Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05/23/2017 (2)
��vEgc� G� COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2017 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman, District 2 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Peter D. O'Bryan, Vice Chairman, District 4 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Susan Adams, District 1 Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Bob Solari, District 5 Tim Zorc, District 3 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2.11. INVOCATION Russ Graves, Engineer Fire -Medic, Station 5, Indian River County Fire/Rescue Division 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Susan Adams 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA / EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Presentation of Proclamation and Retirement Award Honoring Richard M. Vaughn on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Public Works/Road and Bridge Division with Thirty -Two Years of Service 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REOUIRING BOARD ACTION 7.A. Florida Public Service Commission Order No. PSC -17 -0166 -PCO -EI In re: Petition for approval of revised underground distribution tariffs, by Duke Energy Florida, Inc., is available for review in the office of the Clerk to the Board. May 23, 2017 Page 1 of 4 7.B. Proclamation and Retirement Award Honoring Kernie D. Fuller on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Community Development/Building Division with Twenty -Five Years of Service 7.C. Proclamation and Retirement Award Honoring Christopher D. Thomas on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Emergency Services/Fire Rescue Division with Twenty -Seven Years of Service 8. CONSENT AGENDA 8.A. Checks and Electronic Payments May 5, 2017 to May 11, 201, 7 8.B. Quarterly Tourist Development Tax Report for the Quarter Ending 03/31/17 8.C. Letter of Support for McKee Jungle Garden 8.D. Out of County Travel to Attend Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association Annual Conference 8.E. Declaration of Excess Equipment as Surplus for Sale or Disposal 8.F. Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 16 8.G. FDOT Local Agency Program (LAP) Supplemental Agreement No. 1 and Resolution Authorizing the Chairman's Signature 8th Street Sidewalk Improvements (58th Avenue to 21 st Court) 8.H. Award of RFQ No. 2016016 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Project 8.I. Rejection of Bids 2017042 and 2017043 8.1 Extension of Lease and Agreed Notice to Vacate Property - Mermaid Carwash: 1935 43rd Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10.A.1. Robert Pritchett's Request for Abandonment of a Right -of -Way for a 16 Foot Wide Alley Running from 129th Court to 129th Street and Lying Immediately Adjacent and Contiguous to Lots 1-10, Block 18 of the Townsite Plat of Roseland Subdivision [ROWA-17-06-03 / 2017030030-78850] (Legislative) B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development May 23, 2017 Page 2 of 4 May 23, 2017 Page 3 of 4 B. Emergency Services C. General Services 1. Human Services 2. Sandridge Golf Club 3. Recreation D. Human Resources E. Office of Management and Budget F. Public Works G. Utilities Services 12.G.1. Septic Hauler Agreement for the Residuals Dewatering (Biosolids) Facility 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman B. Commissioner Peter D. O'Brvan. Vice Chairman C. Commissioner Susan Adams D. Commissioner Bob Solari E. Commissioner Tim Zorc 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District B. Solid Waste Disposal District C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT May 23, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircg_ov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00p.m. until Wednesday at 6.00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. until 5: 00 p.m., Thursday at 1: 00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00p. m. May 23, 2017 Page 4 of 4 HONORING RICHARD M. VA UGHN ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSIROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION WHEREAS, Richard M. Vaughn retired from Indian River County Road & Bridge Division, effective May 31, 2017, and WHEREAS, Richard M. Vaughn was originally hired on October 17, 1983 with Road & Bridge and ended his employment on August 9, 1985. He was rehired on January 13, 1986 as a Maintenance Worker. In February 1986, Richard was promoted to Foreman L On August 22, 1997, Richard was promoted to Drainage Manager and in May 2009, he was moved into the Vegetation Foreman position and continued in that capacity until his retirement, and WHEREAS, Richard M. Vaughn has served this County and the Public with distinction .and selflessness. During his thirty-two years of service, he was dedicated, and his work was greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens, and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Richard M. Vaughn's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last thirty-two years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors! Adopted this 23rd day of May 2017. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA i r l j 1 Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman P1 2liis is to certify that f°chard 9W. Vaughn is here6y presented this lftirement Award for outstanding performance and faithfuf service to Indian Vver County hoard of County Commissioners 'For thirty-two years of service On this 31st day ofMay 2017 4&hardB. Szpyrlp ahift-tor of ft 6Gc'Wo* Joseph E. Tfacher Board of County Commissioner, Chairman P2 ILEMAY :11—,2-0-17--`1 OCUMENT NO. 04777-.17 11 ER C;C:OMMISSI.ON AERK? BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In re: Petition for approval of revised DOCKET NO. 170069 -EI underground residential distribution tariffs, byORDER NO. PSC -17 -0166 -PCO -EI Duke Energy Florida, Inc. ISSUED: May 11, 2017 The following Commissioners participated in the disposition of this matter: JULIE I. BROWN, Chairman ART GRAHAM RONALD A. BRIS$ JIMMY PATRONIS DONALD J. POLMANN ORDER SUSPENDING DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC'S PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF REVISED UNDERGROUND RESIDENTIAL DISTRIBUTION TARIFF SHEETS BY THE COMMISSION: Background On March 30, 2017, Duke Energy Florida, LLC (Duke) filed a petition for approval of its revised underground residential distribution (URD) tariffs. URD tariffs reflect the additional costs Duke incurs to provide underground distribution service in place of overhead service, and are paid by the customer as a contribution -in -aid -of -construction. Duke's current charges were approved in Order No. PSC- 14-0396-TRF-EI.1 This Order suspends the proposed tariff -revisions. We have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Section 366.06, Florida Statutes (F.S.). Decision The tariffs shall be suspended to allow Commission staff sufficient time to review the petition and gather all pertinent information in order to present this Commission with an informed recommendation on the tariff proposals. Pursuant to Section 366.06(3), F.S., this Commission may withhold consent to the operation of all or any portion of a new rate schedule, delivering to the utility requesting such increase a reason or written statement of good cause for doing so within 60 days. We find that the reason stated above is good cause consistent with the requirement of Section 366.06(3), F.S. 1 Order No. PSC -14 -0396 -TRF -EI, issued July 31, 2014, in Docket No. 140067-E1, In re: Petition for approval of revised underground distribution tariffs. by Duke Energy Florida, Inc. 3 ORDER NO. PSC -17 -0166 -PCO -El DOCKET NO. 170069 -El PAGE 2 Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED by the Florida Public Service Commission that Duke Energy Florida, LLC's ,proposed revised underground residential distribution tariffs are suspended pending further review. It is further ORDERED that this docket shall remain open pending. this Commission's decision on the proposed tariff revisions. MAD By ORDER of the Florida Public Service Commission this 11 th day of May, 2017. HONG YANG V Chief Deputy Commission Clerk Florida Public Service Commission 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 (850)413-6770 w",w.floridapse.com Copies furnished: A copy of this document is provided to the parties of record at the time of issuance and, if applicable, interested persons. - - - -- - - ---- 4 ORDER NO, PSC -17 -0166 -PCO -EI DOCKET NO. 170069 -EI PAGE NOTICE OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OR JUDICIAL REVIEW The Florida Public Service Commission is required by Section 120.569(1), Florida Statutes, to notify parties of any administrative hearing or judicial review of Commission orders that is available under Sections 120.57 or 120.68, Florida Statutes, as well as the procedures and time limits that apply. This notice should not be construed to mean all requests for an administrative hearing or judicial review will be granted or result in the relief sought. Mediation may be available on a case-by-case basis. If mediation is conducted, it does not affect a substantially interested person's right to a hearing. Any party adversely affected by this order, which is preliminary, procedural or intermediate in nature, may request: (1) reconsideration within 10 days pursuant to Rule 25- 22.0376, Florida Administrative Code; or (2) judicial review by the Florida Supreme Court, in the case of an electric, gas or telephone utility, or the First District Court of Appeal, in the case of a water or wastewater utility. A motion for reconsideration shall be filed with the Office of Commission Clerk, in the form prescribed by Rule 25-22.0376, Florida Administrative Code. Judicial review of a preliminary, procedural or intermediate ruling or order is available if review of the final action will not provide an adequate remedy. Such review may be requested from the appropriate court, as described above, pursuant to Rule 9.100, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. PROCLAMATION HONORING KERNIE D. FULLER ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEL OPMENTIB UILDING DIVISION WHEREAS, Kernie D. Fuller retired from the Indian River County Building Division effective May 31, 2017; and WHEREAS, Kernie D. Fuller began his career with Indian River County on August 22, 1991, as a Maintenance Worker III for Solid Waste. On November 8, 1991, he was promoted to Maintenance Worker IV; on December 3, 1993, he was promoted to Maintenance Worker VI; on October 3. 1997, he was promoted to Building Inspector I; and on May 2, 2014, Kernie D. Fuller was promoted to Building Inspector H and continued in that capacity until his retirement; and WHEREAS, Kernie D. Fuller has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During his twenty-five years of service, he was dedicated, and his work was greatly appreciated by the employer, citizens, and co-workers alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Kernie D. Fuller's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last twenty-five years, and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors! Adopted tit is 23rd Day of May 2017. 1t1��R BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIANRIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA < �Ic ' Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman 2riis is to cerrtiiify that KPrnie 0. Tuber is here6y presented this Rf tirement Award for outstanding performance and faithfuf serpke to Indian ftver County hoard of County Commissioners Tor twenty-five years of service On the 31st day ofJKay 2017 Z stadey BoCrng Director of Community Oevelopment Joseph E. Trencher Board of County Commissioner, Chairman P7 HONORING CHRISTOPHER D. THOMAS ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SER VICESIFIRE RESCUE WHEREAS, Christopher D. Thomas retired from Indian River County Fire Rescue effective May S, 2017, and WHEREAS, Christopher D. Thomas began his career on May 16, 1990, as a Firefighter. Three months later, he received his Emergency Medical Technician certification. He was promoted to Driver Engineer on August 4, 2000, and continued in that capacity until his retirement, and WHEREAS, Christopher D. Thomas has served this County and the Public with distinction and se 7essness. During his twenty-seven years of service, his devotion to his profession, his employer, the citizens of Indian River County and his co-workers was always evident; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Christopher D. Thomas' efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their deepest gratitude for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last twenty-seven years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff Wend their sincerest wishes for success in his future endeavors. Adopted this 23rd day of May 2017 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ghis is tofy that Chi opher (D. gfiiomas is hereby presented'this WStirement .Award for outstanding performance and fiaithfulservice to Indian 24ver County Board of County Commissioners For twenty -*years of service On this 5th Day ofstay 2017 ,john IUng 0imctor ofEmGergency Services Joseph E. T'lacfier 43oardof County Commissioner, Cfusihman P9 gA JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27v' Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: DIANE BERNARDO, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: May 11, 2017 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHECKS AND ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS May 5, 2017 to May 11, 2017 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all checks and electronic payments issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached lists of checks and electronic payments, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of May 5, 2017 to May 11 2017. Attachment: i -- Pio CHECKS WRITTEN TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 353144 05/11/2017 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 66,512.18 353145 05/11/2017 JORDAN MOWER INC 2,843.33 353146 05/11/2017 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 13,191.79 353147 05/11/2017 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC 1,058.76 353148 05/11/2017 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 776.30 353149 05/11/2017 PERERS ENTERPRISES INC 4,200.53 353150 05/11/2017 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOC INC 244.95 353151 05/11/2017 VELDE ):ORD INC 526.95 353152 05/11/2017 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 2,150.61 353153 05/11/2017 E -Z BREW COFFEE & BOTTLE WATER SVC 43.43 35.3154 05/11/2017 GRAINGER 165.84 353155 05/11/2017 KELLY TRACTOR CO 9,816.65 353156 05/11/2017 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 590.80 353157 05/11/2017 MY RECEPTIONIST INC 320.07 353158 05/11/2017 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 1,090.32 353159 05/11/2017 LFI FORT PIERCE INC 2,393.51 353160 05/.11/2017 KSM ENGINEERING & TESTING INC 95.00 353161 05/11/2017 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 6,861.27 353162 05/11/2017 SCHULKE BITTLE & STODDARD LLC 4;371.07 353163 05/11/2017 VERO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 308.13 353164 05/11/2017 TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC 3,411.91 353165 05/11/2017 BARTH CONSTRUCTION INC 145,983.52 353166 05/11/2017 CHILDCARE RESOURCES OF IRC INC 240.00 353167 05/11/2017 DELL MARKETING LP 5,416.51 353168 05/11/2017 MYRON LCOMPANY 700.77 353169 05/11/2017 THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 583.50 353170 05/11/2017 BLAKESLEE SERVICES INC 65.00 353171 05/11/2017 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 559.64 353172 05/11%2017 COMPUTYPE INC 780.63 353173 05/11/2017 MIDWEST TAPE LLC 555.34 353174 05/11/2017 MWI CORP 274.49 353175 05/11/2017 MICROMARKETING LLC 69.69 353176 05/11/2017 BAKER DISTRIBUTING CO LLC 553.94 353177 05/11/2017 CENGAGE LEARNING INC 28.79 353178 05/11/2017 GO COASTAL INC 137.25 353179 05/11/2017 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 160,219.57 353180 05/11/2017 PATRICK EXTERMINATING INC 200.00 353181 05/11/2017 CREATIVE CHOICE HOMES XVI LTD 490.00 353182 05/11/2017 PARKS AND SON INC 4,039.97 353183 05/11/2017 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 386.68 353184 05/11/2017 CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT 1,194.10 353185 05/11/2017 CITY OF VERO BEACH 60,726.31 353186 05/11/2017 STEPHEN WOJTASZEK 74.96 353187 05/11/2017 INDIAN RIVER ALL FAB INC 1,575.70 353188 05/11/2017 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 14.92 353189 05/11/2017 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 219.55 353190 05/11/2017 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 238.88 353191 05/11/2017 LIVINGSTON PAGE 120.00 353192 05111/2017 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 527.73 353193 05/11/2017 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 67.11 353194 05/11/2017 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 14.95 353195 05/11/2017 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 26.67 353196 05/11/2017 VERO BEACH HIGH SCHOOL 350.00 353197 05/11/2017 DEANGELO BROTHERS INC 232.00 353198 05/11/2017 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 1,277.62 353199 05/11/2017 TIMOTHY ROSE CONTRACTING INC 49,125.08 353200 05/11/2017 CALLAWAY GOLF SALES COMPANY 3,383.82 353201 05/11/2017 FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC INC 320.00 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 353202 05/11/2017 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 7,949.92 353203 05/11/2017 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 1,883.57 353204 05/11/2017 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 1,468.41 353205 05/11/2017 PHILLIP J MATSON 3.20 353206 05/11/2017 VNA HEALTH SERVICES 250.00 353207 05/11/2017 PEACE RIVER ELECTRIC COOP INC 30.31 353208 05/11/2017 SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL OF FL INC 1,067.30 353209 05/1112017 STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES & CREMATORY 425.00 353210 05/11/2017 TOCOMA RUBBER STAMP & MARKING SYSTEM 12.49 353211 05/11/2017 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 1,000.00 353212 05/11/2017 GERALD AYOUNG SR 60.00 353213 05/11/2017 MYLES BROWN 120.00 353214 05/11/2017 GREY HOUSE PUBLISHING 134.10 353215 05/11/2017 HENRY SMITH 200.00 353216 05/11/2017 ALAN C KAUFFMANN 160.0.0 353217 05/11/2017 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HISTORICAL 2,551.74 353218 05/11/2017 G K ENVIRONMENTAL INC 3_.900.00 353219 05/11/2017 WESTSIDE REPROGRAPHICS OF VERO BEACH INC 132.75 353220 05/11/2017 CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FL 2,000.00 353221 05/11/2017 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 722.00 353222 05/11/2017 PELICAN ISLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY INC 3,592.50 353223 05/11/2017 ST LUCIE COUNTY BOCC 5,865.60 353224 05/11/2017 PERKINS COMPOUNDING PHARMACY 29..58 353225 05/11/2017 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 1,944.60 353226 05/1112017 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 3,016.32 353227 05/11/2017 ANIXTER INC 93.75 353228 05/11/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION NO 2 199.23 353229 05/11/2017 CINDY CORRENTE 23.85 353230 05/11/2017 VAN WALING 265.00 353231 05/11/2017 JOSEPH W VASQUEZ 100.00 353232 05/11/2017 OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER 421.89 353233 05/11/2017 MBV ENGINEERING INC 11,435.00 353234 05/11/2017 CENTRAL PUMP & SUPPLY INC 151.36 353235 05/11/2017 ASSOCIATON OF FLORIDA CONSERVATION DISTRICTS 55.00 353236 05/11/2017 MASTELLER & MOLER INC 6,303.75 353237 05/11/2017 STAPLES CONTRACT & COMMERCIAL INC 499.33 353238 05/11/2017 GARY L EMBREY 100.00 353239 05/11/2017 LARRY STEPHENS 200.00 353240 05/11/2017 l ST FIRE & SECURITY INC .144.00 353241 05/11/2017 SUNCOAST REALTY & RENTAL MGMT LLC 518.00 353242 05/11/2017 MICHAEL W EIRLS 1,300.00 353243 05111/2017 PETER OBRYAN 15.53 353244 05/11/2017 JOHNNY B SMITH 100.00 353245 05/11/2017 MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS INC 67,739.68 353246 05/11/2017 MOORE MEDICAL LLC 261.30 353247 05/11/2417 GLOBALSTAR USA 146.82 353248 05/11/2017 CHARLES A WALKER 20.00 353249 05/11/2017 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 3,948.50 353250 05/11/2017 INDIAN RIVER RDA LP 276.00 353251 05/11/2017 CEMEX 3,584.20 353252 05/11/2017 GUARDIAN COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 1,000.00 353253 05/11/2017 MICHAEL KORPAR 80.00 353254 05/11/2017 INTERNATIONAL SWEEPING INC 2,520.00 353255 05/11/2017 BILLYS AUTO SERVICE 2,641.47 353256 05/11/2017 DANA SAFETY SUPPLY INC 1,448.10 353257 05/11/2017 MARINCO BIOASSAY LABORATORY INC 2,080.00 353258 05/11/2017 FLEETBOSS G P S INC. 419.40 353259 05/11/2017 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING 16,954.08 353260 05/11/2017 YOUTH GUIDANCE DONATION FUND 1,250.00 353261 05/11/2017 NICOLACE MARKETING INC 10,318.72 P12 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 353262 05/11/2017 HMA-SOLANTIC JOINT VENTURE LLC DBA 285.00 353263 05/11/2017 SANDYARACENA 20.00 353264 05/11/2017 VERA SMITH 56.00 353265 05/11/2017 GARRETTSMITH 180.00 353266 05/11/2017 BRENNTAG MID -SOUTH INC 7,464.36 353267 05/11/2017 DE LA HOZ BUILDERS INC 10,667.00 353268 05/11/2017 WOERNER DEVELOPMENT INC 1,045.00 353269 05/11/2017 ATLANTIC COASTAL LAND TITLE CO LLC 75.00 353270 05/11/2017 KEMPER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 27.50 353271 05/11/2017 SPX CORPORATION 1,458.26 353272 05/11/2017 HEATHER HATTON 40.00 353273 05/11/2017 MOORE MOTORS INC 101.13 353274 05/11/2017 RUTH BOMMARITO 23.89 353275 05/11/2017 TIM ZORC 31.33 353276 05/11/2017 LOWES HOME CENTERS INC 477.18 353277 05/11/2017 ALEX MIKLO 80.00 353278 05/11/2017 BURNETT LIME CO INC 25,782.40 353279 05/11/2017 SOUTHWIDE INDUSTRIES INC 2,375.10 353280 05/11/2017 TREASURE COAST TURF INC 1,350.00 353281 05/11/2017 CARMEN LEWIS 92.00 353282 05/11/2017 STRAIGHT OAK LLC 155.45 353283. 05/11/2017 SCADA SOLUTIONS LLC 1,000.00 353284 05/11/2017 KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN 276.80 353285. 05/11/2017 FLORIDA TRAVEL VACATIONS INC 595.00 353286 05/11/2017 COURSE TRENDS INC 300.00 353287 .05/11/2017 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION 6,664.87 353288 05/11/2017 COLONIAL HEIGHTS ACQUISITION LP 500.00 353289 05/11/2017 SUSAN ADAMS 35.60 353290 05/11/2017 MARKETING SPECIALTIES OF GEORGIA LLC 1,405.33 353291 05/11/2017 BERNARD EGAN & COMPANY 1,565.95 353292 05/11/2017 RONALD NICHELSON 60.00 353293 05/11/2017 FOUNDATION FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL 454.00 353294 05/11/2017 MICHAEL EDWARD HAMILTON 600.00 353295 05/11/2017 JULIANA E YOUNG 5,503.00 353296 05/11/2017 SYLIVIA MILLER 76.00 353297 05/11/2017 THE TRANSIT GROUP INC 11,724.38 353298 05/11/2017 ANFIELD CONSULTING GROUP INC 10,000.00 353299 05/11/2017 FLORITURF SOD INC 80.00 353300 05/11/2017 ENCORE ONE LLC 2,271.86 353301 05/11/2017 TRITON SUBMARINES LLC 10,666.69 353302 05/11/2017 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 3,275.56 353303 05/11/2017 ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC 880.00 353304 05/11/2017 SCRIPPS NP OPERATING LLC 264.00 353305 05/11/2017 KENDRACOPE 11.13 353306 05/11/2017 TRIBOND LLC 33,232.80 353307 05/11/2017 RED THE UNIFORM TAILOR 56.25 353308 05/11/2017 CATHEDRAL CORPORATION 3,936.45 353309 05/11/2017 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 1,706.11 353310 05/11/2017 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO 1,080.00 353311 05/11/2017 SCHUMACHER AUTOMOTIVE DELRAY LLC 197.88 353312 05/11/2017 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 1,783.45 353313 05/11/2017 ADVANCE STORES COMPANY INCORPORATED 740.06 353314 05/11/2017 DENISE GILLESPIE 20.00 •353315 05/11/2017 EGP DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 748.60 353316 05/11/2017 RUSSELL L OWEN III 100.00 353317 05/11/2017 PATRICK JAMES ECYCLE LLC 360.00 353318 05/11/2017 EDWARD ILLIDGE 60.00 353319 05/11/2017 OKLAHOMA SIMMS 100.00 353320 05/11/2017 COVERALL NORTH AMERICA INC 2,015.00 353321 05/11/2017 VERO BEACH AUTO DEALERSHIP LLC 1,238.32 P13 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 353322 05/11/2017 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC 11,715.60 353323 05/11/2017 PEOPLE READY INC 11,460.16 353324 05/11/2017 KEITH ADAMS 25.00 353325 05/11/2017 ROBERT O RICHARDSON Ill 80.00 353326 05/11/2017 STEVE MIX 562.50 353327 05/11/2017 EMILY GOUGE 80.00 353328 05/11/2017 NATHAN OTTOSON 15.30 353329 05/11/2017 RAUL E V3VANCO 492.00 353330 05/11/2017 COLE AUTO SUPPLY INC 2,862.70 353331 05/11/2017 DARREN WARMOUTH 80.00 353332 05/11/2017 COREY GRALEY 80.00 353333 05/11/2017 KIMBERLY RICCIARDONE 40.00 353334 05/11/2017 BETH NOLAN 50.00 353335 05/11/2017 RUN VERO 128.60 353336 05/11/2017 MILB ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS LLC 5,000.00 353337 05/11/2017 LUIS SOMOZA 937.50 353338 05/11/2017 PATRICIA SMERDELL 316.00 353339 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 45.85 353340 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 26.01 353341 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 91.74 353342 05%11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 72.96 353343 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 1.15 353344 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 18.95 353345 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 60.58 353346 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 282.60 353347 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 26.60 353348 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 230.55 353349 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 32.93 353350 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 64.27 353351 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 99.39 353352 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 83.21 353353 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 44.00 353354 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 19.27 353355 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 63.81 353356 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 102.34 353357 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 83.05 353358 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 18.82 353359 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 77.53 353360 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 63.02 353361 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 29.65 353362 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 37.77 353363 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 62.73 353364 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 35.78 353365 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 23.94 353366 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 64.89 353367 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 61.44 353368 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 10.05 353369 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 160.54 353370 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 3.94 353371 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 77.53 353372 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 18.79 353373 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 42.19 353374 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 40.27 353375 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 79.11 353376 05/11/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 78.64 353377 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 3.11 353378 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 53.81 353379 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 57.45 353380 05/11/2017 UTILREFUNDS 206.13 Grand Total: 930,934.88 P14 ELECTRONIC PAYMENT - VISA CARD TRANS. NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 1011275 05/05/2017 AT&T 13,546.78 1011276 05/05/2017 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 104.40 1011277 05/05/2017 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 3,705.67 1011278 05/05/2017 COMCAST 264.55 1011279 05/05/2017 EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 605.06 1011280 05/05/2017 PARKS RENTAL & SALES INC 406.75 1011281 05/05/2017 COLKITT SHEET METAL & A/C INC 367.00 1011282 05/05/2017 ROBINSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 1,013.06 1011283 05/05/2017 SSES INC 148.11 1011284 05/05/2017 COPYCOINC 80.00 1011285 05/05/2017 HENRY SCHEIN INC 157.25 1011286 05/05/2017 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 300.64 1011287 05/05/2017 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 269.45 1011288 05/05/2017 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 85.00 1011289 05/05/2017 RING POWER CORPORATION 571.75 1011290 05/05/2017 MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC 55.00 1011291 05/05/2017 GALLS LLC 2,961.77 1011292 05/05/2017 THE EXPEDITER 339.61 1011293 05/05/2017 GROVE WELDERS INC 956.78 1011294 05/05/2017 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 1,083.32 1011295 05/05/2017 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 1,129.10 1011296 05/05/2017 COMO OIL COMPANY OF FLORIDA 105.04 1011297 05/05/2017 SOUTHERN PLUMBING INC 257.00 1011298 05/05/2017 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY CO 638.18 1011299 05/05/2017 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 2,745.77 1011300 05/052017 METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 112.00 1011301 05/05/2017 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 228.78 1011302 05/05/2017 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 467.01 1011303 05/05/2017 CM&S INDUSTRIES INC 1,780.00 1011304 05/10/2017 .EVERGLADES FARM EQUIPMENT CO INC 1,721.14 1011305 05/10/2017 PARKS RENTAL & SALES INC 132.00 1011306 05/10/2017 NORTH SOUTH SUPPLY INC 325.84 1011307 05/10/2017 COLD AIR DISTRIBUTORS WAREHOUSE 183.56 1011308 05/102017 INDIAN RIVER BATTERY 168.00 1011309 05/102017 MIKES GARAGE & WRECKER SERVICE INC 205.00 1011310 05/102017 GROVE WELDERS INC 1,134.14 1011311 05/10/2017 RECORDED BOOKS LLC 164.40 1011312 05/102017 DEERE & COMPANY 420.62 1011313 05/1012017 COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP 422.80 1011314 05/10/2017 SHRIEVE CHEMICAL CO 9,510.69 1011315 05/102017 SYNAGRO-WWT INC 97,214.62 1011316 05/102017 SOUTHERN JANITOR SUPPLY INC 623.00 1011317 05/10/2017 HARCROS CHEMICALS, INC. 3,364.41 1011318 05/10/2017 METRO FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES INC 57.00 1011319 05/10/2017 SIMS CRANE & EQUIPMENT CO 59920 1011320 05/10/2017 BENNETT AUTO SUPPLY INC 22.48 1011321 05/10/2017 AUTO PARTNERS LLC 23.92 1011322 05/10/2017 HYDRA SERVICE (S) INC 36,596.46 1011323 05/102017 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC 3,201.00 1011324 05/112017 CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC 3,531.35 1011325 05/112017 INDIAN RIVER OXYGEN INC 3,441.00 1011326 05/112017 SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE 54.80 1011327 05/112017 AT&T 990.98 1011328 05/11/2017 OFFICE DEPOT BSD CUSTOMER SVC 1,770.62 1011329 05/11/2017 WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 2,669.84 1011330 05/11/2017 POLYDYNE INC 2,507.00 Grand Total: 205,540.70 P15 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR 5117 05/05/2017 IRC FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC 5118 05/05/2017 NACO/SOUTHEAST 5119 05/05/2017 NACO/SOUTHEAST 5120 05/05/2017 1CMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION 5121 05/05/2017 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION 5122 05/05/2017 BENEFITS WORKSHOP 5123 05/05/2017 FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC 5124 05/05/2017 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SHERIFF 5125 05/05/2017 IRC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 5126 05/05/2017 VETERANS COUNCIL OF I R C P -CARD 05/08/2017 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 5127 05/08/2017 IRS -PAYROLL TAXES 5128 05/08/2017 FL SDU Grand Total: AMOUNT 6,930.00 40,512.39 1,318.08 35,590.72 2,430.00 5,264.24 4,234.83 643,034.00 16,442.87 5,885.24 30,860.18 439,971.61 6,073.41 1,238,547.57 JEFFREY R SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 271" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Telephone: (772) 226-1945 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Edward Halsey, Internal Auditor THRU: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller DATE: May l6, 2017 SUBJECT: Quarterly Tourist Development Tax Report for Quarter Ending 03/31/2017, BACKGROUND Attached to this memorandum is the report of the tourist development tax monies collected in Clerk's office for quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2017. The report shows five categories of activity including short-term rentals. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept the attached Quarterly Tourist Development Tax Report. P17 Short Term Rentals Hotel/ Motel Boarding/ApArtments Mobile Homes Timeshare FO Indian River County Tourist Development Tax Received by the Indian River County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Quarters Ended March 31, 2016 and 201.7 Quarter (16,043) Ended % 3/31./2016 Of Total $ 310,930 31.15% 619,692 62.08% 15.922 1.60% 15.237 1..53% 36,420 3.65% $ 998,201 100.00% Quarter (16,043) Ended % 3/31/2017 Of Total $ 294,887 25.77% 783,724 68.50% 15.715 1.37% 15,640 1.37% 34,127. 2.98% $ 1;144,093 100.00% Increase % Decrease) Change $ (16,043) -5.16% $ 164,032 26.47% $ (207) -1.30% $ 403 2.64% $ (2.293) -6.30% $ 145,892 14.62% BCC AGENDA MAY 23, 2017 CONSENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: May 23, 2017 SUBJECT: Letter of Support for McKee Jungle Garden FROM: Dori Roy Assistant to the County Administrator McKee Jungle Garden is making an application for a 2018 State of Florida Division of Cultural Affairs General Program Support Grant. It has been requested that the Board of County Commission authorize a letter of support to include in this grant application. Staff recommends the Board of County Commission approve the attached letter of support for McKee Jungle Garden to be included in the grant application for General Program Support. Attachment: Proposed Letter of Support P19 Joseph E. Flescher Chairman District I Peter D. O'Bryan Vice Chairman District 4 May 23, 2017 Florida Department of State Division of Cultural Affairs Florida Council on Arts and Culture To Whom It May Concern: McKee Botanical Garden in Vero Beach, Florida, is submitting a General Program Support grant application for assistance in support of their annual programs and educational efforts. The Indian River County Board of County Commission supports McKee Botanical Garden and their many programs. As a premier cultural facility for Indian River County, as well as a historic landmark for the State of Florida, McKee Botanical Garden is a valued resource for cultural enrichment, hosting a variety of programs including world-class art exhibits, educational offerings and special events. These include important horticultural collections - most notably the largest collection of waterlilies in the State of Florida, over twenty educational programs, 11 special events, and an annual sculpture exhibit. These opportunities to connect with and learn from nature provide unique ways for the general public to experience the natural heritage of our Florida landscape. Tens of thousands of visitors from all fifty states and more than 30 countries enter the gates of McKee Botanical Garden annually. The Gardens are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and have been endorsed by The Garden Conservancy as a project of National Significance. General Program Support will benefit the continuing efforts of this valuable resource for Indian River County and the State of Florida. The Indian River County Board of County Commission encourages you to support this grant request. Thank you for your commitment to the cultural institutions that make our community and our state so vital and vibrant. Sincerely, Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman District 2 1801 271h Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 P20 Susan Adams �V ER �,O G� District 1 4 Tim Zorc District 3 Bob Solari OR1�4' District S McKee Botanical Garden in Vero Beach, Florida, is submitting a General Program Support grant application for assistance in support of their annual programs and educational efforts. The Indian River County Board of County Commission supports McKee Botanical Garden and their many programs. As a premier cultural facility for Indian River County, as well as a historic landmark for the State of Florida, McKee Botanical Garden is a valued resource for cultural enrichment, hosting a variety of programs including world-class art exhibits, educational offerings and special events. These include important horticultural collections - most notably the largest collection of waterlilies in the State of Florida, over twenty educational programs, 11 special events, and an annual sculpture exhibit. These opportunities to connect with and learn from nature provide unique ways for the general public to experience the natural heritage of our Florida landscape. Tens of thousands of visitors from all fifty states and more than 30 countries enter the gates of McKee Botanical Garden annually. The Gardens are listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and have been endorsed by The Garden Conservancy as a project of National Significance. General Program Support will benefit the continuing efforts of this valuable resource for Indian River County and the State of Florida. The Indian River County Board of County Commission encourages you to support this grant request. Thank you for your commitment to the cultural institutions that make our community and our state so vital and vibrant. Sincerely, Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman District 2 1801 271h Street, Building A Vero Beach, FL 32960 (772) 226-1490 P20 Iwo CONSENT AGENDA May 23, 2017 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of County Commissioners DATE: May 12, 2017 SUBJECT:. Out of County. Travel to Attend Florida Shore &. Beach Preservation Association Annual Conference FROM: Dori Roy, Assistant to the County Administrator Out of county travel is requested for commissioners and staff to attend the Florida Shore & Beach . Preservation Association Conference September 27th to 29th, 2017, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida Attachment: Conference Information P21 511212017 2017 Annual Conference - Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association HOME ABOUT r'UBUCAIIOvS EVENTS MENIMRS€-Iiia CONTACT 2017 FSBPA Annual Conference September 27-29 Westin Fart Lauderdale Beach Resort I Fort Lauderdale, Florida Who thould Attend? Registration Information * Members of the Legislature and Legislative Staff Hotel'information * State Environmental Resource Protection Agencies ' City and County Commissioners Exhibit Information * Tourist Development Councils and Convention & Visitors Bureaus Call for Abstracts ' Coastal Engineers and Coastal Industry Interests Hare intonation evaibb€a soon * U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Deadline June 2617 * Inlet Districts and other Special Interest Districts Award Nominations * Other General Government and Co9staVOcean Associations more infornwilon evemble soon * Environmental Groups and Alliances * Coastal Geologists and Biologists * City and County Environmental Resource Managers and Beach Management Coordinators * Community Associations and Citizen Beach Advisory Committees *Coastal Residents and other interested Citizens http] www.f bpa.comlannuai-c onference.htmI IN P22 511212017 2017 Anrival Conference - Florida Shore and Beach Preservabon Association J_ 6-fh Annual Conference Home About F Uf�hcafiOn6 Evants Melnuership Contact Us - - Emoloymehl v 2016 Florida Snore and Beach Preservar+oi; A ssucrat,on All lights Reserved hVJAvww.hbpa.com/annual-conference.htmI PTO P23 5/12/2D17 2017 Annual Conference Registration - Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association HO VIE ABOW PUSI [GAIJONS EVENTS {elFhlablist '.{P 0014 A4, I 2017 FSSPA Annul Conference Early Registration Through August 31„ 2017 Member Registration $375 Non -Member Registration $500 Spouse -Non Business Guest $125' Full Time Student $125*' Registration information Registration will be open in May 2017 Registration Fees Regular Registration September 1 - September 22, 2017 Member Registration $425 Non -Member Registration $550 Spouse -Non Business Guest $125* Full Time Student $125** Onsite Registration After September 22, 2017 Member Registration $525 Non -Member Registration $650 Spouse -Non Business Guest $125* Full Time Student $125** * Spouse/Non-Business Guest Registration fee includes Awards Reception and Dinner '* Students must provide current student ID CANCELLATION POLICY: Cancellation Fee: $50 FSBPA must receive cancellation requests in writing, by email or regular mail, no later than September 11, 2017. Email requests to mail@fsb6a.com. No refunds will be given for cancellation/refund requests received after September 11, 2017. Substitutions are welcomed. Return to Annual Conference Page tVJANww.fsbpa.com/annual-conforence/roostrabon.htmf 1/2 P24 5/12017 2017 Arrwal Corifereme Hotel Information - Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association HOME ABOu 1 PUB. IC Al K %rl, E VE 14 1 S MEMBERSHIP CONTAGI 2017 FSBPA Annual Conference Hotel Information Westin Fort Lauderdale Beach Resort 321 North Fort Lauderdale Beach Blvd Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304 954.467.1111 Online Reservations For Reservations by Phone Call: 1.800.937.8461 To ensure that a room is available, reservations must be made by 5:00 pm EDT August 31, 2017. After this date, rooms may not be available. Group Rate' $169 single/double, plus tax "The resort fee is included In the group rate. The resort fee includes 1-800/local call, guest Internet access, beach and pool towel usage, complimentary access to the Westin workout fitness studio, complimetary morning newspaper, Monday -Friday. Self -parking Is not available. Valet Parking is reduced from $39 per day to $20 per day plus 6% tax for our group. WHEN MAKING YOUR RESERVATION by phone, PLEASE MENTION the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association TO RECEIVE THE GROUP RATE. All reservations must be guaranteed with a major credit card or check. A one-night cancellation fee will be charged for cancellations made less than 72 hours prior to arrival. Most major credit cards are accepted Check in: 3:00 p.m. Check out: 12 noon t*vJANww.fsbpa.com/anwW-caderwmVhotel.htmI 112 1 P25 TE CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Michael Smykowski, Director, Office of Management and Budget FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Declaration of Excess Equipment as Surplus for Sale or Disposal BACKGROUND: The equipment on the attached list has been determined excess to the needs of Indian River County and requires disposal in accordance with Florida Statutes and Finance Policies. As authorized by the Board, the items will either be held in storage until the next scheduled auction or sold by online auction. The funds received from the sale of these items will be returned to the appropriate accounts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board declare the items on the attached Excess Equipment List as surplus and authorize their sale and/or disposal as indicated. There is no cost to the County associated with this request. ATTACHMENT: Excess Equipment List Dated May 15, 2017 P26 @BCL@F8049078 (Dept #k Asset ffF,leet Description VIN/Serial' @jjjo� 243 (2) Brother intellifax Fax Machines 2820 & 1270c Y 243 1 cell phone y 233 22210 Dell Latitude D600 Laptop N 102 HP Printer 1529347 N 102 HP Printer CNB11321244 300 21003 HP 4100 TN Laser Printer JPLGD12216 N 203 23413 Scanner - HP Digital Sender 2374 N 120 196200 ALS Handheld Carevent 1497-00 204 18643 Compaq Armada Laptop 244 24309 Dell Latitude ATG D630 Laptop 315PND1 N 222 22469 801 Chevrolet Impala 2G1WF52E359318117 Y 120 Beelkin 4port Soho Switch 8.00E+10 N 222 23484 dell optiplex 745 system w/17" 4V1SHC1 N 222 23486 dell optiplex 745 system with 17" 7V1SHC1 N 222 23986 HP Laserjet 4250 Printer cs:2465 N 120 22036 JVC Camera Model KY-F560U 9950052 N 233 Oce'TDS600LargeFormatScanner 961009528 Y 233 21289 Fujitsu Fl -4750L scanner N 241 24174 Poweredge 2950, Old AV Server 87KL4D3 Y 241 26692 Power Vault Server TL 4000 520TXS1 Y 241 Misc Large Lot, Wires, Keyboards, Printers, Monitors, Switches, Etc. Non Asset Items Y/N 120 24811 Dell Latitude D630 Laptops CN-OKU184-12961-874-D551 N 120 24809 Dell Latitude D630 Laptops CN-0KU184-12961-874-DD44 N 120 24807 Dell Latitude D630 Laptops CN-OKU184-12961-874-DD4A N 120 24812 Dell Latitude D630 Laptops CN-OKU184-12961-874-DA78 N 120 24810 Dell Latitude D630 Laptops CN-OKU184-12961-874-DD4B N 120 24826 Dell Latitude D630 Laptops CN-OKU184-12961-874-B243 N 120 24808 Dell Latitude D630 Laptops CN-OKU184-12961-874-B8A5 N 120 24814 Dell Latitude D630 Laptops CN-OKU184-12961-874-DA84 N 120 22834 1GPS Clock N 244 (3) Motorola RDV2020 Radios, chargers and Batteries N 244 (3) LG Xpression phones Y 244 HP Officejet Pro8500 wire desktop printer N 245 3910 164 5x10 Utility Trailer N 242 25593A & 26313 Jpro OLA Cable & Pegisys OTC Scan Tool, these are attached to each other N 242 23919 Genisys Scanner N 242 164930 Nemisys Diagnostic Scanner BSA37660159 N 242 165300 Robin - Air A/C Recycling Machine N 242 24564 Nexiq Software N 244 20031 Hp Laserjet 5000 GN HEWLECS1713 Y 244 18882 HP Laserjet 4050TN Printer Y 120 Ivarious Computer / Laptop Products, Non Assets y 244 Canon Imageclass D320 N 500 HP U Printer P2015DO CNBJN58140 Y 220 8661 Airless Paint Sprayer (1986) N 248 25976 Toshiba Printer N 248 26315 Badge Machine N 248 23712 818 2007 Turtle Top Bus 1GBJG310671109543 N 248 25522 622 12009 Titan Bus 1GBE5V1909F413231 N 248 25523 652 12009 Titan Bus 1GBE5V3969F413315 N 241 22507C Poweredge 2800 21:0601 N 241 24337 Poweredge 2950 BDUGMD1 N 241 25174 Poweredge R200 6WDQFJI N 241 Blade Chassis JOOPQ91 N 241 Poweredge 2800 3RO6K71 N 241 22506c Poweredge 2800 J606K71 N 245 22104 1 ITruck Mounted Mast Crane CT2004 FB 21895 y 245 25032 1 ITruck Mounted Mast Crane CT2003 FB 22780 Y ng P27 gF Consent Agenda Indian River County Interoffice Memorandum Office of Management & Budget To: Members of the Board of County Commissioners From: Michael Smykowski Director, Office of Management & Budget Date: May 18, 2017 Subject: Miscellaneous Budget Amendment 016 Description and Conditions The Budget amendment appropriates funding necessary for the following: 1. In order to qualify for state Public Transportation Block Grant funds (approximately $400,000/year in Indian River County), MPOs in the state of Florida must adopt a Transit Development Plan (TDP) Major Update. Indian River County's next Major Update is scheduled to be submitted to FDOT in 2018. To meet this deadline, MPO Staff wishes to begin development of the plan prior to October 1, 2017. The TDP Major Update is a complicated, multi-year undertaking which includes tasks to identify and evaluate existing transit services and resources; determine short range transit and mobility needs; formulate transit goals and objectives; identify transit alternatives; conduct extensive outreach to Transportation Disadvantaged communities; select preferred alternatives, and develop a 10 -year implementation plan, capital replacement plan, and operating budget. Funding for the Plan Update is paid for by Federal Transit Planning (Section 5305d) funds obtained from FDOT through a five-year JPA (Contract # G0359, total amount - $254,695) approved by the MPO on October 1, 2015. Exhibit "A" appropriates funding of $30,000 for the grant and expenditure. P28 RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 BUDGET. WHEREAS, certain appropriation and expenditure amendments to the adopted Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Budget are to be made by resolution pursuant to section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County desires to amend the fiscal year 2016-2017 budget, as more specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Budget be and hereby is amended as set forth in Exhibit "A" upon adoption of this Resolution. This Resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman, Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman, Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner, Susan Adams Commissioner, Bob Solari Commissioner, Tim Zorc The Chairman thereupon declared this Resolution duly passed and adopted this day of , 2017. Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith Clerk of Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Board of County Commissioners Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman BY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY COUNTY ATTORNEY P29 Resolution No. 2017 - Budget Office Approval: Exhibit "A" Michael Smykowski, Budget Director Budget Amendment: 016 Entry Number Fund/ Department/Account Name Account Number Increase Decrease 1. Revenue MPO/Intergovernmental Grants/FTA 5305 TDP Major Update 124033-331413 $30,000 $0 Expense MPO/Planning/Other Contractual Services/TDP Major Update 12420415-033490-08014 $30,000 $0 1 of 1 P30 7NT 7 CONS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: James W. Ennis, P.E., PMP, County Engineer SUBJECT: FDOT Local Agency Program (LAP) Supplemental Agreement No. 1 and Resolution Authorizing the Chairman's Signature 81h Street Sidewalk Improvements (58th Avenue to 21St Court) DATE: May 5, 2017 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On June 21, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Local Agency Program (LAP) Agreement FM No. 431733-1-58 / 68-01 with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for the construction of a 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk and minor drainage modifications along the north side of 8th Street from 58th Avenue to 21St Court, a length of approximately 2.5 miles. The LAP Grant will provide up to $455,243.00 reimbursement of the eligible construction cost which includes construction engineering inspection (CEI) services. On November 8, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners awarded Bid No. 2017009 for this project to Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $575,858.97. The FDOT has requested Indian River County execute and deliver to the FDOT LAP Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to increase the agreement amount by $95,000 for construction costs to $550,243.00, as well as a Resolution authorizing the Board of County Commissioners to execute this LAP Supplemental Agreement No. 1. FUNDING The federal funds appropriated for this FDOT LAP grant will be in the amount of $501,467.00 for construction and $48,776.00 for construction engineering inspection (CEI) services totaling $550,243.00. Funding is budgeted and available from Optional Sales Tax Account No. 31521441-066510-13006, 8th Street Sidewalk (58th Avenue to 21s' Court). The maximum construction cost matching funds in the amount of $74,391.97 will be required. F:\Publio Works\ENOINEERINO DIVISION PROJECTS\1049_8th St Sidewalk Improvements (58thh Ave to 21st Court)\1-Admin\agenda items\Supplemental No. 1 LAP\13CC Agenda Supp No 1 and Resolution 5-23-2017.doo P31 Page 2 FDOT LAP Supplemental Agreement No. 1 8t" Street Sidewalk Improvements (58th Avenue to 21St Court) For May 23, 2017 BCC Meeting RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Local Agency Program (LAP) Supplemental Agreement No.1 - FM No. 431733-1-58-01 and further recommends adopting the Resolution and authorizing the Chairman to sign Supplement Agreement No. 1. ATTACHMENTS 1. Authorizing Resolution 2. FDOT LAP Supplemental Agreement No. 1 FM No. 431733-1-58-01 APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR MAY 23, 2017 F:\Public Works\ENGWEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1049_8th St Sidewalk Improvements (58th Ave to 21st Court)\1-Admin\agenda items\Supplemental No. I LAP\BCC Agenda Supp No I and Resolution 5-23-2017.doe P32 RESOLUTION NO. 2017 - RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN'S EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NUMBER ONE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 5 -FOOT WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND MINOR DRAINAGE MODIFICATIONS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET FROM 58TH AVENUE TO 21ST COURT. WHEREAS, the construction of a sidewalk and minor drainage modifications along the north side of 811 Street from 58th Avenue to 211t Court is an Indian River County priority project; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is prepared to provide funds to pay a portion of the cost for construction of sidewalks and minor drainage modifications along the north side of 8th Street from 58th Avenue to 21St Court under the Local Agency Program (LAP); and WHEREAS, the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, has requested Indian River County execute and deliver to the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, Local Agency Program Supplemental Agreement Number One for the aforementioned project increasing the amount of the grant from $455,243.00 to $550,243.00; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized to make, execute, and deliver to the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, a Local Agency Program Agreement for the aforementioned project. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice -Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Bob Solari Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Tim Zorc who moved its and, upon being put to a vote, The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and adopted this day of , 2017. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY. Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Dylan Reingold, County Attorney C:\Users\GRANIC-1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@8005638E\@BCL@8005638E.doc P33 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 525-01032 MANAGEMENT LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM PROGRAM 0,V17 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT Page I of 3 SUPPLEMENTAL NO. FEDERAL ID NO. (FAIN) One SRTS-254-A CONTRACT NO. G-OD81 FPN 431733-1-58-01 FEDERAL AWARD DATE LOCAL AGENCY DUNS NO. 079208989 The Florida Department of Transportation and Indian River County desires to supplement the original Agreement entered into and executed on -July 29,2016 as identified above. All provisions in the original Agreement and supplements, if any, remain in effect except as expressly modified by this 71M7 -T= The changes to the Agreement and supplements, if any, are described as follows: 14"s _1*ifill] " ' Cil: Name 81h St. Length 2.449 miles Termini From 58th Ave. to 21"t Ct. Description of Work: Construction of sidewalk along 8'h St, from 581h Ave. to 21s' Ct. Reason for Supplement and supporting engineering and/or cost analysis: The Supplemental Agreement increases construction Phase 58 by $95,000.00. The revised construction Phase 58 amount is $501,467.00. Refer to adjusted Exhibit °B" attached hereto and made apart hereof which replaces Exhibit OB" attached to the original Agreement. P34 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 525,01032 MENT LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM PROGRAM MANAGE03/17 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT Page 2 of 3 ADJUSTED EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF FUNDING FPN 431733-1-58-01 TYPE OF WORK By Fiscal Year FUNDING ) PREVIOUS TOTAL PROJECT FUNDS (2) ADDITIONAL PROJECT FUNDS (3) CURRENT PROJECT FUNDS ) TOTAL(4AGENCY FUNDS TOTALSTATE& FEDERAL FUNDS Planning FY: FY: FY: FY: FY: FY: Total Planning Cost S0.00 - 90.00 —$D.00. -$0.0 $9.00 Project Development & Environment (PD&E) FY: FY:, FY: FY: FY: FY: Total PD&E Cost S0.00 S0.00 ;0.00%.00 - S0.00 Design FY: FY: FY: FY: FY: FY: Total Design Cost $0.00. $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 Right -of -Way FY: Fr. FY: FY: FY: FY: Total Right -of -Way Cost S0.00 $0.00 WO $0.00 S0.00 Construction FY: 2017 FY* 2017 FY: - FY: FY: FY: Total Construction Cost $406,467.00 $95,000.00 $501,467.00 $501,467.00 $72,788.00 572.786.00 572,788.00 $0.00 S479.255.00 L95,000.00. :9674.255.00 S72,788.00 $501,467.00 Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) FY: 2017 FY: 2017 FY: FY: FY: FY: Total CEI Cost Total Construction & CEI Costs $48.776.00 50.00 $48,776.0D $48,776.00 $2,735.00 $2,735.00 52,-35.00 $0.00 $51,511M $0.00 $51511.00 S2,T35.00 le.776.00 $530.766.00 $95,000.00 S625-766.00 $75.523.00 S550.243,00 TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT $530,766.00 $95,000.00 I $625,766.00 $75,523.00 $550,243.00 P35 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 525.01032 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 03117 Page 3 o13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. AGENCY Indian River County By: Name: Joseph E. Flescher Title: Chairman Attest: Name: Title: Date: Legal Review: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: Name: Stacy L. Miller P.E. Title: Director of Transportation Development Attest: Name: Title: Date: P36 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka P.E., Public Works Director FROM: James W. Ennis P.E., County Engineer r -OP, SUBJECT: Award of RFQ No. 2016016 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Project DATE: May 10, 2017 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On October 18th, 2016 the Board of County Commissioners approved the ranking of the design professionals, for the improvements to 581h Avenue between 57th Street and CR -510, and authorized, negotiations to begin with the top ranked firm from the RFQ selection process, Bowman Consulting Group, LTO. Attached is a proposed agreement for design and construction related services for the proposed roadway project. The proposed improvements would consist of the following: 1. 58th Avenue Pavement reclamation, widening and resurfacing from 57th Street to CR -510 2. Improvements to 69th St. to conform to intersection geometry changes including the addition of left turn lanes. 3. Utility Relocation. 4. Storm water culvert replacement. 5. Signalization at the intersection of 58th Avenue and 69th Street. 6. Bike lanes throughout the 58th Avenue Corridor. 7. Other Ancillary improvements. Professional services fees are categorized as follows: 1. Bowman Consulting Group — Roadway Design, Permitting, Utility Coordination $206,546 2. Lassiter Transportation Group —Signal & Pavement Marking Design $129,560 3. Bechtol Engineering & Testing — Geotechnical & Coring Services $50,360 4. Evers Infrastructure Group — Full Depth Reclamation Design $30000 5. Ground Hound Detection Services — Underground Utility Location $8,280 FUNDING The proposed professional services listed will cost a lump sum fee of $397,746. Funding for the design is available from Secondary Roads—Road Resurfacing -58th Avenue Resurfacing -57th to CR510Account No. 10921441-053360-16023. I"Tublic Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1325 58th Avenue (57th St to CR 510) Roadway Inventory\1-Admin\agenda items\Bowman\IRC-I 325_Agenda_Bowman_20170509.doc l I: P37 Page,2 Award of Bid 2016016 BCC Agenda Item for May 23, 2017 Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed agreement with Bowman Consulting Group, LTD in the amount of $397,746 and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement. ATTACHMENTS Agreement Exhibits A - C DISTRIBUTION Bowman Consulting Group; Ltd. Purchasing Division APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR May 23.20 17 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1325 58th Avenue (57th St to CR 510) Roadway Inventory\1-Admin\agenda items\Bowman\IRC-1325_Agenda Bowman_20170509.doe P38 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT for PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ("Agreement"), entered into as of this day of , 2017 by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach FL 32960 ("COUNTY"), and BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD, a Virginian corporation authorized to do business in Florida, whose address is 3863 Centerview Drive, Suite 300, Chantilly, VA 20151 ("Consultant"): BACKGROUND RECITALS: A. In accordance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiations Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, the COUNTY solicited Requests for Statements of Qualification #2016026 for 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Project — 57th Avenue to DR -510 ("Project") attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement and made a part by reference B. As a result of its response, the County has selected Consultant to provide certain professional services relating to Public Works, ("Services") as more fully set forth in in the Scope of Services Section contained in the Request for Statements of Qualification #2016026 attached as Exhibit B to this Agreement and made a part by reference. C. Consultant has submitted a Scope of Services and Fee Proposal dated April 26, 2017 attached as Exhibit C to this Agreement and made a part by reference. D. The Consultant is willing and able to perform the Services for the COUNTY on the terms and conditions set forth below; and E. The COUNTY and the Consultant wish to enter into this Agreement for the Consultant's Services for the Project. NOW THEREFORE, in accordance with the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: GENERAL. 1.1 All professional services provided by the Consultant for the COUNTY shall be identified in Exhibits A, B and C (collectively, the "Exhibits") and performed in a timely, efficient, cost effective manner, and in accordance with the current professional standards of the applicable discipline. The Exhibits include a description of services to be performed; a statement of fees; a schedule of deliverables; proposed schedule for compensation; a budget establishing the amount of compensation to be paid with sufficient detail so as to identify all of the various elements of costs; a projected schedule for completion of the work to be performed by the Consultant; and any other P39 additional instructions or provisions relating to the specific Services authorized that does not conflict with the terms of this Agreement. 1.3 Additional services not contained in the Exhibits which would increase, decrease or which are otherwise outside the scope of Services or level of effort contemplated by the Exhibits shall be Services for which the Consultant must obtain the prior written approval of the COUNTY as provided by this Agreement. All terms for the performance of such Services must be agreed upon in a written document prior to any deviation from the terms of the Agreement, and when properly authorized and executed by both the Consultant and the COUNTY shall become an amendment to the Agreement. 1.4 The Background Recitals are true and correct and form a material part of this Agreement. 2. COUNTY OBLIGATIONS. 2.1 The COUNTY will provide the Consultant with a copy of any preliminary data or reports available as required in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, together with all available drawings, surveys, right-of-way maps, and other documents in the possession of the COUNTY pertinent to the Project. The Consultant shall satisfy itself as to accuracy of any data provided. The Consultant is responsible for bringing to the COUNTY's attention, for the COUNTY's resolution, material inconsistencies or errors in such data that come to the Consultant's attention. 2.2 The COUNTY shall arrange for access to, and make provisions for the Consultant to enter upon, public and private property (where required) as necessary for the Consultant to perform its Services, upon the timely written request of Consultant to COUNTY. 2.3 The COUNTY shall promptly execute all permit applications necessary to the Project. 2.4 The COUNTY shall examine any and all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents presented by the Consultant, and render, in writing, decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time. 2.5 Approval by the COUNTY of any of the Consultant's work, including but not limited to drawings, design specifications, written reports, or any work products of any nature whatsoever furnished hereunder, shall not in any way relieve the Consultant of responsibility for the technical accuracy and adequacy of the work. Neither the COUNTY's review, approval or acceptance of, or payment for, any of the Services furnished under this Agreement shall be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant shall be and remain liable in accordance with all applicable laws for all damages to the COUNTY caused by the negligent performance by the Consultant of any of the Services furnished under this Agreement. 2 P40 2.6 The COUNTY reserves the right to appoint one or more Project Managers for the specific Services in connection with this Agreement. The Project Manager shall: (a) act as the COUNTY's agent with respect to the Services rendered hereunder; (b) transmit instructions to and receive information from the Consultant; (c) communicate the COUNTY's policies and decisions to the Consultant regarding the Services; and (d) determine, initially, whether the Consultant is fulfilling its duties, responsibilities, and obligations hereunder. 2.7 The COUNTY shall give prompt written notice to the Consultant whenever the COUNTY observes or otherwise becomes aware of any development that affects the timing or delivery of the Consultant's Services. If the Consultant has been delayed in completing its Services through no fault or negligence of either the Consultant or any sub -consultant, and, as a result, will be unable to perform fully and satisfactorily under the provisions of this Agreement, then the Consultant shall promptly notify the Project Manager. In the COUNTY's sole discretion, and upon the submission to the COUNTY of evidence of the causes of the delay, this Agreement shall be modified in writing, subject to the COUNTY'S rights to change, terminate, or stop any or all of the Services at any time in accordance with this Agreement. 2.8 The Consultant shall not be considered in default for a failure to perform if such failure arises out of causes reasonably beyond the Consultant's control and through no fault or negligence of the Consultant. The parties acknowledge that adverse weather conditions, acts of God, or other unforeseen circumstances of a similar nature, may necessitate modifications to this Agreement. If such conditions and circumstances do in fact occur, then the COUNTY and Consultant shall mutually agree, in writing, to the modifications to be made to this Agreement. 3. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONSULTANT. 3.1 The Consultant agrees to perform all necessary professional engineering, project design, construction phase services, and other Services in connection with the assigned Project(s) as set forth in this Agreement. 3.2 The Consultant will endeavor not to duplicate any previous work done on any Project. Before beginning work, the Consultant shall consult with the COUNTY to clarify and define the COUNTY's requirements for the Project. 3.3 The - Consultant agrees to complete the Project within the time frame specified in the Work Order. 3.4 The Consultant will maintain an adequate staff of qualified personnel. 3.5 The Consultant will comply with all present and future federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, policies, codes, and guidelines applicable to the Services performed under this Agreement. 3.6 The Consultant, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that: (1) in connection with the furnishing of Services to the 3 P41 COUNTY hereunder, no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in regard to the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement on the grounds of such person's race, color, creed, national origin, religion, physical disability, age or sex; and (2) the Consultant shall comply with all existing requirements concerning discrimination imposed by any and all applicable local, state, and federal rules, regulations, or guidelines, as such rules, regulations, or guidelines may be from time to time amended. 3.7 The Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, procure and keep in full force, effect, and good standing any and all necessary licenses, registrations, certificates, permits, and any and all other authorizations as are required by local, state, or federal law, in order for the Consultant to render its Services as described in this Agreement. The Consultant shall also require all sub -consultants to comply by contract with the provisions of this section. 3.8 The Consultant will prepare all necessary sketches and completed application forms to accompany the COUNTY's applications for any required federal, state, or local permits. 3.9 The Consultant will cooperate fully with the COUNTY in order that all phases of the work may be properly scheduled and coordinated. 3.10 The Consultant will cooperate and coordinate with other COUNTY consultants, as directed by the COUNTY. 3.11 The Consultant shall report the status of the Services under this Agreement to the County Project Manager upon request and hold all drawings, calculations and related work open to the inspection of the County Project Manager or his authorized agent at any time, upon reasonable request. 3.12 All documents, reports, tracings, plans, specifications, field books, survey notes and information, maps, contract documents, and other data developed by the Consultant for the purpose of this Agreement, are and shall remain the property of the COUNTY. The foregoing items will be created, maintained, updated, and provided in the format specified by the County. When all work contemplated under this Agreement is complete, all of the above data shall be delivered to the County Project Manager. 3.13 The Consultant will confer with the COUNTY during the further development of improvements for which the Consultant has provided design or other services, and the Consultant will interpret plans and other documents; correct errors and omissions; and prepare any necessary plan revisions not involving a change in the scope of the work required, at no additional cost to the COUNTY, within thirty (30) calendar days of notice by the COUNTY, or upon a determination of the Consultant of the existence of such errors or omissions, whichever event shall first occur. The foregoing is not intended to include construction management services provided by the Consultant. 4 P42 3.14 The Consultant agrees to maintain complete and accurate books and records ("Books"), in accordance with sound accounting principles and standards for all Services, costs, and expenditures under this Agreement. The Books shall identify the Services rendered during each month of the Agreement and the date and type of each Project -related expense. The COUNTY shall have the right, at any reasonable time and through any of its designated agents or representatives, to inspect and audit the Books for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of any invoice. The CONSULTANT shall retain the Books, and make them available to the COUNTY as specified above, until the later of three (3) years after the date of termination of this Agreement, or such longer time if required by any federal, state, or other governmental law, regulation, or grant requirement. 3.15 The Consultant shall not assign or transfer any work under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. When applicable and upon receipt of such consent from the COUNTY, the Consultant shall cause the names of the engineering and surveying firms responsible for the major portions of each separate specialty of the work to be inserted on the reports or other data. 3.16 All documents, including but not limited to drawings and specifications, prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement are related exclusively to the Services described herein and are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by the COUNTY or others on any other project. Reuse of any document or drawing shall be at the COUNTY's own risk. The Consultant shall not be held liable for any modifications made to the documents by others. 4. TERM: TIME FOR COMPLETION. 4.1 The time for completion of the Project shall be defined in the Exhibits. 5. COMPENSATION. 5.1 The COUNTY shall pay to the Consultant the mutually agreed professional fee of THREE HUNDRED NINETY SEVEN THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY SIX DOLLARS ($397,746.00) for Services rendered for the Project, to be paid in monthly installments or on a deliverable basis, as set forth in the Exhibits. Duly certified invoices, in triplicate, phased as per the Exhibits, shall be submitted to the County Project Manager, in detail sufficient for proper prepayment and post payment audit. Upon submittal of a proper invoice the County Project Manager will determine if the tasks or portions thereof have been satisfactorily completed. Upon a determination of satisfactory completion, the County Project Manager will authorize payment to be made. All payments for services shall be made to the Consultant by the COUNTY in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, as may be amended from time to time (Section 218.70, Florida Statutes, et seq.). 5.1.1 The Consultant acknowledges and agrees that it will not be reimbursed for any travel associated with its Services on this Project. 5 P43 5.1.2 The COUNTY shall make direct payment of all permit fees paid to regulatory agencies for approvals directly attributable to the Services under the Project. These permit fees do not include those permits required for any construction contractor. 5.2 The COUNTY may at any time notify the Consultant of requested changes to the Services under an existing Work Order, and thereupon the COUNTY and the Consultant shall execute a mutually agreeable amended Work Order or a new Work Order. 5.3 The COUNTY shall have the sole right to reduce or eliminate, in whole or in part, any portion of the Services under the Exhibits at any time and for any reason, upon written notice to the Consultant specifying the nature and extent of the reduction. In such event, the Consultant shall be paid for the Services already performed and also for the Services remaining to be done and not reduced or eliminated, upon submission of invoices as set forth in this Agreement. 5.4 The COUNTY may, at any time and for any reason, direct the Consultant to suspend Services, in whole or in part under this Agreement. Such direction shall be in writing, and shall specify the period during which Services shall be stopped. The Consultant shall resume its Services upon the date specified, or upon such other date as the COUNTY may thereafter specify in writing. Where the COUNTY has suspended the services under this Agreement for a period in excess of six (6) months, the compensation of Consultant for such suspended Services may be subject to modification. The period during which the Services are stopped by the COUNTY shall be added to the time of performance of this. Agreement. 6. ADDITIONAL WORK. 6.1 If services in addition to the Services provided hereunder are required or desired by the County in connection with the Project, the COUNTY may, at the sole option of the COUNTY: separately obtain same outside of this Agreement; or request the Consultant to provide, either directly by the Consultant or by a sub -consultant, such additional services by a new Work Order or by a written amendment to a specific Work Order. 7. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION. 7.1 The Consultant shall not commence work on this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required under this Agreement and such insurance has been approved by the County's Risk Manager. 7.2 Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary. 7.3 All required insurance policies shall be placed with insurers licensed to do business in Florida and with a Best's rating of A VII or better. 7.4 The insurance policies procured shall be occurrence forms, not claims made policies with the exception of professional liability. D P44 7.5 A certificate of insurance shall be provided to the County's Risk Manager for review and approval, ten (10) days prior to commencement of any work under this Agreement. The COUNTY shall be named as an additional insured on all policies except workers' compensation and professional liability. 7.6 The insurance companies selected shall send written verification to the County Risk Manager that they will provide 30 days prior written notice to the County Risk Manager of its intent to cancel or modify any required policies of insurance. 7.7 Consultant shall include all sub -consultants as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each sub -consultant. All coverages for sub -consultants shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. 7.8 The COUNTY, by and through its Risk Manager, reserves the right periodically to review any and all policies of insurance and reasonably to adjust the limits of coverage required hereunder, from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. In such event, the COUNTY shall provide the Consultant with separate written notice of such adjusted limits and Consultant shall comply within thirty (30) days of receipt thereof. The failure by Consultant to provide such additional coverage shall constitute a default by Consultant and shall be grounds for termination of this Agreement by the COUNTY. 7.9 The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the COUNTY, and its officers and employees, from liabilities, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Consultant and other persons employed or utilized by the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement. 8. TERMINATION. 8.1 This Agreement may be terminated: (a) by the COUNTY, for any reason, upon thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the Consultant; or (b) by the Consultant, for any reason, upon thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the COUNTY; or (c) by the mutual Agreement of the parties; or d) as may otherwise be provided below. In the event of the termination of this Agreement, any liability of one party to the other arising out of any Services rendered, or for any act or event occurring prior to the termination, shall not be terminated or released. 8.2 In the event of termination by the COUNTY, the COUNTY's sole obligation to the Consultant shall be payment for those portions of satisfactorily completed work previously authorized by approved Work Order. Such payment shall be determined on the basis of the hours of work performed by the Consultant, or the percentage of work complete as estimated by the Consultant and agreed upon by the COUNTY up to the time of termination. In the event of such termination, the COUNTY may, without penalty or other obligation to the Consultant, elect to employ other persons to perform the same or similar services. 7 P45 8.3 The obligation to provide services under this Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days prior written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party. 8.4 In the event that the Consultant merges with another company, becomes a subsidiary of, or makes any other substantial change in structure, the COUNTY reserves the right to terminate this Agreement in accordance with its terms. 8.5 In the event of termination of this Agreement, the Consultant agrees to surrender any and all documents prepared by the Consultant for the COUNTY in connection with this Agreement, 8.6 The COUNTY may terminate this Agreement for refusal by the Consultant to allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119 Florida Statutes and made or received by the Consultant in conjunction with this Agreement. 8.7 The COUNTY may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part if the Consultant submits a false invoice to the COUNTY. 9. TRUTH -IN -NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE• CONTINGENCY FEES. 9.1 Execution of this Agreement by the Consultant shall act as the execution of a truth -in -negotiation certificate certifying that the wage rates and costs used to determine the compensation provided for in this Agreement are accurate, complete and current as of the date of the Agreement and no higher than those charged the Consultant's most favored customer for the same or substantially similar service. The wage rates and costs shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums should the COUNTY determine that the wage rates and costs were increased due to inaccurate, incomplete or noncurrent wage rates or due to inaccurate representations of fees paid to outside consultants. The COUNTY shall exercise its rights under this "Certificate" within one (1) year following final payment. COUNTY has the authority and right to audit Consultant's records under this provision. The COUNTY does not hereby waive any other right it may have pursuant to Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, as it may be from time -to -time amended. 9.2 Pursuant to the Consultants' Competitive Negotiations Act, F. S. section 287.055, the Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant any fee, commission, percentage fee, gifts or any other considerations, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach of violation of this provision, the COUNTY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability and, at its discretion, to deduct from the contract price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. E-1 P46 10. MISCELLANOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Independent Contractor. It is specifically understood and acknowledged by the parties hereto that the Consultant or employees or subconsultants of the Consultant are in no way to be considered employees of the COUNTY, but are independent contractors performing solely under the terms of the Agreement and not otherwise. 10.2 Merger; Modification. This Agreement incorporates and includes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements, or understandings of any nature whatsoever concerning the subject matter of the Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior or contemporaneous representations or agreements, whether oral or written. No alteration, change, or modification of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the Consultant and the COUNTY. 10.3 Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement, including all attachments hereto, shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Agreement shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 10.4 Remedies; No Waiver. All remedies provided in this Agreement shall be deemed cumulative and additional, and not in lieu or exclusive of each other or of any other remedy available to either party, at law or in equity. Each right, power and remedy of the parties provided for in this Agreement shall be cumulative and concurrent and shall be in addition to every other right, power or remedy provided for in this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. The failure of either party to insist upon compliance by the other party with any obligation, or exercise any remedy, does not waive the right to so in the event of a continuing or subsequent delinquency or default. A party's waver of one or more defaults does not constitute a waver of any other delinquency or default. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions of this Agreement, each party shall bear its own costs. 10.5 Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable for the remainder of this Agreement, then the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. 10.6 Availability of Funds. The obligations of the COUNTY under this Agreement are subject to the availability of funds lawfully appropriated for its purpose by the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County. I P47 10.7 No Pledge of Credit. The Consultant shall not pledge the COUNTY's credit or make it a guarantor of payment or surety for any contract, debt, obligation, judgment, lien or any form of indebtedness. 10.8 Public Records. The Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (Public Records Law) in connection with this Agreement. 10.9 Notices: Any notice, request, demand, consent, approval, or other communication required or permitted by this Agreement shall be given or made in writing and shall be served, as elected by the party giving such notice, by any of the following methods: (a) Hand delivery to the other party; (b) Delivery by commercial overnight courier service; or (c) Mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested at the addresses of the parties shown below: County: Indian River County Attn: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E. 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960-3365 Facsimile: (772) 770-5143 Consultant: Bowman Consulting Group, LTD Attn: Robert A. Hickey 3863 Centerview Drive, Suite 300 Chantilly, VA 20151 Fax: 703-481-1490 Email rhickey@bowmancg.com Notices shall be effective when received at the address as specified above. Facsimile transmission is acceptable notice effective when received, provided, however, that facsimile transmissions received (i.e., printed) after 5:00 p.m. or on weekends or holidays, will be deemed received on the next day that is not a weekend day or a holiday. The original of the notice must additionally be mailed. Either party may change its address, for the purposes of this section, by written notice to the other party given in accordance with the provisions of this section. 10.10 Survival. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each obligation in this Agreement to be performed by Consultant shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 10.11 Construction. The headings of the sections of this Agreement are for the purpose of convenience only, and shall not be deemed to expand, limit, or modify the provisions contained in such Sections. All pronouns and any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to the masculine, feminine or neuter, singular or plural, as the identity of the party or parties may require. The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that each was properly represented by counsel and this Agreement was negotiated and drafted at arm's-length so that the judicial rule of construction to the effect that a legal P48 document shall be construed against the draftsperson shall be inapplicable to this Agreement 10.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original copy and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. P49 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD Date_ 5-1 C) - ZZ)) -T Witness: By Printed r&m�e A��-A Y,,? 01 W Ork S 12 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By its Board of County Commissioners By Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Date Approved by BCC: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court And Comptroller By Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney P50 00 c o n - IV G Prod j r)ot fession-al Statem Wc of Qualificat. 58th AvenuefiIons 57th S Pavenle treet to CR_ nt Reclan',ati 5 10 (FDO'r OP Fft Resurfacon l Indian River COun . tv SCM NO. 436416-11ngPrOject RC Bowman c PrOject Me/bo Ons�U/t'ng Gro Na 132.5) Urne off,. UP, Ltd. 44So W E ice Me/bournea, FL 32934B/l/d, Suite 232 Eric L Flavell, .12 �aVell(,)Rru— PSI P52 Bowman C O N S U L T I N G July 29, 2016 Ms. Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager Indian River County Purchasing Division 1800 2711 Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Melbourne, FL Office 4450 West Eau Gallie Blvd, Suite 232 Melbourne, FL 32934 Ph: 321.255.5434 Subject: Statement of Qualifications for 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Project — 57th Street to CR -510 (FDOT SOP FM No. 436416-1) (IRC Project No. 1325) Dear Ms. Hyde, Bowman Consulting Group is pleased to present our Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for your review and to P-1 express our interest in this project. We are excited about the opportunity to work with the county on this state of the art street reclamation and improvement project. Bowman has the professional qualifications to assist the county with proposed scope of services as listed in the RFQ. These qualifications include design experience performing street modification and reclamation, quality professional services, proven management ability, and integrated quality control procedures. We have a history of performing our services on time and within budget, and will require minimal direction from staff to perform these services. The enclosed information describes our background and experience, and how knowledge gained from our f I performance with similar Projects will be applied to accomplish the county's road improvement project. Based (: on the scope of work listed in the RFQ, we are pleased to team with the following consultants: Lassiter Transportation Group Evers Infrastructure Group Bechtol Engineering and Testing Thank you for taking the time to review our qualifications. The undersigned have authority to make representations on behalf of the firm. This Statement of Qualifications has been made without collusion with any i other person or entity submitting a response to this Request for Qualifications. Sincerely, Eric L. Flav , PE Project Manager Bowman Consulting 321.270.8993 eflavell _bowmanconsultina.com Erik Juliano, PE, PSM i Vice President / Branch Manager Bowman Consulting 321.270.8981 ejuliano bowmanconsulting.com 3 i I� P53 Encl. One (1) hard -copy original (marked "ORIGINAL") and signed in blue ink Five (5) hard -copies (marked "COPY") Sworn statement on Disclosure of Relationships as per Section 105.08 of the Indian River County Code 4 P54 Table of Contents Table of Contents Firm Overview Project Team Organization Chart Introduction to the Team Team Member Resumes Project Approach & Management Approach Management Consultant Capabilities Project Schedule References Additional Information / Forms Statement on Litigation Professional Engineering Certifications Eric Flavell, P.E. Lucas Anthony, P.E. Corporate Florida Registration Sworn statement of Disclosure of Relationship Firm's Insurance Form 5 5 7 8 33 41 45 47 51 P55 11 P55 Firm Overview Background Bowman is a national firm with offices throughout the US and promotes personal, development and professionalism which is reflected with the high number of registered professionals and professionals in training on our staff. Bowman provides civil engineering, planning, surveying, environmental, landscape architecture, pipeline design, water / wastewater engineering, and transportation services to a variety of public and private markets throughout the United States. The work of the firm includes commercial, industrial, educational, residential, retail, health care, recreational, utility, municipal, and federal projects. In 2012, Bowman Consulting expanded their market into Florida by merging with Creech Engineers, Inc. Creech Engineers was a successful full service civil engineering and surveying firm focusing on the Space Coast and the Treasure Coast, and working throughout the State of Florida for 25 years. They grew an extensive client portfolio that encompasses municipal clients, residential developers, as well as big box corporate businesses. The Florida offices include Melbourne, Stuart, Port 'St. Lucie, Ft. Lauderdale, Orlando and Tallahassee. The Creech Melbourne Office was established in 1999 and we have been a local firm working in Melbourne Area for over 15 years. Bowman Consulting Group will be the prime consultant with Eric L. Flavell, P.E. as project manager and the single point of contact for the county. This work will be performed out of our Melbourne office. The Melbourne office has 22 people, including six registered engineers. Melbourne Office Our Melbourne Office is located near the 1-95 and Eau Gallie intersection, with easy access to the 1-95, and we can respond and be at the county offices within 45 minutes. In addition to our key personnel at the Melbourne office, we have adequate staff to support and augment the team as required for the work. The Melbourne Office staff breakdown is as follows: Melbourne Office Staff Position Number Registered Engineer 6 Registered Surveyor 1 Engineer in Training 5 Engineering Designer 3 Survey Field 4 Support Staff 4 Total 23 Other nearby Bowman offices include our Port St. Lucie and Stuart offices. Subconsultants The Lassiter Transportation Group (LTG) will be performing their transportation engineering work out of their Melbourne Office. This office is managed by Mr. Gil Ramirez, PE, the designated transportation engineer for this contract and he was the former traffic operations manager for Brevard County. Evers Infrastructure Group is located in Vero Beach and Bechtol Engineering and Testing, Inc. is located in Deland. 7 Project Team Bowman Consulting Group, teamed with Lassiter Transportation Group, Evers Infrastructure Group and Bechtol Engineering and Testing, Inc. has the diverse experience needed to provide the technical and engineering expertise to successfully plan and design the county's pavement reclamation and corridor improvement project. Proposed Organizational Structure The following organization chart illustrates how we propose to staff the design team. These key individuals will be assigned to the project and will follow it through fruition. They will be supported by the rest of our office staff as needed. Oreanization Chart We have assemble a team of seasoned and accomplished professionals to provide these services. A benefit of selecting Bowman is we have multiple offices in this area and those resources are available, as needed. We 8 P58 Person: Task: Responsibilities: Eric Flavell Project Manager Overall pro6ect manager and -senior engineer for road design andspecs Lucas AnthonyProject Engineer Permitting and utility coordination Chris Evers Pavement Specialist FDR issues and project im lementation Gil Ramirez Transportation Engr Transportation manager, funding compliance and signal design Mark Neiman Transportation En r I Geometric layout and design, ADA compliance Randal Stormant I Geotechnical Engr I FDR testing,design andspecifications We have assemble a team of seasoned and accomplished professionals to provide these services. A benefit of selecting Bowman is we have multiple offices in this area and those resources are available, as needed. We 8 P58 see this team as the core personnel performing the services and we will augment this group with other qualified staff, if and as needed arises. Introduction to Key Personnel: To form a successful team requires management ability, qualified personnel and a common goal. We have worked with Lassiter Transportation Group for over four years and have an established relationship with them and they share the same approach to work and quality, and we have the ability to work together seamlessly. We have added Bechtol Engineering and Testing and Evers Infrastructure Group because of their extensive experience with Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) as well as other pavement recycling methods. In this section we introduce each of our key team members and the skill sets that they have to apply to the design of the project. We also highlight the types of tasks that each team member will focus on. At the end of this section, we have included each team member's resume for your review. Eric Flavell, P.E. — Project Manager & Senior Design Engineer As project manager Mr. Flavell will be the single point of contact for the county and have overall responsibility of the project. He brings over 30 years of road design and construction experience to this project. He will oversee all aspectes E<=:; of the design teams work and is familiar with what each team member needs =' to produce for a complete and integrated design. He will draw on his road design and pavement maintenance experience to see that the project challenges are addressed during the course of the design process. Mr. Flavell has worked on a variety of road settings including downtown, rural and neighborhood. Each has it own nuance and these considerations including how the work can be phased and the importance of project sequencing go a long way to reducing impacts to the traveling public. Mr. Flavell is a registered professional engineer in four states, including Florida. He recently moved to Florida and is in the process of getting FDOT Pre -qualifications for Catagories 3.1, 3.2, 10.1 and 13.6. Through his accomplishments, he has been elected to Fellow in the American Society of Civil Engineers, and Fellow in the Institue for the Advancement of Engineering. Lucas Anthony, P.E.—_Project Engineer (Permitting and Utility Coordination) Mr. Anthony brings over 18 years of engineering and project management experience to the project. The bulk of this experience has been with land development projects focusing on big box projects such as Walmart. These types of projects are the most demanding from a permitting and utility coordination perspective.. Time is always critical to successful development, and permitting is typically the critical path to project delivery. The most reliable way to maintain an established project schedule and process permits in an expedient manner is to develop trusting relationships with the various overseeing agencies. Understanding the process, pre -submittal meetings, preparation of complete packages and candid discussions throughout the process, are what expedite permitting. L � Mr. Anthony has significant experience with following functions: Due diligence research of existing conditions, permit requirements, concurrency, local land development regulations, drainage and environmental conditions 9 P59 • Assessment of client requirements and objectives • Utility Coordination • Pre -application meetings with various municipal and regulatory agencies • Coordination with various consultants (environmental, legal, geotechnical, traffic, architects, land planners) • Conceptual and final site plan, engineering design and cost estimates • Access management and offsite roadway improvements (traffic lights, road widening, turn lane, intersection improvements) • Permitting through local, state and federal regulatory agencies • Attendance and client representation at public meetings • Construction observation and certification Chris Evers — Infrasturcture Specialist Mr. Evers is the President of Evers Infrastructure Group LLC, a company he formed in 2012 after spending eleven years with E.J. Breneman a large project highway contractor specializing in alternative pavement rehabilitation. Chris has 20 years experience in the highway construction industry. Evers IG serves the highway industry in a number of capacities. The company works as a sub - consultant to Consulting Engineering firms providing specialized consulting services on alternative processes such as Full Depth Reclamation and Cold In - Place Recycling. Mr. Evers is the Past President of the American Public Works Association Florida Chapter after having served as President -Elect, Vice President and as Chair of the 2012 Annual Meeting and Trade Show. Chris was also instrumental in the founding of the Florida Pavement Preservation Council and sat on the Cold In -Place Recycling Sub -Committee for the Asphalt Reclaiming and Recycling Association an active speaker for APWA, FACERS, FAC, ASCE, ARRA and the Florida Airports Council. . He has been Mr. Evers has been very active in advancing the use of Full Depth Reclamation and Cold In -Place Recycling technologies here in Florida. He taught the Full Depth Reclamation Class for the Florida T2 LTAP Center from 2004 — 2007. He has been personally involved in FDR and CIR projects encompassing hundreds of lane miles. He was involved in Indian River County's first Cold In -Place Recycling project on Oslo Road and CR 512 in 2004. Recognized as an expert in the processes he has worked on seven County projects of similar scope with varying engineering firms all of which were SCRAP and SCOP funded. As a sub -consultant on those projects his involvement helped insure the projects were a success. Mr. Evers will .serve as liaison and advisor to Bowman Consulting Group for this project, primarily responsible for specification, mix design and pre -project advisory and oversight. Gil Ramirez, P.E. — Transportation Engineer (Funding & Signals) As the lead traffic engineer for this project, Mr. Ramirez will provide services related to traffic signal design, removal, and replacement. Throughout the course of his career Mr. Ramirez has served as a traffic signalization engineer for numerous projects. Since joining LTG in 2013, Mr. Ramirez has provided signalization services for at least 30 projects. Prior to joining LTG, Mr. Ramirez served as the Traffic Operations Manager for Brevard County for 7 years. This experience has provided Mr. Ramirez with an in-depth, hands-on knowledge and understanding of the workings and transportation related requirements of the public sector, allowing him to work seamlessly as an extension of Indian River County. In his previous position at Brevard County and as the Office Manager/Lead Engineer in LTG's Melbourne office, Mr. Ramirez works directly with FDOT and FDOT funded projects on a consistent basis and is familiar with all expectations and requirements needed to ensure a smooth project from start to finish. 10 P60 Mr. Mark P. Neiman, P.E. — Transportation Engineer (Geometries and Road Design) With over 40 years of experience, will provide left turn lane and signing and pavement marking engineering design services for this contract.. Mr. Neiman's experience includes the design, permitting, and management of roadways and pedestrian facilities (minor and major) across the state. Mr. Neiman has consistently delivered quality projects to private, municipal and state entities throughout his career. His experience working with Florida Department of Transportation will ensure that this roadway project is completed according to accepted standards in Indian River County. In addition, Mr. Neiman is prequalified with the FDOT in workgroups 3.1 -Minor Highway Design, 3.2 -Major Highway Design, and 7.1 -Signing, Pavement Marking and Channelization. Compliance with the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) has been an integral part of Mr. Neiman's career. Meeting ADA standards' and requirements is an important part of each and every design project. Mr. Neiman is currently assisting the City of Daytona Beach with a multi-million dollar ADA transition plan for compliance. Mr. Randal Stormant, — Geotechnical Engineer (FDR Mix Design and Specifications) Bechtol Engineering and Testing, Inc. (BET) has performed mix design testing/development and/or in -field production testing for hundreds of successful roadway rehabilitation projects throughout Florida and the. southeast. Project specifications, provided by the many different governing agencies, pertaining to mix design development and in -field production testing relative to Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) have varied dramatically. Cities, Counties, The State of Florida and other States have many conflicting ideas regarding FDR mix design, testing and structural coefficient methodology. Project mix design sampling and testing must be preceded by a clear understanding of the owner's desired final outcome (traffic level, budget, life span, grade, etc.). An initial sampling plan must account for varying site i conditions and roadway section parent materials. Typically cores or saw cut windows are removed from the existing roadway at intervals that will provide sufficient material quantity to perform the necessary analysis and testing. Multiple mix designs may be required for a single project if the variance in the structural performance (j and add mixture compatibility characteristics of the parent materials differ significantly throughout the project I limits. For FDR projects, BET recommends laboratory design test procedures that can be duplicated later in the field during production level testing. Testing may include gradation analysis, unconfined compressive strength, Marshall stability, maximum specific gravity, bulk specific gravity, proctor, in-place density and thickness. Key Team Member Resumes: The following resumes delve into specific project experience each team member brings to this project: 11 12 -- P62 Bowman C O N S U L T I N G Eric Flavell, P.E., F-ASCE Project Manager, Municipal Engineering Mr. Flavell brings over 35 years of experience with municipal engineering projects to the team. The bulk of his f ' experience was in California where he was an owner in a consulting firm for 27 years. This experience includes master planning, studies, design, and construction services of a variety of public improvements. Besides engineering (drawings and specifications) he is adept at preparing special reports, feasibility studies, capital is improvement alternatives analysis, scheduling, schedule analysis, cost estimating, and developing budgets. Academic Credentials BS Civil Engineering, Oregon State University, 1978 BS Industrial Engineering, Oregon State University, 1978 i Professional Registrations Professional Engineer — Civil Engineering California, 33000 (1981) Nevada, 6506 (1983) Oregon, 15394 (1991) Florida, 76826 (2013) a Professional Achievements • American Society of Civil Engineers, Fellow • Institute for the Advancement of Engineers, Fellow Professional Affiliations • American Society of Civil Engineers • American Public Works Association Principal Areas of Expertise • Program Management (multiple concurrent projects) • Project Management • Developing and Monitoring Budgets 0 Quality Assurance/Quality Control e Studies and Alternative Evaluations a Master Planning • Roadway / Parking Lot Design • Pavement Maintenance Design • Water Pumping, Distribution and Storage Design ' 0 Wastewater Collection and Pumping Design Public Facilities Site Grading and Drainage Design • Parks Design Construction Administration (Specific experience with Roads, Public Site Development, WWTP, WTP, Pump Stations, Pipelines, Water Tanks, Pavement Maintenance Treatments) 13 Cate -gory l l: Minor Highway Design Bus Stop - City of Stuart, FL Mr. Flavell was the design engineer and engineer of record for ADA compliant Bus Stops. The bus stop was designed to accommodate sites without curbs and was developed as a standard so it can be replicated at other locations around the City. He prepared the design, specifications, bid schedule and opinion of construction cost. Design Completed in 2015 Las Posas Road Reprofiling at Ventura Blvd — City of Camarillo, CA Mr. Flavell served as the principal in charge, managed the project and was the engineer of record. The Las Posas Road and Ventura Boulevard intersection is the busiest intersection in the City of Camarillo, CA. The intersection started off as a rural farm road. Over the years, multiple commercial developments widened the intersection to the point that Las Posas Road is eight lanes and Ventura Boulevard is seven lanes at the intersection. Through the course of widenings the work was pieced in with existing portions of road and the result was pavement that did not properly drain. The project included 1,600 feet of Las Posas Road and three intersections. A grid analysis was performed to locate high and low spots on the road and this information was included on the drawings showing where leveling courses were required and profile milling required. Once the reprofiling was completed the entire project was overlaid with A.C. pavement. Project completed in 2012 Miller & Cook Streets — City of Santa Maria, CA Mr. Flavell served as principal in charge, project manager and engineer of record for this project. Miller and Cook Streets front two sides of the town center mall and city hall. This was a high profile project prompted by the deterioration of the street and over growth of poorly selected landscaping materials. The street landscaping was originally constructed in the 1980s and the trees selected were Pine and Liquid Amber which have aggressive root systems and caused substantial damage to the road, curbs and walkways. The project consisted of removing and replacing most of the landscaping, removing and replacing failed curb, replacing all the walkways and meandering sidewalk adjacent to the mall, correcting drainage problems, laning modifications, modifications to the signal and overlaying the streets. The project included wheel chair ramps, modifications to driveways to make them ADA compliant and repairs to sidewalks. Landscaping was a primary component of this project. To reduce the impact of removing mature trees, a number of the original trees that were having the least impact on the existing improvements were left. The approach is to remove these trees over 5 year increments as the new landscaping matures. Project completed 2007 Old Town Sidewalks, City of Thousand Oaks, CA Mr. Flavell served as principal in charge, project manager and engineer of record for this project. The issues on this project were drainage control as the current condition drains street water through the adjacent properties and drains to a natural drainage course at the back of the properties. The terrain is hilly and as such, one side of the street will have houses well above the road and the other side will have houses well below the road. This results in complicated conforms to existing driveways and walkways (steps) to accommodate the new sidewalk. Walls were required on a substantial portion of the project that are retaining or turndown to control grade differences. The City owns a 50' right-of-way and the road is typically centered in 30' of the right-of-way. This means that over time the residents have encroached into the right-of-way with private improvements. This obviously complicated the design and caused concerns with property owners. These issues along with pedestrian level lighting, preserving a heritage oak in the middle of the road, and working around neighborhood icons within the right-of-way were all included in the design. Project Completed in 2013 Pancho Road Reconstruction Project — City of Camarillo Mr. Flavell was principal in charge, project manager and engineer of record for this project. Pancho Road starts off as a five lane arterial and ends up as a two lane rural road. The project is one mile long. A portion of the road has been developed and the remaining portion is slated to be developed over the next 20 years. The road was in very poor shape with a lot of pavement failure. There are no bypass streets which means the street has to be kept open. Pulverization was selected to reconstruct the street. The much of the milled material was used to build up the road crown and improve drainage. The street grindings were mixed with the top 4" of base material and an A.C. section of 4" of %" and 2" of %z" mix finished the road. The work was done in sections and a phasing plan was developed to keep the road open to traffic at all times. Project Completed in 2015 14 P64 Cateaory 3.2: Major Highway Design Lower State Street Revitalization Project — City of Santa Barbara, CA Award Winning Project— Concrete Industry Award of Excellence for Outstanding Paving Project Mr. Flavell served as principal in charge, project manager and engineer of record. Lower State Street is a gateway to the City of Santa Barbara and was once HWY 1. This was a joint Public Works and Redevelopment Agency project. The existing streets were in poor condition and the soil in the area has an R -value of between 5 and 10. The value of 5 is the lowest value that can be calculated, meaning that these soils have very marginal support capacity. Because of the marginal soils, the decision was made to construct Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) streets that have the ability to bridge poor soils, with the benefits of longevity and low maintenance. One of the drawbacks is anytime utility repairs are made, the result is a substantial scar. Thought was given to protecting the longevity of the streets and all utilities (power, communications, and gas) and support infrastructure such as water and drainage were relocated to under the sidewalks. This project required coordination with businesses, meeting discretionary review board requirements and coordination with the utility companies. An extensive outreach program was implemented that continued through the construction of the project due to the number of stake holders involved. Project completed 1991 Santa Barbara Airport North of Hollister Infrastructure Improvements — City of Santa Barbara, CA Mr. Flavell was principal in charge, project manager of design, engineer of record and construction manager for this redevelopment of 25 acres that is zoned commercial and light industrial and still had the original infrastructure from the WWII Marine Air Base. A key component was master planning the lots and streets to take advantage of existing facilities and structures to remain and provide for future improvements. All utilities were replaced and upgraded including water, sewer, power, communications, gas and the streets and drainage facilities reconstructed. This project required a master planning effort to set the control grades and establish road vertical alignment that would provide drainage, most of the streets are designed at 0.20% slope, and conform to the existing driveways and building doorways, and comply with ADA. The master planning also allowed a more detailed fiscal analysis to be performed that resulted in the project being broken up into phases that could be constructed with available funding. The length of time from master plan to complete construction was eight years and included three construction contracts. We had to use elliptical pipe, and multiple pipe banks and specially design low head junction structures to move the water through the system. There was so little available head that all the junction structures had custom channel filleting to reduce the inlet and outlet headloss. There was so little cover that the pipes were put under the sidewalks to gain the 6° height of the curb to provide cover over the pipelines. This system has been tested with several significant rain events and received compliments from the City on how well the drainage system functions, compared to the condition before the improvements were made. The streets were dry despite heavy rain events. At the time Planning was recommending small curb returns and narrowing of streets as a design philosophy. Due to the intended use, we were able to persuade the discretionary approval bodies to allow 48' wide streets and 25' curb returns. This design allowed for the free flow of truck traffic and adequate street width to provide on street truck parking and Class 3 bike lanes. The project also included the signalization of the Hollister / Lopez intersection, a previously non -signalized intersection. The project included development of two parks. Project Completed in 2003 Cate_aory 10.1: Roadway CEI Downtown Area Street Project — City of Santa Barbara, CA Mr. Flavell was principal in charge and construction manager for this 1.8 million dollar street widening and beautification project with signals, medians, decorative sidewalks, landscaping. Carrillo Street is a primary gateway to downtown Santa Barbara from US 101. Overhead utilities were undergrounded and upgrades to existing utilities were made. The project was phased to reduce impacts to this mixed used neighborhood of high end hotels, high end commercial retail including Sax Fifth Avenue, and transportation hub. CEI included weekly meetings, testing and review of test results, schedule review, MOT review, coordination with residents and businesses, quantities confirmation, pay request evaluation, laydown inspection, punchlist and corrections. Project Completed in 1992 Santa Barbara Airport North of Hollister Infrastructure Improvements — City of Santa Barbara, CA Mr. Flavell was principal in charge, project manager of design, engineer of record and construction manager for this redevelopment of 25 acres that is zoned commercial and light industrial and still had the original infrastructure from the 15 P65 WWII Marine Air Base. A key component was master planning the lots and streets to take advantage of existing facilities and structures to remain and provide for future improvements. All utilities were replaced and upgraded including water, sewer, power, communications, gas and the streets and drainage facilities reconstructed. The length of time from master plan to complete construction was eight years and included three construction contracts. Contract one included all utility upgrades for cable, telephone, power and gas. The second contract included replacement of the water distribution system and sewer collection system. The third contract was for streets, curb, gutter and sidewalks, drainage collection and conveyance and the signalized intersection. The project also included the signalization of the Hollister / Lopez intersection, a previously non -signalized intersection. CEI included weekly meetings, testing and review of test results, schedule review, MOT review, coordination with residents and businesses, quantities confirmation, pay request evaluation, underground inspection, drainage structures, box culvert, subgrade preparation, laydown inspection, punchlist and corrections. Project Completed in 2003 Annual Pavement Maintenance Projects —Various Cities Mr. Flavell was principal in charge and project manager and engineer of record for these annual pavement maintenance projects. Full services included visual pavement evaluation, evaluation of alternative treatment methods, opinion of construction costs by treatment, scheduling, life cycle cost evaluation, design of pavement repairs and surface treatments, field marking of remove and replace locations, and full construction administration and inspection of the work. Projects typically included three separate construction contracts which were pavement point repairs, crack sealing with surface treatments and overlay. Surface treatments could include one or several of road slurry seal (Types I, 11 and III), Micro Surfacing, chip seal, cape seal, and rejuvenating cape seal. Overlay contracts could include mill and overlay and pulverization and overlay. Damaged concrete improvements such as curb and gutter, spandrels, cross gutters, tree root pruning and root barriers were often included. CEI included weekly meetings, testing and review of test results, schedule review, MOT review, coordination with residents and businesses, quantities confirmation, pay request evaluation, laydown inspection, punchlist and corrections. He performed these projects until he moved to Florida for the following agencies: City of Santa Barbara (1998-2013), City of Goleta (2006-2013), City of Camarillo (2008-2013), and City of Thousand Oaks (2013). The following are the construction contracts for the last several years: - ____ __ _ 2007 Pavement Prep & Slurry Seal Program ---._._. _ _-_......_ _........ __..... --- City of Santa Barbara -----------------------... .......... 6.0 Mill_.ion S.F. 2007 Pavement Prep & Slurry Seal Program ----_._-_....-_-.__._...__.._......._.._.._... I City of Goleta ; 3.0 Million S.F . 2008 Pavement Prep & Slurry Seal Program City of Santa Barbara ------------ -- - ' 4 Million S.F. j - ..._.._._. - -- _..------ - - - 2008 Pavement Prep & Slurry Seal Program - _...__... --...._._.. i City of Goleta - - - 1 4 Million S.F. ! 2008 Overlay _............ ------ - --- __......... ... ; City of Goleta - 800,000 S.F. 2009 Pavement Prep & Slurry Seal Program -- -- --------------------............. City of Santa Barbara . - --- -a ' 6 M S.F. 2009 Pave Prep ; City of Santa Barbara i 70,000 SF 2009 Rejuvenating Cape Seal .- I City of Santa Barbara 450,000 SF --- -- -- -- - - -- ----------- 2009 Rejuvenating Cape Seal City of Santa Barbara 1.8 Million S.F. 2011 Pavement Prep I City of Santa Barbara 1--360-'666§-.F-. 2011 Slurry Seal ; City of Santa Barbara 2.0 Million S.F. - - .... ------------- - --- ----- 2012 Pavement Prep & Slurry Seal Program .�..__........ ----------._------__. i City of Gilroy _- - - ------ .___ _._... - ...__.._.., 300,000 S.F. 2013 Pavement Prep & Slurry Seal ; City of Santa Barbara 400,000 S.F./ 4 M S.F. _._....._...-_..__._..... - .... __ ..._... _ ..._... 2013 Overlay - --...... _..-....--...._..._._._................... - - ----- ...... _ ...- - - ._ ....__... I Cityof Camarillo -........__....._....-..._-...... -..... _... 500,000 S.F. ,.......... ..._ Category 13.6: Land Plannin_a/Enaineerin_a Santa Barbara Railroad Historic Redevelopment Award Winning Project — California Preservation Foundation's: Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Historic Preservation Mr. Flavell served as principal in charge, project manager and engineer of record for site improvements. This project was a historic renovation of the railroad station for seismic upgrades, building restoration and upgrade of the site to current ADA standards. The project included station landings, walkways, lighting, parking lots, park, and landscaping all integrated to provide the user with a feel of the original train station. Strict Railroad guidelines had to be met on the loading platform and the large expanse of concrete needed to be designed with positive drainage for this critical passenger area. The site is located in the lower portion of town, is flat and subject to flooding. All the drainage in the area ultimately flows to Mission 16 P66 Creek which runs adjacent to the site and crosses the site. During flood stage it is not uncommon for water to overflow the banks and inundate the site. The banks in fact are higher than a significant portion of the site. To protect the site from higher creek flows that are not overtopping the drainage system goes to a manhole and the storm drain is fitted with a check valve to prevent water from backing into the site. The system has been tested and functioned well in significant storms. Being a transportation hub, the site has to accommodate pedestrians, vehicles and busses. As many as five busses can be staged at the station. Project Completed in 1995 Santa Paula Railroad Station, City of Santa Paula, CA Award Winning Project — Santa Paula Chamber of Commerce Civic Beautification of the Year Mr. Flavell served as principal in charge and project manager and engineer of record for site improvements. Santa Paula is a unique small community in that it has an airport and its own railroad line. The railroad station was built in the 1930s and is a historic landmark. The site was generally undeveloped, except for some warehouses and packing plants nearby. Its location near the heart of town made this site a candidate for restoration. This project required designing the station platform in accordance with railroad standards. The project included a gazebo and park. The architect selected brick for the accent pavement areas, which included sidewalks adjacent to the street. A key element of the design of this project was design of ADA compliance and addressing the grade difference across the site. We developed a unique mountable curb to provide access to the original loading ramp and accommodate the sidewalk requirements. Project Completed in 2008 17 P67 18 pros Bowman C O N S U L T I N G E:=?i LUCAS ANTHONY. P.E. Sr. Project Manager Mr. Anthony has over 18 years of engineering and project management experience for private clients, including design of utility infrastructure, roadway, parking and stormwater elements for large scale retail projects. He is adept at preparing construction plans and specifications, permitting, scheduling, cost estimating and construction administration. Academic Credentials • BS Civil Engineering — University of Maine, 1997 t> Professional Registration =i Professional Engineer State of Florida License #58543 r; Professional Affiliations International Council of Shopping Centers Principal Areas of Expertise Project Management • Concept Planning • Land Development • Water and Wastewater Distribution Design • Permitting and Construction Services • Lift Station Design • Stormwater Management • Roadway/Parking Lot Design • Cost Estimates Experience Group 3 — Highway Design — Roadway — Category 3.1: Minor Highway Design Group 7 — Traffic Operations Design - Category 7.1: Signing, Pavement Marking and Channelization • SE Pomeroy Street, Martin County, Florida: Mr. Anthony served as Project Manager for the design of approximately 5000 LF of new 2 lane roadway along with the addition of a traffic signal and associated intersection widening and modification at each end of the roadway. The project involved erosion control, roadway and signal design, turn lane design, utility relocation and stormwater management design and calculations. The project required driveway, drainage and utility connection permits from FDOT and Martin County. This project involved communication and coordination with property owners adjacent to the right-of-way during the design process. • SE Market Place, Martin County, Florida: Mr. Anthony served as Project Manager for the design of approximately 2000 LF of roadway widening and modification to install new driveways and improve existing drainage. The project involved erosion control, roadway and signal design, turn lane design, utility relocation and stormwater management design and calculations. The project required driveway, drainage and utility connection permits from FDOT and Martin County. • State Road 7 / US Route 441 Lauderdale Lakes, Broward County, Florida: Mr. Anthony served as project manager for the design and permitting of a right -turn lane and modification of an existing signalized intersection in connection with a new retail development. The project involved design and permitting of erosion control, horizontal and vertical roadway design, utility relocation, stormwater design and construction observation and 19 P69 certification of the project. The project involved right-of-way dedication and both FDOT and County permitting of proposed improvements. • State Road 60, Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida: Mr. Anthony served as project manager for the design and permitting for the addition of a right -turn lane and driveway relocation to serve 2 properties in connection with a retail redevelopment project. The project involved design and permitting of erosion control, horizontal and vertical roadway design, signing and marking, overhead and underground utility relocation, stormwater design and construction observation and certification of the project. The project involved right-of- way dedication and both FDOT and County permitting of proposed improvements. • SR 520 and Townsend Road, Cocoa, Brevard County, Florida: Mr. Anthony served as Project Manager for the design of approximately 2000 LF of new 2 lane roadway along with the addition of a traffic signal and associated intersection widening and modification at each end of the roadway. The project involved erosion control, roadway and signal design, tum lane design, utility relocation and stormwater management design and calculations. The project involved the relocation of Townsend Road but required the existing roadway remain open to traffic while construction of a new retail development was occurring on both sides of the road. The project required public outreach and negotiation with adjacent property owners to modify existing driveway connections. The project scope included design of a new traffic signal, modification of an existing signal and exit ramp at the intersection of 1-95 and SR 520. • State Road 7 / US Route 441 Coconut Creek, Broward County,Florida: Mr. Anthony served as project manager for the design and permitting of roadway improvements to support a new retail development. The scope of work involved 3 new right -turn lanes and driveway connections and extension of existing an existing left -turn lane. In order to provide access from the store to an existing bus route the scope also involved design of a pedestrian footbridge and culverting an existing canal. Design and permitting elements included signing and marking, erosion control, horizontal and vertical design of the tum lanes, utility relocation, stormwater design and construction observation and certification of the project. Due to City requirements the project also involved placing all overhead utilities along the project frontage underground. The project involved right-of-way dedication and both FDOT and County permitting of proposed improvements. Group 10 — CEI — Category 10.1: Roadway CEI Mr. Anthony served as Project Manager and Engineer of Record during construction of parking lots, driveway connections and drive aisles in a variety of commercial development projects. Mr. Anthony participated in pre - construction meetings, ensured that erosion control measures were installed, observed grading, preparation and string lining of sub -grade, base and pavement, reviewed density tests and certified projects to local municipalities. Mr. Anthony observed the construction of the following projects: ■ Walmart Pompano Beach, Florida ■ Walmart Stuart, Florida ■ Walmart Lauderdale Lakes,. Florida ■ Walmart Jupiter, Florida • Walmart Coconut Creek, Florida ■ Walmart Boynton Beach, Florida ■ Walmart Davie, Florida ■ Sam's Club Cape Coral, Florida ■ Sam's Club Vero Beach, Florida ■ Sam's Club Cocoa, Florida Group 13 — Planning — Category 13.6 — Land Planning / Engineering Mr. Anthony has served as Project Manager and Engineer of Record on a variety of land development projects. These projects typically involve the following land planning and engineering functions: 20 P70 i i • Due diligence research of existing conditions, permit requirements, concurrency, local land development regulations, drainage and environmental conditions • Assessment of client requirements and objectives • Pre -application meetings with various municipal and regulatory agencies • Coordination with various consultants (environmental, legal, geotechnical, traffic, architects, land planners) • Conceptual and final site plan, engineering design and cost estimates • Traffic circulation within the site j • Access management and offsite roadway improvements (traffic lights, road widening, turn lane, intersection improvements) • Permitting through local, state and federal regulatory agencies I • Attendance and client representation at public meetings • Construction observation and certification 21 R71 22 P72 r `,•• ..Itl�j�9�� EER -31A EDUCATION Chris Evers Evers Infrastructure Group LLC 554257 1h Way Vero Beach, FL 32967 727-638-1699 Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, Oklahoma State University —1996 Marketing Major, President's Honor Roll, Dean's Honor Roll CURRENT ROLE President, Owner Evers Infrastructure Group LLC, Vero Beach, FL 2012 - Present Represent multiple clients in the Heavy Highway Industry focused on improving the State's infrastructure. Responsibilities include leading and implementing all educational efforts for alternative processes in Florida. Deliver technical presentations to civil engineers and road administrators. Work with cities and counties to maximize their roadway budgets. Provide pavement management advice to key decision -makers within the public and private sector. Help introduce new technologies and processes across the State of Florida. Provide consultation services for in-place recycling technologies. Lead multi -association effort to increase infrastructure funding at the County Commission and Florida Legislature levels. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Principal, Full Depth Reclamation (FDR), Cold In -Place Recycling (CIR) - Construction Engineering Inspection • Town of Lady Lake, Avenida Central CIR, 2014 • Nassau County, Blackrock Road FDR Phase 3, 2014 • Zephyrhills Airport, Runway Rehabilitation FDR, 2014 • Nassau County, Blackrock Road CIR Phase 2, 2014 • Hendry County, CR 835 Phase 2, 2014 • Nassau County, Blackrock Road CIR Phase 1, 2013 • Hendry County, CR 835 CIR Phase 1, 2012 ACHIEVEMENTS • APWA Consultant of the Year — Transportation, 2015 • APWA Ben Pratt Award, 2014 • APWA Florida Chapter Past President Award, 2013 • Contractor of the Year, Florida Chapter APWA, 2010 • Contractor of the Year, West Coast Branch APWA, 2010 • Florida Association of Counties Excellence in Speaking Award, 2007, 2009 • APWA Florida Chapter Young Leader Award, 2008 23 P73 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • Florida Chapter APWA PWX Exhibitor Co -Chair 2016 • Florida Chapter APWA Finance Chair 2015 - present • Florida Chapter APWA President 2012 • Founded the Public Works Director Roundtable Initiative 2011 • Founding Board Member of Florida Pavement Preservation Council, 2010 • Florida Chapter APWA Legislative Affairs Committee Founder and Chair, 2008 - 2011 • Florida Association of County Engineers and Road Superintendents Sustaining Member, 2009 — Present • Asphalt Reclaiming and Recycling Association CIR Committee, 2008 - 2012 • ASCE Infrastructure Committee Member, 2007 — 2012 • West Coast Branch APWA Nominating Committee, 2005 - 2008 • University of Florida Technology Transfer LTAP Faculty, 2004 — 2007 • Florida Airports Council Member 2004 — Present PUBLICATIONS • Author How to Properly Budget Road Work, Florida Journal August 2016 • Author, Public Works Director Roundtable Article APWA Florida Reporter April 2016 • Author, Let's Fix Funding APWA Florida Reporter April 2016 • Author, Public Works Director Roundtable Article APWA Reporter August 2014 • Contributing Author, Preventative Maintenance, a four-part series, Florida Technology Transfer Newsletter, 2007-2008 SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS • Moderator Florida Association of Counties Infrastructure Funding Panel, 2016 • Moderator ASCE/ASHE/APWA/FES/WTS Let's Fix Funding! Panel, 2015 • Moderator International Public Works Roundtable at APWA Congress, 2014 - Present • APWA Gold Coast Branch, 2015 • NACE/APWA Public Works Expo, 2015 • Florida Association of County Engineers and Road Superintendents Conference, 2015 • APWA Treasure Coast Branch, 2015 • Florida Airports Council Facility Conference, 2014 • Moderator Central Florida Branch APWA Public Works Director Panel, 2014 • Florida Association of County Engineers and Road Superintendents Legislative Conference, 2014 • Moderator of North Florida Branch APWA Public Works Director Panel, 2013 • Moderator of Southwest Florida Branch APWA Public Works Director Panel, 2013 • Florida Association of County Engineers and Road Superintendents Annual Conference, 2013 • Moderator of Florida Chapter Public Works Director Roundtables, 2012 - Present • Florida Association of County Engineers and Road Superintendents Legislative Conference, 2011 24 P74 Gil A. Ramirez, P.E. Project Manager Lassitd9lans ortation Group, Inc. P P� Engineering and Planning EDUCATION Florida Institute of Technology, B.S.C.E., Civil Engineering (2000) REGISTRATIONS Registered Professional Engineer, Florida P.E. No. 62600 FDOT Intermediate MOT Certification IMSA Traffic Signals Level II Technician AFFILIATIONS International Municipal Signal Association ITS America Mr. Ramirez has over 16 years .of design, project management, and traffic operations experience on a variety of projects. Through various projects and his government background Mr. Ramirez has acquired a thorough knowledge of FDOT policies, procedures, and specifications and has become proficient in the use of various software packages, including: Highway Capacity Software, Synchro, TSPP, AutoCAD, Atlas, Mastarm, ArtPLAN, and many others. Professional Design Experience Engineer of Record, Lake Andrew Drive at Napolo Drive and Colonnade Avenue, Brevard County, FL: Mr. Ramirez designed, permitted, and provided bidding assistance at two new signals at the intersections of Lake Andrew Drive and Napolo Drive, and Lake Andrew Drive and Colonnade Avenue in Brevard County, FL. The project consisted of new mast -arm structures, pedestrian features, video detection, and fiber optic interconnect to create a new coordinated signal segment. Engineer of Record, Maintenance Drive at Wickham Road, Brevard County, FL: Mr. Ramirez designed, permitted, and provided bidding assistance at a new signal at the intersection of Maintenance Drive and Wickham Road in Brevard County, FL. The project consisted of new mast -arm structures, video detection, interconnection of the signal into the County's fiber optic network, installation of wireless magnetometers for system detection, and incorporation of the signal into adaptive signal control. Engineer of Record, Signalization Improvements, Kennedy Space Center, FL: Mr. Ramirez designed and provided bid assistance with a series of modifications to the signalization within the Kennedy Space Center. The project retrofitted back -plates at all signalized intersections and replaced existing heads with 4 -section flashing yellow arrow heads. Engineer of Record, Gateway Boulevard at Hibiscus Boulevard, Melbourne, FL: Mr. Ramirez designed, permitted, and provided bid assistance for a modification to the signalization at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard at Hibiscus Boulevard in Melbourne, FL. The project consisted of a mast -arm replacement of an existing span -wire intersection. Engineer of Record, Hibiscus Boulevard at Hickory Street, Melbourne, FL: Mr. Ramirez designed, permitted, and provided bid assistance for a modification to the signalization at the intersection of Hickory Street at Hibiscus Boulevard in Melbourne, FL. The project consisted of a mast -arm replacement of an 25 P75 existing span -wire intersection, rerouting of fiber optic cabling, and complete replacement of the detection with new loops. Engineer of Record, Hibiscus Boulevard at Stewart Drive, Melbourne, FL: Mr. Ramirez designed, permitted, and bid a modification to the signalization at the intersection of Hickory Street at Hibiscus Boulevard in Melbourne, FL. The project consisted of a mast -arm replacement of an existing span -wire intersection and complete replacement of the detection with new loops. Professional Intelligent Transportation Systems 11TS) and Lighting Experience ITS & Lighting Design Engineer, 1-95 at J.T. Butler Interchange Improvement, Jacksonville, FL: Mr. Ramirez was the EOR for the IMR update, ITS and lighting component plans for an interchange improvement project in Jacksonville, FL. The design -build project was let by FDOT District 2, and consisted of an IMR update reflecting modified ramp geometry as part of an ATC; relocation or replacement of all ITS devices, power, and fiber optic cabling; and the replacement or installation of new lighting within the interchange, including maintenance girder lighting within the new overpass ramp box girders. ITS & Lighting Engineer, Widening of Homestead Ext. to the Florida Turnpike, Miami -Dade County, FL: Mr. Ramirez was the EOR for the ITS and lighting component plans for a widening of the Florida Turnpike to accommodate express lanes along 5 miles in Miami -Dade County, FL. The design -build project was let by the Florida Turnpike Enterprise, and consisted of replacement of all ITS devices, power, and fiber optic cabling; and the replacement of impacted conventional lighting along the segment. ITS Design Engineer, Barnes Boulevard Widening, Rockledge, FL: Mr. Ramirez designed the ITS components necessary to add five traffic signals to the Brevard County ITS network as part of the Barnes Boulevard Widening project in Rockledge, FL. The project consisted of the modification of FDOT network infrastructure along SR 520, replacement of FDOT fiber optic infrastructure along Barnes Boulevard, and addition of five new intersections into the ITS. Traffic Operations Manager, Brevard County Advanced Traffic Management System Expansion (ATMS) and Wickham Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Phase II, Brevard County, FL: Provided support and technical assistance with the deployment, integration, validation, and final testing of an ITS expansion project which deployed CCN, travel -time, vehicle detection, and adaptive traffic signal control technologies to 112 intersections on 11 corridors in Brevard County, and interconnected them through fiber- optic cabling and Ethernet compliant network devices to two Brevard County management centers, and the City of Melbourne management center. The project included: • Underground and overhead 72 SM fiber-optic trunk cabling and 12 SM drop cabling • Juniper and ITS Express layer 2 and layer 3 networking devices • Bosch Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Cameras • Sensys Networks wireless Vehicle Detection Systems • Sensys Networks Archive, Proxy, and Statistics (SNAPS) server • BlueTOAD Travel Time System • Naztec, Inc. Advanced Traffic Control (ATC) traffic signal controllers • Trafficware, Inc. SynchroGreen traffic adaptive server software 26 P76 EDUCATION University of Central Florida, B.S.C.E., Civil Engineering (1990) Summa Cum Laude Registered Professional Engineer, Florida P.E. No. 44077 AFFILIATIONS American Society of Civil Engineers Florida Engineer Society Mr. Mark P. Neiman, P.E., has 40 years of professional experience. He began his career as a drafter for District Five of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Mr. Neiman has extensive experience in the planning, design and project management of transportation and drainage -related projects in Florida. This includes highways and roadways, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, urban storm sewer, rural drainage systems, retention ponds, large- and small -basin studies, horizontal and vertical geometrics, water, sewer, traffic and traffic signal design, preparation of construction plans and related bid documents, cost estimates, utility planning and coordination and construction supervision and inspection. He has directed public involvement and public meetings, determined and assisted with right of way acquisition, prepared specifications, related bid documents and cost estimates. .RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Project Manager and Engineer of Record, Group 99-8 Roadway Widening and Resurfacing Projects FDOT, District 3 Chipley, FL: Served as Project Manager and Engineer or Record (4 Projects in contract) for final construction plans, for widening, milling & resurfacing, pavement design, intersection and safety improvements, including turn lanes, drainage improvements and permitting on four separate 2 -lane rural roadways in District 3. Project Manager, Engineer of Record, arid Utility Coordinator SR 816 (Oakland Park Blvd.), Turnpike Overpass to SR 7, FDOT District 4 Broward County FL: Mr. Neiman directed the design of a of one - mile widening and resurfacing project. The project was located within a medical facilities district including a laser eye surgery center and a hospital. Extensive coordination was necessary to develop special conditions that were required to limit vibrations and noise. Special pavement design analysis was also required to eliminate vibratory compaction. Special consideration was necessary during development of the Maintenance of Traffic plan to ensure that emergency services access to the hospital would not be impeded. Transit facilities along the route required coordination with several agencies to accommodate relocation of bus shelters and improvements necessary to comply with current ADA requirements. Curb returns and cross walks also required upgrading to meet current ADA requirements. Seven traffic signal locations were upgraded to Mast Arm installations. Coordination with local permitting agencies resulted in the need to design innovative shallow onsite stormwater treatment areas in order to meet local County stormwater regulations. Existing storm sewers were evaluated for de -silting and capacity and the roadway widening areas were evaluated for spread. Several special structures were necessary to accommodate the widening of the roadway. Special profiles were developed to provide proper gutter grades and meet spread requirements. Existing conditions at the Turnpike overpass required special guardrail design in order to upgrade and replace existing guardrail installations on the bridge ends and approaches. Project Manager Engineer of Record and Utility Coordinator, SR AIA, Old Dixie Highway to East of the North Causeway Bridge, FDOT District 4, Ft Pierce, FL: Mr. Neiman directed the design of this one- half -mile widening and resurfacing project. The project included design and preparation of construction plans for improvements on both sides of the North Causeway Bridge in Ft. Pierce, FI. The improvements included adding left turns on the west approach to Old Dixie Highway and a right turn lane and raised median on the west approach then tapering down to two lanes at the bridge. Sidewalk and curb ramp improvements to meet ADA requirements were also included. Drainage design included a closed storm sewer system with numerous inlets due to flat grades prior to the bridge and the steep grades coming off 27 P77 the bridge. A shallow retention area was provided adjacent to the bridge and required extensive coordination with the Permitting agencies due to its proximity to the Intercoastal Waterway. Special attention toward protection of seagrass was required and limitations to construction within the tidal zone were imposed by the agencies. Extensive utility coordination by Mr. Neiman was required because all major utilities to Hutchinson Island developments to the east crossed the waterway via this causeway. Utility coordination was a part of the contract scope. Special drainage structures were designed to accommodate conflicts between these utilities and the large pipes required for the storm sewer. Due to limited RNV and bridge embankments, retaining walls were necessary in some areas adjacent to the bridge. Bridge embankment guardrail systems were upgraded as part of the project. A railroad crossing adjacent to Old Dixie Highway required extensive coordination with the Railroad company for both the design team and the utility companies doing relocations. The railroad crossings proximity to the intersection also required special analysis and design. Traffic signal preemption was included for the crossing. Roadway work on the east side of the bridge included milling and resurfacing, striping to accommodate the new lane configurations, signing and guardrail replacements. Project Manager and Engineer of Record, US 27 Roadway Design, Polk County, FL: Mr. Neiman directed the design of four- to six- lane widening and resurfacing on 4.5 miles of major arterial roadway in the rapidly growing Disney World area near Kissimmee. The project included design of the roadway widening, resurfacing, and cross slope analysis, pavement design and drainage improvements, safety improvements, traffic control plans, pavement marking and signing, traffic analysis and design of three new traffic signals. The project also required traffic volume studies and projections for design year traffic volumes and pavement designs as well as stormwater system design, roadway cross slopes analysis and environmental considerations. Project Manager and Engineer of Record, Old Kings Road Roadway Widening, Milling and Resurfacing and Sidewalk Improvements, Flagler County, FL: Mr. Neiman directed the design, specifications, and construction plans for widening, milling and resurfacing of a three lane rural section of Old Kings Road to provide dedicated turn lanes for busses and parent vehicles into the Old Kings Elementary School located adjacent to the roadway. The project included the addition of 8' and 10' wide sidewalks, meeting ADA requirements, along both sides of Old Kings Road for 2,800 feet from its intersection with SR 100 as part of a Flagler County Safe Routes to School improvement project. This included reviews and approvals at phase submittals by FDOT and Flagler County. Drainage improvements and modifications to accommodate the widening and construction of the wide sidewalks were included, as well as permitting coordination and exemptions with the St. John's River Water Management District. Roadway and sidewalk plans and details, grading plans, cross sections, drainage structure details, erosion control and signing and pavement marking plans were included in this contract. Additionally, a 10' sidewalk was added on the east side of the road to provide schoolchildren with safe access to and from the school to SR 100. Eight -foot -wide sidewalks were constructed on the west side to complete the sidewalk system on that side of the roadway within the limits of the project. Project Manager, Design Oversight, and QA1QC Engineer, SR 552 Curry Ford Road, Orange County, FDOT District 5, Orange County, FL: Mr. Neiman was responsible for the project, maintaining the project budgets and schedules, and provided design supervision and oversight as well as detailed QAJ QC reviews. This 1.24 -mile project on this high-volume segment of SR 552 located north of the Orlando International Airport included resurfacing, cross slope correction, access management and turn lane modifications and restriping to accommodate new bike lanes. Safety improvements along the corridor include upgrading the curb ramps to meet ADA requirements, realigning high -emphasis crosswalks, and median modifications to address crash reductions and detailed Temporary Traffic Control plans. The project included signing and pavement markings design to retrofit the existing roadway with new bike lanes and narrowed through lanes as well as new median markings and signs for the revised median openings and closures. New high emphasis cross walks were added to improve safety at the school crossing on the project and cross walks were relocated to improve pedestrian safety. Signalization plans were included to upgrade existing signals with new pedestrian detectors systems and replace loops with video detection systems tied into the County wide ATMS system. Mr. Neiman oversaw a team of Subconsultants including Survey, Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE), Traffic Signal design and Utility Coordination. 28 P78 Project Manager and Engineer of Record, Design Services, US 41 Venice Bypass, Florida Department of Transportation, District 1, Sarasota County, FL: Mr. Neiman prepared the construction plans for the widening of the US 41 Venice Bypass. His design included realignment and reconstruction of the existing four -lane with six -lane urban typical sections. Design of a closed stormsewer system, and five stormwater treatment facilities, community involvement, traffic volume studies and projections, roundabout feasibility studies, coordination with utility owners and wetland impacts and mitigation were an integral part of the project. Maintenance of traffic plans, signing and marking plans and traffic signal plans for five signalized intersections with left turn phasing were also included in the scope of work. W P79 30 P80 RANDAL W. STORMANT, JR. Materials Testing Manager t rstormant(a)bechtol.com e SUMMARY OF CAPABILITIES BECHTOL ENGINEERING AND TESTING, INC. 605 West New York Ave., Suite A Deland, FL32720 386-734-8444 _ Most Aspects of Construction Materials Testing Geotechnical Investigation _ Project Development and Management ENGINEERING SEMINARS FDOT Piling Placement Inspection Troxler Radiation Safety Officer Training CERTIFICATIONS CTQP/FDOT Asphalt Plant Technician Level 1 and Level 2 CTQP/FDOT Asphalt Paving Technician Level 1 and Level 2 CTQP/FDOT Quality Control Manager CTQP/FDOT Earthwork/Density Inspector Level 1 .and Level 2 CTAP/FDOT Concrete Lab Technician Level 1 NICET Level III Soils NICET Level 11 Asphalt NICET Level II Concrete Troxler Radiation Safety Officer, Nuclear Gauge Operator PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Stormant has been Materials Testing Manager for Bechtol Engineering and Testing, Inc. since June, 1992. He is responsible for Project Management and coordination of all Materials Testing Projects. He began his materials testing career in September, 1987. Mr. Stormant has managed thousands of Materials Testing Projects throughout the State of Florida. Some of the municipalities and private companies he has associated with are: Florida Department of Transportation, Counties of Volusia, Flagler and Seminole, Cities of Ormond Beach, Deland and Sanford, and P & S Paving, Rinker Materials, Asphalt Recyclers, Steelmaster Industries, Ranger Construction, Halifax Paving , Asphalt Paving Systems and many more. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION EXPERIENCE Mr. Stormant has supervised the development of laboratory mix designs and performance of in - held production testing for hundreds of pavement rehabilitation projects throughout Florida. 31 P81 32 P82 Project Approach & Management APPROACH Introduction: The county's primary objective in hiring a firm experienced in road modification design is to obtain knowledge gained from the consultant's experience on similar projects, under various conditions and settings, in order to lower total project cost, reduce problems during design and construction, and anticipate problems during the course of the project to avoid them. The reason for evaluating several companies is to select the firm that most closely shares the county's philosophy and desired approach to the work. This gives the county confidence that the project will be accomplished to meet the county's goal. This section will describe in detail how we will approach our work over the course of the entire project, why we will do it in a particular way, and what the benefits of our methods are. Philosophy: Based on our experience, these projects require attention to detail. It starts with the accumulation of base information. We want to accumulate information on all facilities that can impact the proposed improvements. Utility research will be performed early in the design phase of the project. If the project does not get off to a good start, it is hard to achieve an integrated and comprehensive design. At this stage of the project the preparation of quality topographic mapping and compilation of existing utility information are the key pieces. Thorough research, review of available record information and compilation of base information is a part of our QA/QC procedures, which highlights another part of our philosophy—the integration of QA/QC procedures into our design process. It begins with assembling a qualified team, proper planning and development of the project, clear communication, documentation of decisions made, and checks that include independent in-house and field review. The SOQ is the first step where we assemble the team, and perform a field review of the project, and generally define the work that will be performed. Design Issues: Full Depth Reclamation (FDR): Full Depth Reclamation is a cost effective and environmentally friendly rehabilitation strategy when constructed correctly. As with any alternative rehabilitation processes, it is not without its pitfalls and challenges. That is why having an experienced consulting engineering team is so important. To that end we've compiled a few specific key areas of focus that we can help with to implement a successful project. Specifications are always critical in road construction. With constant technology improvements, agencies often make the mistake of using outdated specifications. This is one of the most important factors in determining a positive outcome on the road. We have the expertise and unmatched prior experience to assemble the proper and most up to date 33 P83 FDR specs. Evers IG and Bechtol have worked with numerous specifications and have been involved with the development of them. FDR mix designs are another area many agencies are unfamiliar with. Industry advancements have brought new approaches to the forefront. Hybrid designs utilize multiple additives rather than just one thereby increasing early strength and lowering overall additive costs. Bechtol Materials and Testing brings this expertise to our team and has extensive project experience with hybrid designs both in the laboratory during the design phase, and in the field with inspection and testing. Lastly quality control plays a large role in getting the kind of finished product the County envisions. Does the successful low bidder have the equipment required to perform the work as specified? Does the mix design provide the correct structural coefficient as required by the County? How do the soils vary over the project limits? Are the appropriate amount of working days allocated and has the contractor been made aware of the liquidated damages at the pre -construction meeting? Who will provide inspectors with adequate knowledge and training to anticipate construction problems and enforce the specifications? These are some of the questions we will respond to over the course of design to help guide the county to a successfully completed FDR project. 69th Street Left tum lane improvements: The Scope calls for the addition of left -turn lanes on all approaches at the 69th St. intersection with 58th Ave. We anticipate widening six feet on both sides of the roadway on all approaches to minimize taper lengths, alignment shifts and impacts to utilities and other roadside features. We will design the intersection to provide proper turning radii for the left turning movements and accommodate the new signal. Tapers will be designed in accordance with FDOT index 301, Turn Lanes and index 526, Roadway Transitions. There is a deep ditch along the south side of 69th St. that is approximately 20 feet from the edge of pavement allowing the additional 6 feet of pavement to be added. This will be carefully evaluated as the ditch maybe within the clear zone width of 18 feet, after the widening, and required shielding or pipe extensions to eliminate this unsafe condition. Also there is a large water main crossing the ditch at the intersection adjacent to the straight endwall that will require adjustment to allow the new return radius to be constructed. Alternatively, we will evaluate shifting the widening to the north on 69th to avoid this. However, we recommend removal of the endwall and replacement with a mitered end section for safety reasons. This would also require adjustment of the water main. We also recommend this for the U-endwall on the southeast side of the intersection as well since it would be impacted by the return radii also unless the roadway is shifted north. Since 69th street is straight for a long distance on each approach the roadway shift at the intersection could be troublesome to drivers. The installation of the new traffic signal may also impact the ditch depending on the location of the new poles. Unless there is significant benefit to shifting the roadway north to avoid these impacts we recommend the equal width widening on both sides. Along 58th Ave there is a shallower swale along the east side approximately 22 feet from the edge of travel and another shallow swale on the west side just off the 8 -foot shoulder. Adjustment to these will be required to maintain drainage at the intersection. However, there is adequate room available to widen equally on both sides along 58th Ave. 34 P84 Signalization: We propose to conduct an extensive research and coordination effort prior to the design of the signalization replacements at the intersections of 58th Avenue (Kings Highway/CR 613) with 69th Street and CR 510. We will complete a records search for the original traffic signal plans and inspect the existing signal equipment, observe the intersections, review the existing signal programming, and obtain the latest counts. We will use this information to evaluate potential operational issues, establish the optimal signal phasing, and design the supports and lane configurations at each intersection to accommodate any anticipated future demand. We have already begun this effort, reviewing a copy of the Indian River County capital improvement program and FDOT work program. Existing street lighting fixtures at each intersection will also be documented and recommendations provided for illumination of the intersections. We will review the County survey data to ensure that all geometric components that may affect the design have been identified, including: above and below ground utilities, landscaping, and roadway elements. We will also obtain subsurface utility explorations to identify any unmarked utilities in the vicinity of the proposed pole foundations. The explorations will be completed after determination of the pole locations through discussions with the County, and coordination with all known Utility companies within the Right of Way. Street lighting will be accommodated in the design of the supports for the intersection of 58th Avenue at 69th Street, which are currently attached to the strain poles. As the intersection of 5861 Avenue at CR 510 already employs lighting mounted to the FP&L shared -use poles, therefore additional luminaires are not anticipated for that intersection. A quality signal plan set does not stop with our final approved plan set. Post design items such as shop drawing reviews and approvals and responses to additional information requests by the contractor are frequently needed during the construction process. The team's familiarity and understanding of the FDOT and local agency procurement and construction process will also provide value for the County's construction team during the signal construction phase. Signing and Pavement Markings: We have a wealth of experience in providing widening, safety and rehabilitation design of rural roadways. All pavement markings and signing will be designed following the latest preferences of Indian River County, the MUTCD and the current FDOT indices. All existing signs and markings will be inventoried and evaluated for conformance with current standards. Roadway vertical and horizontal geometry will be reviewed to ensure that all turning movements have adequate sight distance to complete a turning maneuver safely. Such as at 621 Ln where tree limbs block the view. We recommend these be trimmed back to the right of way line to eliminate this. Adequate signage will be designed to provide advance information for all signalized intersections, provide warning for any side street connections that may have limited visibility and to inform of any upcoming roadway changes. Existing signs that meet the design horizontal clearance criteria will be kept as long as they have proper reflectivity and are in good condition. Other signs in good 35 P85 condition and proper reflectivity will be relocated to the required horizontal clearance. Signs in poor condition that are still necessary will be replaced. Existing signs that do not meet the minimum height clearance will be raised to seven feet above the edge of travel to ensure proper clearance above the paved shoulder bike lanes on both sides. All pavement markings will be replaced with thermoplastic paint once the resurfacing is completed. Where roadway modifications are necessary the new markings and signing will be designed for the new conditions. Pedestrian crosswalks will be safely designated according to the latest standards noted above. All crosswalks will have adequate signage to provide advanced information to the motorists for safety and pedestrian landing pads will be installed on all corners that do not have sidewalk connections when sidewalk is present on the opposing side. It was noted that sidewalk alignments at 75th St and 81St St. do not meet ADA requirements and need to be realigned at the intersection to guide users into the crosswalk instead of into the intersection. We will see that the sidewalk realignments are incorporated in the construction plans. These two intersections will need the pedestrian landing pads as will all four corners of the CR -510 intersection due to the existing signal with Ped features and crosswalks and no sidewalks. It was noted that GoLine Bus Route 9 serves this roadway segment. There are several bus stops located along the corridor such as the ones at 65111 St, 69th St and 77th St.. These bus stops are not ADA compliant, having no boarding and alighting pads present. We will, at the direction of the County, coordinate with GoLine to advise them of this deficiency and determine their schedule for improvements to avoid conflicts with the contractor during construction. Bus stop ADA improvements are typically the responsibility of the bussing authority. Design Approach: Preliminary Engineering: We propose the project be done in two phases, Preliminary Engineering and Final Design. We recommend this approach for several reasons. First, preliminary engineering gives us the opportunity to compile all the base information, set control grades, evaluate the extent of conforms (driveway and adjacent streets) required, confirm drainage patterns and ditch clearances, identify the key issues and impacts, develop an opinion of construction cost for the various elements, and perform a complete assessment the project. This can all be done for a fraction of the total cost of detailed final design, and if portions of the project are identified as too expensive, alternatives can be looked at prior to investing in the cost of detailed design. The preliminary design phase of this project will provide for proper project development and is consistent with our QA/QC procedures. At this first stage of the project we will compile the base information and background information and set up the project. We will evaluate the budget to assess what is the realistic cost of improvements. We will work with the county to sort through the proposed improvements and recommend refinements to the project based our experience. The first design -level step is to perform the development of the engineering control plan. This is where we work with the topographic mapping and start designing the road geometrics. Mapping is critical and we will rely on the mapping provided by the county. 36 P86 We can then lay out proposed improvements to see what fits and where the conform issues are. The project will be designed to about the 20-25% complete milestone. Street modification projects require the designer to spend time in the field, and we anticipate several field visits during the preliminary engineering portion of the project. The first will be at the beginning of the project to review and photograph the entire project. The second time will take place as the preliminary engineering process is being completed to compare the preliminary layout to the existing conditions. Conflicts will be noted and the plan modified to accommodate existing conditions. Site visits to correlate our design to existing conditions is part of our QA/QC procedures. Once the preliminary engineering work is complete and the project elements and issues are identified, permitting and utility coordination can move forward. The FDR process will require that all utility and other interferences be lowered to a depth safely below where the mixing will take place. This work can advance on a parallel track with the design. Since both the design and project constraints will have been identified, the design can proceed with a minimum of interruptions. This approach significantly improves design efficiency, reduces back tracking, and reduces overall project cost. Proper project development is part of our QA/QC procedures. Final Design: As we move into detailed design, our design philosophy comes into play. Our design philosophy is that capital cost (the cost to construct the project) typically comes along once, whereas maintenance costs are forever. We design improvements to be durable and low maintenance. This means that the design and construction may cost a little more but the total life cycle cost (the cost the county pays over the life of the project including maintenance) is lower. The second part of our philosophy is that good design is in the details. A detailed design typically costs a little more to prepare than a basic design, but results in savings during construction through fewer change orders to adjust a design to conform to existing conditions. Design with consideration for how it is constructed and what is required to maintain the improvements will more than offset the higher cost of a thorough design. Preparing the drawings starts with selecting a scale and sheet layout. This is also part of our QA/QC. If the scale that is selected is too small, there will not be adequate detail in the design. If it is too large it will increase the sheet count and increase the cost of the project. For this project we recommend working at 1" = 20' scale because of the level of detail needed to identify and properly design conforms to existing improvements. The specifications will need to address work sequencing and phasing as well as controlling the FDR work. During the course of the project we will have regular progress meetings with the County. This allows us to bring attention to the issues we have identified and confirm how they should be addressed. It also allows mid -way corrections in the design process so we don't come to the end of the project and be faced with significant changes. Clear communication and documentation of the design process is part of our QA/QC procedures. 37 P87 Once the drawings are complete (90% submittal) and delivered to the county for their final review, we perform our own independent review. Our review consists of an in-house review by those knowledgeable in construction and design, and independent of the design team. We also perform a field review, visually checking the drawings against the actual existing conditions in the field. This will be our third and final formal field review of the project. These final checks complete our QA/QC procedures for the design process. This information will be coupled with the county's review comments to complete the contract documents to bid -ready status. The Tangible Intangibles: Esthetics in street design comes from design simplicity and smooth curb or pavement edge lines. Well designed street improvements go unnoticed because they form a part of the viewscape. One of the problems with road modification projects is the lack of time spent properly designing transitions to existing improvements. This results in broken back curves, the unsightly angle points and the awkward transitions that bump or stick out like a sore thumb. If the base improvements, such as the curb line, the back of sidewalk line and the pavementedge horizontal and vertical alignment are not smooth lines they will forever detract from the .visual continuity between the street, landscaping and other amenities. Design simplicity is realized through attention to detail, multiple iterations to achieve a better solution and confirmation of fit to existing conditions. Using our approach, and staffing the project with seasoned design professionals who also have substantial construction experience will allow the design process to flow smoothly. This flow will continually converge to the finished deliverables. We find that this approach reduces total project cost, helps eliminate unnecessary back tracking and prevents .substantial redesign at the end of the project to correct design deficiencies due to inexperienced design staff. This proposal was not prepared by a marketing department. The approach outlined above including the philosophy and QA/QC procedures were developed by the people who will be actively involved with the design of this project. This is the blueprint of our design process and this approach has been developed through the course of 30 -plus years of street retrofit design projects, and is further refined with each project we do. MANAGEMENT QA/QC Procedures: Our QA/QC procedures include: team qualifications and skill sets, a realistic project schedule, adequate budget, thorough research, proper work sequencing, continuous checks during design, proper records, fostering a collaborative environment, regular communications, and documenting decisions and why they were made. Bowman views QA/QC as a foundational aspect of the design process. We have identified that work sequencing is a significant factor in both quality and cost control. This approach looks at what information is need, and when it is needed in the design process. Proper work sequencing facilitates good decisions so the design process can converge on the 38 P88 .i improvement the client wants. This approach can reduce design changes that arise from issues that could have been known earlier in the process, if the work was properly sequenced. Reducing design changes has a direct correlation in reducing errors and cost. Meetings are a key element of the design process and are a primary component of our QA/QC procedures. For the design of a typical project, we would recommend meetings at the beginning of the project, 30%, 60% and 90% milestones. The issues we identify at each phase of the design are discussed and then resolved through the design process. The meetings are a convenient way to document decision making and meeting notes provide a living checklist of issues that need to be addressed to complete the design, and is another tool to prevent loose ends from being missed. We will perform independent in-house review of the drawings and specifications. In addition to the office plan check, we perform a field review of the drawings to confirm that the drawings are consistent with field conditions. Integration of our QA/QC procedures into the services process is a holistic approach. It is continually refined, adjusted for change with a focus on accuracy and completeness. Our QA/QC program is a result of our team's commitment to quality and thoroughness throughout a project's development and implementation. Work Allocation: We anticipate the work will generally breakdown as 10-15% managerial, 70-85% engineering and technical, and 5-10% administrative staff allocation with approximately 10-15% of the total effort devoted to quality control. . The team members listed on our Organization Chart are the personnel that will be assigned to the project. Mr. Flavell will be available up to 30% of his time for this project. Mr. Lucas will be available up to 25% of his time. This level of availability exceeds what is estimated to be required to perform the work. Meeting Time and Budget Requirements: The first level of meeting time commitments is to handle the work efficiently. This is best done by seasoned professionals who know what is required, know how to work efficiently, and know how to best triage a situation for successful conclusion. Mr. Flavell will be responsible for meeting schedules and budgets. He will be supported by Mr. Anthony, and both of us have been successfully meeting time and budget commitments for many years. We know what it takes and we will work the hours required to deliver the service. The benefit of selecting Bowman is if we need additional help beyond that supplied by our Melbourne office, we have the other offices to assist us. We regularly share resources and have excellent relationships between offices to address this very issue. Indian River County would be a key client and our goal is to establish a long term relationship. We continually strive to have a proper balance of private and public work. At this time our work load is weighted toward private work. A lot of private work is one out projects. Stability is developed through long term clients relationships. In order to meet our company goals, we have 39 P89 make the commitment to putting the resources where the long term relationships are, and that would be with our public sector clients. Working within Project Budget Constraints: Funding is almost always an issue on public improvement projects. We have developed several approaches to dealing with this challenge. As outlined in our approach we like to perform a detailed cost evaluation of a project somewhere around the 20-30% complete milestone to see where we are on the budget. The goal is to get a realistic appraisal of the project as early as possible, but far enough along in the design process so the major issues can be quantified. This approach limits the expense to get the project properly bracketed. At this point, with minimal investment, adjustments can be made to the scope of the project, the project can be phased, additional money can be sot, or the project could be put on hold. We have worked with agencies that know there is. insufficient money to construct the project, but want to proceed with design and a phased approach. One example is a mile of sidewalk that had not been constructed due to the terrain and cost, but public pressure was calling for the sidewalk to be completed. We worked with the agency and designed the entire project and prepared the cost estimate by plan sheet. The bid schedule was set up by plan sheet as well. This approach allowed us to wait to the last moment to determine actual funding and adjust the project to the available budget for the first phase. The rest of the project could be constructed in phases, based on how the money became available, and the plan set and bid schedule could be assembled to the available budget by adding or deleting sheets. A similar approach was used for water distribution system upgrades. The system was master planned and designed to make it easy to implement in phases. Having substantial construction experience is essential to developing these types of approaches to balance flexibility and cost of improvements. Constructability Reviews: Mr. Flavell has experience performing independent constructability reviews for agencies for many engineering projects, including roads, water treatment plants and wastewater treatment plants. Design's that are well thought out will make it easier for the contractor to build, cost less, have fewer problems, and take less time to construct. All designs should be reviewed from the perspective of how will they be constructed. Mr. Flavell has specific experience being in responsible charge for providing full construction observation and testing services for the following types of projects: ■ Roads — new construction, modifications to existing and pavement maintenance treatments • Waterlines, booster pump stations and steel reservoirs ■ Sewerlines, forcemains, and lift stations • Water Treatment Plants ■ Wastewater Treatment Plants ■ Drainage facilities including large junction structures This experience provides the foundation for how he approaches the design of his projects. 40 P90 Consultant Capabilities Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) FDR is very site sensitive and can even vary over the course of a single project. The key to a successful FDR project is the amount of experience the designer has, and more experience working with this technology is very advantages to the project. There is no substitute for actual field experience. Bechtol Materials and Testing, and more specifically Mr. Stormant, brings the experience of working with many agencies, on numerous projects, at a variety of locations, with primary responsibility for mix design and lay -down testing and inspection, a partial list of projects is presented below: Volusia County Palm Beach County Flagler County Polk County St. Johns County City of Tampa Duval County City of Palm Bay Lake County City of Dunedin Jackson County City of Gulfport Pasco County City of Kissimmee Martin County City of Orlando Bay County City of Northport Charlotte County City of Tamarac Glades County City of Bellaire Osceola County United States Navy Manatee County NASA Hendry County ...and many more. Street Modifications and Signals Lassiter Transportation Group, Inc. (LTG) is a small business enterprise, fully licensed engineering firm formed in 2002. LTG is proud to be pre -qualified with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in all traffic engineering and transportation planning work groups including studies, design, statistics, and planning. FDOT Qualifications 3.1 Minor Highway Design 7.1 Signing, Pavement Marking, and Channelization 6.1 Traffic Engineering Studies 7.2 Lighting 6.2 Traffic Signal Timing -7.3 Si nalization 6.3.1 ITS Analysis and Design 13.3 Policy Planning 6.3.2 ITS Systems Implementation 13.4 Systems Planning 6.3.3 1 ITS Traffic Engineering and 13.5 Systems Communications Subarea/Corridor Planning 6.3.4 ITS Software Development 13.6 Land Planning/Engineering 13.7 Transportation Statistics ITS — Intelligent Transportation Svstems 41 P91 LTG is backed by more than 35 years of experience providing traffic engineering and transportation planning services to public and private sector clients. LTG brings the needed expertise and commitment to excellence to manage even the most complex transportation systems on behalf of our clients. LTG emphasizes this commitment through: • Personal Customer Service • A Quality Product • Cost -Saving Solutions • Extensive Local and Statewide Experience • A Respected Industry -Wide Reputation LTG has proudly performed exceptionally well on continuing services contracts similar in nature to this one. Currently, LTG has over 37 continuing service contracts with various city, county, state, federal, and specialty agencies. Many of these are repeat contracts earned by consistently meeting schedules and budgets with quality work. Below is a sample listing of our current continuing services contracts in both sub -consultant and prime consultant capacities. ✓ Volusia County ✓ Brevard County ✓ St. Johns County ✓ Alachua County ✓ FDOT District 2 — Road Safety Audits ✓ FDOT District 5 — Modeling Support ✓ FDOT District 5 — Active Arterial Management Analysis ✓ Florida Turnpike Enterprise ✓ River to Sea Transportation Planning Organization ✓ Daytona Beach ✓ DeBary ✓ DeLand ✓ Crystal River ✓ Edgewater ✓ Haines City ✓ Howey -in -the -Hills ✓ Melbourne ✓ West Melbourne ✓ New Smyrna Beach ✓ Palm Coast ✓ Palm Bay 42 P92 Project Management and Bid Document Preparation These team member capabilities, coupled with Mr. Flavell's 30 years road improvement and pavement maintenance design and construction experience, is one of the capabilities that sets our team apart. Another is Mr. Flavell's significant project management experience as a prime consultant project manager, managing as many as 11 subconsultants and with experience over a variety of design and construction projects that include roads, utilities, drainage, water treatment plants and wastewater treatment plants. Specific road modification and pavement recycling projects have taught us the importance of early utility coordination, because existing facilities will require lowering in order to perform the recycling and then adjusting to finish grade. We also need to find out about scheduled utility maintenance project so newly reconstructed roads are not cut up shortly after reconstruction. Construction projects have taught us the importants of detailed drawings and attention to the design of conform locations. It is these types of issues that our experience will anticipate and address through the course of this design. 43 P93 44 P94 Project Schedule Scheduling is a very important aspect of delivery of services. We take our deadlines very seriously and deadlines are particularly important, because time is money. We will work with you at the beginning of the project to develop the scope, identify what the issues are, determine what the milestones are and with this information we will develop a project schedule. We typically include the project schedule with the preparation of the proposal, as this is part of the preparatory work we do for each project. An updated schedule is typically presented at each meeting to show what has been accomplished and what work remains. Using this approach we have a running dialogue about the project, and if something occurs that can impact the project it can be discussed as soon as it is identified. Depending on the issue, mitigating action may be taken or the schedule could be adjusted. Whatever the action is, it will be discussed with you and agreed upon to be the best approach for the situation. Projects are dynamic efforts on everyone's part. Schedules are put together based on the available information when they are created and past experience with similar projects. Schedule development is a key component of project development. If it is too short, the work will need to be accelerated and this leads to omissions and errors which can inhibit the development of good project solutions. A short schedule induces additional costs to accelerate it, as well. A long schedule can also be a problem. In this scenario work is done and then it is put down while something more important is attended to. Each time a project is put down and picked up, things are forgotten, momentum is lost, errors are made and cost goes up. As with most things there is an optimum time for performance that balances cost, momentum, allows for proper information development, information flow and overall project development. We will work with you to develop a realistic schedule at the beginning of the project and this promotes project success. That said, each project is unique and will experience its own issues and circumstance. We stress open communications so that everyone involved with the project is well informed about the issues and the developments as they occur. As professionals we all know that things happen, sometimes beyond our control, during the course of a project. Our job is to work with you in a timely manner to develop solutions that are consistent with your desires for the proper development of the project and the use of a schedule promotes this higher level of communications, involvement and follow through. We have prepared a preliminary schedule based on our current understanding of the project and as a starting place to develop an overall project schedule to guide us through the design and construction process. 45 P95 Proposed Project Schedule Description Time Total Time Preliminary Engineering Notice to Proceed Start Survey and To Mapping Completed Utility Research 4wks 4 wks Meetiggireview Des!2n Criteria) Layout proposed alignment 4 wks 4 wks Meeting (confirm alignment) Identify constraints and cost estimate 4 wks 8 wks Meeting (review constraints and costs, refine project, in -progress plans) Agency Review of In -Progress Plans 4 wks --12 —wks Final Design Start Final Design — 12 wks -Design toapproximately 60% complete 8 wks 20 wks Meet to review In progress desiqn Agency Review of In Progress Plans 4 wks 24 wks Designto approximately 90% complete 10 wks 34 wks Meet to review design, specs and costs Plan checking (County, in-house and .field 4 wks- 38 wks Address comments and complete deliver final bid documents 2 wks 40 wks Construction Advertise and Bid 4 wks 44 wks Award and NTP Tw—ks —50 wks Construct Improvements 24 wks —74 wks Punchlist Work and Accept Project 3 wks --wks As -Built Drawings 3 wks 80 wks 46 I- I References Bowman Continuing Engineering Services Bowman is pleased to have been selected for a number of on-going continuing engineering services contracts. We are currently providing services to the following agencies: Bowman Consulting References (Eric Flavell, P.E.) City of West Melbourne, FL Projects: Adjunct City Engineer Various as assigned Chad Shoultz - Deputy City Manager Phone: 321-837-7777 cshoultz@westmelbourne.org Christy Fischer - Planning Director Phone: 321-837-7778 cfischer@westmelbourne.org City of Stuart, FL Projects: Pavement Maintenance Program Bus Stop Project Australian Street Drainage Improvements Sam Amerson, Public Works Director Office: (772) 288-5331 samerson@ci.stuart.fl.us Tim Voelker, City Engineer Office: (772) 288-5332 TVoelker@ci.stuart.fl.us 47 City of West Melbourne City Engineer Saint Lucie County Engineering and survey City of Stuart Engineering and survey Martin County Survey Bowman Consulting References (Eric Flavell, P.E.) City of West Melbourne, FL Projects: Adjunct City Engineer Various as assigned Chad Shoultz - Deputy City Manager Phone: 321-837-7777 cshoultz@westmelbourne.org Christy Fischer - Planning Director Phone: 321-837-7778 cfischer@westmelbourne.org City of Stuart, FL Projects: Pavement Maintenance Program Bus Stop Project Australian Street Drainage Improvements Sam Amerson, Public Works Director Office: (772) 288-5331 samerson@ci.stuart.fl.us Tim Voelker, City Engineer Office: (772) 288-5332 TVoelker@ci.stuart.fl.us 47 City Camarillo, CA Projects: Pancho Roaq Reconstruction Project Annual Street Pavement Maintenance Projects Ken Matsuoka, Principal Engineer Office: (805) 383-5672 kmatsuoka@cityofcamarillo.org Evers Infrastructure Group (Chris Evers) Principal, Full Depth Reclamation (FDR), Cold In -Place Recycling (CIR), - Construction Engineering Inspection Town of Lady Lake, Avenida Central CIR, 2014 - CT Eagle Sr., Public Works Director (352) 751-1526, cteacilec@-Iadylake.org Nassau County, Blackrock Road FDR Phase 3, 2014 Buckley Williams PE, Principal, V.P. ETM Inc. (904) 642-8990, williamsb(cDetminc.com Zephyrhills Airport, Runway Rehabilitation FDR, 2014 Hilary Maull, Project Manager AVCON Inc. (407) 599-1122, hmaulIO-avconinc.com Nassau County, Blackrock Road CIR Phase 2, 2014 Buckley Williams PE, ETM Inc. Hendry County, CR 835 CIR Phase 2, 2014 Rock Aboujaoud6 PE, President Rock Enterprises (863) 612-0011, rock(&rockhendry-com Nassau County, Blackrock Road CIR Phase 1, 2013 Dow Peters, PE President Peters and Yaffee Inc. (904) 265-0751, dpetersAyetersandyaffee.corn Hendry County, CR 835 CIR Phase 1, 2012 Rock Aboujaoud6 PE, President Rock Enterprises Lassiter Transportation Group (Gil Ramirez) Brevard County Public Works John Denninghoff, PE Office: (32 1) 617-7202 City of Melbourne Engineering Jenni Lamb Office: (321.) 608-7300 ilambAmelbourneflorida.org 48 City of Daytona Beach Technical Services Bechtol Engineering & Testing (Randy Stormant) Volusia County - Wayne Jackson (386) 561-8655 wiackson0volusia.orq Jackson County - Larry Alvarez (850) 573-7491 lalvarez jacksoncount)M.com Polk County - Katia Delgado; (863) 688-1725 katia-delgadoCM-polk-county.net Pasco County - Efrain "Fig" Figueroa Florida FDOT - Greg Sholar (352) 955-2920; cell (352)3176633 gregory.sholaradot.state.fl.us Asphalt Recyclers - Ted Bitomski (321) 632-6552 Asphalt Paving Systems - Tommy Donald (813) 455-2469, (813) 788-0010, td.donald@hotmail.com Note: It is worth contacting contractors to determine who knows how to properly design and implement FDR projects. They have a lot at stake, are in the high risk position and they are where the binder hits the dirt. 49 P99 Frank Van Pelt :<. Office: (386) 671-8040 VanPeltF(&codb.us 1= = Volusia County Public Works Scott Martin, PE _ Office: (386) 736-2700 smartin _volusia.or4 City of Palm Coast Project Manager Carl Cote Office: (386) 986-3748 ccote paimcoast.gov Bechtol Engineering & Testing (Randy Stormant) Volusia County - Wayne Jackson (386) 561-8655 wiackson0volusia.orq Jackson County - Larry Alvarez (850) 573-7491 lalvarez jacksoncount)M.com Polk County - Katia Delgado; (863) 688-1725 katia-delgadoCM-polk-county.net Pasco County - Efrain "Fig" Figueroa Florida FDOT - Greg Sholar (352) 955-2920; cell (352)3176633 gregory.sholaradot.state.fl.us Asphalt Recyclers - Ted Bitomski (321) 632-6552 Asphalt Paving Systems - Tommy Donald (813) 455-2469, (813) 788-0010, td.donald@hotmail.com Note: It is worth contacting contractors to determine who knows how to properly design and implement FDR projects. They have a lot at stake, are in the high risk position and they are where the binder hits the dirt. 49 P99 50 P100 Additional Information / Forms Statement on Litigation Professional Engineering Certifications Eric Flavell, P.E. Lucas Anthony, P.E. Corporate Florida Registration Sworn statement of Disclosure of Relationship Firm's Insurance Requirement Acknowledgement Form Statement on Litigation Bowman Consulting is proud of our ability to serve our clients well and perform quality work. We are pleased to state that we have had no litigation within the last 5 years. Professional Engineering Certificates: Stat Boad Is licensed as a Prof Expitation: 212812017 Audit No: 228201723993 *da St Bo0 ra W-4 4 I,Bpr A"hM. n$ZOIM297 too rida &FBPE 471, Florida Statutes P.R. Lic. No: 76826 51 P101 Corporate Florida Registration State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD., INC. is a Virginia corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on November 30, 2012. The document number of this corporation is F12000004832 I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2015, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 8, 2015„ and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given a»der my Bared and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Thirtieth day of March, 2015 Secretary of State Traeldng Number: CU7932568972 To authenticate this certiricate,visit the following site,enter this number, and then fallow the instructions dispinyed. hf tps://services.su n biz.org/bili n gs/CertificnteOfS to tus/Certif icateAu thentica tion 52 P102 SWORN STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 105.08, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE, ON DISCLOSURE OF RELATIONSHIPS THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER AUTHORIZED TO ADMINISTER OATHS. 1. This sworn. statement MUST be submitted with Bid, Proposal or Contract No. 201 026 for $801 Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Prosect —571h Street to CR -510 (FOOT SCOP FM No. 434416-1) URC Project No. 1325) 2. This sworn statement is submitted by: V!)Q >n 1Q41 innsully'%Q Gly -24>6i I Til (Name of entity submitting Statement) whose business address is: L1450 W. eour r._11i,-rY �1�rrl,su1�Q232'1el�wv,, EL SI -55Y and its Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) ismer' '-f — t _' (07.16 1 3. Mynameis E.'61L J0kiayNn (Please print name of individual signing) and my relationship to the entity named above is &'CLyN r•H m n'.naQc1C 4. 1 understand that an "affiliate" as defined in Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, means: The term "affiliate" includes those officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active In the management of the entity. S. I understand that the relationship with a County Commissioner or County employee that must be disclosed as follows: Father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandparent, or grandchild. 6. Based on information and belief, the statement, which I have marked below, is true in relation to the entity submitting this sworn statement. [Please indicate which statement applies.) VNeither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in management of the entity, have any relationships as defined in section 105.08, Indian River County Code, with any County Commissioner or County employee. Page 10 of 11 53 P103 The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of the officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents, who are active in management of the entity have the following relationships with a County Commissioner or County employee: Name of Affiliate Name of County Commissioner Relationship or entity or employee STATE OF Ft0AW COUNTY Of t7X&WP The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z day of ✓my 20r6 by_ +�� who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC SIGN: _ 0%1 ' PRINT: A5"- $4WP Notary Public, State at large My Commission Expires: (Seal) d'� NEt! SHARP M�'.COMMISSIOIk 1 EE319679 .1 tl� ptp71tE5:l�h'�7016 Page 11 of 11 54 P104 ,JC Rte V CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE °;T;;;"°°°;5"' THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policypes) must be endorsed. It SUBROGATION IS WANED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In Ileu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Klein Agency, LLC. CONTACT NAME, 1x9: (410) 832-7600 I PAXN., (410)832-1649 P.O. Box 219 EKED ADDRESS, Timonium DID 21094 NSURERA3Iartford Fire Insurance INSURED _�—__ ____.____—_�_..,-_._ NSURERB$artford insurance CO — _ _casualty NsuRERcEartford Underwriters Ins Cc Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. NSURERD•RLI Insurance CwVamy 3863 Centerview Drive, WSURERE. Suite 300 Mm 0(P (A, one Palaarr) S 10,000 Chantilly VA 20151-3287 rnlr9oAr_cQ rCDITICU`ATC ullaaoCo.l R-1 A All wn F, k. omnclnu a1115fiOCo• THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WTH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPEOFINSURANCE ol., R NUMBERPOLICY ia6om{1905MMYpy, LIMITS Justin Klein/MB097ER -� X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRBJLE S 1,000,000 A I CLAIMS -MADE I X-1 OCCUR { _ DAMAGE TO REtJfiD _.... -.... _ PRBdISFS (Ea oeeurrmce) S 300,000 30UUNVJ9957 10/6/2015 110/6/2016 Mm 0(P (A, one Palaarr) S 10,000 X Cantraatual Liability I I PERSONAL 6 ADV INJURY S 1,000,000 GENL AGGREGATE APPLIES PER: j GENERN_AGGREGATE S 2,000,000 P OIT POLICY 1 X'._I JECT I ILOC I PRODUCTS. COMPIOP AGO S 2,000,000 OTHl3t S AUTOMOBILE L14BIUTY _ SINGLE LIMIT S 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY ft Person) 6 H X ANY AUTO BODILY INJIRY(Per acdd.4 S ALL OW4ED ED ASCHED SCHEDULED UTOS 30UZWJ9749 10/6/2015 110/6/2016 ED X R PROPERTY DAMAGE S HIRED AUros _ AUTlOS 5 I X UMBRELLA LIAR % OCCUR ( EACH OCCURRENCE S 119 000 000 AGGREGATE S 26,000,000 H .EKCESSLIAB CLARAufAADE� .3DXHUVJ7593 10/6/2015 10/6/2016 S RETENTION S V.11— F.= WORKERS COMPENSATION ( I X i PER I OM. AND EMPLOYERV LIABILITY YIN i I'! ..._LSIALUTF_ I.__.,.ER ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIE)IECUTNE —II OFFICERIMEMBER `i{NIA S EL EACH ACCIDH7T S_ 1,000000_ C EXCLUDED? IN (Mandatory In NH) -'{ SON912112870 10/6/2015 10/6/2016 EL. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYEES 1,000,000 M DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS b.1— EL DISEASE -POUCY LIMIT S 3.000.000 D Liability ROP0021965 10/6/2015 10/6/2016 Fnch Claim $5,000,000 lProfessional A99M92te $8,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES {ACORO 101. AddMonal ROMSMSSchedule, maybe touched N Mora Space Isnqutrsd) See Attachment for specific additional :n=ed wording. ®1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. A8 rights reSerVed. ACORD 26 (2014101) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS0251a71dntt 55 P105 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE • Insured's Sample Certificate 1234 Mast Main Street THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Anytown 12345 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Justin Klein/MB097ER -� ®1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. A8 rights reSerVed. ACORD 26 (2014101) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD INS0251a71dntt 55 P105 COMMENTS/REMARKS I£ required under an insured written contract, executed prior to any loss, Certificate Holder is an Additional Insured under the General Liability Policy, but only with respects to liability arising from work performed by or on behalf of Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. If required under an insured written contract, executed prior to any loss, Certificate Holder is an Additional Insured under the Automobile Policy, but only with respects to liability arising from the operation of vehicles by employees of Bowman Consulting Group, Ltd. If required under an insured written contract, executed prior to any loss, Waiver of Subrogation is provided for the certificate holder under the General Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers Compensation Policies. It is further understood that coverage provided the Additional Insured under the General Liability and Automobile Liability shall be primary and non-contributory to any other coverage available to the Additional Insured. L OFREMARK COPYRIGHT 2000, AMS SERVICES INC. ' 56 P106 Bowman C 0 N S U L T I N 6 www.bowmanconsuIting.com P107 Indian River County Purchasing Division 180027 th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Phone (772) 226-1416Ev"nt nDer O Fax (772) 770-5140 Request for Statements of Qualifications Project Name: 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Project - 57th Street to CR -510 (FDOT SCOP FM No. 436416-1) (IRC Project No. 1325) RFQ #: 2016026 RFQ Opening Date: July 29, 2016 RFQ Opening Time: 2:00 P.M. All Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) must be received by the Purchasing Division, 1800 271h Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 prior to the date and time shown above. Late responses will not be accepted or considered. PLEASE SUBMIT (1) ONE MARKED ORIGINAL AND FIVE (5) COPIES OF YOUR SOQ. Refer All Questions to: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager Phone: (772) 226-1416 Email: purchasing@ircgov.com Page 1 of 11 I P108 REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS RFQ # 2016026 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Project - 571h Street to CR -510 (FDOT SCOP FM No. 436416-1) (IRC Project No 1325) In compliance with CCNA Chapter 287.055, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners is requesting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from professional engineering firms for design of the 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Project - 57th Street to CR -510 (FDOT SCOP FM No. 436416-1) (IRC Project No. 1325) Detailed specifications for the above referenced RFQ are available from www.demandstar.com or by contacting the Indian River County Purchasing Division at (772) 226-1416, or purchasing@ircgov.com. Deadline for receipt of one original and five (5) copies of SOQs to the Purchasing Division, 1800 27th Avenue, Building B, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 is 2:00 a.m. Friday. July 29, 2016. Initial screening, ranking, final ranking and negotiations will be in accordance with the Consultant Competitive Negotiation Act, F.S. 287.055. The Board of County Commissioners reserves the right to accept or reject any and all submittals and to waive all informalities. Publish: For Publication in the Indian River Press Journal Date: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 Please furnish Tear Sheet, Affidavit of Publication, and Invoice to: Indian River County Purchasing Division 1800 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Page 2 of 11 PURCHASING MANAGER INDIAN RIVER COUNTY P109 Scope of Services 1. INTRODUCTION Project design will be for the rehabilitation of the existing pavement section of 58th Avenue (Kings Highway — CR613) between 57th Street and CR -510 utilizing a full depth reclamation process of the existing roadway materials, constructing five-foot paved shoulders, design of left turn lanes on all approaches to the intersection of 6911 Street, design of a traffic signal at 69th Street, replacement of the traffic signal at 58th Avenue and CR -510, culvert extensions and replacement as needed, and the placing of hot mix (superpave) asphalt. The length of the project is approximately 3 % miles. The project shall utilize a full depth reclamation process to mix the existing asphalt, base, and sub -base materials into a homogeneous mixture while adding a sufficient volume of asphalt emulsion to produce a nine -inch thick base material with a minimum structural number of 2.24. This mixture is graded, compacted, and resurfaced with hot mix asphalt (superpave). Construction of the five-foot paved shoulders will utilize excess material produced from the full depth reclamation process of the roadway. All existing above ground utility features shall be analyzed for relocation or adjustment as part of the design process. Project design shall include culvert extension and replacement as necessary for the project, to include analysis of conflicts with existing utilities. Design of pavement markings, bicycle lane markings, signage, and reflective pavement markers will be required as part of the project. All existing intersections containing sidewalk crossings shall be upgraded to current ADA requirements as part of the design process, to include pedestrian crossings at signalized intersections. All road work will be within the existing County and/or Drainage District right-of-way. The County will provide the existing condition topographical & right of way boundary survey of above ground features for the project. Design of a Maintenance of Traffic Plan will not be included within the proposed RFQ requirements. All necessary permitting for the project shall be required as part of the RFQ submittal. This is a Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) construction grant. Current FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction shall be utilized in the design, as well as Indian River County Traffic Engineering Division Special Conditions for Right -of -Way Construction. Page 3 of 11 Pilo Submittal Instructions Professional Engineering Firms (Consultants) responding to this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) shall submit the following in their Statement of Qualifications (SOQ): Information to Be Submitted: Submit one marked original and five (5) copies. SOQs must include and are requested to be organized as follows: a. An overview of the firm (including status as a minority firm, if applicable), to include a description of the range of services offered by of the Consultant. b. Summaries or biographies of the required Consultant Staff that will be assigned to the County. Include name, background, special skills, number of years with the firm and years of experience. Identify the Consultant's representative assigned to manage the County's project. c. A detailed description of the Consultant's approach to successful completion of services such as those described within this RFQ. Include schedule and budget compliance as well as availability of proposed staff. d. A description of expertise or unique capability Consultant can provide the County. e. Provide a projected timeline/schedule with the Consultant's methodology. f. References from municipalities Consultant has provided the similar services for in the last five years. Please provide contact name, phone number, email address and project name. g. Sworn statement on Disclosure of Relationships as per Section 105.08 of the Indian River County Code. Method of Selection: The County shall convene a Selection Review Committee of which the responsibility shall be as follows: a. Independently evaluate each Submittal. b. Independently rank each Submittal for meeting minimum qualifications in order of preference. c. Asa "committee of the whole", develop a combined ranking order of all Submittals meeting minimum qualifications. The ranking of firms shall be done in the following manner: 1. Each member of the evaluation committee shall evaluate each firm by assigning a number of points for each criterion and then totaling the number of points for all criteria. Each committee member shall then rank the firms on the basis of the total number of points received for all criteria, with the firm receiving the most points being ranked # 1. 2. The rankings received by each firm from all committee members shall then be totaled and divided by the number of committee members, to produce an average ranking. 3. The firm receiving the lowest average ranking (i.e. closest to # 1) shall be ranked the # 1 firm, and the process repeated until all firms have been ranked according to their average ranking. In the event of a tie the members of the Review Committee shall discuss their reasons for their individual rankings until member or members agree to revise their rankings accordingly until tie is broken. 4. After interviews in an RFQ process, and based upon information learned during the interviews, each committee member may change his or her ranking of firms. The evaluation process shall continue until the evaluation committee declares the rankings final. d. The County may, solely at its own option, seek additional Statements of Qualifications with this or a similar RFQ in the event the County, solely at its own option, determines that the quantity and/or quality of Submittals received is insufficient to meet the County's needs and/or that award of a contract arising from this RFQ would not be in the public interest. Page 4 of 11 P111 e. The Committee shall forward its recommendations in accordance with the ranking to the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners, which shall, at.its sole option, authorize negotiations of a contract pursuant to the requirements of Florida law. f. The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners possesses sole authority to award a contract for the services sought herein. Criteria for Award: EVALUATION CRITERIA EVALUATION POINTS MAXIMUM 1. Firm qualifications/capabilities and similar projects 25 2. Staff qualifications 20 3. Approach 20 4. Proposed Timeline 15 5. Alternative Design Methods 10 6. References 10 TOTAL 100 Page 5 of 11 I P112 General Instructions Sealed Submittals and Envelope Markings: All responses shall be submitted in a sealed envelope or box. The outside of the envelope shall be clearly marked with the Consultant's Name and Return Address, Proposal #, Title, Date of opening, and Time of Opening. Opening Location: Responses must be received by the Purchasing Division at 1800 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, on or before the closing hour and date listed in the Request for Proposals. SOQs received after the stated time and date will not be accepted or considered. Submission: Submit one marked original and five (5) copies of your SOQ. Taxes: Indian River County is exempt from any taxes imposed by State and / or Federal Government. Exemption Certificates, if required, are to be furnished by the successful Consultant and will be filled out by the County. Indemnification: The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County and its commissioners, officers, employees and agents, from any and all losses, damages, expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees) and other liabilities of any type whatsoever, arising out of or relating to any negligence, intentional tort, breach of contract, or breach of applicable law by the consultants, or its employees, agents, subconsultants, or other persons or entities performing work under the contract. Public Access: The Consultant shall comply with Florida's Public Records Law in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Specifically, the Consultant shall keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required by the County in order to perform the service. The Consultant shall provide the public with access to public records on the same terms and conditions that the County would provide the records at a cost that does not exceed the costs provided in Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law. The Consultant shall ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized bylaw. The Consultant shall meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to the County, all public records in possession of the Consultant upon termination of the contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the County. Public Entity Crimes: Pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 287.133(2)(a), all Consultants are hereby notified that a person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity (defined as the State of Florida, any of its departments or agencies, or any political subdivision); may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Florida Statutes Section 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO [currently $35,000] for a. period of 36 months from the date of being'placed on the convicted vendor list. A "public entity crime" means a violation of any state or federal law by a person with respect to and directly related to the transaction of business with any public entity or with an agency or political subdivision of any other state or with the United States, including, but not limited to, any bid, proposal, reply, or contract for goods or services, any lease for real property, or any contract for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, involving antitrust, fraud, theft, bribery, collusion, racketeering, conspiracy, or material misrepresentation. Page 6 of 11 P113 i- Non -Discrimination: Indian River County will not knowingly do business with vendors or contractors who discriminate on the basis of race, color or national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age and/or disability. Through the course of providing services to the County, Contractors shall affirmatively comply with all applicable provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, as well as all other applicable regulations, guidelines and standards. Any person who believes their rights have been violated should report such discrimination to the County's Title VI/Nondiscrimination Coordinator through the office of the County Attorney. Local Preference: Indian River County has no local ordinance or preferences, as defined in FS 255.0991(2) in place, therefore no preference prohibited by that section will be considered in the acceptance, review or award of this bid. Regulations: It shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to assure compliance with any OSHA, EPA and / or other Federal or State of Florida rules, regulations, or other requirements, as each may apply. Interpretations: No oral interpretations will be made to any Consultant as to the meaning of the RFQ documents. Every request for such an interpretation shall be made in writing, addressed and forwarded to Indian River County (purchasing@ircgov.com) ten (10) or more days before the date fixed for opening of the RFQ. The County shall not be responsible for oral interpretations given by any County employee. Every interpretation made to Consultants will be in the form of an Addendum, which if issued, will be sent promptly as is practical to all persons to whom RFQ documents have been issued. All such Addenda shall become part of the RFQ documents. Further, it shall be the responsibility of each Consultant, prior to submitting their SOO, to contact Indian River County's Purchasing Division at (772) 226-1416 to determine if addenda were issued and to make such addenda a part of their SOQ. Applicable Law and Venue. Contract(s) resulting from this RFQ and all rights and duties of the parties hereto shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida, including but not limited to the provisions of the Florida Uniform Commercial Code Chapters 671-679 F.S., for any terms and conditions not specifically stated in this Order. Venue for any lawsuit brought by either party against the other party or otherwise arising out of this Contract shall be in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of a federal jurisdiction, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Conflict of Interest: Any entity submitting a bid, proposal, qualifications or entering into a contract with the County shall disclose any relationship that may exist between the contracting entity and a County Commissioner or a County Employee. The relationship with a County Commissioner or a County Employee that must be disclosed is as follows: father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandparent, or grandchild. The term "affiliate" includes those officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in the management of the entity. The disclosure of relationships shall be a sworn statement made on a County approved form. Failure to submit the form will be cause for rejection of the bid or proposal. Prohibition Against Contingent Fees: If a contract is entered resulting from this request for qualifications, it shall include a prohibition against contingent fees statement, as required by FS 255.087. Right to Protest: Any actual or prospective responding Consultant who is aggrieved in connection with a competitive selection process may protest to the Purchasing Manager. The protest shall be submitted to the Purchasing Manager in writing within seven (7) calendar days after the bidder or proposer knows or should have Page 7 of 11 P114 known of the facts giving rise to the protest. If the protest is not resolved by mutual agreement, the Purchasing Manager shall promptly issue a decision in writing, after consulting the Department and the Office of the County Attorney. Awards: The County reserves the right to cancel the solicitation, reject any and all SOQs or waive any irregularity or technicality in submittals received. The County reserves the right to not make any award(s) under this solicitation. Termination by the County: The County reserves the right to terminate a contract by giving thirty (30) days notice, in writing, of the intention to terminate, if at any time the Consultant fails to abide by or fulfill any of the terms and conditions of the contract. The County also reserves the right to terminate this contract for convenience of the County and / or with or without cause. Compliance with Laws and Regulations: Consultant agrees that they will comply with all Federal, State, and Local Laws and Regulations applicable to the production, sale, and delivery of the goods or the furnishing of any labor or services called for by this order, and any provisions required thereby to be included herein shall be deemed to be incorporated herein by reference. Noncompliance may be considered grounds for termination of contracts. Insurance: The Consultant shall provide, prior to execution of the contract, the insurance required under this section for approval by the County. Firm's insurance shall be primary. The County shall be named as an additional insured for both General Liability and Automobile Liability. The awarded firm shall maintain the following limits of insurance during the term duration of this agreement. General Liability Each Occurrence $500,000 Fire Damage -any one fire $50,000 Medical Expenses -any one person $5,000 Personal and Advertising Injury $500,000 General Aggregate $500,000 Combined Single Limit $500,000 Automobile Liability — Combined Single Limit $500,000 Worker's Compensation as required by the State of Florida Each accident $100,000 Each Disease — Each employee $100,000 Each disease — policy limit $500,000 Professional Liability Insurance $1,000,000 per occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate combined single limit $5,000 maximum deductible per claim The policy shall cover the firm, all employees, and/or volunteers, and all independent contractors, subcontractors and professional contractual persons hired or retained by contractor. Page 8 of 11 P115 All above insurance policies shall be placed with insurers with a Best's rating of no less than A -VII. The insurer chosen shall also be licensed to do business in Florida. The insurance policies procured shall be "Claims Made" policies or as generally available on the open insurance market. The Insurance Carriers shall supply Certificates of Insurance evidencing such coverage to the Indian River County Risk Management Department prior to the execution of this Agreement. The insurance companies selected shall send written verification to the Indian River County Risk Management Department that they will provide 30 days written notice to the Indian River County Department of Risk Management of its intent to cancel or terminate. Indian River County reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals in whole or in part and waive all any technicality or Irregularity. Page 9 of 11 P116 SWORN STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 105.08, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY CODE, ON DISCLOSURE OF RELATIONSHIPS THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER AUTHORIZED TO ADMINISTER OATHS. 1. This sworn statement MUST be submitted with Bid, Proposal or Contract No. 2016026 for 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacine Project — 57th Street to CR -510 (FDOT SCOP FM No. 434416-1) ORC Proiect No.1325) 2. This sworn statement is submitted by: (Name of entity submitting Statement) whose business address is: and its Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) is My name is (Please print name of individual signing) and my relationship to the entity named above is 4. 1 understand that an "affiliate" as defined in Section 105.08, Indian River County Code, means: The term "affiliate" includes those officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in the management of the entity. understand that the relationship with a County Commissioner or County employee that must be disclosed as follows: Father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandparent, or grandchild. 6. Based on information and belief, the statement, which I have marked below, is true in relation to the entity submitting this sworn statement. [Please indicate which statement applies.] Neither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in management of the entity, have any relationships as defined in section 105.08, Indian River County Code, with any County Commissioner or County employee. Page 10 of 11 P117 The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of the officers, directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents, who are active in management of the entity have the following relationships with a County Commissioner or County employee: Name of Affiliate or entity STATE OF COUNTY OF Name of County Commissioner or employee Relationship (Signature) (Date) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of .20 by who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC SIGN: PRINT: Notary Public, State at large My Commission Expires: (Seal) Page 11 of 11 P118 Boman C© N S U L T 1 N G April 26, 2017 Melbourne Office 4450 W. Eau Gallie Blvd., Suite 232 Melbourne, Florida 32934 (321) 255-5434 Fax (321) 255-7751 www.bowmanconsulting.com Mr. James Ennis, P.E. EXH-1 BIT C Indian River County Engineering Division 1800 2711 Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Subject: Revised 2nd Fee Proposal for 58th Avenue Pavement Reclamation and Resurfacing Project — 57th Street to CR -510 (FDOT SOP FM No. 436416-1) (IRC Project No. 1325) Dear Mr. Ennis, Enclosed please find our contract for the subject project ready to execute. Scope of Services Project Team: Bowman Consulting Group Project Management and Civil Engineering Project Manager — Eric L. Flavell Lassiter Transportation Group Si nalization, signing and pavement markings Bechtol Engineering & Testing Geotechnical Engineering, FDR section design, testing Evers Infrastructure Group, - FDR Specifications Bowman Consulting Group Utility research and coordination Bowman Consulting Group Permitting Ground Hound Detector Services Underground Utility Locates / soft digs Changes to the project team will be confirmed with the County prior to any changes being made. SERVICES. INFORMATION AND DELIVERABLES TO BE PROVIDED BY ENGINEER Preliminary Engineering 1. Engineer will attend up to two meetings with the County (Kick-off and toward the completion of this phase) to review the project, and we will prepare agenda and summary meeting notes for each meeting. BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL I)o\1�11ianconwiling.colll Page 1 of 14 P119 2. Engineer will review record information provided by County, anticipated to be assessor's plans, improvement plans, studies, atlases and other information that is made available 3. Engineer will assemble design criteria for the project for the County's review and approval. 4. Subsurface Utility Engineering and Utility Coordination: Within the boundaries of the project area the Engineer will identify utility facilities and request plans from the utility owners located within the corridor in order to identify conflicts that exist between utility facilities and the proposed construction project. This task will generally consist of the following: BCG INITIAL Page 2 of 14 a. Identify utilities: The Engineer will identify and contact Utilities within the project area that may be affected by the project. The Engineer will send Utility Verification Letters with a map or other location information showing where the work will occur. This step will involve a meeting with the utilities and could involve one site visit if deemed appropriate by the Utility. b. Verify facility information: After identifying which Utilities are located within the project area the Engineer will send out a letter with copies of topographic survey and preliminary design to all Utilities, requesting verification of utility locations and any concerns. c. Verify specific locations of subsurface utilities: The Engineer will contract with an experienced Subsurface Utility Locating provider to define detectable utilities within the project area. At the two signalized intersections being replaced, the Engineer will perform GPR reconnaissance and identify where soft digs / vacuum excavation will be used to verify the depths of buried lines. Information gathered from the subsurface utility locate work will be incorporated into the design. Based on initial field reconnaissance the Engineer believes that soft digs / vacuum excavation will be necessary to identify the location and depth of certain utilities within the project area. The number of test pits have been identified in the schedule below: INTERSECTION # OF SOFT DIGS UTILITIES IDENTIFIED 58TH Ave and CR 510 8 Gas, electric, water, sewer FM, reuse, fiber/ telephone 58th Ave and 69th Street 10 Electric, water, sewer FM, reuse, fiber / telephone This task assumes that the County will, survey locate the utilities identified by the Subsurface Utility locate but not shown on the survey provided by the County. This will include horizontal location of GPR locates, and vertical and horizontal location of soft digs. The Engineer will notify the County of the Subsurface Utility locator's schedule of work in order to assist with coordinating survey location of located utilities. CLIENT INITIAL P120 d. Identify and resolve utility conflicts: The Engineer will provide affected Utilities with preliminary plans for review with the intent to show conflicts with existing facilities. The Engineer will, if necessary, arrange for one meeting with the affected utilities in order to determine design changes, or potential relocation of facilities by the Utility. The Engineer will meet with the County and discuss potential solutions to identified utility conflicts. e. Incorporate design changes/relocations: The Engineer, using information gathered in previous steps will incorporate the design changes or utility relocations as needed to accommodate the project. At the time of preparing this proposal we have identified that a 30" waterline will need to be relocated at 69th street. We have also identified the drainage culvert at this location will need to be extended to accommodate the proposed intersection improvements. Utility relocation design is limited to these two items in this proposal. 5. Geotechnical engineer will core and bore sample existing flexible pavement section materials and underlying soils in order to identify and report existing conditions throughout the subject area. Provide 20' deep bores at 8 locations (one for each signal foundation) and provide structural design parameters for foundation design. Samples of flexible pavement section materials obtained will be utilized in laboratory testing for development of a Full Depth Reclamation mix design blend(s). Consideration will be given to admixture quantity, costs, desired structural coefficient and constructability. Final design blend(s) recommendations will be provided. 6. Engineer will prepare Master Plan layout and preliminary design at 1" = 40' scale on 36" x 96" sheets that includes horizontal alignment of proposed improvements, and typical sections at key locations. Final product will be in AutoCAD format. At the intersections of 58th Avenue with69t' Street, the Engineer will include conceptual intersection layouts with proposed modifications to horizontal geometry to accommodate additional vehicular use lanes, cross -walks, signal structure locations, proposed head alignments, cabinet locations, and power sources. Limits of work: • 58th Avenue from southerly edge 57th Street to southerly edge CR -510 7. Engineer will identify issues and conflicts that affect proposed road improvements and drainage. 8. Engineer will develop opinion of construction cost of proposed improvements and any alternatives being considered. BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 3 of 14 P121 9. Engineer will included field review at the start of the project that includes walking the road and photographing driveway geometry for a record of existing conditions. 10. Meeting notes will be used to memorialize decisions made throughout the design process. No summary report will be prepared. Deliverables: (1 copy) — AutoCAD Master Plan drawing of proposed improvements in digital form on CD. Final Design 11. Permitting: Prior to preparation and submittal of the necessary permit applications the Engineer will attend up to one (1) pre -application meeting, and one (1) review meeting for each agency identified below. The permit applications will be submitted to the various agencies as soon as the drawings are completed to the extent they can be submitted. Any applications requiring signature will be routed to the County for signature. The Engineer assumes all permit application fees will be paid by the County. The Engineer anticipates up to two (2) rounds of reasonable comments from each agency during the permitting review process. The Engineer will prepare and submit the following permit applications for the work within the project area: a. St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) The scope assumes an Exemption will be allowed under 26-330.051 F.A.C. for the linear FDR portion of the project. The Engineer assumes that the existing roadside swale system has sufficient capacity to accommodate the increased impervious area with minor changes such as adjusting volume retained in the swales. Design and permitting of new stormwater treatment features through SJRWMD is specifically excluded from this scope. b. Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD) Permit The Engineer anticipates that culvert extensions and replacements and possibly new culverts will be required within the IRFWCD canals within the project area. The Engineer will prepare and submit permit applications as needed to support the work within the project area. c. FDEP NPDES Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities The Engineer will assist the County's Contractor in preparing and submitting the Notice of Intent (NOI) for the proposed project. The Engineer at this time assumes that any dewatering required for the project can occur under the terms of the Generic Permit (i.e. no contaminated site exists within 500 feet of the areas to be dewatered.) BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 4 of 14 P122 d. FDEP Water Distribution System Construction Permit The Engineer believes that the relocation of existing water mains within the project area may require FDEP Permitting. The Engineer will coordinate review of the plans and design with the Indian River County Utilities Department (IRCUD) as part of the scope of work. A separate permit from the IRCUD is not in the scope, as this is a County directed project. e. FDOT Project Review Submittal We will prepare a 90% complete submittal for FDOT administrative and constructability review of the project. We anticipate responding to the FDOT comments along with other comments we receive from the 90% review. The incorporation of these comments will represent the 100% complete drawings. 12. We anticipate limited drainage calculations may be required for permit items a) and b) above: The project is anticipated to require minor modification (in kind realignment due to widening) to roadside swales and the installation, if required, of side drain pipes under the driveways equivalent to the nearest upstream and downstream existing side drain. Detailed drainage calculations and basin analysis to document swale capacity and side drain size are not included for work proposed on 58th Avenue. For the left turn additions at 69"' Street, we will prepare calculations for submittal to SJRWMD and IRFWCD to demonstrate that the project meets applicable District Standards. The project is anticipated to utilize existing stormwater treatment systems within the right of way. This scope assumes that no new ponds or other significant drainage features will be added. 13. Engineer will attend up to one meeting during this phase at 90%. Engineer will prepare agenda and summary meeting notes for each meeting. We will also perform bi-weekly teleconferences during the course of design. These meetings and conferences will be used to address issues and to keep the County informed on progress. No meeting notes will be prepared for the teleconferences. 14. Engineer will prepare signed and sealed set of Traffic Signal Design (TSD) plans for the project intersections suitable for bidding and construction. The plans shall be prepared to FDOT and County standards and shall include luminaires on each of the structures. 15. Engineer will prepare signed and sealed set of Signing and Pavement Marking (S&PM) plans for the project intersections suitable for bidding and construction. The plans shall be prepared to FDOT and County standards. 16. Engineer will design and prepare signed and sealed set of proposed road improvements, anticipated to be, road widening, intersection upgrades, curb and gutter and sidewalk modifications, surface drainage, ADA upgrades, utility relocates, and conforms to existing pavement surface. Prepare drawings on 11' x 17" sheets. These sheets will include road, utility and drainage information. See attached drawing list. BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 5 of 14 P123 • 6911 Street as required for conform to intersection geometric changes estimated at 850' in each direction on 69th street 17. Engineer will incorporate General Provisions provided by the County, and prepare Special Provisions (Technical Specifications) in County Public Works Department format. In addition to the technical specifications for proposed materials and methods. Prepare unit price bid schedule with bid descriptions describing the work for each bid item. Prepare technical specifications in MS Word format. 18. Engineer will develop one engineer's opinion of construction cost at approximately 90% milestone and make adjustments for final submittal. Cost breakdown will match the bid schedule. 19. Perform field review of drawings to evaluate design with existing conditions. Deliverables: Drawings (90%) (1 copy) — Full size and (3 copies) — Reduced size on bond Drawings (Final Plans) Specs (1 Copy) on bond unbound, (1 copy) on CD each submittal Opinion of Construction Cost in Bid Schedule Format at 90% and final (1 Copy) on bond Post Design Services 20. Attend Pre -Bid Conference 21. Engineer will respond to bidders' questions and assist with the preparation of addenda. Construction Services 22. To be determined (not included in this contract) BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 6 of 14 P124 SERVICES AND/OR INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY County County will provide the following services and/or information: Available record -drawings of existing surface improvements and County -owned utilities and other substructures. Access to GIS information and deliver information in electronic format if available. 2. Prepare topographic mapping suitable for drawings at 1" = 20' scale, cross sections at 50' O. C. for roads with shots that extend 25' beyond RNV, detail intersections at CR510/69th/57th suitable for 1" = 10' scale drawings and survey minimum 850' beyond returns on 69th Street, all other intersections survey minimum 100' beyond returns, survey all connecting driveways 30' beyond RNV, locate all utilities and improvements that will be impacted by improvements, station road, provide RNV and easement information suitable for preparation of layout drawings, survey horizontal locations of locate soft digs, we anticipate additional shots will be required at select locations during design and we will make every effort to bundle them. 3. Copies of County Standard Specifications and of Road Standards and associated details 4. Provide County "boiler plate front end" specifications and any State or Federal documents that are required to be incorporated into the specifications 5. MOT Plans will be provided by the County 6. Provide traffic counts and traffic speed surveys and other traffic evaluations as required for the project. 7. Confirm road typical sections, including sidewalk, road and lane widths 8. Perform timely reviews of information presented and timely responses for information requested by Engineer team 9. Print contract documents for advertising for bids SPECIFIC CONTRACT EXCLUSIONS Specifically not included in the above scope of services or compensation are the following: 1. Engineer will not have any involvement with hazardous waste including detection, evaluation, management and cleanup. 2. Engineer will not prepare any environmental or project impact evaluations, boundary surveying for easements and acquisitions, land acquisition identification or document preparation. BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 7 of 14 P125 3. Engineer will not perform any hydraulic or hydrology analysis. Drainage facilities that are extended or relocated will be in kind. Engineer will prepare a drainage calculations suitable for permitting as described in Scope of Services above. Drainage facilities and amenities will be FDOT standards. No structural engineering design has been included with this contract except light and signal foundations as described in Scope of Services above. 4. Construction services have not been included in this scope of services 5. MOT plans have not been included in this scope of services 6. Guide Sign Design beyond 3 street name signs 7. Traffic signal retiming 8. Lighting design 9. Design documentation beyond meeting minutes End Scope of Services BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 8 of 14 P126 Project Sheet Count DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. SCALE FIRM KEY SHEET G-1 N/ABCG SUMMARY OF PAY ITEMS G-2 N/A BCG SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES G-3 N/A BCG SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES G-4 N/A BCG TYPICAL SECTIONS TS -1 N/A BCG TYPICAL SECTIONS TS -2 N/A BCG ROAD DETAILS TS -3 N/A BCG ROAD DETAILS TS -4 N/A BCG GENERAL NOTES N-1 NIA BCG PROJECT LAYOUT 'PL -1 1"=100 BCG PROJECT LAYOUT PL -2 1"=100 BCG PROJECT LAYOUT PL -3 1"=100 BCG PROJECT LAYOUT PL -4 1"=100 BCG PROJECT LAYOUT PL -5 1"=100 BCG PROJECT LAYOUT . PL -6 V=100 BCG PROJECT LA YOUT PL -7 V=100 BGG 58th AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS - 57" INTERSECTION R-1 111=40' BCG 57TH STREET ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-2 1"=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-3 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-4 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-5 1"=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-6 1"=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-7 1"=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-8 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-9 1"=40' SCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-10 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-11 V=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-12 1"=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-13 11)=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-14 1"=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-15 1"=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-16 V=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-17 1"=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-18 1 =40' BGG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-19 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS - 69TH INTERSECTION R-20 1"=40' BCG 69TH STREET ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-21 V=40' BCG 69TH STREET ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-22 1 "=40' BCG 69TH STREET ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-23 1 "=40 BCG 69T14 STREET ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-24 1 "=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-25 111=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-26 1"=40' SCG BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 9 of 14 i• P127 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-27 111=40' BCG 5891 AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-28 1 "=40' BCG 580 AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-29 1"=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R40 1 "=40' BCG 58M AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-31 1"=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 4-32 1"=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-33 1 "=40' BCG 58th AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-34 1"=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-35 1 "=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-36 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-37 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-38 1 "=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-39 1"=40' BCG 580 AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-40 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-41 1"=40' BCG 58m AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-42 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-43 1"=40' BCG 581h AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-44 1"=40' BCG 581* AVENUE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS R-45 V=40' BCG 581* AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS - SR 510 INTERSECTION R-46 1"=40? BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -1 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -2 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -3 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -4 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -5 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -6 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -7 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -8 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -9 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -10 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -11 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -12 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -13 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -14 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -15 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -16 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -17 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -18 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -19 TBD SCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -20 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -21 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -22 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -23 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -24 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -25 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -26 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -27 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -28 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -29 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -30 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -31 TBD BCG BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 10 of 14 P128 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -32 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -33 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -34 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -35 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -36 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -37 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -38 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -39 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -40 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -41 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -42 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -43 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -44 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -45 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -46 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -47 TBD BCG 58TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -48 TBD BCG 69TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -49 TBD BCG 69TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -50 TBD BCG 69TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -51 TBD BCG 69TH AVENUE CROSSECTIONS CS -52 TBD BCG DRAINAGE DETAILS DD -1 TBD BCG DRAINAGE DETAILS DD -2 TBD BCG STORM DRAIN PROFILES DD -3 TBD BCG STORM DRAIN PROFILES DD -4 TBD BCG UTILITY PROFILES DD -5 TBD BCG ROADWAY SOIL SURVEY GEO-1 N/A BCG ROADWAY SOIL SURVEY GEO-2 N/A BCG ROADWAY SOIL SURVEY GEO-3 N/A BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -1 1"=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -2 1"=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -3 1"=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -4 1"=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -5 1"=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -6 V=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -7 1"=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -8 1"=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS SP -9 1"=100' BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILS SP -10 NIA BCG STORMWATER POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILS SP -11 N/A BCG SIGNALIZAT/ON 58TH AVENUE KEY SHEET T-1 N/A LTG SUMMARY OF PAY ITEMS T-2 N/A LTG GENERAL NOTES T-3 N/A LTG GENERAL NOTES T-4 N/A LTG PLAN SHEET 58TH AT 69TH T-5 1"=40' LTG PLAN SHEET 58TH AT CR510 T-6 1"=40' LTG 58TH AT 57TH SIGNAL DETAILS T-7 1"=40' LTG BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 11 of 14 P129 58TH AT 69TH SIGNAL DETAILS T-8 N/A LTG 58TH AT CR 510 SIGNAL DETAILS T-10 N/A LTG 58TH AT 69TH SPAN WIRE TABULATION T-11 N/A LTG 58TH AT CR 510 SPAN WIRE TABULATION T-12 N/A LTG SPECIAL DETAILS T-13 N/A LTG GUIDE SIGN T-14 N/A LTG GUIDE SIGN T-15 N/A LTG GEOTECHNICAL SHEET T-16 N/A LTG 58TH AVENUE SIGNING & PAVEMENT DELINEATION PLAN KEY SHEET S-1 N/A LTG TAB OF QUANTITIES S-2 N/A LTG TAB OF QUANTITIES S-3 N/A LTG TAB OF QUANTITIES S-4 N/A LTG TAB OF QUANTITIES S-5 N/A LTG GENERAL NOTES S-6 N/A LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-7 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-8 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-9 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-10 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-11 111=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-12 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-13 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-14 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-15 111=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-16 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-17 1"=40, LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-18 V=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-19 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-20 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-21 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-22 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-23 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-24 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-25 V=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-26 V=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-27 1 "=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-28 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-29 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-30 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-31 111=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-32 111=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-33 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-34 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-35 V=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-36 111=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-37 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-38 111=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-39 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-40 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-41 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-42 1"=40' LTG BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 12 of 14 P130 MAINLINE PLANS S-43 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-44 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-45 1"=40' LTG MAINLINE PLANS S-46 1"=40' LTG SIDE STREET PLANS - 57TH STREET S-47 111=40' LTG SIDE STREET PLANS - 57TH STREET S-48 111=40' LTG SIDE STREET PLANS - 69TH STREET S-49 1.1=4V LTG SIDE STREET PLANS - 69TH STREET S-50 111=40' LTG SIDE STREET PLANS - 69TH STREET S-51 1"=40' LTG SIDE STREET PLANS - 69TH STREET S-52 1 "=40' LTG SIDE STREET PLANS - CR510 S-53 1"=40' LTG SIDE STREET PLANS - CR510 S-56 V=40' LTG GUIDE SIGNS SHEETS S-57 N/A LTG GUIDE SIGNS SHEETS S-58 N/A LTG GUIDE SIGNS SHEETS S-59 N/A LTG 9 mo TOTAL 208 Proposed Project Schedule -Description Time Total Time Preliminary Engineering Notice to Proceed Survey and Too Mapping b Count Complete Meeting (Kick-off) Utility Research 6 wks 6 wks Geotechnical Evaluation 8 wks 8 wks Layout proposed alignment and typical sections 8 wks 8 wks Identify constraints and prepare cost estimate 2 wks 10 wks Meeting review constraints and costs refine project, in-progressplans) Agency Review of In Progress Plans 2 wks 12 wks Final Design Start Final Design Design to approximately 60% complete 12 wks 24 wks Design to approximately 90% complete 6 wks 30 wks Meet to review design, specs and costs Plan checking FDOT, County,in-house and field 5 wks 35 wks Address comments and complete deliver final bid documents 4 wks 39 wks 9 mo BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 13 of 14 P131 Fees Consultant Cost Summary Consultant Amount Bowman Consulting Group 1 ! $ 206,546 Lassiter Transportation Group I ; $ 129,560 Bechtol Engineering and Testing j ! $ 50,360 Evers Infrastructure Group ! j ! $ 3,000 Ground Hound Detection Services ! $ 8,280 Tota 1 $ 397,746 Sincerely, BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD. Erik Juliano, PE, PSM Branch Manager Indian River County hereby accepts all terms and conditions of this Proposal (including the Standard Terms and Conditions) and authorizes BCG to proceed with the Project. By: (Signature) Printed Name: Title: Date: I . I` BCG INITIAL CLIENT INITIAL Page 14 of 14 P132 CONSENT AGENDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET PURCHASING DIVISION DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Mike Smykowski, Director, Office of Management and Budget FROM: Jennifer Hyde, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: Rejection of Bids 2017042 and 2017043 BACKGROUND: The Board previously authorized the purchase of two parcels along 26th Street to acquire the right-of- way necessary for planned widening, as well as the subsequent sealed bid sale of any remaining property. The remaining properties, 2605 52nd Avenue (Bid 2017042) and 2625 54th Avenue (Bid 2017043) were posted and advertised for sale, with sealed bids on both properties accepted and opened on May 12, 2017. The Purchasing Division has determined it failed to advertise the sale in accordance with F.S. 125.35, which requires the notice to appear once a week for at least two weeks. Because the ads appeared in the newspaper only once, the County is prohibited from selling real property under these bids. Previous sealed bid sales approved by to the Board were appropriately advertised, and the error relates only to these two properties. The cost to advertise the re -bid is estimated at $600.00 and is available in Traffic Impact Fees/District II/ROW 26th Street, 43rd Ave to 66th Ave account #10215241-066120-06011. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners reject all bids received for bids 2017042 and 2017043 and direct staff to rebid the properties in compliance with F.S. 125.35. P133 0J Office of Consent 05/23/2017 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Dylan'Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works DirectoQ, FROM: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney DATE: May 17, 2017 ATTORNEY SUBJECT: Extension of Lease and Agreed Notice to Vacate Property - Mermaid Carwash 1935 43rd Avenue, Vero Beach, FL The County purchased the Mermaid Carwash owned by Timothy and Joshana Tynes on December 16, 2008. The property consists of a 0.47 acre lot with a 2 -bay automatic carwash and 3 self-service wash bays with covered vacuum area. The facility was built in 1984. As part of the consideration for the purchase of the property, the County leased the property back to the tenant with the lease commencing on December 29, 2008 and expiring on March 31, 2010, for the amount of one dollar per month. Since that time, Mermaid Carwash has paid fair market value rent to the County. The current rent is $1,750 per month and Mermaid Carwash has been a prompt and responsible tenant for the past 7 years. The County's lease with Mermaid Carwash expired on April 30, 2017, but continues on a month-to-month basis. The lease can be terminated or non -renewed with 60 days' notice to the other party, and the County gave Mermaid Carwash notice of non -renewal on February 17, 2017 (letter attached). In June 2015, the County and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) entered into a County Incentive Grant Program Locally Funded Agreement whereby FDOT would acquire the needed right-of-way for the SR 60/431 Avenue intersection improvements with the cost of acquisition to be split equally between the parties. The FDOT uses the uniform method of right-of-way acquisition which requires payment of relocation expenses and certifying that the right-of-way is: • Owned by FDOT or the local governmental agency in fee simple interest; and • Has been cleared of any improvements; and • Is ready for construction of the project The uniform method also requires a 90 -day notice to owners in possession subject to a lease that they must vacate the property. A copy of the 90 -day FDOT Letter of Assurance to Mermaid Carwash is attached. P134 Mermaid Carwash, Inc May 17, 2017 Page 2 The County acquired the carwash site to use the property as a possible cure plan parcel, dividing the lot between the Cumberland Farms convenience store to the south and the Szechuan Palace restaurant to the north. The FDOT is in the process of finalizing appraisals, making good faith offers and negotiating with the landowners for needed rights-of-way. As the County will be responsible for demolition of the improvements, staff would like to end the lease agreement with Mermaid Carwash and begin the demolition bidding process. Mermaid Carwash is being asked to vacate the property as of August 31, 2017. Staff has no objection to the 120 -day extension of the current lease and requests the Board of County Commissioners consider the extension to allow the tenant adequate time to cease operation and vacate the property. The Tynes have agreed to the extension and have signed the Extension of Lease and Agreed Notice to Vacate. FUNDING. There is no impact to County funds associated with this Extension of Lease and Notice to Vacate. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of the 120 -day extension so the lease will terminate on August 31, 2017 and authorize the Chairman to execute the Extension of Lease and Agreed Notice to Vacate. ATTACHMENTS IRC Letter to Tynes FDOT Letter of Assurance to Tynes Extension of Lease and Agreed Notice to Vacate Copies to: Timothy and Joshana Tynes, Mermaid Carwash, Inc. Robin Brisebois, FDOT P135 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE OF COUNTY A TTORNEY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney February 17, 2017 Timothy and Joshana Tynes 1935 43rd Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 Re: State Road 60/431d Avenue Improvements Dear Tim and Joshana: When the County first began right-of-way acquisition for this project, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) was not providing funds for purchasing the needed parcels. That is why you dealt directly with County staff and the County Attorney's Office in negotiating the purchase and lease of the carwash property. Recently, the FDOT has offered to assist the County with right-of-way acquisition and has sent out notices to affected property and business owners and has begun negotiations with those parties. Since your parcel was already required, you were not notified. In the 2010 Lease Agreement with the County and subsequent extensions,, the term of the lease ran from May 1 to April 30 with either party able to terminate the lease with 60 days written notice. Now that the FDOT has taken over right-of- way acquisition, they require that the right-of-way be certified ready for construction, meaning that all buildings must be demolished before the project is put out to bid. As we discussed in my office recently, it will soon be necessary to give you the required 60 day notice to terminate of your lease as the FDOT would like to begin clearing the right-of-way in July, 2017. However, since FDOT is now handling right-of-way acquisition, you may be eligible for expenses incurred as a result of relocating your business. This amount would be paid by the FDOT in addition to the funds you have already received from the County. In the near future, a representative from FDOT will be contacting you about your lease and relocation. They will provide you with additional information concerning the timing of the project. 1801270, Strect, Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3365• (772) 226-1424- Fax (772) 569-4317 ircattomey@ircgov.com P136 Timothy and Joshana Tynes February 17, 2017 Page 12 As 1 discussed with you during our meeting, I will keep you advised of events as I learn them. You have been good tenants for the County and it is always sad when a successful small business closes down. If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, William K. De,Braal Deputy County Attorney Copies to: . Richard B. Szpyrka ', P.E., Public Works Director Susan Day,District Right -of -Way Manager, FDOT P137 FORM $75-04049 RIGHTdOFWAY- 04M FD -, a .00W.-Owor- Floyida Department of Transportation RICK SWIrT 3400 West Commercial Boulevard RAOML D. 0NIE WVERNft Fort Lau4ArdAIeJL 333.09 94TERIM SECRETARIV April 19, 2017 Mermaid CarwaShinc. Timothy Types 1935 43"1 Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 Dear Mr. Tynes- In reply refer to., ITEWSEGMENT #: 4317591 MANAGING DISTRICT: Four F.A'P. * N/A STATE ROAD 60 COUNTY: Indian River PARCEL* 1102:002T Initiation of Negotiations. 4119/17 90 -DAY LETTER OF ASSURANCE As you are aware, the State of Florida Department of Transportation is in the process of acquiring right of way for the above -referenced project In your area. It has been determined. that you, your family, your business .or farm operation, or personal property you may own Will need to be relocated from this real property which is needed for the construction of this transportation1actIfty. To ensure that you receive adequate time to relocate. the Department hereby assures that you will not be required to move from the subject property before at least ninety (90) days have elapsed from the date of receipt of this letter. This assurance applies to you, your family, your business or farm operation, or personal property you may own. Further, you will:be a written notice which will specify the actual daft by. which the property must be vacated and surrendered to the Department. You will receive this latter notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the date specified. If you are a residential occupant and have not been offered a comparable replacement dwelling with this letter, you are.further assured that you will not be required to move in less.than 90 days from the date such a dwelling is made available to you. It is the sincere desire of the Department to assist you in'your relocation necessitated by this acquisition and to answer any questions you may have. Should you desire further information, our Relocation Assistance Office is located at: 3400 West Commercial Blvd Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309-34211 (954) 777-4249 Receipt Acknowledgec (1) Original to Property (2) Acknowledged Copy to District Office Official Record File Sin. rely, Day Right of Way Manager www.fdot.gov ibin Brisebois, if Date P138 EXTENSION OF LEASE AND AGREED NOTICE TO VACATE This Extension of Lease and Agreed Notice to Vacate to allow adequate time to vacate entered into on the day of May, 2017, by Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960 ("County"), and Timothy E. and Joshana Tynes, husband and wife, doing business as Mermaid Carwash, Inc. ("Tenant") whose address is 1935 43rd Avenue, Vero Beach, FL 32960. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County contracted to purchase Tenant's property on December 16, 2008. The 0.47 acre property currently contains a carwash facility that was built in 1984 consisting of a two -bay automatic carwash and 3 -self service wash bays with a covered vacuum area; and WHEREAS, the purchase of the property was in lieu of eminent domain, as the County is planning to widen and improve the 431d Avenue/State Road 60 intersection (Project); and WHEREAS, as part of the consideration for purchase of the property, the County agreed to lease back the property to Tenant. The current lease expired April 30, 2017; and WHEREAS, the County and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) have entered into an agreement whereby FDOT acquires the rights-of-way needed for the Project. Under the method of acquisition used by FDOT, the rights -of way must be "certified" as vacant, cleared and ready for road construction; and WHEREAS, the Tenant has requested an extension to the lease and FDOT and the County have no objections to granting the Tenant an extension of the lease for one hundred twenty (120) days to allow for the Tenant to look for locations to move his business, remove any equipment for the exiting site; and vacate the premises; and WHEREAS, the County will demolish the remaining improvements after the tenant vacates the property. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and promises stated herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the County and Tenant agree as follows: 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated as if fully restated herein. 2. The Paragraphs One and Two of that certain Lease dated December 16, 2008 are hereby amended to extend the lease term for one hundred twenty (120) days so that the amended termination date shall be August 31, 2017. 3. Tenant accepts this as its ninety (90) day notice to vacate the leased premises and agrees to remove all of its personal property from the leased premises by August 31, 2017. P139 4. Except as amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Final Amendment and the terms of the Lease, the terms of this Final Amendment shall control. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Lease Extension and Agreed Notice to Vacate is executed by the authorized representatives of the parties, as of the day and year first above written. MERMAID CARWASH, INC. BY: Timothy E. Tynes, Individually and as President of Mermaid Carwash, Inc. Joshana Tynes, individually and as Vice President of Mermaid Carwash, Inc. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency 41 a-, i� kov William K. DeBraal Deputy County Attorney 2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman Approved by the BCC: ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller IM Deputy Clerk of Court Jason E. Brown, County Administrator P140 10A I INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown; County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP; Community Development Director THROUGH: John W. McCoy, AICP; Chief, Current Development FROM: Ryan Sweeney; Senior Planner, Current Development DATE: May 10, 2017 SUBJECT: Robert Pritchett's Request for Abandonment of a Right -of -Way for a 16 Foot Wide Alley Running from 129th Court to 129th Street and Lying Immediately Adjacent and Contiguous to Lots 1-10, Block 18 of the Townsite Plat of Roseland Subdivision [ROWA-17-06-03 / 2017030030-788501 (Legislative) It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of May 23, 2017. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Robert Pritchett has submitted a petition to abandon a 16 foot wide alley right-of-way that runs behind Lots 1-10, Block 18 of the Townsite Plat of Roseland subdivision. Block 18 is bound by 129th Court, 81 st Avenue, 129th Street, and 81 st Court (see attachment 2). The alley has never been formally improved and is not used for primary or secondary access to any of the adjacent lots. Currently, the applicant owns Lots 1 and 2 of Block 18 of the Townsite Plat of Roseland subdivision, and those lots abut a portion of the alley right-of-way proposed for abandonment. Since the entire alley segment functions as a whole, the request involves abandoning the entire portion of the alley from 1291h Court to 120 Street (adjacent to Lots 1-10). If abandoned, the right-of-way will be joined to the adjacent private lots that lie within Block 18 of the Townsite Plat of Roseland subdivision, since the right-of-way was created by that plat and the right-of-way is entirely within the limits of the plat. If abandoned, the right-of-way will be evenly divided between the abutting lots, extending the side or rear property line (depending on lot orientation) of each of those lots by 8 feet. Prior to the Technical Review Committee (TRC) meeting at which the subject request was reviewed, Planning staff notified each property owner adjacent to both sides of the subject right-of-way by mail. One of the adjacent property owners attended the TRC meeting and indicated that they support the request. Additionally, the applicant has indicated that he has coordinated with the other adjacent property owners. To date, staff has not received any objections from any of the adjacent property owners. C:\Users\GRANIC-1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@60059FE8\@BCL@60059FE8.docx P141 The subject 16 foot wide alley right-of-way was created by the 1911 Townsite Plat of Roseland subdivision plat recorded in Saint Lucie County plat book 1, page 43. That occurred prior to creation of Indian River County. The alley right-of-way is now within the jurisdiction of Indian River County, and BCC Resolution No. 2000-150 (see attachment 3) formally accepted dedication of all streets, alleys, and easements shown on the townsite plat. At this time, the applicant requests that the subject alley right-of-way be abandoned. ANALYSIS: Consistent with guidelines established by the BCC, this petition was reviewed by all County divisions and utility providers having jurisdiction or potential interests within the subject 16 foot wide alley right-of-way. Upon review, the County Utilities Department advised that a utility easement over the entire right-of-way will be required in order to allow for possible future expansion of County water and/or sewer utilities. Therefore, the Utilities Department recommends that the entire 16 foot wide right-of-way be retained as a utility easement to accommodate possible future utility uses. All other jurisdictional agencies have reviewed and approved the proposed abandonment without conditions. While the recommended easement will preclude the location of buildings within the abandoned right-of-way area, owners of affected lots will get greater use of their lots, since the easement may be used to satisfy setback and open space requirements. Thus, the abandonment will increase the potential building envelope for all abutting lots. Subject to a condition that a utility easement be retained over the entire subject segment of right-of-way, all County divisions recommend approval of the abandonment. As noted on the County Thoroughfare Plan, the subject alley right-of-way is not part ofthe County's major roadway system and is not needed for the thoroughfare system or for traffic circulation in the surrounding neighborhood. In this case, the subject alley does not provide primary or secondary access to any property. Since each lot adjacent to the alley has adequate frontage on a local street, the abandonment will not affect the right of convenient access to any surrounding properties. Also, the County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the attached abandonment resolution for legal form and sufficiency. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners abandon its rights to the subject alley right-of-way and authorize the chairman to execute the attached abandonment resolution, with the following condition: That a public utility easement be retained over the entire area of alley right-of-way being abandoned. C:\Users\GRANIC-1 \AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyMF 7\@BCL@60059FE8\@BCL@60059FE8.docx 2 P142 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application 2. Location Map and Aerial 3. Resolution No. 2000-150 4. Abandonment Resolution CAUsersiGRANIC-11AppDatalLocallTemp\BCL TechnologiesieasyPDF 7l a BCL@60059FE81@BCL@60059FE8.docx 3 P143 1k _ AQR? D 4.3� ���'`� P�rrrloN FOR Rnw - 17 _p `O"0 3 ABANDOP11VMW of PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGH'1"F WAY, STREET, OR ALLEY Robert H Pritchett III , hereby petitions Man (Print M nine) gpn Alley behind 12930 81st cK , located in ( aney, T04 CW•) 30382100005018000001.0 . starting at (subOmon name, parcel ID#, or bad) 129th ct and termhuft at 129th St laying adjacent to (or in) Block 18 , Lot 1-2 Section_____, Townsbip Roset , as recorded in Pig Book 1 , Pap 43 , Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. Tha reasogi ft this request is (sbofiild include intmded use of property): Owner of lot behind me has Abandon ids right of way by building fence in cm ter of right of way. I would "to tog* abandon uft ftm OT W it hes no use and Is being used for other means by oOmm My Mit; is tar^ a pere®e next to a new nous® I inn buMbV so k wM be in compliance offt 20 foot set beck Applicants Name (Please print): Robert H PriitOW III Ate; Po BOX 1269 Roseland F1 32967., ' Tom; 81&777-1977 $- bpb93131.00an Date: March 3fd 2017 Iasi of prnpeaty owners abutting the portion of the road squashed to be vacated (if any): Name (Please Print): David'l�nda SeadtiN Address:- 12910 81st et Sebastian Fl 32958 TFrmtu7: Nam (Please pat): Kevan John Ashurst A,ddrm- 810012M St Sebastian F132858 Tom: &mail: Name (Pleme pth t): David G Whnne L Carvev Ams; 8105129th Ct Sebastian FI 32958 Telepla ow. &matt: Name (please Prind). Add ess: Tom: &mafu: ISM 27`Skuk V4e8adaFL32%0 g �p�mp�iktaeopm�tAPPL[cnTtt7bise. 1 Attachment 1 P144 l ' 303831IIII00�01300II008.0 ` ���`",* + f a 30382100005049600010.0 �. INZ; 31 ST CT 29I'_ 1S05EL i:Lr £rD 't 9141 129TH C'T � :-965 SL STAt `. C?ustELY,$¢Fr3RY'� I:.EITHLINE,C`HF,IS=�c�, SEf�IT_La a. JLLL� j! ;-' Hfi.'+SM. HERV EY:.t w „ �`• 303821400aE919902064.0� . A 129C9 81 ST CT Gt r' 303821000050180000II1.0 C� 303821020050 1 SWOOOO.0 fiC "CH aFC. J£FA LD F yy� 12-? D S 1 rCT 30382100005013900007.0 C A- tTTCHETi. ROBF.RTH III a '/ c Vi,3038210000'5-018000003.03038210031)!01800000fi, 30382100005502i&0003.0ti TCT fi 11tS 129TH CT �` 1295In 919T.AV SEALTIEL.DMID xr.,1LLtiDAr- e CAI('--EY- DA47DL Y $.iI Ek.DAVIELI)� 3038210II00Bg18000IIOe 0 Subject Alley ,�. _ ASHURST ICEVA : 10W. • v r. 12:7 S.1 ST C T �• 3038210000502300SJ003.0 GRAHA'.i.R6BEP.TnLLE�er4':1F1'ELIZ3BET ., 3038210,0005ft-- 0008.0 \ 30382-103MO17000000,0 i.; ti . �. ^ctb 129TH CI' HEARD. LACER L Attachment 2 T A Ln t�. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, FORMALLY ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF STREETS, ALLEYS AND EASEMENTS SHOWN ON CERTAIN PLATS WHICH PREDATE STATUTORY LAWS OF PLATTING SET OUT IN CHAPTER 177, PART 1, FLORIDA STATUTES. IN THE RECORDS OF JEFFREY K. BARTON CLERK CIRCUIT COURT INDIAN RIVER CO.. FLA. WHEREAS, laws relating to the platting of land were not enacted by the Florida Legislature until 1971; and WHEREAS, plats filed of record prior to that date sometimes had no language of express dedication of rights-of-way, streets, alleys and easements to public use; and WHEREAS. by making a sale of platted lots, the owner of a tract manifests an intent to dedicate streets and rights-of-way necessary to access those lots; and WHEREAS, common law dedication requires (1) an intention by the owner to dedicate the property for public use; and (2) an acceptance by the public; and WHEREAS, Judge Scott Kenney rendered a Final Judgment in the case Driver v_ Indian River County, in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Indian River County, Florida (Case No. 00-0343 CA19) ruling that there must be dear, satisfactory and unequivocal evidence that the public has accepted such dedications, either formally, or by the improvement, maintenance or use of said streets and rights-of-way, 1 a P146 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-150 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that all dedicated rights-of-way, streets, easements, and alleys shown on the following listed platted lands are hereby expressly and formally accepted: • Townsite Plat of Roseland, Plat Book 1, Page 43, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, now lying in Indian River County, Florida. • Plat of Wauregan, Plat Book 1, Page 178, Public Records of Brevard County, Florida, now lying in Indian River County, Florida. • Subdivisions Nos. 1 and 2, Ambersand Beach, originally platted in Brevard County at Plat Book3, Page 76, and also being recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 8-A, Public Records of Indian River County. • A. A. Berry Subdivision, recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 14 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, said lands now lying in Indian River County, Florida. The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Ginn , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Sta Or i dge, and, upon being put to � a vote, the vote was as follows: w v Chairman Fran B. Adams Aye rV Vice Chairman Caroline D. Ginn AyP Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Ayp a Commissioner John W. Tippin Ave Commissioner Ruth M. Stanbridge Aye N 2 P147 RESOLUTION NO. 2000- s so The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this 19th day of December, 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By C�lQ•K_Y6 (2&mO Fran B. Adams, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey K. Bart Clerk Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO F-CRIM AND LEGAL SUM i..s%i- `8 Y_ 3 P148 RESOLUTION 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CLOSING, ABANDONMENT, VACATION AND DISCONTINUANCE OF A 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY RUNNING FROM 129th COURT TO 129th STREET AND LYING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO LOTS 1-10, BLOCK 18 OF THE TOWNSITE PLAT OF ROSELAND SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, SAID LAND NOW LYING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA; SAID ABANDONMENT SUBJECT TO RETAINING A UTILITY EASEMENT. WHEREAS, on March 3, 2017, Indian River County received a duly executed and documented petition from Robert H. Pritchett III requesting that the County close, vacate, abandon, discontinue, renounce, and disclaim any right, title, and interest of the County and the public in and to a 16 foot wide alley right-of-way running from 129th Court to 129th Street and lying immediately adjacent and contiguous Lots 1-10, Block 18 of the Townsite Plat of Roseland subdivision as shown in Plat Book 1, Page 43, of the Public Records of Saint Lucie County, Florida, said lands now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Florida Statutes 336.10, notice of a public hearing to consider said petition was duly published; and WHEREAS, after consideration of the petition, supporting documents, staff investigation and report, and testimony of all those interested and present, the Board finds that the subject right-of-way is not a state or federal highway, not located within any municipality, not necessary for continuity of the County's street and thoroughfare network, and does not provide exclusive access to any private property; and WHEREAS, the Board finds that a utility easement needs to be retained over the entire right- of-way to accommodate possible future utility uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 1. All right, title and interest of the County and the public in and to that certain right-of-way segment more particularly described as follows: ALL OF THE 16.00 FEET WIDE ALLEY, LYING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, OF BLOCK 18 OF THE PLAT OF "TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING: 4,800.00 S.F. MORE OR LESS. Attachment 4 P149 RESOLUTION 2017 - Lying and being in Indian River County, Florida, is hereby forever closed, abandoned, renounced, disclaimed, and vacated except that a utility easement shall be retained over the entire area of the subject abandonment. (see Exhibit A attached) 2. The closing, vacation, and abandonment of these portions of public alley right-of-way is in the best interests of the public. 3. Notice of the adoption of this resolution shall be forthwith published once within thirty (30) days from the date of adoption hereof. 4. The Clerk is hereby directed to record this resolution together with the proofs of publication required by Florida Statutes 336.10 in the Official Record Books of Indian River County without undue delay. The alleyway shall revert equally to properties on both sides of the subject alley right-of-way within the Block 18 of the Townsite Plat of Roseland subdivision. The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner , and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Bob Solari The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and adopted this day of .2017. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA LAM Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller Deputy Clerk 2 Attachment 4 P150 RESOLUTION 2017- I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, and officer duly authorized in this State and County to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , and as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and Deputy Clerk, respectively, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and they acknowledged before me that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of , 2017. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY • Dylan Reingold, County Attorney APPROVED AS TO PLANNING MATTERS IM Stan Boling, AICP, Director Community Development Department Notary Public Attachment 4 P151 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF ALLEY ABANDONMENT: ALL OF THE 16.00 FEET WIDE ALLEY, LYING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4; 5, 6, 7, B, 9 AND 10, OF BLOCK 18 OF THE PLAT OF "TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID LAND NOW LYING AND BEING IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING: 4,800.00 S.F. MORE OR LESS. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: L UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, THIS DRAWING, SKETCH, PLAT OR MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. 2, NO SEARCH WAS MADE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS BY THIS FIRM OR SURVEYOR FOR RIGHTS—OF—WAY, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORDS. THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS BASED ON A PREVIOUS BOUNDARY SURVEY PERFORMED BY CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC., PROJECT NO. 17-2545, DRAWING NO. 20471-8. P N w 3. ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, FOUNDATIONS AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WERE NOT OBSERVED OR RECORDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED FOR THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION. o 4. THIS MAP IS A SKETCH AND DESCRIP77ON ONLY. A BOUNDARY SURVEY WAS NOT PERFORMED TO j DELINEATE SAID BOUNDARY LIMITS OF THE PORTION OF DESCRIBED ABANDONMENT. N uj 6. THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS COMPRISED OF 2 PAGES. ONE IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE OTHER. a w I, 0 aC3 �z LEGEND w m oa W WEST t In E EAST Tn S SOUTH to 0 N NORTH 1f. Ft O (0) OBSERVED DATA n a. (P) PLAT DATA (C) CALCULATED DATA CERTIFIED TO: Cor"......�ae�j, N'o'; R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY CC' '+ N P.B. PG. PLAT BOOK, PAGE ROBERT H. PRITCHETT III utiE r7> DAVID G. AND WYNNE LGARVEY'• ; v S.L.CO., FL ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA t til w KEVAN JOHN ASHURST DAVID AND LINDA SEALIIEL '. r , o I 4� m N • c S S THIS MAP IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY '"" CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC• :CONSULTING ENGRfKM AND LAND SURVEYORS 1708 21st STREET, VERO BEACH, FL 32960 TEL: (772) 562-4191 FAX: (re) 562-7180 Attachment 4 1 P152 FRAN4 S. CUCCURESE;`FL.I PSM, •4765 ` C.A.I. B. 205 SIGNATURE DATE: / DATE :APRIL! -1 T PAOJ 6 :11.2513 PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OF ALLEY � 2 Ll DRAW BY: W AM f' � FSO PART OF BLOCK 18 OF "TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND" SUBDIVISION PLOT BY : F-Admx.,o REF./ INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA ,XN718176/3 FB.APG;_ SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION .. Attachment 4 1 P152 .4 m FL m 132.00' (P) —129th COURT R.O.W. 16.0, zLco S 44'47'55" E Q 1-3200' (P;— b 'o LOT 10 LOT 1 q q BLOCK 18 S.L.CO., FL. BLOCK 18 to to 0 (D 132.00' (P) 132.00- (P) ci ci N N o PROPOSED ABANDONMENT a w �t 0 OF ALLEY BLOCK 18 9 LOT 2 0 6 LOT 8 09 L of BLOCK 18 in in n n . 0 10 BLOCK 18 BOCK 18 n Lo 14- It 13zoo. (p) "TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND" W- 132.OV (P) —P.B. 1. PG 43, L LOT 5 OT 6 BLOCK 18 BLOCK 18 Lo oci 0 to Lo 132.00` (P) 132.00- (P) 16.0' 11 4 N N 44'47'55" W J. 129th STREET 50' R.O.W. co W V) CL THIS MAP IS NOT A 0 20 40 BOUNDARY SURVEY SCALE (I Inch = 40 w CARTM ASSOCIATES,INC. OPTSPROJ,# nasrs 11PIL4,2MI PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OF ALLEY SHEET 18 OF coNsumir. ENCwms AND LAND suRmoRs "' " PART OF BLOCK TOVMSITE OF ROSELAND"" 2 OF 2 1708 21St STREET, VERO BEACH, FL 32960k - TEL (772) 682-4191 FAX: (772) 5W-7180 FtEFl* INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA FAM SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION A P153 132.00' (P) S.L.CO., FL. 0 0 ci ci N N o LOT 3 a w �t a BLOCK 18 9 io w " C14 P, LOT 8 09 w 0 (o in in n n . 0 10 BLOCK 18 0 to n Lo 14- It 13zoo. (p) —Z W- 132.OV (P) "TOWNSITE OF ROSELAND" P.B. 1, PG 43, LOT 7 0 S.L.CO,, FL. BLOCK 18 c� LOT 4 w to BLOCK 18 132.00' (P)T3-27oo'—(PTIQ l L LOT 5 OT 6 BLOCK 18 BLOCK 18 Lo oci 0 to Lo 132.00` (P) 132.00- (P) 16.0' 11 4 N N 44'47'55" W J. 129th STREET 50' R.O.W. co W V) CL THIS MAP IS NOT A 0 20 40 BOUNDARY SURVEY SCALE (I Inch = 40 w CARTM ASSOCIATES,INC. OPTSPROJ,# nasrs 11PIL4,2MI PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OF ALLEY SHEET 18 OF coNsumir. ENCwms AND LAND suRmoRs "' " PART OF BLOCK TOVMSITE OF ROSELAND"" 2 OF 2 1708 21St STREET, VERO BEACH, FL 32960k - TEL (772) 682-4191 FAX: (772) 5W-7180 FtEFl* INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA FAM SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION A P153 Treasure Coast Newspapers I 'TCPALI��`Q Indian River Press Journal 1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL M60 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, Jane Mclimurray, who on oath says that she N Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement"was published in the Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and, that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Fiorlda, fora period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisetnent; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach; Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Customer Ad Number Copyline PO # 463755 - INDIAN RIVER CO PILANNING DEPT 1597616 Hearing:.5/23/17: Roseland Subdivision Hearing: 5/23/17 Pub Dates May 3, 2017 sp orh td and subscribed before mee�this'day of, May 05,.2017, by r y �ti!%` who is Jane M-11 Jane (X) personally, known to me or ( ) who hak p bduced _ as identification. t JoyceWeih // J / Notary Pub[* U;,.•iKrs&; 1. •<• �. •- LINDA JOYCEKL[IN, Notary Public- State ofFloridit CommissionJIG6691422 My Comm. Expires HI 4, 2021 Bonded ttuwykhaii"t•4dafy&, 10 ,t 153-)P\- I Dea[um Coast NAwspapers Mo^diy, May 42017 SC 153.1 -2- IN21AfC L7R r2puca"6MEMUNp Ddxp� a!, NON SEQUITUR Itles Who need en Acta.. R df Krawi decides to • The Drobttdirgs of Me Local Plannln0 A9¢naY/Planning GyI.h M Order m DaMo- in this prx<edinp Are Aped any, decision' made wttA r<spett t0 anY maNer A.%.' AUM SENXOTT, OeDdl tlOrk ♦+ And Zoldnp eammnziDn ° a 1 hvnical rd- !pale mdi0d, M M east, m tM UVroro Islon M carnia oasis- coornddered M 14 s he°rirgs pf eM board gerkdthe Cidu tCourt, 11 Well 11".1 CL QVUNSUANT TD SECTION 'Inde. This does not lndude Itae, -AIfca ,munell NR: ARM V. 2; Mny 1. B, MMT d 286A105. FLORIDA• STAT• RTES, X a detldes m trans rN[bn t0 nntl from Me R0 trop. %ease or aEdspry group that , con wit nCeO n rccOrd 01 fAe TCN PAIN Q pe qPeed arrydetmi0n made by con- t ttlK Otf of the Co�ntY Pro«ldings °M, fw auto' e.lmay needm ensure tsi ' tpryIe Ldcd %!nolo �gApentY/ abnpMI A7Mnistramt at (gJTU llf- SE No^t le SuL tthh° nyi stamad; NTAXpEEp APPUG ON FDq - j' C m rrp�R t0 vY tter d0nsderetl ntamsM- ey Rol°d, R3e996. R01atu MNlM_ p°OnKO Mei -d •� Inv or lxNdrgh'.wlhe Me eg recant M Medate. dter do h.fore MO meeUnp� Ihls nMincatlpn an . I SM blIlimon1 dpvMena poo which ire eppeni m G, TO. peed Flm Xo_1fi-240 `A t _ J tswsthad.h° �r MuchhMemare ba Il° an guest FahrtherirtfprmatioMBDeI¢asn NCAELTNCYIAERIAEIX FUNDING wWh Me �a�rtm<M it T123865s99, iELLthe hdduof thefpllvw - ai O'cheedirgs k made. recordIncludes the tea• ADR°A Cmrpol"To,.1(1/,� It, 111-1396. PersOM u 1 a' All Writmn AmmwtS should ca nfKam has fdcd said a (� tlmopy and avmma upOd TOO device, pkale call ill- be sent m Nidi van Vwm, Le rtiflcU_ car a tax dead m M BwM IM1mkoG 1 �9 0 which the goad m le M ased. Upon tM request M Florida Retry SCrWtea When attentlng a Mf near•. __ Mal�ev int Direc• tai, (¢-mall: NkkN® rd°. nnam numMr ane Year M issuance, Me description .A.a QI 0sry Darty t0 U! pr0«elNp, inp. a mem0¢r OP the public MuS) Or N01 6E MOMerepy R! E. Q ` E.m, Y 1 a• IF IduaYs Itst yhg du ng headnp Wil be swum II, may speak dWino Ne public o tP-Mash. PUD' �S Sia m w1Y be n n1F ,� """"'"1S° cg°udm� r�S�DmeaBdf�p dMl Ids ,�drlyWtNPetne pyla IromprMpa crRwtn Mvr c U 1 iillyy IndWid I tesNfYlnv dude n pub! 1 , ask 00ee�� qquU TMIS NOTICE bA DTXI52ND DAY OF MAY 2017, Cernflte left _o' f lssuantc x431 A, dress:. _ Li N hearing upon request. if R becomes mce35ary,A r. may OC wntinY L0 = of Ore s[yN, °DDgo d viva tesOmony A'the headn&' 'e; Me 11Vi TCN 159 m REOx'000 DR C Y Pmp°dyD 066 DIC D pppRppgpry peeOAS 7 eaafF dam xercaln. ubleM eltM pUblk N ortler la M M Inlerve-' m�ilkplueali/y to IFDAL MITI' The LOT 5147 HOLIDAY PINES, PHASE IIIMC.A, ACCORDING NOTICE OF APPUCATON FOR NOTICE OF A.C.M. MR The title Mxic paragon I.EvarceEwPfhlkS¢ctbn hafts. FIN., CmntY NOR, nat1:00 TO THE PLAT THEREOf, TAX DEED, TAX.Em ORDINANCE 0:Maty115, R.R.Regla- 3011 PM. TMg0UGf119G. Ofi XEPU4p Tax Dved File Xo:36�299 Thx DeedfM Np.:163s6 G. AN WOMAN "AFFECT. IN0'TNE USE Of LAND IN Land CeMopmno btM (Hsttkl OlRpeCmter- UC RECORDS OF ST. WCIE, NOTCEISHEMBYGIVEN, Met ,NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that (Q Q sL ST. VIRE COUNTY- fLORI- !Loma Martin Guntytp .ln wfifm, an Intuwnm Must nc Room.]T10Tih Termc°: Suit* 204-8, Yap Beach, FL COUNTY, FLORIDA Pares Io-. x3x3301-Ot0i-MO/5 gAIENDRA INC Me voider Ot Ma IOnpMIg cMln«ie has EVANSE WILSON Nt tloMer f tM follemMp eertrOcaa- Q D0. 'ELATINO TO A RPORT_ rib a fu m M Intent w M the Addays 32960. Any Names) In Whkh Assessed: fed add certincates foY A W9 fil<0 501-1 <MiliCatIs d C �♦ Z UtATONs BYOAM NE DING 6EC'FON LOOM MEFI` lepss tt 7aotprdndee BOZO me�eytmnp. Np fes MR tlnOGss mopy, bendlmcSeE is<IgCMD olfkes at 172-71,0- Sa10 proOMy°Oe,1. 1n the SL Lude. Sl�ant�° aL TM cefi«�°manumber IrcrKmnsd Ttdie°ttHlincete V UPORT OVERLAY the 1,te-or I. if °i of dad year pt ISsuan o«p, lnle bratry�end, year Of Issp;. d The ZONES). H P•P ECT NSEC110f11 mr«islfdp -lmi-sant, I., 0 S srespect Obla°ny0. ttcr pCounty uta edea epedY a4 e31p0 °owClt the n wh �Alo °wa°fa lSspss°0 vo, .. 1.00.02 (AIRPDM s, Ciel lettemeetl signed by an discussed at the Dlic Ow- D deESOdDed 'in aIM c¢riN1 to shall be eadtfi«t° Np_ 2p09/i38a y (AIRPORT BECTON 100.01 (AIRPORT NONE XEGRx UMITATONSI' MOdiM rlDre«n,A,vG Ot MC up/a55K1atlOn, stet °.t l Wn dadd meeting VIA SNR need n 1%. ddmN<Mytwd blOdm by Ntptrmk,aM! d May, Year OelsSuance: 2D DR Cadlfltite N0.' 1031/.MI5 -�, AND SECTION 1.00.01 NSE vtPri heAha is eWhmhed Will r I practtdinps, anal I0r wd 0l 1o1T M Mtps:Vrtlutle.cler- Add,, 150{533RD ST, FORT %ERCE Vc. W kwon.: 2031 Address: RESTRICTIOX51 IN ALCOR• DANCE Y.mx CHAPTER 333. speak lw Me9rou0.Forms m•°iaMe On Ne Marna vrpo ,M wshe may need P* Msure' "" a verbatim kauttlOnpm at 11:00 q.M. RxMO proKrty Oescrlptlan: 2050 CLEANSER AVE 301„ C F10MDA'STAMES R0t6h County webske www.mar- c rd of Ne DroseeObmm _ THERE AAE UNPAID TAPESOON LOT 35, LEGS THEWEST5 FELT HEREOF, BLOCK C. i0RT p1EALE ProKrtY O<scriDNm; O PROWDING FOR CONFLICT• LNG- PROVISIONS, SEVER- do.O.Us. II Y perfOn Ottitle[ l0- dl, wAid recOM (I, cies Me mztimony and evidence PROPERTYWHICX TOU OWN OR IN WHICH YOU HAVE A PALMETTO PARK ACCORD• IND TO THE PLAI.TXEPEOf. PARTNEM N0. 2M,BNIA LNG X ISLAND NORSE CON- N ABILITY AND APPIICABIUTY. apped'anY tletlslon made" Gon wnicn Cha °OKNis tp be LEGAL iNTFREST. THE PROP• A90.ECOADEDIXttA7800K ppNiNiVM PHASE ID.pCO!} 1 PROVIDING FOR EALING VFRH OEpgRTMENT OF STATE: M rlSpeel to any mMar considered'9 the ceding, bastd- Pok Nay 8.2017 ERTY WILL BE SOLD AT PUB- UC AUCTION ONASr2L2017 1, AT PAGE M. OF THE PUB. IMAGING GOMIN111N, ACCORDING TO' IM PROVIDING FOR ADO" or awl.vs 0l any board TCN 158ISM UNLESS THE BACK TAXES UC RECORDS OF ST.' WCIE MUM ,,FLORIM., THEOECLA- T AS M LADEO M oIFlRAt tQ AND CODIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE MtE• cp Nteq apancy coon ar advisory p ihaz pC - - DRE PAID: TO MAKE PAY- MENTI OR TO RECEIVE MR- par« I'D:3117305-0016-000/1 Nam(s) M Which AsSesSed: RECORDS BOOK 501 AT PAGE 1948 (475 AMENDED}.OFTNE O a - San"" ° "'d M< Sys- THEA INiOpMATON, COX- IppAM PETEASEN PUBLIC RECORDS OF. ST, (_n fl- myqulri Wltnnin ddan nity asp meetuq Procaedlsgs and: fm suds Pur se, entry need t0 ¢nfur< pEpREST FOR MD (Ri612037-2963 TACT TXE CLERK OF fAURT IMMEgATELY AT 2300 WR- Snd properly bdnp In the Gamty °t SL Lome 'in LUgE COUNTY, FtAMOA. Nmtl10:3a15-ill-OptO.00D/fi' V 0 •� attend Nis chOuM Mia lM M. at e(bumy least fm- DaP rbaMn record ole the Ne yyrocord1I1F9S Is made, Marna County aoertl al WNIA AV; 1Np FLOOR. FOgT %ERCE. iL 34092: ,InT1-163- amide UMesa sdd.certNlcaa Nall m0(s) NWhich Assessed:' ISLAND HOUSE OWNERS s� (� Rise Menapw'at tt�t epht (18) noms Ddm m r¢pOM should Include the teRi M arMeme COWL,, Cammlznonen Pu lcxxlnp Ohlda. 692&, %Dperty y' b¢ rndlCmed MFOuph the SL M «deemed at<erdingg m IAw the da5h16 d 459N INC-. Sak bellg in Ne, i Q2 :% y Me eetlrg-1(772)163 516 ()71)162-INe.' pen wM a0p¢i11[ m b<haud 31016.E Mont! <y Road W k County Tax COP! m w Q n wcn [enK! a! sh°I pC prop9rtY CRun pf 5L Wde, $late °I, Q Q LOC IPIANMNb AGENCY% FmfwNerMlmmetbh. pledse MI11 Gr°wMManaglmant stuar4Haida31996 (yyy( 38ff-5181 -Porruhmptan°mmma°M nucUpn please conm<t iho Id tp the Menest bidden by pnIC uk 32nD of Nay. FIOrMa. UW- skid cu ift., Shall. PLANNING ANDZONING 0lpertme'cMT72-1A8-5195 EmaB �pm pi ODma l^Ars ax C�kctm, T7316z- 1650.. 2o3i at n Pa [ ude.d¢P puctlar-wen °t 11:004M. bored°eyed accord rip m the dead COMMISSION, All written cammMtssMMd yNyNyf. pr(Ieg.uS =a this 23nd day Of FebrU- WARNING' pprroopp rry D¢d ,�n sunt cernlit6te cNdl M ST. 11NgECDUNTY WIl11AM0'DELL ltNA1RMAN Mcent to Mckl van Won; GrowN Managgeemmeennt Obea Tne &card Of County Comb ary.301T. THERE ARE UNPAID TAXES ON :old m the hkAesl bi0der by Wb: May 0, 30V' Lor, (( It nh 2101 IsSbnors, Marlin wunty Flodtl;; wBl receaa [Kieti AUCEV.SENNOTT, "I""' PROPERTY WXICHYOUOWN OR IN WHICH YOU HAVE A Iectrodeve22nd W"May. 2017 M Attps:/Atlu[IadCr TCN 160{015 iUeUC NpTLE RuH) SE Mo°fer14 iw Mebl ,,: Dip:ren:, q<n: ILLUIp,Lftu ll CpuFt. LFEAL INTEREST ME PROP, CITY UCTIONEOS2005%R kauction,cOmnt11A04M. Orced,Lt CUSTOMS FACILITY Fu 24' May 1.8,2017 .IT H BACK TAXES THERE ARE UNPAID TAXES ON PROPERTY EIOM Hirt spyHl IM, I010np7�Y M peapEEmllthe1VeI,hee TNDj6 fNOTjCE DATED TRIS IIrp� kded Mes will be re[eivtd CX 1509719 ARE Pu0 TO GAY OR HAVE A. PhYd *n CrwP°Patient IUYOFWYM17. host lIn-11 fomwo, Desk an TUR MEW..OR TORECEIVEFAN- MR, Fi1TYWLL8ET. AT PUP-, ILL B S w01 DC mMMniMd TPY[Dtr� 15932 011 nom unto V20 PM local TACT THE QERK OF COURT UC AV 05/2T (� e<COeds t Ieate SE iMwd Pr way, HOM Sourd. FL 23!55, then On WedresdaY.Pen!]s. 2017 NOTICE OFAPPLICATION MR TAXDEED IMMEDIATELY AT -I VIAL- GINR AVE MND FLOOR, FORT UNLLSS T BACK TAKES ARE PAIR TO MAKE PAY- N alephone f772) a 943. BFFORETHE BOARD BF The basic bid dowmeM h �aWTTevvO0°��t Ww .m°rtim Tax Deed File N0.:16 -3{t %ERCE FL N893, 71N62- M28- Pthto HENT, DA TO RECEIVE FUR - THEROOT INFORMATION, COM- (Q mclaGi re°YGmr4ttraKilsafelir¢E choice MARTIN COUMY.fLORWA' Seat'd fie(dtMn�Ods on80 NOTICEIS HEREBY GNEN, Thal yy Rn Elle SL Wde County MNEOIATElC1YEp0.T.Q3WYIA� X et M charge wXn a 219^ed NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING k� TM of document CAZE11(1OWq q(EEK FUNDINO Tax CdNetoa fv rcdem0- tion ammnts h3atruc• g N%AVE,2HDFLOO& MAT %FACE, fi 3189E T7iafi2- rO 0 avflmdec but SNbjeen Reprrest for evkrE amplele maY dad from hold INef°Ipw- ILC GW ire and 'Iona, Tax 6936. miy be :A Q V Q Pub: AyA ta, MIIY 4415.2011 TCN 1531118 dna py Rsque Wolm<r ant Slag Vtdme! m reduce Ne ,Eemin05tu. Martin County is"m e -I l�caa�2Wremxllad be Issued theame, The car, IMDhb Cdlec or. TI1J61.1650, 1 Dna this Mh dM °f Febmary. PUt," ty allIf throu➢tl the 6t Wde CO 1 Ir {(� tbad, r gUlremenis. of artkm W9- NY!afn^^aUVe CUnDOnnB oyer. tlnmte numbu and veer at 20V, Tax Copeemr, Fm ddemp• llOn'amDUMf entl InsUut- Z 9.� Z CNdttcae 3, Zoning Riddle," Lard Development Regia- BY mOUMrhe Board of Iscuence, the desvktlon M Me Arm !rtY. and the admen IICESENNOTT, tiw,�Iease cmtaM the Tax NOTCEOFAUBtIC HEARING tlom Martin County Coda tMirYNO Count31 FI0ddA. MchXwas afz<ssed v< D<PIM Gerk mi-EEL, Clerk Mtb°Clrtdt Court. COlkct°r. n2.162-1650. Date Mh ICM 0aY Of AAd. L• ui Notice It a pubile. hearitgt. he for tbe.HR-1, gaol!-IamAY IT eeMld Ohtrkt to permit ca utrt.. °t ° w m 1 517 431 CeAff cad Ne: 2014/476 Isukq MCl1, ]*1. May 1.8.3017 201T- Mer a peNOn for y021np^nb°ntlenmen4 and m¢ I'kUu.I.dAatbnddH,. fh[ bNct 1st bcac<d Year of lssucare 3011 Addresv ypq IP05980 MARGARETNAHA. Op qAM, r C ib Ala dont-d-waYfor 16 foot wide aRK of [85185E Marprove Sheet Verde, _ tSXOeM AppRwt 1106 DONALD AVE 641M UJOECOUXTY. OTiGE OFA TAX DEED auk Mthe Clcult Court. SL Lucia CowR '� from 129M Court m M,R SirN M yl��rp9 Mnwdlate- Hobe Sound, NOTICE OF APPLICATION IDA `950 Pr�VVedy OesmloX - pub:�1pdI V.2�Mry 1.42 3) TCM 1670D99 Z Qi IF adSaceM orad mMlpuws Leod DescdptlOrc LM63, TREASCDVE xwrdinY TAX DEED: lOT T BLOCK 3. SINpON'I, SLIMYISION, ACCORDING TaxDKtl FTe No, 16352 �- m Iv1s I.,. Blink se M MR on. 1-1 )Mck Rosderd '=flab! To Me Al'.' Me:¢anrccOrdt9 TOx Dawe FB¢N0.16-139 TO THE PLAT THEREOKAS NOTCCISHEREBYGIVFJI,Md NOTICE OF (ON FOR. A Pubec Mar- 1A Pmt Bmk S. & M, tM PUMk Rlcmds 0/Martin NOTCELSNENEBYGIVEN, Nat RECORDED IN RAT BOOB, 30 AT PAGE"'IIEPUB- ST W pLTX PnRTN[RS LP fire nok rot Ne logOwinp T� I- Q �,atwhids parries in inter t anticilMmzh JI have An County Florida- CAZENDWA CNEEII NNOMO UO RECORDS OF ST LUCIE Nllate nas(Red said car TaxOredfik E i DCorhmltym be heard,wN T end pont, T.pp P.M. pr ILLCtM AdtlOr oltMfvllow= irgcertllicate has fled wdd COUNTT FLORw4TOGETH- ER WRN ALL THAT PART Of [Mutes lM a tax dead TO M Is sued The,— The ce, NOTICE IS MR VE that Z 4% be If I e.d.fCaun• ryry CmnmissioKrs of Indian 5 Smn al3u n[ Ne molter. y be heard, 0n Thursday rlincatez fm° tax deed io M issued thereon. The ter- 33 FOOT PARCEL OF LAND DESIGNATED AS'SOU7NFAN txkam number ant yyCear 01 Mrvana, Me tlesMlpflen Of ST WEALTH PAPTNERS' LP theholder01 the t01i0wkp (n /�� Rlrer County, eadd In Me County Cpmmlulon CMSN MAY 35.3017 tlnmfenumDer And year of a [M asdpd l Of BELL TELEPHONE CO. EASE- Ni' AS SHOWN ON PLAT the pproropperty, and M°namn rondo nn3 oma :da «r - Ciliates far tax dead t0 Q C V / U bmi Of Ne CopalY AOminio- honor BuOdn, Ixead at %°a: Martin County Hey ppaerty. and ase names OF STNDON'S S000NISION, whlth n suds a5[es3ed in ns mllowi:' .a be issued thereon. Tho cK- Im12TMSheeP.VwoBeAck yy jpljtPnwxltwM ed a'. 0"ACIMiEL5 IOFITIEBPUB ","A" be Jeeglpmnon o� Flpdd; en Tsefdsy, May B. 21�]SEMpr°tlitMCyE StuaR, il0dds RECORDS � RECORDS Cf ST. LUCIE Certlii«[e N0.:2011/353 V¢arof lsslmneu 2011 misucaalarce M M° G rtY. end Ma names. TAt wA0 y wish tp pOeM esu 0<drsbn: wnkA AD laterestld Persons C¢rtificde NO. 201VI66 Year It lssul c 2014 COUMT Fl0A1D0. WNICN UE6EASTEALYDMOMMIA• AtlOress: 0 SOUTHWWD IAL SAMT In wKItR It suns massetl Fad- aafMowS Onay made at Mm meet- vlee m' Attend d be- beard. Adtlress:- 1724 NAVAJO AVE• SLC CENTTO LOT 7,INBLOCN,OF SAID SINDON'SSUBDWISION. WCIE COUMY ..MR b&r�e aNmmF.r. that d�t veMMtigm� aem0MMe PmvnI. dlsaMl- gyps ymp read an a«em• Proy<r(yOesedOtbn: ParoNIDd42S10]-0OV 7 pmOeM pescdPHon: THES MH I n OF THE SW Ced oCale Nu,: i031/]SS 1(sauss, :-204 A�Er°55. �z m°dalbnm rd to portio- iNESOUTHi FEETOFIAT Name(511nWnykD Asse Sad: UI Oi THE NW I/I Of THE AW IA of PIN EpISOAIM LlIC1E tM mtNhony * c, kit tM ePMMeid°. ant NE°ANACCOb`RIDINGATO THE SComtY a nRANGEAO EAST O� nORad W@ b¢ Wad aRecceadlto : ThIs does not include FLAT THEREOF. AS RECORD- tLW<y5tatelb FlOdde" LUCIE COUNTY, fLDPm0. pe THE NORTH IR -jTU NW INDIAXRIVEF COUNTY transportntlOnmarO tram 0 I PIAT BOON S.AT PAGE Unless mM'terNtieet<syyhatl, LESS TxE WESimFEET. VI OF THE NW' 114 OF THE BOARD OFLOVMY COMMISSION LRS the tlsTt°Ie OifPed of ide County ppmlntstrster, 1ST LUCIECWHPY,flORl- be rh°med DropMY de5vlbed IA sod be NmaK°ilel(sli {Wldclh A°03"/0 ME SECTION 18 TOWNME SNIInP-OJa Br. SpsaphEFleSCAv' �Mrman at (TT2) 221- )160. <r In wdnnpo to 2401 DA Par«110:1420-ME30966.000/3 cartlficate shall ddmvb myynest bMdu Oy Aectronk ANGELA NMRLLI.a Sent property being In Cho SOUTH, RANGE Ip EAST ST. WCIE COUNTY FLOgIpAA,, PUO: NeYy 6.20IT SE Monarev RKtl. Smart, FL11996, Minto Neme(s) In Which Assessed". DANIEL COZINE sale 32nd of May, "IT V MtpaJ/stlp e.dv- County Of SL Lode. Slate 01 pprld°., LEGS THE NORtII 30 fEEl THEREOF AND THE w6sT 60 THEREOFA D TRI ]597616 days b¢ 0 IM Ono -On., Said property Ddnp In M! Co..' M 6ElUd°•St°I°M kaYCtlOn.e0m at1 roam. WARNING U=Raul C¢rtiRcaa sA011 BEFORE THF BOARD OF ZONING ADIUSTMEM dale. Tn(s Mific.H.. pan W r<Drodueed b an altar• Flodde THCRE AqE IINPAm TAKES DN M redeemed accordlne to law the property desenDed PARCEL ID; . 111&L2-0DIS-000/5 MAR TIN GOIMTY. FLORIDA rsdive format apo quest. by -eceth int Off Of Unless ado «rttlkale 1AAII be redeemed acmMM m PROPERTY WHICNytV OWN OR IN SUNK. YOU HAVE A TO such tertlNtme sha0 M old cath! hipMN D. at by Nnme(s)In Which Assessem PAUIINECUMMINGS NOTICEOF FUBIIO NEARIXO IM ADA CmrQnaWt(772) law the gto Iy ed d D M IEWLINTEREST.tNE PpOP ERTY WILL BE SOLD AT DUB- Neelronie s°IO 13M a1 Mny Sale Propertyhen In In the wbLect RCOUpst rprFFar�aapWpnnr: 321-1396. Peron a in TDD devim,YY ps!ase 0ali 711 cutdicaM eplEm Me D'gheSt hMdu by UC AUCTION ON OSN/2011 2011 ¢t Mtpsy/stmde.der hauffe mat 1,,M Cwn1Y M SL lucl0. Slate 01 t%a_ tlev LLAt byC. Ee VirylMe AmstM WNerdan Near, 2M7ba°htl pJh ntlpdol<.cleY UNLESS PE GAIO NTOB MAKE VAEYS- ARE Unless he edLmeme0 eeepiam2yihDedNl attmalnO alWlle 10YCbwWAXMIHGI1O AM, RECEIVE THERE UNnaIU TAXES ON RWHICN I. Ne seabed �rtleenta OJ My SKgk OYdrg 11K WpllF nr WERE ARE THEE INFORAiIATlION GRIN YOU /NAIVE 4 E. E -VAT N [Y<M1 Cerllipld, inM be to Q La�ri6 plr2loyne�ItgRrtedpcls- CYap LIC �pcapp nWy in Ne YY0aa11EONN OR IN WHICH YOU HAVE A IMMMEDIATELYY AT 2300 VIN. GINIAAVE2NDflO0R FORT GATT WILLBE 50Lp PUB• tledrothkCSaI¢h220 oI MaY. tionss,, arta Cpeeu��nnnly also perfldpnte public' an lY EEGALWill RE RT OE'. fl SIn9; Tri -162- UC AUCTION ON 06/22/3017 UNLESS THE BALK TA% ES 2M] M httpsJ/SWdl keuptl0n.tom dl 1.00 A.M. _ N U¢v¢opmetDishlthdesl b� I t rvmor uk°ques�, staff• SOLO N& 69M �y' ARE PA 10. TO MAKE PAY• - - WAPNING IlsheO for tae Sa1Ifldl gala[ PUD mmnlroac to ppee Goof M Me volicent M Alva testlmvny on tlM UC AUCTION ON o5/21R017 UNLESS THE BACK TAXES erty be red.- Prof h Nroup Cha SL LudeCmMy MEM• OR TO RECEIVE NR- THEA INFORMATION; CON- THERE ARE UNPAID TAXES ON PROPERTYAUUNP MYOU OWN - . MyU.2 adlmenb lnt0 SIO! anrcidrorear Yob set- Mj<cl pito<pubik Muk9. In oAer m M an Inmrve- ARE PAID„1b MAKE PAY: MEM. DR TO RECEIVE FUR-' Tax CdIKmt. Fat m0emp- Von arbounts and IMWc- TACT THE CLEAN OF COUIIT IMMEDIATELY AT 23N VIR- OR IN WHICH YOU HAVE q LEGAL INTEREST. LIN PRDP• O bACks by Ne.sirglpe ittamUy, 1 dwdtln tM ROi,aplr50n must qualify le` Iva mailed MUa vF the THER PIT ON CON. TACT THE CLERX OF COURT qww, Nee contactthp Tex. CdkcW T3-162-1650. "A AVE It FLOOR,FOAT PIER I. FL 11892, Tf3-A62• ERTYWILL 6ESOLDATINI UC AUCTION DN 06/22!20!7 rm1 SE ieM lot tt 6719 SouM Modm Way Start noede fv*jeCt apoolIl tbn In accOr dmie Section 10.&E, IMMEDIATELY AT 3300 WR- SHIA AVE END FLOOR, FORT pato MN:lAdayM February, 3DIT 6926: UNLESS THE BALK TAXES L¢gdDeicdptbrd Afull lOpd an LAnd DevebpmeM peyum- In %ERCE, FL-I1d9t, 1)3.163• M.. AUCF SENNOTT, Propert>> y M redeemed Mroup11 Cha 4. Luck County ARE PAID, TO MARC PAY- MENTI OR TO RECEIVE NR- e¢scrlVUOn LS m(IaOk lrom tipm N°rGn Gopany. tlditi0n, en lydlrv¢nOr Out, pr00<rly, y M redeemed pepiny Rmlt- 'b C ec w. Fm rCdemp- no^ emo.t. end I�rshpc: i/1ER INFORMATION, MN*, TACTHE CLEAROi COURT ,i�Y _ Ne Nartln Caumy GrOwln ManapemeMOwartmenL ImA orm pf mteM suint Me throuih Lha Sl.lWetwMy Tex edlEstOr. Far perk Of Me tlrcuil Court, ILLuck CpuMyy Nam. Mad Me lhx ° TR TMMEOIATEL7 AT 1300WR- County AtlministratOr M less Man iddaays Ppri IO Mei redemp. Mw a mounts ant inshua- tbm, Tai Pub: AMIM24, Mmyl.8.2011 TCN Cd -a62-1650. Oale[hls d day of Apll,ED37. .RMLA 2ND ROOR,FORT PIERCE; fL 31893, TTMIT 'r a' Thne and Wtc 7.00 p.M:, or after az lM matter' T�1 Ee heard, on Thursday. 102A m=,,. Mn fee will• be swim fift-har.11' theinhrYmw is repr Cn(- plods!mnmcttM CaRector. if2-163.1650. Od° Mh 12nd day M Febru-, 3509676 ANG.-AlI IAS, pepuiy perk Proplerty yitu.=Oned Mmp9h _w i T Mny25, 2037 In9evrouN isoda(lon, he/ end mu3t file ° I¢tar 0n o/fl• dry, 3017. auk Oi Me grmX COvrt, sf. LudC Lou^ty the SL Wck County Tex tMiedw F°fadlmD- u M. WR Ms and Inas f C7pS •V G J sJ y %ntC Martin "I'd =slminishativ°C!M<! 101 S.EMonteeY Road Stuar4 Flvdda dM IptkMeed si9Kd by en utMdtCd ropensenLtive If iA<g�ro wa32«Ianpn:"T" inp Met MltM i3 auhharhed car week fw iMOmuD. Fomss- QRP.2I ESiatC 11sPe'em Dkyatllthm Real Estate R32DWeio ms Pule Ap B V: N. M L & 3M7 TCN IS6pOfi3 °Y Nom. e toe TMs Calle �a]12i63-o1fi50. p®� a g7 �iewe All II teastld puaorts hmired tD atand'aM aW Oatle pn Ne Mutln' COUMv Web51a w Wmv- _ a VRML �S�fi btk, ey d. Persons wiMdSebli- U;O.ua.bEA4a5ky 5 i� 153.1 -2- /Q61 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: May 12, 2017 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Subject: Septic Hauler Agreement for the Residuals Dewatering (Biosolids) Facility BACKGROUND On May 2, 2017, the Indian River County (IRC) Board of County Commissioners (BCC) directed staff in the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) to work with the County Attorney's office to create an agreement similar to the one in use by Brevard County that can be tailored for use by IRC haulers who use the Residuals Dewatering Facility (RDF). ANALYSIS: Per BCC direction in the May 2, 2017, meeting, the RDF immediately ceased accepting out -of -county waste from non -Indian River county haulers and will no longer accept any out -of -county waste from Indian River county haulers beginning June 1, 2017. This is the first step in bringing the West Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) into permit compliance. Based on hauler logs submitted in April 2017, two- thirds of the intake at the RDF were from sources outside Indian River County, and the associated loads are inhibiting the ability of the West Regional WWTF to process within the parameters of its permit. Implementing the attached application and agreement will ensure that all Indian River County haulers going forward will know the conditions for using the RDF, and the consequences for bringing anything that would cause an upset or bypass event at the West Regional WWTF. The proposed fine structure is as follows: Page i of 2 C:\Users\GRAN IC-1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Tech no logi es\easyPD F 7\@BCL@F004FC66\@BCL@F004FC66.docx P154 First Offense Second Offense Third Offense Requirements of Acceptance - Item 6: Violation of $500.00 $1,500.00 Revocation item 5 specifying only septage, food establishment of contract sludge and portable restrooms' wastewater and use of facility Disposal Procedures — Item 7: No clean-up of $250.00 $750.00 Revocation spilled waste in discharge areas of contract and use of facility Page i of 2 C:\Users\GRAN IC-1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Tech no logi es\easyPD F 7\@BCL@F004FC66\@BCL@F004FC66.docx P154 FUNDING: Any fines incurred once this agreement goes into effect will go into the operating fund, which is derived from water and sewer sales. ACCOUNT NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT Miscellaneous Income 471034-343670 Variable RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the BCC authorize the implementation of the Application and Agreement for Septage, Food Establishment Sludge and Portable Restrooms' Wastewaterto be effective June 1, 2017, and approve the resolution authorizing the Director of IRCDUS to sign said documents with the haulers. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application and Agreement 2. Resolution 3. Exhibit A: Manifest Log Page 2 of 2 C:\Users\GRANIC-1\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@F004FC66\@BCL@F004FC66.docx P155 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT FOR SEPTAGE, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT SLUDGE AND PORTABLE RESTROOMS' WASTEWATER Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Street Address: h City, State, Zip: Business Phone: After Hours Phone: E-mail: ( �� Website: Number of trucks: Total estimated monthly disposal volume or tonnage:` Under this Application and,Agreement, Indian River County will accept, for treatment and disposal process, wastewater from septage, food -establishment sludge and portable restrooms' wastewater. The applicant desires to disposeof ro ec ss.wastewater in accordance with current regulations. REQUIREMENTS OF ACCEPTANCE �\J 1. All vALsed must meettate and federal regulations governing transport of waste liquid on public roadways. 2. Applicants must provide_ a copy of their Indian River County Occupational License. 3. Applicant is responsible for any damages to Indian River County property or injuries to Indian River County personnel arising from the Applicant's disposal activities. Applicant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify Indian River County with respect to any and all actions, causes of action, liabilities, losses, damages or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or relating to any negligence, intentional misconduct, breach of the requirements set forth herein, or breach of applicable law by Applicant in conjunction with any of the activities described herein. 1 P156 k INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ' APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT FOR SEPTAGE, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT SLUDGE It AND PORTABLE RESTROOMS' WASTEWATER 4. Applicant must have approval from the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) prior to delivery at the Residual Dewatering Facility located at 1325 74th Ave SW, Vero Beach, FL 32968. 5. The only accepted wastes under this Application and Agreement shall be septage, food establishment sludge and portable restrooms' wastewater. All other waste shall be prohibited under this Application and Agreement. The wastes can only include septage, food establishment sludge and portable restrooms' wastewater from and generated in Indian River County. 6. Violation of Item 5 shall be subject to the following penalties: The first violation is subject to a fine of $500. The second violation is subject to a fine of $1,500. A/hird violation shall find this Application and Agreement null and void with privileges cancelled #or the"hauler to use the facility. 7. This Application and Agreement shall be days prior to the end of the year. 8. PAYMENTS, CHARGE ACCOUNT & BILLING. a. The Indian River County landfill ac( alternatively, a charge account is a b. A $500 cash or surety bond isNreq on an nualbasis with the hauler applying 30 ,. opts cash; checks and credit cards for'payments; ,ailab le. Please note, American Express is not accepted. red to, use the kc s. c. A minimum of $2,000 cash or surety bondisrequired io.setu,p a charge account. This establishes `,cree t limit. If at any\time the acco nu t balance`exceeds the credit limit, the account will go on hold. To avoid disruption it is recommended that the bond reflect two months of`a.ivi y. 1 1 d. Bills for monthly charges/and_fees are de on the 20th da from the date of the invoice. If y\ \ i Y any monthly bill remains unpaid on -the 21St``day of the month for such service, a penalty shall be imp`ed and`ad ed o the inv`e. n`tlie amount of two dollars ($2.00) plus one and <� e -half percent (1%%) interest monthly.—)`e.N�opayment with, t rty (3 � d ys, credit is stopped (placed on hold). f. Non-payment within forty-five (45) days shall be grounds to terminate the acceptance of wastewater for treatment. g. Non-paym` t.withi sixty (60) days, the Cash or Surety Bond shall be utilized to satisfy the payment of .he amount.due including interest or any cost associated with collection. Collection of a y`emaining monies due shall be pursued as provided by law and may be grounds for legal action. 9. Prior to any disposal activity, the Applicant will provide to Indian River County at the time of application a certificate(s) of insurance verifying auto liability insurance with combined limits for bodily injury and property insurance in an amount no less than $300,000 per occurrence. Indian River County shall be covered as additional insured. Insurance must remain in effect and a current certificate be kept on file in Indian River County. 2 P157 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT FOR SEPTAGE, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT SLUDGE AND PORTABLE RESTROOMS' WASTEWATER 10. The Applicant shall not assign any interest in this application and agreement and shall not transfer any interest without the prior written consent of the County. 11. The current disposal fees are $15.00 per wet ton of wastewater, which rate is subject to change per approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 12. Indian River County reserves the right to cancel and terminate this is Application and Agreement and the right of Applicant to dispose of process wastewater at the'Residuals Dewatering Facility in the event of a violation of the terms of this Application and Agreement or a bypass or upset event. Indian River County also reserves the right to seek any otherremedy at law or in equity in the event of a violation of the terms of this Application and Agre ent or a 4ypass or upset event. DISPOSAL PROCEDURES 1 2. Disposal services are open to cu: week. The Residual Dewatering Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Each vehicle mush we accompanied by an a/c 3. Applica chemic 4. The off minute 5. Discharge may be discharge. a. pH must be with act Iity AWeen 7 am acid 5 Day, July 4th, La bo 7 days per load of wastewater must be attached hereto as Exhibit tprior to the delivery of the first load of any treatment or changes in chemicals or products must be regulated so as to distribute the load over a minimum of a 20 - `assure there are no backups in the plant drainage system. b,y Indian River County at any time to test the characteristics of the .5.5 to 9.5 s.u. to be accepted. 6. All drivers shall enter waste discharge bays in a manner that accommodates other trucks waiting to dispose of wastewater. 7. All spilled waste in paved discharge areas must be hosed down after every disposal of wastewater. If the areas are not hosed down and the site is left a mess, there will be the following penalties: the first violation is subject to a clean-up fee of $250. The second violation is subject to a clean-up fee of 3 P158 - V INDIAN RIVER COUNTY APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT FOR SEPTAGE, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT SLUDGE AND PORTABLE RESTROOMS' WASTEWATER $750. These will be added to your account. A third violation shall find this Application and Agreement null and void with privileges cancelled for the hauler to use the facility. 8. Wash hoses must be coiled and hung back on hose rack after each use. 9. Vehicle vacuum pump oil blow -down discharge is strictly prohibited. 10. In the event of malfunction that may prohibit off-loading, you an alternate method or location for dumping if this occurs. , Plant/County Contacts Indian River County Department of Utility Services I have read and understand the requi Signature, Director, I Per Resolution 2017 - Date Department of Utility Services 4 notified and assisted in finding P159 RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR, ON BEHALF OF THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, TO EXECUTE THE APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT FOR SEPTAGE, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT SLUDGE AND PORTABLE RESTROOMS WASTEWATER FOR HAULER DISPOSAL AT THE RESIDUAL DEWATERING FACILITY WHEREAS, effective June 1, 2017, haulers of Indian River County generated septage, food establishment sludge and portable restrooms wastewater will be required to execute the Application and Agreement for Septage, Food Establishment Sludge and Portable Restrooms Wastewater in order to dispose of such wastes at the Residual Dewatering Facility located at 1325 74th Ave SW, Vero Beach, FL 32968; and WHEREAS, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners desires that the Utilities Department Director execute such Application and Agreement for Septage, Food Establishment Sludge and Portable Restrooms Wastewater with haulers who wish to dispose of such wastes at the Residual Dewatering Facility in the form consistent with the Application and Agreement for Septage, Food Establishment Sludge and Portable Restrooms Wastewater attached hereto as Exhibit "A". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: 1. The above -recitals are affirmed; 2. The Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (the "Board') hereby specifically delegates to the Utilities Department Director the authority to execute, on behalf of the Board, the Application and Agreement for Septage, Food Establishment Sludge and Portable Restrooms Wastewater with haulers who wish to dispose of such wastes at the Residual Dewatering Facility in substantially the form attached hereto. The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner and seconded by Commissioner . and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Chairman Joseph E. Flescher Vice Chairman Peter D. O'Bryan Commissioner Susan Adams Commissioner Tim Zorc Commissioner Bob Solari 1 P160 RESOLUTION NO. 2017 - The Chairman thereupon declared the Resolution duly passed and adopted this _ day of May, 2017. Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Dylan Reingold County Attorney 2 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By Joseph E. Flescher, Chairman P161 VF . INDIAN RIVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES SEPTAGE & GREASE MANIFEST LOG � •a HAULING COMPANY BUS. (✓) DRIVER NAME (PRINT) DATE PUMPED DRIVER SIGNATURE GREASE (✓) TELEPHONE # / EMAIL TANKER # TANKER VOLUME NAME/ADDRESS OF COLLECTION RES. (✓) BUS. (✓) TYPE OF BUS. DATE PUMPED SEPTIC (✓) GREASE (✓) VOLUME (gal.) TOTAL GAL SCALE HOUSE OPERATOR: COH(772)226-3423 DATE: TIME: TONS: if any questions. 1325 74th Avenue SW Vero Beach, FL 32968 Revised 3/2017