The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9/11/1991BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA SEPTEMBER 11, 1991 5:01 P.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1840 25th STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA County Commissioners Richard N. Bird, Chairman Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Carolyn K. Eggert Don C. Scurlock, Jr. James E. Chandler, Administrator Joseph A. Baird, OMB Director Charles Vitunac, County Attorney Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 5:01 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge Of Allegiance - Richard N. Bird, Chairman 3. Adoption of Procedure to conduct Hearings on Ad Valorem Taxing Districts Recommend adoption of following procedures for each fund in agenda item 4: "A. Open Hearing B. Announce % increase in Millage over Rolled Back Rate necessary to fund the Budget, if any, and Specific Purposes for which Ad Valorem Tax Revenues are being increased C. Receive comments from the Public D. Consider any Proposed Amendments to Tentative Budget and Calculate Revised Millage Rate (if revised) E. Adopt Millage Rate Resolution F. Adopt Budget Resolutiuon G. Announce %, if any, by which Recomputed Tentative Millage Rate Exceeds the Rolled Back Rate" SEP 111991 BOOK SEP 11 1991 v BOOK 84 PAGE► 4. AD VALOREM FUNDS Discuss Aggregate Millage a. General Fund b. Transportation Fund c. General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit d. Library Bonds e. South County Fire District f. North County Fire District g. West County Fire District 5. Adoption of Procedure to conduct Hearings on Non -Ad Valorem Assessment Districts. Recommend adoption of following procedures for each fund in agenda item 6: A. Announce 1991/92 proposed charge and total budget for each Non -Ad Valorem Assessment District B. Receive comments from the Public C. Consider any Proposed Amendments to Budget and Calculate Revised Charge D. Resolution adopting the 1991/92 Charge E. Adopt Budget Resolution" 6. NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS a. Vero Lake Estates M.S.T.U. b. Solid Waste Disposal District c. Gifford Street Lighting District d. Laurelwood Street Lighting District e. Rockridge Street Lighting District f. Vero Highlands Street Lighting District g Porpoise Point Street Lighting District h. Single Light Districts 6. NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS - CONTINUED i. Laurel Court Street Lighting District j Tierra Linda Street Lighting District k. Vero Shores Street Lighting District 1. Ixora Park Street Lighting District m. Royal Poinciana Street Lighting District n Roseland Road Street Lighting District 7. Adoption of Procedures to conduct Hearings of Enterprise and Internal Service Funds, Other Debt Funds, Special Revenue Funds and Capital Projects Recommend that the following procedures be adopted for use with the funds in agenda items 8, 9, 10 and 11: "A. Announce total dollar budget of each fund. B. Receive comments from the Public C. Consider any Proposed Amendment to Budget D. Adopt Budget Resolution" 8. ENTERPRISE AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: a. Golf Course b. Building Department c. Water and Sewer Utilities d. Utilities Impact Fee e. Fleet Management f. Self Insurance Trust Fund 9. OTHER DEBT FUNDS a. 1985 Ref. & Improvement bonds b. Route 60 Sewer Assessment Bond c. Route 60 Water Assessment Bond d. Rockridge Special Assessment Bond e. North County Sewer Assessment Bond RCOK. j F'A{E L40 r. SEP 11 1991 S EP f1 10. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS • BOOK 84 PACE 24S a. Road Impact Fees b. Police Academy Trust Fund c. Court Facilities Fund d. Housing Authority Fund e. Section .8 Rental Assistance f. Secondary Road Construction Trust Fund g. Special Law Enforcement Fund h. Parks Development i. Tree Ordinance Fine Fund j. Tourist Tax Fund k. 911 Surcharge 1. Drug Abuse Fund m. Local Government Criminal Justice Fund n. Petition Paving 11. CAPITAL PROJECTS a. Gifford Road Improvements b. Indian River Boulevard North c. Treasure Shores Park d. Discretionary Sales Surtax e. New Library Construction 12. ADJOURN IF ANY PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE ON THE ABOVE MATTERS, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSES, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY IN EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE APPEAL WED. . Wednesday, September 11, 1991 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Special Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Wednesday, September 11, 1991, at 5:01 o'clock P.M. Present were Richard N. Bird, Chairman; Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman; Margaret C. Bowman; Carolyn K. Eggert; and Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, Attorney to the Board of County Commissioners; Joseph Baird, OMB Director; and Virginia Hargreaves, Deputy Clerk. The Chairman called the meeting to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Chairman Bird announced that this is our final hearing on the budget for this coming fiscal year and asked Administrator Chandler to go over the procedure to be followed and give a briefing on the proposed budget. After reviewing the procedure to be followed whereby a hearing would be opened and closed on each fund and the public allowed to speak in regard to whichever fund they were interested in, Administrator Chandler informed those present that this is the second and final hearing to receive input on the proposed budget for fiscal year 91/92. He announced that the total proposed budget is $133,909,981 and that contains an expense increase of 2.82%. Of those budgets of which ad valorem fund is a part, the aggregate millage proposed is 6.8996, and that reflects an increase of 1.360 over rollback. The Administrator continued that as we get into each of these budgets, you will find that the General Fund is below rollback, the MSTU budget is below rollback, and the South, North and West Fire Districts are above rollback. In all 3 Districts, their expenses are consis- tent with what was presented to the public and approved at the March referendum. &)OK SEP 11 1991 SEP 11Agi ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS BOOK 84 f rE 251 Chairman Bird announced that before opening the public hearings on each fund, he has some requests for additions to the Agenda. OMB Director Baird has indicated that he needs to have Resolutions added relating to Golf Course rates and Utility base facility charge rates, and County Attorney Vitunac needs direc- tion regarding his attendance at a hearing relating to train whistles. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously added the above described items to the Agenda. The Chairman inquired about the legal notice of this meeting, and Attorney Vitunac informed him that we have the actual publication, and the proof will be forthcoming in the mail. Said Notice is as follows: NOTICE OF TAX INCREASE The Board of County Commissioners cif Indian River County has tentatively adopted a measure to increase its properly tax levy by 1.36%. All concerned citizens are invited to attend a public hearing on the tax increase to be held Wednesday, September 11, 1991, at 5:01 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers at 1840. 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. A FINAL DECISION on the proposed tax increase and the budget will be made at this time. 2 Press-Joumal, Monday, September 9,1991,13A 1991-92 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BUDGET SUMMARY . THE PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET EXPENDITURES OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ARE 2.82% MORE THAN LAST YEAR'S TOTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following Is a statement summarizing last year's budget tentatively adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, for FY 91-92 showing each budget and the total of all the budgets, the proposed tax millages, the balances, the reserve and the total of each major classification of receipts and expenditures. AD VALOREM TAXING AUTHORITIES GENERAL PURPOSE CUNTY• TRANSPOR- MUNICIPAL FIRE ONORTH COUNTY COWEST UNTY GENERAL TATION SERVICE LIBRARYFUFIRE • State ESTIMASTED ources RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: FUND TSG UNIT BONDS DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT TOTAL Local Sources • 2,348,552 514,675 2,358 298 0 Ad Valorem Taxes • 4 019,990 .200,000 3,571,050 22,500 384,117 157,030 0 5221,525 Sub -Total 23,325,690 0 4,245,119 1,648.85211,000 8,365,687 29,894,232 714,875 10,174,467 1,671,352 8 3261,0914 1,077,614920 239,315 • 36,316,457 Less 5% per F.S. 129.01(2)(b) (1,484,711) (35,734) (83,568) (316,051) (53,880) (12,515)250,315 (2,495,183)49,903,869 28,209,521 678,941 6,724) ' Transfers Net / 5,748,081 6,488,947 9,665,743 1,587,784 •0 6,004,963 1,023,734 237,800 47,408,486 Cash Forward -October 1, 1991 6,626,795 1.343.128 2,750,000 138,0880 0 0 12,237,008 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES 40,584,377 8,511,016 12,415,743 1,725852 604,400 _404.971 10.000 11.877.362 APPROPRIATIONS , 8,609363 1,428,705 247,800 71,522,856 General Government 9,121,199 283,456 852,818 • Public Safety 19,468,549 0 218,136 1,639,850 ' 11,897,325 Physical Environment 206,2635,938,481 1,123,843 • 206,50 26,955,509 Transportation 0 50,838 0 0 Economic Environment 0 7,144,602 230,131 0 0 257,101 Human Services 143,852 0 0 0 7,374,733 Culture/Recreation 1,762,667 0 0 0 143,852 2,793,875 0 809,987 0' 0 1,762,667 Interfund Transfers 3.541.457 0 9.082.977 0 • 0 3,603,862 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 37,037,862 7,428,058 11,244,8870 0 12.624.434 Reserve for Contingencies 1,446,515 207,958 1,639,85 5,938,481 1,123,843 , 206,500 64.619,483 Cash Forward -September 30, 1992 2.100.000 875 000 396,460 420,482 74,862 0 2,546,277 TOTAL BUDGET 774.398 • 86,000 _ 250.400 _ 230.000 40,584,377 8,511,01 12,415,743 1,725,85241,300 4.357.096 Proposed Millage 6.609,363 1,428,705 247,800 71,522,856 4.6423 MILLS 1.5093 MILLS .3282 MILLS 1.7996 MILLS 1.3500 MILLS .7791 MILLS Rollback Millage 4.8054 MILLS 1.5121 MILLS NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS .919095 MILLS • MILLS • .2304 MILLS VERO LAKES ESTATES ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: •TAXING UNIT SOLID WASTE CIPAL SERVICE Federal Sources DISPOSAL DISTRICT State Sources 0 Local Sources 0 0 Non -Ad Valorem Assessments 5,000 200,000 • Sub -Total 199,000 1,819,000 Less 5% per F.S. 129.01(2)(b) 204,000 4,186,230 •Net (10,200) 6,005,230 Transfers 193,800 (300,262) Cash Forward-Oct.ober1, 1991 0 5,704,968 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES 193,800 •2,014,339 APPROPRIATIONS:7,719,307 General Government - Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation Economic Environment + 183,06 •6396,17 Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfund Transfers TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies 183,06 Cash Forward -September 30, 1992 10,740 TOTAL BUDGET - 0 193,800 1991/92 PROPOSED CHARGE: $50.00 PER/PARCEL -- - ACRE f 6,396,17 74,36 128307 $35.32 PER WASTE GENERATION UNIT ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: Non -Ad Valorem Assessment Local Sources Contributions Less 5% per F.S. 129.01(2)(b) Sub -Total Cash Forward -October 1, 1991 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES GIFFORD STREET LIGHT- ING DISTRICT 57,015 300 0 (2,866) 54,449 54,4-49 APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES: Utilities Administration/Collection Advertising Maintenance • TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward -September 30. 1992 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES 48.900 2,759 100 0 51,759 0 2190 -549 Proposed Per Parcel/Acre Charge $17.50 REVENUES:. User Fees Interest Income Less 5% per F.S. 129.01(2)(b) Cash Forward -October 1, 1991 TOTAL REVENUES EXPENSES: Golf Course Maintenance Vehicle Maintenance Water/Sewer Combination Services Self Insurance • Protective Services Transfers Reserves Cash Forward -September 30, 1992 TOTAL EXPENSES NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS VERO PORPOISE LAUREL TIERRA LAURELWOOD ROCKRIDGE HIGHLANDS POINT COURT LINDA STREET STREET STREET STREET SINGLE STREET STREET LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHT LIGHTING LIGHTING DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT ' DISTRICT DISTRICT 5,808 1,935 40.100 1.320 0 1.030 4,780 944 595 2,820 160 0 28 100 0 . ( 0 0- 0 3.790 0 0 6,414 2,403 40.774 1,408 3,600 1(005 4,636 4.428 2,000 23.182 370 1,754 0 0 10,832 -4;403 7137958. -T,•778 5,354 -1..005 4838. 5,500 733 100 0 GOLF COURSE 1,533,180 22,000 (77,759) 332.849 1,810,270 1,773,44 36,82 1,810,27 ESTIMATED RE1; u'm AND BALANCES Federal Sources • State Sources Local Sources . Less 5% per F.S. 129.01(2)(b) Transfers Cash Forward -October 1,1991 • • TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS'AND BALANCES APPROPRIATIONS: General Government Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation • Economic Environment Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfund Transfers TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward -September 30, 1992 TOTAL BUDGET 6.333 600 . 3.909 2 2,000 445 100 200 2,14b 300 1.358 4,403 $22.00 $5.00 52,778 3,228 100 0 56,108 2,000 5.850 X958 612 5.254 354 100 0 1,066 125 739 100' 154 0 12 0 0 5,354 0 585 • 0 1,778 5,354 905 100 • * 0 1.u05 $25.00 $30.00 N/A $33.00 ENTERPRISE AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS BUILDING WATER & SEWER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT UTILITIES IMPACT FEE 450,500' 85.000 (26,775) 701.769 1,'210,494 0 0 0 0 9,425,610 340,000 (488,280) 421.810 8,b99,140 • 9,451,47 979,692 0 30,802 152.66 200.000 95.00 1,210,494 9,699,14 OTHER FUNDS SPECIAL REVENUE • 955.542 1,048,326 6,176,333 (409,009) 424,852 5,859,406 13.855,450 304,003 98,000 0 9,545,465 90,504 1,195,395 • 352,350 117,426 11.793,143 797.821 1354.488 13.855.450 5,682,667 0 (284,134) 0 5,s96,Ssf 5,398,533 5,398,533 1,650 1,900 • 60 0' -57014 610 300 443 726 827 X636 6,314 N/A $26.00 VERO SHORES STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT. 5,616 440 0 (303) 5,753 561 6,314 4,311 633 100 0 FLEET MANAGEMENT ' 1,157,790 0 0 0 1,157,790 0 1,137,132 0• 0 0 0 20,658 1,157,790 1XORA PARK STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 6,348 396 0 (337) 6,407 2,178 "-8;583' 6,825 648 • 100 0 0 7,573 11.851 158 100 852 2.853 X583 14.804 523.00 531.00 SELF INSURANCE TRUST FUND 1,146.139 45.996 (59,806) 0 1,132,b21i ROYAL POINCIANA STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 11,873 552 0 (621) 11,804 3.000 14,804 10.770 981 100 0 0 0 1,129,059 • 0 0 3,470 _ 0 -1,132,529 CAPITAL .PROJECTS 0 1,000,000 5,717,534 (335,877) 80,000 10,121,023 16,582,680 1,483,500 0 ' 0• 9,950,000 0 0 675,355 0 12,106,655 2,473,825 2,000,000' 16,582,680 1 ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT 3,828 0 0 (192) 3.636 0 -3,636 2.375 343 25 0 2,743 100 793 ---3,638 $6.00 1 ESTIMATED REU u -rr AND BALANCES: Federal Sources State Sources Local Sources Less 5% per F.S. 129.01(2)(b) Transfers Cash Forward—October 1, 1991 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES APPROPRIATIONS: General Government Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation Economic Environment Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfund Transfers TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward—September 30,1992 TOTAL BUDGET 1985 REF. & IMPROV. BONDS 0 1,398,890 80.000 (73,945) 0 33.660 10.000 378,036 OTHER DEBT FUNDS ROUTE 60 • SEWER ASSESSMENT . BOND. • 0 0 387,406 (19,370) 0 1,438,605 . 1,438,60 1,438,80 378,03 378,03 ROUTE 60 WATER ASSESSMENT BOND 0 0 60,000 (3.000) 0 23,000 80,000 1,438,60 378,03 80.00 60,00 1,388,53 The fine, budget hearingFINAL BUDGET HEARING FOR FY 1991-92 g on the 1991-92 Indian River County Budget will be held on Wednesday, September 11, 1991, at 5:01 p.m. In the County Commission Chambers at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. All citizens are en- couraged to present written and oral comments and ask questions regarding the entire budget. Copies of the Proposed Budget are available Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. in the Office of Management and Bud- get, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. R SOC$PRIDGE ASSESSMENT BOND 0 0 128,626 (8,431) 0 40.000 162,195 122,19 122,19 40,00 162,19 NORTH G I Y• SEWER • ASSESSMENT BOND 1,0:•:,53 300,00 1,388,53 1,088,538 1,088,53 300.00 1 1 SEP 1i 1991 GENERAL FUND {" l r BOOK 84 F'A,;E ``e.b5 Chairman Bird asked that Administrator Chandler first address the General Fund. Administrator Chandler informed those present that the proposed millage for the General Fund is 4.6423, and that is 3.40% below the rollback rate. The proposed budget of $40,584,377 contains an expense increase of 2.42% which is primarily associated with additional positions for two new parks, the EMS Equalization Plan, Health Insurance, salary contingen- cies, and the annualized cost for the new Phase III of the Jail which will be going into operation. Chairman Bird opened the public hearing on the General Fund and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Fred Mensing, resident of Roseland, expressed his opinion that everyone is looking to get re-elected, and the County is simply playing games with numbers to show the taxpayers that they are holding the line in millage. He felt it is time that the Commission took the axe to some of the expenses and told staff they are going to have to work within these constraints. He pointed out that we are in a recession; we have got very high unemployment in this region; and he, therefore, felt the Board as elected officials should hold an absolute line, not a millage line, which is a lot of financial double talk. Mr. Mensing stressed that if you increase his assessment by 12%, you haven't held anything and continued to contend that the County is increasing taxes with their rollback millage. He did agree that the public did vote on the Fire Districts and bonds for the Libraries, but they didn't vote on rollback millage or this budget. Mr. Mensing stated that a meeting at 5:00 in the afternoon is a meeting no working person can attend, and he believed that we will be looking at new faces on the Commission if we are looking at higher dollar taxes. John Welton, Winter Beach resident, just wished to say "ditto." Stanley Brewer, 461 Avocado Ave., Sebastian, informed the Board that his property valuation went up 40% and his total taxes went up 30%, and he is sick of it. John Boudrot, county resident, came before the Board with his baby son, John Paul. He felt it is appropriate to have his son present because he wished to point out that every penny more he has to pay out in taxes is one less that he can spend on his family. He asked that the Board please find some way, particu- larly in these difficult economic times, to control taxes. Erica Babcock, Vero Highlands, wished to add her "ditto." 6 James Hensley, 1856 79th Avenue, advised that his complaint is of a different type and has to do with the quality of life in Indian River County. He has lived here part of the year for about 8 years and now is a permanent resident. He certainly never anticipated that he would be using a homemade outhouse 20 or 30 times during the summer months because of heavy rains and sewage backup. Mr. Hensley stressed that he is not against taxes, but did feel that we should get something for them. It is his understanding that the County is obligated to clean out these ditches, but he has not seen much of that in the time he has been living here. Norma Cox, 6308 South River Run Drive, Sebastian, informed the Board that she has lived here almost 4 years. She was granted Homestead Exemption, but now her taxes in this county in this coming year will be the same as when she was an out-of-state resident. The services she receives remain the same, however, and she feels that is a problem. Leonard Schaefer, 405 29th Street, new county resident, advised he is having a hard time with the Property Appraiser. He claimed that he has found there are some extremely high priced properties that are very underassessed, and he believed if everything were assessed properly, we would not be here complain- ing about paying such high taxes. He felt that we should take a serious look to make sure everyone is assessed fairly. Chairman Bird explained that assessment falls under the purview of the Property Appraiser, who is a separate elected official. It is the responsibility of the Property Appraiser to make a fair assessment, and once that is done, the County Commission applies a millage against that assessment. There are, however, many other taxing bodies in the County that also levy a millage to make up your total tax bill. Chairman Bird really felt that in most cases the increased amount of taxes probably are due to an increase in the valuation on your property and that even though there are some reflections of a downturn in the real estate market, they are not to a large enough degree that the Property Appraiser can take them into account in a mass lowering of property values in this county. He assured those present that we will try to hold the line on millage as best we can, but again pointed out that it is the combination of all the taxing entities that makes up your tax bill. Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that the School Board, for one, is a major part of your taxes. The Hospital District, the various drainage districts, and fire districts, are all a part, but the School Board has had an especially large impact. 7 SEP 11199 i s r BOOK SEP 1 1 BOOK . 04 PAGE, U 1 Mr. Schaefer asked if it wouldn't affect the County's revenues if properties are not being assessed high enough, and Chairman Bird agreed that is true. but stressed that is the responsibility of the Property Appraiser. Commissioner Wheeler further explained that the Board has no authority over the Property Appraiser or how he does his job only the Governor does and the voters. Mr. Stanley Brewer complained that 5:01 P.M. is a very inappropriate time to have a Budget hearing; that it doesn't allow those who work for a living time to eat and attend the hearing. County Attorney Vitunac pointed out to Mr. Brewer that the Statutes require the meetings begin after 5:00 P.M., but these meetings can and have gone on 4 or 5 hours on occasion. It is a convenient time for most people, and they can eat a little early or a little late. The Board doesn't get to eat dinner either, and we don't want to keep people here until midnight. Chairman Bird believed that historically we have had these budget hearings at 5:01 P.M. for the last 10 or 11 years, and Commissioner Scurlock noted that last week the Budget hearing went on until 9:30 P.M. The Chairman determined that no one else wished to be heard and thereupon closed the hearing on the General Fund. Attorney Vitunac informed those present that the law requires that we have the first millage resolution and first budget resolution read aloud in their entirety. These resolu- tions are practically identical except for the millage rates and budget amounts; so, after the first are read aloud, the resolu- tions will be referred to only by their title and the millage and budget amounts announced unless someone from the audience requests that they be read in entirety. Liz Forlani, Administrative Assistant to the Board, read aloud in its entirety the proposed Millage Resolution for the General Fund, which establishes a tax millage rate for the General Fund for fiscal year 1991/92 of 4.6423 mills. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-105 establishing a tax millage rate for the General Fund of 4.6423 mills for fiscal year 1991/92. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 105 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE TAX MILLAGE RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE GENERAL FUND. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the General Fund of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and WHEREAS, the proposed millage rate for the General Fund does not exceed rolled back rate; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith levy upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for fiscal year 1991-92 a tax of 4.6423 mills on the dollar for the purpose of funding the General Fund of Indian River County; 9 SEP 111991 -� BOOK c)� s,.� ;�7�,., SEP 11 99 BOOK 84 FA6E:69 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the millage as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner S c u r 1 o c k, and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Ay e Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Ay e Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Ay e The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA � 11111111171/1, A,ttest; JeffrreyK."Barton, Clerk By Richard N. Bird Chairman Liz Forlani, Administrative Assistant to the Board, next read aloud in its entirety the proposed Budget Resolution for the General Fund, which establishes a Budget for the General Fund in the amount of $40,584,377 for fiscal year 1991/92. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-106 approving a budget for the General Fund in the amount of $40,584,377 for fiscal year 1991/92. 10 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 106 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE GENERAL FUND. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, . FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the General Fund are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the General Fund. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Scurlock , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September est: Itrn,Clerk ,� a • Attachment: EXHIBIT 'A' SEP 11 1991 , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By 11 Richard N. Bird Chairman f4C BOOK '.GE, • ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: State Sources Local Sources Ad Valorem Taxes Sub -Total Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) Net Transfers Cash Forward -October 1, 1991 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES APPROPRIATIONS: General Government Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation Economic Environment Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfund Transfers TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward -September 30,1992 TOTAL BUDGET Proposed Millage Rollback Millage D:U23R31AD9192\PAGE1 REVISED: 09-06-91 AD VALOREM TAXING AUTHORITIES GENERAL FUND TRANSPOR- TATION FUND 2,348,552 514,675 4,019,990 200,000 23,325,690 0 29,694,232 • 714,675 (1,484,711) (35,734) 28,209,521 678,941 5,748,061 6,488,947 6,626,795 1,343,128 40,584,377 8,511,016 9,121,199 283,456 19,468,549 0 206,263 0 0 7,144,602 143,852 0 1,762,667 0 2,793,875 0 3,541,457 0 37,037,862 7,428,058 1,446,515 207,958 2,100,000 875,000 40,584,377 8,511,016 4.6423 MILLS 4.8054 MILLS GENERAL PURPOSE MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT 2,358,298 3,571,050 4,245,119 10,174,467 (508,724) 9,665,743 0 2,750,000 12,415,743 852,818 218,136 50,838 230,131 0 0 809,987 9,082,977 11,244,887 396,460 774,396 12,415,743 1.5093 MILLS 1.5121 MILLS SOUTH NORTH COUNTY COUNTY LIBRARY FIRE FIRE BONDS DISTRICT DISTRICT 0 0 0 22,500 384,117 157,030 1,648,852 5,936,897 920,584 1,671,352 6,321,014 1,077,614 (83,568) (316,051) (53,880) 1,587,784 6,004,963 1,023,734 0 0 0 138,068 604,400 404,971 1,725,852 6,609,363 1,428,705 1,639,852 0 0 0 5,938,481 1,123,843 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,639,852 5,938,481 1,123,843 0 420,482 74,862 86,000 250,400 230,000 1,725,852 6,609,363 1,428,705 WEST COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT TOTAL 0 5,221,525 11,000 8,365,687 239,315 36,316,457 250,315 49,903,669 (12,515) (2,495,183) 237,800 47,408,486 0 12,237,008 10,000 11,877,362 247,800 71,522,856 0 206,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 206,500 0 41,300 247,800 .3282 MILLS 1.7996 MILLS 1.3500 MILLS .7791 MILLS N/A 1.5495 MILLS .9190 MILLS .2304 MILLS 11,897,325 26,955,509 257,101 7,374,733 143,852 1,762,667 3,603,862 12,624,434 64,619,483 2,546,277 4,357,096 71,522,856 TRANSPORTATION FUND Administrator Chandler informed those present that the Transportation Fund is comprised of the Road & Bridge, Public Works, Engineering, and Traffic Engineering Departments, and while there is no millage rate directly involved with its funding, a portion of this is funded with taxes from both the General Fund and the MSTU. The total proposed budget is $8,511,016, an expense increase of 3.08%. The major part of this increase is due to continuing bridge replacement, equipment replacement, some new positions, salary contingencies and the increased cost of Health Insurance. The Chairman opened the public hearing on the Transportation Fund and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Mr. Brewer wished more information about the health coverage increase, and Administrator Chandler explained that this is the Health Insurance for employees, and that is a total increase of 22% in next year's budget. Originally the increase was projected to be in the range of 40%; we then hired an outside expert to look at our plan and recommend changes; and it was rebid. In terms of our total budget, the total increase on health insurance is in the magnitude of approximately one million dollars. Commissioner Scurlock further noted that it is that much more even with reduced coverage, and Administrator Chandler explained some of the changes in the coverage as well as the use of the PPO (Preferred Provider Organization). He noted that the elements affecting that increase are the same as with everyone else in the general public - the hospital charges, doctors' charges, tests, etc. He continued to stress that we were looking at a 40% increase but have managed to get that down to 22%, and the consultant has indicated that with the plan that has been adopted, we could expect some increase in the year after this, but not nearly as high as this year or in prior years. Mr. Brewer wished to know how many bids the county received. Administrator Chandler advised there were about seven, and once those bids were received. we then negotiated the PPOs where as a result there is a better rate provided to the County at Indian River Memorial Hospital and Doctors' Clinic. The Chairman determined that no one else wished to be heard and closed the hearing on the Transportation Fund. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- missioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-107 approving a budget for the Transportation Fund in the amount of $8,511,016 for fiscal year 1991/92. 13 SEP 11.1 1991 • BOOK -'U471)a SEP 11 x`99 BOCK FADE;; RESOLUTION NO. 91- 107 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE TRANSPORTATION FUND. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the Transportation Fund are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attaced budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the Transporation Fund. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Scurlock , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of Septemher K. arton, Clerk C Attachment: EXHIBIT 'A' , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By 14 Richard N. Bird Chairman GENERAL PURPOSE MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT (GPMSTU) Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed millage for the GPMSTU is 1.5093, and that is a decrease of .19% below rollback. The total proposed budget is $12,415,743, and that contains an expense increase of .28% or less than 1% - in dollars it amounts to a $34,000 increase on a 12 million dollar budget. The increase is related primarily to the new parks, additional City of Vero Beach recreation funding, health insurance costs, and salary contingencies. Chairman Bird felt it would be enlightening if it were explained that everyone in the county pays the millage in the General Fund, but the MSTU is paid only by those in the unincorporated area. If you live in one of the municipalities, you do not pay this. Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that if you live in a city, you will have city millage in place of the MSTU, and Chairman Bird noted that the city's tax is another factor over which we have no control. The Chairman opened the public hearing on the GPMSTU and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-108 establishing a tax millage rate for the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit of 1.5093 mills for fiscal year 1991/92. 15 SEP 1 1 1991 BOOK 84 f'Y.;[ E3 SEP 11 199 BOOKi FAL RESOLUTION NO. 91- 108 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE TAX MILLAGE RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY GENERAL PURPOSE MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Office of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxesto be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and WHEREAS, the proposed millage rate for the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit does not exceed rolled back rate; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith levy upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for fiscal year 1991-92 a tax of 1.5093 mills on the dollar for the purpose of funding the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County; 16 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the millage as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurl ock , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Wheel er , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA 01111.'1+ Jeff`i r� carton, Clerk .e.- v. rsGJtgutO , SEP 1i 1991 By Richard N. Bird Chairman ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-109 approving a budget for the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit in the amount of $12,415,743 for fiscal year 1991/92. 17 BOOK 84 fr,-r �. % SE 0 11 991 BOOK 84 FLZ Q RESOLUTION NO. 91- 109 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY GENERAL PURPOSE MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the General Purpose Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurl ock , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Alb eel or , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. Attest: 4CaBy Jeffrey --n. Barton, Clerkv Attachment: EXHIBIT 'A'dit '11D I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Richard N. Bird Chairman 18 LIBRARY BONDS Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed millage for the Library Bonds is .3282. Any voted debt service is not subject to rollback; however, if it were applied, it would be a decrease of 2.110. The proposed budget is $1,725,852. The Chairman opened the public hearing on the Library Bonds and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-110 establishing a tax millage rate for the Library Bonds of .3282 mills for fiscal year 1991/92. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 110 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE TAX MILLAGE RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE LIBRARY BOND ISSUE. WHEREAS, the Budget Office of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the Library Bond Issue of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and WHEREAS, the rolled back rate is not applicable to a voted debt service millage levy; and 19 SEP t i 99i B00 8fr' r;,T.E. 4310 SEP 1L 1991 BOOK 84 f,,,;:c WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith levy upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for fiscal year 1991-92 a tax of .3282 mills on the dollar for the purpose of funding the Library Bond Issue of Indian River County; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the millage as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurf ock and the motion was seconded by Commissioner EaQert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Chairman ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-111 approving a budget for the Library Bonds in the amount of $1,725,852 for fiscal year 1991/92. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 111 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, • FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE LIBRARY BOND ISSUE. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the Library Bond Issue are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Boord of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year. 1991-92 for the Library Bond Issue. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurl ock , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye 'Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of SPptemhpr , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: 711116 B Y Richard N. Bird Je f : a . a" Chairman Attachment: EXHIBIT 'A' 21 SEP 11 1991 BOOK BOOK F G[ 4 SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT Administrator Chandler informed those present that the proposed millage is 1.7996 which represents an increase of 16.14% over rollback, and the total proposed budget is $6,609,363. The increases within this proposed budget are consistent with the projections that were presented to the public in the referendum last March for the EMS Equalization Plan. The Chairman opened the public hearing on the South County Fire District and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were t none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-112 establishing a tax millage rate for the South County Fire District of 1.7996 mills for fiscal year 1991/92. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 112 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE TAX MILLAGE RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the South County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and WHEREAS, the proposed millage rate for the South County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit exceeds Z rolled back rate by 16.14%; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith levy upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for fiscal year 1991-92 a tax of 1.7996 mills on the dollar for the purpose of funding the South County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the millage as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurlock , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September SEP 11 `1991 , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Chairman ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-113 approving a budget for the South County Fire District in the amount of $6,609,363 for fiscal year 1991/92. 23 BOOK 8'� f nut ,'�,r 1 SEP 1991 BOOK 84 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 113 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. F:"-;[bf�,, WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the South County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the South County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurlock and the motion was seconded by Commissioner FggPrt , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By ��`li�=—� JefIe.—Barton, Clerk Attachment: EXHIBIT 'A' 24 Richard N. Bird Chairman NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed millage is 1.3500, which is an increase of 46.90% over rollback. The proposed budget is $1,428,705, and this budget is consistent with the projections presented to the public at the March referendum, recognizing that in the North County Fire District, there also was a second question approved by -the voters, which was to increase for this interim period the cap on the millage rate in order to fund the full service being provided at Station 20. The Chairman opened the public hearing on the North County Fire District and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-114 establishing a tax millage rate for the North County Fire District of 1.3500 mills for fiscal year 1991/92. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 114 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE TAX MILLAGE RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Office of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the North County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and 25 SEP 11 b991 BOOK 8t FADE 274 4 SEP 11 199 GOOK 84 PAGE WHEREAS, the proposed millage rate for the North County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit exceeds rolled back rate by 46.90%; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith levy upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for fiscal year 1991-92 a tax of 1.3500 mills on the dollar for the purpose of funding the North County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the millage as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. • The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurlock , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Chairman ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-115 approving a budget for the North County Fire District in the amount of $1,428,705 for fiscal year 1991/92. 26 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 115 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR• 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the North County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the North County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurlock and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September Attest: Je —Bar on, G rk�� V. ot'Cl D�� . Attachment: EXH IT A' , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA L SEP 11 1991 By Richard N. Bird Chairman 27 • BOOK FAL 4, d }i) SEP 1_1 199 WEST COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT TOOK 4 FG[/7 Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed millage is .7791, which is 238.15% over rollback, recognizing that the tax dollars derived from this budget go to fund the operations in the North and South County Fire Districts. The proposed budget is $247,800, a $174,863 increase over last year. This is consistent with what was presented to the voters at the March referendum when it was proposed there would be a phased -in increase this fiscal year with the total coming next year when the total consolidation goes into effect. The Chairman opened the public hearing on the West County Fire District and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-116 establishing a tax millage rate for the West County Fire District of .7791 mills for fiscal year 1991/92. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 11 6 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE TAX MILLAGE RATE • TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WEST COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Office of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the West County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and 28 WHEREAS, the proposed millage rate for the West County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit exceeds rolled back rate by 238.15%; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith levy upon all real and personal taxable property in Indian River County, Florida, for fiscal year 1991-92 a tax of .7791 mills on the dollar for the purpose• of funding the West County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the millage as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner SCu 1 ock and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Egaert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA SEP 1 1. 1991 By Richard N. Bird Chairman ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-117 approving a budget for the West County Fire District in the amount of $247,800 for fiscal year 1991/92. 2 9 • ROOK 4 FA,E . I SEP 11 '9 1 BOOK 84 6� f',1GE /) RESOLUTION NO. 91- 117 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE WEST COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the West County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit' "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the West County Fire District Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Sethi ork and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of. September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Je K•. --Barton, Clerk } Attachment: EXHIBIT 'A' 9• By 30 • Richard N. Bird Chairman • Chairman Bird announced that concludes the hearings on the ad valorem taxing authorities, and we now will go to the non -ad valorem assessment districts. He asked that Administrator Chandler review the first of these, which is Vero Lake Estates M.S.T.U. VERO LAKE ESTATES M.S.T.U. Administrator Chandler announced that it is proposed that the per parcel/acre assessment for the Vero Lake Estates MSTU be increased from $15 to $50, and this is a result of an initial petition received by the Commission to pave certain additional streets within the MSTU. A public hearing was held by the Commission on July 16th, 1991, at the North County Library in regard to the proposed paving of 3 streets - 91st Ave., 101st Ave., and 79th St. - at a total expense of $193,800. At the first public hearing, the Commission had asked that staff go back and pull out each petition we have received regarding the proposed paving and tabulate those signatures, and that is what staff has done. He wished to make it clear that staff has only counted the signatures and has not made any attempt to verify them nor to ascertain if the same name appears on more than one of the petitions. The Chairman requested that Administrator Chandler read the following memo aloud: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: James E. Chandler, County Administrator James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director Vero Lake Estates MSTU Assessment Increase September 11, 1991 FILE: vleass.agn DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS et During the September 5, 1991 Budget Hearing, staff was requested to review all petitions received for the Vero Lake Estates MSTU Assessment increase/road paving program and to determine the number of property owners both supporting and not supporting the program. 31 SEP 11 1W1 BOOK O=f. rAUE u SEP i 199 BOOK 84: The following petitions were received: 1) June 1, 1991 - Petition received not in favor of increasing the assessment, 68 households signed, 89 persons signed. 2) July, 1991 - Petition received in favor of increasing the assessment, 123 households signed, 154 persons signed. 3) August 7, 1991 - Petition received not in favor of increasing the assessment, 104 households, 129 persons signed. It should be noted that many common names appeared on two of the above petitions not in favor. Chairman Bird opened the public hearing on the Vero Lake Estates MSTU and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Mike Anderson, 7835 94th Court, Vero Lake Estates, advised that he has lived out here for 7 years and has seen the condition of the roads go from bad to worse. These roads turn a new car into an old car in about 2 years, and the cost of that is certainly more than the increased MSTU cost. He believed there is a small group of people against the proposed paving from Pine Lake Estates and Less Pine Lakes, and while he sympathized with those people, he felt even those people will benefit from the improvements and urged the Board to vote in favor of paving. Susan Peters, 8980 106th Avenue, Less Pine Lake Estates, informed the Board that she does have additional signatures against the proposed paving and she does have a copy and originals with her. Mrs. Peters stated that according to her figures tallying those opposed, plus letters of opposition, and she checked to make sure she didn't count someone twice, there were 150 individuals opposed, and it equates to 120 households. The original petition showed 35 individuals in addition to the ones on August 7th, and her grand total is 185 individuals against, or 145 households. Chairman Bird asked if Mrs. Peters was saying that she has screened the list and that figure is without duplications, and Mrs. Peters confirmed this. Mrs. Peters noted that another problem they found at last week's meeting was that there was a lot of mention about drainage, and she wished to reiterate why they feel so strongly this is intended more for paving than for drainage. Mrs. Peters then proceeded to quote from numerous PRESS JOURNAL articles which mention only paving. She also believed it was said at the meeting last week that Mr. Ansin, one of the very largest property owners, it not opposed to the proposed project, but the newspaper article said he is one of the opponents. 32 Commission members assured Mrs. Peters that Mr. Ansin did not oppose the project, but actually just stayed moot on the question. Mrs. Peters cited another article from the PRESS JOURNAL, noting that the only mention of drainage was that getting money for a plan for drainage was one of the reasons for setting up the MSTU in the first place, but it also noted that Mr. Davis says that drainage for the subdivision has not yet been designed'. Another article said that after 2 years of collecting the increased assessment, there would be $526,000 to pave the 3 roads, and there would be money left for drainage and implement- ing the Clean Water Act; so, apparently drainage is the secondary issue, which she claimed is not what was stated last week. Mrs. Peters felt there were many contradictory statements made about drainage. She emphasized that the people in her area are really opposed to the proposed increase of assessment at this point in time. It has been brought out again and again that the economy is bad, and to accelerate this program at this time is just not good economics. In addition, the proposed paving will have virtually no benefit at all for the people living in her area and they are seriously asking that the Board reconsider this. Mrs. Peters emphasized that they are not against drainage and have been willing to pay the $15 and not complain because they felt it does go for something, but when their assessment goes up $210, that is a sizeable amount. Chairman Bird asked that Public Works Director Davis confirm that Pine Lakes and Less Pine Lakes are a part of the MSTU and that came about by request. Director Davis reviewed that when the District was estab- lished in the early 1980s, there were public hearings and public input into the limits of the District. Pine Lake Estates and the unplatted area between Pine Lake Estates and Vero Lake Estates was included because it shares the same drainage system and would receive drainage benefits. Chairman Bird, therefore, believed when the improvements are made, it becomes difficult, if not impossible from a legal stand- point, to separate out any entity that is a part of the MSTU. Director Davis agreed and further noted that it would be impractical because they all share a common drainage system. Commissioner Eggert understood how Mrs. Peters got the impression that all that was referred to in the newspaper was paving because the Board in being familiar with paving knows that drainage is an understood part of it. Chairman Bird confirmed that we realize that drainage is a 33 SEP 11 i991 BOOK 84 rFvr �� SEP 11 BOOK 04 F'a:E ►'.;� primary problem, but we have been advised by staff that working on drainage without doing paving is not cost effective. County Attorney Vitunac asked Mr. Davis if there are other funds that are being used for this project besides the MSTU revenue. Director Davis explained that it is a blend of revenue sources. The MSTU revenue is simply one of 3 sources we are using to pave the roads and install the master plan drainage system beneath those roads. It also includes Gas Tax revenues, and in addition, we are assessing the people who actually live on the roads being paved $2.00 a front foot since it is assumed they would benefit to a greater extent than someone who does not live directly on those roads. Mr. Davis further explained that if you calculate the cost of the road paving material, the County is currently paying $29 a ton for asphalt, and with one ton, we can pave about 8 feet of roadway, which equates to about $3.00 a linear foot just to pave the road. Most people when they think of paving think only of asphalt and not all the other things involved - drainage work, the base, sodding, etc. Actually the people living on the roads will pay for the asphalt, and the monies left over from their front foot assessment will be contributed to the base material and the related drainage work. You could really say it is a drainage project and that paving is a minor component, but we usually refer to them as paving projects because people generally relate to paving more than drainage; so, perhaps we have been remiss in not stressing the drainage aspects of the projects more than we have. Attorney Vitunac asked what percent of the total project is paid by the assessment, and Director Davis advised that the MSTU revenue for the next 2 years will fund about 57.2% of the project. Attorney Vitunac noted that, therefore, about 43% is not paid by the assessment at all, and Mr. Davis agreed it is not for the next 2 fiscal years. Attorney Vitunac then wished to know what percent is for drainage as opposed to road paving, and Director Davis advised that classically drainage work is about 50% of a road project - the other 50% is paving, sodding, guard rail, etc. In this case we feel the drainage percentage will be higher than 50% due to the master plan drainage requirements. Attorney Vitunac advised that the point of his questions is to show that most of the people's assessment will pay for drainage rather than paving. Commissioner Scurlock did not think it was fair to suggest that when we created the District everyone was for the paving. 34 He believed that some of the people in the MSTU were thinking only of drainage and the master plan, and he wished to know the total number of dollars that will be raised from the 2 areas that seem to be in opposition. Director Davis believed we are probably talking about 15% of 3,000 acres. A gentleman from the audience interjected that there are 60 acres in Less Pine Lake Estates, and Director Davis noted that those acres at $50 a parcel/acre would generate $3,000. Commissioner Scurlock then asked if you just took the drainage control structure (the one big box culvert), how much is that improvement alone. Director Davis estimated that the culvert itself, including labor probably would be $8,000, and then the head walls are another $6/7000; so, altogether you are probably talking $20,000 for the drainage pipe beneath 89th Street. Commissioner Scurlock commented that, in other words, the benefit would be about $20,000 and only about $3,000 would be generated from that area. He felt that puts it more in perspective. Chairman Bird opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Richard Cook, Less Pine Lake Estates, informed the Board that he has 5 acres of A-1 AG zoning listed as one unit for 5 acres, and as far as getting his moneys worth for the proposed assessment, he stated that he is not. He wished to know the size of the culvert that Mr. Davis intends to put in. Director Davis believed it is about 48", and while he does not have the actual design for all of it, the one culvert on 89th Street has been designed and it would be approximately 60/70' long. The cost of the culvert usually runs about $50 a foot. We use reinforced concrete pipe and we would put it in a DOT Class 2 bedding; therefore, with the pipe, the bedding material, the backfill, wing walls, and there is more than one of those pipes that serve that canal, basically it would amount to the figures he stated earlier of $15,000/20,000. Mr. Cook asked Director Davis if this project has to be paid for in two years and cannot be stretched out, and Commissioner Wheeler noted that decision cannot be made by Mr. Davis. That was the Board's decision to make along with input from the community. Mr. Cook then referred back to the Minutes of the July 16th which state that a Stormwater Utility is a proposed program as part of the Drainage Element of our Comprehensive Land Use Plan and cited Mr. Davis as saying that a typical stormwater utility 35 SEP 11 1991 BOOK 84 F, uC. 4h,iL SEP 11 i9, BOOK . 84 FALL 2 5 levies a utility fee based on equivalent residential units, and if you have one house on 2 or 3 Tots, it is usually charged for one single unit. Mr. Cook pointed out that goes back to what he is trying to say, which is that he is being discriminated against because he has one unit for 5 acres, and that is the same as the unit for 2 or 3 acres. Also, as far as the man being assessed $1.00 a front foot, on an 100' lot that is $200. Director Davis interjected that there are lots on both sides of that street that are being assessed. Mr. Cook contended that in one year he would be paying almost the same amount for only one dwelling on 5 acres as these people will pay on both sides of the road. Chairman Bird asked if Mr. Cook wouldn't agree that 5 acres has the potential of discharging more into the drainage system than one acre does. He believed that is part of the justification for the per parcel/acre assessment. Mr. Cook referred back to the same Minutes and the Notice in the newspaper of that meeting, which he pointed out refers only to paving, and claimed that Pine Lake Estates was not even mentioned in that Notice. Administrator Chandler read aloud the following Notice of that meeting that was advertised in the PRESS JOURNAL: PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC MEETING A PUBLIC MEETING BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WITH THE PROPERTY OWN- ERS OF ALL UNITS OF VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISIONS. PINE LAKES ESTATES SUBDIVI- SION. AND ALL UNPLATTED LANDS WITHIN THE VERO LAKES ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT WILL BE HELD TUESDAY. JULY 16, 1991 AT 7:00 PM IN THE NORTH COUNTY LI- BRARY MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM LOCATED AT 1001 CR 512. THE BOARD. AFTER HEARING COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WILL CONSIDER RAISING THE VERO LAKE ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT ASSESS- MENT FROM $15 PER PARCEUACRE TO S5G PER PARCEUACRE FOR A TWO YEAR PERIOD COMMENCING OCTOBER 1, 1991 AND REVERT- ING BACK TO S15 PER PARCEUACRE OCTO- BER 1, 1993 FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUNDING THE PAVING OF PORTIONS OF 91ST AVENUE. 77TH STREET. AND 101ST AVENUE. ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN VERO LAKE ESTATES ARE ENCOURAGED TO ATTEND. June 18. 25. July 2, 9. 1991 804888 Mr. Cook asked if you are saying that Less Pine Lakes is not an unrecorded plat. Director Davis agreed that Pine Lake Estates Subdivision is an unrecorded plat, but the unplatted area around there is an unrecorded metes and bounds area. Mr. Cook then asked if the County is issuing any building permits for Pine Lake Estates. He believed they are not, and people in Less Pine Lakes are not being able to build on the 36 property they own. He felt you are talking like this place in the North County is some kind of Outer Siberia, but the people there are part of the United States and they pay federal taxes, state taxes, county taxes, non -ad valorem taxes, gas taxes. They can't even have a dirt road going to their house, but yet they are paying for a paved road 2 or 3 miles away from their house that they have to go out and around to get to. Mr. Cook thanked the Board for listening to him, but just wanted them to know that things aren't right, and he felt the County should do a more in depth study of this situation before passing judgment on the north end of the county. Bob Peters, 8980 106th Avenue, Pine Lake Estates, contended, as to the small percentage it was said that they are paying, that the culvert being discussed is not just for them; it covers the whole area. Vero Lake Estates is on both sides and below them. He continued that last week some person said it is not 3 miles from them to where this road is being paved; so, he went out and checked it, and it is 2.7 miles. Mr. Peters wished to know if any of the Commissioners have gone out and looked at the road that is to be paved because if you drive down it, you would see it is all grass. Commissioner Scurlock stated that he has been down there, and Commissioner Bowman noted that she got lost out there. Chairman Bird believed the intent in paving the roads in question is to create a loop, and Director Davis agreed that it is to create a looped paved road system and implement that section of the drainage plan along those roadways to serve a majority of the area. Commissioner Scurlock felt that intent of the paving is just so that everyone, even in the center of that looped area, has a shorter distance to go to get to a good road to get in or out. Mr. Peters stressed that he has no reason to go in that area so he did not see the justification for him to pay for this. Commissioner Wheeler believed the justification is the drainage, but Mr. Peters continued to contend that drainage was not mentioned as part of the project. Commissioner Wheeler believed this was discussed earlier in some detail. He again explained that when we say paving, we also mean drainage - it is similar to saying that you are buying a car and tires. The drainage is part of the engineering and design of a roadway, and a paved road actually helps drainage. Mr. Peters then also wished to know why this has to be done in 2 years, especially because of the state of the economy. Can it be stretched out possibly 4 years. 37 BOOK 84 f A,. : SEP 11 i991 bJOB BOOK 84 fA E 2,8 1 Chairman Bird believed that part of the thinking is that at the $15 level we are barely treading water and, in fact, almost sliding backwards in making the improvements that are needed. He noted that to him this MSTU is like a community. He likened it to the people in the City of Vero Beach paying taxes for putting in the Twin Pairs project whether or not they live anywhere near it. He felt the point is that you have a community and even if not everyone sees the benefits of these particular improvements immediately, hopefully future improvements will be made in the community that will benefit another part of it more directly. This is a communitywide assessment area, and he would hope over a period of time, the assessments and the benefits will equal out. Commissioner Wheeler believed that the direct benefit is for the drainage for the community, and paved roads are part of that, and Director Davis confirmed that there will be a direct benefit to that whole watershed area from the drainage improvements. John Coppola, 7950 93rd Ave., spoke on behalf of himself and all those in favor of the proposed paving. He wished to thank the County Commissioners for their time and effort in thinking about what his group proposed and for trying to better their community. Mrs. Melanie Manning, Vero Lake Estates resident, wished to point out to those opposed that the MSTU began in 1982, and we are only going to get a raise in the assessment in 1992. In that 10 years, we have only put in 1 mile of paved road; so, we are looking at hundreds of thousands of dollars that have gone to better this community in the drainage area. She felt it is time that we start putting some of those dollars into helping the drainage program with some paved roads. Stan Fronczek, 8365 95th Court, sympathized with the people in Pine Lake Estates, but noted that although he never will see paved roads in front of his house in his time, he worked hard to try to get these roads paved to benefit the majority of the people. He expressed the hope that 101st Avenue is going to be paved very shortly. The Chairman determined that no one else wished to be heard, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-118 establishing an assessment rate for Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit of $50.00 per parcel/acre for fiscal year 1991/92. 38 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 118 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE VERO LAKE ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith assess a rate of $50.00 per parcel/acre or any portion of an acre of real property within the boundaries of the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County; 39 SEP 11 M1 POCK .�J�1 SEP 1 i99 ?;;� BOOK e FA�t 2 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assessment as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurl ock , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September Attest:0 8, \\',,,,,,,,,,,i rey K. 'Barton, Clerk , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Chairman ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-119 approving a budget for Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit in the amount of $193,800 for fiscal year 1991/92. 40 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 119 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE VERO LAKE ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant County to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be• levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Rowan put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Wheeler , and, upon being Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The. Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest: JeffreyiKnirtr Attachment HIBIT Clerk L SEP • By Richard N. Bird. 41 Chairman POOK A -57411n Om - 4111!!t Om- Emel ono NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: Federal Sources State Sources Local Sources Non—Ad Valorem Assessments Sub—Total Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) Net Transfers Cash Forward—October 1, 1991 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES APPROPRIATIONS: General Government Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation Economic Environment Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfund Transfers TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward—September 30, 1992 TOTAL BUDGET 1991/92 PROPOSED CHARGE: D:\123R3\AD9192\PAG E2 REVISED: 09-06-91 VERO LAKES ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT 0 0 5,000 199,000 204,000 (10,200) 193,800 0 0 193,800 0 0 0 183,060 0 0 0 0 183,060 10,740 0 193,800 $50.00 PER/PARCEL ACRE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 0 200,000 1,619,000 4,186,230 6,005,230 (300,262) 5,704,968 0 2,014,339 7,719,307 0 0 6,396,170 0 0 0 0 0 6,396,170 74,366 1,248,771 7,719,307 $35.32 PER WASTE GENERATION UNIT co o_ 0 co ca >. 4- L c a) a) E a) t a) a) U a) L Chairman 0 .c 0: Lf) 0 co members present m E co a) t +-, .c reconvened SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Administrator Chandler announced that the proposed Waste Generation Unit (WGU) for the next fiscal year as amended from the amount of $35.46 shown on the TRIM notice is $35.32 per WGU, and the proposed budget is $7,719,307, The Chairman opened the public hearing on the Solid Waste Disposal District and asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-120 establishing an assessment rate for the Solid Waste Disposal District of $35.32 per Waste Generation Unit (WGU) for fiscal year 1991/92. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 120 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the Solid Waste Disposal District Issue of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and 43 SEP 1991 ��'' �ia-� BOCK. U F'�r �., SEP 1 1 199 BOOK 84 PAGE. WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith assess a rate of $35.32 per waste generation unit; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assessment as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Wheel er , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Aye Aye Aye Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By� /(i12.-4& Richard N. Bird Chairman ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-121 approving a budget for the Solid Waste Disposal District of $7,719.307 for fiscal year 1991/92. 44 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 121 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs and the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the Solid Waste Disposal District are •hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the Solid Waste Disposal District. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Wheeler , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11• day of SeptPmhPr , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attachment: EXHIBIT 'A' SEP l i991 By / 45 Richard N. Bird Chairman BOOK EXHIBIT NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: Federal Sources State Sources Local Sources Non—Ad Valorem Assessments Sub—Total Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) Net Transfers Cash Forward—October 1, 1991 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES APPROPRIATIONS: General Government Public Safety Physical Environment Transportation Economic Environment Human Services Culture/Recreation Interfund Transfers TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Reserve for Contingencies Cash Forward—September 30, 1992 TOTAL BUDGET 1991/92 PROPOSED CHARGE: D:\123R3\AD9192\PAGE2 REVISED: 09-06-91 VERO LAKES ESTATES MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT 0 0 5,000 199,00(1 204,000 (10,200) 193,800 0 0 193,800 0 0 0 183,060 0 0 0 0 183,060 10,740 0 193,800 $50.00 PER/PARCEL ACRE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT 0 200,000 1,619,000 4,186,230 6,005,230 (300,262) 5,704,968 0 2,014,339 7,719,307 0 0 6,396,170 0 0 0 0 0 6,396,170 74,366 1,248,771 7,719,307 • $35.32 PER WASTE GENERATION UNIT 1 1 1 STREETLIGHTING DISTRICTS The Chairman informed those present that at this time OMB Director Baird would read aloud the proposed per parcel/acre charge for each street lighting district and the budget for each, after which anyone who wishes to speak regarding a certain district may be heard. OMB Director Baird read the following aloud: DISTRICT Parcel/Acre Budget Gifford $ 17.50 $ 54,449 Laurelwood $ 22.00 $ 10,842 Rockridge $ 5.00 $ 4,403 Vero Highlands $ 25.00 $ 63,956 Porpoise Point $ 30.00 $ 1.776 Single Streetlights N/A $ 5,354 Laurel Court $ 33.00 $ 1,005 Tierra Linda $ N/A $ 4,636 Vero Shores $ 26.00 $ 6,314 Ixora Park $ 23.00 $ 8,583 Royal Poinciana $ 31.00 $ 14,804 Roseland Road $ 6.00 $ 3,636 ** ** The Single Streetlights budget will be included in Budget Resolution with other non -taxing funds of the County. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding any of the above listed Street Lighting Districts, and Mr. Fred Mensing of Roseland wished to be heard regarding the Roseland Road Street Lighting District. 47 SEP 11 X991 Pooh 8 f',•Gc,;,oy� SEP I1 BOOK 8fCEr� ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT Chairman Bird asked that Public Works Director Davis explain the charge for the Roseland Road Street Lighting District. Director Davis- informed those present that about a year ago, the Board responded to a petition submitted by the Roseland Property Owners Association, a fairly large group with a good cross section of people from that area. This group requested street lighting on the Roseland Road corridor. Basically with the Sebastian River bordering this district to the north and the Sebastian Airport to the south, it actually creates a linear geologic area. All the subdivisions that branch off of Roseland Road have to use Roseland Road itself for their ingress and egress. There are no connections into the City of Sebastian to Main Street to the south, and, therefore, Director Davis felt this was a linear concise community. He explained that due to the geographic characteristics of that area, when the Roseland Street Lighting District was developed, we proposed that we include in the benefitted area all those areas that have to use Roseland Road for ingress and egress. Mr. Davis pointed out on a map the boundaries of the district, and advised it is staff's feeling that all the property within the District benefits from the street lighting along Roseland Road, and the District is levying $6.00 per parcel/acre, which he felt is a minimal cost. Mr. Fred Mensing, resident of Roseland, advised that those who are complaining about the assessment live in Section 30, and according to the map referred to Mr. Davis, they are not included in the District; so, either his TRIM Notice is wrong or the map is incorrect. Director Davis explained that the map in question does not contain that particular section. There is one area that does go south of what is shown on the map, and it is established in the legal description written into the District. He believed that Mr. Mensing has to use Roseland Road for ingress and egress to his property. Mr. Mensing advised that he is not objecting to being included in the District, but he is objecting to the method of billing per parcel/acre. Specifically, in this Section 30, they have one county street that penetrates it for 1/4 mile - 129th St. - and they have a street which penetrates that Section which they share with the City of Sebastian - 130th St. It is because of the lack of penetration of public streets that he brings the objection forward, not for paying something but in regard to paying more than their fair share for more than they can benefit. Mr. Mensing then referred to Lot 7 in this Section owned by Louis Simone, which Mr. Simone has the ability to subdivide and make 48 into 8 or 20 Tots and noted that he can see some equity there. Lot 6 east of that, however, which is 5 acres was purchased by Mark Smith in total rather than 1/2 after the title company refused to insure it as a one-time split because it did not meet the criteria relating to road frontage. Lot 5 owned by Mr. Larson has the same problem. Mr. Mensing continued to list property in this area where a one-time split is not obtainable, He noted that he personally owns and lives on Lot 15. He has 5 acres zoned AG and he is being asked to pay $30. The Semblers own 15 acres zoned AG, and the County is asking them to pay $90 for raw land that could only be developed at a maximum of 3 homes. Mr. Mensing contended they should pay $18 not $90, and if he did his arithmetic right, he is asking the Board to make an adjustment where they collect from the people in this area $78 in lieu of $372 and carry forward $400 instead of something in excess of $700 next year without making any other adjustment. He clarified that he is asking that the Board adjust the ordinance for any person who can demonstrate that he has in excess of 1 acre in this district that cannot be split without a zoning change or a road being built so that they pay for one unit for their entire parcel and not per parcel/acre as written. Mr. Mensing believed the majority have 60 x 140 lots, and contended that at the rate of $6.00 a home, you have enough money to support the District with the budget presented with the change he is requesting. Chairman Bird felt that the argument he made earlier about the benefits accruing to everyone from the drainage project were valid, but he was not as positive he could make the same argument about the benefits from the street lights. Director Davis explained that the logic of assessing on a per parcel/acre basis is the more land you have in the benefitted are, the more benefit it would have on your property. The street lighting is within the community of Roseland; it is a linear and distinct corridor; and everyone Mr. Mensing just talked about accesses the Roseland Road corridor. The philosophy of this District was to create a safe major collector roadway through the Roseland corridor, and Director Davis did not feel you can dispute the fact that the Roseland Road corridor serves the whole described area in an equal way. You can access property whether it is 5 acres and AG the same as you access any other property. The streetlight district was designed along the whole benefitted area, and we find no inequity in the assessment program. Chairman Bird asked if there is any way to do this adjust- ment Mr. Mensing is suggesting now, and then if these properties are further divided, catch them at that time. 49 BOOK 84 F E 2 SEP 11 11"s)9 I SEP 111991 BOOK Director Davis pointed out that is an ever changing situation, and there are so many parameters that get mixed up in it (zoning codes, water and sewer, etc.) that you would have to hire more people to orchestrate such a program. Administrator Chandler further pointed out that the method- ology we applied in the formula in Roseland is the same we have applied in all of the other street lighting districts; it is on the same basis as all the others. Attorney Vitunac asked if Mr. Mensing wants to subdivide his property some day into more units than one, isn't that his choice, and Director Davis was sure that he can utilize his property in accordance with the County Comprehensive Land Use Plan and regulations just as any other citizen can. Mr. Mensing agreed that the benefit received by the District is the benefit of having a safe corridor to drive on. He does not dispute that benefit, but he does dispute the fact that his family (with one home on 5 acres) pays 5 times what the majority pay when they basically are going to have the same number of trip ends. He continued to argue about splitting deeds, subdividing, the cost of challenging this in court, etc., and felt that the County needs to look at the law about who benefits and the fact that the one who lives on 5 acres gets no more benefit. They, in fact, get less benefit than those who live on Roseland Road, and there is no more benefit than that received by someone with only one lot. Chairman Bird believed there is one benefit, and that is that similar to Vero Lake Estates MSTU, any improvement that makes this a better community will have a direct benefit to all property owners within the district, and someday they will reap the benefits from the increased property values that result. Mr. Mensing did not see how, in view of the current economy, the Board can justify anything being done that would result in increasing property values because that just runs taxes up, and that is what the people are here talking against. Attorney Vitunac commented that a street lighting district is just the reverse of a drainage district - water flows off the drainage district, and light flows on the street lighting district. Mr. Mensing obviously does not get as many lumens on his property as someone on Roseland Road, but he does get the same benefit from driving on Roseland Road. If he had a 5 acre parcel that could never be built on but for one unit, then he has a point, but Attorney Vitunac believed the Zoning Code gives him the power to subdivide in some way; so, the key to getting more benefits is in his own pocket. 50 Commissioner Scurlock further pointed out that the budget changes every year, and lights can be added or even deleted. Commissioner Eggert did not believe that we can change the ordinance tonight in any event and asked about our options to do something for Mr. Mensing. Attorney Vitunac advised that this Board actually is a board of adjustment and has the power to give some relief tonight if they wish to. Mr. Mensing again presented his argument that the Roseland road residents reap 2 benefits - the safety factor and the light, and he continued to stress that the benefit is per family unit and should be assessed per lot as recorded and then you could have total equity. Chairman Bird believed that Mr. Mensing makes some good points, but noted that he would find it very difficult to vote in his favor tonight because this is only one of 12 street lighting districts, and staff uses the same formula for all. He would not, however, object to staff looking at this during the next year to see if there is a more equitable method. Commissioner Wheeler asked if we have an ability to make an adjustment based on Mr. Mensing's arguments without changing the ordinance. Attorney Vitunac stated that the Board does have the ability to make that decision with Mr. Mensing but noted that it then would have to be applied consistently and fairly with anyone else in the same position. This would just apply to the person requesting it tonight, and then you would have to give it to Director Davis as an order to proceed with making a change in the ordinance. Chairman Bird again stated his preference just to have staff look at this during the year. Attorney Vitunac informed the Board that his office is presently working.with Director Davis to try to unify all these districts into one. Discussion continued regarding the many ways to look at this, and Chairman Bird determined that no one else wished to be hard. He thereupon closed the public hearing on Roseland Road Street Lighting District. Commissioner Eggert agreed that it is kind of late to be considering this, but she did agree with Mr. Mensing's point of view when it comes to.lighting as opposed to drainage, and Commissioner Scurlock felt this district is unique in that it has a corridor as opposed to a .service area. Commissioner Wheeler understood the argument but was 51 BOOK PPE SEP i 1 99 L B0x 84, SEP 111991 concerned about doing this without creating a real big problem and spreading it through all the districts. Administrator Chandler pointed out that if we look at a change in the formula in this and all districts, it would have to be submitted and considered by the Commission and adopted before January 1st. Commissioner Eggert still wished to know if as an adjustment board we can make this adjustment for Fred Mensing who has 5 acres and came in and asked, and the rest who did not come in and ask would continue on in the same way and then we will change it next year. Attorney Vitunac confirmed that can be done just for Mir. Mensing because no one else has met their burden of proof. Director Davis expressed his confusion as to how we can take an ordinance adopted in a public hearing and establishing a particular MSTU, and then in budget and without that due process, manipulate the ordinance and change methods of assessment that are established in the ordinance. Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that Attorney Vitunac is saying that we are not doing that - that we are considering it as an equalization board and making an adjustment, not changing the mechanism or the ordinance. Attorney Vitunac further noted that this doesn't destroy the validity of the ordinance, but just recognizes that in individual cases the process may be unfair. Administrator Chandler raised the question as to how we spread the balance of the cost to the other property owners who aren't here if we reduce the assessment for Mr. Mensing. Commissioner Scurlock believed we could take that amount from reserves, but OMB Director Baird did not feel that could be done because the Property Appraiser has a tax code that runs throughout, and he would have to reduce everyone else. Chairman Bird continued to stress that he is all for studying this and then fixing it if we find the ordinance is wrong, and Commissioner Wheeler agreed that it seems like we are running a considerable risk for the Commission to get involved in all this now just for $24.00. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Bowman, the Board unanimously agreed to stay with the proposed $6.00 per parcel/acre assessment for the Roseland Road Street Lighting District and instructed staff to look into this during the next fiscal year as discussed. 52 G I FFORD_STREET-LIGHTING DISTRICT Administrator Chandler reminded the Board that a Mr. Fink raised a question regarding the assessment for this District at the last Budget hearing. Mr. Fink is not here tonight, but the Administrator wished to respond to Mr. Fink's question that he is being assessed consistent with the policy and everyone else within that District. The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard regarding the Gifford Street Lighting District. There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing. Commissioner Scurlock asked if we were to add to the budget one light for Mr. Fink, when do we do that; does it have to wait another year; or can't we just modify the budget tonight? Director Davis felt the Board can, but noted that on a policy basis, staff's feeling is that when people want lights added or subtracted, that can be brought to the Board at one time during the year instead of repeatedly, but Commissioner Scurlock asked if this isn't the time. Administrator Chandler explained the policy usually followed, noting that the one light being discussed would in- crease the budget by a certain number of dollars and then there is the question of does that change the rates. Commissioner Scurlock believed if we add one light, we could take it out of contingency. After some further discussion, OMB Director Baird advised that he felt we can absorb one light without substantially affecting the proposed budget. Commissioner Scurlock noted that he would like to do that rather than have Mr. Fink wait another year. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously agreed to add one light within the Gifford Street Lighting District as discussed above. The Chairman determined that no one wished to be heard regarding any of the remaining Streetlighting Districts, and thereupon closed the public hearings on all of the Streetlighting Districts. 53 SEP 111091 0(9K � � p- SEP I '1 W BOOK 84 ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted Resolutions establishing per parcel/acre assessments for the Streetlighting Districts for fiscal year 1991/92, as set out in the following list: DISTRICT Gifford Laurelwood Rockridge Vero Highlands Porpoise Point Single Streetlights Laurel Court Tierra Linda Vero Shores Ixora Park Royal Poinciana Roseland Road Resolution Parcel/Acre No. $ 17.50 91-122 $ 22.00 91-124 $ 5.00 91-126 $ 25.00 91-128 $ 30.00 91-130 N/A $ 33.00 91-132 $ N/A $ 26.00 91-135 $ 23.00 91-137 $ 31.00 91-139 $ 6.00 91-141 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 122 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE GIFFORD STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Office of Indian River County prepared and presented to the County Commission a tentative budget for the Gifford Street Lighting Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County, Florida, for the fiscal year commencing on the first day of October, 1991, and ending on the 30th day -of September, 1992, addressing each of the funds therein as provided by law, including all estimated receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward, and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County held numerous public workshops to consider and amend the tentative budget as presented; and 54 WHEREAS, the Board did prepare a statement summarizing all of the tentative budgets showing for each budget and for the total of all budgets, proposed tax millages, the balances and reserves, and the total of each major classification of the receipts and expenditures classified according to accounts prescribed by the appropriate state agencies; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did hold a public hearing to review and adopt a tentative budget; and WHEREAS, the final budget hearing has been properly advertised and held in accordance with applicable Florida law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that this Board does herewith assess a rate of $17.50 per parcel/acre or any portion of an acre of real property within the boundaries of the Gifford Street Lighting Municipal Service Taxing Unit of Indian River County; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assessment as adopted herein shall be filed in the Office of the County Auditor and in the Public Records; and the County Auditor shall transmit forthwith a certified copy of this resolution to the Property Appraiser for Indian River County, to the Tax Collector for Indian River County, and to the Department of Revenue of the State of Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Wheeler , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margarpt C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Chairman THE REMAINDER OF THE STREETLIGHTING MILLAGE RESOLUTIONS WILL BE INCLUDED ONLY BY TITLE - ALL RESOLUTIONS ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD IN THEIR ENTIRETY. 55 BOOK 8 SEP it t9 L SEP i i 1tR,. 900K 84 F',i,t�� RESOLUTION NO. 91- 124 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON _ ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE LAURELWOOD STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 126 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE ROCKRIDGE STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 128 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE VERO HIGHLANDS STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 130 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE PORPOISE POINT STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 132 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE LAUREL COURT STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 1-jr; A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE VERO SHORES STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. 56 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 137 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE IXORA PARK STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE DISTRICT. RESOLUTION NO. 91-139 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE TAX MILLAGE RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE ROYAL POINCIANA PARK STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 141 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT RATE TO BE LEVIED UPON ALL REAL AND PERSONAL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR THE ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolutions approving budgets for the Streetlighting Districts for fiscal year 1991/92, as set out in the following list: ** The Single Streetlights budget will be included in Budget Resolution with other non -taxing funds of the County. i 57 ��r�K F„�c.�J J Resolution DISTRICT Budget No. w Gifford $ 54,449 91-123 Laurelwood $ 10,842 91-125 Rockridge $ 4,403 91-127 Vero Highlands $ 63,956 91-129 Porpoise Point $ 1,776 91-131 Single Streetlights $ 5,354 ** Laurel Court $ 1,005 91-133 Tierra Linda $ 4,636 91-134 Vero Shores $ 6,314 91-136 Ixora Park $ 8,583 91-138 Royal Poinciana $ 14,804 91-140 Roseland Road $ 3,636 91-142 ** The Single Streetlights budget will be included in Budget Resolution with other non -taxing funds of the County. i 57 ��r�K F„�c.�J J SEP i i 91 BOOK 84 F'AGEo,�� RESOLUTION NO. 91-123_ A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR ' 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE GIFFORD STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Indian River County has ascertained the needs alld the fiscal policy of the Board of County Commissioners for the ensuing fiscal year and did prepare and present to the Board a tentative budget for fiscal year 1991-92 including all estimates of receipts, taxes to be levied, and balances expected to be brought forward and all estimated expenditures, reserves, and balances to be carried over at the end of the year; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County did examine the tentative budget and held public hearings, pursuant to law, to consider input from the citizens of Indian River County with respect to taxes to be levied and the amounts and the use of money derived from the levy of taxes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD, OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The County Budget Officer's estimates of receipts other than taxes and of balances to be brought forward for the Gifford Street Lighting Municipal Service Taxing Unit are hereby revised as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County hereby adopts the attached budget as the final budget for fiscal year 1991-92 for the Gifford Street Lighting Municipal Service Taxing Unit. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Whee4. ler , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of �Sentemher , 1991. test: JeBart Clerk Attachment: EXHIBI BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Chairman 58 I 1 rT� 1 NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS D:\123R 3 W D919Z\PAG E3 REVISED: 09-06-91 LAUREL.- ROCK- VERO . PORPOISE LAUREL 77ERRA VERO IXORA ROYAL ROSELAND J J GIFFORD WOOD RIDGE HIGHLANDS POINT COURT LINDA SHORES PARK POINCIANA ROAD STREET STREET STREET STREET STREET SINGLE STREET STREET STREET STREET STREET STREET LIGHTING LIGHTINGLIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHT LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING CQ DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISIRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT• DISTRICT ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: F- Q U Z Non -Ad Valorem Assessment 57,015 5,808 1,935 40,100 1,320 0 1,030 4,780 5,616 6,348 11,873 3,828 Local Sources 300 944 595 2,820 160 0 28 100 440 396 552 0 Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 3,790 0 0 0 0 0 0 Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b)2( )i (338) (127) (2.146) (74) (190) (53) (244) (303) (337) (621) (192) Sub -Total 54,449 6,414 2,403 40,774 1,406 3,600 11005 4,636 5,753 6,407 11.804 3,636 Cash Forward -October 1, 1991 0 4.428 2.000 23.182 370 1.754 0 0 561 2,176 3.000 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES 54,449 10,842 4,40363,956 1,776 5,354 11005 4,636 6,314 8jS3 14,804 3.636 APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES: M Y rY >- w W Utilities 48,900 5,500 2,000 52,778 612 5,254 739 1,650 4,311 6,525 10,770 2.375 Administration/Collection 2,759 733 445 3,728 354 100 154 119M 633 648 9S1 M3 Advertising 100 100 100 100 100 0 12 60 100 100 100 25 Maintenance 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 51,759 6,333 2,745 56,106 1,066 5,354 905 3,610 5,034 7,573 11,851 2,743 Reserve for Contingencies 0 600 300 2,000 125 0 100 300 443 158 100 100 Cash Forward -September 30, 1992 2.690 3.909 1,358 5.850 585 0 0 726 827 852 2.853 793 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES 54,449 10,842 4,403 63,956 1,776 5,354 1,005 4,636 6,314 8,83 14,804 3.676 Proposed Per Parcel/Acre Charge 51730 522.00 55.00 S25A0 530.00 N/A 533.00 N/A 526.00 523.00 531.00 56.00 D:\123R 3 W D919Z\PAG E3 REVISED: 09-06-91 W d J J W z z O W J Z) J LL CD O z CQ O W 0� W W F- Q U Z to Q z W m - tY F- - Z J = M F- O F- rn = W z - J J, Q Uj ¢ W O = I M N W W W F- F_ F- F- O F- O M Y rY >- w W J J Q z U z O W W O W IY 0 O W U -I W U W �. F=- - O ' 11�M e� BOOK 90 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 125 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE LAURELWOOD STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91-1127 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE ROCKRIDGE STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 199 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE VERO HIGHLANDS STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91-_.L31 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE PORPOISE POINT STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- ill A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE LAUREL COURT STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. 60 I RESOLUTION NO. 91- 1,3Q A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE TIERRA LINDA STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91-136 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE VERO SHORES STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91-138 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE IXORA PARK STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE DISTRICT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 140 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE ROYAL POINCIANA PARK STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. RESOLUTION NO. 91- 142 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE COUNTY BUDGET OFFICER'S ESTIMATES OF RECEIPTS OTHER THAN TAXES AND OF BALANCES TO BE BROUGHT FORWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 AND ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE ROSELAND ROAD STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT. y 61 [[��r (}rr''y f!y [ yd I,iLk (". �;"� 3�4 L'UUf`. V �� F1�'JL ''Jr,�L+ „w:,;y 999 SEP 111'991 BOOK 84 ENTERPRISE 8 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS - OTHER FUNDS - OTHER DEBT FUNDS Chairman Bird announced that at this time we would go over the Enterprise 6 Internal Service Funds, Other Funds, and Other - Debt Funds, all of which are non -taxing funds, and he asked that OMB Director Baird announce the proposed budgets for these funds. OMB Director Baird read aloud the following: Enterprise_ 6_ Internal_ Service_ Funds Proposed_ Budget Golf Course $ 1,810,270 Building Department 1,210,494 Water 6 Sewer Utilities 9,699,140 Utilities Impact Fee 5,398,533 Fleet Management 1,157,790 Self -Insurance Fund 1,132,529 Other Funds Special Revenue $13,855,450 Capital Projects 16,582,680 Other Debt Funds 1985 Refunding 8 Improvement Bonds $ 1,438,605 Route 60 Sewer Assessment Bond 378,036 Route 60 Water Assessment Bond 80,000 Rockridge Special Assessment Bond 162,195 North County Sewer Assessment Bond 1,388,538 Chairman Bird asked if anyone wished to be heard in regard to any of the above listed funds. There were none, and he thereupon closed the public hearing on same. ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by Com- missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-143 approving budgets for all the above listed funds (including the Single Light District announced earlier) for fiscal year 1991/92. 62 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 143 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 FOR CERTAIN NONTAXING FUNDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County has held the necessary budget hearings as provided by Florida law, has considered all expenditures set forth in the budgets, and now determines that adoption of the budgets is in the best interest of the citizens of Indian River County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts the budgets set forth in Exhibits A, B, C and D to this resolution for this following funds: STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT Single Light District ENTERPRISE & INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Golf Course Building Department Water & Sewer Utilities Utilities Impact Fee Fleet Management Self -Insurance Fund OTHER FUNDS Special Revenue Capital Projects OTHER DEBT FUNDS 1985 Refunding & Improvement Bonds Route 60 Sewer Assessment Bond Route 60 Water Assessment Bond ° Rockridge Special Assessment Bond North County Sewer Assessment Bond The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner WhPPI Pr , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner -Eggert , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ,Attest: By /� r.� tr% Richard N. Bird Je K.- liar on,, Glgxk Chairman Attachments: 11"E IBITS , B, C & D e� 63 �UCJK `• �r'.1� SEP I i ��`� 0 0 NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: D:\123R3\AD9192\PAGE3 REVISED: 09-06-91 Non -Ad Valorem Assessment ROCK- Local Sources PORPOISE Contributions LAUREL Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) VERO Sub -Total ROYAL Cash Forward -October 1, 1991 GIFFORD TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES RIDGE APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES: POINT Utilities COURT Administration/Collection SHORES Advertising POINCIANA Maintenance STREET TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS STREET Reserve for Contingencies STREET Cash Forward -September 30,1992 STREET TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND RESERVES STREET Proposed Per Parcel/Acre Charge STREET STREET LIGHTING LIGHTING D:\123R3\AD9192\PAGE3 REVISED: 09-06-91 fJ 1 LAUREL- ROCK- VERO PORPOISE LAUREL TIERRA VERO IXORA ROYAL ROSELAND GIFFORD WOOD RIDGE HIGHLANDS POINT COURT LINDA SHORES PARK POINCIANA ROAD STREET STREET STREET STREET STREET SINGLE STREET STREET STREET STREET STREET STREET LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHT LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT 57,015 5,808 1,935 40,100 020 0 1,030 4,780 5,616 6,348 11,873 3,828 300 944 595 2,820 160 0 28 100 440 396 552 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,790 0 0 0 0 0 0 (2,866) (338) (127) (2,146) (74) (190) (53) (244) (303) (337) (621) (192). 54,449 6,414 2,403 40,774 1,406 3,600 1,005 4,636 5,753 6,407 11,804 3,636 0 4,428 2,000 23,182 370 1,754 0 0 561 2,176 3.000 0 54,449 10,842 4,403 63,956 1,776 5,354 1,005 4,636 6514 8,583 14,804 3,636 48,900 5,500 2,000 52,778 612 5,254 739 1,650 4,311 6,825 10,770 2,375 2,759 733 445 3,228 354 100 154 1,900 633 648 981 343 100 100 100 100 100 0 12 60 100 100 100 25 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51,759 6,333 2,745 56,106 1,066 5,354 905 3,610 5,044 7,573 11,851 2,743 0 600 300 2,000 125 0 100 300 443 158 100 100 2,690 3,909 1,358 5,850 585 0 0 726 827 852 2,853 793 54,449 10,842 4,403 63,956 1,776 5,354 1,005 4,636 6,314 8,583 14,804 3,636 $1750 $22.00 55.00 $25.00 $30.00 N/A $33.00 N/A 526.00 $23.00 S31.00 56.00 fJ 1 t ENTERPRISE AND INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Ln cD 0 an SELF GOLF BUILDING WATER & SEWER UTILITIES FLEET INSURANCE COURSE DEPARTMENT UTILITIES IMPACT FEE MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND REVENUES: User Fees 1,533,180 450,500 9,425,610 - 5,682,667 1,157,790 1,146,139 Interest Income 22,000 85,000 340,000 0 .0 45,996 Lacs 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) (77,759) (26,775) (488,280) (284,134) 0 (59,606) Cash Forward—October 1, 1991 332,849 701,769 421,810 0 0 0 TOTAL REVENUES 1,810x70 1,210,494 9,699,140 5,398,533 1,157,790 1,132,529 EXPENSES: Golf Course Maintenance 1,773,449 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicle Maintenance 0 0 0 0 1,137,132 0 Water/Sewer Combination Services 0 0 9,451,479 598,533 0 0 Self Insurance 0 0 0 0 0 1,129,059 Protective Services 0 979,692 0 0 0 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reserves 36,821 30,802 152,661 0 20,658 3,470 Cash Forward—September 30,1992 0 200,000 95,000 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,810,270 1,210,494 9,699,140 5,398,533 1,157,790 1,132,529 1�1 Ln cD 0 an C) do 8 OTHER DEBT FUNDS 1� ROUTE 60 ROUTE 60 ROCKRIDGE NORTH CTY. 1985 REF. SEWER WATER SPECIAL . SEWER & IMPROV. ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT BONDS BOND BOND BOND BOND ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: Federal Sources 0 0 0 0 0 State Sources 1,398,890 0 0 0 0 Local Sources 80,000 387,406 60,000 128,626 1,088,538 Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) (73,945) (19,370) (3,000) (6,431) 0 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 Cash Forward—October 1, 1991 33,660 10,000 23,000 40,000 300,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES 1,438,605 378,036 80,000 162,195 1,388,538 APPROPRIATIONS: General Government 1,438,605 378,036 0 122,195 1,088,538 Public Safety 0 0 0 0 0 Physical Environment 0 0 0 0 0 Transportation 0 0 0 0 0 Economic Environment 0 0 0 0 0 Human Services 0 0 0 0 0 Culture/Recreation 0 0 0 0 0 Interfund Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 1,438,605 378,036 0 122,195 1,088,538 Reserve for Contingencies 0 0 0 0 0 Cash Forward—September 30,1992 0 0 80,000 40,000 300.000 TOTAL BUDGET 1,438,605 378,036 80,000 162,195 1,388,538 1� L 1 O E 4- 0 -0 0 +es m m � +j +j .0 la.. co O L Q7 W m 4 0 o Z >• L O — O co U tn — O W :3 7 >. N E N — •- L O +� C U U L co N N O C .... i� 3 r0 4— W •a Ol L L C O Lfo •— 4— O O > C m O -0 O L D m s Q U N ++ co v - _.r— C __.rO 0 co U UI.-O -0 m _0 C Z L O L ® O O C N O m m o Z O E n to L O O O � L 0 C. U .0 O C V) +-, N O OTHER FUNDS z C Q L .0 o Q 0) ++ 4— _Q L SPECIAL 4� N O 3 REVENUE CAPITAL co .0 co 4-J O FUNDS PROJECTS +' O 'O L ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES: +,M -C Federal Sources 955,542 0 C N w *' State Sources 1,048,326 1,000,000 N N Local Sources 6,176,333 5,717,534 O -C C E Less 5% per F. S. 129.01(2)(b) (409,009) (335,877) Q C @ N Transfers 424,852 80,000 to C) Cash Forward -October 1, 1991 5,659,406 10,121,023 (D to 0 N O C O TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS AND BALANCES 13,855,450 16,582,680 O -0 s.. +j .0 ++ O 0- co L l) C U a� •- APPROPRIATIONS: •D General Government 304,003 1,483,500 to I uji N E 4-' O co Public Safety 98,000 0 I--1 L. O C U -C Physical Environment 0 0 CE1 O U co v Transportation 9,545,465 9,950,000 j C N 4- .v Economic Environment 90,504 0 LLI U — Human Services 1,195,395 0 � j -p j Culture/Recreation Transfers 352,350 117,426 675,355 0 =O1 U s- Y N Interfund C- TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS 11,703,143 0 1 CO co m O s Reserve for Contingencies 797,821 2,473,825 W I 1l C' 0 � Cash Forward -September 30, 1992 1,354,486 2,000,000 Q 1 O O M _0 TOTAL BUDGET 13,855,450 16,582,680 U I - -C E Q O s- W1 O a) O I L L co .0 — U �I 4- U _0 1 O :3 p I co L N 01 c0 � O 4- N O t O >. L ++ L 1 O E 4- 0 -0 0 +es m m � +j +j .0 la.. co O L Q7 W m 4 0 o Z >• L O — O co U tn — O W :3 7 >. N E N — •- L O +� C U U L co N N O C .... i� 3 r0 4— W •a Ol L L C O Lfo •— 4— O O > C m O -0 O L D m s Q U N ++ co v - _.r— C __.rO 0 co U UI.-O -0 m _0 C Z L O L ® O O C N O m m o Z O E n to SEP i1 1991 i RESOLUTION NO. 91- 144 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING A SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR THE SANDRIDGE GOLF CLUB FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92; AUTHORIZING FUTURE RATE AMENDMENTS BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND BUDGET DIRECTOR. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The attachment entitled "Fiscal Year 1991-92, Rates & Fees" shall be adopted as the official rates and fees for Sandridge Golf Club for the referenced fiscal year. 2. The rates and fees may be amended at any time by approval of the County Administrator and Budget Director, providing that the bond covenants contained in Resolution No. 85-78 are satisfied. These covenants require the County to keep fees and rates at a level to provide in each year's gross revenue sufficient funds to pay 100% of all operational and maintenance costs and all reserve and other payments required in the bond resolution. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bowman , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September Attest: Jeffrey K Barton, ClerkWA eo . 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By i r w .�4 V Richard N. Bird Chairman 68 w 0 0 GREENS FEE & CART RESIDENT WITH I.D. CARD nl�fiT SPECIALS GREENS FEE & CART RESIDENT WITH I.D. CARD PGA PASSPORT/FLAG CARD NOTE RESTRICTIONS: 1-WALKm*G & 9 HOLES GREENS FEE RESIDENT WITH I.D. CARD IYALKING & 9 HOLES RESTRICTIONS RATES AND FEES FOR 1991-1992 JAN. 1 THRU MAY 1 THRU OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER APRIL 30, 1992 SEPT. 30, 1992 18 HOLES 9 HOLES 18 HOLES 9 HOLES 18 HOLES 9 HOLES 18 HOLES 9 HOLES 18 HOLES 9 HOLES $18.50 $11.00 $16.00 $ 9.50 $19.50 $11.50 $17.00 $10.50 $23.00 $13.00 $20.50 $11.50 $29.00 $16.00 $ 25.00 $14.00 $14.50 N/A $17.50 N/A $21.00• N/A $25.00• N/A (AFTER 12:00 P.M.) $12.50' N/A $15.00' N/A $18.50' N/A $22.50' N/A $13.50' N/A $16.50' N/A $20.00' N/A N/A N/A 'DISCOUNT RATES APPLY ANYTIME DURING THE WEEK AND AFTER 12:00 NOON ON WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. $11.50 $ 6.50 $ 9.00 $ 5.00 WALKING AND 9 HOLE RATES ANYTIME DURING THE WEEK AND AFTER 12:00 NOON ON WEEKENDS & HOLIDAYS. 'DISCOUNT RATES APPLY ANYTIME DURING THE WEEK AND AFTER 12:00 NOON ON WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. $12.50 $ 7.00 $10.00 $ 5.50 WALKING AND 9 HOLE RATES ARE ONLY ALLOWED BEFORE 8:30 ON THE BACK 9 AND AFTER 1:00 P.M. 'DISCOUNT RATES APPLY AFTER 1:00 P.M. $15.00 $ 8.00 $12.50 $ 6.50 WALKING AND 9 HOLE RATES ARE ONLY ALLOWED BEFORE 8:30 ON THE BACK 9 AND AFTER 2:00 P.M. 'DISCOUNT RATES APPLY AFTER 1:00 P.M. IN APRIL & AFTER 2:00 P.M. IN JANUARY THRU MARCH. $19.00 $10.00 $15.00 $ 8.00 WALKING AND 9 HOLE RATES ARE ONLY ALLOWED BEFORE 8:30 ON THE BACK 9 AND AFTER 3:00 P.M. $18.50 $11.00 $16.00 $ 9.50 $14.50 N/A (AFTER 12:00 P.M.) $12.50' N/A $14.00' N/A 'DISCOUNT RATES APPLY A"IYT1ME DURING THE WEEK AND AFTER 12:00 NOON ON WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. $11.50 $ 6.50 $ 9.00 $ 5.00 WALKING AND 9 HOLE RATE5 ANYTIME DURING THE WEE: AND AFTER 12:00 NOON O: WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. PILO SHOP HOURS JAN. & FEB. 7:00 - 6:00 OF OPERATION 7:00 A.M. - 6:30 P.M. 7:00 A.M. - 5.30 P.M. 7:00 A.M. - 5:30 P.M. MAR. 8. APR. 7:00 - 6:30 7:00 A.M. - 6:30 P.M. DAYS THAT HOLIDAY RATES APPLY THANKSGIVING DAY MEMORIAL DAY INDEPENDENCE DAY LABOR DAY VETERANS DAY OTHER, SERVICE FEES 1991-1992 INDIAN RIVER CO. RESIDENT I.D. CARD - EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 - $25.00 RENTAL CLUBS - 18 HOLES - $10.00 - 9 HOLES - $7.50 HANDICAP SERVICE - $12.00 ANNUALLY - RESIDENT I.D. CARD HOLDER - $10.00 ANNUALLY DRIVING RANGE - $1.50 PER TOKEN - DRIVING RANGE CLUB - $22.50 (20 TICKETS) ALL FEES ARE SUBJECTMO 7% SALES TAX 1 rj 1 L � o o K 84 u. GE : 12 ADDED ITEM __AMENDMENT TO RATES,_ FEES,_ AND CHARGES_ FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF UTILI-TY SERVICES OMB Director Baird informed those present that the sewer base facility charge is being reduced by 75� to $12.15 per month and this applies for the base facility in which there are lines in front of an ERU and where capacity is reserved but lines are not available, the per ERU charge is to be reduced from $6.50 to $6.13. It was determined that no one wished to speak in this regard, and the Chairman closed the public hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Com- missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted Resolution 91-145 approving the above described amendments to the rates, fees and charges for the Department of Utility Services for fiscal year 1991/92. 70 RESOLUTION NO. 91- 145 A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES, WHICH WERE ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF ORDINANCE NO. 91-9. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 91-31 Indian River County adopted a Schedule of Rates, Fees, and Charges for certain connections to the County Utility system; and WHEREAS, the County deems it advisable to reduce certain of the charges for fiscal year 1991-92 by changing the "Sewer Base Facilities Charge Where Lines are Available - per ERU" charge from $13.00 to $12.25, and by reducing the "Sewer Base Facilities Charge Where Capacity is Reserved but Lines are not Available - per ERU" charge from $6.50 to $6.13; and WHEREAS, these reductions would be for fiscal year 1991-92 only, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. The foregoing recitals are adopted. 2. Attachment "A," entitled "Schedule of Water & Sewer Rates, Fees, and Charges 1991, 1992, and 1993" shall be amended pursuant to the foregoing adopted recitals, which changes are shown on the attached Exhibit "A" by interlineations and additions. i 3. The changes shall be effective October 1, 1991, for fiscal year 1991-92 only. 4. Excepi as changed by this resolution, the Schedule of Water & Sewer Rates, Fees, and Charges shall remain in effect. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Bowman , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Wheeler , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 11 day of September , 1991. Jef rey B rto�n, Jerk V i Attachment: E 'I.BIT ' ' �— . SEIP i i 1. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIV, R COUNTY,, FLORIDA By Richard N. Bird Chairman 71 PCj0K SEP Ji 19,1 BOOK 4PAGE , SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER RATES. FEES, AND CHARGES 1991, 1992. AND 1993 1991 1992 1993 RATES Water Billing Charge - Per Account $2.00 $2.00 $200 Base Facilities Charge Where Lines Are Available - Per ERU $6.20 $8.70 $9.20 Base Facilities Charge Where Capacity is Reserved But Lines Are Not Available - Per ERU $3.10 $4.35 $4.60 Volume Charge 0 to 3,000 Gallons Per Month Per ERU Except Irrigation Only - Per 1,000 Gallons Per Month _ $1.75 $1.75 $1.75 3,001 to 7,000 Gallons Per Month Per ERU and Irrigation Only 0 - 7,000 Gallons Per Month - Per 1,000 Gallons $2.15 $2.15 $2.15 Over 7,000 Gallons Per Month Per ERU - Per 1,000 Gallons $2.55 $2.55 $2.55 Excess Volume Surcharge For Use Greater than 13,000 Gallons Per Month Per ERU - Per 1,000 Gallons $1.95 $2.10 $230 Sewer Billing Charge - Per Account $2.00 $2.00 $200 Base Facilities Charge Where $12.25 Lines Are Available - Per ERU $7.60 44340 $13.50 Base Facilities Charge Where Capacity is Reserved But Lines $6.13 Are Not Available - Per ERU $3.80 36.80 $6.75 Hl Ell T J-tA' 11 ibt075/047.wk1 72 ADDED ITEM - RE ATTORNEY'S ATTENDANCE AT MEETING ON TRAIN HORNS Attorney Vitunac advised that he received a message today at 4:00 P.M. from the Federal DOT that there will be a meeting on Friday from 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. for all contestants of the train whistle problem to be heard, and he needs permission to participate as this will involve a trip to Miami Commissioner Scurlock talked about the possibility of combining presentations with Martin County, and Mr. Vitunac noted that you are limited to 5 minutes. He further noted that the Public Works Director has authorized the County Traffic Engineer to prepare a chart of all county train accidents to be presented. Board members indicated that Mr. Vitunac had permission to attend the meeting. Chairman Bird wished to thank Administrator Chandler and staff for all the work they did to make the Board's job a lot easier. There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 7:20 o'clock P.M. ATTEST: SEP Ii M1 73 M W%-XMQ0N--- 7 Chairman I