ad valorem tax exemption to
INEOS New Planet Bioenergy, LLC; making findings and
providing for severability and an effective date; and (5)
authorized the Chairman to execute the Economic
Development Tax Exemption Agreement for INEOS New
Planet BioEnergy, LLC facility.
AGREEMENT ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
December 20, 2011 12
AeHNEW 1
105
41
A TRUE Copy
CERTIFICATION ON LASTPAGE
ORDINANCE NO. 2011- oil J.K. BARTON, CLERK
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING. TITLE XI OF THE
CODE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD
VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION) BY CREATING A NEW SECTION
1100.14 GRANTING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM
TAX EXEMPTION TO INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY, LIaC;
MAKING FINDINGS AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Title XI of the Code of .Indian River County, entitled "Economic
Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption," authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to
grant :economic development ad valorem tax exemptions {"Exemption") to certain new or
expanding businesses; and
WHEREAS, section 196.1995(10), Florida Statutes, requires that any action of the
Board granting an Exemption to a new or expanding business be set forth in an ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that all prerequisites to the granting of an
Exemption to INEOS New Planet BioEnergy, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, have
been met, and the granting of such Exemption will promote and strengthen the local economy
and thereby enhance the health, welfare and general well-being of the citizens of Indian Raver
County,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIWR COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT:
SECTION 1. ENACTMENT AUTHORI'T'Y.
Section 3, Article VII of the Florida Constitution and section 196.1995, Florida Statutes,
authorize the Board of County Commissioners to grant economic development ad valorem tax
exemptions to certain new and expanding businesses, upon majority vote in favor of such
authority in a referendum called for such purpose. In a referendum held on November 2, 2010, a
majority of voters in Indian River County voted in favor of such authority, and Title XI of the
Code of Indian River County, entitled "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption"
became effective.
SECTION 2. FINDINGS.
The Board finds that the above "Whereas" clauses are true and correct, and hereby
incorporates such clauses as findings of the Board, Additionally, the Board specifically finds
that INEOS New Planet BioEnergy, LLC meets the requirements of section 196.012(15), Florida
Statutes.
AnACHIY MT 2
106
A TRUE COPY
CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE
ORDINANCE NO. 2011 -0].1 J.K. BARTON, CLERK
SECTION 3. CREATION OF NEW SECTION.
Title M of the Code of Indian River County, Florida, is hereby amended to create section
1100. 14, as follows (new language underlined
Section 1100.14 Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Granted to INEOS New
planet Bioenerl y LLC ("Business"),
(1)
Tbis exemption shall apply onl to the improvements to real property and the 9DWble
rsonal My= d usin s' Mlication f r such e em do on file in the
county community development department
(2) The_ eatemption shall be for a terra of ten ( 10) years commencing in 2013 the first
year the new improvements and new tangible personal property will be added to the
assessment rollThe amount of the exemption shall be a specified,Ypercentage of county
ad yalorem taxes for the 0eneral Fund. Municipal Services Taxin
g.Units. and Emerrtencv
Services District which would otherwise be due with respect to the new b2mvements
and new tangible 2gggnal property in the absence of the exemption The approved
exemption percentages are as follow•
Year 1
(January 1, 2013 tax roll) ..........100%
Year 2
(January 1, 2014 tax roll) ..........
100%
Year 3
(January 1, 2015 tax rail) ..........
100%
Year 4
(January 1, 2016 tax roll) ..........
90°lo
Year 5
(January 1, 2017 tax roll) ..........
80%
Year 6
(January 1, 2018 tax roll) ..........
70%
Year 7
(January 1, 2019 tax roll) ..........
60%
Yeai 8
(January 1, 2020 tax roil) ..........
50%
Year 9
(January 1, 2021 tax roll) ..........
40%
Year 10 (January 1, 2020 tax roll) ...........
30%
(3) The total amount of revenue available to the 99=fiom ad valorem tax sources
for the currrent fiscal year is $72,845,660: the total amount of revenue lost to the County
for the current fiscal M by vufiie of economic developmentadvalorernl tax exemptions
currently in effect is $0• and the estimated revenue lqss to the County for the current
fiscal year if the exemlgic,� &first yeaz_hadbeen in effect is 1 3 951
(4) The exemption shall bo -Aub ject to all provisions set forth in sections 1100.01
through 1100.13. Without limitation the continuation of the exemption shall be
contingent upon Business' compliance with section 1100.10 relating to "Continuing
Performance."
A�" #wimEcrr 2.
107
Ir
d
ORDINANCE NO. 2011- o i l
(5) The Board specifically finds that Business meets the requirements of section
196.012(15). Florida Statutes.
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY.
If any part of this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of
competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such holding and
shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTIONS. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon 'enactment by the Board of County
Commissioners and filing with the Department of State.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press Journal, on the 5th day of
December . 2011, for a public hearing to be held on the 20a' day of December, 2011, at
which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner _ -q,0j„rj , seconded
by Commissioner Flescher , and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Ave
Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan -Ave
Commissioner Wesley S. Davis fte ^,
Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher Ave
Commissioner Bob Solari ,yre
The Chairman thereupon declared the ordinance duly passed and adopted this 20 day of
December, 2011.
BOARD OF COUNTY CONMSSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
'By: w
Gary C. Veeler, Chairman
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Alan S. Polackwi0 Sr., County Attorney
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the
2011.
�1�0�iuvaca'0abi1
oCM0F ' 3 :
es
ATTACHMEW Z
108
A TRUE COPY
CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE
J.K. BARTON, CLERK
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION AGREEMENT
FOR INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC FACILITY AT
925 74TR AVENUE SW, VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 200 day of December, 2011, by and between
Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County'D and INEOS New Planet
BioEnergy, LLC, a limited liability company, organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware ("Business").
WHEREAS, County has adopted the Indian River County Economic Development Ad
Valorem Tax Exemption Ordinance ("Ordinance"), set forth in Title XI of the Indian River County
WHEREAS, County has adopted Ordinance No. 2011 -011("Exemption Ordinance")
granting an economic development ad valorem tax exemption ("Exemption") to Business, and
WHEREAS, the Ordinance and the Exemption. Ordinance both provide that the Exemption
shall not be effective until County and Business enter into this Economic Development Ad Valorem
Tax Exemption Agreement ("Agreement"),
. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereby agree, as follows:
X. Recitals. The above recitals are true and convect and are incorporated herein.
2. Definitions. Unless otherwise stated, all capitalized terms herein shall have the
meaning set forth in the Ordinance.
3. Business' Representations, Covenants and Warranties. At all times during the term
of the Exemption, Business represents, covenants and warrants to County that: (a) all information
submitted by Business in the Application is, and was at the time of submittal, true and correct, (b) all
information submitted by Business in any annual report submitted pursuant to section 1100.10(b) of
the Code will be, at the time of submittal; true and correct, (c) each representation previously made by
Business to County's Board of County Commissioners in a public meeting was, and each
representation made by Business to County's Board of County Commissioners in the future will be, at
the time of such representation, true and correct, (d) • Business will fully perform and remain in full
compliance with all Exemption Requirements and all requirements of this Agreement, (e) without
limitation, Business will establish and continue to provide all jobs required for Business to qualify as a
New Business, as defined in the Ordinance ("Jobs"), (0 without limitation, the average wage paid by
Business with respect to the Jobs during each calendar quarter will be equal to or greater than the
average wage represented by Business in the Application, and (g) Business has not committed and will
not commit any Violation of Law (each of subparagraphs (a) through (f), "Commitment").
4. Annual Reports. On or before January 15a' of each year, beginning in 2013 and ending
in 2022, the applicant shall submit a status report to the County Community Development Department.
At a minimum, the report shall include the name, address, and contact information of the current owner
smeonwr 3
109
A TRUE COPY
CERTIFICATION ON LAST RAGE
J.K. BARTON, CLERK
And the current operator of the 'facility at 925 74`h Avenue SW, Vero Beach, Florida, a description of
current facility operations, the current total number of facility employees, the current total and average
wages of the employees, and a description of any improvements made to the facility during the
previous year. The report shall be signed by the facility owner (or authorized representative) and by
the facility operator, and each signature shall be notarized.
5. Violation by Business of Commitment: In the event of a violation by Business of any
Commitment, County may, in its sole discretion, (a) revoke or revise the Exemption, effective as of the
date of such action, or (b) revoke or revise the exemption, effective as of the date of violation of the
Commitment. In such case County, the Property Appraiser or the Tax Collector shall be entitled to
recover all or any portion of taxes not paid after the date of violation as a result of the Exemption, plus
interest, costs of collection and attorney's fees, as set forth in -section 1100.11(b) of the Code, or (c)
pursue any other remedy available in law or in equity. Business shall immediately notify County in
writing of any facts or events which constitute or may constitute a violation by Business of any
Commitment.
6. No Limitation of County's Rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a
restriction or limitation of County's rights as set forth in general law or the Code, including the
Ordinance and the Exemption Ordinance.
7. County's Right of Inspection. At any time during the term of the Exemption, County
shall have the right to inspect any of Business' books and records to determine Business' compliance
with all Exemption Requirements and all requirements of this Agreement; provided, however, that
nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted as relieving Business of its obligation to notify County in
writing of any facts or events which constitute or may constitute a violation by Business of any
Commitment, as set forth in paragraph 4 above.
8. Public Records. Business acknowledges that any records made or received by County
in connection with the Exemption are subject to the Public Records Act, Chapter 119, Florida Statutes.
9. Transfer of Property Subject to Exemption. Business shall notify County of any
transfer of real or personal property subject to the Exemption, within thirty (30) days of the date of
such transfer.
10. Form of Notice. Any notice hereunder shall be in -writing and delivered by (1) certified
mail, return receipt requested, (ii) overnight or priority mail, in a form providing proof of receiM or
(ii) hand delivery, with written acknowledgement of receipt by the recipient.
11. Interpretation. This Agreement has been submitted to the equal review and scrutiny of
both parties, and both parties agree that it fairly and accurately sets forth the terms their agreement. in
any dispute between the parties, the Agreement shall be given a fair and reasonable interpretation,
without consideration or weight being given to the fact that it was initially prepared or drafted by any
particular party.
12. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is deemed to be separate and divisible.
If any provision shall be held invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
Ruraw.pi4miWerCeu,.enVNF0.S.t�Yabxa Tcf}sgpWrAperwraeoe
"TACHM 3
N
110
r
13. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be. governed by and interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the State of Florida.
14. Jurisdiction and Venue. Exclusive jurisdiction for any proceedings arising out of or
relating to this Agreement shall be in the circuit court of the State of Florida. Venue shall be in Indian
River County, Florida.
15. Attorney's Fees, etc. In any legal proceedings arising out of or relating in any way to
this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover from the non -prevailing part all fees, costs and
expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees at all trial, appellate and collection
levels.
16. Waiver of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY HEREBY KNOWINGLY AND
.INTENTIONALLY WAIVES TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY ISSUE ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATING IN ANY WAY TO THIS AGREEMENT. ALL SUCH ISSUES SHALL BE
RESOLVED BY NON -JURY TRIAL•.
17. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by subsequent
written agreement signed by all parties and, with respect- to County, approved by County's Board of
County Commissioners.
M Sutcessors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their
successors and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date fust
written above.
STATE OF FLORIDA
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
ACFVCATRUEND=L71iCt
a
aTFHEOCR1l3.
K. KARTS
DATE -
Attest: Jeffrevl-
Approved:
M
INEOS New Planet MoEnergy, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company
By:
Print Name•
Its ManEagirtg
.BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO,
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
���
,Wte Approved by BCC: December . 20 2011.
�J
'.%proved. as to Form and Legal Sufficiency:
`'•..NANEF; G�� .r`
4ytlVYWMr•r• �. ,
By:
Li It Administrator , Alan S o ac ch, Sr., County Attorney
F•NavegtffwW�r.cwmrulD�?S.vP.lenrw T�Fa+wb.A,mnncdw
Anamm 3
K
Title XI. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION
Section 1100.10. - Continuing performance.
(a) The business shall continue to meet all exemption requirements during the term of the exemption;
(b) No later than March 1 of each year during the term of the exemption, the business shall provide an
annual report to the director which shall certify and, if requested by the director, contain satisfactory
proof, that the business continues to meet all exemption requirements;
(c) The business shall timely comply with all requirements of F.S. § 196.011, during the term of the
exemption; and
(d) The business shall immediately advise the county of any failure by the business to meet all exemption
requirements.
(Ord. No. 2010-014, §§ 1, 2, 6-22-10)
Section 1100.11. - Revocation of exemption.
(a) The board may revoke or revise the exemption at any time if the board determines in its sole
discretion that (1) the business no longer meets all of the exemption requirements, (2) the application
or any annual report contains a material false statement, such that the exemption likely would not have
been granted or continued if the true facts had been known, or (3) the business is found guilty of a
violation of law; and
(b) If it is determined that the business was not in fact entitled to an exemption in any year for which the
business received an exemption, the county, property appraiser or tax collector shall be entitled to
recover all taxes not paid as a result of the exemption, plus interest at the maximum rate allowed by
law, plus all costs of collection, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees.
(Ord. No. 2010-014, § § 1, 2, 6-22-10)
ATTACHMENT 4
FACommunity Deve1opmentlCurDev\BCC\2013 BCCIINEOSI 100.doc
112
The Chairman CALLED THE STION, and the
Motion carried unanim The Board unanimously
approved Re ion 2013-012, providing for the
of unsafe structures and the recovery of costs.
12.A.2. REviEWOFINEOSNEWPLANETBIOENERGYLLC'SAD VALOREM TAX
EMEW TIONANNUAL REPORT
Planning Director Stan Boling recalled the Board's adoption on December 20, 2011, of
Ordinance 2011-011, granting an -economic development ad valorem tax exemption to INEOS
New Planet BioEnergy, LLC. Through a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file), he reviewed
the key points of the first annual Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Report submitted by INEOS for
the year 2013, and presented staff's recommendation for the Board to find that INEOS is
currently in compliance with the ad valorem tax exemption requirements.
Commissioner O'Bryan voiced his support for the tax abatement program. He pointed
out that over the 10 -year exemption period, INEOS would be remitting at least twice as much in
property tax assessments than would have been abated in that same time period.
ON MOTION by Commissioner O'Bryan, SECONDED
by Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously found
that INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC, is currently in
compliance with its ad valorem tax exemption
requirements, as recommended in the memorandum of
February 7, 2013.
12.B. EMERGENCY SER VICES - NONE
February 19, 2013
11
ATTACHMENT 5
113
INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC 3030 Warrenville Road
Suite 650
Warrenville, IL 60532
630.857.7166 (office)
630.544.4050 (mobile)
1617�878�
January 12, 2014
Mr. Stan Boling
by
Planning Director
Indian River County
Community Development Department
1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
RE: INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC's Request for an Economic Development Ad
Valorem Tax Exemption (Tax Abatement) — Annual Report
Dear Stan,
Attached is the initial required annual status report in conjunction with the Board of
County Commissioners' approval of an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax
Exemption (Tax Abatement) on December 20, 2011.
The report has been signed by David W. T. King, Site Director, INEOS New Planet
BioEnergy LLC as "operator"; and, Daniel Cummings, President, INEOS New Planet
BioEnergy LLC as "owner". Both are authorized representatives, respectively.
Once you have had an opportunity to review our submission, please do not hesitate to
contact myself with any questions or clarifications.
Sincerely,
��L
. Vokaty, Jr.
Controller
INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC
ATTACHMENT 6
114
INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC
RE: INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC's Request for an
Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption (Tax
Abatement)
Annual Report, re: 2013 Year
January 12, 2014
Current Owner
Daniel Cummings, President, INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC;
3030 Warrenville Road, Suite 650, Lisle, Illinois 60532-3606
Current Operator
David W. T. King, Site Director, INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC;
92574 th Avenue,,S..W.., Vero Beach, Florida. 32968-9755
Description of Currey cilit,y Ooetations
The INEOS New Planet BioEnergy facility is the first commercial scale facility
employing the INEOS Bio Bioenergy technology. Utilizing a unique combination
of gasification and fermentation processes, the facility is demonstrating key
equipment at full commercial scale using vegetative and yard waste as feedstock.
The site is steadily moving towards stable operations in 2014, focusing on
improving performance metrics throughout the year.
Current Total Number of Facility Employees
62 full time employees and 20 Contract employees as of December 31, 2013
Current Total and Average Wages of the Employees
Total current annualized wages (excluding fringe benefits) are approximately
$3.9 million, averaging nearly $63 thousand per employee.
1
ATTACHMENT 6
115
Description of any Improvements Made to the Facility during the
Previous Year
The estimated valuation of personal property investment during 2013 was
approximately $4 million. Post project reviews will be performed to ensure
correct classifications for county tax reporting in April, 2014.
Local Impact
This project has had significant positive impact to the local community. Existing
area businesses that provide professional services and products have benefited
from the project during the main construction (i.e., 2011-2012) and are continuing
as the plant reaches full operations going forward. To date, building this facility
has meant more than $30 million of direct investment into Florida's economy and
more than $2 million of spending on goods and services on an annual basis.
The biomass gasification process produces renewable power from a steam
turbine, which runs the plant, and at full capacity, deliver electricity to over 1,400
homes in the local community. The facility has been producing renewable power
since September, 2012.
:,+pyr •ry USATAVLOR EVANS
Submitted by: :►. MY COMMISSION# FF 029866
ezEXPIRES: June 28 2017
Bonded Teti Irony Pwecc undembrs
ai
David W. T. King
Site Director
INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC
C�)� ��, av
Daniel M. Cummings
President
INEOS New Planet BioEnergy LLC
2
Dated
/// 0 / /C, --
Dated
ATTACHMENT 6
f iCli
Departmental Matters
Indian River County pr
Inter -Office Memorandum
Office of Management and Budget
TO:
Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE:
February 12, 2014
SUBJECT:
Fire Rescue Rolling Stock —
Five -Year Replacement Plan
FROM:
Jason E. Brown
Director, Management & Budget
Background
On February 11, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to provide an update on the
Fire Rescue fleet along with a five-year plan to catch up on the scheduled replacement of vehicles for
the District. Please find the requested information included herein. As discussed at the meeting, staff
has delayed the replacement of vehicles in the fleet over the last few years in.order to avoid an
increase in the millage rate in light of a reduction of 31% in the taxroll for the Emergency Services
District. Staff made an administrative decision to maintain staffing levels necessary to continue
providing a high level of service to the public as opposed to maintaining a regular equipment
replacement schedule during the economic downturn. In accordance with Board direction, staff has
performed an analysis of the front line ambulances, engines and ladder/quint vehicles and has
prepared a five-year plan to catch up on the delayed replacement schedule. Please note the District
has several other pieces of rolling stock that are essential in providing services, such as brush trucks,
special ops, and staff vehicles. These vehicles are not specifically included in the analysis, however,
the District will need to replace several of these assets over the next five years as well. Additionally,
this analysis does not include additional vehicles needed to equip any new stations opened over the
next five years. These vehicles can be funded from a combination of impact fees, Optional Sales Tax,
and District (ad valorem) funds.
Table 1 below shows the model year and mileage of the District's ambulances. These vehicles typically
have a useful life of about 6 years. However, due to the delayed replacement of these items as
discussed above, currently eight (8) out of the twelve (12) front line vehicles are over six (6) years old.
The average mileage on the front line vehicles is 124,138 as of January 31, 2014. The District also has
four (4) spare units to provide coverage when one of the front line vehicles must be taken out of service
for repairs or routine maintenance. These vehicles are all at least ten (10) years old and have an
average of 152,070 miles.
Table 2 shows the same information for the District's fire pumpers, Ladder 1, and Quint 9. These
vehicles typically have a useful life of ten (10) to twelve (12) years. Currently, five (5) of the thirteen
(13) front line vehicles are ten (10) years old or more. One of the older vehicles is Ladder 1, which is
ten (10) years old at this time. The useful life on ladder trucks can normally be extended with a major
overhaul. Due to the high cost of replacing this vehicle, staff recommends an overhaul during the five-
year timeframe to extend its useful life.
117
Board of County Commissioners
Page 2of5
February 12, 2014
Table 1 — Fire Rescue Ambulance Fleet Detail
Vehicle Descri tion
Fleet #
Year
Milea e
Front Line Vehicles
Med 1
709
2008
71,177
Med 2
725
2009
92,198
Med 3
702
2004
178,471
Med 4
726
2009
121,960
Med 5
724
2007
145,764
Med 6
716
2003
176,322
Med 7
708
2011
50,572
Med 8
745
2007
86,071
Med 9
723
2007
154,621
Med 10
720
2004
177,937
Med 11
721
2004
171,410'`
Ops 5
718
2004
63,148*
Average — Front Line Vehicles
Spare/Reserve Vehicles
Spare 1 717 2003
125,509
149,967
Spare 2
719
2004
121,150*
Spare 3
755
2002
157,445
Spare 4
757
2002
179,716
Average — Spare Vehicles
162,376
*Denotes broken/replaced odometer. Some mileages are estimates. In cases of brokenlreplaced
odometers, the mileage total was not used in calculating the average mileage for the fleet.
118
Board of County Commissioners
Page 3 of 5
February 12, 2014
Table 2 — Fire Rescue Engine Fleet Detail
Vehicle Descri tion
Front Line Vehicles
Engine 1
Fleet #
562
Year
2008
Mileage
56,264
Engine 2
563
2008
49,873
Engine 3
574
2005
97,658
Engine 4
503
2011
30,156
Engine 5
582
2004
16,440*
Engine 6
542
1999
106,632
Engine 7
564
2007
91,760
Engine 8
541
1998
123,384
Quint 9
581
2004
100,000*
Engine 10
535
2005
111,268
Engine 11
560
2005
87,432
Engine 12
561
2009
57,889
Ladder 1
584
2004
120,000*
Average — Front Line Vehicles
86,026
Spare/Reserve Vehicles
Engine Spare 1 504 1998
117,600
Engine Spare 2
502 1996
109,858
Engine Spare 3
544 1998
165,000*
Average — Spare Vehicles
130,819
*Denotes broken/replaced odometer. Some mileages are estimates. In cases of broken/replaced
odometers, the mileage total was not used in calculating the average mileage for the fleet.
119
Board of County Commissioners
Page 4 of 5
February 12, 2014
iliiw Analysis
Staff has prepared an analysis to determine a five-year catch up period to restore the front line fleet to
the planned useful life. As noted before, eight (8) of the twelve (12) front line ambulances are over six
(6) years old. Therefore, these vehicles will need to be replaced. One ambulance was approved for
replacement last year. This unit is currently being manufactured and should be delivered in the next
three (3) months. Staff proposes the replacement of the seven (7) remaining units over the next three
years as shown in Table 3 below. At that time, however, the fleet will have aged further, and three
additional units will be over 6 years old. If the District continues to replace 2 units per year in FY
2016/17 and 2017118, all twelve (12) of the front line ambulances will have been replaced during the
next five years, and none will exceed 6 years of age.
Five (5) out of the thirteen (13) front line engines, quint, and ladder truck are ten (10) years old or older.
One (1) replacement engine was budgeted during the current year. This engine is being manufactured
and should be delivered this fiscal year. Staff recommends the replacement of one engine per year
over the five-year period. In one of these years, the District will need to replace the quint located at
Station 9. This unit is a higher cost item than the standard engine. For the purposes of this analysis,
the quint is scheduled for replacement in fiscal year 2016/17. At that point, this vehicle will be thirteen
(13) years old. It is important to note that this is a projection only. Some items may need replacement
at an earlier date due to unforeseen mechanical issues. Likewise, some units may continue to perform
well and have expected replacement dates delayed somewhat. At the end of the five-year plan, all
front line vehicles over thirteen (13) years old at that time will have been replaced, with the exception of
Ladder 1, which will have received a significant refurbishment as discussed earlier.
Table 3 - Projected Five -Year Replacement Schedule
Item
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Total -T7
Desai on
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
2016/17
2017/18
Years
Ambulance Replacements
P.0.67637
$225,000
$225,000
3 additional
$700,000
$700,000
replacements
2 replacements
each year
$470,000
$480,000
$490,000
$500,000
$1,940,000
Total -
Ambulances
$925,000
$470,000
$480,000
$490,000
$500,000
$2,865,000
Engine Replacements
P.0.68648
$465,000
$465,000
1 engine
$490,000
$505,000
$535,000
$1,530,000
1 quint
$800,000
$800,000
Refurbish
$250,000
$250,000
ladder
Total -
Engines
$465,000
$490,000
$505,000
$800,000
$785,000
$3,045,000
Total - Front
Line Vehicles
$1,390,000
$960,000
$985,000
$1,290,000
$1,285,000
$5,910,000
120
Board of County Commissioners
Page 5 of 5
February 12, 2014
Funding-
Staff
unding
Staff proposes utilizing a combination of Optional Sales Tax and Emergency Services District (ad
valorem) funds to finance the projected five-year replacement plan. Availability of funding each fiscal
year will need to be evaluated as we move forward. The projected schedule represents an acceleration
over the funding levels included in the current Capital Improvements Plan (approved by the BCC
November 19, 2013).
Staff recommends the use of Optional Sales Tax funds for the three (3) additional ambulances during
the current fiscal year. It should be noted that these vehicles will probably be delivered after the end of
the current fiscal year. The funding sources and final amounts for next fiscal year (2014/15) will be
included in the proposed budget. Furthermore, staff will include an updated funding plan for the
remaining three years of the plan in the next Capital Improvements Plan update during the normal
process this fall. It should be restated that the projected catch-up plan is only a projection and the
actual replacement schedule will vary from this initial proposal. Availability of funding will be limited,
and adjustments to the projected plan may be necessary. Additionally, this schedule does not include
funding for the other rolling stock (e.g. brush trucks, special ops, staff vehicles), or additional vehicles
needed to equip any new service locations that may be added over the next five years.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners provide conceptual approval of the projected five-
year plan for the replacement of front line Fire Rescue vehicles. Additionally, staff recommends that
the Board approve a budget amendment in the amount of $700,000 from Optional Sales Tax reserves
for the purchase of three (3) replacement ambulances and additional capital necessary to provide Fire
Rescue Services for the current fiscal year.
APPROVED AGENDA ITEM:
B
Jo tountph A. Baird
Cy
Y. Administrator
FOR: February 18, 2014
Indian River County
Approved
Date
Administrator
�a
County Attorney
Budget
2� J
Department
Z.
X
121
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
Date: January 30, 2014
To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services 0
Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Ato
Subject: Sewer Feasibility Study for the Summerplace Area —Results
UCP 4101
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS:
On August 20th, 2013, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Work
Order No. 4 with Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, L.L.C., to provide professional services to investigate
the feasibility of installing centralized sewer services. The analysis evaluated three primary
alternatives. Indian River Board of County Commissioners has made cleaning the Lagoon a focal point
in their agenda. With regards to helping the Lagoon the County passed a strict landscape and
fertilizer ordinance October 1St, 2013. The subject area primarily consists of residential properties and
was selected due to its proximity to the Lagoon.
EDUCATION/RESEARCH:
Numerous symposiums on the health of the Lagoon have addressed potential impacts from existing
septic systems. Primarily, sewer systems help to ensure that wastewater that is discharged back
into the environment is sanitary, safe and free of potentially harmful pollutants. The presentation
on the Nutrients and Water Quality in the Indian River Lagoon by Dr. Brian Lapointe have indicated
approximately 1 -million KG of Nitrogen per year added to the Indian River Lagoon via septic
systems. These studies have confirmed that high levels of Aqueous 15 Nitrogen (625 N) in
groundwater and surface water are a result of human waste. A well designed and installed
centralized sewer system will prevent dissolved nutrients from entering the water table and
ultimately help reduce the nutrient loading into the Lagoon.
ANALYSIS/ENGINEERING:
Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, L.L.C., evaluated three alternatives in the Sewer Feasibility study for
the Summerplace Area. The three alternatives included the evaluation of a gravity system, vacuum
system and a low pressure system. Also, included is a discussion of the Septic Tank Effluent
Pumping (STEP) system. The South East Sub Area (along Barefoot Place and Shell Lane) has been
analyzed as a gravity option in both the vacuum and the low pressure system analyses due to
geometric lay -out and lack of utility easements.
The Summerplace area evaluated in the subject study encompassed an area generally described as
bounded by SR -510 to the south, the Atlantic Ocean to the east, Old Orchid Sub Division to the
122
west and 96th Place to the north. Since, the study area primarily consists of residential properties
the cost was evaluated on a per parcel basis.
The following table summarizes the findings for each alternative:
Alternative
Project Cost
Per Parcel Cost
Gravity
$ 3,049,250.56
$ 11,335.50
Vacuum (Gravity within the
Southeast Sub Area)
$ 3,450,587.26
$ 12,827.46
Low Pressure (Gravity within the
Southeast Sub Area)
$ 6,005,592.32
$ 22,325.62
The subject study recommended the vacuum alternative as the preferred method for a centralized
sewer system. Although, this alternative carries a higher construction cost over the gravity
alternative the vacuum system was chosen for its least impacts and disturbance to the
Summerplace neighborhood during construction.
There are numerous benefits to be gained by construction of a sanitary sewer collection and
conveyance system in the study area. One primary benefit of the sanitary sewer collection and
conveyance system construction in the study area is the reduction in TMDL loadings to the Lagoon.
FINANCING/FUNDING:
Currently there are no funding programs/mechanisms available to assist homeowners replacing
failing systems or installing new systems, other than financing the impact fee. The impact fee can
be financed for a 5 -year period. Currently projects constructed as part of an assessment can be
financed for a 10 -year period. Although, the County has not financed any capital cost beyond a 10 -
year period in the past, other jurisdictions in Florida have financed capital projects for a 20 -year
period. Therefore, staff included a 20 -year option in the table below. Staff has also explored grant
prospects as a funding mechanism to offset some of the project cost. One such grant the staff is
evaluating is the Cooperative Funding for FY 2014-2015 administered by St. Johns River Water
Management District. Obtaining grant funds to help reduce the large capital costs will be critical to
ensure project success.
Financing Mechanisms
Parcels
5 -Yr Plan - Avg
10 -Yr Plan — Avg
20 -Yr Plan- Avg
Connecting-
Monthly Payment
Monthly Payment
Monthly Payment
Share
Study Area -Customers
1 100
$ 250.67
1 $ 140.70
$ 85.72
Note: The cost per parcel is based on $ 12,827.46
These cost do not include the impact fee charge of $ 2,796/ERU
123
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board to Authorize/Approve the following:
• Determine the next phase.
• Present the findings to the Summerplace Home Owners Association.
• Publish both feasibility studies on the County web site
ATTACHMENT(s):
1. Due to the file size and enormity of the study, only the recommendations from the Sewer
Feasibility Study dated 1/9/14 are attached as part of the agenda. The entire study is
available for viewing at the Board of County Commission Office located at 180127th
Street, Building A in Vero Beach FL,
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
Mill� !� MA!_1� j
JoseXA—Baird,
•
Vie
Indian River Co.
Appr ved Date
Administration
Legal
Budget
Utilities
(2
Utilities -Finance
F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\IRC - Sewer Feasibility Studies UCP # 4101\2. Summerplace Area\Agenda -
Summer Place Sewer Feasibility Results.doc
124
V. Recommendations:
Summary:
Construction costs are one of many parameters that are considered when evaluating and
recommending a sewer system to serve the Summerplace service area. Favorable
consideration has been given to the system that will provide environmental benefits to the
lagoon, provide reliable continuous operation (i.e. during prolonged storm induced power
outages), minimize impacts and disturbance to the neighborhoods, and minimize
maintenance requirements to the utility.
Construction Costs: In order to provide a sewer system that meets the goals of this project
- to eliminate the detrimental impacts to the lagoon caused by septic systems, and to
reduce the risk of any system failures that would also cause immeasurable harm to the
environment - costs for the three respective systems included design specifications that
would meet these goals. This meant that systems would not be piecemealed but would be
constructed in a single phase as a complete functional system - connecting every home
within the service area. In addition, systems would need to be monitored and / or alarmed,
and systems would require back up / emergency power supply. Providing these necessary
features has increased the cost for all three systems. The system costs, in order of least
costly to most costly, are as follows:
-1. Gravity sewer system: $ 3,049,250.56
-2. Hybrid Vacuum/Gravity System: $3,450,587.26
-3. Hybrid Low Pressure/Gravity System: $6,005,592.32
Environmental benefits: it is clear that both the gravity and vacuum systems will effectively
eliminate almost any possible environmental damage that is caused by existing septic
systems and has the least risk associated with potential accidents / failures of the
implementation of each respective system. In contrast, the low pressure system is not as
simple or as reliable as these systems — it has many characteristics that contribute to its
unreliability and vulnerability for failure, including: numerous electrical and mechanical
system parts and components, most of which are decentralized; increased vulnerability to
environment (salt air, flooding); limited monitoring capabilities; limited storage capacity.
Impacts and disturbance to the neighborhoods: The gravity system will have the greatest
impact and disturbance on the neighborhood. Short term impacts include: road closures
and landscape damage caused by sewer main installation; continuous noise, potential
minor flooding and irrigation well failures from de -watering operations; excessive dust,
vibration and noise due to road reconstruction. Long term impacts could include translated
vibratory compaction damage to structures, salt water intrusion in the shallow aquifer; and
loss of specimen canopy trees. Vacuum and low pressure systems, like any construction
within an established community, will cause disturbances to the neighborhoods. However,
paved streets and improved driveways are not anticipated to be damaged and in need of
reconstruction, and there will be little need for de -watering operations. Therefore, the
construction is anticipated to create much less disturbance to the neighborhood, and will
be of a shorter duration, with less intense noise and dust, and little if any vibration.
Page 21 of 25
125
Maintenance requirements to the utility: It is clear that the gravity system has the least
maintenance and long term operation requirements, and will be the most cost effective to
operate. This is the standard system used in the majority of development projects in IRC,
and IRCDUS is adept at'and experienced in the maintenance and long term operation of
these systems. The vacuum system requires similar, but a little more maintenance and will
cost a little more to operate due to maintenance time (man-hours) and electrical costs (for
pump station). Major components that require additional efforts are the central vacuum
pump station, which has an additional two vacuum pumps, and the valve pits at each home
site, which require inspections and adjustments on occasion. IRC personal interviewed for
this project, which operates and maintains the vacuum system in the Rockridge
community, has indicated that the system in Rockridge has run very efficiently and without
problems for five years. (Note: This system was a replacement for an inefficient and
unreliable low pressure system). In contrast, the low pressure systems require a significant
amount of maintenance — and it is estimated that 9 to 12 service calls would be made per
month.
Conclusion:
The low pressure system does not provide the reliability needed to meet the goals of this
project, and in an attempt to design this system with the goals of this project in mind, the
costs for a low pressure system are uneconomical. Therefore, the low pressure system
should not be considered for implementation for Summerplace.
Both the gravity sewer system and the vacuum systems meet the environmental goals for
this project. Construction costs are within 12% of each other, and actual bid costs may
fluctuate as much as 20% from this estimate, and may fluctuate as much as 20% from high
to low bidder on either system when final design and permitting is completed and it is bid
publicly. Based on the construction costs alone, there is not a clear favorite.
Summerplace area is a unique residential community with many narrow unpaved lanes
with large oak tree and cabbage palm canopy covering the right of way, and native
vegetation preserved throughout the community. Many of its homes were built in the
1960's and 1970's, and at least '/2 prior to 1983. Most homes depend on the shallow
aquifer for irrigation, and have structure and foundation systems that would not meet
current building codes. While unique, in some respects, the community is frail. The vacuum
system is anticipated to have the least impact and disturbance to this community — and
should leave it intact and without permanent damage. Its operation costs are not much
higher than the gravity system costs, and IRCDUS experience with the Rockridge
community's vacuum system is favorable. Therefore, after consideration of the vacuum
sewer systems construction costs, environmental benefits to the lagoon, reliability,
impacts and disturbance to the neighborhood, and maintenance requirements to the
utility, this system is recommended for implementation to provide sewer collection
for the Summerplace service area.
Page 22 of 25
126
SEINER COLLECTION SYSTEM
FEASIBILITY STUDY
IRCDUS UCP # 4101
SUMMERPLACE AND OCEAN AIRE SUBDIVISIONS
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
SITE DATA
CLIENT: IRCDUS
1801 27TH STREET
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA
ENGINEER: SCHULKE, BITTLE AND STODDARD, L.L.C.
1717 INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD
SUITE 201
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
(772)770-9622
SITE LOCATION: SUMMERPLACE SUBDIVISION AND
OCEAN AIRE SUBDIVISION
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
►a.J-.I.
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING •LAND PLANK/NG- ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
f CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION NO.: 00008668
ow 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
K"cW.
ii -4 TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com
FIZ,IFBI
/Q.G - /
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
FEASIBILITY STUDY
IRCDUS UCP # 4101
SUMMERPLACE AND OCEAN AIRE SUBDIVISIONS
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
'
CONTENTS
FEASIBILITY STUDY
BACKGROUND/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION
P. 1
II
GENERAL DESCRIPTION - ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS
P. 3
III
EXISTING PROJECT SERVICE AREA
P. 5
IV
SEWAGE SYSTEM ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
P. 7
V
RECOMMENDATIONS
P.21
POST SCRIPT
STEP SYSTEM
P. 23
FINANCING
P. 25
APPENDIX
SECTION A
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
A-1 to A-4
SECTION B
GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEM
B-1 to B-5
SECTION C
VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM
C-1 to C-6
SECTION D
LOW PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM
D-1 to D-6
SECTION E
EXISTING LIFT STATION AT WABASSO BEACH
E-1
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEER/NG -LAND PLA NN/NG- EAl VIRONMEN TA L PERMITTING
CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION NO.: 00008668
10 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
K C liboammft TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 7721770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com
la& -a
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: Arjuna Weragoda, Capital Projects Manager, Indian River
County Department of Utility Services
From: Joseph Schulke, PE — project manager, SBS
Date: January 9, 2014
Re: Summerplace Area Sewer Feasibility Study
Background / Project Description
The Indian River Lagoon is North America's most diverse estuary with more than
4,300 species of plants and animals, including 35 that are listed as threatened or
endangered, more than any other estuary in North America. The Lagoon varies in
width from .5 to 5 miles (0.80 to 8.0 km) and averages 4 feet (1.2 m) in depth. It
serves as a spawning and nursery ground for many different species of oceanic
and lagoon fish and shellfish. The lagoon also has one of the most diverse bird
populations anywhere in America. Nearly 1/3 of the nation's manatee population
lives here or migrates through the Lagoon seasonally. In addition, its ocean
beaches provide one of the densest sea turtle nesting areas found in the Western
Hemisphere.
The Lagoon has faced challenges and adversity over the years, and has seen the
reduction in Fishery populations, the loss of salt marshes and mangrove wetlands,
and shellfish harvesting areas are shrinking every year and are being closed. While
there are many contributing factors, numerous symposiums on the health of the
Lagoon have identified the proliferation of residential septic systems as one of the
significant contributors to the degradation of the lagoon. IRC's relatively flat
topography, sandy soils and high groundwater tables compound the problems
caused by septic systems — the high groundwater table and sandy soils permit
effluent to flow freely and enter the groundwater without sufficient treatment, the
high groundwater tables limit absorption rates, causing effluent to surface above
the drainfields where it can further contaminate untreated stormwater run-off -
which discharges directly into receiving waters and ultimately the Lagoon.
The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners has decided that the
health of the Lagoon should be one of the county's top priorities, and it has
recognized that the Summerplace community of approximately 269 homes is one of
several areas in the county that significantly contributes to the continued
degradation of the health of the lagoon because of its close proximity to the lagoon
and its reliance on private septic systems for domestic waste disposal. Of the 269
homes in the community, approximately 117 homes were built prior to the adoption
of more stringent codes in 1983 related to the design, installation and operation of
septic systems.(see Appendix - Section A, sheet A-2 — "Existing Septic System
Location Map"). Consequently, with the support of many residents from the
Summerplace area, a decision was made to evaluate the feasibility of bringing
sewer services to the many residents currently on septic systems. This is expected
Page 1 of 25
i Zb -3
to have a net positive benefit to the Lagoon. The study should consider and favor a
system that will provide environmental benefits to the lagoon, provide reliable
continuous operation (i.e. during prolonged storm induced power outages),
minimize impacts and disturbance to the neighborhoods, minimize maintenance
requirements to the utility, and will be economical to install. The feasibility study
will facilitate decision making on whether to install a new centralized sewer system
in the Summerplace area, and it is expected that the study can also be utilized as a
guideline to evaluate other residential areas using septic systems in lieu of
centralized sewer systems.
Schulke Bittle and Stoddard, L.L.0 (SBS) has prepared this Technical
memorandum - a feasibility study of the three alternatives to provide a
centralized sewer utility collection system to serve the Summerplace area,
including a gravity collection system, vacuum system, and low pressure system. In
addition, SBS has prepared a limited discussion on the merits and disadvantages
of a "Septic Tank and Effluent Pump" (STEP) system. This technical memorandum
presents SBS's findings and recommendations. This document may be used
to form the basis for discussions to be held with the County to select the
alternative to pursue for a design and construction effort.
(See attached Location Map and Existing Study Area Plan — Appendix Section `A')
Page 2 of 25
11. General Description —Alternative Systems:
Gravity Collection System: A gravity collection system is considered the
conventional traditional and preferred centralized sewer collection system. This
system is in use throughout the Indian River County utility service area. It typically
consists of 6" PVC sewer service connections at each lot line, which drains to a
network of 8" PVC gravity sewer collection mains and manholes typically routed
down the center of the streets, which drains to a central pumping "lift" station. The
sewage is then pumped in the conventional way via sewage pumps into a 4"
pressure sewer force main which connects and discharges into the existing public
utility infrastructure. (Typically a connection to an existing nearby centralized sewer
transmission force main, which will route the sewage to an existing nearby central/
regional pumping "lift" station). The sewage is then re -pumped via submersible
sewage pumps into and through a series of larger diameter pressure sewer
transmission mains to the wastewater treatment plant.
Emergency backup power is easily provided in case of power outages (i.e. during a
Hurricane) because all power needs are centralized at the pump station.
A gravity system necessarily slopes and requires deep excavations for installation,
and typically will have a significant impact and disturbance to the adjacent streets,
infrastructure and vegetation.
This system has high up -front costs due to the system requirements, including the
deep installation depth of the large diameter (8") gravity sewer mains, numerous
manhole structures (400 ft. max. apart), and a large and deep dual submersible
sewage pumping station.
Once in operation, this system requires very low maintenance, is the least
expensive system to operate, and is considered very reliable.
Vacuum System: The vacuum system is a relatively new sewer collection system,
first being used in the United States in the late 1960's and early 1970's. IRCDUS
has recently installed (2007/ 2008) an AIRVAC vacuum system in the Rockridge
community of predominantly single-family residential homes (500 +/- home sites). A
collection chamber is placed at each lot line to receive wastewater from the
household. This chamber holds a small amount (typically up to 10 gal) of sewage.
The liquid level triggers a valve to open, and the sewage is vacuumed out from the
chamber and through a 3" service lateral and into a network of small diameter (4" to
8") vacuum mains typically routed along the side of the street, which discharge into
a vacuum vessel and storage tank at the site of the vacuum / pump station. The
sewage is then pumped in the conventional way via sewage pumps into a pressure
sewer force main which connects and discharges into the public utility
infrastructure. Typically a connection is made to an existing nearby centralized
sewer transmission force main, which will route the sewage to an existing nearby
central/ regional pumping "lift" station. The sewage is then re -pumped via
submersible sewage pumps into and through a series of larger diameter pressure
sewer transmission mains to the wastewater treatment plant.
Emergency backup power is easily provided in case of power outages (i.e. during a
Hurricane) because all power needs are centralized at the vacuum/ pump station.
Page 3 of 25
la(ts-
The system design attributes — small diameter vacuum mains which are flat lying,
require relatively shallow installation depth and narrow trench width — and permit
the construction of the mains with minimal impact and disturbance of the adjacent
streets, infrastructure and vegetation.
A vacuum system will have a high upfront cost due to the high cost of the collection
chambers and the vacuum / pump station. To reduce upfront costs, the installation
of the collection chambers can be deferred until each household is ready to
connect.
While not meeting the same standard as a gravity system, this system is
considered reliable with low maintenance requirements and costs.
Low pressure system: A grinder lift station (pumping station) is placed at each lot
line to receive wastewater from the household (typically one or two homes per
station). The "wet well' of the lift station holds approximately 100 to 150 gal of
sewage. The liquid level triggers the pump in the wet well to operate, and the
sewage is pumped out of the wet well and into an adjacent low pressure small
diameter sewer force main system (typically 4" diameter) which is generally routed
along the side of the street. These low pressure mains typically connect to and
discharge into the public utility infrastructure: either an existing nearby gravity
sewer collection system or existing nearby centralized sewer transmission force
main, which will route the sewage to an existing nearby central/ regional pumping
"lift" station. The sewage is then re -pumped via submersible sewage pumps into
and through a series of larger diameter pressure sewer transmission mains to the
wastewater treatment plant.
IRCDUS currently has a low pressure system it has been operating for 15+ years in
the River Lake Estates/Oak Island Subdivisions, located north of 73`d Street, east of
U.S. Highway 1.
Emergency backup power is not easily provided for this type of system in the case
of power outages (i.e. during a Hurricane) because all power needs are de-
centralized, and power is required at each individual grinder lift station.
The system design attributes — small diameter low pressure sewer force mains
which are flat lying, require relatively shallow installation depth and narrow trench
width - permit the construction of the mains with minimal impact and disturbance of
the adjacent streets, infrastructure and vegetation.
Low pressure sewer systems were developed initially as a low cost alternative to a
conventional gravity sewer system. The primary savings is in the low "up front"
costs associated with the construction of small diameter pressure mains in lieu of
the 8" gravity sewer mains, and because the grinder lift station costs can be
deferred until construction of homes progresses.
The low pressure system is the least reliable system, and will require substantial
weekly, monthly and annual maintenance to the many individual lift stations, and
will cost significantly more than a standard gravity system to operate.
Page 4 of 25
111. Existing Project Service Area:
The Summerplace project service area is located to the north of the intersection of
SR A -1-A and CR510. The service area is approximately 85.3+/- acres and has
approximately 269 home sites. The project service area is served by Indian River
County potable water mains and private home site septic systems. The service
area is located approximately 'h mile from the Indian River Lagoon, and less than
% mile from the shoreline of Michael creek, a tributary to the Indian River Lagoon,
and the service area's eastern limit is adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean. There are
little formal drainage conveyance systems in the area, and drainage relies heavily
on sheet flow to depressional areas and percolation of run-off into the sandy soils.
Topography varies from el. 14.0 ft. +- NGVD to 8.0 ft. NGVD east of SR A -1-A, and
el 8.0 ft. to el. 5.0 Ft. NGVD west of SR A -1-A. Soils in this area can be described
as mostly fine grain sands, and fine grain sands with shell fragments (see Appendix
Section A, sheet A-3 - KSM sub -surface investigation). An existing conditions "Base
Map" has been prepared (see Appendix Section A, sheet A-4) for the project
service area, which depicts the lots, roads, driveways, existing water distribution
systems, topography, and soil boring locations.
Challenges and considerations for the construction of a sewer utility system for the
Summerplace service Area include:
- Geological considerations:
Soils in this area can be described as mostly fine grain sands, and fine grain sands
with shell fragments (see Appendix Section A, sheet A-3 — KSM Sub -surface
investigation). The groundwater table is within 3.5 ft. to 4.5 ft. of most areas (within
2 ft. at wet season). The project service area's relatively flat topography, sandy
soils and high groundwater tables compound the problems caused by septic
systems — the high groundwater table and sandy soils permit effluent to flow freely
and enter the groundwater without sufficient treatment, the high groundwater tables
limit absorption rates, causing effluent to surface above the drainfields where it can
further contaminate untreated stormwater run-off - which can discharge directly into
receiving waters and the Lagoon.
These same conditions can cause additional challenges during the construction of
utility systems. Deep installations will require temporary de -watering of rapid
draining soils — and as the depth of installation increases, the need and difficulty
increases for dewatering the excavation for the installation of the utility mains.
-Dewatering operations:
1. The majority of the project service area was developed in the 1950's to
1960's prior to the requirement for formal drainage systems. The service
area has little formal drainage and conveyance systems, and finding a
suitable location to discharge groundwater from de -watering operations will
be difficult.
2. Most homes in the project area have shallow wells (once used for
domestic water supply), but now used as an irrigation source. These wells
draw from the same shallow aquifer as the well points used in the
dewatering operations. There is a risk of impacting these wells during the
operations — wells may temporarily run dry, and salt water intrusion is a
concern in this area, which is located on the barrier island.
Page 5 of 25
/aG-7
-Existing narrow tree canopied streets:
Many streets in the Summerplace area are narrow with mature canopy trees and
vegetation within 5 to 10 feet of the edge of the road. There is a risk of damage to
vegetation during construction. Canopy trees may be damaged or lost due to the
utility main installation. The depth and location of installation of the sewer utility
main dictates the width of the excavation and extent of disturbance. Root and limb
pruning will be necessary in advance of and in preparation for construction.
-Existing potable water distribution system:
A public water distribution system lies along all the streets in the service area.
Installation of sewer utility mains within narrow streets with adjacent water mains
poses installation challenges. There is a risk of public hazard / damage to water
utility. The existing water distribution system generally lies on one side of the street,
and will dictate in many circumstances where the sewer utility main can be laid.
Local and state regulations typically require at least 6 to 10 ft. of horizontal
separation between the water and sewer mains, with exceptions permitting closer
conditions under certain special circumstances.
-Pavement surface:
A majority of the roads in the Summerplace area are unimproved shell roads.
These roads are relatively inexpensive to replace. However, there are several
roads, including Coco Plum Lane, Seagrape Drive, Frangipani Drive, Magnolia
Land and Azalea Lane which are paved. The cost to reconstruct paved roads can
be significant percentage of the entire project cost. The depth of the utility main and
placement of the main relative to the pavement will dictate extent of the road
reconstruction required.
- Storm related considerations:
During recent tropical storms and hurricanes (2004 / 2005), power was lost for
prolonged periods lasting as many as nine days. The Utilities Department has
over 250 lift stations throughout the County that rely on portable generators for
backup emergency power. The number of generators and crews needed to
service this number of sites is not available. As a result, sewage systems
backed up through several communities creating a public and environmental
health hazard over an extended number of days. The potential environmental
damage associated with a power outage and sewage overflowing into the streets
and draining into the Lagoon is contrary to the goal of this project. Consequently,
the implementation of any of the three system alternatives must include the cost to
provide reliable temporary emergency power.
-Corrosive environment:
The Summerplace service area is surrounded by the salt water and brackish water
environments of the Atlantic Ocean and Indian River Lagoon. Corrosion of
mechanical and electrical components can detrimentally affect a mechanical or
electrical systems reliability and long term operation and maintenance efforts and
costs. IRCDUS standards generally require the use of corrosion resistant materials.
However, even stainless steel, brass and aluminum components are adversely
affected by a salt environment. Therefore, consideration of the type, quantity, and
location of utility system components is important when evaluating the three system
alternatives.
Page 6 of 25
IV. Sewage System Alternative Analysis:
The implementation of three alternative replacement sewer collection systems
including a gravity collection system, a vacuum system, and a low pressure
system, was evaluated to determine which system is best suited to provide sewer
service for the Summerplace service area.
A. Replacement with Gravity collection system.
Primary considerations for incorporation of this system in the Summerplace service
area are:
1. Existing site conditions: topography, soils and groundwater table
2. Road damage and reconstruction requirements and costs: The depth of the
utility main and placement of the main relative to the pavement dictates the
extent of the road reconstruction required.
3. Discharge of groundwater from de -watering operations.
4. Impact to irrigation wells by de -watering operations.
5. Impact and disturbance to the neighborhood — road closures, dust and
noise, and damage or loss of street trees and vegetation.
6. Emergency backup power provisions.
7. Equipped with remote monitoring and controls.
8. Maintenance and operation requirements.
9. Reliability of system.
10. Construction installation costs.
System Description: Two separate sewer collection areas were implemented in the
conceptual design of the gravity collection system as a result of existing conditions and
design 1 construction restraints. The two system areas will provide sewer collection
capabilities for 269 households (See Appendix Section B, sheet B-5). These systems
are described as follows:
1. East of A -1-A (gravity): This area has approximately 110 residential home sites,
and includes all areas east of A -1-A and an additional small area west of A -1-A (West
Barefoot and West Shell Lanes). These areas are designed to drain to the south to an
existing lift station constructed near Wabasso Beach, on the east side of A -1-A,
approx. 100 If north of CR510. This existing lift station was designed and constructed
to accommodate this future service area. Gravity sewer mains and associated
manholes are routed down the center of the streets, generally draining south down A-
1 -A to the existing lift station. The existing lift station does not have emergency back-
up power. A diesel generator and automatic transfer switch will be installed to
increase this systems reliability. SBS has inspected the site of the existing lift station
and there appears to be ample space to place the diesel generator to the east of the
wet well (See Appendix Section E — Existing Lift Station at Wabasso Beach).
2. West of A -1-A (gravity): This area has approximately 159 residential home sites,
and includes all areas west of A -1-A, except for a small area at the southeast vicinity
(West Barefoot and West Shell Lanes). These areas are designed to drain to the west,
following the general topography of the project service area (slopes from east to west),
to a proposed public lift station at the western limits of the service area, within an
Page 7 of 25
I ZLt► • 9
existing IRC Drainage and Utility easement (OR Book 1994, P. 2396) at the western
extension of Coco Plum lane, west of Frangipani Drive. Gravity sewer mains and
associated manholes are routed down the center of the streets, generally draining from
east to west to the lift station. The lift station will transfer sewage to the County's
existing force main on CR510, which transfers sewage from most of the north barrier
island to a public regional lift station located on CR510 at Jungle trail, which transfers
the sewage to the wastewater treatment plant. Electric service for this system is
only required at the lift station. An emergency generator and automatic transfer switch
will be installed at the site to maintain operation during power outages.
Section B, Sheet B-1 depicts the cost breakdown used to estimate the cost of this
alternative. In order to develop the cost estimate for this alternative, the following
assumptions were made:
• 8 -inch diameter minimum sewer size
• 0.32% minimum design slope
• 3.5 feet cut at uppermost manhole
• Grade in the area is essentially flat
• Central master lift station owned and operated by IRCDUS. Pump station will be
primarily at grade and below ground, and will be fenced with landscaping provided
to decrease aesthetic impacts to adjacent properties. System components include
8' dia. concrete wet well, 2-10 HP sewage pumps, control panel, emergency
generator, and equipped with remote telemetry communication controls
• FPL installed overhead 480 volt 3 phase service, from CR510 to the lift station (cost
per FPL quote)
• Annual average daily wastewater flow estimated at 250 gpd per connection
• 4.0 -peak factor was used to estimate the design flow
• An average cost of $2250 per household is assumed to provide on-site septic
system abandonment and plumbing connection to the sewage collection system
• The cost includes 10% for contingencies and administrative costs
• The cost includes 7.5% for final engineering design and permitting costs
Discussion of Benefits and Disadvantaaes
A gravity collection system will eliminate potential for public and environmental health
issues associated with the poorly operating septic systems. The back-up power
available for this system is proven and provides great reliability, and ensures there will
be little or no environmental impact due to power outages and flooding that may be
caused by hurricane and tropical storm events.
A gravity sewage collection system has comparatively low maintenance since most
maintenance is limited to a single site (the lift station). System components have a life
expectancy of 10 to 30+ years (10 years for misc. parts and controllers, 15 for pumps,
20 for control panels, 30 + years for lift station wet wells and gravity mains).
The new gravity lines, initially installed to limit leaks, may experience increased
infiltration problems over time, but the pump station can be sized to handle the expected
Page 8 of 25
1a(.-10
peak conditions.
The primary concern associated with the implementation of a gravity sewer system in
the Summerplace service area is the anticipated impact and disturbance to the
neighborhoods during the construction of the system. When compared to the
construction of other sewer system alternatives, excavations are wider and deeper,
dewatering is necessary, and more road damage and reconstruction will be required,
and associated noise and dust will be worse. Anticipated impacts are:
- Roads will need to be reconstructed, and some driveways may need to be
reconstructed. Temporary road closures will be needed.
- Front yard and ROW Canopy trees and landscaping in the proximity of the
construction may be damaged and will need limbs and roots pruned in
advance of construction, and some tree / vegetation loss is inevitable.
- Translated vibration during reconstruction of the paved roads can damage
adjacent structures
- Existing wells may temporarily run dry due to dewatering activities, and salt
water intrusion into the shallow aquifer is possible.
- Construction noise and dust will be more prevalent. Noise and dust is
comparatively worse due to large equipment size needed for the deep
excavations, additional road construction/ paving equipment, and continuous
noise due to dewatering operations (24 hour a day pumping)
- Minor flooding conditions may be created during the work. The community has
very little formal drainage and stormwater conveyance systems, and finding a
suitable location to discharge groundwater from de -watering operations will be
difficult. Minor flooding of roads, roadside swales and undeveloped lots may be
necessary to facilitate the required dewatering activities.
The gravity sewer system construction costs are relatively expensive due to the
need for a central public lift station with back-up power (diesel generator and A.T.S.),
and costs are further increased due to construction conditions in the Summerplace
service area. The project service area's relatively flat topography, sandy soils and high
groundwater table presents challenges during the construction of utility systems. Deep
installations associated with these gravity systems will require temporary de -watering
of rapid draining soils — and as the depth of installation increases, the need, difficulty
and cost increases. Other challenges that impact costs include restricted ROW widths,
existing landscape / vegetation in ROW, and existing streets and driveways that will
necessarily need to be re -constructed and re -paved.
- Likely Total Cost Gravity Collection System:
• $ 3,049,250.56 = $11,335.50 per home site (269 homes)
- Impact and Connection Fees:
• $2,846.00 per home site
Page 9 of 25
B. Replacement with Vacuum System:
Primary considerations for incorporation of this system in the Summerplace service
area are:
1. Existing site conditions: topography, soils and groundwater table
2. Existing Utilities: water main and electrical service lines on side of road, in
vicinity of proposed vacuum main route. There is a risk of public hazard if the
water main is damaged during construction.
3. Road ROW and street tree disturbance. The depth of the utility main and
placement of the main relative to pavement and vegetation dictates the extent
of disturbance. Many streets are narrow with mature canopy trees and
vegetation within 5 to 10 feet of the edge of the road.
4. Dewatering requirements.
5. Impact and disturbance to the neighborhood — road closures, dust and noise,
and damage or loss of street trees and vegetation.
6. Emergency backup power provisions.
7. Equipped for remote monitoring and controls.
8. Maintenance and operation requirements.
9. Reliability of system.
10. Construction installation costs.
System Description — Two separate sewer collection areas were implemented in the
conceptual design of the vacuum system as a result of existing conditions and design /
construction restraints (See Appendix Section C, sheet C-6). The system should be
considered a hybrid system, since a vacuum system would be used for 217 units, and a
gravity sewer system would be used for 52 units. The two system areas are:
1. South East sub area (gravity): This area has 52 residential home sites. Due to the
geometric lay -out and lack of utility easements, it is not as feasible to extend
vacuum lines as it is to extend gravity lines to this small sub area located in the
south east of the project's service area. Existing nearby gravity sewer
infrastructure makes the extension of the gravity sewer system to this sub area
much more economical. Therefore this sub area is not included within the sub
area served by the vacuum system, but will be served by a gravity sewer
collection system. This sub area includes three cul-de-sacs: one street east of A-
1 -A (East Barefoot Place), and two streets west of A -1-A (West Barefoot and West
Shell Lanes). The systems are designed to drain to the south to an existing lift
station constructed near Wabasso Beach, on the east side of A -1-A. This existing
lift station was designed and constructed to accommodate this future service area.
The existing lift station does not have emergency back-up power. A diesel
generator and automatic transfer switch will be installed to increase this systems
reliability. SBS has inspected the site of the existing lift station and there appears
to be ample space to place the diesel generator to the east of the wet well (See
Appendix Section E — Existing Lift Station at Wabasso Beach).
2. Vacuum system sub area (Vacuum): This area has 217 residential home sites,
and includes all areas west of A -1-A, except for a small area at the southeast
vicinity (West Barefoot and West Shell Lanes); and serves all areas east of A -1-A,
Page 10 of 25
I a& - I ;L
except a small area on the south end (east Barefoot Lane).This area is designed
for sewage collection via a vacuum collection system, which entails connection
of each house service to a dedicated collection chamber from which a vacuum
system transfers the collected sewage to a central location via vacuum. A layout
of the system is shown in Section C, sheet C-6. Similar to the gravity flow
system, electric service is only required at the central vacuum station.
The conceptual design of the vacuum system is based on providing one (1)
collection chamber for two (2) homes wherever possible. It is assumed the
collection chambers would be located in the road ROW along the front property
lines at adjoining lot corners. Each home would connect to the chamber with a 6 -
inch PVC (SDR 35) service. This service will run from the existing house sewer
connection, near the existing septic tank, to the new collection chambers. These
6 -inch services provide system storage, in addition to the storage in the
collection chambers.
The vacuum system will consist of 4" through 8" PVC (SDR 21) pipe laid in a
saw- tooth pattern down the side of the streets (opposite of the water mains),
generally draining from east to west to a single vacuum pump station, located at
the western limits of the service area, within an existing IRC Drainage and Utility
easement (OR Book 1994, P.2396). The easement is at the western extension of
Coco Plum Lane, west of Frangipani Drive. The vacuum station will transfer
sewage to the County's existing force main on CR510, which transfers sewage
from most of the north barrier island to a regional pump station located on CR510
at Jungle trail, which transfers the sewage to the wastewater treatment plant.
The station includes the vacuum pumps, chamber, and sewage pumps for
transfer via force main to a connection point to the existing IRCDUS public
sewer system. An emergency generator and automatic transfer switch will be
installed at the site to maintain operation during power outages. The station is
equipped with telemetry communication control so the operation can be
monitored and controlled remotely by IRCDUS. A bio -filter will be installed with
the vacuum station to minimize odors through the system vent. The station will be
housed above ground to avoid problems during flooding, and the structure can be
designed to look like a residential structure to minimize the aesthetic impact of the
utility on the neighborhood.
Section C, sheet C-1 depicts the cost breakdown used to estimate the cost of this
alternative. In order to develop the cost estimate for this alternative, the following
assumptions were made:
• 6 -inch diameter plumbing service connection from each home to the collection
chamber
• One collection chamber for every two homes (90 % of homes), and one collection
chamber for each home (10% of the homes)
• Grade in the area is essentially flat
• Central Vacuum Pump station owned and operated by IRCDUS. Pump station will
be housed in a residential looking building, and landscaping will be provided to
decrease aesthetic impacts to adjacent properties. System components include 2 —
10 HP vacuum pumps, 1500 gal collection tank, 2-10 HP sewage pumps, control
Page 11 of 25
laL •13
panel, emergency generator, and bio -mass filter bed, and equipped with remote
telemetry communication controls
• FPL installed overhead 480 volt 3 phase service, from CR510 to the vacuum pump
station. (cost per FPL quote)
• Annual average daily wastewater flow estimated at 250 gpd per connection
• 4.0 -peak factor was used to estimate the design flow
• An average cost of $2250 per household is assumed to provide on-site septic
system abandonment and plumbing connection to the sewage collection system
• The cost includes 10% for contingencies and administrative costs
• The cost includes 7.5% for final engineering design and permitting costs
Discussion of Benefits and Disadvantages
A vacuum system will eliminate potential for public and environmental health issues
associated with poorly operating septic systems. Like the gravity sewer system, there is
a need for only one electric service and therefore exposure to possible power problems
is limited. The back-up power available for this system is proven and provides great
reliability, and ensures there will be little or no environmental impact due to power outages
and flooding that may be caused by hurricane and tropical storm events. The system
should be watertight since it must maintain an active vacuum. This should make the
system sound during flood conditions.
A vacuum system has low maintenance requirements. IRCDUS recently installed (2007/
2008) and operates an AIRVAC vacuum system in the Rockridge community. This system
replaced a low-pressure system. IRC staff interviewed by SBS in November 2013 indicated
that after 5 years of operation, the vacuum system was much more reliable than the
previous low pressure system. Maintenance, while requiring a little more effort than a
gravity system, is routine and not demanding, and MUCH less than the low pressure
system it replaced. In addition, system operations have been with -out incident since start
up. Staff indicated that the typical maintenance requirements (above that of a gravity
system) at the vacuum pump station and the valve pit assemblies at each home includes:
-Vacuum station: check oil in vacuum pumps and drain condensation daily. Change oil
every 500 hrs., and change exhaust filters annually.
-Valve Pits: check vacuum valves/ reset timing, as needed. Pressure monitoring at vacuum
station will indicate if there is a faulty valve in the system.
IRC staff did not know the estimated hours of maintenance required on an annual basis.
However, AIRVAC, a supplier of Vacuum systems, estimated the annual man-hours for
maintenance and operation of a vacuum system at Summerplace to be approximately 551
manhours per year. AIRVAC also estimates that the system components have a life
expectancy of 10 to 30+ years (10 for misc. parts and controllers, 15 for vacuum valves
and pumps, 20 for control panels, 30 years for collection tank, and 30+ years for vacuum
mains).
A vacuum system is designed to be water tight to carry a vacuum. However, if a leak
were to occur, it can be troublesome to detect where the leak is located. Therefore, a
properly designed system must include isolation valves to aid in detecting leak locations.
IRC staff has indicated that in its 5 years of operation at Rockridge, there were no leaks
within the vacuum mains and only a couple found in the vacuum pits due to "hung valves".
Page 12 of 25
)a& •14
At each occurrence, these were detected and fixed within an hour.
Other conditions unique to the vacuum system are:
- A vacuum system has high velocity sewage flow, which minimizes settlement
of solids and potential for clogging.
- Vacuum systems have less storage volume compared to a typical lift station.
Therefore, the system will run more often than a lift station, creating the
potential for more noise and potential odor problems. Consideration should be
given to the design of an enclosed pump station building and odor control.
- Vacuum systems have 4 pumps (2 vacuum and 2 sewage), while a typical
gravity sewer lift station only has 2 sewage pumps; and due to limited storage
volumes, the vacuum sewage pumps will run longer. Therefore its electrical
cost will be greater.
- Home sites will require a valve pit and vent stack located in the road ROW at
the front lot corner.
The construction of a vacuum sewer system in the Summerplace service area is
anticipated to have less of an impact and disturbance to the neighborhoods than the
gravity sewer system. The system design attributes — small diameter vacuum mains which
are flat lying, require relatively shallow installation depth and narrow trench width - permit
the construction of the mains with minimal impact and disturbance to the adjacent streets,
infrastructure and vegetation, and will not require dewatering activities.
- Vacuum mains will typically be installed in the road side grass areas, with
minimal disturbance to the roads. Where mains need to cross paved roads or
improved driveways, damage is avoided via use of boring techniques easily
implemented with the small diameter mains installed. Temporary road closures
will typically not be required.
- A public water distribution system lies along all the streets in the service area.
Installation of vacuum sewer utility mains within narrow streets with adjacent
water mains poses installation challenges. There is a risk of public hazard if the
water main is damaged during construction. The existing water distribution
system generally lies on one side of the street, and will dictate in many
circumstances where the vacuum sewer utility main can be laid. (generally, on
the opposite side of the road).
- Due to the installation of the mains on the side of the roads, front yard and
ROW Canopy trees and landscaping could be damaged and preventative limb
and root pruning will be necessary, and some tree / vegetation loss is
inevitable. However, the small diameter mains can be easily routed around
specimen trees or bored beneath the root structure, and losses can be reduced.
- Compaction efforts in road side excavations is via small equipment. Translated
vibration is NOT expected to impact adjacent structures.
- Dewatering is not anticipated on the majority of the installation. — impacts to
wells and the aquifer or surface drainage systems is not expected.
- Construction noise and dust is expected on any construction project, but will be
much less than that anticipated for a gravity system installation.
A vacuum system will have a high upfront cost due to the high cost of the collection
chambers and the vacuum / pump station. To reduce upfront costs, the installation of the
collection chambers can be deferred until each household is ready to connect. However,
because this project is proposed as a retro fit / replacement for private septic systems in a
developed service area for environmental reasons, the deferral of the collection chambers
Page 13 of 25
1'.\(,- IS
for each household will not provide the immediate environmental benefit required for this
project. Therefore, for this project, the assumption is that the costs for the collection
chamber installation to serve each home are a necessary up front task and cost.
The vacuum systems construction costs are dramatically impacted by the cost of the
vacuum pump station, which is typically housed in a building to contain noise and control
odor. Costs are also increased to make the station compatible with the neighborhood — it is
recommended that the pump housing / structure is designed to look like a residential
structure, and the site should also be landscape to match the residential character of the
neighborhood. Other vacuum sewer system construction costs are relatively in -expensive
— the small diameter vacuum mains installed on the road side can avoid disturbance of
paved roads and driveways, and costs are lower relative to a gravity sewer main and
manholes. However, other challenges that could impact costs include restricted ROW
widths, and existing landscape / vegetation in ROW.
- Likely Total Cost — Hybrid Vacuum / Gravity System
• $3,450,587.26 = $12,827.46 per home site {269 homes}
- Impact and Connection Fees
• $2,846.00 per home site
Page 14 of 25
1 aG'14
C. Replacement with Low Pressure System:
Primary considerations for incorporation of this system in the SummerPlace service area
are:
1. Existing site conditions: topography, soils and groundwater table
2. Existing Utilities: water main and electrical service lines on side of road, in
vicinity of proposed vacuum main route. There is a risk of public hazard if the
water main is damaged during construction.
3. Road ROW and street tree disturbance. The depth of the utility main and
placement of the main relative to pavement and vegetation dictates the extent
of disturbance. Many streets are narrow with mature canopy trees and
vegetation within 5 to 10 feet of the edge of the road.
4. Dewatering requirements.
5. Impact and disturbance to the neighborhood — road closures, dust and noise,
and damage or loss of street trees and vegetation.
6. Emergency backup power provisions.
7. Equipped with audible and visual alarm.
8. Maintenance and operation requirements.
9. Corrosive environmental conditions.
10. Reliability of system.
11. Construction installation costs.
System Description — Two separate sewer collection areas were implemented in the
conceptual design and analysis of the low pressure system as a result of existing
conditions and design 1 construction restraints. The two system areas will provide sewer
collection capabilities for 269 households (see Appendix Section D, sheet D-5). The
system should be considered a hybrid system, since a low pressure system would be used
for 217 units, and a gravity sewer system would be used for 52 units. The two system
areas are:
1. South East sub area (gravity): This area has 52 residential home sites. Due to
the geometric lay -out and lack of utility easements, it is not as feasible to
extend low pressure mains as it is to extend gravity lines to this small sub area
located in the south east of the project's service area. Existing nearby gravity
sewer infrastructure makes the extension of the gravity sewer system to this
sub area much more economical. Therefore this sub area is not included
within the sub area served by the low pressure system, but will be served by a
gravity sewer collection system. This sub area includes three cul-de-sacs: one
street east of A -1-A (East Barefoot Place), and two streets west of A -1-A
(West Barefoot and West Shell Lanes). The systems are designed to drain to
the south to an existing lift station constructed near Wabasso Beach, on the
east side of A -1-A. This existing lift station was designed and constructed to
accommodate this future service area. The existing lift station does not have
emergency back-up power. A diesel generator and automatic transfer switch
will be installed to increase this systems reliability. SBS has inspected the site
of the existing lift station and there appears to be ample space to place the
diesel generator to the east of the wet well (See Appendix Section E — Existing
Lift Station at Wabasso Beach).
Page 15 of 25
1 aG •1-
2. Low pressure system sub area (low pressure): This area has 217 residential
home sites, and includes all areas west of A -1-A, except for a small area at the
southeast vicinity (West Barefoot and West Shell Lanes); and serves all areas
east of A -1-A, except a small area on the south end (east Barefoot Lane).This
area is designed for sewage collection via low pressure system, which entails
the connection of each house to a grinder pump station (typically one or two
homes per station). The sewage is pumped out of the wet well and into an
adjacent low pressure small diameter sewer force main system (typically 4"
diameter) which is generally routed along the side of the street and connects
to and discharges into the existing centralized sewer transmission force mains
located on Cr510 and SR A -1-A.
The conceptual design of the low pressure system is based on providing one
(1) duplex (two pump) grinder pump station for two (2) homes wherever possible,
and one simplex (one pump) grinder station for single homes where required. It is
assumed the pump stations would be located in the road ROW for the smaller
simplex system, and within a front yard easement (approx. 5' x 10') for the larger
duplex system — located along the front property lines at adjoining lot corners.
Each home would connect to pump station with a 4 inch or 6 -inch PVC (SDR
35) service. This service will run from the existing house sewer connection, near
the existing septic tank, to the pump station. The system operates as follows: The
liquid level triggers the pump in the wet well to operate, and the sewage is
pumped out of the wet well and into the low pressure force main system. The low
pressure system consists of 4" C900 PVC pipe laid along the side of the
streets (opposite of the water mains). These low pressure mains connect to and
discharge into existing IRCDUS force mains located in CR510 and SR A -1-A.
A power distribution system is provided for this sewage collection system with
emergency backup provisions to accommodate potential power outages (i.e. during
a Hurricane) (see Appendix Section D, sheet D-6). It is proposed under this
alternative to secure up to three sites to locate ATS and generator equipment.
The three sites must be located to minimize the distance from the generator to
each of the individual distribution panels. Three dedicated automatic transfer
switch (ATS) stations are provided with permanent diesel generators to provide
centralized power for the system. The ATS stations will receive high voltage (480
volt) power from the power company from the existing overhead distribution
system. Upon loss of normal power, the ATS will automatically start the generator
and then switchover to emergency power to keep all stations fully operational
during the power outage. The three (3) ATS stations will feed 15 electrical
distribution panels located through -out the service area. Each distribution panel will
provide electrical service to the simplex and duplex home site pump stations.
Underground power is to be installed largely along proposed low pressure force
main routes or within other utility easements from the three ATS stations, to the
15 distribution panels, to the home site pump stations.
Section D, sheet D-5 depicts the proposed low pressure force main system, and
Section D, sheet D-6 depicts the Electrical distribution system lay -out
Section D, sheet D-1 depicts the cost breakdown used to estimate the cost of this
alternative. In order to develop the cost estimate for this alternative, the following
Page 16 of 25
t�.4�f8
assumptions were made:
• 4 or 6 -inch diameter service connection per home
• One duplex grinder pump station (2-2 HP 3 PH 460 volt grinder pumps, 48" x 6 ft. well,
30"x40" valve vault) with audible and visual alarm for every two homes (90 % of
homes)
• One simplex grinder pump station (1-2 HP 3 PH 460 volt grinder pump, with 30" x 5 ft.
well with all valves / control in well) with audible and visual alarm for single home sites
where required (10% of the homes).
• Grade in the area is essentially flat
• Annual average daily wastewater flow estimated as 250 gpd per connection
• 4.0 -peak factor was used to estimate the design flow
• Central electrical distribution system with three main electrical distribution panels
with Automatic Transfer Stations for emergency power by permanent generators.
• FPL installed overhead 480 volt 3 phase service, from CR510 and SR A-1 -A to the
three (3) main control panel / ATS stations (cost per FPL quote)
• An average cost of $2250 per household is assumed to provide on-site septic
system abandonment and plumbing connection to the sewage collection system.
• The cost includes 10% for contingencies and administrative costs.
• The cost includes 7.5% for final engineering design and permitting costs.
Discussion of Benefits and Disadvantages
A low pressure system can minimize the potential for public and environmental health
issues associated with poorly operating septic systems. However, unlike a gravity or
vacuum sewer system, there is a need for multiple electric service connections to run
numerous individual grinder pump stations. Therefore exposure to possible power
interruption or other mechanical or electrical failures is a significant concern. In order to
minimize the likelihood of a disruption of electrical service, a common master electrical
distribution system with emergency backup power is necessary to provide reliable
operation in emergency situations. If the low pressure system is not in operation for more
than 24 hours, the home site pump stations will likely back up, creating an immediate
public and environmental health hazard, and potential environmental damage associated
with sewage overflowing into the streets and draining into the Lagoon. This possibility is
contrary to the environmental goals for this project. Consequently, the implementation of
this system must include emergency operation measures; and unlike the gravity and
vacuum systems, due to the decentralized electrical requirements of numerous home site
pump stations, providing only one electric service location is not practical or feasible.
Therefore, a power distribution system is proposed to provide the emergency operations
capabilities required of this project. However, this power distribution system, including
three main electric service and distribution panel locations and fifteen distribution panels
and the associated underground conduits and wiring will be expensive and makes this
system less feasible then the others.
The low pressure system is the least reliable system, and will require substantial weekly,
monthly and annual maintenance to the many individual pump stations. Low pressure
systems have many electrical panels, pump stations, and mechanical and electrical
components — located at each home site, and additional common electrical equipment
within the service area. It is estimated that the Summerplace system would need 119
pump stations (98 duplex and 21 simplex), with 217 pumps, 119 electrical panels, 15
electrical distribution system sub panels, 3 master distribution system electrical panels with
Page 17 of 25
3 ATS stations and 3 diesel generators. Chances for failure are greater with many system
components. Further, the Summerplace service area is located on the barrier island in a
corrosive environment within flood prone areas — the likelihood of these many components
having intermittent failures is more likely. (It is worthy to note that IRCDUS replaced a low
pressure system at Rockridge community in 2007 / 2008 with a Vacuum system due to
reliability concerns and significant failures causing environmental damages during the
2004 hurricane events).
A low pressure system will likely have the most laborious maintenance requirements.
IRCDUS currently has a low pressure system which has been in operation for 15+ years in
the River Lake Estates/Oak Island Subdivisions, located north of 73rd Street, east of U.S.
Highway 1.IRC staff interviewed by SBS in October 2013 indicated the system has had
many maintenance and operation challenges through the years. Staff indicated that the
typical maintenance requirements for a low pressure system included:
- Check wet well at each home annually — check seals, clean. (water/ hose bib connection
from home owner)
-Check control panels annually — clean, tighten and replace corroded parts
-Check pump operation at each every home annually.
-Service calls — 3 to 4 per month for 76 +- homes. (9 to 12 per month equivalent at
Summerplace))
IRC staff did not know the estimated hours of maintenance required on an annual basis.
The system components have a life expectancy of 10 to 30+ years (10 for misc. parts and
controllers, 15 for pumps, 20 for control panels, 20 for fiberglass wet wells, and 30+ years
for low pressure force mains).
A low pressure system is designed to be water tight. Force mains are designed,
constructed and tested to the same standards as a water main — to hold up to 200 psi. A
properly designed system should include isolation valves to aid in detecting leak locations
and shutting down a section of main to permit maintenance.
Other conditions unique to the low pressure system are:
- A low pressure force main system can have intermittent flow conditions (no
flow, to flows reaching 5 fps). Settlement of solids can occur, and there is the
potential for constricting pipe flow, causing higher pressure conditions and more
strain on the small grinder pumps.
- Low pressure systems rely on small wet wells at each home site. The wet wells
generally have minimal extra storage volume. Any electrical or mechanical
failure can result in the wet well overflowing in yards and streets, or backing up
sewage into the home within 12 to 24 hours. These systems are NOT
monitored by IRCDUS telemetry systems (not practical or feasible), and the
failure can easily go un -noticed. An audible alarm and visual beacon can be
placed at the control panels — but can go un -noticed if no one is present.
- The low pressure systems typical incorporates small grinder lift stations, with 1
pump for single home site applications, and dual pumps when serving 2 home
sites. The number of pumps for Summerplace service area is likely to require
217 pumps. The electrical cost associated with running all these pumps with a
common electrical distribution system will cost far greater than either a vacuum
or gravity system.
- Additional utility easements may be needed from home owners: one duplex
Page 18 of 25
Ia.`•ao
(two pump) grinder pump station is proposed for two (2) homes wherever
possible, and one simplex (one pump) grinder station for single homes where
required. It is assumed the pump stations would be located in the road ROW for
the smaller simplex system, and within a front yard easement (approx. 5' x 10')
for the larger duplex system — located along the front property lines at adjoining
lot corners.
The construction of a low pressure sewer system in the Summerplace service area is
anticipated to have less of an impact and disturbance to the neighborhoods than the
gravity sewer system, and a similar impact as that caused by the vacuum system. The
system design attributes — small diameter force mains which are flat lying, require relatively
shallow installation depth and narrow trench width - permit the construction of the mains
with minimal impact and disturbance to the adjacent streets, infrastructure and vegetation,
and will not require dewatering activities.
- Force mains will typically be installed in the road side grass areas, with minimal
disturbance to the roads. Where mains need to cross paved roads or improved
driveways, damage is avoided via use of boring techniques easily implemented
with the small diameter mains installed. Temporary road closures will typically
not be required.
- A public water distribution system lies along all the streets in the service area.
Installation of force mains within narrow streets with adjacent water mains
poses installation challenges. There is a risk of public hazard if the water main
is damaged during construction. The existing water distribution system
generally lies on one side of the street, and will dictate in many circumstances
where the force main can be laid (generally, on the opposite side of the road).
- Due to the installation of the mains on the side of the roads, front yard and
ROW Canopy trees and landscaping could be damaged and preventative limb
and root pruning will be necessary, and some tree / vegetation loss is
inevitable. However, the small diameter mains can be easily routed around
specimen trees or bored beneath the root structure, and losses can be reduced.
- Compaction efforts in road side excavations are via small equipment.
Translated vibration is NOT expected to impact adjacent structures.
- Dewatering is not anticipated on the majority of the installation. — impacts to
wells and the aquifer or surface drainage systems is not expected.
- Construction noise and dust is expected on any construction project, but will be
much less than that anticipated for a gravity system installation.
- Lift stations will be required at front lot lines. Duplex stations will require a front
yard easement (5'x10'). The excavation for this installation may impact home
site landscaping.
Low pressure sewer systems were developed initially as a low cost alternative to a
conventional gravity sewer system. The primary savings is in the low 'up front' costs
associated with the construction of small diameter pressure mains in lieu of the 8" gravity
sewer mains, and because the grinder pump station costs can be deferred until
construction of homes progresses. However, because this project is proposed as a retrofit
/ replacement for private septic systems in a developed service area for environmental
reasons, the deferral of the pump station construction at each home does not provide the
immediate environmental benefit required for this project. Therefore, for this project, the
assumption is that the cost for the pump station installation to serve each home is a
necessary up front task and cost.
Page 19 of 25
I ZG -Q.1
The low pressure systems construction costs are dramatically impacted by the cost of the
individual lift stations necessary at each home site and the cost of the common master
electrical distribution system needed to provide a system with a reliability closer to that
offered by the gravity or vacuum systems, and one that is necessary in order to realize the
environmental benefits required for this project. Other low pressure system construction
costs are relatively in -expensive — the small diameter force mains installed on the road
side avoid disturbance of paved roads and driveways, and help reduce costs relative to a
gravity sewer main and manholes. However, other challenges that could impact costs
include restricted ROW widths, and existing landscape/ vegetation in ROW.
- Likely Total Cost — Hybrid Low Pressure / Gravity System
0 $6,005,592.32 = $22,325.62 per home site (269 homes)
- Impact and Connection Fees
• $2,846.00 per home site
Page 20 of 25
V. Recommendations:
Summary:
Construction costs are one of many parameters that are considered when evaluating and
recommending a sewer system to serve the Summerplace service area. Favorable
consideration has been given to the system that will provide environmental benefits to the
lagoon, provide reliable continuous operation (i.e. during prolonged storm induced power
outages), minimize impacts and disturbance to the neighborhoods, and minimize
maintenance requirements to the utility.
Construction Costs: In order to provide a sewer system that meets the goals of this project
- to eliminate the detrimental impacts to the lagoon caused by septic systems, and to
reduce the risk of any system failures that would also cause immeasurable harm to the
environment - costs for the three respective systems included design specifications that
would meet these goals. This meant that systems would not be piecemealed but would be
constructed in a single phase as a complete functional system - connecting every home
within the service area. In addition, systems would need to be monitored and / or alarmed,
and systems would require back up / emergency power supply. Providing these necessary
features has increased the cost for all three systems. The system costs, in order of least
costly to most costly, are as follows:
-1. Gravity sewer system: $ 3,049,250.56
-2. Hybrid Vacuum/Gravity System: $3,450,587.26
-3. Hybrid Low Pressure/Gravity System: $6,005,592.32
Environmental benefits: it is clear that both the gravity and vacuum systems will effectively
eliminate almost any possible environmental damage that is caused by existing septic
systems and has the least risk associated with potential accidents / failures of the
implementation of each respective system. In contrast, the low pressure system is not as
simple or as reliable as these systems — it has many characteristics that contribute to its
unreliability and vulnerability for failure, including: numerous electrical and mechanical
system parts and components, most of which are decentralized; increased vulnerability to
environment (salt air, flooding); limited monitoring capabilities; limited storage capacity.
Impacts and disturbance to the neighborhoods: The gravity system will have the greatest
impact and disturbance on the neighborhood. Short term impacts include: road closures
and landscape damage caused by sewer main installation; continuous noise, potential
minor flooding and irrigation well failures from de -watering operations; excessive dust,
vibration and noise due to road reconstruction. Long term impacts could include translated
vibratory compaction damage to structures, salt water intrusion in the shallow aquifer; and
loss of specimen canopy trees. Vacuum and low pressure systems, like any construction
within an established community, will cause disturbances to the neighborhoods. However,
paved streets and improved driveways are not anticipated to be damaged and in need of
reconstruction, and there will be little need for de -watering operations. Therefore, the
construction is anticipated to create much less disturbance to the neighborhood, and will
be of a shorter duration, with less intense noise and dust, and little if any vibration.
Page 21 of 25
IAt.-
Maintenance requirements to the utility: It is clear that the gravity system has the least
maintenance and long term operation requirements, and will be the most cost effective to
operate. This is the standard system used in the majority of development projects in IRC,
and IRCDUS is adept at and experienced in the maintenance and long term operation of
these systems. The vacuum system requires similar, but a little more maintenance and will
cost a little more to operate due to maintenance time (man-hours) and electrical costs (for
pump station). Major components that require additional efforts are the central vacuum
pump station, which has an additional two vacuum pumps, and the valve pits at each home
site, which require inspections and adjustments on occasion. IRC personal interviewed for
this project, which operates and maintains the vacuum system in the Rockridge
community, has indicated that the system in Rockridge has run very efficiently and without
problems for five years. (Note: This system was a replacement for an inefficient and
unreliable low pressure system). In contrast, the low pressure systems require a significant
amount of maintenance — and it is estimated that 9 to 12 service calls would be made per
month.
Conclusion:
The low pressure system does not provide the reliability needed to meet the goals of this
project, and in an attempt to design this system with the goals of this project in mind, the
costs for a low pressure system are uneconomical. Therefore, the low pressure system
should not be considered for implementation for Summerplace.
Both the gravity sewer system and the vacuum systems meet the environmental goals for
this project. Construction costs are within 12% of each other, and actual bid costs may
fluctuate as much as 20% from this estimate, and may fluctuate as much as 20% from high
to low bidder on either system when final design and permitting is completed and it is bid
publicly. Based on the construction costs alone, there is not a clear favorite.
Summerplace area is a unique residential community with many narrow unpaved lanes
with large oak tree and cabbage palm canopy covering the right of way, and native
vegetation preserved throughout the community. Many of its homes were built in the
1960's and 1970's, and at least '/2 prior to 1983. Most homes depend on the shallow
aquifer for irrigation, and have structure and foundation systems that would not meet
current building codes. While unique, in some respects, the community is frail. The vacuum
system is anticipated to have the least impact and disturbance to this community — and
should leave it intact and without permanent damage. Its operation costs are not much
higher than the gravity system costs, and IRCDUS experience with the Rockridge
community's vacuum system is favorable. Therefore, after consideration of the vacuum
sewer systems construction costs, environmental benefits to the lagoon, reliability,
impacts and disturbance to the neighborhood, and maintenance requirements to the
utility, this system is recommended for implementation to provide sewer collection
for the Summerplace service area.
Page 22 of 25
lIaLto •-Z14
Post Script
"Septic Tank and Effluent Pump" (STEP) system
After SBS was given notice to proceed with the above study, discussions involving the
implementation of a "Septic Tank and Effluent Pump" (STEP) system in certain areas
within IRC and the City of Vero Beach were started — both in public forums and reported in
local news. While a full analysis of the implementation of this system is not within the
scope of this study, SBS has prepared the following limited narrative of the system
description, and its advantages and disadvantages.
The STEP system is very similar to a low pressure system. The significant difference is
that a STEP system incorporates an on-site septic tank (called an interceptor tank) to
capture most grit, grease and troublesome solids, and retains the sludge and floatable
matter, and discharges a liquid effluent. (At this point the system is almost identical to a
low pressure system, except that effluent pumps (smaller HP rating) are used in lieu of
grinder pumps). A small lift station with an effluent pump (typically 1/3 hp to 3/4 hp) is
placed near the interceptor tank to receive the effluent. The liquid level triggers the pump in
the wet well to operate, and the effluent is pumped out of the wet well and into an adjacent
low pressure small diameter sewer force main system, which is generally routed along the
side of the street. These low pressure mains typically connect to and discharge into the
public utility infrastructure: either an existing nearby gravity sewer collection system or
existing nearby centralized sewer transmission force main.
Advantages of a STEP system over a low pressure system are:
-due to the solids removal, less expensive effluent pumps may be used in the wet well.
-due to the removal of solids, the low pressure force mains are carrying less sewage, and
do not have to pass solids that could settle and clog pipes. Consequently, force main size
may be reduced. It is common to use 1 '/z to 2'/z inch mains for effluent transmission.
Claims that implementation of a STEP system may reduce costs dramatically and make
connection affordable to residents may be an over promising panacea. This system may
not be feasible or viable. The STEP system has most of the same characteristics of a low
pressure system that make it unviable for this project. To summarize:
The small lift stations typically are provided with a small effluent pump (typically 1/3
hp to 1/2 hp). These "low pressure" pumps have limited capacity, and may struggle
to push against the utility systems force mains without another re -pumping/ booster
pump station available for this purpose at an additional expense.
Low pressure STEP systems rely on small wet wells at each home site. These wet
wells generally have minimal extra storage volume. Any electrical or mechanical
failure can result in the wet well overflowing in yards and streets, or backing up
sewage into the home within 12 to 24 hours. These systems are NOT monitored by
IRCDUS telemetry systems (not practical or feasible), and the failure can easily go
un -noticed. An audible alarm and visual beacon can be placed at the control panels
— but can go un -noticed if no one is present.
The low pressure STEP systems typical incorporate small pump stations, with 1
pump for each home site application. The number of pumps for Summerplace
Page 23 of 25
I�G•�S
service area is likely to be 217. The electrical cost associated with running all these
pumps is expensive. It is estimated that the Summerplace system would need 217
pump stations with 217 pumps and electrical panels. Chances for failure are
greater with many system components. Further, the Summerplace service area is
located on the barrier island in a corrosive environment within flood prone areas —
and the likelihood of these many components having intermittent failures is more
likely. The maintenance and operation costs, similar to a low pressure system, will
be significant.
Claims that existing septic tanks located in the yards of the existing home sites can
be incorporated in a new STEP system (at a substantial cost savings) is likely
inaccurate. The majority of homes in Summerplace were built prior to 1983, when
Septic system regulations were modernized. Most pre 1983 septic tanks are 750 or
900 gallons, may leak and may be structurally unsound. EPA "Manual on
Alternative Wastewater Collection Systems", document no. EPA/625/1-91/024,
indicates that existing septic tanks are rarely able to be used in new STEP
systems, and that 100 % replacement is common. For STEP systems, the EPA
recommends that the interceptor (septic) tanks are at least 1000 gallons to serve
one residential home, completely leak proof, without outside / illegal inflow sources
(roof or yard drainage), and are structurally sound. The tanks also must have
inflow, outflow and pump operating elevations with baffles set at predetermined
elevations to ensure sludge, scum and clear zones are appropriately set relative to
inflow and outflow elevations. These requirements make it necessary to excavate,
test, and modify the existing tanks, which is typically prohibitively expensive.
Consequently the tanks are usually replaced or abandoned and replaced with new
tanks.
Emergency backup power is not easily provided for this type of system in the case
of power outages (i.e. during a Hurricane) because all power needs are de-
centralized, and power is required at each individual pump station. Due to the
decentralized electrical requirements of numerous home site pump stations,
providing a central power distribution system is an expensive but necessary
requirement. A power distribution system, similar to the one proposed for the low
pressure system can be constructed to provide the emergency operations
capabilities required of this project. However, this electrical system will be
expensive and may make this system less feasible then the others.
Based on the above information, it can be inferred that the STEP system may not be
the most appropriate system for the Summerplace service area. It has all the
shortcomings that a low pressure system has, including: numerous electrical and
mechanical system parts and components, most of which are decentralized; increased
vulnerability to environment (salt air, flooding); limited monitoring capabilities; limited
storage capacity. In addition, this system will require the added expense of a new
interceptor (septic) tank at each home, as well as the usual maintenance and "pump -
out" requirements of a septic system.
Page 24 of 25
I U • a.4
The success of this project relies generally on the public's acceptance and specifically on
the Summerplace service areas residents' acceptance. The public users must be
satisfied that the Indian River County Utilities Department has explored various financial
alternatives and selects a system that will meet its goals, including: provide environmental
benefits to the lagoon, provide reliable continuous operation, minimize impacts and
disturbance to the neighborhoods, minimize maintenance requirements to the utility, and
will be economical to install. Public acceptance of the project can be expected if the users
accept the facts as follows: the project is needed; the best alternative is selected in order
to execute the project; and the selected financial plan will result in the users' acceptance of
their share of the project's cost.
This sanitary sewer project not only benefits the local users but also benefits the
community due to environmental considerations. The elimination of pollution from septic
disposal systems greatly benefits the health of Indian River Lagoon. The Indian River
Lagoon plays a main role in the daily life among the residents in this area and our local
economy. These environmental factors will serve to make this project very attractive for
securing financial grants from state and federal agencies to construct the project. This
Feasibility Study may be incorporated as a supporting document for use in the process
of preparing financial grant applications. Due to the high estimated cost per ERU, grant
funding will be essential to the success of this project.
In addition to grant funds, project financing will also be required by Indian River County
Utilities Department either by financial assessments against users impacted by the
project or by the County Utilities Department securing project financing or some
combination of assessments and County funding.
This project, if undertaken, will have substantial environmental benefits to the Indian River
Lagoon, which benefits all residents of Indian River County. Therefore, some County
contribution to the cost of improvements may be justified. If sufficient grant funds are
secured, a combination of County funding and project assessments could be developed to
facilitate public acceptance of the project.
Page 25 of 25
I air -a7
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
FEASIBILITY STUDY
I RCDUS UCP # 4101
SUMMERPLACE AND OCEAN AIRE SUBDIVISIONS
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
SITE DATA
CLIENT: IRCDUS
1801 27TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
ENGINEER: SCHULKE, BITTLE AND STODDARD, L.L.C.
1717 INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD
SUITE 201
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
(772) 770-9622
SITE LOCATION: SUMMERPLACE SUBDIVISION AND
OCEAN AIRE SUBDIVISION
L VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING -LAND PLANNING- ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
* CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION NO.: 00008668
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 FAI
Kwa all I;w'�, TEL 7721770-9622 FAX 7721770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com
uur4iui
Aft. 0-19
INDEX OF FIGURES, DRAWINGS
APPENDIX
SECTION A
EXISTING
SITE CONDITIONS
A-1
LOCATION MAP
A-2
EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION MAP
A-3
SOIL BORINGS (10 PAGES)
A-4
EXISTING CONDITIONS BASE PLAN
SECTION B
GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEM
B-1
ESTIMATE
B-2
TYP CAL RESIDENTIAL LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
B-3
TYPICAL DETAILS
B-4
SYSTEM PHOTOGRAPHS
B-5
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
SECTION C
VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM
C-1
ESTIMATE
G2
TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
G3
TYPICAL DETAILS
C-4
SYSTEM ILLUSTRATIONS (3 PAGES)
C-5
SYSTEM PHOTOGRAPHS
C6
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
SECTION D
LOW
PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM
D-1
ESTIMATE (2 PAGES)
D-2
TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
D-3
TYPICAL DETAILS
D-4
SYSTEM PHOTOGRAPHS
D-5
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
D-6
ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (4 PAGES)
PLAN AND RISER DIAGRAMS
SECTION E
EXISTING
LIFT STATION AT WABASSO BEACH
E-1
EXISTING LIFT STATION AT WABASSO BEACH
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING -LAND PLANNING- ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING
* CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION NO.: 00008668
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 FAI
Kwa all I;w'�, TEL 7721770-9622 FAX 7721770-9496 EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com
uur4iui
Aft. 0-19
SECTION A
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
A-1 LOCATION MAP
A-2 EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM LOCATION MAP
A-3 SOIL BORINGS (10 PAGES)
A-4 EXISTING CONDITIONS BASE PLAN
Q,4. zq
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. I SECTION A
IRCDUS UCP #4101 can & STRUCrwea EAO*TW • unb PLAMWW • FNW*~NrAL PERWnAW LOCATION MAP A-1
1801 27TH STREET CE"IFICAT 1 °C AWHOWATON "0•'1717 oaooaeea
RIDA
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL772 INDIAN
70- 6 2 ER FAtX7772/770-9496 EMAIL infoltsb , SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, engineersBcam OF4
-a-(f•3t)
ial.•3i
ULA' 4 41 U1
)Z., _3:X
KSM
KELLER, SCHLEICHER & MacWILLIAM ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
MARTIN (772) 337-7765 P.O. BOX 78-1377, SEBASTIAN, FL 32978-1377 SEBASTIAN (772) 689-0712
PALM BEACH (561) 845-7445 www Asmengineetingnet MELBOURNE (321) 768-8488
FAX (561) 845-8876 E -Mail. KSM@KSMENGINEERING.NET ST. LUCIE (772) 229-9093
CA.: SM FAX (772) 589-6469
October 16, 2013
Jodah B. Bittle, P.E.
Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard
1717 Indian River Boulevard
Suits 201
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Re: Summer Place
Proposed Sanitary Sewer
Indian River County, Florida
KSM Project #: 131663-b
Dear Mr. Bittle:
As requested, KSM Engineering & Testing has performed a subsurface investigation at
the referenced site. Presentation of the data gathered during the investigation, together
with our geotechnical related opinions, are included in this report.
Project Description:
A Sanitary Gravity Sewer System including a Lift Station is planned for the Summer
Place Subdivision.
The scope of our study consisted of the following:
1. Performed Standard Penetration Test Borings in the proposed project area to
estimate the subsurface soils condition.
2. Measured the groundwater leVel at each boring.
3. Evaluated the existing soil conditions with respect to the proposed project.
4. Prepared this report to document our findings.
Ronald G. Keller, P.E.., 37293/St Llo. No.: 860 / Julie I- Keller, PE..* 68368
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULIKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
six & SnMUW aMMM - MW MOM* awwmft ��
IRCDUS UCP #4101
BORINGS
I
A -3A
I
1801 27TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
CERnFiMVM OF ARHOWAIIN W_
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL772/770-9622 FAX772/770-9496 EMAIL infoQsbsengineem.wm
OF
ULA' 4 41 U1
)Z., _3:X
PC,1i;L21111
t"a.(A•33
l>► ►,3 M
KELLER, SCHLEICHER & MacWILLIAM ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
MARTIN (772) 337-7755 RO. BOX 78-1377, SEBASTIAN, FL 32978-1377 SEBASTIAN (772) 589-0712
PALM BEACH (561) 845-7445 www ksmengineering net MELBOURNE (321) 768-8488
FAX (561) 845-8876 E -Mail: KSMOKSMENGINEERING.NET ST. LUCIE (772) 229-9493
C.A.: 5693 FAX (772) 589-6469
Proposed Sanitary Sewer -2- October 16, 2013
Summer Place
Site Investigation:
The site investigation program consisted of performing six (6) Standard penetration test
borings, (1) to a depth of 21 feet and (5) to depths of 12 feet, in the proposed sanitary
sewer project area. The locations of the borings are indicated on the attached location
plan.
The SPT borings were completed in accordance with procedures described in ASTM D-
1586. A standard 1.5 inch I.D., 2 inch O.D. split -spoon sampler is driven into the soil by
successive blows of a 140 pound hammer freely falling 30 inches. The number of
blows required to drive the sampler 1 foot, after seating 6 in., is designated the
Penetration Resistance, or "N" value. At regular intervals the sampler is extracted from
the ground and opened to allow visual examination and classification of the retained
soil sample. Also, the groundwater table was allowed to stabilize and the depth of the
groundwater elevation recorded from existing grade.
The records of the soils encountered, the penetration resistances and groundwater
level are shown on the attached logs.
Findings:
Based on the information obtained from this site investigation, we are pleased to offer
the following evaluation:
The boring logs indicate the subsurface conditions consist mostly of fine-grained sand.
Shell fragments were also found in the borings. "N" values recorded during the boring
operation indicate the soil density is generally loose to medium dense from the surface
to a depth of approximately 12 feet and generally dense from 12 feet to 21 feet. Please
refer to the soil boring logs for specific information relative to the soil description.
Ronald G. Keller, P.E.: 372931 Sl Lic. No.: 860 f Julie E. Keller, RE.: 68366
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
plat i M CAAPAt aWJM C •"PLAA M: • DI&W:1El M PDWW W
IRCDUS UCP #4101
BORINGS
A-313
1841 27TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
CEMWrJ W OF AUn*VtIZXI= N0.:
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 7721770-9496 EMAIL inta@ssbsengineem.wm
OF 4
PC,1i;L21111
t"a.(A•33
tX,r*4lU7
;�& •3y
KAJ Lrl
KELLER, SCHLEICHER & MaCWILLIAM ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC.
MARTIN (772) 337-7755 P;{7, BOX 78-1377, SEBASTIAN, FL 3297$-13n SEBASi1AN (772) 589-0712
PALM BEACH (561) 645-7445 www.ksmangineering.net MELBOURNE (321) 768 -BM
FAX (561) 845-8876 E -Mail: KSM@KSMENGINEERING.NET ST. LUCIE (772) 229-9093
CA: 5693 FAX (772) 589-6469
Proposed Sanitary Sewer -3- October 16, 2013
Summer Place
The groundwater table was measured in the test borings as follows:
Test Location Groundwater DeRth
B-1 60't
B-2 106"
B-3 %if
B-4 54'"
B-5 46"
B-6 56"
Conclusion:
The subsurface soils found in the test borings appears suitable for the proposed gravity
sewer line and lift station. Depending on the depth of the gravity sewer line temporary
dewatering will be required during construction of the gravity sewer system.
Closure:
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and
foundation engineering practices based on the results of the test borings and the
proposed project. This report does not reflect any variations which may occur between
the borings. if variations appear evident during the course of construction, it would be
necessary to re-evaluate the recommendations of this project.
We ar pleased to be of assistance to you on this phase of your project. When we may
11;'to you or should you have any questions, please feel free to call.
UI'vice
Y J• Nof ra836 •
•
�fses�"
E-mail to: jbiftle@sbsengineers.com
Ronald G. Keller, RE.: 37293 l SI Lic. No.: 860 / Julie E. Keller, P.E.: 68386
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
saw a SIRUCI M B"MW • LAAO "W • DWQVIIOM PfR1YW
CMWICARON OF wm'°IM"I°" 1a.:
IRCDUS UCP #4101
1801 27TH STREET
BORINGS
A -3C
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32900
TEL772/770-9022 FAX7721770-9490 EMAIL infaCsbsengineem.wm
OF 4
tX,r*4lU7
;�& •3y
UL:N V 41 U1
l--kG'3S
KSM Engineering and Testing BORING NUMBER B-1
KS71 ,f P.O. 8mc 78.1377 PAGE 1 OF 1
1V1 Sebastian, FL 32978
'Telephone: (772}588-0712
Fax (772)589-6489
CLIENT _Schulke, Bfts & Stoddard PROJECT NAME Proposed Sanitary Sewer
PROJECT NUMBER 131683 bPROJECT LOCATION Summer Plats. Indian River Coutft, Florida
DATE STARTED COMPLETED 10/14113 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE inches
DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS.
DRILLING METHOD Split Spoon Sampler QAT TIME OF DRILLING 540 ft
LOGGED BY DP/DH/EJ CHECKED BY X AT END OF DRILLING —
NOTES wee Attached Location Plan AFTER DRILLING
W
Z
♦ SPT N VALUE
=
U
>
00,
O
wa
20 40 60 80
PL MC LL
K
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
W M
Cpl
4
z
av
c9Jz
uj
m�Z
U�
}
20 40 60 80
0 FINES CONTENT (%) O
R
o
0 40 60 80
Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Fragments
Light Bram Sand with Traces of Shell Fragments 3-2-3 -
...
..
SS �
f;•
_ ... ... ..
5 •�
()
• SS 6-11-14
.. .
{25}
�. :...... :....... : ...
10 10-10-16
V—SS
d:. {z6) :.......:.......:......
Gray Sand, Slightly Silty with Traces of Shell Fragments 12-16-19
Bottom of borehole at 12.0 %et
F�
N
q0
V
aS
s
s
0
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SGHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.G.
IRCDUS UCP #4101
BORINGS
SECTION A
A -3D
pyg & uqa DOOMW - MW PLOIUM . DMOAMMI,a, pDW
1801 27TH STREET
aalVICAWK Of HnIIamA7101 Ia: a000eem
OF 4
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
1717
TEL772n/D77 962IAN \2 RFAXX77721�770-9496ITE 201 �EMAIRO L no(Msbsseng�eerswm 60
UL:N V 41 U1
l--kG'3S
1'.\G.3('
KSM Engineering and Testing BORING NUMBER B-2
PAGE 1 f i
P,O. BoSebastian,
KSM
FL32978
Telephone: (772)589.0712
Fax: {772}589.6469
CLIENT Schulke. Side A. Stoddard PROJECT NAME Praoosed Sanitary Sewer
PROJECT NUMBER 131663-b PROJECT LOCATION Summer Place. Indian River County, Florida
DATE STARTED COMPLETED 10/10113 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE inches
DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS:
DRILLING METHOD Split Spoon Sampler �.ZAT TIME OF DRILLING 8.83
LOGGED BY DP/DH/EJ CHECKED BY JK AT END OF DRILLING
NOTES See Attached Location Plan AFTER DRILLING
uiz
♦ SPT N VALUE A
DESCRIPTION
w
3
O z ma
o_
m
E
Z
2040
[ACBQ �
-
p
MATERIAL
a
}w>
O
O >
i
,I
20 40 60 80
0wig
r9
W
U
a
O FINES CONTENT {%} D
20 40 60 80
Light Brown Sand with a Few Pieces of Rock
........_.- ..............d.............
Gray Sand with Traces of RootsSS 43-2
Light Brown Sand with Traces of Shall Fragments
2-3-3
SS
... ..
:
6
S5 363}3
..
..........
3-2-3..... _.............
SS
{5}
10 S5 {�
SS 8-9-11
Bottom of borehole at 12.0 feet. 20
a
aS
9
Yi
f
N
6i
M
F
t7
S
U
O
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
IRCDUS UCP #4101
M & SPX71M 04NMDW • L" PIM11l9>, -i: 11*1112VACTilt Pry
BORINGS
A-3E
1801 27TH STREET
�1m or Aingrumm W_
OF 4
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL 7721770-9622 FAX 7721770-9496 EMAIL infogsbsengineem.wm
I Ir'D ar eini
1'.\G.3('
IaG•3-7
KSM Engineering and Testing BORING NUMBER B-3
KS71 �f P.O, Bax 78-1377 PAGE 1 OF i
1V.0 Sebastian, FL 32978
Telephone: {772}589-0712
Fax: (772)589-8489
CLIENT Schulke Bittle 8 Stoddard PROJECTNAME Proposed SanitarySewer
PROJECT NUMBER 131683-b PROJECT LOCATION Summer Place, Indian River County, Florida
DATE STARTED COMPLETED 10/10/13 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE inches
DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS:
DRILLING METHOD it Spoon Sampler —VATTIME OF DRILLING 4.68 ft
LOGGED BY DP/DH/EJ CHECKED BY JK AT END OF DRILLING —
NOTES See Attached Location Plan AFTER DRILLING —
$
A SPT N VALUE 1
U
�
=
wa
20 40 60 80
M
a
p
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
a g
oa
M'
2d1---"'i40 60 ce
p FINES CONTENT (%) p
c
zz
�"
az
8
CL
>-
o
0
20 40 60 80
•� Brown Sand with Trace of Shell
;' 4-4-8
:.. SS
16t:•
57
a SS
(-
sl
5
a•: 8 7 B
...
: Light Brown Sand with Trace of Shell .. ... .. ..
'
b• 7-5-9
Ess
•:4: X1314 W ...:...... �.....
10
:.. {27}
$•; SS 8-8-13
Bottom of borehole at 12.0 feel 21
'a
r,
M
v
g
N
0
n
s
3
a
m
0
0
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
IRCDUS UCP #4101
aw a s7RWnm BAWMW - LAW PLAWW • eta P&WW
BORINGS
A-3F
1801 27TH STREET
ca"Incam or wman ACIM nD_ 6000lM!
OF 4
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL772/770-9622 FAX7721770-9496 EMAIL into@sbs=,nom-.
I Ir.P :ff danl
IaG•3-7
«4.38
KSM Engineering and Testing BORING NUMBER B-4
jj (� �f 1377 PAGE 1 OF 1
P.O. Box.tl;�.)1►'1 FL
Sebastian 32978
Telephone: (772)589-0712
Fax (772)589.8489
CLIENT Schulke Billie S Stoddard PROJECT NAME Proposed Sanitary Sewer
PROJECT NUMBER 131663•b PROJECT LOCATION Summer Place Indian River County Florida
DATE STARTED COMPLETED 10/10/13 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE Inches
DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS:
DRILLING METHOD Split Spoon Sampler Q AT TIME OF DRILLING 4.50 ft
LOGGED BY DP/DH/EJ CHECKED BY JK AT END OF DRILLING
ROTES age AttachedLocationn AFTER DRILLING
uj♦
SPT N VALUE
20 40 60 80
E9
w
�^
$z�
n
C
PL MC LL
M--80
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
j
Y
z
2j 40
Q
z
V.-.
mUZ
V
0 FINES CONTENT (%) D
O
O
WQ
}
D
20 60 80a
•.•.•. Brown Sand
... _..............
; •, Brown Sand with Trace of ShellSS 3-3-5
•:44- SS 4-3-7 i.......i..
..i.. ..
(10)
4�:: Light Brawn Sand with Trace of Shell
5
d. SS 6-7d
(14)
'
.
7-9-11
• SS
�. (20)
10 �` SS 9-8-12
C)
SS 8-12-13
Bottom of borehole at 12.0 feet. 28
R
'
O
N
:r
M
w
C7
'
m
w
C7
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
IRCDUS UCP #4141
OW t SMWR • MND R M • O MAdSMAL P193mMC
RAt MI
BORINGS
A-3G
1801 27TH STREET
� 1001 NW o099eeee
'f"A10N OF A"1RQA7
OF 4
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL772/770-9622 FAX772/770-9496 EMAIL infoQsbsengineers.com
I Ir'D 41 Ain1
«4.38
I '.'t 1, - 3 q
KSM Engineering and Testing BORING NUMBER B-5
KSMP.O. Box 78-1377 PAGE I OF 1
Sebastlan, FL 32978
Telephone: (772)589-0712
Fax (772)589-6469
CLIENT Schulke. Bft 4 Stoddard PROJECT NAME Proposed Sanitary Sewer
PROJECT NUMBER 131663-b PROJECT LOCATION Summer Place. Indian River County, Florida
DATE STARTED COMPLETED 10/10113 GROUND ELEVATION _ HOLE SIZE Inches
DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS:
DRILLING METHOD Sold Spoon Sampler AT TIME OF DRILLING 3.53 It
LOGGED BY DPIDHIEJ — CHECKED BY X AT END OF DRILLING ---
NOTES See Attached Location Plan AFTER DRILLING
NOTES
W
e-
A SPT N VALUE A
20 40 60 80
te
>-
W
Ul
UJI
IL
PL MC LL
X8
CL
E E
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
W
�'l
M
z
1
I= I
W g -j
0
201-�80
[I FINES CONTENT (%) 0
❑
�z
8
�
W
CL
a
20 40 60 80
0
Gray Sand with Tram of Roots
t:rK Light Brown Sand with Trams of Shell Fragments 3-3-3
K-S—S
(6)
L
....... ........
2-3.4
(7) ...... ......
4-4-7 ..... . ......
ESS 6-7-10
(17)
13-1516 ....... ......
10 SS (31) .......•
...
...... . ..... ....
SS 16-19-23
(42) ... 1. .......... ...
..... ..... . ...... ......
Light Brownish Gray Sand, Slightly Silly with Traces of Shell 17-17-21
Fragments (38) ... ......
15
SS 18-1544
(29)
-S— 12-16-19
(35) ... . .......
20 SS
Bottom of borehole at 21.0 feet. 2
SS 8
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
IRCDUS UCP #4101
cast & snRom 00JEOW -"RM W - D""9M PDWW
BORINGS
A-31-1
1801 27TH STREET
COUVII1901. OF ALIPIN131=101
OF
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
1717 IND IAN RIVER BLVD, SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 7721770-9496 EMAIL infe@sb--ng1n—m mm
I Ir1.P:ff Alni
I '.'t 1, - 3 q
KSM Engineering and Testing BORING NUMBER B-6
�,j P.O. Box 78-1377 PAGE i OF 1
KS
1V1. Sebastian, FL 32978
Telephone: {772}5$9-0712
Fax {772}589.6469
CLIENT Schulke, Billie S Sto dard PROJECT NAME Proposed Sanitary Sewer
PROJECT NUMBER 131663-b PROJECT LOCATION Summer Plays, Indian River County, Florida
DATE STARTED COMPLETED 10/10113 GROUND ELEVATION HOLE SIZE inches
DRILLING CONTRACTOR GROUND WATER LEVELS:
DRILLING METHOD Split Spoon Samples -VAT TIME OF DRILUNG 4.66 ft
LOGGED BY OPiDH/EJ CHECKED BY JK AT END OF DRILLING —
NOTES �SeeAttagW Location Pian AFTER DRILLING —
z
A SPT N VALUE A
+v
ILO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
p_
Li
OMC
9
Z
20 4 60 80
PL -LL
3
coo
20 40 60 80
Q FINES CONTENT {%} 0
z
G
20 40 6D 80
Dark Gray Sand with Roots
... Light Brown Sand with Traces of Shell FragmentsSS 3-2-4
• {6}
64-6
.Q,
.. 5-M
�• SS
1a•.
8-6-5 .. ... .., ..
b� SS {
i0'� SS 911-13
•Q• {24}
SS 11-10-14
Bottom of borehole at 12.0 feet. 24
n
m
Yf
m
mq0
J
V
a
m
w
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
IRCDUS UCP #4101
CK : MUM" pays • LAND PL4WM • fluN170Auovr,Ir, POW=
BORINGS
A-31
1801 27TH STREET
a090eeee
C°"IC-1f0N Of ~ niartmA10N Nw1717
OF 4
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
DIAN IDA 32960
TEL 77217770 962\2 RFAlX 7772 / 770-9496SUITE 201�EMAIL nio(gsbsRO BEACH,seng n—m ram
a4 -A4 i
Legend
Proposed Service Boundat
F {
f
7 -
I ai' 1
F
:J
L.....1
AZ
_
1 1 yi. A
- LEGEND
e4
LOCATION OF SPT SOIL BORING.
616120-
LOCATION PLAN �su9,l>1�,mmeIm�N6e�sw
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE $ STODDARD, L.L.C.
SECTION A
IRCDUS UCP #4101
taVst & smucRM Svc • two RMW • awna+r UM PBrdffnw
BORINGS
A -3J
1801 27TH STREET
C113411FICA70N OF N1n10M/710N N6' oaooeeee
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
OF 4
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
TEL7721770.9622 FAX772/770-9496 EMAIL into@sbsengineemm
I InP A ditty
a4 -A4 i
.r aw,ma ewzmins"OA you zu,� NVId 6 0� t1.4 H N8 0
F-01-11-1
0°�0� �3 ���MaW0�t�t�096.1£tl O b3 'H3V39 0139WaMON3 xaN.x S f w 3SVG SNOilI0N0`J 133a1S H1tZ toet ¢ '(3UV(3OOIS'8311119'3Nlf1HOS JNUSIX3 roto M din snaoai a
a&•y2
SECTION B
GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEM
B-1 ESTIMATE
B-2 TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
B-3 TYPICAL DETAILS
B-4 SYSTEM PHOTOGRAPHS
B-5 CONCEPTUAL PLAN
(•y3
Section B - Gravity Sewer System
Cost Estimate - Gravity
Engineer's Estimate
Unit
Quantity
Unit Price Total
Mobilization
LS
1
$90,000.00
$90,000.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 10'-12'
EA
1
$6,840.00
$6,840.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 8'-10'
EA
4
$5,760.00
$23,040.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 6'-8'
EA
6
$4,560.00
$27,360.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 4'-6'
EA
26
$3,822.00
$99,372.00
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 10'-12'/ Testing
LF
350
$65.00
$22,750.00
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 8'-10'/ Testing
LF
2085
$53.71
$111,985.35
8" Gravity Sewer- Depth 6'-8'/ Testing
LF
296
$49.51
$14,654.96
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 4'-6'/ Testing
LF
8057
$42.91
$345,725.87
8" D.I.P. Gravity Sewer - Shallow Depth < 36"
LF
557
$50.00
$27,850.00
Single Service Lateral
EA
21
$1,316.40
$27,644.40
Double Service Lateral
EA
98
$1,550.40
$151,939.20
4" Force Main Connection to Existing 12" FM on CR 510 with 12" x
4" Wet Tap and 4" Tapping Valve
EA
1
$2,400.00
$2,400.00
4" PVC Force Main
LF
1265
$13.50
$17,077.50
4" HOPE Directional Bore
LF
60
$40.00
$2,400.00
4" Driveway Bore
LF
163
$40.00
$6,520.00
Remove and Replace Shell/Gravel Driveways (at Force Main)
LF
108
$15.00
$1,620.00
Sewer Service Connections House to Street/ Abandon Septic Tank
EA
217
$2,250.00
$488,250.00
Paved Road Resoration @ Gravity Sewer
LF
7123
$37.00
$263,551.00
Dirt Road Restoration @ Gravity Sewer
LF
4222
$12.00
$50,664.00
Lawn Restoration @ Force Main
LF
1265
$4.90
$6,198.50
Construct County Lift Station, Complete and Operable, Concrete
Drive & Housekeeping pad
LS
1
$185,000.00
$185,000.00
Landscaping at Lift Station
LS
1
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
Maintenance of Traffic
LS
1
$23,400.00
$23,400.00
Subtotal
$2,011,242.78
Survey Stake -out /As -Built
%
1.50%
$2,011,242.78
$30,168.64
FPL 480 Volt Service (FPL Quote)
LS
1
$62,000.00 1
$62,000.00
Subtotall
$2,103,411.42
Gravity Collection System - SE Sub -Area
Engineer's Estimate
Unit
lQuantity
Unit Price Total
Mobilization
LS
1
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
Diesel Generator / ATS at Existing L.S.
LS
1
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 30'-12'
EA
1
$6,840.00
$6,840.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 8'-10'
EA
3
$5,760.00
$17,280.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 6-8'
EA
2
$4,560.00
$9,120.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 4'-6'
EA
2
$3,822.00
$7,644.00
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 10'-12'
LF
360
$65.00
$23,400.00
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 8'-10'
LF
290
$53.71
$15,575.90
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 6'-8'
LF
1025
$49.51
$50,747.75
B" Gravity Sewer - Depth 4'-6'
LF
845
$42.91
$36,258.95
8" HDPE Directional Bore
LF
240
$85.00
$20,400.00
Single Service Lateral
EA
6
$1,587.60
$9,525.60
Double Service Lateral
EA
23
$1,821.60
$41,896.80
Conned to Existing Manhole on SR A -1-A
EA
i
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
Sewer Service Connections House to Street Abandon Septic Tank
EA
52
$2,250.00
$117,000.00
Paved Road Restoration @ Gravity Sewer
LF
0
$37.00
$0.00
Dirt Road Restoration @ Gravity Sewer
LF
2520
$12.00
$30,240.00
Maintenance of Traffic
LS
1
$6,000.00
$6,00090
Subtotal
$484,429.00
Survey Stake -out /As -Built
%
1.50%$484,429.00
$7,266.44
Subtotal
$491,695.44
Total Construction Costs
$2,595,106.86
Other
Design/Permitting - Final Engineering
%
7.50%
$2,595,106.86
$194,633.01
Contingency
%
10%
$2,595,106.86
$259,510.69
Grand Total
$3,049,250.56
8-1 of 5
I a4 • A4
DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS
ALL PROPOSED SANITARY GRAVITY SEWER SLOPED AT 0.32%.
ALL MANHOLES HAVE A 0.10' DROP ACROSS THE STRUCTURE.
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEM SECTION B
IRCDUS UCP #4101 CMt * SMUCrLft EACx+MOV - LAND PLANW � ENWRONUENTAL PENWIlm -TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LOT B-2
1801 27TH STREET c"*l*V r4k or w>N rwaax�ND'` 0000"m
IDA 32960
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL7721771717 IND - 622 FAX772/770-9496BL., SUITE 201�EMAIL nia@sbsseRO BEACH, ng eers.mm DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF 5
I ZIr . t45
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM SECTION C
IRCDUS UCP #4141 Cft A SMUCRARAt EN6C'ERAW • wan PLAN" - ENVIRMWEN7u PERNNffic TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LOT C-2
1841 27TH STREET 1717 c[rtmum" a "m"°'°=""°"RO ' BEACH, ° FLORIDA
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL77 1 U"96 2ERFAX772I�770-9496�EMAILinfb@sbsseng eers-mm DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF 6
FROM
z VALVE
> VALVE
45' PVC O
ELBOW \ R e\
45' PVC
ELBOW
DIRECTION
OF
FLOW
NOTES;
1. FITTINGS AND PMES SHALL BE EITHER
BCH. 10 PNC OR BOB 21 PVC (PUSH -0N)
Z. THE r SERVICE LATERAL CONNECTS TOA
BRANCH OR MAB! LINE. VACUUM LINES ARE
UID MATH A SLIGHT SLOPE (0.2%)
TOWARD THE VACUUM STATION SINCE
VACUUM PROVIDES ADEQUATE VELOCDV.
THEVACUUMM KSAREINSTALLEDMATHA
SAWTOOTH—F! E TO MINIMIZE BURIAL
DEPTH. WHEN THE VACUUM LINE EXCEEDS
THE MINIMAL COVER V A FOOT OR MORE.
INSERTINGT I FITTINGSANDASHORT
SEC OF PIPE CREATES A LIFT BACK TO
MINIMUM COVER.
0
VAC
EXISTING
4' PVC VAC. MgIN
SDR 21
WYE FITTING
SLOPE PIPE BE }
TWEEN
LIFTS - SEE SCHEDULE w
BELOW M z o
LVACUUM SYSTEM TYPICAL PROFILE
SCALE: N.T.S.
40' TO 60' R.O.W. TYPICAL
FROM
CONSTRUCT PIPE
z w
3" PVC VAC.
IN SAWTOOTH
PROFILE
>
4 O
v
LATERAL
> 13Q 0.20%
45' PVC
ELBOW
4' AVC C. MAIN
45' PVC
ELBOW
• 16P 1'
4' PVC VAC. MgIN
SDR 21
WYE FITTING
SLOPE PIPE BE }
TWEEN
LIFTS - SEE SCHEDULE w
BELOW M z o
LVACUUM SYSTEM TYPICAL PROFILE
SCALE: N.T.S.
40' TO 60' R.O.W. TYPICAL
FROM
PfPE DIAMETER
VALVE
PIT
<,oa 2•
3" PVC VAC.
> 13Q 0.20%
LATERAL
4' AVC C. MAIN
0.20%
• 16P 1'
DIRECTION
SDR 21
c 190 S
WYE FITTING
OF
FLOW
SLOPE SCHEDULE
PfPE DIAMETER
DISTANCE BETM£EN MINIMUM FALL
UFT. REWIRED
> 100' DSD%
<,oa 2•
S'
> 13Q 0.20%
<130 0'
t0•
0.20%
• 16P 1'
12'
> 180' OSO%
c 190 S
MAINTAIN FDEP
MIN. VERT.
SEPARATION
EXISTING WM
PROPOSED VAC.
LATERAL (BORE
BENEATH ROAD)
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. SECTION C
IRCDUS UCP #4101 CMt k S/RbCfiM ENGAffRAVG • LAND PLAMIAtiG • FNVNONYENIK PffiwR C VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM
1801 27TH STREET CER"ACAMN OF ALITHO' M" NO- °000668° TYPICAL DETAILS C-3
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL 77 / IAN 770.622 FAXX VD 772 / 77a849601 �EMAIRO I nfoaBCs FLORIDA
g Reers.Dom OF 6
I ICP # 4101
iat, •s'a
HOW IT WORKS - AT THE HOUSE
VALVE PIT
9pper
amber
led from
sump
Lower
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
�= Atmospheric air Vacuum
(3)
Differential
SECTION C
IRCDUS UCP #4101
prat a SMIOR uc RMAM �c • MAIDFMAMc - aMMME TAL r to
PositiveNegative
C -4A
pressure propels
(y3
House to pit
pressure* Pressure
sewage toward
vacuum station
via gravity
lateral
UCP # 4101
VALVE PIT
9pper
amber
led from
sump
Lower
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE $ STODDARD, L.L.C.
VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM
SECTION C
IRCDUS UCP #4101
prat a SMIOR uc RMAM �c • MAIDFMAMc - aMMME TAL r to
SYSTEM ILLUSTRATIONS
C -4A
1801 27TH STREET
aR 1 OF AUMORQA70N NO- 999oeeee
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
OF 6
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL intoQsbsengineers.com
UCP # 4101
)a(.' •s3
VALVE PIT PACKAGE
VALVE PIT OPERATION
4) Differential pressure j
Positive pressure,
:Atmospheric air from
air intake
1) Sewage fills
the sump
2) As sump fills, air
trapped in
sensor pipe is
transmitted via
tubing to the
valve controller
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C.
VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM
SECTION C
IRCDUS UCP #4101
m & smwWAL a vc • LAND vtar" - aMWAe ca
SYSTEM ILLUSTRATIONS
C -4B
1801 27TH STREET
DEWICA M OF AUMO QA7101 N0= 000011110000o
OF 6
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL772/770-9622 FAX772/770-9496 EMAIL inieasbsengineem.mm
UCP # 4101
I aI, •s'f
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. I
VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM I SECTION C
IRCDUS UCP #4101 cnu & SMUCR* t EACW*#X • tAnb PLAAMW - ENY14~NIAL PERYIMW C -4C
1841 27TH STREET C""'"W" Or wA101AW04 "0.: °0°°°b6° SYSTEM ILLUSTRATIONS
1717 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL772/77- RIVER
FAX772/770-9496 EMAIITE 201 VERO L of @sbs ngn --- CH, FLORID 32960 OF 6
ia(o'SS
TYPICAL
VACUUM PUMP STATION
TYPICAL
VALVE PIT COVER AND
AIR TERMINAL
TYPICAL
VACUUM PUMPS
TYPICAL COLLECTION TANK
AND SEWER PUMPS
AND SEWER PUMPS
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. ISECTION C
IRCDUS UCP #4141 CAt * STRUC " £nIG ERM - LW PL01"V • FNDI AWN7AL PEBumw6 VACUUM SEWER SYSTEM
1801 27TH STREET CERMCA N a m+ .UTHONUI "0v 000086118 SYSTEM PHOTOGRAPHS C-5
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 OF S
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL772/770-9622 FAX772/770-9496 EMAIL iniotMsbsen0ineem.wm
a G '.szi
w! ima3 esearou iut rva zmarott tztt ist
_ maze vawov 'rr�v3e oaaA tat MM'ame aanra "W"tui A1Nn00 113AItl NVIONI
W3ISAS m3M3S WMOtlA 096Z£ V018O13 HOV39 ON3A jr
--F-11,114i
't OW'a,W3,h 3int' SfWN'dld ivnid3ONO0 133a1s H11Z lostxs'4LIt/t700tg S 3llllg 'gN 1t1HOs tofu i din sno041 a
mm
lac -Sq
. a
..ON
mm
lac -Sq
SECTION D
LOW PRESSURE SEWER SYSTEM
D-1 ESTIMATE (2 PAGES)
D-2 TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LOT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
D-3 TYPICAL DETAILS
D-4 SYSTEM PHOTOGRAPHS
D-5 CONCEPTUAL PLAN
D-6 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
PLAN AND RISER DIAGRAMS (4 PAGES)
Q(0-59
Section D - Low Pressure Sewer System
Cost Estimate - Low Pressure
Engineer's Estimate
Unit
Quantity
Unit Price
Total
Mobilization
LS
1
$90,000.00
$90,000.00
4" PVC Force Main
LF
10826
$13.50
$146,151.00
2" Service Lateral - Short
EA
58
$1,666.00
$96,628.00
2" Service Lateral - Long w/ Bored Casing - Paved
EA
23
$3,000.00
$69,000.00
2" Service Lateral w/ Casing - Long - Unpaved
EA
38
$2,444.00
$92,872.00
4" HDPE Directional Bore
LF
455
$40.00
$18,200.00
4" Terminal C.O.
EA
21
$500.00
$10,500.00
4" Driveway Bore
LF
525
$40.00
$21,000.00
4" Gate Valve
EA
20
$880.00
$17,600.00
4" Force Main Connection to Existing FM with 12" x 4"
Wet Tap and 4" Tapping Valve
EA
6
$2,400.00
$14,400.00
Remove and Replace Shell/Gravel Driveways
LF
1158
$15.00
$17,370.00
Dirt Road restoration @ Force Main
LF
350
$12.00
$4,200.00
Lawn Restoration @ Force Main
LF
9318
$4.90
$45,658.20
Sewer Service Connections House to Street / Abandon
Septic Tank
EA
217
$2,250.00
$488,250.00
Spare Parts
SET
1
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
Simplex Pump Station
EA
21
1 $8,500.00
$178,500.00
Duplex Pump Station
EA
98
$15,900.00
$1,558,200.00
Electric Distribution Network (See Separate Estimate)
LS
1
$1,558,076.68 $1,558,076.68
Maintenance of Traffic
LS
1
$22,800.00
$22,800.00
Subtotal
$4,469,405.88
Survey Stake -Out/ As-Builts
%
1.50%
1 $4,469,405.881
$67,041.09
FPL 480 Volt Service (FPL Quote) - 3 Locations
LS
1
1 $83,000.00
1 $83,000.00
Subtotal
$4,619,446.97
Gravity Collection System - SE Sub -Area
Engineer's Estimate
Unit
Quantity
Unit Price
Total
Mobilization
LS
1
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
Diesel Generator / ATS at Existing L.S.
LS
1
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 10'-12'
EA
1
$6,840.00
$6,840.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 8'-10'
EA
3
$5,760.00
$17,280.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 6'-8'
EA
2
$4,560.00
$9,120.00
4' Diameter Manholes - Depth 4'-6'
EA
2
$3,822.00
$7,644.00
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 10'-12'
LF
360
$65.00
$23,400.00
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 8'-10'
LF
290
$53.71
$15,575.90
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 6'-8'
LF
1025
$49.51
$50,747.75
8" Gravity Sewer - Depth 4'-6'
LF
845
$42.91
$36,258.95
8" HDPE Directional Bore
LF
240
$85.00
$20,400.00
Single Service Lateral
EA
6
$1,587.60
$9,525.60
Double Service Lateral
EA
23
$1,821.60
$41,896.80
Connect to Existing Manhole on SR A -1-A
EA
1
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
Sewer Service Connections House to Street / Abandon
Septic Tank
EA
S2
$2,250.00
$117,000.00
Paved Road Restoration @ Gravity Sewer
LF
0
$37.00
$0.00
Dirt Road Restoration @ Gravity Sewer
LF
2520
$12.00
$30,240.00
Maintenance of Traffic
LS
1
$6,000.00
$6,000.00
Subtotall
$484,429.00
Survey Stake -out / As -Built
%
1.50%
$484,429.00
$7,266.44
Subtotal
$491,695.44
Total Construction Costs $5,111,142.40
Other
Design/Permitting - Final Engineering
%
7.50%
$5,111,142.40
$383,335.68
Contingency
%
10%
$5,111,142.40
$511,114.24
Grand Total
$6,005,592.32
a6 .s9
IQ.t,•G0
111111111011111
IMMUNE
UVII
NONE
MENIMMINE
IQ.t,•G0
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY
IRCDUS UCP #4101
1801 27TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
CIM & SM CIVI t £N6WE£RW • LAND FLAW" • £NW190A ENTAL v£R►umvc SYSTEM
CERMCA7 N Or AUTHO "AT" NO, TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LOT
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIL inioftsbsenaineem.mm
SECTION D
D-2
OF 6
iac,. G
DUPLEX LIFT STATION
• Dt D
WITHIN LIMITS OF
i 1 -0 i �I V ��1 d"Ifj'•
DISTURBAVCE
TREES
IN R.O.W.
gft,._
PROPOSED LOW
PRESSURE
FORCE MAIN
SIMPLEX LIFT STATION
LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM TYPICAL SECTION
SCALE: 1' • to -0'
MAINTAIN FDEP
MIN. VERT.
SEPARATION
EXISTING WM
PROPOSED 2" PE
LPFM LATERAL (BORE
BENEATH ROAD)
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. LOW PRESSURE SECTION D
IRCDUS UCP #4101 OW & SMX7WA aWMW . LAW pLAAMG . aMROMMAL pDWW
1801 27TH STREET coIFMATIOl OF Aun1011 710N NW a09aeeae FORCE MAIN SYSTEM D-3
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TYPICAL DETAILS OF 6
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL772/770-9622 FAX772/770-9496 EMAILinfotMsbsenaineem.com
)a(o-L:L
BASIN ASSEMBLY
DRAWING
1FA 6"0 R RMA
AMRM
.. ,,,,,.... ....W..__Y
I (DUPLEX • EXTERNAL VALVE8)
[]CUSTOMER 11REJ[aTED
411
=cet
~�R
2€ z
�— /\
� T "
�
«a
I I
a i w_t I �1 drae.. F r -1m n.r«
�' � 1 . �'•��, "_.�__�`........
� . �•„�
(�
<:.474
�`
.,,. � ,.,
y�5� '�W .'.._19PRINGVIEYJ CtN1MH+LE IXZ3�E
,v.. I _T....
Yd2�.r' .Y. i.<%KYFtsa'zr OE@tJtY FLaiNM ydlt3
PH.{dMj 3s"3-77811 PFI. ,SO7J 93C3568'PN (d57)39C-bdg4
DUPLEX LIFT STATION
• Dt D
WITHIN LIMITS OF
i 1 -0 i �I V ��1 d"Ifj'•
DISTURBAVCE
TREES
IN R.O.W.
gft,._
PROPOSED LOW
PRESSURE
FORCE MAIN
SIMPLEX LIFT STATION
LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM TYPICAL SECTION
SCALE: 1' • to -0'
MAINTAIN FDEP
MIN. VERT.
SEPARATION
EXISTING WM
PROPOSED 2" PE
LPFM LATERAL (BORE
BENEATH ROAD)
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. LOW PRESSURE SECTION D
IRCDUS UCP #4101 OW & SMX7WA aWMW . LAW pLAAMG . aMROMMAL pDWW
1801 27TH STREET coIFMATIOl OF Aun1011 710N NW a09aeeae FORCE MAIN SYSTEM D-3
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TYPICAL DETAILS OF 6
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL772/770-9622 FAX772/770-9496 EMAILinfotMsbsenaineem.com
)a(o-L:L
SIMPLEX LIFT STATION
WITH CONTROL PANEL
SIMPLEX LIFT STATION
AND DISTRIBUTION PANEL
ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL
DISTRIBUTION PANEL DISTRIBUTION PANEL
' NOTE: PHOTOS TAKEN OF EXISTING IRCDUS SYSTEM
AT RIVER RUN SUB -DIVISION
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY I SCHULKE, BITTL.E & STODDARD, L.L.C. LOW PRESSURE SECTION D
IRCDUS UCP #4101 CML a STRUCT Rk Ehl"VMAC • LAND PLAeM" • FA6WINNEWAt PEA'41nAC FORCE MAIN SYSTEM D-4
1801 27TH STREET CEMOVAI p1i Or w 10FAZARM NO..
1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 SYSTEM PHOTOGRAPHS OF 6
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL772/770-9622 FAX7721770-9496 EMAIL infoiMsbsenaineem.mm
1a(o-G3
W41"38� "I ZR WA M69[[tZ IM
�.m.i mszc evnav 'Iav3e.oa3A
=mm. =a3AW Nvnra zui# W315AS 83M3S A1NnOJ a3Ala NVIONI !E E!
` '=,,y"' atvtma3a m�u3rvuoaNua Oulu orm avia33ti i�raru,vra�sr ww minssamd MOl 096Z£ tlO1a073 HOVOa3A
N—d'VnidBoN00 olt H1LZ Joel
'�'�"1 O2Jt/0Q01$ 8 3"Illlg 'n�I'1nFlOg 1014 M aon snooai s "
kb
MIa
-
S a
I • � wHill
D-tv 1,4
,.:
1".1
�.f
E
W41"38� "I ZR WA M69[[tZ IM
�.m.i mszc evnav 'Iav3e.oa3A
=mm. =a3AW Nvnra zui# W315AS 83M3S A1NnOJ a3Ala NVIONI !E E!
` '=,,y"' atvtma3a m�u3rvuoaNua Oulu orm avia33ti i�raru,vra�sr ww minssamd MOl 096Z£ tlO1a073 HOVOa3A
N—d'VnidBoN00 olt H1LZ Joel
'�'�"1 O2Jt/0Q01$ 8 3"Illlg 'n�I'1nFlOg 1014 M aon snooai s "
kb
MIa
-
S a
I • � wHill
D-tv 1,4
w�! ircwa ssesvu z zu ave zzssvet rzu i-
�3� m>Fzs voraoie 'Ir�vee oaan wz 3tins "anis aanla NYgNI ttu NVId A1Nf10� t13Aitl NVIONI i i � ago
�� awux>aee xi�rvvovuv3.,avrNr✓sta cam. avrae3Nrav3 xenrareus r zua W31SAS NOlinalN1S1O 096Zf tl0111013 HOV39 ON3n �d is s Qm
'°'"p `eL 13381S HI LZ 1091
'd?lO
bOOls 8311118'3111fiHOS 1dOlalO313 1010 M An St10081
'}; $•
�
�
C C 6 6 6 � ti 6 m a 6 f M
�
o
to
i
�51I
_ oY! lNW3 8fiY60tt ZU WA msau 1211la
L.. maze w�ov •�pv3e oa3A Boz 31ns `arae a3ARl uviow I", A1Hn01 7l3A18 M"a"' t
iD" 0962£ 101X013 'X1138 043A
..w e,r. T a«umr3e xW3wwOnuw) • swiuuvb mm• 9ub'33Nr9w3 Ab'NJrkl15 a Wbt1`JVIO 2I3S12i 1337!15 H1LZ LOBI
'421b440tg $ 311118 '31ilflH�g LOLL M eOn snaaai
XG. LG
04!I" 86C6'OLL /ZLL 1ltlf ub LttZLt}31
> W ria maze anruo'>j'I S Duan IW atns 'MIS a3M NVgM Lut A1Nnoo N3AIN NVIIINI a { v
suuxwa3d miu3w.voauu3 �wrun a�+w33Hbv >�n���4yes r kw waaOaio a3Sia 096Zf tlOtMOl3 4,,q 043A
a.., 13381S H1LZ 1091 �a o ap a � I
'60do01S B 3 -a -us '3>I'InHOS 1014 M a�n snaJal �e1e �: �+ yI. [
A6.47
��alw
wuc M3 3A MM"IS-0—AIS U3AW NVIW tt�Ll AiNnO83AIS NVIONI
INV89VIO 09624 VOOMIJ VVIO 083A
ON"WU ow - 6W13,00 wMillws * %lo
ANEO83SI8 IVOIN10313 1 133d1s HLZZ loolvcl(lols v Alills -DwinO
HOS LOLV # n SAa38l
"MAV.T.1 .(Im
a&.&?
SECTION E
EXISTING LIFT STATION AT
WABASSO BEACH
E-1 EXISTING LIFT STATION AT WABASSO BEACH
IaG.c.Q
EXISTING LIFT STATION PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"
EXISTING TYPICAL LIFT STATION
WITH GENERATOR
PROPOSED LOCATION FOR GENERATOR
AT EXISTING WABASSO BEACH LIFT STATION
SUMMERPLACE FEASIBILITY STUDY �SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. hETl
ON E
IRCDUS UCP #4101 cm 6 smut 1MAt EAYW'ffi%w • LAND PI4~ - fM lENfu PERmffw
EXISTING LIFT STATION1801 27TH STREET �""`"UOWBLVD , S ITE2 i1 VE M BACC,AT WABASSO BEACH1717 / 770- RIVER BLVD7 SUITE 949 EM BEACH, FLORIDA e..m 1
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA TEL 772/770-9622 FAX 7721770-9488 EMAIL inta�sbsengineers.wm
r a G . 70
Dylan Reingold County Attorney
William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney
Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney
Of ce of
INDIAN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney p�
FROM: Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorn WD
DATE: February 12, 2014
County Attorney Matters — B. C. C 02.18.14
RIVER COUNTY
.ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: Permission to File Suit for an Injunction against Persistent Code Violator
BACKGROUND.
William Ruetemann is the owner of a single family residence located at 8130 134th Street, Sebastian, Indian
River County, Florida. Mr. Ruetemann purchased the home in 2007. Mr. Ruetemann's property is zoned
RS -3, Single Family Residential District and it is currently his homestead.
On September 28, 2010, Mr. Ruetemann obtained a home occupation zoning permit to conduct a mobile
repair business out of this home. The permit was specifically limited to telephone services, office work,
and/or for address purposes only. However, on January 23, 2012, the Indian River County Code
Enforcement Board (the "Board") conducted a hearing and determined that Mr. Ruetemann was operating
an unauthorized boat repair and painting business from his residential home. The Board also found that Mr.
Ruetemann was storing boats on his property that were not registered to the property owner in violation of
Indian River County's Code of Ordinances ("the Code"). The Board directed Mr. Ruetemann to take
corrective action.
On September 24, 2012, the Board held a hearing concerning the construction of an unauthorized pole barn
as well as storing boats on his property in violation of Indian River County's Code of Ordinances.
Consequently, the Board fined Mr. Ruetemann $100.00 for the stored boats.
Approved for February 18, 2014 B. CC Meeting
County Attorney's Agenda
County Attorney
INDIAN RIVER CO. APPR VED DATE
Administration W AWN/
County Attorne
Budget 2
Department /
Risk Management ...
127
Board of County Commissioners
February 12, 2014
Page 2 of 2
On March 25, 2013, the Board conducted another hearing concerning an unauthorized boat repair
business. The Board determined that Mr. Ruetemann did not comply with the Board's order dated
January 23, 2012. Consequently, the Board fined Mr. Ruetemann a total of $500.00 ($100.00 for
each of the five days that the County Code Inspector witnessed the violation).
On August 26, 2013, the Board conducted yet another hearing concerning a boat that was being
stored on Mr. Ruetemann's property. The County confirmed that the boat was not registered to Mr.
Ruetemann and that it was on the property to be repaired. The Board determined that Mr. Ruetemann
did not comply with the Board's order dated January 23, 2012. Consequently, the Board fined Mr.
Ruetemann a total of $2,000.00 for the eight days that the boat was stored on his property in violation
of the Code.
As of September 30, 2013, Mr. Ruetemann cancelled his home occupation zoning permit. However,
according to Betty Davis, the County Code Inspector, Charles Vogt, an Environmental Specialist
from the Florida Department of Health, and numerous neighbors, Mr. Ruetemann has not
discontinued his unauthorized boat repair business. Neighbors have consistently complained that Mr.
Reutemann's boat repair activities create excessive noise and odor. On February 7, 2014, the
Department of Health issued a letter to Mr. Ruetemann stating that he was in violation of a number of
state and local laws including, but not limited to, Chapter 85-427, Special Acts, Laws of Florida, and
Indian River County Ordinance No. 91-22. The letter directs Mr. Ruetemann to immediately cease
and desist all boat repair operations on his property until he obtains the necessary permits to conduct
such a business. However, on February 12, 2014, the County confirmed that Mr. Ruetemann has
chosen to continue his unauthorized boat repair business and is storing boats on his property in
violation of the Code. Moreover, Mr. Ruetemann has resorted to methods of intimidation towards his
neighbors so that they will not report his actions to the County. A number of the citizens who live
near Mr. Ruetemann are now anxious and/or frightened.
FUNDING.
Funding for any costs associated with a suit (approximately $500) is budgeted and available from the
MSTU Fund/Code Enforcement/Other Professional Services -Account #00420704-033190.
RECOMMENDATION.
Due to the continuing nature of the boat repair operations, despite numerous orders and notices and
the potential for environmental harm, the County Attorney's Office recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners authorize the County Attorney's Office to file suit in circuit court for
injunctive relief asking the court to force Mr. Ruetemann to cease and desist the unauthorized boat
repair business and to stop storing boats on his property that are not registered to him.
128
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney
Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney
County Attorney Matters - B. C.C. 02.18.2014
Of_ fi`ce Of
INDIAN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
4
DATE: February 11, 2014
RIVER, COUNTY
ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: Indian River Lagoon Counties Collaborative — Proposed Interlocal Agreement
BACKGROUND.
On November 12, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners (the "Board") authorized the County
Attorney's Office to assist Commissioner O'Bryan and the Indian River Lagoon Counties Collaborative (the
"Collaborative") in drafting bylaws and a document formally recognizing the Collaborative with such
document containing a sunset provision. The County Attorney's Office drafted the bylaws and an interlocal
agreement and presented those documents to the Collaborative on December 20, 2013. At that meeting, the
Collaborative voted to amend the proposed documents. Pursuant to the vote, the County Attorney's Office
revised the bylaws and the interlocal agreement. The revised bylaws and interlocal agreement were
approved by the Collaborative on February 7, 2014. The County Attorney's Office now presents the
interlocal agreement to the Board for approval. The interlocal agreement will also be presented to the
governing bodies of the various other Collaborative members for approval.
FU_
The only cost associated with this matter is the recording fee which is estimated to be $92.50. Funds are
available from General Fund/County Attorney/ Recording Fees- Account No. 00110214-034830.
Approved for February 18, 2014 B. CC. Meeting
County Attorney's Agenda
unty Attorney
F.•W 11—y1Li. 1GENFR4LIB CCWgenda Af—s1J 4an River Lagoon Collaborative (7LA).doc
INDIAN RIVER CO. APPROVED DATE
Administration e i
Risk Management
129
Board of County Commissioners
February 11, 2014
Page 2 of 2
RECOMMENDATION.
The County Attorney's Office recommends that the Board approve or disapprove the attached interlocal
agreement with the various other county members of the Indian River Lagoon Counties Collaborative and,
if the interlocal agreement is approved, authorize the Chairman to sign it on behalf of the Board.
ATTACHMENT(S).
Proposed Interlocal Agreement for Creation of the Indian River Lagoon Counties
Collaborative
DTR:LAC
Attachment as noted above
r.'W11—yTW.1GENEH4L0 C CW9e0da Alflm—Vn&- M— Lagoon Co11.b—fi. (1L4).d-
130
Record and return to:
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR CREATION OF THE
INDIAN RIVER LAGOON COUNTIES COLLABORATIVE
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this day
of , 2014, by and between VOLUSIA COUNTY, BREVARD COUNTY, INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, and MARTIN COUNTY (the "Member Counties").
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Indian River Lagoon (the "Lagoon") is a diverse, shallow -water estuary stretching
from Volusia County to Palm Beach County, constituting roughly 40 percent of Florida's east coast; and
WHEREAS, the Lagoon is an important commercial and recreational fishery and economic
resource to the state and region. The total estimated annual economic value of the lagoon is $3.7 billion,
supporting 15,000 full and part-time jobs and providing recreational opportunities for 11 million people per
year; and
WHEREAS, the Lagoon is at a point of ecological crisis. The coming months could bring a slow
recovery to this unique ecosystem or be witness to the collapse of the remaining portion of the estuary that
has been sustainable up to this point; and
WHEREAS, the County Council of Volusia County and the Board of County Commissioners of
Brevard County, Indian River County, St. Lucie County, and Martin County wish to enter into this
Agreement in order to coordinate efforts to protect the Lagoon; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned parties have determined that this Agreement is consistent with the
requirements of Section 163.01, Florida Statutes.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises, and representation
herein, the parties desiring to be legally bound, do agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
RECITALS; DEFINITIONS
Section 1.01. Recitals. Each and all of the foregoing recitals be and the same hereby incorporated
herein and acknowledged to be true and correct to the best of the parties' knowledge. Failure of any of the
foregoing recitals to be true and correct shall not operate to invalidate this Agreement.
F.�l4TTORNUVND.11GENERgLVMTMOCALR0REEMEMMRL IM 2.6.2014.DX Page I of 10
131
ARTICLE 2
PURPOSE
Section 2.01. General purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish the INDIAN
RIVER LAGOON COUNTIES COLLABORATIVE (the "Collaborative") to provide the general public,
the St. Johns River and South Florida Water Management Districts, the United States Army Corps of
Engineers, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary
Program, the United States Department of Interior, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the Florida Legislature, the Member Counties and
various stakeholder interests and Not for Profit organizations with a local government multi -county work
group that will present a variety of issues dealing with the health and welfare of the Indian River Lagoon,
and the watersheds draining into and the bodies of water connected to the Lagoon.
The Collaborative will strive to advance cooperative opportunities to address issues harming the
water quality of the Lagoon, to propose solutions, and to request supportive legislation to facilitate the
unified remedial actions the Member Counties have chosen to take.
ARTICLE 3
COLLABORATIVE ORGANIZATION AND CREATION
Section 3.01. Establishment of Collaborative. The Collaborative is hereby created and
established pursuant to the Agreement to carry out the purposes and functions set forth in Articles 2 and 5.
The legal name of the Collaborative shall be the Indian River Lagoon Counties Collaborative
Section 3.02. Collaborative to operate pursuant to law. In the event that any election,
referendum, approval, permit, notice, other proceeding or authorization is required under applicable law to
undertake any power, duty, or responsibility hereunder, or to observe, assume, or carry out any of the
provisions of this Agreement, the Collaborative will, to the extent of its legal capacity, comply with all
applicable laws and requirements.
Section 3.03. Governing board to act as policy-making body of the Collaborative. The
governing board established pursuant to Section 4.01 of this Agreement shall be the policy-making body
forum of the Collaborative responsible for cooperative decision-making of actions taken by the
Collaborative.
Section 3.04. Submission of proceedings; Contracts and other documents. Subject to the right
to claim an exemption from the Florida Public Records Law, Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, the parties shall
submit to each other such data, reports, records, contracts, and other documents relating to the
Collaborative as is requested with charges to be in accordance with Chapter 119, Florida Statutes.
ARTICLE 4
COMPOSITION; MEMBERSHIP; TERMS OF OFFICE
Section 4.01. Composition and membership of governing board.
(a) The membership of the Collaborative shall consist of five (5) voting representatives,
one representative from each of the Member Counties.
F: L9"OPS£rtUMUCEN£RALVNTERLOCALAGR£ENENMRL ILA 2-&201# DOC
Page 2 of 10
132
Volusia County (1)
Brevard County (1)
Indian River County (1)
St. Lucie County (1)
Martin County (1)
(b) Each voting representative shall be an elected member from the governing board of
each county.
Section 4.02. Terms. The term of office of the members of the Collaborative shall be one (1)
year. The membership of a member who is a public official automatically terminates upon said official
leaving the elective office for any reason, or may be terminated by a majority vote of the total membership
of the governmental entity represented by the member. A vacancy shall be filled by the original appointing
entity.
ARTICLE 5
AUTHORITIES, POWERS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Section 5.01. General authority. With a supermajority vote the Collaborative shall have the
authority to propose those actions and functions consistent with the purposes set forth in Article 2. In
furtherance of this general authority, the Collaborative may propose rules to be adopted by Member
Counties which would effectuate the powers, responsibilities, and obligations enumerated herein; provided,
that said rules do not supersede or conflict with applicable local and state laws, rules and regulations.
ARTICLE 6
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISION
Section 6.01. Constitutional or statutory duties and responsibilities of parties. This
Agreement shall not be construed to authorize the delegation of the constitutional or statutory duties of any
of the parties. In addition, this Agreement does not relieve any of the parties of an obligation or
responsibility imposed upon them by law, except to the extent of actlual and timely performance thereof by
one or more of the parties to this Agreement or any legal or administrative entity created or authorized by
this Agreement, in which case this performance may be offered in satisfaction of the obligation or
responsibility.
Section 6.02. Amendment of Agreement. Amendments or modifications of this Agreement may
only be made by written agreement signed by all parties here to with the same formalities as the original
Agreement.
Section 6.03. Duration; withdrawal procedure.
(a) Duration. Termination. This Agreement shall remain in effect until December 31,
2016, unless further action by each party is taken to reenact same. This Agreement may be terminated at
any time.
(b) Withdrawal procedure. Any party may withdraw from this Agreement after
presenting in written form a notice of intent to withdraw to the other parties to this Agreement and the
FWD,MEnUND,4,GE,VERALVMER,.aALAGREEA,EATS,R.ILA z_6-za1J.DOC Page 3 of 10
133
Collaborative, at least ninety (90) days prior to the intended date of withdrawal. Upon receipt of the
intended notice of withdrawal:
(1) Notification of the withdrawal is to be presented at the next meeting of the
Collaborative. The Collaborative shall execute a memorandum reflecting the withdrawal of the member
and an alteration of the list of member governments that are signatories to this Agreement. The
memorandum shall be filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of each county in which a party
hereto is located.
Section 6.04. Notices. All notices, demands and correspondence required or provided for under
this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or dispatched by certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested. Notice required to be given shall be addressed as follows:
Volusia County
County Council
Thomas C. Kelly Administration Center
123 W. Indiana Ave.
DeLand, FL 32720
Brevard County
Board of County Commissioners
2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way
Viera, FL 32940
Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners
1801 27`x' Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
St. Lucie County
Board of County Commissioners
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Martin County
Board of County Commissioners
Martin County Administrative Center
2401 SE Monterey Road
Stuart, FL 34996
A party may unilaterally change its address or addressee by giving notice in writing to the other parties as
provided in this section. Thereafter, notices and other pertinent correspondence shall be addressed and
transmitted to the new address.
Section 6.05. Interpretation.
(a) Drafters of Agreement. The members of the Collaborative were each represented
by or afforded the opportunity for representation by legal counsel and participated in the drafting of this
F'I477ORNEJVJNDACFJVER9LVMFRLOCALAGREEVENTSVRL/1AI-&2014.DOC Page 4 of 10
134
Agreement and in choice of wording. Consequently, no provision hereof should be more strongly
construed against any party as drafter of this Agreement.
(b) Severability. Invalidation of any one of the provisions of this Agreement or any
part, clause or word hereof, or the application thereof in specific circumstances, by judgment, court order,
or administrative hearing or order shall not affect any other provisions or applications in other
circumstances, all of which shall remain in full force and effect; provided, that such remainder would then
continue to conform to the terms and requirements of applicable law.
(c) Rules of Construction. In interpreting this Agreement, the following rules of
construction shall apply unless the context indicates otherwise:
(1) The singular of any word or term includes the plural;
(2) The masculine gender includes the feminine gender; and
(3) The word "shall" is mandatory, and "may" is permissive.
(d) Obligations and Responsibilities:
(1) This Agreement is a voluntary accord entered into by sovereign, separate
County governments for the purpose of considering possible cooperative acts to enhance and protect water
quality and quantity of the Indian River Lagoon.
(2) This Agreement does not cause any member to incur any duty, obligation or
responsibility. Any actions to be taken are voluntary.
Section 6.06. Enforcement by parties hereto. In the event of any judicial or administrative
action to enforce or interpret this Agreement by any party hereto, each party shall bear its own attorney's
fees in connection with such proceeding. This Agreement makes no provision for enforcement of any
nature.
Section 6.07. Agreement execution; Use of counterpart signature pages. This Agreement, and
any amendments hereto, may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which so
executed shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.
Section 6.08. Effective date: Cost of recordation.
(a) Effective date. This Agreement shall become effective upon its filing in the Office
of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of each county in which a party hereto is located. Any amendment hereto
shall become effective only upon its filing in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court for each county in
which a party hereto is located.
(b) Recordation. Each County shall hereby agree to pay for any costs of recordation or
filing of this Agreement in the Office of the Circuit Court in each respective county. The recorded or filed
original hereof, or any amendment, shall be returned to the Collaborative for filing in its records.
F:uTWWEWNDAIGFN&R4LVNrM0C4L AG" M-PNMRL,U 2-&.'614.UDC Page 5 of 10
135
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Agreement on behalf of the
referenced legal entities and hereby establish the above designated Collaborative.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the
presence of:
Attest:
Deputy Clerk
VOLUSIA COUNTY
COUNTY COUNCIL
0
Jason P. Davis, Chairman
Approval Date:
[the remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
F.'14"EYU,VD41CENERALVATERLOCALRGREENEMSVRL ILA 1-6201tD0C
Page 6 of 10
136
Attest: Scott Ellis, Clerk of Circuit
Court
L912
Deputy Clerk
BREVARD COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Mary Bolin Lewis, Chairman
Approval Date:
[the remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
F..-UrMIWEfUNDA6ENERALVNTERLGCAL AGREFAIEKISVRL ILA 2-62070. DOC
Page 7 of 10
137
Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of
Circuit Court and Comptroller
IM
Deputy Clerk
Approved: ,1
'a-
_
oseph . Baird, Administrator
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman
Approval Date:
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney
[the remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
FL4nVkVEYU ,VDACF,VERALVM'ERLOCAL AC.REEMEWSVRL 1L4 1.&2014.DOC
Page 8 of IO
138
Attest: Joseph E. Smith, Clerk of
Circuit Court
Deputy Clerk
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Frannie Hutchinson, Chairman
Approval Date:
[the remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
F UT7'ORNEnUNDA1GENERALVNTERLOCAL AGREEMENMRL !LA 2-&201 J. DOC
Page 9 of 10
139
Attest: Carolyn Timmann, Clerk of
Circuit Court and Comptroller
Deputy Clerk
MARTIN COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Sarah Heard, Chairman
Approval Date:
[the remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
F: IATTORNEYU,VLAIGENERALVNTERLOCAL AGREEAIENTSVRL ILA 2-6-2014.DOC
Page 10 of 10
140
BCC AGENDA
February 18, 2014
ITEM 14.D(1)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: February 10, 2014
SUBJECT: Sebastian Equalization Fee
FROM: Commissioner Bob Solari
Long before any of the present Commissioners were serving on the IRC BCC,
Sebastian had a small water and sewer utility system. The County bought this
small system out in 1995, consolidating in into the larger County system.
Because some of the Sebastian system's debt was assumed, the County
apparently began billing Sebastian customers an "Equalization Charge." At the
time, the charge may well have been appropriate.
Now, many years later the County still charges this fee, which goes to the County
general fund.
It has been suggested that all has been equalized between the County and the
Sebastian customers, that the "Equalization Charge" is no longer just, and that it
is time to end the fee.
It has been noted that at the time that the charge was initially imposed, the
Sebastian system had approximately 864 accounts. Today the County Sewer
and Water system has approximately 11,425 Sebastian customers. I cannot
understand why the 10,561 new Sebastian area accounts should be treated any
differently than any accounts in the unincorporated areas of the County.
141
I will note that the new Sebastian customers have paid their ERU fees and, like
other County customers, are paying for capital costs, renewal and replacement
costs and operating costs, as part of their monthly water and sewer charge, that
is, these costs are embedded in utilities rate structure.
Further, while the County utility system assumed debt when it took over the
Sebastian system, I do not understand why the 10,561 new customers should be
any more responsible for the debt than any other utility customer who happens to
live in the unincorporated area of the County.
It should be noted that the "Equalization Charge " is paid into the County's
general fund and not the Sewer and Water Utility, so in essence, the charge has
nothing to do with the purchase of the Sebastian utility by the County enterprise
fund.
I do not doubt that the County has the power to continue placing the
"Equalization Charge" on the bills of our Sebastian customers. The proper
question though is, do we have the right to do so; is it the just thing to do? The
answer may depend on the individual's view of the function of government. If
one's view is that the institution of government ought to be supported, protected
and entrenched, then one might consider the continuation of the "Equalization
Charge" consistent with good government. If, however, one believes that the
primary purpose of government is to serve the people of our community, which
believe is the view elected officials ought to hold, then I can find no justification
for the continuation of the Sebastian "Equalization Charge".
After we have discussed this matter at the next BCC meeting, I am hoping that
the Board will agree.
Thank you.
142
BCC AGENDA
February 18, 2014
ITEM 14.1)(2)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: February 11, 2014
SUBJECT: Gifford Economics Development Council Inc. (GEDC)
FROM: Commissioner Bob Solari
At the February 11, 2014 meeting of the BCC Min. William Mosley spoke. During
the course of the discussion I set up an appointment to meet with him and
discuss the GEDC with him at the offices of the GEDC the next day at 2:00pm.
Chairman O'Bryan asked that I report back to the BCC. This will be that report.
Attached is a list of questions that I brought to the GEDC meeting. I thought that
it would be reasonable to ask some basic financial and organization questions of
the GEDC leadership. In addition, as the GEDC is a non-profit, I thought that it
would be appropriate to ask the GEDC questions similar to those that we would
ask any non-profit that sought financial support from the County government.
Jason Brown helped with the formulation of some of the questions
Thank you.
143
Gifford Economics Development Council Inc.
Questions for 2-12-14 meeting with Min. William Mosley
How long has the Gifford Economics Development Council Inc. (GEDC) been in
continuous operation?
May I please have a copy of your mission statement?
How many paid members does the GEDC currently have?
May I have a copy of the literature that you have available for some of the programs
that you have listed in your brochure:
1. Low income housing
2. Job training
3. Community networking
4. Self-employment
5. Bringing more Businesses to Gifford
6. Youth employment opportunities?
With what banks do you have a relationship for your Micro -Lending and Revolving
Loan Fund?
Where is your Enterprise Center located?
May I please have a copy of your "Letter of Determination" from the IRS and your
Federal ID number documenting your non-profit status?
Copy of letter from the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services verifying
that your agency has complied with the registration requirements of Chapter 496
Florida Statutes, the solicitation of contributions act? (This is needed when
requesting money form a governmental agency.)
May I have a copy of the GEDC financial statements?
List of your board of directors?
May I please have a copy of by-laws?
Copy of your latest tax return, form 990?
144
February 18, 2014
ITEM 14.E.1
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners
DATE: February 10, 2014
SUBJECT: Florida Municipal Power Agency Meetings
FROM: Tim Zorc
Commissioner, District 3
would like to request discussion on the Florida Municipal Power Agency
Meetings in Orlando, Florida.
145
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
BOARD MEMORANDUM
Date: February February 10, 2014
To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator
From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services t\111'
Prepared By: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District .
Subject: Final Pay to Geosyntec for Work Order No. 8 for Construction Quality
Assurance Services for the Rain Flap Removal Project
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS:
On November 12, 2013, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Board approved Work Order No.
8 to Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) to provide Construction Quality Assuarance Services for
the Rain Flap Removal Project in the amount of $3,985.00.
ANALYSIS:
Geosyntec has satisfactorily completed all the assignments described in the scope of work for a
total invoiced amount, including the final invoice of $460.49. After final payment, the total amount
paid to Geosyntec will be at the cost of $3,982.76 which is under budget. Attached is Geosyntec's
letter report describing in more details the services provided under this work order.
FUNDING:
Funding for the Rain Flap Removal project is budgeted and available in the Segment 3 Landfill
lateral expansion account which is funded from SWDD assessments and user fees.
ACCOUNT NO.:
Description
Account Number
I Amount
Segment 3 Landfill Lateral Expansion - Rain Flap Removal
411-169000-10009
$460.49
RECOMMENDATION:
SWDD staff recommends that its Board approve Geosynte's final invoice amount of $460.49.
ATTACHMENT(s):
1. Geosyntec Project Completion Report & Final Invoice
SWDD Agenda - Final Pay Geosyntec WO No 8
Page 1 of 2
146
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
By I
Jose h A. Baird, County Administrator
Fo :
Date
SWDD Agenda - Final Pay Geosyntec WO No 8
Indian River Co.
AQ roved
Date
Administration
f� f
Legal
Budget
SWDD
C i
1t
-\0
SWDD -Finance
Page 2 of 2
147
Geosyntect'
Consultants
Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E.
Managing Director
Solid Waste Disposal District
Indian River County
1325 74th Avenue Southwest
Vero Beach, Florida 32968
1200 Riverplace Blvd., Suite 710
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
Fx 904 858.1818
FAX 904396.1143
www.geosyntec.com
24 January 2014
Subject: Project Management Report and Transmittal of Invoice No. 12144009
IRC — Rain Flap Removal Project
Indian River County Landfill Facility
Dear Mr. Mehta:
Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) prepared this project management report to address the
Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) services for the removal of the temporary diversion berm and
rain flap of Cell 1 — Segment 3 Expansion of the Class I landfill at the Indian River County (IRC)
landfill facility. This report presents: (i) a budget overview for this project; (ii) a summary of
activities completed to date; (iii) a discussion of the work reflected on the enclosed invoice; (iv) a
discussion of ongoing work; and (v) recommended actions for the site. The enclosed invoice, which
is the final invoice for this project, reflects work that was performed through 19 January 2013.
Table 1 provides invoicing detail for the project.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARIES
Geosyntec's Project No. FL2291: Rain Flan Removal Project - Indian River County Landfill
Facility (IRC Work Authorization No. 8)
Budget Overpiew
Invoice No. 12144009 (enclosed) dated 23 January 2014 for $460.49 is the 2nd (and final) invoice for
Project No. FL2291. Listed below is a summary of the budget, including invoiced amount and
remaining budget.
Approved Budget:
$ 3,985.00
Invoiced Amount:
$ 3,982.76
Remaining Budget
$ 2.24
Geosyntec is within the budget appropriated for this project.
FL2291-01 \J L 14007. doc
eit;inffiS I ;sriPnists I inonvat'<<1m
148
Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E.
24 January 2014
Page 2
WORK COMPLETED TO DATE
The tasks performed under this invoice include review of invoice submitted by Republic Services,
Inc. (RSI) and its subcontractor American Environmental Group, Ltd. (AEG), project completion
report preparation, and project management, including invoicing.
WORK REFLECTED ON ENCLOSED INVOICE
Labor reflected on the enclosed invoice is mainly attributed to the following:
• Labor indicated as professional services ($447.08) is associated with review of invoice
submitted by RSI and its subcontractor AEG, project completion report preparation, and
project management.
• Other expenses are associated with communications fee ($13.41).
ONGOING WORK
The work for this project is complete. A project completion report is included with this invoice
transmittal.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
None
CLOSURE
Geosyntec appreciates the opportunity to provide services to Indian River County. If you have any
questions regarding this correspondence, please feel free to contact me at 904.858.1818.
Sincerely,
NYY�Aj
Ramil Mijares, Ph.D.
Senior Staff Engineer
Enclosure — Invoice No. 12144009
FL2291-01 UL I4007.doc
eugmeem I scierfMS I wmvrdam
149
Table 1
Summary of Invoices Submitted for Geosyntec's Project Number FL2291
IRC — Rain Flap Removal Project
Geosyntec Project
NumberAIRC Work
Authorization Number
Invoice No.
Invoice Date
Amount
FL2291/8
12144005
01/15/2014
$3,522.27
12144009
01/23/2014
$460.49
TOTAL
$3,982.76
FL2291-01 UL 14007.doc
mginm-m ! b"ealtis2s 1 iratJtxatis
150
� Geosyntec �
consultants
PLEASE REMIT PAYMENT TO:
Geosyntee Consultants
900 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 200
Boca Raton, Florida 33487-2775 USA
Tel (561) 995-0900 Fax (561) 995-0925
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Invoice #:
12144009
1325 74TH AVENUE, S.W.
Invoice Date:
1/23/2014
Billed To Date
Project:
FL2291
VERO BEACH, FL 32968
Project Name:
IRC RAIN FLAP REMOVAL
Attention: HIMANSHU MEHTA
PROJECT
For Professional Services Rendered through transaction date: 1/19/2014
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS INVOICE, PLEASE CONTACT DR. RAMIL WARES AT (904) 858-1818.
Statement
$3,985.00
Prior Billings
$3,522.27
Current Invoice
$460.49
Billed To Date
$3,982.76
Paid To Date
$0.00
Professional Services
$447.08
3.0% Communication Fee $13.41
------------------
Current Invoice $460.49
"Amount Due This Invoice "*
$460.49
Project Budget
$3,985.00
Expended to Date
$3,982.76
Contract Balance
$2.24
"Amount Due This Invoice ""
$460.49
151
Project: FL2291 -- IRC RAIN FLAP REMOVAL PROJECT
Invoice #:12144009
(liiiiae Phase: 01) CQA SERVICES
Class / Employee Name Date
Hours
Rate
Amount
SENIOR STAFF PROFESSIONAL
JOSHI, RUTU 01/14/2014
0.50
81.57
40.79
01/15/2014
1.00
81.57
81.57
01/16/2014
2.00
81.57
163.14
WARES, RAMIL 01/14/2014
0.50
81.57
40.79
01/16/2014
0.50
81.57
40.79
Total: SENIOR STAFF PROFESSIONAL
4.50
367.08
ASSOCIATE
BADU-TWENEBOAH, KWASI 01/16/2014
0.50
160.00
80.00
Total Phase: 01) CQA SERVICES
Phase Labor
447.08
3.0% Communication Fee
13.41
Total Project Labor
447.08
3.0% Communication Fee
13.41
Total Project: FL2291 -- IRC RAIN FLAP REMOVAL
PROJECT
460.49
INCPMGEOPH Page 1
152
GeospteO`
consultants
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E.
Managing Director
Solid Waste Disposal District
Indian River County
1325 74th Avenue Southwest
Vero Beach, Florida 32968
Subject: Project Completion Report
Construction Quality Assurance Services
East-West Rain Flap Removal Project
IRC Work Authorization No. 8
Indian River County Landfill Facility
Vero Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Mehta:
INTRODUCTION
1200 Riveplace Blvd, Suite 710
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
PH 904.858.1818
FAX 904.396.1143
www.geosyntee.com
24 January 2014
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) is pleased to present to you this project completion
report for Geosyntec Project No. FL2291 - Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Services for
the Class I Landfill at the Indian River County Landfill (IRCL) facility in Vero Beach, Indian
River County, Florida. This project was performed under Work Order No. 8, authorized on
November 12, 2013, pursuant to the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services
between Indian River County, Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) and Geosyntec, dated 15
November 2011. This report has been prepared as a supplement to our final invoice
No. 12144009, dated 23 January 2014.
The scope of work authorized under Work Order No. 8 consisted of provision of CQA
monitoring services for the East-West Rain Flap Removal (Project). Details and documentation
of the CQA services provided by Geosyntec were presented in the "Final Construction Quality
Assurance Report" (CQA Report) submitted to SWDD and dated 10 December 2013. The
following is a summary of the work that Geosyntec performed under this work order.
JL14008 FL2291 WO #8 Project Completion Report
153
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E.
24 January 2014
Page 2
The CQA monitoring and documentation activities were performed during the period of 4 to 7
December 2013. During this period, CQA personnel (with support from SWDD personnel)
monitored the following activities:
• removal of the temporary diversion berm and rain flap;
* connection of the primary geocomposite drainage layer, LCS pipe and bedding gravel
within the leachate corridor; and
• placement and grading of liner protective layer sand over the rain flap removal area.
During construction of the above, CQA personnel verified that the installation met or exceeded
the requirements of the Project Documents. The results of the CQA activities undertaken by
Geosyntec as described in the CQA Report indicate that the Project was constructed in general
accordance with the Project Documents and the solid waste permit issued for the IRCL facility.
BUDGET
The approved budget for Work Order No. 8 was $3,985.00. The total invoiced amount,
including the final invoice is $3,982.76. Therefore, Geosyntec completed this project within the
approved budget.
4 1 i
Geosyntec appreciates the opportunity to provide services to Indian River County. If you have
any question regarding this correspondence, please feel free to contact either of the undersigned
at (904) 858-1818.
Sincerely,
on
Rutuparna Joshi, E.I.
Senior Staff Engineer
Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate
JL14008_FL2291 WO fl—Project Completion Report
154
GeosyntecO
consuItants
PLEASE REMIT PAYMENT TO.
Geosyntec consultants
900 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 200
Boca Raton, Florida 33487-2775 USA
Tel (561) 995-0900 Fax(561)995-0925
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
Invoice #:
12144009
Invoice Date:
1/23/2014
1325 74TH AVENUE, S.W.
Project:
FL2291
$460.49
Project Name:
IRC RAIN FLAP REMOVAL
VERO BEACH, FL 32968
$3,982.76
PROJECT
Attention: HIMANSHU MEHTA
Paid To Date
$0.00
For Professional Services Rendered through transaction date: 1/1912014
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS INVOICE, PLEASE CONTACT DR. RAMIL WARES AT (904) 858-1818.
Professional Services
3.0% Communication Fee
Current Invoice
"Amount Due This Invoice ""
$447.08
$13.41
------------------
$460.49
$460.49
Statement
Prior Billings
$3,522.27
Project Budget
$3,985.00
Current Invoice
$460.49
Expended to Date
$3,982.78
Billed To Date
$3,982.76
Contract Balance
$2.24
Paid To Date
$0.00
"Amount Due This Invoice **
$460,49
Solid Waste Disposal District (SVv DD)
Acct.#
Director
155
Glass /Employee Name
Date
Hours
Rate
Amount
SENIOR STAFF PROFESSIONAL
JOSHI, RUTU
01/14/2014
0.50
81.57
40.79
01/15/2014
1.00
81.57
81.57
01/16/2014
2.00
81.57
163.14
WARES, RAMIL
01/14/2014
0.50
81.57
40.79
01/16/2014
0.50
81.57
40.79
Total: SENIOR STAFF PROFESSIONAL
4.50
367.08
ASSOCIATE
BADU-TWENEBOAH, KWASI
01/16/2014
0.50
160.00
80.00
Total Phase : 01) CQA SERVICES
Phase Labor
447.08
3.0% Communication Fee
13.41
Total Project Labor
447.08
3.0% Communication Fee
13.41
Total Project:
FL2291 -- IRC RAIN FLAP REMOVAL
PROJECT
460.49
INCPMGEOPH Page 1
156
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
BOARD MEMORANDUM
Dates- November 04, 2013
To: Joseph A. Baird;, t6uht: Adm n I " Ift - t or I
p y.:,, ra
Orom.- Vincent Burke, P.E ZIr6 d.Qr",0'fPtIlItVSe,rvlces:,
Prepared By: Himanthii N. Meht-
a,:P,E. a'h4ging-DirectorSolld Waste Disposal District
Subject: Work Order: No��','g to: diosy
iec for tOnstraction Services for the Rain Flap
Removal Project
DESCRIMONS AND CON MONS:
On march 19, 201'3,,the Sblfd° Mae MAd—salD'istliir# (SIIVDD`j Board; approved to
a 1) payment n
C011liX1V 0 E0v M Mal CAMON n (tomanco) ,for the Phase 2 .construction- of Cell: :1 of
Segment 1 -Expansion In accordance wit4i Bid pa 1, .
oft�j!� p rq4�,, , a
Pt In Map,� or,
a tp.%Pprary II:ne
r feature was constructed to "bise=ct the 10 -arcre tell in lytif to t ut!6 the
genentim of jle'c
Uft,"bli.CServices) filedhas
t400 SO o Po0
X11
er,
tatikfiapisrea toe
D&Ve,
q -n
el;.araie authorizatlowtv,
le -evvices.
q,number 11 :.and .i 6v
ON Mwk-
accordance wlthfDEkf
AML—YSIS.-
Mzvr-qt�,
FUNDING:
tom
ACCi3UNT NO.:
Description
Acco,
�u
rn.p,,Ilt 3 Land -
III Lateral Expansion - Rain Flap
R�pioVaj
SWDD,A,g,ehda - ftrkordir No 8Vto deosynte.c for Cgnstty tipn SerYkes'Rotn-flap Removal Protect Page 1 of 2
19
157
'MIA4
Administrator
SWDMAgenda - Work ,order ,,No- 8 to Seosyntec for colittruttl6h s6NIdiij Page 2 of 2
158
Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E.
Managing Director
Solid Waste Disposal District
Indian River County
1325 74th Avenue Southwest
Vero Beach, Florida 32968
1200 Riverplace Blvd., Suite 710
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
FH 904 858.1818
FAx 904.396.1143
www.geosyntec.com
24 January 2014
Subject: Project Management Report and Transmittal of Invoice No. 12144009
IRC — Rain Flap Removal Project
Indian River County Landfill Facility
Dear Mr. Mehta:
Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) prepared this project management report to address the
Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) services for the removal of the temporary diversion berm and
rain flap of Cell I — Segment 3 Expansion of the Class I landfill at the Indian River County (IRC)
landfill facility. This report presents: (i) a budget overview for this project; (ii) a summary of
activities completed 'to date; (iii) a discussion of the work reflected on the enclosed invoice; (iv) a
discussion of ongoing work; and (v) recommended actions for the site. The enclosed invoice, which
is the final invoice for this project, reflects work that was performed through 19 January 2013.
Table 1 provides invoicing detail for the project.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARIES
Geosvntec's Project No. FL2291: Rain Flap Removal Project - Indian River County Landfill
Facility (IRC Work Authorization No. 8)
Budget Overview
Invoice No. 12144009 (enclosed) dated 23 January 2014 for $460.49 is the 2nd (and final) invoice for
Project No. FL2291. Listed below is a summary of the budget, including invoiced amount and
remaining budget.
Approved Budget: $ 3,985.00
Invoiced Amount: $ 3,982.76
Remaining Budget $ 2.24
Geosyntec is within the budget appropriated for this project.
FL2291-01 UL 14007. doc
P,{1�i#E;S 1 :4th?ttfii+:3� I �ii>r?t34liJ1fit;S
159
Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E.
24 January 2014
Page 2
WORK COMPLETED TO DATE
The tasks performed under this invoice include review of invoice submitted by Republic Services,
Inc. (RSI) and its subcontractor American Environmental Group, Ltd. (AEG), project completion
report preparation, and project management, including invoicing.
WORK REFLECTED ON ENCLOSED INVOICE
Labor reflected on the enclosed invoice is mainly attributed to the following:
• Labor indicated as professional services ($447.08) is associated with review of invoice
submitted by RSI and its subcontractor AEG, project completion report preparation, and
project management.
• Other expenses are associated with communications fee ($13.41).
ONGOING WORK
The work for this project is complete. A project completion report is included with this invoice
transmittal.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
None
CLOSURE
Geosyntec appreciates the opportunity to provide services to Indian River County. If you have any
questions regarding this correspondence, please feel free to contact me at 904.858.1818.
Sincerely,
N_Y_�
Ramil Mijares, Ph.D.
Senior Staff Engineer
Enclosure —Invoice No. 12144009
FL2291-01 UL14007Aoc
160
Table 1
Summary of Invoices Submitted for Geosyntec's Project Number FL2291
IRC — Rain Flap Removal Project
Geosyntec Protect
Number/IRC Work Invoice No. ` Invoice Date Amount`
Authorization Number
12144005 01/15/2014 $3,522.27
FL2291/8 12144009 01/23/2014 $460.49
TOTAL $3,982.76
FL2291-01UL14007.doc
e"Jftxxw { c imd s i bmwa as
161
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E.
Managing Director
Solid Waste Disposal District
Indian River County
1325 74th Avenue Southwest
Vero Beach, Florida 32968
Subject: Project Completion Report
Construction Quality Assurance Services
East-West Rain Flap Removal Project
IRC Work Authorization No. 8
Indian River County Landfill Facility
Vero Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Mehta:
INTRODUCTION
1200 Riveplace Blvd, Suite 710
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
PH 904.858.1818
FAx 904.396.1143
www.geosyntec.com
24 January 2014
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) is pleased to present to you this project completion
report for Geosyntec Project No. FL2291 - Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Services for
the Class I Landfill at the Indian River County Landfill (IRCL) facility in Vero Beach, Indian
River County, Florida. This project was performed under Work Order No. 8, authorized on
November 12, 2013, pursuant to the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services
between Indian River County, Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) and Geosyntec, dated 15
November 2011. This report has been prepared as a supplement to our final invoice
No. 12144009, dated 23 January 2014.
SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED
The scope of work authorized under Work Order No. 8 consisted of provision of CQA
monitoring services for the East-West Rain Flap Removal (Project). Details and documentation
of the CQA services provided by Geosyntec were presented in the "Final Construction Quality
Assurance Report' (CQA Report) submitted to SWDD and dated 10 December 2013. The
following is a summary of the work that Geosyntec performed under this work order.
JL14008_FL2291_WO #8—project Completion Report
162
Mr. Himanshu Mehta, P.E.
24 January 2014
Page 2
The CQA monitoring and documentation activities were performed during the period of 4 to 7
December 2013. During this period, CQA personnel (with support from SWDD personnel)
monitored the following activities.
• removal of the temporary diversion berm and rain flap;
• connection of the primary geocomposite drainage layer, LCS pipe and bedding gravel
within the leachate corridor; and
• placement and grading of liner protective layer sand over the rain flap removal area.
During construction of the above, CQA personnel verified that the installation met or exceeded
the requirements of the Project Documents. The results of the CQA activities undertaken by
Geosyntec as described in the CQA Report indicate that the Project was constructed in general
accordance with the Project Documents and the solid waste permit issued for the IRCL facility.
Ella �Ze� viii
The approved budget for Work Order No. 8 was $3,985.00. The total invoiced amount,
including the fmal'invoice is $3,982.76. Therefore, Geosyntec completed this project within the
approved budget.
CLOSURE
Geosyntec appreciates the opportunity to provide services to Indian River County. If you have
any question regarding this correspondence, please feel free to contact either of the undersigned
at (904) 858-1818.
Sincerely,
Rutuparna Joshi, E.I.
Senior Staff Engineer
Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate
JL14008_FL2291_WO #8—Project Completion Report
163
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,,4i�'%�;�
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ?
BOARD MEMORANDUM
Date: February 10, 2014
To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator o t��
From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Cx`
Prepared By: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District
Subject: Final Pay for the Third Amendment to Republic Services for the Rain Flap
Removal Project
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS:
On November 12, 2013, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Board approved the Third
Amendment to Republic Services for the Rain Flap Removal Project utilizing American
Environmental Group (AEG) as their prime subcontractor. The approval to AEG was in the amount
of $17,125.00 which included a 10% management fee of $1,712.50 to Republic Services to not
exceed the total project cost of $18,837.50. Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) provided limited
construction quality assurance (CQA) testing and monitoring activities for the project under a
separate authorization.
ANALYSIS:
Geosyntec has provided a review and recommendation for payment of the first and final invoice
submitted by Republic Services on January 9, 2014 in the total amount of $18,837.50 which
includes the approved amount for AEG and the 10% management fee.
FUNDING:
Funding for the Rain Flap Removal project is budgeted and available in the Segment 3 Landfill
lateral expansion account which is funded from SWDD assessments and user fees.
ACCOUNT NO.:
Description
Account Number
Amount
Segment 3 Landfill Lateral Expansion - Rain Flap Removal
411-169000-10009
$18,837.50
RECOMMENDATION:
SWDD staff recommends that its Board approve the final invoice in amount of $18,837.50 to
Republic Services.
SWDD Agenda - Final Pay for Third Amendment to Republic Services for Rain Flap Removal Project Page 1 of 2
164
ATTACHMENT(s):
1. Final Invoice Review Memorandum from Geosyntec
APPROVED FOR AGENDA:
By:
Jos PR A. Baird, County Administrator
For. t� ,4
Date
Indian River Co.
Approved Date
Administration
Legal
Budget
SWDD
240 °`
�� 1
SWDD -Finance
SWDD Agenda - Final Pay for Third Amendment to Republic Services for Rain Flap Removal Project Page 2 of 2
165
Geosptecll,
consultants
Mr. Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E.
Managing Director
Solid Waste Disposal District
Indian River County
1325 74th Avenue SW
Vero Beach, Florida 32968
Subject: Review of Final Invoice
East-West Rain Flap Removal Project
Indian River County Class I Landfill
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
Dear Mr. Mehta:
1200 Riverplace Blvd.
Suite 710
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
PH 904.858.1818
FAX 904.396.1143
www.geosyntec.com
24 January 2014
Per your request, Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) has reviewed the Invoice # 355504, dated 9
January, 2014, submitted by Treasure Coast Refuse — A Division of Republic Services Inc. (RSI) for
the Cell 1 East-West Rain Flap Removal Project (Project) at the Indian River County (IRC) Landfill
facility. This is the first and final invoice submitted by RSI. RSI subcontracted the Project work to
American Environmental Group Ltd. (AEG). This invoice (# 355504) consists of the invoice
submitted by AEG to RSI and the contract management fee by RSI (see Attachment A).
Geosyntec has reviewed this invoice based on: (i) limited construction quality assurance (CQA)
monitoring and documentation activities performed during the Project by Geosyntec from December
4 through 7, 2013; (ii) e-mail communication from Rodney Aaron with IRC Solid Waste Disposal
District (SWDD); and (iii) telephone conversations between Fred Chandler (Geosyntec), Rodney
Aaron (IRC SWDD), Michael Behr (RSI), Himanshu Mehta (IRC SWDD) and Kwasi
Badu-Tweneboah (Geosyntec) during the Project.
The review of this invoice is solely based on the above referenced limited CQA, emaiis and telephone
conversations.
AEG has requested payment for the following items:
1. Mobilization/Demobilization = $3,500. Work for this item is complete and conforms to the
"Indian River County Landfill Cell 1 East-West Rain Flap Removal Bid Form " and
Construction Drawings entitled "Cell 1 East-West Rain Flap Removal Drawings Indian
River County, Florida, " both dated September 2013, and prepared by Geosyntec Consultants,
Jacksonville, Florida. These documents are hereafter collectively referred to as the Project
Documents.
2. Liquid Dewatering/Pumping = $2,250. Work for this item is complete and conforms to the
J1,14001—Letter for Review of AEG Invoice
engineers I scitmii`its I innovators
166
Geosn to c 1200 Riverplace 7 0
J�% G Suite 710
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
consultants PH 904.858.1818
FAX 904.396.1143
www.geosyntee.corn
Project Documents.
3. Rain Flap Removal = $10,500. Work for this item is complete and conforms to the Project
Documents.
4. Materials = $875. Work for this item is complete and conforms to the Project Documents.
It is noted that Geosyntec on-site CQA personnel performed limited monitoring of the placement,
spreading, and grading of the liner protective layer sand over the rain flap removal area. SWDD
personnel provided the final monitoring and also provided photographic documentation of the
completed work. Geosyntec provided SWDD with a final CQA report documenting the CQA
activities for the Project on 10 December 2013.
The total amount invoiced by AEG is $17,125.00. With the additional 10% contract management fee
by RSI, the total invoice amount is $18,837.50. The invoice amount is within the total contract
amount of $18,837.50 approved by the SWDD Board for the Project.
Based on the above review, the work for the Project appears to be complete and Geosyntec
recommends payment approval of the invoice amount of $18,837.50.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact either of
the undersigned at 904.858.1818.
Sincerely,
Rutuparna Joshi, E.I.
Senior Staff Engineer
Kwasi Badu-Tweneboah, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate/Project Manager
Attachment A
Copy: Michael Behr, Republic Services Inc.
]1,14001 Letter for Review of AEG Invoice
engineers I scientists I innovators
IN
January 9, 2014
Mr. Himanshu Mehta
IRC SWDD Managing Director
Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District
1325 74" Ave SW
Vero Beach, FL 32968
RE: Rain Flap removal
Dear Himanshu,
The invoice for Republic Services' reimbursement request for American Environmental
Group LTD is attached for your review.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely, ,/�
Michael Behr
Division Manager
MB/ta
Treasure Coast Refuse
3905 Oslo Road
Vero Beach, FL 32968 .
772-562-6620 0 Fax 772-770-1516
republicservices.com
168
3
SURE COASTFUS
l "IFIRST IN SERVICE'
Bill To
INvo1c*E
TREASURE COAST REFUSE
3905 Oslo Road
Vero Beach, Florida 32968
(772) 562-6620 - Vero Beach
(772).465-5419 - Fort Pierce
Indian River County Solid Waste
SWDD
1325 74TH Avenue SW
Vero Beach, FL 32968
355504 1/9/14
Invoice # Invoice Date
Service Address .
1223
Cust#:
Please detach here and retum with your payment. Thank You, Amount Enclosed
------ Treasurer Coast-Refuse-------.._----_____..__._.._______.._.._.._.........----------_----------_-----
TO AVOID LATE CHARGES, CURRENT PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE 25TH OF THE MONTH
Date Description _ Qty. Rate Total
1/9/14 Landfill rain flap removal project performed by AEG 17125.00
1/9/14 10% as' per approved contract for management costs/fees 1712.50
Cust#:
Service Address: 1223
Landfill
Invoice #355504
For Period:
'lease pay INVOICE TOTAL
18837.50
December 2013
169
THIRD.AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT AGREEMENT
INDIAN RiVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
This Third Amendment to Contract Agreement ("Amendment") Is entered into this day of
. 2013 ("Effective Date") by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID
WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT. a dependent special district of Indian River County, Florida, whose
address Is % Department of Utility Services, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach Florida 32960
(hereinafter referred to as the "District" or "SWDD"), and R-mublic Services of Florida Limited
Partnership whose address is 3905 Oslo Road. Vero Beach FL 32968 (hereinafter referred to as
the "Contractor"), for the services set forth herein.
BACKGROUND RECITALS;
WHEREAS, the District and the Contractor entered into that certain Contract Agreement, dated
January 1, 2011, as amended by the First Amendment to Contract Agreement, dated February
7, 2012, as amended by the Second Amendment to Contract Agreement, dated April 2, 2013
(the Contract Agreement and amendment together with all contract documents appended
thereto Is hereinafter referred to as* the "Contract"), which provides for the professional
operation, management and post closure requirements of the Gass 1 landfill at 1325 74th
Avenue Southwest, Vero Beach, Florida (hereinafter "Landfill"); for the operation and
maintenance of the landfill gas collection and control system (GCCS); the operation and
maintenance of the adjacent storm water management system and associated roads and the
professional operation and management of the non -Class 2 landfill portions of the Indian River
County Landfill site including but not limited to the management of the Municipal Recovery
Facility (MRF), the Small Load Drop-off Area, the Waste Tire Facility, the Metal Storage Area,
the Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Facility, Clean Concrete Storage Area and other
maintenance activities as well as the off-site activities associated with the operations and
maintenance of the five customer convenience centers including transportation and disposal
service for eight (8) specific locations, up to twenty (20) roadway cleanup projects, and up to
twenty (20) special events; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Contract, the Contractor, at SWDD's request and subject to
mutually satisfactory negotiated terms and acceptable compensation, shall provide additional
services in connection with the Indian River County Landfill and the customer convenience
centers not included above and as required by SWDD; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Contract to provide for such additional services, and
WHEREAS, to enhance and improve Its operation and maintenance of the landfill GCCS,
Contractor desires to install and operate an electronic monitoring system ("Fieetzoom"); and
195
170
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Contract to allow for the installation and operation
of Fleetzoom.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereto, Intending to be legally bound, covenant and agree to amend the Contract as follows:
1. The existing Article 1 — SCOPE OF WORK of the Contract Is modified to Include the
following:
RAIN FLAP REMOVAL PROJECT. The Contractor shall undertake and complete the Rain
Flap Removal project at the landfill which is the removal of a temporary liner feature
originally Installed within Segment 3 Cell i to minimize the generation of leachate from
rain water. The Contractor is authorized, to use the services of American Environmental
Group, Ltd. (AEG) as a subcontractor on the project based on being the most cost
effective and qualified vendor to perform the work. The Contractor will coordinate the
project with the project engineer, Geosyntec, regarding their Construction Quality
Assurance (CCIA) monitoring services for this project.
Rain Flap Removal Protect:
1. Mobilization/Demobilization
2. Liquid Dewatering/Pumping (if needed)
3. Rain Flap Removal
4. Materials
FLEMOOM. The Contractor shall install Fleetzoom at the Landfill, and shall be
responsible for all subsequent operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of
Fleetzoom during the term of the Contract. All costs related to the Installation,
operation and maintenance of Fleetzoom shall be borne by the Contractor. The
Contractor further agrees to Indemnify the District for any damage to the GCCS that is
caused directly or Indirectly by Fleetzoom during the term of the Contract. The
Contractor may, at any time during the term of the Contract and at its sole discretion,
remove or uninstall Fleetzoom, and may choose to replace it with a different monitoring
system. Upon the expiration or termination of the Contract, the Contractor shall, at its
sole discretion, (a) uninstall and remove Fleetzoom or (b) sell Fleetzoom to the District
(or If the District has contracte4 with a third party to maintain and operate the landfill
GCCS, sell Fleetzoom to such third party) at a mutually -agreed upon price. upon the
happening of either of the contingencies listed above,'the Contractor's responsibilities
(including but not limited to its responsibility to Indemnify the District) related to
Fleetzoom shall terminate, and In the case of subsection (b); the District or the third
party, as the case may be, shall assume all costs and responsibilities for the operation
and maintenance, repair or replacement of Fleetzoom. Contractor shall not be
196
171
responsible for any costs relating to operation, maintenance, repair or replacement
after the removal or sale of Fleetzoom.
2. The existing Article 2 —TERM OF CONTRACT Is modified to include the following:
v) The Contractor shall be completed with the Rain Flap Removal Project at the
landfill within 7 calendar days from the Notice to Proceed. Any change In
contract time shall be based on authorized and approved basis.
3. The existing Article 3 —COMPENSATION of the Contract is modified to include the
following:
xv) Payment for the Rain Flap Removal Project at the landfill shall not exceed
$17,125.00 as provided In the proposal by American Environmental Group, Ltd.
In Exhibit #1 plus the management fee outlined below. The price does not
Include the following:
• Contract Management costs/fees of 10% as agreed by the parties pursuant
to the Contract. Such contract management costs/fees shall be paid to
Contractor together with progress payments for the project.
• The total'psVmoot to Contractor shalt not to.exceed $18,83750.
A. The background recitals are true and correct and form a material part of the
Amendment.
5. All terms and provisions of the Contract not amended by this Amendment shall be and
remain- In full force and effect.
197
172
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their
respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first written above.
Attest:
Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and
Comptroller
By:
Deputy Clerk
Date Approved by SWDD:
Approved By:
Josep . Baird, Mntykilihinistrator
Signed, sealed, and delivered in the
presence of:
Print Name:
Print Name:
(owner)
Solid Waste Disposal District
Indian River County, Florida
Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency By:
Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney
Republic Services of Florida, Limited
Partnership ("Contractor")
BY: Republic Services of Florida GP, Inc.,
Its General Partner
Print Name:
Print Title:
198
173
EXHIBIT 1
AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL.OROUP, LTD.
199
174
.... .......
Wu Myer County LAkmM
cd 1 But-wat Rain Rup Rcaioyw
Ma yam (Notts)
elan
Dtwdpdn
I
(Nottio
unit
I
unit
cut
cat
I
Mobil
I
LMVS—
35ot5
--
3 slbn-
2Uquid
Dew*=ftW?vq&g Wote M
TOD
ThMUORds
17---Lwo
Z?-Xb
3
Rah[Flmp Rwwval WW V)
3
Dk"
10 Soo
4
bWwWs (Note VI)
I
Iw@S=
8?5'
f7S".
5
Slip BubmdWo Pump (SMtftft IPA) (idols VW
I
Lumps=
Z.V00
zirvo
Total
Nolo:
11 Oman pauNwhuchurs sadwslodgmalkWand sbmW bovod&dby Oxkusw.
cM*uiw4dM*w*WAwOMwpftbftftvwL 4adawl otpww ad dwWounkfisompe ef
wakdou In ffidwaidand VOW by OOiM*rwduw*% DebowsawdoL
IR
ry
KOM diffitnIffliMbeeasummid4disionowashM alt, hismesoyAMapaottaafCdlips,uatdne I mudi
Bbsdklf$euiq►tbFd�+�biO6ttspptaodethbl,'JOd1l(Oh'tela}otr�wglsamt[rosiintlsplomdioo. still
ptoriitfstitaoR�caitmbtrt�bpa.p.�tarpaefi�fdttou�tafo•eoltdtwar�i>otiwatttlotr�lydpgr. ?ti.
0af*wtbdtptavlde
Adloopp"! bydw
WSML tv"ev"MR4
do fd*t W-0 MWWWV�01
PWI a MV *fp ctrotaid,
ft I EVAMOXWW
OL Thavooddougeonkfisp*wbow-d- �Wwio ossAflbm
MisCowader"
I do MDMhxLukd"bv
iF vNift Od doft bA "&*Vm 144 at &B War 99 bodgmt pwft 6 VW OM OWo;'7S logs)
Oak AL IM I I RMOMMAtwo dow"oompicts; and
@*kvrbpWf**vwftftpvIWhwm*
266MIOddelft
fWW00%dargand(OR"R 41r poods room
d Ip" bucio Injeffm DeOwnervil psDvlh the 3dgaigrareixiltbstegabedfseotttito-gnpisWm-gn*Wm buftbGbodio%ibbpwddwAbtd*hwdivminzdolLV
bomadwedislosobolb willaphissinodeApilson"
VII UtCsdr&*rdsUpwOAd61 I I
200
175