Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01/22/2013 (2)
PROCLAMATION Honoring Alma Miller on Her Retirement Effective January 31, 2013 WHEREAS, Alma Miller was born and raised in New Jersey where she graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the College of Saint Elizabeth, and WHEREAS, Alma Miller was employed by AT&T for twenty-three years retiring as a Project Manager, and relocated with her husband Glenn to Indian River County, and 'vVHEREAS, Alma Miller began her second career as an Interviewing Clerk with the Indian River County Health Department, Environmental Health Division on July 3, 2000, later being promoted to a Staff Assistant and WHEREAS, Alma Miller affectionately known as Ms. Miller consistently demonstrated an aura of upmost professionalism in her appearance, work product and approach to customer service, and WHEREAS, Ms Miller revealed her compassion and concern for the community by reaching out to those in need as a volunteer through the HIV/AIDS Network, Every Dream Has a Price, Wabasso Progressive League, VN A Hospice, Consulate Healthcare, and Church of God Treasure Coast District Evangelism Team, and WHEREAS, Alma served the citizens of Indian River County in an exemplary manner for twelve years, at the Indian River County Health Department and as a community volunteer, and WHEREAS, Alma's love of people and the belief of the importance of family inspire those around her and although she is retiring from the Indian River County Health Department her passion for helping people in need will continue. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board extends to Alma Miller thanks for a job well done and its heartfelt wishes for a happy, and healthy retirement. Adopted this 22h day of January, 2013. Board of County Commissioners, Indian River County, Florida AVER C J .h Flescher, Chairman We S. Davis, Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Bob Solari Tim_Z_Orc DIVI$I013 OF FORESTRY 5200 HIGHWAY 4g,NORTH OKEECHOBEE DISTRICT OKEECHOBEE,FLORIDA 34972-8697 (863)462-5160 (863)462-5162 FAx '�►, � ' war FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES COMMISSIONER ADAM H. PUTNAM October 19, 2012 Mr.Joseph Baird, County Administrator Indian River County 1801 27`''Street Vero Beach, FL. 32960-3365 Subject: 2011-2012 Wildfire Protection Annual Report Dear Mr. Baird: Please see attached e-copy of the Wildfire Protection Annual Report as required by Florida Forest Service policy. This report outlines the Fire Control Activities for the past year and is intended for the County Commissioners and Administrators. Would you please place the report on the Commission's consent agenda and notify my office of the date it will appear before the Commissioners. If you have any questions or need any additional information,please let me know. ,. Sincerely, CHARLES H.BRONSON COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & CONSUMER SERVICES (-Zo4v 111� L --,)r, Indian River&St. Lucie Counties Cc: Jim Rath, District Manager,Okeechobee File 1-800-HELPFLA Fa. www.FreshFromFlorida.com 2 Florida Foic,i So%ice 2011-2012 r Protection I r - --� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY _October 2012^ _ As required by the Florida Forest Service(FFS),an annual report is submitted each year to review the work undertaken by the Service during the past fiscal year. Currently Indian River County is assessed$13,821.36 for fire protection of Did You Know: 197,448 acres. The following is a break down of the ADAM H.PUTNAM,COMMISSIONER Service's activities for July 1,2011 to June 30,2012. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE& • Wildfires in the CONSUMER SERVICES state of Florida totaled 3;255 fires Decreased Wildfire Activity and 80,254 acres. The Florida Forest Service(FFS) Fires % Acres % a Florida is the,light- responded to 14 wildfires this Cause ning capitol of North year in Indian River County, Campfire 0 0 0 0 America:: e Re- down from 44. Acres burned Children 1 7 0 >1 7h public q1 ORO-is' decreased from 945 to 715 Debris Burn* 0 0 0 0 the ligFiWAn 6 pitol acres. The decrease in wildfire Debris Burn-Auth-Broadcast/Acreage 0 0 0 0 of the v Grid. activity was due to a combina- Debris Burn-Ruth-Piles 0 0 0 0 tion of an early wet season and Debris Burn-Auth-Yard Trash 0 0 0 0 • Florida'swildfire; Tropical Storm Debby. Debris Burn-Nonauth-Acreage 0 0 0 0 season Isyeate - Debris Burn-Nonauth-Piles 1 7 2 >1 round,With It's typi- Fifty-seven percent(57%)Of Debris Burn-Nonauth-Yard Trash 0 0 0 0 cal p 'akbeing dur, wildfires occurring in Indian ing the dry montfis River County were caused by Equipment use 0 0 0 0 § Equipment-Agriculture 0 0 0 0 of May.and June. lightning. "Unknown"exists as a category where,upon investi- Equipment-Logging 0 0 0 0 • The largest fire imgation,insufficient evidence Equipment-Recreation 0 0 0 0 Indian River Cointy Equipment-Transportation 0 0 0 0 and/or witnesses are present vwdisthe Sarld'HiltIncendiary 1 7 3 >1 to determine an actual cause. Fire W]tic burned` Lightning 8 57 623 87 355 acres south Please see the adjacent table for a complete list of fires by Miscellaneous-Breakout 0 0 0 0 west of Fellsmere Cause and Acres. Miscellaneous-Electric Fence 0 0 0 0 on May 8i Four homes Were thfeat- Miscellaneous-Fireworks 0 0 0 0 ened. ;I Miscellaneous-Power Lines 3 21 87 12 Miscellaneous-Structure 0 0 0 0 Miscellaneous-Other 0 0 0 0 Railroad 0 0 0 0 Okeechobee District Smoking 0 0 0 0 Key PersonnelE Unknown 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 14 715 James B.Rath,Dtsttict Manager okeechobee Note: Zero(0)wildfires were caused by campfires,equipment,and 863.462.5160 Briefing meeting prior to the prescribed railroads. burn at Russell Grove. 10 Ridley;Admin.Asst okeechotiee Florida Forest Service Assists County Parks 8r,Recreation With Wildfire Mitigation 863.462'.5360 The FFS continues to work Dale Armstrong,Forest Area Sup. Halistrom Farmstead, s Indian River/St Lu cis Counties closely with the Indian River North Sebastian Conser- 772.7-18.5085' Parks&Recreation Depart- vation Area(NSCA),Rus- ment. Beth Powell is our main sell Grove,and Wabasso Richard Bamlet,SenlorForester contact FFS assistance has Scrub. Glades,High lands,Indian River, included prescribed burning, Martin,Okeech ee,SLLucle pre-suppression plowing,mow- Prescribed fire on the 772.71 78.5067 Russell Grove tract in - ing,and roller chopping on Top Photo: Ansin Parcel before mow- Melissa Yun ,ciisites considered to be wildland- Roseland served a dual pur- Ing treatment Bottom Photo: Ansin specialist neighboring Spist urban interface(WUI)areas of pose;(1)protect g hborin g Parcel after treatment Glades,Highlands,Indian River, concern. residents by reducing the fuel Northeast corner of CR 510/512 Inter Martin Okeecfiotiee,SL Lucie load,and(2)enhancing the sectlonSebastlan,FL 772.487.3008 County sites included Ansin, (cont'd on next page) 3 2011-2012 Wildfire Protection Annual Report Page 2 (cont'd from previous page) These breaks served as a testi- habitat for on-site residents—the monial that our partnership with x ': 'w. d gopher tortoise. the County is beneficial. On March 27,2012,the Scrub Jay Fire burned 80 acres on the I NSCA tract in Roseland. AILA - though five homes were poten- tially threatened,mowed fuel Left Mowed fire breaks are estab- breaks from the previous year lished on the NSCA tract In 2011 either slowed or stopped the Top:Indian River Fire Rescue Battalion Chief,John Freeman assesses the fire's progression toward homes. situation from the mowed fire break. Staffing ` The FFS has one Forest Area one Senior Forester(stationed equipment are here to assist Supervisor,one Senior Forest in Vero Beach)and one Wild- where other emergency haz- Ranger,and two Forest Rangers land Fire Mitigation Specialist ards may arise such as torna- assigned to the county. We are on staff to assist with Forestry does,hurricanes,floods,etc. anticipate gaining another osi- activities within Indian River Our staff is in close relationship tiont e g with federal rant monies. County. Refer to the front page with the Emergency Operations for a list of key personnel. Center should any need arise. Top The aublaylrosenaa The Okeechobee District has In addition,our personnel and U p an,ominousplume Center Flrp flares upas 1; consumes a group of pal metio Burn Authorizations Authorized Burn Type Fires Acres Piles Bottom FFS hellcopte`r, During the past twelve months the Agricultural-Pasture 277 3,769 714 Forestry24," it the Service issued 851 authorizations Agricultural-Range management 64 2.926 56 blaie;fromthe's, , within Indian River County. Authori- Agricultural-Stubble(post harvest) 0 0 0 zations were for agriculture,silvicul- tural,and limited land clearing type AgriculturahSugarcane 0 0 0 "Never flgM fires. There were a total of 16,631 Agriculture-Citrus 434 0 869 I acres and 1,720 piles burned. Land clearing-Non-residential-With ACI 0 0 0 We from ego." f Please see adjacent table for a com- Land clearing-Non-residential-W/O ACI 27 0 43 C.Caldwell,1979- plete list of authorizations by Burn Type. Land clearing-Residential-With ACI 0 0 0 Land clearing-Residential-Without ACI 22 0 36 w# ' Siivicultural-Disease control 1 0 1 FLORIDA FOREST SERVICE Siivicultural-Ecological 11 1,422 0 Silvicultural-Hazard removal 7 6,814 0 Dale Armstrong,ForestArea Sup. Indian Rive0orestrystadon Silvicultural-Other 0 0 0 525541ststreet Silvicultural-Prior to seed 0 0 0 yer'Boach,Fl.32967, Silvicultural-Site preparation 1 0 1 Phpne 772.778.5085 Silvicultural-Wildlife 7 1,700 0 faic772.778.6ib Total 851 16,631 1,720 E41; DaleAmistrong,gheshf omflodda.com wob:w flklofcom Goals For Next Year(2011-12) • Identify private&public areas located in the wildland/urban interface that require wildfire mitiga- tion work. Mitigation includes fuel reduction through the means of prescribed fire,roller chop- ping,and/or mechanical mowing. Areas currently identified include Vero Lake Estates,Oslo Park, and Vero Beach Airport • Conduct prescribed burns on the following County parcels for wildfire mitigation purposes:North Sebastian Conservation Area,Oslo Riverfront Conservation Area,Hallstrom Farmstead,and Wa- basso Scrub. • Continue providing Fire Prevention Programs via fairs,schools,static displays in public areas, and/or meeting with local Home Owner Associations. �_ • Continue to provide prescribed burn assistance to the Indian River Parks Division,St.John's Wa- ter Management District,and the St.Sebastian Buffer Preserve State Park. 4 - =2. St . Baldrick S F 0 U N D A T 10 N Conquer Childhood Cancers http://www.stbaldricks.org/events/indianriver www. StBaldricks.org 888.899. BALD 4-5 Y St. Baldrick's FOUNDATION Conquer Childhood Cancers The St. Baldrick's Foundation is a volunteer-driven charity committed to funding the most promising research to find cures for childhood cancers and give survivors long and healthy lives. http://www.stbaldricks.org/events/indianriver StBaldricks.org 888.899. BALD St. Baldrick's WhyWe Exist FOUNDATION Conquer Childhood Cancers CHILDHOOD CANCER Each year, around the world: Many childhood cancer survivors live with long-term 175,000 effects,even after receiving <hildr�n are diaq:iosed 0 r �=ny more qc the World's best treatments.- 0 � Infants& 62% 281*J/0 Toddlers Children Teens Young Adults c. �erxste=-n� ial€re-+`rxacc,t��Yi;�q can get cancer disease killer of children in the U.S. StBaidricks.org 888.899. BALD baldrick's s s r F , -� I N Why We Exist Conquer Childhood Cancers • One in five children diagnosed with cancer in the U.S. will not survive Childhood cancer isn'tjust2 F � Ch one disease.. .there are over a dozen M ajor types and countless subtypes, each requiring specific research to - ' develop the best treatment for every child �^ • In the last 20 years, only 2 new drugs k have been specifically developed to " y treat children with cancer • Less than 4% of the National Cancer Institute's budget is directed to childhood cancer research http://Www.stbaldricks.org/events/indianriver StBaldricks.org 888.899. BALD / St. r FOUNDATION Fundraising Events Conquer Childhood Cancers With you... hope begins AL 0 0 0 H,a _a A,"tzl; ;.txxs 01 3t3?e ler fc> E= >,<1: € • Since 2000, more than 5,970 events have been held raising over $152 million for lifesaving childhood cancer research Sleve Pt.tConner to ra • Since 2000, 249,300 Shavees including 25,370 women have Shaved phy their heads • More than 56,240 got Bald in 2012 StBaldricks.org 888.899. BALD St. Baldrick's Research FOUNDATION Conquer Childhood Cancers The St. Baldrick's Foundation exists to conquer childhood cancers! Since the Foundation's first grants as an independent charity in 2005, Survival rate r all it has awarded more than $103 childhood cancers million to support the best in �. pediatric oncology research, ' to making St. Baldrick's the largest ' private funder of childhood cancer A 1977 research grants. 2011 IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES StBaldricks.org 888.899 . BALD ft v baldric z Research FOUNDATION Conquer Childhood Cancers . Baldrick's Foundation and Stand a er Join forcesf o conquer childhood cancers St. BaldrT11 ick sR FOUNDATION • Over the next 4 years, St. Baldrick's and SU2C will commit a total of $14 million to form the SU2C-St. Baldrick's Pediatric Cancer Dream Team • The pairing of the two organizations brings together two of the worlds leading cancer research groups in a unified mission to accelerate the discoveries of new advances for treating pediatric cancer StBaldricks.org 888.899. BALD v Daldrick's F - N Media Coverage OUNDATIO Conquer Childhood Cancers �� Bray shaves head for St.Baldrick's event The Foundation has been covered in hundreds of media outlets across the nation and around the world including the USA Today, Daily Mail, The New York Times, Family Circle, Girls Life, Soap , Opera Weekly, Washington Post, DER SPIEGEL, Good Morning .. , America, CNN, Fox, The Early Show and Access Hollywood. *1.4 billion media impressions for print, broadcast, radio as of Nov. 2012 (does not include online publications) —WN *Does not reflect full coverage, only those stories captured by Google Alerts, online news searches and Factiva print monitoring � timesunion.com X78` jp People shave heads for St. Baldrick's Goodbye to locks •w.-"«sus=% -' -..?^ r, .:- e 0fit gV105 ve .u;he wca. f= BALD N FOR A �i x o GTSE StBaldricks.org 888.899 . BALD RE s Baldr"ck't http://www.stbaldricks.org/events/indianriver FOUNDATION Conquer Childhood Cancers %, Onq er H U " " is (6.*hi'*1="dh'mood cancer'. DONATE sF SHAVE SPREAD THE WORD VOLUNTEER StBaldricks.org y . .; St.Baldrick's volunteers Carlo,Tanya,and their son Gustavo. ' shaved together in solidarity with kids fighting cancer;their .: �£ daughter Fiona root pictured)also volunteered her time. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS January 22, 2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: January 15, 2013 Subject: District School Board Committee Memberships From: Laura E. Vasquez; Commissioner Assistant, District 2 Attached are the lists of the District School Board Committee Memberships that were appointed in the Annual organization meeting held November 20, 2012. (Attachment) lev 5 School District of Indian River Coun Vision: Educate and inspire every student to be successful Mission: To serve all students with excellence DISTRICT January 7, 2013 SCHOOLBOARD Karen Disney-Brombach District 1 Honorable Joseph E. Flescher Jeffrey Pegler Chairman, County Commission District 2 Board of County Commissioners 1801 27th Street, Bldg A Matthew McCain Vero Beach, FL 32960 District 3 Carol Johnson Subject: District School Board Committee Memberships District 4 Dear Mr. �- Claudia Jimenez District 5 Congratulations on y position as Chairman of the County Commission! It has been my pleasure working with you and your fellow Commissioners over the years. I look forward to our continued working relationship. DISTRICT S���ESTRIC DENT At this time, I would like to formally announce that I was appointed to serve as Chairman of the District School Board and that Ms. Claudia Jimenez was Fra``1!t�s J. Adams, Ea.D. appointed as Vice Chairman. Included in our Annual Organization Meeting held November 20, 2012, Board Members, Citizens, and Staff Members were appointed to County Committees. A copy of the two lists is attached. Please forward both lists to the appropriate Committees. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any concern now or in the future. Sincerely, Mrs. Carol Johnson Chairman of District School Board CJ/jas cc: Dr. Adams, Superintendent of Schools 1990 25th Street . Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3395 Telephone: 772-564-3200 www.indianriverschools.org Equal Opportunity Educator and Employer ' 2013 County Commission Appointments Official Appointments by Chairman Johnson ➢ County Commission's Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Committee Member and an Alternate —Voting Position Duties included attending monthly meetings on the 2nd Wednesday of the month at 10 a.m. in Room 131-501. Last year Mr. Pegler served, with Ms. Jimenez as Alternate. Mr. McCain was appointed with Ms. Jimenez as Alternate. ➢ County Commission's Economic Development Council (EDC), Committee Member—Two-Year, Voting Position Duties included attending monthly meetings on the 3�d Tuesday of the month at 3 p.m. in Conference Room 131-501. Last year Ms. Jimenez served, with Mrs. Disney-Brombach as Alternate. Ms Jimenez was appointed with Mrs. Disney-Brombach as Alternate. ➢ Indian River County Planning and Zoning Commission, Two-Year, Non-Voting Position with an Alternate The Commission met on the 2nd and 4t" Thursday of the month at 7 p.m. in County Commission Chambers. These were two-year positions. The appointments were for 2013 and 2014 calendar years. Last year, Mrs. Johnson continued for her second year, with Mr. Pegler as Alternate. Mrs Johnson stated that she would serve with Mr. Pegler as Alternate. Board Appointments A. Approval of Appointment of a Citizen to the Indian River County Citizen Advisory Committee, re: MPO Transportation Ryan Wilson volunteered and was recently appointed to the position on September 11, 2012. The term of this position would coincide with the Board's organization meeting. The CAC held at least four meetings each year. Chairman Johnson stated that Ryan Wilson was recently appointed; therefore, no action was needed this year. 7 t 2013 County Commission Appointments B. Approval of Appointment of a Citizen to the Indian River County School Planning Citizen Oversight Committee re: Interlocal Agreement for Public School Planning Peter Robinson served on this Committee since its inception in 2003. The purpose of the Committee was to monitor implementation of the Interlocal Agreement and to report to participating local governments-- the District School Board and the general public--on the effectiveness with which the Interlocal Agreement was being implemented. The Committee met once per year. The effective date of this appointment was January 1, 2013. Board Members would vote on this appointment. Mr. Robinson submitted a report and acceptance for an additional term. Chairman Johnson called for a motion. Mrs. Disney-Brombach moved approval to appoint Peter Robinson. Mr. McCain seconded the motion and it carried unanimously, with a 5-0 vote. C. Approval of Appointment to Indian River County, School Concurrency Sub-Committee Workgroup, Non-voting This workgroup was established in 2007. The purpose of the workgroup was to discuss school concurrency as a small, working group. It did not replace the large committee group (all elected officials). The Board must elect a Board Member and a Staff Member. •- Last year Mrs. Johnson and Mrs. Olson served. Chairman Johnson called for a motion. Mr. Pegler moved approval of Mrs. Johnson and Mr. Sanders. Mr. McCain seconded the motion and it carried unanimously, with a 5-0 vote. D. Approval of Appointment to County Commission's Value Adjustment Board (VAB), One Committee Member and One Alternate Reference: Florida State Statute 194.015. The Committee met each year as needed. Note that the appointment would be effective upon approval by the County Commission. Last year Mrs. Johnson was appointed as Committee Member and Mrs. Disney-Brombach was appointed as Alternate. Chairman Johnson called for a motion. Mr. McCain moved approval of Chairman Johnson as Committee Member and Mrs. Disney-Brombach as Alternate Mr. Pegler seconded the motion and it carried unanimously, with a 5-0 vote. 8 2013 County Commission Appointments r E. Approval of Appointment to County Commission's Value Adjustment Board (VAB), One Citizen Member The Committee met each year as needed. Mrs. Rose Spytek was currently serving as the Citizen Committee Member. Eligibility was set forth in Florida State Statute 194.015. Mrs. Rose Spytek agreed to continue as the citizen member through the end of the 2012 Tax Cycle, ending with a final meeting in either December 2012 or January 2013. The effective date for a new appointee was July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. Chairman Johnson announced that Mrs. Spytek had served the Board well and had requested not to continue past the 2012 Tax Cycle, with the last meeting to be held in January 2013. The Board would select a replacement before the beginning of the 2013 Tax Cycle that begins on July 1, 2013. Chairman Johnson called for a motion. Mr. McCain moved approval to continue the appointment of Mrs. Spvtek to the County Commission's Value Adjustment Board as our Citizen Member through the end of the 2012 Tax Cycle (January 2013). Mr. Pegler seconded the motion and it carried unanimously, with a 5-0 vote. Information ➢ County, School Planning, Elected Officials Oversight Committee Membership bylaws required that the Chairman of the School Board hold this position. 9 Committee or Organization Assignments/Memberships 2012-2013 7-1 -11 100 Ruth Shaw,Coordinator of Adult&Community Education Indian River County Chamber of Commerce Indian River County Census Committee Workforce Solutions of Treasure Coast and Youth Council Articulation Coordination Committee(ACC)-Appointed by ` . . . .�. Frances J.Adams, Ed.D.,Superintendent Commissioner of Education Children's Services Advisory Committee Indian River County School Health Advisory Committee Interagency Coalition Executive Roundtable Learning Alliance Literacy Leaders Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Treasure Coast Work Group Dr. Lillian Torres-Martinez,Director of Student Services Connected 4 Kids Indian River County School Health Advisory Committee Juvenile Justice Council. Tobacco Free Partnership of Indian River County Dr.Jamie Robison,Program Specialist&Dr.Christina Hayes School Ps cholo ist Mental Health Collaborative # _,. . Kim McCorrison, School Readiness Coordinator Early Learning Coalition Deborah Long,Director for Staff Development Indian River County Chamber of Commerce Business and Education Committee ,y... �- George Millar,Director of Transportation Community Traffic Safety Team Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Advisory Committee MPO Technical Advisory Committee—Long-Standing Committee Transportation Disadva;nta ed Local Coordinating Board V 61 Carter Morrison,Assistant Superintendent Interlocal Agreement for Public School Planning,School Planning Staff Working Group ..y Scott Sanders, Direct or of Facilities Interlocal Agreement for Public School Planning,School Planning Staff Working Group 77 1977 Nick Westenberger, Planning&Construction Coordinator County Parks and Recreation Committee Donna Brewer,School Social Worker Connected 4 Kids Drug Court Juvenile Justice Council, Page 1 of 2 VII Item A - 11/20/2012 1 of 2 O Committee or Organization Assignments/Memberships 2012-201.3 ggon Janis Spero,Student Support Specialist Connected 4 Kids Juvenile Justice Council Dr.Michael Ferrentino,Executive Director for ESE&Student Services FDLRS Directors Allene Moorehead,Title 1 Reading Youth Guidance 77 Cheryl Conley,Coordinator of Professional Development/TOY 2011 United Way of Indian River County Laura McGill,Program Specialist Center for Autism and Related Disorders(CARD) Page 2 of 2 VII Item A- 11/20/2012 2 of 2 V Y JEFFREY R. SMITH Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller �pgipA 1801 27TH Street Vero Beach, Florida 32961 -1028 Telephone (772) 226-1945 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: January 10, 2013 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS January 4,2013 to January 10, 2013 FROM: DIANE BERNARDO - FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of January'4, 2013 to January 10, 2013. Attachment: DB: MS 12 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293538 1/9/2013 1 COMPBENEFITS COMPANY 236.54 293539 1/9/2013 1 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS CO 105.96 293540 1/9/2013 1 ALLSTATE 668.84 293541 1/10/2013 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 1,467.11 293542 1/10/2013 STURGIS LUMBER&PLYWOOD CO 10.69 293543 1/10/2013 DAVES COMMUNICATIONS/ELECTRONIC 20.00 293544 1/10/2013 JORDAN MOWER INC 192.36 293545 1/10/2013 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC 391.95 293546 1/10/2013 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 912.80 293547 1/10/2013 COPYCO INC DBA 55.94 293548 1/10/2013 RICOH USA INC 14.03 293549 1/10/2013 VELDE FORD INC 12.54 293550 1/10/2013 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC 312.00 293551 1/10/2013 PARALEE COMPANY INC 800.00 293552 1/10/2013 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 149.89 293553 1/10/2013 DELTA SUPPLY CO 219.66 293554 1/10/2013 E-Z BREW COFFEE&BOTTLE WATER SVC 11.48 293555 1/10/2013 KELLY TRACTOR CO 167.25 293556 1/10/2013 GENES AUTO GLASS INC 130.00 293557 1/10/2013 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY CO 709.41 293558 1/10/2013 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER INC 29.81 293559 1/10/2013 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 51.34 293560 1/10/2013 DAILY COURIER SERVICE 1,235.00 293561 1/10/2013 GAYLORD BROTHERS INC 345.60 293562 1/10/2013 SWE INC 325.00 293563 1/10/2013 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS,LTD 623.64 293564 1/10/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL 518.66 293565 1/10/2013 EGP INC 128.00 293566 1/10/2013 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 1,068.93 293567 1/10/2013 BRODART COMPANY 115.00 293568 1/10/2013 PROFORMA IMAGING 89.46 293569 1/10/2013 EXPRESS REEL GRINDING INC 15,000.00 293570 1/10/2013 FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE 404.43 293571 1/10/2013 CENTER POINT INC 337.31 293572 1/10/2013 BARTH CONSTRUCTION INC 620.00 293573 1/10/2013 HOMELAND IRRIGATION 21.83 293574 1/10/2013 R&G SOD FARMS 456.50 293575 1/10/2013 XEROX CORP SUPPLIES 248.71 293576 1/10/2013 GENERAL PART INC 1,078.75 293577 1/10/2013 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 49.00 293578 1/10/2013 WORLD INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT INC 581.48 293579 1/10/2013 BAKER&TAYLOR INC 5,898.63 293580 1/10/2013 BRANDTS APPLIANCE SERVICE INC 124.00 293581 1/10/2013 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 2,314.09 293582 1/10/2013 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 256.20 293583 1/10/2013 LOWES CO INC 1,518.08 293584 1/10/2013 MICROMARKETING LLC 119.94 293585 1/10/2013 K& M ELECTRIC SUPPLY 32.18 293586 1/10/2013 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES INC 25.50 293587 1/10/2013 PENWORTHY COMPANY 909.56 293588 1/10/2013 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 5,460.00 293589 1/10/2013 SUNSHINE REHABILATION CENTER OF IRC INC 15.00 293590 1/10/2013 BOYS&GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN 25,703.91 293591 1/10/2013 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 74.10 293592 1/10/2013 CITY OF VERO BEACH 132,089.03 293593 1/10/2013 SOUTHERN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO 2,730.42 293594 1/10/2013 INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC 15.00 293595 1/10/2013 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 93.48 1 13 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293596 1/10/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 68,500.00 293597 1/10/2013 FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE 52.00 293598 1/10/2013 CCA HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 400.00 293599 1/10/2013 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 65.85 293600 1/10/2013 AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION INC 80.93 `... 293601 1/10/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES 18,781.48 293602 1/10/2013 ACUSHNET COMPANY 35.57 293603 1/10/2013 DUMONT COMPANY INC 1,063.25 293604 1/10/2013 INDIAN RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC 2,364.90 293605 1/10/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS 22.36 293606 1/10/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS 38.31 293607 1/10/2013 TRAFFIC PARTS INC 1,922.25 293608 1/10/2013 VERO HERITAGE INC 1,147.89 293609 1/10/2013 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 167.50 293610 1/10/2013 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 8,087.42 293611 1/10/2013 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 1,967.93 293612 1/10/2013 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 3,939.13 293613 1/10/2013 ACUSHNET COMPANY 773.81 293614 1/10/2013 MIKE CLIFFORD 337.99 293615 1/10/2013 THOMAS S LOWTHER FUNERAL HOME INC 425.00 293616 1/10/2013 TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC 130.48 293617 1/10/2013 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 341.00 29361.8 1/10/2013 GAIL E FLII;1N 247.00 293619 1/10/2013 CITY OF FELLSMERE 268.61 293620 1/10/2013 GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC 148.19 293621 1/10/2013 STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES 425.00 293622 1/10/2013 HOMELESS FAMILY CENTER INC 1,635.41 293623 1/10/2013 COX GIFFORD SEAWINDS 1,700.00 293624 1/10/2013 NEW YORK TIMES 800.80 293625 1/10/2013 PROPERTY DAMAGE APPRAISERS 95.00 293626 1/10/2013 FLORIDA STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION 227.50 293627 1/10/2013 BE SAFE SECURITY ALARMS INC 225.00 293628 1/10/2013 BELANAGY 295.37 293629 1/10/2013 PITNEY BOWES INC 2,196.00 293630 1/10/2013 G K ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2,687.18 293631 1/10/2013 FLORIDA DEPT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES 16,837.61 293632 1/10/2013 COMCAST 75.00 293633 1/10/2013 COMCAST 100.27 293634 1/10/2013 ADVANCED XEROGRAPHICS IMAGING 1,308.14 293635 1/10/2013 ELXSI INC 1,069.85 293636 1/10/2013 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,268.28 293637 1/10/2013 C&C ELECTRIC WORKS INC 1,746.00 293638 1/10/2013 CHRISTOPHER KAFER 175.00 293639 1/10/2013 ST LUCIE COUNTY BOCC 29,318.00 293640 1/10/2013 ST LUCIE COUNTY BOCC 74,073.00 293641 1/10/2013 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION 265.00 293642 1/10/2013 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS 651.00 293643 1/10/2013 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 306.81 293644 1/10/2013 STEVE MCDOUGALL 37.38 293645 1/10/2013 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 1,560.52 293646 1/10/2013 AM PLAYER INC 674.20 293647 1/10/2013 CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 444.79 293648 1/10/2013 FLORIDA DEPT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE 45,842.31 293649 1/10/2013 VAN WAL INC 758.00 293650 1/10/2013 BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS 1,250.00 293651 1/10/2013 RANDOM HOUSE INC 56.25 293652 1/10/2013 COASTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 207,369.74 293653 1/10/2013 JOHNS EASTERN COMPANY INC 24,942.15 293654 1/10/2013 PAK MAIL CENTER 109.12 'wow 293655 1/10/2013 GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 27,005.56 2 14 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293656 1/10/2013 BRIAN DAVIS SEPTIC&BACKHOE SERVICES 2,975.00 293657 1/10/2013 FLORIDA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATIONS 75.00 293658 1/10/2013 EXTREME CONTROL SYSTEMS INC 1,084.20 293659 1/10/2013 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPE 97.06 293660 1/10/2013 CAROLE J MADIGAN 825.00 293661 1/10/2013 HF GROUP LLC 1,592.10 293662 1/10/2013 DUPERON CORPORATION 2,570.41 293663 1/10/2013 POLICASTRO&LEROUX PA 10,762.69 293664 1/10/2013 SUPERIOR SHEDS, INC. 2,806.60 293665 1/10/2013 LUCILENE SANTOS 180.00 293666 1/10/2013 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 91.33 293667 1/10/2013 CRISPERS LLC 439.31 293668 1/10/2013 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 2,310.00 293669 1/10/2013 DAVID L HANCOCK 1,151.00 293670 1/10/2013 TRITEL INC 49.50 293671 1/10/2013 SEASIDE LANDSCAPES INC 465.00 293672 1/10/2013 TENTS N EVENTS INC 400.00 293673 1/10/2013 BRENNTAG MID-SOUTH INC 6,780.34 293674 1/10/2013 VERO US 1 NISSAN HYUNDAI 200.00 293675 1/10/2013 DE LA HOZ BUILDERS INC 600.00 293676 1/10/2013 ALMM LLC 1,000.00 293677 1/10/2013 THE DELGADO GROUP 1,637.73 293678 1/10/2013 FOSTER IRC LLC 111,531.60 293679 1/10/2013 ROBERT E FIELDS 2,967.92 293680 1/10/2013 TOP NOTCH MARINE INC 200.00 293681 1/10/2013 MDT PERSONNEL LLC 8,951.52 293682 1/10/2013 LINDSEY GARDENS II LTD 400.00 293683 1/10/2013 DELRAY MOTORS 300.77 293684 1/10/2013 DEPT OF HWY SAFETY&MOTOR VEHICLES 10.00 293685 1/10/2013 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS 27.00 293686 1/10/2013 ELITE TENT COMPANY 200.00 293687 1/10/2013 CIT FINANCE LLC 138.46 293688 1/10/2013 CXA 18 CORP CBRE ATF BEAL BANK 200.00 293689 1/10/2013 WILCO CONSTRUCTION INC 14,066.50 293690 1/10/2013 LUCAS FARMS 200.00 293691 1/10/2013 ELAINE KANE 90.00 293692 1/10/2013 MELINDA LOW PAMPALLONA 90.00 293693 1/10/2013 AHEAD LLC 687.96 293694 1/10/2013 GFA INTERNATIONAL INC 2,380.00 293695 1/10/2013 CM&S INDUSTRIES INC 1,530.00 293696 1/10/2013 WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC 19,145.23 293697 1/10/2013 YP LLC 159.00 293698 1/10/2013 JOSHUA GHIZ 1,649.67 293699 1/10/2013 WILLIAM EDWARD BROWN JR 775.00 293700 1/10/2013 BETHANY BURT 240.00 293701 1/10/2013 JES RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT 4,655.19 293702 1/10/2013 EXCHANGE CLUB OF VERO BEACH 200.00 293703 1/10/2013 LINDA GRAHAM 60.00 293704 1/10/2013 LEE DINENBERG 30.00 293705 1/10/2013 PAM ARNONE 30.00 293706 1/10/2013 RELECTRIC SUPPLY CO LLC 430.00 293707 1/10/2013 ELITE TITLE TREASURE COAST INC 130.82 293708 1/10/2013 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC 67.00 293709 1/10/2013 GEORGE&PATRICIA GEYER 132.16 293710 1/10/2013 ROBERT&IRENE HAAS JR 50.00 293711 1/10/2013 EAST COAST TREE CO 50.00 293712 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 39.50 293713 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 35.11 293714 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 6822 293715 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 49.69 3 15 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293716 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 44.17 293717 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 78.94 293718 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 62.86 293719 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 57.49 293720 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 40.41 �... 293721 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 325.85 293722 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 62.16 293723 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 103.88 293724 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 40.41 293725 1/10/2013 UT REFUND 47.16 293726 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 26.23 293727 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 39.50 293728 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 37.34 293729 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 36.94 293730 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 47.83 293731 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 33.88 293732 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 37.15 293733 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 41.80 293734 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 28.60 293735 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 73.58 293736 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 40.41 293737 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 55.92 2.93738 1/10/013 UT PEFUNDS 35.79 293739 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 19.07 293740 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 6822 293741 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 71.76 293742 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 325.85 293743 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 3.79 293744 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 50.09 293745 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 59.50 293746 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 11.46 293747 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 77.13 293748 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 6822 293749 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 48.89 293750 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 39.50 293751 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 26.84 293752 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 33.53 293753 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 48.89 293754 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 27.13 293755 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 9.06 293756 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 28.48 293757 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 40.41 293758 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 11.97 293759 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 62.86 293760 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 35.74 293761 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 103.76 293762 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 55.92 293763 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 2.57 293764 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 21.37 293765 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 6.80 293766 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 2828 293767 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 12.34 293768 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 73.58 293769 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 33.41 293770 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 8.60 293771 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 7.96 293772 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 73.58 293773 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 35.41 293774 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 31.51 293775 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 55.92 4 16 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293776 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 113.58 293777 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 62.86 293778 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 28.48 293779 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 66.40 293780 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 36.44 293781 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 23.43 293782 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 68.22 293783 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 36.44 293784 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 40.41 293785 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 63.72 293786 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 47.16 293787 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 21.46 293788 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 133.18 293789 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 58.01 293790 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 21.16 293791 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 41.80 293792 1/10/2013 UT REFUNDS 57.49 Grand Total: 980,234.64 5 17 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 2233 1/3/2013 FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM 317,394.58 2234 1/3/2013 LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORP 15,000.00 2235 1/4/2013 ICMA RET CORP 1,585.00 2236 1/4/2013 NACO/SOUTHEAST 20,907.91 2237 1/4/2013 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMIN 13,173.89 2238 1/4/2013 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION 12,096.30 2239 1/4/2013 FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES,INC 5,554.14 2240 1/4/2013 NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT 145.83 2241 1/4/2013 FL SDU 7,459.03 2242 1/4/2013 BENEFITS WORKSHOP 6,176.90 2243 1/4/2013 BENEFITS WORKSHOP 663.31 2244 1/7/2013 IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 393,921.41 2245 1/7/2013 IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 7,462.37 Grand Total: 801,540.67 w.. 1 18 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS. NB R DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1000637 1/4/2013 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 73.75 1000638 1/4/2013 THE GALE GROUP 254.61 1000639 1/4/2013 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 176.08 1000640 1/4/2013 APPLE MACHINE&SUPPLY CO 96.20 1000642 1/7/2013 HENRY SCHEIN INC 298.00 1000643 1/7/2013 UNIVERSAL SIGNS&ACCESSORIES 25,407.00 1000644 1/7/2013 LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC 118.48 1000645 1/7/2013 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 4,200.75 1000646 1/7/2013 MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 100.00 1000647 1/7/2013 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 105.24 1000648 1/7/2013 SVI SYSTEMS INC 198.00 1000649 1/7/2013 RELIABLE POLY JOHN 90.66 1000650 1/7/2013 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 83.84 1000651 1/8/2013 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 170.00 1000652 1/8/2013 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 85.30 1000653 1/8/2013 THE GALE GROUP 586.71 1000654 1/8/2013 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 370.51 1000655 1/8/2013 SVI SYSTEMS INC 75.00 1000656 1/8/2013 POLYDYNE INC 2,576.00 1000657 1/8/2013 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 748.39 1000658 1/8/2013 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 163.63 1000659 1/8/2013 S&S AUTO PARTS 320.59 1000660 1/8/2013 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 73,236.48 1000661 1/8/2013 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 73,236.48 1000662 1/8/2013 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 73,236.48 1000663 1/9/2013 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 60.00 1000664 1/9/2013 UNIVERSAL SIGNS&ACCESSORIES 4,556.25 1000665 1/9/2013 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 76.75 1000666 1/9/2013 MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 290.00 1000667 1/9/2013 HARCROS CHEMICALS, INC. 1,040.00 r.. 1000668 1/9/2013 S&S AUTO PARTS 815.51 1000669 1/9/2013 HYDRA SERVICE(S)INC 2,396.43 1000670 1/9/2013 AT&T 37.46 1000671 1/9/2013 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 419.70 1000672 1/9/2013 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 1,873.98 1000673 1/10/201: PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST LLC 393.28 1000674 1/10/201: LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC 75.75 1000675 1/10/201: INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 130.00 1000676 1/10/201: REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 42.92 1000677 1/10/201: MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 125.00 1000678 1/10/201 MEEKS PLUMBING INC 91.20 1000679 1/10/201. ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 429.65 1000680 1/10/201. SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC 330.19 1000681 1/10/201. CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 222.25 1000682 1/10/201. AUTO PARTNERS LLC 12.54 1000683 1/10/201. S&S AUTO PARTS 177.96 1000684 1/10/201. EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER 112.00 1000685 1/10/201. HYDRA SERVICE(S)INC 952.43 Grand Total: 270,669.43 19 JEFFREY R. SMITH 4 Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller Finance Department �ZpRIpA 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone (772) 226-1945 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller And Diane Bernardo, Finance Director DATE: January 16, 2013 SUBJECT: Dori Slosberg Driver Education Safety Act Indian River County Traffic Education Program Trust Fund BACKGROUND On August 20, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance Number 2002-026 creating the Indian River County Traffic Education Program Trust Fund (our fund 137). This ordinance authorized a $3 traffic ticket surcharge, which is collected by the Clerk of the Circuit Court. On September 19,2006, the Board adopted Ordinance 2006-035 to repeal this fine. Attached to this memo is a report of the revenues and expenditures from the inception of the $3 fee (October 1, 2002) through December 31, 2012. The Board currently carries a balance of $26,796 which is available to area schools. The Clerk's office will continue to provide a quarterly report of the traffic education trust activity until all of the funds have been spent. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the attached report. Indian River County Approved Date Administrator County Attorney Budget IIS l3 Department Risk Management R\dbernardo\Traffic Fund Bd Agenda.doc 20 r- N Indian River County, Florida Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Traffic Education Program FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FYI FYI YTD FY13 Inception 10/01/2002- 10/01/2003- 10/0112004- 10101/2005- 10/01/2006- 10/01/2007- 10/01/2008- 10/01/2009- 10/01/2010- 10/01/2011- 10/01/2012- to Date 9/30/2003 9/30/2004 9/30/2005 9/30/2006 9/30/2007 9/30/2008 9/30/2009 9/30/2010 9/30/2011 9/30/2012 12/31/2012 Totals REVENUES Fines and forfeitures $ 42,563 $ 42,225 $ 41,794 $ 48,372 $ 9,537 $ 1,575 $ 744 $ 525 $ 384 $ 213 $ 24 Interest 222 686 2,130 5,797 8,426 4,999 2,989 753 240 104 9 Total Revenues 42,785 42,911 43,924 54,169 17,963 6,574 3,733 1,278 624 317 33 $214,311 EXPENDITURES Public Safety - - - 25,188 44,373 36,210 29,962 35,317 7,565 8,900 - Total Expenditures - - - 25,188 44,373 36,210 29,962 35,317 7,565 8,900 - $187,515 Net change in fund balances 42,785 42,911 43,924 28,981 (26,410) (29,636) (26,229) (34,039) (6,941) (8,583) 33 Fund balances at beginning of year - 42,785 85,696 129,620 158,601 132,191 102,555 76,326 42,287 35,346 26,763 Fund balances at end of year 42,785 85,696 129,620 158,601 132,191 102,555 76,326 42,287 35,346 26,763 26,796 $ 26,796 School District of Indian River County $114,535 St. Edwards School $ 72,980 Total Disbursed to Date $187,515 CONSENT AGENDA January 22, 2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 14, 2013 SUBJECT: Out of County Travel to attend the 26th Annual National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology FROM: Terri Collins-Lister, Commissioner Assistant Out of county travel is requested for commissioners and staff to attend the 26th Annual National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology in Jacksonville, Florida on February 13-15, 2013. ... Attachment 22 2611 t,..' ational Conference on Technology�e�cPreservation ................. ... s F ebrur 13. 15 0 y � Hotel �+ _ ���Ilse � _ ear aF !ii "�merica's Largest Annual Conference on Beach Preservation Technolegy" on comerence t! • CONFERENCE OBJECTIVES WHO SHOULD ATTEND? U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ., To present advances in beach preservation, Natural Resource and Environmental Protection AgenciE research, and real-world-practice. Coastal Engineers and Project Contractors • To provide a technological transfer from City and County Elected and Administrative Officials the-scientific and engineering community-to City and County Environmental Resource Managers -- government-officials=who make the decisions on City and County Beach-Management Coordinato-r-s- coastal projects and policies. Inlet Districts and other Special Interest Districts Academic Researchers CON`FEREN:CE H10H'LIGHTS Legislators and Legislative staff Coastal Consultants, Businesses, and Services The Conference Planning Committee was once again Tourist Development Councils chaltenged.by the number and quality of abstracts Convention and Visitors Bureaus received this year. The final program reflects an Hotel and Resort Interests I utstanding,lineup of presentations on topics such:as Environmental Groups and Alliances hurricane:impacts; regional sediment management, General Government and Coastal/Ocean Associations hardbottom, beach nourishment, structures, sea.level Coastal Geologists and Biologists rise, inlet management, and modeling;• Coastal Residents and other Interested Citizens Some of the presentations.you can=look forward to • Two sessions devotedi to.thet issue of hardbottom and mitigation • An update..on a project involving,permeable adjustable groins • A:dredger's perspective on regionalization of beach projects • A sand relocation project.in.Miami-Dade, Florida 41 Introduction to the National Environmental Policy Y b Act for "newbies" • Corps' guidance on.incorporating sea level rise into federal project planning • Atechnicat review of the Corps FDEP Southeast Honda Se81-ment Assessment and:Needs. Deter • Pro# Augig�sctt�rero°fFl©knardaor�feerrtacoe ent e}C sirn11.Mi o i fo�YPee * �rShorePt; -• TropualS�orrn�Debby and Hurricane Isaac storm imPIPacts: There �s no shortage of exceptional presentations to Jacksonville Beach attend.and:learn from; so tom us �rr February Tor our. photo courtesy of Olsen Associates, Inc. 26th annual conference!- 24 2013 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology February 13-15 ♦ The Omni Jacksonvile Hotel ♦ Jacksonville, Florida Wednesday Afternoon, February 13 Re it Sediment Management and the St. Johns County Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring: Alternative Methods to Shb%w,'rotection Project - 2012 Renourishment -- Jason Effectively Assess Potential Impacts and Reduce Monitoring Engle, P.E. and Kelly Legault, Ph.D., U.S. Army Corps of Costs Associated with Beach Restoration Projects in Florida Engineers, Jacksonville District, FL -- Erin Hodel and others, CSA International, Inc., Stuart, FL Update on the Town of Longboat Key's Permeable Coquina Beach Restoration: An Integrated Approach to Beach Adjustable Groins Performance - Douglas Mann, P.E., Design and Artificial Reef Construction -- Michelle Rees and -Coastal Ptan-ntWEt Engineering,—lnc-. -Boca Raton, FIL others; Coastal Planning- @t--Engineering,-Inc.-,-Boca-Raton-,-FL-20 Years of Beach Nourishment: The Sea Bright to Nearshore Rock Exposure at Patrick AFB, Florida, 2001-12 -- Manasquan, NJ Storm Damage Reduction Project, 1994 Kevin Bodge, Ph.D., P.E. and others, Olsen Associates, Inc., to 2013 -- Lynn Bocamazo, P.E., U.S. Army Corps of Jacksonville, FL Engineers, New York District, NY Hardbottom Impacts and Mitigation: Developing a Persistent St. Lucie Inlet Impacts on Northern Jupiter Island: Policy on an Ephemeral Situation -- Danielle Fondren, PWS Interpretation Based on Shoreline Position Data -- and Lainie Edwards, Ph.D., Florida Department of Robert Dean, Ph.D., P.E., Department of Civil and Coastal Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, FL Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Hardbottom Panel Discussion and Audience Participation Thursday Morning, February 14 ♦ CONCURRENT-SESSIONS SESSION A SESSION B Predicting Hardbottom Impacts for Beach Fills in Southeast Coastal Engineering Indices to Inform Regional Management Florida -- Christopher Creed, P.E. and Patrick Snyder, -- Lauren Dunkin and others, Joint Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Olsen Associates, Inc., Jacksonville, FL Technical Center of Expertise, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Kiln, MS Har ' )ttom Impacts: Bridging the Gap Between Science an�;ulatory, A Case Study: South St. Lucie County Beach Analysis and Utilization of Long-Term Nearshore`Nave Data Restoration Project -- Kimberly Colstad and Lois Edwards, at a Beach Nourishment Project -- William Dally, Ph.D., P.E., Coastal Technology Corp., Vero Beach, FL Surfbreak Engineering Sciences, Inc. and Atkins North America, Inc., Orlando, FL Benthic Characterization Using a Stratified Random Sampling Design Supplemented with LiDAR Data: An Wave Force Guidance for Coastal Structures Vulnerable to Example from Broward County-- Stacy Prekel, Coastal Coastal Storms-- Michael Krecic, P.E. and others, Ocean Planning Et Engineering, Inc., Boca Raton, FL and Kenneth Engineering Associates, Inc. and D. Max Sheppard, Ph.D., Banks, Ph.D., P.E. and others, Broward County, FL Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Design Considerations for Beach Nourishment Projects in the Vicinity of Nearshore Hardbottom -- Michael Jenkins, St. Lucie Plant Discharge Canal Headwall Stabilization Project, Ph.D., P.E., Applied Technology and Management, Inc., St. Lucie County, Florida -- Jonathan Armbruster, P.E., Taylor West Palm Beach, FL Engineering, Inc., Jacksonville, FL Hardbottom Panel Discussion and Audience Participation Breakwater Island Creation: A 3-Fold System -- Jesse Davis, P.E., Tetra Tech, Inc., Stuart, FL; and others SESSION C SESSION D New Technology in Beach Building --Thomas Payne, Cortez Groins Reconstruction Project Feasibility Study and Marinex Construction, Inc., Charleston, SC and Robert 2012 Hurricane Season Impacts -- Charlie Hunsicker, Natural Roman, Hydrographic Consultants, Ltd., Bellaire, TX Resources Department, Manatee County, FL and Thomas Pierro, P.E. and others, Coastal Planning It Engineering, Inc., Boca Regionalization Issues from a Dredgers Perspective -- Raton, FL Sam Morrison and Bill Hanson, Great Lakes Dredge and Coastal Engineering Italian Style -- Gary Zarillo, Ph.D., Dock Co., Oak Brook, IL Department of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Nc,,r,,.e Beach Restoration, Santa Rosa County, FL-- Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL Tem Fontaine, P.E. and others, Coastal Technology Rehabilitation of the Breakers Hotel T-head Groin Field -- Corp., Vero Beach, FL Gordon Thomson, P.E. and others, Coastal Planning Et Engineering, Inc., Boca Raton, FL pQnGaAM WITH SPECIFIC TIMES WILL BE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT WWW.FsBPA.COM 2 5 2013 National Conference on Beach Preservation Technology February 13-15 ♦ The Omni Jacksonville Hotel ♦ Jacksonville, Florida Thursday Afternoon, February 14 ♦ CONCURRENT-SESSIONS SESSION E SESSION F 14%W "NEPA for Newbies" -The National Environmental Policy Act Venice Inlet Flood Shoal Sand Trap Hydrodynamic Analysis -- - an Overview --Terri Jordan-Sellers and Leah Oberlin, U.S. Marc Damon, P.E. and Brett Moore, P.E., Humiston Et Moore Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, FL Engineers, Naples, FL Stockpiled Aragonite: A Test of the Potential for Transport St. Lucie Inlet, Review of Original 1981 Structure Design —of-L-ive-Benthic—Infauna---Sharon-Niemczyk, Cardno ENTRIX, Goals, and Discussion of Project_Performance -- Kenneth _ Wellington, FL; and others Humiston, P.E., Humiston ft Moore Engineers, Naples, FL Developments in Policy and Practice of Coastal Dune Inlet Management - Closed Inlet Lessons --Tem Fontaine, P.E. Restoration and Management -- Robert Barron, Coastal and Todd Walton, Ph.D., P.E., Coastal Technology Corp., Vero Growers, Inc., Boynton Beach, FL Beach, FL Dune Vegetation Management, A Case Study -- Jennifer Inlet Management and Sediment Budget Analyses at Perdido Bistyga, City of Boca Raton, FL and John Duchock, P.E., Pass, Orange Beach, AL--Albert Browder, Ph.D., P.E. and Applied Technology and Management, Inc., West Palm others, Olsen Associates, Inc., Jacksonville, FL Beach, FL SESSION G SESSION H Numerical Modeling of Coastal Processes and Sedimentation Multitemporal Lidar Assessment of Hurricane Ike Impact and at Braddock Bay, NY-- Lihwa Lin, Ph.D. and others, Coastal Recovery Along the Upper Texas Coast -- Michael Starek, and Hydraulics Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research Ph.D. and others, Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS and Michael Mohr, Studies, Texas AEtM University-Corpus Christi, TX P.E., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District, NY Storm-Induced Dune Erosion: Field vs. Model Results --Adam Coastal Storm Surge Risk Assessment for the U.S. Mid- Clinch and Margery Overton, Ph.D., North Carolina State A*' tic Coast -- Jeffrey Hanson, Ph.D., U.S. Army Corps University, Raleigh, NC o 'ineers, Field Research Facility, Kitty Hawk, NC; and 0Mers Morphologic Changes Induced by Tropical Storm Debby along Several West-Central Florida Barrier Islands -- Ping Wang, Coastal Storm Modeling -- Chris Massey, Ph.D., Coastal Ph.D., Department of Geology, University of South Florida, Hydraulics Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Tampa, FL and Tiffany Roberts, Ph.D., Department of Geology Development Center, Vicksburg, MS Et Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA The US Navy Coastal Surge and Inundation Prediction Impacts to Southwest Florida's Beaches from Tropical Storm System: Making Forecasts Easier --Andrew Condon, Ph.D., Debby and Hurricane Isaac -- Michael Poff, P.E., Coastal American Society for Engineering Education and Jay Engineering Consultants, Inc., Naples, FL; and others Veeramony, Ph.D., Oceanography Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Stennis Space Center, MS Friday Morning, February 15 Southeast Florida Sediment Assessment and Needs Ft. Pierce Inlet Sand Bypassing and Shoreline Stabilization Determination (SAND) Report -- Matt Schrader, P.E. Overview, St. Lucie County, Florida -- Michael Trudnak, P.E., and Jase Oustey, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Taylor Engineering, Inc., Jacksonville, FL Jacksonville District, FL Sebastian Inlet Coconut Point Shoreline Stabilization Project Sand Relocation Project- Miami-Dade County, Florida -- Bryan Flynn, P.E., Atkins North America, Inc., Tampa, FL; and Tom Martin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville others District, FL Evaluation of Beach Fill Grain Size Influence on Sediment Effects of Sea Level Decadal Variability on Apparent Transport and Beach Fill Evolution -- Mohamed Dabees, Ph.D., Acceleration and Trend Difference -- James Houston, P.E. and Brett Moore, P.E., Humiston Et Moore Engineers, Ph.D., U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Naples, FL r -r, Vicksburg, MS and Robert Dean, Ph.D., P.E., 1.. ,..rtment of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University Sustainable Coastal Protection and Management Program, of Florida, Gainesville, FL Maharashtra, India -- Rajesh Srinivas, Ph.D., P.E., Taylor Engineering, Inc., Jacksonville, FL; and others Sea Level Change Considerations on Federal Projects -- Jason Engle, P.E., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, FL 26 • ® ' • . • s • Hotel • • CONFERENCE REGISTRATION Early Registration Regular Registration through January 11, 2013 after January 11, 2013 Member Registration $325 Member Registration $375 Non-Member Registration $375 Non-Member Registration $425 Student Registration $125 Student Registration $125 * must provide valid student ID with registration HOW TO REGISTER Cancellations To register, go to www.fsbpa.com/tech registration.htm Cancellation requests must be made in writing You can register online or print out a registration form and received on or before January 30, 2013. and e-mail, fax, or mail to us at the address below. A $50 processing fee will be assessed. Send ____ _ requests to mail@fsbpa.com. For more -formation--on the conference and sponsorship/exhibit opportunities, please contact: Ten Besse Conferen_ce Manager Florida Engineers who attend and sign in FSBPA at the registration desk are eligible to PQ Box;4314fi receive CEU's. FSBPA's exempt Tallahassee, FL 32317 provider number is EXP 0003914. Phone:: :(850).906 9227 Fax (850):201 61782 r 'Vfsbpa::com 1, Www fsbpa com HOTEL RESERVATIONS Make your reservation directly with the hotel Omni Jacksonville 245 Water Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Standard Room: $129 single/double, plus taxes if Reservations: (800)-843-6664 To receive the group rate, please mention FSBPA OR Make your reservation online at www.fsbpa.com/techhotel.htm To ensure that a room is available, reservations MUST be made by January 11, 2013. After this date, rooms MAY NOT be available. Thlepe is a $10 Valet parking fee for overnight guests. Check-In: 3:00 p.m. Check-Out: 12 noon 27 • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Dire4Mnager9V Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine Michael D. Nixon, P.E., Roadway Production FROM: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Project Engineer SUBJECT: Work Order No. 2 with Ardaman and Associates, Inc. for Professional Geotechnical Services for 43rd Avenue and SR 60 Intersection Improvements (18th Street to 26th Street) IRC Project No. 0853 DATE: January 8, 2-013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On March 3, 2012 the Board of County Commissioners approved the renewal of an annual agreement for Professional Geotechnical Services,with Ardaman and Associates,Inc.for various geotechnical services for Indian River County. The purpose of Work Order No. 2 is to provide contamination assessment services for the right- of-way acquisition and construction of 43rd Avenue and SR 60 Intersection Improvements. The Florida Department of Transportation is purchasing the necessary right-of-way to improve the intersection of 43rd Avenue and SR 60 and requires a contamination assessment report to finalize the right-of-way acquisition prior to construction. Ardaman and Associates, Inc. has submitted a proposal outlined in the attached Work Order No. 2 and Proposal for Preliminary Contamination Assessment Services (Exhibit A) for a not-to-exceed amount of $60,748.50. Services will be performed on an as needed basis and payment will be in accordance with the fee schedule approved by the BCC on March 3rd, 2012 and attached as part of Exhibit A. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available from Optional Sales Tax, Right of Way, Account Number 31521441-066120-06041—43rd Avenue, 181h Street to 26th Street. 28 Page 2 43rd Avenue and SR 60 Intersection Improvements—(18th Street to 26th Street) Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Project Engineer For January 22, 2013 BCC Meeting ,%NW RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 2 to Ardaman and Associates, Inc. authorizing the above-mentioned professional services as outlined in the attached Proposal for Preliminary Contamination Assessment Services (Exhibit A) and requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Work Order No. 2 on their behalf for a not-to-exceed amount of$60,748.50. ATTACHMENTS 1. Work Order No. 2 with Ardaman and Associates, Inc. 2, Exhibit A—Proposal for Preliminary Contamination Assessment Services and PCA Cost Estimate DISTRIBUTION 1. Dan J. Zrallack, P.E., Ardaman and Associates, Inc. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR January 22, 2013 B Indian River County Approved Date Administration 1/n/o Budget Legal Public Works Engineering 29 Board of County Commissioners 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (772) 567-8000 FAX: (772)-778-9391 Field and Laboratory Quality Control (QC) for 43'd Avenue and SR 60 Intersection Improvements, (18th Street to 26th Street) IRC Project No. 0853 WORK ORDER NO. 2(Engineering Division) FOR FOR PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT RFQ No. 2010021 WITH ARDAMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. All services performed under this contract shall be supervised and certified by a licensed Professional Engineer(PE) registered with the State of Florida and staff employed directly with your firm. Scope of Services All work shall be performed on a unit price or hourly basis in accordance with the attached Proposal for Preliminary Contamination Assessment Services (Exhibit A) dated November 29, 2012 and shall comply with Standards enumerated in the ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT RFQ 2010021 WITH ARDAMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Effective Renewal Date: March 3,2012. Minimum Specification Requirements as follows: Soil Sampling Soil Screening and Testing Groundwater Sampling and Testing Laboratory testing Preliminary Contamination Assessment Report All work shall also comply with the current Florida Minimum Technical Standards. F:Pub1w RXor1cslF\G1NEERIN(3 DIVISION PR03FUS`,()fs53-43td AVE 19th ST to 35th S7 i.;rcadis)tAdmimlContracts'.Ardaman&Associstc,�a—&WO#?ARDA3]AN 1-9- 13.dec 30 WO#2 43rd Avenue and SR 60 Intersection Improvements, (18th Street to 26th Street) IRC Project No. 0853 COMPENSATION. The COUNTY agrees to pay,and the Geotechnical Professional agrees to accept,a fee for services rendered according to the"Scope of Services" identified in the attached EXHIBIT"A" Proposal for Preliminary Contamination Assessment Services. A Not-to-Exceed Amount of: 60 748.50 to be paid on a unit price or hourly basis for actual work performed in accordance with the schedule of services and fees set forth in Exhibit A of RENEWAL OF THE ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT RFQ 2010021 WITH ARDAMAN AND ASSOCIATES INC. Effective Date: March 3, 2012 TIME FOR COMPLETION This Work Order No.2 will run approximately 3-months from notice to proceed. IN WITNESS HEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents This day of , 2013. OWNER ARDAMAN&ASSOCIATES,INC. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher,Chairman Dan .Zrailac c,P.E., Branch Manager Approved by BCC Wit ed by: ATTEST: Jeffrey R.Smith,Clerk of Court& Comptroller Deputy Clerk ,L� L Approved as to Form and Legpl Sufficiency: Alan S. Polacicwich,Sr.,County seph A Baird,County Administrator Attorney arr.. F:'Ytthlic WmksFNGfNEERMG DIVISION NROIEC7:4�,Os53-43rd AVE 18th ST to 261h SF tA:radi=_jA�n}im\CuatrnctsSirda;n:ia t Associat&Zt;c)&WO,!2 ARDAMAN 1.8_ B.&C 31 EWV Ardaman & Associates, Inc. November 29, 2012 Ardaman Proposal No. 12-3836 Revised January 14, 2013 Me% Geot�r,Y;nirat;Fr•;iroranental slid MaterialConsultants `ww Indian River County Engineering Division 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3388 Attention: Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, P.E. Subject: Proposal for Preliminary Contamination Assessment Intersection of State Road 60 (20th Street) and 43`d Avenue Indian River County, Florida Mr. Weragoda: As requested, Ardaman & Associates, Inc. (Ardaman) has prepared a scope of work and estimation of costs related to performing a preliminary assessment of subsurface contamination at the above referenced site. This proposal includes soil and groundwater sampling and testing to explore for the presence of soil and/or groundwater contamination along areas of the project site relative to several potential sources of contamination identified as a result of a contamination screening evaluation that was performed by others. If additional sampling and testing is necessary, then additional work beyond the limited scope of work outlined herein will be proposed. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Indian River County plans to improve the intersection of State Road 60 (20th Street) and 43rd Avenue in Indian River County, Florida. The proposed improvements include widening of the roadways from the existing four-lane to provide for a six-lane divided roadway with median, curb and gutter on the median side and resurfacing of the existing pavement. Arcadis completed a Contamination Screening Evaluation Report (CSER)for the project study area in February 2007. The project study area extends up to the existing bridge over the Main Relief Canal to the north and west and for approximately 2,200 feet to the south and east from the intersection. The purpose of the CSER was to identify and evaluate sites with known or potential for contamination within the project study area. Twelve sites were identified in the CSER as having "medium" and "high" potential for contamination. Based on the results of the CSER, limited soil and groundwater assessment in the right-of-way expansion areas adjacent to sites ranked as "high" and "medium" was recommended. In addition, discussions with Indian River County staff indicated that construction activities associated with the proposed roadway improvements such as underground utility installations, dewatering, etc. also need to be considered within the existing right-of-way areas where no right-of-way expansion is planned. PROJECT APPROACH The following scope of work describes the tasks necessary to preliminarily explore for the presence of contamination in soils and groundwater in the limited areas of the project study area, specifically at locations adjacent to the sites identified in the CSER as having"medium"and"high" potential for contamination. We note that the project limits have been reduced to the north and west; and therefore, additional exploration relative to the Keith's Oil Can, Brook's Residence and the Dodger Pines Country Club sites will not be included in this study. 408 d�'•v�'Concourse Plac:,Unit 1,Port St.Luce;Florida 34986 Phone(772,878-0072 =ax?72}878-0097 Florida:Bartow,Cocoa,Fort tlye t lanii,d':ando Port St.Lucie,Sarasota,Tallahassee.Taro Wcs"t Palm Beach Lcuis;ana:Alexandria,Batch Rouge,F,`onroe,New Greans,Shre•.eoort 32 PCA- Intersection of SR 60 and 43rd Avenue - 2 - Ardaman Proposal No. 12-3836 I. Preliminary Contamination Assessment The initial assessment activities and laboratory analyses described below are designed to preliminarily explore subsurface conditions, and adhere to the criteria established in FAC 62-770. All samples collected during this assessment will be provided to a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) certified laboratory for analysis. The proposed environmental activities will produce various investigation-derived wastes (IDW) including but not limited to: decontamination fluids; soil cuttings;well development water; and well purge water. We have assumed that IDW can be handled as non-hazardous. For budgetary purposes, we have included an allowance for drumming IDW as necessary. A. Soil Sampling, Soil Screening and Analytical Testing Up to 70 auger borings will be conducted to a depth of 2 to 3 feet below the encountered groundwater table or to a maximum depth of 7 feet at accessible locations within the existing and/or proposed right-of-way expansion areas adjacent to the sites identified in the CSER as having "medium" and "high" potential for contamination. The auger borings will be conducted using a 3-inch diameter, hand-held bucket auger. Soil samples will. be obtained during performance of the borings at approximate- 2-foot intervals. These samples will be placed in 16-ounce glass sample jars, half-filled, in general accordance with FAC 62-770. A sample of soil gas will be withdrawn using the vacuum pump of an organic vapor analyzing (OVA) device (Century 128 OVA). Soil samples collected will also be observed for indications of stains, sheens and unusual odors. A summary of the proposed number and approximate location of the borings is provided in the following table. Site Address(Proximity to Intersection) Proposed Number and Location of Borings Mark's Mobil 4310 20'"Street(Northwest Comer) Four along 43rd Avenue and four along 20`"Street Former Texaco/Lenny's Lounge 4315 20'"Street(Southwest Comer) Four along 43rd Avenue and four along 20d'Street Former FINA#6644/Mobil 4395 20d'Street(200 Feet West) Four along 201"Street Former Union 76 4233 201"Street(Southeast Comer) Four along 43id Avenue and four along 20'h Street Cumberland Farms 1925 43rd Avenue(500 Feet South) Four along 43d Avenue Indian River Farms WCD 4400 20'"Street(Northwest Comer) Four along 43d Avenue and four along 201"Street Quick Snack and Coin Laundry 4236 20'"Street(Northeast Comer) Four along 43rd Avenue and four along 20'"Street Mermaid Car Wash 1935 43rd Avenue(450 Feet South) Three along 43rd Avenue Strip Shopping Center 4201 -4211 201"Street(200 Feet East) Five along 201"Street (Vero Beach Dry Cleaners) In addition, up to 12 soil samples will be collected from select boring locations for chemical analyses. The samples will be "grab" samples obtained from locations and depths that will be determined based on the results of the soils screening and/or proximity to sites most likely believed to have contamination. The samples will be submitted for chemical analyses by EPA Methods 8020 and 8270 and for TRPH by the FL-PRO method. Additionally, up to six of the samples will also be analyzed by EPA Method 8010. B. Groundwater Sampling Wells lftw Temporary groundwater sampling wells will be installed at locations determined based on findings during the assessment. For budgeting purposes, we have preliminarily assumed up to 26 shallow wells (to a maximum depth of 10 feet) will be needed to explore for the presence of groundwater contamination. The locations of the wells and actual depths will be determined 33 PCA - Intersection of SR 60 and 43rd Avenue - 3 - Ardaman Proposal No. 12-3836 after additional data is gathered relative to groundwater levels and subsurface stratigraphy. The proposed shallow wells will be constructed of 2-inch diameter, 0.01-inch slotted schedule 40 PVC pipe. A summary of the proposed number and approximate location of the wells is provided in the following table. Site Address(Proximity to Intersection) Proposed Number and Location of Wells Mark's Mobil 4310 201h Street(Northwest Corner) Two along 43d Avenue and two along 20"Street Former Texaco/Lenny's Lounge 4315 201h Street(Southwest Comer) Two along 43rd Avenue and one along 20"'Street Former FINA#6644/Mobil 4395 201h Street(200 Feet West) Two along 20`h Street Former Union 76 4233 201h Street(Southeast Comer) Two along 43`d Avenue and one along 201h Street Cumberland Farms 1925 43rd Avenue(500 Feet South) Two along 43`d Avenue Indian River Farms WCD 4400 201h Street(Northwest Comer) One along 43`d Avenue and two along 20'"Street Quick Snack and Coin Laundry 4236 20"'Street(Northeast Corner) Two along 43d Avenue and one along 20"Street Mermaid Car Wash 1935 43rd Avenue(450 Feet South) One along 43rd Avenue Strip Shopping Center 4201 -4211 20`h Street(200 Feet East) One along 20'h Street (Vero Beach Dry Cleaners) We note that permanent groundwater monitoring wells are not being proposed at this time since the locations will likely be disrupted during construction activities. 'Additional permanent groundwater monitoring wells may be proposed to monitor groundwater contamination levels and migration during construction if deemed appropriate based on the results of the PCA. C. Groundwater Sample Collection and Analysis Groundwater samples obtained from the wells will be collected for laboratory analysis in accordance with FDEP sampling requirements. Groundwater samples collected from the wells will be submitted to a State certified laboratory for analysis by EPA Methods 8021 and 8270, and the FL-PRO method. II. Preliminary Contamination Assessment Report (PCAR) A report summarizing the above preliminary site assessment activities will be submitted upon completion of the above-described scope of work. Details, descriptions and rationales for the various site assessment activities will be presented, along with all data developed during the assessment activities. The report will include the results of our findings relative to any identified soil and/or groundwater contamination within the study area that may present limitations or require special monitoring of contaminated media during construction of the proposed intersection widening project. COST ESTIMATE This proposal contains general methodology and procedures for conducting a limited PCAR for the subject site. The quantity of items contained in this plan may vary depending on the findings during performance of the assessment (e.g.; number of samples and wells, depths of monitoring wells, etc.). Consulting fees will be charged on a time and materials basis using the unit prices listed in this proposal. We have prepared the attached cost estimate for completing the scope of work as outlined above. The cost for these services will not exceed $60,748.50 without prior approval from the client. low 34 PCA- Intersection of SR 60 and 43d Avenue _ 4 Ardaman Proposal No. 12-3836 It is important to realize that the project budget is a function of the findings during the study, additional assessment activities deemed necessary and the result of FDEP's and/or FDOT's review of the PCAR. It is noted that the project will be completed in stages to minimize the amount of `"" work, and therefore project costs. The client will only be billed for the actual worked performed and services provided. CLOSURE This proposal is subject to the following terms and conditions: (1)access to boring locations is to.be readily available to our drilling equipment; (2) maintenance-of-traffic will not be necessary; (3) Ardaman & Associates cannot take responsibility for damages to underground structures and/or utilities not identified through the Sunshine State One-Call service; their locations are to be provided by the client prior to commencement of the field work; (4) coordinating and obtaining written permission/agreements from adjacent property owners as necessary in order to access the boring and well locations is the responsibility of the client; and (5) this scope of service and associated cost includes a limited allowance for drumming, containing or disposing of contaminated soils, groundwater or drilling fluids. We will notify you immediately if it becomes apparent that additional funds will be needed for this effort. We note that services proposed within may be substituted in the field, as conditions dictate. The number of samples, sampling locations and depths and laboratory tests may be modified in the field to provide the same (or higher) level of service regarding exploring for potential subsurface contamination. However, as stated above, the indicated cost will not be exceeded without prior permission. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to continue working with you on this project. If this proposal is agreeable to you, please indicate your acceptance by issuing the change order that will be assigned to this phase of the project. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Best regards, ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Qar� rallack, P.E. Branch Manager 35 CLIENT: Indian River County 'OJECT: Intersection of State Road 60(20th Street)and 43rd Avenue,Vero Beach,Florida ;CRIPTION: Preliminary Contamination Assessment TOTAL PROJECT COST: $60,748.50 NUMBER COST PER NUMBE COST PER ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS UNITS UNIT EXTENSION ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS UNITS UNIT EXTENSION PERSONNEL GENERAL FIELD EQUIPMENT AND EXPENDABLES Principal Engineer Per Hour $165.00 Data Logger 99 Per Day $390.00 Senior Project Manager Per Hour 4 $135.00 $540.00 Organic Vapor Analyzer(FID or PID) Per Day 7 $164.00 $1,148.00 Project Manager Per Hour $135.00 Generator Per Day 1 $95.00 $95.06 Senior Project Engineer/Geologist Per Hour 80 $115.00 $9,200.00 Pressure Washer Per Day $190.00 Project Engineer/Geologist III Per Hour $95.00 Surveying Equipment(Water Table Elevs) Per Day $78.00 Project Engineer/Geologist I Per Hour1 $95.00 Centrifugal Development Pump Per Day $61.00 Assistant Project Engineer/Geologist Per Hour $85.00 Submersible Development Pump Per Day $250.00 Senior Field Technician IV Per Hour 80 $52.00 $4,160.00 Peristaltic Purging Pump Per Day 7 $40.00 $280.00 Field Technician III Per Hour 40 $52.00 $2,080.001 Magnetometer Per Day $62.00 Field Technician II Per-Hour $44.00 Water Level IndicatorPer Day 7 $20.00 $140.00 Senior Technical Draftsman Per Hour 12 $52.00 $624.00 Product/Water Interface Probe Per Day $82.00 Technical Draftsman Per Hour $44.00 pH/conductivity Meter Per Day 7 $25.00 $175.00 Technical Secretary Per Hour 6 $42.00 $252.00 Turbidity Meter Per Day 7 $55.00 $385.00 Subtotal: $16,856.00 Dissolved Oxygen Meter Per Day. 7 $105.00 $735.00 Bailer Usage(Stainless Steel or Teflon-Per Each) Per Day $28.00 DRILLING Concrete Saw Per Day $140.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION Concrete Coring Machine Per Day 2 $125.00 $250.00 Men and Equipment(lump sum) Per Mob. 1 $250.00 $250.001 EnCore Soil Sampler(5 gram) Each $25.00 Lump Sum Men and Equipment Mob. Per Mob. $500.00 Disposable Teflon Bailer Each $27.00 Mileage-Rig Per Mile $1.10 Disposable Polyethylene Bailer Each $17.00 Mileage-Truck Per Mile $0.60 High Capacity(1.0 micron)Filter Each $29.00 Mileage-Automobile Per Mile $0.44 16 oz.Soil Jars(soil gas analysis) Per Box 20 $10.00 $200.0 AUGER BORINGS Tygon Tubing Per Foot 20 $2.50 $50.00 Hand Auger Borings(Two-Man Crew) Per Hour 70 1 $145.00 $10,150.00 Polyethylene Tubing Per Foot 450 $0.60 $270.00 Auger Borings(4-inch) Per LF $10.25 Isopropyl Alcohol(decontamination) Per Gal. $19.00 SPT BORINGS(ASTM D-1586)in Soil(N-values<50): Deionized Water(decontamination) Per 5 Gal.1 $14.00 from surface to 25 feet Per LF $15.00 55-gallon Drum Each 20 $65.00 $1,300.0 from 25 feet to 50 feet Per LF $16.75 Visqueen(100 Feet by 20 Feet) Per Roll $720.00 tom 50 feet to 100 feet Per LF $18.75 Well or Piezometer Materials Estimated Per Well 26 $100.00 $2,600.0 1 100 feet to 125 feet Per LF $23.75 Miscellaneous Equip.&Expend.,Estimated EUMP Su 4 $50.00 $200.00 n 125 feet to 150 feet Per LF $31.50 Subtotal: $7,828.00 ADDITIONAL SAMPLES FOR CONTINUOUS SPT SAMPLING: COMPACTION AND CLASSIFICATION TESTS from 10 feet to 25 feet Per Sample $29.00 Proctor,Standard or Modified Per Test 1 $102.00 from 25 feet to 50 feet Per Sample $32.00 Moisture Content(ASTM D-2216) Per Test $13.00 from 50 feet to 100 feet Per Sample $36.00 Sieve Analysis(ASTM D-421,D-422) Per Test $45.50 from 100 feet to 125 feet Per Sample $41.00 Percent Fines(ASTM D-1140) Per Test $30.50 from 125 feet to 150 feet Per Sample $51.00 Subtotal: $0.00 ASH BORINGS AND UNDISTURBED SOIL SAMPLING 3"Wash Borings in Sol-Cuttings Only Per LF $7.50 LABORATORY ANALYSIS AND OTHER SUBCONTRACTED SERVICES Shelby Tube Per Sample $130.00 EPA 602/8021 VOA's Only-water Per Test $69.00 Fixed-Piston Shelby,Osterberg,Pitcher Per Sample $158.00 EPA 602/8021 VOA's Only-soil Per Test 6 $97.75 $586.50 FURNISH,INSTALL,and REMOVE CASING(up to 4-inch) EPA 8260B VOA's&VOH's-water Per Test 26 $126.50 $3,289.00 from surface to 50 feet Per LF $9.00tPA 8260B VOA's&VOH's-sol Per Test 6 $161.00 $966.00 from 50 feet to 100 feetPer LF $1125 EPA 601/8021 VOH's Only-water Per Test $8625 from 100 feet to 150 feet Per LF $14.00 EPA 601/8021 VOH's Only-soil Per Test $109.25 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION EPA 624/8260 Volatiles-water Per Test $149.50 Temporary 2"PVC Well(Piezometer) Per Foot 260 $18.00 $4,680.00 EPA 624/8260 Volatiles-soil Per Test $161.00 2-inch PVC Per Foot $29.00 EPA81 GO PAH's-water or soil Per Test $126.50 44nch PVC Per Foot $40.00 EPA 8270 PAH's-water Per Test 26 $126.50 $3,289.00 Double-Cased PVC Well(2"/6") Per Foot $50.00 EPA 8270 PAH's-soil Per Test 12 $138.00 $1,656.00 8"Circular Well Manhole w/Pad Per Each $275.00 EPA 625/8270 Semi-Vors-water or soil Per Test $287.50 12"Circular Well Manhole w/Pad Per Each $300.00 TPH by FL-PRO-water or soil Per Test 38 $115.00 $4,370.00 Above Ground Riser w/Pad Per Each $300.00 EPA 504 EDB-water or soil Per Test $57.50 DRILLING ON TIME BASIS Table B,FAC 62-770 water Per Test $402.50 Drilling-2 man-crew Per Hour $170.00 Table B,FAC 62-770 soil ---Per Test $276.00 Dulling-3 man-crew Per Hour $205.00 Table C,FAC 62-770 water Per Test $667.00 OTHER RELATED DRILLING CHARGES Table C,FAC 62-770 sol Per Test $667.00 Hole Location&Set-Up Per Hour $169.00 Virgin Pre-Bum(petroleum) Per Test $230.00 Decontamination of Equipment Per Hour 4 $170.00 $680.00 Non-Virgin Pre-Bum(petroleum) Per Test $287.50 Drumming Contaminated Soil(w/o Disp) Per Drum 20 1 $150.00 $3,000.001 EPA 608/8081 Cl pestJPCB's Per Test $10925 Drum Disposal(non hazardous) Per Drum 20 $155.00 $3,100.001 EPA 6010 Metals except Hg(each) Per Test $11.50 Standby Time Per Hour $169.00 RCRA Metals by EPA 6010 Per Test $10925 Bore Hole Grouting and Sealing(plus material Per Hour $185.00 TCLP/SPLP Extraction by EPA 1311/1312 Per Test $4025 Lodging and Subsistence Per Crewman Per Day $108.00 EPA TO-14-air Per Test $172.50 All Terrain Vehicle Add'VLF $1.00 EPA 18-air Per Test $115.00 "Tell Permits Per Each $100.00 Lab Waste Disposal Fee Lump Su 4 $12.00 $48.00 Subtotal: $21,860.00 Subtotal: $14,204.5 12-3836 PCA Cost Estimate.xlsx Page 1 of 1 Printed 11/29/2012 at 2:26 PM 36 CONSENTITEM D INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator D TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Ro ert M. Keating,MCP Community Development kirector FROM: Roland M. DeBlois,AICP— Chief, Environmental Planning DATE: January 14, 2013 RE: Approval of Amendment 1 to a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. for Remediation of Contamination at the Shadowbrook Estates Parcel of the South Prong Preserve Conservation Area It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners formally consider the following information at NOW- the Board's regular meeting of January 22, 2013. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS In 2007, the County acquired 29 acres known as the Shadowbrook Estates parcel with environmental land bond funds. The property is located at 7775 85`h Street (a.k.a. CR 510) and is part of the South Prong Preserve Conservation Area. Prior to closing on the purchase, the County obtained an Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property that identified limited soil and groundwater contamination. To address the limited contamination issue, the previous owner entered into an escrow agreement with the County to pay for remediation work. That escrow agreement was modified under a settlement approved by the County Commission on December 13, 2011, whereby the previous owner disbursed $100,000 to the County to be used to finish development of a remediation plan and to achieve regulatory closure with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). On March 5, 2012, the County entered into an agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) to conduct the work (see Attachment 2 to this report). Since March 2012, KHA has coordinated with FDEP and county staff, has conducted groundwater and soil testing, and has submitted several reports to the FDEP to address FDEP staff requests for additional information (RAI). Although there has been progress made in moving toward regulatory closure with the FDEP, additional sampling and reporting is necessary that will result in certain costs beyond the original agreement with KHA. For that reason, an amendment to the KHA agreement (Attachment 1 to this report) is herein presented for the Board's approval consideration. 37 ANALYSIS The March 2012 professional services agreement with KHA was for $41,200 (accounting for an estimate for sampling expenses). The proposed amendment to the agreement will extend that amount by$8,500 for consultant services and an estimated $3,000 for sampling expenses. As such, the amendment will increase the agreement cost by $11,500, bringing the total to an estimated $52,700 (i.e., 52.7% of the $100,000 earmarked for this project). Funding In accordance with the December 2011 escrow agreement settlement with the previous landowner, $100,000 has been earmarked for this work. The current balance of the earmarked funds remaining for the work is $55,039.11, an amount which amply covers the $11,500 cost amendment to the KHA agreement to address FDEP's requirement of additional testing and reporting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Amendment 1 to the KHA Agreement for professional services relating to the Shadowbrook Estates parcel remediation and authorize the County Administrator to sign the Amendment on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Amendment 1 to Agreement. 2. KHA Professional Services Agreement. APPROVED: I.R.County ved Date Admin. FOR: January 22,2013 Legal j Budget Dept. Risk Mgr. Y��44 I i—,&4� 2 F:\Community Development\Users\ROLAND\LAAO\South Prong Preserve\Shadowbrook Estates parcel\KHA Amend to Agree BCC staff report for 1-22-13.doc 38 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Nam- AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CLIENT AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 DATED January 9, 2013 to the agreement between Indian River County,("Client")and Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc.,("Consultant")dated February 22,2012("the Agreement")concerning Shadowbrook Estates,Inc. (the "Project"). The Consultant has entered into the Agreement with Client for the furnishing of professional services,and the parties now desire to amend the Agreement. Therefore, it is mutually agreed that the Agreement is amended to include Additional Services to be performed by Consultant and provisions for additional compensation by the Client to the Consultant, all as set forth in Exhibit A hereto. The parties ratify the terms and conditions of the Agreement not inconsistent with this Amendment, all of which are incorporated by reference. CLIENT: CONSULTANT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY KIMLEY-HORN A C�TES, INC. By. By. ��� t. Joseph A. Baird Title: County Administrator Title: Senior Vice President Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORIv: A B l'N DrJS ! 7C' / , /, WILLIAM K.DEBRAAL DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY 1100' ATTACHMENT 1 39 Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. Exhibit A to Amendment Number 1, dated January 9, 2013 Project Understanding In response to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's(FDEP)December 11,2012 correspondence, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) will conduct additional ground water sampling at the Shadowbrook Estates Site (the "Site"). The Consultant shall perform the following Additional Services: Task 1—Ground Water Sampling The existing monitoring wells at the Northeast Grove and Southwest Grove will be re-sampled for total dissolved solids, arsenic and/or lead. Ground water sampling will be performed in accordance with the FDEP's Standard Operating Procedures. KHA will provide notification to the FDEP's Southeast District 48-hours prior to commencement of the ground water sampling. Depth to ground water measurements will be made and recorded for each monitoring well prior to sampling.The depth to ground water at each monitoring well will be measured with an electronic water level meter. Additionally, water level measurements will be recorded at the upstream and downstream benchmarks established for the canal along the western side of the Site. The water level measurements will ultimately be used to establish the localized direction of ground water �... flow across the Site. Prior to sampling, each of the monitoring wells will be purged to facilitate collection of representative samples from the water-bearing formation. The monitoring wells will be purged using a peristaltic pump and low-flow techniques. Throughout the purging process, field parameters will be measured and recorded on ground water sampling logs. The measured field parameters will include pH, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen, oxidation/reduction potential,and turbidity. Ground water samples will be collected from each monitoring well once the field parameter readings have stabilized indicatnig that fresh formation water is entering the monitoring well. The ground water samples will be collected in laboratory supplied containers with the appropriate preservatives.Following collection,the ground water samples will be placed on ice and prepared to transport to the designated laboratory under chain-of-custody protocol. As noted in KHA's October 16, 2012 letter to the FDEP,the ground water across the site contains elevated concentration of tannins which impart elevated turbidity of the ground water samples. As such, both total and dissolved metals samples will be collected from the Site. The dissolved metals samples will be collected using a dedicated; 1.0-micor in-line filters pursuant to the FDEP's SOP DEP-SOP-001/01 FS 2225. At the Northeast Grove area ground water samples will be collected from monitoring wells NEG- MWAR, NEG-MW-1 Deep, NEG-MW-2, NEG-MW-3 and NEG-MW-4. The corresponding ground water samples will be analyzed for total dissolved solids and total and dissolved arsenic. The eleven monitoring wells at the Southwest Grove area: SWG-SHW-1, SWG-SHWMW- IDEEP, SWG-MW-1, SWG-MW-2, SWG-MW-3, SWG-MW-4, SWG-MW-5, SWG-MW-6, SWG-MW-7, SWG-MW-100,and SWG-MW-101, will be analyzed for total dissolved solids and total and dissolved arsenic and lead. In addition to the 17 ground water samples, QA/QC samples 40 a Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. �•- consisting of 2 blind duplicate samples and 2 equipment blanks will be collected pursuant to the FDEP's SOP. The ground water samples will be analyzed on a normal (7 to 10-day)turn-around time. Task 2—Ground Water Monitoring Report Upon receipt of the laboratory data, KHA will prepare and submit a Site .4ssessnient Status Report to the FDEP. The report will summarize the methodology and results of the additional ground water sampling.The Site Assessment Status Report will include the following: • A description of the methodologies employed for the additional sampling. • A discussion of the ground water quality data collected from the Site. • Tabular summaries of the ground water quality data. • Tabular summary of the depth to ground water measurements. • Scaled drawings depicting the location of the existing and proposed monitoring wells. • Scaled ground water contour maps. • Copies of the laboratory analytical data. The report will be signed and sealed by a Professional Geologist licensed in the State of Florida. The County will be provided with three hard copies and one electronic copy of the report. Additionally,one hard copy and one electronic copy of the report will be submitted to the FDEP. For the Additional Services set forth above in Tasks 1 and 2,Client shall pay Consultant the lump sum labor amount of$8500.00, exclusive of sampling expenses. Expenses are anticipated to be approximately$3000.00. 41 KknIg-HO171 afldksod8tes,Inc. February 22,2012 s 8,4 200 Mr.Roland DeB lois,AICP 445 24"Sheat Chief,Environmental Planning 32 aead,,Florida 32960 1801 27th Street Vero Beach,FL 32960-3388 Re: Professional Services Agreement Shadowbrook Estates,Inc. Site Dear Roland: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ("KHA" or "Consultant") is pleased to submit this letter agreement (the "Agreement") to Indian River County ("Client") for providing Professional Environmental Services. Project Understanding Indian River County has been engaged in the on-going assessment and remediation of the former Shadowbrook Estates, Inc. Site. On July 14, 2011, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(FDEP)commented on the April 2011 Site Assessment Report Addendum prepared by Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants, Inc. (GEC) According to the FDEP, additional assessment of the ground water quality is necessary at both the Northeast Grove and the Southwest Grove areas on the Site. Additionally,the FDEP has requested an evaluation of the surface water quality of the canal west of the Southwest Grove area. On February 13,2012,Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc.(KHA)and Indian River County met with the FDEP to discuss the additional assessment work necessary to satisfy the FDEP's July 14, 2011 comment letter. The Department provided the following comments regarding the Northeast and Southwest Grove areas: Northeast Grove • The extent of the soil impacts has been delineated; however,the proposed remedial action has not been undertaken. GEC proposed the excavation and removal of a minimum of 400 cubic yards of arsenic-contaminated soil. However, in based on the end use of the Site as conservation land, the FDEP suggested calculating alternative soil cleanup target levels for arsenic based on the proposed land use. ATTACHMENT 2 TEL 772 794 4100 FAX 772 794 4130 42 �-� Kilt>lt3y Fdruaq e 2 of 15 � atld ASSOCIatB3,ltlt., + Vertical delineation of arsenic in ground water is required at monitoring well NEG MW-1. A minimum of l0 to 15 feet of separation is required between NEG MW-i and the corresponding deep well. • Resample the existing (and proposed deep) monitoring wells at the Northeast Grove. Southwest Grove • Additional ground water delineation for arsenic is warranted north of SWG MW-5 and east of SWG MW-6. • Vertical delineation of arsenic in ground water required at monitoring well SWG SHW-I. • The flow direction of the canal immediately west of the grove needs to be determined. Once established, the FDEP requested that upstream, midstream and downstream surface water samples be collected from the canal. • In-situ permeability testing (slug tests) should be performed in the Southwest Grove to establish the localized hydraulic conductivity for the surficial aquifer. The FDEP requested that a work plan be prepared and submitted for the foregoing assessment activities. The FDEP approved a time extension until March 23, 2012 to submit the results of the additional site activities. However, based on the February meeting it was acknowledged that the additional site activities would not be completed by this date; thus, submittal of the Work Plan should occur on or before this date. Additionally, the Department recommended that the work plan include a schedule for the completion of the field activities and the submittal of the corresponding report. Scope of Services KHA has prepared the following scope of services based on the foregoing project understanding. The scope of services has been developed to address the FDEP's comments in their July 14;2011 letter and the additional assessment activities discussed during the February 13,2012 meeting. Task 1—Work Plan Preparation KHA will prepare and submit a work plan for the completion of the additional site assessment activities at the Northeast and Southwest Groves pursuant to the FDEP's request. The work plan will outline the specific assessment activities to 43 nFebruary 22,2012 a = \ V ''n c Page 3 of 15 be undertaken. Additionally, KHA will identify proposed monitoring well locations to be used in the vertical and horizontal delineation of arsenic in ground water. The work plan will prescribe the methodology to be used for the installation of the proposed monitoring wells. Additionally, the work plan will include methodologies for the sampling and analysis of ground water samples collected from both the proposed and existing monitoring wells on the Site. The FDEP requested that the localized hydraulic conductivity be established for the Southwest Grove. Therefore, KHA will propose that slug test be performed at three of the existing monitoring wells. KHA will include with the work plan a proposed schedule for the initiation of the field activities and the submittal of the corresponding documentation to the Department. The work plan will be signed and sealed by a professional geologist licensed in the State of Florida. Task 2—Additional Assessment Activities KHA will undertake the following additional assessment activities at the Northeast and Southwest Grove areas. The following additional assessment activities are subject to the FDEP's approval of the work plan prepared by KHA (Task 1). According to the reports prepared by GEC,there are five monitoring wells located on the Northeast Grove and eleven monitoring wells located on the Southwest Grove. Prior to the start of the assessment activities, KHA will locate and document the condition of the existing monitoring wells. KHA assumes that the existing 26 monitoring wells are intact and are capable of being sampled. If one or more monitoring wells have been damaged or cannot otherwise be sampled,KHA will confer with the FDEP regarding the need for their replacement. KHA will communicate this information to the County along with corresponding change in the drilling costs that are outlined herein. Northeast Grove The additional assessment activities associated with the Northeast Grove includes the installation of one deep monitoring well followed by the collection of ground water samples from the new and existing monitoring wells. Monitoring Well Installation— KHA will retain a licensed water well contractor to install a deep, double cased, monitoring well in the vicinity of existing monitoring well NEG MW-1. The deep 44 February 22,2012 ❑�� �1t11�8y'y0in Page 4 of 15 r_ and Associates,Inc. monitoring well will be installed to a total depth of approximately 35 feet below land surface(bls). The monitoring well will be located in the vicinity of NEG MW-1. It will be constructed of a 4-inch diameter, schedule 40 PVC outer casing to a depth of approximately 25 feet bis and a 2-inch diameter inner casing to a depth of 25 feet bls. The monitoring well will be completed with 5 feet of well screen,a sand pack and bentonite seal. The monitoring well will be finished above grade. Both the 4- inch diameter outer casing and the 2-inch diameter inner casing will extend approximately 2 to 3 feet above the land surface. The monitoring well will be completed with a 2-foot by 2-foot concrete well pad. A locking pressure cap will be used to secure the monitoring well. The monitoring well will be developed following installation. Well development facilitates the removal of sediment that accumulates within the well casing and sand pack during installation and promotes hydraulic communication with the monitoring well and the water-bearing fonnation. Ground Water Sampling— `1'he five existing monitoring wells(NEG MW-1,NEG MW-2,NEG MW-3,NEG MW-4 and NEW W 1)and one proposed monitoring well will be sampled for total and dissolved arsenic. Each monitoring well will be purged prior to sampling. Throughout the purging process,pH,specific conductivity,temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation/reduction potential and turbidity will be measured and recorded. Samples will be collected once the field parameters have -net the FDEP's stabilization criteria. The monitoring wells will be sampled for total and dissolved arsenic. The ground water samples will be placed on ice following collection and delivered to the Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (AEL) under chain- of-custody protocol. AEL is accredited by the NELAC(National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference)Institute, it is assumed that the samples will be analyzed on a normal (7 to 10 day)turnaround time and the cost of sampling is based on this assumption. Southwest Grove The additional assessment activities associated with the South Grove includes the installation of one deep monitoring well in the vicinity of SWG ST-TW-I. Additionally, two new shallow monitoring wells will be installed to delineate the extent of arsenic in ground water north of SWG MW-5 and east of SWG MW-6. Slug test will be performed on up to three monitoring wells to estimate localized hydraulic conductivity of the surficial aquifer. Ground water samples will be collected from the eight existing monitoring wells and three proposed monitoring 45 February 22,2012 _nn K rdey-Hom Page 5 of 15 r►�7 aM ftsoclates,Inc. wells, which will be analyzed for total and dissolved arsenic and lead. Three surface water samples will be collected from the canal immediately west of the Site. Monitoring Well Installation— KHA will retain a licensed water well contractor to install a deep, double cased, monitoring well in the vicinity of existing monitoring well SWG SHW-1. The deep monitoring well will be installed to a total depth of approximately 35 feet below land surface(bls). The deep monitoring well will be installed in the vicinity of SWG SHW-1. It will be constructed of a 4-inch diameter, schedule 40 PVC outer casing to a depth of approximately 25 feet bis with a 2-inch diameter inner casing to a depth of approximately 35 feet b1s.The monitoring well will be finished above grade.Both the 4-inch diameter outer casing and the 2-inch diameter inner casing will extend approximately 2 to 3 feet above the land surface. The monitoring well will be completed with a 2-foot by 2-foot concrete well pad. A locking pressure cap will be used to secure the monitoring well. Additionally, two shallow monitoring wells will be installed in, the Southwest Grove that will be used to further delineate the extent of arsenic in the ground water. One monitoring well will be installed north of SWG MW-5 and the other will be installed east of SWG MW-6. The two shallow monitoring wells will be installed to a maximum depth of approximately 20 feet b1s. The monitoring wells will be constructed of 2-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC casing with 10 feet of 0.010-inch machine-slotted well screen. The well casing will extend approximately 2 to 3 above laud surface and the monitoring well completed with a concrete well pad. The three monitoring well will be developed following installation. Ground Water Sampling— The eight existing monitoring wells (SWG SHW-1, SWG MW-1 SWG MW-2, SWG MW-4, SWG MW-4, SWG MW-5, SWG MW-6, and SWG MW-7) and three proposed monitoring wells will be sampled for total and dissolved arsenic and lead. Each monitoring well will be purged prior to sampling. Throughout the purging process, pH, specific conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation/reduction potential and turbidity will be measured and recorded. Samples will be collected once the field parameters have met the FDEP's stabilization criteria. The monitoring wells will be sampled for total and dissolved arsenic. The ground water samples will be placed on ice following collection and delivered to the Advanced Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (AEL) under chain- 46 -� � py.�m February 22,2012 - i]t?d�So es,Inc Page 6 of 15 Of-custody protocol. AEL is accredited by the NELAC (National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference)institute. It is assumed that the samples will be analyzed on a normal(7 to 10 day)turnaround time and the cost of sampling is based on this assumption. Surface Water Sampling— Pursuant to the FDEP's request, KHA will collect three surface water samples from the canal immediately west of the Site. KHA assumes that Indian River County will be responsible for securing permission to access the canal right-of. way for the completion of the surface water sampling. Prior to sampling, KHA will attempt to determine the flow direction of the canal based on visual observations of the canal. KHA will attempt to collect a total of 3 surface water samples from the canal. Relative to the Site, one sample will be collected up-stream, a second will be collected mid-stream and the thud will be collected down-stream. The approximate location of the surface water samples will be surveyed using a hand- held GPS(global positioning system)unit. The surface water samples will be placed on ice and transported to AEL under chain-of-custody protocol. Pursuant to the FDEP's request the surface water samples will be analyzed for total arsenic and total lead. It is assumed that the samples will be analyzed on a normal (7 to 10 day) turnaround time and the cost of sampling is based on this assumption. During the surface water sampling, KHA will attempt to identify a reference point along the canal from which surface water elevation measurements can be made. KHA will attempt to identify a control structure or other permanent structure from which a benchmark elevation can be surveyed. The depth to water elevations will be used to evaluate the localized direction of ground water flow relative to the canal. Slug Testing— The FDEP has requested that the ground water flow velocity be estimated for the Southwest Grove area. Therefore, KHA will select three of the shallow monitoring wells to perform slug testing. Falling head and rising head slug tests will be performed at each monitoring well. A pressure transducer will be used to measure and record the changes in the water level(head)in the well in response to adding.or removing a solid slug of a known volume. Task 3—Survey. The northing and easting coordinates and top of casing elevations for the existing monitoring wells were reportedly surveyed by GEC. KHA assumes that the 47 February 22,2012 - "-Hom Page 7 of 15 and Associates,Inc. County will provide the corresponding survey data so that it can be updated to include the proposed monitoring wells. A Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the State of Florida will survey the northing and easting coordinates and top of casing elevations of each of the proposed monitoring wells. Additionally, the coordinates and elevation of the canal benchmark will be surveyed. The survey data will be combined with the existing site survey. The top of casing elevation data will be used to establish the localized direction of ground water flow at each grove area. Task 4—Site Assessment Report Addendum Following the completion of Tasks 1 through 3, KHA will prepare a Site Assessment Report Addendum (SARA) for the Site. The SARA will document the methodologies and results of the forgoing site assessment activities. Additionally, KHA will respond to the relevant comments in the FDEP's July 14, 2011 correspondence. In doing so,KHA will assume that the data previously collected by GEC is correct and accurate. However, KHA will not certify the data and interpretation prepared by other. ' KHA will calculate alternative soil cleanup target levels(SCTL)for the Northeast Grove area based on the site assessment data previously collected by GEC. The alternative SCTLs will be based on the assumption that the area will be used for conservation purposes thereby limiting human exposure. KHA will calculate the alternative SCTLs for arsenic based on various exposure scenarios that are amenable to Indian River County with the understanding that the property will ultimately be placed under a deed restriction limiting is use. The SARA will include the following: • A written summary of the methodologies employed for the additional sampling activities undertaken by KHA. • A narrative of the corresponding results of the additional assessment activities. • A written summary of the derivation of the alternative SCTL for arsenic in the Northeast Grove.This includes a summary of the exposure scenario assumptions and copies of the corresponding calculations. • A written interpretation of the ground water quality data. • Copies of the slug test data and hydraulic conductivity calculations, including the raw field data in electronic format. • Tabulated summaries of the ground water quality data. 1... 48 February 22,2012 K deyHom Page 8 of 15 and Assodates,Inc. • Copies of the well construction logs and corresponding soil boring logs. • Copies of the sample collection logs • Copies of the laboratory data sheets. The SARA Report will be signed and sealed by a Professional Geologist Licensed in the State of Florida. KHA will provide Indian River County with three hard copies and one electronic copy(portable document format) of the SAIRA Report. Additionally, one hard copy and one electronic copy of the report will be submitted to the FDEP on behalf of Indian River County. Additional Services The following services are not included in the scope of services, but can be provided as additional services if authorized by you. Compensation for additional services will be agreed to prior to their performance. • Collection of additional soil or ground water samples not previously discussed. • Responding to the FDEP's request for additional information. • Preparation of a Remedial Action Plan for the Site. • Meeting or conference calls with the FDEP These services can be provided to you under this contract on a time and materials basis. Information Provided By Client We shall be entitled to rely on the completeness and accuracy of all information provided by the Client or the Client's consultants or representatives. The Client will provide a copy of the boundary survey and monitoring well survey data from GEC. Schedule We will provide the Work Plan for submittal to FDEP on or before March 23, 2012. A schedule of activities will be prepared in the Work Plan submitted to 49 �►-� KI111�8j1'HORI February e 9 f 12 Page 9 of 15 and AS8oQ�3te8,Inc. FDEP. The remaining tasks will be subject to approval by FDEP on the Work Plan. Fee and Expenses KHA will perform the forgoing scope of services based on the following lump sum fees,exclusive of sampling expenses: Task 1 —Work Plan Preparation $2,500 Task 2-Additional Assessment Activities $11,700 Task 3—Survey $3,500 Task 4-SARA Report Preparation $12,500 Sampling expenses including well driller and laboratory are estimated to be 11,000. Direct expenses for All permitting, application, and similar project fees will be paid directly by the Client. Lump sum fees will be invoiced monthly based upon the overall percentage of services performed. Payment will be due within 25 days of your receipt of the invoice. 50 '°Wtry February 22,2012 CIM" 'Snd AS50i�8163��"�1 ,Inc, Page 10 of 15 r_] Closure In addition to the matters set forth herein,our Agreement shall include and be subject to,and only to,the attached Standard Provisions,which are incorporated by reference. As used in the Standard Provisions,"Consultant"shall refer to Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.,and"Client"shall refer to Indian River County. KHA, in an effort to expedite invoices and reduce paper waste,offers its clients the option to receive electronic invoices. These invoices come via email hi an Adobe PDF format.We can also provide a paper copy via regular mail if requested. Please select a billing method from the choices below: X Please email all invoices to rdeblois Q ircclov com Please email invoices to_ (-0). AND provide a hard copy to the address listed above to the attention of (or provide alternative address). Please ONLY provide a hard copy invoice to the address listed above to the attention of (or provide alternative address). If you concur in all the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the services, please have authorized persons execute both copies of this Agreement in the spaces provided below,retain one copy,and return the other to us. We will commence services only after we have received a fully-executed agreement.Fees and times stated in this Agreement are valid for sixty(60)days after the date of this letter. To ensure proper set up of your projects so that we can get started,please complete and return with the signed copy of this Agreement the attached Request for Information. Failure to supply this information could result in delay in starting work on your project. This section intentionally left blank- 51 - FebmAry 22,2012 aAssoc 6 KInd1t1�/'NOfn Page 11 of IS U S'Inc. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services to you. Please contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, KIMLEY-HORN AND SSOCIATES,INC. � v , By: Mike K-_ief - - — Lynn iefer Sr. Vice President Sr.Vice President AGREED TO THIS 5 OF _ 2012 Indian River County Naw A County at Joseph A. Baird, county Administrator (Print or Type Name and Title) jbaird@ircgov.com (Email Address) Witness (Print or Type Name) RM S E ROY ION#EE 054284arch 12,2015Official Seal: ry PuM undervK"Attachment—Request for In Attachment—Standard Provisions APPROVED AS TO FORM A BY N GA SUFry Willi !M K.DEBRAAL DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY 52 3 CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: January 16, 2013 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Jason Brown, Director, Office of Management and Budget FROM: Jerry Davis, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Bid Award for IRC Bid No. 2013016 Annual Bid for Street Sweeping Services BACKGROUND: The Road and Bridge Department has requested an annual bid for FY 2012/2013 for street sweeping of 190 lane miles. This annual bid is for the period February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014 with renewal options for two (2) additional one (1) year periods. The bid results are as follows: Bid Opening Date: December 18, 2012 at 2:00 pm Advertising Dates: November 26, 2012 DemandStar Broadcast to: One Hundred Eighty Nine (189) Vendors Specifications Requested by: Twenty One (2 1) Vendors Replies: Five (5) Vendors BID TABULATION: No >a,e �� 1�: _.,.� Clean Sweep &Vac,LLC Stuart,FL $30,260.00* International Sweeping, Inc. dba Facilities Pro Sweep West Palm Beach, FL $34,340.00 U.S. Sweeping, Inc. Aventura, FL $34,752.00 Star Cleaning USA, Inc. Pembroke Pines, FL $38,200.00** USA Services of Florida, Inc. Longwood, FL $39,900.00 * Clean Sweep&Vac—Total Corrected(Mathematical Errors) ** Star Cleaning USA,Inc.—Total Corrected(Mathematical Errors) ANALYSIS: The amount of funds for Street Sweeping Services used in 2011-2012 year was $15,230.25 (vendor completed only five out of six cycles). If the bid is renewed for next year, all cycles will be completed for the full bid amount of$30,260.00. 53 CONSENT AGENDA The estimated expenditure for the 2012-2013 year is $21,260.00, per break down as follows: First Cycle (February) 170 miles @ $26.00 $ 4,420.00 Three Cycles (April, June, and August) 510 miles @ $24.00 12,240.00 Anticipated new curb 15 miles @$24.00 360.00 Sweeping of uncurbed roads 10 miles @$24.00 240.00 Miscellaneous sweeping 40 hours @$100.00 4,000.00 TOTAL REQUESTED $21,260.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends awarding this bid as follows: ■ Award to Clean Sweep & Trac, LLC as the lowest and most responsive bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. ■ Authorize the Purchasing Division to issue blanket purchase orders for the period of February 1, 2013 through January 31, 2014 with the recommended bidder. ■ Authorize the Purchasing Manager to renew this bid for two (2) additional one (1) year periods subject to satisfactory performance, vendor acceptance, and the determination that renewal of this annual bid is in the best interest of Indian River County. FUNDING: Expenditures for FY 2011/12 totaled $15,230.25 (vendor only completed five out of six cycles). The projected expenditure for FY 2012/13 is $22,100.00. The new bid cost is a 38.5% increase as compared to the FY 2010 bid based on a per lane mile cost. Funding in the amount of $22,100.00 for the Annual Bid for Street Sweeping is budgeted and available as follows: Account Number Account Description Amount 11121441-033190 Other Professional Services $22,100.00 ATTACHMENTS: Department Recommendation Memo Bid Tabulation Bid Form APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River Co Appxpked Date Admin / /7 / By: Legal aird, County Administrator Budget Department !3 FOS ������ Risk Man a er 54 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , �1rFAN RIVER COUNTY Pr1':RcE[ASING DIVISION STREET MEMO -CRO BEACH,FLORIDA 32960 _ -1 t- 13 Al _ D7 UT DATE: January 16, 2013 TO: Jerry Davis, Purchasing Manager THRU: Chris Mora, Director Public Works Department FROM: Terry R. Cook, Superintendent Road &Bridge SUBJECT: I.R.C. Bid# 2013016 Annual Bid for Street Sweeping Services The staff recommends that the contract for Street Sweeping Services be awarded to Clean Sweep &Vac., of Stuart, Florida The amount of funds for Street Sweeping Services used in 2011-2012 year was $15,230.25 (Vendor only completed five cycles out of six). The estimated expenditure for the 2012-2013 year is $21,260.00,per break down as follows: First Cycle (February) 170 miles @ $26.00 $ 4,420.00 Three Cycles (April, June and August) 510 miles @ $24.00 12,240.00 Anticipated new curb 15 miles @ $24.00 360.00 Sweeping of uncurbed roads 10 miles @ 24.00 240.00 Miscellaneous sweeping 40 Hrs. @ $100.00 4,000.00 ------------- Total requested $21,260.00 E:\OFFICE\CONTRACTS\SWEEPING\SWEEPING\BID AWARD2012-2013 55 (0 Ln INDIAN RIVER COUNTY � V .._. 1'URCIiASING DIVISION V � 800 27th Street,Vero Beach,FI- +2960 (772)226-141 04 BID TABULATION Bid Opening Date lime t>� 0.t V "' December 18,2012 2:OOPM ; L6LZ a V Bid No. Department 3 O v t1 2013016 Road &Bride Bid Title c Z y rn L C Q C V (IJA G Annual Bid for Street Swee in Bid Form Y Y Y Y Y Addendum(1) Y Y N Y Y Disclosure Y Y Y Y Y Price Extension Y N Y Y Y Item No. Description Unit Price Extension Price Unit Price Extension Price Unit Price Extension Price Unit Price t:xtension Price Unit Price Extension Price I First cycle cost per curb/lane no on $ 26.00 $ 4,420.00 $ 32.00 $ 5,440.00 $ 30.00 $ 5,100.00 $ 42.00 $ 7.140.00 $ 36.90 $ 6.273.00 mile roles 2 Second and future cycles 40000 $ 24.00 $ 21,600.00 $ 28.50 $ 25,650.00 $ 30.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 31.90 $ 28.710.00 $ 26.90 $ 24,210.00 cost per curb/lane mile miles 3 The cost per uncurbed/lane l000 $ 24.00 $ 240.00 $ 25.00 $ 250.00 $ 30.00 $ 300.00 $ 25.00 $ 250.00 $ 26.90 $ 269.00 Inde codes The cost per hour for 4 additional work that may be 4000 $ 100.00 $400.00* $ 75.00 $ 3,000-00 $ 145.00 $ 5.800.00 $ 95.00 $ 3.800.00 $ 100.00 $ 4,000.00 requested for special events, hours parking lots,etc. Total of Items 1 -4 $ 30,260.00 1 $ 34,340.00 $43,627.00** $ 39,900.00 FS 34,752.00 *Clean Sweep-Item 4 corrected to$4,000.00(Mathematical Error by Bidder) **Star Cleaning-Bid Total corrected to$38,200.011(Mathematical Error by Bidder) wITNESS TO BID OPENING: Maeghan McLaughlin AND Jennifer Hyde Indian River County Purchasing Division V ER�cpG�\\ 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone (772) 226-1416 Fax (772) 770-5140 ��OR✓�/ Bid Form Annual Bid for Street Sweeping Services Bid #: 2013016 Bid Opening Date and Time: December 18, 2012 2:00 P.M. Bid Opening Location: Purchasing Division 180027 th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 In accordance with all terms,conditions,specifications,and requirements,the Bidder offers the following: Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1. First cycle cost per curb/lane mile 170 Miles $ oZ(o, 00 $ 14y 10 . 0() 2. Second and future cycles cost per curb/lane mile 900 Miles $ Q4q 00 $ 91 &W. d p 3. Cost per uncurbed/lane mile 10 Miles $,')Ll_ 6v $ ay,) . 6v 4. Additional work that may be requested for 40 Hours $ 106.M> $ t-(06 , d b special events, parking lots, etc. Total Bid Price (items 1-4) �- L Cd' ,_d' L t Total Bid Price in Words Project completion time after receipt of"Notice to Proceed"or PO: DAYS Will your company extend these prices to other governmental agencies Yes 14 No❑ within the State of Florida? Page 29 of 35 57 2013-Annual Street Sweeping •► The undersigned hereby certifies that they have read and understand the contents of this solicitation and agree to furnish at the prices shown any or all of the items above, subject to all instructions, conditions, specifications, and attachments hereto. Failure to have read all the provisions of this solicitation shall not be cause to alter any resulting contract or request additional compensation. Company Name: (?L6:Ak) Su� p S \JAC LL Q Company Address: 2W 1 S City, State ST 0 Z-s � i' L Zip Code 311 q(Y Telephone: Fax: 7-'(Q —DR ` ©Com -7 E-mail: L���;E (� �>� I�CEP A U/SC . CL �v� Business Tax Receipt Number: FEIN Number: a -2&ER(H S_ Authorized Signature: Date: 1-2- 1? — IQ Name: �AUt I N e Flu Title: ! 1 , v�CoL (Type/Printed) Page 30 of 35 58 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM "ft- TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E. CW_.' Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray, Jr. Coastal Engineer SUBJECT: Emergency Dune Stabilization Projects -Award of Contract Henry Fischer& Sons, Inc. DATE: January 15, 2013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On October 26, 2012, the eye of Hurricane Sandy passed approximately 200 miles east of Indian River County producing over 10-foot breaking waves along the coast and 20 to 30 feet waves offshore. As a result of the high surf, approximately 6-8 feet of dune retreat was experienced at a number of County maintained beach parks including; Wabasso Beach Park, Golden Sands Beach Park, Seagrape Trail Beach Park, and Tracking Station Beach Park. Seagrape Trail and Tracking Station Beach Park dunes have already been restored through separate emergency dune stabilization contracts and are not the subject of this agenda item. On January 11, 2013, staff solicited for two separate quotes, via e-mail to previously contracted sand miners, to restore eroded dunes at Wabasso Beach Park and Golden Sands Beach Park prior to the March 1, 2013 sea turtle nesting season. Summarized below are the 4 quotes received January 14, 2013 for each dune stabilization project. Emergency Dune Stabilization Project—Wabasso Beach Park Contractor Total Bid Henry Fischer& Sons, Inc. $40,562.50 Ranch Road Lake, LLC $42,187.50 Legacy One, Inc. $45,156.25 Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. $52,330.00 °�— FAPublic Works\JamesG\TS Sandy October 2012\Dune Stabilization Projects\Agenda Items\1-22-13 memo to bcc Emergency Dune Stabilization Project--Wabsso&Golden Sands.docx 59 Page 2 Consent Agenda Item for January 22, 2013 Emergency Dune Stabilization Projects January 15, 2013 IVMW Emergency Dune Stabilization Proiect—Golden Sands Beach Park Contractor Total Bid Henry Fischer &Sons, Inc. $57,881.25 Ranch Road Lake, LLC $59,062.50 Legacy One, Inc. $63,218.75 Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. $72,935.00 Staff has reviewed all bid proposals and has determined that the lowest, most qualified quotes were submitted by Henry Fischer & Sons, Inc.; $40,562.50 for the Wabasso Beach Park Project and $57,881.25 for the Golden Sands Beach Park Project. The total estimated sand quantity for the Wabasso Beach Park Project is 2,500 cubic yards or 3,125 tons. The total estimated sand quantity for the Golden Sands Project is 3,500 cubic yards or 4,375 tons. Beach access for construction will be through Wabasso and Golden Sand Beach Parks. The closure of the parks will be necessary for construction activities and will be closely coordinated with the contractor to minimize disruption to the public. FUNDING Funding for this expenditure will be from the Beach Restoration Fund, Other Contractual Services, Account# 12814472-033490. F:\Public Works\JamesG\TS Sandy October 2012\Dune Stabilization Projects\Agenda Items\1-22-13 memo to bcc Emergency Dune Stabilization Project--Wabsso&Golden Sands.docx 60 Page3 Consent Agenda Item for January 22,2013 Emergency Dune Stabilization Projects January 15, 2013 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve staff to issue two separate Work Orders to Henry Fischer & Sons, Inc. in the amounts of $40,562.50 for the Wabasso Beach Park Dune Stabilization Project, and $57,881.25 for the Golden Sand Beach Park Dune Stabilization Project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Henry Fischer& Sons, Inc. Quote - Wabasso Beach Park 2. Henry Fischer & Sons, Inc. Quote - Golden Sands Beach Park APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Indian River County —Apjaroved Date Administration >117I 3 FOR:January 22, 2013 Budget I 14 �3 14001. Legal �I�Y . i I t� Public Works 116113 Coastal Engr.Division SDG 111.5113 F:\Public Works\JamesG\TS Sandy October 2012\Dune Stabilization Projects\Agenda Items\1-22-13 memo to bcc Emergency Dune Stabilization Project--Wabsso&Golden Sands.docx 61 ATTACHMENT 1 • Site Development HENRY FISCHER & SONS, INC. • Road & Parking Lot Construction • P.OStorm Drainage • Land Clearing . Box 780068 • Sebastian, Florida 32978-0068 • Fill Hauling & Compaction (772) 589-3159 • Fax: (772) 589-7731 • hfischer@wedigflorida.com • Heavy Equipment Rentals Indian River County Purchasing Division 1800 27th St. Vero Beach, 32960 BID PROPOSAL Date Job# Phone: 772-226-1416 Fax 772-770-5140 Customer E-mail: 1/14/2013 13-014-02FS Customer Contact James Gray Description Qty Cost Unit Total Wabasso Beach Park Emergency Sand Projects 1808 Wabasso Beach Road Vero Beach,FL 32960 Beach Cornpatihle Sand 3,125 12.98 Tons 40,562.50 I JAN 1 6 2013 t _ I PUBIC WORKS DEPT.' I. Price excl odes:permits,testing,sod.seeding.surveys,and engtneenng un ess of erwtse stated. 2. Henry Fischer&Sons.Inc.is not responsible for any underground lines and cables,including Subtotal $40,562.50 privately i,)wned lines or sprinkler systems.Two business days notice must be given so utilities can be notified per FL.Statute,Chapter 5>6. FS. 3. This proposal is valid for 30 days. Henry Fischer&Sons reserve the right to update prices after Sales Tax (7.0%) $0.00 180 days regardless of acceptance of this proposal. 4. Payment to be made as follows: Net 15 days interest at the rate of 1.51.7,per month shall be charged f(-)r any amount not paid within 30 days. If an Agent or.attorney is employed by Henry Total $40,562.50 Fischer& Sons.Inc.for collection of any delinquent or disputed payment.customer agrees to pay in addition to any service charge,all fees for the services of such Agent or Attorney(including but not limitecd to all fees and cost incident to any appeals.) 5. This proposal shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida without regard to principles or conflict ot-laws.Venue of all proceedings shall be in Indian Rix er County,FL and customer awes whatever rights it may hake in section of venue and hereby consent to jurisdiction. "O..� We look forward to working with you. the above[rices,specifications and conditions are hereby accepted as indicated by my signature bwlow and any options I have initialed: Authorized Signature or Henry Fi cher&Sons,Inc.: Signature: Date: Henry A. Scher.President 62 Printed Name: ATTACHMENT 2 • Site Development HENRY FISCHER & SONS, INC. • Road & Parking Lot Construction • Storm Drainage • Land Clearing P.O. Box 780068 • Sebastian, Florida 32978-0068 • Fill Hauling & Compaction (772) 589-3159 • Fax: (772) 589-7731 • hfischer@wedigflorida.com • Heavy Equipment Rentals Indian River County Purchasing Division 1800 27th St. BID PROPOSAL Vero Beach, 32960 Date Job# Phone: 772-226-1416 Fax 772-770-5140 Customer E-mail: 1/14/2013 13-016-01FS Customer Contact James Gray Description Qty Cost Unit Total Golden Sands Beach Park Emergency Sand Projects 10350 Highway AlA Vero Beach,FL 32960 Beach Compatible Sand Placed 4,375 13.23 Tons 57,881.25 I Q � C� � ad � JAN t 2013 D� N WA, PUBLIC WO RKS DEPT.' 1. Price excludes: permits,testing,sod,seeding.surveys,and engineering unless otherwise lated. 2. Henry Fischer&Sons,Inc.is not responsible for any underground lines and cables,including Subtotal $57,881.25 privately owned lines or sprinkler systems.Two business days notice must be given so utilities can be notified per FL.Statute,Chapter 556.FS. 3. This proposal is valid for 30 days. Henry Fischer&Sons reserve the right to update prices after Sales Tax (7.0%) $0.00 180 days regardless of acceptance of this proposal. 4. Payment to be made as follows: Net 15 days interest at the rate of 1.5%per month shall be charged for any amount not paid within 30 days. If an Agent or AttorneN'is employed by Henry Total $57,881.25 Fischer&Sons,Inc.for collection of any delinquent or disputed payment,customer agrees to pay in addition to any service charge.all fees for the services of such Agent or Attorney(including but not limited to all fees and cost incident to any appeals.) 3. This proposal shall he governed by the laws of the State of Florida�tiithout regard to principles or conflict of laws.Venue of all proceedings shall be in Indian Ri%er Count\.FL and customer gives whatever rights it may ha%e in section of venue and hereby consent tojurisdiction. We look forward to working with you. the above prices,specifications and conditions are hereby accepted as indicated by my signature below and any options I have initialed: .Authorized Signature for Henry Fischer&Sons,Inc.: Signature: Date: Henry A. Fischer.President /� Printed Name: 6 3 q CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET `*AW PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: January 15, 2013 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Jason Brown,Director, Office of Management and Budge Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services FROM: Jerry Davis, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Bid Award for IRC Bid No. 2013013 West Regional WWTP Anaerobic Tanks Odor Control System Design and Improvements BACKGROUND: The Department of Utility Services has requested the solicitation of bids for the West Regional WWTP Anaerobic Tanks Odor Control System Design and Improvements. BID RESULTS: Bid Opening Date: December 11, 2012 Advertising Date: November 8, 2012 DemandStar Broadcast to: 903 Vendors Specifications Requested by: 60 Vendors Replies: Seven Vendors BID TABULATION: 4. ' v r R.J. Sullivan Corp. Pompano Beach, FL $1,015,000.00 TLC Diversified, Inc. West Palm Beach, FL $1,017,000.00 Hinterland Group, Inc. West Palm Beach, FL $1,034,959.52 CenState Contractors, Inc. Winter Haven, FL $1,063,000.00 Close Construction, LLC Okeechobee, FL $1,090,996.00 Jones Mechanical Corp. Rockledge, FL $1,143,758.00 Wharton-Smith, Inc. Sanford, FL $1,272,000.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $1,100,000.00 FAPurchasing{Bids{2012-2013 FY(2013000)\2013013 West Regional WWTP Odor ControlWgenda-2013013.doc 64 CONSENT AGENDA The County's Consulting engineer, Atkins North America, Inc. (Atkins) has reviewed the bids and has recommended that the bid be awarded to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, R. J. Sullivan Corp., Pompano Beach, FL for a Total Bid Price of$1,015,000.00. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funding for the West Regional WWTP Anaerobic Tanks Odor Control in the amount of $1,015,000.00 is budgeted and available as follows: Account Number Account Description Amount 471-169000-11504 West Regional WWTF Odor Improvements $1,015,000.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends awarding this bid to R.J. Sullivan Corp., as the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the invitation to bid. Staff further requests that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached sample agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute said agreement after receipt and approval of the required certificate of insurance and after the County Attorney has approved the agreement as to form and legal sufficiency. ATTACHMENTS: Recommendation of Award Bid Tabulation Bid Sample Agreement APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Indian River Co A ed Elto -/ Admin i T/ BY: �1�, o nC�1 Legal ttO osep A. Baird, County Administrator Budget Department FO 21 Ae13 Risk Mana er 'W.. FAPurchasing\Bids\2012-2013 FY(2013000)\2013013 West Regional WWTP Odor Control\Agenda-2013013.doc 65 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INDIAN RIVER COUNWRCHASING DIVISION ET z ? DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY Skid FLORIDA 32960 �L�iRI���• INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: January 9, 2013 01-1 4-1 3 A 1 1 :2 2 R C V D TO: Jerry Davis, Manager, Purchasing Division FROM: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Service PREPARED BY: Michael C. Hotchkiss, P.E., Capital Projects Ma ager SUBJECT: Bid Award Recommendation for Odor Control Improvements at the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility IRC Bid No.: 2013013 UCP No.: 4067 WIP No.: 471-169000-11504 On Thursday, December 11, 2012, seven (7) Bids were received and opened at 2:00 PM for the above referenced project,as follows: Bidder(s) City/State Total Bid Price 1. R J.Sullivan Corp. Pompano Beach,FL $1,015,000.00 2. TLC Diversified,Inc. West Palm Beach,FL $1,017,000.00 3. Hinterland Group,Inc. West Pal n Beach,FL 51,034,959.52 4. CenState Contractors,Inc. Winter Haven,FL S 1,063,000.00 5. Close Construction,LLC Okeechobee,FL 51,090,996.00 6. Jones Mechanical Corp. Rockledge,FL 51,143,758.00 7. Wharton Smith,Inc. Sanford,FL 51,272,000.00 The County's Consulting Engineer, Atkins North America, Inc. (Atkins) has reviewed the bids and has recommended that the bid be awarded to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, R. J. Sullivan Corp., Pompano Beach, FL for a Total Bid Price in the amount of$1,015,000.00. Please find attached the recommendation of Award letter from Atkins as a reference. The engineer's estimate was $1,100,000.00. Therefore, there are sufficient funds in the capital projects budget to fund the $1,015,000.00 project. The Department of Utility Services acknowledges and accepts Atkins' recommendation to award the bid in the amount of$1,015,000.00 to R. J. Sullivan Corp. A sample contract has been prepared and is attached to this memo for pre-approval (in form) by the BCC in awarding the project. If you have any questions, please call Michael Hotchkiss at Ext. 1821. Cc: Vincent Burke,P.E.,Director,Utilities vburke@ircgov.com Cindy Corrente,Finance Manager,Utilities ccorrente@ircgov.com Terry Southard,Manager of Operations,Utilities tsouthard@ircgov.com ."Aw Rich Meckes,Wastewater Plant Superintendent,Utilities rmeckes@ircgov.com Raj Singh,P.E.,Atkins Raj.singhl@atkinsglobal.com Page 1 66 Atkins North America,Inc. '",.. �INS 482 South Keller Road ATOrlando, Florida 32810-6101 Telephone: +1.407.647.7275 www.atkinsgiobal-com/northamerica January 2, 2012 Mike Hotchkiss Capital Projects Manager Indian River County 1801 27th Street. Vero Beach, Fl 32960 Re: West Regional WWTP Anaerobic Tanks Odor Control System Design Bid Award Recommendation Dear Mike: Although, the initial design and construction of the West Regional Wastewater Plant included Odor Control equipment for areas of the plant that normally are expected to generate odors, due to complains from adjoining neighbors regarding odors from the plant, an odor evaluation at the plant was conducted which recommended additional odor control measures. The current project that includes design of cover system for the anaerobic tanks with a dedicated odor control system will incorporate the odor evaluation recommendations to address public concerns. The project was competitively bid and the County received several responsive bids. RJ Sullivan Corp. is the apparent low bidder. As we briefly discussed earlier on the phone, we have contacted several of the RJ Sullivan Corp.'s references that were provided with their bid package. We selected several projects from their reference list that represented similar or higher level of complexity as anaerobic tanks odor control project. Based on our discussions with several references, RJ Sullivan Corp. appears to be competent to accomplish the work on hand and recommend the contract be awarded to them provided they have met other legal and contractual requirement set forth by the County. If you have any questions regarding this, please give me a call at 407-647-7275 ext. 4337 or e-mail at raj.sinch 1 k-tatkinsalobal.com. Sincerely, Raj Singh, P.E. I-U. Sr. Project Engineer 67 00 Cfl INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Witness:Jennifer Hyde PURCHASING DIVISION Witness: Maeghan McLaughlin 1800 27th Street,Vero Beach,FL 32960 BID TABULATION � V V Bid Opening Date: Time: V CC ~ S ~ December 11, 2012 2:OOPM Bid No. Department � E a 2013013 Utilities Bid Title V V PLO West Regional WWTP Anaerobic Tanks >~ ,� c u ,,,� U Odor Control Systemcc V U O Mandatory Pre-Bid Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Bid Form (Revised) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Addendum #1 and#2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Trench Safety Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Bid Bond Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Schedule of Subcontractors Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Schedule of Suppliers Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Disclosure Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Information Required of Bidders Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ?, ;f ; .t $$ 1,1`43,758:00. „$�_:1,015;O0Q.00,, _$:u1;017,000.0Q $42,OOO.OU,,. COMMENTS: The CONTRACTOR shall be substantially completed with the work Two Hundred and Forty (240)calendar days after issuance of the Notice to Proceed,in accordance with Paragraph 2.03 of the General Conditions,and be completed and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 14.07 of the General Conditions within Two Hundred and Seventy(270)calendar days after the issuance of the Notice to Proceed. i 6. The following documents are attached to and made a part of this Bid: 1 (a) Certificate of Compliance with the Florida Trench Safety Act(Section 003 10) (b) Disclosure of Relationships(Section 00452) (c) Schedule of Subcontractors(Section 0043 1) (d) General Information Required for Bidders(Section 00456) 7. The terms used in this Bid, which are defined in the General Conditions of the Construction Contract included as part of the Contract Documents, have the meanings assigned to them in the General Conditions. Contractor acknowledges the insurance requirements of Section 00700 as amended by Section 00800 and any other addendums and agrees to provide said insurance upon award of contract. BIDDER INFORMATION: SUBMITTED ON: December 11, 2012 (DATE) SUBMITTED BY: R.J. Sullivan Corp. (NAME OF BIDDER) �. 2001 N.W. 22nd Street (STREET ADDRESS) Pompano Beach, FL 33069 (CITY,STATE,zip) (954) 975-0388 (PHONE#) I (954) 975-3333 i (FAX#) csullivan@rjsullivancorp .co7_MAIL) I 59-163-4796 (FEDERAL ID#) CGC1507756 (FLORIDA LICENSE#) Casey R. Sullivan SIGNED BY: (PRINTED NAME) President (TITLE) / (SIGNATURE) s i f 00300-3 69 !3:26 #6232 P.002 '003 SCHEDULE OF BID ITEAls All bid items shall include arts for furnishing to the OWNER all materials,equipment, and supplies and for all costs incurred in compledn;the work-including installation of all materials,equipment and supplies furnished, complete in place and ready for continued service. all other labor, taxes, insurance, miscellaneous cost,overhead and profit B1D West Regional W-W TP Anaerobic Tanks Odor Control System Design Ibis Contract is a LUMP SUM CONTRACT, which consists o< sum total of individual bid Items described below and BIDDER is to include all costs BIDDER may anticipate dating the length of this project and the contract. Each BIDDER shall include all extras the BIDDFR may determine necessary to provide the quantity and quality of Work required by the Contract Documents- Fill in the following bid breakdown which will he used to dctennine bid coavt -'teness and understanding, and then fill in the Total Lump Sum Bid Price on the line provided_The total bid price must be equal to the sum of the values in the bid breakdown- The verified suttl of the individual values in the bid breakdown takes precedence over any discrepancy between the Total Lump Sum Bid Price written and the corrected total lump sum bid price. The base bid schedule shall include the following items including the allowance listed below. Each individual bid item shah be paid based on completeness as defined in section 01025-Measurement and Payment Item Namber Item IMscJption Total I Mobilization $ C CCL' . 2 Anaerobic Tanke Flat Aluminum Cover $.. G QC'• — 3 Anocrobic Tanks Odor Control System $ JL4 %, Coo 4 Odor Control q Duct Work $ C 5 Crit%uiptnent BQM § ?-: — I ,t U F�xptostoa proof motors and accessone. few existing t $ d goo .0a Aluminum Canopy for exist Sludg,Area Odor ontroI 7 Equipmeat $ (o COO. 00 Two (_) Confined space entry onitoring Units Per 8 section 15050. $ o0o. O 9 tour. (4) 5 Cubic aid Moll-off Dumpsters and floor. 10 -Landscying••Buffer and irrigations Stcm $ )f p it New ARVs vent Piping and Pump quick connect $ rek=Uon and other mtscellaneoas items l�,000. O 12 Aluminum stop plales for Filter Per Drawing M-7 $ 13 Allowance $ Awn GRAND TOTAL BASE BID; $ ``C s I cj CL C '— �i c (In Words) (BIDDERS NAME) 00300-4 ADDENDUM NO. 1 A-8 70 SECTION 00530— EJCDC STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ON THE BASIS OF A STIPULATED PRICE West Regional WWTP Anaerobic Tanks Odor Control System Design THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement" or"Contract"), dated the day of in the year 2013 by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter called OWNER) and R. J. Sullivan Corp. (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR). OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 WORK CONTRACTOR as an independent contractor and not as an employee shall furnish and complete all of the necessary labor, material, and equipment to perform the work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents (as that term is defined in Article 8 hrein) and per FDEP, FDOT, County Utilities Department and County Engineering Department standards. The work is generally described as follows: The Project includes Flat Aluminum Covers for two Anaerobic Tanks, Odor Control System, Building around the existing Grit Handling Equipment, Aluminum Canopy over existing sludge odor control equipment, Yard Piping Electrical/Controls, Instrumentation/SCADA, Landscaping Buffer and irrigation. All ancillary work associated with these systems are to be included ARTICLE 2 ENGINEER The project has been designed by Atkins, hereinafter called ENGINEER, and who is to act as OWNER'S representative, assume all duties and responsibilities and have the rights and authority assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract Documents in connection with completion of the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 3 CONTRACT TIME 3.1 The CONTRACTOR shall be substantially completed with the following timeframe The CONTRACTOR shall be substantially completed with the remaining work Two Hundred and Forty (240) calendar days after issuance of the Notice to Proceed, in accordance with Paragraph 2.03 of the General Conditions, and be completed and ready for final payment in accordance with Paragraph 14.07 of the General Conditions within Thirty (30) calendar days after the issuance of the Notice to Proceed. 3.2 Liquidated Damages. OWNER and CONTRACTOR recognize that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that OWNER will suffer financial loss if the work is not completed within the times specified in Paragraphs 3.1 and 3.2 above, plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with Article 12 of the General Conditions. They also recognize the delays, expense and difficulties involved in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by OWNER if the work is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, OWNER and CONTRACTOR agree that as liquidated damages for delay 00530-1 71 (but not as a penalty) CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER four-hundred and fifty dollars ($450.00) for each day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 3.1 for Substantial Completion, if CONTRACTOR shall neglect, refuse or fail to complete the remaining work within the Contract Time or any proper extension thereof granted by OWNER, CONTRACTOR shall pay OWNER four-hundred and fifty dollars ($450.00) for each day that expires after the time specified in Paragraph 3.2 for completion and readiness for final payment. 3.2.1 The CONTRACTOR and OWNER agree that OWNER is authorized to deduct all or any portion of the above-stated liquidated damages due to the Owner from payments due to the Contractor; or, in the alternative, all or any portion of the above-stated liquidated damages may be collected from the Contractor or its Surety or Sureties. These provisions for liquidated damages shall not prevent the OWNER, in case of the CONTRACTOR's default, from terminating the Contractor's right to proceed as provided in this AGREEMENT. 3.2.2 In addition to the above-stated liquidated damages, the CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for reimbursing OWNER to third party consultants in administering the Project beyond the Substantial Completion date specified in this Agreement, or beyond an approved extension of time granted to CONTRACTOR, whichever date is later. ARTICLE 4 CONTRACT PRICE ,,. 4.1 OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR for completion of the work in accordance with the Contract Documents in current funds in the amount of$1.015,000.00 ARTICLE 5 PAYMENT PROCEDURES CONTRACTOR shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with Article 14 of the General Conditions. Applications for Payment will be processed by ENGINEER as provided in the General Conditions and the Contract Documents. 5.1 Progress Payments. The OWNER shall make progress payments to the CONTRACTOR on the basis of the approved partial payment request as recommended by ENGINEER in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Florida Statutes section 218.70 ET. seq. The OWNER shall retain ten percent (10%) of the payment amounts due to the CONTRACTOR until fifty percent (50%) completion of the work. After fifty percent (50%) completion of the work is attained as certified to OWNER by ENGINEER in writing, OWNER shall retain five percent (5%) of the payment amount due to CONTRACTOR until final completion and acceptance of all work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under the Contract Documents. Pursuant to Florida Statutes section 218.735(8) (b), fifty percent (50%) completion means the point at which the County as OWNER has expended fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of the construction services work purchased under the Contract Documents, together with all costs associated with existing change orders and other additions or modifications to the construction services work provided under the Contract Documents. 00530-2 72 5.2 Pay Requests. Each request for a progress payment shall be submitted on the application for payment form supplied by OWNER and the application for payment shall contain the CONTRACTOR's certification. All progress payments will be on the basis of progress of the work measured by the schedule of values established, or in the case of unit price work based on the number of units completed. After fifty percent (50%) completion, and pursuant to Florida Statutes section 218.735(8)(d), the CONTRACTOR may submit a pay request to the County as OWNER for up to one half (1/2) of the retainage held by the County as OWNER, and the County as OWNER shall promptly make payment to the CONTRACTOR unless such amounts are the subject of a good faith dispute; the subject of a claim pursuant to Florida Statutes section 255.05(2005); or otherwise the subject of a claim or demand by the County as OWNER or the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR acknowledges that where such retainage is attributable to the labor, services, or materials supplied by one or more subcontractors or suppliers, the Contractor shall timely remit payment of such retainage to those subcontractors and suppliers. Pursuant to Florida Statutes section 218.735(8) (c) (2005), CONTRACTOR further acknowledges and agrees that: 1) the County as OWNER shall receive immediate written notice of all decisions made by CONTRACTOR to withhold retainage on any subcontractor at greater than five percent (5%) after fifty percent (50%) completion; and 2) CONTRACTOR will not seek release from the County as OWNER of the withheld retainage until the final pay request. 5.3 Paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 do not apply to construction services work purchased by the County as OWNER which are paid for, in whole or in part, with federal funds and are subject to federal grantor laws and regulations or requirements that are contrary to any provision of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act. In such event, payment and retainage provisions shall be governed by the applicable grant requirements and guidelines. 5.4 ACCEPTANCE AND FINAL PAYMENT: Upon receipt of written notice that the work is ready for final inspection and acceptance, the ENGINEER will promptly make such inspection and when the ENGINEER finds the work acceptable under the terms of the Contract and the Contract fully performed, the ENGINEER will promptly issue a final completion certificate stating that the work provided for in this Contract has been completed, and acceptance by the OWNER under the terms and the conditions thereof is recommended and the entire balance found to be due the CONTRACTOR, will be paid to the CONTRACTOR by the OWNER following County Commission approval of the final Contract payment. 5.5 Acceptance of Final Payment as Release. The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of final payment shall be and shall operate as a release to the OWNER from all claims and all liability to the CONTRACTOR other than claims in stated amounts as may be specifically excepted by the CONTRACTOR for all things done or furnished in connection with the work under this Contract and for every act and neglect of the OWNER and others relating to or arising out of the work. Any payment, however, final or otherwise, shall not release the CONTRACTOR or its sureties from any obligations under the Contract Documents or the Payment and Performance Bonds. ARTICLE 6 INTEREST Not Applicable. ARTICLE 7 CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS 00530-3 73 In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement, CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: 7.1 CONTRACTOR has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of the Contract Documents, work, site, locality, and all local conditions and laws and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress, performance or furnishing of the work. 7.2 CONTRACTOR has studied carefully all reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions and drawings of physical conditions which are identified in the Supplementary Conditions as provided in Paragraph 4.02 of the General Conditions, and accepts the determination set forth in Paragraph SC-4.02 of the Supplementary Conditions of the extent of the technical data contained in such reports and drawings upon which CONTRACTOR is entitled to rely. 7.3 CONTRACTOR has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for obtaining and carefully studying) all such examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, reports and studies (in addition to or to supplement those referred to in Paragraph 7.2 above) which pertain to the subsurface or physical conditions at or contiguous to the site or otherwise may affect the cost, progress, performance or furnishing of the work as CONTRACTOR considers necessary for the performance of furnishing of the work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Time and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, including specifically the provisions of Paragraph 4.02 of the General Conditions; and no additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, reports, studies or similar information or data are or will be required by CONTRACTOR for such purposes. 7.4 CONTRACTOR has reviewed and checked all information and data shown or indicated on the Contract Documents with respect to existing underground facilities at or contiguous to the site and assumes responsibility for the accurate location of said underground facilities. No additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, reports, studies or similar information or data in respect of said underground facilities are or will be required by CONTRACTOR in order to perform and furnish the work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Time and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, including specifically the provisions of Paragraph 4.04 of the General Conditions. 7.5 CONTRACTOR has correlated the results of all such observations, examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, reports and studies with the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. 7.6 CONTRACTOR has given ENGINEER written notice of all conflicts, errors or discrepancies that he has discovered in the Contract Documents and the written resolution thereof by ENGINEER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. ARTICLE 8 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between OWNER and CONTRACTOR concerning the work consist of the following: 8.1 This Agreement (Section 00530). •... 8.2 Public Construction Bond (Section 00610). 8.3 Notice of Award and Notice to Proceed (examples in Section 00800). 00530-4 74 8.4 General Conditions (Section 00700). 8.5 Supplementary Conditions (Section 00800). Documents/Specifications bearing the title "West Regional WWTP Anaerobic Tanks Odor Control System Design / Project No 4067/ Bid No. 2013013" 8.6 Addenda numbers 1 to 2 , inclusive. 8.7 CONTRACTOR'S Bid (Section 00300). 8.8 Specifications bearing the title "West Regional WWTP Anaerobic Tanks Odor Control System Design" 8.9 The following, which may be delivered or issued after the effective date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto: All written amendments and other documents amending, modifying, or supplementing the Contract Documents pursuant to Paragraphs 3.04 of the General Conditions. There are no Contract Documents other than those listed above in this Article 8. The Contract Documents may only be amended, modified or supplemented as provided in Paragraphs 3.04 of the General Conditions. ARTICLE 9 MISCELLANEOUS 9.1 Terms used in this Agreement which are defined in Article 1 of the General Conditions will have the meanings indicated in the General Conditions. 9.2 It is agreed that the CONTRACTOR shall not assign, transfer, convey, or otherwise dispose of the contract or its right, title, or interest in or to the same or any part thereof, or allow legal action to be brought in its name for the benefit of others, without previous consent of the OWNER and concurred to by the sureties. Any attempted assignment shall be void and may, at the option of the OWNER be deemed an event of default hereunder. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of the OWNER who may be a party hereto. 9.3 OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 9.4 The CONTRACTOR shall be properly licensed to practice its trade or trades which are involved in the completion of this Agreement and the work thereunder. 9.5 This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this agreement shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 9.6 The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold harmless the OWNER, and its officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongful misconduct of the CONTRACTOR and persons employed or utilized by the CONTRACTOR in the performance of the construction contract. Nothing herein shall effect the rights, privileges, and immunities of the OWNER as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. 00530-5 75 In any and all claims against the County or any of its agents or employees, by any employee of the contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, the indemnification obligation under the previous paragraph shall not be limited in any way as to the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the contractor or any subcontractor under Workers' Compensation Acts, disability benefit acts, or other employee benefit acts. 9.7 Pledge of Credit. The CONTRACTOR shall not pledge the OWNER'S credit or make it a guarantor of payment or surety for any Agreement, debt, obligation, judgment, lien or any form of indebtedness. The CONTRACTOR further warrants and represents that it has no obligation of indebtedness that would impair its ability to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. 9.8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, but all such counterparts, when duly executed, shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 9.9. Public Records. The OWNER and the CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (Public Records Law) in connection with this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER AND CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement the day and year first written above. OWNER Indian River County .,. Board of County Commissioners By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attest: Jeffery Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved By: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: County Attorney Address for giving notices 00530-6 76 ,., 1801 27" Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 CONTRACTOR R. J. Sullivan Corp. Casey R. Sullivan, President By: Attest: (CORPORATE SEAL) Address for giving notices: 2001 N.W. 22"d Street Pompano Beach, FL 33069 License No. CGC1507756 *END OF SECTION" 00530-7 77 PUBLIC HEARING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA LDR AMENDMENT �.. MEMORANDUM LEGISLATIVE TO: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator D,PTTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Q Robert M. Keating, P; Co ity Development Director J FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: January 8, 2013 SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendments to Land Development Regulations(LDRs)Chapters 911, 912, and 971 to Allow Outdoor Vehicle Storage Use in the CL (Limited Commercial) and CG (General Commercial) Zoning Districts and To Eliminate Limitations on Length of Recreational Vehicles Stored Outside on Residential Properties (PUBLIC HEARING #1) It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 22, 2013. BACKGROUND At its meeting of September 11, 2012, George Sigler appeared before the Board of County Commissioners (Board) and requested that the county change its land development regulations (LDRs) to allow paved or unpaved outdoor vehicle storage as an allowed use in the CL (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Currently, Mr. Sigler owns CL-zoned property located at the southwest corner of 27th Avenue SW and 6th Street SW, and wishes to develop an outdoor vehicle storage use on that site. During discussion at the September 1 lth meeting,the Board directed staff to evaluate allowing outdoor vehicle storage in the CL district under special conditions. Such special conditions could involve designating outdoor vehicle storage as a special exception use. In response to the Board's direction, staff met with Mr. Sigler, surveyed outdoor vehicle storage regulations of other local governments, analyzed Indian River County's existing regulations, and reported back to the Board. At its October 23,2012 meeting,the Board considered staff's analysis and directed staff to initiate amendments to the LDRs to allow outdoor vehicle storage in the CL and CG districts as a special exception use,subject to 6 criteria provided in staff's analysis. In addition, the Board directed staff to revisit the county's existing limitation on the length of recreational vehicles stored outside on individual residential properties. Staff then drafted an LDR amendment ordinance as directed by the Board, and initiated the formal amendment process. R\Community Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2013 BC00utdoorStoragereportl-22-13.doc 1 78 • Planning & Zoning Commission Action At its regular meeting of December 13,2012,the PZC voted 6-0 to recommend that the Board adopt the proposed LDR amendment ordinance. Because the proposed amendments include changes to the list of uses allowed in certain zoning districts, two BCC hearings are required. The Board has set the first public hearing for its regular meeting of January 22,2013. The second hearing is scheduled for a special meeting on February 5, 2013 that will begin at 5:01 pm. ANALYSIS Typically,commercial outdoor vehicle storage lots do not have enclosed buildings,but do consist of paved or stabilized"parking lots"for vehicles(cars,trucks,semi-trailers,buses,boats,recreational vehicles,and heavy equipment)within secure,fenced"compounds"that have perimeter landscaping. Under existing county land development regulations(LDRs),the outdoor vehicle storage lot use is not allowed in the CL district. 0 Existing County Regulations Currently,the county has a number of conventional commercial and industrial zoning districts that differ in intensity and purpose. Generally, less intense districts, such as the CL district,are located next to residential areas,while the more intense districts are located next to non-residential uses and districts (see attachment #1). The county's conventional commercial and industrial districts, listed from least intense to most intense, are as follows: PRO (Professional Office) OCR(Office, Commercial, Residential) MED (Medical) CN (Neighborhood Commercial) CL (Limited Commercial) CG (General Commercial CH (Heavy Commercial) IL (Light Industrial) IG (General Industrial) Under existing regulations, stand-alone paved or unpaved outdoor vehicle storage lots are allowed only within the CH,IL,and IG districts. Within those districts,several unpaved vehicle storage lots have been developed in the past 20 years. In each case, the unpaved vehicle storage lot was approved through the site plan process and subject to special buffer requirements specified in the county's parking regulations. According to the current code, vehicle storage lots, where allowed, must provide a Type"C"buffer with a 6' opaque feature along any major roadway and along a local roadway where property opposite the storage lot is commercially zoned but is not zoned CH,IL,or IG. No special buffer is required where a vehicle storage lot abuts a property zoned CH, IL, or IG. 140. Where the storage lot is located adjacent to a multi-family or single-family zoning district or use,a 6' opaque feature and Type B"(or higher)buffer is required. Depending upon planting density,a Type "C"buffer may be 15' or 20' wide, while a Type "B" buffer may be 25' or 30' wide. FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\OutdoorStoragereportl-22-13.doc 2 79 Currently, county regulations treat stand-alone outdoor vehicle lots as a warehousing and storage type use that is limited to the zoning districts that allow warehouse and storage facilities (CH, IL, and IG). The reason for that is that, like warehouse and storage uses, outdoor storage lots can involve heavy equipment storage and semi-trailer traffic. Unlike warehouse and storage uses,mini- storage (aka self-service storage) facilities are generally accessed by personal vehicles. Consequently, mini-storage businesses are allowed in the CL (special exception) and CG (administrative permit) districts as specially-regulated uses where size and scale are limited and Type `B" buffers are required. In the CG district, mini-storage sites are allowed to include accessory outdoor vehicle storage, if buffered. In the CL district,however,all forms of outdoor vehicle storage,even as an accessory use, are prohibited under current regulations (see attachment #2). That prohibition is based on the county's experience with vehicle storage yards in the CH, IL, and IG districts. Those yards often provide storage for heavy equipment and have the appearance of a construction yard. Consequently, the existing prohibition of vehicle storage yards(lots)in the CL district is based on the premise that typical outdoor storage lots which include storage of heavy construction vehicles and semi-trailers are not compatible with the aesthetic character of residential neighborhoods,especially single-family areas. Thus, the existing prohibition is intended to protect single-family residential areas from a potentially incompatible use. Currently, county regulations provide general protections for residential areas by requiring a Type "B" buffer with a 6' opaque feature between a single-family use/zoning district and a CL or CG ... development of any kind. Between a multi-family use/zoning district and a CL or CG development, a Type "C" buffer with 6' opaque feature is required. Therefore, significant buffers are required between all forms of CL and CG development and adjacent residential areas (see attachment#3). • Regulations of Other Local Governments To determine how other cities and counties regulate typical outdoor vehicle storage lots, staff surveyed various local governments(see attachment#4). Of all responding jurisdictions surveyed, none allow stand alone or accessory outdoor vehicle storage in light or limited commercial zoning districts, while all jurisdictions allow outdoor vehicle storage as a stand-alone or accessory use in industrial and general commercial/business districts. In addition, survey results show that most jurisdictions have specific buffer requirements for outdoor vehicle storage. In a few jurisdictions, special criteria,including a prohibition on vehicle sales and repair,apply to outdoor vehicle storage. In summary,Indian River County's existing outdoor vehicle storage lot regulations that prohibit that use in the CL district are consistent with the regulations of the other jurisdictions surveyed. None of the jurisdictions surveyed, however, had regulations for a "restricted" type of outdoor vehicle storage lot,such as a lot where storage of heavy construction vehicles and semi-trailers is prohibited. • Board Determination At its October 23rd meeting,the Board reviewed staff's analysis along with a list of potential criteria for stand-alone vehicle storage lots in the CL and CG districts. That list included 6 criteria for NOW special buffering and light shielding requirements,together with prohibitions on the storage of heavy equipment and semi-trailers, as well as a prohibition on activities such as vehicle sales and repairs (see attachment#4). After considering staff's analysis,the Board determined that, when carefully FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\OutdoorStoragereportl-22-13.doc 3 80 regulated through the special exception approval process, an outdoor vehicle storage lot that meets the 6 criteria would be an appropriate use in the CL and CG districts. • Proposed Ordinance The proposed ordinance allows stand alone outdoor vehicle storage lots (paved or unpaved) as a special exception use in the CL (Limited Commercial) and CG (General Commercial) zoning districts. The ordinance also establishes specific land use criteria for vehicle storage lots, summarized as follows: 1. Refers to (requires) an existing section of the parking ordinance that requires unpaved storage lot surfaces to be stabilized as approved by the public works director. 2. Sets buffer and opaque feature requirements: a Type B buffer where a storage lot is adjacent to residential property (single-family or multi-family) and a Type C buffer in other circumstances. In addition, a 6' opaque feature is required as part of each buffer, with vines and fencing specified as an acceptable opaque feature option. 3. Refers to (requires) an existing section of the Other Corridors regulations that requires outdoor lights to be shielded from adjacent properties and roadways. 4. Prohibits storage of semi-trailers and heavy construction-related vehicles and equipment. •.... 5. Prohibits storage of construction materials and merchandise. 6. Prohibits vehicle sales, rentals, repairs, and similar activities. Also,the proposed ordinance modifies self-storage(mini-storage)regulations to allow an accessory outdoor vehicle storage lot as part of a self-storage facility located in the CL district. Any such outdoor vehicle storage lot that is accessory to a self-storage facility will be subject to the 6 criteria (see above) for stand-alone facilities. As structured, the ordinance will apply the same criteria to stand alone and accessory outdoor vehicle storage lots located in the CL and CG districts. Currently, the LDRs define a recreational vehicle as having a size (vehicle length multiplied by width)not exceeding 400 sq.ft. Existing LDRs also limit the length of a recreational vehicle stored outside on a residential property to 32'. That 32' limitation on length is an old standard that is exceeded by many current and popular recreational vehicle models. As directed by the Board at its October 23rd meeting,the proposed ordinance accommodates current recreational vehicle models by eliminating a maximum vehicle length standard and simply applying the 400 sq. ft. standard for maximum vehicle size. Economic Impacts The proposed amendments, if adopted,will have no impact on the provision of housing. Therefore, the amendments will have no adverse impact on the provision of affordable housing. In addition,the amendments will not have the effect of increasing development costs. FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\OutdoorStoragereportI-22-13.doc 4 81 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners consider the proposed LDR amendments,direct staff to make any necessary revisions to the proposed ordinance,and announce its intention to adopt the final ordinance at its special meeting of February 5,2013 scheduled at 5:01 pm. ATTACHMENTS 1. Map of Residential, CL, CG, IL, and IG District Locations 2. Existing Regulations for Mini-Storage (Self-service storage) &Accessory Use 3. Buffer& Opaque Feature Standards 4. Chart of Local Government Regulations on Outdoor Vehicle Storage 5. Potential Criteria for Outdoor Vehicle Storage in the CL and CG Districts 6. Parking Ordinance Section 954.08(6) & Other Corridor Section 911.22(7)(e)4a 7. December 13, 2012 Planning&Zoning Commission Unapproved Minutes 8. Proposed Ordinance APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River Co, Approved Date Admin. J/-7// FOR: (��3 Legal - -+� BY: Budget Dept. Risk Mgr. FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\OutdoorStoragereportl-22-13.doc 5 82 N A\ AREA LOCATIONS Legend CL CH, IL, IG 0 Single-Family 1 .t . a 85TH ST 771H ST —65TH ST=- ':...... S� SWMW y —49TH ST =:: 37TH ST— .........._ a m - 60 16TH ST— > .............. >... Z 8TH ST.. a :::.t7...............N :: 1ST.ST.S W ............. 9TH ST SW 17TH STSW 25TH ST-SW ` ATAC Source: IRC Community Development Department October 12. N NORTH COUNTY = = AREA LOCATIONS =� Legend oM CL CH, IL, IG Single-Family :::�:: ............ 1 0 d A 70 �Q._............... .................... .... ....................................... 85TH ST �Q q...:................ _.77TH ST .. --73RD ST-- a a— Y � F" ado 68TH ST a ........ ................ —65TH ST Source: IRC Community Development Department October 12,2012 84 ILI �.����►+� ���".ice.-�� ,l Oat ------------- 1 �♦iii �t 1 r w � � Existing Regulations for Mini-storage (Self-service storage) & Accessory Uses [971.12] ,. (3) Self-service storage facilities (administrative permit). (a) District requiring administrative permit approval, (pursuant to the provisions of 971.05):CG. (b) Additional information requirements: 1. A written statement that no commercial activity,vehicular service or repair,or storage of hazardous materials shall be allowed and that this requirement will be included in every tenant's lease agreement; 2. A site plan meeting all of the requirements of Chapter 914. (c) Criteria for self-storage facilities: 1. Storage unit areas shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height from storage buildings; 2. Storage units shall not exceed three hundred (300) square feet in size. 3. Outdoor storage, other than for vehicles and boats, is prohibited. Where outdoor storage of vehicles is to occur, a Type "C" bufferyard shall be provided between the outside storage area and adjacent right-of-way and adjacent properties; 4. All outdoor lights shall be shielded to direct light and glare only onto the self-service storage facility premises.Light and glare shall be deflected,shaded and focused away from all adjoining property; 5. Self-service storage facility sites shall not exceed three (3) acres gross area; 6. Quarters for resident managers may be included within the facility as an accessory use; 7. A Type B landscape buffer shall be required between all structures and adjacent rights- of-way. (4) Self-service storage facilities (special exception). (a) District requiring special exception approval(pursuant to the provisions of[section]971.05).- CL. 71.05):CL. (b) Additional information requirements: 1. A written statement from the applicant stating the following: i. That no commercial activity, vehicular service or repair or storage of hazardous materials shall be allowed and that this requirement will be included •.. in every tenant's lease agreement; and FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\OutdoorStorageattachment.doc ATTACHMENT 86 ii. That only domestic and household goods or personal and noncommercial goods will be kept or stored on the premises. Both of these provisions will be set forth in appropriate and visible signage located on the facility site. 2. A site plan meeting all of the requirements of Chapter 914. (c) Criteria for self-storage facilities: 1. Storage unit interior areas shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 2. Storage units shall not exceed one hundred fifty (15 0) square feet in size. 3. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 4. All outdoor lights shall be shielded to direct light and glare only onto the self-storage facility premises.Light and glare shall be detected, shaded and focused away from all adjoining property and road rights-of-way. 5. Self-service storage facility sites shall not exceed three (3) acres in gross area. 6. Notwithstanding the applicable buffering requirements contained in section 911.10,a Type B landscape buffer with six-foot opaque feature shall be provided between all structures and adjacent properties zoned for single-family residential use. 7. Building containing storage units shall not exceed ten thousand(10,000)square feet in floor area each and shall not exceed one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet of floor area for all buildings. 8. Access shall only be to arterial or collector roadways and in no case through areas zoned for residential use. 9. No utilities (other than air conditioning) may be supplied to storage units. 10. Hours of operation shall be limited to between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy,the applicant shall provide appropriate signage on the site stating the hours of operation of the facility. 11. Buildings may not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\OutdoorStorageattachment.doc ATTACHMENT 287 ......... _... TYPE B BUFFER CANOPY TREES LARGE - 18' IN HEIGHT 4" DBH SMALL = 12' IN HEIGHT 2" D8H UNDERSTORY TREES SHRUBS 30 FOOT DEEP CANOPY TREES = 2 LARGE 2 SMALL TOTAL = 4. UNDERSTORY = 6 SHRUBS = 55 • • 25 FOOT DEEP CANOPY TREES = N 2.5 LARGE N 2.5 SMALL • TOTAL = 5' UNDERSTORY = 8 SHRUBS - 55 ATTXCHUM 3 88 TYPE C BUFFER CANOPY TREES LARGE - IS' IN HEIGHT 4" DBH SMALL = 12' IN HEIGHT 2" DBH UNDERSTORY TREES SHRUBS 20 FOOT DEEP CANOPY TREES = � 1 LARGE 3 SMALL TOTAL = 4 UNDERSTORY : 4 SHRUBS = 40 15 FOOT DEEP CANOPY TREES = I LARGE 3.5 WAU. TOTAL = 4.5 (5) UNDERSTORY = 5 SHRUGS - 40 aTTAcHM,Evc 3 89 12 4 12 3 1 �E 4- 12 EARTHEN BERM 0 WALL & BERM COMBINATION OPTION B 12 4 s c7 WALL & BERM COMBINATION OPTION A W Cfl Z A-t !�a•hCB�f1 t '•? �,t� •"� ,�f+,�``jt��.�'vsr+� dA` t�� .rr:t "'��7++#``r :/ f� �;1'_ 'i't;''� tV RR Z71f, 0, "IfFIl iO Z' jof I a -J4 'o lo" Outdoor Vehicle Storage Regulations of Various Local Governments September 2012 Zoning Districts Allowing Outdoor Vehicle Storage (cars, trucks, semi-trailers, boats on trailers, RVs) Jurisdiction Industrial/Warehouse General Limited/Light Districts Commercial/Business Commercial Districts Districts Brevard County Yes, permitted use Yes, 6' opaque buffer No required all sides Martin County Yes, permitted use: Yes, permitted use: No industrial buffering commercial buffering standards apply standards apply Polk County Yes, permitted use Yes, permitted use No St. Lucie County Yes, buffering required Yes, buffering required No Fellsmere Yes, buffering required Yes, buffering required No Gulfport Yes Yes, 6' — 8' buffer required No Sebastian Yes Allowed only as part of No mini-storage facility, buffering required Vero Beach Yes Yes, buffering required T_ No Indian River County Outdoor Vehicle Storage Regulations Jurisdiction Industrial/Warehouse General Limited/Light Districts Commercial/Business Commercial Districts Districts Indian River County Yes, paved and unpaved Yes: paved automobile Allowed only as part of vehicle storage lots parking lots allowed in CG mini-storage facility allowed in CH, IL, IG; and CH; boat and RV (special exception in CL), buffering required storage allowed as part of a buffering required mini-storage facility (administrative permit in CG), b ffering required FAConmiunity Development\Users\CurDev\LDR Changes\Outdoorvehiclestoragechart.doc ATTACHMENT 4 1 92 POTENTIAL CRITERIA FOR STAND-ALONE OUTDOOR VEHICLE �... STORAGE IN THE CL AND CG DISTRICTS 1. All unpaved vehicle storage areas shall meet the requirements of parking ordinance section 954.09(6). 2. A Type `B" buffer with 6' opaque feature shall be provided around all sides of the outdoor vehicle storage area. 3. Outdoor lighting shall meet the light shielding requirements of the Other Corridors regulations, section 911.22(7)(e)4.a. 4. On site storage of items other than vehicles is prohibited. 5. On site vehicle sales, rentals, repairs, painting, and similar activities are prohibited. 6. Storage of heavy equipment, tractor trailers and other similar vehicles is prohibited. ATTACHME1fT 5 F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\Outdoorvehiclestoragecriteriadraft.doc 1 93 954.080 b. The storage lot surface shall be stabilized, in a manner suitable for the proposed use, as approved by the public works director or his designee. 911.22(7)(e)4a a. Roadway style luminaries (fixtures) such as cobra heads, Nema heads, and the like are prohibited. Wall pack and flood light luminaries are prohibited where the light source would be visible from a roadway, parking area and/or residentially designated area.High intensity discharge(e.g. high pressure sodium,metal halide, mercury vapor, tungsten halogen) lighting fixtures mounted on buildings and poles higher than eighteen (18) feet above parking lot grade, and lighting elements associated with canopies, shall be directed perpendicular to the ground. Other than decorative and low level/low height lighting, no light source or lens shall project above or below a fixture box, shield, or canopy. Each lighting element or fixture associated with a canopy shall be individually recessed into the canopy(above the canopy ceiling). ATTIMIME"T - - 94 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION There was a meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) on Thursday, December 13, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. You may hear an audio of the meeting; review the meeting agenda, backup material and the minutes on the Indian River County website www.ircqov.com/Boards/PZC/2012. Present were members: Vice-Chairman Jens Tripson, District 3 Appointee; Charles Rednour, District 1 Appointee; Dr. Jonathan Day, District 4 Appointee; Brad Emmons, District 5 Appointee; George Hamner and Todd Brognano, Members-at-Large; and Carol Johnson, non-voting School Board Liaison. Absent was Chairman Sam Zimmerman, District 2 Appointee (excused). Also present was IRC staff: Bill DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney; Robert Keating, Community Development Director; Stan Boling, Planning Director; and Reta Smith, Recording Secretary. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. and all stood for the Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minutes ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Mr. Hamner, the members voted unanimously (6-0) to approve the minutes of the meeting of November 8, 2012, as presented. Public Hearing: Vice-Chairman Tripson read the following into the record: A. Consideration of Amendments to Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Chapters 911, 912, and 971 to Allow Outdoor Vehicle Storage Use in the CL (Limited Commercial) and CG (General Commercial) Zoning Districts and To Eliminate Limitations on Length of Recreational Vehicles Stored Outside on Residential Properties [Legislative] PZC/Unapproved 1 December 13, 2012 snIVIMENT Z_ 95 Mr. Stan Boling, IRC Planning Director, reviewed the information contained .. in his memorandum dated December 6, 2012 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Commission Office. He concluded with staff's recommendation that the PZC recommend that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopt the proposed amendment. Mr. Hamner asked about buffering requirements for CG and CL zoning districts adjacent to multi-family zoned property. Mr. Boling explained there was already a type "C" buffer where CL or CG abutted multi-family, so regardless of the specific criteria that we had here the general criteria would apply to any commercial property and there would always be at least a type "C" buffer. Attorney Bill DeBraal, IRC Deputy County Attorney, wondered if the 400 square feet standard for maximum vehicle size was big enough for today's recreational vehicle (RV). Mr. Boling indicated most RVs were still on the order of eight to nine feet wide, and 40 feet seemed to be about the longest of any of the most popular types. Attorney DeBraal observed some RV owners towed boats or an enclosed trailer behind their motor home, and asked if that would be allowed in the storage area. Mr. Boling said it would be permissible provided it was only one of each. Vice-Chairman Tripson opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Mr. George Sigler stated he was receiving a lot of inquiries from individuals wanting to store RVs or boats on his property and confirmed it was not his intent to pave the site. Vice-Chairman Tripson closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Dr. Day, the members voted unanimously (6-0) to approve staff's recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment. PW/Unapproved 2 December 13, 2012 ArrAcHMENT 7 96 Commissioner's Matters There were none. Planning Matters Mr. Boling updated the members on recent action taken by the BCC on planning matters that had been before the PZC. He noted there were no more scheduled meetings of the PZC until January, 2013. Attorney's Matters There were none. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Vice-Chairman Jens Tripson Date Reta Smith, Recording Secretary Date PZC/Unapproved 3 December 13, 2012 ATTAcHWIRT 797 ORDINANCE 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA CONCERNING AMENDMENTS TO ITS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS); PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 911, ZONING, CHAPTER 912, SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, AND CHAPTER 971, REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES, BY AMENDING COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS SECTION 911.10 TO ALLOW VEHICLE STORAGE LOTS AS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE IN THE CL AND CG DISTRICTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 911.15(7) MODIFYING THE LIMITATION ON LENGTH OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES STORED OUTSIDE ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, BY AMENDING SECTION 912.17(3) MODIFYING THE LIMITATION ON LENGTH OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES STORED OUTSIDE ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS; AND BY AMENDING COMMERCIAL SERVICES SECTION 971.12 ESTABLISHING AND MAKING CONSISTENT SPECIFIC LAND USE CRITERIA FOR VEHICLE STORAGE LOTS IN THE CL AND CG DISTRICTS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; CODIFICATION; SEVERABILITY; AND EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHAPTER 911, ZONING, CHAPTER 912, SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, AND CHAPTER 971 REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES, BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION#1: Amend LDR Section 911.10(4), Commercial districts uses table relating to "Transportation �.. and Communication", to read as follows: District PRO OCR MED CN CL CG CH -Transportation and communication Railroad/Bus Transportation Services Local and suburban transit _ _ _ _ _ p p Trucking and courier services - _ _ _ _ _ p Commercial warehousing and storage - - _ _ _ _ p Moving and storage _ _ _ _ _ _ p Trucking terminals _ _ _ _ _ _ p Self-service storage facilities - - - - S A P Outdoor storage _ _ _ _ _ _ A Vehicle storage lot (paved/unpaved) - - - - -S -S P Post Office p p p p p p P Water transport services - _ _ _ _ _ p Air transport services _ _ _ _ _ _ P Pipelines _ _ _ _ _ _ p Heli ort/heli ad - - SRecycling centers _ _ _ _ _ _ A Travel and tour agencies - p _ _ p p _ Freight transport arrangement - p p p Communications Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 1 84ike thr-oughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971 (vehiclestoragerecveh).doc ATTAC14MEMT ORDINANCE 2013- Telephone and telegraph _ p _ _ p p p Radio and television broadcasting - P p p p �... Cable and pa T.V. _ p Communications towers wireless facilities A A A A A A A Communications towers (non-wireless facilities)4 Amateur radio (accessory use Less than 80 feet P p p p p p p 80 feet or taller(see 971.44(4) for special S S S S S S S criteria Commercial Up to 70 feet: Camouflaged P p p p p p p Non-camouflaged P p p p p p p 70 feet to 150 feet: Camouflaged A A A A A A A Monopole (mininrarh of 2 users) A A A A A A A Not camouflaged and not monopole S S S S S S S Over 150 feet: All tower types (see 971.44(1) for special criteria Public and private utilities, limited A A A A A A A Public and private utilities, heavy - - _ _ _ _ S SECTION#2: Amend LDR Section 911.15(7), General Provisions by deleting limitation on length of recreational vehicles, to read as follows: (7) Unenclosed storage of recreational vehicles, trailers and boats. (a) Any recreational vehicle not in normal daily usage for transportation of the occupants of the residence shall be considered as "stored" for purposes of this chapter. (b) Unenclosed storage of trailers, campers and boats; restrictions in residential zoning districts. Recreational vehicles and boats may be stored on any lot. However, any trailers, campers or boats which are stored in unenclosed areas on any single-family or two family lot in any residential zoning district shall meet the following standards: 1. Ownership of recreational vehicles and boats; authorized storage. Such storage shall be limited to vehicles owned by the occupant(s) of the residence or the house guests of the occupant(s). 2. Limitation on number of recreational vehicles. Not more than one recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be stored in an unenclosed area Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 2 StFi#e tkreu& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance R\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971(vehiclestoragerecveh).doe ATTACHMENT eq 9 ORDINANCE 2013- upon each site, except that one additional recreational vehicle per dwelling 1...V1 unit may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six (6) weeks in any one-year period. 3. Limitation on number of boats. No more than one boat per dwelling unit shall be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site except that one additional boat per dwelling may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six (6) weeks in any one-year period. 4. Location of unenclosed storage areas. Such storage shall not be located in any required front or side yard, or any easement; except that such vehicles may be stored on a designated driveway. 5. Licensing. Recreational vehicles and boat trailers shall have a valid motor vehicle license at all times. 6. Use limitations. Recreational vehicles and boats shall not be used for office or commercial purposes, nor for sleeping, housekeeping or living quarters while so stored. 7. No public facilities hook-ups. No service facilities, such as water, sanitary, or electrical connections shall be attached; except a temporary electrical extension connected to the vehicle for battery charging or to facilitate repair is permitted. 8. Limitation on lig-h overall size of recreational vehicles;_ vrianees.. Consistent with the Chapter 901 definition of `Recreational vehicle", the overall size of a recreational vehicle stored outside on a residentially zoned lot shall not exceed four hundred (400) square feet (vehicle length multiplied by width). No ree:eational vehiele so stored _Y two (32) feet in length, provided that in the event of undue hardship petitions for- a var-ianee to this ehapter as to T'hVe length re ' i nay be filed and heard by the indian River- County heed—e --ngadjustment. The beard of zeningadjustrent, in its eensidefatioii of any suer appeal, may eensider-the size Tf=the ehiele, the lot size in question and the availability of adequate safeguards to pr-etec4 the neighberheed. (c) Storage of recreational vehicles and boats in multifamily residential areas. In any apartment, condominium or other multifamily use, recreational vehicle and boat storage may be permitted in a portion of a project which is specifically designated for recreational vehicle and/or boat parking; however, screening measures may also be required as a condition of site plan approval. No recreational vehicle or boat may be stored in the parking lot of a multifamily development, unless such parking lot has been designated on the approved site plan for the development as recreational vehicle storage area. Sold Underline: Additions to Ordinance Strike.w..eugh: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 3 F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971(vehiclestoragerecveh).doc 100 00 ORDINANCE 2013- SECTION#3: Amend LDR Section 912.17(3), by deleting limitation on length of recreational vehicles, to read as follows: (3) Unenclosed storage of recreational vehicles, trailers and boats. (a) [Generally.] Any recreational vehicle not in normal daily usage for transportation of the occupants of the residence shall be considered as "stored" for purposes of this chapter. (b) Unenclosed storage of trailers, campers and boats; restrictions in residential zoning districts. Recreational vehicles and boats may be stored on any lot. However, any trailers, campers or boats which are stored in unenclosed areas on any single-family or two-family lot in any residential zoning district shall meet the following standards: 1. Ownership of recreational vehicles and boats; authorized storage. Such storage shall be limited to vehicles owned by the occupant(s) of the residence or the house guests of the occupant(s). 2. Limitation on number of recreational vehicles. No more than one recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site, except that one additional recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any one- year period. 3. Limitation on number of boats. No more than one boat per dwelling unit shall be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site except that one additional boat per dwelling may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six(6) weeks in any one-year period. 4. Location of unenclosed storage areas. Such storage shall not be located in any required front or side yard, or any easement; except that such vehicles may be stored on any designated driveway. 5. Licensing. Recreational vehicles and boat trailers shall have a valid motor vehicle license at all times. 6. Use limitations. Recreational vehicles and boats shall not be used for office or commercial purposes, nor for sleeping, housekeeping or living quarters while so stored. ., 7. No public facilities hook-ups. No service facilities, such as water, sanitary, or electrical connections shall be attached; except a Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance &AEe thraugh: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 4 F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971 (vehiclestoragerecveh).doc ATTACHME14T 1FO 1 ORDINANCE 2013- temporary electrical extension connected to the vehicle for battery charging or to facilitate repair is permitted. 8. Limitation on length overall size of recreational vehicles; variances. Consistent with the Chapter 901 definition of "Recreational vehicle" the overall area of a recreational vehicle stored_ outside on a residentially zoned lot shall not exceed four hundred (400) square feet (vehicle length multiplied by width). e i„touv stored >,ll f thiAy twe (32) feet in length, provided that in the event of undtle hardship petifieisr —; va-ianee to this e t--ate to the lent �ments maybe filed and heard by the indian Rivep-Ge� D,ffir- of Orlit, board o f a adjustment;�, +« - its , a*y ueh appeal, fna�, eensidef the size o +�z+t size t}le-fio i h e h e e a SECTION#4: Amend LDR Section 971.12, Commercial services, to read as follows: (1) Building material sales and lumberyards (administrative permit). (a) Districts requiring administrative permit approval, (pursuant to the provisions of 971.04): CG. (b) Additional information requirements: 1. A written statement defining the general inventory of materials to be sold on the premises; 2. Statements disclosing the projected percentage of total sales to be derived from wholesale activities; 3. A site plan showing the location of all principal structures and all on-site storage areas. (c) Criteria for construction material sales: 1. All materials to be sold on the premises must be completely screened from adjacent properties and roadways; 2. On-site vehicular storage shall be limited to those vehicles used in the operation of establishment; 3. Such establishments shall not include the manufacture of structural wood �.. components, roof trusses, wall units and other activities requiring the assembly of wood products; Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 5 Strike th-��: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance ^ F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971(vehiclestoragerecveh).doc �.fT�/a 1��B�x T n 2 ORDINANCE 2013- 4. All wholesale activities shall be accessory to retail sales conducted on the site. (2) Outdoor storage (unenclosed) (administrative permit). (a) Districts requiring administrative permit approval, (pursuant to the provisions of 971.04): CH. (b) Additional information requirements: A site plan showing the location, dimensions, and area of all enclosed storage areas and proposed unenclosed outdoor storage areas (which shall consist of the entire area for storage and spacing between merchandise items). (c) Criteria for outdoor storage (unenclosed): 1. Outdoor storage shall be accessory in terms of use to the principal use, and in no case shall the outdoor- storage area exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the total square footage of the principal structure; 2. Items allowed to be stored outdoors shall be limited to vehicles and equipment used in the operation of the establishment, stocking and sales display of items allowed to be sold (retail) in the CH district; 3. For purposes of calculating parking requirements for outdoor storage of sales display items, the standards used for the principal use shall apply; 4. All building setback requirements shall apply to the outdoor storage area(s); 5. All outdoor storage areas containing stock and sales display items shall be completely screened (horizontal and vertical) from adjacent properties and roadways; 6. The surface material(s) criteria for the outdoor storage area must be approved by the public works department. (3) Self-service storage facilities (administrative permit). (a) District requiring administrative permit approval, (pursuant to the provisions of 971.05): CG. (b) Additional information requirements: 1. A written statement that no commercial activity, vehicular service or repair, or storage of hazardous materials shall be allowed and that this .. requirement will be included in every tenant's lease agreement; Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance S`fike t reugh: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 6 F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971 (vehiclestoragerecveh).doc ATTACNMENT 100 ORDINANCE 2013- 2. A site plan meeting all of the requirements of Chapter 914. (c) Criteria for self-storage facilities: 1. Storage unit areas shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height from storage buildings; 2. Storage units shall not exceed three hundred(300) square feet in size. 3. Outdoor storage, other than for vehicles and-beats, is prohibited. Where provided between the outside storage afea and adjaeeat right of way adjaeent Outdoor storage of vehicles may be approved upon a finding by the planning and zoning commission that the criteria of 971.12(5) are satisfied; 4. All outdoor lights shall be shielded to direct light and glare only onto the self-service storage facility premises. Light and glare shall be deflected, shaded and focused away from all adjoining property; 5. Self-service storage facility sites shall not exceed three (3) acres gross area; 6. Quarters for resident managers may be included within the facility as an accessory use; 7. A Type B landscape buffer shall be required between all structures and adjacent rights-of-way. (4) Self-service storage facilities (special exception). (a) District requiring special exception approval (pursuant to the provisions of section 971.05): CL. (b) Additional information requirements: 1. A written statement from the applicant stating the following: i. That no commercial activity, vehicular service or repair or storage of hazardous materials shall be allowed and that this requirement will be included in every tenant's lease agreement; and ii. That only domestic and household goods or personal and noncommercial goods will be kept or stored on the premises. Both of these provisions will be set forth in appropriate and visible signage located on the facility site. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 7 Su4ke thmu& Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 104 F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971(vehiclestoragerecveh).doc ORDINANCE 2013- 2. A site plan meeting all of the requirements of Chapter 914. (c) Criteria for self-storage facilities: 1. Storage unit interior areas shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 2. Storage units shall not exceed one hundred fifty(150) square feet in size. 3. Outdoor storage is prohibited, except that outdoor storage of vehicles may be approved upon a finding by the board of county commissioners that the criteria of 971.12(5) are satisfied. 4. All outdoor lights shall be shielded to direct light and glare only onto the self-storage facility premises. Light and glare shall be defected, shaded and focused away from all adjoining property and road rights-of-way. 5. Self-service storage facility sites shall not exceed three (3) acres in gross area. 6. Notwithstanding the applicable buffering requirements contained in section 911.10, a Type B landscape buffer with six-foot opaque feature shall be provided between all structures and adjacent properties zoned for single-family residential use. .•- 7. Building containing storage units shall not exceed ten thousand (10,000) square feet in floor area each and shall not exceed one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet of floor area for all buildings. 8. Access shall only be to arterial or collector roadways and in no case through areas zoned for residential use. 9. No utilities (other than air conditioning) may be supplied to storage units. 10. Hours of operation shall be limited to between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall provide appropriate signage on the site stating the hours of operation of the facility. 11. Buildings may not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height. (5) Vehicle storage lot(pavedlunpaved). (a) Districts requiring special exception approval (pursuant to the provisions of section 971.05): CL, CG. (b) Additional information requirements: Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 8 Stfike Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012- 911,912 and 971(vehiclestoragerecveh).doc ATT`cuty' ORDINANCE 2013- 1 A written statement acknowledging that no items other than vehicles will be stored on site and that vehicle sales, rentals, repairs, painting ""M- and similar activities will not be conducted on site. 2 A site plan meeting all applicable requirements of Chapters 914 and 954, and showing security improvements (including fencing and entry management for site users), gates, outdoor lighting, light shielding, and buffering improvements. (c) Criteria for vehicle storaze lots: 1 All unpaved vehicle storage areas shall meet the storage lot surface requirements of parking ordinance section 954.08(6)b. 2 A Type "B" buffer with 6' opaque feature shall be provided where the vehicle storage area is adjacent to property with a residential land use designation Where the vehicle storage area is adiacent to a collector roadway, an arterial roadway, or property that is not zoned CH, IL, or IG and that also has a non-residential land use designation, a Type "C" buffer with 6' opaque feature is required. Where the vehicle storage area abuts property zoned CH, IL, or IG, no special buffer type ("A", "B", or"C") is required. a Where fencing and vines are used to provide the required opaque feature, vining plants shall substitute for required buffer area shrubs. 3 Outdoor lighting shall meet the light shielding requirements of the Other Corridors regulations, section 911.22(7)(e)4.a. 4 On site storage of semi-trailers and heavy equipment such as dump trucks, bucket trucks, and similar construction-related equipment is prohibited. 5 On site storage of construction materials, merchandise, and items other than vehicles is prohibited. 6 On site vehicle sales, rentals, repairs, painting, and similar activities are prohibited. SECTION#4: SEVERABILITY If any clause, section or provision of this Ordinance shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any cause or reason, the same shall be eliminated from this Ordinance and the remaining portion of this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect and be as valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated therein. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 9 $#ilk Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance O F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971(vehiclestoragerecveh).doc ORDINANCE 2013- SECTION#5: REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES The provisions of any other Indian River County ordinance that are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. SECTION #6: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or any other appropriate word. SECTION #7: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Journal on the day of , 2013, for a public hearing to be held on the day of , 2013, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner , and Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller BY: Deputy Clerk °�••- This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 10 Strike throughi Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971 (vehiclestoragerecveh).doc a-r-ra P 14ME i{? t07 ORDINANCE 2013- '�- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY 1` = Alan Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS i Robert M. Keating, AICP;/Commlelnevelopment Director Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 1 1 St h: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 0 F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2012-_911,912 and 971 (vehiclestoragerecveh).doc r V F { C i LDR Amendment Outdoor Vehicle Storage in CL & CG Districts Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2013 N low a 3 m o W a Amendment History ■ BCC request from George Sigler : owns CL zoned property ■ BCC discussion September 2012 and again October 2012 after reviewing staff analysis 0 �. Z Amendment History ( Cont ■ BCC directed staff to initiate LDR amendment : Allow stand alone outdoor vehicle storage lots in CL and CG as special exception use ■ Incorporate buffer criteria and restrictions on types of vehicles stored 0 � 3 I Existing Regulations ■ Stand alone unpaved/paved outdoor vehicle storage lots permitted in CH , IL, and IG districts with buffering ■ No restrictions on type of vehicles stored � 4 q 4¢ 633 by e q 0 6820 Ory t ME 0 5 U` Existing Regulations ( cont Id ) ■ Accessory outdoor vehicle storage allowed at mini-storage facilities in CG ( but not in CL) 0 � 6 4JJ -vE fi y ✓iQ r ,y AwIll IPI mw On 11 .. OL' m, tS -099 , :t t �. ,� � °'�" m �"*��,��� `x'y �<c +�✓ sof x [3 .a F 00 Y a a Av"41 :f• M � Y.�• � � k � die' Q � �" + � W �j 8y J �'� � >, a- �,f' t.� d"� � �� � ��•� ���. �� �� � w -may s N f v1 v N Other Local Governments ■ Information from 8 local governments ■ All allow outdoor vehicle storage lots in general commercial/business districts ■ Buffering required ■ No restrictions on vehicle type ■ None allow outdoor vehicle storage in limited/light commercial districts 4 �v s �o BCC Directive ■ Allow but carefully regulate ■ Special exception process ( notice, public hearing) ■ Criteria ( 6 criteria reviewed ) CIq ,o m e Proposed Amendment ■ Allows stand alone paved/unpaved outdoor vehicle storage lots in CL and CG as special exception use 090 � 11 Proposed Amendment ( cont 'd ) SIX CRITERIA 1. Parking surface approved by Public Works 2. Type B buffer with 6-' opaque feature adjacent to residential. Type C buffer with 6' opaque feature along major roads and adjacent to districts other than CH, IL, IG N-1 qz • Fencing with vines option 12 TYPE B BUFFER 25 FOOT CHEEP CANOPY TREES 3 2 �E . . ' TOTAL = 5 SHRUBS 55 3 1 C1'P 13 TYPE C BUFFER h } 3 15 FOOT DEEP CANOPY TREES =� 1 LGE 3.5 SMALL. TOTAL = 4.5 (5 UNDERSTORY = 5 SHRUBS - 40 a 14 Proposed Amendment ( cont 'd ) 3 . Light shielding 4. No storage of semi-trailers, dump trucks, similar vehicles 5 . No storage of materials 6 . No vehicle sales or repairs o C'915 Proposed Amendment ( cont 'd ) Other items • Modifies mini-storage regulations for CG and CL zoned project : accessory vehicle storage lots subject to new criteria q ,6 U Proposed Amendment ( cont 'd ) Other items • Modifies regulation for an RV parked outside at a residence : replaces 32' maximum length with 400 sq . ft. maximum area 0 17 PZC Recommendation The PZC voted 6-0 to recommend that the Board adopt the proposed LDR amendment ordinance RECOMMENDATION That the Board direct staff to make any necessary changes to the proposed ordinance Announce intent to adopt ordinance at February 5, 2013 5 : 01 pm hearing �9 19 44 AREA LOCATIONS Legend Y' CL CH, IL, IG `. Single-Family L ` 5 -86TH ST .o ti v` 77TH ST- 65TH T 65TH ST I �2 71 —49TH ST- a{ 37TH ST sH Y H ' .. 16TH ST— . f oa r' —^f N 8TH ST JI m .r N 1ST.ST SW i 9TH ST SW 17TH ST-SW Q 25TH ST_SW ATACf6 # T 20 i� P.O. Box 1268 Vero Beach, Florida 32961 562-2315 qqp ®—tee COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Debbi Vickers who on oath says that she is Manager Display Advertising of the Press Journal, a daily newspaper published in Indian River County, Florida; that ! L 6 ' W'`<` 'l ►'r Ul" '_ e-if billed to t�„ f: 0V1 'N'tvrt� f E� �` Ci ►'� it�'tC"i 1I ) was published in said newspaper in the issue(s) of Sworn to and subscribed before me this J/"" day of A_D. :eL�- .........On H P n 6:a s).....U■aq.�..UO� U� CARINE POLICARE j 1►s`'�P Comm#DD0903382 "s r Expires QQS2013 Rosr. `' V Anu.un. . ..Florida.. . in ..... /} Advertising Manager unfamiliar territory. Using their wings to .� All Games Pay$50 -- _; Razorbills are a pen dive underwater, ra-con- 9 feed mainly on j1� �Tw siders traveling south for schooling fish such as her Q 1 1 the winter to mean head ring and on crustaceans '' GARDENS ing for New York and New and marine worms that ° On US 1,1/2 mile,North of CR 510 Jersey after spending the live in cold northern At- f Mon-Sat 9-4:30•Sun 9-4 M_: summer in North Ameri- lantic waters—or at least A Di t c0.pn&Tut wa.°nw[: 589-5835 .A can breeding colonies they usually do. Car et www.rockcitygardens.com on rocky islands or cliffs When Sandy slammed i $119oo'tup[e,,000sF> scattered from Greenland ashore in late October,the Cleaning to Maine. superstorm likely also tore Mix-N-Match $119oo-c:°Faae<une.>°p[ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING But this year the razor- through the marine food ° bills just kept flying south chain,making it more dif- Tile&Grout F.°m 513900•cup tp 3c se) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Coun'/ in a.never-before-seen ficult for razorbills to find Dryer Vent Help,pie°ep[15— migration pattern that enough to eat.Others have Y F.°m S89oo•F°=.ep,e,eF���e°�„ Commissioners of Indian River County,Florida shall has bird experts buzzing theorized that warmer Cleaning hold two public hearings at which parties in Interest and Florida bird watchers North Atlantic waters have and CIIIZenS Shall have an opportunity t0 be heard, rushing for their identifi- made them less productive. =m===••1=,ate,ma o', cation guides. Razorbills' survival 772-770-2488 in the County Commission Chambers of the County "It's an amazing event," instincts kicked in.They �C20007 Q�u 9(C=�g Administration Complex located at 1801 27th Street, said Andy Kratter,orni- headed south looking for A Divi,ion of Corpet&Tile W°reh°une thology collection manag- food. Most of them are RCRCCe ifiedFirm Vero Beach,Florida on: er at the Florida Museum a&r a yommer'sashaterbreedng FIRST HEARING: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 of Natural History. "It's summer's banner breeding exciting,but it's very sad:' season,another possible ,4r ray3 rte}1 `, ii4/'J" xm "' at 9105 a.m.,and; That's because many of complicating factor to the ;, ., `' = •", , the razorbills are dying in food search,Kratter said. r SECOND HEARING:Tuesday February 5,2013 Florida. Florida wildlife And they're still mov- ,ws €',.. r� at5:01 p.m. rehabilitation clinics have ing,Kratter said. 8g -3%1 ;,1 I to consideramendments to its Land Development ' r 2008 JEEP WRANGLER SAHARARegulations (LDRs); providing for amendments to Lifted and " fa chdevelopment,and ch pter9711pter 911, zoning, tr �egulation12, sfor s specific Y Loaded!!! land uses,by amending commercial districts section HURRY!!! �s � x 911.10 to allow vehicle storage lots as a special 4 — ONLY exception use in the CL and CG districts;by amending fr4f 1I section 911.15 7 modifying the limitation on length �2� GJ�O t �,� ( ) fY 9 9 ' t` 'rte; of recreational vehicles stored outside on residential COGGIN HONDA OF FORT PIERCE•866-485-7330x wwwagginhondaftpiercecom4450SOUTH USI,FTPIERCE,FL34982 r lots, by amending section 912.17(3) modifying ,,"^l „°«a,,,aI I the limitation on length of recreational vehicles stored outside on residential lots; and by amending RIVERSIDE CHILDREN'S THEATRE commercial services section 971.12 establishing and making consistent specific land use criteria for vehicle storage lots in the CL and CG districts; providing re and by of conflicting g for repeal p g provisions; codification;severability;and effective date. Said ordinance,if adopted,will allow outdoor vehicle • storage uses within the CL (Limited Commercial) and CG (General Commercial)zoning districts as a Classes begin January 22! special exception use subject to specific criteria. wlnteNsprPng sessionThursday,January 17at 7:00 M. A copy of the proposed ordinances will be available Dance Immigration's Impact on at the Planning Division office located in Building"A” - January 22-May 17 Florida and the U.S. 41'' of the County Administration Complex, beginning * 'Theatre January 22-My 10 Stepick has been studying 4 January 18,2013.Anyone who may wish to appeal ONLINE REGISTRATION immigration and its impact on , NOW OPENI Miami for 30 years.He has a any decision,which may be made at this meeting, publishedarticles nine books,many ;= - journalalarucles and boowill need to ensure that a verbatim record of the k _ �t r- irl; apte•s�n thcto ,c and This + proceedings is made,which Includes testimony and Landis ed as"superior for pd has been described as"sevidence upon which the appeal is based. a providing a'new framework for Dr.Alex Stepick,Director RANiBliriD understanding immigration and acrefess r-linmgretien Please direct planning-related questions to the inteiethme relations." &Ethnicit Institute-F.I.U. ��+ current development section at 226-1242. S�ORi1=+� e ANYONE WHO NEEDS SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MUST CONTACT THE � eI-SOEIcente 5# P i s°p °n,nv° COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ADA) COORDINATOR AT 2261223 AT LEAST i � ���'r -� v" (772)778 5249" TM 1590 27th Ave. Vero-leach FL 32960 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING. (On the SE cor [16.1 St I IN]h,pA uur�ae nr INDIAN RIVER COUNTY riverside Riverside n'sPar Theatre - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3250 R s each, Park Drive ,; Vero eeach,FL 32963 lr n T j BY-s Joseph E.FIeSCher,Chairman /0(?.- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COA01ISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: ®.V, � I 1! N VeZC) PHONE: SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: lfylp l f'�o,pJ �� rev 1 ea ) -apD 1 Any U p IS A PRESENTATION PLANNED? YES NO IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED YES NO *vow IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION a YES NO WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION06 ae-s 1} s a- 9b1TCy ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? YES NO WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? 'ImpA,Gfi );Ee )03 �Q>ekSFE0 e-, eye Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: E-Mail Fax Joseph A.Baird Mail MEETING DATE: Aa Hand Delivered Phone 109 PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM: 1/22/13 v Ofce of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W. Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: �f AIan S. Polackwich, Sr. — County Attorney S41 DATE: January 15, 2013 SUBJECT: Notice of Attorney-Client Session re FVP Miami Lakes LLC v. Indian River County, pending in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Case No. 312010CA074993 Notice is hereby given that the Indian River County Attorney desires an attorney- client session with the Board of County Commissioners regarding litigation styled FVP Miami Lakes LLC v. Indian River County, pending in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Case No. 312010CA074993 at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, February 5, 2013. The subject matter of the meeting will be settlement negotiations and strategy relating to litigation expenses. The session will commence at an open meeting in the County Commission Chambers located on the first floor of Building A of the County Administration Complex, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, will continue at a closed meeting in the County Commissioners' Conference Room located on the second floor of Building A of the County Administration Complex and will terminate at an open meeting in the County Commission Chambers. The estimated time of the attorney-client session is forty-five (45) minutes. Present at the meeting will be Commissioners Joseph E. Flescher, Wesley S. Davis, Tim Zorc, Peter D. O'Bryan, and Bob Solari. Also present will be County Attorney Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Administrator Joseph A. Baird, and a certified court reporter. nhm _ i is �v"D�"aved Dale i 3 APPROVED FOR wf,. - � T� � - - _ f � ko'ft�L� � F COUNTY ATTORNEY. -- _ 1 O PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS: 1122113 v Ofceof INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W. Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners M: Alan S. Polackwich Sr. — Count Atttornl FROM: Y Y DATE: January 14, 2013 RE: Notice of Public Hearing Scheduled for February 5, 2013 The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 5, 2013, to consider adoption of a proposed ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 100.03(4) OF THE CODE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ("THE CODE"), CODIFYING AND PUBLISHING THE ORDINANCES UP TO AND INCLUDING SUPPLEMENT 94 THERETO, READOPTING THE CODE, DESIGNATING THE CODE AS THE BEST EVIDENCE OF THE CURRENT LAW OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. lnhm Awv��d NP-PROVED FOR'' Legal 3.C,C WEETt t" gi)L(!e (leUr) _aU€� Y -- ORNEY,j Risk tiP`fir. 111 ��gtvER Office of the Z INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Michael C. Zito, Assistant County Administrator MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners FROM: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator t DATE: January 15, 2013 SUBJECT: 1725 17`" Avenue - Old Jail Property At the Board of County Commission Meeting of November 6, 2012, Staff reported that the City `WWI of Vero Beach was no longer using the property located at 1725 17`h Avenue, generally known as the Old Jail Property. Based on the agreement with the City of Vero Beach in 1988, the property reverts to Indian River County, and staff requested direction from the Commission related to its disposition. Initially the Board directed staff to declare the property as surplus, and approved selling it by auction or sealed bid. Subsequently, at the Board of County Commission Meeting of December 4`h, the topic was discussed again, and staff was directed to postpone the sale and consider options related to making the building and property available to the Boys & Girls Club of Indian River County and/or St. Francis Manor. This past week I received information relayed to me by the Boys & Girls Club of Indian River County, that The Boys & Girls Clubs of Indian River County and St. Francis Manor propose that the land be split and added to their respective current $1 per year leases as an opportunity for both organizations to set aside land for future expansion. INFORMATION FOR ANALYSIS: This property is located on approximately 3.8 acres, and the structure consists of 16,336 square feet. Currently the Property Appraiser lists this property's CAMA value (2012) at $841,970. $685,900 for the building, $144,400 for the land, and $11,670 as miscellaneous. 1.0.- 112 In 2005, the Board of County Commission decided to discontinue the lease of the Sunshine Physical Therapy property, and sold the land and building to Sunshine Physical Therapy for $352,000. This property is located adjacent to the Old Jail property on approximately 1.41 acres, and the structure consists of 9,676 square feet. Currently the Property Appraiser lists this property's CAMA value (2012) at $673,900. $599,100 for the building, $53,580 for the land, and $21,220 as miscellaneous. A finalized joint proposal from the Boys & Girls Clubs of Indian River County and St. Francis Manor was not provided. Staff has not been advised of their intentions for the structure, and is unclear if they anticipate the County will demolish it. Demolition is estimated at $45,000. The Commission recently directed staff to review the County's assets and determine what could potentially be disposed of or sold. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the sale of this property by one of the following means: Option 1: Sell the property at fair market value based on an appraisal Option 2: Sell the property by auction Option 3: Sell the property by sealed bid APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Indian River Co Ap roved Date Administrator f I-711-3 By: Legal /A Budget L6 t3 FO January 22, 2013 1"... 113 BOYS�GIRLS CLUBS River County OF INDIAN RIV€R OAt1NTY January 13, 2013 JAN 16 2013 Board of Directors OfTice of the Mr. Joseph A. Baird Sherman Hotchkiss County Administrator County Administrator Co-Chairman Indian River County Jay McNamara 1801 27th Street Co-Chairman Vero Beach, FL. 32960-3365 Bill Munn Co-Chairman Dear Mr. Baird, Ross Cotherman Treasurer The Boys & Girls Clubs of Indian River County and St. Francis Manor would Edwin Mellett like to propose to you and the County Commissioners that the land where the old Secretary jail currently sits at 1725 17th Avenue be split and added to our respective, Fred M. Blaicher,Jr. current$1 per year leases, thereby expanding the land that both organizations Sherry Ann Dayton currently lease from the county. This is an opportunity for bath organizations to Sam DiFeo set aside land for future expansion. Mary Grimm Bill Helmly Gerard P.Lynch The property owned by the County borders the Vero Beach Boys & Girls Club Roger Lynch to the north and St. Francis Manor to the west. Sheila Mills Jean Oglethorpe Neither we, nor St. Francis Manor have an interest in purchasing the land as was Rod Parker previously suggested at the County Commissioner's meeting on November 61h Virginia Powers At that time the Commissioners agreed to give us until mid-March to develop a Jerry Sheehan plan of action. Since then, we have decided to pursue adding the land to our Donald Shropshire John Spooner current leases as the best course of action. Barry Wiksten We respectfully request to put this proposal to a vote by the Commissioners at Boys&Girls Clubs the meeting scheduled for January 22, 2013. of Indian River County,Inc. 1729171'Avenue Thank you for your consideration. Vero Beach,FL 32960 Tel 772-299-7449 Fax 772-299-3840 www.BGCIRC.org Elizabeth L. Thomason Executive Director CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Cc: Louis Schacht, Board Chairman, St. Francis Manor Jay McNamara, Board Co-Chairman, Boys & Girls Clubs of Indian River County A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION(#CHI 1444)AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING TOLL-FREE(800)435-7352 WITHIN THE STATE. REGISTRATION DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT,APPROVAL,OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE. 114 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA d �t MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator FROM: Robert M. Keating, ICP; C mmuni evelopment Director DATE: January 16, 2013 SUBJECT: Go-Line Bus Hub Status Update It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 22, 2013. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS Recently,County staff informed the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)that staff from the County and the City of Vero Beach had reached an impasse in attempting to negotiate a lease for City owned property on 17`'' w.. Street where the Go-Line Bus Hub was proposed to be located. Although the County had secured a $1.1 million Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grant to construct the new bus hub,the BCC,at its December 18,2012 meeting,approved staff's recommendation to reject a draft lease agreement for the 17'hStreet hub site because the City was unwilling to accept landscape maintenance responsibility for the proposed hub. Currently, the Go-Line Bus Hub is located in the parking lot south of the County Administration complex. While that location works well for the Go-Line, the hub has generated complaints from residents of the adjacent neighborhood. Also, the City has indicated that the existing hub location does not have the appropriate zoning for a bus hub use. In fact, those are reasons that county staff has spent considerable time attempting to find a suitable alternative location for the hub and why the City owned 17th Street site was considered for the new hub. Subsequent to the BCC's decision to reject the proposed lease with the City for the 17"'Street hub site,the City sent the County a code enforcement citation, warning the County that the current bus hub use of the county administration south parking lot is a violation of the City zoning code and ordering the County to correct the violation. To correct the violation, the County must cease use of the site for a bus hub. ANALYSIS As indicated in staff's report for the December 18,2012 BCC meeting,staff proposes to relocate the Go-Line bus hub to the County Administration Building campus north of 26"'Street. Not only does that site have the correct zoning for a bus hub,it is also adequately separated from the Original Town neighborhood in the City of Vero Beach. FACommunity Development\Users\CDADMIN\AGENDA\2013\Go-Line Bus Hub Status Update 012213.doc 1 115 Based on preliminary analysis,staff has determined that the bus hub can be located in the existing parking lot west of Building A on the county administration campus and that the$1.1 million FTA grant can be used for bus hub design and construction on that site. Using the hub layout originally proposed for the l 7th Street site, staff has developed several site designs for the hub. While each of the designs results in a loss of parking spaces in the west lot, those spaces are currently used for county vehicle and staff parking. With the hub relocation,that parking can be relocated to the south parking lot where the existing hub is located. There are several factors that will influence the design of the relocated hub. These are: • Extension of 20th Avenue. If the city of Vero Beach opts to extend 20`h Avenue south from Aviation Boulevard,the new hub could be located in the western part of the west parking lot,and the existing access drive from Aviation Boulevard to 26th Street could be eliminated. • Use of 20"'Avenue Right-of-Way. If the City of Vero Beach opts not to extend 20th Avenue,there may be an opportunity for the bus hub to partially locate in the 20t1i Avenue Right-of-Way area. That would allow the County to keep the existing Aviation Boulevard to 26th Street access in the same general alignment as it is presently. • No extension of 206 Avenue and no use of 20th Avenue Right-of-Way. If 20th Avenue is not extended and if the 20th Avenue Right-of-Way is not available for use,the hub design will be more constricted, and the Aviation to 26th Access may be more circuitous. On January 18, 2013, City, County, and Senior Resource Association staff are scheduled to meet on the proposed hub design. At that time, the parties will also discuss an extended timeframe for the County to comply with the City's zoning citation notice. Once a general design has been developed,staff will present that design to the BCC for its consideration. At this time,staff recommends that the BCC conceptually approve relocating the Go-Line Bus Hub to the parking lot west of Building A. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners conceptually approve relocating the Go-Line Bus Hub to the parking lot west of Building A on the County administration campus and authorize staffto work on the bus hub engineering design. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River Co, Approved Date r r . tL Admin. 1 7 i FOR: Q{� Legal 7 3 Budget fj BY: Dept. 1 lk i Risk Mgr. �..- FACommunity Development\Users\CDADMIN\AGENDA\2013\Go-Line Bus Hub Status Update 012213.doc 2 116 /34 Attorney's Matters-B.C.C. 01.22.13 v Ofc of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY `�— ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: ���( Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney DATE: January 15, 2013 SUBJECT: 2013 Committees Vacancies -- Appointments On September 13, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution 2011-072, which assigned to the County Attorney's Office the task of monitoring committee member terms, and overseeing the process of annual appointments and reappointments. Pursuant to this process, on December 11, 2012, the Board reappointed a significant number of incumbent committee members to another term (that is, members presently serving on a committee who are eligible for another term, and who asked to be reappointed). This agenda item is to consider appointment of applicants to committee vacancies. Committee vacancies have been advertised on the County's website and on Channel 27. Attached is a list of committee vacancies and qualified applicants (note: several vacancies are designated positions — that is, the committee member must be an architect, engineer, etc. Applicants for designated positions who do not meet the required criteria have not been included on the attached list). The Board should review the list and decide which applicants it desires to appoint. • APPLICANTS' RESUMES ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE COMMISSIONER OFFICE AREA • The Board should be aware that even after filling the attached vacancies, a significant number of other committee vacancies still exist Indian River Co. A ved Date APPROVED FOR JANUARY 22, 2013 Admin. B.C.C. MEETING—ATTORNEY'S MATTERS Co.Atty. -f Budget Dept. - -- COUNTYATTORNEY Risk Mgr. - --- R41«ornevlLindaIGENER9LBCCWgendadlemoslCommirlee Terms 09.docx 117 Board of County Commissioners January 15, 2013 �•• Page Two RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney recommends that the Board review applicant resumes, and appoint committee members from section A of the attached list as the Board deems appropriate. ATTACHMENT. Committee Vacancy List ASP:LAC Attachment as noted above FW w—yv daIGENEULO CCWgenda Afv-AC—,WmeTerms09.d- 118 COMMITTEE VACANCIES - BCC APPOINTEES 1. AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE (2 year term) • One (1) vacancy for Representative of Horticulture Industry • Two (2) applications received o David Howard o Robert J. Lindsey, Jr. 2. CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (4 year term) • One (1)vacancy for Member-at-Large • Two (2) applications received o Glenda Swanson-Massa o Paul Reeves 3. CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (3 year term, unless otherwise noted) • One (1)vacancy for Inspector or Plans Examiner(unexpired term ending January 2015) • One (1) application received o Michael Lue, P.E. 4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (4 year term, unless otherwise noted) • One (1) vacancy for Local Manufacturing Representative (unexpired term ending January 2015) • Two (2) applications received o Mark Castlow o Mark Saint-Vincent 119 Committee Vacancies—BCC Appointees Page Two ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (Continued) • Two (2) vacancies for Member-at-Large • Nine (9) applications received o Kevin Barry o Aaron Bowles o Mark Castlow o John E. Dyer o Todd Howder o Nicholas Rains o Mark Saint-Vincent o Charles Wilson o Karl Zimmermann 5. ENTERPRISE ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (4 year term, unless otherwise noted) • One (1) vacancy for Member from the Community at Large (unexpired term ending January 2016) • One (1) application received o Chris Russell 120 1 • Z - 13 TO IL 1" Milli IVB, � u r'. �t� ull 1 yV �"�;�711 1111111" UIN, 71VIyu ;V ' s�. R �11 rr r y t v 1 r f i t r , F J 3 v I II� r V'Ir Y E N as. . ' � r n uAk M 8 i " u r 45, N S � q WN wr AV Al mw- NO x s c, aONCEPTUAL MO . r OPTION##1 �16-13 i Q T'll IN �\ \ ,\v mv VAM Mau TCRv k it Q 0CIOICATED BUSWAY s� CONC. CURB rF• �.r F h 14 \ f -s s d� J .; I"AP ^�eo \ z401 QfNO a., •.. v \ \ \�. arm ramiNG uxc \ \ i \\f u K w4 v F 10 mr + CL" >y -tr k \ k w z ` E IM Y I%WF All ok ` x m\ \yAW 1 61, f G` R8 k L :\ /ot O BCC AGENDA January 22, 2013 ITEM 14.1)(1) INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Reversal of Relief Canals FROM: Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Zorc is leading a summit on the Indian River Lagoon in March. As most of us are aware the Lagoon is damaged both by pollutants and sudden, .. unnatural surges of fresh water from the mainland into the Lagoon.I have long thought that the best solution for the health of the Lagoon would be to reverse in whole or part the waters from the three relief canals to storage areas to the west, most probably into lands within the Sebastian Improvement district. There would then be multiple benefits not just for the health of the Lagoon but for storm water storage and as an alternate water supply. At this time I could not say that the project is financially feasible but I believe it warrants some discussion. If there is consensus from the Board I would like to use some staff time in the next six weeks to develop the project to the point that there is enough of a plan to discuss and then, if the Board approves, to develop more fully. If consistent with the Lagoon Summits program and with Commissioner Zorc's permission, I would like to add it to the Agenda of the Lagoon Summit. Thank you. 121 January 22, 2013 ITEM 14.E.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 17, 2013 SUBJECT: Consideration for the use of the County's Administration Complex Parking Area FROM: Tim Zorc Commissioner, District 3 1 would like to request the Board to consider the use of the County Administration Complex parking areas as overflow for the Gospel Fest being held February 1-2, 2013 at the Vero Beach Municipal Airport. The event is coordinating transportation to and from various overflow parking areas. w.. 122