HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/2015 Impact Fee Update Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. TampaOffice-Headquarters
1000 N.Ashley Drive,Suite 400
Planning and Engineering Tampa,FL 33602 1 (813)224-8862
June 6, 2014
Mr. Phil Matson
Indian River County MPO Staff Director
180127th Street, Building A
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Re: Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Dear Mr. Matson:
Enclosed is the Final Technical Report of the Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study. In
addition to the data and analysis provided in our April 14, 2014 report, this report includes the
following:
• Finalized residential fee schedules. The final fee schedules for residential land uses
includes one more tier for the single family detached residential land use to reflect
relatively lower impact of smaller homes.
• Educational facilities impact fee analysis is finalized and included in Section X of the
report.
• Hi-Cube (Automated) Warehouse land use is added to the fee schedule to reflect lower
impact of this land use compared to traditional warehouses.
• Several implementation issues are addressed on pages 6 through 10 of this report.
• Calculations for administrative fee are included in Appendix H.
The following table provides a comparison of staff recommended levels of updated residential
fees to the current adopted fees for all program areas combined. As presented, the fee
decreases for almost all of the land uses with the exception of a slight increase for the single
family land use with 1,000 to 1,499 square feet and multi-family land use. These minor
increases are due to updates to the demand component and introducing a new tiered-category
in the case of single family homes.
Tampa • Orlando • Bartow • Ft.Lauderdale • Baltimore • wvvw.tindaleoliver.com
3
Mr.Phil Matson
Page 2 of 2
Total(All Fees)*
ITE LUC Land Use Unit 2009 Full Percent
Adopted Calculated Change
Rate
RESIDENTIAL
Single Famildetached
-Less than 1,000 sf du $7,519 $7,175 -4.6%
210 -1,000 to 1,499 sf du $7,519 $7,763 3.2%
-1,500 to 2,499 sf du $9,388 $8,623 -8.2%
-2,500 sf or lar er du $10,195 $9,681 -5.0%
220 IMulti-Family/Accessory Unit du $4,816 $4,936 2.5%
240 IMobile Home/RV tied down du $4,455 $4,101 -7.99/.
* Includes administrative fee
Source: Appendix K,Table K-1
If you have any questions or comments concerning this report, please do not hesitate to
contact me or Nilgun Kamp. It has been our pleasure to have worked with the County and
School District staff on this important project.
Sincerely,
Steven A.Tindale, P.E.,AICP
President
Tampa • Orlando • Bartow • Ft.Lauderdale • Baltimore • www.tindaleoliver.com
Indian River County
Impact Fee Update Study
FINAL REPORT
Executive Summary
CO
Q
�C
CRTC)
Prepared for:
Indian River County
Community Development Dept.—Planning Division
1801 27th Street, Building A
Vero Beach, FL 32960
ph (772)226-1237
June 6, 2014
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
1000 Ashley Drive, Suite 400
Tampa, FL 33602
ph (813)224-8862,fax(813)226-2106
5
Executive Summary
In response to high growth levels and the need to provide infrastructure to support this
growth, Indian River County (IRC) implemented a Transportation Impact Fee in 1986. In
2005, the County adopted impact fees in eight additional program areas. The technical
studies for all program areas were updated in 2007; however, these technical studies were
not adopted. Of the nine program areas, only the transportation impact fee was later
updated substantially in 2009 by an internally generated County update using data from the
2005 and 2007 studies, resulting in a fee reduction for almost all the land uses. The eight
non-transportation program fees were slightly modified in the 2009 update. Since then, the
County suspended the collection of five impact fee areas to promote construction during
the economic downturn, and more recently extended suspension of correctional facilities,
solid waste, and public buildings impact fees.
Indian River County has retained Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) to prepare an
update study to reflect changes to the impact fee variables for all program areas. In
addition, the direction received from the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is to
maintain the residential land uses at the current level and develop a methodology to reduce
non-residential impact fees.
To address the goal of reducing fees for non-residential land uses, TOA developed the
Affordable Growth methodology, which takes into consideration revenues received from
the existing development that will be used toward capacity expansion projects. As
population growth rates decrease, the existing development's ability to assist in absorbing
new growth's impact while maintaining the level of service (LOS) becomes more possible.
The Affordable Growth method calculates the necessary impact fee levels to maintain the
existing/achieved LOS given a certain level of non-impact fee funding at an estimated
growth rate. It is important to note that whether to fund capacity expansion projects solely
with impact fee collections or supplement them with alternative funding sources is largely a
policy decision, allowing the County to contribute or limit non-impact fee funding in its
service areas as appropriate based on its capital improvement planning goals and the
nature of its existing impact fee program.
In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established
through case law since the 1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the
"dual rational nexus" test, which requires that they:
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 ES-1 Impact Fee Update Study
• Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to
the need created by new development paying the fee; and
• Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development,
typically accomplished through a list of capacity-adding projects included in the
County's Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another
planning document/Master Plan.
In addition, one of the requirements of the 2006 Florida Impact Fee Act is that the studies
be based on most recent and localized data.
This technical report has been prepared to support legal compliance with existing case law
and statutory requirements. The methodology used in this report is consistent with that
used in the 2004 and 2005 technical reports, which are the basis of the current adopted
fees. Although the Florida courts have yet to expressly address the methodology
underpinning the Affordable Growth Strategy, this aspect of the report is based on the long-
standing legal standards described in this report. The technical report also documents the
methodology components for each of the impact fee areas, including an evaluation of the
inventory, service area, level-of-service (LOS), cost, credit, and demand components.
Information supporting this analysis was obtained from the County and other sources, as
indicated.
Three primary factors affected the County's impact fee levels:
• Since 2005, the County built additional infrastructure and increased the capital asset
inventory significantly in most program areas. This results in an increased asset
value, which in turn, increases the impact fee.
• In most infrastructure areas, the County used or is projected to use other revenue
sources to supplement impact fees, such as optional sales tax revenues, ad valorem
tax revenues, and other revenues. Depending on the program area and the level of
on-going investment, these contributions result in an increase in the credit
component for some program areas, which in turn reduces the impact fee. In
others, if the investment was made in earlier years and are not projected to
continue at the same levels, the credit may decrease compared to the previous
study, which in turn increases the impact fee.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 ES-2 Impact Fee Update Study
7
• Finally, the cost and demand components are adjusted to reflect the most recent
available data,which affects different land uses at different rates.
Given that the updated fees under the Affordable Growth method indicated a decrease for
almost all of the non-residential fee categories, which is consistent with the County's
economic development goals, the BOCC adopted the updated fees for non-residential land
uses on April 22, 2014. At that time, calculations for residential land uses were not yet
finalized due to considerations for expanding the residential land use categories and to
allow for some time to obtain the input of the School Board for the educational facilities
impact fee. This technical report includes the final calculations for residential land uses.
The following tables provide a summary of calculated fees for seven representative land
uses. These land uses include examples of calculated residential land uses as well as
adopted non-residential land uses. The complete schedule has almost 50 land uses and a
comparison of all fee categories is included in Appendices I through K. The tables include
the following:
Table ES-1 (Unincorporated County)
• Current adopted fee
• Calculated maximum impact fee
• Percent change from the current fee to the calculated fee
• The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix I.
Table ES-2 (Unincorporated County)
• Current adopted fee
• Affordable growth impact fee
• Percent change from the current fee to the affordable growth fee
• The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix J.
Table ES-3 (Preferred Alternative, Unincorporated County)
• Current adopted fee
• Staff recommended impact fee
• Percent change from the current fee to the staff recommended fee
• The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix K.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 ES-3 Impact Fee Update Study
The methodology used to develop the full calculated fees and affordable growth fees is
documented throughout this report. The staff scenarios shown in Table ES-3 as well as
Appendix K represent the County's preferred alternative and follow the affordable growth
calculations, with the exception of the following policy decisions primarily based on a
review of capital needs in the near future:
• Adoption of maximum calculated fees for emergency services
• Application of a 50-percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for public
buildings impact fees for all land uses
• Application of a 25-percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for parks and
recreation facilities impact fees for all land uses
• Suspension of the library impact fees
Of these, parks and recreation and libraries impact fees are charged only to residential land
uses while the emergency services and public buildings impact fees are charged to both
residential and non-residential land uses.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 ES-4 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County�Impart Fee Update Study
Table ES-1
Summary of Impact Fees-All Program Areas(Full Calculated Fee Rates►;Unincorporated County
RESIDENTIAL:
230 Sin Ie Famil 2,000 sf du $170 $287 68.8% $76 $146 94.7% $206 $739 258.7% $483 $700 44.9% $278 $314 12.9%
220 Multi-Fa mil/Accessor Unit du $100 $162 62.0% $67 $83 45.6% $121 $418 245.5% $285 $397 39.3% $176 $181 2.8%
NON-RESIDENTIAL:
912 Bank/Savin sDrive-In 1,000 sf $174 $425 144.3% $118 $0 -100.0% $1,191 $1,095 -8.1% n/a n/a n/a $280 $459
63.9%
710 General Office 1,000 sf $153 $186 21.6% $94 $0 -100.0% $1,050 $480 -54.3% n/a n/a n/a $246 $201 -18.3%
140 Manufacturin 1000 sf $66 $93 69.1% $236 $D -100.0% $375 $240 -36.0% n/a n/a n/a $88 $101 14.8%
820 Retail 1,000 sf la $312 $441 41.3% $236 $D -100.0% $1531 $1138 -25.7% n/a n a n/a $503 $477 -6.2%
934 Fast Food Rest.w Drive-7hru 1 000 sf $863 $1,658 92.1% $330 $0 -100.0% $4 227 $4 273 1.1% n/a n/a $1,389 $1,792 29.0%
RESlDENT4IL:
210 Sin le Famil 2,000s du $245 $436 78.0% $1463 $1,947 33.1% $4,483 $4,248 -6.2% $1,756 $6,077 246.1% $229 $372 62.4%
$9388 $15,266 62.6%
220 Mul[i-Famil/Accersor Unit du $148 $249 68.2% $884 $1,111 25.7% $2,426 $2742 12.9% $500 $2,387 377.4% $717 $193 65.0%
$4,816 $7,923 64.5%
NON-RESIDENTIAL:
912 Bank/Savin sDrive-In 1000 sf $245 $625 155.1% n/a n/a $13020 $13,820 6.1% n/a n/a na $376 $417 9.3%
$15404 $16,835 9.3%
710 General Office 1,000 sf $216 $274 26.9% n/a n/a na $3,798 $4257 12.1% n/a n/a n/a $139 $135 -2.9%
$5,696 $5,533 -2.9%
140 Manufacturin 1000 sf $77 $137 77.9% n/a n a n/a $1318 $1,473 11.6% n a n/a n/a $64 $61 -6.6%
$2,203 $2095 -4.9%
820 Retail 1,000 sf la $441 $650 47.4% n a $3,163 $6360 101.1% n/a n a $155 $227 46.5% $6,341 $9,293 46.6%
934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drivr7hru 1,000 sf $1,217 $2439 100.4% n/a n/a n/a $34,781 $45,464 30.7% n/a n/a n/a $1,070 $1,391
30.0% $43,877 $57,017 29.9%
Source:Appendix I,Table I-1
Notes:
(1) "2009 Adopted Rate'column reflects all current adopted fee levels prior to April 22,2014. Of these,fees for correctional faclllties,solid waste and public buildings were suspended.
(2) "Calculated"column reflects the maximum calculated fees.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 ES-5 Impact Fee Update Study
G
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table ES-2
Summary of Impact Fees-All Program Areas(Affordable Growth Fee Rates);Unincorporated County
Correctional Facilities Solid Waste Facilities P,blicB,ildings Libraries Ell Emc,gcnVSc,0,cs
2009 2 Affordable Percent 2 0'9 Affordable Percent
ITE LUC Land Use Unit Affordable Percent 2009 Affordable Percent 2... Affordable P...em 009 d
Adopted Adopted Adopted Adopte Adopted
Growth Change Growth Change Growth Change Growth Change Growth Change
Rate Rate
Rate Rate Rate
RESIDENTUIL:
210 Sin Ie Famil 2,000sf du 1 $170 $0 -100.0% $75 $0 -100.07 $206 $739 258.7% $483 $672 39.1% $278 $35 -87.4%
220 Multi-Famil Accessor Unit du $100 $D -100.0% $57 $0 -100.0% $121 $418 245.5% $285 $387 33.7% $176 $20 -88.6%
NON-RESIDENTIAL:
912 Bank/Savings rive-in 1,000 sf $174 $0 -100.0% $118 $0 -100.0% $1,191 $569 -52.2% n/a n/a n/a $280 $0
-100.0%
710 General Office 1,000 sf $153 $0 -100.0% $94 $0 -100.0% $1,050 $250 -76.2% n a n a n a $246 $0 -100.0%
140 Manufacturing 1000 sf $55 $0 -100.0% $236 $0 -100.0% $375 $125 -66.7% n/a n/a n/a $88 $D -100.0%
820 Retail 1,000 sf la $312 $0 -100.0% $236 $0 -100.0% $1531 $592 -61.3% n/a $503 $0 -100.0%
934 Fast Food Rest.w Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $863 $0 -100.0% $3301 $0 -100.0% 54,227 $2 222 -47.4% n a n/a I n/a $1,389
$0 -100.0%
Law Enforcement Parks&Recreation Transportation Educational Facilities Administrative Fee(2.5%) Total(All Fees)
2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Percent 20 09 Full Percent
ITE LUC Land Use unit Aft rdable Percent Affordable Percent Affordable, Percent Affordable percent Full I-en,
Adopted Growth Change Adopted Growth Change Adopted Growth C lh..�. Adopted Growth Change Adopted Calculated Change Adopted Calculated
Change
Rate I F.te a1c, Fate Rare late
RESIDENINL:
210 Si-1 e Fa mil 2,000_ du $245 $436 78.0% $1463 $1,791 22.4% $4,463 $4,246 -5.2% $1,756 $1,702 -3.1% $229 $241 5.2%
$9,388 $9,864 5.1%
220
M
u
lt
i-F
a
mil/Accessor Unit du $148 $249 68.2% $884 $1,022 15.6% $2428 $2742 12.9% $500 $668 33.7% $117 $138 17.9% $4,816
$5638 17.1%
NON-RESIDENTIAL:
912 Bank Savin s Drive-In 1 1,000 sf $245 $625 155.1% n aHE
$13,020 $6,219 -52.2% n/a n/a n/a $376 $185 -50.8% $15,404 57,598 -50.7%
710 General Office 1,000 sf $216 $274 26.9% n/a $3798 $1916 -49.6% n a n a n a $139 $61 -56.1% $5696 $2,501
-56.1%
140 Manufacturin 1,000 sf $77 $137 77.9% n/a $1318 $663 -49.7% na n/a n/a $54 $23 -57.4% $2203 $948
-57.0820 Retail 1,000 sf la $441 $650 47.4% n a $3163 $2,862 -9.5% n/a n/a n/a $155 $103 -33.5% $6,341 54207
-33.7934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $1,217 $2,439 100.4% n/a $34,781 $20,459 -41.2% n/a n/a n/a $1,070 $628 -41.3%
$43,877 $25,748 -41.3%
Source:Appendix J,Table 1-1
Notes:
(1) "2009 Adopted Rate'column reflects all current adopted fee levels prior to April 22,2014. Of these,fees for correctional facilities,solid waste and public buildings were suspended.
(2) "Affordable Growth"column indicates the maximum discount that can be provided and still maintain the LOS.The discount Is first given to non-residential land uses,and then,to
residential land uses,if available.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 ES-6 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table ES-3(Preferred Alternative)
Summary of Impact Fees-All Program Areas(Staff Recommended Fee Rates);Unincorporated County
Correctional Facilities Ill Solid Waste Facilities Public Building, Lik-in, Emergency Services
ITE LUC Land Use Unit 2009 Percent 2009 Percent 2009 Percent 2009 Percent 20G9 Percent
Adopted Staff Change Adopted 5t�ff Adopted st uff Adopted Staff Adopted Staff
Rate Rate Change Rate Change Rate Change Rate Change
RESIDENTUIL:
210 Sln SIe Fa mil 2,000 sf I du 1 $170 $0 -100.0% $75 $0 -100.0% $206 $370 79.6% $483 $0 -10D.0% $278 $314
12.9%
220 Multi-Fa mil Accessor Unit du $100 $0 -100.0% $57 $0 -100.0% $121 $209 72.7% $285 $0 -100.0% $176 $1811 2.8%
NON-RESIDENTIAL
912 Bank/Savin sDrive-In 1,000 sf $174 $0 -100.0% $118 $0 -100.0% $1,191 $285 -76.1% n/a n/a n/a $280 $459
63.9%
710 General Office 1,000 sf $153 $0 -100.0% $94 $0 -100.0% $1,050 $125 -88.1% n/a n/a n/a $246
140 Manufacturin 1'000 sf $55 $0 -100.0% $236 $0 -1000% $375 $63 -83.2% n/a n/a n/a $88 $101 14.8%
820 Retail 1,000 sf la $312 $D -100.0% $236 $0 -100.0% $1531 $296 -80.7% n/a n/a $503
934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thru 1000 sf $863 $0 -100.0% $330 $0 -100.0% $4227 $1111 -73.7% n/a r/al nj. $1,389 $1,792
29.0%
Law Enforcement Park,R,Recreation Transportation Educational Facilities Adminktr�flv.Fee(25%) Total(All Fees)
ITE LUC Land U e Unit 2009 Percent 2009 Percent 2009 Percent 2009 Percent 2009 Full Percent 2009 Full Percent
Adopted Staff Change Adopted Staff Change Adopted Staff Change Adopted S"ff Change Adopted Calculated Change Adop ed Calculated
Change
RESIDENTI4L: Rate I late I Rate I Rate I Rate I Rate
210Sin Ie Famil 2000s du $245 $436 78.0% $1463 $1,343 -8.2% $4483 $4,248 -5.2% $1756 $1,702 -3.1% $229 $210 -8.3% $9386
$8623 -8.2%
220 Multi-Fa mi"'AccessoryUnit du $148 $249 68.2% $884 $767 -13.2% $2,428 $2742 12.9% $500 $668 33.7% $117 $120 2.6%
$4816 $4936 2.5%
NON-RESIDENTIAL
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 1000 sf $245 $625 155.1% n/a n/a $13020 $6,219 -52.2% n/a $376 $190 -49.5% $15404
$7778 -49.5%
710 General Office 1000 sf $216 $274 26.9% n/a n a n a $3798 $1916 -49.6% n/aE]Hn/a
$139 $63 -547% $5696 52,579 -54.7%140 Manufacturin 1,000 sf $77 $137 77.9% n/a n a $1318 $663 -49.7%
n a $54 $24 -55.6% $2 2035988 -55.2%
820 Retail1000 sf la $441 $65D 47.4% n/a n/a n a $3,163 $2862 -9.5% n/a $155 $1D7 -31.0% $6,341 $4392 -30.7934
Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 51,217 $2,439 3001% n/a n/a n/a 534,781 $20,459 -41.2% n/a 51,070 $645 -39.7% $43,877
$26,446 -39.7%
Source:Appendix K,Table K-1
Notes:
(1) "2009 Adopted Rate"column reflects all current adopted fee levels prior to April 22,2014. Of these,fees for correctional facilities,solid waste and public buildings were
suspended.
(2) "Staff"column indicates additional policy discounts proposed by Indian River County staff to the affordable growth scenarios.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 ES-7 Impact Fee Update Study
T/NDALE �` a
VL,YE andA
r
iNrR
i3
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 1
Ki
�ltHt[D4`,� • w e
win
Study Date 2005/09 2014 n/a
Single Family
Potential New: Less than 1,000 sf $7,519 $13,544 +80%
Revised: 1,000 to 1,499 sf $7,519 $14,276 +90%'
1,500 to 2,499 sf $9,388 $15,266 +63%
2,500 sf&more $10,195 $16,572 +63%
Multi-Family $4,816 $7,923 +65%
Mobile Home $4,455 $8,132 +83%
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 2
�"iquoA� � i * • '� M
Study Date2005/09 2014 n/a
Single Family
Less than 1,000 sf $7,519 $8,258 +9.8%
-1,000 to 1,499 sf $7,519 $8,929 +18.7%
1,500 to 2,499 sf $9,388 $9,864 +5.1%
2,500.sf&more $10,195 $11,066 +8.5%
Multi-Family $4,816 $5,638 +17.1%
Mobile Home $4,455 $4,857 +90%
NvU¢
moll
r 3 s
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 3
Study Date 2005/09 2014 n/a
Single Family
-Less than 1,000 sf $7,519 $7,175 -4.6%
-1,000 to 1,499 sf $7,519 $7,763 +3.2%
-1,500 to 2,499 sf $9,388 $8,623 -8.2%
-2,500 sf&more $10,195 $9,681 -5.0%
Multi-Family $4,816 $4,936 +2.5%
Mobile Home $4,455 $4,101 T.9%
s .� •
F�.accm?'
• - - 111
I�e
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 4
• a
Fine�in�s of Tec:��. c� � tui.
�h
5¢
3€ X r
e�
...,.._,..,..✓x ...".,.,,ef'ka Y<L....<..a.-...t.......,,,.....e_.e...»,.«.«w+.tk.NLhi.lwaa,vdeem..,...,.✓.wms....................1.aLNN3.�.JaJs.C.,.:evz......,,u,.....✓,✓.essa�e+���'
^a
Examples of Facilities Built Since 2005: F=
Liberty Magnet School(New)
Storm Grove Middle School(New)
Fellsmere Elementary Expansion �'
Vero Beach Elementary Expansion �
�e
Vero Beach Senior High School Expansion
e� Sebastian River Middle School Expansion
`' Sebastian River High School Expansion �''
ri
On-Going/Future Projects (CIP):
Treasure Coast Elementary Expansion �''
Citrus Elementary Expansion �,;
Indian •unty Impact Fee UpdateStudy
- .:. Irri�►aCt �'e� �/�e��1C�C�aJ�.C�Ct
c«�Basic Impact Fee Formula:
'et Impact Fee =
1 `
Asset Value Non-Impact Students per �,
� per Student Fee Revenue Residential �"
per Student Unit i.�
} im act �'ee
' Single Family Residential �''
Change Efffect on �
Pee
Credit: -Is°�o Fee:+246% �°
Demand: _lg%
r'
d
Indian •unty Impact Fee UpdateStudy
F+Ak Alk �ethodolo r
': o Consumption-Based Methodology
• Inventory �:
• Facility Service Delivery
• Cost Component P:
:k • Credit Component 5µr5
{ i+
• Student Generation Rates EEEE
Current Inventory a
• 13 Elementary Schools 4
` 19 Traditional
� • 4 Middle Schools Schools �»
f • 2 High Schools
fls
w
e".
y,
I
Indian •unty Impact Fee UpdateStudy
Alk
�»�Facility Service Delivery
School Type Totai/ � '
Description Weighted
Elementary Middle High Average
Permanent Net 1,122,710 602,578 826,729 2,552,017
Square Footagtoe
Permanent Student
7j761 4�288 $0235 17;284
Stations
Net Square Feet per 144.7 140.5 157.9 147.7
Student Station
rt
c�Facility Cost per Student Station: `
• All costs necessary to operate school
• Architect/civil design/site improvements �
• Land purchase
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
8
gti
?a�
'�ZORIOA-
Cost Component
Net Sq.Ft.per Student Station 144.7 140.5 157.9 147.7
School Facility Cost Components:
Architect/Civil Design/Site Improv.per $29.00 $35.00 $37.00 $33.01
Net Sq.ft.
Construction Cost per Net Sq.ft. $145.00 $175.00 $185.00 $165.04
FF&E Cost,per Net Sq.ft. $10.15 $12.25 $12.95 $11.55
Land Cost per Net Sq.ft. $11.60 .$13.3.0 $14.50 $1240
Total Facility Cost per Net Sq.Ft: $195.75 $235.55 $249.45 $222.00
Total Facility Cost per Student Station $28,325 $33,095 $39,388 $32,789
Nven'
i r i • w
F�AIiIT?p
• • • — • — •
1
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 9
C`
�`loRia?
Capital Improvement Credit $3,427
Debt Service Credit $6,977
Total Revenue Credit per Student $10,404
Facility Impact Cost(Weighted Avg.) $32,789
Transportation Impact Cost $709
Ancillary Facility Cost $1,020
Total Impact Cost per Student $34,518
Total Revenue Credit per Student $10,404
Net Impact Cost per Student $24,114
as
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 10
E ; u. t x :1��F'a. lli � b
6
Student Generation
@ Based on current student addresses
a,
f
matched with land use classification mJ
1 J'
j
" a
��v3=� m .. ..,e.<_.,u i., ..,..�d..�&.,dk:dp NdvPn.ra .,o,o,,,,v.w..,.d..........m............... .43^�� .,,^...s!?L.a.«w&.w�'.toP.w........«........e...�m.sl✓._air'll .k�
,qq
E.d !M C„� /AAAAAM ,.'!A7#Ni 7A1.1! 1
a ........ ...... ......... .... _...._. ................ ........ ...._. ....._...... _...............
o. Student Generation Rates
z
Total Number of Students `
Residential Land Use Housing Students per Unit
Units
z.
r
€P
a
E o Calculated School Impact Fee �.
• Net Impact Cost per Student multiplied by `
the student generation rate
Traditional
• Residential Land Uses ONLY fin"
• Single Family
• Multi-Family �'
• Mobile Home
k f,>
i
E ,
n>.
�? �� Calculated School Impact Fee Schedule
E
ryry
k
Residential Students Net Impact ��Impact 4��
Land IIse Unit per unit �QSt per t;oxt per Unit
Student �-
t.;
Schools
Singledu 0.252x
s
du 0.099
_ Mobile Home du 0.152 $24,114 a
�3
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 12
#
Aft ft
LWj
160%
140% .. ....,... _....... ....
120% _.._.m_ _._ _.._. _.:--------------- .._..--------.. -------
100%
o
80%
60% .. 28%- ---
40%
-40% - -- -Total Cost --
.._ ___. _ _. .._. --------_____.. __ ...... _ ...__
Maximum Impact Fee
20%
-----LOS Curve
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Annual Growth Rate
F4Mtl� .
Tota
Educational Facilities (Unin
Current Calculated Affordable Current AG School
Growth
IF
Single Family(2K sf) $1,756` $6,077 $1,702 $9,388 -$12,998 $8,623
Multi-Family $500 $2,387 $668 $4,816 $6,655 $4,936
Mobile Home $623 $3,665 $1,026 $4,455 $6,740 $4,101
Only the educational facilities impact fee is shown at calculated rate.
All other fees
ops
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 13
* s
• • • •MO 4 Mel
Affordable St.Lucie
Growth County
Study Date 2005 2014 2014 NIA 2008 2004
SingleFamily(2Kso $1,756 $6,077 $1,702 $6,091 $5,567 $4,445
Multi-Family(IK so $500 $2,387 $668 $3,115 $5,355 $2,794
Mobile Home(0.8K so $623 $3,665 $1,026 $1,758 $3,609 $2,667
ZL
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 14
�m ►�exriena�ion issues
Fee Calculations:
Measures impact over the life of structure
1
a Tiered fees
Need to charge for additional sf '
a
1 Updated calculations every 3 to 5 years r
6`
m leme�.ta��t�n issues
i i a
Building Permit
x:
Allows time to build the infrastructure '
Efficiency in coordinating with other jurisdictions
�1
k
--------
Indian River County •. •• . Study
f
• Y
m�a�ementation sues
i i ual ssess �;
Focus is the demand component ��.
Methodology should be consistent with technical
study �'
Differentiating characteristics need to be
e
sustainable over the life of the structure `E
Example: Retirement community with restriction �"
�� m leme'ntatit�n Issues ti
- t
to iy:
Refers to vacant property with impact fees paid&
E
using impact fee credits for a structure on another �
} parcel
r-
None of jurisdictions we work with allows for it
Difficult to plan for facilities �
Distorts equity between existing&new development �I
Impact fees run with the land ��
! i
a
Indian County Update •
16
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 17
�uvex .
`7AR10?`
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 18
Indian River County
Impact Fee Update Study
FINAL REPORT
�a
�C
� A
onto
Prepared for:
Indian River County
Community Development Dept.—Planning Division
180127 th Street, Building A
Vero Beach, FL 32960
ph (772)226-1237
June 6,2014
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
1000 Ashley Drive, Suite 400
Tampa, FL 33602
ph (813)224-8862,fax(813)226-2106
-31
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County
Impact Fee Update Study
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1
Methodology.............................................................................................................. 2
LegalStandard Overview........................................................................................... 3
ImplementationIssues............................................................................................... 6
II. CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES..................................................................................... 11
FacilityInventory........................................................................................................ 11
Service Area and Population...................................................................................... 14
Level-of-Service.......................................................................................................... 15
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 17
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 18
Net Correctional Facilities Impact Cost...................................................................... 21
Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule............................................ 21
Affordable Growth Strategy....................................................................................... 23
Staff Recommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 24
Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison.......................................... 24
III. SOLID WASTE FACILITIES........................................................................................ 26
FacilityInventory........................................................................................................ 27
Service Area and Population...................................................................................... 27
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 28
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 28
Net Solid Waste Impact Cost ..................................................................................... 30
Calculated Solid Waste Facilities Impact Fee Schedule............................................. 30
Affordable Growth Strategy....................................................................................... 32
StaffRecommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 32
Solid Waste Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison .......................................... 32
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 i Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
IV. PUBLIC BUILDINGS................................................................................................. 34
FacilityInventory........................................................................................................ 34
Service Area and Population...................................................................................... 37
Level-of-Service.......................................................................................................... 37
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 39
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 40
Net Public Buildings Impact Cost............................................................................... 42
Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule...................................................... 42
Affordable Growth Strategy....................................................................................... 44
StaffRecommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 46
Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison ................................................... 48
V. LIBRARIES............................................................................................................... 50
FacilityInventory........................................................................................................ 50
ServiceArea and Population...................................................................................... 53
Level-of-Service.......................................................................................................... 53
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 56
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 57
Net Library Facilities Impact Cost .............................................................................. 58
Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule..................................................... 59
Affordable Growth Strategy....................................................................................... 61
Staff Recommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 62
Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison .................................................. 62
VI. EMERGENCY SERVICES........................................................................................... 64
FacilityInventory........................................................................................................ 64
Service Area and Population...................................................................................... 67
Level-of-Service.......................................................................................................... 67
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 69
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 70
Net Emergency Services Impact Cost ........................................................................ 73
Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule............................................... 74
Affordable Growth Strategy....................................................................................... 76
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 ii Impact Fee Update Study
33
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
StaffRecommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 78
Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison ............................................ 78
VII. LAW ENFORCEMENT.............................................................................................. 80
Facility Inventor 80
ServiceArea and Population...................................................................................... 82
Level-of-Service.......................................................................................................... 82
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 84
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 85
Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost............................................................................ 85
Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule................................................... 85
Affordable Growth Strategy 87
Staff Recommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 87
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Comparison................................................ 87
VIII. PARKS& RECREATION FACILITIES........................................................................... 89
Inventory of Land and Recreation Facilities .............................................................. 89
ServiceArea and Population...................................................................................... 91
Level-of-Service.......................................................................................................... 91
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 94
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 97
Net Parks& Recreation Facilities Impact Cost........................................................... 100
Calculated Parks& Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule................................. 101
Affordable Growth Strategy....................................................................................... 101
Staff Recommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 103
Parks& Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison............................... 103
IX. TRANSPORTATION ................................................................................................. 105
DemandComponent.................................................................................................. 107
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 109
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 115
Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule....................................................... 118
Affordable Growth Strategy 122
StaffRecommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 125
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 iii Impact Fee Update Study
3V
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison .................................................... 125
X. EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES....................................................................................... 127
FacilityInventory........................................................................................................ 127
Service Area and Enrollment ..................................................................................... 128
Facility Service Delivery ............................................................................................. 129
CostComponent........................................................................................................ 130
CreditComponent...................................................................................................... 136
NetImpact Cost per Student..................................................................................... 139
StudentGeneration Rate........................................................................................... 140
Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule............................................. 141
Affordable Growth Strategy....................................................................................... 141
Staff Recommended Fee Rate ................................................................................... 143
Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison........................................... 143
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Population
Appendix B: Transportation Impact Fee-- Demand Component Calculations
Appendix C: Transportation Impact Fee--Cost Component Calculations
Appendix D: Transportation Impact Fee--Credit Component Calculations
Appendix E: Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
Appendix F: Building and Land Values Supplemental Information for Correctional, Law
Enforcement, Emergency Services, Government Buildings, Library, Parks
and Recreation Impact Fees
Appendix G: Educational Facilities Impact Fee--Supplemental Information
Appendix H: Administrative Fee
Appendix I: Master Fee Schedules (Full Calculated Fee Rates)
Appendix J: Master Fee Schedules (Affordable Growth Fee Rates)
Appendix K: Master Fee Schedules (Staff Recommended Fee Rates)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 iv Impact Fee Update Study
3S
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
I. Introduction
In response to high growth levels and the need to provide infrastructure to support this
growth, Indian River County (IRC) implemented a Transportation Impact Fee in 1986. In
2005, the County adopted impact fees in eight more program areas, including:
• Correctional Facilities
• Solid Waste Facilities
• Public Buildings
• Library Facilities
• Emergency Services
• Law Enforcement
• Educational Facilities
• Parks& Recreation Facilities
The technical studies for all program areas were updated in 2007; however, these technical
studies were not adopted. Of the nine program areas, only the transportation impact fee
was later updated substantially in 2009 by an internally generated County update using data
from the 2005 and 2007 studies, resulting in a fee reduction for almost all the land uses.
The eight non-transportation program fees were slightly modified in the 2009 update. Since
then, the County suspended the collection of five impact fee types to promote construction
during the economic downturn, and more recently extended suspension of correctional
facilities, solid waste, and public buildings impact fees.
Indian River County has retained Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) to prepare an
update study to reflect changes to the cost, credit, and demand components since the last
study. In addition, the study includes "affordable growth" calculations, which take into
account the existing development's ability to absorb new growth and calculates the level of
possible policy discounts without reducing the level of service. This report serves as the
technical study to support the calculation of updated impact fees. Given that the updated
fees under the Affordable Growth method indicated a decrease for almost all of the non-
residential fee categories, which is consistent with the County's economic development
goals, the BOCC adopted the updated fees for non-residential land uses on April 22, 2014.
At that time, calculations for residential land uses were not yet finalized due to
considerations for expanding the residential land use categories and to allow for some time
to obtain the input of the School Board for the educational facilities impact fee. This
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 1 Impact Fee Update Study
3C
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
technical report includes the final calculations for residential land uses in addition to non-
residential land uses.
It should be noted that figures calculated in this study represent the technically defensible
level of impact fees that the County could charge; however, the Board of County
Commissioners may choose to discount the fees as a policy decision. In fact, in addition to
using the affordable growth fees, the "Staff Recommended Fees" shown in Appendix K
include policy discounts proposed by the Indian River County staff for certain program
areas, primarily based on a consideration of future capital needs. More specifically, these
discounts include the following:
• Use of full calculated fees for emergency services program area
• Application of a 50-percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for public
buildings impact fees for all land uses
• Application of a 25-percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for parks and
recreation facilities impact fees for all land uses
• Suspension of the library impact fees
Methodology
The methodology used to update the County's impact fee program is a consumption-based
impact fee methodology, which is used throughout Florida. This methodology was also
used in preparing the 2004 and 2005 technical reports for Indian River County and is the
basis for the current adopted fees. A consumption-based impact fee charges new
development based upon the burden placed on services from each land use (demand). The
demand component is measured in terms of population per unit of land use in the case of
all impact fee program areas with the exception of educational facilities and transportation.
In the case educational facilities, student generation rate is used and in the case of
transportation, vehicle-miles of travel is used. A consumption-based impact fee charges
new growth the proportionate share of the cost of providing additional infrastructure
available for use by new growth. Cost estimates reflect the current value of capital assets
for each program area (i.e., the cost to buy or build the same asset today). In addition, per
legal requirements, a credit is subtracted from the total cost to account for contributions of
the new development toward any capacity expansion projects through other revenue
sources. Contributions used to calculate the credit component include estimates of future
non-impact fee revenues generated by the new development that will be used toward
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 2 Impact Fee Update Study
,37
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
capacity expansion projects. In other words, case law requires that the new development
should not be charged twice for the same service.
Finally, for all program areas with the exception of transportation, the level of service for
impact fee purposes is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets)
per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for each program
area of infrastructure. Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the study shows LOS in
terms of related capacity variables, such as acres per population for parks, stations per
population for fire/EMS, and building square footage per population for libraries and
government buildings, etc.
For example, consistent with current practice — and in order to ensure parks funded with
impact fees benefit those paying the fees — the parks LOS standard historically has been
measured by the value of all park land and the necessary park facilities per resident for
impact fee calculation purposes. It is quite common for the make-up of the asset inventory
to change over time. In the case of parks, specifically, the County will first buy land and
then build necessary park improvements to provide recreational services at parks funded
with impact fees.
This asset-based approach for non-transportation impact fees was also used in the 2005
technical study, which was the basis for the County's impact fees until this update.
Therefore, the County will continue to invest impact fees in park infrastructure (either land
or facilities), in order to maintain current levels of service.
Legal Standard Overview
In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established
through case law since the 1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the
"dual rational nexus" test, which requires that they:
• Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to
the need created by new development paying the fee; and
• Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development,
typically accomplished through a list of capacity-adding projects included in the
County's Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another
planning document/Master Plan.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 3 Impact Fee Update Study
3�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
In 2006, the Florida legislature passed the "Florida Impact Fee Act," which recognized
impact fees as "an outgrowth of home rule power of a local government to provide certain
services within its jurisdiction." § 163.31801(2), Fla. Stat. The statute — concerned with
mostly procedural and methodological limitations — did not expressly allow or disallow any
particular public facility type from being funded with impact fees. The Act did specify
procedural and methodological prerequisites, most of which were common to the practice
already.
More recent legislation further affected the impact fee framework in Florida, including the
following:
• HB 227 in 2009: The Florida legislation statutorily clarified that in any action
challenging an impact fee, the government has the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of the fee meets the
requirements of state legal precedent or the Impact Fee Act and that the court may
not use a deferential standard.
• SB 360 in 2009: Allowed fees to be decreased without the 90-day notice period
required to increase the fees and purported to change the standard of legal review
associated with impact fees. SB 360 also required the Florida Department of
Community Affairs (now the Department of Economic Opportunity) and Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) to conduct studies on "mobility fees," which
were completed in 2010.
• HB 7207 in 2011: Required a dollar-for-dollar credit, for purposes of concurrency
compliance, for impact fees paid and other concurrency mitigation required. The
payment must be reduced by the percentage share the project's traffic represents of
the added capacity of the selected improvement (up to a maximum of 20% or to an
amount specified by ordinance, whichever results in a higher credit). The courts
have not yet taken up the issue of whether a local government may still charge an
impact/mobility fee in lieu of proportionate share if the impact/mobility fee is higher
that the calculated proportionate share contribution.
• HB 319 in 2013: Applied mostly to concurrency management authorities, but also
encouraged local governments to adopt alternative mobility systems using a series
of tools identified in section 3180(5)(f), Florida Statutes, including:
1. Adoption of long-term strategies to facilitate development patterns that
support multimodal solutions, including urban design, and appropriate land
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 4 Impact Fee Update Study
3Q
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
use mixes, including intensity and density.
2. Adoption of an area-wide level of service not dependent on any single road
segment function.
3. Exempting or discounting impacts of locally desired development, such as
development in urban areas, redevelopment, job creation, and mixed use on
the transportation system.
4. Assigning secondary priority to vehicle mobility and primary priority to
ensuring a safe, comfortable, and attractive pedestrian environment, with
convenient interconnection to transit.
5. Establishing multimodal level of service standards that rely primarily on non-
vehicular modes of transportation where existing or planned community
design will provide adequate level of mobility.
6. Reducing impact fees or local access fees to promote development within
urban areas, multimodal transportation districts, and a balance of mixed-use
development in certain areas or districts, or for affordable or workforce
housing.
Also, under HB 319, a mobility fee funding system expressly must comply with the dual
rational nexus test applicable to traditional impact fees. Furthermore, any mobility fee
revenues collected must be used to implement the local government's plan, which served
as the basis for the fee. Finally, under HB 319, an alternative mobility system, that is not
mobility fee-based, must not impose upon new development any responsibility for funding
an existing transportation deficiency.
At this time, Indian River County is not interested in implementing a mobility fee primarily
due to the suburban nature of the county. Instead, the County is using the affordable
growth approach to reduce fees for non-residential land uses to accomplish its economic
development goals.
The following paragraphs provide further detail on the generally applicable legal standards
applicable here.
Impact Fee Definition
• An impact fee is a one-time capital charge levied against new development.
• An impact fee is designed to cover the portion of the capital costs of infrastructure
capacity consumed by new development.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 5 Impact Fee Update Study
J-40
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
• The principle purpose of an impact fee is to assist in funding the implementation of
projects identified in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and other capital
improvement programs for the respective facility/service categories.
Impact Fee vs.Tax
• An impact fee is generally regarded as a regulatory function established as a
condition for improving property and is not established for the primary purpose of
generating revenue, as are taxes.
• Impact fee expenditures must convey a proportional benefit to the fee payer.
• An impact fee must be tied to a proportional need for new infrastructure capacity
created by new development.
Authority to Impose Impact Fees in Indian River County
• IRC is a non-charter county.
o A non-charter county derives its authority from the state constitution and
statutory sources;
o A non-charter county may adopt ordinances that are not inconsistent with
general law; and
o A non-charter county may adopt countywide ordinances that do not conflict
with municipal ordinances.
• The fiscal burden of providing countywide services must be borne by property
owners in both the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the county.
Implementation Issues
This section addresses several considerations as part of the implementation of the impact
fee program.
Fee Calculations
• Calculated impact fees represent a land use's proportionate impact on infrastructure
over the life of that land use. For example, a home is likely to go through cycles
where at times it houses one or two people, such as a young couple without children
or a retired couple, etc. and at other times, a family with several children. The fees
are calculated based on the average impact (occupancy) of a home or another land
use over its lifetime.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 6 Impact Fee Update Study
'�1
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
• In the case of tiered fees, such as single family residential, office and retail, a
different fee for each tier is calculated to reflect the incremental increase in impact
on facilities among land uses. This tiered approach increases the fairness and equity
among land uses by differentiating the impact of different size buildings on a per
unit basis. Any given increase in impact should be charged additional impact fees in
order to reflect additional impact on facilities, if applicable, in order to maintain
level of service standards and to ensure that existing residents and businesses are
not unfairly bearing the burden of new growth.
Timing of Fee Payments
• Impact fees are typically collected at the building permit stage, which is also the
practice used by Indian River County. This allows the County to plan for and build
infrastructure needed to timely serve new growth and to effectively coordinate
impact fee collections between the County and the municipalities.
Fee Schedule Updates
• Impact fee calculations should be updated every three to five years to ensure the
fees are based on current data. This approach is useful in recognizing more
permanent changes and trends as opposed to varying the fee based on short-term
fluctuations.
Alternative Studies/Individual Assessments
• The County's impact fee ordinance currently outlines a process for alternative
studies (individual assessments) for determining traffic impact fees when a proposed
land use is not expressly included in the fee schedule. The primary considerations
for alternative studies (individual assessments) include the following:
o The focus of the alternative studies (individual assessments) is the demand
component of the land use, which is the subject of the alternative study.
Cost and credit components are calculated based on countywide facilities
and investment levels and are not the subject of an alternative study.
o The study should clearly identify the differences in the demand component
of the actual use and the closest land use category in the fee schedule in
order to verify the actual impacts of the proposed land use over the life of
the use. For example, if not included in the fee schedule, a retirement
community may have different demand characteristics than the average
single family subdivision. However, this community must be restricted (with
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 7 Impact Fee Update Study
y2
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
the County as a party to or having confirmed that restriction) for a different
fee to be calculated for a retirement community. Without such restriction,
the retirement community, in this example, could change to other residential
uses over time, creating a different impact on the community.
o Land uses included in the fee schedule table have impacts on public facilities
that have been widely documented for impact fee purposes. For example, in
the case of traffic impact fees, there is a large sample of trip characteristics
data on single family subdivisions located in Florida. Therefore, an
alternative study (individual assessment) for a specific single family
subdivision is not needed or appropriate to establish the level of impact
single family homes have on roads. Trip characteristics data already include
a range of travel characteristics and eliminate outliers prior to using an
average travel demand representative of the land use category. This
approach verifies that there is a "reasonable connection" or "nexus"
between the impacts of each listed land use and the calculated fees.
o For all program areas, the demand components (measured in terms of
persons per unit or students per unit for categories other than
transportation) should be studied when either the proposed land use is not
listed or the applicant demonstrates that the impacts of the proposed use
are significantly different than those captured in the study. The current data
that support the non-transportation impact fees are based on Census data
for Indian River County or student addresses matched with the land use type
from the Indian River County Property Appraiser database for residential
land uses. These data are representative of average local development and
are the most current data available. As mentioned previously, a study would
be appropriate only when the development type is completely different than
the land uses included in the fee schedule and this difference can be
maintained over the life of the development due to its nature or through
legal restrictions.
o Individual assessments should be generally consistent with the methodology
used in this study.
Portability
• Impact fees are attached to the project property and are calculated to mitigate the
land use's proportionate impact on County facilities. Once that land use is
permitted, the County will provide needed facilities as required by its own
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 8 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
ordinances. If a land use is later proposed that has a greater impact on County
facilities than did the previously approved land use, then, of course, impact fees for
the new land use would be limited to an amount that simply reflects the increased
impact.
However, the question frequently arises of whether impact fees should be returned
(in cash or as "portable" credits, for example) if the intensity of a land use is reduced
or terminated in the future. "Portability," some argue, would allow the credit
associated with tearing down a building to be used for another parcel. However,
none of the jurisdictions we work with allow for the portability of impact fees that
we are aware of, due to a number of reasons.
First, local governments plan for capital project funding and provide infrastructure
based on development in an area. As part of that process, impact fee revenues are
programmed and spent for the construction of necessary infrastructure in the same
district as the proposed use. Once the applicant has moved forward with its
development, so too does the County with the development's needed infrastructure
for that property in that area of the County. Once these fees are committed for use
to serve a proposed development, they cannot be "uncommitted," and, of course,
previously-built and contracted infrastructure improvements cannot be "ported" to
new locations or benefit districts.
Second, if the County "refunded" fees to properties that reduce or eliminate their
impacts, those "refunds" (having now been committed to meet the needs of the
initial land use) would necessarily redirect impact fees paid by others or general
fund sources, creating a misallocation of burden between existing development and
new growth.
Third, during the typical construction timeframe, running from building permit
issuance to certificate of occupancy, impact fees paid by a developer will not have
been committed and spent by the County. Therefore, if a proposed land use pays
impact fees (at building permit) but never comes to fruition (i.e., fails to receive a
certificate of occupancy) then impact fees paid by the applicant can be safely
returned without disrupting the County's CIP and budgeting process or unfairly
shifting costs to existing development or other fee payers. This policy, of course,
should be used only during this limited time and should be tied to the termination of
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 9 Impact Fee Update Study
yy
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
issued building permits to reflect the fact that the development (and therefore the
need for new infrastructure capacity) will not occur.
Finally, it should be noted that the payment of impact fees on a given parcel relieves
future owners or developers of that parcel from the need to pay fees for those
impacts in the future, which, presumably, is reflected in the value of the parcel, even
if there is a subsequent change of use. In this sense, the individual's investment in
impact fees can be "recouped," so to speak in the value added to the parcel.
This technical report has been prepared to support legal compliance with existing case law
and statutory requirements. Although the Florida courts have yet to expressly address the
methodology underpinning the Affordable Growth Strategy, this aspect of the report is
based on the long-standing legal standards described in this section. The technical report
also documents the methodology components for each of the impact fee areas in the
following sections, including an evaluation of the inventory, service area, level-of-service
(LOS), cost, credit, and demand components. Information supporting this analysis was
obtained from the County and other sources, as indicated.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 10 Impact Fee Update Study
4-5—
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
II. Correctional Facilities
Correctional facility impact fees are used to fund capital construction and expansion of
services related to land, facilities, and capital equipment required to support the additional
correctional facility demand created by new growth. This section presents the results of the
correctional facility impact fee update study for the County and will serve as the technical
support document for the updated correctional facilities impact fee schedule.
There are several major elements associated with the development of the correctional
facilities impact fee. These include:
• Facility Inventory
• Service Area and Population
• Level-of-Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net Correctional Facilities Impact Cost
• Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
• Affordable Growth Strategy
• Staff Recommended Fee Rate
• Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
These various elements are summarized in the remainder of this section, with the result
being the calculated correctional facilities impact fee schedule.
Facility Inventory
The correctional facilities inventory includes the County's jails and other related facilities
that are primarily for the provision of corrections and does not include any of the buildings
or portions thereof included in the calculation of other impact fees.
According to information provided by the County, Indian River County has a total of 258,000
square feet of correctional facility-related space. This includes the square footage of all four
phases of the Correctional Facility as well as other related buildings, such as the
guardhouses, warehouse visitation building, and maintenance shop. Table 1 presents a
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 11 Impact Fee Update Study
yG
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
summary of the correctional facilities land and building inventory, including a total land
value of $1.8 million and a total building value of $63 million. As previously mentioned,
these values do not include building space or land associated with other County
departments.
The building value per square foot is estimated based on research on recently built
correctional facilities, discussions and information from architectural and construction
companies, and the insurance values of the existing correctional facilities in Indian River
County. This value is estimated at $250 per square foot for correctional facilities and $125
per square foot for the other ancillary facilities included in the inventory. Appendix F
provides further detail on the building cost estimates.
The land value for correctional facilities is estimated at $50,000 per acre based on an
analysis of vacant land values and parcels sold in the County over the last three years as
well as the value of land where the current facilities are located (see Appendix F).
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 12 Impact Fee Update Study
47
Indian River County ( Impact Fee Update Study
Table II-1
Correctional Facilities Land and Building Inventory
Year Numberof Square Number Land Building Total
Facility Description Acquired/Built(l) Acres(i) Feet(i) of Beds(l) Value(2) Value(3) Building an(
Land Va
IRC Correctional Facility Phase I(s) 1987 149
9.81 $490,500
IRC Correctional Facility Phase Il(s) 1988 67,716 120 $16,929,000 $17,919,500
IRC Correctional Facility Phase III 1991 10.00 142 $500,000
IRC Correctional Facility Phase IV 2008 16.70 181,000 301 $835,000 $45,250,000 $46,085,000
Miscellaneous Buildings on Site(6)
Guardhouse n/a n/a 100 n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500
Guardhouse n/a n/a 100 n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500
Maintenance Shop 2008 n/a 100 n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500
Warehouse Visitation 2008 n/a 8,884 n/a n/a 1 $1,110,500 $1,110,500
Total 36.51 257,900 712 $1,825,500 $63,327,000 $65,152,500
Operational Capacity Beds(7) 612
Building Value per Square Foot(8) $246
Land Value perAcre(9) $50,000
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Number of acres multiplied by the land value per acre(Item 9)
(3) Square feet multiplied by$250 in the case of correctional facilities and$125 in the case of miscellaneous buildings
(4) Sum of land and building value
(5) Since the Correctional Facility and Detention Complex and the Sheriff's Administration Building are located at the same site, it was assumed that each
occupies 50 percent of the site
(6) These buildings are on the same parcels as the correctional facilities
(7) Operational capacity beds is lower due to requirements to keep inmates separate based on their custody levels and classifications
(8) Total building value(Item 3)divided by total square footage
(9) Estimated based on vacant land sales and values for parcels with similar acreage as well as the value of the current inventory
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
Z June 2014 13 Impact Fee Update Study
00
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
In addition to land and building costs, the correctional facility services also require the use
of necessary equipment and vehicles. As presented in Table II-2, the total vehicle and
equipment value is estimated at$2.8 million based on information provided by the County.
Table II-2
Correctional Facilities Equipment and Vehicle Inventory
Facility Description
Value
Vehicles 19 $31,437 $597,295
Vehicle/Radio Equipment 377 $1,172 $441,953
Weapons 212 $464 $98,375
Office Equipment 1 $31,784 $31,784
Specialty Vehicles/Equipment 3 $19,966 $59,899
Electronic Equipment 1 $1,077,078 $1,077,078
Computer Equipment 20 $4,099 $81,977
Miscellaneous Equipment 1 40 $9,806 392 240
Total Vehicle/Equipment Cost 1 $2,780,601
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Total value(Item 3)divided by units(Item 1)
(3) Source: Indian River County
Service Area and Population
The correctional facilities impact fee program requires the use of population data in
calculating current level of service. To be consistent with the population utilized in the
County's comprehensive planning process, this impact fee study considers not only the
resident or permanent population of the County, but also the number of seasonal residents
and visitors as well. Therefore, for purposes of this technical analysis, the weighted
seasonal population will be used in all population estimates and projections. Weighted
seasonal population projections used in the impact fee analysis reflect estimates provided
in the Indian River County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan for seasonal residents. In addition,
correctional facilities is one of the program areas where functional population is used to
capture the presence of all people within the community, whether residents, workers, or
visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of effective population need to be served. A more
detailed explanation of weighted and functional population estimates is provided in
Appendix A.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 14 Impact Fee Update Study
ya
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Level-of-Service
As presented in Table II-3, there is a relation between population growth and the need for
correctional facilities. Table II-3 presents the average daily jail population over the last ten
years, along with the corresponding population. The relation between the population and
jail population is used to establish a general trend in the need for correctional facility beds,
and to account for random fluctuations, the three-year average number of bookings and
population also is shown.
Table II-3
Service Area Population and Jail Bookings
Year Population(l) Average Daily Jail 3-YearAverage Change in 3-Year Average
BookingsPopulation(2) Population Bookings Population
2003 126,869 473 n/a n/a n/a n/a
2004 131,175 529 n/a n/a n/a n/a
2005 134,573 543 130,872 515 n/a n/a
2006 139,121 562 134,956 545 3.1% 5.8%
2007 143,177 544 138,957 550 3.0% 0.9%
2008 145,212 537 142,503 548 2.6% -0.4%
2009 145,356 513 144,582 531 1.5% -3.1%
2010 145,854 518 145,474 523 0.6% -1.5%
2011 146,325 490 145,845 507 0.3% -3.1%
2012 147,118 446 146,432 485 0.4% -4.3%
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-1
(2) Source: Indian River County
For planning purposes, the level-of-service (LOS) for correctional facility services is
expressed in terms of jail facility beds per 1,000 residents. Using this method, Indian River
County's current achieved LOS is 4.14 beds per 1,000 residents. The County's current
adopted LOS standard for correctional facilities is 4.5 beds per 1,000 residents. Given that
the achieved LOS is lower than the adopted standard, impact fee calculations for
correctional facilities are based on the achieved LOS. As mentioned previously, for impact
fee calculations, the LOS should be measured using functional population to capture
workers, visitors, and residents to calculate the correctional facilities impact fee. In terms
of functional population, the current LOS is 4.37 beds per 1,000 functional residents. Table
II-4 summarizes the calculation of the county's current LOS using both weighted seasonal
population and functional population.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 15 Impact Fee Update Study
50
Indian River County ( Impact Fee Update Study
Table II-4
Current Level-of-Service
Year2013
ComponentFunctional
Population Population
Population(l) 148,001 140,186
Number of Beds(2) 612 612
LOS(beds per 1,000 residents)(3) 4.14 4.37
Adopted LOS Standard (beds per 1,000 residents)(4) 4.50 4.75
(1) Appendix A,Table A-1 for weighted seasonal population and Table A-8 for functional population
(2) Source:Table II-1
(3) Number of beds(Item 2)divided by the population(Item 1),multiplied by 1,000
(4) Source: Indian River County; LOS standard for functional resident is calculated based on the ratio
of actual LOS in terms of weighted population versus functional population
Table II-3 summarizes a LOS comparison between Indian River County and counties with
correctional facility impact fees throughout the State of Florida. The LOS is displayed in
terms of permanent population for 2012 for all entities because functional population data
analysis has not been completed for these entities, as it was for Indian River County. In
addition, the number of beds for all jurisdictions presented in the following table is based
on gross beds. As presented, Indian River County's LOS is within the range of these
counties.
Although the LOS is measured in terms of beds per population for planning purposes, for
impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or
dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by
the County for each program area of infrastructure. This figure is shown later in this section
in terms of net impact cost per resident for correctional facilities, which should be included
in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes.
It is important to note that the construction of correctional facilities tend to be "lumpy" and
requires significant investments for large scales of construction. Indian River County
completed its most recent expansion in 2008, which was funded primarily with sales tax
revenues, and currently does not have any plans to build additional jails. In addition, the
average daily occupancy of approximately 450 inmates represents 75 percent of the
available functional capacity. As mentioned previously, correctional impact fees are not
being collected in Indian River County at this time, and there appears to be sufficient
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 16 Impact Fee Update Study
5f
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
capacity available to accommodate additional inmates due to growth in the near future.
This will be addressed further in the Affordable Growth section of the report.
Table II-5
Level-of-Service Comparison
2012 LOS(Beds per
•ss Permanent 1,000
Jurisdiction Beds(1) Population(2) Residents)(3)
Osceola County 873 280,866 3.11
Brevard County 1,709 545,625 3.13
St.Johns County 664 196,071 3.39
Collier County 1,304 329,849 3.95
Hernando County 818 173,104 4.73
St. Lucie County 1,370 280,355 4.89
Indian River County(Existing) 712 139,446 5.11
Highlands County 504 98,955 5.09
Citrus County 760 140,761 5.40
Okeechobee County 232 39,805 5.83
Charlotte County 960 163,357 5.88
(1) Source: Each jurisdiction's respective Sheriff's Office or Correctional Facilities
Department
(2) Source: University of Florida,Bureau of Economic and Business Research
(3) Gross beds(Item 1)divided by the 2012 permanent population(Item 2)divided
by 1,000 for each jurisdiction
Cost Component
Table II-4 provides the total asset value per resident. As shown, total asset value owned by
the County amounts to $67.9 million or $111,000 per bed. The total impact cost per
functional resident for correctional facilities in Indian River County is calculated by
multiplying the total cost per bed by the LOS (beds per 1,000 functional residents) and
dividing that figure by 1,000, which is approximately$485 per functional resident.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 17 Impact Fee Update Study
S'i
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table II-6
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Percent of
Description Figure Total Value(7)
Building Value(i) $63,327,000 93.229.
Land Valuel1i $1,825,500 2.69%
Equipment Valueizi $2,780,601 4.09%
Total Asset Value $67,933,101 100.00.0/0
Number of Beds(3) 612
Net Asset Value per Bed(4) $111,002
Current LOS(Beds per 1,000 Functional Residents)(5) 4.37
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(6) $485.08
(1) Source:Table II-1
(2) Source:Table II-2
(3) Source:Table II-4
(4) Total asset value divided by the number of beds(Item 3)
(5) Source:Table II-4
(6) Net asset value per bed(Item 4)multiplied by the current correctional facilities LOS(Item 5)
divided by 1,000
(7) Percent of building value,land value,and equipment value of the total asset value
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging new development for the correctional facility impact fee, a review of
the capital financing program for correctional services was completed. The purpose of this
review was to determine any potential revenue credits generated by new development that
are being used for expansion of capital facilities, land, and equipment included in the
inventory.
Capital Expansion Expenditures Credit
The capital expansion expenditures credit per functional resident was calculated based on
the capital expansion projects that were completed over the past five years and those
programmed for the next five years. The average annual capital expansion expenditures
were divided by the average functional residents for the same period in order to calculate
the average capital expansion cost per functional resident.
The County completed Phase IV expansion of the correctional facilities in 2008, which was
funded with sales tax revenues. Since then, there have not been any capacity expansion
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 18 Impact Fee Update Study
3'3
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
projects and there are none programmed for the next five years. This spending associated
with a portion of the Phase IV expansion results in an average capital expansion expenditure
of $2.3 million per year. Since the review of these expenditures spanned Fiscal Years 2008
through 2017, the average annual capital expansion cost is divided by the average
functional population for this same period. As shown in Table II-7, the result is an average
expansion cost of$16 per functional resident. It should be noted that although the optional
sales tax will expire in 2019, this analysis assumes that, if the sales tax is not re-adopted,
another revenue source will be used in the future.
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 19
S�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table II-7
Historical Capital Expansion Expenditures(l)
option al Sales Tax Revenues = $22,756,006
Housing Unit E Construction 22 756 006 = _ _ _ - $22,756,006
Total 422,756,006 $2,275,601
Average Annual Capital Expenditures(2) 140,301
Average Annual Functional Population"' $16.22
Expenditure per Functional Resident(')
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Average capital expenditures over the ten-year period
(3) Source:Appendix A,Table A-11
(4) Average annual capital expansion expenditures(Item 2)divided by average functional population(Item 3)
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. 20 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
V)
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Net Correctional Facilities Impact Cost
The net correctional impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost component
and the credit component. Table II-8 summarizes the calculation of the net correctional
facility cost per resident. The first section of Table II-8 identifies the total impact cost as
$485 per functional resident for correctional facilities. The second section of the table
identifies the revenue credits for the impact fee. The credit calculation includes a total of
approximately $299 per functional resident. The net impact cost per resident is the
different between the total impact cost and the total revenue credit per resident. This
results in a net impact cost of $186 per functional resident, which also represents the LOS
for impact fee purposes.
Table II-8
Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Revenue
Calculation Step Impact Cost Credits
Impact Cost
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(11 $485.081 -
Revenue Credit
Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Resident(2) $16.22
Capitalization Rate 2.5%
Capitalization Period (in years) 25
Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Residential $298.84
Net Impact Cost
Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident(4) $186.24 -
(1) Source:Table II-6
(2) Source:Table II-7
(3) Source:The present value of the capital improvement credit per functional resident(Item 2)at a
discount rate of 2.5%with a capitalization period of 25 years. The discount rate was provided by
Indian River County.
(4) Total impact cost per resident(Item 1)less the total revenue credit per resident(Item 3)
Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
Table II-9 presents the calculated correctional facilities impact fee schedule for residential
and non-residential land uses, based on the net impact fee cost per resident figures
presented in Table II-8.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 21 Impact Fee Update Study
5L
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table II-9
Calculated Correctional Facilities impact Fee Schedule
Functional Total Impact 2009 Percent
Impact Resident (2) Adopted Changet')
LUC Land Use Unit Coefficient(1) Fee Fee(3)
W
TIAL:amily(detached)an 1,000sf du 1.35 $251 $151 66.2%
to1,499sf du 1.45 $270 $151 78.8%
to2,499sfdu 1.54 $287 $170 68.8%
sforgreaterdu 1.72 $320 $194 73.9%
amily/Accessory Unit du 0.87 $162 $100 62.0°/Home/RV(Tied Down) du 0.98 $183 $123
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP: 0.65 $121 $99 22.2%
310 Hotel room
320 Motel room 0.60 $112 107 13.1%
252/620 Assisted Care Living Facility(ACCP)/Nursing Home
bed 0.92 $171 $107 59.8%
W760Research&D
&FINANCIAL:`
office/Clinic10,000sforless 1,000 sf 1.14 $212 $186 14.0%
1,000 sf 1.66 $309 $186 66.1%
l Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf
vings Walk-In 1,000 sf 2.23 $415 $212 95.8%
1,OOOsf 2.25 $425 $174 144.3%
avings Drive-In 1,000 sf 1.00 $186 $153 21.6%
l Office
h&Development Center 1,OOOsf 0.85 $158 881 95.1%
INDUSTRIAL: 0,50 $93 $55 69.1%
140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf
1,000 sf 0.28 $52 $42 23.8%
150 Warehousing
1,000 sf 0.06 $11 $8 37.5%
151 Mini-Warehouse 2 -38.1%
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse 1,000 sf 0.14 u6
1,OOOsf 0.69 $129 875 7
110 General Light Industrial .2%
n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55 $289 $165 755
n/a Sand Mining
acre 0.20 $37 $21 76.2%
RETAIL:
1,OOOgsf 2.37 $441 $312 41.3%
820 Retail
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or /o Car Wash fuel pos. 1.91 $356 $198 89.4%
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 1.47 $274 $186 47.3%
1,000 sf 6.78 $1,263 $800 57.9%
932 Restaurant
1,000 sf 8.90 $1,658 $863 92.1%
934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thru
1,000 sf 2.05 $382 $222 72.1/
950 Supermarket
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 5f 1.50 $279 $70 298.6%
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 $162 $206 -21.4%
1OOOsf 5.83 $1,086 $463 134.6%
853 Convenience Market w/Gas Pumps , $35 22.9%
890 Furniture Store 1,OOOsf 0.23 $43
RECREATIONAL: 1.08 $201 1- -24.7%
430 Golf Course hole
492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 3.09 $575 $259 122.6
412 County Park acre 0.20 $37 $17 117.6%
court 3.16 $589 $253 132.8%
491 Tennis Court 019 --5 1-1 105.9°/
420 Marina
berth
GOVERNMENTAL:
732 Post Office 1,OOOsf 1.62 $302 $194 55.7%
590 Library
1,OOOsf 1.76 $328 $188 74.5%
148 75.0°/
733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf 1.39 $259 S
MISCELLANEOUS:
565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 0.89 $166 $110 50.9%
610 Hospital 1,000 sf 1.37 $255 $171
1,000 sf 2.54 $473 $178 165.7%
640 VeterinaryClinic 5g 63.8%
1,000 sf 0.51 $95 $
560 Church
screen 5.98 $1,114 $925
444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee 20.4%
student 0.06 $11 $10
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) 10 30.0°/
522 Middle School(Private,6-8) student
530 High SchooI(Private,9-12) student 0.08 $15 $13 15.4%
540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 0.63 $$19 $11 17 $69 69.7%
n/a Fire Station
1,000 sf
Note:gsf=gross square feet
(1) Functional resident coefficients from Appendix A,Table A-12 for residential and lodging land uses and Table A-15 for non-residential Ian uses.
(2) Proposed impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost Per functional resident(Table II-8)by the functional resident coefficient(Item 1)
for each land use.
(3) Source:Indian River County;does not include administrative fee;fees are currently suspended
(4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates(Item 3)to the total impact fee(Item 2)
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. 22 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 67
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Affordable Growth Strategy
In the case of correctional facilities, based on a review of capital expansion expenditures
between Fiscal Years 2008 and 2017,the County uses approximately$2.3 million per year of
non-impact fee funding. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow
at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure II-1 presents how impact fee levels would
change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents
the maximum impact fee calculated in this report. This level is considered the investment
needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum
amount of correctional facilities impact fee calculated, if the historical levels of non-impact
fee funding were to be continued, the County would not need any impact fee revenue to
continue to maintain the current LOS.
It should be noted that the historical average non-impact fee contribution is based on
spending made for the last jail expansion, which was completed in 2008. Since then, the
County did not have any non-impact fee spending and does not have any capacity
expansion projects programmed in the CIP. This is reflective of "lumpy" nature of jail
construction in that correctional facilities tend to require large scale investments that
provide sufficient capacity for a longer term than most other infrastructure types. As
mentioned previously, the current jail population is approximately 75 percent of the jail
functional capacity.
Figure II-1
Correctional Facilities Impact Fee–Affordable Growth Approach
300% - ------- --
--------------------------------
-------------------------------------
----- -----
250% - ---•---------------
—Total Cost
------------- ----- Maximum impact Fee
200% - ------------ ---- -_,,-_. _ -
IRC Average ----LOS Curve
Annual Growth ---------- --------
--------------
_ 150% - ------------ --- - ----------------- -----------------------
�o
100%
---
0% Y
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Annual Growth Rate
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
Indian River County
June 2014 23 Impact Fee Update Study
SB
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Staff Recommended Fee Rate
For correctional facilities impact fee, the County staff recommends suspending the impact
fee based on the affordable growth calculations included in the previous section.
Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's correctional facilities impact fee
program, a comparison of correctional facilities impact fee schedules was completed for
other Florida counties. Table II-10 presents this comparison. As presented, Indian River
County's calculated fee is within the range of fees adopted by other Counties.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 24 Impact Fee Update Study
,5q
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table II-10
Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
Indian River County
2OD9 Brevard Okeechobee Collier Hernando Highlands
Land Use Unit (2) Affordable taff"I Adopted County County(7) County County County
Calculated Growth(3) S Rate
Date of Last Update 2013 2013 2013 12005 2000
2012 2009 2005 2006
Adoption Percentage 100°/ n/a n/a 100°/ 100°/ 1 100% 1 100°/ 1 loon/ 1000/0
Residential,
Single Family(2,000 sf) du $287 $0 $0 $170 $72 $533 $488 $7 $684
Non-Residential: f $129 $0 $0 $75 n/a $110 $176 $3 n/a
Light Industrial 1,OOOs
,OOOsf 5186 $0 $0 $153 $34 $258 $362 $5 n/a
office(50,000sgft) 1
Retail(100,DDOsgft) 1,000sf $441 $0 $0 $312 $160 $551 $670 $10 n/a
Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $425 $0 MI $174 $81 $551 $604 $10 n/a
Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf
0 $863 $428 $551 $2,297 $16 n/a
(1) du=dwelling unit
(2) Source:Table 11-9
(3) Calculated based on an annual growth rate of 1.4%and non-impact fee spending of$2.3 million per year
(4) Source:Indian River County Staff recommends the affordable growth fee rates
(5) Source:Indian River County;fees are currently suspended
(6) Source:Brevard County Planning&Development Department;Industrial land uses are exempt from impact fees
(7) Source:Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners Administrative Department
(8) Source:Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual Indexing
(9) Source:Hernando County Planning&Development Department
(10)Source:Highlands County Code of Ordinances,Section 13-28;Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30,2014
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. 25 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
6
O
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
III. Solid Waste Facilities
This section provides the results of the solid waste facilities impact fee analysis. There are
several major elements associated with the development of the solid waste facilities impact
fee:
• Facility Inventory
• Service Area and Population
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net Solid Waste Impact Cost
• Calculated Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule
Affordable Growth Strategy
• Staff Recommended Fee Rate
Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
These various elements are summarized in this section. It should be noted that solid waste
impact fees are not very common and there is limited literature. Solid waste operations are
typically an Enterprise Fund and tend to be self-sufficient in terms of funding. In the case of
Indian River County, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), a dependent district,
provides the solid waste services.
At this time, the solid waste impact fee is suspended in Indian River County. Prior to the
suspension, the County charged a solid waste impact fee to both residential and non-
residential land uses. These fees were calculated taking into account both the landfill and
garbage trucks used for waste collection. Since the last study, the County started
outsourcing the waste collection service. The landfill is used by both existing and new
growth on a continuous basis, and as such, it is difficult to establish a need directly tied to
new growth. In this study, the impact fee calculations are based on the customer
convenience centers, which are used only by residential land uses. Given this, the revised
fee schedule includes only residential land uses.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
Indian River County
June 2014 26 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Facility Inventory
As mentioned previously, the SWDD has the landfill site and also operates five customer
convenience centers throughout the District for the collection of Class I waste, yard trash,
cardboard, newsprint, and mixed recyclables. The landfill and operations of the customer
convenience centers are funded through an annual non-ad-valorem assessment and tipping
fees charged at the landfill. In addition, an outside contractor provides waste collection
services. As explained previously, the inventory related to the new growth consists of the
customer convenience centers,which are summarized in Table III-1.
The value of customer convenience center buildings and land are based on the most
recently built center and the value of existing properties. A more detailed explanation is
provided in Appendix F.
Table III-1
Summary of SWDD Capital Facilities Inventory
Total Facility—I
(1) Facility Land & .
Facility Description Acres Value(2) Value(3) Value(4)
Transfer Stations:
Winter Beach Customer Convenience Center 11.55 $2,600,,000000
$391,000 $2,991,000
Roseland Customer Convenience Center 1.38 $2,600,000 $27,600 $2,627,600
Gifford ustomer Convenience Center 11.81 $2600,000 $232,200 $2,832,200
Oslo Customer Convenience Center
4.75 2 600 000 95 000 2 695 000
Fellsmere Customer Convenience Center �- MO
Total 48.10 $13,000,000 9962,000 $13,962,000
$20,000 -
Land Value per Acre(5)
(1) Source:Indian River County
(2) Based on the cost of on-going expansion of the Oslo Customer Convenience Center
(3) Acres(Item 1)multiplied by the land value per acre(Item 6)
(4) Sum of the building(item 3)and land value(Item 4)
(5) Based on a review of values of land where existing facilities are located and vacant land sales and values
Service Area and Population
Solid waste facilities are provided on a countywide basis. Because customer convenience
centers serve only the residential customers, weighted population is used in this analysis.
The County's current weighted seasonal population estimate and future population
projections are provided in Appendix A,Table A-1 (countywide).
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 27
(o�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Cost Component
Table III-2 presents a summary of asset value related to the solid waste impact fee and
resulting value per resident ($94 per person). It should be noted that this amount also
reflects an average annual residential solid waste generation rate of 0.7 tons per capita per
year.
Table III-2
Net Impact Cost per Resident
ComponentPercentof
Capital Asset
Value
4TotalBuilding Value') $13,000,000 93°�
962 000 °
Value(z) 7 °t Value(3) $13,962,000 100%
lation(4) 148,001
Waste Asset Value per Residentis) $94.34
(1) Source:Table III-1
(2) Source:Table III-1
(3) Sum of the total building value(Item 1)and the total land value(Item 2)
(4) Source:Appendix A,Table A-1;Countywide
(5) Total asset value(Item 3)divided by population(Item 4)
(6) Each component divided by total asset value
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging new development for the solid waste facility impact fee, a review of
the capital financing program for customer care facilities was completed. The purpose of
this review was to determine any potential revenue credits generated by new development
that are being used for expansion of capital facilities and land included in the inventory.
As presented in Table III-3, the County uses an average annual amount of approximately
$252,000 of the SWDD's revenues toward the construction/expansion of customer
convenience center expansion. This amount results in an annual expenditure of
approximately$1.62 per resident,which is used the calculated the impact fee credit.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
Indian River County
June 2014 28 Impact Fee Update Study
�3
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table III-3
Historical and Planned Capital Expansion Expenditures IFY 2016- Total
2014 IFY 2015
Description(l) FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 IFY 2011 IFY 2012 FY 2013 FY
SWDD` -
- - - 6,493
Fellsmere Customer Convenience Center 0,000
_ -;;q
Roseland Customer Convenience Center111:2
50,000Oslo Customer Convenience Center $1,250,015 000Gifford Customer Convenience Center _ -
Total $1,250,00031,493
51,575
Average Annual Capital Expenditures�Z� 55,514
Average Annual Weighted Population(3) $1.62
Expenditure per Resident(4)
(1) Source:Indian River County,includes only the expenditures associated with capacity expansion(estimated at 50%of total amount for Roseland,Oslo and
Gifford Centers)
(2) Total expenditures divided by 20 years due to high investment levels during the 2008-2017 period,which are likely to repeat every 20 years based on
information provided by Indian River County.
(3) Source:Appendix A,Table A-1;Countywide
(4) Average annual capital expenditures(Item 2)divided by the average annual weighted population(Item 3)
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
n
29 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Net Solid Waste Impact Cost
The net impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost component and the
credit component. Table III-4 summarizes the calculation of the net solid waste impact cost
per resident, which is also the relevant LOS for impact fee purposes and should be included
in the Comprehensive Plan as such.
Table III-4
Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Calculation Step Impact Cost Revenue
Credits
Impact Cost
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(') $94.34
Revenue Credit
Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Resident(2) $1.62
Capitalization Rate 2.5%
Capitalization Period(in years) 25
Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Residential $29.85
Net Impact Cost
Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident(4) $64.49
(1) Source:Table III-2
(2) Source:Table III-3
(3) Source:The present value of the capital improvement credit per functional resident(Item 2)at a discount
rate of 2.5%with a capitalization period of 25 years
(4) Total impact cost per resident(Item 1)less the capital expansion credit per resident(Item 3)
Calculated Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule
The calculated solid waste impact fee for each residential land use is presented in Table III-
5. The net impact cost per resident calculated in the previous section is applied to the
average persons per unit by land use. The resulting total impact fees per dwelling unit
range from $79 for the multi-family residential land use to $163 for single family land use
with 2,500 square feet or more space.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 30 Impact Fee Update Study
GS
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table III-5
Calculated Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Net Cost Total
rr• Percent
Impact Residents per Impact Adopted
ITE LUC Land Use Unit per Unit(il Resident"' Fee") Fee"' Change'51
RESIDENTIAL:
Single Family(detached)
-Less than 1,000 sf du 1.97 $64.49 $127 $75 69.3%
210 -1,000ha 1,0 sf du 2.12 $64.49 $137 $75 82.7°/
- ,500 2,499 sf du 2.26 $64.49 $146 $75 94.7%
1to
1500 to 49eater du 2.52 $64.49 $163 $75 117.3%
,
du 1.28 $64.49 $83 $57 45.6%
220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit
240 Mobile Ho--"(Tied Down) du 1.44 $64.49 $93 $75 24.0%
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP: 21 -100.0%
310 Hotel room n/a n/a $0 $
room n/a n/a $0 $21 -100.0%
320 Motel bed n/a n/a $0 $33 -100.0%
260 Nursing Home 62 -100.0%
252 Assisted Care Living Facility(ACLF) bed $0 $
OFFICE&FINANCIAL: 118 -100.0%
Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,1000 sf n/a n/a $o $
720 118 -100.0%
Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $118 -100.0%
911 Bank/Savings Walk In
1000 sf n/a n/a $o $
1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $118 -100.0%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 94 -100.0%
710 General Office 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $
760 Research&Development Center
1,000 sf n/a n/a $o $94 -100.0%
INDUSTRIAL: 236 -100.0%
140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $
1,000000sf n/a n/a $0 $47 -100.0%
150 Warehousing 19 -100.0%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf n/a n/a $o $
1,000sf n/a n/a $0 $47 -100.0%
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse 236 -100.0%
110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $
acre n/a n/a
n/a Concrete Plant 213 -100.0%
n/a Sand Mining acre n/a n/a $0 $
RETAIL: -100.0%
820 Retail Center fuel pos. n/a n/a $0 $
236
39 -100.0%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with orw/o Car Wash fuel pos. n/a n/a $0 118 -100.0%
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $
1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $330 -100.0%
932 Restaurant 330 -100.0%
934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf n/a n/a $o $
1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $424
850 Supermarket 20 -100.0%
942 Automobile Rep air/Body Shop 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $
service bay n/a n/a $0 $77 -100.0%
947 Self-Service Car Wash 24 -100.0%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 S4
890 Furniture Store
1,000 sf n/a n/a $o $236 -100.0%
RECREATIONAL: 38 -100.0%
430 Golf Course hole n/a n/a $0 $
1,000sf n/a n/a $0 $118 -100.0%
92
4RaquetClub/Health Club/Dance Studio 85 -100.0%
412 County Park site n/a n/a $0 $
court n/a n/a $0 $18 -100.0%
491 Tennis Court 5 -100.0%
420 Marina berth n/a n/a $0 $4
GOVERNMENTAL: $o $94 -100.0%
732 Post Office 1,Ooo sf n/a n/a
1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $94 -100.0%
590 Library 94 -100.0%
733 Government Office Complex l,000sf n/a n/a $0 $
bed n/a
571 Jail -
MISCELLANEOUS:
$0
565 Day Care Center 1,000sf n/a n/a $236 -100.0%
l,000sf n/a n/a SD $83 -100.0%
610 Hospital 118 -100.0%
640 Veterinary Clinic 1.000 sf
1,000sf
560 Church 188 -100.0°/
444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen n/a n/a $0 $
n/a n/a $0 $12 -100.0%
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) student12 -100.0%
522 Middle School(Private,6-8) student n/a n/a $0 $
student n/a n/a $0 $13 -100.0%
530 High school(Private,9-12) 13 -100.0%
540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student n/a n/a $gq
n/a Fire Station 1.000 sf
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-2
(2) Source:Table III-4
(3) Residents per unit(Item 1)multiplied by the net cost per resident(Item 2)
(4) Source:Indian River County.Fees do not include administrative fee
(5) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates(Item 4)to the total impact fee(Item 3)
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 31
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Affordable Growth Strategy
As presented in Figure III-1, due to the availability of a large amount of non-impact fee
revenue and relatively low growth rate, the County does not need any impact fee revenues
to maintain the current LOS. If the County decides not to use the recurring revenues
toward future customer convenience centers, the calculated impact fee for a mid-size single
family home would be approximately $213 ($94.34 multiplied by 2.26 persons per housing
unit) and the full impact fee would be needed for this service.
Figure III-1
Solid Waste Impact Fee—Affordable Growth Approach
160% -------- - -- - -
---------------
--------------------------------
140%
--------- ----- ._-IRC Average-- --------
-
Annual_..._
120% --------- --_
-----------------------------------
1009/0
N
--------------------------------------------
. .
_ ---------
A
r
------------------------------------------------------
6096 --------- --------
------------------------
Total Cost -
-Maximum Impact Fee
20% --------- - ------------------------------ -- ---LOS Curve
00/0 - T -T-----------r .
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.000/6 8.00% 9.00% 10.0095
Annual Growth Rate
Staff Recommended Fee Rate
In the case of solid waste impact fees,the County staff recommends suspending the fee
schedule based on affordable growth calculations.
Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As mentioned previously, solid waste impact fees are relatively rare. Table III-6 presents the
comparison of Indian River County's existing and calculated fees to those jurisdictions that
do collect a solid waste impact fee.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 32 Impact Fee Update Study
(,7
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table III-6
Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
Indian River County
00• Brevard City of North City of Fort
Affordable
Calculated G rowth(3) Staff Rate(5)
Date of Last Update 2013 2013 2013 2005 2000 2011 2007
° 100%
Adoption Percentage
100% n/a n/a 100/
Residential:
Single Family(2,000 sf) du $146 $0 $0 $75 $160 $150 $136
Non-Residential: 0 $236 n/a $90 $159
Light Industrial 1,000 sf $0 $0 $
Office (50,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $94 n/a 10 $87
$104
Retail (100,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $236 n/a $185
Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $118 n/a $64 $114
Fast Food w/Drive-T1 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $330
n/a $780 $1,387
(1) du=dwelling unit
(2) Source:Table III-5
(3) Calculated based on average annual growth rate of 1.4%and non-impact fee spending of approximately$252,000 per year
(4) Source: Indian River County Staff recommends that affordable growth fee rates
(5) Source: Indian River County;fees are currently suspended
(6) Source:Brevard County Planning&Development Department
(7) Source:City of North Port Economic Development Department
(8) Source:City of Fort Pierce
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. 33 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
06
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
IV. Public Buildings
Public buildings impact fees are used to fund the land purchases and capital construction
and expansion of facilities and capital equipment required to support the additional
government service demand created by growth.
There are several major elements associated with the development of the administrative
facilities impact fee. These include:
• Facility Inventory
• Service Area and Population
Level-of-Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net Public Buildings Impact Cost
• Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule
Affordable Growth Strategy
• Staff Recommended Fee Rate
Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
Facility Inventory
The public facilities inventory includes facilities that are primarily for the provision of
essential county services and do not include any of the buildings included in the calculation
of other impact fees.
According to information provided by Indian River County, the County has approximately
565,000 square feet of general public facility space. This includes the square footage of
both primary and support buildings. Support facilities are defined as trailers, facilities
without air-conditioning, or facilities that are unlikely to be occupied by personnel.
Table IV-1 shows a summary of the public buildings inventory and the current value of
buildings and land. As presented, the inventory includes a total of 414,000 square feet of
primary bulding space and 151,000 square feet of support space.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
Indian River County
June 2014 34 Impact Fee Update Study
�q
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Building value of the facilities included in the inventory was estimated based on insurance
values, estimates for future buildings, and cost information obtained from other
jurisdictions. This analysis resulted in an estimate cost of$210 per square foot for primary
buildings and $50 per square foot for support buildings.
In addition to building value, land values were estimated for future land purchases. Land
value was determined primarily through a review of the value of parcels where the current
public buildings are located, as reported by the Indian River County Property Appraiser, and
an analysis of vacant land sales and values of 1- to 15-acre lots in Indian River County. This
analysis resulted in an average land value of $90,000 per acre. Additional information is
included in Appendix F.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 35 Impact Fee Update Study
70
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table IV-1
Summary of Public Buildings Facilities Inventory
(11
Year Building (1) Building Land Total
Facility Built(1) Square Feet(1) Acreage Value(2) Value(3) Value(4)
Primary Buildings
New County Admin. Building Complex 2007 177,092 5.71 $37,189,320 $513,900 $37,703,220
Health Department Building 1990 39,130 1.90 $8,217,300 $171,000 $8,388,300
Courthouse-Judicial Complexly 1994 116,007 2.17 $24,361,470 $195,300 $24,5561770
Administration Annex 1962 8,400 0.81 $1,764,000 $72,900 $1,836,900
Road&Bridge/Traffic Facilities Varies 18,350 11.16 $3,853,500 $1,004,400 $4,857,900
Transit Admin. Building 2012 8,171 2.86 $1,715,910 $257,400 $1,973,310
Supervisor of Elections Sub-Annex(43rd Ave) 2006 31,238 5.82 $6,559,980 $523,800 $7,083,780
Emergency Operations Center 2007 16,000 13.38 $3,360,000 $1,204,200 $4,564,200
Old Humane Society Building 1986 n a 4.77 n a429 300 429 300
Subtotal--Primary Buildings 414,388 48.581 $87,021,480 $4,372,200 1 $91,393,680
Support Buildings
Courthouse-Judicial Complex Parking Garage 1994 135,780 1.49 $6,789,000 $134,100 $6,923,100
Fleet Management Facility 2004 15,673 3.62 $783,650 $325,800 $1,109,450
Subtotal--Support Buildings 151,453 5.11 $7,572,650 $459,900 $8,032,550
Total--All Buildings 565,841 53.69 S94,594,1301 $4,832,1001 $99,426,230
Unit Cost(6) $167.17 $90,000
(1) Source:Indian River County
(2) Based on$210 per square foot for primary buildings and$50 per square foot for support facilities
(3) Based on$90,000 per acre
(4) Sum of building value(Item 2)and land value(Item 3)
(5) Excludes square footage associated with Law Library,which is included as part of the inventory used in the library impact fee
(6) Total building and land value divided by total building square footage and acreage,respectively. See Appendix F for further detail.
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
J
36 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Service Area and Population
Indian River County provides all residents, workers, and visitors the benefit of government
services. As such the service area was determined to be the entire county.
To be consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan, for purposes of this technical
analysis, the weighted seasonal population is used in all population estimates and
projections. As mentioned previously, weighted seasonal population projections used in
the impact fee analysis reflect estimates provided in the Indian River County's 2030
Comprehensive Plan for seasonal residents. In addition, public buildings is one of the
program areas where functional population is used to capture the presence of all people
within the community, whether residents, workers, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate
of effective population need to be served. A more detailed explanation of weighted and
functional population estimates is provided in Appendix A.
Level-of-Service
Based on the information provided by the County, Indian River County's 2013 achieved
level-of-service (LOS) is 2.80 square feet of primary facilities per weighted resident. Table
IV-2 presents the calculation of the existing LOS. In addition, the adopted LOS standard is
1.99 square feet per resident.
The County's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the addition of
approximately 10,000 square feet of public buildings space. With this additional
investment, the LOS is estimated at 2.78 square feet per resident by 2017. Given that both
the current and 2017 estimated LOS are higher than the adopted LOS standard, the impact
fee calculations were based on the adopted LOS standard, resulting in more conservative
impact fee levels. The adopted LOS standard is converted to square feet per functional
resident,which resulted in 2.10 square feet per resident, as shown in Table IV-2.
Although the LOS is measured in terms of building square feet per population for planning
purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of
investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity
investment made by the County for public buildings infrastructure. This figure is shown
later in this section in terms of net impact cost per resident for public buildings, which
should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 37 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table IV-2
Current Level-of-Service
Component Weighted Functional
Population Population
Population(l) 148,001 140,186
Public Buildings Square Footage (Primary Buildings)(2) 414,388 414,388
Achieved LOS(Sq.Ft. per Resident)(3) 2.80 2'96
Adopted LOS Standard(Sq. Ft. per Residents)(4) 1.99 2.10
Future LOS:
Population--2017M 152,612 144,582
Public Buildings Square Footage (Primary Buildings)i61 424,388 424,388
Achieved LOS(Sq. Ft. per Resident)(6) 2.78 2'94
(1) Source:Appendix A,Tables A-1 and A-11
(2) Source:Table IV-1
(3) Total square footage(Item 2)divided by the countywide population(Item 1)
(4) Source: Indian River County
(5) The CIP includes the addition of 10,000 square feet of public buildings space over the next five years
(6) Future public buildings square footage(Item 5)divided by the 2017 population
Table IV-3 presents a comparison of IRC's LOS standard with the LOS standards of other
counties. It is important to note that the public building square footage for different
jurisdictions is not readily available in a format to provide an "apples-to-apples"
comparison. As such, information obtained from a recent study on the LOS analysis for
government buildings was used as the basis for the comparison included in Table IV-3.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 38 Impact Fee Update Study
?3
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table IV-3
Level-of-Service Comparison
FootageTotal Square Primary Permanent Sq.Ft.per
County Footage(l) Square(1) Population(2) Resident(3)
11
Seminole 770,029 710,096 428,104 1.66
Hernando 319,946 313,305 173,104 1.81
Palm Beach 3,431,780 2,588,451 1,335,415 1.94
Pasco 1,027,749 922,219 468,562 1.97
Manatee 829,913 763,290 330,302 2.31
Polk 1,692,402 1,416,373 606,888 2.33
Brevard 1,418,931 1,370,073 545,625 2.51
Collier 1,436,493 891,384 329,849 2.70
Osceola 969,392 807,020 280,866 2.87
Escambia 1,263,692 872,880 299,511 2.91
Indian River 565,841 414,388 139,446 2.97
Marion 1,357,640 1,045,175 332,989 3.14
Charlotte 664,786 641,9941 163,357 3.93
St.Johns 773,347 771,047 196,071 3.93
(1) Source:Table IV-1 for IRC; "Collier County Government Buildings&Law
Enforcement Facilities Level-of-Service Analysis,2010"for other jurisdictions
(2) Source:BEBR,2012 final population estimates
(3) Primary square footage divided by permanent population(Item 2)
Cost Component
The cost component of the study evaluates the cost of capital items, including buildings and
land. Table IV-4 provides a summary of all capital costs, which amounts to $240 per square
foot of public buildings, and $504 per functional resident.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 39 Impact Fee Update Study
7'i
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table IV-4
Public Building Total Cost per Functional Resident
ComponentPe rce nt of
Cost
Total BuildingValue(l) $94,594,130 95.14%
Total Land Value(2) $4,832,100 4.86%
Total Building and Land Value(3) $99,426,230 100.00%
Primary Building Square Footage(4) 414,388
Total Building and Land Value per Square Foot(5) $239.94
Adopted LOS Standard- Bldg Sq Ft per Functional Resident(6) 2.10
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(7) $503.87
1 1
(1) Source:Table IV-1
(2) Source:Table IV-1
(3) Sum of building value(Item 1)and land value(Item 2)
(4) Source:Table IV-1
(5) Total building and land value(Item 3)divided by primary building square footage(Item 4)
(6) Source:Table IV-2
(7) Building and land value per square foot(Item 5)multiplied by building square footage per functional
resident(Item 6)
(8) Percentage distribution of building value and land value in relation to the combined building and land
value
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging development for the public buildings impact fee, a review of the
capital financing program for public buildings was conducted. The purpose of this review
was to determine any potential revenue credits that should be considered for revenues
generated by new development that could be used for capital facilities and land expansion
for public buildings. To estimate an average annual non-impact fee expenditure, capital
projects funded during the past five years and programmed for the next five years were
reviewed. Based on this analysis, a credit for these expenditures is provided in Table IV-5,
which results in an average annual credit of $5 per functional resident. It should be noted
that a large part of this funding is obtained from the optional sales tax, which will expire in
2019. The credit calculations assume that the sales tax will not be re-adopted. If the sales
tax is re-adopted, the credit calculations should be evaluated to determine if a revision is
necessary.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 40 Impact Fee Update Study
75
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table IV-S
Capital Expansion Project Funding per Functional Residentlll
Optional Sales Tax: $359,680 $1 $478,188
18,508 - - -
Expansion of Fiber Optic Network $2,000,000
$2,x.0
Displaced Courtroom(Additional Offices) - _ _ 4 459 226
Emergency Operations Center 4 152 640 $306,586 = _ = - - _
$359,680 $2,118,508 $6,937,414
Subtotal--Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues $4,152,640 $306,586 $693,741
Subtotal--Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues1�1 $494
Average Annual Expenditures per Resident(Sales Tax)1a1
Court Facfli Surcha e: . 250 000 _ $250,000
NewCourtroomFacilities - - $250,000
$250,000
Subtotal Expenditures Funded with Court Facility Surcharge Revenues $0 $0
-- $25,000
Subtotal--Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Court Facility Surcharge Revenues(4) $018
Average Annual Expenditures per Resident(Court Facility Surcharge)")
Optional Sales Tax and Court Facility Surcharge: $7,187,414
Total-Public Buildings $4,152,640 $306,586 $359,680 $2,368,508
$718,741
Total Public Buildings Expansion Expenditures perYear161 140,301
Average Annual Functional Populationl71 $5.12
Annual Public Buildings Expansion Expenditures per Resident1e1
(1) source:Indian River County
(2) Public buildings expenditures funded by the optional sales tax divided by 10 years
(3) Subtotal-average annual expenditures funded with sales tax revenues(Item 2)divided by the average annual functional population(Item 7)
(4) Public buildings expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues divided by 10 years
(5) Subtotal-average annual expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues(Item 4)divided by the average annual functional population(Item 7)
(6) Sum of the subtotal expenditures funded with sales tax revenues and the subtotal expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues
(7) Source:Appendix A,Table A-11
(8) Total public buildings expansion expenditures per year(Item 6)divided by average annual functional population(Item 7)
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. 41 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
c
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Net Public Buildings Impact Cost
The net impact fee per functional resident is the difference between the Cost Component
and the Credit Component. Table IV-6 presents the calculation of the net public buildings
facilities impact cost per functional resident.
The first section of Table IV-6 identifies the total impact cost as $504 per functional
resident. The second section of the table identifies the capital expandion expenditure
credits for the public buildings facilities impact fee.
The net impact cost per functional resident (third section of the table) is the difference
between the total impact cost per functional resident of $504 and the total revenue credit
of $24 per functional resident. The result is a net impact cost of $480 per functional
resident,which also represents the relevant LOS measure for impact fee purposes.
Table IV-6
Net Public Building Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Revenue Credits
Impact Court
Calculation Step Cost SalesTax Facility Total
Surcharge
Impact Cost
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident�'� $503.87
Revenue Credit
Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit Amount per Functional Resident(Z) $4.94 $0.18
Capitalization Rate 2.5% 2.5%
Capitalization Period(in years) 5 5
Capital Expansion Credit per Resident�3� $22.95 $0.84 $23.79
Net Impact Cost
Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident
�4�
(1) Source: Table IV-4
(2) Source: Table IV-5
(3) Average annual capital improvement credit per functional resident(Item 2)over a capitalization rate of
2.5%for 5 years for sales tax and the court facility surcharge. The estimated discount rate is provided by
Indian River County.
(4) Total cost per resident(Item 1)less the total credit per resident(Item 3)
Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule
Based on the analysis conducted in this section, a public buildings impact fee schedule was
developed for residential and nonresidential land uses and is illustrated in Table IV-7.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 42 Impact Fee Update Study
77
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table IV-7
Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule
rr• Percent
Impact Functional Total Impact
ITE LUC Land Use Unit Resident Fee(2) Adopted �4)
Coefficient Fee") Change
RESIDENTIAL:
Single Family(detached)
-Less than 1,000 sf du 1.35 $648 $183 254.1%
210 1,000 to 1,499sf du 1.45 $696 $183 280.3%
-1,500 to 2,499sf du 1.54 $739 $206 258.7%
-2,500 sf or greater du 1.72 $826 $223 270.4%
220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.87 $418 $121 245.5%
240 Mobile Home/RV(Tied Down) du 0.98 $470 $149 215.4%
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP.
310 1 Hotel room 0.65 $312 $2291 36.2%
320 IMotel room 0.60 $288 $2291 25.8%
252/260 jAssisted Care Living Facility(ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 $442 $312 41.7°/
OFFICE&FINANCIAL:
720
Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sfor less 1,000sf 1.14 $547 $1,275 -57.1%
Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 1.66 $797 $1,275 -37.5%
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,000sf 2.23 $1,071 $1,454 -26.3%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 1,000sf 2.28 $1,095 $1,191 -8.1%
710 GeneraIOffice 1,000sf 1.00 $480 $1,050 -54.3%
760 Research&Development Center 1,000sf 0.85 $408 $555 -26.5%
INDUSTRIAL:
fl14OManufacturing 1,000sf 0.50 $240 $375 -36.0°/Warehousing 1,000sf 0.28 $134 $288 -53.5%Mini-Warehouse 1,000sf 0.06 $29 $40
27.5%
High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse 1,000sf 0.14 $67 $288 76.7%
General Light Industrial 1,000sf 0.69 $512 35.4%
Concrete Plant acre 34.2%
Sand Mining acre 0.20 $96 $145 -33.8%
RETAIL:
820 Retail S,000sfgla 2.37 $1,138 $1,531 25.7%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 1.91 $917 $921 -0.4%
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 1.47 $706 $912 -22.6%
932 Restaurant 1,000sf 6.78 $3,255 $3,923 -17.0%
934 Fast Food Restw/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 8.90 $4,273 $4,227 1.1%
850 Supermarket 1,000sf 2.05 $984 $1,087 -9.5%
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 1.50 $720 $134 437.3%
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 $418 $1,009 -58.6%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 5.83 $2,799 $2,270 23.3%
890 Furniture Store 1,000 s 0.23 $110 $170 -35.3%
RECREATIONAL:
430 Golf Course hole 1.08 $518 $1,307 60.4%
492 RaquetClub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 3.09 $1,483 $1,270 16.8%
412 County Park acre 0.20 $96 $81 18.5%
491 Tennis Court court 3.16 $1,517 $1,241 22.2%
420 Marina berth 0.19 $91 $82 11.0°/
GOVERNMENTAL:
732 jPost Office loosf 1 1.62 $7781 $1,107 -29.7%
590 1 Library 1,000sf 1.76 $845 $919 -8.1%
571 IJail bed 1.391 $667 $466 43.1%
MISCELLANEOUS:
565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 0.89 $427 $755 -43.4%
610 Hospital 1,000sf 1.37 $658 $838 -21.5%
640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 2.54 $1,219 $1,223 0.3%
560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 $245 $285
444 Movie Theater w/Mati nee screen 5.98 $2,871 $4,535 -36.7%
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) student 0.06 $29 $70 -58.6%
522 Middle School(Private,6-8) student 0.07 $34 $70 -51.4%
530 High School(Private,9-12) student 0.08 $38 $90 -57.8%
540/550 University/Junior Col lege with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 $48 $78 -38.59'.
n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 0.63 $302 $339 -10.9%
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-12 for residential and lodging land uses and Table A-15 for non-residential land uses
(2) Calculated impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost per functional resident(Table IV-6)by the functional resident coefficient(Item 1)
for each land use
(3) Source:Indian River County;fees do not include the administrative fee;fees are currently suspended
(4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates(Item 3)to the total impact fee(Item 2)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 43 Impact Fee Update Study
Z$
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Affordable Growth Strategy
Based on the data shown in Table IV-5, the County will use $694,000 per year of sales tax
revenues for the next five years. In addition, the County uses approximately $25,000 per
year of recurring non-impact fee funding for capacity projects. During the next 25 years,
Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure IV-
1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As
shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum technically acceptable fee. This
level is compared to investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County
may charge the maximum amount of public buildings impact fee calculated, if the historical
levels of non-impact fee funding were to be continued, the County could adopt the impact
fee at approximately 90 percent for all land uses and continue to maintain the adopted LOS
standard used in the calculations. If the County decides to charge the residential land uses
the full calculated fee (at 100 percent), the fee adoption rate for non-residential land could
be reduced to 52 percent and still maintain the adopted LOS standard. As mentioned
previously, these calculations assume that the sales tax will not be re-adopted in 2019. If
the sales tax is re-adopted in 2019 or another revenue source becomes available for public
buildings capital projects, these calculations need to be revised. Finally, the level of
discount is a policy decision and could be at any level between the minimum levels
calculated in this section and 100 percent and still maintain the adopted LOS standard.
Figure IV-1
Public Buildings Impact Fee—Affordable Growth Approach
-------------------------------------
----------------
100%
80% ------- ---- ---- ---
---------•-------------
� 90% Total Cost
60% --------
LOS
- — ------------------------------------------------- Maximum impact Fee -.
LOS Curve
Annual Gro
40% IRC Avera a-- ---------------------------
wth
-----------------------
0% ' '
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Annual Growth Rate
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 44 Impact Fee Update Study
ZQ
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table IV-8
Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule-Affordable Growth
Affordable rr•
Impact Growth Total Impact Adopted Percent
ITE LUC Land Use Unit Adoption Fee(2) Fee(3) Change(4)
RESIDENTIAL:
Single Family(detached)
-Less than 1,000 sf du 100% $698 $183 254.1%
210 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 100°/ $696 $183 280.3%
1,500 to 2,499 sf du 1001% $739 $206 258.7%
2,500 sf or greater du 100% $826 $223 270.4%
220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 100°/ $418 $121 245.5%
240 IMobile Home/RV(Tied Down) I du 1 100% $470 $149 215.4%
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP:
310 lHotel room 52% $162 $229 29.3%
320 IMotel room 52% $150 $229 34.5%
252/260 lAssisted Care Living Facility(ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 52% $230 $312 -26.3%
OFFICE&FINANCIAL:
720 Medical office/Clinic 10,000sf or less 1,000sf 52% $284 $1,275 -77.7%
Medical Office/Clinic greater than10,000sf 1,000 sf 52% $414 $1,275 -67.5%
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,OOOsf 52% $557 $1,454 -61.7%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 1,000 sf 52% $569 $1,191 -52.2%
710 General Office 1,000sf 52% $250 $1,050 -76.2%
760 Research&Development Center 1,000 sf 52% $212 $555 -61.8%
INDUSTRIAL:
140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf 52% $125 $375 -66.7%
150 Warehousing 1,000 sf 52% $70 $288 -75.7%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 52% $15 $40 -62.5%
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse 1,000 sf 52% $35 $288 -87.8%
110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 52% $172 $512 -66.4%
n/a Concrete Plant acre 52% 1 $387 $1,130 -65.8%
n/a ISand Mining acre 52% $50 $145 -65.5%
RETAIL:
820 Retail 1,000sfg1a 520 $592 $1,531 -61.3%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 52% $477 $921 -48.2%
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 52% $367 $912 -59.8%
932 Restaurant 17000 sf 52% $1,693 $3,923 -56.8%
934 Fast Food Restw/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 52% $2,222 $4,227 -47.40%
850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 52% $512 $1,087 -52.9%
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf 5206 $374 $134 179.1%
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay 52% $217 $1,009 -78.5%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 52% $1,4551 $2,270 35.9%
890 Furniture Store 1,OOOst 52% $57 $170 -66.5%
RECREATIONAL:
430 Golf Course hole 52% $269 $1,307 -79.40%
492 RaquetClub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 52% $771 $1,270 -39.3%
412 County Park acre 52% $50 $81 -38.3%
491 Tennis Court court 52% $789 $1,241 -36.4%
420 Marina berth 52% $47 $82 -42.7%
GOVERNMENTAL:
732 1 Post Office 1,OOOsf 52% $4%j $1,107 -63.4%
590 Library 1,000 sf 52% $439 $919 -52.2%
571 IJail bed 52% $347 $466 -25.5%
MISCELLANEOUS:
565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 52% $222 $755 -70.6%
610 Hospital 1,000 sf 52% $342 $838 -59.2%
640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 52% $634 $1,223 -48.2%
560 Church 1,000 sf 52% $127 $285 -55.4%
444 Movie Theater w/Mati ne e screen 52% $1,493 $4,535 -67.1%
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) student 52% $15 $70 -78.6%
522 Middle School(Private,6-8) student 52% $18 $70 -74.30,
530 High School(Private,9-12) student 52% $20 $90 -77.8%
540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 52% $25 $78 -67.9%
n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 52% $157 $339 -53.71
(1) Based on annual growth rate of 1.4%and non-impact fee spending of$719,000 per year for the next five years and$25,000 per year afterwards
(2) Source:Calculated 100%impact fee from Table IV-7 multiplied by affordable growth adoption rate(Item 1)
(3) Source:Indian River County;fees do not include the administrative fee;fees are currently suspended
(4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates(Item 3)to the total impact fee(Item 2)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 45 Impact Fee Update Study 190
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Staff Recommendation Fee Rate
Based on a review of upcoming capital needs, the County staff recommends adopting the
affordable growth fee schedule with a 50 percent discount. This is a policy discount based
on a review capital needs over the next several year and will be reviewed over the next
three to four years, when an impact fee update study is prepared.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 46 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County)Impact Fee update Study
Table IV-9
Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule-Staff Recommended Fee Rates
rr• Percent
Impact Staff Total impact
ITE LUC Land Use Unit Recommended Fee(2) Adopted
AdjustmentM Fee") Change
RESIDENTIAL•
Single Family(detached)
-Less than 1,000 sf du 50% $324 $183 77.0%
210 1,000 to 1,499sf du 50% $348 $183 90.2%
1,500 to 2,499sf du 50% $370 $206 79.6%
2,500 sf or greater du 50% $413 $223 85.2%
220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 50% $209 $121 72.7%
240 Mobile Home/RV(Tied Down) du 50% $235 $149 57.7%
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP(Ado ):
310 Hotel room 50% $81 $229 -64.6%
320 IMotel room 50% $75 $229 -67.2%
252/260 lAssisted Care Living Facility(ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 50% $115 $312 -63.1%
OFFICE&FINANCIAL( ):
720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000sf or less 1,000sf 509/ $142 $1,275 -88.9%
Medi cal Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 509/ $207 $1,275 -83.8%
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,000sf 50% $279 $1,454 -80.8%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 1,000sf 501% $285 $1,191 -76.1%
710 General Office 1,000sf 50% $125 $1,050 -88.1%
760 Research&Development Center Floosf 50% $106 $555 -80.9%
INDUSTRIAL(A ):
140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 509/ $63 $375 -83.2%
150 Warehousing 1,000 5f 509/ $35 $288 -87.8%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000sf 50% $8 $40 -80.09/
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse* 1,000sf 50% $18 $288 -93.8%
110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 50% $86 $512 -83.2%
n/a Concrete Plant acre 50% $194 $1,130 -82.89%
n/a ISand Mining acre 50% $25 $145 -82.8%
RETAIL
820 Retail 1,000sfgla 50% $2% $1,531 -80.7%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 50% $239 $921 -74.0%
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 509% $184 $912 -79.8%
932 Restaurant 1,000sf 509/ $847 $3,923 -78.4%
934 Fast Food Restw/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 50% $1,111 $4,227 -73.7%
850 Supermarket 1,000sf 509/ $256 $1,087 -76.4%
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 509/ $187 $134 39.61
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay 50% $109 $1,009 -89.2%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 50% $728 $2,270 -67.9%
890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 509/ $29 $170 -82.9%
RECREATIONAL( ):
430 Golf Course hole 509/ $135 $1,307 -89.7%
492 RaquetClub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 509/ $386 $1,270 -69.60/
412 County Park acre 50% $25 $81 -69.1%
491 Tennis Court court 50% $395 $1,241 -68.2%
420 Marina berth 509/ $24 $82 -70.7%
GOVERNMENTAL( ):
732 IPost Office 1,OOOsf 50% $203 $1,107 -81.7%
590 Library 1,OOOsf 50% $220 $919 76.1%
571 1.1ail bed 50% $174 $466 62.7%
MISCELLANEOUS(Adopted):
565 Day Care Center 1,OOOsf 50% $111 $755 -85.3%
610 Hospital 1,OOOsf 509/ $171 $838 -79.6%
640 Veterinary Clinic 1.O sf 509/ $317 $1,223 -74.1%
560 Church 1,OOOsf 509/ $64 $285 77.5%
444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 50% $747 $4,535 -83.5%
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) student 50% $8 $70 -88.60/
522 Middle School(Private,6-8) student 50% $9 $70 -87.1%
530 High School(Private,9-12) student 50% $10 $90 88.9%
540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 50% $131 $78 83.3%
n/a Fire Station 1,0O0sf 50°/ $79 $339 76.7%
*All Non-Residential fees have been adopted,except the High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse land use
(1) Source:Indian River County
(2) Source:Calculated affordable growth fee from TableIV-8 multiplied by the staff recommended adjustment(Item 1)
(3) Source:Indian River County;fees do not include administrative fee. Fees are currently suspended.
(4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates(Item 3)to the total impact fee(Item 2)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 47 Impact Fee Update Study
82
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's public buildings impact fee
schedule, the County's calculated impact fee schedule was compared to the adopted fee
schedule and those in similar or nearby jurisdictions. Table IV-10 presents this comparison.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 48 Impact Fee Update Study
93
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table IV-10
Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
Indian River County
00• St.Lucie Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Martin St.Johns
Land Use UnitM Calculated 12� Affordable Staff(4) Adopted County County(7) County(8) County"' County(10) County p 1) County(12)
Date of last Update 2013 2013 2013 2005 1 2009 20 1 2010 2010 2005 2012 2011
Adoption Percentage 100% n/a n/a 100°/ 100'/ 100% 50% 100% 100°/ 100°/
Resfdential
Single Family(2,OOOsf) du $739 $739 $370 $206 $336 $404 $264 $766 $466 $646 $565
Non-Residential
Light Industrial 1,000sf $331 $172 $86 $512 $68 $140 $60 $271 $168 $182 $210
Office(50,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf $480 $250 $125 $1,050 $297 $254 $151 $558 $335 $316 $600
Retai1(100,000sgft) 1,D00sf $1,138 $592 $296 $1,531 $504 $391 $305 $966 $651 $551 $1,158
Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,OOOsf $1,095 $569 $285 $1,191 $504 $551 $305 $895 $651 $554 $456
Fast Foodw/Drive-Thru 1,DOOsf $4,273 $2,222 $1,111 $4,227 $504 $1,575 $305 $3,539 $1,012 $2,482 $1,015
(1) du=dwelling unit
(2) Source:Table IV-7
(3) Source:Table IV-8
(4) Source:Table IV-9;Indian River County Staff recommends charging 50 percent of the affordable growth fee rates
(5) Source:Indian River County;fees are currently suspended
(6) Source:St.Lucie County Planning&Development Services Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing
(7) Source:Charlotte County Planning&Land Development Department. In Charlotte,bank w/drive-thru is charged"per lane". Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual
indexing. Fees are currently
suspended
(8) Source:Citrus County Planning&Development Department
(9) Source:Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing
(10)Source:Hernando County Planning&Development Department
(11)Source:Martin County Growth Management Department
(12)Source:St.Johns County Planning&Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc.
49 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
OG
L
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
V. Libraries
Library impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of library
services related buildings, land, and materials/equipment required to support the additional
library facilities demand created by new growth. This section provides the results of the
library impact fee analysis. There are several major elements associated with the
development of the library facilities impact fee:
• Facility Inventory
• Service Area and Population
• Level-of-Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net Library Facilities Impact Cost
• Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
• Affordable Growth Strategy
• Staff Recommended Fee Rate
• Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
These various elements are summarized in this section. It should be noted that library
impact fees are charged to residential land uses only.
Facility Inventory
The IRC Library Service operates five libraries with a total square footage of 110,000. The
following table presents the inventory of library facilities. The building value is estimated at
$240 per square foot based on recent library construction and insurance values of existing
libraries. Land value for library buildings is estimated at $50,000 per acre based on value of
current parcels and an analysis of recent vacant land sales and values. Appendix F provides
additional information on building and land value estimates.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 50 Impact Fee Update Study
8S
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table V-1
Library Land & Building Inventory Total Building
Year (2) Square Land Building and Land
Facility Description Address
Main Library 160021st Street,Vero Beach,FL32960 1991 4.180 49,286 $209,000 $11,828,640 $12,037,640
North County Library 1001 CR 512,Sebastian, FL 32958 1993 4.115 25,445 $205,750 $6,106,800 $6,312,550
Law Library 200016th Avenue,Vero Beach,FL 32960 1994 n/a 3,993 n/a $958,320 $958,320
Gifford Youth Activities Center Library 4875 43rd Avenue,Vero Beach,FL 32967 n/a n/a 1,513 n/a $363,120 $363,120
Brackett Library 16155 College Lane,Vero Beach,FL32966 2009 n/a 30,000 n/a $7,200,000 $7,200,000
Total 8.295 110,2371 $414,750 $26,456,8801 $26,871,630
Land Value per Acre(7) $50,000
Building Value per Square FootlB� $240
(1) Source:Indian River County
(2) Source: Indian River County; Land associated with Law,Gifford Youth Activities Center and Brackett Libraries are not included because they are either not
owned by the County or are accounted for in another impact fee program area
(3) Source: Indian River County
(4) Acres(Item 2)multiplied by the land value per acre(Item 7)
(5) Square footage(Item 3)multiplied by building value per square foot(Item 8)
(6) Sum of land value(Item 4)and building value(Item 5)
(7) Based on a review of vacant land sales and values. See Appendix F for additional detail.
(8) Based on recent construction,insurance values,and other available materials. See Appendix F for additional detail.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 51 Impact Fee Update Study
ao
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
The five facilities identified in Table V-1 house a wide variety of materials available to the
public. Table V-2 presents the inventory of library materials.
Table V-2
Library Material Inventory
• • • •
Books:
Gifford Youth Activities Center Library 9,724 $25 $243,100
Law Library 225 $80 $18,000
Main, North, Brackett Libraries:
-All Books 443,181 $53 $23,488,593
- Electronic Resources 28,812 $100 $2,881,200
-Electronic Books 1,525 $100 $152,500
-Serials 14,027 $75 $1,052,025
-Books on Tape/CD 15,023 $75 $1,126,725
Total-Books 512,5171 1 $28,962,143
Online Resources:
Online Resource Subscriptions 68 $4,0941 $278,392
Other Library Items:
Music CDs 16,200 $15 $243,000
DVDs 24,798 $20 $495,960
Videos 4,386 $15 $65,790
Print Subscriptions 1,775 $39 $69,225
Other Print Materials 24,775 $50 $1,238,750
Total-Other Library Items 71,934 $2,112,725
Total-All Library Materials 584,519 $31,353,260
Total Value per Item(3) $54
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Number of units multiplied by the cost
(3) Total value for all library materials divided by the total units for all library materials
In addition to the available material, the IRC Library System owns a variety of equipment,
both for public use and for its own operations. Table V-3 presents the inventory of
equipment for public versus operational use. It should be noted that impact fee standards
are based on the equipment for public use, excluding the equipment used by the library
staff.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 52 Impact Fee Update Study
87
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table V-3
Library Equipment Inventory
Numberof Items(i) Unit Total
Equipment (1) Equipment
Public Staff Total Cost Value(2)
Copiers 6 4 10 $7,000 $70,000
Book Scribe Copier 1 0 1 $16,500 $16,500
Laser Printers 10 6 16 $2,136 $34,176
Computers 121 74 195 $900 $175,500
Large Print Readers 1 01 1 $5,000 $5,000
30"TV 1 0 1 $800 $800
45"TVs 1 0 1 $2,000 $2,000
52"TVs 1 0 1 $2,356 $2,356
42"TVs 1 0 1 $1,527 $1,527
46"TVs 1 01 1 $2,205 $2,205
32"TVs 3 0 3 $2,428 $7,284
Dollar Changer 1 0 1 $2,955 $2,955
Laminator 1 1 $1,265 $1,265
Camcorder 1 0 1 $800 $800
LCD Projectors 51 Q1 5 $2,50012 500
Total-Al I Items 154 851 239 $334,868
Total-All(excluding computers) 1 331 ill 44 $159,368
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Number of items multiplied by the unit cost
Service Area and Population
Library services are provided on a countywide basis and the impact fee is charged only to
residential land uses. As such, consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan,
countywide weighted seasonal population is used in the calculation. The County's current
population estimates and future population projections are provided in Appendix A, Table
A-1.
Level-of-Service
The following table provides a summary of the current LOS as well as the adopted LOS
standard for library buildings, books, other library materials, and computers in Indian River
County.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 53 Impact Fee Update Study
88
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Although the LOS is measured in terms of buildings, materials and equipment per
population for planning purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is
shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which
reflects the capacity investment made by the County for library infrastructure. This figure is
shown later in this section in terms of net impact cost per resident for libraries, which
should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes.
Table V-4
Level-of-Service (2013)
• LOS
Item Footage/ Population(2) 1,000 Standard(per
111
•
Residents
Library Buildings(sf) 110,237 148,001 745 580
Library Materials(items) 584,519 148,001 3,949 3,200
Computers(5) 121 148,001 0.8 0.7
Other Library Equipment(items)Is) 331 148,0011 0.2 1 0.2
(1) Source: Table V-1 for buildings,Table V-2 for materials,and Table V-3 for computers and equipment
(2) Source:Appendix A,Table A-1
(3) Square footage/count(Item 1)divided by population(Item 2)multiplied by 1,000
(4) Source:Indian River County
(5) Source:Table V-3;only computers and equipment available for public use are included
As presented in the table, the County's current LOS is above the adopted LOS standard for
all elements, except for other library equipment. For impact fee calculations, the adopted
LOS standard is used in order to ensure new development is not overcharged. In addition, a
review of the CIP indicated that there are no capital expansion projects programmed for the
next five years. As such, the existing LOS is likely to decrease somewhat, which suggests
that it is preferable to use the adopted LOS standard to provide a more conservative
approach.
A comparison of the current Indian River County LOS, the adopted LOS standard, LOS of the
other Florida counties, and the suggested State standards is presented in Table V-5. The
comparison includes counties with a population of 100,000 to 750,000, and is based on the
information obtained from the Library Directory with Statistics, published by the
Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services. It should be noted that
the current LOS figures included in the table for Indian River County represent figures
provided by the Division of Library and Information Services and reflect FY 2013 data with
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 54 Impact Fee Update Study
Sq
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
the use of permanent population. To be able to provide an "apples-to-apples" comparison,
2013 data is used for Indian River County and its peer group.
Table V-5
Comparison of IRC Current LOS to Florida Standards
IRCAchieved FIL Public Library Standards
Standard .
Item • 1,000 1000
Residents)(') (1) Essential Enhanced Exemplary
Library Buildings(sq.ft.) 745 580 600 700 1,000
Library Materials(3) 3,949 3,200 2,000 3,000 4,000
Computers 0.8 0.70 0.30 0.50 1.00
(1) Source:Table V-4
(2) Source:Standards for Florida Public Libraries,2004; Updated April 2013
(3) Library materials include books,online resources,subscriptions,and other library items
IRC's adopted LOS standard for buildings does not meet the Florida Library Association's
(FLA) essential standards. However, the County's adopted standard for library materials
and computers and achieved LOS for all other areas are between the enhanced and
exemplary LOS standards established by the State.
The following table provides a comparison of the current IRC LOS to those of surrounding
counties. IRC's LOS is higher than surrounding counties in all areas, except for computers.
In terms of computers, IRC ranks second after Brevard County.
Table V-6
Comparison of IRC Current LOS to Surrounding Counties(per 1,000 residents)
OkeechobeeItem Indian River Per 1,000 Residents
. .
(Existing)(3) Brevard Osceola
Group(4)
IFI-Counties(5)
Library Buildings(sq.ft.) 745 7001 337 388 3171 422 500
Library Materials(l) 3,949 2,662 1,0111 2,2561 1,1461 1,8981 2,074
Computers(2) 0.81 1.01 0.5 0.4 0.4
(1) Library materials for IRC include books,CDs, DVDs,videos,print,and online resource subscriptions.
Library materials for other counties include books,serial subscriptions,and Audio/video volumes
(2) Source: Department of State—Division of Library&Information Services,2009/10 Library Directory with
Statistics; Includes public computers only
(3) Source:Table V-4
(4) Peer group includes jurisdictions with 100,000 to 750,000 service area population(excluding IRC)
(5) Includes all jurisdictions in Florida(excluding IRC)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 55 Impact Fee Update Study
Qb
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Cost Component
Costs are calculated separately for facilities and items/equipment. Facility costs are based
on the estimated cost to add the next library building, and the cost of library items and
equipment is based on the estimated current value per unit.
Buildings and Land
Table V-7 summarizes the calculation of library facility and land values. The total impact
cost or total value per resident for library buildings and land in Indian River County is$141.
Table V-7
Building and Land Cost per Resident
Element Figure
Total BuildingValuelll $26,456,880
Total Land Value(2) 414 750
Total Building and Land Value(3) $26,871,630
Building Square Footage(4) 110,237
Total Building and Land Cost per Square Foot(5) $243.76
Adopted LOS Standard(sf per 1,000 residents)(6) 580
Total Building and Land Cost per Resident(7) $141.38
Ti—) Source:Table V-1
(2) Source:Table V-1
(3) Sum of building value(Item 1)and land value(item 2)
(4) Source:Table V-1
(5) Building and land value(Item 3)divided by building square footage(Item 4)
(6) Source:Table V-4
(7) Total building and land value per square foot(Item 5)multiplied by the
adopted LOSS(Item 6)divided by 1,000
Library Materials and Equipment
The following table provides a summary of library materials and equipment costs per
resident, which amounts to$175.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 56 Impact Fee Update Study
91
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table V-8
Library Materials and Equipment Cost per Resident
Element Figure
Library Materials Value per Item(l) $54
Adopted LOS Standard for Materials per Resident(2) 3.20
Library Materials Value per Resident(3) $172.80
Computers- Unit Value(4) $1,450
Adopted LOS Standard for Computers per Residential 0.0007
Computer Value per Resident(6) $1.02
Other Library Equipment Value per Item(7) $4,829
Adopted LOS Standard for Other Library Equipment per Resident(8) 0.0002
Other Library Equipment Value per Resident(9) $0.97
Total Materials and Equipment Cost per Resident(10) $174.79
(1) Source:Table V-2
(2) Source:Table V-4
(3) Library materials value per item(Item 1)multiplied by the adopted LOS standard for
materials per resident(Item 2)
(4) Source:Table V-3;Total value divided by the number of items available for public use
(5) Source:Table V-4
(6) Unit value of computers(Item 4)multiplied by the adopted LOS standard for
computers per resident(Item 5)
(7) Source:Table V-3;Total value divided by the number of items available for public use
(8) Source:Table V-4
(9) Other library equipment cost(Item 7)multiplied by the adopted LOS standard for other
library equipment per resident(Item 8)
(10)Sum of library materials,computer,and other library equipment costs per resident
(Items 3,6,and 9)
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging new development, a review of funding for library capital expansion
projects over the past five years and those programmed for the next five years was
completed. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential revenues generated
by new development, other than impact fees, that are being used or will be used to fund
the expansion of capital facilities, land, and materials for the County's libraries program.
This review suggests that historically the County used primarily State grants to fund a
portion of capacity expansion over the past five years and has no capacity projects included
in the CIP.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 57 Impact Fee Update Study
az
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Capital Improvement Credit
Table V-9 summarizes the library related capital expansion projects that are funded by state
grants. The table includes recent expenditures for the years 2008 through 2017. The
average annual capital expansion expenditure during this five-year period is $0.34 per
resident. This figure is calculated by dividing the average annual total capital expenditure
amount for the ten-year period by the County's average population during the same time
period.
Table V-9
Historical Library Capital Expansion Funding Sources
State Library
Fiscal Year (1)
Grant
Construction of Brackett Library:
FY 2008 $0
FY 2009 $300,000
FY 2010 $200,000
FY 2011- FY 2017
Total $500,000
Average Annual Capacity Expansion Expenditures(2) $50,000
Average Annual Population(3) $148,070
Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(4) $0.34
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Average expenditure per year
(3) Source:Appendix A,Table A-1
(4) Average annual capacity expansion expenditures(Item 2)divided by the
average annual population(Item 3)
Net Library Facilities Impact Cost
The net impact fee per residence is the difference between the cost component and the
credit component. Table V-10 summarizes the calculation of the net library impact cost per
resident,which reflects the relevant LOS for impact fee calculation purposes.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 58 Impact Fee Update Study
93
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table V-10
Net Library Facilities Impact Cost
Calculation Step Impact Revenuel
Cost Credits
Impact Cost
Building and Land Cost per Resident hl $141.38
Library Materials Cost per Resident(2) $172.80
Library Equipment Cost per Resident(3) 1.99
Total Impact Cost(4) $316.17
Revenue Credit
Average Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(5) $0.34
Capitalization Rate 2.5%
Capitalization Period (in years) 25
Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(6) 1 1 $6.26
Net Impact Cost
Net Impact Cost per Resident(') $309.91
(1) Source:Table V-7
(2) Source:Table V-8
(3) Source:Table V-8
(4) The sum of building,land,materials,and equipment costs(Items 1,2,and 3)
(5) Source:Table V-9
(6) Source:The present value of the capital improvement credit per functional resident
(Item 2)at a discount rate of 2.5%with a capitalization period of 25 years. The discount
rate was provided by Indian River County.
(7) Total impact cost per resident(Item 4)less total credit per resident(Item 5)
Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
The calculated library impact fee for each residential land use is presented in Table V-11.
The net impact cost per resident calculated in the previous section is applied to the average
persons per unit by land use. The resulting total impact fees per dwelling unit range from
$381 for the multi-family residential land use to $781 for single family land use with 2,500
square feet or more space.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 59 Impact Fee Update Study
g�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table V-11
Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
Residents .st per Impact 2009 Percent
Residential Land Use per Unit(1) Resident(2) Fee(3) Adopted Fee(4) Change(5)
Residential
Single Family(less than 1,000 sf) 1.97 $309.91 $611 $430 42.1%
Single Family(1,O00to 1,499sf) 2.12 $309.91 $657 $430 52.8%
Single Family(1,500to 2,499 sf) 2.26 $309.91 $700 $483 44.9%
Single Family(2,500 sf or greater) 2.52 $309.91 $781 $524 49.0%
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit 1.28 $309.91 $397 $285 39.3%
Mobile Home/RV Park(tied down) 1.44 $309.91 $"61 27.8%
11
(1) Source: Appendix A,Table A-2
(2) Source:Table V-10
(3) Residents per unit(Item 1)multiplied by net cost per resident(Item 2)
(4) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown do not include the administrative fee.
(5) Percent change from the current adopted rates(Item 4)to the total impact fee(Item 3)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 60 Impact Fee Update Study
U)
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Affordable Growth Strategy
Based on the data shown in Table V-9, the County uses approximately $50,000 per year of
non-impact fee funding for library capacity projects. During the next 25 years, Indian River
County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure V-1 presents
how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the
red horizontal line represents the maximum impact fee calculated above. This level is
considered the investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Given that the available
non-impact fee funding for library capital facilities is very limited, the County needs most of
the impact fee (approximately 95 percent) to maintain the adopted LOS standards used to
calculate the impact fee. In addition, library impact fees are charged only to residential land
uses and the County's primary focus at this time is to provide some impact fee relief to non-
residential land uses.
Figure V-1
Library Impact Fee–Affordable Growth Approach
100%
80% -----
95% Total Cost
�°� _ _-._ Maximum Impact Fee
7
� 609'0 �_ --.-__---______________
—LOS Curve
~ . ---- –
IRC Average
Annual Growth
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Annual Growth Rate
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 61 Impact Fee Update Study
94
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table V-12
Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule—Affordable Growth
Affordable
Growth Total 2009 Percent
Residential Land Use Adoption Impact Adopted (4)
Residential
Single Family(less than 1,000sf) 96% $587 $430 36.5%
Single Family(less than 1,500sf) 96% $631 $430 46.7%
Single Family(1,500 to 2,499 sf) 96% $672 $483 39.1%
Single Family(2,500 sf or greater) 96% $750 $524 43.1%
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit 96% $381 $2851 33.7%
Mobile Home/RV Park(tied down) 1 96% $428 $3491 22.6%
(1) Calculated based on the average annual growth rate of 1.4%and non-impact fee funding of$50,000
per year.
(2) Source:Calculated impact fee from Table V-11 multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate
(Item 1)
(3) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown do not include the administrative fee.
(4) Percent change from the current adopted fee(Item 2)to the total impact fee(Item 1)
Staff Recommended Fee Rate
Based on a review of capital needs in the near future, the County staff recommends
suspension of library impact fees until the next technical update study. At that time, the
capital expansion needs for libraries will be reviewed and the suspension may need to be
lifted.
Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's library impact fee program, a
comparison of library facilities impact fee schedules was completed for other Florida
counties. Table V-13 presents this comparison. As presented, Indian River County's
calculated fee is higher than fees adopted by other Counties, which reflects the high
investment levels to the County's library facilities.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 62 Impact Fee Update Study
qT
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table V-13
Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
Indian River County
rr• Brevard St.Lucie Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Highlands Martin
Calculated(2) (3) Staff"' Adopted County(s) County County County County County County County'
Growth Rate(s)
Date of Last Update 1 2013 2013 2013 2005 2000 2009 2009 2010 2010 2005 2006 2012
Adoption Percentage 100% n/a n/a 100% 29% 100% 100% 50% 100% 10D-A 100-A 1001%
Residential:
Single Family(2,000sf) du $700 $672 $0 $483 $64 $217 $142 $238 $315 $107 $245 $527
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit 1,000sf $397 $381 $0 $285 $38 $140 $96 $179 $160 $81 $170 $527
Mobile Home/RV Park(tied down) 1,000 sf $446 $428 $0 $349 $46 $170 $101 $228 $237 $107 $139 $527
(1) du=dwelling unit
(2) Source:Table V-11
(3) Source:Table V-12
(4) Indian River County Staff recommends suspension of the library facilities impact fee based on a review of upcoming capital needs.
(5) Source:Indian River County, Fees shown do not include the administrative fee
(6) Source:Brevard County Planning&development Department
(7) Source:St.Lucie County Planning&Development Services Department;Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing
(8) Source:Charlotte County Planning&Land Development Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended
(9) Source:Citrus County Planning&Development Department
(10)Source:Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department;Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing
(11)Source:Hernando County Planning&Development Department
(12)Source:Highlands County Code of Ordinances,Section 13-28;Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30,2014
(13)Source:Martin County Growth Management Department
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 63 Impact Fee Update Study
..0
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
VI. Emergency Services
This section provides the results of the emergency services impact fee analysis. There are
several major elements associated with the development of the emergency services impact
fee:
• Facility Inventory
• Service Area and Population
• Level-of-Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Calculation
• Net Emergency Services Impact Cost
• Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule
• Affordable Growth Strategy
• Staff Recommended Fee Rate
• Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
These various elements are summarized in the remainder of this section with the result
being the calculated emergency services impact fee schedule.
Facility Inventory
Table VI-1 presents the building and land inventory for Indian River County. Indian River
County currently has a total of 12 fire/EMS stations. In addition, the County has a training
tower and owns the land where Station 13 will be built. Table VI-1 summarizes the County's
emergency services land and building inventory. The value of buildings and land are based
on recent construction, insurance and land values of the existing facilities, vacant land sales
and values of parcels with similar characteristics, and information obtained from other
jurisdictions. A more detailed explanation of building and land value estimates is included
in Appendix F.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 64 Impact Fee Update Study
QQ
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VI-1
Land & Buildings Inventory
Facility Year Numberof Square Building Land Total Building
Description Location(l) Acquired/ (1) (1) (2) (3) and Land
Built(l) Acres Feet Value Value Value(4)
Fire Station 1(5) 1500 Old Dixie Hwy,Vero Beach,FL 32960 1986 n/a 10,418 $2,708,680 n/a $2,708,680
Fire Station 2 3301 Bridge Plaza Dr,Vero Beach, FL 32963 2007 0.92 8,436 $2,193,360 $55,200 $2,248,560
Fire Station 3 290043rd Ave,Vero Beach,FL 32960 2007 2.72 9,275 $2,411,500 $163,200 $2,574,700
Fire Station 4 15009th St SW,Vero Beach,FL 32962 2007 2.18 7,440 $1,934,400 $130,800 $2,065,200
Fire Station 5 6580 Old Dixie Hwy,Vero Beach,FL 32967 2007 2.44 7,533 $1,958,580 $146,400 $2,104,980
Fire Station 6 101 South A1A,Vero Beach,FL 32963 1986 2.20 3,080 $800,800 $132,000 $932,800
Fire Station 7 1215 82nd Ave,Vero Beach,FL 32966 1986 0.50 3,136 $815,360 $30,000 $845,360
Fire Station 8 1115 Barber St,Sebastian,FL 32958 1999 1.00 6,243 $1,623,180 $60,000 $1,683,180
Fire Station 9 1640 US 1,Sebastian, FL 32958 2009 7.05 7,386 $1,920,360 $423,000 $2,343,360
Fire Station 10 62 North Broadway,Fellsmere,FL 32948 1996 0.48 5,520 $1,435,200 $28,800 $1,464,000
Fire Station 11 255593rd St,Vero Beach,FL32963 2001 1.51 6,976 $1,813,760 $90,600 $1,904,360
Fire Station 12 362049th St,Vero Beach,FL 32967 2009 4.00 7,386 $1,920,360 $240,000 $2,160,360
TrainingTower(6) 422543rd Avenue,Vero Beach, FL 32967 2008 n/al 2,604 $390,600 n/a $390,600
Planned Station 13 44404th St,Vero Beach,FL 32968 FY 08/09 3.21 n a n a $192,600 $192,600
Total 28.211 85,433 $21,926,140 $1,692,600 $23,618,740
Building Value per Square Foot(7) $257
Land Value perAcrel8l $60,000
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Building square footage multiplied by$260 for primary buildings and$150 for Training Tower based on recent construction, insurance values,information
from other jurisdictions,and discussions with architects/contractors. Appendix F provides further detail.
(3) Number of acres multiplied by land value per acre(Item 8)
(4) Sum of building value(Item 2)and land value(Item 3)
(5) The County does not own,but leases the land for Station 1. As such,it is not included in the inventory
(6) Land associated with the building is included in the inventory of public buildings,as part of the Emergency Operations Center.
(7) Total building value(Item 2)divided by square footage
(8) Land value is estimated at$60,000 per acre based on recent sales,vacant land values of parcels with similar size and/or location. See Appendix F for
additional detail.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
o June 2014 65 Impact Fee Update Study
C
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
In addition to land and buildings, the IRC emergency services inventory includes the
necessary vehicles and equipment required to perform its services. As presented in Table
VI-2, the total vehicle cost is approximately$15 million.
Table VI-2
Vehicle Inventory and Values
Description Units(i) Unit Cost(i) Total Value(2)
Ladder Truck 2 $800,000 $1,600,000
Brush Truck 8 $193,000 $1,544,000
Dive Rescue Unit 1 $130,000 $130,000
3,OOOGallon Tanker Truck 1 $150,000 $150,000
Hazardous Materials Vehicle 1 $150,000 $150,000
Marine Fire Boat 1 $100,000 $100,000
Rigid Hull Inflatable Boat 1 $20,000 $20,000
Fire Engine 16 $465,000 $7,440,000
Ambulance 17 1 $225,0001 $3,825,000
Total $14,959,000
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Units multiplied by unit cost
Table VI-3 presents the equipment inventory and related costs for Indian River County.
Table VI-3
Equipment Inventory and Values
Description Units per Total Units Unit Total
Turnout Gear 15 180 $2,150 $387,000
Lifepack 2 24 $32,000 $768,000
Radio(portable) 5 60 $4,000 $240,000
Radio(vehicle) 4 48 $4,000 $192,000
Stretcher 1 12 $13,000 $156,000
Thermal Imager 1 12 $9,800 $117,600
MSA,Airbag 5 60 $10,885 $653,100
Spreader,Ocutter, K12 1 12 $24,339 $292,068
Suction Unit 1 12 $1,0001 $12,000
Total 1 $2,817,768
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Units per station multiplied by 12(number of stations in Indian River County)
(3) Unit cost multiplied by total units
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 66 Impact Fee Update Study
101
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Service Area and Population
Emergency services are provided by the County in the unincorporated areas and most
municipalities. The Town of Indian River Shores, however, maintains its own fire
department. Therefore, the proper benefit district for emergency services is the entire
county excluding the Town of Indian River Shores. For impact fee calculations, the current
2013 countywide functional population estimate, excluding Indian River Shores, is used,
which is provided in Appendix A,Table A-11.
Because simply using weighted population does not fully address all of the benefactors of
emergency service, the "functional" weekly 24-hour population approach is used to
establish a common unit of demand across different land uses (See Appendix A for further
information).
Level-of-Service
Typically, level of service for emergency services is expressed in terms of stations per 1,000
residents for capital facility planning purposes. Using this method, IRC's current level of
service (LOS) is 1 station per 11,963 residents or 0.084 stations per 1,000 residents. The
County's adopted LOS standard is 0.089 stations per 1,000 residents. Since the achieved
LOS is lower than the adopted LOS standard, the achieved LOS is used in the impact fee
calculations. As mentioned in the previous sections, LOS needs to be measured using
functional population to capture all residents, workers, and visitors that benefit from
emergency services. In terms of functional population, LOS is calculated at 0.088 stations
per 1,000 functional residents. Table VI-4 summarizes the calculation of the LOS standard
using the 2013 population and functional population.
The County has plans to add two stations over the next five years. This would result in a
LOS of 0.095 stations per 1,000 residents. However, since this LOS is not yet achieved,the
existing LOS is used in the impact fee calculations.
Although the LOS is measured in terms of stations per population for planning purposes and
in terms of response time for operational purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the
level of service is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per
resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for emergency
services infrastructure. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net impact cost
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 67 Impact Fee Update Study
(p 2
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
per resident for emergency services, which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan
for impact fee purposes.
Table VIA
Level-of-Service (2013)
Calculation
Population Population
Population(l) 143,561 136,323
Number of Stations(2) 12 12
Population per Station(3) 11,963 11,360
LOS(Stations per 1,000 Residents)(4) 0.084 0.088
Adopted LOSS(Stations per 1,000 Residents)(s) 0.089 0.093
Future LOS:
Population--2017(1) 148,034 140,598
Future Number of Stations(6) 14 14
Future Population perStation(7) 10,574 10,043
Future LOS(Stations per 1,000 Residents)I8i 1 0.0951 0.100
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-11. Figures exclude population of Indian River Shores.
(2) Source:Table VI-1
(3) Population(Item 1)divided by the number of stations(Item 2)
(4) Number of stations(Item 2)divided by the population(Item 1)divided by 1,000
(5) Source: Indian River County
(6) Source: Indian River County Capital Improvement Plan
(7) 2017 population divided by the future number of stations(Item 6)
(8) Future number of stations(Item 7)divided by the 2017 population multiplied by 1,000
Table VI-5 compares the levels of service for other Florida counties as well as the state of
Florida. The LOS is displayed in terms of permanent population for 2012 for the service
area of all entities.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 68 Impact Fee Update Study
103
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VI-5
Level-of-Service Comparison
Service Area Number of Residents per LOS(Stations)
Jurisdiction Population Stations(2) Station(3) per 1,000(4)
Okeechobee County 39,805 2 19,903 0.050
St. Lucie County 280,355 17 16,491 0.061
Hernando County 173,104 14 12,365 0.081
Osceola County 180,821 16 11,301 0.088
Indian River County 135,510 12 11,293 0.089
Col lier County 293,343 28 10,477 0.095
Citrus County 132,285 13 10,176 0.098
St.Johns County 176,128 18 9,785 0.102
Charlotte County 146,373 17 8,610 0.116
Martin County 128,332 15 8,555 0.117
Brevard County 205,690 3116,6351 0.151
Highlands County 98,955 21 4,712 0.212
(1) Source: BEER,2012 final population estimates
(2) Source:County websites and the U.S. Fire Administration,National Fire Department Census
(3) Service area population(Item 1)divided by number of stations(Item 2)
(4) Number of stations(Item 2)divided by the service area population(Item 1)divided by 1,000
Cost Component
Table VI-6 summarizes the total current value of land, buildings, and equipment for
emergency services, including:
• Twelve stations with a total asset value of $23.6 million for buildings and land and
$17.8 million for vehicles and equipment,for a total asset value of$41.4 million; and
• An average value of$3.5 million per station.
In addition, Table VI-6 presents the total impact cost per functional resident for emergency
services in Indian River County, which is calculated by multiplying the net asset value per
station by the LOS (stations per 1,000 functional residents) and dividing that figure by 1,000.
The total impact cost for emergency services provided by the County is $304 per functional
resident.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 69 Impact Fee Update Study
�D�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VI-6
Total Impact Cost
Percent of
Description Figure Total Value(9)
Building Value(1) $21,926,140 52.97%
Land Value(�) $1,692,600 4.09%
Vehicle Value(3) $14,959,000 36.14%
Equipment Value(4) 2,817,768 6.81%
Total Asset Value $41,395,508 100.01%
Number of Stations(5) 12
Cost per Station(6) $3,449,626
LOS(') 0.088
Total Impact Cost per Resident(8) $303.57
(1) Source:Table VI-1
(2) Source:Table VI-1
(3) Source:Table VI-2
(4) Source:Table VI-3
(5) Source:Table VI-1
(6) Total asset value divided by the number of stations(Item 5)
(7) Source:Table VI-4
(8) Cost per station(Item 6)multiplied by the LOS(Item 7)divided by 1,000
(9) Distribution of building,land,vehicle,and equipment values
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging new development for the emergency services impact fee, a review of
the capital financing program for emergency services was completed. The purpose of this
review was to determine any potential revenue credits generated by new development that
are being used for expansion of capital facilities, land, vehicles, and equipment included in
the inventory. It should be noted that the credit component does not include any capital
renovation, maintenance, or operations expenses, as these types of expenditures cannot be
funded with impact fee revenue.
Capital Expansion Expenditure Credit
To calculate the capital expansion expenditure credit per functional resident, the historical
capital expansion projects and those programmed in the CIP are reviewed. During the time
period from 2008 through 2017, the County allocated an average annual non-impact fee
funding of $757,000 toward emergency services capital facilities. The annual capital
expansion expenditures were divided by the average functional residents for the same
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 70 Impact Fee Update Study
!OS
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
period in order to calculate the average capital expansion cost per functional resident.
Although the County used some sales tax revenues toward emergency services capacity
projects, because this amount was insignificant (less than 1 percent of non-impact fee
spending), a separate credit for sales tax revenues was not calculated.
As presented in Table VI-7, the result is an average annual expansion cost of $5.55 per
functional resident.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 71 Impact Fee Update Study
(OL
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VI-7
Capacity Expansion Projects
Expenditure(l) FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Total
Emergency Services District Fund
Fiber Optics $13,097 $13,097
EOC Training Center $610,801 $610,801
Fire Station 12 $40,231 $1,980,929 $59,514 - $2,080,674
Fire Station 13 - - $426,304 $426,304 $852,608
Fire Station 14 - $200,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000
Med Unit $225,000 $225,0001 $450,000
Fire Pumper $457,0001 $457,000 $914,000
One Quint(Fire Apparatus) $800,000 $800,000
optional Sales Tax Revenues
Fire Station 12 $47,2091 $47,209
Emergency Services District Fund and Optional Sales Tax Revenues
Total Capital Expansion Expenditures $711,338 $1,980,929 $59,514 $651,304 $883,304 $425,000 $2,857,000 - $7,568,389
Average Annual Capital Expansion Expenditures(Z) $756,839
Average Functional PopulationM 136,435
Capital Expansion Expenditures per Functional Resident(4) $5.55
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Total capital expansion expenditures divided by 10
(3) Source: Appendix A,Table A-11
(4) Average annual capital expansion expenditures(Item 2)divided by average functional population(Item 3)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 72 Impact Fee Update Study
0
'tel
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Net Emergency Services Impact Cost
The net impact fee per functional resident is the difference between the cost component
and the credit component. Table VI-8 summarizes the calculation of the net emergency
services impact cost per functional resident.
The first section of this table identifies the total impact cost as $304 per functional resident.
The second section of the table identifies the revenue credits for the emergency services
impact fee totaling approximately $102 per functional resident which is equal to the net
present value of the capital expansion credit per functional resident.
The net impact cost per functional resident is the difference between the total impact cost
and the total revenue credit. This results in a net impact cost of $201 per functional
resident,which reflects the relevant LOS for emergency services.
Table VI-8
Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident
Revenue
Impact Cost/Credit Element Impact Cost Credits
Impact Cost
Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(l) $303.57
Revenue Credit
Avg Annual Capital Improvement Credit per Functional Resident(2) $5.55
Capitalization Rate 2.5%
Capitalization Period (in years) 25
Capital Improvement Credit per Resident(3) $102.26
Net Impact Cost
Net Impact Cost per Functional Residential $201.31
(1) Source:Table VI-6
(2) Source:Table VI-7
(3) Average annual capital improvement credit per functional resident(Item 2)over a capitalization rate of
2.5%for 25 years. The capitalization rate estimate is provided by Indian River County.
(4) Total impact cost per functional resident(Item 1)less the total revenue credit per functional resident
(Item 3)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 73 Impact Fee Update Study
!0 8
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule
Table VI-9 presents the calculated emergency services impact fee schedule developed for
Indian River County for both residential and non-residential land uses, based on the net
impact cost per functional resident previously presented in Table VI-8. The table also
includes a comparison to the 2009 adopted fees.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 74 Impact Fee Update Study
101
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table VI-9
Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule
2009Impact Functional Total Impact Percent
ITE LUC Land Use Unit Resident Fee(2) Adopted (4)
Coefficient(1) Fee") Change
RESIDENTIAL:
Single Family(detached)
-Less than 1,000 sf du 1.36 $274 $2471 10.9%
210 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 1.47 $296 $247 19.8%
1,500 to 2,499 sf du 1.56 $314 $278 12.9%
2,500 sf or greater du 1.73 $348 $301 15.6%
220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.90 $181 $176 2.8%
240 IMobile Home/RV(Tied Down) du 0.98 $197 $182 8.2%
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP( ):
310 Hotel I room 1 0.65 $131 $160 -18.1%
320 IMotel I room 1 0.60 $121 $160 -24.4%
252/260 lAssisted Care Living Facility(ACLF)/Nursing Home I bed 1 0.92 $185 $172 7.6%
OFFICE&FINANCIAL(J9d ):
720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000sf or less 1,000sf 1.14 $229 $299 -23.40/,
Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,0005f 1.66 $334 $299 11.7%
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,000sf 2.23 $449 $341 31.7%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 1,000sf 2.28 $459 $280 63.9%
710 General Office 1,000sf 1.00 $201 $246 -18.3%
760 Research&Development Center 1,000sf 0.85 $171 $130 31.5%
INDUSTRIAL( ): r
140 Manufacturing 1,00osf 0.50 $101 $881 14.89/.
150 Warehousing 1,00osf 0.28 $56 $68 -17.6%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000sf 0.06 $12 $13 -7.7%
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse' 1,000 sf 0.14 $28 $68 -58.8%
110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 0.69 $139 $120 15.8%
n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55 $312 $265 17.7%
n/a ISand Mining acre 0.20 $40 $34 17.6%
RETAIL ):
820 Retail 1,000sfgla 2.37 $477 $503 -5.2%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 1.91 $385 $303 27.1%
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 1.47 $296 $300 -1.3%
932 Restaurant 1,000sf 6.78 $1,365 $1,289 5.9%
934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 8.90 $1,792 $1,389 29.0%
850 Supermarket 1,000sf 2.05 $4131 $357 15.7%
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 1.50 $302 $107 182.2%
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay 1 0.87 $175 $332 -47.3%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 5.83 $1,174 $746 57.41%
890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 0.23 $46 $56 -17.9°/
RECREATIONAL( ):
430 Golf Course hole 1.08 $217 $429 -49.4%
492 RaquetClub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 3.09 $622 $417 49.2%
412 County Park acre 0.20 $40 $27 48.1%
491 Tennis Court court 3.16 $636 $408 55.9%
420 Marina berth 0.19 $38 $27 40.7%
GOVERNMENTAL :
732 Post Office 1,000sf 1.62 $326 $3121 4.5%
590 Library 1,000sf 1.76 $354 $3021 17.2%
733 Government Office Complex 1,0005f 1.39 $280 $238 17.6%
571 Jail bed 0.87 $175 $1531 14.4%
MISCELLANEOUS(AddpW):
r640
65 Day Care Center 1,000sf 0.89 $179 $177 1.1%
10 Hospital 1,000sf 1.37 $276 $275 0.4%
Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 2.54 $511 $287 78.0%
60 Church 1,000sf 0.51 $103 $94 9.6%44 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 $1,204 $1,490 -19.2%20 Elementary School(Private,K-5)
student 0.06 $12 $17 -29.4%
522 Middle School(Private,6-8) student 0.07 $14 $17 -17.6%
530 High School(Private,9-12) student 0.08 $16 $21 -23.8%
540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 $20 $18 11.1%
'All Non-Residential fees have been adopted,except the High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse land use
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-14 for residential land uses and A-15 for non-residential land uses
(2) Source:Net impact cost per resident from Table VI-8 multiplied by the functional resident coefficient(Item 1)
(3) Source:Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee.
(4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted fee(Item 3)to the total impact fee(Item 2)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 75 Impact Fee Update Study
Ito
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Affordable Growth Strategy
In the case of emergency services, based on a review of capital expansion expenditures
between 2008 and 2017, the County uses approximately $757,000 per year of non-impact
fee funding. During the next 25 years, the County is expected to grow at an annual rate of
1.4 percent. Figure VI-1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with
different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum
calculated impact fee. This level is compared investment needed to maintain the current
LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of emergency services impact
fee calculated, only approximately 8 percent of this amount is needed to maintain the
current/achieved LOS due to non-impact fee contributions from the existing development
and low rate of population growth. If the impact fee is adopted at a level higher than 8
percent, the LOS is likely to improve as long as the County continues to spend
approximately $757,000 of non-impact fee revenues per year toward capacity projects. In
addition, if the County would like to charge no fee to non-residential land uses, it can do so
and still maintain the existing LOS as long as the fee for residential land uses is adopted at
11 percent.
Figure VI-1
Emergency Services Impact Fee—Affordable Growth Approach
------------------------------
-------------—----------------------------------------------
140% -- --------------------------------------------------------
IRC Average
120% - - ----------------------------------------------
`AnrivatGrowitli` "`"" '
100%
0
To80% ------------- ---------------------- - ---
8% ----------- Total Cost
Maximum Impact Fee
20% - - - -- -- ---
LOS Cum
0% ------7—.-------r
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Annual Growth Rate
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 76 Impact Fee Update Study
!( I
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table VI-10
Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule—Affordable Growth
2009Affordable Total
Impact Growth Impact Adopted (4)
ITE LUC Land Use Unit Adoption (2) Fee(3) Change
Rate Fee
RESIDENTIAL:
Single Family(detached) du 11% $30 $247 -87.9%
-Less than 1,000 sf $247 -86.6%
210 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 11% $
-1,500 to 2,499 4du 11% $35 $278 -87.4%
du 11% $38 $301 -87.4%
2,500sforgreater du 11% $20 $176 -88.6%
220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit
240 Mobile Home/RV(Tied Down) du 11% $22 $182 87.9
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP:
room 019 $0 $160 100.0°/
310 Hotel
room 0% $0 $160 -100.0%
320 Motel bed $0 $172 100.0%
ACLF Nursin 0%
252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility( )/ g Home
OFFICE&FINANCIAL: $299 100.000
Medical office/Clinic 10,000sforless 1,000sf 0% $0
720 1,000 sf 0%
Medical Office/Clinicgreaterthan10,000sf $3q1 -100.0°/
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,000sf 00/. $0
1,OOOsf 0%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In $246 100.0%
710 General Office 1,000sf
760 Research Development Center
1,OOOsf 0% $0 $130 -100.0°/
INDUSTRIALt 1,OOOsf 0% $0 $88 100.0°/
140 Manufacturing $68 -100.0°/
150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0% $0
1,OOOsf 0% $0 $13 -100.0%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000sf 0 $68 -100.0%
% $0
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse 10005f 0% $0 $120 -100.0%
110 General Light Industrial $265 -100.0%
n/a Concrete Plant acre 0% $0
n/a Sand Mining
acre 0% $0 $34 -100.0%
RETAIL:
1,OOOsfgla 00/0 $0 $503 -100.0%
820 Retail $303 -100.0%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 0% $0
1,000sf 0% $0 $300 -100.0%
841 New/Used Auto Sales $1,289 -100.0%
1,000sf
932 Restaurant 1,OO0% $0
sf 0% $0 $1,389 -100.0%
934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru $357 -100.—
850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 0°/ $0
1,OOOsf 0% $0 $107 -100.0°/
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop $332 -100.0%
-Service Car Wash service bay 0% $0
1,OOOsf 0% $0 $746 100
947 Self .0°/
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1000 sf 0% $0 $56 -100.0°/
890 Furniture Store
RECREATIONAL: hole 00/0 $0 $429 -100.0%
430 Golf Course (JOOsf 0
,
1 % $0 $417 -100.0°/
492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio acre 01/0 $0 $27 100.0°/
412 County Park court 01/. $0 $408 100.0°/
491 Tennis Court berth $27 -100.0%
0% $0
420 Marina
GOVERNMENTAL: 312 -100.0°/
732 Post Office 1, sf 0% $0 $
590 Library 1,000OOsf 0% $0 $302 -100.0%
1,000 sf 0% $0 $238 -100.0%
733 Government Office Complex $153 0% -100.0%
bed $0
571 Jail
MISCELLANEOUS: $177 -100.0°/
565 Day Care Center 1sf 0% $0
1,1000000sf 00/0 $0 $275 -100.0%
610 Hospital $287 -100.0%
000c)
1,000OO
640 VeterinaryClinic 1, sf 0% $0
sf 00/0 $0 $94 -100.0%
560 Churchscreen 00/0 $0 $1,490 -100.0%
444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee student 0% $0 $17 -100.0°/
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) $17 -100.0%
522 Middle School(Private,6-8) student 0% $0
student 0% $0 $21 -100.0°/
530 High School(Private,9-12) $0 $18 100.0°/
540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 orfewerstudents student 0%
of$757,000 per year
(1) Based on annual growth rate of-11--non-impact fee spending
(2) Source:Calculated 100%impact fee from Table VI-9 multiplied by affordable growth adoption rate(Item 1)
(3) Source:Indian River County;fees do not include administrative fee
(4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates(Item 3)to the total impact fee(Item 2)
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. 77 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
112
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Staff Recommended Fee Rate
In the case of emergency services, the County staff recommends adopting the full
calculated fee to fund the needed capital projects in this area and be able to allocate a
larger portion of the ad valorem dollars for operational expenses.
Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's emergency services impact fee
program, a comparison of impact fee schedules was completed for other Florida counties.
Table VI-11 presents this comparison.
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 78
It a
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table VI-11
Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Collier Hernando Highlands Martin St.Johns
AffordableIndian River County 2009 Brevard Okeechobee St.Lucie Osceola Charlotte Citrus 1131 county('�) County(i') county""
Land Use Unit"' Calculated1z) Growth"' I Adopted
2005 2006 2012 2011
2006 2009 2010 2010
2013 2005 2000 2012 2009 SO`v 100% 1ppo� 1pp^/ 100% 100°/
2013 2013 1000
Date of Last Update n/a 100°h 1pp�� 100°
100° n/a
Adoption Percentage lgg $393 $94 $235 $759 $599 $690
Resldentfal: du $314 $35 $314 $278 $93 5394 $557 $165 $
Single Family(2,0D0sf) 46 $84 $331 $12 $18
Non-Residendalr'. n/a $82 $74 $50 $63 226 $
1,000 sf $139 $0 $139 $120 226 $95 $171 $800 $80 $216
Light Industrial 1 Opp sf $139 $0 $201 $246 $44 $191 $329 $90 $115 $ 319 $125
office(50,000 sq ft) p00 sf $201 $p $477 $503 $207 $408 $517 $300 $176 q55 $153 $328
Retail(100,000 sq ft) 1, 55 $603 $510 $4,317 $575 $109
Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $459 $0 $459 $280 $105 $408 $517 $300 $250
Fast w/Driv Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $$459 $0 $1,792 $1,389 $552 $408 $517 $1,390 $715 $4
ood
(1) du=dwelling unit
(2) Source:Table VI-9
(3) Source:Table VI-10
(4) Source:Table VI-9;Indian River County Staff recommends the full calculated fee rates
(5) Source:Indian River County. Fees shown do not include the administrative fee
(6) Source:Brevard County Planning&Development Department;Fire/Rescue and EMS rates are combined;Industrial land used are exempt from impact fees
(7) Source:Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners Administration Department
(8) Source:St.Lucie County Planning&Development Services Department;Fees have been increased to above rates throughelane". Fees haveindexing been reduced to above rates through
annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended
(9) Source:Osceola County Community Development Department
(10)Source:Charlotte County Planning&Land Development Department. In Charlotte,bank w/drive-thru is charged"p
(11)Source:Citrus County Planning&Development Department
(12)source:Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department;EMS rates only;Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing
(13)Source:Hernando County Planning&Development Department;Fire and EMS rates are combined
(14)Source:Highlands County Code of Ordinances,Section 13-28;Fire/Rescue and EMS rates are combined;Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30,2014
(15)Source:Martin County Growth Management Department ave been increased to above rates through annual indexing
(16)Source:St.Johns County Planning&Zoning Department;Fees h
Indian River County
Impact Fee Update Study
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. 79
June 2014
L
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
VII. Law Enforcement
Law enforcement impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of
police service related land, facilities and capital equipment required to support the
additional law enforcement service demand created by new growth. This section of the
report presents the results of the law enforcement impact fee update study for Indian River
County and will serve as the technical support document for the calculated law
enforcement impact fee schedule.
There are several major elements associated with the development of the law enforcement
impact fee. These include:
• Facility Inventory
• Service Area and Population
• Level-of-Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost
• Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule
• Affordable Growth Strategy
• Staff Recommended Fee Rate
• Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
Facility Inventory
According to information provided by the IRC Sheriff's Office (IRCSO) and the County, Indian
River County has 68,000 square feet of building space and almost 13 acres of land
associated with law enforcement services. Table VII-1 presents this information.
Building value is estimated based on recent construction, insurance values of existing
buildings, and information from other Florida jurisdictions. Land value is based on the value
of parcels where existing buildings are located and an analysis of vacant land sales and
values. Additional information is provided in Appendix F.
It should be noted that, in addition to these buildings, IRCSO leases several buildings to
accommodate substations and storage facilities. For the purposes of this impact fee study,
the inventory includes only the space owned by the County.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
Indian River County
June 2014 80 Impact Fee Update Study
IlS
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VII-1
Land and Building Inventory
DescriptionYear Total Square Allocated Building Land Total Building
Numberof Square Footage on (3) (4) (5) and Land
Facility
Built(l) Site -
Primary Buildings:
Sheriff's Administration Building 1988 33,332 6.88 $6,666,400 $344,000 $7,010,400
Sheriff's Fleet Compound 1988 9,856 2.03 $1,971,200 $101,500 $2,072,700
9.81 47,552
General Services Building N/A 2,100 0.43 $420,000 $21,500 $441,500
1,000 0.21 $200,000 $10,500 $210,500
Sheriffs Crime Scene Evidence Addition 2003 N/A $117,400 N/A $117,400
Courthouse Security N/A N/Am 587 122,501 N/A $382,800 N/A $382,800
Courthouse Civil Process N/A 1,914
SunSky Office Space 2011 4,920 0.75 $984,000 $37,500 $1,021,500
2.75 18,146
Crime Scene Building 2013 13,226 2.00 $2,645,200 $100,000 $2,745,200
Miscellaneous Support Buildings On-Site:
264 0.05 $13,200 $2,500 $15,700
Base N/A 9.81 47,552
rBuilding
g/Maintenance Shed N/A 1,000 0.21 $50,000 $10,500 $60,500
68,199 12.56 $13,450,200 $628,000 $14,078,200
$197
e per Square Footi$i $50,000er Acrel9l
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Represents square footage of all buildings on the associated acreage(whether law enforcement-related or not)
(3) Number of acres divided by the total square footage on-site,multiplied by square footage
(4) Calculated based on$200 per square foot for primary buildings and$50 per square foot for support buildings
(5) Allocated acreage(Item 3)multiplied by land value per acre(Item 9)
(6) Sum of building and land values(Items 4 and 5)
(7) Acreage included in the public buildings impact fee calculations
(8) Total building value divided by total square footage
(9) Estimated based on value of current parcels,a review of recent sales and vacant land values of parcels with similar size and location
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 81
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
In addition to the land and buildings inventory, the IRCSO also has the vehicles and
equipment to perform its law enforcement duties. Table IV-2 summarizes the equipment
and vehicle inventory.
Table VII-2
Equipment and Vehicle Inventory
TotalEquipment Units(l) Unit(2)
Value
Vehicles 281 $13,347 $3,750,435
Vehicle/Radio Equipment 1,577 $1,523 $2,401,999
Weapons 450 $535 $240,733
Office Equipment 1 $148,292 $148,292
Specialty Vehicles/Equipment 2 $65,266 $130,532
Electronic Equipment 1 $196,760 $196,760
Computer Equipment 1 $1,604,426 $1,604,426
Misc. Equipment 1 $890,490 $890,490
F
1 Center Equipment 76 $7,723 586 930
tal Equipment Value $9,950,597
(1) Source:Indian River County
(2) Calculated by dividing the total value by number of units
Service Area and Population
Law enforcement services are provided by the IRCSO in the unincorporated areas of the
County. Municipalities within IRC have their own police departments. Therefore, the
proper benefit district for law enforcement is the unincorporated county and weighted
seasonal population for unincorporated county is used in the impact fee calculations. In
addition, because law enforcement services are provided to all land uses and all residents,
visitors, and workers, the "functional" population for unincorporated county is calculated
and used as well. Appendix A provides further information on population estimates.
Level-of-Service
Based on the information provided by the County, the Indian River County's 2013 level-of-
service is 1.89 law enforcement officers per 1,000 weighted residents. The County's
adopted LOS standard is 2.09 officers per 1,000 residents. Table VII-3 presents this
information. Given that the achieved LOS is lower than the adopted LOS standard and new
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
Indian River County
June 2014 82 Impact Fee Update Study
11�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
development cannot be charged for a higher LOS than what is being provided, the achieved
LOS is used in the impact fee calculations.
The County does not have any new law enforcement capital facilities programmed in the
Five-Year CIP; however, the Sheriff's Master Plan identifies needs for additional
administrative space and a crime scene investigation unit. The estimated cost for this
project is $25 million to $30 million. Due to lack of funding, this project is not yet
programmed. Since the timing of this project is not known yet, a future LOS estimate is not
calculated.
While the 2013 LOS is 1.89 officers per 1,000 weighted residents, in order to calculate the
law enforcement facilities impact fee, the LOS needs to be calculated in terms of officers
per 1,000 functional residents. Table VII-3 also illustrates the calculation of the current LOS
using the total functional residents within the service area. The current LOS of law
enforcement facilities is 2.11 officers per 1,000 functional residents.
Table VII-3
Level-of-Service(2013)
Year 2013
Component Weighted Functional
Population Population I
Population(l) 97,681 87,590
NumbEofficers(2) 185 185
LOS(oper 1,000 residents)
131 1.89 2.11
Adopted LOS Standard(officers per 1,000 residents)l41 2.09 2.33
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-1 for weighted population and Table A-11 for functional population;
Unincorporated population
(2) Source: Indian River County Sheriff's Office
(3) Number of officer(Item 2)divided by the population(Item 1)multiplied by 1,000
(4) Source: Indian River County
Table VII-4 summarizes a LOS comparison between Indian River County and other Florida
counties. The LOS is displayed in terms of permanent population for all jurisdictions
because a functional population analysis has not been completed for these entities. The
LOS comparison is based on the permanent population for 2012, as this is the most recent
population data available for all jurisdictions. As presented in this table, the Indian River
County's LOS is on the high end of these other communities.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
Indian River County
June 2014 83 Impact Fee Update Study
ll $
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VII-4
Level-of-Service Comparison
Service Area Numberof • (Officers
Jurisdiction Population Officers(l) per 1,000(2)
Residents)
Collier County 293,744 270 0.92
St.Johns County 176,721 219 1.24
Highlands County 77,041 99 1.29
Charlotte County 146,373 189 1.29
Citrus County 140,761 181 1.29
Hernando County 165,402 216 1.31
Okeechobee County 34,227 47 1.37
Martin County 128,656 183 1.42
St. Lucie County 71,457 137 1.92
Osceola County 180,821 358 1.98
Indian River County(Existing) 92,795 185 1.99
Brevard County 223,781 474 2.12
(1) Source: Indian River County and Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal
Justice Agency Profile Report,2012
(2) Permanent population(Item 1)divided by the number of officers(Item 2)divided by
1,000
Finally, although the LOS is measured in terms of officers per population for planning
purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of
investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity
investment made by the County for law enforcement infrastructure. This figure is shown
later in this section in terms of net impact cost per resident for law enforcement capital
facilities,which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes.
Cost Component
The cost component of the study evaluates the cost of capital items, including buildings,
land, vehicles, and equipment. Table VII-5 provides a summary of all capital costs, which
amounts to approximately$130,000 per sworn law enforcement officer.
Table VII-5 also presents the cost per functional resident for the impact fee analysis. This
cost was calculated as the total capital cost of approximately$130,000 per officer multiplied
by the LOS of 2.11 officers per 1,000 functional residents divided by 1,000. As shown in the
following table, the total impact cost per resident is approximately $274 for law
enforcement facilities.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 84 Impact Fee Update Study
Ilq
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VII-5
Unit Cost per Functional Resident
Percentof
Component Cost Total(9)
Value
Building Value(i) $13,450,200 55.98%
Land Value(2) $628,000 2.61%
Vehicle and Equipment Value(3) $9.950.597 41.41%
Total Asset Value(4) $24,028,797 100.00•/0
Number of Officers(5) 185
Total Asset Value per Officer(6) $129,885
Level-of-Service (Officers/1,000 Functional Residents)(7) 2.11
Cost per Functional Resident(8) $274.06
(1) Source:Table VII-1
(2) Source:Table VII-1
(3) Source:Table VII-2
(4) Sum of building value(Item 1),land value(Item 2),and vehicle/equipment value(Item 3)
(5) Source:Table VII-3
(6) Total asset value(Item 4)divided by number of officers(Item 5)
(7) Source:Table VII-3
(8) Total asset value per officer(Item 6)multiplied by the LOS(Item 7)divided by 1,000
(9) Distribution of building,land,vehicle and equipment values
Credit Component
A review of historical expenditures as well as projects programmed in the Five-Year CIP
suggested that there were no non-impact fee funding used toward capacity projects
between 2008 and 2017. As such, a credit for non-impact fee funding is not needed.
Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost
Given that there is no credit, net law enforcement impact cost is $274 per resident, as
shown previously in Table VII-5, which is also the relevant LOS measure for impact fee
calculation purposes.
Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule
A law enforcement impact fee schedule was developed for residential and non-residential
land uses and is illustrated in Table VII-6.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 85 Impact Fee Update Study
120
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table VII-6
Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule
2009Functional Total Impact
Land Use Impact Resident Adopted (4)
ITE LUC Unit Coefficient Feei�) Fee(3) Change
RESIDENTIAL,
Wthan
ily(detached)
1,000sf du 1.39 $381 $218 74.8%210 ,499sf du 1.50 $411 $218 88.5%2,499sf du 1.59 $436 $245 78.0%rgreater du
1.77 $485 $265 83.0°/220ily/Accessory Unit du 0.91 $249 $148 68.2%240me/RV(Tied Down) du 0.89 $244 $158 54.4%
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP( ):
310Hotel room 0.65 $178 $140 27.1%
320 Motel room 0.60 $164 $140 17.1%
252/620 Assisted Care Living Facility(ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 $252 $151
OFFICE&FINANCIAL( ' ):
Medical Office/Clinic 10,000sf or less 1,000 sf 1.14 $312 $262 19.1%
720
Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf
1,000 sf 1.66 $455 $262 73.7%
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,000 sf 2.23 $611 $299 104.3%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In
1,000 sf 2.28 $625 $245 155.1%
710 General Office 1,000 sf 1.00 $274 $216 26.9%
760 Research&Development Center 1,000 sf 0.85 $233 $114 104.4%
INDUSTRIAL( ):
140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf 0.50 $137 $77 77.9%
150 Warehousing 1,000 sf 0.28 $77 $59 30.5%
151Mini-Ware house/Storage 1,000 sf 0.06 $16 $12 33.3%
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse* 1,000 sf 0.14 $38 $59 -35.6%
110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 0.69 $189 $105 80.0°/
n/aConcrete Plant acre 1.55 $425 $232 83.2%
n/a Sand Mining acre 0.20 $55 $30 83.3%
RETAIL( ): 1,000 gsf 2.37 $650 $441 47.4%
820 Retail
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 1.91 $523 $265 97. %
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 1.47 $403 $263 53.22%
1,OOOsf 6.78 $1,858 $1,129 64.6%
932 Restaurant
934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 8.90 $2,439 $1,217 100.4%
1
850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 2.05 $562 $313 79.6%
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf 1.50 $411 $114 260.5%
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 $238 $291 -18.2%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 5.83 $1,598 $653 144.7%
890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 0.23 $63 $49 28.6%
RECREATIONAL( ):
0 hole 1.08 $296 $376 21.3%
43Golf Course
492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 3.09 $847 $366 131.4%
412 County Park acre 0.20 $55 $23 139.1%
491 Tennis Court court 3.16 $866 $3571 142.6%
$24
420 Marina berth 0.19 $52 116.7%
GOVERNMENTAL( ted):
732 Post Office 1,000 sf 1.62 $444 $273 62.6%
1,000 sf 1.76 $482
590 Library $265 81.9%
1OOOsf 1.39 $381 $209 82.3%
733 Government Office Complex ,
bed 0.87 $238 $134 77.6%
571 Jail
MISCELLANEOUS(AdOPW):
565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 0.89 $244 $155 57.4%
610 Hospital 1,000 sf 1.37 $375 $241 55.6%
640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 2.54 $696 $251 177.3%
560 Church 1,000 sf 0.51 $140 $82 70.7%
444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 $1,639 $1,305 25.6%
S20 Elementary School(Private,K-5) student 0.06 $16 $14 14.3%
522 Middle School(Private,6 8) student 0.07 $19 $14 35.7%
530 High School(Private,9-12) student 0.08 $22 $18 22.2%
540/550 University/Junior Col lege with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 $27 $16 68.8%
n/a Fire Station 1.000 sf 0.63 $173 $97 78.4%
Note:gsf=gross square feet
*All Non-Residential fees have been adopted,except the High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse land use
(1) Source:Functional resident coefficients from Appendix A,Table A-13 for residential and lodging land uses and Table A-15 for non-residential land uses
r functional resident(Table VII-5)by the functional resident coefficient(Item 1)
(2) Calculated impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost pe
for each land use
(3) Source:Indian River County.Fees do not include the administrative fee.
(4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates(Item 3)to the total impact fee(Item 2)
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc.
86 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
Z`
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Affordable Growth Strategy
Currently, it appears that the only funding source available for law enforcement capital
facilities is the impact fee. As such, unless another revenue source is identified, any
reduction in the impact fee will result in a decline in the LOS. In addition, the current
achieved LOS is lower than the adopted LOS standard. As mentioned previously, the
Sheriff's Master Plan identifies two projects that are estimated to cost approximately $25
million to $35 million. These projects are not yet programmed due to lack of funding.
Given these, the policy decision should focus on the LOS and whether the adopted and/or
existing LOS should be reduced or impact fees and/or other revenue sources should be used
to maintain/improve the LOS.
Staff Recommended Fee Rate
The County staff recommends adopting the full calculated impact fee for law enforcement
services.
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's law enforcement impact fee
schedule, the County's calculated impact fee schedule was compared to the adopted fee
schedule and those in similar or nearby jurisdictions. Table VII-7 presents this comparison.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 87 Impact Fee Update Study
l22
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table VII-7
Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule
2009Indian River County
St.Lucie Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Highlands Martin St.Johns
Land Use Unit(i) Calculatecil" Staff"' Adopted County(5) County(6l Countyt') County(8) County County County"" County"')
Date of last Update 2013 2013 1 2005 2009 2 12010 2010 2005 2006 2012 2011
Adoption Percentage 100% n/a 100% 100°/ 100°/ 50% 0% 100°/ 100°/100 100°/ 100%
Residential:
Single Family(2,OOOsf) du $436 $436 $245 $206 $83 $290 $449 $86 $230 $760 $84
Non-Residential:
Light Industrial 1,000sfM$2,439 $2,439
$105 $48 $29 $66 $149 $31 n/a $158 $30
office(50,DOOsgft) 1,000sf $216 $317 $52 $166 $307 $62 n/a $274 $89
Retai1(100,000sgft) 1,000sf $441 $351 $81 $335 $531 $121 n/a $742 $171
Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,OOOsf $245 $305 $113 $335 $492 $121 n/a $481 $67
Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $1,217 $305 $324 $335 $1,946 $187 n/a $2,757 $150
(1) du=dwelling unit
(2) Source:Table VII-6
(3) Source:Table VII-6;Indian River County Staff recommends the full calculated fee rates
(4) Source:Indian River County.Fees shown do not Include the administrative fee
(5) Source:St.Lucie County Planning&Development Services Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing
(6) Source:Charlotte County Planning&Land Development Department. In Charlotte,bank w/drive-thru is charged"per lane". Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual Indexing.
Fees are currently
suspended
(7) Citrus County Planning&Development Department
(8) Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department;Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing
(9) Source:Hernando County Planning&Development Department
(10)Source:Highlands County Code of Ordinances,Section 13-28;Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30,2014
(11)Source:Martin County Growth Management Department
(12)Source:St.Johns County Planning&Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc.
88 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
N
w
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
VIII. Parks & Recreation Facilities
This section discusses the analysis used in the development of the parks and recreation
impact fee. To develop the proposed parks and recreation impact fee schedule, multiple
elements must be addressed, including:
• Inventory of Land and Recreation Facilities
• Service Area and Population
• Level-of-Service
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net Parks& Recreation Facilities Impact Cost
• Calculated Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
• Affordable Growth Strategy
• Staff Recommended Fee Rate
• Parks& Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
These various elements are summarized throughout this section, with the result being the
proposed parks and recreation impact fee schedule.
Inventory of Land and Recreation Facilities
According to information provided by IRC, the County owns 29 parks located in the
unincorporated county. In addition, there are five parks where the land is not owned by the
County, but the facilities are. As such, only the facilities in these parks are included in the
inventory. Parks that are owned by the County, but located in cities are excluded since the
impact fee is collected only in the unincorporated county. Finally, recreation facilities that
generate revenue (such as golf courses and the shooting range) are also excluded from the
inventory. IRC parks and recreational facilities can be classified into three different types,
depending on the population and areas they serve and types of amenities offered. The
Recreation and Open Space Element of the County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan includes
definitions of each park type. Table VIII-1 provides the parks and recreation inventory used
as the basis for the impact fee. It is important to note that IRC conducted a detailed GIS
analysis to ensure that only the useable park upland acreage is included in the inventory,
excluding wetlands, habitat land, etc. This approach results in conservative impact fee
levels.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 89 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table VIII-1
Indian River County Parks&Recreation Facilities Inventory
Total Basketball Boat Canoe Community Dune Fishing "g.ng Lifeguard Maintenance Multi-Purpose Olympic Picnic Play- Soccer Softball Swimming Tennis Volleyball
N ame of the Park/Fad I i ty Acreage Ownership class Court Ramp Launch Center Walkover Pier Trails Tower Facility Building(sf) Alul"" Paivili- g..nd
Field Field Pool Court, Count
miles) Center
45'Street Dock 1.00 County R 1
Ambersand Beach Park 0.30 County R 1
Blue Cypress Lake Park 10.00 County R 2 1 1 1
Boat Island 5.00 FIND"' R 4 1
C-54 Stick Marsh Recreation Area 4.56 SIRWMD"' R 4 1 1 2
CR-512 Recreation Area 6.00 SJRWMD" R 2 1 2 1
Dale Wimbrow Park 27.25 County R 1 0.50 3 1 1
Donald MacDonald Park 27.25 County R 1 1 0.50 2,500 1 1
Gifford Park 38.96 County R 2 6,006 1.00 1,400 3 1 3 1 2 1 2
Golden Sands Park 14.30 County R 1 1 4 1 1
Grovenor Estates Park 4.65 County N
Helen Hanson Park 2.00 C.unly N 1 1 1
Hosie-Schumann Park 2.00 County N 1 1
IRC Fairgrounds 137.92 County R 0.25 1 70,000 3 1
IRC Parks Maintenance Facility N/A County I R I 1 1 8,850
IRC Shooting Range 50.00 State R 1,500 1
Joe S.Farman Park 1.00 County R 1 2
Kiwanis-Hobart Park 71.43 County R 1 1.00 7 3 2 2
MILK Park 5.84 County N 1
North County Regional Park 155.00 State R 0.50 4D0 1 1 1 4
Oslo Road Boat Ramp 0.30 County R 1
Pine Hill(Lone Pine) 0.50 County N 1 1
Roseland Community Center 2.00 County N 1,401 1 1 1 1
Round Island Beach Park 9.36 County R 1 1 0.25 1 6 1 1
Round Island Park West 17.00 County R 2 1 1 0.25 1 1 1
Sebastian Canoe Launch Park 1.03 County C 1 1
South County Regional Park 72.70 County R 2 1.00 800 30 1 3 4 4 2 1
Tracking Station Beach 5.50 County R 1 1 1
Treasure Shores Park(North Beach Complex) 17.00 County R 1 0.25 1 1 1 1
Wabasso Beach Park 1.00 County R 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
Wabasso Causeway Park 5.00 County R 3 2 2 7 1 1
Wabasso Island River Park 54.00 County R 2 1 1 3 1
Wabasso School Park 7.36 CountyN 1 1 1
West Wabasso Park 10.00 County N 2 1.00 3 1 1 1 1 1
Total(County Owned) 10 18 5 7407 7 35 6.50 5 8,650 76,600 1 59 13 32 6 14 1 5 4
Total Basketball Boat N,Oce
Community Dune Fishing Jogging Lifeguard Maintenance Multi-Purpose Olympic Picnic Play- Soccer Softball Swimming Tennis Volleyball
Summary of Parks&Recreation Facilities Acreage Court Ram Center Walkover Pier Trails Tower FacilityBuildingsf Aquatic Pavilion Restraoms
Pmiles 1 ) Center around Field Field Pool Courts Court
Neighborhood Parks 3435 5 0 1,401 0 1 1.0 0 0 0 0 4 5 4 0 2 0 1 1
Community Parks 1.03 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Tonal Parks 51127 5 18 6,006 7 14 5.5 5 8,850 76,600 1 54 8 28 6 12 1 4 3
TOTAL 546.65 10 18 7,407 7 15 6.50 S 8,850 76,600 1 59 13 32 6 14 1 5 4
(1) Source:Indian River County
(2) Florida Inland Navigation District
(3) St.John's River Water Management District
Red text indicates that the acreage was not included in the total acreage summary since it is not owned by the County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 90 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Service Area and Population
IRC provides parks and recreation facilities and services in the unincorporated areas of the
county. The municipalities provide these facilities and services within their respective
jurisdictions. As a result, the parks and recreation impact fee analysis will consider only
unincorporated county area population and parks and recreational facilities located within
the unincorporated county area. Appendix A, Table A-1, provides the estimated
unincorporated area population for 2013 and the projected unincorporated area population
through 2040. Parks impact fees are charged only to residential land uses. As such, the
weighted seasonal population per housing unit is used to measure demand from each
residential land use, which is presented in Appendix A,Table A-3.
Level-of-Service
The current LOS for all county-owned and maintained neighborhood, community and
regional parks in unincorporated county is 5.59 acres per 1,000 residents. Table VIII-2
presents the calculation of the current LOS for each park type included in the inventory, as
well as Indian River County's adopted LOS standard of 6.61 acres per 1,000 residents.
The impact fee cannot charge new growth at a rate to correct existing deficiencies. In
addition, there needs to be a commitment to continue providing the LOS used in the impact
fee calculation, which is typically achieved through the adopted LOS standard. For impact
fee calculation purposes, this study used the lower of the two figures to provide a
conservative approach. With this approach, the current achieved LOS is used in the
calculation of the parks and recreation impact fee.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 91 Impact Fee Update Study
7.(0
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VIII-2
Current Level-of-Service (2013)
Calculation Step Figure
2013 Unincorporated Population(l) 97,681
Current Regional Parks Number ofAcres(2) 511.27
Current Regional Parks LOS Component(Acres per 1,000 Residents)(3) 5.23
Current Neighborhood Parks Number of Acres(2) 34.35
Current Community Parks Number of Acres(2) 1.03
Total Number of Acres(Neighborhood and Community)(4( 35.38
Current Neighborhood&Community Parks LOS Component(Acres per 1,000 Residents)(') 0.36
Current Total Parks LOS(Acres per 1,000 Residents)(6) 5.59
Adopted Total Parks LOS Standard(Acres per 1,000 Residents)(7) 6.61
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-1; Unincorporated County
(2) Source:Table VIII-1
(3) Current regional parks number of acres(Item 2)divided by the unincorporated population(Item 1),
multiplied by 1,000 residents.
(4) Sum of current neighborhood parks number of acres and current community parks number of acres.
(5) Current neighborhood/community parks number of acres(Item 4)divided by the unincorporated
population(Item 1), multiplied by 1,000 residents.
(6) Sum of current regional parks LOS(Item 3)and current neighborhood/community parks LOS(Item 5).
(7) Source: Indian River County
Table VIII-3 presents a comparison of the parks and recreation adopted LOS standards of
other Florida counties to Indian River County's adopted LOS standards. Based on this
comparison, Indian River County's adopted LOS standards are in the range of the required
acreage per 1,000 residents in other communities.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 92 Impact Fee Update Study
lA7
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VIII-3
Level-of-Service Comparison
LOS Standard
Jurisdiction (Acres per 00•
Brevard County(2) 3.00
Martin County(3) 3.00
Collier County(4) 3.90
Hernando County(5) 4.00
Citrus County(6) 4.50
Okeechobee County(7) 5.50
Indian River County(Existing)(8) 5.59
Indian River County(Adopted)(9) 6.61
St. Lucie County(10) 7.50
Charlotte County(11) 10.00
Highlands County(12) 10.00
Osceola County(13) 10.00
St.Johns County(14) 28.00
Average(excluding IRC) 8.13
(1) Adopted LOS standards provided only include community, regional,and
other similar types of parks and exclude local parks
(2) Source: Brevard County Comprehensive Plan
(3) Source: Martin County FY 2013 Capital Improvement Program
(4) Source:Collier County 2013 AUIR
(5) Source: Hernando County Comprehensive Plan
(6) Source:Citrus County Comprehensive Plan
(7) Source:Okeechobee County Parks&Recreation Master Plan
(8) Source:Table VIII-2
(9) Source: Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(10)Source:St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan
(11)Source:Smart Charlotte 2050 Comprehensive Plan
(12)Source: Highlands County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
(13)Source:Osceola County Comprehensive Plan
(14)Source:St.Johns County 2025 Comprehensive Plan
Although the LOS is measured in terms of acres per population for planning purposes, for
impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or
dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by
the County for park land and facilities. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of
net impact cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities, which should be included in
the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 93 Impact Fee Update Study
128
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Cost Component
The total cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities consists of two components:
the cost of purchasing and developing land for each park and the cost of facilities and
equipment located at each park.
Land Cost
Because of recent fluctuations in land values statewide, a detailed analysis of land values for
each type of park (and the geographic subareas within the county) was conducted. This
analysis takes into consideration current land value of the existing parks as reported by the
Indian River County Property Appraiser as well as an analysis of recent sales of vacant land
similar in size and location to Indian River County's parks. Based on this analysis, an average
land value of $50,000 per acre is used in the impact fee calculations. Appendix F provides
the data used for this analysis.
The cost of land for parks and recreation facilities includes more than just the purchase cost
of the land. Landscaping/site improvement and utilities/paving costs are also considered.
These costs can vary greatly, depending on the type of services offered at each park. Based
on information provided by the County, as well as information from similarly sized
jurisdictions and park types, basic landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs were
estimated and are presented in Table VIII-4.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 94 Impact Fee Update Study
� 24
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table VIII-4
Land Cost per Resident
Facility/Calculation Step Cost per Acre
Land Purchase Cost perAcre(l) $50,000
Landscaping,Site Preparation,and Irrigation Costs(per acre)(2) $5,000
Utilities and Paving(per acre)(3)
20 000
Total Land Cost per Acre(4) $75,000
Regional Parks LOS(acres per 1,000 Residents)(5) S.23
Land Cost per Resident-Regional Park Component(6) $392.25
Neighborhood/Community Parks LOS(acres per 1,000 Residents)(5) 0.36
Land Cost per Resident-Neighborhood/Community Park Component(') $27.00
Land Cost per Resident-All Parks(8) $419.25
(1) Source:Appendix F,Table F-10
(2) Source: Indian River County
(3) Source: Indian River County
(4) Sum of land purchase cost(Item 1),landscaping,site preparation,and irrigation costs(Item 2),and
utilities and paving per acre cost(Item 3)
(5) Source:Table VIII-2
(6) Total land cost per acre(Item 4)multiplied by regional parks LOS,divided by 1,000
(7) Total land cost per acre(Item 4)multiplied by neighborhood/community parks LOS,divided by 1,000
(8) Sum of land cost per resident for regional parks(Item 6)and neighborhood/community parks(Item 7)
Facility and Equipment Cost
The second step in calculating the total cost for parks and recreation services in Indian River
County involves estimating the current value of recreational facilities. When available, the
value for the parks facilities and equipment is estimated based on recent bids or purchases
made by the County for its park facilities. When recent bid/purchase information was not
available, unit costs from the County's insurance reports and recent costs for similar
facilities from other jurisdictions were used.
As presented in Table VIII-5,the total park facility value is$3.3 million for neighborhood and
community parks and $40.7 million for regional parks, for a combined total of $44 million,
including facilities, equipment, and architecture and engineering (A&E) costs.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 95 Impact Fee Update Study
130
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table VIII-5
Recreational Facility Asset Value
Neighborhood/
Facility
UnitValue(2) Community Parks Total Cost
• .
l value
Basketball Court Description court $55,000 5 $275,000 5 275,0001 550,000
Boat Ramp ramp lane $100,000 0 $0 18 $1,800,000 $1,800,000
Canoe Launch launch $188,000 1 $188,000 4 $752,000 $940,000
Community Center sq ft $180 1,401 $252,180 6,006 $1,081,080 $1,333,260
Dune Walkover walkover $43,000 0 $0 7 $301,000 $301,000
Fishing Pier pier $12,500 1 $12,500 14 $175,000 $187,500
Jogging Trails mile $150,000 1.0 $150,000 5.5 $825,000 $975,000
Lifeguard Tower tower $25,000 0 $0 5 $125,000 $125,000
Maintenance Facility sq ft $100 0 $0 8,850 $885,000 $885,000
Multi-Purpose Bldg sq ft $150 0 $0 76,600 $11,490,000 $11,490,000
Olympic Aquatic Center center $3,000,000 0 $0 1 $3,000,000 00,
$3,0000
Picnic Pavilion pavilion $40,000 5 $200,000 54 $2,160,000 $2,360,000
Playground playground $90,000 5 $450,000 8 $720,000 $1,170,000
Restroom restroom $85,000 4 $340,000 28 $2,380,000 $2,720,000
Soccer field field $325,000 0 $0 6 $1,950,000 $1,950,000
Softball Field field $500,000 2 $1,000,000 12 $6,000,000 $7,000,000
Swimming Pool pool $2,000,000 0 $0 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
$200
Tennis Courts court $50,000 1 $50,000 4 ,000 $250 000
,
Volleyball Court court $20,000 1 $20,000 3 $60,000 $80,000
Facilities and Equipment Value $2,937,680 $36,179,080 $39,116,760
Architecture,Engineering,and Inspection @ 12.5%(8) $367,210 $4,522,385 $4,889,595
Total Facilities and Equipment Valuei9) $3,304,890 $40,701,465 $44,006,355
Total Number of Acres(10) 35.38 511.27 546.65
Facilities and Equipment Value per Acre
µi) $93,411 $79,609 $80,502
Level-of-5ervicei12) 0.36 5.23 5.59
123) 6
Facilities and Equipment Value per Resident $33.63 $416.3 $449.99
(1) Source: Table VIII-1
(2) Based on insurance values of existing facilities,in
from previous studies for IRC as well as
information from other Florida jurisdictions
(3) Source:Table VIII-1
(4) Unit value(Item 2)multiplied by the number of units per facility(Item 3)
(5) Source:Table VIII-1
(6) Unit replacement value(Item2)multiplied by the number of units per facility(Item 5)
(7) Sum of the total value for community parks(Item 4)and the total value of regional parks(Item 6)
(8) Facility and equipment value multiplied by 12.5%based on discussions with Indian River County
(9) Sum of the facilities and equipment replacement value and the architecture,engineering,and inspection
cost(Item 8)for each park
(10)Source:Table VIII-1
(11)Total facilities and equipment cost(Item 9)divided by the total number of acres(Item 10)for each park
type
(12)Source:Table VIII-2
(13)Facilities and equipment value per acre(Item 11)multiplied by the level-of-service(Item 12)divided by
1,000
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 96 Impact Fee Update Study
131
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Total Impact Cost per Resident
Table VIII-6 presents the total impact cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities in
Indian River County. Using the current achieved LOS, as previously presented in Table VIII-
2, the total cost for neighborhood/community parks in Indian River County is $61 per
resident and the total cost for regional parks is $809 per resident, for a total of $869 per
resident.
Table VIII-6
Total Impact Cost per Resident
ComponentPark Type
.. ... Total
Regional
Community
Total Land Value per Resident(') $27.00 $392.25 $419.25
Total Facility Value per Resident(2) 33.63 $416.36 449.99
Total Impact Cost per Resident(3) $60.63 $808.61 $869.24
(1) Source:Table VIII-4
(2) Source:Table VIII-5
(3) Sum of the land value per resident(Item 1)and the facility value per acre(Item 2)
Credit Component
To avoid overcharging new development for the capital cost of providing parks and
recreation services, a review of the capital financing program for the parks and recreation
program was completed. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential
revenues generated by new development, other than impact fees, which have been used
within the last five years or planned to be used over the next five years to fund the
expansion of capital facilities, land, and equipment related to Indian River County's parks
and recreation program. Based on this review, Indian River County's parks capital
expansion improvements are being funded primarily with sales tax revenues (96 percent of
total non-impact fee spending), and, at a lesser degree, with general fund and grant
revenues.
Capital Expansion Expenditures Credit
Between 2008 and 2017, Indian River County spent or planned to spend a total of $6.4
million for capital expansion of parks, resulting in an average annual capital expansion
expenditure of $639,000. Since the review of these expenditures spanned 2008 through
2017, the average annual capital expansion cost is divided by the average population for
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 97 Impact Fee Update Study
t 3�-
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
this same period. As presented in Table VIII-7, the average annual capital expansion
expenditure is approximately $7 per resident. As mentioned previously, a large part of this
funding (96 percent) is obtained from the optional sales tax, which will expire in 2019. This
analysis assumes that the sales tax will not be re-adopted. If the sales tax is re-adopted, the
credit calculations should be reviewed to determine if a revision is needed.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 98 Impact Fee Update Study
133
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table VIII-7
Historical and Programmed Capital Costs
rr �: rr: r• rr• r t r r [oilr
Sales Tax:
$1,512,092
Parks Maintenance Complex
-M$1,512,092Gifford Park Security House $146,084 $146,084
$1,000,000 $1,000,000
West County Regional Park
$50,0North County Soccer Lights
_ 4$1,843,M5
South County Regional Park Fence Project Ph.IISouth County Intergenerational Multi-Purpose Facility = - - = _ = 3 343 545Subtotal--Expenditures Funded with
SalesTax Revenues $146,084 $1,512,092 $1,050,000 $6,151,721
Subtotal--Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues(2)
$615,172
Average Annual Expenditures per Resident(Sales Tax)131
$6.31
General Fund Revenues&Grants:
$15,210
Gifford Park Football Fields
- $15,210 - - - - - - - -
$23,310
Irrigation of Football Fields(Gifford Park) $23,310 -
200 00 52DO.000
Oslo Boat Ramp&Parking - - -
" _ _ $200 000 _ _ $238,520
Subtotal--Expenditures Funded with General Fund&Grants $23,310 $15,210
$23,852
Subtotal--Average Annual Expenditures Funded with General Fund&Grants(4)
Average Annual Expenditures per Resident(General Fund&Grants)(')
Sales Tax and General Fund Revenues and Grants:
Total $169,394 $15,210 $1,512,092 $0 $0 $2,043,545 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $1,050,000 $6,390,241
$639,024
Average Annual Expenditures 161
97,443
Average Annual Population-Unincorporated County 17)
$6.56
Average Annual Expenditures per ResidentI'l
(1) Source:Indian River County
(2) Subtotal—expenditures funded with sales tax revenues divided by 10 years
(3) Subtotal—average annual expenditures funded with sales tax revenues(Item 2)divided by the average annual population(Item 7)
(4) Subtotal—expenditures funded with general funds&grants divided by 10 years
(5) Subtotal—average annual expenditures funded with general fund&grants(Item 4)divided by the average annual population(Item 7)
(6) Total parks&recreational facilities expenditures divided by 10 years
(7) Source:Appendix A,Table A-1;Unincorporated County
(8) Average annual expenditures(Item 6)divided by the average annual population(Item 7)
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc.
99 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
r
W
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Net Parks& Recreation Facilities Impact Cost
The net parks and recreation impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost
component and the credit component. Table VIII-8 summarizes the calculation of the net
parks and recreation cost per resident for both neighborhood/community and regional
parks.
The first section of Table VIII-8 identifies the total impact cost as $869 per resident for all
parks. The second section of the table identifies the revenue credits for the parks and
recreation impact fee,totaling approximately$34 for all parks.
The net impact cost per resident is the different between the total impact cost and the total
revenue credit per resident. This results in a net impact cost of $836 per resident for all
parks, which also reflects the relevant measure of LOS for impact fee calculation purposes.
Table VIII-8
Net Impact Cost per Resident
Revenue Credits
Calculation Step Impact
Cost Sales Tax General Fund Total
&Grants
Impact Cost
Total Impact Cost per Resident(') $869.24
Revenue Credit
Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(2) $6.31 $0.24
Capitalization Rate 2.5% 2.5%
Capitalization Period(in years) 5 25
Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(3) $29.32 $4.42 $33.74
Net Impact Cost
Net Impact Cost per Resident(4) $835.50
(1) Source:Table VIII-6
(2) Source:Table VIII-7
(3) Source:The present value of the capital improvement credit per resident(Item 2)at a discount rate of
2.5%with a capitalization period of 5 years for sales tax expenditures and 25 years for general fund&
grant expenditures.
(4) Total impact cost per resident(Item 1)less the total revenue credit per resident(Item 3)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 100 Impact Fee Update Study
(35
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Calculated Parks& Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
Table VIII-9 presents the calculated parks and recreation impact fee schedule developed for
residential land uses. As previously mentioned, only residential development within
unincorporated Indian River County is assessed a parks and recreation impact fee.
Table VIII-9
Calculated Parks& Recreation Impact Fee Schedule
impact Residents Net Cost per Total Current Percent
Land Use M (2) Impact Adopted Change(5)
unit per Unit Resident Fee(3) Fee(4)
Residential
Single Family(less than 1,000 sf) du 2.03 $835.50 $1,696 $1,302 30.3%
Single Family(1,000to 1,499 sf) du 2.19 $835.50 $1,830 $1,302 40.6%
Single Family(1,500to 2,499 sf) du 2.33 $835.50 $1,947 $1,463 33.1%
Single Family(2,500 sf or greater) du 2.59 $835.50 $2,164 $1,587 36.4%
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 1.33 $835.50 $1,111 $884 25.7%
Mobile Home/RV Park(tied down) du 1.30 $835.50 $1,086 $942 15.3%
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-3
(2) Source:Table VIII-8
(3) Residents per unit(Item 1)for each land use category multiplied by net cost per resident(Item 2)
(4) Source:Indian River County.Fees do not include the administrative fee
(5) Percent change from the current adopted rates(Item 4)to the calculated total impact fee rate(Item 3)
Affordable Growth Strategy
Based on a review of capital expansion expenditures between 2008 and 2017, the County
will use approximately $639,000 per year of non-impact fee funding over the next five years
and $24,000 per year afterwards. As mentioned previously, during the next 25 years, the
County is expected to grow at an annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure VIII-1 presents how
impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. The maximum
calculated fee is compared investment needed to maintain the current adopted LOS
standard. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of parks and recreation
impact fee calculated, the County needs approximately 92 percent of the maximum impact
fee revenues to maintain the current LOS. As mentioned previously, the available non-
impact fee consists primarily of sales tax revenues. These calculations assume that the sales
tax will not be re-adopted in 2019. If the sales tax is re-adopted, the Affordable Growth
calculations should be reviewed to see if a revision is necessary. In addition, the County is
targeting non-residential land uses for potential discounts and the parks and recreation fees
are charged only to residential land uses.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 101 Impact Fee Update Study
134
Indian River County � Impact Fee Update Study
Figure VIII-1
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee—Affordable Growth Strategy
- ------------ --------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
100%
80% ------ ----- �----o------------------------------------------Total Cost--------------
G 92/
60% ------------------------------------------------ MaximumlmpactFee -
� LOS Curve
f-
IRCAnnual
.Average Growth
0% — ,
0.00% L00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Annual Growth Rate
Table VIII-10 presents discounted impact fee schedule.
Table VIII-10
Calculated Parks&Recreation Impact Fee Schedule—Affordable Growth
. �.. -
�. •
.. � �.. - .
� ... .
Residential
Single Family(less than 1,OOOsf) du 92% $1,560 $1,302 19.8%
Single Family(1,OOOto 1,499sf) du 92% $1,684 $1,302 29.3%
Single Family(1,500 to 2,499 sf) du 92% $1,791 $1,463 22.4%
Single Family(2,500sf orgreater) du 92% $1,991 $1,587 25.5%
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 92% $1,022 $884 15.6%
Mobile Home/RV Park(tied down) du 92% $999 $942 6.1%
(1) Calculated based on an average annual spending of$639,000 for the next 5 years and$24,000 per year
afterwards,and an average annual growth rate of 1.4%over the next 25 years
(2) Total impact fee from Table VIII-9(Item 5)multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate(Item 1)
(3) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee
(4) Percent change from the current adopted rates(Item 3)to the calculated total impact fee rate(Item 2)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 102 Impact Fee Update Study
i37
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Staff Recommended Fee Rate
In the case of parks and recreation facilities impact fee, the County staff recommends
adopting the affordable growth fees with a 25-percent discount. This approach takes into
consideration the expected capital needs over the next several years and will be reviewed
during the next technical study update.
Table VIII-11
Calculated Parks &Recreation Impact Fee Schedule—Staff Recommended Fee Rates
Impact Staff Total Current Percent
Land Use Recommended Impact Adopted (4)
Unit
Adjustment(l) Fee(2) Fee(3) Change
Residential
Single Family(less than 1,OOOsf) du 75% $1,170 $1,302 -10.1%
Single Family(1,000 to 1,499 sf) du 75% $1,263 $1,302 -3.09/o
Single Family(1,500 to 2,499 sf) du 75% $1,343 $1,463 -8.2%
Single Family(2,500 sf or greater) du 75% $1,493 $1,587 -5.9%
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 75% $767 $884 -13.2%
Mobile Home/RV Park(tied down) du 1 75% $749 $942 -20.5%
(1) Source: Indian River County Staff recommends charging 75 percent of the affordable growth fee rates
(2) Total impact fee from Table VIII-10 multiplied by the staff recommended adjustment(Item 1)
(3) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee
(4) Percent change from the current adopted rates(Item 3)to the calculated total impact fee rate(Item 2)
Parks& Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's parks and recreation impact fee
program, a comparison impact fee schedules was completed for surrounding counties and
other jurisdictions throughout Florida. Table VIII-12 presents this comparison.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 103 Impact Fee Update Study
X38
Indian River County(Impact Fee update Study
Table VIII-12
Parks&Recreation Impact Fee Comparison
Indian River County
.r. St.Lucie Osceola
Land Use Unit(i) (2) Affordable Adopted County�6) Coun tyQ� Countyla) Countyl9) County"" County"') Coun tyI12) County(�3) County'14)
Calculated Growth 3 Staff") Fee") WOMm
Date of Last Update 2013 2013 2013 12005 2009 1 2006 1 2009 i2010 2010 2005 2006 2012 2011
Adoption Percentage 100°/ n/a n/a 100°/ 1009% 100°% I 100.9 1 50% 100% 10CM 100% I 100% 1 100%
Residential.
Single Family(2,OOOsf) du $1,947 1 $1,791 $1,343 $1,463 $1,533 $924 $718 $566 $3,133 $411 $757 $1,972 $472
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit 1,0OOsf $1,111 $1,022 $767 $884 $1,368 $679 $480 $425 $1,685 $311 $525 $1,972 $472
Mobile Home/RV Park(tied down) 1,000 sf $1,086 $999 $749 $942 $1,004 $677 $508 $5431 $2,393 $411 $4311 $1,972 $472
(1) du=dwelling unit
(2) Source:Table VIII-9
(3) Source:Table VIII-10
(4) Source:Table VIII-11;Indian River County recommends charging 75 percent of the affordable growth fee rates
(5) Source:Indian River County;Fees do not include the administrative fee
(6) Source:St.Lucie County Planning&Development Services Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing.
(7) Source:Osceola County Community Development Department
(8) Source:Charlotte County Community Development Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended.
(9) Source:Citrus County Planning&Development Department
(10)Source:Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department.Average of community and regional parks. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing.
(11)Source:Hernando County Planning&Development Department
(12)Source:Highlands County Code of Ordinances,Section 13-28. Impact fees moratorium in effect through June 30,2014.
(13)Source:Martin County Growth Management Department
(14)Source:St.Johns County Planning&Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 104 Impact Fee Update Study
W
"`Q
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
IX. Transportation
Indian River County's Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance was most recently updated in
2009 to assist the County in providing adequate transportation facilities for expected
growth. This section of the impact fee report provides the results of the transportation
impact fee analysis and consists of the following sections:
• Demand Component
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
• Affordable Growth Strategy
• Staff Recommended Fee Rate
• Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As in the case of other impact fee program areas, the methodology used for the
transportation impact fee study follows a consumption-based impact fee approach, in
which new development is charged based upon the proportion of vehicle-miles of travel
(VMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway
network.
Included in this document is the necessary support material used in the calculation of the
transportation impact fee. The general equation used to compute the impact fee for a
given land use is:
[Demand x Cost]—Credit=Fee
The demand for travel placed on the transportation system is expressed in units of VMT
(daily vehicle-trip generation rate times the trip length times the percent new trips [of total
trips]) for each land use contained in the impact fee schedule. The trip generation is
expressed in average daily rates since new development consumes trips on a daily basis.
The cost of building new capacity typically is expressed in units of dollars per vehicle mile or
lane mile of roadway capacity. The credit is an estimate of the future non-impact fee
revenues generated by new development that are allocated to transportation capacity
expansion construction projects. Thus, the impact fee is an "up front" payment for a
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 105 Impact Fee Update Study
1140
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
portion of the cost of building a lane mile of capacity directly related to the amount of
capacity consumed by each unit of land use contained in the impact fee schedule that is not
paid for by future tax revenues generated by new development.
It should be noted that the information used to develop the impact fee schedule was based
on the most recent, reliable, and localized data available. The following input variables
used in the fee equation:
Demand Variables:
• Trip generation rate
• Trip length
• Percent new trips
• Interstate and toll facility discount factor
Cost Variables:
• Cost per lane mile
• Capacity added per lane mile
Credit Variables:
• Equivalent gas tax credit (pennies)
• Present worth
• Fuel efficiency
• Effective days per year
A review of impact fee variables and corresponding recommendations are presented in the
following subsections.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 106 Impact Fee Update Study
l4 �
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Demand Component
Travel Demand
The amount of transportation system consumed by a unit of new land development is
calculated using the following variables and is measured in terms of the vehicle miles of
new travel a unit of development consumes on the existing road system.
• Number of daily trips generated;
• Average length of those trips; and
• Proportion of travel that is new travel, rather than travel that is already traveling on
the road system and is captured by new development.
As part of this update, the trip characteristics variables were obtained primarily from two
sources: (1) trip characteristics studies previously conducted throughout Florida by TOA
(Florida Studies Database), and (2) the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip
Generation report (9th edition).
The Florida Studies Database is included in Appendix B. This database was used to
determine VMT, which is developed from trip length, percent new trips, and trip rate for
most land uses in the fee schedule. The data in the trip characteristics database is based on
actual land use studies and was collected throughout Florida using machine traffic counts
and site specific land use origin-destination surveys. In addition, trip generation data from
the ITE 9th Edition Trip Generation report was used. In instances where trip generation was
available from the ITE Trip Generation report and the Florida Studies Database, a blended
average calculation was used to increase the sample size.
Interstate and Toll Facility Discount Factor
This variable is used to recognize that improvements to Interstate highways are funded by
the State using earmarked and Federal funds, while toll facility improvements are funded
with toll revenues. Typically, impact fees are not used to pay for these improvements, and
the portion of new development's travel occurring on the interstate/toll facility system
usually is eliminated from the total travel for each land use.
To calculate the interstate and toll (I/T) facility discount factor, the loaded highway network
file was generated for the Greater Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model v3.4
(GTCRPM). A select link analysis was run for all traffic analysis zones located within Indian
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 107 Impact Fee Update Study
►c}2
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
River County in order to differentiate trips with an origin and/or destination within the
county versus trips with no origin or destination within the county.
Currently, the only interstate/toll facilities in Indian River County are 1-95 and the Florida
Turnpike (SR 19). The limited access vehicle miles of travel (Limited Access VMT) for trips
with an origin and/or destination within Indian River County was calculated for the
identified limited access facilities. The total Indian River County VMT was calculated for all
trips with an origin and/or destination within Indian River County for all roads, including
limited access roads, located within Indian River County.
The I/T discount factor of 17.3 percent was determined by dividing the total Limited Access
VMT by the total Indian River County VMT. By applying this factor to the total Indian River
County VMT for each land use in the fee schedule, the reduced VMT is then representative
of only the roadways which are funded by impact fees. Appendix B, Table B-1 provides
further detail on this calculation.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 108 Impact Fee Update Study
I14
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Cost Component
The cost of providing roadway system capacity has decreased in recent years. Construction
costs increased significantly in Florida between 2005 and 2007 due to additional
construction demand caused by hurricanes, the housing market growth, and other factors.
Appreciation in land values also resulted in higher right-of-way (ROW) costs during the same
period. In early 2008, costs started to stabilize, and in recent years, communities have
experienced a decrease in construction costs, returning to levels seen before 2005. Cost
information from Indian River County, other Florida Counties, and the Florida Department
of Transportation (FDOT) was reviewed to develop a unit cost for all phases involved in the
construction of one lane-mile of roadway capacity. The following subsections summarize
the methodology and findings of the total unit cost analysis for county and state roads.
Appendix C provides the data and other support information utilized in these analyses.
County Roadway Costs
This section examines the right-of-way (ROW), construction, and other cost components
associated with county roads with respect to transportation capacity improvements in
Indian River County. For this purpose, recent bid data for ongoing projects provided by the
County and recent construction bid data from county roadway projects throughout Florida
were used to identify and provide supporting cost data for county improvements. The cost
for each roadway capacity project was separated into four phases: design,
construction/engineering inspection (CEI), ROW and construction.
Design and CEI
Design costs for county roads were estimated at 10 percent construction phase costs based
on a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout
Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C,Table C-10.
CEI costs for county roads were estimated at 9 percent of construction phase costs based on
a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout
Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C,Table C-16.
Right-of-Way
The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along a corridor that were necessary
to have sufficient cross-section width to widen an existing road or, in the case of new
construction, to build a new road. A review of recent ROW cost data for Indian River
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 109 Impact Fee Update Study
I`1`4
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
County identified 12 recent improvements with acquisition data. Using the construction
costs for these improvements, a ROW factor of construction was calculated for each
improvement, ranging from six (6) to 150 percent, with a weighted average of
approximately 41 percent. This calculated local factor was consistent with county road
ROW factors observed in recent impact fee studies throughout Florida and was used as the
basis for ROW costs in Indian River County. As seen in Table IX-1, this amount is equal to
approximately $0.66 million per lane mile for county roads. Additional detail is provided in
Appendix C,Tables C-4, C-5, C-11, and C-12.
Construction
The construction cost for county roads was based on a review of local and statewide
projects. A review of recent construction cost data for Indian River County identified 12
recent capacity expansion improvements throughout the County. Based on these
improvements, a weighted average cost of $1.80 million per lane mile was calculated for
use in the impact fee calculation (as seen in Table IX-1). This figure was compared to the
average construction cost per lane mile observed in other jurisdictions throughout the
state. These statewide projects averaged approximately $2.18 million per lane mile for
construction. Therefore, compared to the statewide data, local Indian River costs are
approximately 83 percent of the statewide average. Additional detail is provided in
Appendix C,Tables, C-6, C-7, C-13, and C-14.
Table IX-1
Estimated Total Cost per Lane Mile for County Roads
Cost per Lane Mile
Cost Phase Urban Rural Weighted
Design Design Average
Design(l) $180,000 $149,000 $159,000
Right-of-Way(2) $738,000 $613,000 $656,000
Construction(3) $1,800,000 $1,494,000 $1,598,000
CEI(4) $162,0001 $134,00 $143,0
Total Cost $2,880,0001 $2,390,0001 $2,556,000
(1) Source:Appendix C,Table C-2
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-4
(3) Source:Appendix C,Table C-6
(4) Source:Appendix C,Table C-8
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 110 Impact Fee Update Study
t y5
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
State Roadway Costs
This section examines the ROW, construction, and other cost components associated with
state roads with respect to transportation capacity improvements in Indian County. For this
purpose, recent bid data from state roadway projects throughout Florida and the FDOT's
Long Range Estimates (LRE) were used to identify and provide supporting cost data for state
improvements. The cost for each roadway capacity project was separated into four phases:
design, CEI, ROW and construction.
Design and CEI
Design costs for state roads were estimated at 9 percent construction phase costs based on
a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout
Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C,Table C-10.
CEI costs for state roads were estimated at 11 percent of construction phase costs based on
a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout
Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C,Table C-16.
Right-of-Way
Due to a lack of local right-of-way acquisition cost data for state roads in Indian River
County, a review of ROW costs from recent transportation fee studies throughout Florida
was conducted. Based on this review, ROW for state roadways was estimated at 44 percent
of the construction cost for state roads. As shown in Table IX-2, this amount is equal to
approximately $0.78 million per lane mile. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C,
Table C-12.
Construction
A review of recent state road capacity improvements in Indian River identified three
projects from 2008 and 2009 (SR 60 and SR 5 widening). These three projects averaged
approximately $2.95 million per lane mile for construction. However, due to the small
sample size, these projects were blended with 49 additional capacity expansion projects
throughout Florida, which resulted in a weighted average cost of $2.44 million per lane
mile. An analysis of county roadway improvements, where a larger sample of local projects
was available, in relation to statewide county road improvements, indicated that
construction costs average approximately 83 percent of construction costs statewide.
Based on this conclusion, the construction costs for state roadways in Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 111 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
were estimated at 83 percent of the state average of $2.44 million. Additional detail is
provided in Appendix C,Table C-15.
Table IX-2
Estimated Total Cost per Lane Mile for State Roads
Cost per Lane Mile
Cost Phase Urban Rural Weighted
Design Design Average$220,000 $183,000 $196,000
Right-of-Way(2) $880,000 $730,000 $781,000
Construction(3) $2,000,000 $1,660,000 $1,776,000
CEI(4) $220,000 $183,0001 $196,000
Total Cost $3,320,000 $2,756,000 $2,949,000
(1) Source:Appendix C,Table C-3
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-5
(3) Source:Appendix C,Table C-7
(4) Source:Appendix C,Table C-9
Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis)
The weighted average cost per lane mile for county and state roads is presented in Table X-
3. The resulting weighted average cost of approximately $2.59 million per lane mile was
utilized as the roadway cost input in the calculation of the transportation impact fee
schedule. The weighted average cost per lane mile includes county and state roads and is
based on weighting the lane miles of roadway improvements in the Long Range
Transportation Plan (LRTP).
Compared to the previous transportation impact fee update, the estimated cost of $2.59
million represents a slight increase in the unit cost per lane mile for roadway. The previous
cost, established in a 2004 Traffic Impact Fee Study, was estimated at $2.46 million. This
represents a five percent increase in the roadway unit cost per lane mile since the 2004
study.
Compared to recent transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida in the
past few years, the unit cost per lane mile estimated in this update study for Indian River
County is considerably lower. Recent unit costs have ranged from approximately $2.91
million to $4.44 million, with an average cost of $3.61 million. The lower costs in Indian
River County can be attributed to the lower construction costs observed in recent local bids
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 112 Impact Fee Update Study
147
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
as well as the mix of planned urban and rural designed roadways. Compared to other
jurisdictions, Indian River County plans to construct a greater proportion of rural designed
roadways, which are less expensive than roadways with urban design characteristics.
Table IX-3
Estimated Cost per Lane Mile
for County and State Roadway Projects in Indian River County
RoadsCost Phase County State County and
Roads(l) Roads(2) State
Design $159,000 $196,000 $162,000
Right-of-Way $656,000 $781,000 $667,000
Construction $1,598,000 $1,776,000 $1,614,000
CEI143 000196 000 $148,000
Total Cost $2,556,000 $2,949,000 $2,591,000
Lane Mile Distribution(4) 91% 9510 100.0
(1) Source:Table IX-1
(2) Source:Table IX-2
(3) Lane mile distribution (Item 4) multiplied by the design, ROW, construction, and
CEI phase costs by jurisdiction to develop a weighted average cost per lane mile
(4) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17, Items(a)and(b)
Capacity Added per Lane Mile
An additional component of the transportation impact fee equation is the capacity added
per lane mile (also known as the maximum service volume added per mile) of roadway
constructed. To calculate the vehicle miles of capacity (VMC) per lane mile of constructed
future roadway, an analysis of the 2035 projects (see Appendix C, Table C-17) was
conducted to reflect the mix of county and state road improvement that will be built in the
future. As shown in Table IX-4, the resulting average capacity per lane mile calculated
based on these projects is 8,255.
The updated capacity added per lane mile estimate of 8,255 is approximately three percent
less than the figure used in the 2004 Traffic Impact Fee Study. It should be noted that this
figure (8,499) was not changed as part of the 2009 update.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 113 Impact Fee Update Study
, y8
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table IX-4
Weighted Average Vehicle-Miles of Capacity per Lane Mile
Source Lane Mile Vehicle Miles of VIVIC Added per
Added(l) Capacity Added(2) Lane Mile(3)
County Roads 201.90 1,632,287 8,085
State Roads 19.00 191,352 10,071
Total 220.90 1,823,639
Weighted Average VMC Added per Lane Mile(4) 8,255
(1) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17
(3) Vehicle miles of capacity added(Item 2)divided by lane miles added(Item 1)
(4) Total vehicle miles of capacity added for county and state roads (Item 2) divided by the
total lane miles added(Item 1)
Cost per Vehicle-Mile of Capacity Added
The impact fee cost per unit of development is assessed based on the cost per vehicle-mile
of capacity. As shown in Tables IX-3 and IX-4, the cost and capacity for county roads have
been calculated based on typical roadway improvements. As shown in Table IX-5, the cost
per VMC for travel within IRC is approximately $314. This average cost per VMC figure is
used in the impact fee calculation to determine the total impact cost per unit of
development based on the vehicle-miles of travel consumed. For each vehicle-mile of travel
that is added to the road system, approximately$314 of roadway capacity is consumed.
Table IX-5
Weighted Average Cost per Vehicle-Mile of Capacity Added
Cost per Lane Average VIVIC (3)
Source (1) Added per Lane Cost per VIVIC
Mile mile(2)
County Roads $2,556,000 8,085 $316.14
State Roads $2,949,000 10,071 $292.82
Weighted Average $2,591,000 8,255 $313.87
(1) Source:Table IX-3
(2) Source:Table IX-4
(3) Cost per lane mile(Item 1)divided by average capacity added per lane mile(Item 2)
It is important to note that capacity projects eligible for impact fee funding include not only
new construction and lane additions, but also associated intersection improvements, traffic
signalization, and other amenities and technology improvements that allow for additional
vehicle capacity.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 114 Impact Fee Update Study
I�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Credit Component
Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit
The present value of the portion of non-impact fee revenues (converted to equivalent gasoline
taxes)generated by a new development over a 25-year period that is projected to be expended
on capacity expansion projects is credited against the cost of the system consumed by travel
associated with new development.
County
A review of the County's historical roadway financing program (FY 2008-2013) and the FY 2014-
2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) shows that all roadway projects are being funded by a
combination of fuel taxes, sales tax, grants, developer funds, and transportation impact fees.
Currently, capacity-adding projects in the county are primarily funded with fuel tax and sales tax
revenues. Based on the FY 2014-2017 CIP and discussions with County staff, it was assumed that
sales tax revenues will only be available to fund transportation capacity over the next five years,
and will not be a recurring revenue source. Therefore, only five years of sales tax revenues are
included in the credit calculations. If the sales tax is re-adopted in 2019 or a different revenue
source is allocated to the transportation capacity to replace the sales tax revenues, these credit
figures may need to be revised. As shown in Table IX-6,the sales tax portion of the county credit
was separated from the total county credit and all non-impact fee funding allocated to
transportation capacity was converted to equivalent gas tax revenues. A total gas tax equivalent
revenue credit of 11.1 pennies was given for sales tax revenues and 5.6 pennies was given for all
other revenue sources.
State
State expenditures on state roads were reviewed,and a credit for the capacity expansion portion
attributable to state projects was estimated. The equivalent number of pennies allocated to
fund state projects was determined from projects spanning a 10-year period (2009-2018). This
period represents past expenditures (from 2009 to 2013)from the FDOT Work Program and the
projected expenditures (from 2014 to 2018) from the current Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP). A list of capacity-adding roadway projects was developed, including lane
additions, new road construction, intersection improvements, interchanges, traffic signal
projects, and other capacity-addition projects. This review (summarized in Appendix D,Table D-
3) indicates that MOT spending generates an equivalent gas tax credit of 15.5 pennies of gas tax
revenue annually, which is within the range of what is observed in most other Florida
jurisdictions.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 115 Impact Fee Update Study
150
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
In summary, Indian River County contributes approximately 16.7 pennies toward roadway
capacity expansion projects,while the State spends an average of 15.5 pennies for state roadway
projects in Indian County. Therefore, a total of 32.2 pennies of credit are included in the impact
fee calculation to recognize the future capital revenue that is expected to be generated by new
development from all non-impact fee revenues,as shown in Table IX-6.
Table IX-6
Equivalent Pennies of Gas Tax Revenue
Equivalent
Credit Pennies per
Gallon
County Revenues(excluding sales tax)(') $0.056
County Revenues(sales tax ONLY)(2) $0.111
State Revenues(3) 0.155
Total $0.322
(1) Source:Appendix D,Table D-2
(2) Source:Appendix D,Table D-3(only accounts for 5 years of sales
tax revenues)
(3) Source:Appendix D,Table D-4
Present Worth Variables
Facility Life
The roadway facility life used in the impact fee analysis is 25 years, which represents the
reasonable life of a roadway.
Interest Rate
This is the discount rate at which gasoline tax revenues might be bonded. It is used to compute
the present value of the gasoline taxes generated by new development. The discount rate of 2.5
percent was used in the transportation impact fee calculation based on the estimate obtained
from Indian River County.
Fuel Efficiency
The fuel efficiency (i.e., the average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed) of the fleet of
motor vehicles was estimated using the quantity of gasoline consumed by travel associated with
a particular land use.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 116 Impact Fee Update Study
�S I
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Appendix D,Table D-8 documents the calculation of fuel efficiency value based on the following
equation, where "VMT" is vehicle miles of travel and "MPG" is fuel efficiency in terms of miles
per gallon.
Fuel E'{�i`cienc —YV1� T = �M�el�ic/eType
JJ .� RoadwayType MPq
ehicleType RoadwayType
The methodology uses non-interstate VMT and average fuel efficiency data for passenger
vehicles (i.e., passenger cars and other 2-axle, 4-tire vehicles, such as vans, pickups, and
SUVs) and large trucks (i.e., single-unit, 2-axle, 6-tire or more trucks and combination
trucks)to calculate the total gallons of fuel used by each of these vehicle types.
The combined total VMT for the vehicle types is then divided by the combined total gallons
of fuel consumed to calculate, in effect, a "weighted" fuel efficiency value that reflects the
existing fleet mix of traffic on non-interstate roadways. The VMT and average fuel
efficiency data were obtained from the most recent Federal Highway Administration's
Highway Statistics 2011. Based on the calculation completed in Appendix D, Table D-8, the
fuel efficiency rate to be used in the updated impact fee equation is 18.19 miles per gallon.
Effective Days per Year
An effective 365 days per year of operation was assumed for all land uses in the proposed fee.
However, this will not be the case for all land uses since some uses operate only on weekdays
(e.g., office buildings) and/or only seasonally (e.g., schools). The use of 365 days per year,
therefore, provides a conservative estimate,ensuring that gasoline taxes are adequately credited
against the fee.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 117 Impact Fee Update Study
r s'�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
The impact fee calculations for each land use are included in Appendix E, which includes the
major land use categories and the impact fees for the individual land uses contained in each
of the major categories. For each land use,Appendix E illustrates the following:
• Demand component variables (trip rate,trip length, and percent of new trips);
• Total impact fee cost;
• Annual gas tax credit;
• Present value of the gas tax credit;
• Net transportation impact fee;
• Current Indian River County impact fee; and
• Percent difference between the calculated impact fee and the 2009 adopted impact
fee.
It should be noted that the net impact fee illustrated in Appendix E is not necessarily a
recommended fee, but instead represents the technically defensible impact fee per unit of
land use that could be charged in Indian River County.
For clarification purposes, the calculation of an impact fee for one land use category is
presented. In the following example, the net impact fee is calculated for the single-family
residential detached land use category (ITE LUC 210) using information from the impact fee
schedule included in Appendix E, Table E-1. For each land use category, the following
equations are utilized to calculate the net impact fee:
Net Impact Fee=Total Impact Cost—Gas Tax Credit
Where:
Total Impact Cost = ([Trip Rate x Assessable Trip Length x % New Trips] / 2) x (1 —
Interstate/Toll Facility Disc. Factor) x (Cost per Vehicle-Mile of Capacity)
Gas Tax Credit = Present Value (Annual Gas Tax), given 2.5% interest rate & 25-year
facility life
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 118 Impact Fee Update Study
1s3
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Annual Gas/Sales Tax= ([Trip Rate x Total Trip Length x % New Trips] /2) x (Effective Days
per Year x$/Gallon to Capital)/Fuel Efficiency
Each of the inputs has been discussed previously in this document; however, for purposes
of this example, brief definitions for each input are provided in the following paragraphs,
along with the actual inputs used in the calculation of the fee for the single-family detached
residential land use (1,500-2,499 sf) category:
• Trip Rate=the average daily trip generation rate, in vehicle-trips/day(7.81).
• Assessable Trip Length = the actual average trip length for the category, in vehicle-miles
(6.62).
• Total Trip Length = the assessable trip length plus an adjustment factor of half a mile,
which is added to the trip length to account for the fact that gas taxes are collected for
travel on all roads including local roads(6.62+0.50=7.12).
• % New Trips = adjustment factor to account for trips that are already on the roadway
(100%).
• Divide by 2 = the total daily miles of travel generated by a particular category (i.e.,
rate*length*% new trips) is divided by two to prevent the double-counting of travel
generated between two land use codes since every trip has an origin and a destination.
• Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor = discount factor to account for the travel
demand occurring on interstate highways and/or toll facilities (17.3%).
• Cost per Lane Mile = unit cost to construct one lane mile of roadway, in $/lane-mile
($2,591,000).
• Average Capacity Added per Lane Mile = represents the average daily traffic on one
travel lane at capacity for one lane mile of roadway, in vehicles/lane-mile/day(8,255).
• Cost per Vehicle-Mile of Capacity= unit of vehicle-miles of capacity consumed per unit
of development. Cost per lane mile divided by average capacity added per lane mile
($2,591,000/8,255=$313.87).
• Present Value=calculation of the present value of a uniform series of cash flows,gas tax
payments in this case, given an interest rate, "i," and a number of periods, "n;"for 2.5%
interest and a 25-year facility life, the uniform series present worth factor is 18.4244.
For sales tax, which is available only for the next five years, the present worth factor is
4.6458.
• Effective Days per Year= 365 days.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 119 Impact Fee Update Study
7 q
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
• $/Gallon to Capital = the amount of gas tax revenue per gallon of fuel that is used for
capital improvements, in $/gallon ($0.211 for gas tax; $0.111 for sales tax).
• Fuel Efficiency=average fuel efficiency of vehicles, in vehicle-miles/gallon (18.19).
Transportation Impact Fee Calculation
Using these inputs, a net impact fee can be calculated for the single-family residential
detached land use (1,500-2,499 sf) category as follows:
Total Impact Cost=([7.81 * 6.62 * 1.0] /2) * (1-0.173) * ($313.87) =$6,710
Annual Sales Tax Credit= ([7.81 * 7.12 * 1.0]/2) * 365 * ($0.111/18.19) = $62
Sales Tax Credit=$62 * 4.6458=$288
Annual Credit for Gas Tax and Other Sources = ([7.81 * 7.12 * 1.0] /2) * 365 * ($0.211
/18.19)=$118
Gas Tax Credit=$118 * 18.4244=$2174
Total Credit=$288+$2,174=$2,462
Net Impact Fee=$6,710—$2,462=$4,248
A comparison of calculated fee schedule to the current adopted fee by land use is presented
in Table IX-7. The detailed fee schedule that includes the calculations shown above is
presented in Appendix E,Table E-1.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 120 Impact Fee Update Study
l�
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table IX-7
Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
Total Impact Total Total 2009Aclopted Percent
ITE LUC Land Use Unit cost", Credit(1) Impact Fee(2) Fee"' Change
RESIDENTIAL:
Single Family Detached
-Less than 1,000 sf du $4,966 $1,817 $3,149 $2,974 6%
210 1,000to1,499sf du $5,602 $2,048 $3,554 $2,974 20%
1,500 to 2,499 sf du $6,710 $2,462 $4,248 $4,483 -5%
2,500 sf or larger du $7,904 $2,900 $5,004 $5,031 -1%
220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du $4,369 $1,627 $2,742 $2,428 13%
240 Mobile Home/RV(tied down) du $2,490 $940 $1,550 $1,745 -11%
TRANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP:
310 Hotel room $3,410 $1,254 $2,156 $2,804 -23%
320 Motel room $2,442 $918 $1,524 $1,516 1%
620 Nursing Home bed $826 $332 $494 $432 14%
252 Assisted Care Living Facility(ACLF) bed $910 $355 $555 $620 -11%
OFFICE&FINANCIAL:
720
Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf $15,277V$55,675 $9,602 $13,411 -28%
MedicalOffice/Clinicgreaterthan10,000sf 1,OOOsf $22,258 $13,996 $13,411 4%
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,OOOsf $17,815 $10,511 $10,634 -1%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 1,OOOsf $23,401 $13,820 $13,020 6%
710 General Office 1,OOOsf $6,783 $4,257 $3,798 12%760 Research&Development Center 1,OOOsf $5,040 $3,164 $2,798 13%
INDUSTRIAL:
140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf $2,349 $876 $1,473 $1,318 12%
150 Warehousing 1,000 sf $2,189 $817 $1,372 $1,228 12%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf $796 $313 $483 $862 -44%
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse 1,000 sf $1,033 $378 $655 $1,228 n/a
110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf $4,286 $1,605 $2,681 $2,404 12%
n/a Concrete Plant acre $9,593 $3,587 $6,006 $5,382 12%
n/a ISand Mining acre $1,230 $461 $769 $690 11%
RETAIL:
820 Retail 1,000gsf $10,680 $4,320 $6,360 $3,163 101%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. $8,923 $3,841 $5,082 $5,587 -9%
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf $13,324 $5,030 $8,294 $10,108 -18%
932 Restaurant 1,000 sf $34,060 $13,417 $20,643 $22,152 -7%
934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $78,855 $33,391 $45,464 $34,781 31%
850 Supermarket 1,000 sf $15,628 $6,593 $9,035 $11,179 -19%
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf $10,632 $4,113 1 $6,5191 $7,830 -17%
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay $8,454 $3,545 $4,909 $14,589 -66%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf $42,534 $19,282 $23,252 $25,430 -9%
890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf $2,160 $793 $1,3671 $1,373 01%
RECREA71ONAL:
430 Golf Course hole $27,636 $10,121 $17,515 $11,248 560/
492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf $20,690 $7,723 $12,967 $10,824 200/0
412 County Park acre $1,361 $502 $859 $718 20%
491 Tennis Court court $24,315 $9,079 $15,236 $12,180 25%
420 Marina boat berth $2,289 $835 $1,454 $973 49%
GOVERNMENTAL:
732 Post Office 1,000 sf $25,310 $9,452 $15,858 $14,199 12%
590 Library 1,000 sf $41,072 $15,045 $26,027 $17,925 45%
733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf $17,169 $6,409 $10,760 $9,632 12%
571 Jail bed $3,382 $1,273 $2,109 $389 442%
MISCELLANEOUS:
565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf $13,825 $5,865 $7,960 $8,847 -10%
610 Hospital 1,000 sf $8,746 $3,195 $5,551 $5,309 5%
640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf $24,697 $9,226 $15,471 $3,511 341%
560 Church 1,000 sf $4,150 $1,586 $2,564 $2,588 -1%
444 Movie Theater w/Mati nee screen $27,036 $11,268 $15,768 $22,743 -31%
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) student $576 $212 $364 $149 144%
522 Middle School(Private,6-9) student $814 $313 $501 $1491 2361/.
530 High School(Private,9-12) student $859 $332 $527 $538 2%
540/550 University/Junior College(7,500 or fewer students) student $1,547 $562 $985 $653 51%
n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf $1,260 $539 $721 $983 27%
(1) Source:Appendix E,Table E-1
(2) Total impact cost less the total credit
(3) Source:Indian River County;fees do not include the administrative fee
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 121 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Affordable Growth Strategy
As presented in Table IX-6 and Appendix D, in addition to impact fees, the County will uses a
combination of gas tax, sales tax, and grant revenues to fund the transportation system. In
terms of affordable growth calculations, it is important to note the following:
• Consistent with the methodology used by many Florida jurisdictions, impact fee
calculations are based on the adopted LOS standard, which is lower than the
current achieved LOS. In other words, under the current methodology, even with
the full impact fee, unless the County uses other revenue sources, the current
achieved LOS for the system will deteriorate and more congestion will be
experienced. It is Indian River County's policy to conduct a link-by-link capacity
analysis and ensure that no link drops below LOS standard D. When the fee is
calculated using the current achieved LOS, it amounts to $12,700 for a mid-size
single family home, compared to $4,248 per home calculated using the adopted LOS
standard. As such, the standard methodology used for transportation impact fees
results in fee levels that slows down the degradation of the system, but does not
generate sufficient revenues to maintain the existing conditions when they are
better than the adopted LOS standard.
• As mentioned previously, the credit calculations assume that the local option sales
tax will not be re-adopted in 2019. In addition, the County had to defer
maintenance expenses since 2006 through the CIP period due to lack of funding for
capacity projects. Therefore, the available revenues for transportation capacity are
likely to decrease in the future. The Affordable Growth calculations are based on
this reduced funding and do not take into account funding from the State since the
County does not control the State budget. If the sales tax is re-adopted or other
revenue sources become available,these calculations will need to be revised.
• Although the medium population projections from the University of Florida, Bureau
of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) suggest an average growth rate of
approximately 1.4 percent through 2040, the high projections indicate almost a 2-
percent annual growth rate. To mitigate the uncertainty of growth rates and given
that even if adopted at 100 percent level, impact fees will not generate sufficient
revenues to maintain the current LOS and that the transportation system will
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 122 Impact Fee Update Study
157
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
continue to degrade, the high growth projection is used in the affordable growth
calculations for the transportation impact fee.
Based on this scenario, the County would need approximately 90 percent of the fee for all
land uses, as long as an additional funding of $10 million per year is available for the next
five years and $2.7 million per year afterwards, with an average annual population growth
rate of 2 percent. As presented in Figure IX-1, the red horizontal line represents the
maximum technically acceptable fee. Although the County may charge the maximum
amount of transportation impact fee calculated, if the estimated levels of non-impact fee
funding continue to be available, the County could adopt the impact fee at approximately
90 percent for all land uses and continue to maintain the adopted LOS standard.
Alternatively, if the County adopts the residential land uses at 100 percent, the fees for non-
residential land uses could be reduced by up to 55 percent (or adopted at 45 percent) to
maintain the adopted LOS standard. As mentioned previously, the level of discount is more
of a policy decision and could be at any level between the minimum levels calculated in this
section and 100 percent.
Figure IX-1
Transportation Impact Fee—Affordable Growth Strategy
Adopted LOS Standard
120% _._._-----
__ .-----
------ - -- ------- -- ----- -- ---------
100%
90% -�
80% --- ------ ----
0
60% ----- 8-... .__..
---------- ----- �Annual Growth �--------- -----_..-------—--------- ---
40% - ---- ------------- ----------------------------------..---_-------------------------•---------
Total Cost
20% — --- -.- Maximum Impact Fee
LOS Curve
0% -
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Annual Growth Rate
Table IX-8 presents discounted impact fee schedule.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 123 Impact Fee Update Study
15%
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table IX-8
Transportation Impact Fee Schedule-Affordable Growth Scenario
Affordable Total Net rr
ITE Luc Land Use Unit Growth Impact Adopted Percent
Adoption (2) (3) Change
Rate(l) ee Fee
RESIDENTIAL:
Single Family Detached
-Less than 1,000 sf du 100% $3,149 $2,974 6%
210 1,000 to 1,499sf du 100°/ $3,554 $2,974 20%
1,500 to 2,499sf du 100% $4,248 $4,483 -5%
2,500 sf or large r du 100°/ $5,004 $5,031 -1%
220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 100% $2,742 $2,428 13%
240 IMobile Home/RV(tied down) du 100°/ 1 $1,550 $1,745 -11%
3RANSIENT,ASSISTED,GROUP(Ado ' ):
310 Hotel room 45% $970 $2,804 -65%
320 Motel room 45% 1 $6861 $1,516 -55%
620 Nursing Home be 45% 1 $222 $432 -49%
252 Assisted Care Living Facility(ACLF) bed 1 45% 1 $250 $620 -60D/
OFFICE&FINANCIAL(A' ):
720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000sforless 1,000sf 45% $4,321 $13,411 -681/.
Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 45% $6,298 $13,411 -53%
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,000sf 45% $4,730 $10,634 -56%
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 1,0005f 45% $6,219 $13,020 -52%
710 General Office 1,0005f 45% $1,916 $3,798 -50%
760 Research&Development Center 1 1,000sf 1 45% 1 $1,424 $2,798 -491/
INDUSTRIAL(' lod):
140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 45% $663 $1,318 50%
150 Warehousing 1,000sf 45% $617 $1,228 -50%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000sf 45% $217 $862 -75%
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse* 1,000sf 45% $295 $1,228 -76%
110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 45% $1,206 $2,404 -501/
n/a Concrete Plant acre 45% $2,703 $5,382 -50%
n/a Sand Mining acre 45% $346 $690 -503/
RETAIL(Adapted):
820 Retail 1,000gsf 45% $2,862 $3,163 -10%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 45% $2,287 $5,587 -593/
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 45% $3,732 $10,108 -63%
932 Restaurant 1,000sf 45% $9,289 $22,152 -58%
934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thru 1,0005f 45% $20,459 $34,781 -41%
850 Supermarket 1,000sf 45% $4,066 $11,179 -641/6
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 45% $2,934 $7,830 -63%
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay 45% $2,209 $14,589 -85%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 45% $10,463 $25,430 59%
890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 45% $615 $1,373 55%
RECREATIONAL(Add ):
430 Golf Course hole 45% $7,882 $11,248 -303/
492 Racquet Club/Health Cl ub/Dance Studio 1,000sf 45% $5,835 $10,824 -469/
412 County Park acre 45% $387 $718 -461/.
491 Tennis Court court 45% $6,856 $12,180 -44%
420 Marina boat berth 45% $654 $973 -33%
GOVERNMENTAL(Ado ttd):
732 Post Office 1,000sf 1 45% 1 $7,1361 $14,199 -50%
590 Library 1,000sf 45% 1 $11,7121 $17,925 -35%
733 lGovernment Office Complex 1,000sf 45% 1 $4,8421 $9,632 -501/
571 IJail I bed 1 45% 1 $949 $389 144%
MISCELLANEOUS tied):
565 1 Day Care Center 1,000sf 45% $3,582 $8,847 -60%
610 Hospital 1,000sf 45% $2,498 $5,309 -53%
640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 45% $6,962 $3,511 98%
560 Church 1,000sf 45% $1,154 $2,588 -55%
444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 45% $7,096 $22,743 -693/
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) student 45% $164 $149 10%
522 Middle School(Private,6-9) student 45% $225 $149 51%
530 1 High School(Private,9-12) student 45% $237 $538 -561/.
540/550 University/Junior Col Iege(7,500orfewer students) student 45% $443 $653 -32%
n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 45% $324 $983 -67%
*All Non-Residential fees have been adopted,except the High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse land use
(1) Source:Calculated based on an average annual spending of$10 million for the next 5 years and$2.7 million per year afterwards,and an average annual
growth rate of 2.0%over the next 25 years
(2) Total net impact fee rates from Table IX-7 multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate(Item 1)
(3) Source:Indian River County;Fees shown do not include the administrative fee
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 124 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Staff Recommended Fee Rate
In the case of transportation impact fees, the County staff recommends implementing the
affordable growth fees.
Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in developing the Indian River County transportation impact fee
program, a comparison of calculated fees to transportation impact fee schedules adopted in
other jurisdictions was completed. Table IX-9 presents Indian River County's calculated
impact fee and a comparison to transportation impact fees in the surrounding and other
jurisdictions in Florida.
It should be noted that the differences in fee levels for a given land use can be caused by
several factors, including the year of the technical study, adoption percentage, study
methodology including variations in costs, credits and travel demand, land use categories
included in the fee schedule, etc.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 125 Impact Fee Update Study
14,0
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table IX-9
Transportation Impact Fee Comparison
Indian River County
rr• Brevard Okeechobee St.Lucie Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Highlands Martin St.Johns
Land Use Unit'" Calculated') Affordable Staff(" Adopted County(1) County17) County"' County�') County"" County"" County(12) County I I') County""
County(iq
Date of Last Update 77 2013 2013 2013 2009 2000 1 2012 1 2009 2009 2010 2010 2013 2006 120121 2011
Adoption Percentage 100°/ n/a n/a 100•/ 100•/ 100°/ 100°/ 100°/ 50% 100% 44% 100% 100% 100°/
Residential.
Single Family(2,000sf) du S4,2491 $4,248 $4,2481 $4,483 $4,353 $9631 $4,2351 $6,7111 $1,9851 $5,7531 $2,5371 $6,5941 $2,815
$4,408
Non-Residential:
Light Industrial 1,000sf $2,681 $1,206 $1,206 $2,404 n/a $473 $390 $4,904 $628 $4,333 $1,611 $4,663 $1,857 $1,522
Office(50,000sgft) 1,DOOsf $4,257 $1,916 $1,916 $3,798 $5,058 $1,091 $1,287 $2,601 $1,803 $9,291g$34,795
031 $12,380 $2,198 $2,132
RetaiI(100,ODOsgft) 1,000sf $6,360 $2,862 $2,862 $3,163 $S,270 $1,194 $2,503 $9,717 $1,487 $10,980769 $9,821 $5,183
$3,777
Bankw/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $13,820 $6,219 $6,219 $13,020 $23,331 $1,194 $2,503 $19,222 $1,487 $21,954514 $44,926 $6,841 $9,501
Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,DOOsf $45,464 $20,459 $20,459 $34,781 $35,791 $2,829 $2,503 $15,967 $1,487 $74,793 $100,808 $15,693
$9,086
(1) Du=dwelling unit
(2) Source:Table IX-7
(3) Source:Table IX-8
(4) Source:Table IX-8;Indian River County Staff recommends charging the affordable growth fee rates
(5) Source:Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee
(6) Source:Brevard County Planning&Development Department.Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through March 2014
(7) Source:Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners Administration Department
(8) Source:St.Lucie County Ordinance Planning&Development Services Department;Average of four impact fee districts
(9) Source:Charlotte County Community Development Department;Average of three impact fee districts
(10)Source:Citrus County Planning&Development Department
(11)Source:Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department
(12)Source:Hernando County Planning&Development Department;Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through August 2014
(13)Source:Highlands County Code of Ordinances,Section 13-28;Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through June 2014
(14)Source:Martin County Growth Management Department
(15)Source:St.Johns County Planning&Zoning Department
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 126 Impact Fee Update Study
6
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
X. Educational Facilities
Educational facilities impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of
land, facilities and capital equipment required to support the additional school facilities
demand created by new growth. This section presents the results of the educational
facilities impact fee update study for Indian River County and will serve as the technical
support document for the calculated school impact fee schedule.
There are several major elements associated with the development of the educational
facilities impact fee. These include:
• Facility Inventory
• Service Area and Enrollment
• Facility Service Delivery
• Cost Component
• Credit Component
• Net Impact Cost per Student
• Student Generation Rate
• Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
• Affordable Growth Strategy
• Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
Facility Inventory
The Indian River County School District provides public education facilities that are available
to all school-age residents of Indian River County. As such, this analysis will consider all
public elementary, middle, and high school level facilities and the students attending these
facilities located throughout and living within Indian River County.
The District currently operates 19 traditional public schools that serve the students of Indian
River County and its municipalities, including 13 elementary schools, 4 middle schools, and
2 high schools. The District's current traditional school inventory (excluding charter,
alternative or adult education) is provided in Appendix G,Table G-1.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 127 Impact Fee Update Study
� 4Z
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Service Area and Enrollment
The Indian River County School District provides public education facilities that are available
to all Pre-Kindergarten thru 12th grade (PK-12) students throughout the entire county.
Attendance boundaries can be redrawn to balance school enrollment with available school
capacity and therefore can serve different geographic areas over time. As such, the
appropriate impact fee district for public schools is countywide.
Table X-1 presents the historical student enrollment since 2000-01 school year and
projected enrollment through 2023-24. The annual percent change for the enrollment is
presented, as well as a three-year average to account for any random fluctuations. Table X-
1 reflects that student enrollment is expected to decline slightly over the next two years,
and then stabilize and start increasing as of 2016-17 school year.
Table X-1
Indian River County Enrollment
School
Year Change(2) Average(3)
2000-01 15,477 -
2001-02 14,467 -6.5%
2002-03 14,917 3.1%
2003-04 15,412 3.3%
2004-05 15,604 1.2% 2.6%
2005-06 15,901 1.9% 2.2%
2006-07 16,273 2.3% 1.8%
2007-08 16,365 0.6% 1.6%
2008-09 15,794 -3.5% -0.2%
2009-10 15,710 -0.5% -1.2%
2010-11 15,549 -1.00/0 -1.7%
2011-12 15,597 0.3% -0.4%
2012-13 15,541 -0.4% -0.4%
2013-14 15,424 -0.8% -0.3%
2014-15 15,303 -0.8% -0.6%
2015-16 15,245 -0.49/o -0.6%
2016-17 15,294 0.3% -0.3%
2017-18 15,307 0.1% 0.0%
2018-19 15,425 0.8% 0.4%
2019-20 15,607 1.2% 0.7%
2020-21 15,859 1.6% 1.2%
2021-22 16,168 1.9% 1.6%
2022-23 16,547 2.3% 1.9%
2023-24 16,990 2.7% 2.3%
(1) Source: Indian River County School District and Florida
Department of Education
(2) Percent change from one year to the next
(3) Average change over the last three years
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 128 Impact Fee Update Study
) `3
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Facility Service Delivery
The Indian River County School District inventory was reviewed and trends in the net square
feet per student stations were evaluated. This review along with discussions with the
District representatives suggested that the design characteristics of future facilities are
likely to be consistent with the existing schools.
Table X-2 illustrates the facility service delivery in Indian River County, which is 144.7 net
square feet per permanent student station for elementary schools, 140.5 net square feet
per permanent student station for middle schools, and 157.9 net square feet per
permanent student station for high schools. The weighted average facility service delivery
based on all three school types is 147.7 net square feet per permanent student station.
Reference to net square feet pertains to the most recent figures published per the Florida
Inventory of School Houses(FISH) Report for the District.
Table X-2
Facility Service Delivery
Description SchoolType Total/
MiddleElementary
Permanent Net Square Footage(l) 1,122,7101 602,5781 826,7291 2,552,017
Permanent Student Stations(2) 7,761 4,288 5,235 17,284
Net Square Feet per Student Station(3) 144.7 140.5 157.9 147.7
(1) Source: Indian River County School District
(2) Source: Indian River County School District. Indicates permanent capacity after FISH adjustment.
(3) Permanent net square footage(Item 1)divided by permanent student stations(Item 2)
The service delivery is based on the permanent student stations because it is the School
District's policy to remove portable stations and use them only as a temporary solution.
This approach is also consistent with the methodology used in the 2005 technical study,
which is the basis of the current adopted impact fee schedule. Portable stations will always
be used at some level since they provide valuable flexibility to address temporary increases
in enrollment. The School District's policy is to provide the necessary permanent student
stations in the long term.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 129 Impact Fee Update Study
14�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Cost Component
The capital costs of providing educational facilities includes three components, including the
school facility cost, transportation cost, and ancillary facility costs. This section addresses
each of these components.
FacilitV Cost per Student Station
The first step in determining the cost of providing public schools to Indian River County
residents is to calculate the facility cost per student station. Several cost components must
be considered when calculating the total cost of constructing a school, including
architectural/civil design/site improvement costs; construction costs; furniture,fixtures, and
equipment (FF&E) costs; and the cost to purchase the land. Each component of the school
facility cost is described in more detail in the following subsections.
Architectural/Civil Design/Site Improvement, Construction and FF&E Costs
To determine the administration, architect/civil design/site improvement, construction, and
FF&E costs associated with building a new school in Indian River County, cost information
was obtained for new schools built or proposed in Indian River County. The most recent
construction included Storm Grove Middle School (opened in 2009), and renovation and
expansion of the Vero Beach Elementary School (opened in 2012). In addition to these
schools, insurance values of the existing schools and estimates included in the Educational
Plant Survey for upcoming school expansions were reviewed and supplemented with
discussions with the District's representatives. Given the recent fluctuations in construction
costs and the limited number of schools built in the County over the past few years, a
review of schools that were built over the past five years throughout the State was
conducted. This database included approximately 135 schools. Of these, approximately 20
were built in 2011. Based on this information, a construction cost of $145 per net square
foot was used in the study for elementary schools, $175 per net square foot for middle
schools, and $185 per net square foot for high schools, with a weighted average
construction cost of $165 per net square foot for all school levels. Appendix A provides
additional information on cost estimates.
The architectural, civil design, site preparation (including on-site improvement and traffic
control costs), and FF&E costs (including technology) are calculated based on the ratio of
these costs to the construction costs observed in Indian River County and other
jurisdictions. These figures were also discussed with the District representatives and are
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 130 Impact Fee Update Study
I
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
estimated at 10 percent of construction for architectural/civil design costs, 10 percent for
site preparation costs, and 7 percent for FF&E costs.
Table X-3 presents the cost per square foot figures for the architectural/civil design/site
improvement, construction, and FF&E cost components for each school type. Table X-3 also
presents the weighted average figure for each cost component, based on all three school
types.
Land Cost
For each school type, the land cost per square foot is based on a value of$50,000 per acre.
This cost per acre is based on the current value of land owned by the District as well as
additional analysis. This additional analysis included a countywide review of vacant land
sales over the last three years and market values of all vacant land of parcels similar in size
to the District's school sites. The results of the vacant land analysis confirm that the cost
per acre used in the impact fee analysis is reasonable. Appendix G documents the results of
the land value analysis.
The land cost per square foot by school type was developed based on the acres per 1,000
permanent net square feet needed for the future schools. The resulting land cost figures
for each type of school also are presented in Table X-3.
Net Interest Cost
When a School District issues Certificates of Participation (COP) or other types of bonds to
fund additional capacity, interest costs incurred during the construction period need to be
added to the school facility construction costs. The Indian River County School District has
been using COPs to fund a portion of its expansion projects; however, to provide a
conservative estimate,this cost is not included in the calculation.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 131 Impact Fee Update Study
I ee
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table X-3
Facility Cost per Student Station
MiddleCost Component Elementary
School . . School
Net Square Feet per Student Station(l) 144.71 140.51 157.91 147.7
School Facility Cost Components:
Architectural/Civil Design/Site Improvement
Cost per Net Sq Ft(2) $29.00 $35.00 $37.00 $33.01
Construction Cost per Net Sq Ft(3) $145.00 $175.00 $185.00 $165.04
FF&E Cost per Net Sq Ft(4) $10.15 $12.25 $12.95 $11.55
Land Cost per Net Sq Ft(5) $11.60 $13.30 $14.50 $12.40
Total Facility Cost per Net Sq Ft(6) $195.75 $235.55 $249.45 $222.00
Total Facility Cost per Student Station(7) $28,3251 $33,0951 $39,388 $32,789
(1) Source:Table X-2
(2) Estimated at 20% of the construction cost based on estimates obtained from the Indian River County School District and recent
cost obtained from other Florida School Districts. Detailed information on cost estimates is included in Appendix G.
(3) Construction cost is estimated to range from$145 per net square foot to$185 per net square foot,based on information obtained
from the Indian River County School District and recently constructed schools in other Florida jurisdictions. Detailed information
on cost estimates is included in Appendix G.
(4) Estimated at 7%of the construction cost based on estimates obtained from the Indian River County School District and recent cost
obtained from other Florida School Districts. Detailed information on cost estimates is included in Appendix G.
(5) The land cost per square foot for each school type is based on the acreage per 1,000 permanent square feet for future schools
at a cost of$50,000 per acre. This cost per acre figure is based on the land value of current schools within the county and average
land values for vacant land throughout the county. Further information is included in Appendix G.
(6) Sum of the school facility cost per net square foot(Items 2 thru 5)
(7) The net square feet per permanent student station (Item 1) multiplied by the total school facility cost per net square foot(Item 6)
for each respective school type.
J Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 132 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Total Facility Cost per Student
The total facility impact cost per student for each school type is based on the facility cost
per student station figures derived in Table X-3, and is typically calculated by dividing the
cost per student station by the ratio of current student enrollment to available capacity.
The adjustment of multiplying the cost per student station by the ratio of current student
enrollment to available capacity converts the cost per student station to a cost per student.
In addition, this calculation accounts for the current available permanent capacity and
adjusts the costs accordingly. If there is available capacity (e.g., currently more permanent
student stations than students), then the total facility cost per student increases because
the cost of building this additional capacity is being recouped. Similarly, if there are
currently more students enrolled than available capacity, the cost per student is adjusted
downward.
In the case of Indian River County, although there is available capacity countywide, because
the District's adopted LOS standard is 100 percent, the cost per student station calculated in
Table X-3 also represents the facility cost per student. This is also appropriate because part
of the available capacity is used for the Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten (VPK) students and
allows for the space needed for special needs students and their aids, and therefore, is not
available for additional students.
Table X-4
Facility Cost per Student
MiddleElementary
TotalCalculation Step School School School Average
Facility Impact Cast per Student
Facility Cost per Student Station(l) $28,325 $33,095 $39,388 $32,789
Adopted LOS Standard(2) 1009/0 1000/0 1000/0 100%
Total Facility Impact Cost per Student(3) $28,325 $33,095 $39,388 $32,789
(1) Source: Table X-3
(2) Source: Indian River County School District
(3) Facility cost per student stations(Item 1)multiplied by the adopted LOS standard(Item 2)
Although the School District's adopted LOS standard is measured in terms of stations to
enrollment ratio for planning purposes, for impact fee purposes, the level of service is
shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per student, which
reflects the capacity investment made by the School District for schools and other related
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 133 Impact Fee Update Study
I��
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
capital assets. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net cost per student,
which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes.
Total Cost per Student
In addition to the facility cost per student calculated in Table X-4, the total facility cost per
student includes two additional cost components: the capital costs associated with
providing transportation services and ancillary facilities. Both of these cost components are
calculated on a per-student basis and are not dependent on school type. Each of these
additional cost components is discussed in the following paragraphs.
Transportation Costs
The first additional capital cost component is the cost of providing transportation services
to students. The District currently owns 111 buses used for student transportation. Of
these, approximately 10 percent are equipped for handicapped students at a cost of
approximately $111,000 per bus. The cost for the remaining buses is estimated at $98,000
per bus, which is consistent with bus costs observed in other school districts. The result is a
total transportation capital value of $11 million. The total value of the transportation fleet
is divided by the District's enrollment for schools included in Appendix G, Table G-1, as well
as the District's alternative school students, as this is the total existing student population
benefiting from services provided by the District's transportation fleet. The result is a cost
of$709 per student for transportation services, as presented in Table X-5.
Ancillary Facilities Costs
The other additional capital cost component is for the ancillary facilities that are necessary
for the District to provide support services for students, schools, transportation services,
and administrative personnel. The District currently has approximately 85,000 net square
feet of permanent ancillary facilities for transportation, maintenance, warehouse, and
administrative functions. Leased facilities are not included in this square footage. Current
value of each existing ancillary facility depends on the type of facility and was provided by
District staff, with the weighted average value of approximately $185 per square foot. This
figure is consistent with costs of similar buildings observed in other jurisdictions throughout
Florida.
In terms of land, the only ancillary facility that is not located on a school property is the
Transportation Building, which is located on a 6-acre parcel, valued at $155,000 according
to the Property Appraiser's database. This figure is used for the additional land value for
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 134 Impact Fee Update Study
IVq
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
ancillary facilities since the acreage associated with facilities that are located on school
parcels is already accounted for as part of the school acreage.
The ancillary facility cost per student is based on the existing inventory, which is valued at
$15.8 million, including $15.7 million for buildings and $0.2 million for land. Based on the
current enrollment, the result is a cost of $1,020 per student for ancillary facilities, as
presented in Table X-5. Similar to transportation cost, the ancillary facility value is divided
by the enrollment to the traditional and alternative schools to account for any
administrative support provided to alternative school students at these facilities.
Table X-5
Transportation Services and Ancillary Facility Cost per Student
Description
Transportation Servicestost per Student
Total Current Value of Transportation Services(l) $11,021,000
Current Enrollment(2) 15,541
Total Transportation Services Cost per Student(3) $709
Ancillary Facility Cost per Student
Building Value for Ancillary Facilities(4) $15,691,885
Land Value for Ancillary Facilities lsl155 000
Total Current Value for Ancillary Facilities(6) $15,846,885
Total Ancillary Facility Cost per Student(') $1,020
(1) Source: Indian River County School District
(2) Source: District enrollment from Table X-1(which includes students from
the schools listed in Appendix G, Table G-1) plus alternative school
students. The total value of the District's transportation fleet is divided
by this larger enrollment figure to account for the total student
population that benefits from services provided by the District's
transportation fleet.
(3) Total value of transportation services (Item 1) divided by the current
enrollment(Item 2)
(4) Source: Indian River County School District
(5) Land value for the Transportation Building. All other facilities are
located on school sites.
(6) Sum of the building value (Item 4) and land value (Item 5) of the
District's current inventory of ancillary facilities.
(7) Total value for ancillary facilities (Item 6) divided by the current
enrollment(Item 2)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 135 Impact Fee Update Study
70
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Credit Component
To ensure that new development is not being overcharged for construction of future student
stations, any non-impact fee revenue that will be generated by new development and that will
be used towards the capital expansion of school facilities must be included as a credit to reduce
the total cost per student. It is important to note that a credit for educational facilities impact
fees is not given for revenue generated by new development that is used for capital renovation
of existing schools that does not add capacity or for maintenance or operational costs.
Based on a review of the District's capacity addition expenditures over the past five years
and planned expenditures over the next five years, it has been determined that revenue
credits will be calculated for cash expenditures as well as debt service funding.
Capital Improvement Credit
The Florida Statutes authorizes several sources of revenue for school districts, such as Public
Education Capital Outlay (PECO) and Capital Outlay & Debt Service (CO & DS) that can be
used for the construction of capital facilities. With regard to state revenue, the District has
used both PECO and CO & DS revenue sources as well as Classroom for Kids revenue over
the past five years for the construction of additional permanent capacity. In addition, a
portion of the local capital ad valorem tax was also used toward the construction and is
programmed to be used for the upcoming expansion of Citrus Elementary School.
The capital improvement revenue credit per student is calculated by dividing the total
amount of capital revenue by the average enrollment during this ten-year period. As
presented in Table X-6, the resulting capital improvement revenue available for the capital
expansion of public schools in Indian River County $186 per student per year or $3,427 per
student over the next 25 years, for non-impact fee funding.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 136 Impact Fee Update Study
171
Indian River County(Impact Fee update Study
Table X-6
Revenue Credit
Project 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
CO&'DS/PECO(l):
Dodgertown Elementary--Addition of Cafeteria _ _ _ 1 167 649
Subtotal-State Revenues $0 $1,167,6491 $1,167,649
1.5-Mit Local Capital Tax(1):
Sebastian River High School--Addition of ROTC Facility $1,079,156 - $1,079,156
Storm Grove Middle School--New School $453,668 $453,668
Dodgertown Elementary--Addition of Cafeteria - $191,023 $191,023
Support Services Complex--New Building $3,160,329 $3,160,329
Treasure Coast Elementary Expansion $3,157,055 $3,157,055
Citrus Elementary Expansion $3,000,000 $2,300,000 $5,300,000
Sebastian River High School--Freshman Learning Ctr Classroom Bldg $3,321,009 - _ _ = $3,321,0091
Subtotal-1.5-Mil Local $1,079,156 $453,668 $0 $191,023 $6,481,3381 $0 $3,157,055 00,00
$3,000,000 $2,30 $16,662,240
Classroom for Kids/Other('):
Storm Grove Middle School--New School $8,315,310 $8,315,310
Dodgertown Elementary--Addition of Cafeteria $1,974,793 - $1,974,793
Support Services Complex--New Building $198,821 $198,821
Sebastian River High School--Freshman Learning Ctr Classroom Bldg = = 662 850 662 850
Subtotal-Classroom for Kids/Other $8,315,310 $1,974,793 $861,671 $11,151,774
Total Expenditures $1,079,1561 $8,768,9781 $0 $3,333,4651 $7,343,009 $3,000,01DO1 $2,300,000 $28,981,663
Average Annual Expenditures(z) $2,898,166
Average Enrollment(') 15,582
Revenue Credit perStudent(9) $186
Capitalization Rate(5) 2.5%
Capitalization Period,Years(6) 25
Present Value of Capital Improvement Revenue Credit per5tudent(7) $3,427
(1) Source:Indian River County School District
(2) Total expenditures divided by 10 years to calculate the average annual expenditures
(3) Source:Table X-1
(4) Average annual expenditures(Item 2)divided by the average enrollment(Item 3)
(5) Interest rate the District is likely to pay for future bonds,estimated based on discussions with the District and County representatives
(6) Time period after which major repairs are needed
(7) Present value of revenue credit per student(Item 4)at 2.5%interest rate(Item 5)over a 25-year capitalization period(Item 6)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 137 Impact Fee Update Study
N
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Debt Service Credit per Student
The District has been using COPS and other types of bonds to pay for a portion of the
capacity expansion projects. Given that there is still an outstanding debt service on these, a
credit is calculated for future debt service payments related to capacity expansion projects.
In cases where the distribution of bond funding for capacity expansion versus
replacement/renovation projects was not available, it was assumed that the entire amount
was used for capacity expansion projects, which results in a generous credit and a
conservative impact fee. The District uses local capital outlay millage and federal subsidies
to pay the debt service.
A revenue credit is calculated for the remaining portion of each outstanding COP/bond
issue used to fund capacity expansion projects. The remaining payments were brought back
to present value, based on the remaining number of years and annual interest rate of each
respective issue.
As presented in Table X-7,the debt service credit is$6,977 per student.
Table X-7
Debt Service Credit per Student
Number of Remaining Present Value Average DebtService
Yearsof of Total
Description ..
Payments(l) for
Certificates of Participation
2005 COPS Issue 12 $75,408,441 $57,465,002 15,861 $3,623
2007 COPS Issue 14 $55,753,771 $38,059,999 16,083 $2,366
2005 COBI 14 $1,373,338 $970,000 16,083 $60
2008 COBI 11 $5,450,594 $4,305,000 15,900 $271
2010 COBI 16 $194,3501 $139,9991 16,457 $9
2010 QSCB Issue 15 $16,259,2361 $10,589,7691 16,352 $648
Total COPs Debt Service Credit per Student $6,977
(1),(2)Source:Indian River County School District
(3) Present value of the total remaining payments due, based on the interest rate of each payment and the
number of years of remaining payments.
(4) Source:Table X-1. Enrollment for 2017 through 2025 is based on projections obtained from the Florida
Department of Education,and afterwards based on a 1%annual growth.
(5) Present value of total remaining payments(Item 3)divided by the average annual enrollment over the life
of the remaining payments(Item 4)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 138 Impact Fee Update Study
173
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Net Impact Cost per Student
The net impact fee per student is the difference between the cost component and the
credit component. Table X-8 summarizes the three-step process used to calculate the net
impact cost per student for public schools in Indian River County.
First, the total impact cost per student is determined. This is the sum of the weighted
average facility impact cost per student from Table X-4 and the transportation and ancillary
facility cost components per student from Table X-5.
Second, the total revenue credit is determined. This is the sum of the capital improvement
revenue credit per student from Table X-6 and the debt service revenue credit per student
from Table X-7.
Third, the net impact cost per student is determined, which is the difference between the
total impact cost per student and total revenue credit per student. The resulting figure of
$24,114 per student is also the relevant measure of LOS for impact fee calculation
purposes.
Table X-8
Net Impact Cost per Student
Total Impact Cost PerStudena
Facility Impact Cost(i) $32,789
Transportation Impact Cost(2) $709
Ancillary Facility Cost l3i1 020
Total Impact Cost per Student(4) $34,518
Revenue Credit Per Stude4
Capital Improvement Credit(5) $3,427
Debt Service Credit(6) $6,97
Total Revenue Credit per Student(7) $10,404
Net Impact Cost Per Studena
Net Impact Cost per Student' $24,114
(1) Source:Table X-4
(2) Source:Table X-5
(3) Source:Table X-5
(4) Sum of the facility impact cost(Item 1),the transportation
impact cost(Item 2),and the ancillary facility cost(Item 3)
(5) Source:Table X-6
(6) Source:Table X-7
(7) Sum of the capital improvement credit(Item 5)and the
debt service credit(Item 6)
(8) Total impact cost per student(Item 4)less total revenue
credit per student(Item 7)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 139 Impact Fee Update Study
► 7-4
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Student Generation Rate
The number of students living in a household typically varies depending on the type of
residential housing. Therefore, school impact fees are typically assessed based on the
specific student generation rates for different types of residential land uses.
Indian River County's current school impact fee developed the student generation rates
using Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) and Census 2000 data. This impact fee study
employs a new methodology using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to develop the
student generation rate for Indian River County. Specifically, GIS was used to link student
addresses to parcels in the Indian River County Property Appraiser's database in order to
generate the number of students per unit by school type and land use based on the latest
tax roll.
Indian River County School District and Indian River County worked together to provide a
geocoded student addresses. This file was then linked to the addresses of students who
attend those schools listed in Appendix G, Table G-1. Results of this analysis are provided in
Table X-9.
Table X-9
Student Generation Rates
Total
Residential Land Use Housing Numberof Students
units(l) Students(2) per Unit(3)
Traditional Schools
Single Family 51,423 12,979 0.252
Multi-Family 17,277 1,712 0.099
Mobile Home 4,836 733 0.152
Total/Weighted Average 1 73,5361 15,4241 0.210
(1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser for single family/multi-
family homes and the American Census Survey,2012 Estimates,for
mobile homes
(2) Source: Indian River County School District and Indian River County
(3) Number of students(Item 2)divided by the number of units(Item 1)for
each residential land use type.
As presented, student generation rates are calculated at 0.252 students per home for single
family homes, 0.099 students for multi-family units, and 0.152 students for mobile homes,
for a weighted average of 0.210 students per home.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 140 Impact Fee Update Study
173-
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
To determine the calculated school impact fee for each residential land use under each fee
schedule scenario, the net impact cost per student is multiplied by the student generation
rate. The resulting impact fee levels are presented in Table X-10.
Table X-10
Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
ImpactStudents Net Impact Total
Land Use Unit (1) Cost per (3) Adopted (5)
per Unit Student(2) Fee Fee(4) Change
Residential:
Single Family du 0.252 $24,114 $6,077 $1,756 246%
Multi-Family du 0.099 $24,114 $2,387 $500 377%
Mobile Home du 0.152 $24,114 $3,665 $623 488%
(1) Source:Table X-9
(2) Source:Table X-8
(3) Students per unit(Item 1)multiplied by the net impact cost per student(Item 2)
(4) Source: Indian River County Planning Division
(5) Percent change from the current adopted fee(Item 6)to the total impact fee(Item 5)
Affordable Growth Strategy
Based on the data shown in Tables X-6 and X-7, the School District uses approximately $3
million per year of non-impact fee funding for school capacity projects and $12 million per
year to pay off the debt service,for a total of$15 million per year. During the next 25 years,
Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure X-1
presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As
shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum legally acceptable fee. This level is
compared investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Given that the available non-
impact fee funding, the District could adopt the impact fee at approximately 28 percent and
still maintain the current LOS as long as the non-impact fee contributions indicated above
continue and the annual growth rate remains at or below 1.4 percent. However, with the
School Board's input, the County has the legal right to adopt the fees at any level less than
the full calculated amount shown in Table X-10. It is important to note this is a countywide-
calculation and does not take into consideration capacity needs in sub-areas of the county,
such as Fellsmere and North County, where schools are overcrowded.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 141 Impact Fee Update Study
174
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Figure X-1
Educational Facilities Impact Fee-Affordable Growth Approach
160%
140% ------------- ------------------------
120% -------- ---
100%
V)
o
80% r------------ -------------� ;... " ------------------------------------------------------
60% 7------------- ------ ------------- - -
CAnnual
28/ -- Total Cost
40% --- AveR gG owtFi- -
Maximum Impact Fee
LOS Curve
0% r - --r--- r— ---r — r-- r----r——— r —
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00%
Annual Growth Rate
Table X-11 presents the calculated impact fee using the 28-percent adoption ratio. Under
this scenario, the fees would range from $668 for a multi-family home to$1,702 for a single
family home.
Table X-11
Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule-Affordable Growth
Affordable Total Impact Current Percent
Land Use Unit Growth (2) Adopted (4)
Adoption Rate(i) Fee Fee(3) Change
Residential:
Single Family du 28% $1,702 $1,756 -3.1%
Multi-Family du 28% $668 $500 33.7%
Mobile Home du 28% $1,026 $623 64.7%
(1) Source: Figure X-1
(2) Total impact fee from Table X-10(Item 5)multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate(Item 1)
(3) Source: Indian River County Planning Division
(4) Percent change from the current adopted fee(Item 2)to the total impact fee(Item 1)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 142 Impact Fee Update Study
r �7
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Staff Recommended Fee Rate
In the case of educational facilities impact fees, the County staff recommends implementing
the affordable growth fees.
Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison
As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's school impact fee program, a
comparison of the calculated single family school impact fee for IRC to the single family
school impact fees adopted by other counties throughout Florida has been prepared. Table
X-12 presents this comparison.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 143 Impact Fee Update Study
179
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table X-12
Comparison of School Impact Fee Schedules
Date of Adopted
UpdateAdoption
County(l) Last Single Family
Percentage
..
Indian River County(Aff.Growth) 2013 2894o $1,702
Indian River County(2009 Adopted) 2005 100•/ $1,756
Palm Beach County 2012 26% $1,866
Citrus County 2010 50% $1,936
Sarasota County* 2007 n/a $2,032
Lake County 2011 25% $2,573
Volusia County 2013 67% $3,000
Flagler County 2004 76% $3,600
Marion County* 2006 1009/0 $3,967
Hillsborough County 2006 n/a $4,000
Polk County 2010 44% $4,160
Hernando County* 2005 100% $4,266
Brevard County 2004 100% $4,445
Pasco County 2007 47% $4,876
Seminole County 2007 99% $5,000
Collier County 2011 50% $5,378
Martin County 2008 1 100% $5,567
Highlands County* 2006 1009/0 $5,801
St.Johns County 2011 100% $6,072
Indian River County(Calculated) 2013 100.0/0 $6,077
St. Lucie County n/a 100% $6,091
Broward County 2008 1 100% $6,267
Orange County 2011 50% $6,525
Manatee County 2005 100% $6,572
Clay County 2005 n/a $7,034
Osceola County 2012 90% $8,724
(1) County's tagged with an asterisk(*)have fees that are currently suspended
(2) Source: Published impact fee schedules and discussions with representatives from
each County and Tables X-10 and X-11 for Indian River County figures
(3) Represents the full calculated fee for each jurisdiction.
Note:The fees for Manatee County and Volusia County include a 3.0%administrative fee
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 144 Impact Fee Update Study
i7Q
Appendix A
Population
go
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Population
All impact fee program areas (except for educational facilities and transportation) require
the use of population data in calculating current levels-of-service, performance standards,
and future demand for capital facilities. With this in mind, a consistent approach to
developing population estimates and projections is an important component of the data
compilation process. To accurately determine demand for services, as well as to be
consistent with Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan, not only the residents, or
permanent population of the County, but also the seasonal residents and visitors were
considered. Seasonal residents include visitors to hotel and motel facilities, visitors to RV
parks, visitors that stay with relatives and friends, and part-time residents, which are
defined as living in Indian River County for less than six months each year. Therefore, for
purposes of calculating future demand for capital facilities for each impact fee program
area, the weighted average seasonal population will be used in all population estimates and
projections. References to population contained in this report pertain to the weighted
average seasonal population, unless otherwise noted.
Indian River County provides all of the services areas included in the impact fee program
countywide,with the exception of the following three program areas:
• Law enforcement, which is provided in unincorporated county;
• Parks and recreation services, also provided only in unincorporated county; and
• Emergency services, which are provided countywide with the exception of the Town
of Indian River Shores.
Given the differences in services areas, population estimates are provided separately for
these three areas.
Table A-1 presents the population trend for Indian River County. The projections indicate
that the population of Indian River County is estimated to increase by 40 percent between
2013 and 2040 countywide.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-1 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-1
Weighted Population Trends and Projections
UnincorporatedWeighted Seasonal Population Figure
Year Indian River
County(l) Indian River County(2) River Shores(3)
2000 119,351 75,723 115,707
2001 121,732 77,277 118,028
2002 124,110 78,824 120,426
2003 126,869 80,523 123,128
2004 131,175 84,000 127,403
2005 134,573 86,741 130,792
2006 139,121 89,255 135,292
2007 143,177 92,824 139,413
2008 145,212 93,905 141,287
2009 145,356 94,014 141,452
2010 145,854 96,546 141,732
2011 146,325 96,955 142,202
2012 147,118 97,461 142,966
2013 148,001 97,681 143,561
2014 148,964 98,316 144,495
2015 150,081 99,053 145,578
2016 151,175 99,776 146,640
2017 152,612 100,724 148,034
2018 154,214 101,781 149,588
2019 155,911 102,901 151,234
2020 157,705 104,085 152,974
2021 159,470 105,250 154,686
2022 161,463 106,566 156,619
2023 163,563 107,951 158,656
2024 165,771 109,409 160,797
2025 168,091 110,940 163,049
2026 170,444 112,493 165,330
2027 172,950 114,147 167,761
2028 175,526 115,848 170,261
2029 178,124 117,562 172,780
2030 180,743 119,290 175,320
2031 183,381 121,032 177,880
2032 186,031 122,781 180,450
2033 188,710 124,549 183,049
2034 191,428 126,342 185,685
2035 194,165 128,149 188,340
2036 196,923 129,969 191,015
2037 199,699 131,801 193,708
2038 202,495 133,647 196,420
2039 205,289 135,491 199,131
2040 208,079 137,332 201,837
(1) Source:Appendix A,Table A-18
(2) Source:Appendix A,Table A-21
(3) Source:Appendix A,Table A-24
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-2 Impact Fee Update Study
�$2
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Apportionment of Demand by Residential Unit Type and Size
The residential land uses to be used for the impact fee calculations are the following:
• Single Family
• Multi-Family/Accessory Unit
• Mobile Home/RV(tied down)
Table A-2 presents the number of residents per housing unit for the residential categories
identified above in Indian River County. This analysis includes all housing units, both
occupied and vacant.
To address fairness and equity issues between land uses and to be consistent with the
County's current fee schedules, the single family land use is tiered based on four categories
of square footage: less than 1,000 square feet, 1,000 to 1,499 square feet, 1,500 to 2,499
square feet, and 2,500 square feet or greater. To accommodate the tiering of impact fee
assessments for the single family residential land use category, an analysis was completed
based on housing unit size and persons per housing unit. This analysis utilized national data
from the 2011 American Housing Survey (AHS) and date from the 2000 and 2010 U.S.
Census Reports to examine this relationship. Because the 2010 Census data do not provide
population by land use, a comparison of weighted average population per housing units
between the two Census data sets was conducted and the resulting ratio was applied to the
residents per housing unit figure for each land use.
Table A-2
Residents per Housing Unit (Countywide)
Housing Type Population(l) Housing (3) Residents Residents
(2) Ratio Housing Housing Units
Units Units(4) with 0 .
Single Family(detached) 83,4981 34,383 2.43 2.26
Less than 1,000 sf 87% 2.11 1.97
1,000 to 1,499 sf 94% 2.28 2.12
1,500 to 2,499 sf 100% 2.43 2.26
2,500 sf or greater 111% 2.70 2.52
Multi-Family/Accessory 22,768 16,649 1.37 1.28
Mobile Home 10,516 6,786 1.55 1.44
Weighted Average 116,782 57,8181 2.02 1.88
(1) Source:2000 Census,Table H-33(adjusted for peak seasonal population)
(2) Source:2000 Census,Table H-30
(3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey
(4) Population(Item 1)divided by housing units(Item 2)
(5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the
decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-3 Impact Fee Update Study
113
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-3
Residents per Housing Unit(Unincorporated IRC)
(1) Housing (3) Residents Residents
Housing Type Population (2) Ratio Housing Housing Units
Units units(4) with 0 •,
Single Family(detached) 5Z,4ZUI 20,997 2.50 2.33
Less than 1,000 sf 87% 2.18 2.03
1,000 to 1,499 sf 94% 2.35 2.19
1,500 to 2,499 sf 100% 2.50 2.33
2,500 sf or greater 111% 2.78 2.59
Multi-Family/Accessory 14,195 9,923 1.43 1.33
Mobile Home 7,454 5,378 1.39 1.30
Weighted Average 74,069 36,298 2.04 1.90
(1) Source:2000 Census,Table H-33(adjusted for peak seasonal population)
(2) Source:2000 Census,Table H-30
(3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey
(4) Population(Item 1)divided by housing units(Item 2)
(5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the
decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010
Table A-4
Residents per Housing Unit(IRC excluding Indian River Shores)
(1) Housing (3) Residents Residents
Housing Type Population (2) Ratio Housing Housing Units
Units Units(4) rr •
Single Family(detached) 81,290 33,010 2.46 2.29
Less than 1,000 sf 87% 2.14 1.99
1,000 to 1,499 sf 94% 2.31 2.15
1,500 to 2,499 sf 100% 2.46 2.29
2,500 sf or greater 111% 2.73 2.54
Multi-Family/Accessory 21,493 15,176 1.42 1.32
Mobile Home 10,516 6,786 1.55 1.44
Weighted Average 113,299 54,972 2.06 1.92
(1) Source:2000 Census,Table H-33(adjusted for peak seasonal population)
(2) Source:2000 Census,Table H-30
(3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey
(4) Population(Item 1)divided by housing units(Item 2)
(5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the
decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010
Functional Population
Functional population, as used in the impact fee analysis, is a generally accepted
methodology for several impact fee areas and is based on the assumption that demand for
certain facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people at a land use, including
residents, employees, and visitors. It is not enough to simply add resident population to the
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-4 Impact Fee Update Study
� 8�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
number of employees, since the service-demand characteristics can vary considerably by
type of industry.
Functional population is the equivalent number of people occupying space within a
community on a 24-hour-day, 7-days-a-week basis. A person living and working in the
community will have the functional population coefficient of 1.0. A person living in the
community but working elsewhere may spend only 16 hours per day in the community on
weekdays and 24 hours per day on weekends for a functional population coefficient of 0.76
(128-hour presence divided by 168 hours in one week). A person commuting into the
county to work five days per week would have a functional population coefficient of 0.30
(50-hour presence divided by 168 hours in one week). Similarly, a person traveling into the
community to shop at stores, perhaps averaging 8 hours per week, would have a functional
population coefficient of 0.05.
Functional population thus tries to capture the presence of all people within the
community, whether residents, workers, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of effective
population need to be served.
This form of adjusting population to help measure real facility needs replaces the
population approach of merely weighting residents two-thirds and workers one-third
(Nelson and Nicholas 1992). By estimating the functional and weighted population per unit
of land use across all major land uses in a community, an estimate of the demand for
certain facilities and services in the present and future year can be calculated. The
following paragraphs explain how functional population is calculated for residential and
non-residential land uses.
Residential Functional Population
Developing the residential component of functional population is simpler than developing
the non-residential component. It is generally estimated that people spend one-half to
three-fourths of their time at home and the rest of each 24-hour day away from their place
of residence. In developing the residential component of the Indian River County functional
population, an analysis of the County's population and employment characteristics was
conducted. Based on this analysis, it was estimated that people, on average, spend 16.4
hours, or approximately 68 percent, of each 24-hour day at their place of residence and the
other 32 percent away from home. This analysis is presented in Tables A-5 and A-6.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-5 Impact Fee Update Study
189
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-5
Indian River County Population & Employment Characteristics
Item/Calculation Step Figure
Workers who live and work in Indian River County(2010)(1) 47,755
Workers who live in Indian River County but work elsewhere (2010)(1) 8,560
Total workers living in Indian River County(2) 56,315
Indian River County Census Population (2010)13 138,028
Total workers as a percent of population(4) 40.8%
School age population (5-17 years) (2010)(5) 19,444
School age population as a percent of population(6) 14.1%
Population net of workers and school age population(7) 62,269
Other population as a percent of total population(8) 45.1%
(1) Source: Estimated based on data from the 2010 U.S.Census and the Bureau of
Transportation Statistics,Census Transportation Planning Package(CT00) Pt.3
(2) Sum of workers who live/work in IRC and workers who live elsewhere but work in IRC
(3) Source:2010 U.S.Census
(4) Total workers living in IRC(Item 2)divided by the census population(Item 3)
(5) Source:2010 U.S.Census
(6) School age population(Item 5)divided by the census population(Item 3)
(7) Census population(Item 3)less total workers living in Indian River County(Item 2)and
school age population(Item 5)
(8) Population net of worker and school age population(Item 7)divided by census population
(Item 3)
Table A-6
Residential Coefficient for Functional Population
Pop.Group Hours at Percent of Effective
Residence(l) Population(2) Hours(3)
Workers 13 40.80o 5.3
Students 15 14.1% 2.1
Other 1 20 45.1% 9.0
Total Hours at Residence(4) 16.4
Residential Functional Population Coefficient(5)
(1) Source:Assumed
(2) Source:Table A-5
(3) Hours at residence(Item 1)multiplied by percent of population(Item 2)
(4) Sum of effective hours(Item 3)
(5) Total hours at residence(Item 4)divided by 24
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-6 Impact Fee Update Study
( 8G
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
The resulting percentage from Table A-6 is used in the calculation of the residential
coefficient for the 24-hour functional population. These actual calculations are presented in
Table A-8.
Non-Residential Functional Population
Given the varying characteristics of non-residential land uses, developing the estimates of
functional residents for non-residential land uses is more complicated than developing
estimated functional residents for residential land uses. Nelson and Nicholas originally
introduced a method for estimating functional resident population, now used
internationallyl. This method uses trip generation data from the Institute of Transportation
Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual and TOA's Trip Characteristics Database,
information of passengers per vehicle, workers per vehicle, length of time spent at the land
use, and other variables. Specific calculations include:
• Total one-way trips per employee (ITE trips multiplied by 50 percent to avoid double
counting entering and exiting trips as two trips).
• Visitors per impact unit based on occupants per vehicle (trips multiplied by
occupants per vehicle less employees).
• Worker hours per week per impact unit (such as nine worker-hours per day
multiplied by five days in a work week).
• Visitor hours per week per impact unit (visitors multiplied by number of hours per
day times relevant days in a week, such as five for offices and seven for retail
shopping).
• Functional population coefficients per employee developed by estimating time spent
by employees and visitors at each land use.
Table A-7 also shows the functional population coefficients for non-residential uses in
Indian River County. The functional population coefficients in Table A-7 were used to
estimate the County's functional population in Table A-8.
1 Arthur C.Nelson and James C.Nicholas,"Estimating Functional Population for Facility Planning,"Journal of Urban Planning
and Development 118(2):45-58(1992)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-7 Impact Fee Update Study
197
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-7
General Functional Population Coefficients
DailyPopulation/ Employee Trips per One-Way Journey-to-
ITE LUC Hours�n_ Trips per Work Occupants Occupants per (6)
Employment Category Place 1) Employee"' Employee(" per Tri P(4) Employee per Trip") Week"' Population
Trips' Cidefficieni
Population 7.00 0.683
Natural Resources n/a 9.00 3.02 1.51 1.32 1.381 0.09 1.00 7.00 0.379
Construction 110 9.00 3.02 1.51 1.32 1.381 0.09 1.00 5.00 0.271
Manufacturing 140 9.00 2.13 1.07 1.32 1.38 0.06 1.00 5.00 0.270
Transportation,Communication,Utilities 110 9.00 3.02 1.51 1.32 1.38 0.09 1.00 5.00 0.271
Wholesale Trade 150 9.00 3.89 1.95 1.32 1.38 0.12 1.00 5.00 0.271
Retail Trade 820 9.00 52.10 26.05 1.24 1.73 12.76 1.50 7.00 1.173
Finance,Insurance,Real Estate 710 9.00 3.32 1.66 1.24 1.73 0.81 1.00 5.00 0,292
Services"' n/a 9.00 28.62 14.31 1.24 1.73 7.01 1.00 6.00 0.572
Governmentl1Dl 730 9.00 11.95 5.98 1.24 1.73 2.93 1.00 7.00
0.497
(1)Assumed
(2)Trips per employee represents all trips divided by the number of employees and is based on Trip Generation 9th Edition(Institute of Transportation Engineers 2012)as follows:
ITE Code 110 at 3.02 weekday trips per employee,page 93.
ITE Code 140 at 2.13 weekday trips per employee,page 164.
ITE Code 150 at 3.89 weekday tri as per employee,page 193.
ITE Code 710 at 3.32 weekday tri ps per employee,page 1252.
ITE Code 730 at 11.95 weekday trips per employee,page 1304.
ITE Code 82C based on blended average of tri as by retai I center size calculated below,adapted from page 1561.
Trips per retail employee from the following table:
Assumed Sq Ft per Trips per Weighted
Retail Srole Center Size Trip Rate Employeel13l Employee Shore Trips
Neighborhood<50k sq.R 50 86.56 802 69 40.0% 27.60
Community 50k-250k sq.ft. 250 49.28 975 48 30.0% 14.40
Regional 250k-5001,sci t. 500 38.66 1,043 40 20.0% 8.00
Super Reg.50Ck-1000k sq.ft. 1,000 30.33 676 21 10.0% 2.10
Sum of Weighted Trips/Ilk sq.ft. 52.10
(3)Trip per employee(Item 2(multiplied by 0.5.
(4)Journey-to-Work Occupants per Trip from 2001 Nationwide Household Travel Survey(FHWA 2001)as follows:
1.32 occupants per Construction,Manufacturing,TCU,and Wholesale trip
1.24 occupants per Retail Trade,FIRE,and Services trip
(5)Daily Occupants per Trip from 2001 Nationwide Household Travel survey(FHWA 2001)as follows:
1.38 occupants per Construction,Manufacturing,TCU,and Wholesale trip
1.73 occupants per Retail Trade,FIRE,and Services trip
(6)(Daily occupants per trip(Item 5)multiplied by one-way trips per employee(Item 3)l-[(Journey-to-Work occupants per trip(Item 4(multiplied by one-way trips per employee(Item
3)]
(7)Typical number of days per week that indicated industries provide services and relevant government services are available.
(8(Table A-6 for residential and the equation belowto determine the Functional Population Coefficient per Employee for all land-use categories except residential includes the
following:
VDays oer Week x Fri Hours r in Pla 1 IV' it r:i oc[Emolovee x Vis tor Hours Der Trip x Days nor Wmisl
(24 Hours per Day 7 Days per Week)
(9)Trips per employee for the services category is the average trips per employee for the following service related land use categories:quality restaurant,high-turnover restaurant,supermarket,
hotel,motel,elementary school,
middle school,high school,hospital,medical office,and church.Source for the trips per employee figure from ITE,9th ed.,when available,or else derived from the square feet per
employee for the appropriate land use
category from the Energy Information Administration from Table B-1 of the Commercial Energy Building Survey(2003).
(10)Includes Federal Civilian Government,Federal Military Government,and State and Local Government categories.
(11)Square feet per retail employee from the Energy Information Administration from Table B-1 of the Commercial Energy Building Survey,2003
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-8 Impact Fee Update Study
o�
to
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-8
Countywide Functional Population—Year 2013
IndianPopulation Category ..
Coefficient Population
2013 Weighted Population 148,0011 0.6831 101,085
Employment Category
Natural Resources 4,228 0.379 1,602
Construction 3,560 0.271 965
Manufacturing 2,480 0.270 670
Transportation,Communication,and Utilities 1,876 0.271 508
Wholesale Trade 926 0.271 251
Retail Trade 9,526 1.173 11,174
Finance,Insurance,and Real Estate 8,066 0.292 2,355
Services 32,704 0.572 18,707
Government Services 5,772 0.4971 2,869
Total Employment by Category Population(4) 39,101
2013 Total Functional Population(5) 140,186
(1) Source:Table A-1 for population and 2013 Woods&Poole for employment data
(2) Source:Table A-7
(3) The functional population is Indian River County baseline data (Item 1) multiplied by the functional
resident coefficient(Item 2)
(4) The total employment population by category is the sum of the employment figures from the nine
employment categories(e.g., natural resources,construction,etc.)
(5) The total functional population is the sum of the residential functional population (101,085) and
employment functional population(39,101)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-9 Impact Fee Update Study
ISQ
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-9
Unincorporated County Functional Population—Year 2013
Population Category Indian River County Functional Resident Functional
Baseline Data(l) Coefficient(2) Population(3)
2013 Weighted Population 97,6811 0.6831 66,716
Employment Category
Natural Resources 2,832 0.379 1,073
Construction 1,730 0.271 469
Manufacturing 1,661 0.270 448
Transportation,Communication,and Utilities 1,256 0.271 340
Wholesale Trade 560 0.271 152
Retail Trade 5,766 1.173 6,764
Finance,Insurance,and Real Estate 3,919 0.292 1,144
Services 15,891 0.572 9,090
Government Services 2,8051 0.4971 1,394
Total Employment by Category Population 141 20,874
2013 Total Functional Population(5)
87,590
(1) Source:Table A-1 for population and 2013 Woods&Poole for employment data
(2) Source:Table A-7
(3) The functional population is Indian River County baseline data (Item 1) multiplied by the functional
resident coefficient(Item 2)
(4) The total employment population by category is the sum of the employment figures from the nine
employment categories(e.g., natural resources,construction,etc.)
(5) The total functional population is the sum of the residential functional population (66,716) and
employment functional population(20,874)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-10 Impact Fee Update Study
IQa
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-10
IRC excluding Indian River Shores Functional Population—Year 2013
CountyPopulation Category Indian River Resident
Baseline D. Coefficient
2013 Weighted Population 143,5611 0.6831 98,052
Employment Category
Natural Resources 4,189 0.379 1,588
Construction 3,469 0.271 940
Manufacturing 2,457 0.270 663
Transportation,Communication,and Utilities 1,859 0.271 504
Wholesale Trade 912 0.271 247
Retail Trade 9,387 1.173 11,011
Finance,Insurance,and Real Estate 7,859 0.292 2,295
Services 31,867 0.572 18,228
Government Services 5,624 0.497 2,795
Total Employment by Category Population�4� 38,271
2013Total Functional Population(5) 136,323
(1) Source:Table A-1 for population and 2013 Woods&Poole for employment data
(2) Source:Table A-7
(3) The functional population is Indian River County baseline data (Item 1) multiplied by the functional
resident coefficient(Item 2)
(4) The total employment population by category is the sum of the employment figures from the nine
employment categories(e.g., natural resources,construction,etc.)
(5) The total functional population is the sum of the residential functional population (98,052) and
employment functional population(38,271)
Table A-11 presents the County's annual functional population figures from 2000 through
2040, based on the 2013 functional population figures from Tables A-8 through A-10 and
the annual population growth rates from the population figures previously presented in
Table A-1.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-11 Impact Fee Update Study
�QI
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-11
Indian River County Functional Population (2000-2040)
UnincorporatedFunctional Population
Year Indian River
County(l) Indian River County(2) RiverShores(3)
2000 113,139 70,691 110,023
2001 115,402 72,105 112,223
2002 117,710 73,547 114,467
2003 120,300 75,165 116,985
2004 124,390 77,721 120,962
2005 127,624 79,742 124,107
2006 131,963 82,453 128,327
2007 135,790 84,844 132,048
2008 137,691 86,032 133,897
2009 137,829 86,118 134,031
2010 138,242 86,376 134,433
2011 138,657 86,635 134,836
2012 139,350 87,068 135,510
2013 140,186 87,590 136,323
2014 141,167 88,203 137,277
2015 142,155 88,820 138,238
2016 143,150 89,442 139,206
2017 144,582 90,336 140,598
2018 146,172 91,330 142,145
2019 147,780 92,335 143,709
2020 149,553 93,443 145,434
2021 151,198 94,471 147,034
2022 153,164 95,699 148,945
2023 155,155 96,943 15Q881
2024 157,172 98,203 152,842
2025 159,372 99,578 154,982
2026 161,603 100,972 157,152
2027 164,027 102,487 159,509
2028 166,487 104,024 161,902
2029 168,984 105,584 164,331
2030 171,519 107,168 166,796
2031 174,092 108,776 169,298
2032 176,529 110,299 171,668
2033 179,000 111,843 174,071
2034 181,506 113,409 176,508
2035 184,047 114,997 178,979
2036 186,624 116,607 181,485
2037 189,237 118,239 184,026
2038 191,886 119,894 186,602
2039 194,572 121,573 189,214
2040 197,296 123,275 191,863
(1) Source:Table A-8 for 2013 total functional population
(2) Source:Table A-9 for 2013 total functional population
(3) Source:Table A-10 for 2013 total functional population
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-12 Impact Fee Update Study
(q 2.
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Functional Residents by Specific Land Use Category
When a wide range of land uses impact services, an estimate of that impact is needed for
each land use. This section presents functional population estimates by residential and
non-residential land uses.
Residential and Transient Land Uses
As previously mentioned, the average number of persons per housing unit in Indian River
County was calculated for the single family, multi-family, and mobile home/RV land uses,
based on information obtained from the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census. Besides the residential
land uses,the table also includes transient land uses, such as hotels, motels, nursing homes,
and assisted care living facilities (ACLF). Secondary sources, such as the IRC Chamber of
Commerce and the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, are used to determine the
occupancy rate for hotels, motels, and nursing homes/ACLF land uses. As mentioned
before, different functional population coefficients must be developed for each of the
impact fee service areas to be analyzed. For residential and transient land uses, these
coefficients are displayed in Tables A-12 through A-14.
Non-Residential Land Uses
A similar approach is used to estimate functional residents for non-residential land uses.
Table A-15 reports basic assumptions and calculations, such as trips per unit, trips per
employee, employees per impact unit, one-way trips per impact unit, worker hours,
occupants per vehicle trip, visitors (patrons, etc.) per impact unit, visitor hours per trip, and
days per week for non-residential land uses. The final column in the tables shows the
estimated functional resident coefficients by land use. These coefficients by land use create
the demand component for the certain impact fee programs and will be used in the
calculation of the cost per unit for each land use category in the select impact fee
schedules.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-13 Impact Fee Update Study
113
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-12
Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses -Countywide
Impact ITE Residents/ Occupancy Adjusted Peak Visitor Workers Work Day DaysPer Work Week
Residential Land Use (1) Visitors Per (3) Residents Hours at . (6) (7) Residents Per
Unit LUC Unit(2) Rate Per Unit(4) Place(5) Per Unit Hours Week"' Unit(9)
Residential
Single Family(detached)
Less than 1,000 sf du 210 1.97 1.35
1,000 to 1,499 sf du 210 2.12 1.45
1,500 to 2,499 sf du 210 2.26 1.54
2,500 sf or greater du 210 2.52 1.72
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 220 1.28 0.87
Mobile Home/RV(Tied Down) du 240 1.44 0.98
Transient,Assisted,Group
Hotel room 310 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.57 9 7 0.65
Motel room 320 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.44 91 7 0.60
Nursing Home/ACLF bed 252/620 1.00 91%1 0.91 16 0.84 91 7 0.92
(1)Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation Handbook,9th Edition
(2)Estimates for the single family,multi-family,and mobile home land use from Table A-2;estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions.
One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes.
(3)Sourcefor hotel/motel occupancy:lndian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy ratefor 2007 through 2012. Sourcefor nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate is
the Florida Departmentof Elderly Affairs,Indian County Profile. Average occupancy rate for 2011 and 2012.
(4)Residents per unittimes occupancy rate
(5),(7),(8)Estimated
(6)Adapted from ITETrip Generation Handbook,9th Edition
(9)For residential this is Residents Per Unittimes 0.683. For Transient,Assisted,and Group it is:
f(Adiusted Residents per UnitX Hours at PlaceX Days oer Week)+(Workers Per UnitX Work Hours Per Day X Days per Week)]
(24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-14 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-13
Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses—Unincorporated County
Impact ITE Residents/ Occupancy Adjusted Peak Visitor Workers Work Day Days Per WorkWeek
Residential Land Use Visitors Per (3) Residents Hours at (6) (7) Residents Per
Unit LUICM Unit(2) Rate Per Unit(4) Place(5) Per Unit Hours Week"' Unit(9)
Residential
Single Family(detached)
Less than 1,000 sf du 210 2.03 1.39
1,000 to 1,499 sf du 210 2.19 1.50
1,500 to 2,499 sf du 210 2.33 1.59
2,500 sf or greate r du 210 2.59 1.77
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 220 1.33 0.91
Mobile Home/RV(Tied Down) du 240 1.301 0.89
Transient,Assisted,Group
Hotel room 310 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.57 9 71 0.65
Motel room 320 1.70 51%1 0.87 12 0.44 9 71 0.60
Nursing Home/ACLF bed 620 1.00 91%1 0.91 16 0.84 9 71 0.92
(1)Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation Handbook,9th Edition
(2)Estimates for thesingle family,multi-family,and mobile home land usefrom TableA-3;estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions.
One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes.
(3)Sourcefor hotel/motel occupancy:Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy ratefor 2007 through 2012. Sourcefor nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate is
the Florida Departmentof Elderly Affairs,Indian County Profile. Average occupancy ratefor 2011 and 2012.
(4)Residents per unittimes occupancy rate
(5),(7),(8)Estimated
(6)Adapted from ITE Trip Generation Handbook,9th Edition
(9)For residential this is Residents Per Unittimes 0.683. For Transient,Assisted,and Group it is:
((Aaiusted Residents per Unit X Hours at Place X Days per Week)+(Workers Per Unit X Work Hours Per Day X Days per Week)]
(24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
J4 June 2014 A-15 Impact Fee Update Study
1
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-14
Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses—IRC excluding Indian River Shores
Impact ITE Residents/ Occupancy Adjusted Peak Visitor Workers Work Day Days Per Work Week
Residential Land Use (1) Visitors Per (3) Residents Hours at (7) Residents Per
Unit LUC Unit(2) Rate Per Unit(4) Place(5) Per Unit Hours Week") Unitl9)
Residential
Single Family(detached)
Less than 1,000 sf ]N220
210 1.99 1.36
1,000 to 1,499 sf 210 2.15 1.47
1,500 to 2,499 sf 210 2.29 1.56
2,500 sf or gre ate r 210 2.54 1.73
Multi-Family/Accessory Unit 1.32 0.90
Mobile Home/RV(Tied Down) 240 1.44 0.98
Transient,Assisted,Group
Hotel room 1 310 1.70 51%1 0.871 121 0.571 9 71 0.65
Motel room 1 320 1 1.70 51%1 0.871 121 0.441 9 71 0.60
Nursing Home/ACLF bed 1 620 1 1.00 91%1 0.911 161 0.841 71 0.92
(1)Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation Handbook,9th Edition
(2)Estimates for thesingle family,multi-family,and mobile home land usefrom TableA-4;estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions.
One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes.
(3)Source for hotel/motel occupancy:Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy rate for 2007 through 2012. Source for nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate
is
the Florida Departmentof Elderly Affairs,Indian County Profile. Average occupancy rate for 2011 and 2012.
(4)Residents per unittimes occupancy rate
(5),(7),(8)Estimated
(6)Adapted from ITE Trip Generation Handbook,9th Edition
(9)For residential this is Residents Per Unittimes 0.683. For Transient,Assisted,and Group it is:
f(4diusted Residents per UnitX Hours at Place X Days per Weekl+(Workers Per Unit X Work Hours Per Day X Days per Weekll
(24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
Z June 2014 A-16 Impact Fee Update Study
V1_
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-15
Functional Residents for Non-Residential Land Uses
ITE Trips Per Trips Per Employees One-Way Worker Occupants Visitor DaysPer Functional
LUC Land Use Impact Unit Unit(2) Employee(3) Per Unit(4) Factor @ Hours(6) PerTrip(71 Visitors(') Hou r,Per Week"" Resident(11)
office&Financial
720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf 23.83 8.91 2.67 11.92 9 1.42 14.26 1.00 5 1.14
720 Medical Office/Cl i nic greate r than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf 34.72 8.91 3.90 17.36 9 1.42 20.75 1.00 5 1.66
911 Bank/Savings Walk-In 1,000 sf 121.30 34.69 3.50 60.65 9 1.52 88.69 0.35 6 2.23
912 Bank/Savings Drive-In 1,000 sf 159.34 30.94 5.15 79.67 9 1.52 115.95 0.15 6 2.28
710 General Office 1,000 sf 11.03 3.32 3.32 5.52 9 1.28 3.75 1.00 5 1.00
760 Research&Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 2.77 2.93 4.06 9 1.28 2.27 1.00 5 0.85
Industrial
140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 2.13 1.79 1.91 9 1.38 0.85 1.00 5 0.50
150 Warehousing 1,000 sf 3.56 3.89 0.92 1.78 9 1.38 1.54 0.75 5 0.28
151 Mini-Warehouse/Storage 1,000 sf 2.15 61.90 0.03 1.08 9 1.38 1.46 0.75 7 0.06
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 3.77 0.45 0.84 9 1.38 0.71 0.75 5 0.14
110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 3.02 2.31 3.49 9 1.38 2.51 1.00 5 0.69
n/a Concrete Plant acre 15.60 3.02 5.171 7.80 9 1.38 5.59 1.00 5 1.55
n/a Sand Mining acre 2.00 3.02 0.66 1.00 9 1.38 0.72 1.001 5 0.20
Retail
820 Retail 1,000sfgla 42.70 n/a 2.50 21.35 91 1.73 34.44 1.00 7 2.37
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 157.33 n/a 2.50 78.67 9 1.52 117.08 0.20 7 1.91
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 28.25 21.14 1.34 14.13 9 1.73 23.10 1.00 7 1.47
932 Restaurant 1,000 sf 116.60 n/a 9.92 58.30 9 1.85 97.94 0.75 7 6.78
934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 511.00 n/a 10.90 255.50 9 1.85 461.78 0.25 7 8.90
850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 103.38 87.82 1.18 51.69 9 1.52 77.39 0.501 7 2.05
942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf 31.43 n/a 1.50 15.72 9 1.521 22.391 i.00l 7 1.50
947 Self-Service Car Wash service bay 43.94 n/a 0.50 21.97 9 1.52 32.89 0.50 7 0.87
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 775.14 n/al 2.50 387.57 9 1.52 586.611 0.20 7 5.83
890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 12.191 0.42 2.53 91 1.52 3.431 0.501 7 0.23
Recreational
430 Golf Course hole 35.74 20.52 1.74 17.87 9 2.39 40.97 0.25 7 1.08
492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 32.93 n/a 2.00 16.47 9 2.39 37.36 1.50 7 3.09
412 County Park acre 2.28 n/a 0.10 1.14 9 2.39 2.62 1.50 7 0.20
491 Tennis Court court 38.70 45.71 0.85 19.35 9 2.39 45.40 1.50 7 3.16
420 Marina berth 2.96 20.52 0.14 1.48 9 2.39 3.40 1.00 7 0.19
Govemmental
732 Post Office 1,000 sf 108.191 25.371 4.261 54.10 9 1.28 64.99 0.25 5 1.62
590 Library 1,000sf 56.241 52.521 1.071 28.121 9 1.20 32.67 1.00 7 1.76
733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf 27.921 7.751 3.60 13.961 9 1.28 14.27 1.D0j 5 1.39
571 Jail bed 5.50 2.50 2.201 2.751 9 1.20 1.10 1.001 7 0.87
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-17 Impact Fee Update Study
^'J
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table A-15(continued)
Functional Residents for Non-Residential Land Uses
One-Way Worker Occupants Visitor DaysPer Functional
ITE Trips Per Trips Per Employees
(1) Land Use Impact Unit (2) (3) (4) Factor @ (6) 17) Visitors(') HoursPer Resident
LUC Unit Employee Per Unit 50%(5) Hours Per Trip TripM Week"" Coefficient 0 1)
Miscellaneous
565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 71.88 26.73 2.69 35.94 91 1.11 37.20 0.15 5 0.89
610 Hospital 1,000 sf 13.22 4.50 2.94 6.61 9 1.42 6.45 1.00 71 1.37
640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 40.12 n/a 4.05 20.06 9 1.42 24.44 1.00 7 2.54
560 Church 1,000 sf 9.11 20.64 0.44 4.56 9 1.90 8.22 1.00 7 0.51
444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 106.63 53.12 2.01 53.32 9 2.39 125.42 1.00 7 5.98
520 Elementary School(Private,K-5) student 1.29 15.71 0.08 0.65 9 1.11 0.64 2.00 5 0.06
522 Middle School(Private,6-8) student 1.62 16.39 0.10 0.81 9 1.11 0.801 2.00 5 0.07
530 High School(Private,9-12) student 1.71 19.741 0.09 0.861 9 1.111 0.861 2.001 5 0.08
540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 2.00 12.26 0.16 I.C)01 9 1.111 0.951 2.00 1 5 0.10
n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 5.40 n/al 0.70 2.701 9 1.201 2.541 3.501 7 0.63
Sources:
(1)Land use code found i n the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Tri p Generation Ha ndbook,9th Edition
(2)Land uses and trip generation rates consistent with those included in the 2013 Transportation Impact Fee Update Study
(3)Trips per employee from ITE Trip Generation Handbook,9th Edition,when available
(4)Tri ps per i mpact unit di vi ded by tri ps per person(usual ly empl oyee).When tri ps per pers on a re not ava i l a bl e,the empl oyees per unit i s esti mated.
(5)Trips per unit(item 2)multiplied by 50 percent
(6),(9),(10)Estimated
(7)Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey
(8)[(One-way Trips/UnitX Occupants/Trip)-Employees].
(11)[(Workers X Hours/DayX Days/Week)+(Visitors X Hours/VisitX Days/Week)]/(24 Hours x7 Days)
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-18 Impact Fee Update Study
A
°0
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections(Countywide):
Table A-16 Table A-17 Table A-18
IRC Permanent Population Projections IRC Seasonal Population Projections IRC Weighted Seasonal Population Projections
Permanen Seasonal Permanent Seasonal Total
Year Populatio Year Population Year Population Population Weighted
Season Pop.
2000A
12,947 2000 15,248 2000 112947 6404 119,351
200115,200 2001 15,552 2001 115,200 6,532 121,732
2002 117,450 2002 15,856 2002 117,450 6,660 124,110
2003 120,062 2003 16,208 2003 120,062 6,807 126,869
2004 124,137 2004 16,758 2004 124,137 7,038 131,175
2005 127,352 2005 17,193 2005 127,352 7,221 134,573
2006 131,656 2006 17,774 2006 131,656 7,465 139,121
2007 135,494 2007 18,292 2007 135,494 7,683 143,177
2008 137,420 2008 18,552 2008 137,420 7,792 145,212
2009 137,557 2009 18,570 2009 137,557 7,799 145,356
2010 138,028 2010 18,634 2010 138,028 7,826 145,854
2011 138,694 2011 18,169 2011 138,694 7,631 146,325
2012 139,446 2012 18,267 2012 139,446 7,672 147,118
2013 140,283 2013 18,377 2013 140,283 7,718 148,001
2014 141,195 2014 18,497 2014 141,195 7,769 148,964
2015 142,254 2015 18,635 2015 142,254 7,827 150,081
2016 143,463 2016 18,363 2016 143,463 7,712 151,175
2017 144,826 2017 18,538 2017 144,826 7,786 152,612
2018 146,347 2018 18,732 2018 146,347 7,867 154,214
2019 147,957 2019 18,938 2019 147,957 7,954 155,911
2020 149,659 2020 19,156 2020 149,659 8,046 157,705
2021 151,455 2021 19,083 2021 151,455 8,015 159,470
2022 153,348 2022 19,322 2022 153,348 8,115 161,463
2023 155,342 2023 19,573 2023 155,342 8,221 163,563
2024 157,439 2024 19,837 2024 157,439 8,332 165,771
2025 159,643 2025 20,115 2025 159,643 8,448 168,091
2026 161,942 2026 20,243 2026 161,942 8,502 170,444
2027 164,323 2027 20,540 2027 164,323 8,627 172,950
2028 166,771 2028 20,846 2028 166,771 8,755 175,526
2029 169,239 2029 21,155 2029 169,239 8,885 178,124
2030 171,727 2030 21,466 2030 171,727 9,016 180,743
2031 174,234 2031 21,779 2031 174,234 9,147 183,381
2032 176,752 2032 22,094 2032 176,752 9,279 186,031
2033 179,297 2033 22,412 2033 179,297 9,413 188,710
2034 181,879 2034 22,735 2034 181,879 9,549 191,428
2035 184,480 2035 23,060 2035 184,480 1 9,685 194,165
2036 187,100 2036 23,388 2036 187,100 9,823 196,923
2037 189,738 2037 23,717 2037 189,738 9,961 199,699
2038 192,394 2038 24,049 2038 192,394 10,101 202,495
2039 195,049 2039 24,381 2039 195,049 10,240 205,289
2040 197,700 2040 24,713 2040 197,700 10,379 208,079
Notes:
Table A-16:BEBR-Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates
Table A-17:Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040
Table A-18:Seasonal population from Table A-17 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the
year(assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months=0.42).
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-19 Impact Fee Update Study
raq
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections(Unincorporated County):
Table A-19 Table A-20 Table A-21
IRC Permanent Population Projections IRC Seasonal Population Projections IRC Weighted Seasonal Population Projections
Permanen Seasonal Permanent Seasonal Total
Year 'nen Year Year Weighted
Populatio Population Population Population Season Pop.
2000 71,660 2000 9,674 2000 71,660 4,063 75,723
2001 73,130 2001 9,873 2001 73,130 4,147 77,277
2002 74,595 2002 10,070 2002 74,595 4,229 78,824
2003 76,202 2003 10,287 2003 76,202 4,321 80,523
2004 79,493 2004 10,732 2004 79,493 4,507 84,000
2005 82,087 2005 11,082 2005 82,087 4,654 86,741
2006 84,466 2006 11,403 2006 84,466 4,789 89,255
2007 87,843 2007 11,859 2007 87,843 4,981 92,824
2008 88,866 2008 11,997 2008 88,866 5,039 93,905
2009 88,969 2009 12,011 2009 88,969 5,045 94,014
2010 91,366 2010 12,334 2010 91,366 5,180 96,546
2011 91,899 2011 12,039 2011 91,899 5,056 96,955
2012 92,378 2012 12,102 2012 92,378 5,083 97,461
2013 92,587 2013 12,129 2013 92,587 5,094 97,681
2014 93,189 2014 12,208 2014 93,189 5,127 98,316
2015 93,888 2015 12,299 2015 93,888 5,166 99,053
2016 94,686 2016 12,120 2016 94,686 5,090 99,776
2017 95,585 2017 12,235 2017 95,585 5,139 100,724
2018 96,589 2018 12,363 2018 96,589 5,192 101,781
2019 97,652 2019 12,499 2019 97,652 5,250 102,901
2020 98,775 2020 12,643 2020 98,775 5,310 104,085
2021 99,960 2021 12,595 2021 99,960 5,290 105,250
2022 101,210 2022 12,752 2022 101,210 5,356 106,566
2023 102,526 2023 12,918 2023 102,526 5,426 107,951
2024 103,910 2024 13,093 2024 103,910 5,499 109,409
2025 105,364 2025 13,276 2025 105,364 5,576 110,940
2026 106,882 2026 13,360 2026 106,882 5,611 112,493
2027 108,453 2027 13,557 2027 108,453 5,694 114,147
2028 110,069 2028 13,759 2028 110,069 5,779 115,848
2029 111,698 2029 13,962 2029 111,698 5,864 117,562
2030 113,340 2030 14,167 2030 113,340 5,950 119,290
2031 114,994 2031 14,374 2031 114,994 6,037 121,032
2032 116,656 2032 14,582 2032 116,656 6,124 122,781
2033 118,336 2033 14,792 2033 118,336 6,213 124,549
2034 120,040 2034 15,005 2034 120,040 6,302 126,342
2035 121,757 2035 15,220 2035 121,757 6,392 128,149
2036 123,486 2036 15,436 2036 123,486 6,483 129,969
2037 125,227 2037 15,653 2037 125,227 6,574 131,801
2038 126,980 2038 15,873 2038 126,980 6,667 133,647
2039 128,732 2039 16,092 2039 128,732 6,759 135,491
2040 130,482 2040 16,310 2040 130,482 6,850 137,332
Notes:
Table A-19:BEER-Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates. Unincorporated population is
assumed to be 66 percent of the total population based on the average ratio of unincorporated population to total population from the previous five years.
Table A-20:Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040
Table A-21:Seasonal population from Table A-19 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the
year(assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months=0.42).
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-20 Impact Fee Update Study
200
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections(Countywide,excluding Indian River Shores):
Table A-22 Table A-23 Table A-24
IRC Permanent Population Projections IRC Seasonal Population Projections IRC Weighted Seasonal Population Projections
Permanen Seasonal Permanent Seasonal Total
Year Populatio Year Population Year Population Population Weighted
Season Pop.
2000 109,499 2000 14,782 2000 109,499 6,208 115,707
2001 111,695 2001 15,079 2001 111,695 6,333 118,028
2002 113,964 2002 15,385 2002 113,964 6,462 120,426
2003 116,521 2003 15,730 2003 116,521 6,607 123,128
2004 120,567 2004 16,277 2004 120,567 6,836 127,403
2005 123,774 2005 16,709 2005 123,774 7,018 130,792
2006 128,033 2006 17,2842006 128,033 7,259 135,292
2007 131,932 2007 17,811 2007 131,932 7,481 139,413
2008 133,706 2008 18,050 2008 133,706 7,581 141,287
2009 133,862 2009 18,071 2009 133,862 7,590 141,452
2010 134,127 2010 18,107 2010 134,127 7,605 141,732
2011 134,786 2011 17,657 2011 134,786 7,416 142,202
2012 135,510 2012 17,752 2012 135,510 7,456 142,966
2013 136,075 2013 17,826 2013 136,075 7,487 143,561
2014 136,959 2014 17,942 2014 136,959 7,536 144,495
2015 137,986 2015 18,076 2015 137,986 7,592 145,578
2016 139,159 2016 17,812 2016 139,1597,481 146,640
2017 140,481 2017 17,982 2017 140,481 7,552 148,034
2018 141,957 2018 18,170 2018 141,957 7,631 149,588
2019 143,5182019 18,370 2019 143,518 7,715 151,234
2020 145,169 2020 18,582 2020 145,169 7,804 152,974
2021 146,911 2021 18,511 2021 146,911 7,775 154,686
2022 148,748 2022 18,742 2022 148,748 7,872 156,619
2023 150,682 2023 18,986 2023 150,682 7,974 158,656
2024 152,716 2024 19,242 2024 152,716 8,082 160,797
2025 154,854 2025 19,512 2025 154,854 8,195 163,049
2026 157,084 2026 19,635 2026 157,084 8,247 165,330
2027 159,393 2027 19,924 2027 159,393 8,368 167,761
2028 161,768 2028 20,221 2028 161,768 8,493 170,261
2029 164,162 2029 20,520 2029 164,162 8,618 172,780
2030 166,575 2030 20,822 2030 166,575 8,745 175,320
2031 169,007 2031 21,126 2031 169,007 8,873 177,880
2032 171,449 2032 21,431 2032 171,449 9,001 180,450
2033 173,918 2033 21,740 2033 173,918 9,131 183,049
2034 176,423 2034 22,053 2034 176,423 9,262 185,685
2035 178,946 2035 22,368 2035 178,946 9,395 188,340
2036 181,487 2036 22,686 2036 181,487 9,528 191,015
2037 184,046 2037 23,006 2037 184,046 9,663 193,708
2038 186,622 2038 23,328 2038 186,622 9,798 196,420
2039 189,198 2039 23,650 2039 189,198 9,933 199,131
2040 191,769 2040 23,971 2040 191,769 10,068 201,837
Notes:
Table A-22:BEBR-Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates. Population excluding Indian River
Shores is assumed to be 97 percent of the total population based on the average ratio of the population excluding Indian River Shores to the total population
from the previous five years.
Table A-23:Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040
Table A-24:Seasonal population from Table A-22 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the
year(assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months=0.42).
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 A-21 Impact Fee Update Study
20 l
Appendix B
Transportation Impact Fee
Demand Component Calculations
2-02-
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Demand Component
This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the demand component of the
transportation impact fee update.
Interstate and Toll Facility Discount Factor
Table B-1 presents the interstate and toll facility discount factor used in the calculation of
the transportation impact fee. This variable is based on data from the Greater Treasure
Coast regional travel demand model, specifically the 2035 projected vehicle miles of travel,
accounting for roadway improvements included in the 2035 Long Range Transportation
Plan. It should be noted that discount factor excludes external-to-external trips, which
represent traffic that goes through Indian River County, but does not necessarily stop in the
county. This traffic is excluded from the calculations since it does not come from
development within the county. The I/T discount factor is used to reduce the VMT that the
impact fee charges for each land use.
Table B-1
Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor
Roadway
(2035)
1-95&Turnpike (SR 19) 838,313 17.3%
Other Roads 4,005,935 82.7%
Total (All Roads) 4,844,247 100.0•%
Total(interstate/Toll Roads) 838,313 17.3%
Source:Greater Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model v3.4
Single Family Residential Trip Generation Rate Tiering
As part of this study, an update to the tiering of the assessed impact fee for the single family
residential (detached) land use, to ensure equity by size of home, is included. To facilitate
this, an analysis was completed on the comparative relationship between housing size and
household travel behavior. This analysis utilized data from the 2009 National Household
Travel Survey (NHTS) and the 2011 American Housing Survey (AHS) to examine overall trip-
making characteristics of households in the United States.
Table B-2 presents the existing trip characteristics being utilized in the current adopted
impact fee schedule for the single family (detached) land use. The 2009 NHTS database was
used to assess average annual household vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for various annual
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-1 Impact Fee Update Study
2-03
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
household income levels. In addition, the 2011 AHS database was used to compare median
annual family/household incomes with housing unit size. It is important to recognize that
the use of the income variable in each of these databases is completed simply to provide a
convenient linking mechanism between household VMT from the NHTS and housing unit
size from the AHS.
Table B-2
Calculated Single Family Trip Characteristics
Calculated Values Trip Rate Assessable Daily VMT Ratio to
Excluding Tiering Trip Length Mean
Single Family(Detached) 7.811 6.621 51.701 1.00
Source: FL Studies for LUC 210,shown later in this appendix
The results of the NHTS and AHS analyses are included in Tables B-3 and B-4. First, the data
shown in Table B-3 indicates that the average income in the U.S. for families/households
living in housing units between 1,500 and 2,499 square feet in size ($62,563) is slightly
lower than the overall average income for the U.S. ($62,831). Then, in Table B-4, annual
average household VMT was calculated from the NHTS database for a number of different
income levels and raged related to the resulting AHS income data in Table B-3.
Table B-3
Annual Income by Housing Size
2011 AHS Average Income
Data by •
Incomem
Less than 1,000 sf $34,135
1,000 to 1,499 sf $45,489
1,500 to 2,499 sf $62,563
2,500 sf or more $79,443
Average of All Houses $62,831
Source:2011 American Household Survey
Table B-4
NHTS VMT Annual VMT by Income Category
Ratio2009 NHTS Travel Data by Annual Days DailyVMT to Normalized,
Annual HH Income VMT/HH Mean
to 0.995
Average of$34,135 17,787 365 48.73 0.736 0.740
Average of$45,489 20,103 365 55.08 0.831 0.835
Average of$62,563 24,069 365 65.94 0.995 1.000
Total (All Homes) 24,181 365 66.25 1.000 -
Average of$79,443 28,3491 3651 77.671 1.172 1.178
Source:2009 National Household Travel Survey Database,Federal Highway Administration
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-2 Impact Fee Update Study
20�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
To calculate a corresponding trip rate for the new tiers it was necessary to rely on
comparative ratios. As an example, consider the $34,135 annual income category. First, it
was determined that the average annual household VMT for this income level is 17,787
miles. This figure was then compared to the overall average annual VMT per household in
the U.S. and normalized to the average of the $62,563 (24,069 miles) category to derive a
ratio of 0.740. Next, the normalized ratio was applied to the daily VMT for the average
single family housing unit size (Less than 1,000 sf) to generate a daily VMT of 38.26 for the
new tier, as shown in Table B-5. This daily VMT figure was then divided by the proposed
assessable trip length of 6.62 miles to obtain a typical trip rate of 5.78 trips per day.
Table B-5
Trip Generation Rate by Single Family Land Use Tier
Estimation of Trip Rate by (1) Assessable Daily Ratio to
Tier Trip Length VIVIT Mean
Single Family(Detached)
Less than 1,000 sf 5.78 6.62 38.26 0.740
1,000 to 1,499 sf 6.52 6.62 43.17 0.835
1,500 to 2,499 sf 7.81 6.62 51.70 1.000
12,500 sf or I a rge r 9.201 6.621 60.90 1.178
(1) Daily VMT(Item 3)divided by assessable trip length(Item 2)for each tiered single
family land use category
(2) Source:Table B-2
(3) Ratio to the mean(Item 4)divided by the total daily VMT for the 1,500 to 2,499 sf tier
for each tiered sf single family land use category
(4) Source:Table B-4
Table B-6 illustrates the impact that the incorporation of the trip generation rate tiers for
the single family (detached) land use have on the County's calculated impact fee schedule.
Table B-6
Net Impact Fee by Single Family Land Use Tier
Impact of Tiering on Fee Trip Rate(l) Assessable DailyVMT NetFee(2)
Schedule Trip Length
Single Family(Detached)
Less than 1,000 sf 5.78 6.62 38.26 $3,149
1,000 to 11 499 sf 6.52 6.62 43.17 $3,554
1,500 to 2,499 sf 7.81 6.62 51.70 $4,248
2,500 sf or larger 9.20 6.62 60.90 $5,004
(1) Source:Table B-5,Item 1
(2) Source:Appendix E,Table E-1
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-3 Impact Fee Update Study
2,oS
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database
The Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database includes over 200 studies on 40 different
residential and non-residential land uses collected over the last 20 years. Data from these
studies include trip generation, trip length, and percent new trips for each land use. This
information has been used in the development of impact fees and the creation of land use plan
category trip characteristics for communities throughout Florida and the U.S.
TOA estimates trip generation rates for all land uses in a transportation impact fee schedule
using data from studies in the Florida Studies Database and the Institute of Transportation
Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (9th edition). In instances, when both ITE Trip
Generation reference report (9th edition) and Florida Studies trip generation rate (TGR) data are
available for a particular land use, the data is typically blended together to increase the sample
size and provide a more valid estimate of the average number of trips generated per unit of
development. If no Florida Studies data is available,only TGR data from the ITE reference report
is used in the fee calculation.
The trip generation rate for each respective land use is calculated using machine counts that
record daily traffic into and out of the site studied. The traffic count hoses are set at entrances to
residential subdivisions for the residential land uses and at all access points for non-residential
land uses.
The trip length information is obtained through origin-destination surveys that ask respondents
where they came from prior to arriving at the site and where they intended to go after leaving
the site. The results of these surveys were used to estimate average trip length by land use.
The percent new trip variable is based on assigning each trip collected through the origin-
destination survey process a trip type (primary, secondary,diverted,and captured). The percent
new trip variable is then calculated as 1 minus the percentage of trips that are captured. TOA
has published an article entitled, Measuring Travel Characteristics for Transportation Impact
Fees, ITEJournal,April 1991 on the data collecting methodology for trip characteristics studies.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-4 Impact Fee Update Study
2,oG
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Mini-Warehouse(ITE LUC 151)
Total# #Trip LengthPercent New VMT Source
Location Sim(1,000 sf) Date Interviews Interviews TOP Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Trips
Orange Co,FL - - 1.45 - - Orange County
107.0
Orange County
Orange Co,FL 89.6 - 1.23 - - -
139 - - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 84 .
.7 - - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 93.0 - - - 1.51 -
Orange Cc,FL 77.0 - - 2.18 - - - Orange County
Total Size 451.3 5 Average ir`p Length: n/a
ITE 784.0 14 Weighted Average Trlp Length: n/a
Blended total 1,235.3 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: -
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 1.53
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.50
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.15
Single-Family Detached Housing (ITE LUC 210)
Total# #Trip Length Percent New vMT Source
Location Size/Units Date Interviews Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Trips
5.40 N/A 31.32 Street Smarts
Gwi onett Co,GA 12/13-18/92 - 5.80
Gwinnett Co,6A - 12/13-18/92 - - 5.40 - 6.10 N/A 32.94 Street Smarts
Sarasota Co,FL 76 lun-93 70 70 10.03 - 6.00 N/A 60.18 Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 79 Jun9386 86 9.77 - 4.40 N/A 42.99 Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 135 __jun 93 75 75 8.05 - 5.90 N/A 47.50 Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 152 Jun 93 63 63 1 8.55 7.30 N/A 62.42 Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 193 Jun-93 123 123 6.85 - 4.60 N/A 31.51 Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 97 Jun-93 33 33 13.20 - 3.00 N/A 39.60 Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 282 Jun 93 146 146 6.61 - 8.40 N/A 55.52 Sarasota County
Sarasota Cc,FL 393 Jun 93 207 207 7.76 - 5.40 N/A 41.90 Sarasota County
Hernando Co,FL 76 May-96 148 148 10.01 9a-6p 4.85 N/A 48.55 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 128 May-96 205 205 8.17 9a-6p 6.03 N/A 49.27 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 232 May-96 182 182 7.24 9a-6p 5.04 N/A 36.49 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 301 May-96 264 264 8.93 9a-6p 3.28 N/A 29.29 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 135 Oct-97 230 5.30 9a Sip 7.90 N/A 41.87 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Cc,Fl 142 Oct-97 245 - 5.20 9a-5p 4.10 N/A 21.32 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL150 Oct-97 160 - 5.00 9a-5 10.80 N/A 54.00 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
- 7.60 9a-Sp 4.60 N/A 34.96 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 215 Oct-97 158
Charlotte Co,FL 257 Oct-97 225 - 7.60 9a-Sp 7.40 N/A 56.24 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 345 Oct-97 161 - 7.00 9a-Sp 6.60 N/A 46.20 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 368 Oct-97 152 - 6.60 9a-Sp 5.70 N/A 37.62 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 383 Oct-97 816 - 8.0 9a-5 5.00 N/A 42.00 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 441 Oct-97 195 8.220 9a-Sp 4.70 N/A 38.54 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 10169 Oct-97 348 6.10 9a-5p 8.00 N/A 48.80 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL 90 Dec-99 91 - 12.80 Sa-6p 11.40 N/A 145.92 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL 400 Dec-99 389 - 7.80 Ba-6p 6.40 N/A 49.92 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Take C.
C. 49 Apr-02 170 - 6.70 7a-6p 10.20 N/A 68.34 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,Fl 52 Apr-02 212 - 10.00 7a-6p 7.60 N/A 76.00 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 126 Apr-02 217 8.50 7a-6p 8.30 N/A 70.55 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 5S A r-02 133 - 6.80 8a-6 8.12 N/A 55.22 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,Fl 60 A r-02 106 - 7.73 Ba-6 8.75 N/A 67.64 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 70 A r-02 188 - 7.80 8a-6 6.03 N/A 47.03 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 74 Apr-02 188 BAR 8a-6p 5.95 N/A 48.67 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 189Apr-02 261 - 7.46 8a-6p 8.99 N/A 67.07 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Co,FL 102 A r-02 167 -
8.02 7a-6 5.10 N/A 40.90 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 105 A r-02 169 - 7.23 7a-6 7.22 N/A 52.20 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 124 A r-02 170 6.04 7a-6 7.29 N/A 44.03 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 132 Apr-02 111 - 7.87 7a-6p 7.00 N/A 55.09 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 133 Apr-02 209 - 8.04 7a-6p 4.92 N/A 39.56 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Citrus Co,FL 111 Oct-03 273 - 8.66 7a-6p 7.70 N/A 66.68 Tindale-Oliver&Asmciates
Citrus Co,FL 231 Oct-03 155 - 5.71 7a-6 4.82 N/A 27.52 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Citrus Co,FL 306 Oct-03 146 8.40 7a-6p 3.94 N/A 33.10 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Citrus Co,FL 364 Oct-03 345 - 7.20 7a 6p 9.14 N/A 65.81 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Citrus Co,FL 374 Oct-03 248 - 1130 7a-6p 6.88 N/A 84.62 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Cc,FL 42 Dec-06 122 - 11.26 - 5.56 N/A 62.61 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 51 Dec-06 346 - 18.22 - 9.46 N/A 172.36 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 59 De 06 144 12.07 10.79 N/A 130.24 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 90 Dec-06 194 - 9.12 - 5.78 N/A 52.71 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 239 Dec-06 385 - 7.58 - 8.93 N/A 67.69 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 232 Apr-07 516 - 8.02 7a-6p 8.16 N/A 65.44 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 95 Apr-07 256 8.08 7a-6p 5.88 N/A 47.51 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 90 Apr 07 338 - 7.13 7a-6p 5.86 N/A 41.78 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 58 Apr-07 153 - 6.16 7a-6p 8.39 N/A 51.68 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL 74 Mar-O8 503 - 12.81 7a-6p 3.05 N/A 39.07 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL 97 Mar-08 512 - 8.78 7a-6 11.29 N/A 99.13 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL 315 Mar-08 1,347 - 6.97 7a 6p 6.55 N/A 45.65 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,Fl 42 Mar-Oe 314 - 9.55 7a-6p 10.98 N/A 104.86 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Average TrILen h: 6.79
Total Size 10,380 55 13,130
Wei hted A-E Tri p Len h: 6.62
Note:Georgia studies are not included in summary statistics. Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 7.81
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-5 Impact Fee Update Study
2D7
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Multi-Family/Apartment and Residential Condo/Townhouse(ITE LUC 220/230)
Total if #Trip Length iH4d
Source
Location Size/Units Date Interviews Interviews Trip Can Rate Time Period Trip Length
5.20 Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,Fl 212 lun-93 42 42 5.78 Sarasota County
Sarasota Cc,FL 243 lun-93 36 36 5.84 4.61 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 214 Apr-02 175 175 6.84 3.437 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 240 Apr-02 174 174 6.96 5.551 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 288 A r-02 175 175 5.66 - 688 N/A 3942 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 480 Apr 02 175 175 5.73 - 594 N/A 3243 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,Fl 500 Apr-02 170 170 5.46 - 533 N/A 35.76 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Cc,FL 250 Dec-06 135 135 6.71 - 262 N/A 3660 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 157 Dec-06 265 265 13.97 - 6Waa=
ndale-Oliver&AssociatesLake Co,FL 169 Dec-06 212 - 8.09 -
IakeCo,FL 226 Dec-06 301 - 6.74 - 2.17ndale-Oliver&AssociatesHernando Cc,FL 312 Apr-07 456 - 4.09 - 5.95ndale-Oliver&AssociatesHernando
Co,FL 176 Apr-07 332 - 5.38ndale-Oliver&AssociatesHernando Co,FL 31 Ma-96 31 31 6.12 9a- . ndale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 128 Ma-96 128 128 6.47 9a-6 5.18 N/AA 33-51 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 229 A r-02 198 198 4.77 9a- - 1497 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 248 A r-02 353 353 4.24 9a-6p 3.53 N/A
Total Size 4,103 Avera Trlp Length: 4.84
Total Size Size
3,631 Wei hted Avera eTri Len h: 5.10
LUC Ir 220,Multi-Fam'iv
Total Size 3,467 13 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.31
ITE 18_,480 88 ITEAverage Trip Generation Rate: 6.65
Blended total 21,947 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.60
Olr pan r..dortownhause
LUC 230Studies are highlighted
Total Size 636 4 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 4.97
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.81
ITE IMM 56
Blended total 10,660 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.76
Mobile Home Park(ITE LUC 240)
Tota"'
Trip Gen Rate Time Peri
#Trip Length Perce nt New VMT Source
Location Size/Units Date Interviews Interviews od Trip Length Td Ps
Marion Cc,FL 67 lu1-91 22 22 5.40 48hrs. 2.29 N/A 12.37 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Co,FL 82 Jul-91 58 58 10.80 24hr. 3.72 N/A 40.18 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Co,FL 137 Ju1-91 22 22 3.10 24hr. 4.88 N/A 15.13 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Co,FL 188A
pr-02 147 3.51 24hr. 5.48 N/A 19.23 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 227 Apr-02
2.76 24hr. 8.B0 N/A 24.29 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Sarasota Co,Fl 235 lun-93 100 100 3.51
5.30 N/A 17.90 Sarasota Count
Marion Cc,FL 297Apr-02 175 - 4.78 24hr. 4.76 N/A 22.75 Kimley-Horn&Associates
_ 4.40 N/A 18.44 Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 996 1 jun 1181 181 4.19 4.13 N/A 17.06 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 1,892 May-96 425 425 4.13 9a-6p
Total Size 4,121 9 1,303 Average Trip Length: 4.84
Weighted Average Trip Length: 4.61)
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 4.17
Senior Adult Housing-Attached(ITE LUC 252)
Tota l# #Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
Location Size/Units Date Trip Gen Rate Time Pedod Trip length Trips
In Interviews
- 8.07 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Sun Cit Center,FL 208 Oct-91 726 726 2�Average Trip Length: 3.ffi
Total Size 208 1
ITE 230 5 Weighed Average Trip Length: 3.28
Blended total 438 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.46
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 3.44
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Gene ration Rate: 2.97
Congregate Care Facility(ITE LUC 253)
Pe rcent New
A�ff
Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length VMT Source
Locatio:n=,. ts Date Tnps
Tindale Olive&Associates
Pinellas Park,FL 72 Aug-83.50 gam-Spm 2.20 79'0 770 Tindale Oliver&Associates
Palm Harbor,FL 200 Oct-8340Total Size 272 2 83Avera Tri Len h: 2.80
ITE388 2Wei hted Avera eTa Len h: 3.08
Blended total 660 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 71.6
460 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 3.50
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.02
Blend of FI-Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.25
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-6 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Hotel(ITE LUC 310)
Total# #Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
Location Size(Rooms) Date Interviews Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip length Trips
Pinellas Co,FL 174 Aug-89 134 106 12.50 7-lla/3-7p 6.30 79.0 62.21 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Plnellas Co,FL 114 Oct-89 30 14 7.30 12-7p 6.20 47.0 21.27 TindaleOliver&Associates
- - - - Orange County
Orange Cc,FL 70 - - 1.85 _ _ _ Oran eCoun
Oran a Co,FL 211
2 78 - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 112
Orange Co,FI 1,495
370 - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 123 - - _ - _ Orange County
Orange Co,FL 130
4.69 - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 1,499
Orange Co,FL 190
_ 4.81 - - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 123 - - - _ Orange County
Orange Co,FL 105 -
5 27 _ Oran eCount
Oran eCc,FL 120
Oran aCo,FL 1,114 - -
- 6.10 - - - - Oran eCount
Oran:!.
ran e Co,FL 128 - - - Orange County
Orange Cc,FL 174 - 7.03 - -
- - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 144 - - 732 _ - _ Oran eCoun
Oran a Cc,FL 98 - - - 7.32 -
- Oran eCount
Oran a Co,FL 106 - - 734 _ Oran eCount
Oran a Co,FL 100 - - 7.37 - - -
7.66� - Orange County
Orange Cc,FL 144 -
TotalSlze 6,944 21 164 Avera eTri Len h: 6.25
ITE 44,760 10 Weighted Average Tri Len h: 6.26
Blended total 11,704 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 66.3
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.12
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 8.17
Blend of Fl Studies and ITE Average Td p Generation Rate: 6.36
Motel(ITE LUC 320)
Total# #Trip Le ngth Percent New VMT Source
rviews
Location
Size(Rooms) Date Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip length Trips
Interviews Inte
24 - 10a-2p 280 65.0 Tl ndale-Oliver&Associates
.
Pinellas Co,FL 48 Oct-89 46 Tindale-Oliver Pinellas Co,Fl 54 Oct-89 32 22 - 12p-7p 3.80 69.0 -
PinellasCo,FL 120 Oct 89 26 22 - 2p-7p 5'20 84.6
Ti ndale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 222 3 104 Avera eTri Len h: 3.93
ITE 2,160 10 Wei Med Aven eTri Len h: 4.34
Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 76.6
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.63
Movie Theater with Matinee(ITE LUC 444)
Total# #Tdp Length Percent New VMT Source
Location Size(Screens) Date in
Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time�Period Trip Length TripsPinellas Co,Fl 8 OR-89 151 116 113.10 2.70 77.0 235.13 Tndale-Oliver&Associates
PlellasCo,FL 12 Se-89 122 116 63.40 1.90 95.0 114.44 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 20 273 Ave Average Trip Length: 2.30
ITE 10 estimated Wei hted Ave eTri len h: 2.22
30 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 67.8
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 83.28
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate(6th): 153.33
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Td p Generation Rate: 106.63
Health Club(ITE LUC 492)
Tota if
#Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
Location
Lie 1:11,11:111:11110) Date Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Trips
Interviews Interviews Kimley-Ham&Associates
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 33 31 - 7.90 94.0
Total Size 33 Average Trip Len h: n/a
ITE 15 1 Pe rcent New Trip Average: 94.0
ITE Average Tri p Generation Rate: 32.93
Day Care Center(ITE LUC 565)
Total# #Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
Location Size(1,000 sf) Date Interviews Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Trips
Pinellas Co,FL 5.6 Aug- 94 66 66.99 7a-6p 1.90 70.0 89.10 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pinellas Co,FL 10.0 Sep-89 179 134 66.99 7a-6p 2.10 75.0 105.51 TKimlee-01orn&Assoo iatess
Tam a,FL - Mar-86 28 25 - 2.60 89.0 -
Total Size 15.6 2 301 Aver Trip len h: 2.20
ITE 35.0 7 Weighted Avera Tri Length: 2.03
Blended total 50.6 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 73.2
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 66.99
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 74.06
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 71.88
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-7 Impact Fee Update Study
204
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Nursing Home(ITE LUC 620)
Location Size(Beds) Date Total# #Trip Length Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New VMT
Interviews Interviews Trips Source
Lakeland,Fl 120 Mar-90 74 66 1 2.86 lla-4p 2.59 89.0 6.59 1 Tindale-Oliver&Assoc
Total Size 120 1 74 Avera e Trip Length: 2.59
ITE 714 6 Weighted Averae Trip Length: 2.59
Blended fatal 834 Weighted Percent New Tri p Average: 89.0
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.86
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2,74
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2,76
Clinic(ITE LUC 630)
[;2�;���Inte
Total
#Trip Length Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
iews Interviews Trips
14 572 37.03 7a-430# 5.10 93.0 175.63 Tindale-Oliver c Associates
SG Petersbur,Fl - Oct-89 280 252 - 9a-5 4.10 90.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 103.9 1 894 Avera eTri Len h: 4.60
ITE 224.0 2 Wei hted Avera e Trip Length: 5.10
327.9 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 93.0
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 37.03
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 31.45
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 33.22
General Office Building(ITE LUC 710)
Location Size(1,0000) Date Total# #Trip Length Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Trip length Percent New VMT Source
Interviews Interviews Trips
Sarasota Co,FL 14.3 lun-93 14 14 46.85 - 11.30 529.41 Sarasota Count
Gwinnett Co,GA 98.0 Dec-92 - - 4.30 - 5.40 Street Smarts
Gwinnett Co,GA 180.0 Dec-92 - - 3.60 - 5.90 - - Street Smarts
Pinellas Co,FL 187.0 Oct-89 431 388 18.49 7a Sp 6.30 90.0 104.84 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
St.Petersburg,FL 262.8 Sep-89 291 274 - 7a-Sp 3.40 94.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 742.1 5 736 Avera.Trip Length: 6.46
ITE 15,522.0 78 Wei Med Average TriLength: 5.15
Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 92.3
Medical-Dental Office Building(ITE LUC 720):10,000 sf or Less
Site Size(1,000 sry Tues.,Lan 11 Wedn.,Jan 12 - Thur., an 13 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE(per 1,000 sf)
IN f$40
IN O W IN Our IN Our IN OUT IN OUT TOTAL
Site 2.100 35 22 22 13 13 70 70 23.33 23.33 11.11 11.11 22.22
Site 3.000 40 52 52 53 53 145 145 48.33 48.33 16.11 16.11 32.22
Site 3 2.000 28 19 21 24 26 71 75 23.67 25.00 11.84 1250 24.34
Site 1.000 30 30 52 52 57 57 139 139 46.33 46.33 46.33 46.33 92.66
Sites 3.024 31 32 43 43 24 24 98 99 32.67 33.00 10.80 10.91 21.71
Site 6 1.8601 221 241 191 17 11 11 52 52 17.33 17.33 9.32 9.32 18.64
Average
17.59 17.71 35.30
Average(excluding Site 4) 11.841 11.991 23.83
Medical-Dental Office Building(ITE LUC 720)
Location Size1,000 sf Date Total# #Tdp Length Percent New
Size(
) Interviews Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Trips VMT Source
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 33 26 - - 6.00 79.0 - Kimley-Horn&Associates
Palm Harbor,FL 14.6 Oct 89 104 76 33.98 9a-5p 6.30 73.0 156.27 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
St.Petersburg,FL - Nov49 34 30 57.20 9.4p 1.20 88.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Cc,FL 58.4 May-96 390 349 28.529a-6p 6.47 89.5 365.09 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Cc,FL 28.0 May-96 202 189 49.75 9a-6p 6.06 93.8 282.64 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 11.0 Oct-97 - 186 49.50 9a-5p 4.60 92.1 209.67 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 28.0 Oct-97 - 186 31.00 9a-Sp 3.60 81.6 91.04 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Cc,FL 30.4 Oct-97 - 324 39.80 9aSP3.30 83.5 103.68 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Citrus Co,FL 38.9 Oct-03 - 168 32.26 8-6p 6.80 97.1 213.03 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Citrus Co,FL 10.0 Nav-03 - 340 40.56 8630p 6.20 92.4 232.33 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Citw5Co,FL 5.3 Dec-03 - 20 29.36 8-5p 5.25 95.2 146.78 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Orange Co,FL 50.6 - - 26.72 - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 23.5 - - 16.58 - - - Orange County
Total Size 298.6 11 763 Average TriLength: 5.07
ITE 450.0 10 Weighted Aver e Trip Length: 5.55
Blended total 748.6 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 88.9
Average Trip Generation Rate: 32.59
ITEAverage Trip Generation Rate: 36.13
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Ave rage Trip Generation Rate: 34.72
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-8 Impact Fee Update Study
Z10
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Business Park(ITE LUC 770)
Location 5i re(1,000 sf) Date Total If #Trip Length Trip Gen Rate Time eryPeriod Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
Intiews Interviews Trips
Collier Co,FL 14.1 May-99 - 55 33.48 8a-6p 3.60 72.7 87.62 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Cc,FL 66.0 May-99 - 43 11.53 Sa-6p 5.70 79.0 51.92
Collier Co,FL 211.1 May-99 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
- 284 17.91 Sa-6 5.40 93.0 89.94 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 291.2 3 Average TriLength: 4.90
ITE 62_`8.0 16 Wel kited Avero e Trip Length: 5.39
Blended total 6,579.2 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 88.8
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 17.22
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 12.44
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 12.65
Shopping Center(ITE LUC 820)
Location Size(1,000sf) Date Total# #Trip Length Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Vim,
Interviews Interviews Trips Source
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 527 348 - - 66.0 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 170 - - 1.70 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 354 269 - - - 76.0 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 144 - - - 2050 - - Kimley-Horn&Associates
St.Petersburg,FL 1,192.0 Aug 89 384 298 - 11a-7p 3.60 78.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
St.Petersburg,FL 132.3 Sep-89 400 368 77.00 10a-7p 1.80 92.0 127.51 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lnedin,L 425.0 Aug-89 160 120 26.73 10a-6p 2.30 75.0 46.11 Tindale-Oliver Dunedin,FL 80.5 Sep-S9 276 210
81.48 9a-5p 1.40 76.0 86.69 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pinellas Park,Fl 696.0 Sep-89 485 388 - 9Tiip 3.20 80.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Seminole,FL 425.0 Oct-89 674 586 - - 87,0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hillsborough Co,FL 134.0 lul-91 - - - - 1.30 74.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hillsborough Co,FL 151.0 Jul-91 73.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL - Aug-91 68 64 - - 3.33 94.1 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL - Aug-91 208 154 - - 164 74.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Sarasota/Bradenton,FL 109.0 Sep-92 300 185 - 12a-6p - 61.6 King Engineering Associates,Inc.
Ocala,FL 133.4 Sep-92 300 192 12a-6p - 64.0 King Engineering Associates,Inc.
Gwinnett Co,GA 99.1 Dec-92 - 46.00 3.20 70.0 103.04 Street Smarts
Gwinnett Co,GA 314.7 Dec-92 - - 27.00 - 8.50 84.0 192.78 StreetSmans
Sarasota Co,FL 110.0 jun 93 58 58 122.14 - 3.20 - Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 146.1 jun-9365 65 51.53 - 2.80 - Sarasota County
Sarasota Co,FL 157.5 Jun-93 57 57 79.79 3.40 - Sarasota County
Sarasota Ca,FL 191.0 Jun-93 62 62 66.79 5.90 - Sarasota County
Hernando Co,FL 107.8 May-96 608 331 77.60 9a-6p 4.68 54.5 197.85 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Cc,FL 88.0 Oct-97 - - 73.50 9a-Sp 1.80 57.1 75.56 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 1919
Oct 97 - 72.00 9a-5p 140 50.9 87.97 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Charlotte Co,FL 51.3 Oct-97 - - 43.00 9a-Sp 2.70 51.8 60.08 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 67.8 Apr-01246 177 102.60 3.40 71.2 248.37 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 72.3 Apr-OS 444 376 65.30 4.50 59.0 173ive
.37 Tindale-Olr&Associates
Pasco Cc,FL 65.6 Apr-02 222 - 145.64 9a-5p 1.46 46.9 99.62 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 75.8 Apr-02 134 38.23 9a-Sp 2.36 58.2 52.52 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates
Citrus Co,FL 185.0 Oct-03 - 784 55.84 8a-6p 2.40 88.1 118.05 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Citrus Cc,FL 91.3 Nov-03 390 54.50 8a-6p 1.60 88.0 76.77 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Bozeman,MT 104.3 Dec-06 359 359 46.96 3.35 49.0 77.08 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Bozeman,PAT159.9 Dec-06 502 502 56.49 1.56 54.0 47.59 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Bozeman,MT 35.9 Dec-06 329 329 69.30 1.39 74.0 71.28 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 5,757.5 7,536 Average TriLength: n a
Weighted Average Trip Length: n/a
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-9 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Figure B-1
Shopping Center(LUC 820)—Florida Curve Trip Length Regression
4.00
3.50
3.00 ♦ �•♦♦
♦♦�
2.50
m 2.00
c
a
0 1.50
L
1.00
0.50
0.00
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Square Footage
Source: Regression analysis based on FL Studies data for LUC 820
Figure B-2
Shopping Center(LUC 820)—Florida Curve Percent New Trips Regression
90%
80%
70% ��♦♦•
L 60%
50%
Z
41
40%
v
u
a 30%
20%
10%
0%
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Square Footage
Source: Regression analysis based on FL Studies data for LUC 820
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-10 Impact Fee Update Study
21 7
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
New Car Sales(ITE LUC 841)
Location Size(1,000 sf) Date Total# #Tdp Length Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Peri New
Interviews Interviews ps VMT Source
St.Petersburg,FL 43.0
Oct 89 152 120 -
9a Sip 4.70 79.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Clearwater,FL 43.0 Oct-89 136 106 29A0 9a-Sp 4.50 78.0 103.19 Tindale-Oliver&Associate s
Orange Cc,FL 116.7 - 22.18 - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 99.8 - - 13.45 - - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 39.1 - - 10.48 - - - Orange County
Oran a Co,FL 66.3 - - - 28.50 - Or a Count
Orange Co,FL 46.7 - - - #0.34 - - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 34.4 _ - _ 23,45 Orange County
Orange Co,FL 13.8 - - - 35.75 - - - - Orange County
Total Size 459.7 8 288 Average TriLength: 4.60
ITE 570.0 15 Wel kited Aver e Trip Length: 4.60
Blended total 1,029.7 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 78.5
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 23.22
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 32.30
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 28.25
Supermarket(ITE LUC 850)
Location Sixe(1,000 sf) Date Total# #Tri p Length Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New yMT Source
Interviews Interviews Trips
Palm Harbor,FL 62.0 Au-89 163 62 106.26 9a-4 2.03 56.0 123.77 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 62.0 1 163 Average Trip Length: 2.08
ITE 156.0 4 Wei kited Average TriLength: 2.08
Blended total 218.0 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 56.0
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 106.26
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 102.24
Blend of FI-Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 103.38
Service Station w/Convenience Market(ITE LUC 853)
Location Size(1,000 sf) Date Total# #Tdp Length Trip Gen Rate Tl me Period Trip Trips
Pence nt New
Interviews Interviews VMT Source
Tam a,FL - Mar-86 72 - - - 2.00 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 1.1 lun-91 77 20 544.80 24hr. 0.89 26.0 126.07 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 2.1 Jun-91 66 24 997.60 24hr. 1.67 36.4 506.42 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Co,FL 4.4 jun-91 85 25 486.70 48hrs. 1.06 29.4 151.68 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL - Aug 91 96 38 - - 1.19 39.6 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL - Aug 91 78 16 - - 1.06 20.5 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Tampa,FL 2.310/13115/92 239 74 - 24hr. 1.06 31.1 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Ellenton,FL 3.3 10/20-22/92 124 44 24hr. 0.96 35.3 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Tampa,FL 3.8 11/10-12/92 142 23 - 24hr. 3.13 16.4 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 2.5 Apr0287 - 719.79 24hr. 1.62 3208 322.19 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 2.5Apr-02 23 - 610AS 24hr. 1.77 11.7 126.61 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Marion Cc,Fl 3.0 A i-02 59 - 606.02 24hr. 0.83 32.6 195.00 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Total Size 25.1 9 1,148 Aansra,eTri Len h: 1.44
ITE 30.0 10 WelghteclAveraigeTri Len h: 1.51
Blended Total 55.1 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 27.7
45.6 15.6 Average Trip Generation Rate: 639.68
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 845.60
Blend of Fl-Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 775.14
Furniture Store(ITE LUC 890)
Location Sixe(1,000 sf) Date Total# #Trip Length Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
Interviews Interviews Trips
Largo,FL 15.0 7/28-30/92 64 34 - - 4.63 52.5 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Tampa,FL 16.9 Ju1-92 68 39 - - 7.38 55.7 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 31.9 2 132 AverageIrl Length: 6.01
ITE 897.0 13 Weighted Avera eTri Length: 6.09
Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 54.2
Average Trip Generation Rate: -
ITE Average TripGeneration Rate: 5.06
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-11 Impact Fee Update Study
Z13
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Drive-In Bank(ITE LUC 912)
Location Size(1,000 sf) Date Total# #Trip Length Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New VMi Source
Interviews Interviews Trips
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 77 - - 2,40 - - Kimley-Horn&Associates
Tampa,FL - Mar 86 211 - - 54.0 - Kimley-Horn&Associates
Clearwater,FL 0.4 Aug-89 113 52 - 9a-6p 5.20 46.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Largo,FL 2.0 Sep-89 129 94 - - 1.60 73.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Seminole,FL 4.5 Oct-89 - - - - Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 2.3 Jun9169 29 - 24hr. 1.33 420 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Co,FL 3.1 Jun-91 47 32 - 24hr. 1.75 68.1 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 2.5 Jul-91 57 26 - 48hrs. 2.70 45.6 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL Aug-91 162 96 - 24hr. 0.88 59.3 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL - Aug-91 116 54 - - 1.58 46.6 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL Aug-91 142 68 - 2.08 47.9 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Cc,FL 5.4 May-96 164 41 - 9a-6p 2.77 24.7
Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 2.4 Apr-02 70 - - 24hr. 3.55 54.6 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Marion Co,FL 2.7 May-02 50 - 246.66 24hr. 2.66 40.5 265.44 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Total Size 25.2 9 1,407 erage Trip Length: 2.38
ITE 21.0 7 Wel hted Avera eTrip Length: 2.46
Blended total 46.2 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 46.2
23,7 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 246.66
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 148.15
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 159.34
Restaurant(ITE LUC 932)
Location Size1,000 sf Date Total# #Trip Length Percent New
Size(
) Interviews Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Trips VMT Source
Hernando Co,FL 6.2 ay 96 242 175 187.51 9a-6p 2.76 72.5 375.00 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 8.2 May-96 154 93 102.71 9a-6p 4.15 60.2 256.43 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
St.Petersburg,FL 5.0 Oct-89 74 68 132.60 1130.7p 2.00 92.0 243.98 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Kenneth City,FL 5.2 Oct-89 236 176 12 7.88 4p-730p 2.30 75.0 220.59 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Cc,FL 5.2 Apr-02 114 88 82.47 9a-61, 3.72 77.2 236.81 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Cc,FL 5.8 Apr-02 182 102 116.97 9a-6p 3.49 56.0 228.77 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Oran a Co,FL 8.9 - - 52.69 - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 11.3 - - - 62.12 - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 6.7 - - 82.58 - - - Orange County
Orange Cc,FL 11.4 - - - 91.67 Orange County
Orange Co,FL 11.3 - - - 95.33 - - - Orange County
Orange Cc,FL 7.2 - - - 98.06 - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 5.5 - 100.18 - - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 9.7 - - - 105.84 Orange Count
Orange Co,FL 4.6 - - 129.23 Orange Count
Orange Co,FL 7.0 - - - 126.40 1 Orange Count
Orange Cc,FL 9.7 - - 132.32 - - Orange County
Orange Cc,FL 5.0 - 135.68 Orange Count
Orange Co,FL 5.6 - - - 145.59 Orange Count
Oran a Co,FL 7.4 - - - 147.44 - - Orange County
Orange Co,FL 5.9 - - - 147.74 - - - Orange County
Total Size 152.8 21 1,102 -AverageTrl Len h: 3.07
ITE 98.0 14 Wei hied Ave eTd len h: 3.17
Blended total 250.8 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 70.8
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 109.84
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 127.15
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 116.60
Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive Thru(ITE LUC 934)
Location Size 11,01))sf) Date Total# #Trip Length Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
In Interviews Trips
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 61 - - - 2.70 Kimley-Horn&Associates
Tampa,FL - Mar-86 306 - 65.0 Kimle-Horn&Associates
Pinellas Cc,FL 2.20 Aug 89 81 48 502.80 11a 2p 1.70 59.0 504.31 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pinellas Co,FL 4.30 Oct89456 260 660.40 1day 2.30 57.0 865.78 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Tarpon Springs,FL - Oct-89 233 114 7a-7p 3.60 49.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Cc,FL 1.60 Jun-91 60 32 962.50 48hrs. 0.91 53.3 466.84 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Marion Co,FL 4.00 jun-91 75 46 625.00 1 48hrs. 1.54 61.3 590.01 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FL - Aug-91 66 44 1.91 66.7 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier Co,FIL - Aug-91 118 40 1.17 33.9 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 5.43 May-96 136 82 311.83 9a-6p 1.68 60.2 315.27 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Hernando Co,FL 3.13 May-96 168 82 547.34 9a-6p 1.59 48.8 425.04 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 2.20 A r-01 376 252 934.30 2.50 74.6 1742.47 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 3.20 Apr-01 171 182 654.90 4.10 47.8 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Lake Co,FL 3.80 Apr-01 188 137 353.70 3.30 70.8 826.38 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 2.66 Apr-02 100 46 283.12 9a-6p 5.10 46.0 - Ti ndale-Oliver&Associates
Pasco Co,FL 2.96 Apr-02 486 164 515.32 9a-6 2.72 33.7 472.92 Tindale-Oliver&Associate s
Pasco Co,FL 4.42 Ar-02 168 120 759.24 9a-6 1.89 71.4 1024.99 Tindale-Oliver&Associate s
Orange Cc,FL 8.93 - - 377.00 Oran a Count
Total Size 48.8 13 4,463 Average Trip Length: 2.42
ITE 63.0 21 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.0s
Blended total 111.8 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 57.9
34.0 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 530.19
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 496.12
Blend of F1.5tudies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 511.00
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-12 Impact Fee Update Study
211
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Automobile Care Center(ITE LUC 942)
Total# #Trip Length Percent New
Location Size(1,000 sf) Date Interviews Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Trips VMT Source
Jacksonville,FL 2.3 2/3-4/90 124 94 - 9a-Sp 3.07 76.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Jacksonville,FL 2.3 2/3-4/90 110 74 - 9a-5 2.96 67.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Jacksonville,FL 2.4 2/3 Ti
-4/90 132 87 9a 5p 2.32 66.0 ndale-Oliver&Associates
Lakeland,FL 5.2 Mar9024 14 - So4p1.36 59.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Largo,FL 5.5 Sep-89 34 30 37.64 90-5p 2.40 88.0 79.50 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Oran a Co,FL 25.0 Nov-92 41 39 - 2-6 4.60 - - LCE,Inc.
Lakeland,FL Mar-90 54 42 - 9a-4p 2.44 78.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 42.6 6 519 Avera eTri Length: 2.74
ITE 102.0 61 Weighted Ave eTri Len h: 3.62
Blended total 144.6 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 72.2
107.5 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 37.64
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 31.10
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 31.43
Service Station with and w/o Car Wash(ITE LUC 944&946)
Total# ,Trip# Length Trip Gen Rate Ti me Period Trip length Percent New VMT Source
Location Size(1,00D sf) Date Interviews nterviews Trips
ar o,FL 0.6 Nov-89 70 14 Bam-5 m 1.90 23.0
I - Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier County,FL - Aug- 168 40 - 1.01 23.8 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 0.6 1 238 Avera eTri len h: 1.46
ITE LUC 944(vfp) 48.0 6 Weighted Average TriLength: 1.90
ITE LUC 946(vfp) 120.0 10 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 23.0
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate-per fuel position(LUC 944): 168.56
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate-per fuel position LUC 946): 152.84
Blended ITE Average Trip Generation Rate-per fuel position: 157.33
Self-Service Car Was (ITE LUC 947)
T
otalength Tri Gen Rate Time Pedod Trip Length Percent New VMT Source
Location Size(Bays) DateP Tri s
iews
Lar o,FL 10 Nov-89 - 8am-5 m 2.00 76.0 - Tindale-Oliver
Clearwater,FL Nov 898 - 10am-5 m 1.30 61.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associ ates
Collier,FL 11 __Dec 0930.24 - 2.50 57.0 Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Collier,FL 8 Jan 0922.75 - 1.96 72.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates
Total Size 29 3Ave eTri Len h: 1.94
Total Size(TGR) 19 2Wel Med Ave eTri len h: 2.18
ITE 5 1 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 67.7
Blended total 24 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 27.09
ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 108.00
Blend of FL Studies and ITE Ave rage Trip Generation Rate: 43.94
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 B-13 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Design
County Roadways
The design cost factor for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction
cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the design-to-
construction cost ratios for county road unit costs in previously completed impact fee
studies throughout Florida. For county roadways, the design factors ranged from 6 percent
to 14 percent, with a weighted average of 10 percent. For purposes of this update study,
the design cost for county roads was calculated at 10 percent of the construction cost per
lane mile (see Table C-10 for additional information).
Table C-2
Design Cost Adjustment—County Roads
Design Cost per Section Design Weighted
Road Type (1) (2) Design Cost per
Lane Mile Distribution Lane Mile(3)
Urban Design $180,000 349/o $61,000
Rural Design $149,0001 66% $98,000
Weighted Average Design Cost per Lane Mile $159,000
(1) Design cost is estimated at 10%of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in
Table C-10(Item a).
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17(Items c and d)
(3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design
weight(Item 2)for each design type and added together.
StateRoadways
The design cost factor for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction
cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the design-to-
construction cost ratios for state road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies
throughout Florida. For state roadways, the design factors ranged from 10 percent to 14
percent, with a weighted average of 11 percent. For purposes of this update study, the
design cost for state roads was calculated at 11 percent of the construction cost per lane
mile. See Table C-10 for additional information.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-2 Impact Fee Update Study
z ,g
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-3
Design Cost Adjustment—State Roads
Design
•... Type (1) (2) Design Cost per
Lane Mile Distribution Lane Mile(3)
fRr
an Design $220,000 34% $75,000
alDesi66% $121,000ighted Average Design Cost per Lane Mile $196,000
(1) Design cost is estimated at 11%of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in
Table C-10(Item b).
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17(Items c and d)
(3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design
weight(Item 2)for each design type and added together.
Right-of-Way
The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along a corridor that was necessary
to have sufficient cross-section width to widen an existing road or, in the case of new
construction, build a new road.
County Roadways
To determine a ROW acquisition cost per lane mile for county roads, TOA conducted a
review of recently completed ROW acquisitions and current ROW estimates along capacity
expansion projects in Indian River County and also reviewed ROW estimates from recent
transportation impact fee studies from other counties in Florida. For impact fee purposes,
the ROW cost for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per
lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the ROW-to-construction cost
ratios for county road unit costs from recent local projects and in previously completed
impact fee studies throughout Florida. For county roadways in Indian River County, the
ROW factors ranged from 6 percent to 150 percent, with a weighted average of 41 percent,
as shown in Table C-11. This factor is consistent with the ratio of ROW to construction cost
observed in other Florida jurisdictions, as shown in Table C-12. For purposes of this update
study, the ROW cost for county roads was calculated at 41 percent of the construction cost
per lane mile.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-3 Impact Fee Update Study
?i4
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-4
Right-of-Way Cost Adjustment—County Roads
ROW Cost per Section Design Weighted ROW
Road Type (1) (2) Cost per Lane
Lane Mile Distribution Mile(3)
Urban Design $738,000 34% $251,000
Rural Design $613,000 66% $405,000
Weighted Average ROW Cost per Lane Mile $656,000
(1) ROW cost is estimated at 41% of construction cost based on recent IRC
improvements in Table C-11(Item 2).
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17(Items c and d)
(3) ROW cost per lane mile(Item 1)multiplied by the associated section design weight
(Item 2)for each design type and added together.
State Roadways
Due to a lack of local acquisition data, the ROW cost for state roads was estimated as a
percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a
review of the ROW-to-construction cost ratios for state road unit costs in previously
completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For state roadways, the ROW factors
ranged from 20 percent to 71 percent, with a weighted average of 44 percent. For
purposes of this update study, the ROW cost for state roads was calculated at 44 percent of
the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-12 for additional information).
Table C-5
Right-of-Way Cost Adjustment—State Roads
ROW Cost per Section Design Weighted ROW
Road Type (1) (2) Cost per Lane
Lane Mile Distribution Mile(3)
Urban Design $880,000 34% $299,000
Rural Design $730,000 66% $482,000
Weighted Average ROW Cost per Lane Mile $781,000
(1) ROW cost is estimated at 44%of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in
Table C-12(Item b).
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17(Items c and d)
(3) ROW cost per lane mile(Item 1)multiplied by the associated section design weight
(Item 2)for each design type and added together.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-4 Impact Fee Update Study
2 LD
Indian River County ) Impact Fee Update Study
Construction
County Roadways
A review of construction cost data for recent local county roadway capacity expansion
projects identified 12 improvements over the past five years. These 12 improvements
(detailed in Table C-13) had a weighted average construction cost of approximately $1.80
million per lane mile. In addition to local data, a review of recently bid projects throughout
the state of Florida was conducted. As shown in Table C-14, a total of 49 projects from 13
different counties provided a weighted average cost per lane mile of $2.18 million per lane
mile. Based on this review, it was concluded that construction costs in Indian River County
are lower than the costs observed elsewhere in the state. More specifically, roadways costs
in Indian River County are approximately 83 percent of costs observed statewide. Due to
the large amount of local data, the county roadway construction cost used to calculate the
transportation impact fee was estimated at $1.80 million per lane mile for urban-design
county roadways.
Table C-6
Construction Cost Adjustment—County Roads
Construction Section Design Weighted
Road Type Cost per Lane . (2) Constr.Cost per
Mile(l) Distribution Lane Mile(3)
Urban Design $1,800,000 34% $612,000
Rural Design $1,494,000 66% $986,000
Weighted Average Construction Cost per Lane Mile $1,598,000
(1) Source: Table C-13. Rural design is estimated at 83% of urban design costs (see
Table C-1)
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17(Items c and d)
(3) Construction cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section
design weight(Item 2)for each design type and added together.
State Roadways
A review of construction cost data for recent local state roadway capacity expansion
projects identified three improvements with an average construction cost of approximately
$2.95 million per lane mile.
• SR 5 (US 1) from S. of Oslo Rd to S. of Indian River Bend
• SR 60(Osceola Blvd)from W. of 82nd Ave to 66th Ave/CR 505
• SR 60 (Osceola Blvd) from W. of 1-95 to W. of 82nd Ave/CR 609
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-5 Impact Fee Update Study
2-LI
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
In addition to looking at local data, a review of recently bid projects located throughout the
state of Florida was conducted. As shown in Table C-15, a total of 52 projects (including the
three projects in Indian River County) from 26 different counties estimated a weighted
average cost per lane mile of$2.44 million per lane mile.
Due to the lower construction costs observed between local county roads and statewide
county improvements, and the small sample size of local state road improvements, the
estimated state road construction cost was adjusted downward to provide a conservative
estimate for use in the impact fee calculation. This adjustment was based on the ratio of
local county roadway improvements to statewide county roadway improvements, which, as
previously mentioned, is 83 percent. Therefore,the weighted average construction cost per
lane mile for all state road improvements (including local and statewide data) was adjusted
by 83 percent. Based on this analysis, a construction cost of$2.00 million per lane mile for
urban-design state roadways was used to calculate the transportation impact fee for Indian
River County.
Table C-7
Construction Cost Adjustment—State Roads
Construction Section Design Weighted
Road Type Cost per Lane (2) Constr.Cost per
Mile(l) Distribution Lane Mile(3)
Urban Design $2,000,000 34%1 $680,000
Rural Design $1,660,0001 66%1 $1,096,000
Weighted Average Construction Cost per Lane Mile 1 $1,776,000
(1) Source:Table C-15. Rural design is estimated at 83%of urban design costs
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17(Items c and d)
(3) Construction cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section
design weight(Item 2)for each design type and added together.
Construction Engineering/Inspection
County Roadways
The CEI cost factor for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost
per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the CEI-to-construction cost
ratios for county road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout
Florida. For county roadways, the CEI factors ranged from 4 percent to 14 percent, with a
weighted average of 9 percent. For purposes of this update study, the CEI cost for county
roads was calculated at 9 percent of the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-16 for
additional information).
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-6 Impact Fee Update Study
Z2.2
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-8
CEI Cost Adjustment—County Roads
SectionWeighted CEI
CEI Cost per Lane
Road Type Mile(i) Distribution(2) Mile(3)
Urban Design $162,000 34% $55,000
Rural Design $134,000 66% $88,000
Weighted Average CEI Cost per Lane Mile $143,000
(1) CEI cost is estimated at 9% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in
Table C-16(Item a).
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17(Items c and d)
(3) CEI cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight
(Item 2)for each design type and added together.
State Roadways
The CEI cost factor for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost
per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the CEI-to-construction cost
ratios for state road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout
Florida. For state roadways, the CEI factors ranged from 8 percent to 17 percent, with a
weighted average of 11 percent. For purposes of this update study, the CEI cost for state
roads was calculated at 11 percent of the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-16 for
additional information).
Table C-9
CEI Cost Adjustment—State Roads
CEI Cost per Lane Section Design Weighted CEI
Road Type (1) (2) Cost per Lane
Mile Distribution Mile(3)
Urban Design $220,000 34% $75,000
Rural Design $183,000 66% $121,000
Weighted Average CEI Cost per Lane Mile $196,000
(1) CEI cost is estimated at 11% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in
Table C-16(Item b).
(2) Source:Appendix C,Table C-17(Items c and d)
(3) CEI cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight
(Item 2)for each design type and added together.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-7 Impact Fee Update Study
'Z.23
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-10
Design Cost Factor-County&State Roads
County Roadways state Roadways
Year County Design Constr. Design Ratio Design Constr. Design Ratio
2006 Collier $323,639 $2,558,5461 13% $349,643 $3,385,978 10%
2006 Citrus $361,774 $2,584,0991 14% $400,432 $2,860,227 14%
2006 Highlands $235,030 $1,678,785 14% $347,326 $2,480,900 14%
2006 Marion $185,333 $1,941,244 10% $154,643 $1,430,919 11%
2007 Pasco $246,324 $3,079,051 8% $427,112 $3,050,799 14%
2007 Lake $232,882 $2,911,021 8% $318,412 $3,184,125 10%
2007 Flagler $174,000 $1,740,000 10% - - n/a
2007 Volusia $291,696 $2,651,778 11% $309,526 $3,095,258 10%
2008 Leon $212,800 $2,660,000 8% $372,130 $3,383,000 11%
2008 Sumter $178,960 $2,237,000 8% $238,000 $2,380,000 10%
2009 Collier $217,000 $3,100,000 7% $320,000 $3,200,000 10%
2009 Polk $95,400 $1,590,000 6% $217,000 $2,170,000 10%
2009 Hillsborough/Tampa $308,000 $2,800,000 11% $420,000 $3,500,000 12%
2010 Collier $119,560 $1,708,000 7% $241,800 $2,418,000 10%
2011 Sarasota/North Port $240,000 $2,400,000 10% $200,000 $2,000,000 10%
2012 Osceola $371,196 $2,651,400 14% $313,258 $2,847,800 11%
2012 Orange $264,000 $2,400,000 11% - - n/a
2012 City of Orlando $288,000 $2,400,000 12% $319,0001 $2,900,000 11%
Average $241,422 $2,393,940 10.0 $309,2681 $2,767,938 11%
(a) (b)
Source:Recent impact fee studies constructed throughout Florida
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
N
June 2014 C-8 Impact Fee Update Study
N
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-11
Right-of-Way Factor—Recent County Road Improvements in Indian River County
Section Length Lanes Lane Right-of- Construction ROW/
Project# Description From To Bid Year Status Feature Design (Miles) Added Miles Way Cost Costs Constr.(Z)
Added
05013 17th Lane SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 1 2008 1 Completed 2 to 3 Lanes Urban 0.52 1 0.52 $525,000
06026 20th Ave SW 21st St SW 17th Lane SW 2008 Completed 1U to 2D Lanes Urban 0.27 2 0.54 $1,886,715
06026 20th Ave SW 25th St SW 21st St SW 2009 Completed 0 to 2 Lanes Urban 0.25 2 0.50
06047 College Lane Rd Extension IRSC 66th Ave 2009 Completed Oto 2 Lanes Urban 0.50 2 1.00 $1,700,000
01014 16th St 66th Ave 74th Ave 2009 Completed Oto 2 Lanes Urban 1.27 2 2.53 $664,258 $3,109,321 21%
06021 WAve
16th St SR 60 2009 Completed Oto 3 Lanes Urban 0.51 3 1.53 $3,758,300 $2,504,423 150%
02025 Kings Hwy Lateral H Canal 2010 Completed Oto 4 Lanes Urban 2.04 4 8.14 $3,221,638 $7,000,000 46%
02025 Lateral H Canal Indian River Blvd 2010 Completed 0 to 4 Lanes Urban 0.50 4 2.00 $1,500,000 $7,605,993 20%
06018 .II 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2011 Completed 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.20 3 3.60 $4,032,257 $4,531,822 89%
05004 h.III 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2012 Ongoing 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.15 2 2.30 $245,445 $3,812,202 6%
02031 4th St 16th St 2012 Ongoing 0 to 2U/2D Rural 1.50 2/3 5.50 $765,946 $6,628,935 12%06040 SR 60 49th St
2012 Ongoing 2to 4 Lanes I Urban 3.05 2 6.10 $20,773,3891 51%
Total 12.75 34.26 $24,755,481 $60,077,800 41%
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Right-of-way costs divided by construction costs
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-9 Impact Fee Update Study
N
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-12
Right-of-Way Factor—County&State Roads
RoadwaysCounty Roadways State
Year County ROW Constr. Design Ratio ROW Constr. Design Ratio
2006 Collier $1,751,790 $2,558,546 68% $1,751,790 $3,385,978 52%
2006 Citrus $784,599 $2,584,099 30% $949,979 $2,860,227 33%
2006 Highlands $468,853 $1,678,785 28% $507,500 $2,480,900 20%
2006 Marion $1,005,123 $1,941,244 52% $868,908 $1,430,919 61%
2007 Pasco $814,517 $3,079,051 26% $1,560,714 $3,050,799 51%
2007 Lake $599,185 $2,911,021 21% $1,462,133 $3,184,125 46%
2007 Flagler $460,000 $1,740,000 26% - - n/a
2007 Volusia $858,109 $2,651,778 32% $954,543 $3,095,258 31%
2008 Leon $1,120,000 $2,660,000 42% $1,363,000 $3,383,000 40%
2008 Sumter $802,000 $2,237,000 36% $1,400,000 $2,380,000 59%
2009 Collier $1,300,000 $3,100,000 42% $1,300,000 $3,200,000 41%
2009 Polk $1,491,000 $1,590,000 94% $550,000 $2,170,000 25%
2009 Hillsborough/Tampa $1,500,000 $2,800,000 54% $2,500,000 $3,500,000 71%
2010 Collier $901,000 $1,708,000 53% $901,000 $2,418,000 37%
2011 Sarasota/North Port $620,000 $2,400,000 26% $800,000 $2,000,000 40%
2012 Osceola $1,087,074 $2,651,400 41% $1,167,598 $2,847,800 41%
2012 Orange $1,080,000 $2,400,000 45% - - n/a
2012 City of Orlando $1,080,000 $2,400,000 45% $1,305,000 $2,900,000 45%
Average $984,625 $2,393,940 41% $1,208,885 $2,767,938 449/o
(a) (b)
Source: Recent impact fee studies constructed throughout Florida
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
N
June 2014 C-10 Impact Fee Update Study
N
r
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-13
Construction Cost—Recent County Road Improvements in Indian River County
Section Length Lanes Lane Right-of- Construction Construction
Project# Description From To Bid Year Status Feature Design (Miles) Added Miles Way Cost Costs Cost per Lane
Added Mile
05013 17th Lane SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 2008 Completed 2 to 3 Lanes Urban 0.52 1 0.52 $525,000 $1,009,615
06026 20th Ave SW 21st St SW 17th Lane SW 2008 Completed 1U to 2D Lanes Urban 0.27 M21.00
$1,886,715 $3,773,430
06026 20th Ave SW 25th St SW 21st St SW 2009 Completed 0 to 2 Lanes Urban 0.25
06047 College Lane Rd Extension IRSC 66th Ave 2009 Completed Oto 2 Lanes Urban 0.50 $1,700,000 $1,700,000
01014 16th St 66th Ave 74th Ave 2009 Completed Oto 2 Lanes Urban 1.27 $664,258 $3,109,321 $1,228,981
06021 66th Ave 16th St SR 60 2009 Completed 0to3Lanes Urban 0.51 $3,758,300 $2,504,423 $1,636,878
02025 53rd St Kings Hwy Lateral H Canal 2010 Completed Oto 4 Lanes Urban 2.04 4 8.14 $3,221,638 $7,000,000 $859,951
02025 53rd St Lateral H Canal Indian River Blvd 2010 Completed Oto 4 Lanes Urban 0.50 4 2.00 $1,500,000 $7,605,993 $3,802,997
06018 Oslo Rd,Ph.II 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2011 Completed 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.20 3 3.60 $4,032,257 $4,531,822 $1,258,839
05004 Oslo Rd,Ph.III 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2012 Lngoii 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.15 2 2.30 $245,445 $3,812,202 $1,657,479
02031 66th Ave 4th St 16th St 2012 Oto 2U/2D Rural 1.50 2/3 5.50 $765,946 $6,628,935 $1,205,261
06040 66th Ave SR 60 49th St 2012 2 to 4 Lanes Urban 3.05 2 6.10 $10,567,637 520,773,389 $3,405,474
12.75 34.26 $24,755,481 $60,077,800 $1,753,584
Total
Used in Impact Fee Study:(3) $1,800,000
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Right-of-way costs divided by construction costs
(3) The weighted average construction cost per lane mile was rounded for use in the impact fee calculation
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
N June 2014 C-11 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-14
Construction Cost-County Road Improvements from Other Jurisdictions throughout Florida L nes Lane Miles Construction construction Cost
County District
Description ••
Collier 1 Santa Barbara Blvd Ext Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Davis Blvd 2008 Bid Oto 6 Urban 2.00 6 12.00 512,035,894 $1,002,991
Polk 1 Silver Connector Rd E.F.Griffin Rd us 98 2008 Bid Oto2 Urban 0.33 2 $2,364,368
0.66 51,560,483
Polk 1 County Line Rd Ewe 11 Ave Pipkin Rd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.20 2 2.40 53,993,892 $1,664,122
Volusia 5 Debary Ave Deltona Blvd Providence Blvd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.84 2 3.68 $7,405,914 $2,012,477
Volusia 5 S.Williamson Blvd(Ph.II) S.of Sabal Creek Blvd N.of Moody Bridge 2008 Bid 2to 4 Urban 1.91 2 3.82 511,109,225 $2,908,174
Lake 5 CR 466(Segment A) U5301 CR 319 2006 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.00 2 2.00 $4,062,660 $2,031,330
Hillsborough 7 40th St River Pines Apts Humphrey St 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.95 2 1.90 $5,154,862 $2,713,085
Hillsborough 7 Race TrackM(Ph.l) Douglas Rd Linebaugh Ave 2008 Bid 2to6 Urban 1.01 4 4.04 $10,099,911 52,499,978
Osceola 5 John Young Pkwy Carroll Orange Co.Line 2008 Bid Oto 6 Urban 0.85 2 1.70 $3,230,000 $1,900,000
Orange 5 CR 535(Segments C and E) Ficquette Rd Butler Ridge Or 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.10 2 2.20 $3,693,616 $1,678,916
Orange 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd SR 417 2006 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 0.40 2 0.80 $2,803,484 $3,504,355
Oran e 5 Destination Pkwy International Or Tradeshow Blvd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.71 2 1.42 53,017,443 $2,124,960
Lee 1 Gladiolus Or(Ph.I) A&W Bulb Rd Winkler Rd 2008 Bid 2t 4/6 Urban 1.94 2/4 5.44 513,971,509 $2,568,292
Lee 1 GI adiol us Or(Ph.ll) Pine Ridge Rd A&W Bulb Rd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.02 2 2.04 $6,748,642 $3,308,158
Charlotte 1 Toledo Blade Corridor North Port U541 2008 Bid 2to4 Suburban 1.20 2 2.40 $3,174,852 $1,322,855
Orange 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Hiawassee Rd Clark 2009 Bid 2to 4 Urban 2.50 2 5.00 510,182,738 $2,036,548
Orange 5 Woodbury Rd S.ofSR Challenger Pkwy 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.65 2 1.30 54,068,942 $3,145,340
Orange 5 Sand Lake Rd President's Or FL Mail 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.00 2 2.00 $6,020,755 $3,010,378
Orange 5 Taft-Vineland Road Extension Central Florida Pkwy John Young Pkwy 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.70 2 1.40 $4,462,535 $3,187,525
Osceola 5 Narcoossee Rd U5192 Orange Co.Line 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 7.40 2 14.80 547,360,000 $3,200,000
Osceola 5 Osceola Pkwy(Ph.l) FLTurnpike Buenaventura Blvd 2009 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.57 2 3.14 $5,966,000 $1,900,000
Osceola 5 Poinciana Blvd(Ph.IQ Crescent Lakes US 17/92 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.50 2 5.00 $16,000,000 $3,200,000
Osceola 5 Old Lake Wilson Rd lPh.l) Livingston Rd Sinclair Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.30 2 4.60 $14,720.000 $3,200,000
Hillsborough 7 Bruce B.Downs Palm Springs Blvd Pebble Beach Blvd 2009 Bid Oto 8 Urban 7.20 4 28.80 $40,575,305 $1,408,865
Hillsborough 7 Race Track Rd(Ph.IV) Douglas Rd Hillsborough Ave 2009 Bid 2to6 Urban 0.56 4 2.24 $4,397,412 $1,963,130
Sarasota 1 Fruitville Rd(Ph.l) Tatum Rd Debrecen Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.72 2 1.44 $4,355,796 $3,024,858
Sarasota 1 Fruitville Rd(Ph.II) Coburn Rd Tatum Rd 2009 Bid 2to 4 Urban 1.26 2 2.52 $8,557,904 $3,395,994
Lee 1 Colonial Blvd(CR 884) 1-75 SR 82 2009 Bid 4 to 6 Urban 2.70 2 5.40 $14,576,393 $2,699,332
Collier 1 Oil Well Rd(Segment 2) Immokalee Rd Everglades Blvd 2009 Bid 2to4/6 Urban 5.05 2/4 10.92 516,759,586 $1,534,761
Collier 1 Oil WeII Rd(Segment 4) Oil Well Grade Rd W.of Camp Keais Rd 2009 Bid 2t 6 Urban 4.72 4 18.88 $17,919,244 $949,113
Orange 5 Alafa aTr Avalon Park Blvd Mark Twain Blvd 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 3.83 2 7.66 516,918,599 52,469,791
Hillsborough 7 Boyette Rd(Ph.III) McMullen Rd Bell Shoals Rd 2010 Bid 2to 4 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 523,184,354 $4,458,530
Broward 4 Bailey Rd NW 64th Ave/SW 81st Ave SR7(US 441) 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.00 2 4.00 $6,330,297 51,582,574
Lee 1 Six Mile Cypress Pkwy Daniels Pkwy S.of Wl nkler Rd Ext. 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 3.09 2 6.18 $6,711,242 51,085,961
Charlotte 1 Pi per Rd Henry St Jones Loop Rd 2010 Bid 2to4 Suburban 2.10 2 4.20 58,627,803 $2,054,239
Sarasota 1 North Cattlemen Rd Richardson Rd Desoto Rd 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.55 2 5.10 $12,153,584 $2,383,056
Lee 1 Daniels Pkwy Chamberlin Pkwy Gateway Blvd 2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 2.05 2 4.10 $2,906,553 $708,915
Orange 5 Rouse Rd SR 50 Corporate Blvd 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 $29,380,249 $5,650,048
Orange 5 CR 535 See.A Magnolia Park Ct SR 429 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.37 2 2.74 $8,390,570 $3,062,252
Osceola 5 Goodman Rd Tri-County Sand Mine Rd 2011 Bid Oto 2 Urban 3.53 2 7.06 $7,060,000 $1,000,000
Pinellas 1 Bryan Dai ry Rd Starkey Rd ICR 1) 72nd St 2011 Bid 4 to 6 Urban 1.47 2 2.94 $10,327,383 53,512,715
Palm Beach 4 SR 806(Atlantic Ave) W.of Lyons Rd Starkey Rd 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.80 2 1.60 $5,307,643 $3,317,277
Palm Beach 4 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd SR 80 N.of Sycamore Dr 2011 Bid 2to 4 Urban 4.30 2 8.60 $9,733,669 $1,131,822
Charlotte 1 Burnt Store Rd(Ph.I) U541 Notre Dame Blvd 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.40 2 4.80 $13,512,394 $2,815,082
Palm Beach 4 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd M Canal S.of Orange Blvd 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.30 2 2.60 $3,646,523 $1,402,509
Polk 1 Kathleen Rd(CR35A)(Ph.II) Galloway Rd Duff Rd 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 3.00 2 6.00 $16,784,760 $2,797,460
Polk 1 Bartow Northern ConneRor(Ph.l) U598 U517/92 2012 Bid Oto4 Urban 2.00 2 4.00 $11,110,205 $2,777,551
Volusia 5 Tymber Creek Rd SR 40 Peruvian Ln 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.75 2 1.50 $5,276,057 $3,517,371
Collier 1 Collier Blvd(CR 951) Golden Gate Blvd Green Blvd 2013 Bid to 6 Urban 2.74 2 5.48 $21,392,039 $3,903,657
242.90 $528,758,921 $2,176,858
Total
Source:Roadway bids from recent impact fee studies throughout Florida as well as recent bids from the TOA Cost Database,with information having been provided by each respective
County
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc.
C-12 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
N
oG
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-15
Construction Cost-State Roads Lan', Lane miles construction cun,tnsrtioncw�
County
Walton District 3 SR 83(US 331) SR 30(US 981 S.end of Choctaw Bridge 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.08 2 4.16 511,649,363 $2,800,326
Hillsborough 7 US 301(SR 431 S.of Balm Rd N.of Gi bsonton Rd 2008 Bid 2to6 Urban 6.03 4 24.72 $55,702,777 $2,309,402
Indian River 4 SR5 U51 S.of Oslo Rd S.of Indian River Bend 2008 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.70 2 3.40 $14,953,562 $4,398,106
Indian River 4 SR 60(Osceola Blvd) W.of 82nd Ave 66th Ave/CR 505 2008 Bid 4to6 Urban 2.15 2 4.30 518,496,793 54,301,5&]
Orange 5 SR 50 Good Homes Rd Pine Hills Rd 2008 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.63 2 7.26 $35,929,914 $4,949,024
Leon 3 SR 10(Mahan Drive) Dempsey Mayo Rd Walden Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 3.10 2 6.20 518,083,530 $2,916,695
Indian River 4 SR W Osceola Blvd W.of 1-95 W.of 82nd Ave/CR 609 2009 Bid Oto 6 Urban 3.07 2 6.14 $7,366,557 $1,799,765
Sarasota 1 US 301 Wood St Myrtle Ave 2009 Bid Oto 6 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 518,372,050 $3,533,087
Sarasota 1 US 301 Myrtle Ave Deso[o Rd 2009 Bid 4to6 Urban L00 2 2.00 $8,293,271 $4,146,636
Pasco 7 U541(SR 45) Tower Rd Ridge no 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.84 2 5.68 $12,685,027 $2,233,279
Lee 1 SR 739 US 41(S.of Ahco) Six MdeC cess Pkw 2009 Bid Oto6 Urban 2.77 6 16.621 520,663,929 51,243,317
Manatee 1 U5301 Erie Rd CR 675 2009 Bid 4to6 Urban 4.10 2 8.20 521,040,000 $2,565,854
Marion 5 SR 35(US 301) Sumter Co.Line 529'5.of CR 42 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.40 2 2.80 $3,596,000 $1,284,286
Miami-Dade 6 Perimeter Rd NW72Avenue NW57Avenue 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.50 2 3.00 $6,363,286 $2,127,762
Polk 1 U527 N.of CR 546 S.of SR 544 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.56 2 3.12 54,100,069 53,314,125
Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) N.of CSX R/R Bride S.of Commerce Rd 2009 Bid 2 t 4 Urban 0.98 2 1.96 $5,621,006 52,867,860
Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) Gulf Rd SR 10(US 901 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.78 2 3.56 $9,150,583 $2,570,388
St.Lucie 4 SR 70 MP 5.860 MP 10.216 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 4.36 2 8.72 $12,426,020 $1,425,002
Sumter 5 SR 35(U53D1) N.of CR 204 Marion County Line 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.51 2 3.02 $3,856,688 $1,277,049
Washington 3 SR 79 N.Environmental Rd Strickland Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.72 2 3.44 58,677,323 $2,580,617
Lake 5 SR 50 E.of Grand Hwy W.of Hancock Rd 2010 Bid Oto 6 Urban 1.30 2 2.60 $4,689,633 $1,803,705
Polk I SR 559 Extension SR 655(Rocker Hw) Derby Ave 2010 Bid Oto2 Urban 0.69 2 1.38 52,751,592 51,993,907
Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) SR 8(1-10) S.of Moor's Lode 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.85 2 1.70 55,378,226 $3,163,662
Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) S.of Moor's Lodge N.o(CS%R/R grid a 2010 Bid 2[04 Urban 1.48 2 2.96 57,145,212 $2,413,923
Lee 1 U541 Corkscrew Rd San Carlos Blvd 2010 Bid 4[06 Urban 4.48 2 8.96 512,622,677 $1,431,102
Polk I 0598 S.of Manor Dr N.of CR 540A 2010 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.32 2 6.64 511,092,909 $1,670,619
St.Lucie 4 SR 70 Okeechobee County Line MP 5.871 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 5.87 2 11.74 $18,782,630 $1,599,683
Polk 1 I— (Bartow Hwy) Brooks St Edgewood Dr2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 0.72 2 1.44 $4,341,977 53,015,220
Hilisborou h 7 CR 39/Alexander 5t N.of 1-4 N.of Knights Griffin 2011 Bid Oto4 Urban 3.19 4 12.76 $14,782,862 $1,158,532
Pinellas 7 SR 688(Ui-----Rd) E.of 119th St W.of Se minole Bypass 2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.50 2 3.00 $16,908,929 55,636,310
Polk 1 SR 60(Van Fleet) W.of US 98/Broadway W.of U517(SR 555) 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.66 2 1.72 $9,540,473 $5,546,787
Lake 5 SR 500(U5441) Martin Luther King Jr.Blvd Lake Ella Rd 2011 Bld 4to6 Urban 3.25 2 6.50 516,278,889 $2,504,444
Hillsborough 7 SR 574(MLK Blvd) W.of Hi hview Rd E.of Parsons Ave 2011 Bid 3to5 Urban 0.91 2 1.82 $7,147,510 53,927,203
Collier 1 SR 14(Davis Blvd) E.of Santa Barbara Blvd W.of Radio Rd 2012 Bid 2to6 Urban 1.77 4 7.08 $10,956,198 $1,547,486
Volusia 5 SR 415 Seminole Co.Line Reed Ellis Rd 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.26 2 4.53 $18,718,637 $4,132,149
Volusia 5 SR415 Reed Ellis Rd 0.3 miles N.of Acorn lake 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 5.07 2 10.13 $16,388,845 $1,815,286
Pinellas 7 U519(SR 55) N.of CR 576/5unset Per S.of Countryside Blvd 2012 Bid6to 10 Urban 1.76 4 7.04 $17,196,050 $2,442,621
Mia-Dad. 6 SR 823/NW 57th Ave W.23rd St W.46th St 2012 Bid
4to6 Urban 1.48 2 2.96 $14,081,161 $4,757,149
Hernando 7 SR 50(Cortet Blvd) U519(SR 55) W.of CR 587/Mariner Blvd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 6.02 2 12.04 539,444,222 53,276,096
Orange 5 SR 50 E.of West Oaks Mall W.of Good Homes Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 0.45 2 0.90 $8,694,472 $9,660,524
Clay 2 SR 23 Oakleaf Plantation Pkwy Old Jennings 2012 Bid 0to2 Urban 3.14 2 6.28 $13,231,111 52,106,865
Hendry 1 SR 80 Birchwood Pkwy Dalton Lane 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 5.00 2 10.00 512,855,092 $1,285,509
Hendry 1 SR 80 CR 833 U527 2012 Bld 2to4 Urban 2.90 2 5.80 $8,117,039 $1,399,489
Lee 1 SR 739 Winkler Ave Hanson St 2012 Bid 0to6 Urban 1.34 6 8.04 $14,025,932 51,744,519
Seminole 5 SR 434 1-4 Rangeline Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.80 2 3.60 510,111,333 52,808,704
Palm Beach 4 SR 710/Beeline Hwy W.of Congress Ave W.of Australian Ave 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban0.84 2 1.68 512,169,533 $7,255,674
Polk 1 US 27 N.of Ritchie Rd S.of Bar Rd 2D32 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.20 2 6.40 514,242,918 $2,225,456
Polk I US 98(SR 35/SR 700) N.of CR 540A SR 540 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.45 2 6.90 $18,004,051 $2,609,283
Brevard 5 SRS(U51) N.of Pine St N.of Cidco Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.64 2 7.66 529,360,536 $3,622,986
Brevard 5 SR 5D7(Babcock St) Mel bou me Ave Fee Ave 2013 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.40 2 0.80 55,167,891 $6,459,664
Hillsborou h 7 SR 41(US 301) S.of Tampa Bypass Canal N.of Fowl el Ave 2013 Bid 2to4 Suburhan 1.81 2 3.61 515,758,965 $4,365,364
,498,393 $ 450,566
Lee 1 US 41 Business Littleton Rd SR 739 2013 Bld 2to4 Urban 1.23 2 29405 $72.46 17,943,565 52,441,570
Total 63% $2,000,000
Total(Adjusted Indian River County Cost per lane Mile
Source:FDOT recently-bid projects by transportation district,available at www dot.state.fl.Us/
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc.
C-13 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
N
r
,a
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-16
Construction Engineering/Inspection Factor—County&State Roads
CountyCounty Roadways State Roadways
Year
200 Collier $294,054 $2,558,5461 11% $354,442 $3,385,978 10%
2006 Citrus $180,887 $2,584,099 7% $474,464 $2,860,227 17%
2007 Pasco $215,534 $3,079,051 7% $442,849 $3,050,799 15%
2007 Lake $116,441 $2,911,021 4% $318,412 $3,184,125 10%
2007 Flagler $174,000 $1,740,000 10% - - n/a
2007 Volusia $238,660 $2,651,778 9% $309,526 $3,095,258 10%
2008 Leon $372,400 $2,660,000 14% $270,640 $3,383,000 8%
2008 Sumter $223,700 $2,237,000 10% $238,000 $2,380,000 10%
2009 Collier $186,000 $3,100,000 6% $320,000 $3,200,000 10%
2009 Polk $111,300 $1,590,000 7% $217,000 $2,170,000 10%
2009 Hillsborough/Tampa $308,000 $2,800,000 11% $315,000 $3,500,000 9%
2010Collier $119,560 $1,708,000 7% $241,800 $2,418,000 10%
2011 Sarasota/North Port $216,000 $2,400,000 9% $180,000 $2,000,000 9%
2012 Osceola $265,140 $2,651,400 10% $313,258 $2,847,800 11%
2012 City of Orlando - $2,400,000 n/a - $2,900,000 n/a
Average $215,8341 $2,466,931 $307,338 $2,882,707 11%
(a) (b)
Source:Recent impact fee studies constructed throughout Florida
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
N June 2014 C-14 Impact Fee Update Study
W
d
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Roadway Capacity
As shown in Table C-17, the average capacity per lane mile was based on the projects in the
2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. This listing of projects reflects the mix of
improvements that will yield the vehicle miles of capacity (VMC) that will be built in Indian
River County.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-15 Impact Fee Update Study
i3
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-17
Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan
DescriptionJurisdiction Lanes Lane Initial Future Added Vehicle Miles
Added Added
Cost Feasible Plan
State US 1 Highland Dr St.Lucie Co.Line 4 to 6 0.62 2 1.20 39,800 59,900 20,100 12,462
State US 1 53rd St CR 510 4to 6 4.30 2 8.60 39,800 59,900 20,100 86,430
County CR 510 CR 512 66th Ave 2 to 4 4.20 2 8.40 14,580 31,950 17,370 72,954
County CR 510 66th Ave US 1 2 to 4 1.60 2 3.20 14,580 31,950 17,370 27,792
County CR 510 US 1 Intercoastal Waterway 2to 4 0.50 2 1.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 8,685
County CR512 11-95 Willow St 2to4 3.10 2 6.20 12,780 27,360 14,580 45,198
County Oslo Rd 1-95 58th Ave 2to4 3.60 2 7.201 14,580 31,9501 17,370 62,532
County 43rd Ave St.Lucie Co.Line Oslo Rd 2 to 4 2.00 2 4.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 39,780
County 43rd Ave Oslo Rd 16th St 2 to 4 3.00 2 6.00 20,149 35,820 15,671 47,013
County 66th Ave 41st St 69th St 2to 4 3.50 2 7.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 60,795
County 66th Ave 69th St CR 510 2 t 4 2.00 2 4.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 34,740
County 66th Ave CR 510 Barber St 2to4 0.85 2 1.70 14,580 31,950 17,370 14,765
County 82nd Ave 26th St 69th St 0 to 2 5.00 2 10.00 0 14,580 14,580 72,900
County 82nd Ave 69th St CR 510 0 to 2 2.00 2 4.001 0 15,9301 15,930 31,860
County 82nd Ave CR 510 Laconia St 0 to 2 0.60 2 1.20 0 15,930 15,930 9,558
County Roseland Rd CR 512 us 1 2 to 4 4.70 2 9.40 15,930 35,820 19,890 93,483
County Indian River Blvd 20th St Merril Barber Bridge 4to 6 1.00 2 2.00 35,820 53,910 18,090 18,090
County Indian River Blvd Merril Barber Bridge 45th St 4to6 2.00 2 4.00 35,820 53,910 18,090 36,180
County 25th St SW 27th Ave 58th Ave 2 t 4 1.80 2 3.60 15,930 35,820 19,890 35,802
County 26th St 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2 to 4 1.00 2 2.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 19,890
County 27th Ave Oslo Rd St.Lucie Co.Line 2to4 2.00 2 4.001 15,930 35,8201 19,890 39,780
County 4th St 66th Ave 98th Ave Oto 2 4.10 2 8.20 0 14,5801 14,580 59,778
County 12th St 58th Ave 66th Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930
County 53rd St 58th Ave 66th Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930
County IS3rd St 66th Ave 82nd Ave Oto 2 2.00 2 4.D0 0 15,930 15,9301 31,860
County 69th St 66th Ave Fellsmere N-S Rd 1 Oto 2 7.00 2 14.00 0 14,580 14,580 102,060
County 58th Ave Oslo Rd St.Lucie Co.Line Oto 4 2.10 4 8.40 0 35,820 35,820 75,222
County 74th Ave 8th St Oslo Rd 0 to 2 2.00 2 4.00 0 15,930 15,930 31,860
County 98th Ave 8th St 4th St 0 to 2 0.50 2 1.00 01 15,930 15,930 7,965
County 5th St SW Old Dixie Hwy 20th Ave Oto 2 1.40 2 2.801 01 15,930 15,930 22,302
Unfunded Needs
State US 1 CR 510 Shuman Dr 4to 6 3.00 2 6.00 39,800 59,900 20,100 60,300
State US 1 Shuman Dr CR 512 4to 6 1.60 2 3.20 39,800 59,900 20,100 32,160
County CR 510 SRA1A Intercoastal Waterway 2to4 0.80 2 1.60 14,580 31,950 17,370 13,896
County CR 512 1-95 CR 510 4to 6 2.60 2 5.20 31,950 48,150 16,200 42,120
County 26th St 58th Ave 66th Ave 2 t 4 1.DO 2 2.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 19,890
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-16 Impact Fee Update Study
N
w
N
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table C-17(continued)
Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan
DescriptionLane Vehicle Mil
Jurisdiction Lanes Initial Future Added
(County/State) Added Added Capacity Capacity Capacity Added
Unfunded Needs
County Fellsmere N-S Rd 1 CR 512 69th St 0 to 2 3.50 2 7.00 0 12,780 12,780 44,730
County Fellsmere N-S Rd 2 CR 512 69th St 0 to 2 3.50 2 7.00 0 12,780 12,780 44,730
County Fleming St Airport Perimeter Rd CR 512 Oto2 1.30 2 2.60 0 14,580 14,580 18,954
County Airport Perimeter Rd US 1 Roseland Rd Oto 2 2.40 2 4.80 0 14,580 14,580 34,992
County Fellsmere E-W Rd CR 512 Fellsmere N-S Rd 2 Oto 2 3.70 2 7.40 0 12,780 12,780 47,286
County 33rd St 66th Ave 74th Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930
County 133rd St 74th Ave 82nd Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930
County 174th Ave 26th St 33rd St Oto 2 0.50 2 1.00 0 15,930 15,930 7,965
County 12th St 66th Ave 74th Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930
County 1st St SW 58th Ave 82nd Ave Oto 2 3.00 2 6.00 0 15,930 15,930 47,790
County 5th St SW 58th Ave 82nd Ave Oto 2 3.00 2 6.00 0 15,930 15,930 47,790
County 13th St SW 20th Ave 158th Ave Oto 2 2.50 2 5.00 0 15,930 15,930 39,825
County 17th St SW 20th Ave 158th Ave Oto 2 2.50 1 2 5.001 0 15,9301 15,930 39,825
Total(All Roads): 220.90 1,823,639
County Roads: 201.90 91%(a) 1,632,287
State Roads: 19.00 9%(b) 191,352
Urban Section Design: 74.20 34%(c)
Rural Section Design: 146.70 66%(d)
Source:Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan
Note:Letter references(i.e.,"a")are used to assist with footnotes and sourcing
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 C-17 Impact Fee Update Study
N
W
W
Appendix D
Transportation Impact Fee
Credit Component Calculations
2 3�1
Indian River County i Impact Fee Update Study
Credit Component
This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the credit component. Currently, in
addition to the capital support that ultimately results from State fuel tax revenues, Indian
River County also receives financial benefit from several other funding sources. Of these,
County fuel taxes that are collected in Indian River County are listed below, along with a few
pertinent characteristics of each.
1. Constitutional Fuel Tax(2C/gallon)
• Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county.
Collected in accordance with Article XII, Section 9 (c) of the Florida Constitution.
• The State allocated 80 percent of this tax to Counties after first withholding amounts
pledged for debt service on bonds issued pursuant to provisions of the State
Constitution for road and bridge purposes.
• The 20 percent surplus can be used to support the road construction program within
the county.
• Counties are not required to share the proceeds of this tax with their municipalities.
2. County Fuel Tax(1C/gallon)
• Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county.
• Primary purpose of these funds is to help reduce a County's reliance on ad valorem
taxes.
• Proceeds are to be used for transportation-related expenses, including the reduction
of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Authorized uses include
acquisition of rights-of-way; the construction, reconstruction, operation,
maintenance, and repair of transportation facilities, roads, bridges, bicycle paths,
and pedestrian pathways; or the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for
transportation purposes.
• Counties are not required to share the proceeds of this tax with their municipalities.
3. 1St Local option Tax(up to 6C/gallon)
• Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county.
• Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures.
• To accommodate statewide equalization, all six cents are automatically levied on
diesel fuel in every county, regardless of whether a County is levying the tax on
motor fuel at all or at the maximum rate.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 D-1 Impact Fee Update Study
23S
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
• Proceeds are distributed to a county and its municipalities according to a mutually
agreed upon distribution ratio, or by using a formula contained in the Florida
Statutes.
Each year, the Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR)
produces the Local Government Financial Information Handbook, which details the
estimated local government revenues for the upcoming fiscal year. Included in this
document are the estimated distributions of the various fuel tax revenues for each county
in the state. The 2013-14 data represent projected fuel tax distributions to Indian River
County for the upcoming fiscal year. In the table, the fuel tax revenue data are used to
calculate the value per penny (per gallon of fuel) that should be used to estimate the
"equivalent pennies" of other revenue sources. Table D-1 shows the distribution per penny
for each of the fuel levies, and then the calculation of the weighted average for the value of
a penny of fuel tax. The weighting procedure takes into account the differing amount of
revenues generated for the various types of gas tax revenues. The weighted average figure
of approximately $0.74 million estimates the annual revenue that one penny of gas tax
generates in Indian County.
Table D-1
Estimated Fuel Tax Distribution Allocated to Capital Programs for
Indian River County& Municipalities, FY 2013-1411
Tax Amount of Levy Total • •
perGallon Distribution
Constitutional Fuel Tax $0.02 $1,592,578 $796,289
County Fuel Tax $0.01 $701,978 $701,978
1st Local Option (1-6 cents) $Q.06 14164.,623 $727,437
Total $0.091 $6,659,1791 1
Weighted Average(2) $739,909
(1) Source: Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research,
http://edr.state.fl.us/content/`local-government/reports/
(2) The weighted average distribution per penny is calculated by taking the sum of the total
distribution and dividing that value by the sum of the total levies per gallon (multiplied
by 100).
Gas Tax Credit
A revenue credit for the annual gas tax equivalent expenditures on roadway capacity
expansion projects in Indian River County is presented below. The two components of the
credit are as follows:
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 D-2 Impact Fee Update Study
23 �
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
• County gas tax equivalent pennies
• State gas tax expenditures
County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies
A review of the County's historical roadway financing program (FY 2008-2013) and the
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY 2014-2017 indicates that a combination of sales tax
revenues, fuel tax revenues, impact fees, developer contributions, and grants are used to
fund roadway capacity expansion projects. With the County's local option sales tax set to
expire in 2019 and the re-adoption and dedication to transportation unknown, a sales tax
credit was given only for programmed expenditures in the CIP. If the sales tax is re-adopted
in 2019 or a different revenue source is allocated to transportation capacity to replace the
sales tax revenues,these credit figures may need to be revised.
As shown in Table D-2, Indian River County receives a credit of 5.6 pennies for the portion
of non-impact fee revenues (excluding sales tax) dedicated to capacity expansion projects
such as new road construction, lane additions, and intersection improvements.
Table D-2
County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies(Excluding Sales Tax)
Cost of Number of Revenue Equivalent
Source Projects Years from I Pennies(4)
Penny(3)
Projected CIP Expenditures(FY 2014-2017)(1) $18,612,373 4 $739,9091 $0.063
Historical County Expenditures(FY 2008-2013)(Z) $22,996,4161 6 $739,9091 $0.052
Total $41,608,789 10 $739,909 $0.056
(1) Source:Table D-5
(2) Source:Table D-5
(3) Source:Table D-1
(4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny(Item 3)divided by 100
As shown in Table D-3, Indian River County receives a credit of 11.1 pennies for the portion
of non-impact fee revenues (sales tax ONLY) dedicated to capacity expansion projects such
as new road construction, lane additions, and intersection improvements. In the impact fee
calculation, this credit will only be applied for five years, as the sales tax will not be
considered a recurring revenue source for transportation capacity improvements.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 D-3 Impact Fee Update Study
237
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table D-3
County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies(Sales Tax ONLY)
Cost of Numberof
Source from 1 (4)
Projects Years Penny(3) Pennies
Projected CIP Expenditures(FY 2014-2017)"' $59,458,414 4 $739,909 1 0.201
Historical County Expenditures(FY 2008-2013)(Z) $22,319,296 6 $739,9091 $0.050
Total $81,777,710 10 $739,909 $0.111
(1) Source:Table D-6
(2) Source:Table D-6
(3) Source:Table D-1
(4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny(Item 3)divided by 100
State Gas Tax Expenditures
In the calculation of the equivalent pennies of gas tax from the State, expenditures on
roadway capacity expansion spanning a 10-year period (from FY 2009 to FY 2018) were
reviewed. For calculation purposes, the 10-year period was broken into two increments;
historical (FY 2009-2013) and future (FY 2014-2018). Information on historical projects'
funding and the future year estimates was obtained from the MOT Work Programs and the
County's FY 2014-2018 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The use of a 10-year
period, for purposes of developing a State credit for roadway capacity expansion projects,
results in a stable credit, as it accounts for the volatility in MOT spending in the county over
short periods of time.
The total cost of the capacity-adding projects for the five-year "historical" period and
projected in the five-year Transportation Improvement Program are as follows:
• FY 2009-2013 work plan equates to 20.5 pennies
• FY 2014-2018 work plan equates to 10.5 pennies
The combined weighted average over the 10-year period of state expenditure for capacity-
adding roadway projects results in a total of 15.5 equivalent pennies, which is a slightly
higher state credit than what is observed in most other counties. Table D-4 documents this
calculation. The specific projects that were used in the equivalent penny calculations are
summarized in Table D-7.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 D-4 Impact Fee Update Study
Z38
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table D-4
Equivalent Penny Calculation for State Portion Revenue
Costof Numberof
Source Projects Years Penny(3) Pennies�4)
Projected TIP(FY 2014-2018)1) $38,959,997 5 $739,909 $0.105
Historical Work Program(FY 2009-2013)(" 75 954 895 5 $739,909 $0.205
Total $114,914,892 10 $739,909 $0.155
(1) Source:Table D-7,total cost of expansion projects
(2) Source:Table D-7,total cost of expansion projects
(3) Source:Table D-1
(4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny(Item 4)divided by 100
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 D-5 impact Fee Update Study
z34
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table D-5
Historical and Future Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures for Indian River County,FY 2007/08 to 2016/17(excluding sales tax expenditures)
D- 200 7/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10FTr r r r r r .r
/17 Total
Lane Addition(0 to 2) Powerli ne Rd from Barber St to CR 510 $134,482 $478,904 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $613,386
Lane Addition(0 to 2) 37th St from 58th Ave to 66th Ave $558,218 -$4,341 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $553,877
Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th Ave to Timber Ridge $1,202,748 $35,586 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,238,334
Lane Addition(Oto 2) College Lane Extension-IRSC $0 $400,D00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Widen to 5 Lanes CR 512 from Sebastian River Middle to 1-95 $2,745,686 $107,391 $20,067 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $2,873,144
Lane Addition(0 to 2) 16th St from 66th Ave to 82nd Ave $512,500 $266,380 $878,005 $110,351 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,767,236
Lane Addition(11J to 2D) 20th Ave SW from 17th St to 25th St $19,662 $135 $837 $542,713 $153,032 $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $716,379
Lane Addition(Oto 2) 66th Ave from 12th St to SR 60 $845,251 $927,608 $45,119 $0 $8,289 $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $1,826,267
Widen to 5 Lanes 53rd St from Kings Hwy to US 1 $0 $0 $0 $270,231 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $270,231
Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th St to 43rd Ave $0 $0 $25,748 $3,400 $2,731 $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $31,879
Widen to 3 Lanes 66th Ave from 4th Ave to 12th St $100,000 $0 $0 $2,052 $0 $500,000 $0 $D $0 $0 $602,052
Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 12th St to 18th St $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $D $0 $319,745 $SDO,ODO $3,500,000 $4,319,745
Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 18th St to 26th 5t $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,805,330 $3,102,938 $653,580 $0 $6,561,848
Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from SR 60 to 49th St $0 $0 $1,810,361 $0 $0 $6,270,379 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,080,740
Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 61st Drto Indian River $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,780 $D $0 $0 $130,780
Widen to 4 Lanes CR 51D from 70th Ave to 61st or $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $403,691 $700,DOO $600,000 $0 $500,000 $2,203,691
Widen to4Lanes CR 510from CR 512 to 70th Ave $0 $0 $0 $0
$D $D $400,000 $500,000 $1,900,000 $0 $2,800,000
Right-of-Way Acquisition Miscellaneous $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
$500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000
Widen to 4 Lanes Oslo Rd from 43rd Ave to 58th Ave $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,869,200 $0 $0 $D
$0 $2,869,200
Traffic Controllers Countywide $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000
Traffic Fiber Optic Countywide 0 0 0 0 0 150000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150 000 750 000
Total $6,118,547 $2,211,663 $2,780,137 $928,747 $164,052 $10,793,270 $4,786,110 $5,272,683 $3,803,580 $4,750,000 $41,608,789
Historical and Future Time Period Totals - - - 2008-2013: $22,996,416 $18,612,373
Source:Indian River County Planning Department
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 D-6 Impact Fee Update Study
L
d
Indian River County(Impact Fee Update Study
Table D-6
Historical and Future Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures for Indian River County,FY 2007/08 to 2016/17(sales tax expenditures ONLY)
Description On/From/To FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FT 2010111r r .
/17 Total
Lane Addition(0 to 2) Atlantic Blvd,W of 58th Ave $0 $140,889 $0 $0 $0 $D $D $O $0 $0 $140,889
Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th Ave to Tmber Ridge $21,303 $630 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,933
Lane Addition(Oto 2) 16th St from 66th Ave to 82nd Ave $145,447 $77,209 $327,197 $309,944 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $859,797
Widen to 3 Lanes 17th Ln from SW 20th Ave to 27th Ave $2,295 $49,462 $1,986 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,743
Widen to 5 Lanes 53rd St from Kings Hwy to US 1 $0 $36,387 $0 $1,523,628 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,560,015
Add Left Turn Lane/Traffic Signal 1st St SW @ 27th Ave $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,325,000 $D $0 $0 $0 $1,325,000
Add Left Turn Lane/Traffic Signal 1st St SW @ 43rd Ave $0 TO $0 $0 $0 $1,325,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $1,325,000
Add Left Turn Lane 20th Ave @ 16th St $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $75,0001 $1,DOO,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,075,000
Add Right Turn Lane 37th St @ Indian River Blvd $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000
Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 18th St to 26th St $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,179,834 $4,453,580 $0 $6,633,414
Add Left Turn Lane 45 St/58th Ave $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Add Left Turn Lane 45 St @ US 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $675,000
Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 33rd St $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $D $800,000 $825,000
Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 37th St $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $600,000 $625,000
Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 69th St $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $800,000 $825,000
Widen to 3 Lanes 66th Ave from 4th Ave to 12th St $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,781,381 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,781,381
Lane Addition(0 to 2) 66th Ave from 12th St to SR 60 $0 $0 $53,079 $0 $810,238 $2,027,084 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,890,401
Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from 77th St to Sebastian City Limits $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,550,000 $500,000 $0 $8,050,000
Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from SR 60 to 49th St $1,517,365 $1,479,765 $8,435 $1,073,395 $372,177 $4,600,000 $9,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $18,151,137
Add Left Turn Lanes 69th St @ US 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $600,000 $625,000
Intersection Improvements 4th St @ 82nd Ave $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $755,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $755,000
Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 61st Drto Indian River $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $7,300,0001 $10,500,000 $18,200,000
Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 70th Ave to 61st Dr $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $4,700,000 $3,000,000 $7,700,000
Intersection Improvements Miscellaneous $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $3,000,000
Right-of-Way Acq u i s ti on Miscellaneous $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,DOO
Intersection Improvements Oslo Rd @ SR 60 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Traffic Fiber Optic Countywide0 0 0 0 0 150 000 150 000 150 000 150 000 150 000 750 000
Total $1,686,410 $1,784,342 $390,6971 $2,906,967 $1,182,415 $14,368,465 $11,525,000 $11,579,834 $18,803,580 $17,550,000 $81,777,710
Historical and Future Time Period Totals - - 2008-2013: $22,319,296 $59,458,414
Source:Indian River County Planning Department
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 D-7 Impact Fee Update Study
N
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table D-7
FY 2009-FY 2018 Indian River County MOT Work Program&Transportation Improvement Program-Capacity-Expansion Projects
Proj# Description On/From/To FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012r r15 FY 2016 FY 2017r
203879-1 New Road Construction 82nd Ave from 26th St to CR 510 $142 341 $132 786 $31 548 $45,415 $47,443 $3 650,022 $8,045,507 $0 $0 $0 $12,095 062
228583-2 Add lanes&Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from St.Lucie Co.Line to S of Highland Dr 534,962 $1,166 $164,904$14,451 369 $375,523 $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $15,027,924
228583-4 Add Lanes&Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from 5 of Highland Dr to 5 of Oslo Rd $1,986 $32,957 $247,278 $12,419,012 $285,655 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $12,986,888
228583-5 Add Lanes&Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from 5 of Oslo Rd to S of Indian River Blvd $75,921 $391,440 $165,180 $72 $3,322 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $635,935
228613-2 Traffic Signals Indian River CountyEnhance Traffic Signal Sstem $200,000 $35,750 $111,181 $0 $0 $0 $0 So SO $0 $346,931
228613-3 Traffic Signals Indian River CountyCountywide Traffic Signal Eui mentUpgrades $0 $D $0 $656,578 SO So $0 $0 SO $0 $656,578
228613-4 Traffic Signals Indian River CountyCountywide Traffic Signal Equipment U rades $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $706 543 $0 $0 $0 $706,543
228627-1 Add Lanes&Reconstruct SR 60/Osceola Blvd from W of 82nd Ave/CR 609 to 66th Ave/CR 615 $1,143,945 $15,786,537 $1,635,891 $174,490 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,740,863
228628-1 Add Lanes&Reconstruct SR 60/Osceola Blvd from W of 1-95 to W of 82nd Ave/CR 609 $791,639 $4,050 $385,420 $5,012,856 $S,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $11,193,965
230872-1 Add lanes&Reconstruct 16/17th St from 500'W of 14th Ave to W of SR 5/US 1 $4,056,733 $168,834 $93,759 $249 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,319,575
404740-1 Traffic Signals Indian River CountyJPA Signal Maintenance&Ops on SHS $103,457 $102,679 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,136
410348-2 Interchange New 1-95/SR9 @ Oslo Rd Interchange $369 $0 $59,529 $1,154,840 $7,350 $0 $3 400,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,622,088
416418-1 Traffic Control Devices/System Indian River CountySignal System Group3 $3,068,999 $79,254M$1014,802
$0 $0 $0 $0 SD SD $0 $3,148,995
422914-1 Add Turn Lanes 17th St S.of Indian River Blvd in Vero Beach $0 $0 $1,150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $100,983
425864-1 Add Turn Lanes Schumann Dr @ Barber St SO $0 $0 $0 So $0 $1,69D,00 $0 $0 $1,690,0
425883-1 Add Lanes&Reconstruct 66th Ave from SR 60 to 41st St $0 $0 $5,709,602 $560,777 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,270,379.
427804-1 Traffic Signals Indian River Ci 1PASi nal Maintenance&Ops on SHS $0 $0 $107,576 $110,744 $114,600 $118,000 $0 $D So $555,722
427804-2 Traffic Si nals Indian River Ci 1PASi nal Maintenance&O son SHS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $121,600 $125,000 $129,000 $375,600
430214-1 Fundin Action 82nd Avefrom 26th Stto CR 510 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,835,946 $1801947 $2,749,141 $7,387,034
431521-1 Add Lanes&Reconstruct Oslo Rd from SR 9/1-95 to 58th Ave $0 $0 SO $0 $1,610,000 $0 $2,210,000 $D $0 $3,820,000
431724-1 Add Lanes&Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from 53rd St to CR 510 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 $3,005 000 $5 000 $D $1,910,00c) $0 $4,931,000
431759-1 Intersection Improvement SR 60 @ 43rd Ave $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,708,759 $1,120,000 $1,169,000 $734,932 $4,732,691
433239-1 New Road Construction CR 512 12 $Q $,Q i 5364.000 S2 $Q $Q >iL1 5364.000
Total $9 620 352$16 735,453 $3 100,067$39,733,209 $6,765,814 $8,379,622$13,983,809 $7,977,546 $5,005,9471 $3,613,073$114 914 892
Historical and Future Time Period Totals - - 2009-2013:$75,954 95 - 2014-2018:1$38,9S9,9971
Source: FOOT Gaming Reports for Indian River County and the FY 2014-2018 Transportation Improvement Program
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 D-8 Impact Fee Update Study
L
N
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table D-8
Average Motor Vehicle Fuel Efficiency—Excluding Interstate Travel
Travel
Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) @ Percent VMT
21.4 6.3 •.
OtherArterial Rural 322,037,000,000 46,267,000,000 368,304,000,000 87% 13%
Other Rural 319,465,000,000 32,818,000,000 352,283,000,000 91% 9%
Other Urban 1,397,059,000,000 83,069,000,000 1,480,128,000,000 94% 6%
Total 2,038,561,000,000 162,154,000,000 2,200,715,000,000 93% 7%
ConsumedFuel
Gallons @ 21.4 •' •' 2,200,715 miles(millions)
Other Arterial Rural 15,048,457,944 7,343,968,254 22,392,426,198 120,999 gallons(millions)
Other Rural 14,928,271,028 5,209,206,349 20,137,477,377 18.19 mpg
Other Urban 65,283,130,841 13,185,555,556 78,468,686,397
Total 95,259,859,813 25,738,730,159 120,998,589,972
Source: U.S.Department of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration,Highway Statistics 2011,Section V,Table VM-1
Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data -2011 by Highway Category and Vehicle Type
htti)://www.fhwa.dot.gov/i)olicyinformation/statistics.cfm
Source:See Table D-9
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
N June 2014 D-9 Impact Fee Update Study
s
W
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table D-9
Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data (2011) - By Highway Category and Vehicle Type'/
Published March 2013 TABLE VM-1
SUBTOTALS
LIGHT DUTY LIGHT DUTY SINGLE-UN IT 2-AXLE
YEAR ITEM VEHICLES • ••- BUSES16) VEHICLES SINGLE-UNIT COMBINATION • ••
ALL LIGHT 6-TIRE OR MORE
CYCLES
•• • TRUCKS(3) TRUCKS AND COMBINATION
TRUCKS
Motor-Vehicle Travel:
(millions of vehicle-miles)
2011 Interstate Rural 140,603 1,243 1,670 42,961 9,495 47,616 183,564 57,111 243,587
2011 Other Arterial Rural 232,385 2,814 1,981 89,651 16,945 29,321 322,037 46,267 373,099
2011 Other Rural 226,037 3,016 2,052 93,427 18,090 14,729 319,465 32,818 357,351
2011 All Rural 599,026 7,073 5,703 226,040 44,530 91,666 825,065 136,196 974,038
2011 Interstate Urban 341,865 2,134 2,112 82,652 14,126 33,815 424,517 47,942 476,704
2011 Other Urban 1,102,519 9,293 5,967 294,541 44,859 38,210 1,397,059 83,069 1,495,389
2011 All Urban 1,444,384 11,427 8,079 377,193 58,985 72,026 1,821,576 131,011 1,972,094
2011 Total Rural and Urban(5) 2,043,409 18,500 13,783 603,232 103,515 163,692 2,646,641 267,207 2,946,131
2011 Number of motor vehicles 192,513,278 8,330,210 666,064 41,328,144 7,819,055 2,451,638 233,841,422 10,270,693 253,108,389
registered(2)
2011 Averagemiles traveled 10,614 2,221 20,693 14,596 13,239 66,768 11,318 26,016 11,640
per vehicle
2011 Person-miles oftravell°I 2,839,083 19,927 292,192 805,888 103,515 163,692 1 3,644,971 267,207 4,224,297
(millions)
2011 Fuel consumed 88,536,602 425,410 1,932,823 35,325,791 14,183,270 28,193,355 123,862,392 42,376,625 168,597,250
(thousand gallons)
2011 Average fuel consumption per 460 51 2,902 855 1,814 11,500 530 4,126 666
vehicle(gallons)
2011 Average miles traveled per 23.1 43.5 7.1 17.1 7.3 5.9 21.4 6.3 17.5
gallon offuel consumed
MV-9,and MV-10),otherdata such as the R.L.Polk vehicle data,and a host of modeling techniques. FOr2011,changes in a couple of States'truck VMT substantiallyimpacted national
truck VMT
trends. Upon further review with the States involved,FHWA still considers these changes as material fact. However,FHWA will conduct further analysis when the 2012 data are
reported bythe
States in 2013.
(2)Light Duty Vehicles Short WB-passenger cars,light trucks,vans and sport utility vehicles with a wheelbase(WM)equal to or less than 121 inches. Light Duty Vehicles Long WB-large
passenger
cars,vans,pickup trucks,and sport/utility vehicles with wheelbases(WB)largerthan 121 inches. All Light Duty Vehicles-passenger cars,light trucks,vans and sport utilityvehicles
regardless of
(3)Single-Unit-single frame trucks that have 2-Axles and at least 6tires ora gross vehicle weight rating exceeding 10,000 lbs.
(4)Vehicle occupancy is estimated bythe FHWA from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey(NHTS);For single unit truck and heavy trucks,1 motorvehicle mile travelled=1 person-mile
traveled.
(5)VMT data are based on the latest HPMS data available;it may not match previous published results.
(6)The change in the number of buses is primarily due to the decline of reported public operated school buses.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
N June 2014 D-10 Impact Fee Update Study
Appendix E
Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
2.L15'
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table E-1
Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
Gasoline Tax Unit Construction Cost: $2,591,000 Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor: 17.3%
$$per gallon to capital: $0.211 $0.111 County Rev(No STI: $0.056 Capacity per lane mile: 8,255 Cost per VMC: $313.87
Facility life(years): 25 5 County Rev(ST): $0.111 Fuel Efficiency: 18.19 mpg Administrative Fee: 2.5%
Interest ate: 2.5% 2.5% State Revenues: $0.155 Effectiveda s 365
ITE A-...ble Total Trip 2009
LUC Land Us, Unit Trip Rate Trip Rate S...ce Total Imp- Aroulal Gas Gas Ta� Annual Sal,,T, Total Credit Net
Trip Length lorgil, Trip Length Stu- %New Trip, %Ne,T,ips Slure, Net VMT C." Ta. Credit Sales Ta, Fimp"c' Adopted
Credit Chano,
RESR)ENTUIL:
Single Family(Detached) du
FL Studies(NHTS,
Less than 1,000 IT du 5.78 AHS,Census) 6.62 7.12 FL Studies 100% N/A 15.82 $4,966 $87 $1,603 $46 $214 $1,817 $3,149
$2,974 6%
21D FL Studies(NETS,
1,000 to 1,499 If du 6.52 AHS,Census) 6.62 7.12 FL Studies 1D09. N/A 17.85 $5,602 $98 $1,806 $52 $242 $2,048 $3,554
$2,974 20%
FL Studies(NHTS,
S,SOO to 2,499 sf du 7.81 AHS,Census) 6.62 7.12 FL Studies 100% N/A 21.38 $6,710 $118 $2,174 $62 $288 $2,462 $4,248
$4,483 S.
FL Studies INHTS,
2,500sforlarer tlu 9.20 AHS,Census) 6.62 7.12 FL Studies 100% N/A 25.18 $7,904 $139 $2,561 $73 $339 $2,900 $S,OD4
$5,031 -1%
Blend ITE 9th&FL FL Studies
220 Multi-Family/Accesso Unit du 6.60 Studies 5.10 5.60 (LUC 220/230) 1D09'. N/A 13.92 $4,369 $78 $1,437 $41 $190 $1,627
$2,742H$2,.413%
240 Mobile Home/RV(tied doom) tlu 4.17 FL Studies 4.60 5.10 FL Studie100% N/A 7.93 $2,490 $45 $829 $24 $111 $940
$1,550 -11%
TRANSIENT ASUSTED GROUP:
Blend ITE 9th&FL
310 Hotel mom 6.36 Studies 6.26 6.76 FL Studies 66% FL Studies 10.87 $3,410 $60 $1,105 $32 $149 $1,254 $2,156
$2,804 -23%
320 Motel room 5.63 ITE 9th Edition 4.34 4.84 FL Studies 77% FL Studies 7.78 $2,442 $44 $811 $23 $107 $918
$1,524 $1,516 1%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
620 Nursing Home bed 2076 Studies 2.59 3.09 FL Studies 899S FL Studies 2.63 $826 $16 $295 $8 $37 $332
$494 $432 14%
Blend ITE 9th&FL Same as LUC 253
252 Assisted Care Llvin Facili (ACT) bed 2.97 Studies 3.28 3.78 FL Studies 72% Ise.Ap endix B) 2.90 $910 $17 $313 $9
$42 $355 $555 $620 -11%
OFFICE&FINAWNL:
FL Studies
720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 s f or less 1,000 If 23.83 Collier County) 5.55 6.05 FL Studies 899S FL Studies 48.67 $15,277 $272
$5,011 $143 $664 $51675 $9,602 $13,411 -28%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 If 1,DDD If 34.72 Studies 5.55 6.05 FL Studies 89% FL Studies 70.92 $22,258 $396
$7,296 $208 $966 $6,262 $13,996 $13,411 4%
911 Bank/Savings Walkle1,000 If 121.30 ITE 91h Edition 2.46 2.96 Same as LUC 912 46% Same as LUC 912 56.76 $17,815 $350 $6,449 $184
$855 $7,304 $10,511 $10,634 -1%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
912 Bank/Savings Drive1, 1,000 If 159.34 Studies 2.46 2.96 FL Studies 46% FL Studies 74.56 $23,401 $459 $8,4S7 $242
$1,124 $9,581 $13,820 $13,020 6%--
710 General Office 1,000 sf 11.03 ITE 9th Edition S,11 5.65 FL Studies 92% FL Studies 21.61 $6,783 $121 $2,229 $64
$29] $2,526 $4,257 $3,798 12%
Same as LUC]70 Same as LUC 770
760 Research&Development Center 1,000 s1 B.11 ITE 9th Edition 5.36 5.66 (see Appendix B) 69% see Appendix B) 16.06 $5,040 $90 $1,658
$4] $218 $1,876 $3,164 52,798 13%
INDUSTRIAL:
140 Manufacturing 1,000 IF 3.82 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 730 7.48 $2,349 $42 $774 $22
$102 $876 $1,473 $1,318 12%
150 Warehousing 1,000 If 3.56 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 730 92% Same as LUC 730 6.97 $2,189 $39 $719 $21 $98
$617 $1,372 $1,228 12%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000 If 2.15 Studies 3.10 3.60 FL Schedules 92% Same as LUC 710 2.54 $796 $15 $276 $8 $37 $313
$483 $862 -44%
152 High-Cube(Automated)Warehouse 1,000 IF 1.68 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 730 92% Same as LUC 710 3.29 $1,033 $18 $332
$10 $46 $378 $655 $1,228 -07%
110 General Light Industrial 1,000 IF 6.97 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 13.66 $4,286 $77 $1,419 $40
$186 $1,605 $2,681 $2,404 12%
2005 IRC Impact
n/a Concrete Plant arn, 15.60 Fee Study 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% 1 Same as LUC 710 30.56 $9,593 $172 $3,169 $90 $418
$3,587 $6,006 $5,382 1 12%
2005 IRC Impact
n/a Sand Mining 2.00 Fee Stud 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% 1 Same as LUC 710 3.92 $1,230 $22 $405 $12 $56 $461 $769
$G90 11%
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 E-1 Impact Fee Update Study
N
L
r
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table E-1(continued)
Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
ITE A--be T-1 Trip Tltltlm art An-A Gas Gas T.. 2009
LUC Land Use Unit Trip Rate Trip Rate Source Trip Length So-, i Trip, 'K Ne,Trips So-1 Net VNIT P Annual Sal,s Ta, 'mp"'t Ad pted I
Trip Length Length C." T.. Credit Sales Tax Cr,d it Tl Credit I_
Change
RETAIL:
820 Retail 1,000 gO 42.70 ITE 9th Edition 2.64 3.14 FL Curve 73% FL Curve 34.03 $10,680 $207 $3,814 $109 $506 $4,320
$6,36D $3,163 101%
944/ Blend FE 9th&FL
946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 157.33 Studies 1.90 2.40 FL Studies 23% FL Studies 28.43 $8,923
$184 $3,390 $97 $451 $3,841 $5,082 $5,587 -9%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 28.25 Studies 4.60 5.10 FL Studies 79% FL Studies 42.45 $13,324 $241 $4,440 $127
$590 $5,030 $8,294 $10,108 -18%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
932 Restaurant 1,000 sf 116.60 Studies 3.17 3.67 FL Studies 71% FL Studies 108.52 $34,060 $643 $11,847 $338 $1,570
$13,417 $20,643 $22,152 -7%--
Word ITE 9th&FL
934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thm 1,000 sf 511.00 Studies 2.05 2055 FL Studies 58% FL Studies 251.23 $78,855 $1,600 $29,479
$842 $3,912 $33,391 $45,464 $34,781 31%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 1 103,38 Studies 1 2.08 2.58 1 FL Studies 56% FL Studies 49.79 $15,628 $316 $5,822 $166
$771 $6,593 $9,035 $11,179 -19%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
942 Automobile Rep,, BoShop 1,000 sf 31.43 Studies 3.62 4.12 FL Studies 72% FL Studies 33.87 $10,632 $197 $3,630 $104
$483 $4,113 $6,519 $7,830 -17%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
947 Self-Service Car Wash ce bay 43.94 Studies 2.18 2.68 FL Studies 68% FL Studies 26.93 $8,454 $170 $3,132 $89 $413
$3,545 $4,909 $14,589 -66%
Blend ITE 9th&FL
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 775.14 Studies 1.51 2.01 FL Studies 28% FL Studies 135.52 $42,534 $924 $17,024
$486 $2,258 $19,282 $23,252 $25,430 -9%
890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 ITE 9th Edition 6.09 6.59 FL Studies 54% FL Studies 1 6.88 1 $2,160 $38 1 $700 1 $20 1
$93 1 $793 1 $1,367 $1,373 0%
RECREATIONAL:
430 Golf Course hole 35.74 ITE 9th Edition 6.62 7.12 Same as LUC 210 9091. FL Schedules 88.05 $27,636 $485 $8,936 $255 $1,185
$10,121 $17,515 $11,248 56%
492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 32.93 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 94% FL Studies 65.92 $20,690 $370
$6,817 $195 $906 $7,723 $12,967 $10,824 20%
412 County Park acht 2.28 ITE 9th Edition 5.11 5.61 FL Schedules 90% FL Schedules 4.34 $1,361 $24 $442 $13 $60 $502
$859 $718 20%
491 Tennis Court court 38.70 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 94% Same.,-LUC 492 7747 $24,315 $435 $8,015 $229
$1,064 $9,079 $15,236 $12,180 2591.
420 Manna boat berth 2.96 ITE 9th Edition 6.62 1 7.12 Same as LUC 210 90% FL Schedules 7.29 $2,289 $40 1 $737 1 $21 $96 1
$835 $1,454 $973 49%
GOVERNMENTAL:
2009 IRC Transp.
732 Post Office 1,000 sf 108.19 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 730 3S% Impact Fee Study 80.64 $25,310 $453 $8,346 $238 $1,106
$9,452 $15,858 $14,199 12%
2009 IRC Transp.
590 Libey Lib1,000 sf 56.24 ITE 9th Edition 6.62 7.12 Same as LUC 210 85% Impact Fee Study 130.86 $41,072 $721 $13,284 $379 $1,761
$15,045 $26,027 $17,925 45%
733 G-rument Office Comlex 1,000 sf 27.92 ITE 9th Edition SAS 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 54.70 $17,169 $307 $5,656
$162 $7S3 $6,409 $10,760 $9,632 12%
2005 BC Impact
571 Jail bed 5.50 Fee Study 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 10.78 $3,382 $61 $1,124 $32 $149 $1,273
$2,109 $389 442%
MISCELLANEOUS:
Blend ITE 9th&FL
565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 71.88 Studies 2.03 2.53 FL Studies 73% FL Studies 44.05 $13,825 $281 $5,177 $148 $688
$5,865 $7,960 $8,847 -10%
610 Hospital 1,000 sf 13.22 ITE 9th Edition 6.62 7.12 Same as LUC 210 77% FL Schedules 27.86 $8,746 $153 $2,819 $Bl $376
$3,195 $5,551 $5,309 5%
Same as LUC 630 Same as LUC 630
640 Veterinary Clinic)"I 1,000 sf 40.12 ITE 9th Edition 5.10 5.60 Ise,Appendix B) 93% Isee A pendia BI 78.68 $24,697 $442 $8,144
$233 $1,082 $9,226 $15,471 $3,511 341% 1l
560 Church 1,000 sf 9.11 ITE 9th Edition 3.90 4.40 FL Schedules 90% FLSchedules 13.22 $4,150 $76 $1,400 $40 $186 $1,586
$2,564 $2,588 -1%
Blend ITE 6th&FL
444 Movie Theater /Matinee scroen 106.63 Studies 2022 2072 FL Studies 88% FL Studies 86.14 $27,036 $540 $9,949 $284
$1,319 $11,268 $15,768 $22,743 -31%
520 Elements Srhool Private,K-5) 1 student 1 1.29 1 ITE 9th Edition 4.30 4.80 FL Schedules 801% FL Schedules 1 1.83 1 $576 $30 $184
$6 $26 $212 $364 $149 144%
522 Middle School Private,6-8 student 1 1.62 1 TE 9th Edition 4.30 4.80 FL Schedules 90% FL Schedules 1 2.59 $814 $15 $2]6
$8 $3] $313 $SDI $149 236%
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 E-2 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table E-1(continued)
Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule
LUC Trip R—So— Trip L—gth L.ng,h Trip L—gth So,— 1. Trip, %V—Trip,S111- N,t VMT"i Co't T- C,rdit S.1-T- Cr,dit T-1 Cr,d it Nor lo,pacl Ad,ptud
MISQIIANEOUS:
530 Hi h School(Private,9-12) student 1.71 ITE 9th Edition 4.30 4.80F
Schedules 90% FL Schedules 2.74 $859 $16 $295 $8 $37 $332 $527 $538 -2%
540/ University/Junior College(],500 or fevrerstutlentsl ITE Regression
550 (Private) student 2.00 Anal sis 6.62 7.12 as LUC 210 9095 FL Schedules 4.93 $1,54] I $2] I $497 $14 $65 $562
$985 $653 51%
2005 IRC Impact 20091RC Tansp. 2009(RC T—sp.
n/a Fire Station 1,000 0 5.40 Fee Study 2.02 2.52 Impact Fee Study 89% Impact Fee Study 4.01 $1,260 $26 $479 $13 $60
$539 $721 $983 -27%
(1) Net VMT is calculated as((Trip Generation Rate`Trip Length*%New Trips)•(1-I nterstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor)/2).This reflects the unit of vehicle miles of capacity
consumed per unit of development and is multiplied by the cost per vehicle
(2) Source:Indian River County Planning Division.Fees do not include the administrative charge
(3) The walk-in bank land use was added back into the ITE 9t°edition handbook,as it was removed from ITE 8`h edition.The recommended trip generation rate is based on the peak
hour of adjacent street traffic(one hour between 4pm and 6pm)multiplied by 10
(4) The trip generation rate recommended for the veterinary clinic is based on the peak hour of adjacent street traffic from ITE 9rh edition,multiplied by 30
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 E-3 Impact Fee Update Study
N
L
oC
Appendix F
Building and Land Values Supplemental Information for
Correctional, Law Enforcement, Emergency Services, Public
Buildings, Library, Solid Waste and Parks and Recreation
Impact Fees
z y4
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
This Appendix provides a summary of building and land value estimates for all impact fee
program areas with the exception of transportation and educational facilities. Information
related to transportation cost estimates is included in Appendix C and cost estimates for
educational facilities are included in Appendix G.
Building Values
For all of the program areas, the following information was reviewed to estimate building
values:
• Recent construction completed by Indian River County(if any);
• Estimates for any planned facilities;
• Insurance values of existing facilities;
• Data from other jurisdictions for recently completed facilities; and
• Discussions with architects/contractors.
The following paragraphs provide a summary for each program area.
Correctional Facilities
As presented in Table F-1, the construction cost associated with the County's most recent
jail addition (completed in 2008) was $288 per square foot. There are no estimates
available for future jail additions, and the insurance values of the existing jail buildings
ranged from $140 to $220 per square foot. It is important to note insurance values are
considered to provide estimates below the full cost since they typically do not take into
consideration certain building components, such as foundation, architectural/design cost,
furniture/fixture/equipment, security features, etc.
Recent jail construction in other Florida counties and estimates obtained from construction
companies and architects suggested a range of$225 to $445 per square foot. Given all this
information, a unit cost of $250 per square foot for jail buildings is used in the study. This
figure is approximately 8 percent higher than that used in the 2005 study ($232 per square
foot) and 22 percent lower that the figure used in the 2007 impact fee study ($321 per
square foot). Given that the most recent jail construction in Indian River County was
completed at a cost of $288 per square foot, $250 per square foot represents a
conservative estimate.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-1 Impact Fee Update Study
29D
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table F-1
Correctional Facilities Building Value
Source Year Building Cost per
Square ..
Construction of IRCJai I Unit EM 2008 $288
Estimates for a Future Jail N/A N/A
Insurance Values of Existing Jail Buildings(2) 2013 $140-$220
Recent Jail Construction in Other Florida Counties(3) 2009,2013 $225
Estimates from National Construction Companies(4) 2013 $270-$300
Estimates from Florida Architects(5) 2013 $285-$445
Used in the Study 2013 $250
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Source: Indian River County,figures rounded to nearest$10
(3) Source:AJAX Engineering and Florida Department of Correctional Facilities,figures rounded to
nearest$10
(4) Source:Reed Construction
(5) Based on discussions with industry architects for a range of a typical jail in Florida based on their
experience
To determine the building value of the support facilities, such as the guard house,
maintenance shop, etc., insurance value of the existing buildings was reviewed. This
analysis suggested a unit cost of$125 per square foot.
Emergency Services Facilities
As part of this analysis, TOA contacted several Florida jurisdictions to obtain more recent
cost information. The bids and estimates received in 2010 for facilities built in 2010 or 2012
range from $190 to $300 per square foot (excluding furniture/fixture/equipment, site
preparation cost, permits, fees and other similar expenses). The following chart presents
the building construction cost trends based on bids, estimates, and other information
obtained during the previous impact fee studies completed by TOA. As presented, the
variation in station costs is relatively minor over the past few years.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-2 Impact Fee Update Study
25-k
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Figure F-1
Fire/EMS Station Construction Cost per Square Foot
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Fire station construction cost data collected from Florida jurisdictions
In determining the appropriate unit cost for station construction in Indian River County, in
addition to these trends, the following data was evaluated:
• The most recent fire station expansion and renovation project cost was
approximately$300 per square foot (Stations 9 and 12).
• The County's current Capital Improvement Plan includes an estimate ranging from
$280 to$325 for a prototype fire station.
• The insurance value of existing fire stations is $190 per square foot, which is
considered to be a conservative value.
Based on the information summarized in Table F-2, a unit cost of$260 per square foot is
used for fire station building value. This figure is based primarily on local construction cost
and estimates in Indian River County and is also consistent with statewide trends. Finally, it
is almost the same unit value used in the 2005 study and approximately 5 percent lower
than that used in the 2007 study($273 per square foot).
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-3 Impact Fee Update Study
2S"1
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table F-2
Fire Station Building Value
Source Year Building Cost per
Square ..
Expansion of Stations 9 and 12(1) 2010 $300
Estimates for Stations 13 and 1412l FY 2013-FY 2017 $280 to$325
Insurance Values of Existing Fire Stations(3) 2013 $190
Recent Fire Station Construction in Other Florida Counties(4) 2010-2012 $190-$300
Estimates from Florida Architects(5) 2013 $230-$280
Used in the Study 2013 $260
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Source: Indian River County Capital Improvement Plan
(3) Source: Indian River County,figures rounded to nearest$10
(4) Source: Individual jurisdictions
(5) Based on discussions with industry architects for a range of a typical fire station in Florida based on their
experience(includes adjustment for ff&e,site preparation, permits,etc.)
In addition to fire stations, the Emergency Services building inventory includes the Training
Tower, which was built in 2008. The tower was built for $150 per square foot, which is also
used in the impact fee calculations.
Law Enforcement
Law enforcement buildings tend to include a wide range of buildings, such as office
buildings, crime scene buildings, maintenance sheds, etc. In addition, law enforcement
facilities tend to include both prime buildings and support buildings, which tend to vary
significantly in terms of building cost. Given this, it is difficult to have a comparable cost
database from other jurisdictions since the combination of these different types of buildings
vary from one jurisdiction to another. Therefore, the estimates used in the impact fee
calculations relied primarily on local data.
As presented in Table F-3, the County recently completed the conversion of a warehouse to
a Crime Scene Investigation Center, at a cost of almost $200 per square foot. In addition,
the estimates obtained from the Sheriff's Master Plan for a future Sheriff's Office Building
and a new Crime Scene Unit Facility range from $250 to $300 per square foot. The
insurance values of existing buildings average$165 per square foot and the value of support
facilities is $65 per square foot. Finally, the available data from other Florida jurisdictions
suggests a range of$175 to$270 per square foot for law enforcement facilities.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-4 Impact Fee Update Study
ZS3
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Given this data, the value of prime buildings is estimated at $200 per square foot and the
support buildings at $50 per square foot. The value for support buildings took into
consideration the insurance values of not only law enforcement support buildings, but also
those of public buildings, as presented in Table F-4. These unit figures provided a weighted
average cost of $197 per square foot, which is 50 percent higher than the value included in
the 2005 study, which was based on historical costs provided by the County and is the same
value included in the 2007 study.
Table F-3
Law Enforcement Building Value
Building Cost per
Source Year Square ..
Construction of Crime Scene Investigation Center(l) 2013 $197
Future Planned Facilities(2) N/A $250 to$300
Insurance Values of Existing Buildings(prime)13� 2013 $
Insurance Values of Existing Buildings(support)(') 2013 $665
5
Recent Public Building Construction in Other Florida Countiesls� 2010-2012 $175-$270
Used in the Study--Prime Buildings 2013 $2�
Used in the Study—Support Buildings 2013 $50
(1) Source: Indian River County
(2) Source: Indian River County Sheriff's Master Plan
(3) Source: Indian River County,includes buildings for which information was available
(4) Source:Indian River County,includes buildings for which information was available
(5) Recent impact fee studies,represents weighted average of prime and support buildings
Public Buildings
Similar to law enforcement buildings, public buildings also tend to include a wide range of
buildings, such as offices, courthouses, maintenance buildings, parking garages, etc. as well
as prime versus support buildings. The most recent public buildings constructed in Indian
River County were completed in 2007. Given the changes in construction costs since then,
these cost figures were considered outdated and not used. The County has plans to add
approximately 10,000 square feet of courtroom space over the next five years, and the cost
associated with this expansion is estimated at $200 per square foot. As presented in Table
F-4, the insurance value of existing prime buildings averaged $210 per square foot and
support buildings averaged $46 per square foot. Finally, the building value of prime and
support facilities in other Florida jurisdictions for which information was available, range
from $135 to $200 per square foot.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc.
Indian River County
June 2014 F-5 Impact Fee Update Study
ZS�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Given this information, the building value of prime facilities is estimated at $210 per square
foot and support buildings at $50 per square foot. This results in a weighted average value
of$167 per square foot for all buildings, which is within the range of other jurisdiction. It is
also almost the same figure as that used in the 2005 study ($169 per square foot) and
approximately 25 percent lower than the figure used in the 2007 study ($226 per square
foot).
Table F-4
Value of Public Buildings
BuildingCostper
Source Year Square ..
Future Planned Facilities(l) N/A $200
Insurance Values of Existing Buildings(prime)I2) 2013 $210
Insurance Values of Existing Buildings(support)(3) 2013 $46
Recent Public Building Construction in Other Florida Counties(4) 2010-2012 $135-$200
Used in the Study--Prime Buildings 2013 $210
Used in the Study--Support Buildings 2013 $50
(1) Source: Indian River County Capital Improvement Plan
(2) Source:Indian River County,includes buildings for which information was available
(3) Source:Indian River County,includes buildings for which information was available
(4) Source: Recent impact fee studies,represents weighted average of prime and support buildings
Libraries
The most recent library construction in Indian River County was completed in 2009 for a
building cost of $263 per square foot. The current average insurance value of existing
libraries is $206 per square foot, which tends to represent a conservative estimate. Finally,
recent library construction in other Florida jurisdictions provided an average building cost of
$245 per square foot. Given this information, a building value of $240 per square foot is
used in the library impact fee calculations. This figure is almost same as that used in the
2005 study ($242 per square foot) and represents a decrease of approximately 20 percent
from the 2007 study($296 per square foot).
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-6 Impact Fee Update Study
zs-5-
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table F-5
Library Building Value BuildingCostper
Source Year Square ..
Construction of Brackett Library'li
2 $263
Insurance Values of Existing Libraries�Z�
2013 $206
(3) 2010-2012 $245
Recent Library Construction in Other Florida Counties
2013 $240
Used in the Study
(1) Source:Indian River County
(2) Source: Indian River County
(3) Source:Recent impact fee studies
Parks& Recreation Facilities
t fee inventory includes several recreational
The parks and recreation facilities impac
facilities. The value of these facilities is based on insurance values, information from other
jurisdictions and discussions with the County staff.
Solid Waste Facilities
The solid waste impact fee inventory includes several customer care centers. Due to the
limited information on these facilities, the value is based on the recent reconstruction and
expansion of Oslo Convenience Center at a cost of$2.6 million.
Land Values
For each impact fee program area, land values were determined based on the following
analysis, as data available:
• Recent land purchases for the related infrastructure (if any);
• Value of current parcels as reported by the Indian River County Property Appraiser;
• Value of vacant land by size and by land use; and
• Vacant land sales over the past three years by size and by land use.
It should be noted that the land value and sales analysis suggested that sales data indicates
raiser's database for those vacant
higher values than estimates included in the Property App
properties that have not been sold for a while. This may be due to a lag in the update of
land values. The following paragraphs summarize the data used for each program area.
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. F-7 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
�SZ
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Correctional Facilities
The land value estimate for correctional facilities was provided by the County during the
2005 study ($35,000 per acre) and was based on the sale of vac 18 1000 per acre).and for 4- to 6We t
parcels in West Indian River County (IRC) during the 2007 study ($ 4
IRC is defined as the area between 58th Avenue and County Road 512 and represents the
area where the County is likely to build future facilities. To provide an apples-to-apples
comparison to the 2007 study, vacant land sales for parcels with 4 to 6 acres in West IRC
was conducted and supplemented with additional analysis, which is summarized in Table F-
6.
The County has not purchased any land for correctional facilities since 2005 and the recent
jail expansions were located on the existing Jail/Sheriff Complex. As presented in Table F-6,
the value of parcels where the current facilities are located is approximately $46,000 per
acre. To supplement this figure, TOA conducted an analysis of vacant land sales and values
based on the data included in the Indian River County Property Appraiser database.
Vacant land sales and values were evaluated by land use (residential vs. all land uses) and
by size. As mentioned previously, this analysis suggested that sales data indicates higher
values than estimates included in the Property Appraiser's database for those properties
that have not been sold for a while.
Because correctional facilities do not have to be located in centralized areas, it is thought to
be appropriate to evaluate values of residential properties, which tend to be lower than
those for commercial properties. In addition, values of all land uses are also provided. In
terms of size, because the current facilities are located on parcels with 10 to 15 acres,
values and sales of similar size parcels were evaluated.
Given that the land of current facilities is valued at $46,000 per acre, sales of 4 to 6-acre
parcels suggested an average price of$51,000 per acre, and the remaining analysis provided
a range of$13,000 per acre to $124,000 per acre for residential properties, an average land
value of $50,000 per acre for correctional facilities is found to be a reasonable estimate.
This figure represents an increase of approximately 40 percent from the 2005 study and a
decrease of 70 percent from the 2007 study.
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 F 8
�S7
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table F-6
Land Value Analysis-Correctional Facilities
(1) Year Average Land Value
Variable per Acre
Value of Current Parcels 2013 $45,600
Value of Vacant Land:
West IRC-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $12,855
-6 to 15 acres 2013 $18,105
- 15 to 20 acres 2013 $21,353
WestIRC-AllLand Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $15,727
2013 $24,376
-6 to 15 acres
2013 $22,622
-15 to 20 acres
Countywide-Residential
2013 $21,884
-4 to 6 acres
2013 $24,620
-6 to 15 acres
2013 $26,160
- 15 to 20 acres
Countywide-All Land Uses
2013 $26,741
-4 to 6 acres
-6t 15 acres 2013 $32,543
- 15 to 20 acres 2013 $31,644
Vacant Land Sales:
West IRC-Residential
-4to 6 acres 2010-2012 $43,238
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $59,271
2010-2012 $95,109
- 15 to 20 acres
West IRC-All Land Uses
-4to 6 acres 2010-2012 $51,252
-6to 15 acres 2010-2012 $56,403
2010-2012 $97,836
- 15 to 20 acres
Countywide-Residential
-4to 6 acres 2010-2012 $42,109
-6to 15 acres 2010-2012 $61,063
2010-2012 $124,315
- 15 to 20 acres
Countywide-All Land Uses
-4 to'6 acres 2010-2012 $49,868
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $63,042
- 15 to 20 acres 2010-2012 $130,357
Used in the Study
2013 $50,000
(1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 F-9
257
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Law Enforcement
The most recent land purchase for law enforcement facilities was made in 2011, for a price
of $355,000 per acre. However, because the parcel included structures, this price is
considered to be higher than what the County is likely to pay in the future for vacant land.
Discussions with the County and Sheriff's Office suggested that future expansions outlined
in the Master Plan are likely to be located on the existing Jail/Sheriff's Complex and the
recently purchased land. The current value of existing parcels is approximately $50,000 per
acre based on information obtained from the Indian River County Property Appraiser.
Given this and the range of related vacant land values and sales is of $13,000 per acre to
$66,000 per acre, an estimate of$50,000 per acre is used for land value in the
calculation
of
law enforcement impact fee. This figure represents an increase of approxY
40
percent from the 2005 study ($35,000 per acre) and a decrease of 70 percent from the 2007
study ($184,000 per acre).
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014 F-10
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table F-7
Land Value Analysis-Law Enforcement Facilities
Variable(l) Year Average Land
Value per Acre
Value of Current Parcels 2013 $50,702
Cost of Recent Land Purchases(2) 2011 $355,104
Value of Vacant Land:
West IRC-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $12,855
-6 t 15 acres 2013 $18,105
West IRC-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $15,727
-6 to 15 acres 2013 $24,376
Unincorporated-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $18,754
-6 to 15 acres 2013 $20,824
Unincorporated-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $23,844
-6 to 15 acres 2013 $29,338
Vacant Land Sales:
West IRC-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $43,238
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $59,271
West IRC-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $51,252
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $56,403
Unincorporated-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $42,614
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $62,617
Unincorporated-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $50,480
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $66,238
Used in the Study 2013 $50,000
(1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database
(2) Source: Indian River County Sheriff's Office,the parcel included structures
Emergency Services
Typically, fire stations need to be located at or near major intersections and not in
residential areas, for better access and minimum disturbance. As such, land value of these
facilities tends to be higher. This can be seen in the current land value of existing fire
stations at $102,000 per acre with a range of $16,000 per acre to $171,000 per acre. The
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-11 Impact Fee Update Study
ZUa
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
County purchased land for Station 13 in 2010 at a cost of $121,000 per acre. This
information along with relevant vacant land value and sales information are summarized in
Table F-8.
Table F-8
Land Value Analysis-Emergency Services Facilities
Variable(l) Year Average Land
Value per Acre
Value of Current Parcels 2013 $101,802
Cost of Recent Land Purchases(2) 2010 $120,517
Value of Vacant Land:
West IRC-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $12,855
-6 to 15 acres 2013 $18,105
West IRC-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $15,727
-6 to 15 acres 2013 $24,376
Countywide-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $21,884
-6 to 15 acres 2013 $24,620
Countywide-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $26,741
-6 to 15 acres 2013 $32,543
Vacant Land Sales:
West IRC-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $43,238
-6 t 15 acres 2010-2012 $59,271
West IRC-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $51,252
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $56,403
Countywide -Residential
-4to6acres 2010-2012 $42,109
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $61,063
Countywide-All Land Uses
-4 t 6 acres 2010-2012 $49,868
-6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 1 $63,042
Used in the Study 2013 $60,000
(1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database
(2) Source: Indian River County; Represents land purchase for Station 13,made in 2010.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-12 Impact Fee Update Study
Z41
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Given this information, the high end of vacant land sales ($60,000 per acre) is used for the
value of land for emergency services impact fee calculations. This figure is lower than the
value of land where existing stations are located and represents a 30-percent decrease from
the 2005 study and a 60-percent decrease from the 2007 study.
Public Buildings
Public buildings include a range of facilities from County offices and courthouses that need
to be in central locations to maintenance facilities that have more flexibility in location.
Given that the County has not bought any land for public buildings recently and
programmed capital expansions will take place on existing land, the land value of parcels
where the existing buildings are located is evaluated, which averaged $89,615. This value is
used in the impact fee calculations, and represents a decrease of 12 percent from the 2005
study and 50 percent decrease from the 2007 study.
Libraries
As presented in Table F-9, the current value of land where existing libraries are located
averages $38,000, with a range of$15,000 per acre to $330,000 per acre. This information
along with the vacant sales values of 4 to 6-acre parcels suggests that an average land value
of$50,000 per acre is a reasonable estimate. This figure is 50 percent lower than that used
in the 2005 study and 75 percent lower than the 2007 study.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-13 Impact Fee Update Study
ZL Z
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table F-9
Land Value Analysis- Libraries
Variable(l) Year Average Land
Value per Acre
Value of Current Parcels 2013 $38,929
Value of Vacant Land:
West IRC-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $12,855
West IRC-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $15,727
Countywide-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $21,884
Countywide-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2013 $26,741
Vacant Land Sales:
West IRC-Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $43,238
West IRC-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $51,252
Countywide -Residential
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $42,109
Countywide-All Land Uses
-4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $49,868
Used in the Study 2013 $50,000
(1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database
Parks
Indian River County's parks inventory includes parcels ranging from 0.3 acres to 140 acres.
As such, a more detailed land value analysis was conducted, as shown in Table F-10. The
value of current inventory averages $31,000 per acre. Given that the land values and sales
for different acreage groupings range from $17,000 per acre to $100,000 per acre, an
average value of $50,000 per acre is found to be a reasonable estimate for impact fee
calculation purposes. This represents a 45 percent increase from the 2005 study and a 10
percent decrease from the 2007 study.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-14 Impact Fee Update Study
2 43
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table F-10
Land Value Analysis- Parks
2013 PA Just Values p. Acre
Acreage (Residential)(')
West IRC Unincorporated
0.5 to 4 acres $29,474 $94,797
4 to 6 acres $12,855 $18,754
6 to 15 acres $18,105 $20,824
15 to 25 acres $21,353 $22,985
20 to 60 acres $18,612 $17,334
40 to 130 acres 1 $19,8511 $18,754
UnincorporatedAcreage 2013 Sales per Acre(Residential)(')
West IRC
0.5 to 4 acres $100,046 $147,086
4 to 6 acres $43,238 $42,614
6 to 15 acres $59,271 $62,617
15 to 25 acres $95,109 $84,919
20 to 60 acres 1 $74,8771 $64,131
40 to 130 acres $47,1971 $41,018
Used in the Study 1 $50,000
(1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database
Solid Waste
The inventory of solid waste facilities includes only the customer convenience centers used
by residential land uses. These facilities are typically built on previous landfills. Given the
unique nature of these facilities, the current value of parcels where existing centers are
located is used in the study,which averaged $20,000 per acre.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 F-15 Impact Fee Update Study
2G�i
Appendix G
Educational Facilities Impact Fee:
Supplemental Information
z&,5
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
This appendix presents the inventory of traditional schools in Indian River County as well as
an explanation of building and land value estimates used in the impact fee calculations.
School District Inventory
The current inventory of traditional schools in Indian River County is presented in Table G-1.
Table G-1
Indian River County School District Existing School Inventory
SchoolsPermanent Permanent FISH
Number
Stations FISH capacity Net Square
Elementary Schools
1 Beachland Elementary K-5 543 543 94,544
2 Citrus Elementary K-5 556 556 74,775
3 Dodgertown Elementary PK-5 560 560 117,305
4 Fellsmere Elementary PK-5 546 546 q74
5 Glendale Elementary K-5 612 612
6 Highlands Elementary K-5 619 619
7 Liberty Magnet K-5 666 666
8 Osceola Magnet(NEW) K-5 557 557
9 Pelican Island Elementary K-5 573 573
10 Rosewood Elementary K-5 543 543 84,042
11 Sebastian Elementary K-5 637 637 85,825
12 Treasure Coast Elementary PK-5 553 553 94,719
13 Vero Beach Elementary PK-5 796 796 106,460
Subtotal-Elementary Schools gii7,761 7,761 1,122,710
Middle schools
1 Gifford Middle School 6-8 1,136 1,022 135,033
6-8 1,140 1,026 152,045
2 Oslo Middle School
M3Sebastian River Middle School6 8 1,107 996 147,706
rove Middle School 6-8 1,382 1,244 167,794l-Middle Schools4765 4288 602'578hools
an River High School 9-12 2,440 2,318 344,334
Vero Beach High School(Main Campus) 9-12 2,200 2,090 352,408
2 Vero Beach High School(Freshman Learning Center) 9-12 870 827 129,987
Subtotal-High Schools 5,510 5,235 826,729
Grand Total-All Schools 18,036 17,284 2,552,017
Source: Indian River School District
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-1 Impact Fee Update Study
2(<4
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Building Cost Analysis
To determine the architectural, civil design, site improvement, construction, and FF&E costs
associated with building a new school in Indian River County, the following information was
evaluated:
• Recently built schools in Indian River County;
• Cost estimates included in the Educational Plant Survey;
• Insurance values of the existing schools;
• Cost related information provided by the Indian River County School District; and
• School cost information for 135 schools in other Florida counties.
The following paragraphs provide further detail on this research and analysis.
Construction Cost
The last schools built in Indian River County included the replacement of Vero Beach
Elementary School in 2012 and the construction of a new middle school (Storm Grove
Middle School) in 2009. The cost associated with these schools ranged from $156 per net
square foot for the elementary school to $241 per net square foot for the middle school, as
shown in Table G-2. In addition, the District's Educational Plant Survey includes several
school expansion projects. The estimated cost associated with these expansions ranges
from $228 per net square foot to $343 per net square foot. Discussions with the School
District confirmed that there were certain elements unique to the Storm Grove Middle
School, which resulted in higher cost and the additions tend to be more expensive than new
school construction. Finally, the insurance values of existing school buildings range from
approximately $145 per net square foot for elementary schools to $185 per net square foot
for high schools, with an average of $165 per net square foot for all traditional schools.
These figures are consistent with the construction costs observed in other jurisdictions.
Table G-3 summarizes data obtained from the Florida Department of Education for schools
built in 2011. As shown, the average construction cost is approximately $175 per net
square foot, with a range of $145 per net square foot for elementary schools to $200 per
net square foot for high schools.
Given this data and information, average construction costs of $145 per net square foot for
elementary schools, $175 per net square foot for middle schools, and $185 per net square
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-2 Impact Fee Update Study
�LZ
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
foot for high schools are used in this study, which is based on the insurance values that are
also consistent with costs obtained from other Florida jurisdictions and represent a
conservative estimate.
Table G-2
Construction Cost Analysis—Indian River County
Year Construction Net Constrution
Built Cost Square Feet(4) Cost per NSF
2009 IStorm Grove Middle School $34,106,673 141,066 $242
2012 JVero Beach Elementary $17,243,103 110,495 $156
Educational Plant Survey Estimates for School Additions(6) $228-$343
Insurance Values of Existing School Buildings:(')
- Elementary Schools $146
- Middle Schools $175
- High Schools $186
-All Traditional Schools $165
(1),(2),(3),(4) Source: Indian River County School District
(5)Construction cost(Item 3)divided by net permanent square feet(Item 4)
(6)Source: IRC School District Educational Plant Five Year Survey Report,August 23,2013
(7)Source:IRC Statement of Values for School Facilities,2013
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-3 Impact Fee Update Study
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table G-3
Construction Cost Analysis—Other Florida Jurisdictions Construction
Year Built County Facility Name/Type Construction Total Cost Net Sq.Ft. Cost per
Cost Net SF
Elementary Schools
2011 Charlotte Meadow Park Elementary $12,696,116 $18,415,280 89,652 $142
2011 Duval Waterleaf Elementary $14,882,021 $24,786,442 82,062 $181
2011 Escambia Global Learning Academy $17,019,155 $24,108,501 120,015 $142
2011 Osceola Highlands Elementary $14,534,309 $18,145,244 106,918 $136
2011 Pasco lConnerton Elementary"R" gIL98,5901 9,102,688 84,972 $136
Total/Weighted AverageElementarySchools $70,730,191 1551 483,619 $146
Middle Schools
2011 Dade North Dade Middle $18,921,534 $21,216,883 94,660 $200
2011 Orange Lake Nona Middle $16,923,455 $23,466,083 149,897 $113
2011 Polk Boone Middle $17,900,963 $20,312,468 69,921 $256
2011 Walton Emerald Coast Middle $15,918,884 $25,134,830 126,770 $126
Total/Weighted Average--Middle Schools $69,664,8361 $K130,2641 441,248 $158
High Schools
2011 Broward Lanier James Education Center $8,889,147 $12,412,686 42,608 $209
2011 Calhoun Blountstown High $19,407,910 $25,135,928 100,366 $193
2011 Charlotte Charlotte High $61,755,842 $92,390,747 258,700 $239
2011 Dade International Studies SHS $7,192,325 $21,846,054 35,137 $205
2011 Dade Medical Academy or Science and Technology $9,303,705 $18,811,197 78,845 $118
2011 Okeechobee Okeechobee Achievement Academy $5,499,975 $6,696,931 43,024 $128
2011 Polk Auburndale Senior $19,522,053 $24,482,933 101,466 $192
2011 Polk Davenport School of the Arts $29,136,512 $32,548,129 157,446 $185
2011 Polk Kathleen Senior $24,323,662 $27,493,666 112,017 $217
2011 jPolk lWinter Haven Senior $26,374,234 $29,588,106 140,940 $187
Total/Weighted Average--High Schools $211,405,365 $291,406,377 1,070,549 $197
Total/Weighted Average(All Schools) $351,800,392 $486,094,796 1,995,416 $176
Source: Florida Department of Education
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-4 Impact Fee Update Study
-U
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Architectural, Civil Design, Site Preparation, Furniture, Fixture and Equipment Costs
The architectural, civil design, site preparation (including on-site improvement and traffic
control costs), and FF&E costs (including technology) are calculated based on the ratio of
these costs to the construction costs observed in Indian River County and other
jurisdictions. These figures were also discussed with the District's representatives and are
estimated at 10 percent of construction for architectural/civil design costs, 10 percent for
site preparation costs, and 7 percent for FF&E costs. Tables G-4 and G-5 summarize the
data obtained from Indian River County and other jurisdictions.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-5 Impact Fee Update Study
274
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table G-4
Architectural/Civil Design and FF&E Cost Analysis
Indian River County and Other Florida Jurisdictions
Ratio of Arch itect Ratio of FF&E to
Year District Type Facility Name Construction Cost Architect&Eng &Eng Fees to FF&E Construction
Fee, Construction Cost Cost
2008 Leon Elem Conley Elementary School $22,234,8661 1275,420 6% $1977,175 9%
2008 Broward Elem Colbert Elementary $3576065 $680,317 19% $213389 6%
2008 Charlotte Elem Peace River Elementary School $16,470888 $1,164074 7% $293,047 2%
2008 Citrus Elem Central Ridge Elementar $20,066,027 $1,293,378 6% $682,662 3%
2008 Clay Elem OakLeaf Village Elementar $22067755 $1132542 5% $1497860 7%
2008 Clay Elem Plantation Oaks Elementary $15,709595 $927,982 6% $900,000 6%
2008 Clay Elem Shadowlawn Elementary $23,666,356 $1,091,411 5% $1544656 7%
2008 Collier Elem Parkside Elementary $21,099,395 $671,650 3% $2665658 13%
2008 Collier Elem Veterans Memorial Elementary $16957,004 $546,022 3% $2625757 15%
2008 Highlands El em Memorial Elementary $10296,575 $749240 7% $1,691,188 16%
2008 Hillsborough El em Kimbell Elementary $10,540,220 $510,924 5% $1,150000 11%
2008 Hillsborough Elem Reddick Elementary $13342,791 $765,913 6% $1,117452 8%
2008 Lake Elem Grass y La ke El ementar $16110171 $607929 4% $1,572,102 10%
2008 Lake Elem Mascotte Charter Elementary $17028,093 $552701 3% $1,414128 8%
2008 lake Elem Minneola Charter Elementary $16,878476 $624283 4% $1,506036 9%
2008 Lake El em Sawrass Bay Elementary $15816096 $472825 3% $1,538,956 10%
2008 Lee Elem Heights Elementary School $21,224,842 $396,000 2% $1,451,720 7%
2008 Lee Elem Treeline Elementary School $15,989,080 $385,950 2% $1,452,508 9%
2008 Orange Elem ConwayElementary School $10,376998 $550000 5% $750000 7%
2008 Orange Elem Lakemont Elementary School $12,830,008 $761020 6% $912,049 7%
2008 Orange Elem7i mber Lakes ElementarySchool $12,465,522 $663,155 5% $968,647 8%
2008 Orange El em Westbrooke El emen la ry School $13259,968 $473,978 4% $1000000 8%
2008 Osceola Elem Flora Ridge Elementar15804425 $414,305 3% $2,161,629 14%
2008 Osceola Elem New ES"J"Ha r mony Ccmmuni $13632,941 $566,980 4% $2,299,583 17%
2008 Pa lm Beach Elem AJlamanda Elementary $23238,839 $1,171581 5% $879820 4%
2008 Palm Beach Elem lForest Park Elementary $24,150,475 $1185476 5% $779,820 3%
2008 rPolk
ch Elem Ha en Ranch Elementar $22,672614 $1267703 6% $971083 4%
2008 ach Elem Palm Beach Gardens Elementary22077886 $1262407 6% 779838 4%
2008 ach Elem Pine Jo Elementary529,144,023 $1358825 5% $992167 3%
2008 ach Elem Westward Elementary $27,207,724 $1,324,188 5% $869,654 3%
2008 ach Elem Sunset Palms Elementary $24,576,913 $1,069387 4% $997,614 4%
2008 El em New River El ementar "M" $11,301,689 $521,935 5% $1,325,467 12%
2008 Elem New Heights El ementar $22,910,850 $1,374287 6% $1,171311 5%
2008 Elem Tarpon Srin sElementar $19675,615 $989498 S% $2,746,022 14%
2008 Elem Horizons Elementary $18,873,956 $557,676 3% $1,642,347 9%
2008 volusia I Elem Pride Elementary"Y" $14935,273 $723,815 5% $1590038 11%
2008 Walton Elem Moss Head School $18827427 $1,021674 5% $578838 3%
2008 St.Lucie High Ft Pierce Central High School $63,908,401 $2,108,410 3% $3 993,169 6%
2008 Broward High West Broward High $74,974472 $2,627,821 4% $5,739011 8%
2008 Franklin High Franklin CountySchools $22,955575 $1,395385 6% $975000 4%
2008 Lee High Island Coast High School $41559854 $1138,351 3% $4,350121 10%
2008 Pasco High Wirerass Ranch High School"CCC" $22,880482 $1,045502 5% $3502243 15%
2008 Polk High Tenoroc Senior $60,017,596 $1,454,175 2% $3,972131 7%
2008 Sarasota High Suncoast Pol techn icaI HighSchool $11730,040 $1030,406 9% $2,160,265 18%
2008 St Johns High Creeks i de Hi hSchcol "DDD" $45425,406 $2,399,921 5% $3,150,626 7%
2008 St.Johns High Ponte Vedra High School CCC $54,638612 $2,115456 4% $3,096,813 6%
2008 Leon Middle Montford Middle School $22008,118 $1345,194 6% $2,049255 9%
2008 Ba Middle Breakfast Point AcademyK-8 $25,975683 $1,463300 6% $1661916 6%
2008 Charlotte Middle Punta Gorda Middle School $23,896506 $1,829098 8% $564072 2%
2008 Collier Middle C ress Palm Middle $26,535164 51654176 6% $3551727 13%
2008 Collier Middle Marco Charter Middle $14,450,518 $580583 4% $539228 4%
2008 Duval Middle North Shore K-8 $25,222118 $1690172 7% $2,651,960 11%
2008 FFIaglerMiddle 3unnell K-8 $17776,495 $1431,966 8% $1,481305 8%
2008 rou h Middle Smith Middle $20,160,152 5969246 5% $2,010,000 10%2008 Middle Oak Hammock Middle School $24359562 $623,895 3%
$1932445 8%
2008 Middle liber Middle $28,242,481 $753275 3%2008 a Middle Woodland MiddleSchool $31,412195 $3004145 10% $2,077,048 7%
2008 Middle Alla attah Flats K-8 $34488,744 $2,109609 6% $4788814 14%
2008 e Middle Palm Pointe Educational Research School at Tradition $24836,235 $1,164,091 5% $4,425642 18%
2009 sa Elem Riversi de El ementar School 511,716,323 $1,448,365 12% $3,066,309 26%
2009 Elem Deer Point Elementar $16646867 $1046,428 6% $1,106071 7%
2009 d Elem Discovery Elementary K-6 $24,813884 $1,017,051 4% $2729823 11%
2009 Broward Elem Heron Heights Elementary $25,377,383 $1,101,087 4% $2,821,297 11%
2009 Charlotte I El em Ea st El ementar $14128364 $1,189449 8% $750,180 5%
2009 Collier Elem Eden Park Elementary K-6 $19625793 $743,765 4% $2824,488 14%
2009 Collier Elem IMilke Davis Elementary $18,747061 $830774 4% $2,390,841 13%
2009 Duval Elem Bartram5 rin sElementar $16349,939 $942,474 6% $1752167 11%
2009 Hillsborou h Elem Bail Elementar $7,308787 $554962 8% $1,475,000 20%
2009 Hillsborough Elem Stowers Elementary $10,360379 $596,594 6% $1,475,000 14%
2009 Lee Elem Hei ghts El ementa ry School $20,794081 $464500 2% $1,635759 8%
2009 Lee Elem Lehi ghEl emen ta ry School $15,702253 $641950 4% $856,087 5%
2009 Manatee Elem G.D.Rogers Garden Elementary $12,223480 $1049,384 9% $788800 6%
2009 Martin El em Citrus Grove Elementary $21,130,325 $1,067331 5% $1,280,297 6%
2009 Orange Elem Keene's Crossing Elementary School $12,452304 $515371 4% $1,196557 10%
2009 Osceola Elem KOA Elementary School(Elem L) $12610702 $621,750 5% $1787818 14%
2009 Osceola Elem Narcoossee Elementar ESM $14770,196 $611,435 4% 51,800,412 12%
2009 Palm Beach Elem C.O.Ta for Kirklane Elementary $35,663420 $1864969 5% $1,013080 3%
2009 Palm Beach Elem Hope-Centennial Elementary $25,030950 $2,092,633 8% $868294 3%
2009 Polk Elem Sessard Holland Elementar $15642049 $572492 4% $1,508553 10%
2009 Sarasota Elem Atwater Elementar School $12524,430 $1,802,665 14% $651817 5%
2009 Vol us is Elem Champion Elementary $14,696164 $725,513 5% $950364 6%
2009 Wakulla Elem Riversink Elementary $15363460 $817,426 5% $967599 6%
2009 Washington Elem Vernon ElementarySchool $6,259105 $492,392 8% $267742 4%
2009 Brevard High Satellite High School $4736903 $225000 5% $358,000 8%
2009 Brevard Hi h Heritage HihSchool $57,088946 $2,328706 4% $5470874 10%
2009 Hillsborou h High Steinbrenner High School $38437165 $1,588553 4% 4945,000 13%
2009 Hillsborou h High StrawberryCrest Hi hSchool $43,204430 $3051,138 7% $4945,000 it%
2009 Oran a High East River High School $58,970282 $1860,628 3% $5304,005 9%
2009 Oran a High La ke Nona Hi hSc hool $60857702 $1,721,299 3% $5,217,696 9%
2009 Sarasota High Suncoast Pal technical High School $11730040 $1030,406 9% $2,160,265 18%
2009 Walton High Walton Senior High $35764,000 $1,992342 6% $645000 2%
2009 Okaloosa Middle Shoal River Middle School $12779,256 $1297594 10% $3229,106 25%
2009 Duval Middle Westview K-8 $29,119287 $2,600,719 9% $3,013,790 10%
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-6 Impact Fee Update Study
271
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table G-4(continued)
Architectural/Civil Design and FF&E Cost Analysis
Indian River County and other Florida Jurisdictions
Ratio of Architect Furtio of FF&E to
Year District Type Facility Name Construction Cost Fees Construction Cost Cost
2009 Hernando Middle Ep7,rer K-8 $41,212,4101 1748,584 4% $3220587 8%
2009 Hillsborou h Middle Barrin ton Middle School $16,315050 $961428 6% $2,259000 14%
2009 lake Middle East Rid eMi ddIe School $27,281965 $1283,420 5% $2,491107 9%
2009 Osceola Middle Westside K-B School $23,051,370 $1,363350 6% $2,686,144 12%
2009 Sarasota Middle Woodland Middle School $31,412,195 $3,004,145 10% $2,077048 7%
2009 St Johns Middle _Liberty Pines Academy K-B $25277,687 $971,288 4% $1,197,445 5%
2010 Broward Elem Norcrest Elementary $22,286,245 $885,319 4% $1,257,845 6%
2010 Collier Elem Palmetto Elementar $20,224743 $889,743 4% $2,671470 13%
2010 lake Elem Sorrento Elemenatr $15842160 $668339 4% $1,896,206 12%
2010
orange
Elem Old Chen /North Fors hElementar $12096,899 $783588 6% $987926 8%
2010 Osceola Elem East Lake Elementar $11,747,305 $537,980 5% $1,885,002 16%
2010 Palm Beach Elem Everglades Elementary $15940134 1863296 12% 1075126 7%
2010 Palm Beach Elem Northboro Elementar $24168,146 $1,990,621 8% $780,037 3%
2010 Palm Beach El em Plumosa Elementary $21038789 $2,075,316 10% 5715049 3%
2010 Seminole Elem New Midwa Elementary $12297322 $810700 7% $1,133,007 9%
2010 Cla High Oakleaf High $50819745 $2,562,240 5% $3,064,772 6%
2010 Duval High Atlantic Coast High 50466294 $5220136 10% 5048820 10%
2010 Hernando High Weeki Watchee High $33,006,787 $1,939097 6% $4,719,813 14%
2010 Sarasota High Riverview High $78,561000 $5,999,998 8% $4,377,536 6%
2010 Collier High Lorenzo Walker Institute ofTechnology High $9843,413 $795,386 8% $1,312,405 13%
2010 Orange High Apopka HS Replacement $70,267,621 52,112,349 3% $4733,044 7%
2010 Palm Beach High Palm Beach Gardens Communi Hi h 75097581 3829735 5% $3330581 4%
2010 Palm Beach Hi h Suncoast Hi h $59972,270 $3,938,916 7% $2,280,000 4%
2010 Volusia High UniversityHigh $72,990,143 $3,092,214 4% $6,096,162 8%
2011 Charlotte Elem Meadow Park Elementary $12696,116 $944,273 7% $674842 5%
2011 Duval Elem Waterleaf Elementar $14,882021 $1,621628 11% $1,899236 13%
2011 Escambia Elem Global Learning Academy $17019155 1682415 10% 2861931 17%
2011 Osceola Elem Hi hlands Elementar $14,534,309 $666,9781 5% $1,650,3 181 11%
2011 Pasco Elem Connerton Elementar "R" $11,598,590 5858,671 7% 51298,389 11%
2011 Calhoun Hi h Blountstown Hi h $19,407910 $1,968,893 10% $994,719 5%
2011 Charlotte I High ICharlotteHigh $61,755842 $6,502,129 11% $2676,408 4%
2011 Broward Inier James Education Center 8889147 1075459 12% 1304137 15%
2011 Dade Hi h International Studies SHS $7,192,325 $684,965 10% $757496 11%
2011 Dade I High IMedical Academy or Science and Technology $9,303,705 $762932 8% $919966 10%
2011 Okeechobee I High Okeechobee Achievement Academ $5,499,975 $453,761 8% $427114 8%
2011 Polk I High JAuburrda l e Seni or $19522053 $1,462146 7% $3124,050 16%
2011 Polk I High I Daven Port School of the Arts $29,136,512 $1,042,674 4% $2,330,971 8%
2011 Palk Hi h Kathleen Senior $24,323 662 $875,094 4% $2,267,250 9%
2011 Polk Hi h Winter Haven Senior $26374234 $853,483 3% $2,360,389 9%
2011Dade Middle North Dade Middle $18,921534 $867900 5% $1,122762 6%
2011 Hernando Middle lWiridingiNaters K-8 $14559,177 $880,709 6% $4279,500 29%
2011 Orange Middle lake Nona Middle $16,923,455 $1,277,253 8% $1,795,567 11%
2011 Polk Middle Boone Middle $17900963 $1080,157 6% $1331,348 7%
2011 Walton Middle Emerald Coast Middle $15918884 $1709689 11% $700000 4%
51 349776 3681013 7% 5 33 13 1
Total Wei hted Avera a $3 66044179 $185 27182 6% $281633327 8%
Tat al Wei hted Avera a IRC Schools ONLY 1%
,Total/Weighted Average Eacludin IRC Schools t3314.694,103 $18214fi 169 S% $276099814 8%
Source:IRC School District for IRC schools;Florida Department of Education for all other jurisdictions
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-7 Impact Fee Update Study 2-7
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table G-5
Site Development Cost Analysis
Indian River County and other Florida Jurisdictions
Ratio of Site
Year District Type Facility Name Construction Cost Site Improv/Devel Development
Construction Cost
2008 Leon Elem Conley Elementary School 1 $22,234,8661 1,363,038 6%
2008 Broward Elem Colbert Elementar $3,576,0651 $54751 2%
2008 Charlotte Elem Peace River Elementary School $16,470,888 $2,026,353 12%
2008 Citrus Elem Central RidgeElementary $20,066,027 $3,200 0%
2008 Clay Elem Plantation Oaks Elementary $15709,595 $2001,795 13%
2008 Collier El em Parkside Elementary $21,099,395 $609,364 3%
2008 Collier Elem Veterans Memorial Elementary $16,957,004 $554,493 3%
2008 Highlands I Elem Memorial Elem ntary $10296,575 $2,623,522 25%
2008 Hillsborough Elem Kimbell Elementary $10,540,220 $798,597 8%
2008 Hillsborou h Elem Reddick Elementary $13,342,791 $692,203 5%
2008 Lee Elem Heights ElementarySchool $21.224,842 $705,540 3%
2008 Lee Elem Treeline Elementary School $15,989,080 $1,494,920 9%
2008 Oran a Elem ConwayElementarySchool $10,376,998 $500,000 5%
2008 Oran a Elem Lakemont Elementary School $12,830008 $300967 2%
2008 Orange Elem ITimber Lakes Elementary School $12,465,522 $1,601,516 13%
2008 Orange Elem Westbrooke Elementary School $13,259,968 $1,145,801 9%
2008 Osceola El em Flora Ride Elementary $15804425 $684259 4%
2008 Osceola Elem New ES"I"(Harmony Community) $13,632,941 $1,300,802 10%
2008 Palm Beach Elem Allamanda Elementary $23,238,839 $2,192,788 9%
2008 Palm Beach El em Forest Park Elementary $24,150475 $3,842794 16%
2008 Palm Beach El em Hagen Ranch Elementary $22,672,614 $4,135,688 18%
2008 Palm Beach El em Palm Beach Gardens Elementary $22,077,886 $3,007,648 14%
2008 Palm Beach El em Pi ne Jog Elementar $29144023 $2874817 10%
2008 Palm Beach Elem Westward Elementary $27,207,724 $705,832 3%
2008 Palm Beach Elem Sunset Palms Elementary $24,576,913 $1,359,139 6%
2008 Pasco Elem New River Elementary"M" $11301,689 $2134030 19%
2008 Pinellas El em New Hei hts Elementar $22,910,850 $2,778,418 12%
2008 Pinellas El em Tarpon Springs Elementary $19,675,615 $2,740,407 14%
2008 Volusia Elem Pride Elementary "Y" $14935273 $1296294 9%
2008 Walton Elem IMossy Head School $18,827,427 $32,000 0%
2008 St.Lucie High IFt.Pierce Central High School $63,908,401 $5,309,308 8%
2008 Broward High 1west Broward High $74974472 $149041 0%
2008 Franklin -High Franklin County Schools $22,955,575 $500,000 2%
2008 Lee High Island Coast High School $41,559,854 $5,418,852 13%
2008 Pasco High Wiregrass Ranch High School"CCC" $22,880,482 $4,536,580 20%
2008 Sarasota High Suncoast Pol technical High School $11,730,040 $1,463,101 12%
2008 Leon Middle Montford Middle School $22,008,118 $39,230 0%
2008 Bay Middle Breakfast Point Academ K-8 $25975,683 $3838363 15%
2008 Charlotte Middle Punta Gorda Middle School $23,896,506 $2,968,607 12%
2008 Collier Middle C ress Palm Middle $26,535,164 $619,584 2%
2008 Collier Middle Marco Charter Middle $14450518 $98,219 1%
2008 Duval Middle I North Shore K-8 $25,222,118 $450,000 2%
2008 Fla ler Middle Bunnell K-8 $17776495 $1168123 7%
2008 Hillsborough Middle Smith Middle $20,160,152 $932,385 5%
2008 Lee Middle Oak Hammock Middle School $24,359,562 $885,000 4%
2008 Marion Middle Liberty Middle $28,242,481 $3,687,549 13%
2008 Sarasota Middle Woodland Middle School $31 412 195 $6,909 752 22%
2008 St.Lucie Middle Alla attah Flats K-8 $34,488,744 $3,351,476 10%
2008 St.Lucie Middle Palm Pointe Educational Research School at Tradition $24,836,235 $4,993,386 20%
2009 Okaloosa Elem Riverside Elementary School $11,716,323 $2,148,260 18%
2009 Bay Elem Deer Point Elementary $16,646,867 $1,711,350 10%
2009 Broward Elem Discovery Elementar K-6 $24,813,884 $3,397 0%
2009 Charlotte Elem East Elementary $14128364 $1389,286 10%
2009 Collier Elem Eden Park Elementary K-6 $19,625,793 $2,083,000 11%
2009 Collier El em Mi ke Davi s El ementar $18,747,0611 $1722,320 9%
2009 Duval El em Bartram Springs Elementar $16,349,939 $1,427,211 9%
2009 Hillsborough Elem Bailey Elementary $7,308,787 $753,646 10%
2009 Hillsborough Elem Stowers Elementary $10,360,379 $941,642 9%
2009 Lee Elem Heights Elementary School $20794081 $220,848 1%
2009 Lee Elem Lehigh Elementary School $15,702,253 $679,758 4%
2009 Manatee Elem G.D.Rogers Garden Elementary $12,223,480 $969,092 8%
2009 Martin Elem Citrus Grove Elementary $21,130,3251 $722,012 3%
2009 Orange Elem Keene's Crossing Elementary School $12,452,304 $1,487,617 12%
2009 Osceola Elem IKOA Elementary School ElemL $12,610,702 $1,874,555 15%
2009 Osceola Elem I Narcoossee Elementary ESM $14770196 $631727 4%
2009 Palm Beach El em C.O.Ta for/Ki rkl a ne El ementar $35,663,420 $3,628,916 10%
2009 Palm Beach Elem Hope-Centennial Elementary $25030950 $2,733790 11%
2009 Sarasota Elem Atwater Elementary School $12,524,430 $4,737,875 38%
2009 Volusia El em Champion Elementary $14,696,164 $1,615,729 11%
2009 Wakulla Elem Riversink Elementary $15,363,460 $1,300,000 8%
2009 Washington Elem Vernon Elementary School $6259105 $450421 7%
2009 Brevard High Satellite High School $4,736,903 $307,888 6%
2009 Brevard Hi h Herita a Hi h School $57,088,946 $628 370 1%
2D09 Hillsborou h High Steinbrenner High School $38,437,165 $4,391015 11%
2009 Hillsborou h Hi h Strawberr Crest Hi h School $43,204,430 $3,443,506 8%
2009 Oran a High East River High School $58,970,2821 $10,333,793 18%
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-8 Impact Fee Update Study
Z.73
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table G-5(continued)
Site Development Cost Analysis
Indian River County and Other Florida Jurisdictions
Ratio of Site i
Year District Type Facility Name Construction Cost Site Improv/Devel Development
Construction Cost
2009 Orange High Lake Nona High School $60,857,702 $7,186,702 12%
2009 Sarasota Hi gh Suncoast Pol echnical High School $11,730,040 $1,463,101 12%
2009 Walton High Walton Senior High $35764000 $50000 01
2009 Okaloosa Middle Shoal River Middle School $12,779,256 $2,170,119 17%
2009 Duval Middle Westview K-8 $29119,287 $1,708817 6%
2009 Hernando Middle Explorer K-8 $41,212,410 $1,200,000 3%
$16,315,050 7 8%
2009 Hillsborough Middle Barrington Middle School $1,368,16
2009 Lake Middle East Ridge Middle School $27,281965 $599,565 2%
2009 Osceola Middle Westsi de K-8 School $23,051,370 $2,162,558 9%
2009 Sarasota Middle Woodland Middle School $31,412,195 $6,909,752 22%
2010 Broward Elem Norcrest Elementary $22 286,245 $37,949 0%
2010 Collier Elem Palmetto Elementary $20,224,743 $2,440,985 12%
2010 Lake Elem Sorrento Elemenatry $15,842,160 $48,712 0%
2010 Orange Elem Old Chene North Forsyth Elementary $12,096,899 $1,815172 15%
2010 Osceola Elem East Lake Elementary $11,747,305 $1,255,467 11%
2010 Palm Beach Elem Everglades Elementary $15,940,134 $2,286,725 14%
2010 Palm Beach Elem Northboro Elementary $24,168,146 $1,482,606 6%
2010 Palm Beach El em Plumosa Elementary $21,038,789 $1,967,540 9%
2010 Clay Hi h Oakleaf Hi h $50,819,745 $274,000 1%
2010 Duval High Atlantic Coast High $50,466294 $7648460 15%
2010 Sarasota High Riverview High $78,561,000 $14,665,000 19%
2010 Collier High Lorenzo Walker Institute ofTechnology High $9,843,413 $287,278 3%
2010 Orange High Apopka HS Replacement $70,267,621 $9,439,283 13%
2010 Palm Beach High Palm Beach Gardens Community High $75,097,581 $10,693,532 14%
2010 Palm Beach Hi h Suncoast Hi h $59,972,270 $9,785,603 16%
2010 Volusia High University High $72,990,143 $12,232,947 1751
2011 Charlotte Elem Imeadow Park Elementary $12696116 $1,802689 14%
2011 DuvalElem Waterl eaf Elementar $14,882,021 $1,361,500 9%
2011 Escambia El em Global LearningAcademy $17,019,155 $200,000 1%
2011 Osceola Elem Hi hlands Elementary $14,534,309 $1,293,639 9%
2011 Pasco Elem Connerton Elementary"R" $11,598,590 $2,313,586 20%
2011 Calhoun High Blountstown High $19,407,910 $1,362,604 7%
2011 Charlotte High Charlotte High $61755842 $7904370 13%
2011 Browa rd High Lanier James Education Center $8,889,147 $918,943 10%
2011 Okeechobee High Okeechobee Achievement Academy $5,499,975 $1,300 0%
2011 Walton Middle Emerald Coast Middle $15918884 i $1717116
11%
Total/Weighted Average $2,779,762,814 $273,373,775 10%
Total/Weighted Average IRC Schools ONLY $51349776 $8101432 16%
.Total/Weighted Average(ExcludingIRC Schools $2,728,413,038 $265,272,343 10%
Source:IRC School District for IRC schools;Florida Department of Education for all other jurisdictions
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-9 Impact Fee Update Study 4
.Z,7
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Land Value Analysis
To estimate the current land value the following analysis is conducted:
• A review of current market value of land from the Property Appraiser database
where the existing schools are located;
• An analysis of vacant land sales in Indian River County over the past three years for
parcels of necessary size; and
• An analysis of market value of all vacant land from the Property Appraiser database
for parcels of necessary size.
The current value of existing school sites and vacant land value of parcels with similar sizes
ranged from $10,000 per acre to $32,000 per acre. Vacant land sales of parcels with similar
size over the past three years indicated a range of $18,000 per acre to $130,000 per acre.
This data is summarized in Table G-6. Based on this information, an average value of
$50,000 per acre is used in the impact fee calculations.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-10 Impact Fee Update Study
27�
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table G-6
Land Value Analysis
Variable Year Average Land
Value per Acre
Value of Current Parcels:
Elementary 2013 $28,697
Middle 2013 $10,745
High 2013 $17,639
-All Traditional Schools 2013 $20,171
Value of Vacant Land:
West IRC-Residential
15 to 25 acres 2013 $21,353
20 to 60 acres 2013 $18,612
60 to 100 acres 2013 $19,445
40 to 130 acres 2013 $19,851
West IRC-All Land Uses
15 to 25 acres 2013 $22,622
20 to 60 acres 2013 $22,181
60 to 100 acres 2013 $19,445
40 to 130 acres 2013 $19,851
Countywide-Residential
15 to 25 acres 2013 $26,160
20 to 60 acres 2013 $19,602
60 to 100 acres 2013 $19,193
40 to 130 acres 2013 $19,288
Countywide-All Land Uses
15 to 25 acres 2013 $31,644
20 to 60 acres 2013 $20,884
60 to 100 acres 2013 $19,193
40 to 130 acres 2013 $19,288
Vacant Land sales:
West IRC-Residential
15 to 25 acres 2010-2012 $95,109
20 to 60 acres 2010-2012 $74,877
60 to 100 acres 2010-2012 $17,704
40 to 130 acres 2010-2012 $47,197
West IRC-All Land Uses
15 to 25 acres 2010-2012 $97,836
20 to 60 acres 2010-2012 $74,877
60 to 100 acres 2010-2012 $17,704
40 to 130 acres 2010-2012 $47,197
Countywide-Residential
15 to 25 acres 2010-2012 $124,315
20 to 60 acres 2010-2012 $85,304
60 to 100 acres 2010-2012 $17,704
40 to 130 acres 2010-2012 $39,883
Countywide-All Land Uses
15 to 25 acres 2010-2012 $130,357
20 to 60 acres 2010-2012 $85,304
60 to 100 acres 2010-2012 $17,704
-40to130acres 2010-2012 $39,883
Used in the Study 2013 1 $50,000
Source:Indian River County Property Appraiser's Database
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 G-11 Impact Fee Update Study
276
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Appendix H
Administrative Fee
177
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Administrative Fee
The Florida Impact Fee Act, Florida Statute (F.S.) 163.31801, requires that administrative
charges for the collection of impact fees be limited to actual costs. Examples of typical
administrative costs include:
• Personnel expenses associated with the administration of the program (e.g., salary
and fringe of the impact fee coordinator and other staff responsible with the
administration of the program, etc.);
• Cost of the technical studies and other consulting fees;
• Attorney costs related to impact fee matters; and
• Other central cost allocation (a portion of the time spent by the County Manager,
various County Departments, etc.).
The administrative cost can be taken out of the revenues or can be added to the adopted
fee levels. At this time, Indian River County collects 2.5 percent of the impact fee in
addition to the impact fee amount. This amount increases to 3 percent within the cities,
with the County retaining 1 percent and each City retaining the remaining 2 percent.
The County tracks the administrative costs, which are presented in the following table for
the past five years. Between 2008 and 2012, the average annual expense associated with
the administration of the impact fee program was approximately $178,000. During the
same time period, the County collected an average of$1.1 million of impact fees per year.
This suggests that the administrative cost is approximately 15 percent of the collections. As
such, the 2.5-percent fee that the County is collecting represents a conservative approach
and will continue to be so until the impact fee revenues reach to approximately $7 million
per year.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 H-1 Impact Fee Update Study
�7Y
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
Table H-1
Administrative Expense
Expense 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Personnel $50,635 $76,088 $96,007 $88,567 $86,121 $397,417
General&Administrative $6,212 $7,456 $9,285 $9,083 $8,467 $40,503
Other Professional Services $29,466 $0 $2,100 $14,003 $101,610 $147,179
Interdepartmental Charges $54,597 $51,721 $56,357 $59,697 $74,689 $297,062
Supplies,Equipment&Other 722 2 015 1 4951 $7731 L813 1§,817
Total $141,6321 $137,2801 $165,2431 $172,1231 $272,6991 $888,977
Annual Impact Fee Collections $2,396,539 $596,3381 $618,8921 $759,7601 $1,102,6701 $5,474,199
%Administrative Expense 6%1 23% 27% 23% 25% 16%
Average Annual Administrative Expense $177,795
Average Annual Impact Fee Collections $1,094,840
%Administrative Expense 16%
Source: Indian River County
TOA conducted research to understand how other jurisdictions address this issue. The
following is a summary of the information obtained:
• Brevard County's impact fee ordinances indicate different administrative fee
percentages for each impact fee program area, which are used to limit the amount
taken out of the collected fees for administrative costs, and are not charged in
addition to the adopted fees. The ordinances include the following general
language: "The Board of County Commissioners shall be entitled to, but not more
than, X% of the funds collected pursuant to this division, to compensate for the
administrative expense of collecting and administrating this impact fee program. All
remaining funds collected from impact fees shall be used for the purpose of capital
improvements to, and expansion of, the county's infrastructure programs." The
allowed percentage is 2% in the case of solid waste impact fee, 5% in the case of
library impact fee, and 8% in the case of correctional facilities, fire rescue, EMS, and
roads impact fees.
In the case of educational facilities impact fee, the interlocal agreement between
the County and the School District reads, "The County is entitled to retain up to, but
not more than, 2.5% of the amount of educational facilities impact fees collected for
administration of the ordinance. In calculating the amount of administrative fee,the
County shall include those expenditures that are reasonably associated with the
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 H-2 Impact Fee Update Study
2,71
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
administration of the program. These expenditures may include but are not limited
to, compensation and benefits for personnel involved in the administration of the
ordinance; supplies and expenses related to administration of the ordinance; costs
associated with consulting services for establishment and periodic updates of the
ordinance; and those attorneys fees that may be necessary for administration and
enforcement of the ordinance. The County acknowledges that it administers other
impact fee programs not related to public educational facilities and pledges to
consolidate its administrative efforts in order to cost effectively administer all
impact fee programs. When shared administrative costs cannot be isolated by
specific impact fee program, the County shall prorate those costs based on amount
of revenue collected with each program."
• Collier County does not collect an additional percentage but uses a portion of impact
fee revenues to offset the related administrative costs. The County keeps track of
these costs and distributes them among impact fee accounts for different program
areas.
In the case of educationa facilities impact fee, Collier County's interlocal agreement
requires that the School District pays the County $6.25 per $1,000 of collections
(0.625 percent). This amount is not added to the impact fee, but rather, is taken out
of the gross collections.
• Osceola County's Impact Fee Ordinance the following language: "Actual
administrative costs for the county will be determined and will be adopted by
resolution and will be reviewed annually. The administrative fee will be determined
by comparing actual program expenditures to actual collections for the completed
fiscal year immediately preceding the calculation. Cost will be allocated to each type
of impact fee based on the best estimate by the impact fee coordinator of time
spent on each type. This fee will be in addition to the impact fee."
In addition, Osceola County's interlocal agreement states that "To reimburse the
County, Kissimmee, and St. Cloud for cost of collecting impact fees, each may charge
an administrative fee in addition to the Impact Fee, not to exceed the actual cost of
collection."
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 H-3 Impact Fee Update Study
LBO
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study
• Volusia County collects a 3-percent administrative fee in addition to the adopted
impact fee.
Given these findings and the State requirements, Indian River County's administrative fee of
2.5% is found to be a conservative amount and is consistent with practices of other
communities in Florida.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 H-4 Impact Fee Update Study
2�I
Appendix I
Master Fee Schedules:
Full Calculated Fee Rates
�g z
Correctional fa<ilitie Snlid Waste T—I.Ues Public Buildings Libraries Fm ergenry.erwee law Cnlnrcemen�
ITE LUC Lantl Use Uni[ 3009 sP--, 1009 Percen[ 1009 Percent 2009 P-- 2009 < s P,— ]009 Ve«em
Adpptetl pate NI,GIculated CM1anOe Atloptetl Pate Full Calculated Pe
Full Calculatetl Change Adoyfed Rate full Calculated Change —Pled Rate full Calculated [M1 nge Adnp—pate Full Calculated CM1 nt,e
Appendix J
Master Fee Schedules:
Affordable Growth Fee Rates
I$a
eprre�.�ooal Parddles
-- 6olie wash Facilltie• • • • Public Buildings• •• • Librmies [ ergenry Services L w[f—Ahem
ITE LUC Land Use Unit 2009 Affordable Percent 2009 Ai1.1—le C c nt 2009 Affordable. Percent 2009 Affordable Pra— 2009 m AHnrdable
ercent 1004 a Affordable Vercrnt
Adopted Rate G—U, Cbange Atloptetl Pate Gruwih Change Atlp�pted Ryat�e� GrowtM1 CM1ange Adopted Rite Growth CM1ange Adopted Rate Grnwth Change
Adnpled Rate Gruwlh [hanl;e L
TEIll
momam
.. �®" �� ����.,.L i��N�E�ifM1.c+1 ��� ����L'14.2P !WS•��y.��.L
Parks&Recreation • • r Transportation • ••Educational Facil-vies' AdIl-trative Fee(2.5%) To[aI(All Fees)
ITE LUC Land Use Unit Zoog Affordable Percent 2009 Affordable Percent 2009 Affordable Percent 2009 Affordable Percent 2009
Afford.th Percent
Adopted Rate Growth Change Adopted Rate Growth Change Adopted Rate Growth Change Atlopted Rate Growth Change Adopted Pate Growth Change
MEMO= MEMO=
q MEMO=
SEEN= MEMO= NINE=
MINI
NEI
NONE
MIMI
SEMI
®.,. • . !•��� !] tit®" ��� ® iid�
SEMI
MENEM
MENEM
Correelonal facilitiev • sore Waite fanlities Nblic-ldings pLroredes 2009 [me�genry Servirnz ampurtaYion
Land Use }009 Affordable Percent, 2009 Affordable Percent 2009 Affordable Percent 2009 ffordahle Percent Hprdable Percent 2009 Tr
Affordabb: Percent
ITE LUC Unit
pdppted Rate Growth Ch—, Adopted Rate Grpwt Change Atlopted Rale Grpwt Ch.— Atlopted 0.ate Growth ch.- Adopted Rate wIM1 Change pdopleEN iegg�wIF
Ch:�nge
� c
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table J-2(continued)
Master Fee Schedule-Affordable Growth Fee;City of Fellsmere,Town of Orchid,City of Sebastian,City of Vero Beach
Eel...I Facilities' City Adooin Fee 12.D%) C-ly�rl Fee[I.D%)) Total JAII Fees)
Land Us, unit NO Affordable Per- zo.9 off.rd.blia percent 2oog Affordable Percent zoof, Affordable P11-millill
ITE LUC Adopted Rate Growth Change ! Adopted Rate G-th Change Adopted Rate Gr.w1h Ch-gi, Adopted Rate G-th chargem
03N*NTVLL:
Sin Ie Famil detached
-Less than 1,000 sf du $1755 $1702 -3.1% $116 $122 5.2% $58 $61113.5%
$5,990 6 99 5.2%
210 -1000 to 1,499 sf du $1756 $1,702 -3.1% $116 5132 13.8% $58 566 55,990 6 14 13.]%
-1,500 to 2,499 sf du $1,756 $1702 -3.1% $149 $148 -0.7% $75 $74 $7675 $7618 -0.7%
-2,500 sf or l ar er on $1756 $1702 -3.1% $162 5166 2.5% $81 $83 $8,337 se 69 2.8%
220 Multi-4-it Access or Unit du $510 $668 33.7% $73 $BS 16.4% $37 $42 $3]]] 4 96 15.3%
240 Mobile Home/RV tied down du $623 $1026 64]% $55 $70 ].]% $32 $35 94% $3,343 3 1 7.]%
TRANSIENT ASSISTED GROUP: o/a
310 Hotel 566 523 -652% 533 531 -66.7% $3,412 $962 -658%
320 Motel n/a n/a $91 $1] -58.5% $20 $8 -60.0% $2086 863 -58.7%
620 Nursin Home rbed n/a n/a n/a $21 $9 -57.1% $11 $5 -54.5% $1088 $466 -57.2%
252 Ass i sted Care Uvin Facili ACLF bed n/a 525 $10 -60.0% 513 55 -61.5% $1,311 495 -62.2%
OFFICE&FINANEfi1L:
Medical Dffice Clinic 30,000 sf or less 1000 sf n/a $316 $92 -69.9% $153 $46 -69.9% $15746 4743 -69.9%
720 Medical Office Clinic realer than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf n/a n/a $306 $134 -56.2% $153 $67 -56.2% $15748 $6913 -56.1%
911 Bank/Savin s Walk-In 1000 sf o/a n/a $255 5306 -58.4% $128 $53 -58.6% $13,142 5 46 -58.6%
912 Bank Savin sDrive-In 1,000 sf o/a $296 $136 5148 $68 -54.1% $1522] 62
]IO General Office 1000 sf o/a $107 $43 -59.8% 53 $22 -58.5% $5,501 $2'z31 -59.4%
760 Research&Develo ment Center 1D005f n/a n/a o/a $73 $33 -54.8% $37 $16 -56.8% $3768 $1 85 -55.3%
INDURMAL•
140 Manufacturin 1,000 sf n/a $41$33 $16 -61.0% $21 $7 -61.9% $2134 812 -61.9%
150 Warehousln 1000 s£ n/a $33 $$5 -57.6% $$9 $7 -58.8% $5970 708 -58.9%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1000 sf $19 $5 -73.7% $9 2 -7].8% $970 239 -75.9%
152 Hi h-Cube Automated Warehouse 1000 sf n/a a n/a $33 $7 -788% $17 $3 -82.4% $1,723 340 -80.3%
110 General%ht Industrial 1,000 sf n/a $67 $26 -58.2% $33 $34 -57.6% $3,44] IS 20 -58.8%
Concrete Plant o/a n/a $143 62 -56.6% 72 $31 -56.9% ]370 3183 -56.8%
Same!Minln $22 $8 -63.6% 11 $4 -63.6% $1136 408 -64.1%
n a RETAIL:
820 Retail 1000 sf la n/a $115 $69 -40.0% $57 $35 -36.6% 55917 $3.5581 -39.9%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with orwo Car Wash fuel o n/a n/a 141 $55 -61.0% $70 528 -60.0% $7249 2 47 -60.7%
841 New Usetl Auto Sales 1000 sf $232 $82 -64.7% 116 $41 -64.7% $11972 $4.2221 -64.]%
932 Restaurant 1000 sf n/a n/a $570 $220 -61.4% $285 $110 -61.4% $29,349 11 12 -61.5%
934 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thr. 1000 sf n/a $832 $454 -05.4% 5416 $227 -45.9% $42838 23 62 -45.5%
850 Su ermarke[ 1D00 sf n/a $265 $92 -65.3% $133 $46 -65.4% $13667 4716 -65.5%
942 Automobile Reair Botl 5ho 1000 sf 163 $66 -59.5% $82 $33 -59.6% 8406 3 07 -59.5%
947 Self-Servi ce Car Wash ce ba n/a $324 $49 -84.9% $162 $24 -85.2% $16,699 $2A99 -85.0%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pum s s1CDC sf n/a n/a $587 $238 -59.5% 5293 $119 -59.4% $30213 $12.27S -59.4%
890 Furniture Store 1DOO sf n/a n/a 537 $13 -64.9% 19 $7 -63.2% $1,926 692 -64.1%
RECREA7pNAL:
430 Golf Course hole n/a n/a $266 5163 -38.]% $133 $82 -38.3% $13,668 S8.396 -38.7%
492 Rac ue[Club/Health Club/Dance5tudio 1,000 sf n/a $258 $132 -48.8% 5129 $66 -98.8% 513275 6 04 -48.7%
412 Coun Park n/a $19 S9 -52.6% 59 $4 -55.6% 5956 450 -52.9%
491 Tennis Court our[ n/a n/a 282 $153 -45.7% $141 $]6 -46.1% 14,523 7 74 -45.8%
420 Marina boat berth o/a n/a $23 $14 -39.1% $11 $7 -364% $1,1]8 722 -38.7%
GOVERNMENTAL:
732 Post
1000 sf n/a 5318 $151 -52.5% �M94
9 $75 -52.8% $16,383 7767 -52.5%
590 Ubrar1000 sf n/a $389 $243 -3].5% $122 -37.1% $20011 12516 -37.5%
733 Gover1,000 sf n/a n/a $202 597 -52.0% 1 -52.5% $%0,415 49875]1 tall $0 $260 $13 30.0% 53059 $1
35 26.]%
MISCE
565 Da C1000 sf n/a 203 $76 -62.6% $101 538 -62.4% $10429 3 18 -52.4%
610 Hos S1000 sf n/a n/a $134 $5] -5].5% $6] $28 -58.2% $6,877 $640 Veteri1000 sf $106 $152 434% $53
$76 43.4%560 Churc1000 sf o/a $61 $26 -57.4% 531 $13 -58.1% 53150 $2,3201 -58.1%
444 Movie Theater w/Matinee n/a n/a n/a $598 $1]2 -]1.2% $299 $86 -71.2% $30,]]8
520 Elemen[ar School Private,K-5 student n/a n/a $5 $4 -20.0% $3 $2 -33.3% $266 $185 -30.5%
522 Mitldle School Private 6-9 student $5 $S 00% $3 52 -33.3% $266 $250 -6.0%
530 HI h5chool Private,9.12 student $14 55 -64.3% $7 $3 -57.1% 5696 $265 -61.9%
540/550 Universi /l.nl or Col lee 7,500 or fewer s tudents student n/a n/a o/a $15 $9 -40.0% 58 55 -37.5% 5]96 $482 -39.4%
n/a Fire S[alion 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a $30 510 -66.7% $15 $5 -66.7% $1,530 $496 -67.6%
-For Educational Facilities Impact Fee,the Single Family(detached)rate should also be used for'Single Familv Attached/Townhouse"residential land use.
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc.
J-4 mpact Fee Update Study
June 2014
N
-a
W
Correctional fa[illties •Solitl—U,fr[ili[ie, • Ppbli•Buildings • • Libraries —Pprtalinn ercent ]009 Ed—U-1facllilies"--tU
ITE IUC lantl Use t 2009 AHordable —1— 1009 Affordable Per[ent 3009 AHortlahle perrent 2009 AHordable. Per[ent 2009 TAHnrdable
Affordable
n Adopted Rale Growth Ch-, Adoptetl Nate Growth Change Adopled R.I. Grow<M1 Change Pdopted Rate Growth -'.g. Adopted Rate Growth Change Adopletl
Rate Growth Change
®, •' ���� �'®� ®®�'' ��� �'" ASAI\®. ���
Indian River County Impact Fee update Study
Table J-3(continued)
Master Fee Schedule-Affordable Growth Fee;Town of Indian River Shores
City Ad,in Fee 12 om Cminty Admin.Fee(1.0%) Total(Ail F111)
M LUC Land Use Unit Z009 Affordable Percent 20.9 Affordable Per- 2009 Affordable Peroeal
Ad.ptnd Rate G-th Change Ad,pt,d Pat, G-th Change Adopted Rate G-th Ch-ge
RESFOEN71AL:
Single Fa mil detached
-Less than 1 000 If du $111 122 9.9% $56 $61 8.9% $5,736 6 69 9.3
210 -1000 to 1,499 If du $111 132 18.9% $56 $66 11.9% $5736 6761 18.2%
-1500 to 2,499 If du $143 $147 2.8% $72 $74 2.8% $],388 $7 82 2.6%
-2,500 If or larger tlu $156 $166 6.4% $78 $83 6.4% $8,027 8 31 6.3%
220 Multi-Famil/Ac-ri Unit du $70 $84 20.0% 535 $42 20.0% $3596 $4 35 20.6
240 Mobile H,,,/RV(tied down du 561 $69 13.1% $31 $35 12.9% $3,156 $3 78 13.4%
7RANSKNT ASSISTED GROUP:
310 1 room $63 $23 -63.5% $32 $11 -65.6% $3,248 $1166 -64.1%
320 Motel 537 $1] -54.1% $19 $8 -5]9% 53921 861 -55.2%
620 Nursin Home rbed 18 $9 -50.0% $9 SS -44.4% $911 466 -48.8%
252 Assisted Care Livin Facill ACLF ear $22 $10 -54.5% Sll 55 -54.5% $1134 495 -56.3%
OFFICE FINANCIAL:
720 Medical Office/Clinic 10000 sf or less 1,000 If 5300 $92 -69.3% 5150 $46 -693% $15440 $6743 -69.3%
Medical efflce Clinic realerth-10D001f 1,000 If $300 134 -55.3% $150 567 -55.3% $15440 6 13 -55.2%
911 Bank/Savin sWalk-In 1,000 If 5248 $106 -51.3% $124 $53 -57.3% 512790 SSA46 -57.4
912 Bank/Savin IDrive-In 1000 If $290 $136 -53.1% 5145 568 -53.1% $14,938 $6992 -53.2%
]10 General Off ce 1000 sf $102 543 -5].8% $51 522 $5,248 $2,231
]60 Research&Develo ment Center 1000 sf $]1 533 -53.5% 535 $16 -54.3% $3634 $1,685
-53.6%
RVOUSTHAL:
140 Manufatturin 1,000 If $40 $16 -60.0% $20 $B -60.0% $2044 812 -60.3%
150 Warehousin 1000 zf 32 14 -56.3% $16 $] -56.3% $1653 708 -5].2%
151 Mini-Warehouse l st 519 $5 -73.]% S9 S2 -]7.8% $9S] 239 -]50%
152 Hi h-Cube Automated Warehouse 1,000 sf $32 $7 -78.1% $16 $3 -81.3% $1,653 $340 -79.4%
110 GeneralUhtlntluslrial 10005! 65 $28 -56.9% $32 $14 -56.3% $3324 120 -57.3%
n/a ConcrMe Plant $138 $62 -55.1% 569 531 -55.1% $]097 $3 63 -55.2%
n/a Sand Minin $21 $B -61.9% $ll 54 -63.6% $1101 $408 -62.9%
RETAIL:
820 Retail 1000 sf la 5305 569 -34.3% j$402
535 -32.7% $5399 $3 58 -34.1%
944/946 Gasoline Servi ce StationwithorwoCar Wash fuel o $135 $55 -59.3% $28 -58.2% 56937 $2,847 -59.0%
841 New Used Auto Sal es 1000 sf $226 $82 -63.]% $41 -63.7% $11663 22 -63.8%
932 Restaurant 1000 st $544 $220 -59.6% $110 -59.6% $26021 $11 12 -596%
934 Fas[Food Rest w/Drivt`Thru 1000 If $804 $454 -03.5% $22] -43.5% $4140] 23 62 -43.6%
850 Su ermarket 1,000 sf $258 $92 -64.3% $46 -64.3% 513,299 4716 -64.5%
942 Automobile Re air Bod Sho 1000 sf $161 $66 -S9.D% $33 -59.3% $8296 3 7 -58.9947 Self-ServiceCar Wash ce ba 5318
$49 -84.6% $24 -84.9% S16358 2 99 -84.]%
853 Convenience Market with Gas Pum s 51,000 sf $5]2 $238 -58.4% $119 -58.4% 529,445 $12 75 -583890 FurnitureStore 1000 sf $36
$13 -63.9% $] -61.1% 51668 $692 -630%
RECREATIONAL:
430 Golf Course hole $257 $163 -36.6% 5129 $82 -369% 513246 8 % -36.6%
492 ftac uet Club/Hea lth Club/Dance Studio 100051 $249 $132 -0].0% $125 $66 -0].2% 12845 6 04 -07.0%
412 CourPark 516 59 -50.0% $9 54 -55.6% $928 450 -51.5%
491 Tenn is Court our[ $2]4 $153 -44.2% $13] $76 $14103 7 T4 -44.2%
420 Marina boatberth $22 14 -36.4% $11 $] -36.4% $1150 722 -37.2%
GOVEFFIMENTAL•
732 Post Office TODD If 5312 $151 -51.6% $156 $75 -51.9% $16062 ]767 -51.6%
590 Libra 1000 zf 5383 $243 -36.6% $197 $122 -36.1% 519]00 12 16 -36.5%
]33 Government Dffice Com lex 1,000 sf 519] $9] -50.8% 599 $48 -51.5% $10,170 $6 87 -51.0%
571 had bed $17 $26 52.9% $9 513 444% $897 $1,335 48.8%
MISCELLANEOUS:
565
NYC re Center 1,000 If 5199 $76 -61.6% 599 $38 -61.6% 510246 3 18 -61.8%
610 Hos i[al 100051 5128 $57 -55.5% $64 528 -56.3% $6593 2 25 -556%
640 VMerinar Clinic 1000 sf $101 152 50.5% 550 S]6 52.0% $5181 $7,224 S1.0%
560 Church 1000 sf $59 $26 -55.9% $3D $13 -56.]% $3053 1 20 -56.8%
444 Movie Theaterw Matinee 5568 172 -69.7% 264 $86 -69.7% $29243 8 47
520 Elements School Private K-5 student 5 $4 -20.D% $2 $2 0.0% $248 185 -25.4%
522 Middle5choo1 Private 6-9 student 55 55 C.0% $2 $2 0.0% $248 $250 0.8%
530 Hi h School Private 9-12 student $13 $5 -61.5% $] $3 -5].1% $6]4 $265
540550 Univers) Junior Coll e]500 or fewer students sWdent $15 $9 AO.D% $8 $5 -3].5% $7]8 $482 -380%
n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf $30 $10 -66.]% $15 SS -66.7% $1,530 $696 -6].6%
'For Educational Facilities Impact Fee,the Single Family(detached)rate should also be used for"Single Family Attached/Townhouse'residential land use.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 J-6 Impact Fee Update Study
"C0
'1
Appendix K
Master Fee Schedules:
Staff Recommended Fee Rates
2.1 4
Corretlional Facilluet Solitl Wasle rarilitles • • • • Ppellc Buildings •• • • Lm,a,iea Cmergenry Se,vioes law Enlnrcemem ve tent
ITE LUC Lantl Use Unil 1009 Staff Percent 2009 staff percant 2D09 Stag e«ent 20D9 Sta11 Pe«eni 2009 Stafl e«ent
2009 Stafi
AdppU,d Rate Cha, —ptetl Pate Change Atlupted Rate [hanRe Adopted Rale Change Adpptetl Rate Change Adnpletl Rate Ch:�nge
tt
ow
momm
MOM
�r�t}�
Parks&Recreation • Transportationr F • r Educational Facilities' Adm--inistrat-Fee(2.5%) Total(All FCes)
A
Ch
Adoptetl Ch
StaN 2009 2009 P
RE LUC Land Use Unit ercent Percent 2009 Percent 2009 Percent 2009 Percent
taff 51aH Stalt Staff
Adopted Pate Change Adopted P!at��eS
EE y Change Adopted Rd[e ange 11— Ch.—, dopted Rate Change
12
PA
•'• • ublic Buldln• • • -• Libraries finerRenryServices TransPortatmn
Corrrctional facilities Solid Wasre FacilJies P 1099 erten[ 3009 Percene 3009 Percent
Unit 2��9 Percent 1009 Percent 2009 Staff Percent Stall Sufi
ITF LUC tlRate 5taff CFan6e Atlupletl Rate [Fan6e Adupted Rale Staff CFanRe AduPted Rate CM1ange AJPptetl Pate CM1anRe
Land Use Adopted Rate Stalf CF-, ,(( Atlople ria
®®�•yam'' !J'���( ®�� ��� ��� 11.41•u�®'..''
�w� ®®��L'1'6'Yv ��r�,(� ��i'1'R7m ��� �®' '!!S!� �lY.�•aitJfm
Indian River County)Impact Fee Update Study
Table K-2(continued)
Master Fee Schedule-Staff Recommended Fee;City of Fellsmere,Town of Orchid,City of Sebastian,City of Vero Beach
RE WC Llnd U,� unit 2Qd9 S'l ff Ch� �d.'Ind A.,, s'�ff Ch.— Ad-tt,d Alt, soff ch-g' Ad.pt,d A- Ch.,n,
RES'DENTiAL:
Sin Ie Famil tletached
-Less than l,DOo" tlu S1,J56 $1,]02 -3.1% $116 $109 -6.0% $58 $54 -6.9% $5990 $5,612 -6.3%
210 -1,000a l,D sf du $1]56 $1,]02 -3.1% $116 $118 1.7% $58 $59 1.]% $5990 $6 77 1.4%
00 t.ta24995f tlu $1,556 $1]02 -3.1% $149 $133 -10.7% $75 $66 -12.0% $7,67S 6833
-2500W or lar f du $1755 $1,702 -3.1% $162 $149 -8.0% $el $75 -74% $8337 $7,691
220 Multi-Famil/Accersor Unit du 5500 5668 33.7% $]3 576 4.1% $37 $38 2.7% $3,777 $3,111 3.6%
tied down du $623 $1,026 64.7% $65 $60 -7.7% $32 $301 6.3% $3,343 $3,09 -7.3%
240 Mobile Home/RV-
TRANSIENT.ASSISTED GROUP:
310 Hotel $66 $24 -63.6% $33 $12 -63.6% $3,412
320 Motel om n/a n/a n/a $41 $18 -56.1% $20 $9 -550% 52,086 $909 -56.4%
620 WWIN-iHome rbed a a n/a 521 $10 -524% $11 $5 -54.5% $1,086 $537 -5D.6%
252 Asslstetl Ca re Uvin Facili ACLF bed n/a n/a n/a $25 $11 -56.0% $13 $6 -53.8% $1,311 $567 -56.8%
OFFICE
Medical Off ce/Clinic 10000 sf or less 100Alt a a $306 $94 -69.3% $153 $4] -69.3% $15]46 833 -69.3%
72D Medical Office Cllnic reat------10,000 sf 1 000 sf n/a n/a $306 $137 -55.2% $153 568 -55.6% $15]48 7 44 -55.3%
911 Bank Savin sWalk-In 1000 sf n/a n/a $255 $109 -17.3% $126 $55 -5].0% 513,142 $5622 -57.2%
912 Bank/Savin sOriveln 1000 sf n/a n/a a $296 $139 -53.0% $148 $]0 -52.]% 515227 $7172
]30 Genial Office 1000 sf n/a n/a n/a $107 $45 -5].9% $53 522 -58.5% $5,501 $2,30 -58.0%
760 Research&Develo men!Center 1000 sf n/a n/a $73 $34 -53.4% $3] Sl] -54.1% $3,76 $1752
INDUSTRIAL: $41 $17 -58.5% $21 $B -61.9% $2,134
14D Ma nufacNrin 10005}
150 Warehousln 1000 sf n/a n/a n/a $33 $14 -57.6% 17 $] -58.8% $1723
151 Mlni-Warehouse 1000 sf $19 5 -73.7% $9 $2 -778% $970 244Li
152 Hi h-Cube Automated Warehouse $33 $7 -78.8% 517 $3 -826% $1,723 $351110 GeneralU h[Intlushial 1,000 sf a a $6]
$29 -56.7% $33 $14 -57.5% $3447 $3 74n/a ConcretePlant n/a 5143 $64 -55.2% $72 532 -55.6% $]370 3 OSSantl
MWpln/a n/a n/a $22 $8 -63.6% $4 -63.6% 51,136 $423
a RETAIL:
820 Retait 1,000 sf la n/a n/a n/a $115 $73 -36.5% $57 $36 -36.8% $5917 3744 -36.7%
944/946 Gasoline/Service Sta[io n with or w/o Car Wash fuel os. n/a n/a n/a
$141 $SB -58.9% $70 $29 -58.6% $7,249 $2,998 -586%
641 New/Used Auto Sales 1000 sf a a n/a $232 $84 -63.8% $116 $42 -638% $11952 $4,338 -63.8%
estaurant 1000 sf n/a n/a $550 $230 -59.6% $285
932 Re-rant
$115 -59.6% $29,349 11 96 -596%
932 FRes[.w Orive-Thru 1000 sf n/a a a $832 $467 13.9% $416 5234 -43.8% $42,838 $24,063 43.8%
850 Su ermarke[ 1,0005} n/a n/a $265 $95 -64.2% $133 $47 -64]% $13667 $4,877
942 Automobile Re air/Bod Sho 10005! n/a n/a n/a $163 $68 -56.3% $82 $34 -58.5% $8,406 $3,525
$ -84.6% $16,699 $26
9q7 Sell-Service Car Wash vice ba n/a a $324 $50 -84.6% $162 25
er
853 Convenience Market with bas Pums 510005! $585 524] -57.9% $293 $124 -5].]% 530213 12736
1,000 sf n/a $37 $14 -62.2% 19 $7 -63.2% $1926 71
890 Furniture5[ore
RECREATIONAL:
430 Golf Course hole n/a a $266 $165 -38.0% $133 $82 -38.3% $13688 $8 81 -38.0%
492 0.ac ve[Club Health Club Dante Studio 10005! n/a n/a 5258 $13] -46.9% $129 $68 -41.3% $13,2]5 $7 8 46.9%
412 Coun Park a n/a n/a $19 $9 -52.6% $9 $5 -444% $956 $466 -51.3%
491 Tennis Court Durr n/a n/a $282 $158 -44.0% $141 $79 -44.0% 514523 8324 -44.1%
420 Manna boatber[h n/a n/a n/a $23 $14 -39.1% $11 57 -36.4% $1,1]8 $737 -37.4%
GOVERNMENTAL: 318 $153 -51.9% $159 $J] -51.6% $16383 7 95 -51.8%
]32 Post ufflce 1000 sf
590 Ubrar 1000 sf a $389 $246 -36.8% $194 $123 -36.6% 520011 $12 55 -36.8%
733 Government Office Com lex 1,200 sf n/a $202 $102 -49.5% $101 $51 -49.5% $10415 $5 7S -494%
571 Jail b.d $20 $26 30.0% $10 $1054 $3337 26.9%
MISCELLANEOUS:
565 Da Care Center 1,000 sf n/a n/i, n/a $203 $JJ -62.1% $101 $39 -61.4% $10429 $3988 -61.8%
610 Hos ital 1000 s( n/a n/a n/a $134 $59 -56.0% $67 $29 -56,7% 568]5 $3 33
640 Veteri nar Clinic 1000 sf a n/a a 106 $156 47.2% $53 $7B 4].2% $5456 8 24 46.5%
560 ChurcM1 1000 sf n/a n/a n/a $61 26 -57.4% $31 13 -58.]% $3150 $1,36D
444 Movie Theater w/Matinee $598 161 -69.]% $299 $90 -69.9% 30778 $9,318 -69.7%
ementar School Private K-5 sturdent a n/a a $5 $4 -20.0%% $3 $2 -33.3% $266 $190 -28.6%
520 El
522 Mlddle School Private,6-9 student n/a n/a n/a $5 $5 0.0 $3 $2 -33.3% $266 $255
12 9
i h5chool Private, - sNtlen[ n/a n/a 514 $5 -64.3%
540/550 530 HUnivers) /lunior ,9-a 7500 or fewer students student a n/a a $15 510 -33.3%
n/a Fire Station
1,000 s( n/a n/a n/a
-For Educational Facilities Impact Fee,the Single Family(detached)rate h,.Id also be used for"Single Family Attached/Townhouse"residential land use.
Indian River County
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. K-4 Impact Fee Update Study
June 2014
W
• • • • • Pudlic Builtlingz• • • librarlez Transportation CtlurnUonal fariM1ties'
Correctional facilities Solltl Waste facilities e«ent Vercpn�
2009 Percent 2009 Percent 2009 2009
Unit 2009 Percent 2009 Vercent Stall Stalf Ado dRate Stall [M1onl;e AdnPted Rate Staff CM1anfe
ITE LUC Land Use Statl Stall Chan Atlopted flat¢ Change Atlopted Rate Change Pte
Adopted Rate Change Atloptetl Hate Be
Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study
Table K-3(continued)
Master Fee Schedule-Staff Recommended Fee;Town of Indian River Shores
City Admin Fee(2 0%) C.-I Ad,r,m.Fee(1.0%) TItal JAH Fees)
RESWENT14
Sin Ie Famil detached
-less than 1000 s/ du $111 5103 -7.2% $56=16
$5736 $5 30 -7.1%
210 -1,000 to 1,9995£ du $111 $112 0.9% $56 $5,736 $5772 0.6%
-1500 it,2,499 sf tlu 143 $126 -11.9% $72 $7388 6 09 -11.9%2,500 sf or later du 156 $142 -9.0% $78 . $8,02]
7 32 -8.7%
22D Multi-Famd Accesso Unit du 70 722.9% $35 $3596 3727 3.7%
240 Mobile Home RV tied down tlu 561 556 -. $31 $3,156 2 95 -8.3%
rRANSR:NT,ASSISTED GROIN:
310 Hotel $63 $21 -66.7% $32 511 -65.6% WM
$1 3 -66.7%
320 Motel $37 $15 -59.5% 19 $8 -57.9% $784 -59.2%
620 Nursln Home rbetl $18 $7 -61.1% $9 $3 -66.7% 397 -61.9%
252 Assisted Care Livin FacilityACLF bed $22 $7 -68.2% $11 $4 -63.6% $376 -66.8%
OFFICE&FINANCMIL:
720 Medical Office Clinic 10000 sf or less 1,000 sf $300 $89 -70.3% $150 $45 -70.0% $4 97 -70.2%
Medi Cal Office Cflnic tearer than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf 300 130 -56.7% $150 $65 -56.7% 6700 -56.6%911 Bank Savin sWalk-In 1000s $248
$100 -59.7% $124 $50 -59.7% $5159 -59.7%912 Ba n k SavinsDrive-In 1000 sf 290 $130 -55.2% $145 $65 -55.2% 6 99 -55.2%710
General Office 1,000 zf $102 $41 -598% 551 $2D -60.6% $2102 -59.9%
760 Research&Develo ment Center 1000 sf 571 531 -56.3% $35 $15 -57.1% $3,634 1576 -56.6%
INDUSTR AL•
190 M- acturin 1,000 sf ;$5544
$15 -62.5% $20 $7 -65.0% $2049 748 -63.4°%
150 Warehousin 1000 sf13 -59.4% $16 $7 -56.3% $1653 672 -59.3%
151 Mini-Warehouse 1000 sfSS -]3.7% $9 $2 -77.8% $957 232
152 HI h-Cube Automated Warehouse 1000 sf $6 -81.3% $16 $3 -81.3% $1,653 322 -80.5%
110 General li ht Industrial 1,000 sf $26 -600% $32 513 -59.4% $3324 $1,323211 -60.0%
n/a Concrete Plant $58 -58.0% $69 $29 -58.0% $7097 $2984 -58.0%
n/a Sand Min— $7 -66.7% $11 $4 -63.6% $1,101 $382 -65.3%
REFAR: acre
820 Retail 1000 sfel a $63 -40.0% 552 $32 -38.5% $5399 3 53 -39.7%
944/946 Gasoline/Service1t11 nwith orw,Car Wash fuel oEMI
.2% $67 525 -62.]% $6937 S2.602
-6L5%
841 New/Used Au to Sales 1,000 sf .5% $113 $39 -65.5% 511663 $4 33 -65.4%
932 Resnurant 1000 sf .7% $272 $101 -62.9% $28021 10 40 -62.7%
934 Fast Food Rest.w Drive-Thru lODO0 .4% $402 $216 -96.3% 541,407 $22,217 46.3%
850 Su ermarket 1000 sf 258 .7% $129 $93 -66.]% $13299 4 sl -66.5%
942 Automobi leRe alt/Botl Sho 1,000 sf $161 .5% $81 $31 -61.7% $8,296 $3 14 -61.3%
947 Self-Service CarWash ice ba $318 5.5% $159 $23 -85.5% 516356 $2 87 -85.4%
853 Convenience Market wi th Gas Pum s s 1000 sf $572 .6% $266 $112 -60.6% $29,445 11 27 -60.9%
690 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 536 3.9% $18 $6 -66.7% $1868 $663 -64.5%
RECREATIONAL:
430 Goff Course hole 5257 $160 -37.7% M
-38.0% 513246 8257 -37.7%
492 R-uet Club Health Club Dance Studio 1000 sf $249 124 -50.2% -50.4% $12845 6 07
412 Coun Park $16 $8 -55.6% -55.6% $928 $424 -54.3%
991 Tennis Court court $274 $145 -4].1% -46.]% $14103 $7469 -4].D%
420 Marina boat berth $22 $14 -36.4% -36.4% $1,150 $69-1 -39.2%
GOVERNMENTAL:
732 Post Of0 ce 1,000 sf 312 14] -52.9% $156 $73 -53.2% 16062 7559 -52.9%
590 fibra 1000 s/ 383 239 -37.6% 191 $119 -37.7% $19700 12290 -37.6%
733 Government Office Com lex 1,000 sf $197 $97 -50.8% $99 $48 -51.5% $10170 4987 -51.0%
571 Tall bed 537 522 29.4% $9 $11 22.2% 5897 $1 56 28.9%
MISCELLANEOUS:
565 1 Dav Ca re Center 1,000 sf 5199 $74 -62.8% $99 $37 -62.6% 510,246 53ANI -62.9%
610 Hos ital lODO s( 128 $53 -58.6% $64 $27 -S].8% $6593 2749 -58.3%
640 Vetenna Clinic 1000 sf $101 $146 44.6% $50 573 46.0% $5,181 $7,498 44.7%
560 Church 1,000 sf $59 $24 -59.3% $30 $12 -60.0% $3,053 $1,25 -58.9%
444 Movie Theaterw Matinee $568 $157 -72,4% $284 $76 -72.5% $29243 $8,078 -72.4%
520 Elemen[ar School Priva to K-5 student $5 $3 -40.0% $2 $2 00% $246 177 -28.6%
522 Middle School Pri,. ,2N student $5 $5 D.0% 52 $2 0.0% $298 201 -2.8%
530 Hi h School Private 9-12 student $13 $5 -61.5% $] $2 -71.9% $674 250 -62.3%
540550 1ni ersi Junior Coll a 7,500 or fewer students student $ly $9 -40.0% $8 $5 -37.5% $778 $470 -39.6%
n/a Fire station 1000'f
530 -r--- .3% $15 $4 -73.3% 51,530 S41s -R.9%
-For Educational Facilities Impact Fee,the Single Family(detached)rate should also be used for"Single Family Attached/Townhouse"residential land use.
Tindale-Oliver&Associates,Inc. Indian River County
June 2014 K-6 Impact Fee Update Study