Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/08/2013AP $ 4 �1 X41 l _mss� € ' � � �•��� � itw . Al t db I I', r, �111�I - , j l y r Lagoon Greenway Three-mile trail system for hiking and bicycling through oak forests , over wetlands , and along the Indian River Lagoon . f D A/ SW M AV VJ ca Ms 66TH AV SW 66TH 4{ 66T H AV l5al 14 AV tt rsw 4. 0 AV! t 27TH Aid h T 17TH Al (� ,x IkAA INN WOW . M µ CSS "� RROVENI', HOA INC 12TH ST e,> FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGP.1f*N 015 Four P ro,p e rt i e s INDIAN RIVER COUNTY gTH ST ` R PARK ASSOC LTD PT.NR P 'Yids VISTA ROYALE GARDENS ASSOC INC m. j< y VISTA GOLF LLC i HEALTH CARE REIT IN( 4TH ST PuWr C ae<kA - MCK£EBOTANICALGARDENINC INDIAN RIVER FARM$DR DIST Greenway Trails '—— ������� - N I � w E Area ti4 t S Closed J ;r • Phase Two r p i • N.wg '_ 44� 1 8th St } Area Closed Lot --- Mini Adventure Trail Parking P _ A Trailhead Kiosk ----—• 2 Mile Loop Trait Picnic Site \ Forested Area �+ OLagoon View Wetlands *Boardwalk Main Main Trail lJ Public- Private Partnership Goal : to provide maximum effective service to the public through a partnership . Indian River County secure funding and permits, contract development and oversight, and assist in maintaining trail and facilities. Indian River Land Trust provides overall promotion , assist with funding , coordination and tracking of the project, work with volunteers . 2 v �l 2 PWI 70 etL + +e ,. t At �1 t g 7 �- R� µ ll vp any rts^• � r a3 w �Y r + _ +•- �YYgYYg��:'+>tR``.�6 Z .4 yes, - -.7 G `S � k c�' a E� 9 � ke nt +xiy' ''� {�.A t b ■� yri,'.. °`..� M >..T y�+ $' (Tax t�tlf� l`k�ix,3 �4iF ,'y� { � _ ��j�I iy. �y i � �• i L NOW l t s t, tE ✓i r y, try t G t ` ,y. ;S i5 k� F.ty i `,�a• j f Y * y n `I F _ A 5 Iry l S` NONE %.'<--.< e -. � ,• �, k><' :\ [ e i,�,y, e' } A� ` k.j�+� d �Fa'EE k3 14r '+ 7 i y ��66� .�, 'ryyt � k -S, i� �, Yom.• wwre'�"', `3s�tt�" yfS ism i{ QSAM� r�i�i +J fit I f .4 '1 Lagoon Greenway Primary Goals: 1 . Provide pathways for a variety of recreational opportunities - (walking , jogging , bicycling). 2 . Conserve the natural resources of the Lagoon . 3 . Establish educational facilities and programs about local natural and historic resources . Funding Partners Florida Inland Navigation District ( FIND) Phase One — Parking Area & Trailhead Phase Two — Boardwalks and Lagoon Observation Platform Florida Office of Greenways and Trails Phase Two - Boardwalks i.•�;�'0.t t \'u �`.. .,.0 r �I 0 �i11j.. lr�i�i�i� y� � � z ""���S�f�����1� �� � i i 1 I e,' & 7,;z • `'.4 3f rt { r r t '�� � �"• �y��� ��` ' � k'�' �Sys a t p t 71`.�qtr Y. %F i NMI i r nom+ y� x e � Y l5 S 4 Jj� .� ads ilk i`;•�. � 6wr� I � J e i A , f � IV` 1r}`Nr �2��-'�a; 5};•`� '' t� �.3, c ,.� 4'`"0 III AF, IN r 1= � -�.' ��'r�Y � 'w �• `a. �r+1S 4 � �i�� v.4`�� ` ��a$ r��Fy t�; i � t��i ,-.e �k s� _—_.__ _.... 4 L • - It 7.+^Y`a .,✓' � L �s r ° �i f � : n ti. `! Ci� �.�t} .?`>. ""��. +_r!^�t;.�+�k _` _. .,�, ..ani.,�', „��?• 4�?., dd _1 e,.�J��'A. _ .v�:�.�2l�` ��''�.�6 „^•,s `rY h.y' *moi � J�.Ra�`.. r {�` r T�•y Y �' � sod. • .:fie �.'�. 4+.. A -• s .,,�. �” ., t� CA '�G• ifi- K-: a yt f y♦ #jyTY' y� t, 1 t �♦•jig 1 '4 � ��>,• '^#� gt �¢RS3 .�y��/� {�• . �. '{'' `311 • � °R >� f� � y q Y egg ' ap ; � �c �n iL f TY x a- s, p4 x a py �� t t.� • w a 14 # m p ���.#� "4'�'► j=" ��r f�� i�'r * �+ �,�hd 4 _ •t rt k. ,�`�°x -9r �{� }` r a�`�• �.,j x1. »ar,.t i' t r �' ! r 4"Ye.M,, r'� �. ,..•} sf: ,' gTm ,ate , R6 a Ah 0 71 r PQTp £ '*"V i�y,.rr• `tu s gf .v, �r yf4'p!,.'r"+ r`. a I�� # f w o ,,.�4� Tft r e At 01— MIN "wo" ..,,�'^ `+fie' .A._ •4a.`�t �,:�,��� ��b''z' ,j� � �.. �.� .�3._ ,w4 t 9 `lj2A\^b�e •�Y � � o � 71 a� W! s -' f t d shy.. NOY '• .. ,�'j- � is e y �l��; � � d e fir; i ��. �_.� + flr � a• � � 5 a S� 4s + r.„� Y '. re �'� ��'1 p�� f `�. 1.f �ei'3.'• i F a.' }!'S,kk?'. SIX WINy�� t�t .IV } ,a : Sr+. ...;`fi t .c _:: "' ` ' ` �......_. �• .... ARM M OVER, NOW 4 fpy.Q lip yy} v + x Y Ab 4 ter.. .-r'4�y A?v � '�. �✓y1U:�l � � s�y,+,� , � �.,�� A y , M-+�—..a. �`[�♦ ,'�' f�_�� �."`' _ ,%.-f;_ 3 3 ;may �,�. Wpm,- � „tp {�.+�vPAu(�+ ~��'aF is m`h Q ••,��,j�✓- � 4 �:.. y rt lot r,x td f $ y S+ w.y A �7 3' '^f1 "•KF kNd i �d��a ".}, lV � � �'.• yt. , AMM AS V4, am qfy a t a! re , F t y I'd SAN Mot �Ik1 p7 F, S Ae Val Aga R�pV t �. :•-.• mss � �^ ,, ��_ ``may, �ti;� s r f" y �` � r _ s'� •'!P iM '+�' � ` `��'� pmt '{` t N d JI:•.Y t t .a'"��4 "*1'i = �P'� 1�.�' '�'r34 Y SK tm sr ��'Ria,•L= _Li ¢� � E+ �.�~ � d+1` +4 +44 +.; ti c✓ x.••�. - f k ?51. .'l'!"l -5,�.a��res-� �"a�ry r•'` y,� .ea= ,fila e° c`` _ � � �r'. nw y R n 21 ✓AS„ i,• SRI �W �r R � } Alma ANA Wop t 5 OY;1 1 - i t r i ^c 1 NSA mmi �r ���� �y� r� 'i ��. � �# 'Sid ��i i �� �•� �'. �"' �� W A Ex, 1 K i �� { � tistnrIVA .- 1 ,.yrt i ,...<t .m �_ ::��sf�Yail•-'fit :... _ -.. na.. // �+, ♦ : <.rr�;::_, � r a?t:.; �P-''i t � �, '$`sa'�s a„”[ ;i�� i a �� � � �� } c,`t �`..." .�ed`� ''d .. - � _. . * t r �{. ^a �;,, 7 �.. ��„:; � �*t A� i•'t 'r�i 4q �:: .'� �"'°° "�.� '�c..�ao9�'� � h': ,� ��..,� ,;-. v ,a AA �,« p id AW j ff it jIt * 41 JR � x/ tali ,i��$s•�'S „� W�� , 4��fj t 1 e w nw �y1r �r kt r (H,"•�';d t w Aid t f � i iw i! °•t}r t� - ;2 �.r �"�t..Tt,rte �E,, h 1 , � t� .�}� y Kb_ �• 1^ ..r a+'r "rtwt1 y3 ! c � off IF w3,:.:ur ^�' fid[+ tt .✓ 'x h.' °� r VA tea, {.y x �? ,_thy:. ��`. ..�•+!"'"" „�" �y, ,� ,�• y '.� i <. ey ,` An �1� +�+, �� M $ �- � �r� A t «'_ �r 3"f'Ohl �'kN ,B" y, �"` .,X 5'e M *5, �1 �/ y '"£yb 'M�n4 s$`. 41 Y x a +�':�* � �,r�,�t� �.. .� r,',� s�' `wry° "Y Mail i`'�z A• R,: �,� �. ��*'G C"�e r`� : f�'r of� " "°' ..r. ,�!� ' Of, Nv 9 f8 p W. y 1p ^y`�: '�,r �# .. �@ � � 4,� X31"•� �* ,y. r'" "su ,,�•- +' oil d Mal An .1Y * # 0�, �� t, qq� AL 4n 1 a as ...�. v 10 y P a� "x"44 . . #" "h"'' Y i, ::. ,r„$�p 3�+' 1g1'„s ,sr �''a �a �.'a�y,•s,'" � ��t'r� �3' i 1 AV J,j i' d �. .4' �✓ V�" Vit„ �.' ���i S� t 3 0 ri c .d Y . y rs� al��`�. x .r"'��`.+ y �> 'S'} � uh' S �'�': _.:.y �+� It �Y-.�. i �.•." �• �� x` a:y�, xiS•�t-�� 4 �- -,'. ..,�k-I° "r„i,� � `" � d �i i th���r�,r`SS'..r..♦7,pyq�"� �,�, t< � r , { k ��.r � �,;-� r yk"{r r.4i E � ��,A1+F� s rr'�� t n .�g ' ae� ♦.'+� � � } �� 3 ..d 'off,. s.' g E i _ i'�ei ! 77, _ i�„� ����� ��>,��T(. ��w r k i k,`' '2 'FYS,�'Lit ,y�'3`�^�# �i A n 2" Y� i'pq�,g'��•4 1'. t � � �'. a. '. t�1 a'�'% ��,,'�"9[� is s �v r,rr7�'' �'. t. �rr✓w l'� s'��`s'` �,s � ? P;��, a S' °+' � ��it L;ts M¢� ����r t .' e s "�� � � �j�•+ �� !Nli��• „'�' i2ys:rH ��- � -. x -'�` s,tt#k• ���, �t ,� � 9 .�,,., s,, "�ttr� t f ���+ty �±$ ,�3,3.<,� �/� � ',����6' �`t<''>i�+a'��E,� V 41 r r rptr ,'+t'Y b« VtA"'.�. �! ���',,�; v�iW��, ` i 4'�3~ *a a� { a ,�.�,,.�r w,"�,�fi"�� '� � r,rm=".` �✓ � e t Tie t mg e�. �t z Y' t!' ����'t a y� J 1� R -� �rFf #" .w r ke t , •• ( � t ; �$ !�•, .� 4 Rum ti_ ,�A \ � F m t 6' i y i aW':'.. , n r ? Ribbon Cutting Friday, January 11t" — 10 : 00 a . m . i r �:nn ��w Wit, _.• 3,� �� � '�;� iii ��� '�i F 1 - LTi-ix{h�7A�4?�l ;4'k 1l d G SL 4'�t . iY�� f) �.' "u(n�cap�Yrrm ru�euy3iuffl - y, f , E { $ a' t � 1 .:�, �•; z' ` iia" € � = : .a mss, ilpo y, s k� 1Are p@ Q �1 RS-6 323022000005M000034,0 -45TH i?vfA'.R TIN R KING 6L v -------------- -44 A II a2392700009004000002.0 RS-6 I GI 05 Sol 'T IM, tomull, IL « x Y •r CD IBM? A Y� .••. o y ,' PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING FEBRUARY 21, 2013 AS HARLEM AMBASSADORS BASKETBALL GAME AND SHOW NIGHT AT SEBASTIAN RIVER HIGH SCHOOL WHEREAS, 1,713 persons were treated for mental illness at the Behavioral Health Center in Indian River County in 2011; and WHEREAS, the National Alliance on Mental Illness in Indian River County is dedicated to improving the lives of those suffering from mental illness and their families; and WHEREAS, the Florida Comets AAU Youth Basketball Organization is dedicated to empowering local area youth with the discipline and skills needed to be college level basketball players and successful students; and WHEREAS, NAMI in Indian River County and the Florida Comets AAU Youth Basketball Organization, both 501-c-3 non-profit organizations, are joining together to host the Harlem Ambassadors Basketball Game and Show at Sebastian River High School Gymnasium on Thursday, February 21, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. to raise needed funds to help mentally ill and youth basketball; and WHEREAS, the internationally-acclaimed Harlem Ambassadors offer a unique brand exhibition basketball featuring high-flying slam dunks, dazzling ball-handling tricks and hilarious comedy routines, and have helped to raise millions of dollars for local charities; and WHEREAS, the local Florida Comets All-Stars will play the Harlem Ambassadors in an "exciting and entertaining basketball game on February 21, 2013 at the Sebastian River High School Gym. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that February 21, 2013 is hereby designated as Harlem Ambassadors Night in Indian River County, Florida and the Board wishes for a successful event. Adopted this 8th day of January, 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLO IDA _R x-. Chairman } � seLIE. Flescher, Wesley S. Davis, Vibe Chairman LOR f . Bosh Solari Peter D. O'Br an Tim `r ��00 4� . G JEFFREY R. SMITH � Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller 1 801 2 7TH Street �ZORT04' Vero Beach, Florida 32961 -1028 Telephone (772) 226-1945 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 13, 2012 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS December 7, 2012 to December 13, 2012 FROM: DIANE BERNARDO - FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of December 7, 2012 to December 13, 2012. Attachment: DB: MS 2 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 292619 12/13/2012 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 935.57 292620 12/13/2012 DAVES COMMUNICATIONS/ELECTRONIC 20.00 292621 12/13/2012 FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL ALLISON 691.03 292622 12/13/2012 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST LLC 389.42 292623 12/13/2012 JORDAN MOWER INC 1,151.50 292624 12/13/2012 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 280.14 292625 12/13/2012 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC 397.15 292626 12/13/2012 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 135.20 292627 12/13/2012 COPYCO INC DBA 338.08 292628 12/13/2012 TESCO SOUTH INCORPORATED 287.85 292629 12/13/2012 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 49.29 292630 12/13/2012 AT&T WIRELESS 536.44 292631 12/13/2012 PARALEE COMPANY INC 374.00 292632 12/13/2012 KELLY TRACTOR CO 733.62 292633 12/13/2012 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER INC 49.30 292634 12/13/2012 DAILY COURIER SERVICE 1,497.00 292635 12/13/2012 INDIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER 525.88 292636 12/13/2012 HACH CO 766.17 292637 12/13/2012 SLP INVESTMENTS INC 143.90 292638 12/13/2012 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC 1,710.00 292639 12/13/2012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS,LTD 9,485.55 292640 12/13/2012 BOUND TREE MEDICAL 317.80 292641 12/13/2012 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 301.48 292642 12/13/2012 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 95.00 292643 12/13/2012 JOHN C HINTON 658.00 292644 12/13/2012 XEROX CORP SUPPLIES 1,876.50 292645 12/13/2012 GENERAL PART INC 1,529.35 292646 12/13/2012 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 49.00 292647 12/13/2012 SIGNS IN A DAY 150.00 292648 12/13/2012 BAKER&TAYLOR INC 4,096.35 292649 12/13/2012 GROVE WELDERS INC 175.00 292650 12/13/2012 BRANDTS APPLIANCE SERVICE INC 206.11 292651 12/13/2012 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 570.72 292652 12/13/2012 LOWES CO INC 1,170.59 292653 12/13/2012 MICROMARKETING LLC 25.60 292654 12/13/2012 WIGINTON CORP 123.00 292655 12/13/2012 PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC 397.62 292656 12/13/2012 GO COASTAL INC 358.00 292657 12/13/2012 SUNSHINE SAFETY COUNCIL INC 350.00 292658 12/13/2012 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 151.12 292659 12/13/2012 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 5,511.75 292660 12/13/2012 CITY OF VERO BEACH 150,148.38 292661 12/13/2012 CITY OF VERO BEACH 202.75 292662 12/13/2012 LSQ FUNDING GROUP L C 1,510.72 292663 12/13/2012 INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC 1,630.04 292664 12/13/2012 L B BRYAN&COMPANY 78.00 292665 12/13/2012 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 190.00 292666 12/13/2012 B/C B/S OF FL ADM FEE 213.28 292667 12/13/2012 B/C B/S OF FL ADM FEE 9,704.24 292668 12/13/2012 B/C B/S OF FL ADM FEE 35,617.76 292669 12/13/2012 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 1,974.38 292670 12/13/2012 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 85.90 292671 12/13/2012 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 43.85 292672 12/13/2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIES 21,776.29 292673 12/13/2012 ACUSHNET COMPANY 63.01 292674 12/13/2012 FEDERAL EXPRESS 10.82 292675 12/13/2012 FEDERAL EXPRESS 251.79 292676 12/13/2012 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 93.37 1 3 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 292677 12/13/2012 PERKINS INDIAN RIVER PHARMACY 378.65 292678 12/13/2012 TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC 274,630.38 292679 12/13/2012 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 72.41 292680 12/13/2012 FLORIDA BUREAU OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SRV 1,850.00 292681 12/13/2012 SUBSTANCE AWARENESS COUNCIL OF IRC INC 37,297.74 292682 12/13/2012 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 39,994.22 292683 12/13/2012 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 1,968.24 292684 12/13/2012 ACUSHNET COMPANY 966.12 292685 12/13/2012 BLUE CROSS&BLUE SHIELD of FLORIDA 1,600.12 292686 12/13/2012 TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC 3,030.68 292687 12/13/2012 CITY OF FELLSMERE 91.56 292688 12/13/2012 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC COOP INC 337.00 292689 12/13/2012 KENNY CAMPBELL SENIOR 120.00 292690 12/13/2012 US KIDS GOLF LLC 784.78 292691 12/13/2012 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 55.00 292692 12/13/2012 TOCOMA RUBBER STAMP&MARKING SYSTEM 174.00 292693 12/13/2012 FLORIDA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 300.00 292694 12/13/2012 TREASURE COAST FIRE CHIEFS 175.00 292695 12/13/2012 GERALD A YOUNG SR 90.00 292696 12/13/2012 PITNEY BOWES INC 165.00 292697 12/13/2012 ALAN C KAUFFMANN 40.00 292698 12/13/2012 WESTSIDE REPROGRAPHICS OF VERO BEACH INC 20.00 292699 12/13/2012 CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FL 1,000.00 292700 12/13/2012 ADVANCED XEROGRAPHICS IMAGING 14,000.00 292701 12/13/2012 VORTECH PHARMACEUTICALS LTD 339.04 292702 12/13/2012 TIM GEIB 60.00 292703 12/13/2012 ALLEGIANCE INC 500.00 292704 12/13/2012 DONADIO AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 20,761.01 292705 12/13/2012 C&C ELECTRIC WORKS INC 10,622.00 292706 12/13/2012 HOMETOWN NEWS 99.00 292707 12/13/2012 FLGOLF INC 1,157.00 �+.. 292708 12/13/2012 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 524.00 292709 12/13/2012 CAMERON CORPORATION 37.14 292710 12/13/2012 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 1,487.14 292711 12/13/2012 POTTERS INDUSTRIES LLC 2,760.00 292712 12/13/2012 SAVE THE MOMENT 63.00 292713 12/13/2012 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 1,560.44 292714 12/13/2012 CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 331.96 292715 12/13/2012 VAN WAL INC 200.00 292716 12/13/2012 BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS 1,250.00 292717 12/13/2012 GARY C WHEELER 31.78 292718 12/13/2012 RANDOM HOUSE INC 22.50 292719 12/13/2012 ALAN HILL 504.75 292720 12/13/2012 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO 32,450.00 292721 12/13/2012 PAK MAIL CENTER 84.06 292722 12/13/2012 OLIVER'S PLUMBING INC 367.50 292723 12/13/2012 MASTELLER&MOLER INC 1,800.00 292724 12/13/2012 JOHN E THIMMER 284.23 292725 12/13/2012 DAVID SILON 255.00 292726 12/13/2012 GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 26,051.60 292727 12/13/2012 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPE 999.60 292728 12/13/2012 DAYSPRING 250.00 292729 12/13/2012 1ST FIRE&SECURITY INC 280.00 292730 12/13/2012 KELLY J TURNER JR 60.00 292731 12/13/2012 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 1,020.33 292732 12/13/2012 KENNY CAMPBELL JR 100.00 292733 12/13/2012 FLORIDA ASSOC OF HUMAN SRV ADMIN 90.00 292734 12/13/2012 COMMUNICATIONS BROKERS&CONSULTANTS INC 5.20 292735 12/13/2012 UNDERSEA SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC 231.44 292736 12/13/2012 AIRVAC INC 2,200.16 2 4 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 292737 12/13/2012 MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS INC 21,300.00 292738 12/13/2012 CHARLES A WALKER 60.00 292739 12/13/2012 ASSOCIATION OF STATE FLOODPLAIN MANAGERS 110.00 292740 12/13/2012 CEMEX 205.18 292741 12/13/2012 REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC 2,158.18 292742 12/13/2012 LUCILENE SANTOS 210.00 292743 12/13/2012 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 1,111.49 292744 12/13/2012 MARIA I SAVOIE 281.26 292745 12/13/2012 ALLIANCE BUS GROUP INC 1,349.78 292746 12/13/2012 HLP,INC. 4,080.00 292747 12/13/2012 EMERSON NETWORK POWER 14,350.00 292748 12/13/2012 STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE 675.00 292749 12/13/2012 STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE 7,452.54 292750 12/13/2012 STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE OPT 9,921.10 292751 12/13/2012 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 850.00 292752 12/13/2012 CUSTOM PRODUCTS CORPORATION 3,123.00 292753 12/13/2012 DAVID L HANCOCK 651.00 292754 12/13/2012 SOUTHEAST POWER SYSTEMS OF ORLANDO 552.59 292755 12/13/2012 BRENNTAG MID-SOUTH INC 1,018.16 292756 12/13/2012 STAT MEDICAL DISPOSAL INC 580.00 292757 12/13/2012 MELVIN BUSH CONSTRUCTION INC 14,721.30 292758 12/13/2012 ALWAYS ON TIME ENTERPRISES INC 1,029.26 292759 12/13/2012 CORPORATE CARE WORKS 6.60 292760 12/13/2012 CORPORATE CARE WORKS 300.30 292761 12/13/2012 CORPORATE CARE WORKS 1,102.20 292762 12/13/2012 TAMPA BAY LIBRARY CONSORTIUM 600.00 292763 12/13/2012 COOPER CROUSE-HINDS MTL INC 848.78 292764 12/13/2012 WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC 53.50 292765 12/13/2012 KEMPER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 10.56 292766 12/13/2012 GUETTLER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC 295,407.90 292767 12/13/2012 BOULEVARD TIRE CENTER 6,023.91 •- 292768 12/13/2012 WHITE DIRECTORY PUBLISHERS DIV OF HEARST CON 122.00 292769 12/13/2012 MURPHY&WALKER P L 11,885.45 292770 12/13/2012 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 675.00 292771 12/13/2012 ROYALTY AIR LLC 8,400.00 292772 12/13/2012 PEGGY CARDELL&ASSOCIATES 630.00 292773 12/13/2012 CCH INC 1,800.00 292774 12/13/2012 PLANB BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 30.00 292775 12/13/2012 PLEASANTON GREENHILL MEEK&ASSOC 525.15 292776 12/13/2012 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 550.00 292777 12/13/2012 A/R/C ASSOCIATES INC 1,757.00 292778 12/13/2012 ELAINE KANE 90.00 292779 12/13/2012 TOTAL ID SOLUTIONS INC 223.00 292780 12/13/2012 MANCILS TRACTOR SERVICE INC 65,871.90 292781 12/13/2012 TECHNICAL ELECTRIC SYSTEMS INC 8,876.11 292782 12/13/2012 COMANCO ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION 501,146.26 292783 12/13/2012 MELINDA LOW PAMPALLONA 60.00 292784 12/13/2012 SEMS TECHNOLOGIES LLC 18,000.00 292785 12/13/2012 WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC 17,498.07 292786 12/13/2012 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 40.00 292787 12/13/2012 YP LLC 159.00 292788 12/13/2012 RELIABLE REPORTING INC 321.50 292789 12/13/2012 WILLIAM EDWARD BROWN JR 775.00 292790 12/13/2012 BETHANY BURT 180.00 292791 12/13/2012 HIGHMARK STOP LOSS 77.68 292792 12/13/2012 HIGHMARK STOP LOSS 3,534.44 292793 12/13/2012 HIGHMARK STOP LOSS 12,972.56 292794 12/13/2012 JDA SYSTEMS 3,470.00 ,%NW 292795 12/13/2012 FORD GOLF AND SPECIALTIES LLC 1,251.87 292796 12/13/2012 LEE DINENBERG 30.00 3 5 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 292797 12/13/2012 ODYSSEY II DP V LLC 9,765.21 292798 12/13/2012 LINDA GRAHAM 90.00 292799 12/13/2012 PAMARNONE 30.00 292800 12/13/2012 TIM ZORC 219.07 292801 12/13/2012 PARWANI LAW PA 750.00 292802 12/13/2012 JOHN C HAUSMAN JR 2,447.39 292803 12/13/2012 CHARLES LEATZOW 26.15 292804 12/13/2012 PHILIP TYSKEWICZ 330.00 292805 12/13/2012 MEGAN NOLTE 32.21 292806 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 67.74 292807 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 106.99 292808 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 72.67 292809 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 57.49 292810 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 108.92 292811 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 209.70 292812 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 73.58 292813 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.68 292814 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 36.94 292815 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 25.38 292816 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 171.09 292817 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 62.86 292818 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 24.29 292819 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 11.69 292820 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 67.09 292821 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 40.41 292822 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 44.76 292823 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 73.99 292824 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 26.20 292825 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 126.12 292826 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 31.27 292827 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 12.01 292828 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 11.22 292829 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 73.58 292830 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 68.22 292831 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 44.49 292832 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 41.80 292833 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 6.03 292834 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 70.75 292835 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 38.07 292836 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 9.40 292837 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 11.66 292838 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 17.36 292839 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 68.22 292840 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 43.10 292841 12/13/2012 UT ERFUNDS 73.58 292842 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.28 292843 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 68.22 292844 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 40.41 292845 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 140.53 292846 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 122.46 292847 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 33.41 292848 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 36.44 292849 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 36.94 292850 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 9.29 292851 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 40.41 292852 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 51.90 292853 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 36.94 292854 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 23.16 292855 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 58.84 292856 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 51.90 4 6 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 292857 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 16.63 292858 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 43.53 292859 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 16.82 292860 12/13/2012 UT REFUNDS 40.41 Grand Total: 1,817,924.92 5 7 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS.NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1000478 12/7/2012 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 150.80 1000479 12/7/2012 SSES INC DBA 1,456.50 1000480 12/10/201: SSES INC DBA 391.07 1000481 12/10/201, INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 73.75 1000482 12/10/201: REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 432.57 1000483 12/10/201: APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 39.60 1000484 12/10/201: MEEKS PLUMBING INC 682.40 1000485 12/10/201: ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 373.89 1000486 12/10/201: SVI SYSTEMS INC 168.75 1000487 12/10/201, RELIABLE POLY JOHN 91.01 1000488 12/10/201: APPLE MACHINE&SUPPLY CO 248.78 1000489 12/10/201: FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 350.00 1000490 12/10/201: RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 2,529.88 1000491 12/10/201, AUTO PARTNERS LLC 144.34 1000492 12/10/201: L&L DISTRIBUTORS 16.00 1000493 12/10/201: S&S AUTO PARTS 163.38 1000495 12/11/201: PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 40.00 1000496 12/11/201: COLKITT SHEET METAL&A/C INC 333.00 1000497 12/11/201: REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 42.92 1000498 12/11/201: SMITH BROTHERS CONTRACTING EQUIP 209.88 1000499 12/11/201: ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 38.88 1000500 12/11/201: COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 442.68 1000501 12/11/201: RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 217.40 1000502 12/11/201: COMPLETE CLEANING SERVICE 1,526.25 1000503 12/11/201: SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 1,340.44 1000504 12/11/201: CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 164.85 1000505 12/11/201: AUTO PARTNERS LLC 492.48 1000506 12/11/201: AT&T 1,848.40 1000507 12/11/201: WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 165.51 *vow 1000508 12/12/201: INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 158.90 1000509 12/12/201: INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 2,127.45 1000510 12/12/201: REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 230.76 1000511 12/12/201: THE GALE GROUP 278.14 1000512 12/12/201, MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 50.00 1000513 12/12/201, ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 349.52 1000514 12/12/201: DEERE&COMPANY 396.91 1000515 12/12/201: FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 3,879.41 1000516 12/12/201: DYNAMIC BRANDS LLC 695.00 1000517 12/12/201: BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC 418.50 1000518 12/12/201: CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 628.50 1000519 12/12/201, S&S AUTO PARTS 78.94 1000520 12/13/201: SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 40.26 1000521 12/13/201: LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC 164.00 1000522 12/13/201: REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 72.89 1000523 12/13/201: MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 50.00 1000524 12/13/201: HILL MANUFACTURING CO INC 1,546.00 1000525 12/13/201: ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 257.38 1000526 12/13/201: COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 549.36 1000527 12/13/201: SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 90.60 1000528 12/13/201: COMPUTEE INTERNET HOSTING INC 2,500.00 1000529 12/13/201: L&L DISTRIBUTORS 22.37 1000530 12/13/201: S&S AUTO PARTS 20.40 1000531 12/13/201: AT&T 15,677.39 1000532 12/13/201: OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 433.85 Grand Total: 44,891.94 1 8 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 2193 12/7/2012 KIMLEY HORN&ASSOC INC 6,237.25 2194 12/7/2012 CDM SMITH INC 322.50 2195 12/7/2012 ICMA RET CORP 1,585.00 2196 12/7/2012 NACO/SOUTHEAST 21,548.08 2197 12/7/2012 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION 12,465.30 2198 12/7/2012 SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION 258,595.59 2199 12/7/2012 IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 14,465.40 2200 12/7/2012 FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES,INC 5,590.13 2201 12/7/2012 VEROTOWN LLC 2,334.00 2202 12/7/2012 VEROTOWN LLC 59,714.80 2203 12/7/2012 NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT 145.83 2204 12/7/2012 FL SDU 7,603.13 2205 12/10/201, IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 370,577.76 2206 12/11/201 IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 73.57 2207 12/11/201: I R C HEALTH INSURANCE-TRUST 451,064.98 2208 12/13/201: BANK OF AMERICA 18,869.57 Grand Total: 1,231,192.89 1 g SB .JEFFREY R. SMITH � Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller 1 801 27TH Street �LpRipA Vero Beach, Florida 32961 -1 028 Telephone (772) 226-1945 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 20, 2012 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS December 14, 2012 to December 20, 2012 FROM: DIANE BERNARDO - FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of December 14, 2012 to December 20, 2012. Attachment: DB: MS 10 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 292861 12/17/2012 AT&T WIRELESS 319.61 292862 12/19/2012 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 142.32 292863 12/19/2012 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 50.00 292864 12/19/2012 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 277.30 292865 12/19/2012 IRC FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC 6,120.00 292866 12/19/2012 UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1,112.88 292867 12/19/2012 MISDU MICHIGAN STATE 445.75 292868 12/19/2012 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 208.30 292869 12/19/2012 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 211.12 292870 12/19/2012 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 117.80 292871 12/19/2012 ECMC 138.15 292872 12/20/2012 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 642.95 292873 12/20/2012 STURGIS LUMBER&PLYWOOD CO 72.65 292874 12/20/2012 FLORIDA DETROIT DIESEL ALLISON 1,943.68 292875 12/20/2012 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST LLC 69.64 292876 12/20/2012 JORDAN MOWER INC 1,149.74 292877 12/20/2012 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 1,093.25 292878 12/20/2012 TEN-8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 8,377.35 292879 12/20/2012 COPYCO INC DBA 106.70 292880 12/20/2012 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 299.18 292881 12/20/2012 VELDE FORD INC 23.10 292882 12/20/2012 RUSSELL CONCRETE INC 487.50 292883 12/20/2012 AT&T WIRELESS 103.60 292884 12/20/2012 E-Z BREW COFFEE&BOTTLE WATER SVC 80.94 292885 12/20/2012 KELLY TRACTOR CO 643.26 292886 12/20/2012 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 293.75 292887 12/20/2012 VERO LAWNMOWER CENTER INC 217.87 292888 12/20/2012 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 2,858.99 292889 12/20/2012 HACH CO 952.00 292890 12/20/2012 RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICE 7,850.00 292891 12/20/2012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD 995.09 292892 12/20/2012 BOUND TREE MEDICAL 1,827.77 292893 12/20/2012 EGP INC 205.02 292894 12/20/2012 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 439.67 292895 12/20/2012 FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE 1,062.36 292896 12/20/2012 CARTER ASSOCIATES INC 232.09 292897 12/20/2012 HOMELAND IRRIGATION 207.29 292898 12/20/2012 DELL MARKETING LP 1,142.00 292899 12/20/2012 GENERAL PART INC 1,167.34 292900 12/20/2012 BAKER&TAYLOR INC 2,200.42 292901 12/20/2012 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 969.47 292902 12/20/2012 LOWES CO INC 1,315.23 292903 12/20/2012 VERO COLLISION CENTER 1,885.13 292904 12/20/2012 PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC 1,229.32 292905 12/20/2012 SUNSHINE REHABILATION CENTER OF IRC INC 105.00 292906 12/20/2012 PER-SE TECHNOLOGIES INC 26,964.37 292907 12/20/2012 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 410.00 292908 12/20/2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 25.00 292909 12/20/2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 5,657.00 292910 12/20/2012 CITY OF VERO BEACH 7,544.95 292911 12/20/2012 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS &MORE INC 140.46 292912 12/20/2012 LSQ FUNDING GROUP L C 917.98 292913 12/20/2012 INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC 403.93 292914 12/20/2012 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 7.75 292915 12/20/2012 PETTY CASH 12.30 292916 12/20/2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 3,432.59 �... 292917 12/20/2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 78,306.00 292918 12/20/2012 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 2,492.49 1 11 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 292919 12/20/2012 HUMANE SOCIETY 25,875.00 292920 12/20/2012 FLORIDA ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOC INC 70.00 292921 12/20/2012 TOTAL TRUCK PARTS INC 499.96 292922 12/20/2012 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE INC 1,320.00 292923 12/20/2012 AQUAGENIX 372.00 292924 12/20/2012 EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE 1,840.67 292925 12/20/2012 DUMONT COMPANY INC 1,498.25 292926 12/20/2012 INDIAN RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC 2,585.44 292927 12/20/2012 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 31,245.12 292928 12/20/2012 WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 97.00 292929 12/20/2012 FEDERAL EXPRESS 158.07 292930 12/20/2012 FEDERAL EXPRESS 274.20 292931 12/20/2012 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 2,840.63 292932 12/20/2012 CITY OF SEBASTIAN 17,995.39 292933 12/20/2012 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 252.00 292934 12/20/2012 VERO HERITAGE INC 652.10 292935 12/20/2012 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 84.28 292936 12/20/2012 SUBSTANCE AWARENESS COUNCIL OF IRC INC 1,840.00 292937 12/20/2012 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 56,836.36 292938 12/20/2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 129.10 292939 12/20/2012 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE 173.66 292940 12/20/2012 KENNETH SCOTT ELLIS 16.02 292941 12/20/2012 PUBLIC DEFENDER 11,661.61 292942 12/20/2012 PHILLIP J MATSON 128.31 292943 12/20/2012 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER INC 14,566.80 292944 12/20/2012 GAIL E FLINN 347.00 292945 12/20/2012 STATE ATTORNEY 3,782.37 292946 12/20/2012 CITY OF FELLSMERE 16.10 292947 12/20/2012 NSI ALPHA CORPORATION 390.00 292948 12/20/2012 NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE COAST 22,812.83 292949 12/20/2012 KENNY CAMPBELL SENIOR 40.00 292950 12/20/2012 PUBLIC RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 385.00 292951 12/20/2012 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC 180.84 292952 12/20/2012 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 20,500.00 292953 12/20/2012 CENTRAL FLORIDA PRIMA 35.00 292954 12/20/2012 BOATC MEMBERSHIP 220.00 292955 12/20/2012 MIZUNO USA INC 246.60 292956 12/20/2012 TREASURE COAST MARINE OF VERO INC 2,159.00 292957 12/20/2012 DAVID HAYS PE 110.00 292958 12/20/2012 WESTSIDE REPROGRAPHICS OF VERO BEACH INC 29.76 292959 12/20/2012 ADVANCED XEROGRAPHICS IMAGING 1,307.01 292960 12/20/2012 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC 225.00 292961 12/20/2012 DONADIO AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 150.00 292962 12/20/2012 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 333.00 292963 12/20/2012 WILLIAM K DEBRAAL 145.13 292964 12/20/2012 DAVID SPARKS 242.00 292965 12/20/2012 CRAIG MERRILL 403.00 292966 12/20/2012 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO 126.00 292967 12/20/2012 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 854.91 292968 12/20/2012 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 784.23 292969 12/20/2012 DOWN UNDER TANK TESTING OF AMERICA 644.87 292970 12/20/2012 VAN WAL INC 661.00 292971 12/20/2012 SYNAGRO-WWT INC 49,696.93 292972 12/20/2012 FASTENAL COMPANY 33.78 292973 12/20/2012 PARGAS 785.00 292974 12/20/2012 OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER 376.05 292975 12/20/2012 MBV ENGINEERING INC 546.25 292976 12/20/2012 MICHAEL ZITO 31.91 v... 292977 12/20/2012 EXCAL VISUAL LLP 768.50 292978 12/20/2012 GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 79,866.41 2 12 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 292979 12/20/2012 STANLEY CONSULTANTS INC 9,382.03 292980 12/20/2012 1 ST FIRE&SECURITY INC 195.00 292981 12/20/2012 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 342.66 292982 12/20/2012 PETER OBRYAN 15.59 292983 12/20/2012 PAK MAIL 25.70 292984 12/20/2012 JAMES M REID 42.84 292985 12/20/2012 ARJUNA WERAGODA 29.00 292986 12/20/2012 YELLOW BOOK SALES&DIST CO INC 219.00 292987 12/20/2012 L I TREE SERVICE 325.00 292988 12/20/2012 ROBERT L AND MARY S SLEZAK 98.90 292989 12/20/2012 FEDERAL LICENSING INC 119.00 292990 12/20/2012 BRIAN FREEMAN 135.39 292991 12/20/2012 WARREN&PAULA WROBLESKI JR 40.30 292992 12/20/2012 TERRI COLLINS LISTER 15.59 292993 12/20/2012 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 218.84 292994 12/20/2012 RENAE CHANDLER 60.00 292995 12/20/2012 ALLIANCE BUS GROUP INC 686.45 292996 12/20/2012 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 1,460.00 292997 12/20/2012 SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY 5,756.00 292998 12/20/2012 ADETAYO ADELAKUN 26.84 292999 12/20/2012 ROBERTA BARKER 39.60 293000 12/20/2012 KNAPHEIDE TRUCK EQUIPMENT SOUTHEAST 180.81 293001 12/20/2012 VICKY L STANLEY 72.00 293002 12/20/2012 ALAN S POLACKWICH SR 231.75 293003 12/20/2012 BRENNTAG MID-SOUTH INC 12,456.30 293004 12/20/2012 ALMM LLC 600.00 293005 12/20/2012 INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC 105,308.00 293006 12/20/2012 WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC 66.50 293007 12/20/2012 ALL AMERICAN PUBLISHING LC 329.00 293008 12/20/2012 MDT PERSONNEL LLC 6,318.72 293009 12/20/2012 ATLANTIC COASTAL LAND TITLE CO LLC 75.00 293010 12/20/2012 NEILL REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC 577.50 293011 12/20/2012 JANCY PET BURIAL SERVICE INC 89.25 293012 12/20/2012 SAFETY SCHELL CORPORATION 109.29 293013 12/20/2012 DELRAY MOTORS 150.67 293014 12/20/2012 AG SCAPE SERVICES INC 3,819.46 293015 12/20/2012 DEPT OF HWY SAFETY&MOTOR VEHICLES 10.00 293016 12/20/2012 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS 22.00 293017 12/20/2012 FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC 4,233.63 293018 12/20/2012 TAP PUBLISHING COMPANY 651.49 293019 12/20/2012 MONICAA SCHWARZ 180.00 293020 12/20/2012 AM CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC 80,200.93 293021 12/20/2012 SOLOMON BERTON 125.00 293022 12/20/2012 CHASE MEADOWS POA 338.00 293023 12/20/2012 M&T CROWE INC 360.00 293024 12/20/2012 AYERS INC 50.00 293025 12/20/2012 ALAN JAY FORD LINCOLN MERCURY INC 55,060.00 293026 12/20/2012 HONEYWELL ANALYTICS 575.00 293027 12/20/2012 A+FENCE OF THE TREASURE COAST 23,475.00 293028 12/20/2012 EDUCATIONAL MEDIA AGENCY 9,911.00 293029 12/20/2012 HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF NEW BRITAIN 837.95 293030 12/20/2012 ALLRITE SEPTIC& SERVICE INC 150.00 293031 12/20/2012 HAZEL ORGAN 40.40 293032 12/20/2012 THOMAS&LORI LOGAN JR 6.39 293033 12/20/2012 THOMAS KLIETZ 15.07 293034 12/20/2012 NANCY REID 42.85 293035 12/20/2012 CAROL M AMMIRATO 42.84 293036 12/20/2012 KENNETH REID 42.84 `... 293037 12/20/2012 JEREMIAH J SAUNDERS 213.46 293038 12/20/2012 JULIA DEWITT 10.02 3 13 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293039 12/20/2012 B&V PRESSURE CLEANING 320.72 293040 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 46.30 293041 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 91.86 293042 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 138.28 293043 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 77.57 293044 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 214.68 293045 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 107.49 293046 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 136.68 293047 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.28 293048 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 29.00 293049 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 115.89 293050 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 141.80 293051 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 96.69 293052 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 26.34 293053 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 40.41 293054 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 47.16 293055 12/20/2012 UT REFUND 73.58 293056 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 33.96 293057 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 23.23 293058 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 62.86 293059 12/20/2012 UT REFUND 40.41 293060 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 16.40 293061 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 40.41 293062 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 41.10 293063 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 21.06 293064 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 18.80 293065 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 30.82 293066 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 12.04 293067 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 11.00 293068 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 33.57 293069 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 16.35 '•+� 293070 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 29.04 293071 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 35.22 293072 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 1.71 293073 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 38.07 293074 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 61.78 293075 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 55.36 293076 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 23.16 293077 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 71.76 293078 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 46.30 293079 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 21.48 293080 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 65.49 293081 12/20/2012 UT REFNDS 11.92 293082 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 73.58 293083 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 6822 293084 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 62.86 293085 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.68 293086 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 7.97 293087 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 21.63 293088 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 8.52 293089 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 6822 293090 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 38.07 293091 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 4.57 293092 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 8.41 293093 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 33.41 293094 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 57.49 293095 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 62.86 293096 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 6822 293097 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 33.41 293098 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 67.09 4 14 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293099 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 4.48 293100 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 6.49 293101 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 13.04 293102 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 40.41 293103 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 57.49 293104 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 38.07 293105 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 44.14 293106 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 57.49 293107 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 62.86 293108 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 157.79 293109 12/20/2012 UT REFUND 41.32 293110 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 3.56 293111 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 26.33 293112 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 21.27 293113 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 38.07 293114 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 48.22 293115 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 67.09 293116 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 30.82 293117 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 44.24 293118 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.43 293119 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 133.81 293120 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 11.56 293121 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 15.98 293122 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 38.07 293123 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 68.22 293124 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 15.98 293125 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 50.82 293126 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 67.09 293127 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 18.54 293128 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 34.18 293129 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 73.58 °�- 293130 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 15.43 293131 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 12.25 293132 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 66.40 293133 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 22.11 293134 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.68 293135 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 35.74 293136 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 26.15 293137 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 2 6.4 4 293138 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 49.84 293139 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 24.04 293140 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 66.85 293141 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 30.85 293142 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 26.01 293143 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 162.66 293144 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 18.34 293145 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 39.50 293146 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 33.30 293147 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 47.09 293148 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 6.99 293149 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 23,81 293150 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 16.59 293151 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 41.80 293152 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 12.16 293153 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 51.90 293154 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 11.46 293155 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 57.69 293156 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 20.88 293157 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 23.60 293158 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.48 5 15 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293159 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 62.86 293160 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 26.30 293161 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 33.05 293162 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.48 293163 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 68.22 293164 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 28.68 293165 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 11.63 293166 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 26.14 293167 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 27.13 293168 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 10.50 293169 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 105.41 293170 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 544.75 293171 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 73.58 293172 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 6.96 293173 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 61.03 293174 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 1.84 293175 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 34.39 293176 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 69.10 293177 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 38.07 293178 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 161.51 293179 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 68.22 293180 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 36.94 293181 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 68.22 293182 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 31.07 293183 12/20/2012 UT REFUNDS 73.58 Grand Total: 873,560.08 6 16 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 2209 12/14/2012 KIMLEY HORN&ASSOC INC 60,139.00 2210 12/14/2012 CDM SMITH INC 5,689.23 2211 12/14/2012 1 R C HEALTH INSURANCE-TRUST 47,840.96 2212 12/14/2012 VETERANS COUNCIL OF I R C 5,381.71 2213 12/14/2012 SHD LEGAL GROUP PA 49,254.79 2214 12/18/2012 BENEFITS WORKSHOP 7,441.45 2215 12/18/2012 BENEFITS WORKSHOP 1,921.01 2216 12/19/2012 SCHOOL DISTRICT OF I R COUNTY 77,264.00 2217 12/19/2012 HICKS&SCHREIBER PA 671,348.75 Grand Total: 926,280.90 w� 17 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS.NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1000533 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 2,306.57 1000534 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 11,593.19 1000535 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 29.60 1000536 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 29.60 1000537 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 33,795.10 1000538 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 97,676.12 1000539 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 97,676.13 1000540 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 116,653.48 1000541 12/14/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 116,653.49 1000542 12/17/2012 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 153.40 1000543 12/17/2012 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 106.00 1000544 12/17/2012 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 270.66 1000545 12/17/2012 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 32.00 1000546 12/17/2012 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC 687.34 1000547 12/17/2012 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 197.12 1000548 12/17/2012 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 211.67 1000549 12/17/2012 EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER 226.00 1000550 12/17/2012 AT&T 2,994.60 1000551 12/17/2012 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 11,081.00 1000552 12/18/2012 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 296.13 1000553 12/18/2012 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 234.00 1000554 12/18/2012 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 741.90 1000555 12/18/2012 THE GALE GROUP 592.26 1000556 12/18/2012 MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 235.00 1000557 12/18/2012 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 337.21 1000558 12/18/2012 DEERE&COMPANY 524.61 1000559 12/18/2012 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 400.00 1000560 12/18/2012 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC 934.20 1000561 12/18/2012 RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 1,151.00 1000562 12/18/2012 FLAGLER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LLC 160.20 1000563 12/18/2012 S&S AUTO PARTS 370.66 1000564 12/19/2012 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 191.34 1000565 12/19/2012 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 362.26 1000566 12/19/2012 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 266.85 1000567 12/19/2012 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 589.53 1000568 12/19/2012 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 11,604.24 1000569 12/19/2012 THE EXPEDITER 268.70 1000570 12/19/2012 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 681.38 1000571 12/19/2012 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 3,271.10 1000572 12/19/2012 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC 110.07 1000573 12/19/2012 SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FL INC 811.90 1000574 12/19/2012 SHRIEVE CHEMICAL CO 8,363.10 1000575 12/19/2012 S& S AUTO PARTS 173.19 1000576 12/19/2012 EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER 234.00 1000577 12/19/2012 HYDRA SERVICE(S) INC 5,745.63 1000578 12/20/2012 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 317.05 1000579 12/20/2012 HENRY SCHEIN INC 9,441.40 1000580 12/20/2012 LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC 59.24 1000581 12/20/2012 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 99.00 1000582 12/20/2012 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 266.95 1000583 12/20/2012 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 276.97 1000584 12/20/2012 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 384.66 1000585 12/20/2012 OCE'NORTH AMERICA INC 809.67 Grand Total: 542,678.47 1 18 JEFFREY R. SMITH 4 G Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller 1801 2 7T" Street �LpRIpA Vero Beach, Florida 32961 -1028 Telephone (772) 226-1945 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 27, 2012 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS December 21, 2012 to December 27, 2012 FROM: DIANE BERNARDO - FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of December 21, 2012 to December 27, 2012. Attachment: DB: MS 19 UH CK5 W K1TTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293184 12/27/2012 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 800.39 293185 12/27/2012 GUARDIAN EQUIPMENT INC 792.00 293186 12/27/2012 JORDAN MOWER INC 252.20 293187 12/27/2012 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC 91,045.73 293188 12/27/2012 COPYCO INC DBA 29.12 293189 12/27/2012 RICOH USA INC 395.57 293190 12/27/2012 ALARM PARTNERS 116.34 293191 12/27/2012 CHISHOLM CORP OF VERO 1,569.60 293192 12/27/2012 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 9.36 293193 12/27/2012 VELDE FORD INC 857.83 293194 12/27/2012 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 714.34 293195 12/27/2012 AT&T WIRELESS 188.32 293196 12/27/2012 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 808.66 293197 12/27/2012 KELLY TRACTOR CO 30,425.83 293198 12/27/2012 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 159.17 293199 12/27/2012 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 2,453.61 293200 12/27/2012 SLP INVESTMENTS INC 1,250.00 293201 12/27/2012 KSM ENGINEERING&TESTING INC 800.00 293202 12/27/2012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS,LTD 4,020.01 293203 12/27/2012 PETES CONCRETE 800.00 293204 12/27/2012 EGP INC 307.89 293205 12/27/2012 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 125.72 293206 12/27/2012 TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC 1,038.66 293207 12/27/2012 PARAGON ELECTRIC INC 195.00 293208 12/27/2012 CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF IRC INC 20,299.88 293209 12/27/2012 CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF IRC INC 360.00 293210 12/27/2012 HOMELAND IRRIGATION 332.80 293211 12/27/2012 DELL MARKETING LP 1,480.63 293212 12/27/2012 GENERAL PART INC 2,713.82 293213 12/27/2012 BRANDTS APPLIANCE SERVICE INC 357.92 293214 12/27/2012 LOWES CO INC 3,299.55 293215 12/27/2012 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES INC 994.50 293216 12/27/2012 PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC 141.13 293217 12/27/2012 PAUL CARONE 3,113.00 293218 12/27/2012 GREENE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP LTD 3,114.58 293219 12/27/2012 LINDSEY GARDENS APARTMENTS 747.00 293220 12/27/2012 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD 554.00 293221 12/27/2012 PARKS AND SON INC 4,737.32 293222 12/27/2012 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 5,381.10 293223 12/27/2012 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 600.00 293224 12/27/2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 44,543.41 293225 12/27/2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 187,096.27 293226 12/27/2012 MEDICAL EXAMINERS OFFICE 23,651.41 293227 12/27/2012 VICTIM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 4,428.66 293228 12/27/2012 ROGER J NICOSIA 1,500.00 293229 12/27/2012 CITY OF VERO BEACH 6,424.62 293230 12/27/2012 CITY OF VERO BEACH 1,972.54 293231 12/27/2012 CITY OF VERO BEACH 11,562.50 293232 12/27/2012 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION#769 5,396.50 293233 12/27/2012 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC 5,103.00 293234 12/27/2012 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 631.61 293235 12/27/2012 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES 6,687.40 293236 12/27/2012 WAL MART STORES EAST LP 248.61 293237 12/27/2012 SAN MARCO INT'L INC 278.93 293238 12/27/2012 WILLIAM KEITH MCCULLY 74.00 293239 12/27/2012 ACUSHNET COMPANY 35.57 293240 12/27/2012 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE INC 85,678.25 293241 12/27/2012 CULTURAL COUNCIL OF IRC 8,256.00 1 20 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293242 12/27/2012 EXCHANGE CLUB CASTLE 5,308.17 293243 12/27/2012 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC 23,660.99 293244 12/27/2012 DUMONT COMPANY INC 16,109.50 293245 12/27/2012 DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING&TESTING 4,167.50 293246 12/27/2012 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 568.65 293247 12/27/2012 CITY OF SEBASTIAN 19,014.44 293248 12/27/2012 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 78.40 293249 12/27/2012 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 164.22 293250 12/27/2012 SPRINT SPECTRUM LP 960.52 293251 12/27/2012 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 72,846.78 293252 12/27/2012 COLLEEN PETERSON 500.00 293253 12/27/2012 TAYLOR MADE GOLF CO INC 2,357.15 293254 12/27/2012 FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYER LABOR 235.00 293255 12/27/2012 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER INC 5,049.38 293256 12/27/2012 STATE ATTORNEY 200.00 293257 12/27/2012 CITY OF FELLSMERE 21.77 293258 12/27/2012 GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC 237.94 293259 12/27/2012 STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES 425.00 293260 12/27/2012 HOMELESS FAMILY CENTER INC 5,838.59 293261 12/27/2012 TREASURE COAST SPORTS COMMISSION INC 13,000.00 293262 12/27/2012 INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CNTRL DIST 100.00 293263 12/27/2012 FLORIDA DEPT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT 192.00 293264 12/27/2012 WESTSIDE REPROGRAPHICS OF VERO BEACH INC 9.36 293265 12/27/2012 ADVANCED XEROGRAPHICS IMAGING 3,380.97 293266 12/27/2012 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 400.00 293267 12/27/2012 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 1,484.00 293268 12/27/2012 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 394.00 293269 12/27/2012 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 2,061.00 293270 12/27/2012 DAVID SPARKS 616.00 293271 12/27/2012 INDIAN RIVER INVESTMENT REALTY INC 452.00 293272 12/27/2012 JOHN COLONTRELLE 542.00 293273 12/27/2012 ARTHUR PRUETT 475.00 '`"" 293274 12/27/2012 VAN WAL INC 98.00 293275 12/27/2012 HYDROMENTIA 8,607.00 293276 12/27/2012 MICHAEL THIELE 90.00 293277 12/27/2012 UNITED FOR FAMILIES 550.43 293278 12/27/2012 PELICAN ISLES 260.00 293279 12/27/2012 GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 51,192.46 293280 12/27/2012 COAST TO COAST BUILDERS OF FLORIDA INC 6,241.50 293281 12/27/2012 STANLEY CONSULTANTS INC 9,486.60 293282 12/27/2012 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPE 249.90 293283 12/27/2012 BRAD GRASMAN 305.51 293284 12/27/2012 DEW BUSTERS INC 764.60 293285 12/27/2012 JOHN F BAER 34,256.00 293286 12/27/2012 HFB OF FLORIDA LLC 570.00 293287 12/27/2012 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 373.21 293288 12/27/2012 SESAC INC 1,062.00 293289 12/27/2012 EARRING POINT PROPERTIES 642.00 293290 12/27/2012 HALL-MARK FIRE APPARATUS INC 1,645.85 293291 12/27/2012 CHRIS K BLAHNIK 400.00 293292 12/27/2012 DOH RADIATION MACHINE PROGRAM 47.00 293293 12/27/2012 INDIAN RIVER RDA LP 388.00 293294 12/27/2012 REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC 2,942.93 293295 12/27/2012 STEVEN F BERNYK 1,494.00 293296 12/27/2012 MARK KNOWLES 507.00 293297 12/27/2012 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 465.40 293298 12/27/2012 VIRGINIA PINES 438.00 293299 12/27/2012 TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC 243.94 293300 12/27/2012 PAULA WHIDDON 553.00 14*,W 293301 12/27/2012 EQ THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMPANY 7,260.43 21 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 293302 12/27/2012 TRITEL INC 49.50 293303 12/27/2012 HOJOS TREES&LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES LLC 3,400.00 293304 12/27/2012 GATOR INVESTMENTS 784.00 293305 12/27/2012 DAVID WALSH&ASSOC 576.00 �... 293306 12/27/2012 BENEFITS WORKSHOP 673.62 293307 12/27/2012 JAMES W DAVIS 297.00 293308 12/27/2012 RADWELL INTERNATIONAL INC 148.74 293309 12/27/2012 NITA EZELL 427.00 293310 12/27/2012 GUETTLER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC 298,085.85 293311 12/27/2012 CITY DIRECTORIES 510.00 293312 12/27/2012 THERESA HALE 463.00 293313 12/27/2012 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 5,862.00 293314 12/27/2012 MISS INC OF THE TREASUE COAST 738.00 293315 12/27/2012 SOUTHERN ASSOCIATES LLC 647.00 293316 12/27/2012 BORO BUILDING&PROPERTY MAINT INC 4,720.13 293317 12/27/2012 CRAIG LOPES 332.00' 293318 12/27/2012 INTEGRITY LAWNS&LANDSCAPING 1,260.00 293319 12/27/2012 INDIAN RUN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 724.00 293320 12/27/2012 JMC SERVICES INC 255.00 293321 12/27/2012 MADISON VINES 563.00 293322 12/27/2012 TIGHT LINE PRODUCTIONS INC 250.00 293323 12/27/2012 AHEAD LLC 559.34 293324 12/27/2012 GFA 1NTER.NATIONAL INC 6,520.50 293325 12/27/2012 C M&S INDUSTRIES INC 2,000.00 293326 12/27/2012 YP LLC 142.30 293327 12/27/2012 HAYES E GOVERNMENT RESOURCES INC 40.00 293328 12/27/2012 FREDDA LOZADO 604.00 293329 12/27/2012 GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE LLC 5,012.05 293330 12/27/2012 MTD4 PELED LLC 444.00 293331 12/27/2012 FIVE STAR PROPERTY HOLDING LLC 800.00 293332 12/27/2012 WILD TURKEY ESTATES OF VERO LLC 620.50 293333 12/27/2012 CLOSE CONSTRUCTION LLC 68,217.30 293334 12/27/2012 REHMANN GROUP LLC 40,000.00 293335 12/27/2012 LYN DISTRIBUTING LLC 547.98 293336 12/27/2012 PHILIP LANGLEY 300.00 Grand Total: 1,339,510.76 22 hLEC TRUN1C; PAYMENTS - WIRE & AC;H TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 2218 12/21/2012 ICMA RET CORP 1,515.00 2219 12/21/2012 NACO/SOUTHEAST 32,043.63 Na- 2220 12/21/2012 FL SDU 8,297.97 2221 12/21/2012 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION 46,006.51 2222 12/21/2012 FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES,INC 5,821.03 2223 12/21/2012 NATIONWIDE SOLUTIONS RETIREMENT 145.83 2224 12/21/2012 ATLANTIC COASTAL LAND TITLE CO LLC 158,084.41 2225 12/26/2012 IRS-PAYROLL TAXES 321,715.43 2226 12/27/2012 CITY OF SEBASTIAN 120,885.96 Grand Total: 694,515.77 I 23 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS.NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1000586 12/21/2012 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 81.45 1000587 12/21/2012 MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 50.00 r.... 1000588 12/21/2012 ABCO GARAGE DOOR CO INC 1,062.50 1000589 12/21/2012 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 72.13 1000590 12/21/2012 DYNAMIC BRANDS LLC 103.75 1000591 12/21/2012 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 84.71 1000592 12/21/2012 L&L DISTRIBUTORS 1,015.82 1000593 12/27/2012 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 60.00 1000594 12/27/2012 SSES INC DBA 573.71 1000595 12/27/2012 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 702.91 1000596 12/27/2012 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 2,789.05 1000597 12/27/2012 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 195.39 1000598 12/27/2012 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 7,456.81 1000599 12/27/2012 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 138.72 1000600 12/27/2012 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 427.00 1000601 12/27/2012 FLAGLER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LLC 64.72 1000602 12/27/2012 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 7.61 1000603 12/27/2012 AUTO PARTNERS LLC 64.43 1000604 12/27/2012 L&L DISTRIBUTORS 216.20 1000605 12/27/2012 S& S AUTO PARTS 27.80 1000606 12/27/2012 EAST COAST ANII:ZA L MEDICAL CENTER 28.00 1000607 12/27/2012 HYDRA SERVICE(S)INC 4,504.12 1000608 12/27/2012 AT&T 12,712.38 1000609 12/27/2012 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 1,997.83 1000610 12/27/2012 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 93.32 Grand Total: 34,530.36 1 24 2D CONSENT AGENDA December 11, 2012 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: November 29, 2012 Subject: 2013 Blanket Authorization for Commissioners to Travel Out of County From: Terri Collins-Lister, Commissioner Assistant Description of Condition It is a requirement by the County auditor to include the date the Board approved out of county travel on the travel advance and voucher forms when submitting reimbursement from the Board of County Commissioners for travel. Presently all Commissioners sit on committees where out of county travel for all current and any future assigned committee meetings (i.e. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council meets in Stuart once a month). In addition to committee assignments, there are occasions when it is necessary for Board members to travel to Tallahassee to meet with State Representatives, Senators, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Department of Transportation, etc. regarding various county projects, grants, and proposed legislation. For the purpose of complying with the auditor's requirement of having an approval date on the travel voucher and advance forms, approval is requested to use today's meeting date when submitting reimbursement requests for the Board members out of county assigned committee meetings and Tallahassee travel. Recommendation Approval be granted for Board members to travel out of county for all current and any future assigned committee meetings, including travel to Tallahassee, Florida. 25 8.B. 2013 BLANKETAUTHORIZATION FOR COMMISSIONERS TO TRAVEL OUT °�-- OF COUNTY Commissioner Solari suggested that after a Commissioner travels out of County for a non-committee event,a notification and update should be provided to the public. He cited the example of Commissioner O'Bryan's upcoming matter(see Commissio r Items 14.C.1.),during which he will be discussing the Florida Association of Counties Le ative onference that he recently attended in Sarasota County(see Commissioner Items Chairman Flescher confirmed that Commissio Sol ' would like vide the information to the public either as an information (Item on the Board o y Commission Agenda,or by an update provided under 4 ssioners It s. Discussion followed about the im of County ' e t at the State level. For the sake of incorporating specific language s endat1 about authorizing the Commissioners to travel to Tallahassee as ne d ep committee-related activities), language was taken fro rt and inco rated int e Motion. N y Commissioner Solari, SEC D by sioner O'Bryan, to authorize the Board in rs to el out of County for all current and any future gned committee meetings; and on occasions it i ecessga for Board members to travel to T ee Florida to meet with State Representatives, Sen ors the Florida Department of Environmental Protection the Florida Department of Transportation, etc., regarding various County projects grants, and proposed legislation. 26 Vice Chairman Davis requested that the County Administrator have staff pattern future recommendations regarding out of County travel on the above Motion. Commissioner Zorc mentioned he would be travelling out of area quite a lot,because of his participation in the Florida Association of Counties' Certified County Commissioner(CCC) training program. The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTIO oard unanimously authorized the Board memb to tra t of County for: (1) all current and a assign committee meetings; and (2) occasio when it is necessary for Board members to 1 to ahassee, Florida to meet with State Representa Senators, the Florida Department vironmental tion, the Florida Department o tion, etc., ding various County projects, gr ts, islation. 27 CONSENT: 1/8/2013 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY L 1.6a ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr. — County Attor�ey--S DATE: December 26, 2012 RE: Permission to Advertise for Public Hearing for Amendment to Section 100.03(4) of the Indian River County Code, Codifying and Publishing the Ordinances to Readopt the Code up to and Including Supplement 94 as Published by the Municipal Code Corporation Section 125.68, Florida Statutes requires that each county maintain a current codification of all ordinances, which must be published annually by the Board of County Commissioners. Once codified, the Code is the best evidence of the current law of the County. The Code is codified through adoption of an ordinance; adoption of the ordinance must be preceded by public hearing. REQUESTED ACTION: Authorize staff to advertise for a public hearing on February 5, 2013 to amend Section 100.03(4) of the Indian River County Code. nhm Rpgroved Dats * ,•iJmtrLoft) 1 APPROVED FOR Legat I Z 3 0.0 NEE - C rlAGENDA s, C�(__�OUNTY�f1TTORNEY ?F, Consent Agenda-B.C.C. 01.08.13 ;v Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W. Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners c� FROM: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney DATE: December 21, 2012 SUBJECT: Amendment to Purchasing Manual Section 105.06 of the Indian River Code, entitled "Purchasing Policies and Procedures," provides that �- "the County Administrator shall prepare a policies and procedures manual which shall provide county employees with practices and procedures that are to be followed consistent with the principles embodied in this chapter." Pursuant to this provision, the County Administrator prepared a Purchasing Manual which has been utilized by County employees for many years. In the summer and fall of 2012, the Purchasing Manual was substantially rewritten, and was submitted for review and approval by the Board of County Commissioners, in light of the extent of the changes. The Board approved the revised manual on October 2, 2012. More recently, at its meeting on December 11, 2012, while reviewing an RFQ agenda item, the Board engaged in a lengthy discussion on the preferred method of ranking competing firms which respond to an RFP or RFQ, and asked staff to review the issue. Staff s review resulted in the attached proposed new section to the Purchasing Manual outlining a proposed ranking method. Indian River Co. 11 Approved Date APPROVED FOR JANUARY 8, 2013 Admin 11 3 B.C.C. MEETING—CONSENT Co.Atty. l2- •l z�- Budget - f ' Dept. -- �..• C NTYATT EY Risk Mgr. --- --- F.-UttameyTindaCENERALIB CCl4gendadlenmsNurcha inghlanuaLdo 29 Board of County Commissioners December 21, 2012 �•- Page Two Technically, Board approval is not required for inclusion of this proposed section in the Purchasing Manual. Pursuant to section 105.06, authority to adopt the section rests in the County Administrator. However, in light of the Board's interest in the issue, as reflected in the discussion at the December 11 meeting, the proposed section is presented for the Board's review and comment. In the absence of any objection by the Board, the proposed section will be adopted by the County Administrator for inclusion in the Purchasing Manual. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Board review the attached proposed section dealing with the method of ranking competing firms responding to an RFP or RFQ, and offer any comments or objections the Board may have. ATTACHMENT(S). Proposed Section 5.3, Ranking of Firms in RFP and RFQ Process ASP:LAC F:l4dorngVJ,d,1GEAER4LO C Cl4genda Afen Turcha ingAfanual.d- 30 5.3 RANKING OF FIRMS IN RFP AND RFQ PROCESS "%BW The ranking of firms in an RFP or RFQ process shall be done in the following manner: (a) the RFP or RFQ solicitation documents shall list the evaluation criteria and assign a maximum number of points available for each criterion. The total maximum number of points available for all criteria shall be 100, (b) each member of the evaluation committee shall evaluate each firm by assigning a number of points for each criterion and then totaling the number of points for all criteria, (3) each committee member shall then rank the firms on the basis of the total number of points received for all criteria, with the firm receiving the most points being ranked # 1, and (4) the rankings received by each firm from all committee members shall then be totaled and divided by the number of committee members, to produce an average ranking. The firm receiving the lowest average ranking (ie., closest to # 1) shall be ranked the # 1 firm, and the process repeated until all firms have been ranked according to their average ranking. In the event of a tie, the ranking of the tied firms shall be determined by a comparison of the total number of points received by each firm for all criteria from all committee members. After interviews in an RFQ process (or in an RFP process, if interviews are held), and based upon information learned during the interviews, each committee member may change the number of points assigned to an interviewed firm for one or more criteria, and change his or her ranking of the firm accordingly. The evaluation process shall continue until the evaluation committee declares the rankings final. 31 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM Nmw TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine SUBJECT: Work Order No. 17—Bridge Design Associates, Inc.—Release of Retainage Pedestrian Bridge -Old Dixie Highway Sidewalk from 38`h Lane to 65`1i Street IRC Project No. 0845 DATE: December 11, 2012 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On May 18, 2010, the Board of County Commissioners approved Work Order No. 17 with Bridge Design Associates, Inc.to design a single span V x 80'pedestrian bridge on the east side of the Old Dixie Highway over the Indian River Farms Water Control District's North Relief Canal for the FDOT Local Agency Program sidewalk project and to provide review and inspection services during construction of the pedestrian bridge for a total lump sum fee of$18,315.00. The Board of County Commissioners approved the release of retainage for the design portion of Work Order No. 17 on June 7, 2011 in the amount of$1,349.50. The project has been completed and Bridge Design Associates,Inc.has been paid$4,338.00 for review and inspection services during construction,with$482.00 �- held in retainage. Bridge Design Associates, Inc. has submitted Invoice No. 10-542/R, dated November 8, 2012, in the amount of$482.00 for final release of retainage. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available from the Gas Tax/Secondary Roads Retainage Account No. 109-206000- 10007—Old Dixie Highway Sidewalk 45th Street to 65`h Street. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends payment of Bridge Design Associates,Inc.Invoice No. 10-542/R,dated November 8,2012 in the amount of$482.00 for final release of retainage. ATTACHMENT Bridge Design Associates,Inc. Invoice No. 10-542/R1 Indian River County Approved Date Administration 3 DISTRIBUTION Budget I Z Bridge Design Associates,Inc. Legal APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Public Works Engineering FOR: January 8. 2012 32 BRIDGE DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. CONS ULT I N G E N G I N E E R S BRIAN C.RHEAULT,P.E. Invoice President Bill To Indian River County 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Attn: Christopher Kafer, P.E. Date Invoice# 11/8/2012 10-542/R Description Amount FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES ON: 482.00 OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER NORTH RELIEF CANAL WORK ORDER 17 Construction Contract Amount: $4,820.00 Invoiced to Date: $4,820.00 Paid to date: $4,338.00 RETAINAGE DUE: $482.00 Please Mail All Correspondence To The Address Below Total $482.00 1402 Royal Palm Beach Boulevard • Building 200 • Royal Palm Beach, Florida 33411 (561) 686-3660 0 Fax: (561) 791-1995 33 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA g MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director �— FROM: Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Enginee SUBJECT: 66th Avenue—Phase 2 (4th Street to 16th Street) Subordination of Utility Interests and Agreement for Reimbursement for Additional Facility Relocations for FPL IRC Project No. 9810B DATE: December 13, 2012 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On April 3, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners approved the award of bid for the construction of 66th Avenue from 4th Street to 16th Street. This project includes improvements to side streets as well (4th Street, 8th Street and 12th Street). In order to construct the proposed improvements,the relocation of power lines and poles is required. On 12th Street, there are two properties where Florida Power & Light (FPL) has utility easements for their poles and power lines. In these areas the cost of relocation of the FPL facilities is the responsibility of the County. Also, any future relocations of FPL facilities within the limits of the existing easements would be paid by the County. Attached is a Subordination of Utility Interests and Agreement for Reimbursement for Additional Facility Relocations, along with copies of the two easements. FPL typically requires approval of this document prior to relocation of their facilities. The execution of the agreement provides for the easements to be abandoned by FPL and the County agrees to pay for any future relocations of FPL facilities within the limits of the easements. FUNDING The FPL facilities have been relocated at a cost of $99,815. The agreement needs to be executed at this time, but no additional funding is required. F:tPublie NVorks\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROIECTS�98106-66th Ave Ph 2 4th St to 16th St\Adm11u%agenda items\BCC Agenda Subordination of Utility Interests FPL 12-13- 34 A 12doeT Page Two BCC Agenda Item from Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E. For January 8,.2013 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Subordination of Utility Interests and Agreement for Reimbursement for Additional Facility Relocations and authorize the Chairman to execute the same. ATTACHMENTS 1. Subordination of Utility Interests and Agreement for Reimbursement for Additional Facility Relocations 2. Exhibit A (copies of recorded easements) DISTRIBUTION 1. Dennis Pagano, Florida Power& Light Company 2. Michael D. Nixon, P.E., Roadway Production Manager 3. D. Howard,Jr., Construction Coordination Manager 4. Bryan Crain, Sr. Engineering Inspector APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR January 8, 2013 a BY ✓ i ' Indian River County Approv d Date Administration /13 I3 Budget 1 13 Legal Public Works Engineering fZ -17/Z F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\981013-66th Ave Ph 2 4th St to 16th St\Admim\agenda items\BCC Agenda Subordination of Utility Interests FPL 12-13- 35 .. This instrument prepared by: Dennis G.Pagano Florida Power&Light Company SUBORDINATION OF UTILITY INTERESTS AND AGREEMENT FOR REIlVIBURSEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL FACILITY RELOCATIONS THIS AGREEMENT,entered into this day of ,20_by and between the COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER,STATE OF FLORIDA,hereinafter called the"County",and FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY,a Florida Corporation,whose mailing address is P.O.Box 14000,Juno Beach,Florida 33408,hereinafter called"Utility". WITNESETH: WHEREAS,the Utility presently has an interest in certain lands that have been determined necessary for highway purposes;and WHEREAS,the proposed use of these lands for highway purposes will require subordination of the interest claimed in such-lands by Utility to the.County;and WHEREAS,the County is willing to pay for the initial relocation of the Utility's facilities within the public right-of- way to prevent conflict between the County's use and the Utility's use,and for the benefit of each,and WHEREAS the County,in addition,in recognition of the Utility's interest in the certain lands,is willing to pay for any future relocation of the Utility's facilities from or within the entire width of the public right-of-way shown on Exhibit "A",attached hereto and made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises of the parties hereto, Utility and County agree as follows: UTILITY subordinates any and all of its interest in its easement lands described on"EXE[IBIT A"attached hereto and made a part hereof, to the interest of the County, or its successors, for the purpose of constructing, improving, maintaining and operating a road over,through,upon,and/or across such Lands,based on the following: Nature of Date From In Favor of Recorded Encumbrance Book-Page EASEMENT December 14,1972 Edith Bennett Florida Power&Light Company BK424 PG693 EASEMENT January 16,1973 Betty Kaczorowski Florida Power&Light Company BK428 PG424 The County and the Utility further agree that: 1. "Public right-of-way",as used herein,shall mean that area which is described in Exhibit"A"and which includes the Utility's easements identified above and additional lands for public right-of-way, as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. The Utility shall have the right to construct, operate,maintain, improve, add to, upgrade, remove, and relocate facilities on,within, and upon the public right-of-way described in Exhibit"A",in accordance with the County's current minimum standards for such facilities as of the date of this agreement. Any new construction or relocation of facilities within the public right-of-way will be subject to prior approval by the County. 3. The County shall pay for the relocation of existing facilities. In addition, the Utility retains the right to be reimbursed,either now or in the future,for additional relocation or adjustment of its facilities located presently or to be located on the public right-of-way described in Exhibit"A",if such relocation or adjustment is caused by present or future uses of the right-of-way by Indian River County or its assigns, including,but not limited to,the cost of acquiring replacement easements. 4. The Utility shall have the right to enter upon the lands described in Exhibit "A" for the purposes outlined in Paragraph 2 above,including the right to trim such trees,brush,and growth which might endanger or interfere with such facilities. County shall provide and insure access to said lands by the Utility. 1 36 5. The Utility agrees to repair any damage to County facilities and to indemnify the County against any loss or damage resulting from the Utility exercising its rights to construct,operate,maintain,improve,add to,upgrade or remove its facilities on the said public right-of-way. wr- 6. This Agreement shall not be assigned by County except to the State of Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. Signed,sealed and delivered INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,A POLITICAL in the presence of: SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA By: By: Print Name: Title: Chairman By: Attested: Print Name: Print Name: STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF I hereby certify that on this day, befure me, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgements, personally appeared and to me known and personally known to me to be the persons described in,or has/have produced_ as identification and did(did not)take an oath and who executed the foregoing instrument as its and respectively,of the County of and severally acknowledged before me that they executed the same as such officials in the name and on behalf of said County of WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State aforesaid this_day of 20— My Commission Expires: Notary Signature: Notary Public State of Florida Printed Name: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL,�UFFIC1. t4CY BY WILLIAM K.DEBRAAL. DEPUTYCOUNTYATTORNEY (Execution and Acknowledgement continued on next page) `NOW 2 37 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. Signed,sealed and delivered FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY in the presence of: By: By: Title: Area Real Estate Manager Print Name: Print Name: By: Print Name: (Corp.Sea]) STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF PALM BEACH I hereby certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to take acknowledgements, personally appeared to me known and personally known to me to be the person described in,and did not take an oath and who executed the foregoing instrument as its Area Real Estate Manager of the Florida Power&Light Company and acknowledged before me that he executed the same as such official in the name and on behalf of said Corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State aforesaid this_day of ,20— My Commission Expires; Notary Signature: -- Notary Public State of Florida Printed Name: ,maw 3 38 EXHIBIT _ 1 of 2 i I -COpY i - EASEMENT , Chavre 6 Secn n. Loc n.,v down rip Se, _. R ngerr wer&Light Co pan rida:siders' of the pay t to me/us you of 5 and other and valuable rn ideration which e rved,11we and those ho rough me/us,grant and give to you and your successors an easement for the construction, operation and maintenance of electric utility facilitie:(including wires,pates,guys,cables, iconduits and appurtenant equipment)to be installed from time to time;with the ri tltt io recnnsiruci,improve,add [ to, change the sire of or remove such facilities or any of them:to permit the attachment of conduits,wires or cables of any other Company or person;also,to cut,trim and kc-.n clear all trees,brush and undergrowth or other ! obstructions that might endanger or interfere with said facilities,on,over,upon,under,and across my/our pro- party described as follows: Indian River Parns Co. S/D as in PBXs 2-25; Section 81 Townshi Hanle 39 hast, Indian River County, Florida, Trac' L•a South 951 p 33 South, of the i.sst 315.8 feet as in Ria 55, ?-133 and RB 57v ?1122, .13 feet ..a ca yore na culs describ as a ski"•" 0 rem 5 feet t.orth of and r allel :o tit :���r Cr :cation 1} oe, con re ne, be Inning t t" e st op y li c k*TAI ast ne. a, _ m ST T aFAM7A _�aeS 14E OEM, Ax 7 CA r ^ P REQUIRED ERY I'LORIDA LAZY • _ . ._.. P.0 4:: ft i.cq rL _ In the sent+ f:^ J .-dith T. Bennett P,,dr . -- _ (Seas) --- ---- ------ _ !Seep ! OFFM FSMM 39 EXHIBIT A 2 of 2 12� i EASEMENT DOOR L8 fA;E r . RV.01slomil 7 t or ER No. Loon Township Pole No. p ll Srnnfh Range_ 10 FA a P rte. r6 _197-Y Florida Power&Light Company Miami,Florida -Gentlemen: In cc derat n of he p ment to m s by ou of$1. Oa other dva able idler ionw ch /we haver iv ,I/w and hose holding th ugh a/us,gra tan give to you d y r succe n an a nt for the cons ton, para on and maintenan of lectric u)lily acilities(Inc ding ices pot guys, bl conduits and appurte nt uipment)to he inst lad{ time o to e• i right t reconstruct,' prove, to,change the site o or r move such facilitie 'or a y of the :to permit the an mens of condor s,wIr or cables of any other C pa or person:also,t cut, im and eep clear all tre rush and undergro or ther Obstructions that mi end ger or interfere it id facilit ,o over,u party describ as Iio Don,under,and across m lour ro Indic Iver Farm Co. 3 D s in PB 2-2 • Sect n 7, Townsh 3 South Range 9 East, Indian River ounty, Florida, Tract _, South of :lain Canal. The easement more particularly described as a strip 10 feet wide, centered 55 feet Borth of and parallel to the Quarter Section liner beginning at the East property line and running to the West line. i vr1 )ESS 'r kw. .j,nr REQUIRE HY L9R A °"`� £ t zratio 't F,D +l P0f'.a 6 UNT QM-f In the presence of: t n.P:trrk R al) ett EvaHeatt Baczorowski { al) (Seal) ,_,•m � ` .r� DOCUMENTARY= �^ • ! SUM TAY_ w �TA7E^oma FLORIDA I • i O �''�f� .��t•It)).���Z,It �y � CC G � �F:�'t•.�ti�-�'rj#f`i)i) '�7 i i 40 • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Directorc� FROM: Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Enginee SUBJECT: Award of Bid No: 2013007 Correction Indian River Boulevard Resurfacing(41St Street to 53rd Street) IRC Project No. 1131 DATE: December 14, 2012 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On December 4, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Award of Bid for resurfacing Indian River Boulevard from 41St Street to 53rd Street. The lowest responsive, responsible bidder was Community Asphalt Corporation with a bid of $776,945.42. FUNDING It was shown in the agenda item that the Small County Outreach Program Grant(SCOP)would contribute $582,709.07 and the County would match 25% or $194,26.35. However,the approved SCOP grant agreement shows a maximum contribution of$470,063.00. Therefore, the County portion for this project is $306,882.42, which will be funded from Secondary Roads/Indian River Boulevard Resurfacing/41St Street to 53rd Street, Account No. 10921441-053360-12007. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the revised funding amounts. DISTRIBUTION Indian River County Approv Date 1. Jerry Davis, Purchasing Manager 2. Terry Cook, Road & Bridge Superintendent Administration Budget Za APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Legal FOR January 8, 2013 Public Wdrks Engineering _�- BY Purchasing D��02�13 F: blic Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1131-IR Blvd Resurfacing 41 st St to 53rd St-SEE PROJ 0927\Admim\agenda item_ s\BCC Agenda 41 Award of Bid Correction 12-14-12.doc 2T Consent Agenda Indian River County Interoffice Memorandum Office of Management & Budget To: Members of the Board ofe'outt Commissioners From: Jason E. Brown Director, Office of Manage nt Budget Date: January 2, 2013 Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 005 Description and Conditions The attached budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following: 1. Each year it becomes necessary to "roll over" certain projects that were initiated in fiscal year 2011-2012 to the current fiscal year. The attached entry appropriates funding for these projects for fiscal year 2012-2013. 2. On November 20, 2012 payment from the State Criminal Alien Assistant Program (SCAAP) in the amount of $78,306 was received by the County. The program provides funding to participating jurisdictions for the partial reimbursement of costs incurred by incarcerating undocumented criminal aliens in their correctional facilities. At the Board meeting of December 4, 2012, the BCC approved distribution of these funds to the Sheriff. The attached entry appropriates these funds. 3. Human Services has received a $500 donation from Florida Power & Light to purchase food supplies for families in need of assistance. The attached entry appropriates funding to Human Services/Food & Dietary account. 4. The Florida Dept. of Labor has invoiced the County for unemployment compensation in various departments for the quarter ending September 30, 2012. The attached entry appropriates unemployment compensation from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency $3,095, MSTU/Reserve for Contingency $3,136, Transportation Fund/Reserve for Contingency $4,950, Emergency Services/Reserve for Contingency $3,474 and Sandridge/Cash Forward-Oct 1St $167. 5. The Court Technology Fund will use Cash Forward-Oct 1St to fund the balance of the budgets requested by Court Administration and Guardian Ad Litem. The attached entry appropriates funding in the amount of$57,409. 6. The Sebastian Redevelopment District expense is based upon the Property Appraiser's final tax increment adjustment. The final adjustment has an increase of $788.00 over the amount budgeted for FY 12/13. The attached entry appropriates funding in the amount of $788.00 from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency. 7. The Computer Services Department is in need of miscellaneous equipment totaling $14,900. The attached entry appropriates funding from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency. 42 Board of County Commissioners December 11, 2012 Page 2 of 2 8. A reimbursable purchase order from the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation has been issued to our Parks Conservation department in an effort to protect Gopher Tortoise habitats. The attached entry appropriates $10,000 for this expenditure. 9. On December 18, 2012 the Board of County Commissioners approved authorizing up to $7,000 from General Fund Reserve for Contingencies for the sole purpose of paying landfill fees associated with the PACE Project. The attached entry appropriates these funds. 10. On September 6, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners approved a three year joint participation agreement (JPA) between the FDOT and Indian River County in the amount of $220,000 for FY 2012/13. The attached entry appropriates the additional funding. 11. On October 2, 2012 the Board of County Commissioners approved additional funding in the amount of $143,877 for replacement fire alarms at the Indian River County Jail. The attached entry appropriates these funds from Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward. 12. On October 23, 2012 the Board of County Commissioners approved partnering with the Rotary Club in support of "RISSA" — Rotary Initiative for Submerged Seagrass Awareness. The attached entry appropriates funding in the amount of $9,300 from Florida Boating Improvements Fund/Cash Forward-Oct 1st. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached budget resolution amending the fiscal year 2012/2013 budget. Attachments Budget Amendment 005 and Resolution APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River County Approved Date BY. ! a l�� AdministratorCR 3 Jos ph A. aird Legal County Administrator Budget ( Z 13 F : January 8, 2013 Department Risk Management �a..- 43 RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 BUDGET. WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the adopted Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County desires to amend the fiscal year 2012-2013 budget, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of ) 2013. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Board of County Commissioners Clerk of Court and Comptroller By By Deputy Clerk Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEG FFIC NCY BY COU Y ATTORNEY 44 /� Exhibit "A" Resolution No.2012- Budget Office Approval: Budget Amendment:005 Jason E Brown Budget Director Entry Fund/Depart Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease Number 1. Revenue General Fund/Intergovernmental/Homeland Security 001033-331200-11801 $46,365 $0 General Fund/Intergovernmental/2011 Homeland 001033-331200-12805 $16,500 Security Grant $0 General Fund/Intergovernmental/FEMA Cert Grant 001033-331200-12803 $7,654 $0 General Fund/Miscellaneous/Donations-Main Library 001038-366095 $1,379 $0 General Fund/Miscellaneous/Other Contributions- 001038-366090 $1,077 $0 Donations General Fund/Non Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct list 001039-389040 $42,505 $0 MSTU/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 004039-389040 $28,959 $0 Traffic Impact Fees/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1 st 102039-389040 $4,541,274 $0 Impact Fees/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 103039-389040 $3,985,286 $0 Secondary Roads/Intergovernmental/DOT Grant/Old Dixie Sidewalk 45th to 65th 109033-331400-10007 $378,108 $0 Secondary Roads/Intergovernmental/DOT SCOP 109033-334400-12005 $460,666 Grant/CR 512 Resurfacing $0 Secondary Roads/Intergovernmental/DOT SCOP 109033-334400-12006 $1,038,836 Grant/27th Avenue Resurfacing $0 Secondary Roads/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 109039-389040 $2,205,187 $0 Emergency District/Intergovemmental/FEMA FF Assistance Grant 114033-331210-12808 $17,089 $0 Emergency District/Non-Revenue-Cash Forward-Oct 1 st 114033-389040 $1,640,070 $0 Emergency Services District/Fire Rescue/EMS County Awards Capital 114033-334290 $7,007 $0 Beach Restoration/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 128039-389040 $207,616 $0 NSP/Miscellaneous/Grant Program Income 129038-369919-09128 $188,459 $0 NSP/Miscellaneous/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 129039-389040 $205,134 $0 NSP3/Miscellaneous/NSP3 130033-331554-11803 $1,400,016 $0 Florida Boating Improvement Program/Cash Forward- 133039-389040 $200,000 Oct 1 st $0 Library Bequests/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 134039-389040 $9,358 $0 Traffic Education/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 137039-389040 $23,803 $0 Land Acquisition Series 2004/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 145039-389040 $100,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Intergovernmental/DOT LAP Grant/ 315033-331400-12804 $934,375 Old Dixie Sidewalk $0 45 Exhibit "A" Resolution No.2012- NOWBudget Office Approval: Budget Amendment:005 Jason E.' rown, udget ' or Entry Fund/De art en ccount Name Number p Account Number Increase Decrease Optional Sales Tax/Intergovernmental/FDOT Trip Grant/66th Ave/SR 60 to 41st 315033-334404-06040 $6,270,379 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 315039-389040 $10,605,619 $0 SWDD/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 411039-389040 $41,832 $0 Expense General Fund/Main Library/Books 00110971-035450 $1,379 $0 General Fund/Brackett Library/Book Proceeds 00111371-039999 $1,543 $0 General Fund/Law Library/Books 00111914-035450 $1,077 $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Other 00120825-033190-11801 $46,365 Professional Services/Homeland Security Grant $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Other 00120825-033190-12805 $16,500 Professional Services/2011 Homeland Security Grant $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Other 00120825-035290 $962 Operating Supplies $0 General Fund/Emergency Management/Other 00120825-035290-12803 $7,654 Operating Supplies/FEMA Cert Grant $0 General Fund/Parks/Other Capital Improvements- Fairgrounds 00121072-066391 $40,000 $0 MSTU Fund/Recreation/Outside Printing 00410872-034720 $4,588 $0 MSTU Fund/Recreation/AthleticsNero Codgers 00410872-041120-05999 $632 $0 MSTU Fund/Rand&Bridge/Other Contractual Services 00421441-033490 $23,739 $0 Traffic Impact Fees/District III/66th Ave/4th to 12th 10215341 066510-02031 $813,592 Street $0 Traffic Impact Fees/District III/Oslo Rd/43rd Ave to 58th 10215341-066510-05004 $1,430,800 $0 Traffic Impact Fees/District III/Oslo Rd/27th to 43rd Ave 10215341-066510-06018 $1,114,950 $0 Traffic Impact Fees/District I/CR 510/512 to 70th Street 10215141-066510-06020 $665,021 $0 Traffic Impact/District I/ROW/CR 510155th to Indian River 10215141-066120-05023 $516,911 $0 Impact Fees/Fire Services/Refunds 10312022-036690 $7,248 $0 Impact Fees/Fire Services/Station#13 10312022-066510-08006 $1,325,217 $0 Impact Fees/Fire Services/Rec.Storage Dist.Center 10312022-066510-12011 $297,672 $0 Impact Fees/Law Enforecement/Crime Scene Unit Bldg Rennovation 10360021-066510-01004 $866,494 $0 Impact Fees/Law Enforcement/Refunds 10360021-036690 $22,150 $0 Impact Fees/Parks/Oslo Boat Ramp 10321072-066510-03017 $173,688 $0 46 Exhibit "A" Resolution No.2012- Budget Office Approval: :Jason E. rown, udget Direc or Budget Amendment:005 Entry Fund/Depart ccount NameNumber Account Number Increase Decrease Impact Fees/Parks/South County Intergenerational Multi Purpose Facility 10321072-066510-03028 $826,887 $0 Impact Fees/Parks/Sporting Clays Course 10321072-066510-12001 $390,000 $0 Impact Fees/Parks/Refunds 10321072-036690 $75,930 $0 Secondary Roads/Old Dixie Sidewalk 45-65th 10921441-066510-10007 $378,108 $0 Secondary Roads/Oslo Road/43rd to 58th Ave 10921441-066510-05004 $1,754,323 $0 Secondary Road&Bridge/Other Contractual Services/Annual Survey Serivices 10921441-033490-05007 $245,599 $0 Secondary Road&Bridge/Other Contractual Services/Township/Section Horizontal Control 10921441-033490-05008 $26,372 $0 Secondary Road&Bridge/Other Contractual Services/NGVD/NAVD88 Vertical Control 10921441-033490-05009 $4,379 �$O ] Secondary Road&Bridge/Other Contractual Services 10921441-033490 $174,514 $0 Secondary Roads/Road Resurfacing/CR 512 10921441-053360-12005 $460,666 Eastbound Road Resurfacing $0 Secondary Roads/Road Resurfacing/27th Ave 10921441-053360-12006 Resurfacing/Oslo to SR 60 $1,038,836 $0 Emergency District/Fire Services/Fire Station#13 11412022-066510-08006 $426,304 $0 Emergency District/Fire Services/Med Unit 11412022-066420 $225,000 $0 Emergency Services District/Fire Rescue/Other 11412022-037310 Operating Supplies $2117 $0 Emergency Services District/Fire Rescue/EDP 11412022-066470-12808 $21,361 Equipment/Assistance to Firefighters Grant $0 Emergency Services District/Fire 11412022-066510-08006 $982,377 Rescue/Construction/Station#13 $0 Emergency Services District/Fire Rescue/Other 11412022-037310 Operating Supplies $5,274 $0 Emergency Services District/Fire Rescue/EMS County 11412022-066910 $1,733 Awards Capital $0 Beach Restoration/Other Contractual Services/Sea 12814472-035290-12815 $790 Turtle Conservancy Grant $0 Beach Restoration/Construction in Progress/Sector 3 Beach Restoration 12814472-066510-05054 $206,826 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Regular Salaries/NSP PGI 12913854-011120-09128 $549 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Overtime/NSP PGI 12913854-011140-09128 $2,569 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Social Security Matching/NSP PGI 12913854-012110-09128 $302 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Retirement Contribution/NSP PGI 12913854-012120-09128 $447 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Medicare Matching/NSP PGI— 12913854-012170-09128 $203 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Other Professional Services/NSP PGI 12913854-033190-09128 $295 $0 47 xhibit "A" Resolution No.2012- Budget Office Approval: Budget Amendment:005 Jason E. rown, udget Director Entry Fund/Depart en ccount Name Account Number Increase Decrease Number CDBG House Rehab/Other Contractual Services/NSP 12913854-033190-09128 $13 $0 PGI CDBG House Rehab/Travel/NSP PGI 12913854-034020-09128 $461 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Office Supplies/NSP PGI 12913854-035110-09128 $754 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Misc.Income/NSP PGI 12913854-036710-09128 $3,642 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Inter Dept.Charges/NSP PGI 12913854-036990-09128 $22,914 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Closing Funds/Homes for 12913854-088052-09128 $156,310 $0 Sale/NSP PGI CDBG House Rehab/Regular Salaries/NSP Grant 12913854-011120-09129 $2,403 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Overtime/NSP Grant 12913854-011140-09129 $26,545 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Social Security Matching/NSP 12913854-012110-09129 $1,220 $0 Grant CDBG House Rehab/Retirement Contribution/NSP 12913854-012120-09129 $1,766 $0 Grant CDBG House Rehab/Insurance Life&Health/NSP 12913854-012130-09129 $400 $0 Grant w.. CDBG House Rehab/Medicare Matching/NSP Grant 12913854-012170-09129 $484 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Travel/NSP Grant 12913854-034020-09129 $162 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Office Supplies/NSP Grant 12913854-035110-09129 $100 $0 CDBG House Rehab/Closing Homes/Homes Rent/NSP 12913854-088051-09129 $839 $0 Grant CDBG House Rehab/Closing Homes/Homes Sale/NSP 12913854-088052-09129 $171,215 $0 Grant NSP3 Grant/Other Contractual Services-Rehab 13013854-033490-11803 $1,357,662 $0 NSP3 Grant/Other Contractual Services-PGI 13013854-033490-11813 $29,542 $0 NSP3 Grant/All Travel/PGI 13013854-034020-11803 $282 $0 NSP3 Grant/Office Supplies/PGI 13013854-035110-11803 $600 $0 NSP3 Grant/Inter Dept.Charges/PGI 13013854-036990-11803 $6,159 $0 NSP3 Grant/Home Maintenance Costs/PGI 13013854-036990-11803 $393 $0 NSP3 Grant/Acquisition/Closing Funds/PGI 13013854-088052-11803 $4,963 $0 NSP3 Grant/NSP Developer Fee/PGI 13013854-088053-11803 $415 $0 FL Boating Improvement Program/Parks/Oslo Road 13321072-066510-03017 $200,000 $0 Boat Ramp Library Bequests/Main Library/Books 13410971-035450 $169 $0 48 xhibit "A" Resolution No.2012- Budget Office Approval: Budget Amendment:005 Jason E. rown, udget Director Entry Fund/DepartAccount Name Account Number Increase Decrease Number Library Bequests/North County Library/Maintenance- 13411271-034690 $8,450 $0 Other Equipment Library Bequests/North County Library/Books 13411271-035450 $739 $0 Traffic Education/Agencies/IRC School District 13711041-088001 $10,634 $0 Traffic Education/Agencies/Saint Edwards School 13711041-088002 $13,169 $0 Land Acquisition Series 2004/Other Professional 14514639-033190 $100,000 $0 Services Optional Sales Tax/Parks/Other Improvements Except 31521072-066390 $23,554 $0 Building Optional Sales Tax/Road&Bridge/IR Blvd Sidewalk- 31521441-066510-08019 $28,553 $0 12th to 17th Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Mgmt/Fiberoptics 31522019-066510-03006 $359,680 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Mgmt/Jail Fire Alarm 31522019-066510-10010 $184,680 $0 System Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Mgmt/Crime Scene Unit 31522019-066510-01004 $1,275,803 $0 Bldg Rennovation Optional Sales Tax/Public Works/Drainage System 31524338-066340 $2,246,562 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Public Works/Egret Marsh Reg. 31524338-066510-05057 $1,150,000 $0 �.� Stormwater Optional Sales Tax/Public Works/Subregional Water 31524338-066510-13007 $100,000 $0 Lettuce Scrub System Optional Sales Tax/Road&Bridge/66th Ave/12th St to 31521441-066510-06021 $500,207 $0 SR 60 Optional Sales Tax/Road&Bridge/ROW/66th Ave/SR 31521441-066210-06040 $10,186,334 $0 60-49th St Optional Sales Tax/Road&Bridge/ROW/CR510/55th 31521441-066120-05023 $1,000,000 $0 Ave to Indian River Optional Sales Tax/Road&Bridge/4th St-82nd Ave 31521441-066510-13008 $755,000 $0 Intersection SWDD/CC&Recycling/Convenience Center Repaving 41125534-044699-12010 $41,832 $0 2. Revenue General Fund/Intergovernmental/DOJ/SCAAP Grant 001033-331207 $78,306 $0 Expense General Fund/Sheriff/Detention Center 00160086-099140 $78,306 $0 3. Revenue General Fund/Misc/Other Contribution-Donation 001038-366090 $500 $0 Expense General Fund/Human Services/Food&Dietary 00121164-035280 $500 $0 49 Resolution No.2012- Thibit "A" Budget Office Approval: Budget Amendment:005 Jason E.B own, udget Director Entry Fund/Departa ccount Name Account Number Increase Decrease Number 4. Revenue Sandridge/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 418039-389040 $167 $0 Expense General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 $3,095 General Fund/Parks/Unemployment Compensation 00121072-012150 $508 $0 General Fund/Human Resources/Unemployment 00120313-012150 $2,587 $0 Compensation MSTU/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 00419981-099910 $0 $3,136 MSTU/NCAC/Unemployment Compensation 00410472-012150 $936 $0 MSTU/Env Planning/Unemployment Compensation 00420724-012150 $2,200 $0 Transportation Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 11119941-099910 $0 $4,950 Transportation Fund/County Engineering/ 11124441-012150 $1,925 $0 Unemployment Compensation Transportation Fund/Traffic Engineering/ 11124541-012150 $1,925 $0 ,*SAW Unemployment Compensation Transportation Fun d/Stormwater/Unemployment 11128138-012150 $1,100 $0 Compensation Emergency Services/Fire Services/Reserve for 11412022-099910 $0 $3,474 Contingency Emergency Services/Fire Services/Unemployment 11412022-012150 $3,474 $0 Compensation Sandridge/Admin-Clubhouse/Unemployment 41823672-012150 $167 $0 Compensation 5. Revenue Court Technology/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 142039-389040 $57,802 $0 Expense Court Technology/Court Administration 14290101-088400 $57,409 $0 Court Technology/Guardian Ad Litem/Other 14290185-033190 $393 $0 Professional Services 6. Expense General Fund/Redevelopment District/Sebastian 00113719-088220 $788 $0 Redevelopment General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 F$788 50 hibit "A" Resolution No.2012- Budget Office Approval: Budget Amendment:005 " Jason E. B own,Yget Direc Entry Fund/Depart n ccount Name Account Number Increase Decrease Number 7. Expense General Fund/Computer Services/Computer Software 00124113-035120 $11,000 $0 General Fund/Computer Services/EDP Equipment 00124113-066470 $3,900 $0 General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 $14,900 8. Revenue M.S.T.U.Fund/Miscellaneous/Other Miscellaneous 004038-369900 $10,000 $0 Revenue Expense M.S.T.U.Fund/Parks/Other Contractual Services 00421072-033490 $10,000 $0 9. Expense General Fund/Planning&Development/Other 00120415-033190 $7,000 $0 Professional Services General Fund/Reserves/Reserve for Contingency 00119981-099910 $0 $7,000 10. Revenue Transportation Fund/DOT Traffic Signal 111033-334401-12804 $220,000 $0 Grant/Fiberoptics Improvements#AQH28 Expense Transportation Fund/Traffic Engineering/Fiberoptics 11124541-066510-12804 $220,000 $0 Improvements#AQH28 11. Revenue Optional Sales Tax/Non-Revenue/Cash Forward-Oct 315039-389040 $143,877 $0 1st Expense Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Management/Jail Fire 31522019-066510-10010 $143,877 $0 Alarm System 12. Revenue Florida Boating/Cash Forward Oct 1st 133039-389040 $9,300 $0 Expense F- I Florida Boating/Parks/Boating Facility 13321072-066380 $9,300 �$o 51 Indian River County Inter-Office Memorandum Office of Management and Budget TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 2, 2013 SUBJECT: Mental Health Association fu7ino iscal year 2012/13 FROM: Jason E. Brown, CGFO Director, Management & Budg Background As the Board is aware, the Mental Health Association has experienced some serious operational problems during the last few months. These events have led to the resignation of the organization's CEO and a major turnover of the Board of Directors. The Hospital District, the United Way, and the Robert F. and Eleonora W. McCabe Foundation have suspended funding for the agency in light of the organization's problems. Additionally, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) has launched an investigation regarding various financial and operational matters at the Mental Health Association. The County's approved budget for this fiscal year includes funding for the Mental Health Association in the amount of $26,125. On December 20, 2012, staff sent a letter (see attachment) to the agency advising that reimbursements would be suspended based upon the aforementioned events. The letter further advised that the matter would be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for a policy decision on January 8, 2013. At this time, staff is recommending that the Board of Commissioners suspend funding for the Mental Health Association until new leadership is in place, the DCF investigation is complete, and the agency has presented a plan of action to prevent a recurrence of the operational problems experienced recently. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners suspend funding for the Mental Health Association for fiscal year 2012/13 until new leadership is in place, the DCF investigation is complete, and the agency has presented a plan of action to prevent a recurrence of the previous operational issues. Attachment Indian River County Approved Date Letter to Kristine D. Sarkauskaus, dated Administrator 113113 December 20, 2012 County Attorney Z - (3 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Budget 1 BY: &2"`=& Jose h A. Baird 1"W County Administrator FOR: January 8 2013 F:\Budget\Jason\agenda 201213\Mental Health Association Funding for 201213.doc 52 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3388 Office of Management & Budget6 Telephone: (772) 226-1214 SIC �1c ,tee 115)A December 20, 2012 f f. Mental Health Association Ms. Kristine D. Sarkauskas, President and CEO 820 37th Place Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Ms. Sarkaus_k_as: On September 19, 2012, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved funding for the Mental Health Association Walk-In Center for the 2012/2013 fiscal year, starting October 1, 2012. Based upon recent events surrounding the management of the Mental Health Association, the Indian River County Budget Office is suspending reimbursements to the organization. This matter will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners on January 8, 2013. Any decision to suspend funding will be re-evaluated once new leadership is in place with the Mental Health Association. If you have any questions, please contact me at(772) 226-1214. Sincerely, Jaso E. own Dire for anagement&Budget cc: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Robert Young, Chairman, Board of Directors, Mental Health Assoc. 53 �L ,NOW INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director AND Christopher J. Kafer, Jr., P.E., County Engine 5r FROM: David W. Schryver, P.S.M., County Surveyor SUBJECT: Work Order No. 3 Final Pay and Release of Retainage Masteller, Moler, Reed & Taylor, Inc. — 87th Street Right-of-Way and Topographic Survey IRC Project No. 1205 DATE: December 18, 2012 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On May 22,2012,the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners approved Work Order No.3 with Masteller, Moler, Reed &Taylor, Inc. to perform all related field and office Surveying and Mapping services in connection with the preparation of a Right-of-Way and topographic survey of 87th Street from CR 510 to 101St Avenue for a lump sum fee of$21,195.00. Masteller, Moler, Reed & Taylor, Inc. has been paid $17,167.95 to date. The project is complete and Masteller, Moler, Reed&Taylor, Inc. has submitted Invoice No.3544-11473 Final dated December 14, 2012 in the amount of$4,027.05 for final payment and release of retainage for a total of$21,195.00. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available through the following: Secondary Roads Gas Tax, Acct. No. 10921441-033490-05007—Annual Survey Services in the amount of$2,119.50 and Secondary Road Retainage Gas Tax Acct. No. 10920600-05007 in the amount of$1,907.55. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends payment of Masteller, Moler, Reed&Taylor, Inc. Invoice No.3544-11473,Final dated December 14,2012 in the amount of$4,027.05 for final payment and release of retainage for Work Order No. 3. F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1205-Vero Lake Estates Swk-87th St-101st Ave to CR510(LAP)\Survey\Work Orders\1205 BCC Agenda req MMRT WO Final Pay Release Retainage 12-18-12 A.doc 54 PAGE TWO BCC Agenda item from David W. Schryver, P.S.M. For January 8, 2013 BCC DISTRIBUTION Masteller, Moler, Reed & Taylor, Inc. ATTACHMENTS Masteller, Moler, Reed & Taylor, Inc. Invoice No. 3544-11473 Final, Dated 12-14-12. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: January 8, 2013 Apgr^d Date Administration 3 /,3 B a "— 13 Budget ' Legal ' ;I 1 C Public Works -.2 ,Z6 /z Engineering Ile 55 s - Masteller, Moler, Reed & Taylor, Inc. 1655 27th Street, Suite'2 Vero Beach, FL 32960 - IS�L�O v LSD Phone: 772-564-8050 Fax: 772-794-0647 DEC 14 2012 e-mail: dt5243@bellsouth.net INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DIVISION Invoice To: Indian River County Invoice #: 3544-11473 Mr. David Schryver Date: 12/14/2012 1801 27th Street, Building A Project ID: 6634 Vero Beach, FL 32960 Terms: Net 30 Days Job Description: Professional surveying services rendered for the 87th Street Right-of-Way & Topographic Survey, Indian River County Project#1205, Work Order No. 3 for Professional Services Agreement Annual Surveying & Mapping/GIS Services Contract No. 1032 2011-2012. Contract Amount: $21,195.00 @ 100 % Complete......................$21,195.00 (Less Previous Invoices @ 90% Complete)...............................($19,075.50) $ 2,119.50 Retainage held to date...............................................................$ 1,907.55 Total Amount Due..................................... 4,027.05 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Make Checks Payable to Masteller, Moler, Reed & Taylor, Inc. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- - Please remit a copy of this invoice with your payment. Thank You! APPROVED BY THE INDIAN RIVER I-- DATE:- 1 ATE:1 N(TIAL: Please Note: No final documents or drawings will be released without payment in full. paymen s are ipt. All accounts past 30 days will be subject to 2% monthly interest and a $25 administrative service fee will also be charged .. for each monthly Statement of Account issued after the work is completed or suspended by either party. Accounts past 45 days will be subject to lien, unless other arrangements were made at time Contract was signed. (See Contract Standard Conditions) 56 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engine SUBJECT: Work Order No. 3 to the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services with Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC for Engineering Drawings and Scope of Work for Roof Replacement over the Indian River County Fairgrounds Agricultural Pavilion Indian River County Project No. 1238 DATE: December 17, 2012 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On November 15, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services with Schulke, Bittle&Stoddard, LLC. Work Order No. 3 with Schulke, Bittle &Stoddard, LLC will provide signed and sealed engineering drawings and a scope of work for contractor bids for the re-roofing of the Agricultural Pavilion at the Indian River County Fairgrounds for a lump sum of$1,750.00. FUNDING Funding for Work Order No. 3 is budgeted and available from Account Number 00121072-066391-General Fund/Parks/Other Capital Improvements-Fairgrounds. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the attached Work Order No. 3 authorizing the above-mentioned tasks as outlined in the attached scope of services and requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Work Order No.3 on their behalf for a lump sum amount of$1,750.00. ATTACHMENTS Work Order No. 3, Schulke, Bittle&Stoddard, LLC Indian River County Approved Date Exhibit A—Scope of Services dated December 20, 2012 t 3 Administration DISTRIBUTION Legal Joseph W.Schulke, P.E., Schulke, Bittle&Stoddard, LLC Budget i3 Michael Hotchkiss, P.E., Utilities Capital Project Manager Public Works APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Engineering Division FOR: January 8, 2013 General Services BY: seph . Baird, County Administrator F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1238-IRC Fairgrounds-Ag Pavilion Roof Replacement\Admim\agenda items\BCC Agenda 57 F r Arhn'nr R;ttla k 0'f dM Td Wn 1 11-17_17"l— WORK ORDER NUMBER 3 -- This Work Order Number 3 is entered into as of this day of 201_, pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15, 2011, (the "Agreement") by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, LLC ("CONSULTANT'). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the lump sum fee set forth in Exhibit A. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit A (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SCHULKE, BITTLpe& OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY �.. STODD C. B K. BY olt7 � �v0�� Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman itl mAryq�yiN�f/!7 /17 BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffry R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By Deputy Clerk Approved: _J, &A osep A. Baird, County Administrator A ro .ed a!E� to for n)ani j legal sufficiency: Alan Polackwich, County Attorney CADocuments and Settings\lhamilton\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\EIIOWW3E\Work Order No 3-Schulke Bittle Stoddard LLC 12-17-12.doc 58 JOSEPtf W.SCHULKE,RE SCHULKE, BITTLE & STODDARD, L.L.C. JODAH B.SITTLE,PE. WILLIAM P.STODDARD,Ph.D.,RE CIVIL&STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING December 20, 2012 Chris Kafer, P.E. Indian River County V L1'B T n Public Works- EXHIBIT t A.Engineering Division .1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Re: Fairgrounds Ag Pavilion Dear Mr. Kafer. In accordance with your request, below please find the scope of work and fee proposal for engineering work on the Fairgrounds Ag Pavilion: Scope of Work Roof plan and wind loading calculations - SBS will prepare a drawing depicting the existing roof framing system based on.record plans provided by IRC, SBS will complete one site visit to confirm record drawings represent field conditions, SBS will provide required loading conditions for the components and cladding of the replacement roof system (typically provided in "zones" over the roof area), SBS will provide appropriate. code references and design basis, and SBS will provide specifications for the wind loading requirements of the roof system, and specifications indicating that the contractor must submit Florida Building product approvals on all materials proposed for use on the work—which—meet the loading conditions specified. Tasks.excluded from the scope of work are: an analysis of the existing main wind force resistant system or existing purlins, specifying roof material gauge or fastening schedules — (the Florida Product approval documents provides these specifications), specifying other ancillary work (i.e. gutter, downspouts, etc.), preparing or assisting in the contractor procurement, assisting in the contract administration, inspections or review of product approvals, or assisting in the submittal of bldg. permit plans, other.than to provide signed and sealed drawings.- Time rawings.Time for completion is 45 days from receipt of the Notice to Proceed but no less than 30 days from receipt of record drawings for use in preparation of SBS drawings Fee Proposal _SBS can provide the basic engineering services — roof plan and wind loading calculations - for a lump sum fee of$1,750.00, plus the cost for copies, prints or other similar reimbursable items. This fee is conditioned upon IRC providing record bldg. plans which depict existing roof framing. If these record drawings cannot be provided by IRC, then SBS will charge additional fees to field measure and reproduce the existing roof framing plan required for preparation of these drawings. Please do not hesit a to contact this office should you have any questions. Since' oseph chulke, P:E. t 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD.,SUITE 201,VERO BEACH,FLORIDA 32960 Te.772./770-9622 FAx 772/770-9496 EMAIL infoCsbsengineers.com 59 1 i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM g / TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director C� FROM: Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engine(r,_w SUBJECT: Addendum No. 1 to the Agreement for Old Dixie Highway Sidewalk from 8th Street to SR 60 IRC Project No. 1102, Bid No. 2012052 DATE: December 20, 2012 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On November 13, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners awarded the bid for the Old Dixie Highway Sidewalk from 8th Street to SR60 to Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc. and approved Change Order No. 1 for a total contract price of$329,327.97. This project is federally funded by a Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)Local Agency Program (LAP) grant. The FDOT has requested a modification to the agreement between Timothy Rose Contracting,Inc. and Indian River County to include an updated FHWA 1273 (Required Contract Provisions for Federal-Aid Construction Contracts — revised May 1, 2012) and additional verbiage regarding subcontractors. Addendum No. 1 is to add said changes to the agreement. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available from the FDOT Local Agency Program (LAP) SRTS grant — Optional Sales Tax —31521441-066510-12814- Old Dixie Highway Sidewalk,8th Street to SR 60 in the amount of$329,327.97. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Addendum No. 1 to the original agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute Addendum No. 1 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1102-Old Dixie Hwy Swk 8th St to SR 60-LAP\Admim\agenda items\BCC Agreement O Addendum No. 1 12-19-12.doc Page Two From Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engineer For BCC Agenda January 8, 2013 ATTACHMENTS 1. Addendum No. 1 2. FHWA 1273 revised May 1, 2012 DISTRIBUTION 1. Timothy Rose, President, Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc. 2. Linda Kephart, RCS, FDOT APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: January 80 2013 Indian River Approved Date B County // 2 Administration Budget < <� Legal 2— Public Works Z '26 �z Engineering F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1102-01d Dixie Hwy Swk 8th St to SR 60-LAP\Admim\agenda items\BCC Agreement 61 Addendum No. 112-19-12.doc ADDENDUM NO. 1 to AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 13, 2012 BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING, INC. FOR OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION FROM 8T" STREET TO SR60 moo.. The following shall be added to the Agreement: ARTICLE 8—CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS 8.01 In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: Add the following: K. The Contractor shall perform within its own organization, contract work amounting to not less than forty percent(40%) of the total original contract price, excluding any specialty items designated by the State as indicated in Form FHWA—1273,Section VI—Subletting;or Assigning the Contract which is attached hereto and incorporated herein per Article 9—Contract Documents, Number 17.to this Agreement._ ARTICLE 9—CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 9.01 Contents A. The Contract Documents consist of the following: Add the following: 17. FHWA- 1273(revised May 1, 2012) THE REMAINDER OF THE AGREEMENT, DATED NOVEMBER 13,2012,SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONTRACTOR: Timothy Rose Contracting,Inc. OWNER: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By Joseph E. Flescher,Chairman Title: President BCC Approved Date: Approved as to form and gal su)fdency: Attest: Jeffry R.Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By Yell tAlan Polackwich,County Attorney Deputy Clerk Approved: seph A. aird,County Administrator ( 62 FHWA-1273— Revised May 1,2012 REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISIONS FEDERAL-AID CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS I. General 3. A breach of any of the stipulations contained in these Ii. Nondiscrimination Required Contract Provisions may be sufficient grounds for III. Nonsegregated Facilities withholding of progress payments,withholding of final IV. Davis-Bacon and Related Act Provisions payment,termination of the contract,suspension/debarment V. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act or any other action determined to be appropriate by the Provisions contracting agency and FHWA. VI. Subletting or Assigning the Contract VII. Safety:Accident Prevention 4. Selection of Labor.During the performance of this contract, Vill. False Statements Concerning Highway Projects the contractor shall not use convict labor for any purpose IX. Implementation of Clean Air Act and Federal Water within the limits of a construction project on a Federal-aid X. Compliance with Govemmentwide Suspension and parole,supervised release,or probation. The term Federal-aid Debarment Requirements highway does not include roadways functionally classified as XI. Certification Regarding Use of Contract Funds for local roads or rural minor collectors. Lobbying ATTACHMENTS II. NONDISCRIMINATION A.Employment and Materials Preference for Appalachian The provisions of this section related to 23 CFR Part 230 are Development Highway System or Appalachian Local Access applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all Road Contracts(included in Appalachian contracts only) related construction subcontracts of$10,000 or more. The provisions of 23 CFR Part 230 are not applicable to material supply,engineering,or architectural service contracts. 1. GENERAL In addition,the contractor and all subcontractors must comply 1. Form FHWA-1273 must be physically incorporated in each with the following policies:Executive Order 11246,41 CFR 60, �... construction contract funded under Title 23(excluding 29 CFR 1625-1627,Title 23 USC Section 140,the emergency contracts solely intended for debris removal). The Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended(29 USC 794),Title VI contractor(or subcontractor)must insert this form in each of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,as amended,and related subcontract and further require its inclusion in all lower tier regulations including 49 CFR Parts 21,26 and 27;and 23 CFR subcontracts(excluding purchase orders,rental agreements Parts 200,230,and 633. and other agreements for supplies or services). The contractor and all subcontractors must comply with: the The applicable requirements of Form FHWA-1273 are requirements of the Equal Opportunity Clause in 41 CFR 60- incorporated by reference for work done under any purchase 1.4(b)and,for all construction contracts exceeding$10,000, order,rental agreement or agreement for other services. The the Standard Federal Equal Employment Opportunity prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any Construction Contract Specifications in 41 CFR 60-4.3. subcontractor,lower-tier subcontractor or service provider. Note:The U.S.Department of Labor has exclusive authority to Form FHWA-1273 must be included in all Federal-aid design- determine compliance with Executive Order 11246 and the build contracts,in all subcontracts and in lower tier policies of the Secretary of Labor including 41 CFR 60,and 29 subcontracts(excluding subcontracts for design services, CFR 1625-1627. The contracting agency and the FHWA have purchase orders,rental agreements and other agreements for the authority and the responsibility to ensure compliance with supplies or services). The design-builder shall be responsible Title 23 USC Section 140,the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as for compliance by any subcontractor,lower-tier subcontractor amended(29 USC 794),and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of or service provider. 1964,as amended,and related regulations including 49 CFR Parts 21,26 and 27;and 23 CFR Parts 200,230,and 633. Contracting agencies may reference Form FHWA-1273 in bid proposal or request for proposal documents,however,the The following provision is adopted from 23 CFR 230,Appendix Form FHWA-1273 must be physically incorporated(not A,with appropriate revisions to conform to the U.S. referenced)in all contracts,subcontracts and lower-tier Department of Labor(US DOL)and FHWA requirements. subcontracts(excluding purchase orders,rental agreements and other agreements for supplies or services related to a 1.Equal Employment Opportunity: Equal employment construction contract). opportunity(EEO)requirements not to discriminate and to take affirmative action to assure equal opportunity as set forth 2. Subject to the applicability criteria noted in the following under laws,executive orders,rules,regulations(28 CFR 35, sections,these contract provisions shall apply to all work 29 CFR 1630,29 CFR 1625-1627,41 CFR 60 and 49 CFR 27) performed on the contract by the contractor's own organization and orders of the Secretary of Labor as modified by the and with the assistance of workers under the contractors provisions prescribed herein,and imposed pursuant to 23 immediate superintendence and to all work performed on the U.S.C. 140 shall constitute the EEO and specific affirmative contract by piecework,station work,or by subcontract. action standards for the contractors project activities under 1 63 this contract.The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities 4.Recruitment:When advertising for employees,the Act of 1990(42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.)set forth under 28 CFR contractor will include in all advertisements for employees the 35 and 29 CFR 1630 are incorporated by reference in this notation:"An Equal Opportunity Employer." All such contract.In the execution of this contract,the contractor advertisements will be placed in publications having a large agrees to comply with the following minimum specific circulation among minorities and women in the area from requirement activities of EEO: which the project work force would normally be derived. a.The contractor will work with the contracting agency and a. The contractor will,unless precluded by a valid the Federal Government to ensure that it has made every bargaining agreement,conduct systematic and direct good faith effort to provide equal opportunity with respect to all recruitment through public and private employee referral of its terms and conditions of employment and in their review sources likely to yield qualified minorities and women. To of activities under the contract. meet this requirement,the contractor will identify sources of potential minority group employees,and establish with such b.The contractor will accept as its operating policy the identified sources procedures whereby minority and women following statement: applicants may be referred to the contractor for employment consideration. "It is the policy of this Company to assure that applicants are employed,and that employees are treated during b. In the event the contractor has a valid bargaining employment,without regard to their race,religion,sex,color, agreement providing for exclusive hiring hall referrals,the —UMTLFC1L1Ur-TS-eXpMAUU LU VUS91 V8 1!18 pi UVISIUMII]rbUl Ll IUL employment,upgrading,demotion,or transfer;recruitment or agreement to the extent that the system meets the contractor's recruitment advertising;layoff or termination;rates of pay or compliance with EEO contract provisions. Where other forms of compensation;and selection for training, implementation of such an agreement has the effect of including apprenticeship,pre-apprenticeship,and/or on-the- discriminating against minorities or women,or obligates the job training." contractor to do the same,such implementation violates Federal nondiscrimination provisions. 2. EEO Officer:The contractor will designate and make known to the contracting officers an EEO Officer who will have c. The contractor will encourage its present employees to the responsibility for and must be capable of effectively refer minorities and women as applicants for employment. administering and promoting an active EEO program and who Information and procedures with regard to referring such must be assigned adequate authority and responsibility to do applicants will be discussed with employees. SO. 5.Personnel Actions:Wages,working conditions,and 3. Dissemination of Policy:All members of the contractor's employee benefits shall be established and administered,and staff who are authorized to hire,supervise,promote,and personnel actions of every type,including hiring,upgrading, discharge employees,or who recommend such action,or who promotion,transfer,demotion,layoff,and termination,shall be are substantially involved in such action,will be made fully taken without regard to race,color,religion,sex,national cognizant of,and will implement,the contractor's EEO policy origin,age or disability. The following procedures shall be and contractual responsibilities to provide EEO in each grade followed: and classification of employment. To ensure that the above agreement will be met,the following actions will be taken as a a. The contractor will conduct periodic inspections of project minimum: sites to insure that working conditions and employee facilities do not indicate discriminatory treatment of project site a. Periodic meetings of supervisory and personnel office personnel. employees will be conducted before the start of work and then not less often than once every six months,at which time the b. The contractor will periodically evaluate the spread of contractor's EEO policy and its implementation will be wages paid within each classification to determine any reviewed and explained. The meetings will be conducted by evidence of discriminatory wage practices. the EEO Offices ' c. The contractor will periodically review selected personnel b. All new supervisory or personnel office employees will be actions in depth to determine whether there is evidence of given a thorough indoctrination by the EEO Officer,covering discrimination. Where evidence is found,the contractor will all major aspects of the contractor's EEO obligations within promptly take corrective action. If the review indicates that the thirty days following their reporting for duty with the contractor. discrimination may extend beyond the actions reviewed,such corrective action shall include all affected persons. c. All personnel who are engaged in direct recruitment for the project will be instructed by the EEO Officer in the d. The contractor will promptly investigate all complaints of contractor's procedures for locating and hiring minorities and alleged discrimination made to the contractor in connection women. with its obligations under this contract,will attempt to resolve such complaints,and will take appropriate corrective action d. Notices and posters setting forth the contractor's EEO within a reasonable time. If the investigation indicates that the policy will be placed in areas readily accessible to employees, discrimination may affect persons other than the complainant, applicants for employment and potential employees. such corrective action shall include such other persons. Upon completion of each investigation,the contractor will inform e. The contractor's EEO policy and the procedures to every complainant of all of their avenues of appeal. implement such policy will be brought to the attention of employees by means of meetings,employee handbooks,or 6.Training and Promotion: other appropriate means. a. The contractor will assist in locating,qualifying,and increasing the skills of minorities and women who are 2 64 applicants for employment or current employees. Such efforts with the requirements for and comply with the Americans with should be aimed at developing full journey level status Disabilities Act and all rules and regulations established there employees in the type of trade or job classification involved. under. Employers must provide reasonable accommodation in all employment activities unless to do so would cause an b. Consistent with the contractor's work force requirements undue hardship. and as permissible under Federal and State regulations,the contractor shall make full use of training programs,i.e., 9.Selection of Subcontractors,Procurement of Materials apprenticeship,and on-the-job training programs for the and Leasing of Equipment:The contractor shall not geographical area of contract performance. In the event a discriminate on the grounds of race,color,religion,sex, special provision for training is provided under this contract, national origin,age or disability in the selection and retention this subparagraph will be superseded as indicated in the of subcontractors,including procurement of materials and special provision. The contracting agency may reserve leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary training positions for persons who receive welfare assistance and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the in accordance with 23 U.S.C.140(a). administration of this contract. c. The contractor will advise employees and applicants for a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and employment of available training programs and entrance suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this requirements for each. contract. I he contractor will use good faitrietrorts to ensure promotion potential of employees who are minorities and subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations. women and will encourage eligible employees to apply for such training and promotion. 10.Assurance Required by 49 CFR 25.13(b): 7.Unions: If the contractor relies in whole or in part upon unions as a source of employees,the contractor will use good a. The requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 and the State faith efforts to obtain the cooperation of such unions to DOT's U.S.DOT-approved DBE program are incorporated by increase opportunities for minorities and women. Actions by reference. the contractor,either directly or through a contractor's association acting as agent,will include the procedures set b. The contractor or subcontractor shall not discriminate on forth below: the basis of race,color,national origin,or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out a. The contractor will use good faith efforts to develop,in applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and cooperation with the unions,joint training programs aimed administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the toward qualifying more minorities and women for membership contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach 'r in the unions and increasing the skills of minorities and women of this contract,which may result in the termination of this so that they may qualify for higher paying employment. contract or such other remedy as the contracting agency deems appropriate. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to incorporate an EEO clause into each union agreement to the end that such 11.Records and Reports:The contractor shall keep such union will be contractually bound to refer applicants without records as necessary to document compliance with the EEO regard to their race,color,religion,sex,national origin,age or requirements. Such records shall be retained for a period of disability. three years following the date of the final payment to the contractor for all contract work and shall be available at c. The contractor is to obtain information as to the referral reasonable times and places for inspection by authorized practices and policies of the labor union except that to the representatives of the contracting agency and the FHWA, extent such information is within the exclusive possession of the labor union and such labor union refuses to famish such a. The records kept by the contractor shall document the information to the contractor,the contractor shall so certify to following: the contracting agency and shall set forth what efforts have been made to obtain such information. (1)The number and work hours of minority and non- minority group members and women employed in each work d. In the event the union is unable to provide the contractor classification on the project; with a reasonable flow of referrals within the time limit set forth in the collective bargaining agreement,the contractor will, (2)The progress and efforts being made in cooperation through independent recruitment efforts,fill the employment with unions,when applicable,to increase employment vacancies without regard to race,color,religion,sex,national opportunities for minorities and women;and origin,age or disability;making full efforts to obtain qualified and/or qualifiable minorities and women. The failure of a union (3)The progress and efforts being made in locating,hiring, to provide sufficient referrals(even though it is obligated to training,qualifying,and upgrading minorities and women; provide exclusive referrals under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement)does not relieve the contractor from the b. The contractors and subcontractors will submit an annual requirements of this paragraph. In the event the union referral report to the contracting agency each July for the duration of practice prevents the contractor from meeting the obligations the project,indicating the number of minority,women,and pursuant to Executive Order 11246,as amended,and these non-minority group employees currently engaged in each work special provisions,such contractor shall immediately notify the classification required by the contract work. This information is contracting agency. to be reported on Form FHWA-1391. The staffing data should represent the project work force on board in all or any part of 8. Reasonable Accommodation for Applicants/ the last payroll period preceding the end of July. If on-the-job ` Employees with Disabilities: The contractor must be familiar training is being required by special provision,the contractor 3 65 .,�,. will be required to collect and report training data. The of paragraph'1.d.of this section;also,regular contributions employment data should reflect the work force on board during made or costs incurred for more than a weekly period(but not all or any part of the last payroll period preceding the end of less often than quarterly)under plans,funds,or programs July. which cover the particular weekly period,are deemed to be constructively made or incurred during such weekly period. Such laborers and mechanics shall be paid the appropriate Ill.NONSEGREGATED FACILITIES wage rate and fringe benefits on the wage determination for the classification of work actually performed,without regard to This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction skill,except as provided in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(4).Laborers or contracts and to all related construction subcontracts of mechanics performing work in more than one classification $10,000 or more. may be compensated at the rate specified for each classification for the time actually worked therein:Provided, The contractor must ensure that facilities provided for That the employer's payroll records accurately set forth the employees are provided in such a manner that segregation on time spent in each classification in which work is performed. the basis of race,color,religion,sex,or national origin cannot The wage determination(including any additional classification result. The contractor may neither require such segregated and wage rates conformed under paragraph 1.b.of this use by written or oral policies nor tolerate such use by section)and the Davis-Bacon poster(WH-1321)shall be employee custom. The contractor's obligation extends further posted at all times by the contractor and its subcontractors at to ensure that its employees are not assigned to perform their the site of the work in a prominent and accessible place where the facilities are segregated. The term"facilities"includes waiting rooms,work areas,restaurants and other eating areas, b.(1)The contracting officer shall require that any class of time clocks,restrooms,washrooms,locker rooms,and other laborers or mechanics,including helpers,which is not listed in storage or dressing areas,parking lots,drinking fountains, the wage determination and which is to be employed under the recreation or entertainment areas,transportation,and housing contract shall be classified in conformance with the wage provided for employees. The contractor shall provide separate determination.The contracting officer shall approve an or single-user restrooms and necessary dressing or sleeping additional classification and wage rate and fringe benefits areas to assure privacy between sexes. therefore only when the following criteria have been met: IV. DAVIS-BACON AND RELATED ACT PROVISIONS (i)The work to be performed by the classification requested is not performed by a classification in the wage This section is applicable to all Federal-aid construction determination;and projects exceeding$2,000 and to all related subcontracts and lower-tier subcontracts(regardless of subcontract size). The (ii)The classification is utilized in the area by the requirements apply to all projects located within the right-of- construction industry;and way of a roadway that is functionally classified as Federal-aid highway. This excludes roadways functionally classified as (iii)The proposed wage rate,including any bona fide local roads or rural minor collectors,which are exempt fringe benefits,bears a reasonable relationship to the Contracting agencies may elect to apply these requirements to wage rates contained in the wage determination. other projects. The following provisions are from the U.S.Department of (2)If the contractor and the laborers and mechanics to be employed Labor regulations in 29 CFR 5.5"Contract provisions and in the classification known),or their related matters"with minor revisions to conform to the FHWA- representatives,and the contracting officer agree on the 1273 format and FHWA program requirements. classification and wage rate(including the amount designated for fringe benefits where appropriate),a report of the action taken shall be sent by the contracting officer to the 1. Minimum wages Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division,Employment Standards Administration,U.S.Department of Labor, a. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon Washington,DC 20210.The Administrator,or an authorized the site of the work,will be paid unconditionally and not less representative,will approve,modify,or disapprove every often than once a week,and without subsequent deduction or additional classification action within 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or will notify the contracting rebate on any account(except such payroll deductions are officer within the 30-day period that additional time is permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Laboorr necessary. under the Copeland Act(29 CFR part 3)),the full amount of wages and bona fide fringe benefits(or cash equivalents thereof)due at time of payment computed at rates not less (3)In the event the contractor,the laborers or mechanics than those contained in the wage determination of the to be employed in the classification or their representatives, Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part and the contracting officer do not agree on the proposed hereof,regardless of any contractual relationship which may classification and wage rate(including the amount be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers designated for fringe benefits,where appropriate),the and mechanics. contracting officer shall refer the questions,including the views of all interested parties and the recommendation of the Contributions made or costs reasonably anticipated for bona contracting officer,to the Wage and Hour Administrator for fide fringe benefits under section 1(b)(2)of the Davis-Bacon determination.The Wage and Hour Administrator,or an Act on behalf of laborers or mechanics are considered wages authorized representative,will issue a determination within paid to such laborers or mechanics,subject to the provisions 30 days of receipt and so advise the contracting officer or 4 66 will notify the contracting officer within the 30-day period that Bacon Act,the contractor shall maintain records which show additional time is necessary. that the commitment to provide such benefits is enforceable, that the plan or program is financially responsible,and that the plan or program has been communicated in writing to the (4)The wage rate(including fringe benefits where laborers or mechanics affected,and records which show the appropriate)determined pursuant to paragraphs 1.b.(2)or costs anticipated or the actual cost incurred in providing such 1.b.(3)of this section,shall be paid to all workers performing benefits.Contractors employing apprentices or trainees under work in the classification under this contract from the first approved programs shall maintain written evidence of the day on which work is performed in the classification. registration of apprenticeship programs and certification of trainee programs,the registration of the apprentices and c.Whenever the minimum wage rate prescribed in the trainees,and the ratios and wage rates prescribed in the contract for a class of laborers or mechanics includes a fringe applicable programs. benefit which is not expressed as an hourly rate,the contractor shall either pay the benefit as stated in the wage determination b.(1)The contractor shall submit weekly for each week in or shall pay another bona fide fringe benefit or an hourly cash which any contract work is performed a copy of all payrolls to equivalent thereof. the contracting agency. The payrolls submitted shall set out accurately and completely all of the information required to be d.If the contractor does not make payments to a trustee or maintained under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(i),except that full social E!b9E!hiEdP@FRRR the QQntFAQE. wages of any laborer or mechanic the amount of any costs on weekly transmittals.Instead the payrolls shall only need to reasonably anticipated in providing bona fide fringe benefits include an individually identifying number for each employee under a plan or program,Provided,That the Secretary of e.g.,the last four digits of the employee's social security Labor has found,upon the written request of the contractor, number).The required weekly payroll information may be that the applicable standards of the Davis-Bacon Act have submitted in any form desired.Optional Form WH-347 is been met.The Secretary of Labor may require the contractor available for this purpose from the Wage and Hour Division to set aside in a separate account assets for the meeting of Web site at http://www.dol.govlesa/whd/forms/Wh347instr.htm obligations under the plan or program. or its successor site.The prime contractor is responsible for the submission of copies of payrolls by all subcontractors. Contractors and subcontractors shall maintain the full social 2. Withholding security number and current address of each covered worker, and shall provide them upon request to the contracting agency The contracting agency shall upon its own action or upon for transmission to the State DOT,the FHWA or the Wage and written request of an authorized representative of the Hour Division of the Department of Labor for purposes of an Department of Labor,withhold or cause to be withheld from investigation or audit of compliance with prevailing wage r,f,,,, the contractor under this contract,or any other Federal requirements.It is not a violation of this section for a prime contract with the same prime contractor,or any other federally- contractor to require a subcontractor to provide addresses and assisted contract subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing wage social security numbers to the prime contractor for its own requirements,which is held by the same prime contractor,so records,without weekly submission to the contracting agency.. much of the accrued payments or advances as may be considered necessary to pay laborers and mechanics, (2)Each payroll submitted shall be accompanied by a including apprentices,trainees,and helpers,employed by the "Statement of Compliance,"signed by the contractor or contractor or any subcontractor the full amount of wages subcontractor or his or her agent who pays or supervises the required by the contract. In the event of failure to pay any payment of the persons employed under the contract and shall laborer or mechanic,including any apprentice,trainee,or certify the following: helper,employed or working on the site of the work,all or part of the wages required by the contract,the contracting agency may,after written notice to the contractor,take such action as (i)That the payroll for the payroll period contains the may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further information required to be provided under§5.5(a)(3)(ii),of payment,advance,or guarantee of funds until such violations Regulations,29 CFR part 5,the appropriate information is have ceased. being maintained under§5.5(a)(3)()of Regulations,29 CFR part 5,and that such information is correct and 3. Payrolls and basic records complete; (ii)That each laborer or mechanic(including each a. Payrolls and basic records relating thereto shall be helper,apprentice,and trainee)employed on the contract maintained by the contractor during the course of the work and during the payroll period has been paid the full weekly preserved for a period of three years thereafter for all laborers wages earned,without rebate,either directly or indirectly, and mechanics working at the site of the work.Such records and that no deductions have been made either directly or shall contain the name,address,and social security number of indirectly from the full wages earned,other than each such worker,his or her correct classification,hourly rates permissible deductions as set forth in Regulations,29 CFR of wages paid(including rates of contributions or costs part 3; anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits or cash equivalents thereof of the types described in section 1(b)(2)(B)of the Davis-Bacon Act),daily and weekly number of hours worked, (iii)That each laborer or mechanic has been paid not deductions made and actual wages paid.Whenever the less than the applicable wage rates and fringe benefits or Secretary of Labor has found under 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(iv)that cash equivalents for the classification of work performed, the wages of any laborer or mechanic include the amount of as specified in the applicable wage determination any costs reasonably anticipated in providing benefits under a incorporated into the contract. plan or program described in section 1(b)(2)(B)of the Davis- 5 67 �,... (3)The weekly submission of a properly executed rate specified in the applicable wage determination. certification set forth on the reverse side of Optional Form Apprentices shall be paid fringe benefits in accordance with WH-347 shall satisfy the requirement for submission of the the provisions of the apprenticeship program.If the "Statement of Compliance"required by paragraph 3.b.(2)of apprenticeship program does not specify fringe benefits, this section. apprentices must be paid the full amount of fringe benefits listed on the wage determination for the applicable (4)The falsification of any of the above certifications may classification.If the Administrator determines that a different subject the contractor or subcontractor to civil or criminal practice prevails for the applicable apprentice classification, prosecution under section 1001 of title 18 and section 231 of fringes shall be paid in accordance with that determination. title 31 of the United States Code. In the event the Office of Apprenticeship Training,Employer c.The contractor or subcontractor shall make the records and Labor Services,or a State Apprenticeship Agency required under paragraph 3.a.of this section available for recognized by the Office,withdraws approval of an inspection,copying,or transcription by authorized apprenticeship program,the contractor will no longer be representatives of the contracting agency,the State DOT,the permitted to utilize apprentices at less than the applicable FHWA, or the Department of Labor,and shall permit such predetermined rate for the work performed until an acceptable representatives to interview employees during working hours program is approved. on the job.If the contractor or subcontractor fails to submit the loqui after written notice to the contractor,the contracting agency or the State DOT,take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of any further payment,advance,or Except as provided in 29 CFR 5.16,trainees will not be guarantee of funds.Furthermore,failure to submit the required permitted to work at less than the predetermined rate for the records upon request or to make such records available may work performed unless they are employed pursuant to and be grounds for debarment action pursuant to 29 CFR 5.12. individually registered in a program which has received prior approval,evidenced by formal certification by the U.S. Department of Labor,Employment and Training 4. Apprentices and trainees Administration. a.Apprentices(programs of the USDOL). The ratio of trainees to journeymen on the job site shall not be greater than permitted under the plan approved by the Apprentices will be permitted to work at less than the Employment and Training Administration. predetermined rate for the work they performed when they are .,, employed pursuant to and individually registered in a bona fide Every trainee must be paid at not less than the rate specified apprenticeship program registered with the U.S.Department of in the approved program for the trainee's level of progress, Labor,Employment and Training Administration,Office of expressed as a percentage of the journeyman hourly rate Apprenticeship Training,Employer and Labor Services,or with specified in the applicable wage determination.Trainees shall a State Apprenticeship Agency recognized by the Office,or if'a be paid fringe benefits in accordance with the provisions of the person is employed in his or her first 90 days of probationary trainee program.If the trainee program does not mention employment as an apprentice in such an apprenticeship fringe benefits,trainees shall be paid the full amount of fringe program,who is not individually registered in the program,but benefits listed on the wage determination unless the who has been certified by the Office of Apprenticeship Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division determines that Training,Employer and Labor Services or a State there is an apprenticeship program associated with the Apprenticeship Agency(where appropriate)to be eligible for corresponding journeyman wage rate on the wage probationary employment as an apprentice. determination which provides for less than full fringe benefits for apprentices.Any employee listed on the payroll at a trainee The allowable ratio of apprentices to journeymen on the job rate who is not registered and participating in a training plan site in any craft classification shall not be greater than the ratio approved by the Employment and Training Administration shall permitted to the contractor as to the entire work force under be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the wage the registered program.Any worker listed on a payroll at an determination for the classification of work actually performed. apprentice wage rate,who is not registered or otherwise In addition,any trainee performing work on the job site in employed as stated above,shall be paid not less than the excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program applicable wage rate on the wage determination for the shall be paid not less than the applicable wage rate on the classification of work actually performed.In addition,any Wage determination for the work actually performed. apprentice performing work on the job site in excess of the ratio permitted under the registered program shall be paid not In the event the Employment and Training Administration less than the applicable wage rate on the wage determination withdraws approval of a training program,the contractor will no for the work actually performed.Where a contractor is longer be permitted to utilize trainees at less than the performing construction on a project in a locality other than applicable predetermined rate for the work performed until an that in which its program is registered,the ratios and wage acceptable program is approved. rates(expressed in percentages of the journeyman's hourly rate)specified in the contractor's or subcontractor's registered program shall be observed. c.Equal employment opportunity.The utilization of apprentices,trainees and journeymen under this part shall be Eve a in conformity with the equal employment opportunity ry pprentice must be paid at not less than the rate requirements of Executive Order 11246,as amended,and 29 specified in the registered program for the apprentice's level of CFR part 30. progress,expressed as a percentage of the journeymen hourly 6 68 ter. d. Apprentices and Trainees(programs of the U.S.DOT). Apprentices and trainees working under apprenticeship and V. CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY skill training programs which have been certified by the STANDARDS ACT Secretary of Transportation as promoting EEO in connection with Federal-aid highway construction programs are not The following clauses apply to any Federal-aid construction subject to the requirements of paragraph 4 of this Section IV. contract in an amount in excess of$100,000 and subject to the The straight time hourly wage rates for apprentices and overtime provisions of the Contract Work Hours and Safety trainees under such programs will be established by the Standards Act.These clauses shall be inserted in addition to particular programs.The ratio of apprentices and trainees to the clauses required by 29 CFR 5.5(a)or 29 CFR 4.6. As journeymen shall not be greater than permitted by the terms of used in this paragraph,the terms laborers and mechanics the particular program. include watchmen and guards. 5.Compliance with Copeland Act requirements. The 1.Overtime requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contractor shall comply with the requirements of 29 CFR part contractingfor an t he contractork which may 3,which are incorporated by reference in this contract. or involve the employment of laborers o mechanics ashall quire require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to Form FHWA-1273 in any subcontracts and also require the o in excess o o ours in suc wOrM-eak unless suc subcontractors to include Form FHWA 1273 in any lower tier laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less subcontracts.The prime contractor shall be responsible for the than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek. with all the contract clauses in 29 CFR 5.5. 2.Violation;liability for unpaid wages;liquidated 7.Contract termination:debarment. A breach of the damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth contract clauses in 29 CFR 5.5 may be grounds for termination in paragraph(1.)of this section,the contractor and any of the contract,and for debarment as a contractor and a subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the subcontractor as provided in 29 CFR 5.12. unpaid wages.In addition,such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States(in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory,to such 8.Compliance with.Davis-Bacon and Related Act District or to such territory),for liquidated damages.Such requirements. All rulings and interpretations of the Davis- liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each Bacon and Related Acts contained in 29 CFR parts 1,3,and 5 individual laborer or mechanic,including watchmen and `vr are herein incorporated by reference in this contract. guards,employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph(1.)of this section,in the sum of$10 for each 9.Disputes concerning labor standards.Disputes arising calendar day on which such individual was required or out of the labor standards provisions of this contract shall not permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty be subject to the general disputes clause of this contract.Such hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the disputes shall be resolved in accordance with the procedures clause set forth in paragraph(1.)of this section_. of the Department of Labor set forth in 29 CFR parts 5,6,and 7.Disputes within the meaning of this clause include disputes 3.Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. between the contractor(or any of its subcontractors)and the The FHWA or the contacting agency shall upon its own action contracting agency,the U.S.Department of Labor,or the or upon written request of an authorized representative of the employees or their representatives. Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld,from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the 10.Certification of eligibility. contractor or subcontractor under any such contract or any other Federal contract with the same prime contractor,or any othubjectthe Contract W a.By entering into this contract,the contractor certifies that Hors andrSafety Sta dardsract Actswhich isoheld by the same neither it(nor he or she)nor any person or firm who has an prime contractor,such sums as may be determined to be interest in the contractor's firm is a person or firm ineligible to necessary to satisfy any liabilities of such contractor or be awarded Government contracts by virtue of section 3(a)of subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1). provided in the clause set forth in paragraph(2.)of this section. b.No part of this contract shall be subcontracted to any person or firm ineligible for award of a Government contract by virtue 4.Subcontracts. The contractor or subcontractor shall insert of section 3(a)of the Davis-Bacon Act or 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1). in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraph(1.) through(4.)of this section and also a clause requiring the c.The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier U.S.Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C. 1001. subcontracts.The prime contractor shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs(1.)through(4.)of this section. 7 69 '*s... VI.SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING THE CONTRACT evidenced in writing and that it contains all pertinent provisions and requirements of the prime contract. This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction 5.The 30%self-performance requirement of paragraph(1)is contracts on the National Highway System. not applicable to design-build contracts;however,contracting 1.The contractor shall perform with its own organization agencies may establish their own self-performance requirements. contract work amounting to not less than 30 percent(ora greater percentage if specified elsewhere in the contract)of the total original contract price,excluding any specialty items VII.SAFETY:ACCIDENT PREVENTION designated by the contracting agency. Specialty items may be performed by subcontract and the amount of any such This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction specialty items performed may be deducted from the total contracts and to all related subcontracts. original contract price before computing the amount of work required to be performed by the contractor's own organization 1. In the performance of this contract the contractor shall (23 CFR 635.116). comply with all applicable Federal,State,and local laws governing safety,health,and sanitation(23 CFR 635).The a. The term"perform work with its own organization"refers contractor shall provide all safeguards,safety devices and to workers employed or leased by the prime contractor,and protective equipment and take an other needed actions as it without operators. Such term does not include employees or reasonably necessary to protect thlife and health of equipment of a subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor, employees on the job and the safety of the public and to agents of the prime contractor,or any other assignees. The protect property in connection with the performance of the term may include payments for he costs of hiring leased work covered by the contract. employees from an employee leasing firm meeting all relevant Federal and State regulatory requirements. Leased 2. It is a condition of this contract,and shall be made a employees may only be included in this term if the prime condition of each subcontract,which he contractor enters into contractor meets all of the following conditions: pursuant to this contract,that the contractor and any subcontractor shall not permit any employee,in performance (1)the prime contractor maintains control over the of the contract,to work in surroundings or under conditions supervision of the day-today activities of the leased which are unsanitary,hazardous or dangerous to his/her employees; health or safety,as determined under construction safety and (2)the prime contractor remains responsible for the quality health standards(29 CFR 1926)promulgated by the Secretary of the work of the leased employees; of Labor,in accordance with Section 107 of the Contract Work (3)the prime contractor retains all power to accept or Hours and Safety Standards Act(40 U.S.C.3704). Now- exclude individual employees from work on the project;and (4)the prime contractor remains ultimately responsible for 3.Pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.3,it is a condition of this contract the payment of predetermined minimum wages,the that the Secretary of Labor or authorized representative submission of payrolls,statements of compliance and all thereof,shall have right of entry to any site of contract other Federal regulatory requirements. performance to inspect or investigate the matter of compliance with the tion safety and health standards and b."Specialty Items"shall be construed to be limited to work out the duties of he Secretary under Section 107 of heo carry. that requires highly specialized knowledge,abilities,or Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act(40 equipment not ordinarily available in the type of contracting U.S.C.3704). organizations qualified and expected to bid or propose on the contract as a whole and in general are to be limited to minor components of the overall contract. VIII.FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING HIGHWAY 2.The contract amount upon which the requirements set forth PROJECTS in paragraph(1)of Section VI is computed includes he cost of This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction material and manufactured products which are to be contracts and to all related subcontracts. purchased or produced by he contractor under the contract provisions. In order to assure high quality and durable construction in conformity with approved plans and specifications and a high 3.The contractor shall furnish(a)a competent superintendent degree of reliability on statements and representations made or supervisor who is employed by the firm,has full authority to by engineers,contractors,suppliers,and workers on Federal- direct performance of the work in accordance with the contract aid highway projects,it is essential that all persons concerned requirements,and is in charge of all construction operations with the project perform their functions as carefully,thoroughly, (regardless of who performs the work)and(b)such other of its and honestly as possible. Willful falsification,distortion,or own organizational resources(supervision,management,and misrepresentation with respect to any facts related to the engineering services)as the contracting officer determines is project is a violation of Federal law. To prevent any necessary to assure the performance of the contract misunderstanding regarding the seriousness of these and similar acts,Form FHWA-1022 shall be posted on each 4.No portion of the contract shall be sublet,assigned or Federal-aid highway project(23 CFR 635)in one or more otherwise disposed of except with the written consent of the places where it is readily available to all persons concerned contracting officer,or authorized representative,and such with the project: consent when given shall not be construed to relieve the contractor of any responsibility for the fulfillment of the contract. Written consent will be given only after the 18 U.S.C.1020 reads as follows: _,, contracting agency has assured that each subcontract is 8 70 'Whoever,being an officer,agent,or employee of the United covered transaction.The prospective first tier participant shall States,or of any State or Territory,or whoever,whether a submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification person,association,firm,or corporation,knowingly makes any set out below.The certification or explanation will be false statement,false representation,or false report as to the considered in connection with the department or agency s character,quality,quantity,or cost of the material used or to determination whether to enter into this transaction.However, be used,or the quantity or quality of the work performed or to failure of the prospective first tier participant to furnish a be performed,or the cost thereof in connection with the certification or an explanation shall disqualify such a person submission of plans,maps,specifications,contracts,or costs from participation in this transaction. of construction on any highway or related project submitted for approval to the Secretary of Transportation;or c.The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the contracting Whoever knowingly makes any false statement,false agency determined to enter into this transaction.If it is later representation,false report or false claim with respect to the determined that the prospective participant knowingly rendered character,quality,quantity,or cost of any work performed or to an erroneous certification,in addition to other remedies be performed,or materials furnished or to be furnished,in available to the Federal Government,the contracting agency connection with the construction of any highway or related may terminate this transaction for cause of default project approved by the Secretary of Transportation;or d.The first tier participant shall ive Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or false immediate writtentnotice to the contracting agencyrde to whom or report submitted pursuant to provisions of the Federal-aid participant learns that its certification was erroneous when�er Roads Act approved July 1,1916,(39 Stat.355),as amended submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed and supplemented; circumstances. Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 e.The terms"covered transaction,""debarred," years or both." "suspended,""ineligible,""participant,""person," "principal," and"voluntarily excluded,"as used in this clause,are defined in 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200. "First Tier Covered IX.IMPLEMENTATION OF CLEAN AIR ACT AND FEDERAL Transactions"refers to any covered transaction between a WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT grantee or subgrantee of Federal funds and a participant(such as the prime or general contract). "Lower Tier Covered This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction Transactions"refers to any covered transaction under a First contracts and to all related subcontracts. Tier Covered Transaction(such as subcontracts). "First Tier Participant"refers to the participant who has entered into a By submission of this bid/proposal or the execution of this covered transaction with a grantee or subgrantee of Federal contract,or subcontract,as appropriate,the bidder,proposer, funds(such as the prime or general contractor). "Lower Tier Federal-aid construction contractor,or subcontractor,as Participant"refers any participant who has entered into a appropriate,will be deemed to have stipulated as follows: covered transaction with a First Tier Participant or other Lower 1.That any person who is or will be utilized in the Tier Participants(such as subcontractors and suppliers). performance of this contract is not prohibited from receiving an f.The prospective first tier participant agrees by submitting award due to a violation of Section 508 of the Clean Water Act this proposal that,should the proposed covered transaction be or Section 306 of the Clean Air Act. entered into,it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier 2.That the contractor agrees to include or cause to be covered transaction with a person who is debarred, included the requirements of paragraph(1)of this Section X in suspended,declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from every subcontract,and further agrees to take such action as participation in this covered transaction,unless authorized by the contracting agency may direct as a means of enforcing the department or agency entering into this transaction. such requirements. g.The prospective first tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled X.CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, "Certification Regarding Debarment,Suspension,Ineligibility SUSPENSION,INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transactions,' EXCLUSION provided by the department or contracting agency,entering into this covered transaction,without modification,in all lower This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier contracts,design-build contracts,subcontracts,lower-tier covered transactions exceeding the$25,000 threshold. subcontracts, purchase orders,lease agreements,consultant contracts or any other covered transaction requiring FHWA h.A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a approval or that is estimated to cost$25,000 or more— as certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered defined in 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200. transaction that is not debarred,suspended,ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction,unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is for that its rincipls are not responsib 1.Instructions for Certification—First Tier Participants: debarred,for otherwise ineligible ensuringto partic paten covered suspended, transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals,as well as a.By signing and submitting this proposal,the prospective the eligibility of any lower tier prospective participants,each first tier participant is providing the certification set out below. participant may,but is not required to,check the Excluded Parties List System website(httosJ/www eels oov/),which is b.The inability of a person to provide the certification set out compiled by the General Services Administration. below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this 9 71 i. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, require the establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. including suspension and/or debarment. The knowledge and information of the prospective participant C.The prospective lower tier participant shall provide is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings, submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant teams that its certification was erroneous by reason of j.Except for transactions authorized under paragraph(f)of changed circumstances. these instructions,if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended,debarred,ineligible,or voluntarilyd.The terms"covered transaction,""debarred," "suspended,""ineligible,""participant,,""person,""principal," excluded from participation in this transaction,in addition to and"voluntarily excluded,"as used in this clause,are defined other remedies available to the Federal Government,the in 2 CFR Parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause which this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a or default. copy of those regulations. `First Tier Covered Transactions" refers to any covered transaction between a grantee or subgrantee of Federal funds and a participant(such as the 2. Certification Regarding Debarment Suspension, Prime or general contract). "Lower Tier Covered Transactions" refers to any covered transaction under a First Tier Covered Participants: refers to the participant who has entered into a coveredubgrantee n a. The prospective first tier participant certifies to the best of (such as the prime org neral contractor).of Lower Tier Fedel funds its knowledge and belief,that it and its principals: Participant"refers any participant who has entered into a on with a First Tier Participant or other (1) Are not presently debarred,suspended,proposed for Tier Particip Pacovred rticipants((such assubcontractors and suppliers),Lower debarment,declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal e.The prospective lower tier participant agrees by department or agency; submitting this proposal that,should the proposed covered transaction be entered into,it shall not knowingly enter into (2) Have not within a three-year period preceding this any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered debarred,suspended,declared ineligible,or voluntarily against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in excluded from participation in this covered transaction,unless connection with obtaining,attempting to obtain,or performing authorized by the department or agency with which this a public(Federal,State or local)transaction or contract under transaction originated. a public transaction;violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement,theft,forgery, f.The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by bribery,falsification or destruction of records,making false submitting this proposal that it will include this clause titled statements,or receiving stolen property, "Certification Regarding Debarment,Suspension,Ineligibility and Voluntary (3) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or without modification,in all lower tier covered transa t o'ns and civilly charged by a governmental entity(Federal,State or in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions exceeding local)with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in the$25,000 threshold. paragraph(a)(2)of this certification;and (4) Have not within athree-year eriod recedin this g•A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a tier application/proposal had one or more public transactions transaction that s notdebartification of a prosectivrred, uspended,participant in alower ineligible,or covered (Federal,State or local)terminated for cause or default. voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction,unless it knows that the certification is erroneous.A participant is b. Where the prospective participant is unable to certify to responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, any of the statements in this certification,such prospective debarred,or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals,as well as 2.Instructions for Certification-Lower Tier Participants: the eligibility of any lower tier prospective participants,each P participant may,but is not required to,check the Excluded Parties List System website(httos://www.eols Qov/),which is (Applicable to all subcontracts,purchase orders and other compiled by the General Services Administration. lower tier transactions requiring prior FHWA approval or estimated to cost$25,000 or more-2 CFR Parts 180 and h.Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to 1200) require establishment of a system of records in.order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause.The a.By signing and submitting this proposal,the prospective knowledge and information of participant is not required,to lower tier is providing the certification set out below. exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person b.The certification in this clause is a material representation in the ordinary course of business dealings. of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction i.Except for transactions authorized under paragraph a of was entered into.If it is later determined that the prospective these instructions,if a participant in a covered transaction lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a certification,in addition to other remedies available to the person who is suspended,debarred,ineligible,or voluntarily Federal Government,the department,or agency with which excluded from participation in this transaction,in addition to .... other remedies available to the Federal Government,the 10 72 �.. department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies,including suspension and/or debarment. Certification Regarding Debarment,Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Participants: 1.The prospective lower tier participant certifies,by submission of this proposal,that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred,suspended,proposed for debarment, declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency. 2.Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this XI,CERTIFICATION REGARDING USE OF CONTRACT FUNDS FOR LOBBYING This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts which exceed $100,000(49 CFR 20). 1.The prospective participant certifies,by signing and submitting this bid or proposal,to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that: a.No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be wr paid,by or on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract,the making of any Federal grant,the making of any Federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,continuation,renewal,amendment,or modification of any Federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement. b.If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency,a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL,"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,"in accordance with its instructions. 2.This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than$100,000 for each such failure. 3.The prospective participant also agrees by submitting its bid or proposal that the participant shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts,which exceed$100,000 and that all such recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. 11 73 .. ATTACHMENT A-EMPLOYMENT AND MATERIALS 6.The contractor shall include the provisions of Sections 1 PREFERENCE FOR APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT through 4 of this Attachment A in every subcontract for work HIGHWAY SYSTEM OR APPALACHIAN LOCAL ACCESS which is,or reasonably may be,done as on-site work. ROAD CONTRACTS This provision is applicable to all Federal-aid projects funded under the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965. 1.During the performance of this contract,the contractor undertaking to do work which is,or reasonably may be,done as on-site work,shall give preference to qualified persons who regularly reside in the labor area as designated by the DOL wherein the contract work is situated,or the subregion,or the Appalachian counties of the State wherein the contract work is situated,except: a.To the extent that qualified persons regularly residing in the area are not available. b.For the reasonable needs of the contractor to employ ._.__ _. _ Y __.s6piI .....1..v.....i E !! claulnlc111Cl:CJJdIy assure an efficient execution of the contract work. c.For the obligation of the contractor to offer employment to present or former employees as the result of a lawful collective bargaining contract,provided that the number of nonresident persons employed under this subparagraph(1 c)shall not exceed 20 percent of the total number of employees employed by the contractor on the contract work,except as provided in subparagraph(4)below. 2.The contractor shall place a job order with the State Employment Service indicating(a)the classifications of the laborers,mechanics and other employees required to perform the contract work,(b)the number of employees required in each classification,(c)the date on which the participant estimates such employees will be required,and(d)any other pertinent information required by the State Employment Service to complete the job order form. The job order may be placed with the State Employment Service in writing or by telephone. If during the course of the contract work,the information submitted by the contractor in the original job order is substantially modified,the participant shall promptly notify the State Employment Service. 3.The contractor shall give full consideration to all qualified job applicants referred to him by the State Employment Service. The contractor is not required to grant employment to any job applicants who,in his opinion,are not qualified to perform the classification of work required. 4.If,within one week following the placing of a job order by the contractor with the State Employment Service,the State Employment Service is unable to refer any qualified job applicants to the contractor,or less than the number requested,the State Employment Service will forward a certificate to the contractor indicating the unavailability of applicants. Such certificate shall be made a part of the contractor's permanent project records. Upon receipt of this certificate,the contractor may employ persons who do not normally reside in the labor area to fill positions covered by the certificate,notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraph(1c) above. 5. The provisions of 23 CFR 633.207(e)allow the contracting agency to provide a contractual preference for the use of mineral resource materials native to the Appalachian region. 12 74 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION C a REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Robert L. Smith ADDRESS: 2451 N.Seacrest Blvd., Boynton Beach, FI 33435 PHONE: 561-880-7094 SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: 438038 1h Avenue, Building Formerly Known As Greenleaf Bar IS A PRESENTATION PLANNED? YES a NO IS BACK-UP BEING PROVIDED YES NO IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION X� YES NO WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU Initiate a change to the non-conformities regulations to eliminate the REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? one year cessation of use rule for property(re-establish grandfathered-in status) ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? YES NO WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form X E-Mail COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Fax Joseph A. Baird Mail Hand Delivered MEETING DATE: ef. Phone llocumenQ Board Approved 11/7/06 75 Dori Roy `rorn: Stan Boling [sboling@ircgov.com] it: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 1:25 PM ""ru: Bob Keating; Bill Debraal Cc: Alan Polackwich; Dori Roy Subject: FW: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD MEETING:01-08-13 From: Deliverance holy Temple [_mailto:dht2001now(ayahoo com] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 12:34 PM To: Stan Boling Subject: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD MEETING:01-08-13 Stan Boling, Director Planning Division RE: 4380 38th AVENUE (32-39-27-00000-3000-00006.0 Building formally used as the Greenleaf Bar "''ase accept this as my official request to appear before the and of County Commissioners on January 8, 2013. This appearance is to request that the Board initiate a change to the non-conformities regulations to eliminate the one year cessation of use rule (re-establish grandfathered-in status) for the property named above. Thank you. Robert L. Smith 2451 N. Seacrest Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561)880-7094 i 76 COMMUNITY i DEVELOPMENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A Baird; County Administrator DE TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert]mating, AIC ; Co ity Development Director FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: December 17, 2012 SUBJECT: Consideration of Meeting Dates for Proposed Amendments to the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to Allow Outdoor Vehicle Storage Use in the CL (Limited Commercial) and CG (General Commercial) Zoning Districts It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 8, 2013. BACKGROUND At its meeting of September 11, 2012, George Sigler appeared before the Board of County Commissioners (Board) and requested that the county change its land development regulations (LDRs) to allow paved or unpaved outdoor vehicle storage as an allowed use in the CL (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Currently, Mr. Sigler owns CL-zoned property located at the southwest corner of 27th Avenue SW and 6th Street SW, and wishes to develop an outdoor vehicle storage use on that site. During discussion at the September 11th meeting, the Board directed staff to evaluate allowing outdoor vehicle storage in the CL district under special conditions. Such special conditions could involve designating outdoor vehicle storage as a special exception use. In response to the Board's direction, staff met with Mr. Sigler, surveyed outdoor vehicle storage regulations of other local governments, analyzed Indian River County's existing regulations, and reported back to the Board. At its October 23, 2012 meeting, the Board considered staff's analysis and directed staff to initiate amendments to the LDRs to allow outdoor vehicle storage in the CL and CG districts as a special exception use, subject to 6 criteria provided in staff's analysis. In addition, the Board directed staff to revisit the county's existing limitation on the length of recreational vehicles stored outside on individual residential properties. `-- Staff has now drafted an LDR amendment ordinance as directed by the Board. Because some of the proposed amendments will change the actual list of permitted or conditional uses in certain FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2012 BCC\LDR hearing dates Outdoor.doe 1 77 zoning districts, Florida Statutes Chapter 125.66 requires that the local governing board hold two hearings on the proposed LDR amendments, and those hearings must be held at least 10 days apart. Florida Statutes also provide that one hearing be held after 5:00 p.m., while the other hearing may be held before 5:00 p.m. (e.g. regular Board meeting time). The statutes also state that, with 4 or 5 positive votes, the Board could vote to hold both LDR hearings before 5:00 p.m., such as at regular Tuesday morning Board meetings. To proceed with the review and approval process for the subject LDR amendments, the Board must now set dates and times for the required two public hearings. ANALYSIS: As proposed, the amendments do not appear to be far-reaching or controversial. Therefore, staff's opinion is that a special evening meeting of the Board is not essential, although the Board has the option to schedule a special evening meeting after 5:00 pm if it so desires. One set of hearing dates, which would comply with state hearing and advertising requirements if approved by 4 or 5 votes of the Board, is as follows: Hearin>7 Date Time Meeting#1 Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:05 a.m. Meeting#2 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 5, 2013 9:05 a.m. Staff has confirmed that the chambers are available at 5:00 pm on either of the proposed dates. The Board may establish any other dates that meet state requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board concur with the proposed hearing dates or set other hearing dates to consider the proposed LDR amendments. ATTACHMENTS: None Indian River Co, Approved Date APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Admin. FOR: Legal BY: Budget /Z /-Z— Dept. Risk Mgr. FACommunity Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2012 BCC\LDR hearing dates Outdoor.doc 2 78 DEPARTMENTAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM Q J- TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director oro., AND Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engine r FROM: Michael D. Nixon, P.E., Roadway Production Manager SUBJECT: Resolutions for Paving(Millings) Improvements and to set a Public Hearing for 7th Place Petition Millings Project from 63`d Avenue to 60th Avenue in the Pine Tree Park Subdivision — IRC Project No. 1212 DATE: December 21, 2012 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Representatives in Pine Tree Park Subdivision presented County staff with a petition to install asphalt millings on 7th Place between 63`d Avenue and 60th Avenue.The project consists of 52 parcels,with 33 in favor of the project. The parcels vary in size. Based on square footage, 75.6% were in favor of the project. The minimum per the IRC code is 66.7%. Therefore this project meets the requirements for petition paving(millings). The proposed improvements to 7th Place will consist of the installation of 8-inch thick compacted asphalt millings over 9-inches of stabilized sub-grade. The roadway limits will be one block west of 63`d Avenue to 60th Avenue. The adjoining side streets mid-block north and south of 7th Place will be included in the roadway improvements. Two public Informational meetings were held by County staff with the petitioners to discuss the project scope and assessment process. The meetings were held on October 24, 2012 and December 5, 2012. In an effort to reduce costs as much as possible, it was decided that the Indian River County Road and Bridge Division would perform the construction. At the resident's request,the millings will be placed in the same area as the existing dirt roadway and no roadway widening,shoulder work or drainage will be included as part of the project. At the second meeting, the property owners consented to moving the project forward. A providing resolution is presented for adoption by the Board. The petition was valid based on receiving signatures of property owners owning 429,937.00 square feet of the 568,894.00 square feet in the proposed benefited area. This represents 75.6%of the property owners in the proposed benefited area in favor of having this road paved. A separate resolution is presented for adoption to hold a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability, project cost, and amount of the assessment for each property owner in the benefited area.This Public Hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, February 12, 2013 at 9:05 A.M. in the Indian River County Commission Chambers. An assessment roll and assessment plat has been prepared and will befiled with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. FAPublic Works•.F_NGINF.ERING DIVISION PROJECTS\]212-7th Place-60th Ave to 63rd Ave-Petition Paving`Admimlagenda items\]212-7th Place-Pet.Paving RES.1&2.1-5- 79 1"i—i— Page 2 7th Place Petition Millings Project (63rd Avenue to 60th Avenue) —Pine Tree Park Subdivision For January 8, 2013 BCC Meeting FUNDING The total estimated project cost= $90,398.93 75%to be paid by property owners = $67,799:20 2% Collection fee (75%figure $1,355.98 Total assessment= $69,155.18 25% to be paid by the County = $22,599.73 to be allocated from the Road and Bridge Petition Paving Account No. 11121441-035510-13010 7 thPlace/Pine Tree Park(60th Avenue-63rd Avenue) RECOMMENDATION 1) Adopt the resolution providing for the millings installation for 7th Place Petition Milling Project between 63rd Avenue and 601h Avenue in the Pine Tree Park Subdivision subject to the terms outlined in the resolution. The Board of County Commissioners shall establish the applicable interest rate at the time the final assessment roll is approved. 2) Allocate$22,599.73 from the Road and Bridge Petition Paving Account No. 11121441-035510- 130107 th Place/Pine Tree Park(60th Avenue-63rd Avenue) 3) Adopt a resolution setting the time and place of the Public Hearing.—February 12,2013,at 9:05 am. ATTACHMENTS 1. Providing Resolution 2. Setting Resolution for Public Hearing 3. Cost Estimate 4. Assessment Roll and Assessment Plat DISTRIBUTION 1. Terry Cook, Road& Bridge Superintendent 2. Vincent M. Burke, P.E., Director of Utilities Services APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR January 8. 2013 Indian River County Approved Date By Administration Budget Z (3 Legal Utilities Public Works (/inn.. 12 26 Engineering q / F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING^DIVISION PROJECTS\1212-7th Place-60th Ave to 63rd Ave-Petition Paving\Admim\agenda items\1212-7th 80 Providing (First Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN ASPHALT MILLING IMPROVEMENTS TO 7TH PLACE WEST OF 63RD AVENUE TO 60TH AVENUE, IN PINE TREE PARK SUBDIVISION, PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL, INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED. WHEREAS, the County Public Works Department has been petitioned for Road Asphalt Milling Improvements for 7d'Place west of 63rd Avenue to 60th Avenue"the Project"in Pine Tree Park Subdivision. WHEREAS,the construction of milling improvements by special assessment funding is authorized by Chapter 206, Section 206.01 through 206.09, Indian River County Code; and cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls have been completed by the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, two public meetings were held by County staff with the landowners and more than �..,. 75%of the property owners affected by the Project are in favor of having their property specially assessed in order to provide an improvement to their neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the County Road and Bridge Division will construct the Project in order to keep the cost of construction to a minimum; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in their entirety. 2. A project providing for milling improvements to 7d'Place west of 63rd Avenue to 60th Avenue in Pine Tree Park Subdivision; heretofore designated as Public Works Project No. 1212 is hereby approved subject to the terms outlined above and all applicable requirements of Chapter 206, et seq. Indian River County Code. 3. This Resolution shall be published by the Public Works Department one time in the Vero Beach 81 Resolution No. 2013- Press Journal newspaper. 4. The total estimated cost of the proposed paving and drainage improvements is NINETY THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED NINETY EIGHT DOLLARS and NINETY THREE cents($90,398.93) 5. The special assessment provided hereunder shall, for any given record owner of property within the area specially benefited, be in an amount equal to that proportion of seventy-five percent(75%) of the total cost of the project plus 2%collection fee($1,355.98)which the number of acreage owned by the given owner bears to the total number of acreage within the areas specially benefited 6. Twenty-five percent(25%)of the total cost of the project($22,599.73)will be paid by the County and shall come from the Petition Paving Account. 7. Assessments are to be levied against all lots and lands adjoining and contiguous or bounding and abutting upon the improvements or specially benefited thereby and fiu-ther designated by the assessment plat with respect to the special assessments. `�- 8. After examination of the nature and anticipated usage of the proposed improvements,the Board of County Commissioners has determined that the following described properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these improvement, to wit: Lots 11 through 20,Block A;Lots 11 through 20,Block B;Lots 1 through 10,Block D;and Lots 1 through 10, Block C; Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1 Subdivision, Plat Book 3, Page 38 and Lots 13 through 24,Block A;Lots 12 through 22,Block B;Lots 1 through 12,Block D; and Lots 1 through 11, Block C: Pine Tree Park Unit No. 4 Subdivision, Plat Book 4,Page 57. 9. Any special assessment not paid within said ninety(90)day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable in two (2)equal installments,the first to be made twelve(12)months from the due date and subsequent payment to be due by the next year. 10. The special assessment shall become due and payable at the office of the Department of Utility Services of Indian River County ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special assessment _2_ V2 Resolution No. 2013- pursuant to Section 206.08, Indian River County Code. 11. A plat showing the area to be assessed is on file with the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, 1801 27"' Street, Building A, Room A2-801, Vero Beach, Florida, and is open for inspection from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice-Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this day of 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney r 3 83 Time and Place (Second Reso.) RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON 7 T PLACE WEST OF 63RD AVENUE TO 60TH AVENUE, IN THE PINE TREE PARK SUBDIVISION, COUNTY PROJECT No.1212 AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING ASPHALT MILLING IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PROPERTY AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIFICALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITTED THEREBY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has, by Resolution No. 2013- , determined that it is necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the County, and particularly as to those living, working, and owning property within the area described herein, that asphalt milling improvements be made to said property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of making asphalt milling improvements to said property, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefore, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each property benefited thereby. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Board of County Commissioners shall meet at the County Commission Chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour of 9:05 A.M. on Tuesday, February 12 2013 at which time the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested persons may appear before said Board and be heard in regard to said property. The area to be improved and the properties to be 84 Time and Place (Second Reso.) specifically benefited are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special assessment. 2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and the special assessments against the properties to be specifically benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of the Clerk to the Board any week day from 8:30 A.M. until 5:00 P.M. 3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given by the Department of Public Works by two publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a week apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of Public Works shall give the owner of each property to be specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such property owners at his last known address. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote,the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice-Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari -2- 85 Time and Place (Second Reso.) `Am- The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passes and adopted this day of , 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller ti... Approved as to form and leel sufficiency: William K. Debraal;+Deputy County Attorney Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL COST ESTIMATE FOR: 7th Place From West of 63rd Avenue to 60th Avenue 12-21-12 ASPHALT MILLINGS ONLY Project #1212 TOTAL S.F. 568,894.00 1. CONSTRUCTION $80,539.00 2. ENGINEERING (5% of construction cost) $4,026.95 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING $84,565.95 3. PERMIT FEES $200.00 4. TESTING $2,000.00 5. RECORDING FEE $1,000.00 SUB-TOTAL $87,765.95 6. 3.00% ADMIN. FEE $2,632.98 TOTAL COST OF PROJECT $90,398.93 75%TO BE PAID BY PROPERTY OWNERS $67,799.20 2% COLLECTIONS FEE (75% FIGURE) $1,355.98 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $69,155.18 25%TO BE PAID BY COUNTY $22,599.73 COST PER SQ.FT. 1 $0.121560748 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1212-7th Place-60th Ave to 63rd Ave-Petition Paving\Admim\Assessment\Assessment.ASPHALT MILLING ONLY 12-21-12xls.x1s 87 Dec.21,2012 PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE PROJECT NAME: 7th PLACE PETITION MILLINGS (63rd AVE. TO 60th AVE). IRC Project No.1212 (MILLINGS ONLY-NO DRAINAGE OR DRIVEWAY WORK) 101-1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 500.00 500.00 102-1 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 110-7 MAILBOX RELOCATION LS 1 500.00 500.00 120-1 GRADING EXCAVATION EMBANKMENT AND FINAL DRESSING LS 1 20 000.00 20 000.00 160-4 TYPE B STABILIZATION-9" SY 7,384 2.00 14 768.00 M-1 MILLINGS 8"thick-two lifts ASSUMED 18'WIDTH AVG. SY 6,734 6.50 43 771.00 TOTAL $ 80,539.00 LS=Lump Sum SY=Square Yard 00310-3 (� F:\PublicWorks\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1212-7th Place-60th Ave to 63rd Ave-Petition PavinglAdmim\Assessment\1212 7th Place Petition Millings 8 VX ASPHALT MILLING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR: Cost Per Square Foot = 0.121560748 7th Place-West of 63rd Avenue to 60th Avenue - p 91, r ,. Pine Tree Park Unit No.1 Bik A Lot 11 & i 33391700002000100011.0 1Flsh Theodore Kenneth Jr. 16396 7th PI., Vero Beach, FL 32968 W 1/2 of Lot 12 PBI 3-38 10,454 $1,270.791 _... _....... ...._.....__.._ ..._ __-___ ___.._.__._ Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, PBI 3-38 E 1/2 € Borchardt, Wayne W. & I lof Lot 12&all Lot 13 Blk A, Less add R/W1 33391700002000100012 1 !Rebecca M. 16376 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 for 7th PI. as in OR BK 867 PG 891 _ 10,454 1 $1,270.791 __.. 'Pine Tree Park Unit No 1 Blk A Lots 14 L333,91 7.010..O,,0.20,,O.,O..l..O,.O,O,.l.,.4..0 :Schuessler Glenn& Linda ;6356 7th PI., Vero Beach, FL 32968 15&W 1/2 of Lot 16 PBI 3-38 17,860 $2,171.061 . Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, PBI 3-38 Blk-A,' _,. .___.._. ..__._.___...._.._ I IE 1/2 of Lot 16 and all of Lots 17 thru 20 33391700002000100018.0 ;Hall, Robert D. &Elinor B. 1765 1 Ave.,Vero Beach, FL32968 inc 36,155 1 $4,395.021 iSabonjohn, Peter(TR)& Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk D Lot 10, 33391700002000400010 0 ;Cannon, Susan (TR........ _._......_.._I_.._..._.____._...___-_.__._________..-__....____ ___..___._�__.. . I Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk D Lots i 33391700002000400006 0 Alkayaly,Ahmad&Sally 6375 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 6,7,8&9, PBI 3-38 28,750 $3,494.871 Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk D Lot 5, - � 33391700002000400005.0 Green Edward&Theresa 16345 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 1PBI 3-38 1 7,405 $9 00.16 _. �.. _ _ E Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, BlD Bilk Lot 4, 33391700002000400004 0 Smith Michelle E. 16335 7th Pl., Vero Beach, FL 32968 IPBI 3-38 7,405 $900.16( 1 1 Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk D Lot `33391700002000400003.0 'Soumar, Joel C. 16325 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 'PBI 3-38 7,405 1 _.... ......... ......._....... _._....__.._._.____......._______._..._ _._.__..____.__._.._ .__.__..._..__. ._...._ ___-._._..._..___._._._..._..__.........__,_.._.___.. ___.... 16; 900. Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk D Lots 1 & 33391700002000400001.0 Housel, Kevin L. &Edie R. 16315 7th PI., Vero Beach, FL 32968 i2, PBI 3-38 18,295 $2,223.95' .... . . . .. .. . Hankinson Norman J. &Sandra Pine Tree ark Unit No. 1, Blk B Lots 19 ! M391700002000200019.0 i J .6286 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 1&20, PBI 3-38 1 17,424 $2,118.071 I Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk B Lots 17 391700002000200017.0 'Russ,Wayne H. &Shirley A. 16276 7th Pl., Vero Beach, FL 32968 l& 18, PBI 3-38 1 14,810 I $1,800.31 j .......... _. _..._............._-__..__..-1.-..........................._ _ ... _ ..__._.................. . ,Trodglen Paul M & Elizabeth Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk B Lots 15 1 1 33391700002000200015.0 IM 16236 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 & 16, PBI 3-38 I 14,810 $1,800.311 Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk B Lots 13 33391700002000200013.0 !Holman, Steven R. (TR) (TOK) 6226 7th Pl.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 1& 14, PBI 3-38 14,810 l $1,800.311 Alcaraz-Lopez Enrique&Zaida l 1 Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk B Lots 11 _�� � ;33391700002000200011. 'l. 6206 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 1& 12, PBI 3-3814,810 1 $1,800.31 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1212-7th Place-60th Ave to 63rd Ave-Petition Paving\Admim\Assessment\Assessment.ASPHALT MILLING ONLY 12-21-12xls.xls 0 1 to 1 ASPHALT MILLING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR: Cost Per Square Foot = 0.121560748 7th Place-West of 63rd Avenue to 60th Avenue Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk C Lots 1 33391700002000300001.0 ;Burke,Thomas J. &Kathleen A. 6285 7th PL,Vero Beach, FL 32968 12, PBI 3-38 ! 17,424 _.___._.___......__$2,1,18.071 i Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk C N 100 ft . 33391700002000300003 1 Lopez Deanna (6275 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 of Lot 3&all Lot 4, PBI 3-38 _ 13,504 ? $1,641.56( IPine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk C Lots 5 33391700002000300005 0 !Culp, John& Linn, Carol J. 16245 7th PI., Vero Beach, FL 32968 'thru 7 inc&Lot 16, PBI 3-38 29,185 $3,547.75. l fPine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk C Lots 8& 33391700002000300008.0 Novak,William J. 16225 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 !9, PBI 3-38 ! 14,810 $1,80_0__._31 I l I Pine Tree Park Unit No. 1, Blk C Lot 10, 33391700002000300010.0 (Meeks, Ronald E. 6205 7th Pl.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 PBI 3-38 ( 7,405 ( $900.16 Ooley, Danny&Vaughn, I Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk A Lots 23 33391700005000100023 0 Heather Lynne (Onley) 16196 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 &24, PBI 4-57 ! 11,761 $1,429.681 Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk A Lot 22, I '33391700005000100022.0 Diaz Concepcion&Nieto, Jorge 6186 7th Pl.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 PBI 4-57 _ 5,�663 1 $688.40 ..... .... .__ _. _....._ ..._ ........... € �� -Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk A Lot 21, i �- 33391700005000100021.0 ;Arnold,Jeffrey P.&Tina M. 16176 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 PBI 4-57 5,663 $688.401 .........._...._........._......_..........................._..._.........._....._............__......_._..____.._....__.___.._........_._..._.._________.__......_......_.._.___.._ _._._...,_.__.___..__.w....._._............._.._____._......_......____...._____....__._ _............................. .................._.. Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk A Lot 20, i ; :33391700005000100020.0 !Barlow, Myong yw w�16166 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 !PBI 4-57 I 5,663 I $688.40 I Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk A Lot 19, i -33391700005000100019.0 tCambron, Dean D:_.._ ,.,._ W 6156 7th Pl.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 IPBI 4-57 5,663. 1 $688.401 _ ..._..., Pine Park Unit No. 4, Blk A Lot 18, 33391700005000100018.0 =NIC Management LLC (TRS) 16146 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 PBI 4-57 5,663 $688.40, Gelfo, Maureen J. &Gelfo, 1765 61 st Ave.,Vero Beach, FL Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, BRA Lots 13 ! i 33391700005000100013.0 !Regina 132968 ;thru 17 inc, PBI 4-57 28,750 i $3,494.87 .__._... .._.__. ...__....... ._ .........._. ....._ ._._..a_......._........___............__.._...._.__.__.. ___...._._.,,.._._...._.,..._.__.._.,....._...._._.__ .____....e......_.__.._...._......____.__,.._._._..... ..a..,_..__........_____.________._._.__..___._.._._....__........__...._ I Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D Lots 1 & I i33391700005000400001.0 Scharr John C. & Marsha £6195 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 2 PBI 4-57 9,583 $1,164.92 i [Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D Lot 3& •,.____.._.._._I 33391700005000400003.0 !Morris, James Edward 16185 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 iW 1/2 of Lot 4, PBI 4-57 1 8,276 $1,006.04 ILachance, Matthew Roland& Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D E 1/2 Lot 33391700005000400004.0 i Rebecca Lee 6175 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 ;4&all Lot 5, PBI 4-57� _ l 8,276 $1,006.04' I Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D Lot 6, l ?33391700005000400006.0 ;Gardner, Homer R. . _..._ i.._._.. _..___.__._. ..........__._ i Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D Lot 7, 1 33391700005000400007.0 'Renz, Carl W. & Mary Ann 7th Pl., Vero Beach, FL 32968 !PBI 4-57 5,663 # $688.40 .......... _ __._ ....._ _ _ _ �.. i I Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D Lots 8& I 33391700005000400008.0 i Rotondo, Louis _ 16135 7th PI , Vero Beach, FL 32968 =19,PBI 4-57 X11,326 -1,376-811)11 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1212-7th Place-60th Ave to 63rd Ave-Petition Paving\Admim\Assessment\Assessment.ASPHALT MILLING ONLY 12-21-12xls.xis 2 ASPHALT MILLING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR: Cost Per Square Foot = 0.121560748 7th Place-West of 63rd Avenue to 60th Avenue Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D Lot 10, 33391700005000400010.0 '.Pierce, Margaret A. (LE) '6115 7th PL,Vero Beach, FL 32968 PBI 4-57 � 5,663 $688.401 . _ ..._. _..._ _ ....._ IPine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D Lot 11, 33391700005000400011.0 Cox, Bret .... _ ..� _ 6,098 �1 $741.281 _ � __ ,Shambora, Robert Douglas& 735 61st Ave.,Vero Beach, FL Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk D Lot 12, 33391700005000400012.0 Diana T. 32968 J PBI 4-57 4,792 1 $582.52 I Pine Tree bark Unit No.4, PBI 4-57 Blk B lthe W 16 ft of Lot 19&all of Lots 20,21 &1 .33391700005000200019.0 Fitzgerald,1122 Jeri L. (Johnston) ;6086 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 _ 18,731 1 $2,276.951 Pine Tree(Park Unit No.4, Blk B W 34ft" µry 33391700005000200018.0_ Morgan Gary L Jr & Robin M. =6076 7th PI., Vero Beach, FL 32968 jLot 18& 19 Less W16ft, PBI 4-57 7,841 $953.166 I Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk B Lots 17 1 W 34ft, PBI 4-57 I 33391700005000200017.0 Morgan Gary L Jr &Robin M 16046 7th PL7,405 $900.161, Vero Beach, FL 32968 1& 18 Less _ ;Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk B Lot 16, 33391700005000200016.0 ;Donovan Raymond 16036 7th Pl.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 1PB14-57 _ _ A 5,663 _ $688.40 Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk B Lots 14 1 33391700005000200014 0 Hiers Properties LLC 16016 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 '& 15, PB[4-57 11,326 $1,376.801 IWoodyear, Barney R. &Brock, ?765 60th Ave.,Vero Beach, FL Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk B Lot 12, '33391700005000200012.0 ;Judith L. 132968 1PB1 4-57 5,663 i $688.401 Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk B Lot 13, ;33391700005000200013.0 Hiers Properties LLC 6006 7th PI., Vero Beach, FL 32968 IPBI 4-57 ; 6,098 $741.281 1736 61 st Ave.,Vero Beach, FL IPine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk C Lots 1 & 1 33391700005000300001.0 Korsman,Al- ..._....... I IPine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk C Lots 3& 33391700005000300003 0 Fulton Mindy Sue" _ 16065 7th PI., Vero Beach, FL 32968 14, PBI 4-57 i 11,326 1 $1,376.801 . . p. _.___..._.._ Pine Tree Park Unit No 4 Blk C Lot 5, _ .i 33391700005000300005 0 Llnzer, Ronald G &Michele A. 16055 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 IPBI 4-57 5,663 $688:40 I IPine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk C Lot 6, 1 33391700005000300006 !Coo Joyce&Street, Vero , _Kim C. 16045 7th PI., VBeach, FL 32968 ?PBI 4-57 I 5663 � $ 0 !Costello, 688.40' .. _.._... _. _ l 1 Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk C Lot 7, .33391700005000300007.0 !Nelson, Brian C. &Judy 1. §6035 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 IPBI 4-57 _ 5,663 $688.40 ...._........______.__.__._.._._.____.-.__._.____._...____._ _ ..___..__._.____._.__._._.._._._.._...._._._.._._._._..__....____.._...._._____.. __...._.._.._...._.__._..___.. i Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk C Lot 8, 33391700005000300008 0 Introcaso,Alex !6025 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 PBI 4-57 ! 5,663 $688.40# _._._.....-_-.............. __...._.._.__.___..... _ 1Nne Tree Park U�nif No. 4, Blk C Lot 9, I = 33391700005000300009.0 Roberts, Kathy&„Derek -;6015 7th PL,Vero Beach, FL 32968 PBI 457 5,663 _ $688.40 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1212-7th Place-60th Ave to 63rd Ave-Petition Paving\AdmimWssessment\Assessment.ASPHALT MILLING ONLY 12-21-12x1s.x1s 3 ASPHALT MILLING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR: Cost Per Square Foot = 0.121560748 7th Place-West of 63rd Avenue to 60th Avenue WIN ;; i 1 Pine Tree Park Unit No 4 Blk C Lot 10, � � 33391700005000300010.0 Iosada, Marta Maria J6005 7th PI.,Vero Beach, FL 32968 PBI 4-57 _... __-._. - 6,098 $741.28; .. ... 735 60th Ave.,Vero Beach, FL Pine Tree Park Unit No.4, Blk C Lot 11, E.._...... .___-._ I 33391700005000300011.0 :Silvestri, Gabriella 132968 PBI 4-57 5,227 I $635.401 Total= 568,894 $69,155.18 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1212-7th Place-60th Ave to 63rd Ave-Petition Paving\Admim\Assessment\Assessment.ASPHALT MILLING ONLY 12-21-12x1s.x1s 4 N Q lBB IBO ABB C.PAPH/C SCA[E P/K 1Wf ARK U W.f 1 - f f P aw . ! Z MY K h9 1 h PbV TREE K 5W i B UCK A ...I_ O O BLOC Bm 10 O B O f S © O P.B.O: 57 1 1 to o G.B. PG �Q N $ ) A S .G 1,8 .G J o G U I I S 5 0 F \ 0 I ft I O CI t \ 3 `,/7/ 1 RMIT 1 1 Z , AI E � [ 6 0 0 G ) ) ] 5 RN WE An.f C 7pal l P C M]I P/ 1W AR .I 1 I % P.B. ,G. )g O JB ® B t.PC.5 © ® P.B.4. - C 5 04 LEGEND PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED ASSESSMENT MAP 7TH PL. FROM WEST OF 63RD A VE. TO 60TH A VE. 0 a 0 S NOTE.' S.F. AREAS ARE PER THE 11MAN RIVER COUNTY z PROPERTY APPRAISE,? z U No. Revision Dole B INDIAN RIVER cOUNN ' ' "' 7TH PL. PETITION ASPHALT MILLINGS SHEET ® Depor/msn/ of Pub/fc Works ,,�R „ 1 1001 271h STREET Englneering Dlvfslon f2f2 ASSESSMENT MAP VERO BEACH FL 32960 OF 772 567-8000 - - to W v cow (04 3 3- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA m * BOARD MEMORANDUM ��RZOA Date: December 11,2012 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke,Director of Utility Services dv Prepared By: Michael C.Hotchkiss,P.E., Capital Projects Manager ///9 Subject: Approval of Amendment 1 to Work Order No.3 with Kimley-Horn and Associates,Inc. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: On July 17, 2012 the Board of County Commission approved Work Order No. 3 with Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. (KHA) for design and implementation of a lime softening with carbon dioxide injection at the two County regional water treatment facilities. The original scope of services did not include design of the finished water stabilization system to facilitate automation of the permeate degasifier valves and dampers at the North County RO Facility. Automation of the valves and dampers will allow equipment to be shut down when not needed, resulting in more efficient and less expensive operation of the water treatment facility. Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 3 provides additional scope of services for design and implementation of the valve and damper automation at the North County RO Facility. Work Order No. 3 was approved for consulting fees not to exceed $193,600.00. Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 3 provides the consultant with an additional $17,700.00 for design and construction phase services to administer the changes. This will result in an approved contract amount for Work Order No. 3 in the amount of$211,300.00. FUNDING: Funding for the Water Treatment Facility Water Stabilization Project Account is available in the Utilities operating fund. The operating fund budget is derived from water and sewer revenues. ACCOUNT NO.: Description Account Number Amount Lime Slurry Injection RO Plants 471-169000-12515 $17,700.00 94 Page-2- REGULAR AGENDA ITEM RECOMMENDATION: It is Staff's recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 3 with KHA in the amount of$17,700.00, and authorize the Chairman to execute same,as presented. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 3 and supporting documents (4 Pages) APPROVED FOR AGENDA: Indian River Co. Approved Date a By: Administration 3 Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Utilities � �Z For. A/ Utilities �Z_ Do Budget Z r.n. Legal Z 7,0'1 f:\utilities\utility - engineering\projects - utility construction permits\irc - water stabilization\agenda - approval of amendment 1 to work order no. 3 with kha-rl.docUtility /1 5r Construction Permits\IRC - Water Stabilization ��•/ AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 WORK ORDER NUMBER 3 This Amendment _1_ to Work Order Number _3_ is entered into as of this day of ' 20_12_ pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15, 2011 (the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., ("Consultant"). 1. The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth in existing Work Order Number_3_, Effective Date_July 17, 2012 2. The COUNTY and the Consultant desire to amend this Work Order as set forth on Exhibit 1 (Scope of Work) attached to this Amendment and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 1 (Fee Schedule), and within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 1 (Time Schedule), all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. 3. From and after the Effective Date of this Amendment, the above-referenced Work Order is amended as set forth in this Amendment. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS KIMLEY-HORN and OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ASSOCIATES, INC. -17 By: By: Kevin Schanen, P.E. Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Title: Vice President BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffry R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk 6 Approved: im A -&, seph A. Baird, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Alan S olackwic , Sr., County Attorney 96 Exhibit#1 Amendment 1 to Work Order Number 3 Valve Actuator Additions to North RO Water Plant PROJECT DESCRIPTION This amendment#1 modifies Work Order#3 to include modifications to the North RO water plant permeate degasifier valves and dampers to allow automation of each. Automation will allow equipment to be taken off-line when not needed for treatment capacity and will reduce operating costs of the facility. The scope of work consists of design, modifications to the finish water stabilization (FWS) drawings to include these design changes,preparation of specifications, and bidding support needed to implement automation of the post-treatment system at the North RO water treatment plant. In summary,the additional scope of work in general, consists of. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Consultant will review existing process equipment at the North plant and evaluate options for implementing valve actuators on the permeate piping to each degasifier and air header dampers from each degasifier. The attached exhibit illustrates the locations where actuators are required. 2. Consultant will design improvements to the penneate degasifier inlet valve to include new valves and actuators in the degasifier inlets, and actuators and dampers on the air header system to allow isolation of individual degasifiers. Consultant will design a pressure relief system to prevent over-pressurizing of the permeate piping in case of valve failure. Consultant will design I&C improvements needed for each actuator, including power and instrumentation. Consultant will prepare revised drawings that illustrate the valve actuator improvements and include these drawings as an addendum to the finish water stabilization project currently being prepared for advertisement. Mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation drawings will be modified to include these changes. The drawings will be included as an addendum to the FWS project documents. 3. Consultant will prepare an operating logic and description for the sequencing of each of the valve and damper actuators. This description will need to be integrated within the existing plant operating logic and will be used by the contractors I&C integrator. 4. Consultant will provide construction phase and operation startup services of this element which will consist of review of submittals, coordination and oversight of implementation of the operational sequencing and integration of the existing PLC and HMI system, and observation of the operating sequence. K:\WPB_Civil\044572022-IRCU Stabilization\Scope\FW Stabilization North RO Plant Actuator Addition-Amd.#1 to WO 3.doc Page ] of 2 97 ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following services are not included in the Scope of Services for this project, but may be required depending on circumstances that may arise during the execution of this project. Other items that may be considered additional services are mentioned herein. Additional services include, but may not be limited to the following: • SCADA programming INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OWNER The Owner shall provide the follow information related to the design of this project: • Electric Actuator vendors ATTACHMENT 1 - SCHEDULE Services for Task 1 through 3 are anticipated to be completed within 2 weeks of the notice to proceed. Task 4 will be concurrent with construction phase services and are anticipated to be completed within seven to eight months, depending on the contractors schedule. ATTACHMENT 2 - FEES We will provide these services in accordance with our Continuing Services Contract Agreement for Professional Services dated November 15, 2011, with Indian River County. The Consultant will provide these additional services for a lump sum fee as follows: Task No. Task Task Fee 1 Review Existing System $2,700 2 Design & Prepare drawings/specifications $85500 3 Prepare Operating Logic $3,500 4 Coordination and Implementation phase $35000 Total Lump Sum Fee—= $17,700 K:\WPB_Civil\044572022-1RCU Stabilization\Scope\FW Stabilization North RO Plant Actuator Addition-Amd.#I to WO 3.doc Page 2 of 2 98 xn 141m1TY AtuLTYSL TM M EMa40 M9FD W1f11 MIX . i t3N 1>Jo SSO WTD ENSnxO SA54RL ux[ HA9 6EDSIIEND INDICAlQfS fTEI W"'UE7�IWt Aro MEa Co-6r�IOTAI iW'E mtauclm�nms u BLEND (PONFFINISHED WATER CLEARWELL) ta RACK WATER iC PEAYEAIE T xowO] AR i IYY Ptvsn.LW-72 I N1POOnDpfE I »- 7— IS ) x i 90°1eimE sooRY ITIe1t0>LE i u ss i i 9o4LAx I NWxNJAunIL ):zo-xA wm50°`r'oowert nto-t' / Lw )xxo-u rs I Is C °°YP ESH C I10i-r srAP1't"'ilw tv xa T rDeEa Na x anw4psAMs P9I Pew Avl a KH Pst Is lYYem�nwn s¢Note t i ps niwl'�se xm )no-xe .� N0' �D. xno ( Y Irox^ Ya°A""wT vT nEo-te 1 \ Doeo_ \ Y MYe"""oE xooD-e xaoo-t a000-x xooD-J ur aAna M4lV[Plv Y N Y N Y N .a. L91N IE i M xB RE41GE 1Wx ��� 8 DOOR CONTR01 SYSTEM NO 1 ��Nat etn.EA N6 R M0.S xa t xD.x N0.J x10.4 c � PERMEATE (gj 5i4IT F)) (yg F)) WATER MIE LIME etEHD Isc sw¢r tee) (s¢saxT IJf �e WATER D 1RAMSip1 WIYK YTRANSFER PUMP STATION rv1 / / 2 , e i u J10-t )J4�1 ) x 7-1 L[ oe OeP _ ff 5v i;w / w NmemveL NaE ^ 4 Jlo- 7310-2 1P0 v Na♦ )DieA�Na J R L91 o-}A talurz IA d xoePx kr o-JPtA. LSl Y uNM N K aur t VAX x WUBeER eoaeein )Jxo-xe .� 's i `(o4NN u YoeNx TD g mrd�4 D�.vla WANT LIn i E e�tu xa a nw aAmv� G' (SEL alm I->) WE ODOR CONTROL Sy$IFIa N0,2 SLE SN3f 1-e) i DECASIFlERS "o U C AS NOTEDDALE xsu Sxpx[De SHEET NUMBER xx x.°T NOM '[. andA?LSsadiete4,IIRC. AUG.2012 INDIAN IRIWE1R CCUNW LMIUMEES rtuoMMARK 0.LkLExuSem. INORTH IRLMlf PR_T ND. FINISH1t6Y1/AlfM S1L�I�19U(ZA711:01N .s320 NSDNeRT NOM 4PIsewl�� 046`'4AEG(Mtj `461N1)s"' 044572022 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IBRD ��-� FLORIDA DATE cm C.0 13 Attorney's Matters-B.CC 1.8.13 Of ce of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attornd DATE: December 31, 2012 SUBJECT: Possible New Incentives in the Enterprise Zone BACKGROUND. In 1982, the Florida Legislature enacted the Florida Enterprise Zone Act ("Act"). The purpose of the Act was to create incentives at the state level, and to encourage local governments to create incentives at the local level, for the purpose of inducing private investment in productive business enterprises located in severely distressed areas. In 2005, the County and the City of Vero Beach jointly established an Enterprise Zone consisting of the Vero Beach Airport, areas surrounding the airport, and areas of Gifford located to the north of the air- port. Part of the Enterprise Zone is located within the unincorporated area of the County, and part is lo- cated within the municipal boundaries of the City. A diagram of the Enterprise Zone area is attached as Exhibit A. On September 4, 2012, the City of Vero Beach adopted Ordinance 2012-16 which created a 50% ex- emption from the 10% utility tax levied by the city on electricity charges, for a"qualifying business" lo- cated in the Enterprise Zone. A "qualifying business" was generally defined as one which first occupies a new facility to which electrical service had not previously been provided, or first occupies a renovated or rehabilitated facility to which electrical service had not been provided during the prior three billing cycles. The exemption applies only within the portion of the Enterprise Zone located with the City of Vero Beach. Indian River Co. Approved Date APPROVED FOR JANUARY 8, 2013 Admin B.C.C. MEETING—ATTORNEY'S MATTERS Co.Att . f 1 Budget '?j Dept. COUNTYATT Risk M-- Z.-1—fir-ado, grZ.-1—fir-Zdo, 100 Board of County Commissioners December 31, 2012 `�— Page Two Prior to final adoption of Ordinance 2012-16 by the City Council, the Board of County Commissioners discussed possible new incentives which the County could adopt in the Enterprise Zone. One possible incentive mentioned was a waiver of some or all franchise fees charged by the County on utility services to businesses locating or expanding in the zone. At the conclusion of the discussion, the County Attor- ney was tasked with exploring all possible incentives, and bringing a "menu" of possible incentives to the Board for initial consideration—which is the purpose of this agenda item. The County Attorney's expectation is that the Board will consider the possible incentives discussed in this memo, and will identify those which the Board is willing to consider for adoption. At that point, County staff will fully analyze the identified incentives and, unless problems are discovered, will move forward with the final consideration and adoption process. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS. The process of identifying possible new incentives for the Enterprise Zone begins with an understanding of the incentives which already exist. Existing incentives fall into several categories: (1) County creat- ed economic development incentives which generally apply throughout the entire unincorporated Coun- ty, including the Enterprise Zone, (2) State of Florida created incentives which are specific to Enterprise Zones, and (3) County created incentives which are specific to the Enterprise Zone. County created incentives which apply throughout the entire unincorporated County, including the En- terprise Zone, are summarized in the Economic Development Initiatives section and Policy 2.2 of the Economic Development Element of the County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan (collectively attached as Exhibit B), and include: • Qualified target industry tax refund program • Local jobs grant program • Impact fee financing program • Waiver of County utility deposits • Expedited permitting • Industrial revenue bonds • Ad valorem tax exemption approved by referendum in November 2010 • Assistance with federal or state grant applications • Special incentives granted by the BCC on a case by case basis (e.g., infrastructure im- provements, etc) • Training/Recruitment programs offered by Workforce Solutions R l4nonevlLindnIGEAFR-ILIBCCl9gendn AlemoslEnterpnse Zone Incentives Id- 101 Board of County Commissioners December 31, 2012 - Page Three State of Florida created incentives specific to Enterprise Zones are set forth in FS 290.007 (attached as Exhibit C), and include: • Jobs credit • Property tax credit • Community contribution tax credit • Sales tax exemption for building materials used in property rehabilitation projects • Sales tax exemption for business equipment • Sales tax exemption for electrical energy • Jobs credit against sales tax • Possible FSC -')0'7'0 discount on tariffed rates for public utilities and telecommunications services And, existing County created incentives specific to the Enterprise Zone include: • 10% "bonus" under local jobs grant program • Reduced qualification criteria for the ad valorem tax exemption approved by referendum in November 2010 r.. • Assistance with applications for state created incentives Against this background of existing incentives, the County Attorney researched Enterprise Zone incen- tives in other counties and municipalities, reviewed State of Florida reports summarizing local incentive activity throughout the state, and worked with the Planning Department and with Helene Caseltine of the Chamber of Commerce to develop a list of possible new County incentives for the Enterprise zone. The effort was influenced by the fact that Florida law grants broad authority to counties to create economic incentives generally (FS 125.045) and in Enterprise Zones (FS 290.0135) (copies of the statutes are at- tached as Exhibit D). Eight possible new incentives were identified, all of which would apply only to new or expanding businesses. On November 8, 2012, the eight incentives were presented to the IRC Enterprise Zone Development Agency ("Agency") for comment. A copy of the draft minutes of the Agency meeting, which reflect Agency member comments on each proposed incentive, are attached as Exhibit E. The eight possible new incentives are: 1. Subsidize (in whole or in part) County Impact Fees. Under the current IRC Code, any business building new facilities, and some businesses expanding existing facilities, in the Enterprise Zone would be required to pay impact fees (note that corrections, public buildings and solid waste impact fees have been suspended countywide until March 31, 2014). Because of the "proportionate share" nature of im- pact fees, these fees cannot simply be waived; rather, non-payment of the fees by the new or expanding FWtto qDU d.IGENER7LIB CCWge d.Afem E.I rpris,Zn 1—fi,e 2doc 102 Board of County Commissioners December 31, 2012 ~- Page Four business must be replaced with payment of the fees by the County from another source. The proposed new incentive would be for the County to pay some or all of the impact fees for new or expanding busi- nesses in the Enterprise Zone. Funding for this payment would likely come from general revenues, gas tax revenues (for transportation impact fees) or the one cent sales tax revenues. The consensus of the Agency was to not recommend approval of this proposed incentive. 2. Financing o, f Impact Fees on More Favorable Terms. As noted above, the County already has a financing program for impact fees. With respect to water/sewer impact fees, the term is generally five years, with a hardship exception to ten years, and the interest rate is 5.75%per annum. The County does not typically finance other types of impact fees, although this has been done on a case by case basis for certain large employers. The proposed new incentive would be to either increase the term or lower the interest rate, or both. The challenge would be to secure payment with a lien which would survive fore- closure of a pre-existing mortgage. The Agency did not appear to reach a consensus on a recommenda- tion for approval or non-approval of this proposed incentive. It should be noted that, unrelated to Coun- ty incentives, impact fees can typically be financed with the construction lender, as part of the overall construction cost of a project. 3. Waive or Subsidize (in whole or in part) Development Fees. Any business seeking to locate or �— expand in the Enterprise Zone will likely incur development fees (such as a site plan application fee which typically ranges from $1,000 to $1,400, and a concurrency application fee of$120) and a building permit fee ($4.15 per $1,000 of construction cost). The proposal is to waive development fees, which would not require payment from another source because the planning department is funded through gen- eral revenues; and to subsidize the building_permit fee, which would require payment by the County from another source because the building department is organized as an enterprise fund, funded through collected fees. The consensus of the Agency was to recommend approval of this proposed incentive. 4. Subsidize (in whole or in part) Water and Sewer Connection Charges. Typical water and sewer connection charges are currently $155 (meter install fee of$130 and service fee of$25). The proposed incentive is for the County to pay these charges on behalf of the new or expanding business in the En- terprise Zone. Because the Utilities Department is also organized as an enterprise fund, payment by the County from another source would be required. The consensus of the Agency was to recommend ap- proval of this proposed incentive. 5. Infrastructure Improvement Program. Infrastructure improvements (roads, turn lanes, utility lines, etc) may be required for a business to locate or expand in the Enterprise Zone. While the County already has general authority to provide such improvements to encourage economic development throughout the unincorporated County (as noted above), a specific program outlining the circumstances under which the County will consider providing such improvements in the Enterprise Zone does not cur- rently exist. The proposed incentive is to create a specific program for the Enterprise Zone. The program F:W11 rn,lLmd.�GE'NERALOCCWge dnA1en TE w pK,,Zw 1-6—2.d- 103 Board of County Commissioners December 31, 2012 Page Five would not mandate that the County provide such improvements, but would identify factors considered by the County to be important in making its decision— and generally would spotlight the County's spe- cial desire to facilitate development in the Enterprise Zone. The consensus of the Agency was to rec- ommend approval of this proposed incentive. 6. Modify the Jobs Grant Program to Increase the Bonus for Jobs Created in the Enterprise Zone. As noted above, the County already has a Jobs Grant Program, and already grants a 10% "bonus" for jobs created in the Enterprise Zone. The proposed incentive is to increase the bonus to a higher figure, something between 20% and 50%. The consensus of the Agency was to recommend approval of this proposed incentive. 7. Waive or Subsidize the Local Business Tax Receipt for a Limited Period of Time. All business- es pay a local business tax (formerly occupational license tax) in the amount of$40 per year. The pro- posed incentive is to waive or subsidize the local business tax for new businesses in the Enterprise Zone for a limited period of time —perhaps three to five years. The consensus of the Agency was to recom- mend approval of this proposed incentive. 8. Waive (in whole or in part) the Franchise Fee or Fee-in-Lieu-of-Franchise Fee for a Limited Pe- riod of Time. Whether utilities are provided in the unincorporated portion of the Enterprise Zone by the County, the City of Vero Beach or Florida Power& Light, the County collects either a franchise fee or a fee-in-lieu-of-franchise-fee of 6%. The proposed incentive is to waive this fee, in whole or in part, for a limited period of time — again, perhaps three to five years. Because these fees are deposited into the general fund, the County would not be required to pay the funds from another source. Also, because franchise fees are excluded from the definition of "Net Revenues" in the County's outstanding bond documents, a waiver of the fees would not violate bond covenants. Implementation of this incentive would probably require amendment of the franchise agreements with the City of Vero Beach and Florida Power& Light. The consensus of the Agency was to recommend approval of this proposed incentive. After speaking with County administrative staff, there ate some concerns about (1) the financial cost of some of these incentives, and (2) the administrative burden in implementing some of these incentives. These concerns have not been fully vetted to date, on the notion that staff did not want to spend signifi- cant time analyzing incentives which the Board had not yet reviewed on a preliminary basis. Thus, as stated above, once the Board indicates which incentives it would like to pursue, staff will complete the analysis effort. Finally, it is obvious that some of the incentives involve small sums of money and, in the final decision of a new or expanding business, will carry little weight. However, after discussing the matter with He- lene Caseltine and the Agency, it was felt that the addition of even "small" incentives may be useful in the effort to promote the Enterprise Zone and develop interest among business owners who might not otherwise be familiar with the overall benefits available in these areas. F lw1ornevkUnda1GENERAbB CCAgenda blenmsE terprise Zone lnaenth-Zd- 104 Board of County Commissioners December 31, 2012 *"" Page Six RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney recommends that the Board consider each of the above possible incentives, decide which it would like to pursue, and instruct staff to fully analyze each selected incentive for future con- sideration and possible adoption. ATTACHMENTS. Exhibit A— Diagram of the Enterprise Zone Exhibit B— Economic Development Initiatives Section, and Policy 2.2 of the Economic Development Element of the IRC 2030 Comprehensive Plan Exhibit C— FS 290.007 (State Incentives Statute) Exhibit D— FS 124.045 and FS 290.0135 (Statutes Authorizing County Incentives) Exhibit E— Draft minutes of Enterprise Zone Development Agency Meeting, November 8, 2012 ASP:LAC ••- Attachments, as noted F.W 11orneyiLb.d6General iB C C 4genda hfnnoslEnlerprise Zone Incentives 2.doc 105 EXHIBIT A Diagram of the Enterprise Zone FA4ttornev%Linda%GENER9LO C CWgenda AlenoslEnterprise Zone Incentives 1.doc 106 K, Le end .......... ........... .. ................ 7? ..... .................. %7' ................. T., - .i....- � -,_ ................. r-u ............ . ........ ............ ...... ... .............. ........... 53RD ST.(KJNGSBERRYRD) ne ...... ....... ................. 53 IRC Utility Service Area N, ......... iZ.i i i?i i i; .. .................... .............. ::::::� :..... .............. ....... ji:jjj 53R .................. . .... .P GSSERRYRD).. ....... D ST . ... ..............— . ......... 53RD ST ::::.......... ... ..................... ........ q ........ COVB Water Service Are ............ ............ .......................... ........... ........... ......... ...................... . 'DISTRICT ............... . ........ ........ NAME ..................... .......................... ....................... ............. .... ...... ..................... ....... ........ ........... .......... .................. .......... ..................... .. ........................ City of Vero Beach ............I............ ........ ........................ ....... ..... ...... ...... ...... ......... ....... ... ........ ............— ............. .... ......... ...... ......... .......... ........ .......................... .................... ...... (LINDSE ....... _::::49TH ST 7 ......... .......... ...................................... z ................. ............ ......... ....... .................. Lu ......... . ..... ...... ... ..... ... 0 ........... ........... .......... ... ........................ ............... .......... ...... ............... ... ...... ....-...........� ........ ... ...... ............... ............. ........... ..................... ..... ........ .............................. ......................... ........... .......... ........................ 0 .................... .......... ........... ................. ..... ... .......... ...; .......:::................ �k5T. i THER KiNG SLV0).:::;!::::::::::;45TH ST(N GIFFORD.RD)::: ....... .... ..... ..................-- *:�;;�...: ... ST MARTIN LU �k5T ............ :mT .......... ...... .....................;F:166� .............. ........... .............................. ...................... ...... ........ ........... ..... ...... .................... .......... ............ ........... ........................ ::: ::: ::: .�.......1............ .......................... .................. ......... .................. ... ........... ............. ............. . . .............. ------ ........ .......... .. .......I................. .......... ..... ....... ......... .......... .......... 41 ST ST:(COUNTY ROAD.630):: FF913q RD). zmmma m ............... ..... .............................. ::::...... ..................... .......... ....... ............. ......... ................ ............... ........ ......... I�............. ............... 20 ................................................. . ................ ............ .... 7................. ........... . ..................11 -Z ..............I...... ERAV):::::: .... .....................97TH ST(BARBER A ......... ...... ..... ......... .... ....................................... ....... ....... ....................... ........I........ ................... ....... ................. ........ ... .... ........... ............... ............... ....... ill:........ ...... is3, ............. _.QV3ROG An .......... RRILL .......... ME City 0 Vero Beach ... ......... ............. ... ............. ................ ..... ....... ..............w. .......... I 26TH ST P, (WALKER 6TH ST ...... ---- :1460 ...........—1 ........... R YAL PALM 80" ...................... spa .................. S.S, .......................... .......... 21 r QT ............... II 21 T T ................................. ..........:....... ........ ............ ...... (KIN EXHIBIT B Economic Development Incentives Section, and Policy 2.2 of the Economic Development Element of the IRC 2030 Comprehensive Plan F- tto—ALindaIGENFMLIB CCAgendo AfemosEnterprise Zone b—fives Idoc 108 Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Element family home, depending upon size. Impact fees are also required for various commercial and industrial uses. Library, School,and Park and Recreation impact fees do not apply to nonresidential uses. Currently,five of the county's eight impact fees are suspended to encourage construction and economic development. Water and sewer impact fees are established in a separate ordinance. While water impact fees are $1,300 for each equivalent residential unit, sewer impact fees are $2,796 for each equivalent residential unit. Deposits are also based on equivalent residential units. Within the City of Vero Beach,electric impact fees apply. For residential properties,electric impact fees are$550 per dwelling unit. For commercial/industrial properties, electric impact fees start at $550 per unit and increase depending on the estimated electricity demand of the proposed land use. Separate from impact fees, the County also has a prorated interest fee that is used to finance the widening of a portion of State Road 60. The interest fee is being charged to all developments that impact SR 60 between 66fl'Avenue and I-95. Economic Development Initiatives • Target Industries Currently, the Board of County Commissioners offers various financial incentives to target industries to encourage those industries to locate to Indian River County or to expand businesses already in the county. The County's target industries list includes manufacturing and other basic industries. Generally,the target industries are businesses that pay wages near or above the county's annual average wage.By targeting industries that pay higher than average wages,the County intends to improve the standard of living and employment opportunities of residents of the county. In 2006,there were 11,188 jobs within the County's targeted industries. Of those target industries, the fastest growing are service industries. While service industries,have been growing,only minimal gains have been made in basic/contributory industries (industries that bring money into the local economy by selling their products outside of the county) such as Fabricated Metal Products Manufacturing,Wood Products Manufacturing,Non-metallic Mineral Product Manufacturing,and Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing. Currently, the county offers financial incentives to target industries as follows: • Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund Program The Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund Program, administered through Enterprise Florida, provides a tax refund of up to$8,000 per new job if the business is located in the County's Enterprise Community Development Department Indian River County 26 109 Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Element Zone or up to $5,000 per new job if the business is located within the County, but outside the Enterprise Zone. To be eligible,the business must create at least ten new jobs in any of the state's target industries. Locally, the county provides a 20% match of the total taxes refunded. This program is designed to create high value-added jobs and encourage the growth of corporate headquarters and other targeted high value industries. • Local Jobs Grant Program This program can apply to a company that creates at least five jobs in the county's target industries. The amount of the grant is based on the number of jobs created and the average salary ofthose jobs. Each grant application is reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners. The County provides $3,000 for each new position created that pays from 75%to 99.99%of the County's average annual wage; $5,000 for each new position created that pays from 100% to 149.99% of the County's average annual wage; and $7,000 for each new position created that pays 150% or more of the County's average annual wage. In addition, a 10% bonus is provided to businesses that locate within the City of Vero Beach/Indian River County Enterprise Zone. • Impact Fee Financing Program An impact fee financing program is another incentive offered by Indian River County to encourage development. This program allows financing of impact fees for businesses listed on the county's target industries list. • Waiving County Utility Deposits Another incentive offered by Indian River County relates to county utility deposits. With this incentive, the county will guarantee county utility (county water and/or sewer) deposits of up to $10,000 for businesses meeting certain requirements. Instead of the business paying the deposit amounts up front,the county will pledge funds that can be drawn upon if necessary. • Special Incentives Granted by the Board Of County Commissioners The Board of County Commissioners has flexibility to grant special incentives on a case by case basis,based on job creation,wage levels and increased property taxes. Incentives could include the purchase or lease of land, infrastructure improvements,payment or financing of county impact fees, or cash incentives. In addition to incentives offered by the Board of County Commissioners, there are incentive programs offered by Workforce Solutions that can be accessed by employers relocating to the county or existing employers within the county that are expanding. Those incentive programs are as follows: Community Development Department Indian River County 27 110 Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Element o Local Training/Grant Assistance Workforce Solutions will provide on-the-job training to employers to offset the costs associated with new hires. The Grant serves as a cost effective way for local employers to hire quality applicants by reimbursing up to 50%of the employee's salary during their training period. o Employed Worker Training Grants Workforce Solutions will provide grants to reimburse employers for up to 50%of direct training costs to train current employees in new skills that may lead to greater productivity. The employer chooses the training that meets company needs. Grants may be accessed through Workforce Solutions. o Recruitment/Assessment Services At.no cost, Workforce Solutions will assist businesses in finding qualified candidates who are trained and equipped with the right skills to fill their positions. Professional Recruiters efficiently recruit, screen and refer only qualified applicants to open positions. Enterprise Zone In 2005, Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach jointly established an Enterprise Zone encompassing properties in and around the City of Vero Beach Municipal Airport and properties within the Gifford Community(see map). An Enterprise Zone is an area designation approved by the state to encourage new economic growth and investment in distressed areas. The state accomplishes this in part by providing tax incentives to residents and businesses within Enterprise Zones. Those tax incentives include: ■ Job Tax Credit(Sales Tax and Use Tax Credit or Corporate Income Tax Credit) ■ Sales Tax Refund(Refund of Sales Tax Paid on Certain Business Equipment/Materials) ■ Property Tax Credit(Applied to Corporate Income Tax) ■ Electrical Energy Sales Tax Exemption(Sales Tax Exemption on Electrical Energy) ■ Community Contribution Tax Credit(Florida Corporate Income Tax,Insurance Premium Tax, or Sales Tax Refund). Community Development Department Indian River County 28 111 Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Element Indian River County/City of Vera Beach Enterprise Zone Legend -Magor mmft Mks WE a�ravem 8sam v ass os _. e 2 $ �Entlerpr�st zcne -* �,a.x,�coudy Ptanring 0 ��ry 2�6 With the Enterprise Zone,Indian River County and the City of Vero Beach have the ability to offer state sponsored incentives to local companies. Those incentives are another tool that the County and City of Vero Beach have at their disposal to help retain and expand existing businesses and help to attract new businesses. Between October 1,2005(start of reporting period for the beginning of the City of Vero Beach/Indian River County Enterprise Zone) and September 30, 2007, 10 Building Material Sales Tax Refund applications and 25 Business Equipment Sales Tax Refund applications were submitted to the state. The amount of money invested in Building Materials and Business Equipment and the total amount of refunds requested were as follows: ■ $29,936.00 in Building Material Sales Tax Refunds were requested for businesses investing a total of$1,500,166.00 in Building Materials used in the Enterprise Zone; and Community Development Department Indian River County 29 112 Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Element ■ 33,248.00 in Business Equipment Sales Tax Refunds were requested for a total investment of $615,474.00 in Business Equipment. Research Coast In the late 1990's, a Memorandum of Understanding(MOU)was signed by the primary economic development organizations in Martin, St. Lucie, Okeechobee and Indian River Counties to coordinate economic development efforts as a region(Okeechobee County has since reorganized its economic development efforts and opted out of the MOU). That Memorandum of Understanding set the foundation for Martin County,St.Lucie County, and Indian River County to form the"Florida Research Coast Economic Development Coalition"to better promote the economic development objectives of the three counties. Currently,the Business Development Board ofMartin County,the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce,the Economic Development Council of St.Lucie County and Workforce Solutions are sharing resources to promote/advertise the three counties as a cohesive region.The research coast initiative is building upon recent efforts of all three counties and Workforce Solutions to recruit companies involved with the Life Science Industries. In fact, several life science companies have already located to St.Lucie County. One of those life science companies is Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies, a California based biotech company. Recently, Torrey Pines moved into a 100,000 square foot life sciences research facility on 20 acres of land in the Town of Tradition in St.Lucie County. More recently, Oregon Health and Science University's Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute(VGTI)moved into temporary facilities within the Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies,while VGTI is building its facility. Finally, the Mann Research Center is locating on a 22-acre site within the Town of Tradition. The life science companies locating to St.Lucie County were attracted there through a coordinated effort on the part of the business community along with state and local governments. For instance, Torrey Pines received a combined state and local incentive package of$88.5 million,plus 20 acres of donated land from Tradition developer Core Communities. That financial package requires Torrey Pines to provide 189 jobs within ten years. This equates to a direct financial incentive of $468,253.97 per job. Identification of the County's Constraints and Potentials As with any area, Indian River County has economic development constraints and economic development potentials. Generally, a constraint is a defined characteristic of an area that in some way hinders economic development. Conversely, a potential is a characteristic that supports or Community Development Department Indian River County 30 113 Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Element OBJECTIVE 2: Diversified Economic Growth Between 2010 and 2015,Indian River County will increase the number of jobs in the county's new high wage target industries by 1,000. Policy 2.1:The County shall focus its industrial/business/technology/research expansion efforts on attracting and expanding clean, small-scale light manufacturing and assembly industries. Policy 2.2: The county shall encourage the expansion of existing industries and attraction of new industries that are within the target industries list (Policy 2.5) by offering the following county adopted economic development incentives and assistance: ➢ Local Jobs Grant Program; ➢ Traffic, Water, and Sewer Impact Fee Financing; ➢ Utility Deposit Waivers; ➢ Expedited permitting; ➢ Maintenance of sufficient infrastructure capacity(roads, water, sewer); ➢ Provision of Industrial Revenue Bonds; Provision of job training through Indian River State College; ➢ Provision of workforce training incentives from the Workforce Development Board of the Treasure Coast(DBA Workforce Solutions); ➢ Assistance with federal or state grant applications(such as Community Development Block Grants); ➢ State Qualified Target Industry Tax Refund Program; and ➢ Tax Refunds and Tax Credits within the Enterprise Zone. Policy 2.3: The county planning division shall track the number of jobs in target industries annually and provide a report to the EDC. The report shall include,but not be limited to,the total number of jobs by NAICS target industry category,the average wage by each NAICS target industry category, the percent and numeric change from the prior year for both the total jobs and their average annual wages. Annual data shall be provided for multiple years. Policy 2.4: The Indian River County Chamber of Commerce and other economic development groups designated by the Board of County Commissioners shall provide assistance, as needed,to companies during the relocation process and report any actions taken to the Economic Development Council at their regular meetings. Policy 2.5:The county,in coordination with the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce,shall establish a list of target industries and evaluate this list annually in order to reflect the current economic needs of the county as well as the actual marketing results. The following is the list of the county's target industry clusters: Community Development Department Indian River County 45 114 EXHIBIT C ITS 290.007 (State Incentives Statute) F..14 aorneylLindalGENERALO C C14genda dfemoslEnterprise Zone Incentives I dec 115 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 1 Select Year: 2012 _ Go The 2012 Florida Statutes Title XIX Chapter 290 View Entire Chapter PUBLIC BUSINESS URBAN REDEVELOPMENT '290.007 State incentives available in enterprise zones.—The following incentives are provided by the state to encourage the revitalization of enterprise zones: (1) The enterprise zone jobs credit provided in s. 220.181. (2) The enterprise zone property tax credit provided in s. 220.182. (3) The community contribution tax credits provided in ss. 212.087 220.183, and 624.5105. (4) The sales tax exemption for building materials used in the rehabilitation of real property in enterprise zones provided in s. 212.08(5)(g). (5) The sales tax exemption for business equipment used in an enterprise zone provided in s. 212.08 (5)(h). (6) The sales tax exemption for electrical energy used in an enterprise zone provided in s. 212.08 (15). (7) The enterprise zone jobs credit against the sales tax provided in s. 212.096. (8) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the Public Service Commission may allow public utilities and telecommunications companies to grant discounts of up to 50 percent on tariffed rates for services to small businesses located in an enterprise zone designated pursuant to s. 290.0065. Such discounts may be granted for a period not to exceed 5 years. For purposes of this subsection, the term "public utility" has the same meaning as in s. 366.02(1) and the term "telecommunications company" has the same meaning as in s. 364.02(13). History.—s. 1, ch. 82-119; ss. 49, 57, ch. 84-356; s. 28, ch. 87-6; s. 71, ch. 87-243; s. 79, ch. 88-130; ss. 2, 20, ch. 91-262; ss. 28, 37, ch. 94-136; s. 66, ch. 2001-61;s. 23, ch. 2001-201; s. 23, ch. 2003-32; s.23, ch. 2005-132;s. 11, ch. 2005-287; s. 57, ch. 2011-36; s. 34,ch. 2011-64. 1 Note.—Repeated December 31, 2015, by s. 11, ch. 2005-287. Copyright©1995-2013 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us httn•//unxnu lea ctntP fl nc/RtatntPc/inrlPx nfm?Ann mnAP=T)icn1n-7 QtntiitP-e qPq rh C'tr;na= 1/7/7(11:116 EXHIBIT D FS 124.045 and FS 290.0135 (Statutes Authorizing County Incentives) Flow-e,�Lind.%GEA'FR4LO C CAgendn Af—.,s Enrerpri-Zone/ncen6—2d- 117 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 2 Select Year: 2012 Go The 2012 Florida Statutes Title A Chapter 125 View Entire COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COUNTY Chapter RELATIONS GOVERNMENT 125.045 County economic development powers.— (1) The Legislature finds and declares that this state faces increasing competition from other states and other countries for the location and retention of private enterprises within its borders. Furthermore, the Legislature finds that there is a need to enhance and expand economic activity in the counties of this state by attracting and retaining manufacturing development, business enterprise management, and other activities conducive to economic promotion, in order to provide a stronger, more balanced, and stable economy in the state; to enhance and preserve purchasing power and employment opportunities for the residents of this state; and to improve the welfare and competitive position of the state. The Legislature declares that it is necessary and in the public interest to facilitate the growth and creation of business enterprises in the counties of the state. (2) The governing body of a county may expend public funds to attract and retain business �.... enterprises, and the use of public funds toward the achievement of such economic development goals constitutes a public purpose. The provisions of this chapter which confer powers and duties on the governing body of a county, including any powers not specifically prohibited by law which can be exercised by the governing body of a county, must be liberally construed in order to effectively carry out the purposes of this section. (3) For the purposes of this section, it constitutes a public purpose to expend public funds for economic development activities, including, but not limited to, developing or improving local infrastructure, issuing bonds to finance or refinance the cost of capital projects for industrial or manufacturing plants, leasing or conveying real property, and making grants to private enterprises for the expansion of businesses existing in the community or the attraction of new businesses to the community. (4) A contract between the governing body of a county or other entity engaged in economic development activities on behalf of the county and an economic development agency must require the agency or entity receiving county funds to submit a report to the governing body of the county detailing how county funds were spent and detailing the results of the economic development agency's or entity's efforts on behalf of the county. By January 15, 2011, and annually thereafter, the county must file a copy of the report with the Office of Economic and Demographic Research and post a copy of the report on the county's website. (5)(a) By January 15, 2011, and annually thereafter, each county shall report to the Office of Economic and Demographic Research the economic development incentives in excess of $25,000 given to any business during the county's previous fiscal year. The Office of Economic and Demographic Research shall compile the information from the counties into a report and provide the report to the President of 11ttn•//tz7Axna7 lea ctate fl nc/RtnMtPc/index r.fm7Ann mnrie=T)i znlav CtatnteRTCearnh Qtrina= 1l/in,7 18 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :Online Sunshine Page 2 of 2 the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Department of Economic Opportunity. Economic development incentives include: 1. Direct financial incentives of monetary assistance provided to a business from the county or through an organization authorized by the county. Such incentives include, but are not limited to, grants, loans, equity investments, loan insurance and guarantees, and training subsidies. 2. Indirect incentives in the form of grants and loans provided to businesses and community organizations that provide support to businesses or promote business investment or development. 3. Fee-based or tax-based incentives, including, but not limited to, credits, refunds, exemptions, and property tax abatement or assessment reductions. 4. Below-market rate leases or deeds for real property. (b) A county shall report its economic development incentives in the format specified by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research. (c) The Office of Economic and Demographic Research shall compile the economic development incentives provided by each county in a manner that shows the total of each class of economic development incentives provided by each county and all counties. History.—s. 1,ch. 95-309; H.C.R. 2741 (1995); s. 1, ch. 2010-147; s. 19, ch. 2011-34; s. 51, ch. 2011-142. Copyright© 1995-2013 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us 119 httn•U vnv leu -,tnte flAnn mnrle=nicnlnv CtnbiteRTCParnh Ctrina= 1 Statutes& Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine Page 1 of 1 Select Year: 2012 Go The 2012 Florida Statutes Title XIX Chapter 290 View Entire Chapter PUBLIC BUSINESS URBAN REDEVELOPMENT 1290.0135 Local government ordinances; encouragements and incentives; review for adverse effects; certain changes prohibited.— (1)(a) It is the intent of the Legislature that each ordinance adopted by a local government possessing an approved enterprise zone after January 1, 1995, when applicable, provide encouragements and incentives to increase rehabilitation, renovation, restoration, improvement, or new construction of housing, and to increase the economic viability and profitability of business and commerce, located within enterprise zones designated pursuant to s. 290.0065. (b) Each local government possessing an approved enterprise zone may review its ordinances to determine which may have a negative impact upon the rehabilitation, renovation, restoration, improvement, or new construction of housing, or upon the economic viability and profitability of business and commerce, located within enterprise zones designated pursuant to s. 290.0065, and may waive, amend, or otherwise modify such ordinances so as to minimize the adverse impact. Such relief may include recommendations made by the United States Department of Housing and Urban .�. Development, in its "1987 Guide for Local Government and Developers," concerning zoning and subdivision ordinances, expedited administrative and processing procedures, site planning, streets, parking, sidewalks and walkways, curbs, gutters, storm drainage systems, sanitary sewers, water supply utilities and utility easements. (2) Nothing in this section authorizes any local government to waive, amend, provide exceptions to, or otherwise modify or alter any ordinance: (a) Which is expressly required to implement or enforce any statutory provision or the legislative intent thereof; (b) Which is designed to protect persons against discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, handicap, or marital status; or (c) The waiver, amendment, or modification of which is likely to present a significant risk to the public health, public safety, or the environment of the state. (3) The waiver, amendment, or modification of any ordinance pursuant to this section shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of chapter 120. (4) The provisions of this section shall not supersede any provision of chapter 163. History.—s.4, ch. 91-262; ss. 34, 37, ch. 94-136; s. 11, ch. 2005-287. 1 Note.—Repealed December 31, 2015, by s. 11, ch. 2005-287. Copyright©1995-2013 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us httn://www.Ieg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.efm?Ann mode=Disnlav Statute&Search String=__. 1/2/201 3O EXHIBIT E Draft Minutes of Enterprise Zone Development Agency Meeting, November 8, 2012 F.Ulto—TindakGE,NERALO C Cl4genda dfemosTnterprise Zone fncentines?.doc 121 ENTERPRISE ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY A meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) / City of Vero Beach (COVB) Enterprise Zone Development Agency (EZDA) was held on Thursday, November 8, 2012 at 8:30 a.m., in Conference Room B1-501 at the County Administration Building B, 180027 th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. Present were members: Penny Chandler, Chamber of Commerce, Vice Chairman Karl Zimmerman, Local Code Enforcement Milt Thomas, Member at Large Todd Westover, Member at Large Nicholas Rains, Member At Large Joseph Chiarella, Commercial Insurance Agent Godfrey Gipson, Non-Profit on EZ Eric Menger, Business in EZ Leroy Smith, Resident in EZ Brian Bauer, Workforce Development (Alternate for Richard Stetson) Absent Were: Richard Lane, Chairman; Law Enforcement (Excused) Tracy Carroll, City of Vero Beach Councilmember (Un-Excused) Others Present: Helene Caseltine, Chamber of Commerce Joseph E. Flescher, Commissioner Liaison Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney Laura E. Vasquez, Commissioner Assistant; District 2, & Recording Secretary Call to order Vice Chairman Chandler called the meeting to order at 8:38 a.m. at which time it was determined there was a quorum present. EZDA UN-APPROVED 1 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet n n Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc L L Approval of Minutes — October 11, 2012 (Action Required) ON MOTION BY Mr. Smith, SECONDED BY Mr. Zimmerman, the members voted unanimously (10-0) to approve the meeting minutes from October 11, 2012 as presented. Possible Local Incentives in the Enterprise Zone - Information and Discussion Alan S. Polackwich; County Attorney (No Action Required) Vice Chairman Chandler introduced Mr. Alan S. Polackwich; County Attorney. Attorney Polackwich referred to his report titled "Possible Local Enterprise Zone Incentives" included in the agenda packet and on file in the Commission office. Attorney Polackwich stated the Enterprise Zone extended partially in the County and the City. Under Florida law, the City was allowed to charge a utility tax on certain services rendered, including electricity and natural gas. This past summer the City of Vero Beach waived 50% of utility tax on those portions of the Enterprise Zone located within the City limits for businesses that meet certain criteria. Attorney Polackwich said that requirement triggered a Commissioner to bring an item to the Board of County Commissioners about whether the County could do something about franchise fees or something similar in the portions of the enterprise zone located within the County. He said there was a lengthy discussion on the topic. Attorney Polackwich reviewed all local incentives the County could possibly adopt into the Enterprise Zone. He would present all the incentives that may be workable and the Board would identify the goals they were interested in. Attorney Polackwich said he researched the listed items on his report by looking at the State Annual Report on Enterprise Zones, as well as from different resources, and what types of other local incentives existed or were being introduced in the State of Florida. He came up with a list of thirteen items. There was an internal staff meeting in which Helene Caseltine was present, the items were reviewed and determined that some items may already be in place or staff had not felt they were viable, the list was shortened to the eight items presented at today's meeting. Attorney Polackwich turned the committee's attention to the two Florida Statutes included in his report: EZDA UN-APPROVED 2 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 12 3 Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc FS 290.0135 language: "!t is the intent of the Legislature that each ordinance adopted by a local government possessing an approved Enterprise Zone after January `— 1, 1995, when applicable, provide encouragements and incentives...to increase the economic viability and profitability of business and commerce located within the Enterprise Zones designated pursuant to Section 290.0065...Each local government possessing an approved Enterprise Zone may review its ordinances to determine which may have a negative impact upon...the economic viability and profitability of business and commerce, located within the Enterprise Zones designated pursuant to Section 290.0065, and may waive, amend, or otherwise modify such ordinances so as to minimize the adverse impact." FS 125.045 language: "The governing body of a County may expend public funds to attract and retain business enterprises, and the use of public funds toward the achievement of such economic development goals constitutes a public purpose. The provisions of this chapter ... must be liberally construed in order to effectively carry out the purposes of this section ... for the purposes of this section, it constitutes a public purpose to expend public funds for economic development activities, including, but not limited to, developing or improving local infrastructure, issuing bonds to finance or re- finance the cost of capital projects for industrial or manufacturing plants, leasing or conveying real property, and making grants to private enterprises for the expansion of businesses existing in the community or the attraction of new businesses to the community." Attorney Polackwich stated the first Statute FS 290.0135, contained in his report °r- referred to what legislators authorized counties to create either by encouragements, or incentives, or to eliminate adverse impacts to development and expansion within the Enterprise Zone. Attorney Polackwich said Statute FS 125.045 was the general statement of the County's Economic Development powers. He said both statutes gave the authority to do most things under the name of incentives in the Enterprise Zone. The committee reviewed item #1 of the Possible New Local Incentives list. 1. Subsidize (in whole or in part) county impact fees (county would have to come up with funds to pay whatever amount the Enterprise Zone business does not pay) Attorney Polackwich stated impact fees were complicated and came down to the business not being required to pay more than their proportionate share of the cost of developing the infrastructure that was made necessary because they had come into the community. He said if a business was waived impact fees, the County would have to subsidize the impact fees from some other source. EZDA UN-APPROVED 3 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet n Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc L UNDER DISCUSSION: Vice-Chairman Chandler suggested the committee have a discussion on the possible negative impacts it would have to the County and future projects and opined there was no way of measuring potential future economic impacts. Attorney Polackwich remarked if a business were to move into the EZ from out of the zone and established a business, they would have to pay impact fees. He said if the County did not collect the impact fees, the County would have to make it up. He brought up the issue of how often that would happen and felt it was difficult to predict. He raised the question of how often a business would expand enough in such a way to call for new impact fees. Ms. Caseltine asked if this was only for projects in the unincorporated County. At which time Attorney Polackwich explained some impact programs were County-wide, so for example, transportation impact fees were collected for businesses expanding into the City because it was a County-wide program, and other impact fees were only in the County. He said the greatest impact fees were in transportation. Mr. Zimmerman asked if the shortfall would be made up out of the general fund. At which time Attorney Polackwich responded he felt they could be made up through fuel tax revenues (transportation) and thought other revenues like the one-cent sales tax. He said there could be other means of sources but usually the first place was the general fund. Attorney Polackwich stated it was complicated because if it came from fuel tax, the complicated formulas used to determine, what if any, was the proportionate share and what would be the amount of the impact fee to be paid. Attorney Polackwich said it was assumed the shortfall would come out of the general fund. Mr. Godfrey Gipson asked if this was applicable for new projects in established areas, or was it just for un-developed areas. Attorney Polackwich answered it would apply primarily for new businesses. Attorney Polackwich explained if a business were constructing a new building to house their business, whether or not it were in a developed area or un-developed area, the business would have to pay impact fees. Attorney Polackwich explained in some cases impact fees were based on square footage, for example, if you have a one-thousand square-foot building, the business would pay X amount in impact fees and a business that had two-thousand square-foot building would pay XX amount in impact fees based on that square footage. Attorney Polackwich explained if a business had a one-thousand square-foot business and would then expand to a two-thousand square foot-building the business would be required to pay the impact fees based on the expanded footage (one thousand feet). EZDA UN-APPROVED 4 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc 125 Commissioner Flescher said he was concerned about the fringe benefits of waiving impact fees to businesses that were not in the Enterprise Zone and had paid what they perceived as exorbitant fees to establish their business. He added in addition, if the business was logistically dependent on transportation vehicles would not be contained to the Enterprise Zone and they would be using the same road others had to pay for, and believed it would create more acrimony than benefit. Vice Chairman Chandler asked whether Attorney Polackwich wanted a consensus at the end of each item. He replied he felt it would not be fair for the committee to come to conclusions after viewing the report for the first time. He suggested the minutes reflect the comments from the committee. Attorney Polackwich said he would attach the minutes to the agenda under "Attorney Matters" to present to the Board. Mr. Zimmerman said he had the same concerns as Commissioner Flescher. He said it could cause a situation where groups opposing each other strictly over a very close association proximity to the border of the group and felt impact fees were an emotionally-charged issue in this County and had been for a long time. Mr. Zimmerman opposed the incentive to subsidize (in whole or in part) county impact fees. The general consensus of the committee was not in favor of: 1. Subsidize (in whole or in part) county impact fees (County would have to come up with funds to pay whatever amount the Enterprise Zone business does not pay). The committee reviewed item #2 of the possible New Local Incentives Report: 2. Low interest (or no interest) impact fee financing (impact fee financing is already in place, but interest rates would be lowered or waived in the Enterprise Zone. UNDER DISCUSSION Attorney Polackwich stated item #2 was basically a financing of impact fees. He said there was an impact fee financing in Utilities (water, sewer) and believed it was at 5.25%. Mr. Godfrey said he favored lowering interest rate but not financing. Mr. Eric Menger said he favored financing the impact fees but not lowering the interest rate, and felt it was good advertising for the Enterprise Zone. Mr. Zimmerman inquired whether there was a recapture provision in place for businesses that fail. Attorney Polackwich responded the business would sign a lien EZDA UN-APPROVED 5 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 12 6 Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\1 1-08-12.doc agreement and the County would then record a mortgage on the property. Commissioner Flescher inquired where the County was placed on receivership if there was a forfeit. Attorney Polackwich responded water/sewer liens were covered by a different statute which gave priority to the lien. He explained that if there were a mortgage on a property, water/sewer would generally have the same priority as Ad Valorem taxes. He further said other impact fees such as transportation etc., would have priority according to the date is was recorded because it was not covered by a similar statute. Commissioner Flescher inquired whether the agreement for utilities and transportation was separate or inclusive as one. Attorney Polackwich said he believed there would be a separate lien on water/sewer so as not to jeopardize its priority. Vice Chairman Chandler inquired if there was a length of time in which those funds must be used. Attorney Polackwich replied in the affirmative. Vice Chairman Chandler inquired if all the other impact fees except water/sewer were they all identical. Attorney Polackwich replied in the affirmative. A conversation ensued regarding the financing of impact fees. Attorney Polackwich stated that some financing was up to ten years. No one was clear how long water/sewer was financed. The general consensus of the committee was: 2. Low interest (or no interest) impact fee financing (impact fee financing was already in place, but interest rates would be lowered or waived in the Enterprise Zone. a. Lower interest rate on the impact fee financing in the Enterprise Zone General consensus of the committee was in favor b. Waiving on the financing fees within the Enterprise Zone General consensus was not in favor c. Interest rate should be the same interest rate the County generally charges General consensus was in favor The committee reviewed item #3 of the possible New Local Incentives Report 3. Subsidize (in whole or in part) or waive development fees (e.g., site plan application, concurrency application, etc) and/or building permit fees (because the Building Department is an enterprise fund, the County would have to come up with funds to pay whatever building permit fees the Enterprise Zone does not pay) EZDA UN-APPROVED 6 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 127 Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc UNDER DISCUSSION Mr. Godfrey said he would not be in favor of subsidizing (in whole or in part) or waiving development fees and/or building permit fees. Attorney Polackwich explained subsidizing building permit fees, was what the committee was reviewing. He said site plan applications and concurrency application fees were paid to the Planning Department which was funded out of general revenues, so the committee would not have to worry about subsidizing those fees. Attorney Polackwich said the Building Department was an enterprise fund so it survived on fees collected. He explained if the Building Department did not collect permit fees and inspection fees from businesses within the Enterprise Zone, the County would have to transfer funds from general revenues to the Building Department. A conversation ensued regarding the difficulties business owners in the Enterprise Zone had gone through for the incentives they thought were easily attainable to receive because they were in the Enterprise Zone. Chairman Chandler brought up a case in point regarding Oculina Bank and the hardship they went through with the Department of Revenue when they applied for their incentives. The general consensus of the committee was in favor: 3. The general consensus of the committee was to waive (in whole or in part) �-- development fees (e.g., site plan application, concurrency application, etc) and/or building permit fees (because the Building Department is an enterprise fund, the County would have to come up with funds to pay whatever building permit fees the Enterprise Zone does not pay) The Committee reviewed item #4 of the possible New Local Incentives Report 4. Subsidize (in whole or in part) water and sewer connection fees (because the Utilities Department is an enterprise fund, and because our Code and bond covenants prohibit any "free service" the County would have to come up with funds to pay whatever connection fees the Enterprise Zone does not pay) Attorney Polackwich recommended the committee discuss waiving water and sewer connection fees for businesses within the Enterprise Zone. He said it was not a large amount of money. He said the County would transfer funds from the Accounting Department to the Utilities Department. The general consensus of the committee was in favor. The general consensus of the committee was to waive water and sewer connection fees for businesses within the Enterprise Zone. EZDA UN-APPROVED 7 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 1v n Q Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc L The Committee reviewed item #5 of the possible New Local Incentives Report 5. Subsidize (in whole or in part, on a case by case basis) the cost of infrastructure improvements, replacement or re-location needed by the Enterprise Zone business to locate or expand in the Enterprise Zone. UNDER DISCUSSION Attorney Polackwich gave a brief explanation he said, if a business would want to move into the Enterprise Zone and there was not for example, utilities lines or infrastructure, the County could consider subsidizing (in whole or in part) paying some portion of the building infrastructure that was necessary. e.g., water/sewer lines leading to the property. Vice Chairman Chandler suggested perhaps a link on the County Website, the Chambers' website and other Councils' websites with a direct link to the Enterprise Zone, Which would show Ordinances' and/or Resolutions that have created the Enterprise Zone. Leroy Smith left at 9:35 a.m. The general consensus of the committee was in favor. -- Subsidizing (in whole or in part, on a case by case basis) the cost of infrastructure improvements, replacement or re-location needed by the Enterprise Zone business to locate or expand in the Enterprise Zone. The Committee reviewed item #6 of the possible new Local Incentives Report 6. Modify the jobs grant program to increase the amount of the grant for new jobs created in the Enterprise Zone. Currently, the amount is 10% greater than grants outside the Enterprise Zone; this amount could be increased to 20%, or some other figure. UNDER DISCUSSION Mr. Zimmerman recommended increasing the grant to 20%. Mr. Westover recommended raising the grant to 50%. The general consensus of the committee was in favor of Modifying the Jobs Grant Program to increase the amount of the grant, by either 20% or up to 50% for new jobs created in the enterprise Zone. EZDA UN-APPROVED 8 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 129 Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc The Committee reviewed item #7 of the possible new Local Incentives Report "r 1. Waive the Local Business Tax Receipt. UNDER DISCUSSION Attorney Polackwich said the Local Business Tax Receipt was formerly called the Business Tax Receipt. Attorney Polackwich said the Local Business Tax Receipt could be waived for a specified period of time. The general consensus of the committee was in favor of waiving the Local Business Tax Receipt for a specified time. The Committee reviewed item #8 of the possible new Local Incentives Report 8. Waive (in whole or in part) franchise or fee-in-lieu of franchise fee (water/sewer, electric, garbage, etc.) UNDER DISCUSSION Commissioner Flescher said the incentive should be consistent with the other `�— incentives that were already established. He said the period of time should be limited and felt three years was ample time to get a business up and running. Attorney Polackwich said this incentive would not apply to existing businesses. Mrs. Caseltine reminded the committee that the Enterprise Zone Development Agency was coming up for sun-setting review in 2015 as was the State's program. The general consensus of the committee was in favor of Waiving (in whole or in part) franchise or fee-in-lieu of franchise fee (water/sewer, electric, garbage, etc.) Mr. Westover mentioned incentive #5 and suggested a special fund be implemented Enterprise Zone Strategic Plan (Review and/or Revisions (Action Required) The Enterprise Zone Strategic Plan review was tabled until the next EZDA meeting on Thursday, December 13, 2012. Committee Member Items (No Action Required) EZDA UN-APPROVED 9 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 130 Fi les\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc Ms. Caseltine announced there would be a free Enterprise Zone Workshop on Thursday, November 29, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. the Indian River County Administration Building, located at 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL Public Discussion Items There was none. Adjournment There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 9:55 a.m. Next Meeting Date The next meeting date will be held on Thursday, December 13, 2012. EZDA UN-APPROVED 10 November 08, 2012 CADocuments and Settings\apolackwich\Local Settings\Temporary Internet 131 Files\Content.Outlook\5ERVKF3F\11-08-12.doc Attorney's Matters 1/8/13 Off,C of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners /k� FROM: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney1 THROUGH: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney DATE: January 2, 2013 SUBJECT: Sale of Surplus State Land — Indian River Correctional Institute At its August 21, 2012, meeting the Board approved a Resolution stating its interest in purchasing the former Indian River Correctional Institute property from the State of Florida. Administrative rules require the State to obtain an appraisal on surplus land prior to its sale. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of State Lands obtained appraisal quotes from four DEP approved appraisers. The lowest most responsible bidder was Steven Boyle of Boyle & Drake of Vero Beach, Florida with an appraisal cost of $8,991. The other appraisal quotes ranged from $24,500 to a not to exceed price of $46,000. If the County were to purchase the property, the County would be free to do as it pleases with the property. There would be no restrictions on the use of the property as is often times the case when purchasing environmentally sensitive land or lands bought with state grants. All of the former correctional institutes closed by the state last year have been declared surplus property and have been offered for sale via the appraisal method. For example, a larger, 250 acre former corrections surplus site in north Florida was recently appraised and while the appraisal report assigned significant value to the land, it also concluded that demolition of the structures (asbestos was found in several of the buildings) would be expensive. The conclusion of the appraisal established a final value of the property of less than $2,000 per acre. Should the Board decide not to proceed with obtaining an appraisal, it is likely we would lose any priority in purchasing the property as the County now enjoys an exclusive option to buy the property at the price established by the appraisal. . Indiav River Co. A oved Date iAdmin. KppROVED 1=4F� i=NTYTORNEY � � � co.Atty. 1 •z • 13 "' B.G.C. GENDABudget d rDept. /—•2 —/3 —� Risk Mgr. 132 MEMORANDUM — Correctional Institute January 2, 2013 Page 2 Since expressing its initial interest in purchasing the Correctional Institution property, staff has been advised that a long term lease of the property is permitted under administrative rule. The term of this lease would be for 50 years at lease rate of $300 per year. If the Board were to enter into a lease agreement for the property, a host of restrictions on the use of the property would arise. Administrative rules would require: • Public bid for any proposed tenants other than the County • Fair Market value rental terms • Proposed uses by the tenants similar to past uses • State approval of tenants and proposed uses • Prior approval of any alteration to existing buildings or improvements • preparation of a site specific operational report or management plan • a description of management needs of the property • a description of the management responsibilities of each lessee of the property • a statement of gross income generated, net income and expenses While a long term lease may be financially beneficial to the County, the restrictions imposed may make it difficult to find tenants willing to be subjected to these requirements. When discussing the possibility of a lease with representative of the Division of State Lands, it has been made clear that this site is offered for sale, not for .... lease and the only way to move forward with County acquisition of the property is through the appraisal method. Since the last time the Board discussed this matter in August, 2012, Indian River Charter School has expressed interest in using the property as a tenant of the County to possibly utilize the correction facilities for vocational programs such as food service or automobile repair. There is an existing gun range on the property and the Sheriff has expressed the Department's interest in utilizing this improvement. Funding: Funding for any appraisal would be transferred by a budget amendment from General Fund/Reserve for Contingency to General Fund/BCC/Other Professional Services —Acct #00110111-033190 Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board discuss whether it desires to proceed with purchase of the Correctional Institute property by hiring the appraiser and direct staff accordingly. Staff further recommends joint cooperation between the Sheriff's Department and the Charter High School to apportion responsibilities for maintenance and utilities should purchase of the facility become a reality. 133 vFR�� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IV a.. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT - BOARD MEMORANDUM cy \LpRrpA/ Date: December 31, 2012 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Thru: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Service From: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District ')J.yn. Change Order No. 1 to Mancil's Tractor Service, Inc. for Customer Convenience Subject: Center Paving Improvements (Bid No. 2012047) BACKGROUND: On June 12, 2012, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) approved the Engineer's Estimate by MBV Engineering, Inc. (MBV) in the amount of $159,500 to repave the Winter Beach, Roseland, and Gifford Customer Convenience Centers (CCC's). Subsequently, on August 21, 2012, the SWDD Board approved the award of Bid No. 20012047 to Mancil's Tractor Service, Inc. (Mancil) in the amount of$141,892.50. Mancil started the project on September 17, 2012 and substantially completed the paving of all three stations ahead of schedule on October 18, 2012. However, during the Engineer's final inspection of the Gifford CCC paving, it became evident that some portions of the paving needed to be redone due to the possibility of a sub-base issue. After reviewing the required Geotechnical testing report by Mancil as well as additional independent testing by KSM Engineering, MBV has concluded that there may be pockets of moisture deeper under the base and sub-base materials that contributed to the isolated failures of the newly placed asphalt at the Gifford CCC. The most likely explanation is the past use of the site which is the former Gifford Road landfill. Therefore, MBV has provided the attached recommendation letter with a request for a change order to Mancil in the amount of$12,500 to adequately repair the failed areas. ANALYSIS: Overall, Mancil did a great job in paving the three centers and we have received positive feedback from our customers. Since the problem could not have been foreseen and based on the latest findings and soils data, staff supports MBV's recommendation and request to issue a change order to Mancil for the repair work at the Gifford CCC. The additional $12,500 would bring the contract amount to $154,392.50, an 8.8% increase, which is still below the original Board approved engineer's estimate of$159,500. ACCOUNT INFORMATION: The repaving project was undertaken in the past fiscal year as an emergency item and was SWDD Agenda-Change Order No I to Mancil's Tractor Service CCC Paving Improvements Page—I— 134 approved for funding as a budget amendment by the Board on July 3, 2012 under the SWDD Recycling Convenience Center Repaving account. . DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT NO AMOUNT SWDD Recycling—Convenience 41125534-044699-12010 $12,500.00 Center Repaving RECOMMENDATION: SWDD staff recommends its Board approve the following: 1. Approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $12,500 to Mancil's Tractor Service associated with the paving repair work at the Gifford Customer Convenience Center. 2. Authorize the approval of a budget amendment to cover Change Order No. 1 in the amount of$12,500. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Pavement Repair Recommendation Letter from MBV APPROVED FOR AGENDA: Indian River Co. Approved Date Administration By: 4 SWDD I 31 IZ Jose A. Baird, County Administrator z , SWDD F O �Q/J� Budget I V2113 Date Legal ( • t3 SWDD Agenda-Change Order No 1 to Mancil's Tractor Service CCC Paving Improvements Page—2— 135 MMBV ENGINEERING, INC. f'n1A BOWLES VILLAMIZAR&ASSOCIATES i v.mbveng.com cA93728 f December 30, 2012 I I Mr. Himanshu Mehta,P.E. { Managing Director Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District 1325 74"' Ave. SW Vero Beach, FL 32968' Subject: Indian:River County SWDD Customer Convenience Centers Gifford CCC—Pavement Repair Recommendation Indian River County, Florida l Engineer's Project Number: 12-156 Dear Mr.Mehta: Please find this letter as our recommendation for the Gifford CCC pavement repair due to the underlying moisture issue that is prevalent at the aforementioned Customer Convenience Center. Upon review of the soils investigation by KSM. Engineering for the (3) core boring locations taken within the pavement failure areas, and through discussions with County staff that this site was once utilized as a landfill, it is our understanding that there may be pockets of moisture deeper under the base and sub-base materials that contributed to the isolated failures of the newly placed asphalt. Since this problem could not have been foreseen, and upon our latest findings and soils data, it is our: recommendation that the contractor install a revised pavement section removing an additional 7" of existing base material (10" in total) and replace it with 10" of limerock or coquina, compacted to the recommendations by the soils firm, then overlaid with 2" of SP 12.5 asphalt. This repair detail will provide a "bridge" between the existing subsurface material and the asphalt. As the proposed remediation is outside the original contractor's scope of work, we recommend that additional services in the amount of $12,500 (see attached Exhibit A) be authorized to Mancil's 'Tractor Services, Inc. for completion of this effort. Please note that the original contract amount of$141,892.50 for the (3) Centers did not include a contingency. This was due to the fact that this project was not originally in the County's budget and was undertaken with emergency funds. In order to be mindful of this situation and good stewards of our tax dollars, the 10% contingency commonly used for situations like this was not requested in the original contract amount. The new contract amount, should the additional finds be approved, will be $154,392.50, an 8.8% increase, but still under the normal 10% contingency threshold commonly utilized for projects. Therefore, pursuant to the above summary and recent findings, we hereby recommend $12,500 of additional construction fluids be approved to Mancil's Tractor Services, Inc. for the final remediation activities for the above referenced Customer Convenience Center. 1835 20th Street 1600 W Eau Gallie Blvd,Suite 203 806 Delaware Avenue Vero Beach,FL 32960 Melbourne,FL 32935 Ft.Pierce,FL 34950 772,569.0035 321253,1510 772.468.9055 Fax:772.7783617 Fax:321.253.091 1 Fax:772.778.3617 136 e MEN Mr. Himanshu Mehta,P.E. December 30, 2012 Page 2 Should you have any questions regarding the above subject, or require any further information please do not hesitate to contact us at our office. Sincerely, e i -Todd Howder Project Manager TH/jeli f 137 P,x4tat-r A MancilDs tractor Service, Inc. "We Move the Earth" Site Contractor;Earthwork,Roadways, Water and Drainage 4551 SE Hampton Ct.,Stuart,FL 34997 Phone(772)288-0951 Fax(772)288-0983 CHANGE ORDER #1 DATE: 12/18/2012 BID TO: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NAME: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE ATTN:TODD HOWDER PER PLANS: PHONE:(772)569-0035 VERSIONIDATE: EMAIL:toddh@mbveng.com WE RESPECTFULLY SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING CHANGE ORDER TO COVER THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBGRADE AND BASEROCK REPAIRS. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY UNIT COST TOTAL 1 REMOVE ASPHALT FOR REPAIR AREAS SY 400 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BASEROCK AND 2 SUBGRADE MATERIAL(10"DEPTH) SY 400 INSTALL AND COMPACT ADDITIONAL BASEROCK MATERIAL3 (PROVIDED BY OWNER) SY 400 TOTAL FOR ITEMS 1 THORUGH 3 $12,500.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT = $141,892.50 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS = $0.00 APPROVALS STILL PENDING $0.00 CONTRACT TOTAL PRIOR TO THIS CHANGE ORDER = $141,892.50 CONTRACT CHANGE DUE TO THIS CHANGE ORDER = $12,500.00 NEW CONTRACT TOTAL INCLUDING THIS CHANGE ORDER = $154,392.50 TERMS&CONDITIONS: THIS CHANGE ORDER IS SUBJECT TO THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL PROJECT PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY: ACCEPTED BY: NAME: TITLE: DON R.MANCIL,JR. DATE: DMS/ss APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SMPFTCMNCY B ALA S.POLACKWICH CO NTY ATTORNEY Page 1 of 1 138