Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/12/2017'Oki�� ORWi BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY FLORIDA COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12,2017 - 9:00 AM Commission Chambers Indian River County Administration Complex 1801 27th Street, Building A Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-3388 www.ircgov.com COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman, District 4 Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Bob Solari, Vice Chairman, District 5 Dylan Reingold, County Attorney Susan Adams, District I Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller Joseph E. Flescher, District 2 Tim Zorc, District 3 1. CALL TO ORDER 2.A. A MOMENT OF SILENT REFLECTION FOR FIRST RESPONDERS 2.13. INVOCATION Pastor Hugh King, First Church of the Nazarene 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Jason E. Brown, County Administrator 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA /EMERGENCY ITEMS 5. PROCLAMATIONS and PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Presentation of Proclamation Honoring William H. Wilson on his Retirement from the Property Appraiser's Office of Indian River County 5.11. Presentation by Barbara Hoffinan, Executive Director, Cultural Council on the Results of the Arts and Economic Prosperity 5 Impact Study. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6.A. Regular Meeting of October 24, 2017 6.B. Regular Meeting of November 7, 2017 7. INFORMATION ITEMS FROM STAFF OR COMMISSIONERS NOT REQUIRING BOARD ACTION December 12. 2017 Page 1 of 4 7.A. Proclamation Honoring John Duran on His Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Emergency Services with Thirty -One Years of Service 7.B. Proclamation Honoring Betty Davis Scroggs on Her Retirement From Indian River County Board of County Commissioners Department of Community Development Code Enforcement Division with Thirty -Six Years of Service 8. CONSENT AGENDA 8.A. Checks and Electronic Payments November 24, 2017 to November 30, 2017 8.B. Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2A with Masteller & Moler, Inc., IRC Courthouse Judges Security Upgrades 8.C. Right -of -Way Acquisition - 66th Avenue Widening Project Franklin J. Tate & Donna Tate - 6780 69th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967 8.1). Work Order No. 6 Atkins North America, Inc., Wabasso Fishing Pier Demolition Project - Phase 2 Services 8.E. Developer Agreement for the Extension of the Water Main along 80th Avenue 8.F. Approval of Change Order and Final Pay for Blue Goose Construction Work Authorization No. 2017-004 to Replace a Water Main in "Heron Cay" Mobile Home Park 8.G. Assumption and Joinder to Agreement for Food Concession Services and Lease at Sandridge Golf Club 9. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS and GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 9.A. Indian River County Supervisor of Elections Leslie R. Swan: Request to have city revenues received from conducting November municipal elections to be rolled into the 2017/2018 general operating budget 10. PUBLIC ITEMS A. PUBLIC HEARINGS B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS 10.13.1. Request to Speak from Paul Fafeita Regarding Oslo Road Boat Ramp 10.13.2. Request to Speak from Ardra Rigby and Bill Rigby Regarding Demolitions in West Wabasso Community 10.13.3. Request to Speak from Pastor Ervin Cartwright Regarding Demolitions in West Wabasso Community C. PUBLIC NOTICE ITEMS 11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS December 12. 2017 Page 2 of 4 12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS A. Community Development 12.A.1. Consideration of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan Annual Report Card for 2017 B. Emergency Services C. General Services 1. Human Services 2. Sandridge Golf Club 3. Recreation D. Human Resources E. Office of Management and Budget F. Public Works G. Utilities Services 13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS 14. COMMISSIONERS MATTERS A. Commissioner Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman B. Commissioner Bob Solari, Vice Chairman C. Commissioner Susan Adams D. Commissioner Joseph E. Flescher E. Commissioner Tim Zorc 15. SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND BOARDS A. Emergency Services District B. Solid Waste Disposal District C. Environmental Control Board 16. ADJOURNMENT December 12. 2017 Page 3 of 4 Except for those matters specifically exempted under the State Statute and Local Ordinance, the Board shall provide an opportunity for public comment prior to the undertaking by the Board of any action on the agenda, including those matters on the Consent Agenda. Public comment shall also be heard on any proposition which the Board is to take action which was either not -on the Board agenda or distributed to the public prior to the commencement of the meeting. Anyone who may wish to appeal any decision which may be made at this meeting will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal will be based. Anyone who needs a special accommodation for this meeting may contact the County's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (772) 226-1223 at least 48 hours in advance of meeting. Anyone who needs special accommodation with a hearing aid for this meeting may contact the Board of County Commission Office at 772-226-1490 at least 20 hours in advance of the meeting. The full agenda is available on line at the Indian River County Website at www.ircgov.com The full agenda is also available for review in the Board of County Commission Office, the Indian River County Main Library, and the North County Library. Commission Meetings are broadcast live on Comcast Cable Channel 27 Rebroadcasts continuously with the following proposed schedule: Tuesday at 6:00 p.m. until Wednesday at 6:00 a.m., Wednesday at 9:00 a. m. until 5:00 p. m., Thursday at 1:00 p.m. through Friday Morning, and Saturday at 12:00 Noon to 5:00 p.m. December 12. 2017 Page 4 of 4 PROCLAMATION HONORING WILLIAM H. WILSON ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM THE PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY WHEREAS, William H. Wilson will retire from the Property Appraiser's Office of Indian River County effective, December 29, 2017; and, WHEREAS, William H. Wilson has been employed with the Property Appraiser's Office of Indian River County starting July 9, 1996, where he has continued in the capacity of Cadastral Mapper until his retirement; and, WHEREAS, William H. Wilson has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During his years of service, he was dedicated to his work and was greatly appreciated by Property Appraiser, David C. Nolte and his co-workers alike. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Board applauds William H. Wilson's efforts on behalf of the Property Appraiser's Office, and the Board wishes to express their appreciation for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last twenty-one years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board and staff extend heartfelt wishes for success in his future endeavors! Adopted this 12th day of December, 2017. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Bob Solari, Vice Chairman Susan Adams Joseph E. Flescher Tim Zorc P1 ArtsUconomic d Prosperity°S A Project of Americans for the Arts The Economic Impact of Nonprofit Arts and Cultural Organizations and Their Audiences in INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL The Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 study provides compelling evidence that the nonprofit arts and culture sector is a $24.9 million industry in Indian River County—one that supports 651 full-time equivalent jobs and generates $3 million in local and state government revenue. Nonprofit arts and cultural organizations, which spent $16 million during 2015, leveraged a remarkable $8.9 million in additional spending by their audiences— spending that pumped vital revenue into restaurants, hotels, retail stores, parking garages, and other local businesses. By proving that investing in the arts and culture yields economic benefits, Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 lays to rest the misconception that communities support arts and culture at the expense of local economic development. In fact, communities that support the arts and culture not only enhance their quality of life—they also invest in their economic well-being. The arts mean business in Indian River County! Total Direct Expenditures $24,874,172 Full -Time Equivalent Jobs 651 Resident Household Income $12,661,000 Local Government Revenue $1,127,000 State Government Revenue $1,893,000 For study details, visit www.cultural-council.org. Source: Americans for the Arts, 2017 (www.AmericansForTheArt rg). TIJI The impact of spending by nonprofit arts and cultural organizations is far reaching: they pay their employees, purchase supplies, and acquire assets within the local community. Additionally, unlike most industries, the arts leverage significant event -related spending by their audiences. Whether serving the local community or out-of-town visitors, a vibrant arts and culture industry helps local businesses thrive. rnpact of the.Nonprofit Arts and Cultural Organizations Total Direct Expenditures $16,019,023 Full -Time Equivalent Jobs 471 Resident Household Income $9,468,000 Local Government Revenue $796,000 State Government Revenue $1,328,000 Impact of the Nonprofit Arts and Cultural Audiences Total Direct Expenditures $8,855,149 Full -Time Equivalent Jobs 180 Resident Household Income $3,193,000 Local Government Revenue $331,000 State Government Revenue $565,000 Attendance 259,676 87,021 Percent of Total 74.9% 25.1% Per Person Average $18.90 $45.36 Total Spending $4,907,876 $3,947,273 DollarsAverage Refreshments/Snacks At Event $5.32 Meals Before/After Event $10.05 Souvenirs and Gifts $5.00 Clothing and Accessories $0.99 Ground Transportation $2.01 Event -Related Child Care $0.14 Overnight Lodging (one night only) $2.05 Other/Miscellaneous $0.00 Total Per Person Spending $25.56 t Residents live within Indian River County; Nonresidents live elsewhere. I 9 w. AMERICANS ECONOMIC PROSPERITY 5 ��� THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NONPROFIT ARTS &CULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS &THEIR AUDIENCES Arts and Economic Prosperity® S was conducted by Americans for the Arts, the nation's nonprofit organization for advancing the arts in America. Established in 1960, we are dedicated to representing and serving local communities and creating opportunities for every American to participate in and appreciate all forms of the arts. Copyright 2017 by Americans for the Arts, 1000 Vermont Avenue NW, Sixth Floor, Washington, DC 20005. Arts & Economic Prosperity is a registered trademark of Americans for the Arts. Reprinted by permission. Printed in the United States. Table of Content's ..................................................................................................................................... The IS MeanBusiness ........................................................... 1 By Robert L. Lynch, President and CEO, Americans for the Arts The 111 1- is I pact oaf the Nonprof �t Arts and Culture Industry inn Iindian River County..................................................................3 Defining Economic Impact.....................................................................3 Economic Impact of the Nonprofit Arts and Culture lndustry...............4 Direct, Indirect, and Induced Economic Impact: How a Dollar is Respent in the Economy..........................................................5 Economic Impact of Spending by Nonprofit =Arts Cultural OO RGAN4ZATIOO NS.................................................................6 An Economic Impact Beyond Dollars: Volunteerism .......................7 TheValue of 1n-Kind Contributions to Arr FW r"Fa nizations ..............7 Economic Impact of Spending by Nonproft Arts and Cultural IENS CES...........................................................................8 Cultural Tourists Spend More............................................................9 The Arts DD rice Tourism.....................................................................10 The Arts Retain Local Dollars........................................................... l U Travel Party and Demographic Characteristics of Arts Attendees .... l l Conclusion.................................................................................13 Arts c& Economic Prosperity S Calculator................................15 Economic Impact per $100,000 of Spending by Nonproft Arts an, Cultural OO RGANiIZAT10O NS...................................................15 Economic Impact per $10U,000 of Spending by Nonproft Arts and Cultural A W0I;EN,CES.............................................................16 Making Comparisons with Similar S t u a 3 Regions................................17 About Th�i�s Study.......................................................................19 Frequently Used Ter s.............................................................25 Frequently Asked Questions.....................................................27 Acowledg ents.... ..... .... ............. .......... ... ..... ... ................. ........... ....... ... .......2�9 IT I- S "Understanding and acknowledging the incredible economic impact of the nonprofit arts and culture, we must always remember their fundamental value. They foster beauty, creativity, originality, and vitality. The arts inspire us, sooth us, provoke us, involve us, and connect us. But they also create jobs and contribute to the economy." Robert L. Lynch President and CEO Americans for the Arts IT � LP The Arts Mean Business By Robert L. Lynch, President and CEO, Americans for the Arts In my travels, I meet business and government leaders who speak passionately about the value the arts bring to their communities—fueling creativity, beautifying downtowns, and providing joy. Many also share with me the challenge of balancing arts funding with the demands to support jobs and grow their economy. To these community leaders, Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 offers a clear and welcome message: the arts are an investment that delivers both community well-being and economic vitality. Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 (AEP5) is Americans for the Arts' fifth economic impact study of the nation's nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and their audiences. By every measure, the results are impressive. Nationally, the nonprofit arts industry generated $166.3 billion of economic activity in 2015—$63.8 billion in spending by arts and cultural organizations and an additional $102.5 billion in event - related expenditures by their audiences. This activity supported 4.6 million jobs and generated $27.5 billion in revenue to local, state, and federal governments (a yield well beyond their collective $5 billion in arts allocations). AEP5 is the most comprehensive study of its kind ever conducted. It provides detailed economic impact findings on 341 study regions representing all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data was gathered from 14,439 organizations and 212,691 arts event attendees, and our project economists customized input-output models for each and every study region to ensure reliable and actionable localized results. When Americans for the Arts published its first economic impact study in 1994, it worked with 33 local communities. As evidence of the value of these studies, AEP5 has grown this local participation ten- fold. We also have witnessed a corresponding growth in the understanding of the economic value of the arts. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, for example, now publishes an annual Arts R Cullural Production Satellite Account, which extends beyond the nonprofit sector to include the full breadth of commercial and for-profit arts, education, and individual artists, and lists the sector as a $730 billion industry (4.2 percent of the nation's GDP—a larger share of the economy than AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 transportation, tourism, agriculture, and construction). As another example, many state and local governments have established agencies to track and grow their creative economy. What continues to set AEP5 apart from other studies is exactly why it is so useful: it uses localized research that not only focuses on arts organizations—but also incorporates the event -related spending by their audiences. When patrons attend an arts event, they may pay for parking, eat dinner at a restaurant, enjoy dessert after the show, and return home to pay the babysitter. The study found that the typical attendee spends $31.47 per person, per event beyond the cost of admission. AEP5 also shows that one-third of attendees (34 percent) traveled from outside the county in which the arts event took place. Their event -related spending was more than twice that of their local counterparts ($47.57 vs. $23.44). What brought those visitors to town? Two- thirds (69 percent) indicated that the primary purpose for their visit was to attend that arts event. The message is clear: a vibrant arts community not only keeps residents and their discretionary spending close to home, it also attracts visitors who spend money and help local businesses thrive. AEP5 demonstrates that the arts provide both cultural and economic benefits. No longer do community leaders need to feel that a choice must be made between arts funding and economic development. Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 proves that they can choose both. Nationally as well as locally, the arts mean business. "Even in a strong economy, some may perceive the arts as an unaffordable luxury. Fortunately, this rigorous report offers evidence that the nonprofit arts industry provides not just cultural benefits to our communities, but also makes significant positive economic contributions to the nation's financial well-being regardless of the overall state of the economy. The arts as a driver of employment, vibrancy, tourism, and building a creative workforce is certainly something to applaud." Jonathan Spector President & CEO The Conference Board AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 The Economic Impact of the Nonprofit Arts and Culture Industry in Indian River County Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 provides evidence that the nonprofit arts and culture sector is a significant industry in Indian River County—one that generates $24.9 million in total economic activity. This spending—$16 million by nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and an additional $8.9 million in event -related spending by their audiences—supports 651 full-time equivalent jobs, generates $12.7 million in household income to local residents, and, delivers $3 million in local and state government revenue. This economic impact study sends a strong signal that when we support the arts, we not only enhance our quality of life, but we also invest in Indian River County's economic well-being. This Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 study documents the economic impact of the nonprofit arts and culture sector in 341 study regions -1 13 cities, 115 counties, 81 multicity or multicounty regions, 20 states, and 12 arts districts—representing all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. The diverse study regions range in population (1,500 to four million) and type (rural to large urban). Economists customized input-output models to calculate specific and reliable findings for each study region. This study focuses solely on the economic impact of nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and event -related spending by their audiences. Spending by individual artists and the for- profit arts and culture sector (e.g., Broadway or the motion picture industry) are excluded from this study. The geographic area analyzed in this unique report is defined as Indian River County, Florida. AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 Defining Economic Impact . j This proprietary study methodology uses four economic 'r measures to define economic impact: full-time equivalent jobs, resident household income, and local j and state government revenues. Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) Jobs describes the total amount of labor employed. An FTE job can be one full-- time employee, two half-time employees, etc. . Economists measure FTE jobs, not the total number of employees, because it is a more accurate measure that accounts for. part-time employment. Resident Household Income (often called Personal Income) includes salaries, wages; and entrepreneurial income paid to residents. It is the money residents earn and.use to pay for food, shelter, utilities; and other living expenses. Revenue to Local and State Government includes revenue from local and state taxes (e.g., income, sales, lodging, real estate, personal property, and other local j option taxes) as well as funds from license fees, utility fees, filing fees, and other similar sources. Local government revenue includes funds to governmental units such as city, county, township, and school districts, and other special districts. 3 Economic Impact of Spending by the Nonprofit Arts and Culture Industry (Combined Spending by Both Organizations and Their Audiences) in Indian River County In communities coast-to-coast, from our smallest towns to our largest cities, America's 100,000 nonprofit arts and cultural organizations make their communities more desirable places to live and work every day of the year. The arts and culture provide inspiration and joy to residents, beautify public spaces, and strengthen the social fabric of our communities. Nonprofit arts and cultural organizations are also businesses. They employ people locally, purchase goods and services from other local businesses, and attract tourists. Event -related spending by arts audiences generates valuable revenue for local merchants such as restaurants, retail stores, parking garages, and hotels. During fiscal year 2015, spending by both Indian River County's nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and their audiences totaled $24.9 million. The table below demonstrates the total economic impact of these expenditures. 7 ABLE l :. - Total Economic.lmpact.of thcilonprofit Arts -- and Culture Industry — — in Indian•River Count --- -- -; :—, (Combined Spending by Nonprofit Arts and Cultural ....... , ... r, Organizations acid ........ Their Audiences) - � Median of Similar Study Regions Indian River County Pop. _ 100,000 to 249,999 National Median Total. Expenditures $31,381,076 1 Full -Time Equivalent •• 1 . Resident Household Income S12,661,000 $19,916,500 $23,154,000 Local• III 26%000 407,000 GovernmentState Revenue SI,893,000 111 The Arts Improve the Economy ... and the Quality of our Personal Lives ✓ 82 percent of Americans believe the arts&culture are important to local businesses and the economy ✓ 87 percent of Americans believe the arts & culture are important to quality of life Source: Americans for the Arts' 2016 survey of 3,020 adults by Ipsos Public Affairs 4 AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 ?I ..1-16 "The success of my family's business depends on finding and cultivating a creative and innovative workforce. I have witnessed firsthand the power of the arts in building these business skills. When we participate personally in the arts, we strengthen our `creativity muscles,' which makes us not just a better ceramicist or chorus member, but a more creative worker—better able to identify challenges and innovative business solutions." — Christopher Forbes, Vice Chairman, Forbes, Inc. Economic Impact:, Total, Direct, Indirect, and Induced How can a dollar be respeni? Consider the example of a theater company that purchases a five -gallon bucket of paint from its local hardware store for $100—a very simple transaction at the outset, but one that initiates a. complex sequence of income and spending by both individuals and other businesses. :. Following the paint purchase, the hardware store may use a portion of the $100 to pay the sales clerk I who sold the bucket of paint. The sales clerk then respends some of the money for groceries; the grocery store uses some of the money to pay its cashier; the cashier then spends some of the money 1 for rent; and so on. j The hardware store also uses some of the $100 to purchase goods and services from -other businesses, 1: such as the local utility company, and then to buy a new bucket of paint from the�paint factory t -o restock its shelf. -Those businesses, in turn, respend the money -they earned from the hardware.store to buy goods and services from still other local businesses, and so on. i Eventually, the last of the $100 is spent outside of the community and no longer has a local economic impact: It is considered to have leaked out of the community. . The total economic impact describes this full economic effect, starting with the theater's initial paint purchase and 'ending when the last of the $100 leaks out of the community. It is composed of the direct economic impact (the effect of the initial expenditure by the theater), as well as the indirect and induced economic impacts, which are the effects of the subsequent rounds of spending by businesses and individuals, respectively. Interestingly, a dollar ripples very differently through each community, which is why an input-output model - ivas customised for the unique economy, of Indian River County: - AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 5 Economic Impact of Spending by Nonprofit Arts and Cultural ORGANIZATIONS in Indian River County Nonprofit arts and culture organizations are active contributors to their business community. They are employers, producers, and consumers. They are members of the Chamber of Commerce as well as key partners in the marketing and promotion of their cities, regions, and states. Spending by nonprofit arts and cultural organizations totaled $16 million in Indian River County during fiscal year 2015. This spending is far- reaching: organizations pay employees, purchase supplies, contract for services, and acquire assets within their community. These actions, in turn, support jobs, generate household income, and generate revenue to local and state governments. Indian River County's nonprofit arts and cultural organizations provide rewarding employment for more than just administrators, artists, curators, choreographers, and musicians. They also employ financial staff, facility managers, and salespeople. In addition, the spending by these organizations directly supports a wide array of other occupations spanning many industries that provide their goods and services (e.g., accounting, construction, event planning, legal, logistics, printing, and technology). Data were collected from 10 eligible nonprofit arts and cultural organizations that are located in Indian River County. Each provided detailed budget information for fiscal year 2015 (e.g., labor, payments to local and nonlocal artists, operations, administration, programming, facilities, and capital expenditures/asset acquisition). The following table demonstrates the total economic impact of their aggregate spending. AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 T I I L Economic.Impact Beyond Dollars: Volunteerism While arts volunteers may not have an economic impact as defined in this study, they clearly have an enormous impact by helping nonprofit arts and cultural organizations function as a viable industry. Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 reveals a significant contribution to nonprofit arts and cultural organizations as a result of volunteerism. During 2015, a total of 1,364 volunteers donated a total of 66,418 hours to Indian River County's participating nonprofit arts and cultural organizations. This represents a donation of time with an estimated aggregate value of $1,564,808 (Independent Sector estimates the dollar value of the average 2015 volunteer hour to be $23.56). Volunteers can include unpaid professional staff (e.g., executive and program staff, board/commission members), artistic volunteers (e.g., artists, choreographers, designers), clerical volunteers, and service volunteers (e.g., ticket takers, docents, ushers, gift shop volunteers). The 10 participating organizations reported an average of 136.4 volunteers who volunteered an average of 48.7 hours during 2015, for a total of 6,641.8 hours per organization. The Value of In -Kind Contributions to Arts Organizations The organizations were asked about the sources and value of their in-kind support. In-kind contributions are non- cash donations such as materials (e.g., office supplies from a local retailer), facilities (e.g., office or performance space), and services (e.g., printing from a local printer). The 10 participating nonprofit arts and cultural organizations in Indian River County reported that they received in-kind contributions with an aggregate value of $347,120 during fiscal year 2015. These contributions can be received from a variety of sources including corporations, individuals, local and state arts agencies, and government agencies. "Investments in arts and culture enhance the quality of life, the third-highest measurement businesses use when gauging development trends—behind skilled labor and highway accessibility but ahead of other factors such as corporate tax rates and incentives. These investments are breathing new life into our downtown areas, creating educational opportunities, and attracting businesses.and highly skilled workers to Iowa. Today, nearly 6,000 arts organizations employ 23,000 people in Iowa, and that number jumps to 73,000 when all creative fields are counted. In all, that's about four percent of our workforce." — Governor Kim Reynolds, Iowa AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 _PI -I3 Economic Impact of Spending by Nonprofit Arts and Cultural AUDIENCES in Indian River County The nonprofit arts and culture industry, unlike most industries, leverages a significant amount of event -related spending by its audiences. For example, when patrons attend a cultural event, they may pay to park their car, purchase dinner at a restaurant, shop in nearby stores, eat dessert after the show, and pay a babysitter upon their return home. Attendees from out of town often spend the night in a hotel. This spending generates related commerce for local businesses such as restaurants, parking garages, retail stores, and hotels. Local businesses that cater to arts and culture audiences reap the rewards of this economic activity. To measure the impact of spending by cultural audiences in Indian River County, data were collected from 768 event attendees during 2016. Researchers used an audience -intercept methodology, a standard technique in which patrons are asked to complete a short survey about their event -related spending (while they are attending the event). In Indian River County, cultural attendees spent an average of $25.56 per person, per event as a direct result of their attendance at the event. The 10 participating nonprofit arts and cultural organizations reported that the aggregate attendance to their events was 346,697 during 2015. Event -related spending by these attendees totaled $8.9 million in Indian River County during fiscal year 2015, excluding the cost of event admission. The following table demonstrates the total economic impact of this spending. Why exclude the cost of admission? The admissions paid by attendees are excluded from the audience analysis because those dollars are captured in the operating budgets of the participating nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and, in turn, are spent by the organizations. This methodology avoids "double -counting' those dollars in the study analysis. AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 Cultural Tourists Spend More The 768 audience survey respondents were asked to provide the ZIP code of their primary residence, enabling researchers to determine which attendees were local residents (live within Indian River County) and which were nonresidents (live outside Indian River County). In Indian River County, researchers estimate that 74.9 percent of the 346,697 nonprofit arts attendees were residents; 25.1 percent were nonresidents. Nonresident attendees spent an average of 140 percent more per person than local attendees ($45.36 vs. $18.90) as a result of their attendance to cultural events. As would be expected from a traveler, higher spending was typically found in the categories of lodging, meals, and transportation. When a community attracts cultural tourists, it harnesses significant economic rewards. - TABLE 4- Event -Related Spending,by Arts and C61ture,Event Attendees Totaled $8.9 million in Indian River Indian the cost of event admission) . Residents Residents j Nonresidents I J All Indian RiverCounty , Event Attendees $4.93 Total Attendance $5.32 Meals Before/After Event Percent of Attendees $15.10 oil. Average Dollars Spent Per Attendee : '1 $10.28 Total 9t $0.43 -An Indian River i Residents i 1Indian River Couniy'- Refreshments/Snacks During Event $4.93 $6.48 $5.32 Meals Before/After Event $8.35 $15.10 $10.05 Souvenirs and Gifts $3.23 $10.28 $5.00 Clothing and Accessories $0.43 $2.66 $0.99 Ground Transportation $1.35 $3.97 $2.01 Event -Related Child Care $0.16 $0.07 $0.14 Overnight Lodging (one nighl only) $0.45 $6.80 $2.05 Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Per Person Spending $18.90 545.36 S25.56 AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 T.116 The Arts Drive Tourism Each of the nonresident survey respondents (i.e., those who live outside Indian River County) were asked about the purpose of their trip: 71.0 percent indicated that the primary purpose of their visit to Indian River County was "specifically to attend this arts/cultural event." This finding demonstrates the power of the arts to attract visitors to the community. The audience -intercept survey also asked nonresident attendees if they would have traveled somewhere else (instead of to Indian River County) if the event where they were surveyed had not occurred: 50.3 percent of nonresident attendees would have "traveled to a different community to attend a similar cultural event." Of the 25.1 percent of arts attendees who are nonresidents, 7.3 percent reported an overnight lodging expense. Not surprisingly, nonresident attendees with overnight expenses spent considerably more money per person during their visit to Indian River County than did nonresident attendees without overnight lodging expenses ($222.35 and $31.52, respectively). For this analysis, only one night of lodging expenses is counted toward the audience expenditure, regardless of how many nights these cultural tourists actually stayed in the community. This conservative approach ensures that the audience -spending figures are not inflated by non -arts -related spending. The Arts Retain Local Dollars The survey also asked local resident attendees about what they would have done if the arts event that they were attending was not taking place: 43.2 percent of resident attendees said they would have "traveled to a different community to attend a similar cultural event." The cultural tourism findings on this page demonstrate the economic impact of the nonprofit arts and culture industry in its truest sense. If a community fails to provide a variety of artistic and cultural experiences, not only will it fail to attract new dollars from cultural tourists, it will also lose the discretionary spending of its own residents who will travel elsewhere for a similar experience. "As a banker, I have visited businesses in almost every city and town in my state. There is a visible difference in places with a vibrant arts community. I see people looking for places to park, stores staying open late, and restaurants packed with diners. The business day is extended and the cash registers are ringing!" Ken Fergeson, Chairman, NBC Oklahoma Past President, American Bankers Association E AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 1-4 Travel Party and Demographic Characteristics of Arts Attendees The tables below list the audience -intercept survey findings related to travel party size as well as the age, educational attainment, and household income reported by the survey respondents. Travel Party Size Average number of adults (18 years or older) 2.2 2.3 Average number of children (younger than 18) 0.2 0.1 Average travel party size 2.4 2.4 Trip Characteristics Average number of nights spent away from home as a result of arts event 0.1 0.4 Percentage with any nights spent away from home as a result of arts event 2.3% 17.1% Percentage attending the arts event or facility (where they were surveyed) for the first time 33.1% 55.8% Age of Cultural Attendees 18-34 12.0% 13.5% 35-44 17.1% 17.8% 45-54 14.0% 11.9% 55-64 28.1% 25.4% 65 or Older 28.8% 31.4% Educational Attainment of Cultural Attendees Less than high school 0.4% 0.0% High school 8.9% 6.3% 2 -year college/technical/associates degree 25.4% 21.5% 4 -year college/bachelors degree 42.4% 36.1% Masters degree 18.2% 29.1% Doctoral degree 4.8% 7.0% Annual Household Income of Cultural Attendees Less than $40.000 12.3% 12.1% $40,000 to $59,999 19.4% 12.1% $60,000 to $79.999 31.5% 20.2% $80,000 to $99,999 11.0% 17.7% $100,000 to $119;999 8.9% 12.9% $120,000 or More 16.8% 25.0% Civic Engagement of Cultural Attendees Percentage that voted in 2016 U.S. presidential election 91.8% 91.4% AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 111P i -i7 "Mayors understand the connection between the arts industry and city revenues. Arts activity creates thousands of direct and indirect jobs and generates billions in government and business revenues. The arts also make our cities destinations for tourists, help attract and retain businesses, and play an important role in the economic revitalization of cities and the vibrancy of our neighborhoods." — Oklahoma City Mayor Mick Cornett President, The United States Conference of Mayors 12 AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity S 0 Conclusion The nonprofit arts and culture sector is a $24.9 million industry in Indian River County—one that supports 651 full-time equivalent jobs and generates $3 million in local and state government revenue. Nonprofit arts and cultural organizations are businesses in their own right. They spent $16 million during fical year 2015 to employ people locally, purchase goods and services from local establishments, and attract tourists. They also leveraged a remarkable $8.9 million in additional spending by cultural audiences—spending that pumps vital revenue into restaurants, hotels, retail stores, parking garages, and other local businesses. This study puts to rest a misconception that communities support arts and culture at the expense of local economic development. In fact, communities that support the arts and culture are investing in an industry that supports jobs, generates government revenue, and is the cornerstone of tourism. This Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 study shows conclusively that the arts mean business in Indian River County! AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 nJ "A vital component to generating economic growth in our communities can be attributed to supporting and funding the arts. It is apparent that decreased support of the arts has negatively impacted some areas of our country. To compete and thrive in today's workforce environment it is apparent that supporting the arts helps foster a more creative and innovative workforce that strengthens our economy." Nevada Assemblywoman Maggie Carlton Co -Chair, National Conference of State Legislatures Labor & Economic Development Committee 14 AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity S The Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 Calculator To make it easier to compare the economic impacts of different organizations within Indian River County (or to calculate updated estimates in the immediate years ahead), the project researchers calculated the economic impact per $100,000 of direct spending by nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and their audiences. Economic Impact Per $100,000 of Direct Spending by ORGANIZATIONS For every $100,000 in direct spending by a nonprofit arts and cultural organization in Indian River County, there was the following total economic impact. Full -Time Equivalent Jobs 2.94 4.13 3.52 Resident Household Income 559,105 $74,554 $74,554 Local Government Revenue 54,969 $3,820 $3,563 State Government Revenue 58,290 $4,155 $4,891 An Example of How to Use the Organizational Spending Calculator Table (above): An administrator from a nonprofit arts and cultural organization that has total expenditures of $250,000 wants to determine the organization's total economic impact on full-time equivalent (FTE) employment in Indian River County. The administrator would: 1. Determine the amount spent by the nonprofit arts and cultural organization; 2. Divide the total expenditure by 100,000; and 3. Multiply that figure by the FTE employment ratio per $100,000 for Indian River County. Thus, $250,000 divided by 100,000 equals 2.5; 2.5 times 2.94 (from the top row of data on Table 1 above) equals a total of 7.4 full-time equivalent jobs supported (both directly and indirectly) within Indian River County by that nonprofit arts and cultural organization. Using the same procedure, the estimate can be calculated for resident household income as well as for local and state government revenue. Artc d- l conomic l'ro.vperity 5 I Americans for the Arts 15 -21 Economic Impact Per $100,000 of Direct Spending by AUDIENCES The economic impact of event -related spending by arts audiences can also be derived for an individual organization or groups of organizations in Indian River County. The first step is to determine the total estimated event -related spending by attendees who are residents of Indian River County. To derive this figure, first multiply the total attendance by the percentage of attendees that are residents. Then, multiply the result by the average per person event -related expenditure by resident attendees. The result is the total estimated event -related spending by resident attendees. The second step is to do the same for nonresidents of Indian River County. To derive this figure, first multiply the total attendance by the percentage of attendees that are nonresidents. Then, multiply the result by the average per person event -related expenditure by nonresident attendees. The result is the total estimated event -related spending by nonresident attendees. Then, add the results from the first two steps together to calculate the total estimated event -related audience spending. Finally, the ratios of economic impact per $100,000 in direct spending can then be used to determine the total economic impact of the total estimated audience spending. R AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts d Economic Prosperity 5 I ; IndianIN'le'dian of Similar Study Regions- 10o,000 to -749,999 National -Median i Full -Time Equivalent Jobs 2.03 2.53 2.46 Resident Household Income 536,058 $53,212 $52,101 Local Government Revenue 53,738 $4,418 $4,449 State Government Revenue $6,380 $5,213 55,692 R AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts d Economic Prosperity 5 An Example of How to Use the Audience Spending Calculator Tables (on the preceding page): An administrator wants to determine the total economic impact of the 25,000 total attendees to his/her organization's nonprofit arts and cultural events on full-time equivalent (FTE) employment in Indian River County. The administrator would: 1. Multiply the total attendance by the percentage of attendees that are residents; 2. Multiply the result of step I by the average per person event -related expenditure for residents; 3. Multiply the total attendance by the percentage of attendees that are nonresidents; 4. Multiply the result of step 3 by the average per person event -related expenditure for nonresidents; 5. Sum the results of steps 2 and 4 to calculate the total estimated event -related audience spending; 6. Divide the resulting total estimated audience spending by 100,000; and 7. Multiply that figure by the FTE employment ratio per $100,000 for Indian River County. Thus, 25,000 times 74.9% (from Table 8 on the preceding page) equals 18,725; 18,725 times $18.90 (from Table 8) equals $353,903; 25,000 times 25.1% (from Table 8) equals 6,275; 6,275 times $45.36 equals $284,634; $353,903 plus $284,634 equals $638,537, $638,537 divided by 100,000 equals 6.39; 6.39 times 2.03 (from the top row of data on Table 9 on the preceding page) equals a total of 13.0 full-time equivalent jobs supported (both directly and indirectly) within Indian River County by that nonprofit arts and cultural organization. Using the same procedure, the estimate can be calculated for resident household income as well as for local and state government revenue. Making Comparisons with Similar Study Regions For the purpose of this analysis and unique report, the geographic region being studied is defined as Indian River County, Florida. According to the most recent data available from the U.S. Census Bureau, the population of Indian River County was estimated to be 144,755 during 2015. For comparison purposes, 458 pages of detailed data tables containing the study results for all 341 participating study regions are located in Appendix B of the National Statistical Report. The data tables are stratified by population, making it easy to compare the findings for Indian River County to the findings for similarly populated study regions (as well as any other participating study regions that are considered valid comparison cohorts). The National Summary Report and National Brochure are available both by download (free) and hardcopy (for purchase). The National Statistical Report (more than 500 pages in length) is available by download only. All documents and resources can be found at www.AmericansForTheArts.org/Economiclmpact. AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 17 I-�3 "In Rhode Island, we know cultural excellence is crucial to economic development and the success of businesses large and small. Arts -related industries create jobs, attract investments, and enhance tourism—the economic impact of arts organizations is significant. The arts also play a role in promoting the health and welfare of our military members which makes our communities and our state stronger." Rhode Island Lieutenant Governor Dan McKee Chair, National Lt. Governors Association 18 AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 About This Study This Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 study was conducted by Americans for the Arts to document the economic impact of the nonprofit arts and culture industry in 341 communities and regions (113 cities, 115 counties, 81 multi -city or multi -county regions, 20 states, and 12 individual arts districts)—representing all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. The diverse local communities range in population (1,500 to four million) and type (rural to urban). The study focuses solely on nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and their audiences. The study excludes spending by individual artists and the for-profit arts and entertainment sector (e.g., Broadway or the motion picture industry). Detailed expenditure data were collected from 14,439 arts and culture organizations and 212,691 of their attendees. The project economists, from the Georgia Institute of Technology, customized input- output economic models for each participating study region to provide specific and reliable economic impact data about their nonprofit arts and culture industry: full-time equivalent jobs, household income, and local and state government revenue. The 250 Local, Regional, and Statewide Study Partners Americans for the Arts published a Call for Participants in 2015 seeking communities interested in participating in the Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 study. Of the more than 300 potential partners that expressed interest, 250 local, regional, and statewide organizations agreed to participate and complete four participation criteria: identify and code the universe of nonprofit arts and cultural organizations in their study region; assist researchers with the collection of detailed financial and attendance data from those organizations; conduct audience -intercept surveys at cultural events; and pay a modest cost-sharing fee (no community was refused participation for an AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 inability to pay). Thirty of the 250 partners included multiple study regions as part of their AEP5 participation (e.g., a county as well as a specific city located within the county). As a result, the 250 local, regional, and statewide organizations represent a total of 341 participating study regions. The Cultural Council of Indian River County responded to the 2015 Call for Participants, and agreed to complete the required participation criteria. Surveys of Nonprofit Arts and Cultural ORGANIZATIONS Each of the 250 study partners identified the universe of nonprofit arts and cultural organizations that are located in their region(s) using the Urban Institute's National Taxonomy of Exempt Entity (NTEE) coding system as a guideline. The NTEE system— developed by the National Center for Charitable Statistics at the Urban Institute—is a definitive classification system for nonprofit organizations recognized as tax exempt by the Internal Revenue Code. This system divides the entire universe of nonprofit organizations into 10 Major categories, including "Arts, Culture, and Humanities." The Urban Institute reports that approximately 100,000 nonprofit arts and cultural organizations were registered with the IRS in 2015. The following NTEE "Arts, Culture, and Humanities" subcategories were included in this study: K • A01 —A] I iances and Advocacy • A02 — Management and Technical Assistance • A03 — Professional Societies and Associations • A05 — Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis • Al 1 — Single Organization Support • Al2 — Fund Raising and Fund Distribution • A19 — Support (not elsewhere classified) • A20 — Arts and Culture (general) • A23 — Cultural and Ethnic A%vareness • A24 — Folk Arts • A25 — Arts Education • A26 — Arts and Humanities Councils and Agencies • A27 — Community Celebrations • A30 — Media and Communications (general) • A31 — Film and Video • A32 — Television • A33 — Printing and Publishing • A34 — Radio • A40 — Visual Arts (general) • A50 — Museums (general) • A51 —Art Museums • A52 — Children's Museums • A53 — Folk Arts Museums • A54 — History Museums • A56 — Natural History and Natural Science Museums • A57 — Science and Technology Museums • A60 — Performing Arts (general) • A61 — Performing Arts Centers • A62 — Dance • A63 — Ballet • A65 — Theatre • A68 — Music • A69 — Symphony Orchestras • A6A — Opera • A613 — Singing and Choral Groups • A6C — Bands and Ensembles • A6E — Performing Arts Schools • A70 — Humanities (general) • A80 — Historical Organizations (general) • A82 — Historical Societies and Historic Preservation • A84 —Commemorative Events • A90 — Arts Services (general) • A99 — Arts, Culture, and Humanities (miscellaneous) In addition to the organization types listed above, the study partners were encouraged to include other types of eligible organizations if they play a 20 .substantial role in the cultural life of the community or if their primary purpose is to promote participation in, appreciation for, and understanding of the visual, performing, folk, literary arts, and/or media arts. These include government-owned and government - operated cultural facilities and institutions, municipal arts agencies and councils, private community arts organizations, unincorporated arts groups, living collections (such as zoos, aquariums, and botanical gardens), university presenters and cultural facilities, and arts programs that are embedded under the umbrella of a nonarts organization or facility (such as a community center or church). In short, if it displays the characteristics of a nonprofit arts and cultural organization, it is included. With rare exception, for- profit businesses and individual artists are excluded from this study. To collect the required financial and attendance information from eligible organizations, researchers implemented a multipronged data collection process. Americans for the Arts partnered with DataArts to collect detailed budget and attendance information about each organization's fiscal year that ended in 2015. DataArts' Cultural Data Profile (CDP) is a unique system that enables arts and cultural organizations to enter financial, programmatic, and operational data into a standardized online form. To reduce the survey response burden on participating organizations, and because the CDP collects the detailed information required for this economic impact analysis, researchers used confidential CDP data as the primary organizational data collection mechanism for the Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 study. This primary data collection effort was - supplemented with an abbreviated one-page paper version of the survey that was administered to organizations that did not respond to the CDP survey. Nationally, information was collected from 14,439 eligible organizations about their fiscal year 2015 expenditures, event attendance, in-kind contributions, and volunteerism. Responding organizations had AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 budgets ranging from $0 to $785 million (Smithsonian Institution). Response rates for the 341 communities ranged from. 9.5 percent to 100 percent and averaged 54.0 percent. It is important to note that each study region's results are based solely on the actual survey data collected. No estimates have been made to account for nonparticipating eligible organizations. Therefore, the less -than -100 percent response rates suggest an understatement of the economic impact findings in most of the individual study regions. In Indian River County, 10 of the 46 eligible nonprofit arts and cultural organizations identified by the Cultural Council of Indian River County participated in this study—a participation rate of 21.7 percent Surveys of Nonprofit Arts and Cultural AUDIENCES Audience -intercept surveying, a common and accepted research method, was conducted in all 341 of the study regions to measure event -related spending by nonprofit arts and culture audiences. Patrons were asked to complete a short survey while attending an event. Nationally, a total of 212,691 attendees completed a valid survey. The randomly selected respondents provided itemized expenditure data on attendance -related activities such as meals, retail shopping (e.g., gifts and souvenirs), local transportation, and lodging. Data were collected throughout 2016 (to account for seasonality) as well as at a broad range of both paid and free events (a night at the opera will typically yield more audience spending than a weekend children's theater production or a free community music festival, for example). The survey respondents provided information about the entire party with whom they were attending the event. With an overall average travel party size of 2.56 people, these data actually represent the spending patterns of more than 544,489 cultural attendees. AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 In Indian River County, a total of 768 valid audience -intercept surveys were collected from attendees to arts and cultural performances, events, and exhibits during 2016. Economic Analysis A common theory of community growth is that an area must export goods and services if it is to prosper economically. This theory is called economic -base theory, and it depends on dividing the economy into two sectors: the export sector and the local sector. Exporters, such as automobile manufacturers, hotels, and department stores, obtain income from customers outside of the community. This "export income" then enters the local economy in the form of salaries, purchases of materials, dividends, and so forth, and becomes income to residents. Much of it is respent locally; some, however, is spent for goods imported from outside of the community. The dollars respent locally have an economic impact as they continue to circulate through the local economy. This theory applies to arts organizations as well as to other producers. Studying Economic Impact Using Input -Output Analysis To derive the most reliable economic impact data, input-output analysis is used to measure the impact of expenditures by nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and their audiences. This is a highly - regarded type of economic analysis that has been the basis for two Nobel Prizes. The models are systems of mathematical equations that combine statistical methods and economic theory in an area of study called econometrics. They trace how many times a dollar is respent within the local economy before it leaks out, and it quantifies the economic impact of each round of spending. This form of economic analysis is well suited for this study because it can be customized specifically to each study region. To complete the analysis for Indian River County, project economists customized an input-output 21 model based on the local dollar flow among 533 finely detailed industries within the unique economy of Indian River County. This was accomplished by using detailed data on employment, incomes, and government revenues provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce (County Business Patterns, the Regional Economic Information System, and the Survey of State and Local Finance), local tax data (sales taxes, property taxes, and miscellaneous local option taxes), as well as the survey data from the responding nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and their audiences. The Input -Output Process The input-output model is based on a table of 533 finely detailed industries showing local sales and purchases. The local and state economy of each community is researched so the table can be customized for each community. The basic purchase patterns for local industries are derived from a similar table for the U.S. economy for 2012 (the latest detailed data available from the U.S. Department of Commerce). The table is first reduced to reflect the.unique size and industry mix of the local economy, based on data from County Business Patterns and the Regional Economic Information System of the U.S. Department of Commerce. It is then adjusted so that only transactions with local businesses are recorded in the inter -industry part of the table. This technique compares supply and demand and estimates the additional imports or exports required to make total supply equal total demand. The resulting table shows the detailed sales and purchase patterns of the local industries. The 533 -industry table is then aggregated to reflect the general activities of 32 industries plus local households, creating a total of 33 industries. To trace changes in the economy, each column is converted to show the direct requirements per dollar of gross output for each sector. This direct -requirements table represents the "recipe" for producing the output of each industry. 22 The economic impact figures for Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 were computed using what is called an "iterative" procedure. This process uses the sum of a power series to approximate the solution to the economic model. This is what the process looks like in matrix algebra: T= IX+AX+A'-X+A'X+...+A"X. T is the solution, a column vector of changes in each industry's outputs caused by the changes represented in the column vector X. A is the 33 by 33 direct - requirements matrix. This equation is used to trace the direct expenditures attributable to nonprofit arts organizations and their audiences. A multiplier effect table is produced that displays the results of this equation. The total column is T. The initial expenditure to be traced is IX (I is the identity matrix, which is operationally equivalent to the number 1 in ordinary algebra). Round I is AX, the result of multiplying the matrix A by the vector X (the outputs required of each supplier to produce the goods and services purchased in the initial change under study). Round 2 is A2X, which is the result of multiplying the matrix A by Round I (it answers the same question applied to Round 1: "What are the outputs required of each supplier to produce the goods and services purchased in Round 1 of this chain of events?"). Each of columns I through 12 in the multiplier effects table represents one of the elements in the continuing but diminishing chain of expenditures on the right side of the equation. Their sum, T, represents the total production required in the local economy in response to arts activities. Calculation of the total impact of the nonprofit arts on the outputs of other industries (T) can now be converted to impacts on the final incomes to residents by multiplying the outputs produced by the ratios of household income to output and employment to output. Thus, the employment impact of changes in outputs due to arts expenditures is calculated by multiplying elements in the column of total outputs AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 by the ratio of employment to output for the 32 industries in the region. Changes in household incomes, local government revenues, and state government revenues due to nonprofit arts expenditures are similarly transformed. The same process is also used to show the direct impact on incomes and revenues associated with the column of direct local expenditures. A comprehensive description of the methodology used to complete the national study is available at www.AmericansForTheArts.org/Economicimpact. AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts R Economic Prosperity 5 23 24 "Americans for the Arts' Arts and Economic Prosperity 5 study is an invaluable tool for Guilford County and counties across the nation. The data it has collected and analyzed provide an unparalleled understanding of the influence of the arts on the economy, locally and nationally. It is vital that we continue to measure the impact of the arts on our economy to show our constituents and the nation its value. We are grateful for the work Americans for the Arts does to help us show what an important asset the arts are in the areas of education and health, both physical and mental, and as an economic driver." Kay Cashion, Commissioner, Guilford County, N.C. Chair, National Association of Counties Arts & Culture Commission AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 Frequently Used Terms Cultural Tourism Travel directed toward experiencing the arts, heritage, and special character of a place. Direct Economic Impact A measure of the economic effect of the initial expenditure within a community. For example, when the symphony pays its players, each musician's salary, the associated government taxes, and full-time equivalent employment status represent the direct economic impact. Direct Expenditures The first round of expenditures in the economic cycle. A paycheck from the symphony to the violin player and a ballet company's purchase of dance shoes are examples of direct expenditures. Econometrics The process of using statistical methods and economic theory to develop a system of mathematical equations that measures the flow of dollars behveen local industries. The input-output model developed for this study is an example of an econometric model. Econometrician An economist who designs, builds, and maintains econometric models. Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) Jobs A term that describes the total amount of labor employed. Economists measure FTE jobs—not the total number of employees—because it is a more accurate measure of total employment. It is a manager's discretion to hire one full-time employee, two half-time employees, four quarter -time employees, etc. Almost always, more people are affected than are reflected in the number of FTE jobs reported due to the abundance of part-time employment, especially in the nonprofit arts and culture industry. Indirect and Induced Economic Impact This study measures the economic impact of the arts using a methodology that enables economists to track how many times a dollar is respent within the local economy, and thus to measure the economic impact generated by each round of spending. When a theater company purchases paint from the local hardware store, there is a measurable economic effect of that initial expenditure within a community. However, the economic benefits typically do not end there, because the hardware store uses some of its income to pay the clerk that sold the paint, as well as to pay its electric bill and to re -stock the shelves. The indirect and induced economic impacts are the effects of the subsequent rounds of spending by businesses and individuals, respectively. (See the example on Page 5 of this report.) AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 25 Input -Output Analysis A system of mathematical equations that combines statistical methods and economic theory in an area of economic study called econometrics. Economists use this model (occasionally called an inter -industry model) to measure how many times a dollar is respent in, or "ripples" through, a community before it "leaks out' of the local economy by being spent non -locally (see Leakage below). The model is based on a matrix that tracks the dollar flow among 533 finely detailed industries in each community. It allows researchers to determine the economic impact of local spending by nonprofit arts and cultural organizations on jobs, household income, and government revenue. Leakage The money that community members spend outside of the local economy. This non -local spending has no economic impact within the community. A ballet company purchasing shoes from a non -local manufacturer is an example of leakage. If the shoe company were local, the expenditure would remain within the community and create another round of spending by the shoe company. Multiplier (often called Economic Activity Multiplier) An estimate of the number of times that a dollar changes hands within the community before it leaks out of the community (for example, the theater pays the actor, the actor spends money at the grocery store, the grocery store pays its cashier, and so on). This estimate is quantified as one number by which all expenditures are multiplied. For example, if the arts are a $10 million industry and a multiplier of three is used, then it is estimated that these arts organizations have a total economic impact of $30 million. The convenience of a multiplier is that it is one simple number; its shortcoming, however, is its reliability. Users rarely note that the multiplier is developed by making gross estimates of the industries within the local economy with no allowance for differences in the characteristics of those industries, usually resulting in an overestimation of the economic impact. In contrast, the input-output model employed in Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 is a type of economic analysis tailored specifically to each community and, as such, provides more reliable and specific economic impact results. Resident Household Income (often called Personal Income) The salaries, wages, and entrepreneurial income residents earn and use to pay for food, mortgages, and other living expenses. It is important to note that resident household income is not just salary. When a business receives money, for example, the owner usually takes a percentage of the profit, resulting in income for the owner. Revenue to Local and State Government Local and state government revenue is not derived exclusively from income, property, sales, and other taxes. It also includes license fees, utility fees, user fees, and filing fees. Local government revenue includes funds to city and county government, schools, and special districts. 26 AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 Frequently Asked Questions How were the 341 participating communities and regions selected? In 2015, Americans for the Arts published a Call for Participants for communities interested in participating in the Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 study. Of the more than 300 participants that expressed interest, 250 agreed to participate and complete four participation criteria: (1) identify and code the universe of nonprofit arts and cultural organizations in their study region; (2) assist researchers with the collection of detailed financial and attendance data from those organizations; (3) conduct audience -intercept surveys at cultural events; and (4) pay a modest cost-sharing fee (no community was refused participation for an inability to pay). Thirty of the 250 partners included multiple regions as part of their participation (e.g., a county as well as a city located within the county); as a result, the 250 local, regional, and statewide partners represent a total of 341 participating study regions. How were the eligible nonprofit arts organizations in each community selected? Local partners attempted to identify their universe of nonprofit arts and cultural organizations using the Urban Institute's National Taxonomy of Exempt Entity (NTEE) codes as a guideline. Eligible organizations included those whose primary purpose is to promote appreciation for and understanding of the visual, performing, folk, and media arts. Government-owned and government -operated cultural facilities and institutions, municipal arts agencies and councils, private community arts organizations, unincorporated arts groups, living collections (such as zoos, aquariums, and botanical gardens), university presenters and cultural facilities, and arts programs that are embedded under the umbrella of a non -arts organization or facility (such as a hospital or church) also were included if they play a substantial role in the cultural life of the community. For-profit businesses and individual artists are excluded from this study. What type of economic analysis was done to determine the study results? An input-output economic analysis was customized for each of the participating study regions to determine the economic impact its nonprofit arts and cultural organizations and arts audiences. Americans for the Arts, which conducted the research, worked with highly regarded economists to design the input-output models. What other information was collected in addition to the arts surveys? In addition to detailed expenditure data provided by the surveyed organizations and cultural attendees, researchers and economists collected extensive wage, labor, tax, and commerce data provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce (County Business Patterns, the Regional Economic Information System, and the Survey of State and Local Finance), as well as local and state tax data for use in the input-output analyses. Why doesn't this study use a multiplier? When many people hear about an economic impact study, they expect the result to be quantified in what is often called a multiplier or an economic activity multiplier. The economic activity multiplier is an estimate of the number of times a dollar changes hands within the community (e.g., a theater pays its actor, the actor spends money at the grocery store, the grocery store pays the cashier, and so on). It is quantified as one number by which expenditures are multiplied. The convenience of the multiplier is that it is one simple number. Users rarely note, however, that the multiplier is developed by making gross estimates of the industries within the local economy AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 27 and does not allow for differences in the characteristics of those industries. Using an economic activity multiplier usually results in an overestimation of the economic impact and therefore lacks reliability. Why are the admissions expenses excluded from the analysis of audience spending? Researchers assume that any admissions dollars paid by event attendees are typically collected as revenue for the organization that is presenting the event. The organization then spends those dollars. The admissions paid by audiences are excluded because those dollars are captured in the operating budgets of the participating nonprofit arts and cultural organizations. This methodology avoids "double -counting" those dollars in the analysis. How is the economic impact of arts and culture organizations different from other industries? Any time money changes hands there is a measurable economic impact. Social service organizations, libraries, and all entities that spend money have an economic impact. What makes the economic impact of arts and culture organizations unique is that, unlike most other industries, they induce large amounts of related spending by their audiences. For example, when patrons attend a performing arts event, they may purchase dinner at a restaurant, eat dessert after the show, and return home and pay the baby-sitter. These expenditures have a positive and measurable impact on the economy. Will my local legislators believe these results? Yes, this study makes a strong argument to legislators, but you may need to provide them with some extra help. It will be up to the user of this report to educate the public about economic impact studies in general and the results of this study in particular. The user may need to explain (1) the study methodology used; (2) that economists created an input-output model for each community and region in the study; and (3) the difference between input- output analysis and a multiplier. The good news is that as the number of economic impact studies completed by arts organizations and other special interest areas increases, so does the sophistication of community leaders whose influence these studies are meant to affect. Today, most decision makers want to know what methodology is being used and how and where the data were gathered. You can be confident that the input-output analysis used in this study is a highly -regarded model in the field of economics (the basis of two Nobel Prizes in economics). However, as in any professional field, there is disagreement about procedures, jargon, and the best way to determine results. Ask 12 artists to define art and you may get 12 answers; expect the same of economists. You may meet an economist who believes that these studies should be done differently (for example, a cost -benefit analysis of the arts). How can a community not participating in the Arts and Economic Prosperity 5 study apply these results? Because of the variety of communities studied and the rigor with which the Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 study was conducted, nonprofit arts and cultural organizations located in communities that were not part of the study can estimate their local economic impact. Estimates can be derived.by using the Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 Calculator (found at www.AmericansForTheArts.org/Economiclmpact). Additionally, users will find sample PowerPoint presentations, press releases, Op -Ed, and other strategies for proper application of their estimated economic impact data. 28 AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 Acknowledgments Americans for the Arts expresses its gratitude to the many people and organizations who made Arts & Economic Prosperity 5: The Economic Impact of Nonprofit Arts and Cultural Organizations and Their Audiences in Indian River County possible and assisted in its development, coordination, and production. A study of this size cannot be completed without the collaboration of many partnering organizations. Generous funding for this project was provided by the Cultural Council of Indian River County, which also served as the local project partner and as such was responsible for the local implentation and data collection requirements of this customized analysis for Indian River County. Special thanks to the John D. and Catherine T. Indian River County's Participating MacArthur Foundation, the Barr Foundation, and The Nonprofit Arts and Cultural Ruth Lilly Fund of Americans for the Arts for their Organizations financial support of the national implementation of This study could not have been completed without the Arts & Economic Prosperity 5. Finally, each of our 250 local, regional, and statewide research partners contributed time and/or financial support toward the completion of this national study. We thank each and every one of them for committing the time and resources necessary to achieve success. A study of this magnitude is a total organizational effort; appreciation is extended to the entire board and staff of Americans for the Arts. The research department responsible for producing this study includes Randy Cohen, Ben Davidson, Isaac Fitzsimons, and Graciela Kahn. AMERICANS FOR THE ARTS I Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 cooperation of the 10 nonprofit arts and cultural organizations in Indian River County, listed below, that provided detailed financial and event attendance information about their organization. Ballet Vero Beach Inc. Cultural Council Of Indian River Count}; Emerson Center; Mckee Botanical Gardens; Riverside Theatre; Theatre - Go -Round; Vero Beach Art Club; Vero Beach Museum Of Art, Vero Beach Opera; and Vero Beach Theatre Guild. Indian River County's Participating Cultural Event Attendees Additionally, this study could not have been completed without the cooperation of the 768 arts and cultural audience members who generously took the time to complete the audience -intercept survey while attending a performance, event, or exhibit within Indian River County during calendar year 2016. 29 T, I %�� The following national organizations partner with Americans for the Arts to CECP Hcas1\TACO L LEAGUE AL help public- and private -sector leaders ;, NIGA _ FlHEacroo� � OF CITIES -.^`!Yf understand the economic and social !! . benefits that the arts bring to their communities, states, and the nation. ? DESTINATIONSn(Q��—�1/� ICMA <0> INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL a:'eCv`,fG1 N r SECTOR Cover: Andrew Shurtleft Photography ' (Clockwise from. Top) Concert for Miami, Knight Concert Hall, Miami -Dade, FL.; Photos from Uw Browurd 100 i 'InsideOut' campaign 'Crea[ives Making a Difference in f! $ � /�{�� ii e 1 NATIONAL CONF[0.ENCE Hdlyw»od'-Presented by theCanmuniyRedevaloprnerNGrantmakersintheArts 1i11II •ESTATE LEGISLATURES 90 Agency ofHaII)Avodand supported bythe Downtown Supporting a Cteadve America COUNCILair F0UNDAT IONS Hollywood Mural Project and the Art and Cultural Center of re, F.— f , A" i" , a"` Hottywbod, FL Photo by Jill Weisberg.; The Pod, D Paso Museums & Cultural Affairs Department, TX. Photo by len Lewin.; Dancer at outdoor performance. Fulton County Arts TF1 I: CON F E K E N C E BOARD Council, GA-. Photo byCGC Studios. Trus.ed fnsixhu for Businessvtorluvi�de 1000 Vermont Avenue, NW, 611 Floor Washington, DC 20005 1 202.371.2830 1 research@artsusa.org I #AEP5 www.AmericansForTheArts.org PROCLAMATION HONORING JOHN D URAN ON HIS RETIREMENT FROM INDIAN RIVER COUNTYBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES/FIRE RESCUE WHEREAS, John Duran retired from Indian River County Fire Rescue effective December 29, 2017; and WHEREAS, John, Duran began his career on June 16, 1986, as a. -part-time South County Dispatcher and became a fulltime Firefighter on January 8, 1988? In 1991 he obtained his EMT certification; in 2004 he became a Fire and Life Safety Inspector reaching Lieutenant rank in 2005, and in 101.5 was promoted to the position of Fire and Life Safety Battalion Chief in which position he served until: his retirement WHEREAS, John Duran has served this County and the Public with. distinction and selflessness. During his thirty-one years of service, he has received letters of commendation and gratitude and he has obtained numerous certifications. He has been dedicated and his work has been greatly appreciated by his employer, his co- workers and the citizens of our community alike; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds John Duran's efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their gratitude for the dedicated service he has given to Indian River County for the last thirty-one years; and BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and stuff extend their sincerest wishes for success in his future endeavors. Adopted this 12th day of December 2017. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter O'Bryan, Chair an P2 PROCLAMATION HONORING BETTY DA VIS SCROGGS ON HER RETIREMENT FROM INDIANRIVER COUNTYBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE VEL OPMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION WHEREAS, Betty Davis Scroggs is retiring from the Indian River County Community Development Department effective December 29, 2017, and WHEREAS, Betty Davis Scroggs began her career with the Indian River County Planning Department on August 28, 1981, back when the Department was operating out of the Pocahontas Building downtown, giving her the distinction of being the longest serving current employee of the County at the time of her retirement. Betty was hired in 1981 as a Zoning Inspector, later retitled as Code Enforcement Officer, in which capacity Betty has served until retirement; and WHEREAS, Betty Davis Scroggs, since December 1998, has been a Certified Code Enforcement Professional, as certified through the Florida Association of Code Enforcement. In addition to her code enforcement training, experience, and professionalism, Betty developed expertise in landscape grades and standards, and used that expertise in enforcing landscape standards throughout the county, for the betterment of the community; and WHEREAS, Betty Davis Scroggs has served this County and the Public with distinction and selflessness. During her thirty six (36) plus years of service, she has been dedicated, and her work has been greatly appreciated by her employer, citizens, and co-workers alike, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board applauds Betty Davis Scroggs' efforts on behalf of the County, and the Board wishes to express their deepest gratitude for the dedicated service she has given to Indian River Countyfor the last thirty six (36) years. BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that the Board of County Commissioners and staff extend their sincerest wishes for success in her future endeavors. Acknowledged this 12th day of December 2017. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman P3 8.A. JEFFREY R. SMITH, CPA, CGFO, CGMA Clerk of Circuit Court & Comptroller Finance Department 1801 27'" Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ELISSA NAGY, FINANCE DIRECTOR THRU: JEFFREY R. SMITH, COMPTROLLER DATE: November 30, 2017 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHECKS AND ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS November 24, 2017 to November 30, 2017 In compliance with Chapter 136.06, Florida Statutes, all checks and electronic payments issued by the Board of County Commissioners are to be recorded in the Board minutes. Approval is requested for the attached lists of checks and electronic payments, issued by the Comptroller's office, for the time period of November 24, 2017 to November 30, 2017. 0 4 CHECKS WRITTEN TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 360771 11/28/2017 PAUL CARONE 3.887.00 360772 11/28/2017 GREENE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP LTD 31772.96 360773 11/28/2017 LINDSEY GARDENS LTD 751.00 360774 11/28/2017 WILLIE C REAG,AN 1,350.00 360775 11/28/2017 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT •52,747.50 360776 11/28/2017 MEDICAL EXAMINERS OFFICE 35,224.16 360777 11/28/2017 VICTIM ASSISTANCE, PROGRAM 5.532.66 360778 11/28/2017 ROGER l NgCOSIA 1,500.00 360779 11/28/2017 CITY OF VERO BEACH 2,108.02 360780 11/28/2017 CITY OF VERO BEACH 11,787.50 360781 11/28/2017 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 6.961.36 360782 11/28/2017 LARRY STALEY 593.00 360783 .11/28/2017 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 1.952.00 360784 11/28/2017 VERO CLUB PARTNERS LTD 1,981.00 360785 11/28/2017 DAVID SPARKS 1,407.00 360786 11/28/2017 THE PALMS AT VERO BEACH 1,102.00 360787 11/28/2017 ED SCHLITT LC 2,832.00 360788 11/28/2017 JOHN OLIVIERA 716.00 360789 11/28/2017 ARTHUR PRUETT 484.00 360790 11/28/2017 JOSEPH LOZADA 677.00 360791 11/28/2617 MICHAEL JAHOLKOWSKI 547.00 360792 11/28/2017 LUCY B HENDRICKS 761.00 360793 11/28/2017 SYLVESTER MC INTOSH 365.00 360794 11/28/2017 PAULA WHIDDON 553.00 360795 11/28/2017 JAMES W DAVIS 372.00 360796' 11/28/2017 NITA EZELL 609.00 360797 .11/28/2017 MISS INC OF THE TREASURE COAST 2.174.00 360798 11/28/2017 DANIEL CORY MARTIN 2,680.00 360799 11/28/2017 PAULA ROGERS & ASSOCIATES INC 601.00 360800 11/28/2017 FIVE STAR PROPERTY HOLDING LLC 847.00 360801 11/28/2017 MARK BAER 3,544.00 360802 11/28/2017 JUAN CHAVES 706.60 360803 11/28/2017 REID REALTY 606.00 360804 11/28/2017 MELISSA CAMARATA 838.00 360805 11/28/2017 FOUNDATION FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL. 758.00 360806 11/28/2017 INDIANTOWN NON-PROFIT HOUSING INC 670.00 360807 11/28/2017 AUGUSTUS B FORT JR 581.00 360808 11/28/2017 H&H SHADOWBROOK LLC 568.00 360809 11/28/2017 VERO BEACH PLACE LLC 5.242.00 360810 11/28/2017 GNS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 1,920.00 360811 11/28/2017 COALITION FOR ATTAINABLE HOMES INC 1;416.00 360812 1028/2017 HELPING HANDS REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT CO 2,850.00 360813 11/28/2017 1135 RENTALS LLC 2,846.00 360814 11/28/2017 STEVEN J BERGAMINO 850.00 360815 11/28/2017 BLUE DRAGON MANAGEMENT LLC 1.100.00 360816 11/28/2017 MCLAUGHLIN PROPERTIES LLC 536.00 360817 11/28/2017 HOWARD R BRENNAN 556.00 360818 11/28/2017 NKW PIP 14OLDINGS I LLC 3.154.00 360819 11/28/2017 MAXIPLEX LLC 5.713.00 360820 11/30/2017 PORT CONSOLIDATED INC 38,820.38 360821 11/30/2017 JORDAN MOWER INC 467.58 360822 11/30/2017 TEN -8 FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 2,272.59 360823 11/30/2017 RANGER CONSTRUCTION IND INC 622.20 360824 11/30/2017 VERO CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 139.20 360825 11/30/2017 RICOH USA INC 335.39 360826 11/30/2017 VELDE FORD INC 90.67 360827 11/30/2017 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 121.64 360828 11/30/2017 AT&T WIRELESS 794.84 i 1 � I 5 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 360829 11/30/2017 DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC 6,551.83 360830 11/30/2017 SEWELL HARDWARE CO INC 21.62 360831 11/30/2017 L --Z BREW COFFEE & BOTTLE WATER SVC 12.49 360832 11/30/2017 GRAINGER 263.97 360833 11/30/2017 KELLY TRACTOR CO 4.626.95 360834 11/30/2017 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 973.86 360835 11/30/2017 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY CO 2,939.57 360836 11/30/2017 MY RECEPTIONIST INC 244.31 360837 11/30/2017 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 1,562.45 360838 11/30/2017 AMERIGAS EAGLE PROPANE LP 1,860.99 360839 11/30/2017 HACH CO 1,530.98 360840 11/30/2017 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC 107.15 360841 11/30/2017 KSM ENGINEERING & TESTING INC 310.00 360842 11/30/2017 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,104.60 360843 11/30/2017 PETES CONCRETE 10,750.00 360844 11/30/2017 ECOTECH CONSULTANTS INC 4,554.00 360845 11/30/2017 TIRESOLES OF BROWARD INC 6,116.96 360846 11/30/2017 CARTER ASSOCIATES INC 8,046.14 360847 11/30/2017 THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 1,988.84 360848 11/30/2017 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 4,527.46 360849 11/30/2017 MIDWEST TAPE LLC. 714.04 360850 11/30/2017 MWI CORP 1,167.57 360851 11/30/2017 PALM TRUCK CENTERS INC 180.16 360852 11/30/2017 PENWORTHY COMPANY 854.91 360853 11/30/2017 GO COASTAL INC 257.35 360854 11/30/2017 SUNSHINE REHABILATION CENTER OF IRC INC 1,050.00 360855 11/30/2017 CITY OF VERO BEACH 19,376.00 360856 11/30/2017 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 73.42 360857 11/30/2017 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 53,122.55 360858 11/30/2017 JANITORIAL DEPOT OF AMERICA INC 182.02 360859 11/30/2017 HUMANE SOCIETY 22,880.00 360860 11/30/2017 PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS 66.51 360861 11/30/2017 ACUSHNETCOMPANY 1,441.94 360862 11/30/2017 INTERNATIONAL GOLF MAINTENANCE INC 88,1.48.43 360863 11/30/2017 GEAR FOR SPORTS 1NTL INC 291.52 360864 11/30/2017 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS INC 268.83 360865 11/30/2017 WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 415.64 360866 11/30/2017 ELIZABETH MARTIN 153.67 360867 11/30/2017 CITY OF SEBASTIAN 21,713.29 360868 11/30/2017 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 53,419.44 360869 11/30/2017 FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 20,168.31 360870 11/30/2017 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 6,917.88 360871 11/30/2017 PHILLIP J MATSON 54.18 360872 11/30/2017 STATE ATTORNEY 1,838.57 360873 11/30/2017 CITY OF FELLSMERE 12.93 360874 11/30/2017 CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PALM BCH 2,420.05 360875 11/30/2017 STRUNK FUNERAL HOMES & CREMATORY 425.00 360876 11/30/2017 TOCOMA RUBBER STAMP & MARKING SYSTEM 40.39 360877 11/30/2017 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 650.00 360878 11/30/2017 FLORIDA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 650.00 360879 11/30/2017 CENTRAL FLORIDA PRIMA 25.00 360880 11/30/2017 TRANSPORTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS 3,310.00 360881 11/30/2017 CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FL 1,000.00 360882 11/30/2017 PINNACLE GROVE LTD 400.00 360883 11/30/2017 FLORIDA ASSOC OF CODE ENFORCEMENT 35.00 360884 11/30/2017 RUSSELL PAYNE INC 1,742.79 360885 11/30/2017 TRANE US INC 10,914.30 360886 11/30/2017 CELICO PARTNERSHIP 1.39 360887 11/30/2017 ANIXTER INC 404.60 360888 11/30/2017 VAN WAL INC 128.00 i i P6 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AA10UNT 360889 11/30/2017 BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS 625.00 360890 11/30/2017 BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS 3,840.67 360891 11/30/2017 ALAN HILL 67.00 360892 11/30/2017 PARGAS 356.75 360893 11%30/2017 JACKS COMPLETE TREE SERVICE 400.00 360894 11/30/2017 MBV ENGINEERING INC 2,295.00 360895 11/30/2017 MBV ENGINEERING INC 5,543.25 360896 11/30/2017 MICHAEL ZITO 247.78 360897 11%30/2017 MASTELLER & MOLER INC 9,827.50 360898 11/30/2017 WHISPERING PALMS MHC LLC 410.00 36089,9 11/30/2017 GRAHAM CLAYBURN 111.77 360900 11/30/2017 PELICAN ISLES LP 430.00 360901 11/30/2017 GLOVER OIL COMPANY INC 2,309.25 360902 11/30/2017 BETTY BEATTY-HUNTER 153.13 360903 11/30/2017 GERELCOM INC 3,879.54 360904 11/30/2017 l ST FIRE & SECURITY INC 186.90 360905 11/30/2017 MUNICIPAL WATERWORKS INC 95.00 360906 11/30/2017 BACKFLOWGAGE.COM 90.00 360907 11/30/2017 SUMMERLINS MARINE CONST LLC 1,950.00 360908 11/30/2017 MOORE MEDICAL LLC 609.75 360909 11/30/2017 REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC 3,642.24 366910 11/30/2017 GUARDIAN COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2,500.00 360911 1-1/30/2017 PROQUEST LLC 5,560.00 360912 11/30/2017 K'S COMMERCIAL CLEANING. 16,309.08 360913 11/30/2017 WINSUPPLY OF VERO BEACH 206.00 360914 11/30/2017 HELPING ANIMALS LIVE -OVERCOME 14.00 360915 11/30/2017. CHEMETRJCS INC 243.81 360916 11/30/2017 HIGHERGROUND INC 786.74 360917 11/30/2017 NEWSOM OIL COMPANY 1,119.86 360918 11/30/2017 BRYAN KLASSEN 150.00 360919 11/30/2017 LOWES HOME.CENTERS INC 900.24 360920 11/30/2017 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC 1,410.40 360921 11/30/2017 BURNETT LIME CO INC 12,796.00 360922 11/30/2017 ATLANTIC ROOFING 11 OF VERO BEACH INC 18,453.00 360923 11/30/2017 TREASURE COAST TURF INC 3,975.00 360924 11/30/2017 CARMEN LEWIS 179.50 360925 11/30/2017 ROBERT DOERR UPHOLSTERY 1,500.00 360926 11/30/2017 STEWART & STEVENSON FDDA LLC 444.00 360927 11/30/2017 C E R SIGNATURE CLEANING 975.00 360928 11/30/2017 DEBORAH CUEVAS 24.00 360929 11/30/2017 CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS CORPORTATION 4,550.27 360930 11/30/2017 KATE P COTNER 388.12 360931 11/30/2017 WADE WILSON 310.00 360932 11/30/2017 SUSAN ADAMS 228.52 360933 11/30/2017 RDW QUALITY BUILDERS LLC 9,500.00 360934 11/30/2017 FORTILINE INC 3,833.00 360935 11/30/2017 FOUNDATION FOR AFFORDABLE RENTAL 152.00 360936 11/30/2017 FLORIDA PALLET LLC 1,440.00 360937 11%30/2017 FLORITURF SOD INC 205.00 360938 11/30/2017 ANDERSEN ANDRE CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC 5,510.50 360939 11/30/2017 RED THE UNIFORM TAILOR 6,786.00 360940 11/30/2017 CATHEDRAL CORPORATION 2,582.18 360941 11/30/2017 UNIFIRST CORPORATION 2,040.19 360942 11/30/2017 SCHUMACHER AUTOMOTIVE DELRAY LLC 80.90 360943 11/30/2017 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 132.51 360944 11/30/2017 BARSALOU VENTURES LLC 46.45 360945 11/30/2017 ADVANCE STORES COMPANY INCORPORATED 411.29 360946 11/30/2017 ADVANCE STORES COMPANY INCORPORATED 60.03 360947 11/30/2017 EGP DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 469.17 360948 11/30/2017 WURTH USA INC 43.75 P7 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 360949 11/30/2017 BLACK CLOVER ENTERPRISES LLC 451.00 360950 11/30/20.17 ZERO FRICTION LLC 630.33 360951 11/30/2017 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC 3.900.00 360952 11/30/2017 PEOPLE READY INC 10,877.44 360953 11/30/2017 COLE AUTO SUPPLY INC 5,570.95 360954 11/30/2017 MARISAALEXANDER 16.00 360955 11/30/2017 KIMBERLY RICCIARDONE 110.00 360956 11/30/2017 BETH NOLAN 65.00 360957 11/30/2017 THOMAS R PILIERO 56.00 360958 11/30/2017 APTIM COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING INC 2,024.82 360959 11/36/2017 STUART RUBBER STAMP & SIGN CO INC 77.97 360960 11/30/2017 CORE & MAIN LP 26,583.77 360961 11/30/2017 NEAL'POOLE 80.00 360962 11%30/2017 STATE INDUSTRIAL PRO -DUCTS CORP 258.75 360963 11/30/2017 DEANDREACUEVAS 24.00 360964 11/30/2017 TERRI YACLW PUTMAN 3,300.00 360965 11/30/2017 GOMEZ BROTHERS IRRIGATION LLC 675.00 360966 11/30/2017 WOERNER AGRIBUSINESS LLC 1,252.00 3609.67 11/30/2017 ADAM 1 INVESTMENT LLC 11365.46 360968 11/30/2017 ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS INC 46.44 360969 11/30/2017 LOUISE BARRETT 28.24 360970 11/30/2017 DAWN BENNETT 40.00 360971 11/30/2017 FLORIDA 140SPITAL ASSOCIATION 150.00 360972 11/30/2017 MOVING STATION LLC 88.60 360973 11/30/2017 OSCAR CISNEROS 98.75 360974 11/30/2017 EDGAR RAYA 232.50 360975 11/30/2017 FIRST CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE INC 100.00 360976 11/30/2017 CHARLES MCENTEE INC 200.00 360977 11/30/2017 PARADISE HOMES GROUP 500.00 360978 11/30/2017 GREG FARLESS 63.66 360979 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 66.08 .360980 11/30/2017 UTI L REFUNDS 20.79 360981 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 6.19 360982 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS .91.12 360983 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 65.66 360984 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 21.92 360985 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 81.31 360986 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 148.56 360987 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 1.58 360988 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 188.30 360989 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 24:29 360990 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 42.66 360991 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 145.43 360992 11/30/2017 UTiL REFUNfDS 61.03 360993 11/30/2017 UTILREFUNDS 44.18 360994 11/30/2017 UTILREFUNDS 1.92 360995 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 63.65 360996 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 5.74 360997 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 4.91 360998 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 34.78 360999 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 79.68 361000 11%30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 40.41 361061 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 68.06 361002 11/30%2017 UTIL REFUNDS 32.46 361003 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 40.27 361004 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 71.21 361005 11/30/2017 UTIL RE -FUNDS 48.77 361006 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 70.75 361007 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 17.43 361008 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 59.02 P8 TRANS NBR DATE VENDOR AMOUNT 361009 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 56.23 361010 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 22.59 361011 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 36.02 361012 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 30.54 361013 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 100.00 361014 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 58.12 361015 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 23.08 361016 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 11.79 361017 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 106.99 361018 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 231.50 361019 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 79.11 361020 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 212.86 361021 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 70.44 361022 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 38.42 361023 11/30/2017 UTIL REFUNDS 59.71 Grand Total: 805,030.78 P9 TRANS NBR 5568 Grand Total: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS - WIRE & ACH DATE VENDOR 11/28/2017 ELITE TITLE AMOUNT 22,560.00 22,560.00 P10 Cj•� r.. I INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Direct r FROM: James W. Ennis, P.E., PMP, County Engineer SUBJECT: Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2A with Masteller & Moler, Inc. IRC Courthouse Judges Security Upgrades DATE: November 27, 2017 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On November 15, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Continuing Contract for Professional Services with Masteller & Moler, Inc. and on November 4, 2014, approved an Extension and Amendment of the Continuing Contract. On May 3, 2017 Work Order No. 2 (now referred to as 2A) was approved by the Board of County Commissioners in the amount of $26,432.50. The purpose of this Amendment to Work Order No. 2A is to provide revisions to construction plans for depiction of an alternate conduit system for the pedestrian gate system for the Indian River County.ludges Security Upgrades. Amendment No.1 to Work Order No. 2 is for a total lump sum amount of $965.00, bringing the total for Work Order No. 2A to $27,397.50. FUNDING Funding is budgeted in the Court Facilities Management Fund/CourthouseJudges Security, Account No. 31522019-066510-16033 Optional SalesTax/Facilities Maint/Courthouse Judges Security in the amountof $965.00. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2A to Masteller & Moler, Inc. authorizing the above-mentioned professional services as outlined in the attached Scope of Services (Exhibit A) and requests the Board to authorize the Chairman to execute Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2A on their behalf for a total lump sum amount of $965.00. ATTACHMENTS Amendment No. 1 to Work Order No. 2A Exhibit A APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR DECEMBER 12, 2017 F:\Wblic Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1621 IRC Courthouse Judges Security Upgrades\1-Admin\Agenda Items\Amendment 1 to WO No. 2A\StaffReport - Amend 1 to WO 2A.doc P11 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 WORK ORDER NUMBER 2A IRC COURTHOUSE JUDGES SECURITY UPGRADE — IRC Project No. 1621 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES This Amendment 1 to Work Order Number 2A is entered into as of this _ day of 201J pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services, dated November 15, 2011, and that certain Extension and Amendment of Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 4 1 day of November, 2014 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Masteller & Moler, Inc. ("Consultant"). 1. The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth in existing Work Order Number 2, Effective Date August 16, 2016. 2. The COUNTY and the Consultant desire to amend this Work Order as set forth on Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "A", and within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit "A", all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. 3. From and after the Effective Date of this Amendment, the above -referenced Work Order is amended as set forth in this Amendment. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MASTELLER OLER, INC OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY By: By: Stephen E. oler, PE Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Title: Vice President BCC Approved Date: Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Dylan T. Reingold, County Attorney P12 M J MASTELLER & MOLER, INC. M, ~ CIVIL ENGINEERS EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT #1 TO WO # 2A - Masteller & Moller, Inc. IRC COURTHOUSE JUDGES SECURITY UPGRADE — IRC Project No. 1621 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES This Amendment is for work we performed to assist with New Conduit design and installation of the Courthouse Judges Security Upgrade Project. This work was considered beyond the scope of our original contract as requested by County. Scone of Work: Preparation of revised Construction Plans to depict an alternate conduit system for the pedestrian gate system to eliminate new conduit from entering the existing structure. We completed the above-described scope of work based on the Hourly Billing Rates listed in our Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services, dated November 15, 2011, and that certain Extension and Amendment of Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of this 4th day of November, 2014 (collectively referred to as the "Agreement"), by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Masteller & Moler, Inc. (°Consultant°). The hours and fees are as follows: Please note we initiated these services prior to approval of this Addendum in order to expedite the work at our own risk. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns Sincerely, T LER & MOLER, INC. S ephen E. Moler, PE Vice President SEIWcab FUe#1620 (1620HB AmendNol NewConduU 17-1003.docx) 165527 th Street, Suite 2 • Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: (772) 567-5300 • Fax: (772) 794-1106 mastmolr@bellsouth.net P13 Rates Hours Expended Total Principal / PE $ 175.00 2.5 $ 437.50 CAD / Designer $ 90.00 2.5 $ 225.00 Inspector $ 85.00 2.5 $ 212.50 Administrative $ 60.00 1.5 $ 90.00 Total $ 965.00 Please note we initiated these services prior to approval of this Addendum in order to expedite the work at our own risk. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns Sincerely, T LER & MOLER, INC. S ephen E. Moler, PE Vice President SEIWcab FUe#1620 (1620HB AmendNol NewConduU 17-1003.docx) 165527 th Street, Suite 2 • Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: (772) 567-5300 • Fax: (772) 794-1106 mastmolr@bellsouth.net P13 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E., Public Works Director FROM: Monique Filipiak, Land Acquisition Specialiste SUBJECT: Right -of -Way Acquisition — 660 Avenue Widening Project Owner: Franklin J. Tate & Donna Tate - 6780 69th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967 DATE: November 28, 2017 DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS Public Works is progressing with Right -of -Way acquisition for the planned improvements of 66th Avenue between 49th Street - 691' Street. The proposed improvements include widening the existing two-lane roadway to a four lane divided roadway, traffic signals, bridge replacement, drainage improvements, grassed or landscaped median and sidewalks. Franklin J. Tate & Donna Tate own a 4.84 acre parcel which is zoned A-1. To accommodate the future planned improvements on 66h Avenue, the County needs to acquire the 0.53 acres of the parcel for right- of-way purposes and needs a 10 foot Temporary Construction Easement. The County obtained an appraisal of the property indicating a value of $30,900.00. The County offered the appraised value of $30,900.00 to purchase the 0.53 acres, and Mr. and Mrs. Tate agreed to the offer. FUNDING Funding is budgeted and available in Account No. 10215241-066120-07806, Traffic Impact Fees/District 2/ROW/66th Avenue (49th Street — 691' Street). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board approve the Purchase Agreement for the 0.53 acres of property located at 6780 69th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967, and authorize the Chairman to execute the purchase agreement on behalf of the Board. ATTACHMENTS One Original Purchase Agreement One Original Temporary Construction Easement APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: December 12, 2017 F:\Public Works\ENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS\1505-66th Ave Widening 49th St to 81st St\2-Right of Way\BCC Agenda Memos\Franklin J. Tate\Franklin J. Tate Agenda Memo.doc P14 AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND FRANKLIN J. TATE AND DONNA L. TATE THIS AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE AND SELL REAL ESTATE ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of , 2017, by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("the County"), and Franklin J. Tate and Donna L. Tate ("the Seller) who agree as follows: WHEREAS, Seller owns property located at 6780 69th Street, Vero Beach, FL, Vero Beach, Florida. A legal description of the property is attached to this agreement as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference_ herein; and WHEREAS, the County is scheduled to do road improvements on 66th Avenue between 49th Street and 81st Street in the future and the road expansion will impact the Seller's property; and WHEREAS, in order for the County to proceed with its road expansion plans, the County needs to purchase property to be used as right-of-way from landowners along and adjacent to 66th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the County contacted the Seller and offered to purchase right -0f -way of approximately 23,100 square feet or 0.53 acres of property as depicted on Exhibit "B", and WHEREAS, the County also needs a 10 foot Temporary Construction Easement (TCE) from Seller as described on Exhibit "C" attached to facilitate the Project, and WHEREAS, the Parties agree this is an arm's length transaction between the Seller and the County, without the threat of eminent domain. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms, conditions, promises, covenants and premises hereinafter, the COUNTY and SELLER agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are affirmed as being true and correct and are incorporated herein. 2. Agreement to Purchase and Sell. The Seller hereby agrees to sell to the County, and the County hereby agrees to purchase.from Seller, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement that certain parcel of real property located at 6780 69th Street, Vero Beach, FL and more specifically described in the legal description attached as Exhibit "B", fee simple, containing approximately 23,100 square feet, all improvements thereon,. together with all easements, rights and uses now or hereafter belonging thereto . (collectively, the "Property"). -.... -- - -- -- ------------------------------------ !IX - - - >:: >: P15 2.1 Purchase Price, Effective Date. The purchase price ("Purchase Price") for the Property shall be $30,900.00 (Thirty Thousand and Nine Hundred 00/100 Dollars). The Purchase Price shall be paid on the Closing Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the County shall have approved the execution of this Agreement, either by approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners at a formal meeting of such Board or by the County Administrator pursuant to his delegated authority. 2.2 Remainder Parcel. The subject remainder parcel is estimated to contain approximately 187,770 square feet or 4.3106 acres, after the proposed taking, which is below the minimum lot size requirement for a residential ranchette in the A-1 zoning district. The subject property currently contains a conforming single family residence, thus continued use would be allowed. After the taking if the subject site were to become vacant, it would not have adequate site area. The Seller is requesting from Indian River County to have the subject remainder site area considered adequate in size for ranchette development, if reduced by the proposed right-of-way taking. The remainder parcel would be considered a legal non -conforming parcel as so long as the non -conformity is not increased, the parcel and house would be permitted to remain as such. 3. Title. Seller shall convey marketable title to the Property by warranty deed free of claims, liens, easements and encumbrances of record or known to Seller, but subject to property taxes for the year of Closing and covenants, restrictions and public utility easements of record provided (a) there exists at Closing no violation of any of the foregoing; and (b) none of the foregoing prevents County's intended use and development of the Property ("Permitted Exceptions`. 3.1 County may order an Ownership and Encumbrance Report or Title Insurance Commitment with respect to the Property. County shall within fifteen (15) days following the Effective Date of this Agreement deliver written notice to Seller of title defects. Title shall be deemed acceptable to County if (a) County fails to deliver notice of defects within the time specified, or (b) County delivers notice and Seller cures the defects within thirty (30) days from receipt of notice from County of title defects ("Curative Period"). Seller shall use best efforts to cure the defects within the Curative Period and if the title defects are not cured within the Curative Period, County shall have thirty (30) days from the end of the Curative Period to elect, by written notice to Seller, to: (i) to terminate this Agreement, whereupon shall be of no further force and effect, or (ii) extend the Curative Period for up to an additional 90 days; or (iii) accept title subject to existing defects and proceed to closing. 4. Representations of the Seller. 4.1 Seller is indefeasibly seized of marketable, fee simple title to the Property, and is the sole owner of and has good right, title, and authority to convey and transfer the Property which is the subject matter of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 2 P16 4.2 From and after the Effective Date of this Agreement, Seller shall take no action which would impair or otherwise affect We to any portion of the Property, and shall record no documents in the Public Records which would affect title to the Property, without the prior written consent of the County. 4.3.1 There are no existing or pending special assessments affecting the Property, which are or may be assessed by any governmental authority, water or sewer authority, school district, drainage district or any other special taxing district. 5. Default. 5.1 In the event the County shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the Seller shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the County at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the Seller nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages, or otherwise against the County; or (ii) waive the County's default and proceed to Closing. 5.2 In the event the Seller shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the County shall, at its sole option, be entitled to: (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to the Seller at or prior to the Closing Date and thereupon neither the County nor any other person or party shall have any claim for specific performance, damages or otherwise against the Seller; or (ii) obtain specific performance of the terms and conditions hereof; or (iii) waive the Seller's default and proceed to Closing: 6. Closing. 6.1 The closing of the transaction contemplated herein ("Closing" and "Closing Date") shall take place within 45 days following the execution of the contract by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. The parties agree that the Closing shall be as follows: (a) The Seller shall execute and deliver to the County a warranty deed conveying marketable title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and in the condition required by paragraph 3. (b) If Seller is obligated to discharge any encumbrances at or prior to Closing and fails to do so, County may use a portion of Purchase Price funds to satisfy the encumbrances. (c) If the Seller is a non-resident alien or foreign entity, Seller shall deliverto the County an affidavit, in a form acceptable to the County, certifying that the Seller and any interest holders are not subject to tax under the Foreign Investment and Real Property Tax Act of 1980. (d) The Seller and the County shall each deliver to the other such other documents or instruments as may reasonably be required to close this transaction. P17 6.2 Taxes. All taxes and special assessments which are a lien upon the property on or prior to the Closing Date (except current taxes which are not yet due and payable) shall be paid by the Seller. 7. Personal Property. 7.1 The Seller shall have removed all of its personal property, equipment and trash from the Property. The Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to County vacant and in the same or better condition that existed at the Effective Date hereof. 7.2 Seller shall deliver at Closing all keys to locks and codes to access devices to County, if applicable. 8.- Closing Costs: Expenses. County shall be responsible for preparation of all Closing documents. 8.1 County shall pay the following expenses,at Closing: 8. 1.1 The cost of recording the warranty deed and any release or satisfaction obtained by Seller pursuant to this Agreement. 8.1.2 Documentary Stamps required to be affixed to the warranty deed. 8.1.3 All costs and premiums for the owner's marketability title insurance commitment and policy, if any. 8.2 Seller shall pay the following expenses at or prior to Closing: 8.2.1 All costs necessary to cure title defect(s) or encumbrances, other than the Permitted Exceptions, and to satisfy or release of record all existing mortgages, liens or encumbrances upon the Property. 9. Miscellaneous. 9.1 Controlling Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue shall be in Indian River County for all state court matters, and in the Southern District of Florida for all federal court matters. 9.2 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to this transaction and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, between the Seller and the County relating to the subject matter hereof. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and executed by each of the parties. 9.3 Assignment and Binding Effect. Neither County nor Seller may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. The terms hereof shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and 4 - - ----- -- =- -------------- P18 their. successors and assigns. 9.4 Notices. Any notice shall be deemed duly served if personally served or if mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or if sent via °ovemight" courier service orfacsimile transmission, as follows: If to Seller: Franklin J. Tate & Donna L. Tate 6780 69th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967 If to County: Indian River County 1801 27th Street Vero Beach, FL 32960 Attn: Land Acquisition/Monique Filipiak Either party may change the information above by giving written notice of such change as provided in this paragraph. 9.5 Survival and Benefit. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, each agreement, representation or warranty made in this Agreement by or on behalf of either party, or in any instruments delivered pursuant hereto or in connection herewith, shall survive the Closing Date and the consummation of the transaction provided for herein. The covenants, agreements and undertakings of each of the parties hereto are made solely for the benefit of, and may be relied on only by the other party hereto, its successors and assigns, and are not made for the benefit of, nor may they be relied upon, by any other person whatsoever. 9.6 Attorney's Fees and Costs. In any claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. 9.7 Counterparts. This Agreement maybe executed in two or more counterparts, each one of which shall constitute an original. 9.8 County Approval Required: This Agreement is subject to approval by the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners as set forth in paragraph 2. 9.9 Beneficial Interest Disclosure: In the event Seller is a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall provide a fully completed, executed, and sworn beneficial interest disclosure statement in the form attached to this Agreement as an exhibit that complies with all of the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 286.23 prior to approval of this Agreement by the County. However, pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 286.23 (3) (a), the beneficial interest in any entity registered with the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission, or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose interest is for sale to the general public, is exempt from disclosure; and where the Seller is a non-public entity, that Seller is not required to disclose persons or entities holding less than five (5%) percent of the beneficial interest in Seller. 5 P19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman. Approved by BCC ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: Deputy Clerk Approved: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Franklin J. rate f Date Donna L. Tate Date 7ir, as to F rm d Legal fficiency: illiam K. DeBraal, eputy County Attorney 6 P20 EXHIBIT "A" The Kest 10 Acres of Tract 16, LFSS the North 661 feet, Section 6, Tokushi.p 32 South, FSa qe 39 Ernst, according to the last genial plat of lands of the Indian -CompanyRiver filed in the office of the Clark of the Circuit Court -of St. Lucie oonsltY," Florida, in Plat Book 2, Page 25; SUB= To an.easshent for ingress and egress veer the Ewt 20 feet: of that part of said West 10 acres of Tract 16. IYinq South of the North. 661 feet thereof and North of North Hinter Beach Road (69th Street); all DW lying -and being in. Section 6, Teunship 32 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida. Commonly known as: 6780 69th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32967 Parcel ID Number: 32-39-06-00001-0160-00001.0 P21 vrn.P� XW 0� � 0D5� 000 ; v cm n OCCO0 o�z Dmo;aO Z v O -n ��N m:;I �0n V)0 opo ,a Z C Z z m 0 � m D 0 T 22a;a azP > oa m 0 z av v En_ in -q o D 0*I r, .D� C o� � oT 0 1 m 00 rn� D 0 rnv ;v v� 0�i Cm En mmQOn az cN N O <� Om Px Ci c o �d � Ori (D � vo N r w c m U1 17 N � 0z E - O V) o z M z cn o '< z 0 Z D A m 0 o Z . E/) v M a C7 '� O Z -��O;uv-0 mOOoo FD c) Tilvo�vv �o-ovmcn 'n Dr�a�Ooo 0m��am r2om xzz xo00cn0 z --4 --1 �c�vvr2� r) zY r 0 0 o o� m� E z �0 0Ym 0 yZ;oCCZ 0 r- 0 -< �czZM ',cM Z 0z m C V) 0 0 m m CO n Z �u qy 4,1 i� kill g -0 - 240 Rm =�06,�'$gQp v U O � ^ 4 0 � o 0 O z D z z O N W 0 N O c a M O X O W a 0 v M Sn O M 0 N in p::50 0>� 20zmmomzm DO-mOm¢ DZD rntn , Zwtn "Z23 tn 0R-ml1m�O, >0 25 �w >M mmm moo mo$ 0 Zz-V 0�' �JZD mom>m8-q a c o p mo�o --q g -- -g xOpmR w 00m�:N 1OaOi�lCOWN gv c. -i mo O;KUZ Qm c ..,ow 4 0 D� z*oZmr� z,�D 03 * mmo�rn z �'�M can � O m O C 0 mD0 m L, 0-92 �r� COX 5j ozo DODO;Dwo -.zo'nz zrn�an y�0ir'�-Nimes o ;NODco* Z �MpomZ2 mcg;� 3!;o w c D O� Z X N zF-T,N� cn Z�O ;C Om.Z7 V z rn Com ,ju 5010 D O f7� MoD r om ;a Z� vm 0 mo OC O�r o WO m� O Do m v� �'' m o -n c0 00 n9 ;uZ MG) 0 vv W0 Oim ze vv z� 0 �p �D N 2 0 D T n _Ii m co 14 0 o 00 co 0 II �O 00 n 5;0 m w$ J (Nn o EAST UNE TRACT 15 WEST UNE TRACT 16 ID J L L. M D0 N;u my � N z m P22 TCE — 66", Avenue Roadway Widening - Project #1505 PID #32-39-06-00001-0160-00001.0 Project Parcel #315 — Franklin J. Tate & Donna L. Tate Prepared by and return to: IRC -PW -mf 1801 27'x' Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960-3388 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT This TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT, made and executed this day of . , 2017, by Franklin J. Tate and Donna L. Tate whose address is 6780 69th Street, Verb -."Beach, FL 32967 hereinafter called GRANTOR to Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960-3388, hereinafter called GRANTEE, WITNESSETH: That GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR and other consideratiph, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the GRANTEE a TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT on, over, across, and beneath the following described land, situate in Indian River County, Florida, to -wit: EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF This easement is for the purpose of all construction incidentals, such as; grading, sloping, sodding, clearing, excavating, dredging, etc. This easement shall exist only until the completion of the construction work for the 66th Avenue Project No. 1505. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the GRANTOR has herein set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed, and delivered in the presence of: Witness Signature SGrantor Signature l Printed Name: �•ra�v� Printed Name: Vinkli6 J. Taj Witness Signature Grantor Signature Printed Name:+�A� Qv� Printed Name: Donna L. Tate STATE OF FLORIDA} COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER) The foregging instrument was acknowledged before me this _1 da of i Joge_^ �- � , 2017, by �4r�►�C� 4�f , he/she/the are ersonaily kno to me or produced driver's license as identification. Sign: Printed name & Commission # Notary Public .,o'V.k MMAWK&SEY Appro d s to orm an Le ufficiency: * * MY COMMISSION I FF 946947 EXPIRES: Jmv" 912020 { °'+�o�eT Ba,deenuilNo�ryS6rvfut ounty Attor ey P23 Shvtch and Lega/Description For INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EXHIBIT 1 Legal Description (Temporary Construction Easement) Being the North 10.00 feet of the South 110.00 feet of the following described parcel as recorded in Official Records Book 2119, Page 1893, of the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida. The West 10 Acres of Tract 16, less the North 661 feet, Section 6, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, According to the Last General Plat of Lands of the Indian River Farms Company filed in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, in Plat Book 2, Page 25; Subject to an Easement of Ingress and Egress over the East 20 feet of that part of Y said West 10 acres of Tract 16, Lying South of the North 661 feet thereof and North of North Winter Beach Road (69th street); W all now lying and being in Section 6, Township 32 South, Range 39 East, Indian River County, Florida h n Containing 3,292 Square Feet, more or lessIn a 0 Surveyor's Notes g 1). This Sketch and Legal Description was prepared with the benefit of a Right of Way Map prepared by Klmley Horn for Indian River County, Job No. 1505, Dated July 25, 2017. Together with the Last General Plat of the Lands of the Indian River Fames Company Subdivision, N Recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 25, Public Records of St Lucie (now Indian River County), Florida. W 2).This legal description shall not be valid unless: o w (a) Provided in its entirety consisting of 2 sheets ,with sheet 2 showing the � sketch of the description. I (b) Reproductions of the description and sketch are not valid unless signed and sealed with 5 an embossed surveyor's seal. a is a Legend and Abbreviations C. R. = COUNTY ROAD I.R.F.W.C.D. = INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT L = LENGTH OF ARC LLC = LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK (P) =PLAT P.B. = PLAT BOOK PGE =PAGE PBS = PLAT BOOK ST. LUCIE A =DELTA ANGLE SQ. FT. = SQUARE FEET R = RANGE R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY T = TOWNSHIP PROVIDED IN ITS ENTIRETY CONSISTING OF 2 SHEETS WITH SHEET 2 BEING THE SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION Cert cation (NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SAID SKETCH AND LEGAL IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND s BELIEF. s I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS SKETCH AND -DESCRIPTION MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR SURVEYS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL BOARD OF SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.052 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA STATE ST S. 10-� aJ- 2Ci7 � p DATE OF SIGNATURE DAVID M. SILO PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER This is not a Boundary Survev FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 6139 �Hlvtivl+T: IN0/AN RIVE COUNTY, FL PIASUC WORKS DEPT./ENG/NEER/NC 0/1! 10I.31/17 v , . R. /NGLETT N/A 1 OF 2 Sketch and Lega/Description for Parcel 315 /ND/AN RIVER COUNTY (6780 69t17 STREET P24 Sketch andLega/Description for /ND/ANR/VER COUNTY LESS NORTH 661 U INDIAN RIVER FARMS COMPANY 32-39-06-OD001-0150-00004.0 w cL> Tract 16 32-39-06-00001-0160-00003.0 ALEXANDRA VAN DER REST Z (PBS 2, PGE 25) LEONARDO AND MARIA MANDINA SITE ADDRESS: 6830 69th STREET J VSITE ADDRESS: 6730 68th STREET O.R.B. 2720, PG 1060 I Q 32-39-06-00801-01 60-00001.0 O.R.B. 1932, PG. 1875 I� FRANKLIN AND DONNA TATE w SITE ADDRESS: 6780 68th STREET w O.R.B. 2119, PG. 1883 I Z_ -� EAST 20' FOR ►- INGRESS/EGRESS 1n EASEMENT w WEST 10 ACRES TRACT 16 ------------------------------------- 10' WIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION I EASEMENT I (3.292 SQ. Ftt) NORTH 10' OF I THE SOUTH 110' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —MURPHY RESERVATION LINE — 1 - ol r OSED 1 PARCEL 31 b i �1 r yl 1 IQi ' 69th STREET SOUTH UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 6 — — — —(NORTH WINTER BEACH ROAD) AND SOUTH LINE TRACK 16 _�.R.F.W.C.D. 9i NORTH UNE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 SECTION 7 SUB LATERAL A-13 NOT TO SCALE 32 - 39-07- 00001- 0010- 00008.0 STUART AND HELEN SHAFER SITE ADDRESS: 6850 CARSONS TRAIL DRIVE O.R.B. 1502, PG. 2395 s 1 J� AI;tNUT: IND/AN RIVER COUNTY, FL PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./ENG/NEER/NG MY. DRAWN BY: » 10133/ R E: N/A APPROVED BY: T: JOB NO: 2 OF 2 Sketch and Lega/Description for., Parce/ 315 /ND/AN RIVER COUNTY (6780 69th STREET P25 Legend and Abbreviations C.R. = COUNTY ROAD PBS = PLAT BOOK ST. LUCI I.R.F.W.C.D. = INDIAN RIVER FARMS A =DELTA ANGLE _ WATER CONTROL DISTRICT SQ. FT. = SQUARE FEET L = LENGTH OF ARC R = RANGE LLC = LIMITED LIABIUTY COMPANY R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK T = TOWNSHIP (P) = PLAT P.B. = PLAT BOOK PROVIDED IN ITS ENTIRETY CONSISTING OF 2 SHEETS PGE = PAGE - - AI;tNUT: IND/AN RIVER COUNTY, FL PUBLIC WORKS DEPT./ENG/NEER/NG MY. DRAWN BY: » 10133/ R E: N/A APPROVED BY: T: JOB NO: 2 OF 2 Sketch and Lega/Description for., Parce/ 315 /ND/AN RIVER COUNTY (6780 69th STREET P25 e. D. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown County Administrator THROUGH: Richard B. Szpyrka, P.E. Public Works Director FROM: James D. Gray, Jr. Natural Resources Manager SUBJECT: Work Order No. 6 Atkins North America, Inc. Wabasso Fishing Pier Demolition Project — Phase 2 Services DATE: December 1, 2017 BACKGROUND The Wabasso Fishing Pier was significantly impacted by the passing of Hurricane Matthew in early October 2016, causing approximately 400 LF of the Pier superstructure to be displaced from its substructure and deposited into the Indian River Lagoon south of its previous location. The current status of the fishing pier causes potential navigation hazards as well as a threat to the surrounding CR 510 Causeway. As the pier is damaged beyond repair, the only viable alternative is to completely demolish and remove the structure. A project location map and site photos are provided as.attachments to this agenda item. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS On November 15, 2011, the Board approved a contract with Atkins North America, Inc. (Atkins) for Professional Services relating to Public Works, Solid Waste Disposal District, Utilities -Major, and Utilities -Minor systems for a three-year term. On November 4, 2014, the Board renewed the contract for an additional three-year term to November 16, 2017. On October 24, 2017, the Board extended the contract until February 15, 2018. Atkins is the selected County Consultant for professional services related to the Wabasso Fishing Pier Demolition Project. On June 13, 2017, the Board approved Work Order No. 5 to cover Phase 1 services relative to field data collection and preliminary planning in order to obtain the necessary permits for the demolition of the Wabasso Fishing Pier. To date, all the services under Work Order No. 5 have been completed. The proposed Work Order No. 6 provides professional services (phase 2) relative to permitting, construction plans, bidding, and construction services. Work Order No. 6 totals a lump sum amount of $88,932. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@90005C59\ n BCL n 900C5C59.docx P26 BCC Agenda Item December 12, 2017 Page 2 FUNDING Funding, in the amount of $88,932, for Atkins Work Order No. 6 is available from the Florida Boating Improvement Fund, Hurricane Matthew Account No. 13321072-033490-17001. Staff is also working to secure up to 87.5% in FEMA cost share under Category A, Debris Removal (FEMA 4283 -DR -FL — Hurricane Matthew). The services under this work order are eligible for FEMA reimbursement. RECOMMENDATION The recommendation of staff is for the Board to approve Work Order No. 6 to the contract with Atkins North America, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign on behalf of the County. ATTACHMENT Atkins North America, Inc. Work Order No. 6 Wabasso Fishing Pier Location Map APPROVED AGENDA ITEM FOR: DECEMBER 12, 2017 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\ n BCL n 90005C59\@BCL@900C5C59.docx P27 WORK ORDER NUMBER 6 WABASSO FISHING PIER DEMOLITION PROJECT PHASE 2 SERVICES This Work Order Number 6 is entered into as of this day of , 2017 pursuant to that certain Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services entered into as of November 15, 2011 ("Agreement"), and amended November 4, 2014 and October 24, 2017 by and between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY") and Atkins North America, Inc. ("CONSULTANT"). The COUNTY has selected the Consultant to perform the professional services set forth on Exhibit A, attached to this Work Order and made part hereof by this reference. The professional services will be performed by the Consultant for the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit B, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference. The Consultant will perform the professional services within the timeframe more particularly set forth in Exhibit A, attached to this Work Order and made a part hereof by this reference all in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth in the Agreement. Pursuant to paragraph 1.4 of the Agreement, nothing contained in any Work Order shall conflict with the terms of the Agreement and the terms of the Agreement shall be deemed to be incorporated in each individual Work Order as if fully set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Work Order as of the date first written above. CONSULTANT Atkins North America. Inc. Kenneth M. Good, P.E. Title: Sr. Engineer III / Project Mgr~ Date: 30 NOV 2017 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IM Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Attest: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller By: (Seal) Deputy Clerk Approved: By: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney P28 .1TKI ,J OR EXHIBIT A Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services fo r Indian River County — GEC Work Order 06 Phase 2 — Permitting, Construction Plans, Bidding, and Construction Services Wabasso Fishing Pier Demolition Wabasso, Florida Indian River County (County) has requested services in support of the Wabasso Fishing Pier Demolition Project under the terms of Continuing Contract Agreement for Professional Services (dated November 15, 201 1) and Contract renewal (dated November 4, 2014). The Wabasso Fishing Pier was significantly impacted by the passing of Hurricane Matthew in early October 2016, causing the loss of 100' from the 525' west span and 300' from the 475' east span. The County has requested services to assist in the environmental filed surveys, engineering planning and design, permitting, bidding, and construction services for the full demolition of the Wabasso Fishing Pier. It is anticipated that the demolition will include the following elements: o West Pier ■ Removal of eight intact 50' pier span sections ■ Removal of one intact 25' pier span section (at abutment) ■ Removal of two damaged/displaced/submerged 50' pier span section ■ Removal of eleven intact pile pairs with caps ■ Removal of 150' of upland sidewalk o East Pier ■ Removal of three intact 50' pier span sections ■ Removal of one intact 25' pier span section (at abutment) ■ Removal of six damaged/displaced/submerged 50' pier span section ■ Removal of five intact pile pairs with caps ■ Removal of five damaged/displaced/submerged pile pairs with caps ■ Removal of 100' of upland sidewalk These services are expected to be completed in two phases. Phase 1 — Data Collection and Preliminary Planning, was covered in a previous Task Order and is complete. This Task Order will cover Phase 2, and will include design, permitting, bidding, and construction services. At the request of the County, Atkins (Engineer) has prepared this Phase 2 scope of services as follows: SECTION 1 PHASE 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1: PERMITTING ASSISTANCE The Engineer shall assist the County in their efforts to secure regulatory approval for the Project. The permitting agencies are independent government agencies, and the Engineer cannot make any guarantee in regards to the ultimate issuance of permits or the duration of the process. The Engineer will utilize their experience with the permitting process to help facilitate as smooth and efficient a process as is possible to the benefit of the Project. Page l of 7 P29 It is anticipated that a Nationwide Permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and a State regulatory exemption under Section 373.406(6) or a General Permit under 62-330.443 FAC (minor bridge removal) from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) will be required prior to the start of the demolition work. This is based on the type of work (demo/removal only, no new installation) and anticipated impact area to submerged resources (less than one-half acre). No other permits are anticipated or included with this scope of services. These services shall include the following tasks: A. The Engineer will conduct two individual preapplication teleconferences, one with permitting staff from FDEP and the other with USACE, or a single meeting on site with both agencies present. The intent of the discussion is to review the permitting requirements and regulations with the purpose of identifying any issues that may have significant impacts on the desired project elements and costs. Comments received from the agencies will be incorporated into the planning and construction documents and used to facilitate an efficient permitting process. B. The Engineer will prepare the appropriate application forms, assemble the application packages, and submit them for agency review for the USACE Nationwide and FDEP General permits noted above. The County may be required to provide application fees, application signatures, or other documentation in their possession. C. The Engineer will coordinate with the FDEP and USACE after their receipt of the applications. The Engineer shall prepare and submit up to one (1) reply to a Request for Additional Information (RAI) from FDEP and USACE, assuming the RAI does not require significant changes to the anticipated performance of the project. Subsequent RAIs or significant changes to the project would be outside the scope of this Task Order and will need to be provided as additional services. Since this is only a demolition project, creation or modification of a State Submerged Lands Lease or Easement is not anticipated or included in this scope. The County will need to provide a copy of the existing submerged lands lease for the bridge/pier. No other local, state, or federal permits are anticipated, nor included with this scope of services. It is understood that the County has received approval for disposal of the demolition debris at an offshore location, and does not require any assistance from the engineer in that pursuit. Any assistance with this approval, or modification to the offshore disposal approval, would be outside the scope of this Task Order and would need to be provided as additional services. TASK 2: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PREPARATION The Engineer shall develop the preliminary plans into a complete demolition plan set and accompanying specifications to meet the County's intended purpose of complete removal of the existing pier while following generally accepted engineering standards and permitting requirements. The construction document preparation services shall include the following tasks: A. Participate in one meeting with the County to facilitate the completion of the construction documents. The meeting shall be held at the project site or the County's offices. B. The Engineer shall make one plan submittal to the County during the construction plan development process. Following receipt of the regulatory permitting approvals, the Engineer shall Page 2 of 7 P30 nTKI�JS prepare a construction plan set incorporating reasonable revisions resulting from the regulatory review process. This plan set shall contain sufficient detail to allow accurate bidding and construction of the Project. The plans will remain in 8 '/z x l 1 size, scalable up to 17 x 22 size in order to avoid the costs and potential for errors associated with modifying the sheet size in a plan set. The construction plan set will include appropriate specifications. These specifications may be included on the plans or as a separate document. An opinion of probable cost will be prepared upon the completion of, and included with, the construction plan set. The County will have the opportunity to review and comment on the construction plan set. The Engineer will incorporate reasonable comments in to the plan set prior to release for bidding. A. The Engineer will conduct and prepare a reconnaissance level bathymetric survey between the Wabasso Pier Demolition work area and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The survey will consist of a minimum of two profile lines approximately 100' apart along the apparent best route (approximately three miles in length south of the work area). The purpose of this survey is to provide prospective bidders with reliable water depth information between the work area and the nearest federally maintained channel, facilitating proper equipment selection and accurate bidding. This water depth information will be included with the construction document package. TASK 3: BIDDING ASSISTANCE The Engineer shall assist the County in facilitating the bidding process. These bidding services shall include the following tasks: A. The Engineer will provide the County the pertinent project related technical information, such as; project descriptions, schedule requirements, and an itemized bid form for inclusion in front end documents prepared by the County. At that time, the Engineer will also provide a cursory review of the front end documents for coordination purposes with the rest of the bid documents. B. Provide the County with construction plans and specification, and permit documents for inclusion in the bid document package. The County will assemble the complete package for advertise and distribution. C. Assist the County in addressing bidder questions during the bidding process. This will include providing question responses and minor plan revisions to be issued by the County as addenda to the bid documents. D. Attend and participate in one pre-bid conference facilitated by the County. E. Review the submitted bid packages for conformance with the technical requirements of the bid documents and contact the supplied references for the apparent low bidder. TASK 4: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES The Engineer shall assist the County in the administration and monitoring of the construction process. The scope and associated cost for these services is based on an anticipated schedule (two-month construction duration), and expected permitting requirements. A longer schedule, un -anticipated permit requirements, or other un -anticipated tasks may impact the scope and costs and necessitate a change request. The anticipated construction services shall include the following tasks: Page 3 of 7 P31 nTf�as� A. Pre -Construction Services: The Engineer will review the Contractor's pre -construction submittal documents, which may vary based on permitting requirements, for conformance with the contract requirements. The Engineer will conduct a pre -construction meeting with the County, Contractor, Impacted Utility Providers, and other appropriate project stakeholders. This service will include coordination of the meeting time and location with attendees, preparation of a meeting agenda, leading the meeting, and distribution of meeting minutes. B. Construction Progress Meetings The Engineer will conduct weekly construction progress meetings with the County, contractor, and other appropriate project stakeholders. This service will include coordination of the meeting time and attendees, preparation of a meeting agenda, leading the meeting, and distribution of meeting minutes. Based on a construction duration of two months, eight progress meetings are anticipated. It is expected the meetings will be held at the project site and will coincide with the Engineer's weekly part time construction observation visits. In conjunction with the weekly meeting, the Engineer will provide a brief summary for the previous week with applicable field reports attached. Typical items addressed during the progress meetings will include: • Schedule updates and progress review • Pay application status • Shop drawings and submittal review status • Action items / remedial actions • Requests for clarification and information • Safety • Turbidity monitoring review • Environmental observation review • SWPPP review C. Part Time Construction Observation The Engineer will conduct periodic site visits to observe and document the progress of the project, and assist the County in determining if the work is proceeding in general accordance with the contract documents. It is anticipated that the Engineer will make one site visit per week, spending approximately two hours on site during each visit. Site visits will include observations of the demolition area from the bridge or adjacent shore. Site visits will not include; observations from on the water or a vessel, diving or underwater observations, or observations at the reef disposal site. These site visits are not intended to be exhaustive or to extend to every aspect of the work, but rather are to be limited to spot checking and similar methods of general observation of the work based on the Engineer's exercise of professional judgement. These site visits will be scheduled to coincide with the weekly progress meetings. The purpose of the site visits will be to: • Monitor construction progress • Observe contractor's work practices • Spot check work for conformance with contract documents and advise the County and contractor of any non-compliant work • Document the progress, findings, and observations of each visit with field book notes, observation reports, and photos. Page 4 of 7 P32 nTKI�JS It is understood that the County will provide staff for daily onsite observations during construction, and that this staff will share their findings, observation, etc. with the Engineer. D. Requests for information, interpretation, and/or Clarification (RFI's) The Engineer will receive RFIs from the contractor and will consult with and advise the County on the issuance of necessary clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents as appropriate for the orderly completion of the project. The Engineer, upon the County's request, will prepare such clarifications and interpretations. Such clarifications and interpretations will be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents. The Engineer will review and recommend Records of Minor Changes authorizing minor variations from the requirements of the Contract Documents, as necessary. Engineer will provide draft responses for each clarification and interpretation to the County for approval prior to issuance to the contractor. For the purposes of estimating the fee for this task order, it is anticipated that there will be two RFIs which are reasonably inferable from the contract documents. Effort for complex RFIs including requests for alternate designs, materials, means, or methods has not been included in the fee estimate, but can be added if the need arises and is requested by the County. E. Pay Applications The Engineer will review and advise the County on the contractor's pay applications. The Engineer's review and evaluation of each pay application will be based on field observations of the completed work compared to the contractor's schedule of values. It is anticipated that pay applications will be submitted on a monthly basis. F. Submittal Document Review The Engineer will review and approve (or take other appropriate action in respect of) contractor submittals required by the contract documents for conformance with the contract documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. The Engineer will be responsible for submittal document control. The Engineer will receive, maintain and track all submittal documents from the Contractor. Contractor will transmit submittal documents to Engineer in a timely manner. The Engineer's estimated level of effort for this task is based on eight, one time, submittals of varying complexity and one weekly submittal. G. Project Close-out After the Contractor has provided written notification that work is substantially complete, and the County and Engineer concur the work is substantially complete, the Engineer will accompany the County and the contractor on one inspection of the project determine the status of completion. The Engineer will provide a report and/or punchlist identifying any incomplete work After the Contractor has provided written notification that all punchlist items have been addressed and the work is completed, the Engineer will provide a final inspection of the completed project. Upon determining that all Work is complete, Engineer will issue a notice to the County stating the project is complete. However, if such inspection in the opinion of the Engineer reveals incomplete or unacceptable work, the Engineer will provide a report identifying the incomplete work and provide a re -inspection once work is completed. When Engineer finds that the work is acceptable under the contract documents, the Engineer will request the contractor make the final Page 5 of 7 P33 �TKI��JS closeout submittals. Re -inspections are not anticipated and were not included in the fee estimation for this task. Upon construction completion, the Engineer will prepare a post construction report. This report will consist of a brief narrative of the project progress, from start to finish, and it will include, as attachments, key construction documentation. The intent of the report is to provide the County with one location to access key documentation and to be used with permit compliance submittals. H. Permit Compliance The Engineer will assist the County with permit compliance requirements for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) by completing the tasks outlined below. The Engineer will prepare and submit commencement notifications for both FDEP and USACE The Engineer will review the contractor's daily turbidity monitoring reports for compliance with the contract documents. The Engineer will submit the turbidity monitoring reports to FDEP on a weekly basis. The Engineer will prepare and submit completion notifications for both FDEP and USACE. SECTION 2 ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS 1. Application fees, impact fees and any other fees required by regulatory agencies are considered a direct expense to the County and are not included in this scope and fee. 2. It is assumed the pedestrian bridge to be demolished is owned by the County, and that coordination with, or approvals from, FDOT will not be required for its removal. 3. It is assumed that the demolition work will be managed from the waterside (i.e. a barge) and that no work will be conducted form the highway bridge. If it is determined that work will be done from the highway bridge, coordination and approval from FDOT may be required. Such coordination and approval would be outside this scope of services and would be considered an additional service. 4. It is understood that the County obtained regulatory approval for disposal of the pier demolition debris at an offshore location. This work was done by internal County staff. 5. It is assumed the County Purchasing Department will lead the bid process, facilitate the pre bid meeting, issue addenda, and compile the bid tabulation. 6. The ultimate decisions related to regulatory approvals and funding assistance lie outside of the Engineer's control. The Engineer cannot guarantee issuance of regulatory approvals or funding. 7. Creation or modification of a State owned submerged lands lease or easement is not included in this scope of services. 8. Seagrass monitoring and reporting is not included with this scope and fee. However, it may be required by regulatory agencies. That requirement would be determined during the formal permitting process. If it is required, Atkins can provide those services as additional services. 9. It is understood that the County is pursuing funding assistance from FEMA. Services to assist with this effort, along with meeting compliance requirements associated with FEMA funding, are not included in this scope and fee. 10. It is assumed that the project will meet the Florida Statewide Programmatic Opinion (SWPBO) thresholds for Activity #10 in Consultation, Removal of Marine Debris. If the USACE determines the project does not meet these thresholds, they may require outside consultation. This could result in an increase in the duration of the permitting process. Page 6 of 7 P34 ,1TKiNS 1 l . Services associated with regulatory compliance for the offshore reef are not included with this scope. It is assumed that County staff will handle this since they secured the reef approval directly. Atkins can provide assistance with the reef site as an additional service if requested. 12. Only those services specifically mentioned in Section 1 are included with this scope of services. Additional services can be provided at an agreed upon lump sum fee or at the standard hourly rates. 13. It is understood there are often unforeseeable conditions and events impacting the progress and cost of permitting and construction. No contingency has been provided for within this scope. Effort to address any unforeseen issues will be considered additional services to be negotiated on an as needed basis. SECTION 3 SCHEDULE & DELIVERABLES The following schedule is anticipated for the completion of each task (week number measured from receipt of a notice to proceed). This is an anticipated schedule only and is largely dependent on the regulatory agency's progression, the County's bidding process, and the construction schedule: Task 1: Permitting Assistance Week 20 Task 2: Construction Document Preparation Week 24 Task 3: Bidding Assistance Week 32 Task 4: Construction Services Week 44 The following deliverables will be provided to the County: A. Permit Submittal Packages (via electronic file transfer — pdf or paper if wet signature is required). B. Construction Plan Set and Cost Estimate (via electronic file transfer— pdf). C. Bid Document Package (via electronic file transfer — pdf). D. Post Construction Report (via electronic file transfer — pdf). SECTION 4 COMPENSATION The proposed scope of services will be provided on a lump sum basis administered pursuant to the provisions of our master contract dated September 15, 2010, and invoiced monthly based on the percentage of completion of the overall project. Task 1: Permitting Assistance $ 13,056 Task 2: Construction Document Preparation $ 29,298 Task 3: Bidding Assistance $ 13,264 Task 4: Construction Services $ 33,314 TOTAL $ 88,932 Page 7 of 7 P35 N co c0 a P36 N w 00 N O N « O tN0 QMj T O N M 00 w 00 C 64 m (D N (O - co X W EA - ifi " 613, Vi .649, r O - = O m - N :- -- Cl N O h CD M r p O _ O :" p p O O '" O _ O_ - - - O O Vi H O O O - O O Cl 00 Q O - O'--' O O d9 W p - O - LL O O. O O p CD to p U Z W Q C7 _ N - -. - - O W E O .' O O O O O O O N = A < N V _ . N (D - - r pOo r z a a - 6191 (fl m O - 0 0 Cl o 0 o 0 v ao v rn in E: r» ca e» _ W ` JR O N CL m o 0 0 0 D o rn C w U Cl) OD LO N_ (D M tol� 64 iTL O N a O'. O O O O O O O COC,4 C7 'L N r V - ONO- �.N�00 Lo _ — to Y « « « « « « « « « « H H FO' H H FO- H H 10- H W d N H N N (0 N N N N V% R ++ O3 R N 14 H (0 H W H m H m H m H (6 H D W z C 3m G J Z H 0 C c m HMA H a J y Q O O y O �_ W Q Q ~ O C u () m 0 W JAZ~ L N N r J Z p z a U a U a ~O U m U N Cl) IV N Y Y Y Y p N N N N 4 m N co c0 a P36 ' moi. " o ``" 7 ^"'!} %" �7`i t ■ l •�� � ��� Sf`�.s-�7`���"'�,t b' apt t. i Zea �r ysJ-�`rn(c �• r 'r 4'q ;ter M. Q W � `�4�07 �'' i. ll >. Gi • r /.,,,,,Y ¢ �..4 4. �).q3 0i -°y at n '9ns � �•� �.1P� • � - pg ? td. � � cp �=ou i Ar � d Y•Y .9 �. •.� C�(.� _ °' '- may.-; ,'g a�• o _ F LLLU y �� vb Qv. ° w, 5t �• �i •>- o o.-.� t cr (y 7. Z A"� �" d ^n q+�4C 'R �1"�a� •h tT Wof°by , N �r,C{' $+=�'�'`4'^'?ay�•. G?i } •'. (L - Jh_ r t r�r.?r4 mm oo5asya '' � r� �`�°�`}'', iw5. • • - �wan.,�� ,� _� _ O ki`' - -------- - t �r�. > _ � )�T' o �°," { °"'•� . a '�� :1 �., �� 1 t�d� _ ��� am1-h� 5 u F///`�/' � a,:5 Yr' °• o`' r. ti'` n a Q � �a d' - _ a�(� � r •rt c' ct..' - g .a":� w a �`rf• �' ' �,�D �t,.c3r� prd . p o L-'' n i``Skti oyV ' �_' � r r Vic.. �c o o ¢ n .. G�i+„j •S �- -y'v� •q. o r,)i a :a�, {° .°' �`t� °x�>�� r � •- Y � c G -' 4. � W rt b J 4`- d G�. � a �".tas �-7 �T a afiv a3 p't ry yA • � f i µ � � F F � tr ch yr Y� N 1� ��• r� b 4 i�. o c � w d e'..'� Y'�" a oaS �, '�`�.iCr,��'r - ❑ - 1• -r.. : 'Z � 1 v .o' "+ N �_ [ tti ?f"i' s K JEL 1�_ +� �i � my] o' o' C e-. 4 [• d a it •s.j a o d u•Y Q 'r ' `' `- O; E _ '_ c. 'a a r6 w) -a+ d t> a 2 •y. •nGrG; �o r -41 �nt m f ' CC ez I,,* bL T Eb L, _,T � 43y `' �r '�,a" . z � "r i•-lytn. d ;' >ti. �i;: o q ° _wr `� - a:� a � r = m i � - c !r �! F 1T a `�i�� f' G � �.,'2 4 '” �ati 4i ! �"/at a•£ , �•}i° F. �. a7 F� $� �- " _5• G.Ae C w fi,ti4x C .� ;» tc 5.i _Y T a-ar !P <_ ids'' ., _ o 'a q�ga'xr .. � ••h' r o ,c• t• •cn L ; �af t � rs n?•i �� ate„ �,t{�••a m a .a row �a. c>>P - �,¢. ;Q ° 3• r° { : a ° c ; •4 •xrra� CLr •�•+,� .c B- a rO .Q�+' mss•" " iW ir_ -' 4 �• ��" r, [� ( / 'a _ n7 r- ^G pG az �s`i c- 5t„1''�pd d 'J yh" •. o • ■;.a;. �S 1 �Iy �, i ><ec-` ai GL p F. Y i,� air` d '$, 2i c S' p o .4 a .c> • � a �! ° •� + e �" ye.� � O o rf �y. 1a ° to rh rg , O' ( r -+'°O �N a'•rtt/k`sq� F, `>aE L^ -i `�..r- g a Ii, • '�� �t S r, ,� // h � ty� =y ❑ (` '• �. a. c :ic }�;- Q etc{: It d n ,. . -• /` ■ - af(Qd a & a ,{y 9d„ .1•s•-sm. w +•r"e-•- _ 0 ` •'7a.'T 4 ? CL co e n_' :rsi I _ (y a O ,r. i ,. ••S: cp CO = n asF�ca a+ d'o Aga•f' r t r Yt. 5>_ f f t R/-, t c c e.. � � �; 5P "Qd�'�,�'Y^.:� F�• ��L `�R'#'si;•� � O 4� ,� i v LQA'R jn / % 3 ` t"r � L '�?-'�'' fco o Ut• 6 c s q•) }ryf v . a r lid` j i'� a'3��t � 4 ..b u' - t r'�^.,y,'",. _ e '�f i 4 t...t�' t r r -a •E ta^ Oat �¢3� t "i.cf j�. T ¢-�'•5°T; y °i ,r / - ��` ��•4,• �' `� ��. �� Sff;� � f l� �' te• °. � s 5��' LL 'q :[F L .N p �F. r t � �f •j, r r .7i8Y•(� c �y `"' ��� -rb -C,h 4 4 - 9 �"��a•+ +� .G 6 a'y R a ::47'T.P i5+ _t7 a p "< DA ri A o r s i c r .i - r c�.�c.. f -•T.4 ���a ,.R .p.'' -q. kr 4 -; ` o. u it e� �' Ye }. + aw .f f .per, /(}•' t,n kFi,,r,�u "�' :.r {'4' Y r C _ 1' i '' t r fx r'`• �„ �F"} � �,�• �F � r `.� � � 'r�� �r .cr» �.� � ; rpt #t F 1 ;;'�?s��-�1��•if ' r t� b E ' <_ -t � .c � `. r .y �, ( r.. � •'I -,, r # 2'_e ri r� 0'4 C " 7U, H � ,'�' s,� 9 G`. f6 1 - � O . �. '� 1 ., vt13 Y i_fy%- '.Osla` � �� l ' [�l'l�� •Y - o ,w eq a O r. i,• i' ,=e t f t 1 : 0�` v >7pe„-. m1vt �' +� e?' zk -- t� L. r ,� !2-r� r = J > v O .a • a `'tt• �'"ii>`k 9' '�` ''c'-Qa ,K'.f- v -�.rc 5 '�.c _ i " N X( � • fd Ii tr...`;'' � P 'ef :. 'r ,`_ �. z ^�� JA :�'t O6• .� -� + • - �c r- r` ''E"cam r ? _ -z :`� o � �:t` (g„`=' Yri �p�" Od' • � �.a e [+� •c. -t I _ _ E+ L^' . ,.. uj r u. b7�3t•`•' � �"7Y " � "i�^ � � X z/Gr'� .1 � U F a • {f - D Z Nom_ J Z CL) �'� 5o. i ,} c Ifi ¢ 0 } N a o' 3 ZO 1 w z�F Co ZLL (� O ¢WZ (p ' • s bit w a) Q al a 0 t5.. FU LL s v J• ¢}`_ .a mU O>>j1 3 r+4 • ,Q w w m .v = ro a 2 c c o r c 3 H J d N> o U X i Q Q Id L a. — (n _ m'..' Q i7'' .. + 0 �nUJ UJ = aL '�' � •Y, st•.'� - - �c..==-rte - n�>�. -.w0000 rr_�,-a:c�na. �.�c .a t,.L N t „�:.. � 'k�.>i 3�s�z<��i. `ikd P37 L INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: November 27, 2017 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: Arjuna Weragoda, P.E., Capital Projects Manager Subject: Developer Agreement For The Extension Of the Water Main along 801h Avenue DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: The Developer (Reinaldo and Ginger De Armas) extended the existing 8 -inch water main along 80th Avenue to serve their property (14385 80"' Avenue) and the neighbor's property (14375 80"' Avenue). The Developer hired a local Florida registered engineer to design, permit and perform construction inspection services. Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc., secured by the Developer, installed the water main per Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS) standards and specifications. The installation of the water main was pressure tested, as well as successful bacteriological sampling performed and cleared by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) in August 2017. IRCDUS accepted the water main in late September 2017. ANALYSIS: The construction comprised of approximately 300 -linear feet of an 8 -inch diameter water main on the west side running south along 80th Avenue. Now that the water main has been installed, the Developer would like to enter into a Developer's Agreement with the County where the Developer will be reimbursed the fair share cost of the other benefitting parcels once those properties have connected and as outlined in the Developer's Agreement. As shown on Exhibit B of the attached agreement, the estimated offsite water main cost sharing between the Developer and the benefitting property owner's is as follows: Developer's Share $13,048.75 Benefitting Property Fair Share $10,676.25 Total Project Cost $23,725.00 The costs were determined based on a hydraulic fair share (55% Developer's share; 45% Benefitting Property Fair Share) of up-sizing the infrastructure to serve future customers in the Ercildoune Heights area in Sebastian. P38 FUNDING: County funds are not required for the subject item. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Developer's Agreement with Mr. and Mrs. Reinaldo and Ginger De Armas, and authorize the Chairman to execute the Developer's Agreement on their behalf. ATTACHMENT(s): Reinaldo and Ginger De Armas Developers Agreement (8 Pages) C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Tech nologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@EOOCFCE6\@BCL@EOOCFCE6.docx P39 AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND REINALDO AND GINGER DE ARMAS FOR 14385 80TH AVENUE, WATER MAIN EXTENSION IN ROSELAND, FL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF-SITE UTILITIES THIS AGREEMENT by and between INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, the address of which is 180127th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 (hereinafter the "COUNTY"), and Reinaldo and Ginger De Armas, property owners, whose address is: 9710 SW 72"d Court, Pinecrest, FL 33156 (hereinafter the DEVELOPER) is effective upon execution by the second of the two parties. WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER, in conjunction with the construction improvements at their homestead, is making available facilities to the subject properties located on: 1. 14375 80th Avenue 2. 14385 80th Avenue 3. 14395 801h Avenue 4. 14390 801h Avenue 5. 14380 801h Avenue collectively "Adjacent Properties" more specifically described in Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 918.05, of the Code of Indian River County, the COUNTY requires the DEVELOPER to provide the utility improvements to connect to the planned water main, and the COUNTY, pursuant to Section 201.11, of the Code, agrees to partially reimburse the DEVELOPER, as provided herein, for the cost of providing these off-site utilities; WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER is responsible for the fair share cost of the Adjacent Property at 14375 801h Avenue and their homestead at 14385 800' Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the COUNTY and DEVELOPER agree as follows: 1. OFF-SITE UTILITIES: The DEVELOPER has constructed the necessary off-site utilities described herein as directed by the Indian River County Department of Utility Services (IRCDUS). The COUNTY shall reimburse the DEVELOPER for installing off-site utilities as outlined below: A. 8 -inch Diameter Water Main alone the west side of 80' Avenue from the north side of 144th Street at the intersection of 80" avenue and 1441h Street, south to the common lot line for 14385 801h Avenue: The DEVELOPER has furnished and installed approximately 300 linear feet of 8 -inch PVC Water Main and PE double service for 14375 and 14385 801h Avenue and appurtenances, along with water services. See Exhibit "A" for location sketch and Exhibit "B" for detailed cost tabulation. P40 Reimbursement: The COUNTY shall reimburse the DEVELOPER once connection by the Adjacent Properties have been made pursuant to the provisions of Section 201.11, of the Code, for funds advanced by DEVELOPER to oversize the off-site facilities. The reimbursement to the DEVELOPER shall be made by the COUNTY within 60 days of payment of connection cost to the COUNTY and within the 5 -year TERM as outlined in Section 19 by Adjacent Properties specifically listed below: Adjacent Property Address Adjacent Property ID Adjacent Property Fair Share 14395 80`h Avenue 30382500001001000012.0 $3,558.75 1439.0 801h Avenue 30382500001002000001.0 $3,558.75 14380 80`h Avenue 30382500001002000002.0 $3,558.75 See Exhibit "C" for legal descriptions of specific parcels. The unit prices obtained from the successful bidder as well as the "as -built" field measured quantities are used to determine the actual cost per linear foot, which has been used to determine the actual value of the reimbursement per property. 2. Amendment: This Agreement may be modified only by a written instrument executed by all parties to the Agreement. 3. Assignability: Either party may assign this Agreement. However, the rights granted herein shall run with the land and are not the personal property of the DEVELOPER. Therefore, while the DEVELOPER has the right under this Agreement to freely transfer the rights and obligations granted by this Agreement, the assignee shall not have the right to transfer these rights to another property unless this Agreement is amended in writing by the assignee and the COUNTY. 4. Authority: Each party hereto represents and warrants to the other that the execution of this Agreement and any other documents required or necessary to be executed pursuant to the provisions hereof are valid, binding obligations and are enforceable in accordance with their terms. 5. Captions: Captions, if included, in this Agreement are included for convenience only and are not to be considered in any construction or interpretation of this Agreement or any of its provisions. 6. Construction Plans, Technical Specifications and Contract Documents: The DEVELOPER has completed construction drawings and obtained a Utilities Construction Permit from IRCDUS and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The DEVELOPER has completed the work satisfactorily and obtained FDEP clearance. 7. Definition All pronouns shall be deemed to refer to the masculine, feminine, or neuter, singular or plural, as the identity of the party or parties may require. 8. DEVELOPER's Obligations: The DEVELOPER shall be deemed in possession of the potable water on the DEVELOPER's side of the water meter; however the DEVELOPER shall not be deemed to own the potable water, and the transfer or sale of water by the DEVELOPER is prohibited. The DEVELOPER may not transfer or sell water capacity to any party for use off-site of the property. 2 P41 9. Dedication: The COUNTY has performed the final inspection of the off-site water facilities for conformance with the approved plans and specifications, the DEVELOPER has conveyed all the off-site water facilities together with an interest in land, as may be required by the COUNTY, to the COUNTY. The conveyance included the following documents as required by the COUNTY: a) Bill of Sale b) Maintenance Security c) Record Drawings (hard copy and electronic format—AutoCAD rel. 2009 or higher) 10. Entire Agreement This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties relative to the subject matter hereof, and there is no oral or written agreements between the parties, nor any representations made by either party relative to the subject matter hereof, which are not expressly set forth herein. 11. Governing Law & Jurisdiction: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida and the laws of the United States pertaining to transactions in such state, and all actions arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Indian River County, Florida, or, in the event of federal jurisdiction, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. All of the parties to this Agreement have participated freely in the negotiation and preparation hereof. Accordingly, this Agreement shall not be more strictly construed against any one of the parties hereto. 12. Indemnification: The DEVELOPER hereby releases and holds harmless the COUNTY, and the COUNTY'S officers, employees and agents, from and against any and all claims for damages, costs, third party claims, judgments, and expense to persons or property that may arise out of, or be occasioned by, any work contemplated by this agreement, or from any act or omission of any representative, agent, client, and/or employee of DEVELOPER, and DEVELOPER shall indemnify the COUNTY against any such claims and any judgments that may be entered in connection therewith, including attorney fees. DEVELOPER shall indemnify the COUNTY against any claim for damage that any utility, whether publicly or privately owned, may sustain or receive in connection with any work contemplated by this agreement. DEVELOPER shall not make any claim of any kind or character whatsoever against the COUNTY for damages that it may suffer by reason of the installation, construction, reconstruction, operation, and/or maintenance of any public improvement, or utility, whether presently in place or that may in the future be constructed or installed, including but not limited to, any water and/or sanitary sewer mains and/or storm sewer facilities, and whether such damage is due to flooding, infiltration, backflow, and/or seepage caused from the failure of any installation, natural causes, or from any other cause of whatsoever kind or nature. It is the intention of this indemnification agreement on the part of DEVELOPER, and a condition of this agreement, that it shall be full and total indemnity against any kind or character of claim whatsoever that may be asserted against the COUNTY. DEVELOPER hereby agrees to defend any and all suits, claims, and causes of action brought against the COUNTY arising out of or in connection with any work contemplated by this agreement, and DEVELOPER agrees to pay any judgment or judgments, including attorney fees, that may be rendered against the COUNTY or against the COUNTY'S officers, employees or agents in connection therewith. 15. Maintenance Security: The DEVELOPER's Contractor, Timothy Rose Contracting, Inc., has warrantied the installed water main through September 5, 2018. P42 16. Multiple Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in a number of identical counterparts that, taken together, shall constitute collectively one (1) Agreement; but in making proof of this Agreement, it,shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart executed by the party to be charged. 17. Recording of Agreement: This Agreement may be recorded in the official records of Indian River County by the COUNTY. If recorded, the obligations defined in this Agreement shall run with the land and shall bind subsequent owners of the property for the term of this Agreement. The DEVELOPER shall pay for all recording cost. 18. Severability / Invalid Provision: If any provision of the Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under present or future laws, such provision shall be fully severable; this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision had never comprised a part of this Agreement, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable provision or by its severance from this Agreement. 19. Term: The term of this agreement shall be five years from the effective date of this agreement. The effective date is from BCC approval. The County may terminate this Agreement early in its sole discretion if it determines that the development project intended to be served by the improvements is suspended or discontinued. 20. Time of Essence: Time is of the essence of this Agreement; however, if the final date of any period which is set out in any provision of this Agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday under the laws of the State of Florida, then, in such event, the time of such period shall be extended to the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. 4 P43 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY and the DEVELOPER have accepted, made, and executed this Agreement as follows: ss Signature 20 %Gl i ao/Jo Printed &LbOr-Aille— II—` --'—t% ,gip Witness Printed Name v STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER DEVELOPER: By: Printed name: Reinaldo DeArmas Title: Developer Date: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day ofA4 2017, by Ginger De Armas, who is personally known to me. Name:,iAP,iv Commission # ZS Expiration Date 61 i Zv' O Attest: Jeffery R. Smith, Clerk of the Circuit Court By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency BEw m R DAMS . WCOMMISSION 0 FF 9=9 WIRES:4a 13,2= Baled TNM Notary Pdit W derw bffi BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman BCC Approved: Approved by: County Attorney. Jason E. Brown, County Administrator Page 5 FAUteities\UTlUTY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\60th Ave Water Main Extension - UCP# 3337\Developers Agreement\Developers Agreement - ON -Site Watermair fRevi Arjuna.docx P44 EXHIBIT -A LOCATION SKETCHES 4415 to sr �. yy •-Y•�'`i Y q' { � !' ,-- '•.� �Rk--.mak .. � � - ` Q •!'x!''.o �. 1 .+.�s�. -'J.'. " i (- .'t, t'y.. - e• fi +u� . '•;f 3w�it$� � y e t �-7. t•.�a�5.l: 7 -�.. t s. � 1 � ��• � — -•'Ca � �' • t r �� %f ! � .� �' � l.,• � 14415 :'.��,15 �.' �� F�� + � 1 + � ,� iS^"`-, � 'p, :1� �t x � 14455 ��'iy !tr'•- � `�'•. +. iti"` -� z- -:.-_ I c 2r � it ' � � s i� ',1` 3 = 14450 � � .x+•l 4 ..x � ,�t ,.l + ..4. 'f` r t .'s. fi _ _ = ! it .) •�. +, 14415 ;df��aF +';�� w r t c . F'.� 'yY •j �1 � aii � t ��,.+ j� � ��, � 14425 � 4t L '.S ^ . i 14415 ;�rr3'� {�. tetra t:.' -' �� t-'�q r>c y i f\_ ,,,�,• } Z,•, i , T't. _ _ `��~' �� .14415 ';.a• c i' �, "-' t i1 .,�:: yet{ � 1{4420 {, , Yr,- �„ 'A _ "�� :sa.. � • s� i °j- tM1f'��` Y"7 +�• t' 1 7 _y� 5 1*y �,.. ... �i;itr. Sa '"f•' _ J J �' � + �E r �1 `r'� } .-�� F.+�1, !• 7',i- 1440.5 n� , �n � } • rs i � t L :+i - •�-� x i.. i ,�, ' +... '. f SI j 7785 1i a. yh , �� :t'+ ,,.+�'tt �' • • ,r. 5yi; � t � t it � 1 "y���'r'`�.y�,��-. r t • r +, � �'��' `�{� =•'p 'gam -`*'t � " �i �,rt � t ,' , �� 14-3' - �� r � .i+ a:; � �.��' "•' ii• + � y.4��a tcl ��,-� rr r ci �r i L w ` t?i ? 14390 wo- 3 fit'' t �' t�,r. + -row Y�, r._,`� 7 ... ` X at• - � a. / 14385 1 6 i1, tl `s Z �- �r-�"E-4a�'�f t.4"'^' �t� _ 1 � rl�f �" w � ��� l: 'Guth L�+ �•, ��� � � - 1438D "s 1 ry w Ytt•r t. n C Y � ,,�,,CtD a'a>- ��,rs� �s �g3 •tt�' # J, r_r� .o�tl'�•1, t b;�' �•r}11 YY`i � � � g+S? r� L. �t'�t., � t ,.,�c :�-,.gr.t�v,G 1 1 -qs•�+, •:' �"'reik�^a y..•'r:; w t r. - 375f . �E pti }t !• ..tom-�, Y+ - it ]p ,•�`-.`rte••-b1ff�,i(„ T` c.u�a.. i : ; i `i ='•Z.. gy.-� 4365 ,� a, r ` ` ���_%-c' �� c' t �ti� u •k i :t 1 � tom-`!, TI c 14370 4 n , t- . �=�-:mit '(✓. ... `<S • � ;i, W— f i rs 1 t . L y. f,. ` �•w-^^ ,�a_ . ,. < a aw .k c �-c1�;�,� �. I �� s i. � t_�, �t1� •Clt�C �-'�'�f t''`"•Nr• '-.- `� - rncrt t +' 1• 14355fi; � .� , t � r _ _i 3� _ _ �GyA t w1 • - �„� _ • '1 S� . `41q� ._:'iy`}l .`_• �.4 G r^�' `t --%^'f f" - s-.c3����y,�K i, r�l.^ A% � ' j•+t L`' �. �l ���i -,^,},_i = • .1432 Page 6 F:\Utilities\UTIUTY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\80th Ave Water Main Extension - UCPit 3337\Developers Agreement\Developers Agreement - Off -Site Watermain-Revs Aduna.docx P45 EXHIBIT -B DETAILED COST TABULATION FOR 14385 8e AVENUE WATER MAIN EXTENSION Item Description Estimated Quantity Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Price 1 Engineering 1 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 2 Permiting 1 EA $ 1,280.00 $ 1,280.00 3 Labor 1 LS $5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 4 Jumper -Installation & Removal 1 EA $1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 5 8" C900 PVC Pipe 300 LF $26.06 $ 7,818.00 6 8" Gate Valve 1 EA $2,083.00 $ 2,083.00 7 Double Service 1 EA $2,694.00 $ 2,694.00 4 Survey 1 $550.00 $ 550.00 5 Sod 1 $200.00 $ 200.00 Total Improvement Cost of 8- inch water main $ 23,725.00 Up size hydraulic fare share from 2 -inch to 8 -inch; 75% $17,79375 Developer's Share $13,048.75 Total Fare share cost for Adjacent Properties (14380,14390 & 14395) $ 10,676.25 Per Parcel Fare share cost for Adjacent Properties (14380,14390 & 14395) $3,558.75 Page 7 F:\Utilities\UTIUTy - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\80th Ave Water Main Extension - UCP# 3337\0evelopers Agreement\Developers Agreement - Off -Site Watermain-nevi Arjuna.doa P46 EXHIBIT -C LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS 14395 80th Ave, Sebastian, FL 32958 PARCEL ID 30382500001001000012.0: PBI 3-74; LOT 12 & PARCEL LYING BETWEEN - LOT 12 & BULKHEAD LINE AS R BK 390 PP 60 4 BLK A 14380 80th Ave, Sebastian, FL 32958 PARCEL ID 30382500001002000002.0: ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 1 - BLK B LOTS 2 & 5 PBI 3-74 14390 80th Ave, Sebastian, FL 32958 PARCEL ID 30382500001002000001.0: ERCILDOUNE HEIGHTS SUB NO 1- BLK B LOT 1 PBI 3-74 Page 8 F:\Utilities\UTIUTY- Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\80th Ave Water Main Extension - UCP# 3337\Developers Agreement\Developers Agreement - Off -Site Watermain-Revl Arjuna.doa P47 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES Date: December 1, 2017 To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services Prepared By: John M. Boyer, P.E., Utilities Engineer Subject: Approval of Change Order and Final Pay for Blue Goose Construction Work Authorization No. 2017-004 to Replace a Water Main in "Heron Cay' Mobile Home Park DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: During the May 9, 2017, meeting, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved Work Authorization #2017-004 for Blue Goose Construction (Contractor) to replace a water main in the "Heron Cay' mobile home park. The project commenced during October 2017 and has been completed under budget. Staff requests the BCC authorize final payment to the contractor. ANALYSIS: The reduction in contractor's labor cost is equal to the contingency in the work authorization. The direct - purchase cost of materials was also less than budget. Project costs are summarized in the table below. Original Approval Additions or Deletions Final Cost 1— Labor Expense: $ 59,334.17 $ (-5,394.02) $53,940.15 2 — Materials: $ 19,186.20 $ (-6,367.56) $12,818.64 Totals: $ 78,520.37 $(-11,761.58) $66,758.79 The amount due the contractor for the final pay request is $33,270.82. With previous payments totaling $20,669.33 the final labor total is $53,940.15. FUNDING: Funding forthis project is derived from the Capital Account in the Operating fund. The Operating fund budget is derived from water and sewer sales. ACCOUNT NAME ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT Heron Cay WM & Service Replacement 1 471-169000-17518 $78,520.37 P48 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the application for Final Pay in the amount of $33,270.82 to Blue Goose Construction, L.L.C. This final payment will relieve the County of any further obligations to the Contractor for Work Authorization No. 2017-004. ATTACHMENT(s): 1. Blue Goose Construction Invoice (2 pages) F:\Utilities\UTILITY - Engineering\Projects - Utility Construction Permits\IRC - Heron Cay - Longpointe WM RR\Admin\Agenda Item\17-1129 Final\AI WA 2017-007-CO.doa P49 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO.2 FINAL To: Indian River County Utilities �m �, From: Blue Goose Growers, LLC (CONTRACTOR) c Contract: — NOV 2 Y 2011 y PO #: Project: Heron Cay MHP - Longpointe Ct - WM & Service Replacement Received For Work completed through the date of November 15, 2017 F�nanc 6 7 8 Original Contract Price: Net change by Change Orders and Written Amendments (+ or Current Contract Price (1 plus 2) Total completed and stored to date: Retainage (per Agreement) of completed work of stored material $ Total Retainage: Total complete and stored to date less retainage (4 minus 5) Less previous Application for Payments DUE THIS APPLICATION (6 MINUS 71 / \\A 00o I —� i3 $ 59,334.17 59, 334.17 53,940.15 53,940.15 20 669.33 33.,270. ti CONTRACTOR'S Certification: The undersigned CONTRACTOR certifies that (1) all previous progress payments received from OWNER on account of Work done under the Contract referred to above have been applied on account to discharge CONTRACTOR's legitimate obligations incurred in connection with Work covered by prior Applications for Payment numbered 1 through 1 inclusive; (2) title of all Work, materials and equipment incorporated in said Work or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to OWNER at time of payment free and clear of all Liens, security interests and encumbrances (except such as are covered by a Bond acceptable to OWNER indemnifying OWNER.against any such Lien, security interest or encumbrance); and (3) all Work covered by this Application for Payment is in accordance with the Contract Documents and not defective. Dated: 1/. 20.1 9L State of nDykA(, County of S -k Lu c i 2 Blue Goose Growers, LLC CONTRACTOR By: . nVWKL�_ Greg Hampton, ontroll Subscribeda d sworn to befor me this Z- day of 0 D ✓ e-f*K 61( 2017 Notary Public�"Y"`"" My Commission expires: Payment of the above AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION is recommended. Dated: A MY CA &WSION t FF9458't9 EXPIRES: December 22.2619 8uded Thm Nofary PWk Und1=1W ENGI By: �— P50 w � G a NOV 21 20P gReceived ance N fR Ed T a 0 _o 9 CL J "VHIT�-- P51 �, oo•' o g o 00 m oC C 00 ...o o a oo.co 0 o 0 0 d mso 0o O o === s = p p c q c m T w 0 G m MON N O M Q MO w m, N Q MOO Oto O m O w M Pm w Q m w g m m QO m O 12 E H l'1 l7 m lh n o MO 11,91-1 s o0001 0 ' YI Q m a o -o = o Qt 0 0 o 0 F • a O N m • F = S Q � c mgr mo og • ati< V M v� m N m O MQ w 0 a N O pg M A m F �Mw a m G a h . p tON0O a O m O�mM 0 110 6 Q — P m 0 oo M S O O O O OS O O r p 'c EO C1G01. V1 W O •C• HI.y.M Y1RA Q� M. Atli �'w M Q M OP O Q p M Nm NM W MW N WNNtq M(q Mw W N ff77 N 7 t L mm N10o m 0 0` go a oPt�n m o m . laic N vN C Q ; Q N Cl m I rypV .JJ JJ W QQ W W QQQ W WW QQ LL N f4 W zO O pp M O Q S C11 O e � •0 ul C a r m � 3 m 4mm � 3 5 0 Ol eFg{ C n m p G a0 m m to • H m�� b8 fn 9 em a pR41 c>>m d c7 tWpm y pmn 3 C S c41 N �C7C7sa m m r tr c _�F'Uo m oiU c c me ,s c = �n EE w � G a NOV 21 20P gReceived ance N fR Ed T a 0 _o 9 CL J "VHIT�-- P51 Office of Consent 12112117 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY Dylan Reingold, County Attorney William K DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney DATE: December 7, 2017 ATTORNEY SUBJECT: Assumption and Joinder to Agreement for Food Concession Services and Lease at Sandridge Golf Club On March 10, 2015, the Board approved an Agreement for Food Concession Services and Lease (Agreement) between the County and Di'Michelli's Catering, Inc., (Di'Michelli's) for operation of the 1,705 square foot food service facility within the Sandridge Golf Club clubhouse. The Agreement is in full force and effect and will expire on April 1, 2020, but may be renewed for five additional one year periods. Staff is satisfied with Di'Michelli's performance under the Agreement. The owner and President of Di'Michelli's, Juliann Petticrew, is also the owner and President of Bottom's Up Beverage of Florida, LLC, (Bottom's Up). In order to provide easier banking and financial operations for Ms. Petticrew, she has asked to have Bottom's Up assume and join in the Agreement as a fully responsible co -tenant. Bottom's Up would be added. as a party to the Agreement, joining in on all benefits and liabilities of the Agreement. Future payments under the Agreement will be made to and received from Bottom's Up. No other changes are contemplated to the Agreement. Staff has no objection to Bottom's Up assuming and joining in on the Agreement. FUNDING: 'This matter has no impact to County funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the Assumption and Joinder to Agreement for Food Concession Services and Lease at Sandridge Golf Club and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached Assumption and Joinder to Agreement on behalf of the Board. Attachments: Assumption and Joinder to Agreement for Food Concession Services and Lease Copies to: Michael Zito, Assistant County Administrator Bela Nagy, Director of Golf Juliann Petticrew P52 ASSUMPTION AND JOINDER TO AGREEMENT FOR FOOD CONCESSION SERVICES AND LEASE BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND DrMICHELLI'S CATERING, INC. THIS ASSUMPTION -AND JOINDER to Agreement for Food Concession Services and Lease is entered into this day of December, 2017, by and between Bottom's Up Beverage of Florida, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, 857 South Kings Highway, Ft. Pierce, FL 34945 (Bottom's Up); and Indian River County, a political .subdivision of the State of Florida, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960, (the "County") as of the date set forth below as the effective date (the "Effective Date'D. BACKGROUND FACTS WHEREAS, the County is the owner of Sandridge Golf Club, 5300 73rd Street, Vero Beach, Florida, 32967 (the "Course") which includes a 1,705 square foot food service facility operated within the Sandridge Golf Club clubhouse; and WHEREAS, the County and Di'Michelh's Catering, Inc.,, (Di'Michelli's) entered into an Agreement for Food Concession Services and Lease (Agreement) dated March 10, 2015 to operate the food service facility. The Agreement is in full force and effect and will expire on April 1, 2020, but may be renewed for five additional one year periods; and WHEREAS, Bottom's Up Beverage of Florida, LLC, (Bottom's Up) is owned by the same entity and operated by the same officer as De'Michelli's Catering, Inc., and WHEREAS, Bottom's Up is desirous to assume and join in the Agreement as a fully responsible co -tenant; and WHEREAS, having Bottom's Up as a party on the Agreement will provide for easier banking and financial operations for Di'Michelli's; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the County and Di'Michelli's that Bottom's Up be added as a party and co -tenant to the Agreement, joining in on all benefits and liabilities of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, Bottom's Up contact information regarding this Assumption and Joinder is: FOR COUNTY: FOR BOTTOM'S UP: Indian River County Bottom's Up Beverage of Florida, LLC 1801 27t' Street 857 South Kings Highway Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Ft. Pierce, FL 34945 TELEPHONE: (772) 770-5003 TELEPHONE: (772) 528-8095 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived from this agreement and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound agree as follows: P53 1. Background Facts. The above Background Facts are true and correct are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Assumption and Joinder. Bottom's Up hereby assumes and joins- in on each and every term and condition of the Agreement dated March 10, 2015. 3. Payments. From the date of this Agreement, the County shall remit all payments under the Agreement made payable to: Bottom's Up Beverage of Florida, LLC 857 South Kings Highway Fort Pierce, FL 34945 The County, Di'Michelli and Bottom's Up have caused these presents to be executed in their names the year and day first written above. For Di'Michelli's: Juliann.Petticrew, President Di'Michelli's Catering, Inc. For Bottoms Up: Juliann Petticrew, President Bottom's Up Beverage of Florida, LLC Approved as to form and egal sufficiency I , X, William K. eBraal Deputy County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Peter D. O'Bryan, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Approved by the BCC: ATTEST: Jeffrey R. Smith, Clerk of Court and Comptroller 2 Deputy Clerk of Court APPROVED: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator P54 Leslie R. Swan Supervisor ofEleetions Indian River County November 29, 2017 The Honorable Peter O'Bryan Chairman Board of County Commissioners Indian River County 180127th Street, Building A Vero Beach FL 32960 Dear Commissioner O' Bryan: G. A. The Supervisor of Elections office conducted an election on November 7th for the City of Sebastian and the City of Vero Beach. The municipalities have reimbursed the Supervisor of Elections office for the cost of conducting these elections. The city revenues received from both municipalities total $61,324. I am requesting to have the city revenues we received from conducting the November municipal elections to be rolled into our 2017/2018 general operating budget. These elections costs_ were not accounted for in our initial 2017/2018 budget. Should you have any questions regarding the appropriation- of these funds please do not hesitate to contact me. Most sincerely, Leslie R. Swan Supervisor of Elections 4375 43'd Avenue- VeroBeach,_FaL 32967 I Office: (772) 226-3440 Fax: (772)17�0_-'5-367.:,I uvww.voteindianriver.com. P55 INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: 955 82nd Avenue, Vero Beach Paul Fafeita SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: Oslo Boat Ramp PHONE: 772-562-5978 IS A DIGITAL/ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION PLANNED? F-1 YES FX I NO IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION F-1 YES Fx I NO WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU No action on Oslo Road REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? F-1 YES FX I NO WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form E -Mail X Hand Delivered Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: MEETING DATE: Jason E. Brown December 12, 2017 Docum nt2 P56 1b, X3.2. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Ardra Rigby and Bill Rigby ADDRESS: 8465 591' Avenue PHONE: 772-501-4753 SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: Demolitions in West Wabasso Community IS A DIGITAL/ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION PLANNED? F-1 YES Fx I NO IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION F-1 YES FX1 NO WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU Residents of West Wabasso would like to be informed of all REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? demolitions in West Wabasso Community ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? F-1 YES F-1 NO WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form E -Mail x Hand Delivered Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: MEETING DATE: Jason E. Brown December 12, 2017 DOcun nL P57 (0, 2, ; INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION REQUEST TO BE SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION Any organization or individual wishing to address the Board of County Commission shall complete this form and submit it to the Indian River County Administrator's Office. PUBLIC DISCUSSION INFORMATION Indian River County Code Section 102.04(10)(b): as a general rule, public discussion items should be limited to matters on which the commission may take action Indian River County Code Section 102.07(2): limit remarks to three minutes unless additional time is granted by the commission NAME OF INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION: Pastor Ervin Cartwright ADDRESS: Submitted by Ardra Rigby for Pastor Cartwright PHONE: SUBJECT MATTER FOR DISCUSSION: Demolitions in West Wabasso Community IS A DIGITAL/ELECTRONIC PRESENTATION PLANNED? F-1 YES Fx —1 NO IS THIS AN APPEAL OF A DECISION F-1 YES Fx I NO WHAT RESOLUTION ARE YOU Residents of West Wabasso would like to be informed of all REQUESTING OF THE COMMISSION? demolitions in West Wabasso Community ARE PUBLIC FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES REQUIRED? F-1 YES F-1 NO WHAT FUNDS OR ACTIVITIES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THIS REQUEST? Transmitted to Administrator Via: Interactive Web Form E -Mail x Hand Delivered Phone COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: MEETING DATE: Jason E. Brown December 12; 2017 P58 I2_A.1, INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA MEMORANDUM TO: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator THROUGH: Stan Boling, AICP Community Development Director FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICP Chief, Long -Range Planning DATE: November 27, 2017 RE: Consideration of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan Annual Report Card for 2017 It is requested that the following information be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of December 12, 2017. DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS From May 2013 through July 2014, the county performed an update of the 2002 Gifford Neighborhood Plan. The updated plan was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on July 15, 2014. That plan was the culmination of a grass roots effort by the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, Gifford residents, and Indian River County to improve the quality of life and economic conditions for Gifford residents. Through considerable interaction with residents of Gifford at community meetings, county staff prepared the neighborhood plan which presents a strategy and a series of actions to address issues, concerns, and opportunities identified by Gifford residents. Approval of the plan committed the Board (as well as other responsible parties) to undertake specific actions identified in the "action plan" section of the overall neighborhood plan. Action 1.5 of the plan states the following: "Each year, through 2020, the County Planning Division will provide a Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014 action plan/implementation plan "report card" to the Progressive Civic League of Gifford and will present the report card to the Board of County Commissioners at a Board of County Commissioners meeting". This report and the attached implementation matrix "report card" constitute the fourth annual report card for the Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014, and has been provided to the Progressive Civic League of Gifford. The Board is now to review the attached Gifford Neighborhood Plan annual report card for 2017. P59 ANALYSIS The Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014 is a 108 page plan that contains an introduction and description of the planning process, data (existing conditions), analysis, action plan, implementation and funding sections, and appendices containing reference information including a history of Gifford. Following its July 15, 2014 approval, the plan has been implemented as specified in the plan's action plan and implementation sections. • Action Plan The action plan section (strategies, objectives, and actions) is "the heart" of the neighborhood plan (attachment # 2). As structured, the action plan contains 15 objectives that relate to major issues and topics identified during community meetings. Following is the list of the neighborhood plan objectives in the order presented in the plan: 1. Communication/Coordination 2. Housing Rehabilitation/Property Maintenance 3. Demolition/Repair of Dilapidated and Unsafe Structures 4. Housing Ownership 5. Economic Development/Employment/Technical Training 6. Illegal Uses, Non -conformities, and Land Use Compatibility 7. Sidewalk Improvements 8. Street Maintenance 9. 45th Street/ MLK Blvd "Main Street" Beautification and Improvements 10. Traffic/Safety Improvements 11. Drainage Improvements 12. Street Lighting 13. Park Improvements 14. Funding 15. Crime Prevention/ Law Enforcement. Under each objective, there is a set of specific actions that contribute to meeting the objective. Each action item identifies a specific action, a responsible party or parties, and either a completion date (year) or an indication that the action is to be implemented on an on-going basis. Responsible parties identified in the action plan include: the Planning Division, the Public Works Department, the Parks Division, Code Enforcement, the Progressive Civic League of Gifford, the School Board, Indian River State College, Road and Bridge, Traffic Engineering, Indian River Farms Water Control District, the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), the Health Department, the Sheriffs Office, the County Attorney's Office, and the Indian River County Chamber of Commerce. Overall, the plan contains 82 specific actions. Community Development Department staff has coordinated with all responsible departments, entities, and the Progressive Civic League of Gifford to ensure implementation of the plan's actions. As shown on the attached "report card" matrix (attachment # 1), of the 82 actions in the plan, 25 had 2014, 2015, 2016, or 2017 due dates and all of those actions were completed or are in progress. 2 P60 Four actions with 2017 due dates that are in progress are listed below with reasons why they are not yet implemented and are assigned with new completion due dates. "Action 7.3 — By 2017, the County Public Works Department will repair, connect, and construct the sidewalk along 45th Street, from 43rd Avenue to U.S. #1 and by 2021 along 45th from 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue, where necessary right-of-way is available (has been acquired). The County will seek to install segments of a 4516 Street sidewalk between 43rd Avenue and 58th Avenue prior to 2021." The 45th Street sidewalk was repaired and/or replaced as part of the Phase I $1.8 million dollar 45th Street Beautification project from 43`d Avenue to just west of the railroad tracks. The segment from the railroad tracks to US -1 has been delayed due to All Aboard Florida/FEC's slow response in providing an agreement to widen 451h Street and add sidewalk crossings. Recently, an agreement was provided by the FEC with a fee of over $730,000. In January 2018 Public Works will bring the proposed agreement to the BCC for action. If BCC action on the proposed agreement is favorable, then the bidding process will start for the construction of the improvements from the railroad track to US -1, as the design is complete. Based on the delay in receiving a proposed crossing agreement from the FEC, the 2017 completion date for the first part of action 7.3 should be changed to 2018. The segment of 45th Street from 43`d Avenue to 58th Avenue will be designed by a consultant to be determined through the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process which has been started. This segment has FDOT funding that is not available until 2020 — 2021. In addition, an existing asphalt segment of the 45th Street sidewalk just east of 43`d Avenue will be re-evaluated for replacement as part of the Phase II 45th Street Beautification project. "Action 13.6 — By 2016, the County will prepare plans, seek FDEPIEPA approval, and seek funding for redevelopment of the 41' Street Old Landfill Site for community andlor recreational uses. " County Solid Waste Disposal District and Planning staff coordinated with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCR -PC) for preparation of a redevelopment plan for the old landfill site. Several community meetings have been held to obtain citizen input on a redevelopment plan. It is anticipated that the redevelopment conceptual plan will be finalized in 2018 and funding can be sought for one or more phases of the plan. Therefore, the completion date of the action 13.6 should be changed to 2018. "Action 11.7 — By 2017, the County Public Works Department will coordinate with the Indian River Farms Water Control District and develop a scope of work for culverting the canal on the south side of 45Th Street, east of 43rd Avenue, in segments and as a whole project. In addition, after a scope of work for culverting is developed, the County and MPO will seek funding for culverting improvements." This action is in Progress. A task order for project design was approved by the BCC in August 2017. The design project is for culverting the 45th Street canal from 28th Court to 43`d Avenue; the design is being provided by a contracted engineering firm; and the project is being managed by the Public Works Department. Because the design work may not be completed for a few months, the 3 P61 completion date of action 11.7 should be changed to 2018. "Action 11.8 — By 2017, the County's Public Works Department will coordinate with the Indian River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), identify any appropriate safety barriers along canals in Gifford that are warranted by accident data and that the District will allow, and report its findings to the Board of County Commissioners and the Progressive Civic League of Gifford. Findings shall include an evaluation of culverting improvements associated with Action 9.3. " This action is in progress. Public Works Department needs additional time to coordinate with the Indian River Farms Water Control District (lRFWCD) to identify appropriate safety barriers along canals. The completion date of action 11.8 should be changed to 2018. There are 42 ongoing actions in the plan that require periodic implementation. All 42 ongoing actions have been completed and continue to be implemented (100%), including on-going communication between staff, community leaders, and community residents. Larger projects called for in the action plan, such as the 45th Street beautification project, were completed ahead of schedule. With that project, staff from several departments "stepped up" to obtain funding, design project, obtain easements, adjust or expand project scope, and implement construction of improvements. Following is a summary of the implementation of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan actions. Action Timeframe # of Actions Actions Implemented Actions in Progress Action Not Due Yet Ongoing 42 42 ---- ---- Completion date between 2014-2017 25 21 4 ---- Completion date after 2017 15 3 ---- 12 Total 82 66 4 12 • History Recognized/History Made In the spirit of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan, this report card includes mention of a recent event in Gifford. On October 21, 2017, "Gifford Park" was officially re -named after community icon Mr. Victor Hart Sr. (see photo below). The park is now called "Victor Hart Sr. Community Enhancement Complex". Among Mr. Hart's many accomplishments over the years that have positively impacted Gifford, Indian River County, and beyond, has been his early and ongoing commitment to and instrumental role in supporting the Gifford Neighborhood Plan. 4 P62 'VIC:T-O R HA RT -SR's s C.°om b u_nity;,E'nhanceme.nt. Com.pl FUNDING Implementation of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2014 will continue to require use of various current and future funding sources. Funding sources will include the General Fund, gas taxes, sales taxes, the MSTU, grants, and other appropriate funding sources. Beginning in 2014, larger projects in Gifford were incorporated into the County's Capital Improvements Element (CIE) and that practice continued in 2015, 2016, and 2017. An updated copy of the Gifford Neighborhood Plan Schedule of Capital Improvements 2017 is attached (attachment #3). CONCLUSION The neighborhood plan's "action plan' section contains a total of 82 actions; each action is related to an objective and is structured to identify a specific task, a responsible party or parties, and a completion date or indication that implementation is on-going. For the 2017 "report- card"' period, all actions with a 2014, 2015, 2016, or 2017 due date and all ongoing actions have been completed or is in progress. Where appropriate, updated completion dates have been added to certain "in -progress" items as described in this report. R P63 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners review and accept the Gifford Neighborhood Plan 2017 implementation report card. ATTACHMENTS 1. Implementation Matrix "2017 Report Card" 2. Action Plan (strategies, objectives, and actions) 3. Gifford Neighborhood Plan Schedule of Capital Improvements 2017 FACommunity Development\Gifford Plan\StaffReports\GNP 2017 Report Card- BCC agenda item 12-12-2017.doc on P64 ^C a� a� 0 U �o r V uCC C C C C C C C C C C C C C A o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O c c c c c c c c c H o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •� ;~ 0 U r � .� Cd = O u czL. U cvU s w 0 Q a(Z �. a a �. �. o o On • L rA U o..E 0 E E E E o a� o a� o o i awU s o t o s o t o s o 0 c 0 c 0 c 0 c ce u UU UUUUUUUw uwiuwuw uW10< � O La ppp E U VV E U O ' C',N 4� - U y A = E U 'C = W= c� w o o c U O U c Q 0 a� 0 EN a�.] 0sm - O ,a w O i w •LQ. O N o 0 0 o cJ c m a. �'co O U •L •G OL Q U N U U .L = U E U Q C G% GL .= U C L D C > n Q L U p a -0 a) 'C . 'v • E U L>, U O L TS C L Q c [� ¢Z, ° c a.mwn. 0 0 0=-,wwUtn 0 0 -o c o 3 o UQU o 0 o c o o Ur�U 0 c o wU ct � C O mt V') 00 - N M k N - M P65 P66 -v a� a� -a � o U � •p � �n o r.+ C/� v • �, N � VCC C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C A o 0 o O o 0 0 o O o o O o o O O bD aq on on an an an an aq on on an an on aq on C c •p C •p C •p C •p c c c C C c C C c C C C .r .p 'p 'p 'p 'O 'p 'p 'p O O •O •O H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L y o'c3 L 3 3 L 3 cd mnv a ow Q C.) _ ° v 3 7 3 C cd V un O �• 0 0 0 a O E � •r •,C � `1 � •••' � � � Cd Cd cd cd Cd cd cd L s � cu = C vs C U y N cn O En a O O cd -pZDiCd U O bA �_ d= O cd C bCA O C a� C Q 3 f o c L c �+' O M E �, C O o +- o o i" EU a. �w G. p L> cd a� cd C C LL. N 3 O N N p Q i° i f1. C W= C U to p O CC10 C_ y L ° �� O .y t+. . O N N C C C— U p �' �� N Q = O V C•= w a +, -2 cd y C cn ccn C C C.— cd p O C. �- C i H a� DO�C��m�C7v�wQz° cd 4-. cd cd 4"' c, rn N i N OU=Cn� O V O = Cd���a.zQ�_c��.�C�a.F- O N � O C C ° O cd cC Ln ¢a. i C: O M N �.--• V) \G N M � M � •-- N v1 — — N N P66 M P67 Q id r.n O �V o v �n _ C bA = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O bA bA bA bA bA bA bA bA bA bA bA bA C C C C C C � O O C OO C to O O O O O O O O O H O O w O O O O 0 00 0 00 O N O rq o s U L O u rA Cl o'a3 v ° 3 33 3 E Gi y C V] U. L LL U U N °' •� own own � � a� •2 •L 72 L •L � � � _ •� 0 � m m m O O O � � __ C _ . _ . = U t CC C� CC CyC}.•+ U L _ _ •- O O o s s un s rn L C E- w O C U ci . _ o 0 U - c a=i — �e bA 0 os '' ,' y L -0 O C -� O c L= ct a� E L�.0 o o 0 o p oc (n m E Z} CL N s' iC ° O/ 3 +_ cl cz N= S (11)i O 'GO U R. L- Ln sU s0 L V O Y . y¢ 3 O O C - O L. uU =4. U O C ° .4 O� —1 U '_ �v+ ° • V O V hG i o o °0�oO 'dE C EO . -a4_ 'oy>a/� CO G ° . p— � �°cC 0 O OV] u t>> M O, ma/ O. _O. mO .° UO U'� .T�O. Qa/no cu/Ma) Q r/ c W • Ac '2 ^ M C� is O V N v 'll O M C� V1 kn 00 00 00 M �O M P67 'C a� a� E ++ o r 0 N 0 N 0 N O C) O U G) C) 4] U U U 4) U d] U O O O o O o O o O o O o O O bA C H O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O .r r 'rii _O U D o 0 00 o=n 3 3 on a o. 0 O -a i o -o v O v O a� CXm _ .OO = .- ti rn L U rn O O N U ,7 o. L V) fn r^ V E _ U U p _ U 'i. t OO= c� c� _ s U U U LUa. a aU. a. a a. a a=. v� � r_ L = L U U 'Gy � O = i- o _ n. o r to a� N _ _¢ o -a _ _ O L r.+ In L •� = C� _ O O CC 4 O U 0 !n Qi ce y • C}., cn iC N L +— ¢ 'oy r->, iE O E O > > m Ua C U- oO co s -0 V Q U cd -0 d=i o.C _coo m mV 70 ' U 73 ELL o U d> v •�= cn O 30 � � S _�s�o 00 �.� � CS CA UQCcn C�wQ� o LL. 30�¢¢��Nv�U= _ a 0 V _ N M 01 �n M 01 M V•1 kn N 01 P68 W', P69 ° s •� � -o a, o U Q o N U'200 L N a > U o 00 n O rte+ -p 0.00c�C N=O C U y moo > N ° U ca. n r E c 00 i d U CZ rp+ p r O 0 �j.., = CCS > UZ y y=_ ti O U O r t kn L L L O S t: U L CU � 00 V O O O L1 p a p^> 0.s b=AN O� UO oj O 0 H O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O N N N N N N N _ U > 3 ce 3 � G. c � '� o •L c7 u a� aim cz a. _—U a0.CC]0.Of U = 0.� 3. U Vi V1 N cz 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 d L c� U O O ^ 42 �_ b4 _ ° c cqj Q 3 kr) _ -v 3 N 00 Ln > U= T U U = co E as o a, 0n 4- C �t CLO a o > >, > 4 U> C� O L Cn cis� a cCm. a :r U O> y c CD QQ. U 00 3 Mce U «2 U 3 = U N U p O > N N i i O ' cd = O _° _ U CC GJ +' • O CC > cOC U J CC y C� •� L �C (3 L = O = �°NWv� fn S L Q. L ,�-+ a > = L s. i+ -°C1�o =��'�'' a _O a L L "' 0�° v� _ �Q�Uci� �C��Q vn M-Uc » C ,O V 00 N M O M M N M M N Cl? W', P69 P70 E U a s L U E s E1Q.0 3 a40 ° c E 0-0 ao o o '0 s �•�L �>, ->Q,o E o CL a' C _ Ln N C cC O O cz >' C co ct / a r �, U CZ O o (A a� -v °� L c c 3 C13 _ a O o= 'd _ C ;? C C O U. p V a OC13 V u E c m CL �' � >, E ,, u U U o -v o a L*la u ° � s U n E c ca Q° cL v, p -0 > > Cq y.� Q 4"' _, Q E O rA En O N C M O= S O O vi S bA •,,, �' ° ' _ �, a� O a� a m E • E � L -v o o • E _ � � -v � L o a� o 3 m _ °L' os ao o = C's oA c •r O O O O O N O N O N O O ■p O G C � O V a� •� L O L O L O L O L p v, � c 3 3 to 3 3 3 y •^' � � O � � X 0 0 O O E � � ° � � L >, C L• O ,,E L cz v1 U r..+ cU E S ��+ O s -0 l.i. b•' U C� U U 0 cz F- ° °_° O a) cd o L >� y On cz M Ln O V) O ca H ° wLIL,Z5 <ce �mC� L E E U- E O •r �"' O000 N V 1 N M N P70 0 O b T 0 LT - P71 3 0 a C) = L .:1 � E O 'C O N � D C. .0 O N O O a u cC = > ° ° C�� E �. 3 d Lo -moo V 0 oo C .� cq 0 H N 0 N 0 N = L c � 3 d U _ V ca O y M L -Sd w s � � �� �•ts ce a. �s �•_ =' _o t: > O cd m0 L a 0 00 00 t� 0 O b T 0 LT - P71 ,1-_ 3-. Cd an bCd a) a� �; a) oN o c od,U, U •O O q U cL)>, CA a 4� O a. ca (L)a� s.lz cam, 3 Cd cz ° 0 W ca c/� U a � co U O O vi w 'U U41.1-6 OU m3 >�a �.. 0 R u y P, .U, ccti o >, U 4. 0 L 0L> �>>,, cdrA O a >" O bA • C +� bA O O C C> vOi w � � U� •^ C h > p o p,4.0as bo 'v� 't3 _ p•, h p .D U O 42, 0, eq 3 d o a En .ti 0 � 4° . � PC ow�b fj ° ani is �'� � O. O •— y > N O � �, � O 'ti � ° 08 ca macN o V) c� a �^ �� U co O ^p vai O '. U Ln C C p L i O vi moi. 0 • ° A 0 0 0 O p O a� w O .0 45+= ca 4 3 cC cd C7 tV o s..ty 2 C "CS OO .a "C7 U O Gn C R C � +'O i1 cli vUi U LZ. CdU C w�O 3caH aaCdw Chi W U 0 U ca c 0 E Q. 0 Q �c E E 0 U P72 del 0 cq 'C� u� u +� "C cq y •O bD� Cw ,O a C.� bn> it Lp. E � .0 .0 O U m V P V C r.+ =PC Ca u CL 6� •C V O � y o .. � 6 0 12w PC 10 o cw PC CC t7 O •^• +/i "D "C L a a •C on b u C ++ ps PC "C L �' C C PC c° •C '° o -aa•C P73 �. 4" bD O N V �a d p U O ❑ cd 00 �c 4�. cd03 ij Ca �, 3 .d 0 N rcd U O t 7 ,� L1 00co 0 O U E co '+ N cG v�� vOi C N O O '- Z O cd O O 'b by O N C ILI a0- UCIO 9b N CIS °H -o U ti c o n. cv ° o V; 42 S b 3 3 0 En CIS o 3 r2al bn > a�a "C,3° O �^ O 7d (� U to > Oi O -p O i".. O E U .� C U a a�� �� 'cn a3o " >° •N o o a o o °IZO N o b p, :o ' o ° 00 rz: > 0 E a, U •) O U �' O ami O 0 V U to C O p O ,r 'd c� N O .� •b bA ° O (� 0 .0 3 — Q 3 co E U C C '.O 'v, a oo•-�s t Hwy 0cn r, O N oM ,� +� ai �? O o f o o o w 1 o GU d2 d"N dE. d09• dp.0 U P73 o p C ° � w .0 a � •� "O � C � � •v H � bA O o `�° C cn .. � •fl w y � w PC Pc zn C � iU.+ y O POC •� z u y w :� aa. •� •� o *5 b 10', 9Dej W CC •7 Vim. •� "C L 4! �' O V O 3 p a 6�y �C�.Cw �U v, w rcA .+ C C �O w bA i0, i. C y y •� ul a a C w A,� •C a •C C � y C � (� O O � � •m bA � L O aw r� b + b y G� 6j U �" L W C C � ee = C7 0 0 _ .r o U c ° •O v, •p A PC d C v C4 a R 6 m ami 'C O 'C v, C eC w b PC �•atzCA c o PCw O. v Q O p.y,'C vi a� P74 o U O U O C) Q, ° ,D O U � Cd Cd ►" C w o O GD rn U f� as w _O as W 'O Cd Cd E y b _O CC40 O cz OU w 0 cd w N C cd lz .�, o .o 3w° O ° U .fin O U O vi o a 0 O O E a O N O O O +� zi bD P74 b cd 0 w N 0 'b 'U t U w d 0 = cn b N . O O .5= N o 'C3 O cd_0ojd0 w a� b cp c7 r^ �.' w cn >, cn O .`N f 0 O p cd U p O N U a• N aA U O co > y ^~ cz °o a 10 In0CC3 N cn V 3 cd £ Q —CdQ too 0 >' O 0 pd_ U ed U t. to 0 w o w° p. 4'�° 3 �o i 'b ° En •tf cd N •0 to CO to ^O b U U U Os, N w O .� b a, Cd to 0 71 ti t j a0i 'O . CZ ; v) 0 O Q 00p. U N O 4 4, U cd C U N k b w O •N a3 gib' C14 0�� 03 x U a� x � U co •e �, N 0 i o n �� w U 3 0 va� o 0 3 0� o �? a' °o En 3 ° c ani C7 V,, a� cd 2 3'n a o 0 0 d o -o W.oU U + •� � q U U `� � o -D a uo� � y cd C-) C Q. a'' b N rn p �' +�w �3 4. o ° '0 �° °�° t7 vob ocn 0 v o .k - d — ti 9 U O .n 3 d-0 d"0 CN r o N a0i ON U a bi W GA Q -0 A L.?? 0 'L3 D O 0 0 O 0 °O MCO 0 .r 0' 0 0 U¢ Q �i ~ tU+ N cd O �'? U 0 rn 'd N N 03 N w M O t�U M 'd O ,U <' U M U QO U QUO G U 3 Ua� N o o0�•N o 0 p C Oo0Uo,N OO 0 00 .L°y o�. E N 0 9 C M U ..0 �Q-0> i U P75 0 o is - o= 1— C o= u >, "o >, 0 00 Q4� R O o C p '' O CC3 H > + C ,� u °� u ami +• cri >, +� ._ O O tn t� 'r O .r > N U O R �, •p C 4 u R C p CGU y o u 'fl O ti iR. C O C }„ .i7 i. N � cd O C7 Oa� UC w04) or iU >o ,ti 3 >d o p p onW '° c PC a o •v = > a T1 M co�U u a o O> bp a° d C U ,O cl m auuCaq= w U> a e�C •� ^O C O (Oi, "O O i, .0 C cd 3° ,� a o R u co= e° o o v W •C �: ^C a u O a �C cto U p w S >, >, cC W a, "o a w c .� o a. ,fl o 0 ca ,. .. ¢ o >, o o rte] PC U U y W C C p �v0, u ~ G ani U t`Q R u u a y ,� u �,a aCi �" C cd V ^ C C +�+ a w U ° +' Q Q v ''' y a u E H O .0 - u u `° °° co' W a, a 8> AC1 0 u o a� a PC o i bA Z°'°•oo C ac, O ° fj C° c0 M o im o � �° � a a a� d 'a L' • O '° u 'fl W w° a c`�i o Q o u>,U = R K a . - 42 N 40 C ++ a U' C7 vCO 0 O r>"+ bA O a' +� p C 'p > y u N p O¢ E Q a. Q u W w u'�,.� P76 N cd o C7 � o~ � ocis o a. o > o .o Cd3 �. � u ca ate`" �h3 b o Q E o co `� -0o o L) C U 0 o a� 'a � 0 o.� o1.v C7 L2 Cd °o U o = cd a) O c -0 io .ti ° w o :3 a 0 0 od a) ° o oas 0 N 10 3 o -0 o o a ° 'o o° 3 O -a ao c co co ° ajo ,� o os a� o a� o -� p�q o 0 0 co o Q c i�. > U b 0.° x Y V) o o cd o U 3o 0 ami ti v ° N v '' c� .a 0 .� U ° 0 > u cid a) ° ° to > ` aoi ° 'a -� 4r cd to A o o C3. ° c Q ° ° � 0 C's`n°0. ci � �� 4aoi x °Q, o v, N >, O ami ami ° cnn aNi A c+ , O o cd 0 7 a. -a Ul a� w a� C7 0 3 to ° o ti`s � 4, Cd , t1 o O_ 'b ,� ^a o v O c 03 U o , ao OE E 'N ° a+O cO -0 to o aOao o oo O 0 2 �. U o fn U �j ' C7 a C aoi co cis , o '> . O cd 2^3� cO O O cis U) cd >CO Cd p O ti .� y c'j v O c'� O O �' 0 O A U y G N +, r.O A 9, p -0 U 4J .011 4) 0cn �1 0� a NaO >, N : co� No ¢, U = Oa I co z ^� � E N 4" cn �} O cn Io p fj [— b oo ti ON U p rn Q .b pp W) cd cn v1 +�+ to cd to CE• cn N v 1 p ctS v � ' � +' cn o b o Q' 0 3 0 0 0 o N o g O° O; O Q O E .; ; 'a v o ° ° 'a ° 3 ° ° °, ° a ° ° a� ° � o Z3 Q °� d 3 Q d t� cd Q o Q d.a ° v P77 O v 'C Gam) •C7 R = r/' rn O G> rn w t, 'a = -0 N Q t�O, O •� E C O a p "a w •6� O O CA it •,•-o•, ice, R a v1 PC lz crj ZA CA PC 10 •� -o t7 ° :.d ,.., R 's � � anti e°°c � i " .� � � � PC ° pP= O a R E R .O O O .� O a w w w a" O> C O C cd QI • • O p ; L. G > ice. p. � «t on � � C = p o slu a mow° a. 0 W� c c aw o`er' E >' " '° y PC 0 a N U !,' G O R O = R L rn w iRr a•cl)E ° �Hw a ..C PC ,� ►.a C; R R a uR °' o > 4-1 "Cl u R � Oneaa � r.,o � � b o 3 3 �;N U m a ° po Or 0 PC 0 r PS 0 PZ p 0 p V w~ G Q w O N GUN r.U ti R rV� z(z cz fes. •s U �., O •> PC u U '> 4. .3 O O RPC u R '� 0 aP= 0 0 0 u 0 Z rn CCC "d 0 C7 •� N Z 7 u= +r 3 o aai a� C7 10 co ow PC -19 w y R R 4- — W E ^., a� L R C i° U to Baa � RE Ec, o 3 0 � as PC V a� a� R o c s a� �• � a .a o a E .. � �, ci R L. 6 C3..^ v 3 U R . u > O O O G E .. y, U NN+ R U U U Q U P78 r'7 116 O co a o -o C cl cl rncj cn w co L. E �, a Ewa• A U 04) IV ' •q "�C p bD N O dA bA N X s, .x u 7 N rho. ' co N ¢ a .o °' w d Sv ov°� 40. o cd y o y� Envi -0 �+ ^� L v, 00 3 �o E o cl a0i u > U)0 co r- E� o w a a °u e'a Ln OU �+ O U► L4 'C S 3 a m o 6 R�s�.ryo c a0 � an O C as �wa, "C CA .� w y O .M cd 00 c O C O pq � a, L R on 'O > co .'nox 'b O� cd ai : :: 'v p. U i a 42 cs R CAC = r, Cl -SU U 6 ��U s�U• 4j +T 0,2 l 'y w O 'b V a M y C O W C cd N Ef) PC 34 rA �pq U A .� C U N Off+ •p PE r d0 ed v o W - ami U U a pa 0 'r Oct ; > •� Z; 4 Xt Qan E c as eae lm P79 4403 Cd tn w id id yCd p d .� > 3 bn > C1 7i O ti 4r_ C14 0 = 3 >mib N O N O >, 0 O >, �C + C's > O r o+ .O ° U cd t' COA U 'd O U c� b > Cd cFy $ L O cd btr) 'fl Qcl >'cd U C U W c co p a > U o b d M ¢ 3:4) o3ba 0 a ° M N a� � v' E CO on o °' °'� ryo ' a o o"a 0ns � .... o v Ln Lir y >❑❑> 3 y. ; cd 00 C@ to U co W) r7 CZ ani ° c N 0 b p C7 on o Cd 0 OJ 4� cm � > a) o 00 ar a°i 3 cri cid ap c� o U o00 3 _O o Q °o y N� AL .- ° M on O0-4 Ob cl cd N b O U > U t�. U .O y O 'a U C y u C's•�U in U .:. cidCd cd 3 cd cd ONO ON -- >, u '� O U (Don ' U ciE C U cd v c `O o' 3 NO O O ,-- ^O y v w P 8 CC V cd Ry^ O ",� U a 00 cpi . 2 E I q u 7 O b 00 N' v O tU. O ccz vUO � O cyi �. U N Q 'b . 2 +141 .b O E U P80 • 0 • • • 0 P81 o M O d ° ° o [ o 00 O O V O y X 3 �d)a M 03 "O > c N t o U r� O ¢ M cd ,C O v r O O� � O v v y b ) C > o a� o U 0 M >~ T Si is Q^ % O 42 ' 0 p O 4� bA O O 'O a, U N q U U 4c�d C13 cn a rbn 3 U Q s — O O +' v7 N OA N cd 0. °j U o'd . as Ov E p z ca 40, c>d N �0 3s~ 0 3a�,, �9 3 °° � ' o -d 'o ,�, -o =d > Q Q '+• CJ ° a¢i b cd O .fl OA M ,O ► p 0 b ° N W cd U > O C .� 3 cl o �,� �,v� „ J•d ••VV 3 o w 3 3 o 'on 0 C7 an o v o 3 o72 o L) to c� to co 10 C14 -0 v 0 `o ' U. 0 cOd Q 9 N En OCV A W a ° ami G4 vin ° En I M '�O N o 00 00 00 00 00bo ~ O O '" O O C V 0. O .,^ O U -� O O V U N N r. O O> 0 �. Q Q R, Q V] 40 Q al < �D Q . • 0 • • • 0 P81 O 5 >> r C) y O O O m M nt c�O, y40, cn .b O 3 t > Cd O o �: N a� a Q 'r ¢ 7s p 't 00 p �, N' S E O O t. 0. 0O ,� cz En 0 Cd 0n cn > O U N r+ ' Oto p Cd n f� y ° t5-EP 0 W cz Q =_ U �" I c� a C4 C14 cis bo. v. k 0 N 0 O ► . N p V\ 4r i. >, cl42 O co co p a i .fl o p a oo :° :2 o b > �. cd ° a� ' N v_ a� o ? cid o b vo� 72 o y o y 4- O O N bD >' 0 to U) za H .00 cd 00 > cw to3 Ln : M E cn 3 0 z U° m a > uo > .d o .. o U a� Q' U3 0 o +, O a� � . "o N O O + U O o. O N y ON y C •� y O F co cu O 3 icn CA' e •O i cis C4 N O0 O a O O ON O:5 O .� E o v) r, -A) Q .� 'QL=n Q O GQ o ¢ ¢ a U P82 O bUA U C6'bEn u u Cd C O O O i~ i (L) -d U M > AA an "o ° 03A Q o a a. b o C4`� o Cd 0 to Cd �r "00 v co cd 14, bo Cq cd O O N U U 93 a� >toc Cd -Cl 0 U o U Q b Q o N C7 b w' cn o >; 71� OD �, �, r X 3 0 o ° aoi to i U P, C O = EnCd En En '- s ' o ° to ao 4.., Z i ..., on o ami ° > b °� o U 00 to U to to •+ xA a�o� Cd Q > Am o o 0 Cd b o y U O 0 aA4-4 O �A o a OT U o o to u V o .n � o o ti o o ao.� cn Cd U O° U o �+ U U O O U U s. �. m o CAU .max >,N U DC7 N-� aNw o o o . � � W � W cd � W • � � o w 'o cd f� p, � � .� `" o � �. I I k" -o I cdw v I I O� b 03, rr) ca L4 w 00 -o U o A P4 ¢ dr. dcn °W dArs, ¢-v a.. dol m v P83 'o to $1 I b a� N y A ^dC ° U O 4" Cd U O �n "ap +- CU > N x pZ M N .b 4- O s. ,U N O Q U O o a bp Q. U `ate X p 4° > 0. aoi ° c � to 0 �ltoos 3. m-0 U 40. U p a 0 a .r w o >� 3 man 0.a� := �. _ o 0 tn 00 to O ° Cd �on0 :3� �cu '° o ��° °Cd oo °�°� U 4 , to + s` N .r 'o C3. Q. N 44-r *� cid 4° ami cri 3 oto b o oCdrn U 40 En 4) E `o `"00 . o Q. ccd N w+ on C sU. in V O U cd Q" N x U 0 p, m p is Cd 44 +, U O O ,� U U 3 C;3.° o bQ o tea" aCi c� ¢ CUA o V2 4 `. bq - a) A _ a+ A an - c i "CS Cud U bA U �' ^d £ coUce vi r �� O O Q V p �n > iz o Gtr a`�i -o q>^ ° Q" a. a G N c o 3 Q .� �. a� w° .� > C> b o u o .o ° o p -p o a a in 'tz .: >, j CA u�, > °' >, w `v .� Q a? v3 ° c� o. �.N ,� A, N 0. o. M v 'n a Q Gq OAW -0 O cd ed .-- -� O .b +, O a� N O O p O bO O O O� O j O �n bOA C13 0o —Q C40 d�O d Q dv Qv' QA v U P84 .d yS tU11-1 C CIS • �Q) A W ct U cG O U CO C'COCA U A oA N N4� tib cn x N p oho W,u cc�0.., C.) �. U A -o c° N c � � a) O,� c�d�i •gin cn O � U � U U N Vj d •� 'L7 � � O ¢> >Ong O~ C U O 0 N N N it ° v' O r. c >O ti O cd cd W� a °as 0�,0 f. cd ° a, a) O 3 v �n o c° -0A Q �, o y a) 0 U a) O 0 a^❑G to c. 7 U a U :� U= to c ° .-� o'> >, (� Cd U 03 " U ' t�y� O O C Cd • U > b �,� .. E cd 440-4r�/i N N .. -0O co O O w on 0 CW V w. o tl co —10 i. c En I 4:4 on E C7 40 ami w° N '' .- p, Cd 4� �, a� cn V, .�9 ;d b � a 3 o o °, U y Cd 3 A N o N N° ° O O vii' ' a ti oA b rn o cd 0 a 4] ' C7 3 '� 4� co v,U .3u Q3 3;3 A3 •2 "COO cd A � 0 �.W o 0 43 o o p. C� 3 a o to >, co � ° d ° . .� .� ., U ° U a. U Q °' ' U° U 451 o U N O N vi O� 0, O 3 O O O O N M C) C-4 C,4•p �.� > �3( o pqo w O O q O U O O O. p d. da dU° don 40 N dC7°.- d°� dU O W u P85 C 4.w o > el m i 'fl o aui OPCU >: C O s, U o Q R o 'o >; .c. > > =0 `° to � L CL G y � p ."' U • ^' � � U Oeke u 3O p u R N U > u C a� U r. • -r a� u v 0 C 'b Q' >~ u i O ai o Op p LR O L > C +U' W 3 y u L'' .m � 'a 3 Q. C cz 4 a C at .7 O C/I rn C C � �L' y Np❑ � � U .� .0 C C L PC L L> O O nn .b o o41 W O C a� G, b a p 0 U tx 'L o Cd ... 4w, a� c ZA a.)ej PC _ U .m u a oEn 3 N 3 CN N O 3 v N .s: w PW V V v Q9:64 0 L R 4 co cz > V W WCtd) H W •cu � bA I I. N ' I O 6a V C C ri , N C Cl) 'b U O L. O y C a> O U A u Q CIO, Q -v Q U R P86 Attachment 3 P87 2 S o F ts gy8'� o€S � 0 A rH 0 — •C Y o e a T9 9 A O r°n m O U m a U U V 1 I U L 1 1 O 1 U O a O111 O O O O O O Q in O O O h O N N O O O O O O 00 O r`n r O O O O O O O O 00 O O O P tV r fV O C O O O O O O O O h b U _R w. H ..... N N C O Q L } � G 0 0 o 0 w 0 0 0 w w ^ g UO H N O H O O O N P P T < — � w N w H w O O O O OO G — Q m a. } C H H H w H O O O O N N O O O O O P V V Vy V 2 u ,ntg v = = z z N o o ti U �e y cc Q o o U U V Z U <¢ Z z o A a o a o c c E E z � >> < v L L y< 9 'L 9 h 9 N d C u u �' v 9 9 E 9 L.0o C E N O L V N C p in p 9 p 'p til cU in in rn in E>c > E min win Attachment 3 P87