HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/28/1992BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
%% AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1992
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1840 25TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman
Margaret C. Bowman, Vice Chairman
Richard N. Bird
Don C. Scurlock, Jr.
Gary C. Wheeler
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. .Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 A. M. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION - None
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Gary* C. Wheeler
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
a. As Item 7-Q on Consent Agenda, a Proclamation designating Feb.9-15,1992,
as Rockridge Week.
b. As Item 11-H-6, (2) Subordination of utility liens.
.c. As Item 13-A-2, a reminder of the 1st Anniversary celebration of Main Library.
S. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of First Quarter Safety Award - 1992
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Special Meeting of 12/20/91
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Duplicate Tax Certificate No. 0791, in
the sum of $212.44 for Rudolph F. Gipson, Sr.
B. Received and placed on file in the Office of Clerk to
the Board:
Copy of Minutes of Quarterly Meeting of the Board of
Supervisors of Sebastian River Water Control District,
held on December 3, 1991.
C. Semi -Annual Bond Review
( memorandum dated January 8, 1992 )
D. CARL Application Deadline for the "Padgett Branch"
Property
(memorandum dated January 21, 1992)
E. Austin J. Taylor, Public Nuisance Violation,
3450 13th St.
( memorandum dated January 7, 1992 )
JAN 28 1992
JAN 28 19,P?
9:05 a. m.
r100K
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd):
F. Release of Easement Request by: Tommy L.- and Essie' M.
_Z Turner, Lot 4 6 5, Blk. C, Garden of Eden S/D
( memorandum dated January 13, 1992 )
G. Evans Properties, Inc.'s Request for an Extension
Site Plan Approval for a Ware reuse. 09// q/Rs7-i /P
.(memorandum dated January 20, 1992)
C�
H. Vero Building Corp.'s Request for Extension of the
Colonial Gardens S/D, Unit 2, Prelim. Plat Approval
(memorandum dated January 20, 1992)
I. Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant Progress
Report E Reimbursement Invoice
( memorandum dated January 9, 1992 )
J. Request for Floodplain Cut 1;► Fill Balance Waiver for
Donald and Mary -Ann Page Residence, Lot 4, Bik. 17,
Vero Lake Estates, Unit 3, 8205 92nd Ave.
( memorandum dated January 17, 1992 )
K. IRC Bid #92-49 / Typewriter Maint. Contract
( memorandum dated January 20, 1992 )
L. IRC Bid #92-76 / Surplus Sale #2
( memorandum dated January 20, 1992 )
M. Sole Source for Hydraulic Truck Conveyor
( memorandum dated January 20, 1992 )
N. I.R.C. Jail Phase III - Furnishings Budget
( memorandum dated January 20, 1992 )
O. 1992 Firefighters / Indian River County Fair
(memorandum- dated January 20, 1992 )
P. IRC Bid #92-53 / Insurance Consultant
( memorandum dated January 20, 1992 )
8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Proposed Minor Amedment to the Harbor Town
Center DRI Develop ent Order
(memorandum dated January 16, 1992)
2. AN ORDINANCE OF I'INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 206 -
HOUSING
( memorandum dated ' anuary 8, 1992 )
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S TTERS
None
r
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
None
B. EMERGENCY SERVICES
1. Purchase of E911 Logging Recorder for Vero Beach
Police Dept. Public Safety Answering Point and
Budget Amendment No. 011
( memorandum dated January 16, 1992 )
2. Approval of Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Aid
between I . R. C. , Brevard County, 8 I.R.C. Emer-
gency Services District
( memorandum dated January 13, 1992 )
( also shown under North 8 South County
Districts for adoption by those Boards)
3. Approval of Funding for Insurance Coverage for
Volunteer Fire E EMS Fund Raising Events
(memorandum dated January 17, 1992)
( also shown under North S South County
Districts for adoption by those Boards)
C. GENERAL SERVICES
None
D. LEISURE SERVICES
Request for Proposal - Recreation Study
( memorandum dated January 20, 1992 )
a E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
None
IJW9
F. PERSONNEL
None
G. PUBLIC WORKS
I. Right -of -Way Purchase / 44th Ave. / Swezey
(memorandum dated January 20, 1992)
2. Resolutions to Provide for Paving E Drainage
Improvements to 6 set Public Hearing Date for:
a) 11th St. SW, 11th PI. SW 8 Madrid Ave.
in Granada Gardens S/D . . . .
b) 83rd Place, 84th St. 8 Tropical Ave. .In
Graves Addition to Wabasso S/D
( memorandum dated January 17, 1992 )
3. Resolutions to Provide for Paving 8 Drainage
Improvements to a Portion of the Roads in Floral
Pk. S/D, and Ranch Estates S/D 8 set date for
Public Hearing
(memorandum dated January 21, 1992)
4. Sandridge Golf Crs. 2nd 18 Conservation Easement
(memorandum dated January 22, 1992)
5. Treasure Shores Pk. Ph. I, C.O. #2 8 Final Payment
(memorandum dated January 22, 1992)
I
9 2�� J
Bonn F'AGE c)
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd):
H. UTILITIES
2
1 • Water Service Project in Floridacres S/D
(36th Ave., South of 8th St.), Res. 18 I I
( memorandum dated January 13, 1992 )
2. Purchase of Property Contiguous to the South
County R.O. Facility (the Nursery owned by
Hoskins and Trench, Inc.)
( memorandum dated January 17, 1992 )
3. Preliminary Engineering Design 8 Work Authori-
zation No. 2 - So. Co. Wastewater Collection
System & Reuse Water Transmission System
( memorandum dated January 15, 1992 )
4. Removal of Roseland Plaza Wastewater Treatment
Plant
(memorandum dated January 16, 1992)
5. Oslo Road Force Main Redesign 6 Vista Properties
Wastewater Treatment Facilities Sewer Inter-
connection
( memorandum dated January 17, 1992 )
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. CHAIRMAN CAROLYN K. EGGERT
Children's Services Straw Ballot
(memorandum dated January 21, 1992)
B. VICE CHAIRMAN MARGARET C. BOWMAN
C. COMMISSIONER RICHARD N. BIRD
D. COMMISSIONER DON C. SCURLOCK, JR.
E. COMMISSIONER GARY C. WHEELER
A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida Supporting the Surface
Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program
n
jAii �M,2 . = I
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS
A. NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
1. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 10/15/91
2. Approval of Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Aid
between I . R . C. , Brevard County & the I.R.C.
Emergency Services District ace Item 11132.
( memorandum dated January 13, 1992 )
3. Approval of Funding for Insurance Coverage for
Volunteer Fire 5 EMS Fund Raising Events see Item 11133
( memorandum dated January 17, 1992) '
B. SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT
1. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 10/15/91
2. Approval of Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Aid
between I . R . C . , Brevard County F, the I.R.C.
Emergency Services District see Item 11132
( memorandum dated January 13, 1992) -
3. Approval of Funding for Insurance Coverage for
Volunteer Fire & EMS Fund Raising Events see Item 1163
( memorandum dated January 17, 1992 )
C. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE
AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED.
JA lg ®or. 5 FgL
Tuesday, January 28, 1992
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers,
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, January 28,
1992, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Carolyn K. Eggert,
Chairman; Margaret C. Bowman, Vice Chairman;. Richard N. Bird; Don
C. Scurlock, Jr.; and Gary C. Wheeler. Also present were James E.
Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, Attorney to the
Board of County Commissioners; and Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order, and Commissioner
Wheeler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Chairman Eggert requested the following additions to today's
Agenda:
1. As Item 7-Q on the Consent Agenda, a proclamation
designating February 9-15, 1992 as Rockridge Week.
2. As Item 11-H-6, two subordination of utility liens.
3. As Item 13-A-2, a reminder of the first anniversary
celebration of the Main Library.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously added the
above items to today's Agenda.
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/9/92:
1
BOOK
_I
JAN 28 O
BOOK S5
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
THRU: Jack Price, Personnel Director'Y'`'�'-'z-'
FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manager
_ DATE: January 9, 1992
SUBJECT: First Quarter Safety Award - 1992
We request your consideration for inclusion on the Boards January 28, 1
agenda the presentation of the First Quarter � meeting
Safety Award.
Background
Each quarter, the Risk Management Division receives award recommendations from the
Safety Committee. The nominees, as individuals or as work groups, have demonstrated
their commitment to on-the-job safety and health through their outstanding performance.
Analysis
Staff received the First Quarter Safety Award nominations and selected Animal Control.
The attached memorandum from Nancy Errett, Animal Control Officer, detail their
meritorious efforts. In addition, the Animal Control Division has had no vehicle accidents
in 1991-1992.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the First Quarter Safety Award be presented to the Animal Control
Division.
amen E. Chandler Date
County Administrator - -
Chairman Eggert announced that the First Quarter 1992 Safety
Award is being presented to the Animal Control Division in
recognition of their outstanding safety record. In 1991, the
Division handled over 4,500 complaints. As a result of staff's
training and skill, there were no employee injuries which resulted
from animal capture. In addition, they traveled over 5,000 miles
each month and were not at fault in any traffic accidents nor did
staff receive any citations for their driving.
Chairman Eggert presented the First Quarter Safety Award to
Nancy Errett, who accepted on behalf of the Animal Control
Division.
2
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any corrections or additions
to the Minutes of the Special Meeting of December 20, 1991. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved the
Minutes of the Special Meeting of 12/20/91, as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Bowman requested that Item L be removed from the
Consent Agenda for discussion.
A. Approval of Duplicate Tax Certificate
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
the issuance of Duplicate Tax Certificate No. 0791, in
the sum of $212.44 for Rudolph F. Gipson, Sr.
COPY OF DUPLICATE TAX CERTIFICATE IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERK TO THE BOARD
B. Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the
Board:
Copy of Minutes of Quarterly Meeting of the Board of
Supervisors of Sebastian River Water Control District,
held on December 3, 1991.
3
JA N 26"1 Poor ",' '�
JAN 28 199
BOOK FA, U'
C. Semi -Annual Bond Review
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/8/92:
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
TBRU: Jack Price, Personnel Director
FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manage
DATE: 8 January 1992
BUWICCT: Semi -Annual Bond Review
Please consider this item for the Board of County Commissioners
January 28, 1992; consent„agenda.
Chapter 137.05, Florida Statutes ourequires the Board of County
Commissioners to review the bonds of County officers twice
annually. The Board last reviewed the bonds on July 21 1991.
sis
We have reviewed copies of thep
bond for each Commissioner and
Constitutional Officer and found them to be sufficient in keeping
with statutory requirements.
Following review,
Recommendation
no further action is required of the Board.
Approved for Agenda,
amen E. Chandler
County Administrator
a9- 9z
:�Gan :river Co. AvD' -';c
Dale
AIrntn.
Legal
5,jdlpl -
,9• l�,
Devi. I%-
`�• `
Risk Mgr.
D. CARL Annlication Deadline for the "Padgett Branch” Proverty
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/21/92:
4
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
49, 4&dKkfdM
Robert M. ea ng, CP
Community Developnt Director
me
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois, AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: January 21, 1992
SUBJECT: CARL Application Deadline for the "Padgett Branch"
Property
It is requested that the data presented herein be given __formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of January 28, 1992.
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS:
Last year, the County Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC)
recommended that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff
to submit an application to the State Conservation and Recreation
Lands (CARL) Program for the "Padgett Branch" property,
approximately 2,500 acres in western Indian River County. The
Board authorized the application submittal, as well as an
application for the "Oslo Riverfront" Property, a portion of which
was subsequently purchased jointly by the County and SJRWMD.
Neither of the submitted proposals survived the "first cut" review
last year at the State CARL level. However, the State Division of
Forestry has since expressed -its- support of the. .Padgett Branch
project, and the project may fare better this year.
The deadline for submitting proposals for this year is January 30,
1992. The topic of resubmittal was to be discussed at the December
LAAC meeting. However, the meeting was subsequently canceled, and
the next meeting of LAAC - January 29, 1992 - is too late from the
standpoint of application submittal timeframes.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS:
The Padgett Branch project is one of the top 10 properties ranked
by LAAC. In that LAAC and the Board approved the Padgett Branch
application submittal last year, a resubmittal of the project to
CARL would essentially be a continuation of the approved process.
Due to time constraints, if the Board is to authorize resubmittal
of the Padgett Branch property to CARL, it necessarily has to occur
prior to LAAC approval of the resubmittal.
The "emergency acquisition" section of the Land Acquisition Guide
provides that the Board may declare an emergency acquisition
situation if "an immediate opportunity exists for cost -share
purchase of critical habitat or natural resources in conjunction
with another agency." While the matter at hand is not an
5
JAN 28 1992 800K -J
J!f. +�.�.� v/' L'OtIP b
"emergency acquisition" per se, it does fall within the intent in
that there is a need for an immediate decision relating to a cost -
share opportunity.
One option would be for the Board to authorize staff to resubmit
the application, with the condition that if LAAC subsequently votes
to recommend against resubmittal, the application would be
withdrawn.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board authorize staff to resubmit an
application to the CARL program for the Padgett Branch property,
with the condition that if LAAC subsequently votes to recommend
against the submittal, the application will be withdrawn.-
ON
ithdrawn.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
staff's recommendation to resubmit an application to the
CARL program for the Padgett Branch property, with the
condition that if LAAC subsequently votes to recommend
against the submittal, the application will be withdrawn.
COPY OF APPLICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD
E. Public Nuisance Violation Austin J. Taylor
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/7/92:
TO: -James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Keatin , AI
Community Develo,went irector
THROUGH: Roland M. DeBlois"; - 7%1CP
Chief, Environmental Planning
& Code Enforcement Section
FROM: Charles W. Heath 0-404
Code Enforcement Officer
DATE: January 7, 1992
SUBJECT: Austin J. Taylor
Public Nuisance Violation
3450 13th Street
It is requested that the data presented herein be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of January 28, 1992.
6
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On April 22, 1991, Code Enforcement staff sent a Notice of Public
Nuisance to Austin J. Taylor, owner of the subject property,
concerning a hazardous public nuisance condition on the subject
property. The subject property has a legal description as follows:
Parcel No.: 10333900001007000007.0
A parcel of land 25.5 .feet by 201 feet abutting the west
side of the south 201 feet of Lot F, Vero Park
Subdivision Unit #21.an unrecorded plat.
The Respondent was cited for maintaining the property in violation
of Chapter 973.01 of the County Land Development Code, which
prohibits conditions on property that are. a health and safety
hazard to the general public, thereby being a public nuisance.
Specifically, the public nuisance was described as follows:
Dead australian pine trees that were a health and safety
hazard to the surrounding single-family residences.
The subject property was also posted as set forth in Section 973.09
of the County Code, giving the Respondent thirty (30) days to abate
the nuisance.
The nuisance violation was not abated within the required thirty
(30) day time period. Therefore, in accordance with Section
973.04(2), County Code, County Personnel (i.e., the Road & Bridge
Division) cleared the nuisance violation.
Section 973.06(1) of the County Code requires that the cost of a
County nuisance abatement action shall be calculated and reported
to the Board of County Commissioners, who, by resolution, shall
assess such costs against the subject property. This matter is
presented herein to the Board for consideration to adopt said
resolution.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
Section 973.06(1), Public Nuisances, of the Indian River --Land
Development Code specifically reads as follows:
"After abatement of a nuisance by the County, the cost
thereof to the County as to each lot, parcel or tract of
land shall be calculated and reported to the Board of
County Commissioners. Thereupon, the Board of County
Commissioners, by resolution, shall assess such costs
against such lots, parcel, or tract of land. Such
resolution shall describe the land and state the cost of
abatement, which shall include an administrative cost of
seventy-five dollars ($75.00) per lot. Such assessment
shall be legal, valid, and binding obligation upon the
property against which made until paid. The assessment
shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after the
mailing of a Notice of Assessment, after which interest
shall accrue at the rate of twelve (12) per cent per
annum on any unpaid portion thereof."
Cost for equipment use and labor, as indicated by the Road & Bridge
Division, plus the $75.00 administrative cost, calculates to be:
Labor R. & B. $ 525.12
Tree Removal: $ 41690.00
Administrative Fee: $ 75.00
Total: $ 5,290.12
7
JAN 28 1992
P0oK � Fr1�C •�.
JAN 281992
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the
proposed resolution assessing $5,290.12 in abatement cost, in
accordance with Section 973.06(1), of the Indian River County Land
Development Code.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-11, assessing $5,290.12 in abatement cost,
in accordance with Section 973.06(1) of the IRC Land
Development Code, as recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-11
A RESOLUTION OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA, ASSESSING COSTS OF COUNTY PUBLIC NUISANCE
ABATEMENT ON A PARCEL OF LAND 25.5 FEET BY 201 FEET ABUTTING THE
WEST SIDE OF 'THE SOUTH 201 FEET OF LOT F, VERO PARR SUBDIVISION
UNIT $2, AN UNRECORDED PLAT; SUCH ASSESSMENT BEING A BINDING
OBLIGATION UPON THE PROPERTY UNTIL PAID.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has determined that the regulation of the accumulation of
weeds, junk, trash, debris, and other noxious substances or
materials is in the public interest and necessary for the health,
safety, and welfare of the citizens of Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 973, "Public Nuisance," of the County Land
Development Code defines as a public nuisance noxious substances or
materials which might tend to be a fire hazard or other health
hazard, or which is considered to be obnoxious and a nuisance to
the general public; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has determined that landowners are responsible for abating
public nuisances existing on their property; and
WHEREAS,. Austin J. Taylor has been identified as the owner of
the subject property described herein; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Nuisance calling for the abatement
of the described nuisance was sent to the owner by certified mail,
and notice was posted on the subject property for 30 days, in
accordance with Section 973.09 "Serving of Notice," of the County
Public Nuisance Ordinance, and Notice which was published in the
Vero Beach Press Journal on April 22, April 29, May 6, & May 13,
1991, and
WHEREAS, the landowner of the subject property, failed to abate
the described nuisance within 30 day of the posted, mailed and
published notice; and
WHEREAS, Section 973.04(2) of the Public Nuisance Ordinance
authorizes County personnel to abate a public nuisance if the
nuisance is not abated by the landowner within 30 days of notice;
and
WHEREAS, as of September 26, 1991, the County Road and Bridge
Division has abated the herein described public nuisance, in
accordance with Section 973.04(2), of the County Public Nuisance
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Section 973.06 of the County Public Nuisance
Ordinance providesthat, after abatement of a nuisance by the
County, the'cost thereof shall be calculated and reported to the
Board of County Commissioners; thereupon the Board, by resolution,
shall assess such costs against the subject property, such costs to
include an administrative fee of seventy-five dollars ($75.00) per
lot; and
WHEREAS, the total cost of equipment use, labor, and
administrative fee for County abatement of the herein described
nuisance is determined to be $5,290.12; and
9
Puff E; ,
JAN' 28 1992
�JAH 2S 1992
QOOK itd F'1L� •.�
WHEREAS, Section 973.06 of the County Public Nuisance
Ordinance provides that the assessment shall be due and payable
thirty (30) days after the mailing of a notice of assessment,
whereby if the owner fails to pay assessed cost within the thirty
(30) days, a certified copy of the assessment shall be recorded in
,the official record books of the County, constituting a lien
against the property, subject to twelve (12) percent annum
interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
1) The foregoing recitals are adopted and ratified in their
entirety.
2) The costs of county abatement of the herein described
nuisance, totaling an amount of $5,290.12, is hereby
.assessed against the parcel of land 25.5 feet by 201
abutting the west side of the south 201 feet of Lot F,
Vero Park Subdivision Unit #2, an unrecorded plat, whose
last known owner was Austin J. Taylor, 311 North Crescent
Drive, Melbourne, Florida 32901.
3) The $5,290.12 assessment shall be due and payable to the
Board of County Commissioners thirty (30) days after the
mailing of a Notice of Assessment to the landowners,
after which,*if unpaid, and is no hearing is requested,
a certified copy of the assessment shall be recorded in
the official record books of the described property,
subject to twelve (12) percent per annum interest.
THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner Scurlock ,
seconded by Commissioner -Wheeler , and adopted on the
28 day of Januar , 1992, by the following vote:
Commissioner Carolyn Eggert Aye
Commissioner Margaret Bowman Aye
Commissioner Richard -N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, -Jr. lye
Commissioner Gary Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 28 day of January , 1992.
Ohl • 70, �a
TEST.',� 't
%1 t e rk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
/e P.4.-zx,�
- d:�.
Carolyn. Eggert
Chairmary ad
chili FJVtf Cd Approved pate
Admin.
Leval
Budget
Dept
10 Risk Mgr.
F. Release of Easement - Garden of Eden Subdivision - Tommy L and
Essie M. Turner
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/13/92:
TO: 'flames=E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
OW
Aobet M. Keati44, A
Community Devel pmen Director
THROUGH: Roland M. DeBlois;-*AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
& Code Enforcement
FROM: Charles W. Heath
Code Enforcement Officer
DATE: January 13, 1992
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF EASEMENT REQUEST BY:
Tommy L. and Essie M. Turner
Lot 4 & 5, Block, C, Garden of
Eden Subdivision
It is requested that the data herein be given formal consideration
by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular meeting of
January 28, 1992.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
a The County has been petitioned by Tommy L. and Essie M. Turner,
owners of the subject property, for the release of'the common five
(5) foot side lot utility and drainage easements of Lots 4 & 5,
Block C, Garden of Eden Subdivision. It is the petitioners'
intention to construct a single-family residence on the subject
property.
The current zoning classification of the subject property is RM -10,
Multi -Family Residential District=: The Land Use designation is M-
2, allowing up to ten (10) units per acre..
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS:
The request has been reviewed by Southern Bell Telephone Company,
City of Vero Beach Power Company, United Artists Cable Corporation,
the Indian.River County Utilities Department and the Road & Bridge
and Engineering Divisions. Based upon their reviews, there would
be no adverse impact to utilities being supplied to the subject
property.'
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends to the Board, through the adoption of a
resolution, the release of the common five (5) foot side lot
utility and.'drainage easements of Lots 4 & 5, Block C, Garden of
Eden Subdivision, being the easterly five (5) feet of Lot 4, and
the westerly five (5) feet of Lot 5, according to the plat thereof
as recorded -in Plat Book 4, Page 36 of the Public Records of Indian
River County, Florida.
it
.J 8 19S",2PooK P ti
FF- -1
RANI 1114 9
a0C'KFn�E 1J9Vol
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-12, releasing the common five foot side lot
utility and drainage easements of Lots 4 & 5, Block C,
Garden of Eden Subdivision, as recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-12
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ABANDONING
CERTAIN EASEMENTS IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN SUBDIVISION, LOTS
4 & 5, BLOCK C, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 36 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
and WHEREAS, Indian River County has easements as described below,
WHEREAS, the retention of those easements serves no public
purpose,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that:
This release of easement is executed by Indian River County,
Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose
mailing address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960,
Grantor, to Tommy Lee Turner and Essie M. Turner, his wife, their
successors in interest, heirs and assigns, whose mailing address is
4660 30th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida 32967 Grantee, as follows:
Indian River County does hereby abandon all right, title, and
interest that it may have in the following described easements:
The common five (5) foot side lot utility and drainage
easements of Lots 4 & 5, Block C, Garden of Eden Subdivision,
being the easterly five (5) feet of Lot 4, and the westerly
five (5) feet of Lot 5, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 36 of
the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Scurlock , seconded by Commissioner Wheeler
and adopted on the 28 day of January , 1992, by the
following vote:
12
RESOLUTION NO. 92-12
Commissioner Carolyn R. Eggert Ayp
Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Ayp
Commissioner Richard N. Bird _yp
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler _yp
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. AMP
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this Z8 , day of January , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS.
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
BY /C'-/
Carolyff R. Egger
airman
AN r91R s7R/P
G. Extension of Site Plan Approval for - Evans
Properties, Inc.
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/92:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIV ION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
-Robert . ReatinAI
Community DeevA
elo�men irector
THROUGH: Stan BolingICP
Planning Director
FROM: Christopher D. Rison �i`
Staff Planner, Current Development
DATE: January 20, 1992
SUBJECT: Evans Properties, Inc. Is Request for an Extension of Site
Plan Approval for HN f1i�Q5 eP��
SP -MA -90-10-63 HN f1
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of January 28, 1992.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On December 4, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners approved a
minor site plan. and special exception use application submitted by
= Evans Properties, Inc. Approval was given to recognize an existing
airstrip located 10 miles west of Interstate -95, 3.5 miles south of
S.R. 60 and 2.5 miles north of the Florida Turnpike.
13
BOOK
JAN 28 1992
JAN 2'& 0"
HOK 8
Evans Properties, Inc. has requested that a site plan extension be
granted. Due to permitting delays, Evans Properties has been
unable to accomplish formal establishment and release of the
approved site plan. The original site plan approval for the
project formally expired on December 4, 1991; however, the request
for site plan extension was received prior to expiration of the
approved site plan.
The County adopted and implemented its new Land Development
Regulations in September of 1990. While some regulations have
changed, the changes are not significant enough to warrant
revisions to the project's design if it were reviewed as a new
application today. The members of the Technical Review Committee
(TRC) concur that the LDR changes that have occurred since the
initial project review and approval are not significant enough to
require any site plan revisions.
Evans Properties, Inc. is requesting a full one (1) year extension
of the approved site plan. As this request for site plan extension
was received prior to expiration of the approved site plan, the
Board may grant, or grant with additional conditions, the requested
site plan extension pursuant to the site plan ordinance. In
staff's opinion, the current subject site plan application would
substantially conform to current requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board oCCounty Commissioners approve of
the Evans Properties, Inc.'s request for a one (1) year extension
for the approved airstrip and special excdPtion use. The new site
plan expiration date will be December 4, 1992.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously granted
a one (1) year extension for the approved airstrip
and special exception use; the new site plan
expiration date being December 4, 1992, as recommended
by staff.
H. Extension of - Preliminary Plat Approval - Colonial Gardens
Subdivision. Unit 2
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/91:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MEMORA-NDUN
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Robert M. Reati g, P
Community Deve opme Director
THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP
Planning Director
FROM: Christopher D. Rison Ovg--
Staff Planner, Current Development
14
M M M
DATE: January 20, 1992
SUBJECT: Vero Building Corporation's Request for Extension of the
Colonial Gardens Subdivision, Unit 21 Preliminary Plat
Approval
SD -90-08-11
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of January 28, 1992.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
On June 28, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission conditionally
approved a preliminary plat application submitted,by.Peterson and
Votapka, Inc., on behalf of the Vero Building Corporation, for the
Colonial Gardens Subdivision, Unit 2. Colonial Gardens
Subdivision, Unit 2, is a 43 lot single-family residential
subdivision located at the 1050 block of 9th Street, lying
immediately south of the Ridgewood Subdivision, west of Old Dixie
Highway, and directly north of the Colonial Gardens Subdivision,
Unit 1.
Peterson and Votapka, Inc., on behalf of the Vero Building
Corporation, has requested that a preliminary, plat extension be
granted. Due to permitting delays and financial conditions, the
applicant has been unable to commence construction of the approved
preliminary plat. The original preliminary plat approval for the
project formally expired on December 28,-1991; however, the request
for preliminary plat extension was received prior to expiration of
the approved preliminary plat.
The County adopted and implemented its new Land Development
Regulations (LDR's) in September of 1990. While some regulations
have changed, the changes are not significant enough to warrant
revisions to the project's design if it were reviewed as a new
application today. The members of the Technical Review Committee
(TRC) concur that the LDR changes that have occurred since the
initial project review and approval are not significant enough to
require any preliminary plat revisions.
aero Building Corporation is requesting a preliminary plat
pproval extension pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision
and Plats Ordinance, Chapter 913. Pursuant to the Subdivision and
Plats Ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners may grant, or
grant with conditions, the requested preliminary plat extension. In
staff 1.s opinion, the existing, approved preliminary
application would substantially conform to current-requir entlat
s.
RECOlMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the
Vero Building Corporation's request for a one (1) time, eighteen
(18) month extension of the Colonial Gardens Subdivision, Unit 2,
Preliminary plat. The new preliminary plat expiration date will be
June 28, 1993.
15
JAN 28 199
JAW, 2819 2
BOOK Ci� PALt t��
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner wheeler, the Board unanimously granted a
one-time, 18 -month extension of the Colonial Gardens
Subdivision, Unit 2, preliminary plat; the new
preliminary plat expiration date being June 28, 1993.
I. Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant Progress Report &
Reimbursement Invoice
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/9/92:
TO: James E. Chaindler
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE
ell
Obert M. i e t g, P
THROUGH: Sasan Rohani S.t
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: Christy Fischer
Staff Planner, Long -Range Planning
DATE: January 9, 1992
SUBJECT: TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED PLANNING GRANT PROGRESS
REPORT & REIMBURSEMENT INVOICE
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of January 28, 1992.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On May S. 1990, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved
the transmittal of the county's application to the state to become
the local Designated Official Planning Agency (DOPA) for the
provision of transportation disadvantaged planning activities in
the area. In its capacity as the DOPA, the Board of County
Commissioners is responsible for coordinating transportation
disadvantaged resources in the county.
On August 28, 1990, The HCC/DOPA approved the= :transmittal of a
Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant application to the
state. The Planning Grant was subsequently executed by the state
and the BCC/DOPA on November 27, 1990.
As part of the Transportation Disadvantaged Planning Grant contract
between the DOPA and the State of Florida Transportation
Disadvantaged Commission (TDC), quarterly progress reports and
reimbursement invoices must be submitted to the TDC for their
0 I
� � i
review. To comply with the TDC's requirement of submitting
quarterly progress reports and invoices, staff has prepared a
progress report and invoice for the June 1, 1991 to December 31,
1991 period. Since the executed 1990/1991 contract has been
extended by the TDC, the quarterly periods identified in the grant
are no longer applicable. With this submission, however, the 1990-
1991 planning grant reporting requirements will be up to date.
As of this time, the Transportation Disadvantaged Commission has
approved the first and second quarter progress reports and has
reimbursed the DOPA based upon the previously submitted invoices.
The second quarter progress report and invoice was for the March 1
to May 31, 1991 period. Since the original grant contract was
approved with a June 30, 1991 expiration date, several extensions
have been approved by the Transportation Disadvantaged Commission.
The present and final expiration date is March 31, 1992.
On January 16, 1991, the Transportation Disadvantaged Local
Coordinating Board (TDLCB) reviewed and approved the attached
progress report and invoice. At that time, the TDLCB recommended
that the Board of County Commissioners, in its capacity as the
transportation disadvantaged progiam DOPA, approve- the attached
progress report and invoice and forward these to the TDC.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Attached is a copy of the progress report and invoice summaries,
along with a brief narrative describing the status of each task for
the June 1, 1991 to December 31, 1991 period.
Finished products, such as TDLCB meeting minutes, by-laws, and
reports, are required to accompany all reimbursement invoices.
These materials will be submitted to the state along with the
reimbursement invoice and the progress report.
The BCC/DOPA's alternatives are either to approve the transmittal
of the Progress Report and reimbursement invoice as submitted, to
approve transmittal of the Progress Report and invoices with
revisions, or to deny the transmittal of the Progress Report and
reimbursement invoice to the state.
RECOMMENDATION
The TDLCB and the staff recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners/DOPA approve the Progress Report and reimbursement
invoice, and direct staff to transmit the report and the invoice to
the State of Florida Transportation Disadvantaged Commission.
17
JA 11 '�9
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
the Progress Report and reimbursement invoice, and
directed staff to transmit the report and the invoice
to the Florida Transportation Disadvantaged Commission,
as recommended by staff.
COPIES OF REPORT AND INVOICE ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK
TO THE BOARD
J. Floodplain Cut & Fill Balance Waiver - Vero Lake Estates
Donald & Mary -Ann Page
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/17/92:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator C
THROUGH: James.W. Davis, P.EL�
Public Works Directo
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E
County Engineer
FROM: David B. Cox, P.E j.448WC,.-
Civil Engineer -
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for
Donald and Mary -Ann Page Residence, Lot 4, Block 17, Vero
Lake Estates, Unit 3, 8205 92nd Avenue
REFERENCE: Building Permit No. 91100129
DATE: January 17, 1992 CONSENT AGENDA
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
A Type C Flood Management System Permit was issued by the
Engineering Division for the subject single family detached
residence on November 4, 1991. A cut and fill balance was to be
provided for in the rear of the lot by a proposed floodplain
retention area 115 FT. long by 50 FT. wide by 18 inches deep. The
building permit was issued on November 6, 1991. In the attached
letter dated December 19, 1991 the contractor has requested the
Board to grant a cut and fill balance waiver. A revised lot
grading plan has been submitted to eliminate the rear lot retention
area if the waiver is granted.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet
the criteria of Section 930.07(2)td,)4. of the Stormwater Management
and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots over 1.0 acres located in
the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit. This waiver
criteria was adopted by the Board on December 4, 1991 as part of
18
the-L.D.R. amendments included in Ordinance No. 91-48. Prior to
adoption of Ordinance No. 91-48, the threshold for requiring the
cut and fill balance was one-half acre. The amount of floodplain
displacement created by the revised lot grading plan is
approximately 266 cubic yards. It appears the revised plan dated
December 19, 1991 will meet all other requirements of the
Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance and will not
create a material adverse impact on flood protection.
Alternative No. 1 - Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on
the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)4.
Alternative No. 2 - Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on
site retention area be provided to compensate for the proposed
floodplain displacement.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the revised lot grading plan dated December 19, 1991,
staff recommends Alternative No. 1.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
staff's recommendation of Alternative No. 1, granting
the cut and fill balance waiver based on criteria of
Section 930.07(2)(d)4 and the revised lot grading plan
dated 12/ 19 / 91.
K. IRC Bid #92-49 - Typewriter Maintenance Contract
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/92:
DATE: January 20, 1992
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Services
9
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manage -e
SUBJECT: IRC Bid #92-49/Typewriter Maintenance Contract
County Wide Annual Contract
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: -
Bid Opening Date:
Specifications mailed to:
Replies:
December 18, 1991
Twelve (12) Vendors
Four (4) Vendors
Two "No Bid" Responses
E9:1
E3
7 �l
iU(1K. r,?uC 3 i
F,
JAN 28 1992
VENDOR
Remex North
Ft Pierce, Florida
Danka Business Machines
Ft Pierce, Florida
Office Products & Services
Ft Pierce, Florida
Omni Business Systems
Melbourne, Florida
BOOK F';.EE -J
BID TABULATIONS
Please See Attached
Tab Sheet
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID: 3,745.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Remex North as the
overall lowest, most responsible and responsive bidder. Staff
recommends the award of an Open End Contract. Also, authorize
Purchasing Manager to renew the contract subject to satisfactory
performance, zero cost increase, vendor acceptance, and the
determination that renewal is in the best interest of the County.
The initial contract period shall begin on the date of award.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
IRC Bid #92-49 to Remex North in the amount of $3,745, as
set out in the above staff recommendation.
eoano os eMUNrr
— •-o — MC4.., -R — .eea i p=I —
I I I
V
I I I I I
"� �•s l
,e.o am ma
Yer. ena, Flmaa 77Bm .
11 a zzo I
��ti
h h
Qj � y • � 9
." sTrter E 19a
Cd � 1 ' I I I I I I I
wr mo to
V��hv�,��`Fj�
8 I I I I I
BID TABULATION
T F-� D. 0 I
IOd Od I I I I I I I I
ew.ma oil
NMI
49I I I I I
`" bo
.39 �
I I I I •I I I I� i t I I I
1
l�
I oD uo ,D
p
II I
S -110d11 '
EL ITE
s35M
IMMII I I
p
11
bI I
I I I I
.o
I I I I
I
Ii
meinq
16°d .I ►wwwl0 e1I�
I V,..,I NO6i*
I
I 39
I s l I I I '1 1 1'
i
/1
..
139
WgbD I I 9IO�I I
I
-sno3gI
(Oft I I I I I I
I
s
391
I
S5o
i 39
f I
sm
491
IV M
sIa
I 491tn 69
B3O
I I
Rftdsom
if. KXe- 7o
3q
b�
MQD4L C EIEC 59
TM wod9310Nom 'H
�� . •�/
414ULATION w �+�' .k 1(• !j J, W . • . .
Mare OF Ovow M
x " — I
ft O i E So6El
— •-o — MC4.., -R — .eea i p=I —
I I I
m 1 PecG
I I I I I
"� �•s l
I I I I
11 a zzo I
�F9I I I I I I
." sTrter E 19a
Cd � 1 ' I I I I I I I
wr mo to
Mom&oo I
8 I I I I I
I
T F-� D. 0 I
IOd Od I I I I I I I I
-I
49I I I I I
`" bo
.39 �
I I I I •I I I I� i t I I I
_I
L. IRC Bid #92-76 - Surplus Sale.#2
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/92:
DATE: January 20, 1992
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY OOMaSSICHM
THRU: James E. QmnAler, County Mimi strator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Dir=C30A
Department of General
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manager' V/
SUBJ: IRC Bid #92-76/Surplus Sale #2 1
BACKG OUND:
The following equipment (attached sheet) has been declared surplus to
the needs of Indian River County.
ANALYSIS:
Staff recamends that authority be granted by the Board of County
Cmmissioners to declare the above surplus and authorize its sale.
FUMING:
The monies received from this sale will be returned to the appropriate
accounts.
',1� � ��u�41a1�1� : it •��
This will be placed on the Surplus Property Sale open to the public as
per State Statutes.
Commissioner Bowman inquired about the procedures of a surplus
sale and if it was advertised, and General Services Director Sonny
Dean explained that the time and place of the sale is advertised.
Usually these sales are held in the Purchasing warehouse, but this
time it probably will be held in the old Health Department Building
because we have such a large amount of items stored there.
Commissioner Scurlock understood then that before this goes to
public sale, notification is given to all County departments to see
if they can use any of the items.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
staff recommendation that the property listed below
be declared surplus and sold at a surplus property
sale open to the public as per State Statutes.
21
PROGRAM **FIXRP0037** * FIXED ASSETS BY LOCATION SELECTED DATE 1/17/92 TIME 9:21105
* PURCH. - * PAGE 1
00
ASSET* SEGO CLASS DESCRIPTION/ DESCRIPTION/ LAST INV.DATE AQ. DATE HOW CHO DATE FUNCTION
FLEET 0 MANUFACTURER YEAR COMMENT ASSET VALUE I.D. 0
************************************************************************************************************************************
J'a+3
6005 PURCH. - ENTERPRISE SURPLUS
************************************************************************************************************************************
*+�
002658-000010 TRUCKS / FLATBED
1975 DODGE D900 DIESEL TRNSPT
6/04/91
3/14/90
T
01/16/92
999
**
FL9103 DODGE
.1975
FR 6015
5.000.00
N91HZ5T001286
'
**
003134-000000 TRUCKS / 1/2 TON
1/2 TON FORD PU
6/04/91
12/20/78
P
01/16/92
999
+�*
FL#024 FORD
1979
FR 6015
2.608.84
FlOHNDKO579
**
003379-000010 TRUCKS / MULTI -TON
1978 FORD F700 W/BOX VAN BDY
6/04/91
3/14/90
T
01/16/92
999
**
FLO140 FORD
1978
FR 6015
1.200.00
F70EVA08506
**
007862-000010 HVY EQP/ HVY DTY TRANSPORT TRA
1985 INTSTATE.35GHBR F/B TRLR
6/04/91
3/14/90
T
01/16/92
999
**
.FLO296 INTERSTATE
1985
FR 6015
6.000.00
JKDDGN280FT350025
+�
008450-000000 AUTOMOBILE / 4 WHEEL DR.
1986 FORD RANGER 4X4 4/WD
8/06/91
3/11/86
P
01/16/92
999
e�*
FLO303 FORD
1986
FR 6055
9.286.00
1FTCR11TBGUB83163
*+�
009172-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
IBM DISPLAY STATION
8/06/91
3/16/87
P
01/16/92
999
*+�
FLO IBM
1987
FR 6050
777.00
K8319
N **
009176-000000 EDP EQUIP./ PRINTERS A ACCESS.
IBM 400 CPS P51NTF-R
8/06/91
3/25/87
P
01/16/92
999
N **
FLO IBM
1987
FR 6050
4.033.50
4224-02 0033979
**
009263-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE 1 CRT DISPLAY STATION
8/06/91
7/21/87
P
01/16/92
999
*
FLO IBIMAINT USA
1987
FR 6050
682.00
000193
**
009264-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE 1 CRT DISPLAY STATION
8/06/91
8/13/87
P
01/16/92
999
*
FLi+ IBIMAINT USA
1987
FR 6050
682.00
000057
*+�
00.9265-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE 1 CRT DISPLAY STATION
8/06/91
7/21/87
P
01/16/92
999
**
FLO IBIMAINT USA
1987
FR 6050
682.00
000156 (COUNTY ENG)
**
009266-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE 1 CRT, DISPLAY STATION
8/06/91
7/21/87
P
01/16/92
999
**
FLO ISIMAINT USA
1987
FR 6050
682.00
000202 (ENV HEALTH)
**
010185-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
WYSE CRT AND KEYBOARD
8/06/91
12/19/88
P
01/16/92
999 ry
**
FLO WYSE
1988
FR 6050
399.00
0
o
LOCATION TOTAL VALUE---- 32032.34
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS------ 12
s�
c-
m
k
Vis.,
1
fl
1
PROGRAM **FIXRPG037*aa**at*******x**
*
*
DATE
1/17/92 TIME
9120:46
*EE*********************
AAAA
PAGE 1
ASSET@ SEQdA CLASS DESCRIPTION/
FLEET 0 DESCRIPTION/
MANUFACTURER YEAR
********N********************************!F*************************K*************************ASSET*VALUE*******************N***ON
LAST INV.DATE AQCOMMENT. DATE HOW CHG DATE
ASSET
VALUE
I.D. 0
**
1215 PURCHASING OFA
ifi6UEUUUTUU*LUES*UU*VU*VE*EEEVi:ULULUV*EUEAE**AEE+x•U*iF14EUL*UTUU*EAE*LELUVUSURPLUS
L* 600110-000000 OFFICE EQUIP./ TYPEWRITER
VEL*VAU***LELLL*VU**UUUU **EEA*EEE*M1FU*EAU*UUUUUU**ULUUULLUU
L* FLO IBM TYPEWRITER
IPM
7/12/90
1974 FR 1350
0/00/00
00/00/00
513
** 000211-000000 POWER TOOLS / GENERATOR '
621.00
2453804
E* FL4144 ONAN 1961 GENERATOR W/TRAILER
1961 FROM 1120
4/18/91
O/00/00 P
11%26/91
E* 000376-000000 FURNITURE / DESK
2.074.00
MOlIC652561
513
** FLO UNKNOWN OAK DESK
1900 FR 1230
4/09/91
8/18/59 X
08/30/91
*U 001387-000000 OFFICE EQUIP./ TYPEWRITER200.00
NONE
513
** ,FL's IBM IPM SELECTRIC
1974 FR 1752
10/10/89
0/00/00 P
08/30/91
** 001704-000000 HVY. EQPT / SELF-POWERED '
649.00
2195652
513
+F+f FLO063 1974 REX ROLLER 4/6 'i'41N
1974 FR 1390
5/12/90
12/05/73 P
06/28/91
** 001761-000000 TRUCKS / 1 TON
90540.00
H0482 (PET. PAV)
513
** FLO100 GENERAL MOTORS 1975 CHEV C30 W/HOMEMADE BDY
1975 FROM 1420
4/25/91
0/00/00 X
11/26/91
*L 002018--000000 OFFICE EQUIP./ TYPEWRITER
4.794.19
CCY335A123656
513
N
W
** FLO IBM IBM SELECTRIC*
1973 FR 1350 P.513
7/12/90
11/21/73 P
00/00/00
** 002576-000000 TRUCKS / FIRE
621.00
2281470
•
FLOINTERNATIONAL 1972 INTIL FIRE TRUCK
** � 1972 FR 1275
1/29/90
3/08/72 P
01/31/91
*E 003108-000000 OFFICE EQUIP./ TYPEWRITER
6.500.00
14672ON245997
513
TYPEWRITER
** FLO-f IBM 1978 FR 1550
4/10/90
9/29/78 P
02/28/91
EE 003320-000000 EDP EQUIP-/ DISPLAY STA./CRT
774.00
6001180
513
IBM DISPLAY ST
STATION ** F-* IBM 1979 FR 1710
1/23/91
5/09/79 P
11/13/91
** 003464-000010 TRUCKS / 1/2 TON
2.675.00
28086
513
** FLO142 NISSAN (USED)1979 NISSAN HL620 L/B
1979 FROM 1120
4/18/91
8/29/86 P
11/26/91
LL 003417- 000000 AUTOMOBILE / ST. WAGON
2. 500.00
HL.B620450916
513
o
1979 DOO
EE FL4i43 DODGE ASkN WAGON
DODGE 1979 FR 1382
4/11/91
11/16/79 P
11/13/91
** 003593-000000 REPROD. / MICRO-VIEW/READ/PRNT
5.789.00
513
STARVUE READER PRINTER
LL FLO EASTMAN KODAK 1979 FROM 1520
6/28/91
6/28/91
9/30/79 P
11/26/91
�.
EE 003647-000000 COMMUNICATION / RADIO-MOBILE
3.609.00
8346
513
T
2 WAY REPEATER
** FLO GENERAL ELECTRIC 1980 FR 1130
7/20/90
10/03/80 P
08/30/91
003758 -000000 COMMUNICATION / RADIO-RECEIVER
3.846.00
0184676
513 .
r�
** FLO - REGENCY REGENCY ALERT RECEIVER
1981 FR 1130
7/20/90
4/15/81 P
08/30/91
513
L�
SNE 004104-000000 FURNITURE / DESK
200.00
25BA01561
** FLO -- STEELCASE DESK RH RETURN
1981 FR 1230
4/09/91
5/05/81 P
08/30/91
342.04
NONE
513
1
fl
1
PROGRAM
*NFIXRPG037*0
FIXED
ASSETS BY LOCATION SELECTED
a►
DATE
1/17/92 TIME 9120146
*
PURCHASING — GFA SURPLUS
PAGE
2
w�a**ataoo�+ax a�eaarotac*�a�aa�**�a*�a�a
01)
ASSET# SEGO
CLASS DESCRIPTION/
DESCRIPTION/ LAST INV.DATE
AQ. DATE
HOW
CHO DATE FUNCTION
FLEET #
MANUFACTURER
YEAR
COMMENT
ASSET VALUE
I.D. #
+t+►+�x���**�c�*i►*���*��*x�t+►,��**mow*��������ac**mat+t��ai�*�c��*�+�*�cat���*+����+f�*�*�t�o�a�**aa�x
�*+t+�+�+t*�**�r���t��+�a���►�,�**�a�t�t**��t�t�t�+�x*�**+����x��*+F+c�c
�'
1215
PURCHASING — GFA SURPLUS
��*��r�*�**���t*�*�*�aaw�+t����
�+�����t*�+a��+c*�u�����+�e��aa��ai*�ca�*ate*�+��c�**�c�+��r�c���*� ��aac�e **+����
�c*�*�a+���*��*+t��x�o���c�+����►��c+t��*�w���tx��c��+t����
*+�
004187-000000
FURNITURE / DESK
DESK RH RETURN
1/25/91
:5/05/81
P
09/30/91
513
FL# STEELCASE
1981
FR 1220
342.04
NONE
'
*+'
004626-000000
FURNITURE / DESK
DESK
6/28/91
3/16/82
P
11%26/91
813
81M
FL# HON
1982
FROM 1520
369.90
at+t
004774-000000
COMMUNICATION / RADIO—MOBILE
2 METER TRANSCEIVER
6/11/91
5/04/83
P
09/26/91
513
FL# ICOM
1983
FR 1130
289.00
16418
*+�
004954-000000
COMMUNICATION / RADIO—MOBILE
MOBILE TRANSCEIVER
6/11/91
10/20/83
P
09/26/91
513
+�
.FL# YAESU MUSEN
1983
FR 1130
371.70
1CO92265
004927-000000
EDP EQUIP./ MONITOR
COMPUTER MONITOR 13" 1
4/09/91
12/19/83
P
02/29/91
513
FL# DEC
1983
FR 1260
961.25
Y31-006195
*+�
004928--000000
EDP EQUIP./ CPU
CPU DEC
4/09/91
12/19/83
P
02/28/91
513
FL# DEC
1983
FR 1260
4.044.52
WF34557
*+�
004929-000000
TRUCKS / 1/2 TON
1983 FORD 1/2 TON P.U.
3/20/90
2/27/84
P
08/30/91
513
N
FL#006 FORD
1983
FR 1140
8.400.00
IFTCF1046MA13998
.P
004929-000010
TRUCK / SPEC. MOUNTOD ACCESS./
FABRICATED CAP FOR PICK UP
3/20/90
6/01/67
P
08/30/91
513
+�
FL# THURMAN•S
1987
AFFIXED TO #4929 FR 1140
338.00
NONE
004941-000010
AUTOMOBILE / SEDAN
1984 4 DR CHEV CITATION II
4/18/91
1/12/99
P
11/26/91
:513
*
FL0248 GENERAL MOTORS
1984
FROM 1120
1.500.00
101AX68X9ET133696
+'
007107-000000
FURNITURE / DESK
DESK
6/21/90
7/12/84
P
08/30/91
513
FL#
1984
FR 1640 NO TAG AT OLD H/D—LIB
309.00
29-36750D
+t+t
007189-000000
COMMUNICATION / RADIO—HANDHELD
HANDHELD VHF 41TH CHARGER
6/11/91
9/10/84
P
09/26/91
813
+�
FL# REGENCY
1984
FR 1130 !
446.73
MCPH606A65042
+�
007281-000010
EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
IBM DISPLAY STATION
0/00/00
10/01/90
P
08/30/91
513
0
+�
FL# IBM
1984
FR 1710
.00
E5625
007388-000000
EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
DISPLAY STATION
1/23/91
12/12/84
P
08/30/91
513
*+�
FL# IBM
1984
FR 1710
1.738.00
91 G 4151
007398-000000
TRUCKS / 1/2 TON
1985 FORD BRONCO 4X4 4/WD
7/18/90
11/02/84
P
12/30/90
8137
+�*
FL#274 FORD
1985
FROM 1500
14.000.40
IFMAU15YOFLA27307
*�
007419-000000
COMMUNICATION / RADIO—RECEIVER
BEARCAT SCAMMER
7/20/90
12/19/84
P
08/30/91
513
FL# UNIDEN
1984
FR 1130
346.00
67058
T�
*
007498-000000
EDP EQUIP./ PC—AT SYSTEM
IBM PCJR SYSTEM
7/20/90
2/11/85
P
08/30/91
513
+�+►
FL# IBM
1984
FR 1130 AT DATA PROC
916.39
00670026425
1
1
1
PROGRAM **FIXRPGO37**
FIXED
ASSETS BY LOCATION SELECTED
DATE
1/17/92 TIME 9220246
*
PURCHASING - GFA SURPLUS
*
PAGE
3
***************************************
A8SET4 SEGO CLASS DESCRIPTION/
FLEET 4 MANUFACTURER
DESCRIPTION/ LAST INV.DATE
AQ, DATE
HOW
CHO DATE FUNCTION
YEAR
COMMENT ASSET VALUE I.D. 4
i
1215
PURCHASING - OFA SURPLUS
**
007498-000010 EDP EQUIP./(UPGRADES)(EXPANSIO
BASIC. FILE.PRINTER PORT/CABLE
7/20/90
5/02/85
P 06/30/91 513
**
i
FI -0 IBM
1985
ADDED TO 7498 FR 1130
i
345.95
**
007498-000020 EDP EQUIP./(UPORADES)(EXPANSIO
MEMORY EXPANSION ATT FOR PC►JR
7/20/90
3/03/86
P
obi 30/91
513 '
**
FL4 IBM
1985
ADDED TO 07498 FR 1130
159.00
PART 44860/0031
**
007674-000000 TRUCKS / 1/2 TON
1985 DODGE D150
6/04/90
5/09/85
P
01/31/91
513
*
FL4287 DODGE
1985
FR 1370
6.888.30
iB7FD14H6FS663476
.
*+�
i, **
008109-000000 FURNITURE / DESK
30 X 60 WOOD DESK
4/09/91
11/26/85
P
08/30/91
513
•FL4 PRIDE
1985
FR 1230
250.00
**
008460-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
IBM DISPLAY STATION/FREIGHT
1/23/91
3/01/86
P
08/30/91
513
**
FL4 IBM
1985
FR 1710
1.053.00
5291 EF087
**
008488-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
IBM DISPLAY STATION/FREIGHT
1/23/91
3/01/86
P
08/30/91
513
*+�
a
FL4 IBM
1985
FR 1710
'
1.053.00
5291 EF091
**
008709-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
MEMOREX 2190 GRT
1/23/91
9/09/86
P
08/30/91
513
bi
*+�
FL4 MEMOREX
1986
FR 1710 r
625.00
2191-6686
**
**
008740-000000 FURNITURE / MISC.
FLO
DIVIDER PANEL. MOD. D86072
2/21/90
3/11/86
P
11/26/91
513
1985
FR 1600 TO 1300 BACK TO 1215
675.00
**
008741-000000 FURNITURE / MISC.
DIVIDER PANEL. MOD. D86072
2/21/90
3/11/86
P
11/26/91
513
**
FLOO
1985
FR 1600 TO 1300 BACK TO 1215
675.00
**
008808-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
MEMOREX 2191 CRT
1/23/91
9/09/86
P
08/30/91
513
**
lIj*+'
FL4 MEMOREX
1986
FR 1710
625.00
18533
008983-000000 FURNITURE / MISC.
16 FT FRONT DESK UNIT
6/21/90
3/10/87
G
08/30/91
513
**
FL4
1900
CUSTOM BUILT 6TILL AT LIB
1.000.00
NONE
��
009193-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE 1 WORK STATION
1/23/91
8/14/87
P
08/30/91
513
**
FL4 IBIMAINT
1987
FR 1710
682.0014
000152
*+�
009250-000000 COMMUNICATION / ACCESSORIES
NWS/AT&T EQUIPMENT UPORADE
7/20/90
3/01/87
P
08/30/91
513
**
FL4 AT&T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
1967
FR 1130
2.266.00
115396.710
**
009291-000000 COMMUNICATION / RADIO -HANDHELD
03 4 WATT MPI PORT RADIO 2 CHN
6/11/91
8/04/87
P
09/26/91
513
+�*
FL4 GENERAL ELECTRIC
1987
FR 1130
746.00
448708652
zp
=;
**
`
009433-000000 EDP EQUIP./ DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE 1 WORK STATION
1/23/91
8/14/87
P
08/30/91
513
*+�
FL4 IBIMAINT
1987
FR 1710
682.00
00238
009476-000000 COMMUNICATION / RADIO
-MOBILE
PHOENIX MOBILE RADIO
6/26/91
9/09/87
P
09/26/9
6/9 1
513
+�*
FL4 - GENERAL ELECTRIC
1987
FR 1130
715.00
68/2018
1
1
1
iFlo9fj:�HF]i�i1i9F9Fi49EiiiE9FiFIFJF�i Ii9FiHf iFiFiFiF�i9Fiiaf K+16IHijfiFiF
PROGRAM **FIXRP0037** * FIXED ASSETS BY LOCATION SELECTED * DATE 1/17/92 TIME 9120146 CC3
* PURCHASING - GFA SURPLUS * PAGE 4
ASSET# SEGO CLASS DESCRIPTION/ DESCRIPTION/ LAST INV.DATE AQ. DATE HOW CHG DATE FUNCTION
FLEET # MANUFACTURER YEAR COMMENT ASSET VALUE I.D. #
121:5
PURCHASING - GFA SURPLUS
**
009596-000000 EDP EQUIP./
DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE MOD IA WORKSTATION
1/23/91
12/28/87
P
08/30/91
513
**
FL# IBIMAINT
1987
FR 1710
670.00
1507
**
009597-000000 EDP EQUIP./
DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE MOD 1A WORKSTATION
1/23/91
12/28/87
P
08130/91
513
f **
FL# IBIMAINT
1987
FR 1710
670.00
1604
**
009702-000000 EDP EQUIP./
DISPLAY
STA./CRT
AUTOMATE 1 WORKSTATION
1/23/91
6/20/88
P
08/30/91
513
**
FL# IBIMAINT USA
1988
FR 1710
682.00
000609
I,
**
009918-000000 EDP EQUIP./
DISPLAY
STA./CRT
MOD10 AUTOMATE WORKSTATION
1/23/91
8/22/88
R
08/30/91
513
**
.FL# IBIMAINT
1988
FR 1710
668.00
001910
**
009919-000000 EDP EQUIP./
DISPLAY
STA./CRT
MOD10 AUTOMATE WORKSTATION
1/23/91
8/22/88
R
08/30/91
513
**
FL# IBIMAINT
1988
FR 1710
668.00
001916
N **
010011-000000 EDP EQUIP./
DISPLAY
STA./CRT
MOD1G AUTOMAINT WORKSTATION
1/23/91
9/29/88
P
08/30/91
513
ar **
FL# IBIMAINT
1988
FR 1710
68S.53
0002118
., **
010757-000000 COMMUNICATION / RADIO -HANDHELD
MOTOROLA HAND HELD
6/11/91
10/01/88
X
09/26/91
513
+�*
FL# MOTOROLA
1900
STORE ROOM 10
.00
330AC00195
*+�
011351-000000 OFFICE EQUIP./ TYPEWRITER
IBM TYPWRITER
10/10/89
10/01/89
X
09/27/91
513
�� **
FL#
1900
FR 1732
.00
�
d
LOCATION
TOTAL VALUE--- 101493.94
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS-------
56
0
0
cY
M. Sole Source for Hydraulic*Truck Conveyor
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/92:
DATE: January 20, 1992
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servi
o.,
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manage
Jerry Davis, Purchasing Buyer
SUBJ: Sole Source for Hydraulic Truck Conveyor
Road & Bridge Department
DESCRIPTION:
The Hydraulic Truck Conveyor mounts on the rear of a standard dump
truck box. It has both right and left hand discharge, enabling the
truck operator to deliver materials where they are needed without
expensive labor, for highway shouldering, asphalt patching, ditch
filling or landscaping.
ALTERNATIVES:
Extensive research indicates that this unit, which is patented and
distributed by the manufacturer, is the only one of its type avail-
able which meets the specifications and needs of the County's Road
and Bridge Department.
BUDGETED AMOUNT: $7,500.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests the Board's_ approval of this sole source equipment
purchase request in the amount of $6,655.50, to Hydraulic Truck
Conveyor.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
the sole source equipment purchase of a hydraulic
truck conveyor from Hydraulic Truck Conveyor in the
amount of $6,655.50, as recommended by staff.
27
SAN
mor 8b FA,F 05,
I
BOOK 85 �'A 406
N. IRC Jail Phase III - Furnishings Budget
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/92:
DATE: JANUARY 20, 1992
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTO$
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL, SERVICES
SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JAIL, - PHASE III
FURNISHING"S BUDGET
BACKGROUND:
The subject project is complete and staff is in the process of
finalizing the associated
cost. The
purchased and the invoices are tracking through gto hbeepaid.
total
bee
cost, as compared to what was approved indicates we are
budget by approximately $30,000.
under
This includes savings on
purchased -and equipment that was not bought as
items
Sheriff. requested by
the
Prior to ordering furnishings for one area, it was determined that we
needed to modify the specifications to fully confirm with Department
of Corrections requirements. This furniture had to be security type.
Security furnishings are all metal and have to be properly secured to
the floor and walls. This increased the anticipated cost of
furnishing that area by $51,995 plus an installation price of $675.
ANALYSIS:
In an effort to facilitate opening of the jail and allow for the lead
time in purchasing. security equipment these
ordered an p ese furnishings have
d are in the process o g e been
being installed..
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Since, the cost of security furnishings is in excess of the line item:
budget for that area of the jail, staff is requesting Board approval
to transfer $6,670 from a item under the budget in the same account.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, -the Board unanimously approved
the transfer of $6,670 from an item under the budget
in the same account, as recommended by staff.
28
0. 1992 Firefighters/Indian River County Fair
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/92:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: January 20, 1992
RE: 1992 FIREFIGHTERS/INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FAIR
The Firefighters have executed the attached contract with the County
for holding the 1992 Firefighters /Indian River County Fair. Our
application package is now complete and needs to be submitted to the
state. It is necessary for the Board to execute. the attached contract,
permit, and affidavit.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Board authorize the Chairman to execute the
attached documents and approve the County Attorney's Office
submitting the 1992 fair application package to the state.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
the submittal of the 1992 fair application package to
the State, and authorized the Chairman to execute the
contract, permit and affidavit.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
P. IRC Bid #92-53 - Insurance Consultant
The Board reviewed the following memos dated 1/20/92 and
1/22/92:
29
JAN 2 8 1999
BOOK `
BOOK 80 fA.,uE 4 0 S,
DATE: January 20, 1992
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Serve
FROM: Fran Boynton, Purchasing Manage
SUBJECT: IRC Bid #92-53/Insurance Consultant
Risk Management
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Bid Opening Date: January 8, 1992
Specifications mailed to: Three (3) Vendors
Replies: Two (2) Vendors
PROPOSALS RECEIVED:
Waters Risk Management Siver Insurance Management Consultants
7300 Park Street North P.O. Box 21343
Seminole, FL 34647-4601 St Petersburg, FL 33742-1343
ESTIMATED BUDGET: Cost Not To Exceed $12,000.00
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the award of this Proposal to Waters Risk Manage-
ment. This firm best demonstrated an understanding of our tasks
and proposed the most service for a lower cost. The firm is well
respected by numerous Florida local governments and we believe that
they will perform well for Indian River County.
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
THRII: Jack Price, Personnel Director��''
FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manage
DATE: 22 January 1992
BIIBJECT: Risk Management Consultant RFP
To follow up on your request, the proposed agreement with Waters
Risk Management will provide the County with specifications,
analysis and recommendations for the placement of the following
lines of insurance coverage: general liability, automobile
liability, property, flood, workers, compensation and third party
claims administration. As you know, most of these lines are
excess coverage above retention levels.
If there are further questions, please contact us.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously awarded
IRC Bid #92-53 to Waters Risk Management at a cost
not to exceed $12,000, as set out in the above staff
recommendation.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
O. Proclamation - Rockridge Week - Feb 9-15 1992
P R O C L A M A T I O N
DESIGNATING FERRIIARY 9-15, 1992
AS ROCKRIDGE TAIREK
,`IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHBREAS, Vero Beach and Indian River County are blessed by
having in their midst fine citizens from. other states and
countries who have comp to this locality in order to enjoy the
fellowship and friendship which exists here, and to partake of
the bounties of nature with which we have been endowed; and
WIiEREAS, one of the fine developments' in Indian River
County, adjacent to the City of Vero Reach, is that subdivision
known as ROCKRIDGE, composed of these fine citizens who have
enriched our community; and
WHEREAS, the citizens who live in ROCKRIDGE are clearly
civic minded and appreciative of the opportunity which they have
of enjoying life in the 'Land of Sunshine;' and
WHEREAS, the citizens of said community are celebrating the
34th anniversary of the founding of ROCKRIDGE, during which
period of time it has grown and developed into a splendid
community of worthwhile people:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY,. FLORIDA hereby proclaims the week of February 9 -
15, 1992 as
ROCKRIDGE WEEK
and the Board urges all citizens of Indian River Countv to join
with their friends in ROCKRIDGF to celebrate the 34th anniversary
of the establishment of this community.
The Board extends congratulations to the fine people of
ROCKRIDGE for their foresight in developing their community, and
for their conduct in general as enterprising and wide-awake
citizens.
Dated this 28th day of January, 1992.
31
POARD OF COUNTY COMMISSTONFRS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Carolyn Eggert fiat firman
- ----
JAN BOOK
JO� i°syr
��
BOOK
PUBLIC HEARING --PROPOSED MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE HARBOR TOWN CENTER
DRI DEVELOPMENT ORDER
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the County
Attorney announced that this public hearing has been properly
advertised, as follows:
VERO *BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach. Indian River County. Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press•Joumal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach In Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a c�
In the matter of44 ra k& A
In the
Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of Do
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press•Joumal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for -the purpose of securing this'
advertisement for publication In the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this ( y b1(+ A.D. 19
/
LOr if,
muni eks.-JObnager)
(SEAL) gtyra te'rI1G, et..•..,: �,,.,,,.
INIXAN Rim NOTICES OF P C HThe Board of ComV
ERkw If WWI
AIWM
HEARING to be at 9.05 ajTL on Aamjay,
Chwatows doff the 1992. Int t
eand Adft
at 1840 25th Shaer, VGM Beach.
Theof mb,Jet)h�aofr thte hheoarrirctq a to pprr�r �pdon
be
bar ToOrder �wnO= Ma#: The n
late to CIMBU n of a ma cons MUM oorrerbnDe.
Mittel .t+nd hcNabn of a man efts plan er4}
of the sa&WSW
Le p�F�t� ,Town" 32 SoaatFr W
Rapt`•�r�al and NcM-
eaaiot�lJgSF�twayjp,
5) nenbWs 1n Said land Iy g amid
bebg In kWien River county,
afteW WW
Pa members of ep pubUcbffc �� who may wish to appew ajWdedalM �Y
this rflm** WR need to arrwue � �v tirmft mn
record oft pnoceedirp is nrede, which Mkxiaa
b and evidence upon which t appeal b
INDIAN RNNER COUNTY
p
gy_� NBkd MMISSIONEIiS
ARVAN
Dec. 19, 1991 860782
A
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/16/92:
TO: James Chandler DATE: January 16, 1992
County Administrator
DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE:
obs M. a ti g, mcp
Community Developmefit Director
FROM: Stan Boling AICP
Planning Director
SUBJECT: Proposed Minor Amendment to the Harbor Town Center DRI
Development Order
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular
meeting of January 28, 1992.
BACKGROUND:
On March 28, 1989, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a
development order (D.O.) approving the development of regional
impact (DRI) project known as the Harbor Town Center regional mall.
Subsequently, on September 26, 19891 some minor amendments to the
D.O. were adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. The
amended D.O. remains in effect.
The project site consists of ±92.5 acres located on the east side
Of U.S. #1 between 53rd Street and the Main Relief Canal (see
attachment #1). The proposed project includes approximately
747,000 square feet of gross retail commercial mall and outparcel
building area. The proposed project has the appropriate commercial
land use designation and commercial zoning, and has a valid,
effective D.O. Thus, the next step in the Harbor Town Center mall
development process is the submission and approval of.a site plan.
However, no site plan application has been submitted to date, and
no project construction has taken place.
REQUESTED AMENDMENT AND REQUIRED ACTION:
The D.O. contains many sections dealing with a variety of issues
and impacts. Among the issues addressed are project construction
commencement deadlines. One of the construction commencement
deadlines requires that project construction (either the mall
building itself or certain outparcel development) begin by March
28, 1992. Due to delays in the construction of Indian River
Boulevard which is crucial to the project, and other factors, the
current project developer (Petrie-Dierman-Kuhn, Inc.) is requesting
that the March 28, 1992 commencement deadline be deleted from the
D.O. (see attachment #2).
Pursuant to FS 380.06 which governs DRIB, the county may determine
that the request does not constitute a substantial deviation and
may be treated as a "minor amendment". As a minor amendment, a
change in an. approved D.O. can be made by the Board of County
Commissioners without formal Regional Planning Council action.
Pursuant to LDR section 916.05(1), the Planning and Zoning
Commission has considered the request. At its regular meeting of
January 9, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted
33
JAN 28 1992 'ROOK 4 11
Fr
81992
E ROOK 5 FtAl 41
unanimously to recommend that the'Board determine that the request
is not a substantial deviation and approve the request as
recommended by staff at the conclusion of this. report -- .(see
attachment #4).
ANALYSIS:
*Determination: Not a Substantial Deviation
County, Department of Community Affairs (DCA), and Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) staff have reviewed the request
pursuant to FS 380.06 and have concluded that the request does not
increase project impacts and does not constitute a substantial
deviation and may be treated as a minor amendment. Thus, all staff
analyses indicate that the county should find that the request does
not constitute a substantial deviation.
*Effect of Request
The D.O. contains two project construction commencement deadlines,
which are as follows:
1. Commencement of project construction by March 28, 1992. This
deadline requires commencement of construction of either the
mall or at least 21500 square feet of gross building area of
commercial development on an outparcel by March 28, 1992.
2. Commencement of mall construction by December 31, 1993. This
deadline requires commencement of construction of the mall
building Itself by December 31, 1993.
The D.O. also contains two mall construction progress completion
deadlines, which are as follows:
A. Completion of mall structural foundation within 210 days of
commencement of mall construction. This deadline requires
that, once mall construction begins, the developer complete
the structural foundation within 210 days.
B. Completion of mall "shell" construction (within 24 months of
commencement of mall construction). . This deadline requires
that, once mail construction begins, the developer complete
the mall "shell" (foundation, exterior walls, roofing) within
24 months.
The current developer proposes to delete from the D.O. the
commencement of project construction deadline, described above as
deadline #1. All other deadlines would remain in effect. The
deadline #1" was included in the D.O. on the recommendation of the
TCRPC. It is the TCRPCCIs standard policy to have a three year
construction commencement deadline in a D.O. However, the TCRPC
staff have reviewed the proposed deadline deletion request and have
no objection to approval of the request (see attachment #3).
County staff, including public works, utilities services, emergency
services, and planning staff have reviewed the request and have no
objections to approval of the request. However, planning staff has
some concern that removal of the March 28, 1992 construction
commencement deadline could create a situation at the end of 1993
where the developer and county staff could be "pressed for time" to
ensure that mall site plan approval and construction permitting is
completed in enough time for the developer to meet the December 31,
1993 mall construction deadline (reference deadline #2)
Therefore, planning staff has proposed and the applicant, through
its agent Steve Henderson, Esq., has agreed to include within the
D.O. a mall site plan application submittal deadline. Thus, the
D.O. could be amended to the satisfaction of the developer and
county staff by deleting the March 28, 1992 commencement of project
construction deadline and adding a June 30, 1993 mall site plan
application submittal deadline.
34
s
*Proposed Resolution
The proposed resolution (see attachment #5) deletes the existing
section 2a. language relating to the March 28, 1992 construction
commencezhent deadline and adds language to section 2a to require
submittal of a complete mall site plan application on or before
June 30, 1993. Failure to meet this deadline would result in
termination of the DRI approval. In accordance with existing D.O.
language, if the DRI approval is terminated, the -Board of County
Commissioners may place a commercial development moratorium on the
property and re -designate and downzone the property. In staff's
opinion, the proposed DO changes along with existing DO language
contain adequate safeguards for either development or non -
development of the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners:
1. Determine that the request does not constitute a substantial
deviation.
2. Adopt the attached resolution amending the Harbor Town Center
mall D.O. by deleting the March 28, 1992 commencement of
project construction deadline and adding a June 30, 1993 mall
site plan application submittal deadline.
35
aooK
JAN 199 P�jc
iJAW 2b BOOK 85 FACE.
36
Commissioner Scurlock asked if we have established the same
18 -month deadline extension policy for DRIs as we do for other site
plans, and Planning Director Stan Boling advised that we do not
have a policy specifically for DRIB. Actually, this is not an
extension, but, in effect, it is the same thing. We would be
moving a deadline from March 28, 1992 to the end of 1993, which is
roughly in that 18 -month range. In considering a minor amendment,
you look at certain justifications, and this project has been tied
to the construction of Indian River Boulevard and the Boulevard
going forward. Apparently, the Boulevard has been running behind
a little bit in terms of what was planned when this project came
through three years ago, so the basis for. the request is that
things were running behind in terms of some of the infrastructure
and things they were counting on being in place at some point.
Commissioner Scurlock understood that construction is going on
currently in Phase III of the Boulevard, that we are going to have
some crews out there doing some clearing on Phase IV, and that we
expect to go out to bid and start construction on Phase IV
somewhere around this time next year.
Public Works Director Jim Davis hoped to go out to bid this
spring on the construction of Phase IV of the Boulevard itself, not
the east/west connecting roads.
Commissioner Scurlock felt that if the developer's time frame
is even further out, it would be better to give him an extension
that would coincide with construction of the Boulevard. He just
preferred to deal with it right up front if we are delaying him.
Chairman Eggert wondered if the east/west connecting roads
were delaying him, and Director Davis advised that we have some
right-of-way acquisition to complete on the east/west roads and we
have some DOT problems to resolve which we hope to do this year.
Director Boling advised that the time frames are such that if
the contracts for the Boulevard were let sometime in the next year
or year and a half it should coincide with the time frames they
need. They just need to submit a site plan by the end of June,
1993 and start construction before the end of 1993.
Commissioner Scurlock just preferred to deal with it here
because he believed there is some consistency in policy on how long
these things can drag on. If we are holding up the developer, and
let's say it ends up being 23 months so that it coincides with the
requirement of the Boulevard, he would prefer we do that.
Chairman. Eggert noted that DRIB within the Treasure Coast
Regional Council have been extended for years and years, but
Commissioner Scurlock stated he would not be in favor of that.
37
JAN 28 ffi
L
BOOK Jr. 4-.
I
POOK 85 FAUL 416
Community Development Director Robert Keating explained that
this amendment is not really an extension. The original date
was something that was put in there to meet TCRC's 3 -year period.
It only requires the beginning of construction of 2500 square feet
and that 2500 square feet doesn't even have to be the mall facility
itself.
Commissioner Scurlock understood then that it is Director
Keating's opinion that the 1993 date is not an unnecessary
constraint that they cannot meet.
Commissioner Bowman wondered why the 2500 sq. ft. out parcel
was even included, and Director Boling explained that it was to
satisfy the TCRC in that construction would start on something on
the entire site and because the developer wanted to narrow it down
to something other than the mall itself. It is something that can
be built on right now.
Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing, and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Attorney Steve Henderson, representing the developer, stated
he was here to answer any questions the Board might have about this
minor amendment.
Chairman Eggert understood that they still have to start
construction by the end of 1993.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-13, amending the Development Order
(DO) approved by the Board of County Commissioners
for the Harbor Town Center Mall Development of
Regional Impact (DRI); with amendments as set out in the
above staff recommendation.
38
a
e
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 13
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (DO)
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE
HARBOR TOWN CENTER MALL DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
(DRI).
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380 Florida
Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida has adopted Resolution No. 89-31A establishing the
Development Order approving the Harbor Town Center Mall Development
of Regional Impact and has adopted Resolution No. 89-128 amending
said Development Order, and
WHEREAS, the developer has formally applied for and has agreed to
certain language changes within the Development Order relating to
the deletion of a March 28, 1992 project construction commencement
deadline and the addition of a June 30, 1993 mall site plan
application submittal deadline, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that the
requested and proposed changes to the Development Order do not
constitute a substantial deviation, pursuant to Chapter 380 Florida
Statutes,
NOW: THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners
of Indian River County, Florida that the adopted Development Order
approving the Harbor Town Center Mall Development of Regional
Impact, as amended, be hereby amended as follows:
SECTION 1:
Section 2 of the Development Order (reference pp. 3 - 6 of
Resolution 89-31A, p. 1 of Resolution 89-128) shall be amended to
read as follows:
2. COMMENCEMENT AND CONTINUATION OF DEVELOPMENT; TERMINATION OF
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
a• Mall Site Plan
Application Submittal Deadline
On or before June 30, 1993, the developer shall submit to the
county planning division a complete site plan application for
the construction of at least three hundred twenty thousand
(320,000) square feet of regional commercial facility (single,
enclosed mall building). In the event the develoner failia tn
meet tnis deadline, develo went approval shall terminate and
the development shall be subiect to further development -of -
regional -impact review by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council and Indian River County pursuant to Section 380.06.
Coding: Words in • . type are deletions
Words underlined are additions.
39
r
from existing law.
r
JAW 28 1992 BOOK 8 5 F',�GE 4 1S'
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 13
b. Commercial Outparcels and Residential Development Site(s)
1. Development of the residential site(s) and the commercial
outparcels (as referenced in the ADA) which are located
entirely within the area described in Exhibit "A-2" may
commence and proceed once all necessary development plan
approvals and permits are obtained.
2. No site plan(s) shall be released and no building permit
shall be issued for the development of the commercial
outparcels (as referenced in the ADA) which are located
outside of the area described in Exhibit "A-2" until the
developer completes (as determined by the county building
department) at least fifty percent (50%) of the
structural foundation elements (at, above, and below
grade) necessary for the construction at least three
hundred twenty thousand (320,000) square feet of regional
commercial facility (mall) gross building area.
'c. Regional Commercial Facility (Mall)
1. In the event the developer fails to commence significant
physical development of at least three hundred twenty
thousand --(320,000) square feet of regional commercial
facility- (mall) gross building area,. on or before
December 31, 1993, development approval shall terminate
and the development shall be subject to further
development -of -regional -impact review by the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council and Indian River County
pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. The
developer shall notify in writing the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council and Indian River County of the
date significant physical development has commenced, and
shall specifically identify by reference to an approved
site plan the building(s) and area(s) within the initial
mall construction phase. For the purposes of this
paragraph, significant physical development shall be
deemed to have commenced after placement of permanent
evidence of a structure (other than a mobile home) on the
subject site(s)I such as the pouring of slabs or footings
or any work beyond the stage of excavation, land
clearing, or earthwork.
2. The developer shall complete (as determined by the county
building department) all structural foundation elements
(at, above, or below grade) for at least three hundred
twenty thousand (320,000) square feet of regional
commercial facility (mall) gross building area, within
Coding: Words in • type are deletions from existing law.
Words underlined are additions040
-
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 13
two hundred ten (210) days of the commencement date as
noticed by the developer to the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council and Indian River County (reference c.1.,
above) for the building(s) and area(s) specifically
identified by the developer as the initial mall
construction phase. In the event the developer fails to
complete construction within the prescribed deadlines,
then, after at least 10 calendar days notice to the
developer, the County may, upon hearing, revoke the mall
site plan approval.
3. The developer shall complete "shell" construction of the
initial mall construction phase within twenty-four (24)
months from the commencement date as noticed by the
developer to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
and Indian River County (reference c.l., above) for the
area(s) specifically identified by the developer as the
initial mall construction phase. In the event the
developer fails to complete construction with the
prescribed deadlines, then, after at least 10 calendar
days notice to the developer, the County may, upon
hearing, revoke the mall site plan approval. -For
purposes of this paragraph, "complete shell construction"
is defined as completion of the building foundation,
roofing, and exterior walls as depicted within the
approved building permit plans, as verified by the county
building department upon inspection of the building site.
4. With respect to paragraphs 2.c.2 and 2.c.3. above, the
following shall apply. In the event.that the developer
shall be delayed or hindered in or prevented from the
performance or any act or requirement under conditions
2.c.2. and 2.c.3 of this Development Order by reasons of
strikes, lockouts or labor troubles; inability to procure
due to general shortage, government rationing or
regulation of labor, materials, equipment, facilities or
sources of energy (including, without limitation,
electricity, oil or gas); failure of power or
transportation; riots, mob violence, sabotage, malicious
mischief, insurrection or war; Acts of God, fire,
earthquake, flood, hurricane, explosion or other'casualty
or other reason of a similar nature beyond the reasonable
control of the developer in performing work or doing acts
specified under the terms of conditions 2.c.2 and 2.c.3
of this Development Order, then, and in each such event,
performance of such work or act shall be excused for the
period of the delay (including the duration of both the
actual delay and any consequential delays resulting
therefrom) and any period set forth in conditions 2.c.2
and 2.c.3 of the Development Order in performance of any
such work or act shall be extended for a period
equivalent to the period of such delay (including the
duration of both the actual delay and any consequential
delays resulting therefrom).
S. The developer hereby covenants with the County that, in
the event that the Mall Development Order is terminated,
no plans to develop commercial uses on the Mall site
shall be submitted or approved for a period of at least
nine (9) months after Development Order termination. The
purpose of this covenant is to give the County the
ability to reconsider the land use designation and zoning
of the site in the event that Mall Development Order is
terminated. The County in its discretion may waive this
provision.
Coding: Words in • . tyre are deletions from existing law.
Words underlined are additions.
41
JAN 28 1992 Rory ;b 419
F,
B00K F UL "14
RESOLUTION NO. 92-13
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Whpplpr
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ri m , and,
upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn R. Eggert AMP
Vice -Chairman Margaret C. Bowman AXP_
Commissioner Richard N. Bird AMP
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Ayp
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Ayp
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this _28 day of .lanuary , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
• „ BY
Chairma Carolyn Eggert
ATTEST
Jeffr aeon, ounty Clerk
APPROVED AS T PLANNING MATTERS:
�iMm
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins; Deputy
County Attorney
\u\c\s\ghamend.res
Indian River Ca Approved Gate
Admin.
Decal 6 y
Budget
hep I.
Risk Mgr. AA/'
Coding: Words in . type are deletions from existing law.
Words underlined are additions. "
PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 206 -
HOUSING
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, the County
Attorney announced that this public hearing has been properly
advertised, as follows:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a
iri-the matter of—0, 6 �d Y�
in the
lished in said newspaper in the issues o /
Court, was pub-
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement: and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing thla
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. /) )
Sworn to and subscribed bet me t day A.D. 19 - -
/ r �jfiaSa-Manager)
(SEAL) Notary Public, Stole of Florido
My CwRmisdan Expires June 29, 1993
43
NOTIC! OF PUKW REAIMID
Tisa Board Of Canty Cannftslorw of Yrdan
Fiber Caedy, Florida, hereby _ rr M & A of a
P� adnerroaadnenoe fr
ADDI ANA CRIAAf�Efi
MW OR MOD of QeSP�b NearY0g harry 2A
ISM will need to own so am
raoad of
the prooeednps is
R. Wlrloh fnobdaataattnrony
.lard 1 10 1� 1 whlah the appeal labasad o
�OGK 6D F'F1uF. 4,:-L
JAM 28 1997
r
VD ,ry ,
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/8/92:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County AttorneyvoQ
DATE: Janaury 8, 1992
RE: PUBLIC HEARING 1/28/92
CHAPTER 206 - HOUSING
Chapter 10 1/2 Housing (1974 edition) has been prepared for recodifica-
tion as Chapter 206 - Housing in the new Indian River County Code.
Staff recommends that Chapter 206 be adopted.
Chairman Eggert announced that the Affordable Housing Finance
Authority is recommending that this chapter be repealed.
County Attorney Vitunac explained that this Chapter presently
exists in our ordinances. In reviewing all the ordinances coming
into the new Code, staff is unanimously of the opinion that Chapter
206 is dangerous to have since it has not been put into effect.
This ordinance allows an independent housing finance authority to
be created and once it is created by the Board of County
Commissioners, it would be independent of the Board and it would be
out there much as the Housing Authority is. There would be two
housing agencies with a similar name, neither one of which would be
under the control of the County Commission. It was our thought
that since the Escambia County bond is out there in a pooled fund
right now for any needs that the county does have, there is no need
for this ordinance. There has been some confusion in the bond
market about the similarity in the names of the Housing Authority
and this one. In addition, Chairman Eggert has other plans that we
could put into Chapter 206 in the future if the Board decides to
create something under its own control for housing.
With regard to the trust, Chairman Eggert suggested that we
just have a committee recommend to the County Commission so that we
don't get into the bureaucracy of an independent district.
Attorney Vitunac advised that because this is in the wrong
form today to repeal it, he would have to bring this back to the
Board at an advertised public hearing. .
Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed
the public hearing.
44
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously directed
the County Attorney to proceed to repeal Chapter 206
of the Codes of Indian River County, Florida.
BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 011 - PURCHASE OF E911 LOGGING RECORDER FOR
VERO BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/16/92:
TO: `-Board` of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James'C. Chandler
County Admknistjator
14 W
FROM: Doug Wright; Director
Department of Emergency
SUBJECT: Purchase of E911 Logging
Police Department Public
and Budget Amendment No.
Services
Recorder for Vero Beach
Safety Answering Point
011
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be
given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at
the next regular scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Vero Beach Police Department E911 Public Safety Answering Point
(PSAP) has a Dictaphone 5500 eight (8) channel dual logging recorder
which is used to record all incoming and outgoing calls for the PSAP.
The serial number of the recorder is 906410 and it is a model 5082.
The equipment was purchased in January, 1987, at a cost of
$12,029.75. The recorder is requiring a substantial amount of
maintenance and its ability to function around the clock is very
questionable. Given the nature and sensitivity of the information
being recorded, staff from the Vero Beach Police Department is
requesting that the recorder be replaced from the E911 surcharge
fund.
The Dictaphone Company currently provides logging recorders under
State Contract #725-630-90-1. The Vero Beach Police Department PSAP
is seeking a Dictaphone Model 9102 ten channel dual transport
recorder/reproducer per the attached quote for a total price of
$19,581.80 which includes installation and maintenance.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The recorder was not budgeted -in this fiscal --year due to the
information being supplied to Indian River County at a late date in
the budget process. Plans were to include it in the next fiscal year
budget, but the Vero Beach Police Department 911 staff indicate the
current recorder will not continue to function accurately for that
extended period of time.
Based on the fact that information conveyed to the 911 secondary PSAP
must be accurately and correctlyrecorded
requirements and to :protect the ciy and county
from tlitigatito on,�
staff recommends that the recorder be replaced.
Funds are available per the attached budget amendment for the
purchase of the capital equipment.
RECORKENDATION
Staff recommends the Board approve budget amendment no. 011 and the
purchase of the ten channel recorder/reproducer from state contract
for the Vero Beach Police Department Public Safety Answering Point.
45
BOOK Fair'42,3
JAN -28 199
ag W
NOOK 85 FitUE 4 I
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
Budget Amendment No. 011 and the purchase of the ten
channel recorder/reproducer from state contract for
the Vero Beach Police Dept. Public Safety Answering
Point.
TO: Members of the Board
of County Commissioners
FROM: Joseph A. Ba
OMB Director
911
911 SURCHARGE
SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT
NUMBER: 011
DATE: January 20. 1991
APPROVAL OF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL AID BETWEEN IRC
BREVARD COUNTY AND. IRC EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/13/92:
y
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: James C. Chandler
County Admi istr for
FROM: Doug Wright; Director
Emergency Services
DATE: January 13, 1992
SUBJECT: Approval of Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Aid
between Indian River County, Brevard County and
the Indian River County Emergency Services District
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be
given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at
the next regiilar scheduled meeting.
46
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
During late 1991, staff from the Department of Emergency Services and
the County Attorney's Office prepared a draft Interlocal Agreement
for Mutual Aid and forwarded it to Brevard County for consideration.
The agreement was acceptable to Brevard County and the Chairman of
the Board of County Commissioners executed the document on December
17, 1991. The executed document was received by the Department of
Emergency Services on January 8, 1992 and it is now before the Board
for consideration.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act of 19690, Section 163.01,
Florida Statutes, permits local government units to cooperate with
other local governments on a basis of mutual advantage. In this
agreement,, the parties agree to provide fire and rescue services,
emergency medical treatment, and emergency management services for
the health, safety, and welfare of their respective citizens.
Staff feels the issues relating to method of requesting assistance,
number of units responding, liability, costs, and on scene
coordination have been adequately addressed in the mutual aid
agreement and requests Board approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Interlocal Agreement and requests
the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved
the Interlocal Agreement and authorized the Chairman's
signature, as recommended by staff.
AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
APPROVAL OF FUNDING FOR INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR VOLUNTEER FIRE AND
EMS FUND RAISING EVENTS
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/17/92:
TO: u-Board,of County Commissioners
Board.of Fire Commissioners
North County Fire District
South County Fire District
THROUGH: James C. Chandler
County Admjx4strafor
FROM: Doug Wright,,wirector
Department of Emergency Services
DATE: January 17, 1992
SUBJECT: Approval of Funding For Insurance Coverage For
Volunteer Fire and EMS Fund Raising Events
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be
given formal -consideration by the Board of County Commissioners and
the Board of Fire Commissioners at the next regular scheduled
meeting.
47
BUUK 4
JAN 28
JAN 28 1616,9192g� -
' a00K �ee� P.tiJ�E °���'
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Sebastian Volunteer Fire Department, Roseland Volunteer Fire
Department, Fellsmere Volunteer Fire Department, Vero Lake Estates
Volunteer Fire Department, South County Volunteer Fire Department,
and the Fellsmere Volunteer Ambulance Service provide a very
important part in the delivery of emergency services in Indian River
County.
Since they -are volunteer entities associated with the Department of
Emergency Services, funds are provided by the respective District to
maintain the structures of each of the organizations as well as
recurring expenses related to utilities, etc, except for the
Fellsmere Volunteer Ambulance Service. The county provides an amount
determined by the Board each year to support this organization.
Insurance coverage is also provided for liability, worker's
compensation, errors and omissions, and death or injury. However,
when the volunteer organizations schedule fund: raising events
(chicken dinners, open house, etc) for other expenses related to the
volunteer operation, they are required to obtain insurance coverage
for those special events to minimize risk to the county.
To assist the volunteer organizations in obtaining and retaining more
of the funds collected at the fund raising events, it is staff's
position that coverage should be obtained through the county
insurance program for these special events each year. The parameters
under which the insurance coverage is recommended is based on:
1. The fund raising, recruitment or special event occurs on
the premises utilized by the volunteer agency, and
2. The funds are utilized for enhancing and/or improving the
equipment, training, operations, membership recruitment,
membership benefits, or facility of the volunteer entity.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The volunteer organizations are having a difficult time in realizing
any substantial revenue from fund raising events by the time they pay
the cost of .the special event insurance premiums. This is especially
true in this period of economic decline as a result of the recession.
It should be noted that these special events are also used for
recruiting purposes to obtain additional members for the respective
organization. It would also be a great help to the organization in
terms of raising sufficient revenue each year so that the volunteer
entity could provide some incentive to its members thereby assisting
them in recruiting new members. _
In the six year plan approved by the voters in 1990, the volunteers
serve a 'becondary role for the most part. However, all the
organizations arb sorely needed, primary and secondary, to maintain
sufficient coverage .for fire and EMS services throughout the county.
The Risk Manager. advises that the insurance coverage can be obtained
from Scottsdale' -Insurance Company through the Florida League of
Cities for $200.00 per agency per year or a total of $1,200.00. This
would greatly benefit the volunteer organizations mentioned above and
help them in raising funds and recruiting new members.
Funds for the insurance coverage would come from existing accounts
in the appropriate budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board approve the additional funds from the
appropriate budget to obtain insurance coverage for fund raising
events each year for each volunteer organization noted based on the
criteria referenced above. It is also recommended that the Board
authorize the Risk Manager to obtain the coverage and grant approval
for the Budget Director to make the necessary budget amendments.
48
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
additional funds from the appropriate budget to obtain
insurance coverage for fund raising events each year, as
set out in the above staff recommendation.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - STUDY OF CITY/COUNTY RECREATION DEPARTMENT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/92:
MS�BAI�IDDII 91
MEMO: Jim Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Patricia Callahan, Recreation Director '
J
DATE: January 20, 1992
RE: Request for Proposal - Recreation Study - Agenda item
for January 28, 1992
During 91 - 92 Budget Hearing, staff was instructed to initiate
_ a study of the City/County Recreation Department. Please find attached
a scope of work for the Request for Proposal.
It is recommended the Board of County Commissioners authorize
staff to proceed with the RFP.
PC/jpw
Attachments
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously
authorized staff to proceed with the RFP on a study
of the City/County Recreation Department.
COPY OF SCOPE OF WORK IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD
RIGHT-OF-WAY PURCHASE - 44TH AVE
NUE - SWEZEY
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/20/92:
49
JAN 2 8 1992
RooK � F.E �v
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
and f�
Roger D. Cain, P.E.
County Engineer
FROM: Donald G. Finney, SRA
County Right of Way Agent
SUBJECT: Right of Way Purchase / 44th Avenue / Swezey
DATE: January 20, 1992
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Indian River County is needing an additional 19.5 foot by 131.5
foot part of the Sharon Swezey property in order to complete the
paving and drainage improvements along 44th Avenue, north of 16th
Street.
The county obtained an appraisal by George Kmetz in July, 1991
indicating a $2,872.00 value or $1.12 per square foot for the right
of way parcel.
Bruce Barkett represents the property owner and his client is
willing to sell the parcel to Indian River County at the purchase
price of $1.37 per square foot or $3,521.00.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The parcel has increased in value since the appraisal date. The
parcel can be purchased now in lieu of additional appraisal costs
or attorney's fees.
RECOMMENDA ION
Staff recommends the Board authorize the purchase of the 19.5 foot
by 131.5 foot strip for $3,521.00 or $1.37 per square foot.
FUNDING
Petition Paving Project.Fund; Account No. 173-214-541- 066.12
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously authorized
the purchase of the 19.5 ft. by 131.5 ft. strip for
$3,521 or $1.37 per square foot; funding from the
Petition Paving Project Fund, Account No. 173-214-541-
066.12, as recommended by staff.
50
71,
RESOLUTIONS PROVIDING FOR PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO AND
SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATES FOR:
A) 11TH ST. SW, 11TH PLACE SW & MADRID AVENUE IN GRANADA
GARDENS SUBDIVISION
B) 83RD PLACE, 84TH ST. & TROPICAL AVE. IN GRAVES
ADDITION TO WABASSO SUBDIVISION
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/17/92:
TO: James Chandler
County Adminis,
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.
Public Works Directo J
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E.
County Engineer ^,,'
FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, CE
Civil Engineer
SUWECT: Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage
Improvements to and set Public Hearing date for:
1) 11th Street SW, 11th Place SW & Madrid Avenue in
Granada Gardens Subdivision
2)"83rd Place, 84th Street & Tropical Avenue in Graves
Addition to Wabasso Subdivision
DATE: January 17, 1992
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The County Public Works Department has initiated a public
improvement assessment for road paving and drainage improvements
for the following:
1) 11th Street SW, 11th Place SW & Madrid Avenue in Granada
Gardens Subdivision
2) 83rd Place, 84th Street & Tropical Avenue in Graves
Addition to Wabasso Subdivision
A separate resolution will need to be adopted to hold a Public
Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the
assessment against each property owner.
This Public Hearing has been sclleaduled for Tuesday, .-.-February 25,
1992 at 9:05 A.M. in the County Commission Chambers.
An assessment roll and plat has been prepared and filed with the
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners.
51
BOOK U F 41 ,f I I-!"
''N 2 8 1992
`I
BOOK+..'�' frl�Ur d1�,te� �C'
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING
It is recommended that motions be made to:
1) Adopt the resolution providing for the paving and drainage
improvements for the projects subject to the terms outlined in
the resolution. The applicable interest rate shall be
established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time
the final assessment roll is approved.
2) Allocate $198,044.72 from the Petition Paving Account #173-
214-541-035.39.
3) Adopt a resolution setting the time and place of the Public
Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-14, providing for certain paving and
drainage improvements to 11th Street SW, 11th Place SW
and Madrid Ave. in Granada Gardens Subdivision, etc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-15, setting a time and place at which the
owners of property on 11th Street SW, 11th Place SW and
Madrid Avenue in Granada Gardens Subdivision may appear
before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard,
etc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-16, providing for certain paving and
drainage improvements to 83rd Place, 84th Street and
Tropical Avenue in Graves Addition to Wabasso
Subdivision, etc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92.-17, setting a time and place at which
the owners of property on 83rd Place, 84th Street and
Tropical Avenue in Graves Addition to Wabasso Subdivision
may appear before the Board of County Commissioners and
be heard, etc.
52
Providing (First Reso.) 2/20/91(ENG)RESI.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 92-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 11TH
STREET S.W., 11TH PLACE, S.W., AND MADRID AVENUE IN
GRANADA GARDENS SUBDIVISION, PROVIDING THE TOTAL
ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS,
NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Indian River County Code
(Prior Code Chapter 23.3, New Code Chapter 952.09), providing for
the paving and drainage improvements to public roads thru a special
assessment process, and whereas monies have been escrowed by an
existing property owner in an area to be benefited, in accordance
with the requirements of Code Chapter 23.3, and whereas on May 28,
1986 at the regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners,
the Board directed staff to prepare an involuntary assessment for
Road Paving and Drainage improvements for 11th Street SW, 11th
Place SW and Madrid Avenue in Granada Gardens Subdivision.
WHEREAS, the construction of paving and drainage
improvements by special assessment funding is further authorized by
Section 11-21, 11-22, and 11-41, Indian River County Code of Laws
and Ordinances; and cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls
have been completed by the Public Works Department; and the total
estimated cost of the proposed paving and drainage improvements is
ONE HUNDRED AND SIX THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWELVE DOLLARS and
NINETY SIX CENTS ($106,412.96); and
WHEREAS, the special assessment provided hereunder shall,
for any given record owner of property within the area specially
benefited, be in an amount equal to that proportion of seventy-five
percent (75%) of the total cost of the project _($79,809.72) which
the potential number of buildable lots owned by the given owner
bears to the total number of parcels within the areas specially
benefited and twenty-five percent (25%) of the total cost of the
project ($26.603.24) will come from Petition Paving Account; and
53
' J A K 2 8.A '1
BOOK ) It I f,?,c 431
F_
JA Z.
BOOK f;9U 4;
No. 92 -
WHEREAS, the special assessment shall become due and
payable at the Office of the Tax Collector of Indian River County
ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special
assessment pursuant to Section 11-47, Indian River County Code of
Laws and Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said
ninety (90) day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at
a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time
of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable
in two (2) equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12)
months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly;
and
WHEREAS, after examination of the nature and anticipated
usage of the proposed improvements, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that the following described
properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these
improvement, to wit:
Lots 2 through 10, Block A; Lots 1 & 19, Block B;
Lots 3 through 17, Block B; Lot 1, Block C; Lots 3
through 8, Block C; Granada Gardens Subdivision,
Plat Book 3, Page 91 and E 455 ft. of SE h of NW h
less S 680 ft as recorded in O.R. Book 771, Page
751.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in
their entirety.
2. A project providing for paving and drainage
improvements to 11th Street, S.W., 11th Lane S.W., and Madrid
Avenue in Granada Gardens Subdivision; heretofore designated as
Public Works Project No. 8627 is hereby approved subject to the
terms outlined above and all applicable requirements of Section 11-
41, et seq. Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances.
54
No. 92- 14
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Wheeler who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Scurlock and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn R. Eggert Aye
Vice -Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and
adopted this 28 day of January , 1992.
Attest:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
TAWROLY—N—W EGG ERT, airman
�&l
� yy�
A dmirL
Legal
Budget
Eng
Deg l
Ai Msh
ADpr;ved Jai.
JAN 28 1992 bou O ,3
Z
F,
R 'l
Time and Place (Second Res*.)
8
2/20/91(ENG)RES2.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 92-1,L
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS
OF PROPERTY ON 11TH STREET SW, 11TH PLACE SW
AND MADRID AVENUE IN GRANADA GARDENS
SUBDIVISION AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY
APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY
AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING PAVING AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PROPERTY AS TO THE COST
THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR,
AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY
ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED
THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has, by Resolution No. 92-14 , determined that it is
necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the
county, and particularly as to those living, working, and
owning -property within the area described hereafter, that
paving and drainage improvements be made to; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an
assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to
the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 11-46, Indian River County Code, requires
that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and
place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or
any other persons interested therein may appear before the
Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety
and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements,
as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor,
and as to the amount thereof to be* assessed against each
property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission
chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour
of _ 9:05 A.M. on Tuesday. February 25 1992, at which time
the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other
interested persons may appear before said Commission and
be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and
56
_ ® RESOLUTION NM.2-15
the properties to be specially benefited are more
particularly described upon the assessment plat and the
assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said
improvements and the special assessments against the
properties to be specially benefited may review the
assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the
assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said
improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the
office of the Clerk to the Board any week day from 8:30
A.M. until 5:00 P.M.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall
be given by the Department of Public Works by two
publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a
week apart. The last publication shall be at least one
week prior to the date of the hearing. The Indian River
County Department of Public Works shall give the owner of
each property to be specially assessed at least ten days
notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be
served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such
property owners at his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption *by Commissioner
Wheeler , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Scurlock and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr.Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 28 day of January , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY--
CAROLYWK. EGGER ,
Chai
57
BOOK F,,;c 11oj
J A J 9 9 2 BOOK 6 c . C
Providing (First Reso.) 2/20/91(ENG)RESI.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 16
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 83RD
PLACE, 84TH STREET AND TROPICAL AVENUE IN GRAVES
ADDITION TO WABASSO, FLORIDA, PROVIDING THE TOTAL
ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS,
NUMBER OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITTED.
WHEREAS, the County Public Works Department has initiated
a public improvement assessment for Road Paving and Drainage
Improvement for 83rd Place, 84th Street and Tropical Avenue in
Graves Addition to Wabasso, Florida.
WHEREAS, the construction of paving and drainage
improvements by special assessment funding is authorized by Section
11-21, 11-22, and 11-41, Indian River County Code of Laws and
Ordinances; and cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls
have been completed by the Public Works Department; and the total
estimated cost of the proposed paving and drainage improvements is
NINTY_ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED AND THIRTY ONE DOLLARS and SEVENTY
SIX CENTS ($916631.76); and
WHEREAS, the special assessment provided hereunder shall,
for any given record owner of property within the area specially
benefited, be in an amount equal to that proportion of seventy-five
percent (75%) of the total cost of the project (568.723.82) which
the potential number of buildable lots owned by the given owner
bears to the total number of parcels within the areas specially
benefited and twenty-five percent (25%) of the total cost of the
project (522.907.94) will come from Petition Paving Account; and
WHEREAS, the special assessment shall become due and
payable at the Office of the Tax Collector of Indian River County
ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special
assessment pursuant to Section 11-47, Indian River County Code of
Laws and Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said
ninety (90) day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at
58
s
a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time
of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable
in two (2) equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12)
months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly;
and
WHEREAS, after examination of the nature and anticipated
usage of the proposed improvements, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that the following described
properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these
improvement, to wit:
Lots 8 through 12, Block 3; Lots 5 through 8, Block
5; Lots 1 though 4; Lots 7 through 9,.Block 6; Lots
1 & 2, Block 7; and Lots 2 through 5, Block 8;
Graves Addition to Wabasso, Florida, Plat Book 2,
Page 41.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in
their entirety.
2. A project providing for paving and drainage
improvements to 83rd Place, 84th Street and Tropical Avenue in
Graves Addition to Wabbaso, Florida; heretofore designated as
Public Works Project No. 8639 is hereby approved subject to the
terms outlined above and all applicable requirements of Section 11-
41, et seq. Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Wheeler who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Scurlock and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice -Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and
adopted this 28 day of January , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
59 By
CAROLW. EGGER , Chairman
BOOK FAtA
I
BOOK
Time and Place (Second Reso.) 2/20/91(ENG)RES2.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 92-_17
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS
OF PROPERTY ON 83RD PLACE, 84TH STREET AND
TROPICAL AVENUE IN GRAVES ADDITION TO WABASSO
SUBDIVISION AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY
APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY
AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING PAVING AND DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID PROPERTY AS TO THE COST
THEREOF, AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR,
AND AS TO THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY
ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED
THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has, by Resolution No. 92-16 , determined that it is
necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of•the
county, and particularly as to those living, working, and
owning -property within the area described hereafter, that
paving and drainage improvements be made to; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an
assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to
the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 11-46, Indian River County Code, requires
that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and
place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or
any other persons interested therein may appear before the
Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety
and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements,
as to -the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor,
and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each
property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission
chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour
of 9:05 A.M. on Tuesday. February 25 1992, at which time
the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other
interested persons may appear before said Commission and
be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and
60
RESOLUTION NO. 92-17
the properties to be specially benefited are more
particularly described upon the assessment plat and the
assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said
improvements and the special assessments against the
properties to be specially benefited may review the
assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the
assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said
improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the
office of the Clerk to the Board any week day from 8:30
A.M. until 5:00 P.M.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall
be given by the Department of Public Works by two
publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a
week apart. The last publication shall be at least one
week prior to the
date of the hearing.
The
Indian River
County Department
of Public Works shall
give
the owner of
each property to be specially assessed at least ten days
notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be
served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such
property owners at his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Scurlock , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Wheeler , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this -2g_ day of _ Januar
- , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
CAROL K. EGG ,
Chai n
61
J A � ,ROOK Fnuc "J
RESOLUTIONS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PAVING & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO A
PORTION OF THE ROADS IN FLORAL PARK SUBDIVISION AND RANCH ESTATES
SUBDIVISION AND SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/21/92:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrato
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.
Public Works Direct
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E.
County Engineer
FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, ET
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage
Improvements to a Portion of the Roads in Floral Park
Subdivision, and Ranch Estates Subdivisions and Set Date
for Public Hearing
DATE: January 21, 1992
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The County Pubic Works Department has received a petition for a
Public improvement assessment for road paving and drainage
improvements for a portion of the roads in Floral Park Subdivision,
and Ranch Estates Subdivisions. This petition was received in
February, 1986 and 51% of the property owners have signed the
petition.
A separate resolution will need to be adopted to hold a Public
Hearing to discuss the advisability, cost and amount of the
assessment against each property owner.
A portion of the roads in Floral Park Subdivision, 57th Avenue and
42nd Street, are being presented to the Board at this time. The
legal descriptions are shown in the Providing Resolution. 56th
Avenue is not included due to the fact that the owner of the
property on the east side of 56th Avenue is in the process of
developing a Site Plan and will be required to donate right-of-way
along the 56th Avenue corridor. The benefited area and assessment
roll for 56th Avenue will be determined when the determination
regarding the Site Plan on 56th Avenue is made. We will be
requesting a St. Johns River Water Management Permit for all
construction in Floral Park Subdivision, at this time however.
The Public Hearing, for a portion of Floral Park Subdivision, and
Ranch Estates Subdivision has been scheduled for Tuesday, February
25, 1991 at 9:05 A.M. in the County Commission Chambers.
An assessment roll and plat has been prepared and filed with the
Clerk to the Board.
The total estimated
five percent (75%)
ro erty owners.
cost of the project is $221,691.87. Seventy -
of this cost ($166,268.90) will be paid by the
62
RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING
It is recommended that motions be made to:
1) Adopt the resolution providing for the paving and drainage
improvements for the projects subject to the terms outlined in
the resolution. The applicable interest rate shall be
established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time
the final assessment roll is approved.
2) Allocate $221,691.87 from the Petition Paving Account #173-
214-541-035.39.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-18, providing for certain paving and
drainage improvements to a portion of Floral Park
Subdivision and Ranch Estates Subdivision, etc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-19, setting a time and place at which the
owners of property in a portion of Floral Park
Subdivision and Ranch Estates Subdivision may appear
before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard,
etc.
63
JAN 28 1992 BOOK 83
Providing (First Reso.)
BOOK Ue� F,�,'E 44,2
2/20/91(ENG)RESI.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 18
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO A
PORTION OF FLORAL PARK SUBDIVISION, AND RANCH
ESTATES SUBDIVISION, PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED
COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF
ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE
AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED.
WHEREAS, the County Public Works Department has been
petitioned for Road Paving and Drainage Improvements for a portion
of Floral Park Subdivision, and Ranch Estates Subdivision.
WHEREAS, the construction of paving and drainage
improvements by special assessment funding is authorized by Section
11-21, 11-22, -and 11-41, Indian River County Code of Laws and
Ordinances; and cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls
have been completed by the Public Works Department; and the total
estimated cost of the proposed paving and drainage improvements is
TWO HUNDRED TWENTY ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED NINETY ONE DOLLARS AND
EIGHTY-SEVEN CENTS ($221,691.871; and
WHEREAS, the special assessment provided hereunder shall,
for any given record owner of property within the area specially
benefited, be in an amount equal to that proportion of seventy-five
percent (75%) of the total cost of the project (S166.268.90) which
the number of square footage owned by the given owner bears to the
total number of square footage within the areas specially benefited
and twenty-five percent (25%) of the total cost of the project
(555,422.97) will come from Petition Paving Account; and
WHEREAS, the special assessment shall become due and
payable at the Office of the Tax Collector of Indian River County
ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special
assessment pursuant to Section 11-47, Indian River County Code of
Laws and Ordinances; and
64
_I
No. 92 -
WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said
ninety (90) day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at
a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time
of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable
in two (2) equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12)
months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly;
and
WHEREAS, after examination of the nature and anticipated
usage of the proposed improvements, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that the following described
properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these
improvements, to wit:
Lots 1 thru 12, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lots 6
thru 12, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 3; Lot 1,
Block 4; Lots 7 thru 12, Block 4; Ranch Estates
Subdivision, Plat Book 4, Page 92 of the Public
Records of Indian River County.
Lots 1 thru 13, Block A; Lots 1 thru 10, Block B;
Lot 22, Block B; Floral Park Subdivision, Plat Book
5, Page 20 of the Public Records of Indian River
County.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in
their entirety.
2. A project providing for paving and drainage
improvements to a portion of Floral Park Subdivision, and Ranch
Estates Subdivision; heretofore designated as Public Works Project
No. 8 610 is hereby approved subject to the terms outlined above - and
all applicable requirements of Section 11-41, et seq. Indian River
County Code of Laws and Ordinances.
65
JAN 28 1992
BOOK b F,r,��
F_
mor 8b F,1U-E 44
No. 92-18
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Scurlock who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Bird and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye -
Vice -Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and
adopted this 28 day of January , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
CAROLYN . EGGERT, airman
Attest:
JEF TON, Clerk
�9d4 Appr;ved JJaie
Adrnirl
Legal _2
Budget
Eng.
Dept
Rlsk Mgr. /
66
z
Time and Place (Second Reso.)
2/20/91(ENG)RES2.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 92-19
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS
OF PROPERTY IN A PORTION OF FLORAL PARR
SUBDIVISION, AND RANCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION AND
OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY APPEAR BEFORE THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD AS
TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING
PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID
PROPERTY AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE
MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE
AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED
AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has, by Resolution No. 92-18, determined that it is
necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the
county, and particularly as to those living, working, and
owning property within the area described hereafter, that
paving and drainage improvements be made to; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an
assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to
the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 11-46, Indian River County Code, requires
that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and
place at which the owners of the properties to be assessed or
any other persons interested therein may appear before the
Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to the propriety
and advisability of making paving and drainage improvements,
as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of payment therefor,
and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against each
property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission
chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour
of _9:05 A.M. on Tuesday February 25 1992, at which time
the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other
interested persons may appear before said Commission and
be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved
67
JAN, 281992 moK 85
A r- 1114C
2,
RESOLUTION NO. 92-19
and the properties to be specially benefited are more
particularly described upon the assessment plat and the
assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said
improvements and the special assessments against the
properties to be specially benefited may review the
assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the
assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said
improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the
Office of the Clerk to the Board any week day from 8:30
A.M. until 5:00 P.M.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall
be given by the Department of Public Works by two
publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a
week apart. The last publication shall be at least one
week prior to the date of the hearing. The Indian River
County Department of Public Works shall give, the owner of
each property to be specially assessed at least ten days
notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be
served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such
property -owners at his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
—Scurlock—, and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Bird , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this _28 day of _ january , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
CAROLY R. EGGE
Chai n
68
SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE SECOND IS - CONSERVATION EASEMENT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/22/92:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
TEEROUGB: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director,
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.ij ��
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Sandridge Golf Course Second 18
Conservation Easement
DATE: January 22, 1992
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Prior to initiating any wetland or mitigation construction
on the Second 18 of Sandridge Golf Course, the County must
record a Conservation Easement for wetland areas that must
be retained as a condition of the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJRWMD) Permit.
Attached is a Grant of Conservation Easement to the SJRWMD.
Staff is currently working on Exhibit A which will describe
this easement.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the Chairman be authorized to execute
the Conservation Easement as soon as Exhibit .A has been
attached and approved by the County Attorney.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, that the Board authorize the
Chairman to execute the Conservation Easement as soon
as Exhibit A has been attached and approved by the County
Attorney.
Under discussion, Commissioner Scurlock stated that he
understood that the problem on Exhibit A is just a legal question.
Apparently, we have identified what it is that we want to conserve
and it is just a matter of trying to work out a legal description
and matching it with the drawing. He further understood that this
is to meet the 2-1 mitigation effort for disturbing wetlands.
Commissioner Bowman inquired whether this was mitigation or
preservation, and Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that it
is preservation rather than mitigation. It will be an enhancement
to an existing area.
JAN 28'092,
II
Fr -
JAN 28 t-99"'
BoorE 4 4 -
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion
was voted on and carried unanimously.
CONSERVATION EASEMENT WILL BE PLACED ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CLERIC TO THE BOARD WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED AND RECEIVED
TREASURE SHORES PARK PHASE I - CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 AND FINAL
PAYMENT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/22/92:
TO: James E. Chandler, DATE: January 22, 1992
County Administrator
TMWUGR: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Direct
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Treasure Shores Park Phase I
Change Order No. 2 and
Final Payment
DESCRIPTION'AND CONDITIONS
Construction of Treasure Shores Park is now complete.
Attached is Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $1,073.60
for extra work that was requested by the County to complete
the project.
Schopke Construction is requesting final payment including
retainage in the amount of $40,873.07.
REC0flbMMT1CNS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the Board authorize Change Order No. 2
in the amount of $1,073.60 which results in a revised
= Contract amount of $399,068.29.
Staff also recommends that final payment including the 10%
retainage be released. Funding is from account
311-210-572-066.51.
Commissioner Bird reminded everyone of the grand opening of
the Treasure Shores Park on February 13, 1992 at 4:00 o'clock P.M.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $1,073.60 and final
payment including the release of 10% retainage, as
recommended by staff.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO
THE BOARD
70
RESOLUTIONS - WATER SERVICE PROJECT IN FLORIDACRES SUBDIVISION
(36TH AVE. SOUTH OF STH ST.)
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/13/92:
DATE: JANUARY 13, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRA OR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UT LI SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF AS PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER SERVICE PROJECT IN FLORIDACRES SUBDIVISION
(36TH AVENUE - SOUTH OF 8TH STREET)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -91 -04 -DS
RESOLUTIONS I AND II
BACKGROUND
On October 22, 1991, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved the petition for water service in Floridacres
Subdivision (36th Avenue, south of 8th Street). Design service has
been completed by the Department of Utility Services staff. We are
now ready to begin the assessment process associated with this
project. (See attached agenda item and minutes.)
ANALYSIS
a Attached are Resolutions I and II for the assessment project. The
cost per square foot is $0.07023759966, and the project will serve
14 platted lots bordering on 36th Avenue.
The subdivision contains 16 lots owned by 16 owners. Two of the
lots on 8th Street and are included in the 12th Street Water Service
Project presently under construction; therefore, 14 lots shall
benefit from this project. The 10 property owners signing the
petition represent 71.43% of the properties to be served. All of
the lots in this project are slightly over*one acre:in size. All of
the lots in this project presently have septic tanks and wells, with
which the property owners have concerns regarding potential health
hazards.
The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment
project. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $440206. This
project is to be paid through the assessment of property owners
along the proposed water line route. In the interim, financing will
be through the use of impact fee funds.
RECOrIlETDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Resolutions I and
II and set the public hearing date.
71
JAN 28 1992 BOOK 8 5 F 449
r
jAH 28 992
goo j F�,.r, F_ 4 5 0
Commissioner Wheeler asked why this wasn't extended down
to Suburban Acres, and Utilities Director Terry Pinto
explained that this was brought in by petition by the
residents of the area. We will be going into that area with
the next phase. When an area comes in with a petition, it
only moves us faster into that area.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-20, providing for a water main
extension in Floridacres (36th Avenue) providing the
total estimated cost, method of payment of
assessments, number of annual installments, and
legal description of the area specifically served.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-21, setting a time and place at which
the owners of properties located on 36th Avenue in
Floridacres may appear before the Board of County
Commissioners and be heard, etc.
72
_I
_Providing (First Reso. 1/16/92(legal)Vk/DC
RESOLUTION NO. 92-, 2 0
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A WATER MAIN
EXTENSION IN FLORIDACRES (36TH AVENUE);
PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST,
METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER
OF ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA SPECIFICALLY
SERVED.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has determined that the improvements herein described are
necessary to promote the public welfare of the county and has deter-
mined to defray the cost thereof by special assessments against certain
properties in Floridacres (36th Avenue) to be serviced by a water main
extension, hereinafter referred to as Project No. UW -91 -04 -DS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that . a waterline shall be
installed in 14 properties, which are located along 36th Avenue in
Floridacres, and the cost thereof shall be specially assessed in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 11-41 through 11-47 of
the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Indian River County.
2. The total estimated project assessment cost of the above-described
improvements is shown to be $0.07023759966 per square foot to be
paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the
assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services.
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.07023759966 per square
foot shall be assessed against each of the properties designated on
the assessment plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by
action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public
hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced
County Code.
4. The special assessments shall be due and payable and may be paid
in full within 90 days after the date of the resolution of the Board
with respect
to credits against
the
special assessments after
completion of
the improvements
( the
"Credit Date") without
interest.
VIN
BOOK
� 9 ` 992'
�5 F',: E45rr
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 2 0
If not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten
equal yearly installments of principal plus interest. If not paid
when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the
principal not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special
assessments shall bear interest at a rate of 9-3/4% from the Credit
Date until paid.
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services a
plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications, and
an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of these
are open to inspection by the public at the Department of Utility
Services.
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall t
promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County
Utility Services Department shall cause this resolution to be pub-
lished at least one time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the
public hearing required by Section 11-46.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
, and the motion was seconded by Commissioner W h e P l P r ,
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 28 day of January , 1992.
Attest:
Je K..-$apton Clerk
47
74
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By dw��� 3 ".,p .1 , .Yt,
Ca#lyn K.
Wt
ClMirman
-Time and Place (Second Res 1/16/92(legal)Vk/DG
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 21
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH
THE OWNERS OF PROPERTIES LOCATED ON 36TH
AVENUE IN FLORIDACRES MAY APPEAR BEFORE
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE
HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABIL-
ITY OF CONSTRUCTING A WATER MAIN EXTEN-
SION, AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE
MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO
THE AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY
ASSESSED AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED
THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has, by Resolution No 9 2 - 2 0 , determined that it is necessary
for the public welfare of the citizens of the county, and particularly as
to those living, working, and owning property within the area
described hereafter, that a waterline be installed in approximately 14
properties hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially
assessed with respect thereto shall be $0.07023759966 per square foot;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an
assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board;
and
WHEREAS, Section 11-46, Indian River County Code, requires that
the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a time and place at which
the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons
interested therein
may appear
before . the
Board of County
Commissioners and
be heard as to
the propriety
and, advisability of
constructing such water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to
the manner of payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be
assessed against each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County
Commission
shall meet at
the County
Commission
Chambers in
the County
Administration
Building at
the hour of
9:05 a.m. on Tuesday, February 25, 1992, at which time the
75
JAN 28 1992 MOK
�,.. ®�
BOOK C::e� F.+UC 4C.:"3
owners of the properties to be assessed and any other interested
persons may appear before said Commission and be heard in regard
thereto. The area to be improved and the properties to be
specially benefited are more particularly described upon the
assessment plat and the assessment roll with regard to the special
assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and
the special assessments against the properties to be specially
benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be
assessed, the assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said
improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the office of
the Department of Utility Services any week day from 8:30 a.m.
until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given
by two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper one week
apart. The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the
date of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of
Utility Services shall give the owner of each property to be
specially assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time
and place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice
to each of such property owners at his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
S c u r l o c k , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner W h e e l e r ,
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler A y e
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this,. 2 8 day of January_, 1992.
A ,
Attest: A
• i
Jeffr.gy K. Barton, Clerk
.C.
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
76
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By � /t/- L,4�
Caro K. Egg
Chai man
in f,n river vJ APv ave'
oat:
i-Zo-gz
PURCHASE OF PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE SOUTH COUNTY R.O. WATER
FACILITY (NURSERY OWNED BY HOSKINS AND TRENCHING INC.)
Chairman Eggert announced that she previously declared a
conflict of interest on this matter in October, 1991, which
states: "A purchase agreement for Oslo Road Nursery is made
out to Karl Heinz Eggert and Oslo Road Nursery, Inc. by
Trenching, Inc. and Robert A. Hoskins, the current owner. At
the time of my husband's death, the purchase agreement came
fully to me. It occupies a second position behind a bank
loan." Chairman Eggert advised that following the
established policy, she would turn the meeting over to Vice
Chairman Bowman and leave the room while this item was being
discussed and voted on. (CONFLICT OF INTEREST IS ON FILE IN
THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD).
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/17/92:
DATE: JANUARY 17, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATO
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILI SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAMO'ECTS
AND STAFFED CAPITAL GINEER
BY: DEPAR UTI TY SERVICES
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO -THE SOUTH COUNTY
R.O. FACILITY (THE NURSERY OWNED BY HOSKINS AND
TRENCHe�.INC . )
BACKGROUND
On October 15, 1991, the staff of the Department of Utility Services
went before the Board of County Commissioners for approval to
negotiate and purchase a 9.81 acre tract of land referenced above.
(See attached agenda item package.) During the meeting with the
Board of County Commissioners, we were instructed to proceed with
appraisals and negotiations on the nursery parcel as well as three
additional properties shown on the attached Exhibit A. . (See
attached October 15, 1991 minutes.) We have received appraisals on
the nursery parcel and the 3.1 acre parcel bordering Oslo Road;
however, we have been delayed on the other parcels, due to problems
with the survey and existing buildings on these parcels. Due to the
upcoming foreclosure action currently underway against the nursery
property, we wish to proceed with the purchase of this parcel
immediately.
77
JAN 28 19 2-
ANALYSIS
Attached please find the recent appraisals of the properties with an
appraisal of $393,000.00. We are seeking approval to accept an
offer of $340,000.00 on this property immediately. We are proposing
to ignore the value of personal property on the= -parcel, except as
outlined on the attached memo to James Chandler, dated January 16,
1992.
Again, due to the imminent foreclosure on this property, we are
requesting authorization to proceed with the immediate purchase of
this -property.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services requests
authorization to accept the offer of $340,000.00 for the 9.81
nursery parcel and proceed with its purchase.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED
by Commissioner Bird, that the Board approve staff's
recommendation to authorize the acceptance of the
offer of $340,000 for the 9.81 nursery parcel and
proceed with its purchase.
Under discussion, Commissioner Scurlock stated that he had
several questions on the need to acquire additional property. One
question is whether we can fit the wastewater treatment plant on
the existing site. He asked that question of the consultants
during a previous meeting and their answer was "yes, the entire 6 -
million -gallons -per -day plant would fit on the existing site. In
fact, the consultants indicated to him again just yesterday that
the entire 6 -million -gallons -per -day facility could be located on
the existing site and meet all site plan requirements including
buffer. He would like some more information as to why we need to
purchase a $500,000 piece of property when we meet all site plan
requirements not only for the existing facility that is being
constructed but also for the facility at build out, storage
included.
Utilities Director Terry Pinto advised that both of the
engineers who were working on our master plan at the time, Camp
Dresser McKee (CDM) and Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, have
submitted a letter to us with their views on the issue. Both
engineers have said they can locate the wastewater treatment plant
on that site, but there are a couple of things we have to look at
78
M s .
when residential development starts to take place next door. He
could almost guarantee that we will run into major problems with
residential being so close to a water treatment plant and a
wastewater treatment plant. The second thing we have to look at is
the required storage. We are projecting that we won't have to
provide 18 million gallons of storage, but if we do, the
arrangement of the tank farm on the existing property will be a
problem. Without the additional property, we may not be able to
meet the planning and zoning buffers. As far as the water plant is
concerned, the additional property would put us into a much better
position for, location of wells. Post Buckley's letter talks about
the ability to locate wells on the property that we are purchasing.
There is a mitigation requirement for wells on the existing site.
If the adjacent property is still privately owned, we are going to
have to provide some alternative well source. If we acquire that
property, we anticipate using one of those wells as a monitoring
well and probably closing off the other one. Director Pinto
recommended very strongly that we purchase the property.
Commissioner Wheeler reported that he has received calls about
the sulphur odors coming from the water plant and wondered if this
was going to relieve that problem.
Director Pinto stated that it would not, and pointed out the
greater impact if residential develops even closer.
Commissioner Scurlock felt the real question is whether the
rate payers on the system can afford all these nice things that
would be nice to have, because the cost of this acquisition still
relates back to rates. He recalled that when he sat in on the
selection committee with CDM, they indicated that they could site
it on the existing site without any additional land. Yes, there
are going to be some requirements for reuse and storage that were
never contemplated for this site; in fact, they have specifically
contemplated offsite.
Proceeding to his next question regarding the purchase of the
additional property, Commissioner Scurlock questioned the appraisal
of $393,500, when the Property Appraiser's Office carries it at a
just value of $1911000, which he understands is supposed to be 85%
of the market value. He recalled that when we acquired the Hanson
property on 27th Avenue and Oslo Road for a park site 3 years ago,
we paid $18,848 an acre. He admitted that it was a larger track
with 76 acres, but most of it was zoned LD -2 except for some
portions along Oslo Road. Apparently the subject property has been
on the market for quite some time.
79
JA1 BOOK �. ,t e
Director Pinto advised that the Utilities Department is
directed to have the property appraised by a professional firm, and
this is handled by the County's Right-of-way Agent.
Don Finney, County Right-of-way Agent, advised that the
subject property was appraised by an outside firm in 1990 at
$330,000.
Commissioner Scurlock asked if that appraisal was with or
without a business, and Director Pinto advised that the appraisal
did not include the nursery.
Continuing, Mr. Finney stated that more recently we had this
reappraised by another outside firm and they appraised it at
$393,500, which was for the land and the improvements. The
improvement value was roughly $42,000. Mr. Finney felt that it is
absolutely correct that we cannot look at our past government
purchases as an indicator of sales or to the market value. In
looking at the high appraisal of $393,500, we are saying that the
RS -6 property is roughly $20,000 per acre and the CH (Heavy
Commercial) property which fronts on Oslo Road is $56,000 an acre.
Commissioner Wheeler asked if Commissioner Scurlock was saying
that the appraisal was too high, and Commissioner Scurlock stated
that he was just saying that the Property Appraiser's Office has it
at $191,000 and that he has some questions as to whether it is
worth $393,500 in today's market.
Commissioner Wheeler looked at this as not only protecting our
interest but eliminating problems up front, because it is very
likely that we would end up spending a lot of money trying to
correct problems as residential develops around us.
Commissioner Scurlock agreed and stated he was in favor of a
bigger footprint, but stressed that CDM has said that we could
locate it on the existing property and if the consultants now need
the additional property, why isn't that in some master plan.
A heated debate ensued about why CDM didn't recommend another
location back when we could have gone further west and purchased
land at a more reasonable cost.
Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that if we do have a need to
acquire more land, Hanson has more acreage available at $20,000 an
acre. It doesn't have frontage, but perhaps we don't need frontage
to mitigate odor problems.
Commissioner Bowman didn't feel that buffering would make all
that difference with regard to odor and felt we would be better off
spending that money to have more technical equipment to control the
odor.
s0
Director Pinto admitted that this buffering would not control
the odor but would put some space between the plants and the
residential.
In answer to Commissioner Scurlock's inquiry on obtaining
clear title, Administrator Chandler assured him that this would be
handled the same as any other property the County acquires; if we
cannot get clear title, we simply don't close.
After another round of lengthy debate on the advantages and
disadvantages of acquiring additional land, Commissioner Bird felt
the two main questions on the price and the need had been
addressed. He didn't feel that the prices were out of line, but as
far as whether we need to.acquire and whether it would be prudent
for us in the long haul, he really has to rely heavily on staff,
and they are recommending the purchase of the additional property.
VICE CHAIRMAN BOWMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The
Motion to approve the purchase as recommended by
staff failed by a vote of 2-2, Commissioners
Scurlock and Bowman dissenting.
SOUTH COUNTY WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND REUSE WATER
TRANSMISSION SYSTEM - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN AND WORK
AUTHORIZATION NO. 2
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/15/92:
DATE: JANUARY 15, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILIT SERVICES
PREPARED ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E. -K)
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING DESIGN AND WORK AUTHORIZATION
NO. 2 — SOUTH COUNTY WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND
REUSE WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS-90-25-CS/ED-
On July 16, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners authorized the
firm of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., to engage in the design,
permitting, project administration, and inspection of the South
County Wastewater Treatment Plant Project (Work Authorization No.
1). The Department of Utility Services has developed a scope of
services (Work Authorization No. 2) for the consultant to analyze
the existing collection system. The existing collection system will
later be redirected to the proposed location of the new WWTP
facility at Oslo Road (9th Street, SW).
81
A h I
ANALYSIS
In Task 100, the existing collection system shall be analyzed as to
its pump and pipe size. It also will be redefined by route and
direction of flow to deliver the wastewater flow to the south.
Simultaneously, the consultant will work on planning and the ,
preliminary design of the disposal/reuse water transmission main.
The possibility of an agreement with the City of Vero Beach, as a -
potential large user, to receive the reuse water will be
investigated and is a part of this Work Authorization in Task 200.
Task 300 - Special Meetings, which requires the:;:consultant as a
technical specialist, is proposed in this Work Authorization with an
upper limit on an as needed basis.
Task -100 and 200 (Cost element No. 1) $45,260.00
Task 300, as needed basis with upper limit 5.000.0o
Total requested for approval $5
0,260.00
This study shall be funded through sewer impact fees. This
collection and disposal system would not be duplicated in the Master
Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends the
approval of Work Authorization 2 and authorizes the chairman of the
Board of County Commissioners to execute the engineering agreement
with Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by
Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert having left the room
temporarily) approved Engineering Services Work
Authorization No. 2 with Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.,
as recommended by staff.
ENGINEERING SERVICES WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 2 IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
REMOVAL OF ROSELAND PLAZA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/16/92:
_z
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILI VICES
STAFFED AND
PREPARED BY: NOEL J.
ENVIROAL SPECIALIST
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF ROSELAND PLAZA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
82
_� --7 1I i
The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, on November
19, 1991, authorized the Department of Utility Services to negotiate
with a vendor for the removal of the Roseland Plaza Wastewater
Treatment Plant (see attached minutes). Three vendors who move,
install, and maintain both new and used wastewater treatment plants,
and two scrap dealers were contacted.
,ANALYSIS:
Scrap dealers will not take scrap steel unless it is cut up in small
sections. If they have to cut up the material, the cost is about
$100 per ton. This plant has a total weight of 9 tons. Two of the
_ three vendors who work with treatment plants expressed no interest
in the plant. One vendor, Allen Environmental Services, has agreed
to dismantle, load, and transport the Roseland Plaza Wastewater
Treatment Plant. In lieu of monetary compensation, the vendor will
receive the treatment plant at no cost to the County (see attached
Contract Agreement).
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the Contract Agreement for the
removal of the Roseland Plaza Wastewater Treatment Plant, and
authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to
execute the Contract Agreement.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert having left the room
temporarily) approved the Contract Agreement with
Allen Environmental Equipment, Inc. for removal of
the Roseland Plaza Wastewater Treatment Plant.
CONTRACT AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE
BOARD
OSLO ROAD FORCE MAIN REDESIGN AND VISTA PROPERTIES WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITIES SEWER INTERCONNECTION
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/17/92:
83
p, r
�; ��,i. r.�.
JAN 28 1991",
DATE: JANUARY 17, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINIS
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILI VICES
PREPARED WILLIAM ii �S�N
AND STAFFED CAPIT CTS ENGINEER
BY: DEPAR F UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: OSLO ROAD FORCE MAIN REDESIGN AND VISTA PROPERTIES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES SEWER INTERCONNECTION
BACKGROUND
In a developers agreement between Indian River County and the group
proposing the:Oslo Road shopping center at 27th Avenue and Oslo Road,
the firm of Masteller and Moler, Inc., designed an 8" force main to
serve the proposed project. The design was completed approximately
eighteen months,ago. This was in advance of the decision to construct
the South County Wastewater Treatment Plant on Oslo Road. As a result
of this decision, the aforementioned line must be enlarged to
accommodate the flows to the proposed plant site. We do not anticipate
the developer constructing this line. However, we are now proposing to
Put Masteller and Moler, Inc., under contract to modify the existing
plans and construct the line ourselves. Along with the modification of
the Oslo Road plans, we wish to have Masteller and Moler, Inc., do the
design for the connection of the Thompson Elementary School, Holiday
Village Mobile Home Park and the Vista Properties wastewater plants to
our system. The school and the mobile home park are being connected
due to the existing agreements for sewer service with the County and
will be connected to the Oslo Road force main. The Vista plants are
being interconnected to add more system flexibility; i.e.
connect them in a manner which will allow us to send additionalwflowlll to
them or at some future date remove them from service and deliver their
flow to our regional system.
ANALYSIS
Based on our interpretation of CCNA guidelines, we are able to utilize
the firm of Masteller and Moler,-=Inc., for this= project, due to the
fact that they have already designed the Oslo Road project as stated
above in the Background.
Attached is a breakdown of engineering costs relative to each work
item. Please note that the original design costs relative to the Oslo
'Road force main design have been deducted from overall engineering fees
associated with "Task All. The total estimated construction cost under
"Task A" is $480,000.00. The engineering cost will be $20,490.00, with
3% of the contract construction cost for inspection services that will
not exceed $14,400.00. The total estimated construction cost for "Task
B" (Vista Properties connection) is $150,000.00; the engineering costs
wil be $12,150.00, with 3.7% of construction for inspection services
at t5,550.00. (See attached work authorization and cost breakdown
exhibit.)
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve for signature the attached
contract with Masteller and Moler, Inc.
84
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously (4-0,
Commissioner Eggert having left the room
temporarily) approved the Agreement for Professional
Services with Masteller and Moler, Inc., as
recommended by staff.
SAID AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
Chairman Eggert returned to the Meeting at this point and took
over the gavel from Vice Chairman Bowman.
TWO SUBORDINATION AGREEMENTS OF UTILITY LIENS
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/27/92:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
,--,v
_4g�,� P
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: January 27, 1992
RE: EMERGENCY ADDITION OF TWO
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENTS
OF UTILITY LIENS
Commissioner Scurlock has asked our office to add an agreement to
today's agenda which would subordinate the County's first lien for
payment of a water main extension special assessment in the amount of
$926.20, so that the property owner can refinance his first mortgage.
The Utilities Department has no objection to this subordination, since in
the event of non-payment water services will. be stopped.
After Commissioner Scurlock's request, Steve Henderson made a similar
request for' his client, Alan Schommer. The amount of Mr. Schommer's
lien is not easily determinable, since there is a larger piece of property
on which there is a floating amount of ERUs . This subordination
agreement will ensure that the County's lien is subordinate to a new
first being put ox� some improvements on the property.
The attorneys for each applicant have prepared the relevant
subordination agreements, and the Utilities Department has no objection
to the Board's executing the subordination of the special assessment
lien or having Mr. Chandler execute the subordination of the impact fee
extension lien. (Mr. Chandler executed the initial lien agreement, so
he should execute its subordination.)
85
JAN 1992ap�K F..,�:
I
a00K 40
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved
a Subordinate of Impact Fee Lien for Alan R.
Schommer and authorized the Chairman's signature,
and approved a Subordinate of Impact Fee Lien for
Mark and April Johnson, and authorized the County
Administrator's signature, as recommended by staff.
COPIES OF SUBORDINATION OF IMPACT FEE LIENS ARE ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
CHILDREN'S SERVICES STRAW BALLOT
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 1/21/92:
TO: Board of County DATE: FILE:
January 21, 1992
Commissioners
SUBJECT: Children's Services
Straw Ballot
FROM: Carolyn K. Eggert 04E REFERENCES:
Chairman, Children's Services
Advisory Committee
On Thursday, January 16, 1992 the Children's Services
Advisory Committee members voted unanimously not to have a straw
ballot in November, 1992.
A number of community leaders have voiced concerns that
because of the economy and the short time for county -wide
education on the issue, the referendum will fail and the future
of children's services will be badly damaged.
The Governor's Constituency members, School Superintendent
Gary Norris and other community leaders would like to put
together a broad-based group, such as was done for the school
bond referendum, to work toward:
a. Convincing the Commission to create a Children's
Department or Social Services Department without a
referendum
or
b. Having a referendum or straw ballot sometime in the
future when the economy is better and voters are better
informed on the issue.
86
r77
The Board agreed with the position of the Children's Services
Advisory Committee not to have a straw ballot in November, 1992.
MAIN LIBRARY - FIRST ANNIVERSARY
Chairman Eggert wished to remind everyone that the first
anniversary of the opening of the Main Library will be celebrated
on Saturday, February 1, 1992, at 1:00 p.m.
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SURFACE WATER IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT
(SWIM) PROGRAM
Commissioner Wheeler advised that the MANWAC recommended that
we pass a resolution to keep the SWIM funds in the budget. He
agreed that the SWIm funds are a priority and believed there are
other places to cut the budget.
Commissioner Bowman advised that with $4,000 they did a whole
new surface water management thing up in Dale Wjmbrow Park and
another in Sebastian at Riverview where all the surface water was
going into the river. A lot has been done with a little bit of
money.
Commissioner Wheeler added that projects have been done at
Round Island Park and boat launching sites.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by
Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-22, supporting the Surface Water
Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program.
87
BOOK +`" A, -
,') F b
I
JAV 2 { T;;
Resolution No. 92- 22
BOOK �c� F' �r 6
,A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUPPORTING THE SURFACE WATER
IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SWIM) PROGRAM. -
WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature enacted the Surface Water
Improvement and Management (SWIM) Act in 1987 which directed the
water management districts, state agencies and local governments to
implement plans for improvement and management of the state's
priority surface water bodies; and
WHEREAS, the Indian River Lagoon was declared a SWIM priority
water body; and
WHEREAS, a management plan for the Lagoon was adopted in
September 1989; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the Indian River Lagoon watershed lies
within the boundaries of_ Indian River County and significantly
contributes to the aesthetic, ecological and economic values of our
community; and
WHEREAS, SWIM funded projects have provided assistance to
Indian River County, through the initiation of major programs in the
areas of water quality monitoring; mapping of seagrass, sediments,
land use, and stormwater outfalls; reconnecting impounded marshes
to the Lagoon; correcting failed septic and stormwater systems;
providing resource planning tools; and establishing public
awareness and education activities; and
WHEREAS, the continued funding of the SWIM program and the
establishment of a permanent funding source will result in the
successful continuation and completion of projects designed to
preserve and restore the state's valuable surface waters such as
the Indian River Lagoon system;
88
r
_I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Indian River County
Board of County Commissioners respectfully requests that the
legislature continue the SWIM program and establish a permanent
funding source for this most worthwhile -endeavor.
The -foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Scurlock and the motion was seconded by.Commissioner
Wheeler , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice -Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye
Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 28 day of January , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Chairm Carolyn Eggert
ATTEST
Jefi y K: Bar on, Co my Clerk
. e .
APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS:
�o2bert_lr. eati , -AXY
Community Devel pme Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins
Deputy County Attorney
u\r\c\swim.resl
89
JANr3 1992 BOOK
Pr -
i
SOUTH COUNTY FIRE AND NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICTS
The Chairman announced that immediately upon adjournment, the
Board would reconvene sitting first as the District Board of Fire
Commissioners of the South Indian River County Fire District and
following that meeting, sitting as the Commissioners of the North
Indian River County Fire District. Those Minutes are being
prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:10 o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
Je y R. Barton, Clerk
r
90
Caroly Egger , Chairman
W