Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
8/4/1992
7 -71 0 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGENDA REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 1992 9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1840 25TH STREET VERO BEACH, FLORIDA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman ( Dist. 2 ) Margaret C. Bowman, Vice Chairman (Dist. 1) Richard N. Bird (Dist. 5) Don C. Scurlock, Jr. (Dist. 3) District 4: Vacant - 99 0_ 1. CALL TO ORDER James E. Chandler, County Administrator Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board 2. INVOCATION - Rev. John Harrington Christ United Methodist By The Sea 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - James E. Chandler 4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Addition of Public Hearing to consider proposed Ordinance on Fire Prevention Code Standards. Withdrawal of Item 14-C, Waste Stream & Assessment Study (SWDD Meeting) S. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS Adoption and Presentation of Proclamation Designating August, 1992 as "Job Training Partnership Act Alumni Recognition Month" in Indian River County 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Sandridge Golf Club - Purchase of New Golf Carts (memorandum dated July 16, 1992) B . Avtleor-iia the Management 6 Budget director To Do the Necessary Amendments for Balancing the Budget for the 1991/92 Fiscal Year (memorandum dated July 24, 1992) C. Release of Utility Liens (memorandum dated July 27, 1992) D. Assumption of County Lien / Rockridge Sewer Project Area (memorandum dated July 27, 1992) AUG - 41992 600K t 104 L— a ) BOOK 'r " -; V. r �d 7: CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd.): E. Proposed Ordinance Entitled: An Ordinance of I.R.C., Fla., Amending Chapter 305 Courts to Include A Distribution of Civil Penalties to the Fund for the Local Law Enforcement Education Fund ( memorandum dated July 29, 1992 ) F. Dock License Agreement - Country Club Pointe, Unit I - James J. Kretsch & Karen Kretsch (memorandum dated July 23, 1992) G. Unisys Consolidated Agreement (memorandum dated July 24, 1992) H. Appointment of Carolyn K. Eggert to Indigent Care Advisory Task Force ( memorandum dated July 1, 1992 ) 8. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Elections Office: Creation of New Precinct 47 memorandum dated July 9, 1992 ) 9:05 a. m. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS Qualification of "Developer" Appointment to LAAC (memorandum dated July 24, 1992) B. PUBLIC HEARINGS None 10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS None 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT None B. EMERGENCY SERVICES None C. GENERAL SERVICES None D. LEISURE SERVICES None E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET None 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd. ): B. VICE CHAIRMAN MARGARET C. BOWMAN C. COMMISSIONER RICHARD N. BIRD D. COMMISSIONER DON C. SCURLOCK, JR. 14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS A. NORTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT None B. SOUTH COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT None C. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Waste Stream 5 Assessment Study Malcolm Pirnie (memorandum dated June 29, 1992) 15. ADJOURNMENT If ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED. ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MAY CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X 408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF MEETING. AUG ® Q; 199 L'il++'' w1 F'41L ` I- -1 BOOK 11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.) : F. PERSONNEL None G. PUBLIC WORKS I. Purchase of Construction Trailer Indian River Boulevard Phase IV (memorandum dated July 27, 1992) 2. Indian River Boulevard Phase III Reduction of Retainage from 10% to 5$ (memorandum dated July 28, 1992) 3. Indian River Boulevard Phase III Change Order No. 9 (memorandum dated July 22, 1992) 4. Request for Block Party - Paradise Park 86th Dr. between 24th St. E 26th St. (memorandum dated July 27, 1992) H. UTILITIES 1 • Water Main Replacement - 49th St. to Gifford Wastewater Treatment Plant (memorandum dated July 27, 1992) 2. Rockridge Tree Removals ( memorandum dated July 27, 1992 ) 3. Sludge/Septage Facility- Change Order #1 (memorandum dated July 24, 1992) 4. Financial Responsibility Commitment Deep Injection Well (memorandum dated July 1, 1992) 5. Extension of Water Service to the Area West of the Middle School on County Road 512 (memorandum dated July 29, 1992) 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY Florida Association of Counties - Finance 8 Administration Policy Development Committee (memorandum dated July 27, 1992) 13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS A. CHAIRMAN CAROLYN K. EGGERT I. Business Incentives ( memorandum dated July 24, 2. Wheeler Committees (memorandum dated July 24, 1992) 3. Resolution Supporting Designation of the Port of Fort Pierce as a "Port of Entry" ( letter dated July 7, 1992 ) Tuesday, August 4, 1992 The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers, 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, August 4, 1992, at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Present were Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman; Margaret C. Bowman, Vice Chairman; Richard N. Bird; and Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Barbara Bonnah, Deputy Clerk. Chairman Eggert called the meeting to order. Rev. John Harrington of Christ United Methodist by the Sea gave the invocation, and Administrator Chandler led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS Chairman Eggert requested the addition of a Public Hearing to consider a proposed Ordinance on Fire Prevention Code Standards. The Public Hearing was advertised, but it was inadvertently left off the Agenda. Administrator Chandler wished to withdraw until a further time Item 14-C -- the Waste Stream & Assessment Study -- as staff would like the opportunity to take a tighter look and see if we can get that cost down further and bring it back to the Board. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously added and withdrew the above items. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS e Proclamation - "Job Training Partnership Act Alumni Recognition Month" Chairman Eggert read aloud the following Proclamation and presented it to Commissioner Bird who accepted it on behalf of Sam Patterson, who could not make today's meeting. 4 BOOK s 9 F,iGt .�P AUG - 4 BOOK C Fri int -�(' P R 0 C L A M A T 1'0 N DESIGNATING AUGUST, 1992 AS "JOB TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT ALUMNI RECOGNITION MONTH" IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the federally funded Job Training Partnership Act (DTPA) is an effective program for assisting school dropouts., welfare recipients, unskilled adults, displaced homemakers, dislocated workers and others who face serious barriers to employment; and WHEREAS, this Board believes that the members of Congress, the press, and Indian River County should be informed of the. positive impact the Job Training Partnership Act has on the lives of our fellow citizens; and WHEREAS, this Board further believes that all the partners in the Job Training Partnership Act system, including federal, state, local. government, business, labor, education, community- based organizations, and service providers must assume an active role in effectively communicating the success of the program; and WHEREAS, the Job Tiaining Partnership Act Alumni (individuals who have succe!,-sfully completed the program) who have overcome their barriers to employment and are now productive members of Indian River County are the best advocates for the program; and WHEREAS, this Board believes that the achievements of the Job Training Partnership Act Alumni should be recognized, and supports the program administered by the Treasure Coast Private Industry Council: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that August, 1992 be recognized as "NATIONAL JTPA ALUMNI MONTH" in Indian River County and urge all citizens to promote and support the work of the Treasure Coast Private Industry Council and its many community partners as they develop a trained workforce and enhance job opportunities for county residents. 1 Dated this 4th day of August, 1992. .1m OF COUNTi, rivlvivi ArI JJ 1 V1,�LC.I v,J OF 1 DIA14 RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By eAtJ1----'- airman 2 CONSENT AGENDA A. Sandridge Golf Club - Purchase of New Golf Carts The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/16/92: DATE: JULY 16, 1992 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR THRU: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOUJ* DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES FROM FRAN B. POWELL, MANAGER DIVISION OF.PURCHASING SUBJECT: SANDRIDGE GOLF CLUB - PURCHASE OF NEW GOLF CARTS BACKGROUND: Bob Komarinetz, Golf Director, sent out a Request For Proposals to purchase new golf carts for replacement of carts presently being used for the past five (5) years and carts to provide service to Phase II of the Club. Proposals were sent to vendors and vendors from the four major companies responded. An evaluation committee of four employees was appointed and a comparison of the proposals was made and ranked as follows: 1. Club Car 2. Yamaha 3. E -Z -Go 4. Hyundia ANALYSIS: Based on the information submitted, the committee determined that Club Car design is best suited to meet the County's requirements and is $413.00 per cart less expensive than next lowest price. This company also agreed to furnish a Range Ball Retrieving Cart which was requested in the RFP, at no extra charge. FUNDING: Monies are in the Renewal and Replacement fund to pay for carts dedicated to Sandridge I and funds are available in the construction budget to pay for carts dedicated to Sandridge II. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff requests authorization to negotiate and purchase 155 golf carts from Club Car, Inc. - East Florida, at a cost not exceed $319,038. 3 AUG ® 4 19ti BOOK 01 FN,,t���� BOOK U 7 PAGE "01 ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved the negotiation and purchase of 155 golf carts from Club Car, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $319,038. B. Authorization of Necessary Budget Amendments for Balancing the Budget for 1991-92 Fiscal Year The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/24/92: TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: July 24, 1992 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET DIRECTOR TO DO THE NECESSARY AMENDMENTS FOR BALANCING THE BUDGET FOR THE 1991/92 FISCAL YEAR CONSENT AGENDA FROM: Joseph A. Bair OMB Director The 1991/92 fiscal year ends September 30, 1992. All budget amendments must be done prior to the close of the fiscal year to be in proper compliance. I would like the Board of County Commissioners to authorize the Management and Budget Director to do the necessary budget amendments for balancing the budget for the 1991/92 fiscal year. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously authorized the OMB Director to do the necessary budget amendments for balancing the budget for the 1991-92 fiscal year. C. Release of Utility Liens The Board reviewed the following memc dated 7/27/92: 4 TO: Board of County Commissioners 4u� Q. A4.th� FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office DATE: July 27, 1992 RE: CONSENT AGENDA - BCC MEETING 8/4/92 RELEASE OF UTILITY LIENS The following lien -related documents are prepared in proper form for the Board to authorize the Chairman to sign them: 1 Release of Special Assessment Liens frcmr ANITA PARK WATER PROJECT in the names of: PARKER JACQUES (2 ) 2. Release of Special Assessment Lien from CITRUS GARDENS WATER PROJECT in the name of: HASKINS 3. Release of Special Assessment Lien from GLENDALE TERRACE WATER PROJECT in the name of: HIPPLE 4. Release of Special Assessment Lien from OLD SUGAR MILL WATER PROJECT in the name of: PANAKOS 5. Release of Special Assessment Liens from PHASE I WATER PROJECT in the names of: RAFF ' BETTINSON PRIME . 6. Release of Special Assessment Lien from SILVER OAKS WATER PROJECT in the name of: Me- ALL - 7. Release of Special Assessment Lien from 12TH STREET WATER . PROJECT in the name of: HABORA 8. Satisfaction of Impact Fee Extension Liens in the names of VANDERVEER WARD jj V 0�;� L� i1 `f P BOOK 90'7; ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved the release of utility liens as listed above. RELEASES ARE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY D. Assumption of County Lien - Rockridae Sewer Project Area The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/27/92: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS erLyoz�-_Vw FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney DATE: July 27, 1992 RE: ASSUMPTION OF COUNTY LIEN ROCKRIDGE SEWER, PROJECT AREA In connection with the sewering of Rockridge, 'the County has an outstanding lien on some property which was owned by Margaret A. Stamm. This property has been sold and the new owners, the O'Connors, have agreed to assume and pay the balance of the monthly payments due on this lien to the County. This is agreeable with the Department of Utility Services. REQUESTED ACTION: Request the Board consent to the Chairman's signing the attached Assumption of Special Assessment Lien form. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissione,r—Scurlock, the -Board unanimously approved the Assumption of Special Assessment Lien form. ASSUMPTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIEN IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 6 E. Scheduling of a Public Hearing for Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 305 - Courts The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/29/92: TO: Board of County Commissioners Q FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney 71� DATE: July 29, 1992 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER 305 COURTS TO INCLUDE A DISTRIBUTION OF CIVIL PENALTIES TO THE FUND FOR THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT EDUCATION FUND. A public hearing date of August 25, 1992 is suggested. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously scheduled a public hearing for August 25, 1992 to consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Chapter 305, Courts, to include a distribution of civil penalties to the fund for the local law enforcement education fund. F. Dock License Agreement - Country Club Pointe - Kretsch The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/23/92: TO: The Board of County Commissioners FROM: A)C/ William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney DATE: Jury 23, 1992 - SUBJECT: Dock License Agreement - Country Club Pointe, Unit 1 JAMES J. KRETSCH and KAREN KRETSCH In accordance with the County's policy on permitting construction of docks on County right-of-way in Country Club Pointe, Unit 1, a License Agreement between James J. Kretsch and Karen Kretsch and Indian River County is presented for approval. RECOMMENDATION That the Board approve the License Agreement and that the necessary insurance be in place prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7 AUG., ����aoKLU BOOK ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved the License Agreement with James J. and Karen Kretsch re permitting construction of docks in Country Club Pointe, Unit 1, as recommended by staff. 8 r Ft" ''E 0 r�r LICENSE AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD G. Unisys Consolidated Agreement - Emergency Services The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/24/92: TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney DATE: July 24, 1992 RE: UNISYS CONSOLIDATED AGREEMENT Pursuant to the attached memo dated June 19, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners authorized the purchase of certain emergency equipment for use in the 911 system. To complete the purchase it is necessary for the Board to authorize the execution of the attached contract with Unisys. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize Emergency Services Director Doug Wright to sign the attached contract on behalf of the County. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously authorized Emergency Services Director Doug Wright to sign the Consolidated Agreement on behalf of the County, as recommended by staff. CONTRACT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 8 H. Appointment to Indigent Care Advisory Task Force The Board reviewed the following letter dated 7/1/92: IRMH Indian River County . ,�� 2 3 456) DIsTRtBv7iv ►-"' Hospital �Q con.,mi„ivS c�� District - `�G Administrator N �`�99 © Attorney o ti per isei *ipwil0�Works �. ay. July 1, 1992 GOtt:. BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2��ZOZ61�I���` Hugh K. McCrystal, M. D. Chairman Ms. Carolyn Eggert Duncan A. Chalmers Indian River County Commission I. R. County Administration Building Donald M. Houpt 1840 25th Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Margaret Ingram Dear Mggert Vincent J. Montuoro The Indian River County Hospital District has G. Julius Rice, D. Min. determined to study the financial, moral, ethical, and social healthcare issues in our community and in Joyce Salter so doing to try to better define its role into the future. As one who has knowledge, experience, and Michael ►. O'Grady, Jr. responsibility with regard to some or all of these Executive Director important issues, I would like to invite you to become an appointed member of the Indigent Care Advisory Task Force. I would. anticipate the task force would meet no more .than monthly, with a goal to complete our study in 6 to 12 months. We will use authoritative resources to assist us as necessary. The issue is one of universal concern and the task force could have a significant local impact. Please contact Mr. O'Grady at the below address to indicate your willingness to participate in this: important question. I look forward to hearing froi., you. Sincerely, Donald M. Houpt, Jr. Chairman, Board of Trustees 9 L oDO ,r �1n BOOK f'Aut 4 Q l m ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously appointed Commissioner Eggert to the Indigent Care Advisory Task Force. ELECTIONS OFFICE - CREATION OF NEW PRECINCT 47 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/9/92: rSIVER G •GoA ym �F July 9, 1992 ANN ROBINSON SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS 1840 25TH STREET, SUITE N-109 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960-3394 TELEPHONES: (407) 567-8187 or 567-8000 r T� HON. CAROLYN EGGERT, CHAIRMAN, BCC FROM: ANN ROBINSON, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS qP.,,o RE: ITEM UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS FOR BCC AGENDA OF TO CREATE A NEW PRECINCT 47 Because the reapportionment of Florida House and Senate districts has come so late, we need to take action quickly to create a new Precinct 47 in the area south of Vista Royale and east of U.S. 1 to the south county line. I waited for a response from Garden Grove to my letter of June 22 before I put this on your agenda. The letter today disapproved our use of their clubhouse as a polling place, but indicated reconsideration would be given next year to the request. We need your approval to create Precinct 47. The polling place for this year would be the same as Precinct 43, Highlands Elementary School, 500 Southwest 20th Street, Vero Beach, Florida. This change is necessary because the Florida Legislature split Indian River County into two state -senate districts, and the more than 1000 voters in the area described are in a different senate district than those voters west of U.S. 1 in Precinct 43 and 46. 10 L_J' ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously ratified the vote taken July 14, 1992 (when Commissioner Bird was not in attendance) creating a new precinct #47, as recommended by Supervisor of Elections Ann Robinson. QUALIFICATION OF "DEVELOPER" APPOINTMENT TO LAAC The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/24/92: TO: Board of . County DATE: July 24, 1992 FILE: Commissioners SUBJECT: Qualification of "Developer" Appointment to LAAC FROM: Carolyn K. Eggert 0 REFERENCES: County Commission Chairman A request has been made by John Morrison for the Board of County Commissioners to revisit the appointment to the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee of the person to fill the °.developer" designation. He feels that our appointment doesn't meet the specifications. Chairman Eggert read aloud the following letter received from Steven G. Wild dated 8/3/92: August 3, 1992 To: Carolyn Egrrt- - Chairperson - Land Acquisition Committee Dear Carolyn: I appreciate having been appuintcd to The Land Acquisition Committee. Unfortunately, however, my new business venture is taking much more of my time than I previously thought it would, and I'm afraid I cannot devote the needed time to this important committee. Please accept my resignation from the .ommittee and good luck to you and all the hard- workitig utarrtbers. Sincerely, Steven G. Wild President, The Davis House Inc. S 11 BOOKS l,� P,� �f ►, Gi BOOK � n ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously accepted the resignation of Steven G. Wild from the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee and authorized the Chairman to send a letter of thanks. Chairman Eggert announced that three people have sent in letters asking to be considered for the appointment: Peter Buetell Bob Swift Bob Burnett Chairman Eggert asked if anyone wished to soiak on this matter while the Board looks over the letters that have been received. John J. Morrison, member of LAAC representing the "Agriculture" interests, believed that the committee needs someone with experience in managing large tracts of land. He felt that at least two of the three people who have expressed an interest in being appointed to the committee are qualified. Herndon Williams, member of LAAC, agreed that the committee should have a representative from the development community who has experience in the management of large tracts of land. He believed that Mr. Swift and Mr. Burnett qualify for the appointment. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously appointed Bob Swift to LAAC as the "developer" representative. Chairman Eggert advised that the overall makeup of the committee will be reviewed. PUBLIC REARING --ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 401.04 FIRE PREVENTION CODES fi STANDARDS The hour of 9:05 o'clock A.M. having passed, Attorney Vitunac announced that this Public Hearing has been properly advertised, as follows: 12 VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL Published Daily Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a In the matter of t� Q� /�) in the . Court, was pub- lished in said newspaper in the issues of { Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun- ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Sworn to and subscribed before me thi arof A.D. 19 _ . i l +r .�� e (Busine s Manager) (SEAL) ' -• -^ ..--. - ..-r- NOTICE". ----- -r— Rh� County Comndast..m of Wan hereby Public H ed for 9:��es room e of a Augusta.m. on Tuesday, ordin112, to di �re�folowin9P eentitled: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUN- 401.04. FIRE PREVENTION TION CODES NDING AND STANDARDS TO REFLECT CURRENT EDITIONS AND SUPPLpEpMeENTS. Anyone who m a the wishR� CU H�arany tn deciaron which, 1992, w41 need to ensue that a verbatImon Arecord of Ulu proceedings to made, which includes tesu � 1 d nc Won which the appeal Is based. 917955 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/14/92: TO: Board of County Commissioners �) FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorneyc��(/ DATE: July 14, 1992 RE: PUBLIC HEARING - August 4, 1992 - PROPOSED ORDINANCED ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 401.049 FIRE PREVENTION CODES AND STANDARDS TO REFLECT CURRENT EDITIONS AND SUPPLEMENTS The Board approved a public hearing date of August 4, 1992 for the subject ordinance. REQUEST: Staff recommends approval of the attached proposed ordinance. 13 BOOK h F�.GE -L BOOK Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien advised that this is the annual update of the fire codes and that Fire Chief Otis Humanes is here today to answer any questions. Chairman Eggert asked how we are coming with our false alarms, and Chief Humanes advised that we have had a reduction in the number of false alarms. However, we have not received payment of the fines for the last half of 1991 as yet. They are coming in slowly. Commissioner Bird asked what effect this has on business costs, but Chief Humanes didnIt feel there would be any cost. This just puts everybody on the same page working with the same codes. This provides architects and engineers with -�d[niform rules and regulations. Chairman Eggert opened the Public Hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed the Public Hearing. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 92-32, amending Section 401.04, Fire Prevention Codes and Standards to reflect current editions and supplements. 14 6/23/92( DOCS) Lagal(T F'U/ab) ORDINANCE 92-, AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 401.049 FIRE PREVENTION CODES AND STANDARDS TO REFLECT CURRENT EDITIONS AND SUPPLEMENTS. WHEREAS, the standard fire prevention codes and standards are updated from time to time, and WHEREAS, it is necessary to have these Codes of Indian River County revised to reflect these updated editions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. Paragraphs (1) , (2) and (3) of Section 401.04 are amended and a new paragraph (4) is added to read as follows: Section 401.04. Fire prevention codes and standards. (1) The National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA )1, 1987 edition and its supplement codes as set forth in Annex "A" to this chapter. (2) Uniform Fire Safety Rules and Standards for the state of Florida. (3) The National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Code 1991 edition. (4) The Standard Fire Prevention Code 1991 edition. SECTION 2. ANNEX "A" AMENDMENT. A new Annex "A" is added to Chapter 401, Building Codes as set forth in attachment one to the ordinance. Additions are indicated by underline. 15 AUG - 4 1992800K / F'H"E .L4, 1 ORDINANCE NO. 92 - SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall become effective on becoming law. Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, on this 4 day of August 1992. This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press - Journal on the 17 day of _ Jul y 1992, for a public hearing to be held on the 4 day of August 1992, at which time it was moved for adoption by Commissioner Bi rd and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bowman , and, adopted by the following vote: Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye Commissioner Gary C. Wheeler Resigned BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By . Carolyn Eggert C Attest by J arton Clerk Acknowledgment by the Department of State of the State of Florida, this 12th day of August—, 1992. Effective date: Acknowledgment for the Dement of State received on this 17th day of August , 1992, at l� . �O a.m. /p.m. and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida. Ina+'an RIM Co. Aforoved Dale Admin. e X217 Legal Budget —ZS Dept. Risk Mgr. 16 General Fire Protection NFPA 70 -1990, National Electrical Code NFPA 78 - 1989, Ughtning Protection Code NFPA 701 - 1989, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Flame Resistant Textiles and Films Occupancy Protection NFPA 32 - 1990, Standard for Dry Cleaning Plants NFPA 99 - 1990, Standard for Health Care Facilities ATTACHMENT NT ONE Annex A NFPA 327 - 1987, Standard Procedures for Cleaning or Safeguarding Small Tanks and Containers NFPA 385 - 1990, Standard for Tank Vehicles for Flammable and Combustible Uquids ' NFPA 386 - 1990, Standard for Portable Shipping Tanks for Flammable and Combustible Uquids NFPA 395 - 1988, Standard for Storage of Flammable and Combustible Uquids on Farms and Isolated Construction Projects Compressed and Uquefled Gases NFPA 101 -1991, Code for Safety to Ufe From Fire in Buildings and Structures NFPA 50 - 1990, Standard for Bulk Oxygen Systems at Consumer Sites NFPA 102 -1986, Standard for Assembly Seating, Tents, and Membrane Structures NFPA 50A -1989, Standard for Gaseous Hydrogen Systems at Consumer Sites NFPA 307 - 1990, Standard for the Construction and Protection of Marine NFPA 50B -1989, Standard for Uquefied Terminals, Piers, and Wharves Hydrogen Systems at Consumer Sites Flammable and Combustible Uquids NFPA 51A - C I nder Char 89, Standard for Acetylene Y ging Plants NFPA 30 - 1990, Flammable and Combustible Uquids Code NFPA 58 - 1989, Standard for the Storage and Handling of Uquefied NFPA 30A - 1990, Automotive and Petroleum Gases Marine Service Statio1-Code - _ NFPA 59 - 1990, -Standard for the NFPA 31 - 1987, Standard for the Installation of Oil Burning Equipment Storage and of Petroleum Gases at Utilit p Gas garuits NFPA 321 - 1991, Standard on Basic Classification NFPA 59A - 1985, the Production, Sto age, dd handling g of of Flammable and Combustible Uquids Uquefied Natural Gas (LNG) 17 AUG o 41992 MOK 67 PA.";E 12"1 Hazardous Materials and Processes NFPA 65 - 1987, Standard for the Processing and Finishing of Aluminum NFPA 33 - 1989, Standard for Spray Application Using Flammable and NFPA 481 - 1987, Standard for the Combustible Materials Production, Processing, Handling, and NFPA 34 - 1989, Standard for Dipping Storage of Titanium and Coating Processes Using Flammable NFPA 490 - 1986, Code for the Storage or Combustible Liquids of Ammonium Nitrate NFPA 35 -_ 1987, Standard for the- NFPA 495-�= � 1990, Code for the Manufacture of Organic Coatings Manufacture, Transportation, Storage, NFPA 36 - 1988, Standard for Solvent and Use of Explosive Materials Extraction Plants NFPA 654 - 1988, Standard for the Prevention of Fre and Dust Explosions in NFPA 40 - 1988, Standard for the the Chemical, Dye, Pharmaceutical, and Storage and Handling of Cellulose Nitrate Plastics Industry Motion Picture Film NFPA 40E - 1986, Code for the Storage NFPA m 1988, Stanard for the P ev ntio5n of Sulfur Fires and Explosions of Pyroxylin Plastic NFPA 43A - 1990, Code for the Storage NFPA 664 - 1987, Standard for the Prevention of Fre and Explosions in of Liquid and Solid Oxidizing Materials Wood Processing and Woodworking NFPA 51 -1987, Standard for the Design Facilities and Installation of Oxygen -Fuel Gas Systems for Welding, Cutting, NFPA 704 - 1990, Standard System for and Applied Processes the Identification of the Fre Hazards of Materials NFPA 51 B - 1989, Standard for Fire Transportation Prevention in Use of Cutting and Welding Processes NFPA 88A - 1991, Standard for Parking NFPA 61 B - 1989, Standard for the Structures Prevention of Fires and Explosions in NFPA 88B - 1991, Standard for Repair Grain Elevators and Facilities Handling Garages Bulk Raw Agricultural Commodities , Fire Protection NFPA 61 D - 1989, Standard for the NFPA - StandardOfor Pleasure and Commercial Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions in Motor Craft the Milling of Agricultural Commodities for Human Consumption NFPA 303 - 1990, Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards 18 Transportation (continued) NFPA 505 -1987, Firesafety Standard for Powered Industrial Trucks Including Type NFPA 306 - 1988, Standard for the Designations, Areas of Use, Control of Gas Hazards on Vessels Maintenance, and Operation NFPA 312 - 1990, Standard for Fire NFPA 513 - 1990, Standard for Motor Protection of Vessels During Freight Terminals Construction, Repair, and Lay-up Fire Extinguishing Systems NFPA 407 - 1990, Standard for Aircraft Fuel Servicing NFPA 11 - 1988, Standard for Low NFPA 408 - 1989, Standard on Aircraft Systems Expansion Foam and Combined Agent Hand Fire Extinguishers NFPA 11A - 1988, -Standard for Medium NFPA 409 - 1990, Standard on Aircraft and High Expansion' Foam Systems Hangars NFPA 415 - 1987, Standard on Aircraft NFPA 12 - 1989, Standard on Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems Fueling Ramp Drainage NFPA 416 - 1987, Standard on FPA 12A - 1301 Fre Extinguishing Systendard s Halon Systems Construction and Protection of Airport Terminal Buildings NFPA 12B - 1990, Standard on Halon NFPA 417 - 1990, Standard on 1211 Fire Extinguishing Systems Construction and Protection of Aircraft Loading Walkways NFPA 13 - 1991, Standard for the .- Installation of Sprinkler Systems NFPA 418 - 1990, Standard on Roof -top Heliport Construction and Protection NFPA 14 - 1990, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose NFPA 498 - 1990, Standard for Systems Explosives Motor Vehicle Terminals NFPA 15 - 1990, Standard for Water NFPA 501A - 1987, Standard for Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection Firesafety Criteria for Manufactured Home Installation, Sites and Communities NFPA 16 -. 1991, Standard on Deluge Foam -Water Sprinkler_, and Foam -Water NFPA 501C - 1990, Standard on Spray Systems Firesafety Criteria for Recreational Vehicles NFPA 17 - 1990, Standard for Dry Chemical Extinguishing Systems NFPA 501D - 1990, Standard for Firesafety Criteria for Recreational Vehicle NFPA 18, 1990 Standard on Wetting Parks and Campgrounds Agents 19 AUG m 4!-1992 Fire Extinguishing Systems (continued) NFPA 20 - 1990, Standard for the Installation of Centrifugal Fre Pumps NFPA 21 -1982, Standard Operation and Maintenance of National Standard Steam Fire Pumps NFPA 22 - 1987, Standard for Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection NFPA 24 - 1987, Standard for the Installation of Private Fre Service Mains and Their Appurtenances NFPA 26 - 1988, Recommended Practices for the Supervision of Valves Controlling Water Supplies for Fre Protection NFPA 1231 - 1989, Standard on Water Supplies for Suburban and Rural Fre Fighting NFPA 1961 - 1987, Standard on Fire Hose NFPA 1.962 - 1988, Standard for the Care, Use and Maintenance of Fre Hose including Connections and Nozzles NFPA 1963 - 1985, Standard for Screws Threads and Gaskets for Fre Hose Connections Portable Fire Extinguishers NFPA 10 - 1990, Standard for Portable Fre Extinguishers 20 BOOK d PACE;,. d Fire Warning Systems NFPA 71 - 1989, Standard for the Installation, Maintenance and Use of Signaling Systems for Central Station Service NFPA 72 -1990, Standard for Installation, Maintenance and Use of Protection Signaling Systems NFPA 72E -1990, Standard on Automatic Fre Detectors NFPA 72G - 1989, Standard for the Installation, Maintenance and Use of Notification Appliances for Protective Signaling Systems NFPA 72H - 1988, Guide for Testing Procedures for Local, Auxiliary, Remote Station and Proprietary Protective Signaling Systems NFPA 74 - 1989, Standard for the Installation, Maintenance and Use of Household Fire Warning Equipment NFPA 1221 - 1991, Standard for the Installation, Maintenance and Use of Public Fire Service - Communication Systems Storage NFPA 81 - 1986, Standard for Fur Storage, Fumigation and Cleaning NFPA 231 - 1990, Standard for General Storage NFPA 231C - 1991, Standard for Rack Storage of Materials NFPA 232 -1991, Standard for Protection of Records Building Construction and Facilities NFPA 37 - 1990, Standard for the Installation and Use of Stationary Combustion Engines and Gas Turbines NFPA 54 -1988, National Fuel Gas Code NFPA 69 - 1986, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems NFPA 75 - 1989, Standard for the Protection of Electronic Computer/Data Processing Equipment NFPA 79 - 1991, Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery NFPA 80 -1990, Standard for Fire Doors and Windows NFPA 82 - 1990, Standard on Incinerators, Waste and Linen Handling Systems and Equipment NFPA 85A - 1987, Standard for the Prevention of Furnace Explosions in Fuel Oil- and Natural Gas -Fired Single Burner Boiler -Furnaces NFPA 85B - 1989, Standard for Prevention of Furnace Explosions in Natural Gas -Fired Multiple Burner Boiler - Furnaces NFPA 85D - 1989, Standard for Prevention of Furnace Explosions in Fuel Oil -Fired Multiple Burner Boiler -Furnaces NFPA 86 -1990, Standard for Ovens and Furnaces NFPA BBC -1991, Standard for Industrial Furnaces Using a Special Processing Atmosphere 21 AUG ® 4 1992 NFPA 90A - 1989, Standard for the Installation of Air Conditioning and Ventilating Systems NFPA 90B - 1989, Standard for the Installation of Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning Systems NFPA 91 - 1990, Standard for the Installation of Blower and Exhaust Systems for Dust, Stock, Vapor Removal or Conveying NFPA 96 - 1991, Standard for the Installation of Equipment for the Removal of Smoke and Grease -Laden Vapors from Commercial Cooking Equipment NFPA 105 - 1989, Recommended Practice for the Installation of Smoke - and Draft -Control Door Assemblies NFPA 211 - 1988, Standard for Chimneys, Fireplaces, Vents, and Solid Fuel Burning Appliances NFPA 214 - 1988, Standard on Water - Cooling Towers NFPA 220 - 1985, Standard on Types of Building Construction NFPA 241 - 1989, Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations NFPA 251 - 1990, Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials NFPA 252 - 1990, Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Door Assemblies NFPA 255 - 1990, Method of Test of Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials NFPA 256 - 1987, Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Roof Coverings NFPA 257 -1990, Standard for Fire Tests of Window Assemblies NFPA 496 - 1989, Standard for Purged and Pressurized Enclosures for Electrical Equipment NFPA. 703 - 1985, Standard for Fire Retardant Impregnated Wood and Fire Retardant Coatings for Building Materials BOOK . F���t r PURCHASE OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILER - INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD PHASE IV The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/27/92: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.bf�`� J Public Works Director FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E. Capital Projects Manager SUBJECT: Purchase of Construction Trailer Indian River Boulevard Phase IV DATE: July 27, 1992 - FILE:-� trailer.agn DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Attached is a sales agreement for the purchase of a 10' x 36' mobile office trailer. This trailer is needed for the construction inspector during the construction. of Indian River Boulevard. When the construction of the Boulevard is completed, it will be used for the construction of 41st '.Street and 45th Street from US 1 to Indian River Boulevard and other future road construction projects. The following quotes for the purchase of a used office trailer were received: Acton Mobile Industries 10 x 36 (1985) $3,800 8 x 32 (1990) $5,400 Modulaire 10 x 36 ( 1983) $3,000 The air conditioner on the 1983 Modulaire was in better condition than the 1985 Acton. The total cost of the Modulaire delivered and installed on site is $3,465. Quotes were also solicited for fencing the trailer site as follows: Wood N. Nichols $5,850 Adron Fence $5,590 Betlar, Inc. $6,488 The fencing will consist of 8' chain link topped with three strands of barbed wire. The trailer site is located at the northwest corner of 45th Street and Indian River Boulevard. This site was acquired by the County from Grand Harbor for a proposed future fire station. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS Alternative No. 1 Approve purchase of a 10 x 36 trailer from Modulaire at the installed price of $3,465. 22 Alternative No. 2 Approve purchase of a 10 x 36 trailer from Modulaire for $31465 and installation of an 8 ft. chain link fence by Adron Fence Co. for $5,590. Alternative No. 3 Deny purchase of the trailer and fencing. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Alternative No. 2 is recommended. Funding Transportation Fund. is from the County Engineer Roger Cain presented staff's recommendation of Alternative #2. Chairman Eggert asked if we have the alternative of not providing a fence, and Mr. Cain advised that a fence will provide security for the trailer and can be used again on another project. Commissioner Bowman asked why we are running the fence over such a large piece of ground, and Mr. Cain advised that we are looking ahead to fencing the fire station. The contractor will provide his own trailer. This is for the County's purpose. Commissioner Scurlock emphasized that this is one of the reasons why he preferred to have the services of a full-time resident inspector provided by the contractor. He noted that our $50,000 savings is now down to $40,000, and he wondered if there are any other costs such as gas and car expenses that haven't been considered. OMB Director Joe Baird explained that he recommended that we buy the trailer and the fence so that we would have something to move to another project. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved Alternate #1, for the purchase of the trailer only, from Modulaire at the installed price of $3,465. COPY OF SALES AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 23 AUG - 4 1992 WK `3 'i'll 2 INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - PHASE III MOK The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/28/92: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.; Public Works Director() FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E , Capital Projects Manager SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard Phase III - Reduction of Retainage from 10% -to 5% DATE: July 28, 1992 FILE: retain.agn DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS' The contractor for Indian River Boulevard Phase III, Sheltra & Son Construction Co. Inc., has requested a reduction in retainage from 10% to 5%. As shown on the attached coversheet for Application for Payment No. 12, 5% retainage equates to $149,170.75. The only work that remains to be completed is the pavement markings and signs. The cost of this remaining work is $16,973.47. At the County's request, the Contractor is waiting for the asphalt to cure before placing pavement markings so that the asphalt cement doesn't bleed through the thermoplastic. Attached is a letter from Boyle Engineering recommending that the retainage be reduced to 5%. A consent from the Contractor's surety to reduce the retainage to 5% is also attached. Indian River Boulevard from Royal Palm to 37th Street is scheduled to open Saturday, August 22nd following ribbon cutting ceremonies and a walk/run that is being organized by the Recreation Department. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends the following actions be taken: 1. Approve reduction of retainage from 10% to 5%. 2. Approve the release of final payment and remaining 5% retainage upon completion of all contract items and obligations to the satisfaction of the County and Boyle Engineering. The final application for payment will be accompanied by releases or waivers of all liens and all documentation called for in the Contract Documents. Funding from Account No. 309-214-541-066.51, Indian River Boulevard Phase III- Construction in Progress. 24 M ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved staff's recommendation as set out in the above memo. INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - PHASE III - CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/22/92: TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator Com. THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E., . Public Works Director`kr' i FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E. Capital Projects Manager SUBJECT: Indian River Boulevard Phase III Change Order No. 9 DATE: July 22, 1992 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS FILE: irbco9.agn The attached Change Order No. 9 includes increases to the contract amount for the following work: Installation of conduit for future streetlighting. This item will be billed to the City of Vero Beach. Construction of an access road to the impoundment pump station that will be operated by the Mosquito Control District. Construction of a .5 acre mitigation area required by the St. Johns River Water Management District. Widening of Barber Avenue from two lanes to three lanes at entrance to Indian River Boulevard to accommodate the future widening of,,. -Barber -Avenue from US 1 to Indian River Boulevard. - Additional sod to prevent erosion into adjacent wetlands. Replacement of sidewalks at Eye Institute in order to reduce width and raise elevation. Construction of a right turn lane at south end of frontage road to improve access and traffic flow. The remaining increases and decreases on Change Order No. 9 are items that adjust contract quantities to actual quantities of work performed. No additional Change Orders to this contract are anticipated. 25 BOOK AUG o 41992 U G BOOK F-uE tie` The total net change in contract price for Change Order No. 9 is an increase in the amount of $43,853.17. The new contract amount of $3,000,388.41 is $599,582 below the estimated budget and $353,756 below the bid amount submitted by the second lowest bidder on the original bid. ALTERNATIVES AND ANALy$IS Alternative No. 1 Authorize Change Order No. 9 Alternative No. 2 Deny Change Order No. 9 and re -negotiate. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. Funding Mis from Account 309-214-541-066.51, Indian River Boulevard Phase III, Construction in Progress. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved Change Order No. 9 with Sheltra ,& Son Construction Co, Inc., as set out in the above staff recommendation. CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD REQUEST FOR BLOCK PARTY-- PARADISE PARR The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/27/92: ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: James Chandler County Administrator n THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: Michael S. Dudeck, P.] County Traffic Engine_ X4 , 91 / /,V FA SUBJECT: Request for Block Party Paradise Park 86th Drive between 24th Street and 26th Street DATE: July 27, 1992 ----------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS The residents of Paradise Park are requesting permission to have a "Block Party" for their Neighborhood Crime Watch Program. The event is scheduled for August 16, 1992 starting at 12:00 noon 26 � � r till 9:00 P.M. The request is to block vehicular traffic on 86th Drive between 24th and 26th Streets. Staff has no objection to this request, provided that: 1. Representative(s) contact Mr. Bruce Haas at the Traffic Engineering Division at 569-5143 seventy-two (72) hours prior to the event. Proper barricades, furnished by the Traffic Engineering Division, are installed by the Celebration representative(s) and returned by the Celebration representatives) seventy-two (72) hours after the event. 2. A representative be listed as a contact person in charge of the event in case the road needs to be opened. 3. Access to emergency vehicles be maintained. RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING Staff recommends approval. No funding is applicable. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved the request to close 86th Drive between 24th Street and 26th Street in Paradise Park for the purpose of a block party to be held August 16, 1992, as set out in the above staff recommendation. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT - 49TH STREET TO GIFFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT - WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 4 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/27/92: DATE: JULY 27, 1992 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: 7IRECTIR E G. PINTO OF UTILI VICES STAFFED AND PREPARED BY: - ER, P.E. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER I)EPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT - 49TH STREET TO GIFFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -88 -07 -SL IRC BID NO. 91-113 WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 4 BACKGROUND: Installation of approximately 1,050 linear feet of 8" ductile iron pipe water main is required to provide adequate fire protection for the subject facility. It was originally intended to provide this installation with the future wastewater treatment plant expansion, but that expansion project has been rescheduled for a later date. 27 AUG ®4 199 BOOK On August 6, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners approved the award of the Labor Contract bid to Driveways, Inc. (Bid No. 91-113). (See attached minutes.) The Department of Utility Services proposes to use this Labor Contract to replace the distribution system. ANALYSIS: The cost of the labor to replace the 4" water line with new 8" ductile iron pipe under the Labor Contract is $11,307.34 (see attached Work Authorization No. 4 with Driveways, Inc.). The pipe, valves, and fittings will be supplied by the County at a cost of $12,107.70. In-house engineering, inspection, and administrative costs are estimated to be $1,500.00. The replacement of this line will increase the pressure to accommodate fire hydrant protection at the Gifford Wastewater Treatment Plant and supply water to the new Gifford Sludge Facility. RECOMMENDATION: _ The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Authorization No. 4 with Driveways, Inc., for the amount of $11,307.34 to replace the water distribution system and to authorize expenditure of $13,607.70 for material and in-house support as stated above. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved Work Authorization No. 4 with Driveways, Inc. in the amount of $11,307.34 to replace the water distribution system and to authorize expenditure of $13,607.70 for material and in-house support as set out in the above staff recommendation. WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 4 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD ROCKRIDGE TREE REMOVALS The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/27/92: DATE: JULY 27, 1992 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRA FROM: TERRANCE G PINT DIRECTOR O a S PREPARED H. D. " AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: ROCKRIDGE TREE REMOVALS BACKGROUND During replacement of the galvanized water lines in Rockridge Subdivision, some of the water mains that existed at the rear of the 28 residential properties needed to be relocated to the front of the properties facing the road right-of-way. The water main behind the homes on 4th Court (on the west side of the properties) between 13th Street and 14th Street is in a utility easement that was heavily forested and thick with underbrush. This line was moved to the front of the homes. However, we must continue to utilize the easement for wastewater main and electric control lines. ANALYSIS The trees are growing in an Indian River County easement. Many of the trees and some limbs of other trees are dead, and are potentially hazardous, especially with the electric lines running through the trees. For safety of life and property, it is desired to remove the trees. We have limited working in the easement to emergencies only until the area can be made safe. RECOMMENDATION The Department of Utility Services requests authorization to enter into an agreement with the low bidder, A-1 Tree Service of Ft. Pierce, for removal of the trees at a cost of $14,675.00 (see attached). Aerial power lines are in place within the easement. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, that the Board enter into an agreement with the low bidder, A-1 Tree Service of Ft. Pierce, for removal of the trees at a cost of $14,675.00, as set out in the above staff recommendation. Under discussion, Commissioner Scurlock raised the concern of setting a precedent for the County to remove large dead trees in easements, but Utilities Director Terry Pinto assured him that we would not be setting a precedent. Chairman Eggert understood that it would be only in the cases where it endangers the utilities, and Administrator Chandler confirmed that is what we are doing in this case. Director Pinto explained that we have exhausted every possibility of getting the City of Vero Beach to accept responsibility for these lines in this area. They won't address it and the County is faced with footing the entire cost. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the County's policy and whether we should pursue the matter with the City of Vero Beach as to their part of the responsibility in utility easements. Director Pinto felt it is absolutely absurd that the City has let this go on for so long. but it is the County's utility easement and the City has a permit to use all of those easements in Rockridge. 29 AUG ® 4 1992 BOOK A [AuL24 r Attorney Vitunac suggested that we request the City to pay one half of the $14,675. He noted that the City received a bid for $60,000 for the job, but Director Pinto went out on his own and got a bid for $14,675. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion to approve the removal of the trees at a cost of $14,675 and, after the work is finished, present a request to the City to participate in paying half of that cost, was carried unanimously. SLUDGE/SEPTAGE FACILITY - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 --- The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/24/92: DATE: 'JULY 24, 1992 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO IRECYOR OF UTILITY SERVICES AND •. PREPARED BY: QT�ER,STAFFED H. D.' UKE P. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: SLUDGE/SEPTAGE FACILITY CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 BACKGROUND: During review of the site plans for the subject project, certain revisions to paving, drainage, and fencing were found to Ke required by the County's Planning and Engineering Departments. In order to meet these requirements, the following changes are proposed: 1. Approximately 100 linear feet of opaque. slats is to be furnished and installed within the existing perimeter fence. 2. Drainage at the 49th Street entranceway is to be modified -and a junction box installed. 3. The entrance roadway is to be paved. 4. In addition to the above, it was determined that a new entrance gate was needed. ANALYSIS• Due to the time restraint on the subject project, it was decided to advertise for award while the plans,were in site plan review. When the required changes became known, it would have been difficult to revise the construction plans without delay of the project, so it was decided to incorporate the modifications by change order. RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the foregoing changes at the proposed cost of $44,068.00. This cost is valid if the approved change order is received by Poole & Kent no later than August 13, 1992. 30 Commissioner Scurlock assumed that all these changes have been mandated by the State and were not included in the regular contract and now are up for approval through a change order. He asked why we didn't know this road had to be paved before it came through the County's site plan application process. Utilities Director Terry Pinto explained that this entire project had to go through the Environmental Protection Agency before it was submitted to the County for site plan approval. Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that Items #3 and #4 are things that should be determined very early on. He stressed that this is exactly what is happening in our county when people endeavor to build something or expand their existing buildings. Director Pinto reiterated that this is the process that must be followed. Federally funded projects are very difficult and sometimes there is no alternative in handling the change order process. He didn't feel there was a problem with the site plan in this specific case. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved Change Order No. 1 with The Poole & Kent Co. in the amount of $44,068.00, as set out in the above staff recommendation. CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITMENT - DEEP INJECTION WELL The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/1/92: DATE: "JULY 1, 1992 TO: QTAMS E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES PREPARED ROBERT.O. WISEMEN, P.E. AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SUBJECT: FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY O01ITl�NT DEEP INJECTION WELL INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. IIS -91 -01 -ED P;- A44 �l On September 24, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners approved the professional services agreement between Indian River County and 31 AUG ® 4 1992 BOOK Ori I rd� CH2M Hill, Inc., Deerfield Beach, Florida, for the design, permitting, b�ddinqq, and resident engineering inspection services for a deep injection well at the proposed location on the County landfill property (see attachment). ANALYSIS Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 17-28.27(9) of the Florida Administrative Code, the DER may order a well plugged if it is determined that there is a threat to the waters of the State. The permit shall require the permittee to maintain financial' responsibility and resources, in the form of performance bonds or another equivalent form of financial assurance approved by the Department of Environmental Regulation to close; plug, and abandon the underground injection operation in a manner prescribed by the DER. The current plugging and abandonment cLost is estimated at $291,050.00. This cost shall be reviewed on an annual basis, and this obligation shall incorporate accumulated inflation costs. RECOMiU MON The Department of Utility Services recommends the acknowledgment and approval of the Certification of Financial Responsibility as attached, which must be submitted to the Department of Environmental Regulation as a requirement to the issuance of the subject construction and operation well permit. Commissioner Bird asked if this money has to -be put up in the form of a bond or something, and Utilities Director Terry Pinto advised that it does not. We just have to prove that;we have the ability. Commissioner Bird understood then that it is not a cash requirement at this time and that money does not have to be escrowed or anything else at this time. Commissioner Scurlock explained that what we are doing here, basically, is pledging the full resources of the county's taxpayers if this ever has to undergo a major cleanup. We are guaranteeing that we will tax the citizens of Indian River County to pay for it, whatever the cost. Commissioner Bowman pointed out that it would not be a cleanup, it would be plugging it and saying goodbye to it forever. Director Pinto pointed out that we do this very same thing every time we build a wastewater treatment plant, landfill, etc. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board by a 3-1 vote (Commissioner Bowman dissenting) acknowledged and approved the Certification of Financial Responsibility, as set out in the above staff recommendation. CERTIFICATION IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD 32 � r � EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE TO THE AREA WEST OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL ON COUNTY ROAD 512 The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/29/92: DATE: JULY 29, 1992 TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO DIRECTOR OF UTI T RVICES SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF WATER SERVICE TO THE AREA WEST OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOL ON -COUNTY ROAD 512 BACKGROUND The County Commission previously approved the construction of water and sewer lines to serve the new high school on County Road 510 and the middle school on County Road 512. That project will be under construction within the next 60 days. There is some interest to extend both water and sewer lines west of the middle school on County Road 512 to Interstate 95. be master lines funded from impact fees. Their rimary p lines would would be to service the industrial area on County Road 510,utheSeWayfara Restaurant, and Sunshine Travel Park. Sunshine Travel Park presently has a franchise which required a letter of credit to pay $363,280.00 for impact fees. ANALYSIS The Utilities Department will have the water main extension to the schools under construction within 60 days. All the engineering was completed in-house. We contracted out only the surveying. Utilities expansion into that area would promote growth of the industrial area and also make utilities available so three package treatment plants could be eliminated. 102nd Terrace which runs north from County Road 512 into the industrial zone could be served by an assessment project. RECOMMENDATION The Department of Utility Services re estsCommission for authorization of engineerin aforoval thefdesign County extension of the utility lines from County Road 512 to Interstatef95tto be funded by an assessment, and design of utility lines for 102nd Terrace to be funded by impact fees. Both projects are to be brought back to the Board after design with the final cost estimate for authorization to bid. 33 BOOK 8'1 [Aa boa I F'A�E ►:rc Chairman Eggert noted that there is a correction in the wording of the Recommendation on this item. The next to the last line in the first paragraph of the Recommendation should read, "utility lines from CR -512 to I-95 to be funded by an impact fee and the design of utility lines for 102nd Terrace to be by assessment." Commissioner Scurlock understood that as a result of this extension, HETRA and Wayfara Restaurant would have to phase out their water systems and hook up, and the Sunshine Travel Park will have to phase out their system and we will call on their letter of credit. He asked if all those people would be asked to hook into the public sewer system. - ---� Utilities Director Terry Pinto responded that certainly the franchise would be forced to hook up. The others depend on whether or not we decide to do the assessment process to take the line back to the HETRA area since that would be handled separately. If we do, they would be connecting. He explained that the DER has been after us to get wastewater service out to Wayfara Restaurant for six years because they have a wastewater treatment plant that has been a real problem. Sunshine Travel Park has a franchise. In addition there is the possibility of the industrial park which could be a very good customer, particularly with regard to water. Commissioner Scurlock asked if there is any project on the drawing board that would compete with this one for available funds, but Director Pinto felt the only one that he could think of is Oslo Road and taking those lines from the Landfill to I-95. However, there is no pot of gold at the end of that such as there is here, which makes a big difference. Commissioner Scurlock felt these were important questions to ask, and Director Pinto advised that this would get top priority because of the anticipated recovery. We entered into a contract with the school whereby they prepaid all of their impact fees and we took over the operation of the little treatment plant at the middle school. Staff is asking for approval to design the project in-house and bring it back with some real hard numbers. Chairman Eggert felt this corridor has a lot of pressure on it with the school going up out there and the potential of the industrial park. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously authorized the engineering for the design of the extension of the utility lines from CR -512 to I-95, which is to be funded by an impact fee as noted in the correction in staff's recommendation. 34 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES - FINANCE ADMINISTRATION POLICY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/27/92: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS eLtL��� FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney DATE: July 27, 1992 RE: FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION POLICY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE I have been invited to serve as a member of the technical advisory committee of the 1992-93 FAC Finance & Administration Policy Develop- ment Committee and request direction from the Board whether the Board would like me to accept the invitation. Being a member would require that I attend the committee meetings, which, as indicated in the attached letter, will be October 12 in Orlando, November 9 in Tampa, and early December in Ponte Vedra Beach. The purpose of the committee is to develop legislation to be presented by FAC each year to the Legislature, and the membership would pro- vide an opportunity for the County to have input in drafting legislation of interest to Indian River County. ACTION REQUESTED: Request direction from the Board whether to join as a member of this committee. ON MOTION by Commissioner Commissioner Bird, the Board Attorney ..�Pitunac I s serving technical advisory committee Finance & Administration Committee. 35 AUG o J992 Bowman, SECONDED by unanimously approved is a member of -the the of the 1992-93 FAC Policy Development r HDOK IAa'43, BUSINESS INCENTIVES The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/24/92: TO: Board of County DATE. July 24, 1992 FILE: Commissioners SUBJECT: Business Incentives FROM: Carolyn K. Eggert REFERENCES: County Commission Chairman As the Economic Development Council rewrites -our Overall Economic Development Plan and as I talk with the Council of 100 and various business people in Indian River County, concern about our economy, increasing the tax base by attracting commerce here and the use of tax and other business incentives have been "hot" topics. I would appreciate our having a general discussion of business incentives and their application to this County. Please note the tax incentive referendum to be placed on St. Lucie County's ballot this November and the attached law. Chairman Eggert remained very frustrated about this county not being able to get grants from the State. Commissioner Scurlock felt we have to be extremely careful in structuring the use of tax and other business incentives. He felt the most significant thing the County can do is rethink and readdress our permitting requirements. He strongly suggested that we streamline many of our requirements which are making it financially infeasible for people to develop their projects. Commissioner Bird agreed because he felt our economical climate needs a shot in the arm more than at any time he has seen in this county. Keeping our county beautiful is important, but maybe we have been carried away. He felt we need extra help from perhaps the Council of 100, etc. to find out what other counties are doing and bring back to the Board a shopping list of things that have worked. Commissioner Bird felt that impact fees make sense in that they pay for growth, but he also felt there needs to be a way of phasing these impact fees into projects. 36 M Commissioner Bowman wanted to see us check into industrial revenue bonds, and OMB Director Joe Baird believed IRBs could be used for infrastructure. Attorney Vitunac believed that federal law specifically forbids the bonds being used for water and sewer. Commissioner Bird asked if there was a difference between the Economic Development Council and the Council of 100, and Chairman Eggert explained that the EDC sets goals for the community and that type of thing and works with several organizations, one being the Council of 100, trying to improve the business climate. Peter Robinson, president of Council of 100, felt the Council of 100 and the Economic Development Council complement each other. One is out talking to people and one is making things happen that will attract people to this area. He suggested that we address whether there is going to be any tax abatements because for that you need a referendum. Commissioner Scurlock emphasized that drawing up those guidelines is an extensive process. He still felt that the biggest thing is not to collect the impact fees at the beginning of the project. Herndon Williams, past president of the IRC Board of Realtors, felt it is very refreshing to hear these suggestions. He believed the Council of 100 is really getting with it and he sees momentum gathering. He also believed that if the Commissions sets the pace, the community will follow that pace. Chairman Eggert sensed a real change of attitude in the community in that people realize that commercial is needed. Ed Schlitt, local realtor, hated to see developers take their projects to the north and south of us because of the high cost of getting a development started in this county. When developers come in with their plans, some county planners seem to overburden them._, with the- facts of requirements -rather than concentrating on how they can make this happen. The reception is better in other counties. Chairman Eggert pointed out that for the last 4-5 months, we have been making a great effort to make people aware of a free pre - application meeting, and Planning Director Stan Boling is acting as the coordinator in that effort. Administrator Chandler added that we also need the cooperation of the developers in doing their homework up front. Herndon Williams and Peter Robinson felt that the Council of 100 could really be of help in this effort and said they would be delighted to get with Stan Boling to see what can be done to get information out to the community. 37 AUG m4N92 i' � Chairman Eggert returned the conversation to the suggestions for tax incentives, particularly the possibility of a tax abatement. Ron Ewing, president of Vista Properties, emphasized that the payment of impact fees up front is prohibitive to building developments such as Vista Plantation, etc. He referred to a list of impact fees collected by other counties in Florida and noted that 76% of them are collected at the time the building permit is issued and that another 5% is collected at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. He suggested that we create a pool of money through an ad valorem tax and use that money to put in the required infrastructure. He stressed that yeu can't expect a developer to pay for the cost of paving miles of.roads. Commissioner Scurlock advised that he proposed to the Commission six months ago that we issue debt and get a large pool of funds available so that you could defer payment, but staff was skeptical. He urged the Board to readdress that concept, and noted that he still has all the numbers. OMB Director Joe Baird differed with Mr. Ewing's theory because the County currently offers a payment plan on impact fees. In summary, Chairman Eggert noted that we have identified a number of areas where we recognize the need for specific solutions to be brought back to the Board for consideration: 1) Impact fee phasing 2) Bond approach 3) Excessive regulations 4) Technical Review Committee approach 5) Concurrency requirements and working with the State and the DOT 6) Industrial Revenue Bonds 7) Specific specifications concerning what is really an economical ad valorem tax exemption 8) A pool of funds as Commissioner Scurlock suggested Chairman Eggert thanked everyone for coming and giving their comments. 38 APPOINTMENTS TO FORMER COMMISSIONER WHEELER'S COMMITTEES The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/24/92: TO: Board of County DATE. July 24, 1992 FILE: Commissioners SUBJECT: wheeler Committees FROM: Carolyn R. Eggert Cf-' REFERENCES: County Commission Chairman The following committees have been chaired by Gary Wheeler. Some will need a chairman appointed before January: 1. Solid Waste Disposal District - Dick Bird currently vice chairman. He would move to chairman and a new vice chairman elected. 2. MANWAC 3. Tourist Development Council The following committees do not need a new chairman before January. 1. Historic Resources Advisory Committee 2. Beach Restoration & Preservation Committee 3. Medical Examiner Budget Committee 4. Court Administration Budget Committee 5. 19th Judicial Circuit Conflict Committee 6. Alternate for Bowman - Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. The Board appointed Commissioner Bird as Chairman and Commissioner Bowman as Vice Chairman of the Solid Waste Disposal District. The Board also appointed Commissioner Bird as Chairman of MANWAC and of the Tourist Development Committee. 39 MOO AUG ® 4 1992 . i BOOK 8 7 f, 6, RESOLUTION SUPPORTING DESIGNATION OF THE PORT OF FORT PIERCE AS A "PORT OF ENTRY" The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/7/92: sero beach- indLan rive] coty ty chamber of .ommerce 1216 21ST STREET P.O. BOX 2947 July 7, 1992 i �S! B� 1 J At- �Oy��S�GN;t4D .r a � ► �'E %v/ S, 'PJ' .• y VERO BEACH, FL 32961 Mrs Carolyn Eggert, Chairman Indian River County Commission 1840 -25th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Commissioner Eggert: - 407=-567-3491 FAX: 407-778-3181 rIgUT10N LIST CIST,► ,:: �:::: rs C� r COM - other Other The Chamber of Commerce and Council of 100 are working with the St.Lucie County Economic Development Council to secure designation for the Port of Fort Pierce as a 'Port of Entry." This designation will bring the Port of/Fort Pierce in line with the other eleven ports in Florida which have been designated as • Ports of Entry. • The Port of Fort Pierce has the capabilities, in the future, of creating additional jobs for the residents of Indian River County, and assisting in the shipping and receiving of goods and services by Indian River County businesses and industries. Should the Port of Fort Pierce receive the designation, the next step would be to apply for an "Industrial Trade Free Zone,` of which a part could be located in Indian River County. We are requesting that the County Commission adopt a resolution supporting the designation of the Port of Fort Pierce as a 'Port of Entry. • A sample resolution is enclosed for your review. Your support is sincerely appreciated. Cordially, E ecut e R 40 Commissioner Bowman was opposed to supporting the designation because of the dredging that would take place making it an environmental disaster, but Commissioner Bird believed it was going to be scrutinized to the hilt before it would be designated. ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Commissioner Bird, the Board by a vote of 3-1, Commissioner Bowman dissenting, adopted Resolution 92-135, supporting the St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority's application for designation as a U.S. Customs Port of Entry. RESOLUTION NO. 92-135 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IN SUPPORT OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY PORT AND AIRPORT AUTHORITY'S APPLICATION FOR DESIGNATION AS A U.S. CUSTOMS PORT OF ENTRY; PROVIDING FOR DISTRIBUTION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Port of Fort Pierce was created in 1921 and has been operating as a deepwater port maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers since 1935, and the St. Lucie County International Airport, originally opened prior to the Second World War, has been handling international cargo and passengers for almost 20 years; and WHEREAS, the Port of Fort Pierce is one of the 12 deepwater ports in Florida designated by Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Airport is currently in the process of a $25 million land acquisition program and a Development of Regional Impact analysis for future expansion, and the Port of Fort Pierce has recently won Florida's Congressional Delegation and the Governor's endorsements for a proposed $9 million Federal deepening project and $37 million local expansion program to Aevelop a publicly owned port facility; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Bureau of Customs has operated a full-time Customs Station at the St. Lucie County International -Airport since 1980 serving the import and export needs of the airport and port; and WHEREAS, the -four county region produces 90% of Florida's fresh fruit, citrus by-products and other agricultural commodities exported to the Bahamas, Europe and the Far East; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: SECTION 1: This body does hereby offer its full and complete support to the application by St. Lucie County to be designated a U.S. Custom's Port of Entry so that it may better serve the residents, visitors and businesses in the Treasure Coast area, including Indian River County. 41 AUG o 41992 BOOK 8'J dr BOOK t d IA6E �1J1 SECTION 2: That a copy of this resolution will be forwarded to all appropriate local, state and Federal agencies and officials. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Scurlock who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bird and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Carolyn R. Eggert Aye Vice Chairman Margaret C. Bowman Nay Commissioner Richard B. Bird Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye District 4 - Vacant The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this 4th day of August, 1992. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA s BY -- Attest: -V Carol4yzr R. Egge Chairman _J..,R. Barton, Cle B�2) �� 7 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT Withdrawn There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded and carried, the Board adjourned at 11:35 o'clock A.M. ATTEST: . Barton, Clerk Caroly K. Eggert C airman 42