The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/11/2014 (2)BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA IMPACT FEE UPDATE WORKSHOP AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 11, 2014 - 1:30 P.M. County Commission Chamber Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Wesley S. Davis, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Bob Solari Tim Zorc District 4 District 1 District 2 District 5 District 3 Joseph A. Baird, County Administrator Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk to the Board 1. CALL TO ORDER 1:30 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman 3. PRESENTATIONS A. Staff Overview of Impact Fee Update B. Consultant Presentation on Residential Fees (Including School Impact Fees) and Implementation Issues 4. QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION A. Board of County Commissioners B. Members of the Public 5. WRAP-UP June 11, 2014 — Impact Fee Update Workshop Page 1 of 2 6. ADJOURNMENT Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircgov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meeting may be broadcast live by Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. June 11, 2014 — Impact Fee Update Workshop Page 2 of 2 W1 Planning and Engineering Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 6, 2014 Mr. Phil Matson Indian River County MPO Staff Director 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 Re: Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Dear Mr. Matson: Tampa Office - Headquarters 1000 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 1 (813) 224-8862 Enclosed is the Final Technical Report of the Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study. In addition to the data and analysis provided in our April 14, 2014 report, this report includes the following: • Finalized residential fee schedules. The final fee schedules for residential land uses includes one more tier for the single family detached residential land use to reflect relatively lower impact of smaller homes. • Educational facilities impact fee analysis is finalized and included in Section X of the report. • Hi -Cube (Automated) Warehouse land use is added to the fee schedule to reflect lower impact of this land use compared to traditional warehouses. • Several implementation issues are addressed on pages 6 through 10 of this report. • Calculations for administrative fee are included in Appendix H. The following table provides a comparison of staff recommended levels of updated residential fees to the current adopted fees for all program areas combined. As presented, the fee decreases for almost all of the land uses with the exception of a slight increase for the single family land use with 1,000 to 1,499 square feet and multi -family land use. These minor increases are due to updates to the demand component and introducing a new tiered -category in the case of single family homes. Tampa • Orlando • Bartow • Ft. Lauderdale • Baltimore • www.tindaleoliver.com a 3 Mr. Phil Matson Page 2 of 2 ITE LUC Total (All Fees)* Land Use Unit 2009 Full Percent Adopted Calculated Change Rate F I;!*11.11,�IIwRa 210 Sin:leFamil detached - Less than 1,000 sf du $7,519 $7,175 -4.6% - 1,000 to 1,499 sf du $7,519 $7,763 3.2% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du $9,388 $8,623 -8.2% - 2,500 sf or lar:er du $10,195 $9,681 -5.0% 220 Multi -Fa mil /Accessor Unit du $4,816 $4,936 2.5% 240 Mobile Home/RV tied down du $4 455 $4,101 -7.9% * Includes administrative fee Source: Appendix K, Table K-1 If you have any questions or comments concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me or Nilgun Kamp. It has been our pleasure to have worked with the County and School District staff on this important project. Sincerely, Steven A. Tindale, P.E., AICP President Tampa • Orlando • Bartow • Ft. Lauderdale • Baltimore • www.tindaleoliver.com 3 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study FINAL REPORT Executive Summary Prepared for: Indian River County Community Development Dept. — Planning Division 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 ph (772) 226-1237 June 6, 2014 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 ph (813) 224-8862, fax (813) 226-2106 Executive Summary In response to high growth levels and the need to provide infrastructure to support this growth, Indian River County (IRC) implemented a Transportation Impact Fee in 1986. In 2005, the County adopted impact fees in eight additional program areas. The technical studies for all program areas were updated in 2007; however, these technical studies were not adopted. Of the nine program areas, only the transportation impact fee was later updated substantially in 2009 by an internally generated County update using data from the 2005 and 2007 studies, resulting in a fee reduction for almost all the land uses. The eight non -transportation program fees were slightly modified in the 2009 update. Since then, the County suspended the collection of five impact fee areas to promote construction during the economic downturn, and more recently extended suspension of correctional facilities, solid waste, and public buildings impact fees. Indian River County has retained Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) to prepare an update study to reflect changes to the impact fee variables for all program areas. In addition, the direction received from the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) is to maintain the residential land uses at the current level and develop a methodology to reduce non-residential impact fees. To address the goal of reducing fees for non-residential land uses, TOA developed the Affordable Growth methodology, which takes into consideration revenues received from the existing development that will be used toward capacity expansion projects. As population growth rates decrease, the existing development's ability to assist in absorbing new growth's impact while maintaining the level of service (LOS) becomes more possible. The Affordable Growth method calculates the necessary impact fee levels to maintain the existing/achieved LOS given a certain level of non -impact fee funding at an estimated growth rate. It is important to note that whether to fund capacity expansion projects solely with impact fee collections or supplement them with alternative funding sources is largely a policy decision, allowing the County to contribute or limit non -impact fee funding in its service areas as appropriate based on its capital improvement planning goals and the nature of its existing impact fee program. In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established through case law since the 1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the "dual rational nexus" test, which requires that they: Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 ES -1 Impact Fee Update Study • Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to the need created by new development paying the fee; and • Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development, typically accomplished through a list of capacity -adding projects included in the County's Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another planning document/Master Plan. In addition, one of the requirements of the 2006 Florida Impact Fee Act is that the studies be based on most recent and localized data. This technical report has been prepared to support legal compliance with existing case law and statutory requirements. The methodology used in this report is consistent with that used in the 2004 and 2005 technical reports, which are the basis of the current adopted fees. Although the Florida courts have yet to expressly address the methodology underpinning the Affordable Growth Strategy, this aspect of the report is based on the long- standing legal standards described in this report. The technical report also documents the methodology components for each of the impact fee areas, including an evaluation of the inventory, service area, level -of -service (LOS), cost, credit, and demand components. Information supporting this analysis was obtained from the County and other sources, as indicated. Three primary factors affected the County's impact fee levels: • Since 2005, the County built additional infrastructure and increased the capital asset inventory significantly in most program areas. This results in an increased asset value, which in turn, increases the impact fee. • In most infrastructure areas, the County used or is projected to use other revenue sources to supplement impact fees, such as optional sales tax revenues, ad valorem tax revenues, and other revenues. Depending on the program area and the level of on-going investment, these contributions result in an increase in the credit component for some program areas, which in turn reduces the impact fee. In others, if the investment was made in earlier years and are not projected to continue at the same levels, the credit may decrease compared to the previous study, which in turn increases the impact fee. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 ES -2 Impact Fee Update Study 7 • Finally, the cost and demand components are adjusted to reflect the most recent available data, which affects different land uses at different rates. Given that the updated fees under the Affordable Growth method indicated a decrease for almost all of the non-residential fee categories, which is consistent with the County's economic development goals, the BOCC adopted the updated fees for non-residential land uses on April 22, 2014. At that time, calculations for residential land uses were not yet finalized due to considerations for expanding the residential land use categories and to allow for some time to obtain the input of the School Board for the educational facilities impact fee. This technical report includes the final calculations for residential land uses. The following tables provide a summary of calculated fees for seven representative land uses. These land uses include examples of calculated residential land uses as well as adopted non-residential land uses. The complete schedule has almost 50 land uses and a comparison of all fee categories is included in Appendices I through K. The tables include the following: Table ES -1 (Unincorporated County) • Current adopted fee • Calculated maximum impact fee • Percent change from the current fee to the calculated fee • The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix I. Table ES -2 (Unincorporated County) • Current adopted fee • Affordable growth impact fee • Percent change from the current fee to the affordable growth fee • The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix J. Table ES -3 (Preferred Alternative, Unincorporated County) • Current adopted fee • Staff recommended impact fee • Percent change from the current fee to the staff recommended fee • The complete fee schedule associated with this scenario is included in Appendix K. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 ES -3 Impact Fee Update Study The methodology used to develop the full calculated fees and affordable growth fees is documented throughout this report. The staff scenarios shown in Table ES -3 as well as Appendix K represent the County's preferred alternative and follow the affordable growth calculations, with the exception of the following policy decisions primarily based on a review of capital needs in the near future: • Adoption of maximum calculated fees for emergency services • Application of a 50 -percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for public buildings impact fees for all land uses • Application of a 25 -percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for parks and recreation facilities impact fees for all land uses • Suspension of the library impact fees Of these, parks and recreation and libraries impact fees are charged only to residential land uses while the emergency services and public buildings impact fees are charged to both residential and non-residential land uses. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 ES -4 Impact Fee Update Study 9 Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table ES -1 Summary of Impact Fees — All Program Areas (Full Calculated Fee Rates); Unincorporated County Correctional Facilities 2009 ITE LUC Land Use Unit Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change Solid Waste Facilities 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change Public Buildings 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change Libraries 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change Emergency Services 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change ®' Sin; le Famil 2000 s WIWI !BIIIMMEEITIMI tE1111311 INIMEIIIIIMATIliiiiiiiiiiiM 11111=MIIIIMEM l'ErIMIEFEIMENE3 liIMEI111•1711W3 t3111iiITEI MIMEO 1111.115311 MEM 1! 7MI= WM IWM 11M1 1 MUM IIIIIIIIIIIIMNIIIIIIIIIIII EIMEMETIMMIEMIIIIMMEITINIMEMIIIIIIMINIIIMMEI 3113111=11111=3113 1111=7/1•111111ta1fl 1311 4i -100.0% MIMITIM i1 WECIII=1111!1! 1000 sf IIIMij13113I111131 111111=1121111111=1121-100.0% M3171=1EIIIIIMME1 MIMI Osfl INNIFEEI EMINI WEN1121202 1 000 5f ®NINIIIETI IMIEFETW1 -100.0% ii 1 12 1 7/1 1/31 21 MIIINETIIIIIIIIIMMIMM EFENICIZO 1000z;ta ®TIMINIIIIMI 111=173liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit'•1:3 -100.0% MIIINIIIMBEIMMIMDEIN ElliiiififMINEI IIM11113:53!110 MTIIMIMEIEMMIEITIMI WEE F451 Food Rest. w Drive-Thru 1000 sf I1E1IIIIIR MI ZIIIIIIIIIMINEI -100.0% IIWJEMMINNIi1IIM 11211111111111E111121 L. w Enforcement 2009 nE LUC Land Use Unit Full Percent Adopted Rnte Calculated Change Pa kis &Recreation 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change Transportation 2009 Full Percent Adopted Calculated Change Rate Eduotional Facilities 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change Adml istratIve Fee 2.5%) 2009 Full Percent Adopted pate Calcul ted Change Total (All Fees) 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rale Calculated Change ��m� m �-'.. t lw:tt� � m�m ®' Sin; le Famit 2000s ��i'� � �� 110111111111 111111111111111111111111111 IISTIIIIIIIEMIIIIIIITZI I��1�� MIZETIMMMIIIIMEM �� I1MMEITIIIIIIIME1 M I�1 11721,E1MIN1 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiilDEJI�21721 WEE1111112 1000 of 31r111111MEITIIMTIMI lMIINIMIERIMI ' 1000 sf �� 2i�Ei�Ei IEillm=ECITI iiiiiiiiiMEM WIIiifiii IIII Ell l IZEIIIIIIIMINEIM MIEUI IIIII iii . 1000sf ENIIIPfME>mMI !fl11111=1/1DE1 ®TEEIiiiiiiiiiiIECE2 E MMAJ =J11111E liiiiiiiii 111111•1121111 71 KIIMITII 1000sf:lo !j 172i•111111Mi121 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 1,0001( MEBEIMEIffn 100.4% ®®NIMill =REM 545,464 ((((((((((((((1/111MNICEI® MICITEIMIECEMM3 WITOMEIMEMMEM Source: Appendix I, Table 1-1 Notes: (1) "2009 Adopted Rate" column reflects all current adopted fee levels prior to April 22, 2014. Of these, fees for correctional facilities, solid waste and public buildings were suspended. (2) "Calculated" column reflects the maximum calculated fees. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County ES -5 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Table ES -2 Summary of Impact Fees — All Program Areas (Affordable Growth Fee Rates); Unincorporated County Correctional Facilities 2009 RE LUC land Use Unit Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Solid Waste Facilities 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rte Growth Change Public Buildings 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Libraries 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Emergency Services 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Growth Change Rate ®' Sin; le Famil 2000, 0IllMWZIMMIMEI -100.0% NIEM=311 -100.0% j=ffi MEM =3321=1301.1=3 a11=333 MEM ®IIII -100.0% ®MIDEEIEM3 11=3113=E31=1313 111111=®' MEIMINEIM3 -100.0% IIIMIIIMIENIENI EM 11 -1000% 111=f�fl11=7/f MTN DMI=MEREM 1 000 sf Mint111111.0 -100.0% 31111....M -100.0% 11.11MIEMMEEIEtl t1111110 -100.0% MIIIMI=Efl121 ®' 1000,0 IDI�I -100.0% 111:11=E1 -100.0% MIETIMEENME3E3 !jj J i •1000% IffiTOMIEEM MEE 1 000 s =E13111=1 -100.0% MEM -100.0% ®® NEM1123511 1000 sf:la 111=111M1 •1000% ffi=.111/ -100.0% 11.21M1.111rEEMIM MilidEWSIMMd ®'W -1000% =MI -1000% 11121MINEDIMINIFE NEN Font Food Rest. w Drive-Thru 1 000 sf 111111.1Mil -1000% EIMIEW1 -100.0% =EEG MER11 1 0. w Enforcement 2009 ITE LUC Land Use Unit Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change RESIDENTIAL. Pa ks & Recreation 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change .1110111111.1... Transportation 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change 1111111111111111111 Educational Facilities 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Administrative Fee 2.516) 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change Total 1011 Fees) 2009 Full Percent Adopted R11C Calculated Change 111.1=1.11 11=111111=1111=3133 MEm IIIIE=13D3 1=3/1133=3/11DIME3 EEMI Sin; leFamll 2000, IINEMED/1311EIME3 MMIENIEDOEMES3 ®E]=3/Z3 =MEM= MEM IMET=IMMIEM =3171=33311111111E3 =1113211:1=111111=11111=1113 IMMEDEMEEMMIM !MIIIIIIIII 1111111111111111.1111111= 11•111111E1111=1 J1ENIEM3 !FE !EfSIMIle ME1333 ®' - =TREIMErrn 11111.11711=3 1000 st IMMESW4 EIEWEINi�2i 1M � �2i�©!2i 0�� E'ui ®i ' 1000,1 f 1 I�El�fl�� immonsrnmorrEn IlrlillE11111E1 11=7IIIIIMIM MEE371 2 . . 1000,[ I® ITEI01 1E111=11n1=11Ee MtIIIME33=CEI 111=2f=1=i1Ei 1FIMIE3 MMIIIIIIMEEMIE 1000sf:1. U=11E331=233 EMENIMIIMIofl MEM 520,459 EMEIEr3®®® mini mom man MITIME313110�' 'a. NEE Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thea 1,000 sF ®=Inl 100.4% ®rtij® Source: Appendix 1, Table 1-1 Notes: (1) "2009 Adopted Rate" column reflects all current adopted fee levels prior to April 22, 2014. Of these, fees for correctional facilities, solid waste and public buildings were suspended. (2) "Affordable Growth" column Indicates the maximum discount that can be provided and still maintain the LOS. The discount is first given to non-residential land uses, and then, to residential land uses, if available. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County ES -6 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County ( Impact Fee Update Study Table ES -3 (Preferred Alternative) Summary of Impact Fees — AU Program Areas (Staff Recommended Fee Rates); Unincorporated County Correctional Facilities 2009 ITE LUC Land Use Unit Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change Solid Waste Facilities 2009 Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change Public Buildings 2009 Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change Libraries 2009 Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change Emergency Services 2009 Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change ZIMIIMMII -100.0% ZEITIMMIREIMMEM mini Sin; eFamil 20005 1.12=151:1117.1 -100.0% 110•100.0% 1111MITEMI ITE12171 -100.0% IIZEIllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllll ®i Milli=lllll711111111lllllllllllllllllllllll21:1 -100.0% 1111=3331-100.0% ®SECIIMITEI NON-RESIDENTIAL Ad• • ed lllllllllllllllllllllff/IIMIlIIMMfl IIIME11113711M31I3 glEMITIMEM=M11 100055 1130213 -100.0% IIMMI®' -100.0% IMMEMIIIMEIMEEIM �fl�llllllllllllllllllll�fl �� WI 1000 sf �� -100.0% �� -100.0% llllllllllllll ® 11:1119!0J51 11:1W11311733 llllllllllllllll sucimgre : loop 33111.1111123 -100.0% W1313 -100.0% MINEEPIIIIMMEE1 INIWfllllllllllllllllllllll6lflllllllllllllllllllllEifl ZiEglIIIIEIS1=11362 22" 1000 sf; la IIIIIIIIENII -100.0% ZIEIM1111.13 -100.0% IIIWINIMIIIIIIIEIHIMEIIEEI -,mucrd®' '' inn Fast Food Rest.w Drive•Thru 1000 s1 iiig 3:1 400.096 Z1111•11111115 -100.0% 1=NEEIMMINIMS313llllllllllllllllee7/1iyfl L. w Enforcement 2009 nE LUC Land Use Unit Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change Pa ks & Recreation 2009 Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change Transportation 2009 Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change Eduertional Fad' les 2009 Percent Adopted Staff Rate Change Adolf lstrative Fee (2.596) 2009 Full Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change 111111011.111 Total (All Fees) 2009 Full, Percent Adopted Rate Calculated Change lllllll�Sin ;leFamil 20005 IINEMINIgnrirli IMIERITIMMIMINENEI 1=336111M31111lllllllllllllllllMMI'IMI®' 111:113111N111111112 MMEEIIIIIIETEEIMI =MII�- u M11117101W2 i INIRICEIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiNI ®' INE:119:111111E712 Ir12111•1111711111111110711®iii 1.1...11111 11.1111111111 IMMIIIIIIIIII. 111111111111111.1 NON-RESIDENTIAL Adored 117.!WCIMEDEZI 15404 IMMIIMMIMEST3 111111111121111=7/1111111r1 MEMEMEIME511 100051 1MEMENWHEI llllllllllllllllllllli!TIMfllNIIMfl � � dflTflIfl �1�N*I TAT e 1000sf 1T� 1111111111E1/1/1 llllllllllllll31311TEIMEIMI IfflNINIERiMINEI 1111Wii1 1111110011MITTIMEM MI : 100055 ®®IMMEM =M1fl1111111117t711fl MIIIIM11111111111711111111E3 llllllllllllllTIZEI Millititle iMINEMIINIM llllllllllllllllefl.+flI!El 0.111151111111 1000sf;la 112111321 7p 7fl 7fl M111=1372=1233 =ZE:mIIII MEM IIIMMI MOM 1111111111EWi® -. Fast Food Rost. w/Drive-15,5P 1,000 sf MONIMMEM1=11133 ®MNEMIn Source: Appendix K, Table K-1 Notes: (1) "2009 Adopted Rate" column reflects all current adopted fee levels prior to April 22, 2014. Of these, fees for correctional facilities, solid waste and public buildings were suspended. (2) "Staff" column Indicates additional policy discounts proposed by Indian River County staff to the affordable growth scenarios. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County ES -7 Impact Fee Update Study ".4 1 Findings of Technical Study Residential Impact Fees 2 3 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 3 1 Me IT -6E5 Consumption -Based Fee Calculation Full update of all impact fee variables Consistent with the 2005 Study Affordable Growth Strategy Based on future growth rate & available funding Buy -down (subsidy) options Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study ' '°`&� t� esi ena n ases 41 A 1aximum GalculatedYFees Unincorporated County (per du) Land Use Current Calculated % Change Study Date 2005/09- 2014 n/a j Single Family ][ - Potential New: Less than 1,000 sf $7,519 $13,544 +80% I - Revised: 1,000 to 1,499 sf 1 $7,519 $14,276 +90% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf $9,388 $15,266 +63% L - 2,500 sf & more $10,195 $16,572 +63% Multi -Family $4,816 $7,923 +65% ' Mobile Home $4,455 ' $8,132 +83% 1 - Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study t�a _� _ �e_c_ornmen atior Affordable Growth Fee for All Program Areas, except: Suspension of library impact fees 50% of affordable growth fees for public bldgs 75% of affordable growth fees for parks Full fee for emergency services Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 3 EResidnt1iLand• seAffordable Growth Fees] Unincorporated County (per du) Land Use Current Aff Growth % Change Study Date 1 2005/09 2014 n/a ,e Single Family , r---------- - ------ - Less than 1,000 sf ---- - r $7,519 $8,258 - --- +9.8% - 1,000 to 1,499 sf $7,519 $8,929 +18.7% ' - 1,500 to 2,499 sf $9,388 $9,864 +5.1% L- 2,500 sf & more IL $10,195 $11,066 +8.5% Multi -Family $4,816 $5,638 +17.1% Mobile Home 1 $4,455 $4,857 +9:0% t�a _� _ �e_c_ornmen atior Affordable Growth Fee for All Program Areas, except: Suspension of library impact fees 50% of affordable growth fees for public bldgs 75% of affordable growth fees for parks Full fee for emergency services Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 3 Land Use Current Staff Fee Recomd % Change • iStudy Date,- ; 2005/09' S I ° 2014' n/at Ligle Family .1; i"„;`,.!„AEc ' x : f• » ` ,..., , x i •4. , — $7,175 —_ - -4.6% .* --.,.--•-rte -Less than- 1,000 sf j` $7,519 • - -----•�- - ?• -1,000 t $7 t_` o'1,499 sf .2 i -,519 i - - 1,500 to 2,4-99 sf " II $9,388 ' -x'.=$7,763 "+3.2% „ ' $8,623 -8.2% D ,- 2,500 sf & more E.21.1.12.5...1_,, f .'1 $9,681 -5.0%_ , Multi -Family - I $4,816 $4,936 +2.5%^ 1 Mobile Home • s [ ; $4,455 ' , $4,101 " f 779771.". 1 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 4 Educational Facilities Impact Fee Examples of Facilities Built Since 2005: Liberty Magnet School (New) Storm Grove Middle School (New) Fellsmere Elementary Expansion Vero Beach Elementary Expansion Vero Beach Senior High School Expansion Sebastian River Middle School Expansion Sebastian River High School Expansion On-Going/Future Projects (CIP): Treasure Coast Elementary Expansion Citrus Elementary Expansion Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study J7 5 1'C1.pac.t Fe -6-MeU 6doJo ()Basic Impact Fee Formula: Net Impact Fee = (Cost - Credit) x Demand 1 1 1 Asset Value Non -Impact per Student Fee Revenue per Student Students per Residential Unit ri ucat a Facil Pies pact Fee j Single Family Residential Cost: Credit: Demand: % Change +92% -18% -19% Effect on Fee Fee: +246% Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Impact Fee Methodologk © Consumption -Based Methodology • Inventory • Facility Service Delivery • Cost Component • Credit Component • Student Generation Rates Educational Facilities ® Current Inventory • 13 Elementary Schools • 4 Middle Schools • 2 High Schools 19 Traditional Schools Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study ief 7 uc ational-Faciies o Facility Service Delivery Description Permanent Net .Square Footage Permanent Student Stations Net Square Feet per Student Station School Type Elementary 1,122,710 7;761 _ 144.7 Middle High 602,578 826,729 4,288 5,235 140.5 Total / Weighted Average 2,552,017 157.9 ;; 147.7 ucatlona acilite o Facility Cost per Student Station: • All costs necessary to operate school • Architect/civil design/site improvements • Construction • Furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FF&E) • Land purchase Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Educational Facilities ()Credits Provided For: • Non -impact fee revenue funding the expansion of new student stations • Future payments for existing debt Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 9 Eaucatlonal sties s t ® School Facility Cost per Student Station Cost Component Elementary Middle High Weighted Average Net Sq. Ft. per Student Station 144.7 140.5 1 157.9 147.7 School Facility Cost Components: Architect/Civil Design/ Site Improv. per Net Sq. ft. r $29.00 $35.00 $37.00 1 $33.01 i `.1 Construction Cost per Net Sq. ft. $145.00 $175.00 $185.00 $165.04 4 FF&E Cost per Net Sq. ft. Ji $10.15 $12.25 $12.95 �! $11.55 ' Land Cost per Net Sq. ft. $11.60 $13.30 $14 50 $12.40 !Total Facility Cost per Net Sq. Ft. i I $195.75 $235.55 $249.45 $222.00 Total Facility Cost per Student Station $28,325 $33,095 $39,388 $32,789 Educational Facilities ()Credits Provided For: • Non -impact fee revenue funding the expansion of new student stations • Future payments for existing debt Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 9 Esu_ ac�o�nal Faces Capital Improvement Credit [Total Revenue Credit per Student $10,404 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study as 10 oe . 4-.2.*,,[�ucatrona „40„..„. ..aci�tTie ® Net Impact Cost per Student Total Impact Cost [—Facility Impact'Cost (Weighted Avg.) Per Student ` $32,789 J Transportation Impact Cost $709 Ancillary Facility Cost - $1.020 Total Impact Cost per Student Revenue Credit Total Revenue Credit per Student Net Impact Cost Net Impact Cost per Student $34,518 $10,404 $24,114 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study as 10 c u �o l` acil i s Student Generation Rates o Based on current student addresses matched with land use classification 1z ® ueationa- - aci,t s o Student Generation Rates Residential Land Use Total Housing Units Number of Students Students per Unit +. Traditional Schools Single Family j 51,423 12,979 0.252 Multi -Family '17,277 t 1,712 0.099 Mobile Home 4.836 733 0.152 Total/Weighted Average 73,536 1 S, 424 0.210 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 11 Educes conal ac Ii ies o Calculated School Impact Fee • Net Impact Cost per Student multiplied by the student generation rate • Residential Land Uses ONLY • Single Family • Multi -Family • Mobile Home Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 12 EE ucatio.al Faclitie Affordable Growth Scenario 160% 140% 120% 100% S 80% o • 60% 28%. 40% 20% I;lt ,hgmnl —Total Cost — Maximum Impact Fee — LOS Curve 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Residential Fee Comparison (per du): Land Use Educational Facilities Current Calculated Affordable Growth Total Residential Fees (Unincorporated County) Current Staff Scenario w/ Calc School IF* Staff Scenario w/ AG School IF Single Family (2K sf) :L $1,756 Multi -Family $500 Mobile Home S $623 $6,077 ` $1,702 $2,387 $668 $3,665 $1,026 $9,388 $12,998 $8,623 $4,816 $6,655 $4,936 $4,455 11 $6,740 1I $4,101 * Only the educational facilities impact fee is shown at calculated rate. All other fees are at staff recommended levels. Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study as 13 /SNR`\ i- . s Educational acirties ,lcIto. Indian River County - Rate Comparison: Land Use Current Calculated Affordable St. Lucie Martin Brevard Growth County County County Study Date 2005 2014 ., 2014 N/A 2008 2004 J ,Single Family (2Ksf) ° $1,756 $6,077 I $1,702 $6,091 $5,567 !, $4;445 Multi -Family (1K sf) ' $500 $2,387 [ $668 $3,115 i $5,355 $2,794 ---7-37z--11-7;;;7- Mobile Home (0.8Kaf) : $623' 3,665 $1,026--$757-ii 1 $3;609 1 $2,667 vTER 11DRIt)?`. __re sentatlon 4 ervxe , 1 2 Implementation Issues 3 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 21, 14 rr rnen atio _pe� ---- �. Issues Timing of Payment: Building Permit Allows time to build the infrastructure Efficiency in coordinating with other jurisdictions 01177 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 15 Iffm Individual Assessments: Focus is the demand component Methodology should be consistent with technical study Differentiating characteristics need to be sustainable over the life of the structure Example: Retirement community with restriction • Portability: Refers to vacant property with impact fees paid & using impact fee credits for a structure on another parcel None of jurisdictions we work with allows for it Difficult to plan for facilities Distorts equity between existing & new development Impact fees run with the land Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 16 BOCC Direction Residential Fee Schedule Adoption Ordinance Preparation & Adoption Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study aq 17 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 18 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Indian River County Community Development Dept. — Planning Division 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 ph (772) 226-1237 June 6, 2014 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 Ashley Drive, Suite 400 Tampa, FL 33602 ph (813) 224-8862, fax (813) 226-2106 ,3i W Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1 Methodology 2 Legal Standard Overview 3 Implementation Issues 6 II. CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES 11 Facility Inventory 11 Service Area and Population 14 Level -of -Service 15 Cost Component 17 Credit Component 18 Net Correctional Facilities Impact Cost 21 Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule 21 Affordable Growth Strategy 23 Staff Recommended Fee Rate 24 Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 24 III. SOLID WASTE FACILITIES 26 Facility Inventory 27 Service Area and Population 27 Cost Component 28 Credit Component 28 Net Solid Waste Impact Cost 30 Calculated Solid Waste Facilities Impact Fee Schedule 30 Affordable Growth Strategy 32 Staff Recommended Fee Rate 32 Solid Waste Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 32 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 i Impact Fee Update Study 33, Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study IV. PUBLIC BUILDINGS 34 Facility Inventory 34 Service Area and Population 37 Level -of -Service 37 Cost Component 39 Credit Component 40 Net Public Buildings Impact Cost 42 Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule 42 Affordable Growth Strategy 44 Staff Recommended Fee Rate 46 Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 48 V. LIBRARIES 50 Facility Inventory 50 Service Area and Population 53 Level -of -Service 53 Cost Component 56 Credit Component 57 Net Library Facilities Impact Cost 58 Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule 59 Affordable Growth Strategy 61 Staff Recommended Fee Rate 62 Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 62 VI. EMERGENCY SERVICES 64 Facility Inventory 64 Service Area and Population 67 Level -of -Service 67 Cost Component 69 Credit Component 70 Net Emergency Services Impact Cost 73 Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule 74 Affordable Growth Strategy 76 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 ii Impact Fee Update Study 3-1 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Staff Recommended Fee Rate 78 Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 78 VII. LAW ENFORCEMENT 80 Facility Inventory 80 Service Area and Population 82 Level -of -Service 82 Cost Component 84 Credit Component 85 Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost 85 Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule 85 Affordable Growth Strategy 87 Staff Recommended Fee Rate 87 Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 87 VIII. PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES 89 Inventory of Land and Recreation Facilities 89 Service Area and Population 91 Level -of -Service 91 Cost Component 94 Credit Component 97 Net Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Cost 100 Calculated Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule 101 Affordable Growth Strategy 101 Staff Recommended Fee Rate 103 Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 103 IX. TRANSPORTATION 105 Demand Component 107 Cost Component 109 Credit Component 115 Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule 118 Affordable Growth Strategy 122 Staff Recommended Fee Rate 125 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 iii Impact Fee Update Study 31 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study X. Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 125 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 127 Facility Inventory 127 Service Area and Enrollment 128 Facility Service Delivery 129 Cost Component 130 Credit Component 136 Net Impact Cost per Student 139 Student Generation Rate 140 Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule 141 Affordable Growth Strategy 141 Staff Recommended Fee Rate 143 Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison 143 APPENDICES Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F: Appendix G: Appendix H: Appendix I: Appendix J: Appendix K: Population Transportation Impact Fee -- Demand Component Calculations Transportation Impact Fee -- Cost Component Calculations Transportation Impact Fee -- Credit Component Calculations Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Building and Land Values Supplemental Information for Correctional, Law Enforcement, Emergency Services, Government Buildings, Library, Parks and Recreation Impact Fees Educational Facilities Impact Fee -- Supplemental Information Administrative Fee Master Fee Schedules (Full Calculated Fee Rates) Master Fee Schedules (Affordable Growth Fee Rates) Master Fee Schedules (Staff Recommended Fee Rates) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 iv Impact Fee Update Study 3S Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study I. Introduction In response to high growth levels and the need to provide infrastructure to support this growth, Indian River County (IRC) implemented a Transportation Impact Fee in 1986. In 2005, the County adopted impact fees in eight more program areas, including: • Correctional Facilities • Solid Waste Facilities • Public Buildings • Library Facilities • Emergency Services • Law Enforcement • Educational Facilities • Parks & Recreation Facilities The technical studies for all program areas were updated in 2007; however, these technical studies were not adopted. Of the nine program areas, only the transportation impact fee was later updated substantially in 2009 by an internally generated County update using data from the 2005 and 2007 studies, resulting in a fee reduction for almost all the land uses. The eight non -transportation program fees were slightly modified in the 2009 update. Since then, the County suspended the collection of five impact fee types to promote construction during the economic downturn, and more recently extended suspension of correctional facilities, solid waste, and public buildings impact fees. Indian River County has retained Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. (TOA) to prepare an update study to reflect changes to the cost, credit, and demand components since the last study. In addition, the study includes "affordable growth" calculations, which take into account the existing development's ability to absorb new growth and calculates the level of possible policy discounts without reducing the level of service. This report serves as the technical study to support the calculation of updated impact fees. Given that the updated fees under the Affordable Growth method indicated a decrease for almost all of the non- residential fee categories, which is consistent with the County's economic development goals, the BOCC adopted the updated fees for non-residential land uses on April 22, 2014. At that time, calculations for residential land uses were not yet finalized due to considerations for expanding the residential land use categories and to allow for some time to obtain the input of the School Board for the educational facilities impact fee. This Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 1 Impact Fee Update Study 3C Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study technical report includes the final calculations for residential land uses in addition to non- residential land uses. It should be noted that figures calculated in this study represent the technically defensible level of impact fees that the County could charge; however, the Board of County Commissioners may choose to discount the fees as a policy decision. In fact, in addition to using the affordable growth fees, the "Staff Recommended Fees" shown in Appendix K include policy discounts proposed by the Indian River County staff for certain program areas, primarily based on a consideration of future capital needs. More specifically, these discounts include the following: • Use of full calculated fees for emergency services program area • Application of a 50 -percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for public buildings impact fees for all land uses • Application of a 25 -percent reduction to affordable growth scenario for parks and recreation facilities impact fees for all land uses • Suspension of the library impact fees Methodology The methodology used to update the County's impact fee program is a consumption -based impact fee methodology, which is used throughout Florida. This methodology was also used in preparing the 2004 and 2005 technical reports for Indian River County and is the basis for the current adopted fees. A consumption -based impact fee charges new development based upon the burden placed on services from each land use (demand). The demand component is measured in terms of population per unit of land use in the case of all impact fee program areas with the exception of educational facilities and transportation. In the case educational facilities, student generation rate is used and in the case of transportation, vehicle -miles of travel is used. A consumption -based impact fee charges new growth the proportionate share of the cost of providing additional infrastructure available for use by new growth. Cost estimates reflect the current value of capital assets for each program area (i.e., the cost to buy or build the same asset today). In addition, per legal requirements, a credit is subtracted from the total cost to account for contributions of the new development toward any capacity expansion projects through other revenue sources. Contributions used to calculate the credit component include estimates of future non -impact fee revenues generated by the new development that will be used toward Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 2 Impact Fee Update Study 37 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study capacity expansion projects. In other words, case law requires that the new development should not be charged twice for the same service. Finally, for all program areas with the exception of transportation, the level of service for impact fee purposes is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for each program area of infrastructure. Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the study shows LOS in terms of related capacity variables, such as acres per population for parks, stations per population for fire/EMS, and building square footage per population for libraries and government buildings, etc. For example, consistent with current practice — and in order to ensure parks funded with impact fees benefit those paying the fees — the parks LOS standard historically has been measured by the value of all park land and the necessary park facilities per resident for impact fee calculation purposes. It is quite common for the make-up of the asset inventory to change over time. In the case of parks, specifically, the County will first buy land and then build necessary park improvements to provide recreational services at parks funded with impact fees. This asset-based approach for non -transportation impact fees was also used in the 2005 technical study, which was the basis for the County's impact fees until this update. Therefore, the County will continue to invest impact fees in park infrastructure (either land or facilities), in order to maintain current levels of service. Legal Standard Overview In Florida, legal requirements related to impact fees have primarily been established through case law since the 1980's. Generally speaking, impact fees must comply with the "dual rational nexus" test, which requires that they: • Be supported by a study demonstrating that the fees are proportionate in amount to the need created by new development paying the fee; and • Be spent in a manner that directs a proportionate benefit to new development, typically accomplished through a list of capacity -adding projects included in the County's Capital Improvement Plan, Capital Improvement Element, or another planning document/Master Plan. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 3 Impact Fee Update Study 3� Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In 2006, the Florida legislature passed the "Florida Impact Fee Act," which recognized impact fees as "an outgrowth of home rule power of a local government to provide certain services within its jurisdiction." § 163.31801(2), Fla. Stat. The statute — concerned with mostly procedural and methodological limitations — did not expressly allow or disallow any particular public facility type from being funded with impact fees. The Act did specify procedural and methodological prerequisites, most of which were common to the practice already. More recent legislation further affected the impact fee framework in Florida, including the following: • HB 227 in 2009: The Florida legislation statutorily clarified that in any action challenging an impact fee, the government has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the imposition or amount of the fee meets the requirements of state legal precedent or the Impact Fee Act and that the court may not use a deferential standard. • SB 360 in 2009: Allowed fees to be decreased without the 90 -day notice period required to increase the fees and purported to change the standard of legal review associated with impact fees. SB 360 also required the Florida Department of Community Affairs (now the Department of Economic Opportunity) and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to conduct studies on "mobility fees," which were completed in 2010. • HB 7207 in 2011: Required a dollar -for -dollar credit, for purposes of concurrency compliance, for impact fees paid and other concurrency mitigation required. The payment must be reduced by the percentage share the project's traffic represents of the added capacity of the selected improvement (up to a maximum of 20% or to an amount specified by ordinance, whichever results in a higher credit). The courts have not yet taken up the issue of whether a local government may still charge an impact/mobility fee in lieu of proportionate share if the impact/mobility fee is higher that the calculated proportionate share contribution. • HB 319 in 2013: Applied mostly to concurrency management authorities, but also encouraged local governments to adopt alternative mobility systems using a series of tools identified in section 3180(5)(f), Florida Statutes, including: 1. Adoption of long-term strategies to facilitate development patterns that support multimodal solutions, including urban design, and appropriate land Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 4 Impact Fee Update Study 3Q Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study use mixes, including intensity and density. 2. Adoption of an area -wide level of service not dependent on any single road segment function. 3. Exempting or discounting impacts of locally desired development, such as development in urban areas, redevelopment, job creation, and mixed use on the transportation system. 4. Assigning secondary priority to vehicle mobility and primary priority to ensuring a safe, comfortable, and attractive pedestrian environment, with convenient interconnection to transit. 5. Establishing multimodal level of service standards that rely primarily on non- vehicular modes of transportation where existing or planned community design will provide adequate level of mobility. 6. Reducing impact fees or local access fees to promote development within urban areas, multimodal transportation districts, and a balance of mixed-use development in certain areas or districts, or for affordable or workforce housing. Also, under HB 319, a mobility fee funding system expressly must comply with the dual rational nexus test applicable to traditional impact fees. Furthermore, any mobility fee revenues collected must be used to implement the local government's plan, which served as the basis for the fee. Finally, under HB 319, an alternative mobility system, that is not mobility fee-based, must not impose upon new development any responsibility for funding an existing transportation deficiency. At this time, Indian River County is not interested in implementing a mobility fee primarily due to the suburban nature of the county. Instead, the County is using the affordable growth approach to reduce fees for non-residential land uses to accomplish its economic development goals. The following paragraphs provide further detail on the generally applicable legal standards applicable here. Impact Fee Definition • An impact fee is a one-time capital charge levied against new development. • An impact fee is designed to cover the portion of the capital costs of infrastructure capacity consumed by new development. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 5 Impact Fee Update Study kip Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • The principle purpose of an impact fee is to assist in funding the implementation of projects identified in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and other capital improvement programs for the respective facility/service categories. Impact Fee vs. Tax • An impact fee is generally regarded as a regulatory function established as a condition for improving property and is not established for the primary purpose of generating revenue, as are taxes. • Impact fee expenditures must convey a proportional benefit to the fee payer. • An impact fee must be tied to a proportional need for new infrastructure capacity created by new development. Authority to Impose Impact Fees in Indian River County • IRC is a non -charter county. o A non -charter county derives its authority from the state constitution and statutory sources; o A non -charter county may adopt ordinances that are not inconsistent with general law; and o A non -charter county may adopt countywide ordinances that do not conflict with municipal ordinances. • The fiscal burden of providing countywide services must be borne by property owners in both the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the county. Implementation Issues This section addresses several considerations as part of the implementation of the impact fee program. Fee Calculations • Calculated impact fees represent a land use's proportionate impact on infrastructure over the life of that land use. For example, a home is likely to go through cycles where at times it houses one or two people, such as a young couple without children or a retired couple, etc. and at other times, a family with several children. The fees are calculated based on the average impact (occupancy) of a home or another land use over its lifetime. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 6 Impact Fee Update Study '11 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • In the case of tiered fees, such as single family residential, office and retail, a different fee for each tier is calculated to reflect the incremental increase in impact on facilities among land uses. This tiered approach increases the fairness and equity among land uses by differentiating the impact of different size buildings on a per unit basis. Any given increase in impact should be charged additional impact fees in order to reflect additional impact on facilities, if applicable, in order to maintain level of service standards and to ensure that existing residents and businesses are not unfairly bearing the burden of new growth. Timing of Fee Payments • Impact fees are typically collected at the building permit stage, which is also the practice used by Indian River County. This allows the County to plan for and build infrastructure needed to timely serve new growth and to effectively coordinate impact fee collections between the County and the municipalities. Fee Schedule Updates • Impact fee calculations should be updated every three to five years to ensure the fees are based on current data. This approach is useful in recognizing more permanent changes and trends as opposed to varying the fee based on short-term fluctuations. Alternative Studies/Individual Assessments • The County's impact fee ordinance currently outlines a process for alternative studies (individual assessments) for determining traffic impact fees when a proposed land use is not expressly included in the fee schedule. The primary considerations for alternative studies (individual assessments) include the following: o The focus of the alternative studies (individual assessments) is the demand component of the land use, which is the subject of the alternative study. Cost and credit components are calculated based on countywide facilities and investment levels and are not the subject of an alternative study. o The study should clearly identify the differences in the demand component of the actual use and the closest land use category in the fee schedule in order to verify the actual impacts of the proposed land use over the life of the use. For example, if not included in the fee schedule, a retirement community may have different demand characteristics than the average single family subdivision. However, this community must be restricted (with Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 7 Impact Fee Update Study y2 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study the County as a party to or having confirmed that restriction) for a different fee to be calculated for a retirement community. Without such restriction, the retirement community, in this example, could change to other residential uses over time, creating a different impact on the community. o Land uses included in the fee schedule table have impacts on public facilities that have been widely documented for impact fee purposes. For example, in the case of traffic impact fees, there is a large sample of trip characteristics data on single family subdivisions located in Florida. Therefore, an alternative study (individual assessment) for a specific single family subdivision is not needed or appropriate to establish the level of impact single family homes have on roads. Trip characteristics data already include a range of travel characteristics and eliminate outliers prior to using an average travel demand representative of the land use category. This approach verifies that there is a "reasonable connection" or "nexus" between the impacts of each listed land use and the calculated fees. o For all program areas, the demand components (measured in terms of persons per unit or students per unit for categories other than transportation) should be studied when either the proposed land use is not listed or the applicant demonstrates that the impacts of the proposed use are significantly different than those captured in the study. The current data that support the non -transportation impact fees are based on Census data for Indian River County or student addresses matched with the land use type from the Indian River County Property Appraiser database for residential land uses. These data are representative of average local development and are the most current data available. As mentioned previously, a study would be appropriate only when the development type is completely different than the land uses included in the fee schedule and this difference can be maintained over the life of the development due to its nature or through legal restrictions. o Individual assessments should be generally consistent with the methodology used in this study. Portability • Impact fees are attached to the project property and are calculated to mitigate the land use's proportionate impact on County facilities. Once that land use is permitted, the County will provide needed facilities as required by its own Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 8 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study ordinances. If a land use is later proposed that has a greater impact on County facilities than did the previously approved land use, then, of course, impact fees for the new land use would be limited to an amount that simply reflects the increased impact. However, the question frequently arises of whether impact fees should be returned (in cash or as "portable" credits, for example) if the intensity of a land use is reduced or terminated in the future. "Portability," some argue, would allow the credit associated with tearing down a building to be used for another parcel. However, none of the jurisdictions we work with allow for the portability of impact fees that we are aware of, due to a number of reasons. First, local governments plan for capital project funding and provide infrastructure based on development in an area. As part of that process, impact fee revenues are programmed and spent for the construction of necessary infrastructure in the same district as the proposed use. Once the applicant has moved forward with its development, so too does the County with the development's needed infrastructure for that property in that area of the County. Once these fees are committed for use to serve a proposed development, they cannot be "uncommitted," and, of course, previously -built and contracted infrastructure improvements cannot be "ported" to new locations or benefit districts. Second, if the County "refunded" fees to properties that reduce or eliminate their impacts, those "refunds" (having now been committed to meet the needs of the initial land use) would necessarily redirect impact fees paid by others or general fund sources, creating a misallocation of burden between existing development and new growth. Third, during the typical construction timeframe, running from building permit issuance to certificate of occupancy, impact fees paid by a developer will not have been committed and spent by the County. Therefore, if a proposed land use pays impact fees (at building permit) but never comes to fruition (i.e., fails to receive a certificate of occupancy) then impact fees paid by the applicant can be safely returned without disrupting the County's CIP and budgeting process or unfairly shifting costs to existing development or other fee payers. This policy, of course, should be used only during this limited time and should be tied to the termination of Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 9 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study issued building permits to reflect the fact that the development (and therefore the need for new infrastructure capacity) will not occur. Finally, it should be noted that the payment of impact fees on a given parcel relieves future owners or developers of that parcel from the need to pay fees for those impacts in the future, which, presumably, is reflected in the value of the parcel, even if there is a subsequent change of use. In this sense, the individual's investment in impact fees can be "recouped," so to speak in the value added to the parcel. This technical report has been prepared to support legal compliance with existing case law and statutory requirements. Although the Florida courts have yet to expressly address the methodology underpinning the Affordable Growth Strategy, this aspect of the report is based on the long-standing legal standards described in this section. The technical report also documents the methodology components for each of the impact fee areas in the following sections, including an evaluation of the inventory, service area, level -of -service (LOS), cost, credit, and demand components. Information supporting this analysis was obtained from the County and other sources, as indicated. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 10 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study II. Correctional Facilities Correctional facility impact fees are used to fund capital construction and expansion of services related to land, facilities, and capital equipment required to support the additional correctional facility demand created by new growth. This section presents the results of the correctional facility impact fee update study for the County and will serve as the technical support document for the updated correctional facilities impact fee schedule. There are several major elements associated with the development of the correctional facilities impact fee. These include: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Correctional Facilities Impact Cost • Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Staff Recommended Fee Rate • Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison These various elements are summarized in the remainder of this section, with the result being the calculated correctional facilities impact fee schedule. Facility Inventory The correctional facilities inventory includes the County's jails and other related facilities that are primarily for the provision of corrections and does not include any of the buildings or portions thereof included in the calculation of other impact fees. According to information provided by the County, Indian River County has a total of 258,000 square feet of correctional facility -related space. This includes the square footage of all four phases of the Correctional Facility as well as other related buildings, such as the guardhouses, warehouse visitation building, and maintenance shop. Table 1 presents a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 11 Impact Fee Update Study 414 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study summary of the correctional facilities land and building inventory, including a total land value of $1.8 million and a total building value of $63 million. As previously mentioned, these values do not include building space or land associated with other County departments. The building value per square foot is estimated based on research on recently built correctional facilities, discussions and information from architectural and construction companies, and the insurance values of the existing correctional facilities in Indian River County. This value is estimated at $250 per square foot for correctional facilities and $125 per square foot for the other ancillary facilities included in the inventory. Appendix F provides further detail on the building cost estimates. The land value for correctional facilities is estimated at $50,000 per acre based on an analysis of vacant land values and parcels sold in the County over the last three years as well as the value of land where the current facilities are located (see Appendix F). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 12 Impact Fee Update Study 4? Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-1 Correctional Facilities Land and Building Inventory Facility Description,,,(3 IRC Correctional Facility Phase I(5) Year Acquired/Built 1987 Number of Acres(/) 9.81 Square Feet(1) 67,716 Number of Beds(1) 149 Land Value(2) $490,500 Building Value'(4) $16,929,000 Total Building and Land Value $17,919,500 IRC Correctional Facility Phase II(5) 1988 120 IRC Correctional Facility Phase III 1991 10.00 142 $500,000 IRC Correctional Facility Phase IV 2008 16.70 181,000 301 $835,000 $45,250,000 $46,085,000 Miscellaneous Buildings on Site(6): Guardhouse n/a n/a 100 n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500 Guardhouse n/a n/a 100 n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500 Maintenance Shop 2008 n/a 100 n/a n/a $12,500 $12,500 Warehouse Visitation 2008 n/a 8,884 n/a n/a $1,110,500 $1,110,500 Total 36.51 257,900 712 $1,825,500 $63,327,000 $65,152,500 Operational Capacity Beds() 612 Building Value per Square Foot(8) $246 Land Value per Acre(9) 1 $50,000 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Number of acres multiplied by the land value per acre (Item 9) (3) Square feet multiplied by $250 in the case of correctional facilities and $125 in the case of miscellaneous buildings (4) Sum of land and building value (5) Since the Correctional Facility and Detention Complex and the Sheriff's Administration Building are located at the same site, it was assumed that each occupies 50 percent of the site 1 (6) These buildings are on the same parcels as the correctional facilities (7) Operational capacity beds is lower due to requirements to keep inmates separate based on their custody levels and classifications (8) Total building value (Item 3) divided by total square footage (9) Estimated based on vacant land sales and values for parcels with similar acreage as well as the value of the current inventory Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. i June 2014 DO Indian River County 13 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In addition to land and building costs, the correctional facility services also require the use of necessary equipment and vehicles. As presented in Table 11-2, the total vehicle and equipment value is estimated at $2.8 million based on information provided by the County. Table 11-2 Correctional Facilities Equipment and Vehicle Inventory Facility Description Vehicles Units(1) 19 Unit Value(2) $31,437 Total Value(3) $597,295 Vehicle/Radio Equipment 377 $1,172 $441,953 Weapons 212 $464 $98,375 Office Equipment 1 $31,784 $31,784 Specialty Vehicles/Equipment 3 $19,966 $59,899 Electronic Equipment 1 $1,077,078 $1,077,078 Computer Equipment 20 $4,099 $81,977 Miscellaneous Equipment 40 $9,806 $392,240 Total Vehicle/Equipment Cost -- $2,780,601 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Total value (Item 3) divided by units (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County Service Area and Population The correctional facilities impact fee program requires the use of population data in calculating current level of service. To be consistent with the population utilized in the County's comprehensive planning process, this impact fee study considers not only the resident or permanent population of the County, but also the number of seasonal residents and visitors as well. Therefore, for purposes of this technical analysis, the weighted seasonal population will be used in all population estimates and projections. Weighted seasonal population projections used in the impact fee analysis reflect estimates provided in the Indian River County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan for seasonal residents. In addition, correctional facilities is one of the program areas where functional population is used to capture the presence of all people within the community, whether residents, workers, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of effective population need to be served. A more detailed explanation of weighted and functional population estimates is provided in Appendix A. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 14 Impact Fee Update Study AO Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Level -of -Service As presented in Table 11-3, there is a relation between population growth and the need for correctional facilities. Table 11-3 presents the average daily jail population over the last ten years, along with the corresponding population. The relation between the population and jail population is used to establish a general trend in the need for correctional facility beds, and to account for random fluctuations, the three-year average number of bookings and population also is shown. Table 11-3 Service Area Population and Jail Bookings Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Population(1) 126,869 131,175 134,573 139,121 143,177 Average Daily Jail Population(2) 473 529 543 562 544 3 -Year Average Population Bookings n/a n/a 130,872 134,956 138,957 n/a n/a 515 545 550 Change in 3 -Year Average Population Bookings n/a n/a n/a 3.1% 3.0% n/a n/a n/a 5.8% 0.9% 2008 145,212 537 142,503 548 2.6% -0.4% 2009 145,356 513 144,582 531 1.5% -3.1% 2010 145,854 518 145,474 523 0.6% -1.5% 2011 146,325 490 145,845 507 0.3% -3.1% 2012 147,118 446 146,432 485 0.4% -4.3% (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1 (2) Source: Indian River County For planning purposes, the level -of -service (LOS) for correctional facility services is expressed in terms of jail facility beds per 1,000 residents. Using this method, Indian River County's current achieved LOS is 4.14 beds per 1,000 residents. The County's current adopted LOS standard for correctional facilities is 4.5 beds per 1,000 residents. Given that the achieved LOS is lower than the adopted standard, impact fee calculations for correctional facilities are based on the achieved LOS. As mentioned previously, for impact fee calculations, the LOS should be measured using functional population to capture workers, visitors, and residents to calculate the correctional facilities impact fee. In terms of functional population, the current LOS is 4.37 beds per 1,000 functional residents. Table 11-4 summarizes the calculation of the county's current LOS using both weighted seasonal population and functional population. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 15 Impact Fee Update Study So Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-4 Current Level -of -Service Component Population(') Number of Beds(2) LOS (beds per 1,000 residents)i3i Adopted LOS Standard (beds per 1,000 residents)141 Year2013 Weighted Functional Population Population 148,001 612 4.14 4.50 140,186 612 4.37 4.75 (1) Appendix A, Table A-1 for weighted seasonal population and Table A-8 for functional population (2) Source: Table 11-1 (3) Number of beds (Item 2) divided by the population (Item 1), multiplied by 1,000 (4) Source: Indian River County; LOS standard for functional resident is calculated based on the ratio of actual LOS in terms of weighted population versus functional population Table 11-3 summarizes a LOS comparison between Indian River County and counties with correctional facility impact fees throughout the State of Florida. The LOS is displayed in terms of permanent population for 2012 for all entities because functional population data analysis has not been completed for these entities, as it was for Indian River County. In addition, the number of beds for all jurisdictions presented in the following table is based on gross beds. As presented, Indian River County's LOS is within the range of these counties. Although the LOS is measured in terms of beds per population for planning purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for each program area of infrastructure. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net impact cost per resident for correctional facilities, which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes. It is important to note that the construction of correctional facilities tend to be "lumpy" and requires significant investments for large scales of construction. Indian River County completed its most recent expansion in 2008, which was funded primarily with sales tax revenues, and currently does not have any plans to build additional jails. In addition, the average daily occupancy of approximately 450 inmates represents 75 percent of the available functional capacity. As mentioned previously, correctional impact fees are not being collected in Indian River County at this time, and there appears to be sufficient Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 16 Impact Fee Update Study 6I Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study capacity available to accommodate additional inmates due to growth in the near future. This will be addressed further in the Affordable Growth section of the report. Table 11-5 Level -of -Service Comparison Jurisdiction Osceola County Gross Beds(1) 873 2012 Permanent Population() 280,866 LOS (Beds per 1,000 Residents)131 3.11 Brevard County 1,709 545,625 3.13 St. Johns County 664 196,071 3.39 Collier County 1,304 329,849 3.95 Hernando County 818 173,104 4.73 St. Lucie County 1,370 280,355 4.89 Indian River County (Existing) 712 139,446 5.11 Highlands County 504 98,955 5.09 Citrus County 760 140,761 5.40 Okeechobee County 232 39,805 5.83 Charlotte County 960 163,357 5.88 (1) Source: Each jurisdiction's respective Sheriff's Office or Correctional Facilities Department (2) Source: University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research (3) Gross beds (Item 1) divided by the 2012 permanent population (Item 2) divided by 1,000 for each jurisdiction Cost Component Table 11-4 provides the total asset value per resident. As shown, total asset value owned by the County amounts to $67.9 million or $111,000 per bed. The total impact cost per functional resident for correctional facilities in Indian River County is calculated by multiplying the total cost per bed by the LOS (beds per 1,000 functional residents) and dividing that figure by 1,000, which is approximately $485 per functional resident. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 17 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-6 Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident Description Building Value�1 Figure $63,327,000 Percent of Total Valuel71 93.22% Land Value(1) $1,825,500 2.69% Equipment Value(2)$2,780,601 4.09% Total Asset Value $67,933,101 100.00% Number of Beds(3) 612 Net Asset Value per Bed(4) $111,002 Current LOS (Beds per 1,000 Functional Residents)I51 4.37 Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(6) $485.08 1) Source: Table 11-1 2) Source: Table 11-2 3) Source: Table 11-4 4) Total asset value divided by the number of beds (Item 3) 5) Source: Table 11-4 (6) Net asset value per bed (Item 4) multiplied by the current correctional facilities LOS (Item 5) divided by 1,000 (7) Percent of building value, land value, and equipment value of the total asset value Credit Component To avoid overcharging new development for the correctional facility impact fee, a review of the capital financing program for correctional services was completed. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential revenue credits generated by new development that are being used for expansion of capital facilities, land, and equipment included in the inventory. Capital Expansion Expenditures Credit The capital expansion expenditures credit per functional resident was calculated based on the capital expansion projects that were completed over the past five years and those programmed for the next five years. The average annual capital expansion expenditures were divided by the average functional residents for the same period in order to calculate the average capital expansion cost per functional resident. The County completed Phase IV expansion of the correctional facilities in 2008, which was funded with sales tax revenues. Since then, there have not been any capacity expansion Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 18 Impact Fee Update Study 53 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study projects and there are none programmed for the next five years. This spending associated with a portion of the Phase IV expansion results in an average capital expansion expenditure of $2.3 million per year. Since the review of these expenditures spanned Fiscal Years 2008 through 2017, the average annual capital expansion cost is divided by the average functional population for this same period. As shown in Table 11-7, the result is an average expansion cost of $16 per functional resident. It should be noted that although the optional sales tax will expire in 2019, this analysis assumes that, if the sales tax is not re -adopted, another revenue source will be used in the future. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 19 Impact Fee Update Study S'4 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-7 Historical Capital Expansion Expenditures(1) Description FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Total Optional Sales Tax Revenues Housing Unit E Construction $22,756,006 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ $22,756,006 Total $22,756,006 - - - - - - - - - $22,756,006 Average Annual Capital Expendituresm $2,275,601 Average Annual Functional Population(3) 140,301 Expenditure per Functional Resident(4) $16.22 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Average capital expenditures over the ten-year period (3) Source: Appendix A, Table A-11 (4) Average annual capital expansion expenditures (Item 2) divided by average functional population (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 20 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Correctional Facilities Impact Cost The net correctional impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table 11-8 summarizes the calculation of the net correctional facility cost per resident. The first section of Table 11-8 identifies the total impact cost as $485 per functional resident for correctional facilities. The second section of the table identifies the revenue credits for the impact fee. The credit calculation includes a total of approximately $299 per functional resident. The net impact cost per resident is the different between the total impact cost and the total revenue credit per resident. This results in a net impact cost of $186 per functional resident, which also represents the LOS for impact fee purposes. Table 11-8 Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident Calculation Step Impact Cost Impact Cost Revenue Credits Total Impact Cost per Functional Residentili $485.08 - Revenue Credit Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Resident(2) $16.22 Capitalization Rate 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) 25 Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Residential $298.84 Net Impact Cost Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident(4) 1 $186.24 - (1) Source: Table 11-6 (2) Source: Table 11-7 (3) Source: The present value of the capital improvement credit per functional resident (Item 2) at a discount rate of 2.5% with a capitalization period of 25 years. The discount rate was provided by Indian River County. (4) Total impact cost per resident (Item 1) less the total revenue credit per resident (Item 3) Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Table 11-9 presents the calculated correctional facilities impact fee schedule for residential and non-residential land uses, based on the net impact fee cost per resident figures presented in Table 11-8. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 21 Impact Fee Update Study 64 Indian River County ( Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-9 Calculated Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Impact LUC Land Use Unit RESIDENTIAL: Functional Total Impact Resident Coefficient nl Feel') 2009 Percent Adopted Fee (3) Change(`) 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 1.35 5251 $151 66.2% - 1,000 to 1,499sf du 1.45 $270 $151 78.8% - 1,500 to 2,499sf du 1.54 5287 $170 68.8% - 2,500 sf or greater du 1.72 $320 $184 73.9% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.87 $162 5100 62.0% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 0.98 5183 $123 48.8% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 0.65 $121 599 22.2% 320 Motel room 0.60 $112 599 13.1% 252/620 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 5171 $107 59.8% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic10,000sf or less 1,000sf 1.14 5212 $186 14.0% Medica) Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,O00sf 1.66 $309 5186 66.1% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 2.23 $415 $212 95.8% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 2.28 $425 5174 144.3% 710 General Office 1,000sf 1.00 $186 5153 21.6% 760 Research& Development Center 1,000sf 0.85 5158 581 95.1% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 0.50 593 $55 69.1% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0.28 $52 $42 23.8% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 0.06 511 $8 37.5% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000sf 0.14 526 $42 -38.1% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 0.69 5129 575 72.0% n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55 5289 5165 75.2% n/a Sand Mining acre 0.20 $37 521 76.2% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000gsf 2.37 $441 $312 41.3% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 1.91 5356 5188 89.4% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 1.47 $274 5186 47.3% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 6.78 $1,263 $800 57.9% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 8.90 51,658 $863 92.1% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 2.05 $382 $222 72.1% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,O0Osf 1.50 $279 570 298.6% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 $162 5206 -21.4% 853 Convenience Market w/Gas Pumps 1,000sf 5.83 51,086 $463 134.6% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 0.23 543 535 22.9% RECREATIONAL : 430 Golf Course hole 1.08 5201 5267 -24.7% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 3.09 $575 $259 122.0% 412 County Park acre 0.20 $37 517 117.6% 491 Tennis Court court 3.16 5589 $253 132.8% 420 Marina berth 0.19 $35 $17 105.9°% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000sf 1.62 5302 $194 55.7% 590 Library 1,000sf 1.76 $328 5188 74.5% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf 1.39 5259 5148 75.056 MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 0.89 5166 5110 50.9% 610 Hospital 1,000sf 1.37 5255 5171 49.1% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 2.54 $473 5178 165.7% 560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 $95 558 63.8°% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 $1,114 5925 20.4% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0.06 511 $10 10.0% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0.07 $13 $10 30.0% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0.08 $15 $13 15.4% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 519 $11 72.7% n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf 0.63 5117 $69 69.6% Note: gsf = g oss square feet (1) Functional resident coefficients from Appendix A, Table A-12 for residen ial and lodging land uses and Table A-15 for non-residential land uses. (2) Proposed impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost per functional resident (Table II -8) by the functional resident coefficient (Item 1) for each land use. (3) Source: Indian River County; does not include administrative fee; fees are currently suspended (4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates (Item 3) to the total impact fee (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County 22 Impact Fee Update Study s? Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy In the case of correctional facilities, based on a review of capital expansion expenditures between Fiscal Years 2008 and 2017, the County uses approximately $2.3 million per year of non -impact fee funding. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure 11-1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum impact fee calculated in this report. This level is considered the investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of correctional facilities impact fee calculated, if the historical levels of non -impact fee funding were to be continued, the County would not need any impact fee revenue to continue to maintain the current LOS. It should be noted that the historical average non -impact fee contribution is based on spending made for the last jail expansion, which was completed in 2008. Since then, the County did not have any non -impact fee spending and does not have any capacity expansion projects programmed in the CIP. This is reflective of "lumpy" nature of jail construction in that correctional facilities tend to require large scale investments that provide sufficient capacity for a longer term than most other infrastructure types. As mentioned previously, the current jail population is approximately 75 percent of the jail functional capacity. 300% — 250% 20096 - t7 jo 150% s 100% - 50% 0% Figure 11-1 Correctional Facilities Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Approach IRC Average Annual Growth —Total Cost —Maximum Impact Fee - LOS Curve 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.0096 4.0096 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 23 Impact Fee Update Study 5$ Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Staff Recommended Fee Rate For correctional facilities impact fee, the County staff recommends suspending the impact fee based on the affordable growth calculations included in the previous section. Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's correctional facilities impact fee program, a comparison of correctional facilities impact fee schedules was completed for other Florida counties. Table 11-10 presents this comparison. As presented, Indian River County's calculated fee is within the range of fees adopted by other Counties. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 24 Impact Fee Update Study Sel Indian River County ( Impact Fee Update Study Table 11-10 Correctional Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Land Use Date of Last Update Indian River County Unithl Izl Affordable 41 Calculated (3I Staff Growth(3) 2013 2013 2013 2009 Brevard Adopted Count (6) P y 2005 2000 Okeechobee Collier Hernando Highlands YI'l Ya) County(9) ypol Count Count Count Count 2012 2009 2005 2006 Adoption Percentage 100% n/a n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Residential: Single Family(2,000sf) du $287 $0 $0 $170 $72 $533 $488 $7 $684 Non -Residential: Light Industrial 1,000sf $129 $0 $0 $75 n/a $110 $176 $3 n/a Office (50,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf $186 $0 $0 $153 $34 $258 $362 $5 n/a Retail (100,000sgft) 1,000sf $441 $0 $0 $312 $160 $551 $670 $10 n/a Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $425 $0 $0 $174 $81 $551 $604 $10 n/a Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $1,658 $0 $0 $863 $428 $551 $2,297 $16 n/a (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table 11-9 (3) Calculated based on an annual growth rate of 1.4% and non -impact fee spending of $2.3 million per year (4) Source: Indian River County Staff recommends the affordable growth fee rates (5) Source: Indian River County; fees are currently suspended (6) Source: Brevard County Planning & Development Department; Industrial land uses are exempt from impact fees (7) Source: Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners Administrative Department (8) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing (9) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department (10) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28; Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30, 2014 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 25 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study III. Solid Waste Facilities This section provides the results of the solid waste facilities impact fee analysis. There are several major elements associated with the development of the solid waste facilities impact fee: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Solid Waste Impact Cost • Calculated Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Staff Recommended Fee Rate • Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Comparison These various elements are summarized in this section. It should be noted that solid waste impact fees are not very common and there is limited literature. Solid waste operations are typically an Enterprise Fund and tend to be self-sufficient in terms of funding. In the case of Indian River County, the Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), a dependent district, provides the solid waste services. At this time, the solid waste impact fee is suspended in Indian River County. Prior to the suspension, the County charged a solid waste impact fee to both residential and non- residential land uses. These fees were calculated taking into account both the landfill and garbage trucks used for waste collection. Since the last study, the County started outsourcing the waste collection service. The landfill is used by both existing and new growth on a continuous basis, and as such, it is difficult to establish a need directly tied to new growth. In this study, the impact fee calculations are based on the customer convenience centers, which are used only by residential land uses. Given this, the revised fee schedule includes only residential land uses. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 26 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Facility Inventory As mentioned previously, the SWDD has the landfill site and also operates five customer convenience centers throughout the District for the collection of Class I waste, yard trash, cardboard, newsprint, and mixed recyclables. The landfill and operations of the customer convenience centers are funded through an annual non -ad -valorem assessment and tipping fees charged at the landfill. In addition, an outside contractor provides waste collection services. As explained previously, the inventory related to the new growth consists of the customer convenience centers, which are summarized in Table III -1. The value of customer convenience center buildings and land are based on the most recently built center and the value of existing properties. A more detailed explanation is provided in Appendix F. Table III -1 Summary of SWDD Capital Facilities Inventory Total Facility Facility Land Facility Description Acres(1) & Land Value (2) Value (3) Value (4) Transfer1Stations: Winter Beach Customer Convenience Center 19.55 $2,600,000 $391,000 $2,991,000 Roseland Customer Convenience Center 1.38 $2,600,000 $27,600 $2,627,600 Gifford Customer Convenience Center 10.81 $2,600,000 $216,200 $2,816,200 Oslo Customer Convenience Center 11.61 $2,600,000 $232,200 $2,832,200 Fellsmere Customer Convenience Center 4.75 $2,600,000 $95,000 $2,695,000 Total 'Land 48.10 $13,000,000 $962,000 $13,962,000 ' Value perAcrelsl $20,000 - (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Based on the cost of on-going expansion of the Oslo Customer Convenience Center (3) Acres (Item 1) multiplied by the land value per acre (Item 6) (4) Sum of the building (item 3) and land value (Item 4) (5) Based on a review of values of land where existing facilities are located and vacant land sales and values Service Area and Population Solid waste facilities are provided on a countywide basis. Because customer convenience centers serve only the residential customers, weighted population is used in this analysis. The County's current weighted seasonal population estimate and future population projections are provided in Appendix A, Table A-1 (countywide). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 27 Impact Fee Update Study (oz Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component Table III -2 presents a summary of asset value related to the solid waste impact fee and resulting value per resident ($94 per person). It should be noted that this amount also reflects an average annual residential solid waste generation rate of 0.7 tons per capita per year. Table III -2 Net Impact Cost per Resident Capital Asset Component Total BuildingValuelll Total Land Value(2) Total Asset Valuel3) 2013 Population(4) Total Solid Waste Asset Value per Resident(5) Percent of Figure Total Value(6) $13,000,000 $962,000 $13,962,000 148,001 $94.34 93% 7% 100% (1) Source: Table III -1 (2) Source: Table III -1 (3) Sum of the total building value (Item 1) and the total land value (Item 2) (4) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1; Countywide (5) Total asset value (Item 3) divided by population (Item 4) (6) Each component divided by total asset value Credit Component To avoid overcharging new development for the solid waste facility impact fee, a review of the capital financing program for customer care facilities was completed. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential revenue credits generated by new development that are being used for expansion of capital facilities and land included in the inventory. As presented in Table III -3, the County uses an average annual amount of approximately $252,000 of the SWDD's revenues toward the construction/expansion of customer convenience center expansion. This amount results in an annual expenditure of approximately $1.62 per resident, which is used the calculated the impact fee credit. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 28 Impact Fee Update Study �3 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table III -3 Historical and Planned Capital Expansion Expenditures Description(l) FY 2008 FY 2009 SWDD FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 - FY 2027 Total Fellsmere Customer Convenience Center- - $2,106,493 - - - - - - $2,106,493 Roseland Customer Convenience Center - - - - - - - $960,000 - $960,000 Oslo Customer Convenience Center - - - - - $1,250,000 - - - $1,250,000 Gifford Customer Convenience Center _ _ _ _ _ _ $715,000 = _ $715,000 Total - - $2,106,493 - - $1,250,000 $715,000 $960,000 $0 $5,031,493 Average Annual Capital Expenditures(2) $251,575 Average Annual Weighted Population(3) 155,514 Expenditure per Resident(9) moron (1) Source: Indian River County, includes only the expenditures associated with capacity expansion (estimated at 50% of total amount for Roseland, Oslo and Gifford Centers) (2) Total expenditures divided by 20 years due to high investment levels during the 2008-2017 period, which are likely to repeat every 20 years based on information provided by Indian River County. (3) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1; Countywide (4) Average annual capital expenditures (Item 2) divided by the average annual weighted population (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 29 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Solid Waste Impact Cost The net impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table III -4 summarizes the calculation of the net solid waste impact cost per resident, which is also the relevant LOS for impact fee purposes and should be included in the Comprehensive Plan as such. Table III -4 Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident Calculation Step Impact Cost Impact Cost Revenue Credits Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(1) $94.34 Revenue Credit Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Resident�1 $1.62 Capitalization Rate 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) 25 Capital Expansion Credit per Functional Resident(3) $29.85 Net Impact Cost Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident(4) $64.491 (1) Source: Table III -2 (2) Source: Table III -3 (3) Source: The present value of the capital improvement credit per functional resident (Item 2) at a discount rate of 2.5% with a capitalization period of 25 years (4) Total impact cost per resident (Item 1) less the capital expansion credit per resident (Item 3) Calculated Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule The calculated solid waste impact fee for each residential land use is presented in Table III - 5. The net impact cost per resident calculated in the previous section is applied to the average persons per unit by land use. The resulting total impact fees per dwelling unit range from $79 for the multi -family residential land use to $163 for single family land use with 2,500 square feet or more space. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 30 Impact Fee Update Study bS Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 111-5 Calculated Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC Land Use RESIDENI7AL• Net Cost Total 2009 Impact Residents Percent Unit er Unit"' per Impact Adopted Chan Change(S) p Resident") Fee") Fee")g 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 1.97 564.49 5127 $75 69.3% - 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 2.12 $64.49 5137 $75 82.731 -1,500to2,499sf du 2.26 564.49 $146 $75 94.731 - 2,500 sf or greater du 2.52 $64.49 5163 575 117.3% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 1.28 564.49 583 $57 45.6% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 1.44 $64.49 $93 575 24.0% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP 310 Hotel room n/a n/a 50 $21 -100.0% 320 Motel room n/a n/a $0 521 -100.0% 260 Nursing Home bed n/a n/a 50 $33 -100.0% 252 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACIF) bed n/a n/a 50 $62 -100.0% OFFICE& FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000sforless 1,000sf n/a n/a $0 5118 -100.0% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000sf n/a n/a 50 5118 -100.0% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,CO3 sf _ _ _ _ n/a _ n/a $0 5118 -100.0% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 5118 -100.0% 710 General Office LOCO sf n/a n/a 50 594 -100.0% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 594 -100.0% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf n/a n/a 50 $236 -100.094 150 Warehousing 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 $47 -100.0% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,C00 sf n/a n/a 50 519 -100.0% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 $47 -100.0% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf n/a n/a 50 $236 -100.0% n/a Concrete Plant acre n/a n/a $0 5213 -100.0% n/a Sand Mining acre n/a n/a 50 $213 -100.0% RETAIL. 820 Retail Center 1,000sfgla n/a n/a $0 $236 -100.0% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. n/a n/a $0 539 -100.0% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 $118 -100.096 932 Restaurant 1,OOOsf n/a n/a 50 $330 -100.0% 934 Fast Food Rest w/ Drive-Thru 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 5330 -100.0% 850 Supermarket 1,OOOsf n/a n/a 50 $424 -100.0% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf n/a n/a 50 520 -100.0% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay n/a n/a 50 $77 -100.0% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 $424 -100.0% 890 Fumiture Store 1,000sf n/a n/a $0 $236 -100.0% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole n/a n/a 50 538 -100.0% 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf n/a n/a $0 5118 -100.0% 412 County Park site n/a n/a 50 $85 -100.0% 491 Tennis Court court n/a n/a 50 $18 -100.0% 420 Marina berth n/a n/a 50 545 -100.0% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,C00 sf n/a n/a 50 594 -100.0% 590 Library 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 594 -100.0% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf n/a n/a $0 594 -100.0% 571 Jail bed n/a n/a $0 516 -100.096 MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 $236 -100.0% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf n/a n/a 50 $83 -100.0% 640 Veterinary Clinic LOCO sf n/a n/a 50 5118 -100.0% 560 Church 1,000sf n/a n/a 50 533 -100.0% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen n/a n/a 50 5188 -100.0% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student n/a n/a Su 512 -100.0% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student n/a n/a 50 $12 -100.0% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student n/a n/a $0 513 -100.0% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student n/a n/a 50 513 -100.0% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf n/a n/a 50 594 -100.0% (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-2 (2) Source: Table III -4 (3) Residents per unit (Item 1) multiplied by the net cost per resident (Item 2) (4) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include administrative fee (5) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates (Item 4) to the total impact fee (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 31 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy As presented in Figure III -1, due to the availability of a large amount of non -impact fee revenue and relatively low growth rate, the County does not need any impact fee revenues to maintain the current LOS. If the County decides not to use the recurring revenues toward future customer convenience centers, the calculated impact fee for a mid-size single family home would be approximately $213 ($94.34 multiplied by 2.26 persons per housing unit) and the full impact fee would be needed for this service. 160%T 140% 120% 40% 20% 0% Figure III -1 Solid Waste Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Approach _--__ u-- IRC Average _..Annual ./.....*.'....°--------" Total Cost Maximum Impact fee Las Curve 0.0095 1.00% 2.0090 3.0096 4.0045 5.0096 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% •Annual Growth Rate Staff Recommended Fee Rate In the case of solid waste impact fees, the County staff recommends suspending the fee schedule based on affordable growth calculations. Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As mentioned previously, solid waste impact fees are relatively rare. Table III -6 presents the comparison of Indian River County's existing and calculated fees to those jurisdictions that do collect a solid waste impact fee. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 32 Impact Fee Update Study G7 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table III -6 Solid Waste Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Land Use Unit(1) Calculated(2) Indian River County Affordable Growth(3) Staffr4) 2009 Brevard City of North City of Fort Adopted Raters) County (8) Port(') Pierce (8) Date of Last Update 2013 2013 2013 2005 2000 2011 2007 Adoption Percentage 100% n/a n/a 100% 100% 50% 60% Residential: Single Family (2,000 sf) du $146 $0 $0 $75 $160 $150 $136 Non -Residential: Light Industrial 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $236 n/a $90 $159 Office (50,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $94 n/a $49 $87 Retail (100,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $236 n/a $104 $185 Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $118 n/a $64 $114 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $0 $0 $0 $330 n/a $780 $1,387 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table III -5 (3) Calculated based on average annual growth rate of 1.4% and non -impact fee spending of approximately $252,000 per year (4) Source: Indian River County Staff recommends that affordable growth fee rates (5) Source: Indian River County; fees are currently suspended 6) Source: Brevard County Planning & Development Department 7) Source: City of North Port Economic Development Department (8) Source: City of Fort Pierce Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 33 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study IV. Public Buildings Public buildings impact fees are used to fund the land purchases and capital construction and expansion of facilities and capital equipment required to support the additional government service demand created by growth. There are several major elements associated with the development of the administrative facilities impact fee. These include: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Public Buildings Impact Cost • Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Staff Recommended Fee Rate • Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Facility Inventory The public facilities inventory includes facilities that are primarily for the provision of essential county services and do not include any of the buildings included in the calculation of other impact fees. According to information provided by Indian River County, the County has approximately 565,000 square feet of general public facility space. This includes the square footage of both primary and support buildings. Support facilities are defined as trailers, facilities without air-conditioning, or facilities that are unlikely to be occupied by personnel. Table IV -1 shows a summary of the public buildings inventory and the current value of buildings and land. As presented, the inventory includes a total of 414,000 square feet of primary bulding space and 151,000 square feet of support space. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 34 Impact Fee Update Study 0 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Building value of the facilities included in the inventory was estimated based on insurance values, estimates for future buildings, and cost information obtained from other jurisdictions. This analysis resulted in an estimate cost of $210 per square foot for primary buildings and $50 per square foot for support buildings. In addition to building value, land values were estimated for future land purchases. Land value was determined primarily through a review of the value of parcels where the current public buildings are located, as reported by the Indian River County Property Appraiser, and an analysis of vacant land sales and values of 1- to 15 -acre Tots in Indian River County. This analysis resulted in an average land value of $90,000 per acre. Additional information is included in Appendix F. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 35 Impact Fee Update Study 10 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -1 Summary of Public Buildings Facilities Inventory(1) Year Building Building Land Total Facility(1) (�) Acreage (1) (2) (3) (4) Built Square Feet Value Value Value Primary Buildings New County Admin. Building Complex 2007 177,092 5.71 $37,189,320 $513,900 $37,703,220 Health Department Building 1990 39,130 1.90 $8,217,300 $171,000 $8,388,300 Courthouse - Judicial Complex(s) 1994 116,007 2.17 $24,361,470 $195,300 $24,556,770 Administration Annex 1962 8,400 0.81 $1,764,000 $72,900 $1,836,900 Road & Bridge/Traffic Facilities Varies 18,350 11.16 $3,853,500 $1,004,400 $4,857,900 Transit Admin. Building 2012 8,171 2.86 $1,715,910 $257,400 $1,973,310 Supervisor of Elections Sub -Annex (43rd Ave) 2006 31,238 5.82 $6,559,980 $523,800 $7,083,780 Emergency Operations Center 2007 16,000 13.38 $3,360,000 $1,204,200 $4,564,200 Old Humane Society Building 1986 n a 4.77 n/a $429,300 $429,300 Subtotal -- Primary Buildings 414,388 48.58 $87,021,480 $4,372,200 $91,393,680 Support Buildings Courthouse -Judicial Complex Parking Garage 1994 135,780 1.49 $6,789,000 $134,100 $6,923,100 Fleet Management Facility 2004 15,673 3.62 $783,650 $325,800 $1,109,450 Subtotal -- Support Buildings 151,453 5.11 $7,572,650 $459,900 $8,032,550 Total -- All Buildings 565,841 53.69 $94,594,130 $4,832,100 $99,426,230 UnitCost(6) $167.17 $90,000 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Based on $210 per square foot for primary buildings and $50 per square foot for support facilities (3) Based on $90,000 per acre (4) Sum of building value (Item 2) and land value (Item 3) (5) Excludes square footage associated with Law Library, which is included as part of the inventory used in the library impact fee (6) Total building and land value divided by total building square footage and acreage, respectively. See Appendix F for further detail. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. J June 2014 36 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Service Area and Population Indian River County provides all residents, workers, and visitors the benefit of government services. As such the service area was determined to be the entire county. To be consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan, for purposes of this technical analysis, the weighted seasonal population is used in all population estimates and projections. As mentioned previously, weighted seasonal population projections used in the impact fee analysis reflect estimates provided in the Indian River County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan for seasonal residents. In addition, public buildings is one of the program areas where functional population is used to capture the presence of all people within the community, whether residents, workers, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of effective population need to be served. A more detailed explanation of weighted and functional population estimates is provided in Appendix A. Level -of -Service Based on the information provided by the County, Indian River County's 2013 achieved level -of -service (LOS) is 2.80 square feet of primary facilities per weighted resident. Table IV -2 presents the calculation of the existing LOS. In addition, the adopted LOS standard is 1.99 square feet per resident. The County's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the addition of approximately 10,000 square feet of public buildings space. With this additional investment, the LOS is estimated at 2.78 square feet per resident by 2017. Given that both the current and 2017 estimated LOS are higher than the adopted LOS standard, the impact fee calculations were based on the adopted LOS standard, resulting in more conservative impact fee levels. The adopted LOS standard is converted to square feet per functional resident, which resulted in 2.10 square feet per resident, as shown in Table IV -2. Although the LOS is measured in terms of building square feet per population for planning purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for public buildings infrastructure. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net impact cost per resident for public buildings, which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 37 Impact Fee Update Study 1'i Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -2 Current Level -of -Service Component Population(') Year Weighted Population 148,001 2013 Functional Population 140,186 Public Buildings Square Footage (Primary Buildings)I2 414,388 414,388 Achieved LOS (Sq. Ft. per Resident)(3) 2.80 2.96 Adopted LOS Standard (Sq. Ft. per Residents)l4i 1.99 2.10 Future LOS: Population -- 2017(1) 152,612 144,582 Public Buildings Square Footage (Primary Buildings)isi 424,388 424,388 Achieved LOS (Sq. Ft. per Resident)161 2.78 2.94 (1) Source: Appendix A, Tables A-1 and A-11 (2) Source: Table IV -1 (3) Total square footage (Item 2) divided by the countywide population (Item 1) (4) Source: Indian River County (5) The CIP includes the addition of 10,000 square feet of public buildings space over the next five years (6) Future public buildings square footage (Item 5) divided by the 2017 population Table IV -3 presents a comparison of IRC's LOS standard with the LOS standards of other counties. It is important to note that the public building square footage for different jurisdictions is not readily available in a format to provide an "apples -to -apples" comparison. As such, information obtained from a recent study on the LOS analysis for government buildings was used as the basis for the comparison included in Table IV -3. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 38 Impact Fee Update Study -73 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -3 Level -of -Service Comparison County Seminole Total Square Footage (1) 770,029 Primary Square Footage(1) 710,096 Permanent Populational 428,104 Sq. Ft. per Resident13l 1.66 Hernando 319,946 313,305 173,104 1.81 Palm Beach 3,431,780 2,588,451 1,335,415 1.94 Pasco 1,027,749 922,219 468,562 1.97 Manatee 829,913 763,290 330,302 2.31 Polk 1,692,402 1,416,373 606,888 2.33 Brevard 1,418,931 1,370,073 545,625 2.51 Collier 1,436,493 891,384 329,849 2.70 Osceola 969,392 807,020 280,866 2.87 Escambia 1,263,692 872,880 299,511 2.91 Indian River 565,841 414,388 139,446 2.97 Marion 1,357,640 1,045,175 332,989 3.14 Charlotte 664,786 641,994 163,357 3.93 St. Johns 773,347 771,047 196,071 3.93 (1) Source: Table IV -1 for IRC; "Collier County Government Buildings & Law Enforcement Facilities Level -of -Service Analysis, 2010" for other jurisdictions (2) Source: BEBR, 2012 final population estimates (3) Primary square footage divided by permanent population (Item 2) Cost Component The cost component of the study evaluates the cost of capital items, including buildings and land. Table IV -4 provides a summary of all capital costs, which amounts to $240 per square foot of public buildings, and $504 per functional resident. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 39 Impact Fee Update Study 7`l Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -4 Public Building Total Cost per Functional Resident Cost Component Total BuildingValuelll Figure $94,594,130 Percent of Total Value ) 95.14% Total Land Valuer�1 $4,832,100 4.86% Total Building and Land Valuei3l $99,426, 230 100.00% Primary Building Square Footage) 414,388 Total Building and Land Value per Square Foot(5) $239.94 Adopted LOS Standard - Bldg Sq Ft per Functional Resident(6) 2.10 Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(') $503.87, (1) Source: Table IV -1 (2) Source: Table IV -1 (3) Sum of building value (Item 1) and land value (Item 2) (4) Source: Table IV -1 (5) Total building and land value (Item 3) divided by primary building square footage (Item 4) (6) Source: Table IV -2 (7) Building and land value per square foot (Item 5) multiplied by building square footage per functional resident (Item 6) (8) Percentage distribution of building value and land value in relation to the combined building and land value Credit Component To avoid overcharging development for the public buildings impact fee, a review of the capital financing program for public buildings was conducted. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential revenue credits that should be considered for revenues generated by new development that could be used for capital facilities and land expansion for public buildings. To estimate an average annual non -impact fee expenditure, capital projects funded during the past five years and programmed for the next five years were reviewed. Based on this analysis, a credit for these expenditures is provided in Table IV -5, which results in an average annual credit of $5 per functional resident. It should be noted that a large part of this funding is obtained from the optional sales tax, which will expire in 2019. The credit calculations assume that the sales tax will not be re -adopted. If the sales tax is re -adopted, the credit calculations should be evaluated to determine if a revision is necessary. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 40 Impact Fee Update Study 75 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -5 Capital Expansion Project Funding per Functional Resident1�1 Description FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Total Optional Sales Tax: Expansion of Fiber Optic Network - - - - - 5359,680 5118,508 - - - $478,188 Displaced Courtroom (Additional Offices) - - - - - - 52,000,000 -- - 52,000,000 Emergency Operations Center $4,152,640 5306,586 - _ ;, _ _ - 54,459,226 Subtotal -- Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues $4,152,640 5306,586 - - - 5359,680 $2,118,508 - - - $6,937,414 Subtotal -- Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues1�1 5693,741 Average Annual Expenditures per Resident (Sales Tax)131 $4.94 Court Facility Surcharge: New Courtroom Facilities = - :a = - _ $250,000 - - 5250,000 Subtotal -- Expenditures Funded with Court Facility Surcharge Revenues 50 $o - - - - $250,000 - - - 5250,000 Subtotal -- Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Court Facility Surcharge Revenues(4) 525,000 Average Annual Expenditures per Resident (Court Facility Surcharge)1s1 50.18 Optional Sales Tax and Court Facility Surcharge: Total - Public Buildings $4,152,640 5306,586 - - - 5359,680 52,368,508 - - - $7,187,414 Total Public Buildings Expansion Expenditures per Year181 $718,741 Average Annual Functional Populationl'1 140,301 Annual Public Buildings Expansion Expenditures per Resident181 $5.12 (1) Source: Indian River County 2) Public buildings expenditures funded by the optional sales tax divided by 10 years (3) Subtotal — average annual expenditures funded with sales tax revenues (Item 2) divided by the average annual functional population (Item 7) 4) Public buildings expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues divided by 10 years (5) Subtotal — average annual expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues (Item 4) divided by the average annual functional population (Item 7) 6) Sum of the subtotal expenditures funded with sales tax revenues and the subtotal expenditures funded with court facility surcharge revenues (7) Source: Appendix A, Table A-11 (8) Total public buildings expansion expenditures per year (Item 6) divided by average annual functional population (Item 7) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County 41 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Public Buildings Impact Cost The net impact fee per functional resident is the difference between the Cost Component and the Credit Component. Table IV -6 presents the calculation of the net public buildings facilities impact cost per functional resident. The first section of Table IV -6 identifies the total impact cost as $504 per functional resident. The second section of the table identifies the capital expandion expenditure credits for the public buildings facilities impact fee. The net impact cost per functional resident (third section of the table) is the difference between the total impact cost per functional resident of $504 and the total revenue credit of $24 per functional resident. The result is a net impact cost of $480 per functional resident, which also represents the relevant LOS measure for impact fee purposes. Table IV -6 Net Public Building Impact Cost per Functional Resident Calculation Step Revenue Credits Impact Court Cost Sales Tax Facility Total Surcharge Impact Cost Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(1) $503.87 Revenue Credit Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit Amount per Functional Resident(2) $4.94 $0.18 Capitalization Rate 2.5% 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) 5 5 Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(3) $22.95 $0.84 $23.79 Net Impact Cost Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident(4) $480.08 (1) Source: Table IV -4 (2) Source: Table IV -5 (3) Average annual capital improvement credit per functional resident (Item 2) over a capitalization rate of 2.5% for 5 years for sales tax and the court facility surcharge. The estimated discount rate is provided by Indian River County. (4) Total cost per resident (Item 1) less the total credit per resident (Item 3) Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Based on the analysis conducted in this section, a public buildings impact fee schedule was developed for residential and nonresidential land uses and is illustrated in Table IV -7. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 42 Impact Fee Update Study 77 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -7 Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule ITE WC Functional Impact Land Use Resident Unit ul Coefficient RESIDENTIAL: 2009 Total Impact Percent Feel') Adopted Feel') Change1 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000sf du 1.35 5648 5183 254.1% - 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 1.45 5696 $183 280.3% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 1.54 $739 $206 258.7% - 2,500 sf or greater - du 1.72 $826 $223 270.4% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.87 $418 $121 245.5% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 0.98 $470 $149 215.4% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room _ _ 0.65 5312 5229 36.2% 320 Motel room 0.60 $288 5229 25.8% 252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 $442 $312 41.7% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 1.14 $547 $1,275 -57.1% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 1.66 $797 51,275 -37.5% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 2.23 $1,071 $1,454 -26.3% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 2.28 51,095 51,191 -8.1% 710 General Office 1,000sf 1.00 5480 $1,050 -54.3% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000sf 0.85 $408 5555 -26.5% INDUSTRIAL': 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 0.50 5240 5375 -36.0% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0.28 $134 5288 -53.5% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 0.06 $29 $40 -27.5% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000sf 0.14 $67 $288 -76.7% 110 General Ught Industrial 1,000sf 0.69 5331 5512 -35.4% n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55 $744 $1,130 -34.2% n/a Sand Mining acre 0.20 596 $145 -33.8% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 2.37 51,138 $1,531 -25.7% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 1.91 $917 $921 -0.4% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 1.47 $706 $912 -22.6% 932 Restaurant 1,GJOsf 6.78 $3,255 $3,923 -17.0% 934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 8.90 $4,273 $4,227 1.1% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 2.05 $984 51,087 -9.5% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 1.50 5720 5134 437.3% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 $418 $1,009 -58.6% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 5.83 $2,799 $2,270 23.3% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 0.23 5110 $170 -35.3% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 1.08 5518 51,307 -60.4% 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,030 sf 3.09 51,483 51,270 16.8% 412 County Park acre 0.20 596 581 18.5% 491 Tennis Court court 3.16 51,517 $1,241 22.2% 420 Marina berth 0.19 $91 $82 11.0% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000sf 1.62 $778 $1,107 -29.7% 590 Ubrary 1,000sf 1.76 $845 5919 -8.1% 571 Jail bed 1.39 $667 5466 43.1% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 0.89 $427 $755 -43.4% 610 Hospital 1,000sf 1.37 5658 $838 -21.5% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 2.54 51,219 51,223 -0.3% 560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 $245 5285 -14.0% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 52,871 $4,535 -36.7% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0.06 $29 $70 -58.6% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0.07 534 570 -51.4% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0.08 538 590 -57.8% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 548 $78 -38.5% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 0.63 5302 5339 -10.9% (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-12 for residential and lodging land uses and Table A-15 for non-residentia land uses (2) Calculated impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost per functional resident (Table IV -6) by the functional resident coefficient (Item 1) for each land use (3) Source: Indian River County; fees do not include the administrative fee; fees are curren ly suspended (4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates (Item 3) to the total impact fee (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County 43 Impact Fee Update Study Z$ Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy Based on the data shown in Table IV -5, the County will use $694,000 per year of sales tax revenues for the next five years. In addition, the County uses approximately $25,000 per year of recurring non -impact fee funding for capacity projects. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure IV - 1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum technically acceptable fee. This level is compared to investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of public buildings impact fee calculated, if the historical levels of non -impact fee funding were to be continued, the County could adopt the impact fee at approximately 90 percent for all land uses and continue to maintain the adopted LOS standard used in the calculations. If the County decides to charge the residential land uses the full calculated fee (at 100 percent), the fee adoption rate for non-residential land could be reduced to 52 percent and still maintain the adopted LOS standard. As mentioned previously, these calculations assume that the sales tax will not be re -adopted in 2019. If the sales tax is re -adopted in 2019 or another revenue source becomes available for public buildings capital projects, these calculations need to be revised. Finally, the level of discount is a policy decision and could be at any level between the minimum levels calculated in this section and 100 percent and still maintain the adopted LOS standard. 10035 80% 60% 40% 20% Figure IV -1 Public Buildings Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Approach 90% IRC Average Annual nualGrowth —Total Cost - Maximum Impact Fee - - LOS Curve 0% J 11 1 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.0096 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 44 Impact Fee Update Study 7q Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -8 Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth Affordable Impact Growth Total Impact 2009 ITE LUC Land Use Adopted Unit Adoption FeeItl Ratel3l Fee(3) RESIDENTIAL: Percent Change I41 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 100% $648 $183 254.1% - 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 100% $696 $183 280.3% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 10096 $739 $206 258.7% - 2,500 sf or greater du 10056 $826 5223 270.4% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 100% $418 $121 245.5% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 100% 5470 5149 215.4% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 52% 5162 $229 -29.3% 320 Motel room 52% 5150 $229 -34.5% 252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 52% $230 $312 -26.3% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf 52% $284 51,275 -777% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000sf 52% $414 $1,275 -67.5% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 52% 5557 51,454 -61.7% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 52% 5569 51,191 -52.256 710 General Office 1,000sf 52% 5250 51,050 -76.2% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 52% 5212 5555 -61.8% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 52% 5125 5375 -66.7% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 52% $70 $288 -75.7% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 5294 515 $40 -62.5% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000sf 52% $35 5288 -87.8% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 52% 5172 5512 -66.4% n/a Concrete Plant acre 52% $387 $1,130 -65.8% n/a Sand Mining acre 52% 550 5145 -65.5% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 52% 5592 51,531 -61.3% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 52% $477 $921 -48.256 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,O03sf 52% 5367 $912 -59.8% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 52% $1,693 53,923 -56.8% 934 Fast Food Restw/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 52% 52,222 $4,227 -47 4% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 52% 5512 $1,087 -52.9% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 52% 5374 $134 179.1% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 52% $217 51,009 -78.596 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 52% 51,455 52,270 -35.9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 52% 557 5170 -66.596 RECREATIONAL : 430 Golf Course hole 52% $269 51,307 -79.4% 492 Baguet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 5296 5771 51,270 -39.3% 412 County Park acre 52% 550 $81 -38.3% 491 Tennis Court court 52% $789 51,241 -36.4% 420 Marina berth 52% 547 582 -42.7% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000sf 52% $405 51,107 -63.4% 590 Library 1,000sf 52% $439 $919 -52.2% 571 Jail bed 52% $347 $466 -25.5% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 52% $222 $755 -70.656 610 Hospital 1,000sf 5294 $342 5838 -59.2% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 52% 5634 51,223 -48.2% 560 Church 1,000sf 52% 5127 5285 -55.4% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 52% $1,493 $4,535 -67.1% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 52% 515 570 -78.6% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 52% 518 570 -74.3% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 52% 520 $90 -77.8% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 52% $25 578 -67.9% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 52% 5157 5339 -53.7% (1) Based on annual growth rate of 1.496 and non -impact fee spending of 5719,000 per year for the next five years and 525,000 per year afterwards (2) Source: Calculated 10096 impact fee from Table IV -7 multiplied by affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County; fees do not include the administrative fee; fees are currently suspended (4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates (Item 3) to the total impact fee (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 45 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study g0 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Staff Recommendation Fee Rate Based on a review of upcoming capital needs, the County staff recommends adopting the affordable growth fee schedule with a 50 percent discount. This is a policy discount based on a review capital needs over the next several year and will be reviewed over the next three to four years, when an impact fee update study is prepared. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 46 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -9 Calculated Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule - Staff Recommended Fee Rates Impact Staff 2009 Total Impact ITE WC Land Use Recommended Adopted UnitFeeltl Feel') RESIDENTIAL: Percent Change)AdjustmentIll 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000sf du 50% $324 $183 77.0% -1,000to 1,499sf du 50% $348 $183 90.2% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 50% $370 $206 79.6% - 2,500 sf or greater du 50% $413 $223 85.2% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 50% $209 $121 72.7% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 50% $235 $149 57 7% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP (Adopted): 310 Hotel room 50% $81 $229 -64.6% 320 Motel room 50% $75 $229 -67.2% 252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 50% $115 $312 -63.1% OFFICE & FINANCIAL (Adopted ): 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf S0% 5142 51,275 -88,956 Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000sf 5056 5207 51,275 -83.8% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 50% 5279 51,454 -80.8% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 50% 5285 $1,191 -76.1% 710 General Office 1,000sf 50% 5125 51,050 -88.1% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 50% 5106 $555 -80.9% INDUSTRIAL (Adopted): 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 50% $63 $375 -83.2% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 5056 535 5288 -87.8% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 5056 58 $40 -80.0% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse* 1,000sf 50% $18 $288 -93.8% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 50% 586 $512 -83.2% n/a Concrete Plant acre STA $194 51,130 -82.8% n/a Sand Mining acre 50'% 525 $145 -82.8% RETAIL (Adopted): 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 5056 $296 $1,531 -80,756 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 50% $239 5921 -74.0% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 50% 5184 5912 -79.8% 932 Restaurant 1,00Osf 50% 5847 $3,923 -78.4% 934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 5056 51,111 $4,227 -73.7% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 50% $256 $1,087 -76.4% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 50% 5187 5134 39.6% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 50°x6 5109 $1,009 -89.2% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 50% $728 52,270 -67.9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 50% $29 5170 -82.9% RECREATIONAL (Adopted): 430 Golf Course hole 50% 5135 $1,307 -89.7% 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 50% $386 $1,270 -69.6% 412 County Park acre 50% 525 581 -69.1% 491 Tennis Court court 50% 5395 $1,241 -68.2% 420 Marina berth 50% $24 $82 -70.7% GOVERNMENTAL (Adopted): 732 Post Office 1,000sf 50% 5203 51,107 -81.7% 590 Library 1,000sf 50% $220 5919 -76.1% 571 Jail bed 5056 5174 $466 -62.7% MISCELLANEOUS (Adopted): 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf STA 5111 $755 -85.3% 610 Hospital 1,000sf 50%6 5171 $838 -79.6% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 50% 5317 51,223 -74.1% 560 Church 1,000sf 50% 564 $285 -77.5% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 50% 5747 $4,535 -83.5% 520 ElementarySchool (Private, K-5) student 50% $8 570 -88.6% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 50% $9 570 -87.1% 530 High School (Private,9-12) student 50% 510 590 -88.9% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 50% 513 578 -83.3% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 50% 579 $339 -76,756 'All Non -Residential fees have been adopted, except the High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse land use (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Source: Calculated affordable growth fee from Table IV -8 multiplied by the staff recommended adjustment (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County; fees do not include administrative fee. Fees are currently suspended. (4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates (Item 3) to the total impact fee (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 47 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 82 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's public buildings impact fee schedule, the County's calculated impact fee schedule was compared to the adopted fee schedule and those in similar or nearby jurisdictions. Table IV -10 presents this comparison. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 48 Impact Fee Update Study 93 Indian River County ( Impact Fee Update Study Table IV -10 Public Buildings Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Land Use Date of Last Update Indian River County 2009 St. Lucie Unite 12Affordable Calculated1 Stafai Adopted Count lel Growth Rate(5) 2013 2013 2013 2005 2009 Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando County(7) County(8) County(9) Countym) 2009 2010 2010 2005 Martin St. Johns Countyui) County(12) 2012 2011 Adoption Percentage 100% n/a n/a 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1 tiMillrlea 11 1 Single Family (2,000 sf) du $739 $739 $370 $206 $336 $404 $264 $766 $466 $646 $565 1 I1 11 Light lndustrial 1,000sf $331 $172 $86 $512 $68 $140 $60 $271 $168 $182 $210 Office (50,000sgft) 1,000sf $480 $250 $125 $1,050 $297 $254 $151 $558 $335 $316 $600 Retail (100,000sgft) 1,000sf $1,138 $592 $296 $1,531 $504 $391 $305 $966 $651 $551 $1,158 Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $1,095 $569 $285 $1,191 $504 $551 $305 $895 $651 $554 $456 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $4,273 $2,222 $1,111 $4,227 $504 $1,575 $305 $3,539 $1,012 $2,482 $1,015 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table IV -7 (3) Source: Table IV -8 (4) Source: Table IV -9; Indian River County Staff recommends charging 50 percent of the affordable growth fee rates (5) Source: Indian River County; fees are currently suspended (6) Source: St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing (7) Source: Charlotte County Planning & Land Development Department. In Charlotte, bank w/drive-thru is charged "per lane" Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended (8) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department (9) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing (10) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department (11) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department (12) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 49 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study V. Libraries Library impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of library services related buildings, land, and materials/equipment required to support the additional library facilities demand created by new growth. This section provides the results of the library impact fee analysis. There are several major elements associated with the development of the library facilities impact fee: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Library Facilities Impact Cost • Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Staff Recommended Fee Rate • Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison These various elements are summarized in this section. It should be noted that library impact fees are charged to residential land uses only. Facility Inventory The IRC Library Service operates five libraries with a total square footage of 110,000. The following table presents the inventory of library facilities. The building value is estimated at $240 per square foot based on recent library construction and insurance values of existing libraries. Land value for library buildings is estimated at $50,000 per acre based on value of current parcels and an analysis of recent vacant land sales and values. Appendix F provides additional information on building and land value estimates. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 50 Impact Fee Update Study 35 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-1 Library Land & Building Inventory Facility Description Main Library Address 1600 21st Street, Vero Beach, FL32960 Year Built (1( 1991 Acres(Z) 4.180 Square (3 Footage 49,286 Land Value (off $209,000 Building Value (5� $11,828,640 Total Building and Land Value (6) $12,037,640 North County Library 1001 CR 512, Sebastian, FL 32958 1993 4.115 25,445 $205,750 $6,106,800 $6,312,550 Law Library 2000 16th Avenue, Vero Beach, FL32960 1994 n/a 3,993 n/a $958,320 $958,320 Gifford Youth Activities Center Library 4875 43rd Avenue, Vero Beach, FL32967 n/a n/a 1,513 n/a $363,120 $363,120 Brackett Library 6155 College Lane, Vero Beach, FL 32966 2009 n/a 30,000 n/a $7,200,000 $7,200,000 Total 8.295 110,237 $414,750 $26,456,880 $26,871,630 Land Value perAcre(7 $50,000 Building Value per Square Foot(8) $240 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Source: Indian River County; Land associated with Law, Gifford Youth Activities Center and Brackett Libraries are not included because they are either not owned by the County or are accounted for in another impact fee program area (3) Source: Indian River County (4) Acres (Item 2) multiplied by the land value per acre (Item 7) (5) Square footage (Item 3) multiplied by building value per square foot (Item 8) (6) Sum of land value (Item 4) and building value (Item 5) (7) Based on a review of vacant land sales and values. See Appendix F for additional detail. (8) Based on recent construction, insurance values, and other available materials. See Appendix F for additional detail. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 51 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study The five facilities identified in Table V-1 house a wide variety of materials available to the public. Table V-2 presents the inventory of library materials. Table V-2 Library Material Inventory Description Units(1) Unit Costl11 Total Value(�) Books: Gifford Youth Activities Center Library 9,724 $25 $243,100 Law Library 225 $80 $18,000 Main, North, Brackett Libraries: - All Books 443,181 $53 $23,488,593 - Electronic Resources 28,812 $100 $2,881,200 - Electronic Books 1,525 $100 $152,500 - Serials 14,027 $75 $1,052,025 - Books on Tape/CD 15,023 $75 $1,126,725 Total - Books 512,517 $28,962,143 Online Resources: Online Resource Subscriptions 68 $4,094 $278,392 Other Library Items: Music CDs 16,200 $15 $243,000 DVDs 24,798 $20 $495,960 Videos 4,386 $15 $65,790 Print Subscriptions 1,775 $39 $69,225 Other Print Materials 24,775 $50 $1,238,750 Total - Other Library Items 71,934 $2,112,725 Total - All Library Materials 584,519 $31,353,260 Total Value per Item(3) $54 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Number of units multiplied by the cost (3) Total value for all library materials divided by the total units for all library materials In addition to the available material, the IRC Library System owns a variety of equipment, both for public use and for its own operations. Table V-3 presents the inventory of equipment for public versus operational use. It should be noted that impact fee standards are based on the equipment for public use, excluding the equipment used by the library staff. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 52 Impact Fee Update Study 87 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-3 Library Equipment Inventory Equipment Copiers Number Public 6, ofltemsili Staff 4 Total 10 Unit Cost(1) Cost $7,000 Total Equipment Value(2) $70,000 Book Scribe Copier 1 0 1 $16,500 $16,500 Laser Printers 10 6 16 $2,136 $34,176 Computers 121 74 195 $900 $175,500 Large Print Readers 1 0 1 $5,000 $5,000 30" TV 1 0 1 $800 $800 45" TVs 1 0 1 $2,000 $2,000 52" TVs 1 0 1 $2,356 $2,356 42" TVs 1 0 1 $1,527 $1,527 46" TVs 1 0 1 $2,205 $2,205 32" TVs 3 0 3 $2,428 $7,284 Dollar Changer 1 0 1 $2,955 $2,955 Laminator 1 1 $1,265 $1,265 Camcorder 1 0 1 $800 $800 LCD Projectors 5 0 5 $2,500 $12,500 Total - All Items 154 85 239 $334,868 Total - All (excluding computers) 33 11 44 $159,368 (1) Source: Indian River County 2) Number of items multiplied by the unit cost Service Area and Population Library services are provided on a countywide basis and the impact fee is charged only to residential land uses. As such, consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan, countywide weighted seasonal population is used in the calculation. The County's current population estimates and future population projections are provided in Appendix A, Table A-1. Level -of -Service The following table provides a summary of the current LOS as well as the adopted LOS standard for library buildings, books, other library materials, and computers in Indian River County. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 53 Impact Fee Update Study 88 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Although the LOS is measured in terms of buildings, materials and equipment per population for planning purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for library infrastructure. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net impact cost per resident for libraries, which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes. Table V-4 Level -of -Service (2013) Item Library Buildings (sf) Library Materials (items) Computers(s) Other Library Equipment (items)(s) Sq. Footage/ Count(1) 110,237 584,519 121 33 Population(2) 148,001 148,001 148,001 148,001 LOS (per 1,000 Residents)(3) 745 3,949 0.8 0.2 Adopted LOS Standard (per 1,000 Residents)(4) 580 3,200 0.7 0.2 (1) Source: Table V-1 for buildings, Table V-2 for materials, and Table V-3 for computers and equipment (2) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1 (3) Square footage/count (Item 1) divided by population (Item 2) multiplied by 1,000 (4) Source: Indian River County (5) Source: Table V-3; only computers and equipment available for public use are included As presented in the table, the County's current LOS is above the adopted LOS standard for all elements, except for other library equipment. For impact fee calculations, the adopted LOS standard is used in order to ensure new development is not overcharged. In addition, a review of the CIP indicated that there are no capital expansion projects programmed for the next five years. As such, the existing LOS is likely to decrease somewhat, which suggests that it is preferable to use the adopted LOS standard to provide a more conservative approach. A comparison of the current Indian River County LOS, the adopted LOS standard, LOS of the other Florida counties, and the suggested State standards is presented in Table V-5. The comparison includes counties with a population of 100,000 to 750,000, and is based on the information obtained from the Library Directory with Statistics, published by the Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services. It should be noted that the current LOS figures included in the table for Indian River County represent figures provided by the Division of Library and Information Services and reflect FY 2013 data with Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 54 Impact Fee Update Study Sq Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study the use of permanent population. To be able to provide an "apples -to -apples" comparison, 2013 data is used for Indian River County and its peer group. Table V-5 Comparison of IRC Current LOS to Florida Standards Item Library Buildings (sq. ft.) Library Materials(3) Computers IRC Achieved LOS (per 1,000 Residents)(1) 745 3,949 0.8 IRC LOS Standard (per 1,000 Residents)(1) 580 3,200 0.70 FL Public Library Standards(2) Essential Enhanced Exemplary 600 2,000 0.30 700 3,000 0.50 1,000 4,000 1.00 (1) Source: Table V-4 (2) Source: Standards for Florida Public Libraries, 2004; Updated April 2013 (3) Library materials include books, online resources, subscriptions, and other library items IRC's adopted LOS standard for buildings does not meet the Florida Library Association's (FLA) essential standards. However, the County's adopted standard for library materials and computers and achieved LOS for all other areas are between the enhanced and exemplary LOS standards established by the State. The following table provides a comparison of the current IRC LOS to those of surrounding counties. IRC's LOS is higher than surrounding counties in all areas, except for computers. In terms of computers, IRC ranks second after Brevard County. Table V-6 Comparison of IRC Current LOS to Surrounding Counties (per 1,000 residents) Item Library Buildings (sq. ft.) Library Materials(�) Computers(2) Indian River (Existing)131 745 3,949 0.8 Per 1,000 Residents Brevard Osceola Okeechobee St. Lucie 700 2,662 1.0 337 1,011 0.5 388 2,256 0.4 317 1,146 0.4 Avg. of Peer Avg. of Other Groupl4l FLCountiesisl 422 1,898 0.7 500 2,074 0.8 (1) Library materials for IRC include books, CDs, DVDs, videos, print, and online resource subscriptions. Library materials for other counties include books, serial subscriptions, and Audio/video volumes (2) Source: Department of State — Division of Library & Information Services, 2009/10 Library Directory with Statistics; Includes public computers only (3) Source: Table V-4 (4) Peer group includes jurisdictions with 100,000 to 750,000 service area population (excluding IRC) (5) Includes all jurisdictions in Florida (excluding IRC) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 55 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component Costs are calculated separately for facilities and items/equipment. Facility costs are based on the estimated cost to add the next library building, and the cost of library items and equipment is based on the estimated current value per unit. Buildings and Land Table V-7 summarizes the calculation of library facility and land values. The total impact cost or total value per resident for library buildings and land in Indian River County is $141. Table V-7 Building and Land Cost per Resident Element Total Building Value (1) Figure $26,456,880 Total Land Value1�1 $414,750 Total Building and Land Value(3) $26,871,630 Bui Idi ng Square Footagei4l 110,237 Total Building and Land Cost per Square Foot(5) $243.76 Adopted LOS Standard (sf per 1,000 residents)161 580 Total Building and Land Cost per Resident(') $141.38 (1) Source: Table V-1 (2) Source: Table V-1 (3) Sum of building value (Item 1) and land value (item 2) (4) Source: Table V-1 (5) Building and land value (Item 3) divided by building square footage (Item 4) (6) Source: Table V-4 (7) Total building and land value per square foot (Item 5) multiplied by the adopted LOSS (Item 6) divided by 1,000 Library Materials and Equipment The following table provides a summary of library materials and equipment costs per resident, which amounts to $175. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 56 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-8 Library Materials and Equipment Cost per Resident Element Library Materials Value per Items�1 Figure $54 Adopted LOS Standard for Materials per Resident(2) 3.20 Library Materials Value per Resident(3) $172.80 Computers - Unit Valuel4i $1,450 Adopted LOS Standard for Computers per Residentlsl 0.0007 Computer Value per Resident(6) $1.02 Other Library Equipment Value per Item(7) $4,829 Adopted LOS Standard for Other Library Equipment per Resident(8) 0.0002 Other Library Equipment Value per Resident(9) $0.97 Total Materials and Equipment Cost per Resident(10) $174.79 (1) Source: Table V-2 2) Source: Table V-4 3) Library materials value per item (Item 1) multiplied by the adopted LOS standard for materials per resident (Item 2) (4) Source: Table V-3; Total value divided by the number of items available for public use (5) Source: Table V-4 (6) Unit value of computers (Item 4) multiplied by the adopted LOS standard for computers per resident (Item 5) (7) Source: Table V-3; Total value divided by the number of items available for public use (8) Source: Table V-4 (9) Other library equipment cost (Item 7) multiplied by the adopted LOS standard for other library equipment per resident (Item 8) (10) Sum of library materials, computer, and other library equipment costs per resident (Items 3, 6, and 9) Credit Component To avoid overcharging new development, a review of funding for library capital expansion projects over the past five years and those programmed for the next five years was completed. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential revenues generated by new development, other than impact fees, that are being used or will be used to fund the expansion of capital facilities, land, and materials for the County's libraries program. This review suggests that historically the County used primarily State grants to fund a portion of capacity expansion over the past five years and has no capacity projects included in the CIP. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 57 Impact Fee Update Study CO— Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Capital Improvement Credit Table V-9 summarizes the library related capital expansion projects that are funded by state grants. The table includes recent expenditures for the years 2008 through 2017. The average annual capital expansion expenditure during this five-year period is $0.34 per resident. This figure is calculated by dividing the average annual total capital expenditure amount for the ten-year period by the County's average population during the same time period. Table V-9 Historical Library Capital Expansion Funding Sources Fiscal Year Construction of Brackett Library: State Library Grant(1) FY 2008 $0 FY 2009 $300,000 FY 2010 $200,000 FY 2011- FY 2017 Total $500,000 Average Annual Capacity Expansion Expenditures1�1 $50,000 Average Annual Population(3) $148,070 Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(4) $0.34 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Average expenditure per year (3) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1 (4) Average annual capacity expansion expenditures (Item 2) divided by the average annual population (Item 3) Net Library Facilities Impact Cost The net impact fee per residence is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table V-10 summarizes the calculation of the net library impact cost per resident, which reflects the relevant LOS for impact fee calculation purposes. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 58 Impact Fee Update Study q3 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-10 Net Library Facilities Impact Cost Impact Revenue Calculation Step Cost Credits Impact Cost Building and Land Cost per Resident (1) $141.38 Library Materials Cost per Resident (2) $172.80 Library Equipment Cost per Resident (3) $1.99 Total Impact Cost (4) $316.17 Revenue Credit Average Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(5) $0.34 Capitalization Rate 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) 25 Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(6) $6.26 Net Impact Cost Net Impact Cost per Resident (7) I $309.91 (1) Source: Table V-7 (2) Source: Table V-8 3) Source: Table V-8 (4) The sum of building, land, materials, and equipment costs (Items 1, 2, and 3) (5) Source: Table V-9 (6) Source: The present value of the capital improvement credit per functional resident (Item 2) at a discount rate of 2.5% with a capitalization period of 25 years. The discount rate was provided by Indian River County. (7) Total impact cost per resident (Item 4) less total credit per resident (Item 5) Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule The calculated library impact fee for each residential land use is presented in Table V-11. The net impact cost per resident calculated in the previous section is applied to the average persons per unit by land use. The resulting total impact fees per dwelling unit range from $381 for the multi -family residential land use to $781 for single family land use with 2,500 square feet or more space. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 59 Impact Fee Update Study g -1 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-11 Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Residents Net Cost per Impact 2009 Percent Residential Land Use (1) (z) (3) (4) (5) per Unit Resident Fee Adopted Fee Change Residential Single Family (less than 1,000sf) 1.97 $309.91 $611 $430 42.1% Single Family (1,000 to 1,499sf) 2.12 $309.91 $657 $430 52.8% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499sf) 2.26 $309.91 $700 $483 44.9% Single Family (2,500 sf or greater) 2.52 $309.91 $524 49.0% Multi-Family/Accessory Unit 1.28 $309.91 $397 $285 39.3% Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) 1.44 $309.91 $446 $349 27.8% (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-2 (2) Source: Table V-10 (3) Residents per unit (Item 1) multiplied by net cost per resident (Item 2) (4) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown do not include the administrative fee. (5) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 4) to the total impact fee (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 60 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy Based on the data shown in Table V-9, the County uses approximately $50,000 per year of non -impact fee funding for library capacity projects. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure V-1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum impact fee calculated above. This level is considered the investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Given that the available non -impact fee funding for library capital facilities is very limited, the County needs most of the impact fee (approximately 95 percent) to maintain the adopted LOS standards used to calculate the impact fee. In addition, library impact fees are charged only to residential land uses and the County's primary focus at this time is to provide some impact fee relief to non- residential land uses. 120% -_ 100% - 80%-107 - 0 60% t- 40% - 20% 0% Figure V-1 Library Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Approach 95% IRC Average Annual Growth - Total Cost —Maximum Impact Fee - LOS Curve 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% S.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 61 Impact Fee Update Study 44 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table V-12 Calculated Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule — Affordable Growth Residential Land Use Affordable Growth Adoption Rate(' Total 2009 Impact Adopted Fee(2) Fee(3) Percent Change(4) Residential Single Family (less than 1,000sf) 96% $587 $430 36.5% Single Family (less than 1,500sf) 96% $631 $430 46.7% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499 sf) 96% $672 $483 39.1% Single Family (2,500sf or greater) 96% $750 $524 43.1% Multi-Family/Accessory Unit 96% $381 $285 33.7% Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) 96% $428 $349 22.6% (1) Calculated based on the average annual growth rate of 1.4% and non -impact fee funding of $50,000 per year. (2) Source: Calculated impact fee from Table V-11 multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown do not include the administrative fee. (4) Percent change from the current adopted fee (Item 2) to the total impact fee (Item 1) Staff Recommended Fee Rate Based on a review of capital needs in the near future, the County staff recommends suspension of library impact fees until the next technical update study. At that time, the capital expansion needs for libraries will be reviewed and the suspension may need to be lifted. Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's library impact fee program, a comparison of library facilities impact fee schedules was completed for other Florida counties. Table V-13 presents this comparison. As presented, Indian River County's calculated fee is higher than fees adopted by other Counties, which reflects the high investment levels to the County's library facilities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 62 Impact Fee Update Study q7 trirrrImm ( Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Table V-13 Library Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Land Use Date of Last Update Adoption Percentage Unitm Calculated(2) 2013 100% Indian River County Affordable Growth(3) 2013 n/a Single Family (2,000 sf) Multi-Family/Accessory Unit Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) du 1,000 sf 1,000 sf $700 $397 $446 $672 $381 $428 5taff191 2013 n/a 2009 Brevard St. Lucie Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Highlands Martin Adopted County(6) County'1 County(8) County191 County101 County111 County" County(13) Rate(s) 2005 100% 2000 2009 2009 2010 2010 2005 2006 2012 so so so $483 $285 $349 29% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% $64 $217 $142 $238 $315 $107 $245 $527 $38 $140 $96 $179 $160 $81 $170 $527 $46 $170 $101 $228 $237 $107 $139 $527 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table V-11 (3) Source: Table V-12 (4) Indian River County Staff recommends suspension of the library facilities impact fee based on a review of upcoming capital needs. (5) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown do not include the administrative fee (6) Source: Brevard County Planning & development Department (7) Source: St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department; Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing (8) Source: Charlotte County Planning & Land Development Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended (9) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department (10) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department; Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing (11) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department (12) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28; Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30, 2014 (13) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 63 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study VI. Emergency Services This section provides the results of the emergency services impact fee analysis. There are several major elements associated with the development of the emergency services impact fee: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Calculation • Net Emergency Services Impact Cost • Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Staff Recommended Fee Rate • Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison These various elements are summarized in the remainder of this section with the result being the calculated emergency services impact fee schedule. Facility Inventory Table VI -1 presents the building and land inventory for Indian River County. Indian River County currently has a total of 12 fire/EMS stations. In addition, the County has a training tower and owns the land where Station 13 will be built. Table VI -1 summarizes the County's emergency services land and building inventory. The value of buildings and land are based on recent construction, insurance and land values of the existing facilities, vacant land sales and values of parcels with similar characteristics, and information obtained from other jurisdictions. A more detailed explanation of building and land value estimates is included in Appendix F. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 64 Impact Fee Update Study co Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -1 FacilityNumber Description Fire Station 15 Land Location(1) 1500 Old Dixie Hwy, Vero Beach, FL32960 & Buuldings Year Acquired/ Built(l) 1986 Inventory of Acres(l) n/a Square Feet(l) 10,418 Building Value(2) $2,708,680 Land Value(3) n/a Total Building and Land Value(4) $2,708,680 Fire Station 2 3301 Bridge Plaza Dr, Vero Beach, FL32963 2007 0.92 8,436 $2,193,360 $55,200 $2,248,560 Fire Station 3 2900 43rd Ave, Vero Beach, FL 32960 2007 2.72 9,275 $2,411,500 $163,200 $2,574,700 Fire Station 4 1500 9th St SW, Vero Beach, FL 32962 2007 2.18 7,440 $1,934,400 $130,800 $2,065,200 Fire Station 5 65800ld Dixie Hwy, Vero Beach, FL32967 2007 2.44 7,533 $1,958,580 $146,400 $2,104,980 Fire Station 6 101 South A1A, Vero Beach, FL 32963 1986 2.20 3,080 $800,800 $132,000 $932,800 Fire Station 7 1215 82nd Ave, Vero Beach, FL 32966 1986 0.50 3,136 $815,360 $30,000 $845,360 Fire Station 8 1115 Barber St, Sebastian, FL32958 1999 1.00 6,243 $1,623,180 $60,000 $1,683,180 Fire Station 9 1640 US 1, Sebastian, FL 32958 2009 7.05 7,386 $1,920,360 $423,000 $2,343,360 Fire Station 10 62 North Broadway, Fellsmere, FL32948 1996 0.48 5,520 $1,435,200 $28,800 $1,464,000 Fire Station 11 2555 93rd St, Vero Beach, FL 32963 2001 1.51 6,976 $1,813,760 $90,600 $1,904,360 Fire Station 12 362049th St, Vero Beach, FL32967 2009 4.00 7,386 $1,920,360 $240,000 $2,160,360 TrainingTower(6) 422543rd Avenue, Vero Beach, FL32967 2008 n/a 2,604 $390,600 n/a $390,600 Planned Station 13 44404th St, Vero Beach, FL32968 FY08/09 3.21 pip. n a $192,600 $192,600 Total 28.21 85,433 $21,926,140 $1,692,600 $23,618,740 Building Value per Square Foot(7) $257 Land Value perAcrei8l $60,000 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Source: Indian River County Building square footage multiplied by $260 for primary buildings and $150 for Training Tower based on recent construction, insurance values, information from other jurisdictions, and discussions with architects/contractors. Appendix F provides further detail. Number of acres multiplied by land value per acre (Item 8) Sum of building value (Item 2) and land value (Item 3) The County does not own, but leases the land for Station 1. As such, it is not included in the inventory Land associated with the building is included in the inventory of public buildings, as part of the Emergency Operations Center. Total building value (Item 2) divided by square footage Land value is estimated at $60,000 per acre based on recent sales, vacant land values of parcels with similar size and/or location. See Appendix F for additional detail. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County 65 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In addition to land and buildings, the IRC emergency services inventory includes the necessary vehicles and equipment required to perform its services. As presented in Table VI -2, the total vehicle cost is approximately $15 million. Table VI -2 Vehicle Inventory and Values Description Ladder Truck Units(1) 2 Unit Cost(1) $800,000' Total Value(2) $1,600,000 Brush Truck 8 $193,000 $1,544,000 Dive Rescue Unit 1 $130,000 $130,000 3,000GallonTankerTruck 1 $150,000 $150,000 Hazardous Materials Vehicle 1 $150,000 $150,000 Marine Fire Boat 1 $100,000 $100,000 Rigid Hull Inflatable Boat 1 $20,000 $20,000 Fire Engine 16 $465,000 $7,440,000 Ambulance 17 $225,000 $3,825,000 Total $14,959,000 1) Source: Indian River County (2) Units multiplied by unit cost Table VI -3 presents the equipment inventory and related costs for Indian River County. Table VI -3 Equipment Inventory and Values Description(1) Turnout Gear Units per Station 15 Total Units (12Stations) (2) 180 Unit (1) Cost $2,150 Total (3) Value $387,000 Lifepack 2 24 $32,000 $768,000 Radio (portable) 5 60 $4,000 $240,000 Radio (vehicle) 4 48 $4,000 $192,000 Stretcher 1 12 $13,000 $156,000 Thermal Imager 1 12 $9,800 $117,600 MSA, Airbag 5 60 $10,885 $653,100 Spreader, Ocutter, K12 1 12 $24,339 $292,068 Suction Unit 1 12 $1,000 $12,000 Total $2,817,768 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Units per station multiplied by 12 (number of stations in Indian River County) (3) Unit cost multiplied by total units Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County 66 Impact Fee Update Study 101 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Service Area and Population Emergency services are provided by the County in the unincorporated areas and most municipalities. The Town of Indian River Shores, however, maintains its own fire department. Therefore, the proper benefit district for emergency services is the entire county excluding the Town of Indian River Shores. For impact fee calculations, the current 2013 countywide functional population estimate, excluding Indian River Shores, is used, which is provided in Appendix A, Table A-11. Because simply using weighted population does not fully address all of the benefactors of emergency service, the "functional" weekly 24-hour population approach is used to establish a common unit of demand across different land uses (See Appendix A for further information). Level -of -Service Typically, level of service for emergency services is expressed in terms of stations per 1,000 residents for capital facility planning purposes. Using this method, IRC's current level of service (LOS) is 1 station per 11,963 residents or 0.084 stations per 1,000 residents. The County's adopted LOS standard is 0.089 stations per 1,000 residents. Since the achieved LOS is lower than the adopted LOS standard, the achieved LOS is used in the impact fee calculations. As mentioned in the previous sections, LOS needs to be measured using functional population to capture all residents, workers, and visitors that benefit from emergency services. In terms of functional population, LOS is calculated at 0.088 stations per 1,000 functional residents. Table VI -4 summarizes the calculation of the LOS standard using the 2013 population and functional population. The County has plans to add two stations over the next five years. This would result in a LOS of 0.095 stations per 1,000 residents. However, since this LOS is not yet achieved, the existing LOS is used in the impact fee calculations. Although the LOS is measured in terms of stations per population for planning purposes and in terms of response time for operational purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for emergency services infrastructure. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net impact cost Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 67 Impact Fee Update Study (0 2 Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study per resident for emergency services, which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes. Table VI -4 Level -of -Service (2013) Calculation Step Population(1) Year 2013 Weighted Functional Population Population 143,561 136,323 Number of Stations(�) 12 12 Population perStation(3) 11,963 11,360 LOS (Stations per 1,000 Residents)(4) 0.084 0.088 Adopted LOSS (Stations per 1,000 Residents)(s) 0.089 0.093 Future LOS: Population -- 2017(�1 148,034 140,598 Future Number of Stations(6) 14 14 Future Population perStation(7) 10,574 10,043 Future LOS (Stations per 1,000 Residents)($) 0.095 0.100 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Source: Appendix A, Table A-11. Figures exclude population of Indian River Shores. Source: Table VI -1 Population (Item 1) divided by the number of stations (Item 2) Number of stations (Item 2) divided by the population (Item 1) divided by 1,000 Source: Indian River County Source: Indian River County Capital Improvement Plan 2017 population divided by the future number of stations (Item 6) Future number of stations (Item 7) divided by the 2017 population multiplied by 1,000 Table VI -5 compares the levels of service for other Florida counties as well as the state of Florida. The LOS is displayed in terms of permanent population for 2012 for the service area of all entities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 68 Impact Fee Update Study 1 03 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -5 Level -of -Service Comparison Jurisdiction Okeechobee County Service Area Population (2012)11 39,805 Number of Stations(2) 2 Residents per Station l3l 19,903 LOS (Stations) per 1,000 Residents)(4) 0.050 St. Lucie County 280,355 17 16,491 0.061 Hernando County 173,104 14 12,365 0.081 Osceola County 180,821 16 11,301 0.088 Indian River County 135,510 12 11,293 0.089 Collier County 293,343 28 10,477 0.095 Citrus County 132,285 13 10,176 0.098 St. Johns County 176,128 18 9,785 0.102 Charlotte County 146,373 17 8,610 0.116 Martin County 128,332 15 8,555 0.117 Brevard County 205,690 31 6,635 0.151 Highlands County 98,955 21 4,712 0.212 1) Source: BEBR, 2012 final population estimates 2) Source: County websites and the U.S. Fire Administration, National Fire Department Census 3) Service area population (Item 1) divided by number of stations (Item 2) (4) Number of stations (Item 2) divided by the service area population (Item 1) divided by 1,000 Cost Component Table VI -6 summarizes the total current value of land, buildings, and equipment for emergency services, including: • Twelve stations with a total asset value of $23.6 million for buildings and land and $17.8 million for vehicles and equipment, for a total asset value of $41.4 million; and • An average value of $3.5 million per station. In addition, Table VI -6 presents the total impact cost per functional resident for emergency services in Indian River County, which is calculated by multiplying the net asset value per station by the LOS (stations per 1,000 functional residents) and dividing that figure by 1,000. The total impact cost for emergency services provided by the County is $304 per functional resident. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 69 Impact Fee Update Study 104 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -6 i otai impact Description Building Value(1) Lost Figure $21,926,140 Percent of Total Value(9) 52.97% Land Value(2) $1,692,600 4.09% Vehicle Value(3) $14,959,000 36.14% Equipment Valuel4l $2,817,768 6.81% Total Asset Value $41,395,508 100.01% Number of Stations(5) 12 Cost per Station(6) $3,449,626 LOSI7I 0.088 Total Impact Cost per Resident(8) $303.57, 1) Source: Table VI -1 (2) Source: Table VI -1 (3) Source: Table VI -2 4) Source: Table VI -3 (5) Source: Table VI -1 (6) Total asset value divided by the number of stations (Item 5) (7) Source: Table VI -4 (8) Cost per station (Item 6) multiplied by the LOS (Item 7) divided by 1,000 (9) Distribution of building, land, vehicle, and equipment values Credit Component To avoid overcharging new development for the emergency services impact fee, a review of the capital financing program for emergency services was completed. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential revenue credits generated by new development that are being used for expansion of capital facilities, land, vehicles, and equipment included in the inventory. It should be noted that the credit component does not include any capital renovation, maintenance, or operations expenses, as these types of expenditures cannot be funded with impact fee revenue. Capital Expansion Expenditure Credit To calculate the capital expansion expenditure credit per functional resident, the historical capital expansion projects and those programmed in the CIP are reviewed. During the time period from 2008 through 2017, the County allocated an average annual non -impact fee funding of $757,000 toward emergency services capital facilities. The annual capital expansion expenditures were divided by the average functional residents for the same Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 70 Impact Fee Update Study 105 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study period in order to calculate the average capital expansion cost per functional resident. Although the County used some sales tax revenues toward emergency services capacity projects, because this amount was insignificant (less than 1 percent of non -impact fee spending), a separate credit for sales tax revenues was not calculated. As presented in Table VI -7, the result is an average annual expansion cost of $5.55 per functional resident. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 71 Impact Fee Update Study 104 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -7 Capacity Expansion Projects Expenditure(1) FY 2007/08 Emergency Services District Fund FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Total Fiber Optics $13,097 - - - - - - - - - $13,097 EOCTrainingCenter $610,801 - - - - - - - - - $610,801 Fire Station 12 $40,231 $1,980,929 $59,514 - - - - - - - $2,080,674 Fire Station 13 - - - - - $426,304 $426,304 - - - $852,608 Fire Station 14 - - - - - - - 5200,000 $1,600,000 - 51,800,000 Med Unit - - - - - 5225,000 - $225,000 - - $450,000 Fire Pumper - - - - - - 5457,000 - $457,000 - $914,000 One Quint (Fire Apparatus) - - - - - - - - $800,000 - $800,000 Optional Sales Tax Revenues Fire Station 12 $47,209 - - - - - - - - - $47,209 Emergency Services District Fund and Optional Sales Tax Revenues Total Capital Expansion Expenditures $711,338] $1,980,929 $59,514 - - $651,304 $883,304 $425,000 $2,857,000 - $7,568,389 Average Annual Capital Expansion Expenditures(2) $756,839 Average Functional Population(3) 136,435 Capital Expansion Expenditures per Functional Resident(4) $5.55 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Total capital expansion expenditures divided by 10 (3) Source: Appendix A, Table A-11 (4) Average annual capital expansion expenditures (Item 2) divided by average functional population (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 72 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Emergency Services Impact Cost The net impact fee per functional resident is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table VI -8 summarizes the calculation of the net emergency services impact cost per functional resident. The first section of this table identifies the total impact cost as $304 per functional resident. The second section of the table identifies the revenue credits for the emergency services impact fee totaling approximately $102 per functional resident which is equal to the net present value of the capital expansion credit per functional resident. The net impact cost per functional resident is the difference between the total impact cost and the total revenue credit. This results in a net impact cost of $201 per functional resident, which reflects the relevant LOS for emergency services. Table VI -8 Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident Revenue Impact Cost / Credit Element Impact Cost Credits Impact Cost Total Impact Cost per Functional Resident(�) $303.57 Revenue Credit Avg Annual Capital Improvement Credit per Functional Resident(z) $5.55 Capitalization Rate 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) 25 Capital Improvement Credit per Resident(3) $102.26 Net Impact Cost Net Impact Cost per Functional Resident(4) I $201.31 (1) Source: Table VI -6 (2) Source: Table VI -7 (3) Average annual capital improvement credit per functional resident (Item 2) over a capitalization rate of 2.5% for 25 years. The capitalization rate estimate is provided by Indian River County. (4) Total impact cost per functional resident (Item 1) Tess the total revenue credit per functional resident (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 73 Impact Fee Update Study log Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Table VI -9 presents the calculated emergency services impact fee schedule developed for Indian River County for both residential and non-residential land uses, based on the, net impact cost per functional resident previously presented in Table VI -8. The table. also includes a comparison to the 2009 adopted fees. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 74 Impact Fee Update Study 109 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -9 Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC Functional 2009 Impact Total Impact Percent Land Use Resident,, Unit Ill Fee (2) (3) Change) Coefficient Fee RESIDENTIAL: 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 1.36 5274 $247 10.9% -1,000 to 1,499 sf du 1.47 5296 5247 19.8% -1,500 to 2,499 sf du 1.56 5314 5278 12.956 - 2,500 sf or greater du 1.73 $348 5301 15.6% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.90 5181 5176 2.8% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 0.98 5197 5182 8.2% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP (Adopted): 310 Hotel room 0.65 5131 5160 -18.1% 320 Motel room 0.60 $121 5160 -24.4% 252/260 JAssisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 51.85 5172 7.6% OFFICE & FINANCIAL (Adopted): 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 1.14 $229 5299 -23.4% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 1.66 5334 $299 11.7% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 2.23 $449 5341 31.7% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 2.28 $459 5280 63.9% 710 General Office 1,000sf 1.00 5201 5246 -18.3% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 0.85 5171 5130 31.5% INDUSTRIAL (Adopted): 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 0.50 5101 $88 14.8% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0.28 $56 568 -17.656 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 0.06 512 $13 -77556 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse` 1,000sf 0.14 528 $68 -58.8% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 0.69 $139 5120 15.8% n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55 $312 $265 17.7% n/a Sand Mining acre 0.20 $40 534 17.6% RETAIL (Adopted): 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 2.37 $477 $503 -5.2% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 1.91 $385 5303 27.1% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 1.47 $296 5300 -1.3% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 6.78 51,365 51,289 5.9% 934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 8.90 51,792 51,389 29.0% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 2.05 5413 5357 15.7% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 1.50 $302 5107 182.2% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 5175 5332 -47.3% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 5.83 $1,174 $746 57 4% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 0.23 $46 $56 -17.9% RECREATIONAL (Adopted): 430 Golf Course hole 1.08 $217 5429 -49.4% 492 RaquetClub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 3.09 5622 $417 49.2% 412 County Park acre 0.20 540 527 48.1% 491 Tennis Court court 3.16 $636 5408 55.9% 420 Marina berth 0.19 $38 527 40.7% GOVERNMENTAL (Adopted): 732 Post Office 1,000 sf 1.62 $326 5312 4.5% 590 Library 1,0000 1.76 $354 5302 17.2% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf 1.39 5280 5238 17.6% 571 Jail bed 0.87 5175 5153 14.4% MISCELLANEOUS (Adopted): 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 0.89 5179 5177 1.1% 610 Hospital 1,000sf 1.37 $276 5275 0.4% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 2.54 5511 $287 78.0°% 560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 5103 594 9.6% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 51,204 51,490 -19.2% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0.06 512 517 -29.4% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0.07 $14 517 -17.6% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0.08 $16 $21 -23.8% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0.10 $20 $18 11.1% 'All Non -Residential fees have been adopted, except the High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse land use (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-14 for residential land uses and A-15 for non-residential land u es (2) Source: Net impact cost per resident from Table VI -8 multiplied by the functional resident coefficient (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee. (4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted fee (Item 3) to the total impact fee (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 75 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study (10 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy In the case of emergency services, based on a review of capital expansion expenditures between 2008 and 2017, the County uses approximately $757,000 per year of non -impact fee funding. During the next 25 years, the County is expected to grow at an annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure VI -1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum calculated impact fee. This level is compared investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of emergency services impact fee calculated, only approximately 8 percent of this amount is needed to maintain the current/achieved LOS due to non -impact fee contributions from the existing development and low rate of population growth. If the impact fee is adopted at a level higher than 8 percent, the LOS is likely to improve as long as the County continues to spend approximately $757,000 of non -impact fee revenues per year toward capacity projects. In addition, if the County would like to charge no fee to non-residential land uses, it can do so and still maintain the existing LOS as long as the fee for residential land uses is adopted at 11 percent. 16096 — 140% 120% — '100% 80% 6096 40% 20% 0% Figure VI -1 Emergency Services Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Approach 8% —Total Cost —Maximum Impact Fee —LOS Curve 0.0096 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.0096 5.00% 6.00% 7.0096 8.00% 9.00% 10.0056 Annual Growth Rate Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 76 Impact Fee Update Study I( 1 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -10 Calculated Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule — Affordable Growth ITE LUC Affordable Impact Growth Total 2009 Percent Land Use Impact Adopted Unit Adoption Fe e(2) Fee,,, Change(4) Rate(1) RESIDENTIAL: 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000sf du 11% 530 $247 -87.9% -1,000 to 1,499 sf du 11% 533 $247 -86.6% -1,500to2,499sf du 11% $35 $278 -874% - 2,500 sf or greater du 11% 538 5301 -874% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 11% $20 5176 -88.6% 240 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 11% $22 5182 -87.9% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 0% 50 5160 -100.0% 320 Motel room 0% 50 5160 -100.0% 252/260 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0% 50 5172 -100.0% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 0% 50 $299 -100.0% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 0% 50 $299 -100.0% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 0% 50 $341 -100.056 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 0°% 50 $280 -100.0% 710 General Office 1,000sf 0% 50 5246 -100.0% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 0% 50 5130 -100.056 INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 0% 50 $88 -100.0% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0% 50 568 -100.0% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 056 $0 513 -100.0% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000sf 0% $0 $68 -100.0% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 0% 50 5120 -100.0% n/a Concrete Plant acre 0% $0 $265 -100.0°% n/a Sand Mining acre 056 50 534 -100.056 RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,00asfgla 0% 50 $503 -100.056 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 0'x6 50 $303 -100.056 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 0% 50 5300 -100.0% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 0% $0 51,289 -100.0% 934 Fast Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 0% $0 $1,389 -100.0% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 0% 50 5357 -100.0% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 0% 50 5107 -100.0% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 056 50 $332 -100.0% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 0% 50 $746 -100.0% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 0% 50 556 -100.0°x6 RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 0% 50 $429 -100.0% 492 412 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio _ _ 1,003 sf 0% 50 5417 -100.0% County Park acre 056 50 $27 -100.056 491 Tennis Court court 0% 50 5408 -100.0% 420 Marina berth 0% 50 $27 -100.0% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000sf 0% 50 5312 -100.0% 590 Library 1,000sf 0% $0 5302 -100.0% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf 0°x6 50 $238 -100.0% 571 Jail bed 0% 50 $153 -100.0% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 0% 50 $177 -100.0% 610 Hospital 1,003 sf 0% 50 5275 -100.0°% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 0% 50 $287 -100.0% 560 Church 1,000sf 0% 50 594 -100.0% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 056 $0 51,490 -100.0% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0% 50 517 -100.0% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 0% $0 517 -100.056 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0% 50 $21 -100.0% 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 0% 50 518 -100.0% (1) Based on annual growth rate of 1.4% and non -impact fee spending of $757 000 per year (2) Source: Calculated 100% Impact fee from Table V)-9 multiplied by affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County; fees do not include administrative fee (4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates (Item 3) to the total impact fee (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 77 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 112 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Staff Recommended Fee Rate In the case of emergency services, the County staff recommends adopting the full calculated fee to fund the needed capital projects in this area and be able to allocate a larger portion of the ad valorem dollars for operational expenses. Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's emergency services impact fee program, a comparison of impact fee schedules was completed for other Florida counties. Table VI -11 presents this comparison. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 78 Impact Fee Update Study 11 3 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VI -11 Emergency Services Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Land Use Date of Last Update Indian River County Unitl'I Affordable 2009 Brevard Okeechobee Calculatedl'l13) Steil') Adopted County("Countyl'l Growth Feel's 2013 2013 2013 2005 2000 2012 St. Lucie Osceola Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Highlands Martin Countya) County" County County"County)"l County(13) County"Countyl'sl 2009 2006 2009 2010 2010 2005 2006 2012 St. Johns County's) 2011 Adoption Percentage 100% n/a n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1;f4iJ71 Vt7R 11 11 1 Sin:le Family (2,000 sf) du $35 $314 $278 $93 $394 $557 $165 $183 $393 $94 $759 $690 Otmrta 11 11 1 Light Industrial 1,000sf $139 $011 $120 n/a $74 $50 $63 a7.10EI $84 $331 $12 $18 Office (50,000 s. ft) 1,000sf $201 $0 $201 $246 $44 $191 $329 $90 $115 $226 $95 $171 $800 $80 $216 Retail (100,000s•ft) 1,000sf $477 $0 $477 $503 $207 $408 $517 $300 $176 $455 $165 $334 $1,121 $319 $125 Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $459 $0 $459 $280 $105 $408 $517 $300 $250 $455 $153 $328 $1,136 $80 $49 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $1,792 $0 $1,792 $1,389 $552 $408 $517 $1,390 $715 $455 $603 $510 $4,317 $575 $109 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table Vl-9 (3) Source: Table VI -10 (4) Source: Table Vl-9; Indian River County Staff recommends the full calculated fee rates (5) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown do not include the administrative fee (6) Source: Brevard County Planning & Development Department; Fire/Rescue and EMS rates are combined; Industrial land used are exempt from impact fees (7) Source: Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners Administration Department (8) Source: St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department; Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing (9) Source: Osceola County Community Development Department (10) Source: Charlotte County Planning & Land Development Department. In Charlotte, bank w/drive-thru is charged "per lane" Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended (11) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department (12) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department; EMS rates only; Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing (13) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department; Fire and EMS rates are combined (14) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28; Fire/Rescue and EMS rates are combined; Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30, 2014 (15) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department (16) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department; Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 79 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study VII. Law Enforcement Law enforcement impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of police service related land, facilities and capital equipment required to support the additional law enforcement service demand created by new growth. This section of the report presents the results of the law enforcement impact fee update study for Indian River County and will serve as the technical support document for the calculated law enforcement impact fee schedule. There are several major elements associated with the development of the law enforcement impact fee. These include: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost • Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Staff Recommended Fee Rate • Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Facility Inventory According to information provided by the IRC Sheriff's Office (IRCSO) and the County, Indian River County has 68,000 square feet of building space and almost 13 acres of land associated with law enforcement services. Table VII -1 presents this information. Building value is estimated based on recent construction, insurance values of existing buildings, and information from other Florida jurisdictions. Land value is based on the value of parcels where existing buildings are located and an analysis of vacant land sales and values. Additional information is provided in Appendix F. It should be noted that, in addition to these buildings, IRCSO leases several buildings to accommodate substations and storage facilities. For the purposes of this impact fee study, the inventory includes only the space owned by the County. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 80 Impact Fee Update Study Il$' Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -1 Land and Building Inventory Year Total Square Total Building Number of Square Allocated Building Land Facility Description Acquired/ Footage on and Land (1) Acres" ) Feet(l) Acreage (3) Value(4) Value (51 (6) Built (1) Value Primary Buildings: Sheriff's Administration Building 1988 81 33,332 47,552 6.88 $6,666,400 $344,000 $7,010,400 Sheriff's Fleet Compound 19889 9,856 2.03 $1,971,200 $101,500 $2,072,700 General Services Building N/A 2,100 0.43 $420,000 $21,500 $441,500 Sheriffs Crime Scene Evidence Addition 2003 1,000 0.21 $200,000 $10,500 $210,500 Courthouse Security N/AN/AI7I 587 122,501 N/A $117,400 N/A $117,400 Courthouse Civil Process N/A 1,914 N/A $382,800 N/A $382,800 SunSky Office Space 2011 2.75 4,920 18,146 0.75 $984,000 $37,500 $1,021,500 Crime Scene Building 2013 13,226 2.00 $2,645,200 $100,000 $2,745,200 Miscellaneous Support Buildings On -Site: Base N/A9 81 264 47,552 0.05 $13,200 $2,500 $15,700 Storage Bldg/Maintenance Shed N/A 1,000 0.21 $50,000 $10,500 $60,500 Total 68,199 12.56 $13,450,200 $628,000 $14,078,200 Building Value per Square Foot(8) $197 Land Value perAcrel9l $50,000 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Represents square footage of all buildings on the associated acreage (whether law enforcement -related or not) (3) Number of acres divided by the total square footage on-site, multiplied by square footage (4) Calculated based on $200 per square foot for primary buildings and $50 per square foot for support buildings (5) Allocated acreage (Item 3) multiplied by land value per acre (Item 9) (6) Sum of building and land values (Items 4 and 5) (7) Acreage included in the public buildings impact fee calculations (8) Total building value divided by total square footage (9) Estimated based on value of current parcels, a review of recent sales and vacant land values of parcels with similar size and location Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County 81 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In addition to the land and buildings inventory, the IRCSO also has the vehicles and equipment to perform its law enforcement duties. Table IV -2 summarizes the equipment and vehicle inventory. Table VII -2 Equipment and Vehicle Inventory Equipment Vehicles Units(1) 281 Unit Value (2) $13,347 Total Value(1) $3,750,435 Vehicle/Radio Equipment 1,577 $1,523 $2,401,999 Weapons 450 $535 $240,733 Office Equipment 1 $148,292 $148,292 Specialty Vehicles/Equipment 2 $65,266 $130,532 Electronic Equipment 1 $196,760 $196,760 Computer Equipment 1 $1,604,426 $1,604,426 Misc. Equipment 1 $890,490 $890,490 911 Center Equipment 76 $7,723 $586,930 Total Equipment Value $9,950,597 1) Source: Indian River County (2) Calculated by dividing the total value by number of units Service Area and Population Law enforcement services are provided by the IRCSO in the unincorporated areas of the County. Municipalities within IRC have their own police departments. Therefore, the proper benefit district for law enforcement is the unincorporated county and weighted seasonal population for unincorporated county is used in the impact fee calculations. In addition, because law enforcement services are provided to all land uses and all residents, visitors, and workers, the "functional" population for unincorporated county is calculated and used as well. Appendix A provides further information on population estimates. Level -of -Service Based on the information provided by the County, the Indian River County's 2013 level -of - service is 1.89 law enforcement officers per 1,000 weighted residents. The County's adopted LOS standard is 2.09 officers per 1,000 residents. Table VII -3 presents this information. Given that the achieved LOS is lower than the adopted LOS standard and new Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 82 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study development cannot be charged for a higher LOS than what is being provided, the achieved LOS is used in the impact fee calculations. The County does not have any new law enforcement capital facilities programmed in the Five -Year CIP; however, the Sheriff's Master Plan identifies needs for additional administrative space and a crime scene investigation unit. The estimated cost for this project is $25 million to $30 million. Due to lack of funding, this project is not yet programmed. Since the timing of this project is not known yet, a future LOS estimate is not calculated. While the 2013 LOS is 1.89 officers per 1,000 weighted residents, in order to calculate the law enforcement facilities impact fee, the LOS needs to be calculated in terms of officers per 1,000 functional residents. Table VII -3 also illustrates the calculation of the current LOS using the total functional residents within the service area. The current LOS of law enforcement facilities is 2.11 officers per 1,000 functional residents. Table VII -3 Level -of -Service (2013) Component Population') Number of Officers(2) LOS (officers per 1,000 residents)(3) Adopted LOS Standard (officers per 1,000 residents)l4i Year 2013 Weighted Population 97,681 185 1.89 2.09 Functional Population 87,590 185 2.11 2.33 (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1 for weighted population and Table A-11 for functional population; Unincorporated population (2) Source: Indian River County Sheriff's Office (3) Number of officer (Item 2) divided by the population (Item 1) multiplied by 1,000 (4) Source: Indian River County Table VII -4 summarizes a LOS comparison between Indian River County and other Florida counties. The LOS is displayed in terms of permanent population for all jurisdictions because a functional population analysis has not been completed for these entities. The LOS comparison is based on the permanent population for 2012, as this is the most recent population data available for all jurisdictions. As presented in this table, the Indian River County's LOS is on the high end of these other communities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 83 Impact Fee Update Study 118 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -4 Level -of -Service Comparison Jurisdiction Collier County Service Area Population (2012)11) 293,744 Number of Officers(1) 270 LOS (Officers per 1,000 Residents)(2) 0.92 St. Johns County 176,721 219 1.24 Highlands County 77,041 99 1.29 Charlotte County 146,373 189 1.29 Citrus County 140,761 181 1.29 Hernando County 165,402 216 1.31 Okeechobee County 34,227 47 1.37 Martin County 128,656 183 1.42 St. Lucie County 71,457 137 1.92 Osceola County 180,821 358 1.98 Indian River County (Existing) 92,795 185 1.99 Brevard County 223,781 474 2.12 1) Source: Indian River County and Florida Department of Law Enforcement Criminal Justice Agency Profile Report, 2012 (2) Permanent population (Item 1) divided by the number of officers (Item 2) divided by 1,000 Finally, although the LOS is measured in terms of officers per population for planning purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for law enforcement infrastructure. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net impact cost per resident for law enforcement capital facilities, which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes. Cost Component The cost component of the study evaluates the cost of capital items, including buildings, land, vehicles, and equipment. Table VII -5 provides a summary of all capital costs, which amounts to approximately $130,000 per sworn law enforcement officer. Table VII -5 also presents the cost per functional resident for the impact fee analysis. This cost was calculated as the total capital cost of approximately $130,000 per officer multiplied by the LOS of 2.11 officers per 1,000 functional residents divided by 1,000. As shown in the following table, the total impact cost per resident is approximately $274 for law enforcement facilities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 84 Impact Fee Update Study i 1 9 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -5 Unit Cost per Functional Resident Component BuildingValue(1) Cost $13,450,200 Percent of Total Value(9) 55.98% Land Value(2) $628,000 2.61% Vehicle and Equipment Value(3) $9,950,597 41.41% Total Asset Value() $24,028,797 100.00% Number of Officers(5) 185 Total Asset Value per Officer(6) $129,885 Level -of -Service (Officers/1,000 Functional Residents)(') 2.11 Cost per Functional Resident(8) $274.06 (1) Source: Table VII -1 (2) Source: Table VII -1 (3) Source: Table VII -2 (4) Sum of building value (Item 1), land value (Item 2), and vehicle/equipment value (Item 3) (5) Source: Table VII -3 (6) Total asset value (Item 4) divided by number of officers (Item 5) (7) Source: Table VII -3 (8) Total asset value per officer (Item 6) multiplied by the LOS (Item 7) divided by 1,000 (9) Distribution of building, land, vehicle and equipment values Credit Component A review of historical expenditures as well as projects programmed in the Five -Year CIP suggested that there were no non -impact fee funding used toward capacity projects between 2008 and 2017. As such, a credit for non -impact fee funding is not needed. Net Law Enforcement Impact Cost Given that there is no credit, net law enforcement impact cost is $274 per resident, as shown previously in Table VII -5, which is also the relevant LOS measure for impact fee calculation purposes. Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule A law enforcement impact fee schedule was developed for residential and non-residential land uses and is illustrated in Table VII -6. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 85 Impact Fee Update Study 120 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -6 Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC Functional 2009 Impact Total Impact Percent Land Use Resident Adopted Unit (t) Fee(2) Fee 131 Change(4) Coefficient RESIDENTIAL - 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 1.39 5381 5218 74.8% -1,000to 1,499 sf du 1.50 $411 5218 88.5% -1,500 to 2,499 sf du 1.59 $436 $245 78.0% - 2,500 sf or greater du 1.77 $485 $265 83.0% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 0.91 $249 5148 68.2% 240 Mobile Home / RV (Tied Down) du 0.89 $244 $158 54.4% TRANSIENT,'ASSISTED, GROUP (Adopted):. 310 Hotel room 0.65 5178 $140 27.1% 320 Motel room 0.60 $164 $140 17.1% 252/620 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF)/Nursing Home bed 0.92 $252 $151 66.95i r OFFICE& FINANCIAL (Adopted): 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf 1.14 $312 $262 19.1% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000sf 1.66 5455 $262 73.7% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 2.23 5611 $299 104.3% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 2.28 $625 $245 155.1% 710 General Office 1,000sf 1.00 5274 5216 26.9% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 0.85 $233 $114 104.4% INDUSTRIAL (Adopted): 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 0.50 $137 $77 77.9% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 0.28 $77 $59 30.5% 151 Mini-Warehouse/Storage 1,000sf 0.06 $16 512 33.3% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse' 1,000sf 0.14 $38 $59 -35.6% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 0.69 $189 5105 80.0% n/a Concrete Plant acre 1.55 $425 $232 83.2% n/a Sand Mining acre 0.20 $55 $30 83.396 i RETAIL (Adopted): 820 Retail 1,000gsf 2.37 5650 .$441 47.4% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 1.91 $523 $265 974% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 1.47 $403 5263 53.2% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 6.78 $1,858 51,129 64.6% 934 Fast Food Rest w/ Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 8.90 $2,439 $1,217 100.4% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 2.05 $562 5313 79.6% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 1.50 $411 $114 260.5% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 0.87 5238 $291 -18.2% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf 5.83 $1,598 5653 144.7% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 0.23 $63 $49 28.6% P RECREATIONAL (Adopted): . 430 Golf Course hole 1.08 5296 $376 -21.3% 492 RaquetClub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 3.09 5847 $366 131.4% 412 County Park acre 0.20 $55 $23 139.1% 491 Tennis Court court 3.16 $866 $357 142.6% 420 Marina berth 0.19 $52 $24 116.7% i GOVERNMENTAL (Adopted): 732 Post Office 1,000sf 1.62 $444 $273 62.6% 590 Ubrary 1,000sf 1.76 $482 $265 81.9% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf 1.39 $381 5209 82.3% 571 Jail bed 0.87 $238 5134 77.6% ( MISCELLANEOUS (Adopted): 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 0.89 $244 $155 57 4% 610 Hospital 1,000sf 1.37 $375 $241 55.6% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 2.54 $696 $251 177.3% 560 Church 1,000sf 0.51 $140 $82 70.7% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 5.98 $1,639 51,305 25.6% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 0.06 $16 $14 14.3% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student . 0.07 $19 $14 35.7% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 0.08 $22 $18 22.2% 540/550 University/Junior Col le e with 7,500 or fewer students student , 0.10 $27 516 68.8% n/a Fire Station 1,000sf 0.63 $173 $97 78.4% Note: gsf = gross square feet *All Non -Residential fees have been adopted, except the High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse land use (1) Source: Functional resident coefficients from Appendix A, Table A-13 for residential and lodging land uses and Table A-15 for non-residential land uses (2) Calculated impact fee determined by multiplying the net impact cost per functional resident (Table VII -5) by the functional resident coefficient (Item 1) for each land use (3) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee. (4) Percent change from the 2009 adopted rates (Item 3) to the total impact fee (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 86 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 121 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy Currently, it appears that the only funding source available for law enforcement capital facilities is the impact fee. As such, unless another revenue source is identified, any reduction in the impact fee will result in a decline in the LOS. In addition, the current achieved LOS is lower than the adopted LOS standard. As mentioned previously, the Sheriff's Master Plan identifies two projects that are estimated to cost approximately $25 million to $35 million. These projects are not yet programmed due to lack of funding. Given these, the policy decision should focus on the LOS and whether the adopted and/or existing LOS should be reduced or impact fees and/or other revenue sources should be used to maintain/improve the LOS. Staff Recommended Fee Rate The County staff recommends adopting the full calculated impact fee for law enforcement services. Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's law enforcement impact fee schedule, the County's calculated impact fee schedule was compared to the adopted fee schedule and those in similar or nearby jurisdictions. Table VII -7 presents this comparison. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 87 Impact Fee Update Study 122 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VII -7 Calculated Law Enforcement Impact Fee Schedule Land Use Unit111 Indian River County Calculatedlt) Staff(3) 2009 St. Lucie Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Highlands Martin St. Johns Adopted County's) Countylb) County") Countyla) County County1D) County" County12' Rate'') Date of Last Update 2013 2013 2005 2009 2009 2010 2010 2005 2006 2012 2011 Adoption Percentage I I 100% n/a I 100% 100% 100' 5054 10055 100.4 10056 10034 100°6 I I I I I I I Residentia/:.:�e is ai!". . :,'tet::::•.�Yi,,;4 v"«e r fK" :�"'�' ri ':i�'s}?i''d r .'f',.;, �t�"L`�^`=i1Pi+�.�' :, s ; l'',1,,';`.1'''''. �,.� ..t r - N J .. _, ,-:n:::;t, Single Family (2,000 sf) du 5436 $436 5245 52061583 52901 54491 5861 52301 57601 $84 Non-Resldentlol: °M; `. ,. , . -,.. '"r w 1 d _ ._.. `'fi t `.' *": - . , '- Light Industrial 1,000 sf 5189 5189 5105 548 529 566 5149 $31 n/a 5158 $30 Office (50,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf 5274 5274 5216 5317 552 5166 5307 562 n/a 5274 589 Retail (100,000 sq ft) 1,000 sf 5650 5650 5441 $351 581 5335 5531 5121 n/a 5742 5171 Bank w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 5625 5625 5245 5305 5113 5335 $492 5121 n/a 5481 567 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $2,439 52,439 51,217 $305 5324 $335 $1,946 5187 n/a 52,757 5150 (1) du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table VII -6 (3) Source: Table VII -6; Indian River County Staff recommends the full calculated fee rates (4) Source: Indian River County. Fees shown do not Include the administrative fee (5) Source: St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department. Fees have been Increased to above rates through annual indexing (6) Source: Charlotte County Planning & Land Development Department. In Charlotte, bank w/drive-thru is charged "per lane" Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended (7) Citrus County Planning & Development Department (8) Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department; Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing (9) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department (10) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28; Impact fee moratorium in effect through June 30, 2014 (11) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department (12) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 88 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study VIII. Parks & Recreation Facilities This section discusses the analysis used in the development of the parks and recreation impact fee. To develop the proposed parks and recreation impact fee schedule, multiple elements must be addressed, including: • Inventory of Land and Recreation Facilities • Service Area and Population • Level -of -Service • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Cost • Calculated Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Staff Recommended Fee Rate • Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison These various elements are summarized throughout this section, with the result being the proposed parks and recreation impact fee schedule. Inventory of Land and Recreation Facilities According to information provided by IRC, the County owns 29 parks located in the unincorporated county. In addition, there are five parks where the land is not owned by the County, but the facilities are. As such, only the facilities in these parks are included in the inventory. Parks that are owned by the County, but located in cities are excluded since the impact fee is collected only in the unincorporated county. Finally, recreation facilities that generate revenue (such as golf courses and the shooting range) are also excluded from the inventory. IRC parks and recreational facilities can be classified into three different types, depending on the population and areas they serve and types of amenities offered. The Recreation and Open Space Element of the County's 2030 Comprehensive Plan includes definitions of each park type. Table VIII -1 provides the parks and recreation inventory used as the basis for the impact fee. It is important to note that IRC conducted a detailed GIS analysis to ensure that only the useable park upland acreage is included in the inventory, excluding wetlands, habitat land, etc. This approach results in conservative impact fee levels. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 89 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VIII -1 Indian River County Parks & Recreation Facilities Inventory Name of the Park/Facility 450 Street Dock Total Acreage 1.00 Ownership County Class R Basketball Court Boat Ramp Canoe Launch Community Center Dune Walkover FishinJg Pier 1 Jogging Trails (miles) Lifeguard Li Tower Maintenance Facility Multi -Purpose Buildinglsf) Olympic AquaticRestrooms Center Picnic Pavilion Play- ground Soccer field Softball Field Swimming Pool Tennis Courts Volleyball Court Ambersand Beach Park 0.30 County R 1 Blue Cypress Lake Park 10.00 County R 2 1 1 1 Boat Island 5.00 FIND° 9 4 1 C-54 Stick Marsh Recreation Area 4.56 SJRWMDIr1 R 4 11 2 CR -512 Recreation Area 6.00 SJRWMD151 R 2 1 2 1 Dale Wimbrow Park 27.25 County R 1 0.50 3 1 1 Donald MacDonald Park 27.25 County R 1 1 0.50 2,500 1 1 Gifford Park 38.96 County R 2 6,006 1.00 1,400 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 Golden Sands Park 14.30 County R 1 1 4 1 1 Grove nor Estates Park 4.65 County N Helen Hanson Park 2.00 County N 1 1 1 Hosie -Schumann Park 2.00 County N 1 1 IRC Fairgrounds 137.92 County R 0.25 70,000 3 1 IRC Parks Maintenance Facility N/A County R 8,850 IRC Shooting Range 80.00 State R 1,500 1 Joe 5. Earman Park 1.00 County R 1 2 Klwanis-Hobart Park 71.43 County R 1 1.00 7 3 2 2 MLK Park 5.84 County N 1 North County Regional Park 155.00 State R 0.50 400 1 1 1 4 Oslo Road Boat Ramp 0.30 County R 1 Pine Hill (Lone Pine) 0.50 County 9 1 1 Roseland Community Center 2.00 County 9 1,401 1 1 1 Round Island Beach Park 9.36 County R 1 0.25 1 6 1 1 Round Island Park West 17.00 County R 2 1 1 0.25 1 1 1 Sebastian Canoe Launch Park 1.03 County C 1 1 South County Regional Park 72.70 County R 2 L00 800 10 1 3 4 4 2 1 Tracking Station Beach 5.50 County R 1 1 1 Treasure Shores Park (North Beach Complex) 17.00 County R 1 0.25 1 1 1 Wabasso Beach Park 1.00 County R 2 1 2 1 Wabasso Causeway Park 5.00 County R 3 2 2 7 1 Wabasso Island River Park 54.00 County R 2 1 1 3 1 Wabasso School Park 7.36 County N 1 1 West Wabasso Park 10.00 County N 2 1.00 3 1 1 1 1 Total (County Owned) 10 18 5 7407 7 i5 6.50 5 8,850 76,600 1 59 13 32 6 14 1 5 4 Summary of Parks & Recreation Facilities Total Acreage Basketball Court Boat Ramp Canoe Launch Community Center Dune Walkover Fishing Pier Jogging Trails (miles) Lifeguard Tower Maintenance Facility Multi -Purpose Building(sf) Olympic Aquatic Aquatic Center Picnic Pavillon Play- ground Soccer Field Softball Field Swimming Pool Tennis Courts Volleyball Court Neighborhood Parks 34.35 5 0 0 1,401 0 1 1.0 0 0 0 0 4 5 4 0 2 0 1 1 Community Parks 1.03 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Regional Parks 511.27 5 18 4 6,006 7 14 5.5 5 8,850 76,600 1 54 8 28 6 12 1 4 3 TOTAL 546.65 10 18 5 7,407 7 15 6.50 5 8,850 76,600 1 59 13 32 6 14 1 5 4 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Florida Inland Navigation District (3) St. John's River Water Management District Red text indicates that the acreage was not included in the total acreage summary since itis not owned by the County Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 90 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Service Area and Population IRC provides parks and recreation facilities and services in the unincorporated areas of the county. The municipalities provide these facilities and services within their respective jurisdictions. As a result, the parks and recreation impact fee analysis will consider only unincorporated county area population and parks and recreational facilities located within the unincorporated county area. Appendix A, Table A-1, provides the estimated unincorporated area population for 2013 and the projected unincorporated area population through 2040. Parks impact fees are charged only to residential land uses. As such, the weighted seasonal population per housing unit is used to measure demand from each residential land use, which is presented in Appendix A, Table A-3. Level -of -Service The current LOS for all county -owned and maintained neighborhood, community and regional parks in unincorporated county is 5.59 acres per 1,000 residents. Table VIII -2 presents the calculation of the current LOS for each park type included in the inventory, as well as Indian River County's adopted LOS standard of 6.61 acres per 1,000 residents. The impact fee cannot charge new growth at a rate to correct existing deficiencies. In addition, there needs to be a commitment to continue providing the LOS used in the impact fee calculation, which is typically achieved through the adopted LOS standard. For impact fee calculation purposes, this study used the lower of the two figures to provide a conservative approach. With this approach, the current achieved LOS is used in the calculation of the parks and recreation impact fee. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 91 Impact Fee Update Study 124 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VIII -2 Current Level -of -Service (2013) Calculation Step 2013 Unincorporated Population(1) Figure 97,681 Current Regional Parks Number of Acres(2) 511.27 Current Regional Parks LOS Component (Acres per 1,000 Residents)(3) 5.23 Current Neighborhood Parks Number of Acres(2) 34.35 Current Community Parks Number of Acres(2) 1.03 Total Number of Acres (Neighborhood and Community)(4) 35.38 Current Neighborhood & Community Parks LOS Component (Acres per 1,000 Residents)(5) 0.36 Current Total Parks LOS (Acres per 1,000 Residents)(6) 5.59 Adopted Total Parks LOS Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents)(') 6.61 (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1; Unincorporated County (2) Source: Table VIII -1 (3) Current regional parks number of acres (Item 2) divided by the unincorporated population (Item 1), multiplied by 1,000 residents. (4) Sum of current neighborhood parks number of acres and current community parks number of acres. (5) Current neighborhood/community parks number of acres (Item 4) divided by the unincorporated population (Item 1), multiplied by 1,000 residents. (6) Sum of current regional parks LOS (Item 3) and current neighborhood/community parks LOS (Item 5). (7) Source: Indian River County Table VIII -3 presents a comparison of the parks and recreation adopted LOS standards of other Florida counties to Indian River County's adopted LOS standards. Based on this comparison, Indian River County's adopted LOS standards are in the range of the required acreage per 1,000 residents in other communities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 92 Impact Fee Update Study 117 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VIII -3 Level -of -Service Comparison Jurisdiction Brevard County(2) LOS Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents)(1) 3.00 Martin County(3) 3.00 Collier County(4) 3.90 Hernando County(5) 4.00 Citrus County(6) 4.50 Okeechobee Countyl'I 5.50 Indian River County (Existing)($) 5.59 Indian River County (Adopted)(9) 6.61 St. Lucie Countyl10l 7.50 Charlotte County())) 10.00 Highlands Countyl12l 10.00 Osceola County(13) 10.00 St. Johns County(14) 28.00 Average (excluding IRC) 8.13 (1) Adopted LOS standards provided only include community regional, and other similar types of parks and exclude local parks (2) Source: Brevard County Comprehensive Plan (3) Source: Martin County FY 2013 Capital Improvement Program (4) Source: Collier County 2013 AUIR (5) Source: Hernando County Comprehensive Plan (6) Source: Citrus County Comprehensive Plan (7) Source: Okeechobee County Parks & Recreation Master Plan (8) Source: Table VIII -2 (9) Source: Indian River County 2030 Comprehensive Plan (10) Source: St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan (11) Source: Smart Charlotte 2050 Comprehensive Plan (12) Source: Highlands County 2030 Comprehensive Plan (13) Source: Osceola County Comprehensive Plan (14) Source: St. Johns County 2025 Comprehensive Plan Although the LOS is measured in terms of acres per population for planning purposes, for impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by the County for park land and facilities. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net impact cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities, which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 93 Impact Fee Update Study 122 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component The total cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities consists of two components: the cost of purchasing and developing land for each park and the cost of facilities and equipment located at each park. Land Cost Because of recent fluctuations in land values statewide, a detailed analysis of land values for each type of park (and the geographic subareas within the county) was conducted. This analysis takes into consideration current land value of the existing parks as reported by the Indian River County Property Appraiser as well as an analysis of recent sales of vacant land similar in size and location to Indian River County's parks. Based on this analysis, an average land value of $50,000 per acre is used in the impact fee calculations. Appendix F provides the data used for this analysis. The cost of land for parks and recreation facilities includes more than just the purchase cost of the land. Landscaping/site improvement and utilities/paving costs are also considered. These costs can vary greatly, depending on the type of services offered at each park. Based on information provided by the County, as well as information from similarly sized jurisdictions and park types, basic landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs were estimated and are presented in Table VIII -4. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 94 Impact Fee Update Study OA Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VIII -4 Land Cost per Resident Facility/Calculation Step Land Purchase Cost per Acrel�1 Cost per Acre $50,000 Landscaping, Site Preparation, and Irrigation Costs (per acre)IZI $5,000 Utilities and Paving (per acre)i3i $20,000 Total Land Cost per Acrei4i $75,000 Regional Parks LOS (acres per 1,000 Residents)1s1 5.23 Land Cost per Resident - Regional Park Component(6) $392.25 Neighborhood/Community Parks LOS (acres per 1,000 Residents)Is1 0.36 Land Cost per Resident - Neighborhood/Community Park Component(7) $27.00 Land Cost per Resident - All Parks(8) $419.25 (1) Source: Appendix F, Table F-10 2) Source: Indian River County 3) Source: Indian River County 4) Sum of land purchase cost (Item 1), landscaping, site preparation, and irrigation costs (Item 2), an d utilities and paving per acre cost (Item 3) (5) Source: Table VIII -2 (6) Total land cost per acre (Item 4) multiplied by regional parks LOS, divided by 1,000 (7) Total land cost per acre (Item 4) multiplied by neighborhood/community parks LOS, divided by 1,000 (8) Sum of land cost per resident for regional parks (Item 6) and neighborhood/community parks (Item 7) Facility and Equipment Cost The second step in calculating the total cost for parks and recreation services in Indian River County involves estimating the current value of recreational facilities. When available, the value for the parks facilities and equipment is estimated based on recent bids or purchases made by the County for its park facilities. When recent bid/purchase information was not available, unit costs from the County's insurance reports and recent costs for similar facilities from other jurisdictions were used. As presented in Table VIII -5, the total park facility value is $3.3 million for neighborhood and community parks and $40.7 million for regional parks, for a combined total of $44 million, including facilities, equipment, and architecture and engineering (A&E) costs. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 95 Impact Fee Update Study 130 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table VIII -5 Facility(1) Description Basketball Court Recreational Unit court (2) Unit Value $55,000 Facility Neighborhood/ Community Count(3) 5 Asset Value Parks Total Value) $275,000 Regional Countm 5 Parks Total Value(6) $275,000 Total Cost 5550,000 Boat Ramp ramp lane $100,000 0 $0 18 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 Canoe Launch launch $188,000 1 $188,000 4 $752,000 $940,000 Community Center sq ft $180 1,401 $252,180 6,006 $1,081,080 $1,333,260 Dune Walkover walkover $43,000 0 $0 7 $301,000 $301,000 Fishing Pier pier $12,500 1 $12,500 14 $175,000 $187,500 Jogging Trails mile $150,000 1.0 $150,000 5.5 $825,000 $975,000 Lifeguard Tower tower $25,000 0 $0 5 $125,000 $125,000 Maintenance Facility sq ft $100 0 $0 8,850 $885,000 $885,000 Multi -Purpose Bldg sq ft $150 0 $0 76,600 $11,490,000 $11,490,000 Olympic Aquatic Center center $3,000,000 0 50 1 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Picnic Pavilion pavilion $40,000 5 $200,000 54 $2,160,000 $2,360,000 Playground playground $90,000 5 $450,000 8 $720,000 $1,170,000 Restroom restroom $85,000 4 $340,000 28 $2,380,000 $2,720,000 Soccer Field field $325,000 0 $0 6 $1,950,000 $1,950,000 Softball Field field $500,000 2 $1,000,000 12 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 Swimming Pool pool $2,000,000 0 $0 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Tennis Courts court $50,000 1 $50,000 4 $200,000 $250,000 Volleyball Court court $20,000 1 $20,000 3 $60,000 580,000 Facilities and Equipment Value $2,937,680 $36,179,080 $39,116,760 Architecture, Engineering, and Inspection @ 12.5%181 $367,210 $4,522,385 $4,889,595 Total Facilities and Equipment Valuel'1 $3,304,890 $40,701,465 $44,006,355 Total Number of Acres1101 35.38 511.27 546.65 Facilities and Equipment Value per Acre1111 $93,411 $79,609 $80,502 Level-of-Service(12) 0.36 5.23 5.59 Facilities and Equipment Value per Resident1131 $33.63 $416.36 $449.99 (1) Source: Table VIII -1 (2) Based on insurance values of existing facilities, information from previous studies for IRC as well as information from other Florida jurisdictions (3) Source: Table VIII -1 (4) Unit value (Item 2) multiplied by the number of units per facility (Item 3) (5) Source: Table VIII -1 (6) Unit replacement value (Item2) multiplied by the number of units per facility (Item 5) (7) Sum of the total value for community parks (Item 4) and the total value of regional parks (Item 6) (8) Facility and equipment value multiplied by 12.5% based on discussions with Indian River County (9) Sum of the facilities and equipment replacement value and the architecture, engineering, and inspection cost (Item 8) for each park (10) Source: Table VIII -1 (11) Total facilities and equipment cost (Item 9) divided by the total number of acres (Item 10) for each park type (12) Source: Table VIII -2 (13) Facilities and equipment value per acre (Item 11) multiplied by the level -of -service (Item 12) divided by 1,000 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 96 Impact Fee Update Study 131 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Total Impact Cost per Resident Table VIII -6 presents the total impact cost per resident for parks and recreation facilities in Indian River County. Using the current achieved LOS, as previously presented in Table VIII - 2, the total cost for neighborhood/community parks in Indian River County is $61 per resident and the total cost for regional parks is $809 per resident, for a total of $869 per resident. Table VIII -6 Total Impact Cost per Resident Component Park Type Neighborhood/ Community Regional Total Total Land Value per Residents' $27.00 $392.25 $419.25 Total Facility Value perResidenti�1 $33.63416.36 $449.99 Total Impact Cost per Resident(3) $60.63 $808.61 $869.24 (1) Source: Table VIII -4 (2) Source: Table VIII -5 (3) Sum of the land value per resident (Item 1) and the facility value per acre (Item 2) Credit Component To avoid overcharging new development for the capital cost of providing parks and recreation services, a review of the capital financing program for the parks and recreation program was completed. The purpose of this review was to determine any potential revenues generated by new development, other than impact fees, which have been used within the last five years or planned to be used over the next five years to fund the expansion of capital facilities, land, and equipment related to Indian River County's parks and recreation program. Based on this review, Indian River County's parks capital expansion improvements are being funded primarily with sales tax revenues (96 percent of total non -impact fee spending), and, at a lesser degree, with general fund and grant revenues. Capital Expansion Expenditures Credit Between 2008 and 2017, Indian River County spent or planned to spend a total of $6.4 million for capital expansion of parks, resulting in an average annual capital expansion expenditure of $639,000. Since the review of these expenditures spanned 2008 through 2017, the average annual capital expansion cost is divided by the average population for Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 97 Impact Fee Update Study l32. Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study this same period. As presented in Table VIII -7, the average annual capital expansion expenditure is approximately $7 per resident. As mentioned previously, a large part of this funding (96 percent) is obtained from the optional sales tax, which will expire in 2019. This analysis assumes that the sales tax will not be re -adopted. If the sales tax is re -adopted, the credit calculations should be reviewed to determine if a revision is needed. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 98 Impact Fee Update Study 133 Indian River County) Impact Fee Update Study Table VIII -7 Historical and Programmed Capital Costs Project Descriptionitl FY 2007/08 FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12 FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Total Sales Tax: Parks Maintenance Complex - - 51,512,092 - - - - - - - 51,512,092 Gifford Park Security House $146,084 - - - - - - - - - 5146,084 West County Regional Park - - - - - - - - - 51,000,000 51,000,000 North County Soccer lights - - - - - -- - - 550,000 550,000 South County Regional Park Fence Project Ph. II - - - - - - $100,000 - - $100,000 South County Intergenerational Multi -Purpose Facility - _ $1,843,545 $1,500,000 $3,343,545 Subtotal -- Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues $146,084 - 51,512,092 - - $1,843,545 51,600,000 - - 51,050,000 $6,151,721 Subtotal -- Average Annual Expenditures Funded with Sales Tax Revenues121 $615,172 Average Annual Expenditures per Resident (Sales Tax)131 56.31 General Fund Revenues & Grants: Gifford Park Football Fields - 515,210 - - - - - - - - 515,210 Irrigation of Football Fields (Gifford Park) 523,310 - - - - - - - - - 523,310 Oslo Boat Ramp & Parking -- - 5200,000 - _ a y 5200,000 Subtotal -- Expenditures Funded with General Fund & Grants $23,310 $15,210 _ - _ - - 5200,000 - - - - 5238,520 Subtotal -- Average Annual Expenditures Funded with General Fund & Grantst41 523,852 Average Annual Expenditures per Resident (General Fund & Grants)151 $0.24 Sales Tax and General Fund Revenues and Grants: Total 1 5169,3941 515,2101 $1,512,0921 501 $01 52,043,5451 51,600,0001 501 $01 51,050,000 56,390,241 Average Annual Expenditures(6) 5639,024 Average Annual Population - Unincorporated Countyl'1 97,443 Average Annual Expenditures per Residential 56.56 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Subtotal —expenditures funded with sales tax revenues divided by 10 years (3) Subtotal —average annual expenditures funded with sales tax revenues (Item 2) divided by the average annual population (Item 7) (4) Subtotal —expenditures funded with general funds & grants divided by 10 years (5) Subtotal —average annual expenditures funded with general fund & grants (Item 4) divided by the average annual population (Item 7) (6) Total parks & recreational facilities expenditures divided by 10 years (7) Source: Appendix A, Table A-1; Unincorporated County (8) Average annual expenditures (Item 6) divided by the average annual population (Item 7) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 99 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Cost The net parks and recreation impact fee per resident is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table VIII -8 summarizes the calculation of the net parks and recreation cost per resident for both neighborhood/community and regional parks. The first section of Table VIII -8 identifies the total impact cost as $869 per resident for all parks. The second section of the table identifies the revenue credits for the parks and recreation impact fee, totaling approximately $34 for all parks. The net impact cost per resident is the different between the total impact cost and the total revenue credit per resident. This results in a net impact cost of $836 per resident for all parks, which also reflects the relevant measure of LOS for impact fee calculation purposes. Table VIII -8 Net Impact Cost per Resident Revenue Credits Calculation Step Impact Cost Sales Tax General Fund Total & Grants Impact Cost Total Impact Cost per Resident(1) $869.24 Revenue Credit Avg Annual Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(2) $6.31 $0.24 Capitalization Rate 2.5% 2.5% Capitalization Period (in years) 5 25 Capital Expansion Credit per Resident(3) $29.32 $4.42 $33.74 Net Impact Cost Net Impact Cost per Resident(4) $835.50 (1) Source: Table VIII -6 (2) Source: Table VIII -7 (3) Source: The present value of the capital improvement credit per resident (Item 2) at a discount rate of 2.5% with a capitalization period of 5 years for sales tax expenditures and 25 years for general fund & grant expenditures. (4) Total impact cost per resident (Item 1) less the total revenue credit per resident (Item 3) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 100 Impact Fee Update Study !35- Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Calculated Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Table VIII -9 presents the calculated parks and recreation impact fee schedule developed for residential land uses. As previously mentioned, only residential development within unincorporated Indian River County is assessed a parks and recreation impact fee. Table VIII -9 Calculated Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Schedule Total Current Impact Residents Net Cost per Percent Land Use,, Impact Adopted Unit per Unit(�) Resident((3� (Q) Change(5) Fee Fee Residential Single Family (less than 1,000 sf) du 2.03 $835.50 $1,696 $1,302 30.3% Single Family (1,000 to 1,499sf) du 2.19 $835.50 $1,830 $1,302 40.6% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499 sf) du 2.33 $835.50 $1,947 $1,463 33.1% Single Family (2,500 sf or greater) du 2.59 $835.50 $2,164 $1,587 36.4% Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 1.33 $835.50 $1,111 $884 25.7% Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) du 1.30 $835.50 $1,086 $942 15.3% (1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-3 (2) Source: Table VIII -8 (3) Residents per unit (Item 1) for each land use category multiplied by net cost per resident (Item 2) (4) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee (5) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 4) to the calculated total impact fee rate (Item 3) Affordable Growth Strategy Based on a review of capital expansion expenditures between 2008 and 2017, the County will use approximately $639,000 per year of non -impact fee funding over the next five years and $24,000 per year afterwards. As mentioned previously, during the next 25 years, the County is expected to grow at an annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure VIII -1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. The maximum calculated fee is compared investment needed to maintain the current adopted LOS standard. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of parks and recreation impact fee calculated, the County needs approximately 92 percent of the maximum impact fee revenues to maintain the current LOS. As mentioned previously, the available non- impact fee consists primarily of sales tax revenues. These calculations assume that the sales tax will not be re -adopted in 2019. If the sales tax is re -adopted, the Affordable Growth calculations should be reviewed to see if a revision is necessary. In addition, the County is targeting non-residential land uses for potential discounts and the parks and recreation fees are charged only to residential land uses. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 101 Impact Fee Update Study 134 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study 120% - 100% 80% to • 60% co 40% 20% Figure VIII -1 Parks and Recreation Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Strategy 92% — Total Cost —Maximum Impact Fee - - LOS Curve 0% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Table VIII -10 presents discounted impact fee schedule. Table VIII -10 Calculated Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Schedule — Affordable Growth Land Use Residential;'. Affordable Impact Growth Unit Adoption Rateill Total Current Impact Adopted Fee(2) Fee(3) Percent Change(4) Single Family (less than 1,000sf) du 92% $1,560 $1,302 19.8% Single Family (1,000 to 1,499sf) du 92% $1,684 $1,302 29.3% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499 sf) du 92% $1,791 $1,463 22.4% Single Family (2,500sf or greater) du 92% $1,991 $1,587 25.5% Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 92% $1,022 $884 15.6% Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) du 92% $999 $942 6.1% (1) Calculated based on an average annual spending of $639,000 for the next 5 years and $24,000 per year afterwards, and an average annual growth rate of 1.4% over the next 25 years (2) Total impact fee from Table VIII -9 (Item 5) multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee (4) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 3) to the calculated total impact fee rate (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 102 Impact Fee Update Study I37 Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Staff Recommended Fee Rate In the case of parks and recreation facilities impact fee, the County staff recommends adopting the affordable growth fees with a 25 -percent discount. This approach takes into consideration the expected capital needs over the next several years and will be reviewed during the next technical study update. Table VIII -11 Calculated Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Schedule — Staff Recommended Fee Rates Staff Total Current Impact Percent Land Use Recommended Impact Adopted UnitChangei4l Adjustment(1) Fee (2) Fee (3) Residential Single Family (less than 1,000sf) du 75% $1,170 $1,302 -10.1% Single Family (1,000 to 1,499sf) du 75% $1,263 $1,302 -3.0% Single Family (1,500 to 2,499sf) du 75% $1,343 $1,463 -8.2% Single Family (2,500 sf or greater) du 75% $1,493 $1,587 -5.9% Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 75% $767 $884 -13.2% Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) du 75% $749 $942 -20.5% (1) Source: Indian River County Staff recommends charging 75 percent of the affordable growth fee rates (2) Total impact fee from Table VIII -10 multiplied by the staff recommended adjustment (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee (4) Percent change from the current adopted rates (Item 3) to the calculated total impact fee rate (Item 2) Parks & Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's parks and recreation impact fee program, a comparison impact fee schedules was completed for surrounding counties and other jurisdictions throughout Florida. Table VIII -12 presents this comparison. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 103 Impact Fee Update Study 138 $1,791 Indian River County ( Impact Fee Update Study Table VIII -12 Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Comparison Land Use Date of Last Update Adoption Percentage Single Family (2,000 sf) Multi-Family/Accessory Unit Mobile Home/RV Park (tied down) Unit(1) du 1,000 sf 1,000 sf Calculated') 2013 100% $1,947 $1,111 $1,086 Indian River County Affordable Growth(3) 2013 n/a $1,022 $999 Staffl9) 2013 2009 St. Lucie Osceola Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Highlands Martin St. Johns Adopted County County'I Countyi8l County19) County1101 County") County��1 County") County19) Feels) 2005 2009 2006 2009 2010 2010 2005 2006 2012 2011 n/a 100% $1,343 $1,463 100% 10096 100% 50% 100% 10056 100% 10096 100% $1,533 $924 $718 $566 $3,133 $411 $757 $1,972 $472 $767 $884 $1,368 $679 $480 $425 $1,685 $311 $525 $1,972 $472 $749 $942 $1,004 $677 $508 $543 $2,393 $411 $431 $1,972 $472 1) du = dwelling unit 2) Source: Table VIII -9 3) Source: Table VIII -10 4) Source: Table VIII -11; Indian River County recommends charging 75 percent of the affordable growth fee rates 5) Source: Indian River County; Fees do not include the administrative fee 6) Source: St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing. 7) Source: Osceola County Community Development Department 8) Source: Charlotte County Community Development Department. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. Fees are currently suspended. 9) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department 10) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department. Average of community and regional parks. Fees have been reduced to above rates through annual indexing. 11) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department 12) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28. Impact fees moratorium in effect through June 30, 2014. 13) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department (14) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department. Fees have been increased to above rates through annual indexing. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 104 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study IX. Transportation Indian River County's Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance was most recently updated in 2009 to assist the County in providing adequate transportation facilities for expected growth. This section of the impact fee report provides the results of the transportation impact fee analysis and consists of the following sections: • Demand Component • Cost Component • Credit Component • Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Staff Recommended Fee Rate • Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As in the case of other impact fee program areas, the methodology used for the transportation impact fee study follows a consumption -based impact fee approach, in which new development is charged based upon the proportion of vehicle -miles of travel (VMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway network. Included in this document is the necessary support material used in the calculation of the transportation impact fee. The general equation used to compute the impact fee for a given land use is: [Demand x Cost] — Credit = Fee The demand for travel placed on the transportation system is expressed in units of VMT (daily vehicle -trip generation rate times the trip length times the percent new trips [of total trips]) for each land use contained in the impact fee schedule. The trip generation is expressed in average daily rates since new development consumes trips on a daily basis. The cost of building new capacity typically is expressed in units of dollars per vehicle mile or lane mile of roadway capacity. The credit is an estimate of the future non -impact fee revenues generated by new development that are allocated to transportation capacity expansion construction projects. Thus, the impact fee is an "up front" payment for a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 105 Impact Fee Update Study 1140 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study portion of the cost of building a lane mile of capacity directly related to the amount of capacity consumed by each unit of land use contained in the impact fee schedule that is not paid for by future tax revenues generated by new development. It should be noted that the information used to develop the impact fee schedule was based on the most recent, reliable, and localized data available. The following input variables used in the fee equation: Demand Variables: • Trip generation rate •, Trip length • Percent new trips • Interstate and toll facility discount factor Cost Variables: • Cost per lane mile • Capacity added per lane mile Credit Variables: • Equivalent gas tax credit (pennies) • Present worth • Fuel efficiency • Effective days per year A review of impact fee variables and corresponding recommendations are presented in the following subsections. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 106 Impact Fee Update Study l4I Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Demand Component Travel Demand The amount of transportation system consumed by a unit of new land development is calculated using the following variables and is measured in terms of the vehicle miles of new travel a unit of development consumes on the existing road system. • Number of daily trips generated; • Average length of those trips; and • Proportion of travel that is new travel, rather than travel that is already traveling on the road system and is captured by new development. As part of this update, the trip characteristics variables were obtained primarily from two sources: (1) trip characteristics studies previously conducted throughout Florida by TOA (Florida Studies Database), and (2) the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation report (9th edition). The Florida Studies Database is included in Appendix B. This database was used to determine VMT, which is developed from trip length, percent new trips, and trip rate for most land uses in the fee schedule. The data in the trip characteristics database is based on actual land use studies and was collected throughout Florida using machine traffic counts and site specific land use origin -destination surveys. In addition, trip generation data from the 1TE 9th Edition Trip Generation report was used. In instances where trip generation was available from the 1TE Trip Generation report and the Florida Studies Database, a blended average calculation was used to increase the sample size. Interstate and Toll Facility Discount Factor This variable is used to recognize that improvements to Interstate highways are funded by the State using earmarked and Federal funds, while toll facility improvements are funded with toll revenues. Typically, impact fees are not used to pay for these improvements, and the portion of new development's travel occurring on the interstate/toll facility system usually is eliminated from the total travel for each land use. To calculate the interstate and toll (I/T) facility discount factor, the loaded highway network file was generated for the Greater Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model v3.4 (GTCRPM). A select link analysis was run for all traffic analysis zones located within Indian Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 107 Impact Fee Update Study 14 2 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study River County in order to differentiate trips with an origin and/or destination within the county versus trips with no origin or destination within the county. Currently, the only interstate/toll facilities in Indian River County are 1-95 and the Florida Turnpike (SR 19). The limited access vehicle miles of travel (Limited Access VMT) for trips with an origin and/or destination within Indian River County was calculated for the identified limited access facilities. The total Indian River County VMT was calculated for all trips with an origin and/or destination within Indian River County for all roads, including limited access roads, located within Indian River County. The I/T discount factor of 17.3 percent was determined by dividing the total Limited Access VMT by the total Indian River County VMT. By applying this factor to the total Indian River County VMT for each land use in the fee schedule, the reduced VMT is then representative of only the roadways which are funded by impact fees. Appendix B, Table B-1 provides further detail on this calculation. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 108 Impact Fee Update Study ILI3 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component The cost of providing roadway system capacity has decreased in recent years. Construction costs increased significantly in Florida between 2005 and 2007 due to additional construction demand caused by hurricanes, the housing market growth, and other factors. Appreciation in land values also resulted in higher right-of-way (ROW) costs during the same period. In early 2008, costs started to stabilize, and in recent years, communities have experienced a decrease in construction costs, returning to levels seen before 2005. Cost information from Indian River County, other Florida Counties, and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) was reviewed to develop a unit cost for all phases involved in the construction of one lane -mile of roadway capacity. The following subsections summarize the methodology and findings of the total unit cost analysis for county and state roads. Appendix C provides the data and other support information utilized in these analyses. County Roadway Costs This section examines the right-of-way (ROW), construction, and other cost components associated with county roads with respect to transportation capacity improvements in Indian River County. For this purpose, recent bid data for ongoing projects provided by the County and recent construction bid data from county roadway projects throughout Florida were used to identify and provide supporting cost data for county improvements. The cost for each roadway capacity project was separated into four phases: design, construction/engineering inspection (CEI), ROW and construction. Design and CEI Design costs for county roads were estimated at 10 percent construction phase costs based on a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C-10. CEI costs for county roads were estimated at 9 percent of construction phase costs based on a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C-16. Right -of -Way The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along a corridor that were necessary to have sufficient cross-section width to widen an existing road or, in the case of new construction, to build a new road. A review of recent ROW cost data for Indian River Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 109 Impact Fee Update Study i4y Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study County identified 12 recent improvements with acquisition data. Using the construction costs for these improvements, a ROW factor of construction was calculated for each improvement, ranging from six (6) to 150 percent, with a weighted average of approximately 41 percent. This calculated local factor was consistent with county road ROW factors observed in recent impact fee studies throughout Florida and was used as the basis for ROW costs in Indian River County. As seen in Table IX -1, this amount is equal to approximately $0.66 million per lane mile for county roads. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Tables C-4, C-5, C-11, and C-12. Construction The construction cost for county roads was based on a review of local and statewide projects. A review of recent construction cost data for Indian River County identified 12 recent capacity expansion improvements throughout the County. Based on these improvements, a weighted average cost of $1.80 million per lane mile was calculated for use in the impact fee calculation (as seen in Table IX -1). This figure was compared to the average construction cost per lane mile observed in other jurisdictions throughout the state. These statewide projects averaged approximately $2.18 million per lane mile for construction. Therefore, compared to the statewide data, local Indian River costs are approximately 83 percent of the statewide average. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Tables, C-6, C-7, C-13, and C-14. Table IX -1 Estimated Total Cost per Lane Mile for County Roads Cost Cost Phase Urban Design Design(1) $180,000 per Lane Mile Rural Design $149,000 Weighted Average $159,000 Right-of-Way(2) $738,000 $613,000 $656,000 Construction(3) $1,800,000 $1,494,000 $1,598,000 CEI(4) $162,000 $134,000 $143,000 Total Cost $2,880,000 $2,390,000 $2,556,000 1) Source: Appendix C, Table C-2 (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-4 (3) Source: Appendix C, Table C-6 4) Source: Appendix C, Table C-8 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 110 Impact Fee Update Study ty5 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study State Roadway Costs This section examines the ROW, construction, and other cost components associated with state roads with respect to transportation capacity improvements in Indian County. For this purpose, recent bid data from state roadway projects throughout Florida and the FDOT's Long Range Estimates (LRE) were used to identify and provide supporting cost data for state improvements. The cost for each roadway capacity project was separated into four phases: design, CEI, ROW and construction. Design and CE1 Design costs for state roads were estimated at 9 percent construction phase costs based on a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C-10. CEI costs for state roads were estimated at 11 percent of construction phase costs based on a review of cost data collected for recent transportation impact fee studies throughout Florida. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C-16. Right -of -Way Due to a lack of local right-of-way acquisition cost data for state roads in Indian River County, a review of ROW costs from recent transportation fee studies throughout Florida was conducted. Based on this review, ROW for state roadways was estimated at 44 percent of the construction cost for state roads. As shown in Table IX -2, this amount is equal to approximately $0.78 million per lane mile. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C-12. Construction A review of recent state road capacity improvements in Indian River identified three projects from 2008 and 2009 (SR 60 and SR 5 widening). These three projects averaged approximately $2.95 million per lane mile for construction. However, due to the small sample size, these projects were blended with 49 additional capacity expansion projects throughout Florida, which resulted in a weighted average cost of $2.44 million per lane mile. An analysis of county roadway improvements, where a larger sample of local projects was available, in relation to statewide county road improvements, indicated that construction costs average approximately 83 percent of construction costs statewide. Based on this conclusion, the construction costs for state roadways in Indian River County Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 111 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study were estimated at 83 percent of the state average of $2.44 million. Additional detail is provided in Appendix C, Table C-15. Table IX -2 Estimated Total Cost per Lane Mile for State Roads Cost per Lane Mile Cost Phase Urban Rural Weighted Design Design Average Design') $220,000 $183,000 $196,000 Right-of-Way(2) $880,000 $730,000 $781,000 Construction(3) $2,000,000 $1,660,000 $1,776,000 CEI (4) $220,000 $183,000 $196,000 Total Cost $3,320,000 $2,756,000 $2,949,000 1) Source: Appendix C, Table C-3 (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-5 3) Source: Appendix C, Table C-7 (4) Source: Appendix C, Table C-9 Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis) The weighted average cost per lane mile for county and state roads is presented in Table X- 3. The resulting weighted average cost of approximately $2.59 million per lane mile was utilized as the roadway cost input in the calculation of the transportation impact fee schedule. The weighted average cost per lane mile includes county and state roads and is based on weighting the lane miles of roadway improvements in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Compared to the previous transportation impact fee update, the estimated cost of $2.59 million represents a slight increase in the unit cost per lane mile for roadway. The previous cost, established in a 2004 Traffic Impact Fee Study, was estimated at $2.46 million. This represents a five percent increase in the roadway unit cost per lane mile since the 2004 study. Compared to recent transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida in the past few years, the unit cost per lane mile estimated in this update study for Indian River County is considerably lower. Recent unit costs have ranged from approximately $2.91 million to $4.44 million, with an average cost of $3.61 million. The lower costs in Indian River County can be attributed to the lower construction costs observed in recent local bids Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 112 Impact Fee Update Study 147 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study as well as the mix of planned urban and rural designed roadways. Compared to other jurisdictions, Indian River County plans to construct a greater proportion of rural designed roadways, which are Tess expensive than roadways with urban design characteristics. Table IX -3 Estimated Cost per Lane Mile for County and State Roadway Projects in Indian River County Cost Phase Design County Roads(1) $159,000 State Roads(2) $196,000 County and State Roads(3) $162,000 Right -of -Way $656,000 $781,000 $667,000 Construction $1,598,000 $1,776,000 $1,614,000 CEI $143,000 $196,000 $148,000 Total Cost Lane Mile Distribution(4) $2,556,000 91% $2,949,000 9% $2,591,000 100% (1) Source: Table IX -1 (2) Source: Table IX -2 (3) Lane mile distribution (Item 4) multiplied by the design, ROW, construction, and CEI phase costs by jurisdiction to develop a weighted average cost per lane mile (4) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17, Items (a) and (b) Capacity Added per Lane Mile An additional component of the transportation impact fee equation is the capacity added per lane mile (also known as the maximum service volume added per mile) of roadway constructed. To calculate the vehicle miles of capacity (VMC) per lane mile of constructed future roadway, an analysis of the 2035 projects (see Appendix C, Table C-17) was conducted to reflect the mix of county and state road improvement that will be built in the future. As shown in Table IX -4, the resulting average capacity per lane mile calculated based on these projects is 8,255. The updated capacity added per lane mile estimate of 8,255 is approximately three percent less than the figure used in the 2004 Traffic Impact Fee Study. It should be noted that this figure (8,499) was not changed as part of the 2009 update. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 113 Impact Fee Update Study 048 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -4 Weighted Average Vehicle -Miles of Capacity per Lane Mile Source County Roads State Roads Total Lane Mile Added(' 201.90 19.00 220.90 Vehicle Miles of VMC Added per CapacityAdded(2) Lane Mile(3) 1,632,287 191.352 1,823,639 Weighted Average VMC Added per Lane Milel4) 8,085 10,071 8,255 (1) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (3) Vehicle miles of capacity added (Item 2) divided by lane miles added (Item 1) (4) Total vehicle miles of capacity added for county and state roads (Item 2) divided by the total lane miles added (Item 1) Cost per Vehicle -Mile of Capacity Added The impact fee cost per unit of development is assessed based on the cost per vehicle -mile of capacity. As shown in Tables IX -3 and IX -4, the cost and capacity for county roads have been calculated based on typical roadway improvements. As shown in Table IX -5, the cost per VMC for travel within IRC is approximately $314. This average cost per VMC figure is used in the impact fee calculation to determine the total impact cost per unit of development based on the vehicle -miles of travel consumed. For each vehicle -mile of travel that is added to the road system, approximately $314 of roadway capacity is consumed. Table IX -5 Weighted Average Cost per Vehicle -Mile of Capacity Added Source County Roads State Roads Weighted Average Cost per Lane Mile(1) $2,556,000 $2,949,000 $2,591,000 Average VMC Added per Lane Mile(2) 8,085 10,071 8,255 Cost per VMC(3) $316.14 $292.82 $313.87 (1) Source: Table IX -3 (2) Source: Table IX -4 (3) Cost per lane mile (Item 1) divided by average capacity added per lane mile (Item 2) It is important to note that capacity projects eligible for impact fee funding include not only new construction and Zane additions, but also associated intersection improvements, traffic signalization, and other amenities and technology improvements that allow for additional vehicle capacity. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 114 Impact Fee Update Study 144 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Credit Component Gasoline Tax Equivalent Credit The present value of the portion of non -impact fee revenues (converted to equivalent gasoline taxes) generated by a new development over a 25 -year period that is projected to be expended on capacity expansion projects is credited against the cost of the system consumed by travel associated with new development. County A review of the County's historical roadway financing program (FY 2008-2013) and the FY 2014- 2017 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) shows that all roadway projects are being funded by a combination of fuel taxes, sales tax, grants, developer funds, and transportation impact fees. Currently, capacity -adding projects in the county are primarily funded with fuel tax and sales tax revenues. Based on the FY 2014-2017 CIP and discussions with County staff, it was assumed that sales tax revenues will only be available to fund transportation capacity over the next five years, and will not be a recurring revenue source. Therefore, only five years of sales tax revenues are included in the credit calculations. If the sales tax is re -adopted in 2019 or a different revenue source is allocated to the transportation capacity to replace the sales tax revenues, these credit figures may need to be revised. As shown in Table IX -6, the sales tax portion of the county credit was separated from the total county credit and all non -impact fee funding allocated to transportation capacity was converted to equivalent gas tax revenues. A total gas tax equivalent revenue credit of 11.1 pennies was given for sales tax revenues and 5.6 pennies was given for all other revenue sources. State State expenditures on state roads were reviewed, and a credit for the capacity expansion portion attributable to state projects was estimated. The equivalent number of pennies allocated to fund state projects was determined from projects spanning a 10 -year period (2009-2018). This period represents past expenditures (from 2009 to 2013) from the FDOT Work Program and the projected expenditures (from 2014 to 2018) from the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). A list of capacity -adding roadway projects was developed, including lane additions, new road construction, intersection improvements, interchanges, traffic signal projects, and other capacity -addition projects. This review (summarized in Appendix D, Table D- 3) indicates that FDOT spending generates an equivalent gas tax credit of 15.5 pennies of gas tax revenue annually, which is within the range of what is observed in most other Florida jurisdictions. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 115 Impact Fee Update Study r5D Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In summary, Indian River County contributes approximately 16.7 pennies toward roadway capacity expansion projects, while the State spends an average of 15.5 pennies for state roadway projects in Indian County. Therefore, a total of 32.2 pennies of credit are included in the impact fee calculation to recognize the future capital revenue that is expected to be generated by new development from all non -impact fee revenues, as shown in Table IX -6. Table IX -6 Equivalent Pennies of Gas Tax Revenue Credit County Revenues (excluding sales tax)(' County Revenues (sales tax ONLY)(�) State Revenues(3) Total Equivalent Pennies per Gallon $0.056 $o.111 $0.155 $0.322 (1) Source: Appendix D, Table D-2 (2) Source: Appendix D, Table D-3 (only accounts for 5 years of sales tax revenues) (3) Source: Appendix D, Table D-4 Present Worth Variables Facility Life The roadway facility life used in the impact fee analysis is 25 years, which represents the reasonable life of a roadway. Interest Rate This is the discount rate at which gasoline tax revenues might be bonded. It is used to compute the present value of the gasoline taxes generated by new development. The discount rate of 2.5 percent was used in the transportation impact fee calculation based on the estimate obtained from Indian River County. Fuel Efficiency The fuel efficiency (i.e., the average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed) of the fleet of motor vehicles was estimated using the quantity of gasoline consumed by travel associated with a particular land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 116 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Appendix D, Table D-8 documents the calculation of fuel efficiency value based on the following equation, where "VMT" is vehicle miles of travel and "MPG" is fuel efficiency in terms of miles per gallon. Fuel Efficiency= IVMT oadwayType —1 VMT ehicleType MPGvehicleType JRoadwayType The methodology uses non -interstate VMT and average fuel efficiency data for passenger vehicles (i.e., passenger cars and other 2 -axle, 4 -tire vehicles, such as vans, pickups, and SUVs) and Targe trucks (i.e., single -unit, 2 -axle, 6 -tire or more trucks and combination trucks) to calculate the total gallons of fuel used by each of these vehicle types. The combined total VMT for the vehicle types is then divided by the combined total gallons of fuel consumed to calculate, in effect, a "weighted" fuel efficiency value that reflects the existing fleet mix of traffic on non -interstate roadways. The VMT and average fuel efficiency data were obtained from the most recent Federal Highway Administration's Highway Statistics 2011. Based on the calculation completed in Appendix D, Table D-8, the fuel efficiency rate to be used in the updated impact fee equation is 18.19 miles per gallon. Effective Days per Year An effective 365 days per year of operation was assumed for all land uses in the proposed fee. However, this will not be the case for all land uses since some uses operate only on weekdays (e.g., office buildings) and/or only seasonally (e.g., schools). The use of 365 days per year, therefore, provides a conservative estimate, ensuring that gasoline taxes are adequately credited against the fee. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 117 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule The impact fee calculations for each land use are included in Appendix E, which includes the major land use categories and the impact fees for the individual land uses contained in each of the major categories. For each land use, Appendix E illustrates the following: • Demand component variables (trip rate, trip length, and percent of new trips); • Total impact fee cost; • Annual gas tax credit; • Present value of the gas tax credit; • Net transportation impact fee; • Current Indian River County impact fee; and • Percent difference between the calculated impact fee and the 2009 adopted impact fee. It should be noted that the net impact fee illustrated in Appendix E is not necessarily a recommended fee, but instead represents the technically defensible impact fee per unit of land use that could be charged in Indian River County. For clarification purposes, the calculation of an impact fee for one land use category is presented. In the following example, the net impact fee is calculated for the single-family residential detached land use category (ITE LUC 210) using information from the impact fee schedule included in Appendix E, Table E-1. For each land use category, the following equations are utilized to calculate the net impact fee: Net Impact Fee = Total Impact Cost — Gas Tax Credit Where: Total Impact Cost = ([Trip Rate x Assessable Trip Length x % New Trips] / 2) x (1 — Interstate/Toll Facility Disc. Factor) x (Cost per Vehicle -Mile of Capacity) Gas Tax Credit = Present Value (Annual Gas Tax), given 2.5% interest rate & 25 -year facility life Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 118 Impact Fee Update Study 153 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Annual Gas/Sales Tax = ([Trip Rate x Total Trip Length x % New Trips] / 2) x (Effective Days per Year x $/Gallon to Capital) / Fuel Efficiency Each of the inputs has been discussed previously in this document; however, for purposes of this example, brief definitions for each input are provided in the following paragraphs, along with the actual inputs used in the calculation of the fee for the single-family detached residential land use (1,500-2,499 sf) category: • Trip Rate = the average daily trip generation rate, in vehicle-trips/day (7.81). • Assessable Trip Length = the actual average trip length for the category, in vehicle -miles (6.62). • Total Trip Length = the assessable trip length plus an adjustment factor of half a mile, which is added to the trip length to account for the fact that gas taxes are collected for travel on all roads including local roads (6.62 + 0.50 = 7.12). • % New Trips = adjustment factor to account for trips that are already on the roadway (100%). • Divide by 2 = the total daily miles of travel generated by a particular category (i.e., rate*length*% new trips) is divided by two to prevent the double -counting of travel generated between two land use codes since every trip has an origin and a destination. • Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor = discount factor to account for the travel demand occurring on interstate highways and/or toll facilities (17.3%). • Cost per Lane Mile = unit cost to construct one lane mile of roadway, in $/lane -mile ($2,591,000). • Average Capacity Added per Lane Mile = represents the average daily traffic on one travel lane at capacity for one lane mile of roadway, in vehicles/lane-mile/day (8,255). • Cost per Vehicle -Mile of Capacity = unit of vehicle -miles of capacity consumed per unit of development. Cost per lane mile divided by average capacity added per lane mile ($2,591,000 / 8,255 = $313.87). • Present Value = calculation of the present value of a uniform series of cash flows, gas tax payments in this case, given an interest rate, "i," and a number of periods, "n;" for 2.5% interest and a 25 -year facility life, the uniform series present worth factor is 18.4244. For sales tax, which is available only for the next five years, the present worth factor is 4.6458. • Effective Days per Year = 365 days. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 119 Impact Fee Update Study 15'1 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • $/Gallon to Capital = the amount of gas tax revenue per gallon of fuel that is used for capital improvements, in $/gallon ($0.211 for gas tax; $0.111 for sales tax). • Fuel Efficiency= average fuel efficiency of vehicles, in vehicle-miles/gallon (18.19). Transportation Impact Fee Calculation Using these inputs, a net impact fee can be calculated for the single-family residential detached land use (1,500-2,499 sf) category as follows: Total Impact Cost = ([7.81 * 6.62 * 1.0] /2) * (1 - 0.173) * ($313.87) = $6,710 Annual Sales Tax Credit = ([7.81 * 7.12 * 1.0] /2) * 365 * ($0.111 /18.19) = $62 Sales Tax Credit = $62 * 4.6458 = $288 Annual Credit for Gas Tax and Other Sources = ([7.81 * 7.12 * 1.0] /2) * 365 * ($0.211 /18.19) _ $118 Gas Tax Credit = $118 * 18.4244 = $2174 Total Credit =$288 + $2,174 = $2,462 Net Impact Fee = $6,710 — $2,462 = $4,248 A comparison of calculated fee schedule to the current adopted fee by land use is presented in Table IX -7. The detailed fee schedule that includes the calculations shown above is presented in Appendix E, Table E-1. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 120 Impact Fee Update Study 15- Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -7 Transportation Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC land Use Unit RESIDENTIAL: Total Impact Total Total 2009 Adopted Percent Costw Credit Impact Fee") Feel') Change 210 Single Family Detached - Less than 1,000 sf du $4,966 $1,817 $3,149 $2,974 6% -1,000 to 1,499 sf du $5,602 $2,048 $3,554 $2,974 20% -1,500 to 2,499 sf du $6,710 $2,462 $4,248 $4,483 -5% - 2,500 sf or larger du $7,904 $2,900 $5,004 $5,031 -1% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du $4,369 $1,627 $2,742 $2,428 13% 240 Mobile Home/RV (tied down) du $2,490 $940 51,550 51,745 -11% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room 53,410 $1,254 52,156 $2,804 -23% 320 Motel room 52,442 5918 51,524 51,516 1% 620 Nursing Home bed $826 $332 $494 $432 14% 252 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF) bed 5910 5355 5555 $620 -11% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf $15,277 $5,675 59,602 513,411 -28% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 522,258 $8,262 513,996 513,411 4% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 517,815 $7,304 510,511 510,634 -1% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf $23,401 59,581 513,820 513,020 6% 710 General Office 1,000sf $6,783 52,526 54,257 $3,798 1256 760 Research & Development Center 1,000sf 55,040 $1,876 53,164 $2,798 13% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 52,349 $876 51,473 51,318 12% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf $2,189 $817 $1,372 51,228 12% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 5796 5313 $483 $862 -44% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000sf 51,033 5378 5655 51,228 n/a 110 General Light Industrial 1,C00 sf 54,286 51,605 52,681 52,404 12% n/a Concrete Plant acre 59,593 $3,587 56,006 55,382 12% n/a Sand Mining acre 51,230 5461 $769 5690 11% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000gsf $10,680 $4,320 56,360 53,163 101% 944/ 946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. $8,923 $3,841 55,082 $5,587 -9% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 513,324 $5,030 58,294 $10,108 -18% 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 534,060 513,417 520,643 522,152 -7% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 578,855 533,391 $45,464 534,781 31% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 515,628 56,593 59,035 511,179 -19% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 510,632 54,113 56,519 $7,830 -1756 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay $8,454 $3,545 $4,909 514,589 -66% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 542,534 519,282 523,252 525,430 -9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 52,160 $793 $1,367 $1,373 0% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 527,636 $10,121 517,515 $11,248 56% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 520,690 57,723 512,967 510,824 20% 412 County Park acre $1,361 5502 $859 5718 20% 491 Tennis Court court 524,315 59,079 515,236 512,180 25% 420 Marina boat berth $2,289 5835 51,454 5973 49% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000sf $25,310 $9,452 515,858 $14,199 12% 590 Library 1,000sf 541,072 515,045 526,027 517,925 45% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000sf 517,169 56,409 510,760 $9,632 12% 571 Jail bed $3,382 51,273 52,109 $389 442% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 513,825 55,865 57,960 $8,847 -10% 610 Hospital LOCO sf 58,746 53,195 55,551 55,309 5% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 524,697 $9,226 $15,471 $3,511 341% 560 Church 1,000sf $4,150 51,586 52,564 $2,588 -1% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen $27,036 511,268 515,768 $22,743 -31% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 5576 $212 5364 $149 144% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student $814 $313 5501 $149 236% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student $859 $332 5527 5538 -2% 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student 51,547 5562 5985 $653 51% n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf $1,260 $539 $721 $983 -27,6 1) Source: Appendix E, Table E-1 (2) Total impact cost less the total credit (3) Source: Indian River County; fees do not include the administrative fee Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 121 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study fSI Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Affordable Growth Strategy As presented in Table IX -6 and Appendix D, in addition to impact fees, the County will uses a combination of gas tax, sales tax, and grant revenues to fund the transportation system. In terms of affordable growth calculations, it is important to note the following: • Consistent with the methodology used by many Florida jurisdictions, impact fee calculations are based on the adopted LOS standard, which is lower than the current achieved LOS. In other words, under the current methodology, even with the full impact fee, unless the County uses other revenue sources, the current achieved LOS for the system will deteriorate and more congestion will be experienced. It is Indian River County's policy to conduct a link -by -link capacity analysis and ensure that no link drops below LOS standard D. When the fee is calculated using the current achieved LOS, it amounts to $12,700 for a mid-size single family home, compared to $4,248 per home calculated using the adopted LOS standard. As such, the standard methodology used for transportation impact fees results in fee levels that slows down the degradation of the system, but does not generate sufficient revenues to maintain the existing conditions when they are better than the adopted LOS standard. • As mentioned previously, the credit calculations assume that the local option sales tax will not be re -adopted in 2019. In addition, the County had to defer maintenance expenses since 2006 through the CIP period due to lack of funding for capacity projects. Therefore, the available revenues for transportation capacity are likely to decrease in the future. The Affordable Growth calculations are based on this reduced funding and do not take into account funding from the State since the County does not control the State budget. If the sales tax is re -adopted or other revenue sources become available, these calculations will need to be revised. • Although the medium population projections from the University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) suggest an average growth rate of approximately 1.4 percent through 2040, the high projections indicate almost a 2 - percent annual growth rate. To mitigate the uncertainty of growth rates and given that even if adopted at 100 percent level, impact fees will not generate sufficient revenues to maintain the current LOS and that the transportation system will Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 122 Impact Fee Update Study 157 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study continue to degrade, the high growth projection is used in the affordable growth calculations for the transportation impact fee. Based on this scenario, the County would need approximately 90 percent of the fee for all land uses, as long as an additional funding of $10 million per year is available for the next five years and $2.7 million per year afterwards, with an average annual population growth rate of 2 percent. As presented in Figure IX -1, the red horizontal line represents the maximum technically acceptable fee. Although the County may charge the maximum amount of transportation impact fee calculated, if the estimated levels of non -impact fee funding continue to be available, the County could adopt the impact fee at approximately 90 percent for all land uses and continue to maintain the adopted LOS standard. Alternatively, if the County adopts the residential land uses at 100 percent, the fees for non- residential land uses could be reduced by up to 55 percent (or adopted at 45 percent) to maintain the adopted LOS standard. As mentioned previously, the level of discount is more of a policy decision and could be at any level between the minimum levels calculated in this section and 100 percent. 0 u co 12096 100% 80% 60% 40% 2096 Figure IX -1 Transportation Impact Fee – Affordable Growth Strategy Adopted LOS Standard i IRC Average Annual Growth —Total Cost —Maximum Impact Fee —LOS Curve 0% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.0036 Annual Growth Rate Table IX -8 presents discounted impact fee schedule. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 123 Impact Fee Update Study 1.53 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -8 Transportation Impact Fee Schedule -Affordable Growth Scenario Affordable Total Net 2009 Growth Percent ITE LUC Land Use Unit Adoption Impact Adopted Change Rate(1) Fee1�1 Fee111 i RESIDENTIAL: 210 Single Family Detached - Less than 1,000 sf du 100% $3,149 52,974 6% - 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 100% 53,554 $2,974 20% -1,500 to 2,499 sf du 100% $4,248 $4,483 -5% - 2,500 sf or larger du 100'% $5,004 $5,031 -1% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 100% 52,742 52,428 13% 240 Mobile Home/RV (tied down) du 100% 51,550 51,745 -11% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP (Adopted): 310 Hotel room 45% 5970 52,804 -65% 320 Motel room 45% 5686 51,516 -55% 620 Nursing Home bed 45% $222 5432 -49% 252 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF) bed 45% 5250 $620 -60% I OFFICE & FINANCIAL (Adopted): 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 45% $4,321 513,411 -68% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 45% 56,298 513,411 -53% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 45% 54,730 510,634 -56% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 45% 56,219 513,020 -52% 710 General Office 1,000sf 45% $1,916 53,798 -50% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 45% 51,424 $2,798 -49% INDUSTRIAL (Adopted): 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf 45% $663 51,318 -50% 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 45% $617 51,228 -50% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 45% 5217 $862 -75% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse" 1,000sf 45% $295 51,228 -76% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 45% 51,206 52,404 -50% n/a Concrete Plant acre 45% 52,703 $5,382 -50% n/a Sand Mining acre 45% 5346 5690 -50% RETAIL (Adopted): 820 Retail 1,000gsf 45% $2,862 53,163 -10% 944/ 946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 45% 52,287 $5,587 -59% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf 45% 53,732 510,108 -6396 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 45% 59,289 522,152 -58% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 1,000sf 45% 520,459 534,781 -41% 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 45% $4,066 511,179 -64% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 45% 52,934 57,830 -63% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 45% 52,209 514,589 -85% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 45% 510,463 525,430 -59% 890 FumitureStore 1,000sf 45% 5615 51,373 -55% RECREATIONAL (Adopted):. 430 Golf Course hole 45% $7,882 511,248 -30% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000sf 45% 55,835 510,824 -46% 412 County Park acre 45% $387 5718 -46% 491 Tennis Court court 45% $6,856 512,180 -44% 420 Marina boat berth 45% 5654 5973 -33% GOVERNMENTAL (Adopted): 732 Post Office 1,000sf 45% 57,136 $14,199 -50% 590 Library 1,000 sf 45% 511,712 517,925 -35% 733 Govemment Office Complex 1,000sf 45% $4,842 $9,632 -50% 571 Jail bed 45% 5949 5389 144% ( MISCELLANEOUS (Adopted): 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 45% 53,582 $8,847 -60% 610 Hospital 1,000sf 45% 52,498 55,309 -53% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 45% 56,962 $3,511 98% 560 Church 1,000sf 45% 51,154 $2,588 -55% 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 45% 57,096 $22,743 -69% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 45% 5164 5149 10% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student 45% 5225 5149 51% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 45% $237 5538 -56% 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student 45% $443 5653 -32% n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf 45% $324 $983 -67% •All Non -Residential fees have been adopted, except the High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse land use (1) Source: Calculated based on an average annual spending of 510 million for the next 5 years and $2.7 million per year afterwa ds, and an ave age annual growth rate of 2.0% over the next 25 years (2) Total net impact fee rates from Table IX -7 multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) (3) Source: Indian River County; Fees shown do not include the administrative fee Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 124 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 151 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Staff Recommended Fee Rate In the case of transportation impact fees, the County staff recommends implementing the affordable growth fees. Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in developing the Indian River County transportation impact fee program, a comparison of calculated fees to transportation impact fee schedules adopted in other jurisdictions was completed. Table IX -9 presents Indian River County's calculated impact fee and a comparison to transportation impact fees in the surrounding and other jurisdictions in Florida. It should be noted that the differences in fee levels for a given land use can be caused by several factors, including the year of the technical study, adoption percentage, study methodology including variations in costs, credits and travel demand, land use categories included in the fee schedule, etc. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 125 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table IX -9 Transportation Impact Fee Comparison Land Use Date of Last U•date Indian River County_ Unit(1) zAffordable a) Calculated''Growthl3) Staff 2013 2013 2013 2009 Brevard Adopted d P County Feels) 2009 2000 Okeechobee St. Lucie Charlotte Citrus Collier Hernando Highlands Martin St. Johns n) BI 91 uo) hu hzI hsl hal County(15) County County County County County County County County County 2012 2009 2009 2010 2010 2013 2006 2012 2011 Adoption Percentage 100% n/a n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 100% 44% 10094 100% 100% Residential: 11111111111.1 Single Family (2,000 sf) du $4,248 $4,248 $4,248 $4,483 $4,353 $963 $4,235 $6,711 $1,985 $5,753 $2,537 $6,594 $2,815 $4,408 Non -Residential: Light Industrial 1,000sf $2,681 $1,206 $1,206 $2,404 n/a $473 $390 $4,904 $628 $4,333 $1,611 $4,663 $1,857 $1,522 Office (50,000sgft) 1,000sf $4,257 $1,916 $1,916 $3,798 $5,058 $1,091 $1,287 $2,601 $1,803 $9,291 $3,031 $12,380 $2,198 $2,132 Retail (100,000sgft) 1,000sf $6,360 $2,862 $2,862 $3,163 $5,270 $1,194 $2,503 $9,717 $1,487 $10,980 $3,769 $9,821 $5,183 $3,777 Bankw/Drive-Thru 1,000sf $13,820 $6,219 $6,219 $13,02 $23,331 $1,194 $2,503 $19,222 $1,487 $21,954 $8,514 $44,926 $6,841 $9,501 Fast Food w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $45,464 $20,459 $20,459 $34,781 $35,791 $2,829 $2,503 $15,967 $1,487 $74,793 $34,795 4100,808 $15,693 $9,086 (1) Du = dwelling unit (2) Source: Table IX -7 (3) Source: Table IX -8 (4) Source: Table IX -8; Indian River County Staff recommends charging the affordable growth fee rates (5) Source: Indian River County. Fees do not include the administrative fee (6) Source: Brevard County Planning & Development Department. Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through March 2014 (7) Source: Okeechobee County Board of County Commissioners Administration Department (8) Source: St. Lucie County Ordinance Planning & Development Services Department; Average of four impact fee districts (9) Source: Charlotte County Community Development Department; Average of three impact fee districts (10) Source: Citrus County Planning & Development Department (11) Source: Collier County Impact Fee Administration Department (12) Source: Hernando County Planning & Development Department; Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through August 2014 (13) Source: Highlands County Code of Ordinances, Section 13-28; Transportation impact fee moratorium in effect through June 2014 (14) Source: Martin County Growth Management Department (15) Source: St. Johns County Planning & Zoning Department Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County lune 2014 126 Impact Fee Update Study 6 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study X. Educational Facilities Educational facilities impact fees are used to fund the capital construction and expansion of land, facilities and capital equipment required to support the additional school facilities demand created by new growth. This section presents the results of the educational facilities impact fee update study for Indian River County and will serve as the technical support document for the calculated school impact fee schedule. There are several major elements associated with the development of the educational facilities impact fee. These include: • Facility Inventory • Service Area and Enrollment • Facility Service Delivery • Cost Component • Credit Component • Net Impact Cost per Student • Student Generation Rate • Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule • Affordable Growth Strategy • Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison Facility Inventory The Indian River County School District provides public education facilities that are available to all school-age residents of Indian River County. As such, this analysis will consider all public elementary, middle, and high school level facilities and the students attending these facilities located throughout and living within Indian River County. The District currently operates 19 traditional public schools that serve the students of Indian River County and its municipalities, including 13 elementary schools, 4 middle schools, and 2 high schools. The District's current traditional school inventory (excluding charter, alternative or adult education) is provided in Appendix G, Table G-1. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 127 Impact Fee Update Study t 42, Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Service Area and Enrollment The Indian River County School District provides public education facilities that are available to all Pre -Kindergarten thru 12th grade (PK -12) students throughout the entire county. Attendance boundaries can be redrawn to balance school enrollment with available school capacity and therefore can serve different geographic areas over time. As such, the appropriate impact fee district for public schools is countywide. Table X-1 presents the historical student enrollment since 2000-01 school year and projected enrollment through 2023-24. The annual percent change for the enrollment is presented, as well as a three-year average to account for any random fluctuations. Table X- 1 reflects that student enrollment is expected to decline slightly over the next two years, and then stabilize and start increasing as of 2016-17 school year. Table X-1 Indian River County Enrollment Department of Education (2) Percent change from one year to the next (3) Average change over the last three years Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 128 Impact Fee Update Study ) 63 School Year 2000-01 Enrollment"' 15,477 Annual % Change(Z) - Three -Year Average(3) - 2001-02 14,467 -6.5% - 2002-03 14,917 3.1% - 2003-04 15,412 3.3% - 2004-05 15,604 1.2% 2.6% 2005-06 15,901 1.9% 2.2% 2006-07 16,273 2.3% 1.8% 2007-08 16,365 0.6% 1.6% 2008-09 15,794 -3.5% -0.2% 2009-10 15,710 -0.5% -1.2% 2010-11 15,549 -1.0% -1.7% 2011-12 15,597 0.3% -0.4% 2012-13 15,541 -0.4% -0.4% 2013-14 15,424 -0.8% -0.3% 2014-15 15,303 -0.8% -0.6% 2015-16 15,245 -0.4% -0.6% 2016-17 15,294 0.3% -0.3% 2017-18 15,307 0.1% 0.0% 2018-19 15,425 0.8% 0.4% 2019-20 15,607 1.2% 0.7% 2020-21 15,859 1.6% 1.2% 2021-22 16,168 1.9% 1.6% 2022-23 16,547 2.3% 1.9% 2023-24 16,990 2.7% 2.3% (11 Source: Indian River County School District and Florida Department of Education (2) Percent change from one year to the next (3) Average change over the last three years Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 128 Impact Fee Update Study ) 63 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Facility Service Delivery The Indian River County School District inventory was reviewed and trends in the net square feet per student stations were evaluated. This review along with discussions with the District representatives suggested that the design characteristics of future facilities are likely to be consistent with the existing schools. Table X-2 illustrates the facility service delivery in Indian River County, which is 144.7 net square feet per permanent student station for elementary schools, 140.5 net square feet per permanent student station for middle schools, and 157.9 net square feet per permanent student station for high schools. The weighted average facility service delivery based on all three school types is 147.7 net square feet per permanent student station. Reference to net square feet pertains to the most recent figures published per the Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Report for the District. Table X-2 Facility Service Delivery Description Permanent Net Square Footage') Permanent Student Stations(2) Net Square Feet per Student Station(3) Elementary 1,122,710 7,761 144.7 School Type Middle 602,578 4,288 140.5 High 826,729 5,235 157.9 Total / Weighted Avg 2,552,017 17,284 147.7 (1) Source: Indian River County School District (2) Source: Indian River County School District. Indicates permanent capacity after FISH adjustment. (3) Permanent net square footage (Item 1) divided by permanent student stations (Item 2) The service delivery is based on the permanent student stations because it is the School District's policy to remove portable stations and use them only as a temporary solution. This approach is also consistent with the methodology used in the 2005 technical study, which is the basis of the current adopted impact fee schedule. Portable stations will always be used at some level since they provide valuable flexibility to address temporary increases in enrollment. The School District's policy is to provide the necessary permanent student stations in the long term. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 129 Impact Fee Update Study 1414 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component The capital costs of providing educational facilities includes three components, including the school facility cost, transportation cost, and ancillary facility costs. This section addresses each of these components. Facility Cost per Student Station The first step in determining the cost of providing public schools to Indian River County residents is to calculate the facility cost per student station. Several cost components must be considered when calculating the total cost of constructing a school, including architectural/civil design/site improvement costs; construction costs; furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FF&E) costs; and the cost to purchase the land. Each component of the school facility cost is described in more detail in the following subsections. Architectural/Civil Design/Site Improvement, Construction and FF&E Costs To determine the administration, architect/civil design/site improvement, construction, and FF&E costs associated with building a new school in Indian River County, cost information was obtained for new schools built or proposed in Indian River County. The most recent construction included Storm Grove Middle School (opened in 2009), and renovation and expansion of the Vero Beach Elementary School (opened in 2012). In addition to these schools, insurance values of the existing schools and estimates included in the Educational Plant Survey for upcoming school expansions were reviewed and supplemented with discussions with the District's representatives. Given the recent fluctuations in construction costs and the limited number of schools built in the County over the past few years, a review of schools that were built over the past five years throughout the State was conducted. This database included approximately 135 schools. Of these, approximately 20 were built in 2011. Based on this information, a construction cost of $145 per net square foot was used in the study for elementary schools, $175 per net square foot for middle schools, and $185 per net square foot for high schools, with a weighted average construction cost of $165 per net square foot for all school levels. Appendix A provides additional information on cost estimates. The architectural, civil design, site preparation (including on-site improvement and traffic control costs), and FF&E costs (including technology) are calculated based on the ratio of these costs to the construction costs observed in Indian River County and other jurisdictions. These figures were also discussed with the District representatives and are Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 130 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study estimated at 10 percent of construction for architectural/civil design costs, 10 percent for site preparation costs, and 7 percent for FF&E costs. Table X-3 presents the cost per square foot figures for the architectural/civil design/site improvement, construction, and FF&E cost components for each school type. Table X-3 also presents the weighted average figure for each cost component, based on all three school types. Land Cost For each school type, the land cost per square foot is based on a value of $50,000 per acre. This cost per acre is based on the current value of land owned by the District as well as additional analysis. This additional analysis included a countywide review of vacant land sales over the last three years and market values of all vacant land of parcels similar in size to the District's school sites. The results of the vacant land analysis confirm that the cost per acre used in the impact fee analysis is reasonable. Appendix G documents the results of the land value analysis. The land cost per square foot by school type was developed based on the acres per 1,000 permanent net square feet needed for the future schools. The resulting land cost figures for each type of school also are presented in Table X-3. Net Interest Cost When a School District issues Certificates of Participation (COP) or other types of bonds to fund additional capacity, interest costs incurred during the construction period need to be added to the school facility construction costs. The Indian River County School District has been using COPs to fund a portion of its expansion projects; however, to provide a conservative estimate, this cost is not included in the calculation. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 131 Impact Fee Update Study c Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table X-3 Facility Cost per Student Station Cost Component Net Square Feet per Student Station(1) Elementary School 144.7 Middle School 140.5 High School 157.9 Weighted Average 147.7 School Facility Cost Components: Architectural/Civil Design/Site Improvement Cost per Net Sq Ft(2) $29.00 $35.00 $37.00 $33.01 Construction Cost per Net Sq Ft(3) $145.00 $175.00 $185.00 $165.04 FF&E Cost per Net Sq Ft(4) $10.15 $12.25 $12.95 $11.55 Land Cost per Net Sq Ft(5) $11.60 $13.30 $14.50 $12.40 Total Facility Cost per Net Sq Ft(6) $195.75 $235.55 $249.45 $222.00 Total Facility Cost per Student Station(7) $28,325 $33,095 $39,388 $32,789 (1) (2) Source: Table X-2 Estimated at 20% of the construction cost based on estimates obtained from the Indian River County School District and recent cost obtained from other Florida School Districts. Detailed information on cost estimates is included in Appendix G. (3) Construction cost is estimated to range from $145 per net square foot to $185 per net square foot, based on information obtained from the Indian River County School District and recently constructed schools in other Florida jurisdictions. Detailed information on cost estimates is included in Appendix G. (4) Estimated at 7% of the construction cost based on estimates obtained from the Indian River County School District and recent cost obtained from other Florida School Districts. Detailed information on cost estimates is included in Appendix G. (5) The land cost per square foot for each school type is based on the acreage per 1,000 permanent square feet for future schools at a cost of $50,000 per acre. This cost per acre figure is based on the land value of current schools within the county and average land values for vacant land throughout the county. Further information is included in Appendix G. (6) Sum of the school facility cost per net square foot (Items 2 thru 5) (7) The net square feet per permanent student station (Item 1) multiplied by the total school facility cost per net square foot (Item 6) for each respective school type. —I Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 132 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Total Facility Cost per Student The total facility impact cost per student for each school type is based on the facility cost per student station figures derived in Table X-3, and is typically calculated by dividing the cost per student station by the ratio of current student enrollment to available capacity. The adjustment of multiplying the cost per student station by the ratio of current student enrollment to available capacity converts the cost per student station to a cost per student. In addition, this calculation accounts for the current available permanent capacity and adjusts the costs accordingly. If there is available capacity (e.g., currently more permanent student stations than students), then the total facility cost per student increases because the cost of building this additional capacity is being recouped. Similarly, if there are currently more students enrolled than available capacity, the cost per student is adjusted downward. In the case of Indian River County, although there is available capacity countywide, because the District's adopted LOS standard is 100 percent, the cost per student station calculated in Table X-3 also represents the facility cost per student. This is also appropriate because part of the available capacity is used for the Voluntary Pre -Kindergarten (VPK) students and allows for the space needed for special needs students and their aids, and therefore, is not available for additional students. Table X-4 Facility Cost per Student Calculation Step Elementary Middle High School School School Weighted Average / Total Facility Impact Cost per Student Facility Cost per Student Station(1) Adopted LOS Standard (2) Total Facility Impact Cost per Student(3) $28,325 100% $28,325 $33,095 100% $33,095 $39,388 100% $39,388 $32,789 100% $32,789 (1) Source: Table X-3 (2) Source: Indian River County School District (3) Facility cost per student stations (Item 1) multiplied by the adopted LOS standard (Item 2) Although the School District's adopted LOS standard is measured in terms of stations to enrollment ratio for planning purposes, for impact fee purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or dollar value of capital assets) per student, which reflects the capacity investment made by the School District for schools and other related Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 133 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study capital assets. This figure is shown later in this section in terms of net cost per student, which should be included in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes. Total Cost per Student In addition to the facility cost per student calculated in Table X-4, the total facility cost per student includes two additional cost components: the capital costs associated with providing transportation services and ancillary facilities. Both of these cost components are calculated on a per -student basis and are not dependent on school type. Each of these additional cost components is discussed in the following paragraphs. Transportation Costs The first additional capital cost component is the cost of providing transportation services to students. The District currently owns 111 buses used for student transportation. Of these, approximately 10 percent are equipped for handicapped students at a cost of approximately $111,000 per bus. The cost for the remaining buses is estimated at $98,000 per bus, which is consistent with bus costs observed in other school districts. The result is a total transportation capital value of $11 million. The total value of the transportation fleet is divided by the District's enrollment for schools included in Appendix G, Table G-1, as well as the District's alternative school students, as this is the total existing student population benefiting from services provided by the District's transportation fleet. The result is a cost of $709 per student for transportation services, as presented in Table X-5. Ancillary Facilities Costs The other additional capital cost component is for the ancillary facilities that are necessary for the District to provide support services for students, schools, transportation services, and administrative personnel. The District currently has approximately 85,000 net square feet of permanent ancillary facilities for transportation, maintenance, warehouse, and administrative functions. Leased facilities are not included in this square footage. Current value of each existing ancillary facility depends on the type of facility and was provided by District staff, with the weighted average value of approximately $185 per square foot. This figure is consistent with costs of similar buildings observed in other jurisdictions throughout Florida. In terms of land, the only ancillary facility that is not located on a school property is the Transportation Building, which is located on a 6 -acre parcel, valued at $155,000 according to the Property Appraiser's database. This figure is used for the additional land value for Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 134 Impact Fee Update Study 1VQ Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study ancillary facilities since the acreage associated with facilities that are located on school parcels is already accounted for as part of the school acreage. The ancillary facility cost per student is based on the existing inventory, which is valued at $15.8 million, including $15.7 million for buildings and $0.2 million for land. Based on the current enrollment, the result is a cost of $1,020 per student for ancillary facilities, as presented in Table X-5. Similar to transportation cost, the ancillary facility value is divided by the enrollment to the traditional and alternative schools to account for any administrative support provided to alternative school students at these facilities. Table X-5 Transportation Services and Ancillary Facility Cost per Student Description Figure Transportation Services Cost per Student Total Current Value of Transportation Services�1 $11,021,000 Current Enrollment(2) 15,541 Total Transportation Services Cost per Student(3) $709 Ancillary Facility Cost per Student Building Value for Ancillary Facilities(4) $15,691,885 Land Value for Ancillary Facilities(5) $155,000 Total Current Value for Ancillary Facilities(6) $15,846,885 Total Ancillary Facility Cost per Student(7) $1,020 (1) Source: Indian River County School District (2) Source: District enrollment from Table X-1 (which includes students from the schools listed in Appendix G, Table G-1) plus alternative school students. The total value of the District's transportation fleet is divided by this larger enrollment figure to account for the total student population that benefits from services provided by the District's transportation fleet. (3) Total value of transportation services (Item 1) divided by the current enrollment (Item 2) (4) Source: Indian River County School District (5) Land value for the Transportation Building. All other facilities are located on school sites. (6) Sum of the building value (Item 4) and land value (Item 5) of the District's current inventory of ancillary facilities. (7) Total value for ancillary facilities (Item 6) divided by the current enrollment (Item 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 135 Impact Fee Update Study t 7v Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Credit Component To ensure that new development is not being overcharged for construction of future student stations, any non -impact fee revenue that will be generated by new development and that will be used towards the capital expansion of school facilities must be included as a credit to reduce the total cost per student. It is important to note that a credit for educational facilities impact fees is not given for revenue generated by new development that is used for capital renovation of existing schools that does not add capacity or for maintenance or operational costs. Based on a review of the District's capacity addition expenditures over the past five years and planned expenditures over the next five years, it has been determined that revenue credits will be calculated for cash expenditures as well as debt service funding. Capital Improvement Credit The Florida Statutes authorizes several sources of revenue for school districts, such as Public Education Capital Outlay (PECO) and Capital Outlay & Debt Service (CO & DS) that can be used for the construction of capital facilities. With regard to state revenue, the District has used both PECO and CO & DS revenue sources as well as Classroom for Kids revenue over the past five years for the construction of additional permanent capacity. In addition, a portion of the local capital ad valorem tax was also used toward the construction and is programmed to be used for the upcoming expansion of Citrus Elementary School. The capital improvement revenue credit per student is calculated by dividing the total amount of capital revenue by the average enrollment during this ten-year period. As presented in Table X-6, the resulting capital improvement revenue available for the capital expansion of public schools in Indian River County $186 per student per year or $3,427 per student over the next 25 years, for non -impact fee funding. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 136 Impact Fee Update Study 171 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table X-6 Revenue Credit Project 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total CO & DS/PECO (4: Dodgertown Elementary --Addition of Cafeteria - $1,167,649 $1,167,649 Subtotal - State Revenues _ - _ - $0 $1,167,649 - - - - - - $1,167,649 L5 -Mil Local Capital Tax"): Sebastian River High School -- Addition of ROTC Facility 51,079,156 - - - - - - - - - $1,079,156 Storm Grove Middle School -- New School 5453,668 - - - - - - - - 5453,668 Dodgertown Elementary -- Addition of Cafeteria - - - 5191,023 - - - - - - 5191,023 Support Services Complex -- New Building - - - - 53,160,329 - - - - - 53,160,329 Treasure Coast Elementary Expansion I $3,157,055 $3,157,055 Citrus Elementary Expansion - - - - - - - - 53,000,000 52,300,000 55,300,000 Sebastian River High School -- Freshman Learning Ctr Classroom Bldg - - - - $3,321,009 53,321,009 Subtotal -L5 -Mil Local $1,079,156 $453,668 $0 $191,023 $6,481,338 $0 $3,157,055 - 53,000,000 $2,300,000 516,662,240 Classroom for Kids/Otherrli: Storm Grove Middle School-- New School - 58,315,310 - - - - - - - - 58,315,310 Dodgertown Elementary -- Addition of Cafeteria - - - $1,974,793 - - - - - - 51,974,793 Support Services Complex -- New Building - - - - 5198,821 - - - - - 5198,821 Sebastian River High School -- Freshman Learning Ctr Classroom Bldg;, ;, 662 850 - - - --. $662,850 Subtotal- Classroom for Kids/Other - $8,315,310 - $1,974,793 $861,671 - - - - - $11,151,774 Total Expenditures $1,079,156 $8,768,978 $0 53,333,465 $7,343,009 - - - 53,000,000 $2,300,000 $28,981,663 Average Annual Expenditureslzl 52,898,166 Average Enrollment131 15,582 Revenue Credit per Student(4) $186 Capitalization Rate(5) 2.5% Capitalization Period, Years(6) 25 Present Value of Capital Improvement Revenue Credit per Student") $3,427 (1) Source: Indian River County School District (2) Total expenditures divided by 10 years to calculate the average annual expenditures (3) Source: Table X-1 (4) Average annual expenditures (Item 2) divided by the average enrollment (Item 3) (5) Interest rate the District is likely to pay for future bonds, estimated based on discussions with the District and County representatives (6) Time period after which major repairs are needed (7) Present value of revenue credit per student (Item 4) at 2.5% interest rate (Item 5) over a 25 -year capitalization period (Item 6) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 137 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Debt Service Credit per Student The District has been using COPs and other types of bonds to pay for a portion of the capacity expansion projects. Given that there is still an outstanding debt service on these, a credit is calculated for future debt service payments related to capacity expansion projects. In cases where the distribution of bond funding for capacity expansion versus replacement/renovation projects was not available, it was assumed that the entire amount was used for capacity expansion projects, which results in a generous credit and a conservative impact fee. The District uses local capital outlay millage and federal subsidies to pay the debt service. A revenue credit is calculated for the remaining portion of each outstanding COP/bond issue used to fund capacity expansion projects. The remaining payments were brought back to present value, based on the remaining number of years and annual interest rate of each respective issue. As presented in Table X-7, the debt service credit is $6,977 per student. Table X-7 Debt Service Credit per Student Number of Present Value Remaining Average Debt Service Years of of Total Description Payments Due Annual Credit per Remaining Remaining (1( for Expansion( Z( Payments Payments (3) Enrollment(') Student(5) Certificates of Participation 2005 COPS Issue 12 $75,408,441 $57,465,002 15,861 $3,623 2007 COPS Issue 14 $55,753,771 $38,059,999 16,083 $2,366 2005 COBI 14 $1,373,338 $970,000 16,083 $60 2008 COBI 11 $5,450,594 $4,305,000 15,900 $271 2010 COBI 16 $194,350 $139,999 16,457 $9 2010 QSCB Issue 15 $16,259,236 $10,589,769 16,352 $648 Total COPs Debt Service Credit per Student $6,977 (1), (2) Source: Indian River County School District (3) Present value of the total remaining payments due, based on the interest rate of each payment and the number of years of remaining payments. (4) Source: Table X-1. Enrollment for 2017 through 2025 is based on projections obtained from the Florida Department of Education, and afterwards based on a 1% annual growth. (5) Present value of total remaining payments (Item 3) divided by the average annual enrollment over the life of the remaining payments (Item 4) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 138 Impact Fee Update Study r73 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Net Impact Cost per Student The net impact fee per student is the difference between the cost component and the credit component. Table X-8 summarizes the three-step process used to calculate the net impact cost per student for public schools in Indian River County. First, the total impact cost per student is determined. This is the sum of the weighted average facility impact cost per student from Table X-4 and the transportation and ancillary facility cost components per student from Table X-5. Second, the total revenue credit is determined. This is the sum of the capital improvement revenue credit per student from Table X-6 and the debt service revenue credit per student from Table X-7. Third, the net impact cost per student is determined, which is the difference between the total impact cost per student and total revenue credit per student. The resulting figure of $24,114 per student is also the relevant measure of LOS for impact fee calculation purposes. Table X-8 Net Impact Cost per Student Total Impact Cost Facility Impact Costl' Per Student $32,789 Transportation Impact Cost(2) $709 Ancillary Facility Cost(3) $1,020 Total Impact Cost per Student(4) Revenue Credit Capital Improvement Credit(5) $34,518 Per Student $3,427 Debt Service Credit(6) $6,977 Total Revenue Credit per Student(7) Net Impact Cost Net Impact Cost per Student(8) $10,404 Per Student $24,114 (1) Source: Table X-4 (2) Source: Table X-5 (3) Source: Table X-5 (4) Sum of the facility impact cost (Item 1), the transportation impact cost (Item 2), and the ancillary facility cost (Item 3) (5) Source: Table X-6 (6) Source: Table X-7 (7) Sum of the capital improvement credit (Item 5) and the debt service credit (Item 6) (8) Total impact cost per student (Item 4) less total revenue credit per student (Item 7) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 139 Impact Fee Update Study 1 7 i4 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Student Generation Rate The number of students living in a household typically varies depending on the type of residential housing. Therefore, school impact fees are typically assessed based on the specific student generation rates for different types of residential land uses. Indian River County's current school impact fee developed the student generation rates using Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) and Census 2000 data. This impact fee study employs a new methodology using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to develop the student generation rate for Indian River County. Specifically, GIS was used to link student addresses to parcels in the Indian River County Property Appraiser's database in order to generate the number of students per unit by school type and land use based on the latest tax roll. Indian River County School District and Indian River County worked together to provide a geocoded student addresses. This file was then linked to the addresses of students who attend those schools listed in Appendix G, Table G-1. Results of this analysis are provided in Table X-9. Table X-9 Student Generation Rates Total Residential Land Use Housing Number of UnitsIll Students(2) Students per Unit(3) Traditional Schools Single Family 51,423 12,979 0.252 Multi -Family 17,277 1,712 0.099 Mobile Home 4,836 733 0.152 Total/Weighted Average 73,536 15,424 0.210 (1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser for single family/multi- family homes and the American Census Survey, 2012 Estimates, for mobile homes (2) Source: Indian River County School District and Indian River County (3) Number of students (Item 2) divided by the number of units (Item 1) for each residential land use type. As presented, student generation rates are calculated at 0.252 students per home for single family homes, 0.099 students for multi -family units, and 0.152 students for mobile homes, for a weighted average of 0.210 students per home. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 140 Impact Fee Update Study 175- Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule To determine the calculated school impact fee for each residential land use under each fee schedule scenario, the net impact cost per student is multiplied by the student generation rate. The resulting impact fee levels are presented in Table X-10. Table X-10 Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Land Use Students Unit per Unit(1) Net Impact Cost per Student(2) Total Impact Fee (3) Current Adopted Fee(4) Percent Changes) Single Family Multi -Family Mobile Home du du du 0.252 0.099 0.152 $24,114 $24,114 $24,114 $6,077 $2,387 $3,665 $1,756 $500 $623 246% 377% 488% (1) Source: Table X-9 (2) Source: Table X-8 (3) Students per unit (Item 1) multiplied by the net impact cost per student (Item 2) (4) Source: Indian River County Planning Division (5) Percent change from the current adopted fee (Item 6) to the total impact fee (Item 5) Affordable Growth Strategy Based on the data shown in Tables X-6 and X-7, the School District uses approximately $3 million per year of non -impact fee funding for school capacity projects and $12 million per year to pay off the debt service, for a total of $15 million per year. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure X-1 presents how impact fee levels would change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents the maximum legally acceptable fee. This level is compared investment needed to maintain the current LOS. Given that the available non- impact fee funding, the District could adopt the impact fee at approximately 28 percent and still maintain the current LOS as long as the non -impact fee contributions indicated above continue and the annual growth rate remains at or below 1.4 percent. However, with the School Board's input, the County has the legal right to adopt the fees at any level less than the full calculated amount shown in Table X-10. It is important to note this is a countywide - calculation and does not take into consideration capacity needs in sub -areas of the county, such as Fellsmere and North County, where schools are overcrowded. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 141 Impact Fee Update Study (74 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Figure X-1 Educational Facilities Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Approach 160% 140% 120% 60% 40% 20% 28% 0% f IRC Annual Average Growth —Total Cost —Maximum Impact Fee —LOS Curve 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.0096 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% Annual Growth Rate Table X-11 presents the calculated impact fee using the 28 -percent adoption ratio. Under this scenario, the fees would range from $668 for a multi -family home to $1,702 for a single family home. Table X-11 Calculated Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule–Affordable Growth Affordable Current Total Impact Growth (�) Adopted Adoption Ratel' e Fee(3) Percent Change(4) Residential: Single Family Multi -Family Mobile Home du du du 28% 28% 28% $1,702 $668 $1,026 $1,756 $500 $623 -3.1% 33.7% 64.7% (1) (2) (3) (4) Source: Figure X-1 Total impact fee from Table X-10 (Item 5) multiplied by the affordable growth adoption rate (Item 1) Source: Indian River County Planning Division Percent change from the current adopted fee (Item 2) to the total impact fee (Item 1) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 142 Impact Fee Update Study /77 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Staff Recommended Fee Rate In the case of educational facilities impact fees, the County staff recommends implementing the affordable growth fees. Educational Facilities Impact Fee Schedule Comparison As part of the work effort in updating Indian River County's school impact fee program, a comparison of the calculated single family school impact fee for IRC to the single family school impact fees adopted by other counties throughout Florida has been prepared. Table X-12 presents this comparison. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 143 Impact Fee Update Study 173 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table X-12 Comparison of School Impact Fee Schedules County(1) Indian River County (Aff. Growth) Date of Last Update 2013 Adoption Percentage 28% Adopted Single Family Impact Fee (2) $1,702 Indian River County (2009 Adopted) 2005 100% $1,756 Palm Beach County 2012 26% $1,866 Citrus County 2010 50% $1,936 Sarasota County* 2007 n/a $2,032 Lake County 2011 25% $2,573 Volusia County 2013 67% $3,000 Flagler County 2004 76% $3,600 Marion County* 2006 100% $3,967 Hillsborough County 2006 n/a $4,000 Polk County 2010 44% $4,160 Hernando County* 2005 100% $4,266 Brevard County 2004 100% $4,445 Pasco County 2007 47% $4,876 Seminole County 2007 99% $5,000 Collier County 2011 50% $5,378 Martin County 2008 100% $5,567 Highlands County* 2006 100% $5,801 St. Johns County 2011 100% $6,072 Indian River County (Calculated) 2013 100% $6,077 St. Lucie County n/a 100% $6,091 Broward County 2008 100% $6,267 Orange County 2011 50% $6,525 Manatee County 2005 100% $6,572 Clay County 2005 n/a $7,034 Osceola County 2012 90% $8,724 (1) County's tagged with an asterisk (*) have fees that are currently suspended (2) Source: Published impact fee schedules and discussions with representatives from each County and Tables X-10 and X-11 for Indian River County figures (3) Represents the full calculated fee for each jurisdiction. Note: The fees for Manatee County and Volusia County include a 3.0% administrative fee Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 144 Impact Fee Update Study 174 Appendix A Population 1go Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Population All impact fee program areas (except for educational facilities and transportation) require the use of population data in calculating current levels -of -service, performance standards, and future demand for capital facilities. With this in mind, a consistent approach to developing population estimates and projections is an important component of the data compilation process. To accurately determine demand for services, as well as to be consistent with Indian River County's Comprehensive Plan, not only the residents, or permanent population of the County, but also the seasonal residents and visitors were considered. Seasonal residents include visitors to hotel and motel facilities, visitors to RV parks, visitors that stay with relatives and friends, and part-time residents, which are defined as living in Indian River County for less than six months each year. Therefore, for purposes of calculating future demand for capital facilities for each impact fee program area, the weighted average seasonal population will be used in all population estimates and projections. References to population contained in this report pertain to the weighted average seasonal population, unless otherwise noted. Indian River County provides all of the services areas included in the impact fee program countywide, with the exception of the following three program areas: • Law enforcement, which is provided in unincorporated county; • Parks and recreation services, also provided only in unincorporated county; and • Emergency services, which are provided countywide with the exception of the Town of Indian River Shores. Given the differences in services areas, population estimates are provided separately for these three areas. Table A-1 presents the population trend for Indian River County. The projections indicate that the population of Indian River County is estimated to increase by 40 percent between 2013 and 2040 countywide. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-1 Impact Fee Update Study 1$i Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-1 Weighted Population Trends and Projections Year 2000 Weighted Indian River County (1) 119,351 Seasonal Population Unincorporated Indian River County( 2) Figure IRC, Excluding Indian River Shores (3) 115,707 75,723 2001 121,732 77,277 118,028 2002 124,110 78,824 120,426 2003 126,869 80,523 123,128 2004 131,175 84,000 127,403 2005 134,573 86,741 130,792 2006 139,121 89,255 135,292 2007 143,177 92,824 139,413 2008 145,212 93,905 141,287 2009 145,356 94,014 141,452 2010 145,854 96,546 141,732 2011 146,325 96,955 142,202 2012 147,118 97,461 142,966 2013 148,001 97,681 143,561 2014 148,964 98,316 144,495 2015 150,081 99,053 145,578 2016 151,175 99,776 146,640 2017 152,612 100,724 148,034 2018 154,214 101,781 149,588 2019 155,911 102,901 151,234 2020 157,705 104,085 152,974 2021 159,470 105,250 154,686 2022 161,463 106,566 156,619 2023 163,563 107,951 158,656 2024 165,771 109,409 160,797 2025 168,091 110,940 163,049 2026 170,444 112,493 165,330 2027 172,950 114,147 167,761 2028 175,526 115,848 170,261 2029 178,124 117,562 172,780 2030 180,743 119,290 175,320 2031 183,381 121,032 177,880 2032 186,031 122,781 180,450 2033 188,710 124,549 183,049 2034 191,428 126,342 185,685 2035 194,165 128,149 188,340 2036 196,923 129,969 191,015 2037 199,699 131,801 193,708 2038 202,495 133,647 196,420 2039 205,289 135,491 199,131 2040 208,079 137,332 201,837 1) Source: Appendix A, Table A-18 (2) Source: Appendix A, Table A-21 (3) Source: Appendix A, Table A-24 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County A-2 Impact Fee Update Study j$2 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Apportionment of Demand by Residential Unit Type and Size The residential land uses to be used for the impact fee calculations are the following: • Single Family • Multi-Family/Accessory Unit • Mobile Home/RV (tied down) Table A-2 presents the number of residents per housing unit for the residential categories identified above in Indian River County. This analysis includes all housing units, both occupied and vacant. To address fairness and equity issues between land uses and to be consistent with the County's current fee schedules, the single family land use is tiered based on four categories of square footage: less than 1,000 square feet, 1,000 to 1,499 square feet, 1,500 to 2,499 square feet, and 2,500 square feet or greater. To accommodate the tiering of impact fee assessments for the single family residential land use category, an analysis was completed based on housing unit size and persons per housing unit. This analysis utilized national data from the 2011 American Housing Survey (AHS) and date from the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census Reports to examine this relationship. Because the 2010 Census data do not provide population by land use, a comparison of weighted average population per housing units between the two Census data sets was conducted and the resulting ratio was applied to the residents per housing unit figure for each land use. Table A-2 Residents per Housing Unit (Countywide) Housing Type Single Family (detached) Population�l1 83,498 Housing Units�Z� Ratio(3) 34,383 Residents / Housin g Units( 2.43 Residents / HousingUnits with 2010Adj(5) 2.26 - Less than 1,000 sf 87% 2.11 1.97 - 1,000 to 1,499 sf 94% 2.28 2.12 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf 100% 2.43 2.26 - 2,500 sf or greater 111% 2.70 2.52 Multi-Family/Accessory 22,768 16,649 1.37 1.28 Mobile Home 10,516 6,786 1.55 1.44 Weighted Average 116,782 57,818 2.02 1.88 (1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonal population) (2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30 (3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey (4) Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item 2) (5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County A-3 Impact Fee Update Study IY3 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-3 Residents per Housing Unit (Unincorporated IRC) Housing Type Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf - 1,000 to 1,499sf - 1,500 to 2,499 sf - 2,500 sf or greater Multi-Family/Accessory Mobile Home Weighted Average Populationi'i 52,420 Housing Units(2) 20,997 14,195 7,454 74,069 9,923 5,378 36,298 Ratio 87% 94% 100% Residents / Housing Units(4) 2.50 2.18 2.35 2.50 2.78 1.43 1.39 2.04 Residents / Housing Units with 2010 Adjisi 2.33 2.03 2.19 2.33 2.59 1.33 1.30 1.90 (1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonal population) (2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30 (3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey (4) Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item 2) (5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 Table A-4 • Kesuaents per Housing unit (IKC. exciuding Inman River snores) Housing Type Single Family (detached) it 81,290 Housing Units(2) 33,010 Ratio(3) Residents / Housing Units(4) 2.46 Residents / HousingUnits with 2010Adjisi 2.29 - Less than 1,000 sf 87% 2.14 1.99 -1,000 to 1,499 sf 94% 2.31 2.15 -1,500 to 2,499 sf 100% 2.46 2.29 - 2,500 sf or greater 111% 2.73 2.54 Multi-Family/Accessory 21,493 15,176 1.42 1.32 Mobile Home 10,516 6,786 1.55 1.44 Weighted Average 113,299 54,972 2.06 1.92 (1) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-33 (adjusted for peak seasonal population) (2) Source: 2000 Census, Table H-30 (3) Ratios developed based on national PPH data derived from the 2011 American Housing Survey (4) Population (Item 1) divided by housing units (Item 2) (5) Residents per housing unit based on Census 2000 are adjusted downward by 6.8 percent to reflect the decrease in people per housing unit between 2000 and 2010 Functional Population Functional population, as used in the impact fee analysis, is a generally accepted methodology for several impact fee areas and is based on the assumption that demand for certain facilities is generally proportional to the presence of people at a land use, including residents, employees, and visitors. It is not enough to simply add resident population to the Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-4 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study number of employees, since the service -demand characteristics can vary considerably by type of industry. Functional population is the equivalent number of people occupying space within a community on a 24 -hour -day, 7 -days -a -week basis. A person living and working in the community will have the functional population coefficient of 1.0. A person living in the community but working elsewhere may spend only 16 hours per day in the community on weekdays and 24 hours per day on weekends for a functional population coefficient of 0.76 (128 -hour presence divided by 168 hours in one week). A person commuting into the county to work five days per week would have a functional population coefficient of 0.30 (50 -hour presence divided by 168 hours in one week). Similarly, a person traveling into the community to shop at stores, perhaps averaging 8 hours per week, would have a functional population coefficient of 0.05. Functional population thus tries to capture the presence of all people within the community, whether residents, workers, or visitors, to arrive at a total estimate of effective population need to be served. This form of adjusting population to help measure real facility needs replaces the population approach of merely weighting residents two-thirds and workers one-third (Nelson and Nicholas 1992). By estimating the functional and weighted population per unit of land use across all major land uses in a community, an estimate of the demand for certain facilities and services in the present and future year can be calculated. The following paragraphs explain how functional population is calculated for residential and non-residential land uses. Residential Functional Population Developing the residential component of functional population is simpler than developing the non-residential component. It is generally estimated that people spend one-half to three-fourths of their time at home and the rest of each 24-hour day away from their place of residence. In developing the residential component of the Indian River County functional population, an analysis of the County's population and employment characteristics was conducted. Based on this analysis, it was estimated that people, on average, spend 16.4 hours, or approximately 68 percent, of each 24-hour day at their place of residence and the other 32 percent away from home. This analysis is presented in Tables A-5 and A-6. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-5 Impact Fee Update Study $s Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-5 Indian River County Population & Employment Characteristics Item/Calculation Step Workers who live and work in Indian River County (2010)(1) Figure 47,755 Workers who live in Indian River County but work elsewhere (2010)(1) 8,560 Total workers living in Indian RiverCounty(2) 56,315 Indian River County Census Population (2010)(3) 138,028 Total workers as a percent of population(4) 40.8% School age population (5-17 years) (2010)(5) 19,444 School age population as a percent of population(6) 14.1% Population net of workers and school age population(') 62,269 Other population as a percent of total population(8) 45.1% '11 Source: Estimated based on data from the 2010 U.S. Census and the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Census Transportation Planning Package (CTOO) Pt. 3 (2) Sum of workers who live/work in IRC and workers who live elsewhere but work in IRC (3) Source: 2010 U.S. Census (4) Total workers living in IRC (Item 2) divided by the census population (Item 3) (5) Source: 2010 U.S. Census (6) School age population (Item 5) divided by the census population (Item 3) (7) Census population (Item 3) less total workers living in Indian River County (Item 2) and school age population (Item 5) (8) Population net of worker and school age population (Item 7) divided by census population (Item 3) Table A-6 Residential Coefficient for Functional Population Hours at Percent of Effective Pop. Group Residence()) Population(2) Hours(3) Workers 13 40.8% 5.3 Students 15 14.1% 2.1 Other 20 45.1% 9.0 Total Hours at Residence(4) 16.4 Residential Functional Population Coefficient(5) 68.3% (1) Source: Assumed (2) Source: Table A-5 (3) Hours at residence (Item 1) multiplied by percent of population (Iterr (4) Sum of effective hours (Item 3) (5) Total hours at residence (Item 4) divided by 24 2) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County A-6 Impact Fee Update Study 181. Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study The resulting percentage from Table A-6 is used in the calculation of the residential coefficient for the 24-hour functional population. These actual calculations are presented in Table A-8. Non -Residential Functional Population Given the varying characteristics of non-residential land uses, developing the estimates of functional residents for non-residential land uses is more complicated than developing estimated functional residents for residential land uses. Nelson and Nicholas originally introduced a method for estimating functional resident population, now used internationally'. This method uses trip generation data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual and TOA's Trip Characteristics Database, information of passengers per vehicle, workers per vehicle, length of time spent at the land use, and other variables. Specific calculations include: • Total one-way trips per employee (ITE trips multiplied by 50 percent to avoid double counting entering and exiting trips as two trips). • Visitors per impact unit based on occupants per vehicle (trips multiplied by occupants per vehicle less employees). • Worker hours per week per impact unit (such as nine worker -hours per day multiplied by five days in a work week). • Visitor hours per week per impact unit (visitors multiplied by number of hours per day times relevant days in a week, such as five for offices and seven for retail shopping). • Functional population coefficients per employee developed by estimating time spent by employees and visitors at each land use. Table A-7 also shows the functional population coefficients for non-residential uses in Indian River County. The functional population coefficients in Table A-7 were used to estimate the County's functional population in Table A-8. 1 Arthur C. Nelson and James C. Nicholas, "Estimating Functional Population for Facility Planning," Journal of Urban Planning and Development 118(2): 45-58 (1992) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-7 Impact Fee Update Study 187 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Table A-7 General Functional Population Coefficients Employee One -Way Journey -to- Daily Population/ Trips per Visitors per Visitor Hours ITE WC Hours In -Trips per Work Occupants Occupants per Employment Category Itl Employeelzl pl Employeeper Trip"' Pace Employee per Tripla) TripIsl Population Days per Weekl'1 7.00 Functional Population Coefficient Ip 0.683 Natural Resources n/a 9.00 3.02 1.51 1.32 1.38 0.09 1.00 7.00 0.379 Construction 110 9.00 3.02 1.51 1.32 1.38 0.09 1.00 5.00 0.271 Manufacturing 140 9.00 2.13 1.07 1.32 1.38 0.06 1.00 5.00 0.270 Transportation, Communication, Utilities 110 9.00 3.02 1.51 1.32 1.38 0.09 L00 5.00 0.271 Wholesale Trade 150 9.00 3.89 1.95 1.32 1.38 0.12 1.00 5.00 0.271 Retail Trade 820 9.00 52.10 26.05 1.24 1.73 12.76 1.50 7.00 1.173 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 710 9.00 3.32 1.66 1.24 1.73 0.81 1.00 5.00 0.292 Services191 n/a 9.00 28.62 14.31 1.24 1.73 7.01 1.00 6.00 0.572 Governmentl10l 730 9.00 11.95 5.98 1.24 1.73 2.93 1.00 7.00 0.497 (1) Assumed (2) Trips per employee represents all trips divided by the number of employees and is based on Trip Generation 9th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers 2012) as follows: ITE Code 110 at 3.02 weekday trips per employee, page 93. ITE Code 140 at 2.13 weekday trips per employee, page 164. ITE Code 150 at 3.89 weekday trips per employee, page 193. ITE Code 710 at 3.32 weekday trips per employee, page 1252. ITE Code 730 at 11.95 weekday trips per employee, page 1304. ITE Code 820 based on blended average of trips by retail center size calculated below, adapted from page 1561. Trips per retail employee from the following table: Assumed Sq Ft per Trips per Weighted Retail Scale Center Size Trip Rate Employee" Employee Share Trips Neighborhood <50k sq.ft. 50 86.56 802 69 40.0% 27.60 Community 50k -250k sq.ft. 250 49.28 975 48 30.0% 14.40 Regional 250k -500k sq.ft. 500 38.66 1,043 40 20.0% 8.00 Super Reg. 500k -1000k sq.ft 1,000 3033 676 21 10.0% 2.10 Sum of Weighted Trips/1k sq.fL 52.10 (3) Trip per employee (Item 2) multiplied by 0.5. (4) Journey -to -Work Occupants per Trip from 2001 Nationwide Household Travel Survey (FHWA 2001) as follows: 1.32 occupants per Construction, Manufacturing, TCU, and Wholesale trip 1.24 occupants per Retail Trade, FIRE, and Services trip (5) Daily Occupants per Trip from 2001 Nationwide Household Travel Survey (FHWA 2001) as follows: 1.38 occupants per Construction, Manufacturing, TCU, and Wholesale trip 1.73 occupants per Retail Trade, FIRE, and Services trip (6) [Daily occupants per trip (Item 5) multiplied by one-way trips per employee (Item 3)1- [(Journey -to -Work occupants per trip (Item 4) multi plied by one-way trips per employee (Item 3)1 (7) Typical number of days per week that indicated Industries provide services and relevant government services are available. (8) Table A-6 for residential and the equation below to determine the Functional Population Coefficient per Employee for all land -use categories except residential includes the following: [(Daus oer Weekx Employee Hours in Place) + (Visitors orr Fmolovee x Visitor Hours oer Trio x Days oer Week), (24 Hours per Day x 7 Days per Week) (9) Trips per employee for the services category Is the average trips per employee for the following service related land use categories: quality restaurant, high -turnover restaurant, supermarket, hotel, motel, elementary school, middle school, high school, hospital, medical office, and church. Source for the trips per employee figure front ITE, 9th ed., when available, or else derived from the square feet per employee for the appropriate land use category front the Energy Information Administration from Table B-1 of the Commercial Energy Building Survey (2003). (10) Includes Federal Civilian Government, Federal Mi I ita ry Government, and State and Local Government categories. (11) Square feet per retail employee from the Energy Information Administration from Table B-1 of the Commercial Energy Building Survey, 2003 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Oro 00 A-8 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-8 Countywide Functional Population — Year 2013 Indian River County Population Category Baseline Data 2013 Weighted Population 148,001 Functional Resident Functional Coefficient(2) Population(3) 0.683 101,085 Employment Category Natural Resources 4,228 0.379 1,602 Construction 3,560 0.271 965 Manufacturing 2,480 0.270 670 Transportation, Communication, and Utilities 1,876 0.271 508 Wholesale Trade 926 0.271 251 Retail Trade 9,526 1.173 11,174 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 8,066 0.292 2,355 Services 32,704 0.572 18,707 Government Services 5,772 0.497 2,869 Total Employment by Category Population(4) 39,101 2013 Total Functional Population(5) 140,186 (1) (2) (3) Source: Table A-1 for population and 2013 Woods & Poole for employment data Source: Table A-7 The functional population is Indian River County baseline data (Item 1) multiplied by the functional resident coefficient (Item 2) (4) The total employment population by category is the sum of the employment figures from the nine employment categories (e.g., natural resources, construction, etc.) (5) The total functional population is the sum of the residential functional population (101,085) and employment functional population (39,101) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-9 Impact Fee Update Study t8a Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-9 Unincorporated County Functional Population — Year 2013 Indian River County Population Category Baseline Data(1) 2013 Weighted Population 97,681 Functional Resident Functional Coefficient(2) Population(3) 0.683 66,716 Employment Category Natural Resources 2,832 0.379 1,073 Construction 1,730 0.271 469 Manufacturing 1,661 0.270 448 Transportation, Communication, and Utilities 1,256 0.271 340 Wholesale Trade 560 0.271 152 Retail Trade 5,766 1.173 6,764 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 3,919 0.292 1,144 Services 15,891 0.572 9,090 Government Services 2,805 0.497 1,394 Total Employment by Category Population(4) 20,874 2013 Total Functional Population(5) 87,590 (1) (2) (3) Source: Table A-1 for population and 2013 Woods & Poole for employment data Source: Table A-7 The functional population is Indian River County baseline data (Item 1) multiplied by the functional resident coefficient (Item 2) (4) The total employment population by category is the sum of the employment figures from the nine employment categories (e.g., natural resources, construction, etc.) (5) The total functional population is the sum of the residential functional population (66,716) and employment functional population (20,874) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-10 Impact Fee Update Study 1Qa Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-10 IRC excluding Indian River Shores Functional Population — Year 2013 Indian River County Population Category Baseline Data(1) 2013 Weighted Population 143,561 Functional Resident Functional Coefficient(2) Population(3) 0.683 98,052 Employment Category Natural Resources 4,189 0.379 1,588 Construction 3,469 0.271 940 Manufacturing 2,457 0.270 663 Transportation, Communication, and Utilities 1,859 0.271 504 Wholesale Trade 912 0.271 247 Retail Trade 9,387 1.173 11,011 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 7,859 0.292 2,295 Services 31,867 0.572 18,228 Government Services 5,624 0.497 2,795 Total Employment by Category Population(4) 38,271 2013 Total Functional Population(s) 136,323 (1) (2) (3) Source: Table A-1 for population and 2013 Woods & Poole for employment data Source: Table A-7 The functional population is Indian River County baseline data (Item 1) multiplied by the functional resident coefficient (Item 2) (4) The total employment population by category is the sum of the employment figures from the nine employment categories (e.g., natural resources, construction, etc.) The total functional population is the sum of the residential functional population (98,052) and employment functional population (38,271) (5) Table A-11 presents the County's annual functional population figures from 2000 through 2040, based on the 2013 functional population figures from Tables A-8 through A-10 and the annual population growth rates from the population figures previously presented in Table A-1. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-11 Impact Fee Update Study 141 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-11 Indian River County Functional Population (2000-2040) Year 2000 Indian River County(1) 113,139 Functional Population Unincorporated Indian River County1�1 70,691 IRC Excluding Indian RiverShoresl3l 110,023 2001 115,402 72,105 112,223 2002 117,710 73,547 114,467 2003 120,300 75,165 116,985 2004 124,390 77,721 120,962 2005 127,624 79,742 124,107 2006 131,963 82,453 128,327 2007 135,790 84,844 132,048 2008 137,691 86,032 133,897 2009 137,829 86,118 134,031 2010 138,242 86,376 134,433 2011 138,657 86,635 134,836 2012 139,350 87,068 135,510 2013 140,186 87,590 136,323 2014 141,167 88,203 137,277 2015 142,155 88,820 138,238 2016 143,150 89,442 139,206 2017 144,582 90,336 140,598 2018 146,172 91,330 142,145 2019 147,780 92,335 143,709 2020 149,553 93,443 145,434 2021 151,198 94,471 147,034 2022 153,164 95,699 148,945 2023 155,155 96,943 150,881 2024 157,172 98,203 152,842 2025 159,372 99,578 154,982 2026 161,603 100,972 157,152 2027 164,027 102,487 159,509 2028 166,487 104,024 161,902 2029 168,984 105,584 164,331 2030 171,519 107,168 166,796 2031 174,092 108,776 169,298 2032 176,529 110,299 171,668 2033 179,000 111,843 174,071 2034 181,506 113,409 176,508 2035 184,047 114,997 178,979 2036 186,624 116,607 181,485 2037 189,237 118,239 184,026 2038 191,886 119,894 186,602 2039 194,572 121,573 189,214 2040 197,296 123,275 191,863 (1) Source: Table A-8 for 2013 total functional population (2) Source: Table A-9 for 2013 total functional population (3) Source: Table A-10 for 2013 total functional population Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County A-12 Impact Fee Update Study (Q2 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Functional Residents by Specific Land Use Category When a wide range of land uses impact services, an estimate of that impact is needed for each land use. This section presents functional population estimates by residential and non-residential land uses. Residential and Transient Land Uses As previously mentioned, the average number of persons per housing unit in Indian River County was calculated for the single family, multi -family, and mobile home/RV land uses, based on information obtained from the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census. Besides the residential land uses, the table also includes transient land uses, such as hotels, motels, nursing homes, and assisted care living facilities (ACLF). Secondary sources, such as the IRC Chamber of Commerce and the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, are used to determine the occupancy rate for hotels, motels, and nursing homes/ACLF land uses. As mentioned before, different functional population coefficients must be developed for each of the impact fee service areas to be analyzed. For residential and transient land uses, these coefficients are displayed in Tables A-12 through A-14. Non -Residential Land Uses A similar approach is used to estimate functional residents for non-residential land uses. Table A-15 reports basic assumptions and calculations, such as trips per unit, trips per employee, employees per impact unit, one-way trips per impact unit, worker hours, occupants per vehicle trip, visitors (patrons, etc.) per impact unit, visitor hours per trip, and days per week for non-residential land uses. The final column in the tables shows the estimated functional resident coefficients by land use. These coefficients by land use create the demand component for the certain impact fee programs and will be used in the calculation of the cost per unit for each land use category in the select impact fee schedules. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-13 Impact Fee Update Study )Q3 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-12 Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses - Countywide Residents/ Adjusted Peak Visitor Work Week Impact ITE Occupancy Workers Work Day Days Per Residential Land Use Visitors Per Residents Hours at Residents Per Unit LUC(") Rate(3) Per Unit(6) Hours(7l Week(e( Unit(2) Per Unit(4) Place(— Unit(9) Residential Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 210 1.97 1.35 - 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 210 2.12 1.45 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 210 2.26 1.54 -2,500sforgreater du 210 2.52 1.72 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 220 1.28 0.87 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 240 1.44 0.98 Transient, Assisted, Group Hotel room 310 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.57 9 7 0.65 Motel room 320 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.44 9 7 0.60 Nursing Home/ACLF bed 252/620 1.00 91% 0.91 16 0.84 9 7 0.92 (1) Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Enginee s (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (2) Estimates for the single family, multi -family, and mobile home land use from Table A-2, estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions. One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes. (3) Source for hotel/motel occupancy Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy rate for 2007 through 2012. Source for nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate is the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, Indian County Profile. Average occupancy rate for 2011 and 2012. (4) Residents per unit times occupancy rate (5), (7), (8) Estimated (6) Adapted from ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (9) For residential this is Residents Per Unit times 0.683. For Transient, Assisted, and Group it is. f(Adiusted Residents Der UnitX Hours at Place X Days oer Week) + (Workers Per UnitX Work Hours Per Dav X Days oer Weekll ( 24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 A-14 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-13 Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses — Unincorporated County Residents/ Adjusted Peak Visitor Work Week Impact ITE Occupancy Workers Work Day Days Per Residential Land Use Visitors Per Residents Hours at Residents Per Unit LUC1�1 Rate(3) Per Unit16I Hours() Week(8) Unit PerUnit(4I Places) Unit(9) Residential Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 210 2.03 1.39 -1,000 to 1,499 sf du 210 2.19 1.50 -1,500 to 2,499 sf du 210 2.33 1.59 - 2,500 sf or greater du 210 2.59 1.77 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 220 1.33 0.91 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 240 1.30 0.89 Transient, Assisted, Group Hotel room 310 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.57 9 7 0.65 Motel room 320 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.44 9 7 0.60 Nursing Home/ACLF bed 620 1.00 91% 0.91 16 0.84 9 7 0.92 (1) Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Enginee s (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (2) Estimates for the single family, multi -family, and mobile home land use from Table A-3; estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes. (3) Source for hotel/motel occupancy Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy rate for 2007 through the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, Indian County Profile. Average occupancy rate for 2011 and 2012. (4) Residents per unit times occupancy rate (5), (7), (8) Estimated (6) Adapted from ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (9) For residential this is Residents Per Unit times 0.683. For Transient, Assisted, and Group itis: ((Adiusted Residents per Unit X Hours at Place X Days Der Week) + (Workers Per Unit X Work Hours Per Day Days oer Week11 on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions. 2012. Source for nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate is ( 24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 A-15 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-14 Functional Residents for Residential and Transient Land Uses — IRC excluding Indian River Shores Residents/ Adjusted Peak Visitor Work Week Impact ITE Occupancy Workers Work Day Days Per Residential Land Use,,,Visitors Per Residents Hours at Residents Per Unit LUCRate(31 a Per Unit(6) Hours(7) Week(81 Unit Per Unit() Places( Unit(9) Residential Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 210 1.99 1.36 -1,000 to 1,499 sf du 210 2.15 1.47 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 210 2.29 1.56 - 2,500 sf or greater du 210 2.54 1.73 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 220 1.32 0.90 Mobile Home/RV (Tied Down) du 240 1.44 0.98 Transient, Assisted, Group Hotel room 310 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.57 9 7 0.65 Motel room 320 1.70 51% 0.87 12 0.44 9 7 0.60 Nursing Home/ACLF bed 620 1.00 91% 0.91 16 0.84 9 7 0.92 (1) Land use code from the Institute of Transportation Enginee s (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (2) Estimates for the single family, multi -family, and mobile home land use from Table A-4, estimates for the hotel/motel land use is based on data obtained from other Florida jurisdictions One person per bed is assumed for nursing homes. (3) Source for hotel/motel occupancy. Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Average hotel/motel occupancy rate for 2007 through 2012. Source for nursing home/ACLF occupancy rate is the Florida Department of Elderly Affairs, Indian County Profile. Average occupancy rate for 2011 and 2012. (4) Residents per unit times occupancy rate (5), (7), (8) Estimated (6) Adapted from ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (9) For residential this is Residents Per Unit times 0.683. For Transient, Assisted, and Group it is ((Adjusted Residents oer Unit X Hours at Place X Days oer Weekl + (Workers Per Unit X Work Hours Per Dav X Days oer Weekll ( 24 Hours per Day X 7 Days per Week) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 A-16 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-15 (continued) Functional Residents for Non -Residential Land Uses ITE LUC Itl One -Way Visitor Functional Trips Per Trips Per Employees Worker Occupants Days Per Land Use Impact Unit 3) lal Factor @ VI Visitorsle) Hours Per tol Unit(2) Employee Per Unit 50% S) Hourslel Per Trip Trip (9) Week Illi Coefficient(n) Miscellaneous 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 71.88 26.73 2.69 35.94 9 1.11 37.20 0.15 5 0.89 610 Hospital 1,000sf 13.22 4.50 2.94 6.61 9 1.42 6.45 1.00 7 1.37 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000sf 40.12 n/a 4.05 20.06 9 1.42 24.44 1.00 7 2.54 560 Church 1,000 sf 9.11 20.64 0.44 4.56 9 1.90 8.22 1.00 7 0.51 444 MovieTheaterw/Matinee screen 106.63 53.12 2.01 53.32 9 2.39 125.42 1.00 7 5.98 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student 1.29 15.71 0.08 0.65 9 1.11 0.64 2.00 5 0.06 522 Middle School (Private, 6-8) student 1.62 16.39 0.10 0.81 9 1.11 0.80 2.00 5 0.07 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 1.71 19.74 0.09 0.86 9 1.11 0.86 2.00 5 0.08 540/550 University/Junior College with 7,500 or fewer students student 2.00 12.26 0.16 1.00 9 1.11 0.95 2.00 5 0.10 n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf 5.40 n/a 0.70 2.70 9 1.20 2.54 3.50 7 0.63 Sources. (1) Land use code found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition (2) Land uses and trip generation rates consistent with those included in the 2013 Transportation Impact Fee Update Study (3) Trips per employee from ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 9th Edition, when available (4) Trips per impact unit divided by trips per person (usually employee). When trips per person are not available, the employees per unit is estimated. (5) Trips per unit (Item 2) multiplied by 50 percent (6), (9), (10) Estimated (7) Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey (8) [(One-way Trips/UnitX Occupants/Trip) - Employees]. (11) [(Workers X Hours/DayX Days/Week) + (Visitors X Hours/VisitX Days/Week)]/)24 Hours x 7 Days) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 A-18 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections (Countywide): Table A-16 Table A-17 Table A-18 IRC Permanent Population Projections IRC Seasonal Population Pro ections IRC Weighted Seasonal Population Projections Year 2000 Permanent Population 112,947 2001 115,200 2002 117,450 2003 120,062 2004 124,137 2005 127,352 2006 131,656 2007 135,494 2008 137,420 2009 137,557 2010 138,028 2011 138,694 2012 139,446 2013 140,283 2014 141,195 2015 142,254 2016 143,463 2017 144,826 2018 146,347 2019 147,957 2020 149,659 2021 151,455 2022 153,348 2023 155,342 2024 157,439 2025 159,643 2026 161,942 2027 164,323 2028 166,771 2029 169,239 2030 171,727 2031 174,234 2032 176,752 2033 179,297 2034 181,879 2035 184,480 _ 2036 187,100 2037 189,738 2038 192,394 2039 195,049 2040 197,700 Year 2000 Seasonal Population 15,248 2001 15,552 2002 15,856 2003 16,208 2004 16,758 2005 17,193 2006 17,774 2007 18,292 2008 18,552 2009 18,570 2010 18,634 2011 18,169 2012 18,267 2013 18,377 2014 18,497 2015 18,635 2016 18,363 2017 18,538 2018 18,732 2019 18,938 2020 19,156 2021 19,083 2022 19,322 2023 19,573 2024 19,837 2025 20,115 2026 20,243 2027 20,540 2028 20,846 2029 21,155 2030 21,466 2031 21,779 2032 22,094 2033 22,412 2034 22,735 2035 23,060 2036 23,388 2037 23,717 2038 24,049 2039 24,381 2040 24,713 Year 2000 Permanent Population 112,947 Seasonal Population 6,404 Total Weighted Season Pop. 119,351 2001 115,200 6,532 121,732 2002 117,450 6,660 124,110 2003 120,062 6,807 126,869 2004 124,137 7,038 131,175 2005 127,352 7,221 134,573 2006 131,656 7,465 139,121 2007 135,494 7,683 143,177 2008 137,420 7,792 145,212 2009 137,557 7,799 145,356 2010 138,028 7,826 145,854 2011 138,694 7,631 146,325 2012 139,446 7,672 147,118 2013 140,283 7,718 148,001 2014 141,195 7,769 148,964 2015 142,254 7,827 150,081 2016 143,463 7,712 151,175 2017 144,826 7,786 152,612 2018 146,347 7,867 154,214 2019 147,957 7,954 155,911 2020 149,659 8,046 157,705 _ 2021 151,455 8,015 159,470 2022 153,348 8,115 161,463 2023 155,342 8,221 163,563 2024 157,439 8,332 165,771 2025 159,643 8,448 168,091 2026 161,942 8,502 170,444 2027 164,323 8,627 172,950 2028 166,771 8,755 175,526 2029 169,239 8,885 178,124 2030 171,727 9,016 180,743 2031 174,234 9,147 183,381 2032 176,752 9,279 186,031 2033 179,297 9,413 188,710 2034 181,879 9,549 191,428 2035 184,480 9,685 194,165 2036 187,100 9,823 196,923 2037 189,738 9,961 199,699 2038 192,394 10,101 202,495 2039 195,049 10,240 205,289 2040 197,700 10,379 208,079 Notes: Table A-16: BEBR-Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates Table A-17• Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040 Table A-18: Seasonal population from Table A-17 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the year (assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months = 0.42). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-19 Impact Fee Update Study 144 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections (Unincorporated County): Table A-19 Table A-20 Table A-21 IRC Permanent Population Projections IRC Seasonal Population Pro ections IRC Weighted Seasonal Population Projections Year 2000 Permanent Population 71,660 2001 73,130 2002 74,595 2003 76,202 2004 79,493 2005 82,087 2006 84,466 2007 87,843 2008 88,866 2009 88,969 2010 91,366 2011 91,899 2012 92,378 2013 92,587 2014 93,189 2015 93,888 2016 94,686 2017 95,585 2018 96,589 2019 97,652 2020 98,775 2021 99,960 2022 101,210 2023 102,526 2024 103,910 2025 105,364 2026 106,882 2027 108,453 2028 110,069 2029 111,698 2030 113,340 2031 114,994 2032 116,656 2033 118,336 2034 120,040 2035 121,757 2036 123,486 2037 125,227 2038 126,980 2039 128,732 2040 130,482 Year 2000 Seasonal Population 9,674 2001 9,873 2002 10,070 2003 10,287 2004 10,732 2005 11,082 2006 11,403 2007 11,859 2008 11,997 2009 12,011 2010 12,334 2011 12,039 2012 12,102 2013 12,129 2014 12,208 2015 12,299 2016 12,120 2017 12,235 2018 12,363 2019 12,499 2020 12,643 2021 12,595 2022 12,752 2023 12,918 2024 13,093 2025 13,276 2026 13,360 2027 13,557 2028 13,759 2029 13,962 2030 14,167 2031 14,374 2032 14,582 2033 14,792 2034 15,005 2035 15,220 2036 15,436 2037 15,653_ 2038 15,873 2039 16,092 2040 16,310 Year 2000 Permanent Population 71,660 Seasonal Population 4,063 Total Weighted Season Pop. 75,723 2001 73,130 4,147 77,277 2002 74,595 4,229 78,824 2003 76,202 4,321 80,523 2004 79,493 4,507 84,000 2005 82,087 4,654 86,741 2006 84,466 4,789 89,255 2007 87,843 4,981 92,824 2008 88,866 5,039 93,905 2009 88,969 5,045 94,014 2010 91,366 5,180 96,546 2011 91,899 5,056 96,955 2012 92,378 5,083 97,461 2013 92,587 5,094 97,681 2014 93,189 5,127 98,316 2015 93,888 5,166 99,053 2016 94,686 5,090 99,776 2017 95,585 5,139 100,724 2018 96,589 5,192 101,781 2019 97,652 5,250 102,901 2020 98,775 5,310 104,085 2021 99,960 5,290 105,250 2022 101,210 5,356 106,566 2023 102,526 5,426 107,951 2024 103,910 5,499 109,409 2025 105,364 5,576 110,940 2026 106,882 5,611 112,493 2027 108,453 5,694 114,147 2028 110,069 5,779 115,848 2029 111,698 5,864 117,562 2030 113,340 5,950 119,290 2031 114,994 6,037 121,032 2032 116,656 6,124 122,781 2033 118,336 6,213 124,549 2034 120,040 6,302 126,342 2035 121,757 6,392 128,149 2036 123,486 6,483 129,969 2037 125,227 6,574 131,801 2038 126,980 6,667 133,647 2039 128,732 6,759 135,491 2040 130,482 6,850 137,332 Notes: Table A-19: BEBR-Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates. Unincorporated population is assumed to be 66 percent of the total population based on the average ratio of unincorporated population to total population from the previous five years. Table A-20: Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040 Table A-21. Seasonal population from Table A-19 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the year (assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months = 0.42). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-20 Impact Fee Update Study 200 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table A-15 Functional Residents for Non -Residential Land Uses ITE LUC Ill One -Way Visitor Functional Trips Per Trips Per Employees Worker Occupants Days Per Land Use Impact Unit 12) i<l Coefficient Resident Trip Visitors") Hours Per (10) Unit Employee131 Per Unit Isl Hours(e) Per 7rip lel Week (111 SO•� Factor @ Irl Office & Financial 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000sf 23.83 8.91 2.67 11.92 9 1.42 14.26 1.00 5 1.14 720 Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000sf 1,000sf 34.72 8.91 3.90 17.36 9 1.42 20.75 1.00 5 1.66 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000sf 121.30 34.69 3.50 60.65 9 1.52 88.69 0.35 6 2.23 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000sf 159.34 30.94 5.15 79.67 9 1.52 115.95 0.15 6 2.28 710 General Office 1,000sf 11.03 3.32 3.32 5.52 9 1.28 3.75 1.00 5 1.00 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 2.77 2.93 4.06 9 1.28 2.27 1.00 5 0.85 Industrial 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 3.82 2.13 1.79 1.91 9 1.38 0.85 1.00 5 0.50 150 Warehousing 1,000sf 3.56 3.89 0.92 1.78 9 1.38 1.54 0.75 5 0.28 151 Mini-Warehouse/Storage 1,000sf 2.15 61.90 0.03 1.08 9 1.38 1.46 0.75 7 0.06 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 3.77 0.45 0.84 9 1.38 0.71 0.75 5 0.14 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97. 3.02 2.31 3.49 9 1.38 2.51 1.00 5 0.69 n/a Concrete Plant acre 15.60 3.02 5.17 7.80 9 1.38 5.59 1.00 5 1.55 n/a Sand Mining acre 2.00 3.02 0.66 1.00 9 1.38 0.72 1.00 5 0.20 Retail 820 Retail 1,000sfgla 42.70 n/a 2.50 21.35 9 1.73 34.44 1.00 7 2.37 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station fuel pos. 157.33 n/a 2.50 78.67 9 1.52 117.08 0.20 7 1.91 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 28.25 21.14 1.34 14.13 9 1.73 23.10 1.00 7 1.47 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 116.60 n/a 9.92 58.30 9 1.85 97.94 0.75 7 6.78 934 Fast Food Rest w/ Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 511.00 n/a 10.90 255.50 9 1.85 461.78 0.25 7 8.90 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 103.38 87.82 1.18 51.69 9 1.52 77.39 0.50 7 2.05 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000sf 31.43 n/a 1.50 15.72 9 1.52 22.39 1.00 7 1.50 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 43.94 n/a 0.50 21.97 9 1.52 32.89 0.50 7 0.87 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000sf 775.14 n/a 2.50 387.57 9 1.52 586.61 0.20 7 5.83 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 12.19 0.42 2.53 9 1.52 3.43 0.50 7 0.23 Recreational 430 Golf Course hole 35.74 20.52 1.74 17.87 9 2.39 40.97 0.25 7 1.08 492 Raquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 32.93 n/a 2.00 16.47 9 2.39 37.36 1.50 7 3.09 412 County Park acre 2.28 n/a 0.10 1.14 9 2.39 2.62 1.50 7 0.20 491 Tennis Court court 38.70 45.71 0.85 19.35 9 2.39 45.40 1.50 7 3.16 420 Marina berth 2.96 20.52 0.14 1.48 9 2.39 3.40 1.00 7 0.19 Governmental 732 Post Office 1,000sf 108.19 25.37 4.26 54.10 9 1.28 64.99 0.25 5 1.62 590 Library 1,000sf 56.24 52.52 1.07 28.12 9 1.20 32.67 1.00 7 1.76 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf 27.92 7 75 3.60 13.96 9 1.28 14.27 1.00 5 1.39 571 Jail bed 5.50 2.50 2.20 2.75 9 1.20 1.10 1.00 7 0.87 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 A-17 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Total Weighted Seasonal Population Projections (Countywide, excluding Indian River Shores): Table A-22 Table A-23 Table A-24 IRC Permanent Population Projections IRC Seasonal Population Pro ections Year 2000 Permanent Population 109,499 2001 111,695 2002 113,964 2003 116,521 2004 120,567 2005 123,774 2006 128,033 2007 131,932 2008 133,706 2009 133,862 2010 134,127 2011 134,786 2012 135,510 2013 136,075 2014 136,959 2015 137,986 2016 139,159 2017 140,481 2018 141,957 2019 143,518 2020 145,169 2021 146,911 2022 148,748 2023 150,682 2024 152,716 2025 154,854 2026 157,084 2027 159,393 2028 161,768 2029 164,162 2030 166,575 2031 169,007 2032 171,449 2033 173,918 2034 176,423 2035 178,946 2036 181,487 2037 184,046 2038 186,622 2039 189,198 2040 191,769 Year 2000 Seasonal Population 14,782 2001 15,079 2002 15,385 2003 15,730 2004 16,277 2005 16,709 2006 17,284 2007 17,811 2008 18,050 2009 18,071 2010 18,107 2011 17,657 2012 17,752 2013 17,826 2014 17,942 2015 18,076 2016 17,812 2017 17,982 2018 18,170 2019 18,370 2020 18,582 2021 18,511 2022 18,742 2023 18,986 2024 19,242 2025 19,512 2026 19,635 2027 19,924 2028 20,221 2029 20,520 2030 20,822 2031 21,126 2032 21,431 2033 21,740 2034 22,053 2035 22,368 2036 22,686 2037 23,006 2038 23,328 2039 23,650 2040 23,971 Year 2000 Permanent Population 109,499 Seasonal Population 6,208 Total Weighted Season Pop. 115,707 2001 111,695 6,333 118,028 2002 113,964 6,462 120,426 2003 116,521 6,607 123,128 2004 120,567 6,836 127,403 2005 123,774 7,018 130,792 2006 128,033 7,259 135,292 2007 131,932 7,481 139,413 2008 133,706 7,581 141,287 2009 133,862 7,590 141,452 2010 134,127 7,605 141,732 2011 134,786 7,416 142,202 2012 135,510 7,456 142,966 2013 136,075 7,487 143,561 2014 136,959 7,536 144,495 2015 137,986 7,592 145,578 2016 139,159 7,481 146,640 2017 140,481 7,552 148,034 2018 141,957 7,631 149,588 2019 143,518 7,715 151,234 2020 145,169 7,804 15 2, 974 2021 146,911 7,775 154,686 2022 148,748 7,872 156,619 2023 150,682 7,974 158,656 2024 152,716 8,082 160,797 2025 154,854 8,195 163,049 2026 157,084 8,247 165,330 2027 159,393 8,368 167,761 2028 161,768 8,493 170,261 2029 164,162 8,618 172,780 2030 166,575 8,745 175,320 2031 169,007 8,873 177,880 2032 171,449 9,001 180,450 2033 173,918 9,131 183,049 2034 176,423 9,262 185,685 2035 178,946 9,395 188,340 2036 181,487 9,528 191,015 2037 184,046 9,663 193,708 2038 186,622 9,798 196,420 2039 189,198 9,933 199,131 2040 191,769 10,068 201,837 Notes: Table A-22: BEBR-Medium projection for 2040. Interim years were interpolated smooth out annual population growth rates. Population excluding Indian River Shores is assumed to be 97 percent of the total population based on the average ratio of the population excluding Indian River Shores to the total population from the previous five years. Table A-23: Seasonal population percentages are taken from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The percentage for 2030 was assumed for 2031 through 2040 Table A-24: Seasonal population from Table A-22 was weighed by 0.42 to account for seasonal residents only residing in Indian River County for a portion of the year (assume 5 months; 5 month divided by 12 months = 0.42). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 A-21 Impact Fee Update Study 2D1 Appendix B Transportation Impact Fee Demand Component Calculations 20 Z Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Demand Component This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the demand component of the transportation impact fee update. Interstate and Toll Facility Discount Factor Table B-1 presents the interstate and toll facility discount factor used in the calculation of the transportation impact fee. This variable is based on data from the Greater Treasure Coast regional travel demand model, specifically the 2035 projected vehicle miles of travel, accounting for roadway improvements included in the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. It should be noted that discount factor excludes external -to -external trips, which represent traffic that goes through Indian River County, but does not necessarily stop in the county. This traffic is excluded from the calculations since it does not come from development within the county. The I/T discount factor is used to reduce the VMT that the impact fee charges for each land use. Table B-1 Interstate/Toll Facility Discount Factor Roadway 1-95 & Turnpike (SR 19) Other Roads Total (All Roads) Total (Interstate/Toll Roads) VMT (2035) 838,313 4,005,935 4,844,247 838,313 VMT 17.3% 82.7% 100.0% 17.3% Source: Greater Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model v3.4 Single Family Residential Trip Generation Rate Tiering As part of this study, an update to the tiering of the assessed impact fee for the single family residential (detached) land use, to ensure equity by size of home, is included. To facilitate this, an analysis was completed on the comparative relationship between housing size and household travel behavior. This analysis utilized data from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) and the 2011 American Housing Survey (AHS) to examine overall trip - making characteristics of households in the United States. Table B-2 presents the existing trip characteristics being utilized in the current adopted impact fee schedule for the single family (detached) land use. The 2009 NHTS database was used to assess average annual household vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for various annual Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 B-1 Impact Fee Update Study 7_03 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study household income levels. In addition, the 2011 AHS database was used to compare median annual family/household incomes with housing unit size. It is important to recognize that the use of the income variable in each of these databases is completed simply to provide a convenient linking mechanism between household VMT from the NHTS and housing unit size from the AHS. Table B-2 Calculated Single Family Trip Characteristics Calculated Values Excluding Tiering Single Family (Detached) Assessable Ratio to Trip Rate Daily VMT Trip Length Mean 7.81 6.62 51.70 1.00 Source: FL Studies for LUC 210, shown later in this appendix The results of the NHTS and AHS analyses are included in Tables B-3 and B-4. First, the data shown in Table B-3 indicates that the average income in the U.S. for families/households living in housing units between 1,500 and 2,499 square feet in size ($62,563) is slightly lower than the overall average income for the U.S. ($62,831). Then, in Table B-4, annual average household VMT was calculated from the NHTS database for a number of different income levels and raged related to the resulting AHS income data in Table B-3. Table B-3 Annual Income by Housing Size 2011 AHS Average Income Data by Housing Size Annual Income(1) Less than 1,000 sf $34,135 1,000 to 1,499 sf $45,489 1,500 to 2,499 sf $62,563 2,500 sf or more $79,443 Average of All Houses $62,831 Source: 2011 American Household Survey Table B-4 NHTS VMT Annual VMT by Income Category 2009 NHTS Travel Data by Annual Annual HH Income VMT/HH Average of $34,135 17,787 Ratio to Days Daily VMT Mean 365 48.73 0.736 Normalized to 0.995 0.740 Average of $45,489 20,103 365 55.08 0.831 0.835 Average of $62,563 24,069 365 65.94 0.995 1.000 Total (All Homes) 24,181 365 66.25 1.000 - Average of $79,443 28,349 365 77.67 1.172 1.178 Source: 2009 National Household Travel Survey Database. Federal Hiehwav Administration Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County B-2 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study To calculate a corresponding trip rate for the new tiers it was necessary to rely on comparative ratios. As an example, consider the $34,135 annual income category. First, it was determined that the average annual household VMT for this income level is 17,787 miles. This figure was then compared to the overall average annual VMT per household in the U.S. and normalized to the average of the $62,563 (24,069 miles) category to derive a ratio of 0.740. Next, the normalized ratio was applied to the daily VMT for the average single family housing unit size (Less than 1,000 sf) to generate a daily VMT of 38.26 for the new tier, as shown in Table B-5. This daily VMT figure was then divided by the proposed assessable trip length of 6.62 miles to obtain a typical trip rate of 5.78 trips per day. Table B-5 Trip Generation Rate by Single Family Land Use Tier Estimation of Trip Rate by Assessable Tier Trip Rate(1) Trip Length(2) Ratio to Mean(4) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,000 sf 5.78 6.62 38.26 0.740 1,000 to 1,499 sf 6.52 6.62 43.17 0.835 1,500 to 2,499 sf 7.81 6.62 51.70 1.000 2,500 sf or larger 9.20 6.62 60.90 1.178 (11 Daily VMT (Item 31 divided by assessable trip length (Item 21 for each tiered single family land use category (2) Source: Table B-2 (3) Ratio to the mean (Item 4) divided by the total daily VMT for the 1,500 to 2,499 sf tier for each tiered sf single family land use category (4) Source: Table B-4 Table B-6 illustrates the impact that the incorporation of the trip generation rate tiers for the single family (detached) land use have on the County's calculated impact fee schedule. Table B-6 Net Impact Fee by Single Family Land Use Tier Impact of Tiering on Fee Schedule (l) Assessable Fee(2) Trip Rate Trip Length Daily VMT Net Fee Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,000 sf 5.78 6.62 38.26 $3,149 1,000 to 1,499 sf 6.52 6.62 43.17 $3,554 1,500 to 2,499 sf 7.81 6.62 51.70 $4,248 2,500 sf or larger 9.20 6.62 60.90 $5,004 (1) Source: Table B-5, Item 1 (2) Source: Appendix E, Table E-1 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County B-3 Impact Fee Update Study 2,DS Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database The Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database includes over 200 studies on 40 different residential and non-residential land uses collected over the last 20 years. Data from these studies include trip generation, trip length, and percent new trips for each land use. This information has been used in the development of impact fees and the creation of land use plan category trip characteristics for communities throughout Florida and the U.S. TOA estimates trip generation rates for all land uses in a transportation impact fee schedule using data from studies in the Florida Studies Database and the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (9th edition). In instances, when both ITE Trip Generation reference report (9th edition) and Florida Studies trip generation rate (TGR) data are available for a particular land use, the data is typically blended together to increase the sample size and provide a more valid estimate of the average number of trips generated per unit of development. If no Florida Studies data is available, only TGR data from the ITE reference report is used in the fee calculation. The trip generation rate for each respective land use is calculated using machine counts that record daily traffic into and out of the site studied. The traffic count hoses are set at entrances to residential subdivisions for the residential land uses and at all access points for non-residential land uses. The trip length information is obtained through origin -destination surveys that ask respondents where they came from prior to arriving at the site and where they intended to go after leaving the site. The results of these surveys were used to estimate average trip length by land use. The percent new trip variable is based on assigning each trip collected through the origin - destination survey process a trip type (primary, secondary, diverted, and captured). The percent new trip variable is then calculated as 1 minus the percentage of trips that are captured. TOA has published an article entitled, Measuring Travel Characteristics for Transportation Impact Fees, ITE Journal, April 1991 on the data collecting methodology for trip characteristics studies. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 8-4 Impact Fee Update Study Zoo Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Mini -Warehouse (ITE WC 151) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date TotalR Interviews 8:Length Interviews Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Orange Co, FL 107.0 - - - 1.45 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 89.6 - - - 1.23 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 84.7 - - - 1.39 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 93.0 - - - 1.51 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 77.0 - - - 2.18 - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 451.3 784.0 1,235.3 5 14 Average Trip Length: n/a Weighted Average Trip Length: n/a Weighted Percent New Trip Average: - Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Single -Family Detached Housing (ITE LUC 210) 1.53 2.50 2.15 Location Size/Units Date TotalN Interviews dTrip Length Interviews Trip Gen bate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Gwinnett Co, GA - 12/13-18/92 - - 5.80 - 5.40 N/A 31.32 Street Smarts Gwinnett Co, GA - 12/13-18/92 - - 5.40 - 6.10 N/A 32.94 Street Smarts Sarasota Co, FL 76 Jun -93 70 70 10.03 - 6.00 N/A 60.18 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 79 Jun -93 86 86 9.77 - 4.40 N/A 42.99 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 135 Jun -93 75 75 8.05 - 5.90 N/A 47.50 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 152 Jun -93 63 63 8.55 - 7.30 N/A 62.42 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 193 Jun -93 123 123 6.85 - 4.60 N/A 31.51 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 97 Jun -93 33 33 13.20 - 3.00 N/A 39.60 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 282 Jun -93 146 146 6.61 - 8.40 N/A 55.52 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 393 Jun -93 207 207 7.76 - 5.40 N/A 41.90 Sarasota County Hernando Co, FL 76 May -96 148 148 10.01 9a -6p 4.85 N/A 48.55 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Hernando Co, FL 128 May -96 205 205 8.17 9a -6p 6.03 N/A 49.27 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 232 May -96 182 182 7.24 9a -6p 5.04 N/A 36.49 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 301 May -96 264 264 8.93 9a -6p 3.28 N/A 29.29 Tindale-Ohver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 135 Oct -97 230 - 5.30 9a -5p 7.90 N/A 41.87 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 142 Oct -97 245 - 5.20 9a -5p 4.10 N/A 21.32 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 150 Oct -97 160 - 5.00 9a -5p 10.80 N/A 54.00 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 215 Oct -97 158 - 7.60 9a -5p 4.60 N/A 34.96 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 257 Oct -97 225 - 7.60 9a -Sp 7.40 N/A 56.24 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 345 Oct -97 161 - 7.00 9a -5p 6.60 N/A 46.20 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 368 Oct -97 152 - 6.60 9a -5p 5.70 N/A 37.62 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 383 Oct -97 516 - 8.40 9a -5p 5.00 N/A 42.00 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 441 Oct -97 195 - 8.20 9a -5p 4.70 N/A 38.54 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 1469 Oct -97 348 - 6.10 9a -5p 8.00 N/A 48.80 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Collier Co, FL 90 Dec -99 91 - 12.80 8a -6p 11.40 N/A 145.92 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Collier Co, FL 400 Dec -99 389 - 7.80 8a -6p 6.40 N/A 49.92 Tindale-Ohver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 49 Apr -02 170 - 6.70 7a -6p 10.20 N/A 68.34 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 52 Apr -02 212 - 10.00 7a -6p 7.60 N/A 76.00 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 126 Apr -02 217 - 8.50 7a -6p 8.30 N/A 70.55 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pasco Co, FL 55 Apr -02 133 - 6.80 8a -6p 8.12 N/A 55.22 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 60 Apr -02 106 - 7.73 8a -6p 8.75 N/A 67.64 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 70 Apr -02 188 - 7.80 Ba -6p 6.03 N/A 47.03 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Pasco Co, FL 74 Apr -02 188 - 8.18 8a -6p 5.95 N/A 48.67 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 189 Apr -02 261 - 7.46 8a -6p 8.99 N/A 67.07 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 102 Apr -02 167 - 8.02 7a -6p 5.10 N/A 40.90 Kimley-Hom & Associates Marion Co, FL 105 Apr -02 169 - 7.23 7a -6p 7.22 N/A 52.20 Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 124 Apr -02 170 - 6.04 7a -6p 7.29 N/A 44.03 Kimley-Hom & Associates Marion Co, FL 132 Apr -02 171 - 7.87 7a -6p 7.00 N/A 55.09 Kimley-Horn&Associates Marion Co, FL 133 Apr -02 209 - 8.04 7a -6p 4.92 N/A 39.56 Kimley-Horn & Associates Citrus Co, FL 111 Oct -03 273 - 8.66 7a -6p 7.70 N/A 6668 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 231 Oct -03 155 - 5.71 7a -6p 4.82 N/A 27.52 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Citrus Co, FL 306 Oct -03 146 - 8.40 7a -6p 3.94 N/A 33,10 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Citrus Co, FL 364 Oct -03 345 - 7.20 7a -6p 9.14 N/A 65.81 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 374 Oct -03 248 - 12.30 7a -6p 6.88 N/A 84.62 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Lake Co, FL 42 Dec -06 122 - 11.26 - 5.56 N/A 62.61 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Lake Co, FL 51 Dec -06 346 - 18.22 - 9.46 N/A 172.36 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 59 Dec -06 144 - 12.07 - 10.79 N/A 130.24 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 90 Dec -06 194 - 9.12 - 5.78 N/A 52.71 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 239 Dec -06 385 - 7.58 - 8.93 N/A 67.69 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 232 Apr -07 516 - 8.02 7a -6p 8.16 N/A 65.44 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 95 Apr -07 256 - 8.08 7a -6p 5.88 N/A 47.51 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 90 Apr -07 338 - 7.1.3 7a -6p 5.86 N/A 41.78 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 58 Apr -07 153 - 6.16 7a -6p 8.39 N/A 51.68 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Colher Co, FL 74 Mar -08 503 - 12.81 7a -6p 3.05 N/A 39.07 Tindal e-Ol iver & Assod ate s Collier Co, FL 97 Mar -08 512 - 8.78 7a -6p 11.29 N/A 99.13 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Collier Co, FL 315 Mar -08 1,347 - 6.97 7a -6p 6.55 N/A 45.65 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Collier Co, FL 42 Mar -08 314 - 9.55 7a -6p 10.96 N/A 104.86 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Total Size 10,380 55 13,130 Note: Georgia studies are not included in summary statistics Average Trip Length: 6.79 Weighted Average Trip Length: 6.62 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 7.81 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County B-5 Impact Fee Update Study 2D7 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Multi-Family/Apartment and Residential Condo/Townhouse (ITE LUC 220/230) Location Size/Units pate Total Size Total Size (114 4,103 �2..ti9 Average Trip Length: 37...L4.84 5-'. 1631 -'"+ Weighted Average Trip Length: 41-5.10. Total Size 3,467 ITE 58.488 Blended total 21,947 L_LUC 230 Studies arehighlighted,, Total Size 636 ITE 10.024 Blended total 10,660 13 88 4 56 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Blend of FLStudies and LTE Average Trip Generation Rate: ;lir 770 Multl.Fam119 6.31 6.65 6.60 LIUC 230: Condo/Townhouse.J Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 4.97 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.81 Blend of FL Studies and RE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.76 Mobile Home Park (ITE LUC 240) Location Size /Units Date Total fl Interviews pTrip length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length percent New Trips VMT Source Sarasota Co, Fl 212 Jun -93 42 42 5.78 - 5.20 N/A 3006 Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 243 Jun -93 36 36 5.84 - - N/A - Sarasota County Marion Co, FL 214 Apr -02 175 175 6.84 - 4.61 N/A 3L53 Kimley-Hom & Associates Marion Co F1 240 Apr -02 174 174 6.96 - 3.43 N/A 23.87 Kimley-Hom & Associates Marion Co, FL 288 Apr -02 175 175 5.66 - 5.55 N/A 31.41 Kimley-Hom&Assad ates Marion Co, FL 480 Apr -02 175 175 5.73 - 6.88 N/A 39.42 Klmley-Hom&Associates Marion Co, FL 500 Apr -02 170 170 5.46 - 5.94 N/A 32.43 Kimley-Hom&Associates Lake Co, FL 250 Dec -06 135 135 671 - 5.33 N/A 35.76 Tlndale-Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 157 Dec -06 265 265 13.97 - 2.62 N/A 36.60 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 169 Dec -06 212 - 8.09 - 6.00 N/A 4854 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 226 Dec -06 301 - 6.74 - 2.17 N/A 14.63 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 312 Apr -07 456 - 4.03 - 5.95 N/A 24.34 Tlndale.Oliver&Assodates Hernando Co, FL 176 Apr -07 332 - 5.38 _ 5.24 N/A 2819 Tindal e-Oliver&Assad ates Hernando Co, FL 31 May -96 31 31 6.12 9a -6p 4.98 N/A 30.48 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 128 May -96 128 128 _ 6.47 9a -6p 5.18 N/A 33.51 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates Pasco Co, FL 229 Apr -02 198 198 4.77 9a -6p - N/A - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Pasco Co, FL 248 Apr -02 353 353 4.24 9a -6p 3.53 N/A 14.97 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Total Size Total Size (114 4,103 �2..ti9 Average Trip Length: 37...L4.84 5-'. 1631 -'"+ Weighted Average Trip Length: 41-5.10. Total Size 3,467 ITE 58.488 Blended total 21,947 L_LUC 230 Studies arehighlighted,, Total Size 636 ITE 10.024 Blended total 10,660 13 88 4 56 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Blend of FLStudies and LTE Average Trip Generation Rate: ;lir 770 Multl.Fam119 6.31 6.65 6.60 LIUC 230: Condo/Townhouse.J Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 4.97 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.81 Blend of FL Studies and RE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.76 Mobile Home Park (ITE LUC 240) Location Size /Units Date Total Interviews piriP Length Imerviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Marion Co, FL 67 Jul -91 22 22 5.40 48hrs. 2.29 N/A 12.37 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Marlon Co, FL 82 1u1-91 58 58 10.80 24hr. 3.72 N/A 40.18 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Marion Co, FL 137 Jul -91 22 22 3.10 24hr. 4.88 N/A 13.13 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Marion Co, FL 188 Apr -02 147 - 3.51 24hr. 5.48 N/A 19.23 Klmley-Horn&Associates Marion Co, Fl 227 Apr -02 173 - 2.76 24hr. 8.80 N/A 24.29 Klmley-Horn&Associates Sarasota Co, FL 235 Jun -93 100 100 3.51 - 5.10 N/A 17.90 Sarasota County Marion Co, FL 297 Apr•02 175 - 4.78 24hr. 4.76 N/A 22.75 Klmley-Horn & Associates Sarasota Co, FL 996 Jun -93 181 181 4.19 - 4,40 N/A 1844 Sarasota County Hernando Co, FL 1,892 May -96 425 425 4.13 9a -6p 4,13 N/A 17.06 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Total Size 4,121 9 1,303 .fOkF�,::".et.,...it.41-Average Trip Length: ENT 4.84 Cap � 76'ls-.S:Welghted Ave rage Tdp Length: Tget 4.601 x3 WelgMed Average Trip Generation Rate: Senior Adult Housing -Attached (ITE LUC 252) 4.17 Location Size/Units pate Total SI Interviews pd Tp Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Sun City Center, FL 208 Oct -91 726 726 2.46 24hr. 3.78 - 807 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Total Size ITE Blended total 208 438 6917x' "r. X't33Ma . 9Average Trip Length: ZE53.28 Ill 1,74.W74,14. Weighted Average Trip Length: W3.28 -WI Weight d Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and RTE Average Trip Generation Rate: Congregate Care Facirty ( ITE LUC 253) 2.46 3.44 2.97 Location Size/Units pate Total Interviews II Trip p length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Pinellas Park, FL 72 Aug -89 25 19 3.50 9am-Spm 2.20 79.0 7.70 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Palm Harbor, FL 200 Oct.89 58 40 • gam-5pm 3.40 69.0 - Tindale -Oliver& Assodates Total Size REe Blended total 272 2 83 '--:-.W.-oiat.a;x94' Average Trip Length: ONO 2.80 lat. A115 2 'Yd(=T*ti35 Weighted Average Trip Length: 16813.08 aR 660 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 71.6 460 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 3.50 2.02 125 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 B-6 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Hotel (ITE LUC 310) Location Size (Rooms) Date Totalg Interviews fJTrip length Interviews Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Tdp Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Pinellas Co, FL 174 Aug -89 134 106 12.50 7-110/3-78 6.30 79.0 62.21 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pinellas Co, FL 114 Oct -89 30 14 7.30 12-7p 6.20 47.0 21.27 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Orange Co, FL 70 - - - 1.85 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 211 - - - 2.23 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 112 - - - 2.78 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 1,495 - - - 3.50 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 123 - - - 3.70 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 130 - - - 4.29 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 1,499 - - - 469 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 190 - - - 4.71 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 123 - - - 4.81 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 105 - - - 5.25 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 120 - - - 5.27 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 1,584 - - - 5.88 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 128 - - - 6.10 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 174 - - - 7.03 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 144 - - - 7.32 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 98 - - - 7.32 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 106 - - - 7.34 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 100 - - - 7.37- - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 141 - - - 7.66 - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 6,944 4_`60 11,704 21 10 164 -;..e „'--.•vim_-_tStAverage Trip Length: '+'-6.25_ -+,. ";F Weighted Average Tdp length: -6.26 Weighted Percent New Tdp Average: 66.3 Weighted Average Tdp Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and RTE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Motel (ITE LUC 320) 5.12 8.17 6.36 Location Size (Rooms) Date Totalg Interviews #Trip Length Interviews Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Pinellas Co, FL 48 Oct -89 46 24 - 100-28 2.80 65.0 - Tindal e -Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 54 Oct -89 32 22 - 12p -7p 3.80 69.0 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pinellas Co, FL 120 Oct -89 26 22 - 2p -7p 5.20 84.6 - Tindale-011ver & Associates Total Size ITE 222 2,160 3 10 104 ..22r0.L,tW:iMl' i'Averege Tdp length: 1= 3.93 __ =Weighted Average Tdp Length: l Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 76.6 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Movie Theater with Matinee (ITE LUC 444 5.63 Location Size(Screens) Date Totalg pTdp length Trip Gen Rate Time Period Tdp Length Percent New VMT Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 Interviews Interviews - - 7.90 Trips 89.10 Kimley-Hom & Associates _ Pinellas Co, FL 8 Oct -89 151 116 113.10 2p -8p 2.70 77.0 235.13 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 12 Sep -89 122 116 63.40 2p -8p 1.90 95.0 114.44 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Total Size ITE 20 30 estimated 30 273 " '4M". --= h'WAverage Trip Length: 4.02.30 air .cMiriXiiiri4iIiiirWeighted Average Tdp Length:"40442.22 Weighted Percent New Tdp Average: 87.8 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate (6th): Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Health Club (ITE LUC 492) 83.28 153.33 106.63 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Totalg Interviews RTrlp Length Interviews Tdp Gen Rate lime Period Tdp Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 33 31 - - 7.90 94.0 89.10 Kimley-Hom & Associates _ Total Size ITE 15 33 Average Tdp Length: gr=4 n/a -4^ Percent New Trip Average: 94.0 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Day Care Center (ITE LUC 565) 32.93 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total Interviews RTrlp Length Interviews Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Pinellas Co, FL 5.6 Aug -89 94 66 66.99 7a -6p 1.90 70.0 89.10 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pinellas Co, FL 10.0 Sep -89 179 134 66.99 7a -6p 2.10 75.0 105.51 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 28 25 - - 2.60 89.0 - Kimley-Hom&Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 15.6 50.6 2 7 301 21 ..� Average Tdp length: M220`"F_-- ISTeRNHIRIMN Weighted Average Tdp Length:'i'5S2.03 T28 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 73.2 Weighted Average Tdp Generation Rate: ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Avenge Tdp Generation Rate: 66.99 74.06 71.88 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County B-7 Impact Fee Update Study 10Q Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Nursing Home (ITE LUC 620) Location Sire (Beds) pate Interviews KTrip length Interviews Trip Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Lakeland, FL 120 Mar -90 74 66 2.86 lla-4p 2.59 89.0 6.59 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Total Site RE Blended total 120 714 834 6 74 Average Tdp Length: 2.59 Weighted Average Tdp Length: 2.59 Weighted Percent New Tdp Average: 89.0 Weight d Average Tdp Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FLStudies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Clinic (ITE LUC 630) 2.86 2.74 2.76 Location Sloe (1,000sf) Date Total Interviews pTHD Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source largo, FL 103.9 Aug -89 614 572 37.03 7a -430p 5.10 93.0 175.63 Tindate-Oliver & Assodates 5t. Petersburg, FL - Ott -89 280 252 - 9a -5p 4.10 90.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Total Sire RE 103.9 2 327.9 2 894 Avera eTrip Length: 4.60 Weighted Avera eTrip Length: 5.10 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 93.0 Weighted Average Tdp Generation Rate: ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: General Office Building (ITE LUC 710) 37.03 31.45 33.22 Location Sire (1,000 s1) pate Total Interviews OTd Trip length Interviews Tdp Gen Rate Time Period Tdp Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Sarasota Co, FL 14.3 lun-93 14 14 46.85 - 11.30 - 529.41 Sarasota County Gwinnett Co, GA 98.0 Dec -92 - - 4.30 - 5.40 - - Street Smarts Gwinnett Co, GA 1800 Dec -92 - - 3.60 - 5.90 - - Street Smarts Pinellas Co, FL 187.0 Ott -89 431 388 18.49 7a -Sp 630 90.0 104.84 Tindale -Oliver &Assodate s 5t. Petersburg, Fl 262.8 Sep -89 291 274 - 7a -5p 3.40 94.0 - "'Indere-Oliver&Assodates Total Sire RE 742.1 5 736 Average Trip Length: 6.46 15,522.0 78 Weighted Average Tdp Length: 5.15 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 92.3 Medical -Dental Office Building (ITE LUC 720): 10,000 sf or Less Site Site (1,000 sf) Tues., lan 11 Wedn., Jan 12 Thur., Jan 13 TOTAL AVERAGE AVERAGE (per 1,000 sf) IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN 017T IN OUT IN OUT. TOTAL Site 1 2.100 35 35 22 22 13 13 70 70 23.33 23.33 11.11 11.11 22.22 Site2 3.000 40 40 52 52 53 53 145 145 48.33 48.33 16.11 16.11 32.22 Site3 2.000 28 28 19 21 24 26 71 75 23.67 25.00 11.84 1250 24.34 Site4 1.000 30 30 52 52 57 57 139 139 46.33 46.33 46.33 46.33 92.66 Sites 3.024 31 32 43 43 24 24 98 99 32.67 33.00 10.80 10.91 21.71 Site6 1.860 22 24 19 17 11 11 52 52 17.33 17.33 9.32 9.32 18.64 Average 17.59 17.71 35.30 Average (egduding Site 4) 11.84 11.99 23.83 Medical -Dental Office Building (ITE LUC 720) Location Sire (1,000 sf) Date Total Sire RE Blended total 298.6 450.0 748.6 11 10 763 Average Trip Length: 5.07 Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.55 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 88.9 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and RE Average Trip Generation Rate: 32.59 3613 34-n Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County B-8 Impact Fee Update Study 2,10 Total II Interviews gTAD Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Tdp Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 33 26 - - 6.00 79.0 - Kimley-Horn&Assodates Palm Harbor, FL 14.6 Oct -89 104 76 33.98 9a -5p 6.30 73.0 15627 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates St. Petersburg, FL - Nov -89 34 30 57.20 9a -4p 1.20 88.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Hernando Co, FL 58.4 May-% 390 349 2852 9a -6p 6.47 89.5 165.09 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hernando Co, FL 28.0 May -96 202 189 49.75 9a -6p 606 938 282.64 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Charlotte Co, FL 11.0 Oct -97 - 186 49.50 9a -5p 4.60 92.1 209.67 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Charlotte Co, FL 28.0 Ott -97 - 186 31.03 9a -5p 3.60 81.6 91.04 Tindale.Oliver&Assodates Charlotte Co, FL 30.4 Ott -97 - 324 39.93 9a -5p 3.30 83.5 109.68 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Citrus Co, FL 38.9 Ott -03 - 168 3226 8-6p 6.80 97.1 213.03 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Citrus Co, FL 10.0 ' Nov -03 - 340 40.56 8.630p 6.20 92.4 232.33 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Citrus Co, FL 5.3 Dec -03 - 20 29.36 6-5p 5.25 95.2 146.78 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Orange Co, FL 50.6 - - - 26.72 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 23.5 - - - 16.58 - - - Orange County Total Sire RE Blended total 298.6 450.0 748.6 11 10 763 Average Trip Length: 5.07 Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.55 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 88.9 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Tdp Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and RE Average Trip Generation Rate: 32.59 3613 34-n Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County B-8 Impact Fee Update Study 2,10 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Business Park (ITE LUC 770) Location Size (1,0004) Date Total Interviews 4TnP length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Pedod Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Collier Co, FL 14.1 May -99 - 55 33.48 8a -6p 3.60 72.7 87.62 Tindale -Oliver & Assad ates Collier Co, FL 66.0 May -99 - 43 11.53 8a -6p 5.70 79.0 51.92 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Collier Co, FL 211.1 May -99- 354 284 17.91 8a -6p 5.40 93.0 89.94 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 291.2 6288.0 6,579.2 3 16 Average Trip Length: 4.90 Weighted Average Trip length: 5.38 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 88.8 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Shopping Center (ITE LUC 820) 17.22 12.44 12.65 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total Size 5,757.5 7,536 Average Trip Length: n/a Weighted Average Trip Length: n/a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 B-9 Impact Fee Update Study Total t4 Interviews 4Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 527 348 - - - 66.0 - Kimley-Horn & Associates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 170 - - - 1.70 - - Kimley-Horn&Associates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 354 269 - - - 76.0 - Kimley-Horn & Associates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 144 - - - 2.50 - - Kimley-Horn & Associates St. Petersburg, FL 1,192.0 Aug -89 384 298 - 110-79 3.60 78.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates St. Petersburg, FL 132.3 Sep -89 400 368 77.00 10a -7p 1.80 92.0 127.51 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Largo, FL 425.0 Aug -89 160 120 26.73 10a -6p 2.30 75.0 46.11 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Dunedin, FL 80.5 Sep -89 276 210 8148 9a -5p 1.40 76.0 86.69 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pinellas Park, FL 696.0 Sep -89 485 388 - 9a -6p 3.20 800 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Seminole, FL 425.0 Oct -89 674 586 - - - 87.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hillsborough Co, FL 134.0 Jul -91 - - - - 1.30 74.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Hillsborough Co, FL 151.0 Jul -91 - - - - 1.30 73.0 - Tind ale -Oliver & Assodates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 68 64 - - 3.33 94.1 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 208 154 - - 2.64 74.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Sarasota/Bradenton, FL 109.0 Sep -92 300 185 - 12a -6p - 61.6 - King Engineering Associates, Inc. Ocala, FL 133.4 Sep -92 300 192 - 12a -6p - 64.0 - King Engineering Assodates, Inc. Gwinnett Co, GA 99.1 Dec -92 - - 46.00 - 3.20 70.0 103.04 Street Smarts Gwinnett Co, GA 314.7 Dec -92 - - 27.00 - 8.50 84.0 192.78 Street Smarts Sarasota Co, FL 110.0 Jun -93 58 98 122.14 - 3.20 - - Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 146.1 Jun -93 65 65 51.53 - 2.80 - - Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 157.5 lun-93 57 57 79.79 - 3.40 - - Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 1910 Jun -93 62 62 66.79 - 5.90 - - Sarasota County Hernando Co, FL 107.8 May -96 608 331 77.60 9a -6p 4.68 54.5 197.85 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Charlotte Co, FL 88.0 Oct -97 - - 73.50 9a -5p 180 57.1 75.56 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Charlotte Co, FL 1919 Oct -97 - - 72.00 9a -5p 2.40 50.9 87.97 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Charlotte Co, FL 51.3 Oct -97 - - 43.00 9a -5p 2.70 51.8 60.08 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 67.8 Apr -01 246 177 102.60 - 3.40 71.2 248.37 Tindale-Oliver &Associates Lake Co, FL 72.3 Apr -01 444 376 65.30 - 4.50 59.0 173.37 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Pasco Co, FL 65.6 Apr -02 222 - 145.64 9a -5p 1.46 46.9 99.62 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Pasco Co, FL 75.8 Apr -02 134 - 38.23 9a -5p 2.36 58.2 52.52 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Citrus Co, FL 185.0 Oct -03 - 784 55.84 8a -6p 2.40 88.1 118.05 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Citrus Co, FL 913 Nov -03 - 393 5450 8a -6p 160 88.0 76.77 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Bozeman, MT 104.3 Dec -06 359 359 4696 - 3.35 49.0 77.08 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Bozeman, MT 159.9 Dec -06 502 502 5649 - 156 54.0 47.59 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Bozeman, MT 35.9 Dec -06 329 329 69.30 - 139 74.0 71.28 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Total Size 5,757.5 7,536 Average Trip Length: n/a Weighted Average Trip Length: n/a Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 B-9 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study 4.00 3.50 3.00 CII E 2.50 to 2.00 v o, 1.50 1- 1.00 0.50 0.00 Figure B-1 Shopping Center (LUC 820) — Florida Curve Trip Length Regression ♦♦.♦♦♦♦•• �' • 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Square Footage Source: Regression analysis based on FL Studies data for LUC 820 90% 80% 70% e 60% 1— a, 50% z c 40% 8 u 30% a 20% 10% 0% Figure B-2 Shopping Center (LUC 820) — Florida Curve Percent New Trips Regression A.0•••••••••••••••• • 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Square Footage Source: Regression analysis based on FL Studies data for LUC 820 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County B-10 Impact Fee Update Study 212- Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study New Car Sales (ITE LUC 841) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Tatalg Interviews RTrip length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source St.Petersbur&FL 43.0 Oct -89 152 120 - 9a -5p 4.70 79.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Clearwater, FL 43.0 Oct -89 136 106 29.40 9a -5p 4.50 760 103.19 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Orange Co, FL 116.7 - - - 22.18 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 99.8 - - - 13.45 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 39.1 - - - 10.48 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 66.3 - - - 28.50 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 46.7 - - - 40.34 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 34.4 - - - 23.45 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 13.8 - - - 35.75 - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 459 7 8 288 Average Trip Length: 4.60 570.0 15 Weighted Average Trip Length: 4.60 1,029.7 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 78.5 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Supermarket (ITE LUC 850) 23.22 32.30 2815 Location Size (1,000 sf) late Total4 Interviews ATrip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Palm Harbor, FL 62.0 Aug -89 163 62 106.26 9a -4p 2.08 56.0 123.77 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 62.0 156.0 218.0 4 163 Average Trip Length: 2.08 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.08 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 56.0 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Service Station w/Convenience Market (ITE LUC 853) 106.26 102.24 103.38 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total Size ITE Blended Total 25.1 30.0 55.1 45.6 9 10 15.6 1,148 Average Trip Length: 1.44 Weighted Average Trip Length: 1.51 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 27.7 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Furniture Store (ITE LUC 890) 639.68 845.60 775.14 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total0 Interviews RTdp Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate - Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 72 - - - 2.00 - - Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 1.1 Jun -91 77 20 544.80 24hr. 0.89 26.0 126.07 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Marion Co, FL 2.1 Jun -91 66 24 997.60 24hr. 1.67 36.4 606.42 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 4.4 Jun -91 85 25 486.70 48hrs. 1.06 29.4 151.68 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 96 38 - - 1.19 39.6 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 78 16 - - 1.06 20.5 - Tindale -Oliver &Assotiates Tampa, FL 2.3 10/13-15/92 239 74 - 24hr. 1.06 31.1 - Tindale -Oliver &Assodotes Ellenton, FL 3.3 10/20-22/92 124 44 - 24hr. 0.96 35.3 - Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Tampa, FL 3.8 11/10-12/92 142 23 - 24hr. 3.13 16.4 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Marion Co, FL 2.5 Apr -02 87 - 719.79 24hr. 1.62 32.8 322.19 Kimley-Horn &Associates Marion Co, FL 2.5 Apr -02 23 - 610.46 24hr. 1.77 11.7 126.61 Kimley-Horn&Associates Marion Co, FL 3.0 Apr -02 59 - 606.02 24hr. 0.83 32.6 195.00 Kimley-Horn&Associates Total Size ITE Blended Total 25.1 30.0 55.1 45.6 9 10 15.6 1,148 Average Trip Length: 1.44 Weighted Average Trip Length: 1.51 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 27.7 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Furniture Store (ITE LUC 890) 639.68 845.60 775.14 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Totalp Interviews RTrip length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Largo, FL 15.0 7/28-30/92 64 34 - - 4.63 52.5 - Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Tampa, FL 16.9 Jul -92 68 39 - - 7.38 55.7 - Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Total Size ITE 31.9 897.0 2 13 32 Average Trip Length: 6.01 Weighted Average Trip Length: 6.09 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 54.2 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.06 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 B-11 Impact Fee Update Study 113 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Drive -In Bank (ITE LUC 912) Location Size (1,000sf) pate Totalg Interviews 074: Length Interviews Tdp Gen Rate Tme Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VIM Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 77 - - - 2.40 - - Kimley-Horn & Associates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 211 - - - - 54.0 - Kimley-Horn & Associates Clearwater, FL 0.4 Aug -89 113 52 - 9a -6p 5.20 46.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Largo, FL 2.0 Sep -89 129 94 - - 1.60 730 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Seminole, FL 4.5 Oct -89 - - - - - - - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.3 Jun -91 69 29 - 24hr. 1.33 42.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 3.1 Jun -91 47 32 - 24hr. 1.75 68.1 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.5 Jul -91 57 26 - 48hrs. 270 45.6 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 162 96 - 24hr. 0.88 59.3 - Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 116 54 - - 1.58 46.6 - Tindale -Oliver &Assodates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 142 68 - - 2.08 47.9 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Hernando Co, FL 5.4 May -96 164 41 - 9a -6p 2.77 24.7 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Marion Co, FL 2.4 Apr -02 70 - - 24hr. 3.55 54.6 - Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.7 May -02 50 - 246.66 24hr. 2.66 40.5 265.44 Kimley-Horn & Associates Total Size ITE Blended total 25.2 21.0 46.2 23.7 9 1,407 7 Average Trip Length: 2.38 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.46 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 46.2 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FLStudies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Restaurant (ITE LUC 932) 246.66 148.15 159.34 Location Size (1,000 sf) pate Totalg Interviews RTdp Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length percent New Trips VMT Source Hernando Co, FL 6.2 May -96 242 175 187.51 9a -6p 2.76 72.5 375.00 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Hernando Co, Fl 8.2 May -96 154 93 102.71 9a -6p 4.15 60.2 256.43 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates St. Petersburg, FL 5.0 Oct -89 74 68 132.60 1130-7p 2.00 92.0 243.98 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Kenneth City, FL 5.2 Oct -89 236 176 127.88 4p -730p 2.30 75.0 220.59 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Pasco Co, FL 5.2 Apr -02 114 88 82.47 9a -6p 3.72 77.2 236.81 Tindale -Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 5.8 Apr -02 182 102 116.97 9a -6p 3.49 56.0 228.77 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Orange Co, FL &9 - - - 52.69 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 11.3 - - - 62.12 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 6.7 - - - 82.58 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 11.4 - - - _ 91.67 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 11.3 - - - 95.33 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 7.2 - - - 98.06 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 5.5 - - - 100.18 - _ - _ - Orange County Orange Co, FL 9.7 - - - 105.84 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 4.6 - - - 129.23 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 7.0 - - - 126.40 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 9.7 - - - 132.32 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 5.0 - - - 135.68 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 5.6 - - - 145.59 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 7.4 - - - 147.44 - - - - Orange County Orange Co, FL 5.9 - - - 147.74 - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 152.8 98.0 250.8 21 1,102 14 Average Trip Length: 3.07 Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.17 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 70.8 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Fast Food Restaurant w/Drive Thru (ITE LUC 934) 103.84 127.15 116.60 Location Size )1,000sf) pate Total Interviews 4Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Tampa, FL - Mar -86 61 - - - 2.70 - - Kimley-Horn &Associates Tampa, FL - Mar -86 306 - - - - 65.0 - Kimley-Horn&Associates Pinellas Co, FL 2.20 Aug -89 81 48 502.80 110-2p 1.70 59.0 504.31 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Pinellas Co, FL 4.30 Oct -89 456 260 660.40 lday 2.30 57.0 865.78 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Tarpon Springs, FL - Oct -89 233 114 - 7a -7p 3.60 49.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 160 Jun -91 60 32 962.50 48hrs. 091 53.3 466.84 Tindal e -Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 4.00 Jun -91 75 46 625.00 48hrs. 1.54 61.3 590.01 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 66 44 - - 1.91 66.7 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug -91 118 40 - - 1.17 33.9 - Tindal e -Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 5.43 May -96 136 82 311.83 9a -6p 1.68 60.2 315.27 Tindal e-Oliver&Associates Hernando Co, FL 3.13 May -96 168 82 547.34 9a -6p 1.59 48.8 425.04 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Lake Co, FL 2.20 Apr -81 376 252 934.30 - 2.50 74.6 1742.47 Tindale -Oliver &Associates Lake Co, FL 3.20 Apr -01 171 182 654.90 - 4.10 47.8 - Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Lake Co, FL 3.80 Apr -01 188 137 353.70 - 3.30 70.8 826.38 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Pasco Co, FL 2.66 Apr -02 100 46 283.12 9a -6p 5.10 46.0 - Tindale -Oliver &Associates Pasco Co, FL 2.96 Apr -02 486 164 515.32 9a -6p 2.72 33.7 472.92 Tindale-Oliver&Associates Pasco Co, FL 4.42 Apr -02 168 120 759.24 9a -6p 1.89 71.4 1024.99 Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Orange Co, FL 893 - - - 377.00 - - - - Orange County Total Size ITE Blended total 48.8 63.0 111.8 34.0 13 4,463 21 Average Trip length: 2.42 Weighted Avenge Trip Length: 2.05 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 57.9 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 530.19 496.12 511.00 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County B-12 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Automobile Care Center (ITE LUC 942) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total Interviews gTrip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Jacksonville, FL 2.3 2/3-4/90 124 94 - 9a -5p 3.07 76.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Jacksonville, FL 2.3 2/3-4/90 110 74 - 9a -5p 2.96 67.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Jacksonville, FL 2.4 2/3-4/90 132 87 - 9a -5p 2.32 66.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Lakeland, FL 5.2 Mar -90 24 14 - 9a -4p 1.36 59.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Largo, FL 55 Sep -89 34 30 37.64 9a -5p 2.40 880 79.50 Tindale -Oliver & Assodates Orange Co, FL 25.0 Nov -92 41 39 - 2-6p 4.60 - - LCE, Inc. Lakeland, FL - Mar -90 54 42 - 9a -4p 2.44 780 - Tindale-Oliver&Assodates Total Size ITE Blended total 42.6 102.0 144.6 107.5 6 6 519 Average Trip Length: 2.74 Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.62 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 72.2 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Service Station with and w/o Car Wash (ITE LUC 944 & 946) 37.64 31.10 31.43 Location Size (1,090 sf) Date Total g Interviews gTrip length Interviews Trip Gen fate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Largo, FL 0.6 Nov -89 70 14 - 8am-5pm 1.90 23.0 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Collier County, FL - Aug -91 168 40 - - 1.01 23.8 - Tindale -Oliver & Associates Total Size ITE LUC 944 (vfp) ITE LUC 946 (vfp) 0.6 48.0 120.0 1 6 10 238 Average Trip Length: 1.46 Weighted Average Trip Length: 1.90 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 23.0 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position (LUC 944): ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position (LUC 946): Blended ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position: Self -Service Car Wash (ITE LUC 947) 168.56 152.84 157.33 Location Sire (Bays) Date Totalg Interviews gTrip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips VMT Source Largo, FL 10 Nov -89 111 84 - 8am-5pm 2.00 76.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Clearwater, FL - Nov -89 177 108 - 10am-5pm 1.30 61.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Collier, FL 11 Dec -09 304 - 30.24 - 2.50 57.0 - Tindale-Oliver&Associates Collier, FL8 Jan -09 186 - 22.75 - 1.96 72.0 - Tindale -Oliver &Assodates Total Size Total Size (TGR) ITE Blended total 29 3 778 Average Trip Length: 1.94 19 2 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.18 5 1 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 67.7 24 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of Fl Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 27.09 116.00 43.94 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 B-13 Impact Fee Update Study 2JS Appendix C Transportation Impact Fee Cost Component Calculations Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Cost Component This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the cost component of the transportation impact fee update. Backup data and assumptions are provided for all cost variables (for county and state roads), including: • Design • Right -of -Way • Construction • Construction Engineering/Inspection • Roadway Capacity Urban Design vs. Rural Design Due to a lack of roadway construction data for rural -design roadways, the cost per lane mile for these types of roads was calculated using an adjustment factor. This factor was based on the rural -to -urban design cost ratio from the most recent District 7 Long Range Estimates (LRE) provided by FDOT. Based on the LRE, the cost for rural -design roadway capacity expansion (new road construction or lane addition) is approximately 83 percent of the cost of urban -design roadway improvements. For all subsequent tables (for county and state roadways), costs are presented for urban -design roadways, with the rural -design roadway costs being calculated using the cost ratio from Table C-1. Table C-1 Urban / Rural Design Cost Factor Improvement 0-2 Lanes Cost Rural Design $2,392,343 per Lane Mile Urban Design Ratio $3,383,918 71% 0-4 Lanes $1,918,228 $2,382,206 81% 0-6 Lanes $1,626,803 $1,944,969 84% 2-4 Lanes $2,897,987 $3,439,476 84% 4-6 Lanes $3,229,018 $3,833,955 84% 4-8 Lanes $2,145,375 $2,532,536 85% 6-8 Lanes $4,061,468 $4,569,033 89% Average $2,610,175 $3,155,156 83% Source: FDOT District 7 Long Range Estimates, 2013 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County C-1 Impact Fee Update Study 217 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Design County Roadways The design cost factor for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the design -to - construction cost ratios for county road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For county roadways, the design factors ranged from 6 percent to 14 percent, with a weighted average of 10 percent. For purposes of this update study, the design cost for county roads was calculated at 10 percent of the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-10 for additional information). Table C-2 Design Cost Adjustment — County Roads 1) Design cost is estimated at 10% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in Table C-10 (Item a). (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. State Roadways The design cost factor for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the design -to - construction cost ratios for state road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For state roadways, the design factors ranged from 10 percent to 14 percent, with a weighted average of 11 percent. For purposes of this update study, the design cost for state roads was calculated at 11 percent of the construction cost per lane mile. See Table C-10 for additional information. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 C-2 Impact Fee Update Study Zig DesignM(N Section Design Distribution Weighted Road Type ikEIDEMP Design Gost.per kal3„„�� Urban Design $180,000 34% $61,000 Rural Design $149,000 66% $98,000 Weighted Average Design Cost per Lane Mile $159,000 1) Design cost is estimated at 10% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in Table C-10 (Item a). (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. State Roadways The design cost factor for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the design -to - construction cost ratios for state road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For state roadways, the design factors ranged from 10 percent to 14 percent, with a weighted average of 11 percent. For purposes of this update study, the design cost for state roads was calculated at 11 percent of the construction cost per lane mile. See Table C-10 for additional information. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 C-2 Impact Fee Update Study Zig Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table C-3 Design Cost Adjustment — State Roads Road Type Urban Design Rural Design Design Cost per Section Design Lane Mile(1) Distribution(2) $220,000 $183,000 34% 66% Weighted Average Design Cost per Lane Mile Weighted Design Cost per Lane Mi1e131 $75,000 $121,000 $196,000 1) Design cost is estimated at 11% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in Table C-10 (Item b). (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) Design cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. Right -of -Way The ROW cost reflects the total cost of the acquisitions along a corridor that was necessary to have sufficient cross-section width to widen an existing road or, in the case of new construction, build a new road. County Roadways To determine a ROW acquisition cost per lane mile for county roads, TOA conducted a review of recently completed ROW acquisitions and current ROW estimates along capacity expansion projects in Indian River County and also reviewed ROW estimates from recent transportation impact fee studies from other counties in Florida. For impact fee purposes, the ROW cost for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the ROW -to -construction cost ratios for county road unit costs from recent local projects and in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For county roadways in Indian River County, the ROW factors ranged from 6 percent to 150 percent, with a weighted average of 41 percent, as shown in Table C-11. This factor is consistent with the ratio of ROW to construction cost observed in other Florida jurisdictions, as shown in Table C-12. For purposes of this update study, the ROW cost for county roads was calculated at 41 percent of the construction cost per lane mile. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 C-3 Impact Fee Update Study (a Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-4 Right -of -Way Cost Adjustment — County Roads Road Type Urban Design Rural Design ROW Cost per Section Design Lane Mile(1) Distribution(2) $738,000 $613,000 34% 66% Weighted Average ROW Cost per Lane Mile Weighted ROW Cost per Lane Mile(3) $251,000 $405,000 $656,000 (1) ROW cost is estimated at 41% of construction cost based on recent IRC improvements in Table C-11 (Item 2). (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) ROW cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. State Roadways Due to a lack of local acquisition data, the ROW cost for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the ROW -to -construction cost ratios for state road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For state roadways, the ROW factors ranged from 20 percent to 71 percent, with a weighted average of 44 percent. For purposes of this update study, the ROW cost for state roads was calculated at 44 percent of the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-12 for additional information). Table C-5 Right -of -Way Cost Adjustment — State Roads Road Type Urban Design Rural Design ROW Cost per Section Design Lane Mile(1) Distribution(2) $880,000 $730,000 34% 66% Weighted Average ROW Cost per Lane Mile ' Weighted ROW Cost per Lane Mile(3) $299,000 $482,000 $781,000 (1) ROW cost is estimated at 44% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in Table C-12 (Item b). (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) ROW cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 C-4 Impact Fee Update Study 2.10 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Construction County Roadways A review of construction cost data for recent local county roadway capacity expansion projects identified 12 improvements over the past five years. These 12 improvements (detailed in Table C-13) had a weighted average construction cost of approximately $1.80 million per lane mile. In addition to local data, a review of recently bid projects throughout the state of Florida was conducted. As shown in Table C-14, a total of 49 projects from 13 different counties provided a weighted average cost per lane mile of $2.18 million per lane mile. Based on this review, it was concluded that construction costs in Indian River County are lower than the costs observed elsewhere in the state. More specifically, roadways costs in Indian River County are approximately 83 percent of costs observed statewide. Due to the Targe amount of local data, the county roadway construction cost used to calculate the transportation impact fee was estimated at $1.80 million per lane mile for urban -design county roadways. Table C-6 Construction Cost Adjustment — County Roads Road Type Urban Design Rural Design Construction Cost per Lane Mileil� $1,800,000 $1,494,000 Section Design Distribution(2) 34% 66% Weighted Average Construction Cost per Lane Mile Weighted Constr. Cost per Lane Mi1e131 $612,000 $986,000 $1,598,000 1) Source: Table C-13. Rural design is estimated at 83% of urban design costs (see Table C-1) (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) Construction cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. State Roadways A review of construction cost data for recent local state roadway capacity expansion projects identified three improvements with an average construction cost of approximately $2.95 million per lane mile. • SR 5 (US 1) from S. of Oslo Rd to S. of Indian River Bend • SR 60 (Osceola Blvd) from W. of 82nd Ave to 66th Ave/CR 505 • SR 60 (Osceola Blvd) from W. of 1-95 to W. of 82nd Ave/CR 609 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 C-5 Impact Fee Update Study 2Zl Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study In addition to looking at local data, a review of recently bid projects located throughout the state of Florida was conducted. As shown in Table C-15, a total of 52 projects (including the three projects in Indian River County) from 26 different counties estimated a weighted average cost per lane mile of $2.44 million per lane mile. Due to the lower construction costs observed between local county roads and statewide county improvements, and the small sample size of local state road improvements, the estimated state road construction cost was adjusted downward to provide a conservative estimate for use in the impact fee calculation. This adjustment was based on the ratio of local county roadway improvements to statewide county roadway improvements, which, as previously mentioned, is 83 percent. Therefore, the weighted average construction cost per lane mile for all state road improvements (including local and statewide data) was adjusted by 83 percent. Based on this analysis, a construction cost of $2.00 million per lane mile for urban -design state roadways was used to calculate the transportation impact fee for Indian River County. Table C-7 Construction Cost Adjustment — State Roads Road Type Urban Design Rural Design Construction Cost per Lane Mile(1) $2,000,000 $1, 660,000 Section Design Distribution(23 34% 66% Weighted Average Construction Cost per Lane Mile Weighted Constr. Cost per Lane Mile(3) $680,000 $1,096,000 $1,776,000 1) Source: Table C-15. Rural design is estimated at 83% of urban design costs (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) Construction cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. Construction Engineering/Inspection County Roadways The CEI cost factor for county roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the CEI -to -construction cost ratios for county road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For county roadways, the CEI factors ranged from 4 percent to 14 percent, with a weighted average of 9 percent. For purposes of this update study, the CEI cost for county roads was calculated at 9 percent of the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-16 for additional information). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 C-6 Impact Fee Update Study LZ2 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-8 CEI Cost Adjustment — County Roads Road Type Urban Design Rural Design Weighted CEI CEI Cost per Lane Section Design Mile(1) Distribution(2l Cost per Lane Mile(3) $162,000 $134,000 34% 66% Weighted Average CEI Cost per Lane Mile $55,000 $88,000 $143,000 1) CEI cost is estimated at 9% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in Table C-16 (Item a). (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) CEI cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. State Roadways The CEI cost factor for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. This factor was determined through a review of the CEI -to -construction cost ratios for state road unit costs in previously completed impact fee studies throughout Florida. For state roadways, the CEI factors ranged from 8 percent to 17 percent, with a weighted average of 11 percent. For purposes of this update study, the CEI cost for state roads was calculated at 11 percent of the construction cost per lane mile (see Table C-16 for additional information). Table C-9 CEI Cost Adjustment — State Roads Road Type Urban Design Rural Design CEI Cost per Lane Section Design Weighted CEI Cost per Lane Mile(1) Distribution(2) Mile(3) $220,000 $183,000 34% 66% Weighted Average CEI Cost per Lane Mile $75,000 $121,000 $196,000 (1) CEI cost is estimated at 11% of construction cost based on recent TIF studies in Table C-16 (Item b). (2) Source: Appendix C, Table C-17 (Items c and d) (3) CEI cost per lane mile (Item 1) multiplied by the associated section design weight (Item 2) for each design type and added together. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County C-7 Impact Fee Update Study 'Z-7-3 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-10 Design Cost Factor - County & State Roads Year County Design County Roadways Constr. Design Ratio Design State Roadways Constr. Design Ratio 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 2012 Collier Citrus Highlands Marion Pasco Lake Flagler Volusia Leon Sumter Collier Polk Hillsborough/Tampa Collier Sarasota/North Port Osceola Orange City of Orlando Average $323,639 $361,774 $235,030 $185,333 $246,324 $232,882 $174,000 $291,696 $212,800 $178,960 $217,000 $95,400 $308,000 $119,560 $240,000 $371,196 $264,000 $288,000 $241,422 $2,558,546 $2,584,099 $1,678,785 $1,941,244 $3,079,051 $2,911,021 $1,740,000 $2,651,778 $2,660,000 $2,237,000 $3,100,000 $1,590,000 $2,800,000 $1,708,000 $2,400,000 $2,651,400 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $2,393,940 13% 14% 14% 10% 8% 8% 10% 11% 8% 8% 7% 6% 11% 7% 10% 14% 11% 12% 10% $349,643 $3,385,978 10% $400,432 $2,860,227 14% $347,326 $2,480,900 14% $154,643 $1,430,919 11% $427,112 $3,050,799 14% $318,412 $3,184,125 10% n/a $309,526 $3,095,258 10% $372,130 $3,383,000 11% $238,000 $2,380,000 10% $320,000 $3,200,000 10% $217,000 $2,170,000 10% $420,000 $3,500,000 12% $241,800 $2,418,000 10% $200,000 $2,000,000 10% $313,258 $2,847,800 11% n/a $319,000 $2,900,000 11% $309,268 $2,767,938 11% (a) Source: Recent impact fee studies constructed throughout Florida (b) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County C-8 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-11 Project # 05013 Description 17th Lane SW Right -of From 27th Ave -Way Factor — To 20th Ave Recent Bid Year 2008 County Road Status Completed Improvements Feature 2 to 3 Lanes Section Design Urban in Indian Length (Miles) 0.52 River Lanes Added 1 County Lane Miles Added 0.52 Right -of- Way Cost - Construction Costs $525,000 ROW/ Constr. (2) - 06026 20th Ave SW 21st St SW 17th Lane SW 2008 Completed 1U to 2D Lanes Urban 0.27 2 0.54- $1,886,715 06026 20th Ave SW 25th St SW 21st St SW 2009 Completed 0 to 2 Lanes Urban 0.25 2 0.50 06047 College Lane Rd Extension IRSC 66th Ave 2009 Completed Oto 2 Lanes Urban 0.50 2 1.00 - $1,700,000 - 01014 16th St 66th Ave 74th Ave 2009 Completed Oto 2 Lanes Urban 1.27 2 2.53 $664,258 $3,109,321 21% 06021 66th Ave 16th St SR 60 2009 Completed 0 to 3 Lanes Urban 0.51 3 1.53 $3,758,300 $2,504,423 150% 02025 53rd St Kings Hwy Lateral H Canal 2010 Completed 0 to 4 Lanes Urban 2.04 4 8.14 $3,221,638 $7,000,000 46% 02025 53rd St Lateral H Canal Indian River Blvd 2010 Completed 0 to 4 Lanes Urban 0.50 4 2.00 $1,500,000 $7,605,993 20% 06018 Oslo Rd, Ph. 11 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2011 Completed 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.20 3 3.60 $4,032,257 $4,531,822 89% 05004 Oslo Rd, Ph. III 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2012 Ongoing 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.15 2 2.30 $245,445 $3,812,202 6% 02031 66th Ave 4th St 16th St 2012 Ongoing Oto 2U/2D Rural 1.50 2/3 5.50 $765,946 $6,628,935 12% 06040 66th Ave SR 60 49th St 2012 Ongoing 2 to 4 Lanes Urban 3.05 2 6.10 $10,567,637 $20,773,389 51% Total 12.75 34.26 $24,755,481 $60,077,800 41% (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Right-of-way costs divided by construction costs Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County C-9 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-12 Right -of -Way Factor — County & State Roads Year County ROW County Roadways Constr. Design Ratio ROW State Roadways Constr. Design Ratio 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 2012 Collier Citrus Highlands Marion Pasco Lake Flagler Volusia Leon Sumter Collier Polk Hillsborough/Tampa Collier Sarasota/North Port Osceola Orange City of Orlando Ave rage $1,751,790 $784,599 $468,853 $1,005,123 $814,517 $599,185 $460,000 $858,109 $1,120,000 $802,000 $1,300,000 $1,491,000 $1,500,000 $901,000 $620,000 $1,087,074 $1,080,000 $1,080,000 $984,625 $2,558,546 $2,584,099 $1,678,785 $1,941,244 $3,079,051 $2,911,021 $1,740,000 $2,651,778 $2,660,000 $2,237,000 $3,100,000 $1,590,000 $2,800,000 $1,708,000 $2,400,000 $2,651,400 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $2,393,940 68% 30% 28% 52% 26% 21% 26% 32% 42% 36% 42% 94% 54% 53% 26% 41% 45% 45% 41% $1,751,790 $3,385,978 52% $949,979 $2,860,227 33% $507,500 $2,480,900 20% $868,908 $1,430,919 61% $1,560,714 $3,050,799 51% $1,462,133 $3,184,125 46% n/a $954,543 $3,095,258 31% $1,363,000 $3,383,000 40% $1,400,000 $2, 380,000 59% $1,300,000 $3,200,000 41% $550,000 $2,170,000 25% $2,500,000 $3,500,000 71% $901,000 $2,418,000 37% $800,000 $2,000,000 40% $1,167,598 $2,847,800 41% n/a $1,305,000 $2,900,000 45% $1,208,885 $2,767,938 44% (a) Source: Recent impact fee studies constructed throughout Florida (b) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County C-10 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-13 Construction Cost — Recent County Road Improvements in Indian River County Project # Description From To Bid Year Status Feature Section Design Length Lanes (Miles) Added Lane Miles Added Right -of- Way Cost Construction Costs Construction Cost per Lane Mile 05013 17th Lane SW 27th Ave 20th Ave 2008 Completed 2 to 3 Lanes Urban 0.52 1 0.52 - $525,000 $1,009,615 06026 20th Ave SW 21st St SW 17th Lane SW 2008 Completed 1U to 2D Lanes Urban 0.27 2 0.54- $1,886,715 $3,773,430 06026 20th Ave SW 25th St SW 21st St SW 2009 Completed 0 to 2 Lanes Urban 0.25 2 0.50 06047 College Lane Rd Extension IRSC 66th Ave 2009 Completed Oto 2 Lanes Urban 0.50 2 1.00 - 51,700,000 $1,700,000 01014 16th St 66th Ave 74th Ave 2009 Completed Oto 2 Lanes Urban 1.27 2 2.53 $664,258 $3,109,321 $1,228,981 06021 66th Ave 16th St SR 60 2009 Completed Oto 3 Lanes Urban 0.51 3 1.53 $3,758,300 $2,504,423 $1,636,878 02025 53rd St Kings Hwy Lateral H Canal 2010 Completed Oto 4 Lanes Urban 2.04 4 8.14 $3,221,638 $7,000,000 $859,951 02025 53rd St Lateral H Canal Indian River Blvd 2010 Completed Oto 4 Lanes Urban 0.50 4 2.00 $1,500,000 $7,605,993 $3,802,997 06018 Oslo Rd, Ph. II 43rd Ave 27th Ave 2011 Completed 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.20 3 3.60 $4,032,257 $4,531,822 $1,258,839 05004 Oslo Rd, Ph. III 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2012 Ongoing 2U to 4D Lanes Urban 1.15 2 2.30 $245,445 $3,812,202 $1,657,479 02031 66th Ave 4th St 16th St 2012 Ongoing Oto 2U/2D Rural 1.50 2/3 5.50 $765,946 $6,628,935 $1,205,261 06040 66th Ave SR 60 49th St 2012 Ongoing 2 to 4 Lanes Urban 3.05 2 6.10 $10,567,637 $20,773,389 $3,405,474 Total 12.75 34.26 $24,755,481 560,077,800 51,753,584 Used in Impact Fee Study:l3i 51,800,000 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Right-of-way costs divided by construction costs (3) The weighted average construction cost per lane mile was rounded for use in the impact fee calculation Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County C-11 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-14 Construction Cost - County Road Improvements from Other Jurisdictions throughout Florida County Collier District 1 • Description Santa Barbara Blvd Ext. Front Rattlesnake Hammock Rd To Davis Blvd Year 2008 Status Bid Feature Oto 6 Design Urban Length 2.006 Lanes Added Lane Miles Added 12.00 Construction Cost $12,035,894 Construction Cost per Lane Mile 51,002,991 Polk 1 Silver Connector Rd E.F. Griffin Rd US98 2008 Bid Oto 2 Urban 0.33 2 0.66 51,560,483 52,364,368 Polk 1 County Line Rd Ewell Ave Pipkin Rd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.20 2 2.40 53,993,892 51,664,122 Volusia 5 Debary Ave Deltona Blvd Providence Blvd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.84 2 3.68 57,405,914 52,012,477 Volusia 5 S. Williamson Blvd (Ph. 11) S. of Sabal Creek Blvd N. of Moody Bridge 2008 Bid 2to 4 Urban 1.91 2 3.82 511,109,225 52,908,174 Lake 5 CR 466 (Segment A) US 301 CR 319 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.00 2 2.00 $4,062,660 52,031,330 Hillsborough 7 40th St River Pines Apts Humphrey St 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.95 2 1.90 55,154,862 52,713,085 Hillsborough 7 Race Track Rd (Ph. l) Douglas Rd Linebaugh Ave 2008 Bid 2to 6 Urban 1.01 4 4.04 $10,099,911 52,499,978 Osceola 5 John Young Pkwy Carroll Orange Co. Line 2008 Bid 4to 6 Urban 0.85 2 1.70 53,230,000 51,900,000 Orange 5 CR 535 (Segments C and E) Ficquette Rd Butler Ridge Dr 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban L10 2 2.20 53,693,616 51,678,916 Orange 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd 5R417 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 040 2 0.80 52,803,484 53,504,355 Orange 5 Destination Pkwy International Dr Tradeshow Blvd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.71 2 1.42 53,017,443 52,124,960 Lee 1 Gladiolus Dr(Ph. l) A&W Bulb Rd Winkler Rd 2008 Bid 2to4/6 Urban 1.94 2/4 5.44 513,971,509 52,568,292 Lee 1 Gladiolus Dr (Ph. II) Pine Ridge Rd A&W Bulb Rd 2008 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.02 2 2.04 56,748,642 53,308,158 Charlotte 1 Toledo Blade Corridor North Port US 41 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Suburban 1.20 2 2.40 53,174,852 51,322,855 Orange 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Hiawassee Rd Clark 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.50 2 5.00 510,182,738 52,036,548 Orange 5 Woodbury Rd S. of SR50 Challenger Pkwy 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 0.65 2 1.30 54,088,942 53,145,340 Orange 5 Sand Lake Rd President's Dr FL MaII 2009 Bid 2to 4 Urban 1.00 2 2.00 56,020,755 53,010,378 Orange 5 Taft -Vineland Road Extension Central Florida Pkwy John Young Pkwy 2009 Bid 2to 4 Urban 0.70 2 1.40 54,462,535 53,187,525 Osceola 5 Narcoossee Rd US 192 Orange Co. Line 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 7.40 2 14.80 547,360,000 53,200,000 Osceola 5 Osceola Pkwy (Ph. l) FLTumpike Buenaventura Blvd 2009 Bid Oto 6 Urban 1.57 2 3.14 55,966,000 51,900,000 Osceola 5 Poinciana Blvd (Ph. ll) Crescent Lakes US 17/92 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.50 2 5.00 516,000,000 53,200,000 Osceola 5 Old Lake Wilson Rd (Ph. l) Livingston Rd Sinclair Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.30 2 4.60 514,720,000 53,200,000 Hillsborough 7 Bruce B. Downs Palm Springs Blvd Pebble Beach Blvd 2009 Bid 4to 8 Urban 7.20 4 28.80 540,575,305 51,408,865 Hillsborough 7 Race Track Rd (Ph. IV) Douglas Rd Hillsborough Ave 2009 Bid 2to6 Urban 0.56 4 2.24 54,397,412 51,963,130 Sarasota 1 Fruitville Rd (Ph. I) Tatum Rd Debrecen Rd 2009 Bid 2to 4 Urban 0.72 2 1.44 $4,355,796 53,024,858 Sarasota 1 Fruitville Rd (Ph. II) Cobum Rd Tatum Rd 2009 Bid 2to 4 Urban 1.26 2 2.52 58,557,904 53,395,994 Lee 1 Colonial Blvd (CR 884) 1-75 SR 82 2009 Bid 4to6 Urban 2.70 2 5.40 $14,576,393 52,699,332 Collier 1 0i1 Well Rd (Segment 2) Immokalee Rd Everglades Blvd 2009 Bid 2 to 4/6 Urban 5.05 2/4 10.92 516,759,586 51,534,761 Collier 1 Oil Well Rd (Segment 4) Oil Well Grade Rd W. of Camp Keais Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 6 Urban 4.72 4 18.88 517,919,244 5949,113 Orange 5 Alafaya Tr Avalon Park Blvd Mark Twain Blvd 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 3.83 2 7.66 518,918,599 52,469,791 Hillsborough 7 Boyette Rd (Ph. III) McMullen Rd Bell Shoals Rd 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 523,184,354 54,458,530 Broward 4 Bailey Rd NW 64th Ave / SW 81st Ave SR 7 (U5 441) 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.00 2 4.00 56,330,297 51,582,574 Lee 1 Six Mile Cypress Pkwy Daniels Pkwy S. of Winkler Rd Ext. 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 3.09 2 6.18 56,711,242 51,085,961 Charlotte 1 Piper Rd Henry 5t Jones Loop Rd 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Suburban 2.10 2 4.20 58,627,803 52,054,239 Sarasota 1 North Cattlemen Rd Richardson Rd Desoto Rd 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.55 2 5.10 512,153,584 52,383,056 Lee 1 Daniels Pkwy Chamberlin Pkwy Gateway Blvd 2011 Bid 4to 6 Urban 2.05 2 4.10 52,906,553 5708,915 Orange 5 Rouse Rd 5R 50 Corporate Blvd 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 529,380,249 55,650,048 Orange 5 CR 535 Seg. A Magnolia Park Ct SR 429 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.37 2 2.74 58,390,570 53,062,252 Osceola 5 Goodman Rd Tri -County Sand Mine Rd 2011 Bid Oto 2 Urban 3.53 2 7.06 57,060,000 51,000,000 Pinellas 1 Bryan Dairy Rd Starkey Rd(CR 1) 72nd St 2011 Bid 4to 6 Urban 1.47 2 2.94 510,327,383 53,512,715 Palm Beach 4 5R 806 (Atlantic Ave) W. of Lyons Rd Starkey Rd 2011 Bid 2to 4 Urban 0.80 2 1.60 55,307,643 53,317,277 Palm Beach 4 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd SR 80 N. of Sycamore Dr 2011 Bid 2to 4 Urban 4.30 2 8.60 59,733,669 51,131,822 Charlotte 1 Burnt Store Rd(Ph. I) U541 Notre Dame Blvd 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.40 2 4.80 513,512,394 $2,815,082 Palm Beath 4 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd MCanal S. of Orange Blvd 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.30 2 2.60 53,646,523 51,402,509 Polk 1 Kathleen Rd (CR35A) (Ph. 11) Galloway Rd Duff Rd 2012 Bid 2to 4 Urban 3.00 2 6.00 516,784,760 52,797,460 Polk 1 Bartow Northern Connector (Ph. 1) US 98 US 17/92 2012 Bid Oto 4 Urban 2.00 2 4.00 511,110,205 52,777,551 Volusia 5 Tymber Creek Rd SR40 Peruvian Ln 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 0.75 2 1.50 55,276,057 53,517,371 Collier 1 Collier Blvd (CR951) Golden Gate Blvd Green Blvd 2013 Bid 4to 6 Urban 2.74 2 5.48 521,392,039 53,903,657 Total 242.90 $528,758,921 52,176,858 Source: Roadway bids from recent impact fee studies throughout Florida as well as recent bids from the TOA Cost Database, with information having been provided by each respective County Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 C-12 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-15 Construction Cost -State Roads County Walton District 3 Description SR83(US 331) From 5630(11598) To S. end of Choctaw Bridge year 2008 Status Bid Feature 2to4 Design Urban Length 2.082 Lanes Added Lane Miles Added 4.16 Construction Cost 511649,363 Construction Cost Per Lane Mile 52,800,328 Hillsborough 7 US301(SR 43) 5. of Balm Rd N. of Gibsonton Rd 2008 Bid 2to6 Urban 6.03 4 24.12 555,702,777 52,309,402 Indian River 4 5R5(US S) S. of Oslo Rd S. of Indian River Bend 2008 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.70 2 340 514,953,562 54,398.106 Indian River 4 5R 60(Osceola Blvd) W. of 82nd Ave 66th Ave/CR505 2008 Bid 4to6 Urban 2.15 2 4,30 518,496,793 54,301,580 Orange 5 SR 50 Good Homes Rd Pine Hills Rd 2008 Bid 4 to 6 Urban 3.63 2 7.26 535,929,914 54,949,024 Leon 3 SR 10(Mahan Drive) Dempsey Mayo Rd Walden Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 3.10 2 6.20 518.083,510 52,916,695 Indian River 4 SR 60 (Osceola Blvd) W. of 1.95 W. of 82nd Ave/CR609 2009 Bid Oto 6 Urban 3.07 2 6.14 $7,366,557 51199,765 Sarasota 1 U5 301 Wood 5t Myrtle Ave 21109 gid 4 to 6 Urban 2.60 2 5.20 518,372,050 53,533,087 Sarasota 1 U5301 Myrtle Ave Desoto Rd 2009 Bid 4 t 6 Urban 1.00 2 2.00 58,293,271 54,146,636 Pasco 7 1541(5645) Tower Rd Ridge Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.84 2 5,68 512,685,027 52.233,279 Lee 1 5R739 US 41 (5. of Ali co) 51x Mlle Cypress Pkwy 2009 Bid 0to6 Urban 2.77 6 16.62 520,663,929 51,243,317 Manatee 1 U5301 Erie Rd ca 675 2009 Bid 4ta6 Urban 4.10 2 8.20 521,040,000 52,565,854 Marion 5 5R35(US 301) Sumter Co. Une 529'S. of CR 42 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.40 2 2.80 $3,596,000 51284,286 Miami -Dade 6 Perimeter Rd NW 72 Avenue NW57Avenue 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.50 2 3.00 56,383,286 52,127,762 Polk 1 LIS27 N. of CR 5A6 S. of5R544 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.56 2 3.12 54,100,069 51,314,125 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) N. of CS% R/R Bridge S. of Commerce Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.98 2 196 $5,621,006 52,867,860 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) Gulf Rd SR10(US 90) 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.78 2 3.56 59,150,183 52,570,388 St. Lude 4 5R 70 MP 5.860 MP 10.216 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 4.36 2 8.72 512,426,020 51425,002 Sumter 5 SR35(US 301) N. of CR 204 Marion County Line 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.51 2 3.02 53,856,688 51277,049 Washington 3 SR79 N. Environmental Rd Strickland Rd 2009 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.72 2 3.44 58,877,323 52,580,617 lake 5 SR 50 E. of Grand Hwy W. of Hancock Rd 2010 Bid 4 to 6 Urban 1.30 2 2.60 54,689,633 51,803,705 Polk 1 SR 559 Extension SR 655 (Recker Hwy) Derby Ave 2010 Bid Oto2 Urban 0.69 2 1.38 52,751,592 51,993,907 Santa Rasa 3 SR 281 (Avalon Blvd) SR8(1-10) S. of Moors Lodge 2010 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.85 2 1.70 $5,378,226 53,163,662 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281(Avalon Blvd) 5. of Moor's Lodge N. of CS%R/R Bridge 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 1.48 2 2.96 57,145,212 52,413,923 Lee 1 LIS 41 Corkscrew Rd San Carlos Blvd 2018 Bid 4 to 6 Urban 4.48 2 8.96 512.822,677 51431102 Polk 1 135 98 5. of Manor Dr N. of CR 5804 2010 Bid 4 to 6 Urban 3.32 2 6.64 511,092,909 51,670,619 St. Wde 4 SR 70 Okeechobee County Une MP 5.871 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban 5.87 2 1174 518,782,630 51,599,883 Polk 1 US98 (Bartow Hwy) Brooks51 Edgewood Dr 2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 0.72 2 1.44 54,341,917 53,015,220 Hillsborough 7 CR 39/Alexander St N. of 1-4 N. of Knights Griffin 2011 Bid 0to4 Urban 3.19 4 12.76 514,782,862 51,158,532 Pinellas 7 SR 688(UI merton Rd) E. of 11921)51 W. of Seminole Bypass 2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.50 2 3.00 $16,908,929 55,636,310 Polk 1 SR60(Van Fleet) W. of US 98/Broadway W. of US 17 (SR 555) 2011 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.86 2 1.72 59,540,473 55,546,787 Lake 5 56 500(85 441) Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Lake Ella Rd 2011 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.25 2 6.50 $16,278,889 52,504,444 Hillsborough 7 SR574(MLK Blvd) W. of Highvlew Rd E. of Parsons Ave 2011 Bid 3to5 Urban 0.91 2 1.82 57,147,510 53,927,203 Collier 1 SR 84 (Davis Blvd) E. of Santa Barbara Blvd W. of Radio Rd 2012 Bid 2to6 Urban 1.77 4 7.08 510,956,198 51,547,486 Votusia 5 SR415 Seminole Co. Une Reed Ellis Rd 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.26 2 4.53 518,718,637 54,132,149 Votusla 5 58415 Reed Ellis Rd 0.3 miles N. of Acorn Lake 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 5.07 2 10.13 518,388,845 51,815,286 Pinellas 7 US19(SR 55) N. of CR 576/Sunset Pnt S. of Countryside Blvd 2012 Bid 61010 Urban 1.76 4 7.04 517,196,050 52,442,621 Miami -Dade 6 SR823/NW57th Ave W.23rdSt W. 46th St 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.48 2 2.96 514,081,161 54,757,149 Hernando 7 SR 50 (Cortez Blvd) US19)5R55) W. of CR 587/Mariner Blvd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 6.02 2 12.01 539,444,222 53,276,098 Orange 5 5R50 E. of West Oaks Mall W. of Good Homes Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 0.45 2 0.90 58,694,472 59,660,524 Clay 2 5623 Oakleaf Plantation Pkwy Old Jennings 2012 Bid 0to2 Urban 3.14 2 6.28 513,231,111 52,106,865 Hendry 1 5880 Birchwood Pkwy Dalton lane 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 5.00 2 10.00 512,855,092 51,285,509 Hendry 1 5R80 CR833 LIS27 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 2.50 2 5.80 58,117,039 51,399,489 Lee 1 58739 Winkler Ave Hanson St 2012 Bid 0to6 Urban 1.34 6 6.04 514,025,932 51,744,519 Seminole 5 SR434 1-4 Rangellne Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 1.80 2 3.60 510,111,333 52,808,704 Palm Beach 4 5R710/Beeline Hwy W. of Congress Ave W. of Australian Ave 2012 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.84 2 1.68 512,189,533 57,255,674 Polk 1 U527 N. of Ritchie Rd 5. of Barry Rd 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.20 2 6.40 514,242,918 52,225,456 Polk 1 U598(SR 35/5R 700) N. of CR 540A 58540 2012 Bid 4to6 Urban 3.45 2 6.90 518,004,051 52,609,283 Brevard 5 58 5 (US 1) N. of Pine St N. of Cldco Rd 2012 Bid 4 to 6 Urban 3.84 2 7.68 529,360,536 53,822,986 Brevard 5 SR 507 (Babcock St) Melbourne Ave Fee Ave 2013 Bid 2to4 Urban 0.40 2 0.80 55,167,891 56,459,864 Hillsborough 7 5R41(US 301) 5. of Tampa Bypass Canal N. of Fowler Ave 201.3 Bid 2to4 Suburban 1.81 2 3.61 515,758,965 54,365,361 Lee 1 US 41 Business Littleton Rd SR739 2013 Bid 2to4 Urban 1.23 2 2.46 58,488,393 53,450,566 Total 294.05 5717,943,565 52,441570 Total (Adjusted Indian River County Cost per Lane Mile) 8396 $2,000,0110 Source: FDOT recently -bid projects by transportation district, available at www.dot.state.fl.us/ Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 C-13 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-16 Construction Engineering/Inspection Factor — County & State Roads Year County CEI County Roadways Constr. CEI Ratio CEI State Roadways Constr. CEI Ratio 200 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2010 2011 2012 2012 Collier Citrus Pasco Lake Flagler Volusia Leon Sumter Collier Polk Hillsborough/Tampa Collier Sarasota/North Port Osceola City of Orlando Average $294,054 $180,887 $215,534 $116,441 $174,000 $238,660 $372,400 $223,700 $186,000 $111,300 $308,000 $119,560 $216,000 $265,140 $215,834 $2,558,546 $2,584,099 $3,079,051 $2,911,021 $1,740,000 $2,651,778 $2,660,000 $2,237,000 $3,100,000 $1,590,000 $2,800,000 $1,708,000 $2,400,000 $2, 651,400 $2,400,000 $2,466,931 11% 7% 7% 4% 10% 9% 14% 10% 6% 7% 11% 7% 9% 10% n/a 9% $354,442 $3,385,978 10% $474,464 $2,860,227 17% $442,849 $3,050,799 15% $318,412 $3,184,125 10% n/a $309,526 $3,095,258 10% $270,640 $3,383,000 8% $238,000 $2,380,000 10% $320,000 $3,200,000 10% $217,000 $2,170,000 10% $315,000 $3,500,000 9% $241,800 $2,418,000 10% $180,000 $2,000,000 9% $313,258 $2,847,800 11% $2,900,000 n/a $307,338 $2,882,707 11% (a) Source: Recent impact fee studies constructed throughout Florida (b) Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County C-14 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Roadway Capacity As shown in Table C-17, the average capacity per lane mile was based on the projects in the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. This listing of projects reflects the mix of improvements that will yield the vehicle miles of capacity (VMC) that will be built in Indian River County. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 C-15 Impact Fee Update Study 2.3 Indian River County ) Impact Fee Update Study Table C-17 Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Jurisdiction Description (County/State) Cost Feasible Plan Lane Vehicle Miles Lanes Initial Future Added From To Improvement Length Added Miles Capacity of Capacity Added p y Capacity Capacity Added State US 1 Highland Dr St. Lucie Co. Line Oto 6 0.62 2 1.20 39,800 59,900 20,100 12,462 State US 1 53rd St CR 510 4to 6 4.30 2 8.60 39,800 59,900 20,100 86,430 County CR 510 CR 512 66th Ave 2 to 4 4.20 2 8.40 14,580 31,950 17,370 72,954 County CR 510 66th Ave US 1 2 to 4 1.60 2 3.20 14,580 31,950 17,370 27,792 County CR 510 US 1 Intercoastal Waterway 2 to 4 0.50 2 1.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 8,685 County CR 512 1-95 Willow St 2 to 4 3.10 2 6.20 12,780 27,360 14,580 45,198 County Oslo Rd 1-95 58th Ave 2 to 4 3.60 2 7.20 14,580 31,950 17,370 62,532 County 43rd Ave St. Lucie Co. Line Oslo Rd 2 to 4 2.00 2 4.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 39,780 County 43rd Ave Oslo Rd 16th St 2 to 4 3.00 2 6.00 20,149 35,820 15,671 47,013 County 66th Ave 41st St 69th St 2 to 4 3.50 2 7.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 60,795 County 66th Ave 69th St CR 510 2 to 4 2.00 2 4.00 14,580 31,950 17,370 34,740 County 66th Ave CR 510 Barber St 2 to 4 0.85 2 1.70 14,580 31,950 17,370 14,765 County 82nd Ave 26th St 69th St 0 to 2 5.00 2 10.00 0 14,580 14,580 72,900 County 82nd Ave 69th St CR 510 Oto 2 2.00 2 4.00 0 15,930 15,930 31,860 County 82nd Ave CR 510 Laconia St 0 to 2 0.60 2 1.20 0 15,930 15,930 9,558 County Roseland Rd CR 512 US 1 2 to 4 4.70 2 9.40 15,930 35,820 19,890 93,483 County Indian River Blvd 20th St Merril Barber Bridge 4to 6 1.00 2 2.00 35,820 53,910 18,090 18,090 County Indian River Blvd Merril Barber Bridge 45th St Oto 6 2.00 2 4.00 35,820 53,910 18,090 36,180 County 25th St SW 27th Ave 58th Ave 2 to 4 1.80 2 3.60 15,930 35,820 19,890 35,802 County 26th St 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2 t 4 1.00 2 2.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 19,890 County 27th Ave Oslo Rd St. Lucie Co. Line 2 to 4 2.00 2 4.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 39,780 County 4th St 66th Ave 98th Ave Oto 2 4.10 2 8.20 0 14,580 14,580 59,778 County 12th St 58th Ave 66th Ave 0 to 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 53rd St 58th Ave 66th Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 53rd St 66th Ave 82nd Ave Oto 2 2.00 2 4.00 0 15,930 15,930 31,860 County 69th St 66th Ave Fellsmere N -S Rd 1 0 to 2 7.00 2 14.00 0 14,580 14,580 102,060 County 58th Ave Oslo Rd St. Lucie Co. Line Oto 4 2.10 4 8.40 0 35,820 35,820 75,222 County 74th Ave 8th St Oslo Rd 0 to 2 2.00 2 4.00 0 15,930 15,930 31,860 County 98th Ave 8th St 4th St Oto 2 0.50 2 1.00 0 15,930 15,930 7,965 County 5th St SW Old Dixie Hwy 20th Ave Oto 2 1.40 2 2.80 0 15,930 15,930 22,302 Unfunded Needs.. - State US 1 CR 510 Shuman Dr 4 to 6 3.00 2 6.00 39,800 59,900 20,100 60,300 State US 1 Shuman Dr CR 512 4to 6 1.60 2 3.20 39,800 59,900 20,100 32,160 County CR510 SRAIA Intercoastal Waterway 2to4 0.80 2 1.60 14,580 31,950 17,370 13,896 County CR 512 1-95 CR 510 4to 6 2.60 2 5.20 31,950 48,150 16,200 42,120 County 26th St 58th Ave 66th Ave 2 to 4 1.00 2 2.00 15,930 35,820 19,890 19,890 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 C-16 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table C-17 (continued) Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Lane Vehicle Miles Jurisdiction Lanes Initial Future Added Description From To Improvement Length Miles of Capacity (County/State) Added Added Capacity Capacity Capacity Added Unfunded Needs County Fellsmere N -S Rd 1 CR 512 69th St Oto 2 3.50 2 7.00 0 12,780 12,780 44,730 County Fellsmere N -S Rd 2 CR 512 69th St Oto 2 3.50 2 7.00 0 12,780 12,780 44,730 County Fleming St Airport Perimeter Rd CR 512 Oto2 1.30 2 2.60 0 14,580 14,580 18,954 County Airport Perimeter Rd US 1 Roseland Rd Oto 2 2.40 2 4.80 0 14,580 14,580 34,992 County Fellsmere E -W Rd CR 512 Fellsmere N -S Rd 2 Oto 2 3.70 2 740 0 12,780 12,780 47,286 County 33rd St 66th Ave 74th Ave 0 to 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 33rd St 74th Ave 82nd Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 74th Ave 26th St 33rd St 0 to 2 0.50 2 1.00 0 15,930 15,930 7,965 County 12th St 66th Ave 74th Ave Oto 2 1.00 2 2.00 0 15,930 15,930 15,930 County 1st St SW 58th Ave 82nd Ave 0 to 2 3.00 2 6.00 0 15,930 15,930 47,790 County 5th St SW 58th Ave 82nd Ave 0 to 2 3.00 2 6.00 0 15,930 15,930 47,790 County 13th St SW 20th Ave 58th Ave Ota 2 2.50 2 5.00 0 15,930 15,930 39,825 County 17th St SW 20th Ave 58th Ave 0 to 2 2.50 2 5.00 0 15,930 15,930 39,825 Total (All Roads : 220.90 1,823,639 County Roads: 201.90 91% (a) 1,632,287 State Roads: 19.00 9% (b) 191,352 Urban Section Design: 74.20 34% (c) Rural Section Design: 146.70 66% (d) Source: Indian River County 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Note: Letter references (i.e., "a") are used to assist with footnotes and sourcing Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County C-17 Impact Fee Update Study Appendix D Transportation Impact Fee Credit Component Calculations 2341 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Credit Component This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the credit component. Currently, in addition to the capital support that ultimately results from State fuel tax revenues, Indian River County also receives financial benefit from several other funding sources. Of these, County fuel taxes that are collected in Indian River County are listed below, along with a few pertinent characteristics of each. 1. Constitutional Fuel Tax (2C/gallon) • Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. Collected in accordance with Article XII, Section 9 (c) of the Florida Constitution. • The State allocated 80 percent of this tax to Counties after first withholding amounts pledged for debt service on bonds issued pursuant to provisions of the State Constitution for road and bridge purposes. • The 20 percent surplus can be used to support the road construction program within the county. • Counties are not required to share the proceeds of this tax with their municipalities. 2. County Fuel Tax (1C/gallon) • Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. • Primary purpose of these funds is to help reduce a County's reliance on ad valorem taxes. • Proceeds are to be used for transportation -related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Authorized uses include acquisition of rights-of-way; the construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance, and repair of transportation facilities, roads, bridges, bicycle paths, and pedestrian pathways; or the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. • Counties are not required to share the proceeds of this tax with their municipalities. 3. 1s Local Option Tax (up to 6C/gallon) • Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. • Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. • To accommodate statewide equalization, all six cents are automatically levied on diesel fuel in every county, regardless of whether a County is levying the tax on motor fuel at all or at the maximum rate. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 D-1 Impact Fee Update Study 23S Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Proceeds are distributed to a county and its municipalities according to a mutually agreed upon distribution ratio, or by using a formula contained in the Florida Statutes. Each year, the Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research (EDR) produces the Local Government Financial Information Handbook, which details the estimated local government revenues for the upcoming fiscal year. Included in this document are the estimated distributions of the various fuel tax revenues for each county in the state. The 2013-14 data represent projected fuel tax distributions to Indian River County for the upcoming fiscal year. In the table, the fuel tax revenue data are used to calculate the value per penny (per gallon of fuel) that should be used to estimate the "equivalent pennies" of other revenue sources. Table D-1 shows the distribution per penny for each of the fuel levies, and then the calculation of the weighted average for the value of a penny of fuel tax. The weighting procedure takes into account the differing amount of revenues generated for the various types of gas tax revenues. The weighted average figure of approximately $0.74 million estimates the annual revenue that one penny of gas tax generates in Indian County. Table D-1 Estimated Fuel Tax Distribution Allocated to Capital Programs for Indian River County & Municipalities, FY 2013-1411 Amount of Levy Tax per Gallon Constitutional Fuel Tax $0.02 Total Distribution $1,592,578 Distribution Per Penny $796,289 County Fuel Tax $0.01 $701,978 $701,978 1st Local Option (1-6 cents) $0.06 $4,364,623 $727,437 Total $0.09 $6,659,179 Weighted Average(2) $739,909 (1) Source: Florida Legislature's Office of Economic and Demographic Research, http://edr.state.fl.us/content/local-government/reports/ (2) The weighted average distribution per penny is calculated by taking the sum of the total distribution and dividing that value by the sum of the total levies per gallon (multiplied by 100). Gas Tax Credit A revenue credit for the annual gas tax equivalent expenditures on roadway capacity expansion projects in Indian River County is presented below. The two components of the credit are as follows: Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 D-2 Impact Fee Update Study 23� Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • County gas tax equivalent pennies • State gas tax expenditures County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies A review of the County's historical roadway financing program (FY 2008-2013) and the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for FY 2014-2017 indicates that a combination of sales tax revenues, fuel tax revenues, impact fees, developer contributions, and grants are used to fund roadway capacity expansion projects. With the County's local option sales tax set to expire in 2019 and the re -adoption and dedication to transportation unknown, a sales tax credit was given only for programmed expenditures in the CIP. If the sales tax is re -adopted in 2019 or a different revenue source is allocated to transportation capacity to replace the sales tax revenues, these credit figures may need to be revised. As shown in Table D-2, Indian River County receives a credit of 5.6 pennies for the portion of non -impact fee revenues (excluding sales tax) dedicated to capacity expansion projects such as new road construction, lane additions, and intersection improvements. Table D-2 County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies (Excluding Sales Tax) Source Projected CIP Expenditures (FY 2014-2017)(�) Historical County Expenditures (FY 2008-2013)(2) Total Cost of Number of Projects Years $18,612,373 $22,996,416 $41,608,789 4 6 10 Revenue from 1 Pennyl3) $739,909 $739,909 $739,909 Equivalent Pennies(4) $0.063 $0.052 $0.056 (1) Source: Table D-5 (2) Source: Table D-5 (3) Source: Table D-1 (4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 3) divided by 100 As shown in Table D-3, Indian River County receives a credit of 11.1 pennies for the portion of non -impact fee revenues (sales tax ONLY) dedicated to capacity expansion projects such as new road construction, lane additions, and intersection improvements. In the impact fee calculation, this credit will only be applied for five years, as the sales tax will not be considered a recurring revenue source for transportation capacity improvements. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 D-3 Impact Fee Update Study 237 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table D-3 County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies (Sales Tax ONLY) Source Projected CIP Expenditures (FY 2014-2017)(1) Historical County Expenditures (FY 2008-2013)(2) Total Cost of Number of Projects Years $59,458,414 $22,319,296 $81,777,710 4 6 10 Revenue from 1 Penny(3) $739,909 $739,909 $739,909 Equivalent Pennies(4) $0.201 $0.050 $0.111 (1) Source: Table D-6 (2) Source: Table D-6 (3) Source: Table D-1 (4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 3) divided by 100 State Gas Tax Expenditures In the calculation of the equivalent pennies of gas tax from the State, expenditures on roadway capacity expansion spanning a 10 -year period (from FY 2009 to FY 2018) were reviewed. For calculation purposes, the 10 -year period was broken into two increments; historical (FY 2009-2013) and future (FY 2014-2018). Information on historical projects' funding and the future year estimates was obtained from the FDOT Work Programs and the County's FY 2014-2018 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The use of a 10 -year period, for purposes of developing a State credit for roadway capacity expansion projects, results in a stable credit, as it accounts for the volatility in FDOT spending in the county over short periods of time. The total cost of the capacity -adding projects for the five-year "historical" period and projected in the five-year Transportation Improvement Program are as follows: • FY 2009-2013 work plan equates to 20.5 pennies • FY 2014-2018 work plan equates to 10.5 pennies The combined weighted average over the 10 -year period of state expenditure for capacity - adding roadway projects results in a total of 15.5 equivalent pennies, which is a slightly higher state credit than what is observed in most other counties. Table D-4 documents this calculation. The specific projects that were used in the equivalent penny calculations are summarized in Table D-7. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 D-4 Impact Fee Update Study 2.38 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table D-4 Equivalent Penny Calculation for State Portion Source Projected TIP (FY 2014-2018)(1) Historical Work Program (FY 2009-2013)(2) Total Cost of Number of Projects Years $38,959,997 $75,954,895 $114,914,892 5 5 10 Revenue from 1 Penny(3) $739,909 $739,909 $739,909 Equivalent Pennies(4) $0.105 $0.205 $0.155 (1) Source: Table D-7, total cost of expansion projects (2) Source: Table D-7, total cost of expansion projects (3) Source: Table D-1 (4) Cost of projects divided by number of years divided by revenue from 1 penny (Item 4) divided by 100 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 D-5 Impact Fee Update Study 234 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table D-5 mprovement Plan Expenditures for Indian River County, FY 2007/08 to 2016/17 (excluding sales tax expenditures) Description Lane Addition (0 to 2) On/From/To Powerline Rd from Barber St to CR 510 FY 2007/08 5134,482 FY 2008/09 5478,904 FY 2009/10 50 FT 2010/11 $0 FY 2011/12 $0 FY 2012/13 50 FY 2013/14 $0 FY 2014/15 50 FY 2015/16 $0 FY 2016/17 $0 Total 5613,386 Lane Addition (0 to 2) 37th St from 58th Ave to 66th Ave 5558,218 -$4,341 $0 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $553,877 Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th Ave to Timber Ridge 51,202,748 $35,586 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $1,238,334 Lane Addition (Oto 2) College Lane Extension - IRSC 50 5400,000 $0 $0 50 $0 50 50 50 50 $400,000 Widen to 5 Lanes CR 512 from Sebastian River Middle to 1-95 $2,745,686 5107,391 520,067 $0 $0 50 $0 50 50 50 $2,873,144 Lane Addition (0 to 2) 16th St from 66th Ave to 82nd Ave 5512,500 5266,380 $878,005 5110,351 $0 50 $0 50 $0 $0 51,767,236 Lane Addition (1U to 2D) 20th Ave SW from 17th St to 25th St 519,662 5135 $837 5542,713 5153,032 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5716,379 Lane Addition (Oto 2) 66th Ave from 12th St to SR 60 $845,251 5927,608 545,119 $0 58,289 $0 50 50 50 $0 51,826,267 Widen to 5 Lanes 53rd St from Kings Hwy to US 1 $0 $0 $0 5270,231 50 $0 $0 50 50 $0 5270,231 Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th St to 43rd Ave $0 50 525,748 53,400 52,731 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $31,879 Widen to 3 Lanes 66th Ave from 4th Ave to 12th St 5100,000 50 $0 52,052 $0 5500,000 $0 50 $0 50 5602,052 Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 12th St to 18th St $0 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 5319,745 5500,000 53,500,000 $4,319,745 Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 18th St to 26th St $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 52,805,330 53,102,938 5653,580 50 $6,561,848 Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from SR 60 to 49th St $0 $0 $1,810,361 $0 $0 56,270,379 $0 $0 $0 $0 58,080,740 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 61st Dr to Indian River $0 $0 50 $0 $0 50 5130,780 $0 50 $0 5130,780 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 70th Ave to 61st Dr $0 50 50 $0 $0 5403,691 5700,000 5600,000 $0 5500,000 52,203,691 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from CR 512 to 70th Ave 50 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $400,000 5500,000 $1,900,000 $0 52,800,000 Right -of -Way Acquisition Miscellaneous 50 $0 50 $0 50 5500,000 5500,000 $500,000 5500,000 $500,000 52,500,000 Widen to 4 Lanes Oslo Rd from 43rd Ave to 58th Ave $0 50 $0 $0 $0 52,869,200 50 $0 50 $0 $2,869,200 Traffic Controllers Countywide $0 50 $0 50 $0 $100,000 $100,000 5100,000 $100,000 $100,000 5500,000 Traffic Fiber Optic Countywide £0 Sy z0 Si. ,$0 $5150,000 5150,000 5150,000 ,5150,000 $150,000 5750,000 Total $6,118,547 $2,211,663 52,780,137 $928,747 5164,052 $10,793,270 $4,786,110 $5,272,683 53,803,580 $4,750,000 $41,608,789 Historical and Future Time Period Totals - - - - 2008-2013: $22,996,416 - - - 518,612,373 - Source: Indian River County Planning Department Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County D-6 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Table D-6 Historical and Future Capital Improvement Plan Expenditures for Indian River County, FY 2007/08 to 2016/17 (sales tax expenditures ONLY) Description Lane Addition (oto 2) On/From/To Atlantic Blvd, W of 58th Ave FY 2007/08 $0 FY 2008/09 5140,889 FY 2009/10 50 FT 2010/11 $0 FY 2011/12 $0 FY 2012/13 $0 FY 2013/14 $0 FY 2014/15 50 FY 2015/16 50 FY 2016/17 $0 Total $140,889 Widen to 5 Lanes Oslo Rd from 27th Ave to Timber Ridge $21,303 $630 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 50 50 $21,933 Lane Addition (0 to 2) 16th St from 66th Ave to 82nd Ave $145,447 577,209 5327,197 5309,944 $0 50 $0 50 $0 50 5859,797 Widen to 3 Lanes 17th Ln from SW 20th Ave to 27th Ave 52,295 $49,462 $1,986 50 50 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $53,743 Widen to 5 Lanes 53rd St from Kings Hwy to US 1 $0 536,387 50 51,523,628 50 $0 50 $0 $0 50 51,560,015 Add Left Turn Lane/Traffic Signal 1st St SW @ 27th Ave 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $1,325,000 50 $0 $0 50 51,325,000 Add Left Turn Lane/Traffic Signal 1st St SW @ 43rd Ave $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $1,325,000 50 50 50 $0 $1,325,000 Add Left Turn Lane 20th Ave @ 16th St 50 $0 50 50 50 575,000 51,000,000 50 $0 $0 51,075,000 Add Right Turn Lane 37th 5t @ Indian River Blvd $0 $0 50 50 $0 5105,000 $0 50 $0 $0 5105,000 Widen to 4 Lanes 43rd Ave from 18th St to 26th St 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 52,179,834 54,453,580 $0 56,633,414 Add Left Turn Lane 45 St/58th Ave $0 $0 $0 50 $0 5100,000 5100,000 $100,000 $0 $0 5300,000 Add Left Turn Lane 45 St @ US 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $600,000 $0 5675,000 Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 33rd St 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 525,000 50 5800,000 5825,000 Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 37th St 50 $0 50 $0 50 $0 50 $25,000 50 5600,000 5625,000 Add Left Turn Lane 58th Ave @ 69th St 50 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 525,000 $0 5800,000 5825,000 Widen to 3 Lanes 66th Ave from 4th Ave to 12th St 50 50 $0 50 50 52,781,381 $0 $0 50 $0 $2,781,381 Lane Addition (Oto 2) 66th Ave from 12th St to SR 60 $0 50 553,079 50 5810,238 $2,027,084 $0 $0 50 $0 $2,890,401 Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from 77th St to Sebastian City Limits $0 50 $0 50 $0 50 $0 57,550,000 $500,000 $0 $8,050,000 Widen to 4 Lanes 66th Ave from SR 60 to 49th St $1,517,365 $1,479,765 $8,435 51,073,395 $372,177 54,600,000 $9,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $18,151,137 Add Left Turn Lanes 69th St @ US 1 $0 50 $0 50 $0 50 $0 525,000 50 5600,000 5625,000 Intersection Improvements 4th St @ 82nd Ave $0 $0 50 $0 50 5755,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 5755,000 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 6lstDrtoIndian River $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5400,000 57,300,000 510,500,000 $18,200,000 Widen to 4 Lanes CR 510 from 70th Ave to 61st Dr 50 $0 50 $0 50 $0 $0 50 54,700,000 $3,000,000 57,700,000 Intersection Improvements Miscellaneous 50 $0 $0 50 50 5600,000 5600,000 5600,000 $600,000 5600,000 53,000,000 Right -of -Way Acquisition Miscellaneous $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,500,000 Intersection Improvements Oslo Rd @ SR 60 $0 50 $0 50 $0 $25,000 50 $0 50 $0 525,000 Traffic Fiber Optic Countywide l0 a SO 4 a 5150,000 5150,000 5150,000 $150,000 5150,000 750000 Total 51,686,410 $1,784,342 $390,697 52,906,967 51,182,415 514,368,465 $11,525,000 511,579,834 $18,803,580 517,550,000 581,777,710 Historical and Future lime Period Totals - -- - 2008-201.3: 522,319,296 - - - $59,458,414 - Source: Indian River County Planning Department Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 D-7 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table D-7 • Proj 8 203879-1 Description New Road Construction FY Z009 - FY Z1118 Inman River county Fuu 1 Worlc rrogram On/From/To 82nd Ave from 26th St to CR 510 at i FY 2009 5142,341 ransportauon FY 2010 $132,786 improvement FY 2011 531,548 rrogram FY 2012 $45,415 - c-apaucy-r FY 2013 $47,443 apansiun FY 2014 53,650,022 rruJeua FY 2015 $8,045,507 FY 2016 $0 FY 2017 50 FY 2018 $0 Total $12,095,062 228583-2 Add Lanes & Reconstruct 5R 5/U5 1 from St. Lucie Co. Line to $ of Highland Dr $34,962 51,166 5164,904 514,451,369 5375,523 $0 50 50 50 50 515,027,924 2285834 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 5/U5 1 from 5 of Highland Dr to Sof Oslo Rd 51,986 $32,957 5247,278 512,419,012 $285,655 50 50 50 50 $0 512,986,888 228583-5 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from Sof Oslo Rd to 5 of Indian River Blvd $75,921 5391,440 $165,180 $72 53,322 50 50 $0 $0 $0 5635,935 228613-2 Traffic Signals Indian River County Enhance Traffic Signal System 5200,000 535,750 5111,181 $0 50 50 50 50 50 50 5346,931 228613-3 Traffic Signals Indian River County Countywide Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrades 50 50 50 $656,578 $0 50 50 $0 50 50 5656,578 228613-4 Traffic Signals Indian River County Countywide Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrades $0 $0 50 50 $0 50 $706,543 50 50 $0 5706,543 228627-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct SR 60/Osceola Blvd from W of 82nd Ave/CR 609 to 66th Ave/CR 615 51,143,945 515,786,537 51,635,891 5174,490 $0 50 $0 50 $0 50 518,740,863 228628-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct 5R 60/Osceola Blvd from W of 1-95 to W of 82nd Ave/CR 609 5791,639 54,050 $385,420 55,012,856 $5,000,000 50 50 50 $0 50 511,193,965 230872-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct 16/17th St from 500' W of 14th Ave to W of SR 5/US 1 $4,056,733 5168,834 $93,759 $249 50 50 50 50 $0 $0 54,319,575 404740-1 Traffic Signals Indian River County JPA Signal Maintenance & Ops on SHS 5103,457 $102,679 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 $0 5206,136 410348-2 Interchange (New) I-95/SR 9 @ Oslo Rd Interchange $369 50 559,529 51,154,840 57,350 $0 53,400,000 $0 50 50 $4,622,088 416418-1 Traffic Control Devices/System Indian River County Signal System Group 3 $3,068,999 579,254 $742 $0 $0 50 $0 50 $0 $0 53,148,995 422914-1 Add Turn tane(s) 17th St 5. of Indian River Blvd in Vero Beach 50 $0 599,833 51,150 50 $0 50 $0 50 $0 5100,983 425864-1 Add Turn Lane(s) Schumann Dr @ Barber St $0 50 50 50 $0 50 50 51,690,000 50 $0 51,690,000 425883-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct 66th Ave from SR 60 to 41st St 50 50 $0 55,709,602 $560,777 $0 $0 50 50 $0 56,270,379 427804-1 Traffic Signals Indian River City JPA Signal Maintenance & Ops on SH5 50 $0 5104,802 5107,576 5110,744 5114,600 5118,000 50 50 $0 5555,722 427804-2 Traffic Signals Indian River City JPA Signa 1 Maintenance & Ops on SHS 50 $0 50 50 50 $0 50 5121,600 $125,000 5129,000 5375,600 430214-1 Funding Action 82nd Ave from 26th St to CR 510 $0 50 $0 50 $0 50 $0 $2,835,946 51,801,947 52,749,141 $7,387,034 431521-1 Add Lanes & Reconstruct Oslo Rd from 5R 9/1-95 to 58th Ave 50 50 50 50 50 51,610,000 50 52,210,000 50 50 53,820,000 431724-1 Add lanes & Reconstruct SR 5/US 1 from 53rd St to CR 510 50 $0 50 $0 $11,000 $3,005,000 55,000 $0 51,910,000 50 54,931,000 431759-1 Intersection Improvement 5R 60 @ 43rd Ave $0 50 $0 $0 $0 50 51,708,759 51,120,000 51,169,000 $734,932 $4,732,691 433239-1 New Road Construction CR 512 50. 5J1 SQ $.Q, 5564 000 511 52 5-Q 5.1 52 5364.000 Total $9,620,352 $16,735,453 $3,100,067 $39,733,209 $6,765,814 $8,379,622 $13,983,809 57,977546 55,005,947 53,613,073 5114,914,892 Historical and Future lime Period Totals - - - 2009-2013: $75,954,895 - - - 2014-2018: $38,959,997 - Source: FDOT Gaming Reports for Indian River County and the FY 2014-2018 Transportation Improvement Program Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County D-8 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table D-8 Average Motor Vehicle Fuel Efficiency — Excluding Interstate Travel Other Arterial Rural Other Rural Other Urban Total Fuel Consumed Gallons @ 21.4 mpg 15,048,457,944 14, 928, 271, 028 65, 283,130, 841 95,259,859,813 Gallons @ 6.3 mpg 7, 343, 968, 254 5, 209, 206, 349 13,185, 555, 556 25,738,730,159 22, 392, 426,198 20,137, 477, 377 78, 468, 686, 397 120,998,589,972 Percent VMT @ 21.4 mpg Travel Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) @ 21.4 6.3 87% Other Arterial Rural 322,037,000,000 46,267,000,000 368,304,000,000 Other Rural 319,465,000,000 32,818,000,000 352,283,000,000 Other Urban 1,397,059,000,000 83,069,000,000 1,480,128,000,000 Total 2, 038,561,000,000 162,154,000,000 2,200,715,000, 000 Other Arterial Rural Other Rural Other Urban Total Fuel Consumed Gallons @ 21.4 mpg 15,048,457,944 14, 928, 271, 028 65, 283,130, 841 95,259,859,813 Gallons @ 6.3 mpg 7, 343, 968, 254 5, 209, 206, 349 13,185, 555, 556 25,738,730,159 22, 392, 426,198 20,137, 477, 377 78, 468, 686, 397 120,998,589,972 Percent VMT @ 21.4 mpg @ 6.3 mpg 87% 13% 91% 9% 94% 6% 93% 7% Total Mileage and Fuel 2,200,715 120,999 18.19 miles (millions) gallons (millions) mpg Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, HighwayStatistics 2011, Section V, Table VM -1 Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data - 2011 by Highway Category and Vehicle Tvoe htto://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ool icvi nformation/statistics .cfm Source: See Table D-9 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County D-9 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table D-9 Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data (2011) - By Highway Category and Vehicle Type" Published March 2013 TABLE VM -1 SUBTOTALS LIGHT DUTY LIGHT DUTY SINGLE -UNIT 2 -AXLE MOTOR- SINGLE -UNIT COMBINATION ALL MOTOR YEAR ITEM VEHICLES CYCLES BUSESI61 VEHICLES TRUCKSj31 TRUCKS ALL LIGHT 6 -TIRE OR MORE VEHICLES SHORTWB1�1 LONG WB1Z1 VEHICLES121 AND COMBINATION TRUCKS Motor -Vehicle Travel (millions ofvehicle-miles) 2011 Interstate Rural 140,603 1,243 1,670 42,961 9,495 47,616 ' 183,564 57,111 243,587 2011 Other Arterial Rural 232,385 2,814 1,981 89,651 16,945 29,321 322,037 46,267 373,099 2011 Other Rural 226,037 3,016 2,052 93,427 18,090 14,729 319,465 32,818 357,351 2011 All Rural 599,026 7,073 5,703 226,040 44,530 91,666 825,065 136,196 974,038 2011 Interstate Urban 341,865 2,134 2,112 82,652 14,126 33,815 424,517 47,942 476,704 2011 Other Urban 1,102,519 9,293 5,967 294,541 44,859 38,210 1,397,059 83,069 1,495,389 2011 All Urban 1,444,384 11,427 8,079 377,193 58,985 72,026 1,821,576 131,011 1,972,094 2011 Total Rural and Urban(5) 2,043,409 18,500 13,783 603,232 103,515 163,692 2,646,641 267,207 2,946,131 2011 Number of motor vehicles registeredtZt 192,513,278 8,330,210 666,064 41,328,144 7,819,055 2,451,638 233,841,422 10,270,693 253,108,389 2011 Average miles traveled per vehicle 10,614 2,221 20,693 14,596 13,239 66,768 11,318 26,016 11,640 2011 Person -miles oftravel (4) 2,839,083 19,927 292,192 805,888 103,515 163,692 3544,971 267,207 4,224,297 (millions) 2011 Fuel consumed 88,536,602 425,410 1,932,823 35,325,791 14,183,270 28,193,355 123,862,392 42,376,625 168,597,250 (thousand gallons) 2011 Average fuel consumption per vehicle (gallons) 460 51 2,902 855 1,814 11,500 530 4,126 666 2011 Average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed 23.1 43.5 7.1 17.1 7.3 5.9 21.4 6.3 17.5 MV -9, and MV -10), other data such as the R.L. Polk vehicle data, and a host of modeling techniques. F0r2011, changes in a couple of States' truck VMT substan iallyimpacted national truck VMT trends. Upon further review with the States involved, FHWA still considers these changes as material fact. However, FHWAwill conduct further analysis when the 2012 data are reported bythe States in 2013. (2) Light Duty Vehicles Short WB - passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles with a wheelbase (WM) equal to or less than 121 inches. Light DutyVehicles Long WB - large passenger cars, vans, pickup trucks, and sport/utility vehicles with wheelbases (WB) larger than 121 inches All Light Duty Vehicles - passengercars, light trucks, vans and sport utilityvehicles regardless of (3) Single -Unit -single frame trucks that have 2 -Axles and at least 6 tires ora gross vehicle weight rating exceeding 10,000lbs. (4) Vehicle occupancy is estimated by the FHWAfrom the 2009 National Household Travel Survey(NHTS); For single unit truck and heavy trucks, 1 motor vehicle mile travelled = 1 person -mile traveled. (5) VMT data are based on the latest HPMS data available, it may not match previous published results. (6) The change in the number of buses is primarilydue to the decline of reported public operated school buses. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 D-10 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Appendix E Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule ZuS Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table E-1 Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Gasoline Tax Unit Cons'nution Cost: 52,591,000 Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor. 17.3% $$ per gallon to capital: 50.211 50.111 County Rev (No 5T): 50.056 Capacity per lane mile: 8,255 Cost per VMC. $313.87 Facility life (years): 25 5 County Rev IST): 50.111 Fuel Efficiency: 18.19 mpg Adminlstrath a Fee: 2.5% Interest rate: 2.5% 2.5% State Revenues: 50.155 Effective& • r ar. 365 _ 2009 ITE Assessable Total Trip Total impact Annual Gas Gas Taw Annual Sales Tax Net lmpazl % LUC Land Use Unit Trip Rate Trip Rate Source Tan Trip Length Length Trip length Source %New Trips %New Trips Source Not VMT1�l Cost Tax Credit Sales Tax Credit cowl Credit Fee AF4411nd Change +43I1 RE52DENML:?aM✓A ._ .. , .. .. x . ,. .: i` S ku`-'n•*"ucares. mzcAas 'a wsa -.deli a.+»4`[,t-£.110FYhAs a3sa",,.'•.,^ea: lsesn.. �v C?+ANe+is.^.`S`bd>t's tieaey!'.n.:-ss:..'.8.,.,•.-;i•-1,;,I<s:'...:._, '89 nI:f.=+ r fR:!.c+9,1T 1 210 Angle Family (Detached) du Less than 1,000 sl du 5.78 Ft Studies (0915, ANS, Cereus) 6.62 7.12 n Studies 100% N/A 15.82 54,966 587 $1,603 546 5214 51,817 53,149 52,974 696 1000 to 1 499 sf du 6.52 Ft Studies (N1R5, AHS, Census) 6.62 7.12 FL Studies 10096 N/A 17.85 55,602 S98 $1806 552 $242 52.048 53,554 52 974 20% 1,500162,49989 du 7.81 Fl Studies (WITS, 4115, Census) 6.62 7.12 FL Studies 100% N/A 21.38 56,710 $118 52,174 562 5288 52,462 $4,248 54,483 -5% 2500sf or larger du 9.20 FL studies (MRS, AHS, Cereus) 6.62 7.12 FL Studies 10096 N/A 25.18 57,901 5139 52,861 573 5339 52,900 55,004 55,031 -196 220 Multi.Fandly/Accessory Unit du 6.60 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 5.10 5.60 FL Studies (LUC 220/230) 100% N/A 13.92 $4,369 578 51,437 541 5190 51,627 52,742 52,428 1396 240 Mobile Home/RV (0,d down) du 4.17 FL Studies 4.60 5.10 FL Studies 100% N/A 7.93 $2,490 $45 5829 524 5111 5940 51,550 51,745 -1196 taws TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP:ia5Mia,4iank. 111:eVAVC: Mr•tN444s✓1MINGIP40.W's136S:t 'i...:...e".•rm......... ty,'_�,vs-:.s.'t 4._ lr..ii.x 0.o ..::e.....• M...X'x. ,-' ,:. <.."r.:=5.4ie.-J614 ' 1 - aa. .•' •Y, -, ....'.,a.,.r i.......,. .e ,t .8048 310 Hotel room 6.36 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 6.26 6.76 FL Studies 66% FL Studies 10.87 53,410 560 $1,105 532 5149 51,254 52,156 52,804 -23% 320 Motel room 5.63 ITE 9th Edition 4.34 4.84 FL5tudies 7796 FL Studies 7.78 52,442 544 5811 523 5107 5918 51,524 51,516 196 620 Nursing Home bed 2.76 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 2.59 3.09 FL Studies 8996 FL Studies 2.63 5826 516 5295 58 537 5332 5494 5432 1496 252 Assisted Care LMng Facility (ACLF) bed 2.97 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 3.28 3.78 FL Studies 72% Same as LUC 253 (see Appendix 8) 2.90 5910 517 5313 59 542 5355 $555 5620 -11% 6111141OFRCE & NNANCIAL.•[siirs-10 88 o,e3.sks ' m ` :,,A.0 r X.Mart`4s•.M3 • '..j.,0410` ar ••••.- ,«•.s:..0 :•.:te.o... ifr , .etth . ...[ 4-4. a ._ . J_ ...e.•.w'ter..vg a:,.,,,Ii.i_4...-w ,.,-1. N.a:r_'•cn*..tes.-,..Va:.- 40 4 e• .ak164.6- 1 2.,.�.,'e• 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf 23.83 FL Studies (Collier County)_ 5.55 6.05 71.5tudles 8996 FL Studies 48.67 515,277 5272 55,011 5143 5664 55,675 59,602 513,411 -28% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000,9 34.72 Blend RE 915 & FL Studies 5.55 6.05 FL Studies 8991 FL Studies 70.92 522,258 5396 57,296 5208 5966 56,262 513,996 513,411 4% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -1n") 1,000 sf 121.3D ITE 9th Edition 2.46 2.96 Same as LUC 912 46% Same as LUC 912 56.76 517,815 5350 56,449 5184 5855 $7,304 510,511 510,634 -196 922 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,00051 159.34 Blend R0 9th & 01 Studies 2.46 2.96 FL Studies 4696 FL Studies 74.56 $23,401 5459 58,457 5242 51,124 59,581 513,820 $13,020 6% 710 General Office 1,000 sf 11.03 RE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 FL Studies 92% F1.5tudl,s 21.61 $6,783 5121 52,229 564 5297 52,576 $4,257 53,798 12% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 RE 9th Edition 5.38 5.88 Same as LUC 770 (see Appendix Bl 89% Same as LUC 770 (see Appendix 6) 16.06 $5,040 590 51,658 547 5218 51,876 53,164 52,798 13% C'.L6'%INDUsToreLk:',rYR�o.W?...4,itlresa6...141!.1.1.&?._....,:++,. ...V '...a7*+.?ifs-,•..•,n02,0-enr..a.c',Ss-•...t.'= .90 .,'.rf.+: ,--- -. .:h _ .. .. _ ts��._ .....-=k7 :'�t,'*L's.4. `:C. 6.•.-..y.-dr`•:3ioWL, 140 Manufacturrg 1,000 sf 3.82 RE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 7.48 52,349 542 5774 522 5102 5876 51.473 51,318 1294 150 Warehousing 1,000 sl 3.56 ITE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 6.97 52,189 539 5719 521 598 5817 51,372 51,328 1296 151 MIN -Warehouse 1,000 sl 2.15 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 3.10 3.60 FL Schechdes 9296 Same as LUC 710 2.54 5796 515 5276 58 537 5313 $483 5862 -4496 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000 sl 1.68 RE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 3.29 51,033 518 5332 510 546 5378 5655 51,228 -4796 110 General Light industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 RE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 13.66 54,286 577 51,419 540 5186 51,605 52,681 52,404 12% n/a Concrete Plant acre 15.60 2005 IRC Impact Fee Study 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 30.56 59,593 5172 53,169 590 5418 53,587 56,006 55,382 1296 n/8 Sand Mining acre 2.00 2005 IRC Impact Fee St09 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 3.92 51,230 522 5405 512 556 5461 5769 5690 1196 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 E-1 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table E-1 (continued) Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule RE LUC Lund Use ... »RETAIL:' . • . , 1 „.F_ _,. 2009 Assessable Total Trip a Total Impact Annual Gas Gas Tax Annual Sales Tax otal Credit 955 Impact Adopted % Unit Trip Rate Trip Rate Source Trip Length Length Trip Length Source %New Trips %New Trips Source Net VMTI Cost Tax Credit Sales Tax Credit TCreditFee Fee.) Change ._ .....r ..-. _ __ .a.. .. ,�. _ -•R: `f-- ` 820 Retail 1,000 gsf 42.70 RE 9th Edition 2.64 3.14 FL Curve 73% FL Curve 34.03 510,680 5207 53,814 5109 5506 54,320 56,360 53,163 101% 944/ 946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 157.33 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 1.90 2.40 FL Studies 239; FL Studies 28.43 58,923 5184 53,390 597 $451 53,841 55,082 55,587 -9% 841 New/Used A010 Sales 1,000 sf 28.25 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 4.60 5.10 FL Studies 79% FL Studies 42.45 513,324 3241 54,440 5127 5590 55,030 $8,294 510,108 -18% 932 Restaurant 1,0005f 116.60 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 3.17 3.67 FL Studies 71% FL Studies 108.52 534,060 1643 511,847 $338 51,570 513,417 520,643 522,152 -7% 934 Fast Food Rest w/DrWo-Thnf 1,000 sf 511.00 Blend RE 9th & FL 5lrdies 2.05 2.55 FL Studies 58% FL Studies 251.23 578,855 51,600 529,479 5842 53,912 533,391 $45,464 $34,781 3196 850 Supermarket 1,000 sf 103.38 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 2.08 2.58 n Studies 56% 91 Studies 49.79 515,628 6316 65,822 5166 5771 56,593 59,035 511,179 -19% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf 31.43 Blend ITE 95h & FL Studies 3.62 4.12 FL Studies 72% FL Studies 33.87 510,632 5197 53,630 5104 $483 54,113 56,519 57,830 -17% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 43.94 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 2.18 2.68 FL 5tudles 68% FL studies 26.93 68,454 5170 23,132 589 $413 53,545 54,909 514,589 -66% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,0005f 775.14 Blend RE 9th & FL Studies 1.51 2.01 FL 6tudies 28% FL Studies 135.52 542,534 5924 517,024 5486 52,258 519,282 523,252 525,430 -9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 RE 9th Edition 6.09 6.59 FL Studies 64% FL Studies 6.88 52,160 538 5700 520 593 5793 51,367 51,373 0% .RECREATIONAL:' .........., .., . t .. 430 Golf Course hole 35.74 RE 9th Edition 6.62 7.12 Same as LUC 210 90% FL Schedules 88.05 527,636 5485 58,936 5255 51,185 510,121 517,515 511,248 56% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1000 sf 32.93 RE 9th Edition 6.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 94% FL Studies 65.92 520,690 5370 56,817 5195 5906 57,723 512,967 510,824 2E9i 412 County Park acre 2.28 RE 9th Edition 5.11 5.61 FL Schedules 90% FL Schedules 4.34 51,361 524 5442 513 560 5502 5859 5718 20% 491 Tennis Court court 38.70 RE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 94% Same as LUC 492 77.47 524,315 5435 58,015 5229 81,064 59,079 515,236 512,180 2596 420 Marina boat berth 2.96 RE 9th Frinton 6,62 7.12 Same as LLC 210 907E FL Schedules 7.29 52,289 540 5737 521 598 5835 51,454 $973 499E .cf ;.n GOVERNMENTAL:,.. 3, _ . .. .. ... , . ... .. ' ._ ... .. .- ..x.. ... . .. ., _ .. _ .. .. ._... . 732 Post Office 1,000 sf 108.19 RE 9M Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 35% 2009 IRC Tramp, Impact Fee Study 80.64 $25,310 $453 58,346 5238 51,106 $9,452 515,858 514,199 1296 590 Library 1,000 sf 56.24 ITE 9th Edition 6.62 7.12 Same as LUC 210 85% 2009 IRC Tramp. Impact Fee Study 130.86 541,072 5721 513,284 5379 51,761 515,045 526,027 517,925 45% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf 27.92 RE 9th Edition 5.15 5.65 Same as LUC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 54.70 517,169 5307 55,656 5162 5753 56,409 510,760 59,632 12% 571 loll bed 5.50 2005 IRC Impact Fee Study 5.15 5.65 Same as 1UC 710 92% Same as LUC 710 10.78 53,382 561 51,124 532 $149 01,273 52,109 5389 442% .. T. MISLEL14NEOUS:... .. -,,. .» •_x_ .. - s _.. _ . . ..• - e.. , .. - .. _ - ... .. _.v... _ •S,�f.i .s, .:.A..._ 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 71.88 Blend ITE 9th & FL 56045es 2.03 2.53 FL Studies 73% FL Studies 44.05 513,825 5281 55,177 5148 5688 55,865 57,950 58,847 -10% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf 13.22 RE 9th Edition 6.62 7.12 Same as LUC 210 7791 FL Schedules 27.86 58,746 5153 52,819 581 5376 53,195 55,851 55,309 5% 640 Veterinary Clinic•' 1,000 sf 40.12 ITE 9th Edition 5.10 5.60 Same as LUC 630 [See Appendix 8) 93% Same as LUC 630 (see Appendix 5) 78,68 524,697 5442 58,144 5233 51,082 59,226 515,471 53,511 341% 560 Church 1,000 sf 9.11 ITE 9th Edition 3.90 4.40 FL Schedules 90% FL Schedules 13.22 54,150 576 51,400 540 5186 51,586 52,564 52,588 -1% 444 Movie Theater w/Ma0nee screen 106.63 Blend RE 6th & FL Studies 2.22 2.72 F1.5tudies 88% 91. Studies 86.14 527,036 $540 59,949 5284 51,319 511,268 515,768 522,743 -31% 520 Elementary School (Prlvate,K6) student 1.29 RE 9th Edition 4.30 4.80 FL Schedules 80% 91.Schedldes 1.03 5576 510 5184 56 528 $212 5364 5149 144% 522 Middle School (P09410, 6-8) student 1.62 RE 9th Edition 4.30 4.80 FL Schedules 90% FL Schedules 2.59 5814 515 5276 58 537 5313 5501 5149 236% Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 E-2 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table E-1 (continued) Calculated Transportation Impact Fee Schedule ITE LUC 2009 Assessable Total Trip ,I Total Impact Annual Gas Gas Tax Annual Sales Ta" Net Impact Adopted Land Use Unit Trip Pate Trip Rale Source Trip Length Source %New Trips %New Trips Source Net VMT� Total Credit ped Change Trip Length Length Cost Tax Credit Sales Tax Credit Fee Feel', MISCELLANEOUS .. 530 High School (Pnvate, 9-12) student - 1.71 ITE 9th Edition 4.30 4.80 FL Schedules 9096 FL Schedules 2.74 5859 516 $295 58 537 5332 5527 5538 -2% 540/ 550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 ITE Regression Analysis 6.62 7.12 Same as LUC 210 90% FL Schedules 4.93 51,547 527 $497 514 565 5562 5985 5653 5196 n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf 5.40 2005 IRC Impact Fee Study 2.02 2.52 2009 IRC Transp. Impact Fee Study 89% 2009 IRC Transp. 1m1a08 Fee Study 4.01 51,260 $26 $479 513 560 5539 $721 5983 -2795 1) Net VMT is calculated as ((Trip Generation Rate` Trip Length' % New Tr'ps)•(1-Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor)/2). This reflects the unit of vehicle miles of capacity consumed per unit of development and i multiplied by the cost per vehicle 2) Source: Indian River County Planning Division. Fees do not include the administrative charge 3) The walk-in bank land use was added back into the ITE 9' edition handbook, as it was removed from ITE 8' edition. The recommended trip generation rate is based on the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4pm and 6pm) multiplied by 10 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the veterinary clinic is based on the peak hour of adjacent street traffic from ITE 9" edition, multiplied by 10 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 E-3 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Appendix F Building and Land Values Supplemental Information for Correctional, Law Enforcement, Emergency Services, Public Buildings, Library, Solid Waste and Parks and Recreation Impact Fees zy4 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study This Appendix provides a summary of building and land value estimates for all impact fee program areas with the exception of transportation and educational facilities. Information related to transportation cost estimates is included in Appendix C and cost estimates for educational facilities are included in Appendix G. Building Values For all of the program areas, the following information was reviewed to estimate building values: • Recent construction completed by Indian River County (if any); • Estimates for any planned facilities; • Insurance values of existing facilities; • Data from other jurisdictions for recently completed facilities; and • Discussions with architects/contractors. The following paragraphs provide a summary for each program area. Correctional Facilities As presented in Table F-1, the construction cost associated with the County's most recent jail addition (completed in 2008) was $288 per square foot. There are no estimates available for future jail additions, and the insurance values of the existing jail buildings ranged from $140 to $220 per square foot. It is important to note insurance values are considered to provide estimates below the full cost since they typically do not take into consideration certain building components, such as foundation, architectural/design cost, furniture/fixture/equipment, security features, etc. Recent jail construction in other Florida counties and estimates obtained from construction companies and architects suggested a range of $225 to $445 per square foot. Given all this information, a unit cost of $250 per square foot for jail buildings is used in the study. This figure is approximately 8 percent higher than that used in the 2005 study ($232 per square foot) and 22 percent lower that the figure used in the 2007 impact fee study ($321 per square foot). Given that the most recent jail construction in Indian River County was completed at a cost of $288 per square foot, $250 per square foot represents a conservative estimate. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-1 Impact Fee Update Study 2.57) Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-1 Correctional Facilities Building Value Source Construction of IRC Jail Unit 01 Year 2008 Building Cost per Square Foot $288 Estimates fora Future Jail N/A N/A Insurance Values of Existing Jail Buildings(2) 2013 $140- $220 Recent Jail Construction in Other Florida Counties(3) 2009, 2013 $225 Estimates from National Construction Companies(4) 2013 $270-$300 Estimates from Florida Architects(5) 2013 $285-$445 Used in the Study 1 2013 I $250 (1) Source: Indian River County (2) Source: Indian River County, figures rounded to nearest $10 (3) Source: AJAX Engineering and Florida Department of Correctional Facilities, figures rounded to nearest $10 (4) Source: Reed Construction (5) Based on discussions with industry architects for a range of a typical jail in Florida based on their experience To determine the building value of the support facilities, such as the guard house, maintenance shop, etc., insurance value of the existing buildings was reviewed. This analysis suggested a unit cost of $125 per square foot. Emergency Services Facilities As part of this analysis, TOA contacted several Florida jurisdictions to obtain more recent cost information. The bids and estimates received in 2010 for facilities built in 2010 or 2012 range from $190 to $300 per square foot (excluding furniture/fixture/equipment, site preparation cost, permits, fees and other similar expenses). The following chart presents the building construction cost trends based on bids, estimates, and other information obtained during the previous impact fee studies completed by TOA. As presented, the variation in station costs is relatively minor over the past few years. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-2 Impact Fee Update Study 2Sk Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 so Figure F-1 Fire/EMS Station Construction Cost per Square Foot f . 1 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Source: Fire station construction cost data collected from Florida jurisdictions In determining the appropriate unit cost for station construction in Indian River County, in addition to these trends, the following data was evaluated: • The most recent fire station expansion and renovation project cost was approximately $300 per square foot (Stations 9 and 12). • The County's current Capital Improvement Plan includes an estimate ranging from $280 to $325 for a prototype fire station. • The insurance value of existing fire stations is $190 per square foot, which is considered to be a conservative value. Based on the information summarized in Table F-2, a unit cost of $260 per square foot is used for fire station building value. This figure is based primarily on local construction cost and estimates in Indian River County and is also consistent with statewide trends. Finally, it is almost the same unit value used in the 2005 study and approximately 5 percent lower than that used in the 2007 study ($273 per square foot). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-3 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-2 Fire Station Building Value Source Expansion of Stations 9 and 12111 Year 2010 Building Cost per Square Foot $300 Estimates for Stations 13 and 14(2) FY 2013 - FY 2017 $280 to $325 Insurance Values of Existing Fire Stations(3) 2013 $190 Recent Fire Station Construction in Other Florida Counties(4) 2010-2012 $190- $300 Estimates from Florida Architects(5) 2013 $230 - $280 Used in the Study I 2013 I $260 (1) Source: Indian River County 2) Source: Indian River County Capital Improvement Plan 3) Source: Indian River County, figures rounded to nearest $10 4) Source: Individual jurisdictions (5) Based on discussions with industry architects for a range of a typical fire station in Florida based on their experience (includes adjustment for ff&e, site preparation, permits, etc.) In addition to fire stations, the Emergency Services building inventory includes the Training Tower, which was built in 2008. The tower was built for $150 per square foot, which is also used in the impact fee calculations. Law Enforcement Law enforcement buildings tend to include a wide range of buildings, such as office buildings, crime scene buildings, maintenance sheds, etc. In addition, law enforcement facilities tend to include both prime buildings and support buildings, which tend to vary significantly in terms of building cost. Given this, it is difficult to have a comparable cost database from other jurisdictions since the combination of these different types of buildings vary from one jurisdiction to another. Therefore, the estimates used in the impact fee calculations relied primarily on local data. As presented in Table F-3, the County recently completed the conversion of a warehouse to a Crime Scene Investigation Center, at a cost of almost $200 per square foot. In addition, the estimates obtained from the Sheriff's Master Plan for a future Sheriff's Office Building and a new Crime Scene Unit Facility range from $250 to $300 per square foot. The insurance values of existing buildings average $165 per square foot and the value of support facilities is $65 per square foot. Finally, the available data from other Florida jurisdictions suggests a range of $175 to $270 per square foot for law enforcement facilities. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-4 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Given this data, the value of prime buildings is estimated at $200 per square foot and the support buildings at $50 per square foot. The value for support buildings took into consideration the insurance values of not only law enforcement support buildings, but also those of public buildings, as presented in Table F-4. These unit figures provided a weighted average cost of $197 per square foot, which is 50 percent higher than the value included in the 2005 study, which was based on historical costs provided by the County and is the same value included in the 2007 study. Table F-3 Law Enforcement Building Value Source Construction of Crime Scene Investigation Center(1) Year 2013 Building Cost per Square Foot $197 Future Planned Facilities�1 N/A $250 to $300 Insurance Values of Existing Buildings (prime)131 2013 $165 Insurance Values of Existing Buildings (support)i4) 2013 $65 Recent Public Building Construction in Other Florida Counties(5) 2010-2012 $175 - $270 Used in the Study-- Prime Buildings 2013 $200 Used in the Study-- Support Buildings 2013 $50 (1) Source: Indian River County 2) Source: Indian River County Sheriff's Master Plan (3) Source: Indian River County, includes buildings for which information was available (4) Source: Indian River County, includes buildings for which information was available (5) Recent impact fee studies, represents weighted average of prime and support buildings Public Buildings Similar to law enforcement buildings, public buildings also tend to include a wide range of buildings, such as offices, courthouses, maintenance buildings, parking garages, etc. as well as prime versus support buildings. The most recent public buildings constructed in Indian River County were completed in 2007. Given the changes in construction costs since then, these cost figures were considered outdated and not used. The County has plans to add approximately 10,000 square feet of courtroom space over the next five years, and the cost associated with this expansion is estimated at $200 per square foot. As presented in Table F-4, the insurance value of existing prime buildings averaged $210 per square foot and support buildings averaged $46 per square foot. Finally, the building value of prime and support facilities in other Florida jurisdictions for which information was available, range from $135 to $200 per square foot. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-5 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Given this information, the building value of prime facilities is estimated at $210 per square foot and support buildings at $50 per square foot. This results in a weighted average value of $167 per square foot for all buildings, which is within the range of other jurisdiction. It is also almost the same figure as that used in the 2005 study ($169 per square foot) and approximately 25 percent lower than the figure used in the 2007 study ($226 per square foot). Table F-4 Value of Public Buildings Source Year Future Planned Facilities(' N/A Building Cost per Square Foot $200 Insurance Values of Existing Buildings (prime)(2 2013 $210 Insurance Values of Existing Buildings (support)(3) 2013 $46 Recent Public Building Construction in Other Florida Counties(4) 2010-2012 $135 - $200 Used in the Study-- Prime Buildings 2013 $210 Used in the Study -- Support Buildings 2013 I $50 (1) Source: Indian River County Capital Improvement Plan 2) Source: Indian River County, includes buildings for which information was available (3) Source: Indian River County, includes buildings for which information was available (4) Source: Recent impact fee studies, represents weighted average of prime and support buildings Libraries The most recent library construction in Indian River County was completed in 2009 for a building cost of $263 per square foot. The current average insurance value of existing libraries is $206 per square foot, which tends to represent a conservative estimate. Finally, recent library construction in other Florida jurisdictions provided an average building cost of $245 per square foot. Given this information, a building value of $240 per square foot is used in the library impact fee calculations. This figure is almost same as that used in the 2005 study ($242 per square foot) and represents a decrease of approximately 20 percent from the 2007 study ($296 per square foot). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-6 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-5 Library Building Value Source Construction of Brackett Library'} Insurance Values of Existing Libraries(2) Recent Library Construction in Other Florida Counties(3) Used in the Study Year 2009 2013 2010-2012 2013 Building Cost per Square Foot $263 $206 $245 $240 1) Source: Indian River County (2) Source: Indian River County (3) Source: Recent impact fee studies Parks & Recreation Facilities The parks and recreation facilities impact fee inventory includes several recreational facilities. The value of these facilities is based on insurance values, information from other jurisdictions and discussions with the County staff. Solid Waste Facilities The solid waste impact fee inventory includes several customer care centers. Due to the limited information on these facilities, the value is based on the recent reconstruction and expansion of Oslo Convenience Center at a cost of $2.6 million. Land Values For each impact fee program area, land values were determined based on the following analysis, as data available: • Recent land purchases for the related infrastructure (if any); • Value of current parcels as reported by the Indian River County Property Appraiser; • Value of vacant land by size and by land use; and • Vacant land sales over the past three years by size and by land use. It should be noted that the land value and sales analysis suggested that sales data indicates higher values than estimates included in the Property Appraiser's database for those vacant properties that have not been sold for a while. This may be due to a lag in the update of land values. The following paragraphs summarize the data used for each program area. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-7 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Correctional Facilities The land value estimate for correctional facilities was provided by the County during the 2005 study ($35,000 per acre) and was based on the sale of vacant land for 4- to 6 -acre parcels in West Indian River County (IRC) during the 2007 study ($184,000 per acre). West IRC is defined as the area between 58th Avenue and County Road 512 and represents the area where the County is likely to build future facilities. To provide an apples -to -apples comparison to the 2007 study, vacant land sales for parcels with 4 to 6 acres in West IRC was conducted and supplemented with additional analysis, which is summarized in Table F- 6. The County has not purchased any land for correctional facilities since 2005 and the recent jail expansions were located on the existing Jail/Sheriff Complex. As presented in Table F-6, the value of parcels where the current facilities are located is approximately $46,000 per acre. To supplement this figure, TOA conducted an analysis of vacant land sales and values based on the data included in the Indian River County Property Appraiser database. Vacant land sales and values were evaluated by land use (residential vs. all land uses) and by size. As mentioned previously, this analysis suggested that sales data indicates higher values than estimates included in the Property Appraiser's database for those properties that have not been sold for a while. Because correctional facilities do not have to be located in centralized areas, it is thought to be appropriate to evaluate values of residential properties, which tend to be lower than those for commercial properties. In addition, values of all land uses are also provided. In terms of size, because the current facilities are located on parcels with 10 to 15 acres, values and sales of similar size parcels were evaluated. Given that the land of current facilities is valued at $46,000 per acre, sales of 4 to 6 -acre parcels suggested an average price of $51,000 per acre, and the remaining analysis provided a range of $13,000 per acre to $124,000 per acre for residential properties, an average land value of $50,000 per acre for correctional facilities is found to be a reasonable estimate. This figure represents an increase of approximately 40 percent from the 2005 study and a decrease of 70 percent from the 2007 study. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-8 Impact Fee Update Study ?S'7 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-6 Land Value Analysis - Correctional Facilities Variablei1 Value of Current Parcels Year 2013 Average Land Value per Acre $45,600 Value of Vacant Land: West IRC- Residential - 4 t 6 acres 2013 $12,855 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $18,105 - 15 to 20 acres 2013 $21,353 West IRC- All Land Uses -4to6acres 2013 $15,727 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $24,376 - 15 to 20 acres 2013 $22,622 Countywide - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $21,884 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $24,620 - 15 to 20 acres 2013 $26,160 Countywide - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $26,741 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $32,543 - 15 to 20 acres 2013 $31,644 Vacant Land Sales: West IRC- Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $43,238 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $59,271 - 15 to 20 acres 2010-2012 $95,109 West IRC - All Land Uses -4to6acres 2010-2012 $51,252 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $56,403 - 15 to 20 acres 2010-2012 $97,836 Countywide - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $42,109 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $61,063 - 15 to 20 acres 2010-2012 $124,315 Countywide - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $49,868 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $63,042 - 15 to 20 acres 2010-2012 $130,357 Used in the Study 2013 $50,000 (11 Source: Indian River County Prooertv Aooraiser Database Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 F-9 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Law Enforcement The most recent land purchase for law enforcement facilities was made in 2011, for a price of $355,000 per acre. However, because the parcel included structures, this price is considered to be higher than what the County is likely to pay in the future for vacant land. Discussions with the County and Sheriff's Office suggested that future expansions outlined in the Master Plan are likely to be located on the existing Jail/Sheriff's Complex and the recently purchased land. The current value of existing parcels is approximately $50,000 per acre based on information obtained from the Indian River County Property Appraiser. Given this and the range of related vacant land values and sales is of $13,000 per acre to $66,000 per acre, an estimate of $50,000 per acre is used for land value in the calculation of law enforcement impact fee. This figure represents an increase of approximately 40 percent from the 2005 study ($35,000 per acre) and a decrease of 70 percent from the 2007 study ($184,000 per acre). Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-10 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-7 Lana value Analysis - Law Variable1�1 Value of Current Parcels tntorcement Year 2013 faculties Average Land Value per Acre $50,702 Cost of Recent Land Purchases)�) 2011 $355,104 Value of Vacant Land: West IRC- Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $12,855 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $18,105 West IRC - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $15,727 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $24,376 Unincorporated - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $18,754 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $20,824 Unincorporated - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $23,844 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $29,338 Vacant Land Sales: West IRC- Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $43,238 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $59,271 West !RC - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $51,252 - 6 t 15 acres 2010-2012 $56,403 Unincorporated - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $42,614 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $62,617 Unincorporated - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $50,480 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $66,238 Used in the Study 2013 $50,000 (1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database (2) Source: Indian River County Sheriff's Office, the parcel included structures Emergency Services Typically, fire stations need to be located at or near major intersections and not in residential areas, for better access and minimum disturbance. As such, land value of these facilities tends to be higher. This can be seen in the current land value of existing fire stations at $102,000 per acre with a range of $16,000 per acre to $171,000 per acre. The Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County F-11 Impact Fee Update Study 2lto Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study County purchased land for Station 13 in 2010 at a cost of $121,000 per acre. This information along with relevant vacant land value and sales information are summarized in Table F-8. Table F-8 Variable(1) Value of Current Parcels Year 2013 Average Land Value per Acre $101,802 Cost of Recent Land Purchases(�) 2010 $120,517 Value of Vacant Land: West IRC - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $12,855 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $18,105 West IRC - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $15,727 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $24,376 Countywide - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $21,884 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $24,620 Countywide - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $26,741 - 6 to 15 acres 2013 $32,543 Vacant Land Sales: West IRC- Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $43,238 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $59,271 West IRC - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $51,252 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $56,403 Countywide - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $42,109 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $61,063 Countywide - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $49,868 - 6 to 15 acres 2010-2012 $63,042 Used in the Study 2013 $60,000 (1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database (2) Source: Indian River County; Represents land purchase for Station 13, made in 2010. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County F-12 Impact Fee Update Study 1r Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Given this information, the high end of vacant land sales ($60,000 per acre) is used for the value of land for emergency services impact fee calculations. This figure is lower than the value of land where existing stations are located and represents a 30 -percent decrease from the 2005 study and a 60 -percent decrease from the 2007 study. Public Buildings Public buildings include a range of facilities from County offices and courthouses that need to be in central locations to maintenance facilities that have more flexibility in location. Given that the County has not bought any land for public buildings recently and programmed capital expansions will take place on existing land, the land value of parcels where the existing buildings are located is evaluated, which averaged $89,615. This value is used in the impact fee calculations, and represents a decrease of 12 percent from the 2005 study and 50 percent decrease from the 2007 study. Libraries As presented in Table F-9, the current value of land where existing libraries are located averages $38,000, with a range of $15,000 per acre to $330,000 per acre. This information along with the vacant sales values of 4 to 6 -acre parcels suggests that an average land value of $50,000 per acre is a reasonable estimate. This figure is 50 percent lower than that used in the 2005 study and 75 percent lower than the 2007 study. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-13 Impact Fee Update Study ZL2- Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-9 Land Value Analysis - Libraries Variable(�) Value of Current Parcels Year 2013 Average Land Value per Acre $38,929 Value of Vacant Land: West IRC - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $12,855 West IRC - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $15,727 Countywide - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $21,884 Countywide - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2013 $26,741 Vacant Land Sales: West IRC- Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $43,238 West IRC - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $51,252 Countywide - Residential - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $42,109 Countywide - All Land Uses - 4 to 6 acres 2010-2012 $49,868 Used in the Study 2013 $50,000 (1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database Parks Indian River County's parks inventory includes parcels ranging from 0.3 acres to 140 acres. As such, a more detailed land value analysis was conducted, as shown in Table F-10. The value of current inventory averages $31,000 per acre. Given that the land values and sales for different acreage groupings range from $17,000 per acre to $100,000 per acre, an average value of $50,000 per acre is found to be a reasonable estimate for impact fee calculation purposes. This represents a 45 percent increase from the 2005 study and a 10 percent decrease from the 2007 study. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-14 Impact Fee Update Study 1 43 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table F-10 Land Value Analysis - Parks Acreage 0.5 to 4 acres 2013 PA Just Values per Acre (Residential)(1) West IRC Unincorporated $29,474 $94,797 4 to 6 acres $12,855 $18,754 6 to 15 acres $18,105 $20,824 15 to 25 acres $21,353 $22,985 20 to 60 acres $18,612 $17,334 40 to 130 acres $19,851 $18,754 Acreage 0.5 to 4 acres 2013 Sales per Acre West IRC $100,046 (Residential)(1) Unincorporated $147,086 4 to 6 acres $43,238 $42,614 6 to 15 acres $59,271 $62,617 15 to 25 acres $95,109 $84,919 20 to 60 acres $74, 877 $64,131 40 to 130 acres $47,197 $41,018 Used in the Study $50,000 (1) Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser Database Solid Waste The inventory of solid waste facilities includes only the customer convenience centers used by residential land uses. These facilities are typically built on previous landfills. Given the unique nature of these facilities, the current value of parcels where existing centers are located is used in the study, which averaged $20,000 per acre. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 F-15 Impact Fee Update Study 2G4 Appendix G Educational Facilities Impact Fee: Supplemental Information Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study This appendix presents the inventory of traditional schools in Indian River County as well as an explanation of building and land value estimates used in the impact fee calculations. School District Inventory The current inventory of traditional schools in Indian River County is presented in Table G-1. Table G-1 Indian River County School District Existing School Inventory Number Permanent Permanent FISH Schools Grade Student Capacity (after Permanent Stations FISH capacity Net Square Elementary Schools 1 Beachland Elementary K-5 543 543 94,544 2 Citrus Elementary K-5 556 556 74,775 3 Dodgertown Elementary PK -5 560 560 117,305 4 Fellsmere Elementary PK -5 546 546 77,406 5 Glendale Elementary K-5 612 612 71,769 6 Highlands Elementary K-5 619 619 65,867 7 Liberty Magnet K-5 666 666 105,793 8 Osceola Magnet (NEW) K-5 557 557 78,217 9 Pelican Island Elementary K-5 573 573 65,988 10 Rosewood Elementary K-5 543 543 84,042 11 Sebastian Elementary K-5 637 637 85,825 12 Treasure Coast Elementary PK -5 553 553 94,719 13 Vero Beach Elementary PK -5 796 796 106,460 Subtotal - Elementary Schools 7,761 7,761 1,122,710 Middle Schools 1 Gifford Middle School 6-8 1,136 1,022 135,033 2 Oslo Middle School 6-8 1,140 1,026 152,045 3 Sebastian River Middle School 6-8 1,107 996 147,706 4 Storm Grove Middle School 6-8 1,382 1,244 167,794 Subtotal -Middle Schools 4,765 4,288 602,578 High Schools 1 Sebastian River High School 9-12 2,440 2,318 344,334 2 Vero Beach High School (Main Campus) 9-12 2,200 2,090 352,408 Vero Beach High School (Freshman Learning Center) 9-12 870 827 129,987 Subtotal - High Schools 5,510 5,235 826,729 Grand Total - All Schools 18,036 17,284 2,552,017 Source: Indian River School District Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 Indian River County G-1 Impact Fee Update Study 2(.4 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Building Cost Analysis To determine the architectural, civil design, site improvement, construction, and FF&E costs associated with building a new school in Indian River County, the following information was evaluated: • Recently built schools in Indian River County; • Cost estimates included in the Educational Plant Survey; • Insurance values of the existing schools; • Cost related information provided by the Indian River County School District; and • School cost information for 135 schools in other Florida counties. The following paragraphs provide further detail on this research and analysis. Construction Cost The last schools built in Indian River County included the replacement of Vero Beach Elementary School in 2012 and the construction of a new middle school (Storm Grove Middle School) in 2009. The cost associated with these schools ranged from $156 per net square foot for the elementary school to $241 per net square foot for the middle school, as shown in Table G-2. In addition, the District's Educational Plant Survey includes several school expansion projects. The estimated cost associated with these expansions ranges from $228 per net square foot to $343 per net square foot. Discussions with the School District confirmed that there were certain elements unique to the Storm Grove Middle School, which resulted in higher cost and the additions tend to be more expensive than new school construction. Finally, the insurance values of existing school buildings range from approximately $145 per net square foot for elementary schools to $185 per net square foot for high schools, with an average of $165 per net square foot for all traditional schools. These figures are consistent with the construction costs observed in other jurisdictions. Table G-3 summarizes data obtained from the Florida Department of Education for schools built in 2011. As shown, the average construction cost is approximately $175 per net square foot, with a range of $145 per net square foot for elementary schools to $200 per net square foot for high schools. Given this data and information, average construction costs of $145 per net square foot for elementary schools, $175 per net square foot for middle schools, and $185 per net square Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 G-2 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table I-1 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Full Calculated Fee; Unincorporated County Parks & Recreation RE LOC Land Use Unit 2009 Portent Full CalculatedChange Adopted Rate RESIDENTIAL. Transportation 1009 Percent Adopted Rate Full Calwtatetl Change Educational Facilities' 1009FullCalbted PISCent Adopted Rate wChange Administrative Fee 12.5%) 2009 Peccant Adopted Rate Full Calwlated Change Total (All Fees) 2009 00,10, Adopted Rate Full Cakvlxted Change 210 Single Family (detached) - less than 1,000 11 du 51,302 51,696 30338 52,974 53,149 5.9% 51,756 56,077 246.138 5103 5330 80.3% 57,519 513,544 80.1% - 1,000 to 1,499 sf du 51,302 51,830 45.6% $2,974 53,554 19.5% $1,756 56,077 246.1% 0183 5348 90.238 57,519 514,276 89.9% - 1,50030 2,499 sf du 51,463 51,947 33.1% 54,483 54,240 -5.238 31,756 56,077 246.1% $229 5372 62.4% 59,388 315,266 62.6% - 2,500 sl or larger du 51,587 $2,164 36.438 55,031 55,004 -0538 51,756 56,077 246.1% 3249 5404 62.2% 510,195 316,572 62.6% 220 Mul33-F2mily/401essor9 Unit du 5884 51,111 25.7% 52,428 52,742 12.938 3500 52,387 377.4% 5117 5193 65.0% 54,816 97,923 64.5% 240 Mobile Home/RV (tied down) du 5942 51,086 15.3% 51,745 51,550 -11.2% 5623 53,665 488.3% 5109 5198 81.7% $4,455 58,132 82.5% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel (20111 n/a No n/a 52,804 52156 -23.1% n/4 0/4 Na 586 572 -163% $3,539 52,970 -16.1% 320 Motel30021 n/a Na n/a 51,516 51,524 0.5% n/4 Na Na 554 055 1.9% 52,219 52,264 2.0% 620 Horne Nursing Hoe bed n/a n/a n/a $432 0494 140% Na Na Na 530 539 300% $1,237 31,583 28013 252 Assisted Cam Living Facility(ACLF3 bed Na Na Na 5620 0555 -10.5% n/a Na Na 536 340 11.1% 51,460 51,645 12.7% OFFICE & FINANCIAL. 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sl or less 1,00001 Na n/a Na $13,411 59,602 -28.4% Na Na Na 5389 5273 -299% $15,940 511,175 -29.9% Medical Office/CRnlc greater than 10,00021 1,00013 n/a n/a n/a 513,411 $13,996 4.4% Na n/e n/a 0389 0397 2.1% 515,940 516,288 2.2% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,00031 n/a Na Na 510,634 510,511 .1.2% Na Na Na 5326 5326 00% 013,384 513,383 00% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,00081 n/a n/a n/a $13,020 513,820 6.1% Na n/a n/a 5376 $411 93% 515,404 516,835 9.3% 710 General Office 1,00011 n/a n/a n/a 53,798 54,257 12.1% Na Na n/a 0139 5135 -2.9% 55,696 59,533 -2.9% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a $2,798 53,164 13.1% Na n/a n/a 594 5103 9.6% 53,866 04,237 9.6% INDUSTRIAL. 140 Manula twine 1,00011 n/a n/a n/a 51,318 51,473 11.8% Na n/a n/a 054 551 -5.6% 52,203 52,095 -4.9% 150 Warehousing 1,00011 n/a n/1 n/a 51,228 $1,372 11.7% Na n/a n/a $43 $42 -13% 51,775 51,733 -2.4% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,00023 n/a Na n/a 5862 $483 -44.0% n/4 Na n/a 524 $14 -01.7% 5978 5565 -42.2% 152 Hi gh-Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,00013 n/a n/a n/a 51,228 5655 -06.7% Na Na Ne 543 020 -535% 51,775 3834 -53013 110 General 0ght Industrial 1,00011 Na n/a n/a 52,400 52,681 13.5% Na n/a n/a 586 587 1.2% $3,538 53,556 0.5% n/a Concrete Plant acre n/a n/a n/a 55,382 56,006 11.6% Na Na Na 0185 5194 4.9% 57,572 $7,970 53% Na Sand Mining 0130 n/4 Na 2a 5690 5769 11.438 Na Na Ne 528 525 -10.7% $1,161 01,022 -12.0% RETAIL. 820 Retail 1,00011814 n/a Na n/a 53,163 $6,360 101.1% Na Na Ns 5155 5227 46.5% $6,341 59,293 469% 944/906 Gasoline/Service Stat onwith or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. n/a Na n/a 55,587 55,082 -90% n/4 No Na 5183 $182 -0.5% 57,486 57,445 -05% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,0001( n/a Na n/a 510,108 58,294 -17.9% Na Na n/4 5297 5249 -16.2% 512,184 $10,222 -16.1% 932 Restaurant 1,0001( 0/a n/a n/a 522,152 520,643 -6.8% Na n/a Na $741 5710 -0.2% 530,364 529,094 -4.2% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Drive-Thru 1,000sl n/a n/a n/a 534,781 545,464 30.7% Na Na Na 51,070 51,391 30.054 543,877 557,017 29.9% 850 Supermarket 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 511,179 59,035 -19.2% n/a n/a Na 5300 5284 -16.5% 513,922 911,660 -16.2% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,00011 n/a n/a n/a 57,830 56,519 -16.7% Na Na n/a 5207 5206 -03% 58,082 58,437 -05% 947 Sell -Service Car Wash service bay n/a n/a n/a 514,589 54,909 -66.4% n/a n/a n/a 5413 $108 -4.2% 516,917 56050 -64.2% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 et n/a n/a n/a 525,430 523,252 -8.6% Na n/a Na 5750 5748 .0.3% 530,736 530,657 -03% 890 Furniture Store 1,0003) n/a n/a n/e 51,373 51,367 -0.4% N2 N8 Na 548 541 -14.6% 51,967 51,670 -15.1% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole n/a Na n/a 511,248 517,515 55.7% Na n/a Na 5342 5469 37.1% 514,007 319,216 37.2% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,00003 n/a n/a n/a 510,824 512,967 19.8% n/a Na Na $331 5412 245% 513,585 $16,906 24.0% 412 County Park aCre n/a n/a n/a 5718 5859 19.6% n/a 11/2 n/a 524 527 12.5% 5975 51,114 14.3 491 Tennis Court Murt n/a Na n/a 512,180 515,236 25.1% n/a Na N2 5361 5471 30.5% $14,818 $19,315 303% 420 Marina boat bath n/a n/a n/a 5973 51,454 49.4% n/a Na Na 529 542 44.8% 51,197 51,712 43.0% GOVERNMENTAL 732 Post Office 1 000 sf n/a n/a Na 514,199 515,858 11.7% Na Na Na 5404 5403 9.7% $16,583 518,151 9.5% 590 Library 1,00011 n/a n/a n/a 517,925 526,027 45.2% n/11 n/a Na 5492 5701 42.5% 520185 528,737 42.4% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 s) n/a n/a n/a 59,632 510,765 11.7% n/a n/4 Na 5258 $292 13.2% 510,579 511,972 13.2% 571 1.11 bed n/a Na n/e 5309 52,109 442.2% n/a Na Na 529 580 175.9% 51,187 $3,269 175.4% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1000 s1 n/a n/a n/a 58,847 57,960 -100% n/a Na Na 5257 5224 -12.8% 510,537 59,200 .12.7% 610 Hospital 100010 n/a Na Na 55,309 55,551 4.6% Na Na Na 5173 5178 2.9% 57,090 57,293 2.9% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,00021 Na Na Na $3,511 515,471 300.6% n/a Na Na 5139 $459 230.2% 55,707 518,829 229.9% 560 Church 1,000 sf n/a n/4 N. 52,588 52,564 -0.9% Na n/4 Na 579 079 00% $3,219 $3,226 0.2% 444 Moyle Theaterw/Matinee 1302211 n/a n/a n/a $22,743 515,768 -30.7% Na Na Na 5780 5565 -27.6% 531,966 523,161 .27.5% 520 Elementary School (Private, 8-54 student n/8 n/a n/a 5149 $364 1443% n/a Na Na 57 $11 57.1% 5279 5443 58.8% 522 Middle School (Private, 6.5) student n/a Na Na 3149 5501 236.2% Na Na Na 57 515 1143% 5279 $596 113.6% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student n/a n/a n/a 5538 5527 -20% Na Na Na 517 515 -11.8% 5710 5633 .109% 540/550 UnlversINlunlor College (7,50003 fewer students) student No Na Na 5653 5985 50.8% Na Na 8/1 520 527 350% 5809 01,126 39.2% Na Fire Station 1,00001 n/a Na n/a 5983 5721 -26.7% Na Na Na 540 533 -175% 51,622 51,346 -170% 'For Educate al Facilites Impact Fee, the Single Family (detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Famil Attached/Townhouse' resident I land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. lune 2014 1-2 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 1-2 Master Fee Schedule - Full Calculated Fee; City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, City of Sebastian, City of Vero Beach Correttbnal 8801171,1 ITE IOC land Use Unit 7009 full? Iola etl Percent Adopted Rate Change Solid Waste Facilities 2009 Full Cakutated Percent Adopted Rate Change • Public Buildings 1 2009 Iu11C41Wlated Percent Adopted Rate Change libraries 2009 Fu 1l Caku1 ,„ Percent Adopted Rata Change Emergency Services l 2009 Full CaIWlated Pe«vnt Adopted Rale Change Transp0501on 2009 Fu1ICa1101ted Percent Adapted Rate Change 210 Single 8a mlly (00880(ed) - less than 1,000 11 du 5101 5251 663% 575 5127 593% 5183 5648 254.1% 5430 5611 42.1% 5247 5274 10.9% $2,974 53,149 5.9% - 1,000 to 1,499 s1 du 5151 5270 788% 575 5137 82.7% 5183 $696 2803% $030 5657 578% _5247 $296 19.8% 52,974 53,554 19.5% -1,500 to 2,099 s1 du 5170 5287 688% 575 5146 94.718 5206 5739 258.7% 5483 5700 44.9% 5278 5314 12.9% 54,483 $4,248 -5.2% - 2,500 sf or larger du 5184 5320 73.9% 575 5163 117.3% I 5223 $826 270.0% i 5524 5781 090% 5301 5348 15.6% 05,031 55,000 43% 220 1AVIO-Fam3ly/000108079 Unit du 5100 5162 620% 557 $83 45.6% 5121 5418 2453% 5285 5397 39.3% 5176 5181 28% 52,418 52,742 12.9% 240 Mobile Home/RV(tied down) du 5123 5183 488% 575 593 24.07. 5149 5470 215A% 3349 5046 278% 5182 5197 82% 51,745 51,550 -113% `yN IRANRENT, ASSISTED, GROUP:' -- - -• -. •. •- .•_ - r - ._ _ _ .- a . ... , 310 Hotel room 599 5121 222% 521 50 -100.0% 1 5229 5312 362% Na Na Na 5160 5131 -18.1% 52,804 52,156 .23.1% 320 640701 r 599 5111 13.1% . 511 50 .1900% 5229 5288 258% Na Na Na 5160 5121 -24.4% 51 516 $1,520 03% 620 Nursing Hoe bed 5107 5171 598% $33 50 -1000%; 5312 5442 41.7% Na Na N. 5172 0185 7.6% 5432 5494 24.4% 252 Assisted Care Uvin7 FacilityInal) bed 5107 5171 598% 562 $0 -100.0%- 5321 5442 41.7% Na Na Na 5172 5185 7.6% 5620 5555 .10.5% -- OFFICE &NNANCML: .. •- - - . .. <. _ _ _ - _ _ - _ . ._ _. 720 Medical 0Hic44inIc 10,000 sl oe less 1,000 s7 5186 5212 140 % $118 $0 00 40%. 51375 5547 -57.2% Na Na Na $299 5779 -232% 513,411 $9,602 -28.4% Medical Office/Clinic greater Nan 10,000 s1 1,00051 5186 $309 66.1%, 5118 50 -1004% 51,275 5797 -373% Na n/a Na $299 5334 11.714 513,412 $13,996 4.4% 911 Etank/SaVIngs 99a18.14 1,00011 5212 $025 958% 5218 $0 -100.018 51,454 51,071 -263% Na Na Na 5341 5449 31.7% 310,634 510,521 -1.2% 912 Bank/Savings 800e-10 1,000 81 5174 5025 144.3% 5118 $0 -10008 51,191 51,095 -8.1% Na Na Na 5280 5459 63.9% 513,020 513,820 6.1% 710 50000.107008 1000,7 7153 5186 21.6% 594 50 -100.0% 31,050 5480 -543% Na Ne Ne 5246 5201 .28.3% 53,798 54,157 17.1% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 s7 $81 5158 95.1% 594 50 -1000% 5555 5408 -263% n/a Na 0/8 5130 5171 313% 52,798 53,164 13.1% 140 Manufacturing 100011 055 $93 69.1% - 0236 $0 -1000% 5375 5240 -360% 0/3 Na n/4 588 5101 148% 51318 51,473 118% 150 Warehousing 1000 5( 542 552 238% - $47 50 -1000% - 5788 5134 -533% Ne n/4 Na $68 556 .17.6% 51,228 51,372 11.7% 151 Minl-Warehbusa 1,000 0 58 511 37.5% 519 50 .100.0% 540 529 .273% n/a Na n/a $13 512 .7.7% 5862 5483 34,0% 152 High-Cube(Aulonvted)WMehoule 100011 542 $26 -38.1% 547 $0 -100.0% $288 567 -76.7% 0/4 Na Na 568 $28 .588% $1,228 5655 46.7% 110 General Ught l 000s75a1 1000 s1 575 5129 730% 5236 50 -100.0% 5512 3331 .354% 0/a Na 0/a 5120 5139 258% 52,404 52,681 11.5% Na Concrete Plant acre 5165 5189 752% $213 SD -1000% - $1,130 5744 -343% Na Na Na' $265 - 5312 17.7% 55,382 56,085 11.6% Na Sand Mining acre 571 537 763% 5213 30 -1004% 5145 596 -338% n/, Na Na 534 540 178% $690 5769 110% .a RE7718:- .._ - _ .. .. 820 Retail 1,000 sfgla 5112 5441 41.3%, $236 50 -100.0%' 51,531 $1,138 .25.7% Na Na Na 5503 5477 -53% $3,163 56,360 101.1% 904/946 Gasoline/Service Nation with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 5188 5356 89.4% $39 50 -1004% 5921 5917 4A% Na Na Na' 5303 5385 27.1% 55,587 55,050 -90% 841 New/Used AUWSaIes 1,000 s1 5186 5274 47.1%' 5118 50 -1000%; 5911 5706 41.6% Ne Na N. $300 $296 -1.3% 510,108 58,794 -17.9% 932 Restaurant 100011 5800 51363 57.9% 5330 50 -1000% 53,923 53,255 .170% Ne 11/4 Na 51389 $1,365 ' 5.9% $22,152 520,643 .6.8% 934 Fast food Rest. w/Drive-mru 1,000 s1 5863 52,658 92.1% $330 50 -1000% 54327 50,273 1.1% Na Na Ma 51,389 51,791 29.018 534,782 $45,464 30.7% 850 30700 ,6,7 1,000 s1 5222 5382 72.1% 5474 50 -100.018 51,087 5984 43% n/. Na n/a 5357 0413 15.7% 511,179 59,035 .192% 942 Automobile Repair/840/ Shop 1,00011 570 5279 2988% 520 50 -1004%' 5134 5720 4373% 0/8 Ne n/a 5107 5302 1823% 57,830 $6,519 -16.7% 947 SNI.Service Car Wash smite bay 5206 5162 .21.4% 577 50 -100,018' 51,009 5418 -58.6% Ne N4 N. 5332 5175 37.3% 314,589 54,909 -66.4% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 s1 5463 51486 1348% $424 50 -1000% 52,270 52,799 233% Na Na Na 5746 51,174 57.4% 525,430 523,252 -8.6% 890 Furniture Score 1,000 51 535 543 22.9%. 5236 $0 -100418' 5170 5110 .353% Ne Na n/a $56 546 -27.9% 51,373 51,367 4.4% REOtE4710NAL: 430 Golf Course hole 5267 5201 -207% 538 50 -1000% 51,307 5518 40.4% Na Ne Ne 5429 5217 39.4% 511,248 517,515 55.7% 492 Racquet Oub/Health Club/Dane Studio 100011 5259 5575 1220% $118 50 4000% 51,270 51,483 168% n/a Na 0/a 5417 5622 492% 510,824 512,967 19.8% 412 County Park acre 517 537 1178% $85 50 -100.0% 581 596 183% Na n/4 Na 527 540 48.1% 3718 5859 196% 491 Tennis Court coun 0253 5589 1328% 518 $0 -100.0% 51,241 51,517 222% Na Na Na 5408 5636 55.9% 512,180 515336 25.1% 420 Marina haat berth $17 535 105.9% 545 50 -1000% 582 $91 11.0% Ne Ne n/a 527 538 40.7% 5973 51,454 49.4% GOVERNMENTAL: • - _ .. ..� .. 732 Post OH ice 1,000 s1 $194 5302 55.7%, 594 50 -1000% 51,107 5778 .29.7% n/4 Na M 5312 5326 43% 514,199 515,858 11.7% 590 Library 1,00011 5188 $328 743% $94 $0 -1000% 5919 5845 -8.1% 0/4 n/4 n/a 5302 5354 17.2% 517 925 526,027 45.2% 733 Government Office Complex 2,000 s1 5148 5259 750% 594 SO -1004% Na Na Na Na Na Na 5238 5280 176% 59,632 520,760 11.7% 571 tail bed 0/a Na n/a 516 50 •1000% $466 5667 43.1% Na Ne Na 5153 5175 10.4% 3389 52,109 441.2% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 010 Care Center 1,00051 5110 5166 50.9% - 5236 50 -100.018 I 5755 5427 33410 Na Na 0/4 5177 5179 1.1% 58,847 $7,960 -10.0% 610 Hospital 1,000 s1 5171 5255 49.1% 583 50 -1000% 5838 $658 -213% n/a n/4 Na 5275 0276 0.4% 55,309 55,551 46% 640 Veterinary Olnlc 1400 s1 5178 $473 165.7% 5118 $0 -1000% 51,123 31,219 -03% N. Ne n/a 5287 5511 78.0% 53,511 515,471 340.6% 560 Church 100011 568 595 638%' 533 50 -1000% 5285 5245 -14.0% 0/0 Na Na 594 5103 96% 52,588 52,564 .0.9% 444 Moyle Theater w/Matinre 5925 31,114 20.4% $188 $0 -100078 54,535 50,471 -36.7% Na Na Na 51,490 51,104 -193% 522,743 515,768 -30.7% 520 Elementary School (Private, 8-5) student 510 511 100%' $12 50 -1000% 570 $29 -58.6% n/. Na Na $17 512 -29.4% 5149 5364 1443% 522 Middle School (Private. 6-9) student 510 513 300% $12 $0 -1000% $70 $34 -51.4% Na Na n/8 517 514 .17.6% 5149 5501 2363% 530 High School (Private, 941) student 513 515 15.4% 513 $0 -1000% 590 $38 .578% Ne Na N. 021 516 -238% 3538 5527 .2010 540/550 Universlry/leerier College (7,500 Or fewer students) student 511 519 72.7% 513 50 .1000% 578 348 -38.5% n/a Na Na 518 520 11.1% 5653 5985 50.8% Ne Fire Station 1.000 s1 569 3117 69.6% 594 50 •1004% 5339 5302 •20.9% 0/. Na Na NO Na Na 5983 5721 .26.7% 'Foy Educad0 al Facilities Impact Fee. the Single Fanly(detached) rate should also be used l r'51048 Fang Attached/Tow house' redden 'al land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 1-3 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 1-2 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Full Calculated Fee; City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, City of Sebastian, City of Vero Beach Educational Fadlities. RE LUC Land Use Unit 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Full Calculated Change RESIDENTIAL. City Admin Fee (2.0%1 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Full GIWIatctl Change County Admin. Fee (1.0%) 2009 Perrnnt Adopted Rate Full CalWlated Change Total (All Fees) 2009 Perangocent Adopted Rate Full GkuWted Ch 210 Single Family (detached) - less than 1,00053 du 51,756 56,077 246.1% 5116 5223 92.2% 558 5111 91.4% 55,990 $11,471 91.5% -1,000 to 1,499 sf du $1,756 56,077 246.1% $116 $234 101.7% 558 5117 101.7% $5,990 512,038 101.096 -1,500 to 2,499 sf du 51,756 56,077 246.1% 5149 $250 67910 575 5125 66.7% 57,675 512,886 67.9% - 2,50013 or larger du 51,756 56,077 246.1% 0162 5270 66.7% 581 5135 66.7% 58,337 $13,924 67.0% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 5500 52,387 377.4% 573 5127 74.0% 537 564 73.0% 53,777 56,561 73.7% 240 Mobile Home/RV(tied down) du $623 53,665 488.3% 565 $132 103.1% 537 566 106.3% 53,343 56,802 103.5% TRANSIENT ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel Warn n/a Na Ne 566 554 -181% 533 527 -181% 53,412 52,801 -17.9% 320 Motel room n/a Na Na 541 541 0.0% $20 $20 0.0% 52,086 $2,106 1.0% 620 Nursing Home bed Na Na Na $21 $26 239% 511 513 18.2% 51,008 51,331 223% 252 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACt23 bed n/a n/a Ma 525 527 8.0% $13 $14 7.7% 51,311 51,394 6.3% OFFICE& FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000,10,10ss 1,000 s1 No Na Na $306 5212 -30.7% 5153 $106 -30.7% 515,748 510,908 -30.7% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 s 1,000 sf Na Na n/a 5306 $309 1.0% $153 5154 0.7% 515,748 $15,899 1.096 911 Bank/Savings Walk4n 1,000 sf Na No Na $255 5249 -2.4% 5128 5124 3.1% 513,142 $12,819 -25% 912 Bank/Savings DFive4n 1,000 ss Na Na Na 5296 3316 6.8% $148 5158 6.8% 515,227 516,273 6.9% 710 General Office 1,000 s1 Na Na Na 5107 5102 '4.7% 553 551 -3.8% $5,501 55,277 .4.1% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 s1 Na Na Na 573 578 69% 537 $39 5.4% 53,768 54,018 6.6% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf Na Na Ne 541 $38 -73% $21 $19 -9.5% 52,134 51,964 41.0% 150 Warehousing 1,000 sf Ma n/a Na 533 $32 -3.0% $17 516 -5.9% 51,723 $1,662 -3.5% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000 st Na Na Na $19 $11 412.1% 59 $5 -44.4% 5970 $553 -3.2% 152 High-Cube(Automated) Warehouse 1,000,! Na Ma Na 533 516 -51.5% 517 $8 -52.9% 51,723 5800 -53.6% 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 st Na Na n/a $67 566 -1.5% 533 533 0.096 53,447 53,379 -2.0% n/a Concrete Plant acre n/a Ne Na 5143 5147 2.8% 572 574 2.8% 57,370 17,572 2.7% n/a Sand Mining acre Na Na Na $22 519 -13.6% 511 59 -18.2% 51,136 5970 -14.6% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000 Ada Na Na Na $115 5168 46.1% 557 584 47.4% $5,917 58,668 463% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Gr Wash fuel pos. Na Na Na 5141 $135 '4.3% 570 $67 '4.3% 57,249 56,942 '4.2% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf Na No Na $232 5191 -17.7% $116 596 -17.2% 511,972 59,857 -17.7% 932 Restaurant 1,000 st Ne Na n/a 5570 $531 -6.8% 5285 5265 '7.0% 529,349 527,322 -6.9% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Drlve-Thru 1,000 53 Na Na n/a 5832 51,064 27.9% $416 5532 27.9% $42,838 554,783 27.9% 850 Supermarket 1,000 st Na Na Na $265 5216 -18.5% $133 5108 -18.8% 513 667 511,138 -18.5% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 s1 Na n/a n/a $163 5156 '4.3% $82 578 '4.9% 58,406 58,054 '4.2% 947 Self -Service Gr Wash1 ervice bay n/a n/a n/a $324 $113 '65.1% 5162 557 -649% 516,699 59,834 -65.1% 853 Convenience Markel with Gas Pumps 1,000 sf N4 Na n/a 5587 5566 -3.6% 3293 $283 -3.4% 530,213 529,160 -3.5% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 s1 n/a Na Na 537 531 -16.2% $19 516 -15.8% 51,926 51,613 -163% RECREADONAL: 430 Golf Course hole Na Na Na 5266 5369 38.7% 1133 5185 39.1% 513,688 519,005 38.8% 492 Racquet aub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf Na Na Ma 5250 5313 213% $129 $156 20.9% 513,275 516,116 21.4% 412 County Park acre Na n/a Na $19 $21 10.5% $9 $10 11.1% $956 51,063 11.296 491 Tennis Cour[ court Ma Na Na $282 5360 27.7% 5141 $180 27.7% $14 523 518,518 273% 420 Marina boat berth Na n/a Na 523 532 39.1% 511 516 45.5% 51,178 51,666 41.4% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000 sf Na n/a Ma 5318 $345 8.5% 5159 $173 89% 516,383 317,782 8.5% 590 Library 1,00011 Na n/a n/a 5389 5551 41.6% $194 5276 42.3% 520,011 $28,381 41.8% 733 Government Office Compino 1,000 sf Na Na Na 5202 $226 11.9% $101 5113 11.9% 510,415 011,638 11.7% 571 Jail bed Na n/a Na 520 559 195.0% $10 $30 200.0% 51,054 $3,040 188.4% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf Na n/a Na $203 0175 -13.8% 5101 587 -13.9% 510,429 58,994 -13.8% 610 Hospital 1,00011 Na n/a Na 5134 5135 0.7% 567 $67 0.0% 56,877 56,942 0.9% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 44 Na Na 5106 5353 233.0% $53 5177 234.0% 55,476 518,204 232.4% 560 Church 1,000 st Na n/a Na 561 $60 -1.6% 531 530 -3.2% $3,150 53,097 -1.7% 444 Movie Theaterw/Mats neo screen n/a n/a n/a $598 $419 -29.9% $299 5210 -29.8% 530,778 521,586 -29.9% 520 Elementary School (Private, 0-5) student Na n/a Na 55 58 60.0% 53 54 333% 5266 $428 60.9% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student Na n/a Na 55 511 120.0% 53 $6 100.0% 5266 5579 117.7% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student Na Na Na 514 512 -14.3% 57 56 -143% 5696 5614 -11.896 540/550 University/Junior College (7,100 or fewer students) student Na Na Na $15 $21 40.0% 58 511 37.5% 5796 81,104 38.7% n/a Fire Stadon 1,000 sf Na Na Na 530 523 -233% 515 511 -26.7% 51,530 83,174 -233% 'For Educational Facilities Impact Fee, the Single Family (detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Family Attached/Townhouse' residential land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 1-4 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study rrE LUC Land Use, Table 1-3 Master Fee Schedule - Full Calculated Fee; Town of Indian River Shores Correctional Facilities505.0 W2010800I61100 U" Ado:elate PCZng: 1 Ado:Mate Full Calculated 210 R6100000L Public Buildings Acio=ate 1,11"1""1" PC°117ngne Libraries Totnsportalion Educational Facilities. Full Calculated Ado:Z9Ro. Full Calculated .09 Full Calculated ge Adopted Pate Slagle Family (detached) - Less than 1,500,3 220 240 310 320 620 252 -1,000 to 1,499 51 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf - 2,500 sf or larger du du 053 du $151 5151 5170 5184 5251 5270 5287 5320 66.2% 78.8% 68.8% 73.914 575 575 579 575 5127 5137 5146 $163 69.3% 82.7% 94.7% 1173% _5183 5183 5_206 5223 5648 _$696 _5739 _5826 259.1% 2803% 258.7% 270.4% $430 $430 5483 5524 5611 5657 5700 5781 42.1% 528% 449* 49.0% 52,974 $2,974 54,483 55,031 53,149 93,554 54,248 55,004 5.9% 195*. .52% .0.5% 51,756 51,756 51,756 $1,756 $6,077 95,017 56.077 56,077 246.1% 246.1% 246.1% 246.1% Multi-Fandly/Accessory Unit Mobilo 00140/04 (1100 down) 9040000T.A555100, 1116040! Hotel Motel Nursing 09498 Assisted Care living Facility (ACLF) - 0034016 FINANCIAL: 720 911 912 710 760 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 13 or less Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 13 Etank/Savings Walk.ln Bank/Savings Drive -In 60910011 00l00 Research 2, Development Center - 11101.5101115: 140 150 151 152 110 n/a 820 004/506 841 932 934 850 942 947 853 890 Manufacturing Warehousing Mini-Wa rehouse High -Cube (Automa tall Warehouse General Light Industrial Concrete Plant 5010 0,10190 Retail Gasoline/Service Station .216 0, w/o Car Wash Ne0/01ed Auto Sales Re0t/11111Ill Fast Food Rest w/Orive.Thru Superr. flat Automobile Repalc/Body Shop Self -Service Car Wash Convenience Market with Gas Pumps Furniture Store - RE09E4070NA06 430 492 412 491 420 732 590 733 571 565 610 640 560 444 520 522 530 540/550 I/o Golf Course Racquet Club/Health a ub/Dance Studio County Park Tennls Court Marina du du bed bed 205013 1,00009 1,05019 9100 5123 $99 599 5107 5107 1000 st 1,00013 5:000.9 5:00013 1,000 11 1,00003 1,000 s1 100019 iere Bete 5186 5186 5212 5174 5153 581 955 542 5162 5183 5121 5112 5171 5171 5212 $309 62016 482% 22.2% 13.1% 59.8% 59.8% 14.0% 661% 557 575 521 521 533 562 5118 $118 583 $93 50 50 So 50 30 5D 45.616 24.0% .100.0% -1020% -100.0% .1000* -100.0% .100.0% 5021 5249 5229 5229 5312 5312 51,775 51,275 $418 5470 _5312 5_288 5442 5442 6547 9797 2453% 215.4% 36.2% 25.8% 41.7% 41.7% -57.1% -37.5% 5285 5349 Na 0/2 0/0 n/66 n/a 5397 9446 n/o I/o n/a I/o nla 39.3% 27.8% I/o n/a 0/2 n/a n/a Na 52,428 51,745 52,804 51,516 5432 9620 513.411 51.3,411 52,742 51,550 $2,156 $1,524 5494 5555 59,602 513,996 12.914 -112% -23.1% 05% 14.4% -10.5% -28.416 44* 9500 $623 n/a n/a I/O n/0 52,3137 $3,665 N o N o 4/4 377.4% 4883% n/a No No ▪ No Na Na Oa n/a n/a 5415 5425 5186 5158 593 $52 95.8% 1443% 21.6% 95.1% 69.1% 23.8% 5118 5118 594 594 3236 547 so 50 50 50 50 So -100.0% -100.0% 62062.os .100.0% 6100.0% -100.0% 51,454 $1,191 51,050 9555 5375 9288 51,071 5_1,095 5480 5408 $240 5134 -263% -83% -543% -263% -36.016 -53.5% N. I/o I/o n/a Na n/a I/O n/a n/a I/o I/O I/O n/a No Na No $10,634 913,020 53,798 52,798 51,318 51,228 510,511 513,820 94,257 $3,264 51,473 51,372 .1.2% 6.1% 12.1% 13.1% 11.7% I/O I/o n/a I/O n/2 I/O 4/4 No No No I/o No nla 1,000 stela fuel pos. 1,400.0 3,000.3 1,00013 1,00013 1,00009 service bay 1.000 sf 1.00011 hole 1,000 sf /Mr! [01111 5000 5045 58 $02 575 5165 521 5312 $188 5186 5800 5863 5722 570 5206 5463 935 5267 $259 517 5253 517 511 526 5129 5289 537 ..mmuniman.me.i. 5441 5356 5274 91,263 52,658 5382 5279 5162 51,086 543 5201 5575 537 5589 $35 373% -38.1% 72.0% 752% 761% 413% 89.4% 473% 17.9% 92.1% 72.1% 298.6% -21.4% 134.6% 22.9% -24.7% 1222% 117.6% 13223% 105.9% GOVERNMENTAL: ,-4/ 301100100 Library Government Office Cowles 1211 MISCELLANEOUS: Day Care Center Hospital Veterinary Clink Church Moyle Theater w/Matinee Elementary School (Private, 6-5) Middle School (Private, 6-9) High School (Private, 942) GniuerSigillunior College (7,500 or feaer students) 0110 50001 1,00011 1,00011 5:00013 bed 1,00001 1.50043 1,00003 1,000,3 SCreen student student student student 105013 5194 5188 5148 n/a 5302 5328 5259 Na 55.7% 74.5% 75.0% n/a 9110 5166 50.9% 5171 $255 49,1% 9178 5473 165.7% 558 9925 510 510 513 511 595 632% 51,114 20.4% $11 10.0% 513 30.016 $15 150% 519 72,7% 569 5117 69.6% 519 547 5236 5213 5 213 5236 539 5008 $330 9330 5424 520 577 5424 5236 938, 5118 585 518 545 594 594 594 516 5236 583 5118 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 SO 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 so $0 -100.0% .100.0% 61000% .1020% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% .100.016 61000% .100.0% -1000% -0000* .0500* -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% 4000% 400.0% -100.0% 4000% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% -100.0% 50 -100.0% 50 .1000% 50 6100.0% $33 50 .1000* 5188 50 -100.0% 'For Educational Facillga Impact Fee, the SI ngle Family (detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Family Attached/Townhouse. residential land use. 512 50 -100.0% $12 50 .100.0% 513 50 -100.0% 513 30 4000% 594 50 -1000% 540 5288 5512 91,130 5145 51,531 5921 5912 53,923 54,227 51,087 5134 51,009 $2,270 $170 51,307 51,270 581 51,241 582 529 567 5331 _5744 590 51,138 5917 5706 $3,255 54,273 5984 5720 5418 52,799 Sno 5518 51,483 596 51,512. 991 -27.5% -76.7% -35.4% -342% -332% -25.7% -0.4% -22.6% -17.016 1.1% -93% 4373% -58.6% 233% -353% -60.9% 16.8% 183% 22.2% 11.096 ••••••rnftme.......1a..01-44,141.414.114 51,107 9919 No 5466 0778 _$845 N. 5667 5755 5427 5838 _5658 51,223 51,219 5285 _5245 54,535 $2,871 570 529 $70 534 590 538 $78 548 5339 0302 -29.7% -8.1% njo 43.1% -43.4% -213% -03% 44.016 -36.7% -58.6% -51.4% -57.8% -325% -10.996 No n/o Na n/a No 0/3 No I/o I/O n/a I/o Na 0/4 I/O n/ti I/o I/O I/o I/O No n/a I/o I/o nla No Na No No I/O I/o I/o I/O I/O I/o n/a Na 0/3 I/o I/o n/a I/o n/a I/o n/a I/O N66 n/0 I/o n/a No Na n/a No n/a Na n/a n/a n/a Na n/2 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0/2 n/a n/a n/a n/a Na n/a n/a nja 4/4 0/1 n/a n/a n/a n/66 n/a I/o Na Na 5862 91,228 52,404 55,382 $690 53,163 55,587 510,108 522,152 534,781 511,179 97,830 514,589 525,430 90,278 511,248 510,824 5718 512,180 9973 514,199 $17,925 59,632 9389 58,847 95,309 53,520 $2,588 522,743 5149 9149 5538 $653 5983 5483 5655 92.681 56,006 5769 56,360 55,082 58,294 920,643 545,464 59,035 56,519 $4,909, 523,252 51,367 517,515 512,967 5859 515,236 51,454 515,858 526,027 510,760 52,109 57,960 55,551 515,471 92,564 515,768 5364 5500 5527 5985 5721 -44.016 .46.7% 11.5% 11.4% 101.1% -9016 .17.914 -62%, 30.7% 6192% .16.7% 46.4% 43.6% -OA% 55.7% 19916 196* 25.1% 494* 452% 11.7% 442.2% •10011 4.616 340.6% -30.7% 144.3% 2362% -20% 50.8% -26.7% n/2 nla n/a 0/2 •••••10••114.. No n/a n/a n/a Na n/a n/a n/a nja Na n/o n/a n/a I/o I/o I/o n/2 I/o n/a nla n/2 I/O 0/2 n/a I/o I/O I/o n/a n/a I/O Na No n/a n/a No n/a I/o • No Na 4/4 I/O I/o I/O N o No I/O No O /0 I/o ./0 n/a n/a n/a No Na n/a Na n/a I/o nja I/o I/o No. I/O n/a I/O nla I/o Na I/o n/a NO n/a I/o n/a n/o n/a No n/a No Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 1-5 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 1-3 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Full Calculated Fee; Town of Indian River Shores City Admin Fee (20%) 00 TUC land Use Unit 2009 Full Calculated Percent Adopted Rate Change RESIDENTIAL. County Admin. Fee I1.0%) 2009 Full Calculated Percent Adopted Rate Change Total (ATI Fees) 2009 Full Calculated Percent Adopted Rale Change 210 Single Family (detached) - less than 1,000 s) du 5111 5217 95.5% $56 5109 94.6% $5,736 511,189 95.1% - 1,000 to 1,499 6) du $111 $228 105.4% 356 5114 103.6% 55,736 511,733 104.6% • 1500 to 2,499 sf du 5143 3244 70.6% $72 5122 69.4% $7,388 312,563 70.0% - 2,500 sf or larger du $156 $263 68.6% 578 5132 69.2% 58,027 513,566 69.0% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du $70 5124 77.1% $35 $62 77.1% $3,596 56,375 77.3% 240 Mobile Home/RV (tied down) du 561 5128 109.8% $31 $64 1065% 53,156 56,599 109.1% TRANSIENT,, ASSISTED, GROW: 310 Hotel room $63 352 -175% $32 $26 -16.820 33,248 52,667 -17.9% 320 Motelroom 337 338 2.720 519 319 0:020 51,921 51,981 3.120 620 Nursing Home bed 518 322 22220 59 511 22.2% 5911 51,140 25.1% 252 446)80ed Care Living Facility (ACLF) bed 522 $23 45% 511 $12 9.1% 31,134 51,203 6.1% OFFICE IL FINANCIAL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 s1 5300 5207 •310% 5150 3104 -30.7% 515,440 310,672 -30.9% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 s1 5300 $302 0.7% 5150 3151 0.7% 515,440 515,565 0.7% 911 Rank/Savings Walk -In 1,000,) 5248 3240 -32% $124 $120 -32% 512,790 $12,357 -3.4% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 s1 $290 5307 5.9% 1145 3153 5.5% $14,938 515,800 5.8% 710 General O8ice 1,000 s1 $102 598 -3.9% 551 $49 -3.9% 35,248 55,070 .3.4% 760 Research 8. Development Center 1,000 sf 571 575 5.6% $35 337 5.7% 33,634 53,842 57% INDUSTRIAL. 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sf 540 536 -100% 320 516 -10.096 32,044 31,860 AA% 150 Warehousing 1,000 sf 532 $31 -3.1% 516 $16 0.0% 31,653 31,605 -2.9% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000 sf $19 510 -4713% 59 55 .44.4% 5957 5538 -43.8% 152 High -Cube lAutomated) Warehouse 1,000 s1 532 315 53.1% $16 57 -565% 51,653 $770 -53.4% 110 General Light Industrial 1,00061 $65 $63 -3.1% 332 131 -3.1% 33,324 33,235 -2.7% n/a Concrete Plant aCre 5138 5141 2.2% $69 $70 1.4% 57,097 37,250 2.2% n/a Sand Mining acre 321 518 -143% $11 59 -18.2% 51,101 5929 -15.6% RETAIL: 820 Retail 1,000 sfgla 5105 5159 51.4% 552 379 51.9% $5,399 58,177 51.5% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Stationwilh or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. $135 5127 -5.9% 367 364 -4.5% 56,937 56,546 .5.6% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 5226 3185 -18.1% 5113 593 -17.7% 511,663 59552 .18.1% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sf 5544 5503 .7.5% 5272 5252 -7.4% 328,021 525,916 -7.5% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/0rive-Thru 1,0006$ 5804 $1,028 27.9% 3402 5514 27.9% $41,407 552,937 27.8% 850 Supermarket 1,000 61 3258 5208 -19.4% 5129 5104 -19.4% 513,299 310,713 -19.4% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,0005) 5161 5150 .6.8% 581 575 -713% 38,296 $7,743 -6.7% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 5318 5110 -65.4% 5159 555 -6513% 316,358 55,654 -65.4% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,00061 5572 $543 -5.1% 5286 5271 -5.2% 329,445 527,953 -5.1% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 536 530 .16.7% $18 515 -16.7% 31,868 51,565 -16.2% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 5257 5365 42.0% $129 3182 41.1% 513,246 518,781 41.8% 492 Racquet Club/Health aub/Dance Studio 1,000 s1 5249 $301 20.9% 5125 5150 20014 312,845 515,976 20.5% 412 County ParkiCre 318 520 11.195 39 310 11.120 5928 51,022 10.1% 491 Tennis Court court 5274 5347 26.6% 3137 5173 26320 $14,103 517,862 26.7% 420 Marina boat berth 322 532 455% 511 $16 455% 31,150 $1,628 41.6% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000 s1 5312 3339 8.7% 5156 3169 8.3% 516,062 317,946 8.6% 590 Library 1,00051 5383 5544 42.096 3191 5272 42.4% 319,700 528,016 42.720 733 Government Office Complec 1,000 s1 $197 5220 11.7% $99 3110 11.1% 510,170 311,349 11.6% 571 tail bed 517 556 229.4% 59 528 2111% 5897 52,860 218.820 MISCEILANEOIA: 565 Day Care Center 1,000 s1 5199 3171 -14.1% $99 586 -13.1% 310,246 58,810 -141320 610 Hospital 1,0005( 3128 $129 0.8% 564 365 1.6% 36,593 56,658 1.0% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 5101 5343 239.6% 550 5172 2440% 35,181 817,678 241.2% 560 Church 1,000 s1 559 558 -1.7% 530 329 -3395 33,053 52,991 -2.0% 444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen 5568 $395 -30.5% 3284 5198 -303% 529,243 520,346 -30.4% 520 Elementary School (Private, 8-5) student $5 $8 60.0% $2 $4 100.094 5248 5416 67.7% 522 Middle School (Private, 613) student 35 511 120.0% 52 55 150A% 5248 5564 127.4% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student $13 512 -7.7% $7 36 -14.3% 5674 $598 -11.3% 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student 515 521 40.0% $8 511 375% 5778 51,084 39.3% n/a Fire Station 1,000 s1 530 523 .233% 515 511 -26.7% 31,530 31,174 -23.3% 'For Educational Facilities Impact Fee, the Single Family (detached) rate should also be used l r'Single Tamil Attached/Townhouse' resident.) land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 1-6 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study foot for high schools are used in this study, which is based on the insurance values that are also consistent with costs obtained from other Florida jurisdictions and represent a conservative estimate. Table G-2 Construction Cost Analysis — Indian River County Net Year Construction (�) Facility Name(2) Permanent Built Cost(3) (4) Square Feet 2009 Storm Grove Middle School $34,106,673 141,066 Constrution Cost per NSF (5) $242 2012 Vero Beach Elementary $17,243,103 110,495 $156 Educational Plant Survey Estimates for School Additions (6) $228 - $343 Insurance Values of Existing School Buildings:(') - Elementary Schools $146 - Middle Schools $175 - High Schools $186 - All Traditional Schools $165 (1), (2), (3) (4) Source: Indian River County School District (5) Construction cost (Item 3) divided by net permanent square feet (Item 4) (6) Source: IRC School District Educational Plant Five Year Survey Report, August 23, 2013 (7) Source: IRC Statement of Values for School Facilities, 2013 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 G-3 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table G-3 Construction Cost Analysis — Other Florida Jurisdictions Year Built Elementary Schools Construction Construction County Facility Name/Type Total Cost Net Sq. Ft. Cost per Cost Net SF 2011 Charlotte Meadow Park Elementary $12,696,116 $18,415,280 89,652 $142 2011 Duval Waterleaf Elementary $14,882,021 $24,786,442 82,062 $181 2011 Escambia Global Learning Academy $17,019,155 $24,108,501 120,015 $142 2011 Osceola Highlands Elementary $14,534,309 $18,145,244 106,918 $136 2011 Pasco Connerton Elementary "R" $11,598,590 $19,102,688 84,972 $136 Total/Weighted Average -- Elementary Schools $70,730,191 $104,558,155 483,619 $146 Middle Schools 2011 Dade North Dade Middle $18,921,534 $21,216,883 94,660 $200 2011 Orange Lake Nona Middle $16,923,455 $23,466,083 149,897 $113 2011 Polk Boone Middle $17,900,963 $20,312,468 69,921 $256 2011 Walton Emerald Coast Middle $15,918,884 $25,134,830 126,770 $126 Total/Weighted Average -- Middle Schools $69,664,836 $90,130,264 441,248 $158 High Schools 2011 Broward Lanier James Education Center $8,889,147 $12,412,686 42,608 $209 2011 Calhoun Blountstown High $19,407,910 $25,135,928 100,366 $193 2011 Charlotte Charlotte High $61,755,842 $92,390,747 258,700 $239 2011 Dade International Studies SHS $7,192,325 $21,846,054 35,137 $205 2011 Dade Medical Academy or Science and Technology $9,303,705 $18,811,197 78,845 $118 2011 Okeechobee Okeechobee Achievement Academy $5,499,975 $6,696,931 43,024 $128 2011 Polk Auburndale Senior $19,522,053 $24,482,933 101,466 $192 2011 Polk Davenport School of the Arts $29,136,512 $32,548,129 157,446 $185 2011 Polk Kathleen Senior $24,323,662 $27,493,666 112,017 $217 2011 Polk Winter Haven Senior $26,374,234 $29,588,106 140,940 $187 Total/Weighted Average -- High Schools $211,405,365 $291,406,377 1,070,549 $197 Total/Weighted Average (All Schools) $351,800,392 $486,094,796 1,995,416 $176 Source: Florida Department of Education Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 G-4 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Architectural, Civil Design, Site Preparation, Furniture, Fixture and Equipment Costs The architectural, civil design, site preparation (including on-site improvement and traffic control costs), and FF&E costs (including technology) are calculated based on the ratio of these costs to the construction costs observed in Indian River County and other jurisdictions. These figures were also discussed with the District's representatives and are estimated at 10 percent of construction for architectural/civil design costs, 10 percent for site preparation costs, and 7 percent for FF&E costs. Tables G-4 and G-5 summarize the data obtained from Indian River County and other jurisdictions. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 G-5 Impact Fee Update Study 270 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table G-4 Architectural/Civil Design and FF&E Cost Analysis Indian River County and Other Florida Jurisdictions Year 2008 Distrix Leon Type Elem Facility Name Conley Elementary School Construction Cost 522,234,866 Architect & Eng Fees $1275420 Ratio of Architect & Eng Fees to Construction Cost 6% FF&E 51,977,175 Ratio of FF&E to Construction Cost 9% 2008 Broward Elem Colbert Elementary $3,576,065 $680,317 19% 5213,389 6% 2008 Charlotte Elem Peace River Elementary School 516,470,888 51,164,074 7% 5293,047 2% 2008 Citrus Elem Central Ridge Elementary 520,066,027 51,293,378 696 5682,662 3% 2008 Clay Elem Oa 'deaf Village Elementary $22,067,755 51,132542 5% 51,497,860 7% 2008 Clay Elem Plantation Oaks Elementary 515,709,595 5927,982 696 5900,000 6% 2008 CI,0 Elem Shadowlawn Elementary $23,666,356 51,091,411 5% 51,544,656 7% 2008 Collier Elem Parkside Elementary $21,099,395 5671,650 3% $2,665,658 13% 2008 Collier Elem Veterans Memorial Elementary 516,957,004 5546,022 3% $2,625,757 15% 2008 Highlands Elem Memorial Elementary 510,296,575 $749,240 7% 51,691,188 16% 2008 Hillsborough Elem Kimbell Elementary 510,540,220 5510,924 5% 51,150,000 1196 2008 Hillsborough Elem Reddick Elementary 513,342,791 $765,913 696 $1,117,452 8% 2008 Lake Elem Grassy Lake Elementary 516,110,171 5607,929 4% 51,572,102 10% 2008 Lake Elem Marcotte Charter Elementary 517,028,093 5552,701 3% 51,414,128 8% 2008 Lake Elem Minneola Charter Elementary 516,878,476 $624,283 496 51,506,036 9% 2008 Lake Elem Sawgrass Bay Elementary 515,816,096 5472,825 3% 51,538,956 10% 2008 Lee Elem Heights Elementary School $21,224,842 5396,000 2% 51,451,720 7% 2008 Lee Elem Treeline Elementary School 515,989,080 $385,950 2% $1,452,508 9% 2008 Orange Elem Conway Elementary School 510,376,998 $550,000 596 $750,000 7% 2008 Orange Elem Lakemont Elementary School 512,830,008 5761,020 6% $912,049 756 2008 Orange Elem Timber Lakes Elementary School 512,465,522 5663,155 596 $968,647 856 2008 Orange Elem Westbrooke Elementary School 513,259,968 5473,978 496 51,000,000 856 2008 Osceola Elem Flora Ridge Elementary 515,804,425 $414,305 3% 52,161,629 1496 2008 Osceola Elem New ES "1" (Harmony Community) 513,632,941 5566,980 4% $2,299,583 17% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Allemande Elementary $23,238,839 51,171,581 5% $879,820 4% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Forest Park Elementary 524,150,475 51,185,476 5% 5779,820 3% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Hagen Ranch Elementary $22,672,614 51,267,703 6% $971,083 456 2008 Palm Beach Elem Palm Beach Gardens Elementary $22,077,886 51,262,407 696 $779,838 4% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Pine Jog Elementary 529,144,023 51,358,825 556 $992,167 3% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Westward Elementary 527,207,724 51,324,188 5% 5869,654 356 2008 Palm Beach Elem Sunset Palms Elementary 524,576,913 51,069,387 456 5997,614 4% 2008 Pasco Elem New River Elementary"M" $11,301,689 5521,935 5% 51,325,467 12% 2008 Pinellas Elem New Heights Elementary $22,910,850 51,374,287 656 51,171,311 5% 2008 Pinellas Elem Tarpon Springs Elementary $19,675,615 5989,498 5% 52,746,022 1456 2008 Polk Elem Horizons Elementary $18,873,956 5557,676 3% 51,642,347 9% 2008 Vol us la Elem Pride Elementary ("Y") $14,935,273 $723,815 556 51,590,038 11% 2008 Walton Elem Mossy Head School $18,827,427 51,021,674 5% 5578,838 3% 2008 St. Lucie High Ft. Pierce Central High School 563,908,401 $2,108,410 3% $3,993,169 6% 2008 Broward High West Broward High 574,974,472 $2,627,821 4% 55,739,011 8% 2008 Franklin High Franklin County Schools 522,955,575 51,395,385 6% $975,000 4% 2008 Lee High Island Coast High School 541,559,854 51,138,351 3% 54,350,121 10% 2008 Pasco High Wiregrass Ranch High School "CCC' 522,880,482 51,045,502 5% $3,502,243 15% 2008 Polk High Tenoroc Senior 560,017596 51,454,175 2% 53,972,131 796 2008 Sarasota High Suncoast Polytechnical High School 511,730,040 $1,030,406 9% 52,160,265 18% 2008 St Johns High Creekside High School ("DDD") $45,425,406 $2,399,921 5% 53,150,626 7% 2008 St. Johns High Ponte Vedra High School CCC 554,638,612 $2,115,456 4% 53,096,813 6% 2008 Leon Middle Montford Middle School 522,008,118 51,345,194 6% $2,049,255 9% 2008 Bay Middle Breakfast Point Academy K-8 525,975,683 $1,463,300 696 51,661,916 6% 2008 Charlotte Middle Punta Gorda Middle School 523,896,506 $1,829,098 8% 5564,072 296 2008 Collier Middle Cypress Palm Middle 526,535,164 51,654,176 6% 53,551,727 13% 2008 Collier Middle Marco Charter Middle 514,450,518 5580,583 4% 5539,228 4% 2008 Duval Middle North Shore K-8 525,222,118 51,690,172 7% 52,651,960 11% 2008 Flagler Middle Bunnell K-8 $17,776,495 51,431,966 8% 51,481,305 856 2008 Hillsborough Middle Smith Middle 520,160,152 5969,246 5% 52,010,000 10% 2008 Lee Middle Oak Hammock Middle School $24,359,562 $623,895 356 51,932,445 8% 2008 Marion Middle Liberty Middle 528,242,481 $753,275 3% 51,391,187 5% 2008 Sarasota Middle Woodland Middle School 531,412,195 $3,004,145 10% 52,077,048 7% 2008 St Lucie Middle Al lapattah Flats K-8 $34,488,744 $2,109,609 696 $4,788,814 1496 2008 St Lucie Middle Palm Pointe Educational Research School at Tradition 524,836,235 51,164,091 5% 54,425,642 1896 2009 Oka loose Elem Riverside Elementary School 511,716,323 51,448,365 12% 53,066,309 2696 2009 Bay Elem Deer Point Elementary 516,646,867 51,046,428 696 51,106,071 7% 2009 Broward Elem Discovery Elementary (K-6) $24,813,884 51,017,051 4% 52,729,823 1196 2009 Broward Elam Heron Heights Elementary $25,377,383 51,101,087 4% 52,821,297 11% 2009 Charlotte Elem East Elementary $14,128,364 51,189,449 8% 5750,180 5% 2009 Collier Elem Eden Park Elementary (K-6) $19,625,793 5743,765 496 $2,824,488 14% 2009 Collier Elem Mike Davis Elementary $18,747,061 5830,774 4% 52,390,841 13% 2009 Duval Elem Bertram Springs Elementary $16,349,939 5942,474 6% 51,752,167 1156 2009 Hillsborough Elem Bailey Elementary 57,308,787 5554,962 8% 51,475,000 20% 2009 Hillsborough Elem Stowers Elementary _ _ 510,360,379 5596,594 696 $1,475,000 1496 2009 Lee Elem Heights Elementary School $20,794,081 5464,500 2% 51,635,759 8% 2009 Lee Elem Lehigh Elementary School 515,702,253 5641,950 4% 5856087 5% 2009 Manatee Elem G.D. Rogers Garden Elementary 512,223,480 51,049,384 996 $788,800 696 2009 Martin Elem Citrus Grove Elementary $21,130,325 $1,067,331 596 $1,280,297 6% 2009 Orange Elem Keenes Crossing Elementary School 512,452,304 $515,371 496 $1,196,557 10% 2009 Osceola Elem KOA Elementary School (Elem L) 512,610,702 5621,750 5% 51,787,818 14% 2009 Osceola El ern Narcoossee Elementary (ES M) 514,770,196 5611,435 4% 51,800,412 1296 2009 Palm Beach El em C.O. Taylor/Kirklane Elementary $35,663,420 51,864,969 596 51,013,080 396 2009 Palm Beach Elem Hope -Centennial Elementary $25,030,950 52,092,633 8% 5868,294 396 2009 Polk Elem Spessard Holland Elementary 515,642,049 5572,492 4% 51,508,553 10% 2009 Sarasota Elem Atwater Elementary School $12,524,430 $1 802 665 1496 5651,817 596 2009 Volusia Elem Champion Elementary $14,696,164 5725,513 596 5950,364 696 2009 Wakulla Elem Riversink Elementary 515,363,460 5817,426 5% 5967,599 6% 2009 Washington Elem Vernon Elementary School 56,259,105 5492,392 896 $267,742 4% 2009 Brevard High Satellite High School 54,736,903 5225,000 5% 5358,000 8% 2009 Brevard High Heritage High School 557,088,946 52,328,706 4% 55,470,874 10% 2009 Hillsborough High Steinbrenner High School $38,437,165 51,588,553 4% $4,945,000 13% 2009 Hillsborough High Strawberry Crest High School $43,204,430 53,051,138 7% 54,945,000 1156 2009 Orange High East River High School $58,970,282 $1,860,628 396 55,304,005 9% 2009 Orange High Lake Nona High School $60,857,702 51,721,299 3% 55,217,696 996 2009 Sarasota High Suncoast Polytechnical High School $11,730,040 51,030,406 996 52,160,265 18% 2009 Walton High Walton Senior High 535,764,000 51,992,342 6% 5645,000 2% 2009 Oka loose Middle Shoal River Middle School 512,779,256 $1,297,594 1096 53,229,106 25% 2009 Duval Middle Westview K-8 _ 529,119,287 52,600719 9% 53,013,790 1056 Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 G-6 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study 271 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table G-4 (continued) Architectural/Civil Design and FF&E Cost Analysis Indian River County and Other Florida Jurisdictions Year 2009 District Hernando Type Middle Facility Name Explorer K-8 Construction Cost $41,212,410 Archited & Eng Fees 51,748584 Ratio of Architect &Eng Fees to Construction Cost 4% FF&E 53,220,587 Ratio of FF&E to Construction Cost 8% 2009 Hillsborough Middle Barrington Middle School 516,315,050 5961,428 6% 52,259,000 14% f2009f India n Riverl"Middle" Storm Grove Middle School M534,106,6731,52,205,007 6% $4,191001 1 12% 2009 lake Middle East Ridge Middle School 527,281,965 51,283,420 5% 52,491,107 9% 2009 Osceola Middle Westside 8-8 School $23,051,370 51,363,350 6% 52,686,144 1296 2009 Sarasota Middle Woodland Middle School 531,412,195 53,004,145 1096 52,077,048 7% 2009 St Johns Middle Liberty Pines Academy (K-8) 525,277,687 5971,288 4% 51,197,445 5% 2010 Broward Eleni Norcrest Elementary 522,286,245 5885,319 4% 51,257,845 6% 2010 Collier Eleni Palmetto Elementary 520,224,743 5889,743 4% 52,671,470 13% 2010 Lake Eleni Sorrento Elemenatry $15,842,160 $668,339 4% $1,896,206 12% 2010 Orange Eleni Old Cheney/North Forsyth Elementary 512,096,899 $783,588 656 5987,926 8% 2010 Osceola Eleni East Lake Elementary 511,747,305 5537,980 5% 51,885,002 16% 2010 Palm Beach Eleni Everglades Elementary $15,940,134 51,863,296 12% 51,075,126 7% 2010 Palm Beach Eleni Northboro Elementary 524,168,146 51,990,621 8% 5780,037 3% 2010 Palm Beach Eleni PI umosa Elementary 521,038,789 52,075,316 1056 5715,049 3% 2010 Seminole Eleni New Midway Elementary 512,297,322 5810,700 796 51,133,007 9% 2010 Clay High Oakleaf High $50,819,745 52,562,240 556 53,064,772 656 2010 Duval High Atlantic Coast High $50,466,294 $5,220,136 10% 55,048,820 10% 2010 Hernando High Weeki Watchee High 533,006,787 51,939,097 6% 54,719,813 14% 2010 Sarasota High Riverview High 578,561,000 55,999,998 8% 54,377,536 6% 2010 Collier High Lorenzo Walker Institute of Technology High 59,843,413 5795,386 8% 51,312,405 1396 2010 Orange High Apopka HS Replacement 570,267,621 $2,112,349 3% 54,733,044 7% 2010 Palm Beach High Palm Beach Gardens Community High 575,097,581 53,829,735 5% 53,330,581 4% 2010 Palm Beach High Suncoast High $59,972,270 53,938,916 756 52,280,000 4% 2010 Volusia High University High $72,990,143 $3,092,214 496 56,096,162 8% 2011 Charlotte Eleni Meadow Park Elementary 512,696,116 5944,273 7% $674,842 5% 2011 Duval Eleni Waterleaf Elementary 514,882,021 51,621,628 11% 51,899,236 13% 2011 Escambia Eleni Global Learning Academy 517,019.155 51,682,415 1056 52,861,931 17% 2011 Osceola Eleni Highlands Elementary 514,534,309 5666,978 5% 51,650,318 11% 2011 Pasco Eleni Connerton Elementary"R" 511,598,590 5858,671 756 51,298,389 11% 2011 Calhoun High Blountstown High 519,407,910 51,968,893 1096 5994,719 5% 2011 Charlotte High Charlotte High 561,755,842 56,502,129 11% 52,676,408 456 2011 Broward High La vier James Education Center 58,889,147 51,075,459 12% 51,304,137 15% 2011 Dade High International Studies 595 57,192,325 5684,965 10% 5757,496 1156 2011 Dade High Medical Academy or Science and Technology $9,303,705 $762,932 8% $919,966 10% 2011 Okeechobee High Okeechobee Achievement Academy 55,499,975 5453,761 8% 5427,114 8% 2011 Polk High Auburndale Senior 519,522,053 51,462,146 7% $3,124,050 16% 2011 Polk High Davenport School of the Arts $29,136,512 51,042,674 456 52,330,971 8% 2011 Polk High Kathleen Senior $24,323,662 $875,094 4% 52,267,250 9% 2011 Polk High Winter Haven Senior $26,374,234 5853,483 3% 52,360,389 9% 2011 Dade Middle North Dade Middle 518,921,534 5867,900 5% $1,122,762 6% 2011 Hernando Middle Winding Waters K-8 514,559,177 5880,709 6% 54,279,500 29% 2011 Orange Middle Lake Nona Middle 516,923,455 $1,277,253 8% 51,795,567 11% 2011 Polk Middle Boone Middle 517,900,963 51,080,157 6% 51,331,348 756 2011 Walton Middle Emerald Coast Middle 515,918,884 51,709,689 11% 5700,000 4% L 2012W ladian AiVpl3—Eleni VYgr_d_Bga.cLagnleililliMBISIIIIIIIII, WIMP 243,103x$1;476006 1.11111111111110xx$1;342512 8% Total/Welghted Average 53,366,044,179 5185,827,182 6% 5281,633,327 MNim8% Total/Weighted Average( RC Schools ONLY) 551,349,776 53,681,013 7% 55,533,513 1156 Total/Weighted Average (ExdudingIRC Schools) 53,314,694,403 5182,146,169 5% 3276,099,814 856 Source: IRC School District for IRC schools; Florida Department of Education for all other jurisdictions Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 G-7 Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table G-5 Site Development Cost Analys's Indian River County and Other Florida Jurisdictions Year 2008 District Leon Type Elem Facility Name Conley Elementary School Construction Cost $22,234,866 Site Improv/Devel $1,363,038 Ratio of Site Development to Construction Cost 6% 2008 Broward Elem Colbert Elementary $3,576,065 $54,751 2% 2008 Charlotte Elem Peace River Elementary School $16,470,888 $2,026,353 12% 2008 Citrus Elem Central Ridge Elementary $20,066,027 $3,200 0% 2008 Clay Elem Plantation Oaks Elementary $15,709,595 $2,001,795 13% 2008 Collier Elem Parksi de Elementary $21,099,395 $609,364 3% 2008 Collier Elem Veterans Memorial Elementary $16,957,004 $554,493 3% 2008 Highlands Elem Memorial Elementary $10,296,575 $2,623522 25% 2008 Hillsborough Elem Kimbell Elementary $10,540,220 $798597 8% 2008 Hillsborough Elem Reddick Elementary $13,342,791 $692,203 5% 2008 Lee Elem Heights Elementary School 521,224,842 $705,540 3% 2008 Lee Elem Treeline Elementary School $15,989,080 51,494,920 9% 2008 Orange Elem Conway Elementary School 510,376,998 $500,000 5% 2008 Orange Elem lakemont Elementary School 512,830,008 $300,967 2% 2008 Orange Elem Timber Lakes Elementary School $12,465,522 51,601,516 13% 2008 Orange Elem Westbrooke Elementary School $13,259,968 51,145,801 9% 2008 Osceola Elem Flora Ridge Elementary $15,804,425 $684,259 4% 2008 Osceola Elem New ES "1" (Harmony Community) $13,632,941 51,300,802 10% 2008 Palm Beach Elem All a manda Elementary $23,238,839 52,192,788 9% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Forest Park Elementary 524,150,475 $3,842,794 16% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Hagen Ranch Elementary 522,672,614 54,135,688 18% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Palm Beach Gardens Elementary $22,077,886 $3,007,648 14% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Pine Jog Elementary 529,144,023 $2,874,817 10% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Westward Elementary $27,207,724 $705,832 3% 2008 Palm Beach Elem Sunset Palms Elementary 524,576,913 $1,359,139 6% 2008 Pasco Elem New River Elementary"M" 511,301,689 $2,134,030 19% 2008 Pinellas Elem New Heights Elementary $22,910,850 $2,778,418 12% 2008 Pinellas Elem Tarpon Springs Elementary $19,675,615 $2,740,407 14% 2008 Volusia Elem Pride Elementary ("Y") 514,935,273 $1,296,294 9% 2008 Walton Elem Mossy Head School 518,827,427 $32,000 0% 2008 St. Lucie High Ft. Pierce Central High School $63,908,401 $5,309,308 8% 2008 Broward High West Broward High 574,974,472 5149,041 0% 2008 Franklin High Franklin County Schools $22,955,575 5500,000 2% 2008 Lee High Island Coast High School 541,559,854 $5,418,852 13% 2008 Pasco High Wiregrass Ranch High School"CCC" $22,880,482 $4536,580 20% 2008 Sarasota High Suncoast Polytech nical High School 511,730,040 $1,463,101 12% 2008 Leon Middle Montford Middle School $22,008,118 $39,230 0% 2008 Bay Middle Breakfast Point Academy K-8 $25,975,683 $3,838,363 15% 2008 Charlotte Middle Punta Gorda Middle School 523,896,506 $2,968,607 12% 2008 Collier Middle Cypress Palm Middle 526,535,164 $619584 2% 2008 Collier Middle Marco Charter Middle 514,450,518 598,219 1% 2008 Duval Middle North Shore K-8 525,222,118 5450,000 2% 2008 Flagler Middle Bunnell K-8 517,776,495 $1,168,123 7% 2008 Hillsborough Middle Smith Middle 520,160,152 $932,385 5% 2008 Lee Middle Oak Hammock Middle School $24,359,562 5885,000 4% 2008 Marion Middle Liberty Middle $28,242,481 53,687,549 13% 2008 Sarasota Middle Woodland Middle School 531,412,195 $6,909,752 22% 2008 St. Lucie Middle Allapattah Flats K-8 534,488,744 $3,351,476 10% 2008 St. Lucie Middle Palm Pointe Educational Research School at Tradition $24,836,235 $4,993,386 20% 2009 Okaloosa Elem Riverside Elementary School 511,716,323 52,148,260 18% 2009 Ba/ Elem Deer Point Elementary $16,646,867 51,711,350 10% 2009 Broward Elem Discovery Elementary (K-6) $24,813,884 $3,397 0% 2009 Charlotte Elem East Elementary $14,128,364 $1,389,286 10% 2009 Collier Elem Eden Park Elementary(K-6) 519,625,793 $2,083,000 1156 2009 Collier Elem Mike Davis Elementary 518,747,061 $1,722,320 9% 2009 Duval Elem Bartram Springs Elementary $16,349,939 51,427,211 9% 2009 Hillsborough Elem Bailey Elementary 57,308,787 5753,646 10% 2009 Hillsborough Elem Stowers Elementary 510,360,379 5941,642 9% 2009 Lee Elem Heights Elementary School $20,794,081 $220,848 1% 2009 Lee Elem Lehigh Elementary School $15,702,253 5679,758 4% 2009 Manatee Elem G.D. Rogers Garden Elementary $12,223,480 5969,092 8% 2009 Martin Elem Citrus Grove Elementary 521,130,325 5722,012 3% 2009 Orange Elem Keene's Crossing Elementary School 512,452,304 51,487,617 12% 2009 Osceola Elem KOA Elementary School (Elem L) 512,610,702 51,874,555 15% 2009 Osceola Elem Narcoos see Elementary (ES M) 514,770,196 5631,727 4% 2009 Palm Beach Elem C.O. Taylor/Ki rkl a ne Elementary 535,663,420 53,628,916 1056 2009 Palm Beach Elem Hope -Centennial Elementary $25,030,950 $2,733,790 11% 2009 Sarasota Elem Atwater Elementary School 512,524,430 54,737,875 38% 2009 Volusia Elem Champion Elementary 514,696,164 51,615,729 11% 2009 Wakulla Elem Riversink Elementary $15,363,460 51,300,000 8% 2009 Washington Elem Vernon Elementary School 56,259,105 $450,421 7% 2009 Brevard High Satellite High School $4,736,903 5307,888 6% 2009 Brevard High Heritage High School $57,088,946 $628,370 1% 2009 Hillsborough High Steinbrenner High School 538,437,165 54,391,015 11% 2009 Hillsborough High Strawberry Crest High School $43,204,430 53,443,506 8% 2009 Orange High East River High School 558,970,282 510,333,793 18% Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 G-8 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Z, 73 Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table G-5 (continued) Site Development Cost Analysis Indian River County and Other Florida Jurisdictions Year 2009 District Orange Type High Facility Name Lake Nona High School Construction Cost $60,857,702 Site Improv/Devel $7,186702 Ratio of Site Development to Construction Cost 12% 2009 Sarasota High Suncoast Polytechnical High School 511,730,040 51,463,101 12% 2009 Walton High Walton Senior High 535,764,000 $50,000 0% 2009 Oka loose Middle Shoal River Middle School $12,779,256 52,170,119 17% 2009 Duval Middle Westview K-8 $29,119,287 $1,708,817 6% 2009 Hernando Middle Explorer K-8 541,212,410 51,200,000 3% 2009 Hillsborough Middle Barrington Middle School $16,315,050 51,368,167 8% 1112009T I Rrver Middle Ston Grove Middle $chool 341106`673 Iiiiilt$66299160 X19% 2009 nch a n Lake Middle _ __ ______ . __. East Ridge Middle School 527,281,965 $599,565 2% 2009 Osceola Middle Westside K-8 School 523,051,370 $2,162,558 9% 2009 Sarasota Middle Woodland Middle School 531,412,195 $6,909,752 22% 2010 Broward Elem Norcrest Elementary $22,286,245 $37,949 0% 2010 Collier Elem Palmetto Elementary 520,224,743 $2,440,985 12% 2010 Lake Elem Sorrento Elemenatry $15,842,160 $48,712 0% 2010 Orange Elem Old Cheney/North Forsyth Elementary $12,096,899 $1,815,172 15% 2010 Osceola Elem East Lake Elementary $11,747305 $1,255,467 11% 2010 Palm Beach Elem Everglades Elementary $15,940,134 52,286,725 14% 2010 Palm Beach Elem Northboro Elementary 524,168,146 51,482,606 6% 2010 Palm Beach Elem Plumos a Elementary 521,038,789 51,967,540 9% 2010 Clay High Oakleaf High $50,819,745 5274,000 1% 2010 Duval High Atlantic Coast High $50,466,294 $7,648,460 15% 2010 Sarasota High Riverview High $78,561,000 514,665,000 19% 2010 Collier High Lorenzo Walker Institute of Technology High $9,843,413 $287,278 3% 2010 Orange High Apopka HS Replacement $70,267,621 $9,439,283 13% 2010 Palm Beach High Palm Beach Gardens Community High $75,097,581 510,693,532 14% 2010 Palm Beach High Suncoast High 559,972,270 $9,785,603 16% 2010 Volusia High University High $72,990,143 $12,232,947 17% 2011 Charlotte Elem Meadow Park Elementary $12,696,116 $1,802,689 14% 2011 Duval Elem Waterleaf Elementary $14,882,021 51,361,500 9% 2011 Escambia Elem Global Learning Academy $17,019,155 $200,000 1% 2011 Osceola Elem Highlands Elementary 514,534,309 51,293,639 9% 2011 Pasco Elem Connerton Elementary "8" 511,598,590 $2,313,586 20% 2011 Calhoun High Blountstown High $19,407,910 $1,362,604 7% 2011 Charlotte High Charlotte High 561,755,842 $7,904,370 13% 2011 Broward High Lanier James Education Center $8,889,147 5918,943 10% 2011 Okeechobee High Okeechobee Achievement Academy $5,499,975 51,300 0% 2011 Walton Middle Emerald Coast Middle $15,918,884 $1,717,116 11% •2012.N.pian Riverll •Ele7 Vero Beach Elements rye mIt$17?243?103 111111111C-1.272 1.11111.1 Total/Weighted Average $2,779,762,814 $273,373,775 10% Total/Weighted Average ( RC Schools ONLY) $51,349,776 $8,101,432 16% Total/Weighted Average (Excluding IRC Schools) $2,728,413,038 $265,272,343 10% Source: IRC School District for IRC schools; Florida Department of Education for all other jurisdictions Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 G-9 Impact Fee Update Study 274 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Land Value Analysis To estimate the current land value the following analysis is conducted: • A review of current market value of land from the Property Appraiser database where the existing schools are located; • An analysis of vacant land sales in Indian River County over the past three years for parcels of necessary size; and • An analysis of market value of all vacant land from the Property Appraiser database for parcels of necessary size. The current value of existing school sites and vacant land value of parcels with similar sizes ranged from $10,000 per acre to $32,000 per acre. Vacant land sales of parcels with similar size over the past three years indicated a range of $18,000 per acre to $130,000 per acre. This data is summarized in Table G-6. Based on this information, an average value of $50,000 per acre is used in the impact fee calculations. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 G-10 Impact Fee Update Study 2-7,C Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table G-6 Land Value Analysis Variable Year Average Land Value per Acre Value of Current Parcels: - Elementary 2013 $28,697 - Middle 2013 $10,745 - High 2013 $17,639 -All Traditional Schools 2013 $20,171 Value of Vacant Land: West IRC - Residential -15 to 25 acres 2013 $21,353 -20to60acres 2013 $18,612 - 60 to 100 acres 2013 $19,445 - 40 to 130 acres 2013 $19,851 West IRC- All Land Uses - 15 to 25 acres 2013 $22,622 - 20 to 60 acres 2013 $22,181 - 60 to 100 acres 2013 $19,445 - 40 to 130 acres 2013 $19,851 Countywide - Residential -15 to 25 acres 2013 $26,160 - 20 to 60 acres 2013 $19,602 - 60 to 100 acres 2013 $19,193 - 40 to 130 acres 2013 $19,288 Countywide - All Land Uses - 15 to 25 acres 2013 $31,644 - 20 to 60 acres 2013 $20,884 - 60 to 100 acres 2013 $19,193 - 40 to 130 acres 2013 $19,288 Vacant Land Sales: West IRC- Residential - 15 to 25 acres 2010-2012 $95,109 - 20 to 60 acres 2010-2012 $74,877 - 60 to 100 acres 2010-2012 $17,704 - 40 to 130 acres 2010-2012 $47,197 West IRC - All Land Uses -15 to 25 acres 2010-2012 $97,836 - 20 to 60 acres 2010-2012 $74,877 - 60 to 100 acres 2010-2012 $17,704 - 40 to 130 acres 2010-2012 $47,197 Countywide - Residential - 15 to 25 acres 2010-2012 $124,315 - 20 to 60 acres 2010-2012 $85,304 - 60 to 100 acres 2010-2012 $17,704 - 40 to 130 acres 2010-2012 $39,883 Countywide - All Land Uses - 15 to 25 acres 2010-2012 $130,357 - 20 to 60 acres 2010-2012 $85,304 - 60 to 100 acres 2010-2012 $17,704 - 40 to 130 acres 2010-2012 $39,883 Used in the Study 2013 $50,000 Source: Indian River County Property Appraiser's Database Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 G-11 Impact Fee Update Study 27� Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Appendix H Administrative Fee 177 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Administrative Fee The Florida Impact Fee Act, Florida Statute (F.S.) 163.31801, requires that administrative charges for the collection of impact fees be limited to actual costs. Examples of typical administrative costs include: • Personnel expenses associated with the administration of the program (e.g., salary and fringe of the impact fee coordinator and other staff responsible with the administration of the program, etc.); • Cost of the technical studies and other consulting fees; • Attorney costs related to impact fee matters; and • Other central cost allocation (a portion of the time spent by the County Manager, various County Departments, etc.). The administrative cost can be taken out of the revenues or can be added to the adopted fee levels. At this time, Indian River County collects 2.5 percent of the impact fee in addition to the impact fee amount. This amount increases to 3 percent within the cities, with the County retaining 1 percent and each City retaining the remaining 2 percent. The County tracks the administrative costs, which are presented in the following table for the past five years. Between 2008 and 2012, the average annual expense associated with the administration of the impact fee program was approximately $178,000. During the same time period, the County collected an average of $1.1 million of impact fees per year. This suggests that the administrative cost is approximately 15 percent of the collections. As such, the 2.5 -percent fee that the County is collecting represents a conservative approach and will continue to be so until the impact fee revenues reach to approximately $7 million per year. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 H-1 Impact Fee Update Study 277 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table H-1 Administrative Expense Expense Personnel 2008 $50,635 2009 $76,088 2010 $96,007 2011 $88,567 2012 $86,121 Total $397,417 General &Administrative $6,212 $7,456 $9,285 $9,083 $8,467 $40,503 Other Professional Services $29,466 $0 $2,100 $14,003 $101,610 $147,179 Interdepartmental Charges $54,597 $51,721 $56,357 $59,697 $74,689 $297,062 Supplies, Equipment & Other $722 $2,015 $1,495 $773 $1,813 $6,817 Total $141,632 $137,280 $165,243 $172,123 $272,699 $888,977 Annual Impact Fee Collections $2,396,539 $596,338 $618,892 $759,760 $1,102,670 $5,474,199 %Administrative Expense 6% 23% 27% 23% 25% 16% Average Annual Administrative Expense $177,795 Average Annual Impact Fee Collections $1,094,840 %Administrative Expense =MR Source: Indian River County TOA conducted research to understand how other jurisdictions address this issue. The following is a summary of the information obtained: • Brevard County's impact fee ordinances indicate different administrative fee percentages for each impact fee program area, which are used to limit the amount taken out of the collected fees for administrative costs, and are not charged in addition to the adopted fees. The ordinances include the following general language: "The Board of County Commissioners shall be entitled to, but not more than, X% of the funds collected pursuant to this division, to compensate for the administrative expense of collecting and administrating this impact fee program. All remaining funds collected from impact fees shall be used for the purpose of capital improvements to, and expansion of, the county's infrastructure programs." The allowed percentage is 2% in the case of solid waste impact fee, 5% in the case of library impact fee, and 8% in the case of correctional facilities, fire rescue, EMS, and roads impact fees. In the case of educational facilities impact fee, the interlocal agreement between the County and the School District reads, "The County is entitled to retain up to, but not more than, 2.5% of the amount of educational facilities impact fees collected for administration of the ordinance. In calculating the amount of administrative fee, the County shall include those expenditures that are reasonably associated with the Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 H-2 Impact Fee Update Study 2-71 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study administration of the program. These expenditures may include but are not limited to, compensation and benefits for personnel involved in the administration of the ordinance; supplies and expenses related to administration of the ordinance; costs associated with consulting services for establishment and periodic updates of the ordinance; and those attorneys fees that may be necessary for administration and enforcement of the ordinance. The County acknowledges that it administers other impact fee programs not related to public educational facilities and pledges to consolidate its administrative efforts in order to cost effectively administer all impact fee programs. When shared administrative costs cannot be isolated by specific impact fee program, the County shall prorate those costs based on amount of revenue collected with each program." • Collier County does not collect an additional percentage but uses a portion of impact fee revenues to offset the related administrative costs. The County keeps track of these costs and distributes them among impact fee accounts for different program areas. In the case of educationa facilities impact fee, Collier County's interlocal agreement requires that the School District pays the County $6.25 per $1,000 of collections (0.625 percent). This amount is not added to the impact fee, but rather, is taken out of the gross collections. • Osceola County's Impact Fee Ordinance the following language: "Actual administrative costs for the county will be determined and will be adopted by resolution and will be reviewed annually. The administrative fee will be determined by comparing actual program expenditures to actual collections for the completed fiscal year immediately preceding the calculation. Cost will be allocated to each type of impact fee based on the best estimate by the impact fee coordinator of time spent on each type. This fee will be in addition to the impact fee." In addition, Osceola County's interlocal agreement states that "To reimburse the County, Kissimmee, and St. Cloud for cost of collecting impact fees, each may charge an administrative fee in addition to the Impact Fee, not to exceed the actual cost of collection." Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 H-3 Impact Fee Update Study Z80 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study • Volusia County collects a 3 -percent administrative fee in addition to the adopted impact fee. Given these findings and the State requirements, Indian River County's administrative fee of 2.5% is found to be a conservative amount and is consistent with practices of other communities in Florida. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 H-4 Impact Fee Update Study 2$ I Appendix I Master Fee Schedules: Full Calculated Fee Rates 181 Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 1-1 Master Fee Schedule - Full Calculated Fee; Unincorporated County Correctional ratili000 ITC LLiC Land Use Unit 2009 Perten Adopted Rate full Calculated Chance • RESIDEN70AL. solid wale hti6tles 2009 Percent Adopted Rate cu110akulatd Chance Public BuiWinea 2009 01147 Adopted Rate Full [okuWted Chan[p 11braries 2009 verunt AtloDtetl Rate iuIIG lwMtd [hanec _- Eme[enry Services 2009 Percent Adapted Ralo fu0 [alwlated coon[e Lay. Enforcement 2009 Penal Adopted Ante lull CNculateA [fango - ---- 210 Single Farrah/ (detched) - Ins than 1,000 sf du 5151 5251 66.2% 575 5127 693% 5163 5648 254.1% $430 5611 42.1% 5247 5774 10.9% 5218 5381 74894 .1,000 to 1,499 sf du 5151 5270 788% 575 $137 82.7% 5183 5606 2803% 5430 5657 528% 5247 5296 19.8% 5218 5411 863% - 1,500 O2,499 if du 5170 5287 68856 575 5146 94.7% 5206 5739 258.7% 5453 5700 44.956 5278 5314 12.9% 5245 5436 780% -2500 sl or larger du 5184 5320 73.9% 575 5163 1173% 5223 $826 270.4% , 5524 5781 490% 5301 5348 15.6% 5265 5485 83.0% 220 Multi-F004ly/721e3100y Unit du 5100 5162 620% 557 $83 45.6% 5121 5418 2453% 5285 5397 393% 5176 5181 2.8% 5148 $249 66.2% 240 Mobile Horne/RV Wed down) dv 5123 5183 488% 575 593 24.0% 5149 5470 215.4% ' 3349 5446 278% $182 5197 8.2% 5158 5244 54.4% 7FO,GROUP: - --- 7RANMNT,ASS6• - - - - 310 Hotel MOM 395 5121 22.2% 521 50 -100.0% 5229 5312 36.2% n/5 n/a n/a 5160 5131 .18.1% 5140 5178 27.1% 320 MotelMOT 599 5112 13.1% 521 50 -100.0% 5229 5288 258% 73/8 73/8 Ne 5160 5121 .24.0% 5140 5164 17.1% 620 Nursing Home bed 5107 5171 598% 533 50 .1000% $312 5442 41.7% Na n/a 73/8 5172 5185 7.6% 5151 5252 66.9% 252 Assisted Care WA ng Facility (40155 bed 5107 5171 59815 $62 $0 -100.0% 5312 3442 41.7% n/a n/a n/a 5172 5185 7.6% 5151 5252 66.9% - OFFICE&FINANCWI: •. •- ••. .. .- - - - 720 Mdn l l Office/Clinic 10,00087 or les 1 000 sr 5186 5312 10.0% 5118 $0 .1000% 51.275 5547 .57.1% 4/4 4/4 73/8 5299 5229 -23.4% 5262 $312 19.1% Medical Offce/Oinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 s1 5186 5309 66.1%. 5118 50 .1000% 51,275 5797 -373% n/a N4 73/8 $299 5334 11.7% 5262 5455 73.7% 911 6876/Savngs Walk -In 1,000 s1 5212 $415 958% 5118 50 .100050 51,494 51,071 .263% n/a n/a 4/4 5341 5449 31.7% 5299 5611 1043% 912 Bank/Saving, 0rlvNn 1,000 s1 5174 5425 1443% 5118 50 .100.0% 51,191 51,095 -8.1% n/a n/a n/a $280 5459 63.9% 5245 5625 155.1% 710 General Office 1,0008! 5153 $186 21.6% 594 $0 .100,056 51,050 5480 .543% Na No n/a 5246 5201 -163% 5216 5274 26.9% 760 Research h Development Center 1,000 s1 581 5158 95.1%x, 594 50 -1000% 5555 $408 -265% 47/8 Nn 73/8 5130 5171 31.5% 5114 5233 104.4% ..._..._100037141 ..... .. ....... .... ._.i ... -.�. -._. - _ .- ..-..- - - - _..-. - _. ._.. - .. _.. .. 140 Manufacturing 1,000 51 555 593 69.1% 5236 50 -100.0% 5375 5240 .360% Na Na n/8 588 5101 14.8% 577 5137 77.9% 150 Warehousing 1 000 s1 542 552 23.8% , 547 50 .1000% 5288 5134 -535% Ne Ne n/8 568 556 -17.6% $59 577 30.5% 151 Mlnl.Warehouse 1,00081 $8 511 375% 519 50 .1000% 540 529 -273%, n/a Na 73/8 513 512 -7.]% 512 516 333% 152 IlighCube(Autorratd) Warehouse 1,00081 542 526 -38.1% 547 50 -1000% 5288 567 .76.7% n/a Na n/a 568 $28 .588% $59 538 -35.6% 110 General 01ht lndu0514l 1,000 s1 575 5129 72.0% 5236 50 -100.0% 5512 5331 -35A% 73/8 7/8 n/a 5120 5139 15815 5105 5189 80.0% Na Concrete Plant dele 5165 5289 75.2% 5213 50 -1000% 51,130 5744 -34.2% n/0 7/4 n/a 5265 5312 17.7% 5232 5425 83.2% n/a Sad Mining acre 511 537 761% 5213 50 -1000% 5145 596 -338% Na Ne 73/8 534 540 17.6% 530 555 833% r .. �,-. -.. - ._ . .. . .. ... .. .... _ a.. .. 820 Retail 1,000 stela 5312 $441 41.3% 5236 50 -100.0% 51,531 51,138 -25.795 Na No 0/8 5503 5477 -5.2% 5441 5650 47.4% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Radon with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 5188 5356 894% 539 50 4000% 5921 5917 -0A% 0/8 Na n/a 5303 5385 27.1% 5265 5523 97.4% 841 Ne0/0s44Auto Sale, 1,00081 5186 5274 473% 5118 50 -1000% 5912 5706 -22.6% n/a No 73/8 5300 5295 -1354 5263 5403 53.2% 932 Restaurant 1,00081 5800 51,263 57.9% 5330 50 -1000% 53,923 53,255 .17015 73/8 Na n/8 51,289 51,365 5.9% 51,129 55,858 64.6% 934 fast Food Rnt41)rlao lhru 100081 5863 51,658 92.1% 5330 50 -100,094 54,227 54,273 1.1% . 0/8 47/7 n/a 51,389 51,792 29.0% 51,217 52,439 100A% 850 Supermarket 1,0008! 5222 5382 72.1% 5474 50 -1000% $1,087 5904 -95% Na Nn n/a - 5357 5413 15.7% 5313 5562 79.6% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,00086 570 5279 298.6% $20 50 -100.0% 5134 5720 4373% Na 4/4 n/a 5107 5302 182.2% 5114 5411 260.5% 947 Self-6edceCar Wash service bay 5206 5162 -211% 577 50 -100.0% 51.009 5418 -56.6% 73/8 4/4 Na 5331 5175 '473% 5291 5138 .181% 853 Convenience Market with Gal Pumps 1,00081 5463 51,086 134.6% $424 50 -100.0% $2,270 52,799 233% n/a n/a n/a 5746 51,174 57.4% 5653 51,598 144.7% 890 furniture Store 1,000 s1 535 543 22.9% 5236 50 -1000% 5170 5110 -353% Na Na 0/4 556 $46 -17.9% $49 563 28.6% ... .... .,.. _... .. �- ,.� .... r.. e- .. -__ M1 4� ... ._.,.._.. .. ._ .. .. .. -.. .. . . 430 Golf Course hole 5267 5201 -24.7% $38 $0 -1000% 51,307 5518 -60.4% n/a Na 0/8 5429 5217 49.4% 5376 5296 .213% 492 Racquet ClubMealt Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf 5259 5575 1220% 5118 50 -100.0% 51,270 51,483 168% n/8 Na n/a 5417 5622 49.2% 5316 5847 131,4% 412 Ceunry Part 81fe 517 537 117.6% 585 50 -100.0% 581 596 165% Na No n/a 527 540 48.1% 523 555 139.1% 491 Tennis Court court 5253 5589 1328% 518 50 .1000% 51,241 51517 22.2% Na n/0 73/8 5408 5636 55.9% 5357 5866 142.6% 420 Marina boat berth 517 $35 105.9% 545 50 -100.0% 582 591 110% ' Na 4/4 n/a 527 533 40.7% 524 552 116.7% ..,...a.... GOVERNMENTAL•e.�- .. .. _ .............4., . ..... . - _. _ ... ... _ .., .. .....rt e..._...,. _. »... .v.wa.,v. ,.._.... _ .._ 732 Post Office 1,00056 5194 5302 55.7% 594 $0 -100.0% 51,107 5778 -29.7% Na Ne 73/8 $312 5326 45% 5273 5444 62.6% 590 Library 1,000 86 5188 5328 743% 594 $0 -100,054 5919 $845 -8.1% n/a n/a 73/8 5302 5354 171% 5265 $482 81.9% 733 Government 0ffce Complex 1,0008! 5148 5259 75.0% 594 50 -100.0% n/a n/a n/a , Na n/a n/a 5238 5280 17.6% 5209 5381 323% 571 /all bed 73/8 Na Ma $16 $0 -100.0% $466 5667 43.1% n/a n/a 73/8 5153 5175 14.4% 5134 $238 77.6% a._...a..,w MISCfl1ANEOWi. __.. ..- , -"- - ._. .r A.- _. -_. ... ...a a rs.._._ �._��._�, ._ ''.-r.... -.... _ _ . ..-. _ - .. _ _ ._ ._.. .. _ .-,� ,..-._ •-- 565 Day Caro Center 1,000s1 5110 3166 50.9% 5236 500 -1000% 5755 5427 43.4541 Na 4/4 0/8 5177 $179 1.1% 5155 5244 57014 610 Hospital 1,0008! 5171 5255 49.1% 583 50 -100.0% $838 5658 -213% 0/a Na 73/8 5275 5276 0A% 5241 5375 95.6% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,00056 5178 5473 165.7% 5118 $0 -100.0% 51,223 51,219 -03% n/a Ne n/a 5287 $511 780% 5251 5696 1773% 560 Church 1,000 at 558 $95 63.8% 533 50 -1000% 5285 5245 -14056' 73/8 n/a 0/a 594 5103 9.6% 582 5140 70.7% 444 Moyle Theater w/Matinee Itreert 5925 513.14 20.4% $188 50 -100.0% 54535 52,871 -36.7%: 0/8 n/a n/a 51,490 $1,204 -19,2% 51,305 51,639 25.6% 520 Elementary School 5007045.11-6) student 510 511 10A% 512 $0 -100.0% 570 $29 .58.6%- n/a n/a 0/4 517 512 .29.4% $14 516 143% 522 Middle School 5Private.6-95 student $10 $13 30.0% 512 $0 .1000% 570 534 .514% ' N8 Ne 0/ 517 514 -17.6% 514 519 35.7% 530 High School [Private, 9.12) student 513 $15 15.4% 513 50 -100.0% $90 538 .578% 0/1 n/a 0/8 521 $16 -238% 510 $22 223% 540/550 University/huller College (7,500 or fewer students) student 511 519 72.7% 513 $0 -1000% 578 548 -38.5% Na n/a Na 518 520 11.1% 516 527 68.8% Na 0,850don 1,000 i1 569 5117 69.6% 594 50 -100.0% 5339 5302 00.9% n/a n/a Na' Na Na Na 597 5173 78.4% 'For Educa0onal Facilities Impact Fee, the Single Fadly(detachd) rate should also be used for 'Single FaD87 Anachd/Townhouse' 7e14en6 Iland use Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 I-1 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Appendix J Master Fee Schedules: Affordable Growth Fee Rates Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table J-1 Master Fee Schedule -Affordable Growth Fee; Unincorporated Coun 116 LUC Land Use Correctional Facilities Unit 2009 Affordable Percent Ad0pta4 Rate Growth Change . Solid Wale fadltiel 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Public8wI4ings 2009 Affeedn011 Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Libraries 2009 Affordably Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Emergency Services 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Law rotnrnment 1009 449044abla Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 11 du 5151 50 -1000% 525 50 -100090 5183 $648 254.1% 5430 5582 36.5% 5247 $30 -87.9% 5018 5381 24.8% .1400 to 1,499 81 du 5151 50 -100.090 575 $0 -100090 5183 5696 2803% $430 $631 46.1% 5242 533 46.6% 5218 5411 885% - 1,500 to 2A99 11 du 5170 50 •100.016 575 50 -100014 5206 5739 258.2% 5483 5672 39.1% 5278 535 420% 5245 $436 28.0% -2,500 sf or larger du 5184 50 .180,0% 525 50 -100090. 5223 5826 220.490 5524 5250 43.190. 5301 538 42.490 5265 5485 830% 220 Mul4-Fane Iv/010ess77y Unit du 5100 50 -100.090 552 50 -100.090 5122 5418 245590 5285 5381 33.2% 5126 520 48.690 5148 5249 68.2% 240 Mobile Nonw/6v(4ed down) du 5123 50 -100090 $75 50 -100.090 5149 5470 2154% 5349 5428 22.5% $182 522 42.990 5158 $244 54.416 ., TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP:-- . • .' - 310 Hotel 599 50 .100490 521 50 -100.090 5229 5162 -29390 0/a 7/4 n/4 5160 $0 .2000% 5140 5178 22.190 320 MOM200111 599 50 .2000% 521 50 -10004 5229 5150 .343% n/a Ma oh 5160 SO .100.0% 5140 5164 12.116 620 Nursing Nome bed 5102 $0 -200.0% $33 50 .100.0% 5312 5230 -263% n/a n/8 n/a 5172 50 .100.0% 5151 5252 66.916 152 Assisted Care living Facility (ACV) bed 5107 50 -100.016 562 $0 .100.0% $312 5230 .263% n/a n/a n/a 5172 $0 -100.0% 5151 5252 66.9% ..... . . OFFICE 4 NNANCWI:._.....r--. ,. _.. .-.. .., .. _ .-•.. .. ._ .. - .. _ .. .. .. .. _ ._ _. .. 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10400 15001858 2400,9 5186 $0 -100.090 1 $118 50 -100.0% 51,225 5184 .22.2% n/4 85/8 n/a 5299 50 -100.0% 5262 5312 19.1% Medical OfficeCi01c greater than 14000 sf 140011 5186 50 -100.0% $118 50 -1005% 51,225 5414 423% n/a 0/4 n/a 5299 $0 -1000% 5262 5455 23.2% 911 Bank/Savings Wall -In 1,000 s5 5212 50 -100.0% $118 50 .100.0% 51,454 5552 41.7% n/4 No n/a 5341 50 .1000% 5299 5611 1043% 912 8ank/Sa99ngs 0rlve4n 140081 5174 50 -1000% 5118 $0 -1000% 51,191 5569 -52.216 n/4 n/4 n/a 5280 50 .100.02, 5245 $625 155.1% 710 General Office 1,00089 5153 SO -100090 594 50 .100.090 51,050 5250 .262% n/a n/a n/a 5246 50 .100090 5216 5274 26.9% 760 9,800,66 6, Dom opment Center 1400,9 531 SD -100.096 594 50 -1000% 5555 5212 .61.8%1 n/4 4/0 n/a 5130 50 .1000% 5114 5233 104.4% ..,... . _. .. .-_ ..., ..:.:-.K ....... _ -.. ._. -- - _, _. _ _ _, _ _.. _.._. 140 Manufacturing 140081 555 50 -100.0% 5236 50 -100011 5375 5125 46.2% Na n/a n/a 588 50 .1000% 577 5137 22.9% 150 Warehousing 1400 s1 $42 50 -100.016 $42 50 .5004% 1 5283 $20 45.2% Ne Me n/a 568 50 .100.0%' 559 577 303% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,00011 58 50 -100.0% 1 519 $0 .100011. $40 515 425% n/4 Ma n/a $13 50 -1000% 512 516 333% 152 Nigh-Cube(Automated) Warehouse 1,000 s1 $42 50 .100.0% 547 50 -1000% $288 535 .822% n/a n/a n/a 568 $0 .100.0% 559 538 -356% 110 General Ugh? Industrial 140011 575 50 -100.0% 5236 50 -100.0% 5512 5172 46.4% r/a n/a n/a 5120 50 •100.016 5105 5189 80.0% n/a Concrete Plant acre 5165 50 .100.025 5213 $0 -1000% 51,130 5387 .651% n/a n/1 Na 5265 SO .100094 5232 5425 83.2% n/a Sand Mining acre 521 50 .100.0% 5213 50 -100.0% I 5245 550 453% 0/a n/a n/a 534 50 -100.0% 530 555 83.3% c 820 Retail 1,000 stela 5312 50 .100.0% 5236 50 -100.0% 51,531 5592 .623% 0/8 n/a n/a 5503 50 400.0% 5441 5650 47.4% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel POS. 5188 50 .1000%. 539 $0 -1000% 5921 5477 48.2%9 9, n/a n/4 $303 50 .1000%' 5265 5523 92.4% 801 New/Used Auto Sala 1,00011 $186 50 .100.0% 5118 50 -1000% 5912 5367 .599% 994 Ma n/a 5300 50 -100.0%. 5263 5403 53.2% 932 Restaurant 1,000 11 5800 50 .1000%9 5330 50 .100.0% 53,923 51,693 -562% 0/4 0/4 0/1 52,289 50 .2000% 51,129 52,858 64.6% 934 Fast Food Rest w/orive-Thr,, 100011 5863 50 -1004% 5330 50 -1000%1 54,122 52,222 <2A% n/a n/4 n/a 52,389 $0 -200.0% 51,217 52,439 100.4% 850 Supermarket 1,00081 5222 $0 -1000%1 5424 50 -100.0% 51,087 5512 -52.9% Ma n/a n/a 5357 50 -100.0% 5313 5562 29.690 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 s1 570 50 .1004%' 520 $0 -100.0%1 5130 5374 129.1% 9/a n/a n/a 5107 $0 -100.0% 5114 5421 2603% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 5206 50 .1000% 577 50 -100.0% 51,009 5227 -283% 0/3 n/a Ma 5332 54 -2004% 5291 5238 -18.2% 853 Convenience Market with Gal Pumps 1,000 s1 5453 50 .1000%' 5424 50 -100.016 52,220 51,455 -35.9%' 0/e n/a n/a 5746 50 -200.0% 5653 51,598 144.2% 890 Furniture Sure 1,00011 535 SO .100016 5236 50 -100.0% 5170 557 463% NO n/a n/a $56 50 -100.0% 549 $63 28.6% _. ._..... R8C0S4fpNAL•a... .. - ....., r<i a... .. .. .. _ .. . _ . . .. _. .._.. . .... .... .... .... _ .a -.- ..- ---- ...,... 430 Golf Course hole 5267 50 .1000% 538 50 400.0% 51,307 5269 -29.4% n/a Ne Ma 5429 $0 -200.0% 3376 5296 .213% 492 Racquet Club/Nealth Club/Dance 5udl0 1,00051 5259 50 .1000% 5128 50 -1004% 51,270 5771 -393% n/a n/a n/a 5417 SO -10009$ $366 5842 132.4% 412 County Pah 18,8 512 50 .1004% 585 50 -100.0% $81 550 -383% n/a n/a n/a 527 50 -100.0% 523 555 139.2% 491 Tennis Court court 5253 50 .100.0% 518 $0 -100.016 51,241 5789 -360% n/a n/a n/a 5408 $0 -200.0% 5357 $866 142.6% 420 Marina boat berth 512 50 .100.0% $45 $0 .100.0% $82 547 42.7% 0/3 n/4 n/4 527 50 .200.0% 514 552 116.2% -_..r... GOVFRNMENTAU- ,_. .. ._>.. ._ _`- -...:... -.a.. .._ .. _... ._ .•. s.i .. . . . . .. » . ..,a.. . ,. ,_ - _ _ - - i. _ _ ... .„......,.,. _. ,..+,-,_.> ..,,..... , 232 Post Office 1400 sf 5194 50 .100.0%. 594 50 .100.0% 51,102 5405 431% 8/8 Ne n/a 5312 50 .1000% 5233 5444 62.6% 590 library 1400 s1 5188 50 .100015 594 50 .100.014 5919 5439 -52.2% n/a n/a n/a 5302 50 400.0% 5265 5482 81.9% 233 Government Office Comptes 1,00051 5148 50 .1004% 594 $0 .1000% Na n/a 85/8 0/a n/a 99. 5238 50 .100.0% $209 5381 823% 521 fall 644 n/a n/o /. 516 $0 -100.0% $466 5347 -253% Na 0/a n/. ' 5153 50 -100.0% 5134 $238 22.6% 84 - .., .� ... ...,., s., ... �... a. _ _ - �- .... ... ..._ ... -�.. ... .... .... w .� 565 Day Cam Center 1,00051 5110 50 .100.0% ' 5236 50 .100.0%' 5755 5222 -20.6% ' n/a n/a n/a 5177 $0 -100.0% 5155 5244 52.4% 610 9087112l 1,00051 5171 50 .180416 583 50 -1000% 5838 $342 .59.2%. 0/, 0/3 9/0 5275 $0 .100.0% 5241 5325 55.6% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf $128 50 -1004% 5213 50 .100.0%, 51,223 5634 48.2% n/a 0/3 n/8. 5287 $0 .100.0% 0251 $696 1223% 560 Church 1,000 s1 558 50 .100.096 ; 533 50 -100.016 5285 5127 -55.4% i 85/8 nta 7/a 594 50 -100.076 582 5140 20.296 444 Moyle Theater w/Madnee 44,990 5925 S0 .1000%! 5188 50 .100.0%! 54,535 51,493 42.1% n/a n/a n/a 52090 50 .100.0% ' 51,305 51,639 25.6% 520 Elementary School (Private, 8.5) student 510 $0 -100.09, 512 50 .1000%1 570 515 -28.6%, '/4 n/a n/a 517 50 .1000% 514 516 143% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student $10 50 -1000%1 512 50 -1000% 570 $18 -243% n/a n/a 0/4 517 50 .100.0% 514 $19 35.2% 530 Nigh School (Private, 9-12) student 513 50 .100096; 513 50 -100.096; 590 520 -229%' n/a n/a n/a 521 $0 .1000% 518 522 222% 540/550 Univenlry/hmlor College (7,500 or fewer students) student $11 $0 -100.0% 1 $13 $0 .1000% $28 525 42.9% 11/3 n/a n/4 513 00 -1000% $16 527 689% n/a 8185E23m 1,0D05f 569 50 -1000% 594 50 -1000%' 5339 5157 -53.2%'' n/a Na n/a n/a n/a Ma 597 5123 28.4% 'For Educa00 al Facilities Impact Foe, the Single Family (detached) rate should also be used l r'Single Fa M1 Attached/Townhouse' residential land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 J-1 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 1-1 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth Fee; Unincorporated County Parks & Recreation ITE LUC Land the Unit 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change RESIDENTIAL. Transportation 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rte Growth Change Educational Fadlltles• 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rale Growth Change Administrative Fee (2.5%) 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Total (All Fees) 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change 210 Single Family (detached) •1ess than 1000 51 du 51,302 51,560 19.8% 52,974 53,149 5.9% 51,756 51,702 •3.196 $183 5201 98% 57,519 58,258 9856 -1000 10149955 du 51302 $1,684 29.3% 52,974 53,554 195%1 51,756 51,702 -3.1% $183 5218 19.196 57,519 58,929 18.7% -1,500 to 2,499 sf du 51,463 51,791 22.49 54 483 54,248 -5.296 51,756 51,702 -3.1% 5229 $241 5.2% . 59,388 59,864 5.1% • 2,500 sf or larger du 51,587 51,991 25.596 55,031 55,004 -0596 51,756 $1,702 -3.196 5249 5270 8.496 510,195 511,066 8.596 220 Multi-Fa4ly/040essary unit du 5884 51,022 15.696 52,428 52,742 12.9% 5500 5668 33.7% 5117 $138 17.9% 54,816 55,638 17.1% 240 Mobile Horne/RV(tied doom) du 5942 5999 6.1% 51,745 51,550 -11.2% 5623 51,026 64.7% 0109 5118 8.396 54,455 54,857 9.0% TRANSIENT ASSISTED GROUP: 310 Hotel 1.00111 n/a n/4 Na 52,804 5970 -65.496 n/a Na Na 586 533 -61.69 ' 53,539 51,343 -62.1% 320 MotelMOT n/a n/a n/4 51,516 $686 -54.7% n/a Na n/a $54 525 -53.7% 52,219 51,025 -538% 620 Nursing Home bed n/a n/o n/a $432 5222 48.6% n/a n/a n/a $30 518 40.0% 51,237 5722 -41.696 252 Assisted Care thing Facility (ACIF) bed n/4 n/a n/a 5620 5250 -59.79 n/a n/a Na 536 518 -50.0% $1,460 5750 48.6% OFFICE & FINANCIAL. - - - ._ 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,00051 n/a n/a n/a 513,411 54,321 -67.8% n/a Na n/a 5389 5123 -68.4% 515,940 55,040 •689% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 s1 Na n/a n/a $13,411 56,298 -53.0% Na n/8 n/a $389 5179 54.0% 515,940 57,346 -53.9% 911 Etank/Savings Walk-in 1,000 s1 Na n/a Na 510,634 54,730 -55.59 n/a Na n/a $326 5147 54.9% 513,384 55,045 -548% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 s1 Na n/4 n/a 513,020 56,219 -52.296 n/a Na n/a 5376 5185 -50.896 515,404 57,398 •50.796 710 General Office 1,00051 Na n/a n/a 53,798 51,916 -49.6% n/a n/a n/a $139 561 -56.1% 55,696 52,501 -56.1% 760 Research& Development Center 1,000 s1 n/4 n/a n/a 52,798 51,424 49.1% 6 n/a 0/a n/a 594 547 -50.09 53,866 51,916 -50.4% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,00051 0/a Na Na 51,318 5663 -49.7% Na Na n/a 554 523 -57.4% 52,203 5948 •57.096 150 Warehousing 1,00051 n/4 n/o Na $1,228 5617 498% n/o n/a n/4 $43 519 -55.896 51,775 $783 -559% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000 s/ Na n/a n/a 5862 $217 .748% n/a n/a n/a 524 56 -75.09 5978 5254 -74.0% 152 High-Cube(Automated) Warehouse 1,000 s1 Na Na N4 51,228 $295 -76.0% n/a Na Na 543 59 -79.1% 51,775 5377 -788% 110 General Ught industrial 1,000 sf n/a n/a Na 52,404 51,206 498% n/a Na n/a $86 539 -54.7% 53,538 51,606 -54.6% n/a Concrete Plans Me n/a n/a n/a $5,382 52,703 49.896 n/4 n/a n/4 5185 588 -52.4% $7,572 53,603 -52.4% n/a 5460 Mining acre n/a n/a n/a $690 5346 49.9% Na n/a Na 528 $11 -60.7% 51,161 5462 -60.2% RETAIL:__ - __ _ _ _ - " _ _ _- - _ _ _.T _ _ 820 Real? 1,000sfgfa n/a n/a n/a $3,163 52,862 -9.59 0/4 Ne Na 5155 5103 •3359 56,341 54,207 -33.79 944/946 Ga sol Ino/Service Radon with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. n/a n/a Na 55,587 52,287 -59.1% Na n/a Na 5183 $82 -55.2% 57,486 53,369 -55.09 841 New/Used Auto Saks 1,00051 n/a n/a n/a $10,108 53,732 -63.19 n/a n/a n/a 5297 5113 -62.091 512,184 54,615 -62.1% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sf 0/2 Na Na 522,152 59,289 -58.1% n/4 Na n/4 5741 5321 -56.79 530 364 513,161 -56.7% 934 Fast Food Restw/Drive-Thru 1,000 s1 n/a n/4 n/a 534,781 $20,459 41.2% n/a n/a Na 51,070 5628 413% 543,877 525,748 41396 850 Supermarket 1900 sf n/a n/a n/a 511,179 54,066 -63.6% n/a n/a n/a 5340 5129 -62.1% 513,922 55,269 -62.2% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 s! n/a Na n/a $7,830 52,934 -62.5% n/a n/a n/a 5207 $93 -55.19 58,482 53,812 -55.19 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay n/a Na n/a 514,589 52,209 -84.996 n/a n/a n/a 5413 $67 43.8% 516,917 $2,731 -83.9% 853 Convenience Marketwlth Gas Pumps 1,000 sf n/a Na n/a $25,430 $30,463 -5899 n/a n/a n/a 5750 5338 -54.9% 530,736 513,854 94.9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000,5 n/a Na n/a $1,373 5615 -55.2% n/a n/a n/a $48 $18 -625% 51,967 5753 41.7% RECREATIONAL: '-' .- 430 Golf Course hole n/a n/a n/a 511,248 57,882 -299% n/a n/a n/a 5342 $211 -383% 514,007 $8,658 •38.2% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 510,824 55,835 46.1% n/4 n/a n/a 5331 5186 438% 513,585 67,639 438% 412 County Park acre n/a n/a n/a 5718 5387 46.1% Na n/a n/a 524 512 -50.0% 5975 5504 483% 491 Tennis Court court n/4 n/a n/o 512,180 56,856 43.796 n/a n/a n/a 5361 5213 41.0% 514,818 58,724 41.1% 420 Marina boat berth n/8 n/a n/a 5973 5654 -32.8% n/a n/a n/a 529 519 -345% 51,197 5772 -35.5% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 P055015550 1,000 sf n/a n/4 n/a $14,199 57,136 49.796 Na Na Na 5404 5200 -505% 516,583 58,185 -50.6% 590 Ubrary 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 517,925 $11,712 -34.7% n/a n/a n/a 5492 5316 -358% $20,185 512,949 -35.8% 733 Government Office Complex 1,0005( n/a n/a n/a 59,632 $4,842 49.7% n/4 n/a n/a 5258 5131 49.2% 510,579 55,354 49.496 571 Jail bed Na Na Na $389 5949 144.096 n/a Ne n/4 529 538 31.09 51,187 51,572 32.496 M?SCEILANEOU0I 565 Day Care Canter 1,0005! n/a Na n/a 58,847 53,582 -595% n/a n/a n/a 5257 5101 40.79 510,537 54,149 -60.6% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf n/a Na n/a 55,309 52,498 •52.99 n/a n/a n/4 5173 580 -53.8% 57,090 53,295 -535% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf n/a Na n/a $3,511 $6,962 98.3% n/a n/a n/a 5139 5207 48.996 55,707 58999 48.9% 560 Church 19005! n/o n/a n/a 52,588 51,154 -55.4% n/a n/a n/a 579 536 -54.496 53,219 51,457 -54.7% 444 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen n/o Na Na 522,743 57,096 48.8% n/a n/8 Na 5780 5256 47.29 531,966 510,484 -67.2% 520 Elementary School (Private, K-5) student n/a n/a n/a 5149 5164 10.1% n/a n/a n/a 57 $5 -28.6% 5279 5200 -283% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student n/a n/a Na 5149 $225 51.0% No n/a Na 57 $7 0.096 $279 5269 -3.6% 530 High 5choot (Private, 9-12) student n/a Na Na 5538 5237 -55.9% n/a n/8 n/a 517 57 -58.896 5710 5286 •59.79 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student n/a n/a n/a 5653 5443 -32.2% n/a n/4 n/a 520 512 40.09 5809 $507 -373% Na Fire station 1,00051 n/a Na n/2 5983 $324 479% n/4 Na Na 540 516 .60.056 51,622 5670 -58.7% 'For Educational Facilities impact Fee, the Single Family (detached) rate should also be used for"Single FoWI Attached/Townhousereslden 181 land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 1-2 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 1-2 Master Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth Fee; City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, City of Sebastian, City of Vero Beach HE LUC land the Correctional Faculties Unit 2009 Affordable Percent I Adopted Rate Growth Change i Solid Waste ',cinder 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change I Public Building. 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rale Growth Change libraries 2009 Affordable Percent Ad00ted Rate Growth Change Emergency Services 2009 Affordable Percent Adapted Rale Growth Change Transportation 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change 210 Single Family(detached) . • Less than 1000 41 du 5151 $0 -1000* 575 $0 -100.0% 5183 5648 254.1% 5430 5587 36.5% 5207 530 -87.9% 52,974 53,149 5.9% .1,000 19 149901 du 5151 $0 -1000% 575 $0 -1000% 5183 $696 2803% 5430 5631 46.7%, 5247 533 .86.6% 52,974 53,554 193% - 1,500 to 2,49910 du 5170 50 -1000% 575 50 -1000% 5206 5739 258.7% 5483 5672 39.1% 5278 535 47.4% $4,483 54,248 .5.2% - 2,50010 or larger du 0184 50 -100.0% 575 50 -100.0% $223 $826 270.4% 5524 5750 43.1% 5301 533 -87.4% 55,031 55,004 -05% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du $100 50 -100.0% 557 50 -100.0% 0121 5418 2453% 5285 $381 • 33.7% 5176 $20 48.614 52,028 $2,742 12.9% 240 Mobile Non /RV flied down) du 5123 $0 -100016 $75 50 .100.0% 5149 5070 2154% 5349 $428 22.6% $182 522 47.9% $1,245 51,550 -11.2% _ ___...... l4ANS1ENT, AS501ID, GROUP:.. •�., .- _. --. s 310 Hotel room 099 50 -100016 $21 00 -100.0% $229 5162 -29.3% n/a n/1 n/8 5160 50 -100.0% 52,800 5970 -654% 320 Motelr 599 50 -1000% 521 50 -1000% 5129 5150 .345% n/a Na 7/3 5160 50 •1000% 01516 5686 -54.7% 620 'tuning Nome bed 5107 50 .100.0% $33 50 .100.0% $312 5230 -263% n/6 Na n/a 5172 SD -1000% $432 3222 48.6% 252 Assisted Care Uving Facility(ACLF) bed $107 $0 -1000% $62 50 -1000% $312 5230 -263% n/. n/a 9/3 5172 $0 -100.0% 5620 5250 49.7% ...... ._-...---.. «. .. .. .- -. .- ._ _ _. .--- 720 meal..? Office/Clinic 10,000.1«less 1,0000I 5186 $0 .100.0% 5118 50 -100.0% 51,275 5284 -77.7% Na 49/80/1 5299 50 -100,0% 513,011 54,321 -67.8% Medical 00 ee/oleic greater Nan 10,00051 1000 sI 5186 50 .100.0* 5118 55 .1000% 51,275 5414 473% n/a Na n/0 $299 $0 -100.0% 513,411 56,293 .53.0% 911 Bank/Savings W313.19 1000,! 5212 50 -100.0% 5118 50 -1000% 51,454 5557 41.7% 7/3 n/o n/a 5341 50 -1000% 510,634 54,730 -553% 912 6471154v1n91 DNve-In 1000,! 5174 50 -1000% ' 5110 50 -100.0% 51,191 5569 -52.2% 996 n/a n/a 5280 50 -1000% 513020 $6,219 425% 710 General Office 1,0D0,f 5153 50 -1000% 594 $0 -100.0% 51,050 5250 .76.2% Na n/a n/a 5246 50 -100.0% $3,798 51,916 49.6% 760 Research & Development Center 5,000 sI 501 50 -1000% 594 50 -1000% $555 5212 418* N8 Na n/a 5130 $0 -1000% 52,798 51,024 49.1% v.. �.rr--_.I 84237 WL•. •.. ... __._, .. _....__-. ..,ay..-. --.._ ._ ..--.w...m ' 4 _ _ - Y r.. -. -- s s0 - -. - �.e .._.... �. ... «. 140 Manufacturing 10 00,1 555 50 -10% 00 5236 50� -100.0% 5375 5125 46.7% n/a No 0/1 588 50 -1000% 51,313 5663 49.7% 150 Warehousing 1,000 sI 942 50 -1000% 547 50 -1000% 5288 570 -75.7% n/a Mo n/a 568 $0 .1000% 51,228 5617 498% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,0001! 58 50 -1000% $19 50 -1000% 540 515 423% n/3 n/a n/a 513 50 -100.0% 5062 5217 .74.8% 152 MRh-Cobe(Automated)Wa rehouse 1,000 s? 502 SO -1000% $47 50 -1000% 5288 $35 -878% 7/1 n/1 n/1 568 50 -1000% 51,228 5295 -760% 110 General Ugh? Industrial 1,000,1 575 50 -100.0% 5236 $0 -1000% 0512 5172 46.4% n/a n/a 7/3 $120 50 .100.0% 52,404 $1,206 49.3% Na Concrete Pla et iefe 5165 50 -1000% 5213 50 .100008 51,130 5387 458% n/1 n/a Na 5265 $0 .1000% 55,382 52,703 498% n/a Sand Mining acre $21 $0 -1000% $213 50 -100.0% 0145 550 453% n/a n/8 n/a $34 50 -100.0% 5690 5346 49.9% RETAIL:. - _ - - - _,. .. ., r .4 < - - - - .. -_ - -' - _. _ - .- _ _ . 620 Retail 1000 stela $312 SO -1000% $236 50 -100.0% 51,531 5592 413% Na Ne Na 5503 SD -100.0% 53,163 52,862 -93% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 5180 $0 -1000% $39 50 -100.0% 5921 5477 48.2% n/a n/a n/a $303 50 -1000% 55,587 51,287 .59.1% 841 6e00/0830Auto Sales 10003? 5186 50 .100.0% 5113 SO .100.0% 5912 5367 -598% 9/8 Na n/0 5300 50 .0000% 510,108 53,732 43.1% 932 Restaurant 1,0003? 5800 $0 .1000% 5330 50 .100.0% $3,923 $1,693 -568% n/a n/a n/a 51,289 $0 .1000% 522,152 59,289 -58.1% 930 Fast Food Rest. we/Drive-Thus 1,000 31 $863 50 -100.0% 5330 50 -100.0% $0,227 $2,222 47.4% n/3 Na n/e 51,389 50 .1000% 534,781 520,459 41.2% 850 Supermarket 1,000 s1 5222 50 -100.0% 1 5424 50 -100.0% 51,047 5512 .62.9% . n/a n/a n/a 5357 50 -100.014 511,179 54,066 43.6% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1000 s1 $70 50 -1000% 520 $0 -100.0% 5134 5374 179.1% n/0 n/a n/a' 5107 50 -100.0% 57,330 52,934 423% 947 Self.5mlce Car Wash smite bay 5206 50 -1000% 377 50 -100A% 51,009 5217 -783% n/3 I/O n/a 5332 $0 -1000% 514,589 $2,209 44.54 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,00031 5463 50 -100.0% 5024 50 -100.0% $2,270 51,455 -35.9% Na Na n/a 5746 $0 -1000% 525,430 510,463 .56.9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 31 535 50 -100.0% 5236 $0 -100.0% 5170 $57 463% Ne Ne Na $56 50 -1000% 51,373 $615 -55.2% _-�......._-. . .,. . .; . .. . ... . .- .... . . -, - _. -.... .. -. .-_.•- - ---_ 430 Golf Course hole $267 50 -100.0% 530 $0 -100.0% 51,307 $269 -79.4% n/a n/o n/a $429 50 .1000% 511,248 57,882 -29.9% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,00001 5259 00 -100.0% 0118 $0 -1000% 51,270 5771 -393% n/a I/O n/3 5417 50 -1000% 510,824 55,835 46.1% 412 County Park acre 517 $0 -100.0% $85 50 -100.0% 591 $50 -383X' n/a N4 7/4 522 SO -1000% 5718 5387 46.1% 491 Tennis Court court 5253 50 -100.0% 518 50 -100.0% 51,241 5789 .360% n/a n/4 9/3 5408 50 -1000% 512,180 56256 43.7% 420 Marina boat berth 517 $0 -100.0%' 545 50 -100.0%' 532 547 42.7% n/a Na n/8 527 $0 -100.0% 5973 5654 -328% - -GOVERNMENTAL: .. . ... ... .. ..,-. 1 0 ..= . 732 Post Office 100011 5194 $0 -100.0% 594 $0 -100.0% 51,107 5405 430%' Na Ma Na 5312 $O -100.0% 514,199 57,136 49.7% 590 Library 100031 5189 50 -1000% 594 50 .100.0% 5919 5439 -522% n/a 2/3 n/a ' 5302 50 4000% 517,925 511,712 .36.7% 733 GovernmentOl1ce Consoles 100011 5148 50 -100.016 594 50 -1000% N3 Ne n/a n/a n/a Na 5238 SO -100.0% 59,632 54,802 49.7% 571 1311 bed n/3 Na Na 516 50 -100.0% $466 5347 .253% n/a n/a n/a 5153 50 -1000% 3389 5949 144.0% -. - .. MDCELIANCOUS: .. __ _ _ _ _ .._ ... _ .. .-. _ -. _ _. - . . _ . . -_ ._.- ,..-. ..._. s_. - ......---........ --,- 565 Day CareCenter 1,000,1 5110 50 -100.0% $236 50 -1000% 5755 5222 -70.6%' Na Na Na 0177 50 -100.0% 58,847 53,502 -593% 610 Hasp!01 100031 5171 50 -100,014 $83 50 -100.0% 5838 5342 .59.2% Na Na Na 5275 50 -100.0% 55,309 52,498 -52.9% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,00031 5178 SD -100.0%' $110 50 -100.0% 51,223 5634 48.2% n/a n/0 Na 5187 $0 -100.0% 53,511 56,962 983% 560 Church 1,000 31 $58 $0 -100.0%1 533 50 -100.0%' 5285 5127 -550% n/4 n/1 n/0' 594 50 -100014 52,588 01,154 -55.4% 444 Movie Theater w/Matinee Sereell 5925 50 -100.0% 5188 50 -1000%i 54,535 51,493 47.1%. Na n/a N8, 51,490 50 -100.0% 522,743 57,096 48.8% 520 Elementary 106001 (Private, 6.5) student 510 SO -100.0% , $12 $0 -100 0% ' 570 515 -78.6% , 0/3 No n/a ' 517 50 -1000% 5149 3164 10.1% 522 Middle khool(00104e, 6.9) student 510 50 -100.0%1 512 50 -1000% 570 518 44.3% Na Na n/a' $17 50 -100.0% 5149 1225 510% 530 Nigh School (Private, 9.12) student 513 $0 -100D%I 513 $0 -100,016• 590 520 -778%. Na N3 N4 521 50 400.0% 5538 5237 -55.9% 540/550 Univenler/lunlor College (7,500 or fewer students) student 511 $0 -1000% 513 50 -100.0%' 578 $25 47.9% Na Ma Na 518 50 -100.0% 5653 $443 -32.2% n/a Flre Sta0on 1,00010 569 50 -100.0% 594 50 -100.0% 5339 5157 .53.7%! Na n/a Na Na Na n/3 5983 5324 47.0% 'For Fduca d0 al Facilities Impact fee.theSingie Family {detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Famll./Attached/Tomhoose• residential land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 J-3 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table 1-2 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth Fee; City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, City of Sebastian, City of Vero Beach Educational Facilities' ITE IUC Land 1110 Unit 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change 00890008960. City Admin Fee (2.0961 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change County Admin. fee (1.0%) 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Total (All Fees) 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change 21D Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 51,756 51,702 -3.1% 5116 5122 5.2% 558 561 5.296 55990 56,299 5.2% - 1,00050 1,499 sf du 51,756 51,702 -3.196 5116 5132 13996 $58 $66 13.8% 55,990 56,814 13.7% - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 51,756 51,702 -3.196 5149 5148 4.79 575 574 -1396 57,675 57,618 -0.7% - 2,500 sf or larger du 51,756 51,702 -3.196 5162 3166 2.596 581 583 2.5% 58,337 58,569 2.8% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du $500 $668 33.7% 573 385 16.4% 537 542 13596 03,777 54,356 15.3% 240 Mobile Home/RV(tied down) du $623 51,026 64.7% 565 $70 7.7% $32 535 9.4% 53,343 53,601 7.7% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel room n/a n/a n/a 566 523 -65.2% $33 511 -66.79 03,412 51,166 -65996 320 Motel room n/a n/a n/a 541 $17 -585% 520 $8 40.09 52,086 $861 -58.7% 620 Nursing Home bed n/4 n/a n/a 521 $9 57.1% $11 $5 -545% 51,088 5466 -57.2% 252 Assisted Care Hying Facility (ACIF) bed n/a n/a n/a $25 010 -600% 513 55 -61.576 51,311 5495 -62.2% OFFICE& FINANCIAL. - --'- - -' - - - 720 Medical Office/CllnIc 10,000 s/or less 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5306 $92 499% 5153 546 49.99 515,748 54,743 -69.9% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5306 $134 -56.2% 5153 567 -56.2% 515,748 56,913 46.1% 911 Bank/Savings Walk•In 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5255 5106 -58.4% $128 553 -58.696 513,142 55,446 -58.6% 912 Bank/Sayings Drive -In 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5296 $136 -54.1% 5148 568 -54.1% 515,227 56,992 -54.1% 710 General Office 1,000 s1 N. n/a n/a 5107 543 -599% 553 522 58.59 55,501 $2,231 -59.4% 760 Research & Development Center 1,00011 n/a n/a n/a 573 $33 -549% 537 $16 -56.8% 53,768 51,685 .55.39 0DIKTRI40. - - - - 140 ManafacturinR 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 541 516 -61096 521 58 •61.9% 52,134 5812 -61.9% 150 Warehousing 1,0001( n/a n/a n/a 533 $14 -57.6% $17 $7 -58.89 51,723 5708 -58.9% 151 Mini.Warchnuse 1,000 sf n/o Na n/a 519 55 -73.7% 59 52 -77.89 5970 5239 -75.49 152 High-Cube(Automated) Warehouse 1,000 sf n/a n/a Na 533 57 -782% 517 $3 -82.49 51,723 5340 -80.3% 110 General 0 ght Industrial 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 567 528 -58.2% $33 514 -57.69 53,447 $1,420 -58.8% n/a Concrete Plant MC n/a n/a n/a 5143 562 .56.6% 572 531 •565% 57,370 53,183 -56.8% n/a Sand Mining acre n/a n/a n/a 522 $8 -63.6% $11 $4 -63.69 51,136 5408 -64.1% RETAIL: -- - - - 82D Retail 1,000,5816 n/a n/a n/a $115 569 -00.016 057 535 -38.6% 55,917 53,558 -39.9% 944/946 Gasoil ne/Servlce Stationwith or w/o Car Wash fuel Pos. n/a n/a n/a 5141 555 -61096 $70 528 -60096 57,249 52,847 40.7% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5232 582 -64.7% 5116 $41 24.79 511,972 54,222 -64.7% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a $570 $220 -61A% 5285 5110 -61.4% 529,349 511,312 -61.5% 934 Fast Food Rest w/OriveAhru 1,00011 n/a n/a n/a 5832 5454 -45,496 5416 $227 -45.4% 542,838 $23,362 -45.55i 850 Supermarket 1,00011 n/a n/a n/a 5265 592 -653% 5133 546 -65.4% 513,667 54,716 -65.5% 942 Automobile Regal r/80dy shop 1,00051 n/a n/a n/a 5163 $66 -593% $82 533 -59.8% 58,406 53,407 -59.5% 947 Self -Service Car Washs ervice bay n/a n/a n/a 5324 549 -84.9% 5162 524 -85396 516,699 52,499 -85.0% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sl n/a n/a n/a 5587 5238 •593% 5293 5119 .59.496 530,213 512,275 -59.4% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 s1 N. n/a n/a 537 $13 -64.9% $19 57 -63.2% 51,926 5692 -64.1% RECREATIONAL:430 Golf Course hale n/a n/a n/a 0266 5163 -38.7% 5133 582 -38.3% 513,688 08,396 •38.7% 492 Racquet Cl ub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a 5258 5132 -489% 5129 566 -08996 513,275 56,804 -08.7% 412 County Park acre n/a n/a n/a 519 59 -52.6% 59 54 -55.6% 5956 $450 -52.9% 491 Tennis Court court n/a n/a n/a 5282 5153 -05.7% $141 576 -46.1% 514,523 57,874 -45.8% 420 Marina boat berth n/a n/a n/a 523 514 -39.1% 511 $7 -36.49 51,178 5722 -38.7% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a $318 5151 -525% 5159 575 -529% 516,383 $7,767 -52.6% 690 Ubrary 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5389 5243 -375% 5194 $122 -37.1% 520,011 512,516 -37.5% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/4 5202 597 -520% 5101 548 -5259 510,415 54,987 -52.1% 571 fell bed n/a n/a n/a $20 526 30.0% 510 513 30.0% 51,054 51,335 26.796 -- MISCELLANEOUS: - -- _ 565 Day Care Center 1,00051 n/a n/a n/a $203 576 -62.6% $101 538 -62.4% 510,429 53,918 -62.4% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf n/e n/a n/a $134 557 -573% 567 528 58.2% 56,877 52,925 -57.596 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5106 5152 43.496 553 576 43.496 55,476 57,824 42.996 560 Church 1,000 sf N. n/a n/a 061 526 -57.4% 531 513 -58.19 53,150 51,320 -58.1% 444 Moyle Theaterw/Matinee screen Na Na 0/6 $598 5172 -71.2% 5299 586 -71.2% 530,778 58,847 -71.3% 620 Elementary School (Private, 5-5) student n/a n/a n/a $5 54 -200% 53 $2 -33396 $266 5185 -30.5% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student n/a n/a n/a 55 55 0.0% 53 $2 233% $266 $250 .6.096 530 Nigh School (Private, 9-12) student n/a n/a n/a 514 55 -643% 57 53 -57.1% 5696 5265 -61.9% 540/550 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student n/a n/a n/a 515 $9 -40096 58 55 -373% $796 $482 29.4% n/a Fire Station 1,00051 n/a n/a n/a 530 510 -66.7% 515 55 .66.7% 51,530 5496 -67.6% 'For Educatio al Facilities Impact Fee, the Single Family (detached) rate should also be used f r'Single Famll Attached/Townhouseresidential land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 J-4 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study - Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table J-3 Master Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth Fee; Town of Indian River Shores Correctional facilities ITC LUC Land the Unit 2009 Affordable Per<ent Adopted Rate Growth Change --•000CN2ML. a-- .,._....__.• . . . . Solid Waste facilities 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate .Growth Change . .- .. Public Buildings 2009 Affordable Percent 0000104 Rate Growth Change - libraries 2009 Affordable percent Adopted Rate Growth Change , Transportation 2009 AHerdable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change -.... -. _ Cdumllonal Facilities' 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change ., 210 - Single Family (detached) - Ins than 1,000 s1 du 5151 50 -100.016 575 $0 -100,096 5183 5648 254.1% 5430 5587 36.5% 32,974 53.149 6.9% 51,756 51,702 .3.1% 1,000 t91,4996f du $151 50 -100,016 575 50 -100,019 5183 $696 2803% 5430 $631 46.7% 52,974 53554 19519 31,756 51,702 -3.1% - 1500 to 2,499 sf du 5170 50 -100A% 575 50 -100,019 5206 5739 258.714 5483 5672 39.1% 54,483 54,248 .5.2% 51,756 51,702 -3.1% - 2,500170r13 rger du 5184 $0 .100.0% 575 $0 -100.0% 5223 $826 270.4% 3524 5750 43.1% 55,031 55,004 -0519 51,756 31,702 -3.1% 220 Mul5i-029ily/000es05r9 Unit du 5100 50 .1000% 557 50 -100.0%. 5121 5418 2453% 5285 5381 33.7% 52.028 $2,742 12.9% 5500 5668 33.7% 240 Mobile Hos /RV Med down( du 5123 SD .100,016 575 50 -100.0%1 5149 5470 215.4% 3349 5428 22.6% 51,745 51,550 .11.2% 5623 51,026 64.7% ,. -w l04N1ffNT, A0567FD, G00UP:. - -room - - . 310 Hotel 599 50 .100.0% 521 50 -1000% - $229 5162 .29.3% 0/. 9/2 n/a 52,804 5970 45.4% n/1 N. N. 320 Motelroom 599 50 .1000% 521 50 -100.0% 5229 $150 -343% n/a n/a 0/1 51,516 5686 -54.7% n/a 9/3 n/, 620 Nursing Homq bed 5107 30 .100.0% 533 $0 .1000% 5312 5230 -26.3% n/a 0/a Na $432 5222 48.6% n/a n/a n/a 252 Assisted Care Uvl nq Facility (ACV) bed 3107 50 .1000% $62 50 -1000% 5312 5230 .263% Na 9/3 Na $620_ 5250 .59.7% n/a 9/3 11/3 )20 Medical Office/Oink 10000 s1 or less 10005f 5186 50 .1000% 5118 $D -100.0%, 31,275 5267 -77.7% n/1 0/3 n/a 513,011 54,321 478% n/1 n/a n/2 Med1031 Office/Clinic greater than 10000 sf 1000 s1 5186 $0 -100.016 5118 50 .100.0% 51175 5414 .675% 9/3 9/3 n/8 513,411 36,298 -53.0% 7/2 n/a n/3 911 Bank/Savings Wall -In 100051 5212 50 .100.0% 5118 SO -1000% 51,454 5557 -61.7% Na n/a n/a 310,634 $4,730 .553% 0/3 n/a 9/3 912 8296/SayIngs Orivein 1000 sf 3174 50 .1000% 5113 50 -1000% 51,191 5569 -52.2% n/a 9/a n/a 513.020 56,219 -52.2% 9/3 n/3 n/4 710 General Office 1000 sf 5153 $0 -1000% 594 50 .1000% 51,050 5250 -752% N3 Na Na 53,798 51,916 49.6% n/a n/a n/a 760 Research & Demlopment Center 1000 s1 531 SO -1000% 594 50 -100.0% 5555 $212 412%, 9/2 n/2 n/a 52,798 51,424 49.1% n/a 9/3 n/3 _ _ �. _.. .c. .�._.. ., .._- .. _ .... -. 140 Manufacturing 1,000 s1 555 50 -1000% 5236 50 .1000%1 3375 3125 46.7% n/a n/a n/1 51,318 5663 49.7% n/2 n/a n/a 150 Warehousing 1,0005f 542 50 -1000% $47 50 .1000% 5238 $70 -75.7% 9/, Na n/0 - 51,223 3617 498% n/a n/1 n/3 151 Minl-Wareh0use 10002f 58 50 -1000% 519 50 .100.0% 540 515 -623% n/a Na n/a 3862 $217 -74.3% n/, n/a 9/a 152 High-Cube(Automated( Warehouse 1,000 sf $42 50 -100.0% 547 50 .1000% 5283 535 .378% Na Na N. 51,223 5295 -76.0% n/, Ne 9/a 110 General Ughtlndustial 1000 s1 575 50 -100.0% 5236 30 .100.0% 5512 3172 -66.4% 9/3 n/a n/a 52,404 91,206 498% n/1 n/1 9/3 Na Concrete Plant aCle 5165 50 .1000% 5213 $0 -100.0% 51,130 5387 458% n/a n/a n/a 55,382 52,703 492% 7/3 n/a Na N. 5a nd Mlninq ame 521 50 -1000% 5213 53 .100016' 5145 $50 -653%' n/a Na n/a 5690 5346 29.9% n/a n/a n/a 620 Retail 1000 sigh 5312 $0 -1000% 5236 $0 .100.0%, 31,531 5592 413% Na Na n/a 53,163 52,862 .93% n/a n/a 9/3 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/0 Car Wash fuel pos. 5188 $0 -100.0% $39 50 .100.0% 5921 3477 48.2% Na Na n/a 55,587 52,287 -59.1% n/a n/a Na 841 Hew/Used Auto Sales 10002f 5186 50 400.0% $118 $D .1000%' 5912 3367 .592% Ne 9/3 n/a 510,108 53,732 43.1% 1 n/a Ne n/4 932 Restaurant 1,000sf 3800 SO .100.0% 5330 50 .100.0%1 53,923 51,693 -562% No 9/a n/a $22,152 59,289 -56.1% n/a n/a Na 934 fast Food Resew/Drive-TMu 1,000 sf 5863 50 -1000% 5330 50 .100.0%, 54,227 32,222 47.4%' No Na Na 534,781 520,459 411% n/a n/4 n/4 650 Supermertet 1,000 s1 5222 50 -1000% $424 50 .100.0% 51,087 5512 -52.9% 9/0 9/3 Na' 511,179 54,066 43.6% 9/1 9/1 n/4 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1000 sf 370 S0 -1000% 320 50 .100.0% 5134 5374 179.1% . n/a n/a N. 57,830 52,934 423% n/a n/a Na 947 Seif-5mice Car Wash smite bay 3206 50 -100-0% 577 50 -100.0%' 51,009 5217 -783% n/7 N. Na 304,569 $2,209 -84.9% n/a n/a 9/3 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,0008? 5463 50 -1000% 5424 50 -100.0% 32,270 51,455 -35.9% Na Na Na 525,230 $10,463 -56.9% 9/3 Na n/a 690 Furn' lure Store 1,000 sf $35 50 -100.0% 3236 $0 .100.0% 5170 557 .663% Na Nn 9/3 31,373 5615 -55.2% 9/4 Na n/. _ a. ... �. RFfRFAFR)NAL:.-.m.. • - ♦` ' - -v- _ - _ . e ._ +. ..-.•_- . ..' . . - - - - - . . 3. .. ..........,... -. - 430 Goll Course hole 3267 50 -100 0% 538 30 -1000% . 51,307 $269 -79.4%' n/0 Ne 9/4 . 511,248 57,832 -29.9% n/a 9/3 n/4 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1000 sf $259 S0 -1000% 5116 50 .100.0% 51,170 5771 -393% n/a n/a n/1 510,824 55,835 46.1% 9/0 n/a Na 412 County Park acre 517 50 -1000% 585 $0 .100.0% $81 550 -383% n/. Na n/a 5718 5387 46.1% n/a n/a n/a 491 Tennis Court court 5253 50 -100.0% 518 $0 .100.014 51,201 5789 -36.4% Na Na 9/2 312,180 56,856 43.7% n/a Na a/1 420 Marina boat berth 317 50 -1000% 545 50 -1000% 1 582 587 42.7%' 0/o 3/3 n/8 5973 5654 -328% 9/3 n/a n/a .. .-.._•:.. __. .., - ..-. .. s:.' _ __ -.... %...«. ,• « -,- ro..- ex�- 732 73 Post Office 10002f 5194 50 -100.0% 594 $0 -100.0% 51,107 5405 430% n/, n/a n/a . 514,199 57,136 492% Ma 9/, Na 590 Ubrary 1,000 s1 5180 $0 .10001, 594 50 -1000% 5919 5439 -52.1% a/a Na n/a 517,925 $11,712 -34.7%1 Na n/a 2/a 733 Government 0fflce Complex 1000 sf 5148 50 .1000% 594 50 -100.0%' Na 9/3 We 9/a We n/0 39,632 $4,842 497% n/3 n/1 Na 571 Jail bed n/2 Na n/3 516 50 .100.0% 1 5466 $347 -255% Ne Na n/a 5389 5949 144.0% Na Na n/. .,a.•.. «W M7CC1LANCOIIS:_ __ ..--- .. - _ _.... ,. _,...- .._ ... .. - --- .....- .. _,, _. �_-. ., .... ... «... .. r. ..,ca.,. .... �.�... .. �..a,.. 56S Day Care Center 1000 s1 $110 50 -100.0% 3236 50 .1000% 5755 5212 -70.6%I Ne Na n/1' 36,847 53,582 -595%' n/a n/a 0/3 610 Hospital 1,000 sf 3171 50 -1000% 583 50 -100.016 I 5338 5342 -592%' 9/0 n/a n/0 55,309 52,498 -52.9% I a/4 Me n/a 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 5173 50 -1000% 5113 $0 -100.0* 51,223 $634 463% Na N3 n/a 53,511 56,962 983%' n/a Na Na 560 Church 100051 $58 $0 -900.0% 533 $0 -1000%1 5285 5127 -55A%' n/8 M3 n/a 52.588 51,154 -55.4%' 9/, n/a n/a 044 Movie Theater w/Madnre screen 5925 50 -1000% $188 50 .1000% 54,535 51,493 -67.1%' Np N3 Ne. 522,703 57,096 488%, 9/3 n/4 n/4 520 Elementary School (740079.6-5.) student 510 SO -100.0% 512 50 .100.0% 570 515 -78.6%1 n/0 n/. n/, 5149 5164 10.1% n/a 1V2 Na 522 Middle School (Prime. 6.9) student 510 $0 -1000% 502 SD -1000% ; 570 518 -743% ; 9/2 N1 Na ' $149 3225 51.0% ! 0/1 Na n/3 530 High School (Private, 9.12) student 313 SD 400.0% 513 SO .100.0% S90 570 -778%- n/a n/3 n/a 5538 5237 45.916' 9/3 n/a n/a 540/550 University/Junior College 17,500 or fewer students.) student $11 50 -100.0% $13 SO -100.0%' 576 525 47.9%1 9/3 n/a Nal 5653 5443 -32.2%' n/8 Na Na Na Ore Ra0on 10005f 565 50 -100.0% 594 SO .100.09$ I 5339 5157 -53.7%' n/a Na Na $983 5324 470% 1 n/a n/a Na 'For CducaDo al Facilities Impaction. the Sl ngle Family(detached) rate should also [mused f rYinpefamll Attached/Townhouse residential land use Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 J-5 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study ITE LUC RES1DEN774L Table J-3 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Affordable Growth Fee; Town of Indian River Shores City Admin Fee (2.0%) County Admin. Fee (1.0%) Total (All Fees) Land Use Unit 2009 Affordable Percent 2009 Affordable Percent 2009 Affordable Percent Adopted Rate Growth Change Adopted Rate Growth Change Adopted Rate Growth Change 210 Single Family (detached) - less than 1,000 sf - 1,000 t0 1299 sf du 5111 $122 9956 556 561 8.9% $5,736 56,269 93% du 5111 5132 18.9% 556 566 17.9% 55,736 56,781 18.2% 220 -1,500 to 2,499 sf du 5143 $147 2.896 $72 574 2.8% 57,388 57,582 2.6% - 2,500 sf or larger du 5156 $166 6,4% 078 $83 6.4% 58,027 58,531 6.3% Muld-Family/Accessory Unit du 570 584 20.0% 535 542 25.0% 03,596 54,335 20.6% 240 Mobile Home/RV (ded down) du 561 $69 13.1% 531 535 12.9% 53,156 53,578 13.4% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel MOT 563 523 33.5% 532 011 35.6% $3,248 $1,166 -64.1% 320 Motel roorn 537 517 .54.1% 519 58 -57.9% $1,921 5861 -55.2% 620 Nursing Home bed $18 59 -50.0% 59 55 -44.4% 5911 5466 -428% 252 Assisted Care Uving Facility (ACM bed 522 510 -545% 511 55 -543% 51,134 5495 -563% MRCS FINANCIAL. 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 s1 5300 592 393% 0150 546 -693% 515,440 $4,743 -693% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 sl 5300 5134 -553% $150 167 -553% 515,440 $6,913 -55.2% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000 sf 5248 5106 -57.3% 5124 553 -573% 012,790 55,446 -57.4% 912 Bank/Savings Orive-In 1,000 si $290 5136 -53.1% 5145 $68 -53.1% $14,938 $6,992 -53.2% 710 General Office 1,000 sf 5102 $43 -578% 051 522 46.9% 05,248 52,231 -573% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000,1 $71 $33 -53.5% 535 016 -543% 53,634 51,685 -53.6% INDUSTMAL. 140 Manufacturing 1,000 sl 540 $16 40.0% $20 58 30.0% 52,044 5812 -603% 150 Warehousing 1,000 sf 532 $14 -563% 516 57 -563% 51,653 5708 -57.2% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000 sl $19 55 -73.7% 59 52 -77.8% 5957 $239 -75.0% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000 sf 532 17 -78.1% 516 13 -81.3% 51,653 5340 -79.4% 110 General Light Industrial 1200 sf $65 528 -56.9% 532 514 -56.3% 53,324 51,420 -573% n/a Concrete Plant acre $138 562 -55.1% 569 531 -55.1% 17,097 $3,183 -55.2% n/a Sand Mining CUT 521 58 41.9% 511 54 43.6% 51,101 5408 42.9% RETAIL: 820 Reta(1 1,000 slgla 5105 569 -343% 552 $35 -32.7% 55,399 53,558 -34.1% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 5135 155 -593% $67 528 -58.2% $6,937 52,847 -59.0% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf 5226 $82 43.7% 5113 541 43.7% $11,663 54,222 -634% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sl $544 5220 -59.6% $272 $110 -59.6% 120,021 511,312 39.6% 934 Fart Food Rest w/Drive-Thru 1,000 sf 5804 5454 .435% 5402 5227 .433% 541,407 523,362 -43.6% 850 Supermarket 1,000 sl $258 592 343% 1129 546 443% 513,299 54,716 -64.5% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,00011 5161 566 -59.0% 581 533 -59.3% 58,296 53,407 -58.9% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 1318 549 -84.6% 5159 524 .84.9% 516,358 52,499 -84.7% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 sl 5572 5238 -58.4% 5286 5119 -58.4% 529,445 512,275 483% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf 536 $13 43.9% 518 $7 41.1% 51,868 5692 33.016 RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 5257 5163 -36.6% 5129 582 -364% 513,246 58,396 -36.6% 492 Racquet Club/Health Gub/Dance Studio 1,000 sl 5249 $132 .47.0% 5125 $66 -47.2% 512,845 56,854 47.0% 412 County Park acre 518 59 .50.098 59 14 -55.6% 5928 5450 -513% 491 Tennis Court Court $274 5153 .44.2% $137 $76 -44.5% 514,103 57,874 -44.2% 420 Marina boat berth 522 $14 -36.4% 511 57 -364% $1,150 5722 -37.2% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Once 1,000 sf 1312 $151 -51.6% 5156 575 -51.9% 516,062 57,767 -51.6% 590 Library 1,000 sf 5383 $243 -36.6% 5191 $122 -36.1% 519,700 512,516 -365% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf 5197 597 -50.8% 599 548 -51.5% 510,170 54,987 -51.0% 571 bed 517 59 5897 0123 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 510,246 53,918 41.8% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf 5128 557 56,593 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf $101 5152 150 57,824 51.0% 560 Church 1,000 sf 559 526 53,053 940 Movie Theater w/Madnce screen 5568 5172 5284 586 -69.7% 529,241 520 Elementary School (Private, 8.5) student 55 54 52 52 0248 5105 522 Middle School (Private, 6.9) student 0.096 5248 5250 0.8% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 513 55 540/550 unlversity/lunior College (7,500 or fewer students) student $15 09 58 5778 5482 -320% n/a Fire Station 1200 sr 530 510 515 51,530 'For Educational Facifitim Impact Fee, the Single Faniliy (detached) rate should also be used for 'Angie Family Attached/Tovmhouse residend I land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 Impact Fee Update Study Appendix K Master Fee Schedules: Staff Recommended Fee Rates Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table K-1 Master Fee Schedule - Staff Recommended Fee; Unincorporated County Corredkmal Facilities RE 000 land Use Unit 2009 Percent Adopted Rale 5,,d1 Percent - RE*IDE871AC. • - - - - -- _ _ - _ Solid Waste Facilities i70,19Percent Adopted Rate ltdil Change public Buildings 2881 reptant Adopted Rate Stall Change Libraries 1211119Inrenn, Adopted Rate Staff Change rmerRen_ry 51felasIw 2009 percent Adopted Rale Staff Change � ent.o� at 2009 percent Adopted Rate Staff Change - - . ._ ... 210 Single Family (detached) • less than 1,000 51 du 5151 $0 -1000% 575 $0 -100.076 5133 5329 77.0% 5430 50 40088. 5247 2274 10.9% 5218 5381 74870 -1000 001499 sf du 3151 50 -100.070 575 55 -100.070 5183 5348 90.2% 5430 50 -100870 5297 5295 19.8% 5218 5411 88.5% • 1,500 to 2,499 If du $170 50 -100870 575 50 -100.070 5206 5370 798% $483 50 4000% 5278 5314 12.970 5245 5436 720% • 2,500 sf or larger du 5184 50 -100.0% 575 50 -100870 3223 5413 852% 5524 50 -100810 5301 5348 15.6% $265 5485 83.0% 220 Multi-Family/Accessory Unit du 5100 $0 400.0% 557 $0 -100.0% 5121 3209 71.7% 5285 $0 -1008% 5176 5181 2.8% 5148 5249 68.2% 240 Mobile Home/RV Died down) du 5123 50 -100.070 575 50 -1008% 5149 0235 57.7% 5349 50 -1004% 5182 5197 8.2% 5158 5244 54.4% • TRANSMIT, ASSISTED, GROUP -• - • _ .. . _ .. .. .., . - . .. .. - 310 Hold 599 $0 -100.0% 521 50 -1000% 5229 581 -64.6% Na Na n/a 5160 5131 -18.170 5140 5178 27.1% 320 14000 r 599 50 -100.0% 511 50 -000.0% 5229 575 -67.270 Na 0/1 n/a 5160 5121 -24.470 5140 5184 17.170 620 Horne Nursing Hoe 0ed 5107 50 -100.0% $33 SD -100.0% $312 5115 -63.1% n/8 N8 n/8 3172 5185 7.6% 5151 5252 65.9% 252 Assisted Care Ud ng Facility (ACIP) bed 3107 50 -1004% 562 $0 -100.0% 5312 5115 -63.1% Na N. Na 5172 5185 7.6% 5151 5252 66.9% ._.-- . ... OFFICE I FINANCIAL:... -., ... - - --_. _ .. .. - .. .. 720 Medical Office/0141c 10,000810,1es, 1,00011 5186 $0 -100.0% 51113 50 -100.014 51,275 5142 48.9% Na N. n/a $299 5229 -23.4% 5262 5312 19.1% Medical Offce/Mialt greater Man 10,400 sf 1,000 sf $186 50 -100.0%1 $118 SD -100.0% 51,275 5207 438% Na n/a n/a 5299 5334 11.7% 5262 $455 73.7% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000 sf $212 50 -1004% 51113 $0 -100.0% 51,454 5279 408% Na 0/4 n/a 5341 5449 31.7% 5299 5611 1043% 912 8ank/Sad00es OriarIn 1,0001( 5174 50 -100.070 5118 50 -100.070 51,191 5285 -76.1% Na Na N. 52110 5459 63.9% 5245 5625 155.1% 710 General Office 1,0001( 5153 50 -100.0% 594 50 •100.070 51,050 5125 -88.1% n/a 0/8 a/a 5246 5201 -183% 5216 5274 26.9% 760 Research % Development Center 1,000 s1 581 $0 -1000161 590 50 -100.0%, $555 5106 -80.9%, N4 n/a n/a 5130 5111 313% 5114 $233 104.4% v > - .. INO167RZ4L•+ .•- - - LL - - .. _. -s -, - I40 Manufacturing 1,400 s1 555 SO -100.0% 5236 30 -100.0% 1 5375 $63 432% Na 0/1 n/a 388 5101 14.8% 577 5137 77.9% 150 Warehousing 1,0001( 542 50 -100.070 547 50 -1000% 5288 535 -878% Ne n/a n/a $68 555 -17.6% 359 577 303% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,00011 58 50 -100.0% 519 50 •100.0% 540 58 ' 408% n/a n/a n/a , 513 512 -7.7% 512 516 333% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,0005( 542 50 -100.0% 507 SO -100.016 $288 518 .938% n/a Na n/a 568 524 -588% 559 538 -35.6% 110 General URhtlndusMel 1,000 s1 575 50 -100.0% 5236 50 -100.0% 551E 586 43.2% n/8 n/a n/a 0120 5139 15.8% $105 5189 80.0% n/a Concrete plant itre 5165 50 -100011 5213 $0 400.0% 51,130 5194 422% Na Na 4/, 5265 5312 17.7% 5232 5425 83.2% n/8 Sand mining 58r8 501 $0 -100.0% 5213 50 -100.0% 5145 $25 422% Na Na n/a 534 540 17.6% 530 555 833% . ... ... . .. - 820 Retail 1,000 s081a 5312 50 -100.0% 3236 50 -100.070 31331 5296 40.7% n/4 Na Ne 5503 5477 -5.2% 5441 5650 47.4% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. $188 50 -100.0% 539 50 -100.0% 5921 3239 -748% n/8 n/a Na 5303 5385 27.1% 5265 3523 97.4% 841 Hew/Used Auto Sales 1,0001( 5186 50 -100.076 5118 $0 -100.0% $912 5189 -792% Na Na n/a 5300 5298 -13% 5263 5403 53.2% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sI 5800 54 -100.0% 5330 50 -100.006, 53,923 5847 •782% Na n/a n/a 51,289 51,365 5.9% 51,129 51,858 64.6% 934 Fast Food Reit. w/Drive.Thru 1,0001( 5863 30 400.0% 5330 S0 400.0% $4,227 $1,111 -73.7% Na Na n/a 51,389 51,792 29.0% 51,217 32,439 100.4% 850 Supermarket 1,00081 5222 50 -100076 $424 50 -100.0% 51,087 $256 -762%. Na Na n/a 5357 5413 15.7% 5313 5562 79.6% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,00011 570 50 -100.0% 520 50 -100.0% 5134 5187 39.6% n/4 Na n/a 5107 5302 182.2% $114 5411 2605% 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 5206 50 -1004% 577 50 -1004% 51,009 5109 -892% n/4 Na Na $332 5175 47.3% $291 3238 482% 853 Convenience Market with Gas pumps 1,0008( 5463 SO -100.0% 5424 50 -100.0% $2,270 5728 -67.9% 4/a N4 n/a 5746 51,174 57.4% 5653 $1,598 144.7% 890 Furniture Store 1,00011 535 50 -1008% 5236 50 -100.0% $170 529 42.5% Ne Na n/a $56 $46 -17.9% 549 563 28.6% - --.. u. ....., ... ..._ ... -._.. •. _ -- - _ .._ . -- W.430 430 Goll Course hole 5267 50 -1000% 538 $0 -100.0% 1 51,307 5135 49.7% Na Na Na 5429 5217 494% 5376 5296 -213% 491 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,00011 3259 50 -1008% 5128 50 -100.0% 51,270 5386 -69.6% Na Na n/a $417 5622 49.2% 5366 5847 131.4% 012 County park 1805 317 50 -100.0% 385 S0 -100.0% 331 $25 49.1% n/4 n/a n/4 527 $40 48.1% $23 $55 139.1% 491 Tennis Court court 3253 50 400.0% $18 50 -100.0% 51,241 $395 482% n/a N4 n/4 3408 5635 55.9% 5357 $866 102.6% 420 ...Ina boat berth 317 50 -100.0% 545 50 -100.0% 582 524 -70.7% Na Na n/a 527 538 40.7% $24 352 116.7% -�. ._. . s GOVERNMENTAL: , .2- .-- - ...._ ._ __ .< 732 Post Office 1,000 sf 5194 50 -100886 594 50 -1004% 51,107 5203 41.7% Ne Na n/a 5312 5326 45% 5273 5444 62.6% 590 *brary 5,0097 5188 50 -100411 594 30 -100.0% 5919 5220 -76.1% n/a n/a 00/a 5302 5354 17.2% 5265 $082 81.9% 733 Government 0f0ce Comptes 1,000 sf 5148 50 -100.0% 594 $0 -1000% n/a Na Na Na Na Na 5238 5280 17.6% 5209 5381 823% 571 1411 bed Na n/a n/a 515 SD -1000% 5466 5174 42.7% n/a Na n/a 5153 5175 14.4% 5134 $238 77.6% -•••• _ MOCEI6ANE0U5: .. , - • • • - - - '- 565 Day Ca reCenter 1,0008( 5110 50 -1004% $236 50 -100.070 3755 5111 453% n/a 0/2 n/a $177 5179 1.1% 5155 5244 57.4% 610 Hospital 1,000 sf 5171 50 -100.0% $83 $0 -1000% 5838 3171 -79.6% ' a/a Na n/, ' 5275 5276 0.4% 5241 5375 55.6% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf 5178 50 -1000% 5118 50 -1000% 51,223 5317 -74.1% Na Ne n/a 5287 5511 78.0%. 5251 5596 1773% 560 Church 1,0001( 558 $0 -1008% 533 50 -1000% 5285 560 -775% Na Na 0/a 594 5103 9.6% . 582 5140 70.7% 444 Movie Theater w/Matinee screen 3925 50 -1000% 5188 $0 -100.0% $0,535 5747 -835% Na N9 n/a 31,090 51,204 -19.2% 51,305 51,639 25.6% 520 Demmtary School (private, 6-5) student 310 50 -1000% 512 50 -1004% 570 58 -88.6%' Na No n/4 317 512 -294% 514 515 143% 522 Middle School (private, 6.9) student $10 $0 -200.016 512 30 -1000% 370 59 47.1% n/a N9 n/a 517 514 -17.6% 514 519 35.7% 530 Hies School (private, 9.12) student 513 50 -100816 513 50 4000% 590 510 48.91, N4 04 0/a 521 516 -23.8%' $18 $22 222% 540/550 University/0unior College (7,500 or few, stud.%) student 311 50 400.016 513 50 -1000% 378 $13 43.3% n/a N4 n/a 518 $20 11.1% 016 527 68.8% n/a Fire1100on 100081 569 SO -100.0% 594 50 -1004% 5339 579 .76.7% Na n/0 Ne N4 Na Na 597 5173 78.4% 'For 06,1,00 al Facilities Impact Fee, the Single Family !detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Famll Attached/Tenmhouse' redden 1 I land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 K-1 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study Table K-1 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Staff Recommended Fee; Unincorporated County Parks & Recreation GT LUC Land Use Unit 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Stall Change - - RESIDENTIAL. - - _ __ _ Transportation 2009 Portent Adopted Rate Stall Change Educational Facilities' 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Stall Change Administrative Fee 12.5%1 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Stall Change Total (011 fee,) 2009 Percent Stall Adopted Rate Change -- 210 Single Family (detached) - Less than 1,0005( du $1,302 51,170 -10.1% 52,974 53,149 5.9% 51,756 51,702 -3.1% 5183 5175 4.496 57,519 $7,175 -4.6% -1000 to 1/199 91 du 51,302 51,263 -3.0% $2,974 53,554 195% 51,756 51,702 -3.1% 5183 $189 3396 57,519 57,763 3.296 - 1,500 to 2,499 sf du 51,463 51,343 -8.2% 54,483 54,248 -5.296 51,756 $1,702 -3.1% 5229 5210 -8.3% 59,388 58,623 -8.2% - 2,500 sf or larger du 51,587 51,493 -5.9% 55,031 55,004 .0.5% $1,756 51,702 -3.1% 5249 $236 -5.2% 510,195 59,681 -5.0% 220 Multi-Famliy/Accessory Unit du 5884 5767 -13.2% 52,428 52,742 12.9% 5500 $668 33.7% 5117 $120 2.6% 54,816 54,936 25% 240 Mobile Home/RV(tled down) du $942 $749 -20.5% 51,745 51,550 -112%i 5623 $1,026 64.7% 5109 5100 .83% 54,455 54,101 -7.916 TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: -^ - -- 31D Hoer f 00111 n/a n/a n/a 52,804 5970 .65.4% n/a 0/6 n/a 586 534 -603% 53,539 51,394 -60.696 320 Motel room n/a n/a n/a 51,516 5686 -54.7% n/a n/a n/a ' 554 526 -51.9% ' $2,219 51,072 -51.7% 620 Nursing Home bed n/a n/a n/a $432 5222 48.6% n/a n/a n/a 530 519 -36.7% 51,237 $793 -35.9% 252 Assisted Care Living FOC1IIty IACLS) bed n/a N. n/a 5620 $250 -59.7% n/a n/a n/a 1 $36 520 -44.49 51,460 5822 -43.796 - OFFICE& FINANCIAL. - - - - - - '-- - - - 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 sf n/6 n/a n/a 513,411 54,321 -67.8%, n/a n/a n/a $389 $125 -67.9% 515,940 55,129 -67.8% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf n/0 n/a n/a 513,411 56,298 -53.0% n/a n/a n/a 5389 $182 -53.2% 515,940 57,476 -53.1% 911 8ank/SaW ngs Walk -In 1 000 sf n/a n/a n/a 510,634 54,730 -55596 n/a n/a n/a 5326 0152 -53.4% 513,384 56,221 -53.5% 912 Bank/SaWngs Drive -In 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a 513,020 56,219 -52.2% n/8 n/a Na 5376 5190 • 493% 515,404 57,778 -495% 710 General Office 1,000 s1 n/a n/a 0/6 53,798 51,916 -09.6% n/a n/a n/a 5139 563 -54.7% 55,696 52,579 -54.7% 760 RCM rch& Development Center 1,00011 n/a ./a n/a 52,798 51,424 49.1% n/a n/8 n/a $94 548 -08.9% 53,866 51,982 -08.7% INDUSTRIAL: __ ,_ _ _• -_,f _ _ _ _ _ 140 Manufaetudng 1,0001/ n/a n/a n/a 51,318 $663 49.7% n/a n/a n/a 554 524 -55.6% $2,203 $988 -55.2% 150 Warehousing 1000 sf n/a n/a n/a • 51,228 5617 .499% n/a n/a n/a $43 520 -533% 51,775 5805 -54.696 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,0001( n/o n/a n/a 5862 5217 -749% n/a n/a n/a 524 56 -75.0% $978 5259 -735% 152 High -Cube (Autonnated)Wa raouse 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 51,228 5295 -76.0% n/a n/a n/a 543 59 -79.1% 51,775 5388 .78.19 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 52,404 51,206 -49.8% n/a n/a n/a $86 541 -52.3% 53,538 51,661 -53.196 n/a Concrete Plant aCre n/6 n/6 n/a 55,382 52,703 49.8% n/a n/a n/a $185 591 .50.8% $7,572 53,725 -50.8% Oa Sand Mining acro n/a n/a n/a $690 5346 49.9% n/a n/a n/a 528 $12 57.1% $1,161 5478 -58.8% RETAIL, 820 Retail 1,000 efgla n/a n/6 n/6 53,163 52,862 23% n/a n/a n/8 5155 $107 -31.0% 56,341 54,392 -30.716 944/946 Gasoline/Service Station wit or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. n/a n/a n/a 55,587 52,287 -59.1% n/a n/a n/a 5183 $86 53.0% 57,486 53,520 .53.016 841 New/Usel Auto Sales 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a 510,108 53,732 -63.1% n/a n/a n/o 5297 5115 -613%, 512,184 54,730 -61.2% 932 Restaurant 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a $22,152 59,289 -58.1% ' n/a n/a n/a 5741 5334 -54.9% 530,364 513,693 -549% 930 Fast Food Rest.w/Drive-Thru 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a 534,781 520,459 41.2% n/a n/a n/a 51,070 5645 -39.7% $43,877 526,446 -39.7% 850 Supermarket 1,00051 0/a n/o n/o 511,179 54,066 -63.6% n/a n/a n/a 5340 5132 {32% 513,922 55,429 -61.096 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf n/a 0/6 n/a 57,830 $2,934 -62.5% n/a n/a n/a 5207 596 -53.6% 58,482 53,930 -53.7% 947 Seif.Service Car Wash service bay n/a 0/6 n/a $14,589 52,209 -84.9% n/a n/a n/a $413 $68 -835% 516,917 52,799 -8359 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a 525,430 $10,463 -589% n/a n/a n/a 5750 $349 -535% 530,736 514,312 -53.4% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 s1 n/a 0/a n/a $1,373 $615 -55.2% ' n/a n/a n/a 548 519 -60.4% 51,967 5772 -60.8% RECREATIONAL: - - _ _ _ _ -. 430 Golf Course hole n/6 n/a n/a 511,248 57,882 -29.9% n/a n/6 Ma ' $302 5213 -37.7% 514,007 58,743 -37.6% 492 Racquet Club/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,000 sf n/6 n/a n/a 510,824 55,835 46.1% n/a n/a n/a 5331 5192 42.0% 513,585 57,882 -42.0% 012 County Park acre n/a n/a n/a 5718 5387 -06.1% n/a n/a n/a $20 513 -459% 5975 5520 46.7% 491 Tennis Court court n/a n/a n/a $12,180 56,856 43.7% n/a n/a n/6 5361 5219 -39.3% 514,818 58,972 -395% 420 Marina boat berth n/a Ma n/8 5973 5654 -32.8% n/a n/a n/6 529 519 -345% 51,197 5787 -343% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a 514,199 57,136 49.7% n/a n/a n/a $004 5203 49.8% $16,583 58,312 499% 590 Library 1,000 sf n/a n/a Ma 517,925 511,712 -34.7% 0/a Ma n/o $492 5319 -35.2% 520,185 513,087 -35.2% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 59,632 $4,842 49.7% n/a n/a n/a 0258 $138 465% 510,579 55,641 -06.796 571 Tall bed 0/1 n/a n/a 5389 5949 144.0% n/a n/6 n/a 529 538 31.016 51,187 51,574 32.6% MISCELLANEOUS: ___ 565 Day Care Center 1,0001( n/a n/a n/a 58,847 53,582 -595% n/a 0/4 n/8 5257 5103 -599% 510,537 54,219 -60.0% 610 Hospital 1,0005( n/a n/a n/a $5,309 52,498 529% n/a 0/4 0/4 $173 583 .52.016 57,090 53,403 -52.0% 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 53,511 56,962 983% n/a n/a 0/a 5139 5212 52.5% 55,707 58,698 52.4% 560 Church 1,000 s1 n/6 n/a n/a 52,388 51,154 -55.4% n/a n/a n/a $79 537 -53.2% 53,219 51,498 -53.5% 004 Movie Theaterw/Matinee screen n/a n/a n/a 522,743 57,096 -6899 n/a n/a n/a 5780 5267 -659% 531,966 510,953 -65.7% 520 Elementary School (0,1065599-5) student n/a n/a n/a 5149 $164 10.1% n/a n/a n/a $7 55 -28.6% 5279 5205 -263% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student n/a n/a n/a 5149 $225 51.0% n/a n/a n/a 57 $7 0.0% $279 $274 -1.8% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student n/a n/a n/a 5538 5237 -559% n/a Ne n/a 517 57 -58.8% 5710 $292 58.9% 540/550 University/Junior College(7,500 or fewer student) student n/a n/a n/a 0653 5443 -32.2% n/a n/a n/a 520 513 -35.0% 5809 5516 -362% n/a Rre Station 1,000 s1 Na n/a Oa 5983 0324 -67.0% n/4 n/a Oa 540 514 -65.0% 51,622 $590 -63.6% 'Nor Educational Facilities Impact Fee, the Si ogle Family (detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Family Attached/Townhouse' rel dell a1 land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 K-2 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table K-2 Master Fee Schedule - Staff Recommended Fee; City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, City of Sebastian, City of Vero Beach Correctional Facilities OF LUC land the Unit 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Staff Change 81910 07141. , ,. -. ,_ -- -- -s-. Solid Waste Facilities 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Scall Change Public Buildings 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Stall Change libraries 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Staff Change Emergency Services 2029 Percent Adopted Rate Stall Change Transpnrtati0n 2009 percent Adapted Rate Staff Change 210 _ Single Farrah/(detached) - less than 1,000 s1 du 5151 50 .100816 $75 50 -100.0% 5183 $324 77.0% 5430 $0 -1000% 5247 5274 10.994 $2974 53349 5.9% 1,000 to 1,699 sf du 5151 50 .100,091 575 $0 -100,091 $183 5343 90.2% 5430 50 -100091 5247 5235 19.891 52,974 53,554 19591 - 1,500 412,499 sf du 5170 50 .100.01 575 50 -100,091 I 5206 5370 79.6% 5483 50 -100091 5278 $314 12.9% 54,453 54,248 -5.2% - 2,500 sl or larger du 5184 SO -1000% 575 50 -1000% 5223 5413 85.2% 5524 $0 .100,091 5301 5348 15.6% 55,031 15,004 -0.5% 220 Mu10-Family/4c8ess8r4 Unit du 5100 50 -100,091 557 50 -100.091 5121 5209 72.791- 5285 50 -100.0% 5176 5181 28% 52,428 52,742 12.9% 240 Mobile Home/RV(tied down) du 5123 50 .1000% 575 50 -100.0% I $149 5235 573% $349 $0 .1000% $182 5197 8.2% 51,745 51,550 -11.2% • - TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP:, -,��. ._ .._ _ _ _ .. ..,. .- ..�, ._. -.- --,. .-..... .J.. .. -• ... 310 ROM room 599 50 -1000% 521 50 .1000% 5229 581 -646% Na 9/1 Na 5160 5131 -18.1% 52,804 5970 45.4% 320 MotelMOT 599 50 .1000% 521 50 -1000% 5229 575 -67.291 Na n/1 Na 5160 5121 -24,6% 51,516 5686 -54.7% 620 Nursing Home bed 5107 54 .100.0% $33 50 -100.0% $312 5115 43.1% - Ma n/a Na 5172 5185 7.6% $432 $222 08,616 252 Assisted Care Uvl ng Facility (ACIP) bed 5107 $0 -1000% $62 50 -100.0% 5312 5115 -63.1% n/a n/a n/. 5172 5185 7.6% 5620 5250 .59.7% .. _.... -05118 -.... . . _ ..,.- -. .a..,..... ]20 Medical 0fflce/a InIc 10,000 sf or less 1,000 s? 5186 50 .100.0% 5D .100.0% 51,275 $142 48,9% Na n/a n/a 5299 5229 -23,4% 513011 54,521 47.8% MMlcal Office/Oleic greater than 10,000 sr 1,000 s1 5186 $0 -1000% 5118 $0 .1008% 51,075 5207 438% 7/4 7/4 n/a 5299 $334 11.7% 513,411 56,298 -53.0% 911 Bank/Saving, Walk -In 1,0008f $212 SO -100.0% 5118 50 .100.0% 51454 5279 408%. Na Na N. 5341 5449 31.7% $10 634 54,730 .555% .912 Bank/Saving, Odveln 1,000 s1 5174 50 -100.014 5118 50 -1000% $1,191 5285 -76.1% n/a 9/, n/4 5280 5459 63.916. 013,020 $6,219 -52.2% 710 General Office 1,000 s1 5153 50 .100.0% 594 50 -100091 51,050 5125 -88.1% Ne Na n/4 5246 5201 .18391 53,798 51,916 49.6% 760 Research% Development Center 1,00091 581 50 .1008% 594 $0 -1000% 5555 5106 -80.9%, 3/4 n/a n/a 5130 5171 31.5% 52,798 51,424 49.1% ... - INDUSTRIAL - w. • .. _.. �_ . .... . . _ .. ... ..«.47-- . ..4. . .....• _. . . - .. .,. .. . _ .0 -' - - ._ . ,-.., 140 Manufacturing 1,0009? 555 SO 4000% 5236 50 .1000% 5375 563 -833% n/3 n/a n/a 588 5101 14.8% 51,318 5663 49.7% 150 Warehousing 1,00091 542 SO -1008% 547 50 -100.0% $288 535 478% 7/e n/a n/4 $68 556 -17,691 51,228 5617 49.8% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000 s1 58 50 -1008% 519 50 .100,0% $40 58 400% 3/3 n/a n/a 513 512 -7,7% 5862 5217 .74.8% 152 High4lbe(Automated) Warehouse 1,00091 542 50 -1000% 547 50 .1000% 5288 $13 .938% 7/e Na Na $68 528 -588% 51,278 5295 .76.0% 110 General light Industrial 1,000 s1 075 50 -100.0% $236 50 -100.0% 5512 586 43.2% n/9 9/a n/a 5120 5139 15.8%- 52,404 51,206 498% n/2 Concrete Plant 82 re 5165 50 -100.0% $213 50 .100.0% $1,130 5194 428% n/, Ma Na $265 5312 37,7% $5,382 52,703 49.8% Na Sand Mining acre 521 50 .100.0% 0113 50 -1000% 5145 523 .828% n/o n/9 n/a , $34 540 17.6% 5690 5346 49.9% ._-..- -. ... ._. .. _. ,. _._ ..-.z :. -....- ._ _ _ .... __ .. .-_- 4-.. .. b. .. .. ... 820 Retail 1,000 stela 5312 50 .100.0% 5236 50 .100.0% 51,531 5196 .80,7% 0/4 7/9 7/8 5503 5477 -0.2%. 53,163 52,862 -93% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Stadon with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 5188 50 .100.0% 539 50 .1000% 5921 5239 -740% n/a n/a 7/4 5303 5385 27.1%' 55,597 02,287 .59,1% 841 New/Used Auto sates 1,00091 $186 $0 .1000% $118 50 -1000% - 5912 5184 .798% n/a 4/8 n/a 5300 5296 .13% 570.108 53,732 43,1% 932 Restaurant 1,0009? 5800 50 .100.016 • 5330 50 -1000% $3,923 5847 -76491 5/1 7/4 n/a 51,289 51,365 5.9% 522,152 59,289 44.1% 934 Fast Food Rest. w/Ddve-Thru 1,00091 5863 $0 -100.0% 5330 50 .100.0%' 54,227 51,111 -73.7% 7/4 Na n/a 51,389 51,792 290% $34,781 520,459 41,2% 850 Supermartet 1,0009? 5222 50 -1000% 5424 50 -100.0% 51,097 5256 -76A% n/a Na 77/1 5357 5413 15,7%- 511,179 54,066 43.6% 942 097507861le 874317/1304y 5640 1,00091 570 50 .100.0% $20 50 .100.0% 5134 5187 39,6% n/a Na n/a 5107 5302 182.2% 57,830 52,934 423% 947 Self.Service Car Wash cervico bay 5206 50 .100.0% 577 50 .100.0% 51,009 5109 493% n/a 5/4 Na - 5332 5175 473% 514,589 52,209 44.9% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,00091 5463 50 .100.0% 5424 50 .1000%1 52,270 5728 .67,9% n/0 n/a n/4 5746 $1,174 57.4% 525.430 510,463 -58.9% 890 Furniture Store 1,00051 536 SO .100.0% $236 50 -1000% 5170 $29 42,9% 7/4 Na n/a $56 546 -17.9% $1,373 $615 .552% 430 Goll Course hole 5267 $0 -100.0%- 538• 50 .1000% 51,307 $135 49.714 n/4 Na n/a 5429 5217 49.4% $11 248 57,882 -29.9% 492 Racquet aub/Health Club/Dance Studio 1,00091 5259 $0 .1004% 5118 50 .1000% 51,270 5386 49.6% n/a n/4 n/a 5417 5622 49,2% 510,074 55,835 46,1% 412 County Pert etre 517 50 .100.0% $85 50 .1000% $81 525 49,116 eta 9/4 Ma 527 540 48,1% 5718 5387 46,1% 491 Tennis Court court 5753 50 .100,0% 518 50 400.0% 51,241 5395 48,2% 7/4 n/a - Na 5408 5636 55,9%' 512,160 56,566 43.7% 420 Marina boat berth 517 50 -1008% 545 $0 .100.0% 582 524 -]0,]% n/a Na 7/4 527 538 40,7% 1 5973 $654 -32.8% ., GOVOINMENTAL•----'- r -,-•590 a - 550 « - Y .. , . V - - . 49,7% 732 Post Office 1,00011 5194 $0 -100.0% -1000% I 51,107 5203 41,7% Na Na n/4 5312 5326 43%' 514,199, 57,136 590 library 1,000 si 5188 50 .100.0% $94 50 -1000% 5919 5220 .76.1% n/4 11/4 7/4 5302 0354 17.2%- 517,925 511,712 -34.7% 733 Government Office Contain 1,000,? 5145 50 -100.0% $94 50 -1000% Na Na Me' 7/4 Na n/a $239 5280 176% 59,632 50,842 49,7% 571 fall bed n/a Ma n/. 516 50 -100.0% 1 5466 5174 42,7% n/o N4 n/a ' 5153 5175 14.4% 5389 5949 1440% -' '- - ..-- ..--ry- -.100,0% - 3- - ' ~ 4 ~ 5651, Day Care Center 1,000 si $110' $0 $236 $0 .100.0% 5755 5111 .853%' 7/4 Ma n/8 5177 5179 1.1% 58847 53,582 .593% 610 Hospital 1,000 9? 5171 50 -1000% 583 $0 -100.0% 5838 5171 -79.6%- 77/8 Na Ma 5275 5275 0A% 55,309 52,498 -52,916 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,0009? 5178 50 -100.0% 5118 50 -100.0%1 51,223 5317 -74,1% n/a Ma 77/2 5287 5511 78.0%- 53,511 56,952 983% 660 Church 1,00011 558 SO -100.014 533 50 -1000% 5285 564 -773% 1 n/a Na n/a . 594 5103 9.6% 52,568 51,154 -554% 444 Movie Theatre w/Madero Sae. 5925 50 -100,016 $188 50 -100.0%1 54,535 5747 433% n/a Me 7/4 51,490 51,204 .19.2% 522,743 52,096 -68816 520 Oerrcn0ry Sch0ot (Private, 6.51 stueat 510 50 -100.0% $12 $0 -100.0% 1 570 58 .86.616 , n/, Na n/a 517 $12 -29.4% I 5149 5164 10.1% 522 Middle School (Private, 6.9) student 510 50 .1000% 512 50 .1000%1 570 59 47.1% 77/9 Na 3/8 517 514 -12.6% $149 5225 51,03f 530 High School (Private 9-12) student 513 50 -2000%' 513 50 -1000%' 590 510 -88,9X- n/a Me Ma $21 516 -23816 1 5538 0237 -55.9% 540/550 University/Junior College (7300 or fewer students) student 511 SO .100,0% 513 50 -100.0% 578 513 -833%, No Ma Na $18 $20 11,1%' 5653 5443 -32.2% Na Nre Station 1800 s1 569 SO .1008% 594 50 -100,0%' 5339 579 -76.7% n/8 M9 n/a n/a ./a Na - 5983 5324 -67.0% 'For Educati8 al Facilities Impact Fee, the Single Family (detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Fa mil Attothed/Townhouse residential land use Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 K-3 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table K-2 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Staff Recommended Fee; City of Fellsmere, Town of Orchid, City of Sebastian, City of Vero Beach Educational Fadllties- RE LUC Land Use Unit 2009 Percent Adopted Rale Stall Change RESIDENTIAL. City Admin fee (2.0%) 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Slalf Change County Admin. Fee (1.0%) 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Staff Change Total (All fees) 2009 Percent Stall Adopted Rale Change 210 Singte family (detached) - Less than 1,000 sf du 51,756 51,702 -3.1% 5116 $109 -6.0% 558 554 .6.9% 55,990 55,612 -63% •1,000 to 1,499 0 du 51,756 51,702 -3.1% 5116 5118 1.7% 558 $59 1.7% 55,990 56,077 1.4% -1,500 802,49958 du 51,756 51,702 -3.1% 5149 5133 -10.7% $75 566 -12.0% 57,675 56,833 -11.0% • 2,500 0 or larger du 51,756 51,702 -3.180 5162 5149 -8.080 581 575 -7.4% 58,337 57691 -7.8% 220 Multi -Farad ly/Accessory Unit du 5500 5668 33.7% 573 576 4.1% $37 538 2.7% 53,777 53,914 3,6% 240 Mobile Horne/RV(ded down) du 5623 51,026 64.7% 565 560 .7.7% 032 530 -6.3% 53,343 53,098 -73% TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP: 310 Hotel 200221 n/a n/a n/a 566 524 33.6% $33 $12 -63.6% 53,412 51,218 -643% 320 Motel200221 n/a n/a Na 541 518 -56.1% S20 59 -55.0% 52086 5949 •56.4% 620 Nursing Hoe Horne bed n/a n/a n/a 521 510 -52.4% 511 55 -54.5% 51,088 5537 -50.6% 252 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACIE) bed n/a n/a n/a 525 511 -56.0% 513 56 -53.8% 51,311 5567 -56.8% 07710E 8 F18040(AL: 720 Medical Office/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,000 s/ n/a n/a Na $306 $94 -69.3% $153 547 -69.3% $15,748 54,833 -693% Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 s1 n/a n/a No 5306 5137 -55.2% 5153 568 -55.6% 315,748 57,044 -553% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,00001 n/a n/a N4 5255 $109 -573% $128 555 -57.0% 513,142 55,622 -57.2% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 0 Na n/o Na $296 $139 -53.0% 5148 570 -52.7% 515,227 57,172 -529% 710 General 011140 1,000 sf Na n/0 No 5107 545 -573% 553 522 -58.5% 55,501 51309 -58.0% 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf n/a n/a N4 573 534 -53.4% 537 517 54.1% 53,768 51,792 •535% INDUSTRIAL: 140 Manufacturing 1,000 0 Na n/a n/a 541 517 -583% 521 58 -61.9% 52,134 5852 -60.1% 150 Warehousing 1,000 0 n/a n/o Na $33 514 -57.6% 517 57 38.8% 51 723 5729 -57.7% 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000 sf n/a n/a Na 519 $5 -73.7% 59 52 -77.8% 5970 5244 -74.8% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000 0 n/a n/a n/a 533 57 -789% 517 53 -82.4% 51,723 5351 -79.6% 110 General Ught Industrial 1000 sf n/a n/a n/a 567 $29 -56.7% 533 514 -57.6% 53,447 01,474 -57.2% n/a Concrete Plant acre Na n/a Na 5143 564 -55.2% $72 532 -55.6% 57,370 53,305 -55.2% n/a Sand Mining 203e Na n/a Na 522 58 43.6% 511 54 -63.6% 51,136 $423 -62.8% RETAIL 820 Retail 1,000 0414 n/a n/a n/a 5115 573 -36580 557 536 369% 55,917 53,744 -36.7% 944/946 Gasoline/Service Stad on with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. Na n/a n/a 5141 558 -58.9% $70 529 38.6% 57,249 52,998 -58.6% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000sf Na n/a n/a $232 $84 -639% 5116 542 -63.8% 511,972 54338 -63.8% 932 Restaurant 1,000 Sf Na n/a Na 5570 $230 •59.6% 5785 5115 -59.6% 529,349 511,846 -59.6% 934 Fast Food Rest w/OrIve-Thru 1,000 sf n/4 n/a Na 5832 5467 -43.9% $416 5234 -039% 542,838 524,063 -03.8% 850 Supermarket 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5265 595 -64.2% 5133 547 -64.7% 513,667 54,877 44.3% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,000 sf N4 n/o n/a 5163 568 -583% $82 534 -58.5% $8,406 53,525 -58.1% 947 5el1.5ervice Car Wash service bay n/a n/a n/a $324 $50 -84.6% $162 525 -84.6% $16,699 52,568 -84.6% 853 Convenience Market wilh Gas Pumps 1,000 sf n/a n/a Na 5587 5247 -579% 5293 5124 -57.7% 530 213 512,736 -57.8% 890 Furniture Store 1,000 sf n/a n/a Ne $37 514 42.2% $19 57 -63.2% 51,926 5711 -63.1% REC8EAl10NAL• 430 Goff Course hole n/o n/a n/a 5266 3165 -38.0% 5133 382 -38.3% 513,688 58,881 -38.0% 492 Racquet Club/Health a ub/Dance Studio 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a 5258 5137 -469% $129 568 47.3% 513,275 57,048 -06.9% 412 County Park 3022 n/a n/a n/a 519 99 32.6% 59 $5 .44.4% 5956 5466 -51.3% 491 Tennis Court court n/a n/a Na 5282 $158 -04.0% 5141 579 -04.0% 514,523 58,124 -44.1% 420 Marina boat berth Na n/a n/a 523 514 39.1% 511 57 -36.4% 51,178 5737 -37.4% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 Post Office 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5318 5153 -51.9% $159 577 -51.6% $16,383 $7,895 -519% 590 library 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5389 5246 -36.8% 5194 5123 -36.6% 520,011 512,655 -36.8% 733 Government Office Complex 1,000 sf Na n/a rt/a 5202 $102 -095% $101 551 -09.5% 510,415 $5,275 -09.4% 571 Nit bed Na n/a Na 520 526 30.0% $10 513 30.016 51,054 $1,337 26.9% MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5203 $77 42.1% 5101 539 .61,814 510,429 53,988 41.8% 61D Hospital 1,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 5134 $59 -56.0% $67 529 -56.7% 56,877 03,033 -55914 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 s1 n/a n/a n/a $106 5156 47.2% 553 578 47.2% 55,476 58,014 463% 560 Church 1,000 s1 Na n/a Na $61 $26 -57.4% $31 $13 -58.1% 53,150 51,360 -56.8% 444 Moyle Theaterw/Ma0nee screen n/a n/a Na $598 5181 49.7% $299 590 -69.9% 530,778 $9,318 -69.7% 520 Elementary School (Private, K -S) student Na n/a n/a 55 54 -20414 53 52 -33.3% 5266 9190 -28.6% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student Na n/a Na 55 55 04% 53 52 -33.3% $266 5255 -0.1% 53D High 34hool (Private, 9-12) student n/a n/a n/a 514 55 44.3% $7 53 -57.1% 0696 5271 41.1% 540/550 Univers hy/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) student n/a n/a n/a 315 510 -33.3% $8 55 -37.5% 5796 5491 -38.3% n/a Fire Station 1,000 sf Na n/a Na 530 58 -73.3% 515 54 -73.3% 51,530 5415 -729% 'For Wucatie al facilities Impact Fee, the Single Family (detached) rale should also be used for 'Angle Famll Attached/Townhouse resi den lal land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 K-4 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table K-3 Master Fee Schedule - Staff Recommended Fee; Town of Indian River Shores Correctional Fad0(m, ITE LUC land the Unit 2009 Percent Adopted Rate $1411 Change - .- 3510002141.-..- ...._.... ... ... _ - Sona Wade 0,011les 2009 Percent Adopted Rale Staff Change Public Buildings 2009 Percent Adopted 3,44 Stall Change • ... - Libraries 2009 Percent Adopted Rale Stall Change Transportation 2009 Percent S 0410190 flare tall Change - Educational Facilities' 2009 Percent Adopted Rate Stall Change _ - - -. .. _ .. 210 51ngle Family (detached) - - Leos than 1,000 sf du 5151 50 -100,031 525 $0 -100,031 $183 5314 220% 5430 50 -100031 52,924 53,149 5.9% 51,756 51,702 -3.1% -1,000.1,499 sf du 5151 SO -1000% 525 $0 -100031 $183 5348 90.2% 5430 50 -100031 52,924 53,554 193% 51,756 51,702 -3.1% •1,500.2499,7 du 5170 50 -100031 575 $0 -100,031 5206 5370 29.631 5433 50 -100031 54,483 54,248 -5.231i 51,756 51,702 -3.1% - 2300 sl or larger du 5184 $0 -100031 575 50 -1000% 5223 5413 85231 5524 50 -100,031 55,031 15,000 .05% 51.756 51,702 -3.1% 220 Multl.9004l0/716e31079 Unit du 5100 50 -100031 557 50 .100.0% 5111 5209 22.231 5285 50 -1000% 52,428 52,242 12.9% 5500 5668 33.2% 240 Mobile Ho/IN fled down) du 5123 $0 -100.0% 525 SO -100.0% $149 5235 52.2% $349 50 -100010 51,245 51,550 -11.2% 5623 51,026 64.2% • • TRANSIENT, ASSISTED, GROUP:. - - - - - -. f 310 Hotel mom 599 50 -1000% $21 50 -1000% 5229 581 bib% Na No Na 52,004 5920 -654% Na I/O Na 320 Mollr 599 $0 -1000% $21 50 -1000% 5229 575 42.2% Na n/a n/. 51,516 $686 .54.2% n/a n/a n/a 620 Horsing Hoe Honm bed 5102 $0 -100.0% 533 50 -1000% 5312 5115 43.1% 0/o Na Na 5432 5222 48.6% n/a n/a n/2 252 Assisted Care Uvino Facility ]ACU) bed 5102 $0 -1000% $62 50 -1000%, 5312 5115 -63.1% 73/2 Na n/a 5620 5250 -59.2% 0/0 n/a n/. - ..... . OFFICE ANNANCML:. ._ ... .. - _. ..._. _. . _ 720 Medical Office/Clink 10,000sfor less 1,000 s1 5186 50 -1000% 5118 $0 -100.0% $1,225 5142 48.9% Na Na n/a 513,411 54,321 -623% Na Na Na Medical Office/Clinic greater than 10,000 s1 1,000 st 5186 $0 -1000% 5118 50 -1000%- 51,225 5202 438% n/a n/a n/a 513,011 56,290 -530% n/a Na 73/1 911 Bank/Savings Walt -In 1,000 sf 5212 50 -1000% 5118 50 -1000% 51,450 5279 -302% n/a n/a Na 510,634 54,730 -553% n/. n/a 0/2 912 Bank(Savings Ddvoln 1000,1 5174 50 -100014 5118 50 -1000% 51,191 5285 -26.1% n/a n/a n/a 513,020 56,219 -52.2% n/, Na Na 710 General Office 100011 5153 50 -100.0% $94 50 -100.0% 51,050 5125 -88.1% n/o Na n/a 53,799 $1,916 49.6% n/a n/. n/a 760 Research 6 Development Curter 1,000 si 581 50 -1000% 594 50 400.014 5535 5106 -80.9%, n/o n/o 73/4 52,298 51,424 49.1% n/a n/2 7/2 140 Manufacturing 1,000 si 555 50 •1000% 5236 50 •100.0% 5375 563 .832% n/, n/a n/a 51,318 5663 49.2% n/2 No n/a 150 Warehousing 1000 ,i 542 50 -1000% 542 50 -100.0% $288 535 428% Na Na 0/4 51,223 5612 492% Na n/a n/a 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,00011 58 50 -100.0% $19 50 -100.0% 540 58 400% 0/0 Na n/a 5862 5212 -24.8% 73/1 Ma n/a 152 Hi6h[ubO )Automated) Warehou,e 1,000 s1 542 $0 -100010 547 50 -100.0% 5208 $18 -932% 0/0 Na n/1 51,223 5295 -26.0% n/a Na n/a 110 General Light 174519lal 1,000 s1 575 50 -100.0% 5236 $0 -1000% 5512 586 43.2% n/a Ma 0/4 52,404 51,206 49210 n/a n/a n/0 Na Concrete Plant acre 5166 $0 -100.0% 5213 50 -1000%. 51,130 5194 422% n/a Na 'n/a 55,382 52,703 492% 7/1 n/2 n/a Na Sand Mining acre 521 50 -100,091 $213 50 .100.0% - 5145 525 422%% n/2 Na Na 5690 5346 49.9% 0/2 Na n/a .. _ - RETAIL: - - - - _ .. _-.- _c _e ._ , 1-- ... _ .... 820 Retail 1,000 s7gla 5312 50 -100.0% 5236 50 -1000% 51,531 5296 -80.2% n/a Na n/a 53,163 $2,862 -95% n/a n/a Na 944/946 Gasoline/Service 5. don with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. $188 $0 -1000% 539 0 -100.0% 5921 5239 -240% 7/2 Ma n/a 55,582 52,287 .59.1% n/a Na n/4 841 Now/Used Auto sales 1,00011 5186 50 -1000% 5118 50 -1000% 5912 5184 -292% Na Na n/a 510,108 53,232 43.1% Na n/a 73/8 932 129.9111291 1.000 31 5800 50 .100.0%, 5330 50 .100031- $3,923 5847 -282% No Na n/a $22,152 59,289 -58.1% 0/2 N. n/a 934 Fast Food Rest w/Orivolhru 1,000 s1 5863 50 -100.0% 5330 50 -1000%' 54,227 51,111 -23.2% Na Na 73/0 534,281 520,459 41.2% 0/9 N. Na 850 Supermarket 1,000 s1 5222 50 -1000% $424 50 -100015 51.087 5256 -262% 7/0 Na 0/2 511,139 54,055 43.6% n/a n/a Ma 942 Automobile Repair/Body 58017 1,000 s7 570 $0 -1000% 520 50 -1000%- 5134 5182 39.6% n/a Na n/a 52,830 52,934 -625% 73/1 0/2 n/a 947 Self -Service Car Wash service bay 5206 SD -1000% 522 50 -100.010 51,009 5109 4920- Na Ma n/a $14,589 52,209 44.9% 7/1 0/a 73/0 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pump, 1,000s1 5463 50 -100.0%' $424 $0 -1000% 52.270 5228 42.9% n/a Ma I/O $25230 510,463 -56.9% 7/a 7/4 n/a 890 Furniture Store 100011 535 50 -1000% 5236 50 -100.0% 5170 529 42.9% 73/2 Na Na 51,323 5615 -55.2% n/a Ma n/a __.e....0. .._,. .. . ._.. _ .., ...... . .... ..... . r,. .,,.. _ ..._ _.- .-... .. -, . .. .. .. -. _ _.. 430 Golf Course hole 5262 $0 -100.0% $38 $0 -100.0%, 51,302 5135 49.2% n/a Na n/, 511,208 52282 -29.9% n/a n/a 7/0 492 Racquet Club/Health tlu./0a nee 55,410 1,000 s1 5259 50 4000% $118 50 -1000% 51,220 5386 -69.6% Na Na n/a 510,824 $5,835 46.1% n/. n/a 0/2 412 County Part acre 517 50 -1000%' 585 50 -100.01t. 581 525 492% n/a Na Na 5218 5382 46.1% 73/1 n/. No 491 Tennis Court court 5253 50 •100.0% 518 50 .1000% $1,241 5395 -682%' 7/0 N4 Ma 512,180 56,856 43.2% n/a 0/1 Na 420 Marino boat berth 517 $0 -100.0%, 545 $0 -1000% $32 524 40.2% n/a Na n/a 0973 0654 .322% n/a Na n/a _ _.. a.._ _ ._ _ .. _ .. .-.._ _ ,._ -. - -- -.,._ - .. .._...� ......._.,.. 732 Post Office 1000 s1 5194 50 -1000%' 594 50✓� -1000% 1 51,101 5203 41.2% No Na n/a 514,199 52,136 49.2% n/a n/a n/1 590 Library 1,000 s1 $188 50 •1000%- 594 50 -1000% $919 5220 -26.1% Na Na n/a 517,925 511,212 -34.2% n/a n/a 0/0 733 Gevernncnt Office Complex 1,000 s1 5148 5o 4000% 594 $0 .1000% Na Ma n/o Na Na n/a $9,632 50,842 49.2% n/a Na Na 571 tali bed n/a Na Na . $16 50 -100.0% 5466 0124 -622% n/o Na n/a 5389 $949 144.0% n/. 0/2 Na ., +5236 - _ _. .... -• 565 Day Care Center 1,000 s1 5110 50 -1000%: $0 -100.0%- 5755 $111 453% Ma Na n/a 58,847 53,582 -593% n/. 0/a n/2 610 Hospital 1000 s1 5121 SO -1000% $83 50 -100.0% 5338 5171 -29.6% n/a Na n/a 55,309 51.493 -52.9% n/a n/a n/a 640 veterinary Clinic 1,000 s1 5178 SD -100.0% 5118 50 -1000% 52,223 5317 -24.1% N4 Na n/a 53,511 56,962 98.3% Na n/a '/0 560 Church 1,000 sf $58 $0 -1000%- 533 50 -100084 52/5 564 -223%' Na Na n/a 52,588 51,154 -55.4% n/a Na Na 444 Movie Theater w/Madnee 59,99A 5925 So -1000%- 5188 50 -100.0% 54,535 5242 435%. M Na 7/1 522,743 57,096 482% n/. Na Na 520 Elementary Scchool(Prlval. 3-5) student 510 50 -100018' 512 50 -100.0% 570 58 48.6% n/a Na n/a 5149 5164 10.1% n/a 0/0 n/a 522 Middle School [Private, 6.9) student $10 50 -1000% 512 50 -100.0% 570 59 42.1% 73/9 Na n/a 5149 5225 51.0% n/. n/. n/a 530 Nigh School (Prlva le, 9.12) student 513 50 -10001 513 50 •1000% 590 510 48.9% 0/2 No Na $538 5237 -55.9% n/a n/a n/. 540/550 Unive0slry/1unlor College (7,500 or fawn students) student 511 50 .100.0%', $13 50 -1000% 528 513 432% Na Na n/2 5653 5443 -32.2% 0/2 Na Na No Fire Station 1,000 sf 569 50 -1000%' 594 50 -100.0% 5339 579 -26.2%- N. N. 0/a 5983 5324 42.0% Na Na Na 'For Educado al Facilities Impact Fee, the Single Family (detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Fandl Anached/Townhouse' residential land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. June 2014 K-5 Indian River County Impact Fee Update Study Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study Table K-3 (continued) Master Fee Schedule - Staff Recommended Fee; Town of Indian River Shores City Admin Fee (20%) ITE LUC land Use Unit 2009 Stall Percent Adopted Rate Change RESIDENTIAL. County Admin. Fee (1.0%) 2009 Stall Percent Adopted Rate Change Total hell Fees) 2009 Staff Percent Adopted Rate Change 210 Single Family (detached) • less than 100011 du $111 5103 -7.2% 056 552 -7.1% 55,736 55,330 -7.1% - 1,000001,499 sf du 1111 5112 0.9% 556 556 0.0% 55,736 55,772 0.6% - 1 500 to 2,499 sf du 5143 $126 -11.9% $72 $63 -1251 57,388 56,509 -11996 - 2,50011 or larger du $156 5142 4.0% 578 571 -9.0% 58,027 57,332 -8.7% 22D Multi -Fa nilly/Accessory Unit du 570 572 2.9% 535 $36 2.9% 53,596 $3,727 3.7% 240 Mobile Hotne/RV(tied down) du 561 556 -8.2% 531 528 -9.7% 53,156 52,895 -83% TRANSIENT ASSISFFO, GROUP: 310 Hotel r 563 521 -66.7% $32 011 -65.6% 13,248 51,083 -66.7% 320 Motelroom 537 515 -595% 519 58 -57.950 51,921 5784 -59.2% 620 Nursing some bed $18 $7 -61.1% 59 $3 .66.7% 5911 5347 -61.996 252 Assisted Care Living Facility (ACLF) bed 522 57 -68.2% 511 54 -63.6% 51,134 5376 -66.8% OFFICE & FINANCIAL: 720 Medical OHlce/Clinic 10,000 sf or less 1,00051 5300 589 40.3% 5150 545 •70.0% 515,440 54,397 •70.2% Medical Office/Olnlc greater than 10,000 sf 1,000 sf 5300 5130 -56.7% 5150 $65 -56.7% 515,440 56,700 -56.6% 911 Bank/Savings Walk -In 1,000 sf 5248 5100 -59.7% 5124 550 -59.7% 512 790 55,159 -59.7% 912 Bank/Savings Drive -In 1,000 s1 $290 5130 -55.2% 5145 065 -55.2% 514,938 56,699 -55.276 710 General Office 1,00051 $102 541 -59.8% 551 520 -60.8% 55,248 52,102 -59.9% 760 Research& Development Center 1,000 s1 571 531 -56.3% 535 515 -57.1% 23,634 51,576 -56.6% INDUS7NIAL. 140 Manufacturing 1,00051 540 515 -625% 520 57 -65.91 52,044 5748 43.4% 150 Warehousing 1,000 7/ 532 513 -59.4% 516 $7 -563% 51,653 5672 -59350 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,00051 519 55 -73.7% 59 $2 -77.8% 5957 5232 -75.8% 152 High -Cube (Automated) Warehouse 1,000 s1 532 56 -813% 516 $3 -81.3% 51,653 5322 -803% 110 General Light tndustrlal 1,000 s/ 565 526 -60.0% 532 513 -59.4% 03,324 $1,331 -60,096 n/a Concrete Plant acre 5138 $58 -58.0% 569 529 48.0% 57,097 52,984 -58.0% n/a Sand Mining 2054 521 57 -66.7% 511 54 •63.6% 51,101 5382 -653% RETAIL. 820 Retail 1,000 81811 5105 563 -40.0% $52 532 -38.5% 55,399 53,253 -39.7% 944/946 Gasoline/Seryl ce Station with or w/o Car Wash fuel pos. 5135 551 -62.2% $67 525 -62.7% 56,937 52,602 -625% 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 s/ $226 $78 -65.5% 5113 539 -65516 511,663 54,033 -65.4% 932 Restaurant 1,000 sf $544 5203 -62.7% $272 5101 -62.9% 528,021 $10,440 40.750 934 Fast Food Rest. w/DrIpo'Thru 1,000 s1 $804 $431 46.4% $402 $216 -463% 541,407 522,217 '463% 850 Supermarket 1,000 8/ 5258 586 -66.7% 5129 543 -66.7% 513,299 54,451 46.5% 942 Automobile Repair/Body Shop 1,00071 5161 $62 -615% 581 531 -61.7% 58,296 53,214 -61.3% 947 Self -Smite Car Wash service bay $318 546 -85.5% $159 523 -85.5% 516,358 52,387 -85.4% 853 Convenience Market with Gas Pumps 1,00071 5572 5224 -60.8% 5286 5112 -60.8% 529,445 511,527 -60.9% 890 Furniture Store 1,000sf 535 $13 -63.9% 518 56 -66.7% 51,868 $663 -64.5% RECREATIONAL: 430 Golf Course hole 5257 5160 -37.7% $129 $80 -38.0% 513,246 $8,257 -37.7% 492 Rac0uet Club/Health Cl uta/Dance Studio 1,000 s1 5249 5124 -50.2% 5125 560 -50.4% $12,845 56,407 -50.1% 412 County Park acre 518 $8 45.6% 59 54 -55.6% 5928 5424 -54.3% 491 Tennis Court court $274 5145 -47.1% $137 573 -46.7% 514,103 57,469 -07.016 42D Marina boat berth 522 514 -36.4% 511 57 46.476 51,150 5699 -392% GOVERNMENTAL: 732 60,001600 1,000 sf 5312 5147 •52.9% 5156 573 -53.2% $16,062 57,559 -52.9% 590 Ubrary 1,00051 5383 5239 -37.6% 5191 $119 -37.7% 519,700 512,290 -37.6% 733 Government 0f0ce Cnmplev 1,80071 $197 597 -50.8% 599 548 -51596 510,170 $4,987 -51.0% 571 loll bed 517 522 29.4% 59 511 22.2% $897 51,356 28.976 MISCELLANEOUS: 565 Day Care Center 1,000 sf 5199 574 -62.8% 599 537 -63.6% 510,246 53,804 -62.9% 610 Hospital 1,000 71 $128 553 -58.6% $64 537 -5785 56,593 52,749 -58350 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 s1 5101 5146 44.676 $50 573 46.0% 55,181 $7,498 44.7% 560 Church 1,000 sf 559 524 -59.3% 530 512 -60.0% 53,053 51,254 -58.9% 444 Movie Theaterw/Madnee screen $568 $157 -72.4% 5284 578 -723% 529,243 58,078 •72.4% 520 Elementary School (Private, 6-5) student 55 53 -40.076 $2 52 0.0% 5248 $177 -28.6% 522 Middle School (Private, 6-9) student 55 55 0.0% 52 52 0.0% 5248 5241 -28% 530 High School (Private, 9-12) student 513 55 -613% $7 52 -71.4% $674 5254 -62.3% 540/550 University/Junior College(7,500 or fewer students) student $15 $9 -40.0% 58 55 -373% $778 $470 -39.6% n/2 Fire Station 1,00051 530 58 -73.376 515 54 -7331 51,530 5415 -72.9% 'for Educational Facilities Impact Fee, the 5ingle Family (detached) rate should also be used for 'Single Famil Attached/Townhouse" residential land use. Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County June 2014 K-6 Impact Fee Update Study