Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-147RESOLUTION NO. 91-JA1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN OPPOSITION TO HOUSE BILL 2251 DEALING WITH POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND CAMPAIGN FINANCING. WHEREAS, House Bill 2251 as passed by the 1991 Florida Legislature makes provision for a 10 assessment on contributions made to political committees and on candidate filing fees, and provides for the 10 assessment to be deposited into the Election Campaign Financing Trust Fund which funds the races of the Governor and Cabinet; and WHEREAS, such assessment interferes with freedom of speech rights guaranteed under Section 4 of Article I of the Florida State Constitution; and WHEREAS, such an assessment compromises rights of association and free speech guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution; and WHEREAS, the stated intent of depositing funds in tho Election Campaign Financing Trust Fund is to limit total expenditures in campaigns for Governor, Lieutenant Governor and Cabinet, by only allowing those candidates who limit their expenditures to obtain funding from said special assessments; and WHEREAS, this act does not accomplish its intended goals since if any candidate exceeds the spending limits then all candidates are released from the spending limits, regardless of the acceptance of financing funded by said special assessments, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. We are opposed to the mandatory 10 assessment for the purpose of financing gubernatorial and Cabinet campaigns. 2. We support the efforts of the Republican Party of Florida to challenge these provisions of House Bill 2251. 3. We object to the attempt to shift political power and resources from the local level to the state, by redistributing local 1 political contributions to and for the benefit of the Governor and Cabinet, while at the same time diluting the political process and impinging on the ability of local candidates and committees to put forth their message to the electorate. 4. We object to House Bill 2251's attempts to limit campaign expenditures as inconsistent with the U.S. Supreme Court holding in Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, wherein the Court held: "A restriction on the amount of money a person or group can spend on political communication during a campaign necessarily reduces the quantity of expression by restricting the number of issues discussed, the depth of their exploration, and the size of the audience reached. This is because virtually every means of communicating in today's mass society requires the expenditure of money." The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Scurlock and seconded by Commissioner Wheeler , and, being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Richard N. Bird A1►e Vice Chairman Gary C. Wheeler A rhe Commissioner Margaret C. Bowman Aye Commissioner Don C. Scurlock, Jr. Aye Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 17 day of September , 1991. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: • Je K.:lBart4n, ' Clerk By: 2 Richard N. Bird, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY WILLIAM G. COLLINS II ASST. COUNTY ATTORNEY