Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-175 WORK ORDER NUMBER 2 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SEPTIC TO SEWER CONVERSION EVALUATION This Work Order Number 2 is entered into as of this 18 day of Octobe:r201� pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services, dated this 15" day of November 15, 2011, and that certain Extension and Amendment of.Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 4"'day of November, 2014(collectively referred to as the"Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Schulke, Bittle and Stoddard, LLC("Consultant"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit 1 (Scope of Work), attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit 2 (Fee Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit 3 (Time Schedule), attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. '�oniM�ss�••. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONEE.*y•'' �'✓F9s:.` Schulke, Bittie and Stoddard, LLC OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ;c,.• :*: e*: S By: f f By: oe..•' �j Joseph W. Schulke, P.E. Bob Solari, Chairman .'�y••. : '.- Managing Member BCC Approved Date: October 18, 2016 Attest:Jeffrey R. Smith, k of Court n omptroller By: D pu Clerk Approved: Jason E. Bro n, County Administrator 0 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Dy an T. Reingold, County Attorney .y��. _ o INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY Api€. SERVICES SE'(JtIC +� � : Y:c! LUf1V�"SiOr (_�, 1 L;,a%ic $5:w :�j Exhibit 1 Scope of Work Work Order # 2 IRCDUS Septic to Sewer Conversion Evaluation I. BACKGROUND: On March 8, 2016 the Board of County Commissioners(BCC) authorize staff to further refine the ranking matrix based on additional criteria, prepare cost estimates for the ranked areas and a TN/TP removal cost. On November, 2013 the BCC approved two (2) sewer feasibility studies. The two studies targeted different geographical areas in the unincorporated Indian River County. The study labeled "Summerplace" is located on the north side of SR-510 between the Atlantic Ocean and Indian River Lagoon. The second area studied was labeled "North Sebastian Area" generally described as having a western limit of US Highway 1, an eastern limit of the Indian River Lagoon, a Northern Limit of Indian River Drive connection to US Highway 1, and the Southern Limit as Main Street. During the same time many researchers were also studying the effects of Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems (OSTDS) nutrient loadings causing algae blooms in the Indian River Lagoon. The capital cost of converting septic to centralized sewer is an expensive undertaking as shown in the two feasibility studies. Therefore, Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) staff decided to evaluate a ranking mechanism based on several criteria. The primary goal of the two feasibility studies were conducted to address the health of the Indian River Lagoon (IRL). The North Sebastian study in addition to the health of the IRL also focused to maximize economic development and job creation along the US Hwy 1 corridor in Sebastian. The goal of the evaluation is to prioritize the areas based upon various physical and environmental factors and determine the feasibility of incorporating the proposed systems into the 10 year Capital Improvements Plan. The responsibility of an un-biased ranking system utilizing the physical and environmental factors as justification will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT. Upon completion of the prioritization and ranking of the areas, CONSULTANT will evaluate the installation of sanitary sewer collection system and provide an estimated cost for the installation of the recommended improvements to the nearest existing sewer. As the individual areas are evaluated,CONSULTANT will calculate the wastewater flow rate for these areas. The CONSULTANT will then prepare a report summarizing the findings of the study. The results of the prioritization and rankings will be presented in a tabular format along with the preliminarycost estimates for each of the top 30 ranked areas. f 1- II. SCOPE OF SERVICES: Phase I: Evaluation and Rankine 1. Initial Ranking (Aquatic Health) CONSULTANT will review the existing analyses the COUNTY has performed, analyze existing historical utility records, existing as-built's, utilize the Indian River County Utilities Geographic Information Systems' (GIS) data, and utilize other maps, records, reports and documents pertinent to this study. The CONSULTANT will use this data and develop a rational numerical indexing system of physical and environmental factors that influence the potential discharge of nutrients from existing OSTDS and its migration through sub-surface and surface waters to the Indian River Lagoon and its tributaries.The CONSULTANT will derive a mathematical formula and develop spread sheets which enable a numerical analysis of these factors that will result in the ranking and prioritization of the conversion of approximately 345+- geographic areas in IRC that currently utilizing onsite sewage treatment and disposal system to centralized collection and treatment sewer utility system. It is anticipated that the numerical prioritization will be based upon at least the following physical and environmental factors for determining the initial ranking and prioritization: • Population Density for Loading Concentrations • Proximity to Surface Waters • Location of the Community in Relation to the 100-year Flood Plain— FEMA Flood Plain • Depth of the Ground Water Table • Soil Conditions of the Drain Field —Soil Type • Age of the Surface Water Management System • Age of the Existing OSTDS The soil type and water table will be determined by referencing published geotechnical data obtained from the USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service Soil Survey and other available information, and existing survey or GIS data that may be provided by IRC. No new survey or Geotechnical field work will be obtained. COUNTY staff has already prepared an initial/ preliminary evaluation and researched some of the parameters mentioned-above. This information will be made available to the CONSULTANT in order to keep man-hour cost down. However, it will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to verify the accuracy of the provided data/information. As part of the evaluation the study area will be restricted to the Indian River County Utilities Service area within the Urban Service Area (USA). Furthermore, the evaluation will be limited to areas with clusters of existing OSTDS and not large individual parcels with existing OSTDS. The top 30 areas identified in this initial ranking (areas of highest priority to convert) will be included in further evaluations as outlined below. 2. Sanitary Sewer System Evaluation and Cost Estimate CONSULTANT will review various types of sanitary sewer collection and transmission systems, including gravity sanitary main sewer collection system with conventional lift station, vacuum sewer collection system with vacuum pits and pump station, and low pressure force main with individual grinder stations for each of the 30 2 areas and provide an estimated construction cost. The cost per unit (existing home site / or buildable lot) will be determined for each geographic area. 3. Final Ranking The CONSULTANT will derive a mathematical formula and develop a spread sheet which enables a numerical analysis of the following data to arrive ata Final Ranking and Prioritization of the conversion of the 30 geographic areas: 1. Aquatic health (results of the Initial Ranking) 2. Sewer System Evaluation and Cost data 3. Estimate the Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus removed /Cost per Ib. removed 4. Public health -Availability of a Public Potable Water Utility System Phase II: Master Wastewater System data CONSULTANT will provide estimated average and peak flows generated by each of the 30 priority areas to the COUNTY (based on 10 state standards). This information will be provided for COUNTY's inclusion in its development of its Master Wastewater System. Phase III—Report Preparation CONSULTANT will summarize the findings of the Analysis/Prioritization, Individual Area Sanitary Sewer System Evaluation, and the Master Wastewater System Evaluation in a report.The report will include a summary of the approach used to determine the priority areas to be converted from onsite septic system to sanitary sewer. A table of the priority rankings for the areas of the study and the estimated construction costs for each of the areas will be provided as an appendix to the Report. CONSULTANT will evaluate the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) removed from the conversion of septic to sewer for each of the 30 priority areas and compute a cost per pound for TN/TP removal. CONSULTANT is to compare these cost per pound removed to other projects such as the existing Algal Turf Scrubber (Osprey Marsh, Egret Marsh) projects, Spoonbill Marsh, PC main projects and any other innovative TN/TP removal projects. The COUNTY will provide the CONSULTANT with TN/TP removal numbers for the projects installed and operated by the COUNTY. f 3 III. ASSUMPTIONS: 1. All meetings will be held in Indian River County. 2. Project schedule is based on a four(4)week review of the draft submittal, by the County. IV. DELIVERIES: Schulke,Bittle&Stoddard,LLC(SBS)will submit five(5)copies of the draft report for review by the County. Twelve (12)copies of the final report and all applicable computer/electronic files will be submitted to the County. V. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY COUNTY: To support SBS's efforts in this project, the County agrees to provide the following services: • Furnish files, drawings, previous reports, records of construction, underground utility locations, operation and maintenance data, topographic information, permits, pertinent correspondence, and any other information necessary to prepare the work described herein. • Provide timely advice and guidance regarding County policies and technical preferences. Provide timely comments and review of information provided. The County Agrees to assist in completing this project in accordance with the proposed schedule. • Provide suitable digital files of available site plans, topography, and record drawings for the IRCDUS service area; provide suitable digital files with information and data requested by SBS, converted by County from County's ArcGIS files as needed for the project. • Resolve all internal variance in opinion regarding technical preferences or guidance prior to directing SBS. • Provide all labor, equipment, materials, etc. needed to complete the items to be self-performed by IRC staff. 4 Exhibit 2 Fee Schedule Work Order# 2 IRCDUS Septic to Sewer Conversion Evaluation Method and Amount of Compensation Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, L.L.C., proposes to provide the Scope of Work as outlined in Exhibit 1 based on the following lump sum fees: For a lump sum fee, including all materials and labor: $86,300.00 r 5 Exhibit 3 Time Schedule Work Order # 2 IRCDUS Septic to Sewer Conversion Evaluation Time of Performance The estimated time frame for completion of services from the approval of this Work Authorization is a follows: I. Schedule SBS anticipates completion and submittal of the draft report within one hundred and five (105) days after notice to proceed. Upon review and comments by the County,the final report will be submitted within three (3)weeks. Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank f 6