HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/15/1992MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1992
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1840 25TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Carolyn
K. Eggert,
Chairman ( Dist. 2)
James E. Chandler,
County
Administrator
Fran B.
Adams
( Dist.
1)
D. Regular
Meeting -
November 19, 1992
Richard
N. Bird
(Dist.
5)
Charles P. Vitunac,
County
Attorney
Kenneth
R. Macht
(Dist.
3)
John W.
Tippin
( Dist.
4)
Jeffrey K. Barton,
Clerk to
the Board
9: 00 A. M. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION - Rabbi J. R. Davis
Temple Beth Shalom of Vero Beach
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - James E. Chandler
PAGE
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/ EMERGENCY ITEMS
Item 7.L. Surety Bond for Broadus Sowell, Trustee, Indian River
Memorial Hospital District Board;
Item 11.G.3. Emergency Repairs to the Kings Highway Bridge;
Item 13.A. Request from Peter Robinson for letter of
congratulations.
S. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular
Meeting
- October 27, 1992
B. Regular
Meeting
- November 3, 1992
C. Regular
Meeting -
November 10, 1992
D. Regular
Meeting -
November 19, 1992
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Occupational Licenses Collected During Month
of November, 1992
( memorandum dated December 7, 1992 )
B. Supervisor of Elections - Amendment of Budget
to Accept Reimbursements for Election Expenses
( memorandum dated December 8, 1992 )
C. Release of Easement Request By: Raul and
Yolanda Gamez, Lots 4 & 6, Blk. 1, Tropical
Village Estates Subdivision
( memorandum dated November 30, 1992 )
DEC 15 1992 BOOK SS
DEC t51992 BOOK 88 PAGE 263
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd. ): PAGE
D. Resolution Accepting Utility Easements in
Westlake Subdivision
( memorandum dated December 7, 1992 )
E. Request for Public Hearing Date - AN
ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MAKING AN EDITORIAL REMOVAL OF CHAPTER
4 1/2 CABLE TELEVISION (1974 CODE) AND
NOTING THAT IN CHAPTER 211 CABLE TELE-
VISION (1990 CODE)
( memorandum dated Dec. 2, 1992 )
F. I.R.C. County Judicial Complex Project -
Site Utility Improvements
( memorandum dated December 4, 1992 )
G. County Owned Building - 4716 33rd Ave. -
Request to Demolish
( memorandum dated December 8, 1992 )
H. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance
Waiver for Lot 8, Blk. 20, Vero Lake Estates
Unit 4
( memorandum dated December 7, 1992 )
I. Addendum to Humane Society
( memorandum dated December 4, 1992 )
J. Release of Utility Liens
( memorandum dated December 9, 1992 )
K. Additional Right -of -Way; CR 512, Sebastian,
Sebastian Paradise Limited Parcel
( memorandum dated November 24, 1992 )
S. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
Explanation of Environmental Health By
Michael Galanis
(no backup provided)
9:05 a.m. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
1. Request from Countryside to Discuss
Sewer Hook-up in Countryside North
( letter dated November 19, 1992 )
(re -scheduled from meeting of 12/1/92)
2. Request to Extend After School Program
( letter dated November 4, 1992 )
( backup in separate packet, left-hand sleeve of notebook)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
r
� DEC x.51992
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Environmental Land Acquisition: Immediate Cost
Share Funding Opportunities
( memorandum dated December 8, 1992 )
B. EMERGENCY SERVICES
None
C. GENERAL SERVICES
None
D. LEISURE SERVICES
None
E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
None
F. PERSONNEL
None
G. PUBLIC WORKS
1. Final Payment -.37th Street ( Barber Ave.)
Design of Widening & Drainage Improvement
( memorandum dated December 2, 1992 )
2. Request for County to Grade Unpaved Roads
with the Following Rights -of -Way
1) 101st Crt. between_ 90th St. E 92nd
St. in Vero Lakes Estates S/D
2) 79th St. between 102nd Crt. & 102nd
Ave. in Vero Lakes Estates S/D
3) 82nd St. east of U.S.1
( memorandum dated December 9, 1992 )
H. UTILITIES
1. Water Expansion Plan Phase I - Contract 1;
Change Order 1 and Final Pay Request
( memorandum dated December 2, 1992 )
2. Water Expansion Plan Phase I - Contract 4;
Change Order 1 and Final Pay Request
( memorandum dated December 2, 1992 )
3. Water Expansion Plan Phase I - Contract 5;
Change Order 1 and Final Pay Request
( memorandum dated December 2, 1992 )
4. Sludge/Septage Facility Retainage
( memorandum dated December 2, 1992 )
S. Water Service in Kings Highway S/D and Replat
of Blocks 1, 2, 3, and 4, 39th and 40th Streets
East of Kings Highway and 56th Ave.; Resolution
IV and Final Assessment Roll
( memorandum dated December 3, 1992 )
6. Final Assessment Roll - Resolution IV - The
Meadows S/D - 41st Crt. Water Service Project
( memorandum dated November 19, 1992 )
PAGE
5.00K PnF 264
I
BOOK 88 P, Gu 265
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (cont'd.):
H. UTILITIES (cont'd. ):
7. Final Pay Request - King's Highway S/D
( memorandum dated December 1, 1992 )
8. Water Line Replacement Projects - Ixora Park,
Glen Acres and Cooks' S/D - Change Order 1
( memorandum dated December 3, 1992 )
9. Developer's Agreement with the Most
Reverend J. Keith Symons, Bishop of
the Dioceses of Palm Beach
( memorandum dated November 9, 1992 )
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
14.
A. CHAIRMAN CAROLYN K. EGGERT
B. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS
C. COMMISSIONER RICHARD N. BIRD
D. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MRCHT
E. COMMISSIONER JOHN W. TIPPIN
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
1. Approval
of Minutes
- Meeting
10/27/92
2. Approval
of Minutes
- Meeting
11/03/92
3. Approval of Modification to Emergency
Medical Services ( EMS) County Awards Grant
( memorandum dated December 4, 1992 )
4. Approval of Modification to EMS Matching
Funds Grant S Sole Source Purchase of
Lancet Tech., Inc. Software Program
( memorandum dated December 8, 1992 )
PAGE
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS (contd): PAGE
B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
® Bid Award - Front End Loader
( memorandum dated December 2, 1992 )
15. ADJOURNMENT
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE
AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MAY
CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X 408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF
MEETING.
DEC 151992
a00K 88 pour. ��Z)
Tuesday, December 15, 1992
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers,
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida on Tuesday, December 15,
1992, at 9:00 o'clock A. M. Present were Carolyn K. Eggert,
Chairman; Richard N. Bird, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams: Kenneth R.
Macht; and John W. Tippin. Also present were James E. Chandler,
County Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and
Patricia Held, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
Rabbi J. R. Davis, Temple Beth Shalom of Vero Beach, led the
invocation.
County Administrator Jim Chandler led the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Chairman Eggert requested the addition of Consent Agenda Item
L, surety bond for Broadus Sowell to the Indian River Memorial
Hospital District Board; Item 11.G.3., Emergency Repairs to the
Kings Highway Bridge; and 13.A., the request for a letter from
Peter Robinson.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously added the
above items to the Agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections
to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 27, 1992. There
were none.
qn""l
DEC BOOK PAGE
DEC 15 M7 . BOOK 88 PAGE 268
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board approved the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting of October 27, 1992 as
written.
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections
to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 3, 1992. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board approved the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting of November 3, 1992 as
written.
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections
to the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 10, 1992. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board approved the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting of November 10, 1992 as
written.
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections
to the Minutes of the Special Meeting of November 19, 1992. There
were none.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board approved the Minutes
of the Special Meeting of November 19, 1992 as
written.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Occupational Licenses Collected During Month of November, 1992
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously accepted
the following report from Tax Collector Gene Morris
summarizing Occupational License Taxes collected
during the month of November, 1992.
2
NMRAHDDIK
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Gene E. Morris, Tax Collector
SUBJECT: Occupational Licenses
DATE: December 7, 1992
Pursuant to Indian River County Ordinance No. 86-59, please be
informed that $7,725.46 was collected in occupational license
taxes during the month of November, representing the issuance
of 305 licenses.
B. Supervisor of Elections - Amendment of Budget to Accept
Reimbursements for Election Expenses
The Board reviewed memo from Supervisor of Elections Ann
Robinson dated December 8, 1992:
cep
December 8, 1992
TO: HON. CAROLYN K. EGGERT, CHAIRMAN, BCC
FROM: ANN ROBINSON, SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS rN,v
RE: ITEM FOR BCC CONSENT AGENDA OF DECEMBER 15, 1992
Please amend the Supervisor of Elections budget so that
we may accept the reimbursements for election expenses
from the following:
Sebastian Inlet Tax District $2234
Indian River County Hospital District $1000
Indian River Mosquito Control District $1000.
Thank you.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously amended
the Supervisor of Election's budget, as recommended
by staff.
3
POOK 88 P,�F, 2�, -dA
L_DEC 151992
BOOK F1�
DEC 15 1992
C. Release of Easement Request By Raul and Yolanda Gamez Lots 4
and 6. Block 1. Tropical Village Estates Subdivision
The Board reviewed memo from Code Enforcement Officer Charles
Heath dated November 30, 1992:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE:
Obert M. eat ng, 4 MCP
Community Dever oto- meWt Director
THROUGH: Roland DeBlois-,'AICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
& Code Enforcement
FROM: Charles W. Heathcav-w.
Code Enforcement Officer
DATE: November 30, 1992
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF EASEMENT REQUEST BY:
Raul & Yolanda Gamez
Lots 4 & 6, Block 11 Tropical Village Estates Subdivision
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of December 1'5�=, 1992.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The County.has been petitioned by Paul & Yolanda Gamez, owners of
the subject property, for the release of the common three (3) foot
side lot utility and drainage easements of Lots 4 & 6, Block 1,
Tropical Village Estate Subdivision. It is the petitioners'
intention to construct a single-family residence on the combined
lots.
The current zoning classification of
Single -Family Residential District.
2, allowing up to six (6) units per
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS:
the subject property is RS -61
The Land Use Designation is L -
acre.
The request has been reviewed by Southern Bell Telephone Company,
Florida Power & Light Company, Falcon Cable Corporation, and the
Indian River Utilities Department, and the Road & Bridge and
Engineering Divisions. Based upon their reviews, there would be no
adverse impact in supplying utilities to the subject property.
4
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Board, through the adoption of a
resolution, release the common three (3) foot side lot utility and
drainage easements of Lots 4 & 6, Block 1, being the southerly
three (3) feet of Lot 4, and the northerly three (3) feet of Lot 6,
Tropical Village Estates Subdivision, Section 24, Township 31
South, Range 37 East, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 94 1/2 of
the Public Records of Indian River County, Florida.
and
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-225, abandoning certain easements in
Tropical Village Estates Subdivision, as recommended
by staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-225
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ABANDONING CERTAIN EASEMENTS IN TROPICAL VILLAGE
ESTATES SUBDIVISION, LOTS 4 & 6, BLOCK 1, ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4,
PAGE 94 1/2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, Indian River County has easements as described below,
WHEREAS, the retention of those easements serves no public
purposes,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida that:
This release of easement is executed by Indian River County,
a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing
address is 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, Grantor, to
Raul & Yolanda Gamez.Grantees, their successor in interest, heirs
and assigns, whose mailing address is P.O. Box 542, Fellsmere,
Florida 32948,. as follows:
Indian River County does hereby abandon all right, title, and
interest that it may have in the following described easements:
5
DEC 15 1992 BOOK F,F1
r DEC 15 1992
In
I2
�y�
BOOK 8 FA;r 9
the three (3) foot common side lot utility and drainage
easements of Lots 4 & 6, Block 1, being the southerly three
(3) feet of Lot 4, and the northerly three (3) feet of Lot 6,
Tropical Village Estates -Subdivision, Section 24, Township 31
South, Range 37 East, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 94 1/2
of the Public.Records of Indian River County, Florida.
THIS RESOLUTION was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Bird , seconded by Commissioner
Adams , and adopted by the following vote:
Commissioner
Carolyn K. Eggert
Aye
Commissioner
Richard N. Bird
Aye
Commissioner
Fran B. Adams
Aye
Commissioner
Kenneth R. Macht
Aye
Commissioner
John Tippin
Aye
The Chairman declared the resolution duly passed and adopted
this 15 day of December , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY, COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA
By. L CJ / /G
Carol K. Egger,
Chairman
D. Resolution Accepting Utility Easements in Westlake Subdivision
The Board reviewed memo from County Attorney Charles Vitunac
dated December 7, 1992:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: December 7, 1992
RE: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING UTILITY
EASEMENTS IN WESTLAXE SUBDIVISION
In connection with the Department.. of Utility Services installing water
lines for the Phase II water -main extension growth plan, it is necessary
that the County formally accept the utility easements shown on the plat
Of Westlake Subdivision.
REQUESTED ACTION: Request the Board's approval and authorization for
the Chairman to sign the attached resolution accepting the necessary
utility easements.
6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-226 formally accepting utility
easements in Westland Park Subdivision, as
recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 226
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, FORMALLY ACCEPTING UTILITY
EASEMENTS IN WESTLAKE PARK SUBDI-
VISION.
WHEREAS, Indian River County is in the process of installing water
lines in connection with Phase II of the water main extension growth plan;
and
WHEREAS, in connection with this project, it is necessary for the
County to install its water lines in certain utility easements in Westlake Park
subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 25, Public Records of St.
Lucie County, Florida, now recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 83, Public
Records of Indian River County, Florida;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN
RIVER
COUNTY,
FLORIDA,
that the Board
hereby formally
accepts the
utility
easements,
as offered
to the County,
shown on the plat of the above -referenced subdivision.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Bird ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being
w
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 14- day of At&"Prk_ , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By l� 2Z4�
7
Chairman
800K 8's
DEC 151992 F� �
r DEC 15 im
BOOK 8 �AcE274 -7
E. Request for Public Hearing Date - AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER
COUNTY, FLORIDA MAKING AN EDITORIAL REMOVAL OF CHAPTER 4-1/2 CABLE
TELEVISION (1974 CODE) AND NOTING THAT IN CHAPTER 211 CABLE
TELEVISION (1990 CODE)
The Board reviewed memo from Assistant County Attorney Terry
O'Brien dated December 2, 1992:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney
DATE: December 2, 1992
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ORDINANCE ENTITLED:
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
MAKING AN EDITORIAL REMOVAL OF CHAPTER 4 1/2
CABLE TELEVISION (1974 CODE) AND NOTING THAT IN
CHAPTER 211 CABLE TELEVISION (1990 CODE) .
A public hearing date of January 12, 1993 is suggested for the subject
ordinance.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously scheduled
a public hearing on January 12, 1993 to consider an
ordinance making editorial removal of Chapter 4-1/2
Cable Television (1974 Code) and noting that in
Chapter 211 Cable Television (1990 Code).
F. I.R.C. County Judicial Complex Project - Site Utility
Improvements
The Board reviewed memo from General Services Director Sonny
Dean dated December 4, 1992:
8
i i �
r � �
DATE: DECEMBER 41 1992
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVyAs
SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JUDICIAL COMPLEX PROJECT
SITE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
BACKGROUND:
On May 26, 1992, the Board approved $83,066.00 to be paid to the City
of Vero Beach for site utility improvements on the new courthouse
complex. This was the amount the City included in their request to
proceed with the project.
ANALYSIS:
Due to complications with satisfying requirements for building
foundation improvements, fire code demands, and bids coming in higher
than expected, actual cost totaled $91,685.00. This is an increase
of $8,619.00 over the authorized expenditure.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends the Board authorize the payment of $91,685.00 to the
City of Vero Beach for utility site improvements.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized
payment of $491,685.00 to the City of Vero Beach for
utility site improvements, as recommended by staff.
G. County Owned Building - 4716 33rd Avenue - Request to Demolish
The Board reviewed memo from General Services Director Sonny
Dean dated December 8, 1992:
7
DEC 15 1992 800K 88 PV'F.975
DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1992
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECT
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERAs
SUBJECT: COUNTY OWNED BUILDING - 4716 33RD AVENUE
REQUEST TO DEMOLISH
BACKGROUND:
BOOK 88 F -A, 276
Indian River County owns Lot 9, Block 9, Smith Plaza Subdivision at
4716 33rd Avenue. This is the location of the old Gifford Jaycee
Building. It has not be maintained in several years and the
structure is not safe for inhabitation.
ANALYSIS:
On request of this writer, the County Building Department made an
inspection of the building and identified the structure to be
dangerous and unsafe.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the above, staff feels the structure represents a liability
to the County and recommends action to demolish and dispose of the
building.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized
demolition and disposal of the building at 4716 33rd
Avenue, as recommended by staff.
H. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for Lot 8
Block 20. Vero Lake Estates Unit 4
The Board reviewed memo from Civil Engineer David B. Cox dated
December 7, 1992:
10
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
and oeRoger D. Cain, P.E.
County Engineer
FROM: David B. Cox, P.E.4%C
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver -for Lot 8, Block 20, Vero Lake
Estates, Unit 4
REFERENCE: Project No. 92110029
DATE: December 7, 1992 CONSENT AGENDA
Sunlight Homes, Inc. has submitted a building permit application for a single family residence on
the subject property. The site is located in an AE flood hazard zone, base flood elevation 22.8 ft.
at the northwest ' corner of 79th Street and 91st Avenue. In the attached letter dated December 3,
1992, the engineer has requested the cut and fill balance waiver provided in Section 930.07(2)(d)4.
of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance be granted by the Board of County
Commissioners. The lot area is 1.08 acres. The amount of 100 year floodplain displacement created
by the proposed grading plan is estimated as 645 cubic yards by the applicant's engineer. The
attached letter signed and sealed on December 3, 1992 certifies that all applicable requirements of
the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance will be met.
The waiver request has been reviewed by staff and appears to meet the criteria of Section
930.07(2)(d)4. of the Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Ordinance for lots located in
the Vero Lake Estates Municipal Services Taxing Unit.
Alternative No. 1 - Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section
930.07(2)(d)4.
Alternative No. 2 - Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to
compensate for.the proposed floodplain displacement.
• �llul�l►I� � •
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously granted
the cut and fill balance waiver for Lot 8, Block 20,
Vero Lake Estates, Unit 4, as recommended by staff.
001
DEC 15 1992
BOOK 88 F,�r X77
DEC j 5 19,1 BOOK 88 F,1GE 2 i
I. Addendum to Humane Society
The Board reviewed memo from Assistant County Attorney Terry
O'Brien dated December 4, 1992:
TO: Board of County Commissioners G� a
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien - Assistant County Attorney V-?
DATE: December 4, 1992
SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO HUMANE SOCIETY
An addendum to the Humane Society's Agreement with the County was
executed on October 16, 1990 by the County and the Society. The
purpose of this addendum was to provide, on a leased basis, additional
County land for parking space at the Society's facility.
The legal description when surveyed and compared against the proposed
plan for parking was inconsistent. The correct legal description has
now been obtained.
A new addendum superseding the legal description of the October 16,
1990 addendum has been prepared for Commission consideration and
execution is recommended.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
and authorized the Chairman to execute the Addendum
to the Agreement with the Humane Society to correct
the legal description, as recommended by staff.
ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
J. Release of Utility Liens
The Board reviewed memo from Lea R. Keller, CLA, dated
December 9, 1992:
12
s � �
ti
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CLA, County Attorney's Office
DATE: December 9, 1992
RE: CONSENT AGENDA - BCC MEETING 12/15/92
RELEASE OF UTILITY LIENS
The following lien -related documents are prepared in proper form for
the Board to authorize the Chairman to sign them:
1. Partial Release of Special Assessment
Liens from Rockridge Sewer Project:
STRUNK
MCCABE/GAROFALO (2)
2. Satisfaction of Impact Fee Extensions:
BURNHAM
BIBLE WAY CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST
WADSWORTH
SHEARER COMMERCIAL CENTER
GARBER
McGEARY
LOVRETIN
RIVER RUN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
WILLMOT
HUDSON/SMITH
PINTO
KMETZ
RILEY
ALLEN/GIFFORD MANOR GARDENS
GIBSON (2)
HARVEY
HILL
HOWELL
BRAVE
BAKER
MAYER
COLLEY (3)
LINDHORST
SCHOONOVER
JORDAN
GRAYBROOK INVESTMENTS/LEWIS
PROPERTY INVESTORS
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the partial releases and satisfactions of impact fee
extensions as listed in staff's memorandum.
SAID SATISFACTIONS AND RELEASE DOCUMENTS
ARE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
13
DEC 19 In Bou 88 F'A,F 97
r
DEC J-5 1992
BOOK 88 F,1GE ` 's
K. Additional Right -of -Way - CR 512 in Sebastian - Sebastian
Paradise Limited Parcel
The Board reviewed memo from County Right -of -Way Agent Don
Finney dated November 24, 1992:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E.,
FROM: Donald G. Finney, SR
County Right of Way
• :Q
SUBJECT: Additional Right -of -Way; CR 512, Sebastian, Sebastian Paradise Limited Parcel
DATE: November 24, 1992
Additional right-of-way is needed at the north side of existing County Road 512 for the future
improvements for the Twin pairs project in Sebastian, Florida.
Sebastian Paradise Limited is a commercially zoned 5.57 acre property. Mr. J.T. Ballinger, General
Partner of FRM Real Estate and Investment Co., Pompano Beach, Florida represents all of the four
partners.
Two appraisals were obtained by the county ata value of $41,387 and $38,700. Mr. Ballinger
counter -offered in writing $121,532. In an effort to save attorney fees, and additional time, the
county increased the offer to a fam $50,000. The owner responded with a written $85,000 counter-
offer. After obtaining the second appraisal, the owner agreed to and executed the $50,000 contract.
In lieu of additional time, attorneys' fees and court costs, staff requests the Board accept the $50,000
contract and direct the Chairman to execute the contract on the Board's behalf.
Funding is available in Traffic Impact Fee District 3, Account No. 101-153-541-066.12
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the Contract for Sale and Purchase with Sebastian
Paradise Limited in the amount of $50,000, as
recommended by staff.
CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
14
L. Approval of Surety Bond for Broadus Sowell, Trustee, Indian
River Memorial Hospital District Board
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously accepted
the surety bond for Broadus Sowell, Trustee, Indian
River Memorial District Board.
COPY OF SURETY BOND
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
EXPLANATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH BY MICHAEL GALANIS
Mike Galanis, Director of Environmental Health for 10 years,
gave an overview of the Environmental Health Department.
Environmental Health is part of the Health Department, which is
directed by Dr. Bernard Berman. We are in HRS District 9, which is
governed out of West Palm Beach. There will be changes early next
year and we will be in District 15 out of St. Lucie County. This
will provide more local input in the HRS structure and therefore
more local input into the Health Department. Environmental Health
is supported by both state and local funds and was organized under
Chapter 154 of the Florida Statutes which basically sets down all
local health departments as joint agencies of state and local
government. Environmental Health receives over half a million
dollars yearly from the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners. Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
built the new health facility, and everything purchased by the
Health Department, regardless of the source of funds, is owned by
the Board of County Commissioners.
For the past 10 years, Director Galanis served on site plan
committees for the County, City of Vero Beach, and City of
Sebastian and provided input related to water and sewer to all
developers before they submitted their plans. Environmental Health
helped develop the County's master plan for water and wastewater.
Environmental Health employs 9 full-time professional staff and 3
clerical staff. In the middle 80s that department had 12 full-time
professional staff and three clerical staff until the Department of
Business Regulations assumed responsibility for food inspection.
The Environmental Health Department consults with developers
regarding county and state regulations and agencies, and advises
when they must be contacted.
Environmental Health also seeks out contracts with other state
agencies. For example, a water quality monitoring project was just
completed and currently the Environmental Health Department has a
15
DEC 15 1992 BOOK 88 F�KuF 9dSl
DEC, 15 19
BOOK 88 PAGE 282 -7
project to monitor the waters of the Indian River monthly to
measure the light penetrating to the seagrass. This type of
contracting with other agencies has brought in over a half millions
dollars in the past 5 or 6 years. Environmental Health's major
contract right now is the underground storage program which
includes 1,031 registered tank facilities in Indian River -County.
When these tanks are dug up, we find that all of them have been
leaking and Environmental Health enforces the cleanup. Indian
River County's Environmental Health Department is one of only four
county health departments that enforce the state's environmental
rules locally. In 1985, in conjunction with the Board of County
Commissioners, Environmental Health wrote and developed the special
act called the Indian River County Environmental Control Rule. It
authorizes the appointment of Environmental Control Officers and
the establishment of a Board of interested participating citizens
to hear environmental cases locally. The current board members are
Attorney Alan Polackwich, John Orcutt, Ellie Van Os, Steve
Snoberger and Dr. Roger Zwemer. In the last four years
Environmental Health assessed and collected over $170,000 in
environmental fines here in Indian River County. Currently we have
$20,000 in the Pollution Trust Fund. We are currently designated
a "Local Program," and are pursuing an agreement to allow us to
enforce local DER rules related to mangrove trimming. We hope in
the future to be delegated to wastewater and public drinking water
programs. There is a potential for a permitting program for
doctors, veterinarian and nursing home waste disposal, and on
January 1 there will be a new small public water systems program
for small water systems like those serving shopping centers.
Director Galanis stated that his jurisdiction is Indian River
County and while his department is employed and paid by the State
of Florida, his loyalties remain with Indian River County.
Commissioner Adams asked about indoor pollution, or the "sick
building" problem.
Director Galanis felt his department is one of the best
equipped departments to investigate that problem but it is a
complex problem involving the whole realm of sensitivity in
individuals. He stated that he was invited to help in the
investigation in the Martin County Courthouse case, but he refused
because many experts already were involved, and he predicted they
will abandon that building.
Chairman Eggert asked about the status of rabies control.
Director Galanis stated that the rabies program was
traditionally investigated by the Public Health Department. He
reported that for over 25 years we have not had a case of rabies in
16
a domestic animal, and it has been 30 years since anyone died of
rabies in Florida, so the funding for rabies control was eliminated
in the Governor's budget 2 years ago. There are still incidents
involving foxes, skunks, raccoons and bats and we provide the serum
when needed. We have not quit the rabies program but have quit
investigating incidences of animal bites from domestic animals.
Commissioner Macht asked if Environmental Health reviewed the
air conditioning plans for the Indian River County Courthouse.
County Administrator Jim Chandler assured the Board that we
will not have the problem in our courthouse that Martin County
experienced.
Chairman Eggert asked for an explanation of what the
Environmental Health Department reviews regarding site plans.
Director Galanis explained that Environmental Health is
involved in aspects such as storage tanks for gasoline and other
chemicals, public water and private water systems, drainage, and
performs a broad overall environmental review of every site plan.
They work closely with Community Development.
Director Galanis commented that he appears before the Board
whenever Dr. Berman is not available.
County Attorney Charles Vitunac asked Director Galanis to give
the details of the Heritage Village case.
Director Galanis explained that Heritage Village had an
undersized wastewater treatment plant with a percolation pond. The
pond was very large but was in need of maintenance and did not
function properly. They had overflow 24 hours a day into a ditch
surrounding the park, with periodic incidences of failure of the
dike around the polishing pond, which resulted in effluent in the
streets and roads of the park. It was a bad situation, and in
cooperation with the Environmental Control Board, the Environmental
Health Department caused that mobile home park to be connected to
the public sewage system.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
REQUEST FROM COUNTRYSIDE TO DISCUSS SEWER HOOK -IIP IN COUNTRYSIDE
,NORTH
The Board reviewed a letter from Robert Peters, Vice President
of Countryside of Vero Beach, dated November 19, 1992:
17
�C A1 5 1992 BOOK FA;� 3
rBOOK 88 PvsE 284
November 19, 1992
Board of County Ccamaissioners
Indian River County
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach; FL 32960
Rye: Request to be Placed on Agenda for the Domer 1, 1992 meeting
I would like to be placed an the Agenda for the December 1, 1992 County
Commissioners meeting for the purpose of discussing sewer hook-up in
Countryside ntryside North. Thank you.
Vest truly yours,
Robert A. Peters
Vice President
Attorney Sam Block, representing Realcor of Vero Beach
Associates, owner of Countryside Mobile Home Community, addressed
the Board regarding a franchise which was entered into in 1980 and
modified twice since then. In a modification to the franchise
agreement, the water hook-up to the County system was extended to
the year 2002 and Attorney Block requested the same extension for
the wastewater portion. He stated that the mobile home owners
cannot afford the wastewater hook-up and they would rather put
their money into other items that will benefit them in their park.
Attorney Block reminded the Board that as a condition of the
franchise agreement, every time a mobile home is sold or turned
over, the County receives the impact fee for that unit. Since 1985
the County has received 200 fees and can expect to receive 40 to 50
each year. Attorney Block stated that the wastewater treatment
plant was built in 1981 and is at less than 50 percent capacity now
because it was built for two parks and one of the parks went on the
County system. There have been no violations and the system is up
to quality standards. He urged the Board to allow the park to
proceed with the present system and if there are problems, they can
be addressed.
Attorney Block pointed out that Mr. Ed Nelson and other
residents of Countryside were in the audience and were in agreement
with this request.
Attorney Block reported that the legislature is working on a
method of phasing in mobile home parks over 8 to 10 years and that
18
is what he was requesting. He urged the Board to avoid litigation
and the high costs associated with lawsuits. He estimated that
over the 10 years, the impact fees will be in the County's hands
and at that time the system could be hooked up.
Chairman Eggert clarified that a condition of the original
development agreement was to hook up to the County wastewater
system when it became available.
Attorney Block agreed that in the franchise it does indicate
that the hook-up is mandated.
County Administrator Jim Chandler further advised that a
condition of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council was that
the package plants were to be considered temporary until such time
as County facilities became available, so the requirement to hook
up extended beyond just our franchise agreement. It was part of
the original permitting and approval of the development itself.
That was one of the conditions of the Department of Environmental
Regulations in 1980.
Commissioner Bird thought it sounded simple and asked for the
other side of the story.
Utility Services Director Terry Pinto agreed it is simple when
we are looking at one specific wastewater treatment plant in the
county, but the master plan of the county recognizes that package
plants are not good for the county. When you look at them on an
overall basis, collectively, they are bad, even when a plant is
operating properly. The county invested $90 million dollars for a
utilities system based on franchise agreements. These agreements
are what allowed these facilities to be built in the first place.
When the developer went to the Regional Planning Council and came
to this County Board, they were allowed to build because they
entered into that agreement. They understood that utilities are a
major issue for this county and we cannot allow package plants to
be scattered through the county.
Director Pinto explained that the phasing that Mr. Block
mentioned has been proposed as a method of paying impact fees.
Indian River County has gone beyond anyone in the state in offering
many different ways of paying impact fees. One of the options is
not to pay the impact fee until the unit that you are living in is
sold. The logic behind that is that there is a money transaction
taking place and it should make that process a little less
difficult. The County Commission offered a finance plan over a 10 -
year period. That is phasing. The request for an extension to the
year 2002 is not phasing. Director Pinto felt it would be
detrimental to our system to have a package wastewater treatment
plant like that at Countryside because when there is a failure
19
9r,15
r- DEC, 15 1992
BOOK 88 PAGE,2,S6
there is a health problem and we must react. We planned the County
utilities system from the beginning knowing that these plants were
to be temporary. Everyone agreed. If we allow this plant to
continue, it just throws all of that planning out the window.
Director Pinto felt that if this proposal were made in the very
beginning, that park would not have been built.
Chairman Eggert noted that the word "mandate" was mentioned.
She also wondered if the water could be extended to 2002, why not
the wastewater.
Director Pinto agreed that the word "mandate" has been
bouncing around. He pointed out that a requirement for the
original permit for the development was the agreement to hook up to
the County wastewater system, and whether that is a "mandate" will
be interpreted by the courts.
Commissioner Macht asked, and County Attorney Charles Vitunac
advised that the Board does have the latitude to grant the request.
If the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council wants to take some
action on the Development of Regional Impact (DRI), it may. He
further advised that this request has to do with the fact that the
original tenants of this park were given a lifetime lease which
said the park owner would pay the utilities. The park owner hopes
that at the end of 10 years all the original tenants will have sold
or turned over their units and new tenants will be under new
leases. The owner then can pass through to them the costs of
connecting to the County.wastewater system.
Attorney Block agreed.
Commissioner Bird asked about the bond holders, and Attorney
Vitunac advised that our bonds have to be self-supporting. He did
not think our bonds would be challenged unless we fail to make our
payments to the bond holders.
Discussion ensued regarding the operation of this plant and
other wastewater treatment package plants in the County. Director
Pinto estimated 5 or 6 plants are left, and they will all be
connected within the next year.
Chairman Eggert asked, and Director Pinto confirmed that
granting the extension would be contrary to our master plan.
Commissioner Adams needed more information and time to study
the issue.
Commissioner Bird asked, and Director Pinto clarified that the
impact fees for wastewater are being paid as units are sold, and
that process would not change whether they connect or not.
Regarding the water, Director Pinto thought the agreement says that
at time of connection the impact fees will be due. At that time
the Commission would decide on the method of payment.
Fes]
Attorney Block pointed out that in the meantime the park owner
is providing water.
Chairman Eggert recognized Mr. Ed Nelson, representative of
the homeowners at Countryside. She asked if he could give a 3 -
minute summary statement.
Ed Nelson asked for 5 minutes, but agreed to wait for the next
hearing rather than repeat himself. He clarified that he is vice
president and immediate past president of the owners' association
and would speak as their representative. He further stated that
the association fully concurs with the request by the park owner
for the extension.
Chairman Eggert suggested that it would be helpful to have his
presentation in writing for the Commissioners to read ahead of
time.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, to schedule a public discussion
on January 19, 1993 at 9:05 a.m., and to direct
staff to provide an update of the detailed study on
Countryside from 1980.
Under discussion, Commissioner Macht requested a synopsis of
the status and relationship of all the mobile home parks.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
It was voted on and carried unanimously.
The Chairman recessed the meeting briefly at 9:55 a.m. and the
Board reconvened at 10:05 a.m. with all members present.
REQUEST TO EXTEND AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM
Commissioner Bird announced that the Principal of Vero Beach
Elementary School made a request to the Parks and Recreation
Committee to extend the after-school program to include his school.
There are three remaining schools which are not included in the
after-school program at the present time and the Recreation
Director indicated that the Board should consider extending that
program to the three remaining elementary schools if they wanted to
join in Mr. Gipson's request.
Chairman Eggert was supportive of the after-school program but
reminded the Board that when this issue was first discussed,
Children Services recommended that no new schools be brought into
21
D � � 1� � ROOK 88 F:+�:F ? `7
F' DEC 15 100V
fuF 2" 8
the program except at regular budget times, and no school would be
brought into the program that had not made a formal request. She
was uncomfortable about the request under discussion because of the
Children's Services' position. She also pointed out that there is
a misunderstanding in the community regarding this program. Some
people think this is a low-cost program to low-income families,
which is not true. It is available to everyone.
Godfrey Gipson, Principal of Vero Beach Elementary School,
came before the Board and requested an extension of the after-
school program to include his school. He stated that he
represented many parents who work full time and could not afford to
lose a day to come before the Board to make this request
themselves. He reported that a PTA survey indicated that 107
parents would use the after-school program. Of that 107, 22
currently use private day care. At the present time students at
Vero Beach Elementary are being transported to other schools for
the after-school program. This causes difficulty at the County
School Board office assigning children to Vero Beach Elementary
because the parents prefer to have their children assigned to a
school which provides the after-school program. Mr. Gipson
realized that the private day care industry is involved, but he
assured them he is not trying to compete with them. This after-
school program is intended for 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students who
presently are going home alone. These 4th and 5th grade students
do not want to go to day care centers, which is their privilege, so
the after-school program is not taking any clientele from the day
care centers.
Chairman Eggert clarified that the program is open to anyone
who wishes to enroll. She also asked, and Commissioner Bird
responded that a budget has been set up for Vero Beach Elementary
School, but not for Glendale, Rosewood or Beachland, and that Vero
Beach Elementary made the request and the other three were called
and asked if they wanted to join in.
Rosemarie Livings, Director of Admissions and Attendance of
the Indian River School District, reported that every year they
receive about a hundred requests from desperate parents who do not
want their children to be at home alone and cannot afford the cost
of day care. The after-school program was designed for those
children. The Admissions and Attendance office must balance class
sizes and must solve the problem of assigning children to the
schools with the after-school program. Ms. Livings discussed this
problem with Recreation Director Pat Callahan and they came up with
the possibility of bringing all schools into the program to serve
all children. She assured the Board that she is not out to
22
undermine day care but is concerned about children from
kindergarten to 5th grade who are left unattended.
Commissioner Bird asked, and Ms. Livings responded that there
is a potential of 50 to 100 students at each of the four schools,
with a maximum total of 300.
Commissioner Macht thought that the Board is on shaky ground
if we are not offering the after-school program to all schools.
Chairman Eggert explained that it was left to the individual
schools to request the program because the individual school runs
its own program.
County Administrator Jim Chandler noted that not all schools
wanted to be included. He gave the example of Pelican Island
Elementary School, which started an after-school program, found
there were problems, abandoned their program and now they transport
their after-school students to Sebastian Elementary.
Barry Sesack, Principal of Glendale Elementary School,
reviewed a survey that he sent out. He reported that Glendale's
population is 662 students in 500 families; 150 surveys were
returned with 97 responding that they were not interested in the
after-school program; 4 said "maybe" and 57 said "yes, they were
interested;" 17 families indicated they were presently being
serviced by a day care center but would opt for the Glendale
program if it were financed through the County. He pointed out
that there is a major problem of transporting these children to
their homes after the program. He stated that he wanted to work
with the day care industry to provide a safe environment for our
children after school.
Chairman Eggert pointed out that part of our overall Economic
Development Plan is a commitment to support small businesses in the
community. We also have the big responsibility of caring for all
the children in our community.
Mark Dugan stated that this is his first year as Principal of
Rosewood Elementary School. Prior to that he was the principal of
Sebastian Elementary where an after-school program was in place,
and one of his first concerns at Rosewood was an after-school
program. He did not have time to do a survey prior to this
meeting, and he concurred with Mrs. Livings' comments. He was
concerned about the procedures as explained by Chairman Eggert, and
he was concerned about the private day care industry. He stated
that Mr. Macht's point about making this program available at all
schools was also brought up by parents at his school. He noted
that the after-school program requires a certified person to be in
charge who wants to work and wants extra money. Mr. Dugan
described the staff at Rosewood Elementary School as a mature
23
DEC 151992 BOOK �� NiCH
FF,_
oEc 15 1992
BOOK 88 FAGt 290 -7
teaching staff, and he did not know if there is a teacher who wants
to stay the additional time after school to run this program. Mr.
Dugan stated that he discussed with Lenora Quimby the Blueprint
2000 Plan, which is a set of goals for schools, and one of the
goals is the safety of our children. He expected that in the near
future our schools will be open from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and
there might be local funding required for that.
Chairman Eggert asked, and Mr. Dugan responded that of the 435
students at Rosewood, close to 50 percent are on free or reduced
lunches, which would be about 200 to 220 students.
Commissioner Macht asked whether Mr. Dugan would be interested
in a pilot program of contracting with the existing day care
centers for the purpose of after-school care for his students.
Mr. Dugan responded that he would like to look into that
possibility. He further advised that LaPetite Academy furnished
literature on such a program, which he has not reviewed yet. He
reiterated Mr. Sesack's concern about the transportation of
children to their homes after the program because many of the moms
and dads work and have problems picking up their children.
Chairman Eggert asked OMB Director Joe Baird for the most
recent costs for this after-school program.
Director Baird reported that the figures are for a 3 -month
period and so far it looks like we have about $9,000 surplus. He
further explained that the program always starts off with low
revenues because of families getting organized. At the end of the
school year there is a drop in revenues. The program is monitored
monthly and is done for each school individually as well as on an
aggregate. Certain schools lose money and the other schools make
up for it. Mr. Baird also explained that in Middle Six there is a
program called Right Stuff, which is supported by a grant, and his
goal is to have the after-school program cover the Right Stuff
program as well, and to make the entire program work without
taxpayers' money.
Commissioner Adams noted that the analysis did not include
costs of administration and felt that was wrong.
Director Baird explained that the Board did not want to
recapture any but direct cost. The original policy statement was
not to make any money and not to lose money so that taxpayers do
not subsidize the program.
Commissioner Adams felt that the after-school program should
cover not only supervised play but should also address possible
academic problems.
Recreation Director Pat Callahan explained that the individual
school administers the program to suit the particular needs of that
24
school. At some schools the PTA has become involved and some
programs are very creative.
Commissioner Adams was concerned with government infringing on
private industry and encouraged a study of the costs to have
private day care centers contract for an after-school program on a
county -wide basis.
Commissioner Bird understood the concerns of the day care
industry, but the Commission's main concern is the children. At
the present time we have over 500 children taking advantage of this
after-school program. If we discontinued it, he estimated only 75
of those children would find their way to a private day care center
and the rest would be without a program. There is no perfect
solution, but he is convinced that the overall program is good.
Commissioner Tippin was not sure this is a Recreation
Department issue but rather a School Board issue.
Recreation Director Callahan explained that the program was
started to address the needs of children in 3rd, 4th and 5th grades
who would otherwise go home to an empty house, basically latch -key
kids, and it has blossomed. The hope is to get all the schools
involved at a break-even level, and then offer the program to the
School Board to operate.
Pat Donovan, Principal of Beachland Elementary School,
described a program at her school which was funded by a Full
Service Schools grant and was a pilot program to meet the needs of
at -risk children and families at Beachland. Ms. Donovan explained
that 7 weeks of that program at her school cost $5,000 and she
presently has $7,000 to run the program for the balance of the
school year. The program will cease in the middle of February
unless Beachland can be included in the County's after-school
program. Her plan is to use the Full Services Schools funds to
enrich the after-school program, utilizing volunteers and other
services in the community that may have to be sub -contracted. Ms.
Donovan expressed her concern for all children in the community and
pointed out that there are needy children and families who will be
enriched by this program.
Chairman Eggert asked, and Ms. Donovan responded that of the
386 students at Beachland, 92 are on free and reduced lunch; in the
after-school program at Beachland, 75 percent of the students were
on free and reduced lunch.
Susan Earlywine, PTA Present at Vero Beach Elementary School,
stated that there is a great need for the after-school program at
that school. She reported that every time she is late in picking
up her own children, there are several children sitting in the
school office at 4:00 and 4:30, waiting to be picked up. Principal
25
DEC 15'1992 BOOK F��;F X91
r- DEC 15
ons
BooK 88 F, GF 292
Gipson must call on the telephone to see when they will be picked
up. She stated that the PTA is prepared to get involved so that
the program is not free play but will be structured guidance for
the children and not just free play. Vero Beach Elementary has
single -parent teachers who are eager to work in this program and
get the extra money.
William Koolage, concerned citizen, described himself as an
irate citizen. He pointed out that the Commission appropriated
$10,000 for literature on environmentally sensitive land, and in
this instance we are talking about environmentally sensitive
children. He urged the Board to support this after-school program
for all children.
Lenora Quimby, owner of For Kids Only day care center, asked
for clarification of the issue being addressed by the Board.
Commissioner Bird explained that there is a recommendation
from the Parks & Recreation Committee to expand the after-school
program to Vero Beach, Glendale, Rosewood, and Beachland Elementary
Schools.
Ms. Quimby stated that the day care industry is not interested
in closing the after-school program but rather in helping to
provide services to low-income, latch -key children. At the same
time the day care center owners are interested in providing for
their own families. She cited figures on the numbers of children
in the community and the numbers of children being serviced by day
care centers. She stressed that the day care industry wants to
cooperate with the Commission and the schools. She opposed adding
Glendale, Rosewood and Beachland schools to the program because
they did not request to be added. Adding these schools to the
program five months into the school year will have a negative
effect on the day care centers that provide after-school services
for students at those three schools. Ms. Quimby pointed out that
she would not have purchased a new bus if she knew that these
schools would be included in the after-school program and cause her
to lose some children to the after-school program. Ms. Quimby
cited the estimated lost revenue to day care businesses and lost
revenue to the County. She stressed that this is not the time to
be taking anything out of our economy and away from small
businesses. Ms. Quimby suggested one option of charging
competitive rates for the after-school program to put the day care
centers on a level playing field with the County's after-school
program. A second option could be to request bids to see what the
private sector has to offer. A third option would be to continue
bussing the children from these schools to other schools where the
program has been in operation since the beginning of -the school
26
year. She urged the Board to consider carefully the recommendation
of the Parks & Recreation Committee before making a decision and to
work with the small business community.
Commissioner Bird realized there might be some negative effect
on the day care industry, but he could not see how the Board could
deny the program to these schools with a potential of 300 children
who need the after-school program.
Ms. Quimby suggested a committee of representatives of the
entire community be organized to study this issue.
Chairman Eggert pointed out that Children's Services is a good
place to organize a pilot program, and Principal Dugan of Rosewood
School is volunteering to try such a program.
Discussion ensued regarding the possible means of transporting
children to their homes as a part of an after-school program.
Recreation Director Callahan was opposed to limiting the
after-school program to certain schools and bussing the children
from several schools to a single school. She stated that it is
more comfortable for the children to be in familiar surroundings
with teachers and peers from their own school. There is also added
liability in transporting children on a bus.
Dawn Quinn, representative from LaPetite Academy, advised that
LaPetite has approximately 750 schools across the country and is a
top quality business. They have some cost-effective plans for
after-school care, by utilizing the schools, bringing in equipment
such as computers and tables for homework, and having people with
top-notch education credentials coming in with fresh hands. Ms.
Quinn stated that a packet was available to the Board, and was sent
to Mr. Dugan and the other elementary schools, describing
LaPetite's plans and expectations for meeting children's needs.
Chairman Eggert was in favor of Children's Services reviewing
that information and considering a pilot program, beginning with
Rosewood, and possibly on a bigger scale. She felt that the Board
should delay making a decision for a month to see if this
suggestion could be coordinated with the individual schools to
create a cooperative program.
Commissioner Bird did not think a study could be done in any
reasonable length of time because it would involve the School
Board, with the private day care operators using the school
buildings and facilities. He felt that it is a large project and
needed more time.
Commissioner Bird asked, and Recreation Director Callahan
responded that if the decision were made to expand the program to
all four schools, there would be no problem except, perhaps,
Glendale which does not have a teacher to run the program.
27
EC 15 1992 BOOK ® P',V F 91
rBOOK 88 pgF2 2
DF
� ��.94
Commissioner Adams thought that we should expand the program
to these schools because they indicated a need for it. She
believed the main complaint from the day care industry was unfair
competition, and we could cure that by charging a competitive
price.
Commissioner Bird stated that while that would put it on a
competitive level, it would kill our program. Right now the
program is paying for itself. Commissioner Bird realized that our
program affects the day care centers to some degree, but we are
helping 500 children who would not be able to go to private day
care.
Commissioner Macht emphasized that the Board has a
responsibility to provide supervision to the large population of
children who are at risk, and that does not necessarily mean
children who are economically deprived. He felt there is a wide
range of opportunity for the private sector to cooperate with
enhancement of this program, and as Chairman of Children's Services
he will put that on the agenda for discussion. In the meantime he
thought we must deal with the issue.
Rosemary Sparks, owner of Small Wonders day care center,
recounted her experiences in buying the business and the 3 years of
hard work to build it. She described it as a wonderful place for
children but it is being destroyed by government.
Chairman Eggert favored a decision to grant the one direct
request of Vero Beach Elementary School for the aftschool
program. Since the other three schools did not make a direct
request but were asked to join in the request, we should review how
the service will be rendered to the other three schools; whether it
will be purely through the Recreation Department or would involve
some private day care programs.
Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of waiting for the
results of a study.
Commissioner Macht asked Lenora Quimby if she is prepared to
present ideas to the Children's Services Committee, and Ms. Quimby
responded that she would like to see what suggestions the committee
will have.
Commissioner Bird reminded the Board that the School Board
must be involved, which will take some time.
Director Baird advised that staff cannot get the right answers
in 30 days if the Board plans to request bids from the day care
industry.
28
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
expansion of the Recreation Department's after-
school program to enable Vero Beach, Glendale,
Rosewood and Beachland Elementary Schools to
participate in the after-school program, and to
discuss with representatives of the day care
industry the possible ways of including private day
care centers in the after-school program.
ENVIRONMENTAL LAND ACQUISITION - IMMEDIATE COST SHARE FUNDING
The Board reviewed memo from Environmental Planning Chief
Roland DeBlois dated December 8, 1992:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP HEAD CONCURRENCE:
o ert M. Keating, AI
Community Developmmen�Tt� ti�re:or
FROM: Roland M. DeBlois ,�XICP
Chief, Environmental Planning
DATE: December 8, 1992
RE: Environmental Lands Acquisition:
Immediate Cost Share Funding Opportunities
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of December 15, 1992.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Since establishment of the county Land Acquisition Advisory
Committee (LAAC) two years ago and the Board's adoption of the Land
Acquisition Guide in May 1991, the County's policy has been to
maximize the use of matching funds and grants from the state and
federal government for the purchase and protection of environmental
lands. Because of the recently approved $26 million bond
referendum, the county now has the means to leverage some of these
funds by using them as matching funds for state grants.
At present, the opportunity exists for the county to apply for
state matching funds for two state land acquisition funding
programs. Because of impending application deadlines, however, the
county must now make a decision as to which LAAC site acquisition
proposals will be submitted for funding consideration.
29
DEC 5 1�9� BOOK �� Fr�,E5 "A
r DEC 15 1992
BOOK 88 F.V;E 206
The Florida Communities Trust Program (FCT) has recently opened its
application period; this period extends from November 1, 1992 to
January 15, 1993. Running somewhat concurrently, the application
period for the next cycle of the Conservation and Recreation Lands
(CARL) Program ends January 30, 1993.
An additional funding opportunity exists with the St. Johns River
Water Management District (SJRWMD). Although the SJRWMD does not
have a set application submittal timeframe, cost share funds that
are currently available may be unavailable in the not -to -distant
future due to funding competition and allocation uncertainties.
At their last regular meeting on November 18, 1992 the LAAC
considered which of the land acquisition sites undergoing their
review are appropriate for submittal in the present matching funds
application cycle. LAAC recommended 5 sites for submittal under
the various programs, with two additional sites to be submitted
contingent upon further review at their next meeting (January 6,
1992)• The LAAC's recommendations are described in more detail in
the following section.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
Overview of Funding Opportunities
As previously mentioned, there are a number of opportunities for
matching funds. These include: the Conservation and Recreation
Lands (CARL) program; the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) program;
the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) cost -share
program; and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service joint acquisition
program.
Each of the programs or agencies have their
evaluating the merits of projects submitted to
consideration. Generally, the criteria can
follows.
Program/Agency
CARL
FCT
SJRWMD
USFWS
General Criteria
own criteria in
them for funding
be summarized as
Large projects, resources of statewide
significance
Implementation of comprehensive plan,
willing seller (close to appraised value)
Water resources improvement and management
Resources of national significance
Attached is a "State and Federal Funding Opportunities" matrix
relating to the 10 LAAC sites presently under acquisition
consideration, plus the Sebastian Scrub "GDC" tract now undergoing
review by LAAC. The matrix indicates staff's viewpoint on which
sites have the best potential for the various funding
opportunities.
30
s � �
LAAC Recommendations
The attached funding opportunity matrix was presented and discussed
at the last LAAC meeting. LAAC voted to recommend that the Board
authorize staff to submit applications for the projects indicated
on the matrix, with the addition of the Lost Tree Village Islands
for submittal under the CARL program.
An additional site was discussed for inclusion in the FCT
applications under the "emergency acquisition" procedures of the
Land Acquisition Guide. The site is approximately ±110 acres of
xeric scrub owned by Lost Tree Village Corporation, located south
and west of the Johns Island West golf course, north of C.R. 510.
Staff conducted a preliminary review of the property in
coordination with the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission
(GFC), and find the property to be significant scrub habitat,
supporting_ rare and endangered species. LAAC tentatively
recommended that the Board authorize staff to submit an FCT
application for the site, contingent upon LAAC's further review and
approval at their meeting of January 6, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners accept
LAAC 's recommendations and authorize staff to submit the following
funding applications for 50% cost share:
CARL Program: Padgett Branch site
Lost Tree Village Islands site
FCT Program: Winter Beach Scrub site
-Sebastian Scrub ("GDC") site
"Johns Island West" Scrub site
SJRWMD: Salama/Lowenstein site
I.R. Boulevard South site
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously accepted
LAAC's recommendation and authorized staff to submit
the applications for 50 percent cost sharing as set
forth in staff's memorandum.
FINAL PAYMENT - 37TH STREET (BARBER AVENUE) - DESIGN OF WIDENING
AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
The Board reviewed memo from Public Works Director Jim Davis
dated December 2, 1992:
31
DEC 15 1992 900K 8 8 uF 29 7
DEC 15 0-2
BOOK 88 DIF -7
.98
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Final Payment - 37th Street(Barber Avenue)
Design of Widening and Drainage Improvement
DATE: December 2, 1992 --- FILE: lenz.dec
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
On July 7, 1992, H.F. Lenz contracted with Indian River County to
provide professional engineering and related services for the
design of widening and drainage improvements to 37th Street
between US 1 and Indian River Boulevard at a cost of $5,000.
After negotiations for stormwater permits with the SJRWMD, the
design had to be modified to include shallow water quality swales
to be constructed behind curb and gutter for treatment purposes
within the roadside recovery zone. This was additional work at a
cost of $500.
ANALYSIS AND ALTERNATIVES
Design has been completed and final payment is due. The
following alternatives are presented:
Alternative No. 1
Approve the final payment of $508.44, and additional
services in the amount of $500 as described above.
Alternative No. 2
Deny payment.
RECO101ENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approving Alternative No. 1 in the amount of
$508.44 under the original contract and $500 for additional
services for a total of $1408.44. Funds are available in
account #111-214-541-033.1%.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the final payment of $508.44 and additional services
in the amount of $500 for a total of $1,008.44, as
set out in staff's memorandum.
32
REQUEST FOR COUNTY TO GRADE UNPAVED ROADS WITH THE FOLLOWING
RIGHTS-OF-WAY:
1) 101ST COURT BETWEEN 90TH STREET AND 92ND STREET IN VERO LAKE
ESTATES SUBDIVISION
2) 79TH STREET BETWEEN 102ND COURT AND 102ND AVENUE IN VERO LAKE
ESTATES SUBDIVISION
3) 82ND STREET EAST OF U.S.1
The Board reviewed memo from Public Works Director Jim Davis
dated December 9, 1992:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Request for County to Grade Unpaved Roads
with the Following Right -of -Ways
1) 101st Court between 90th Street and 92nd
Street in Vero Lakes Estates Subdivision
(.25 mile) -
2) 79th Street between 102nd Court and
102nd Avenue in Vero Lakes Estates
Subdivision (.1 mile)
3) 82nd Street east of U.S. 1 (.15 mile)
DATE: December 9, 1992
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Public Works Department has received requests for the
County to assume road grading within the above subject
right-of-ways from property owners along the right-of-ways.
Since 1981, the County has not assumed the grading of
additional unpaved roads unless authorized by the Board of
County Commissioners after consideration of the results of a
numerical evaluation procedure adopted in 1981. In the
early 1980's, the County Attorney issued an opinion that the
County did not have an obligation to grade roads within
dedicated right-of-ways if those roads were not being
graded. The entire issue of maintenance of dedicated
ungraded right-of-ways in the County was discussed during
the March 5, 1991 and May 7, 1991 Board of County
Commissioners meeting (minutes attached). At that time, the
Staff was directed to continue the evaluation program but
was to recommend additional roads in Vero Lakes Estate to
be graded.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The above
follow:
.QIY O� �i P eq .ill
DEC 15 1992
subject roads were evaluated
33
and the results
BOOK ° "u
101st Court - 80 points
79th Street - 80 points
82nd Street - 35 points
BOOK
,E ,3
Based upon a minimum acceptance score of 100 points which
has been historically used, these roads do not qualify for a
positive staff recommendation to assume grading. There have
been instances, particularly within the 9,000 lot Vero Lakes
Estate Subdivision, where the Board has authorized
maintenance even though the 100 point score was not
attained.
During the March 5,
1991 meeting of
the
Board
of County
Commissioners, the
Board requested
staff to
consider
revising the minimum
score warrant in
Vero
Lakes
Estate due
to the unique nature
of the Subdivision.
Based
upon that
discussion, staff recommends lowering
the
minimum score to
75 points.
In the case of 82nd Street east of U.S. 1, a sufficient
Public Right -of -Way does not exist since this area has not
been platted.
The Alternatives are as follows:
Alternative No. 1
Deny the three -requests since the evaluation does
not result in a score of at least 100 points.
Encourage the property owners to apply for
petition paving.
Alternative No. 2
Approve the grading of 101st Court and 79th Street
based upon accepting a minimum score warrant of 75
points in the Vero Lakes Estate Subdivision. Deny
the request to grade 82nd Street due to
insufficient Public Right -of -Way.
Staff recommends Alternative No. 2 at this time due to the
Staff recommendation to lower the minimum warrant score to 75
points under the 1981 evaluation criteria. Funding to be
from Road and Bridge Division Operating Budget.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved
the grading of 101st Court and 79th Street and
denied the request to grade 82nd Street, as set out
in Alternative No. 2 in staff's memorandum.
34
EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO RINGS HIGHWAY BRIDGE OVER MAIN RELIEF CANAL
The Board reviewed memo from Public Works Director Jim Davis
dated December 11, 1992:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator _
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Directo
SUBJECT: Emergency Repairs to King's Highway Bridge over Main Relief Canal
DATE: December 11, 1992
The north bridge approach slab and embankment retaining wall beneath the King's Highway bridge
across the Main Relief Canal have failed resulting in closure of the bridge. Due to the extensive
undermining of the approach slab, the Road and Bridge Division removed the slab and discovered
that the 30' long steel sheet piling which retained the embankment has rusted through and failed.
Staff has contacted several contractors to replace the sheet piling, but only one contractor, B.K.
Marine, Inc. of Ft. Pierce, has materials available and can install them immediately. The cost for
materials and labor is approximately $18,900.00. The retaining wall must be 30' high and 65' wide,
including special corner sections.
Since the citrus hauling season and peak season traffic conditions are prevalent, the bridge must be
opened as soon as possible.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Since time is of the essence, staff instructed B.K. Marine to proceed with the work. The Road and
Bridge Division will backfill against the new retaining wall and pour a new concrete approach slab
with in-house resources.
Ki ulul�l►1� •0 1,11b
It is recommended that after -the -fact authorization be given to contract with B.K. Marine, Inc. for
furnishing and installing 65' L.F. x 30' deep steel sheet piling at the Kings Highway bridge across
the Main Canal at a cost not -to -exceed $18,900.
Funding is to be from Road and Bridge account #111-214-541-035.33 (bridge material - $25,000
budgeted).
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, to award the contract, after the
fact, to B. K. Marine, Inc., in the not -to -exceed
amount of $18,000 for emergency repairs to Kings
Highway Bridge over Main Relief Canal, as
recommended by staff.
35
DooK
DEC715 1992 BOOK 8O F,1GF 302
Director Davis further explained that staff are presently
analyzing the weight of the materials being used and we may have to
use thicker wall sheet piling, which will inflate the cost. He
asked for authorization to use the heavier material.
Commissioner Bird amended the motion to include authorization
to use the heavier materials.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
It was voted on and carried unanimously.
WATER EXPANSION PLAN PHASE I - CONTRACT 1• CHANGE ORDER 1 AND FINAL
PAY REQUEST
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated December 2, 1992:
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR/0-V UTI TY SERVICES
PREPARED H. D. 4440�ST', P. E.
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER EXPANSION PLAN PHASE I - CONTRACT 1
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -91 -02 -DS
CHANGE ORDER 1 AND FINAL PAY REQUEST
BACKGROUND
Construction of the subject project has been completed, and the
contractor, Boyce Company, of St. Petersburg, Florida, has made
application for final payment. The pay request includes an
increase of $36,905.52 as reflected on Change Order 1 (see
attached). The cost increase is due primarily to 1) extension of
Jack and bore casings to avoid utility lines, 2) the addition of
several services, and 3) an incrbase in the number of fittings used
as compared to the original estimate.
ANALYSIS
All Indian River County requirements have been met, and DER
clearance has been requested. The original contract price was
$928,215.60; the final contract price is $965,121.12, which
includes the change order. The contractor has previously been paid
$804,548.25; this leaves a remaining balance of $160,572.87.
On October 22, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners approved
Resolutions 1 and 2 of the subject project at a total construction- -
cost of $2,450,000.00.
36
Due to the size of the Phase I project, it was decided to separate
the construction project into five contracts. The project was
awarded as follows:
Contract #1
Contract #2
Contract #3
Contract #4
Contract #5
TOTAL
Boyce Company
Tri -Sure
Boyce Company
Boyce Company
Boyce Company
$ 928,215.60
192,070.00
229,283.61
313,723.57
327.167.01
$1,990,459.79
The total of all bids awarded as listed above was significantly
below the originally estimated construction cost of $2,450,000.00.
The projects are now complete, and the final construction costs are
listed below:
Contract #1
Contract #2
Contract #3
Contract #4
Contract #5
TOTAL
Boyce Company
Tri -Sure
Boyce Company
Boyce Company
Boyce Company
$ 965,121.12
175,505.00
214,139.13
275,422.22
309.011.41
$1,939,198.88
The final construction amount of $1,939,198.88 results in a figure
below the originally budgeted $2,450,000.00, and below the awarded
contract total of $1,990,459.70. Also, it should be noted that the
original project estimate did not include the 24" diameter water
transmission main added to Contract 1`on 5th Street SW from 27th
Avenue to the County's reverse osmosis plant. As a result of
extreme competitiveness among bidding contractors, we have
successfully completed the Water Expansion Plan Phase I project
well under budget, even though additional transmission main was
added to the project.
The Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the
attached change order and the payment request of $160,572.87 as
payment in full for services rendered.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the change order and payment request of $160,572.87
as payment in full to Boyce Company for Water
Expansion Plan Phase I, Contract 1, as recommended
by staff.
SAID CHANGE ORDER AND PAY REQUEST
ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
�Yi
DEC 15 1992 BOOK b8 F 3103
r SEC 15 1992
OOK 88 mrE3 4
WATER EXPANSION PLAN PHASE I - CONTRACT 4: CHANGE ORDER 1 AND FINAL
PAY REQUEST
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated December 2, 1992:
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE GAPINTA
DIRECT VICES
PREPARED H. D. " E.
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER EXPANSION PLAN PHASE I - CONTRACT 4
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -91 -02 -DS
CHANGE ORDER 1 AND FINAL PAY REQUEST
BACKGROUND
Construction of the subject project has been completed, and the
contractor, Boyce Company, of St. Petersburg, Florida, has made
application for final payment. The pay request includes a
reduction of $38,301.35 as reflected on Change Order 1 (see
attached). The cost reduction is due primarily to 1) utilizing
dual services in lieu of some single services, 2) using 1 1/2"
service lines in lieu of 2" service lines, and 3 ) a reduction in
the number.of fittings used compared to the original estimate.
ANALYSIS
All Indian River County requirements have been met, and DER
clearance has been received. The original contract price was
$313,723.57; the final contract price is $275,422.22, including the
Change Order. The contractor has previously been paid $243,499.34;
this leaves a remaining balance of $31,922.88.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the
attached change order and the payment request of $31,922.88 as
payment in full for services rendered.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the change order and the payment request of
$31,922.88 to Boyce Company for Water Expansion Plan
Phase I, Contract 4, as recommended by staff.
SAID CHANGE ORDER AND PAY REQUEST
ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
38
WATER EXPANSION PLAN PHASE I - CONTRACT 5: CHANGE ORDER 1 AND FINAL
PAY REQUEST
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated December 2, 1992:
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATO
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR IL SERVICES
PREPARED H. D. "D�,F.E.
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER EXPANSION PLAN PHASE I - CONTRACT 5
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -91 -02 -DS
CHANGE ORDER 1 AND FINAL PAY REQUEST
BACKGROUND
Construction of the subject project has been completed, and the
contractor, Boyce Company, of St. Petersburg, Florida, has made
application for final payment. -The pay request includes a
reduction of $18,155.60 as reflected on Change Order 1 (see
attached). The cost reduction is due primarily to 1) utilizing
dual services in lieu of some single services, 2) using 1 1/2"
service lines in lieu of 2" service lines, and 3) utilizing fewer
fittings than originally estimated.
ANALYSIS
All Indian River County requirements have been met, and DER
clearance has been received. The original contract price was
$327,167.01; the final contract price is $309,011.41, including the
Change Order. The contractor has previously been paid $268,395.42;
this leaves a remaining balance of $40,615.99.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the
attached change order and the payment request of $40,615.99 as
payment in full for services rendered.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the change order and payment request of $40,615.99
to Boyce Company as payment in full for Water
Expansion Plan Phase I, Contract 5, as recommended
by staff.
SAID CHANGE ORDER AND PAYMENT REQUEST
ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
39
DEC 15 1997 BOOK 8 F'.k�F.'D1�5
DEC 15 1112
BOOK 88 P.{ l -JA I
SLUDGE/SEPTAGE FACILITY RETAINAGE
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated December 2, 1992:
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINT
DIRECTOR UTIL SERVICES
STAFFED AND
PREPARED BY: H. D. S ER, P.E.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER.
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SLUDGE/SEPTAGE FACILITY
RETAINAGE
BACKGROUND:
The agreement with the contractor for the Sludge/Septage Facility
states that ten (10) percent of all monies earned by the Contractor
shall be retained by the County until the project is totally
completed as specified, and accepted by the County except that after
75 percent of the work has been satisfactorily completed, the
Contractor Administrator may reduce -the retainage to 3.5 percent of
all monies earned (see attached). Retainage was previously reduced
from 10 percent to 5 percent by approval of the Board of County
Commissioners on September 1, 1992 (see attached).
ANALYSIS:
The contractor, Poole & Kent, has completed 75% of the project and
requests that his retainage be reduced to 3.5% of all monies earned
in accordance with paragraph 5.2 of his agreement with the County
(letter with recommendations from Camp Dresser & McKee attached).
This action would reduce the retainage from $230,000.00 to
$161,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff of the Department.of Utility Services recommends approval
of the retainage reduction from 5% to 3.5% of monies earned.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
retainage reduction from 5 percent to 3.5 percent of
monies earned by Poole & Rent for the Sludge/Septage
Facility, as recommended by staff.
E,U]
WATER SERVICE IN KINGS HIGHWAY SUBDIVISION AND REPLAT OF BLOCKS 1
2, 3, AND 4, 39TH AND 40TH STREETS EAST OF KINGS HIGHWAY AND 56TH
AVENUE - RESOLUTION IV AND FINAL ASSESSMENT
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated December 3, 1992:
DATE: December 3, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTI VICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF AS PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER SERVICE IN KINGS HIGHWAY S/D AND
REPLAT OF BLOCKS 1, 21 3, AND 4, 39TH AND 40TH
STREETS EAST OF KINGS HIGHWAY AND 56TH AVENUE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -92 -13 -DS
RESOLUTION IV FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
BACKGROUND
On May 19, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved Resolution III, No. 92-78 for the
preliminary assessment roll on the above -referenced project. The
construction of the project has been completed. We are now ready
to begin customer connections and request the Board of County
Commissioners' approval of the final assessment roll (see attached
minutes and Resolution III).
ANALYSIS
The preliminary assessment was for a total estimated project cost
of $48,729.00, which equated to $0.07247489057 per square foot of
property owned. The final assessment (see attached Resolution IV
and the accompanying assessment roll) is in the amount of
$41,596.14, which equates to a cost of $0.061866 per square foot of
property.
RECOM DATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the adoption of Resolution
IV.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-227, certifying "as -built" costs for
installation of a waterline extension in Kings
Highway Subdivision, as recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION 92-227, WITH ASSESSMENT ROLL ATTACHED
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
41
®EC 1992 eooK F',:r307
BOOK 88 PAGF.9. 08
An Built (Final Reso.) - 12/3/92(legal)Vk/DC
RESOLUTION NO. 92- Uj
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR
INSTALLATION OF A WATERLINE EXTENSION IN
KINGS HIGHWAY SUBDIVISION AND REPLAT OF
BLOCKS 1, 21 39 AND 4, 39TH AND 40TH STREETS
EAST OF KINGS HIGHWAY, AND ALSO 56TH
AVENUE, AND SUCH OTHER CONSTRUCTION
NECESSITATED BY SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING
FOR FORMAL COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR
PAYMENT WITHOUT PENALTY AND -INTEREST.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County determined that the improvements for the property located
within the boundaries described in this title were necessary to promote
the public welfare of the county; and
WHEREAS, on Tuesday, May 19, 1992, the Board held a public
hearing at which time and place the owners of property to be assessed
appeared before the Board to be heard as to the propriety and
advisability of making such improvements; and
WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County
Commission adopted Resolution No. 92-78, which confirmed the special
assessment cost of the project to the property specially benefited by
the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual
"as -built" cost now that the project has been completed is less than in
confirming Resolution No. 92-78,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF
INDIAN
RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
as follows:
1. Resolution No.
92-78 is
modified as follows: The
completion date
for the referenced project and the last day that payment may be
made avoiding interest and penalty charges . is ninety days after
passage of this resolution.
42
z
2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum may be
made in ten annual installments, the first to be made twelve
months from the due date. The due date ig ninety days after the
passage of this resolution.
3. The final assessment roll for the project listed in Resolution No.
92-78 shall be as shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
4. The assessments, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A," shall
stand confirmed and remain legal, valid, and binding first liens
against the property against which such assessments are made
until paid.
5. The assessments shown on Exhibit "A," attached to Resolution No.
92-78, were recorded by the County on the public records of
Indian River County, and the lien shall remain prima facie
evidence of its validity.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Macht , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Lipa, ,
and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 15th day of December, 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
Caro,Yyn K. Eg
Ch91rman
43
DEC 151992*
BOOK 88 PUF
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION IV - THE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION -
41ST COURT WATER SERVICE PROJECT
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated November 19, 1992:
DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. P O
DIRECTOR OF UT SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF ASS PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL - RESOLUTION IV
THE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION - 41ST COURT
WATER SERVICE PROJECT
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -91 -31 -DS
BACKGROUND
On May 19, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved Resolution III, No. 92-77 for the
preliminary assessment roll on the above -referenced project.. -The
construction of the project has been completed. We are now ready
to begin customer connections and _request the Board of County
Commissioners' approval of the..final assessment roll (see attached
minutes and Resolution III).
ANALYSIS
The preliminary assessment was for a total estimated project cost
of $26,656.00, which equated to $0.08129059802 per square foot of
property owned. The final assessment (see attached Resolution IV
and the accompanying assessment roll) is in the amount of
$25,013.00, which equates to a cost of $0.076280 per square foot of
property.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the adoption of Resolution
IV.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 92-228, certifying "as -built" costs for
installation of a waterline extension in The Meadows
Subdivision (41st Court), as recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION 92-228, WITH ASSESSMENT ROLL ATTACHED,
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
44
As Built (Final Reso.)
E_ J
12/3/92(1ega1)Vk/Dc
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 228
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CERTIFYING "AS -BUILT" COSTS FOR
INSTALLATION OF A WATERLINE EXTENSION IN
THE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (41ST COURT), AND
SUCH OTHER CONSTRUCTION NECESSITATED BY
SUCH PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR FORMAL
COMPLETION DATE, AND DATE FOR PAYMENT
WITHOUT PENALTY AND INTEREST.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County determined that the improvements for the property located
within the boundaries described in this title were necessary to promote
the public welfare of the county; and
WHEREAS, on Tuesday, May 19, 1992, the Board held a public
hearing at which time and place the owners of property to be assessed
appeared before the Board to be heard as to. the propriety and
advisability of making such improvements; and
WHEREAS, after such public hearing was held the County
Commission
adopted
Resolution
No.
92-77, which
confirmed the special
assessment
cost of
the project
to
the property
specially benefited by
the project in the amounts listed in the attachment to that resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the Director of Utility Services has certified the actual
"as -built" cost now that the project has been completed is less than in
confirming Resolution No. 92-77,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. Resolution No. 92-77 is modified as follows:* The completion date
for the referenced project and the last day that payment may be
made avoiding interest and penalty charges is ninety days after
passage of this resolution.
45
DEC51992 BOOK 88 PAGE I- - I
t
BOOK 88 P1'
U.112 -7
2. Payments bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum may be
made in ten annual installments, the first to be made twelve
months from the due date. The due date is ninety days after the
passage of this resolution.
3. The final assessment roll for the project listed in Resolution No.
92-77 shall be as shown on the attached Exhibit "A."
4. The assessments, as
shown on the attached Exhibit
"A,"
shall
stand confirmed and
remain legal, valid, and binding
first
liens
against the property
against which such assessments
are
made
until paid.
5. The assessments shown on Exhibit "A," attached to Resolution No.
92-77,
were
recorded
by the County
on the public
records of
Indian
River
County,
and the lien
shall remain
prima facie
evidence of its validity.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Adams , and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n
and, upon . being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Vice Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 15th day of December, 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By � / L-1, ,, '-e— —
Caroly, K. Egger
;(
Chair an
46
FINAL PAY REQUEST - RINGS HIGHWAY SUBDIVISION
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated December 1, 1992:
DATE:
DECEMBER 1, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTIL SERVICES
STAFFED AND
PREPARED BY: ROBERT O. WISEMEN, P.E.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
. W
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: FINAL PAY REQUEST
KING"S HIGHWAY SUBDIVISION
IRC PROJECT NO. UW -92 -13 -DS
IRC BID NO. 92-99
BACKGROUND:
On July 7, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners awarded the subject project to Timothy Rose
Enterprises in the amount of $33,581.70 (see attached agenda item).
ANALYSIS:
The original contract amount of the project was $33,581.70.
Adjustments (which are reflected on the attached change order) were
made during construction, such as elimination of driveway cuts which
became unnecessary and a reduction in the amount of sod replaced
during restoration. One single short service was added as requested
by a homeowner. The net adjustments amount to a reduction of
$1,117.34, which reduces the final total contract amount to
$32,464.36.
The final pay request, including the ten percent retainage of
Payment No. 1, is $4,691.26.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve the attached change order and final pay
request to Timothy Rose Enterprises.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the change order and final pay request to Timothy
Rose Enterprises in the amount of $4,691.26, as
recommended by staff.
SAID CHANGE ORDER AND PAY REQUEST
ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
47
DEC 15 1992
BOOK
r- SDOK 88 pnf. 314
DEC 15 1992
WATER LINE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS - IBORA PARR GLEN ACRES AND COOKS'
SUBDIVISION - CHANGE ORDER 1
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated December 3, 1992:
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES -
PREPARED TERRY H. DRUM SERVICES -
.
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER LINE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS
IXORA PARK, GLEN ACRES, AND COORS' SUBDIVISION
IRC PROJECT NO. UW -92 -18 -DS
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
BACKGROUND
On November 10, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved the subject project in the amount of
$47,161.89 (see attached agenda item and minutes). Construction of
the subject project is approximately 60* percent complete. The
contractor, Driveways, Inc., of --Titusville, Florida, has submitted
a $12,310.44 change order for the construction labor to add an
additional 635 L.F. with appurtenances located along 18th Avenue
between 8th Street and 9th Street. This Change Order No. 1 has
been requested by the Department of Utility Services. The
estimated materials cost for this project will be $5,112.90 and
will be purchased by the Department of Utility Services using the
supplies and materials bid.
This additional project is a part of a continuing effort by this
department to replace galvanized water lines in Indian River
County. The additional funds will be from the Department's renewal
and replacement funds.
ANALYSIS
The original contract amount was $47,161.84. This Change Order No.
1 is in the amount of $12,310.44. The revised total labor contract
price will be in the amount of $59,472.28.
RECOMMENDATION
The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve Change Order No. 1.
Administrator Chandler explained that there were inaccuracies
in the as -built drawings and they added the 635 feet, which was
authorized by the Commission in November.
48
Commissioner Adams asked, and Director Pinto explained that
the galvanized pipe is very susceptible to corrosion and will be
replaced with PVC.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order No. 1 to the contract with Timothy Rose
Enterprices in the amount of $12,310.44, as
recommended by staff.
SAID CHANGE ORDER AND APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
DEVELOPER"S AGREEMENT WITH THE MOST REVEREND J. KEITH SYMONS
BISHOP OF THE DIOCESES OF PALM BEACH
The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry
Pinto dated November 9, 1992:
DATE: NOVEMBER 91 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED JOSE R. DIAZ
AND STAFFED PRIVATE PRO ER
BY: DEPARTMENT O LITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WITH THE MOST REVEREND J. KEITH
SYMONS, BISHOP OF THE DIOCESES OF PALM BEACH
BACKGROUND
The Department of Utility Services has received all the
documentation necessary to complete the operation checklist for a
water distribution system at the St. John of the Cross Catholic
Church project. This design called for the installation of a 6 -inch
diameter water line along 82nd Avenue. It was necessary to oversize
this line to 12 inches to meet the requirements of our Water Master
Plan. The Department of Utility -Services now proposes to enter into
a developer's agreement with The Most Reverend J. Keith Symons,
Bishop of the Dioceses of Palm Beach, to reimburse the difference in
cost of oversizing the above-mentioned line.
49
DEC mg? BOOK � F4OF )
BOOK 88 PAGE 316
ANALYSIS
The reimbursement for this construction will be as follows:
Item Total Reimbursement
12 -inch PVC water main $22,176.00
1848 LF of 6 -inch diameter oversizing
@ $2.00/inch equals $12.00/LF
The County shall reimburse the developer in the amount of $548.00
(amount of impact fee attritutable to Master Plan time extensions)
per Equivalent Residential Unit from the impact fee previously paid
by the developer. The Utilities Department is proposing to
reimburse the developer the remaining $21,628.00 immediately upon
the completion of the project from the impact fee fund. This is
being proposed due to the immediate ability to utilize the line for
further extension, as well as to reduce accounting associated with
reimbursement over time as additional customers connect to this
line.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the attached developer's
acireem.- t with The Most Reverend J. Reith Symons, Bishop of the
Dioceses of Palm Beach.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved
the developer's agreement with The Most Reverend J.
Reith Symons, Bishop of the Dioceses of Palm Beach,
for reimbursement as set out in staff's memorandum.
SAID AGREEMENT
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD
LETTER OF CONGRATULATIONS TO PETER GAMBLE ROBINSON II ON BEING
AWARDED BOY SCOUT EAGLE RANK: REOUESTED BY PETER AND DEBB ROBINSON
The Board reviewed the following letter from Mr. and Mrs.
Peter Gamble Robinson dated December 10, 1992:
411
December 10, 1992
Honorable Carolyn Eggert, Chairman
Indian River County Commission
1840 25th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Dear Carolyn:
Our son, Peter Gamble Robinson II, will be awarded Boy Scout Eagle Rank in an Eagle
Scout Ceremony Tuesday, December 29, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. Peter has worked diligently for
five years to attain this rank. As he attended Phillips Exeter Academy In New Hampshire
for three of the years, many of his Boy Scout requirements were accomplished as a Lone
Scout. Peter graduated from Exeter last June and is now a freshman in the Honors
Program at the University of Southern California and one of thirty-four members of the
Filmic Writing Program in the School of Motion Picture and Television.
We would very much appreciate your sending a letter of congratulations to be read at the
ceremony. As a young man seriously committed to God and to his country, we know he
will appreciate your interest as do we. Have a very Merry Christmas.
Best regards,
1� A. "o "�Lc
Peter and Debb Robinson
The members of the Board agreed to authorize the Chairman to
send a letter of congratulations to Peter Gamble Robinson II.
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
Chairman Eggert announced that immediately upon adjournment
the Board would reconvene sitting as the Commissioners of the Solid
Waste Disposal District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
Chairman Eggert announced that immediately upon adjournment
the Board would reconvene sitting as the Commissioners of the Solid
Waste Disposal District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 11:50 A. M.
ATTEST:
1� -
J. Barton, Clerk
51
Caroly K. Eg t, Chairman
BOOK 88 PAIF 31