Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05/21/2013 (3)
PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING JUNE 1 THROUGH JUNE 7, 2013 AS JUSTIN RINEY APPRECIATION WEEK MW WHEREAS, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners are dedicated to the protection of the Indian River Lagoon and conservation of our water resources; and WHEREAS, Justin Riney, an Indian River County resident and Mother Ocean, Inc., founder whose mission is to celebrate the unique resources of Florida's waterways and promote awareness and conservation through the Expedition Florida 500 Project; and WHEREAS, Justin Riney embarked on a paddle board on January 1, 2013 to circumnavigate the Florida Peninsula from Pensacola to Jacksonville by July 4, 2013 and then spend the next six months on the inner waterways ending in Tallahassee on December 31, 2013;and WHEREAS, Justin Riney is not only celebrating the founding of Florida 500 years ago by Ponce De Leon but raising awareness of the unique resources we have in our state and how we can all help to preserve and protect them for the next 500 years; and WHEREAS, Justin Riney has been organizing cleanups throughout his journey to educate, inspire and empower Floridians to become involved and passionate about our natural resources one step and one paddle at a time; and WHEREAS, the Board encourages all residents of Indian River County to come celebrate the rpedition Florida 500 Project with Justin Riney on Sunday, June 2nd at Waldo's in Vero Beach at x.00 a.m.; and WHEREAS, the Board wishes to express their appreciation to Justin Riney for all his efforts so far and wish him a safe journey. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the week of June 1 through ', 2013 be designated as JUSTIN RINEY APPRECIATION WEEK in Indian River County. Duly adopted this 21St day of May 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA t, Josed E. Flescher, Chairman Wfes* S. Davi ice Chairman Peter D. O' Bryan *S Bob Solari Na - �., Tim�2or 1'y. N'1 : OCEAN NOOK CLEAN b '� $PM-MIDNIGHT '. XFSOO HpMECQ NG CELIr$TIA .BibE STAR WINE BAR,925 BOUGAINVILLEATANE, VERO $EACH 32963 ' 1 x • '�. UNE `' <• �.x't •� +•. ;yr;,a �'- ; I,r r = ..: SUNDAY ' ..Y. .!. , S ` , � � 9-LOAM : BEACH CLEANUP' �. �` 10AM-12PI►i : XFSOO CELEBRATION7%. WALDO's 3150 OCEAN DH VERO BEACH, FL 32963 4 •'lye,- 3,.s +- r,. �.` ��. 4' S� ;� /OV '.� � ',w � .t-_ •ks*�c • -� . . . • l *�l. Mir � � \ '��. �� °fir �.y �'i' 1 �.�y`yJY� J�. .� � _ r �� � �•., �, l'• ! i. t# ' -1 S,JOHNS WOOS NjA � �i�•$� , i., '�tA �a`�-!3". g �1' �,- •y��9��i .a.. _. 'TA. p �+4. .'�,t:'+'s �• ir'1'�s..�.*'.�,-.. _,..r.el� .y..�....:,.�.a+.7+^.. • _ _ ..,,�,,._.: � :JVD' � .r..� � ... �t PROCLAMATIONFF DESIGNATING MAY 19 - 25, 2013 AS TOURISM WEEK IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WHEREAS, the travel and tourism industry supports the vital interests of Indian River County, contributing to our employment, prosperity, international trade and relations, understanding and goodwill; and WHEREAS, people from all over the world are aware of the outstanding visitor resources available in Indian River County; and WHEREAS, Indian River County has attracted visitors for many decades and we recognize the visitor industry as a key element of our own county's economic stability and success; and WHEREAS, the most current figures from the U.S. Travel Association show Indian River County benefits from over $300 million in annual travel spending a year; and WHEREAS, statistics from the U.S. Travel Association show that 4,460 people are employed locally in our County's visitor industry; and WHEREAS, Indian River County has a total travel generated payroll of$93,230,000; and i WHEREAS, Indian River County bed taxes totaled $1,609,884 during the last fiscal year contributing to our ability to market tourism and re-nourish our beaches; and WHEREAS, given these laudable contributions travel and tourism bring to th , wel'-being Indian River County, it is fitting that we recognize the importance of travel and tourism. SIONERS OF NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED E HE WEEK OFY THE OF MAY 10UNTY 9 25, 2013 M EISDESIG DESIGNATED INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT AS TOURISM WEEK IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. Adopted this 21St day of May, 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ER o e' h E. Flescher, Chairman AVcp c Chairman W�s y S. Davis, V * * Peter D. O'Bryan olari Tim= c PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MAY 27, 2013 AS MEMORIAL DAY WHEREAS, Memorial Day was first observed on May 30, 1868 when flowers were placed on the graves of Union and Confederate soldiers at Arlington National Cemetery; and WHEREAS, on Memorial Day we pause collectively for a moment of reverence, reflecting on the heroics of those who answered when called by their country to bear arms and to protect and preserve the ideals of democracy; and WHEREAS, Memorial Day is a cherished tradition in our nation and its observance helps us appreciate our history, our values, and our responsibilities by reminding us that freedom is not free; and WHEREAS, the Veterans Council of Indian River County, consisting of about 20 veteran organizations representing over 18,000 veterans residing in the county, is holding Memorial Day ceremonies at Veterans Memorial island Sanctuary on Monday; May 27, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. and the Veterans Memorial in Riverview Park, Sebastian at 11:00 a.m. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that May 27, 2013 be designated as MEMORIAL DAY and the Board urges all its resideits to attend Memorial Day ceremonies at Veterans Memorial island Sanctuary at 9;00 a.m. aria ,ne Veterans Memorial in Riverview Park in Sebastian at 11:00 a.m. on Monday, May 27, 2013. Adopted this 21St day of May, 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA V ,,,ta0eph E. Flescher, Chairman � co ey . Davis, Vice C airman * * Peter D. O'Bryan 0 �LORIO�' f J 6a A BOA\I Tim Zor-e- g7k ,JEFFREY R. SMITH Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller * <. 1 801 27TH Street �ZpRIpA Vero Beach, Florida 3 2961 -1028 Telephone (772) 226-1945 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY,COMMISSIONERS DATE: May 9, 2013 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS May 3, 2013 to May 9, 2013 FROM: DIANE BERNARDO - FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of May 3, 2013 to May 9, 2013. Attachment: DB: MS CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 297970 5/6/2013 COMPBENEFITS COMPANY 236.54 297971 5/6/2013 COLONIAL LIFE&ACCIDENT INS CO 105.96 297972 5/6/2013 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE CO 14,839.50 297973 5/6/2013 ALLSTATE 668.84 297974 5/6/2013 MUTUAL OF OMAHA 6,498.68 297975 5/8/2013 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 142.32 297976 5/8/2013 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 50.00 297977 5/8/2013 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 277.30 297978 5/8/2013 MISDU MICHIGAN STATE 445.75 297979 5/8/2013 NEW JERSEY FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER 308.00 297980 5/8/2013 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 203.51 297981 5/8/2013 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 206.27 297982 5/8/2013 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 115.09 297983 5/9/2013 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 1,038.35 297984 5/9/2013 STURGIS LUMBER&PLYWOOD CO 2.99 297985 5/9/2013 JORDAN MOWER INC 672.65 297986 5/9/2013 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 349.94 297987 5/9/2013 LENGEMANN CORP 1,398.00 297988 5/9/2013 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 521.90 297989 5/9/2013 COPYCO INC DBA 545.36 297990 5/9/2013 RICOH USA INC 415.07 297991 5/9/2013 CHISHOLM CORP OF VERO 1,896.50 297992 5/9/2013 KIMLEY HORN&ASSOC INC 1,200.00 297993 5/9/2013 RUSSELL CONCRETE INC 995.50 297994 5/9/2013 AT&T WIRELESS 1,330.85 297995 5/9/2013 AT&T WIRELESS 1,805.15 297996 5/9/2013 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC 85.95 297997 5/9/2013 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 437.96 297998 5/9/2013 E-Z BREW COFFEE&BOTTLE WATER SVC 78.87 297999 5/9/2013 TEMPLE INC 111.50 298000 5/9/2013 DEMCO INC 97.96 298001 5/9/2013 DAILY COURIER SERVICE 1,090.00 298002 5/9/2013 INDIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER 454.42 298003 5/9/2013 WILD LAND ENTERPRISES INC 125.35 298004 5/9/2013 HACH CO 273.42 298005 5/9/2013 AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INC 472.16 298006 5/9/2013 RELIABLE SEPTIC AND SERVICE 4,850.00 298007 5/9/2013 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD 4,937.30 298008 5/9/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL 235.89 298009 5/9/2013 EGP INC 7,471.71 298010 5/9/2013 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 82.01 298011 5/9/2013 BRODART COMPANY 115.00 298012 5/9/2013 BILLS TV SERVICE CENTER INC 680.00 298013 5/9/2013 PROFORMA IMAGING 44.28 298014 5/9/2013 FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE 269.62 298015 5/9/2013 BARTH CONSTRUCTION INC 166,576.96 298016 5/9/2013 PHILIP VANVYNCKT 700.00 A 298017 5/9/2013 XEROX CORP SUPPLIES 1,405.17 N 298018 5/9/2013 GENERAL PART INC 821.42 298019 5/9/2013 BLAKESLEE SERVICES INC 760.00 298020 5/9/2013 BAKER&TAYLOR INC 3,265.68 298021 5/9/2013 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 861.17 298022 5/9/2013 LOWES CO INC 1,619.16 298023 5/9/2013 MICROMARKETING LLC 214.90 298024 5/9/2013 K&M ELECTRIC SUPPLY 58.20 298025 5/9/2013 RELIABLE POLY JOHN 60.46 298026 5/9/2013 SUNSHINE REHABILATION CENTER OF IRC INC 30.00 298027 5/9/2013 PARKS AND SON INC 4,439.14 1 d CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 298028 5/9/2013 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 356.85 298029 5/9/2013 CITY OF VERO BEACH 58,647.93 298030 5/9/2013 LSQ FUNDING GROUP L C 9,024.00 298031 5/9/2013 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 51.50 298032 5/9/2013 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC 12,667.69 298033 5/9/2013 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 1,152.16 298034 5/9/2013 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 46.90 298035 5/9/2013 WAL MART STORES EAST LP 115.67 298036 5/9/2013 SAN MARCO IN'T'L INC 198.69 298037 5/9/2013 MARRIOTT FT LAUDERDALE NORTH 417.00 298038 5/9/2013 ROGER CLEVELAND GOLF INC 377.52 298039 5/9/2013 FLORIDA WATER&POLLUTION CONTROL 345.00 298040 5/9/2013 INDIAN RIVER HABITAT 8,822.42 298041 5/9/2013 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 57,866.25 298042 5/9/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS 16.02 298043 5/9/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS 64.94 298044 5/9/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS 127.18 298045 5/9/2013 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 553.54 298046 5/9/2013 DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING&TESTING 7,656.00 298047 5/9/2013 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 63,900.00 298048 5/9/2013 LITTER GITTER INC 106.00 298049 5/9/2013 SOUTHEAST DESALTING ASSOCIATION 370.00 298050 5/9/2013 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 903.48 298051 5/9/2013 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 6,311.88 298052 5/9/2013 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 1,898.25 298053 5/9/2013 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 317.50 298054 5/9/2013 ACUSHNET COMPANY 900.80 298055 5/9/2013 STATEATTORNEY 3,795.92 298056 5/9/2013 CITY OF FELLSMERE 188.19 298057 5/9/2013 US KIDS GOLF LLC 924.94 298058 5/9/2013 GLOBAL GOLF SALES INC 418.14 298059 5/9/2013 STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES 425.00 298060 5/9/2013 JOSEPH A BAIRD 555.00 298061 5/9/2013 COX GIFFORD SEAWINDS 425.00 298062 5/9/2013 EMERGENCY VEHICLE TECHNICIAN 110.00 298063 5/9/2013 EMERGENCY VEHICLE TECHNICIAN 425.00 298064 5/9/2013 COUNTY VETERAN SERVICE OFFICERS 70.00 298065 5/9/2013 NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH SPORTS 200.00 298066 5/9/2013 ALAN C KAUFFMANN 25.00 298067 5/9/2013 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING LLC 34,837.00 298068 5/9/2013 COMCAST 67.00 298069 5/9/2013 COMCAST 100.28 298070 5/9/2013 IDEA GARDEN ADVERTISING 150.00 298071 5/9/2013 DONADIO AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 175.00 298072 5/9/2013 C&C ELECTRIC WORKS INC 3,682.00 298073 5/9/2013 LAKEWOOD VILLIAGE RO ASSOC INC 500.00 298074 5/9/2013 DAVCO ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS CORP 5,238.78 298075 5/9/2013 HOMETOWN NEWS 359.00 298076 5/9/2013 PEAK TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 750.00 298077 5/9/2013 W S DARLEY&COMPANY 1,488.20 298078 5/9/2013 ANDRITZ SEPARATION INC 94.74 298079 5/9/2013 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 470.61 298080 5/9/2013 POTTERS INDUSTRIES LLC 2,760.00 298081 5/9/2013 FLORIDA DEPT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE 45,842.31 298082 5/9/2013 ALAN HILL 479.79 298083 5/9/2013 OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER 375.75 298084 5/9/2013 MBV ENGINEERING INC 22,621.25 298085 5/9/2013 CENTRAL PUMP&SUPPLY INC 56.39 298086 5/9/2013 BEACHLAND CLEANING SERVICE 837.00 298087 5/9/2013 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 15,563.22 2 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 298088 5/9/2013 GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 51,966.31 298089 5/9/2013 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPE 78.00 298090 5/9/2013 1 ST FIRE&SECURITY INC 282.00 298091 5/9/2013 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 457.16 298092 5/9/2013 NORMAN GOODMAN 90.00 298093 5/9/2013 PETER OBRYAN 380.50 298094 5/9/2013 COMMUNICATIONS BROKERS&CONSULTANTS INC 6.80 298095 5/9/2013 L I TREE SERVICE 710.00 298096 5/9/2013 AIRVAC INC 621.84 298097 5/9/2013 MARY COLLIS 30.00 298098 5/9/2013 JOHNNY B SMITH 25.00 298099 5/9/2013 MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS INC 7,661.05 298100 5/9/2013 CEMEX 1,020.69 298101 5/9/2013 REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC 2,219.47 298102 5/9/2013 BRIAN FREEMAN 30.57 298103 5/9/2013 SUNSHINE FURNITURE 598.00 298104 5/9/2013 TERRI COLLINS LISTER 15.59 298105 5/9/2013 SALS INC 18.00 298106 5/9/2013 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 901.96 298107 5/9/2013 WILLIAM RICE 273.79 298108 5/9/2013 MARINCO BIOASSAY LABORATORY INC 3,600.00 298109 5/9/2013 MICHELLE VAN KEULEN 475.00 298110. 5/9/2013 YOUNGS MARKET 200.00 298111 5/9/2013 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 1,650.00 298112 5/9/2013 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC 600.00 298113 5/9/2013 WILLIAM BOLTON 20.00 298114 5/9/2013 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK 7.68 298115 5/9/2013 HOUCORP INC 200.00 298116 5/9/2013 GLISSON&CO INC 1,020.00 298117 5/9/2013 INSTRUMENT SPECIALTIES INC 163.67 298118 5/9/2013 LYON FINANCIAL SERVICES INV 271.70 298119 5/9/2013 INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY LLC 80,666.58 298120 5/9/2013 STERLING WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC 17,820.64 298121 5/9/2013 KEMPER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 9.32 298122 5/9/2013 GUETTLER BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION LLC 332,784.15 298123 5/9/2013 JULIE NORMAN 90.00 298124 5/9/2013 HUGHES ASSOCIATES INC 800.00 298125 5/9/2013 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 312.00 298126 5/9/2013 TRUE AUTOMATION INC 100,000.00 298127 5/9/2013 DELRAY MOTORS 965.07 298128 5/9/2013 LINDSAY ADAMS 173.37 298129 5/9/2013 FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING INC 2,833.33 298130 5/9/2013 PEGGY CARDELL&ASSOCIATES 442.00 298131 5/9/2013 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 550.00 298132 5/9/2013 A/R/C ASSOCIATES INC 1,327.13 298133 5/9/2013 ELAINE KANE 120.00 298134 5/9/2013 GOLD MEDAL PRODUCTS 368.00 298135 5/9/2013 WRIGHT EXPRESS FSC 22,118.88 298136 5/9/2013 YP LLC 159.00 298137 5/9/2013 B&E PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 775.00 298138 5/9/2013 BETHANY BURT 60.00 298139 5/9/2013 WILD TURKEY ESTATES OF VERO LLC 1,925.70 298140 5/9/2013 LINDA GRAHAM 150.00 298141 5/9/2013 FLORIDA TIME CLOCK 630.45 298142 5/9/2013 REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC 5.76 298143 5/9/2013 REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC 7.20 298144 5/9/2013 REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC 9.36 298145 5/9/2013 ANDREW SITEWORK LLC 49,169.70 298146 5/9/2013 CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC 991.60 298147 5/9/2013 CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC 1,547.99 3 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 298148 5/9/2013 RHONDA FRIEND 50.00 298149 5/9/2013 BRIANNA BAUM 50.00 298150 5/9/2013 AKIE LOKA 50.00 298151 5/9/2013 ALCURT VERO BEACH LLC 499.40 298152 5/9/2013 EMERALD TITLE GROUP INC ESCROW ACCOUNT 26.26 298153 5/9/2013 DEAN MEAD ET AL/ESCROW AGENT 8,000.00 298154 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 191.13 298155 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 37.46 298156 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 20.95 298157 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 59.80 298158 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 93.60 298159 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 138.06 298160 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 115.30 298161 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 64.44 298162 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 39.32 298163 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 36.34 298164 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 131.19 298165 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 72.44 298166 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 57.67 298167 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 42.88 298168 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 29.39 298169 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 107.71 298170 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 123.96 298171 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 5.60 298172 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 5.85 298173 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 21.88 298174 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 62.93 298175 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 28.40 298176 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 41.23 298177 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 5.30 298178 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 61.38 298179 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 4.66 298180 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 10.62 298181 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 57.79 298182 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 26.56 298183 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 22.73 298184 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 90.42 298185 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 44.34 298186 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 53.80 298187 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 49.42 298188 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 37.21 298189 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 58.75 298190 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 8.51 298191 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 13.23 298192 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 64.60 298193 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 37.57 298194 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 70.75 298195 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 34.42 298196 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 30.47 298197 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 54.34 298198 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 34.66 298199 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 73.76 298200 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 49.60 298201 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 24.07 298202 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 58.21 298203 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 68.63 298204 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 261.64 cw 298205 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 69.02 298206 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 56.56 298207 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 15.85 4 7 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 298208 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 37.56 298209 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 14.92 ® 298210 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 36.02 298211 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 29.17 298212 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 6.54 298213 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 521.79 298214 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 24.40 298215 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 15.57 298216 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 28.74 298217 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 47.07 298218 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 34.65 298219 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 61.44 298220 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 67.74 298221 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 39.58 298222 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 31.79 298223 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 20.12 298224 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 38.35 298225 5/9/2013 UT REFUNDS 27.52 298226 5/9/2013 STEWART MINING INDUSTRIES INC 325.54 Grand Total: 1,321,788.94 5 R ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 2415 5/2/2013 FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM 296,026.63 2416 5/3/2013 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMIN 13,173.89 2417 5/3/2013 JMC SERVICES INC 41,853.85 2418 5/3/2013 KIMLEY HORN&ASSOC INC 425.00 2419 5/7/2013 SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION 266,743.75 Grand Total: 618,223.12 1 A ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS.NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1001480 5/3/2013 AT&T 100.58 1001481 5/3/2013 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 2,043.50 1001482 5/3/2013 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 2,576.00 1001483 5/6/2013 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 145.90 1001484 5/6/2013 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 31.80 1001485 5/6/2013 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 361.70 1001486 5/6/2013 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 1,520.30 1001487 5/6/2013 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 182.23 1001488 5/6/2013 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 569.81 1001489 5/6/2013 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC 977.75 1001490 5/6/2013 SVI SYSTEMS INC 149.50 1001492 5/6/2013 DYNAMIC BRANDS LLC 147.30 1001493 5/6/2013 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 447.10 1001494 5/6/2013 AUTO PARTNERS LLC 1,289.69 1001495 5/6/2013 CON-AIR INDUSTRIES INC 60.96 1001496 5/6/2013 S&S AUTO PARTS 137.64 1001497 5/6/2013 EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER 46.00 1001498 5/6/2013 BERMUDA SANDS APPAREL LLC 1,039.17 1001499 5/8/2013 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 560.36 1001500 5/8/2013 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 44.30 1001501 5/8/2013 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 866.90 1001502 5/8/2013 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 3,325.75 1001503 5/8/2013 MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 55.00 1001504 5/8/2013 THE EXPEDITER 410.73 1001505 5/8/2013 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 63.51 1001506 5/8/2013 DEERE&COMPANY 147.34 1001507 5/8/2013 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 205.36 1001508 5/8/2013 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 3,357.71 1001509 5/8/2013 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST PUBLISHING LLC 143.83 1001510 5/8/2013 ESRI INC 3,030.00 1001511 5/8/2013 STRYKER SALES CORP 764.62 1001512 5/8/2013 RECHTIEN INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 152.81 1001513 5/8/2013 AUTO PARTNERS LLC 216.15 1001514 5/8/2013 L&L DISTRIBUTORS 16.20 1001515 5/8/2013 S&S AUTO PARTS 54.92 1001516 5/9/2013 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST LLC 345.05 1001517 5/9/2013 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 17.02 1001518 5/9/2013 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 539.38 1001519 5/9/2013 LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC 350.28 1001520 5/9/2013 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 125.95 1001521 5/9/2013 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 73.75 1001522 5/9/2013 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 419.79 1001523 5/9/2013 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORP 5,521.45 1001524 5/9/2013 HOMELAND IRRIGATION 75.68 1001525 5/9/2013 HILL MANUFACTURING CO INC 217.00 1001526 5/9/2013 WORLD INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT INC 125.00 1001527 5/9/2013 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 181.20 1001528 5/9/2013 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 523.86 1001529 5/9/2013 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 2,711.13 1001530 5/9/2013 ESRI INC 1,515.00 1001531 5/9/2013 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 269.77 1001532 5/9/2013 WACO FILTERS CORPORATION 259.50 1001533 5/9/2013 S&S AUTO PARTS 960.12 1001534 5/9/2013 HYDRA SERVICE(S)INC 283.00 1001535 5/9/2013 WRIGHT FASTENER COMPANY LLC 344.00 1001536 5/9/2013 AT&T 4,476.14 1001537 5/9/2013 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 825.16 1001538 5/9/2013 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 93.32 1 1n TRANS.NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1001539 5/9/2013 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC 125.89 Grand Total: 45,620.86 2 11 REPLACEMENT PAGE May 21,2013 AGENDA ITEM: 8B David C. Nolte, ASA Page 12 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER WE ARE HERE TO SERVE YOU! * ISA* 1800 27th Street o Vero Beach,FL 32960 Revised Date: May 20,2013 To: Board of County Commissioners Through: Joseph A. Baird,County Administrator From: David C. Nolte,Property Appraiser I Subject: Request for Authorization to Trade-In Vehicle for Purchase Background: The vehicle described below is being requested to trade in for purchase of a newer vehicle to provide for the needs of the Property Appraiser's Office. The Indian River County Policies& Procedures Capital Assets Section F allows for disposition of an asset through trade-in. Fleet# 629 (W Asset# 21922 Make/Model Chevy Blazer Year: 2004 VIN# 1GNDT13X54K153188 Mileage: 93,452 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners allow for the trade in of$8,000 for both vehicle and rebates in order to offset the purchase price of a new vehicle. Attachments: Indian River County Policies&Procedures Indian River County Disposal of Excess Property Form Copy To: Diane Bernardo, Finance Director Raeanne Cone,Fixed Assets (772)567-8000 F. Fax: (772)770-5087 htta://www.ircpa.om David C. Nolte, ASA • INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER WE ARE HERE TO SERVE YOU! * oxioP* 180027 th Street©Vero Beach, FL 32960 Date: May 14, 2013 To: Board of County Commissioners Through: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator From: David C. Nolte, Property Appraiser Subject: Request for Authorization to Trade-In Vehicle fo Purchase Background: The vehicle described below is being requested to trade ' for purchase of a newer vehicle to provide for the needs of the Property Appraiser's Offi e. The Indian River County Policies& Procedures Capital Assets Section F allows for disp sition of an asset through trade-in. Fleet# 629 Asset# 21922 Make/Model Chevy Blazer Year: 2004 VIN# IGNDT13X54K15318 Mileage: 93,452 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Bo d of County Commissioners allow for the trade in of$5000 for both vehicle and rebates in der to offset the purchase price of a new vehicle. Attachments: Indian River County P licies & Procedures Indian River Co un isposal of Excess Property Form Cony To• Diane Bernar o, Finance Director Raeanne C e, Fixed Assets AD1Dr ed A enda Ite By: osep A Baird, County Administrator y6r: O/ate (772)567-8000 E Fax: (772)770-5087 htti)://www.ircpa.org 19 J INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Meow Cane,Fixed Assets Manogement DATE: 5/9/2013 SUBJECT: Disposal of Excess Property FROM: Debbie Clemenzi Check One: Surplus Transfer Trade-In X Non-Capital Missing/Stolen Asset Number. 21922 Fleet Number. 629 r Asset Description: 2004 Chevy Blazer Serial Number. iGNDT13X54K153188 Do you have possession of the asset? Yes X No If Lost/Missing has a police report been filed? Yes No If Yes, Please attach a copy of the police report. If No,state reason: Is the item functional? Yes X No Description of problems with item: Reason why item is excess: High Maintenance due to age Does OMS need to review the transfer? Yes No (maintenance impact) Department transferred to: Contact Person: Telephone Number. (The above contact information will aid Purchasing and FocHtties Management in the process of equipment removal from departments) If asset will be replaced,please answer the following: Requisition or Purchape Order Number for repiacement: Date Replacement Received ,approval Date Superv( pt Personnel Approval Director/Assistant Director Date Approval Controller Date Approval Oth Date OMB Date Manag C� Approved for: rplus Transfer Trade-inReplacement Disposition Recorded: Fixed Assets Department Date Additional Comments: N k"dkpoftdepad"WWs reqxxw#Ady to k*"iM Mem uM Facgras M0n09*ment can pick N UP, DO NOT REMOVE PROPERTY FROM YOUR LowiON wr Mohr PROPER AuTHOP=ATION FOR DISPOSAL This form to be used for all property With or without on onset number assigned. Please attach o copy of this form securely to the item being disposed of. All other forms for transfer/disposal of property now obsolete. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY POLICIES & PROCEDURES CAPITAL ASSETS The acquisition, disposition, and monitoring of County owned property is governed by Chapter 274 of the Florida Statutes and Rule 69I-73 of the Florida Administrative Code. The County will consider capital assets to be any tangible or intangible property with a value of$1,000 or more and a projected useful life of more than one year. A. DESIGNATION OF CUSTODIAN The Department head will designate a custodian(s) of all capital assets held by that department. The custodian will be responsible for monitoring the locations of all capital assets and facilitating the purchase, disposition and transfer of any assets within their inventory. The custodian will work with the Finance Department during the annual physical inventory to ensure all assets are accounted for and will also be responsible for ensuring all procedures are followed in the acquisition and disposition of capital assets. B. ASSET CAPITALIZATION GUIDELINES These guidelines are being provided to assist management when making the determination between which asset related expenditures are/are not recommended to be capitalized in accordance with governing laws, rules and regulations. The following guidelines, except where noted, apply equally to both Governmental Funds and Proprietary Funds. Definitions are provided as needed. 1. New As —Cost of$1,000.00 or more incurred to acquire an individual asset or to make an asset ready for its intended use should be capitalized. 2. Additions—Purchased additions to previously capitalized assets that meet the capitalization threshold, should be capitalized as add-ons to the existing property record. 3. Replacements/Improvements — The cost to replace or improve an existing asset should be capitalized if it meets the capitalization threshold and at least one of the following criteria: a. Extends the useful life of the existing asset b. Increase the effectiveness or efficiency of an asset For replacements, the old asset should be removed from the fixed asset system if it can be separately identified or if a cost can be estimated for its original value and then adjusted in the fixed asset system. 1d 4. Repairs and Maintenance — Costs that are associated with repairs and maintenance are not recommended for capitalization because they do not add value to the existing asset. However, major repairs that extend the useful life or increase the effectiveness or efficiency of an asset may be classified as improvements and therefore should be capitalized(see#3). Any questions regarding whether purchases should be capitalized should be directed to the Finance Department. C. ACQUISITION OF CAPITAL ASSETS All acquisitions will follow the procedures outlined: 1. After a department determines a need for a capital asset, they will obtain approval to purchase the item from the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) or designee during the annual budget process. In the event a capital asset needs to be purchased and was not approved in the budget, the department will need approval from the BCC or the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)through a budget amendment or line transfer. 2. After approval is obtained, the requesting department will enter a requisition into the system and forward it to the Purchasing Department with the required IL authorizations. The requisition shall contain a detailed description of the item and the cost. The requisition will then be converted to a purchase order. 3. After receiving a capital asset, the requesting department will send the approved invoice and the receiving copy of the purchase order to the Finance Department for payment. If the item is a replacement for an existing capital asset, the Disposal of Excess Property Form must be sent to the Finance Department prior to or at the same time as purchase of the new asset. 4. The Finance Department will place an inventory tag on all capital assets except for County vehicles, computer equipment, or items that are unable to be tagged. County vehicles are tagged by the Fleet Manager and computer equipment is tagged by the Computer Services Manager or his designee. Items that are unable to be tagged will still be assigned a capital asset number. 5. Donated property with a market value in excess of $1,000.00 will be added into the capital assets system. The department must provide written notification to the Finance Department of any donated capital assets. 6. All vehicles purchased will be held solely in the name of Indian River County. If a trade-in is involved please refer to section F of this policy. -� 15 D. DISPOSITION OF CAPITAL ASSETS All dispositions will follow the procedures outlined 1. All dispositions of capital assets must be submitted to the Finance Office on a Disposal of Excess Property Form. The form must be initiated by department personnel and approved by the Department head or designee. If the capital asset is computer equipment, the IT designee from each agency (BCC, Clerk of Court, SOE, Tax Collector & Property Appraiser) must approve the disposal. 2. The Finance office will then provide the Purchasing Department with a copy of the form. The department is responsible for keeping a copy of this form for their records. 3. The Purchasing Department will provide a list of disposed assets in a file named Excess Equipment in the Public folder of Microsoft Outlook (for BCC network users). Departments may view this list to determine if there are any assets they wish to obtain. The custodian is required to verify that all surplus items that have been submitted on disposal forms are listed on the Excess Equipment list. 4. The Purchasing Department will prepare a list to be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for approval to remove the items from the inventory. Once approval has been given, the Finance Department will delete those assets from the capital asset system. 5. The items will be disposed of in accordance with Florida Statutes, Section 274 and Florida Administrative Rule 69I-73. An auction will be held for the assets on the Excess Equipment list that are in working condition. Any funds received from the sale of those assets will be credited back to that department's Fund. 6. Capital assets paid for by a grant should follow granting agency's procedures for disposal. 7. If the capital asset is missing and believed stolen, a police report must be completed and a copy attached to the disposal form. 8. If the capital asset being disposed of is a vehicle, the fuel key issued from Fleet must be returned when the disposition form is approved for the vehicle. All assets approved for disposition will be picked up by Facilities Management. If the item is in workiniz condition, it will be picked up and stored by Facilities Management until sale at auction. After completion of the auction, Purchasing will provide the check with list of items sold and their sale prices to the Finance Department. 1 � Any assets deemed to be in non-working condition by the department head will be taken to the landfill for disposal. Facilities Management will provide documentation from the landfill to the Finance Department showing the disposal of such items. **It is the department's responsibility to keen the assets until Facilities Management can pick them up. Please make sure the fixed asset custodian within each department is aware of the exact location of each item to be disposed. A copy of the disposition form should be securely placed on the item to aid Facilities Management in the retrieval process. E. DISPOSITION THROUGH TRANSFER OF CAPITAL ASSETS All transfers of capital assets between departments must be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget on a Disposal of Excess Property Form for approval by the Budget Director or his designee. Please check the transfer box on the form. Once approval has been given, the Finance Department will transfer the asset as requested. F. DISPOSITION THROUGH TRADE-IN Before any capital asset can be used as a trade-in on a new piece of equipment, it must be approved by the BCC and the Budget Department All trade-ins of capital assets must be submitted to on a Disposal of Excess Property Form. Please check the trade-in box on the form. Once approval has been given from the Budget Department and the BCC, the Finance Department will delete the asset traded in from the capital asset system. G. DISPOSITION OF NON-CAPITAL ASSETS If a department wishes to dispose of a non-capital item that is not in working condition, this disposal must be initiated and approved by the Department Head. It is the responsibility of the department to dispose of the item. If the item requires additional assistance to dispose of, contact Facilities Management. If a department wishes to dispose of a non-capital item that is in working condition, then they must follow the same procedures outlined in Section D regarding sending the items to auction. H. ANNUAL PHYSICAL INVENTORY OF CAPITAL ASSETS A physical inventory of a department's capital assets will be conducted on an annual basis. A representative from the Finance Department will schedule the inventory with each department's designated capital assets custodian. All assets will be physically located and accounted for by the custodian and the Finance Department representative. An Inventory in Progress form will be sent to the department head after completion of the physical inventory that summarizes any additions, deletions, or changes noted during the inventory. The department head review the form, make changes if necessary, and approve by signing and returning it to the Finance Department. 17 PROCEDURES SPECIFIC TO ASSET TYPE: I. MODULAR FURNITURE This section has been added to provide additional guidance as it specifically relates to modular finrniture. 1. Modular furniture that meets the capitalization threshold should be capitalized as equipment/furniture, by lot or by individual unit. 2. If the modular furniture cannot be separately identified from the total cost of the building, it is recommended that the modular furniture be capitalized as part of the building. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact the Finance Department. J. REPLACEMENT OF ASSETS 13_Y_SELF-INSURANCE FUND When a capital asset is severely damaged or destroyed by a covered peril under the County's self-insurance, and the replacement of that asset has been approved through funding from the County's self-insurance fund, the new capital asset must be paid for by the department that owns the asset (that department's budget). Reimbursement must then be requested by the department to Risk Management. Risk Management will then instruct the Finance department to reimburse the department for their cost of replacing the asset. Proper backup is necessary to complete the reimbursement. Also, the asset that was destroyed must be deleted from that department's inventory. K. SAND RENOURISHMENT PROJECTS There are two types of sand renourishment projects that are completed by the County: dune restoration and beach restoration. Dune restorations are smaller scale projects where the sand is placed along the dunes themselves as reinforcement due to erosion. Dune restoration projects average 5-6 cubic yards of sand per foot. Beach restoration projects are large-scale projects that include an immense amount of design and engineering prior to construction. Beach restoration projects average 40-80 cubic yards of sand per foot. A major distinction between beach and dune restoration projects is that dune restoration projects provide reinforcement to the existing dunes while beach restoration projects actually create and expand the existing shoreline. The County will expense all dune restoration projects and capitalize as infrastructure all beach restoration projects. Beach restoration projects will be depreciated over seven years. Beach restoration projects have required monitoring costs that must be completed before and after construction. Preconstruction monitoring costs are typically for 1 year and will be capitalized with the beach restoration project. Post construction monitoring costs are typically for 3 years following the construction completion of the beach restoration project. These monitoring costs are deemed maintenance and therefore will be expensed. 1R L. LIBRARY COLLECTIONS Collections purchased for libraries that are the initial collection to be placed in a library, prior to the opening of a new library or the expansion of an existing library, will be capitalized and depreciated over 5 years. Collections include books, DVDs, CDs, and magazine subscriptions. M. INTANGIBLE ASSETS Intangible assets such as computer software, easements, and land use/water/leachate rights will be capitalized on the County's books and amortized over their useful lives unless that life is indefinite. Computer software is considered an intangible asset if it is developed in-house by County employees or by a third parry contractor on behalf of the government. This includes any commercially available software that is purchased or licensed by the County and that the County must exert minimal incremental effort before the software can be put into operation (per GASB 51). Such purchases will be capitalized if they meet the County's capitalization threshold (Section E). The capitalization threshold will be applied on a per license basis for software purchases. If the per license costs meets the capitalization threshold,the purchase will be capitalized as an intangible asset. When developing or purchasing computer software, there are three stages identified: Preliminary Project Stage, Application Development Stage, and the Post- Implementation/Operation Stage. The stages are defined as follows: 1. Preliminary Project Stage—Evaluation of needs,bid process, and final selection of software 2. Application Development Stage —Software design and installation to hardware, software interfaces and testing, including parallel process 3. Post-Implementation/Operation Stage—Application training and software maintenance The County will only capitalize those activities that are part of the Application Development Stage. All other costs will be expensed as incurred. Yearly renewals and regular upgrades of existing software will be considered an operating cost and expensed as incurred. The County will amortize software over 3-5 years, depending on whether the software is a component of an existing system or a brand new system. Easements and rights granted to or purchased by the County will be assumed to have an indefinite useful life unless there are contractual or legal requirements that state otherwise. In those instances, the County will amortize those easements and rights over the life stated in the contract documents. � Q County Administrator Date \\Adminserv\FIN BUD\FA-CAPITAL ASSETS POLICY.doc 2n 05/08/2013 22:22 FAX 7727700809 LINUS CADILLAC BUICK GM IA 002/002 LINUS CADILLAC BUICK GMC DATE VERO (772)562-1700 1401 U.S. Hwy, 1 � � HOME FAX (772) 770-0809 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 STOCKS OFFICE www.11r)uaautomotive.com Rl PRESENTATIVE CELL DEAL NO. FAX CLIENT MSRP CO CLIENT❑AND/d OR SELLING PRICE ADDRESS CITY ST ZIP EMAIL ADDRESS DRIVER'S LIC. DRIVER'S LIC_ D.O.B.: MODEL YEAR Ey MAKE MODFL EXTERIOR W44.Mg7 INTERIOR PjI Sj/H 1.0.NO, NE PFtE-OWNED 0 DEMO U IN SERVICE DATE: MILF7AGE: LEASE TERM:MONTHS BASE PAYMENT COAL- MILEAGE ALLOWANCE: SALES TAX TDTAL MONTHLY PMT STATE OF FLA TIRE&BATTERY FEE $6 50 DEALER SERVICE FEE-This charge represents coats and profit for herre such se Inspecting,cleaning and adjusting new and USAd valliCla9 and preparing documents rolatad to ma sale. $399 00 f co BASE PRICF INCLUDINS41PTIONS30a 40 TRADE-IN ALLOWANCE op O TAXABLE BALANCR SALES TAX COUNTY DISCRETIONARY TAX TRANSFER eyPj�re,4FT-e 0 00 TOTAL DUEATAPPLICATION FOR TITLE-NEW DUE INCEPTION WARRANTY ENFORCEMENT ACT $Z 00 ALL CASH SETTLEMENTS WILL BE PAYABLE BY CASHIERS CHECK TO LINUS ST.OF FLA NEW-WHEELS FEE ($100,00) CADILLAC BUICK GMC UNLESS PRIOR ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE, Please Note:The appraised value of the vehicle traded is valid only if It Is delivered to the retailer as of this date.Should the traded vehicle be delivered at a Inter date the retailer PAYOFF ON TRADE-IN reserves the right m re-appralse the offered trade at that time.Should the ollent not agree with the re-appraised value than this order may be cancelled provided the right is exercised TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE prior to delivery to the retaller, LESS CASH DEPOSIT CLIENT INITIALS:—_—___ REBATE 00Q 00 DESCRIPTION OF TRADE-IN 01 YEAR MAKE 7,�/�.l MODEL giA STK.No. CASH ON DELIVERY I.D.N0, 1 MILES UNPAID BALANCE TO BE FINANCED Client, by signing this Offer fully understands that If this Is a cash transaction,this offer is not valid unless accepted and signed by Linus Cadillac Buick GMC and If this Is an Installment sale transaction,that this 0-lar Is not accepted and the transaction Is not consummated until(a)approved in writing by Linus Cadillac Buick GNIC,and a responsible Bank or Flitance Company and(b)all disclosures required by the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act(Truth In Lending Act)have peen given and(c)ClIent and Unus Cadillac 13ulck GMC have signed an Installment Sales Contract.Client Hereby acknowledges all terms of this Offer are fully understood. CUENT(S)SIGNATURE ACCEPTED-LINUS CADILLAC BUICK GMC The Rwolds.nd Reynold.C—peny 1738 f 12 Leona Allen g.8. From: Alan Polackwich <apolackwich@ircgov.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:16 PM To: Dori Roy; BCC - Board Members;Joe Baird Cc: Leona Allen; Maureen Gelfo; Scott Johnson Subject: RE: Linus Cadillac Invoice - Property Appraiser Vehicle In reference to this item, at yesterday's meeting the BCC asked me to review the invoice and send an email confirming the county's authority to trade-in the old vehicle, in lieu of a public bid or auction process. Chapter 274, Florida Statutes,deals with the disposition of surplus tangible personal property. While various provisions in chapter 274 speak of the county's discretion, there is clear language in section 274.06 which states that if the estimated value of the property is less than$5000,the county can dispose of it in the "most efficient and cost effective means," as determined by the county ... and if the estimated value is greater than $5000,then a public bid or auction process is required. I have reviewed the invoice, and the trade-in value of the 2004 vehicle is$3000. Thus, in my opinion, we don't have to rely on the "discretion" language in chapter 274 ...the county is authorized to dispose of the vehicle by trade-in pursuant to the clear language in section 274.06. Alan P -----Original Message----- From: Dori Roy Sent:Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:05 AM To: BCC- Board Members;Joe Baird;Alan Polackwich Cc: 'Leona Allen'; 'Maureen Gelfo'; Scott Johnson Subject: Linus Cadillac Invoice- Property Appraiser Vehicle This is the Invoice the Commission Requested to have on file relating to Consent Agenda Item 8B from the meeting on May 21st. Dori Roy Assistant to the County Administrator Phone: 772-226-1408 Indian River County 180127th Street Vero Beach, FI 32960-3388 • Before printing this e-mail,think if it is necessary.Think Green! Under Florida law,e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public-records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. 1 ao A a- PROCLAMATION � 6 HONORING THOMAS WOLSTENHOLME ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SER VICESIPARES DIVISION WHEREAS, Thomas Wolstenholme is retiring from Indian River County effective May 30, i 2013; and ' fi WHEREAS, Thomas Wolstenholme began his employment with Indian River County on January 13, 1995 as a Maintenance Worker I at Sandridge Golf Course. He was promoted to Maintenance Worker H in January 1996 and again in June 1996 to Maintenance Worker V in t Road & Bridge.. In December 1998 he was promoted to Utilities Service Worker in Utility ' l Services. In November 2005 he transferred.ferred to Maintenance Worker in Parks and subsequently advanced to Senior Maintenance Worker, which is the position he currently holds today; and k i WHEREAS, Thomas Wolstenholme has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. He has been instrumental in the maintenance of North County Regional Park and is a dedicated employee His work is greatly appreciated by his employer and co- i f.. workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds , Thomas Wolstenholme's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express !! their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last 4 eighteen years; and � l � i BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend f heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors! } t Adopted this 21st day of May 2013. j f � I C� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS l INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman , u This is to certify that I q-homas WoCstenhofine is here6ypresentedtfiis ! 1 §tirement.ward f E � '1 1 for outstanding perfoance and j Cse 'rv�ce to faith� IIr � � f t j Indian Wiver County ; e Board'of County Commissioners I r I n r Tor eighteen years of service i 1 t On this 30th day of 9W ay 2013 9 chael Zito Joseph E. Tlescher Assistant CountyAdministrator Board of County Commissioner, Chairman I PRO CLAMA TION 3 HONORING SHIRLEY WOLSTENHOLME ON HER RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTYBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES/LIBRARY DIVISION WHEREAS, Shirley Wolstenholme is retiring from Indian River County effective May 30, 2013; and WHEREAS, Shirley Wolstenholme started as a Youth Coordinator for the Sebastian River Library Association on November 18, 1985; and WHEREAS, Shirley Wolstenholme began her employment with the County as a Librarian H at the North Indian River County Library on October 1, 1986. As a result of her passion and devotion to her job, the North Indian River County Library has gone far in achieving its goal of being a "Children's Door to Learning." During her twenty-six years of service, she has planned and implemented 10,711 Children's Programs attended by 327,156 children. Through her efforts, Shirley Wolstenholme has encouraged the development of a culture where literature and learning are valued in the community. She is a dedicated employee and her work has been greatly appreciated by her employer, co-workers and patrons alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 1 COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds r Shirley Wolstenholme's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service she has given to Indian River County for the last twenty- six years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in her future endeavors! Adopted this 21st day of May 2013. r �V (� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA IL , Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman r 4RIU� ('� �'� '� �---,�• -� �------ "tom�-- �,g�,,-�"�-�'�p-� i � 1 ; This is to certify that - z E o;hrrley Wolstenholme f is here6y presented•this Y fWwirementftard y t \ I I for outstanding performance and � S faithjWservice to 1 j Indian ever County u Board of County Commissioners a f for twenty-semyears of service J i on this 30th day of 91la 2013 { , I I Michae[Zito Joseph E. Flescher ! f Assistant County-Administrator Boardof County Commissioner, Chairman J CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: May 14, 2013 SUBJECT: 2012/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE FROM: Jason E. Brown Director, Management& kdget DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS The Indian River County Health Department has submitted the proposed 2012/2013 Fee Schedule for approval-by the Board of Commissioners. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 154.06 (1), the Board of Commissioners must establish the fee schedule by resolution. The fee schedule is to become effective on May 21, 2013, when approved by the Board of Commissioners. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the 2012/2013 Fee Schedule and adopt the Resolution, to become effective on May 21, 2013. ATTACHMENTS May 3, 2013 Letter from Miranda Hawker, County Health Department Administrator Resolution with 2012/2013 Fee Schedule APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River County ved Date Administrator 516 / BY: 70 Legal S- , --1; Jos ph A. Baird Budget I County Administrator Department FOR: May 21, 2013 Risk Manaement 7� - - w Mission: Rick Scott To protect,promote&improve the health ft Governor of all people in Florida through integrated state,county&community efforts. John H.Armstrong, MD, FACS HEALTH State Surgeon General&Secretary Vision:To be the Healthiest State in the Nation INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT May 3, 2013 Mr. Joseph A. Baird Administrator Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 RE: 2012-2013 FEE SCHEDULE Dear Mr. Baird, Please find attached the proposed fee scheduled for FY 2012-2013 Indian River County Health Department for your review and formal approval by the Indian River County Board of Commissioners. Under F.S. 154.06, "Each county may establish, and each county health department may collect, fees for primary care services, provided that a schedule of such fees is established by resolution of the board of county commissioners or by rule of the department, respectively. We have provided an updated itemized sliding fee schedule for all health department services. As we sign up with Medicaid HMOs, we need to add the following language to our fee schedule as HMOs will reimburse the lower of our fees or the Medicaid fees: "Fees shall be no less than Medicaid Fee-for-Service reimbursement rate and no greater than the Medicare reimbursement rate plus fifty percent, in effect at the time of service, or comparable reimbursement rates, if no such rates are available." This will give us the flexibility to be able to bill at the higher reimbursement rate and not lose revenue at the lower rate. Please feel free to call me at 794-7450 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Miranda C. Hawker, M.P.H. County Health Department Administrator Attachments cc: Beth Benton, Office of Management and Budget R E G r IV, r-P Florida Department of Health www.FloridasHealth.com Indian River County Health Department , �~ WRAalthyFLA 1900 27"Street,Vero Beach,FL 32960 # ,; FA OK:F'D6parhV0ftofHealth ^ PHONE:772-794-7400/www.myirchd.com YOUTUBE:fldoh b RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ADOPT A 2012/2013 FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, the Indian River County Health Department has proposed a new fee schedule to become effective May 21, 2013, as set forth more fully in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, section 154.06(1), Florida Statutes, provides that the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners must establish the fee schedule by resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Effective May 21, 2013, all fees set forth on Exhibit "A" are established for use by the Indian River County Health Department. Such fees shall remain in effect until further resolution of this Board. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner and the motion was seconded by Commissioner and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of 2013. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Clerk of Court and Comptroller By By Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Deputy Clerk Attachment: Exhibit "A" APPROVED AS TO FORM AND /LEG FF IENCY BY V' `-COUNTY ATTORNEY 97 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCH' E Fees shall be no less than the Medicaid Fee-for-Service reimbursement and no greater than the Medicare reimbursement rate plus fifty percent, in effect at the time of service,or comparable reimbursement rates if no such rates are availble. 10 .:G"' CY 12-13 Fee Medical Visit-New Patient _ 99201 Level One $0.00 $6.97 $13.53 $20.50 $27.47 $34.03 $41.00 $41.00 99202 Level Two $0.00 $7.31 $14.19 $21.50 $28.81 $35.69 $43.00 $43.00 99203 Level Three $0.00 $10.88 $21.12 $32.00 $42.88 $53.12 $64.00 $64.00 99204 Level Four $0.00 $15.30 $29.70 $45.00 $60.30 $74.70 $90.00 $90.00 99201 TD Nurse Protocol $0.00 $6.97 $13.53 $20.50 $27.47 $34.03 $41.00 $41.00 Medical Visit-Established Patient 99211 Level One $0.00 $2.89 $5.61 $8.50 $11.39 $14.11 $17.00 $17.00 99212 Level Two $0.00 $4.93 $9.57 $14.50 $19.43 $24.07 $29.00 $29.00 99213 Level Three $0.00 $5.95 $11.55 $17.50 $23.45 $29.05 $35.00 $35.00 99214 Level Four $0.00 $9.18 $17.82 $27.00 $36.18 $44.82 $54.00 $54.00 99211 TD Nurse Protocol $0.00 $2.89 $5.61 $8.50 $11.39 $14.11 $17.00 $17.00 All Lab fees will be charged in addition to office visits on a sliding fee scale. School 1 Sports/Work Physical ; ;,. , ,(NOSLIDII�aFE,Gr .�t Wit"' a�, 06 " $25.00 $25.00 Physical(CHCU)* $0.00 $15.30 $29.70 $45.00 $60.30 $74.70 $90.00 $90.00 *Medicaid"Child Health Check-Up"and routine physical includes applicable in-house laboratory services. Must be established primary care patient to receive physical on sliding fee scale. Other Services Smoking Cessation Intermediate 3-10 minutes $Q.00 $2.19 $4.25 $6.45 $8.64 $10.70 $12.89 $12.89 Smoking Cessation Intensive>10 minutes $0.00 $4.32 $8.38 $12.70 $17.01 $21.07 $25.39 $25.39 99499-Flouride Varnish-521.01 $0.00 $4.25 $8.25 $12.50 $16.75 $20.75 $25.00 $25.00 HIV Pre-Test Counseling $0.00 $4.25 $8,25 $12.50 $16.75 $20.75 $25.00 $25.00 HIV Post-Test Counseling+ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 +included in pre-test counseling ,4f#"dditional rlint6-fees-1 FnediGat-pFeGedWes will-fie GhaF ed at Meth_'.'Fates plus 260/; Out of County Patient Fees* Patients will be assessed at 100%of Sliding Fee Scale EXHIBIT "A" iV Page 1 of 9 00 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCHF IE y 12-13 RTR'T�0'A1101, C Fee rvrr a oo ° �° ° 0"A.3:.�. 6. 4 . l? r�Qi�" 4,. 95a° r a. . . 3 I� 8 -St !iw - ,8,..., ..., .,,. Medical Visit-New Patient 99201 Level One $0.00 $6.97 $13.53 $20.50 $27.47 $34.03 $36.90 $38.95 $41.00 $41.00 99202 Level Two $1.00 $7.31 $14.19 $21.50 $28.81 $35.69 $38.70 $40.85 $43.00 $43.00 99203 Level Three $2.00 $10.88 $21.12 $32.00 $42.88 $53.12 $57.60 $60.80 $64.00 $64.00 99204 Level Four $3.00 $15.30 $29.70 $45.00 $60.30 $74.70 $81.00 $85.50 $90.00 $90.00 99201 TD Nurse Protocol $4.00 $4.25 $8.25 $12.50 $16.75 $20.75 $22.50 $23.75 $25.00 $25.00 Medical Visit-Established Patient 99211 Level One $0.00 $2.89 $5.61 $8.50 $11.39 $14.11 $15.30 $16.15 $17.00 $17.00 99212 Level Two $0.00 $4.93 $9.57 $14.50 $19.43 $24.07 $26.10 $27.55 $29.00 $29.00 99213 Level Three $0.00 $5.95 $11.55 $17.50 $23.45 $29.05 $31.50 $33.25 $35.00 $35.00 99214 Level Four $0.00 $9.18 $17.82 $27.00 $36.18 $44.82 $48.60 $51.30 $54.00 $54.00 99211 TD Nurse Protocol $0.00 $2.89 $5.61 $8.50 $11.39 $14.11 $15.30 $16.15 $17.00 $17.00 Family Planning Initial/AnnualmlFamily Planning Visit $15.30 $29.70 $45.00 $60.30 $74.70 $81.00 $85.50 $90.00 $90.00 Subsequent Family Planning Visit(s) $0.00 $6.29 $12.211 $18.50 $24.79 $30.71 $33.30 $35.15 $37.00 $37.00 *Includes all applicable in-house laboratory services.All contracted Labs will be charged as per sliding fee scale($35.00). All Lab fees will be charged in addition to office visits on a sliding fee scale. Insurance will not be billed for Lab services. -An"dditie recederes will he shairged at M ° Procedures not included in office visit 58301 IUD Removal $0.00 $10.20 $19.80 $30.00 $40.20 $49.80 $54.00 $57.0 $60.00 $60.0 Page 2 of 9 SO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCH t r 3qt, d u 4w ..:Nur e - s t. Wee 4 � � .� w t t,' ^ * 7 t.., .u1..� , �?rt:,, % F 63 z Fr 40/0 G'58301 IUD Removal $0.00 $10.20 $19.80 $30.0011765 Ingrown Toenail Treatment $0.00 $8.50 $16.50 $25.00 $39.50 $41.20 1.50.80 $50.00$50.0017000 Wart Treatment-First $0.00 $5.95 $11.55 $17.50 $23.45 $29.05 $35.17003 Wart Treatment-Each additional wart $0.00 $1.02 $1.98 $3.00 $402 $10060 Incision and Drainage $0.00 $9.35 $18.15 $27.50 $36.85 $45.65 $55.0094640 Respiratory Treatment* $0.00 $1.70 $3.30 $5.00 $6.70 8.30 $10.0093000 EKG $0.00 $5.10 $9.90 $15.00 $2010 $24.90 $30.00 *There is an additional charge for medication CY 12-13 Fee 71020 Chest X-Ra $0.00 $9.35 $18.15 $27.50 $36.85 $45.65[ 5.001 $55.0 N/A Tubal Ligation Under contract with Indian River Medical Center -90 YAWAW Vasectomy 4 - a *616 Nutritional Counseling-per hour $0.00 $5.95] $11.551 $17.501 $23.451 $29.051 $35.00 $35.0 TB Quantiferon-GOLD Test $40.00 TST Evaluation* (Prepayment) O SL DI F� s' , t. $5.00 $5.0 TST placement* �.O SL h!�._. { .i, ;, 14,. 1 $15.00 $15.0 *Unless included in Physical or Office Visit. If it is part of an EPI investigation,there will be no charge and should be indicated as such on the Client encounter form. Insurance will be billed if insurance information is available. -Any additienal slin+^rfees 1 mediGal PFGGedWes will be GhaFged at Medioald rates plus 26a a �A) Page 3 of 9 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCHfo"E 1 u s,,� ,x. -' t •. 4%d 60113 ?r '33°u�keC �50°/da D TFnm:q-�_ ; F, *00%`100' �X�12�13,Influenza $0.00 $3.23 $6.27 $9.50 .77 $19.00 19.00Pneumococcal Pneumonia $0.00 $11.053250 .95 $65.00 65.00Measles/Mumps/Rubell a $0.00 $11.05 $21.44 $32.493.93 $64.98 64.98Tetanus $0.00 $6.64 $12.89 $19.532.41 $39.05 39.05Tdap $0.00 $8.84 $17.16 $26.01 . 3.17 $52.01 52.01 Injected Polio Vaccine $0.00 $7.51 $14.57 $22.08 $29.58 $36.64 $44.15 44.15 Varivax(Chicken Pox) $0.00 $20.64 $40.07 $60.71 $81.35 :6100.78 $121.42 121.4'2 Meningococcal $0.00 $20.92 $40.60 $61.52 $82.44 $102.12 $123.04 123.04 Rabies Vaccine(per injection) $0.00 $30.60 $59.40 $90.00 $120.60 $149.40 $180.00 180.00 RIG - Per2cc Vial $0.00 $37.40 $72.60 $110.00 $147.40 $182.60 $220.00 220.00 Hepatitis A Vaccine(per injection) $0.00 $7.22 $14.01 $21.23 $28.45 $35.24 $42.46 $42.46 Hepatitis B Vaccine(per injection) $0.00 $8.43 $16.35 $24.78 $33.21 $41.13 $49.56 $49.56 Twinrix-Hep A ci B(per injection $0 00 $11.24 $21 81 $33 05 $44 29 $54.86 $66.10 $66.10 � � r 170.32 170.32 Shin les Vaccine r; +� )�� ma; N $LI IN,,. EE � '....�40 � $ Cervical Cancer Vaccine $0.00111 $24.23 $47..03 $71.27 $95.50 $118.30 $142.53 142.53 Per CDC guidelines,vaccine for childhood immunizations are covered under the Vaccine for Children Program and are rovided at no cost to children age 0-18. Charges for communicable disease control issues will be waived with authorization. CY 12-13 Travel Immunization Consult Visit $35.00 Administration Fee-90471 $5.00 Administration Fee,additional shot-90472 $5.00 Hepatitis B Vaccine $49.56 "All vaccines will be chargeable at cost Hepatitis B Vaccine-Children $40.86 plus$20.00 on the last received invoice Hep B Immune Globulin*per ml $130.00 by Indian River County Health Department Hepatitis A Vaccine $42.46 Hepatitis A Vaccine-Children $48.09 Hep A Immune Globulin* $60.00 Per 2 ml dose Twinrix(Hep A&B) $66.10 Meningococcal 1 Tetanus $339.0 04 2.0 Tdap* $ Typhoid $699.7.7 5 $101.05 Yellow Fever *As available Page 4 of 9 w .1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCHF X11 t3bir§I IN.S I ICBs a� 1,�n ' r i u' � 0°/a 'A •° 7i�° oB'�� 33°� �C, #�t�50°/gCfi PRd"" 671%a Eta " 83%0 M. J %Q:�G• CY 12-13 IN-HOUSE LAB LAB $0.00 $4.25 $8.25 $12.50 $16.75 $20.751 $25.001 $25.0 �orltaatedl�pbr�tgry€senrce�trer�Rey LAB $0.00 $5.95 $11.55 $17-501 45 $29.05 $35.00 $35.0 NOTE: Tests which exceed a charge of$100.00 will be billed individually on a sliding fee scale percentage based on IRCHD cost of lab service IN-HOUSE and CONTRACTED LAB Fee is for all labs performed at the time of service. All Lab fees will be char ed in addition to office visits on a slidin fee scale as above. General Health Consultation-private facilities and agencies $55.0 Smoking Cessation-group setting $25.0per client Notary Public Fee $15.0 Return Check Service Charge $15.00 or 5%of the face amount of the check,draft or order,whichever is greater not to exceed$150.00. S.215.34(2), F.S.) (DOHP 56-66-08-AR Policy) Special reports(Physician's narrative,insurance forms,or review of medical records by physician $25.0 Cop of Medical Record/ er age$0.15 per a e and an additional$.05 for double sided copies plus cost of postage if mauled. Lar a scale co ing re uets regwrin extensive clerical assistance will be sub`ect to an$10.00 administration fee in addition to the above stated fee er FL Statute 119.07. - NOTE: Florida Statutes regardin release of medical records must be met rior to release of medical records to any source. No fees are charged to physician offices/other medical a ents with the understanding that IRCHD will also be exempt from such payment. �P„>3irtna4e�.'.tl� 5e"cr ces;• .,�_ .i`: ��',. The charges to clients for all items purchased by and under the purview of the Health Department shall be predicated upon the basis of actual costs plus$10.00 fee for each item purchased on a slid in fee basis. Insulin and E ilepsy medications can be provided at no charge if residents meet financial screening eligibility criteria. �unl�I°��t�a�sttcO�! g... : � °? CY 12-13 Birth Certificates(computer) $12.00 Birth Certificates(book) $15.00 Additional Copies(computer) $10.00 Additional Copies(book) $10.00 Death Certificates $12.00 Plastic Sleeve $5.00 Research Fee(per ear) $3.00 Expedite Fee $5.00 Overnight Shipment $15.00 Birth Certificates are provided free of charge to the following only: Children&Families Case Workers who are involved in a custodycase. Case Worker must present pro, er ID,completed application re uest and co y of the signed court etition. only one certified copy will be provided per six(6)month period. Page 5 of 9 V INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCHF E Environmental Health County Fees CY 12-13 CY 12-13 Well Permit(Potable) $75.00 Grease Trap Construction Permit(Sewer) $75.0 Well Permit(Irrigation) $50.00 Grease TrapAnnual Operating Permit $50.0 Well Permit ir Sites or more $100.00 Quarter) Sample Collection Fee and Analysis $250.0 $25.00 Haz Waste Assessment/Inspection Small Quantity Generators $50.0 Well Abandonment Well Permit Construction Variance $100.00 OSTDS Permits After Construction Begins Well Fee Public Supply Well Permit $250.00 Child Care Inspection Fee $100.0 Demolition Permits: Annual Residential Facility Inspection Fee $50.0 Single Family Residence $75.00 Sanitation Certification Inspection upon Re uest $50.0 Commercial Structures including mulit-famil $100.00 Administrative Site Plan-OSTDS $50.0 Commercial Structures>3,000 square feet $150.00 Administrative Site Plan-Sewer $2LU Demolition Reins ection $50.00 Site Plan Review-OSTD $7 Environmental Assessment $150.0 Site Plan Review-Sewer $2 Indoor Air QualityAssessment $50.00/h Revised Site Plan -OSTDS $5 Plan Review Regulated Facilities $75.00 Revised Site Plan-Sewe $2 Laboratory Fees Ran a$5.00-$25.00 Subdiv Plan Review OSTDS 0-100=$100$1 for ea over 100: $100 an Bacteriological Drinking Water Test $25.00 Subdivision Plan Review Sewer $25.0 Sample Collection Fee $50.00 Research/Report Fee Per Request $10.0 Sharps Containers: Delinquent Permit Fee For Programs Without Fee in Place $25.0 1 Gal Size $3.00 Non Compliance Inspections $50.0 2 Gal Size $4.00 Scheduled OSTDS Inspection Per Contractor Re uest $150.0 Double Fees for operating without a permit for all programs NOTE:Clients shall not be denied Sharps Containers for failure or inability to pay. Residents shall not be charged a fee as part of the Solid Waste Sharps Disposal Program Environmental Health State Fees Please see Attachment Page 6 of 9 i� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCHE` F Dental Services(Sliding Fee Scale does notapply) CY 12-13 CY 12-13 D0120 Periodic Oral Exam(Medicaid Return) 20.00 D5110 Complete Denture-Max 450.00- D0140 Limited Oral Exam(EMER) 17.00 D5120 Complete Denture-Mand 450.00 D0150 Comprehensive Exam Medicaid 25.00 D5211 Upper Partial-Resin Base 400.00 D0210 Intra Oral Complete Sen(inc BW) 50.00 D5212 Lower Partial-Resin Base $400.0 D0220 PA Single-First 10.00 D5213 Maxillary Partial Denture Cast Metal) $550.0 D0230 PA-Each Additional 7.00 D5214 Mandibular Partial Denture Cast Metal) $550.0 D0270 Bitewings-Single L or R 10.00 D5410 Adjust Complete Denture-Max $20.0 D0272 Bitewings-Two 18.00 D5411 Adjust Complete Denture-Mand $20.0 D0274 Bitewings-Four 25.00 D5421 Adjust Partial Denture-Max $20.0 D0330 Panoramic Film 45.00 D5422 Adjust Partial Denture-Mand $20.0 D0470 Diagnostic Cast 20.00 D5510 Repair Complete Denture-Base+LAB $50+lab D1110 Prophylaxis-Adult 14+ 40.00 D5520 Replace Teeth Complete Denture+LAB $50+lab D1120 Prophylaxis-Child<14 30.00 D5640 Replace Teeth-Partial Denture+IAB $50+lab D1203 Topical Fluoride-Child<14 14.00 D5650 Add Tooth to Existing Denture+LAB $50+lab D1204 Topical Fluoride-Adult 14+ 15.00 D5660 Add Clasp to Partial'Denture+IAB $50+lab D1206 Fluoride Varnish 15.00 D5730 Reline Complete Max-Chairside _ $90.0 D1330 Oral Hygiene Instruction 10.00 D5731 Reline Complete Mand-Chairside $90.0 D1351 Sealant-Per Tooth 3, 14, 19, 30 20.00 D5750 Reline Complete Max+LAB $50+lab D1510 Space Main-Fixed-Unilat includes lab fee) 150.00 D5751 Reline Complete Mand+LAB $50+lab D1515 Space Main-Fixed-Bilat includes lab fee 175.00 D5820 Interim Partial Denture(Upper Flipper) $100+lab D1550 Recement Space Maint 20.00 D5821 Interim Partial Denture Lower Flipper) $100+lab D2140 AM 1 Surf- 45.00 D7111 N Coron Remnants-Deciduous $40.0 D2150 AM 2 Surf- 55.00 D7140 Ext. Erupted Tooth or $40.0 D2160 AM 3 Surf- 65.00 D7160 Sched Surg Post Op $40.0 D2161 AM 4 Surf- 75.00 D7210 Surgical Erupted 1 $70.0 D2330 Comp Resin-One Surface-Ant 45.00 D7220 Surg Ext-Soft Tissue Impact $75.0 D2331 Comp Two Surface Ant 55.00 D7230 Surg Ext-Part. Bony Impact $80.0 D2332 Comp Three Surface Ant 65.00 D7240 Surg Ext-Part. Bony Impact $100.0 D2335 Corn Incisal Angle+4 Surf 70.00 D7250 Root Recovery-Surgery $90.0 D2391 Comp Resin 1 Surf Post 55.00 D7280 Sugg Exposure to Aid Eruption $75.0 D2392 Comp Resin 2 Surf Post 65.00 D7285 Biopsy-Hard Tissue+LAB $100+lab D2393 Comp Resin 3 Surf Post 75.00 D7286 Biopsy-Soft Tissue+LAB $85+lab D2394 Comp Resin 4>Surf Post 85.00 D7288 Brush Biopsy+LAB $40+lab D2920 Recement Crown 20.00 D7310 Aiveolo tasty w/Extraction $50.0 D2930 Stainless Steel-Primary 75.00 D7320 Alveoloplasty No Extraction $75.00- D2931 Stainless Steel Crown-Perm 100.00 D7510 I&D-Intraoral(Drainage Abcess) $50.0 D2940 Sedative Filling 27.00 D9110 Palliative Services $20.0 D2951 Pin Retention-Per Tooth 7.00 D9230 Analgesia Nitrous $35.0 D2970 Temporary Crown 70.00 D9310 Consultation $20.0 D3110 Pulp Cap-Direct 20.00 D9630 Drugs $25.0 D3120 Pulp Cap-Indirect 20.00 D9930 Treatment Complication(Post Surgery) $40.0 D3220 Vital Pulpotomy 60.00 D9940 Occlusal Guard $100+lab D4341 Periodontal Scaling/Root Plannin Quad# 50.00 D9951 Occlusal Adjustment-Limited $50.0 D4342 Periodontal 1-3 Teeth 50.00 D9972 External Bleaching Up er&Lower Arch $100.0 D4355 Full Mouth Debridement 65.00 Any other service provided not listed will be at Medicaid rate plus$15.00 United Way Succes By Six will be charged at 50%of the Dental Fees Page 7 of 9 -4� i INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCHp E Florida Administrative Code,Chapter 1013-121 For the purpose of family planning,sexually transmitted disease,or HIV/AIDS services only,minors seeking those services shall be considered a separate family for income eligibility determination purposes and shall be assessed fees for those services based upon their own personal gross income. Any client who elects to waive the eligibility determination process shall be assigned to the full fee category. If there is no fee for a service, income eligibility does not need to be determined,except for WIC. The self-declaration statement shall include a signed acknowledgment that the statement is true at the time it is made,and that the person making the statement understands that the provider shall attempt to verify the statement. Verification can be secured by telephone, in written form,or by face-to-face contact,verification does not require a written document to confirm an applicant's or client's statement. If the provider is unable to verify wages paid or an employer will not verify wages paid,the self-declaratory statement provided b the applicant must be accepted as accurate. Clients served by CHD's and their subcontractors shall not be denied services for tuberculosis, sexually transmitted disease,or HIV/AIDS communicable disease control because of failure or inability to pay a prescribed fee, regardless of their income. Clients interviewed,examined,or tested at IRCHD's initiative because they are a contact to a case of communicable disease or because they are a member of a group at risk that is being investigated by the IRCHD shall not be charged a fee for the interview,examination,or testing;these clients may be charged on a sliding fee scale for any treatment indicated, but they cannot be denied services based on inability to pay. Clients served by IRCHD and their subcontractors shall not be denied family planning services for failure or inability to pay a prescribed fee, regardless of their income;however,the family planning services of inserting Norplant, and male and female sterilization,shall be limited depending on the availability of funds to pay for these services. Clients shall not be denied pregnancy testing for failure or inability to pay. Clients may request a review of their fee charge on the basis that they have severe, unusual, and unavoidable expenses or obligations that substantially reduce their ability to pay and which warrantspecial consideration. w Page 8 of 9 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEE SCH`1 IRCHD POLICIES _School Year Polic Regarding Physicals: If a patient is already established at IRCHD as a primary care patient,physicals will be given based on sliding fee scale; however,if they are new to the clinic for medical care,they must pay the advance fee of$25.9 unless they register as a prima care patient and transfer all current medical records to the health department. County of Residence: (Prima Care) If a patient has Medicaid,other confirmed medical coverage,or prepays out of county charge,we will see them in the clinic and bill for service. However,all sliding fee or zero pay patients must be seen at the health department in the county of their residence.Failure to show confirmation of county residence will result in payment of 100%until such confirmation is obtained. (Exception to this rule will be for treatment of communicable diseases and f mfly planningservices.) 4ns-w-anGe-wi4-nat-be-We Employee medical care will be provided based on approved policy and procedure. Hepatitis A&B vaccines are provided free of charge to ages 0-18 per CDC Vaccine for Children guidelines. If a patient has Medicaid coverage,Medicaid will cover Hep A&B to age 21. Vaccines will not be provided on a sliding fee scale for non-established patients over the age of 18. EXCEPTION: Vaccine will beprovided free of charge or on reduced fee if vaccine is treatment for communicable disease. -Anonymews HIV Test;Rg; $25.00 fee applies to all W test. HeweveF,test will be Reduced 9-vAl-be aGGepted-fGir hardship cases. 4 afirewith PaFtnprs in Women's Health,a Feduned fee of$IQ-aQ%vil'he billed to th-ca Wha. F8 pregnant and FPferreGI �e-4fiSF�9_fe unr.-,���etip9 Access to dental services will be limited to those patients who make less than.300%of the current Federal Poverty Level: Access to eye clinic services will be limited to those patients who make less than 200%of the current Federal Poverty Level. Page 9 of 9 CONSENT AGENDA ® INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Q F MEMORANDUM U TO: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator D.WaITMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: op-1/-1 Z, .01 o ert M. Keati g, AI ; Comm Development Director THROUGH: Phil Matson, AICP; MPO Staff Director ap) FROM: Brian Freeman, AICP; Senior Transportation Planner DATE: May 10, 2013 SUBJECT: Request for Approval to Enter into a Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement(SJPA)with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for Service to the Indian River State College Main Campus (Fort Pierce) It is requested that the information herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2013. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS For the past several years,the county has applied for and received transit operating assistance under the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)Corridor Grant program.These grant funds have been passed through to the Senior Resource Association(SRA),Indian River County's transit service provider. FDOT Corridor Grant funds may be used for improving transit operations,such as realigning routes or increasing coverage areas. In 2009,the county was approved for a Corridor Grant to establish a new transit route between Indian River County and the Indian River State College (IRSC) Main Campus in St. Lucie County. Besides serving IRSC, the new transit route established with the corridor grant funds also serves the SR 60 corridor between the Indian River Mall and the Vero Fashion Outlets. Through this grant,intercounty transit service to St.Lucie County is 100%funded by FDOT with no local contribution. At this time, FDOT is allocating an additional $31,086 to the county. With this amount,a total of$629,798 has been allocated to the county through this grant.In addition,FDOT is FACommunity Development\Users\MPO\Transit\Grants\Corridor\Graduate\SJPA#4\bcc staff report.doc 1 .17 extending the grant until June 3 0,2014,an addition of three months that will allow the grant to cover the entire 2013/14 school year. Although the Joint Participation Agreement(JPA)was approved in 2009,the county now must enter into a Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement(SJPA)with FDOT in order to receive the funds for FY 2012/13 (see Attachment#2). ANALYSIS The attached resolution(Attachment#1) authorizes the Chairman to execute the SJPA for Transit Corridor Grant funds.Upon the Board's adoption of the resolution and the Chairman's execution of the SJPA,MPO staff will transmit the SJPA to FDOT. As with the FTA Section 5307 grant program,only public agencies may be designated recipients of state Transit Corridor Grant funds. With respect to the Transit Corridor Grant program,the county receives the grant fiends and transfers those funds to the county's Community Transportation Coordinator and transit provider, the Senior Resource Association (SRA). The SRA, in turn, provides the service as directed by the county and as identified in the JPA.In this case,the fluids are to be used to provide intercounty service to the IRSC Main Campus in St. Lucie County. Intercounty transit service to St. Lucie County began in early 2010 with the introduction of a new transit route(GoLine Route 13)that originates at the Indian River Mall and provides service to the IRSC Main Campus in Fort Pierce.The route also serves the SR 60 corridor from the Indian River Mall to the Vero Fashion Outlets. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement and adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Chairman to sign the agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Authorizing Resolution for the Execution of a Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement 2. FDOT Public Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement 3. Grant Budget Form Indian River Co, Approved Date APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Admin. Legal 57 FOR: 1 ,20 13 Budget BY: Dept. Risk Mer. FXommunity Develop ent\Users\MPO\Transit\Grants\Corridor\Graduate\SJPA#4\bcc staff report.doc 2 �R RESOLUTION NO. 2013 - A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEREAS, Indian River County has applied for and been allocated state mass transit operating assistance under FDOT Procedure number 725-030-003-e, also known as the Corridor Grant Program; and WHEREAS, Indian River County, as the designated recipient of federal and state public transportation funding,must be the recipient of those funds on behalf of the Indian River County— Senior Resource Association; and WHEREAS, Indian River County is eligible to receive grant funding under Section 341.052(1), Florida Statutes, and under 49 USC Ch. 53, Section 5307 and 49 USC 1614; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation provides Corridor Grant funds to Indian River County to assist in the continuance and expansion of local public transportation services. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: 1. That the Chairman of the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners is authorized to execute a public transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation to obtain$31,086 in FY 2012/13 state Corridor Grant Rinds for operating assistance as part of the County's ongoing public transportation service. 2. That the Indian River County Community Development Director is authorized to furnish such additional information as the Florida Department of Transportation may require in connection with the County's Corridor Grant. THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by ,and the motion was seconded by , and,upon being put to a vote,the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice-Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Tim Zorc F:\Community Development\Users\MPO\Transit\Grants\Corridor\Graduate\SJPA#4\bcc resolution.doc Page 1 of 2 Attanhment 1 `'� RESOLUTION NO. 2013 - The Chairperson thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 21st day of May 52013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day,before me, an officer duly authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments,personally appeared Joseph E. Flescher,as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners,and ,as Deputy Clerk,to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 21st day of Maw_, 2013. Notary Public APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY SEAL: .BY: Y'94e, �ow Alan Polackwich, Sr. County Attorney APPROVED AS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MATTERS BY: Obert M. Keating, A P, Dire Community Development Dep ment FACommunity Development\Users\MPO\Transit\Grants\Corridor\Graduate\SJPA#4\bcc resolution.doc Page 2 of 2 40 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 725030-07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 6/11 SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT Page 1 of Number 04 r"inancial Project No.: Fund: DPTO FLAIR Approp.: 088774 425138-1-84-01 Function: 680 FLAIR Obj.: 750013 (item-segment-phase-sequence) Federal No.: N/A Org.Code: 55042010429 Contract No.: AP049 DUNS No.: 80-939-7102 Vendor No.: VF596000674029 CFDA Number: N/A CSFA Number: 55.013 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an agency of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the Department, and Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32967 hereinafter referred to as Agency. WITNESSETH : WHEREAS, the Department and the Agency heretofore on the 2 nd day of October 2009 entered into a Joint Participation Agreement; and r'HEREAS,the Agency desires to accomplish certain project items as outlined in the Attachment"A"appended hereto; and WHEREAS,the Department desires to participate in all eligible items for this project as outlined in Attachment "A"for a total Department Share of $ 629,798.00 NOW,THEREFORE THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH: that for and in consideration of the mutual benefits to flow from each to the other,the parties hereto agree that the above described Joint Participation Agreement is to be amended and supplemented as follows: 1.00 Project Description:The project description is amended Indian River County will continue to provide regional transit service from Indian River mall(SR60, Vero Beach)to Indian River State College in Fort Pierce(St. Lucie County).To provide this service, a new route(Route13)has been established. Route 13 operates continuously on weekdays from 6:50AM to 5:OOPM. Attachment 2 41 nfi-030.07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 6/11 Page 2 of 3 2.00 Project Cost: Paragraph 3.00 of said Agreement is • increased O decreased by$ 31,086.00 bringing the revised total cost of the project to$ 629,798.00 Paragraph 4.00 of said Agreement is • increased O decreased by$ 31,086.00 bringing the Department's revised total cost of the project to$ 629,798.00 3.00 Amended Exhibits: Exhibit(s) A&B of said Agreement is amended by Attachment"A". 4.00 Contract Time: Paragraph 18.00 of said Agreement 06/30/2014 5.00 E-Verify: Vendors/Contractors: 1, shall utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the Vendor/Contractor during the term of the contract-, and 2. shall expressly require any subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the state contract to likewise utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the contract term. 42 725-030.07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 6111 Page 3 of 3 Financial Project No. 425138-1-84-01 Contract No. AP049 Agreement Date Except as hereby modified, amended or changed, all other terms of said Agreement dated 10/02/2009 and any subsequent supplements shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed,the day and year first above written. AGENCY FDOT Indian River County See attached Encumbrance Form for date of Funding AGENCY NAME Approval by Comptroller SIGNATORY(PRINTED OR TYPED) LEGAL REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIGNATURE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Director of Transportation Development TITLE TITLE APPROVED AS TO FORM AN GAL FF) B WILLIAM K.DEBRAAL DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY Al Financial Project No. 425138-1-84-01 Contract No. AP049 Agreement Date ATTACHMENT "A" SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT This Attachment forms an integral part of that certain Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and Indian River County 1801 27th Street,Vero Beach, FL 32967 dated DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLEMENT(Include justification for cost change): Indian River County will continue to provide regional transit service from Indian River mall(SR60,Vero Beach)to Indian River State College in Fort Pierce(St. Lucie County). To provide this service, a new route(Route13)has been established. Route 13 operates continuously on weekdays from 6:50AM to 5:OOPM. As Approved As Amended Net Change I' Project Cosi $598,712.00 $629,798.00 $31,086.00 As Approved As Amended Net II. Fund DPTO DPTO DPTO Department Transit Corridor Funds: $598,712.00 $629,798.00 $31,086.00 Agency: $ $ $ Federal: $ $ $ Total Project Cost $598,712.00 $629,798.00 $31,086.00 Comments: Deliverables: (1)A clear statement of the project's goals and a description of the process used to set and evaluate those goals. (2) Membership roster and meeting minutes of all Technical Advisory Group meetings. (3)Quarterly reports from the service provider. (4)An inventory of all capital acquisitions including description,state participation,current location, and cost when acquired. (5)Project justification (i.e.copy of designation in Transit Development Programs or Congestion Management Systems,Transit Corridor Plan; etc.) (6)An approved budget which reflects the breakdown of the total cost of the project, including any supplementals and required funding match. (7)Other, any additional deliverable requested by the state project manager, as a means of monitoring the funded project. C Page 1 of 2 44 GRANT NAME: FDOT Corridor Grant GRANT#: APO49 AMOUNT OF GRANT: $31,086 'DEPARTMENT RECEIVING GRANT:Community Development(pass through to Senior Resource Association 4 TACT PERSON:Phillip J.Matson PHONE#:-(772)226-1455 1. How long is the grant for? Five Years Starting Date:October 2.2009 2. Does the grant require you to fund this function after the grant is over? Yes X No 3. Does the grant require a match? Yes X No If yes,does the grant allow the match to be In Kind Services? Yes No 4. Percentage of grant to match: N/A % 5. Grant match amount required:$ 0 6. Where are the matching funds coming from(i.e.In Kind Services,Reserve for Contingency? N/A 7. Does the grant cover capital costs or start-up costs? X Yes No If no,how much do you think will be needed in capital costs or start-up costs? (Attach a detailed listing of costs.) 8. Are you adding any additional positions utilizing the grant funds? Yes X No If yes,please list. (If additional space is needed,please attach a schedule.) Acct. Description Position Position Position Position Position 011.12 Regular Salaries U11.13 Other Salaries&Wages(PT) 012.11 Social Security 012.12 Retirement Contributions 012.13 Life and Health Insurance 012.14 Worker's Compensation 012.17 Soc.Sec.Medicare Matching TOTAL 9. What is the total cost of each position including benefits,capital,start-up,auto expense,travel,and operating? Salaries and Benefits Operating Costs Capital Total Costs 10. What is the estimated cost of the grant to the County over five years?$0 Grant Amount Other Matching Costs Match Total First Year $31,086.00 $ $ $31,086.00 Second Year $ $ $ $ Third Year $ $ $ $ Fourth Year $ $ $ $ Fifth Year $ $ $ $ Signature of Preparers Date: n u.,..i,.,.....a 45 U� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engine SUBJECT: Selection of Firm to Provide Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Indian River County Shooting Range Improvements to Skeet&Trap Facility and Hunter Safety Training Building RFQ No. 2012024—1 RC Project No. 1135 DATE: May 9, 2013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On February 6, 2013, an advertisement for RFQ No. 2013017 for Professional Architectural and Engineering Services for Indian River County Shooting Range Improvements to Skeet&Trap Facility and Hunter Safety Training Building was posted in the Press Journal newspaper and on DEMANDSTAR, a nationwide internet-based government bid site. On March 13, 2013,four(4)submittal packages were received from the firms shown below: C. Vargas&Associates, Ltd. Jacksonville, Florida Donadio & Associates,Architects, PA Vero Beach, Florida Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects &Associates, PA Vero Beach, Florida MBV Engineering, Inc. Vero Beach, Florida The submittal packages are on file in the Purchasing Division office. A committee of five(5) staff members reviewed the packages and agreed to have all four(4)firms do presentations. Due to unforeseen circumstances, MBV Engineering, Inc. was unable to attend the presentation and withdrew from consideration. After the presentations, the committee ranked the remaining three (3)firms as follows: 1. Donadio&Associates, Architect, PA 2. Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects&Associates, PA 3. C.Vargas&Assocatiates, Ltd. Indian River County Shooting Range,located at 10455102nd Terrace,Sebastian,Florida will be improved to include expansions of the existing Skeet and Trap Range(includes three additional lighted stations), construction of a Hunter Safety Training Building,construction of a storage building and a paved parking lot addition to accommodate the new improvements. Fc\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1213-IRC Shooting Range-Skeet&Trap Improvemnts&Hunters Train Bldg\Admim\agenda items\RFQ Selection BCC agenda memo 05-21-13.doe A /+ PAGE TWO Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engineer May 21, 2013 Agenda Item FUNDING Funding for FY 12/13 in the amount of$590,000 is budgeted and available from Impact Fees/Parks/Sporting Clays Course-Skeet Trap,Account#10321072-066510-12001 RECOMMENDATION The following prioritized list is recommended by the Selection Committee: 1. Donadio&Associates, Architect, PA 2. Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects&Associates, PA 3. C.Vargas &Assocatiates, Ltd. Staff requests authorization to begin contract negotiations with the first ranked firm, Donadio & Associates, Inc. In the event negotiations with Donadio & Associates, Inc. are unsuccessful, staff requests authorization to then negotiate with the second ranked firm. DISTRIBUTION 1. Jerry Davis, Purchasing Manager 2. Holden Kriss, Range Manager 3. Donadio &Associates, Inc. 4. Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects &Associates, PA 5. C.Vargas&Associates, Inc. 6. MBV Engineering, Inc. Indian River County ApWQved Date APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Administration Budget FOR May 21,2013 _ Legal �' S BY A Purchasing General Services �`S 2 Public Works S^ 1-5- Engineering FAPublic Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1213-IRC Shooting Range-Skeet&Trap hnprovemnts&Hunters Train Bldg\Admim\agenda items\RFQ Selection BCC agenda memo 05-21-13.doc A7 �vER C O� INDIAN RIVER COUNTY q PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STORMWATER DIVISION 180127" STREET ORIV VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 Phone: (772) 226-1562 Rj MIN TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: W. Keith McCully, P.E., Stormwater Engineer 4�0 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WORK ORDER NO. PCM-1 FOR SEDIMENT REMOVAL AT PC MAIN SCREENING FACILITY DATE: May 10, 2013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The purpose of this Agenda Item is to request the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approve Work Order No. PCM-1 with EMC Divers, Inc. for sediment removal from the PC Main Screening Facility's treatment channel and sediment traps. PC Main is located in the Indian River Farms Water Control District's Main Relief Canal, north of the County Administration building complex. On April 23, 2013 the Board approved the Master Agreement for this work and this is the first Work Order under the Master Agreement. Collectively, the facility's two sedimentation traps hold approximately 148 cubic yards of sediment, equal to about eight 18-cubic yard dump trucks. Nitrogen and phosphorus are associated with many of the settable solids. Based on laboratory analysis, each sedimentation cell cleaning cycle (both cells cleaned) removes approximately 141 pounds of total nitrogen and 49 pounds of total phosphorus from the canal. These removals equal 35.25 and 24.50 forty-pound bags of 10-5-10 (N-P-K) fertilizer for total nitrogen and total phosphorus, respectfully. A significant amount of sediment containing total nitrogen and total phosphorus will also be removed during the cleaning of the facility's treatment channel. The cost of this Work Order is $14,600.00. FAIDublic Works\KeithM\Stormwater ProjectsNain Relief Canal Operation0redging Sedimentation Basins\Agenda Items\Agenda- Consent-Work Order#PCM-1 -4-22-2013.doc AR Page 2 PC South BCC Meeting — May 21, 2013 —CONSENT May 10, 2013 ANALYSIS Alternative No. 1 — Approve Work Order No. PCM-1 for $14,600.00 Alternative No. 2 — Reject Work Order No. PCM-1. FUNDING 1. Funding of the proposed $14,600.00 Work Order is budgeted and available from account #11128138-033490-07026, Transportation Fund/Stormwater/Other Contractual Services/Main Relief Canal Pollution Control System. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners: 1. Approve Alternative No. 1 — Approve Work Order No. PCM-1 with EMC Divers for $14,600.00 and authorize the Chairman to execute the Work Order on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENTS 1. Attachment A—Work Order No. PCM-1 (one copy) DISTRIBUTION 1. Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Director 2. County Attorney Office 3. Budget APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Indian River County Appyavqd Date Administration 61A113 FOR May 21, 2013 Budget <j 0 BY Leggy I 13 Public Works `�'`S`/ Stormwater Engineerings -2013 F•\Pnhlir.Wnrkc\KaithM\Stnrmwntar Prniar-z\Main Paliaf Canal flnarntinn\nrAHriinn Rarlimantatinn Racine\Ananrin Itamc\Ananria- ACI WORK ORDER NUMBER PCM-1 SEDIMENT REMMOVAL AT THE PC MAIN POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY This Work Order Number 1 is entered into as of this day of 2013, pursuant to that certain Master Agreement for Sediment Removal at the PC Main Pollution Control Facility, entered into as of April 23, 2013 ("Agreement"), by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and EMC Divers, Inc. ("CONTRACTOR"). The COUNTY has selected the CONTRACTOR to furnish complete sedimentation removal services for the PC Main Pollution Control Facility's two sediment cells and inlet channel. With this Work Order, the CONTRACTOR shall remove all sediment, debris, etc. from each sediment cell and from the treatment channel one time, in accordance with the Specifications set forth in the Agreement. The professional services will be performed by the CONTRACTOR for the fee schedule set forth in Attachment 1, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The CONTRACTOR will perform the professional services within the timeframe specified in the Agreement. Nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONTRACTOR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EMC Divers, Inc. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Chairman: Joseph E. Flescher Title: Date by BCC: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By Deputy Clerk Approved: & t &—.J sephaird, County Administrator Appro d as to orm d le I sufficiency: 1 William K. Debraal, Deputy County Attorney 1 fApublic works\keithm\stormwater projects\main relief canal operation\dredging sedimentation basins\contract and work orders\2013-2014 emc contract\work orders\work order 41.doc 50 ATTACHMENT 1 to WORK ORDER NO. 1 SEDIMENTATION SYSTEM DREDGING AT THE MAIN RELIEF CANAL POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY 1. COMPENSATION The COUNTY agrees to pay and the CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, a fee for services rendered according to the scope of this Work Order as follows: Item No. Description QTY Unit Unit Total Price Treatment Channel: Provide all labor, tools, equipment, supplies, utilities, materials, fuel, etc. to remove all captured material from the treatment channel and deposit the removed material in the 1 sediment recovery area, including but not limited to 1 EA $7,500.00 $7,500.00 mobilization, demobilization, insurance, managing the sediment recovery area during the Work and decanting clear liquid from it, clean up, and related incidentals. (The depth of material in the treatment channel is estimated to be approximately 1 foot. Sedimentation System: Provide all labor, tools, equipment, supplies, utilities, materials, fuel, etc. to remove all captured material from the two sediment cells and deposit the removed material in the sediment recovery area, including but not limited to 2 mobilization, demobilization, insurance, managing 1 EA $7,100.00 $7,100.00 the sediment recovery area during the Work and decanting clear liquid from it, clean up, and related incidentals. (The storage volume of Cell #1 is approximately 68 cubic yards and the storage volume of Cell#2 is approximately 80 cubicyards.) GRAND TOTAL BID (BID ITEM NO. 1 plus BID ITEM NO. 2 $14,600.00 2. PAYMENTS The CONTRACTOR shall submit a single invoice to the Indian River County Stormwater Division for all Work performed for the Work Order. Per F.S. 218.74(2), the COUNTY will pay approved invoices on or before the forty-fifth day after the COUNTY receives the CONTRACTOR's invoice. **END OF ATTACHMENT 1** Page 2 of 2 uti, t-i � r tom. �rL) ,acoRO" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE r 05/06D/YYYY) 05/06/13 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES 7W. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED E ESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMI—ORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER 407-869-0962 NAME: Michelle Benedict SIHLE INSURANCE GROUP,INC. 407-774-0936 PHONE 407-389-3527 ac No): 407-389-8427 P.O.BOX 160398 AIC No Ext ALTAMONTE SPRINGS,FL 32716 E''MAIL ;mbenedict@sihie.com James.Blakeley Newman - INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A:Commerce&Industry Insurance 19410 INSURED EMC Divers, Inc. INSURER B: 1190 Turnbull Bay Road New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF IfJSURANCE ADDL SUB POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR POLICY NUMBER MMIDD,'YYYY` MM/DD, GENERAL LIABILITY EACH QCC1JRRENCE $ DAMAGE TRENTED COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES Ea occurrence $ CLAIMS-MADE F-1 OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ POLICY PRO LOC $ rOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident $ ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS AUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ HIRED AUTOS AUTOS Per accident UMBRELLA UAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS UAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION$ $ WORKERS COMPENSATIONX WC STATU- OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY T Y IM E A ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y/❑N NIA C4321709 05/03/13 05/03/14 E.L EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,0U OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) E.L DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,00 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below EL_DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,00 A USL&H C4321709 05/03/13 05/03/14 USL&H Statuto A Maritime C4321709 05/03/13 05/03/14 Marine Em 1,000,00 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,if more space Is required) Reference: Indian River County Bid #2013023 - Annual Bid for Sediment Removal at PC Main CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN Indian River County ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Building Division 1801 27th Street AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Vero Beach,FL 32960 9 ) ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010105) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD r 9 PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS: 5/21/13 Ofice Of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr. — County Attornq�rC DATE: May 15, 2013 RE: Public Notice of Public Hearing Scheduled for June 4, 2013 to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 213 of the Code of Indian River County to Add a Section to Chapter 213 Creating a Second Additional Property Tax Homestead Exemption for Qualifying Senior Citizens The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, June 4, 2013, to consider adoption of an ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 213 OF THE CODE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO ADD SECTION 213._ CREATING A SECOND ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFYING SENIOR CITIZENS; AND PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. /nhm ns:}An, DatAAam'-ROVED FOR �Zf � / regB.C.C. MEETING � suI Dept GOUNTY . TTORNEyj -. PUBLIC NOTICE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator DEP MENT HEAD CONCURRENCE Robert eating,AICP Comm evelopment Director FROM: Sasan Rohani,AICP //^ Chief, Long-Range Planning DATE: May 7, 2013 SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearings for Upcoming Board Meetings It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2013. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Please be advised that the following public hearing items have been scheduled for Board consideration: June 11,2013 Consideration of the disposition of county owned surplus properties for affordable housing. (Administrative) July 2,2013 Vero Estates, LLC's request to amend the text of the Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element of the county's comprehensive plan. (Legislative) RECOMMENDATION: The above referenced public hearing items are provided for the Board's information. No action is needed at this time. FACommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Teat AmendmentsUanuary 2013 FLU element policy 5.6\Staff Reports\BCC Notice of final Public Hearing July 2,2013.doc 54 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River Co. Approved Date FOR• 1 01 Admin. (Q� i BY: Legal Budget Dept. 15-A/1,; Risk Mgr. FXommunity Development\Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments\January 2013 FLU element policy 5.6\Staff Reports\BCC Notice of final Public Hearing July 2,2013.doc S PUBLIC NOTICE ITEM: 5/21/13 Of ce of ��G INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,s ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W. Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: illiam K. DeBraal - Deputy County Attorney DATE: May 15, 2013 SUBJECT: Notice of Closed Attorney-Client Session Scheduled for June 4, 2013 Relating to Two Separate Pending Cases Filed by Frederick D. Mensing, III Against Indian River County Notice is hereby given that the Indian River County Attorney desires an attorney- client session with the Board of County Commissioners at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 4, 2013 regarding two separate pending cases filed by Frederick D. Mensing, III against Indian River County styled: Frederick D. Mensing, Ill, and Rita F. Mensing v. Indian River County, pending in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Case No. 312010CA075009 and Frederick D. Mensing, 111 v. Indian River County, Robert Solari, Gary C. Wheeler, Wesley S. Davis, Peter D. O'Brian [sic], William G. Collins, ll, Robert Keating, Christopher N. Kirrie, Christopher William Kirrie, and Robert Chester Kirrie, pending in the Circuit Court of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Case No. 312012CA000976 _ �a cr %a APgr0V Dale 1 7 A-PPROVED FOR O.C,Cr�EETIN G - t0UtTI�ATTORNEY/ RzSK ��. 5 6 • The subject matter of the meeting will be settlement negotiations and strategy relating to litigation expenses. The session will commence at an open meeting in the County Commission Chambers located on the first floor of Building A of the County Administration Complex, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, will continue at a closed meeting in the County Commissioners' Conference Room located on the second floor of Building A of the County Administration Complex and will terminate at an open meeting in the County Commission Chambers. The estimated time of the attorney-client session is forty-five (45) minutes. Present at the meeting will be Commissioners Joseph E. Flescher, Wesley S. Davis, Tim Zorc, Peter D. O'Bryan, and Bob Solari. Also present will be Deputy County Attorney William K. DeBraal, County Administrator Joseph A. Baird, and a certified court reporter. nhm 2 57 PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS ® May 21, 2013 106 5-,* INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: May 15, 2013 SUBJECT: Public Notice of Scheduled Workshop — Presentation on Natural Gas Expansion FROM: Tim Zorc, County Commissioner District 3 A workshop will be held by Florida City Gas on Friday, May 24, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. at the Indian River County Administration Building "B", Conference Room B1-501 regarding the expansion of natural gas. For more information, call the Indian River County Board of Commissioners office at 772-226-1490. 59 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ® INDIAN RIVER C /� COUNTY,FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator FROM: Olt" 'j Robert M. Keating, AICP; ommunity evelopment Director DATE: May 13, 2013 SUBJECT: Consideration of Commissioner Zorc's Proposed Economic Development Initiatives It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2013. DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS At the May 7,2013 Board of County Commissioners meeting,Commissioner Tim Zorc had an item under his matters relating to Economic Development Council(EDC)Composition and the Sunshine Law. During discussion of that item, Commissioner Zorc noted that he had submitted a list of economic development initiatives to the EDC for its consideration,but the EDC had not discussed the proposed initiatives because of time constraints at the several meetings where the initiatives were agendaed. In response,the Board of County Commissioners invited Commissioner Zorc to bring his proposed initiatives directly to the Board. Attached to this report is a matrix showing each of Commissioner Zorc's initiatives and actions needed by staff and the BCC to address the initiatives. As indicated in the matrix, some of the initiatives require research and analysis by staff, while others can be addressed by the Board immediately. ANALYSIS To start the process of addressing Commissioner Zorc's initiatives, the Board of County Commissioners needs to direct staff to undertake some or all of the actions identified in the attached matrix. Once the Board directs staff to begin work, staff can start on the referenced actions. Given the number of initiatives and the amount of research and analysis required, the process will take several months. FACommunity Development\Users\CDADMUAAGENDA\2013\Consideration of Commissioner Zorc's Proposed Economic Development 1 Initiatives 052113.doc 59 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review the attached Economic Development Initiatives Matrix, identify needed changes, and direct staff to begin work on the initiatives. Attachments: 1. Economic Development Initiatives Matrix 2. Commissioner Zorc's List of Economic Development Initiatives APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River Co, App e Date Admin. FOR: 41 Leggy Budget 4 BY: Dept. Risk Mgr. F:\Community Development\Users\CDADMIN\AGENDA\2013\Consideration of Commissioner Zorc's Proposed Economic Development Initiatives 052113.doc s Commissioner Zorc's Economic Development Initiatives Initiative Number Initiative Description Staff Action BCC Action Comments 1 Establish Foreign Trade Zone in Initiate process to select Appropriate funding ($7,500) Possible sub zone to Port County Foreign Trade zone for and approve selection of Canaveral consultant consultant 2 Expand Enterprise Zone to Add Research Enterprise Zone Approve Enterprise Zone Industrial Areas Expansion Regulations boundary modifications 3 Join Regional "Open for Research "Open for Approve IRC participation in Business" Program Business" Program program, if beneficial for IRC 4 Increase Building Height Limit in Draft Land Development Approve LDR Amendment Building height has been Commercial/Industrial Node at Regulations (LDR) controversial in the past; I-95/SR 60 Amendment and staff geograpic limits and criteria report necessary 5 Increase Commercial Land Research need/justification If warranted, direct staff to • This issue was addressed in Use/Zoning Along SR 60 for additional commercial initiate Future Land Use recent Comprehensive Plan along SR 60 and report.to Element Amendment Evaluation and Appraisal BCC Report 6 Modify Impact Fees to add more Complete Impact Fee Approve Impact Fee Study Review of commercial use Commercial Use Categories and Study consultant selection update categories is a component of Establish Impact Fee Hearing process and work with impact fee study scope of Board consultant services 7 Expand Fiber Optic and Natural Research options and costs Appropriate funding and Gas Lines for expanding Fiber Optic approve expansion plan and Natural Gas lines in County. Develop expansion plan Attachment 1 i Commissioner Zorc's Economic Development Initiatives Initiative Number Initiative Description Staff Action BCC Action Comments 8 Modify the Composition of the Identify composition of Approve alternative EDC Economic Development Council EDCs in other counties and composition (EDC) prepare staff report 9 Expand Go-Line Bus System to Coordinate with Transit No action necessary. TDP is a TDP is currently being serve Business Needs Development Plan (TDP) MPO responsibility updated consultants to evaluate Go- Line routes to ensure that business needs are met 10 Attract Businesses (employers) Research issue and prepare Take action as necessary This issue was researched by that are counter cyclical to the staff report staff in the 1990's. No citrus industry counter cyclical businesses were identified at that time 11 Evaluate functioning of the Review recent staff Take action as necessary Economic Development Council research on economic (EDC) development activities of other counties and identify changes that County should make. Prepare staff report 12 Evaluate opportunities to use EB- Indentify possible Take action as necessary 5 program opportunities to use EB-5 program to promote economic development. Prepare staff report. Attachment 1 V County Commissioner Liaison Tim Zorc 2013 Goals and Objectives for Economic Development Council to Consider adopting all or in part. 1. Foreign Trade Zone-FTZ The establishment of a County wide FTZ as a sub zone to Port Canaveral will allow current and future businesses to take advantage with little cost and paperwork to receive Federal Foreign Trade Zone status. Helene, Jason and myself recently attended a program at the Port of Canaveral and the process laid out by the consultant who the port is under contract with is fairly simple and reasonably proceed. The price and timeline mentioned by the consultant was $7,500 and approximately 6- months but we would need someone to complete a more in depth review of the process and cost. Once the FTZ is established for the County any business can apply and be approved in 30-days. Port Canaveral FTZ-136 would be our sponsoring agency. 2. Enterprise Zone The current Enterprise Zone is primarily located around the Vero Beach Airport and Gifford area. Originally established to match up with Census Data that indicated high areas of unemployment. We are currently using only a fraction of our allocated total allowable acreage. Can we use the Enterprise Boundary Amendment process to expand our Enterprise Zone to add acreage in areas like Fellsmere, Sebastian and the Industrial area around I-95 and Highway 60 and others? We need to see if we can also take advantage of the Boundary Amendment process to expand our Enterprise Zone. 3. Open for Business Initiative Over the past year our neighbors to the north and west collaborated together to form "Open for Business" The primary goal of these counties and the businesses located there is to streamline the permitting process so that anywhere in these counties you will have the same set of permit forms. To learn more and watch the web broadcast visit t.ywl.openforbusillessc0.conI 4. Building height Restrictions 1-95 and Highway 60 Industrial properties Most of you have toured the CVS facility out west on Highway 60. For that facility to be built originally the company needed to request a height increase to accommodate the German designed and manufactured high-tech automated storage system. 1 have heard discussions from some local realtors that the current height restrictions are not conducive for the newer automated storage systems now being proposed. During a recent tour of 1 ATTACHMENT 2 .2C, the facility those comments were validated. To better understand the automated storage facilities its best described as the building is a wrapper for the system not the building houses the system. One such situation described was that by raising a portion of the building height by 1/3 of the building foot print by 25' the storage capacity of that floor area is increased by 25%. This industry is cost conscience and if we need more height than what is the magic number? We need to clearly define what needs to be changes so that we can propose changes to these zoned areas so that they can accommodate these newer systems. 5. Highway 60 Commercial Nodes Available Acreage When driving along Highway 60 you see a lot of vacant acreage. The only problem is that most of this acreage is zoned for other uses other than Commercial or a combined use where Commercial is only allowed if multi-family is included in the project. If you take form 74`" Avenue to the west and 43rd Avenue to the east you have very little vacant acreage that is zoned commercial, I have had conversations with a company that assist national retail companies that have expressed the desire to have a presence here in IRC. However they are site challenged and cannot find a suitable place to locate. The issue appears to be that current land development regulations require that we are built out to 80 percent, currently we are at 78 percent+-. We need to see what LDR needs to be changed so that we can add more commercial space to have available to those companies currently looking to have a presence here in IRC. 6. Impact Fees Community Development department has drafted a RFQ for consultants to complete a detailed review of all Impact Fees. I mentioned at the meeting last week that there may be some additions that EDC might want to have the consultant work on. 1. would like to have specific areas of review that the consultant report will cover. A detailed review of all businesses types or the possible addition of new businesses categories so that we are only collecting for the actual demand that the business or facility is placing on our infrastructure. CVS distribution facility for example where I feel that the amount of traffic trips charges was vastly more than the actual amount used on a daily basis. These are unique facilities and a unique category and fee structure should be developed. Another area that I think we can be creative is a way to establish Impact Fee banking or the • ability to transfer vested capacity from an existing use to another property. 2 64 The concept of having an Impact Fee hearing or local appeals board similar to the value adjustment board to dispute property taxable values. Current ordinance does allow the ability to challenge an impact fee but the cost to challenge is excessive. 7. Fiber Optic& Natural Gas One big sticking point to attract new high tech businesses is the need for readily available Fiber Optics. The county has a some initiatives underway but we need to stay on top of this issue and see where EDC can help out. Natural Gas has been recently expanded in the mid and northern parts of the County. This newly expended system will assist both new and existing business that are located or wish to locate in these new service areas. We need to have a full understanding of all the benefits those potential users who may benefit from Natural Gas and Fiber Optics so we can best promote their existence in the County. 8. EDC Member Composition It has been 10 years since the non-municipal membership has been reviewed.Possibly it's time to look to add other outside specific business or industry groups to the EDC for membership. The last review of the EDC membership was to include representatives from the municipalities. With 1 I of the 22 representatives essentially from government or Chambers we may not have enough diversification from the Private sector part of the Committee.-Should representatives for large and small scale realtors be a member or should we have a member designation for business attorney or other types of representatives that are currently not part of the membership. 9. Go Line Bus System We are very fortunate to have one of the best run bus systems here in IRC. This is attributed to MPO director Phil Matson and Karen Degal at the SRA. We need to be part of the input to help make sure that routs are serving both the residential needs but also the business community needs. Currently the MPO they are conducting the 10-year review of the system and its roots. An expanding bus system is a vital part of our economic development plan. 10. Off Seasons Citrus Alternatives The Citrus industry plays a big role here in IRC. However much of that role is seasonal. What can we do to help fill the unemployment gap when the seasons and before the next season starts? What outside the box thinking is out there to try to find an employment opportunity for these seasonal workers? 3 �5 11. How we conduct EDC Business Development For IRC EDC to be a competitive operation I think we need to look at surrounding and similar Counties on how they operate their EDC operations. Are they public, private combined efforts? What companies have been most successfiil in expanding their existing and new business bases? What are they doing that we are not. How are they funded, what role does the public sector provide? If we are competing for the same share of these new businesses that Gov. Scott has been working hard to recruited to come to Florida we need to be out front with innovations and ideas so that we stand out. A recent in house competitive review of the adjoining counties was completed and could be used as a starting point. Resources of outside nonmembers for special projects like these. Listed is a partial list or willing participants. Ralph Poppell, Dan Richie, Kevin Berry, John Dyer, and many others have offered to assist in being part of effort. 12.EB-5 Immigrant Investor USCIS administers the Immigrant Investor Program,also known as "EB-5,"created by Congress in 1990 to stimulate the U.S. economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors.Under a pilot immigration program first enacted in 1992 and regularly reauthorized since,certain EB-5 visas also are set aside for investors in Regional Centers designated by USCIS based on proposals for promoting economic growth. All EB-5 investors must invest in a new commercial enterprise and invest$500,000 to 1,000,000 in the new enterprise. Indian River County especially Fellsmere has hosted many foreign visitors looking to invest in. US Companies via the EBS Program. We should look to see how we can maximize this program by identifying all possible means to increase exposure for the County. 060 4 66 n Economic Development Initiatives i Economic Development Initiatives # Description Staff Action BCC Action Comments 1 Establish Initiate Approve Port Foreign Trade Consultant Funding & Canaveral Zone Selection Consultant Subzone 2 Expand Research Approve Enterprise EZ Regu- EZ Zone lations changes 3 Join Open For Research Approve Business Program Partici- pation ��- A -� 5/23/2013 Economic Development Initiatives # Description Staff Action BCC Comments Action 4 Increase Draft LDR Approve Controver- BLDG Hgt Amendment LDR sial in past SR 60/1-95 & Report Amendm 5 Increase Research If War- Addressed in Comm Along Need & ranted, EAR SR 60 Justification direct staff to initiate CPA 6 Modify Complete IF Approve In Scope of Impact Fees I Study Study services Economic Development Initiatives # Description Staff BCC Comments Action Action 7 Expand Research Approve Fiber $ Gas Develop Plan & Plan Fund 8 Modify EDC Research Approve Com- Other Changes position Counties g Expand Go- Evaluate No Ac- TDP Being Line for in TDP Tion MPO Updated businesses Study Responsi bility 6&-A 2 5/23/2013 Economic Development Initiatives # Description Staff BCC Comments Action Action 10 Attract Research Take Researched Countercy- Issue & action, as Previously Clical busi- Prepare necessary No nesses Staff Report businesses 11 Evaluate Research & Take Functioning Prepare Action, as of EDC Staff Report necessry 12 Evaluate EB- Research & Take 5 Op- Prepare Action, as portunities Report necessary f�6 A- 3 Departmental Matters Community Development INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A.Baird, County Administrator VIS O HEAD CONCURRENCE 04c obert M.Keating, P, Co unity Development Director FROM: Sasan Rohani,AICP,Chief,Long-Range Planning 5W DATE: May 15,2013 RE: EVALUATION OF THE GIFFORD NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN It is the requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 21, 2013. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS At the April 16, 2013 Board of County Commissioners meeting, Commissioner Wesley Davis requested that the Board direct staff to update the Gifford Neighborhood Plan. After discussion,the Board directed staff to evaluate the Gifford Neighborhood Plan (GNP), provide information regarding implementation of the plan, and identify needs for updating the plan. This is that evaluation. BACKGROUND In July 1999, the Board of County Commissioners created a task force to identify issues that existed in Gifford and to make recommendations regarding those issues to the County Commission. To ensure that the task force would be effective, the County Commission requested that the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce appoint task force members representing agencies that contribute to economic development in the Gifford community. For the next year, the task force worked on that project. In July 2000, the Task Force presented its findings and recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners (Attachment 1). Based on those recommendations, the Board directed county planning staff to develop a neighborhood plan for the Gifford Community. 1 67 Staff then worked with the Progressive Civic League of Gifford and the Gifford community to prepare the Gifford Neighborhood Plan (GNP). That process involved obtaining considerable input from Gifford residents at several large and small community meetings/workshops conducted by county planning staff and the Progressive Civic League of Gifford. The resulting draft plan contained data, analysis, goals, strategies, objectives, and actions. On August 26, 2002, a Gifford town hall community meeting was held where neighbor-hood residents reviewed the final draft of the plan. At that meeting, the community endorsed the plan and recommended that the plan be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration. At its regular meeting of September 17, 2002, the Board unanimously approved the plan. The plan is still in effect and is posted on the county's website. ANALYSIS The purpose of the GNP was to address problems that were of special concern to the residents of Gifford. While the plan focused on one community within the county, the strategies and actions of the plan were consistent with the policies and objectives of the county's overall Comprehensive Plan. Included in the GNP is an existing conditions section, an analysis section, a plan section, and an implementation section. When approved, the plan's existing conditions section of the plan included the most up to date land use, zoning, infrastructure and economic data that were available at the time. Based on those data, the plan's analysis was performed, and opportunities and constraints in Gifford were identified. From that analysis, specific goals, objectives, strategies, and actions were developed and "incorporated into an "action plan" section. Finally, an implementation section that identified the entity responsible for each action and each action's completion date was developed. Overall, the GNP's strategies were divided into the following major issue categories: • Housing • Town Center • Illegal and non-conforming uses • Infrastructure • Crime • Employment As structured, the plan contains 14 objectives that relate to the major issue areas listed above. Under each objective, there is a set of specific actions that contribute to meeting the objective. The plan contains 54 specific actions. In the plan, the major initiatives include enhancing the housing stock, creating a town center, upgrading and maintaining infrastructure, increasing employment opportunities, expanding code enforcement activities to increase code compliance, and reducing Gifford's unemployment level. 2 RR Because the Gifford Neighborhood Plan was a coordinated effort among a number of groups, there are several governmental agencies and community organizations with responsibilities for implementing actions identified in the plan. During plan preparation, planning staff coordinated with the responsible parties to ensure that identified actions were financially feasible and that timeframes for implementation were realistic. Table 8 of the GNP contains an implementation matrix. Since plan adoption, staff has kept track of the status of each implementation action. Periodically, county planning staff has coordinated with other county departments.and responsible agencies to keep the matrix updated. Also, the status of the implementation matrix has been shared with the Progressive Civic League of Gifford and other interested parties to keep the community informed as to the progress of the plan(see attachment#4). ASSESSMENT OF THE GIFFORD NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN As structured, the Gifford Neighborhood Plan is comprehensive and addresses most of the important issues that the Gifford community expressed in the late 1990's and early 2000's. That being said, the plan has now been in place for eleven years, a period during which many changes have occurred. For that reason, it is important to assess the plan and determine where the plan needs to be revised. • DATA AND ANALYSIS SECTION OF THE PLAN At this time, data contained in the plan are now more than 10 years old and need to be updated. As those data are being updated, the analysis section of the plan also needs to be updated. With the passage of time and the changes in conditions, a new analysis may reveal new problems or opportunities that can be addressed in an updated plan. Actions required to update the plan are discussed later in this report. • IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Each action of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan is listed within the Plan's Implementation Matrix. That matrix indicates whether the county,the Progressive Civic League of Gifford(PCLG)or some other party is responsible for implementing that action. Further, the implementation matrix identifies which county department is responsible for implementing a given action. While the original implementation matrix was created in order to assign responsibility for undertaking actions, the matrix has since been used by staff as a management tool to identify whether or not actions have been implemented (see attachment#4). For actions not implemented,a brief description of why the action was not implemented is provided in the implementation matrix. Following is a summary of the implementation of the plan's 54 specific actions: Overall,42 (78%)of the plan's 54 actions have been fully implemented,while 2 (4%)of the actions have been partially implemented, and 9 (17%)of the actions have not been implemented. Although 3 nQ nine actions have not been fully implemented, that is somewhat misleading because Actions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 are related and constitute one overall action. The same is true for Actions 4.6 and 4.7. Looked at from that perspective, only six of the 54 actions in the plan have not been implemented. The Actions that were not implemented are discussed below: Action 1.6: states that "the county will assist Gifford residents in forming neighborhood associations to promote property maintenance and neighborhood conditions" Implementation Status: That action was not implemented because no interest was expressed by the community in forming neighborhood associations. Action 3.5: states that "the county will institute rezoning action, when and where appropriate,to change RM-10 zoning to RS-6 zoning. Implementation Status: That action was not implemented because it calls for down zoning, which is generally considered to be a taking (under the Bert Harris property rights law) unless there is a willing property owner. So far, no property owners have expressed a willingness to accept a down-zoning, and there have been no requests for down-zonings. Actions 4.1, 4.2, and 4:3: are related to creating a Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center (NCAC) for Gifford. At the time that the plan was developed, there were concerns expressed that Gifford did not have its own major shopping center and that residents were forced to travel to other areas for shopping, including grocery shopping. Residents also expressed concerns that purchasing needed items from local convenience stores near or within Gifford resulted in residents paying higher prices than the prices charged in grocery stores. In response to those concerns, the Neighborhood Activity Center concept was included in the plan. As identified in the plan, the county had to rezone some properties from residential to commercial to create the Gifford NCAC. Implementation Status: In 2003,the county initiated the rezoning actions needed to create a Gifford Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center. Despite support from the community at large and community leaders, some of the potentially affected property owners and some of the nearby residents objected to creating a Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center based on a belief that the proposed rezoning would increase their property value and consequently increase their property taxes. Those owners expressed concerns that they could not afford the increased property taxes and could lose their property if taxes increased (see Attachment#5). Due to property owner objections,the county,with the concurrence of the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, stopped all actions to establish the Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center for Gifford. Action 4.4: states that the county will construct sidewalks and street improvements along 45`�eet and 43`d Avenue. Implementation Status: That action has not been implemented due to insufficient right-of- way. When 45 Street west of 43`d Avenue was recently resurfaced, the county attempted to install sidewalks,but was unable to do so because of right-of-way constraints. Actions 4.6 and 4.7: relates to building on street parking spaces and making streetscape f 4 70 improvements along 45th Street and 43`d Avenue. Implementation Status: Several years ago, the County allocated $200,000.00 for that action. The money was then used for streetscape improvements (curbing) on 45th Street west of 43`d Avenue. Subsequently, an additional $200,000.00 was put in the budget for that project. Recently, the county proposed using Brownfield grant funds to design streetscape improvements along 45th Street, but the funding agency indicated that that was not an eligible expense. Currently, $200,000.00 is in the budget for that project, and staff expects to proceed with the project in the future. Action 4.8: states that"the county will work with owners of existing businesses in the area to obtain funds for property renovation and expansion". Implementation Status: After adoption of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan, staff researched the possibility of obtaining Community Development Block Grant funds for renovation and expansion projects. Staff, however, found that the subject area did not qualify for CDBG commercial revitalization funding. Action 12.1: states that the public works department will construct parking spaces, restrooms, benches, picnic areas, a children's playground, and basketball courts for the Hosie-Schumann Park. Implementation Status: That action was not implemented due to lack of funding. PLAN UPDATE As referenced above, many changes have occurred since the Gifford Neighborhood Plan was adopted eleven years ago. Therefore, it would be appropriate to update the plan to address current issues and challenges. Although all of the plan's actions have not been implemented, 82% of those have been,and most of those that were not implemented did not have community support. So the Gifford Neighborhood Plan has not sat on the shelf. When the Board of County Commissioners discussed the Gifford Neighborhood Plan at its April 16, 2013 meeting, there was discussion of initiating a more comprehensive approach to addressing Gifford issues. Specifically, there was reference to law enforcement and education. While the current plan does not specifically address those issues, an update of the plan could involve coordination with the Sheriff's office and the School District. As with original plan development, updating the plan will require coordinating with interested residents, community organizations, and appropriate county departments. Throughout that process, staff will need to identify the community's current concerns, issues, opportunities, and constraints. That will involve the following steps: • Update the plan's data section with the most recent available information • Update the analysis section based on the new data and input from Gifford residents 5 71 • Identify the community's current issues and concerns • Identify current opportunities and constraints in the Gifford area • Draft new objectives and actions, where appropriate, to address residents' concerns, issues and opportunities. • Submit the updated plan for BCC consideration CONCLUSION Overall, the Gifford Neighborhood Plan has been successful. That can be attributed to more than 82% of the plan's action items having been implemented. Despite that success,there are still issues in Gifford that need to be addressed. By coordinating with the Progressive Civic League of Gifford and involving various governmental and non-governmental agencies and organizations, the county can update the plan and benefit the community. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board direct staff to coordinate with the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, interested residents, and other interested organizations to update the Gifford Neighborhood Plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Workforce Enhancement Task Force Recommendations 2. Copy of the 2002 Gifford Neighborhood Plan(at the BCC office) 3. Copy of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan goals, strategies,and actions 4. Copy of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan implementation matrix with status 5. Memo dated September 30, 2003, responding to resident's questions regarding Gifford Neighborhood Commercial Activity Centers n ian Approved vate River Co. Approved Agenda Item: ACirftin. ega -(S- For: a0/3 Budgett5 13 Dept. By. Risk Mgr. FACommunity Development\Gifford Plan\Staff Reports\2013 Evaluation of the GNP-agenda item for the May 21,2013 BCC meeting.doc N 6 7*2 • , 1 Indian River County Chamber of Commerce DATE: August a, 2000 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Freddie Woolfork, Chairman Workforce Enhancement Task Force RE: Task Force Findings and Recommendations TASK FORCE INITIATED On July 15, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners requested a task force of agencies who contribute to economic development in the Gifford community be brought together by the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce to: 1. look at distressed areas of the County; 2. identify common issues in order to avoid duplication of services; 3. create a listing of findings; 4. make recommendations back to the County Commission. The purpose of this report is to provide the County Commission the findings of this Ad-Hoc Task Force:named the "Workforce Enhancement Task Force." The group began meeting in AuDLst 1999 and addressed the Gifford community. They discussed items such as how to develop jobc and careers, promoting mainstream employment opportunities, transportation, li;htinR and other topics wr_.,uh Iinust 'be included when looking at now Elie peopie, young and old alike, u: tills community view themselves;, their opportunities to get a job and a better job, how they live, and how they communicate their needs and concerns within and outside the community. REPRESENTATION Task Force volunteer participants included: Freddie Woolfork, Director, Gifford Youth Activities Center Min Bagley, Supervisor, Workforce and Employment Opportunities, Vero Beach Office Edmund Cannon, Citizen. A.J. Harris, President, Gifford Civic Progressive League Victor Hart, President, NAACP John K,raczkowski, Business Services Coordinator, Workforce Development Board of the Treasure Coast William Mosley, Executive Director, Gifford Economic Development Council Katie Nall, .Executive Director, Indian River County Healthy Start. Julius Reason, Citizen, Entreprenvur Jacquelyn Reason, Entrepreneur and Private Business Owner Dr. David Sullivan, Provost, Indian River Community College Penny Chandler, Executive Director, Indian River County Chamber of Commerce milt Thomas, Economic Deveiopment Director, (former) Indian River County Chamber of Commerce .. ._..,,_,, ..._.........,, .T_. . .,.. ., George Haygood, Economic Development Director, Indian.River County Chamber of Commerce David Pearson, Habitat For HUM*VA\,4 B E R o F C O M M E R C E 1216 21st Street • PO. Box 2_947 • Vero Beach, FL 32961 •Tei 561.567.349 :• Fax 55��l���•1' �� htto://www.vera-beach.fl.us/chamber • e-mail: chambert,@vem-hP9 :1Carh_ a 1 SUTYLVIARY The "Workforce Enhancement Task Force" has successfully brought together the agencies who contribute to economic and workforce development in the Gilford community. This group of professionals have examined basic econonuc development, workforce development and workforce enhancement initiatives currently provided in the community and have identified there is little or no duplication of services or effort within the community. On the contrary, the group found there to be an informal awareness and collaboration among groups,.and public and private agencies who work within Gifford. The Task Force hereby makes the recommendations contained in this report to the members of the County Commission for their action. By addressing the issues presented in this report, the Board of County Commissioners will send a positive message of commitment to those who are unemployed or underemployed and to the young people who are looking to build a future in Indian River County. Helping all of our citizens will enable them to share in the quality of life for which Indian River County is known. It is recommended that the County continue the efforts of this Task Force so that these identified initiatives can be successfully achieved. In order to accomplish the tasks at hand and the recommendations presented here, the Task Force identified as the number one priority to encourage the County Commission to establish and fund an office within county government that will be empowered by the County Commission to work with any and all public offices, agencies, educational institutions, government officials or representatives and all private groups, organizations, and individuals to coordinate and carry forth the plan of action for short-term and lone-term success of a program generated by these findings. It is the feeling of the task force that this office can achieve success if it is staffed by someone who is intimately fauuliar with the community and motivated to move the recommendations forward to implementation. Although this report focuses on the Gifford community, it's recommendations can be applied to other specific areas of the county. And, the impact of any action taken on the recommendations in this report will positively effect our entire county_ BACKGROUND ISSUES • The economic base of the county is historically dependent on agriculture and service industries, resulting in high seasonal unemployment. • The County is making efforts to balance our economic base by increasing the number of full-time, better paying value added jobs. These jobs require higher skill levels. - • Certain population groups within the county have not been considered part of the mainstream labor market and consequently lack the skills necessary to advance into higher skilled positions. • Target minority communities have large numbers of unemployed or underemployed job seekers. Area businesses seek employees. However, available jobs do not match available people. • Training and education programs are available but, for a variety of reasons, the target job seekers are not always able to take advantage of these programs. 74 • Unemployment benefits have contributed to a change of attitude in the workforce. • There is a negative perception of the Gifford community that deters possible employers from locating in this area. ISSUES IDENTMCATION The following special issues were identified: • Job opportunities are needed for all population and skill groups within the county. • All lower economic areas of the county should be addressed in any effort. • Transportation options to and from work are a concern in some areas. • Recognize that unemployment benefits have contributed to a change of attitude in the worlsorce. • Integrate people back into the workforce who have paid their debt to society. • The chronically unemployed often lack basic He skills. • Quality infant and child care may be a concern to some families(employees), and may be essential to many prospective employees. • Jobs paying less than $7.00/hn to start do not motivate the chronically unemployed whose work history has been in low paying jobs with no advancement. As a rule, college graduates do not return to Indian River County,future leaders leaving the area. A C T 110 NS TAKE • Survey of needs: Survey of employed and unemployed conducted at two Gifford community civic events. "Attachment I" shows a list of questions asked and the responses. A small sample of 25 people were surveyed. More surveys must be completed to obtain a better sample and reliable statistics. • "Project H.O.P.E." (Hope, Opportunity, Preparation and Employment): A Gifford community event held on November 13, 1999 at the Gifford Youth Activities Center. Representatives from a variety of agencies were available to provide information on available services to improve individual economic status. John V. Burns, an expert on entrepreneurship, provided information to people interested in starting their own businesses. Agencies included: SCORE (Service Corps of Retired Executives); Treasure Coast Job Training Center, Workforce Development Board; Division of Workforce and Employment Opportunities; Gifford Economic Development Council;Agricultural Labor Program; Gifford Youth Activities Center, Indian River County Public Schools; Department of Children and Families; Gifford Civic Progressive League; Indian River Community College; Economic Opportunities Council; Indian River County Chamber of ,. Commerce_ • Bus Tour of Gifford Communitv: The Workforce Enhancement Task Force spent a morning in March touring specific locations in the Gifford area Task Force Chairman Freddie Woolfork directed the tour. "Attachment II." 7.9 4 • Existing community assets were identified and are named. "Attachment III." GENERAL FINDINGS • The county's 20 most in-demand jobs paying a starting wage averaging $7.00 per hour have been identified by the Workforce Development Board along with the skill sets necessary to qualify for each of those jobs. See review of jobs and qualifications at tcjobs.org • Federal and state grants are also available to help people upgrade to better jobs. The Indian River Community College Vice President of Grants Programs is available to help discuss grant opportunities. • Funds for chronic unemployment may be available from state and federal agencies, Black Minority Business Funds, Workforce Development Board_ • The Minority Business Enterprise Small Business Initiative is identifying minority owned businesses in Indian River County that would be eligible for Federal and State set aside contracts. • Indian River Community College held a Basic Entrepreneurship Training Program in Gifford and is willing to do more outreach. • Manufacturers and other businesses need employees. • Drugs, criminal records, and credit records block the efforts of the unemployed to find jobs. SPECIFIC FINDINGS • Transportation: Affects the job seeker's ability to take advantage of opportunities including training/schooling, community events, service providing agencies, child care, and the ability to find work Community Coach currently has fined route service to Gifford and in some cases an informal transportation arrangement is available to workers. • Industry Recruitment: Industrial1commercial property is available within the Gifford community. For certain businesses, a readily available workforce would be an attractive` incentive. • Industry Initiatives: Some businesses have expressed interest in hiring the chronically unemployed and underemployed. Those businesses would work with the Gifford Youth Activities Center, Career One Stop Center, WAGES Program, Indian River Community t College and other service providers. s z.: • Child Care: Available, affordable day care is critical Gifford Youth Activities Center Zi # provides limited child monitoring and day care based on job-related criteria. The Adderly Home in Gifford may be converted to a child care center to handle up to 100 children_ a ,CC T -_ j Child care is not affordable for 2 parent families because they do not qualify for benfits. • Life Skills Training: The chronically unemployed often lack the most basic skills in seeking a job. Those skills include filling out a job application, how to interview, work ethics, attitude, and elementary reading, writing and math skills. • Criminal Records: Job seekers sometimes can not pass criminal record check; often for crimes committed in their youth. Expungement may be available but is sometimes difficult and expensive to obtain. • Entrepreneurship Training: Indian River Community College has held one course in "Entrepreneurship Training" that was attended by 12 people; another is planned. • Housing: Many agricultural workers live in subsidized housing based on their earnings. An increase in earnings will jeopardize their housing opportunities. The majority of housing is H.U.D. housing. There is a need for private home owner occupied housing opportunities. • Public Safety: Removal of the C.O.P.E. building has contributed to an increase in criminal activity. r ATTACHMENT 1 77 • 6 RECOMMENDATIONS SHORT TERM ( b months) • Develop a structure to pursue future grants that would target the county's chronically unemployed and underemployed. • County officials should identify and talk to absentee owners of abandoned, distressed properties; burn down remainder of crack houses and police known drug sales areas. • Enforce all County codes, ordinances and laws consistently with other parts of the county. • Identify the agencies and organizations that can provide the help being suggested in this report. • Create better communications avenues for people to register for needed training classes. • Develop formal plan to address addiction problems within the minority community. • Create a list of all available industrial/commercial properties. • Recommend further review of criminal record issues with law enforcement, the courts and employers. • Document and promote success stories. • Organize 2" Project H.O.P.E. to reach target job seekers in the minority communities. Possible tie-in to a"Gifford Business Day." Identify ways to bring together target job seekers with employers. • Designate beautification funds for the 45� Street corridor. MID TERM (I year) • Black Minority Business Funds are now pooled with Palm Beach County. Recommend the County Commission request a separate reporting of these monies to help local minority businesses to gain access to these funds. • Investigate recently developed Federal program for rural communities • install street lighting and sidewalks, and ensure the quality of public services is consistent with other parts of the county. • Adapt the current public transportation service to known job sites and related service providers in the county and identify other transportation options to and from work. • Create ways to communicate career opportunities to college graduates who have left Indian River County; publicize area websites that provide information needed to the 79 7 community at large. • Provide basic life skills training in the local community. • Create a list of companies that offer on-the-job training. • Create ways to encourage companies to locate in Gifford. LONG TERM (18 months to 2 years) • Research how to get a good representation of chronically unemployed and underemployed, how many need training, what training is needed and available, and the number and type of positions available for job seekers. • Group the skills sets of the county's 20 most in-demand jobs identified by the Workforce Development Board into "steps" that range from: 1)the most basic(life skills), to 2) gradually more complex requirements (step two-aptitude; step three-basic math, etc_). • Explore the future possibility of an enterprise zone in the Gifford.. • Provide agency services on location in the community and to all areas of county where target job seekers live. • Determine available and future needed vocational training; provide access to that training for target job seekers. 79 Gifford Neighborhood Plan INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 Attachment 2 (copy at the BCC office) ford Nei hborhood Plan Plan NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PLAN The neighborhood action plan component of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan identifies the plan goal, strategies to achieve the goal, and actions to be taken to implement the plan. As structured, the plan is results oriented,with specific actions programmed for implementation. Gifford Neighborhood Plan Goal The goal of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan is to revitalize the Gifford area and create a safe community with good quality housing, adequate physical infrastructure,well maintained neighborhoods, and vibrant commercial activity areas. Gifford Neighborhood Plan Strategies For each major issue identified in the Analysis Section of this plan, an overall strategy has been developed. Each strategy provides a blueprint for addressing the issue and solving any problems. Associated with each strategy are objectives and actions. While the strategies establish the general framework for addressing each issue, objectives associated with each strategy set reasonable accomplishments to be met by specified times. Related to each objective are actions'to be undertaken by appropriate parties. Those actions,when undertaken, should lead to accomplishment of the objectives. Because the Gifford Neighborhood Plan is a coordinated effort among a number of groups, there are several agencies/organizations with responsibility for taking actions identified in the plan. Only through the coordinated efforts of these agencies/organizations can the plan's objectives be met. HOUSING Housing Strategy: One of the most significant and most visible problems in Gifford is inadequate housing. To address this issue, the county, the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, Gifford residents, non-profit groups, and private sector interests will need to rehabilitate substandard units, remove dilapidated units, and build new housing. In this effort, the county's role will be to provide state and local funds for housing rehabilitation and new construction, to undertake housing rehabilitation with federal funds, to remove dilapidated housing with local funds, and to assist in establishing viable neighborhood associations to promote property maintenance and ether objectives. Non-profit organizations, w. Community Development Department Indian River County 60 ATTACHMEMAN RT 3 j l;j f4eord Nei hborhood Plan Plan such as Habitat for Humanity, will need to continue building new homes in Gifford and providing pre and post construction mentoring to their clients. In this effort, community groups, particularly the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, have a vital role. These groups must inform Gifford residents of the various local and state programs available for housing ownership and/or rehabilitation, and they must encourage residents to participate in these programs. Objective 1. Housing Rehabilitation By 2005, 60 substandard residential units will have been rehabilitated. Action 1.1 —In 2002,the county will apply for Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) funds to rehabilitate 30-40 substandard housing units in the Gifford area. Action 1.2—The county will commit up to$350,000 of FY 2002-03 and FY 2003-04 SHIP funds to match the CDBG money. Action 1.3—The county will prepare a SHIP program informational package that provides information regarding county's rehabilitation assistance program. Action 1.4—The county will give SHIP rehabilitation program priority to Gifford residents. Action 1.5 - The Progressive Civic League of Gifford will distribute SHIP rehabilitation program information to Gifford residents at public meetings, churches,and civic events. Action 1.6—The county will assist Gifford residents in forming neighborhood associations to promote property maintenance and neighborhood cooperation. Obiective 2. Housing Demolition By 2005, 10 dilapidated residential units will have been demolished. Action 2.1 —The county shall use CDBG funds to demolish and replace at least 5 dilapidated housing units in the Gifford area. Action 2.2—The county will identify and raze at least 2 unsafe structures per year. Community Development Department Indian River County 61 DO ATTACHMENT 3 v .- r"Iford Nei hborhood Plan 1 Plan Objective 3. Housing Ownership By 2005, number of owner occupied housing units in Gifford will have been increased by 150 units. Action 3.I —The county will commit up to $400,000 of SHIP funds per fiscal year for fiscal years 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05 to Habitat for Humanity (HFI-1)program clients in the Gifford area for downpayment/closing cost, impact fee, and land acquisition loan assistance. Action 3.2—The county will prepare SHIP program informational packages that provide information regarding the county's downpayment/closing cost loan assistance program. Action 3.3 -The Progressive Civic League of Gifford will distribute SHIP downpayment/closing cost program information to Gifford residents at public meetings, churches, and civic events. Action 3.4—Local financial institutions will host housing fairs in Gifford to inform Gifford residents of available housing loans, to provide housing related information, and to provide contact person information. Action 3.5 -The county will initiate rezoning action when and where appropriate, to change RM-10 zoning to RS-6 zoning. TOWN CENTER/NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY CENTER Commercial Activity Center Strategy: An important component of a successful community is a town center/commercial activity center. This is a location where residents can obtain retail and convenience goods and personal services. While Gifford does not have an existing town center/neighborhood commercial activity center, there are several areas along 45th Street and 43rd Street where retail type uses currently exist. Using those facilities as a base, a town center/commercial activity center will be established in the area along 4.5th Street from 38th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway, along 43rd Street from 28th Avenue to Old Dixie Highway and the area along 25th Avenue and the F.E.C. Railroad between 45th Street and 43rd Street. To create the activity center, the county will make necessary land use plan and zoning changes as well as necessary changes to the County's Land Development Regulations (LDRs). The county will also make streetscape improvements along 45th Street and 43rd Street in order to create a pleasant shopping environment, enhance pedestrian access, and provide on street parking. This effort will require coordinated action involving the county (land use and zoning changes, LDR changes, capital improvements, design standards), the Community Development Department Indian River County 62 DO ATTACHMENT r._�Ord Neighborhood Plan Plan Progressive Civic League of Gifford (community support), and the Chamber of Commerce (entrepreneurship programs). Objective 4. Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center By 2010, Gifford will have a vital town center/commercial activity center where local residents can obtain various goods and services. Action 4.1 — The county will designate 45th Street between Old Dixie Highway and 38th Avenue, 43`d Street between Old Dixie Highway and 28`h Avenue, and the area along 25th Avenue and the F.E.C. Railroad between 45`h Street and 43`d Street as the Gifford Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center(GNCAC). Action 4.2 — Indian River County will initiate a land use amendment and rezoning to change up to 15 acres from residential to Commercial for appropriate properties within the designated Gifford Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center area. Action 4.3 — The county will amend its Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to include special regulations for the Gifford Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center. These regulations will address the appearance of new commercial and office buildings, and the allowance for mixed use development. The regulations will also address the type of uses allowed, and various design elements, including siting buildings close to the street, locating parking lots behind buildings, and regulating the size, Iocation, and type of signs. Action 4.4—The county will construct sidewalk and street improvements along 45th Street and 43`d Street. Action 4.5 —The county will resurface 45th Street. Action 4.6—The county will build on-street parking spaces along 43`d Street and 45th Street. Action 4.7—The county will apply for funds to construct the streetscape improvements. Funding sources may include CDBG grants, enhancement funds, and other programs. Action 4.8 - The county will work with owners of existing businesses in the area to obtain funds for property renovation and expansion. Community Development Department Indian River County 63 :0 ATTACHMENT 3 ford Neighborhood Plan Plan ILLEGAL AND NON-CONFORMING USES Elimination of Non-Conforming Uses Strategy: To maintain the integrity of a community, illegal land uses and non- conforming land uses must be identified and eliminated. In Gifford, illegal rooming houses and bars disrupt neighborhoods, reduce property values, and inhibit investment. It is important not only to remove these uses, but also to prevent their re-establishment. To eliminate illegal uses and non-conformities, the county will use its regulatory authority. This will involve multi-agency sweeps, code enforcement action, and coordination with local community groups and organizations. Objective 5. Elimination of Illegal Uses By 2008, all illegal and non-conforming uses in Gifford will have been eliminated. Action 5.1 — The county code enforcement section will work with the Sheriff's Office, the Building Division, the Fire Division, and the Health Department to conduct regular sweeps of suspected illegal uses in Gifford. Action 5.2—The county code enforcement section will initiate enforcement action against any identified illegal uses. Action 5.3 — The county code enforcement section will regularly monitor properties against which code enforcement action has been taken. INFRASTRUCTURE Infrastructure Strategy: Adequate infrastructure is important for every community. In Gifford, most of the streets were paved, and water and sewer lines were installed in the early 80's. Street lighting and sidewalks exist along major roads. Drainage problems occur in some areas. Throughout Gifford, the most important need is the maintenance of existing facilities. There is also a need to construct additional infrastructure in some areas. Most important is road resurfacing, water and sewer line maintenance, drainage enhancements, sidewalk construction, and street light installation. In most cases, the county is responsible for these activities. Some activities such as road resurfacing are undertaken on a regular basis according to a countywide schedule. Other activities such as on-going drainage work are w Community Development Department Indian River County 64 00 ATTACHMENT ENT M C4_. C.. _ ord Nei hborhood Plan Plan special projects. Besides conducting maintenance activities, the county will provide various infrastructure enhancements. This will include streetscape improvements and sidewalk enhancements. Objective 6. Provision of Sidewalks and Streetscape Improvements By 2005,there will be continuous sidewalks along 415`Street from 58`h Avenue to U.S. #1; along 45th Street from 43rd Avenue to U.S. #1; and along 43rd Avenue between 41St Street and 49th Street Action 6.1 —The county Public Works Department will construct sidewalks along 415`Street as part of 41"Street resurfacing project. Action 6.2 — The county Public Works Department will repair and connect the sidewalk along 43rd Avenue between 41St Street and 49th Street Action 6.3 - The county Public Works Department will repair and connect the sidewalk along 45`h Street, from 43rd Avenue to U.S. #1. Obiective 7. Street Maintenance By 2005, all streets in Gifford will be adequately maintained. Adequate maintenance is defined as a ranking of 3 or above on the Road and Bridge Roadway Maintenance Condition Inventory. Action 7.1 — The county Road and Bridge Division will, on an annual basis, monitor street conditions in Gifford, rank projects for resurfacing and/or repair, and undertake high rank projects. A copy of this report will be provided to the Gifford Progressive Civic League. Action 7.2 - The Road and Bridge Division will repair or resurface any street with a ranking below 3. Action 7.3 — The county Public Works Department will widen and resurface 415` Street, providing sidewalks, turn lanes and other related improvements. Action 7.4—The county Public Works Department will resurface 45`h Street Community Development Department Indian River County 65 ,o ATTACHMENT (--.Zord Nei hborhood Plan Plan Objective 8. Street Imnrovements By 2010, all publicly owned roads in Gifford with adequate right-of-way will be paved. Action 8.1 —The Progressive Civic League of Gifford will coordinate with property owners along 28th Court, 28 Avenue, and 30th Avenue between 45th Street and 49th Street to obtain right-of-way donations for those roads. Action 8.2 - The county Public Works Department shall pave 28th Court, 28th Avenue, and 30th Avenue from 45th Street to 49th Street when all needed right-of-ways are donated to the county. Objective 9. Street and Intersection Safety By 2010, crash rates within Gifford will not exceed the countywide average. Action 9.1 - The county Traffic Engineering Division shall on an annual basis monitor traffic volumes and crash rates of all major intersections, including intersections in Gifford. When warrants are met, intersections will be signalized. The county shall submit a copy of this report to the Progressive Civic League of Gifford. Action 9.2 - The county shall make improvements to the 41St Street/43`d Avenue intersection; the 41St Street/58 h Avenue intersection; the 41St Street/Old Dixie Highway intersection; the 45"' Street/Old Dixie Highway intersection; and the 49th Street/U.S. #1 intersection. Action 9.3 - The Metropolitan Planning Organization will, by 2003, complete a truck routing plan that will identify appropriate truck routes throughout the county,including Gifford. Objective 10. Drainage Improvements By 2005, there will not be any flooding problems in Gifford for a 10 year/24 hour storm event. Action 10.1 — The county Public Works Department will initiate and complete the stormwater management improvements Programmed for the portion of east Gifford which is not part of the Indian River Farms Water Control District(IRFWCD). Action 10.2—The Indian River Farms Water Control District(IRFWCD) will continue to maintain its canals within Gifford. Community Development Department Indihn River County 66 -4 ATTACHMENT 3 _..ford Neighborhood Plan Plan Action 10.3 —The Progressive Civic League of Gifford will encourage Gifford residents to monitor all areas of Gifford and report any dumping of grass clippings or other debris into stormwater management facilities. Action 10.4 — The Progressive Civic League of Gifford will encourage residents to notify the county and IRFWMD if they notice clogged culverts or slow moving water in ditches. Obiective 11. Street Lighting By 2010, Gifford will have 20 percent more streetlights than presently exist. Action 11.1 — The county's Public Works Department will meet with the Progressive Civic League of Gifford and with Gifford residents and develop a plan for street lighting in Gifford,the cost of which will be paid through the Gifford street lighting district. Action 11.2—The Public Works Department will install street lights on 29h Avenue, 30t'Avenue and 49`h Street in Gifford. Objective 12. Park Improvements By 2010, Gifford Park and Hosie Schumann Park will be enhanced. Action 12.1 - The Public Works Department will construct parking spaces, restrooms, benches, picnic areas, a children's playground, and basketball courts for the Hosie-Schumann Park. Action 12.2 -The Public Works Department will construct a stormwater management facility at the southwest corner of Gifford Park. Action 12.3 - The Public Works Department will construct a security unit at Gifford Park. CRIME Crime Strategy: Compared to other areas in the county, Gifford has a high volume of crime and a high crime rate. Reducing that rate is an important component in achieving the overall plan goal. Like most issue areas, crime reduction requires coordinated action by various groups and agencies. While many of the physical improvement strategies reflected in this plan, including code enforcement and housing rehabilitation activities, may affect (reduce) the crime rate, there is still a need for r r. L Community Development Department Indian River County 67 )o ATTACHIMENT 3 )o ford Nei hborhood Plan Plan concentrated crime-fighting action. That involves the Sheriffs Office maintaining its current level of resource commitment to the Gifford area. It also involves the county continuing its code enforcement activities and residents cooperating with law and code enforcement agencies. Obiective 13. Crime-and Law Enforcement By 2005,the crime rate in Gifford will be ten percent lower than the 2000 level. Action 13.1 —The Sheriffs Office will maintain its current level of resource allocation in Gifford. Action 13.2—The county will focus code enforcement activities on sites which contribute to the crime rate. Action 13.3 - The Sheriff s office will enforce all posted speed limits. EMPLOYMENT Emuloyment Strategy: One of the most significant issues facing Gifford is unemployment and under-employment. Because unemployment is a major cause of crime, poverty, poor housing conditions, and other problems, unemployment is an issue whose resolution can significantly improve community conditions. Currently, Gifford and the areas adjacent to Gifford have one of the highest concentrations of jobs in the county. To solve the unemployment problem in Gifford, more jobs need to be created, and Gifford residents must be better trained to qualify for those jobs. This will require action by the county and Chamber of Commerce to create jobs, and action by various groups to provide job training. Obiective 14. Employment By 2010, Gifford's unemployment rate will be 15 percent lower than 2000 levels. Action 14.1 - The county will promote industrial park development in the Gifford area. Action 14.2 - The City of Vero Beach will continue to promote industrial development on Airport property. a J, Community Development Department Indian River County 68 00 ATTACHMENT 3 L f7lxord Nei hborhood Plan Plan Action 143 -The Chamber of Commerce will continue to attract industries to Gifford Action 14.4 - The county and Chamber of Commerce will provide technical assistance to Gifford residents to encourage them to open businesses in the proposed neighborhood commercial activity center. Action 14.5 -The School Board will establish a vocational school in Gifford. Action 14.6 - Giving Rewarding Opportunities to Work(GROW)and other non-profits will continue their job training activities. Community Development Department Indian River County 69 ATTACHMENT 3 GIFFORD NEIGI- ORHOOD PLAN IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX Action Type of Action Responsibility Timing from Capital Status(April Year Comments the GNP Expenditure 2013) Completed Objective 1 — Housing Rehabilitation 1.1 Apply for CDBG Grant Planning 2002 No Done 2001 for Rehabilitating Substandard Housing Units 1.2 Commitment of Funds for Planning FY 2002-2003 Yes Done 2001 and then Housing Rehabilitation FY 2003-2004 Ongoing 1.3 Preparing Information Planning 2002 No Done 2002 Package 1.4 Establish SHIP Rehab. Planning Ongoing No Done 2002 Funding Priority for Gifford 1.5 Distribution of Progressive Civic Ongoing No Done Ongoing Information League of Gifford (PCLG) 1.6 Forming Neighborhood Planning/Residents/PC Ongoing No Not Done ----- No interest from residents Associations LG Objective 2 — Housing Demolition 2.1 Replace Dilapidated Planning 2003-2004 Yes Done 2002-2004 Housing Units 2.2 Demolishing Unsafe Planning Ongoing Yes Done Ongoing Structures Objective 3 — Housing Ownershi 3.1 Commitment of Funds for Planning Ongoing Yes Done Ongoing New Housing Construction 3.2 Preparation of Planning Ongoing No Done 2002-ongoing Informational Package 3.3 Distribution of Progressive Civic On,oing 4or Done ' ' - Ongoing E; :� ATTACHMENT �� Action Ti J Action Responsibility Timing from Cap Status(April Year Comments 94 the GNP Ex enuiture 2013) Completed Information League of Gifford 3.4 Conducting Housing Local Financial Ongoing No Done Several times Fairs in Gifford Institutions/Others 3.5 Rezoning Planning By 2006 No Not done ----- Taking issue (down zoning) Objective 4 — Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center 4.1 Designation of Planning By 2002 No Not done These actions were initiated Neighborhood by staff in 2003, Despite Commercial Activity support from community Center leaders and the community 4.2 Initiate a Land Use Planning By 2003 No Not done at large,these initiatives Amendment and were not supported by the Rezoning affected property owners 4.3 Amendment of the LDRs Planning2002-2003 No Not done and some of the nearby residents. For that reason, those actions were not undertaken. 4.4 Construction of Public Works 2004-2005 Yes Not done ---- Insufficient right-of-way Sidewalks Along 45" Street and 43`d Street 4.5 Resurfacing 45th Street Public Works 2004-2005 Yes Done 2011 4.6 Building On-Street Public Works 2004-2005 Yes Not done ---- County allocated$200,000 Parking for this action. That money 4.7 Streetscape Public Works 2004-2005 Yes Not done' ---- was used for streetscape Improvementsimprovements(curbing)-on -� < .... 45 Street west of 43rd M11 .. Avenue. s��nother Sal?0;000' 3 was then put in the budget for this project. Recenti}, the county proposed using } Brownfield grant funds to design streetscape improvements on 15"Street, but the funding agency indicated that that was not an eligible expense. Currently, $200,000 is in the. ..., budget far thisro'ect. 4.8 Coordination with Plannin Ongoing No + Not done ===- Area did not quali for ATTACHMFNT Ri 4i Action T AAction Responsibility Timing from Cap, Status(April Year Comments the GNP Ex enaiture 2013) Completed Existing Businesses to '.t bBG commercial obtain funds for revitalization funding renovation Objective 5 — Elimination of Illegal Uses 5.1 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement/ Ongoing No Done Ongoing Sweeps Sheriff's Office 5.2 Code Enforcement Action Code Enforcement Ongoing No Done Ongoing 5.3 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Ongoing No Done Ongoing Monitoring Objective 6 — Provision of Sidewalks and Streetsca a Im rovements 6.1 Construction of Public Works 2003 Yes Partially done 2006 Sidewalks along 41St (from 43`d Street Avenue to 58`h Avenue 6.2 Repair of Sidewalk along Public Works 2004-2005 Yes Done 2007 43`d Avenue 6.3 Repair Sidewalks along Public Works 2004-2005 Yes Done 2007 45` Street Objective 7— Street Maintenance 7.1 Monitoring Street Road and Bridge Ongoing No Done Ongoing Conditions 7.2 Repair or Resurface Road and Bridge Ongoing Yes Done Ongoing Roads 7.3 Resurfacing 41 S`Street Public Works 2003 Yes Done 2006 7.4 Resurfacing 45h Street Public Works 2004-2005 Yes Done 2011 Objective 8 — Street Im rovements 8.1 Donation of R-O-W Progressive Civic By 2005 No Done Ongoing League and Property Owners 8.2 Paving 281Court,281Public Works By 2010 Yes Done 2006 Avenue and 30`h Avenue Objective 9 — Street and Intersection Safety 9.1 Monitoring Traffic Traffic Engineering Ongoing No Done Ongoing Volumes and Accident Rates 9.2 Intersection Public Works 2003-2005 Yes f' Improvements to: g ATTACHMFNT j A A eAAW Action T,. of Action Responsibility Timing from Cap. Status(April Year Comments the GNP Ex enditure 2013) Completed 41St St/43` Ave Done 2006 4151 St/Old Dixie Hwy Not Done 4151 St/581h Ave Done 2006 451h St/Old Dixie Hwy Done Four way stop sign 491h St/U.S.#I Not Done 9.3 Truck Routing Plan MPO By 2003 No Done 2003 rtive 10 — Draina a Im rovements Stormwater Public Works 2002-2003 Yes Done 2005 Im rovements On oinMaintainin Canals IRFWCD On oing NoDone Ongoing Monitoring Stormwater Progressive Civic Ongoing No Done Ongoing Facilities League of Gifford/ Residents 10.4 Monitoring Stormwater Progressive Civic Ongoing No Done Ongoing Facilities League of Gifford/ Residents Objective 11- Street Li htin 11.1 Street Lighting Public Works/PCLG 2002-2003 No Done Ongoing 11.2 Installing Street Lights Public Works 2003-2006 Yes Done 2003 -2011 Along 291h Avenue,30th Avenue and 491h Street Objective 12 — Park Im rovements 12.1 Park Improvements to Public Works By 2010 Yes Not d`anei ---- T aek offending Hosie-Schumann Park 12.2 Drainage Improvement to Public Works By 2005 Yes Done 2007 Gifford Park 2008 12.3 Construction of a Public Works By 2010 Yes Done Security Unit Objective 13 — Crime and Law Enforcement 13.1 Resource Allocation Sheriffs Office Ongoing No Done Ongoing 13.2 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Ongoing No Done Ongoing Actions 13.3 Enforcement of Posted Sheriff's Office Ongoing No Done Ongoing Speed Limits Objective 14 - Employment 14.1 Industrial Park Private Developers Ongoing Yes(private) Done 2007 The 12:5 acre "Indian River Development Industu rial Center was :� ATTACHMFNT 4 L Awa Action 1 of Action Responsibility Timing from Ca %o Status(April Year Comments the GNP Expenditure 2013) Completed developed on 4151 Street. 14.2 Airport Industrial Park Vero Beach/Private Ongoing Yes(private) Done Ongoing Expansion Developers 14.3 Attracting Business to Chamber of Commerce Ongoing No Done Ongoing Gifford 14.4 Technical Assistance County/Chamber of Ongoing No Done Ongoing Commerce 14.5 Vocational Training School Board Ongoing No Done Ongoing 14.6 Vocational Training GROW Ongoing No Done Ongoing F:\Community Development\Gifford Plan\gifford plan implementation matrix.doc iRmNl Li./LTI - . MI N INDIAN RIVER COUN'T'Y, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Arthur Harris, President, Progressive Civic League of Gifford FROM: Gale Carmoney; Senior Planner, Long Range Planning DATE: September 30, 2003 RE: Response to Rezoning Related Questions raised at the September 10, 2003 Gifford Community Meeting On September 10,2003,a community meeting was held at the Gifford Community Center to discuss the proposal to rezone some properties located in Gifford. The intent of this proposal was to provide for the creation of a Town Center/Gifford Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center(GNCAC)as outlined in the Gifford Neighborhood Plan. Below please find responses to questions raised by residents at the September 10th meeting. • What effect will the proposed commercial rezoning have on property taxes? Staff at the Property Appraiser's office confirmed that this rezoning would have no effect on those residential properties which have homestead exemption.Vacant and rental properties(which do not have homestead exemption) may or may not see a change in value. Changes would be based on market values in the area. Properties are appraised at"Market Value".If the market value increases or decreases, the assessed values will follow. • Will homeowners be able to rebuild their residential structures if a catastrophic event (fire, hurricane, tornado)were to occur? Yes-Detached single-family homes are a permitted use under the special regulations prepared for the GNCAC.Homes would be allowed to be rebuilt at their existing location if damage is less than 50% of the assessed value. cases where the damage is more than 50% of the assessed value, the GNCAC setback and buitaing requirements would apply.The GNCAC setback requirements are less restrictive than the normal RM-10 setbacks.If any home is destroyed or damaged beyond 50%of its assessed value and damage occurred within a state or federally declared disaster area,then the home may be rebuilt in its original location. 1 ATTANMENT 5 _. �_.. 96 • Is there room for all the new street improvements to be placed in the existing right-of- ways for 24`h Avenue, 25'h Avenue, 43`d Street, and 45t' Street? No-According to Public Works Director,Jim Davis,the existing right-of-ways of 50 feet for 24" Avenue,25d Avenue and 43rd Street need to be expanded to 64 feet(an additional 7 feet on each side)for the improvements planned in the Gifford Neighborhood Plan and the streetscape design for the GNCAC. The additional 7 feet from each side of the street is more than offset by the proposed reduction in the front yard setback from 25 feet to 11 feet,which is equivalent to a 14 foot setback reduction. At this time 24`h Avenue is an unimproved right-of way. There may be sufficient right-of-way for 45'h Street. The ultimate right-of-way needed will be dependent upon the design of the road way and type of improvements considered for the road. • What other plans does the county have for this area? None-There is no other plan than the approved Gifford Neighborhood Plan.Staff will work with the Gifford community to implement the actions outlined in the Gifford Neighborhood Plan. • Will the proposed rezoning force out the elderly that live there now? No — The rezoning will not change anything for existing residential units. The Gifford Neighborhood Plan and the proposed Commercial Activity Center were not created to force out any of the residents in the area. The purpose of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan is to assist in _ revitalizing the community and making it easier for residents to obtain necessary goods and services locally, in Gifford. • Who will benefit from this proposed rezoning? The Gifford Community - The intent of the proposed GNCAC is to allow more economic development,thereby creating more jobs and providing goods and services for local residents. • Will the proposed rezoning eliminate eligibility for other government programs? No — Homeowners and commercial business owners will still be able to apply for state and federal grants to rehabilitate or develop their properties. • Will the rezoning negatively affect existing businesses? No-The purpose for creating the Gifford Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center is to allow for the development of more local businesses that complement and support existing businesses. As proposed the GNCAC will be a«walkable, livable.mixed use area that will enhance both new and existing businesses. 2 ATTACHMENT 97 • Is there a better place for the GNCAC? The proposed area was identified by the Gifford community through several meetings related to the development of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan. However, planning staff will consider proposals from the Progressive Civic League of Gifford for other sites in the Gifford area as long as the proposal has the support of the property owners and surrounding property owners. cc: Commissioner Arthur R.Neuberger, Indian River County, District 2 Bob Keating, Community Development Director Stan Boling, Planning Director Sasan Rohani, Long Range Section Chief Jim Davis, Public Works Director Freddie Woolfork, Gifford Front Porch, Chairman FACommunity Development\Users\LONG RANGE\CompPlan\Small Scale Amendments\Gifford NCAC\notes,etc\Response to Gifford LDDC ® Y 3 � ; � EN �' 98 Gifford Neighborhood Plan Evaluation Board of County Commissioners May 21, 2013 Background fv Workforce Enhancement Task Force report to BCC on August 8, 2000 to BCC directed staff to prepare Gifford Neighborhood Plan (GNP) io Worked with the Progressive Civic League of Gifford and the Gifford community to prepare the GNP Gifford town hall community meeting on August 261 2002 -- plan endorsed to BCC approved the plan on September 17, 2002 92-A- 1 Preparing the Plan Collect Data it Determine Existing Conditions It It V Identify Issues Identify Identify Opportunities Constraints # It Determine Solutions; Set Goals, Objectives, and Actions Establish Implementation Activities Public Involvement to Progressive Civic League of Gifford v Workforce Enhancement Taskforce Gifford interested Residents Several small and large Community Meetings q8- A- 2 Project Boundaries 49th Street I � I � I s ree Plan Actions Contains 54 actions to 43 (80%) of the plan's 54 actions fully implemented io 2 (4%) of the actions partially implemented to 9 (17%)of the actions not implemented Those 9 really 6 (4.1, 4.2 4.3 related & 4.6, 4.7 related) q2-A- 3 Actions not implemented Action 1.6: states that "the county will assist Gifford residents in forming neighborhood associations to promote property maintenance and neighborhood conditions" Implementation Status: so no interest by the community in forming neighborhood associations. Action 3.5: states that "the county will institute rezoning action, when and where appropriate, to change RM-10 zoning to RS-6 zoning. Implementation Status: r down zoning taking (under the Bert Harris property rights law) unless there is a willing property owner. No property owners willing to accept a down- zoning q?-A- 4 Actions 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3: are related to creating a Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center (NCAC) for Gifford because: io No major shopping center in Gifford io Residents need to go to other areas for shopping, including grocery shopping. io More expensive to purchase items from local convenience stores Implementation Status: In 2003, rezoning actions initiated to create a Gifford NCAC. io Some nearby residents objected to creating a NCAC Due to property owner objections, county, with concurrence of Progressive Civic League of Gifford, stopped all actions to establish the Neighborhood Commercial Activity Center for Gifford. Action 4.4: states that the county will construct sidewalks and street improvements along 45th Street and 43rd Street Implementation Status: io insufficient right-of-way Could not install sidewalks with recent resurfacing of 45th Street west of 43rd Avenue because of right-of-way constraints. Actions 4.6 and 4.7: relates to building on street parking spaces and making streetscape improvements along 45th Street and 43rd Street. Implementation Status: io $200,000.00 allocated for that action. %o Money used for streetscape improvements (curbing) on 45th Street west of 43rd Avenue. io Attempted to use Brownfield grant funds to design streetscape improvements, but not an eligible expense. io Currently, $200,000.00 in the budget, and staff expects to proceed with the project in the future. �'B-A- 6 Action 4.8: states that "the county will work with owners of existing business in the area to obtain funds for property renovation and expansion". Implementation Status: Subject area does not qualify for CDBG commercial revitalization funding. Action 12.1: states that the public works department will construct parking spaces, restrooms, benches, picnic areas, a children's playground, and basketball courts for the Hosie-Schumann Park. Implementation Status: qo lack of funding. Q 9- A- 7 PLAN UPDATE Updating the plan will require coordinating with interested residents, community organizations, and appropriate county departments. Need to identify community's current: v concerns issues opportunities to constraints Steps for updating GNP %o Update data section with the most recent available information u Update analysis section based on the new data and input from Gifford residents Identify the community's current issues and concerns io Identify opportunities and constraints in the Gifford area io Draft new objectives and actions to address residents' concerns, issues and opportunities. Submit the updated plan for BCC consideration q g-►�' 8 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board direct staff to coordinate with the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, interested residents, and other interested organizations to update the Gifford Neighborhood Plan. 92-A- 9 13& Attorney's Matters-B.C.C. 05.21.13 Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorne DATE: May 15,2013 SUBJECT: Appointment of County Attorney BACKGROUND. As the Board knows, the current County Attorney has submitted his resignation, effective at a mutually convenient date this summer. A search has been underway since early March to find a replacement. On May 7, the Board selected a "short list" of applicants for interviews, which (as of the date of preparation of this agenda memo) are scheduled to be conducted between May 7 and May 20. Under the plan adopted by the Board in March, final selection is to be made on May 21. Thus, assuming the process has been completed to the satisfaction of the Board, and there are no unresolved issues remaining, it is appropriate for the Board to make a final selection. Due diligence has been completed on each applicant on the"short list." RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney recommends that the Board discuss the applicants and make a final decision selecting the new County Attorney. Indian River Co. A,aproved Date APPROVED FOR MAY 21, 2013 Admin. UQS B.C C. MEETING—A 1TORNEY'S MATTERS Co.Atty. Budget 5 r Dept. Risk Mgr. COUNTYATTORNEY ASP:LAC F.Ati gVindalGEAIFR9LOCC19genda Ai~sICAO(CA Hlrtng Process)01doc 99 MAY 211 2013 ITEM 14.A.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS + INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: May 15, 2013 SUBJECT: Member at Large Appointee for the Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Joseph E. Flescher Commissioner, District 2 The Board of County Commission received the resignation of Mr. George Hamner from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Hamner served as a Member-at-Large with his term expiring in January, 2015. The announcement of Mr. Hamner's resignation and the opening of a Member-at-Large position on the Planning and Zoning Commission was published under Informational Items on the Board of County Commission Agenda of May 7, 2013. The following individuals have submitted applications (Applications and Resumes are on file in the Commission Office) and meet the requirements to serve on the Planning and Zoning Commission as a Member-at-Large: • Larry Hall • Glenda Swanson Massa • Jordan Stewart • Nicholas Rains Board action is required to appoint a replacement to the Planning and Zoning Commission to serve as a Member-at-Large with a term to expire in January, 2015. IL JEF,Iv 100 May 21, 2013 ITEM14A.2 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners Date: May 15, 2013 Subject: Impact Fees From: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Commissioner, District 2 I would like to initiate an open conversation on the current need for Impact Fees. JEF;ly. 101 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY _� c0� K SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT �za BOARD MEMORANDUM }=�! ORIS Date: May 13, 2013 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Thru: Vincent Burke, Director of Utility Services From: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District m ' Subject: Fifth Amendment to SWDD Feedstock Supply Agreement with INPB BACKGROUND: On July 15, 2011, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) approved the Feedstock Supply Agreement (FSA) to INEOS New Planet BioEnergy, LLC (INPB), which was subsequently amended by the First Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement, dated March 13, 2012; by the Second Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement Concerning Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement of Section 7.4, dated April 25, 2012; by the Third Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement, dated November 13, 2012 and by the Fourth Amendment to 'eedstock Supply Agreement, dated March 19, 2013. The First Amendment provided a one year license to use SWDD's Vegetative Waste Management Area and scale house with provisions for INPB to pay a Scale Fee of$3.00 for each out of county vehicle for the first nine months and a fee of$3.00 for each vehicle after nine months. The Third Amendment provided an extension to use SWDD's facilities until April 30, 2013 and for INPB to pay a Scale Fee of $3.00 for each out of county vehicle until March 31, 2013 and a fee of$3.00 for each vehicle after March 31, 2013. The Fourth Amendment provided an extension to use SWDD's facilities until May 31, 2013 and for INPB to pay a Scale Fee of$3.00 for each out of county vehicle until April 30, 2013 and a fee of$3.00 for each vehicle after April 30, 2013. The overall intent of these amendments has been to provide an opportunity for INPB to transition the processing to their facility. On May 7, 2013, INPB officially notified SWDD that as of May 13, 2013, all vegetative waste will be received and processed at their facility utilizing an entrance from Oslo Road. Both SWDD and INPB staff have worked cooperatively to ensure that there is a seamless transition for our residents whereby maintaining the same rates and level of service. INPB expects to process the material received at SWDD's facility prior to the transition by May 31, 2013 deadline. However, INPB requested via email on May 8, 2013 an extension of the temporary license to occupy and use the SWDD's Vegetative Waste Management Area for storage of various stages of vegetative materials and wood chips through August 31, 2013. ANALYSIS: Based on mutual agreement of both parties, staff recommends approval of an extension to INPB to continue o utilize our facility for storage purposes only. The attached amendment provides an extension of the license through August 31, 2013. SWDD Agenda-Fifth Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement with INPB Page 1 102 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the SWDD Board approve and authorize the Chairman to sign the Fifth Amendment to the Feedstock Supply Agreement. ATTACHMENT: Fifth Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement& email from INPB APPROVED FOR AGENDA: By: _Oca-'410�. ��' &� - Indian River Co. Approved Date Jose h A. Baird, County Administrator (2-7-57/0/-3 Administration F r: I �d/3 Budget 5 �rj 13 Dateo Legal AWY SWDD SWDD SWDD Agenda-Fifth Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement with INPB Page 2 103 Himanshu Mehta From: Eric Porr[eric.porr@ineos.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 3:23 PM To: Himanshu Mehta Cc: David King; Lisa Evans Subject: Extension of Districts Vegetative Waste Management Area for storage Himanshu On behalf of Dave King and IN PB, we would like to request an extension of our current temporary license to occupy and use the Districts Vegetative Waste Management Area for storage of various stages of vegetative materials and wood chips for a period of time ending on August 31, 2013. Please let me know how I or Lisa can assist in getting this extension expedited for approval with the County. Dave indicated to me he will call Joe Baird to give him a heads up on this request. thanks Eric si»i�ni2 104 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO FEEDSTOCK SUPPLY AGREEMENT THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO FEEDSTOCK SUPPLY AGREEMENT ("Fifth Amendment") is entered into as of this _day of May, 2013, by and between the Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District ("District"), a dependant special district of Indian River County, Florida ("District"), and INEOS New Planet BioEnergy, LLC ("INEOS"), a Delaware limited liability company. (Capitalized terms that are used but not defined in this Fifth Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Parties' Feedstock Supply Agreement, the First Amendment, Second Amendment, Third Amendment or the Fourth Amendment, as described below). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on July 15, 2011, the Parties entered into the Feedstock Supply Agreement ("Feedstock Agreement"), which was subsequently amended by the First Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement, dated March 13, 2012 ("First Amendment"), by the Second Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement Concerning Cash Deposit and Escrow Agreement of Section 7.4, dated April 25, 2012 ("Second Amendment"), by the Third Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement, dated November 13, 2012 ("Third Amendment"); and by the Fourth Amendment to Feedstock Supply Agreement, dated March 19, 2013 ("Fourth Amendment'D; and WHEREAS, in section 4 of the First Amendment, the District granted to INEOS a temporary license to occupy and use the District's Vegetative Waste Management Area for a period of time ending, at the latest, on March 13, 2013, which date was extended in the Fourth Amendment to May 31, 2013, and which date the Parties desire to extend in this Fifth Amendment to August 31,2013 for Storage Purposes Only; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and promises stated herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,the District and INEOS agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and incorporated as if fully restated herein. 2. Amendment of Section 4 of the First Amendment. The first sentence of section 4 of the First Amendment is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language: "The District hereby grants a temporary license to INEOS to occupy and use the District's Vegetative management Area for storage of various stages of vegetative materials and wood chips." The third sentence of section 4 of the First Amendment is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language: "The term of this license shall terminate on August 31, 2013,unless the license is terminated sooner as a result of a Parry's failure to comply with the requirements herein." This amendment shall supersede section 2 of the Fourth Amendment. 1 CDocummu mld SetingsVmehmV,acd SemngsTmpormylnrernn FiiesOLK70�dsrock Agmn-Srh Ammdment.dor 105 3. Other Provisions. Except as amended herein and in the First Amendment, Second Amendment, Third Amendment and Fourth Amendment all remaining provisions of the Feedstock Agreement shall remain in full force and effect IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fifth Amendment is executed by the authorized representatives of the Parties, as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE Clerk of Court and Comptroller DISPOSAL DISTRICT("District") By: By: Deputy Clerk Joseph E.Flescher, Chairman Approved by BCC: ,2013. Approved: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: a4&j / )�seph . air , Cobity AdMinistrator Alan S. Pot kwich, Sr., County A orney Signed, sealed and delivered in the INEOS NEW PLANET BIOENERGY, LLC presenc"f: f ("Company") Print name: By: Wl . Print name: WrT Print name: 15'a 92ims Print title: C:IDocvmmtr mid SenugsNmeMalLocal Sevinga�Tempnrory/mernei Files�OlX101FeedstockAgrmr-Sih Lnmdumr.dae 2 106