The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/18/2013AP PROCLAMATION HONORING BRANDON ROBERT MC KAY FOR ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT WHEREAS, the Eagle Scout Award is the highest rank in Scouting and a young man must exemplify the highest ideals of the Boy Scout movement in his daily life to qualify for this rank; and WHEREAS, Brandon is a valued member of Boy Scout Troop 513 where he has held many leadership positions and has served the Scouting Program for many years; earning the six ranks of, Scout, Tenderfoot, Second Class, First Class, Star, Life, in preparation for becoming an Eagle Scout. He earned a minimum of 21 merit badges, in addition to many other requirements which demonstrated his skills, leadership and devotion to the movement; and WHEREAS, Brandon has truly exhibited a commitment to the Scouting principals while participating in other leadership positions such as his Church, Saint Helen's, and many of their activities, most notably the annual Harvest Festival; and served as a very active member and officer of Scouting's Honor Camper Society, the Order of the Arrow, where he attained full Brotherhood Membership status; and WHEREAS, Brandon has faithfully studied and learned the skills of the outdoors on numerous short and long term camping experiences and attended the Centennial National Boy Scout Jamboree in honor of the 100th Anniversary of Scouting at Fort A. P. Hill in Virginia; and WHEREAS, Brandon has expressed his intention to become a United States Marine, upon graduation from high school, so that he may continue to do his duty to God and Country; and WHEREAS, Brandon is a valued member of Boy Scout Troop 513 where he has held many leadership positions and has served in the Scouting Program for many years. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board recognizes the accomplishments of Brandon Robert McKay, and honors him for his achievement. Adopted this 18th day of June, 2013 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA J :eh 9. FI scher, Chairman ' ey S. Davis, Vice W Peter D' O'Bryan Tim Z PROCLAMATION HONORING DANIEL RICHARD SALVADOR FOR ATTAINING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT WHEREAS, the Eagle Scout is the highest rank of recognition offered in Scouting and a young man must exemplify the highest ideals of the Boy Scout movement to qualify for this rank; and WHEREAS, to earn the rank of Eagle Scout, a Boy Scout must advance through five ranks, Tenderfoot, Second Class, First Class, Star, Life and Eagle. A scout must earn 21 merit badges, in addition to many other requirements; and WHEREAS, Daniel is a valued member of Boy Scout Troop 503 where he has held leadership positions as Patrol Leader; Senior Patrol Leader, Quartermaster; Assistant Patrol Leader; and is a member of the Order of the Arrow, Scouting's nationally recognized honor society; and WHEREAS, Daniel has truly exhibited a commitment to the Scouting principals while participating in other leadership positions such as Captain of the VBHS Varsity Swim team awarded MVR his senior year; Member of the VBHS AFJROTC all four years achieving the rank,of Major as well as serving as Missions Support Officer, Logistics Officer and Class Commander; as a member of the VBHS Varsity Track and Field Team; one of two students at VBHS to receive the 2012 Heisman Award for Outstanding Athletics, Academics and Leadership and as a member of the National Honor Society. Daniel was selected to participate in the American Legion Boys State program, aimed towards rising seniors as an opportunity to learn about the state government while taking on leadership roles; and WHEREAS, Daniel's Eagle Scout community service project involved seaweed harvesting and environmental nourishment along the beaches fronting Round island Beach Park to increase the awareness of beach conservation and dune nourishment. NOW, THEREFORE, . BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN IVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board recognizes the accomplishments of Daniel Richard Salvador, and honors him for his achievement. Adopted this 18th day of June, 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA seph . Flescher, Chairman r 4ey S. Davi , VicelChairman , • t l i o �.' Peter D. O'Bryan Bob lari Ti orc ' 201 ,1{ o -C +C� 1 ry d �. . �q�'""k s ulidions,a-- t We Congratulate You, BRANDON ROBERT MC KAY t on being a member of the 2012-Centennial Class of # t ' Eagle Scouts and joining a heritage of 100 years of - Excellence in the Boy Scouts of America By earning the ,VER, Eagle Scout Award Continue to strive for Excellence as you serve your fellow man: . , Always make your rank and your influence count strongly for better m, Citizenship in your home, in your community and in your contacts with other people. To this you have pledged your sacred honor. ORI Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Indian River County Board of County Commissioners a ` 4.4 r class I of* 1 - o a _ n, r,-- tulations J, r We Congratulate You, DANIEL RICHARD SALVADOR on being a member of the 2012 Centennial Class of Eagle Scouts and joining a heritage of 100 years of 1 r t Excellence in the Boy Scouts of America By earning the Eagle Scout Award Continue to strive for Excellence as you serve your fellow man. Always make your rank and your influence count strongly for better Citizenship in your home, in your community and in-your contacts with other people. To this you have pledged your sacred honor. ORI Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Indian River County Board of County Commissioners G JEFFREY R. SMITH (W Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller LORI�p' 1 801 27TH Street Vero Beach, Florida 32961 -1028 Telephone (772) 226-1945 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: June 6, 2013 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF WARRANTS May 31, 2013 to June 6, 2013 FROM: DIANE BERNARDO - FINANCE DIRECTOR In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all warrants (checks and electronic payments) issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached list of warrants, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the (W time period of May 31, 2013 to June 6, 2013. Attachment: DB: MS (aw 3 CHECKS WRITTEN CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 298960 6/3/2013 ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING&C D 1,792.28 (w 298961 6/3/2013 SANDY PINES LTD 553.00 298962 6/3/2013 ALL FLORIDA REALTY SERVICES INC 5,428.00 298963 6/3/2013 GERALD T CAPAK 265.00 298964 6/3/2013 CHERYL DOYLE 354.00 298965 6/3/2013 VERO BEACH EDGEWOOD PLACE(305-113) 671.00 298966 6/3/2013 GRACES LANDING LTD 6,450.00 298967 6/3/2013 MICHAEL JACKOWSKI 429.00 298968 6/3/2013 TERRY A LAWRENCE 77.00 298969 6/3/2013 LINDSEY GARDENS APARTMENTS 11,704.00 298970 6/3/2013 BRYAN D BLAIS 782.00 298971 6/3/2013 RIVER PARK ASSOCIATES 12,289.00 298972 6/3/2013 RICHARD C THERIEN 794.00 298973 6/3/2013 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD 3,943.00 298974 6/3/2013 DAVIDYORK 528.00 298975 6/3/2013 ST FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACH 967.00 298976 6/3/2013 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES 2,337.00 298977 6/3/2013 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 106.00 298978 6/3/2013 FULCHINI ENTERPRISES INC 287.00 298979 6/3/2013 VENETIAN APARTMENTS OF VERO BEACH 874.00 298980 6/3/2013 HERMOSA PROPERTIES LLC 308.00 298981 6/3/2013 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 6,873.00 298982 6/3/2013 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 13,514.00 298983 6/3/2013 DAVID SPARKS 561.00 298984 6/3/2013 CRAIG MERRILL 1,380.00 298985 6/3/2013 CHRISTINE SALTER 511.00 298986 6/3/2013 HAGGERTY FAMILY LTD 307.00 298987 6/3/2013 THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH 14,129.00 298988 6/3/2013 FELLSMERE COMM ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC 91.00 298989 6/3/2013 HENRY O SPEIGHT 645.00 298990 6/3/2013 DAVID CONDON 590.00 298991 6/3/2013 HILARY MCIVOR 505.00 298992 6/3/2013 PAULA LANE 376.00 298993 6/3/2013 FRANK BLAKE 442.00 298994 6/3/2013 JOHN A CAPPELLO 355.00 298995 6/3/2013 TCG SONRISE II LLC 571.00 298996 6/3/2013 KARL LACHNITT 718.00 298997 ' 6/3/2013 PELICAN ISLES LP 5,237.00 298998 6/3/2013 JOHN F BAER 2,017.00 298999 6/3/2013 CAMERON HORD 112.00 299000 6/3/2013 SUNCOAST REALTY&RENTAL MANAGEMENT LLC 5,204.00 299001 6/3/2013 OAK RIVER PROPERTIES INC 766.00 299002 6/3/2013 KENNEN COHEN 433.00 299003 6/3/2013 MARILYN LEWIS 226.00 299004 6/3/2013 STEPHEN J SHORT SR 442.00 299005 6/3/2013 MICHAEL KANNER 566.00 299006 6/3/2013 AD&IN SERVICES INC 229.00 299007 6/3/2013 RICHARD JOHN KELLER 706.00 299008 6/3/2013 ADINA GOLDMAN 459.00 299009 6/3/2013 INDIAN RIVER RDA LP 628.00 299010 6/3/2013 GEORGE THUYNS 685.00 299011 6/3/2013 STEVEN ROBERT HARTMAN 541.00 299012 6/3/2013 LAZY J LLC 402.00 299013 6/3/2013 STEPHANIE FOUNTAIN 273.00 299014 6/3/2013 WINFRIED ARENDT 153.00 299015 6/3/2013 SYLVIA MCNEILL 238.00 299016 6/3/2013 SKOKIE HOLDINGS INC 577.00 299017 6/3/2013 LILIAN N BEUTTELL 441.00 1 4 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 299078 6/6/2013 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES INC 561.00 299079 6/6/2013 PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC 83.76 299080 6/6/2013 GO COASTAL INC 155.00 299081 6/6/2013 RELIABLE POLY JOHN 45.78 299082 6/6/2013 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 5,245.70 299083 6/6/2013 CITY OF VERO BEACH 65,143.58 299084 6/6/2013 RUBBER STAMP EXPRESS&MORE INC 16.77 299085 6/6/2013 BEST WESTERN 223.99 299086 6/6/2013 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 142.32 299087 6/6/2013 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 277.30 299088 6/6/2013 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 49.29 299089 6/6/2013 FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE 35.00 299090 6/6/2013 FLORIDA GOVERNMENT FINANCE 105.00 299091 6/6/2013 FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC 7,526.68 299092 6/6/2013 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 1,036.20 299093 6/6/2013 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES 19,383.00 299094 6/6/2013 TREASURE COAST HOMELESS SERVICES 8,399.00 299095 6/6/2013 WAL MART STORES EAST LP 100.61 299096 6/6/2013 ACUSHNET COMPANY 143.08 299097 6/6/2013 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC 5,697.59 299098 6/6/2013 INDIAN RIVER HABITAT 12.33 299099 6/6/2013 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 4,362.18 299100 6/6/2013 ST JOHNS RIVER WATER MGMT DISTRICT 280.00 299101 6/6/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS 11.68 299102 6/6/2013 FEDERAL EXPRESS 22.22 299103 6/6/2013 JOEL V HERMAN 267.06 299104 6/6/2013 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 2,425.00 299105 6/6/2013 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 4,375.35 299106 6/6/2013 ACUSHNET COMPANY 1,927.19 299107 6/6/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 34.50 299108 6/6/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 129.10 299109 6/6/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 129.10 299110 6/6/2013 PUBLIC DEFENDER 10,214.91 299111 6/6/2013 GIFFORD YOUTH ACTIVITY CENTER INC 2,236.08 299112 6/6/2013 STATE ATTORNEY 1,016.72 299113 6/6/2013 STATEATTORNEY 1,200.00 299114 6/6/2013 KENNETH CAMPBELL SENIOR 60.00 299115 6/6/2013 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC 402.18 299116 6/6/2013 SEBASTIAN RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 100.00 299117 6/6/2013 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 25.00 299118 6/6/2013 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 500.00 299119 6/6/2013 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 650.00 299120 6/6/2013 TREASURE COAST SPORTS COMMISSION INC 26,715.38 299121 6/6/2013 BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOC OF FLORIDA 50.00 299122 6/6/2013 CENTRAL FLORIDA PRIMA 25.00 299123 6/6/2013 GERALD A YOUNG SR 45.00 299124 6/6/2013 MISDU MICHIGAN STATE 445.75 299125 6/6/2013 ALAN C KAUFFMANN 50.00 299126 6/6/2013 G K ENVIRONMENTAL INC 900.00 299127 6/6/2013 THE FLORIDA BAR 300.00 299128 6/6/2013 THE FLORIDA BAR 300.00 299129 6/6/2013 THE FLORIDA BAR 150.00 299130 6/6/2013 THE FLORIDA BAR 150.00 299131 6/6/2013 DONALD JONES 169.00 299132 6/6/2013 NEW JERSEY FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER 308.00 299133 6/6/2013 KEEP INDIAN RIVER BEAUTIFUL INC 4,217.53 299134 6/6/2013 COMCAST 69.95 299135 6/6/2013 COMCAST 100.28 299136 6/6/2013 THE PROFESSIONAL GOLFERS 451.00 299137 6/6/2013 LINDSEY MATHENY 60.00 3 V CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 299018 6/3/2013 ROGER WINSLOW 503.00 299019 6/3/2013 TAMMY MEEKS 719.00 299020 6/3/2013 VINCENT PILEGGI 451.00 299021 6/3/2013 OSLO VALLEY PROPERTIES INC 989.00 299022 6/3/2013 VICKY L STANLEY 797.00 299023 6/3/2013 CORY J HOWELL 202.00 299024 6/3/2013 CHOICE RENTALS INC 517.00 299025 6/3/2013 WILLIAM JAMES STANGANELLI 399.00 299026 6/3/2013 THE CHARLES F FOWLER 1996 CHARITABLE UNITRUS 848.00 299027 6/3/2013 OSCEOLA COUNTY SECTION 8 682.76 299028 6/3/2013 WYNN OWLE 572.00 299029 6/3/2013 WILLIAM NEUWIRTH 558.00 299030 6/3/2013 ANTHONY ARROYO 308.00 299031 6/3/2013 BRIGITTE BALL 535.00 299032 6/3/2013 AHS HOLDINGS GROUP LLC 3,447.00 299033 6/3/2013 COUNTY OF VOLUSIA HVC PROGRAM 638.76 299034 6/3/2013 AJL MANAGEMENT CORP 424.00 299035 6/3/2013 YVONNE KOUTSOFIOS 280.00 299036 6/3/2013 HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF ALLENTOWN 637.76 299037 6/3/2013 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF FULTON COUNTY 652.76 299038 6/3/2013 ALAN R TOKAR 649.00 299039 6/3/2013 2184 1ST PL SW LLC 584.00 299040 6/3/2013 VILLAS OF VERO BEACH 491.00 299041 6/3/2013 BRIAN E GALLAGHER 503.00 299042 6/3/2013 MANUEL V CAMACHO SR LLC 697.00 299043 6/3/2013 HOUSING AUTHORITY 719.76 299044 6/3/2013 ALCURT VERO BEACH LLC 2,958.00 299045 6/3/2013 CITY OF TUCSON 453.76 299046 6/3/2013 FRANKLIN TODD&DEANA MARCHANT 539.00 299047 6/3/2013 MICHAEL STILES 485.00 299048 6/6/2013 SPEEDWELL TARGETS 404.25 299049 6/6/2013 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 198.70 299050 6/6/2013 TEN-8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 5,246.63 299051 6/6/2013 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 135.20 299052 6/6/2013 VELDE FORD INC 906.91 299053 6/6/2013 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 493.96 299054 6/6/2013 E-Z BREW COFFEE&BOTTLE WATER SVC 11.48 299055 6/6/2013 KELLY TRACTOR CO 2,154.47 299056 6/6/2013 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 2,444.36 299057 6/6/2013 GAYLORD BROTHERS INC 112.78 299058 6/6/2013 KSM ENGINEERING&TESTING INC 3,775.00 299059 6/6/2013 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS,LTD 10,230.00 299060 6/6/2013 SCHULKE BITTLE&STODDARD LLC 12,004.47 299061 6/6/2013 EGP INC 160.00 299062 6/6/2013 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 33.50 299063 6/6/2013 BRODART COMPANY 115.00 299064 6/6/2013 PROFORMA IMAGING 63.56 299065 6/6/2013 TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC 2,641.38 299066 6/6/2013 FIRESTONE COMPLETE AUTO CARE 834.04 299067 6/6/2013 CENTER POINT INC 126.70 299068 6/6/2013 MORNING STAR PERSONILIZED APPAREL INC 2,257.50 299069 6/6/2013 BARTH CONSTRUCTION INC 218,579.60 299070 6/6/2013 CARTER ASSOCIATES INC 2,935.31 299071 6/6/2013 CARTER ASSOCIATES INC 812.55 299072 6/6/2013 DELL MARKETING LP 1,311.81 299073 6/6/2013 GENERAL PART INC 2,497.74 299074 6/6/2013 BLAKESLEE SERVICES INC 710.00 299075 6/6/2013 BAKER&TAYLOR INC 3,045.44 299076 6/6/2013 LOWES CO INC 999.82 299077 6/6/2013 MICROMARKETING LLC 31.96 2 5 CHECK NBR CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 299138 6/6/2013 LADELL YOUNG 50.00 299139 6/6/2013 MICHAEL QUIGLEY 60.00 299140 6/6/2013 REBECCA L MITCHELL 267.06 (w 299141 6/6/2013 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 820.68 299142 6/6/2013 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 120.03 299143 6/6/2013 JEAN PETERS 60.00 299144 6/6/2013 BOYLE&DRAKE,INC 2,250.00 299145 6/6/2013 CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 318.43 299146 6/6/2013 JOSEPH W VASQUEZ 75.00 299147 6/6/2013 BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS 1,250.00 299148 6/6/2013 RANDOM HOUSE INC 92.25 299149 6/6/2013 JACKS COMPLETE TREE SERVICE 2,217.73 299150 6/6/2013 STAPLES INC&SUBSIDIARIES INC 736.30 299151 6/6/2013 DAVID SILON 99.00 299152 6/6/2013 GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 52,523.23 299153 6/6/2013 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 203.51 299154 6/6/2013 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 206.27 299155 6/6/2013 ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 115.09 299156 6/6/2013 C W NIELSEN MFG CORP 156.00 299157 6/6/2013 ARDAMAN&ASSOCIATES INC 8,570.00 299158 6/6/2013 DAYSPRING 250.00 299159 6/6/2013 METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 336.85 299160 6/6/2013 FLORIDA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE&CONSUMER SR 2,996.00 299161 6/6/2013 1 ST FIRE&SECURITY INC 95.00 299162 6/6/2013 KELLY J TURNER JR 60.00 299163 6/6/2013 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 109.50 299164 6/6/2013 KENNY CAMPBELL JR 60.00 299165 6/6/2013 SUNCOAST REALTY&RENTAL MANAGEMENT LLC 500.00 299166 6/6/2013 SONRISE VILLAS LLC 500.00 299167 6/6/2013 MARY COLLIS 30.00 (W 299168 6/6/2013 JOHNNY B SMITH 75.00 299169 6/6/2013 COMMUNITY CHURCH 150.00 299170 6/6/2013 WILFRED HART 50.00 299171 6/6/2013 VANESSA ROSS 50.00 299172 6/6/2013 SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION 270.89 299173 6/6/2013 GLOBALSTAR USA 95.43 299174 6/6/2013 CHARLES A WALKER 60.00 299175 6/6/2013 CEMEX 164.14 299176 6/6/2013 REGENIA SWANSON 50.00 299177 6/6/2013 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 141.55 299178 6/6/2013 TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC 86.65 299179 6/6/2013 YOUTH GUIDANCE DONATION FUND 8,100.00 299180 6/6/2013 DAVID L HANCOCK 1,063.50 299181 6/6/2013 WILLIAM BOLTON 60.00 299182 6/6/2013 YOLANDA BELL 50.00 299183 6/6/2013 SANDY ARACENA 60.00 299184 6/6/2013 CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLERS OFFICE 27.50 299185 6/6/2013 D J P GENERAL CONTRACTING SERVICES INC 4,750.00 299186 6/6/2013 ATLANTIC COASTAL LAND TITLE CO LLC 150.00 299187 6/6/2013 KEMPER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 7.91 299188 6/6/2013 BOULEVARD TIRE CENTER 1,213.74 299189 6/6/2013 YOUR AQUA INSTRUCTOR LLC 60.00 299190 6/6/2013 SAFETY SCHELL CORPORATION 3,750.75 299191 6/6/2013 DELRAY MOTORS 206.98 299192 6/6/2013 AG SCAPE SERVICES INC 17,585.59 299193 6/6/2013 OVERDRIVE INC 3,445.47 299194 6/6/2013 RAYMOND J DUCHEMIN 60.00 299195 6/6/2013 A/R/C ASSOCIATES INC 1,050.00 299196 6/6/2013 SARA L MATHEWS 270.00 299197 6/6/2013 GOLD MEDAL PRODUCTS 552.00 4 CHECK NB R CK DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 299198 6/6/2013 BORRELLI&PARTNERS INC 4,000.72 299199 6/6/2013 HEATHER HATTON 60.00 299200 6/6/2013 GFA INTERNATIONAL INC 1,210.00 299201 6/6/2013 CM&S INDUSTRIES INC 5,560.00 299202 6/6/2013 WILD TURKEY ESTATES OF VERO LLC 2,242.15 299203 6/6/2013 CLEAN SWEEP&VAC LLC 4,320.00 299204 6/6/2013 REPROGRAPHIC SOLUTIONS INC 109.44 299205 6/6/2013 ANDREW SITEWORK LLC 104,592.59 299206 6/6/2013 LABOR READY SOUTHEAST INC 6,654.00 299207 6/6/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL LAND DEVELOPMENT INC 16,912.15 299208 6/6/2013 CARDINAL HEALTH 110 INC 1,341.10 299209 6/6/2013 KELLIE P KIELBASA 60.00 299210 6/6/2013 STEVE SPANGLER INC 354.13 299211 6/6/2013 KYLE ANDERSON 900.00 299212 6/6/2013 SUSAN BALLAD 9.46 299213 6/6/2013 THERESE FRANTZ 100.00 299214 6/6/2013 DENTIST E HALL JR 112.00 299215 6/6/2013 ALEX MIKLO 120.00 299216 6/6/2013 STACEY MILLER 50.00 299217 6/6/2013 OSHANNA ROBERTS 50.00 299218 6/6/2013 ANDREA GONZALEZ 50.00 299219 6/6/2013 DAVID EBERHARDT 164.33 299220 6/6/2013 H&H DUNIPSTERS LLC 4,253.70 299221 6/6/2013 LAKEYDRA BELL 50.00 299222 6/6/2013 JUDY BARTLETT 364.76 299223 6/6/2013 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE 2,000.00 Grand Total: 864,039.66 5 8 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 2449 5/31/2013 JMC SERVICES INC 41,853.85 2450 5/31/2013 VETERANS COUNCIL OF I R C 6,735.83 2451 5/31/2013 VEROTOWN LLC 1,750.00 2452 5/31/2013 KIMLEY HORN&ASSOC INC 7,475.00 2453 5/31/2013 VEROTOWN LLC 13,819.06 2454 5/31/2013 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 74,969.41 2455 5/31/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS 70,142.59 2456 5/31/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 2,964,036.48 2457 6/3/2013 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMIN 13,173.89 2458 6/4/2013 : BENEFITS WORKSHOP 8,688.82 2459 6/4/2013 : FL RETIREMENT SYSTEM 288,489.28 Grand Total: 3,491,134.21 (w 1 9 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS.NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1001722 6/3/2013 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 19,250.99 (w 1001723 6/3/2013 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 479.20 1001724 6/3/2013 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 1,254.97 1001725 6/3/2013 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 358.91 1001726 6/3/2013 EAST COAST ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER 28.00 1001727 6/5/2013 PARKS RENTAL&SALES INC 53.91 1001728 6/5/2013 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 780.00 1001729 6/5/2013 LIGHTSOURCE IMAGING SOLUTIONS LLC 298.00 1001730 6/5/2013 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 716.65 1001731 6/5/2013 MIKES GARAGE&WRECKER SERVICE INC 120.00 1001732 6/5/2013 HOMELAND IRRIGATION 88.62 1001733 6/5/2013 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 280.20 1001734 6/5/2013 SEBASTIAN OFFICE SUPPLY CO 121.59 1001735 6/5/2013 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 959.88 1001736 6/5/2013 S&S AUTO PARTS 59.87 1001737 6/6/2013 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 91.18 1001738 6/6/2013 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 240.21 1001739 6/6/2013 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 922.78 1001740 6/6/2013 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF FLORIDA 139.93 1001741 6/6/2013 APPLE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO 24.00 1001742 6/6/2013 ARAMARK UNIFORM&CAREER APPAREL LLC 19.44 1001743 6/6/2013 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 155.49 1001744 6/6/2013 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 1,048.94 1001745 6/6/2013 FLORIDA LEVEL&TRANSIT CO INC 1,319.00 1001746 6/6/2013 CAPITAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 330.34 1001747 6/6/2013 CUMMINS POWER SOUTH LLC 3,797.39 1001748 6/6/2013 AUTO PARTNERS LLC 1,080.02 1001749 6/6/2013 AT&T 3,709.37 1001750 6/6/2013 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 77.11 1001751 6/6/2013 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 2,812.75 1001752 6/6/2013 BERMUDA SANDS APPAREL LLC 1,502.28 Grand Total: 42,121.02 1 10 CONSENT AGENDA JUNE 18, 2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 10, 2013 SUBJECT: Out of County Travel to attend the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association Conference FROM: Terri Collins-Lister, Commissioner Assistant Out of county travel is requested for commissioners and staff to attend the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association Conference in Delray Beach, Florida on September 25 through September 27, 2013. Attachment FLORIDA SHORE & BEACH P.O.Box 13146 Tallahassee,Florida 32317-3146 PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION (850)906-9227 mall@fsbpa.com A League of Cities and Counties on Beach and Coastal Issues www.fsbpa.com IL 57th FSBPA Annual Conference Registration Form September 25-27, 2013 1 Delray Beach Marriott I Delray Beach, Florida REGISTRATION FEES Early Registration Regular Registration through August 28,2013 after August 28, 2013 ❑ Member Registration $325 O Member Registration $375 ❑ Non-Member Registration $375 LJ Non-Member Registration $425 ❑ Spouse/Non-Business Guest$125 * ❑ Spouse/Non-Business Guest $125 ❑ Full Time Students$125 ** LJ Full Time Students$125 ** * Spouse/Non-Business Guest registration fee includes Welcome Reception and Awards Banquet CAIw6ELtTION POLICY: ** Students must provide current student ID Carlla4vortEee ;SQ F�BPAnaustrece Epncellatton SELECT YOUR ENTREE selection for the Awards Banquet uesovrfi,6rema�yr - Thursday.September 26,2013 than ❑ Grilled Grouper SepTipp- l8tZQ23 Send ❑ Filet Mignon"Au Poivre" niqueest to SSRA aa ions, ❑ Vegetarian Meal POBox-4346, a1TQfiasse`e,FL 323fyot mar7ma'ilfcsfs6axom ❑ Not Attending Banquet Name Title Organization Address City State Zip Telephone Fax E-mail Spouse's Name, if registering and attending: Spouse's Entree Selection for Awards Banquet We also accept these credit cards: Please make checks pa American Express • MasterCard • VISA• Discover FSBPA 13146 e X132317 �w Credit Card Number: Expiration Date Security Code 3 or 4 digit code on back of card Cardholder Name Cardholder Signature If you our paying by credit card,you can FAX the form to 850-201-6782 or email to mail(icfsbna.com 12 20x3 FSBPA Annual Conference Hotel Info atim Defray Beach Marriott 10 North Ocean Boulevard Delray Reach,FL 33483 661-274-3200 Online Reservations For Reservations by Phone CaN . 362427 (W Room—Rates:S136*singleldou Erie plus taxes *the hotel has waived the resort fee. Self paddrig is avadable at$5.00 per day and valet parking is awar�able at discounted rate of$12 per days. Complimentary ifitemet access will be provided in 0!uest rooms. To ensure that a room is available, reservatiens should be made by August 28, 2013.After this date,rooms may not be available. WHEN MAWhJO YOUR RESERVATION, FLEE MENTION, the Florida Shore and Beach Prvatrdn Association,TO RECEIVE THE GROUP RATE. 13 CONSENT: 6/18/2013 qC. Office of s; INDIAN RIVER COUNTY r (W ATTORNEY T Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: illiam K. DeBraal - Deputy County Attorney THROUGH: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr. — County AttorrO� DATE: June 10, 2013 SUBJECT: Release of Conservation Easement SunUp ARC, Inc. In May, 2002 Sun-Up of Indian River Inc. granted a conservation easement to Indian River County in connection with a special exception use approval. That conservation easement was recorded in February, 2004 in Book 1696 at Page 297 of the Public Records of Indian River County and describes and depicts three areas of conservation. The property owner, SunUp ARC, Inc., currently has made application for a modification to the previously approved site plan, and County staff has determined that the existing three areas under conservation can be released because a new replacement conservation easement is being granted to the County to satisfy the current upland set-aside requirement. Presented herewith for consideration is the Release of Conservation Easement. FUNDING: The only cost associated with this matter is the recording fees, which will be borne by the property owner. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Release of Conservation Easement and authorize staff to record same in the Public Records of Indian River County, simultaneous with the recording of the new replacement conservation easement. nhm — attachment m�+an aver Ga A oved Date Admin. /� � Legal {, • � 13 APPROVED FOR ( Budget 1 3 B.C.0lY ETI T AGENDA Dept - C . Risk mi�. - 14 NTY ATTORNEY] (W RELEASE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida as the holder of a Conservation Easement from Sun-Up of Indian River Inc., recorded in Book 1696, Page 297, Public Records of Indian River County, hereby releases the areas under the conservation easement described in Book 1696, Page 297, Public Records of Indian River County, Florida so that a new replacement conservation easement can be granted to Indian River County and simultaneously recorded with this release. This Release of Conservation Easement approved on motion of Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner and upon being p-ut to a vote, the vote was as follows: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan (W Commissioner Bob Solari WITNESS my hand and seal this day of June, 2013. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Date of Approval: Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM ANDLEG Lk,D FI BY WILLIAMR,10CrdAkL (W DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY 15 gD Indian River County, Florida (W Memorandum TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Admimst THROUGH: Jason Brown, Director, OMB FROM: Beth Martin, Risk Managern� DATE: May 28, 2013 I�` SUBJECT: Mediated Settlement; Beverly Hatfield It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners consider the following Consent Agenda item at their June 18, 2013 regular meeting. Background Beverly Hatfield, a former landfill scale house operator, fell from a chair on August 12, 2005, injuring her back. She has had multiple surgeries. She has been administratively accepted as permanently, totally disabled by workers' compensation and Social Security disability benefits are pending. To date, $447,570.08 has been paid on this claim and an additional $276,429.92 is reserved. The proposed settlement of $295,000.00, if (W approved, will be paid by the County and then recovered from the two excess insurance companies; Princeton will pay the settlement portion that lies between $400,000.00 and $600,000.00 of the total claim and MidWest will pay above $600,000.00. Both carriers have approved the settlement and encourage the County to accept it as being in the best financial interests of the County and the insurers. Recommendation On May 22, 2013 the County's Claims Review Committee consisting of the County Administrator, County Attorney, OMB Director, Utility Services Director and Risk Manager with advice from Paul Westcott, defense counsel, approved the mediated settlement of $295,000.00 including attorney's fees and costs. In keeping with administrative policy, staff now requests Board approval of this settlement. Payment will be made from the Self Insurance Fund. If additional information is needed, please contact Beth Martin, Risk Manager, at Extension 1287. (MW 16 APPROVED FOR AGEND (W A osep A. Baird, County Administrator Indian River County Appr.Qyed Date June 18, 2013 Administration Legal Io. Budget Risk Management Department 17 CONSENT 2�5 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Through: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator From: Michael Zito, Assistant County Administrator Date: June 1, 2013 Subject: Request for Use of Holman Stadium for Annual Sawbones vs. Jawbones Event to be held June 29th, 2013 DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS The Indian River County Bar Association ("User Group") has requested use of Holman Stadium at the Vero Beach Sports Village for a fundraising / charity event. The Indian River County Bar Association is a 501(c) (6) non-profit organization conducting the event for the benefit of the United Way which is a 501 (c) (3) organization. The planned event is "Sawbones vs. Jawbones", a co-ed softball game between local doctors and attorneys. The event is scheduled for June 29th, 2013, at Holman Stadium. VeroTown, LLC has reviewed this request and has confirmed stadium availability as of this date. Section 6.04 of the Facility Use Agreement between the County and VeroTown, LLC allows the County use of the facility for up to ten days annually, exclusive of the "Harvest Festival". Any expenses associated with the use will be the responsibility of the User Group. No County funds or staff time will be utilized for the event. The group will also provide a $1,000,000 liability policy naming Indian River County and VeroTown, LLC as additional insured. The User Group has requested waiver and deletion of the standard $10,000 security deposit required under Section G of the Stadium Use Agreement based upon the fact that their proceeds will benefit numerous local charities. The User Group has also requested waiver and deletion of the alcohol prohibition required under Section E of Exhibit 1 to the standard Stadium Use Agreement. The User Group is seeking special permission to have the Vero Beach Sports Village conduct beer and wine sales at the event in accordance with state and local law. The Vero Beach Sports Village and the User Group will be responsible for all required permits and liquor liability insurance, and to arrange for any additional security necessary to responsibly conduct beer and wine sales at the event. A copy of the "Indian River County Holman Stadium Use Agreement" between the County and the User Group is available for review in the Board of County Commission office. (W 18 CONSENT (W RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the Agreement, authorize the Chairman to sign and grant the User Group's request for waiver of the standard security deposit and deletion of the alcohol prohibition required under Section E of Exhibit 1 to the standard Stadium Use Agreement. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: By?osep Indian River Co. &Appd Date A. BairdAdmin.nty Administrator Co. A - c •/S Budget For: D Dept. Risk Mgr. (W (W 19 IF CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (W PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: June 11, 2013 TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird, County Ad ni or Jason Brown, Director, O FROM: Jerry Davis,Purchasing Mana SUBJECT: Declare additional excess equipment surplus for sale or proper disposal BACKGROUND: The attached list of equipment has been declared excess to the needs of Indian River County and should be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the Florida State Statutes. This list of items is in addition to the list previously approved on May 14, 2013. The monies received from this sale will be returned to the appropriate accounts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners declare the additional listed items (W surplus and authorize its sale and/or proper disposal at the public auction to be held at 10:00 AM on June 22, 2013 at the County fairgrounds. The auction company, Associate Auctions, LLC was awarded RFP #2013025 for auctioneering services by Indian River County. There is no cost to the county for this service as the auction company collects a buyer's premium from the buyers. ATTACHMENTS: Additional Excess Equipment List APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River Co d 15aie j Admin By: A� Legal farir 0 •( .13 seph . Baird,County Administrator Dedaeitment Risk Manager Fo 20 Additional Excess Equipment List Printed:6/12/2013 Indian River County N Date In Surplused Dept Asset# Fleet# Description Serial Number Working Storage pick-up Date by BCC Condition Location 5/21/13 Shooting Range N/A Clay Machine 003087 No 5/21/13 Shooting Range N/A Clay Machine 101042 No 5/21/13 Shooting Range N/A Clay Machine 003086 No 5/21/13 ShootingRana N/A Clay Machine Rabbit 820001102 No 5/21/13 Shooting Range N/A Clay Machine 007084 No 5/21/13 Shooting Range N/A Clay Machine 007086 No 6/11/13 Traffic 144770 Dynatel System Cable Locator 036-062 No Operations 6/11/13 Computer 21818 A,B,C Primary San Unit N/A No Services 6/11/13 Computer 21819 Secondary San Unit N/A No Services 6/11/13 Computer 22511 A,C,D Dell Powervault 132T N/A No Services 6/11/13 Computer 23012 Dell Poweredge 2850 Server N/A No Services 6/11/13 Computer 23014 Dell Poweredge 2850 Server N/A No Services 6/11/13 Computer 23422 Dell Poweredge 2850 Server N/A No Services 6/11/13 Computer 21227A Dell Poweredge 2600 Server N/A No Services 6/11/13 Computer 21219 Dell Poweredge 2600 Server N/A No Services 6/11/13 Computer 24178 Watchguard 1250E Firebox N/A No Services 6/11/13 Building Det 22395 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Buildine Det 22373 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 22215 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 23062 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 22216 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 22213 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 22260 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 22217 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 22205 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 22392 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 22214 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Building Det 23061 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Purchasinp, 22007 Dell In iron 9100 Laptop 3R8X351 lYes Pag*4f 3 Additional Excess Equipment List Printed:6/12/2013 N Indian River County N Date In Surplused Dept Asset# Fleet# Description Serial Number Working Storage Pick-up Date by BCC Condition Location 6/11/13 Health Det N/A Hon 2 Drawer File Cabinet N/A Yes 6/11/13 Health Det N/A Steelcase 5 Drawer File Cabinet N/A Yes 6/11/13 Health Det N/A 2 Drawer File Cabinet N/A Yes 6/11/13 Health Det N/A Small Vaccine Freezer N/A No 6/11/13 Health Det N/A 5 Chairs N/A Yes 6/11/13 Health Det N/A Blackberry&Motorola Phones N/A Yes 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A HP 6500 Desktop Printer CNX8261L7K Yes Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A HP LaserJet 1100 USPE017376 Yes Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A Dell Monitor CN-OCC352-64180-71U-5UUC Yes Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A Acer Monitor 82804004240 Yes Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A Brother HL5150 Printer U60965D5J810212 No Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A HP LaserJet 1200 Printer CNCQ282330 No Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A Brother HL-S 1 Printer U60964E6J189980 No Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A RCA Audio System Radio RS-2521 Yes Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A 2 Acroprint Time Clocks 0182332MO&0096307LM No Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of N/A Dell Dimension 2400 Printer 18M8J81 Yes Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of 20670 Dell Optiplex Computer N/A Yes Elections 6/11/13 Supervisor of 22224 Dell Dimension 2400 Computer N/A Yes Elections 6/11/13 Facilities 149110 Honda Skid Mount Sprayer Hondag001-2241551 No Management 6/11/13 Facilities 49200 Carpet Cleaner Castem 143355HDD No Mana ement 6/11/13 Courthouse 23853 Canon IR5070 Copier 10959542/SXP18585 Yes 6/11/13 Courthouse 23964 Canon IR5070 Copier 10959573/SXP24859 Yes 6/11/13 Courthouse 124215 Canon IR5070 Copier SXP28544/10959505 Yes 6/11/13 Property 181050 Sun 20"Color Monitor 365133501 No Appraiser Pag3 Additional Excess Equipment List Printed:6/12/2013 M Indian River County N Date In Surplused Dept Asset# Fleet# Description Serial Number Working Storage Pick-up Date by BCC Condition Location 6/11/13 Traffic 21855 Dell GX270 Computer CS 2077 No Engineering 6/11/13 Traffic 20900 Dell C510 Laptop 8HQCO21 No Engineering 6/11/13 Health Det N/A Wooden Desk N/A Yes 6/11/13 Parks Det 22267 Dell Computer 80Z7Y41 No 6/11/13 Utilities 191320 430 2000 Ford E-350 1FDWF36FIYEC91706 Yes 6/11/13 Utilities 1624210 430 Liftmore Crane N/A Yes 6/11/13 Parks Det 22267 Dell Ins iron 5160 Laptop 42710049577 No 6/11/13 Parks Det N/A Acer Scanner 99S106103A2050008SSZ000 No 6/11/13 Utilities 1104810 Initial PC S/W&Conversion Kit 30F5382 Yes 6/11/13 Utilities 110500 Mod 3197 Display Unit 1CD GB Yes 6/11/13 Utilities 160890 IBM7857 Modem 53-A7348 Yes 6/11/13 Utilities 183450 IBM AS400 10-19556 Yes 6/11/13 Utilities 133020 600 MB DASD for AS400 OOBBAIA Yes 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25162 Samsung Tablet N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25161 Samsung Tablet N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue N/A Samsung Tablet BC3593B 900043R No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 21932 Battery Charger N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 208150 Nonin Pulse Ox 118303044 No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 23664 AED/Life ak 500 N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 10731 Sharp Computer Projection Panel N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 24206 Capnograph N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 24152 Ca no h N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 18382 Coma La to &Printer N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue N/A Camera Cage 22504-021 No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25217 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25198 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25190 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25195 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25216 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25196 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25192 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 25200 Dell Laptop N/A No 6/11/13 Fire Rescue 189850 LPE Portable Radio N/A No 6/12/13 Utilities 26565 256 2013 Ford F150 Totaled 291 miles 1FTMF1CM8DFC06402 No Fleet PagJ3 CONSENT (W INDIAN RIVER COUNTY MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph Baird County Administrator FROM: Colleen Peterson, Human Resources Manager and Jason E. Brown, Director, Office of Management&Budge DATE: June 10, 2013 SUBJECT: Payroll Projected Week Staff seeks approval to implement a one-week lag in the payroll period in order to eliminate the "projected" week at the June 18, 2013 regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners. In addition,staff seeks approval to compensate employees for one week of lost wages by giving employees the equivalent of one week's pay at the time the one-week lag is implemented. Background County employees are paid every two weeks. The two-week pay period begins on a Friday and ends on a (W Thursday,and employees are paid through the Thursday immediately before payday Friday. Departments are required to turn in their payroll to Human Resources at the end of the first week of the pay period. As a result, the hours for the second week are "projected" based on the hours the employee is normally scheduled to work. Therefore,additional hours worked and absences during the second week of the pay period cannot be processed until the following pay period. In addition,employees who work less than the "projected"hours are overpaid, and these pay adjustments are also made the following pay period. The County's payroll software(i.e.,Munis)has features that cannot be currently utilized because of the "projected" week. One example is our inability to key in time and attendance on a daily basis. In addition,the"projected"week results in a significant number of pay adjustments having to be made every pay period. Additionally, the County is in the process of upgrading to a new version of the Munis software. This version has additional functionalities that will streamline the payroll process. In order to utilize the software to its full potential and realize increased efficiencies in the payroll process, it is necessary to eliminate the"projected"week. In summary,the current payroll system results innumerous operational challenges for the organization. If the County implements a one-week lag in the pay period, the"projected"week would be eliminated and employees would be paid for actual time worked. Fundin The proposed elimination of the "projected" week will result in the deferral of one week's payment to employees. Staff proposes to eliminate the "projected" week for the pay period beginning August 16, (W 2013. Under the proposed plan, this would mean that employees would be compensated for work through August 22,2013 on the August 30, 2013 paycheck. If the current system were maintained,the 24 August 30`h paycheck would compensate employees for work through August 29, 2013. Therefore, employees would receive pay for one week rather than two weeks for the pay period when the one-week lag is implemented(August 30'"). It is important to note that County employees have not received a pay increase of any kind since fiscal year 2008/09(FY 2009/10 for IAFF bargaining unit)and no COLA since 2007/08. Furthermore, all employees were required to contribute 3%to the Florida Retirement System effective July 1, 2011, effectively reducing take-home pay by a similar amount. In light of these circumstances, the loss of one week of pay at this time would create a hardship for many employees. Staff recommends that the employees receive compensation for this week of lost wages. The staff proposal would result in essentially no change in cashflow from remaining in the status quo payroll system. For example, consider an employee making $26,000 per year. This employee receives $1,000 in gross pay (before deductions) each pay period. Under the proposal, this employee would receive$1,000 on the August 30''paycheck. The additional expense to the County would essentially be a balance sheet item at the end of the fiscal year. The County would simply need to record a larger wages payable liability to reflect the additional one-week lag. The estimated cost of compensating employees for the one-week lag is $781,621 on a countywide basis (please see attached worksheet). The total estimated impact on taxing funds is $599,042. As noted above,this will result in an increased liability recorded on the County's financial statements, but essentially no immediate impact on cashflow. The cashflow impact would be realized over time as workers end their employment with the County,and pay for the last week is received. Recommendation Staff recommends the Board authorize staff to implement a one-week lag in the payroll period in order to (W eliminate the "projected" week. In addition, staff recommends that the Board authorize staff to compensate employees for the week of lost wages by giving employees the equivalent of one week's pay at the time the one-week lag is implemented. Staff recommends implementing the one-week lag in the pay period beginning August 16, 2013. Additionally, staff recommends that the Board authorize the necessary Budget Amendment to fund the financial impact of compensating employees for the lost week estimated at$781,621 on a countywide basis. Attachments Worksheet—Projected Pay Week-Estimated Financial Impact APPROVED FOR AGENDA: A. aO/3 tseph.Tkaird, County Administrator ate Admin. Approval Date Le al P •12-•I Budget 1 l Dept. Risk M t. 25 Projected Pay Week - Estimated Financial Impact 1-week lag For FY 13/14 w/benefits General Fund(BCC) $130,219 MSTU Fund $55,459 Transportation Fund $115,402 Emergency Services Fund $297,962 Taxing Funds Subtotal $599,042 SWDD $8,435 Special Revenue Acccts $18,746 Golf Course $10,498 Building Dept $16,783 ,r Utilities $113,580 Internal Service Funds $14,537 Grand Total $781, 221 Note: The estimate above is based upon the cost of compensating employees for the one week of lost pay realized with the elimination of the "projected"week. This amount includes the cost of salary and benefits at rates in place as of 5/30/13. Staff's proposal is to implement this on the pay period ending August 30, 2013. F:\Budget\2013-2014 Budget\Salaries\COLA SCENARIOS\COLA SCENARIOS.xls 6/12/2013 26 Consent Agenda (W Indian River County Interoffice Memorandum Office of Management & Budget To: Members of the Board of ty ommissioners From: Jason E. Brown Director, Office of Manage ent Budget Date: June 10, 2013 Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 019 Description and Conditions The attached budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following: 1. The telephone and call reporting system software at the County Administration Complex and the EOC has reached the end of its useful life and needs to be replaced. In addition, the Sonet telephone system has become obsolete and is also in need to replacement. The attached entry appropriates funding for this expenditure in the amount of $184,400 from Optional Sales (W Tax/Cash Forward Oct 1St, and $50,000 from 911 Surcharge/Cash Forward Oct 1St 2. The boiler at the Indian River County Jail is in need of replacement. The attached entry appropriates funding in the amount of$66,197 from Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward Oct 1St Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the attached budget resolution amending the fiscal year 2012/2013 budget. Attachments Budget Amendment 019 and Resolution APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River County A roved Date BY: &LAI/ Administrator Jos ph A. Baird Legal G• IZ• 1 County Administrator Budget lZ 13 For: June 18, 2013 Department Risk Management 27 RESOLUTION NO. 2013- (W A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 BUDGET. WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the adopted Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County desires to amend the fiscal year 2012-2013 budget, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2013. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Board of County Commissioners Clerk of Court and Comptroller By By Deputy Clerk Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY COUNTY ATTORNEY 28 Exhibit "A" Resolution No.2013- (W Budget Office Approval: r Budget Amendment: 019 Jason E.Br wn, B dget Dire Entry Fund/Departm nt/ count Name Account Number Increase Decrease Number 1. Revenue 911 Surcharge/Cash Forward Oct 1st 120039-389040 $50,000 $0 Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward Oct 1 st 315039-389040 $184,400 $0 Expense 911 Surcharge/Communications 12013325-066450 $50,000 $0 Center/Communication Equipment Optional Sales Tax/Facilities Man agement/Fiberoptics 31522019-066510-03006 $184,400 $0 2. Revenue Optional Sales Tax/Cash Forward Oct 1 st 315039-389040 $66,197 $0 Expense Optional Sales Tax/Sheriff/law Enforcement 31560086-099040 $66,197 $0 (W (W 29 Consent Agenda Indian River County Interoffice Memorandum Office of Management & Budget To: Members of the Board qeent Commissioners From: Jason E. Brown Director, Office of ManBudget Date: June 11, 2013 Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 020 Corrections Improvements Description and Conditions The Sheriff has requested funding for additional land clearing, paving, fencing, and warehouse expansion for the Corrections facility (please see attached letter). These needs were identified in 2007 when plans were pursued to expand their warehouse building. On December 18, 2012, the Board of County Commissioners approved phase one of this project. The attached letter requests funding for phase three of this project in the amount of$174,787. Under the County's code, all funds collected from corrections facilities impact fees shall be used for (w the purpose of capital improvements to corrections facilities under the jurisdiction of the county and not for maintenance or operations. Such acquisitions and improvements shall be those which are necessary to accommodate new growth and development in the County. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve the expenditure of Corrections Impact Fees in the amount of $174,787 and also approve Budget Amendment 020 and Budget Resolution necessary to amend the fiscal year 2012/2013 budget. Staff also recommends that the Board make a determination that these expenses are necessary to accommodate growth and development in the County. Attachments Letter from Sheriff Loar dated June 7, 2013 Budget Amendment 020 and Resolution APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: ^ Indian River County APProved Date Administrator 3 3 BY: Jos ph A. Baird Legal(W County Administrator Budget FOR: June 18, 2013 Department Risk Management 30 RESOLUTION NO. 2013- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 BUDGET. WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the adopted Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County desires to amend the fiscal year 2012-2013 budget, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2013. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Board of County Commissioners Clerk of Court and Comptroller By By Deputy Clerk Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY c.� COUNTY ATTORNEY 31 hibit"A" Resolution No.2012- c Budget Office Approval: Budget Amendment:020 Jason E. rown, udget Director Entry Fund/Depart en t/ count Name Account Number Increase Decrease Number 1. Revenue Impact Fees/Cash Forward-Oct 1st 103039-389040 $174,787 $0 Expense Impact Fees/Corrections/Sheriff-Detention Center 10360121-099140 $174,787 $0 32 Sheriff Deryl Loar Indian River County June 7, 2013 The Honorable Joe Flescher, Chairman Indian River County Board of County Commissioners 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Chairman Flescher: This letter is my request to be placed on the next Board of County Commissioner's Consent Agenda with (W reference to Corrections Impact Fees. The first Phase of the project was approved in December 2012 prior to the expiration of the Corrections Impact Fees and the second Phase of the project with fees scheduled to expire in March 2013. The attached(Phase III)includes the final paving and the expansion of the existing warehouse by 20'. Quotes are attached and we are requesting$174,787 to complete. A portion of this request includes Corrections Impact Fees which are expiring on June 30, 2013. If you should need additional information,please contact me. Sincerely, Deryl Loar, Sheriff DL:jp (W 4055 4Is'Avenue,Vero Beach, Florida 32960 www.iresheriff.org (772) 569-6700 r--t, zt.*a Sheriff Deryl Loar Indian River County June 7,2013 Included in request for approval: 1. Phase II-Fees to County for Site Plan and Land Clearing=$770.00 2. Phase II-Architectural/Engineering proposal=$9,200 3. Phase II-Change Order/Revision-Cathco Inc._$14,176 4. Phase III-Engineering/Construction Administration=$6,825 5. Phase III-Added Fencing at South of wall=$5,585 6. Phase III-20'Warehouse expansion=$129,055 7. Phase III-Pallet Racks/Warehouse=$5,948 (W 8. Phase III-Site Work/Warehouse=$3,228 Total= $174,787 (W 4055 41sc Avenue,Vero Beach,Florida 32960 www.iresherifforg (772)569-6700 Sheriff Deryl Loar Indian River County May 28, 2013 The Indian River County Sheriff's Office is accepting quotes on the attached specifications for the Warehouse Expansion(Project#2013.01). Please submit quote by lune 7,2013 for consideration. Drawings and specification are available upon request: Indian River County Sheriff's Office Martha Asher,Director/Support Services Division 4055 41st Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 772-978-6200 office 772-473-6853 cell 4055 41 Avenue,Vero Beach,Florida 32960 www.iresherifforg (772)569-6700 _ Cfl N00'79'35 E 1301.94' PROPERTY LINE AS ESTABLISHED BY S g BEARING BASE O � _----..,_—,—,--._.._--------..._.-- .r--- (7 vastro 7mWLM 0 MPH MiA I * W.4`° rI rwWW I I II ' '--�e.�r s w L J � n�� I a+e...�•ti...+1 I �v.w ww I I I w 1"..w.Wa..rr."1 �—--j I L_""J —._1 Wio a I I Izr. LJ IzY w w L-2,.,r_ I lit � I r c I L706 rf I I I I I I I SITE DATA L JT.—�.� L.J, I I f Om /Amhw 91eu jlol'ew..'lee Cevw'ae.3s.a'r 11'ente Pro reea.s Su PMNnn: eRHr lets ttLHn a.sr�wra. m ,o»,w AwA. MASA: aAmaw a feniU r.troen LS ASA is wn AK'.ron wR MY L Au an00nR Iar111c awl.S awA[o Ha11 A0110.N4 0aaveAnl AM.1AorArx 10l3,w AYfN.. NA0!Ml K awo un ANA: Y!]Ar!!).(art AOOIIpHL 1iw1AR/rAOa.VR(mot L)00! 3 /10. 41 T®9 Y.ALL N.OANCF f%OIC MGt)Alpl awL M WMMO N Ca4l11Cip1'MM M 4110.[pLL a1RA:0 a11LL/Mi A M10H r MAY00AL ApOtl!!pNLwrrlll. M.0 O/A01L ROIrM anio M A0. a.1u ALV! )�CJ6A atlpq g L OAOV 1111 am AOa1WIL AV[RAO PLLY RY! 6 1qI! S1tMY MTA G MOKrO.Y IW)KY4.a.4 wrC�Y ANaR K'.OIfH.CS r04.(m)%1-i100 fmnlC ft1Mo tt lO�w C�rbl v¢0.4Cr iiG ItlOMRY IL YOtl. rUM10 LAID NE M(>Aa1 M !!IH IIAV Twa•. Dos a' Mn0 StIL 1grALH,k 1 FYYY/rAIA tOmNi.Nrs oucTY9R ar M aAr(TY 10PAMR AWYWwt' Ant rAA D R h 19 f)DOOM 00 OOOOwO 001eMfM MOa IeaLm* •!.V)f Mees•s aaw fa.HONat0H1a 41l9Iwe1 war ArD AAE wr HLHDM Al vAAi m !TART Mfk Jwvy!Otl >7 J9 T 00009 00 00000}O TOnL M.YA.Asr M10f ).fA1! SR,W Y 11[414 IRO..LT.IaIrM1a R0 AOMtliRAM APFrOrAI AA-tl-W-II NPlCA1g1/)OIO: rltlil Mni AMr 004 Jt 19 T7 00009 Qt 000001.1 TOTAL w wA LMLO a'Inai) MTAY rATHG tAVI RM.L0aI1Y 111LIIb M R W'W l.�C�.Y 0�..�'P..]001 a 0 ,w NM! aNM R MIH PC RYKnfYYf M rA1nrARc raw sm sw.rr alum r r....Art.aLra 3,w.....S.rro uv P+9n-t ! ♦rwlt Hc. Zdan CM.RMI(�'1 PSkLra emw*rats 1 Mea. ro Laan nwL n. Sm+rlc oAae IRn mx listr-aLR a ltd MIWMR1ArS&Iwd Pa'vAtm ftwVe1411.a YIRO MACK K 10110 ILL(m11H-Si00.fAw(ml 0H_001 4Oi wne no's 0 ■ .Td1Atl/YA01UM AO011pt AOw Y 1/100! aA 10A0b 1RlW wRR ttLMY. IMpR M OLAr AVPROVAt FROM TARD a1nA0.` S 0YposereL 1014E AOnRAM lACri RLOiiRR ,lvALV 04.R LAM� AOarr 1C0 YARD%1NLY.' LT d 0.1RTq LLfitQ W CON'OaM11R aU4 YA90]ROAGF q # Hn NwL 10Rr0 aawx 1.Io1R 111 M �YMR 0]YAL'b�IV�ILtl 10.1 rA01Y LONRAR tai Rr KVVCO YALla YALt! -YIa1 lOAOtl a.art Ar Ir iM•'wraNR//Ar1f1 SITE PLAN w r...W 9r.w o.+r rr LOr'AL.0oaa :w11+.rr�as iw:.w.L"wv MA MASTELLER & MOLER INC. Construction Plans �_• uw:-"~w x CONSULTNC ENGINEERS w.w Rc nOtru Ja ■ eft ■ 1655 270 STREET-son$VERO BEAK FLORI K0LILI �^r�.y'•w.w�.w1 wW rAvn1 M Kxir M>aa.H IV— (771)567-5900 /FAX(OF MnWOMAIM 771)791-116 Indian River County Sheriff's Office ..�� S REVISIONS G7RWArt #42NP9 t y Rwr cw.Y 12 oh f' 1 Sheriff Deryl Loar Indian River County Warehouse Expansion Project Phase III Drawing/Specifications to: May 28,2013 R.F.Concrete/Vero Beach $154,000(site work included) Cathc4 Inc-J5 to work $3,228 Proctor Construction Declined to Quote Milton Construction $129,055 Summit Construction $134,000 (W Recommendation - Milton Construction $129,055 Cathco Inc. $3,228 (W 4055 41s`Avenue,Vero Beach,Florida 32960 www.iresherifforg (772)569-6700 PON INDIAN RIVER COUN'T'Y SHERIFF NEW ORDER 7721569-6700 x6206 Fax 7721299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 54020 Page: 1 of I o-f �J�f #4Ct:'I"I} L _J: f ?:lG}�K-�`YffC'� '�f Wfi��µS't'!� f !Gf�rAYJY.t >xiYF ��f�fn yJSC�� i✓�9 W ..F_y}>��Yy�Sr�f I 'r�. -i✓ i t4.arM`'f G'f•t f F" 4 �t✓af< .. ?r{ QTOM ✓:•`�.- s3 � d•1�1 .E.+i .s9f�ry!"r � r r,2fA k� vy 2w -y -}' f .:r A'�,�r-�: r+t f ` .7s�, 3$}}' f}z'aaJpfv:ar-xrir3! !£.,} r:.'"-Jf��:v tFfi. a r }}d !p> n y�,r =sa• �� $rt� r ,t f X un4 �"+�•�� t r:✓ Y ' .�3¢fpY.,•c zS'' � '+L"'}- tL- �i » r t^', .,ay,$•<-{i..:Frs Y;i ::h !' f-l.,�ri'"-.y'r{'f� ;� �/•a/�F.[l ;r .. �. ,'-!'F�.tir r f? `- $�s f. err jY` r a-' .`J' '. �rc !�'✓/$��}rJ{.r -{� f rrrrf, tf �;,$t '` ✓ (g HE %;',�� .. . -5. : ✓- *+, t - ✓ t'; k . r dt3 F�r-:3 .4 ✓.{1aay■5,'?f^tsr4:fi•'.x.. tr�' .i.. 'y✓ /fF�y t +ita./v-�:-.1°_ru3r./.J!r.` cV A. l <.✓.;�C. .t Y -v �_•Yi xre}:.:..-;.c;:. l .,.. rt ti. d t t _r✓.✓ r'ti' .yr s' +4t ft r t:. ''� t. ,S .. t yf- �d sa.,r ! }{ f w 65�t •cars c F 3 y�j�pp +fit OrdCredcr:...:... SDC Y.::.✓ . . 06/10�/13g 07/10113 D.M eet BEST DuN30 i.77 IS lS +t tt 2� 'M�uw4 #i,fM♦ au F. I M15"14 ;: k•�.,�-r - >.�.tea. .. ,. . .. ..,.. r<.J� t�ay��-'{.h :r<.:n .�„,�`b-!�1'..k�`b,�yr,:tiYs♦ �t Glr ksr..'. � G msJ �>s t�f._..ry :`N� u.:'3...Q�n� ..b.✓<.... ....<...}.t7Jr4-F<... -o-�,rt.-x.:f'~�. K::s�w9.J•.,-,fi<"�Xrf r`l.Ts'�.:_..., 1..z..k��:;:.�f,Y , -_..: .-<'rif. ✓.....,v st �11UC0. ..,f'f 1 1.00 EA IRC JAIL WAREHOUSE EX PAN 3,228.0000 3,228.00 G/L# 168600521 Our Stock#900-350-010-0000 io SITE WORK AS FOLLOW A. SIDEWALK DEMO B. FENCE REMOVAL REPLACEMLI C. BUILDING P ING & COMPAC N, D. RAISE T STRUCTURE. E. CON DEWALKS, F. F ING. AS THCO, INC. LETTER 6, 2013 . ** TOTAL ** 3,228.00 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: *t_ p�+;pyy; g +fsr rJ :...} } 1. Mail Invoices to Indian River County Sheriff ""'"'$• � Attn: Accounts Payable �f.! 4055 41st Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 f 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this order without prior approval e p pp by the Purchasing Dept. 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, S4 prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. S. State Tax Exempt #: State # 85-80126220350-0 EIN: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Sniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneircaheriff.org Vendor 38 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER (W 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 54x21 Page: 1 of 3 * V �l 'r°* �# 33, 1:IYl;RTQ* :�r ' 933 �ikDRll: 1TTl E /�1T1lENx yn fl l- } -- rk J F�i3. ta <f '11 k s• y,sti� �.}vfi=: » Yr�r„e ,FYrs ! <r J - !'' t sr a r .^}^.c o 59>'rr+{ K _mak Win¢ Y �� rIE ,r•r }}J lr.>#.c J, ar- ..2 .tfr f •v n }t <s a J 'e'ay 5<J'}f• {�.rfn'fy�ux } lsS t }>".. 4'�rfia 3r`f.` '§• ` c > .,r.✓c>Y } m y { 4yf-zi:;?.:-:,y -}.r."X:=J.:+r.<..f5Y.f4. ::.. 3c:6 fr. J ,9' J It rll!r. - �.✓. r'`'1� ��¢ !k e ", `-> t n„!k�. ,e.< a'•.'};�<,rG�!'�lx'.-.k:�: ��...�-r' .s.r><-..,f,.- ....ice� r_ ..............,.:..... r- ..:.i:._r...,........ ......r.v:.. .....{. v, .v f.:...... ......... .......:.�... ."i::rt.?:, h..'t.-:�` �� r'• _. .. v_. olnohl I oft Net 6 _.•'.. ... 1 ¢4x! f�:r-rs'f�'Rc�tlt�x�''''�`.r.-..., __ �r,'�Y` J�, ',�.'�.irz.-,� .. � s fi '=:r.';<.a.1�``w-}�rv,�s`.�:"�r,} '-: J�j k<.fi • � ( � . ..�- .�:T3' `{<�.. . ._ }:�.G.�-.'�- :r..�-+� _ �.'trrdr.,i_.«F.:A' l1aCa•F. s 1 1.00 EA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY' JAIL29,055.0000 129,055.00 G/L# 168600521K Our Stock#900 350-010-0000 WAREHOUSE ADDITION. CONSTRUCTION OF M PORTION AS PER S SPECIFICATIONS IN THE (bw _MILTON CONSTRII N LETTER DATED JITNE- 2fl WITH THE FOLLOWING EICATIONS: GENERAL ONS: A. P ES ARE INCLIID 13. ES ARE EXMUD C. AND FORMBOARD S' ARE INCLUDED. L COMPACTION TESTING & NCRETE TESTING ARE INCLUDED. PROGRESS & FINAL CLEANUE ARE INCLUDED. SITEWORR: A. ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS HPVE BEEN EXCLUDED INCLUDING: 1. STRIPPING,GRADING, COMPACTION. 2. FINAL GRADE, VBNDOR INSTRUCTIONS: - f 1. Bail Invoices to : Indian River County Sheriff Attn: Accounts Payable , 4055 41st Avenue ;;...' Vero Beach, PL 32960 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this e order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. (W 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terns, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. S. State Tax Exempt is State 0 85-802262203SC-0 Ely: 59-6000677 Buye 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Kniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneiresheriff.org V=dOr 39 , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER (W 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772!299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 54021 Page:2 of 3 <.......... r .. r r. tt {s.��./c�.�,� ,�,.y��'- trr� 4F>YzE 0 0t -N-.ss�{"?;fl�,,,lp Y v..,Y•r5:-.v sr r,:f r�'7�.• _,�., �..,,.��a:+�,: .,��,.�.:a,-,.�fyv£� r.c,<: at,. ti}. '?, •� -_x✓f flr} 1r ..Y✓7Y wag , x�I.,fr./� _-sY-i�%!IS t'•• rrr:•, g. fiY4 "Vxr` l'AJS% r�'4f s,d'r.� ,, YFYih l: k`s r bya a ,r- rf-r 5, y err ,. a, Yh`� 'jSK. Er�is r a rc � a>ir�.Yi �v {<t! -f� •'�_r4�rt:sa-'�'rrlfl'" 'Fr'.s'.,:,,.,yrr.'' 9' ..fr "41" _.'.R. YEy� BELZ , _ frri, nrf �ru.•;-,. ` fr � ?•� a � r a �` lr 7s- y:f'--r� r s rr�wf art: I,.' 1cC�p '�a .E{ G az y.- .a �` Jr i 3 "iAr 'r!_.;hy v... s:;jl�r' rf''Y%�fr1� ✓f:>r<•y 3� 3' „ r,. r cr y f - s f � r ..r- :,:r,' 'a�r ��cc,, f.:, ;�•. r t c� r y f,.x rrrr ry,z Y.ef !^ r ' .,,t .✓a ti`v� �. '.4 s*NX�c r�� ..Fy� lr r c £?tC ,Fi 3F 'r- ar .0 ?Y t f c Xl.I�Z...:.•?. f� � A.,-C... afifY.-_ 06/10/13 07/10/13 Due Net 30 ra. .: i 3ra r a rrG -:v..J�.-�,�a•��y ,.+: �.�,,r r-r. r - _ ,r f i�j7'�.y. r?' r .:.o< S".r�:•�1W13t37.f1%,c ..,. •�'3•' �. .. ..�.t'ir 1.wr. �s.v..l� ':},'•.-f-... �{l.�k-a3`�f�.�.�y..:tf�r2':�.��ryj ^sY MASM L352Z4,1 7 4W4M" 77?l 7�R59• LANDSCAPING S IRRIGATION. 3. APRONS OR 4. FENCING. CONCRETE: A. INSTALLED S AND SPECIFICATI - O CHANG S TO FO TI ARE PROP( Ir STEEL S METALS: A. COLUMN INCLUD ARD PRIMER. MOISTURE PROTECTI & ROOF INSULATION ER & WALL SECTION - ACING. AND WINDOWS: ROLL UP DOORS TO MATCH EXISTING. B. NEW DOORS TO BE RE-KEYE PER OWNER'S DIRECTIVE. FINISHES: A. DRYWALL & DOORS TO BE PAINTED SIMILAR TO EXISTING. VEM= INSTRUCTIONS: ** SPECIAL a9TRU(:TZOli3 lit'. 1. Mail Invoices to Indian River county Sheriff Attn: Accounts Payable 4055 41St Avenue Vero Beach, PL 32960 ,• 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. S. State Tans Exempt 8: state / 85-8012622035C-0 RIM: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Xniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneiresheriff.org Vendor 40 s , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER (W 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 54021 Page:3 of 3 ANY /s{}C$♦::�}'r.(�'.:.t,rah��r/s7]a.�:...r.::.>•'.,r Ly..L'6�L�RXr'.r/r.r S.G..?:r:'_M-S.+hx.{rjYr11a.:`.s�1.;J rY•`fsJL:{_^�:-,�,,o,."!sx�-:�-.F.'+:�ves',Y ivss s;'.0t.r r.,r.j.G.:�:r�:.:l/y.. jrr,.:r_crrJ`l:rl:..,rCt:;:s�r.}'trl,:{r!''+ser.:'s.;�:,,<.•.'<f:J�..�l++:us�.f.4l:/,,:•..`r�.ifi,:l:s:-rf.f r/.Y:''�...G-.;',:..r.py.c'srn.'.f.r.i's•-s'/.�-�sy�a�i.t',1d F:fSX/r1?f...�.fJ:r.YCrk1vyG :'r�.,::/✓:1.f,s.Y•L/lff.Ur:S••:.a.: !::sf;.?yt:::Y1...:fh!i.g•f:��s:.U,.'t'.CirS�J..� V:r1ft:31.:'�o-;,.:�s.•s`•fr.rrGu.�:+.',S'::.'y:G.:y-�-!Hs`'�¢�-?.:ro4:{..W�..�'._�¢/�+,.+:rr_"�l...,.,fY,•�w-riv:1ar{z.;+r:,:y.*:+.:fv�:r/.Ysr'�e.�c. L •j�T•�:,:'.(+':sab's$ :.t..RA . )S. . vE.1'. lc..}.y:: �:t+-'.ryr.,.`�.�:x..Yc.•a:s•`f.:-f:sr.sf:av rCv,•."f:iTs:-C.Y,✓-,::,siSr.: =�,:•<;i.X{ �� 7r/ • .::�r?.ri••r.,tr.;�'.l.?:.Y•-•tr.:u;.f.. r.:.r]•s.Yf!r,..r..'la+.-::r:-.:s::..r.,i5:tfG/>.'r/ l. I . ;t tirryssf �• E 'REyY�, yWUr^Y '_ .-isruG '•lar._ .cS�i- � r CJ. r 1. y '::.,.. '%..:..:., .. ...� •..::rh,r.. ...! _ { _Yom' 1 .:._ r..'i"�71 •ra a. C171aSt. 7. 2' - v ✓ 06/10{13 07110/13 r/ Due Net 3 ,.1.224 MASHER. 13554 .�N� ,., ..-, .rU y r��}Y .,.0 mvs'r b Y� fi j r Y G:"`U+�etz •`stf s.'.,F s 7 :,:-Y•r::r;2�r ry ;, r,... ...-�yc;J-:<r r - . .. ..-:... ....:.:: ...... 7!� k"7,:1.... lY `r- 1J'rV' t .c ,rt •3 r ��.� 8 l:S Nx ,mow,,.- s 1 ACCESSORIES: A. LOUVER, EXHAUST FIRE EXTINGUIS ER PLANS AND SPE' SPECIAL CONSTRIICT - PRE ENGINEERED MET DING SYSTEM: A. PRE-EN' STRUCTURE WILL £ & UTILIZE EXI' ANDABLE B. LDING SYSTEM T IDED WITH STANDAED O PRIMER. L PANELS & TRIM DETA LS MATCH EXISTING. ICAL SYSTEMS: FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM I ASSUMED TO ADEQUATE HYDRAULIC FLOW FOR SYSTEM ADDITION. ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS: A. ELECTRICAL INSTALLED PE PLANS AND SPECS. VENDOR INSWUCTIONS: i. Mail Invoices to Indian River County sheriff '...,... r r �G •'-.�..�:::':=�:>:-:>{=�%:::=::-: Attn: Accounts Payable >•::... 4055 418t Avenue Vero Beach FL 32960 -s:f1: �••is: :;Vii :.:.:-is'-s,' •:,:t{<::ii;`:;i£R:w:`:-%;:i'i';%:t;:<s s<:%:==s:;:<>::<:.;:.r,;:::,.::::.�::::,:,:.:s1`...:..:.::::::.: 2. invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. NO. above. "-"- 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this a order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. S. State Tax Exempt #: State # 85-00126220350-0 BIN: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Kniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneiresheriff.org V`n&r 41 t � INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 54021 Pager 4 of 3 ti��yF-$r� �11W dk•�(;iF'1f�ik r fi / f f � t 'k`SfrdR�Z�`/ lG�`� 'r'z,Fty�`�-3N•�"*Vit, r *•'�}v y• sIN, 0,00,10 LkY�ItL.�+: x y>d } c F.yFII'� r'/'t•_.c' ✓F n: v'fY"<�i/!{Y ��+ �� r�}�c -�F•trh� l.� '�C,Ff�wi' 3c -''r:{�'�`f -rf�r��4i1��` fray a,•s/ic d"t�`r�° Cr, 3 wsk`F"}.0:lf�F Fit'/C..rw`F'7F'v'"•n 't lk+`-a.x `F}� rr SYta r fig F y u.:,aur%S d. <n ty r a -:Y.iJ/:iG::}:y:Yv1 fi+ Y{�I�rTF:'J•'fj5' "r.4ii'^>•r'!'F,..}nWLt:Vo- fi"f .'/r.-:''Y i.N-. Yf".!: .Vim••• 'rf.t- �::.Cfu:en;:d•f:G?: f. .F.L... +:�_:. .use•: _f. nacry• :.Y,: _..r.;., .:i.::.#.: .:{.,: :.t.: a-'� lr �,- $.�}.!!Fr,{` +.•- k,rr.,._.x.•- ../}, a',"X-. i'-!i':ik}:• V'. }'%.td.•�f. .+5: L:.4 ...r .�,��+.f ¢ ':ut f. :}fy} �-k} •}t?.57;:!".:F.} �f.:L } F .:R••h.�SJi, ..�i-,f:: •1•.'Y^,�}}. t :,G'•::::"t� r.;:{.. 'r,.'c#' a- ;}}c.oanfG�`.-rt,.'. FF��tax ..<.,ar. .+..{.,fiv. :..£,•; .-S G. { l:}..-v �nG�F �S:arF•W ::;r! ..%6,:.Y..- f ...<::'-t}_tt:c}:^:YF•};.vi:}:•+:v,i:F.. 1F 'iKli:: _:L•:.n:: F F:•r.•-._: ::r.:>,::'.:;•,:•}+::�-f:::::.• {'y.'i�':`r}�F;3=1?-:.i•v»v*:.4i'3:::;;.:sf.:3..!tv:�'.. yf'y!,f -3}Fc i fi f: F -X S! a F 1. .}p ;•fi;,+rh: ^-ff a'' rte ' 'a'• - a v f f �x s /.' r<.-�S. -. .`�a,�.;. 1. L <.FCJ�+.t •fr�,[m,!-n.�.�;Jf,�J�:�Ol if rx2'• y�/f•�''�r' }-a,tg r } /} / < }}.} F t:} t::: .:::•,`•}`!J:r.Y.�. vc�+yA5%;<'r foY3ayw°Y:.yF''Y.- �,a�,,./ r 1 r ra•.' � a ai. :.._.,.r•-rx:r:.uy+�:'.� ... - r- a-F.. .- -, d ,3Z. r r- F ;G '. i s•��. -<:o: ma"•;;:.,':.-+f;FR'rlf.e- 'F:?s�uL• .f'.J�:>. �efi-. .�:f} �s.. .._t ::: ...�!Yw4�....:—,ffJ. .�n`•sfi....g-.�sa°a jt �.. r`...r F.:.,a•..... ;Yl&'i/ r....... �i`-'F_za 3rt.�._,� r.� "xt.r_.!.r/ofi�Cllf�---• ..-"a} ' '.....,z YF:''r„.�11�D�'+�e+C.•}'!.•.v ...:,.,...:...:_''. 06/10/13 07/10/13 Due Net 3 001 %t F 'o-Fri""`<fyj!''ti'r r1n.., '! .t .?t .£.cy j' xy�.a.,talc-ar ur �•s:..., i .s t �!R"h}}atc:@aS',v'-''v'+c: .c`l.•yxx/'�'I:,:ap��(�I' O+r�-:� -�s�f '�X}f.,l),f�l�uL�,twt... r�`sr><F..::,;.�/Fi. -,N :'7.c:-....irr< � "..�.-yr -f+oy. MAS LM2Z4-1 -H51404607 7T2 et. W1)e�cn'p0i1 5 mow AS PER MILTON CONS, Dal PROPOSAL FOR CONS. SERVICES LETTER DA JUNE 5, 2013. ** TOTAL ** 129,055. 00 VENDOR INSTRECnONS: *•SPEC3A+ NSTRIICT3QN3 *+ i. Mail invoices to Indian River County Sheriff Attn: Accounts Payable :::- . 4055 41st Avenue ' ` Vero Beach, FL 32960 • f 2. Invoices and Packages east bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. 5. State Tax Exempt #: State 185-80126220350-0 EIN: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Rniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneiresheriff.org VeW°r 42 BUILDING DIVISION CUNCO, INC 5550 41" STREET * VERO BEACH, FL 32967 * (772) 562-8814 * FAX (772) 562-0173 cathcoinc@bellsouth.net Date: June 6, 2013 To: Indian River County Sheriff 4055 41"Ave Vero Beach,FL 32960 Proposal For: IRC Jail Warehouse Expansion Vero Beach, Florida We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials for the following: Warehouse Expansion Building Proposal 1. Milton Construction $ 129,055.00 2. Summit Construction Management, Inc. $ 134,000.00 3. RF Concrete Construction, Inc. $ 154,000.00 Site Work 1. Sidewalk Demolition $ 330.00 2. Fence Removal and Replacement $ 853.00 3. Building Pad Grading & Compaction $ 905.00 4. Raise Storm Structure $ 600.00 5. Concrete Sidewalks $ 265.00 6. Final Grading $ 275.00 Site Work Total $ 3,228.00 NOTES: 1. Price is Valid for Work to be Completed by September 2013, Cathco Inc. to be Compensated for Cost Increases Beyond that Date. 2. Concrete Sidewalk Cost is Based on Additional Quantity To PO #53265. 3. No Change To Asphalt Quantity and Cost Per PO #53610. This proposal subject to acceptance within 30 days and is void ther rat the option of the undersigned. Approved Signature M tthew S. ffsert Vice President 43 MILTON C 0 N S T R U C T 1 0 N (W PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES June 5,2013 Cathco, Inc. 5550 41St Street Vero Beach, Florida 32967 RE: Indian River County Jail Warehouse Addition Bid Documents: • A2.10 through A6.20 Donadio and Associates dated 5-17-2013 • S-1 through S-2 ML Engineering dated 5-17-2013 • M0.1 through M2.1 Kamm Consulting dated 5-17-2013 • E0.1 through E3.1 Kamm Consulting dated 5-17-2013 • FS0.1 through FS2.1 Kamm Consulting dated 5-17-2013 • Project Manual Donadio and Associates dated 5-17-2013 We hereby propose to construct the building portion of this project per the plans and specifications listed above for a total of$129,055.00(one hundred twenty nine thousand and fifty five dollars) With the following clarifications: GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Permit fees are included 2. Impact fees are excluded (W 3. Layout and formboard survey are included 4. Soil compaction testing and concrete testing are included 5. Progress and final cleanup are included SITEWORK 1. All site improvements have been excluded from this proposal,including: a. Stripping,grading,compaction b. Final grade, landscaping,sod,irrigation c. Aprons or paving d. Fencing CONCRETE 1. Installed per plans and specifications—no changes to foundations are proposed STEEL AND MISC METALS 1. Interior column included with standard primer THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 1. Wall and roof insulation per plan and wall section—VRV facing DOORS AND WINDOWS 1. Roll Up doors to match existing 2. New doors to be re-keyed per owner's directive (W Milton Construction and Consulting,LLC 1933o Sea Grape Drive Vero Beach,FL 32963 (772)485-8607 Fax(772)202-7050 FL CBC1250138 www.m iltonconstruction.com building construction facilities consulting project management 44 Indian River County Jail Warehouse Expansion page 2 FINISHES 1. Drywall and doors to be painted similar to existing ACCESSORIES 1. Louver,exhaust fan,and fire extinguishers per plans and specs SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION—PRE ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING SYSTEM 1. Pre-Engineered Structure will tie in and utilize existing expandable endwall frame 2. Metal Building system to be provided with standard shop primer 3. Wall panels and trim details to match existing MECHANICAL SYSTEMS 4. Fire sprinkler system is assumed to adequate hydraulic flow for system addition ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS 1. Electrical installed per plans and specs Respectfully Submitted, a a n David C.Milton (W Owner/Managing Member Milton Construction and Consulting,LLC 19330 Sea Grape Drive Vero Beach,FL 32963 (772)485-8607 Fax(772)202-7050 FL CBC1250138 www.nii[tonconstruction.com building construction facilities consulting project management 45 Summit Construction Management, Inc. CGC058845 2837 Flight Safety Drive,Vero Beach,FL 32960 Proposal for the IRC Jail Warehouse :Expansion Project June 6, 2013 Cathco Attn: Mike Eisert 5550 41St St Vero Beach, FI 32960 Martha; Summit Construction is pleased to provide this proposal for the expansion of the existing IRC Jail Warehouse as detailed on plans by Donadio &Associates, Architects dated May 17, 2013. (W See the following pages for bid qualifications Total Build of Expansion per plans/specs $134,000.00 Please review this proposal and contact with any questions. Sincerely, Brad Schuh, President Phone(772)794.2099 WN•N.SUt1ll711tCIIl.ntt Fax(772)794-2097 46 OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS Division 1 General Conditions The project, in general, consists of the construction of work as described herein Design and engineering— by Donadio &Assoc. Architects Construction & Project Management—performed by Summit Construction Management: • Supervision and project management as required • Scheduling and quality control • Progress meetings, progress scheduling, payment applications, etc. • All punch list and warranty services, as per contract • Procurement of materials and services only to LOCAL, subcontractors/vendors • Security and safety during construction operations Costs for Construction Work Include: • Construction workers, site superintendent, and project manager • General conditions include field supervision, dumpsters, temporary protection, small tools, common labor,temporary fencing/signage, temporary toilets, soil/concrete testing, final cleaning, equipment rentals • Receive and unload materials • All direct subcontracted material, labor and equipment • Costs for insurances and benefits of on-site staff • Rental of materials, supplies and equipment for mobilization and construction • Standard liability and Work Comp Insurance included (No Builder's Risk, can be added at additional cost) • No Bonds included (can be added if desired at additional cost) • No impact fees or utility connection fees included • IRC building permits (with required five sets of signed/sealed plans by Donadio &Assoc.) • Sales and use taxes • Temporary water and electric to be provided by owner • Cost of plan reproduction and mailings • Standard monthly AIA billing with 10% retainage withheld All change orders will include a 15%Contractors Fee Phone(772)79"-2099 au-wsuruuitcm.ner Fax(772)794-2097 47 Division 2 Site work& Demolition ■ Sitework by others ■ Fencing and removal of fencing by others ■ Demolition of existing metal building as required to add new openings ■ Driveway as indicated c Division 3 U Concrete and Masonry ■ Concrete slab as indicated ■ Concrete driveways,sidewalks and door stoops by others (W .; Division 5 Metals ■ Steel column to reinforce new partition t Division 6 Carpentry ■ NIC (W Phone(773)794.2099 Fax(772)794-2097 48 e Division 7 Roofing & Insulation ■ Metal building insulation as indicated on plans ■ No batt insulation indicated within new interior wall partition Division 8 Windows& Doors ■ Three hollow metal frames with hollow metal doors and required door hardware, impact rated as required ■ Roll up doors with motor operators as indicated for opening 101 (insulated, 65 PSF) and 102 (non insulated, no impact) (W Division 9 Finishes ■ Interior metal stud partition with 5/8" drywall ■ Painting of drywall partition and three hollow metal frames/doors ■ No Flooring or concrete sealer as none are indicated Phone(772)794.7099 www.sunuuirrnu.net Fax(772)794-2097 49 Division 10 thru 14 Specialties, Equipment and Furnishings ■ Pre engineered metal building by American Buildings ■ Fire extinguishers as indicated per code } Division 15 Plumbing, HVAC& Electrical PLUMBING ■ No Plumbing HVAC SYSTEM ■ Provide new exhaust fan and louver as indicated FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM ■ Provide additional fire sprinkler protection as indicated. Including separate IRC permit as required ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Electric per plan Phone(772)794-2099 Anna-m un"1"tC11 net F•ax(772)794-2097 50 f ., PROPOSAL RF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. Box 650789, Vero Beach, Florida 32965 (W 664 Old Dixie Highway, Vero Beach, Florida 32962 Phone: 772-567-3356/Fax: 772-567-3263 Proposal Submitted To Phone Date Cathco, Inc. 562-8814 June 6, 2013 Street Job Name 5550 41St Street IRC Jail Warehouse Expansion City, State and Zip Job Location Proposal#1 Vero Beach, Florida 32967 Vero Beach, Florida Attn: Fax: Email: Mike Eisert cathcoinc@bellsouth.net We hereby submit an estimate for labor and material to complete the following: GENERAL CONDITIONS: • Permits • Supervision • Safety • Items necessary to meet Division 1 requirements BUILDING CONCRETE: (W • Continuous footings • Pad footings • Termite pre-treat • Slab-on-grade: 5"with #4 wire, Emil vapor barrier • Anchor bolts • Drill and epoxy#5 @ 24" o/c at old slab PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING BY AMERICAN BUILDINGS: • Demolition of existing metal building • Provide and erect new building addition • Building size: 68'x25'xl6' eave height • Provide and install 4" R-13 wall insulation • Provide and install 6" R-19 roof insulation • Provide and install hollow metal door frames and doors with hardware, per plans • Provide and install roll-up doors and motor operators • Provide and install walk doors • Provide and install windows • Provide exhaust fans and louvers • Fire extinguishers • Additional sprinkler system (W IRC Jail Warehouse Expansion I Proposal 51 � t • Interior partitions and drywall • Painting of drywall • Electrical, per plans • Anchor bolts • Pre-engineered metal buildings drawings TOTAL: $154,000.00 NOTINCLUDED • Design and engineering • Bonding • Impact fees • Testing of soil, density and concrete by Owner • Fencing and removal of existing fence • Waterproofing • Floor finishes or concrete sealer • Site concrete • Sitework • Plumbing, A/C ****Prices are good for 30 days**** PAYMENT SCHEDULE: Invoices due 10 days after date of invoice. All past due amounts are subject to 2% per month late charge. All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. All work is to be completed in a workmanlike manner. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra Co sts will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. iis proposal is subject to acceptance within 30 days and is void thereafter at the option of the undersigned. RF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Authorized Signature: ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL: The above prices, specifications and conditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: SIGNATURE: L IRC Jail Warehouse Expansion 2 Proposal 52 MIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 54019 Page: 1 of 1 "Do gxl�' 15 �:tkfERTt3� �r f: Y �{�,�DER sS E l01 i 8L NETS►1I+�RK t 1�1 j i rt-ITS' rfj rf y. c cr?nz �... c '.7 ,�}fE� � � Y' ifr ar*-.G r,�f�+r r 3 .c r r .c- .!�frxy r c,:ry r .f.Kar�r n c c e s rKr f { C� Ar,1 tf�� r 1 r/! rlr '<>} r1 3 •."ll�� :> tkvr -�` rk'rGfi•:lf,�v .;:Yr.-s:}r•;nx .1:,l./nr,f r.-` :•::r -s.e, ''f:> �' S y 3?: t c 9 - r � ry � r. �{ .t�.:•:c.�f{t'l.-:.r r z:.r{'rain ,3r1:..:-a•.Y,B'r. 1w a;Sr�F.'.c:.>:.. Zi .cr f c �srir.'/E�. tri rr _y>tg... ,{:a._,.< .c h;�w'G.z.:r-.dy J� lf!/a:"''lca:�f-:: �E%.ifc:: � rr �r..ty`�//�' � '1..� � f r-.L:.:fa....s,, •v ♦: a5 fe 3"""'x `�' ft z.fs;(-;r-rr:-•: ]L" %a /o'. r.<--{:?y}Y �., r. HY.w o r r t y / 1 .. n ^c�, 'f �.�!�`.€'rf?1} v.� �., 'v.}1�::1r:.r'.`bl+f•'rJ.a.:•'r'rfwc.�:r'!� h;h' Yl�s�"-£-�.s.!',., 1„� "r >r"r v -:,r.tcr.r o2 •l' r i.:re tr}By�S'�,�-�:^?9 .fyr r r ,..r �:� r .,.>�` ° £?'_'r .! .o f! .ir�l`s ,rj'` rJicff ,c K n� z i.•3r�3_.:rs=X-owSyr-'`� .{:S:,'"-f-yri'ay +"!.•� f.:..:4. ..;.k.`o: r ..3 yy ,z,` .fir r Sr B fr}.. q# n z s Ya`6.'ok,% {•''�fi =4 m';"L :�s ,/�: a✓ cfsfr +rAcra'd a •r`xr. j¢f `}Frry r r r'�Yi.'cwlrYrc�3n#u4 y l E ry.�o f lr" ':<4'•-a,cw,�r h�� r < 4 .�r�'!r`"`'1 .M r syr��n•, `'"-'�+r�' �"%� :-. 2�!;}Y r...� y •� .�,u�: �"r,l�!�.. r YJsr rf";. :e `� } s n fiir } ::rye.3v, •f#. cY '!ry .{ay:3t h ,1 of rr,s Jl._:ie v r. k r✓ f �^ r c r r r �, _�f 3l r'+�.?�i�:2-ml � .::..:......... ....:..;C., ............;P"f �. l..,fr- ...4nr:it ,z�{rri.YSrr...:.5�:... ll.'F"r..'.t'l,. y YL..lr#,l ...2. 9' /:7.'.{;.� !.!`!?,+< � .rr..r..? '.•. .. `..rr.;,.. r ` n r,F y.,r...- .G ✓-..: Yy •vF 'Y�' d;,c �: f`i' 3rsy ^:•rr »Y•+,>w : S .._... •:a. `,{:,_ x. ......v...., r�! ^ #7t`r?6i,/,.r6.c•/... k.k S$-0'.��..�r. .1.. r� .d..:. ..e.;e--"t d ..:. ! u. 06/101.13 07110/13 BEST DM Due Net 3 :b .. •.. os -.Sw c-u E u y a...., y "r` .jam .. x r lyrr- lslw� 3arr. s> w hf' .i r r .. 28153-1 77213Ss9-7�.7 ` '3'n�q'� <�/�,,a Ski• .>. .,.. 'r?o-�l��J�rA.`_s'%fi�r � ,.a�'�.' 7�4' ��/r if`+r ..�•-..•�j..'i..�!�:. _ ..f. l 1.00 EA CORRECTIONS DIV. INIPROUE 750.0000 750.00 G/L# 168600521; , Our Stock#900-350-010-0000 AS FOLLOWS: A. DETERMINE PAT A TERMINATION P S FOR CABLE COI�ITR SALLY PORT OUTS.ID ERCOM. B. PULL nMEX TING. INTER M E FROM -N CAMERA RCOM T ABOVE INTAKE BRING INTO NE CABLE N. INAT"ON ROOM. OSS-CONNECT ANALOG -LEPHONE LINE FROM ADM PHONE ROOM TO INTERCOM TERMINATION. CROSS-CONNECT DEDICATED TELEPHONE EXTENSION FOR GATES TO "A" CONTROL. INSTALL PHONE. AS PER QUOTE #7822 DATED 5/14/2013 . VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: SPEC1AfsSTIIRiS srY i. Mail invoices to Indian River County Sheriff Attn: Accounts Payable 4055 41st Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 2. invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this a order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. S. State Tax Exempt 8: State f OS-80126220350-0 SIN: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Bniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeMircoheriff.org vefw" 53 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER (W 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 54019 Page:2 of 1 ........_.........,.. .:r.,.4 . ......:_,,<r.-,.3•: X•rff:. -.,:r..... ...:.........: . ... :..:. .<u Jr. ..F..-.....v....S.... HvX _vt_ {'-. .l: .f. ..�.}..::v : h....-.4.:.4:.:_ F..:y:.:......r.,�. ham':h ./'i X v nfx :� �,- :r/rl.i.:{r!%..'•YlJr�r'rlrlf�.Y-:•:r 4rJ.-<f:i%4r 4:: :4'f:r 4..�:: G ra s� �ti4ljr• .f•; MEN y� / Mr :hXry 4r : :?nr i}e.fi { :./-<ry'':rfir'i:��•: pf,.,.,j' ,":?�'r/fit-r:.:<;'S^�'ii•:..r3:..;£ c:<- .v. _t;yxl -* ..-'�7::•./..•.s:•: t ..?-�?l'�AA>'S.4� r� �f� r-f A,. 4 r/y<•ir:�.X y�.X.fi-: :�.�:n.. "F. v," � _J�i� } xs hj:fXG/or*rY4.L g5Y<'f /X•:y%$ grtr,Lyy,-,w,-1Mr:PIX } f 4 Xlvt fMY:< r rf - ! X-.>-X X fi:' - � :•- ''r ;� r* �.:rf,,'Xr }flv r}r yXYray. '•rnvrf i<'•%ro• rc n c t,:rf 4 ,(J� 3 4 F ,X' rX r.�. J'f �':G:l:.•: S v}M I�G/r"}'/-f�yL•t(-},�-.G f }y. {, +c:J� :"�..: rL'W�� •r � ?S `< t �'�'71MI �h tst��};<��>�f/� � " •�v, -�r_'. � <y.> Izf� q rye:y FY < � S J'�v c!'f <>r <r �S'i'£ ,6 :.•s}yx v n'•£} O.S.'♦ sr }� s^ �,�v., F +.Y } - ,vj � •'Crr•f 'H•N �.f JAI�¢p f'{ :Z � f Z- � �y�. �g "`��}" ..:5' -X f _ >4 < s ! } �9^' Hf�! < o��f?'rr.3.rr"-GX�X.faY:�'�C - F � ,� 3',a��'��r^'7.:L, E ��7`�'�rr'�".� ✓rf.2" "' ?�'k S S S ? G vt tY"y L} Y{`{tf/�< <NY 'xf�.ha},.PJX 'i1<:•yr.:.y}twtlL^'+34.�}cy E��r� ,f FY rr rJ.£ u}ti.F` �43 tr�Cr _ 2' f.. �:;�' : <. { t f #fXr.'-X- F,S,t x�.:y-��}-Y>rX r'. '>�-• rr :r<yir. .�` Y<'}+J. 4{ eL^. �}`-- `4•'r-4,� yf J.+ !�} E. r < f � F r"5�•frt:r{�1..YX �S.••+<r.X{(' x3,<s' _f r,.X4r'f .V3a X & ;��i<r'{r J 4.v:r .c�� 1 �' r�r ;Sh �r'I:-Y-..XJi:�i .H }. od: r:•. '; ':'t„-.f'{rX' ax 3F._S.Yf;nf..•.-,.:. ? X h 4 r�'•f.$:..c r••t: h.:< ��'btfJ'-�:X,.�.�{,y,i� ?Y:::..:: G �, E gJ ,i .{ _�_-Ey <:fv,:f:..+�r/:.>_•'•a.{4: a-� 'J<Nr a••,J{.f J. �rr?•. l{Y�•. •`r- _�•....:. +:i rv. :' ;•r.s 4•.:-.;:r,;F:! fr� cf�.r,. Vjy�Sf�<r �Jr�'}i�',�/.rr yX ...•�•y> 'I :r 7J}f�f•!�".�y. + , r :- Y r::>�.-:} F�J--Hit•-� r$'r:-ri�'- F;ff��4.. •�fi f::�r f�:Ylvv -�9rf1L.�r{��s}�+/rr}•'r�"•l,,, �34+r ir��J��j%�'Y•r.��:'. •: a rt.:.:-,v..;?fr.. .t�J�'`r,� •:�'•.-�-r�''�y- a�-':;�',�,r;,� tra:�..�r�.�.�K.LaE.• {:<'f.+?a:.a.✓.1Fj.s:,'iJ.4�r��<� .. Jr-:::-....:a .... ..... ., v:•:rr.ii }S}}fir} VhR r.arY[3� own _ t, '�, :rff••..fLv.4Y r•, r....rrl 4ny< r0' S% vYX X4$ lam e5 ?} cf f•! 1cX. ' dr$ 1 .. ./ fkX r6�6i ? / •'.A'. } r� i . ::...... :: ..., ,F.r..::v'Xn. X. r:,.f# r. - •�..Xir ..:_ ,. - .. ..ri.r.._ ..:..... 06110M 07/10/13 13ESTDEST Due Me,34 ": ...>x } -4. yr r._ ,,.-..{ `3'{v� y Jy N . ?�r rXt rt r-ta- •{a. {�'k'-'r`�.fyyGG>4- w?�y`/r r� v. y - 1`81n0��i� -...:. z..- ��J•^ . '�t{1c,:. f. <. `'�`$ o�R�fl �: � �;>..!ire {�.SL;,. . <-,� ,.y4r .n.. :r r 1LQQ 2W-n_1 M1-35947&7;. •�fa �2uann Y . 4 tir,�,-'�---. _...�., _ .PSP•-- . ... .-r.. r_,>... a:3, < ** TOTAL ** 750. 00 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: ** SPBCiAfir YNSTRLCTI01�3 akxf i. Mail invoices to Indian River County Sheriff Attn: Accounts Payable 4055 41st Avenue ` ✓, ; Vero Beach, FL 32960 2. invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. e 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, y� prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. 5. State Tax Exempt #: State # 85-801262203SC-0 EIN: 59-6000677 Huye- 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Kniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffen*iresheriff.org Vendor 54 Business Telephone&Network Quote (W 5654 Sunberry Cir. Date Quote# Fort Pierce, FL. 34951 5/14/2013 7822 772 359 7677 Description Rate Qty Amount Determine pathway and termination points for cable controlling sally port outside intercom 50.00 8 400.00 Pull back existing intercom cable from termination in camera room to ceiling above Intake lobby and bring into telephone cable termination room 50.00 3 150.00 Cross-connect analog telephone line from admin phone room to intercom termination Cross-connect dedicated telephone extension for gates to A control Install phone 50.00 4 200.00 Total $750.00 (W 55 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER. 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER, 53993 Page: 1 of 1 4 }x � °�� rY'•4 X .t.�: p� i•� r ri ,.L.r [ >. `L!-y?, .t r ,L 1"•{0 f �,. > 3 r �kr ri,'`�a }. r'+ Ff rM1 Y v. Yn *c � x�r.. �•� � c � v r } -•�,.� L -;. a..`r`x�sr/y;iy, v+ '•• N.`C: V:h'ai;iil fir. w y �s ,x'>. ,y, •A�•,{�.r' rr; - ,� .• ^ � >. y �•'srh�y - } p .� )� p ?fr „Jyi }.±��ir T. °''✓�. k �s rX � i�'� r : -.'�w"';3:�"•��-f }�}, rp�> � /r r,Ei a of t -#.`7 11' �.'�" f 2� <r-.tr ;:, C- ,•• r'Fg 1sr z o-� -. >�:'r �.�,- �2•ti .Ram x ,��,°.•�¢s'+�s�.•'s�r{>:>, �: �.3 .n,�t£ �:''<'" 'C`�• .E• 6or' �L , s R � UM 044f13 .. 07/03113: BE§rr' 1. NEAT D.Ue 1 1. 00 'EA CORRECTIONS DTV, - ' ' 9,200.0-000 9, 200'.' 00 GIL# 168600521 0 Our StOck#k90.0:350-010-0000 PHASE I'I CONSTRUCTION DRA: A. ARCHITEC GINE'RI G SERVICES B. COST CONSUL T' C. FIRE CZ' AS PER. & ASSOCIATES LETT RECTOR. ASHER DA ED 5/2/ ** TOTAL ** 9, 200.00 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: xrYr" �' x < a we 1. Mail Invoices to Indian River County Sheriff ' +' r,r ..l /., Attn: Accounts Payable ;>;'_ * ';,i<'•?:r 4055. 41St Avenue :y.;.• '�.' •. - a Vero Beach, FL 32960 y f .:s -•' •. .r ' l-± u''r �' 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. `L-a-r•. rr..'< ..;.....:. >•..>:!..::.:=::L-: .; •r`�3F::.,,>...:;,::x;n:#>:,y,.;;.v: ,;4sf.,< , 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this g a order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. 5. State Tax Exempt #i State # 85-801262203.5C-0 BIN: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Kniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffenoirceheriff.org Vendor 56 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER (W 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772129.9-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 53994 Page: 1 of 1 F In:{;::• W.4^r;r'1;:N.::H.x{•}'N.tr}:�.<^F%•:w{•�Y r.•{ .::O:i+G. •{.'.v;ir<:nvn..:} G a� - r.{.. <r.*fJ-i vr.( t ko- -r•'?{ux;Y}..yr. rs,tt r, r 7 th't }•" hr 4}G 'c : Ytr' f }i. r r d r• > .+4'x/`R44� } �. 'L+y; }{Tj sr•'y.}- < S ✓.+ 7fCr F'�ta y',, ',�-$��{3ttry�}r ,�htt}f ♦t� � < x I i <S �.. c fir•- � r 7 rr o.� r t a�t t•G 1 y.j.�,t � � 2 � Y�,,t.� }S ti a Gyp fi y y r tea Si. { y ; < } I <�a�`hL�g .7. �•� ttfi �� t��'t '�� g M1 9 tr. ��' i�4 AF5 t+N�Y�; k � �4ct o �t < g�G �F�T a .{2 �a?�f••�,t, �`:, @,��rz z �'r tr r 4 :.� _ iz � 1 <' � �� +��t-•,?- '• G�'ny�;' '"�ff�y+�`ytrr, �•w h' t rs. +£ r. k i # ¢�`rr �y:� ��1� ,�-� r Y v 5,;r y''. �. c •Ax' .-'. �{ t?�'r�,,G�T{✓2. �r • a ;Sv' r S a rGi 6 9M Nffffm r.. 061,04113 f, 0.7/03113 BEST D.EST T?ue Nef. ib. 31 • � .- Y 'ryF. } is g'}. : YF 1 1.00 EA CORRECTIONS DIV. -TMPRQ'':` 6, 8;25 .Q000 6,825.00 G/L#k 16860U521 Our Stock#900-350-010-0000 PHASE IZI• A. ARCHITECTURAL. Ili G. SERVICES B. CIVIL ENGI AS PER DONJMQ & SOCIATES LETTER TO I TOR ASHER DA D. 5/2/13. ** TOTAL ** 6, 825.00 oe :r;:.rY},} "-Y3�'}':GSOA.r?:Cr .Yat:;ttb'.int.'7rtyv:2;4<:;CR"S;t'•'yi.-"f Fisc},}.Gr}s,'fri;::; VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: tr,-•},':..,..... >'' /r;:.r}{G r`.mr�• •'• .. T.. $s#i�. : 7 'r hz�'?%::<"<. o- %'r.^:iyv'Wry'i'•: ir-r.{<jt:.'irj�''•'.-••':'I'v{I?,:.'`-.�:.ihYi�"ry?Yi:J•:'$�iK{�.MT^'. •...........::.. 1. Mail Invoices to Indian River County Sheriff x•� � a„r rp. G � � :� } t}� �� '�` :'•'f`r•.'.::¢`f t r/ 'S's G�f r`G r >riai ,u .0 `frI z� } rr { f. ' Attn: Accounts Payable 4055 41st Avenue .,.ry. Vero Beach, FL 32960 SS?:u•r ,,,�- r r<rG 42+ f r} <3`..+:" rt 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this a p order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, (W prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. S. State Tax Exempt #: State # 85-801262203SC-0 BIN: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Kniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneiresheriff.org Vendor 57 I 1 l (W D O N A D I O &Associates,Architects,P.A. May 02,2013 Mrs. Martha Asher Director of Support Services Indian River County Sheriff's Office 4055 41"Avenue Vero Beach,Florida 32960-1802 RE: ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROPOSAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FENCE WALL/PAVING/WAREHOUSE EXPANSION VERO BEACH,FLORIDA ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO.2013.01.1.2 (W Dear Mrs.Asher, Within the content of this letter is a Proposal for Architectural/Engineering Services for Fencing&Wall Improvements, Site Paving Expansion and a new single story+/- 1,700 square foot Warehouse Building Expansion to the West end of the existing Sherif0ail Warehouse Facility all located at 41 s' Avenue on the existing Indian River County Jail Site in Vero Beach,Florida. The Fee for Architectural/Engineering Services shall be a lump sum Fee of Thirty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty-Fifty Dollars ($34,925.00). This Fee shall include Basic Services for Architectural, Structural Engineering, Mechanical & Electrical Engineering and Additional Services for Civil Engineering,Surveying,Fire Protection and Cost Consultant Services. The Architectural/Engineering Services Lump Sum Fee is broken into three(3)Phases as follows: Phase I:Site Plan Approval Documents Architectural/Engineering Services -$3.750.00 Civil Engineering---------------------------------------------------------------------$9,350.00 SurveyUpdate $5,800.00 Total Fee $18,900.00 Phase H: Construction Drawings Architectural/Engineering Services--------------------------------------------$5,200.00 Cost Consultant........................................................... $ 1,500.00 Fire Protection. $2,500.00 .. .. .............................. Total Fee $9,200.00 (W 609 17''Street Vero Beach,Florida 32960 Phone 772 794 2929 Fax 772 562 8600 Email daa@donadio-arch.com License No.AA0002238 58 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROPOSAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FENCE/WALL/PAVING/WAREHOUSE EXPANSION May 02,2013 PROJECT NO.2013.01.1.2 Page 2 Phase III: Construction Administration Architectural/Engineering Services -----$3,800.00 --------------------------------------- Civil Engineering $3,025.00 Total Fee $6,825.00 The above Fees are based on the scope of work as required to Design,Permit and Construct the Fencing &Wall Improvements, Site Paving Expansion and Warehouse Addition.In addition to the above Basic Architectural and Engineering Fees the following is a summary of work for the Additional Services Fees addressed above: 1. Civil Engineering—See Attachment"A". 2. Surveying-See Attachment"A". 3. Cost Consultant—Preparation of construction cost estimates to establish project cost and for each Phase of the Design as stated below. 4. Fire Protection—Engineering services to design the extension of the existing fire protection system within the new Warehouse Addition. SCOPE OF SERVICES This proposal is based upon the provision of the following Scope of Services: L SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE The Architect shall assist the Owner in establishing the program and ascertain the requirements of the project and shall arrive at a mutual understanding of such requirements with the Owner. Based on this understanding the Architect shall prepare Schematic Design Documents consisting of drawings,outline specifications and a preliminary cost estimate. H. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PHASE Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents and any adjustments authorized by the Owner in the program schedule or construction budget, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Design Development Documents consisting of drawings and other documents to fix and describe the size and character of the project as to Architectural, Structural, Mechanical and Electrical systems, materials and such other elements as may be appropriate. The Architect shall advise the Owner of any adjustments to the preliminary estimate of Construction Cost. III. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE Based on the approved Design Development Documents and any further adjustments in the scope or quality of the project or in the construction budget authorized by the Owner,the Architect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Construction Documents consisting of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project. IV. BIDDING AND NEGOTIATION PHASE—Not Included & Associates, Architects, P.A. 59 I ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROPOSAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FENCEIWALL/PAVING/WAREHOUSE EXPANSION May 02,2013 PROJECT NO.2013.01.1.2 (W Page 3 V. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT The Architect's responsibility to provide Basic Services for the Construction Phase under this Agreement commences with the award of the contract for construction and terminates at the issuance to the Owner of the final Certificate for Payment or 60 days after the date of Substantial Completion of the Work,whichever comes first. The Architect shall provide periodic Site Observations, Review of Contractor's Applications for Payment, Contractors request for information and/or clarifications, Shop Drawing Reviews, Review of Change Order and decisions on any claims or disputes. VI. FEE PAYMENT SCHEDULE A. The fee is based upon our understanding of the stated goals and upon completion of the Phased Services described above. Reimbursable expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic Services and include expenses incurred by the Architect,in the interest of the project. Such expenses include,but are not necessarily limited to the cost of reproduction, postage, long-distance communication and facsimiles, photographs and mileage. Reimbursable expenses will be billed at actual cost. Estimated Cost of Reimbursables is a maximum not to exceed amount of Three Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($3,500.00). (W B. Progress billings will be made monthly based upon the percentage of completion of each phase of the project as of the date of the invoice. Payment is due upon receipt of the invoice. Invoices not paid within thirty(30)days of invoice date will be subject to a finance charge of one and one-half percent(1.5%)per month. C. Should the scope of the project change substantially, the fee will be altered accordingly, based upon Owner approval. Such work will be billed at the hourly rates specified below, for the time involved. No additional work will be initiated without Owner written authorization. D. Donadio&Associates,Architects,P.A. Standard Hourly Billing Rates are as follows: Principal $200.00 Senior Project Manager $175.00 Project Manager $135.00 CADD Manager $135.00 CADD Technician I $100.00 CADD Technician II $ 90.00 CADD Technician III $ 85.00 Intern Architect $100.00 Office Manager $ 85.00 Administrative Assistant $ 65.00 Receptionist $ 60.00 Technical Support $ 55.00 (W D O N A D I O & Associates, Architects, P.A. 60 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROPOSAL INDIAN RrVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FENCE/WALL/PAVING/WAREHOUSE EXPANSION May 02,2013 PROJECT NO.2013.01.1.2 (W Page 4 E. If the project is abandoned or terminated before completion, owner will be invoiced for the services performed, together with the reimbursable expenses incurred, as of the date of termination. F. Should any questions arise regarding an invoice or any portion there of,this office should be contacted immediately. Payment for the amount in question may be withheld. However, timely payment of the balance is required. G. Payment for services performed is in no way based upon the receipt of regulatory approvals or project financing. H. This Proposal is valid for 30 days from the date shown hereon and represents the entire understanding between Parties with respect to the referenced Project and may only be modified in writing. VII. GENERAL A. Illustrative renderings or models are not part of the Basic Services. B. Geotechnical Reports, Off Site Road Way Improvements, Consumptive Use Permitting, Environmental Surveys, As-built Surveys, NPDES General Permit Requirements, New Traffic Analyses, Wetlands/Endangered Species Studies/Mitigation Design Environmental Permitting,Engineering Full Time On Site Representation,Re-Zoning,Permit Application Fees, Building Permit Fees and any other Application Fees for Agency approvals are not (W part of the Basic Services. C. Permitting included within this proposal: 1. Indian River County Major Site Plan application 2. Indian River County Land Clearing Permit 3. Indian River County Tree Removal Permit(if required) 4. Indian River County Type A Stormwater Permit Modification 5. St.Johns River WMD ERP Modification D. All drawings, specifications and other documents prepared for this project are for use solely with this project and unless otherwise provided Donadio &Associates, Architects, P.A.are the author and owner and retain all lawful copyrights to such documents. D o N A D 1 O &Associates,Architects, P.A. 61 ARCHITEC-FURAL/ENGINEERING PROPOSAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FENCE/WALUPAVINGIWAREHOUSE EXPANSION May 02,2013 PROJECT N4D.2013.01.1.2 (W Page 7 Full-time resident construction observation is not required and therefore not included in this proposal. Upoin completion of construction,the Engineer of Record must be provided with As-Built surveys o onfirm proper horizontal and vertical alignment of constructed stormwater, pedestrian walks, and pavingsystems well as the structure expansion. The As-Built survey must be provided by the Contractor's Surveyor(licensed in the State of Florida)and must be provided in AutoCAD format and black line format with reference to State Plane Coordinates as required by Indian River County. While reviewing the As-Built survey, the Engineer shall conduct an initial walk-through and develop a punchlist of construction deficiencies. The punchlist shall be provided to the contractor and the client. Once the contractor has satisfactorily corrected the punchlist items and the Engineer is confident that the site has been constructed in compliance with the permit approvals, and the Engineer is provided with all required information,a Certification of Construction Completion shall be submitted to Indian River County and request final inspection. In the event the County prepares a punchlist,the Engineer will provide said punchlist to the Contractor in order that the items may be addressed. Once the County's punchlist has been resolved to the Engineer's satisfaction, the County shall be notified that the site is ready for re-inspection. Daily and Periodic inspections of erosion control devices and reports required by the NPDES General Permit are the Responsibility of the Contractor and are not included in this proposal. Task G-Engineering Certifications: Upon completion of wastewater,stormwater,potable water and paving systems and review of As-Built and Testing results to confirm proper construction,the Engineer shall prepare Engineering Certifications to be submitted to the following agencies: 1. Indian River County Planning Department Department 2. Indian River County Engineering De p (W 3. Indian River County Traffic Department 4. Indian River County Health Department 5. St.Johns River Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit (W D O N A D I O & Associates,Architects, P.A. 62 ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROPOSAL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE FENCE/WALL/PAVING/WAREHOUSE EXPANSION May 02,2013 PROJECT NO.2011,01,11 Page 6 Prepare site stormwater grading and drainage improvement modifications to support this project. Plans will depict the finished floor elevation for the warehouse expansion, as well as grades for all paving, pedestrian walks, wall foundations, and drainage features. As a result of the newly planned warehouse, existing stormwater management systems will need to be modified to support this project. It is understood that no water and/or wastewater improvements are needed to support this project. Also, it is understood that fire protection for the 1,700 sf warehouse expansion can be accomplished by connection to the existing building fire system. Task C — Site Plan Approval & Permitting Applications: Prepare an application for Major Site Plan Modification Approval to allow for construction of the proposed improvements. The application will be submitted to Indian River County supported by the Site Construction Plans,as well as Phasing Plans. As the project does not propose any additional residential units and impervious surface additions will be(much)less than 150,000 square feet,this application may be approved by the County Planning Department staff. Following submittal of the Major Site Plan application,the Engineer shall attend the County Technical Review Committee(TRC)meeting to obtain any comments and concerns regarding the application. In addition to the Major Site Plan application, the Engineer shall make applications to obtain approvals / permits from the following regulatory agencies to support this project: Indian River County Land Clearing Permit Indian River County Tree Removal Permit(if required) Indian River County Type A Stormwater Permit Modification St.Johns River WMD ERP Modification Application fees associated with application submittals will be provided by the Client, and have not been included in this proposal. Task D—Permitting: It is anticipated that following the review of applications,permitting agencies will issue Requests for Additional Information(RAI's)to support issuance of construction permits. Under this task the Engineer shall prepare the responses to RAI's to address the agencies concerns in order that a Site Plan Release may be issued by the Indian River County Community Development Department. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: Task E-Shop Drawing Review/Pre-Construction Meeting: Review all shop drawings and submittals for site work construction pertaining to stormwater and paving systems. Coordinate with the Contractor and his sub-contractors and Indian River County Personnel to set up the required pre-construction meeting. The"pre-con"provides an opportunity for the County to offer instructions regarding areas of special concern and to describe the construction inspection and project completion procedures. Task F - On-Site Construction Observation: During construction of the site improvements by the Contractor, the Engineer will perform sufficient construction observation at our discretion on an as-needed basis such that we can certify the construction of the phased improvements. Formal inspections require forty- eight(48)hours notice prior to procedure. D 0 N A D 1 0 & Associates, Architects, P.A. 63 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER 7721569-67M x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 (W PURCHASE ORDER: 53995 Page: 1 of 1 �� tiri;'rr•; r, -«• ` .. t, •,, h .., � r•- ,��, ��.��Y�y _.y,,, �; r � �,tr�•t'C�$".: my� - rrf' i f+ ?fry Y'%~' � •_'^ � J.'� f?. .:; p .. ' /�N'\ht'r'/�.f _ h ti Cs �;��. ',:f r• ,<. r 3 t>:3 J Y h f'�ra: r,. Cr+.i 4 t Ry.J t�. xr rY�i �,�%� •Y fit:�` % it• : � a'�;tr t:h•). •� '� .. �J�.. � _ - 1. .. .h .�Y d�' 06/04/13: 07%03113. BEST DIST Dui l�Tel6?86 MX$,R 7M1-1L 80018474715 2X2 6 _:s` :.. 3'cd"" .ter J .... ... J ._ _.. .. rh S r. �^^ .:.. .!....:.. r-'•t,`•:. 't. t..:..-.•7 r,sc�..,'..: Aa.!.GoC?''�'4tpr�...xr,e !,....r,e;n:��'cfi .-;. x...,., '�A��`.�'e�Y,•. ...._... :. :.:F .�... .: 1 22.00 EA INTERLAKE MECALUX PALLET, 104.9,500 2,308.40- G/L# 168,60052100A r Stock#900-350-010-0000 TEAR DROP BEAM PA-- PART APART #347109 4 4.4.00 EA WIRE MESH DECKING 29.9500 1,317.80 G/L# 1686 ,006442 Our Stock#900-350-010-0000 58"W X 48"D X 1- 2 PART #6132 714.00 EA INTERLAKE PALLET RACK 98.9500 1,385.30 G/; S0052].0006442 Our Stock#900-350-010-0000 TEAR GHT FRAME 48" Q . P 16 11 1.00 EA EST HIPPING 935.4100 935 .41 /L# 1686005210006442 Our Stock#475-080-000-0000 ER GLOBAL QUOTE #232196 TED 5/17/13 . *** ** TOTAL ** 5, 947 .41 :-r.t:•;:s;'•"•W ''r.'%•ti'�S• '::aY:'::c-••,:'i:"}:Y3. ;;;:ti ..................._ • ; g.. :.fkx:"•:fi':::%r.,!`r'?l!:'<: .i`,J.r..,,, o. r .{�t�?zv:.�y s�`lrL,.::h:;c:•:,::.r;>:r< _ VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: :;{:.yr .rr4:y,Kj 1. Mail Invoices to Indian River County Sheriff ?yryu� ?•Y -5�i' > 'r <} z` f 3 Attn-. Accounts Payable ; 4055 41st Ave nue :'• .K• J.h.. G f�:.c': Vero Beach, FL 32960 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this g order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. 4. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. 5. State Tax Exempt #: State # 85-801262203SC-0 SIN: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Knif fen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneiresheriff.org Vendor 65 Quotation Confirmation Page 1 of 2505 MILL CENTER PARKWAY SUITE 100 AFAKMALE BUFORD, GA 30518 global€adaatriall-C Cw Sales Quote Account#: 1263152 Quote M 2321962 Quote Issued:05/17/2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ccosner@iresheriff.org *Quote Expires 30 Days from Issue Attn: RICHARD LANE CHRIS COSNER Phone: (772)978-6208 4055 41 ST AVE Fax: VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 CLICK HERE TO LOGIN AND PLACE THIS ORDER ONLINE. Part# Description Shipping Quantity Price Txtended 347109 Interlake Mecalux Pallet Rack Tear Drop Beam Pair SOUTHEASTERN 22 $104.95 $2,308.90 120"L FRT-TRUCKING 613269 Wire Mesh Decking 58"W X 48"D X 1-1/2"H SOUTHEASTERN 44 $29.95 $1,317.80 FRT-TRUCKING Interlake Mecalux Pallet Rack Tear Drop Upright SOUTHEASTERN 347116 Frame 48"x 120" FRT-TRUCKING 14 $98.95 $1,385.30 Item Total: $5,012.00 Estimated Freight: $935.41 PLEASE BE SURE TO REVIEW OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS *Total: $5,947.41 Notes Thank you for the opportunity to help with your needs. To place your order or for further assistance please contact me. Name:MELINDA HARTLEY Email:MHARTLEY@GLOBALINDUSTRIAL.COM Phone: (678)969-6762 x2762 Fax: (678)969-6896 -Applicable taxes and shipping charges will be added to invoice.Globals standard terms and conditions appy.Please see our website www.olobalindustrial.com for details. F.: (MW file://C:\Documents and Settings\ccosner\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\51963561IRCSOPO1100130733... 5/17��= INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER (W 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 53974 Page; l of 1 .:i....:�. 'v. ...�:,•. :4.T ..4:i:S: _. y:sr,•.. L:•::cy?'falay. rx{s:: .•s•-a -✓' v v. .!.••L: :.,..�r.•..=..:•.-,f;:yC s •r. 51� $}�!f:Y A ik 'IF' },rte L ;.'r F f f7k ?5k v ---- . f rs � i Lfi .s ,:ry','•F:cx'x•}:6c.;;.:s}•k:.'Ff } ! ,.:SYt.i:r..:-:."• ;:x:.N.S w5,n• ,}+ w ry>{J.r;•},t,or}L:;it,^};.::�: Y c -`z" fi s `J:& ro< yt p}a& '�Lhr ;<r r.r a y o r r /q�C } ♦ ,c :t r} LJ F t p JEi} 'f} i r t >L r }i 3�.- - ��,,{ [ { _Gyc JT r }Y § L•?cE••rrF ` h✓�" 'f:d�• S ¢ fi3' r 1�Y1 `r��17 CJ }f zo r a7i '•;Lx ��<� r5 r c t• t res, s :r x'J}•f3CF•4'� v��y •:.r•�x•s�Jtfi 'rs� ..sr�Yr�.,,��+ ?�rihc'vs' :w fr'"�Ytir{,r f.5c•,..r�. 5. `�v yc �1"e1�yl' VR B { }, �� t '{rte:-�FO � n•Z r <,: �� £ f J :y }✓�y,,.f>.t•t s.3k`4.tF;>'L fYr "t<✓.�A.y`:a '2<>5'f:t r'•f,: 2i ,tJ i fA :'- # t• -r 2 9LJ !. :'Y ✓-`'' F � t`� }f5 t'�•. n � a'i ':.f v s t�''wrF$-M{Y��.c�3.•}s �' -:� f �{ < .f lf„ Fc rr k`sJ+s< 'w✓`:�� v a�•fl fBt}`+'r r std..-t ''�n ,•�,c JYJy't�.• �`a��'T�nJ` vYi J-.n.' 1 iri a � >I i <.:.. .:. ....'f..:..fY'. ... 1'' riu, }n rJr rc. I\•+� .. a Y• x"s•"SYs�f•i a•¢.o'3cr'yf �;: �} �pyv/�.YY,T, vI`-,s. ;�� a. y,•u •`.o•+� "''ci4- /J�.. ":rrr firX' y. .S� rt ?' iwL�};Yrayx�s�ys• %fi " �.1: � <f/;"':t;:>:: Tn:...M?C'C..'Y.ti%Y-[.i. �- �jj-�' ,�ff,�y.L xL� ,�j�, {,�� i.�.+fS•f�"'vM.Y tLi�ifiL`X.M4(.{.t♦�+�:�,v .. ..�a. ..:f� .`�. ,:Z:h ....:i"..:i'i_')i.'.:x: •� v'9Ff ,F:i.�i.Y.nFF.fi�v.....Xa.'�w`h'rf. Y .... 8f�...L{t�.�}%2.?.�.•".}itR:4RMf tS{SvW. .... - 05M13 I 06121A.1 I DFST SFST' Dftb'W' 30 n � .. ;�G^�yH.T- }{ } -u fA -� .. # � �.� -'/.•' ,..+•hYF�„� F.'�� .'.-f✓:i Y ?{ e Y; J.. 'a..t.�,(_,�'p_., #!aw•.� �,�f..,} .:n: ...r. :. ....... s... .. Fa a.s. J,m'2.:.�v�:-`*`�. �,fi�.zi.?',}r...�r•s,�x7 s �:iNr� }''� } J f.4}�}(•' /..Y r J �i=v+sem -1�3rt+��.:"JSJt7R J :^nc r+�'\ ha }J o }."teJ'{3 va H_ .. ✓ff� F ;� ♦ _ ..M1O ..._5.:_..��a�n� :..4�.1.., . C>1J�... 6�..�y ,.�� SO1l:•• fJ'/ }F .tJ'C;} k'-..i. Nn�.Lf-Z:v..'y':iJh .(:.�f4.'.. �� vq_.i-.:_.-f.a..:. �l ..... 1 1. 00 EA CORRECTIONS DIV. -EXTRA 5, 585.0000 5,585.00 G/L# 16:8600521Ei Our Stack#900-350-010-0000 CATHCO TO FURNISH ;. EQUIPMENT AND MAT FOR THE FOLLOWING A. INSTALL 20 DOUBLE 15" ADS CULVERT H FILL B. INSTAL 5 L OF 12 FT HIGH 9 G,A H C. INS-- 4 8 FT WIDE G, TE D. T WE 4" SCH40 GAT POST 40 LINE POST, 3' T AND 1 1 5/8" TOP JAND *** CATHCO PROPOSAL FOR FENCE DATED 5/23/13 *** ** TOTAL ** 5, 585.00 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: ** SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS }# 1. Mail Invoices to : Indian River County Sheriff Attn: Accounts Payable 4055 41st Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this 3 • (Worder without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. . Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. qff 5. State Tax Exempt #: State # 85-89126220350-0 BIN: 59-6000.677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Kniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skai£feneircaheriff.org venaor 67 CAT108 SITE WORK DIVISION INC. 5550 41ST STREET *VERO BEACH,FL 32967 *(772)562-8814 *FAX(772)562-0173 cathcoinc@bellsouth.net Date: May 23,2013 To: .Indian River County Sheriff 4055 413t Street Vero Beach,FL 32960 Proposal For: Correction,Imnrovements=Extra Fence Vero Beach,FL We hereby propose to furnish labor,equipment and materials for the following: 1. Install 20 LF of Double 15"ADS Culverts with Fill 2. Install 55 LF of 12 FT High 9 GA Fence 3. Install One 8 FT Wide Gate 4. To Include 4" SCH40 Gate Post,3"SCH40 Line Post,3"Term Post and l 15/8"Top and Mid Rail Total S 5,585.00 NOTES: 1. Price is Valid for Work to be Completed by August 2013,Cathco to be Compensated for Cost Increases Beyond that Date. EXCLUSIONS: Permits;Engineering; Bonds&Fees; Sod, Seed&Mulch,and Landscaping; Irrigation System; Repair/Relocation of Existing Utilities/Services in Conflict with this Work;Removal,Disposal and Replacement of Unsuitable Materials; Demucking,Layout;As-Built Drawings;Testing,Driveway Sidewalks;Concrete Flatwork;Erosion Control;Power Pole Removal/Relocation. This proposal subject to acceptance within 15 days and is void thereafter at the option of the undersigned. Approved Signature Wa tt .Eisert As Agent for Cathco, Inc. 68 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW OR, ER 7721569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/209-0657 PURCHASE ORDER.: 53973 Page: 1 of 1 IX X Ytl{lFnif7'.s. S<t > YSt}1c.'X{Nh1tr1waX•xktJE'.?t•i•:.£a�">E ksr hko,':rS+yt at' ,tytAFP'�j,�,.\{v.t_ y �,4�11 f � 011.1.i 6w rKME— TZ UZ X-9 olt i }> } Y i : S /'.. 4 { phi.!Y. �:3} f {"'•T{}FJ F t .�..`. Y.{;YY{:1-.:€:=-�•'��i'c�mfr... sW ABY F�r:Cs,.:v,'A� t fi ! '�Y,VL Y.�Y', X 3}f'n"w�MI' 'Tni.Y r' f'd4r..E\.]u'•,v.:i'•.f i':Si.\%Y}F � € vF < .s. r h.. a'�s��'".#.,�rr's�,{ s} �'<'��u�.+t�YCu�rs'>t :,•.y:;�:::•.- � sikr. �• ,�i':s•3.F �:,�,:;<. {Y•r •e;::�::4�r:<;o: � m a E> Y'�.,..:.;x.s,?.'� v ^,'rr._..af.<C:.w #fi .r�?5"".'3>r..?.. y{...,.:.{... {s.:.lj•.. ¢kYYy -,_ r. .Y `�Yi..:.::� Yi ...,....... IM 4 at'.-y W �sv. '`•r '`?.1 .'t 'fiw.i'31�4".:tt3o,.ct.�2 Y �'` •.... .. 1 r .�l ..,y;":a r..., x.:. 05/28113, 0612 3 � T D r ; �. _ ::: � dr,-Y�:t3 •,troay, � .:. v} --• r •x S 4 _- 3y;-o-t,-.�. f-- �Y . .`y 3.a�. ... _ '`r�?r,...,k <�.-:`'tr•^+, ,� -'.. -:'. Ze::}@.•�:�Yt. . .. ._a� "ai{2"t t#s :o F�-„a�. �i?:.r.�+.F�r .3�....:r-�” { s :r 3• : �r . . xiW>a��G >t w• i 3 .. 1 1 .00 EA CORRECTIONS DIV.-I1eIPEfl m. 14,116.0000' 14, 176.00 G/L# 1.6&6W 217 0= Stock#900-350-6-10-0000 AS FOLLOWS A.. ISUM EXTW$ B. TELEPHONE I T. M SYSTEM (INCLUDES BOL: C. ALUM3NU1! 1E . - TO KEE GATE OPERA= R 11 I. ,TIDE OF F' TD D`. 20 EA TTON RECEIVERS E. 10 iITTON ' C8IVE RS F. 2 14" SQUARE STEEL POWD<. - D DARK BRONZE LI S, EACH WITH (2) 1 Q PULSE-START METAL SHOEB;OX-TYPE FIXTURE EACH ELECTRIC DISCO CT S (PER PLAN CHANGES) LABOR. & MATERIALS TO FI BROKEN WIRES (FOOTER EXC. ) I. PERMITS AS PER CATHCO, INC. REVISED CHANGE ORDER #2 DATED 5/23/ 3 . ..}.h.... .......:.. .. .... VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: :::a�;r{;i�'�':'#p$�Fi4-LE=?I[t$.• OlAS3 ��r•. „r:k?':u<-:i;•:::::.YY::{{::;z:;:;:::,;•, j:i;Y'::.{ti•'��-�YY:':{`::-:i:t:v'-7:,2�£.. :^{':'•tiQ::i:{tC....i.}::..3i.:i•:..v::. ry •; g:.:T'::::•::4�.:,-:Y:Y.v,.4.::::i.•.{.:.::::+:::.: .i.::.y-Y:}•iY:-Y::`i.'-:i::':�. 1. Mail Imoiees to Indian River- County Sheriff Attn: Accounts Payable 4055 41st Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. 9 . Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. 5. State Tax Exempt #: State # 85-8012622035C-0 EIN: 59-6000677 Buya 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Kniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneircaheriff.org Vendor 69 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF NEW ORDER (AW 772/569-6700 x6206 Fax 772/299-0657 PURCHASE ORDER: 53973 Page:2 of 1 { ti r :It of ',�' r��t*a:. n �+ado r•,. s r •,$ '' _!c Jrr a ♦NOW S�' � y,, t ,ryr n � s}•- �,fief<t rc r �� 7 Lt r .?WI' i,-v �.h 'OYG.e�s• •f' 'C. fi•.�.: x�.>< i,-.may s > ti:�v�J.(t'+�xj�'}K.''ttrr+ x`''`>,�'?f� � '� Ki�.•�S yi'}�s�� - "+..Y' �qk��"�k��a f - Fa ,f yy�, :- R. s,�y u d .�•,`• y6. vG &. t{}`�Vit, $ `�sq �y,M � t •�r r: k' � z.t 01 -'<t•`"°w9+2f J d'� aS '•St `,v G""`�' ,St. l r f )t;'E �t�� ,��.rr '' �. :•�}`'f'a r•..�a• u9.: :it��. Y:-�` •".�' '>'"`�•vsj �t'y'�' Yd"4 s �f�`',4.K Rs� r t - yt�• my 1/,e$ y yY s'�,: ��r r � � r . ry�•{�e t~" �'f��yx'k��i � ,,�{. i'' �. e' } h',�+,td-£ � +Cr } Gx`i3-.J�� r � r'e. �s r k�.++�' a ' 4 b�ham` ��u'�`•4�c �1"rh a�t• � u r.Y ....... est"' ys.f ¢� � ��y�p F�,r .f ,y f. `r. •� r -'fit..G...-:•+ .....'.`. 1+,. , ,d`..ir✓'.-r r...n,-.,f�.a..: d! :;iia}! r rt^w 4•t i�:i>.✓} E'�''r�..'t4`�, '�.N Y• p,�':-�k• < , .;n.,.,.-d.r.....: .:'£`_y .y+'.i�!c?:'.... .�,L...�,.-,35R.' isn'.:,. �A"e•;.. ,:...,y '�..... ,�;''�<...3.f...: � .�. �rU ...... 5�..��ri��o �iry4.A,,• ,x. �R?'.�� st�o2t�s�'`o- T .. 'eyy, RGl - t :' y •`f' e :.... a -� ..re.4. 4�'Y ke v.: S1.�5. �r°:yr}'tw< 1''3.t •#-!- 05124/13 0.6/27113_ 1F�' MI ' Du1+T3, _. ,,.yyam� 1��7T.. y�-f :�,�x z - eb'�,..•.�a�.� •, '- �� y ".. •:. :x"' fir• s . - rpt 3i�r tr s",x�- tot •' y xf i - :.. - a r._1:., •S t1'atl� x>s 2;3.:•.+,.?+.4?� .:.5;' `� v�i,�'�1�{ji hs�ra�x � 4�'��:G, dx..3x.. c- rr ��, �y.�' FY��- Y.�,;�•_y � *: TUTArL * 14,176.00 VENDOR INSTRUCTIONS: +* SPE£2AL INSTRi3CTIOP§s +b 1. Mail Invoices to Indian River County Sheriff Attn: Accounts Payable 4055 41st Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 2. Invoices and Packages must bear the P.O. No. above. 3. Purchases may not exceed the total amount of this 0 order without prior approval by the Purchasing Dept. (W 1. Acceptance of this order includes acceptance of all terms, prices, delivery instructions, specifications and conditions. 5. State Tax Exempt #: State # 85-501262203SC-0 EIN: 59-6000677 Buyer 6. For order questions, please call Sophie Kniffen at (772) 978-6203 or e-mail skniffeneiresheriff.org Vendor 70 CATNCOr INON (W 5550 41s`STREET*VERO BEACH,FL 32967*(772)562-8814*FAX(772)562-0173 CHANGE ORDER# 2 Date: May 23, 2013 REVISED To: Indian River County Sheriff 4055 41s'Street Vero Beach,FL 32960 Re: Purchase Order: 53265—Corrections Improvements We hereby agree to make the following changes to the above referenced project.- Revisions roject.Revisions and Modifications 1. Island Extension ADD $2,200.00 2. Telephone Intercom System(Includes Bollards South Ent.) ADD $ 3,029.00 3. Aluminum Returns To keep Gate Operators inside of Yard ADD $ 770.00 4. 20 Each 2 Button Receivers ADD $ 617.00 5. 10 Each 1 Button Receivers ADD $ 257.00 (W 6. 2 Each 15' 4"Square Steel Powder-Coated Dark Bronze ADD $ 5,607.00 Light Poles,Each with(2) 150 Watt Pulse-Start Metal Halide Shoebox-Type Fixtures 7. 3 Each Electric Disconnect Boxes(Per Plan Changes) ADD $ 1,086.00 8. Labor&Materials to-Fix Broken Wires(Footer Exc.) ADD $ 811.00 9. Credit for Labors(Ditch Excavation) DEDUCT($ 900.00) 10. Permits ADD $ 699.00 TOTAL CHANGE $14,176.00 Subject to Existing Contract Conditions and Exclusions Indian River Cou eriff By Printed Name: iA Date Cathco Inc. By Matthew S.Eisert, as agent for Cathco,Inc. Date 71 Page 1 of 1 Martha Asher - Check requests From: Martha Asher To: Vera Morris Date: 4/9/2013 11:19 AM Subject: Check requests $650 to IRC(application for Phase II- Corrections Impact Fee Project/Site Plan). $120 to IRC(application for Phase II-Corrections Impact Fee Project/Land Clearing) Both from 300/3143. Send checks to me for delivery. Thanks. �7,..///!v./fT�o,•./..,+ool+o+/A�.►Tl.�+o/T .,.•�1/TA,,,,,IXPrn�,.:rice/S1�ZFQSSTR('C(lP(111M1f5F5(, aizni�niz 72 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA(W MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Dire4MnagerW AND Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engine Michael D. Nixon, P.E., Roadway Production1V FROM: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Project Engineer Aw SUBJECT: Work Order No. 3 with Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc. 12th Street and 27th Avenue Intersection Improvements IRC Project No. 9334 DATE: May 22, 2013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On March 3, 2013 the Board of County Commissioners approved the renewal of an annual agreement for Professional Geotechnical Services, with Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc for various services including, but not limited to,field and laboratory construction materials testing in Indian River County. The purpose of Work Order No. 3 is to provide construction materials testing services for the construction of 12th Street and 27th Avenue Intersection Improvements. Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc. has submitted a proposal outlined in the attached Work Order No. 3 and Engineering Testing Services (Exhibit A)for a not-to-exceed amount of$ 21,470.00. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available from Traffic Impact Fees, District 2,Account No. 10215241- 066510-02033, 12th Street and 27th Avenue Intersection. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Work Order No. 3 to Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc. authorizing the above-mentioned professional services as outlined in the attached Engineering Testing Services (Exhibit A) and requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to (W execute the attached Work Order No. 3 on their behalf for a not-to-exceed amount of $21,470.00. 73 F•\a.�.r U/n.Le\FAIl:iAIPFRTN/:TlT{l7CfllAi PDl1TC!`TC\OI1A_I .h C..ew P.1'f.l. .,.,...�i...........:....1..................♦.i.:.-1....e..i..:..__n�n.,.....a_.,.-.,.,__ Page 2 12th Street and 27th Avenue Intersection Improvements Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Project Engineer (W For June 18, 2013 BCC Meeting ATTACHMENTS 1. Work Order No. 1 with Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc. 2. Exhibit A—Engineering Testing Services DISTRIBUTION 1. Craig E. Dunkelberger, Dunkelberger Engineering and Testing, Inc. 2. Deward Howard,Jr., Construction Coordination Manager APPROVED AGENDA ITEM (W FOR June 18, 2013 BY Indian River County ApppyvXd `Date Administration ct�//--(j)n Budget Legal Public Works G, Z.4 Engineering , - 5-13 (awl 74 VAMA R.. nTVTCTOW PRnTF(-rZgiid_I7th'Zf rr R.77th A--.Tntncrrtinn it—.NRrr A.—A.nPT Anr Board of County Commissioners 180127th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Telephone: (772) 567-8000 FAX: (772)-778-9391 Field and Laboratory Quality Control (QC) for 12th Street and 27th Avenue Intersection Improvements IRC Project No. 9334 WORK ORDER NO. 3(Engineering Division) FOR FOR PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT RFQ No. 2010021 WITH DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. All services performed under this contract shall be supervised and certified by a licensed Professional Engineer(PE) registered with the State of Florida and staff employed directly with your firm. Scope of Services All work shall be performed on a unit price basis in accordance with the attached Engineering Testing Services (Exhibit A) dated April 12, 2013 and shall comply with Standards enumerated in the ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT, RFQ 2010021 WITH DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING AND TESTING INC. Effective Renewal Date: March 3, 2013. Minimum Specification Requirements as follows: Soil Compaction Concrete Compressive Strength Testing Laboratory testing Engineering reporting All work shall also comply with the current Florida Minimum Technical Standards. (W C:\Documents and Se1tings\tiffanygV,=1 Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.0ut1ook\5V2Y0WRIMON 3 DUNKELBERGER 05-22- 2013.doc 75 WO#3 12th Street and 27th Avenue Intersection Improvements IRC Project No. 9334 COMPENSATION. The COUNTY agrees to pay, and the Geotechnical Professional agrees to accept, a fee for services rendered according to the "Engineering Testing Services" identified in the attached EXHIBIT"A" Fee Schedule and Man Hours. A Not-to-Exceed Amount of: $21,470.00 to be paid on a unit price basis for actual work performed in accordance with the schedule of services and fees set forth in Exhibit A of RENEWAL OF THE ANNUAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRACT, RFQ 2010021 WITH DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. Effective Date: March 3, 2013 TIME FOR COMPLETION This Work Order No.3 shall run concurrently with the construction work for the 12th Street and 27th Avenue Intersection Improvements. IN WITNESS HEREOF the parties hereto have executed these presents This day of , 2013. OWNER DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING&TESTING, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INC. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA Joseph E.Flescher,Chairman Crai E.Dunkelberger,P.E.,Pr in p Engineer Approved by BCC Witnessed by: ATTEST: Jeffrey R.Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk Tiffany G d a Approved as to Form and Lega i ien : Alan S.Poladkwich,Sr.,County Attorney Joseph .Baird,County Admi istrator C:\Documents and Setrings\tiffanyg\I oW Settings;'femporary Internet Files\Content.Outlookl5V2YO�N'Rl\WO#3 DUNKELBERGER 05-22- 2013.doc 76 DUNKELBERGER - Fort Lauderdale engineering & testing, inc. • Port Saint Lucie www.dunkelberger-engineering.com • Sarasota. West Palm Beach Indian River County :._ . _. ..:.. ._._._ . _---_----____ April 12, 2013 180127`Street " + >f =�"' 11 ?t 11 i Project No. PSL-09-3054(10.7) ' 1.4 Vero Beach, Florida 3?96& " v �. � 1 �. 1 Attention: Mr. Arjuna Weragoda, RE....via e-mail(aweagoda@ircgov.com) Project Engineer Subject: Engineering Testing Services 12th Street and 27th Avenue Improvements—IRC Project#9334 Indian River County,Florida Dear Mr. Weragoda: INTRODUCTION As requested, Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc. (Dunkelberger) is pleased to submit this proposal for Engineering Testing Services during construction activities at the subject project in Vero Beach(Indian River County),Florida. PROJECT INFORMATION The project involves drainage and roadway improvements to approximately %2 mile of'121h Street starting about 250 feet east of 32nd Avenue through the intersection at 27th Avenue to about 400 feet east of 25th Avenue. The proposed drainage improvements primarily involve the installation of about 2,400 lineal feet (lf) of 60-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and 1,781 if of 8-inch diameter Type H underdrain. Associated with the primary drainage trunk line will be secondary drainage consisting of 12-inch, 15-inch and 18-inch diameter RCP. The roadway improvements will include new construction (road widening) and asphalt milling. In addition, there will be concrete headwalls, sidewalks and driveway construction. Also, a traffic signal mast arm will be installed at the intersection of 12th Street and 27th Avenue. The scope of work described in this proposal is based on our review of the construction drawings prepared by Indian River County — Engineering Division, dated May 25, 2012, and our experience with similar projects for you in the past. SCOPE OF SERVICES We will provide the required construction materials testing services for the project. The specific scope of our services will include the following: State of Florida Board of Professional Engineers Authorization No. 6870 Toll Free(877) 643.6832 77 12th Street and 27th Avenue Improvements Page 2 Project No. PSL-09-3054 (10.7) April 12,2013 (W Field Observation & Testing • Earthwork observations by an engineering technician during the site grading operation including the proof-rolling of "strip grade" for the roadway widening alignment and embankment Construction as requested by Indian River County. • In-place density testing will be performed during placement of the embankment fill for roadway widening. The density tests will be performed at a frequency of approximately one (1) test for every 200 lineal feet of roadway/embankment within the proposed alignment, for each 1-foot thickness of backfill placed. • In-place density testing during backfilling of storm drains and catch basins for each 1-foot lift of backfill placed from the bottom of the structure up to an elevation corresponding to final grade. • In-place density testing during backfilling of the rigid and flexible pipelines. Below pavement areas, density tests will.be performed at a frequency of approximately one test location for each 2001f(or fraction thereof) of pipe. At each roadway or driveway crossing, density tests will be performed for each 6-inch lift of backfill placed starting at an elevation corresponding to the invert of the pipe and extending up to the final grade. • In-place density tests within the stabilized subgrade and base course layers at a frequency of approximately one (1) test for each 200 if of roadway. At roadway crossings for the pavement restoration, 24-inches of base rock will be placed and tested in four(4)6-inch lifts. • In-place density tests for the sidewalk and driveway subgrade prior to concrete placement. • Sampling, slump testing, molding, transporting, curing, and laboratory testing to determine the compressive strength of concrete used for the sidewalk, driveways and curbing. Laboratory Testing • Perform laboratory moisture-density relationship (Proctor) tests (AASHTO T-180 and AASHTO T-99) and sieve analysis (percent fines for soil classification purposes) tests on the embankment fill and/or pipe backfill soils. • Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) tests for stabilized subgrade and base course within the roadways. • Concrete cylinder test specimens will be tested following ASTM C39 for their compressive strength at 7 days and 28 days after placement. Eg ineerinz&Reporting • Engineering oversight during the construction to coordinate the aforementioned test program, make site visits, attend progress meetings, and provide professional engineering consultation, as needed. • Submittal of brief engineering reports documenting our findings and test results. (W DUNKMERGER 78 12th Street and 27`"Avenue Improvements Page 3 Project No.PSL-09-3054 (10.7) April 12, 2013 r+ Our construction materials testing services will be provided on an as-needed basis as dictated by the .pace and methods of construction. For scheduling purposes, we normally request at least 24 hours notice prior to the time the field services are needed. TERMS AND PAYMENT We propose to bill this work on a unit rate basis in accordance with our current 2013-2014 Continuing Geotechnical Services Agreement. Based on the described scope of work and testing frequencies, we have provided an Estimated Scope and .Budget (Attachment A) for the required services and established a budget of$21,470.00. Attachment B is our Project Data Sheet. 000 Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal and looks forward to rendering the services described herein. Should you accept this proposal, we understand this work will be performed under a purchase order issued by Indian River County. To ensure proper distribution of our test reports, please complete the attached Project .Data Sheet and return it to our Port St. Lucie office. Should you have any questions concerning the contents, please (W feel free to call either of the undersigned. Very truly yours, DUNKELBERGER ENGMERING & TESTING,INC. t David T. Youngstr0 rai Dunkelberge , E. Senior Project M r P ' cipal Engineer 3054(10.7).phr.4-12-13 Attachments: A—Estimated Scope and Budget B—Project Data Sheet DUNKELDRRGRR 79 Estimatede and Budget ment A Engineers asting Services Project Name: 12th Street and 27th Avenue Improvements Dunkelberger Engineering&Testing,Inc. Vero Beach(Indian River County),Florida 607 NW Commodity Cove Client: Indian River County Attn: Arjuna Weragoda,PE Port St.Lucie,Florida 34986 Dunkelberger Project No.: PSL-09-3054(BG 10.7) (772)344-9787 FAX(772)343-9404 Date: April 12,2013 Contact: David T.Youngstrom Construction Testing Services ContractAmount Itemized Services Qty Unit Price Amount �y A,GU .9, ARt � 8 Remaining on Contract L Field Observation&Testing Q1Y 'mom QtY Amount A.Senior Engineering Technician -Earthwork,Sampling,Cyl Pickup and Standt 22 hour $55.00 $1,210.00 0 $A 09 0 $A A0 8 $A$A 22 $1,210.00 B.Density Tests -Embankment 40 test $23.00 $920.00 8 $0:00 A $0.-W 09 0.00 8 $A AA 40 $92 -Storm Drainage 400 test $23.00 $9,200.00 0 $0 0A 0 $0 0 $0 AA 400 $9,200.00 -Stabilized Subgrade 50 test $23.00 $1,150.00 GI 0 $0:00 0 $A,OA 50 $1,150.00 -Base Course 50 test $23.00 $1,150.00 0 $0.99 0 $A:AA 0 $A AA 50 -SidewalWDrlveway Compacted Subgrade 30 test $1,150.00 $23.00 $690.00 0 $0 AA A $A 9A A $A 0A 30 $690.00 C.Concrete Testing -Headwalls,Sidewalks&Slabs 14 set $85.00 $1,190.00 0 $04)9 A $A 0A 8 $A 00 14 $1,190.00 Subtotal $15,510.00 $0:00 $0 09 $O.AA $15,510.00 ll. Laboratory Testing Proctors(T-99 and T-180) 10 test $86.00 $860.00 0 $A:OA 0 $0 0A 0 $4$A 10 Sieve Analysis(Percent Fines) 10 test $30.00 $300.00 0 $A OA 0 $049 0 $860,00 Limerock Bearing Ratio(LBR) 8 test $300.00 10 $300.00 $2,400.00 0 $O:AA A $A AA 8 $2,400.00 ill. Engineering&Consultation Subtotal $3,560.00 $0=80 $"o $GM $3,560.00 Registered Professional Engineer* 20 hour $120.00 $2,400.00 0 *Allowance for site meetings,trouble-shooting, �`� 0 $ 0 $A 88 20 $2,400.00 and consultation. Test costs include engineering and reporting Subtotal $2,400.00 $0 0B $8 98 $2,400.00 TOTAL $21,470.00 $A;Og �g;gg $� $21,470.00 00 0 3054(10.7).cmt est '1 f f l INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM (W-TO: Jose h A. Baird p , County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P.E Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray,Jr. Coastal Engineer 9 SUBJECT: Work Order No.2 Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Repair—Post Hurricane Sandy Design and Permitting Services DATE: June 5, 2013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On March 19, 2013 the Board approved a contract with Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. (CPE) for professional coastal engineering services in Indian River County for a two-year term, 2013-2015. CPE is the selected County consultant for professional engineering services related to the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Repair. (W The Sector 3 Project area sustained damage from Hurricane Sandy (October 2012) and is in need of repair to maintain protection to upland properties and infrastructure from future storm events. The proposed Work Order No. 2 provides professional engineering services for the design and permitting of the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Repair Project. The cost for Work Order No. 2 is a lump sum amount of$68,392. Please note: Task 7 of Work Order No. 2 provides a not-to-exceed amount of $5,618 for an optional permitting meeting with FDEP in Tallahassee or with USACE in Jacksonville in the event that issues arise that cannot be resolved via regular correspondence and/or conference calls. If a meeting is required,Task 7 of Work Order No. 2 will be authorized making the total maximum cost of Work Order No. 2 $74,010. FUNDING Local funding of Beach Restoration includes a portion of Local Option Tourist Tax Revenue as well as allocation of the One Cent Sales Tax. For FY 12/13, funding in the amount of$192,625 is budgeted and available for design and permitting of the Sector 3 Beach Restoration repair project in the Beach Restoration Fund, Sector 3 Renourishment—Post Hurricane Sandy Account No.12814472-066510-13014. The proposed Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Repair Project is eligible for 501yo State cost share and has been included in the State approved budget for FY 2013/14. Over the next few (W months, staff will develop a cost sharing agreement with FDEP; which will be presented to the Board for approval once completed. FAPublic Works\JamesG\Sector 3\CPE Work Orders\Work Order No.2--Sector 3 Post Sandy Repair\agenda item Coastal Planning and Engineering Work Order#2.docx 81 Page 2 BCC Agenda Item Sector 3 Beach Restoration Repair (W June 18, 2013 RECOMMENDATION The recommendation of staff is for the Board to approve Work Order No. 2 to the contract with Coastal Planning and Engineering Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENT Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. Work Order No. 2 (2 original copies) APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: June 18,201n3 Indian River County Apjuqved Date Administration Budget Legal - ?j Public Works -/3 Coastal Eng.Division (W F:\Public Works\JamesG\Sector 3\CPE Work Orders\Work Order No.2--Sector 3 Post Sandy Repair\agenda item Coastal Planning and Engineering Work Order#2.docx 82 WORK ORDER NUMBER 2 AGENDA COPY (W SECTOR 3 BEACH AND DUNE RESTORATION REPAIR PROJECT DESIGN AND PERMITTING SERVICES This Work Order Number 2 is entered into as of this_ _day of 2013 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of March 19, 2013 ("Agreement"), by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. ("CONSULTANT"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1, attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 2, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 2, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as (W of the date first written above. CONSULTANT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Coastal Plannin 8 En ineerin Inc. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: By: Gord 6. Thomson, P.E., D.CE Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Title: Vice-President Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Date: May 31, 2013 Comptroller By: (Seal) Deputy Clerk Approved: By: seph A. Baird, County Administrator Ap Wafoand i iency: By: (W raa1, Deputy County Attorney 83 t (W May 24,2013 Rev May 30, 2013 James Gray Indian River County Public Works - Coastal Engineering Division 1801 27th St,Building A Vero Beach,FL 32960 Subject: Indian River County Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Repair—Post Hurricane Sandy 2012 Joint Coastal Permit Application Dear James: Indian River County constructed the Sector 3 Beach Restoration Project between February 2010 and March 2012, which 3 construction phases. Fill was placed between Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) (W Monuments R-55 and R-20. Following construction of Sector 3, the region was impacted by Hurricane Sandy in October 2012. The Sector 3 project area sustained damaged and is in need of repair to maintain protection to upland properties and infrastructure during future storm events. The proposed Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Repair Project is eligible for 50% State cost share and is included in the State approved budget for FY 2013/14. This proposal outlines the scope of work to design and permit the repair of the Sector 3 project area damaged as a result of Hurricane Sandy. Preliminary Project Design and Feasibility Report In the initial phase of the design, available information will be evaluated in the development of the project size. The intent is to utilize.available beach survey data from the County's most recent monitoring event (scheduled for July 2013) as the preliminary design survey to aid in the initial design and permitting effort. The design template constructed in 2010-2012 will be used as the basis of the design. The July 2013 surveys will be analyzed to estimate the volume of material required to reconstruct the dune and berm lost to Hurricane Sandy. In particular, the placement of fill landward of the mean high water line (MHW) will be considered to limit potential impacts to hardbottom resources and expedite the permitting process. A feasibility analysis will be performed to evaluate potential sand borrow sources to be utilized for fill material. The analysis will evaluate various upland sand sources and offshore borrow areas to identify the most economical and cost effective option. The upland sand sources,including Ranch Road Lake and Fischer 86th mines,will be considered as they have been previously approved by the FDEP under the County's sea turtle test plan for grain size, color, and density. (W 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 84 (W Offshore borrow areas previously identified and permitted by the County will be reviewed to determine the volume of beach compatible sand and determine their cost effectiveness. The data used to develop the borrow area will be reviewed,including the bathymetric, seismic, side scan sonar, and magnetometer survey data, vibracore logs, cultural resource report and any environmental resource surveys conducted in the vicinity of the borrow area. We intend to use the same outline and depths as previously developed unless there is a specific permitting or construction reason that the borrow area must be revised. We will inform the County prior to making any changes. It is assumed that since there will be no changes from the previous permitted borrow area and that the permit has not expired as yet (with respect to the borrow area) that the previous survey information is sufficient and no additional field work is required. We will develop borrow area permit sketches based on this review. If additional field investigations are required in order to permit the borrow area,a separate work order will be proposed to the County. It is advised that an updated bathymetric survey be conducted prior to construction but this is not included in this scope of work. The fill volumes and sand borrow sources will be used to estimate construction costs and durations. The construction timeline will consider sea turtle nesting season and expected permit conditions. Deliverables CPE will provide the following deliverables: 1. An electronic copy (MS Word and PDF formats) of the draft feasibility report for the County's review and comments. 2. Two(2)hard copies an electronic copy of the final feasibility report. Required Data CPE requests that the following information be provided by the County to be used in the design of the Sector 3 berm and dune repair project. 1. Beach Profile Monitoring Surveys — The County has scheduled beach profile monitoring surveys to be completed in July 2013. The intent is to use the survey as the basis of the design for the dune repair. 2. Dune and Berm Template —The dune and berm template constructed 2010-2012 will used to estimate the volume of material required to repair the project area to the pre-Hurricane Sandy condition. 3. Upland Sand Source Information—Information regarding the sediment characteristics and mine production rates will be used to evaluate the equilibrium beach profile and the anticipated construction durations. 4. Offshore Borrow Area Data—The following data will be required to verify and resubmit the offshore borrow area: bathymetric, seismic, side scan sonar, and magnetometer survey data;vibracore logs;cultural resources report; CAD files associated with the borrow area outline; offshore resource surveys in the vicinity of the borrow area. Schedule Upon receipt of the requested information we will begin the design and evaluation of the potential options for repairing the Sector 3 project area. It is anticipated that 60 days will be required to complete the analysis and compose a feasibility report documenting the findings. At such time, a draft report will be provided to the County for its review and comments. Once the comments are returned to CPE, the final report addressing the comments will be (W submitted to the County within in 15 days. 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 85 (W Cost The cost to analyze the project area and compose a feasibility report is $11,747. A breakdown of the hours and expenses to develop these costs is attached and follow the terns of CPE's agreement with Indian River County. Joint Coastal Permit Pre-Application Meetings It is anticipated that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems (BBCS) will require that a Joint Coastal Permit QCP) application be submitted for this project given the volume of sand required and the nearshore hardbottom resources. We will request, prepare for, and lead a pre- application meeting with the FDEP. This meeting will be conducted via teleconference. We will provide information required by 6213-49.004,much of which will be included in the Preliminary Project Design and Feasibility Report. We will request that the FDEP expedite the permitting process and will explore the project through the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) permit process but expect that they will require that the Joint Coastal Permit process be followed. The purpose of the meeting will be to describe the proposed project and determine the agencies'requirements for the pending permit application. Available information will be presented to the agencies to determine the sufficiency of the information for permit file development. A separate pre-application meeting will be held with the Federal permitting agency (USACE)and Federal commenting agencies (USFWS, NOAA-NMFS). Again, we will request, prepare for, and lead the meeting. Meetings with the Federal agencies are generally conducted via conference call. Based on the results of the meetings, the extent of the permit application requirements will be determined. (W Deliverables CPE will request, prepare for, and lead two separate pre-application meetings. Following the meeting, CPE will compose minutes documenting the discussions that were had and distribute the minutes to the County and the permitting agencies. Schedule The pre-application meeting will be held upon completion of the draft feasibility report. The intent is to conduct the meeting concurrently with the County's review of the report and document so the comments from the permitting agencies can be included in the final deliverables. Cost The cost to conduct and compose minutes for the pre-application meeting is $5,991. A breakdown of the hours and expenses to develop these costs is attached and follow the terms of CPE's agreement with Indian River County. Update the Environmental Assessment The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to consider environmental impacts during their decision-making process for major federal actions. An Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared for the initial Sector 3 project. This will be updated to include data collected following submittal of the initial EA. The previous project did not require an Environmental Impact Statement and the EA will be revised to highlight that, to date, there have been no impacts above those originally estimated within the original EA. Therefore,we will suggest (W that a Finding of No Significant Impacts (FONSI) can be issued. If necessary,it also considers and selects measures 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 - FAX 561.391.9116 - COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 86 for mitigating identified adverse environmental impacts. According to the CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1508.9) the required general content of an EA includes: • Purpose and need for proposed action • Description of proposed action and alternatives • Environmental consequences associated with the proposed action and alternatives • Listing of agencies and persons consulted The organization of the EA plays a significant role in the overall quality of the document and its effectiveness in assessing environmental impacts. The following identifies the format of the EA and main sections: • Introduction—The introduction will identify the project need and provide a history of related actions. • Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives — The EA will contain a detailed.description of the proposed action and alternatives to fulfill the requirements of the purpose and need statement. There may be several alternatives considered,including the"No Action"alternative,as well as action alternatives. • Affected Environment—A description of the environment in which the proposed action and alternatives are to take place will be included in the EA. This section will describe current conditions and serve as a baseline against which to compare potential impacts of the alternatives. The latest biological monitoring report will be used as a basis for updating the EA. • Environmental Consequences —The EA will describe and analyze the anticipated environmental effects, if (W any,of the proposed action and alternatives on the resources described under Affected Environment. Deliverables CPE will provide the County an electronic copy of the document for the EA as outlined above. The EA will be included in the FDEP Joint Coastal Permit application to support construction of the project. Schedule The EA will be completed within 60 days of CPE receiving the draft biological monitoring report for the Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Project or the Work Order NTP, whichever is latest. As with the feasibility report, a draft EA document will be provided to the County for its review and comments. Once the comments are returned to CPE,the final EA document addressing the comments will be submitted to the County within in 15 days. Cost The cost to develop an EA document is $7,594. A breakdown of the hours and expenses to develop these costs is attached and follow the terms of CPE's agreement with Indian River County. Joint Coastal Permit Application It is assumed for the purposes of developing this scope of work that a Joint Coastal Permit application will be required. If the FDEP concedes to allowing a CCCL permit,then this item will need to be rescoped. A JCP application for a Federal Dredge and Fill Permit will be prepared and submitted to the FDEP for the dune and berm repair project. CPE will act as the agent for the County throughout the JCP application process. We will fill out (W the application from and submit it to the County for original signature. We will provide responses to all of the 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 87 (W questions included in the permit application, except as noted below, where we will coordinate the response with the County. We will coordinate with the County regarding the sovereign submerged lands application portion (questions 9, and 13 through 17) of the application. However, the County will be responsible for responding to this section including providing. documentation of upland interest, documenting user fees, and developing a list of names of upland property owners within 500 feet. Item 17 deals with the sovereign submerged land lease, which should not be applicable if the project is constructed above mean high water. We will coordinate with the County to provide written evidence that the project is consistent with the State-approved Local Comprehensive Plan. We request that the County provide an electronic copy of the Erosion Control Line for inclusion in the application. This will be included and referenced appropriately in all drawings. We will incorporate topographic and bathymetric survey based on the physical monitoring being performed independently by the County (Morgan & Eklund). We will coordinate with the County's surveyor to fulfill the requirements for topographic and bathymetric surveys. The surveys will be sufficiently recent to fulfill application requirements. We will develop signed and sealed permit sketches based on the 2013 survey and previously permitted template (which we should already have available through WO#1). The sketches will be comprised on both the beach fill area as well as the offshore borrow area. While construction plans are considered part of the JCP application,we will request that the FDEP require these as (W part of their Notice to Proceed item list. Development of final plans and specifications is included in a different portion of this scope of work and will require separate authorization. Aerials collected under WO#1 will be used to support the permit application. Collection and rectification of aerials is not included in this scope. We will develop a draft construction schedule for the County's review for inclusion in the permit application. We will coordinate with local mines to obtain sufficient geotechnical information to support the JCP application. We will review and revise the Sediment QA/QC plan developed for the initial project as necessary. Permit skectehs of the borrow area will be developed and submitted. We will describe the natural community within the project area based on the environmental monitoring report being developed by Ecological Associates. We will review and revise the Environmental Monitoring plan developed for the initial project as necessary. No additional field work is proposed as part of this effort We will coordinate with the County and Ecological Associates regarding sea turtle nesting data and any wildlife surveys conducted on site. This data will be incorporated into the permit application. No additional field work is proposed as part of this effort. We anticipate that this project can be covered by the Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (SPBO). We will coordinate with USFWS regarding any additional information required to apply the Biological Opinion. Unfortunately, the SPBO does not include consultation on piping plovers. Separate consultation on piping plovers (W may be required. 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 88 (W We will explain how the project will affect the coastal system. It is envisioned that the Preliminary Project Design and Feasibility Report will provide much of the support for this portion of the permit application discussion. We will describe the envisioned construction methodology and how turbidity control measures will be instituted to minimize adverse effects to water quality. We will also explain methods to protect threatened and endangered species. We will refer to the Environmental Monitoring Plan and the latest Environmental Monitoring'Report regarding future monitoring requirements and mitigation planning. The County will be responsible for the JCP application fee. This cost is not included in CPE's cost for this work. We will complete the Notice of Receipt. We will follow guidance provided by the FDEP with respect to the filing convention and submittal requirements. We will follow-up with the FDEP to ensure receipt and distribution of the JCP application. We will also document the timeline for review and attempt to provide unofficial responses when and where possible to avoid Requests for Additional Information. The FDEP and USACE will issue a public notice. The USACE will generally issue the public notice themselves but ask for assistance with ensuring the notice is correct. The FDEP will return a public notice and request that the County publish it in the local newspaper and then submit documentation that it was published. CPE will coordinate with the agencies regarding the public notice. It is assumed that the County has a contract with the local newspaper(s) and will address the FDEP publication requirements. Deliverables The JCP permit application and the associated attachments will be submitted to the County and FDEP as follows. 1. Four (4) hard copies of the permit application package will be prepared. One original and two copies are submitted to the FDEP. The last copy will be for the County's records. 2. An electronic copy of the application will be submitted on three DVD's (2 for the agencies and one for the County). Schedule It is estimated that 45 days will be required to complete the permit application and develop the necessary documentation once the pre-application meetings are held. Cost The cost to develop and submit the permit application package is $22,598. A breakdown of the hours and expenses to develop these costs is attached and follow the terms of CPE's agreement with Indian River County. Response to Requests for Additional Information The FDEP has 90 days to review the application and either issue a Notice of Intent to issue the permit or issue a Request for Additional Information (RAI). FDEP RAIs will also include comments from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission,other State agencies and the general public. 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 89 The USACE does not have a timeline requiring their response but may also submit a request for additional information. USACE RAIs may also include questions from USFWS,NOAA-NMFS, other Federal agencies and the general public. Ideally, we will try to provide an unofficial response to the agencies by coordinating with them during the initial period of review. However, some questions may require an official, written response. We will coordinate with the County on the extent of the response and what the implication may be to the permitting process and construction. Sometimes,the RAI will contain cost implications due to an expanded monitoring or mitigation requirement. We will draft a response and submit this to the County for review prior to submittal to the agencies with a copy to the County. Deliverables Three hard copy responses to the RAI,along with an electronic copy,will be prepared. Two copies will be sent to the agencies while one will be submitted to the County. Schedule The schedule for the response to the RAI is dependent on the extent of the questions. We will attempt to respond to the questions within 14 days of receipt of a NTP from the County to begin the work. We will inform the County if we are unable to meet this schedule due to the extent of response required. Cost The cost to develop and submit a response to each RAI is$3,984,which includes one response to the FDEP and one response to the USACE. We will coordinate with the County upon receipt of an RAI and determine whether the cost (W included herein is representative of the extent of work required to develop the response. We have included two responses in the overall cost proposal for planning purposes. Each RAI response will be a separate NTP item from the County. CPE will not begin work on the RAI until the County issues a NTP. Construction Plans and Specifications Construction plans and specifications are required as part of the JCP permit application. However, we will request that these be included as a Notice to Proceed item by the FDEP and USACE. Thus they will be submitted after the Notice of Intent to Issue is received. Development of the construction plans and specifications will be initiated once the permits have been issued and the County has chosen to move forward with construction. Plans and specifications will provide the necessary details to the contractor to construct the project, establish payment criteria, and adhere to the permit conditions. The documents will be submitted to FDEP and USACE to fulfill the permit application requirements upon their completion. It is recommended that the County resurvey the borrow area to ensure that there have been no changes and that adequate volumes still remain. The cost of the field work is not included in this scope of work. Front end documents to assist bid solicitation and award, outline contractual obligations, and define the responsible parties and their roles will be developed in conjunction with the construction plans and specifications. The County will provide their front end documents for inclusion into the bid package. This scope of work does not included assistance with bid solicitation or oversight during construction. If these services are requested by the County,they will be included under a separate work order. (W 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 90 (W Deliverables CPE will provide the following deliverables: 1. One (1) hard copy (8.5"x11" for the specs and 11"x17" for the plans) and one electronic (PDF format) of the front-end documents, construction plans, and specifications for the County's review and comments. 2. Two (2) hard copies (8.5"x11" for the specs and 11"x17" for the plans) of the final the front-end documents,construction plans,and specifications. Schedule Upon receipt of the County's notice to proceed,it is anticipated that 30 days will be required to develop of the front- end documents,construction plans,and specifications. At such time,a draft of the documents will be provided to the County for its review and comments. Once the comments are returned to CPE, the finalized documents addressing the comments will be submitted to the County within 10 days. Cost The cost to develop the construction plans and specifications is $12,495. A breakdown of the hours and expenses to develop these costs is attached and follow the terms of CPE's agreement with Indian River County. Optional FDEP or USACE Visit Interaction with the FDEP and USACE is currently proposed using teleconference capabilities. However, should issues arise that cannot be resolved via regular correspondence and conference calls, then CPE would recommend (W that a face-to-face meeting be held in FDEP's offices in Tallahassee to discuss the issues. Depending on the nature of the comments, the meeting with the USACE might be in either the West Palm Beach office or Jacksonville. The meeting may also be held in USFWS office in Vero Beach. CPE will prepare for,attend and lead this meeting. Prior to arranging this meeting,CPE will discuss the need for this meeting with Indian River County. This meeting will be a separate Notice to Proceed Item. Deliverables CPE will prepare for, attend and lead the meeting. CPE will develop meeting minutes and circulate these to all attendees. The minutes will be provided in PDF format. Schedule The schedule will be determined based on FDEP and USACE availability following Indian River County authorization to begin. Cost The cost for a meeting in Tallahassee or Jacksonville will be the same. There will be no cost to the County, beyond the cost for a Response to an RAI,if the meeting is held within or south of Indian River County (ie an NTP for an optional visit will not be required). It is assumed that attempts to address an issue would have been addressed by a response to an RAI prior to requiring a meeting. The cost to prepare,attend,and lead the meeting is $5,618. A breakdown of the hours and expenses to develop these (W costs is attached and follow the terms of CPE's agreement with Indian River County. 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 91 (W Summary CPE will proceed with developing the project redesign and permitting the project upon receipt of a purchase order from Indian River County. We will proceed and work diligently to meet the proposed schedule barring any unforeseen circumstances. However, many aspects of the project permitting and agency review are outside the control of CPE. The schedule for this proposal is dependent upon agency review and issuance of the requested permits. Thus,it provided as a guideline. Deviations from the schedule or costs may arise due to unforeseen issues or permitting implications. CPE will strive to maintain the schedule and costs as reasonably can be expected. CPE will coordinate with the County on the permitting progress and schedule. All work will be performed following provisions of the Professional Coastal Engineering Services Agreement, dated March 19,2013 between Indian River County and Coastal Planning&Engineering,Inc.,A CB&I Company. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, G on G.Thomson,P.E.,D.CE Director Coastal Planning&Engineering,Inc. cc: Tom Campbell,CPE David Swigler,CPE Tom Pietro,CPE Sheri Dinidal,CPE Ann Range,CB&I 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A CB&I COMPANY 92 E B IT 2 TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF COSTS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SECTOR 3 DUNE AND BERM REPAIR PERMITTING TASK DESCRIPTION Task Order Cost 1 PRELIMINARY PROJECT DESIGN AND FEASIBILITY REP $11,747 2 JCP PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS $5,991 3 UPDATE THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT $7,594 4 JCP APPLICATION $22,598 5 RESPONSE TO RAIs(2) $7,967 6 CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS $12,495 7 OPTIONAL FDEP OR USACE VISIT $5,618 MAXIMUM WORK ORDER COSTI $74,010 Cost Breakdown-WO#2-5-30-13.xls INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA • BOARD MEMORANDUM r TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH:kChristopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Direct Christopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Engine Michael D. Nixon, P.E., Roadway Production Managerol FROM: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Project Engineer Aw SUBJECT: Civil Engineering and Land Surveying Agreement for Bridge Replacements and Widening of 66th Avenue from South of SR60 to North of 57th Street, AMENDMENT NO. 13 IRC Project No. 0545 DATE: June 6, 2013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Arcadis US, Inc. (formally known as Arcadis G&M, Inc)is under contract with Indian River Countyto provide Civil Engineering and Land Surveying Services for Bridge Replacements and Widening of 66th Avenue from South of SR60 to North of 57th Street. The original Agreement was approved by (W the Board of County Commissioners on September 6,2005 in the amount of$631,700.00. Twelve amendments have been approved to date, bringing the total to $2,183,887.21. Amendment No. 13 provides for design changes needed during the construction phase of the project. The changes outlined in the subject amendment are primarily changes to the water main and re-use water mains. The Engineer will perform an inspection once a week to satisfy the construction completion certification required by FDEP. Also included in the amendment is the extension of the water main on 33rd Street approximately 500-LF to the west. Unforeseen modifications to the construction plans have been performed and the approved construction engineering allowance has been significantly reduced. Since the project is in the early stage of completion, an hourly not-to-exceed amount of $20,000 is requested for any further unexpected design related services. The total cost for Amendment No. 13 is an hourly not-to-exceed amount of$30,446.24 for construction related services, in which $10,446.24 is construction related services for Utilities and $20,000.00 for Public Works. The Amendment raises the total contract amount from $2,183,887.21 to $2,214,333.45. (W F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\0545-66Th Ave SR60 to 57th St(Arcadis)1Admim\agenda items\Amendment No.13 June 18 2013.doc 94 PAGE 2 Bridge Replacements and Widening of 66th Avenue from (W . South of SR60 to North of 57th Street,AMENDMENT NO. 13 For June 18, 2013 BCC Meeting FUNDING Funding for Amendment No. 13 is budgeted and available from Traffic Impact Fees/District II/66th Ave-SR 60 to 49th Street-Account# 10215241-066510-06040 in the amount of$20,000 and from Utilities WIP Acct.#472-169000-13503-66th Avenue Water Main (26th Street to 49th Street)in the amount of$10,446.24. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the attached Amendment No. 13 authorizing the above-mentioned professional services and requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Amendment No. 13 on their behalf for a total not-to-exceed amount of$ 30,446.24. ATTACHMENT (W Amendment No. 13 DISTRIBUTION Approved Date Administration d e3 3 Hank Deibel, P.E., Arcadis US, Inc. Budget 6 !► 13 Legal Public Works I APPROVED AGENDA ITEM utilities Engineering FOR:June 18, 2013 BY: L F.Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\0545-66Th Ave SR60 to 57th St(Arcadis)\Admim\agenda items\Amendment No.13 June 18 2013.doc 95 BRIDGE REPLACEMENTS AND WIDENING OF 66'"H AVENUE (W FROM SOUTH OF SR 60 TO NORTH OF 57TH STREET IRC PROJECT NUMBER 0545 PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERING, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING SERVICES AMENDMENT NO. 13 TO THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING/LAND SURVEYING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN ARCADIS US, Inc. AND INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA. This is an amendment to the existing Engineering/Land Surveying Services Agreement (AGREEMENT) dated September 6, 2005 between ARCADIS US, Inc. (ENGINEER) and Indian River County (COUNTY). This amendment addresses changes in "Section I — Project Limits and Description"and "Section V- Compensation". Amendment Description This Amendment includes the following: ".SECTION I-PROJECT LIMITS AND DESCRIPTION"is being modified to incorporate the following: Plans have beenP �r ared for the construction of 66'x'Avenue from south of SR 60 to north of 57a' Street. Included in the project is the construction of a 12 inch diameter water main on 33d Street.Also included is the construction of water main and reuse water main crossings at 33rd Street, 37' Street,45'x'Street, and 49`x' Street, and the relocation of an existing force main at 33rd Street. The COUNTY has requested that the ENGINEER revise the plans to extend the water main construction on 33rd Street an additional 500 feet to the west, and provide a final certification for these facilities to FDEP upon completion of the construction. In order to provide the construction completion certification, the ENGINEER will perform periodic inspections of the progress of the work. It is our understanding that the COUNTY will perform daily inspections of the contractor's operations to confirm that the utility lines are constructed in accordance with COUNTY standards. The ENGINEER will perform site inspections on a weekly basis during the installation of the utility lines to observe the contractors operations and confirm that the utility improvements are constructed in accordance with the project plans. In addition, the ENGINEER will attend construction progress meetings as requested by the COUNTY, and will provide engineering services on an as requested basis during construction to address questions and requests for additional information and to address unforeseen construction issues that may arise. The estimated hourly not to exceed fee included in this supplement is based on providing professional engineering services for six hours per week (two site visits per week) during a 16 week construction time period (16 hours Project (w Engineering Manager & 96 hours Sr. Field Coordinator). Additional time is included for the Page 1 of 4 GALNR Support\ADMEq\Markedng\Proposals\WPB\,013\66 th Ave Amendment No 13 5-30-13 .doe 96 preparation of the final certifications, addressing contractor's request for information, and other miscellaneous duties. "SECTION IV—TIME FOR COMPLETION" is being modified to incorporate the following: The time for completion of Amendment Number 13 shall run concurrently with the construction of this project. "SECTION V—COMPENSATION"is being modified to incorporate the following: The COUNTY agrees to pay and the ENGINEER agrees to accept for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement fees in accordance with the following: A. Professional Services Fee 1. The basic compensation mutually agreed upon by the ENGINEER and the COUNTY follows: The following is a summary of costs. Charge Associated with Change in Project Scope New Total And Pro&ct Limits Compensation Geotechnical Services(71:erra)(Lump Sum) «.............................:.$0.00 $139,460.00 Engineering(ARCADIS) (Lump Sum)i.........................................$0.00 $953,975.50 Signal Plans(ARCADIS)................................................................$0.00 $84,726.66 Design Survey(66`h Avenue) (ARCADIS)....................................... $0.00 $169,500.00 Design Survey(Sidestreets)(ARCADIS)......................................... $0.00 $71,428.00 Right-of-Way Survey and Map(66*Avenue).................................$0.00 $117,$21.00 Right-of-way Survey(Sidestreets)....................................................$0.00 $61,963.00 Structural Design for 4 bridges (Bridge Design Associates,Inc.)...................................................... $0.00 $207,222.00 Landscape&Irrigation.................................................................... $0.00 $77,160.00 (Thomas Lucido&Associates) (Lump Sum) Pond Surveys..............a......awYNfe.1....... ........................i.ui'............ $0.00 $25,79000 Page 2 of 4 G:\LNR Support\ADMIT'I\Marketing\Proposals\wPB\2013\66 th Ave Amendment No 13 5-30-13 .doc (W Water Main Plans ARCADIS ................ ............$0.00 , ( )...................... ... $86145.00 (Lump Sum) Corridor Study(ARCADIS).....;.............*..................:....:.....:::.......$0.00 $15,581.00 Cultural Resource Assessment........:........:.........::.:....,....,,:,;,.......$0.00 $8,925.93 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES........................y...,...,......... $0.00 $2,019,698.09 HO URL Y RA TE ALLO WANCES Allowance for Sketch and Legal Descriptions and staking of parcels(3 75.001each)................NTE$0.00 $51,000.00 Allowance for miscellaneous roadway design changes due to right of way negotiations...............................NTE$0.00 $20,-000,00 Allowance for Survey Crew and Soft Dig Machine for Horizontal and Vertical Utility Locations at Potential Conflicts (Survey$1121Hr)......................................................................NTE$0.00 $20,000.00 (W Allowance for Survey and Design Of a transition to match the existing pavement At the north end of the project...............................................:.NTE$0.00 $27,000.00 Construction Engineering Services-Public Works ....NTE$20,000.00 $77,877.12 Construction Engineering Services-Utility Dept......... NTE$10,446.24 $10,446.24 TOTAL HO URL Y RA TE ALLO WANCES...................NTE$30,446.24 $206,323.36 Compensation for the hourly rate allowances will be made on an hourly basis at the hourly rates listed below: Project Engineer Manager..............................................$146.64 Project Engineer...............................................................$109.70 Senior CADD Operator....................................:...:...........»$85.84 CaddDraftsman......................».......................................... $56.89 Survey Project Manigger..:....................0...........................$106.40 Professional Surpoor..... ...................:...:...::...:.:::..::....... $98.30 Survey CADD Tech................................:............................ $68.17 3 Man Field Crew. .......,. ...................................$126.84 2 Man Field Crew.....::.:..........:.........:..............:....:.......... $114.14 Le Sr. Field Coordinator......................................................... $75.00 Page 3 of 4 G:\LNR Support\ADMIN\Marketing\Proposals\WPB\2013\66 th Ave Amendment No 13 5-30-13 .doe The AGREEMENT is hereby amended as specifically set forth here in. All other sections of the AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect and are incorporated herein. This Amendment No. 13 to the AGREEMENT regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and constructed by the laws of the State of Florida. In witness whereof the parties have executed this Amendment this day of 52013. ARCADIS U , IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 2081 Vis ay Suite 200 West Pa Be h 33411 By: c By: Ro e Lawson,P.E. Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ice President Board of County Commissioners WITNESSED BY: Approved by BCC (W Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: County Attorney Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency YsephA. Baird, nty Administrator Page 4 of 4 GALNR Support\ADMIN\Marketing\Proposals\WPB\2013\66 th Ave Amendment No 13 5-8-13 .doc 99 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM U�t K TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: /14c' hristopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Directo FROM: hristopher J. Kafer,Jr., P.E., County Enginee�w SUBJECT: Release of Retainage- Professional Services Agreement with Carter Associates, Inc. IRC Project No. 9810B 66th Avenue Paving Improvements, Phase 2 (4th Street to 16th Street) DATE: June 4, 2013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Indian River County entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Carter Associates,Inc.on November 17, 1998 for the above subject project and eighteen (18) amendments have been executed for additional services, bringing the current total for the Agreement to$706,925.00. The original agreement stated "a 10% retainage will be withheld by the COUNTY until Final Payment." To date, Indian River County has withheld$61,685.68 in retainage. Carter Associates, Inc. has requested release of retainage for completed design-related services. Carter Associates, Inc. has submitted Application for Payment No. 10311-2, dated June 4, 2013, in the amount of $57,600.68 for release of retainage for completed design related services. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available from the following accounts: Traffic Impact Fees, District 2 Retainage Account No. 102-206000-00009 66th Avenue (SR60 to 5th Street SW) ($4,673.82) Utilities Retainage Account No.471-206000-10506 66th Ave Water Main Conflict(4th St—12th St) ($749.00) Secondary Roads Gas Tax Retainage Account No. 109-206000-00009 66th Avenue (SR60 to 5th Street SW) ($18,730.08) Traffic Impact Fees, District 2 Retainage Account No. 102-206000-06021 66th Avenue (12th Street to SR60) ($28,668.77) Secondary Roads Gas Tax Retainage Account No. 109-206000-06021 66th Avenue (12th Street to SR60) ($3,492.95) Optional Sales Tax/Road & Bridge Account No. 315-206000-06021 66th Avenue (12th Street—SR60) ($1,286.06) FAPubk Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\9810&66th Ave Ph 2 4th St to 16th St\Admhnlegenda items\9810 BCC Agn Release Retainage 06-04-2013.doc 100 PAGE TWO Release of Retainage Carter Associates, Inc. FOR BCC Agenda June 18, 2013 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends partial release of retainage to Carter Associates,Inc.forthe completed services and payment of Application of Payment No. 10311-2, dated June 4, 2013 in the amount of $57,600.68. ATTACHMENTS 1. Application for Payment No. 10311-2 from Carter Associates, Inc. dated June 4, 2013 DISTRIBUTION 1. Carter Associates, Inc. 2. Indian River County Utilities (W APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR June 18, 2013 Indian rover County 4 prov Date Administration BY "Aw6 I 1 (S Budget Legal 3 Utilities �►'rJ-'I Public Works Engineering 13 L FAftH c Wo&s\ENGMERING DMS10N PROJECTS\9810B-66th Ave Ph 24th St to 16th St\Admim\agenda items\9810 BCC A8n Release Retainage 06-04-2013.doc 101 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 103 R 2 through (W AMENDMENT NO. 18 66TH AVENUE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SR 60 AND 4TH STREET IRC PROJECT NO. 9810 To: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Contract for WORK ORDER NO.4 TO THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT-INDIANRIVER COUNTY-66THAVENUE PAVINGAND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SR 60 AND 4TH STREET INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT No.9810 For Work accomplished through the date of June 4,2013 Design Tasks Contract Percent Amount Previously Retainage Amount Complete Invoiced Amount Due Original Contract(Inc.Amend#1 &#2) $178.820.00 100.00 $ 178,820.00 $ 17,882.00 Final Design&Permitting(Amend.#3) $93,000.00 100.00 $ 93,000.00 $ 9,300.00 Final Design&Permitting(Amend.#4) $30,640.00 100.00 $ 30,640.00 $ 3,064.00 Amendment#5 $21,460.00 100.00 $ 21,460.00 $ 2,146.00 mendment#6 $56,135.00 100.00 $ 56,135.00 $ 5,613.50 Amendment#7 $2,790.00 100.00 $ 2,790.00 $ 279.00 Amendment#8 $28,110.0 100.00 $ 28,110.00 $ 2,811.00 Amendment#9 $40,480.0 100.00 $ 40,480.00 $ 4,048.00 Amendment#10 $73,980.00 100.00 $ 73,980.00 $ 7,398.00 Amendment# 11 $31,030.00 100.00 $ 31,030.00 $ 3,103.00 Amendment#12 $23,700.00 100.00 $ 23,700.00 $ 2,370.00 Amendment# 12—T&M $9,830.001 100.00 $ 9,830.00 $ 983.00 Amendment# 13—T&M $28,000.0 100.00 $ 27,990.00 $ 2,799.00 Amendment# 14—T&M $30,000. 100.00 $ 29,991.20 $ 2,999.12 Amendment# 15 $7,490.00 100.00 $ 7,490.00 $ 749.00 Amendment# 16 Task#1 —TRC Bridge Design 1 $6,-3'00.001 100.00 1 $ 6,300.00 $ 630.00 AMOUNT OF RETAINAGE $ 66,174.62 (10%of Total Gross Contract Amount Due for Design Tasks) MINUS AMOUNT OF RETAINAGE PREVIOUSLY RELEASED $ -8,573.94 5%of Gross Contract Amount Invoiced through 03/29/02) AMOUNT DUE THIS PAY REQUEST (Contract Amount Earned To Date minus Total Amount Paid to Engineer Prior To This $ 57,600.68 Pay Request) JAInvoices(Eng.)\AR\98-23A Rev-2 Appi for Paymt for Retainage on Design Fees 2013-05-30 102 OA ATTACHMENT 1 (W CONSULTANT'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT No. 103 R 2 through AMENDMENT NO. 18 66TH AVENUE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN SR 60 AND 4TH STREET IRC PROJECT NO. 9810 ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION: THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFIES that I have checked and verified the above Application for Payment No. 103 R_2 and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is a true and correct statement of work performed and/or material supplied by the ENGINEER;that all work and/or materials included in the Application for Payment have been inspected by me and/or by my duly authorized representative or assistants;that it has been performed and/or supplied in full accordance with the requirements of the referenced Contract and with sound engineering practice and judgment;and that the payment amount claimed and requested by the ENGINEER is correctly computed on the basis of work performed andlor materials supplied to date. THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE ALSO CERTIFIES that all previous progress payments received from the COUNTY on account of Work done under the Contract referred to above have been applied on account to discharge ENGINEER'S legitimate obligations incurred in connection with Work covered by prior Applications for Payment numbered I through 102 inclusive;and if this is a Final Pay Request, I further certify that all persons doing work upon or furnishing materials or supplies for this project under this (W foregoing Contract have been paid in full. Dated: June 4, 2013 Engineer: CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 1708 21st Street / Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772)562-4191 State of Florida County of Indian River Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4th day of June 2013 I*YL Rotary Public My Commission expires: 09/23/2016 �� Notary Public State of Florida Joan M Ross +� My Commission EE 837713 p� Expires 08/2312016 (W JAInvoices(Eng.)\AR\98-23A Rev-2 Appl for Paymt for Retainage on Design Fees 2013-05-30 103 C.3w INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM Department of General Services (W Date: June 9,2013 To: The Honorable Board of County Commissioners Thru: Joseph A.Baird, County Administrator Thru: Michael C. Zito,Assistant County Administrator From: Brad Bernauer,Human Services Director Subject: Renewal of Florida Power& Light(FP&L) Care To Share Agreement BACKGROUND: Attached, is a copy of a proposed renewal agreement to be entered into between Florida Power and Light (FP&L) and Indian River County. The "Care To Share" program is established by FP&L via contributions from the electrical utility's customers to provide emergency energy assistance to low- income residents in Indian River County who are in special need of emergency funding to pay a delinquent power bill from FP&L. In the last five years, FP&L has provided a total of$181,559 which averages out to $36,311 per year of assistance to qualified residents of Indian River County. FP&L would like to extend their contract for one(1) year. Pursuant to this renewal agreement, FP&L's Assistance and Referral Representatives (ASSIST Reps)will (W serve as the utility's primary liaison on a day-to-day basis with the County's Human Service Department. FP&L has found the "Care To Share" Program to be a great match for other Health and Human Services type departments. The program tends to align well with the missions of these departments to assist residents in need and help foster self-sufficiency. The FP&L program is intended to be a funding option of last resort after all Federal and State resources have been used. Staff has found this program to be relatively easy to administer and does not cause any significant burden on existing staff. The program will continue providing a source of non-governmental funds that can be used to help citizens in a energy crisis situation and will continue to supplement public funding that is provided through the Human Services operation of Indian River County. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board's approval of the Care To Share one year extension of the Agreement with Florida Power and Light and authorization for the Chairman to execute the Agreement. Approved Agenda Item Indian River Co. Approved Date For: Administration 9Z3ig County Attorne • z- B Budget Department Risk Management 104 17- o(9 Florida Power& Light Company FPL CARE TO SHARE®AGREEMENT—INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 1N EAST SERVICE AREA (W July, 2008—July, 2013 THIS FPL CARE TO SHARE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into between FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as "FPL" and INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida hereinafter referred to as the "Agency." To assist the emergency needs of people in times of hardship, FPL and its customers are providing a contribution fund known as the "Care To Share"fund for electric utility payment. As a condition to this agreement becoming effective, the Agency administering the Care To Share funds will provide emergency energy assistance to residents in Indian River County. The Agency will serve as the administrator and lead service provider for the program and will be asked to coordinate with any other FPL Care To Share service provider(s) in the county, as designated by FPL. The relationship between the Agency and any other FPL Care To Share provider(s) can be formalized through an agreement between the lead Agency and the other provider(s). The Agency also will work with any other appropriate social service providers in its area by sharing program information and promoting broad access to these community (W resources through the formal FPL Care To Share structure. Potential recipients shall have equal opportunity for assistance, and assistance remains available twelve months per year. As a condition to this Agreement becoming effective, the Agency represents and warrants to FPL that it is a political subdivision of the State of Florida within the meaning of Article VIII, section1 of the Constitution Of The State Of Florida. The Agency will determine the eligibility of energy assistance recipients, subject to the Care to Share program standards. These standards cannot be added to or deviated from without the prior consent of the appropriate FPL Area Special Consumer Services Manager. No person shall subjected to discrimination in connection with the FPL Care To Share program on the basis of age, gender, disability, race, color, creed, national origin, religion, or ancestry contrary to applicable law. The Agency signing this Agreement does hereby bind itself to the following terms and conditions: 1. Eligibility Requirements Potential recipients must contact the administering Agency to receive preliminary screening and to make an appointment with the Agency representative when appropriate. An eligible recipient is one who meets all the following criteria: 1. Applicant must physically reside in FPL's service area. 1 105 r % 2. Applicant must have an account with FPL or reside at the service location. W 3. Must have identification with the same address as the FPL account. Some examples include: a driver's license showing the FPL service address; a rent receipt showing the client's name at the FPL service address; a water or phone bill in the client's name showing the FPL service address; a mortgage statement showing the client's name and the FPL service address. 4. Must show proof of a family or personal crisis. 5. Must have a delinquent FPL bill, final notice, or disconnect notice for the FPL account. Current bill is also eligible, if caseworker deems appropriate. 6. Must have exhausted all other available sources for payment of electric service. After available State and Federal funds for which the applicant qualifies have been applied for or committed, the Care To Share funds may be used. The exception is when the applicant is in imminent danger of losing electricity and time does not allow applying for State and Federal funds. 7. Household income level should fall at or below 150% of the Federal poverty level. The income of all persons residing at the service address are to be included in household income. The administering Agency may exercise flexibility in expanding income limits based on special recipient situations. 8. If assistance is provided, applicant must have a plan in place to maintain additional/future household expenses. 9. Applicant or member of applicant's household, either together or individually, must not have received a benefit under the Care To Share Program within the last twelve months. 10.*Applicant or member of applicant's household must not have a history of fraud or service tampering. This may include, but not limited to, using a minor or fictitious name, unauthorized connecting of the meter,or tampering with the service in any way. * Note:FPL views fraud and service tampering very seriously. If a client with a history of fraud or service tampering is permitted to receive an FPL Care To Share Program commitment, FPL reserves the right to pursue payment from the customer for any charges related to the fraud or service tampering activity. None of those charges can be paid for by FPL Care To Share Program funds. II. Care To Share Application and Documentation 1. Potential recipient's current participation in A.F.D.C., Medicaid, S.S.I., food stamps, and public housing may be used for means testing. 2 (W 106 2. Caseworkers should verify"self-declaration" of recipient's income based on r established Agency guidelines to limit inappropriate disbursements. 3. The Agency's standard intake form will be utilized for the Care To Share program. 4. Approved applications, as well as disapproved applications, will be maintained as required under the Florida Administrative Code as may be amended. III. Care to Share Payment Requirements 1. All FPL charges with the exception of deposits, non-electric optional products and services, return check fees, and additional billings resulting from service tampering (non-inherited current diversion charges) are eligible for the program. Late payment fees assessed to customer accounts during the time Agency's disbursement process to the utility is pending are eligible for the pro-gram. 2. If funds are available, and the recipient has no other means to pay, the Agency must pay the entire delinquent amount up to the currently prescribed upper limit, as determined by FPL. While this limit can be increased or decreased at the discretion of FPL, the upper limit as of the date of this Agreement is $500. (W 3. No recipient or a member of recipient's household, either together or individually, may receive more than a one-time benefit in a 12 (twelve) month period up to the prescribed upper limit, as referenced in item III-2. No recipient or member of recipients household may circumvent this limitation by changing account names among themselves or by moving to a new location. 4. Disbursement of funds by the Agency must be by check payable to Florida Power& Light Company and must be received by FPL's Payment Processing Center no more than 60 days from the commitment date. 5. Payment must be submitted in the name of the FPL customer of record. 6. Exceptions to the requirements listed above require the approval of the appropriate FPL Area Special Consumer Services Manager. IV. Public Energy Assistance Programs The Care To Share Program is designed to fill voids in existing energy assistance programs that have exhausted their resources or where recipient's needs exceed program limits. Caseworkers should contact and document efforts to link recipient with LIHEAP, EHEAEP, and National Food and Shelter (FEMA) program energy funds. 3 107 V. FPL/Agency Interface (W FPL will solicit its customers to contribute to the "Care To Share" Emergency Energy Assistance Fund via the customer's monthly electric statement and may as an option supplement customer.contributions with corporate contributions. FPL will determine in its sole discretion the method by which contributions will be collected. FPL will collect and distribute these funds to the administrative Agency proportional to the amount of donations received in the area to which the Agency has agreed to provide program services. FPL corporate contributions will be distributed to the administrative Agency at the discretion of FPL. FPL will work closely with the Agency on timing of Agency funding. FPL funds will be disbursed to the Agency on a quarterly basis. Commitments must be itemized using an FPL Payment Transmittal form or computer generated facsimile of the FPL Payment Transmittal form. FPL Transmittal envelopes must be used when remitting agency payment and FPL Transmittal forms. In some cases agencies may not be able to use the Transmittal envelope because of their accounting system. In those cases the assigned ASSIST P.O. Box 02-5231, Miami FL 33102-5231 must be used. No deductions from contributions will be made for overhead, salaries, administrative costs or any other expense incurred by the Agency. FPL's Assistance and Referral Representatives (ASSIST Reps)will serve as the utility's primary liaison on a day-to-day basis with Agency caseworkers concerning billing inquiries. ASSIST Reps will be contacted in a timely manner concerning committed program funds for each recipient. FPL Area Special Consumer Services Managers, as listed in this agreement, may serve as alternate contacts when necessary, and will serve as primary contact persons concerning the on-going administration of the program. Special Consumer Services Managers have the authority to consider exceptions to the FPL Care To Share Program requirements. These are considered on a case-by-case basis. The agency will encourage energy conservation through referral of the client to FPL's free energy survey service (1-800-DIAL FPL) and by distributing FPL conservation information when appropriate. The agency will also encourage FPL's various billing and payment options as appropriate for the recipient, including FPL 62PIus, Friendly Reminder and Budget Billing. VI. Auditing The appropriate Agency designee will routinely review recipient files and the program process. The Agency will include the Care To Share fund in its internal auditing schedule and report any significant irregularities to FPL. In addition,the Agency, and/or its designees, will provide to the FPL area contact representative, on a quarterly basis * (due April 15, July 15, Oct.-15 and Jan. 15) copies of FPL Transmittal forms indicating the following: (W 4 108 I. Total recipients served during the preceding quarter by county. 2. Total amount disbursed during the preceding quarter by county. 3. Beginning balance in Care To Share fund, by county. 4. Care To Share funds provided to each county. 5. Total amount remaining in Care To Share fund, by county. Copies of quarterly audit reports will be provided to the Agency by the FPL area contact employee. In addition, when an agency employee is to receive assistance, the Administrator of the Indian River County Health Department must contact the FPL Area Special Consumer Services Manager in advance for approval. Please note that FPL may request monthly reporting from the agency to further monitor program activity and program funds balance. VII. General The Agency and FPL personnel will strive to provide this community resource with a high degree of professionalism, reflecting positively on the program's donors, FPL and the Agency administrator. The Agency and FPL have named the following designees for purposes of this (W Agreement: FPL State Contact: Indian River County Contact: Louis Gonzalez Jason Brown, Coordinator, Special Consumer Services Director of the Office of P. O. Box 029100 Management and Budget Miami, FL 33102-9100 1801 27th Street (305) 552-3274 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (772)226-1214 FPL East Service Area Contact: Human Services Contact Dianne Verner Bradley Bemauer Special Consumer Services Human Services Program Manager P. O. Box 8768 c/o Gifford Health Center West Palm Beach, FL 33407 4675 2e Court (561).640-2540 Vero Beach, Florida 32967 (772)226-1422 Upon its execution, this Agreement shall supersede any previous agreements and remain in force for five years—from July 1, 2008,through and including July 1, 2013. Either party has the right at any time on ninety (90)days written notice to the other to terminate or amend the Agreement. Should this happen, any remaining funds will be (W s 109 returned to FPL along with an accounting. (W The Parties understand this program is designed to be flexible"6-"6of the community, and modifications may be made from time t4-tn. olo make the'pragram more effective. Any modifications to this Agreement must t .li;iiital agreexne>7t:of the Parties in form of a written amendment. ; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Florida Power& Light Company oind.th&Agency&a0 I'd this Agreement to be executed on the date indicated below. %� 2:;;�•.....•,,,.• ; Provider: Agency: FPL,Florida Power&Light Company Indian River County Board of County Commissioners By. B Coordi or,Special Con er ervices Sandra L. Bowden , Chairman Approved by BCC: (Date) dune 17, 2008 Address: Florida Power&Light Company Attest: Jeffrey K.Barton,Clerk of Circuit Court P.O.Box 029100 Miami,FL33102-9100 Le v4 Date: k� 1 -3 ( QV By. Deputy Clerk Approved: By: Joseph A. Baird County Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Y: 1 7 4-eo� - --% Marian E. Fell Senior Assistant County Attorney 6 110 AGENDA COPY Florida Power& Light Company (W FPL CARE TO SHARE® PROGRAM Indian River County Interim Amendment—July 1St, 2013 THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into by and between FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as "FPL" and Indian River County, hereinafter referred to as the "Agency." WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a previous agreement dated July, 2008 — July, 2013, providing for a contribution fund known as the FPL Care To Share Program to assist qualified residents in times of hardship with emergency assistance in paying electric bills; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Amendment to extend the terms of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, this Amendment is necessary and reasonable under the circumstances, and is in the best interest of the public; NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual terms, conditions, promises and covenants (W hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows: 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as if set forth in full hereunder. 2. The Agreement Term and Time for Performance is amended as follows: The term of this Agreement shall begin on the date the last party executes the Amendment and ends on July 1, 2014, unless terminated earlier by either party as provided for herein. 3. This Amendment shall be effective upon full execution by the Parties. 4. Multiple copies of this Amendment may be executed by the Parties, each of which, bearing original signatures, shall have the force and effect of an original document. (Remainder of this page intentionally left blank) Care To Share Agreement—Rev 3 19 08.doc Page 1 111 AGENDA COPY (W FPL Care To Share Program Amendment to existing agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have made and executed this Amendment to Agreement: INSERT AGENCY NAME HERE and FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, as signed below by persons duly authorized to execute same. Provider Agency FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Special Consumer Services Area Manager Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Approved by BCC on: ,2013. Florida Power& Light Company INDIAN RIVER COUNTY P. O. Box 029100 1801 27TH STREET Miami, FL 33102-9100 Vero Beach, FL 32960 (W Date: Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Circuit Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal suffi iency: Approved: r��GG—, By: By. Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney Joseph A Baird, County Administrator (W Care To Share Agreement—Rev 3 19 08.doc Page 2 112 CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (W PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: June 11,2013 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Jason Brown, Director, Office of Management and Bu get Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Service FROM: Jerry Davis, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Bid Award for IRC Bid No. 2013040 IRC Utility Services Roof Replacement Project BACKGROUND: The Department of Utility Services has requested the solicitation of bids for roof replacement project at the Hobart RO Plant, South County RO Plant, and South Regional Wastewater Treatment (W Facility. BID RESULTS: Bid Opening Date: May 30, 2013 Advertising Date: May 8, 2013 DemandStar Broadcast to: 261 Vendors Specifications Requested by: 16 Vendors Replies: 2 Vendors BID TABULATION: Gulf States Industries,Inc. New Port Richey,FL $249,500.00 Atlas Apex Roofing Fort Lauderdale,FL $349,000.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $309,000.00 The County's Consulting engineer, MBV Engineering, Inc., has reviewed both bids and has recommended that the bid be awarded to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Gulf States Industries, Inc., for a Total Bid Price of$249,500.00. FAPurchasing\Bids\2012-2013 FY(2013000)\2013040 Re-Roofing at Utilities PlantsWgenda-2013040.doc 113 CONSENT AGENDA SOURCE OF FUNDS: Funding for the Utility Services Roof Replacement Project in the amount of $249,500.00 is budgeted and available as follows: Account Number Account Name/Description Amount 47123536-044699-13508 NCRO/SCRO Roof Replacement (South County RO) $173,500.00 47123536-044699-13508 NCRO/SCRO Roof Replacement (North County RO) $53,000.00 47123536-044699-13509 SCWWTF Roof Replacement (South County Wastewater) $23,000.00 Total Cost $249,500.00 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends awarding this bid to Gulf States Industries, Inc., as the lowest most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the specifications as set forth in the invitation to bid. Staff further requests that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached sample agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute said agreement after receipt and approval of the required Public Construction Bond and certificate of insurance and after the County Attorney has approved the agreement as to form and legal sufficiency. ATTACHMENTS: Recommendation of Award Bid Tabulation Bid Submittal Sample Agreement APPROVED AGENDA ITEM • � Indian River Co Approved Datp �! Admin BY: Legal J eph A. aird, County Administrator Budget Department FOR: Risk Manager /� � (W F:\Purchasing\Bids\2012-2013 FY(2013000)\2013040 Re-Roofing at Utilities PlantsWgenda-2013040.doc 114 G RECEIVED Indian River County ►'�� Purchasing Division (W * k * 1 - 13PI OR��. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: June 11,2013 TO: Jerry Davis,Purchasing Manager THRU: Vincent Burke P.E.,Director of Utility Services FROM: Terry Southard,Operations Manager SUBJECT: Bid#2013040 IRC Utility Roof Replacement Projects Background:` The Department of Purchasing opened bids on May 30,2013 for Bid#2013040 IRC Utilities Roof Replacement Project. This bid included roof replacement at South RO Water Plant,North RO Water Plant,and South Regional (W Wastewater Plant. Two companies responded to the bid invitation. Bids Tabulation Gulf State Industries,Inc.New Port Richey,FL $249,500.00 Atlas Apex Roofing,Fort Lauderdale,FL $349,000.00 MBV Engineering,Inc the Departments Consultant reviewed both bids that were submitted for the IRCU Roof Replacement Project and have verified references. Based on the references and the information that was provided,it appears as though Gulf States Industries Inc. located in New Port Richey.Florida is the lowest,responsive,bidder and that the company appears to have the experience and qualification necessary to complete the specified work. Therefore,they recommend that the contract be awarded to Gulf States Industries,Inc. Fundin The projected Budget for this project was$309,000.00. Funds for this project are derived from the R&R funds in the operating budget.The Operating fund budget is derived from water and sewer revenues. Description Account Number Amount South County RO 47123536-044699-13508 $173,500.00 North County RO 47123536-044699-13508 $53,000.00 South County Wastewater 47123536-044699-13509 $23,000.00 Total Cost $249,500.00 Recommendation: (W Staff recommends the lowest bidder,Gulf State Industries,Inc.New Port Richey,FL,be awarded the#2013040 Bid for IRC Utility Services Roof Replacement Project for a price of$249,500.00. CADocuments and Settings\aobertautsch\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Conient.Outlook\XOW7294F\Memo to Jerry Davis Bid #2013040 Roof Project June 2013 v2.doc 115 Cfl r r INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Witness:Jennifer Hyde PURCHASING DIVISION Witness: Maeghan McLaughlin 1800 27th Street,Vero Beach,FL 32960 BID TABULATION C a W Bid Opening Date: Time: t� May 30,2013 2:OOPM oo p p� '3 Bid No. Department X 2013040 Utilities Bid Title a a IRC Utility Services Roof Replacement c Project fes+ G3 Z Bid Form Y Y Bid Bond Y Y Schedule of Subcontractors Y Y Disclosure Y Y General Bidder Information Y Y Base Bid Item 91 (South County RO) $ 254,000.00 $ 173,500.00 Base Bid Item#2 (Hobart RO) $ 69,000.00 $ 53,000.00 Base Bid Item #3 (South Reg WWTF) $ 26,000.00 $ 23,000.00PC u COMMENTS: (W Bid Form Roof Replacement Project at the Hobart RO Plant, South County RO Plant, and South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities Bid #: 2013040 Bid Opening Date and Time: May 30, 2013 2:00 P.M. Bid Opening Location: Purchasing Division 180027 th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 In accordance with all terms, conditions, specifications, and requirements, the Bidder offers the following: BASE BID ITEM NO.1 — SOUTH RO PLANT ROOF REPLACEMENT. For furnishing and delivering to the owner all materials, equipment and supplies necessary to complete the scope of work, and for all costs incurred in completing the work. All costs for materials including equipment and supplies, all other labor including but not limited to, mobilization, direct costs, taxes, insurance, overhead, profit, and all other miscellaneous costs necessary to complete the scope of work shall be included in the South RO Plant Roof Replacement Base Bid Item No. 1, except for those items specifically included in Bid items No. 2 and No. 3 below. Total Price (Base Bid Item No.1): $ 111rtt Total Bid Price in Words BASE BID ITEM NO.2 — HOBART RO PLANT ROOF REPLACEMENT. For furnishing and delivering to the owner all materials, equipment and supplies necessary to complete the scope of work, and for all costs incurred in completing the work. All costs for materials including equipment and supplies, all other labor including but not limited to, mobilization, direct costs, taxes, insurance, overhead, profit, and all other miscellaneous costs necessary to complete the scope of work shall be included in the Hobart RO Plant Roof Replacement Base Bid Item No. 2, except for those items specifically included in Bid items No. 1 above and No. 3 below. Total Price (Base Bid Item No.2): $ 3 ' -"00 •o0 V, d�00'(5 Total Bid Price in Words L 00300-5 117 (W BASE BID ITEM NO.3 — SOUTH REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ROOF REPLACEMENT. For furnishing and delivering to the owner all materials, equipment and supplies necessary to complete the scope of work and for all costs incurred in completing the work. All costs for materials including equipment and supplies, all other labor including but not limited to, mobilization, direct costs, taxes, insurance, overhead, profit, and all other miscellaneous costs necessary to complete the scope of work shall be included in the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Roof Replacement Base Bid Item No. 3, except for those items specifically included in Bid items No. 1 and No. 2 above. Total Price (Base Bid Item No.3): $ Z3,000- Total Bid Price in Words OVERALL BID — SUM OF BASE BID ITEMS 1, 2, and 3 ABOVE. Lowest bidder to be determined based on the overall bid. Total Price (Overall Bid): $ So `two -it,wSanr,Q �C y� �r,��lrc� dallrLS Total Bid Price in Words (W The undersigned hereby certifies that they have read and understand the contents of this solicitation and agree to furnish at the prices shown any or all of the items above, subject to all instructions, conditions,specifications, drawings, and attachments hereto. Failure to have read all the provisions of this solicitation shall not be cause to alter any resulting contract or request additional compensation. Company Name: Gulf States Industries Inc. Company Address: 7222 Washington St. City, State New Port Richey, FL zip Code 34652 Telephone: (727) 849-8376 Fax: (727) 849-8378 E-mail: gulfstateroof@aol.com Business Tax Receipt Number: N/A FEIN Number: 59-2681321 Authorized Signature: ^^ Date: 5/29/2013 r / ` ! Name: o.N�7 �/ S L ✓r1 6 Title: ESr, .J� (Type/Printed) END OF SECTION (W 00300-6 118 SECTION 00530- EJCDC (tar AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ON THE BASIS OF A STIPULATED PRICE Bid No. 2013040 Roof Replacement Project at the Hobart RO Plant, South County RO Plant, and South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement" or"Contract") dated . 20 by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("OWNER") and. ("CONTRACTOR"). BACKGROUND RECITALS A. Pursuant to applicable provisions of Florida law, OWNER has selected CONTRACTOR to perform certain work as more specifically described in the Contract Documents as defined in Article 8 of this Agreement and the term is as set forth in the Contract Documents. B. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform certain work as more specifically described in the Contract Documents on the terms set forth in the Contract Documents. NOW THEREFORE, OWNER and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, and intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 WORK (W 1.1. CONTRACTOR as an independent contractor and not as an employee shall furnish and complete all of the necessary labor, material, and equipment to perform the work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. CONTRACTOR shall complete all work as specified or indicated in the Contract Documents. The work is generally described as follows, and shall include, but is not necessarily limited to the following: Roof replacement of approximately 3,029 SF at the Hobart Water Treatment Plant, 13,612 SF at the South County RO Plant, and 1,287 SF at the South County Wastewater Treatment Plant. Construction consists of removal of fascia and soffits as necessary, patching and leveling as necessary, concrete repair, installation of new flashing,drips, roofing materials,and gutters as specified in the contract documents. ARTICLE 2 ENGINEER 2.1. The project has been designed by Rodolfo Villamizar, P.E. hereinafter called ENGINEER, and who is to act as OWNER'S representative, assume all duties and responsibilities and have the rights and authority assigned to ENGINEER in the Contract Documents in connection with completion of the work in accordance with the Contract Documents. ARTICLE 3 CONTRACT TIME 3.1. Contract Times. Bidder agrees that the work will be completed in accordance with the following timeframe. (a) Within 7 calendar days from effective date of Notice to Proceed, Contractor shall complete the following tasks: 00530-1 119 1. Obtain all necessary permits. (W 2. Perform all photographic recording and documentation of conditions prior to construction. 3. Mobilize all labor, equipment, and materials. 4. Deliver and store all equipment and materials to the job site(s). 5. Notify all utilities and other affected parties prior to initiating construction. (b) From 8 calendar days to 60 calendar days from the effective date of Notice to Proceed, the CONTRACTOR shall complete the following tasks: 1. Install new roofing materials on all three project sites. If all three project sites are not completed concurrently, roof replacement should be completed first at the South County RO Plant, second at the Hobart RO Plant, and last at the South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. 2. Restore all disturbed areas to their pre-construction condition. 3. Correct all deficiencies noted by Engineer. Completion of all tasks outlined above (i.e., Subparagraphs (a) and (b)) constitutes Substantial Completion. (c) From 61 calendar days to 75 calendar days from the effective date of Notice to Proceed, the CONTRACTOR shall complete the following tasks: 1. Clean up project area. 2. Remove all equipment and material from project site. (W 3. Perform contract closeout procedures. Completion of all tasks outlined above (i.e., Subparagraphs a, b, and c) constitute Final Completion. ARTICLE 4 CONTRACT PRICE 4.1. OWNER shall pay CONTRACTOR for completion of the work in accordance with the Contract Documents in current funds in the amount of$ ARTICLE 5 PAYMENT PROCEDURES 5.1. General. CONTRACTOR shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with Article 14 of the General Conditions. Applications for Payment will be processed by ENGINEER as provided in the General Conditions and the Contract Documents. 5.2. Progress Payments. The OWNER shall make progress payments to the CONTRACTOR on the basis of the approved partial payment request as recommended by ENGINEER in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Florida Statutes section 218.70 et. seq. The OWNER shall retain ten percent (10%) of the payment amounts due to the CONTRACTOR until fifty percent (50%) completion of the work. After fifty percent (50%) completion of the work is attained as certified to OWNER by ENGINEER in writing, OWNER shall retain five percent(5%) of the payment amount due to CONTRACTOR until final completion and acceptance of all work to be performed by CONTRACTOR under the Contract Documents. Pursuant to Florida Statutes section 218.735(8)(b), fifty percent (50%) completion means the point at which the County as OWNER has expended fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of the construction services work purchased under the 00530-2 120 Contract Documents, together with all costs associated with existing change orders and other additions or modifications to the construction services work provided under the Contract Documents. 5.3. Pay Requests. Each request for a progress payment shall be submitted on the application for payment form supplied by OWNER and the application for payment shall contain the CONTRACTOR's certification. All progress payments will be on the basis of progress of the work measured by the schedule of values established, or in the case of unit price work based on the number of units completed. After fifty percent (50%) completion, and pursuant to Florida Statutes section 218.735(8)(d), the CONTRACTOR may submit a pay request to the County as OWNER for up to one half (1/2) of the retainage held by the County as OWNER, and the County as OWNER shall promptly make payment to the CONTRACTOR unless such amounts are the subject of a good faith dispute; the subject of a claim pursuant to Florida Statutes section 255.05(2005); or otherwise the subject of a claim or demand by the County as OWNER or the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR acknowledges that where such retainage is attributable to the labor, services, or materials supplied by one or more subcontractors or suppliers, the Contractor shall timely remit payment of such retainage to those subcontractors and suppliers. Pursuant to Florida Statutes section 218.735(8)(c)(2005), CONTRACTOR further acknowledges and agrees that: 1) the County as OWNER shall receive immediate written notice of all decisions made by CONTRACTOR to withhold retainage on any subcontractor at greater than five percent (5%) after fifty percent (50%) completion; and 2) CONTRACTOR will not seek release from the County as OWNER of the withheld retainage until the final pay request. 5.4. Federal Funds. Paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3 do not apply to construction services wont purchased by the County as OWNER which are paid for, in whole or in part, with federal funds and are subject to federal grantor laws and regulations or requirements that are contrary to any provision of the Local Government Prompt Payment Act. In such event, payment and retainage provisions shall (W be governed by the applicable grant requirements and guidelines. ARTICLE 6 FINAL PAYMENT 6.1. Acceptance And Final Payment: Upon receipt of written notice that the work is ready for final inspection and acceptance, the ENGINEER will promptly make such inspection and when the ENGINEER finds the work acceptable under the terms of the Contract and the Contract fully performed, the ENGINEER will promptly issue a final completion certificate stating that the work provided for in this Contract has been completed, and acceptance by the OWNER under the terms and the conditions thereof is recommended and the entire balance found to be due the CONTRACTOR, will be paid to the CONTRACTOR by the OWNER following County Commission approval of the final Contract payment. 6.2. Acceptance of Final Payment as Release. The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of final payment shall be and shall operate as a release to the OWNER from all claims and all liability to the CONTRACTOR other than claims in stated amounts as may be specifically excepted by the CONTRACTOR for all things done or furnished in connection with the work under this Contract and for every act and neglect of the OWNER and others relating to or arising out of the work. Any payment, however, final or otherwise, shall not release the CONTRACTOR or its sureties from any obligations under the Contract Documents or the Payment and Performance Bonds. ARTICLE 7 CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIONS 7.1. In order to induce OWNER to enter into this Agreement, CONTRACTOR makes the following representations: 00530-3 121 7.1.1. CONTRACTOR has familiarized itself with the nature and extent of the Contract (W Documents, work, site, locality, and all local conditions and laws and regulations that in any manner may affect cost, progress, performance or furnishing of the work. 7.1.2. CONTRACTOR has studied carefully all reports of explorations and drawings of physical conditions which are identified in the Supplementary Conditions as provided in Paragraph 4.02 of the General Conditions, and accepts the determination set forth in Paragraph SC-4.02 of the Supplementary Conditions of the extent of the technical data contained in such reports and drawings upon which CONTRACTOR is entitled to rely. 7.1.3. CONTRACTOR has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for obtaining and carefully studying) all such examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, reports and studies (in addition to or to supplement those referred to in Paragraph 7.2 above) which pertain to the physical conditions at or contiguous to the site or otherwise may affect the cost, progress, performance or furnishing of the work as CONTRACTOR considers necessary for the performance of furnishing of the work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Time and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, including specifically the provisions of Paragraph 4.02 of the General Conditions; and no additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, reports, studies or similar information or data are or will be required by CONTRACTOR for such purposes. 7.1.4. CONTRACTOR has correlated the results of all such observations, examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, reports and studies with the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. (W 7.1.5. CONTRACTOR has given ENGINEER written notice of all conflicts, errors or discrepancies that he has discovered in the Contract Documents and the written resolution thereof by ENGINEER is acceptable to CONTRACTOR. ARTICLE 8 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 8.1. The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between OWNER and CONTRACTOR concerning the work consist of the following: 8.1.1. This Agreement(Section 00530). 8.1.2. Public Construction Bond (Section 00600). 8.1.3. Notice of Award and Notice to Proceed (examples in Section 00800). 8.1.4. General Conditions (Section 00700). 8.1.5. Supplementary Conditions (Section 00800). 8.1.6. Specifications and drawings bearing the title "Roof Replacement Project at the Hobart RO Plant, South County RO Plant, and South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities" as listed in the table of contents hereof. 8.1.7. Exhibits and details inclusive with each sheet bearing the following general title "Roof Replacement Project at the Hobart RO Plant, South County RO Plant, and South Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities", inclusive. 8.1.8. Addenda numbers to 8.1.9. CONTRACTOR'S Bid (Section 00300). 8.1.10. Specifications bearing the title "IRCDUS Water and Wastewater Utility Standards, July 2011", or the latest version thereof. 8.1.11. The following, which may be delivered or issued after the effective date of the Agreement and are not attached hereto: All written amendments and other 00530-4 1rr OO documents amending, modifying, or supplementing the Contract Documents pursuant to Paragraphs 3.04 of the General Conditions. (W 8.2. There are no Contract Documents other than those listed above in this Article 8. The Contract Documents may only be amended, modified or supplemented as provided in Paragraphs 3.04 of the General Conditions. ARTICLE 9 MISCELLANEOUS 9.1. Definitions. Terms used in this Agreement that are defined in Article 1 of the General Conditions will have the meanings indicated in the General Conditions. 9.2. No Assignment. The CONTRACTOR shall not assign, transfer, or otherwise dispose of this Contract or its right, title, or interest in or to the same or any part thereof, or allow legal action to be brought in its name for the benefit of others, without previous consent of the OWNER and concurrence to by the sureties. Any attempted assignment shall be void and may, at the option of the OWNER be deemed an event of default hereunder. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of the OWNER who may be a party_ hereto. OWNER and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto and to its successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. 9.3. Licenses. The CONTRACTOR shall be properly licensed to practice its trade or trades which are involved in the completion of this Agreement and the work thereunder. (W 9.4. Remedies and Choice of Law This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this agreement shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. No remedy herein conferred upon any party is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every such remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by any party or any right, power, or remedy hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof. 9.5. Indemnification. CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the OWNER, together with its agents, engineers, employees, officers, elected officials and representatives, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent caused by a breach of this agreement or the negligence, recklessness or intentional wrongful misconduct of the CONTRACTOR and persons employed or utilized by the CONTRACTOR in the performance of the work under this Agreement. This indemnification and hold harmless provision shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 9.6. Availability of Funds. The obligations of the Owner under this Contract are subject to the availability of funds lawfully appropriated for its purpose by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County. 9.7. Pledge of Credit. The CONTRACTOR shall not pledge the OWNER'S credit or (W make it a guarantor of payment or surety for any Agreement, debt, obligation, judgment, lien or any 00530-5 123 form of indebtedness. The CONTRACTOR further warrants and represents that it has no obligation of indebtedness that would impair its ability to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. (W 9.8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, but all such counterparts, when duly executed, shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 9.9. Public Records. The OWNER and the CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (Public Records Law) in connection 'with this Agreement. 9.10. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable for the remainder of this Agreement, then the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. 9.11. Captions and Interpretations. Captions in this Agreement are included for convenience only and are not to be considered in any construction or interpretation of this Agreement or any of its provisions. Unless the context indicates otherwise, words importing the singular number include the plural number, and vice versa. Words of any gender include the correlative words of the other genders, unless the sense indicates otherwise. 9.12. Entirety of Agreement. This Agreement incorporates and includes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, and understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there are no commitments, (W agreements, or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms and conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the formality and of equal dignity herewith. 9.13. Background Recitals. The background recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this Contract. (W 00530-6 124 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OWNER AND CONTRACTOR have signed this Agreement the day and year first written above. This Agreement will be effective on , OWNER CONTRACTOR Indian River County Board of County Commissioners By: By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman (CORPORATE SEAL) Attest: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved By: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: County Attorney Address for giving notices 1801 27"' Street Address for giving notices Vero Beach, Florida 32960 License No. Agent for service of process: END OF SECTION 00530-7 125 Office Of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: �*—William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorne THROUGH: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Atto DATE: May 28, 2013 SUBJECT: Enclave Subdivision Pending Utility Lien In 2006, San Messina 23 Reality, LLC (San Messina) began development of the Enclave Subdivision located on 65th Street between 66th and 58th Avenues. The subdivision received final plat approval in January, 2007. Pursuant to code existing at the time of plat approval San Messina posted two letters of credit for the subdivision. One Letter of Credit in the amount of $136,958.12 was posted to secure completion of required improvements for the subdivision. The other Letter of Credit in the amount of $17,473.88 was posted to secure installation of required sidewalks. In December 2007, the developer defaulted on the contract with the County to construct the required subdivision improvements and the letter of credit with Colonial Bank was called. The County then solicited public bids for completion of the work. The cost of the engineering and construction necessary to complete the subdivision was $103,842.74 leaving a balance of $33,115.38, after expenses, from the called Letter of Credit. After completion of the required improvements for the subdivision in October 2010, the County issued a Certificate of Completion for the Enclave Subdivision. In October 2008, the Developer defaulted on the contract to install the required sidewalks and the County called the Letter of Credit from Colonial Bank in the amount of $17,473.88. The sidewalks have not been installed as all of the homes in the subdivision are unfinished and staff saw no purpose of installing sidewalks in an empty subdivision. The County currently holds $17,433.08, after expenses, from the called sidewalk letter of credit, and when combined with the balance left from the called letter of credit from the required improvements, the total held by the County is $50,548.46. In October 2007, Colonial Bank filed a foreclosure action against San Messina, the m z developers of the Enclave Subdivision. San Messina counter sued claiming Colonial Bank had failed to abide by the terms of the loan agreement. The case was resolved in May 2011 pursuant to an agreed final judgment reached by the parties. The final judgment and settlement agreement resolved all outstanding matters between San Messina and Colonial Bank. The County was not named as a party to the foreclosure law suit. Now that all of the litigation has concluded, the subdivision must be brought into compliance with the current code concerning sidewalk improvements. The sidewalks have been installed in the common areas, however, recent code changes now allow a developer to record deed restrictions requiring the installation of sidewalks to be completed by each homeowner prior to issuance of a certificate of occupation. The required restrictive covenant has been drafted by Ralph Evans, Esq., of Stewart, Evans, Stewart & Emmons, PA of Vero Beach. The restrictions have been reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office and are ready to be recorded with the recording fees to be borne by the property owner. There remains one outstanding issue requiring Board attention. During the pendency of the foreclosure action, San Messina failed to pay the base facility charges for sewer and water utilities. As of June 1, 2013, there exists utility lien totaling $56,469.46, inclusive of penalties on the property. A breakdown of the liens is attached. San Messina has offered to apply the proceeds from the called letters of credit in order to satisfy the existing utility liens. These utility liens are, however, eligible for a waiver though the recently adopted amnesty ordinance (No 2013-002) which would decrease the lien amount as of June 1, 2013 to $29,912.56, inclusive of the recording fees for the lien releases. Additionally, Mr. Evans has requested and the County Attorney's Office concurs that of the amount currently held by the County, that his office would receive the sum of $10,000 as attorney's fees for drafting the documents necessary for the restrictive covenants and satisfaction of the utility liens. Funding: There are no expenditures of County funds associated with this matter. Recommendation: After the amendment to the declaration of restrictive covenants has been recorded and a recorded copy provided to the County Attorney, along with the required Form(s) W-9, staff recommends the proceeds from the called Letters of Credit from the Enclave Subdivision be applied as follows: The necessary amounts to bring the Enclave Subdivision utility lien current, due to the failure to pay for base facility charges (with penalties waived based on the recently adopted amnesty ordinance). • $10,000 remitted to Ralph Evans, Esq. for payment of attorney's fees incurred in this matter. • $160 to pay for the recording fees for the releases of liens The remaining residual amount from the called letters of credit including accrued interest remitted to the trust account of Stewart & Evans. c: Ralph Evans, Esq. 2 la r r r 1�VE� �a Indian River County z Department of Utility Service 9801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Tel: 772-567-8000 Fax: 772-978-1858 Lpg19 Search by Name Amount to bring Customer# Account# Name Address A/R Balance Penalties eligible current as of 6/1/13 As of 6/1/13 for waiver with penalty waiver 1008283 081064 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6594 59TH CT $3,529.27 $1,669.76 $1,859.51 1008283 081066 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6665 59TH CT $3,529.27 $1,669.76 $1,859.51 1008283 081068 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6650 59TH CT $3,529.27 $1,669.76 $1,859.51 1008283 081070 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6664 59TH CT $3,529.27 $1,669.76 $1,859.51 1008283 081072 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6693 59TH CT $3,529.27 $1,669.76 $1,859.51 1008283 081074 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6636 59TH CT $3,529.27 $1,669.76 $1,859.51 1008283 081076 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6566 59TH CT $3,529.27 $1,669.76 $1,859.51 1008283 081078 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6608 59TH CT $3,529.27 $1,669.76 $1,859.51 1008283 081080 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6552 59TH CT $3,529.50 $1,669.99 $1,859.51 1008283 081082 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6679 59TH CT $3,529.50 $1,669.99 $1,859.51 1008283 081112 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6651 59TH CT $3,529.29 $1,669.76 $1,859.53 1008283 081188 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6692 59TH CT $3,529.35 $1,669.80 $1,859.55 1008283 081190 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6510 59TH CT $3,529.35 $1,669.80 $1,859.55 1008283 081192 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6524 59TH CT $3,529.35 $1,669.80 $1,859.55 1008283 081320 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6595 59TH CT $3,529.48 $1,669.84 $1,859.64 1008283 081322 ENCLAVE VERO LLC 6538 59TH CT $3,529.48 $1,669.84 $1,859.64 $56,469.46 $26,716.90 $29,752.56 recording fees for lien release $160.00 $160.00 NOT A FINAL BILL $56,629.46 $29,912.56 Bethany Messersmith Accountant Indian River County Utilities 772-226-1837 bmessersmith@ircgov.com 1 Prepared 5/20/2013 to A - LDR AMENDMENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ILEGISLATIVE1 MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird; County Administrator D T ENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: odZ Robert M. Keating, ACP; ommuni evelopment Director /:)�5 FROM: Stan Boling, AICP Planning Director DATE: May 15, 2013 SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendments to Land Development Regulations(LDRs)Chapters 901,911, and 912 to Change the Limitations for Size of Commercial Vehicles and Recreational Vehicles Parked Outside in Residential Areas It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 18, 2013. BACKGROUND In Indian River County,certain types of commercial vehicles are prohibited from being parked in residential areas. Those prohibited commercial vehicles include bucket trucks,dump trucks,semi-tractors,semi-trailers, and other similar vehicles, as well as vehicles over a certain size and weight. In essence, current county regulations allow commercial trucks and vans, subject to weight, length, and height limitations, while prohibiting larger, more industrial type of vehicles. At the February 5,2013 Board of County Commissioners meeting,Ron Heen appeared and requested that the county change its land development regulations(LDRs)to allow commercial vehicles taller than 9 feet to be parked outside in residential areas. Mr.Heen is a tile and flooring contractor who parks his commercial truck at his single-family residence at 1046 22nd Avenue in the Heritage Estates subdivision. During discussion at the February 5`h meeting, the Board heard from staff that Mr. Heen is currently under code enforcement for multiple violations. One of those violations involves parking a 9'h foot tall commercial vehicle outside in a residential area contrary to county LDRs that prohibit commercial vehicles over 9 feet tall from being parked outside in residential areas. Staff also showed the Board pictures of Mr.Heen's truck and illustrations presented to the Board in 2008 when the county last changed its commercial vehicle regulations. At the conclusion of the February 5`h discussion, the Board indicated a willingness to accommodate Mr. Heen's request and directed staff to evaluate regulations for commercial vehicles parked in residential areas. In response to the Board's direction, staff surveyed commercial vehicle regulations of other local governments and compared those with Indian River County's regulations. Also, staff included recreational vehicles in its research, since the Board recently expressed an interest in re-examining the county's current prohibition on parking recreational vehicles that exceed 32 feet in length in residential areas. Staff then FACommunity Deve1opment\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\CommandRVatresidenceBCC.doc 126 reported back to the Board at its March 19,2013 meeting. At that meeting,the Board directed staff to initiate a formal LDR amendment to change the existing limitation on the height of commercial vehicles in residential areas and to update the current length limit for recreational vehicles (RVs) parked in residential areas (see attachment #6). In accordance with the Board's direction, staff prepared a draft ordinance to amend the county's existing commercial vehicle and recreational vehicle regulations and initiated the formal amendment process. PZC Hearing At a public hearing on May 9,2013,the PZC considered the draft ordinance,heard from concerned residents and Mr. Heen, and voted 3-1 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed ordinance(see attachment#7). Even though the motion received a 3-1 majority vote,it did not pass. That is because the county code requires four affirmative votes for a motion to pass in any commission or committee with more than five members. In this case,no formal motion was passed,but the PZC's vote constitutes its advisory"recommendation" to the Board. While the PZC motion to recommend that the BCC adopt the proposed ordinance failed,that action does not accurately reflect the PZC's position on the matter. Essentially,all four members supported the proposed RV change,and three of the four supported the commercial vehicle height modification. Because one member did not support the commercial vehicle modification, that member voted against the motion. ANALYSIS • Commercial Vehicles Most local governments, including Indian River County, regulate the parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. Such regulations generally restrict location, visibility, size, and types of commercial vehicles. Those commonalities were evident in the results of a survey conducted by staff in 2008 and staff's recent surveys conducted in January and May 2013. Of the local governments surveyed in 2013, all regulate commercial vehicles in residential areas. Most of those local governments,including Indian River County,have regulations that limit the weight of commercial vehicles parked outside in residential areas. Those regulations use various measures of weight, including rated capacity(cargo carrying capacity), gross weight(total weight of vehicle loaded to capacity), or some other weight category. Several local governments,including Indian River County,also regulate commercial vehicle dimensions (length, width, or height). In the 2013 surveys, maximum commercial vehicle lengths were as follows: Chesapeake,Virginia 20 feet Fairfax County, Virginia 21 feet Sebastian, Florida 23 feet Indian River County 23 feet "Average" length: 23.86 feet Brevard County, Florida 24 feet Palm Beach County, Florida 26 feet Durham,North Carolina 30 feet (W Based on that sampling, Indian River County's 23 foot maximum length is close to the 23.86 foot average. FACommunity Development\CurDevW0.2013 BCC\CommandRVatresidenceBCC.doc 127 According to the survey, each local government that limited commercial vehicle length also limited vehicle height. From the 2013 surveys, maximum commercial vehicle heights were as follows: Chesapeake, Virginia 7 feet Fairfax County, Virginia 8 feet Manatee County, Florida 9 feet Indian River County 9 feet "Average"height: 9 feet Sebastian, Florida 9 feet Palm Beach County, Florida 9 feet Durham,North Carolina 12 feet Overall, the 9 foot average height resulting from the 2013 surveys mirrored the results of the 2008 survey. That 2008 survey found that 3 out of 18 local governments (Sebastian, Manatee County, and Palm Beach County) limited commercial vehicle height, and all 3 of those jurisdictions had a 9 foot height limit. The purpose of the county's length and height limits is to accommodate small-scale and close-to-medium- scale commercial trucks and vans used by workers and small business owners, while prohibiting larger commercial vehicles,in residential areas. The premise of having the current dimensional limits is that smaller and close-to-medium scale commercial trucks and vans can fit into residential neighborhoods,while larger commercial trucks and vans will stand-out and establish an aesthetic nuisance. In staff's opinion, it is appropriate for the county's regulations to include dimensional limits, as well as the county's outright prohibition on parking certain types of commercial vehicles, regardless of size, in residential areas. In this case, increasing the county's commercial vehicle height limit from 9 feet to 9 '/i feet would accommodate Mr. Heen's current commercial vehicle. Since a 9 '/z foot limit is near the survey average(9 feet)and within the range of height limits imposed by the local governments surveyed(7 feet— 12 feet),a 9 %2 foot standard would not be unreasonable. It is staff's position that increasing the height limit from 9 feet to 9.5 feet would be un-noticeable to most observers and would not create an obvious nuisance. Of course,the same could be said of a minor change to other quantitative thresholds, such as setback requirements or building height limitations, contained in the LDRs. It is also staff's position that there is a broad spectrum of commercial truck and van sizes and that there will always be many types of commonly available commercial vehicles that will "just breach" any dimensional threshold established by the county. • Recreational Vehicles At its meeting of October 23, 2012, the Board directed staff to revisit the county's existing 32 foot length limit for recreational vehicles (RVs) parked in residential areas. At that same meeting, the Board also directed staff to initiate an amendment to the CL and CG districts regarding outdoor vehicle storage lots. In response to both directives,staff prepared one ordinance that proposed changes to the CL and CG districts as well as the current RV length limit. At its December 13, 2012 meeting,the PZC considered that ordinance and unanimously recommended that the Board adopt the proposed changes. At its special call meeting of February 5, 2013, however, the Board rejected the proposed ordinance. The primary reason for the Board's rejection of the February 2013 ordinance related to proposed changes that would have allowed stand alone outdoor vehicle storage lots in the CL and CG districts.Thus,the Board did not separately consider changes to the existing limit on RV length. In conjunction with considering an amendment to the current height limit for commercial vehicles parked in residential areas,the Board may now re-consider the RV-related proposed amendment. ^ ^ FACommunity Deve1opment\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\CommandRVatresidenceBCC.doc 12 8 Recently, staff surveyed 10 local governments, including Indian River County, regarding regulations for parking RVs in residential areas. Six of the ten jurisdictions surveyed(60%)had no length limitation,while two jurisdictions(20%)had no length limitation for an RV parked in a specified yard.Only two jurisdictions (20%) had outright limits on RV length(Fellsmere and Indian River County). Staff's position is that the county's current 32 foot RV length limit is out of date and does not accommodate many popular RVs that have lengths between 32 feet and 38 feet. Consequently, staff supports changing county requirements to eliminate the current length limit and replace it with the 400 square foot overall RV size limit(vehicle length multiplied by vehicle width)contained in the LDRs and in the State's definition of RVs. That change mirrors the RV-related change proposed in the February 2013 ordinance(see attachment #2). • Proposed Ordinance If adopted, the proposed ordinance (see attachment #8) will increase the maximum allowable height of a commercial vehicle parked in a residential area from 9.0 feet to 9.5 feet. No changes to existing maximums for commercial vehicle length or weight are proposed. In addition,the proposed ordinance will eliminate the existing 32 foot maximum length for RVs parked outside in residential areas. In place of an RV length requirement, the ordinance will establish a maximum overall size for RVs, limiting the RV area (vehicle length multiplied by vehicle width) to 400 square feet. That 400 square foot size limitation matches limitations for RVs in current state law and the county's definition'of an RV. • Economic and Affordable Housing Development Impacts The proposed amendments are minor in nature,will not change requirements for new development,and will not change the cost of development. Therefore,the proposed ordinance is neutral with respect to economic and affordable housing development impacts. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed ordinance. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Report and BCC Minutes from 2008 Changes to Commercial Vehicle Regulations 2. February 2013 proposed Amendment to Recreational Vehicle Size Regulations 3. Existing County Regulations for Commercial Vehicles 4. 2013 Summary of Local Government Regulations for Commercial Vehicles (CHART) 5. 2013 Summary of Local Government Regulations for Recreational Vehicles (CHART) 6. Minutes from March 19, 2013 BCC Meeting 7. Draft Minutes from May 9, 2013 PZC Meeting 8. Proposed Ordinance Amending the LDRs Approved Date Indian River Co, APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Admin. �3 �3 FOR: 0`j Legal -?- 3 Budget 10 BY: A• Dept. Risk Mgr. FACommunity Deve1opment\CurDev\BCC\2013 BCC\CommandRVatresidenceBCC.doc 129 ATTAMIMENT(W 1 PUBLIC p ARING INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA LEGISLATIVE 1V tMORANDUM TO: Joseph A Baird;County Administrator D TMENT BEAD CONCURRENCE: Robert M.Keating,AICP;C mmuni lopment Director FROM.- Stan Bolin Planning Director DATE: December 8,2008 SUBJECT.- COUsidet•afion of Atiaendments to Restrictions on Parking Commercial Vehicles in Residential Areas;LDR Chapters 901,911,and 912 It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County (W Commissioners at its regular meeting of December 16,2008. BACKGROUND Most local governments,including Indian River County,restrict the size and/or type of commercial vehicles that can be parked in residential areas. Such restrictions generally apply to commercial vehicles parked at residences. In Indian River County,these restrictions have not been evaluated or updated in 12 years. On September 23,2008,the Board of County Commissioners(BCC)considered the county's current. restrictions on commercial vehicles parked in residential areas(see attachment#1). At that time,the Board determined that the existing restrictions may be out of date for newer,heavy capacity pick up trucks. The BCC then directed staff to evaluate the county's existing restrictions and adopt changes that will accommodate newer truck models. Based on the BCC's direction,staff has conducted research and drafted amendments to the existing Chapter 901 definition of"commercial vehicle"as*ell as to Chapter 911 and Chapter 912 restrictions on parking commercial vehicles. PSAC Action: i At its meeting of October 23,2008,the Professional Services Advisory Committee(PSAC)voted 8-Oto recommend that the Board ofCounty Commissioners(BCC)adopt theproposed amendments with one t minor addition. That addition has been incorporated into the proposed draft ordinance. The PZC is now to consider the proposed amendments and is to make a recommendation to the BCC to adopt, adopt with changes,or reject the proposed amendments. Ficommunity DevelopmenAuse skcurDrABcwoos Bccconsidcmuon oT91 i comm hieles 1 - ATTjP.IiIR�#'1 1301 PZC Action: At its meeting of November 13, 2008, the Planning & Zoning Commission (PZC) voted 4-1 to recommend that the BCC adopt the proposed amendments to eliminate restrictions on vehicles with racks and to clarify restrictions on vehicles with booms. In response to the PZC's recommendations . staff has modified the proposed ordinance to clearly allow for standard-size pick-up tricks and vans with racks and to allow vehicles with fold-up booms that are not"visible"when the vehicle is parked. The BCC is now to consider the proposed ordinance and is to adopt,adopt with changes,or reject the proposed ordinance. ANALYSIS The intent of the county's regulations is to promote aesthetics and limit nuisances within residential areas by restricting commercial vehicles to sizes and types customarily used for personal transportation and commonly found in residential areas. The county last updated its commercial vehicle regulations in 1996. That change increased the threshold for commercial vehicles allowed in residential areas from 3f4 ton rated capacity(carrying capacity)to 1 ton rated capacity,and was based on a determination that personal vehicle sizes had increased. Therefore,under current regulations,one commercial vehicle with a rated capacity of i ton or less is allowed per residence. Recently, staff researched specifications for numerous new truck and van models as well as the commercial vehicle regulations of 18 local governments. That research indicates that some popular models of newer pick-up trucks exceed the county's current 1 ton rated capacity threshold. That research also indicates,however,that trucks with increased rated capacity are no different in size and . (W appearance from models that have a different carrying capacity options"package". Thus,the county's current regulations rely on a threshold that does not directly relate to observable differences in vehicle size or shape. Throughout the state, many local governments use size and weight thresholds, rather than rated capacity,as a component of their conn ercial vehicle regulations. Such size and'weight criteria appear to be more directly related to commercial vehicle impacts rather than carrying capacity. As a result of these findings,staff's draft amendment changes the commercial vehicle threshold from"rated capacity" - to a threshold based on vehicle length,height,and gross vehicle weight, The proposed threshold will not classifya full loaded lar late model ick- truck with a gross vehicle weight of 15 000 pounds Y 8� pick-up 8z 8h or less as a commercial vehicle. The Public Works Director has verified that such vehicles should not adversely impact local roads and driveways in residential areas. Based upon the sizes and weights of larger new truck models(see attachment#3),staffhas drafted IDR changes that will allow the largest pick-up truck models,as well as common cargo vans,to be parked in residential areas without respect to carrying capacity. The proposed ordinance also specifically allows such pick up trucks and vans to have a rack. In addition,the draft changes codify existing county policy that prohibits bucket trucks,dump trucks,seri-tractors,and similar commercial vehicles from being kept in residential areas. _ Theproposed changes will modify the Chapter 901 definition of"Commercial vehicle"by adding size and weight criteria and by specifically defining certain types of vehicles as commercial vehicles(dump trucks, bucket trucks, semi-tractors). In addition, the proposed changes will amend two identical j sections of the LDRs, sections 911.15(3) and 912.17. These changes will update regulations in accordance with the definition changes,continue to prohibit commercial vehicles such as dump trucks and large sized vehicles in residential areas,and continue to allow vans and pick-up trucks with racks in residential areas. F.iCommunity DevelopmentVJsm\Cur0e%ABCO22008 BCC Con Poles. Z 131 _... ._._.... . .............. . ............................ (W RECUM ffNDATI0N: Staff recommends that the Broad of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment. ATTACHMENTS: I. Back-up Memo and Draft Minutes from the September 23,2008 BCC Meeting 2. Draft Minutes from the October 23,2008 PSAC Meeting 3. Draft Minutes from the November 13,2008 PZC Meeting 4. 2008 Survey of Vehicle Weight and Size 5, 2008 Survey of Local Governments on Thresholds for Commercial Vehicles Parked in Residential Areas 6. Proposed Amendments to Commercial Vehicle Chapter 901 Definition and Chapters 911 and 912 Restrictions Indian River Co, -Agmved Date APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Admin. WJ G FOR: j _ A he Legal C Budget I k3 03 BY: Det 1 Risk Mgr. (W 3 FiCommunity Development%UsersWurDevlBc moo8 BCMConsideretion of 4 S 1 Comm vehiciewtr 132 _.._..............._ .. ...... . . ...... .. SEPTEMBER 23, 2008 ITEM 14A I INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissloners DATE: September 17,2007 SUBJECT: Amendment to Ordinance Section 912.17 Parking and Storage of Vehicles FROM: Commissioner Wesley S.Davis Distriot 1 Currently, Ordinance Section 912.17 Code of Indian river County, Florida, restricts commercial vehicles parking of commercial vehicles In residential areas not to exceed 1 (one)ton rated capacity. (W Due to modifications to the suspension of.newer truck rnodels(see attached brochures), I request the Board of County Commissioners give the legal staff direction to draft an amendment to Ordinance Section 912.17 in support of increasing vehicle weight capacity In a residential area not exceeding a rated capacity of one and a quarter ton (1.25)or less. As this is an amendment to County land use regulatlons, the amendment must be considered by the Professional Services Advisory Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission. WSD1mlh I 't (W i i S j f i 1 F:tt3CClAgenda#tems12t308U]avts-Amendment to Ordinance 912.17.doc > . T - 33 _.... .... .. . . . . ..................... _..... :. ;,; ,. yy ;��, � . ��, ® ^• Drive one. (W Home-•>Trucks->F-250 SL >Super Duty XL -250 SD t ?wi 314 ton ..w.•..w rr....w.__.w.w..,•;,y.`• ••fit-��t � �,rr.M..r--.•..w.w.w..a...r r....r.-. (• .• :fir• .•C�. •yr,� .N y��7,��fQ ..y.�.Q..—. . • M `j •• • MfQ�IM�f'.F•i Ho�i't •>Trucks.>M50 F-150 i 1 ton •rr• . .•www•.•sNw1•+YnMsw�r..AV.A••Ar.pa•.r•�'t•' ••T�I r„r�••,•,r�w••.rr.w•.• •.w w•r.w•. Yw. . � Drive one. Home->Truc .> ks f'•4S C • E 200$ F-450 i i 1.25 ton 3 ' Motor t. 1 • , t E • i i � s : 134 : �EXMPT FROM A�@• UNIAPPROVED MINUTES OF DRAFT sco MEETING OF BY ► t Deputy clerk ,(� DATE:�S� t I'7. a-00$ , THIS IS AN EXCERPT OF TIE UNAPPROVED MMTES OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,HELD SEPTEMBER 23, 2008 14. COARMSIONER MMS 14.A. Co sroszomm Sxok4 L.Bo ggM,.CHADMAN-NONE 14A C0M&W' S10NER T'Y=HYS DAEM VICH CH.4lRMA]V 14.]3.1. A ADA ATTo ORDMNCEIHCTroN912.17PARMGAM (W SMk4GE OF VEHICLES Vice Chairman Davis conveyed that a gentleman,who works for a local cable company,approached him about an Ordinance that limits the capacity weight of vehicles in residential developments to one ton. He said the issue is that a person can not tell the difference between a%ton, l ton,or 1 V4 ton vehicle by looking at them. Community Development Director Bob Keating pointed out that pick up trucks are getting bigger and he clarified that it is not staff s intent to treat them as commercial vehicles in i neighborhoods. He proposed that staff amend the Land Development Regulation(LDR)to make a change recognizing the fact that vehicles are receiving more hauling capacity,and should not be j treated as commercial vehicles. He said if the Board authorizes staff to move forward with the amendment that he would come back to the Board with the LDR Amendment, t 33 September 23,2008 (W i - ATTACHNEU 1. 35 "EXCERPT FROM /tPPi30ti UNAPPROVE MINUTES Of DRAFT RM MEe"NG OF'(W 1�,.I,?. By_ DeputY Clerk DATE' L7, ON MOTION by Commissioner O'Bryan,SECONDED by Commissioner Flescher,the Board by a 3-0 vote(Chairman Bowden and Commissioner Wheeler absent) directed the- County heCounty Attomey's office to draft an Amendment to Ordinance Section 912.17, Parking and Storage of Vehicles,to include 1'/<ton pick up trucks. (W i 't I I , 's 34 September 23,2008 i - ATTAMMIEW 136 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE There was a meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) Professional Services Advisory Committee (PSAC) on Thursday, October 23, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. in the First Floor Conference Room "131-501" of the County Administration Building "B", 1800 270' Street, Vero Beach, Florida. Present were Peter Robinson, Development Appointee; Todd Smith, Engineer Appointee; Stephen Moler, Engineer Appointee; Linda Schlitt Gonzales (arrived at 2:20 p.m.), Real Estate Broker Appointee; George Kulczyckl, Forester, Biologist, Botanist, Horticulturallst, or Arborist Appointee; Warren Dill, Law Appointee; John Blum, Civil Engineer Appointee; Alan Schommer (arrived at 2:10 p.m.), General 'Contractor Appointee; Robert Gaskill, Architect Appointee (arrived at 2:03 p.m.); and Jon Day, Environmental Issues Appointee. Absent were Robert Poore, Alternate (excused), Robert Brackett, Finance and Business Appointee; Frank Johnson and Mark Scott, Altemates (unexcused). Also present were IRC staff: Stan Boling, Planning Director; Bob (W Keating, Community Development Director; Vlfill Collins, County Attorney; Jim Davis, Public Works Director; and Misty L. Horton, Commissioner Assistant, District 1. Others present: Jorge A. Latour and Victor Knight, Interested Parties. Please note: You may hear an audio of the meeting; review the agenda and the minutes on the IRC website - www.ircgov.com/Boards/PSAC/2008. Please note listed at the end of each agenda item refers to time location of these items on the audio recorded of the meeting. Call To Order Chainrian Smith called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. Approval of Minutes of the May 15, 2008 Meeting ' ON MOTION BY Mr. Robinson, SECONDED BY Mr. Moler, the members voted unanimously (7-0) to approve the May 15, 2008 minutes, as presented. (2:01 p.m.) l PSAC/Unapproved 1 October 23,2408 CADocuments and SettlngslmbowdrenlLocal SettingsUemporary Internet Files10LK2nMin10 23 08.doc AMOUNT 1 137 _.. ............. .......... ... ........ _... (W Old Business None New Business A. Consideration of Amendments to Restrictions on Parking Commercial Vehicles In Residential Areas, LDR Chapters 911 and 912 Mr. Stan Boling, Planning Director welcomed new member Jon Day, Environmental Issues Appointee to the Committee, replacing Ryan Morreil and provided direction to the committee where IRC committee & Board of County Commisslon information and committee documents may be found on the County Website. Mr. Robert Gaskill arrived at 2:03 p.m. Mr. Boling mentioned a correction on his memorandum dated October 16, 2008, page 2, under Recommendations, after the words "related to", replace school concurrency with commercial vehicle regulations. He continued with a (W PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file with the Commission Office. Mr. Boling summarized the proposed revision to the commercial vehicle definition to replace the wordage of rated capacity to gross vehicle weight, with the additional description to include size (length and height) of the vehicle and restriction regarding buckets, booms, etc. A discussion ensued regarding technical elements of other trucks with hoisting booms versus-the physical/visual appearance. ON MOTION BY Mr. Robinson, SECONDED BY Mr. Moler, the members voted unanimously (8-0) to adopt the proposed LDR amendments related to commercial vehicles .subject to adding language regarding the specifics of hoisting equipment. (2:10 p.m.) Mr. Alan Schommer arrived at 2:10 p.m. PSAC1Unappraved 2 October 23,2008 'GAI)ocurnents and SettingA nbowdren\Local SetUngsWemporary Internet FUes\OLK271MIn10 9R na doe ATTAC KENT 1 138 .8 B. Consideration of Amendments to Mining Regulations in LDR Chapters 934 and 971 Mr. Boling provided background information regarding the status of the moratorium on applications for new mines in Indian River County, explaining a state law mandates the moratorium can go no further than January 7, 2009. He referred to his memorandum dated October 8, 2008, with 11 attachments and PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file with the Commission Office. Mr. Boling referred to the 38 suggested recommendations for change made by the Planning & Zoning Commission. He highlighted County staff does not have expertise in some of the groundwater issues and water quality issues; relying upon St. Johns River Water Management District and other agencies. Mrs. Linda Gonzalez arrived at 2:20 p:m. Lengthy discussions ensued regarding haul route traffic, requirements, noise standards, compliance and enforcement. Mr. Victor Knight gave his opinion regarding the special exception use permitting and discussion followed. ON MOTION BY Mr. Schommer, SECONDED BY Mrs. Gonzalez, the members voted unanimously (10-0)to recommend the Board of County Commissioners consider the following changesfadditions: • Complete elimination of the 50 haul trips out per hour truck limit. • increase Formal Unresolved Violations from 2 to 5 within a one (1) year period before scheduling a penalty determination hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. • No waiver of the appeal fee. • Applicant given option for developers agreement to equitably share haul route paving costs. • Public input required at Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. ; PSAC/lJnapproved 3 October 23,2008 i CA)ocurnents and SeifingsWbowdrentLocai SettingsWernporary Internet Ftles%OLK2-AMIn10 23 08.doc ; ATTACHMENT 1 139 ON MOTION BY Mr. Moler, SECONDED BY Mr. Robinson, the members voted unanimously (10-0) to recommend the Board of County Commissioners consider not penalizing (violating) the mine owner/operator for traffic violations of drivers not employed by the owner/operator. ON MOTION BY Mr. Robinson, SECONDED BY Mr. Schommer, the members voted unanimously (10-0) to recommend the Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed mining regulation LDR amendments revising the average annual daily trips (AADT) standard for the haul route paving threshold as follows: A1 =500 AADT A2=1500 AADT A3 = no limitation (no paving required) ON MOTION BY Mrs. Gonzales, SECONDED BY Mr. Blum, the members voted unanimously (10-0) to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the ordinance with this Committee's recommendations contained in the motions above. Matters by McMbers None Matters by Staff Mr. Boling inquired about the 2:00 p.m. versus 12:15 p.m. meeting time and the consensus was for the meeting time to remain at 12:15 p.m. Adiournment i f There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:06 p.m. . i t i ,,. PSACNnapproved 4 October 23 2008 CADocurnents and SettingsimbowdrenlLocal SettingsVemporary Intemet FHes\OLK27\M1n10 23 08,doc AVACHMEW 14�0 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION There was a meeting of the Indian River County (IRC) Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) on Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 7:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers of the County Administration Building, 1801 271' Street, Vero Beach, Florida. You may hear an audio of the meeting; review the meeting agenda, backup material and the minutes on Indian River County website www.1rcaov.com/Boards/PZC/2008. Present were members: Vice Chairman Craig Fletcher, District 3 Appointee; Donna Keys, District 1 Appointee; Gerard Weick, District 2 Appointee; Greg Smith, District 4 Appointee; and Dr. Richard Baker, Member-at-Large. Absent were Chairman George Hamner, Member-at-Large; George Lawrence, District 5 Appointee and Carol Johnson, non-voting School Board Liaison (ail excused); Also present was IRC staff: William G. Collins II, County Attorney; Bob Keating, Community Development Director; Stan Boling, Planning (W Director; John McCoy and Steven Deardeuff, Senior Planners; and Reta Smith, Recording Secretary. Call to Order andPl�of Allegiance (7:14:32) Vice Chairman Fletcher called the meeting to order and led all in the Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minim(7:15:05) ON MOTION BY Ms. Keys, SECONDED BY Mr. Smith, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve the minutes of the EAR Public Workshop of September 30, 2008, as presented. ON MOTION BY Ms. Keys, SECONDED BY Mr. { Weick, the members voted unanimously (5-0) to approve the minutes of the meeting of October 23, 2008, as presented. { PZC/Unapproved 1 November 13, 2008 F:/BCC/All Commlttees/PZC/2008Ag&Min/PZC Minutes 11/13/08.doc 141 .............. (W Mr. Ilton related his family owned seven acres on south side of the subject perty and asked if the rezoning wool ect his property or his taxes. Mr. ling responded Mr. Hamilto ' zoning would stay the same, Vice Chairman Fletcher os a public hearing at 7:54 p.m. 8:09:28 ON MO N BY Ms. Keys, CONDED BY Mr. Wei , the members voted una ously (5-0) t approve staff's recommendation. Vice Chairman Fletcher read the following into the record: B. Consideration of Amendments to Restrictions on Parking Commercial Vehicles in Residential Areas; LDR Chapters 901, 911, and 912[Legislative] Mr. Boling reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated October 24, 2008, a copy of which is on file in the Commission Office (8:10:26). (W Ms. Keys suggested adding box trucks to the exclusion list. Mr. Boling observed most box trucks were nine feet or taller, and he felt the height dimension would probably be a good way to regulate this issue. Mr. Smith noted many electricians or plumbers had what he would call box trucks, and wondered If those would be restricted. Both he and Vice Chairman Fletcher stressed they did not want to impact the small businessman who parked his truck at his home. Discussion followed. 8:37:55 ON MOTION BY Mr. Weick, SECONDED BY Ms. Keys, the members voted (2.3) to approve staffs recommendation. Vice Chairman Fletcher, Mr, Smith and- Dr. Baker opposed. ' ' The motion failed. (W PZC/Unapproved 5 November 13, 2008 FJBCC/All Committees/PZC/2008Ag&M1n/PZC Minutes 11/13/08.doo ATTACHMENT 142 _. _... . 8:39:43 ON MOTION BY Ms. Keys, SECONDED BY Mr. Smith, the members voted (4-1) to approve staff's recommendation with the elimination of the rack restriction and have staff come up with some wording on booms. Mr. Weick opposed. Commissi vers Matters (8:40:16) Ms. Key recalled during recent meetings involving a Evaluation and Appraisal R ort (EAR) there was discussion regi ng changes on sewer hook-up r uirements for the Barrier Islan and asked for claffwflon onthis i 113— Mr, ,- AlarKeating explained-the R was only a guide to what would be cion. ext year when the Comp hensive Plan (Comp Plan) was amended, and t this time the was o specific wording. He stated basically the EAR sal the policy should a amended so hook up to sewer would be required wh available; h ever this would be much more specific when the Comp Pla amend nts were discussed. Discussion followed about S ohns River Water Management recommendations regarding monitori wells in connection with mining regulations. Plannina Matters (8:46:31) Mr. Boling reminded members there w uld be a special hearing on mining regulations on. ednesday, Novem 19, 2008, and briefly described the upcoming b ckup for that meeting. Attorne)fs Matters (8. 9:38) None. There bei no further business, the meeting was ad] reed at 8:35 p.m. Craig Flet er, Vice Chairman Date Beta Smith, Recording Secretary Date ` PZC/Unapproved 6 November 13,2008 F:/BCC/All Committees/PZC/2008Ag&M1n/PZC Minutes 11/13/08.doc ATTACH-UNT 1 143 ....-.......... . (W 2008 Survey of Vehicle Weight and Size Pick-up Trucks Vehicle Make/Model Gross Vehicle W ' t Length Height Cadillac Escalade EXT 4dr crew cab AWD 7,200 lbs 222 inches 74.5 inches Lincoln Mark LT 4dr super crew 4wd 7,200 Ibs 235.8 inches 76 inches Hummer 112 STJT 4dr crew cab 4wd 8 600 Ibs 189.8 inches 79.2 inches Honda.Rid elme RTL 4dr crew cab AWD 6,050 IN 207 inches 71.2 inches Ford F-450 Sup er DuW Lariat 4dr crew cab 4wd 14,500 Ibs 262.4 inches 79.8 inches Nissan titan LEFFV 4dr crew cab 4wd 5 1651bs 244.2 inches 76.4 inches GMC Sierra 3500 FID SLT 4dr crew cab 4wd 9,900 lbs 258.7 inches 76.1 inches GMC Sierra 1500 Denali 4dr crew cab AWD 7,000 Ibs 229.9 inches 73.7 inches To ota Tundra Limited 4dr crew max cab 4wd 7200 Ibs 228.7 inches 76 inches Do R,�m ick up 1500 Laramie 4dr crew cab.4wd. 6,800 Ibs 227.5 intim 74.8 inches Doti a Ram vickup 1500 Laramie 4dr quadpab 4wd. _._6 7001bs 229 inches 74.8 inches Chevrolet Avalanche LT Z 4dr crew cab 4wd 7,200 Ibs -1-221.3 inches 76.6 inches Chevrolet Avalanche LTZ 4dr crew cab SB RWD 7,000 Is 1 221.3 inches 76.6 inches Cargo Vans (W Vehicle Make/Model Gross Vehicle Weight Length Height Chevrolet E) ress C o 9,600 Ibs 244.1 inches 82 inches GMC Savana Caro 7,300 Is 224.1 inches 81.6 inches Da a Sprinter Caro 8,M Is 232.5 inches 96.3 inches Ford Boonoline Caro r 8,600 lbs 237 inches 84.6 inches Note: Length: 23 feet=276 inches Height: 9 feet= 108 inches 8 feet—96 inches i t I i i t j i FAComnwniry DcveiopmcntlUscmkCurDmAP3AMDO8 P9AC%veh3ciaLrg A"ACHMENT 1 1441 : ............... (bw 2008 Survey of Local Governments: Thresholds for Commercial Vehicles Parked in Residential Areas Jurisdiction Wei ht/Size/Ca aci Threshold Vero Beach <5,000 lbs(Eurrently being revised upward) Sebastian <23112n&x 9'hiRh Fellsmere Tn practice: allow dump tracks, school buses, "goats", eve but 18 wheelers St.Lucie g2Ruty < 10,000 IN Gross Vehicle Wei ht Martin Count < 1 ton cargo capacity Palm Be4ch County < 1 ton capacity and < 12,500 lbs Gross Vehicle Weight Height:5 9' Len <25' Sazaso�ta <7,200 lbs Gross Vehicle Weight No semi-trailers or trailers or dump trucks, or: - wreckers - bucket trucks - front end loaders,etc. - trucks with stake beds Manatee < 1 ton capacity and:5 9' in height (W Volusia < 10,500 lbs Gross Vehicle Wei t Osceola < 15,000 Is Gross Vehicle Weight Brevard <24' in,length Vienn VA <20,000 lbs Gross Vehicle Weight Baltimore Co,MB < 10,000 lbs Gross Vehicle Wei t -Albuquergae,NM <-I 0 000 lbs and can fit in 20' x 8.5' space Fairfax Co VA < 12,000 Is Gross Vehicle Weight Virginia Beach VA < 1 ton OnjDa ca. aci -Warwick RI <%900 lbs Gross Vehicle Weight Glendale AZ _;<_l ton chassis and 10,000 Is Gross Vehicle Weight Indian River County < 1 ton capacity No construction materials stored on outside of such vehicles. No vehicles hauling explosives, gasoline or liquefied t petroleum. Class "A" tow trucks/wreckers allowed only if on an eirkergency towin rotation with sheriff s office. F 5 { 1 F-%Ow=wdty Development%UsewlCarD&6\PSAC12002 PSACnreshoidsfomommvehiclesrtf ATTACHMENT � 145 f " ATRUECOPY � 2008- 021 CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE ` a�Louise Sche=d� Clerk,Ad lnWim AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER,COUNTY,FLORIDA CONCERNING AN AMENDMENT TO ITS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS); PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 901, DEFINITIONS; CHAPTER 911, ZONING, AND CHAPTER 912, SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, BY AMENDING GENERAL •PROVISIONS SECTION 911.15, AND BY AMENDING PARKING AND STORAGE SECTION 912.17, AND BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;CObIFICATION;SEVERABILITY;AND EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COIV HSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS(L1DRS) BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION#1: The definition of"Commercial vehicle"provided in section 901.03 of befinitions Is hereby amended to read'as follows: Commercial ,vehicle-any motor vehicle which. IOr" gne&er- u F,.t,.,A + i, or- nen fit 0 rgaRintien pweses-Of€ 9S — (1U1 Has a stet-, berq rack= for transportingfor t sLearlefiell of materials; or equipment; and items other than the personal effects of private passengers:,_or a boom that is visible when the vehicle Is nark ,including but not limited to bucket trucks, dump truckssemd-tractom semi-trailers. and other sbuilar vehictes;or (2) Exceeds a gross veh4ck weight of I5,000 92Mnds,a length of 23 feet L276 inches),or a heir-lit of 9 feet (108 inches), except that recreational vehicles, as defined in this section,shall not be considered as commercial vehicles. SECTION#2: Seddon 911.15(3)of General provisions is hereby amended to read as follows: (3) Parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. (a) REstrictibns on the parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. No commercial vehicles,as dg$ned do County CodeSectlon 90103,shall be parked overnight nod`for an extended period(more than ten(I0)hours in any calendar month)on any residentially used lot,in the stteet abutting such lot, or on residentially zoned land, , 2, sit A 3-disuiets,except: 1. age. p Within residential zoning districts, i one commereW vehicle consisting of a-pick-up truck or van with a rack for Hofd tiaderlinw_ Additions m Ordinance suit 8deugM Deleted Text from Exisdns Ordinance 1 F.iCotnmuaity DevolopmadUaars\CurDevlORpINANCi4200MON.—commeroial vehWes.RTF AVACHMENT 1 146 A TRUE Copy CEPTIFICATION QN LAST pAeg } J.K.BARTOIV,CLERK 2008- 021 transporting materlals or'eauipment and items other than the personal effects of r>tvate passengers, not exceeding a length-of 23 feet:-height of 9 feet, or gross vehicle weight of 15 000 wounds, shall be allowed per residential Pr ses, 2• Commercial vehicles temporarily parked on a lot for the purpose of providing construction, transportation, or other services specifically for the location where such vehicles are parked. 3. In no case shall a commercial vehicle which is used for hauling explosives, gasoline or liquefied petroleum products be pemutted to be parked for an extended period in a residential area. 4.- 'Class A" tow trucks or hydraulic wreckers, on an emergency towing service rotation list with the local sheriffs or police department, used by the resident of the premises, limited to one(1)per premises and parked off-street in a garage, carport or driveway. Under this paragraph, one (1) tow truck or wrecker is allowed to be parked or stored at a residence. 5. One commercial vehicle shall be allowed Per residentWl premises within the A- 1,A-2,and A-3 districts • SECIZOLV'#3: Section 91117.Parking and storage is hereby amended to read as follows: As restated from the "general provisions" subsection of Chapter 911, Zoning, the following regulations apply to parking commercial vehicles,parking or storing vehicles and the storage of boats and recreational vehicles,in residential areas. ' (1) Parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas (a) Restrictions on the parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas No eonunercial vehicles as defined in County Code Section 901.03,shall be parked overnight nor for an extended period(more than ten(10)hours in any calendar month)on any-residentially used lot,in the street abutting such lot,or on residentially zoned land,Mt induding d + a ?;er r �� a �.T,�.,M : ats;except: 1. GoMmeFeiVA (1) ton er less used . Within residential ziDDIM distr d& i one commercial vehicle consisting of a ufck uR truck or van ith an rack for _transpot and items other than the per effects f rl ate passenger not exceedina length o 23 feet height of 9&M or goss vehicle weight of 15,000 hounds,shall bg allowed per residential 1wernfses 2. Commercial vehicles temporarily parked on a lot for the purpose of providing construction, transportation, or other services specifically for the location where Sold Underline: Additions to Ordinance &9Q%4wem&Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance _ 2 RAC;owwnityDevelopmenauserslcnrDev\ORDINANCF=0&\20Q8---.-commerdsl vehicies.RTF ACHMENT l 147 A TRUE copy �' CERT' AT4OIw KLASTPAcE 2008-021 J.K.BARTON,CLERK 3. In no case shall a commercial vehicle which is used for hauling explosives, gasoline or liquefied petroleum products be permitted to be parked for an extended period in a residential area. 4. "Class A" tow trucks or hydraulic wreckers, on an emergency towing service rotation List with the local sheriff's or police department,used by the resident of the Premises, limited to one(1)per premises aid parked off-street in a garage,carport or driveway. Under this paragraph, one (1)tow truck or wrecker is allowed to be parked or stored at a residence. 5. Oue commercial vehicle shall be allowed ver residentialyremises within the A 1,A-2.and A 3 districts SECTION#4: SEVERABILITY If any clause.,section or provision of this Ordinance shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any cause or reason,the same shall be eliminated from this Ordinance and the remaining portion of this Ordinance shall be in Rill force and effect and be as valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated therein. SECTION#5: REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINAN(S The provisions of any other Indian River County ordinance that are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. SECTION#6: IIICLU I N IN THE COBE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances bf Indian Riva County, Flvaida. .The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish sugh, and word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", oI any other approprnate word. SECTION#7: MECr_TINE Il<ATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. Approved and adapted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,Florida, on this 16th day of Decpbw ,2008, t i This ordinance was advertised in thePress-Journal on the 2nd day of Deoaber 2008, { for a public hearing to be held on the 16th day of_D=Nber 2008, at which time it was # moved for adoption by Cornmissioner Flees ,seconded by Commissioner Davis and adopted by the following vote: Chairman Wesley S.Davis AYE _ Vice Chairman Joseph E.Flescher(W Botd Underunc Additions to Ordinanx S# a-tl Deleted Text than Exlaing ordinimm 3 - FACOMMnity DwdopmendUse slturDevtORD1NANCE12008\2008._commercial veGictes.RTF 148 . . ................ (W 2008_ 021 4 t Commissioner Gary C.Wheeler __AYE__ Commissioner Peter D.O'Bryan --LYE -------- Commissioner Bob Solari �yE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BY: Wesley Sbv / n�.-..�.. ATTEST BY: /0-: Mary Lout1Q WMA,GkvK Aa[!trbtM TEs ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: DEC 2 3 2008 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY 617 William G.Collins 11, County Attorney APPRO AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Ro CAM, eating, m laity opment Director STATE OF FLOPADA. INDIANR'COUNTY ' THIS iSTO CERTIFYTHATTHIS IB ATRQF.AHD CORREGTCOPYOF THE OAl41NAL ON FILE IN THIS- ' - OFFIC$.. t FFRBYK,QARTON�iCL_ERK�- BY ' 804 Underline: Additions to Ordinance -- 1 Deleted Text f+nm Existing Ordinence F.Tommunity Developrnont%Users\CurDev}ORDINANCE%200IN2008-_aommerdal vehidmRT'F ATTACHMENT 1 - 149 __..........................._...__......... _. (W docume to allow the County to el out the Grant, as ommended in the emorandum of December 4,2 8. DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 9. CONSTITUTIO OFFICERS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES- NE 10. PUBLIC ITEMS MAL CONSIDERATION OFAMENDMENTS TO RESTRICTIONS ON PARSING COMMERC g VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS:LDR CHAPTERS 90I;9.11,AND 9.12(LEGISLATIVE} (W PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR MING IS ON FILE IN TAB OFFICE OF TfiB CLERK TO THE BOARD Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the backup memorandum of December 8,2008,and used a PowerPoint(copy on file)to provide background and analysis on staff's request to consider amendments to Chapters 901,911,and 912 of the Land Development Regulations(LDR's), which pertain to currant restrictions on parking commercial vehicles in residential areas. He thereafter presented the recommendations of staff,the Professional Services Advisory Committee(PSAC),and the Planning and Zoning Commission(PZC),for approval of the required amendments to the LDR's,by adoption of the proposed Ordinance. Commissioner O'Bryan wondered about the inclusion of a 15,000 pound truck under the vehicle allowances in the proposed amendments. 15 (OW December 16,2008 ATTACHMEW 1 - 150 ............... ........ . _.............. . Director Boling acknowledged that the above was a heavy vehicle,but pointed out that staff was comfortable with the vehicle sizes,and wanted to have a clear dividing line between what is and is not permitted. He added that determinations had also been made as to the types of vehicles that would not be allowed,such as bucket trucks,dump trucks,and semi tractors. Vice Chairman Flescher supported the proposed amendments,citing cases where businesses have been forced to downsize and work from their own residences. He pointed out that the updated restrictions would not impact public roads aid badges, Commissioner Wheeler questioned staff on how long a commercial vehicle could be stored,and about whether the Ordinance update would impact the storage of recreational vehicles,such as boats. (W Staff thereafter responded to Commissioner Wheeler's concerns about the proposed Ordinance being too restrictive for landowners in agricultural zoning who might need to have on-site several trucks for a business operation. The Chairman opened the public hearing. Fred Mensing,7580129'Street,Sebastian,wanted to see exemptions from the size restrictions(in addition to exemptions granted to tow trucks)granted to emergency service vehicles and horse trailers which must be parked on-site at a residence. F t i 'f Director Boling felt that most commercial vehicles would fit in the size parameters set forth in the proposed amendments to the LDR's. s t There were no additional speakers and the Chairman closed the public hearing. 16 (W December 16,2008 ATTACHMENT 151 ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Flescher, SECONDED by Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 2008-021, concerning an amendment to its land development regulations(LDRs); providing for an amendment to Chapter 901, definitions; Chapter 911, zoning, and Chapter 912, single family development, by amending general provisions Section 911.15,and by amending parking and storage, section 912.17, and by providing for repeal of eonflioting provisions; codifications;severability;and effective date. .10..A.2. MCHBARING TO AWND CERTAIN!,, SOF THE ANIMAL C(W &MROL ORDINANCE CODIFIED AT CAA ER.302 OF THE RDL4jV& UNn CODB LEGISLATIVE PROOF OF PUBLICATION ADVERTISEMENT FOR G IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE O CLERK TO OARD John King,Director of Emergency ices,stated that he was accompanied by Jason Ogilvie,Animal Control Manager. Dir r recapped the backup memorandum of December 3,2008 and used a PowerPoint( y on file) rovide background on the request to amend certain sections of Chapter 302 the County Code, a Animal Control Ordinance. Director King summarized the key po' of the four basic areas ich staff wanted to update: (1)procedure for application,issu e,and renewal of license;(2)lic se fees;(3) impoundment,redemption,surre er,and disposition of non-quarantined imals; and(4) dogs which are involved in a ' g or attack incident. I i i 17 (W December 15,2008 i ATTACHMENT 162 ......... ..__... ORDINANCE 2013- (W Tele hone and telegraph p P p p Radio and television broadcasting P _ P p p Cable and pay T.V. p _ p p p Communications towers wireless facilities A A A A A A A Communications towers(non-wireless facilities a Amateur radio(accessory use Less than 80 feet P P P P P P P 80 feet or taller(see 971.44(4)for special S S S S S S S Criteria Commercial Up to 70 feet: Camouflaged P P p p p p p Non-camoufla ed P P P P P P P 70 feet to 150 feet: CaMpUgMEA A A A A A A A Monopole minimum oft users A A A A A. A A Not camouflaged and not monopole S S is S is S is Over 150 feet: All tower types(see 971.44(1)for special - - - - criteria Public and private utilitieslimited A A A A A A A Public and riate utilities heavy - - - - S SECTION#2: Amend LDR Section 911.15(7),General Provisions by deleting limitation on length of recreational vehicles,to read as follows: (7) Unenclosed storage of recreational vehicles, trailers and boats. (a) Any recreational vehicle not in normal daily usage for transportation of the occupants of the residence shall be considered as "stored" for purposes of this chapter. (b) Unenclosed storage of trailers, campers and boats; restrictions in residential zoning districts. Recreational vehicles and boats may be stored on any lot. However, any trailers, campers or boats which are stored in unenclosed areas on any single-family or two family lot in any residential zoning district shall meet the following standards: 1. Ownership of recreational vehicles and boats; authorized storage. Such storage shall be limited to vehicles owned by the occupant(s) of the residence or the house guests of the occupant(s). 2. Limitation on number of recreational vehicles. Not more than one recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be stored in an unenclosed area Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 2 Wks dwau& Deleted Text firom Existing Ordinance ' F.Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2013-_911,912 and 971(vehiclestorage veh).doe 1513 ............................ _... . .......... ORDINANCE 2013- (W upon each site,except that one additional recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six (6) weeks in any one-year period. 3. Limitation on number of boats. No more than one boat per dwelling unit shall be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site except that one additional boat per dwelling may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six (6) weeks in any one-year period. 4. Location of unenclosed storage areas Such storage shall not be located in any required front or side yard, or any easement; except that such vehicles may be stored on a designated driveway. 5. Licensing. Recreational vehicles and boat trailers shall have a valid motor vehicle license at all times-. 6. Use limitations. Recreational vehicles and boats shall not be used for office or commercial purposes, nor for sleeping, housekeeping or living quarters while so stored. 7. No public facilities hook-ups. No service facilities, such as water, sanitary, or electrical connections shall be attached; except a temporary electrical (W extension connected to the vehicle for battery charging or to facilitate repair is permitted. 8. Limitation on kngth o >r of recreational vehicles;: Consistent with the Chanter 901 definition of"Recreational vehicle", the overall size of a recreational vehicle stored outside on it residentially zoned lot shall not exceed four hundred(400) square feet �vehlcle length multiulied by width). No r-ear"ond veblele so stem shalls., (32) a:` lee al. •,> ,t +t- + +t. $-i�E-EHE'PrPE$-A�=-rn'v-t�z� ,.. ...��s..y pia,��,cs ssiul�r sn� leng&reqqkwaents mW be Med and heW by the Indian Pdvw County bear& ofson-ing ad. e..�oeavdof zoning the neighborhood (c) Storage of recreational vehicles and boats in multifamily residential areas. In any apartment, condominium or other multifamily use, recreational vehicle and boat storage may be permitted in a portion of a project which is specifically designated for recreational vehicle and/or boat parking; however, screening measures may also be required as a condition of site plan approval. No recreational vehicle or boat may be stored in the parking lot of a multifamily development, unless such parking lot has been designated on the approved site plan for the development as recreational vehicle storage area. (W BoW Underline: Additions to Ordinance 3 _ £fit Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 1?X=mvnity DevelopmenWAwNAOrdinances12o1312013- 911,912 and 971(vehicl ongerecveh).doc 154: _.._._._.. . . .. .. .._.......(W ..............._ ORDINANCE 2013- SECTION#3: Amend LDR Section 412.17(3),by deleting limitation on length of recreational vehicles,to read as follows: (3) Unenclosed storage of recreational vehicles, trailers and boats. (a) [Generally.] Any recreational vehicle not in normal daily usage for transportation of the occupants of the residence shall be considered as "stored"for purposes of this chapter. (b) Unenclosed storage of trailers, campers and boats, restrictions in residential zoning districts. Recreational vehicles and boats may be stored on any lot. However, any trailers, campers or boats which are stored in unenclosed areas on any single-family or two-family lot in any residential zoning district shall meet the following standards: 1. Ownership of recreational vehicles and boats, authorized storage. Such storage shall be limited to vehicles owned by the occupant(s) of the residence or the house guests of the occupant(s). 2. Limitation on number of recreational vehicles. No more than one recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site, except that one additional recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any one- year period. 3. Limitation on number of boats. No more than one boat per dwelling unit shall be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site except that one additional boat per dwelling may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six(6)weeks in any one-year period. 4. Location of unenclosed storage areas. Such storage shall not be located in any required front or side yard, or any easement; except that such vehicles may be stored on any designated driveway. 5. Licensing. Recreational vehicles and boat trailers shall have a valid motor vehicle license at all times. 6. Use limitations. Recreational vehicles and boats shall not be used for office or commercial purposes, nor for sleeping, housekeeping or living quarters while so stored. 7. No public facilities hook-ups. No service facilities, such as water, sanitary, or electrical connections shall be attached; except a (W Bold underline: Additions to Ordinance Spike dugs Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 4 _ F:1Community DeveIopmenAC urDc%AOrdimnces12013\2013- 911,912 and 971(vehic1ragerecveh).doc ATTACHMENT 155 _._.................... ..... . .. .. . . .............. (W ORDINANCE 2013- temporary electrical extension connected to the vehicle for battery charging or to facilitate repair is permitted. 8. Limitation on knk& overall size of recreational vehicles,-• Consistent with the Chapter 901 definition of "Recreational vehicle", the overall area of a recreational vehicle stored outside on a residentially zoned lot shall not exceed four hundred (400) square feet (vehicle length _multiplied by width). WAW we (32) fraoi• in length preli ea +imt in the event er....a, e ---.) ..... �...-) ..w. ... ..,..b...y t..v ra.av�. .+.w� ua .uv vi'vaar vx wuuuv this ehapter- as to the length feq filed and heard by the Man Pdver- the let ske ss ) , t i &eadr. SP,CTTON#4: Amend LDR Section 971.12,Commercial services,to read as follows: (1) Building material sales and lumberyards(administrative permit). (W (a) Districts requiring administrative permit approval, (pursuant to the provisions of 971.04):CG. (b) Additional information requirements: 1. A written statement defining the general inventory of materials to be sold on the premises; 2. Statements disclosing the projected percentage of total sales to be derived from wholesale activities; 3. A site plan showing the location of all principal structures and all on-site storage areas. (c) Criteria for construction material sales: 1. All materials to be sold on the premises must be completely screened from adjacent properties and roadways; 2. On-site vehicular storage shall be limited to those vehicles used in the operation of establishment; - 3. Such establishments shall not include the manufacture of structural wood components, roof trusses, wall units and other activities requiring the (W assembly of wood products; Hold Underilne. Additions to Ordinance 5 Solke+,ff ttglr Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance FACommunity DevelopmentlCurDevlOrdinances12013X2013- 9I 1,912 and 971 veiticlpgloragerecveh).doc k�rsaPu�WZM> � L 15 r Section 911.15 (3) (3) Parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. (a) Restrictions on theparking of commercial vehicles in residential areas.No commercial vehicles, as defined in County Code Section 90 1.03,shall be parked overnight nor for an extended period (more than ten (10) hours in any calendar month) on any residentially used lot, in the street abutting such lot,or on residentially zoned land,except: 1. Within residential zoning districts,one(1)commercial vehicle consisting of a pick-up truck or van with a rack for transporting materials or equipment and items other than the personal effects of private passengers,not exceeding a length of twenty-three(23)feet,height of nine (9) feet, or gross vehicle weight of fifteen thousand (15,000)pounds, shall be allowed per residential premises. 2. Commercial vehicles temporarily parked on a lot for the purpose of providing construction, transportation,or other services specifically for the location where such vehicles are parked. 3. In no case shall a commercial vehicle which is used for hauling explosives, gasoline or liquefied petroleum products be permitted to be parked for an extended period in a residential area. 4. "Class A"tow tracks or hydraulic wreckers,on an emergency towing service rotation list with the local sheriffs or police department,used by the resident of the premises,limited to one(1) (W per premises and parked off-street in a garage,carport or driveway.Under this paragraph,one (1)tow truck or wrecker is allowed to be parked or stored at a residence. 5. One(1)commercial vehicle shall be allowed per residential premises within the A-1,A-2,and A-3 districts. Section 912.17(1) (1)Parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. (a) Restrictions on the parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. No commercial vehicles, as defined in County Code_Section 901.03, shall be parked overnight nor for an extended period(more than ten(10)hours in any calendar month)on any residentially used lot,in the street abutting such lot,or on residentially zoned land,except: 1. Within residential zoning districts,one(1)commercial vehicle consisting of a pickup truck or van with a rack for transporting materials or equipment and items other than the personal effects of private passengers,not exceeding a length of twenty-three(23) feet, height of nine (9) feet, or gross vehicle weight of fifteen thousand (15,000) _ pounds, shall be allowed per residential premises. 2. Commercial vehicles temporarily parked on a .lot for the purpose of providing (W construction,transportation,or other services specifically for the location where such vehicles are parked. F.\Community DevelopmenACurDev\BCC12013 BCaCurnntComVeh f CIOAMT 157 (W 3. In no case shall a commercial vehicle which is used for hauling explosives,gasoline or liquefied petroleum products be permitted to be parked for an extended period in a residential area. 4. "Class A"tow trucks or hydraulic wreckers,on an emergency towing service rotation list with the local sheriffs or police department,used by the resident of the premises, limited to one(1)per premises and parked off-street in a garage,carport or driveway. Under this paragraph,one(1)tow truck or wrecker is allowed to be parked or stored at a residence. 5. One(1)commercial vehicle shall be allowed per residential premises within the A-1, A-2,and A-3 districts (2 (W F (W' 4 1 I F.TomrnunityDevelepmentlCurDevWCC\2013BCC\CurrentComV iTt V�I�pE�}'�'I� 1581 SUMMARY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS FOR PARKING COMMERCIAL VEHICLES OUTSIDE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS(WINTER 2013) In-r region Jurisdiction Restriction on Commercial Vehicles Brevard County Commercial pick-ups, cargo vans, 2-axle step vans, and trailers allowed within residential parcel boundaries. No weight or size limits specified. Fellsmere One commercial vehicle allowed in driveway. Following commercial vehicles not allowed on residential streets: • Over 10,000 lbs. empty weight • Semi-trailer trucks with more than 3 axles • Over 22,000 lb. c aci axle weight) r.. Hillsborough County One ton or less rated capacity allowed. Indian River County No bucket trucks, dump trucks, semi-tractors, semi-trailers, or similar vehicles. = Vehicles not exceeding 15,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight, 23 feet length,and 9 feet height allowed. Lake County Gross vehicle weight 12,000 lbs or less allowed. Manatee County One ton or less rated capacity and not exceeding 9 feet height allowed. Nine feet height limit waived if less than%ton capacity. Martin County One ton or less rated capacity allowed but must be in garage or screened from view of adjacent property and street. Public service vehicles exem ted Sarasota County No dump trucks, bucket trucks, semi-tractors, semi-trailers,wreckers, or construction vehicles. Vehicles not exceeding 6,000 lbs. a weight allowed. St. Lucie County No semi-trailers or industrial vehicles (bulldozers, cranes). Vehicles less than 10,000 lbs. ffoss vehicle wei t allowed, Vero Beach No truck tractors. Trucks,buses trailers not exceeding 5,000 lbs. allowed. Note:FDOT height maximum for non-oversized vehicles: 13' 6" FACommunity Development CurDcv\Ordk=ccs\2013\ParkWgCo—rcial-RWehialas.docx .i SUMMARY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS FOR PARING COMMERCIAL. VEHICLES OUTSIDE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS (WINTER 2013) Out-of-region Jurisdiedon Restriction on Commercial Vehicles Chesa eake,Virginia Vehicles not exceeding 20 feet length, 7 feet in height allowed. Durham,North Carolina No heavy equipment or tractor trailers. Vehicles not exceeding 30 feet overall length, 8 feet width and 12 feet height allowed Fairfax County,Virginia No trailers, semi-trailers,or any vehicle with 3 or more axles. Vehicles not exceeding gross vehicle weight of 12,000 lbs,21 feet length, 81/2 feet width, and 8 feet height allowed. 42- FACommunity DevelopumtUurDevlordinmasl2013%parkingCbo—iai-RVVehicl-do- Tj V SUMMARY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS FOR PARKING RECREATIONAL VEHICLES OUTSIDE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS (WINTER 2013) Jurisdiction Restriction on Recreational Vehicles Brevard County Parking on developed residential lot allowed. No size limits specified. Fellsmere RV not excesdiaa S feet width and 25 feet length allowed. Hillsborough County RV not exceeding 20 feet length in front yard allowed. RV exceeding 20 feet length allowed only in side and rear yard. Indian River County Existing: RV not exceeding 32 feet length allowed. Proposed Jan. 2013: RV not exceeding 400 square feet(vehicle length x width) allowed. Lake County Allowed. No size limits s ecified. Manatee County Allowed. LDRs reference state definition of RV not exceeding 400 square feet vehicle length x width). Martin County Allowed. No size limits specified. RV exceeding 25 feet length must be parked in front. Sarasota CEilpt I Allowed. No size limits specified. St. Lucie County Allowed No size limits specified. Vn Vero Beach Allowed. No size limits specified FACommunity DevelopiacntlCurDav\oidinancesUO131PaddasCommercial-RWehicles.docx Tj V (W 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS I2.A. COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT 12.A.1. CONSIDERATION OF REGULATIONS LIMITING THE SIZE OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLESAND RECREATIONAL VEHICLESPARKED OUTSIDE INRESIDENTm AREAS Planning Director Stan Boling recalled that on February 5,2013,Ron Heen had appeared before the Board requesting that the County change its Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to allow commercial vehicles taller than nine feet to be parked outside in residential areas, and staff was directed to evaluate the commercial vehicle regulations. Using a PowerPoint presentation(on file),Director Boling provided background, description,and analysis on the formal LDRs and the proposed amendment to change the commercial vehicle height limit from nine feet to nine and one-half feet,and to change the recreational vehicle(RV)length from 32 feet to an overall size of 400 square feet(length x width). MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Solari, SECONDED by Vice Chairman Davis, to direct staff to initiate a formal Land Development Regulation (LDR) amendment to change the existing limitation on the height of commercial vehicles parked in residential areas, and to update the current length limit for recreational vehicles (RVs) parked in residential areas, as recommended in the memorandum of March 11,2013. The Board clarified that Mr.Heen's truck is not more than 9.5 feet in height,and confirmed that staff did not recommend a change to the length limit of commercial vehicles,only the RV length. (W March 19,2013 17 ATTACHwif1' 6 16 2 ON AMENDED MOTION BY Dr. Day, AMENDED ,, SECOND BY Mr. Brognano, the members voted unanimously (4-0) to approve staff's recommendation to dismiss the appeal filed by the applicant on the basis that the applicant no longer owned the property because of foreclosure and did not have the permission of the current owner to go forward with his project; and authorize the Chairman to execute the to-be-revised Order Dismissing Appeal when approved in form by both parties. Chairman Zimmerman read the following into the record: B. Consideration of Amendments to Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Chapters 901; 911, and 912 to Change the Limitations for Size of Commercial Vehicles and Recreational Vehicles Parked Outside in Residential Areas [Legislative] Mr. Boling reviewed the information contained in his memorandum dated April 29, 2013 and gave a PowerPoint presentation, copies of which are on file in the Commission Office. He specified if it was adopted the proposed ordinance would increase the maximum allowable height of a commercial vehicle parked in a residential area from 9.0 feet to 9.5 feet and would also eliminate the existing 32 foot maximum length for Recreational Vehicles (RVs) parked outside in residential areas. In place of an RV length requirement, the ordinance would establish a maximum overall size for RVs, limiting the RV area (vehicle length multiplied by vehicle width) to 400 square feet. Mr. Boling concluded with staff's recommendation that the PZC recommend that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopt the proposed ordinance. Chairman Zimmerman opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Mr. Charles Searcy, 1035 22nd Avenue, Vero Beach, maintained it was an aesthetic nuisance to have a 9.5 foot vehicle with a sign parked across the street from him and was against the proposed ordinance. Mr. Dennis Green, 1045 21St Court, Vero Beach, distributed three sheets of paper showing photographs of houses on 22nd Avenue, which are on file in the Commission Office. He asserted the sheets numbered one and two depicted tidy homes with cars and pick-up trucks; but sheet three showing 1046 22nd Avenue PZC/Unapproved ATTAC1114 tf 1 7 May 9, 2013 163 was discordant with the neighborhood because of the size of the driveway and (W the box truck parked there. He asked the PZC not to approve the change in height restriction of commercial vehicles in residential areas. Mr. and Mrs. Ron Heen, 1046 22nd Avenue, Vero Beach, felt this issue was becoming a matter of personal neighborhood persecution against them. Mr. Jerry Schick, 1025 21St Court, Vero Beach, stated he was not in favor of the proposed ordinance. Mr. Jonathon Rose, 1036 21St Court, Vero Beach, did not approve of making a countywide change based on a single applicant's request and suggested it might be better to look at the issue based on the needs and requirements of the entire County before making a decision. Discussion.followed. Chairman Zimmerman asked if any member of the public had an objection to the proposed change regarding RVs. Mr. Searcy commented if the ordinance regarding RVs was changed from 32 feet to 400 square feet, it would mean a motor home of either 44 or 47 feet (aw long could park in a driveway in front of a residence, which was a huge difference. Chairman Zimmerman closed the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. Mr. Brognano did not see an issue with the proposed ordinance for a small business owner needing to store one truck of 9.5 feet in height on his property and he also had no issue with the change for RVs. Ms. Caldarone agreed, saying she saw no difference in adding six inches to the height limitation of a commercial vehicle and was fine with the proposed RV change. Dr. Day stated he did not have a problem with the proposed LDR amendment. ON MOTION BY Mr. Brognano, SECONDED BY Ms. Caldarone, the members voted (3-1) to approve the proposed ordinance to increase the maximum allowable height of a commercial vehicle parked in a residential area from 9.0 feet to 9.5 feet and establish a maximum overall size for RVs, limiting the RV area to 400 square feet. Chairman (W Zimmerman opposed. PZC/Unapproved AT'�AitHmtr 7 May 9, 2013 164 Chairman Zimmerman expressed he was not in favor of the 9.5 feet height Le for commercial vehicles but was in favor of the change concerning RVs. He indicated he did not see the point of changing the height to accommodate one person and did not feel there was that much of a compelling reason to make the change. Mr. Bob Keating, IRC Community Development Director, advised because there were only four members present staff would report to the BCC that there was essentially not a decision because there were not four positive votes; but there were three votes in favor and one against. Chairman Zimmerman asked the members for a separate motion to recommend the BCC approve establishing a maximum overall size for RVs, limiting the RV area to 400 square feet. Mr. Brognano wondered how a commercial vehicle of 9.5 in h-eight. was more of an eyesore than a 400 square feet RV. Chairman Zimmerman responded he did not see a groundswell of support to increase the height of commercial vehicles parked in residential areas, and was inclined to leave residential areas as residential. He thought it made sense to change the RV size because they were built bigger these days and he thought the code was outdated. No motion was made. Commissioner's Matters There were none. Planning Matters Mr. Boling related the PZC meeting for May 23, 2013 would likely be cancelled; however there would be a meeting on June 13, 2013. Attorney's Matters Attorney DeBraal clarified for those in attendance that the Chairman could not make a motion, which was why he had asked the other PZC members to make one on his behalf. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. PZC/Unapproved ATTACHMENT 7 May 9, 2013 165 ORDINANCE 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONCERNING AMENDMENTS TO ITS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS); PROVIDING (W FOR AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 901, DEFINITIONS, CHAPTER 911, ZONING, AND CHAPTER 912, SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 901.03, DEFINITION OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLE; BY AMENDING SECTION 911.15(3), PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS; BY AMENDING SECTION 911.15(7), UNENCLOSED STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, TRAILERS, AND BOATS; BY AMENDING SECTION 912.17(1), PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS; BY AMENDING SECTION 912.17(3), UNENCLOSED STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, TRAILERS, AND BOATS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; CODIFICATION; SEVERABILITY; AND EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRS) CHAPTER 901, DEFINITIONS, CHAPTER 911, ZONING, AND CHAPTER 912, SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, FOR SPECIFIC LAND USES, BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION#1: Amend LDR Section 901.03,Definition of Commercial Vehicle, to read as follows: Commercial vehicle any motor vehicle which (1) Has a rack for transporting materials or equipment and items other than the personal effects of private passengers, or a boom that is visible when the vehicle is parked, including but not limited to bucket trucks, dump trucks, semi-tractors, semi-trailers, and other similar vehicles; or (2) Exceeds a gross vehicle weight of fifteen thousand (15,000) pounds, a length of twenty- three (23) feet (two hundred seventy-six (276) inches), or a height of (once hundr-edeight (1 09) in nine and a half (9 '/Z) feet (one hundred fourteen (114) inches), except that recreational vehicles, as defined in this section, shall not be considered as commercial vehicles. SECTION#2: Amend LDR Section 911.15(3), Parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas, to read as follows: (3) Parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. (a) Restrictions on the parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. No commercial vehicles, as defined in County Code Section 901.03, shall be parked overnight nor for an extended period (more than ten (10) hours in any calendar month) on any residentially used lot, in the street abutting such lot, or on residentially zoned land, (W except: Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance �[ aFalCH �M� 11T 1 So h: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2013-_901,911,912(commandrecvehs).doc ORDINANCE 2013- 1. Within residential zoning districts, one (1) commercial vehicle, eensisting ^� 1pr-i3vate passeng not exceeding a length of �n� o+ twenty-three(23)feet, a height of �nine and a half(91/z) feet,of and a gross vehicle weight of fifteen thousand (15,000) pounds, shall be allowed per residential premises. Said commercial vehicle may include a rack for transporting material or equipment and items other than the personal effects of private passengers. 2. Commercial vehicles temporarily parked on a lot for the purpose of providing construction, transportation, or other services specifically for the location where such vehicles are parked. 3. In no case shall a commercial vehicle which is used for hauling explosives, gasoline or liquefied petroleum products be permitted to be parked for an extended period in a residential area. 4. "Class A tow trucks or hydraulic wreckers, on an emergency towing service rotation list with the local sheriffs or police department, used by the resident of the premises, limited to one (1) per premises and parked off-street in a garage, carport or driveway. Under this paragraph, one (1) tow truck or wrecker is allowed to be parked or stored at a residence. 5. One (1) commercial vehicle shall be allowed per residential premises within the A- 1, A-2, and A-3 districts. SECTION #3: Amend LDR Section 912.17(1), Parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas, to read as follows: (1) Parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. (a) Restrictions on the parking of commercial vehicles in residential areas. No commercial vehicles, as defined in County Code Section 901.03' shall be parked overnight nor for an extended period (more than ten (10) hours in any calendar month) on any residentially used lot, in the street abutting such lot, or on residentially zoned land, except: 1. Within residential zoning districts, one (1) commercial vehicle.,eensisfing of + �+ r a items ether- than +.'.-.e senal eff-eets of private passengers not exceeding a length of twenty-three (23) feet, a height ofunci nine and a half(9 '/Z) feet, or and a gross vehicle weight of fifteen thousand (15,000) pounds, shall be allowed per residential premises. Said commercial vehicle may include a rack for transporting material or equipment and items other than the (W personal effects of private passengers.. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance ATTACHMENT 8 2 St6ke Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 167 67 F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2013-_901,91 1,912(commandrecvehs).doc ORDINANCE 2013- 2. Commercial vehicles temporarily parked on a lot for the purpose of providing construction, transportation, or other services specifically for the location (W where such vehicles are parked. 3. In no case shall a commercial vehicle which is used for hauling explosives, gasoline or liquefied petroleum products be permitted to be parked for an extended period in a residential area. 4. "Class A" tow trucks or hydraulic wreckers, on an emergency towing service rotation list with the local sheriff s or police department,used by the resident of the premises, limited to one (1) per premises and parked off-street in a garage, carport or driveway. Under this paragraph, one (1) tow truck or wrecker is allowed to be parked or stored at a residence. 5. One (1) commercial vehicle shall be allowed per residential premises within the A-1, A-2, and A-3 districts SECTION#4: Amend LDR Section 911.15(7), Unenclosed storage of recreational vehicles, trailers and boats, by deleting limitation on length of recreational vehicles,to read as follows: (7) Unenclosed storage of recreational vehicles, trailers and boats. (W (a) Any recreational vehicle not in normal daily usage for transportation of the occupants of the residence shall be considered as "stored" for purposes of this chapter. (b) Unenclosed storage of trailers, campers and boats; restrictions in residential zoning districts. Recreational vehicles and boats may be stored on any lot. However, any trailers, campers or boats which are stored in unenclosed areas on any single-family or two family lot in any residential zoning district shall meet the following standards: 1. Ownership of recreational vehicles and boats; authorized storage. Such storage shall be limited to vehicles owned by the occupant(s) of the residence or the house guests of the occupant(s). 2. Limitation on number of recreational vehicles. Not more than one recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site, except that one additional recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six (6) weeks in any one-year period. 3. Limitation on number of boats. No more than one boat per dwelling unit shall be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site except that one (W additional boat per dwelling may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six (6) Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance A'TACHIAger s 3 Strike gh, Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance Q F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2013-_901,911,912(commandrecvehs).doc V ORDINANCE 2013- weeks in any one-year period. 4. Location of unenclosed storage areas. Such storage shall not be located in any required front or side yard, or any easement; except that such vehicles may be stored on a designated driveway. 5. Licensing. Recreational vehicles and boat trailers shall have a valid motor vehicle license at all times. 6. Use limitations. Recreational vehicles and boats shall not be used for office or commercial purposes, nor for sleeping, housekeeping or living quarters while so stored. 7. No public facilities hook-ups. No service facilities, such as water, sanitary, or electrical connections shall be attached; except a temporary electrical extension connected to the vehicle for battery charging or to facilitate repair is permitted. 8. Limitation on kngA overall size of recreational vehicles;--_. vas : Consistent with the Chapter 901 definition of"Recreational vehicle", the overall size of a recreational vehicle stored outside on a residentially zoned lot shall not exceed four hundred (400) square feet (vehicle length multiplied by width). Ne -ee-emienal vehne stored- shall be : exeess ef thifty twe (32) feet in length, pEeyirled tlzntin th event of . «.l..e hardship petitions for- a r-ia ee_to thisehapte as to tl.e length r-equir-ements may be filed and heard by the ladian River- Geu*ty board of zoning adjustment. The bear-d-of zoning adjustment, eensider-afien of'., e1, appeal, may eensi er_the size of the ehiele tL.e lotsize in question and the availaoi ef adeqtwAe safeguards to pr- the neighber-heed. (c) Storage of recreational vehicles and boats in multifamily residential areas. In any apartment, condominium or other multifamily use, recreational vehicle and boat storage may be permitted in a portion of a project which is specifically designated for recreational vehicle and/or boat parking; however, screening measures may also be required as a condition of site plan approval. No recreational vehicle or boat may be stored in the parking lot of a multifamily development, unless such parking lot has been designated on the approved site plan for the development as recreational vehicle storage area. SECTION#3: Amend LDR Section 912.17(3),by deleting limitation on length of recreational vehicles,to read as follows: (3) Unenclosed storage of recreational vehicles, trailers and boats. Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance ATTACHMENT 4. eM Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance 169 F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2013-_901,911,912(commandrecvehs).doc ORDINANCE 20.13- (a) [Generally.] Any recreational vehicle not in normal daily usage for transportation of the occupants of the residence shall be considered as "stored" for purposes of this chapter. (b) Unenclosed storage of trailers, campers and boats; restrictions in residential zoning districts. Recreational vehicles and boats may be stored on any lot. However, any trailers, campers or boats which are stored in unenclosed areas on any single-family or two-family lot in any residential zoning district shall meet the following standards: 1. Ownership of recreational vehicles and boats; authorized storage. Such storage shall be limited to vehicles owned by the occupant(s) of the residence or the house guests of the occupant(s). 2. Limitation on number of recreational vehicles. No more than one recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site, except that one additional recreational vehicle per dwelling unit may be parked on the property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any one- year period. 3. Limitation on number of boats. No more than one boat per dwelling unit shall be stored in an unenclosed area upon each site except that one additional boat per dwelling may be parked on the (W property for a period not in excess of two (2) weeks in any continuous time period or six(6)weeks in any one-year period. 4. Location of unenclosed storage areas. Such storage shall not be located in any required front or side yard, or any easement;except that such vehicles may be stored on any designated driveway. 5. Licensing. Recreational vehicles and boat trailers shall have a valid motor vehicle license at all times. 6. Use limitations. Recreational vehicles and boats shall not be used for office or commercial purposes, nor for sleeping, housekeeping or living quarters while so stored. 7. No public facilities hook-ups. No service facilities, such as water, sanitary, or electrical connections shall be attached; except a temporary electrical extension connected to the vehicle for battery charging or to facilitate repair is permitted. 8. Limitation on kength overall size of recreational vehicles; Wig. Consistent with the Chanter 901 definition of "Recreational vehicle", the overall area of a recreational (W vehicle stored outside on a residentially zoned lot shall not exceed four hundred (400) square feet (vehicle leneth Bold Underline: Additions to Ordinance 5 St h: Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance O F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2013-_901,911,912(commandrecvehs).doc M"Al waeuraa~ A ORDINANCE 2013- multiplied by width). No vehiele so a shall b in r L-11 thirpfthat in the event of un hardsnip pet.Tr�,rru ror-c�arrarrE$-to this ee apter-as-to t adjustment;ements maybe filed and heard by the Indian Rivef County board 6f the board P a• + +in its any sueh 1 appeal, may ��"i�'v` "-V� 1�1 e ef the 1 , 1V V4 J1Z�p ' the ll�jJp�ped. SECTION#4: SEVERABILITY If any clause, section or provision of this Ordinance shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid for any cause or reason, the same shall be eliminated from this Ordinance and the remaining portion of this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect and be as valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated therein. SECTION#5: REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES The provisions of any other Indian River County ordinance that are inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. SECTION#6: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or any other appropriate word. SECTION#7: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. This ordinance was advertised in the Press-Journal on the day of . 2013, for a public hearing to be held on the day of , 2013, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner ,and Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Wesley S. Davis Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Bold Underline: Additions to OrdinanceA17Af�HIRENT a 6 SWEe thmugl! Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance V F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2013-_901,911,912(commandrecvehs).doc 171 ORDINANCE 2013- BY: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller BY: Deputy Clerk This ordinance was filed with the Department of State on the following date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY (;- lan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney APP R VED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS Obert M. eating, IC ; Comm ty Development Director Bold Underline: Additions to OrdinanceA'CACliME1 $ 7 Stfike t;,reugh! Deleted Text from Existing Ordinance { i' 172 F:\Community Development\CurDev\Ordinances\2013\2013-_901,911,912(commandrecvehs).doc Proposed LDR Amendments: Size of Commercial Vehicles and RVs Parked Outside in Residential Areas Board of County Commissioners June 18, 2013 • 2/5/13 BCC heard request from Ron Heen ■ Property in RS-6 district (1046 22nd Ave) • 3/19/13 BCC heard staff analysis, directed staff to initiate LDR amendments 2 Two Changes Increase commercial vehicle height from 9' to 9.5' Update (increase) RV maximum length, currently 32 feet 3 Heen Property r e 8 McyhSare ' A 4 Heen Property (cont'd) Y 1. I Heen Propert cont'd rie Y `cta ti ..✓/ F mss,.. "b y 2008 Changes r Ford F-250 Super Duty 3/4 ton n 9S Ford F-350 m Super Duty 1 ton pi19�u' h Ford F-450 Super Duty 1.25 ton 2008 Changes (cont'd) y 671 _µ 8 � 7� � 4 2008 Changes (cont'd) 901 Definition Changes ()W Has a rack; for transporting materials; or equipment; and items other than the personal effects of private passengers: ora boom that is visible_ when the vehicle is parked including but not limited to bucket trucks dump trucks semi-tractors semi-trailers, and other similar vehicles;or (2) Exceeds a$ross vehicle weight of 15,000 pounds,a length of 23 feet (276 inched or a height of 9 feet (108 inches), except that recreational vehicles as defined in this section, shall not be considered as commercial vehicles. 9 2008 Changes (cont'd) Changes to 911 .15 1. r t vehieles withrated 1 it _ of ene i1 ton eF less used by t sident of t1, rr 1imimaterials shall be ster-ed on the ,a eutside ems= noes— Within residential zoning districts, one commercial vehicle consisting of a pick-up truck or van with a rack for transporting materials or equipment and items other than the personal effects of private passengers, not exceeding a length of 23 feet, height of 9 feet, or gross vehicle weight of 15,000 Rounds, shall be allowed per residential premises. 10 I ZA 5 INTENT OF RESTRICTIONS ■ Allow a single, small-scale or close-to- medium-scale commercial vehicle at a residence ■ Prevent large, out-of-place vehicles and an aesthetic nuisance ■ Set an easily measureable standard 2013 Research COMMERCIAL VEHICLE LENGTH Chesapeake, VA 20' Fairfax, VA 21' Sebastian, FL 23' Indian River County 23' Brevard County 24' Palm Beach County 26' Durham, NC 30' Average: 23.86' ]2 l ?a - 6 2013 Research (cont'd) COMMERCIAL VEHICLE HEIGHT Chesapeake, VA 7' Fairfax, VA 8' Manatee, FL 9' Indian River County 9' Sebastian, FL 9' Palm Beach County 9' Durham, NC 12' Average: 9' 13 Staff Position o Existing 23' length and 9' height limits are reasonable o Increasing height to 9.5' also within reasonable limits o Making multiple incremental changes would be substantive 14 /4Z - 6/28/2013 Recreational Vehicles (RVs) o Most jurisdictions surveyed had no RV length limits o IBC's existing RV length limit of 32' is outdated o Previous proposal on RV length passed PZC, defeated with CL proposal at BCC last February 15 PZC considered 5/9/2013 o Some residents opposed, raised concerns about commercial vehicles o All 4 PZC members supported RV changes E Voted 3 to 1 to support commercial vehicle change to 9.5' maximum 16 / ,� 8 Proposed ordinance o Increase commercial vehicle maximum height from 9.0' to 9.5' o Replace RV length limit (32') with 400 square foot size limit (length x width) 17 Staff Recommendation That the BCC adopt the proposed ordinance 18 of " 9 MAW SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS �' Indian River Press Journal SCRIPPS U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960 IPPS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared,Sherri Cipriani,who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal,a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County,Florida:that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County,Florida,and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County,Florida,daily and distributed in Indian River County,Florida,for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person,firm or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach,Indian River County,Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ad Pub Customer Number Date Copvline PO# INDIAN RIVER CO PLANNING 2521387 6/3/2013 PUBLIC HEARING 6-18-13 BCC NEWSPAPER E-Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED ********************* DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES Sworn and subs r' ed before me this day of, June 03, 2013, by who is Sherri Cypriani ORIGINAL [X] personally known to me or [ ] who has duced as identification. Mary T. By a Notary Public —.— — Mar.a. MARY 7 BYRNE Notary Public State of fee W My Comm.Expires Aug 2.2014 Commission#Ef 7134 TCPALM.COM CLASSIFIED IR MONDAY,JUNE 3,2013 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS 11 OROIMANCES NOTICEOF NOTICE OF NOTICE OF NOTICEOF C &PETITIONS FORECLOSURE FORECLOSURE FORECLOSURE FORECLOSURE NOTICE OF PUBLIC CIVIL DIVISION Judicial Circuit in ING AN INTEREST I Daryl,@ HEARING Case No.: and for Indian Riva. THE SURPLUS of Igrouy.nm O 200SCA010741 ounty,Florida, FROM THE SALE,IF 11.04348 NOS () herein US BANK ANY,OTHER THAN Notice to Parson, T NOTICE IS HEREBY NATIONSTAR MORT-NATIONAL ASSO- THE PROPERTY with Disabilities:If C GIVEN at the GAGELLC, CIATION,AS TRUS- OWNER AS OF THE > n A Board of Co untY Plaintiff, TEE FOR CITIGROUP DATE OF THE LIS w;M a`disebi6ty`wlio Commis•lon.. of MORTGAGE LOAN PENDENS MUST eed..7 acmnmo m IrMien River County,EMILY S.FAGNANT; TRUST,INC.,MORT- FILE A CLAIM WITH- III- order 1. N Florid.+hall hold a ET.AL, G A G F P A S S- IN 60 DAYS AFTER par[I vey ,in this Q public h'erinp an Ddandann, THROUGH CERTIFI- THE SALE. �rocerdin,.Yau are D. in askaetr in in- GATES,SERIES ntrclad,an no,or cod to red c then° NOTICE OF 2006-WF2 I the Dated this 23 day of You,to the Provision 7 he have an aPyon FORECLOSURE SALE %ainBR and RUBY J. Me,,2013. f cenam...hence. CL Nnpy to be Iwrd 1n SWEET AIKIA RUBY By:Broca K.Fay P,h,I co men Corrie E6 ` the my Commix NOTICE IS HEREBY SWEET: VERO Bar Number.9]300 Johnson,ADA Coor- o Cham ban of GIVEN Ounuem tp a BEACH HIGHLANDS Submined by: dinator,250 NW [he County Adminia- Hnal Judamrru def- OWNERS'ASSOCIA-Lew Mo.of Country Club Drive, /� Is. O trati n Building lo- •d May 2.2813 an TION,INC.;UN-Choiw Legal Group. Suite 21],Port St. I,^i 3 M_ [ed et 1801 2]lh red in Civil Case KNOWN TENANT PA Lucia,FL 34988, vI Street,Vero Bach, No:2009CA010741. IS):IN POSSESSION 1800 NW 491h Strati, 1)]2)80)-43]0 at 0 O Rorida,on Tuesday,of the Circuit Court OF THE SUBJECT Suit°120 least]days before CL Jun•1a,2013 N abod I the Ninnanth Ju- PROPERTY r de-R Loudekall.FL your sohed.led mon m.to pr..d., of Ch—,in and random,. Th.Clark 33x9 m vnnnn.,or.m 0 k ado tion of an o,d,- for Indian River of this Court shall Tal:195414530385 diagtely upon ra- W T nen'wuNed: Cherein NATION- and be nhbidder for PHMARYTED E-MAIL cshinpthastlmsHRbe- W L U AN ORDINANCE OF STAR MORTGAGE, u'h elemroni-I at FOR SERVICE fare t/ he scheduled i INDIAN RIVER U.C.is Plaintiff,and ww .Indien-River-PURSUANT TO FIA. appeer°nca i+len I^1 _ COUNTY FLORIDA. DAVID P.DOSDH: .raalfoadow-an in R JUD.ADMIN 2.516 then]doge;it you V 0. :3 C gME NDM AMENDMENTS TO KNOW NDPAgTIALL ES tion`46.01,,Florida with palgr®P om pr pa ndin±ll lj Dice V W C ITSMENTN LAND DEVELOP- THROIUGH,ONDE, Slatiha ISit daypW Not,,1.O Panonv Pub:Jun. T,�0 SZ11m 5a_ TIONSV, IIN GLF O R HE E NGAINST THE NAMED IN- lowing de.2013.. behe d You M.arae�ihnee:If IN THE CIRCUIT ftp, N a •O AM ENDMENTS TO DIVIDUAL DEFEN. prope�.°set fonh w'hadiaabiiM`who COURT OF THE 19TH Li. CHAPTER 901,DEFT- DANT"' WHO ARE s d F i n a I with any a—.— JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. r NITIONS,CHAPTER NOT KNOWN To JWpment,to it: dation order to IN AND FOR 1 Z = IL y 811,ZONING,AND DEAD OR ALIVE,LOT 4,BLOCK)a, perti0ip an`in this INDIAN RIVER l CHAPTEfl 912, IN WHETHER SAID UN- VERO BEACH NIGH- eroceeEE rep,you era COUNTY,FLORIDA �_ O Q GLE-FAMILY DEVEL- KNOWN PARTIES LAND$, UNIT Isidl no inn 1p CIVIL DIVISION NO.: 0 P M E N T; B Y MAY CLAIM AN IN.THREE.ACCORDING You,t0 the provision 312011CA CASE XXX W ; AMENDING SEC- TEREST AS TO THE PLAT of certain a..inence. X%X C U TION OF COMMERI- DEVISEES,GpANT- ED INTHEREOF, PUTRECORD- BOOK 8. Johnson,ADA Co.,- '� CIAL VEHICLE;BY EES OR OTHER PAGE 41,OF THE dinar Or,26`Gr` NW U SSOCIATION NAS O ; AMENDING SEC- CWMANTS;INDIAN CURRENT PUBLIC Country Club Drive, O O TION 911.1513), RIVER CO UNTY, RECORDS OF INDI- Suite 2l),Pon St. TRUSTEE FOR pe N PARKING OF LOM- FLORIDA;JOHN DOE AN RIVER COUNTY, Lucie,FIL 3d9Be, MASTR ASSET- Y. I,L MERCIAL VEHICLES AND JANE DOE AS RONDA ()]2)80)-13]0 at BACKED SECURI- d TIES TRUST 2105- _ Z 9 A RESIDENTIAL UNKNOWN TEN- Ieeat]tlaya belore AREAS;BY AMEND_ ANTS IN POSSES-ANY PERSON CLAIM- .our achetlulad mart WFu ING SECTION .ION,en De len- IVIG AN INTEREST npp�erance.or int-%ainuH, l6 e11.151J1,UNEN- deme. THE SURPLUS dnt jw'q'onre-PAMELA M.METZ; CLOSED STORAGE JEFFREY K.BARYON. FROM THE SALE,IF niviny hie nobfice- CITIFINANCIAL ED- OF RECREATIONAL he Clark of Court ANY,OTHEfl THAN tion It the lima be- 4.1 VE H I CLE S,TRAI L- Shall yell to the high- THE PROPERTY fore the scheduled UNTY SERVICES, Q ERS.ANO BOATS; re bidder f0,cath OWNER AS OF THE app.aran cv is lees INC.;WILLIAM G. BY AMENDING SEC- online at wvrw.i red- DATE OF THE LIS than]days;if you ME NAN TuNN POSKNOWH N TION 812.171 11, ie-river Ballo r- PENDENS MUST era hearing or oma O PARKING OF COM- eclose.com`et tO:D0 ME A CLAIM WITH- paired,call)11. SESANT; SION OF THE MERCIAL VEHICLES a on he 1Th dery IN 60 DAYS AFTER Pub:June 3,10,201] SUBJECT PROPER- CCC IN RESIDENTIAL of June,2013 Lhe to- THE SALE. TCN2521649 Defendants. L O G ING FSSECTION neat ing I P,.,Mcaa se[Dated this 23 day of IN THE CIRCUIT 912.1 J13),LINEN- forth in said Final Mal(,x136 COURT OF THE 19TH NOTICE OF _ 7 JUDICML CIRCUIT, FORECLOSURESALE Z Q } OF RECRCLOSED EATIONAL LOORAGE T @I BLOCKK LT- BarN Bsber.973De IN FOR VEHICLES,TRAIL- R U S GA RDE NS,Subrnhwal by: INDIgN RIVER NOTICE IS HEREBY •k— ERS,AND BOATS; ACCORDING TO THE Law OFce of COUNT DIVISION GIVEN pursuant to AND BY PROVIDING PLAT THEREOF,AS Choi,Lepel Group, CIVIL DIVISION Ann o V w USE LA0. Forelcl0sure dated ' V N FOR REPEAL OF RECORDED IN PLAT PA. 312012 CA2251 the tmh day of May, 40 CONFLICTING PRO- BOOK 3.PAGE 81,1000 NW 49th Street. 2013,end entered in L3 VISIONS;CODIFICA- OF THE PUBUC RE-Sade 120 JPMORGAN CHASE C e s e N U Q O TION;SEVERABILI- CORDS OF INDIAN FrLe.derdale,R BANK,NATIONAL 312011CA003140KK TV;AND EFFECTIVE RIVER COUNTY,xx9 ASSOCIATION, XXXX,of the Circuit C DATE. RONDA. Tel:195414539365 %aimiH, Court of the 19TH Property address:660 DESIGNATED Judicial Circuit in d Said ordinance,if 42nd Court,Vero PRIMARY E-MAIL CAflY E.BERG; red for Indian River 01 dopted,will be s8 Beech,Florida MISS FOR SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF County,Florida, A halve in th,unin-If you.ary,parson PURSUANT TO FIA THE TREASURY- herein US BANK CL P.r.wd area of Isiming a rip ht to T JUD.ADMIN 2.516 INTERNAL REVENUE NATIONAL ASSO- che_rny and will (undo remain inp e i @ B E q V C E CIATION,AS TR S. commercial after the sal•,you clepalyyroup.mm M 0 R T G A G E TEE FOO MASTR AS C vehicle,with en in- n file a deim ter Nott 2]NOS ELECTRONIC REGIS- SET-BACKED SECU- N ued heipM up to [ha clerk no later Notice to Pervonv TRATION SYSTEMS RITIES TRUST 20D5- w ins and s hell het then fib d,Ys eller with Dinbilitie,:If INCORPORATED AS WF1 the Plain[ifl residential arae the este. Il you fail p'ou ere aspera on A NOMINEE FOR d PAMELA M. f0 and allow rscneuom n fila s claim you [h a d1,b11"M who MFC MORTGAGE METZ:CITIFINAN. to to v el veMde'na l0 ex- atilt not i.rand d ID ode arty snommo- INC.OF FLORIDA: CIAL EQUITY SERV four hundred y ramainilip fund,. dation in oeder to THE LAKES AT ICES,INC.:WILLIAM M � N aguara len hundred Ahar 6D day.,only penicl y,ate in this SANDRIDGE HOME- G.METZ III;IAM r r dLw longg h x vehicle the owner of record eproc'atlinp,rDD are OWNERS ASSOCIA- KNOWN TENANT w dlhl to be atorrd of the dao of the m[Isd,et no net.to TION INC:HEATHER (5);IN POSSESSION N x C wde in a resident lis pa nd.n,may You,al the Dmmaln M.BERG;UN. OF THE SUBJECT L0 O uvlarn. daim the surplus. f artein essinenc•' KNOWN TENANT;IN PROPERTY are de- Plaa'a nmers Cords POSSESSION OF landanu. The Clerk N C A draft of the pro-Dated this 21 day of Johnson,ADA Coor- PO SUBJECT N of of this Court shell Dosed ordinance n Mey,2013. dinatar,250 NW THTY ,ell to the hiBheet vailable et Ne Plain By:Joshua Sebes Country Club Drive,Dafendann. end be bidder/or sing Division office E,uire Suits 217 Port Bt. ush vlenronicelly at >— located in the cont- He.Be,No.:85356 Lucie,Ft 34986; NOTICE OF .Indian-River- Humry drvaloDmem Printeryry EmaO: 1]]21 aD)-43)0 a FpgECLOSUE SALE ireeiforecloae.rom in N division on the frY JSabet@Etwlaw. Iee't]days belore accords.-with aec- floor of the Count dour scheduled coon NOTICE IS HEREBY on 45.031.Florid° Adminiatrnion Com- Semndery Email: mpepearance,or int- GIVEN pure.ant t0 Statutes a4 10:00 AM 3 d of,,Building A'. ErwPeralepal.SNa@ B1dutely upon re- Final Judgment of n the 18th day f An1�o e who may EwsLew.com cio y hi,natifiu- Forecl0'ure dated jun,,2013,the fol. ieh[b apPeal any AOomey for%ainutF. n 11 Cha time ba-the lgth dry of Mey, lowing de+cribed Z N decision,which may ElimbM R Wellborn, lore the scheduled 2013,and an,.I in rope sa sN fonh Q. ; be mad.a[ his PA Ape Ira... leas C. No.312012 P mad. Final C y eelipy wgl need t0 350 Jim M,an Blvd. then]deyr If you CA2251,of the Cir- Judgmrm,to wie C IL�, n Lbal a Y.rb.- Spee 1Do .r.hewing ar Yom° D t coprt.f he C Q r Z um ord of the pro- Daefisld Beech.FL P'I,d,up]11. 19TH Judicial Circuit .sr dings is m,ds, 33442 Pub:Juu 3.11,x13 n dor Indian Igo-THE SOUTH 1l2 OF L N which indude,tnti- Telayhane: TCN25218a5 LOTS 3 ANO 4. Z O L@ d evidence 195413643544 ar County,F0"R"1a BLOCK F,STEVENS _ O mony and the cep- Facsimile: IN THE CIRCUIT M1erein JPMORGAt� ppRK UNIT NO.1, upon w COURT OF THE 19TH CHASE BANK,NA- ACCORDING TO THE N N O V -11.word. 195a13543515 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. TIONAL ASS PIAT THEREOF RF- Q l l 3 BU420]O NOS IN AND FOR TION is the Plaintiff CORDED IN PLAT U) V Pleat° direct IN ACCORDAN CE INDIAN RIVER dCARV E.BERG; BOOK 4,AT PAGE planning-rel algid WITH THE AMERI- COUNTY,FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 63,PUBLIC RE. q. was to 1M mr- CAN WITH DISH- CIVIL DIVISION THE TREASURY- CORDS OF INDIAN 1.s�n1to develo Amen[ BIUTIES ACT,If you CASE NO.: INTERNAL REVENUE RIVER COUNTY. ` n n 22&123). r• person with a 312D1261n1282 S E R V I C E FLORIDA. I isability who needs M O fl T G A G ANY Y O N E WHO O en oaccommodetion F— JPMOflGAN CHASE ELECTRONIC REGIS,qNY PERSON LTAIM- NEEDS A SPECIAL rdvr to partici- BANK,NATIONAL TRATION SYSTEMS NG AN INTEREST I C ACCOMMODATION Ane in this pro vd- ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED AS THE SURPLUS FOR THIS MEETING rp,You an'nmled,plaint R, A NOMINEE FOO FROM THE SALE,IF •O MUST CONTACT nno rev to you,to MFC MORTGAGE ANY OTHER THAN ` THE COUNTY'S the n mY'sion o(ur DIEDRE HANCOCK; INC.OF FLORIDA; THE PROPERTY M AMERICANS WITH • DEPARTMENT OF THE LAKES AT OWNER AS OF THE DISABILITIES ACT %eanswmamsCorde THE TREASURY-IN- SANDRIWE HOME- DATE OF THE LIS e� CL IA DA)COORDINA- Johnson,ADA Coor- TE RNA'REVENUE OWNERS ASSOCIM PENDENS MU.T TOR AT 2281223 AT dineto r,259 NW SERVICE;HUGX A. TION INC;HEATHER RUE A CLAIM WITN- ��..1l CL LEAST a HOURS IN Country Club Drive, Ye. HANLOC K;UN- M.BERG'UN- IN 60 DAYS AFTER N ADVANCE OF THE Suite 21I,Port St. KNOWN TENANT;IN KNOWN TENANT THE SALE. MEETING. Lucia,FL 34988, POSSESSION OF ISI;IN POSSESSION rjMsMaE .:L C4 R (7721 807-d3J0 at THE SUBJECT PROP- OF TEE SUBJECT Dated this 23 day of - ORDS `\ INDIAN RIVER lean I days before ERT• PflOPERTY ere de- May.2013. d COUNTY .our scheduled mT Defendants. (an0ants. The Clerk 8..Bru,K.Fey dL+ BOARD OF CWNTV on or or of this Court hall Bar Number:9)308 �. COMMISSIONERS diet.ly u...ra- NOTICE OF Bell to the highest Submined by: BY-a J,eph cat q hie ougca- FORECLOSURE SALE end beat bidder for Law MK.of E.Headier, tion If the time be- teen electronically et Ch01a Legal Group, w Chairmen fors Cha ached lass NOTICE IS HEREBY war,.Indian-River-PA, @Iseek. ppearance GIVEN Pur.us"to .rnlloreclose.nm in 1800 NW 49th Street I Pub J ne 3,2013 th 7 d yv;of'I' F nal Judgment of acnrdancs wth sec Su'u 130 O V TLN2521x) heart e117 or voice Forecl os urs dated 'on 45.031,Florida RLauderdale,R C - hnpa had II711 by 10th day of May, Statins+a,10:00 AM=in �r•L. m Pub J 3.10,2013 p013,and enuretl m n the lath day of Tel:1g54)453Ux5 M •Q TCN25214. C s N o Jun•,2013,the to DESIGNATED •� FICSIW@US NAE}E. IN THE CIRCUIT 312012CA0012fi2,of lowing described pgIMARY E-MAIL `l•.S7 y COURT OF THE 19TH the Cncult COun of ropeMi a°set fonh FOq SERVICE NOTICE UNDER JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, he 19TH Jud c aI Pn e d F n a PURSUANT TO R.A. as m FILTITM NAME IN AND FOR Circuit in and for In Jud9mam,to wn: FL A D.ADMIN 2.516 7 LAW PURSUANT TO INDIAN LAVER digin River County,LOT B9,THE LAKES 'u@ Y- •y SECTION 865.09, COUNTY.FLORIDA Florida,wherein LAT A S OflIDGE,de4elgrouo.c."n FLORIDA STATUTES CIVIL DIVISION JPMORGAH CHASE PHA 5 E I P 0, 1.9]M1DS CASE ryD.: BANK,NATIONAL ACCORDING TO THE Notice to Person' V NOTICE IS HEREBY 201161003080 ASSOCIATION,a the PLAT THEREOF AS i DnabI Ries:If C GIVEN that the,un. Plaintiff and DIEDRE RECORDED IN PLAT you ere s G `/9 Q Q ^e':n' opnad,dnpmp US BANK NATIONAL HANCOCK.DEPART- BOOK tB,PAGES 40 witM1 a disabiliry`w6o m;u�aYYa in buss- ASSOCIATION.AS MENT OF THE TREA- THROUGH 43,IN- Beds any s«anmo- Ear the Rdi- TRUSTEE FOR CITI- 5URY-INTERNAL CLUSIVE,OF THE dation in order to @ nous name of Angers GROUP FOR HE SERVICE, PUBLIC RECORDS pa rticipet,in this Promerty Man•Ba- LOAN TRUST,INC., HUGH A.HANCOCK OF INDIAN RIVER 6mcaetlinp,you ere s located n 170 MORTGAGE PAS.- d UNKNOWN COUNTY,FLORIDA mllad,n no nn I. N Empress Avenue,in THROUGH CERTIFI- TENANTISI IN POS- you,to the provision •O Ns County of Indian CATES,SERIES SESSION OF THE ANY PERSON CLAIM- of canal."alliance. Rryar,in the Ery of 2xeWFI, SUBJECT PROPERTY IVIG AN INTEREST peen contact Carrie •� Sebastian,Florida%einuH, defendants. The TXE S U fl P L U 5 Johnson,ADA Coor- Cl- 32968,intends to Clark of this Court FROM THE .ALE,N dinatar,250 NW �� re lstar Iha id RUBY J.SWEET 'hell sell to Ne li ggh ANY,OTHER THAN Country Club Or I". I s nh the Wt.pIKIA RUBY SWEET et and bnl bidtler THE PROPERTY Su to 211,Port St. He Cc L. f Corporation' VERO BEACH HIGH for ush elettroncel. OWNER AS OF THE Luce,FL 34906. w of tlw Honhafda Depen- LANDS OWNERS' ly at www,lnd an GATE OF THE LIS (]]2)80)43]0 at VDI: ret of S[ats,Tella- ASSOCIATION.INC.; Rver.real(oreclosec PENDENS MUST least]deya before �. haeae,Rorida. THE UNKNOWN om in aaordance FILE A CLAIM WITH your scheduled roan SPOUSE OF RUBY J. with version 45.031, IN 80 DAY.AFTER epaerance,or im- _ ■� N Dated at Vero Beech, SWEET AIKIA RUBY Florida Statute,at, THE SALE. Idienly upon ra- �^ d Flonda,his 29 day SWEET;UNKNOWN 1090 AM,the 18th ol hie I..be- TENANT; An Manelp en1`ry SSESSION OF THE UBJECT PRO ER- ahoto I bedlowingOdy9 1+1eY.2013.8runDated his 11 dKYFey fore tP:he I.. lcri Probe y By ppeara nce is lea+ an Forth in said Final Bar Numbers 9]308 than)days;if you 0. d NA gI W Pub:June 3,2013 Nwna s. J. M,to w2 Submined by. en hearing or voice Im Z N TCN2521992 OT t,BLOCK 19,Law0fin of paired uil]tt. f� L NOTICE OF VERO LAKE ES-Choice Legal Group, Pub June 3,1g,2013 FOECLOSUE SALE TATE.UNIT LA0.I,PA TCN2621658 F ACCOflDING TO THE 1000 NW 491h Snae[, NOTICE OF NOTICE IS HEREBY PLAT THEREOF,AS Suite 120 C THE CIRCUIT FORECLOSURE GIVEN pursuant to BECORDEO IN PLAT HLeuderdals,Fl COURT NINETEENTH THE N THE CIRCUIT Final Judgment of BOOK d,PAGE Be.33x9 ICALC COURT OF THE Foreclosure dated OFTHE PUBLIC RE-TeL:191)4539x5 JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN NINETEENTH Na 10th day of May, CORDS OF INDIAN DESIGNATED AND FOR INDIAN JUDICIAL CIRWIT x13,end entered m RIVER COUNTY,PRIMARY E-MAIL RIVER COUNTY, IN AND FOR INDIAN Case No.2011 CA FLORIDA FOR SERVICE FLORIDA —it IN RIVER FLORIDA Court CCDourt,of the 19TH ANY PERSON CLAIM-R JUD.ADMIN 2.518 312012CAD0229� 16A or(,,, Public Hearing -B.CC 06.18.13 y Office of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorne�.S(f DATE: June 11, 2013 SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Consideration of Proposed Natural Gas Franchise Agreement with Florida City Gas (W BACKGROUND. On May 7, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance 2013-004, which requires that any entity using the public rights-of-way to distribute natural gas in the unincorporated county obtain a franchise agreement and pay a franchise fee of 6% of gross revenues. The ordinance takes effect on July 1,2013. Currently, there is one natural gas distributor operating within the unincorporated county—Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, doing business as Florida City Gas ("FCG"). Natural gas distribution is regulated by the Florida Public Service Commission ("PSC'), and, similar to the electric utility situation, FCG has been assigned the territory of Indian River County by the PSC. FCG has filed a formal application with the county for a franchise to serve the unincorporated areas of the county, an electronic copy of which has been provided to each commissioner. Indian River Co. Approved Date APPROVED FOR JUNE 18,2013 B.C.C.MEETING Admin. 3 PUBLIC HEARING Co.Atty. 1' Budget 6 171 artment --- -/-- (� Risk Management COUIVTYATTORNEY F.•IAttornry�LtmdalGcmrdl8 C CL48rn&M,m W, -16m F—hl.04.d- 173 Board of County Commissioners June 11, 2013 Page Two County staff and FCG have successfully negotiated a proposed franchise agreement, which is submitted for the Board's consideration and approval. Pursuant to chapter 59-1380, Laws of Florida, which is a special act of the Florida Legislature dealing specifically with utility franchises in Indian River County, the franchise agreement can be approved, and the franchise granted, only after a public hearing. DISCUSSION. Important features of the proposed franchise agreement include the following: • The franchise term begins on July 1, 2013, and terminates 25 years later, on June 30, 2038 • Rates, fees and charges are those approved by the PSC • FCG will pay a franchise fee of 6% of gross revenues, which is consistent with other franchise or fee-in-lieu-of-franchise fees paid by other utilities using the public rights- of-way • FCG will maintain general liability insurance in the amount of $5,000,000. The County will be listed as an additional named insured on the policy • The franchise is non-exclusive • Other miscellaneous provisions are consistent with chapter 59-1380 and other franchise agreements which the county has with other utility providers. Because FCG, like Florida Power & Light ("FP&L"), is regulated by the PSC, the proposed franchise agreement is similar to the County's franchise with FP&L One item which is not covered in the proposed franchise agreement is: What happens with FCG's pipes and other facilities if and when the franchise ends? This is the issue which has created difficulties with the water/wastewater franchise agreements which the County has with the City of Vero Beach. After significant discussions,the conclusion was that —as is the case with the FP&L franchise—the issue would not be addressed in the agreement because (1) with natural gas being regulated by the PSC, and territories being assigned by PSC, if the franchise with FCG ever terminates and FCG no longer serves Indian River County, the PSC will assign a new company to serve the area, and FCG will end up selling its pipes/ facilities to the new company, and (2) unlike the situation with water/wastewater, the County does not have a'natural gas utility. Thus, reversion of the pipes/facilities to the County would not result in County service to the residents. The County would end up doing the same thing — namely, selling the pipes/facilities to a new company approved by the PSC. In the end, it was decided that the issue would be (W handled through the PSC, rather than through the franchise agreement. As stated, this is how the issue is dealt with under the FP&L franchise. F:NrlomffkLinda1General•B C Mgend A4emorWalural Gas Frmrchim 04,doc 174 Board of County Commissioners June 11, 2013 Page Three FINANCIAL IMPACT. Under the County's right-of-way ordinances, FCG presently pays permit fees for construction within the rights-of-way, and a right-of-way user fee of$500 per pipe per mile—which generates revenue of slightly over $14,000 per year. Under the ordinance and the proposed franchise agreement, the permit and user fees will be eliminated and replaced with the 6% franchise fee. FCG has roughly estimated that total franchise fees will equal about $15,000 to $30,000 during the initial years of the franchise. Although the number seems low to County staff, staff has no way of verifying the number at the present time. RECOMMENDATION. The County Attorney recommends that the Chairman open the public hearing, take public input, and close the public hearing, and that the Board then consider approval of the proposed franchise agreement. ATTACHMENT(S). Proposed Natural Gas Non-Exclusive Franchise Agreement ASP:LAC (WI F.UtromeyQJnda%GeneralO CCWgenda Memo$Watuml Gas Franck"04.dm 175 NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT This NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into this day of June, 2013 between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, ("County"), and Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., a New Jersey corporation d/b/a Florida City Gas ("Franchisee"). (County and Franchisee shall sometimes be collectively referred to as the"Parties"and, individually, as a"Party"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County desires to grant a non-exclusive franchise to permit the construction,maintenance and operation of Natural Gas facilities within the County; and WHEREAS,the Franchisee is capable of providing such services. NOW,THEREFORE,the Parties agree as follows: SECTION 1.DEFINITIONS a. "County" shall mean Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida. b. "Franchise" shall mean this Agreement and the rights granted to (W Franchisee hereunder. C. "Franchisee" shall mean Pivotal Utility Holdings, Inc., a New Jersey corporation d/b/a Florida City Gas, and its successors and approved assigns. d. "Gas System Facilities" or"Facilities" shall mean and include, but not be limited to, gas mains, pipes, supply pipes, conduits, ducts, service connections, manholes, regulators, drip pots, control devices, and any other hardware or other appurtenances used as a means of conveying, distributing or selling Natural Gas for the purpose of supplying Natural Gas to the meter of the Customer, constructed both prior to and during the term of this Agreement. e. "Customers" shall mean all residences, businesses, governmental entities and industrial establishments located within the County purchasing Natural Gas from Franchisee. f. "FPSC" shall mean the Florida Public Service Commission. g. "Franchise Fee" shall mean the fees described in Section 8 of this (W Agreement. 1 176 h. "Gross Revenues" shall have the meaning ascribed to such term by the (W FPSC. i. "Natural Gas" shall mean natural gas in a gaseous state unmixed or a mixture of natural and artificial gas, whether manufactured, "landfill" or otherwise. j. "Service Area" shall mean the unincorporated area of Indian River County, and shall not include the territory within any incorporated municipality within the County. k. "Uncollectible Accounts" shall mean any account which has been closed and the deposit applied and is 60 days past due. SECTION 2. FRANCHISE The County hereby grants to the Franchisee, and the Franchisee hereby accepts, the non-exclusive right, privilege and franchise to construct, maintain and operate only Gas System Facilities in, under, upon, over and across the present and future streets, alleys, bridges, easements and other public rights-of-way within the Service Area. The Franchisee shall construct,maintain and operate Gas System Facilities in accordance with established industry practices, and applicable federal, state and local law, including the orders,rules and regulations of the FPSC or any other regulatory body having jurisdiction over the Franchisee and, to the extent permitted by law, the County's installation, maintenance and operation standards in respect of Natural Gas. The Franchise term shall be the period of time commencing as of the effective date of this Agreement and continuing in full force and effect until expiring at midnight on June 30, 2038; provided, however, that the Franchise will automatically renew for successive ten (10) year terms until such time as one of the Parties notifies the other, with no less than two (2) years written notice, prior to the expiration of the then-current term, that it does not want the Franchise to automatically renew. If either Party elects not to renew the Franchise, then the Franchise shall expire upon the conclusion of the then current term. The County acknowledges that the rates, fees, and charges that Franchisee charges its customers pursuant to this Agreement are determined by the FPSC. This grant of authority to Franchisee is strictly limited to the provision of Natural Gas service only. It is explicitly recognized that this Franchise does not limit the Franchisee's ability to operate a liquefied petroleum (commonly referred to as LP gas, bottled gas, or propane) business within the Service Area, similar to any other liquefied petroleum business, nor does it limit the County's ability to assess a franchise fee upon the liquefied petroleum business within the limits permitted under Florida law. In the event Franchisee desires to use its existing Facilities or to construct new Facilities for the purpose of providing other utility or non-utility services to existing or potential (W Customers, including but not limited to providing public communications, leased fiber 2 177 optic capacity, video services, telecommunication services or any other services other than the provision of services, or providing any other use to existing or potential Customers, Franchisee shall seek additional and separate permission from the County for such activities. The Franchisee shall not sell, assign, lease or otherwise alienate and transfer this Franchise without the prior consent of the County, provided that such consent shall be granted or withheld in accordance with Chapter 59-1380, Section 4(g), of the Laws of Florida. To the extent that applicable law requires a public hearing before such consent may be given, the County shall hold a public hearing in compliance with applicable law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Franchisee shall have the right, without obtaining the County's consent, to transfer or assign this Franchise as a result of a total or complete merger or consolidation of Franchisee with a third party, or sale of the Franchisee's Natural Gas division assets. Any sale, assignment, lease or other alienation and transfer of this Franchise shall be subject to the conditions that the successor-in-interest to the Facilities and/or the rights under this Franchise shall have agreed in writing to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any dispute relating to or arising out of the provisions of this paragraph shall be subject to the non-binding arbitration provisions set forth below, in Section 19 of this Agreement. Franchisee may, without obtaining the County's consent, pledge this Franchise and/or the facilities as security. (W SECTION 3. USE AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY Franchisee's Gas System Facilities shall be located or relocated and so constructed as not to interfere with, including but not limited to, sanitary sewers, force mains, drainage systems,water pipes, electrical conduits, communications cables or other public utility service facilities, existing at the time of such location, relocation or construction. The Franchisee's Facilities shall not obstruct or interfere with the public uses of streets, roads, highways or alleys, or create any conditions which are or may become dangerous to the traveling public. Above grade facilities shall be kept to a minimum, and shall be installed as near to the outer boundaries of the public rights-of- way as reasonably possible. The location or relocation of all Facilities shall be made after Franchisee has received all applicable permits, approvals and permissions from the County and such other governmental entities as may be necessary, and the location(s) or relocation(s) shall be subject to the County's supervision and approval. In consideration for the Franchise Fee paid under this Agreement, the Franchisee will not be assessed any permit fees associated with the installation, construction, repair or maintenance of any Gas System Facilities within the public rights-of-way. In the event that Franchisee is acting in its proprietary function as a retail provider of gas equipment or appliances, Franchisee shall seek the appropriate permits from the County. Franchisee shall cooperate with the County at all times by providing timely and complete information regarding the location of its Facilities. Franchisee and County shall cooperate and coordinate their efforts to make the most efficient and economical use of the public rights-of-way and the (W Gas System Facilities. 3 178 If any street, highway or avenue is to be paved by the County, the County shall give written notice to the Franchisee not less than ninety (90) days prior to the (W commencement of paving. Provided the Franchisee does not already have a main in the street, highway or avenue to provide Natural Gas service to the surrounding houses and other structures, Franchisee shall survey the surrounding houses and other structures to determine whether, in its sole discretion, construction of Gas System Facilities in the street, highway or avenue in question is economically feasible. Where such construction is determined to be economically feasible, the Franchisee shall construct such Gas System Facilities in the street, highway or avenue in question prior to paving by the County. However, in the event the Franchisee believes that such construction may not be completed prior to County's planned paving schedule, the Parties will attempt to negotiate a revised paving schedule satisfactory to both Parties; provided,however,that if a delay in paving will cause additional expense to the County, or substantial inconvenience to the residents of the County, the County may proceed with its original paving schedule. The Franchisee shall, at its own expense, replace, repair and restore without delay any sidewalk, street, alley, pavement, water, sewer or other utility line or appurtenance, soil, landscaping, dirt or other improvement,property or structure of any nature,that may be damaged or displaced by the Franchisee in the conduct of its operations, and shall, at a minimum, restore all property to a condition equivalent to the condition immediately prior to the work and/or changes made by the Franchisee. Franchisee shall take safety precautions to alert the public of work, which may include, but is not limited to, the use (W of barricades and signs. The Franchisee shall move or remove any Gas System Facilities at no cost to the County, in the event of the widening, repair or reconstruction of'any street, road, alley or other right-of-way by the County. The Franchisee and the County shall not be liable for any cost or expense in connection with the location or relocation of its Gas System Facilities at the request of any nongovernmental third party. Such requests shall not be honored until such non-governmental third party has made arrangements to reimburse the Franchisee and/or the County, as the case may be, in a manner satisfactory to such Party(ies). SECTION 4.INSURANCE The Franchisee, at all times during the exercise of its Franchise, shall carry general liability insurance in the amount of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00) to indemnify any persons sustaining personal injury or property damage as a result of the actions of the Franchisee in the construction, operation or maintenance of its Facilities, The County shall be named as an additional insured. A certificate of insurance(including additional insured status) shall be filed with the County Administrator, or his/her designee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Franchisee may meet the insurance minimum using, in part or whole, any combination of self-insurance and captive insurance. In the event Franchisee elects to meet the insurance minimum using, in part or whole, any combination of self-insurance or captive insurance, the Franchisee shall 4 179 provide the County with documentation attesting to its qualified status. To insure that the amount of liability insurance or self-insurance is consistent with industry standards, as (W such standards may change during the lengthy term of the Franchise (including renewals or extensions), the Parties agree to meet approximately every five years to evaluate whether the amount of liability insurance or self-insurance provided under this Agreement is consistent with then-existing industry standards. If the Parties determine in good faith that the amount of liability insurance or self-insurance is less than the then- existing industry standard, the amount of such insurance shall be increased to be consistent with such standard. SECTION 5 INSTALLATION OF GAS MAINS; MAP OF GAS LINES Before the commencement of the construction of any Gas System Facilities, the Franchisee shall,provide a drawing to the County establishing the location, lines or any other information reasonably requested by the County in connection with the Gas System Facilities. The laying of such Facilities shall conform to the designated locations, lines or other conditions of the County. After completion of the installation of any Facilities, two copies of complete location maps will be furnished to the County. The Franchisee and the County shall cooperate with respect to the form and format of the location maps. Franchisee agrees that the materials to be used in the construction, operation and maintenance of the Gas System Facilities and the service to be rendered shall be consistent with local industry standards and equivalent to those provided to the Franchisee's other franchised communities. The Franchisee shall, at all times, keep an accurate map showing the location of all Gas System Facilities laid and maintained by Franchisee under this Franchise, which shall be accessible for inspection by County officials upon advance written notice during reasonable business hours. SECTION 6 ACCIDENTS OR DAMAGES; EMERGENCIES The County shall not be liable or responsible in any manner whatsoever for any accident, personal injury, property damage or any claim or damage that may occur in the course of the construction, operation or maintenance of any of its Facilities by Franchisee, and its employees, agents, contractors, and any third parties hired by Franchisee to perform any aspect of Franchisee's responsibilities under this Agreement, except for damages specifically caused by or arising out of the negligence, strict liability, intentional torts or criminal acts of the County. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to affect in any way the County's rights, privileges, and immunities under the doctrine of"sovereign immunity"as set forth in Section 768.28,Florida Statutes. The County acknowledges that, in the event of an emergency involving the Gas System Facilities, Franchisee's obligations to notify various constituents of such circumstances are regulated by the FPSC. (W 5 180 SECTION 7.INDEMNIFICATION (W Franchisee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the County, its commissioners, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, regulatory or administrative proceedings (including reasonable attorney's fees, including appeals), liabilities and expenses arising during the term of this Franchise and resulting in personal injury, loss of life or damage to property sustained by any person or entity (collectively "Claims") caused by or arising out of Franchisee's negligence, intentional torts, strict liability, breach of applicable law or breach of this Agreement in connection with the construction, operation or maintenance of its Gas System Facilities within the Service Area, except for Claims caused by or arising out of the negligence, strict liability, intentional torts, breach of applicable law or breach of this Agreement by the County. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to affect in any way the County's rights, privileges, and immunities under the doctrine of"sovereign immunity" as set forth in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. The provisions of this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. SECTION 8.FRANCHISE FEE Within thirty (30) days after the close of the first full billing month (payment for which shall include any prior partial month) following the effective date of this Franchise Agreement, and each month thereafter during the term of this Franchise Agreement, the Franchisee shall pay to the County a Franchise Fee which, when added to the amount of all licenses, excises, fees, charges and other impositions of any kind whatsoever (except ad valorem property taxes and non-ad valorem tax assessments on property) levied or imposed by the County against Franchisee's property, business or operations and those of its subsidiaries, is equal to six percent (6%) of the Franchisee's Gross Revenues, less any adjustments for Uncollectible Accounts, from the sale, transportation, distribution or delivery of Natural Gas to Customers within the Service Area. In the event any Uncollectible Account becomes collectible and/or is collected, an adjustment in amount due the County shall be made in the next monthly payment. The Franchise Fee payment shall be deemed paid on time if post-marked within thirty (30) days of the close of the preceding billing month. SECTION 9.RIGHT OF COUNTY TO INTERVENE The County reserves to itself the right to intervene in any suit, action or proceeding involving any provision of this Agreement. Franchisee agrees to advise the County of any such suits. SECTION 10.ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS: RIGHTS TO AUDIT The Franchisee shall establish and maintain appropriate accounts in accordance with generally accepted accounting methods, and shall maintain records in such detail that Gross Revenues within the limits of the Service Area are consistently declared and (r identified separately from all other revenues. All records shall be maintained for a 6 181 minimum of three (3) years, or longer if required by applicable regulatory bodies. The Franchisee further agrees that the County, by any duly authorized representative, shall have the right during business hours, and with prior written notice, to inspect and/or audit the books and records of the Franchisee that evidence the Gross Revenues and computations of Franchise Fee payments made by the Franchisee to the County. If the County decides to inspect and/or audit Franchisee's books and records, specifically Franchise Fee payments made to the County and Franchise Fee computations, the Franchisee shall permit a County representative to review the pertinent portion of the Franchisee's books and records including billing and collection records during normal business hours. The Franchisee and the County shall cooperate with respect to the location of production and format of such books and records, to the end of minimizing the cost for both parties. In the event that an audit of Franchisee's books determines that Franchisee made underpayment in any month and that the underpayment exceeded five percent (5%) of the amount actually due in such month, Franchisee shall pay interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum on the amount underpaid or not paid calculated from the date the amount was due to the date it was finally paid. Both the underpayment and interest shall be paid within thirty (30) days after receipt of demand from the County. SECTION 11. CHANGES TO THE SERVICE AREA Upon the County's becoming aware that the Service Area has changed due to the annexation or incorporation of any property within the Service Area by a municipality or other body, the County shall promptly notify Franchisee of such circumstances and cooperate with Franchisee to determine any necessary adjustments to the Franchise Fee that may be necessary. SECTION 12.FORFEITURE OR REVOCATION OF FRANCHISE The Franchisee's material failure to comply in any respect with any of the provisions of this Franchise after written notice from County and a reasonable opportunity, no less than one hundred and eighty (180) days, to cure shall be grounds for forfeiture of this Franchise pursuant to which the County shall have the right to revoke and cancel all franchise rights granted in this Agreement; provided, however, that Franchisee's failure to comply with any provision of this Franchise as the result of a strike, lockout, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the Franchisee (collectively, "Force Majeure") shall not constitute grounds for the County's revocation and cancellation of any rights hereunder. In the event Franchisee in good faith disputes the County's determination of the Franchisee's material non-compliance with the provision(s) of this Franchise specified in the County's notice, or the County disputes the Franchisee's assertion that its failure to comply with the provision(s) of this Franchise was or is the result of Force Majeure, the Franchisee and the County shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the dispute prior to submitting the dispute to non-binding arbitration as provided below. If any dispute remains unresolved thirty (30) days after the commencement of negotiations pursuant to this Section, such dispute may, at the election of either Party, be submitted to non-binding arbitration pursuant to the provisions of 7 182 Section 19 of this Agreement. Nothing in this Section 12 shall be construed as obligating (W a Party to negotiate or arbitrate a renewal or extension of this Franchise. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, Franchisee acknowledges that nothing contained in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver by the County of any rights it may possess at law (including but not limited to the power of eminent domain), or as afforded under Chapter 125,Florida Statutes. SECTION 13.DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES The following individuals are designated to represent the County and Franchisee respectively on all matters concerning the Franchise. All written communication shall be given by mail, either regular or certified with return receipt requested, to the addresses provided, or at such other address as either Party may advise the other in writing: For the County: County Administrator 1801 27`h Street Vero Beach,FL 32960 With a copy to: County Attorney 1801 27a' Street Vero Beach,FL 32960 For the Franchisee: General Manager (W Florida City Gas 955 East 25 Street Hialeah,FL 32955 With a copy to: AGL Resources Inc. Ten Peachtree Place Atlanta, GA 30309 Attention: General Counsel SECTION 14.NO WAIVER Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a surrender or waiver by the County of(a) its police powers or the authority to regulate the use of the public streets and/or other public places, provided no regulation contravenes the material terms of this Franchise, and(b)its right to sovereign immunity. SECTION 15.RIGHT TO ENFORCE Each Party shall have all rights and remedies available in law or in equity in the event of a material breach of any obligation set forth in this Agreement by the other Party. (W 8 183 SECTION 16.ATTORNEY FEES Except as otherwise provided, County and Franchisee agree that if litigation or administrative proceedings become necessary to enforce any of the obligations,terms and conditions of this Franchise, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, including fees and costs on appeal, from the non- prevailing Party. If the subject matter of the dispute was submitted to non-binding arbitration pursuant to Section 19 below, the term"prevailing Party" in the prior sentence shall mean the Party for whom the final judicial or administrative decision is more favorable than the non-binding arbitration decision. SECTION 17.ENTIRETY This writing embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties, and there are no other agreements and understandings, oral or written, with reference to this subject matter that are not merged and superseded. SECTION 18. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Florida, and venue shall be in Indian River County, Florida. SECTION 19.NON-BINDING ARBITRATION ,,. Either Party shall have the right to submit a dispute arising under this Agreement to non-binding arbitration by notifying the other Party of such election in writing within forty-five (45) days after the dispute arises. Within fifteen(15) days following the giving of such a notice by a Party, each Party shall furnish the other Party with the name, address and telephone number of a person designated by that Party to participate with a person designated by the other Party in selecting an individual to act as the sole arbitrator of the dispute. If a Party fails to designate to the other Party a person to participate in the selection of the sole arbitrator, or if the persons so designated by the Parties fail, within thirty (30) days following the giving of notice of the dispute by the Party invoking the provisions of this section, to agree on a sole arbitrator of the dispute, either Party shall have the right to apply to the Circuit Court for the 19th Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida for the appointment of such sole arbitrator. The Parties agree that the timing of, and rules governing the conduct of, the non-binding arbitration proceeding shall, unless otherwise agreed, be determined by the sole arbitrator in accordance with applicable law. Unless otherwise agreed,the place of arbitration shall be Indian River County, Florida. In making any award, the arbitrator shall be subject to any provisions of this Franchise which expressly limit remedies or damages. The Parties shall share equally the compensation and expenses of the arbitrator and the expense of any hearing, and each Party shall bear the compensation and expenses of its own counsel and other representatives (if any). Each Party shall continue to perform its obligations under this Franchise pending final resolution of any dispute submitted to non-binding arbitration (W pursuant to this section, unless to do so would be impossible or impracticable under the 9 184 circumstances. Notwithstanding the pendency of any arbitration proceeding hereunder, a Party, without prejudice to the above procedures, may file a judicial or administrative complaint for statute of limitations or venue reasons, or seek a preliminary injunction or other provisional judicial or administrative relief, if in its sole judgment, such action is necessary to avoid irreparable damage or to preserve the status quo. Despite such action, the Parties will continue to participate in good faith in the non-binding arbitration provided for above. Either Party may file judicial or administrative proceedings to obtain a binding decision, if such Parry does not agree with the arbitration decision. In such event, Section 16 above shall apply with respect to an award of attorney's fees and court costs. SECTION 20.EFFECTIVE DATE This Franchise Agreement shall become effective upon its acceptance by the Franchisee,which acceptance must be evidenced in writing by signature of this document within thirty(30) days of the County's passage and adoption hereof. WHEREFORE, the Parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement on the date first written above. ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith,Clerk of Court BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, and Comptroller INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA (W By: By: Deputy Clerk Joseph E.Flescher,Chairman Approved by BCC: 12013. Approved: Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: -aa=J ?Jeph1tairdA,County Administrator Ala .Polackw' r.,County Attorney PIVOTAL UTILITY HOLDINGS,INC. (d/b/a FLORIDA CITY GAS) By: Name: Title: Date: (W 10 185 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST y �� NEWSPAPERS Indian River Press Journal REI��v T7 ED SCRIPPS AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CpUN OFF/C ORNEY'S STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared,Tereliz Cloud,who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Supervisor of the Indian River Press Journal,a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County,Florida:that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County,Florida,and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County,Florida,daily and distributed in Indian River County,Florida,for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person,firm or corporation any discount,rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach,Indian River County,Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ad Pub Customer Number Date Copyline PO# INDIAN RIVER CO ATTORNEY 2523770 6/8/2013 NOTICE OF INTENT 6-18-13 HEARING NEWSPAPER E-Sheet® LEGAL NOTICE ATTACHED ********************* DO NOT SEPARATE PAGES Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, June 08, 2013, by Terellz Cloud , who is ORIGINAL [X] personally known to me or [ ] who has oduced as identification. M -�ary T. Byr a Notary Public llr�r,� MARY T BYRNE = Notary Public-Stats of Ronda My Comm-Expires Aug 2.2014 •, �� Commission#EE 7134 TCPALM.COM CLASSIFIED SATURDAY,JUNE 8,2013 •SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS -F19 D�gw-7-., ORDIMNCES CNOTICE OF SALE NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF MEETING NOTICE OF MEETING 8,PETmONS _ 'Tah'c h 1Ila aNe:^•J ay P. rep wh ch b,in,at PEAL THE DECI- _.:Ak. un deralq red Ind ati d.1n bus hers 6:30 D In the SON OF THE CITY O ACROSS 38 Lamb's mama Answer to Previous Puale mbl•a t1 edsfy en s Fi.d H,Eiry Goa w CI,, He II Commie- COMMISSION AS v 9g AttemfJtad o net a^alar eianb.ro^.Mrl pea a;o cn.mber., TO THE FOREGO- Treasure 1 Heat Gager gg an pare lien of Ire is"T if.eninmrpb Co.Nonh U.S.ft, THAT A BECORC, CGdSt 42 Labor org. N A M E D C A G E R de onb•d surd ndored Reed area-1 Indian noltl e1BPuEfieI Haaar OF PROCEEDINGS Chris 45 Ernesto A 5 Azl thin UNCLE BOB'S Guevara I R I SES PALATE Ing...n APPlice- A ,SUCH INClassifieds N 12 Sighed to SELF STORAGE The Public Hearing tion forCarl C,l,,n ANY SUCH APT U) 7z Sighed loudly In that case LENT I L ERASES Iacd,, listedbaaw y J nom.n 13 at of Public Conven. PEAL AND THAT O 9 y Shaggy And,due notice day,June 18,2013 et ie a s Necessity SUCH PERSON 13 Dogpeteh AGE ADS having been given, 8:05 em.,or es Boon bmitted by John MAY NEED TO IN- MAKE Creator Shaggy to the owner of said [hereafter as the Barnum for Jaa SURE THAT A VER - a (2wda') 53 Fkhingspot BEG NEARS CUM pefo0e[Cno�Yd^ilo n.are"otn.co.nry s° 'maato°nro SATIM PflOCEEUINGSRS YOUR 14 tidied up O A R I T L L M A G I lei..n Interest CDmmiaabn Ch.m- III,240D S.mh MADE INCLUDING ADVERTISER 15 Smile widely `�Familiarize therein,end Me time bare located on the Ocean Drive li-S THE TESTIMONY 16 Cousins of y SSB food° AGA I NST D I VAS soei6ad pevmetl'm of cert of[her of couBuil R tore city of fon UPON WHICH THE DOLLARS S L I N G E V I D E N T ;i`a fb. ry "Until, n na•,ing.xpir.d, miniaa.nr.C Al: APPEAL IS TO BE WORK to!Gond,far one garnish TEND A R I A ADE the ofpdywwbe S a,teal 2ii'nAll ;mere .d BASED. 0 58 La-Bonita" sold et 0dI T - SIr..L v.ra B.,=a p,n;ea m,y pp„/ eaaaend,,Stank FOR YOU W a 19 EteaW,as with S T Y E P S O M T A D t the below.urod floritla 32960,a t i n e P I°b l°I c ciry Cie. {IBiS lot o Ire n d,time inter It- Hearin and be �EE�A V gc DOWN A B S L E A nighn[ !doer. a P,rHu trey ba heard w1threspect Publish:June 6, V C a d 23 Navy noncom o herwise eiapo,eE haaN wVoved y z io the Application. 2013 tC alm.eom Z IL 3 It >, 26 Aussie 1 Treetmnk DANUBE ETC H E R t.. Wll...day. the pre Said Application TCN2523915 P A um r 2 Killer whale 6}14.13,at 1200 P.M. Ing of a franchise. mil be available for V- 1 � E X U D E S TER E S A ,p.-ti.n in ma w„ Classified O �- 3 27 Foul callers 3 Postage 8531 S.HIGHWAY 1,Th.pro Posed}ren- city Clerk's Office, pe, >. 30 Roomy sleeve 4 Not square FET 1 D R E E S E PORT ST.LUCIE.FL Dnia<,pr.mant City Hall,100 Nonh F„,de= ,l.?. a Z C 32 Ladle 5 Old FrenchTruck3a9sx-nxa]5n91 y be in de,by U.S.FL Fort Pian, W N 7 W gs 10 ran IS 20 Planet nextm the public tluring Florida. 34"Fighting" coin 11 Ristorente Saturn Rile Mercer- H.1d eg.l I,hue In a.. TREASURE } I= C team 6 Possesses deeHert 21 ACryIIC gia55 gds,For. Boxes, hours(830 a.m.to A N Y P E R S 0 N `:..rw.wama, COAST W 35 Poch's friend 7 Hill builders Dnng gas,Tools, 8:00 p.m..Mone.;AS TO AP-R M Z 12 Inventory: brand ppbaf,Tv/stereo tb..ugh Friday) aawa.r,arae CLASSIFIED Zr - O 36 Pbarro's 8 D.C.biggle Eau; Abbr. 22 Urban blight p. the orrice of the r I.L y" Conquest 9 Bandleader clerk to Me 8.%1 or L LL' ` 37 Easel dis la -Duchin 17 MD employer 23 Demser- Torah Sime-H.le C.pntY c.mm;asi.n-ORDINANCES ORDINANCES O ,� O 24 Crab's sensor pas,Pont,Bozo ere to,,ad on the d PETITIONS i PETITIONS m rwm,aMr,. O want mor p aalmn> 25 Look 2nE poor Buileing a^� >, ChOCk out Ills•'Just R,ghi Crorswore Pux21as5"books WOHlahl Chris Ckmen III-Heb A oli thea Gunry Atl- NOTICE OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAP CHANGE W at DMHID Ve a00kaCOm y Bd`Nm,Bosea,IP- m C 28 Flag holder "lies.TVISI<no plexitr18012)Ilh Th,cityof Fallern-roPmeatoadopt*.f.1Iwirg Ordlname: a _ _ 29 Gush forth Equip sh.eL v.ra aeo=n, H 31 Trevi Fountain Lori Dory-Nsld pdz, Florida. ORDINANCE No.2013.02 fall InAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FELLSMERE,INDIAN RIVER wO /♦ A� > coma -de Boxaa,Acctng Anyone who may COUNTY.FLORIDA,AMENDING THE CITY OF FELLSMERE OFFI Ly V O 32 Most nimble rids d-Win wph,.h m°y QAL ZONING MAP TO ADD A ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PDO U 13 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR LAND HAVING A COM- ` 33 Sault-Marie Jeffery q.Wright- be made at this PREHENSIVE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF INCUS- d;,gds,Boxes, m sing will need to ad-r i5 1G 1) 18 37 Sound Of eppincea ore that.verba- TRIAL RI CONSISTING OF MEG ACRES,MORE OR LESS LOCAT- Sati9faCllon Um recd d of the ED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 512 ON LAND PREVI- N We Gnalei-Hald p ro=e e e r a GUSLY KNOWN AS MESA PARI(PROVIDING FOR RATIFICATION; Q to 1 2 40 Beat Ill R Ila PROVIDING FOR CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Q 41 Scottish Ed s.Boxes,Spring ode,whit n- AND LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE;PROVIDING FOR ZONING; O pds,.RPlnua-Fog I. ties testimony FURTHER PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;CONFLICTS;AND AN 0 23 9 2] 8 29 daggers •d evidence upon EFFECTIVE DATE, p 42"American-'r Publish:June 1,6, bcn the appeal la C 30 32 33 q3 Article Of TCN2519n3 based Tne Banning a Zoning CammisskMaeal Planning ggenry of[M1e >. commerce Anyone who needs a Ciry of Fellmere,InMan River County,Fbrida,will held•public Q Q W < 36 special ecommode- statim on tM renni g on W dna de,,J- 9,2013,b°g;n g -- Ql 44 Fancy ti.nalor Mia meet alp [6:05 D.m.,.r eh.nly Ch after.Me Dubli,heating wiu be held L E' 47 InlU t u t r t rct the M Cil,Guncil Chamber,21 S.Cypren Sheet,Felismere,FL N Q 38 3] 36 C Amari- a Public Hearings may be continuetl from time ro time. Cz a 48 Author 'NOTICE OF MEETING v o Z Q O Parets The Town of Indian With tDis.bilitin Act Th.Gry CdRiM of the City of Fellsrnan.Indian River GU ,Flori- 39 40 1 ky giver Shares'Plan- 'CA)Co.dinator et ea,will hold one DI Wblic head on the aMve triad ordinance, _ >- 49 Mantra chants naz25t223 at lain "P nn."z.nbgg a veri- 4e naur in ae.,nc, TM1untlay.July 11,21113 begmninq t zoo p.m.,..an.ny .L a 2 3 44 4b 6 / 48 H8 51 Zodiac Hon (PRI 9mrd will of Me meedn hereaner.the Dublic nearing wHl ba held in the Ciry Guncil U m 52 Motel of ore Eondac[,meetbg a cnamb.r,xt S.cYpr.aa Street,Fellamere,FL. Puhli<Hearings y Monday June me be continued he limeroume. _a) U Cl) R 50 51 52 53 54 54-Ch1 Ch'Uan I. 2013 at 2:00 INDIAN RIVER y Q V p.m.in Ma Council COUNTY BOARD OF U Q Cal 0 55 58 Chamber,6001 N. COMMISSIONEfl3 Highway AtA,Indian JOSEPH IS C River Shoran,Flori- 5) ,ft The public is;rt HAIRMAN N vnad to enend. The CHAIRMAN 02 .g ands eilebla Pub:June 8,2013 COUNTY n Town Hall,on the _ - C tL8 02013 UFS Dial.byU wenalU lick for UFS website www TCN3513n0 ' r°h%.s.c.m and an 7yRI .. 9 - our balm n board 11 ,a C a parson d.-d..to ( TO . DDeal any matter N REQUEST FON ILIO REQUEST FON BID REQUEST FOR 810. REDDEST FON BID REQUEST FOR BIO e.cllred ata I ,NOTICE OF MEETING - M d Ma x013 4r at no cost M the SEALED BID SALE the mu ba recavad on Board Hearnng,he or The Mar C y Iiif i 1- N V II g E 1-TCN1522638 Ilar. pgN.ultural end L.- r belora Wednea he will o d e r School Board h rese C4 T7 I S Mea Bid.anal)be...led bar Program Inc, day,Jun 12,x013 mrd of the pro=ved- I. le n�t an r r m 5 h I Carl p TAe d 1•arl,m,rk,1 WIII to a sealed by 4:00 .m.local n end for ouch hoc -- (h Modular Un1t remov n outs tie of[ala bid e1.of•Mod.lar time,at the office of purpaaa,he art aha Mathematic,Work at., e,,.I...on will be 1 pe Modular orlon w.Greed. the Agricultural end may need n enure shop on Tu..day, i j ol.ly h r°epona REQUEST FOR BID U S.le.All 6ida J. 12,2013,ei Lb Progaram,Inc, that•verbal m re- June 11,x(113.12:00 N x bihay of the purchae-SEALED BID SALE th M nn well on 4.00 p.m The land.- ' _O LYrnhbury Road, cord of the proceed p ,ntl Student1 ,r t no coat to the p iculturai end La- before Wednaa- ler Unit rs for ole Leke Allred,Fmr da 'ng,;:mese,wn'ch qe og on t 6.00 N r W N I'"Cl bar PC.gr m,Inc. 111,June 12.2013 !Are Ic'end conXns 3e85a.Any hies re- re Ord includes the p.m.Tnhj will be mtarene c1n ala era lnvn a c rage to,nen t e C Bida shell be...led 'll mndun a eeeled by 4:00 p.m.local 1 3 QMnd..tr9 end tl attar the slim any and.,1- In.School Board naldnes end make mmmants.Th Ciry oerk mug receive wrin4n end leer) masked time,nd the oRn of 'Ratified time will dente upon which m u nd leen 3 de s Ne LOYI Planni Age 2i O an Me ouuba of the bid ole of a Modular he Agricultural and 1 Office to inp t be canaidared. he a i is to ba Meninp Roam,500 E. Coundlnmendinge. Coplae of bforma[iea era wa0able torr publii Unit on Wall 11 3,000 square I. the ogee Oc,an Blvd.,Stuan, Ln elope:Modular Jun°tx,x013,et Labor Bogra I, un t we, a,h„d For additional in. beaeE. For•ccom- Raid,34994. �"kWi02 during normal bueiness hour st the office of the City Q Unit Sala.All bid, 4;00 pm The Mode 300 Lynchh rp Road. 11888 Tna Modukr f°!m°tion or ep dation of special Clerk,22 S.Orange Strea,Fellamere,FL between the hour o/ F mu b,received on I•,Unit I.for sal• Lake All'. loriee In ; looted t all D]zl and.,pima anted Pub:June e,2013 8:30 a.tr.,ntl Nmn and 1:00 pm.to 8W P,.In ea.rdanw wnh r before WednM- •p,la'and mnsiau 33850.Any bide °- 1702 SE L•nnatd Gki-m1 E.11. then Building Gpan- TCN252a77 he Americans with Disabilities Ad and Section 286.26 Florida N deY Jun°12,x013 t 3 Cla„room,end t v d aytar�h a gone,Pon SL Lucie, u b I i•h:J u n e Rn t an 2314453. Statute,any pert.,who may road aPW,l aaommodawa oe bm 4:00 ym local j Office to tal;n .e'fi.d II FL 34952 and Is lo- .9.10,11,12, larors far 016 mending must morn the Cby Ckrk's OR1ce n V t a et[M office of 3,OW guar ke[tin rot be Onside,aI. pub:Juna 8,2013 (n2)6456301 a lean 48 hour°;n a6 111 of Gw mending.pny 7_ Q t1 he Agricu11 end unit was purchased for etldition.l 1n- TCN2523a2 parer wM mtry w appeal eny eenion whitll trey be made Q Labor Progre ,Inc., 1998.The Modular formation or an ail- NOTICE OF INTENT NOTICE OF MEETING Mia=I; q need to amort MY a verbat'un record of the Q� Z N 300 Lynchh r Read, in 19 i located Pointmen[call p721 pDBLID HEARING CIN OF FORT pr-dings 1a mad°,which rmrd include,the[utiq- and ,Q Q 3 Lake Alfred, Wide 1]02 SE Lennaad 0852W1 EM.11, ni r• - PIERCE id._I;an whiA the appall u ID be based.GalquierI qoe cc: � Z 33850.Any bid, - Road,Pon St.Lucie,P.1,11-June aVrelocation will be NOTICE IS HEREBY NOTICE OF PUBLIC dale.au.I•,coal�uier decisin qea as puede It r an aha reu- ceived attar the Fl,34852 and;a 10- 5'6,7.8, tet x, hely Ire tyPunJ ICE OF SALE GIVEN that the HEARING 1n ala slur t r en me quo un reginro al qe ea la tetra eoacitied limo will d aQacent m tM 2013 bili;of Me porches- NOTICE OF Board of Counay The City Commie- de In eaov n hen,qu:71 a el regisM NcIWa el tendimnio y le a4 L... t be 1111idaree. Villa Green Envi-TON25a835 ere no m,to the PUBLIC AUCTION Commiaal.nara t n f the Ciry of damia wbn qua le.Dalac;n,e borer.C,.11u ere persona quo Z Q For additional In- ms tel Studien CLGN HOUSE Iter. Indian River Gunry, Fon Barco.Fbrida, puede nacaaitar los alai+miam apeclalea para sale nurin Q Q formatio^or en aP School Gmpua.The CLGN UPI Bids,hell be sealed In accordance wNh Florida,will mndutt purseam to Me Ciry dobe mmac[.r al EmPIMdo de la Gudod L71x1 5)1-0116 Per to ms .Q C0 N O O p.inarr-call 0]x1 Modular Unit rent -Seipel-G0eerr anted and cIserly marked he provision•of I PubNc Hee ri^g to CMner and Florida I-48 Mrae sal avanas ee k r•urn, V 485x831 EM.11. aIf al...lion will ba Items tluough m Ne mtslde of the State Law,there raider granting Statutae,well o Q VJ U OI PYblleh:Ju^• solely the rnpon,i- TREASURE COAST envelope:Modular b•Inyy due d franchise to Pivotal Monday,June 1], CITY OF FELLSMEILE,FL 5,8.7.8,8.10,11,12, bilRV of the purrhee- CLA591FIED Unit Sale.All bid unpaitl charges far Utility Holding,,in, 2013,at Mair in Pub:June S.2013 a Juna 29,2013 TCN251266/ 7 N e ]_ a ori M GO _ CL -H~.+ O AMGUI RNGMOOK- kEUM_ BACKHOE. CLEANING .CONCRETE GARAGE DOORS HAUUNG/rOWING UWN GRE PAINTING PRESSURECLEMIMG TILE d BOONNE M WO T•BBqACKHOE HOUSE CLEANING-ANad"pCone�tdyele MTFOa 6A 1 O11-HAYyLDYO AN Aneskan lawn xOLANO A SONS-ACH-CURIE HIM TLE INSTALL 10 00 GJ 'i-' 44 G/-01,f/�S• FIECRI y�Mvawllln9s Atlwl cll li Tnf r Onve�wsysr4etlhLDe[le penile Eow 4Yap ere He.6TrssRnC,s Free estimaha EMmiNGp nd.,gREppSyuCYI-tvwok eta uMINATF/N.WOOD, mbo.IMeepinANx Man YSpecleH .ugh Cl ngfl5/hr CEHme Cant m- resol-yynn axD IIuu-K In, BRealdentltl.UC Nit bl t fl• aaadtlla pHcmlP LIMNS IR O EG m4obou4 Ctll n2a3Ola3 pm>L15BI0 a- 3600515 ealholdi 34/I,n1-036WI IR SL Me T)?8l2•xsw stns al PM0.R Pr-;;7-,n r exYY Llectl�9yli} LIc/9u..T?501-3W1 m-559951er`A96B63 Es X'C.r HOUSE CLONING BY LGC1519S88R GMDnl1AUWN call)'ri-a'.. MnYemun L RIE M RWki, ALL CONdN E SERVME-Ern Wanlnyi PalnM9 d i eN tl DHvewflysRatios/ HOME EstlmatW Lit B Imo ,1'TEPE All EN A Freon-R at �mT tel O .PC-gtllaM G Bnckpavers/91aes Palm tnmMms P2 PAINTING aoldabk Prices. 4J C ADULT CARE CARPENTRYIIIcatT`C W a mcaM[mows HANOYPERSON IMPROVEMENTS. abTss3 stnwntc am pu.BtYnarti Aaw-u y.sa TREESERWCE E eCO1BY6 IR SL DILL IM,MEiflpm5 GABLE CARPENTRY.ROCS LANDSCAPING T1Zs m AFFproYLF TRFF 'O Huxk itlle0k Y FK Nltch eR)lab Pay Clark CannMa BFLeoDas INm.BaM, Nl pVr landuapim fwN>elM a2aann9 -,,,I O &honest refs. ^ 11 I g ham ttopW boli Patl SIWwMksa Mcn/YM,/prwall D i lff rdable needs&9nuM TNF PAm)a Immirm,removal. O •> Sp,µEnglion PSL s o 1.1 l F fs,l Orvwyv D n)999 m. i Cefrpentry]0 yr S In 108.•• mint Ressoneble }rem SrNrq®}199 Iw Orc Llc 8 m r0 fD Mea m.E6r.4E] SY#ex`LI B I TI)0&)Al SL MC W IR n2 Q3-W57 U ek TR-801 md31.87�MC SL IR Ymr PMM My bush. n3.3)64.56)IR SL MC ULaraah.� MC SL NUFP•s SENIOR royclYk m OY6 lkAlss^RrSLC TMOEWINOS eLnG �vrs eh f^ ROOFING B REPAIRS ■ e d d /Campank^ ire eat PePtlr: PUSfo•S GWN WIF 6962 Iwmu.li LaNGS SFINKES, Llc'.Criminal W-li .... ARE PVC BOBBYi B401NFtl ezwNlY ntfia OATO Cg1ARYLmON MG.hlmmimaRt >_ pYyBN P�Inadtl.Nwl 8 Fre E t C Y pY mkeLGrap- TM N agbl�a Feiiwllh"kent Yra i _.n g s Appts AnXNrq hal�i AVro�2 Tin r465.p)g}CMC A vc>] 6 5239 VaNL Pool Cmvt�F. pie tatlilticv nrewood Y7 SLSMcm ¢499 r�NNA,n"1300-0II� WMhem,BaNraaa al13-]7&$45 • CGGHl D41rr - - w, }8 /Garay CARPETING ' CONTMCTORS nmrMG Lamer . wn gc}- 014SA-8071 iwu fro FL OR COVERIN0 NIHNSON cangek �y FWlm s PERSOMLASSMMffr Pxwrs nFF A° O person ro is SPECIALIST y t moeN a repairs R pg HURMCANFJSTORM Personal Asci l t3N5N011E ROORIW savcal DSP Gemral ea Q O ymr Ion LMI I narewd vinyyl Carpentry a Lwvate tll raOH wds PROTECTION Mak Your lRe Fuia Leek R.P,k Expate Lorna-tin0.Free Es4 N> O »3.8015210. 7132.4.4..x*,, Odve- ya 3%e CV m453-0909. MEDICAL Byrs .30m torn- New R.af/Nwoflm U=Am.Remmabla 465-08}5 UNm CLOCK REPAIR MSL°lili-4353 ANYNWS ALt1YMUM y q uVlm Fan Ess XwlklyDwmlHb. e N WWILL PAY CANESa.- CLOCKS BY HOLUS mm FOUNG7 Sal meant lm MEDICAID Pd arN1tY•�erY1� nx}811505 M- ins Of EOERLI PF�SON H A Na'rAW11011 Re>tlr 8 Salm s YQYe CupaHw smIIW of dl HPm S6l-0OI-0151 SL MC IR y aj AGE 'CS HHR NOME.Gtl Same an,serWca. IMS VIII G Ben Dr. xi maV•�raP•ka .f hurl Mums ECONOMY DFNTUPES R R Oivn'Won 4u' rM4 p ail CaarylL 858 IRc12594 Call mi8ss33) req sD nae Bn0a4 F wtl talkem Parts L ky p,i -2 SEBASTIAN semcelawrten�`ly's 0 -5 L m nI-av M cYl m 335 xsm ;DRYWALL K.kA DRYWAes LL TSA2 Ik.CACYl1af - you renirs. > Ho pb tm hi .Tal-9w2nL IR PEVEGrOCK m�:womz9m UPHOLSTERY am�4 0 AIR CONDITIONING Yn� A P N1aNe R EMs 1 v s IRRIGATION 1 rnu PEr Mr FOP em i6a4 is Q - COMPUTER mr i4lsSL MC ;r. BLUE WATER MOVING STORAGE rotr 4lEGGm Y' c Ga w«H - LFII T�"B Air So,ee 1. PET CLEANING - low Yrico,hoe oL W'Low.r L.Iq ew m kemllm�r,d a req irk a_ y iRa acres. m�T"cAnPer AAA ask-TatlI wNT Irp,y pFimG NaOATM,N Macon 0.R mNl@t0. AIrWaIR�,=llic slnMfimS h�rMt�wam yr�4 p0 _ _ iPa Sella-1 CLEANING Dell,NP,p C°""` GFANYIR mal � �ISe/pM 2Z' Mmw P`-- do =aa, do I+ AAln..iwaLnnherrdt�1�r I./C 3Ram9rrouS100 15tfl saHce Is YmYis f35 on 7R-2434900 r T72-ETxr72 102 P/SL P3 6-864I IR/SLC m315A65r MCpSyL rM boas 5646fib2 IR v v RIL42&MOEJP.SL.MC Thenal-groutcl 14 Oten2415]Ba�aN.ELECTRICAL Rendye Nally Gently Ymr home. sam.mYi9wNa v ty -71E21RL R C2 DYNAYM MP nx Compubr E-Ai FI o-1. Han Ynplwwo Iob Chetk out Treason Dm't Rey V C Qk FRR Fxt1YATF5 Prabknra Far Lea No lob Tm SmNI. 4udlb work N.l.b Coast Ch-MWZ G��= Repaid Wak Ouaran- f2.395 Reek t 5 I GII ant Gen rata hook ups tm>myll DcAm. pay RMLE STNiO teed m-Rbi56T Ac sypelr�Tot Magrwst16SI999 b <1300D% nt8aaa lR LANDSCAPING aCma<teCanMo 'WALLPAPER ren Tors Tal 561.1165 Bria^m-16)-2926 m-dila sVMGR CERTIRED rIAM -rY6 It�wak40m ^^a'1^.as aw ENS B116MMG • LkmUllm]}m RSLNC,,raLMNING MTM TRAE acyl Gor RenMe HANDYMAN lawn mYrNcken eWe llklaR3tY wavrtnwn[rtrymmslRe. wallww�/0apcom brtall/npalr]nmow SEGICHIDEsq yman Sav Free OI W :MCN FROSTAK C rF"xR q�gOM�CeI Rsa�v- R.aa cwssM.d B'��u en°waNting. Uewln•m35roii9es PAINRNB EH.Si dcK549u«Sam IIS y d/ RVYMNO A a01AR La ala r,w mows a Saks�c ns Frog Eat uc a Imus DON TxIEFR9NN1f " f-1 'weans tbmak. yrs. nn rot Uc Iry .L• Nab9 P YIYn9' Tr}-23519 meAh -SBM ArmM fm)4Filn1 SL LAIIaGNPE PLYn4 0FGa Estlmak5 i- Rr.swin Cam Call m6n/IfiR AS FM Name CACIB�R25 DER881F'f DO-RIGHT ad•"'�6ne1 wMwiS'YE Ik SP01m1 .PLUMPING SCREENING m LF NINg-Oe- °�`r�+yy spOlq wWM,m Nlelatlyp Flp�jy n24B5'3AS UCC-P CPASTLL LLYMIMYM W� EDWM ISr KIOMTY PC FILL OMIT M�r�,y-IT FUK IIA aka 8 RpN Deneable Cleaning Fast D N�Tt(S d M"d°ws' Tumefy ST5g pa OyAlBry rANT616 Fyr prW 9)da wk repair I YCI V81M 80aor a Afr.rdablaRpneas iREE A9MLLT YaMNO dppn,Eta nn est iipin,F,call Marc By;p,Kap m If tum ro f I all I s Iber- n1453A0 gI. Paltllas a RaOHra ININ.PO9ClMM5f Ty}-16DOin MC CFCI42882 y G GAL - GBL AO __ (Tin 48OI1185L � NYea 800-3L]a6 MI Gh m �Td_C° CI tl /full cNalwdmea n •.snvrna i1NE OEfAN CIFAINMC k5)LR69 atmq W®PULLNQ No lo.Mo ame6 Syty Eyt ANmNnm O.P.sit°homes tee 'RE 24 V, p M Sab, UnCl-TM sarb.611.Muse Xnps. ww<oraeW M IYndma kebll N'E 00 n AlL anne Speen tors our. m3)59349W IR M r4wakexr•ee „•rol'In,vta^,�6i oRamll pores,eralraappee.. s�i .inw�'RE HrewCflra.�l 772-486-5976 Trolan wase shone:,rescreemrro AaralDn lr neasan s.uV mew^Meenwen .fp Ha•.abarAwr dom huck/be<Moe .•..,»n,,.iw._..., ^ SPOI013aIc SL Cladlhn,2sfarcaner alrrre l9]6 m-I61- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA PUBLIC CE [INFORMATIONAL] (W MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator DEP ENT HEAD CONCURRENCE: �a.zx-1 x/01, Robert . Keating, AICP; ommun' Development Director i� THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Planning Director FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP, Senior Planner DATE: June 4, 2013 SUBJECT: Notice of Scheduled Public Hearing for Upcoming Board Meeting It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of June 18, 2013. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Please be advised that the following public hearing item has been scheduled for Board consideration: July 2, 2013 1. KTLC TD 1,LLC's Request for Abandonment of a 20' Alleyway Running from 42nd Place South to 42nd Street and Lying Behind Lots 1-10 of the J. T. Gray's Town of Gifford Subdivision [2013040006-70650/ROWA-13-07-01] [Legislative] RECOMMENDATION: The above referenced public hearing item is provided for the Board's information. No action is needed at this time. Indian River Co. Aiwoved Dale APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Admin. Legal - 3 FOR: Budget G to Dept. BY: Risk Mgr. (W FACommunity Development\CurDev\public hearings\BCC\2013\6-18-13 public hearing notice to board.doc 1 186 Departmental Matters Indian River County Inter-Office Memorandum Office of Management and Budget TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 11, 2013 SUBJECT: Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds, Series 2001 Consideration of Partial Early Payo FROM: Jason E. Brown Director, Management & Budget Background The Series 2001 Bonds were issued to provide funds to finance a portion of the cost of acquisition and expansion of the Dodgertown spring training facility. Indian River County entered into an agreement with the City of Vero Beach and the Los Angeles Dodgers to acquire, renovate and expand this facility. The Series 2001 Bonds are secured by a first lien upon and pledge of (i) State payments awarded to the County for the purpose of paying for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or renovation of a facility for a retained spring training franchise pursuant to Chapter 212.20, F.S. ($500,000 per year), (ii) Fourth Cent Tourist Development Tax adopted in 2000 for this purpose, and (iii) Eighty-six percent (86%) of the Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax distributed to the County pursuant to Chapter 218, Florida Statutes. The Fourth Cent Tourist Development Tax and the Half-Cent Sales Tax will automatically be released as pledged revenues immediately following the April 1, 2021 principal payment. From that point forward until final maturity, the bonds will be secured solely by the State Payments. Analysis Debt service payments for this bond issue are currently a little over $1.2 million per year. After 2021, the annual debt service is reduced to $500,000 per year, as the pledge on the Half-Cent Sales Tax and on the Fourth Cent Tourist Development Tax is released at this time. Please see the chart below for a breakdown of the annual debt service by funding source. FY 2012/13 Funding Source Budget Half-Cent Sales Tax $383,473 Fourth Cent Tourist Development Tax $406,667 State Payments $500,000 (W Total —All Sources $1,290,140 187 Board of Commissioners Page 2 of 3 (W June 11, 2013 The bonds are currently callable at par value. Staff has prepared an analysis exploring a partial payoff of the remaining Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds, Series 2001 outstanding. Based upon this analysis, the prepayment of $2,275,000 of the remaining $10,420,000 currently outstanding would eliminate the need to utilize Half-Cent Sales Tax revenues to make the annual debt service payments. The remaining $8,145,000 would be serviced by the $500,000 annual State payments and the Fourth Cent Tourist Development Tax. This early payoff would provide three main benefits as detailed below: 1. Reduction of Interest Expenses - The bonds to be paid off carry an interest (coupon) rate of 5.25% per year. This substantially exceeds the current interest earnings on surplus funds held by the County. Staff proposes the use of General Fund reserves to pay down this debt. Reserves are currently available in the General Fund to retire this debt, which is an appropriate use of fund balance. The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) best practices include early retirement of debt as an appropriate use of fund balance. This use of fund balance is preferred to the use of fund balance to fund ongoing operations, which is not recommended. Additionally, a one-time expenditure of fund balance is in accordance with the County's Fund Balance and Reserve policy. 2. Revenue Stream for Capital Reserve Account — On June 4, 2013, the Board of Commissioners approved the Third Amendment to the Facility Lease Agreement for Vero Beach Sports Village. In this agreement, the County has committed to contribute $250,000 per year to the Capital Reserve Account to be used for construction, reconstruction, improvements, repairs and replacements at the facility. One Cent Sales Tax will provide $125,000 per year towards this fund. Staff proposes the use of $125,000 from Half-Cent Sales Tax to provide the remainder of this annual commitment. This early payoff will eliminate the need to use approximately $380,000 per year from Half-Cent Sales Tax to service the outstanding debt. 3. Additional Revenue Available for General Fund Operations — As shown above, the early payoff of these bonds would make approximately $380,000 additional Half-Cent Sales Tax revenue available each year. After providing $125,000 for the Capital Reserve Account commitment, approximately $255,000 will be available to fund General Fund operations. This funding will reduce pressure on Ad Valorem Taxes for the provision of general governmental services beginning in fiscal year 2013/14, and would provide a savings for County taxpayers. Staff has considered the opportunity cost of this decision as well. Interest earnings on any funds used to pay down the debt would be lost. However, the County is currently earning about 0.50% interest on the overall investment portfolio (0.53% last quarter). The remaining bonds outstanding carry an average interest rate of about 5.25% per year. Even considering the potential of higher interest rates in future years, the County is holding funds earning a relatively low interest rate, while paying a comparatively higher rate on the outstanding bonds. Please see the table below for an estimate of the net savings that could be realized from the partial early retirement of this debt. For purposes of this analysis, staff has assumed an average interest rate of 2.00% on County investments over the period (W to account for a potential rise in interest rates. 188 Board of Commissioners Page 3 of 3 (W June 11, 2013 Interest Investment Principal Payment Interest Net Savings/ Year Payment Due (Savings) Earnings (Loss) (Loss) 2014 $240,000 $119,438 ($45,500) $73,938 2015 $255,000 $106,838 ($40,700) $66,138 2016 $265,000 $93,450 ($35,600) $57,850 2017 $275,000 $79,538 ($30,300) $49,238 2018 $290,000 $65,100 ($24,800) $40,300 2019 $305,000 $49,875 ($19,000) $30,875 2020 $315,000 $33,863 ($12,900) $20,963 2021 $330,000 $17,325 ($6,600) $10,7425 Totals $2,275,000 $565,427 ($215,400) $350,027 As shown in the table above, the early payoff provides a net savings of$350,027 for the County, and in turn the taxpayers. The county would forego $215,400 in interest earnings on the $2.3 million used to (W pay down the debt over the eight-year period. However, the County would no longer pay the interest on these bonds, which totals $565,427 over the same period. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners authorize staff to begin the process of calling $2,275,000 out of the $10,420,000 remaining of the Spring Training Facility Revenue Bonds, Series 2001 on or before October 1, 2013. Staff further recommends that the Board authorize a budget amendment to allocate funding for this transaction from General Fund Cash Forward. APPROVED AGENDA ITEM: Indian River County Approved Date Administrator (1�> 411-03 BY. County Attorney tCJoousep ep A. Baird County Administrator Budget 6 11 FOR: June 18, 2013 Department Risk Management L 189 1-1 INDI �� AN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator THROUGH: Christopher R. Mora, P. Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray,Jr. @Coastal Engineer SUBJECT: Department Of The Army Right-Of-Entry Agreement—Round Island Beach Park For Environmental Assessment and Response DATE: June 6, 2013 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The subject of this agenda item is a Right-Of-Entry Agreement between Indian River County and the Department Of The Army for the temporary use of Round Island Beach Park in the event that objects known as Horned Scullies are found offshore during the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) debris removal action under the Defense Environmental Restoration Program for Formerly Used Defense Sites (DERP FUDS). Horned Scullies were obstacles intended to damage landing craft and were specifically used during World War II. The USACE will search approximately 10 miles of ocean near the shore in Indian River County and St. Lucie County. For Indian River County the offshore search site extends from approximately 17th Street south to the St. Lucie County line. The USACE contractors intend to remove all identified under water obstacles onto an offshore barge. However, in the event that an obstacle cannot be removed using a barge, the USACE requests use of the County owned, Round Island Beach Park. If Round Island Beach Park is to be used, the Contractor for USACE will be responsible for all site restoration to the beach park and has named Indian River County as an additional insured on their Certificate of Insurance. The USACE has provided Fact Sheets relative to the DERP FUDS investigation and are attached to this agenda item for the Board's review. The USACE will also be presenting a short presentation on the project during the regularly scheduled Board of County Commissioners meeting on June 18, 2013. (W R\Public WorksUamesG\iorned Skelly Removal 2013\Agenda Item- Right of Entry Agreement\agenda item—Right of Entry Agreement USCOE—64-13.&cx 190 Page 2 BCC Agenda Item—Right-of-Entry Agreement June 18,2013 FUNDING Funding is not required for the execution of the Right-of-Entry Agreement between Indian River County and the Department Of The Army. RECOMMENDATION The recommendation of staff is for the Board to approve the attached Right-Of-Entry Agreement between Indian River County and the Department of the Army and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENT Right-Of-Entry Agreement(2 original copies) APPROVED AGENDA ITEM Indian River County Approved Date (W Administration V,�3/3 FOR: June 18,2013 Budget 10 13 V. 1U•C '.� Legal 1p 3 Public Works Coastal Eng. Division J G 1616115 F:Tublic WorksUamesGAHorned Skully Removal 2013Wgenda Item- Right of Entry Agreementlagenda item—Right of Entry Agreement USCOE--6-4-13.docx 191 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES Forfe • •l Amphibious Tr• • Base 1 1 MAY 2013 1IJI 1 I1p1 DI�jRISlt , DEFE E7,SITBS (FU-DSS) . Across the country,a he Department of.Defense(DoD)"acquired properries,often during times of war,to use for military training,testing and demonstrations. When"no longer needed,many of these properties were:cleaned up according to the best"practices available at the time arid""then transferred to other owners such;as private.individuals or other government entities. These Formerly Used Defense Sites(FUDS)°canrange from privately-owned farms to ,tional Parks. They also include residential,industrial and educational properties. DoD is committed to protecting an health and the`environment and improv-mg-p c"safety,by cleaning iip"these properties.The Defense Envi- ronmental Restoration Program for Formerly Used Defense Sites(DW-FUDS)was established to evaluate and if necessary,to remediate FURS. The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USAGE)manages the FUDS program on behalf of DOD. Congress passed the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act(CERCLA),also known as Superfund;-in 1980 and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization-Act(SARA)in"1986' Itis this law that gives DoD.the authority for certain cleanup activities at FUDS and dictates the process USAGE mustfollow. USACE conducts investigations to determine the potential risk to human health and the environment from contami- nation resulting from the military's use of the property. Public involvement and community participation are impor tant components of the process. USACE partners with stakeholders throughout the process,,including congressional representatives,state and local regulatory and environmental agencies and affected property`awners BACKGROUND The Fort Pierce Naval Amphibious Training Base was around 19,280 acres. It ex- tended approximately 25 miles from near Vero Beach to near Jensen Beach and include North and South Hutchinson Islands. The military acquired the site during World War II for the Navy to create a training facility. The Navy constructed more than 450 buildings and other improvements such as roads and water and sewer systems. By January 1943,detachments of Scouts and Raiders began arriving. The base fulfilled two primary missions during World War 11. Its original mission was amphibious training,including training for Naval Underwater Demolition Teams. C phibious training missions included use of high explosive rockets,bombs,anti-air- t guns and small arms. During 1943,the Joint Army-Navy Experimental and Test- ing Board was established to develop and test procedures for breaching and removing Placing Explosives on a Beach beach fortifications expected to be encountered in Europe and Japan. Beaches were Obstacle FORMERLY •rt Pierce Naval Amphibious • • Base fo ' 'ed along the northern portion of the base,and a variety of ordnance was tested against these fortifications. 1946,the site was no longer needed,and the land was returned to the original owners. Much of the area compris- ing the former base has been developed and includes residential,commercial,governmental and educational facilities. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS The US Army Corps of Engineers has conducted a number of investigations of the site to determine if anything from the military's training remains. The Corps is now searching for objects known as horned scullies. A horned scully is an obstacle intended to damage landing craft. They are usually made of steel beams welded together and placed in concrete. In order to train the Underwater Demolition Teams(the pre- decessor to the Navy Seals),the Navy erected the types of objects the men would encounter so they could learn how to destroy them. Some of these structures have already been removed;-however,it is likely that more still remain. Technology and funding are now available to conduct a thorough underwater investigation in the areas where the teams trained. The Corps will search approximately 10 miles of ocean near the shore in Indian River County and St. Lucie County. In Indian River County,it ex- tends froin.near 17th Street south to the St.Lucie County line. In St.Lucie goat with Underwater Metal Detectors County,it extends from the Indian River County line south to near Shore- winds Drive.The work will not impact the beach or recreational activities,and the teams will avoid protected species. The team will use underwater metal detectors attached to a boat to scan the ocean floor from the shoreline out from the beach until they reach a depth of 10 feet. Based on the data from the metal detection, divers will visually investigate the area to determine what the metallic object is. They will remove the horned scullies from a barge with a large piece of equipment that will hoist the horned scullies out of the water and onto the barge. There is the possibility that explosive materials used in the training exercises may be on the horned scullies. Trained ordnance technicians are doing the work,and should they find explosives,they will follow the appropriate protocol to destroy the materials. Barge with Winch The work will begin in late spring 2013 and should be complete by the end of the year. SAFETY FIRST: Remember the 3Rs Because of how the military used the site,munitions may remain on and around the site. Munitions may be dangerous and may not be easily recognizable. Never touch,move or disturb something you think may be a munition. Remember the 3Rs. The item you found could be dangerous.Mmmff-Do not touch it in any way,and leave the area. IMF=-Call 911 immediately. 0 Recognize 0 Qetreat 0 Report FOR O. • . • 7Y } 1 i FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES FortPierce Naval • • • • • Base � u MAY 2013 1 1 Question: Where will you be working? Answer: We will be searching approximately 10 miles of ocean near the shore in Indian River County and St.Lucie County. In Indian River County,it extends from near 17th Street south to the St.Lucie County line. In St.Lucie County,it extends from the Indian River County line south to near Shorewinds Drive. Question: What will I see from the beach? Answer: You may see a boat with special equipment attached when the crews are looking f or the horned scullies. When crews are removing )rned scullies and other similar obstacles,you may see a barge with a large piece of equipment that will hoist the horned scullies out of t water and onto the barge. Question: What is a horned scully and why are they here? Answer: A horned scally is an obstacle intended to damage landing. They are usually made of steel beams welded together and placed in concrete. During World War II,the military established the Fort Pierce Naval Amphibious Base. It comprised more than 19,000 acres and extended about 25 miles f rom Vero Beach to Jensen Beach During 1943,the Joint Army-Navy Experimental and Testing Board was estab- lished to develop and test procedures for breaching and removing beach fortifications and obstacle expected to be encountered in Europe and Japan Question: Why are they still here? Answer: The LIS Army Corps of Engineers and other organizations have removed horned scullies over the years;however,it is thought that more may still remain The technology and funding are now available to do a systematic search for any remaining obstacles. Question: Why are you removing them? Answer. The horned scullies could damage boats and potentially injure swimmers and surfers. Question: Will you remove them if they have become a habitat for protected species? Answer: The contractors doing the work will use underwater cameras to record the condition of the horned scullies. The Corps,in consul- tation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and other agencies,will evaluate the benefit of leaving the horned scully versus the potential risk to people and the environment if it is left in place. Question: Will you close down the beach or impact swimming/surfing? Answer: The work is being conducted off-shore,and it will not impact the beaches or recreational activities. Question: How will this impact bird and turtle nests? ver: Since crews will not be working on the beach,it will not impact any nests. estion. How will you ensure the marine creatures and habitats are not damaged? Answer: The contractor is aware of the potentialfor encountering protected species in addition to a wide variety of marine life. The metal 4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES I FortPierce NavalAmphibious Tr• • Base -tors will not come in contact with the seafloor,low boat speeds will be maintained,and the team will only anchor in sandy areas. They %Wnakeeve-ty effort to avoid contact with protected species and will follow the Standard Operating Procedure for Underwater Operations in Marine Habitat Area Question: What will you do if you find explosives? Answer: There is the possibility that explosive materials used in the training exercises may be on the horned scullies. Trained ordnance tech- nicians are doing the worn,and should they find explosives,they will follow the appropriate protocol to destroy the materials. Question: How do you know where to look? Answer: Based on historical records and previous removals,the Corps knows thegeneral areas where training took place. The contractor will use underwater metal detectors attached to a boat to scan the ocean floor from the shoreline out from the beach until they reach a depth of 10 feet. Based on the data from the metal detection,divers will visually investigate the area to determine what the metallic object is. Question: How will you remove them? Answer: The team will attempt to remove any horned scullies from a barge in the water. They will attach chains to the horned scully and hoist it out of the water onto the barge. Question: What are you going to do with the horned scullies you remove? Answer: The Corps will offer them to the UDT-Seal Museum. If the museum does not want them,they will be sent to an approved landfill or recycling facility: Question: How long will it take to do the work? Answer: The work will be completed inphases. The metal detection phase will take approximately 30 days. The length of the removal phase will be dictated by the number of obstacles located There will be a break in the fieldwork between the metal detection and the removal work. Question: When are you going to be doing this work? er: The metal detection should begin in May. The removals will probably begin in the summer. SAFETY FIRST: Remember the Us Because of how the military used the site,there could potentially be buried munitions. These could be dangerous and may not be easily recognizable. Never touch,move or disturb something you think may be a munition. Remember the 3Rs. �ppom-The item you found could be dangerous.3waff-Do not touch it in any way,and leave the area. fit-Call 911 immediately. •11ecogniie O Qetreat 01:eport FOR MORE INFORMATION DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY RIGHT-OF-ENTRY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE fense Environmental Restoration Program, Site No. 104FLO698 Fort Pierce Naval Amphibious Training Base, Indian River County, Florida Project, installation or Activity Tract Number or Other Property Identification) The undersigned, hereinafter called the "Owner", in consideration for the mutual benefits of the work described below, hereby grants the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, hereinafter called the "Government", a right-of-entry upon the following terms and conditions. 1. The Owner hereby grants to the Government the right to enter in, on, over and across the land described below, for use by the United States, its representatives, agents, contractors, and assigns, as a work area for environmental investigation and response. The work to be performed by the Government includes surveying with a metal detector or other instrument for evidence of the presence of horned scuilies and other similar objects, digital geophysical mapping of metal anomalies, removal of selected objects, creation of exclusion zones during the performance of the work, and obtaining environmental samples. Said right of entry shall remain in effect until the completion of this work or by December 31, 2013,whichever is first, at which time it will expire automatically. 2. All tools, equipment, and other property taken upon and placed upon the land by the Government shall remain the property of the Government and shall be removed by the Government upon completion of this work. The County shall designate the location of any equipment to be stored on site at Round Island Park. 3. If any action of the Government's employees or agents in the exercise of this right-of-entry results in damage to the real property or personal property, the Government will, in its sole discretion, either repair such damage or make an appropriate settlement with the Owner. In no event shall such repair or settlement exceed the fair market value of the fee title to the real property at the time immediately preceding such damage. The Government's liability under this rlause is subject to the availability of appropriations for such payment, and nothing contained in this agreement may be lsidered as implying that Congress will at a later date appropriate funds sufficient to meet deficiencies. The revisions of this clause are without prejudice to any rights the Owner may have to make a claim under applicable laws for any damages other than those provided herein. Funding for this phase of work has already been secured and awarded to the contractor. 4. The land affected by this right-of-entry is located in Indian River County, Florida and is described as follows: Approximately 5.5 miles of beach and underwater areas near the shore from the St. Lucie County line north to 17`h Street,as shown in Exhibit A. This includes Round Island Park which may be utilized for beach access. 5. Except in the case of emergency,the Government must obtain the consent of the Owner before closing Round Island Park or any dune crossovers. 6. Any of the Government's agents, contractors, and assigns shall list the Owner as an additional insured on all policies of insurance required by any agreement with the Government. The evidence of insurance shall be forwarded to the Owner prior to any agents,contractors, and assigns beginning their work on the property. 7. The Government and its agents, contractors, and assigns shall comply with all local, state and federal laws, codes, rules and regulations including turtle nesting. (W 196 Signed this n day of She 2013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA By: Mark E. Bennett Chief Management and Disposal Real Estate Contracting Officer OWNER(S) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Executed this day of 213 By: Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R.Smith,Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: (Seal)Deputy Clerk Approved: By: 10 T A. B 'rd,County Administrator Approved as to form and Ipgl sufficiency: By: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Page 2 of 3 197 fi �t Exhibit A Legend - t CountyBoundaries- - Survey Area-S 607 g�Sy�.q.�' Ear•. `.f:� L.':'d (W Page 3 of 3 198 t v ins z" __._ il.:a <.,.:.ii:i• .. .. _--�. -.�.'`'_ 1 "�.it+__-_.._- __- - Authorization &Appropriation G /�-►�p 40 Fort Pierce Naval Amphibious Training Base Horned Scu//y Removal Indian River County, Florida i yay: L. June 18, 2013 61 h Agenda ■ Brief Site History ■ Approach ■ Schedule : ■ Discussion Authorization &Appropriation History ■ Approximately 19,280 acres from near Vero Beach almost to Jensen Beach ■ Used for Amphibious Training and Joint Army-Navy Experimental and Testing Board n � 1 � I 4 Pro'ect Boundaries Legend 0��'n SL;efrtl8f,RE a. i ] J 3,_,,,,,J Surrey Area 5Ma:�ne W IO ft tleplh Authorization &Appropriation Project Location (Indian River) . „mss 31 31 N 9 25 r�7, aC 4- 4: Ys r..•r 's't i ,. r K cru if 8 2A :°a9 Y 32 4520 f'd' 7 Lbusa�r:nv,u?'v' :sv C:s -3 4 FC 6 S S?9 27 c4 , 4? tawkxn v ra 27 Oslo �4 d g 27 is' 42 Fi 2P IV 4t i Y < i t 3G « ; L #ra s Feed be1b. j43 a IuiiianRifcrC'ounty Legend uCie C'ounh' Cokfy Bonca�;es ' 0 r 9..ii 1 a n '44 ".S id....,s�m'r,>snorrnw tc rt eepsn ` 38 ; a Previous Activities ■ 1952 - Horned Scully Search (5 Removed, 10 More Located) ■ 1957 - Dynamite, Blasting Caps and Bomb Found ■ 1991 - Inventory Project Report ■ 1991 - Horned Scully Removal (200) ■ 1994 - Archives Search Report ■ 1994 Side Scan Sonar Investigation and Hydrographic Survey � 3 3 /19P Authorization &Appropriation Previous Activities (Continued) ■ 1995 - Site Investigation for Horned Scully Demolition and Removal ■ 1996 Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis ■ 1998 - Mapping and Ordnance Investigation ■ 1998 - Beach Barrier Removal ■ 2004 - Archive Search Report Supplement g X+ 0 Project Purpose ■ Locate and Remove Horned Scullies and/or Similar Offshore Barriers ; ■ Searching Specific Areas: Engineer Board Facility Area • Engineer Board Operations Areas 1-6 • Naval Demolition Research Unit Operations Area Naval Combat Unit Operations Area 6 d Xtl 4 y Authorization &Appropriation Approach Location/Identification/Verification: ■ Underwater Metal Detection (Geophysical Survey) ■ Remotely Operated Vehicle/Diver Verification of Selected Metallic Objects ■ Remove Selected Ob'ects mas; Approach Underwater Obstacle Removal ■ Vessel-Based Recovery ■ Shore-Based Recovery ■ follow-On Actions a� s,,arx i ��'/iji a :. ,fir Sri ry i 5 Authorization &Appropriation Approach Munitions Disposal (If Required) ■ Follow Pre-Defined/Approved Plan (Explosive Safety Submission) ■ Evaluate Items ■ Destroy Munitions by Detonation or Other Approved Methods in Coordination with Stakeholders Approach Threatened and/or Endangered Species Protection Methods: ■ Avoid Nesting Seasons ■ Limit Boat Speed ■ 25-Foot Approach Area 4 ■ Coordinate with Stakeholders ■ Identify and Verify Habitat(s) to Avoid When Possible 6 Authorization &Appropriation Schedule ■ Finalize Work Plan - Complete ■ Field Work - Metal Detection Began June 3 ■ Coordination Meeting Prior to Diving/Digging - To Be Determined ■ Report - Winter 2013-2014 More Information FUDS Hotline: ya Toll Free: 877.336.1274 . Email: FU DS.Florida @usace.army.miI 7 /9� � INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA ITEM (W Department of Public Works Division of Facilities Management Date: June 11, 2013 DEPARTMENTAL To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Through: k Christopher R. Mora, P.E., Public Works Direct From: Lynn Williams, Facilities Manager/Project Manager 4" Subject: Crime Scene Facility Change Order #2 Pro r Co truction Company Evidence Compound BACKGROUND: An agreement with Proctor Construction Company (Proctor) to construct the IRC Crime Scene Facility located at 3885 41 st Street was approved by the Board on December 18, 2012. The original contract amount was for$1,299,317.00. Included within the contract amount is an owner contingency line item in the amount of$50,000.00. The contingency was established due to the uncertainty of renovating an existing structure and possible unforeseen conditions with existing underground facilities. Change Order#1 was approved April 23, 2013 (item 8J) with no change to the contract amount. The attached Change Order#2 is proposed to add an evidence compound (covered) building for the storage of impounded evidence. The proposed compound, including related site work, is currently under design (design work order approved by Board June 4, 2013) and will be located adjacent to the Crime Scene Facility .The proposed construction will impact ongoing underground utilities and site work of the Crime Scene project. In order to minimize the impact and avoid delays to the Crime Scene Facility project, staff requested that Proctor provide a proposal for construction of the compound based on a schematic design parameters provided by Sheriff's Department staff and Donadio and Associates, Architect, P.A. (Donadio). During the needs analysis and master planning stage, relocation of the existing outdoor evidence storage compound was identified as a part of the project. However, the estimated cost for reuse of the buildings during the needs analysis exceeded the budget and the compound did not remain a part of the project. Since we received very favorable bids ($1.299 million)for the work and the evidence compound remained as an identified yet unmet need, staff requested Proctor prepare a proposal for construction of the evidence storage compound. Donadio has reviewed the proposal and agrees that the proposal is fair and reasonable based on the project schematic form. (Letter attached) The proposal establishes a Guaranteed Maximum price for the work, including listed assumptions and clarifications of the proposal. The final design (Donadio)will be completed with this amount in mind. The proposal also includes a construction contingency of 5% or $20,728.00, which will be returned if not needed during construction. Permit, impact and utility (W fees will be the responsibility of the County. FAPublic Works\Luanne M\Facilities Management\Sheriff Storage-New Bldg&Future Facility\Change order#2 1 Proctor Construction crime scene 06-12-13.doc 199 Page Two Agenda Item for June 18, 2013 Crime Scene Facility Change Order# 2 Proctor Construction Company Le Evidence Compound FUNDING: Funding for this phase of the project is available in Impact Fees/Public Bldg/Crime Scene Unit Bldg Renovation $146,385.00 (Acct # 10312113-066510-01004), and Optional Sales Tax $352,730.00 (Acct# 31522019-066510-01004). For FY 12/13, total funding in the amount of $2,647,376.00 has been budgeted for the Crime Scene Unit Project with $1,416,705.00 encumbered or expended year to date. Under the county's code, all funds collected from public building impact fees shall be used for the purpose of capital improvements to public building facilities under the jurisdiction of the county and not for maintenance or operations. Such acquisitions and improvements shall be those which are necessary to accommodate new growth and development in the county. Approval of Change Order# 2 in the amount of $499,115 will increase the contract amount to $1,798,432.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Change Order # 2 to the Crime Scene Facility contract with Proctor Construction Company in the amount of $499,115.00 with funding as (W detailed above and authorize the Chairman to execute the document, subject to an agreement which is acceptable to the County Attorney's office. Approved Agenda Item Indian River Co. Approved Date For: June 18, 2013 Administration County Attorney By: CA, A Budget 6 Department L FAPublic Works\Luanne M\Facilities Management\Sheriff Storage-New Bldg&Future Facility\Change order#2 2 0 0 Proctor Construction crime scene 06-12-13.doc r _ LW D O N A D I O &Associates,Architects, P.A. June 11, 2013 Mr. Lynn Williams Indian River County Buildings and Grounds 4305A 43rd Avenue Vero Beach,Florida 32967 RE: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT EVIDENCE VEHICLE STORAGE COMPOUND ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO.2013.004.1.2 (W Dear Mr. Williams, I have reviewed the proposed estimated construction cost provided by Proctor Construction for the 11,000 sq. ft. covered Evidence Vehicle Storage Compound and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this estimated cost is fair and reasonable based on the project as we currently know it in schematic form. Please feel free to contact my Office if you have any questions. Sincerely araxo*7 P. 1%*WW1fi0 Anthony J. Donadio AIA,NCARB, USGBC President Cc: File (W 0 609 17"`Street Vero Beach,Florida 32960 Phone 772 794 2929 Fax 772 562 8600 License No.AA0002238 NCM FR merlc..IWgw. i A lmNrt.. 201 EDProctor constmcuonCo. Prime Contract Change Order 2050 US-1,Suite 200 (W Vero Beach,Florida 32960 Detailed,Grouped by Each Number Teledtone:(772)234-8164 Fax:(172)234-8188 Indian River Crime Scene Investigation Facility Project# IRC-CSI01/2013 Proctor Construction Co. 3885 41st Street Tel: 772.234.8164 Fax: 772.234.8188 Vero Beach,Florida 32960 Date: 6/12/2013 To Contractor: Architect's Project No: Proctor Construction Co. Contract Date: 1/4/2013 2050 Hwy US-1 Suite 200 Contract Number: CSI-028 Vero Beach,FL 32960 Change Order Number: 002 The Contract Is hereby revised by the following items: IRCSO-Vehicle Storage PCO Description Amount CSI-014 IRCSO-Vehicle Storage Facility 499,115.00 The original Contract Value was....................................................................................................................... 1,299,317.00 Sum of changes by prior Prime Contract Change Orders................................................................................ 0.00 The Contract Value prior to this Prime Contract Change Order was................................................................ 1,299,317.00 The Contract Value will be changed by this Prime Contract Change Order in the amount of.......................... 499,115.00 The new Contract Value including this Prime Contract Change Order will be.................................................. 1,798,432.00 The Contract duration will be changed by........................................................................................................ TBD The revised Substantial Completion date as of this Prime Contract Change Order is..................................... TBD Donadio&Associates,Architects Proctor Construction Co. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR OWNER 609 17th Street 2050 Hwy US-1 Suite 200 1801 27th Street Vero Beach,FL 32960 Vero Beach,FL 32960 Vero Beach,FL 32960 Address Address Address By Anthony Donadio By Donald Tolliver By Lynn Williams SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE DATE DATE DATE APPROVED AS TO FORM AND L SUFF CiE Y BY WILLIAM K.DEBRAAC DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY (W Prolog Manager Printed on: 6/12/2013 Prolog Main Office Page 1 202 o Proctor Area Construction Co. (W (GSF) GMP Estimate 11,000 IRC Crime Scene Vehicle Storage Cost Cost/Sq.Ft. Sitework-Landscaping(Allowance) 14,06.8 1.28 Sitework Irrigation(Allowance) 4,000 0.36 Sitework-BuildingPad 1 13,000 1.18 Sitework-Cut Fill and Grade 1 37,000 3.36 Sitework-Stonn Drainage&Structures 21,650 1.97 Sitework- 100LF 1"Poly,Tie to Existing 950 0.09 Site Paving-8"Stabilization 5,900 0.54 Site Paving-6"Coquina Rock 10,925 0.99 Site Paving- 1.5" S-I Asphalt 19,320 1.76 Suveying 2,200 0.20 Chain-Link Fencing 17,529 1.59 Concrete(Slab Dimension 80'x125') 72,900 6.63 Masonry N/A N/A Metal-Bollard(Allowance) 3,500 0.32 Metal Building 80 x 125 133,016 N/A Rough Carpentry N/A N/A Cabinetry and Finish Carpentry N/A N/A Roofing in Metal Building in Metal Building (W Exterior Doors and Roll-up 6,410 N/A Drywall N/A N/A Acoustical Ceiling Tile N/A N/A Flooring N/A N/A Final Cleaning N/A N/A Toilet Accessories&Specialities N/A N/A Plumbing(Allowance) N/A N/A Fire Protection 31,000 N/A HVAC(Allowance) 4,000 N/A Electrical(Allowance) 17,200 1.56 Subtotal Direct Cost 414,568 37.69 Construction/Design Contingency(51/6) 20,728 NIC Permit Fees NIC NIC General Conditions 33,165 3.02 Builder's Risk NIC NIC GLI Auto Insurance 2,695 0.24 P&P Bond 4,192 0.38 Subtotal 475,348 43.21 Fee 23,767 2.16 Total Cost 499,115 45.37 (W 203 Exhibit T"Assumptions and Clarifications (W o Proctor Construction co. IRC Sheriff Department Vehicle Storage Assumptions and Clarifications May 17,2413 General 1 We include a payment&performance bond. 2 We do NOT include building permit fees. 3 We do NOT include Builder's Risk Insurance and deductibles are to be paid by the Owner. 4 The Owner agrees to provide Builder's Risk Insurance to be in effect from the Date of Commencement until final Certificate Of Occupancy. Proctor Construction Company shall also be listed as a named insured in (W the Owner's Builder's Risk Policy. 5 We do NOT include impact fees or utility fees or charges,offsite connections,sewer connection fees,water tap fees,water meters or water meter fees that may be required by local,state, or federal authorities having jurisdiction. 6 We do NOT include any governmental fees of any kind. 7 We do NOT include hazardous materials inspection,testing,removals or abatement. 8 We do NOT include Material Testing of any kind including the services of an independent testing agency for testing concrete, soil compaction, grouting, steel construction, etc. 9 We do NOT include any primary service it has been assumed that this will be part of FPVs scope of work. We do NOT include the transformer or installation of the transformer or the transformer pad; it has been assumed to be provided by FPL. We do include 10 We do NOT include the services of a Private Provider for permit document review. Page 1 of 6 204 Exhibit"B"Assumptions and Clarifications (W 11 At least on a quarterly basis during the project time the Owner shall provide updated and clouded design drawings of full size incorporating all sketches and all design clarifications. 12 We do NOT include the cost required for the subcontractors to provide a payment and performance bond for the project. 13 We do NOT include additional attic stock for materials, except what is specifically listed in the specification manual, or in these Assumptions and Clarifications. 14 We have assumed that this.project will run concurrent with the IRCSO Crime Lab Project currently under construction. 15 We will provide as-built drawings as required by the contract documents. 16 We do NOT include over time/premium time for any of our subcontractors. 17 We do NOT include the excessive escalation costs caused by circumstances beyond our control of any materials due to anomalies of (W any kind. 18 We do NOT include unforeseen conditions which prohibit the scope of this work. 19 We do NOT include the cost for Electrical Service for the any duration of the project.We include the cost for temporary electrical sei vice for our trailer only. 22 We assume that once the project drawings are complete Proctor will be allowed to reprice the project to confirm the assumptions made herein Siteworks 1 We have included an allowance for Landscaping which includes the following: (Fifteen(15) Code Required Buffer Trees;One Hundered and Sixty(160)Buffer Hedges @ 2'-0" O.C; 29,700 SF of Bahia Sod; 15, 400 SF of Bahia Sod for the Drainage Swale. 2 We have included an allowance of$4,000 for Irrigation for new Landscaping. (W 3 We do NOT include maintenance of landscaping or irrigation at any time. Page 2of6 205 Exhibit"B"Assumptions and Clarifications (W 4 We do NOT include the excavation,removal or contention with any rock or muck 5 We include.importing two(2) feet of fill for the building pad. 1-200CY of Import Fill for the Building Pad. 6 We include 2,295 CY Import Fill; 3705 SY Grading and 725CY of Cut for the Drainage Swale for the Site Cut, Fill &Grade. 7 We include 100LF of 1" Poly and the tie into the existing Water Line. 8 We include 200L.F 18" CAP; 80 LF of 8" ADS, 320 LF 6" ADS Storm Drainage. This includes connection to downspouts. We include two(2) Type "D" Structures and 1 Control Structure. 9 We include 1120 SY of 1.5" S-I Asphalt Pavement. We include 1,180 SY of 8" Stabilization and 1,150 SY of 6" Coquina Rock. 10 Due to the uncertainty of the liquid index for asphalt,the cost included in (W the GMP may be subject to re-negotiation if the liquid price increases by more than five percent(5%)prior to commencement of the paving project. Concrete 1 We include a Continuous Footing and Pad Footings at Metal Building Columns with size based upon RF Concrete's previous experience in conjunction with the detail provided by Mike Lue. 2 We include Termite Treatment under slab on grade. 3 We include 5" thick w/#8 wire mesh and 6 mil vapor barrier for slab on grade. 4 The concrete pricing is set to increase by S7/yd if not provided a written agreement by July 1, 2013.The pricing include in this proposal is based upon securing the job prior to July 1st. Masonry (W 1 We do NOT include any Concrete Masonry. Page 3of6 206 Exhibit"B"Assumptions and Clarifications Af Metals 1 We include CECO Metal Building 80'x 125' Open Bay Structure and attached enclosed 25'x 40'Metal Building. 2 We include CECO Metal Building.152mph,Exposure C,2010 FL Bldg Code. 3 We include CECO Metal Building with the following features: 1" by 12" Roof Slope; 16'-0" Eave Height;24ga PBR screw-down panels as Galvalume Plus;26ga PBR panel, Sig 200, Standard Colors. 4 We include all trim,gutters and downspouts on both sides on main 80'x 125'building. 5 We include all primary and secondary framing as red oxide primer on closed portion of the building.We include hot dipped galvanizing in the open bay primary and secondary structural members. 6 We include an allowance of$3,500 for Metal Bollards for Column Protection. Wood 1 We do NOT include any Woodwork. Thermal& Moisture Protection 1 We do NOT include any building insulation. 2 We do NOT include any waterproofing. Doors&Windows 1 We do NOT included any field testing of windows or storefronts. 2 We do NOT include any windows. 3 We include(1) 14'x 10 Roll-up Door with Powder Coat. 4 We include an allowance of$800 for two (2)hollow metal frames,doors and hardware. Finishes Page 4of6 207 Exhibit"B"Assumptions and Clarifications 1 We do NOT include any finishes. Specialties 1 We do NOT any specialties. Equipment 1 We do NOT anv eauinment Furnishings 1 We do NOT include loose furniture or furnishings. We do NOT include the installation of loose furniture or furnishings. Vertical Transportation 1 N/A (W Plumbing 1 We do NOT include any plumbing work. Fire Protection 1 We include a wet pipe NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system hydraulically designed in strict accordance with NFPA 13 standards. 2 We include tapping into the existing main servicing the Crime Scene Building and bringing the new main 200 LF to service the new facility. 3 We include upright heads and exposed black sprinkler pipe in all areas. We do NOT include galvanizing of sprinkler piping. HVAC 1 We include an allowance of$4,000 for a Louver and Exhaust Fan. (W Page 5 of 6 208 Exhibit"B"Assumptions and Clarifications Electrical 1 We include one(1)200 amp single phase underground electric service to 200 trench length. 2 We include the installation of twenty-six(26) owner supplied high bay fixtures and three(3) switches for control. 3 We include sixteen(16) GFI protected duplex receptacles with three(3) 20 amp circuits. 4 We include one(1)2" conduit back to the IT Room in the Crime Scene Building. 5 We include two (2)cat 6 Drops and three(3)360 degree IP cameras including all cable hardware POE switch and programming. i Page 6 of 6 209 MOSS & Dekker Landscaping Estimate 2036 Magnolia Lane (W Vero Beach, FL 32963 Project: IRCSO Vehicle 772.360.7132 Compound sjkross@aol.com Date: June 10, 2013 Item Description Qty Rate Total ALLOWANCES Subject to County Review: Remove Sycamore tree & replace w/ Code tree 1 600.00 600.00 Code tree, 12' ht. 30' o.c. South side 15 250.00 3,750.00 Buffer hedge 2' o.c. South side 160 10.00 1,600.00 Bahia Sod - s.f. 29,700 0.18 5,346.00 Bahia Sod - Drainage swale 700' x 22' 15,400 0.18 2,772.00 TOTAL: $ 14,068.00 NOTES: 1 Permit fees not included. 2 Removals not included. 3 Prices subject to change if proposal not accepted within 30 days. Page 1 of 1 210 SITE WSRK IMSI®M CATNCO, INCM 5550 4151 STREET * VERO BEACH,FL 32967 * (772) 562-8814 * FAX (772)562-0173 cathcoinc@,bellsouth.net Date: June 3, 2013 To: Proctor Construction Company 2050 US-1 Suite 200 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Budget For: IRC Vehicle Storage Barn Vero Beach, Florida We hereby propose to furnish labor, equipment and materials for the following: ITEM QUANTITY BUDGET Building Pad 1,200 CY Import Fill; 1,225 SY Grade $ 13,000.00 Site Cut,Fill'& Grade 2,295 CY Import Fill; 3,705 SY Grade $ 37,000.00 725 CY—Cut Swale Water System 100 LF I"Poly; Tie to Existing $ 950.00 Storm Drainage 200 LF 18" CAP $ 15,500.00 80 LF 8" ADS 320 LF 6" ADS 15 EA Downspouts Storm Structures 2 EA Type"C" $ 6,150.00 1 EA—Control Structure 8" Stabilization 1,180 SY $ 5,900.00 6" Coquina Rock 1,150 SY $ 10,925.00 1.5" S-I Asphalt 1,120 SY $ 19,320.00 For the total budget amount of: $108,745.00 NOTES: I. This is Only a Budget Number Based on Drawing Sent on May 29, 2013, Cathco Will Finalize Price After We Receive a Completed Set of Plans and Specifications. 2. Proposal Includes Importing 2 Feet of Fill For Building Pad and Site. Page 1 of 2 211 Cathco, Inc Budget for IRC Vehicle Storage Barn June 3,2013 SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED FROM THIS BUDGET ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: Permits; Engineering; Bonds& Fees; Sod, Seed&Mulch, and Landscaping; Irrigation System; Repair/Relocation of Existing Utilities/Services in Conflict with this Work; Removal,Disposal and Replacement of Unsuitable Materials;Demucking;Driveway Sidewalks; Concrete Flatwork; Erosion Control;Power Pole Removal/Relocation, Due to volatility in the worldwide asphalt market,prices for asphaltic concrete quoted wherein are null and void should the price of liquid asphalt exceed $ 700 per ton. Should the Federal Court render as adverse decision on the Lake Belt ruling, asphalt aggregate may become too scarce to guarantee supply. Asphalt prices included in this quotation would become null and void. Not responsible for birdbaths or water flow when projects are designed with less than 2%fall on asphalt pavement. It is Cathco's intention to place all pipe and structures by properly sloping the,excavation in observance of the Florida Trench Safety Act. It is not our intent, unless specified in this proposal, to sheet, shore or employ a trench box. Therefore, we must look to you to provide us with adequate room to use the slope method. Should it be more convenient for you to require us to sheet or shore,the cost of such measures will be for your account. Further,the use of a trench box will add $20.00 per lineal foot to the unit pipe prices. (W The excavation, treatment or disposal of contaminated soil, (as defined by the guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency), that may be encountered during the course of this project shall not be considered incidental to the work. The cost of such excavation, treatment or disposal by those properly licensed will be the responsibility of the owner. Resp itted, Matt . Eisert As Agent for Cathco, Inc. Page 2 of 2 212 JOB NAME: re -�-�~S I'j(ITj�° L�'r(tG f DATE: JOB ADDRESS: CONTACT: PHONE: C\ILING ADDRESS: MOBILE: FAX: EMAIL ADDRESS: JOB t [1(2d 1 _ 61 DIRECTIONS: PERMIT#i: STYLE FENCE ( h6l 1 n T11� HEIGHT J I FOOTAGE q W yn �,,n HEIGHT FOOTAGE qD �( SELVAGE WIRE of N tCONCRETE LINE POST �� 0 CONCRETE TERMINAL POST ' `7 0 ta - POST SPAC r0flBRAC RAIL I 1 O.C. TENSION WIRE r--A BARBED WIRE YZ q S��1-4 1tZ>6- WALK GATE r SIZE FRAME n+ALK GATE SIZE FRAME CONCRETE f _ LK GATE POST 0 .7D. tlb6 DRIVE ,h r GATE SIZE FRAME •� ' DRIVE GATE POST C/ )6 qO,— CONCRETOE - DRIVE i GATE SIZE FRAME CONCRETE 7 DRIVE GATE POST CORE DRILL/ASPHALT PRIVACY SLATS .zk/ PRORLINES CLEARED Y CUSTOMER APPROVAL: vEs PROP.MARKS VISIBLE No COST#jj,., 52VDEPOSIT BALANCE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TERMS I(I C�T r O 0 THIS PRICE EFFECTIVE UNTIL PERSONNEL — Etnal�Ci61g ".�:SA. INSTALLER DATE 213 PROPOSAL RF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. Box 650789, Vero Beach, Florida 32965 664 Old Dixie Highway, Vero Beach, Florida 32962 Phone: 772-567-3356/Fax: 772-778-2142 Jeremy Crfgccnstructi on.com Proposal Submitted To Phone Date Proctor Construction 772-234-8164 June 11, 2013 Street Job Name 2050 US Highway One IRC Sheriff's Crime Scene Fac. City, State and Zip Job Location Proposal#9 Revised Vero Beach, Florida 32960 3885 41s', Vero Beach, FL Storage Building Attn: Fax: E-mail. Nick Bischoff 234-8188 nbischoff@proctorcc.com We hereby submit an estimate for labor and material to complete the following: Concrete Work: • Continuous footing • Pad footing • Termite treatment • Slab-on-grade: 5"thick w/#4 wire mesh, Emil vapor barrier • Grout column bases TOTAL _ $72,900.00 NOTE: Foundation price is preliminary and subject to change once engineering has been completed Metal Building by CECO Building Systems: • Size: 80'-0" x 125'-0"x 16'-0" Eave Heights, and 40'-0" x 25'-0" x 16'-0" Eave • Windload— 152mph, Exposure C, 2010 Florida Building Code • Roof slope— 1" in 12" • Roof panels—24ga, PBR screw-down panels, Galvalume Plus • Wall panels—26ga PBR panel, Sig. 200, color TBD All trim, Gutters and Downspouts both sides, color TBD • (1) 3070 man door and frame with all hardware—white • 10' x 12' Framed opening • All primary and secondary framing to have red oxide primer Anchor bolts—hot dipped galvanized • Engineering of metal building and drawings included Erection of building included TOTAL - $123,750.00 OPTIONS: 1. Hot dipped galvanizing in the open area of the building. . . . . ADD - $9,266.00 LIRC Sheriff's Crime Scene Facility l Storage Building Proposal 214 (bWAOTES: 1. The option for galvanizing is for the primary and secondary framing on the open area only. Keep in mind, anytime we do an open building like this, I try to stress for what it will cost to paint all the steel plus the cost in maintaining it every four years or so, the owner could of just went with the Galvanized and saved a lot of money in the long run. 2.. There is going to be a$7.001Yd. increase in.ready mixed concrete beyond July 1st on any work that is not secured by an existing written agreement. Not Included: • Permits • Site work • Exterior concrete work • Bollards—It is recommended that bollards be used to protect the columns and framed openings • Overhead door, windows, louvers, exhaust fans PAYMENT SCHEDULE. Invoices due 10 days after date of invoice. All past due amounts are subject to 2% per month late charge. All agreements are contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. All work is to be completed in a workmanlike manner. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. Chis proposal is subject to acceptance within 30 days and is void thereafter at the option of the undersigned. RF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Authorized Signature: ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL: The above prices, specifications and conditions are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. DATE OF ACCEPTANCE: SIGNATURE: QC Sheriff's Crime Scene Facility 2 Storage Building Proposal 215 Proposal AMERICAN ROLL-UP DOOR CO. (W 10501 Rocket Blvd. ORLANDO,FLORIDA 32824 Since 0000 (407) 857-2427 FAX (407) 857.2458 Email:ardoriando@bellsouth.net PROPOSAL NO. J.L.file CONTACT NAME PHONE: DATE Nick Bischoff nbischoff@proctorce.com 772-794-3563 5/30113 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO JOB NAME PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION INDIAN RIVER SHERIFF'S VEHICLE STORAGE STREET JOB LOCATION CITY,STATE,ZIP PAGE JOB PHONE VERO BEACH, FL. 1 OF 1 VERO BEACH, FL. We hereby submit specmitions and estimates for. 1 ea. 14'w X 10%COILING STEEL SLAT DOOR.MOTOR OPER. POWDER COAT FINISH.WINDLOADED. 30 P.S.F.`:'iNDLOAD. i PHOTO EYES,BOTTOM REVERSING SAFETY EDGE. CORNELL MDL.ESD 10 iNSTAI J.F.D,TAX INCLUDED$5,610.00 (W No permits provided by American Roll-Up Door Company. Proper preparation of opening by others. No Painting,caulking,electrical wiring or hook-up by American Roll-Up Door Company. Minor scratches and dents are not considered a defect. We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor-complete in accordance with above specifications,for the stun of AS ABOVE __ Dollars($ SEE ABOVEI Payment to be made as follows: Any costs incurred,as a result of non-payment of Invoice,including court costs and attorney fee,sill be sustained by customer. 1.5%per month service charge on all past due accounts. E 30 DAYS J All material Is guammeed to be as specifies.All work to be completed in a wodkunlike Authorized Manner acing to standard pracjr4&Any alleralion or deviation Bok abow specifications Signature - — Involving eedm costs will be executed only upon written order;and will become an extra Joh ger chuge over and above the estimate.All ogreemenu eontingeot upon rtrikms accidents Note:This pro 0a y be or delays beyond our control.owner to carry fire,tornado and other necessary,insurance. withdrawn by tf toot accepted�vithiII 30 days' parr worker are Posy covered by Workman's CompeasatiOn lawrewe. Acceptance of Proposal--The above prices,specifications And conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted.You are Signature authorized to do the work as specified.Payment Will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature (W 216 ti N QuANnTY&MARK: MOTOR SPECIFICATIONS: ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LIST: BOTTOM BAR LOCKING: (1) VEHICLE STORAGE 1/3 HP motor to Include s 70W motor,m"sing"gestic eaneoll"r to 1-alsorie sensing edge w/SJO coil raid. NEMA t o,dowro.pheawry geo box radMe reducum dadrk b1 m 1-Three button push bAton station'OPEN-CLOSE-STOP'in and an sudgery Nein operator.Irn,des UL listed awnma ovW"d NEMA 1 erldestre,surface mounted. W*dim,mt y omit 3,ech",eddy edge droltand"a"eretmer weh 24 1.Photo eye,NEMA 4X �coned secondary,aad Mlay on reverse.Pre4 vkW to a tomdnal bock MATERIAL d FINISH: using color eomg of the wags to ramew"wubleanowrro. Curtain-Gahantzed steel,phosphatized,0yesler powder on" (See note belowl) Bottom Bar-SbutAval sloes,polyester Powder coating (See CURRENT CHARACTERISTICS: note belowp SUPPORT TO RUN TO TOP OF COIL" cw+dgs-note belo steel'polyester powder rbaWlg (See 120 V 1 PH 60 HZ nota disd steel F�ao,d•GeNanizad steel wdtt GelveNex TM wetin9 system- Electrical current must be verified In writing before job is Finish clot.Cornell greY released for manufacture;current verified and found correct. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL,FL.11329 PlainSt"! Powder coaled Cornell 9rey Door Ko withstand designed Windload oft 30 P.S.F. -NOTE ple9nverity powder colorl Signed: 6-314"t 6-3/4"t ? 16" 12"t —20 MID-HOOD SUPPORT I (I ROVIDEDx SOLID WALL CONSTRUCTION REQ D. 1-1/2"TOP HOOD BEAD (BY OTHERS) f0 f� 'D`HOOD SPRING •' 4 c ADJUSTOR ROLLING DOOR #2`t.GA iNTERLOCKING SLATS = w w O x x c = i JUNCTION BOX o cg o Z (BY OTHERS) LU 13: ? r a 0 S SENSING EDGE COIL CORD CFWH KEEPEI>; AUXILWJ2Y PADLOCK BY OTHERS HAND CHAIN MAX 114"0 SHANK 14'-0" OPENING WIDTH 1/2" W-1" 31/2" 3 1/2" DISTANCE BETWEEN GUIDES ELEVATION(COIL SIDE)AND SECTION VIEW MODELC pee 04-25-2013 PRODUcr coce: See drawing# F_ST#801384 001-i for guide detail. ESD10 EST#801384 001 A MTR_STDR MFI 5F 22GC rawin Date:05/30/13 TIma:13:4s:os:ss ®�� MGH MOTOR AMERICAN ROLLUP DR-ORLANDO OPERATED ROLLING DOOR CON71tIVD7OrC SAFE AND SECURE PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION — ORIGINAL DRAWING WEB INDIAN RIVER CNTY.VEHICLE STORAGE ,,s, y; # REVISION DATE BY www.comaillron.com VERO BEACH FL 00 V_ q.►,...o,�a.w m..,"t hma�v�.,wima0 rue a h.aaea..m,n.wm,uew�anwno Iw"akllm roaJ,wn.nl.. 4^ 4' 212' 11/2' 11/2' 212' i 17110' 1 7/18• 9"x r x 3/18'(TYP.) 1118" 41/4" 41/4' 11/8' 31/2"x312'z1/4" 213118' 213118" 112' 312°x31/rx1/4' 1 111- 17/1 11nB• 3!4•x3!8• 3•z 3112"x 1/4"(M) RAT 'UI 3/1 W MEL BRACKET PLATE ABOVE G12A -4114" G12A-4114" WALL FASTENERS: ASSEMBLY FASTENERS: WALL FASTENERS: ASSEMBLY FASTENERS: AT 18'ON CENTER AT 1 W ON CENTER AT t WON CENTER AT 18"ON CENTER 1/4"FILET WELD INSIDE ENTIRE •SCREW,HEX HEAD.GRADE S.RATED, 1/4"FILET WELD INSIDE ENTIRE -SCREW.HEX HEAD,GRADE 8,PLATED, 12=1 TER OF WALL FASTENER 72.13 x:-12' PERIMETER OF WALL FASTENER 12-13 x 1-112• SLOT (2)-WASHER,FLAT.SAE HIGH STRENGTH, SLOT (2)•WASHER,FLAT,SAE HIGH STRENGTH, - • N,0.531 10 x 1.082 OD x 0.095 THK MIN.1/4"THICK STEEL PLATED,1/2'• -MIN.114"THICK STEEL PLATED, G 0.531 ro x 1.382 OD x O.D95 THK NUT,HEX,GRADE 8,PLATED,12-13 NUT,HEX GRADE DE 8.PLATED,112-13 C20P SLAT MK:VEHICLE STORAGE PLAN OF OPENING INSTALLERS NOTE: -3/4' MAINTAINING FACTORY SET GUIDE GAPS IS CRITICAL TO THE PROPER OPERATION OFTHE DOOR AND IT'S ABILITY TO WITHSTAND THE DESIGNED WINDLOADI r ;,' '• 1a'-o^ ENDLOCK DETAIL .I •.• OPENING WIDTH .•, :,' C827P CAST RON ENDLOCKI WINDLOCK ON ALTERNATING 12" SLATS WITH 2 x 114"RIVETS. 2 5/8^ 0 . g 0 4 C627P 0310-2010 IPRODUCI CODE DISTANCE BETWEEN GUIDES MODEL It. JOB Y: MFI 5F 22GC ESO EST#801384 001 B SD3 425 rnw 0ffi8:05/30/13 Time:13AS*.13:54 �� SERVICE DOOR GUIDE ASSEMBLY AMERICAN ROLLUP DR-ORLANDO 43/4"PACKOFF cox7RAcnJR SAFE ANa SECURE PROCTOR CONSTRUCTION Joe: -- ORIGINAL DRAWING WEB INDIAN RIVER CNTY.VEHICLE STORAGE uscxnEDr: # REVISION DATE BY www.comelliron.com VERO BEACH FL ,� Complete Electric, Inc. Complete Alarm, Inc. 637 Sebastian Blvd. Sebastian, FI. 32958 Indian River: (772)388-0533 Brevard: (321)726=0601 St. Lucie: (772) 344-3444 Fax: (772)388-2491 www.completeelectricinc.com Date: 6-3-2013 Name: Proctor Construction Company Address: 2050 US Highway 1, Suite 200 City: Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone: 772-234-8164 Fax: 772-234-8188 Re: IRC Sher iff0s Department Storage/impound Building—Budget Number Complete Electric, Inc. Is Pleased To Present You With The Quote Detailed Below: Scope of--Nor k;.-Budget rsurrnber for above referenced project. including the following: • One 200 arnp single please underground elect.r is service sale to 2000 trench length. • Install 26 oirrser ss.slaplied high bay fixl.ur es and three sii-itches for control. • Sixl.een GPI protected duplex receptacles with three 20 arnp circuits. • One 20 conduit bacl-k to IT r ooin in cr irrse scene building. Two cat. 6 data drops. • Three 360 degree IP cameras. All cable har divar e POE savitch and programming is included. Base Electrical Includes Tax $17,200.00 Total $17,200.00 Complete Electric,Inc.and Complete Mann,Inc. Pare I of 2 219 This Proposal Is Based On Only Those Items Denoted By(X) (W {)Specification Section: ()Plans: Dated: {)Addendum: If The AHJ Requires Additional Devices Or Items Not Indicated On The Plans,Or Not Included In The Specifications They Will Be Added At Additional Cost. Quote Based On Working Hours,7:00 AM-3:30 PM. Damage Resulting From the Installation Of Our Scope Of Work To Underground Items That Have Not Been Identified By Locates Will Not Be The Sole Responsibility Of The Electrical Contractor. No Permit fees or FPL fees are included in the above quote.Quote is valid for 30 days.All Work will be performed in accordance to the National Electric Code standards and local ordinances.Please contact us if we can provide you with any additional information. Estimator: Fred Klein Payment Schedule: To Be Determined PAYME-N-T-IJABILTX Customer signature signifies authorization of quoted work and acceptance of payment liability.Payment is due upon completion of work or satisfactory passing of any required inspection.If the invoice is not paid and theContractor engages an attorney to enforce collection the customer agrees to pay all expenses including court costs and reasonable attorney fees to be fixed by any court in which said attorney is required to appear.The Customer further agrees that he or she may be sued in an Indian River County,Florida Court, ------------ ------------ -- --- -- - ---------------------- ---- ---- Customer Signature Date File: F:\QU0TES\PR0CT0R\IRC Sheriff's DEPT Crime Scene Building.doc Complete Electric,Inc.Confidential. (W (W Complete Elect6c,Inc.and Complete Alann,Inc. Page 2 of 2 220 )9 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES AGENDA ITEM Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2013 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke P.E., Director of Utility Service Vg Prepared & Terry Southard Operations Manager Staffed By: Department of Utility Services Subject: Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Permit Renewal and Blue Cypress Wastewater Treatment Facility BACKGROUND: The existing Central Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility, (CRWWTF), operates under Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit number FLA010431, which expires March 29, 2014. The CRWWTF annual average daily flow (AADF), influent flows through May 2013, approaching 1.8 mgd. The facility is a 4.0 mgd, and no increase in treatment plant capacity is proposed for this facility. The CRWWTF provides service to the Central service area as well as the North County & North Beach area. Effluent is pumped to the County Reuse system that supplies reuse water to various golf courses. The existing Blue Cypress Wastewater Treatment Facility, operates under Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit number FLA010439, which expires April 19, 2014. The facility is a 0.020 MGD, and influent flows through May 2013 is 3,000 gallons per day and no increase in treatment plant capacity is proposed for this facility. The Blue Cypress WWTF provides service to the Blue Cypress lake home & fish camp. Effluent flows into small pond which overflows into a wetlands area. MBV and Associates, Inc. will prepare and submit an application for permit renewals, and respond to requests for additional information (RAI) from FDEP that may arise as a result of the application submittal. The intent is to submit the application by September 20, 2013, six months prior to its expiration date, in order to allow for FDEP agency review and RAI response time. RECOMMENDATION: It is Staff s recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the following: a) Approve Work Order No. 7 MBV Engineering Inc. Inc. in the amount of $24,250 to prepare and submit permit renewal packages. ACCOUNT INFORMATION: y X Central Regional WWTF 4712353b-033190 -4$20,750.00" Blue Cypress WWTF 47123536-033190 $3,500.00 2 n 1 (•\ilrx•.mmnte.—1 CNftinoe\a�!+rrta'•.txrhlilPx4Pn,14onnAH- NARV Camra)—i R!".`?nnnif Rn.....—;—Wri 1 T—.M.Inti.IN A-, L (W LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Work Order No. 7 APPROVED FOR AGENDA: Indian River Co. Appr d I Date Administration fG 3 By: Utilities l oseph Aaird, County Administrator Budget Legal1. For: Risk Manager Date (W 222 1 C•\T)nra—ts and gettine,.Aanhertaut.chlDeaktnn\Aaenda.MRv Central and Rhie Permit Renewal to W(1 7 Tune 10 11.011(3)dnr (W WORK ORDER NUMBER 7 ............ This-W&k.-Crd-iR N-UMNFr 71§en!�eeiM lhfbds of - -------day-o-f pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15, 2011 (the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and M13V Engineering, Inc. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1 (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 1 (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit I (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all In accordance with the terms and provisions set forth In the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained In any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be Incorporated In each Individual Work Order as If fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (W MBV Engineering, Inc. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: - By: Chairman Title: BCC Approved Date: Attest:Jeffrey R. Smith,Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: ?oAse"pht.Baird,County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: AI S. Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney 223 i i EXHIBIT 1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY UTILITIESYDEP PERMIT RENEWALS ------ ----------- ------A-T--BL-T3E-C-YP-RI{�fiS WWTF AST-D-C-TNTI2-Ab-WWTF----- -----------. ---------- i GENERAL The Indian River County Central Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) Operating Permit (FLA010431)will expire on March 29, 2014 and the Blue Cypress WWTF Permit(FLA010439) will expire on April 19, 2014. Rule 62-620.335 of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) requires that all wastewater treatment facilities renew the FDEP Operating Permit every five years. Applications for permit renewal must be submitted to the appropriate FDEP office six months prior to the expiration of the FDEP Permit. Therefore, the renewal application for the Indian River County Central WWTF is due on or before September 29, 2013. and the Blue Cypress WWTF renewal application is due on or before October 19, 2013. The following scope is provided to address these items. SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 —Site Inspection I CONSULTANT will conduct the required site inspections to inspect the site and ineet with the plant operators. The inspections will include an evaluation of the following: 1. The general condition of the facility 2. Component, system, and process reliability standards as required by Rule 17- 600.400(l)(b), F.A.C. 3. Component,system,and process operations 4. Hydraulic and organic loading 5. Safety features 6. Operator certifications 7. Facility maintenance program 8. Facility records 9. Sampling procedures 10.. Laboratory analysis procedures Task 2—Tabulation and Analysis of Plant Operating Data CONSULTANT will tabulate and analyze, as required by FDEP, historical plant operating data, which documents plant operating conditions for the duration of the current operating permit. Plant operating data will be provided by Indian River County Utilities (IRCU) staff as specified in the "Required Information to be Provided by County" section found within this Scope of Services. Task 3—Preparation and Submittal of FDEP Permit Renewal Application CONSULTANT will prepare and provide to FDEP and IRCU, the following applications and forms necessary to obtain the facility's required operating permit. Page 1 of 3 224 a.+t r.�i111V11 Compensation for IRCU Work Order No. 7 services described herein are detailed below for each facility and will be based on the Lump Sum Method in accordance with Section 5 of the Agreement. The total estimated fee shall not exceed $24,250 without mutual agreement by the County and CONSULTANT. The compensation for each facility shall be as follows: Task 1 —Blue Cypress WWTF FDEP Permit Renewal $3,500 Task 2—Central WWTF FDEP Permit Renewal $20,750 The cost of permit fees has not been included in this proposal. It is anticipated that the permit application fee for the Blue Cypress WWTF will be$1,000 and the permit application fee for the Central WWTF will be$5,000. Page 2 of 3 Indian River County, Florida Property Appraiser- Printer Friendly Map Page 1 of 1 Print Back Le Indian River County GIS I� Parce]ID OwnerName PropertyAddress 33392400000500000013.0 INDIAN RIVER 830 9TH ST SW VERO BEACH,FL COUNTY 32962 Notes L httn-//www.ircna.ora/PrintMan.asnx 6/12/2013228 Indian River County, Florida Property Appraiser-Printer Friendly Map Page 1 of 1 Print Back (W Indian River County GIS Parce1ID OwnerName PropertyAddress 33392400000500000012.0 KAH DEVELOPMENT 820 9TH ST SW VERO BEACH,FL CORP 32962 Notes L httn-//www ircna.oru/PrintMan-acnx 6/12/20111-1-9 ,r ATTORNEY'S MATTERS: 6/18/2013 Ofce of INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ,,, ATTORNEY Alan S.Polackwich,Sr.,County Attorney William K.DeBraal,Deputy County Attorney Brooke W.Odom,Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Dana C. Larsen, County Attorney Inter THROUGH: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney DATE: June 7, 2013 RE: William Luther License Agreement In November 2006, the County, with assistance from the Indian River Land Trust, purchased the Ryall Property from Ms. Ryall's estate for $1,150,000. The 10.1 acre Ryall Property and the 29 acre purchase of the former Shadowbrook Estates subdivision property were acquired in furtherance of preservation of the (W headwaters of the St. Sebastian River. The Ryall property contained an older single family house and a detached shed. The house was recently refurbished and updated by the County and is now ready to be occupied. The County is not in a position to make improvements to the remainder of the Ryall property at this time. In order to provide maintenance, protection and security for the property with a police presence, the County is prepared to enter into a license agreement with a Sheriff's Deputy for residing in the house on the property. The County has drafted a license agreement with William Luther ("Luther") to use and occupy the real property and improvements located at 7780 W' Street Vero Beach, Florida 32967. Luther is to maintain the single family residence, detached shed,__and approximately 1 acre yard area. The term of this license shall be one year from the date of approval of this license agreement by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. APPROVED FOR J/ --- iadlas River Co. A roved Date B.C.C. MELTING - AGENDA Admin. 170 Co.Atte. is •16-a UNTY..A NEYj Budget Dept: Risk Mgr. 230 MEMORANDUM — Luther License June 7, 2013 Page 2 The details of the agreement are as follows: Licensee shall: • Provide general security on the Licensed Property, including parking a marked or unmarked patrol car (Indian River County Sheriff's Office) on the property when Licensee is present on the property; • Maintain the yard area in a mowed, attractive and safe condition; • Periodically mow the approximately twenty five (25) foot wide West grass area of the Licensed Property, and the yard area in front of the house of the approximately twenty nine (29) acre Property known as the Shadowbrook Estates parcel South and adjacent to the Licensed Property, outlined in white on Exhibit A. • Maintain the single family residence and detached shed in a safe and attractive condition, and protect the residence and shed from deterioration from the elements, insects and pests, and other such conditions; • Arrange and pay for (including deposits, if any) all utilities, including, without limitation, water, sewer, electricity, telephone, cable television, etc. • Commit no act or omission which would result in waste, damage or destruction to any portion of the Licensed Property; • Commit no act or omission which would result in a mortgage, encumbrance, lien or other right, title or interest in the Licensed Property being acquired by any third party; • Commit no act or omission which would constitute a violation of any applicable local, state or federal law, or a nuisance or annoyance to surrounding properties or owners or occupants of surrounding properties; and • Advise Licensor immediately of any security issues, damage to the Licensed Property, or any other events or conditions which could result in damage to the property, liability to Licensor, or any other such adverse impact to the Licensed Property or to Licensor. 231 MEMORANDUM — Luther License (W June 7, 2013 Page 3 Funding: The County acquired the property with partial funding from the Florida Communities Trust (FCT), and the Property is subject to certain limitations provided in the FCT Declaration. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the license agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement on behalf of the Board. WKD Attachments (W 232 LICENSE AGREEMENT ,,,, THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is entered into as of this _ day of June, 2013, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("Licensor"), and William Luther, a resident of Indian River County, Florida("Licensee"), as follows: 1. License. Licensor grants to Licensee a revocable license to use and occupy the real property and improvements described on Exhibit A attached hereto,which property and improvements generally include a single family residence, a detached shed, and an approximately one (1) acre yard area(collectively"Licensed Property"). Specifically, Licensee is authorized to use and occupy the Licensed Property solely as a single family residence for Licensee, and for no other purpose. 2. Florida Communities Trust: Licensor has acquired the property with partial funding from the Florida Communities Trust (FCT), and the Property is subject to certain limitations provided in the FCT Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (as recorded in OR Book 2282, Page 2445 in Indian River County)(the "Declaration). As part and condition of the FCT funding, the Licensor provided, and FT approved, a Management Plan for the project site, and together with the Declaration, the terms of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. FCT shall be notified of all leases, easements or other similar documents that affect property funded by FCT. The Declaration's restrictions on the FCT funded property are superior to any other restrictions placed upon the property. Licensor intends that the conservation and recreation values of the Property be preserved and enhanced in accordance with the Management Plan, as it may be amended from time to time only after review and approval by (W FCT. All activities by the Licensor and Licensee shall be consistent with the Declaration and Management Plan. 3. Term. The term of this license shall be one (1)year from the date of approval of this License Agreement by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners. The term shall be subject to renewal for additional one (1) year terms, upon the mutual agreement of both parties. 4. Licensee's Duties. Licensee shall: a. Provide general security on the Licensed Property, including parking a marked or unmarked patrol car (Indian River County Sheriff's Office) on the property when Licensee is present on the property; b. Maintain the yard area in a mowed, attractive and safe condition; c. Periodically mow the approximately twenty five (25) foot wide West grass area of the Licensed Property, and the yard area in front of the house of the approximately twenty nine (29) acre Property known as the Shadowbrook Estates parcel South and adjacent to the Licensed Property, outlined in white on Exhibit A. d. Maintain the single family residence and detached shed in a safe and attractive condition, and protect the residence and shed from deterioration from the elements, insects and pests,and other such conditions; 233 e. Arrange and pay for(including deposits, if any) all utilities, including, without limitation, ° water, sewer, electricity,telephone, cable television, etc. r+ f. Commit no act or omission which would result in waste, damage or destruction to any portion of the Licensed Property; g. Commit no act or omission which would result in a mortgage, encumbrance, lien or other right,title or interest in the Licensed Property being acquired by any third party; h. Commit no act or omission which would constitute a violation of any applicable local, state or federal law, or a nuisance or annoyance to surrounding properties or owners or occupants of surrounding properties; and i. Advise Licensor immediately of any security issues, damage to the Licensed Property, or any other events or conditions which could result in damage to the property, liability to Licensor, or any other such adverse impact to the Licensed Property or to Licensor. 5. Licensor's Duties. Licensor shall: a. Repair the Licensed Property, to the extent that the need for repair is not caused by Licensee's negligence, intentional misconduct or violation of this License Agreement or applicable law; and b. Commit no act or omission which would constitute a violation of any applicable local, state or federal law. 6. License Fee. Provided Licensee performs all terms and conditions of this License Agreement,Licensee shall not be required to pay a license fee. 7. Improvements. Licensee shall make no alterations or improvements to the Licensed Property without the express written approval of Licensor, which may be withheld in the sole and absolute discretion of Licensor. 8. Public Events. Licensee also acknowledges that the grant agreement between Licensor and FCT requires that Licensor hold a minimum of twelve (12) public, educational events at the License Property each year. Licensee consents to such events and will cooperate with Licensor with respect to such events. Without limitation, Licensee will make the Licensed Property available for such events, in a clean,attractive and safe condition. 9. Insurance. Licensee shall obtain (a) a comprehensive general liability insurance policy with respect to the Licensed Property, in the minimum amounts of $200,000 per person and $300,000 per incident, which policy shall name Licensor as an additional named insured. Prior to occupancy, Licensee shall provide to Licensor a certificate of insurance confirming that such policy has been obtained and is in full force and effect, and confirming that such policy will not be cancelled without thirty (30) days' prior written notice to Licensor. Such policy shall be primary to any liability insurance obtained by Licensor with respect to the Licensed Property, and (b) such insurance on Licensee's personal property kept on the 2 234 Licensed Property, as Licensee deems appropriate. Licensee acknowledges that Licensor will maintain no insurance applicable to Licensee's personal property. (W 10. Indemnification. Licensee shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify Licensor, including its commissioners, officers, employees and agents, from and against any and all claims, causes of action, losses, damages, expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees), and other liabilities of any type whatsoever, arising out of or relating to Licensee's negligence, intentional misconduct, or violation of this License Agreement or applicable law. 11. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, either party may terminate this License Agreement upon sixty(60) days' written notice to the other; provided, however, that in the event that Licensor determines in its sole and absolute discretion that Licensee's continued occupancy of the Licensed Property could present a risk of damage or hann to the Licensed Property or persons on the Licensed Property (including, without limitation, Licensee), a risk of liability to Licensor, or otherwise'would not be in the bests interests of the Licensed Property or Licensor, Licensor shall have the right to terminate this license agreement immediately upon such shorter written notice as Licensor determines in its sole and absolute discretion is appropriate under the circumstances. 12.Default. In the event of default, the non-defaulting party shall be entitled to all remedies at law or in equity. [This space intentionally left blank] (W 3 235 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. ATTEST: JeffreyRSmith,, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Clerk of Court and Comptroller INDIAN RIVER COUNTY("Licensor") By: By: Deputy Clerk JOSEPH E. FLESCHER, Chairman Approved by BCC: , 2013. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney Approved: J s p hh A. Aaird, County Administrator WILLIAM LUTHER("Licensee") Reviewed and Approved by Florida Communities Trust: Division of State Lands 4 236 s: �- r, _ .. ." �• 49 June 18, 2013 ITEM 14.13.1 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 13, 2013 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment FROM: Wesley S. Davis Commissioner, District 1 kindly request the Board's consideration to discuss the Comprehensive Plan Text (w Amendment to Change Policy 5.7 as it relates to County Water Connections outside the Urban Service Area WSD:mlp F:\BCC\Agenda Items\2013\Davis\ECHB.docx Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,FLORIDA PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Commissioner Wesley S. Davis THROUGH Robert M.Keating,AICP; Community Development Directordok IM FROM: Stan Boling AIICP;Planning Director DATE: June 10,2013 SUBJECT: County Water Connections Outside the Urban Service Area Recently, you forwarded an e-mail from Tom Adrean to a number of staff, including Community Development Director Bob Keating and Planning Director Stan Boling. Mr. Adrean's e-mail noted that the County is installing a water line along 66`h Avenue between 8`h Street and 121' Street and believes that properties adjacent to the line should be able to be served by water from the new line. You asked for staff's thoughts about Mr. Adrean's e-mail. This memo is (kw Community DeveIopment's response. In the County's comprehensive plan, 66d' Avenue is designated as a collector roadway between Oslo Road and 16d' Street. Currently, the County is paving previously unpaved segments of 66`h Avenue and installing a bridge to provide a paved 2-lane road from SR60 to Oslo Road. As part of that project, Utility Services is installing an 8" water line that will eventually provide a loop for water lines at 4`h Street, 8d' Street, and 16`h Street. Except for the Pine Tree Park area, the segment of 66`h Avenue south of 16`h Street lies outside the Urban Service Area and traverses a low density rural area of the county. Although the referenced road and water improvements lie outside the Urban Service Area,that is not unusual. In many communities, infrastructure improvements, such as water and sewer lines, are located outside Urban Service Areas to provide a connection between urban areas, to provide service to qualified users such as agricultural industries,or to loop the system. In Indian River County, the comprehensive plan generally prohibits parcels lying outside the Urban Service Area from connecting to the county water system. That prohibition keeps urban development (and urban densities) within existing and planned future urban areas, protects agriculture and very low density residential/rural areas from urban development, prevents urban sprawl, and ensures that utility system expansion occurs in an orderly and cost efficient manner. Without that prohibition, connections to rural properties would occur, creating pressure for higher densities in rural areas and resulting in a Iess efficient water system layout. While the comprehensive plan provides certain exceptions to the general prohibition on water (W connections outside the Urban Service Area, those exceptions are limited to properties that abut the Urban Service Area boundary, have contaminated well water, contain agricultural related FACommunity DenlopmeMt CurDeATMs and cow pandenc 2013\W.Davis(waiemmicesoutsi&USA).doc 1 239 ,, industrial uses or are developed with a preferred land use pattern such as a traditional neighborhood design (see attached Policy 5.7). The exceptions do not apply to the 66th Avenue area referenced in Mr. Adrean's e-mail. If, however, a property owner in the subject area can document (through the Health Department) that he has contaminated well water, then existing Policy 5.7 allows connection. Given the above facts, Community Development does not believe that Policy 5.7 needs to be changed, since it adequately accommodates growth, directs urban development into appropriate areas,and protects rural areas from being converted to urban areas. If the Board determines that an additional exception is warranted for properties along 66th Avenue,then staff suggests that the exception be limited to legally created (grandfathered-in) undersized parcels (area less than 200,000 sq. ft.) adjacent to a master plan water line or a main line that provides for system looping. In this case, there are a number of grandfathered-in parcels along 66th Avenue that are "undersized"and are considered legally created. If the Board decides that an exception to Policy 5.7 is. needed, that change will require a comprehensive plan text amendment. Once such an amendment is adopted, connections would then be allowed. Those connections would then be subject to Utility Services requirements and should not result in any water line extensions or expansions above and beyond planned master plan lines or main lines that provide for system looping. Attachments: 1. E-mail Request (W 2. Potable Water Sub-Element Policy 5.7 CC. Joe Baird,County Administrator(via e-mail) Vincent Burke,Utilities Director(via e-mail) Chris Mora, Public Works Director(via e-mail) Alan S. Polackwich, Sr., County Attorney(via e-mail) Sasan Rohani,AICP(via e-mail) FACommunity 0evelopmmd\CurDev\TM3 end correspondrnoc12013\W.Davis(watcrscrvicesoutsideUSA).doc 2 240 Page 1 of 2 Stan Boling(W _ _ --_'—_-- From: Wesley S. Davis[wdavis@ircgov.com] Sent: Thursday, May 30,2013 10:14 AM To: Bob Keating;Vincent Burke;Joe Baird; Chris Mora; Stan Boling;Alan Polackwich Cc: Wesley S. Davis Subject: FW:County water services outside but near Urban Service Area Gentlemen, I received the below email. Please give me your thoughts. Thank you. Wesley S. Oavils Commissioner District 1 1801 27th Street- Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 772 226 1442 wdavis ircov.com NA Before printing this e-mail,think if it is necessary.Thunk Green! DISCLAIMER: Under Florida Law(FS668.6076),a-+nail addresses are public record. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public- records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead,contact this office by phone or in writing. From:Tom Adrean [majito;tadrean@sorensenrealestate,cQ Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 9;39 PM To:Wesley S. Davis Subject: County water services outside but near Urban Service Area Commissioner Davis,two points on the above subject: (1)it appears to me that since the County is laying water lines on 66th Ave between 8th St and 12th St, then the residents along 66th in this area should be able to connect to County water. Should bureaucracy prevail or would common sense be a better road to travel? (2)1 represent buyers and sellers in the investment/purchase of real estate in Indian River County and in doing so,not only look after their best interests but this also enables me to do business and make a living. Anything you and fellow commissioners can do to fairly address this issue will be appreciated by me,the property owners,and others. Regards,Tom Tom Adrean, MBA Realtor, GRI (W 5/30/2013 AVAt'ANE"T 241 Page 2 of 2 D S DALE SORENSEN IttA1. f•STAT@ INC.- "Exclusively Marketing Vero Beach Since 1978" Dale Sorensen Real Estate 1961 14th Ave Vero Beach, FL 32960 cell: 772.559.3369 fax: 772.539.9018 email.tadrean@sorenseiuealestate.com web: www.InvestVeroBe.ach.com 5/30/2013 242 Comprehensive Plan Potable Water Sub-Element • Level Two - whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or reduces future improvement costs, provides service to developed areas lacking full service or promotes in-fill development. • Level Three - whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within a designated service area POLICY 5.3: In order to guarantee provision of more than the minimum level of service,the county shall tape the following steps: • begin planning and preliminary design for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 5 years; • prepare plans and specifications for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 4 years; • submit a complete construction permit application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for expansion when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 3 years;and submit an application for an operation permit for the expanded facility to DEP when a plant's Average Daily Demand is projected to equal or exceed its capacity within 6 months. POLICY 5.4: The county potable water system shall continue to operate as an enterprise system which is financially self-supporting. POLICY 5.5: The county shall fund potable water capital improvements and expansions through user fees, impact fees,developer's agreements, assessments and other appropriate fees and funding mechanisms. POLICY 5.6: The county shall pursue state and federal sources of funding available for the improvement and expansion of utility services. POLICY 5.7: Consistent with the policies of the Future Land Use Element of this plan, centralized water service shall be limited to the following areas: • Areas within the Urban Service Area; • Areas where the county has legal commitments to provide facilities and services as of Community Development Department Indian River County 46 A'['-i Alun a 2 243 Comprehensive Plan Potable Water Sub-Element of the date of adoption of this plan; • Areas outside of the Urban Service Area where at least a portion of the site is contiguous to an Urban Service Area boundary as depicted on the Official Future Land Use Map. These areas are subject to the following provisions: O The maximum density of such land shall be as shown on the Official Future Land Use Map, and the provision of centralized potable water service shall not be justification for an increase in maximum density; O Potable water line extensions shall be limited to laterals and minor lines connecting land uses to main lines; and O In no case shall centralized potable water lines be permitted to extend more than 500 feet from the centerline of a roadway which is an Urban Service Area boundary,or more than 500 feet from the Urban Service boundary when the boundary is not a roadway. • Development projects located outside of the Urban Service Area that meet the criteria of the policies of the Future Land Use Element for: (W O clustering of residential development within agricultural areas; O clustering of residential development within privately owned upland conservation areas; O clustering development within mixed use districts; or O traditional neighborhood design communities. O public facilities such as public schools. O agricultural businesses and industries(including biofuel plants) • Areas where, consistent with Potable Water Sub-Element Policy 2.4, the risk of private well contamination is determined to be unacceptably high. OBJECTIVE 6 Privately Owned Public Water Plants Through the time horizon of the plan,there shall be no instances of Privately Owned Public Water Plant failures or breakdowns. POLICY 6.1: The county shall limit the use of Privately Owned Public Water Plants to areas that meet the following criteria governing connection to the county potable water system: Community Development Department Indian River County 47 ATTACHMENT 2 244 mow» IMP �! r • �rM `� t _ i off �� ti fff tf�f URI i all { � .,�__�a�E� r ��r r • �� [�� .��. 0111010tiMMNt� f fM I MftrrffrfO+W ow-0 11B � fllllf�fdf� flfMy�Mff MPfftMRE t3ifltk& �f3tftftM; Will tff tf## 9 Liat Mf6Y�fdMf egz#i Mai^ fftfi •ftff a 1111 let;•fafll;Mf iliiti f will is •i � �� *f4Aft€1� "..'1AtiMNI�,..%.►ir � 11€dIEE •f3fi7iffA€ �E$II�SMIE�MM�r,sffpid ibMMEM1R•Mt wab•Mf►1Mf f3MifRfftf� ■t ,:11P1tt R6E tN� f#f s fill It 11 1M !NI1#M Mfftxf. tfl011644fft MEfffifil �fNffIffs Mif M[fftftf�fffM€ fi®MILM NOR 6tAlifif ffft AM9114 n1 f�N�f�..aPltffffeftfif�fN ...ffft[ftf Me � ffMf f1MM wo ii#ftl6�llttIlAf n#lfti # ffffflf fff$ffnlf&fM9� 1«f#kffftf& '" MINOR kazoos #�� MfM MI#IME MfIfifllA�nEMf M!� 1�MMf ► • »,„,,,,,, � �uuwu��attrF rs�s��5fnfrwtaMarc� ar�Mnn � "� #f�M��1 i '!' L FIGURES L 303 ITEM 14.C.1 JUNE % 2013 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 11, 2013 SUBJECT: Proclamation Policy FROM: Peter D. O'Bryan, Commissioner District 4 1 would like to request the Board to consider a revision to our Proclamation policy. The recent proclamation designating Humanist Recognition Week sparked considerable debate within the community. In order to find some common ground and perhaps head off an influx of proclamation requests from a variety of religious and non-religious groups, I submit the following proposal. Instead of a variety of proclamations honoring various groups or weeks, the county would replace those with one overall proclamation honoring National Religious Freedom Day. The President of the United States annually proclaims January 16 of each year as National Religious Freedom Day. This commemorates the Virginia General Assembly's adoption of Thomas Jefferson's landmark Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom on January 16, 1786. This document led to freedom of religion for all Americans and clearly separated church from state. By honoring Jefferson's statute, the county will clearly recognize everyone's rights to their own religious belief, including those whose beliefs may be less, or non-religious, while at the same time reducing. the number of proclamations presented during meetings. 245 JUNE 18, 2013 (W ITEM 14.E.1. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: June 11, 2013 SUBJECT: Impact Fee Workshop FROM: Tim Zorc Commissioner, District 3 1 kindly request the Board of County Commissioners consideration of holding an Impact Fee Workshop to be held sometime in July 11, 2013. The purpose of the workshop would be to consider all current case law and new approaches to mobility plans, etc. L 246 DISTRICT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM (W TO: Honorable Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners THROUGH: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator f THROUGH: John King, Director of Emergency Se ces A U FROM: Brian Burkeen, Assistant Chief DATE: June 11, 2013 SUBJECT: Approval of Phase 4 Work for Fire Rescue Station 13 Site(41`Street and 43`d Avenue) It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be given formal consideration by the Emergency Services District Board of Commissioners. DESCRIPTION: On March 20, 2012, the Board approved Phase 2 of construction (erect a building for fleet maintenance for fire rescue)to the 4`h Street and 43rd Avenue site that in the future will become a new fire-rescue station.As you will recall,staff recommended commencing improvements in phases due to (W the current economic conditions. Staff is now presenting Phase 4 of improvements, which includes excavating wet retention area,installation of outfall structure and piping,install new water service and connect to existing building, clear grub and prep site for fill, rough grade the site, install sod and landscape along pond and hydro seed. These improvements are required in order to move forward with the proposed fire station. Continuing with the Board approved Professional Design/Build Services Agreement with Barth Construction;the attached summary outlines the projects and associated cost of$176,493.00. FUNDING: ITEM Amount Account Number Station 13/Phase 4 $176,493.00 10312022-066510-08006 Under the county's code, all funds collected from emergency services impact fees shall be used for the purpose of capital improvements to emergency services facilities under the jurisdiction of the county and not for maintenance or operations. The improvements included in Phase 4 are necessary to accommodate new growth and development in the county. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Phase 4 improvements as outlined. 247 ATTACHMENTS: Phase 4 Agreement with Barth Construction, Inc. Copy on file in the Board of County Commission Office APPROVED FOR AGENDA Indian River county Ap Date Administrator Legal FOR: June 18.2013 Budget BY: Risk Management Jos ph A. Baird Department ' b•ii•�3 County Administrator vilt (W 248 BARTH Construction,Inc. General Contractor CGCO07847 June 07,2013 John King Indian River County Emergency Services 4225 43 rd Avenue Vero Beach,Florida,32960 Re:Station#13 Phase IV Mr.King, We are pleased to present to you our proposal for Phase IV services for Fire Station#13 site. The scope of Phase IV is as follows; • Coordinate with Local and State agencies to partial complete the site development. • Clear,grub and prep site for fill • Excavate wet retention pond in NE comer of site • Rough grade the site in preparation for future building and paving • Haul excess material to IRC Emergency Services site at 66'"avenue and 2e street • Install outfall structure and piping,includes open road cut on 4`s Street • Install storm structure S-5 and piping into pond • Install new water service into site and connect the existing buildings,includes road cut on 4°i street. • Install sod and landscape required along the pond banks. • Hydro seed the newly filled fire station site. (W We propose to perform all of the work described above including provide project management,coordination and supervision for S 176,493.00.The costs for this phase are further clarified on the attached spreadsheet. Thank you f Jason Fykes Barth Construction,Inc. 1717 Indian River Boulevard*Suite 202A*Vero Beach,Florida 32960 Phone:(772)778-3072*Fax:(772)770-3017 E-mail: infota?baitheonstruction.com*Internet:www.baithconstruction.com G:\Projects\IRC Fire Stations 2011\IRC Fire Station#13\Phase 4 Cover Letter 6.07.13.doc 249 i4j 3 70 DAYS Sq.Footage Estimate 10 WEEKS 2 Months SU MTRACT General Conditions Barth Construction 0.00 1010 Equipment Rental 0.00 1013 Crane Rental 0.00 1020 Field Supervision 15 hours/week 200 hours 11,250 11,250 0.00 Project Management 10 hrs/week-100 Hours 10,000 10,000 0.00 Project Administartor 3 hrdweek 30 hours 1,350 1,350 0.00 Project Accounting 5/week 50 hours A 3,000 3,000 0.00 1030 Trailer Rental - - 0.00 2. 1031 Temp.Water By Owner 0.00 1032 Ternp.Power By Owner 0.00 1033 Telephone 0.00 1034 Temporary Toilet `:.sem'. ..... 300 300 0.00 1037 Temp.Road Access Cathco 1,200 1,200 0.00 1038 Project Sign 0.00 1039 Temporary Fence 0.00 1040 Field Office Supp. 0.00 1050 Temp.Protection 0.00 : ,J- 0.00 1058 First Aid 00 1059 Safet -V O.OD 0.1 0 1060 Printing I Postage 425 425 0.00 0 0 O.OD 1061 Moving&Storage 0.00 1070 PhOtDVVh koo 0.00 1090 Payroll B&B 1100 Engineering Carter 3,500 3,500 0.00 1120 Soil Testing 1,500 1,500 0.00 0.00 1125 Concrete Testing 1130 Sup vehicle 0.00 1133 Sm.Tools/Su lies ISO 150 0.00 1138 Owned Equipment 0.00 1140 Housekeeping Labor 0.00 1142 Final Cleaning 0.00 1158 Solid Waste Impact roe 0.00 1200 Surveying Carter 2,400 2.400 0.00 1205 Layout 0.00 1250 Common Labor 450 450 0.00 1260 Dump Charges 1,500 1,500 0.00 1273 As Builts In Surveying Price - ...... ...... .0.00 1300 Punch-Out Labor O.Od 1320 Builders Risk .7$0r750 750 1 1325 Liability Insurance 374 374 0.00 Cil 0 - ---- I.. ...' I -1--l- ............ 1500 Building Permit None * - - - 0.00 ?.';;n. •4{;; * - - - - 0.00 0.00 DIVISION 2 0.00 0.00 Silt fence 1500 LF 2,750 2,750 0.00 ,J.., :t,';^;:; 0.00 Clearing&Stripping Cathco 10,901 10,901 0.00 Demo Asphalt Cathco M " ;>!;:-:;;:;!;:;'3'156.: * - - 2,954 2,954 0.00 0.00 36,650 36,650 0.00 Lake Excavation On Site Rough Gradin 0.00 Storm Drainage Pipe&Structures Cathco 17,357 17,357 0.00 0.00 Water Service Cathco ': >�,r;,�,t`? w $?,; * - - 18,386 18;386 0.00 r;^•... x r i 5,-r,r. * - - - - .0.00 ` ' '`""''` " 11,773 11,773 0.00 Road Repairs Water&Storm Cathco ".h •..;�,�r=�..::~y.x773 * - - MUT Cathco ':�suei�-),;��..;jAt::;.��•" - - 1,550 1;550 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sod 25,000 SF x'=''#�' i- 'r ;t * - 4,125 4,125 0.00 HydroSeeding 55,000 SF 5,400 5,400 0.00 _Y * 0.00 "f4as:•,. w_ .w * 0.00 Fence None �:k••-:;N,:-:�• N-;:�f'- ..:,6 - - - - `F:::_•A'.>� 0.00 Landscaping 2,794 2',794 0.00 Temp Irrigation 's er * - - 750 "' 750 0.00 : ., :. .k-• ..�,A w`� t. * - 0.00 .pi,•;y;' s.yF:i; '?6`- t}C'7�i:.r`s<n,..nr: :':i.}:% ::,}l:^. .f. SUB TOTALS ,•. - �� 1� ":3:''`i}�' ,,.k.°,:99�i` 1�5;3•<539 =�`s,::<...;::.:.d•;I1ti. .•,,;.. :�:�� , ,,..:�`,:" 9.. LABOR BURDEN 7r °`-s =;'*:«"'f Sub-Total ., CEO CUT Sub Total: ..... ........ .... . Contingency 4,500 Sub-Total , P&P Bond $ 3,100.00 DB Rates Total Bid Na C.n .i --..._...._.._. ........... _.. _....._... __._.._...__..._ ._.__.._._..---—-- INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT • f�!t`YC,�� oRipA BOARD MEMORANDUM Date: June 7, 2013 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Thru: Vincent Burke, Director of Utility Services From: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal Districtm Subject: Request to Participate in the"2013 KIRB Marketplace"at Indian River Mall BACKGROUND: The Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) promotes recycling and sustainability programs in Indian River County in conjunction with the outreach and education support through Keep Indian River Beautiful (KIRB). SWDD has supported Indian River Mall Green Market series for the past two years and these events have been very successful for both SWDD & KIRB. Similarly, the Indian River Mall has offered an opportunity to promote SWDD & KIRB this summer during the 2013 KIRB Marketplace which is comprised of three separate events in June, July and August. SWDD has received the attached proposal from Indian River Mall to be the title sponsor for the upcoming event. ANALYSIS: The KIRB Marketplace starts on Saturday, June 29, 2013 from 1 pm to 6 pm. The next two events are scheduled for Saturday, July 27th and Saturday, August 28th. The general theme of the marketplace encourages reusing, recycling & upcycling in the forms of Vintage Furniture, Antiques, Works of Art, Orchids, Rain Barrels and more! KIRB will receive income from each event sub-sponsor, be able to solicit donations, promote the Reuse Center, and encourage recycling and sustainability to County residents. We may also consider distributing recycling bins at a few of the events. Overall, this is a great opportunity to promote SWDD's "Think Green Live Green" message and promote Indian River County as a Sustainable Green County. Indian River Mall will provide the venue, event planning, equipment, maintenance and marketing. Indian River Mall estimates a value to SWDD of$12,500 for the marketing of SWDD/KIRB and has requested a sponsorship of$4,000. ACCOUNT INFORMATION: le Funding for the $4,000 sponsorship is available as a sustainability item in the SWDD recycling kw account under Other Professional Services, Account No. 41125534-033190, which is funded from SWDD assessments and user fees. SWDD Agenda-Request to Participate in the 2013 KIRB Marketplace at Indian River Mall Page—1— 252 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the SWDD Board authorize participating in the 2013 KIRB Marketplace at the Indian River Mall with a sponsorship in the amount of$4,000. ATTACHMENT: 1. KIRB Marketplace Proposal from Indian River Mall APPROVED FOR AGENDA: By: 0, a.," h - <Anvd Indian River Co. Ap o ed Date Joseph K. Baird, County Administrator Administration Budget i3 Legal -C( For I Date swDo to SWDD (W (W SWDD Agenda-Request to Participate in the 2013 KIRB Marketplace at Indian River Mall Page-2- 253 r r 2013 KIRB Marketplace at Indian River Mall Vintage Furniture, Antiques, Works of Art, Orchids, Rain Barrels and more! INDIAN RIVER MALL .Y Deep Indian Raver Beautiful KI RB 1 �ri .II MV-_ .,tiy a SIMON; GROUP, INC, � r 3 Proposal for Sponsorship The Indian River Mall in collaboration with KIRB will host a series of (3) events over the summer months with the goal of promoting sustainability, environmental stewardship, and recycling education for all age groups. Each event will promote the KIRB mission, encourage shoppers to visit the reuse center, and give shoppers a great variety of interesting items to purchase! The events will target all age groups, and always have a kids arts/crafts component. • The Solid Waste Disposal District of Indian River County (title sponsor) would be included in all promotion of the event, including naming rights, print, radio, on-mall signage, digital marketing, and presence at events. • Keep Indian River Beautiful (beneficiary) will receive income from each event sub-sponsor, be able to solicit donations, promote their mall Re-Use Center and Up-cycling, and promote sustainability to Indian River County Residents. • Indian River Mall will provide the venue, event planning, equipment, maintenance and marketing. V 1 Proposal for Sponsorship SWDD will be the title sponsor and tagged as: Solid Waste Disposal District of Indian River County presents the 2013 KIRB Marketplace at Indian River Mall Media Plan: • Submission of Press Releases and Media alerts monthly to local radio and print publications, logo included ($1,000 value) • 1 ad in the Press Journal on the Friday before each event ($1,500 value) • On-Mall signage including logo on 22x28s, State Road 60 marquee, and website for 4 months ($2,000 value) • Facebook, Twitter, Text and Email Blast Campaigns promoting markets, on-going, logos and name included ($2,000 value) • (1) Sky Banner in the Indian River Mall, promoting IRCSWD and KIRB for 3 months ($3,000 value) Event Presence: • At each event, SWDD will receive a double vendor booth and be able to give out information to residents about the counties recycling program, sustainability, bin distribution, etc. KIRB will also be able to sell in vendors to the event and generate additional revenue.($3,000 value) Total Value: $12,500 SWDD Investment: $4,000 M d0�jd IS, r a r�rc 'e co INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ��Iv SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Ir f2oRio� BOARD MEMORANDUM Date: May 31, 2013 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Thru: Vincent Burke, Director of Utility Services® From: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal Districts" Subject: Work Order No.7 to Geosyntec for One Year of Groundwater Monitoring/Reporting and Related Consulting Services at the Fortner South Gifford Road Landfill BACKGROUND: In accordance with the requirements by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), the former South Gifford Road Landfill site requires continuing groundwater monitoring activities and related required regulatory activities to show that the County and SWDD are both protective of the environment and that we are proactively taking efforts to remediate the site. In 2012, FDEP reorganized their district boundaries, resulting in the site being transferred to a new FDEP District (from Central to Southeast). In a letter from the new FDEP Southeast District project manager to IRC SWDD dated March 29, 2013, FDEP approved the previous document prepared by Geosyntec for ongoing FDEP-required activities at the site and required submittal of the next semi-annual groundwater monitoring report no later than August 28, 2013 (to document results of the summer 2013 semi-annual sampling event including in the attached work order request). Additionally, in the March 29, 2013 letter, FDEP requested a written response to comments and questions regarding site activities and completion of off-site notification activities required by Florida Administrative Code Chapter 62-780. Previous sampling, reporting, and remedial events performed by Geosyntec have been completed on schedule and within budget. Accordingly, staff requested the attached proposal from Geosyntec to provide continuation of groundwater monitoring and reporting for an additional one-year period, as well as off-site notification activities for the site and annual pollution remediation liabilities evaluation. ANALYSIS: Geosyntec's proposal includes two semi-annual monitoring and reporting events for the plume monitoring well network, as well as off-site notification activities for the site and annual pollution remediation liabilities evaluation. Geosyntec's proposal consists of six main phases as follows: SWDD Agenda-Geosyntec Work Order No 7-Former South Gifford Road Landfill Groundwater Sampling Reporting Page-1— 258 Task Description Budget Phase 1: Project Management $5,949 Phase 2: Meetings/Response to FDEP Comments $8,347 Phase 3: Required Notification Activities $7,229 Phase 4:Annual Pollution Remediation Liabilities Evaluation $3,380 Phase 5:Semi-Annual Sampling Activities $54,153 Phase 6: Data Evaluation and Semi-Annual Reporting $26,068 Total $105,126 Phase 1 includes project planning and management responsibilities. Phase 2 includes preparation of a response to FDEP comments document and meeting attendance. Phase 3 includes completion of required off-site notification activities to inform nearby property owners of ongoing site activities. Phase 4 includes preparation of the annual environmental liability evaluation (including six sites) in response to Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 49 (GASB No. 49),Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations, which requires the inclusion and calculation of pollution remediation obligations. Phase 5 includes field preparation, groundwater sampling, and water level measurements (for a total of 91 wells). Phase 6 includes data evaluation and semi-annual reporting. Comparatively, the sampling and reporting portion of the current work order is within the previous level of effort provided by Geosyntec. The two additional tasks in this work order include the notification activities and annual pollution remediation liabilities evaluation, which are required by state acid federal regulations. 1 ACCOUNT INFORMATII: Funding for this work is budgeted and available in account number 31521734-033490-03004, which is the one cent sales tax fund used for infrastructure needs of the County. Costs associated with the Gaedfills are authorized uses of the once cent sales tax in addition to infrastructure. REC ATION: Staff recommends that the SWDD Board approve and authorize: the Chairman to sign the attached Work Order No. 7 authorizing Geosyntec to provide groundwater monitoring/reporting and related consulting services for the Former Gifford Road Landfill in compliance with FDEP requirements for a period of one year not to exceed fee of$105,126. ATTACHMENT: Geosyntec Work Order No. 7 APPROVED FOR AGENDA: �� Indian River Co. Approved Date By* Itl Administration Joseph h. Baird, County Administrator Budget Mr Wr3' K. Legal 6 l7 For: D 094 SWDD 6 u l Date SWDD SWDD Agenda-Geosyntec Work Order No 7-Former South Gifford Road Landfill Groundwater Sampling Reporting Page-2— 259 WORK ORDER NUMBER 7 This Work Order Number 7 is entered into as of this day of 20 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15, 2011 (the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. ("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1 (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 1 (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 1 (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth here-i-n. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (W Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: By: Chairman Title: Principal BCC Approved Date: Attest:Jeffrey R.Smith,Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: A �A. ,County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ro, Alan S: Polackwich .,County Attorney 260 EXHIBIT 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES engineers I scientists I innovators 261 6770 South Washington Geosynteccl Avenue,Suite 3 Titusville,Florida 32780 PH 321.269.5880 C, consultants FAX 321.269.5813 www.geosyntee.com 19 April 2013 Mr.Himanshu H. Mehta,P.E. Managing Director Solid Waste Disposal District Indian River County 1325 74th Avenue SW Vero Beach,Florida 32968 Subject: Proposal to Provide One Year of Groundwater Monitoring/Reporting and Related Consulting Services Former South Gifford Road Landfill Vero Beach,Indian River County,Florida Dear Mr. Mehta: Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) is pleased to submit this letter proposal to the Indian River County (IRC) Solid Waste Disposal District(SWDD)to provide professional services associated with FDEP-required activities associated with continued implementation of the groundwater (W monitoring for the chlorinated volatile organic compound (CVOC) plume at the Former South Gifford Road Landfill located in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida. This fee proposal is based on correspondence with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and discussions with IRC. As requested by IRC, this fee proposal includes budget to complete two semi-annual monitoring and reporting events for the plume monitoring well network, as well as related consulting services to respond to FDEP correspondence and prepare an annual pollution liabilities evaluation report for all County-owned environmental liabilities. Geosyntec has prepared this proposal (professional services as Exhibit 1) as Work Order No. 6 for the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services between IRC SWDD and Geosyntec, dated 15 November 2011. The remainder of this letter provides an overview of the project background, a description of the proposed scope of work, a budget estimate, and a discussion of the schedule for accomplishment of the work described herein. PROJECT BACKGROUND As part of the long-term monitoring activities for the identified CVOC plume associated with the South Gifford Road Landfill, a network of monitoring wells will require sampling on an annual or semi-annual basis to: (i) confirm that the CVOC plume is not migrating by monitoring the lateral and vertical extent; (ii) evaluate the impact of source and dissolved plume bioremediation to assess CVOC plume centerline concentrations over time; and (iii) assess the impact of biological and physical natural attenuation processes on CVOC plume degradation. XR13056\PR13006 041713.docx engineers I scientists I innovators 262 Mr.Himanshu H. Mehta,P.E. 19 April 2013 Page 2 PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK The proposed scope of work consists of semi-annual groundwater monitoring and reporting and related activities to be performed on behalf of IRC SWDD at the Former South Gifford Road Landfill. For the purpose of budgeting, the scope of work has been divided into the following phases: • Phase 1 —Project Management; • Phase 2—Meetings/Response to FDEP Comments; • Phase 3—Required Notification Activities; • Phase 4—Annual Pollution Remediation Liabilities Evaluation; • Phase 5—Semi-Annual Sampling Activities; and • Phase 6—Data Evaluation and Semi-Annual Reporting. The remainder of this section presents a general description of the activities to be performed in each phase. (W Phase 1—Proiect Management Under this task, Geosyntec will perform project planning and management responsibilities, such as correspondence with IRC SWDD and FDEP, invoice review,project coordination, and project administration. The budget includes two hours per month for the project manager over a 12- month project duration and two hours per sampling/field event has been included for the principal-in-charge. Phase 2—Meetings/Response to FDEP Comments Under this task, Geosyntec will prepare for and attend up to two meetings, with IRC SWDD, FDEP,and/or IRC Board of County Commission,as necessary. It is anticipated that one of these meetings may include preparation of a presentation of the evaluation of redevelopment options prepared by Geosyntec under a previous authorization. The site has recently been transferred to a new FDEP District(from Central to Southeast). FDEP provided comments on the last semi-annual groundwater monitoring report in a letter dated 29 March 2013, which requested a written response to their comments and questions by 2 June 2013. Most of the comments are related to clarification for the new FDEP project manager. Under this task, Geosyntec will prepare and submit the response to FDEP comments on the December 2012 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report. XR13056TR13006_041713.docx engineers i Scientists I innovators 263 Mr.Himanshu H. Mehta,P.E. 19 April 2013 (W Page 3 Phase 3—Required Notification Activities FDEP requested in their 29 March 2013 letter that the County establish a temporary point of compliance (TPOC) beyond the property boundary of the landfill, as required by Rule 62- 780.220. Under this task, Geosyntec will complete the activities required to establish the temporary extension of the TPOC, including: (i)preparing a notification package (i.e.,to provide written notice in accordance with Rule 62-780.220(3)) to the County Health Department and all real property owners into which the point of compliance is allowed to extend); (ii) assisting IRC SWDD with preparation of the notice to be published (by IRC SWDD), as required, in a standard-size newspaper of general circulation; and (iii) providing copies of notices, to FDEP to document completion of the process. Phase 4—Annual Pollution Remediation Liabilities Evaluation As requested by IRC SWDD, under this task, Geosyntec will prepare the annual environmental liability evaluation. This document is prepared annually in response to Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 49 (GASB No. 49), Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pollution Remediation Obligations,which requires the inclusion and calculation of pollution remediation obligations. The objective of GASB No. 49 is to enhance the usefulness and comparability of pollution remediation obligation information reported by state and local governments. It has been assumed that the report will include the evaluation of six sites, including South Gifford Road Closed Landfill (4701 41"` Street), Old Administration Building (1840 25d' Street), Former Cattle Dip Site (9255 93rd Street), North County Reverse Osmosis Plant(7751 58h Avenue), and Shadowbrook Estates (7775 85d' Street) . Phase 5—Field Activities Under this task, Geosyntec will perform all field activities related to the plume groundwater monitoring, as discussed herein. The field activities will include field preparation, groundwater sampling, and water level measurements. Field preparation activities will include scheduling and staffing, subcontracting,coordination with the analytical laboratory, field equipment preparation, and notifying FDEP and Vero Beach Municipal Airport of the field schedule. Geosyntec will perform the groundwater sampling activities associated with the CVOC plume monitoring wells. With FDEP's approval for use of Geosyntec-recommended Passive Diffusion Bag(PDB) Samplers,the sampling activities will be completed in less time than previous events that have been performed with traditional low-flow sampling techniques. A minimum of two weeks prior to the summer semi-annual sampling event, Geosyntec personnel will deploy the PDBs in wells proposed for sampling using this technique (i.e., wells that are at least 1-in diameter and are being sampled only for volatile organic constituents [VOCs]). PDBs are anticipated to be purchased from ALS Group, one of the few suppliers of this type of passive XR13056\PR13006 041713.docx engineers I scientists I innovators 264 Mr.Himanshu H.Mehta,P.E. 19 April 2013 Page 4 sampling device and the only analytical laboratory that supplies them. This effort is anticipated to be completed by one field person within one day. PDBs for subsequent events will be deployed after each of the semi-annual sampling events are completed to save an additional mobilization (e.g. the PDBs to be sampled during the winter 2013 sampling event will be deployed during the summer 2013 event after sampling activities are completed). Groundwater sampling activities will be executed using a two-person sampling crew and will be performed in general accordance with the FDEP Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS). The proposed annual field event will be conducted in summer 2013 (tentatively in June) and will include sampling of 62 monitoring wells (41 wells using PDBs and 21 wells with traditional sampling techniques). The annual field event is budgeted to include one day for PDB deployment(as a separate mobilization at least 14 days prior to sample collection),three days for groundwater sampling activities, and one day for PDB deployment for the next sampling event (total of five field days). The proposed semi-annual field event will be conducted in winter 2013 (tentatively in December) and will include sampling of 29 monitoring wells (12 wells using PDBs and 17 wells with traditional sampling techniques). The semi-annual field event is budgeted to include two days for groundwater sampling activities and one day for PDB deployment for the next sampling event(total of three days). Consistent field documentation and (W field protocols will be utilized to develop reliable data to support the natural attenuation of the groundwater plume. The groundwater samples will be analyzed in accordance with the sampling plan summarized in Table 9 of the December 2012 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report. In addition,three samples will be analyzed for Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), sodium, chloride, and bromide, in follow-up to the injection activities completed in 2012,as requested by FDEP. Geosyntec will conduct a complete round of groundwater level measurements coincident with each semi-annual groundwater sampling event(budgeted for one day with two-person field team for each event). Depth to groundwater measurements will be recorded to the nearest 0.01-ft in each monitoring well, including existing monitoring wells and applicable City of Vero Beach wells(assumed up to 88 wells). It is anticipated that purge water (investigation-derived waste [IDW]) will be treated in the existing air stripper sump (using a temporarily connected air compressor) and discharged to the sanitary sewer following treatment. No costs are included herein for IDW disposal or analytical costs. XR13056\PR13006 041713.docx engineers I scientists I innovators 265 Mr.Himanshu H.Mehta,P.E. 19 April 2013 Page 5 Phase 6—Data Evaluation and Semi-Annual Reporting Under this task, Geosyntec will perform data evaluation activities and prepare semi-annual reports for submittal to FDEP. Data evaluation activities will include database management, data evaluation and screening, geographical information systems (GIS) figure preparation, time trend analyses, and/or statistical data analyses. The results of groundwater sampling associated with the CVOC plume monitoring will be presented in a report supported by attachments containing Chain-of-Custody sheets, field notes and observations, water sampling logs, maps, graphs, analytical results, and any other applicable materials. The draft reports will be submitted to IRC SWDD for review prior to submittal to FDEP. Each final semi-annual report will be signed and sealed by a Florida registered professional engineer or geologist. SCHEDULE Geosyntec will conduct the groundwater monitoring and reporting activities on a semi-annual basis as described herein. The response to comments on the last report is due to FDEP by 2 June 2013. The semi-annual groundwater monitoring events will be tentatively conducted in June and December 2013. BUDGET ESTIMATE A budget estimate for the scope of work outlined in Phases 1 through 6 of this proposal is summarized in the following table, and a detailed budget estimate is provided as Attachment A. The budget estimate presented in this proposal is,based on Geosyntec's understanding of the project requirements, our experience gained from executing similar tasks for SWDD since 2002 at the site, and experience with groundwater monitoring and reporting activities at similar facilities. Geosyntec will not exceed the budget estimate without prior approval and written authorization from IRC SWDD. Phase 1 —Project Management $5,949 Phase 2—Meetings/Response to FDEP Comments $8,347 Phase 3 —Required Notification Activities $7,229 Phase 4—Annual Pollution Remediation Liabilities Evaluation $3,380 Phase 5 —Semi-Annual Sampling Activities $54,153 Phase 6—Data Evaluation and Semi-Annual Reporting $26,068 TOTAL $105,126 XR13056TR13006 041713.docx engineers I scientists I innovators 266 Mr.Himanshu H.Mehta, P.E. 19 April 2013 Page 6 CLOSURE Geosyntec appreciates this opportunity to offer our services. If this proposal is acceptable, please indicate your agreement by signing the attached work authorization, which references this proposal. Please return one signed work authorization to Ms. Johnson's attention. Please call either of the undersigned with questions you may have as you review this proposal. Sincerely, )�Ia W ' ill Johnson,P.G. Senior Hydrogeologist J s L nbach,P.E.,BCEE Principal Engineer Attachments (W XR13056TRI3006_041713.docx engineers I scientists I innovators 267 ATTACHMENT A (w BUDGET ESTIMATE engineers 1 scientists I innovators 268 (aw Table 1 APRIL 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATE SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL PHASE 1:Project Management ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED BUDGET Principal hr $212 4 $848 Senior Project Geologist hr $176 1 24 $4,224 Subtotal Professional Services $5,072 Technical/Administrative Assistant hr $88 8 $704 Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $704 Communications Fee 3%labor 0.03 5,776 $173 Su4tot1 Reimbursabl $173 PR13006 04012013.xlsx Geosyntec Consultants 269 Table 2 APRIL 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATE SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL PHASE 2:Meetings/Response to FDEP Comments ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED BUDGET Principal hr $212 10 $2,120 Senior Project Geologist hr $176 34 $5,984 Subtotal Professional Services $8,104 Communications Fee 3%labor 0.03 8,104 $243 Subtotal Reimbursable $243 (uw PR13006_04012013.xlsx Geosptec Consultants 270 Table 3 APRIL 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATE SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL PHASE 3:Required Notification Activities ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED BUDGET Principal hr $212 4 $848 Senior Project Geologist hr $176 4 $704 Geologist ' hr $126 32 $4,032 Staff Geologist hr $94 0 $0 Subtotal Professional Services $5,584 Designer/GIS hr $129 8 $1,032 Clerical hr $54 4 $216 Subtotal TeehnicallAdministrative Services $1,248 Lodging day $89 0 $0 Per Diem day $51 0 $0 Communications Fee 3%labor 0.03 6,832 $205 CADD Computer System hr $15 8 $120 Vehicle Rental day $75 0 $0 8.5"x11"Photocopies each $0.12 400 $48 Second Day Letter each $6 4 $24 Subtotal Reimbursabl $397 3 PR13006_04012013.xlsx Geosyntec Consultants 271 Table 4 APRIL 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATE SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL PHASE 4:Annual Pollution Remediation Liabilities Evaluation ITEM TBASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED BUDGET jillIVIVE 110g; 11 ;11 Principal hr $212 4 $848 Senior Project Geologist hr $176 0 $0 Senior Staff Engineer hr $111 16 $1,776 Subtotal Professional Services $2,624 Designer/GIS hr $129 2 $258 Clerical hr $54 6 $324 Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $582 Communications Fee 3%labor 0.03 3,206 $96 CADD Computer System hr $15 2 $30 8.5"x11"Photocopies each $0.12 400 $48 Subtotal Reimbursable $174 (W (w PR13006 04012013YJsx Geosyntec Consultants 272 Table 5 APRIL 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATE SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL PHASE 5:Semi-Annual Sam ling Activities EITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY I;BU;DGET ED d Senior Project Geologist hr $176 4 Geologist hr $126 24 $3,024 Staff Geologist hr $94 150 $14,100 Subtotal Professional Services $17,828 Site Manager/Construction Manager hr $107 150 $16,050 Subtotal Technical/Administrative Services $16,050 L>llwa-1 ry Apa_yt sis for VOCs each $75 93 $6,966 Laboratory Analysis for TOC each $16 6 $96 Laboratory Analysis for Dissolved Gases each $96 25 $2,408 Laboratory Analysis for 1,4-Dioxane each $107 1 $107 Laboratory Analysis for Dhc each $305 4 $1,220 Laboratory Analysis for vcrA each $144 4 $578 Laboratory Analysis for TRPH each $54 6 $321 Laboratory Analysis for sodium each $15 6 $90 Laboratory Analysis for chloride/bromide each $17 6 $103 Laboratory Analysis for TDS each $11 6 $64 Subtotal Subcontractor Services $11,952 �r PDBs-Field Ready each $30.50 94 $2,867 Lodging day $89 10 $890 Per Diem day $51 10 $510 Communications Fee 3%labor 0.03 $33,878 $1,016 Field Vehicle day $97 10 $970 8.5"x11"Photocopies each $0.12 100 $12 Overnight Cooler each $95 2 $190 Groundwater Sampling Kit day $275 6 $1,650 Water Level Measurement Kit day $55 2 $110 Equipment Shipping each $54 2 $108 Subtotal Reimbursables $8,323 Notes: 1. Lodging and per diem rates were taken from the GSA website for the Vero Beach area(www.gsa.gov). 2. Groundwater Sampling Kit includes:water level indicator,oil/water!robe,peristaltic or bladder pump,multi-meter(pH,temperature, conductivity,turbidity,dissolved oxygen,and oxidation reduction potential),tubing,and miscellaneous supplies. 3.Water Level Measurement Kit includes:water level indicator and miscellaneous field supplies. PR13006 04012013.xlsx Geosyntec Consultants 273 Table 6 APRIL 2013 BUDGET ESTIMATE SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL PHASE 6:Data Evaluation and Semi-Annual Report n ITEM BASIS RATE QUANTITY ESTIMATED BUDGET a Principal hr $212 8 $1,696 Senior Project Geologist hr $176 24 $4,224 Geologist hr $126 60 $7,560 _ Staff Geologist hr $94 40 $3,760 Subtotal Professional Services $17,240 Designer/GIS hr $126 48 $6,048 Technical/Administrative Assistant hr $88 12 $1,056 Subtotal Tech nical/Administrative Services $7,104 Communications Fee 3%labor 0.03 $24,344 $730 CADD Computer System hr $15 48 $720 8.5'x11"Photocopies each $0.12 1,080 $130 CADD Photocopies each $3 48 $144 Subtotal Reimbursable $1,724 (W PR13006 04012013.xlsx Geosyntee Consultants 274 eco INDIAN RIVER COUNTY �g1VF`R� - 4 11 A �. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT I,z oRioA BOARD MEMORANDUM Date: May 29, 2013 To: Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Thru: Vincent Burke, Director of Utility Service From: Himanshu H. Mehta, P.E., Managing Director, Solid Waste Disposal District ,^, Subject: Final Pay for Geosyntec Work Order No.5&Redevelopment Plan Presentation —Former Gifford Road Landfill BACKGROUND: On July 17, 2012, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) Board approved Work Order No. 5 to Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec) to provide Ground Monitoring and Reporting services for the Indian River County South Gifford Road Landfill Site. The authorization was executed with a not to exceed budget of $110,765.00 and the following scope of work: Project Management, Well Maintenance, Field Activities, Data Evaluation and Semi- Annual Reporting, Site Master Planning& Pollution Evaluation Reporting. ANALYSIS: Geosyntec has completed satisfactory all the assignments described in the scope of work for a total invoiced amount, including the final invoice, of$448:44. After final payment, the total amount paid to Geosyntec will be $110,763.33 which is under the approved budget. Attached is Geosyntec letter report describing in more details the services provided under each task. As part of this work order, Geosyntec prepared an evaluation of site redevelopment options with the objective of evaluating potential end use options for the site, including end uses potentially beneficial to SWDD & the County. Specifically, the focus was on 1) Greenspace / Recreational 2) Municipal Enhancements and 3) Commercial / Light Industrial. A copy of Geosyntec's report is provided as an attachment. Each option offers benefits; however, there are more details that would need to be evaluated as well as the potential costs in order to determine the best end use for the site. Staff requests planning input from the Board as well as approval to seek out grants and other applicable funding options that will align with the board's preferred future land use. Staff recommends the consideration for a community stakeholder meeting to further define the direction of these options. ACCOUNT INFORMATION: Funding for this work is budgeted and available in account number 31521734-033490-03004, which is the one cent sales tax fund used for infrastructure needs of the County. SWDD AGENDA Final Pay Geosyntec WO#5&Redevelopment Presentation Page-1— 275 . ....._ ... . .. RECOMMENDATION: SWDD staff recommends that its Board approve and/or provide guidance on the following: 1. Approve for payment Geosyntec final invoice in the amount of$448.44. 2. Input on Board's preferred future land use options, i.e. 1) Greenspace/Recreational 2) Municipal Enhancements and 3) Commercial/Light Industrial. 3. Authorize Staff to seek out grants and other funding options. 4. Authorize Staff to organize a Community Stakeholder's meeting. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Geosyntec Project Completion Report& Final Invoice (10 Pages) 2. Geosyntec's Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options (30 Pages) APPROVED FOR AGENDA: Indian River Co. Approved Date By: (� Administration (13T I-3 seph . Baird, County Administrator Budget 12 Legal �- I �I3 For: Q SWDD u! 13 (W Date SWDD ..tt..b SWDD AGENDA Final Pay Geosyntec WOO&Redevelopment Presentation 276 Page-2— Prepared for: Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District 1325 74th Avenue Southwest Vero Beach, Florida 32968 EVALUATION OF SITE REDEVELOPMENT OPTIONS SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD LANDFILL (W Prepared by: Geosynte& consultants engineers I scientists I innovators Geosyntec Consultants Project Number FR0766F May 2013 277 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Terms of Reference................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Document Overview.......................................................................... 1 1.3 Document Organization......................................................................................... 1 2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY.......................................................................3 2.1 Site Description and Background ..........................................................................3 2.2 Summary of Previous Site Investigations..............................................................3 3. LAND USE PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS........................................................... 5 3.1 Demographics and Property Valuation..................................................................5 3.2 Surrounding Land Use........................................................................................... 5 3.3 Zoning and Future Land Use..................................................................................6 4. GENERAL REDEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR LANDFILLS..............8 4.1 Overview................................................................................................................8 4.2 Human Health and Environmental Impacts...........................................................9 4.2.1 Human Intrusion/Contact..............................................................................9 4.2.2 Ecological Exposure/Considerations.............................................................9 4.2.3 Gas Migration................................................................................................9 4.2.4 Groundwater Impacts.................................................................................. 10 4.3 Foundation/Subgrade Performance...................................................................... 10 4.4 Surface-Water Management................................................................................. 12 4.5 Long-Term Stewardship ...................................................................................... 12 5. TECHNICAL ISSUES AFFECTING REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE.............. 14 5.1 Overview.............................................................................................................. 14 5.2 Landfill Gas.......................................................................................................... 15 5.3 Groundwater/Leachate....................................................................................... 15 5.4 Surface Water....................................................................................................... 17 FR0766F/PR13012_20130603.docx i May 2013 278 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 5.5 Waste Decomposition and Settlement................................................................. 17 5.6 Long-Term Stewardship ...................................................................................... 17 6. SITE-SPECIFIC REDEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES........................................ 18 6.1 Overview.............................................................................................................. 18 6.2 Greenspace/Recreational...................................................................................... 18 6.3 Municipal.............................................................................................................20 6.4 Commercial/Light Industrial................................................................................20 7. CONCLUSIONS..........................................................................................................22 7.1 Potential Data Gaps..............................................................................................22 7.2 Cost Considerations .............................................................................................22 7.3 Summary..............................................................................................................22 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Summary of 2012 Demographic Statistics Table 2 Technical Considerations for Potential Site Redevelopment Alternatives for the Former South Gifford Road Landfill LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Map Figure 2 Surrounding Land Use Y 2013 May FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 11 279 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BLS Below Land Surface CAR Climate Action Reserve C/I Commercial/Industrial cis-1,2-DCE cis-1,2-Dichloroethene CVOC Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compound FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection ft Feet Geosyntec Geosyntec Consultants GHG Greenhouse Gas GIS Geographic Information Systems GROW Giving Rewarding Opportunities to Work IP&T Interim Pump and Treat IRC Indian River County LFG Landfill Gas MSW Municipal Solid Waste Muni Municipal NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System O&M Operations and Management RAP Remedial Action Plan RCRA Resource Conservation Recovery Act RPZ Runway Protection Zone SJRWMD St. John's River Water Management District SWDD Solid Waste Disposal District TCE Trichloroethene VOC Volatile Organic Compound FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx Hi May 2013 280 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Terms of Reference This Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options for the South Gifford Road Landfill (Site) (COM_124400) located in Indian River County (IRC), Florida and has been prepared for the IRC Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD) by Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec). The work was performed on behalf of IRC SWDD in accordance with Work Order No. 5 under the Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services between IRC SWDD and Geosyntec, dated 15 November 2011. Preliminary discussions were held with IRC to focus to scope of the evaluation provided herein. 1.2 Purpose and Document Overview The purpose of this document is to evaluate potential end use options for redevelopment of the closed South Gifford Road Landfill and identify potential benefits, drawbacks, and considerations for each option. There are multiple potential stakeholders that have a vested interest in a potential redevelopment project for the Site, including area residents, IRC SWDD and the County overall, City of Vero Beach Municipal Airport, local chamber of commerce(s), and political representatives. This effort is intended to provide a base of information from which the potential stakeholders can evaluate the best end use option for (W this property. This document provides a summary of land use planning considerations for the Site, general considerations for redevelopment of a typical municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill, as well as redevelopment challenges related specifically to the Site. In general, redevelopment options for former landfills include the following options: (i) greenspace/recreational; (ii) commercial/light industrial; (iii) municipal; and (iv) residential land uses. However, based on discussions with IRC SWDD and a preliminary screening of the above options for the Site, the following viable options are further evaluated herein: (i) greenspace/recreational; (ii) commercial/light industrial; and (iii) municipal (i.e., enhancement to current land use). General discussion about the options is provided, including technical considerations, and potential advantages and disadvantages of the various options; however, specific recommendations are not included herein. Additional data requirements needed to better evaluate the feasibility of the various redevelopment options are also discussed. 1.3 Document Organization The remainder of this document is divided into the following sections: • Section 2 presents a description of the site, overview of site history, and summary of previous site investigations; FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 1 May 2013 281 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida • Section 3 discusses land use planning considerations, including demographics, surrounding land use, and zoning and future land use; • Section 4 discusses general redevelopment considerations for landfills, such as human health and environmental impacts, foundation and subgrade performance, surface- water management, and long-term stewardship of the site; • Section 5 discusses technical issues affecting redevelopment, including landfill gas, groundwater and leachate, surface water, waste decomposition and settlement, and long-term stewardship; • Section 6 presents site specific redevelopment alternatives for the former South Gifford Road Landfill; and • Section 7 presents conclusions, including potential data gaps, cost considerations, and a summary. FR0766F/PR13012May 2 Y 2013 282 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY 2.1 Site Description and Background The Site is located in east-central IRC and comprises approximately 115 acres of land with South Gifford Road(40 Street) bordering the landfill to the north while various commercial, industrial, and undeveloped areas border the remainder of the Site. The northern portion (approximately 55 acres) of the Site is owned by IRC and the southern portion (approximately 60 acres) is owned by the City of Vero Beach. A site plan for the South Gifford Road Landfill is presented as Figure 1. Based on historical documents, commercial, industrial, residential, and agricultural wastes were disposed of at the landfill from approximately 1960 until 1977. Records indicate that the waste cells were excavated to approximately eight feet(ft)below the original land surface grade; however, interview with onsite workers indicate that, in some areas, the waste cells may have extended more than ten ft below land surface (BLS), within the water table. The waste cells varied in length from 200 to 500 ft. Waste disposal activities were terminated in August 1977, and the final landfill cover, which was comprised of approximately two ft of clean fill material, was constructed in 1978. Pine (W foliage was planted in various areas of the site in 1979. A 2008 aerial view of the Site is provided on Figure 1. 2.2 Summary of Previous Site Investigations A source assessment investigation was initiated in 1999, after volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were discovered in groundwater. An Interim Pump and Treat (IP&T) system was installed to provide hydraulic containment of the high concentration area of the dissolved groundwater plume and groundwater monitoring activities were initiated in December 2002. A Remedial Action Plan(RAP) was developed in July 2003,concurrent with the groundwater monitoring activities and IP&T system operation. The RAP outlined a proposed remedy for the VOC-impacted area of the Site, including aggressive source removal, expansion of the existing IP&T system, construction of an infiltration gallery for effluent re-injection, and monitored natural attenuation for the downgradient dissolved plume. Source removal activities were conducted from May through October 2004, and resulted in the removal of approximately 800 to 1,200 lbs of trichloroethene (TCE) from the source area via the excavation, and an additional 80 lbs of TCE, 73 lbs of cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE), and 2 lbs of vinyl chloride via the dewatering system. Enhanced bioremediation injection activities were completed in 2008 and 2012 and long-term groundwater monitoring to monitor progress of monitored natural attenuation is ongoing at the Site. The current remedial strategy for the Site is a passive solution, which relies on the in situ biological degradation of VOCs. While the time to ultimately achieve cleanup standards using this approach is extended, the FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 3 May 2013 283 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida approach avoids the considerable costs associated with a more aggressive treatment system with mechanical components(such as plume-wide air sparging or pump and treat). (41.1 FR0766F/PRI3012 20130603.doex 4 May 2013 284 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 3. LAND USE PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 Demographics and Property Valuation The population in IRC in 2012 was estimated at 140,567 (Table 1). Over 60% of the population in IRC resides in unincorporated areas of the county, such as the Gifford community, which encompasses approximately three and one-half square miles around the Site. Median value of owner-occupied housing units in IRC was estimated at$179,300, about 5% lower than the statewide average in 20121. Demographic information and indicator parameters are summarized in Table 1. Currently, several private non-profit organizations, as well as governmental educational agencies, are working to bring businesses to the surrounding community and/or offer services intended to increase the employability of residents. For example, GROW(Giving Rewarding Opportunities to Work) is a local community-based organization specializing in providing young adults with comprehensive employment training and meaningful work experience opportunities. Redevelopment plans should take the surrounding demographics into account to better meet the needs of the local community. Table 1. Summary of 2012 Demographic Statistics) 0( nn� g ,. Population 140,567 %25 &older High School Graduate and Higher 86.9 Median Household Income $46,363 Per Capita Income $31,732 %Persons below poverty level 13.4 % 19 years or younger 18.6 %20 to 59 years 53.8 %65 years or older 27.6 3.2 Surrounding Land Use The Site is bordered to the north by South Gifford Road (41St Street). Residential properties are located north of South Gifford Road to the north and northwest of the Site. Municipal parcels, including the IRC Road and Bridge Department and IRC School Board, are located t United States Census Bureau-http://quickfacts.census.gov/gfd/states/12/12061.html(Accessed 1 April 2013). FR0766F/PR13012_20130603.docx 5 May 2013 285 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 (W South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida northeast of the Site. Municipal and commercial facilities, including a UPS Customer Center, City of Vero Beach Police Firing Range, and the City of Vero Beach Municipal Airport border the Site to the east and south. A combination of municipal and undeveloped parcels borders the Site to the west. Geosyntec obtained and incorporated parcel and current land use information from IRC Property Appraiser's Office and the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Department. A map showing current land use for properties within a 1-mile radius of the Site is provided as Figure 2. Online searches and an aerial photography review were conducted in March 2013 to evaluate current surrounding land use within 1.5-mile (area immediately accessible to the Site) and E- mile (approximately twice the size of the Gifford community, in which the Site is located) radii of the Site. According to the IRC Parks Division website, one community park was identified within a 1.5-mile radius of the Site. Additionally, there are approximately five community parks, two sports complexes or recreational facilities, six golf courses, and one industrial park within a 6-mile radius of the Site. 3.3 Zoning and Future Land Use The Site is zoned as a Light Industrial District, which means that the area is "intended to provide opportunities for limited manufacturing and industrial uses and to promote the (W establishment of employment centers which are accessible to urban services and facilities, the area labor force, and local industrial and business markets while minimizing the potential for any adverse impacts upon nearby properties."2 Typical land uses in this type of district include certain types of agriculture, commercial, personal services, auto repair services, parking, miscellaneous repairs, wholesale trade, eating and drinking establishments, marine- related commercial activities, industrial, transportation and utilities, and transportation services. Section IX, Chapter 911 — Zoning, from the IRC, Florida Code of Ordinances are available online at hqp://Iibrary.municode.com/index.aspx?clientld=12232. An additional zoning consideration for the Site pertains to the area located in approximately 11.5 acres in the southern portion of the Site (owned by the City of Vero Beach), currently designated as a Runway Protection Zone (RPZ), which limits the use of this area (Figure 1). Mr. Eric Menger, Airport Director, with the City of Vero Beach Municipal Airport, was contacted during this effort to discuss the objective of the evaluation and potential redevelopment options being considered for the Site. Due to the RPZ, any changes to the use of this area, which is currently undeveloped, would need approval by the City of Vero Beach Municipal Airport and the National Airport Planning and Environmental Division, APP-400, as such, ongoing communication with the City of Vero Beach Municipal Airport should be 2 IRC.2012.Florida Code of References,Section IX,Chapter 911—Zoning. FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.doex 6 May 2013 286 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida maintained as redevelopment options are considered due to certain restrictions and approval requirements. Examples of development that would require approval include, but are not limited to, the following: buildings and structures, recreational land use (golf courses, sports fields, amusement parks, other places of public assembly), transportation facilities (rail facilities, public roads/highways, vehicular parking facilities), fuel storage facilities (above and below ground), hazardous material storage (above and below ground), wastewater treatment facilities, and above-ground utility infrastructure (i.e. electrical substations), including any type of solar panel installations. Care must also be taken to not attract wildlife, mainly birds,to the area since that would increase the risk of bird-related aviation accidents. The Site is designated Commercial/Industrial (C/I) and Municipal (Muni) on the 2030 Indian River County Figure Land Use Map, adopted 12 October 2010 and revised 6 November 2012 (www.irccdd.com/ZoningMaps/Color/spc/Color/spc-comppl�). (W FR0766F/PR13012_20130603.doex 7 May 2013 287 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 4. GENERAL REDEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR LANDFILLS 4.1 Overview There are more than 2,500 active landfills in the United States that accept MSW and over 17,000 closed landfills that no longer accept waste. In addition to these "known" landfills, there are thousands of unregulated historic "dump" sites that are often discovered when a developer initiates construction. Often these sites were old borrow pits or low-lying areas that were filled to grade to blend in with the surrounding topography and vegetation. Public and private landfill owners face the same issues associated with these discovered historic dump sites, as well as engineered landfills: idle assets, long-term maintenance costs, environmental liabilities (known and unknown), and limited options for sale or reuse. Until recently, most landfill owners have managed closed landfill sites by isolation (fencing and preventing public access) and complying with environmental issues as problems arose. However, because of changing public perception, increased scarcity of land, and creation and growth of redevelopment programs (such as the Florida Brownfields Program), landfill sites are being considered for redevelopment. Other reasons for redeveloping a landfill site may be related to: • cost(e.g., discounted property value or tax and development fee concessions); (W • sustainable development initiatives that include programs which encourage beneficial use of`Brownfield" sites or preservation of"virgin" (undeveloped)properties; • long-term stewardship (by redeveloping a landfill site, the owner may be able to raise revenue for long-term care or transfer the long-term care responsibility to another party); and • restoring or improving the aesthetic value of the property. There are many factors that influence redevelopment of closed landfills, including the size of the site, the contamination extent, the waste type (e.g., MSW, hazardous, construction/demolition debris), site location, presence of wetlands or open water bodies, use of recyclable materials for remediation and development purposes, land value, developer willingness, regulatory agency policies/rules, engineering solutions, and financial incentives. In the past few decades, legislation has been adopted that encourages reuse of Brownfield sites, including landfills. In addition, there are financial incentives and various grant programs for redevelopment of this type of site. Furthermore, insurance companies have developed risk management tools (including environmental policies to limit liability) and financial institutions are offering financing for Brownfield sites that make redevelopment of impaired properties more plausible. In addition, there are grant programs related to specific site redevelopments options, such as green or alternative energy(i.e., solar farms). FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 8 May 2013 288 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida Redevelopment alternatives were discussed in the previous section. The issues or concerns that affect redevelopment of landfill sites can be grouped into four categories: (i) human health and environmental impacts; (ii) foundation/subgrade performance; (iii) surface-water management; and(iv) long-term stewardship. These issues are further discussed below. 4.2 Human Health and Environmental Impacts 4.2.1 Human IntrusionlContact Both during and after redevelopment, there is the potential for humans to be exposed to surface soils/debris/waste, as well as subsurface materials (especially during construction where grading or waste relocation is occurring). Exposure issues during construction are often addressed by utilizing dust suppression methods. Long-term exposure issues are often addressed by biotic/mechanical barriers(e.g., capping). 4.2.2 Ecological ExposurelConsiderations Ecological receptors can be exposed to surface soils/debris and subsurface materials (burrowing). Exposure issues are often addressed by biotic/mechanical barriers (e.g., capping with a biointrusion barrier layer). In order to mitigate long-term impacts to ecological receptors, especially endangered or potentially endangered species, an ecological risk assessment should be conducted. 4.2.3 Gas Migration Landfill gas (LFG) is created when organic materials decompose under anaerobic conditions. LFG is typically composed of methane (50 to 55%), carbon dioxide (45 to 500/6), and trace amounts of other gases (e.g., oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen sulfide). LFG migrates within the subsurface, ultimately discharging to the atmosphere. If left uncontrolled, LFG can cause odor, safety concerns (explosion or death by asphyxiation), and environmental problems. The gas is typically managed by: (i) source control (gas collection and treatment or landfill remediation); and/or (ii) migration barriers (capping systems or subsurface barrier walls)with active and passive gas collection or venting layers, and monitoring and alarm systems. In some instances, LFG can be burned or recovered to generate power. The amount and age of wastes are important factors for consideration when evaluating the feasibility of recovering LFG for energy. By collecting and controlling LFG migration through treatment or recovery for energy helps reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and thereby reduce carbon footprint. The resulting carbon emissions offsets could also be sold to generate revenue through emissions offset programs, such as the Climate Action Reserve(CAR). FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 9 May 2013 289 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 4.2.4 Groundwater Impacts Leachate is generated when precipitation comes into contact with the waste. In some landfill facilities (typically, ones that are lined), leachate is collected and often treated or disposed of in some manner. However, at older facilities, which are typically unlined (such as the Site), leachate can contaminate groundwater when there is no mechanism for leachate control. To exacerbate this condition, LFG that is created through degradation of waste can also contaminate groundwater when contaminants in the gas are transferred from a gas to liquid phase and move in the subsurface environment with the groundwater. Challenges associated with redevelopment of a landfill site related to groundwater impacts may include: (i) increased infiltration due to irrigation; (ii) gas/groundwater interaction; and (iii) waste "squeezing" and displacement. When redevelopment requires deep foundation support systems, there is the potential that wastes will be driven below the water table. This can create potential infiltration pathways and squeezed wastes may generate leachate, which can further contaminate groundwater. 4.3 Foundation/Subgrade Performance While every site has unique features that impact site development, the physical properties of the waste will influence the stability and long-term integrity of any structure or facility constructed over it. Settlement of waste poses a major issue that must be addressed during redevelopment of the site and results from one or more of the following basic mechanisms: • mechanical or physical compression of the waste; • raveling or occasional movement of smaller waste particles into larger voids within the waste mass; • chemical changes to the waste resulting in volume changes;and • biological decomposition of certain wastes (particularly MSW) resulting in volume changes. Settlement is usually characterized as differential settlement and total settlement. Differential settlement is localized and can impact shallow foundations and stormwater drainage. Total settlement can impact transitions and may cause downdrag on piles used for deep foundation support. In order to accommodate the anticipated settlements, facilities must be designed to incorporate measures which would allow movement to take place, or which would hold the facility in place while allowing the surrounding waste to settle in a controlled manner. Also, careful selection of an end use facility that is not particularly sensitive to differential movements can avoid future issues associated with excessive settlement. FR0766F/PRI3012 20130603.docx 10 May 2013 290 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida Potential solutions to differential settlement include: (i) stiffen the foundation slab; (ii) construct the slab into modular units; (iii)reinforce the subgrade; (iv) densify the subgrade by using a surcharge; (v) dynamic compaction; and(vi) stabilize/remediate the waste. Potential solutions to total settlement include: (i) use flexible and above-ground connections; (ii) hang the utilities from the slab; (iii) design for downdrag; (iv) densify the subgrade by surcharge; (v)preload or dynamic compaction; and(vi) stabilize/remediate the waste. Landfill sites are often redeveloped for recreational use (e.g.,park, playing fields, golf course, etc.). These recreational uses are not very sensitive to settlement and structural stability issues. Where structures or buildings are incorporated into the end use plan, it is essential to select appropriate foundations to accommodate the anticipated movements. It may also be advantageous or cost-effective to incorporate site improvement techniques into the site development plan as a means of reducing the magnitude of future settlements and the impact on redevelopment. The ultimate selection of foundation type and any ground improvement technique will be driven by the type of structure to be used and its intended use. Where loads are relatively light (e.g., single story structure), shallow foundations, such as spread footings, grid foundations, or reinforced concrete mats, may be appropriate. In this case, the structure is allowed to settle with the waste in a controlled manner. Shallow (W foundation solutions must however address: • differential movements and tolerances; • connection to utilities and other appurtenances which extend to the structure; • connection to the landfill capping system; and • maintenance of grades with respect to surface-water drainage. Deep foundations, such as piles or drilled piers, involve constructing the foundation through the landfilled waste and founding the structure on more competent material existing below the waste mass. When deep foundations are used, the structure is not allowed to settle with the waste; it is held in place while the waste around it may settle. In general, deep foundations are only used for heavily loaded structures (such as high-rise developments) or where the intended facility can only accommodate small movements. Examples of the latter might include specialized medical facilities or research facilities housing sensitive equipment. Because landfill waste tends to be extremely heterogeneous and susceptible to settlement that could affect the performance of the structure constructed over it; site improvement techniques are often used to improve the subgrade to provide adequate foundation support. Examples of site improvement techniques include: FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 11 May 2013 291 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 (W South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida • bulk waste excavation from the structure footprint, and replacement with an engineered fill; • supplemental compaction of the waste (usually limited to shallow depths); • surcharging of the waste with settlement monitoring; • dynamic compaction; and • grouting or fly-ash injection. Other structural considerations also include corrosion and compatibility of the construction materials with the waste material. 4.4 Surface-Water Management Stormwater management systems, which are designed and constructed in accordance with applicable state and federal regulations to control discharges necessitated by rainfall events, incorporate methods to collect, convey, store, absorb, inhibit, treat, use or reuse water to prevent or reduce flooding, overdrainage, environmental degradation and pollution, or otherwise affect the quality and quantity of discharges. The Site is located within the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Southeast District. Generally,the stormwater management system is required to meet the water quality and quantity requirements of the associated water management/FDEP district, including National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. This includes newly proposed systems, as well as modifications to existing systems. Surface-water management systems typically include retention/detention basins, swales, and/or underground infiltration galleries (engineered underground voids with porous bottoms designed to store and discharge stormwater through infiltration to groundwater). Waste disposal sites pose special challenges to providing surface-water management facilities. Because infiltration of stormwater through waste would tend to increase the potential for groundwater contamination or spread existing contamination, detention/retention basins, ditches, and swales should not be located above or immediately next to buried waste. Therefore,the areal extent and configuration of the waste on the site may dictate the available space required for locating the surface-water management facilities. If there is insufficient "clean" area to accommodate on-site surface-water discharge, other options must be considered(e.g.,waste relocation, lined detention basins,etc.). 4.5 Long-Term Stewardship Challenges associated with long-term care of landfills include providing for post-closure, long-term operations, maintenance, monitoring, assessment, management, and cleanup of (W FR0766F/PR13012_20130603.docx 12 May 2013 292 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida known releases, and unanticipated releases, which may require remediation. These challenges are often addressed with a combination of tools, including development of an operations and maintenance (O&M) Plan, securing financial assurance,and regulatory oversight. (W FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 13 May 2013 293 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida (W 5. TECHNICAL ISSUES AFFECTING REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE 5.1 Overview This section focuses on the technical issues or challenges that are likely to affect redevelopment of the Site. Considerations include environmental assessment/remediation, waste delineation, geotechnical considerations, stormwater, settlement, landfill gas, foundation issues, shallow soil issues, drainage features needed, earthwork, potential for moving groundwater plume, etc. A summary of the technical considerations for each of the three potential redevelopment options for the Site is provided in Table 2. These technical issues are based on the following information(based on the available data)on the landfill: • The South Gifford Road Landfill is a closed, Class 1 (MSW) disposal facility on a 115-acre property, of which it is unknown approximately how many acres were used for waste disposal. The exact lateral and vertical extent of waste has not been documented. However, based on historical accounts, the bottom of the waste may extend down to at least 10 ft BLS. The thickness of the waste across the site is unknown. • The waste is approximately 35 to 50 years old. The composition and characteristics of the waste are documented as being commercial, industrial, residential, and agricultural (W wastes. The amount and frequency of cover soils placed on the waste is unknown. • Waste disposal activities were terminated in August 1977, and the final landfill cover, which was comprised of approximately two ft of an unknown clean fill material, was constructed in 1978. Pine foliage was planted in various areas of the site in 1979. A final closure report was not prepared for the site. • Surface-water management is not currently required at the site. However, from aerial photography, it appears that stormwater runoff from the site is channeled to a pond located in the eastern central portion of the Site. • Documented impacts to groundwater and remedial activities are summarized in the December 2012 Semi Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report for the Plume Monitoring Network, South Gifford Road Landfill3. 3 Geosyntec Consultants, 2013. December 2012 Semi Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report for the Plume Monitoring Network South Gifford Road Landfill. February 2013. FR0766F/PRl3012 20130603.docx 14 May 2013 294 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida Table 2. Technical Considerations for Potential Site Redevelopment Alternatives for the Former South Gifford Road Landfill Technical Considerations y zt a y .S, Redevelopment w y � 01 •.. +. Options o, ° .o �' et o 4 04 Greenspace/ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Recreational $ Municipal/ Enhancement to ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ $$$$ Current Land Use Commercial/LI ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ $$$ 5.2 Landfill Gas Based on the volume, age, and type of waste, it is possible that LFG may be present at the Site. If the waste is to remain in place, the potential for LFG migration will be a key redevelopment challenge. To avoid potential problems associated with gas migration, enclosed structures constructed over the waste would need to incorporate adequate measures to prevent release of the potentially harmful gasses into the environment. Measures typically used include: (i) provision of a vapor barrier between the structure and underlying waste; (ii) incorporation of gas venting (which will be an upgrade of the existing system) and, if needed, treatment system; and (iii) an active gas monitoring program (or potential to upgrade to an active system). Often a combination of these measures is used to provide a degree of redundancy and added security. It is assumed that the waste will remain in place; therefore, an investigation will be necessary to provide information on the nature, extent, and generation rates of the LFG. This information would be used to design a LFG management system (if needed)that is protective of human health and the environment regardless of the selected redevelopment option. 5.3 Groundwater/Leachate Chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs) are currently monitored on a semi-annual basis at the Site. Additional information regarding the nature and extent of known groundwater impacts at the Site and can be found in the December 2012 Semi Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report for the Plume Monitoring Network, South Gifford Road FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 15 May 2013 295 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida Landfill (Geosyntec, 2013). Redevelopment will require additional site assessment, remediation,and implementation of land use restrictions. The identified groundwater impacts at the Site are currently being managed with an approach that includes source area bioremediation and monitored natural attenuation of the dissolved groundwater plume that is over 100 acres in size. To date, the costs related to the voluntary assessment and remediation of the South Gifford Road Landfill are approximately $3 million. Most other sites of this size and type are managed under regulatory purview, such as Consent Orders or the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) program. Management of sites within programs such as these can increase the programmatic requirements and costs to the Site owner. IRC SWDD has been managing the South Gifford Road Site under voluntary cleanup action and has been successful in negotiating a favorable position with FDEP. Below is a summary of costs related to assessment and remediation at other similar sites in Florida (dissolved plumes of chlorinated solvents over 100 acres): • Tallevast Lockheed Martin Site (Sarasota) — P&T system with over $30 million in expenditures over next five years(Consent Order with FDEP). • Honeywell Waters Avenue Site (Tampa)—multi-million dollar P&T system with over $500,000 per year in operation costs(Consent Order with FDEP). (W • Raytheon Site (St. Petersburg) — Excavation, bioremediation, and P&T system with over $10 million in capital costs and likely over $1 million per year in ongoing costs (Consent Order with FDEP). • NASA Launch Complex 34 (Kennedy Space Center)—Over$2 million in capital costs for a two-acre source zone containment and over $300,000 per year in operational, maintenance, semi-annual sampling and reporting costs(RCRA Program). Applying typical industry unit rates for full-scale bioremediation costs per acre to the South Gifford Road Site corresponds to about $200,000 per acre. This equates to approximately $6 to $10 million to treat the 30 to 50 acre plume of higher CVOC concentrations or over $30 million for bioremediation of the entire groundwater plume. Similarly, applying typical industry unit rates for air sparge remediation technology (which has been widely used for CVOCs sites in Florida) corresponds to about $300,000 per acre. This equates to approximately $9 to $15 million to treat the 30 to 50 acre plume of higher CVOC concentrations or over$45 million for air sparging of the entire groundwater plume. FR0766F/PR13012_20130603.docx 16 May 2013 296 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 5.4 Surface Water From current aerial photography it appears that stormwater runoff from the site is channeled to a pond located in the eastern central portion of the Site. A stormwater management system must be designed for redevelopment of the South Gifford Road Landfill to meet applicable regulations for storage, attenuation, and controlled discharge of stormwater runoff. The design should minimize the potential to cause or exacerbate groundwater contamination through generation or mobilization of leachate from the buried waste present at the Site. Based on our understanding that there is no permitted stormwater management system currently in operation at the Site, at a minimum stormwater best management practices will need to be implemented; however, it is likely that a stormwater management system will be required as part of the redevelopment. Such a stormwater management system would likely include a dry or wet detention basin with an engineered discharge structure located near the existing storm sewer. The location, configuration, and infiltration control features of the detention basin would be designed to meet the specific needs of the landfill redevelopment project. Because infiltration of stormwater through waste would likely exacerbate groundwater impacts at the Site, detention/retention basins, ditches, and swales should not be located above or immediately next to buried waste. 5.5 Waste Decomnosition and Settlement Based on the thickness, type, and age of waste at the Site, settlement will likely continue over time. The waste is subject to large settlements under initial loading and subsequent long-term settlement induced by. decomposition of organics. The highly variable thickness and composition of the waste may cause excessive differential settlement. A combination of enhanced waste degradation, subsurface improvement, foundation design, and facility type selection can provide for successful redevelopment of the Site despite the geotechnical challenges. Additional investigation will be required to define the lateral and vertical extent of waste, waste composition, age, compressibility, etc. to develop geotechnical solutions for the redevelopment project. 5.6 Lona-Term Stewardship At a minimum, long-term stewardship will require compliance with the current groundwater monitoring plan for the Site. Long-term stewardship will ultimately be driven by the findings from the investigations that would be required for redevelopment, as well as the end use alternative constructed for the site. For example, if enclosed buildings are constructed on the site, a LFG management system will likely be required. In that case, long-term stewardship would include monitoring of the LFG system. FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 17 May 2013 297 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 (W South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 6. SITE-SPECIFIC REDEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES 6.1 Overview Successful use of closed landfill sites requires advanced planning, proper design and construction, and subsequent monitoring and maintenance 4. The redevelopment alternatives considered as viable options for this Site are: (i) greenspace/recreational; (ii)commercial/light industrial; and (iii) municipal/enhancement to current land use. Greenspace/recreational use is by far the most common end use for closed landfill sites. According to the FDEP, recreational use is the most popular type of end use alternative for closed landfill properties in Florida and appears to be the best option for"maintaining environmental protection, ensuring public safety, and providing for a successful alternative use of the landfill property,5. Based on information obtained from the Use of Old Landfalls in Florida (Martin and Tedder, 2002) document and a telephone conversation with Mr. W. Lee Martin on 2 May 2013, within Florida, of 57 closed landfills that had been redeveloped by 2012, 571/o were used for recreational purposes, 28%were used for commercial purposes, 10%were used for residential purposes, and 7% were used for municipal purposes (schools)'. Construction of commercial/industrial structures and municipal facilities over or near landfills can pose engineering challenges and potential risks to human health and safety. End use alternatives for landfill redevelopment are briefly discussed below. 6.2 Greensnace/Recreational The greenspace/recreational landfill redevelopment alternative is applicable to the entire 115- acre Site, including land owned by the City of Vero Beach. Geosyntec contacted the City of Vero Beach Municipal Airport as part of this effort and spoke with Mr. Eric Menger, the Airport Director, regarding the objectives of this evaluation and potential redevelopment options being evaluated. Updates regarding environmental assessment and remediation activities being conducted on the City-owned portion of the Site are provided to Mr. Menger on a regular basis. During this evaluation, Geosyntec specifically discussed with Mr. Menger considerations with respect to potential development in the vicinity of the RPZ, potential redevelopment options on City of Vero Beach property, and document review and dissemination. We discussed with Mr. Menger plans to continue to solicit their feedback during this process and provide them with this and any further documents regarding this effort. Mr. Menger expressed interest in seeing the Site redeveloped with a beneficial end use for the community. 'Martin, W.L. and Tedder, R.B., 2002. Use of Old Landfills in Florida in the Proceedings of the 16th GRI Conference,Geosynthetic Institute,Philadelphia,PA,December 16-17,2002,P. 136. 5 Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2001. Guidance for Disturbance and Use of Old Closed Landfills or Waste Disposal Areas in Florida. May 3,2001. FR0766F/PR13012 2013%03.docx 18 May 2013 298 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 6.3 Municipal The municipal landfill redevelopment alternative is applicable to the County-owned northern portion of the Site (approximately 55 acres). This alternative generally includes municipal facilities, county staging areas, parking lots, local government buildings, waste transfer stations, alternative energy, etc. In this specific case, it has been assumed that the municipal use would be enhancement to current land use, such as adding to the existing County Road and Bridge staging facilities and parking areas. This end use would include limited to no construction of enclosed structures at the Site, but could require some land clearing and routine mowing and maintenance. Continued use as a municipal facility with potential enhancements would likely be the most cost effective redevelopment alternative, but would not have the added benefits of added income or community benefit (as discussed above). Another potential end use that could be considered under this category is alternative energy, specifically, use of the Site for a solar panel farm. This land use would require some initial capital, site clearing and maintenance, but minimal other site alterations. Additionally, there are grant programs available for alternative energy and there is the potential for revenue generation from energy sales. Potential technical considerations related to this redevelopment alternative include: waste delineation, ecological risk assessment, shallow soil assessment and delineation and addressing any identified impacted soils, groundwater (additional assessment and remediation), surface and stormwater management, and long-term site maintenance and stewardship. 6.4 Commercial/Light Industrial The commercial/light industrial landfill redevelopment alternative is evaluated only for the County-owned northern portion of the Site (approximately 55 acres). This alternative includes both commercial and industrial uses for closed landfill sites and incorporates developments where industrial and commercial land uses typically occur together or in close functional proximity. Many closed landfills are located in older built-out industrial areas. If properly closed, these landfill sites can be redeveloped into industrial use, consistent with surrounding land use. Light industrial land use includes "industrial parks", which are often used for warehousing, wholesaling, light manufacturing, and retailing. Commercial land use includes conventional malls, strip shopping centers, big box retailers, alternative energy, and independent commercial establishments (including restaurants). Light industrial use includes small plants and facilities often focused on design, fabrication, assembly, and finishing products. This type of redevelopment could result in increased income (i.e., tax revenue) to the County. Examples of commercial redevelopments built on closed landfill in Florida sites include Biscayne Commons (Miami-Dade County, Florida), a Burger King and car dealership in FR0766F/PRI 301220130603.docx 20 May 2013 300 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida Hillsborough County, Florida, and a Wal-Mart in Broward County, Florida. One example of a closed landfill site converted into industrial land use is a gunite processing facility in Orange County,Florida. Because commercial establishments by nature are open to the general public and consist of enclosed structures, there is concern for public health and safety when enclosed structures are constructed over closed landfills. Two primary areas of concern are exposure to on-site contamination and the potential for explosions or unsafe breathing conditions due to the presence of LFG in enclosed areas. Providing a sufficient physical barrier between the waste and the users, coupled with institutional controls, can be an effective means of protection to human exposure to on-site contamination. Parking facilities associated with commercial establishments can be incorporated into engineered solutions to prevent access to surface contaminants and can also help to limit infiltration through the waste (thereby minimizing generation of leachate)_ If buildLngs, are cons r�d on top of waste with the potential to generate LFG,management systems must be incorporated into overall site development plans. In addition to the environmental health and safety issues discussed above, land settlement can be a primary concern when developing a site into industrial use since this type of land use often incorporates mechanical and/or electrical equipment that may be sensitive to settlement. Light structures can be designed to take into account the anticipated waste settlement. High- rise and other heavier loaded structures may require deep foundation support, such as pile foundations. Potential technical considerations related to this redevelopment alternative include: landfill gas, groundwater (additional assessment and active remediation), waste delineation, shallow soil assessment and delineation and addressing any identified impacted soils, surface/stormwater management, waste decomposition/settlement issues, and long-term stewardship. (W FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 21 May 2013 301 Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Options May 2013 (W South Gifford Landfill,Indian River County,Florida 7. CONCLUSIONS 7.1 Potential Data Gaps Depending on the selected redevelopment option, data gaps will vary. For all three of the options described herein, the location and type of waste and delineation of potential shallow soil impacts are data gaps. Additionally, for specific options there are additional data gaps that exist, such as: conducting an ecological risk assessment (greenspace/recreational), conducting an investigation to provide information on the nature, extent, and generation rates of LFG (commercial/light industrial), completing additional site assessment, remediation, and implementation of land use restrictions (municipal or commercial/light industrial), geotechnical investigation to evaluate waste decomposition and potential settlement issues (commercial/light industrial). 7:2 Cost Considerations The relative costs for the alternatives discussed herein are (from likely least to more costly): greenspace/recreational, municipal (enhancement of current use), and commercial/light industrial. An additional consideration is that some redevelopment alternatives could potentially generate revenue for the County, including the use of the site for a solar farm, commercial/light industrial, or the sale of LFG. If the County wanted to sell the property to a (W developer for development of the Site according to any of the discussed alternatives (primarily greenpsace/recreational or commercial/industrial), the sale of the property could generate revenue. However, the County would either have to address all environmental concerns at the Site before concluding that sale or negotiate with the potential buyer to retain environmental liabilities for addressing the long-term environmental issues at the Site. 7.3 Summary The primary focus of this document has been the evaluation of potential end use options for redevelopment of the former South Gifford Road Landfill and identification of potential benefits, drawbacks, and considerations for each option. The redevelopment feasibility is based ultimately on County needs, technical practicability of implementing various remediation and/or site preparation strategies, and the cost associated with each approach. The next recommended steps are to present these potential options to stakeholders and prioritize options based on the criteria listed above. At that time, the data gaps related to potential option(s) can be addressed and the feasibility and costs for the specific redevelopment option can be evaluated in more detail. (W FR0766F/PR13012 20130603.docx 22 May 2013 302 -NO 3W No �.l ■� ,,, Legend Recovery Well Location m ® Injection Well Location 0 Maintenance Monitoring Well Location r. r • Plume Monitoring Well Location ®Gifford Road Landfill Property Boundary A; Parcels owned by Indian River County Parcels owned by the City of Vero Beach ° Runway Protection Zone r r � r Notes: 7.Maintenance wells are defined as monitoring wells ..,:. ..... _ thatre anot being monitored but are maintained for water level measurement purposes. 2.Source of 2008 Aerial:Florida Department of Transportation,Surveying and Mapping Office. Site Map South Gifford Road Landfill Geosyntec"' FIGURE NO. 1 consultants PROJECT NO. FR0766 �nwNMnrwwrw°osmiYwXaGFoaor �++.�nn°wwYvwaJx° W O N ,,zoo soo o +. Fee+ Legend ® Gifford Road Landfill Property Boundary One-Mile Radius LDR(Low Density Residential) ® MDR(Medium Density Residential) - HDR(High Density Residential) - CGC(Community/General Commercial) - LI(Light industrial) RPI(Residential-Professional-Institutional) ROS(Recreation and Open Space) - Water ® RC(Regional Commercial) Notes: 1.Parcel and landuse information were obtained from the Indian River County Property Appraisees Office and GIS department. 2.Source of 2012 Aerial:Florida Department of Transportation, Surveying and Mapping Office. Surrounding Land Use South Gifford Road Landfill FIGURE NO. 2 'Geosyntec� l CO11SUlti11]tS PROJECT NO. FR0766 MM.I��+WTN TIOeIaHgIMMVmMPRlO+TMnMiMIMJ✓aK+I.M OJYR't01�JM W O Geosyntec " 316 South Baylen Street,Suite 201 Pensacola,Florida 32502 consultants PH 850.477.6547 FAX 850.477.6707 Nwiw.9e0syntec.c0m 23 April 2013 Mr. Himanshu Mehta Managing Director Indian River County Solid Waste Disposal District 1325 74th Avenue Southwest Vero Beach,Florida 32968 Subject: Project Management Report and Transmittal of Final Invoice South Gifford Road Landfill Dear Mr.Mehta: Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) prepared this project management report to address the Plume Groundwater Monitoring project being conducted by Geosyntec on behalf of Indian River County at the South Gifford Road Landfill site. This report presents: (i) a budget overview for this project, (ii) a summary of activities completed to date; (iii) a discussion of the work reflected on the enclosed final invoice. The enclosed final invoice reflects labor and from 1 through 31 March 2013 and expenses from 27 February 2013 for work performed at the South Gifford Road Landfill. Table 1 provides invoicing details for the project. PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Geosvntec's Proiect No FR0766F: One Year of Groundwater MonitoringJRenortine and Related Actnihes ARC Work Order No S1 Budget Overview Invoice No. 12131114 dated 14 April 2013 for $448.44 forProject No. FR0766F is enclose Listed below is a summary of the budgetd. . Geosyntec is within the budget appropriated for this Approved Budget: $110,765.00 Invoiced Amount: $110J63.33 Remaining Budget $ 1.67 Work Completed to Date The authorization to proceed was dated 17 July 2012. The first semi-annual plume monitoring event under this work order was conducted 7 through 9 August 2012. Well maintenance activities were completed the week of 13 August 2012. The semi-annual groundwater FR0766/PRI3025 engineers I scientists I innovators 306 Mr. Himanshu Mehta 23 Apri12013 Page 2 monitoring report was submitted to FDEP on 28 September 2012. As requested by IRC SWDD, Geosyntec completed a pollution liabilities evaluation, which was out-of-scope of the current authorization. A project meeting was held 14 November 2012 to discuss project history and options for master planning at the site. The semi-annual groundwater sampling activities were completed in December 2012 and the report was submitted to FDEP on 28 February 2013. Site master planning activities were performed in April 2013 and an Evaluation of Site Remedial Options was submitted to IRC SWDD on 16 April 2013. Reflected on Enclosed Final Invoice Labor and expenses reflected on the enclosed invoice are attributed to: • labor indicated as professional services ($381.75) is attributed to project management and master planning activities. • reimbursable expenses ($55.24) are associated with semiannual report submittal via Federal Express. The remainder of the invoice is associated with a communications fee per the contract. CLOSURE Geosyntec appreciates the opportunity to provide services to Indian River County. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence,please feel free to contact me at(850) 477-6547. Sincerely, Aug 0(�7 Lauren Petty Hydrogeologist ill W.JOhnSOT1, G. Enclosure Senior Hydrogeologist FR0766/PR13025 engineers I scientists I innovators 307 Table 1 Summary of Invoices Submitted for Geosyntec's Project Number FR0766F South Gifford Road Landfill Geosyntec Project Number/IRC Work Authorization Number Invoice No. Invoice Date Amount 123812004 08/22/2012 $1,892.03 123812008 09/19/2012 $42,652.81 123812010 10/03/2012 $16,644.11 123812015 11/08/2012 $5,514.24 FR0766F 123812018 12/18/2012 $9,453.32 (IRC Work Order No.5) 123813023 01/15/2013 $18,729.60 123813026 02/11/2013 $8,695.39 123813029 03/19/2013 X6,7 3.39 12131114 4/19/2013 $448.44 TOTAL $110,763.33 FR0766/PRI3025 engineers I scientists I innovators 308 (--,Geosyntec � P� . EASE REMIT PAYMENT TO. {.��{ Geosyntec Consultants consultants 900 Broken Sound Parkway NW,Suite 200 Boca Raton,Florida 33487-2775 USA Tel (561)995-0900 Fax(561)995-0925 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Invoice#: 12131114 1325 74TH AVENUE S.W. Project: FR0766F VERO BEACH,FL 32968 Invoice Date: 4/19/2013 Attention:HIMANSHU H.MEHTA,P.E. Project Name: GIFFORD GW MONITORING& REPORTING For Professional Services Rendered through transaction date: 4/14/2013 IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS PROJECT,PLEASE CONTACT JILL JOHNSON AT 850-477-6547. Professional Services $381.75 Communlcatlons Fee $11.45 Reimbursable Expenses $55.24 Current Invoice ..................................q4 A **Amount Due This Invoice `" $448.44 Statement Prior Billings $110,314.89 Project Budget $110,765.00 Current Irwoice $448.44 Expended to Date $110,763.33 Billed To Date $110,763.33 Contract Balance $1.67 Paid To Date $103,581.50 "Amount Due This Invoice ** $U8i44 309 Cjact FFR0766F -- GIFFORD GW MONITORING& Invoice#121311114 Phase: 01)PROJECT MANAGEMENT Rate Schedule Labor Class/Employee Name Date Hours Rate Amount ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT GENERAL JANISCH,LINDSEY 03/01/2013 0.25 87.00 21.75 Total: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 0.25 21.75 PROFESSIONAL REPORT PREPARATION PETTY, LAUREN 03/05/2013 0.50 124.00 62.00 Total: PRQFESSLONAL 03/08/2013 1.00 124.00 124.00 1..54 186.00 Rate Schedule Labor 207.75 Total Phase: 01)PROJECT MANAGEMENT Labor : 207.75 Expense 0.00 Phase: 04)DATA EVALUATION&REPORTING Regular Expenses Vendor Name Doc Nbr Date Cost MuQipller Amount Postage/Courier-Billable FEDERAL EXPRESS A96207 2/27/2013 27.62 1:000 27.62 FEDERAL EXPRESS A96207 2127/2013 27.62 1.000 27,62 ......................»55.. . _._. 24 ..__._....-............ 55.24 Regular Expenses 5&24 Total Phase: 04)DATA EVALUATION&REPORTING Labor 0.00 Expense 55.24 Phase: 05)SITE MASTER PLANNING Rate Schedule Labor Class/Employee Name Date Hours Rate Amount SENIOR PROFESSIONAL 3ENERAL JOHNSON,JILL 03/22/2013 1.00 174.00 174.00 Total: SENIOR PROFESSIONAL 1.00 174.00 310 eject: FR0766F -- GIFFORD GW MONITORING$ Invoice#:12131114 Phase: 05)SITE MASTER.PLANNING Rate Schedule Labor 174.00 Total Phase: 05)SITE.MASTER PLANNING Labor 174.00 Expense 0.00 Total Project Labor 381.75 Total Project Expense 55.24 Total Project FR0766F -. GIFFORD GW MONITORING& 436.99 (w 311 INCPMGEO ,e Invoice I11umher invoice Date Account Number Page 2-196-75540 Mar Q5,20133906-2872-2 4 of 6 FedEx Express Sbipment Detail By Reference(Original) • Fuel Surcharge-FadEx has applied a fuel surcharge of 10:Do%to this shipment • The Earned Discount for this ship date has been calculated based on a revenue threshold of S 15690.36 • Distance Based Pricing,Zone 4 Automation INET Sander RPOiRient Tracking ID 794854438992 Jill Johnson Himanshu Mehta Service Type FedEx Standard Overnight Geosyntec Consultants IRC SWDD Package Type FedEx Box 316 South Baylen Street 1325 74TH AVE SW Zone 04 PENSACOLA FL 32502 US VERO BEACH FL 32968 US Packages i 59.80 Rated Weight 6.0 lbs,2.7 kgs Transportation Charge Delivered Feb 28,2013 11:14 Fuel Surcharge 251 Svc Area AA Earned Discount 3.20 33.49 Signed by V.LEMONS Discount USD- $Z7.62 FedEx Use 00000000010001327/_ TetJa 9e • Fuel .rphaT9e-FedEx has applied afuel surchargeoffO."IftisAmopffient • The Earned Discount for this ship date has been calculated based on a revenue threshold of S 15890.36 • Distance Based Pricing,Zone 4 Automation INET Sender eci ant Tracking ID 794854536580 Jill Johnson Karen Kantor Service Type FedEx Standard Overnight Geosyntec Consultants FID EP Southeast District Package Type FedEx Box 316 South Baylen Street 400 North Congress Avenue Zone 04 PENSACOLA FL 32502 US WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 US Packages 1 Rated Weight 6.0Ibs,2.7 kgs Transportation Charge 59.80 Delivered Feb 28,2013 13-36 Fuel Surcharge 2.51 Svc Area Al Earned Discount.. -1.20 Signed by B,TARANTINO Discount -33.49 FedEx Use 00000000010001327/_ Total Charge USD $27.62 FRO766F Reference Subtotal USD $55.24 312 �,nx _. .,: ;��.., .. ":s, .5.! `. M'o-x� .,;' .r�cx, ..x �g ..`• �, '`� ��„; 'r �� s"sr �� u�a=�.v'�'"m '& '�°'�,+ 1 -.`�.,. � ,. '�- ;,, gg, .,t � ,v..; ;.��.,�. �..r`<a:,, c .s...-... v,k.,.ak;z, - 4„ ,,: ..x"fi � -.. "v x �.`&,.g a, .� +�� R ^... ..3� ed`?�k' #+ x`k 4..,.��c` ♦ a� _.;, .�. :,'� �i ;,,�',,,.x .>�,,';zas ,$...,s :,: ,. .�,,;, .x ,,-. �.*r s <s .;s' .,�,.�„` .'s +r« `' ', ,��,.^ `�'�,-.xS xfi. s *'k. •t>aaE 2 .r :a=. � �.y?°°"�`�;:`,�a"`T.m ';a•..: '�'s�,�';, �" s� 2�y •s-:- ^�' R �"a: , °r` ^"'�'fip ,a �f'..,,.,,�4 rc,R:`. e ..r•�' - ar �x:.,64*, ti �a,?re"�..� 't'rk� ;:..r �+:. �' �"�'`�° _� :+ .,x a r xr� :�r a.u5x... ,:.r, �,. ?".-,�,s 4 Preliminary Evaluation of Site Redevelopment Former Gifford Road Landfill June 18, 2013 Bkally .z... i f Chlorine P Vinyl Chloride ` 7 Hydrogen n - Carbon• _ f-e' _ 1� Bond �^'• "f^,.,�. -. .1 Imo" �, rrichloroemene engineers (scientists innovators h. J> •'�"C �� .T+ ,�.�; :� ..€" .w"' �` £, *r ix w.� .;�0"• W� �`� Y.m` "fie t .'� s. .�. ..ay .�: �c. a'.�w' �. +�� , ss.•;r': ?� � * � ole • Objective • Brief Site History • Beneficial Re-use of Closed Landfills • Specific Options for Gifford PreliminaryData Gaps from Evaluation • Conclusions and Path Forward : engineers I scientists I innovators ' �" �~. �:"'w�. sirs.»t„,m."xz^ •. y.�; ,'� i�sa>' x,- + `ara ` >m r�4 } '"..` �Y ^'� ""*F„ e*.7�. Olt TO"1 u 6�hh ORN • engineers I Scientists I Innovat6rs L NIII t • Passive remedyfor plume of this magnitude - monitoring likely to continue for 20 to 30 years unless more active approach implemented pp p ented (common low-costa approach) ) • �$3 M spent on assessment/remediation (over 14 yrs) • Cost savings measures: removing wells, decreasing samplingfrequency, and transitioning to passive sampling • p g techniques Other Sites in similar size and contamination �,. have spent $2M to $30M for assessment/remedial efforts Seep � ( age 16 of Report) v, engineers J scientists .innovators s 777 7-7, Geo �L `c .^ ��....tt` E � C' .*•,,��,z"}v -v*.s >, VER � 11D)� COSTS TO, DATE Groundwater Bioremediation Year Assessment P&T "Big Dig" Monitoring Groundwater Implementation/ Remediation Remediation Reporting plementation/ TOTALS Field Activities Reporting 1999-2000 $181,421 200x2001 $184,182 $388,795 $181,421 2001-2002 $135,574 $90,284 $572'977 2002-2003 $787,093 $222,937 $44491 $1,012,950 20.05-2007 � $267,428 $27,897 $119,323 $89,699 $236,919 2008-2009 $4,592 $53,496 $43,732 2009-2010 $198,303 $300,123 201x2011 $53,496 $43,732 $87,228 $125,802 $56,809 $155,768 $338,379 2011-2012 $41,123 $23,245 TOTAL $505,768 $506,975 $787,093 $616177 $64,368 $301,708 $354,071 $3,071,792 engineers `scientists*I innovators4 ry. q, -.` �'`� .. � � '4✓' � � "�`�5^ � �. �'"� t �^ DIVER ., � i. -, r`Y'tr ��, k'"<."{7r ... '•.�. � a.,s fir"'' ��'k`��t a�'�� Y� {q/�1.�.y��. � e n s4a � • FIDEP reports over 50 successfulformer landfii I I redevelopment projects in FL, including :� Commercial/Industrial Residential Recreational — ball fields (baseball, soccer, etc.) Educational — renewable energy demonstration area, butterfly gardens, eco-friendly, community gardens, nature trails Development of renewable energy (solar, wind, biodiesel WEREs innova rsdf6iwsts N nova ors �,.. MEMNON a s* +�;- ..� Q; M ..x . �", : ✓ sx '�.. .aia9e:ix" e�t�, x'.:F'* e ssrt"x t# �� . '�fi 7 ;b �*�« ,.ate �:y,*!g..,, .• �;� t � rr.-� a�"�.;r "§�1�,.'r a�. i �, '`�"�,...�`w"S�� ' �c� � ' rt k F as d Dyer Park (Palm Beach County) Crystal Springs Rd Park Park Ridge Golf Course Jacksonville (Lantana) x� V �eragineers(scientists[innovators ar`" g, a � "w°` ,��'r, r� " , nx� tib= t ��•��x" �� 1VER to C� w , .: ." ., ,.. a �.,- .,:•�:�:�� is*..w,c 3.r' .:' `-.,a „„,:: S:t' sg,. t 4., a Y3 s,.,�r "�� `�” r .S k s .. {�:{r" 7.+ , ,.7, .',. i �r Fes Cyd SS p� yy ZEA x d 1� S engineers(.scientists innovators ` t h u rz aIMted t, ,s. .. X34 ?$rc .a';s*e �'' *�f � W •�' SY ., `k" max., --�,� ,3'�;';-'a�.` " „r s,;� �' a � t"•. (�� t r a x z Solar Farms F/orrda Georgia and Colorado k z � .� FPL's three new commercial- scale,scale, renewable, solar ower plants p ants total 110 MW of capacity. FL may become 2nd Y largest solar power-producing state in the t . country. _�[�1��=SGl+4�k�15��tfi�flVs7�Ot5» a.� .-� -�'•�.�� , �Iw a p v b �4, t-o �StanW; r • Greenspace/Recreational (entire site) — Zoning considerations with airport property P Y — Golf courses and driving ranges, ballparks, soccer fields, elds, nature trails, public parks, open pavilions, and9 azebos — Often low cost alternative — Potential revenue generation for area with ball fields — About 5 parks, 2 sports complexes or recreational facilities, and 6 golf courses within six miles of Site "engineers,` scientists ( innovators , s COG x ,4"" ;� 5��f ?:5+'d.yy :Lys• � .3+$ `@ ftj-1s. f.�i`+�� Sh 4: 3y- ' n. • ORID Munici al (Northernp portion — Enhancement to current use, municipal facilities,, county staging areas, parking lots, local government buildings, waste transfer stations, renewable energy — Requires minimal site alterations — Grant programs available for alternative energyand nd potential revenue generation from energy sales • Commercial/Light industrialNo ( rthern portion — Industrial parks, warehousing, wholesaling, light g manufacturing, retailing, strip shopping centers, big box retailers — Potential for tax revenue — Many engineering and technical issues to address — Often used for closed landfills in industrial parts of cities Is �7. . engrneers'j"seienistsnnovators �� i�zx„�fir..x£�'#fi' �` ," }��° '�c. s..� � �,3u aaA�. ,�� -e�,�.r-,,• .� ,�=.a3"� ? V ��VER MT a „ ds ' lze a x z #Yk5"d IF�. ` k ks Y 5� a 4 i . , J r ,� 'a•+.,i a�*y;, .•1` v v .: '. �^ `y``b^x« am .'``: .e ..�.�,a k^' 3 ?'°.-,„ za^ " xim' :sem : - 'n. x ,M-4, ��.�,"'n*��4(��'"":�� 2�a-•'11 ° a t�,n� z ' 77 2 w # N "engineers (scientists j innovatorsf M- C Ph CO nswtanl � t G '4CORNP • Ecological risk assessment (greenspace/recreational) • Landfill gas investigation (commercial/industrial) • Geotechnical investigation (commercial/industrial) • Location and type of wasteall options) ( p s) • Delineation of potential shallow soil impacts (all options) • Additional site assessment/remediation (all options) � .... ....... engineers scientists,j, t no. .�tgn 4 a xp I'M a r L Municipal Enhancements Commercial/Light Industrial rn ti SAM nvolvement R�p « - ants including regular other funding Stakeholders options (i.e., meetings Brownfields) quest input nput on Board's preferred future land use options to focus future activities engineers I scientists t innovators 'z.