HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/15/1991BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1991
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1840 25TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Richard N. Bird, Chairman James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman
Margaret C. Bowman Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Carolyn K. Eggert
Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
* * * * * * * * * * *_* _ * * * * * * * * * * '* * .* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
9:00 A.M. 1. ; CALL TO ORDER
:INVOCATION - Richard Smith, Pastor
St. Marks Anglican Episcopal Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Administrator Chandler requested adding Item. 10-B regarding a
Space Needs Report to be scheduled for next week.
County Attorney Vitunac requested adding Item 12-A, additional
items to be discussed at the Legislative Delegation meeting.
5. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Adoption and Presentation of Proclamation
Designating Oct. 20-27, 1991 as Architecture
Awareness Week in Indian River County
B. Adoption and Presentation of Proclamation
Declaring Oct. 26, 1991 as Environmental
Learning Center Day in Indian River County
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of 9/10/91
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Resolutions adopted by the Board of Trustees of
the Indian River County Hospital District on
Sept. 19, 1991.
OCT 15 19fl
B. Copy of FY 1991 -92 -budget for the St. Johns
River Water Management District, adopted by the
Governing Board on 9/25/91.
C. Copy of the minutes of the quarterly meeting of
the Board of Supervisors of Sebastian River
Water Control District, held on Sept. 4, 1991.
Bonr
OCT 15 1991
BOOK 84 FALL c.J
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd) :
D. Report of Convictions, Month of Sept., 1991
E. Approval of Appointments
Sheriff Tim Dobeck:
Selby J. Strickland
Ed G. White
Cyril A. Knowles, Jr.
Michele A. Jackson
Ladell Von Young
Mark Velez
Shannon M. Pettey
Martha M. Turner
James P..Eisenhut
John W. Gault
Walter D. Gregg
John F. Hamilton, Jr.
Charles C. Kirby
Ella E. Hunt
Daniel F. Hatch, Jr.
John C. Hinton, Jr.
Glenn A. Hueneke~
Richard H. Hullen
James M. Keeler
Christopher J. Kiesel
Jarett M. Lang
Judy A. Locke
of Deputy Sheriff by
Gregory S. Long
Rafael A. Manotas
William G. Moore
Geo. M. Osborn
David T. Phillips
Howard J. Paulson
James W. Sheldon
Michael L. Pierce
Bennie F. Sutton
Steven E. Trapp
Louis A. Walakonis
Gregory A. Whitton
Velma Frazier
Leon Foster; Jr.
Theodore Floyd, Jr.
Betsy L. Farless
Carson W. Coakley
Craig A. Brown
Paul Aliano •
Thomas A. Beachum
James K. Ankney.
•
F. Proclamation Designating Oct. 6-12, 1991 as
Mental Illness Awareness Week
G. Golf Ball Retrieval Service Agreement
(memorandum dated Oct. 3, 1991)
H. Flag Discount Agreement
(memorandum dated Oct. 3, 1991)
I. Boiler and Machinery Insurance Renewal
(memorandum dated Oct. 7, 1991)
J. 1RC Bid #91-128/Automatic Doors for Main Lib.
(memorandum dated Sept. 25, 1991)
K. IRC Bid #92-26 / Catch Basins
(memorandum dated Oct. 3, 1991)
L. IRC Bid #92-25 / Straight Sand Endwalis
(memorandum dated Oct. 3, 1991)
M. IRC Bid #92-24 Curb and Gutter
(memorandum dated Oct. 3, 1991)
N. IRC Bid #92-23 / Sidewalks
(memorandum dated Oct. 3, 1991)
O. IRC Bid #91-131 / 1991-92 Grapefruit Crop
(memorandum dated Oct. 7, 1991)
P. IRC Bid #92-27 / Ready Mix Concrete
(memorandum dated Oct. 3, 1991)
Q. Award of Bid 91-122/Gifford Tower Refurbishment
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
R. Bid 91-120 / Park Place WWTP
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd) :
S. Rencorp's Request for PRD Approval Extension
for the Coquina PRD
(memorandum dated Oct. 8, 1991)
T. Renewal of Abandoned Flow Well Plugging
Agreement with SJRWMD
(memorandum dated Oct. 3, 1991)
U. Reduction of Easement: Frank S. Liggieri
Retained Easement from Sunshine Quality Homes
Unit 2 Plat Vacation
(memorandum dated October 7, 1991)
V. Request to schedule a public hearing date for
the Grand Harbor Marina Expansion Substantial
Deviation
(memorandum dated October 7, 1991)
W. Request for Road Closure - Wabasso Road and
Live Oak Drive, 7:30 am - 9:00 am, 10/26/91
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
X. Release of Utility Liens
(memorandum dated October 9, 1991)
. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 a.m. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
•
OCT 15 1991
ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, REGULATING THE WORK, CON-
STRUCTION, AND PERMITTED USE .IN
ALL COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY EASEMENT
OR OTHER PUBLIC LANDS IN THE UN-
INCORPORATED AREA OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA: PROVIDING FOR
TITLE, PURPOSE; APPLICABILITY;
DEFINITIONS; EXEMPTIONS FROM PER-
MITTING; PROHIBITED ACTIVITY;
RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE INFRACTION
PROCEDURES; PERMIT APPLICATION
PROCEDURES; REPAIR OF DAMAGE TO
COUNTY ROADS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY;
UNPERMITTED CONSTRUCTION; PERFOR-
MANCE SECURITY; PERMIT EXEMPTION;
TERMINATION OF USE OR REMOVAL OF
OBJECT; PUBLIC PROTECTION AND
LIABILITY; PENALTY; REPEAL OF CON-
FLICTING PROVISIONS; INCORPORATION
IN CODE; FEES; RIGHT-OF-WAY DRAW-
INGS; EFFECTIVE DATE; AND
SEVERABILITY
(memorandum dated Sept. 18, 1991)
13001(
OCT 151991
(100K 84 f)A6E
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
Proposed joint meeting with City of Sebastian
(memorandum dated October 7, 1991)
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
None
B. EMERGENCY SERVICES
Approval of Department of Emergency Services
Rules & Regulations Pertaining to the Fire and
Emergency Medical Service
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
(also under North, South, & West County Fire
Districts)
C. GENERAL SERVICES
None
D. LEISURE SERVICES
None
E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Kingslake Subdivision - Single Light
(memorandum dated October 9, 1991)
F. PERSONNEL
Health Benefit Program Contracts
(memorandum dated October 4, 1991)
G. PUBLIC WORKS
1. Fee Schedule & Fines for Enforcement of
Right -of -Way Ordinance
(memorandum dated October 1, 1991)
2. Right -of -Way Acquisition; 20th Ave.
Extension into Vero Beach Highlands
(memorandum dated September 26, 1991)
3. I.R. Blvd.. Ph. IV, Environmental Assess-
ment of Parcel III
(memorandum dated October 1, 1991)
4. Amendment to DNR FRDAP Agreement for
Treas. Shores Park - Phase I
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
5. So. Bch. Rec. Path Changes 8 Additions
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991).
6. Resolution Authorizing the Execution of
the FIND GRANT AGREEMENT for Round Island
Park Improvements
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
7. Request for Reimbursement of Costs for
Eastbound Right Turn Lane Along CR512 at
Chesser's Gap & Right -of -Way Purchase
(memorandum dated October 9, 1991)
•
OCT 151991
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd):
H. UTILITIES
1. Purchase of Property Contiguous to the So.
Co. R.O. Facility & Proposed So. Co. WWTP
(memorandum dated Sept. 17, 1991)
2. Water Main Replacement - Rockridge
(memorandum dated Sept. 19, 1991)
3. Petition for Water Service in the Meadows
S/D, 41st Court - North off 1st St., SW
(memorandum dated September 27, 1991)
4. .Reuse Service Area Ordinance (Rule 17-610,
F.A.C. Adoption)
(memorandum dated September 27, 1991)
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. CHAIRMAN RICHARD N. BIRD
1. Firearms Range Committee - Summary of
Actions
2. Parks & Recreation Committee - Summary
B. VICE CHAIRMAN GARY C. WHEELER
C. COMMISSIONER MARGARET C. BOWMAN
D. COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT
E. COMMISSIONER DON C. SCURLOCK, JR.
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS
A. NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Approval of Department of Emergency Services
Rules & Regulations Pertaining to the Fire and
Emergency Medical Service
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
B. SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Approval of Department of Emergency Services
Rules & Regulations Pertaining to the Fire and
Emergency Medical Service
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
BOOK
CT 15 1991
BOOK 84
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS (cont'd):
B1. WEST COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Approval of Department of Emergency Services
Rules & Regulations Pertaining to the Fire and
Emergency Medical Service
(memorandum dated October 8, 1991)
C. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
None
14a. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
Report on Civil Penalties Collected by the Environ-
mental Control Board, Fourth Quarter, 1990-91
(memorandum dated October .3, 1991)
15. ADJOURNMENT
alit
. ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE
AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED.
Tuesday, Octob=r 15, 1991
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian iver County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Co ission
Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, n Tuesday,
October 15, 1991, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present w re Richard N.
Bird, Chairman; Gary C. Wheeler, Vice Chairman; Margaret C.
Bowman; and Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
was on vacation. Also present were James E. Chandler, County
Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Patricia
Held, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order, and Commissioner
Scurlock led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Administrator Chandler requested the addition to today's
Agenda as Item 10-B of a discussion regarding the _cheduling on
the next Agenda of the consultants' report on the .pace Needs
Study.
County Attorney Vitunac requested the additio as Item 12-1
of comments to be brought before the Legislative D -legation.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECO DED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimou.ly (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) added he above items
to today's Agenda.
PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation - Architecture Awareness Week
Chairman Bird read aloud the following procla ation and
presented it to John Brenner, vice president of the Indian River
Chapter of the American Institute of Architects.
OCTL 15 1991
BOO
84 fAGE51C
OCT 15 1991
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING OCTOBER 20 - 27, 1991
AS ARCHITECTURE AWARENESS WEEK
IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
WHEREAS, the State
astounding rate each year
continuous stress upon
available; and
BOOK 84 F'Ai,E b j 7
of Florida continues to grow at an
and the influx of new residents puts a
the limited amount of real estate
WHEREAS, the creative use of space by our architects results
in the construction of residences •and buildings which will serve
the state for many years to come, and incorporates the most
up-to-date use of materials together with the most modern ideas
in future planning; and
WHEREAS, in addition to designing new buildings and space,
±•architects are serving an invaluable service to the state by
contributing their expertise in the area of urban renewal by
redesigning buildings and areas which have been in existence for
some time; and .
WHEREAS, the Indian River chapter of the American Institute
of Architects plans to commemorate the week of October 20
:October 27, 1991 as "Architecture Awareness Week";
•' • NOW, THEREFORE, be
Commissioners of Indian
October 20 - October 27,
.4.
it proclaimed by the Board of County
River County Florida. that theweek of
1991 be observed as
•
. ARCHITECTURE AWARENESS WEEK
in Indian River County, and the Board urges the citizens of
Indian River County to salute the county's architects for their
contributions to the continued growth and well-being of Florida.
Adopted this 15th day of October, 1991.
2
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
„ALge41-62
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
B. Proclamation - Environmental Learning Center Day
Chairman Bird read aloud the following proclamation and
presented it to Holly Dill, Bruce Barkett, and Roy Howard, who
thanked the Commissioners for their support of the Learning
Center.
PROCLAMATION
DECLARING OCTOBER 26, 1991 AS
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER DAY
IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
;:.` WHEREAS, the environmental quality of our community is one
of;our greatest assets; and
tv
WHEREAS, the Environmental Learning Center is an educational
:facility to be constructed on Wabasso Island to educte people
'(about our .natural resources in a factual setting with no
':political bias; and
WHEREAS, the land for the Environmental Learning
been cleared, construction plans finalized, permits obt
.,:;.the site prepared for the first phase of construction;
WHEREAS, during the month of October, and culmi
4 -October 26, 1991, the Environmental Learning Center wi
;:variety of events to heighten public participation
'`awareness about the Environmental Learning Center; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of In
,,,,,County recognizes that the quality of life in our co
,,,,,,County
dependent upon the quality of the environmental
our community;
.NOW, THEREFORE, in recognition of the significan
'mission of the Environmental Learning Center to enrich
''•life - in our community, it is hereby proclaimed by th
County Commissioners of Indian River County, that Oc
1991 be designated as
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER DAY
°in Indian River County, and the Board of County Co
urges all citizens to participate in the events sponsor
promoting the Enviroihmental Learning Center, and to
support the Environmental Learning Center and its w
endeavor.
Dated this 15th day of October, 1991.
OCT 151991
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
enter has
ined, and
nd
nating on
11 host a
nd public
ian River
unity is
etting of
e of the
ife - all
'Board of
ober 26,
issioners
d by and
therwise
rthwhile
SIONERS
LORIDA
Richard N. Bird. Chaff man
3
ROOK.
84
OCT 15 1999
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or
additions to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 10,
1991. There were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved
(4-0, Commissioner Eggert being absent) the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of 9/10/91, as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
Chairman Bird requested that Item W be removed from the
Consent Agenda for discussion.
A., B, C. and D
The following have been placed on file in the Office of the
Clerk to the Board:
Resolutions adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Indian
River County Hospital District on September 19, 1991
Copy of FY 1991-92 Budget for St. Johns River Water
Management District, adopted by the Governing Board on
9/25/91
Copy of the minutes of the quarterly meeting of the Board
of Supervisors of Sebastian River Water Control Board
District, held on Sept. 4, 1991.
Report of Convictions, Month of Sept., 1991
E. Approval of Appointments of Deputy Sheriff by Sheriff Tim
Dobeck
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
(4-0, Commissioner Eggert being absent) the following
appointments of Deputy Sheriff by Sheriff Tim Dobeck:
4
Approval of Appointments
Sheriff Tim Dobeck:
Selby J. Strickland
Ed G. White
Cyril A. Knowles, Jr.
Michele A. Jackson
Ladell Von Young
Mark Velez
Shannon M. Pettey
Martha M. Turner
James P..Eisenhut
John W. Gault
Walter D. Gregg
John F. Hamilton, Jr.
Charles C. Kirby
Ella E. Hunt
Daniel F. Hatch, Jr.
John C. Hinton, Jr.
Glenn A. Hueneke
Richard H. Hullen
James M. Keeler
Christopher J. Kiesel
Jarett M. Lang
Judy A. Locke
of Deputy Sheriff by
Gregory S. Long
Rafael A. Manotas
William C. Moore
Geo. M. Osborn
David T. Phillips
Howard J. Paulson
James W. Sheldon
Michael L. Pierce
Bennie F. Sutton
Steven E. Trapp
Louis A. Walakonis
Gregory A. Whitton
Velma Frazier
Leon Foster, Jr.
Theodore Floyd, Jr.
Betsy L. Farless
Carson W. Coakley
Craig A. Brown
Paul Aliano
Thomas A. Beachum
James K. Ankney
F. Proclamation Designating Mental Illness Awareness Week
PROCLAMATION
DESIGNATING OCTOBER 6-12, 1991
AS
MENTAL ILLNESS AWARENESS WEEK
WHEREAS, mental illness interferes with the vital
development and maturation of our state's most important resource
its people; and..
WHEREAS, mental illness affects roughly tens of thousands of
Floridians annually and costs our state millions of dollars each
year in lost productivity, social dependence and health care
costs; and
WHEREAS, mental illness is a grave concern and consequence
in our society and causes many people to fear this treatable
problem unnecessarily; and
'WHEREAS onl ..:
, y by understanding the problems and treatment of
',mental illness can our society ensure new and better prospects
'for recovery:
T i5 1991
5
BOOK 8 FAuE 5 D
OCT 15 199.1
BOOK
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, Indian River County, Florida that the week of
October 6-12, 1991 be observed as
MENTAL ILLNESS AWARENESS WEEK
in Indian River County, and the Board urges all citizens of
Indian River County to join in its observance.
Adopted this 3rd day of October, 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
G. Golf Ball Retrieval Service Agreement
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/91:
DATE:
.'TO: TO:
SUBJECT:
FROM:
OCTOBER 3, 1991
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
GOLF BALL .RETRIEVAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
:BOB KOMARINETZ ,.DIRECTOR OF GOLF
DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
=It is a normal practice for golf courses to contract out the golf
'•.ball retrieval service. .In the past three (3) years Sandridge
Golf Club has'.. contracted the services . of International Golf::!..of.,.
-Deerfield Beach.. t
Upon the execution of the 1990-91 agreement to Board of County
Commissioners requested that these services be bid the 'following
year through a formal biding process. In August Sandridge Golf
'Club requested Purchasing to bid out the Retrieval Services for
1991-92 Budget Year. Three (3) companies responded and the
highest bid was $5,040.00 by International Golf of Deerfield
Beach, Florida.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends thet approval of the agreement as specified in
the contract conditions.
6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved the
Contract for Ball Retrieval Services with International
Golf as set out in the above staff recommendation.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
H. Approval of Flag Discount Agreement - Sandridge Golf Club
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/91:
DATE: .00TOBER 3,1991
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: FLAG DISCOUNT AGREEMENT
FROM: fBOB BOMARINETE, DIRECTOR OF GOLF
=DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS
:Flag Golf Card is a discount. program offered to golf courses in
South Florida during the off season months of the year (May thru
November 30th). On December 11, 1990 the Board Approved .this
agreement which has been in operation this current year. Staff
.is again requesting that the Sandridge Golf Club be included in
the Flag Program for 1992.
;The Flag Discount
'this Budget Year.
RECOMMENDATION
Program
•
realizes over
$50,000.00 of. Revenues
Staff recommends the Approval of the Flag Discount Card Agreement
for 1992. •
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved the Flag
Discount Card Agreement, entitled "MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING" as recommended by staff.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD
7
OCT 15 1991
BOQKF''t4;E 54,4
OCT 151991
A� A
BOOK 4 ['ALE. �3
I. Boiler and Machinery Insurance Renewal
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/7/91:
TO:
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
THRU: Jack Price, Personnel Director
FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manage
DATE: f '7 October 1991
SUBJECT: Boiler and Machinery Insurance Renewal
Please consider this item for inclusion on the October 15, 1991,
Board consent agenda.
We have been advised by Hartford Steam Boiler & Inspection Co. that
they will renew the County's current boiler and machinery coverage
for $10,377.00, the same premium as paid in the previous year.
Staff recommends renewal of this coverage, with Schlitt Services
as the local agent.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved the renewal
of the County's current boiler and machinery coverage
for $10,377 with Hartford Steam Boiler & Inspection
Co., with Schlitt Services as the local agent, as
recommended by staff.
8
J. IRC Bid 91-128 - Automatic Doors for Main Library
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/25/91:
DATE:
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJ:
September 25, 1991
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi
Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
IRC Bid #91-128/Automatic Doors for
Building and Grounds
Main
Library/
:•BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Specifications mailed to:
Replies:
BID TAB
'Automatic Doors Mfg., Corp
'Sunrise, Florida
Stanley Magic Door
Lake Mary, F1
Automatic Entrances
Ft Lauderdale, F1
ESTIMATED BUDGET:
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Library
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the bid be awarded to Automatic Entrances, Inc.
as the most responsive and responsible bidder meeting specifica-
tions set forth in the Invitation to Bid. (See attached memo and
letter from Department).
September 4, 1991
Six (6) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
• LUMP SUM PRICE
.$ 5,500.00
$14,583.00
$15,370.00
$27,000.00
Construction In Progress
$15,370.00
v.
9
OCT 15 1991
BOOK 84 f'�i�E b2
OCT X15 1991
BOOK
FA.:t 575
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) awarded IRC Bid
91-128 to Automatic Entrances, Inc., as set out in the
above staff recommendation.
K. IRC Bid 92-26 - Catch Basins - Annual Bid
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/91:
DATE: October 3, 1991
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU:
James E. Chandler, County Admin. trator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Services
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
SUBJ: 92-26/Catch Basins
County Wide Annual Contracts
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date: September 18, 1991
Specifications mailed to: Four (4) Vendors
Replies: Three (3) Vendors
. BID TAB
`.Taylor Precast
::Deland, F1 '
Omalley Precast
Ft Pierce, F1
Standard Precast
Jacksonville, F1
,.•RECOMMENDATION:
UNIT PRICE
Inlet Type C - $360.00
Inlet Type P5- $394.00
Inlet Type C - $375.00
Inlet Type P5- $750.00
Inlet Type C - $645.00
Inlet Type P5- $867.00
Staff recommends the award of an Open End Contract to Taylor Precast
with an estimated value of $20,000.00 per .year. Also, authorize
the Purchasing Manager to renew the Contract subject to sat-
isfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance, and
the determination that renewal is in the best interest of the
County. The initial contract period shall begin on the date of
award.
1 0
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) awarded IRC Bid 92-26
as an Open End Contract to Taylor Precast with an
estimated value of $20,000 per year, as set out
in the above staff recommendation.
L. IRC Bid 92-25 - Straight Sand Endwalls - Annual Bid
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/91:
DATE: ; -, October 3, 1991
TO:
THRU:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
;James E. Chandler, County Administrator
.H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of. General Services
FROM: s':.`,Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
SUBJ: 1x:92-25/Straight Sand Endwalls
County Wide Annual Contracts
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Specifications mailed to:
Replies:
BID TAB
R & S Rip. Rap
:Vero Beach, F1
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the award of an Open End Contract to K&S Rip Rap
;.with an estimated 'value of $35,000.00 per year. Also, authorize
the Purchasing Manager to renew the Contract subject to sat-
isfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance,
and the determination that renewal is in the best interest of the
County. The initial contract period shall begin on the date of
award.
September 18, 1991
Three (3) Vendors
One (1) Vendor
UNIT PRICE
Please see attached Bid Form
OCT 151991
Poor
5'211'
OCT 15 1991
BOOK
c
o / F4LE J
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) awarded IRC Bid 92-25
as an Open End Contract to K&S Rip Rap with an
estimated value of $35,000 per year, as set out in the
above staff recommendation.
M. IRC Bid 92-24 - Curb and Gutter - Annual Bid
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/91:
DATE:
TO:
THRU:
SUBJ:
October 3, 1991
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi
Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager.
- G
92-24/Curb and Gutter
County Wide Annual Contracts
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid. Opening Date:
Specifications mailed to:
Replies:
BID TAB
PAVCO
Indiatlantic, F1
Fersch Construction
Vero Beach, F1
N RECOMMENDATION:
F.'
September 18, 1991
Three (3) Vendors
Two (2) Vendors
UNIT PRICE (Linear Foot)
Type F $ 6.70/LF
Type E - '$'6.70/LF
Drop Curb $ 6.70/LF
Type F - $13.00/LF
Type E - $11.00/LF
Drop Curb $10.50/LF
Staff recommends the award bf an Open End Contract. to Pavco Const.
with an estimated value of $20,000.00 per year. Also, -authorize
the Purchasing Manager to ..renew the Contract subject to sat-
, isfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance, and
the determination that renewal is in the best interest of the
County. The initial contract period shall begin on the date of
award.
12
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) awarded IRC Bid 92-24
as an Open End Contract to Pavco Const. with an
estimated value of $20,000 per year, as set out in the
above staff recommendation.
N. IRC Bid 92-23 - Sidewalks - Annual Bid
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/91:
DATE:
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
SUBJ: 92-23/Sidewalks
County Wide Annual Contracts
October 3, 1991
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servic
Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
•
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Specifications mailed to:
Replies:
BID TAB
PAVCO
Indiatlantic, Fl:
Drawdy Brothers
Ft Pierce, F1
Fersch Construction
Vero Beach, F1•
Hunley-Hubbard
Vero Beach, F1
September 18, 1991
Five (5) Vendors
Four (4) Vendors
UNIT PRICE (Yard)
4" Sidewalks - $11.75/yd
6" Sidewalks - $14.75/yd
4" Sidewalks - $15.75/yd
6" Sidewalks - $18.00/yd
4" Sidewalks - $17.10/yd
6" Sidewalks - $19.80/yd
4" Sidewalks - $17.35/yd
6" Sidewalks - $20.50/yd
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the award of an Open End Contract to Pavco Const.
with an estimated value of $20,000.00 per year. Also, authorize
the Purchasing Manager to renew the Contract subject to sat-
isfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance, and
the determination that renewal is in the best interest of the
County. The initial contract period shall begin on the date of
award.
OCT 15 1991
13
Bao t34, F f JL )
OCT 15 19F
BOOK
FACEr rCE F 1
a Z
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) awarded IRC Bid 92-23
as an Open End Contract to Pavco Const. with an
estimated value of $20,000 per year, as set out in the
above staff recommendation.
0. IRC Bid 91-131 - 1991-92 Grapefruit Crop - Dept. of Utilities
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/7/91:
DATE: October 7, 1991
'TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
SUBJ: Bid 91-131/1991-1992 Grapefruit Crop
P
Department of Utilities
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertisement Dates:
Replies:
September 29, 1991
September 11, 18, 1991
No Bids Received
F:ECOMMENDATION : .,
,,:Department of Utilities requests authorization to negotiate the
sale of the grapefruit crop for 1991-1992 as no bids were received.
See attached memo.
pry. . `.. . 1 � '�'.K' •_ , ...
ON. MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) authorized the Dept.
of Utilities to negotiate the sale of the grapefruit
crop for 1991-92 as no bids were received.
14
P. IRC Bid 92-27 - Ready Mix Concrete - Annual Bid
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/91:
DATE:
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
October 3, 1991
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi R
Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
1-
SUBJ: 92-27/Ready Mix Concrete
County Wide Annual Contracts
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Specifications mailed to:
Replies:
BID TAB
Rinker Materials
Vero Beach, Fl
,:Russell Concrete
Vero Beach, Fl
Tarmac
Melbourne, Fl
September 18, 1991
Three (3) Vendors
Three (3) Vendors
UNIT PRICE (Per Yard)
'2,500 p.s.i.
3,000 p.s.i.
4,000 p.s.i.
2,500 p.s.i.
3,000 p.s.i.
4,000 p.s.i.
2,500 p.s.i.
3,000 p.s.i.
4,000 p.s.i.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the award of an Open End Contract to Rinker -
with an estimated value of $25,000.00 per year. Also, authorize
the Purchasing Manager to renew the Contract subject to sat-
isfactory performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance,
and the determination that renewal is in the best interest of the
County. The initial contract period shall begin on the date of
award.
- $43.40/yd
- $44.90/yd
- $47.90/yd
- $43.90/yd
- $45.45/yd
- $47.90/yd
— $45.00/yd
- $46.00/yd
- $48.00/yd
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) awarded Bid 92-27 as
an Open End Contract to Rinker with an estimated value
of $25,000.
15
OCT 15 1991
OCT 15 199
BOOK
Q. Re -Award of Bid 91-122 - Gifford Tower Refurbishment
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/8/91:
7 L n 41..Y1.
DATE: October 8, 1991
iTO:_..;.
FROM:
SUBJ:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi
Fran Boynton, Purchasing. Manager
Reward of Bid 91-122
Gifford Tower Refurbishment
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On September 17, 1991, the Board of County. Commissioners approved
staff's recommendation to award the above referenced project to
Utility Service, with a project cost of $38,840.00. (See attached)
;When the contract documents were submitted to the contractor for
signature, they informed us that their bid form price of $38,840.00
did not include the cost of addendum #1. The County interpreted
the total amount bid as having included the cost of the addendum
as submitted by all the other contractors.
--.RECOMMENDATION:
The contractor Utility Services can not perform the.work without
the additional $10,939.00 cost of addendum #1.
Staff recommends the rejection of Utility Services bid and awarding
the bid to the next lowest bidder Hi -Line Contractors, of Orlando,
in the amount of $47,500.00.
;SOURCE OF FUNDS: Water Utilities Water Storage Tank Maintenance
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $72,000.00
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) rejected the bid by
Utility Services and re -awarded Bid 91-122 to the
next lowest bidder, Hi -Line Contractors, of Orlando, in
the amount of $47,500, as set out in the above staff
recommendation.
(CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD)
16
R. IRC Bid 91-120 - Park Place Wastewater Treatment Plant_
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/8/91:
DATE:
T0:
THRU:
October 8, 1991
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
'Department of General Servic
•
. FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager
'SUBJ: Bid 91-120/Park Place WWTP
Department of Utilities
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date:
Advertisement Dates:
Specifications Mailed to:
Replies:
?= VENDOR.
k,
Utility Management 7. $1,002.00
West Palm Beach, F1
August 28, 1991
August 7, 14, 1991
Eight (8) Vendors
Two (2) Vendors
Two (2) "Statements
BID TABULATION:
:. Allen's Environmental.: :...... $ 150.00
Longwood, F1
RECOMMENDATION:
of No Bid"
•
ti<
Staff recommends rejecting all bids and authorize the
of Utilities to negotiate the sale and removal of Park
Water Treatment Plant.
OCT 15 !99
Department
Place Waste
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) rejected all bids
and authorized the Dept. of Utilities to negotiate the
sale and removal of Park Place Waste Water Treatment
Plant, as set out in the above staff recommendation.
17
04,
•
BOOK
S. Rencorp's Request'for PRD Approval Extension for the
Coquina PRD
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/8/91:
J
TO:
{,THROUGH:
r:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
i
Obert - a ng, pi CP
Community Development Director
416
Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
John W. McCoy, AICP --t w�'1
Senior Planner, Current Development
October 8, 1991
Rencorp's Request for PRD Approval Extension for the
Coquina PRD
•
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
`meeting of October 15, 1991.
t, DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On July 12, 1990 the Planning and Zoning Commission granted
preliminary PRD plan approval to construct 64
units as phase I of
the Coquina development. The subject property is located
r immediately south of Sea Oaks and stretches from the Atlantic Ocean
r=to the Indian River. Approval was given subject to approval of the
Rspecial exception and conceptual plan by the Board of County
Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners subsequently
granted special exception and conceptual PRD plan approval on
August 21, 1990. Therefore, the effective date of preliminary PRD
plan approval is August 21, 1991; the approval will be deemed to
have expired on August 21, 1991, unless the Board grants an
;extension. By granting the preliminary PRD plan extension, the
;conceptual plan approval would also be extended.
The developer has requested that the preliminary PRD approval be
extended. Due to financial constraints, the developer has been
unable to commence construction. This project was reviewed under
the old land development regulations (LDRs) and the present
comprehensive plan requirements. Preliminary PRD plan extensions
are treated as site plans for the purpose of reviewing and granting
the extension. The applicant is requesting the full one year
extension. Pursuant to Section 23.2(g)(2) of the old LDRs, a
request for preliminary PRD plan extension was submitted prior to
the expiration date of the approved preliminary PRD plan. As
provided for in the old LDRs, the Board of County Commissioners may
act upon this request.
ANALYSIS:
Although this application was reviewed under the old LDRs, the
requirements of the adopted comprehensive plan were applied. The
only substantive County regulation changes which would affect this
project are the concurrency requirements. As of September 1, 1991
this application lost any concurrency vesting that the project had
18
obtained through the preliminary PRD approval process. If this
preliminary PRD approval extension is granted, the applicant will
need to obtain individual single family concurrency certificates
for each of the 64 proposed units as required in the applicable
regulations of Chapter 910 (Concurrency Management System) of the
new LDRs. Given this requirement, the application will
substantively conform to the new LDRs.
Pursuant to the applicable site plan ordinance regulations, the
Board of County Commissioners may grant, grant with additional
conditions or deny such preliminary PRD plan extensions. In the
staff's opinion the Coquina phase I preliminary PRD plan would
substantially conform to current requirements, subject to the
condition contained in this report's recommendation and the
original condition specified by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, staff recommends the Board of County
Commissioners grant the applicant's request for a 1 year
preliminary PRD plan extension subject to the original approval
conditions and the applicable Chapter 910 concurrency regulations.
The new expiration date of the phase I preliminary PRD plan is
August 21, 1992.
y i'f`s
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) granted a one-year
preliminary PRD plan extension for the Coquina PRD, as
set out in the above staff recommendation, with new
expiration date of August 21, 1992.
T. Renewal of Abandoned Flow Well Plugging Agreement with St.
Johns River Water Management District
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/3/91:
TO:
James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
‘Robert M. Reatin(, A
;.'Community Developmenirector
Roland DeBloisiA ICP
-.Chief, Environmental Planning
October 3, 1991
FROM:
DATE:
RE: Renewal of Abandoned Flow Well
Plugging Agreement with SJRWMD
It is requested that the data presented herein be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of October 15, 1991.
OCT 15 1991
19
000r
84 FAuE J34
OCT 15 199i
BOOK 8 4 PAGE 5 5
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On October .3, 1989, the county entered into a 50/50 cost share
program with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD)
to plug abandoned artesian wells on county utilities property. The
agreement was subsequently amended on March 26, 1990 to extend to
a county -wide program, with a county commitment to allocate a total
of $30,000 ($15,000 for utilities property, $15,000 for county -wide
.'private property) on a fiscal year basis. Under the program,
SJRWMD matches the county's funds with $30,000 of their own,
,;resulting is a total of $60,000 per fiscal year allocated for well
plugging.
.The agreement was renewed -by the Board of County Commissioners to
extend through fiscal year 1990-1991. This matter is now being
! brought to the Board for consideration to renew the contract
through fiscal year 1991-1992. .
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
The Board of County Commissioners has approved the allocation of
$15,000 in the Utilities Department budget and $15,000 in the
Community Development Department budget for fiscal year 1991-1992,
for the county/SJRWMD well plugging cost share program.
Abandoned flow wells result in the unnecessary consumption of
groundwater. Moreover, artesian flow wells tend to have high
chloride levels, and in turn lower water quality in the surficial
aquifer, which is commonly used for private potable wells. This
past fiscal year, + 3.5 million gallons per day (mgd) were saved by
the plugging of eleven (11) wells in the county -wide programand
two in the utility program.
RECOMMENDATION -
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners renew the
abandoned flow well plugging cost share agreement with the SJRWMD
for FY 1991-1992 and authorize the chairman to execute the attached
agreement.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved the renewal
of the abandoned flow well plugging cost share
agreement with SJRWMD for FY 91/92 and authorized the
Chairman's signature.
COPY OF PARTIALLY EXECUTED AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
20
U. Reduction of Easement - Frank S. Liggieri - Sunshine Quality
Homes - Unit 2 Plat Vacation
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/7/91:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
er . Keating
Community Develo
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Christopher D. Rison
Staff Planner, Current
irector
DATE: October 7, 1991
Development
SUBJECT: REDUCTION OF EASEMENT:
Frank S. Liggieri
Retained Easement from Sunshine Quality Homes -
Unit 2 Plat Vacation
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of October 15, 1991.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On March '6, 1990 the Board of County Commissioners adopted
Resolution No. 90-31 which effectively vacated the Plat of Sunshine
Quality Homes - Unit 2. The adopted resolution retained a drainage
and utility easement over the platted, and now vacated, road
rights-of-way until such time as the property was to be replatted
or site planned. Upon such approval, alternative drainage and
utility easement(s) over the property would then be approved by
resolution by the Board of County Commissioners. (Please see
'Attachment 1.)
On September 12, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved
a 4 - unit apartment building and parking as a major site plan on
the subject property. The approved site -plan is the first phase of
a larger project the owner intends to develop on the site at a
later time. Now that the site has received site plan approval, the
applicant and the county are now able to determine a workable,
alternate easement arrangement to accommodate both existing lines
and needed future service.
Peterson and Votapka, Inc. on behalf of Frank Liggieri, is now
requesting the original retained easement be reduced to twenty-five
(25) feet wide, as depicted on Attachment 2.
OCT 15 1991
21
BOQK 84 FAuE 5:3C
OCT 15 1991
BOO
84 PALE
1
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
The request has been reviewed by the County•Utilities Department
and the Public Works Department. Based upon their reviews,.there
would be no adverse impact to..drainage systems or to utilities
being supplied to the subject property since the reduced easement
has been designed to include and accommodate the existing utility
lines which cross the subject property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners, through
ti
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved staff's
recommendation and adopted Resolution 91-156, releasing
easements for drainage and utility retained by
Resolution No. 90-31, which vacated the plat of
Sunshine Quality Homes - Unit 2.
RESOLUTION NO. 91- 156
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, RELEASING EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE
AND UTILITY RETAINED BY RESOLUTION NO.
90-31, WHICH VACATED THE PLAT OF SUNSHINE
QUALITY HOMES - UNIT 2.
WHEREAS, Sunshine Quality Homes - Unit 2, according to the
plat thereof, recorded in Plat 5, Page 63, Public Records of Indian
River County, Florida, was vacated and returned to acreage on March
6, 1990, with the exception that drainage and utility easements were
retained over all rights -of -ways shown on the Plat of Sunshine Quality
Homes - Unit 2 until such time as the property was replatted or site
planned to provide alternate drainage and utility easements over the
property; and
22
WHEREAS, a site plan has been submitted over a portion of
the vacated acreage which provides alternate drainage and utility
easements over the property vacated,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1. All the above recitals are true and affirmed.
2. All easements for drainage and utilities retained by
Resolution No. 90-31 of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County with respect to the vacated Plat of Sunshine Quality
Homes - Unit 2, as recorded in O.R. Book 859, Page 1283, Public
Records of Indian River County, Florida, are hereby released, less and
except for those drainage and utility easements described on Exhibit
"A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
3. This release of drainage and utility easements shall
become effective upon filing of a certified copy of this resolution in the
Offices of the Clerk of the _Circuit Court, and the recording of this
resolution in the Public Records of Indian River County.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
S c u r l o c k and seconded by Commissioner Wheel e r , and, being put
to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye_
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler . Aye_
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye_
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Axe_.
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Absent
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 15 day of October
ATTEST:,::„.,
►t
L OCT 15 1991
, 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
B y : i�_.l! 74;e= Li
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
23
tIonK 64 F'4E i38
OCT 15 1991
EXHIBIT "A"
�`
ROOK ' FAE b:30
DRAINAGE AN UTILITY EASEMENT
Commence at a point lying 660 feet South and 389 feet West of the
NE1 of the NW- of the NE)/ of Section 12, Township 33 South, Range
39 East, it being the Northwest corner of Lot 6, Block A, Unit One
of Sunshine Quality Homes, according to Plat Book 5, Page 24 of the
Public Records of Indian River County, Florida,
S 0' 08' W, 89 feet to a point.
West, 7.00 feet to a point.
S 0. 08' W, 30 feet to a POINT OF BEGINNING.
S 0. 08' W, 25 feet to a point.
West, 528 feet to a point.
N 0' 08'.E, 25 feet to a point.
East, 528 feet to a POINT OF BEGINNING.
Lying in Indian River County, Florida.
S, 4�erstlies
C-l�ri9 I4F1.:5o,7
October 9, 1991 Prepared By:
EXHIBIT "B"
Then run
Then run
Then run
Then run
Then run
Then run
Then Run
4 Gi } e$c:d;#2,4ci! ( r'e.9L,l45l c1r-
Charles A. Cramer,
County Surveyor
Sunshine Quality Homes -Unit 2
Vacated Plat
45 q.• oo' 00' E 335.00'
P.L.S.
r
;O
8
••
o►oc• •.:.a
��v-r
To' DfA+.AG7 t ulurr EAS4►.Eoir 0
-� 15 • SrRa—r
0 - 10. Raw.
tl
‘V- ��y 'c a- s
ZS OAAu.iA .E t vTguly LASE►EI,►T .r . .
be getoitaxl..,
0
5
• 7e'
q
S 10' oooo' E. SzB.00'
24
EIMOIS
- Existing
Easement
-New
Easement
V. Request to schedule a public hearing date for the Grand
Harbor Marina Expansion Substantial Deviation
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/7/91:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
FROM:
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert M. Keat
Community Develo
•
Stan Boling,�AICP
Planning Director
Director
DATE: October 7, 1991
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR THE GRAND
HARBOR MARINA EXPANSION SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of October 15, 1991..
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
In September 1989, Grand Harbor applied to the Treasure Court
Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) for approval to amend the Grand
Harbor development order (D.O.). The requested amendment is to add
324 boatslips to the Grand Harbor marina which is currently
approved for 144 slips. If the request is approved, the result
would be a total of 468 slips in the marina. The addition of slips
is considered significant ..and, therefore, constitutes a
"substantial deviation" from the approved development plans and
D.O. ,.
•
A substantial deviation request is reviewed and processed in much
the same way as the original D.R.I. project (see attachment #1).
The delay in the review and consideration of this substantial
deviation application has been at the request of the developer.
During 1990 and the early part of 1991, the developer requested the
ability to delay and extend the substantial deviation application;
the requests to extend the application were granted by the TCRPC
with no objections from county staff. The developer requested the
application extensions due to the ownership charges and uncertainly
of direction of the Grand Harbor project.
The substantial deviation request has now undergone a review for
informational and analysis content (known as the "sufficiency
review") by the TCRPC staff with input from county staff and state
and federal agencies. To date, the TCRPC staff has been
responsible for coordinating the review process. The TCRPC staff
has now officially certified that the request application is
sufficient for consideration and action (see attachment #2).
Pursuant to Florida Statutes 380.06(11), the Board of County
Commissioners is now required to schedule a public hearing date at
which the Board, after receiving a report and recommendation from
the TCRPC, will consider approving the request and amending the
development order (D.O.).
In addition to normal scheduling requirements, it should be noted
that the applicant is requesting a May,1992 hearing date to allow
more time to try to address a major environmental concern expressed
by the TCRPC staff. (see attachment #3).
OCT 15 1991
25 MOKt 84 PALE 540
Pr -
OCT 5
BOOK 84 PArE
ANALYSIS:
The Board has several factors to consider in setting a hearing
date. These factors are as follows:
1. the date must accommodate the legal requirement to advertise
the hearing date at least 60 days in advance of the hearing;
2. the date must allow time for the TCRPC to consider the request
and forward its recommendation and report to the county; and
3..- the date should accommodate the applicant's request to "hold -
off" the public hearing for several months (see attachment
#3).
Although the applicant's request to hold -off the*county's public
hearing until May 1992 is unusual, staff has no objections to such
scheduling. County staff's analysis shows that scheduling the
public hearing for the May 5, 1992 Board of County Commissioners
regular meeting will allow sufficient time for advertising and
meeting State requirements, will allow sufficient time for county
staff review of the TCRPC report and recommendation, and will
accommodate the applicant's request for an extensive period of time
to work with the TCRPC staff.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners direct
staff to set a public hearing date of May 5, 1992 for consideration
of the Grand Harbor marina expansion substantial deviation request.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) directed staff to
set a public hearing date of May 5, 1992 for
consideration of the Grand Harbor marina expansion
substantial deviation request.
26
1
W. Request for Road Closure - Wabasso Road and Live Oak Drive -
"Wabasso Bridge 5 K Run"
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/8/91:
•
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
Michael S. Dudeck, Jr.,
.County Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for Road Closure
Wabasso Road and Live Oak Drive,
7:30 AM - 9:00 AM; October 26, 1991
DATE: October 8, 1991 FILE: elcrace.agn
'DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
'The Environmental Learning Center is proposing to conduct
;pits First Annual ,"Wabasso Bridge 5 K Run" at 8:00 AM .on
;Saturday, October 26, 1991. The 3.1 mile run will start and
end at the Environmental Learning Center on Live Oak Drive
"and will utilize CR510, the high bridge, and an additional-
-'segment of CR510 west of SR A1A. It is anticipated that
between 100 and 200 runners of all ages will participate in
this race which is projected to consume approximately 45
(minutes
Since the race'. participants,can virtually include persons
from "8 thru 80". and the race course will involve the
participants running both eastbound and westbound on CR510,
:the County 'Traffic._ 'Engineer, •.representatives of. the
Sheriff's .Department `::-along ,.with Randy Dowling have
determined that, :... for safety reasons, this section. of
roadway should be. closed to all vehicular traffic from 8:00
'AM to 9:00 AM for the race.'
y7 ... e `si}},.1✓�r,Ki..v t'.i.L 4.� �. A ,`` rr yd a INd.�./+.l�r„1r ..'.rv. (♦N.r's
;Sheriff Deputies .will be on duty.at'both the°easterly and
westerly portions of the roadway closure as will the County
.Traffic Engineering staff, maintaining temporary barricades
for the event. -
In
vent.
In addition, Vero Beach High School ROTC cadets in uniform,
will be utilized to restrict any and_all traffic attempting
to enter CR510 via the few side streets involved.
The Environmental Learning Center will have emergency and
support vehicles along the route to assist any person or
persons who cannot complete the run within one hour and a
refreshment stand will be available to assist as well.
At 7:30 AM a "1 mile fun run/walk" will take place solely on
Live Oak Drive. This short event will be over well before
the 8:00 AM start time for the main run.
The formal request for the road closures along with other
correspondence and the Environmental Learning Center's
co-insurance affidavits are attached to this request.
OCT 15 99
27 BOOK 84 P4E J42
•.
OCT i991 EOOK 84 FAL b43
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Upon receiving the initial request for road closure, Traffic
Engineering and Sheriff Department staff considered
maintaining one lane of traffic during the event.
This alternative was discarded because of the great range -
of ages of the participants and the fact that all
participants will be required to run both eastbound and
westbound on the section of roadway involved.
'RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Given the benefits which will accrue to the general public
from this Environmental Learning Center event, the very
'limited time period involved, and the minimal inconvenience
to the general motoring public,' staff recommends that the
segment of. CR510. from Live Oak Drive, easterly to
;approximately 100`..yards west of SRA1A be closed from the
''8:00 AM to 9:00 AM. along with a closure of Live Oak Drive
,from the Environmental Learning Center northerly to CR510,
'from 7:30 AM to 9:00 AM.
Chairman Bird explained that he requested this item to be
removed from the Consent Agenda because he is concerned about
closing the roadway across the river when the alternative bridges
are so far away. He hoped there would be some way to keep one
lane open for traffic.
Public Works Director Jim Davis felt the impact is lessened
because the run is scheduled for early Saturday morning and
probably will not last even an hour; probably more like 30 to 45
minutes. There is a steep crown to the bridge with a short
horizontal sight distance, and we did not want motorists not
being able to see the runners who will be participating in the
event. The runners will start at the site of the Environmental
Learning Center and go across the bridge and return, which would
make it very difficult to keep one lane open for vehicle traffic.
Mr. Davis felt the slight inconvenience to motorists is
outweighed by the safety factor for the runners.
Considering all the factors involved, Commissioner Wheeler
felt the temporary closing of the roadway was the proper thing to
do.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) authorized the
temporary closing of a segment of CR -510 and Live Oak
Drive as specified in the above staff recommendation.
28
X. Release of Utility Liens
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 10/9/91:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office
DATE: October 9, 1991
RE: CONSENT AGENDA - B.C.C. MEETING 10/15/91
RELEASE OF UTILITY LIENS
•
I have prepared the following lien -related documents and request that
the Boardauthorize the Chairman to sign them:
1. Satisfaction of Impact Fee Extension Lien
in the name of:
CHICOINE
Releases of Special Assessment Liens from
CITRUS GARDENS PROJECT in the names of:
PULEO
HIGINSON
LAGAMBA
RICHARDSON
FONTANA
BROOM
LOVRETIN
EWEN
' DUFFY
r COCHRAN
s RICHARDSON
MARCLAY
CROSBY
CORUM
RENTON
BARRIE
STOUGH (2)
BOND
MANWARING
DOPF (DOPE)
Release of Special Assessment Lien from
U.S. #1 (10TH TO 4TH STREET) -in the
NPC LEASING CORP.
FOWLER
MacMILLAN
JOHNSON
CT 15 199'E
•
name of:
4. Release of Special Assessment Lien from
STATE ROAD 60 SEWER PROJECT in the name of:
COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH (Map #41) Lot 100
5. Releases of Special Assessment Liens from
12th STREET PROJECT in the names of:
NASON
STEWART •
29
Orly /�__-i; [p
EEUOK �FA.,E Jz1
OCT 16 199i
300K 84 F:':,;E 545
6. Releases of Special Assessment Liens from
SUMMERPLACE PROJECT in the names of:
McDONALD
WILSON
McCOY
ROSE
7. Release of Special Assessment Lien for
ANGLERS COVE PROJECT in the name of:
CLARK
8. Release of Special Assessment Lien from
A -1-A (North Beaches) PROJECT in the name of:
CUNNINGHAM
ON MOTION by
Commissioner
Commissioner
above listed
by staff.
•
Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Eggert being absent) approved the
release of utility liens, as recommended
COPIES OF RELEASES OF LIEN ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD
30
PUBLIC HEARING
ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, REGULATING THE WORK,
CONSTRUCTION, AND PERMITTED USE IN ALL COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY, ETC.
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A. M. having passed, the Deputy Clerk
read the following Notice with Proof of Publication attached, to
wit:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a /F �7r,t(i
!l
in the matter of (/ zieeU4‘
2.
v
in the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
6 /997
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida. each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach. in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.(''9
Swom to and subscribed before me this �v day of
!1s 9/
•
1�
,,,C;.; Manager)
(clerk of the -Circuit Court; Indian River County, Flbrlda) ' - -
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
AND RESCHEDULING OF PREVIOUSLY
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian
River County, Florida, hereby provides notice of
CANCELLATIN of a previously advertised Public
Hearing, which was scheduled for 9:05 a.m. on
Tuesday, October 8, 1991, to discuss the following
proposed ordinance entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUN-
TY, FLORIDA, REGULATING THE WORK,
' CONSTRUCTION. AND PERMITTED USE
IN ALL COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY EASE-
MENT OR OTHER PUBUC LANDS IN THE
UNINCORPORATED AREA OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA: PROVIDING
FOR TITLE, PURPOSE; APPUCABIUTY;
DEFINITIONS; EXEMPTIONS FROM PER-
• MITTING; PROHIBITED ACTIVITY; RIGHT,
OF -WAY ORDINANCE INFRACTION
PROCEDURES; PERMIT APPUCATION
PROCEDURES; REPAIR OF DAMAGE TO
, COUNTY ROADS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY;
UNPERMITTED CONSTRUCTION; PER-
FORMANCE SECURITY; PERMIT EXEMP-
TION; TERMINATION OF USE OR RE,
MOVAL OF OBJECT; PUBLIC PROTEC-
TION AND LIABILITY; PENALTY; REPEAL
• OF CONFUCTING PROVISIONS; INCOR-
PORATION IN CODE; FEES; RIGHT-OF-
WAY DRAWINGS; EFFECTIVE . DATE;
AND SEVERABILITY.
This Public Hearing has been RESCHEDULED for
9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, October 15, 1991.
Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which
may be made at the Public Hearing on October 15,
1991, will need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which Includes testimony
Sept.a2d, nce 991 which the appeal is based.
f 835290
The Board reviewed memo from Assistant County Attorney Terry
O'Brien dated September 18, 1991:
►•.TO: ;.'+ Board of County Commissioners
.,FROM: . al l Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney )d
DATE: i September 18, 1991
' RE: RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - 10/n/91
•
'Several meetings ago the subject ordinance was before the Board for
approval of a public hearing date. At that time the Board referred the
matter to the Professional Services Advisory Committee for comments.
The Committee's comments have been received and reviewed by staff. '
The proposed ordinance has been revised to conform to those comments.
31
OCT 15 199
BOOK
Jt
OCT 15 X991
ROOK
Public Works Director James Davis reported that County
Engineers Roger Cain and Bill Meager have been working on this very
comprehensive ordinance which basically establishes a permitting
procedure for any work in County rights-of-way or easements or
County -owned land, but particularly the emphasis is on County
rights-of-way and easements. The ordinance has been before the
Professional Services Advisory Committee and their constructive
comments have been incorporated, and staff felt it is ready to come
before the Board for approval. This ordinance actually formalizes
the procedure and requirements that have been required in the past
and now will be made a part of our County Code.
Commissioner Wheeler asked how enforcement of the ordinance
would be handled because he felt some of the violations could take
place in just an hour or two.
Director Davis explained that most of the enforcement work and
monitor work will be done by two inspectors in the field,
supervised by Bill Meager and aided by staff in the engineering
department.
Commissioner Wheeler asked whether the fines and penalties
would be handled by issuing a summons to appear.
Commissioner Scurlock asked whether we could cite the property
owner rather than the vehicle owner.
Director Davis responded that it would depend on the activity.
Commissioner Scurlock was concerned that if we have strict
interpretation and enforcement, neighbor could use it against
neighbor.
Commissioner Wheeler was concerned with legitimate violations,
where parking in the right-of-way destroys the grass and obstructs
the view for traffic. He felt we have had difficulty in issuing
summonses for those violations, and he asked the County attorney
about the status of the statute.
County Attorney Vitunac responded that the state law is
available now, wherein if a violation happens so fast we cannot get
them administratively, we can go to the state attorney.
Commissioner Wheeler asked whether our code enforcement
officers currently have the ability to issue summonses.
Assistant County Attorney O'Brien responded that Environmental
Planning Chief Roland DeBlois is working to give code enforcement
officers that authority/ and once this ordinance is in place the
sheriff will be able to issue citations for violations. In the
past the sheriff has not issued citations because in their view we
had no ordinance authorizing them to do so.
Director Davis directed the Board to page 7 of the ordinance
which addresses that issue.
32
Commissioner Wheeler stressed the need to coordinate the
ordinance with the state statute in order to authorize our code
enforcement officers to issue summonses for violations of the code.
County Administrator Chandler commented that within any
process of law enforcement or code enforcement, the discretion and
judgment of the enforcement officer can cure a problem with a
simple warning.
County Attorney Vitunac clarified it would be more a police
function than a code function because the right-of-way itself is
not private property. The illegal use of public property would be
a violation of a county ordinance; enforcement would be primarily
the sheriff's function.
Public Works Director Davis reported working with various
enforcement individuals on a day-to-day basis and staff has found
that certain activities, for example, right-of-way use permit,
construction or other activity in the right-of-way, placement of
structures or objects, would require enforcement and monitoring by
engineering inspectors because they know where the right-of-way
limits are located and can determine whether a particular activity
is detrimental to the right-of-way. In cases where it is a matter
of regulatory signage, such as "no parking" areas, those would be
enforced by law enforcement officers and tickets issued where
applicable.
Chairman Bird directed the discussion to page 9 of the
ordinance, paragraph 3(e), regarding marginal access roads and
other local roads, and felt the phrase "may require driveway
relocation" could cause some problem.
Director Davis explained that this requirement would come into
play only when we are having safety problems, where a congested
area is a hazard to the general public. It is not to require
people to relocate driveways simply because we do not have a major
marginal access road network; but in the future, as the County
traffic grows on the road systems, it may be something that we may
want to exercise.
Chairman Bird wished to clarify that, even though there is an
existing business which has a secondary road, they would not be
forced to close their original access, unless there develops a real
safety problem, and Director Davis said that is the intent.
Commissioner Bowman pointed out on page 9, paragraph (b), 12th
line down, it says, "The Public Works Director may ask the mitered
ends or endwalls on local roads or residential use roads." She
suggested the word "question" or "request" in place of "ask," and
Director Davis agreed it should read "may require."
Commissioner Bowman asked for clarification on the term
33
OCT 15 1991 _.
BOOK 4 PA6E
cj
OCT i5 1991
BOOK
FALE 51Q)
"stationing" as found on page 10, paragraph B(1).
Director Davis explained that "stationing" is an engineering
term for a 100 -foot interval and is used as a reference for
indicating a particular location. It is a term that engineers and
surveyors use frequently.
Community Development Director Keating emphasized we are
approaching the citation ordinance very carefully because, if a
respondent contests a citation, it would be in a court situation
and we want tight rules andinternal procedures. Once we go
through the long and cumbersome process of getting an order against
someone, if there is a subsequent violation, then that person can
automatically be fined. It is called a continuing order and it is
provided for in state law. So we do have a lot of advantages and
we are still working on the citation ordinance.
Commissioner Wheeler felt the citation ordinance will
streamline the system with the minor, irritating violations,
particularly with illegal parking and so forth.
Community Development Director Keating thought illegal parking
would be one of the citation -related violations whereas others,
like junk, trash, debris, would be less inclined to be handled
through a citation ordinance.
Commissioner Wheeler wanted to see the process move along and
have the ordinance become effective rapidly.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Fred Mensing from Roseland came before the Board and
questioned the $10,000 bond requirement for truck traffic when the
State already issues permits. He felt it could cause great
inconvenience for truckers.
Public Works Director Davis explained that the state permits
cover the state roadways, not the county rights-of-way, and the
bond is necessary to cover potential damage caused by oversize,
overdimension vehicles.
Mr. Mensing stated that a driver coming down from somewhere
like Georgia has a permit to get to I-95 and CR512; the County is
going to have to put into place some mechanism to, in a timely
fashion, get a permit for that driver.
Chairman Bird assured Mr. Mensing that we will work out the
mechanics to expedite the process.
Mr. Mensing's next question concerned prohibited activities
and directed the Board's attention to paragraph 1(e) on page 6,
which reads, "provide for the direct connection of any fluid
discharge from a swimming pool," and 1(j) on page 7 which reads,
"install any water well or septic system within the County right -
34
of -way without license and pursuant to Resolution 90-75." Mr.
Mensing asked how we would handle the ones that are now in place.
Mr. Davis explained the reason for including that as a
prohibited activity is primarily due to maintenance of County
drainage systems as well as the ability of those systems to retain
and detain storm water, which is their primary design function.
The problem we have many times is swimming pools and water
softeners discharging into the drainage systems. This activity
keeps the drainage systems wet so that maintenance crews cannot
come in with equipment and mow them. We get repeated requests for
mowing back lot ditches, front yard swales and all that kind of
thing, and it is very difficult for maintenance crews to maintain
those ditches when there is a foot of water in them throughout the
year.
Commissioner Scurlock asked about the fluid discharge systems
that are already in place.
Director Davis said if they are in the right-of-way and they
are not supposed to be there and they are causing a problem, then
they may have to be removed. On County right-of-way which is
dedicated to the public for the benefit of the public, private
systems, unless they are under a franchise or some approved
mechanism, simply should not encumber that right-of-way or
easement. The enforcement procedure comes into play when we have
a problem.
Mr. Mensing addressed paragraph 2(d) on page 7, allowing
parking on a County right-of-way for 48 continuous hours and asked
why it was not limited to 24 hours.
Director Davis responded that we do not want to encourage
people to park abandoned vehicles in the right-of-way. The 48
hours took into consideration parking a vehicle on the shoulder of
the road over a weekend. After calling and asking other cities and
counties in the state, 48 hours seemed to be the time frame they
used. So it was simply a judgment call.
Mr. Mensing said his other questions had been addressed and
thanked the Board.
Edmund Cannon, 295 16th Avenue, described his neighborhood as
an extension of Indianapolis Speedway. His concern was with the
residential neighborhoods where maintenance crews and lawn care
crews park their vehicles and trailers in the roadway, blocking
traffic and creating hazardous conditions, particularly at corners.
He also mentioned this type of activity blocks access to mailboxes
which interferes with the delivery of mail. Mr. Cannon asked that
this ordinance be passed primarily from the standpoint of safety.
35
OCT i5 1991
(poor
E550
CT 15 199'
BOOK
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) adopted Ordinance
91-44 regulating the work, construction and
permitted use in all county rights-of-way, easements
or other public lands in the unincorporated areas.
ORDINANCE NO. 91- 4_4_
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
REGULATING THE WORK, CONSTRUCTION, AND PERMIT-
TED USE IN ALL COUNTY RIGHTS-OF-WAY EASEMENT
OR OTHER PUBLIC LANDS IN THE: UNINCOPORATED
AREA OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,. FLORIDA: PRO-
VIDING FOR TITLE, PURPOSE; .APPLICABILITY;
DEFINITIONS; EXEMPTIONS FROM PERMITTING;
PROHIBITED ACTIVITY; RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE
INFRACTION PROCEDURES; PERMIT APPLICATION
PROCEDURES; REPAIR OF DAMAGE TO COUNTY ROADS
OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY; UNPERMITTED CONSTRUCTION;
PERFORMANCE SECURITY; PERMIT EXEMPTION;
TERMINATION OF USE OR REMOVAL OF OBJECT;
PUBLIC PROTECTION AND LIABILITY; PENALTY;
REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; INCORPORTION
IN. CODE; FEES; RIGHT-OF-WAY DRAWINGS; EFFEC-
TIVE DATE; AND SEVERABILITY.
Fhi1J.E._,
WHEREAS, orderly administration and safety dictate
that the County regulate the use of County Rights-of-way,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that:
SECTION 1. NEW CHAPTER.
Chapter 310 - Rights-of-way as set forth in Attachment
"A" to this Ordinance is hereby adopted.
SECTION 2. REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
All previous ordinances, resolutions, or motions of the
Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida
which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict. All special acts of the
legislature applying only to the unincorporated portion of Indian
River County and which conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
36
.SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, or if any sentence, paragraph,
phrase, or word of !this ordinance is for any reason held to
be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding
shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance,
and it shall be construed to have been the legislative
intent to pass the ordinance without such unconstitutional,
invalid or inoperative part.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall become effective upon
becoming law.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 15
day of _ October , 1991.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero. Beach
Press -Journal on the 25_ day ofptPmhPr . 1.991, for a
public hearing to be held on the is day of October
1991, at which time it was moved for adoption by
Commissioner ScuXlock seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler
, and adopted by the following vote:
Chairman Richard N. Bird
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye _
Aye
Aye
Aye_
Absent
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By -'�ll�4112-
ic and '. 13Tr , airman
ORDINANCE 91-44 IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH ATTACHMENT "A" IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
37
OCT 15 '99•
ROo
4 AGE
r•OCT 15 1991
BOOK
PALE Jjj
PROPOSED JOINT MEETING WITH CITY OF SEBASTIAN
The Board reviewed memo from County Administrator James
Chandler dated October 7, 1991:
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: October 7, 1991 FILE:
l
James E. CF"iandler
FRgMI:County Administrator
JOINT MEETING WITH
SUBJECT: CITY OF SEBASTIAN
REFERENCES:
The Commission, at the meeting of September 17, 1991, proposed a meeting in
mid-November with the City of Sebastian to consider the CR512 project. •
.In response, the City has suggested the afternoon of Tuesday, November 26th.
Administrator Chandler noted November 26 is a Tuesday, which
would be a Regular Meeting day for the Board of County
Commissioners, and he would arrange the agenda to make it possible
to begin a meeting with the City at 2:00 p.m. on that day.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved a joint
meeting with the City of Sebastian City Council on
Tuesday, November 26, 1991, with the starting time
to be arranged by the County Administrator.
SPACE NEEDS STUDY
Administrator Chandler advised the Board that he would like to
schedule the presentation of the Space Needs Study at next week's
meeting and because it will be a rather lengthy item he would like
to schedule it as the last item on the agenda. He clarified that
this space needs study covers all the space needs of the County
rather than just the courthouse.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved
scheduling the Space Needs Study presentation as the
final item on next week's agenda.
38
APPROVAL OF DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES RULES AND REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO THE FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE
The Board reviewed memo from Emergency Services Director Doug
Wright dated October 8, 1991:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
•
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Board of Fire Commissioners
South County Fire District
Board of Fire Commissioners
North County Fire District
Board of Fire Commissioners
West County Fire District
James Chandler
County AdmListrator
Doug Wright, Director
Emergency Services
October 8, 1991 "
Approval of Department of Emergency Services Rules and
Regulations Pertaining to the Fire and Emergency Medical
Service
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be
given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners and
the Board of Fire Commissioners for the North, South, and West County
,Fire Districts, respectively, at the next regular scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS .,.
On July 13, 1990, the Ad Hoc Committee which was appointed by the
•Board of County Commissioners to study and recommend a process and
method for consolidation of emergency services in Indian River
County, approved a Six Year Emergency Services Equalization Plan and
recommended it to the Board of County Commissioners.
The •Board of County Commissioners approved the fourteen (14)
recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee on July 24, 1990. Initially,
staff completed a proposed comprehensive master plan to consolidate„
and unify emergency services in the County. However, the master plan
required modification after the. Town of Indian River Shores decided
not to participate in the consolidation process. This resulted in
revising the financial data portion of the plan which was presented
to the public and overwhelmingly approved in a referendum which was
held on March 12, 1991.
One of the fourteen recommendations which was approved by the Ad Hoc
Committee and the Board related to standardized rules and regulations
whereby all fire and EMS staff would operate under a single set of
directives. .Staff has, been working with the Fire and EMS Divisions
as well as union representatives in finalizing the rules and
regulations noui before the Board for consideration.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The main thrust of the recommendation by the Ad Hoc Committee for
standardized rules and regulations is related to the fact that
personnel working in the same stations, on the same vehicles, within
the same Department, should work under similar rules and regulations.
That was the predicate under which the concept of standardization for
emergency services was proposed and approved prior by the Board of
County Commissioners.
39
15 199
Dor ;� a,
OCT r 5 199
BOOK 84 FACE
For the most part, the revised rules and regulations required only
organization name changes for the fire division and the addition of
articles relating to the inclusion of the EMS division into the
directives. There were also some changes required to comply with the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and minor revisions to comply with
other state and federal laws.
Salary and fringe benefits provided by contract to bargaining unit
members are not conveyed to non -contract employees by virtue of
approval of these rules and regulations by the Board. Those areas of
the rules and regulations have been identified and clarified as to
what is available to contract and non -contract employees,
respectively.
The EMS staff have gained in terms of benefit which was not
previously afforded to them or any other county employee. The new
benefit is in Article 9.08 relating to special consideration for
prudent use of medical leave. The benefit is a $50.00 savings bond
and one additional day off (birthday) in the next calendar year for
those full-time permanent employees using three (3) days or less
medical leave during the year.
Staff asserts the additional benefit provided to the EMS personnel is
favorable to management in that any reduction in the amount of
medical leave used reduces the amount of overtime which has to be
paid. A $50.00 savings bond is far less than paying one shift of
overtime and staff recommends approval of this additional benefit.
Staff has sufficient funds in the budget for the current fiscal year
to provide this benefit which is estimated to cost less than $5,000.
This amount is reduced further when compared to the potential for
expense related to overtime pay rates.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Department of Emergency Services
Rules and Regulations which includes the job descriptions for the
fire and EMS divisions with an effective date of November 1, 1991.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved the
Department of Emergency Services Rules and
Regulations which will be effective November 1,
1991.
Chairman Bird asked about the status of the volunteer corp in
the North County.
Emergency Services Director Doug Wright reported that we
continue to fund those four volunteer departments in the North
County. He said his department has shared and involved them in
these rules and regulations. He reported that there has been a
reduction in the number of responses to callouts. Without
mentioning the specific department, he stated that last month they
had an estimated 14 callouts and zero responses, which concerns
him. He said they try to meet with the individual departments but
continue to have problems because only four or five people show up
for the meetings and it is difficult to generate interest on that
40
basis. He said his staff have not intentionally taken any action
to discourage anyone from volunteering and because of the liability
and other things, along with the standards in terms of health and
emergency vehicle driver certification, we still continue to send
them to school free of charge.
Chairman Bird thought there was a feeling that the additional
requirements created additional problems for recruiting. He
realized that it goes with the changing times, and some of the
requirements are from state and federal regulations, but he wanted
to be sure we are doing all we can to expedite or simplify the
certification process.
Commissioner Wheeler noted that we cannot allow volunteers to
work in emergency situations without proper training because it is
not fair to the people we are servicing and it is a tremendous
liability.
Commissioner Scurlock mentioned, and everyone agreed, that
some volunteers can handle the activities that do not require the
training needed for front-line activities.
Chairman Bird asked if there is a difference between a
volunteer in the South County fire district and the North County
fire district. It seems that young people volunteer in large
numbers in South County because they see it as a major step toward
becoming full-time firefighters, and that process does not seem to
be working in the North County fire district.
Director Wright responded that the conditions and rules
described by Mr. Scurlock exist in the North County; volunteers are
involved in support roles. However, they cannot get into a vehicle
and drive it to an emergency scene without proper training and
certification. In addition, there must be personal background
checks to avoid liability. There is no difference in the rules and
regulations for admission to the south county or north county fire
departments. Director Wright described the work his staff is doing
to accommodate potential volunteers by scheduling classes in the
daytime, at night, on weekends, and still there are those who have
not attended the classes.
Chairman Bird hoped we find a way to perpetuate the volunteer
corp in some fashion and see it continue to exist and grow and to
supplement the professional fire fighting force that we have.
Commissioner Wheeler felt that has occurred and mentioned that
he has worked with Director Wright and his staff and found they are
doing an outstanding professional job.
Director Wright thanked the Board and assured them he and his
staff will continue to support the volunteers and keep them active.
41
OCT 15 1991
li„
OCT 15 199'
acoic
KINGSLAKE SUBDIVISION - SINGLE LIGHT
The Board reviewed memo from OMB Director Joe Baird dated
October 9, 1991:
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
DATE: October 9, 1991
SUBJECT: KINGSLAKE SUBDIVISION - SINGLE LIGHT
•
FROM: Joseph A. Baird
OMB Director
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Kingslake Homeowner's Association is requesting the installation of one (1) streetlight at
the entrance of the Kingslake Subdivsion (6100 N. 58th Avenue). A charge of $12.00 per
light per month is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION
'Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for a
• streetlight, contingent upon completion of the following procedure:
. • Staff would bill Kingslake Homeowner's Association $144.00 in
..advance for the cost of one streetlights for a full year.
2. Staff would draft a standard single streetlight agreement between
Kingslake Homeowner's Association and Indian River County.
. Staff would add one light to the Master Streetlight Agreement
between Indian River County and Florida Power and Light.
4. By approval of this agenda item, the Board would authorize the
Chairman to sign the agreement between Indian River County and
Kingslake Homeowner's Association.
County Attorney Vitunac commented that in the above -listed
procedure number 4, the Chairman will not be signing the agreement.
It will be signed by the County Administrator.
Commissioner Scurlock asked what is being done to consolidate
the various street lighting districts.
Administrator Chandler reported there have been several staff
meetings,and he has scheduled a meeting with Florida Power & Light
for next Friday. His intent is to report back to the Board within
three or four weeks with an overall recommendation because if there
is a change recommended)we need to do so by January first.
42
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved and
authorized the County Administrator to execute the
agreement for a single streetlight between Kingslake
Homeowners' Association and Indian River County.
SAID DOCUMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
CLERK TO THE BOARD
HEALTH BENEFIT PROGRAM CONTRACTS
The Board reviewed memo from Personnel Director Jack Price
dated October 4, 1991:
To:. James Chandler,
County Administrator
From: Jack Price, Pernnel .
Date: October 4, 1991
Sub: Health Benefit
Program Contracts
'On'December 4, 1990 the Board of County Commissioners approved a
''Request for Proposals (91 -RFP -41), the purpose of which was to
obtain the services of a consultant to evaluate the County's health
;benefit program and recommend appropriate changes. The dual intent'
was to maintain competitive coverage for employees and to explore
..ways to limit program costs, which had been escalating rapidly.
On January 22, 1991 the Board of County Commissioners approved the.'
selection of Stanford & Co. as the consultant. Stanford and Co.'s
,analysis led to a recommendation to the Health Benefit Program
Committee that major revisions be accomplished in order to meet the;
original goals. Most significant among .the 'revisions was the
greatly expanded utilization of PPO providers for medical services.;.
The Plan redesign is complete and negotiations with the carrier and
PPO providers are finalized.,. Attached for Board of County
Commissioner's approval are:
•
1. Contract between Anthem Life Insurance Company of Florida and
Indian River County for Life, Accidental Death and
Dismemberment and Medical insurance through a "Minimum Premium
Plan" funding agreement.
2. Contract between American Health Network, Inc.
County for Utilization Management Services.
3. PPO provider contract between Gold, Vann
(Doctor's Clinic) and Indian River County.
and Indian River
& White, P. A.
4. PPO provider contract between Humana Hospital -Sebastian and
Indian River County.
5. PPO provider contract between Indian River Memorial Hospital
and Indian River County.
Also attached for information is the executed agreement between
Schlitt Insurance Services, Inc. and Anthem Life Insurance Company
of Florida for local agent services. The cost of this feature to
Indian River County will not exceed $5,000. for 1991-92.
43
OCT15 1991 _
F'•
ttu•
l
c)LL U'
r
OCT .1519
BOOK
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED. by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved the
contracts as listed above, as recommended by staff.
(CONTRACTS AS LISTED HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND NOW ON FILE IN OFFICE OF CLERK TO
THE BOARD)
The Chairman recessed the meeting briefly at 10:15 A. M. and
the Board reconvened at 10:30 A. M. with the same members present,
Commissioner Eggert being absent.
FEE SCHEDULE & FINES FOR ENFORCEMENT OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE
The Board reviewed memo from Assistant County Attorney Terry
O'Brien dated October 1, 1991:
TO: Board of County Commissioners WC) FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney
DATE: October 1, 1991
RE: FEE SCHEDULE AND FINES FOR ENFORCEMENT OF
: ;... RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCE
Attached is a proposed schedule of fees and fines to be used in
conjunction with the Right -of -Way Ordinance which is scheduled for
hearing on October 15, 1991.
Public Works Director James Davis stated staff proposes two
minor changes to the resolutions. On Resolution 91-157, he
suggested inserting an effective date of December 2, 1991 in order
to have time to educate the people regarding the fee schedule and
give them time to build that into their budget and procedural
process. On Resolution 91-158, the single asterisk should be moved
from "$50.00" to the title "Fine" at the top of that column. This
would make "plus cost of damage" applicable to the full table of
activities.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent, adopted Resolution
91-157 establishing a Fee Schedule for Construction
Within County Right -of -Way, with the above-mentioned
modifications recommended by staff.
44
RESOLUTION NO. 91- _152
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ESTABLISHING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR
CONSTRUCTION WITHIN COUNTY RIGHT-
OF-WAY.
WHEREAS, the recently adopted Right -of -Way Ordinance provides
that fees shall be established for applications for permits for
construction within the right-of-way,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
that the following fees are hereby established:
1. Residential driveways and construction $10.00
2. Commercial and industrial driveways and
construction $25.00
3. Utility construction and installation
excluding utility companies having a
valid franchise to operate in Indian
River County $25.00
4. Re -inspection fee $25.00
5. All other permit applications $25.00
All contractors working in the right-of-way or utilizing the
right-of-way under the conditions of the right-of-way ordinance are
subject to be charged for any County assistance required. This
includes development of plans, signs and damage to any County
owned property. The costs of time and material including the use of
equipment plus 10% administrative fee is the formula to be used in
calculating the charge.
The •resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner
Scurlock
Wheel er
follows:
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
, and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
Chairman Richard N. Bird
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye
Tye
y%C e
y�Ie
Absent
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 15 day of October , 1991, effective December 2,
1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
45
OCT 151991
Richard N. Bird
Chairman
mot( 64 FACE 550
OCT 15 1991
BOOK 84 FA,;F 561
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent, adopted Resolution
91-158 establishing a Schedule of Civil Penalties
for Violations of the Indian River County Right -of -
Way Ordinances, with the above-mentioned
modifications recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 91- 1 58
A •RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA ESTABLISIIING A SCHEDULE OF CIVIL
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY ORDINANCES.
WHEREAS, the recently adopted Right -of -Way Ordinance provides
that penalties shall be established for violations of the Ordinance by
resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
that,
The following civil penalties are hereby established:
Section Activity in Right -of -Way Fine*
310.06(1)(a) Unauthorized Construction $100.00
i 310.06(1)(b) Improper Construction $100.00
310.06(1)(c) Obstruction $100.00
i 310.06(1)(d) Unauthorized Over -sized Vehicles $100.00
310.06(1)(e) Discharge Fluids $100.00
310.06(1)(f) Unauthorized Utilities $100.00
310.06(1)(g) Improper Shrubs or Structures $100.00
310.06(1)(h) , Obstruction of Vision $100.00
310.06(1)(i) Vehicles Exceeding 5000 lbs. $ 50.00
310.06(1)(j) Wells & Septic Tanks $100.00
310.06(1)(k) Work Without Proper Traffic Controls $250.00
310.06(1)(1) Debris $100.00
310.06(1)(m) Business $250.00**
310.06(1)(n) Parades Without Permit $250.00
* plus cost of damage
** per day
The resolution was moved to adoption by Commissioner
Scurlock and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Absent
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this
15 -
day of
October , 1991.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
46
i 7
!By
Richard N. Bird
Chairman
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION; 20TH AVENUE EXTENSION INTO VERO BEACH
HIGHLANDS
The Board reviewed memo from County Right -of -Way Agent Donald
Finney dated September 26, 1991:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E.
County Engineer -
Donald G. Finney, SRA
County Right of Way Agen
SUBJECT: Right of Way Acquisition; 20th Avenue Extension into Vero
Beach Highlands
;:„FROM:
: DATE: September 26, 1991
DESCRIPTION AND. CONDITIONS
'Additional right of way,'20' x 300', is needed along the existing
35' right of way of 20th Avenue SW at the northwest corner of Vero
.Beach Highlands. George Lambeth is willing to sell the .14 acre
,.right of way,for $2,092.00, which is less than $15,000 per acre,
4 and in line with recent county right of way purchases from the same
owner.
^.The County,- in 1987, purchased from the same owner and same
'property at $12,000'per acre (see attached memorandum to the Board
of County Commissioners).
•
'In 1988 the County purchased additional right of way for the above
(again from the same owner and same property at $10,693 per acre.
.RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING
:This offer is reasonable and an equitable settlement. Staff
requests authorization to purchase the .14 acre of right of way for
$2,092.00.
FUNDING
Impact Fee District 6 account.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) authorized the
purchase of the .14 acre of right-of-way for
$2,092.00.
47
OCT 15 1991
Et001(.. 81 PAGE J[
OCT ib 199(
BOO
INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD PHASE III, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF
PARCEL III
The Board reviewed memo from Public Works Director Davis dated
October 1, 1991:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
�.:.•: _ Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard Phase IV
'Environmental. Assessment of Parcel 111
DATE: October 1, 1991 FILE: irblll.agn
411 +3 VTI
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
;An"environmental assessment report on Parcel 111 must be
.prepared by October 31, 1991 for a pending jury trial. The
attached Work Order No. 6 provides for Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to perform field reconnaissance, land
surveying, drafting and incidental services to determine
wetland jurisdiction within subject parcel and prepare an
environmental assessment report at a cost of $14,800.
•
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff ,•recommends that• the County execute -.the attached
agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. Funding to
be from Fund 309, Indian River Boulevard North: -
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) authorized the
Chairman to execute Work Order No. 6 to the
agreement with Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc.,
dated December 12, 1989, as recommended by staff.
SAID WORK ORDER IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
CLERK TO THE BOARD
AMENDMENT TO DNR FRDAP AGREEMENT FOR TREASURE SHORES PARK PHASE I
The Board reviewed memo from Capital Projects Manager Terry
Thompson dated October 8, 1991:
48
TO:
James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.,
'.Public Works Director
--FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.,.
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Amendment to DNR FRDAP Agreement for
• Treasure Shores Park - Phase I
'DATE: October 8, 1991 FILE: frdapamd.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
•
Attached is an amendment to FRDAP Grant No. F89-099 to
extend the construction completion date and advance funds
for Treasure Shores Park Phase I. All advanced funds will
be placed in an interest bearing account and all interest
'earned will be paid to the Department of Natural Resources.
•
The County has made every effort to complete the project by
.the original ;grant deadline of November 1, 1991. Staff
:requested an extension because •of concern that 'the
playground equipment and site furnishings might ;not •be
'. delivered and •,installed .prior . to the November • :1,' "'1991
r `deadline.
?The attached Amendment extends the construction completion
deadline to•February 1,.1991. However, Treasure Shores Park
is scheduled to open when.construction of the dune walkover
and lifeguard tower'is completed on December 16, 1991 ",'
' RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING . '' . ° :> °; s°' °'k +•+~':'
"Staff recommends' that'. the Chairman be'authorized to execute
the attached Amendment_to FRDAP.Agreement No. F89-099. �.
The County's $60,000 match for construction is funded from
Account 311-210-572-066.51 - Treasure Shores Park.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) authorized the
Chairman to execute the Amendment to FRDAP Agreement
No. F89-099, as recommended by staff.
SAID AMENDMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
CLERK TO THE BOARD
SOUTH BEACH RECREATION PATH CHANGES AND ADDITIONS
The Board reviewed memo from Capital Projects Manager Terry
Thompson dated October 8, 1991:
49
OCT t5 °i 9
ROOK P„
��;�, .1
OCT 15 a991(
BOOK
TO:
James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E. U'
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: South Beach Recreation Path
Changes and Additions
REF. LETTER: Neil Schopke, Schopke Construct.&on and
Engine :ring to T _pry Thompson dated
October 8, ir;:
DATE: October 8, 1991 FILE: alapath.agn
•DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Schopke Construction and Engineering, Inc. is under contract
with the City of Vero Beach for the construction of a reuse
water main along A1A in conjunction with the County's South '
Beach Recreation Path. Construction of these two projects
were combined through a Joint Construction Project Agreement
t between Indian River County and the City, of Vero Beach.
•
Recent rains .have identified two drainage,.problems.• The
"first problem will require installation of a•. concrete pipe
under a driveway. The second problem will require raising
the swale grade approximately one foot. These•revisions are
detailed on the attached referenced letter. v.. •N i +._::
::The cost of these changes and additions is $6,342.20.' This
'..added to the current contract amount of $218,026.89 results
�'in a new contract amount of $224,369.09. "'' 1The .. total ..
:estimated cost of *the recreation path in the •special'
:'assessment providing resolution was• $409,286.67 which.
includes engineering and administration costs: - '
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the Board request the City •of Vero
Beach•to issue a Change Order for the attached changes and
additions. Funding is from Account 173-214-541-066.31.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) authorized staff
to request the City of Vero Beach to issue a Change
Order for the above -listed additions and changes as
recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE FIND GRANT AGREEMENT
FOR ROUND ISLAND PARK IMPROVEMENTS
The Board reviewed memo from Capital Projects Manager Terry
Thompson dated October 8, 1991:
50
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
• • FROM: •Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manager
;'�,•. SUSJECT7 Resolution Authorizing the Execution of the
• FIND GRANT AGREEMENT for Round Island Park
'; A` Improvements
DATE: October 8, 1991 FILE: .find-rip.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) has requested
that the County accept a $130,000 Waterways Assistance
Project grant for Round Island Park river access
improvements. Scheduled improvements include construction'`!
of paved access road, parking, restroom building, additional ,
boat ramp, and waterfront boardwalk with fishing docks. ..
The attached resolution authorizes acceptance of the grant
and grant.. conditions; and execution of the FIND Project
-Agreement. "r ` ; ;,
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
,'''Staff recommends that the Chairman be authorized to.execute
'the attached resolution and the .attached FIND ,Project
Agreement. •
:'The County's $130,000 match for construction will be
.funded from Florida Boating Improvement Program. (FBIP)
unobligated funds available to Indian River County.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) adopted Resolution
91-159 approving the acceptance and execution of
Florida Inland Navigation District Waterways
Assistance Project Agreement No. IR -91-9, and
authorized the Chairman to execute the FIND Project
Agreement, as recommended by staff.
(AGENT NOW RECEIVER ANR ONT FITIE IN THE O1.r10E OF CLERK TO
THE BOARD)
51
00'15 1991
torr
84 [A6[56C
OCT _5199(
s.�
BOOK.
RESOLUTION NO. 91- 159
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
APPROVING THE ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF
FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT WATERWAYS
ASSISTANCE PROJECT AGREEMENT NO. IR -91-9
fALL
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida accepts the conditions of and enters into Project
Agreement No. IR -91-9 with the Florida Inland Navigation District
(hereinafter"FIND") for Round Island Park Improvements.
WHEREAS, the total project cost will be greater than
$260,000 to be comprised of $130,000 to be contributed by FIND
and a minimum of $130,000 to be contributed, in cash a,id/or
In -Kind Services by Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County warrants and represents that it
has appropriated $130,000 in funds for completion of the project.
WHEREAS, -said Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, does retain jurisdictional control, and maintain
said park and facilities; and
WHEREAS, Indian River County agrees that when completed, the
project site. shall be dedicated for the public use for a minimum
period of twenty-five (25) years.
WHEREAS, continued maintenance of proposed improvements to
this public park facility will be in the interest of all the
citizens of Indian River County;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, that this official document
does hereby certify the Board of County Commissioners' intent to
accept the conditions` of and enter into Project Agreement NO.
IR -91-9 to which this Resolution will be attached;
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Scurlock
and seconded by Commissioner Bowman , and, being put to
a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Absent
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
52
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 15 day of October , 1991.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR EASTBOUND RIGHT -TURN LANE
ALONG CR512 AT CHESSER'S GAP AND RIGHT-OF-WAY PURCHASE
The Board reviewed memo from Public Works Director Jim Davis
dated October 9, 1991:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Request for Reimbursement of Costs for Eastbound Right
Turn Lane along CR512'at Chesser's Gap and Right -of -Way
Purchase .
DATE: October 9, 1991 FILE: chesgap.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On August 17, 1991, the Board directed staff to recommend an
equitable compensation to be paid to the developer of the
Chesser's Gap project for construction of an eastbound
right -turn lane along CR512 to serve the Chesser's Gap
Development and the proposed east extension of Fleming
Street. In addition, 27' of additional right-of-way along
the south side of CR512 is under consideration for purchase
by the County to accommodate the above described right turn
lane west of Fleming Street extension and a drainage swale•
to the east. ' ' .•
�,,-
t., .. ..e. «•.m-,, ;47...
•
Dr. Henry Fischer,•developer of Chesser's Gap, -is requesting
reimbursement of the following costs: .
CR512 Right -turn lane $11,193 •
Drainage Culvert • . $12,170 ; =•� : ,
$23,363
_CR512 Right -of -Way
18,863.28 s.f. @ $3.18/s.f. •.$60,000 ,.:r
Total Compensation Requested $83,363
Dr. Fischer has also constructed approximately 2,000 1.f. of
two lane roadway along the Fleming Street Extension and has
submitted an itemized cost summary of $246,620. This
roadway will have a capacity of 7,700 vehicles per day as
stated in the Developer's Traffic Study. The Chesser's Gap
development alone will generate 9,287 or 16,174 trips per
day, depending upon which of the two proposed development
scenarios presented to County staff is implemented.
53
OCT 15 1991
!{l:01 FAIH
OCT t5199
r-�
BOOK 84 F'A E 5r
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Once the Chesser's Gap project is completed, the subject
right -turn lane and Fleming Street Extension roadway may be
over design capacity due to site related Chesser's Gap
impacts and will probably operate at LOS -"D" during average
conditions. The County Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance
(Chapter 953) allows for Traffic Impact Fee Credits for "the
contribution, payment, construction or land dedication" if
the project:
1) Meets an expans-.on need of the County's major road
network system which is identified in the County
20 -year Transportation Capital Improvement Program; or
2) Provides a capital road improvement to the County's.
major road network system which provides capacity
expansion necessitated by the proposed land development
activity.
In staff's opinion, the Fleming Street Extension will
perform a dual function by serving as the main collector
driveway for the various lots within the Chesser's Gap
Development,' as well as serving as the western portion of
the Fleming Street collector road thoroughfare. The design
and construction of the road, however, is typical of a two
lane collector driveway for the development and does not
provide for a left -turn lane to serve the proposed driveway
access points 'along the 2000' Chesser's Gap frontage.
Through traffic will be restrained by vehicles queing to
left turn.
A recent appraisal was performed by Calloway and Price,
Inc., Professional Appraisers, and the value of the 27' wide
by approximately 500' long portion of right-of-way along
CR512, which is desirable to accommodate drainage for the
eastbound right turn lane,, is $ 23,600. The Developer is
requesting payment from the County for this 27'
right-of-way, in addition to reimbursement in the amount of
$23,363 for construction of the right turn lane along CR512.
Staff has defined the following alternatives:
• Alternative No. 1
;r. ..
The right -turn lane as•'constructed will serve a dual
,function of serving site related turns to the Chesser's
Gap project as well. as the. future Fleming Street
extension. • Payment of 100% of the cost of the
. additional CR512 'right-of-way,' (as determined by the
recent appraisal) along .the project frontage is
recommended. The -Right turn lane along CR512 wiII,4, in
• the -short term; -'only serve the traffic attracted to the
Chesser's Gap project .:".;When right-of-way is acquired
and Fleming Street extended further east, through
traffic will benefit.";!The reimbursement under .this
alternative is: •.. • , n
100% cost of additional right-of-way along Chesser's
Gap frontage = $ 23,600
100% Cost of right turn lane ($23,363)
Total Compensation = $46,963.00
54
Alternative No. 2
Compensate the developer for 100% of the cost of the
additional 27' of right-of-way, but deny compensation
for the turn lane until Fleming Street Extension is
complete to US 1, at which time the County would
consider reimbursement.
Turn lane $ 0
Right-of-way $ 23,600
$ 23,600
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1 which would reimburse the
developer of the .Chesser's Gap project,$46,963.
Funding to be from District 3 Traffic Impact Fees. (101-153-
541-067.13)
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) authorized cash
reimbursement to Dr. Henry Fischer as developer of
Chesser's Gap in the amount of $46,963 to cover 100%
of the cost of the additional right-of-way along
Chesser's Gap frontage ($23,600) and 100% of the
cost of right -turn lane ($23,363), as recommended by
staff.
(WARRANTY DK0) RECEIVED AND NOW ON FILE IN OFFICE OF CLERK TO BOARD)
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTH COUNTY REVERSE OSMOSIS
FACILITY AND PROPOSED SOUTH COUNTY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Utility Services Director Pinto made the following
presentation:
55
OCT 15 1991
kOOK a. PA6L b
ry
OCT 15 'x'993
C GE b i'..
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SEPTEMBER 17, 1991
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F AIN
AND STAFFED CAPITAL P "TS ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT RVICES
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTH COUNTY
R.O. FACILITY AND THE PROPOSED SOUTH COUNTY WWTP
BACKGROUND
With the expansion of the South County well field at the South
County R.O. Facility and proposed construction of a South County
Wastewater Treatment Plant at that site, there is a need for
additional land at this site. (See attached letters of
recommendation from CDM and PBS&J.) The property we are proposing
to purchase is on the east boundary of the existing water treatment
plant on Oslo Road. The property is a ten -acre tract that runs
between Oslo Road and the right-of-way of a proposed section of 7th
Street SW, contiguous to the existing site. The ten -acre tract is
split into two types of zoning --the front one half is zoned heavy
commercial, and the back one half is zoned residential (see attached
location map).
,ANALYSIS
We have considered many viable reasons for expanding the South
County projects site. They are as follows:
1. The additional ten acres will allow a greater buffer from
residential development proposed on 7th Street, SW (the north
end of the proposed site purchase) from both the existing water
plant and the proposed wastewater plant. This additional
buffering will help with future odor control and in meeting
ever-increasing planning and zoning setbacks, etc.
2. The purchase of the additional ten acres will also eliminate
the possible necessity of mitigating any possible effect of the
ultimately proposed future pumping rate at the South County
well field. This problem has also been brought up (i.e.,
possible need for mitigation) by the St. John's River Water
Management District during our current Consumptive Use Permit,
(CUP) modification application.
3. With regard to the proposed South County WWTP, as well as the
previously mentioned buffering effect, the land purchase will
allow for future construction of effluent storage tanks at this
site.
In summary, we feel the purchase of the aforementioned ten -acre
tract of land will be of great long-term advantage to the County.
The appraisal of the property that was reviewed (dated January 4,
1990) by Armfield & Wagner indicates that an average price of
± $33,000.00 per acre, or a total of $330,000.00, would be equitable
(see the attached summary and conclusion sheet from that report).
The Utilities Department would like to proceed with the negotiation
and purchase of the aforementioned property.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
.Board of County Commissioners authorize the Utilities Department to
negotiate with the' current property owner for purchase of the
.above -listed property.
56
NIP
I. R. Co.
PARKSITE .
(EXISTING)
51
tea
: Ae
'W.OJ
A..
0000
001.0
A
kt
I. R. Co.
UTILITIES
PLANTSITE
(EXISTING)
•a
PRIVATELY OWNED •
9trr:TR3
�r
0090
• 001,0
:0:A.•.
40/"V
/ : (:•••
9 4 , . •
•
•���,
•• <t:.,;
NOT PART OF PURCHASE
/Ln ,.,i
AC
O,y0
.¢ori!
R 6
.rr
—
'Tar
..711
ra3•
'4 2!
ee
23
24
4.16,C..ma!w i6
PROPOSED PROPERTY
FOR PURCHASE:
OWNED BY
HOSKINS R, TRFN(`H Ing '/
The subject property is in cross -hatch.
2
Mr. Pinto pointed to another section, identified as TR9, and
suggested the County should consider purchasing a portion of that
parcel to square -off the Utility plant site. This would provide
ample space for future needs and protect the operation of the
existing facility.
Discussion ensued regarding the present uses of the property
to the east of the subject property and Director Pinto said the
frontage portion was commercial and about half -way in it changes to
residential.
Commissioner Scurlock asked about the ownership of the subject
property.
Director Pinto stated the owner is Hoskins and Trench, Inc.,
but it has been brought to his attention that the mortgage holder
is foreclosing on the property and he was concerned about who might
57
Ott 161991
OCT 15 1991
purchase this property and what might be built there.
County Administrator Chandler interjected that Commissioner
Eggert has disclosed her financial interest in the subject property
and has filed a Memorandum of Voting Conflict,( which is on file in
the office of Clerk to the Board.) He added that Commissioner
Eggert has not been involved in staff's recommendation to the Board
and if she were present she would have abstained from discussion of
this agenda item.
Commissioner Scurlock directed the discussion to the parcel
indicated as TR9 on the above diagram and suggested staff should
investigate the potential purchase of that parcel and, while we're
at it, the 3.1 acre parcel should be included in the research
because it looks as though it would be better for storage of reuse
water.
Director Pinto felt it would be sufficient to purchase 150
feet of the property indicated as TR9, but agreed that the 3.1 acre
parcel could be used for additional stormwater capacity storage.
Commissioner Scurlock asked, and Director Pinto confirmed, if
we did not acquire any of this property it would not impact our
existing operation and that the main reason for investigating the
purchase of these properties would be for buffering and additional
storage.
Director Pinto added another reason is to avoid facing major
problems if those properties were to be developed in the future.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED
by Commissioner Wheeler, authorizing County
Administrator Chandler to proceed with negotiations
on the 10 -acre tract owned by Hoskins & Trench,
Inc., and to research the 3.1 -acre parcel and the
parcel designated as TR9 for possible purchase in
the future.
Discussion ensued regarding procedure for obtaining appraisals
and Chairman Bird clarified the motion is to authorize staff to
proceed with negotiations on the ten -acre parcel and obtain
appraisals on all three parcels.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
It was voted on and carried unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent).
58
WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT - ROCKRIDGE
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated. September 19, 1991:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SEPTEMBER 19, 1991
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTIL
PREPARED NOEL J. McMAHON
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL SPECtALI
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY
ICE
ERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT - ROCKRIDGE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -91 -22 -DS
IRC BID NO. 91-113
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 3
BACKGROUND
On December 1, 1978, the Chairman of the Board of County
Commissioners signed the agreement to purchase Mid -Florida
Utilities, including the water mains and distribution piping in the
Rockridge Subdivision. The water distribution system, installed
prior to 1958, consisted of galvanized steel pipe, ranging in size
from 3/4 inches to 2 inches. Over the years, the distribution
system has been subject to corrosion and build-up of material on the
inside of the pipes. This has resulted in leaks, broken pipes, and
reduced pressure in the houses in the Rockridge Subdivision. On
August 5, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners approved the award
of the Labor Contract bid to Driveways, Inc., (Bid No. 91-113).
(See attached Minutes, pages 16 through 19). The Department of
Utility Services proposes to use this Labor Contract to replace the
distribution system.
ANALYSIS
The cost to replace these old galvanized lines with new 2 -inch PVC
piping using the Labor Contract is $108,890.77. (See attached Work
Authorization No. 3 with Driveways, Inc.) . The pipe, valves, and
fittings will be supplied by the County at an estimated cost of
$28,864.51. Engineering, inspection, and permitting will be
performed by Indian River County staff at an estimated cost of
$13,775.00. The replacement of these lines will reduce the
maintenance costs and service interruptions and increase the
pressure in the houses in the Rockridge Subdivision. This
replacement was budgeted through renewal and replacement funds.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve Work Authorization No. 3 with
Driveways, Inc., for the amount of $108,890.77 to replace the water
distribution system.
r`u151991
s -r
59
a=
Pur 4 PAIGE 574
I
OCT 15 1991
POOK 84 F'A%
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved Work
Authorization No. 3 with Driveways, Inc. in the
amount of $108,890.77 to replace the water
distribution system in Rockridge, as recommended by
staff.
SAID DOCUMENT WILL BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO
THE BOARD WHEN FULLY EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
PETITION FOR WATER SERVICE IN THE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - 41ST COURT
NORTH OF FIRST STREET
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated September 27, 1991:
DATE:
TO:
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILISERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHASTAI
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF ASSE ;C1��` -10
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT:
SEPTEMBER 27, 1991
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATO
PETITION FOR WATER SERVICE IN THE MEADOWS S/D
41ST COURT - NORTH OFF 1ST STREET, SW
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -91 -31 -DS
BACKGROUND
A petition has been received for a water main extension for 41st
Court to supply potable water to its residents. We are now coming
to the Board of County Commissioners to seek approval, to begin
design of the above project. (See attached petition and plat map.)
ANALYSIS
The subdivision contains 16 lots owned by 16 owners. One of the
lots abutting on 1st Street, SW is already on County water. The
remaining 15 shall benefitfrom this project. The 10 property
owners signing the petition represent 66.67% of the properties to b
served. The petition was picked up September 10, 1991 and returned
September 23, 1991. . Several owners were not readily available to
sign due to being out of town or simply hesitant.
All of the lots in this project are one-half acre. According to
Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan and the County Public
Health Unit, Division of Environmental Health, new lots utilizing
well and septic systems must be a minimum of one-half acre -in size.
Lots not meeting these minimum standards are called "undersized
lots."
The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment
project.
60
This project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners
along the proposed water line route. In the interim, financing will
be through the use of impactfee funds. Design services will be
provided by the Department of Utility Services.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval
of the above -listed project, in order that they may proceed with the
design engineering work in preparation for the special assessment
project.
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT
OF UTILITY SERVICES ASSESSMENT
PROTECT NO. UW -91 -31 -DS: THE
MEADOWS/41ST COURT
--- nu. .`�(
GG,
108
MEADOWS
C COUNTRY
nSOJARE
n
1+! 188. 1 .�/�•
If ® 3
16 '�rl'S�+'► 1516 c+ 44 V14 4 1s
1a 1r i8 E
v`Y !y, ° 01z
to taJE
11,107.45 123.
N 1 1 �3 wt 011
a 2.5= ..139.5 -
14
82.4:1 107.54
0 12
13
40
.. —21s' 2-212
ua
= -rf
w411
•!G a% ra
to • cD
191 00' > ES
do
=11 t Vj 60
1-
K
. o
4_AG
. ,
!i
..01.:. I+•�_-•,
vy m
141.23
. •
I
! Ar
51 .117
6°• .d 15 .1!
n
_ w
2 40• 4 2
OCT 15 1991
$4i^.:s- D>Ke
•
! yiv.i � rieL+9
.� nNgo
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved water
service in the Meadows Subdivision and directed the
Utility Services Department to proceed with the
design engineering work in preparation for the
special assessment project, as recommended by staff.
61
m
J"t FmiF.
REVISIO1
I M I JAN.1,1986
IN IJAN.1,158
0 I JAN. L tS4P .I
76
OCT 15 199i
BOOK
REUSE SERVICE AREA ORDINANCE
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated September 27, 1991:
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
PREPARED
AND STAFFED
BY:
SUBJECT:
SEPTEMBER 27, 1991
JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
TERRANCE G; PIN
DIRECTOR OF UT SERVICES
ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E.
pd
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
REUSE SERVICE AREA ORDINANCE (RULE 17-610, F.A.C.
ADOPTION)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -91 -29 -ED
BACKGROUND
On August 29, 1991, Indian River County received a permit for the
Sea Oaks Wastewater Treatment Plant reuse service area. This permit
allows the County to construct a reuse water distribution system,
including distribution lines for the Town of Orchid and Windsor
Development. One specific condition (No. 18) of the permit (see
attached) requires the Department of Utility Services to establish a
Reuse Ordinance within 90 days of the permit issuance. The Reuse
Ordinance will establish the procedures for user controls and
construction practices as required in Rule 17-610, Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.).
ANALYSIS
. :;
On January 15, 1991, McQueen and Associates, Inc., was authorized to
assist the County in obtaining the Reuse Service Area Permit, as a.
part of the requirement for expansion of the Sea Oaks Wastewater
Treatment Plant (see attached agenda item and letter). The
Department of Environmental Regulation expressed its concern about
the possibility of cross connection of the reuse system to the
public potable water in Rule 17-610, F.A.C. It assigns the
responsibility of cross connection control solely to the Public
Utility entity. Attached with this agenda is the proposed agreement
with McQueen and Associates, Inc., to prepare the Reuse Water
Ordinance. The reuse water ordinance shall be accepted County -wide
for this purpose. The proposed upset limit for the engineering
services is $4,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department recommends that the Board
approve this proposal and authorize the
agreement with McQueen and Associates,
engineering service will be provided from
account.
of County Commissioners
Chairman to execute the
Inc. Funding for this
the wastewater impact fee
Director Pinto cautioned the Board that a reuse plant has a
cradle -to -grave responsibility for production and distribution of
reuse water, to see that it is used safely and in ways that meet
all requirements of the law.
62
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) approved the
proposal and authorized the Chairman to execute the
agreement with McQueen and Associates, Inc., as
recommended by staff.
SAID AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
CLERK TO THE BOARD
LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION
Assistant County Attorney Collins stated that he would like to
present two additional items at the meeting of the Legislative
Delegation on the 13th. The first item concerns the responsiveness
of the Department of Community Affairs and the cooperation we have
received from them. He felt he had enough experience to make
comments. He also mentioned that a few weeks ago the Board adopted
a Resolution dealing with the election financing trust fund, the
1/2 or 1-1/2 percent assessment on political contributions and
filing fees. Commissioner Wheeler felt, even though the Resolution
has been mailed out, he wanted the subject brought up to see what
the legislative delegates are going to do with it. He would like
to see legislation introduced to change that law.
FIREARMS RANGE COMMITTEE
Chairman Bird submitted the following report of the Firearms
Range Committee:
The committee agreed that we need to reassess the issue and come
up with what money is available for a range. They recommended
that the County Commission be approached to see how much money
they would be willing to expend for purchase of property for a
range.
They also discussed the possibility of a combined use of some
property under review by the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee.
If the County Commission is willing to spend some money to
purchase property for a range, then send a message to the land
owners in :.Indian River County that we are interested in
purchasing 100 acres fora range. That will give us an idea of
what kind of cost we are talking about, and -whether we can go
ahead or not.
They also discussed the advisability of combining this issue with
the land acquisition issue on the November, 1992 referendum;
would it help or harm the land acquisition issue if acquisition
of property for the range was added to the referendum?
63
OCT 15 1991
RUri, '* FA;,EE 5-1.18
OCT i51 91
BOOK
:; F't1;E
Chairman Bird summarized the efforts of the committee over the
past six years to get land donated for this purpose and the
frustration of having no funds with which to purchase any land.
Chairman Bird added that he had received comments at various times
over the years that the County spends money for parks and other
things and why don't we express a willingness to spend money for a
shooting range. The committee asked him, as chairman, to bring it
to the Commission to get some further direction from the Commission
as to where the committee should go with this as far as the ability
to purchase property. No funds have been budgeted in this year.
There was a carryover of, perhaps, $50,000 for developing plans and
specifications for a shooting range, which plans ceased when the
site on Route 60 did not appear to be feasible for a range.
Commissioner Scurlock commented that Chairman Bird had taken
some heat because the Commission did not provide any funds for a
shooting range but rather expected the committee to find some free
land. He felt the reason is priorities; there are so many things
in the County that need to be done and paid for, such as roads and
drainage. He also suggested that a possible way to do it is to
approach a large land holder and, in conjunction with, possibly,
utilities, the land acquisition committee, other resources, and the
potential users of the shooting range, and make an effort to raise
funds. He mentioned the possibility of leasing a piece of property
from an owner who may have no plans fordevelopment for twenty
years.
Chairman Bird said he, as chairman of the Firearms Range
Committee, would continue working with all the agencies and
individuals that they were working with and continue'on the basis
of the suggestions as well as look for more support.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
Chairman Bird presented the following report of the Parks and
Recreation Committee:
Rguest 'from Environmental Learning Center to Use Hobart
Park for a Fund-raiser
The committee recommended approval of the concept as long as
details can be worked out with County staff as to cleaning
the park after the event, etc.
=;;It.was requested that this be brought back to the committee
at afuture meeting with a detailed plan of exactly what is
being proposed for the fund-raiser.
64
NEI
2) Review of Plan for Donald MacDonald Park and Dale Wimbrow
Park
;The committee discussed the request of the Forestry Service
to allow their forest rangers to remain in Donald MacDonald
:Park, .along with their equipment, after the lease ',is
'terminated., They also discussed what improvements should be
done in the park. ;.a
'The committee unanimously recommended that the rangers and
the Highway Patrolman be allowed to stay in the park, along
with their equipment, feeling that this would be a deterrent
to vandalism, and it would also provide additional fire
protection for the North County. ,They also recommended that
the County place 'a responsible: person there full-time to.;
'oversee the. park, collect rental fees, make repairs, etc. '
Jim Davis was asked to investigate what kind of concession
could be placed in the parkto help pay for the park host
and necessary repairs. Jim Davis and Rex Hailey were asked
to make a trip to the park to see what needs to be done,
such as replacement of picnic tables, parking facilities,
etc., that could be paid for through Florida Boating
Improvement Funds.
It was also recommended that the rangers and Highway
Patrolman be allowed to live there on an annual basis with
the same arrangement they now have with the state.
Committee asked Forest Supervisor Joe Spataro to ascertain
if the Forestry Service would be willing to continue
responsibility of the park until September, 1992 to
correspond with the County's fiscal year.
3) Councilman Pease reported that the Vero Beach City Council
decided to eliminate all of the old Barber Bridge when the
new bridge is built. There is a proposal to construct parks
at each end of the old bridge placement, or the fire station
could be expanded on the east side. There is also a
proposal to build fishing docks.
In discussion regarding the old Barber Bridge, Chairman Bird
suggested a facility for fishing, such as a catwalk, should be
incorporated in the plan. Public Works Director Davis had inferred
from his meetings with the planning group that it might be feasible
on the east side but the west side involves the mosquito
impoundment area which is environmentally sensitive and there would
be no ability for people to pull off the road and park their cars.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert being absent) directed staff to
contact the City of Vero Beach indicating our
interest in including a fishing facility in the
plans for the new bridge.
65
OCT 15 1991
BOOK 84 fbSij
OCT 15 ta
BOOK
PNVLt+A,.
NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Chairman Bird announced that immediately upon adjournment the
Board would reconvene as the District Board of Fire Commissioners
of the North County Fire District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Chairman Bird announced that immediately upon adjournment the
Board would reconvene as the District Board of Fire Commissioners
of the South County Fire District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
WEST COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
Chairman Bird announced that immediately upon adjournment the
Board would reconvene as the District Board of Fire Commissioners
of the West County Fire District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
Chairman Bird announced that immediately upon adjournment the
Board would reconvene as the Board of Commissioners of the
Environmental Control Board.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 11:35 o'clock A. M.
ATTEST:
J. K. Barton, Clerk Richard N. Bird, Chairman
66