HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/6/1991BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1991
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1840 25TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman
Margaret C. Bowman
Carolyn K. Eggert
Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
**************
James E. Chandler, County
Charles P. Vitunac, County
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
9:00 A.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION -
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Charles P. Vitunac
County Attorney
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
5. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A.
B.
Regular meeting of 7/2/91
Regular meeting of 7/9/91
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate No. 1081,
in the sum of $82.26 for Sam High
B. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate No. 1086,
in the sum of $82.26 for Sam High
C. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate No. 1093,
in the sum of $79.03 for Sam High
D. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate No. 1094,
in the sum of $79.03 for Sam High
AUG 6,1
Administrator
Attorney
the Board
* * * * * * *
r p,rr
•
AUG 6 1991
BOOK 83 F'AGE 969
7. CONSENT AGENDA (continued) :
E. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate No. 1516,
in the sum of $99.07 for Sam High
F. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate No. 3321,
in the sum of $239.64 for Sam High
G. Approval of Duplicate Tax Sale Certificate No. 3673,
in the sum of $400.23 for Sam High
H. Received and placed on file in the office of Clerk to
Board: Audit of the District School Board,Indian
River County, for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1990
I. Resignation of Frances Harrison from Children's
Services Committee
(letter dated July 29, 1991)
.1. Request approval for Liz Forlani to attend Assoc. of
Records Managers & Administrators, Inc. (ARMA) Conf.
(memorandum dated July 31, 1991)
K. Bid Award: IRC 91-91 / Floating Mixer - Util. Dept.
(memorandum dated July 30, 1991)
L. IRC Bid 91-109 / Sale & removal of R.O. Train
(memorandum dated July 22, 1991)
M. Bid 91-112 / Silver Oaks Water Line Extension Util.
Dept.
(memorandum dated July 30, 1991)
N. IRC Bid 91-113 / Labor Contract - Utilities Dept.
(memorandum dated July 23, 1991)
O. Information & Referral Directory - VB Main Library
(memorandum dated July 30, 1991)
P. Construction Management & Inspection Services -
Indian River Blvd. Phase III
(memorandum dated July 29, 1991)
Q. Release of Easement Petition by: Martin & Mary Lou
Dean, Jr. - Lot 4 & N 1/2 of Lot 5, JC Acres Sub.
(memorandum dated July 18, 1991)
R. Windsor Properties Inc.'s Request for Final Plat
Approval for Phase II
(memorandum dated July 29, 1991)
S. Transfer of Grand Harbor Development Approvals
(memorandum dated July 29, 1991)
T. Modification to Developer's Agreement - CGN Subdivision
(memorandum dated July 26, 1991)
U. Request for Date of Public Hearing
(memorandum dated July 30, 1991)
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 a.m. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Madeline Kaye - request to be heard re: removal of
barrier erected in County right-of-way
(memorandum dated July 26, 1991)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS •
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CREATING
THE GLENDALE LAKES STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT
(memorandum dated June 24, 1991)
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Condemnation of Unsafe Structure Located at 4056
Old Dixie Highway
(memorandum dated July 10, 1991)
B. EMERGENCY SERVICES
1. Approval of Resolution Reauthorizing Imposition
of Countywide E911 Fee
(memorandum dated July 23, 1991)
2. Approval of Resolution Adopting the Indian River
County Hazardous Materials Emergency Plan
(memorandum dated July 25, 1991)
3. Approval of Resolution Adopting the 1991 County
Peacetime Emergency Plan
(memorandum dated July 25, 1991)
C. GENERAL SERVICES
None
D. LEISURE SERVICES
None
E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
None
F. PERSONNEL
None
G. PUBLIC WORKS
1. Continuance of Six Cent Local Option Gas Tax
(memorandum dated July 24, 1991)
2. Request by Mr. Frank Sidoti to Accept Mainte-
nance of a Portion of 107th St. - Fellsmere
(memorandum dated July 26, 1991)
3. Agreement for Implementation of Rotational
Impoundment Mgmt. Plan / Impoundment 22
(memorandum dated July 26, 1991)
800K 83 FAGE J
AUG 1991
AUG 6 1991
BOOK 83 EAU J 71
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (continued):
G. PUBLIC WORKS (continued):
4. Construction Materials Testing Indian River
Blvd. Phase III
(memorandum dated July 22, 1991)
5. Appraisal Services for Oslo Road/Old Dixie
Highway Improvements
(memorandum dated July 22, 1991)
6. Indian River Blvd. Phase III, IRC Bid 91-89
(memorandum dated July 24, 1991)
7. Indian River Blvd. Phase III - DER Permit
# 311423739 / Long Term Agreement for Exotic
Species Removal
(memorandum dated July 29, 1991)
H. UTILITIES
1. Request for Proposals for Updating of Existing
Utility Master Plans
(memorandum dated July 22, 1991)
2. North County Utilities (I.E., Removal of the
City of Sebastian from the County Utility
Service Area)
(memorandum dated July 22, 1991)
3. 50th Court - Old Sugar Mill Estates Water
Service
(memorandum dated July 29, 1991)
4. Cash Maintenance Bond
(memorandum dated July 30, 1991)
5. Blue Cypress Community Sewage Improvement
(memorandum dated July 29, 1991)
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. CHAIRMAN RICHARD N. BIRD
B. VICE CHAIRMAN GARY C. WHEELER
C. COMMISSIONER MARGARET C. BOWMAN
D. COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT
Adoption of Resolution of I.R.C., Fla. creating an
I RC Emergency Services District Advisory Committee
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (continued):
E. COMMISSIONER DON C. SCURLOCK, JR.
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS
A. NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
None
B. SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
None
C. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
1. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 7/16/91
2. IRC Bid #91-93 / Roll -Off Container Covers
(memorandum dated July 29, 1991)
15. ADJOURNMENT
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE
AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED.
bO K 83 FAuE 1
Tuesday, August 6, 1991
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida., met in Regular Session at the County Commission
Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday,
August 6, 1991., at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Richard N.
Bird, Chairman; Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman; Margaret C.
Bowman; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Also
present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; William G.
Collins, II, Assistant County Attorney; and Virginia Hargreaves,
Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
Dr. G. Julius Rice, Pastor, Community Church -United Church
of Christ, gave the invocation, and Attorney Collins led the
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Commissioner Eggert requested that the ribbon cutting cere-
mony for the new County Health Building be added under her
matters as Item 13D(2), and Chairman Bird wished to add under
Proclamations and Presentation acknowledgement of a plaque
received from the City of Sebastian. The Chairman later also
requested the addition of a report on the Parks & Recreation
Committee recommendations under his matters.
ON MOTION by Commissioner .Scurlock, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously added the
items described above to the Agenda.
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
Chairman Bird informed the Board that we have received a
plaque from the City of Sebastian acknowledging our support and
contribution to their 4th of July celebration, and he would like
to have Mrs. Forlani, the Board's Administrative Assistant, write
them a letter expressing our thanks.
BOOK 83 F'AUL
AUG 61.9,1
r
MIG 1991
BOOK 83i'
FACE 74:
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously directed that
a letter be sent to the City of Sebastian as suggested
by Chairman Bird.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or correc-
tions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 2, 1991.
There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 2, 1991,
as written.
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or correc-
tions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 9, 1991.
There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved
the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 9, 1991,
as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
Chairman Bird advised that Attorney Collins wished Item S
removed from the Consent Agenda for a correction.
A„ B., C., D., E., F., & G. - Duplicate Tax Sale Certificates
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Commis-
sioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved the
issuance of the following listed Duplicate Tax Sale
Certificates:
Certificate No. 1081 to Sam High
Certificate No. 1086 to Sam High
Certificate No. 1093 to Sam High
Certificate No. 1094 to Sam High
Certificate No. 1516 to Sam High
Certificate No. 3321 to Sam High
Certificate No. 3673 to Sam High
2
- $82.26
- $82.26
- $79.03
- $79.03
- $99.07
- $239.64
- $400.23
H. Reports
The following was received and placed on file in the Office
of Clerk to the Board:
Audit of the District School Board, Indian River County,
for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1990.
I. Resignation from Children's Services Committee
The Board reviewed letter from Frances Harrison, as follows:
THE TEACHER'S PLACE, INC.
..,:Child Care & Learning Center •
890 -6th Avenue
1 Vero Beach, Florida 32960
;Telephone: 569-5820
.26 2
....1284
'`y ;4 'v! `='�: i :,, : , _ DISTPICUTION LIST ... ,.
v,'°o9�ocF.' '-'% • :� ' ., ; ...j.•;4. .. _ Comrn,ssicners ae�-. Pu •
r''' s��FC ' cA °` ° , r • ' . JULY 29, 1991 ' Administrator
kr , .
�
le/ 21l 0 6 J,�, Public Works
1:.4!;1.64,1.,, ' . ; . • • . Community Dev. Personnel `t:
^ 't
' ,
..COMMISSIONER CAROLYN EGGERT Utilities
Finance - `.'"
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION
:;•1840 25TH ST. SUITE N-158 Other /%
AUG CV
J. Out -of -County Travel
BOOK 83 FAGE
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
out -of -County travel for Executive Aide Liz Foriani
to attend the Association of Records Managers and
Administrators, (ARMA) in Orlando September 22-26,
1991.
K. Bid #91-91 - Floating Mixer (Utilities)
The Board reviewed memo from Purchasing Manager Boynton:
DATE: July 30, 1991
j TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: Jams E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Sere'
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
SIIBJ: Bid Award: IRC 91-91/Floating Mixer
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date: May 15, 1991
Specifications mailed to: Three (3) Vendors
Replies: One (1) Vendors
VENDOR BID TABULATION
Aqua Aerobic Systems "'$11,309.15
Rockford, I11
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID:
BUDGETED AMOUNT:
$11,309.15
$12,000.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Sewer Utilities Sewage Plant Maintenance Funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
M ENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Aqua Aerobic Systems
as the sole bidder meting technical specifications as set forth
in the invitation to bid. This piece of equipment is very
specialized in the maintenance of sewage treatment plants. Three
manufacturers could bid on the unit, but when contacted, distance
and campetitive bidding was a deciding factor as freight charges
would have to be added into their price. Aqua Aerobic Systems
was the closest to Indian River County.
4
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #91-91 to the sole bidder Aqua Aerobic Systems
in the amount of $11,309.15 for a floating mixing
unit for the West Regional Wastewater Plant as
recommended by staff.
L. Bid #91-109 - Sale & Removal of R.O.Train
The Board reviewed the following memos from staff:
DATE:
TO:
THRU:
July 22, 1991
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi
'FROM: Fran Boyntop, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: IRC Bid #91-109
Sale and Removal of R.O. Train
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date: June 26, 1991
Specifications mailed to: Four (4) Vendors
Replies: ' Y.,r,°;; One (1) Vendor
BID TABULATION
Hydropro, Inc $600.00
North Palm Beach, ' Fl
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID: $600.00
:RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Hydropro, Inc as
the sole bidder for this sale. (See attached memo.)
•
•
DATE:
TO:
':' JULY 9, 1991
i.FRAN BOYNTON
PURCHASING MANAGER
DIRECTOR OF UTIL11:2SERVICES
TERRANCE G. PINTS
NOEL J. McMAHON
=;. ENVIRONMENTAL SPEC A ST
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES •
SUBJECT: BID TITLE: SALE AND REMOVAL OF R.O. TRAIN
BID NO. 91-109
The R.O. train that was removed from the North Beach Water Plant was
offered for sale on the subject bid. The manufacturer of the
membrane that is used in the R.O. train has gone out of business.
Since there was only one bid for this surplus equipment, the
Department of Utility Services recommends that the bidder, Hydropro,
Inc., be awarded the contract.
Please prepare the report to be scheduled on the Board's agenda.
5
AUG I
BOOK 83 F,1�[ 7
Pr -
?MG 619911
BOOK 83 FACE 978
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #91-109 for sale and removal of R. O. Train
to the sole bidder Hydropro, Inc. in the amount of
$600 as recommended by staff.
M. Bid #91-112 - Silver Oaks Water Line Extension
The Board reviewed memo from Purchasing Manager Boynton:
DATE: July 30, 1991
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Service
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
SUBJ: 91-112/Silver Oaks Water Line. Extension
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Specifications mailed to:
Replies:
BID TABULATION:
Carbec Construction
Orlando, Fl.-
AMDA Enterprises
Longwood, F1
Ted Myers
Winter Beach, Fl
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID:
BUDGETED AMOUNT:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
RECOMMENDATION:
July 19, 1991
Twenty -One (21) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
TOTAL LUMP SUM
$ 16,726.00
$ 19,240.00
$ 27,776.36
$ 16,726.00
$ 23,989.00
Silver Oaks Water Main Extension
Impact Fees
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Carbec Construction
as the lowest, most responsive, responsible bidder meeting
specifications as set forth in the Invitation to Bid. In addition,
staff requests the Board's approval for the attached agreement when
all requirements are met and approved as to form by County Attorney.
6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #91-112 to Carbec Construction as the lowest,
responsive, responsible bidder meeting specifica-
tions, in the amount
Water Main Extension
to execute agreement
are met and approved
of $16,726 for the Silver Oaks
and also authorized the Chairman
with same when all requirements
as to form by the County Attorney.
SAID AGREEMENT WILL BE MADE A PART OF THE RECORD WHEN FULLY
EXECUTED AND RECEIVED.0
N. Bid #91-113 - Labor Contract/Utilities Dept.
The Board reviewed memo from the Purchasing Manager:
DATE:
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 23, 1991
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servic
Fran Boynton,. .Purchasing Manager
IRC Bid #91-113/Labor Contract
Utilities Department
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Specifications mailed to:
Replies:
VENDOR
Driveways, Inc
Titusville, Florida
A.O.B. Underground
West Palm Beach, Florida
AMDA Enterprises
Longwood, Florida
JoBear
Palm Bay, Florida
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID:
July 25, 1991
Four (4) Vendors
Four (4) Vendors
HYPOTHETICAL PROJECT COST
(see attached list)
$175,308.10
$188,598.20
$250,522.00
$331,711.50
$175,308.10
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Water Utilities Other Improvements
Buildings Funds.
BUDGETED AMOUNT:
$337,000.00
Except
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Driveways, Inc. as
the lowest, most responsive and responsible bidder meeting the
specifications for the subject contract. (See attached memo).
7
AUG 6 1991
BOOK 83 f',9,€ j
AUG '9
BOOK
83 PAGE 950
.DATE: : JULY 22, 1991
•
. TO:
FRAN BOYNTON -
PURCHASING MANAGER
TERRANCE G. PIN • /
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY
:FROM: .NOEL J. McMAHONA/at
- -'ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIA
-DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY
•
...SUBJECT:
• , ;
VICES
ST
SERVICES
BID NO. 91-113/LABOR CONTRACT
The subject bid opening date was July 17, 1991; only four (4) bids
were received.
There were 118 line items in the bid. Driveways, Inc., has 69 line
items that were the lowest or tied for lowest. Driveways, Inc., had
30 line items that were second lowest or tied for second lowest
items. Driveways, Inc., had the largest number of lowest priced
line items than any other of the three bidders.
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the bid be
awarded to Driveways, Inc., as the lowest most responsive and
responsible bidder meeting the specification for the subject
contract.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #91-113 to the low bidder, Driveways, Inc., for
a Labor Contract for the Utilities Department in the
amount of $175,308.10, as recommended by staff per
the following list of items:
tipw
Ar°
) /
4,6L
) e4ex_
/
n A')
4!
/
ITEM
AMDA A.O.B. DRIVEWAYS JUCI:Ar
' MOBILIZATION - % 12.50 7.00
PERFORMANCE BOND - % 2.62 2.50
2" WATER MAIN - PVC 3.00• 1.50
2 112" WATER MAIN - PVC 3.00 1.75
3".WATER MAIN - PVC 3.00 2.00
4" WATER MAIN - PVC 3.10 2.00
6" WATER MAIN - PVC 3..20 2.00
8" WATER MAIN - PVC 4.60 ' 4.00
10" WATER MAIN - PVC 6.25 5.00
12" WATER MAIN - PVC 7.50 5.00
16" WATER MAIN PVC .. 9.20 8.00
'3" WATER MAIN - DUCTILE 3.50 2.25
4" WATER MAIN.- DUCTILE 3.60 2.25
6" WATER MAIN - DUCTILE 4.75 2.25
8" WATER t1AIN DUCTILE 6.10 4.25
10" WATER MAIN.- DUCTILE 7.75 5.75.
'12" WATER MAIN - DUCTILE 9.10 6.00
16" WATER MAIN - DUCTILE 10.00 9.00
TIRE HYDRANT 368.00 325.00
SHORT SERVICES 1" SINGLE 0.50 15.00
SHORT SERVICES 1.5 SINGLE 0.75 15.00
SHORT SERVICES 2" SINGLE 10.20 15.00
SHORT SERVICES 1" DOUBLE 9.40 15.75
SHORT SERVICES 1.5 DOUBLE 9.70 15.75
SHDRT SEP.VICES 2" DOUBLE 12.00 15.75
LONG SERVICES 1" SINGLE 6.00 3.75
LOND SERVICES 1.5 SINGLE 13.20 3.75
LONG SERVICES 2" SINGLE. 15.02 3.75
LONG SERVICES 1" DOUBLE 14.00 4.25
LONG SERVICES 1.5 DOUI:LF' 15.10 4.21
LUNG SERVICES 2" DOUBLE 16.92 4.21
DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 4" 18.00 25.00
" 6" 22.00 35.00
" 0" 26.00 50.00
" 10" 32.00 /.s . 00
" 12" 36.00 05 00
" 16" 40.00 110.00
DUCTILE IRON NJ PLUGS 4" 16.00 25.00
" 6" 18.00 35.00
'" 8" 27.00 50.00
to
10" 36.00 65.00
" - 12" 44.00 05.00
to
16" 50.00 110.00
INSTALL RESTRAINERS- 12" 22.00 75.00
ft
16" 28.00 115.00
TAPPING SLEEVE/VALVE 4" 118.00 100.00
" 6" 126.00 210.00
" O" 140.00 270.00
'i 10" 172.00 290.00
TAPPING FES 4" 403.00 140.00
TAPPING FEE 6" 460.00 150.00
TAPPING rEE 8" 475.00 220.00
TAPPING 1'EE 10" 575.00 200.00
INSTALL VALVES 4" 1s1.00 75.00
It 6" 20.00 15.00
ft 8" 24.00 105.00
" 10" 30.00 125.00
" 12" 51.00 145.00
" 16" 64.00 • 160.00
9
AUG 6 iggi
10.00
3.00
2.45
`.45
2.45
2.45
2.40
2.75
2.90
3.30
4.00
3.25
3.75
3.05
3.95
5.10
6.75
7.95
150.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
6.00
4.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
4.00
4.00
1.00
21' 00
22.00
25.00
30.00
91.00
45.00
10.00
10.00
15.00
15.00
10.00
220.00
40.00
•40.00
127.00
127.00
140.00
150.00
425.00
425.00
425.00
425.00
251.0 0
:10 00
35.00
40.00
45.00
50.00
3.00
1.50
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
1.50
4.75
'5.00
• 7.00
0.50
3.00
4.00
4.50
4.75
5.00
7.00
0.50
550.00
20.00
20.00
22:00
P2.00
02 (,n
'21.:'0
7.15
7.15
7.65
9. 15
0:1.5
8.65
40.00
65.00
00.00
125.00
250.00
375.00
40.00
65.00
80.00
125.00.
200.00
275.00
35.00
50.00
500.00
500.00
550.00
600.00
200.00
250.00
275.00'
300.00
_100.00
125.00
175.00
200.00
250.00
450.00
°
BOOK 8 f'AU,E ,
AUG(6 191
ITEM
JACK 6 BORE Mark-up - 1
Tie-in to PLUG or VALVE
Plug nr Cap ABANDONED LN
Excavation per Hour
SAMPLE POINT
2" BLOWOFF TEMPORARY
2" BLOWOFF PERMANENT
0" GRAVITY SEWER 4' DEEP
0" GRAVITY SEWER 8' DEEP
8" GRAVITY SEWER 12' DCEP
8" GRAVITY SEWER 16' DEEP
10" GRAVITY SEWER 4' DEEP
10" GRAVITY SEWER 8' DEEP
10" GRAVITY SEWER 12'DEEP
10" GRAVITY SEWER 16'DEEP
SINGLE LATERALS
SINGLE LATERALS
SINGLE LATERALS
SINGLE LATERALS
DOUBLE LATERALS
DOI.IBLE LATERALS
LM1UDLE LATERALS
DOUBLE LATERALS
T.V. SETUP
FORCE MAIN -PVC
4'DEEP/ft
8'DEEP/ft
12'DEEP/f
16'DEEP/f
4'DEEP/rt
8'DECP/rt
12'DEEP/r
16'DEEP/f
FORCE
MAIN --DUCTILE
3'1
11"
6"
8"
10"
12"
16"
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
12"
16"
SOD - PER iQ YD
SECO S MULCH PER SQ YD
PAVEMENT PER SQ YD
CONCRETE ROADS PER SQ FT
CONCRETE SIDEWALK / SQ FT
VALVE.20X in PAVEMENT
VALVE BOX in DIRT •
MAST BLOCKS PER CU YD
BACKFILL PER CU YD
MARK-UP ON MANHOLES X
MANHOLES 4' DEEP
MANHOLES 8' DEEP
MANHOLES 12' DEEP
MANHOLES 16' DEEP
MANHOLES 20' DEEP
ITEM
HARDSHIP PER CU YD
CLEARING PER Sq YD
STUMP REMOVAL PER INCH
TREE REMOVAL PER INCH
SETUP DEWATERING
DEWATEI1ING PER LN . T'T . / 100
TOTAL HYP. PROJECT
AMDA
15.00
124.00
62.00
50.00
64.00
72.00
59.00
6.00
6.00
9.00
14.75
7.50
8.45
10.30
15.65
• 5.80
6.85
9.45
14.24
6.60
8.05
12.35
16.50
690.00
3.40
4.00
4.45
4.90
5.40
6.70
8.05
3.95
4.65
5.10
5.55
5.95
8.10
9.95
2.00
0.54
10.90
1.65
1.50
54.00
20.00
75.00
4.90
15.00
320.00
400.00
927.00
151''.00
2246.00
AMDA
140.00
0.40
4.25
42.
29.10
250322.00
10
4
BOOK 3 PAGE 132
A.0.B. UrtIVEWAYS
10.00
125.00
150.00
140.00
90.00
140.00
90.00
5.00
11.00
14.00
10.00
5.00
11.00
14.00
10.00
4.00
9.00
13.00
10.00
4.50
9.50
13.50
10.50
900.00
9.00
3.50
• 4.50
5.25
6.50
8.00
9.50
3.25
3.75
4.75
5.50
6.75
8.25
9.75
1:45
0.33
20.00
3.75
1.90
60.00
35.00
70.00
5.50
4.00
200.00
250.00
400.00
600.00
750.00
A.O.B.
0.10
1.75
20.00
25
250.00
7.00
100590.20
16.00
100.00
50.00
75.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
5.75
6.75
9.50
11.00
6.00
7.00
10.50
12.50
5.75
6.75
9.50
12.50
6.25
7.25
10.00
12.75
25.00
2.45
2.45
2.50
2.75
2.90
3.30
4.00
3.25
3.75
.3.25
3.95
5.10
6.75
7.95
2.90
0.45
17.75
2.25
2.15
50.00
35.00
100.00
6.50
16.00
135.00
150.00
195.00
275.00
350.00
DPIVGWAY5
100.00
1.00
12.50
20
300.00
0.00
175300.10
JUGCAR
15.00
200.00
150.00
75.00
100.00
100.00
175.00
0.50
12.50
21.00
35.00
3.75
12.95
22.00
37.00
2 00 .00
200.00
275.00
315.00
250.00
250.00
' 275.00
315.00
450.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.75
5.00
7.00
8.50
4.00
4.00
4 50
4.75
5.00
7.00
8.50
1.25
0.27
20.00
2.50
1.65
150.00
50.00
100.00
6.00
15.00
450.00
550.00
750.00
1200.00
2500.00
•
JCEEAR
20.00
_ 2.00
10.00
15
1000.00
20.00
331711.50
0. information & Referral Directory - Main Library
The Board reviewed memo from the Purchasing Manager:
DATE: July 30, 1991
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
SUBJ: Information and Referral Directory
Vero Beach Main Library
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On an annual basis, the Vero Beach Library has 2,000 copies of an
Information and Referral Directory printed for distribution to
various agencies. This directory is printed in cooperation with
the Indian River County Council of Community Services, the Senior
Coalition of Indian River County and the North Indian River
County Library. Historically the printing of this directory has
cost the County less than $5,000.00.
ANALYSIS:
The Library prepared a written quotation outlining the specifica-
tions and mailed it to fifteen (15) of our local printers
requesting quotations. Thirteen (13) vendors submitted a
response with prices ranging frau $5,803.00 to $11,003.47.
(Exhibit A).
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Information and Referral Grant Funds.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: $8,511.00
RECOMMEN1DATION:
I have reviewed the written quotations submitted and recommend
that the Board waive the legal advertising requirements for any
purchase over $5,000.00 and accept the low bid of $5,803.00 sub-
mitted by Coastal Graphics.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously waived the
legal advertising requirements for any purchase over
$5,000 and accepted the low bid Coastal Graphics
for the information and referral directory for the
Main Library in the amount of $5,803 as recommended
by staff.
11
AUG 6 1911
BOOK 83 f GE 3c)
Fr"
AUG 6 1999
BOOK 83 PAGE b'S4
P. Construction Mgmt. & Inspect. Services - I.R.BIvd. Phase. Ill
The Board reviewed memo from Capital Projects Manager Terry
Thompson, as follows:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: Roger D. Cain, P.E.
County Engineer
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Consent Agenda
Construction Management and Inspection Services
Indian River Boulevard Phase III
DATE: July 29, 1991
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
At the meeting of July 9, 1991, the Board of County
Commissioners authorized. staff to prepare an amendment to
Boyle Engineering's contract for Construction Administration
Services to increase full-time on-site resident inspection
from the initial six months of construction to the full
twelve month construction period.
The attached Amendment No. 7A provides for Construction
Administration Services and Resident Project Representative
;Services for the full twelve month construction period at a
cost not -to -exceed $163,350.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
'Staff recommends that the County execute the attached
,agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation. Funding to be
:from Fund 309 -Indian River Boulevard North.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
Amendment No. 7A to Professional Engineering Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation as
recommended by staff.
SAID AMENDMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE
BOARD.
12
Q. Release of Easement - J. C. Acres Subdv. (Martin Dean, Jr.)
The Board reviewed memo from Code Enforcement Officer Heath:
TO:
:THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
•
James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert M. Reat]. g, P
Community Developm Director
--0517
Roland DeBlois, AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
& Code Enforcement
Charles W. Heathe.W. (4.
Code Enforcement Officer
July 18, 1991
RELEASE OF EASEMENT PETITION BY:
Martin & Mary Lou Dean, Jr.
• Lot 4 & N 1/2 of Lot 5, J.C. Acres Subdivision
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of August 06, 1991.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The County has been peZationed by Martin and Mary Lou Dean, Jr.,
the owners of the subject property, for the release of the common
three (3) foot side lot utility easements of Lot 4 and the
northerly one-half (1/2) of Lot 5, J.C. acres Subdivision. It is
the petitioners' intention to construct a single-family residence
on the subject property.
The current zoning classification of the subject property is RS -3,
Single -Family Residential District. The Land Use Designation is L-
1, allowing up to three (3) units per acre.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The request has been reviewed by Southern Bell Telephone Company,
Florida Power & Light Company, United Artist Cable Corporation, the
Indian River County Utilities Department and the Road & Bridge and
Engineering Divisions. Based upon their reviews, it was determined
that there would be no adverse impact to utilities being supplied
to the subject property by the release of the easements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends to the Board, through the adoption of a
resolution, the release of the common three (3) foot side lot
utility easements, being the southerly three (3) feet of Lot 4, and
the northerly three (3) feet of the northerly one-half (1/2) of Lot
5, J.C. Acres Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 13;
Section 20, Township 32 East, Range 39 South, as recorded in the
Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
13
AUG 6 1991
EOf1K8 F'a�r.'.�J�.
16 6 1991
•
BOOK 83 FALL 98e
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 91-86 abandoning certain easements in the
J. C. AcresSubdivisionas requested by Martin and
Mary Lou Dean, Jr.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-86
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, ABANDONING CERTAIN
EASEMENTS IN THE J.C. ACRES
SUBDIVISION, LOTS 4 & N 1/2 OF LOT
5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 13 OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, Indian River County has easements as described below,
and
WHEREAS, the retention of those easements serves no public
purpose,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners,of Indian River County, Florida that:
This release of easement is executed by Indian River County,
Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose
mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960,
Grantor, to Martin & Mary Lou Dean, Jr. their successors -in
interest, heirs and assigns, whose mailing address is 847 4th Lane,
Vero Beach, Florida 32962,Grantee, as follows:
Indian River county does hereby abandon all right, title, and
interest that it may have in the following described easements:
the common three (3) foot side lot utility
easements of Lot 4 and the northerly one-half
(1/2) of Lot 5, J.C. Acres Subdivision, being
the southerly three (3) feet of Lot 4, and the
northerly three (3) feet of the northerly one-
half (1/2) of Lot 5, according to the plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 13 of
the Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida.
THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Eggert
, seconded•by Commissioner Wheeler , and
adopted on the 6th
vote:
day of August
14
,•1991, by the following
Commissioner Richard N. Bird
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler
Commissioner Carolyn Eggert
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Aye
yA e
Aye
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 6th , day of August
,. 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
By
Richard N. Bird
Chairman
R. Final Plat Approval - Windsor Properties Phase 11
The Board reviewed memo from Senior Planner John McCoy:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. King, AICP
Community Development Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling;CP
Planning Director
FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP ,/,(01A
Senior Planner, Current Development
DATE: July 29, 1991
SUBJECT: Windsor Properties Inc.'s Request for Final Plat Approval
for Phase II
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of August 6, 1991.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On March 27, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners granted
conceptual special exception approval to the Windsor development
(replaced original conceptual plan approved in 1988) to construct
a residential recreational community on 405 acres approximately 1
miles north of the C.R. 510/S.R. A.1.A. intersection. Subsequently,
on March 14, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary PRD plat approval for Phase II, a 14.89 acre portion of
the overall project. The applicant has now submitted for final
plat approval for a 9.71 acre portion of the approved Phase II
preliminary PRD plat area. The 9.71 acre phase, now to be known as
the Phase II plat, includes 24 lots and two tracts. The remaining
portion of. the Phase II preliminary plat area will be "final
platted" at a later date.
All portions of the Phase II final plat will fit into and connect
with the existing Phase I plat area.
fp
15
BOOK
(jj PACE
:3 d
AUG 6 i
•
BOOK 83 F'd,uE 8
•
ANALYSIS:
The owner's agent, McQueen and Associates, Inc. is now requesting
final plat approval for a portion of Phase II and has submitted the
following:
1. A final plat in conformance with the approved preliminary PRD
plat;
2. A completed Contract for
Improvements;
3. An Engineer's Certified
required improvements.
4. An appropriate security arrangement acceptable to the County
Attorney's Office;
Construction of Remaining Required
Cost Estimate for the remaining
ANALYSIS:
None of the required subdivision improvements have been
constructed. The applicant is proposing to "bond -out" for the
required subdivision improvements as provided for in the County's
Land Development Regulations. The County Attorney's Office has
reviewed and approved the submitted Contract for Construction, and
the letter of credit. The Public Works and Utilities departments
have reviewed and approved the submitted Engineer's Certified Cost
Estimate and corresponding letter of crddit amount. It should be
noted that all improvements within Windsor will be private, with
the exception of certain utilities facilities that will be
dedicated to Indian River County, as approved by the Utilities
Department.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Grant final plat approval for the ± 9.71 acre Windsor Phase II
plat; and
. Authorize the Chairman to execute the submitted Contract for
Construction of Remaining Required Improvements and accept the
letter of credit that secures the contract. •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously granted
final plat approval for the Windsor Phase II plat
and authorized the Chairman to execute the Contract
for Construction of Remaining Required Improvements
and accept the letter of credit.
COPIES OF SAID DOCUMENTS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO
THE BOARD.
16
S. Transfer of Grand Harbor Development Approvals
The Board reviewed memo from Assistant County Attorney
Collins, as follows:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: bV(, William G. Collins II - Assistant County Attorney
DATE: July 29, 1991
SUBJECT: Transfer of Grand Harbor Development Approvals
Attached you will find a resolution approving the transfer of the DRI
approval for Grand Harbor. The resolution accepts the "Notice of Transfer
and Assumption of Development Order Approvals and Obligations", which is
attached as an exhibit to the resolution. River Harbor, Inc. has transferred
the Grand Harbor development to GHA Grand Harbor, Ltd.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached resolution consenting to transfer the development
approvals and obligations.
Attorney Collins informed the Board that the proposed
Resolution should have included Resolution 89-80 in the list of
those Resolutions by which the Development Order has been
amended. He just wished the Board to be aware that Resolution
number now has been added to the document they are being asked to
approve.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved as
amended Resolution 91-87 consenting to the transfer
of the DRI approval for Grand Harbor.
RESOLUTION NO. 91- R7
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CONSENTING TO THE TRANSFER OF THE APPROVAL
OF THE GRAND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
.IMPACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 4 OF RESOLUTION
85-128 FROM RIVER HARBOR, INC. TO GHA GRAND
HARBOR, LTD.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, adopted Resolution 85-128 on October 23, 1985, approving
the Development Order for the Grand Harbor Development of Regional Impact
located in Indian River County, Florida; and
WHEREAS, such .-Development Order has' been subsequently
amended by Resolutions 86-4, 86-89, 86-108, 87-147 and 89-80, and all such
amendments are on file with the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida; and
17 Poor 8 3 [ d (-1
� AUG -19'91
Pr—
AUG 61991
4.0
BOOK~fcc
u PAGE
WHEREAS, the former developer - of the project now desires to
transfer arid convey to GHA Grand Harbor, Ltd. all of its interest in the
project and all approvals as they exist with Indian River County including,
but_not limited to, the Development Order as amended, all PRD, zoning, site
plan subdivision; and all other approvals; and
WHEREAS, the successor in interest has, pursuant to Section 4 of
Resolution 85-128, assumed in a form acceptable to the County Attorney any
and all applicable commitments, responsibilities, and obligations pursuant to
the Development Order, including all special conditions of site plan approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
•
•
1. Notice of TranAfer of all of the subject property has been
properly filed with the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
prior to the transfer, and
2. The transferee, GHA Grand Harbor, Ltd., has properly
assumed in writing in a form acceptable to the County Attorney, any and all
applicable commitments, responsibilities, and obligations pursuant to the
Development Order by virtue of the attached "Notice of Transfer and
Assumption of Development Order Approvals and Obligations", and
3. The Board consents to the transfer, and the Clerk to the
Board of County Commissioners is authorized to file the attached "Notice of
Transfer and Assumption of Development Order Approvals and Obligations"
in the minutes of the' County Commission.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Eggert , and seconded by Commissioner Bowman , and
upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Ay e
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 6th day of August, 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By /G�-/ei(�.-d���t1
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
RESOLUTION 91-87 W/ATTACHED "NOTICE" IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
CLERK TO THE BOARD
18
CIO
T. Modification to Developer's Ag
The Board reviewed memo from
reement - CGN Subdivision
Attorney Collins:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: L William G. Collins II - Assistant County Attorney
DATE: July 26, 1991
SUBJECT: Modification to Developer'! Agreement - CGN Subdivision
•
Indian River County and the Developers of CGN Subdivision, a commercial
medical subdivision north of 37th Street, entered into a Developer's
Agreement dated June 5, 1990 relating to the construction of traffic
improvements (left -turn lane off 37th Street onto 12th Court) .
On July 11, 1991 the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended
modification of the agreement to extend the time for construction of the turn
lane, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department.
•
The modification allows an extension of time for construction of the turn
lane. Construction must be commenced by March 1, 1992 so that
construction may be completed by July 1, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the attached Modification to Developer's Agreement with CGN
Subdivision.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
Modification to Developer's Agreement with CGN
Subdivision.
TWO ORIGINALS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD - ONE
W/SIGNATURE OF VIRGINIA W. RUSSELL FOR DEVELOPER & THE OTHER
W/ALL REMAINING SIGNATURES FOR DEVELOPER.
U. Request for Date of Public Heating by Sheriff
The Board reviewed memo from Asst. County Attorney O'Brien:
19
AUG C H
Boor 8:3l,,l,E j1
AUG 6IL
BOOK 83 PAGE ads'
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney
DATE: July 30, 1991
RE: REQUEST FOR DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING
0
The Sheriff has requested that this office prepare the attached
ordinance which should assist the Sheriff in the war on drugs. A
similar ordinance was upheld in the Second Circuit (see attached news-
paper article) . •
The County looked at a different approach to the problem in 1989 when
it considered and rejected the establishment of a "Drug Nuisance Abate-
ment Board". It was apparently felt that the primary impact of "Board"
action would be against the innocent property owner rather than the
seller. A copy of the County's letter to the Sheriff is attached for
ease of reference.
The thrust of the "loitering in drug area" ordinance would be directed
to the illegal seller and buyer -of the controlled substances.
A date of August 27, 1991 is suggested for a public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to advertise a public hearing to be held on
August 27, 1991 on the proposed "loitering in drug
area" ordinance.
DISCUSSION OF REMOVAL OF BARRIER IN COUNTY R/W (MADELINE KAYE)
The Board reviewed memos from Attorney O'Brien as well as
memo from Public Works:
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
ATTN: Margaret Gunter, Administrative Secretary
FROM: _ Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant County Attorney
DATE: July 26, 1991
SUBJECT: MATTERS BY PUBLIC - IRC AGENDA 8/6/91
Madeline Kaye has requested to be placed on the Agenda for August 6,
1991. This concerns the removal of a barrier she erected in County
right-of-way. Back-up is attached.
20
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS'
1810 251h Sl"reel, Vero' Beach, Florida 32960
Telephone: (407) 567-8000
Sinton:: 221-1124
Ms. Madeline Kaye July 24, 1991
Post Office Box 217
Roseland, FL 32957
Dear Ms. Kaye:
It has come to the attention of the County that you may have erected a
barrier in County road right-of-way. The barrier in question is
located adjacent to your property on the street known es 78th Avenue
(Williams Street) which is a platted road right-of-way that is 35 feet
wide and runs along the south boundary of A.A. Berry Subdivision and
Roseland Lake No. 2 Subdivision.
If you have, In fact, placed a barrier in the County road right-of-way,
it is to be removed immediately. If you are not responsible for the
barrier please let me know at your earliest convenience so that the
County may remove the barrier.
To obstruct or close a County road right-of-way without County
authority is a serious matter and it can result in the imposition of
fines, other sanctions arid the requirements to pay attorney fees and
court costs.
CHARLES P. VITUNAC
C.any Anatomy
WILLIAM O. COLLINS 11
Aw. co.n., Ana.nee
SHARON PHILLIPS BRENNAN
Ant Cea.ap Attorney
Very truly yours,
Thrrence P. O'Brien
Assistant County Attorney
DATE:
TO:
July 9, 1991 •
William G. Collins, II, County Attorney's Office
FROM: •. W. A. "Bill" Meager, Construction Coordinat
SUBJECT: Blocked Right of Way
Memorandum to James W. Davis, Public Works Director,
• dated July 5, 1991.
le9Z5Zvi�L��
In response to your questions stated in the referenced memorandum;
,-Please note the following:
1) There have been no permits issued for this closing. If the
County Engineering Department authorizes a road closing, it
would be in direct connection to a utility project, road
construction project, or right of way clearing project and
authorized by both the Engineering Department and Traffic
Engineering. Such authorization is limited to a short period
of time and rarely exceeds eight to twelve hours in any given
day. Any other road closing requests must be authorized
through the Board of County Commissioners.
2) The street known as 78th Avenue (Williams Street) is a platted
road right of way that is 35 feet wide and runs along the
south boundary of A. A. Berry Subdivision and Roseland Lake
No. 2 Subdivision. The County currently has a maintained
drainage swale system located within 78th Avenue right of way
as shown on the attached map. All other areas of this right
of way are not currently maintained.
3j Yes. According to the attached schedule for the proposed
right of way ordinance, I believe Section 310.06 (1) (2), (6),
(c), and (g) could apply.
If you have any further questions in regard to this matter, contact
me at extension 280. I would like to discuss it.
21
ie'`
BOOK 8'3
FA:A:
Mi° 619
BOOK 83 FACE ;90
Madeline Kaye, 7840 128th Court, Roseland, came before the
Board and noted that she had a copy of her deed with her and also
has her survey, which she submitted for the Board to review. Ms.
Kaye advised that the reason she blocked off the road was because
for 4 months she and the lady who lives with her were harrassed
and verbally abused by the people who rented across from them and
who were drag racing and revving the motor of their pickup truck,
and making rude gestures, using profanity, etc. Their 4 -wheeler
actually jumped the barricade. Ms. Kaye advised that since the
woman who lives with her has angina and cannot tolerate this kind
of upset, she talked to Public Works Director Jim Davis, who
verbally gave her permission to close the road. She told him
that she would open it after all this was over with.
Ms. Kaye further noted that whenever the County comes down
to clean the ditch behind her, they will not go on the other side
of what they say is a 35' easement to clean the culvert on that
side because they say it is her private property; so she wants to
know just whose property it is. None of this makes sense to her,
and no one is ever in the Code Enforcement Office to answer
anything. Ms. Kaye informed the Board that the barricade has
been taken away since she heard from Attorney O'Brien, and she
would like to have the road maintained. There is no barricade,
but she does have posters on her fence because she doesn't need
the drag racing. These posters just say "No Trespassing," and
these are on her fence, and it is her property.
Commissioner Scurlock believed that if the barricade is
down, then there is no action being requested of the Board as far
as fines, etc., but apparently Ms. Kaye is indicating that she
would like some action from the County in regard to maintaining
the ditch.
Ms. Kaye stated that the ditch alongside of there that they
call the right-of-way is only 2i' deep, and she gets flooded from
that because she has a pond behind her that is about 60' deep,
and she is clearing off the water from everyone's land and then
they dug a culvert to drain off from Powerline.
Commissioner Scurlock wished clarification. He believed Ms.
Kaye barricaded 78th Avenue, and along that road is a ditch; he
wished to know if that is the ditch she would like to have
cleaned. Ms. Kaye confirmed that it is.
Commissioner Bowman believed that ditch is part of the R/W,
and Administrator Chandler noted that he was not aware there was
a problem with the ditch and would like to take a look at it.
Ms. Kaye then referred to the "swale" between Powerline and
128th Court, which runs in the middle of the property line and
emphasized that it is not even maintained, and that so-called
22
"swale" is a ditch which takes up more of that 35' easement there
to Powerline. She felt that was unnecessary and noted they left
a narrow road to get to Powerline, and the person who owns that
corner property gave her permission to go through. She is the
one who has maintained that road nobody else- and she does not
maintain it for a dragrace or profanity.
Chairman Bird suggested that we have the Administrator send
staff members out to look into this situation.
Commissioner Bowman felt that the County needs to look at
Ms. Kaye's deed.
Attorney Collins advised that there is a statement on the
face of the deed which says it is subject to a 35' easement for
public utilities and road R/W. WFhen the subdivision was platted,
there was a 35' R/W dedicated, but it has never been up to county
standards and it (the road) has never been accepted for mainte-
nance; although, the county has done some maintenance of the
swale along the road.
Commissioner Wheeler asked if we are not maintaining the
road, and Ms. Kaye stated that the County is not and further
claimed that she personally put in $4,000 worth of sand to build
that road and also put in a culvert so the fire department could
get through.
Attorney Collins pointed out that there are platted roads in
this county which are only paper streets and have trees growing
in them, but when a road is dedicated to the public, it is
available for people to pass over it, and they have a right to
walk down it whether or not it is up to county standards.
Ms. Kaye felt they do not hake a right to use it and be
abusive, and Attorney Collins stated that is a matter for the
Sheriff.
Commissioner Wheeler asked why the County couldn't barricade
the road, and Commissioner Scurlock noted that another option is
to abandon our right to that road. He felt if it is not an
easement, and we are not maintaining it, and it doesn't service
anyone but Ms. Kaye, it may be logical to abandon it.
Attorney Collins agreed that could be done, but that would
require a formal public hearing process.
Administrator Chandler believed that at this time, the road
in question is simply a paper road. We do need to look at the
R/W and the drainage ditch. We also need to address if the
street is needed in the future, and if there is drag racing, it
should be reported to the Sheriff.
Chairman Bird felt we should Idelay a few weeks to sort some
of this out and then have it brought back for further discussion.
24
AUG 6 199i
r`�l
BooK 83 FE 5`.•
AUG 6199
BOOK 83 A VE civ
The Board members had no objection, and the Chairman
directed Mrs. Forlani to notify Ms. Kaye when this matter will be
brought back on the agenda with a recommendation as to how we
should proceed:
ORDINANCE CREATING GLENDALE LAKES STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the Deputy
Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication
attached, to -wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann. Jr. who on oath
says that he is Busir'.•5s Manager of the Vero Beach Prr^-, Journal, a daily net, .paper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a �J) PUBLIC NOTICE
// The Board of County Commissioners of Wien
� 1f.1�ti)��� River CsdaFlorida, will conat a Pin the
in the matter of / on Tuesday. August 6. 1991 at 9:05 a.m. in the
Commission Chambers at 1840 25th Street, Vero
Beach. FL 32960, to consider the adoption of ordi-
nance entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY CREATING THE GLENDALE
. LAKES STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which
may be made at this meeting will need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made.
which Includes testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is based.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
• RICHARD N. BIRD, CHAIRMAN
July 9, 16, 23, 30, 1991 812225
in the
Iished in said newspaper In the issues of
Court, was pub -
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for te purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 110,_C-oth of
ct. 19
(SEAL)
)
<r '
(business Manager)
-(Cler ef-the...Circutt Gourt; Indian River
Co
n , Florida)
1 1 8?r.- 14-T,. 1. 'i.rlrL-
CrS..rn .. -...
Administrator Chandler reviewed the following memo:
24
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.p.,
, 4401) Public Works Directoror
SUBJECT: Ordinance Establishing the Glendale Lakes
Street Lighting District
DATE: June 24, 1991 FILE: gienord.jun
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On March 20, 1990, the Public Works Department received a
voluntary petition signed by S0% of the residents in
Glendale Lakes Subdivision requesting the County establish a
street lighting district.
At this time, staff has prepared the attached ordinance
establishing the District. The annual cost per parcel/acre
is $37.05.
A copy of the Ordinance creating Glendale Lakes Street
Lighting .District was sent to the Press Journal for
advertisement for four consecutive weeks in July.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Subject to comments by the public at the Public Hearing,
staff recommends approval of the Glendale Lakes Street
Lighting District.
The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard.
There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 91-38 creating the Glendale Lakes Street
Lighting District.
AUG X9'91
L
25
BOOK 83 f'A%c
9
AUG ,o `? ?
BOOK 83 P46E
ORDINANCE 91- 2/3
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
CREATING THE GLENDALE LAKES STREET
LIGHTING DISTRICT.
rin
WHEREAS, the residents of Glendale Lakes Subdivision have
requested that the County establish a mechanism for providing street
lighting service at crucial locations throughout the subdivision;
WHEREAS, the Board finds that. the creation of a municipal
service benefit unit to raise funds through the equitable assessment of
property owners throughout the subdivision is the best available means
of accomplishing the desired goal; and
WHEREAS, the provision of street lighting in the area will further
the safety, health and well-being of all those residing and owning
property within the boundaries of the district,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, that:
SECTION 1. Creation of Municipal Service Benefit Unit.
There is hereby established in Indian River County the Glendale
Lakes Municipal Service Benefit Unit under the authority of, and with
all those powers conferred by, the Constitution of the State of Florida,
Sections 125.01(q) and 125.01(r) of the Florida Statutes and Chapter
200 of the Indian River County Code County. The real property
included within the boundaries of this municipal service benefit unit is
described as follows:
Glendale Lakes as shown on the plat recorded in
Plat Book 6, Page 26, of the Public Records of
Indian River County, Florida and Glendale Lakes
Subdivision Unit Two as shown on the plat recorded
in Plat Book 9, Page 90, of the Public Records of
Indian River County, Florida.
All lying in Indian River County, Florida.
SECTION 2 LEVY.
The first non -ad valorem assessment shall be levied for
year 1992 - 1993.
SECTION 3.
Section 200.
"Glendale Lakes"
the tax
CHAPTER 200 AMENDMENT.
07 shall be amended to show the addition of the
district and this ordinance number.
26
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or if any sentence, paragraph, phrase, or word
of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, in-
operative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions
of this ordinance, and it shall be construed to have been the legislative
intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid or
inoperative part.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon becoming law.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, on this 6th day of August, 1991.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal
on the 9, 16, 23 and 30 of July, 1991, for a public hearing to be held
on the 6th day of August, 1991,.at which time it was moved for
adoption by Commissioner Eggert , seconded by Commissioner
Bo wm a n , and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Ay e
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
CONDEMNATION OF UNSAFE STRUCTURE 4056 OLD DIXIE
Building Director Ester Rymer made the following presenta-
tion:
27
AUG 61991
BOOK
PA6E 'r,
Pr -
AUG 6 1151
BOOK 8 3 FAal0CiD
TO: Mr. James E. Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: Mr. Robert M. Keating, AICPI MK
Community Development Director
DATE: July 10, 1991
SUBJECT: Condemnation of Unsafe Structure
Located at 4056 Old Dixie Highway
FROM: Ester L. Rymer, Dire or
Building Division
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of August 6, 1991
DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS
Subject structure has been condemned and ordered repaired or
removed; the building was posted with a notice and an attempt was
made to notify the owner by certified mail. We have determined
that the owner is deceased. Certified notices were sent to the
Attorney handling the probate and to the Representative (son) of
the estate. Notice was made only to the attorney. Legal Notice to
all unknown heirs was run in the Vero Beach Press Journal an two
separate dates. The taxes have not been paid on this property for
the years of 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990.
Said structure is not occupied; however, neighbors report that
vagrants have been using the property. This structure is
considered unsafe and detrimental to the health, safety, and
f; welfare of the general public.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners declare
said structure a nuisance, and order the building demolished by the
County Road and Bridge Department if men and equipment are
available.
After removal, in accordance with Section 4-21, Code of Ordinances,
Indian River County, the Board will cause a lien to be filed of
record for the costs of removal against the .owner or person in
charge.
Mrs. Rymer assured the Board that every attempt has been
made to notify all parties. We have had a lot of complaints
about this structure, and she would request that the Board direct
staff to proceed with having it demolished.
The Chairman determined that no one wished to be heard
regarding this matter.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commis-
sioner Bowman, the Board unanimously declared the structure
owned by the heirs of Willie Bell Davis and located at 4056
Old Dixie Highway a nuisance and directed that the building
be demolished as recommended by staff.
28
RESOLUTION REAUTHORIZING IMPOSITION OF COUNTYWIDE E911 FEE
Emergency Management Director Doug Wright reviewed the
following:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Emergency Management Services
DATE: July 23, 1991
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION REAUTHORIZING IMPOSITION OF
COUNTYWIDE E911 FEE
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein
be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at the next scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The Florida Legislature in 1991 passed legislation amending Chapter
365.171, revising provisions relating to the "911" fee which
permits county governments to impose a fee on all residential and
business telephone lines to pay for expenses associated with the
operation of the E911 system with a cap of $.50.
The revisions approved by the legislature provides for the
following actions:
1. Deletes the requirement for annual approval of a county's
recurring fee by the Division of Communications;
Specifies that a fund be established
fee revenues and expenditures;
exclusively for 911
3. Requires that moneys in the fund
specified purposes;
4. Requires an annual audit of the fund;
5. Provides for carry over of funds and specifies those
costs which are eligible for expenditure of "911" fee
revenues;
•
be used only for
6. Provides for expenditure of fees for two county
positions; prohibits certain expenditures, and
establishes legislativegoal.
In FY 90-91, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
approved imposition of the 911 fee per line per month to fund the
recurring and non-recurring charges related to operation of the two
Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP) in the County. The split
approved by the Florida Division of Communications and the County
for the year was $.44 recurring and $.04 non-recurring.
The revised law does not distinguish between recurring and non-
recurring in terms of the 911 fee. Staff has reviewed the revenue
the fee will generate in FY 91-92 and recommends the same fee as
the prior year at $.48 per line.
The matter is now before the Board of County Commissioners for
approval of the Resolution required to reauthorize the E911 fee for
FY 91-92.
29
AUG 61991
500K FAZIL
f;�
AUG ''991
BOOK 83 FA.1100Z
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
It is estimated that $285,000 will be generated by the $.48 E911
surcharge in FY 91-92. The funds will be utilized for staff
maintenance of the data base, operating expenditures, capital
outlay, and a contingency fund to ensure the integrity of the
system to timely direct emergency personnel so that the protection
of lives and property can be assured.
If approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the Resolution
will be forwarded to Southern Bell Telephone Company so that the
fee will be implemented effective October 1, 1991.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the resolution imposing the E911
surcharge with a $.48 fee for the next fiscal year.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 91-88 reauthorizing imposition of the
Countywide E911 Fee.
Commissioner Eggert noted that the recommendation is only to
reauthorize this fee for one year, and she believed the Legis-
lature has deleted the requirement for annual approval.
Director Wright explained they only deleted the approval by
the state; it is just approved at the county level from now on.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
It was voted on and carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION - 91-88
A RESOLUTION OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
COUNTYWIDE "E911" TELEPHONE FEE TO PAY FOR SYSTEM
CHARGES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Legislature enacted House Bill 1223 which amended
Section 365.711, Florida Statutes, entitled "The Florida Emergency
Telephone Act" to permit the imposition of a "911" fee on all
residential and business telephone lines; and
WHEREAS, this fee may be used to pay for all charges assessed
to the countywide "911" emergency telephone system; and
WHEREAS, this fee may not exceed $.50 per line, per month; and
WHEREAS, the "911" fee will generate revenue which will pay
the cost of providing such service throughout the County including
the various municipalities; NOW, THEREFORE,
30
AUG 6 1991
BOOK 3 ,'FAA101i
Section 6. SEVERABILITY
If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution
is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, then said holding shall in no way affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this Resolution.
Section 7. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Resolution shall become effective October 1, 1991.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner
Wheeler who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by
CommissionerScurlock
was as follows:
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote
Chairman Richard N. Bird
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and
adopted this 6th day of August , 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY /� s..,,ae
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
RESOLUTION ADOPTING COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY PLAN
The Board reviewed memo from John King, Deputy Director of
Emergency Services:
TO:
County Adminisrator
THROUGH: Doug Wright,` Director
Department of Emergency Services
FROM: John King, Deputy Director11
Department of Emergency Services
James Chandler
DATE: July 25, 1991
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY PLAN
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein
be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at the next scheduled meeting.
32
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That the Board of County Commissioners hereby
establishes a fee of $.48 per month per access line up to a maximum
of 25 access lines per account bill rendered. This fee shall be in
effect for 12 months from the effective date of this Resolution at
which time it shall be reviewed by the Board prior to the beginning
of fiscal year 1992-93.
Section 2. That in accordance with the provisions of Section
365.171, Florida Statutes, Southern Bell Telephone Company shall
collect such fees less an administrative fee of an amount equal to
one percent (1%)of the total "911" fee collected by Southern Bell.
Section 3. That in accordance with the provisions of Section
365.171, Florida Statutes, Southern Bell shall provide to the
County on quarterly basis a list of the names, addresses, and
telephone numbers of any and all subscribers who have identified to
Southern Bell their refusal to pay the "911" fee.
Section 4. That pursuant to the authority set forth within
Section 365.171, Florida Statutes, Indian River County hereby
indemnifies and holds harmless Southern Bell Telephone Company
against liability for damages resulting from or in connection with
"911" service or identification of telephone numbers, addresses, or
names associated with any person accessing "911" service, except if
Southern Bell acts with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting
wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety or property in
providing such services.
Section 5. That the Board hereby authorizes that a letter be
sent to Southern Bell notifying them of the imposition of the fee,
that the fees shall be collected by Southern -Bell less an
administrative fee, that Southern Bell shall provide the County
with the above -referenced list and request written acknowledgement
from Southern Bell regarding the imposed fees and other matters set
forth within the letter.
31
1991
BOOK 140
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
•
On July 3, 1991, the Department of Emergency Services received
State approval for the Indian River County Hazardous Materials
Emergency Plan which was submitted March 1, 1991, to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs, Division of Hazardous Materials.
The submitted plan is measured against compliance criteria
established by provisions of Section 303 (g) of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) and
administrative rulings by the State Emergency Response Commission.
The Board of County Commissioners' adoption of the plan finalizes
grant agreement 91EP-72-10-40-22-031 between Indian River County
and the Department of Community Affairs, which began October 16,
1990.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
Recognizing the threat that hazardous materials pose to both the
population and the environment, the State Legislature has extended
funding authorizations to reimburse counties for resources required
to update and maintain an operationally functional hazardous
materials reponse plan. As the number of qualifying facilities
subject to SARA reporting increases, on-site inspections and
population protection measures are determined and added to the
plan.
The Florida Administrative Code requires that each county
government have a current hazardous material emergency response
plan that specifically defines governmental agency authorities and
responsiblities within the framework of the County's emergency
reponse. Adoption of the 1991 plan will serve as replacement of the
1990 plan and includes a nearly 40% increase in identified
hazardous material sites.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the
attached Resolution and the 1991 Indian River County Hazardous
Material Emergency Plan. Pusuant to approval, the plan will be
disseminated to the various emergency agencies within the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 91-89 approving the Indian River County
Hazardous Materials Emergency Plan.
BOOK 83 PAGE
AUG
J'j
BOOK 83 p,,,,poc
RESOLUTION NO. 91- 89
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ADOPTING AND
APPROVING THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY PLAN.
WHEREAS, Chapter 252, Florida Statutes, assigns to the Board of
County Commissioners responsibility for disaster mitigation, preparedness,
response, and recovery; and
WHEREAS, .with the enactment of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right -to -Know Act of 1986, Congress imposed upon local
emergency planning committees and local governments additional planning and
preparedness requirements for response to emergencies involving the release
of hazardous materials; and
WHEREAS, each county within a Local Emergency Planning District is
required to develop an Emergency Response Plan for Hazardous Materials to
become a component part of the local Emergency Planning District Plan; and
WHEREAS, this plan is intended to provide the framework for the
development of detailed operating procedures by first response public safety
agencies charged with the responsibility of protecting the public's health and
safety from the discharge or release of extremely toxic chemicals;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the 1991
Indian River County Hazardous Materials Plan is hereby adopted.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Wheel e r
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner S cur 1 o c k , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Ay e
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Ay e
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Ay e
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 6th day of August
Jeffrey K. Barton Clerk/ 2) e Chairman
44"(- /rLrJ t i
, 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Richard N. Bird
* aYhe official 1991 INDIAN RIVER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCY
PLAN IS ON FILE IN THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
34
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COUNTY 1991 PEACETIME EMERGENCY PLAN
The Board reviewed memo from John King, Deputy Director of
Emergency Services:
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
James Chandler
County Adminis rator
Doug Wright, irector
Emergency Management Ser?,ices
John King, Deputy Director 31(
Emergency Management Services
July 25, 1991
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1991 COUNTY PEACETIME
EMERGENCY PLAN
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein
be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at the next scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
Annually, the Indian River County Department of
reviews the County's Peacetime Emergency Plan
and operational soundness.
Emergency Services
(PEP) for accuracy
The annual review of the PEP is measured against compliance
requirements outlined in Rule 9G-4, Florida Administrative Code.
However, the Plan must be adopted by resolution of the governing
body of the County before it meets compliance requirements of Rule
9G-6, FAC.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: '
The Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Emergency
Management, requires an update triennially, which was accomplished
in 1990. In an effort to maintain an operationally functional plan,
the Department of Emergency Services updates the plan annually and
then submits it for review and approval by the State at the
required interval.
Florida is subject to natural and technological hazards that pose
potential dangers to the community. State directives require that
each county government provide a comprehensive emergency management
plan for the purpose of defining the specific authorities and
responsibilities that are delineated within the framework of the
County's emergency response.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the
attached Resolution and the 1991IIndian River County Peacetime
Emergency Plan. Pursuant to approval, the plan will be disseminated
to the various emergency agencies within the County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 91-90 approving the County 1991 Peacetime
Emergency Plan.
3
N6 6 1991
Root 8 3 FA,E
0 7,
BOOK 83 PAGE O8
RESOLUTION NO. 91- 90
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ADOPTING A
PEACETIME EMERGENCY PLAN FOR INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, Chapter 252, Florida Statutes, Disaster Preparedness Act,
establishes a Division of Emergency Management (DIVISION) and prescribes
the powers and responsibilities thereof; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 252, F.S., assigns to the. Board of County
Commissioners responsibility for disaster mitigation, preparedness, response,
and recovery; and
WHEREAS, Rule 9-G-6, Florida Administrative Code, requires submission
by Indian River County (COUNTY) to the DIVISION of a triennial update of
the COUNTY's Peacetime Emergency (PEP) Plan*; and
WHEREAS, Rule 9-G-6, F.A.C., requires that after determination by
the DIVISION that the COUNTY's plan is in compliance, that the COUNTY
pass a resolution officially adopting the PEP Plan for Indian River County;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the 1991
'as approved bythe DIVISION,
COUNTY's PEP Plan,
triennial update of thePP
P
is hereby adopted.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner F g g P r t
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner B o w m a n , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Ay e
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Ay e
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this
6th day of
August , 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Jeffry K. Barton, C
Richard N. Bird
Chairman
* `I' he official TRIENNIAL UPDATE OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
PEACETIME EMERGENCY PLAN IS ON FILE IN THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
36
CONTINUANCE OF 64 LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
The Board reviewed memo from) Public Works Director Davis:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Continuance of Six Cent Local
Option Gas Tax
DATE: . -: July 24, 1991
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Transportation Planning Committee, the five (5)
municipalities within the County and the Public Works Department
Staff concur that continuance of the six cent Local Option Gas
Tax (LOGT) Program is needed fpr the next five year period
(September 1, 1991 to August 31, 1996). The attached ordinance
and sample Interlocal Agreement has-been prepared to effect the
continuance.
The LOGT distribution formula will remain the same as previously
applied and is as follows:. _
Percentage of total revenu allocated to each eligible
entity = 1/3 of the entity's percentage of total equivalent
lane miles of road + 1/3 of the entity's percentage of
transportation expenditures ;over the previous five year +
1/3 of the entity's total percentage of population residing
in the area based upon the 1990 census.
•
For example, from the attached ch.rt, Indian River County's share
should be computed.as follows:
Percentage of total revenue allocated to Indian River County
= 1/3 (69.90%) + 1/3 (66.93%) + 1/3 (64.5%) = 67.13%
In applying the above formula to all eligible entity's, the
following percentages, rounded to the nearest tenth, are derived:
Indian River City of City of City of Town of Indian Town of
County Vero Beach Fellsmere Sebastian River Shores Orchid
67.11%
19.03% 1.98%
10.83%
1.05% 0.0033%
The annual funds proposed for distribution to each entity for the
six cent of local option gas tax, would amount to the following:
Proceeds from the Six Cent Local Option Gas Tax
Indian River
County
$2,010,121
AUG 6
City of
Vero Beach
City of
Fellsmere
City of
Sebastian
Town of Indian Town of
River Shores Orchid
$569,999
$59,306
37
$324,387
$31,451 $99 -
BOOK PA,E
9
AFDC 619
BOOK 83 F,1r . 1 ,
Alternatives include increased Traffic Impact Fees, increased
advalorem taxes, or special assessments.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that a Public Hearing be conducted on the
proposed ordinance on August 20, 1991 and approval of the draft
Interlocal Agreement. In addition, staff recommends that the
Chairman be authorized to execute each, Interlocal Agreement with
the five municipalities as received from the municipality.
Commissioner Scurlock advised that at the TPC meeting there
was some question raised by the Town of Orchid in reference to
participation in this tax, and he just wanted the record to
reflect that they raised the question and they want some dollars
out of this.
It was pointed out that they are listed, and we will note
their concern.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously directed that
a public hearing be conducted on the proposed ordinance
and the draft interlocal agreement on August 20, 1991,
as recommended by staff.
REQUEST TO ACCEPT MAINTENANCE OF PORTION OF 107TH ST. FELLSMERE
The Board reviewed memo from Public Works Director Davis:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT:
of a Portion of 107th Street - Fellsmere
Request by Mr. Frank Sidoti to Accept Maintenance
DATE: July 26, 1991 FILE: 107st.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Periodically, the County is requested to accept unmaintained
roads for County maintenance. Roads to be accepted must
meet the current Evaluation of Acceptance Criteria based on
a point system which takes into consideration conditions of
the road, drainage, right-of-way width, school bus routes,
and a number of parameters. Mr. Frank Sidoti of 107th
Street has requested that the County accept maintenance of
107th Street, Ditch 9, Fellsmere.
38
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Staff has inspected the road right-of-ways and drainage
system and hasevaluated their request, enclosed is a copy
of our evaluation, which resulted in a numerical score of 50
points. At this time, the minimum score which warrants
county staff approval recommendation is 100 points.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Public Works staff does not recommend that the County accept.
maintenance of the road at this time.
Commissioner Bowman informed the Board that she personally
drove over this road after the rains, and it was in better shape
than the dirt road she lives on. She saw no problem with it
whatever, and there is only one house on it.
Chairman Bird believed that staff has advised that their
evaluation of this road does not meet the County requirements.
He further noted that Mr. Sidoti is not present to pursue his
request.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously accepted staff's
recommendation not to accept maintenance of the above
described road.
AGREEMENT W/MOSQUITO CONTROL DIST.- MANAGEMENT IMPOUNDMENT 22
Capital Projects Manager Thompson reviewed the following:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: Roger D. Cain, P.E. r---
County Engineer
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E. er-
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Agreement for Implementation of
Rotational Impoundment Management Plan
Impoundment 22
DATE: July 26, 1991
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Attached is an agreement between the County and the Indian
River Mosquito Control District (IRMCD) for the Management
of Impoundment 22.
Mitigation for the wetlands impacts of the County's Indian
River Boulevard North Extension, Phase III and Phase IV
construction from SR 60 to 53rd Street, includes
implementation of a Rotational Impoundment Management Plan
AUG
3 9 BOOK 63 FAG/o11
k+
BOOK 83 FACE IVO?
for Indian River. County Impoundment 22. The Indian River
Mosquito Control District would like to operate and maintain
the impoundment to provide mosquito control in that area.
The attached Agreement provides for the IRMCD to construct
the proposed pumping station, culverts and bleed -down
structures in accordance with all regulatory permits at the
County's expense. The IRMCD will be responsible for
operation and maintenance costs associated with the
completed system. Exhibit A to the Agreement, "Final
Management Plan for Indian River County Impoundment 22", is
on file in the Board's office.
Compensation for Tasks I, II, III & IV shall not exceed the
"Anticipated Cost" for each task up to a maximum total
not -to -exceed price of $75,012. Compensation for Tasks V,
VI and VII shall be negotiated and mutually agreed upon by
the IRMCD and the County prior to authorization to proceed
with these tasks. The preliminary estimate for Tasks V, VI
and VII is $56,000.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Alternative No. 1
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement as
written.
Alternative No. 2
Re -negotiate contract terms.
RECOIETDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of Alternate No. 1. Funding is
from Fund 309 -Indian River Boulevard North.
Ms. Thompson informed the Board that although all this
construction will be done at the County's cost, once everything
is built, all the costs associated with operation and maintenance
of the impoundment will be with the District.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to execute the Agreement with the
Mosquito Control District re management of Impound-
ment 22.
AGREEMENT W/MANAGEMENT PLAN ATTACHED IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
CLERK TO THE BOARD.
40
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING AGREEMENT W/PSI-I.R.BLVD III
The Board reviewed memo from the Capital Projects Manager:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: Roger D. Cain, P.E., County Engineer
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E. 1
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Construction Materials Testing
Indian River Boulevard Phase III
IRC LOI 91-81
DATE: July 29, 1991 FILE: irbtest.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Staff has successfully negotiated terms of an agreement with
Professional Services Industries, Inc. (PSI)/Jammal Division
for construction materials testing services during
construction of Indian River Boulevard Phase III.
The attached agreement outlines the specific services to be
provided. Compensation will be on a unit price basis for
the actual amount of testing performed and technical time
expended up to a maximum total "Not to Exceed" budget of
$50,000.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Alternative No. 1
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement as
written.
Alternative No. 2
Re -Negotiate contract terms.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of Alternate
from 309 -Indian River Boulevard North.
No. 1. Funding is
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to execute the Agreement with PSI for
construction materials testing services as recommended
by staff at a not -to -exceed budget of $50,000.
SAID AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD.
'W
41
Boor 83 FAA 3
AUG c19'91
BOOK 83, F',441.4
APPRAISAL SERVICES - OSLO ROAD/OLD DIXIE IMPROVEMENTS
The Board reviewed memo from the Capital Projects Manager,
as follows:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Appraisal Services for Oslo
Highway Improvements
DATE: July 22, 1991 FILE:
Road/Old Dixie
oslo-od.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Appraisal services are required for proposed right-of-way
takings on Oslo Road from US 1 to 500' west of Old Dixie
Highway and on Old Dixie Highway for a distance of
approximately 500' north and south of Oslo Road.
Staff has requested proposals from three firms as follows:
Firm Fee Time
George P. Kmetz Appraisal Svcs.
Napier Appraisal Svcs.
Armfield-Wagner Appraisal
& Research, Inc.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
$6,100
$11,700
$13,800
90 days
180-240 days
45 days
' Staff recommends that the County contract with George P.
Kmetz Appraisal Services at the low quoted fee of $6,100.
Funding to be from Account 101-156-541-067.25 - Impact Fee
District 6 Oslo Road.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED
by Commissioner Eggert, to contract with George P.
Kmetz Appraisal Services at the low quoted fee of
$6,100 as recommended by staff.
Chairman Bird commented that he is not that familiar with
this firm and, in fact, couldn't even find them in the yellow
pages. He assumed staff has some criteria whereby they feel this
appraiser is qualified.
Manager Thompson advised that this firm has done other work
for us, and they have submitted references.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
It was voted on and carried unanimously.
42
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF I.R.BLVD PHASE III PER BID 91-89
The Board reviewed memo from Capital Projects Manager
Thompson:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.,(:::9
Public Works Director
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard Phase III
IRC Bid #91-89
DATE: July 24, 1991
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
At the meeting of July 9, 1991, the Board of County
Commissioners awarded subject project to the low bidder,
Sheltra & Sons Construction Co.,. Inc., in the amount of
$2,743,809.15.
Presented are five (5) sets of contract documents with
appropriate. Public Construction Bond and Certificate of
.Insurance .
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to
execute the contract documents.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to execute contract with Sheltra & Sons
Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $2,743,809.15
for the construction of Indian River Boulevard Phase
III per Bid 91-89.
CONTRACT DOCUMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE
BOARD.
BOOK 83 F4,-./.4-5
43
Pr -
BOOK 83 FAuEOI C
I.R.BLVD. PHASE III - DER PERMIT & AGREEMENT FOR EXOTIC SPECIES
REMOVAL
The Board reviewed memo from the Capital Projects Manager:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: Roger D. Cain, P.E. ee�
County Engineer FRO: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard Phase III
DER Permit No. 311423739
Long -Term Agreement for Exotic Species Removal
DATE: July 29, 1991
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) Permit for
construction of Indian River Boulevard Phase III requires
that the County submit and have approved a program for
removal of Brazilian Pepper and Melaleuca from Impoundment
22. In addition, the County is required to enter into a
long-term agreement with the DER ensuring that the exotic
species removal is included in perpetuity as part of the
management of the impoundment.
The attached long-term agreement includes an exotic plant
removal plan (Exhibit A) that has been approved by the DER.
Specific Condition No. 9 of DER Permit No. 311423739
requires that the County execute this long-term agreement
prior to the start of construction.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the County execute the attached
agreement with the DER. Funding from 309 -Indian River
Boulevard North.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, seconded by Com-
missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to execute agreement with the DER for
permit and removal of exotic species in conjunction
with construction of Indian River Boulevard Phase III.
PARTIALLY SIGNED COPY OF SAID AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE
OF CLERK TO THE BOARD.
44
RFPS - UPDATING OF EXISTING UTILITY MASTER PLANS (UTILITIES)
Utilities Director Pinto reviewed the following:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
PREPARED
AND STAFFED
BY:
SUBJECT:
JULY 22, 1991
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR OF UTIL SERVICES
WILLIAM F. McCAIN
CAPIT ENGINEER
DEPAR F UTIL Y SERVICES
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR UPDATING OF EXISTING
UTILITY MASTER PLANS
BACKGROUND
On June 4, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners reviewed an
Agenda Item recommending the updating of the existing utility Master
Plans (see attached memo and meeting minutes). After review. of this
memo and a lengthy discussion, the Utilities Department was directed
to prepare a scope of services in the form of an RFP (Request for
Proposals) to bring back to the Commission for approval.- The
Utilities Department is now prepared to do this.
,ANALYSIS
In the attached RFP, we have outlined major changes that have
contributed to the need for updating the existing Master Plans. The
review entails both an engineering and an economic analysis to
better assist Utilities in capital project planning, as well as in --
the review of private development projects. Also included in the
RFP is a statement disallowing the successful engineering firm from
designing any projects identified in the subsequent Master Plans.
This particular restriction requires very serious consideration
prior to its inclusion in the final RFP, as it could potentially
limit the number of interested firms.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners authorize an RFP to update all utility
Master Plans and negotiate with the selected engineering firms.
Director Pinto commented that as staff has rewritten the
scope, it severely restricts the ability of the engineering firm
which does the updating of the master plans to participate in the
design of any projects identified in the master plan.
Commissioner Scurlock referred to staff recommendation
regarding permission to negotiate with the selected firm and
commented that he thought generally after the RFP.went out on the
street, it came back to the Board before we went to negotiations.
Administrator Chandler stated that there is no question but
that this would follow our usual process, and Director Pinto
BOOK 83 FAtJ.U.L i
45
AUG g91
BOCK 83 Daris
clarified that when staff said "selected," it meant after the
Board has selected the firms.
In further discussion, it was confirmed that this would just
authorize staff to go out with RFPs and then follow our normal
procedure, and the big issue is whether the firm selected would
be disqualified for further participation in designing any future
projects.
Director Pinto noted that the down side of that restriction
is that you will limit the firms that will apply for this type of
work because they would prefer design work rather than planning
work, but he felt there are enough qualified firms out there that
we will be able to get a qualified firm. He pointed out that
after they are selected and have updated the plans, this would
put them in a very independent position to state how anything
done by the engineer that is selected to do the design would
affect the master plan. In that sense, they are totally
independent, and he felt in that sense the pros outweigh the
cons.
Discussion continued as to the benefits and the disadvan-
tages of this approach, and Commissioner Scurlock pointed out
that this restriction could eliminate a firm from further
participation in design for many years.
Director Pinto clarified that we are saying that if they do
the master plan, they don't design anything in it; however, they
do continue as the master plan consultants, and if someone should
suggest a deviation from the master plan, they would make a
recommendation.
Commissioner Eggert wished an explanation of just how these
consultants would be used and when.
Commissioner Scurlock believed that staff could address any
minor deviation, but if it is something more important, then the
consultant could be brought in to address how it would affect the
master plan. The question of the possible effect of a major
rezoning arose.
Administrator Chandler felt a large part of that would be
covered in our existing Comprehensive Plan and projected land
uses,. but Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that an increase in
population affects the size of the lines you need.
Commissioner Eggert felt that decision would be made in the
first update of the master plan, but Director Pinto brought up
the possibility that somebody may want to put a small development
in an area where the plan calls for a 24" line. In that type
situation, we must decide if we build something that just
services them or whether we possibly should change the plan to
build a dual line or just how to approach this. He explained
46
that you design a line map regardless of streets - it is based on
pressure and capacity and a change on one street could affect
lines many streets away.
Commissioner Eggert noted that she is just trying to get a
feeling for how much this consultant would be used and if the
proposed restriction is fair.
Commissioner Scurlock stated that his feeling about this is
that forever is a long time; he personally felt they should be
released from this restriction and able to participate at some
time.
Director Pinto suggested the restriction apply as long as
they continue as your master plan consultant, or at least until
you update. Then if they do the update, he felt they still
should be restricted.
Commissioner Eggert believed we are constantly updating, and
Commissioner Scurlock felt we should select a consultant for a
period of 3 to 5 years and then go back out for bids.
Administrator Chandler believed the life of a total master
plan would be 3 to 5 years. He understood Commissioner Eggert's
comment about constantly updating, but his thinking is that an
update would be a total update of all the elements in the plan.
Commissioner Eggert still didn't see why it isn't good for
longer if we are continually adjusting it for things such as
affordable housing, zoning, etc.
Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that there are some things
in the plan that change just based on technical advances, and
then there are also philosophical changes. For instance, you
might have a new Commission that wanted to go to using deep wells
instead of concentrating on reuse or possibly would want to
create artificial wetlands, and that would change our approach
dramatically.
Debate continued regarding a major update as opposed to a
partial or minor update which could be handled by staff, and the
definition of update. As Director Pinto understood the discus-
sion, he felt that you would not have a major update unless you
have a philosophical change in approach and a policy change. If
the Commission is looking for a time period, he personally would
say that as Tong as they are retained as consultant for the
master plan, they would be restricted and then when they are
dismissed is when the time period would start, i.e., 2 years
after they are dismissed.
AUG 6199
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously author-
ized the RFP to update all .utility master plans with
47
BOOK 83 FAG1.01
PU6 1991
BOOK ' d
the modification that the consulting firm selected
to do the update will serve on an on-going basis
until we terminate them, and then they cannot
participate in any of the projects for a period of
2 years from the time of their termination.
REMOVAL OF CITY OF SEBASTIAN FROM THE COUNTY UTILITY SERVICE AREA
The Board reviewed memo from Capital Projects Engineer
William McCain:
DATE:
TO:
JULY 22, 1991
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY 'ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR OF UTI. y'' RVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F.
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PRO
BY: DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT:
ILITY SERVICES
NORTH COs UTILITIES (I.E., REMOVAL OF THE CITY OF
SEBASTIAN FROM THE COUNTY UTILITY SERVICE AREA)
BACKGROUND
On May 14, 1991, the Utilities Department brought the attached
Agenda Item (and minutes) to the Board of County Commissioners
entitled NORTH COUNTY UTILITIES (I.E., SEWER COLLECTION AND WATER
DISTRIBUTION). Due to recent developments in the City of Sebastian,
it appears as if they are revoking our existing franchise.
Therefore, we are again seeking direction from the Board of County
Commissioners as to how to proceed.
ANALYSIS
As previously stated, the basic study phase of both the North County
sewer and water projects are complete. However, in order to proceed
with these projects, we are requesting authorization to eliminate
the City of Sebastian from our planned service area and proceed with
the design of both projects.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the elimination of the City of
Sebastian from these projects so that we may proceed.
Commissioner Eggert found the recommendation a bit
confusing. She believed Director Pinto had said to her that we
still have to figure out sewer, but this is really for water.
Director Pinto confirmed that water is the primary concern
right now; however, sewer is certainly a concern also. Because
we already have some lines installed and a lot of the plan has
48
been done, the sewer is not
original design, the county
can be cut out and designed
with sewer without worrying
We are recommending, however
inside Sebastian.
Commissioner Eggert noted that she did not want to read in
the paper that we approved the elimination of Sebastian from
these projects and have them thinking we just left the pipes
there. She felt we should be very clear as to what we are
approving.
Commissioner Scurlock explained that there are basically two
issues. When it comes to water, we don't have a plant or
anything; so, this is one way of putting them on notice that we
have to get on with our life - we are planning a system and since
nothing is in the ground with water, we are going to proceed
without you. In regard to the wastewater, he felt the door
should be left somewhat open in case they should come in shortly
and say we have abandoned our idea of doing this on our own. He
personally doubted this will happen and emphasized that we just
can't wait two years for them to make up their mind.
Chairman Bird asked what the latest official word is from
Sebastian, and Commissioner Scurlock believed they selected a
firm to do a study and the City Council has indicated they wish
to get in the utilities business, but they have not yet
determined how they wish to proceed; they actually are still
formulating their plan.
Director Pinto advised that we have customers on both ends
of Sebastian who have paid for service on our sewer system. In
as pressing an issue. In our
areas north and south of Sebastian
separately, and we can service them
about inside the City of Sebastian.
, not selling any more capacity
the water area we have some small utilities
major concerns over their future operation.
good shape when we took them over. We have
that we have some
They were not in
hired a consultant to
do a customer service study to see what size utility we have to
build in that area, but we cannot do this with Sebastian sitting
on the fence. He stressed that Sebastian has said specifically
we don't want your service, and we have county customers who we
have to service.
Commissioner Scurlock further noted that from the environ-
mental standpoint, if we hadn't gone ahead with our project, we
would have 3 operations in the North County dumping their sewage
directly into the river with no solution other than to continue
and be fined; so, at least we were able to handle those.
Discussion continued about the possibility of including
Sebastian in the future, but Commissioner Scurlock explained that
every time we expand service in our area that may affect their
49
AUG 000
BOOK 83 FArr 21
AUG ,8 ` 1991
BOOK 83 FAG.
potential for participation. We are sizing things and doing
certain improvements, and at some point, that will exclude them
from even the possibility of hooking up into our system.
Commissioner Eggert noted that although we have given Sebastian
a lot of warning, possibly we should allow them 30 to 60 days,
but Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that they said they want to
get out.
Commissioner Eggert suggested a Motion to eliminate
Sebastian from all water projects and the approval to finalize
negotiations for the elimination of the City from the wastewater
service within 30 days.
Discussion continued at some length, and Director Pinto
stressed that we have a serious problem with the water; we have
got to tie those little water plants together. As to the
wastewater, he felt we must see that the people we have committed
to get service unless Sebastian says we are not to, but we will
not sell any more capacity.
Commissioner Scurlock further clarified that when any
capacity is turned back to us, it will be transferred into the
unincorporated area.
Chairman Bird did not wish to bring up the specter of a
moratorium, but he felt the people should understand there may be
a problem with continuing development if they can't tie into our
system and the City's system isn't ready.
Commissioner Scurlock commented that actually we have plenty
of demand for capacity in the unincorporated area; so, if the
City does want a relationship with the County in the future, they
better establish that very quickly and tell us on what basis. We
cannot leave this open forever.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously agreed to
eliminate Sebastian from all water projects as of
now and from the wastewater service within 30 days
if we hear nothing to indicate they wish to be
included.
OLD SUGAR MILL ESTS. (WATER SERVICE 50TH COURT)
The Board reviewed memo from Utilities Assessment Manager
James Chastain:
50
DATE: JULY 29, 1991
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATO
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR OF UTI ' ERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHASTAIN`
AND STAFFED 'MANAGER OF ASSES T P• R• OJECTS
:BY: .DEPARTMENT OF UT ,.,ITY SERVICES
*SUBJECT:
50TH COURT - OLD SUGAR MILL ESTATES WATER SERVICE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -90 -24 -DS
BACKGROUND
On November 6, 1990, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved the petition for water service on 50th
Court/Old Sugar Mill Estates Subdivision. Engineering design has'
been completed by the Department of Utility Services staff. We are
now ready to begin the assessment process associated with this
project. (See attached agenda item and minutes of the above
meeting.)
.',ANALYSIS
Attached please find Resolutions 1 and 2 for the assessment project.
The total estimated cost to be assessed is $36,777.00. The cost per
square foot is $0.1016, and the project will serve the 16 properties
bordered on 50th Court, south of 16th Street. Of the properties
benefiting, 69% of the owners executed the petition.
The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment
project.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolutions and
set the assessment hearing date.
Director Pinto wished to know if we are talking about
allowing this assessment to be paid over 10 years at 9 3/4%, and
Administrator Chandler advised that we would propose this be on
the same basis as what we have just approved on the other water
extensions.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolutions 91-91 and 91-92 providing for installa-
tion of water service for 50th Court in OldSugar
Mill Estates and setting a time and place for the
public hearing.
51
6 i991
BOOKC�;j F'A� %2;3
Pr -
AUG 61991
BOOIF 83 p4a24
RESOLUTION NO. 91- 91
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR INSTALLATION OF
WATER SERVICE IN OLD SUGAR MILL ESTATES
(50TH COURT) ; PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTI-
MATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESS-
MENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY
SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has determined that the improvements herein described are
necessary to promote the public welfare of the county and has deter-
mined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
RESOLUTION NO. 91- 92
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH
THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN OLD SUGAR MILL
ESTATES (50TH COURT), AND OTHER
INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE
HEARD AS . TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABIL-
ITY OF CONSTRUCTING A WATERLINE
EXTENSION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO
THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS
TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY
ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED
THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has, by Resolution No. Q1_91 , determined that it is necessary
for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as
RESOLUTIONS 91-91 AND 91-92 ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO
THE BOARD IN THEIR ENTIRETY.
EXCLUSION OF CASH MAINTENANCE BOND ON COUNTY -MANAGED PROJECTS
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Engineer Oster:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
`STAFFED AND
',PREPARED BY: H. D. "D •STER, P.E.
-ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
JULY 30, 1991
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TERRANCE G. PINTO
• DIRECTOR OF UTIL M RVI
•
SUBJECT: CASH MAINTENANCE BOND
PACKGROUND:
As a condition of any permit by the County to a party allowing open
cutting of hard -surfaced County roads, there is a cash bond
required, which is to be valid for one year from completion of the
open cut. The cash "bond" is in the amount of $1,000.00 per lane,
up to $4,000.00, then an irrevocable letter of credit for any amount
in excess of $4,000.00.
In County Utilities projects, a maintenance bond for a year is
already required. This cash bond is an additional bonding:of the
same work, and will place an additional cost, to the Utilities
_Department, which will subsequently increase the cost to our,
customers.
RtECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners exclude the
requirement for the cash bond on all County -managed projects, so
long as a maintenance bond is furnished.
Director Pinto stressed that in this situation they are
paying twice, and he would like to say let's either require one
bond or the other but not both.
Administrator Chandler felt we can eliminate the cash bond
portion of it as it relates to utility projects and utility
contractors as long as it is clear that the maintenance bond
would cover us.
Commissioner Eggert personally preferred the cash bond, and
Administrator Chandler agreed it is more difficult to draw upon a
bond rather than having the cash in hand; however, in this case,
since a maintenance bond is already required for utilities, there
would be a duplication.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved
53
AUG 61911
BOOK 83 f�1.;F 25
r
AUG 6 19
BOOK 8:3 FACE
staff recommendation to exclude the requirement for
the cash bond on all County -managed projects so long
as a maintenance bond is furnished.
BLUE CYPRESS COMMUNITY SEWAGE IMPROVEMENT
Utilities Director Pinto made the following presentation:
DATE: JULY 29, 1991
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PI
DIRECTOR OF U
PREPARED
AND STAFFED
BY:
Y SERVICES
ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
.DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: `' BLUE CYPRESS COMMUNITY SEWAGE IMPROVEMENT
IRC PROJECT NO. US -90 -01 -DC -CS
BACKGROUND
On November 6, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners approved an
agreement with Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc., to provide
engineering services for the above -referenced project. (See Attachment
No. 1.)
A critical part of this project is the site location for the
wastewater treatment plant. After investigation, the first choice site
was unobtainable without possible condemnation. A second choice site
has been investigated and negotiations have been concluded with the
owner. (See Attachment No. 2.) During selection of the site, some
additional services which are part of the County's responsibility in
survey and subsurface investigation were necessary in determining
suitability and feasibility of the site prior to negotiations with the
landowner.
During the meeting with the landowner, on July 3, 1991, the
landowner expressed his concerns with obtaining a long term
Agricultural Pumping Permit from St. Johns River Water Management
District (SJRWMD) to continue pumping the proposed site. The testing
requirements of the SJRWMD Permit would make it economically unfeasible
for the landowner to continue his pumping practices. The pumping would
be essential to the initially proposed spray irrigation effluent
disposal system. Without pumping, the irrigation area would become
submersed land, and spray irrigation system technology could not be
applied. The landowner has offered 20 acres for sale and will donate an
additional 29 acres to support an artificial wetlands disposal system.
The Planning and Zoning Department requires that a minimum of 20
acres be acquired for the project in the subject area of zoning AG -3.
(See Attachment No. 3.) The minimum 20 -acre requirement (zone AG -3) is
triggering a Management and Storage of Surface Water Permit (MSSW).
Also, since current site pumping by the landowner is eliminated, the
MSSW Permit will be necessary. This requirement will increase
administrative, permitting and engineering consultant costs.
As a result of the above-mentioned proposal, the consultant must
change the design of the effluent disposal system from the original
spray irrigation system to an artificial wetland system with no direct
discharge to the lake or natural marsh by the lake. Using the design
capacity and considering the environmental impact in the area, it is
required that approximately 40 acres of wetland be created. The cost
to acquire the site, wetland area, and mitigation area property is
$20,000.00.
54
To compare with the artificial wetland system, the spray
irrigation system, if so desired, would require a pumping system to
lower the ground water. The design and construction cost of this
pumping system, at the minimum, would add $100,000.00 to the cost of
the project (with back-up pumps, required by D.E.R.).
,ANALYSIS
The artificial wetland has been selected by the staff for the following
reasons:
a. Lower in initial capital cost in design and construction.
b. Less manpower requirements.
c. It is less complicated to maintain.
d. It is less costly to maintain.
e. It is environmentally sound for the area. Florida Department
of Environmental Regulation and SJRWMD are in favor of the
concept.
The estimated total assessment cost at this time is as follows:
1. Present estimated construction cost
(this includes package plant relocation)
15% contingency
. Estimated administrative costs are:
Postage, copies and permitting cost
b) Additional services in survey and subsurface
investigation service fee. This includes
services on alternate site, additional
acreage and mitigation area, and
lift station site
3. Land acquisition; includes 40 acres of site with
wetland area and 9 acres of mitigation area
Engineering (original authorization).
This includes design using the existing package
plant, permitting services, topography,
boundary surveys and legal description of
first site only, construction phase services,
bidding services and inspection services.
Additional engineering services proposed with
upper limit are (WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 2):
.This includes modification in design using
artificial wetland for effluent disposal system,
MSSW permit and its requirements
Total estimated project cost
County assessment
Total estimated assessment cost to
benefitting property owners
RECOMMENDATION
$445,000.00
.$ 67,000.00.
$ 9,500.00
$ 5,500.00
$ 20,000.00
$622,600.00
($150,000.00)
$472,600.00
Looking at the complexity and sensitivity of the environment of this
project, the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board
of County Commissioners approve the continuation of this project with
the following:
1. Purchase of the 20 -acre site and donation of 29 acres to support
the artificial wetlands disposal system and authorize the Chairman
of the Board of County Commissioners to execute the purchase
contract.
2. Work Authorization No. 2, with Professional Engineering
Consultants, Inc., which includes modification of the design to
utilize artificial wetland for effluent disposal, preparation of
MSSW permit and its requirements.
These costs
project.
AUG (3 1I
shall be a part of the total assessment cost pg the
55
BOOK 83 P„60( d
'AUG 6 199i
i
BOOK 83 F'AGF, 8
Director Pinto noted that this project, which has been
around for a long time, is somewhat complicated. The original
report done by Post Buckley called for spray irrigation in an
area we had presumed we were going to lease, but when we came up
to where we get permits issued, the Water Management District now
says we have another problem because the area we are talking
about for the spray irrigation was artifically dewatered by the
rancher, and if he stops dewatering, this area becomes a wetland.
To get around all the problems, we have been negotiating an
actual purchase agreement with Mr. Holman to take the entire area
we are talking about for effluent disposal and change that from
spray irrigation to wetlands because if the pumping is stopped,
it will become wetlands anyway.
Director Pinto advised that another benefit that we haven't
confirmed yet is that in the Landfill we have found there is an
acre of wetlands which the Water Management District is telling
us we are going to have to mitigate, and it is possible that we
may be able to utilize some of the subject property for that
purpose.
Commissioner Bowman asked if this will require any diking,
and Director Pinto advised that the diking is already there but
we may put a dike across one area.
Commissioner Scurlock had two questions. One related to our
P&Z requirements which he felt are not correct in that he did not
feel that we should be told to assign density to 20 acres where
we locate a wastewater plant. He felt that should be adjusted,
and Administrator Chandler confirmed that staff is going to be
bringing back a recommended change in the plan.
Commissioner Scurlock advised that the other question, which
he feels is important, relates to the fact that the number one
selected firm for this particular project was not selected
because we could not negotiate a price, and we then hired number
two because we were successful in negotiating a price with them.
He, therefore, just wanted to make sure it is on the record that
the original firm indicated they couldn't do it because there
were going to be environmentally serious problems in permitting,
and they had to walk away from the contract, and now we are
sitting here with another contract and adding to it. Circum-
stances may have changed, but that original firm indicated they
couldn't do it for what we said, and now we are back asking for
$10,000 more. Commissioner Scurlock asked what the original
price was.
Director Pinto advised that he went back and looked at that,
and the original was $83,100.
56
Commissioner Scurlock wished it confirmed and on the record
that we are still under that. He thought this is important
because when you don't go with #1 and then go with #2 and then
add costs later, the question always will come up, would that
have been equal. But he is hearing now that this total contract
price is still Tess than the original negotiations with the #1
firm.
Director Pinto stated yes.
Commissioner Bowman asked if she understood that this
wetland when established will be open to public use.
Director Pinto noted that it would be owned by the county,
but there will be some restriction because it will be an effluent
disposal area, and actually it isn't very accessible.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized
the Chairman to execute contracts to purchase the 20 -
acre site and accept donation of the 29 acres to
support the artificial wetlands disposal system and
approved Work Authorization No. 2 with Professional
Engineering Consultants, Inc., as recommended by staff.
57
AUG
BOOK 8;,j FA40 ;9
AUG 6 1991
ENGINEERING WORK AUTHORIZATION
Date: 7- t - eit Work Authorization No. 2 For Consulting Services
Project No. US-90-01-DC/CS/ED County I.D.: PEC, Inc. (Consultant)
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
II.
Ei00K
J) PAG,
t)
Additional consulting engineering services related to construction of the Blue Cypress Lake
Community Sewage Improvement Project..
Estimate for the Project, including 15% contingency is:
$512,000.00 (Construction)
$622.600.00 (Total Project)
SCOPE OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND LUMP SUM FEE FOR ADDMONAI,
SERVICES
A. Site visit to meet with FDER, who will be determining the Limits of the existing
jurisdictional wetlands on the proposed site.
B. Field survey to delineate jurisdictional wetland as identified by FDER (coordination and
subconsultant services).
C. Preparation of Legal Description and sketch for proposed site (coordination and
subconsultant services)
D. Revise Construction Drawings and Specifications to reflect proposed artificial wetland
effluent,disposal system.
E. Prepare FDER "Management and Storage of Surface Water Permit" (MSSW) Applica-
tion, and associated meetings and coordination with FDER.
F. Compensation for Additional Services. This authorization shall include a cost element
number two (#2). (See attached breakdown for manhours and associated costs in
accordance with Master Agreement).
Cost element shall not exceed $10,000.00
Payment for cost element two may be for actual hours and actual sub -consultant fees on
a monthly basis. The County Shall make payment within 45 days of receipt of invoice.
COST ELEMENT #2 $10.000.00
SUBMITTED BY:
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS, INC.
BY:
David R. Refling, P.E.
Title: Principal
Date: g — 7'— R
APPROVED BY:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
BY:
Indian River Co.
Aporoved
Date
Admin
7fl+'
s_.�3lla 9:
/
Legal
.e -A
a
1' - t
Budget
(1C -i.)
Utllitipc —T
,
/
._*R-13-11-fj . 9/
Rich Mgr.
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
CONTRACTS w/H.R.HOLMAN FOR 20 ACRE SITE & 29 ACRE SITE ARE ON
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD.
58
PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Chairman Bird reviewed the following, noting that the lease
extension agreement will be brought back at a subsequent meeting:
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
SUMMARY
August 1, 1991
1) The committee recommended approval of the lease extension on
the 16th Street ballfield complex.
2) There is a problem with speeding vehicles on the inner road
at Gifford Park. It was recommended that the road be
• temporarily closed until Rex Hailey and Jim Davis can come
back to the committee with a more permanent recommendation.
RESOLUTION CREATING EMERGENCY SERVICES DIST. ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Commissioner Eggert explained that the proposed Resolution
essentially takes the present Fire District Advisory Boards,
dissolves them, and puts our Ad Hoc Committee, minus Indian River
Shores, as the new combined district. This was approved by the
Ad Hoc Fire Committee. She believed that in the future we
probably will see this committee become smaller, but right now
everyone involved in the planning would like to carry on to see
that the consolidation goes according to the plan.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com-
missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 91-93 creating an Indian River County
Emergency Services District Advisory Committee.
AUG 61991
59
BOOK. 83 PA6/03
BOOK 83 F41
RESOLUTION 91-93
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CREATING AN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT ADVISORY
COMMITTEE.
WHEREAS, the electors of Indian River County approved, by
referendum at the March 12, 1991 election, the consolidation of the
North, West, and South County Fire Districts and the Emergency
Medical Services Division into a new Emergency Services District,
embracing the entire County except Indian River Shores; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has determined that it would be advisable to create an ad-
visory committee to make recommendations to the Board of County
Commissioners concerning said District,
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
1. There is hereby created an Emergency Services District Advisory
Committee to be composed of 14* members with membership and
the initial terms of office in years as follows:
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert, Indian River County (4)
Chairman
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr., Indian River County (4)
Mayor Jay Smith, City of Vero Beach (4)
Council Representative, City of Vero Beach (2)
Lee Carter, Fellsmere (2)
Lonnie ,Powell, Sebastian (4)
Ernie Polverari, Town of Orchid (2)
Arthur J. Harris, Wabasso and Gifford (2)
Richard Carter, Vero Beach Vol. Fire Department (2)
Patricia E. Johnson, North County Vol. Fire Department (2)
Jim Judge, Chief Paramedic (4)
Wilbur Tripp, South County Fire Fighters, Paid (4)
Mike Grice, North County Fire Fighters, Paid (2)
Byron T. Cooksey, Esq., Member at Large (4)
* Ex officio members: Joe Dorsky, Town of Indian River
Shores and County Staff
2. The committee shall meet during the month of June and January
or at the call of its chairman and shall be advisory only.
3. All advisory committees previously established for emergency
services and the various fire districts are hereby abolished.
4. The provisions of Title 1, Chapter 101 of the Code of Ordinances
of Indian River County shall apply to this advisory committee
60
except regular terms of office shall be 4 years.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Wheeler and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Bowman , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye
Aye
Ayp
Aye
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 6 day of' August , 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Jeffre$arton Richard N. Bird
Clerk laser. s� .� - C-. Chairman
RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONY FOR NEW COUNTY HEALTH BUILDING & HRS
PUBLIC MEETING ON GEOGRAPHICAL RESTRUCTING OF DISTRICT
Commissioner Eggert informed the Board that there will be a
ribbon cutting ceremony celebrating the opening of the new County
Health Building on Wednesday, August 14th, at 3:00 P.M.
Commissioner Eggert further advised that the DHRS has been
going through a plan District by District for restructuring to a
more local operation. On the next two Thursday nights, we are
going to continue to have public hearings. The next time the
geographical district and the possible splitting off of Palm
Beach will be discussed, and the third meeting is on what
authority this group would have. Commissioner Eggert felt this
affects the counties and every taxpayer quite a bit and advised
that the meetings will be held at the Student Union of the Indian
River Community College at 7:00 P.M.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment,
the Board would reconvene sitting as the District Board of
Commissioners of the Solid Waste Disposal District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
61
AUG ,6 1991
BOOK 83 Pg.103
61U6 6 1991
BOOK 83 FA4O34
There being no further business, on Motion duly made,
seconded and carried, the. Board adjourned at 10:10 o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
Clerk Chairman
62