HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/5/1993MINUTES ATTACHED
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARYS, 1993
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1840 25TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman ( Dist. 2) James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Fran B. Adams ( Dist. 1) -
Richard N. Bird (Dist. 5) Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Kenneth R. Macht ( Dist. 3 )
John W. Tippin (Dist. 4) Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9:00 A. M. 1. CALL TO ORDER
2. A. INVOCATION - Rev. Buddy Tipton
Central Assembly
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Fran Adams
3. A. CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS - CAROLYN K. EGGERT
B. ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN
C. ELECTION OF VICE CHAIRMAN
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/ EMERGENCY ITEMS
Delete 9.A. at request of Frank Zorc
Add 7.E. Acceptance of correction to Surety Bond for Ann Robinson
Add 13.B. Resignation of Joyce Johnston from Children's service
Advisory Committee
5. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Regular Meeting - November 17, 1992
B Regular Meeting - -November 24, 1992
7. CONSENT AGENDA .
A. Approval of Appointment of Deputy Sheriff by
Sheriff Tim Dobeck: Jeffrey T. Bavar
B. Minutes of Quarterly Meeting of Board of
Supervisors of Sebastian River Control District
held on Wednesday, December 2, 1992
C. Florida Contraband Forfeiture Semi -Annual Report
( memorandum dated November 25, 1992 )
JAN 51993
•30dd
X009
!.�R
s.
9:05 a. m. 9.
BOOK FAGF.�
CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd. ):
D. Appointment of Elizabeth Hubbard as Alternate
Representative on Transportation Disadvantaged
Local Coordinating Board
( memorandum dated December 23, 1992 )
E. Approval of Surety Bond for:
Jeffrey K. Barton
Duncan A. Chalmers
Margaret A. Ingram
�arl ZA*Tmermann
ran ams
F. Vero Beach High School Girls Golf Team Playing
Privileges
( memorandum dated December 18, 1992)
G. Cancellation of Taxes on Certain Property
Acquired by Indian River County
( memorandum dated December 18, 1992 )
H. Release of 8 Utility Liens/12th St. Water Proj.
( memorandum dated December 16, 1992 )
CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
Discussion of Support & Resolution to Rename
17th St. Bridge - James T. Vocelle Bridge
( letter dated December 15, 1992 )
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDIN-
ANCE 8 THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP
FROM CH TO IL, FOR THE PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF 16TH ST. & 90TH AVE., AND
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING
FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
( memorandum dated December 3, 1992) ----
2. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDIN-
ANCE 6 THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP
FROM IL TO CG, FOR THE PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF 45TH ST. & THE FLORIDA
EAST COAST RR TRACKS, AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN, E PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
( memorandum dated November 25, 1992 )
3. AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDIN-
ANCE E THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP
FROM A-1 TO RS -3, FOR THE PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF 4TH ST. BETWEEN 43RD AVE. & 58TH_
AVE., & DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PRO-
VIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE
( memorandum dated November 25, 1992 )
J
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS -
- None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
None
B. EMERGENCY SERVICES
None
C. GENERAL SERVICES
I.R.C. Judicial Complex Project Closed
Circuit Video/Voice Transmission System
( memorandum dated December 17, 1992 )
D. LEISURE SERVICES -
None
E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
None
F. PERSONNEL
None
G. PUBLIC WORKS
1. Sandridge Golf Course New 18
Amendment No. 6
( memorandum dated December 28, 1992 )
2.
Sandridge Golf Course Clubhouse, Cart
Storage E Maintenance Buildings
Change Order No. 4
( memorandum dated December 16, 1992 )
3.
Resolutions to Provide for the Paving
8 Drainage Improvements to and set
Public Hearing Date for: 91st Ave.
between 79th St. 8 87th St. in Vero
Lake Estates
( memorandum dated December 21, 1992 )
H. UTILITIES
1.
Utility Service to 1-95 on Rt. 60; Hill
Gas Station ( Citgo) Developers Agreement
( memorandum dated December 14, 1992) -
2.
Water Service in Shady Oaks S/D (East of
-
43rd Ave., south of Oslo Road)
( memorandum dated December 18, 1992 )
12. COUNTY
ATTORNEY
None
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS
memorandum dated December 28, 1992)
JAN 51993 BOOK 88 PACE .'3'1
F"" -,AN 1993
1
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (contd.):
B. CHAIRMAN CAROLYN K. EGGERT
C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS
D.. VICE CHAIRMAN RICHARD N. BIRD
E. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MRCHT
F. COMMISSIONER JOHN W. TIPPIN
14. SPECIAL DISTRICT'S
A. EMERGENCY SERVICES- DISTRICT
None
B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
Two Ram Baler - Recycling Operations
( memorandum dated December 18, 1992 )
15. ADJOURNMENT
BOOK
..0-
t �
.0.,
t�
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH ►r-,, i -6t NYA6E
AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MAY
CONTACT THE COUNTY'S -AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X 408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF
MEETING.
Tuesday, January 5, 1993
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers,
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, January 5, 1993,
at 9:00 A. M. Present were Carolyn K. Eggert, Chairman; Richard N.
Bird, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Kenneth R. Macht, and John W.
Tippin. Also present were James E. Chandler, County Administrator;
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Deputy Clerks Barbara
Bonnah and Diane Albin.
The Chairman called the meeting to order, and Commissioner
Adams led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS - CAROLYN K. EGGERT
Chairman Eggert thanked Administrator Chandler and staff for
a unique and challenging year. She thanked Vice Chairman Richard
Bird for his help throughout the past year and conveyed that she
enjoyed having the new Commissioners on the Board. She related
that every year she becomes more appreciative of the absolutely
fine job everyone on staff does and listed some of the
accomplishments of the past year, including preparation of an
Affordable Housing Plan, LDRs, ordinances, north extension of
Indian River Boulevard, breaking ground on the Courthouse, business
tax incentives, completion of the second 18 holes at Sandridge,
opening South County Park, and the Land Acquisition referendum.
She commented that the BCC has tried to the very best of its
ability to be responsive to the needs of the community.
ELECTION QVICHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN -FOR 1993
Chairman .Eggert turned the meeting over to Attorney Vitunac
for election of a new Chairman.
JAN 5 1993 BOOK 88 r'1'UE 3 S' 33,
r JAN 5 1993
BOOK 88 Pn- 384
Attorney Vitunac opened the floor for nominations for Chairman
for 1993.
Chairman Eggert nominated Commissioner Richard N. Bird, and
Commissioner Macht seconded the nomination.
There being no other nominations, Attorney Vitunac closed the
nominations.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht,-the Board unanimously ei*cted
Commissioner Richard N. Bird as Chairman of the
Indian River County Board of County Commissioners
for 1993.
Commissioner Eggert turned over the gavel to Chairman Bird,
who opened the floor for nominations for Vice Chairman for 1993.
Commissioner Eggert nominated Commissioner John W. Tippin, and
Commissioner Adams seconded the nomination.
There being no other nominations, Chairman Bird closed the
nominations.
ON MOTION by Commissioner—Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously -elected
Commissioner John W. Tippin as Vice Chairman for
1993.
The Commissioners commended Commissioner Eggert for the
tremendous job she did in 1992 and noted that despite her injury
she led the Board in a very productive year.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Chairman Bird advised that Item 9A was withdrawn at the
request of Frank Zorc, and requested the addition of the following:
7.E. Acceptance of correction to Surety Bond for Ann
Robinson
13.B. Resignation of Joyce Johnston from Children's
Services Advisory Committee
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously added the
above items to the Agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The Chairman asked if there were any additions or corrections
to the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of November 17 or November
24, 1992. There were none. _
Pa
� � r
ON -MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board approved the Minutes
of the Regular Meetings of November 17 and November
24, 1992, as written.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. ARRroval of Appointment of Deuuty Sheriff by Sheriff Tim
Dobeck: Jeffrey T. Bavar
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the following appointment of Deputy Sheriff by
Sheriff Tim Dobeck:
Jeffrey T. Bavar
B. Report
Received and placed on file in the Office of the Clerk to the
Board:
Minutes of Quarterly Meeting of Board of Supervisors of
Sebastian River Control District held on Wednesday,
November 25, 1992.
C. Florida Contraband Forfeiture Semi -Annual Report
The Board reviewed the following memo dated November 25, 1992:
R.T. 'TIM" DOBECK • 1NDMNRNER COUNTY
P.O. BOIL am MEMBER FLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION
PHONE Q�00 MEMBER OF NATIONAL SHERIFFS ASSOc1ATION
VERO BEACH. FLORIDA 329610608
RECEIVED
November 25, 1992 NOV 3 0 1992
Budget Office
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Joe'Baird, Budget Director
FROM: Richard Dees, Comptroller
RE: Florida Contraband Forfeiture Semiannual Report
Attached is the Semiannual Report for the period ending September
30, 1992.
If you have any questions or any further information is required'
please let me know.
Richard Dees, Comptroller
RD/ssr
3
JAN 5 1993 BOOK 88 PAGE 385
JAN 5199;;
8..00K 88 O(YF 3 , ;r 6 -7
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously accepted
the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Semi -Annual Report
for the period ended September 30, 1992.
FLORIDA CONTRABAND FORFEITURE SEMIANNUAL REPORT
AGENCY Indian River County Sheriff's Office ORI#
Semiannual Period Beginning July 1, 199i' Ending Sentembes<--30, 1992
Beginning Balance Available for
Law Enl rcement Trust Fund
Coliectlons: (Pureuant to MS32 F.S.)
Sale Proceeds
Fartelled Cash
Interest Earned
Other Recta (spur)
Total Collectlorn
Diabursem
Lion Satlstacdons
Storage, Maintenance
and Swmly
Agerw Fi rtelture Costs
Court costa
Remdtaws to Law
EnhxcementTrust Fund
Reversion
Total Disbursements
Ending Balance Available for
Law En tore"umt Trust Fund
Approprbltlons Received frau
4150-775.14 GOveming Body (Ilaeei yeantoddate)
Expenditures: (fiscal Year-to-date)
$ PART A
$ 34 , 877.20
$ 1, 887.27 ProtradedlComplex Invesdgatlons
$ Tedudcai Equonant
Techndcal Expeffte
$_36L.764.47 Matching Funds for Federal Grams
Other Law Ent =mem Purposes
PART B"
$
School Remote Offer Program
= Safe Neighbodgod Program
$ Crime Prevendan Program
$ Drug Abttse Eftodon Program
Preverdon Program
$27,008.00 p �T Program
(7,914.80 )
$19,093.20 Total Expenditures
Appropriation Balance
$168,446.41 (itscalyeat-toodets)
:206.518 _ 20 ,
s
i
i 46_ROS_00
= laa•_713,20
$
s
s
: 1s_000.0a
$206.518.20
$ - 0 -
Previous Rum Year's Total Cofledbrrx $
' Note: Age #0 reeelved "at !asst $1S,0Q punwarn to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act within a ftcal year must expend or donate no low than
15% of such proceeds for the support or operation of any drug treatment, drug abuse education, drug prevention, crime preventlon, safe neighborhood, or
school resource offlow progrem(s)." (Items listed In Expenditures - Part B above)
SeWonn 932.705(8)(a), Florida Statutes: as amended 1992, req *w that, "Every low artorcement agcy shag subm t sardarmuW reports to the Department of Law
Erdomement indicating whether the agen q has seized or forfeited property under the Florida Contraband Fadebwe Act.'
el nnrn A A#%&VV45 A n A \Ir% Cr%nCCr n rnr @C\II aLnu t A t r+r-rn.•►
FORFEITED PROPERTY
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED VALUE
COURT CASE NUMBER
and TYPE OF OFFENSE
DISPOON OF PROPERTY
and ANY PROCEEDS RECEIVED*
Adger/NcNichol, cash 101000.00
91-0657
Johnson, cash
To Sheriff - L.E.T.F.
410.00
91-57562
•
Elland 24,372.06
91-14187 ,
4
D. Appointment of Elizabeth Hubbard as Alternate Representative on
Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County
Commissioners
FROM: Alice E. White
Administrative Secretary
DATE: December 23, 1992
The Department of Elder Affairs has nominated Elizabeth Hubbard
as their alternate representative on the Transportation
Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board.
Please approve the appointment of Ms. Hubbard as alternate
representative for the Department of Elder Affairs.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved.
the appointment of Elizabeth Hubbard as alternate
representative for the Department of Elder Affairs.
5
JAN 5 1993 boa 88
JAN 519- BOOK 8
E. Approval of Surety Bonds
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the surety bonds for Jeffrey R. Barton, Duncan A.
Chalmers, Margaret A. Ingram, Karl Zimmermann, Fran
Adams, and accepted a correction to the surety bond
for Ann Robinson.
COPIES OF BONDS ARE ON FILE
IST THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
F. Vero Beach High School Girls Golf Team Playing Privileges
The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 18, 1992:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER, COU 7fADMINISTRATOR
DATE: DECEMBER 18, 19921l-.^
FROM: BOB KOMARINETWIMECTOM OF GOLF
SUBJECT: VERO BEACH H" SCHOOL GIRLS GOLF TEAM PLAYING
PRIVILEGES ��//
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS �-
The last three years the Board of County Commissioners approved
the Vero Beach High School Girls Golf Team use of the Sandridge
Golf Club --for their practice sessions and golf matches. Enclosed
Is a letter from Mr. Doug Baker, Golf Coach requesting again the
use of the Sandridge Golf Club facilities for 1993.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners to approve the
Vero Beach Girls Golf Team the use of the facilities for practice
sessions and golf matches at the Sandridge Golf Club.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the use of the facilities at the Sandridge Golf Club
by the Vero Beach Girls Golf Team for practice
sessions and golf matches, as recommended by staff.
6
G. Cancelration of Taxes on Certain Property Acquired by Indian
River County
The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 18, 1992:
TO: The Board of County Commissioners
FROM: William G. Collins II - Deputy County Attorney
DATE: December 18, 1992
SUBJECT: Cancellation of Taxes on Certain Property Acquired by Indian
River County
For your consideration, a resolution has been prepared for the purpose of
cancelling any delinquent or current taxes which may exist on the following
property acquired by Indian River County for public purpose:
Right -of -Way acquired from GOLDEN RIVER FRUIT CO., a Florida
corporation, and fully described in that Quit -Claim Deed recorded in
Official .Record Book 954, Page 2470-2471, Public Records of Indian
River County, Florida.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to execute the
Resolution cancelling certain taxes upon publicly owned lands, and the Clerk
to send a certified copy of same to the Tax Collector so that any delinquent
or current taxes can be cancelled.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 93-1, cancelling certain delinquent taxes
upon publicly owned lands, pursuant• to Section
196.28, Florida Statutes, as recommended by staff.
7
L_ JAN 5 1993 BOOK
Fpw--
JAN 5 199
HOK
RESOLUTION NO. 93-1
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CANCELLING CERTAIN TAXES UPON
PUBLICLY OWNED LANDS, PURSUANT TO SECTION
198.289 FLORIDA STATUTES.
WHEREAS, section 196.28, Florida Statutes, allows the Board of
County Commissioners of each County to cancel and discharge any and all
liens for taxes, ..delinquent or current, held or owned by the --county or the
state, upon lands heretofore or hereafter conveyed to or acquired by any
agency, governmental subdivisic`,n, or municipality of - the state, cisr the _ United
States, for road purposes, defense purposes, recreation, reforestation, or
other public use; and
WHEREAS, such cancellation must be by resolution of the Board of
County Commissioners, duly adopted and entered upon its minutes properly
describing such lands and setting forth the public use to which the same are
or will be devoted; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of a certified copy of such resolution,
proper officials of the county and of the state are authorized, empowered,
and directed to make proper entries upon the records to accomplish such
cancellation and to do all things necessary to carry out the provisions of
section 196.28,*F.S.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that any and all
liens for taxes delinquent or current against the following described lands,
which were acquired for right-of-way from GOLDEN RIVER FRUIT CO. , a
Florida corporation, are hereby cancelled pursuant to the authority of
section 196.28, F.S.
See attached Quit -Claim Deed describing lands,
recorded in O.R. Book 954, Pages 2470-2471,
Public Records of Indian River County,
Florida.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eaaert ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Ti ppi n , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
'Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 5 day of January , 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attest: ,�.•.•
; rgv�� Barton,, Cler W � •
0 �+ W
By
Richard N. Bird , Chairman
8
Inman Rove Ca Aptroved
Dale
Admin
Legal ;
Iz.•t'8•
BudgetDevi.
Risk Mgr.
V.. .,. .. 1. -
H. Release of 8 Utility Liens - 12th Street Water Project
The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 16, 1992:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
*.#— J`, 44��
FROM: Lea R. Keller, CIA, County Attorney's Office
DATE: December 16, 1992
RE: RELEASE OF 6 UTILITY LIENS
12TH STREET WATER PROJECT
The attached release of lien covers eight properties which were
originally included to be served by the 12th Street water project;
however, these properties are on a private road and cannot receive
service. Therefore, the liens which were recorded on the public records
at the time of the preliminary assessment now need to be released.
The attached lien release is in proper form for the Chairman to sign on
behalf of the Board of County Commissioners.
REQUEST: The Board approve the release and authorize the Chairman to
sign.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the following lien -related document, as recommended
by staff.
RELEASE AND EXHIBIT ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING - HOLMES, ET AL REQUEST TO REZONE 20.88 ACRES FROM
HEAVY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
The hour of 9:05 A.M. having passed, the County Attorney
announced that this Public Hearing had been properly advertised as
follows:
9
L_ JAN 5199-1. BOOK 88 PAGE 3 I
rp'-JAN 5 1993
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
L
in the matter of
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of
A-,,,*�
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been -
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before ne this � t ay of� /��/.19 'LZ_
a f.( -(Business /Manager)
r �
(SEAL)
�o►�l' Pub k, Stole of Remdu
Qtr Camds m Expires .luny► 29, 1"$
BOOK PAGE:,
i ject Property F
NOTICE - PUMM NEnnM
f gearing to oonsider the of a fi�
District to L U&d D�tr y
Mena" But
hones Moody, Robert C 66 Nei.
arty Parks. the sub�Ct p ig �p
e nor�reeeat corner of 18 rth° Se& and
re. and: conteire approximately 20.89
P3 erly Iles In the sou8ieast t/a
sectgin ionInd3 Rim 33S, R� 3,.
heartrrg at which parties Fes' ,
„ Guterest and
Ithe an oaPP ' tom a
n h� eCa
cow
at 1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Fbr
ay, dernary 5,1993, at 9:05 a.m.. may
ng�dis o the district adopt
sided H Is: w(tHn the am gyral use
° � a who may this g wf9 �Aim I
We that a verbatkn record of the.'W- Kftw
ly �
made, which • the testimonr..apd
•,Wwhich the appeal is based.
evidenoe
I AnYOW who reeds a speciat accarromMon for
`.. this D Urw�mUst rtontaot the county's AmeAmericansCa
Wf h isablIl Act (ADA) Cowdi star at 597 -WW :s
odahsbn 408 at least 48 houns h advance of
Indian Rimh
rr
GmVrdSSbWsMd
ggyy Kt
Dec. It,, 992992 ' Guelrman , "857814
907
Community Development Director Bob Keating made the following
presentation:
10
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M.Reat ,ng,A=P
Community Dev lop t Director
THRU: Sasan Rohani
Chief, Long -Rang Planning
FROM: John Wachtel
Staff PI r, Long -Range Planning
DATE: December 3, 1992
RE: DAVID 0. HOLMES AND OTHERS REQUEST TO REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 20.88 ACRES FROM CH TO IL (RZON 92-09-0033)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular.
meeting of January 5, 1993.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This is a request to rezone approximately 20.88 acres from CH,
Heavy Commercial District, to IL, Light Industrial District.
Located at the northwest corner of 16th Street and 90th Avenue,
the subject property consists of the 16 lots that make up the
Interstate Commercial Park. The owners are David 0. Holmes, John
Wallace, Guy Mathews, Betsy Mathews, James Moody, Robert Cook, Dan
Nelson, and Larry Parks.
The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary zoning to
develop the property with industrial uses such as light
manufacturing. It is the applicants' position that there is more
of a need for industrially zoned land than for commercially zoned
land. The applicants cite as evidence the fact that the CH zoned
subject property is nearly vacant, while the adjacent, IL zoned
Pine Tree Industrial Park is 100% occupied.
On November 12, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0
to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this
request to rezone the subject property to IL.
Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject_I=operty is zoned CH,== Heavy Commercial District, and
has already been subdivided. The Belvedere Construction Company is
located on lot 3., and Coastal Van Lines, Inc. is located on lot 13.
All of the other lots are vacant. To the north of the subject
property is Pine Tree Industrial Park which is zoned IL, Light
Industrial District, and contains various warehouse and
manufacturing uses. West of the subject property is I-95. The
area to the south of the subject property is zoned RMH-81 Mobile
Home Residential District (up to 8 units/acre) and contains the
Lakewood Village mobile home park. The area to the east of the
subject property is zoned CH, -Heavy Commercial District, and
contains the Gracewood Fruit Company Packing House.
11
JAN 51993 BOOK 88 PAGE -393
F' -JAN 5)
Future Land Use Pattern
-7 BOOK 88 PnF. 394
The subject property is currently designated C/I, Commercial/
Industrial on the future land use map. Properties to the north,
east, and west are also currently designated C/I. Land to the
south is designated M-1, Medium -Density Residential, on the future
land use map. The M-1 designation permits residential uses with a
density up to 8 units/acre.
Environment
Approximately 50% of the commercial subdivision has been previously
cleared of vegetation, with the remaining undeveloped lots
consisting largely of slash pines .and myrtle shrubs,- ._Although a
wetland survey has not been conducted, county environmental
planning staff have identified a small depressional area on the
north portion of the property; this depressional area may be a
Jurisdictional wetland of marginal quality.
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county.
Wastewater lines extend to the site from the West County Wastewater
Plant. The South County Water Plant provides potable water to the
site.
Transportation System
The property has access to 90th Avenue. Ninetieth Avenue is
classified as a collector roadway on the future roadway
thoroughfare plan map. This -segment of 90th Avenue is a 2 -lane
paved road with approximately 50 feet of existing public road
right-of-way. It is programmed for expansion to 60 feet of public
right-of-way by 2010.
Zoning District Differences
There are many similarities and -some differences between the
existing CH zoning district and the proposed IL district. These
are best illustrated by the respective purpose statements of each
of the two districts. These purpose statements are as follows:
• CH, Heavy Commercial District, is intended to provide areas
for establishments engaging in wholesale trade, major repair
services and restricted light manufacturing activities. The
CH district is further intended to provide support services
necessary for the development of commercial and industrial
uses allowed within other non-residential zoning districts.
• IL, Light Industrial District, is intended to provide
opportunities for limited manufacturing and industrial uses
and to promote the establishment of employment centers which
are accessible to urban services and facilities, the area
labor force, and local industrial and business markets while
minimizing the potential for any adverse impacts upon nearby
Properties.
In terms of permitted uses, the principal difference between the CH
and IL zoning districts is that most manufacturing uses that are
permitted within the IL zoning district (such as the manufacturing
of tobacco products, textile products, lumber -and .wood, furniture
and fixtures, rubber products, drugs and pharmaceuticalst footwear,
and electronic equipments are not allowed within the CH zoning
district. As a transitional type of zoning district having more
intense uses than general commercial districts and less intense
12
uses than industrial districts, the CH district is oriented to uses
such as warehouses, contractor trades, and repair establishments.
ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the
application will be presented. The analysis will include a
description of:
• concurrency of public facilities;
• compatibility with the surrounding area;
• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
• potential impact on environmental quality.
Concurrency of Public Facilities
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area
deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan
establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use
Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary
to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community.
The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be
reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these
services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no
development shall be approved .unless it is consistent with the
concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is
required.
As per section 910.07 of the County's Land Development Regulations,
conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of
each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning
requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the
subject property based upon the requested zoning district. For
commercial or industrial rezoning requests, the most intense use
(according to the county's LDR's) is retail commercial with 10,000
square feet of gross floor area per acre of land proposed for
rezoning. The site information used for the concurrency analysis
is as follows:
1. Size of Property: ±20.88 acres
2. Size of Area to be Rezoned: ±20.88 acres
3. Existing Zoning Classification: CH, Heavy Commercial
-4. Existing Land Use Designation: C/ I, Commercial/
Industrial
5. Proposed Zoning Classification: IL, Light Industrial
6. Most Intense Use under Proposed Zoning Classification:
±208;800 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in
the 5th Edition ITE Manual).
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of
the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not
increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency
requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency
review because the requested zoning would not increase the use
intensity of the site.
By changing the zoning of the subject property from CH to IL,
various uses not currently allowed will be permitted on the site.
However, because the most intense use of the property would be the
13
JAN 5 1993 BOOK 88 NaGF. 39
i
Fr, -j A H 5 1993
same with either zoning
from CH to IL will no
concurrency facilities.
BOOK PA -7
u .3.96
district, changing the property's zoning
t create any additional impacts on any
In this case, the subject property is already platted and is
partially developed. When any of the remaining unbuilt lots are
proposed for development, a more detailed concurrency analysis will
be conducted during the development approval process.
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
It is- staff's position that a light industrial zoning district
would be appropriate for the subject property and would result in
development compatible with surrounding property. Because the area
to the north is already zoned for and developed with light
industrial uses, rezoning the subject property would -result in an
extension of an existing land use pattern. For those already
developed lots on the subject property, the existing uses are all
permitted uses within the IL zoning district; so the proposed
rezoning will not create any non -conforming uses.
The principal impacts of this request would be on the Lakewood
Village mobile home park to the south. There are, however, several
circumstances which would serve to mitigate the potential impacts
associated with this request. First, 16th Street serves as a
physical separation between the subject property and the existing
mobile home park. Due to the configuration of the properties,
required setbacks, the location of drainage easements, and the
existence of 16th Street, no mobile home will be closer than 80
feet to any development on the subject property. Most mobile homes
will be over 100 feet from development on the subject property.
Additionally, all industrial development is required. to undergo
site plan review. Through this process, potential impacts will be
minimized with site design. Finally, the large overlap of uses
permitted under both the proposed IL zoning district and the
existing CH zoning district reduces the chances that granting this
request will result in an increase in impacts on the adjacent
mobile home area. For these reasons, the proposed rezoning can be
expected to have an insignificant impact on the adjacent property.
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of
the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the
overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use
Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation,
conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their
densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in
nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of
the Comprehensive Plan. Policies are statements in the plan which
identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct
the community's development. As courses of action committed to by
the county, policies provide the basis for all county development
decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are important,
some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning
requests. Of particular applicability for this request are Future
Land Use Element Policies 1.17 and 4.3, and Economic Development
Policies 1.1, 1.4, and 1.5.
- Future Land Use Policy 1.17
Future Land Use Policy 1.17
designation is intended for
materials processing, heavy
storage and similar uses
states that the industrial land use
uses such as manufacturing, --assembly,
repair se:cvices, outdoor -equipment
as well as supportive and related
14
commercial uses. In addition, this policy states that all
industrial uses must be located within an existing or future urban
service area.
Since the =subject property is located within a commercial/
industrial node within the county's urban service area, the
proposed request is consistent with Future Land Use Policy 1.17.
- Future Land Use Policy 4.3
Future Land Use Policy 4.3 states that activity centers, such as
industrial centers, shall be located within commercial and
industrial nodes to ensure efficient utilization of the
transportation network. Since the subject property is within a
commercial/ industrial node, the proposed request is consistent with
Future Land Use Policy 4.3.
- Economic Development Policies 1.1, 1.4, and 1.5
These policies state that the county shall:
• encourage the expansion of
attraction of new industries
"high tech" industries.
existing businesses and the
and businesses, including clean
• promote the growth of businesses which provide skilled and
semi -skilled jobs with salaries higher than minimum wages.
• focus its industrial expansion efforts on attracting and
expanding clean, small-scale light manufacturing and assembly
concerns.
Granting this request would increase the number of industrial sites
within the county. Presently, there is only one area within this
node that is near four major roads, platted, has water and
wastewater service available, and is industrially zoned. This is
the Pine Tree Industrial Park which is 100% occupied and adjacent
to the shbject property. Rezoning the subject property to IL would
implement Economic Development Policies 1.1, 1.4, and 1.5 by
creating industrially zoned property with the necessary amenities
to attract well paying, small-scale, clean, high-tech, light
manufacturing industries. Therefore, the proposed request is
consistent with Economic Development Policies 1.1, 1.4, and 1.5.
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
It is staff's position that the proposed rezoning would have no
adverse impacts on environmental quality. Since each existing lot
on the subject property is under 5 acres in size, county native
upland preservation requirements do not apply. Removal of
.protected trees on site, however, will be subject to the county's
tree protection ordinance criteria. In addition, any
jurisdictional wetland identified on site will be subject to
applicable regulatory permits prior to alteration. Given these
factors, staff has determined that the proposed IL zoning will not
result in any additional environmental impacts than would occur
with the existing CH zoning of the property.
Conclusion
The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area,
consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the
comprehensive plan, and meets all applicable concurrency criteria.
The subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for
industrial uses, and the request has met all applicable criteria.
For these reasons, staff supports the request.
15
.SAN 5 1993 8MK
^r 4
/ JAN .5199
T �
BOOK 88 FAG. • ,98
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
this request to rezone the subject property from CH to IL.
Attachments
1. Rezoning Application
2. Location Map
3. Approved minutes of the November 12, 1992 Planning and Zoning
Commission Meeting
4. Ordinance
79�W
Jr f V
N '. -
m I
C G _ a
4
R
• A
S.R. 60
rH 9 I
cr `O ' {
CG
m
A-1 A
TR.13
•Nlr slAl i. PAIIG � i
IMawmi � ,I
i� •o
I IL.
CH X
X
X
TO 4
F[ 1
Subject
Property
N
RMH-8
. R 7 RM -d
TR 5
RMH-8
Attachment 2
16
Direct -or Keating commented that this unusual in the sense that
the property is already platted and consists of 16 lots which abut
I-95. Two of the 16 lots.are already developed, and the rest are
vacant. The applicant is requesting a zoning change to give him
more flexibility in the types of usage allowed.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 93-1, amending the zoning ordinance and
the accompanying zoning map from CH to IL, for the
property generally located at the northwest corner
of 16th Street and 90th Avenue, as recommended by
staff.
ORDINANCE NO. 93-1
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM CH TO
IL, FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF 16TH STREET AND 90TH AVENUE, AND DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND
PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the
local planning agency on such matters, has held a public hearing
and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning
request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that
this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of
Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public
hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard;
17
JAN 5 1993 BOOK 88 Fair
JAN 5 '1993
BOOK 88 F-ar,E 400 -1
ORDINANCE NO. g3-1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning of
the following described property situated in Indian River County,
Florida, to -wit:
That part of Tract 16 lying East of Interstate -Route 95; less
the North 9.03 acres thereof; in Section 3, Township 33 South,
Range 38 East; according to the last general plat of lands of
the Indian River Farms Company Subdivision filed-Ih Plat Book
2, Page 25, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; said
lands now lying and being in Indian River County, Florida;
LESS AND EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE, THE EAST 40 FEET FOR ROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES.
Containing 20.88 acres, more or less, and being subject to
that certain right-of-way for road purposes, over, on and
above the South 30 feet of said Tract 16.
Be changed from CH to IL.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in
said Land Development Regulations.
Approved and adopted -by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, on this 5th day of January, 1993.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal
on the 11th day of December, 1992 -for a public hearing to be held
on the 5th day of January, 1993 at which time it was moved for
adoption by Commissioner Eggert , seconded by Commissioner
Tippin , and adopted by the following vote:
Comm. :arolyn K. Eggert - Aye
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin yA e
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: 16� � "4 ??�g e e—_ - 4 � �2
Richard N. Bird Chairman
4—
ATTEST BY:
OY f�.� K.Urton
lug& lr'�' .
Acknowledgement by the Department of State of the State of Florida
this 13th day of JaNUARY • 1993.
Effective Date: Acknowledgement from the Department of State
received on this 19th day of January , 1993, at 10:00
A.M./RxN. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board_ of
County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida.
18
PUBLIC HEARING — COLLEY REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRES
FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Attorney Vitunac announced that the Public Hearing had been
properly advertised as follows:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press -Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, .Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a _�/i -IP
In the matter
In the Court, was pub-
lished in said newspaper in the issues of aVel,'*W-
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press•Joumal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and hasbeen
entered as second class mail matter at the post office In Vero Beach, in said Indian River bee
o
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached cpy of
oun-
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. ''
Sworn to and subscribed befo me is ay oja4l .19
_.(Bulliness Manager)
(SEAL)
1"'" r rlddir, :.,. �. q- .r r.,
19
WOTIC.E - RISK flEARM
"" or tmd Of heafft to coilsklar �adLope°" oUght f
duONe �D19b to Co ral Dftict.
CC,oeey. The " y awned by violet
at the north.
0.88 a The COW Rdroad Tauboct arxi soot inSoutli
west 114 eeatiorr of 5ectiorr Township 325,
Ra ae �. OV and being h � RKw Canty,
dire t Zieve hawkV at which in htwM and
apporhadty to be heard, wi
be held by the Board of CarMft* rare of
cion Charnbers of the Cmffdy AdrWison &dd-
ft located at 1840 251h Street, Vero Beach, Ftor-
T/e t ofd 5,1983, at 9:05 a.m.
enottrar zoning � nray edt
4u�d, provided It b wft* the earn" gden�etrrlaelt use
Myope who may wish to appeal cry decision
which may be made at ft meeteg vMB 1�eed ta.eo-
sure IM a verbatim record of thepoceedirlp e
made, which erohrdes the testimony .and e+
4W which
q)PBW will be t
N"M who o a special acconanodatbn far
With Americaria
(ADA) ( c arm et
Wrieration 408 at least 48 ban in Onnoe of `
Indlen River s
Board of &Cx ty�
gj
D= ,,, i982s411t4" K Eggert Chairman .
957%41 .
BOOK 8O pr) F 41; 1
BOOK
�
JAN 51
Director Keating made the following presentation:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEP TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. eat g,
Community Developmea Director
THRU: Sasan Rohani
Chief, Long- ge Planning
FROM: John Wachtel
Staff Plann , Long -Range Planning
DATE: November 25, 1992
88 Pvr 4102
RE: VIOLET COLLEY REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.85 ACRES
FROM IL TO CG (RZON 92-06-0140)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of January 5, 1993.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This is a request to rezone approximately 0.85 acres from IL, Light
Industrial District, to CG, General Commercial District. Located
at the northwest corner of 45th Street and the Florida East Coast
Railroad Tracks, the subject property consists of two adjacent
lots, both owned by Violet Colley. The purpose of this request is
to secure the necessary zoning to develop the site with retail and
multiple -family residential uses.
On November 12, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5 to
0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this
request to rezone the subject property to CG.
Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject property is zoned IL, Light Industrial District. One
non -conforming single-family home exists on each lot. The home on
the eastern lot is vacant, while the home on the western lot is
temporarily occupied. The land to the east, north, and west of the
subject property is also zoned IL. The Florida East Coast Railroad
abuts the subject property on the east, and the Dole Fruit Packers
Plant borders the subject property on the north and west. To the
south, across 45th Street, is the Hillcrest Subdivision, zoned RM -
10, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 10 units/acre).
Directly across 45th Street from the subject property is a non-
conforming fruit stand operating on an otherwise vacant lot. West
of the fruit stand is a church.
Future Land Use Pattern
The subject
Industrial
east, and v
property is currently designated C/I, Commercial/
on the future land use map. Properties to -the north,
rest are also currently designated C/I. Land to the
20
south is designated M-2, Medium -Density Residential on the future
land use map. The M-2 designation permits residential uses with a
density up to 10 units/acre.
Environment
The subject property's natural condition was altered with the
construction of the existing single-family homes on the site. No
wetlands or -native upland plant communities exist on site. There
are, however, a number of protected pine trees on the property, and
these trees are subject to county tree protection ordinance
criteria.
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county.
Wastewater lines extend to the site from the Central County
(Gifford) Wastewater Plant. The South County Water Plant provides
potable water to the site.
Transportation System
The property has access to 45th Street. Forty-fifth Street is
classified as a collector roadway on the future roadway
thoroughfare plan map. This segment of 45th Street is a 2 -lane
paved road with approximately 70 feet of existing public road
right-of-way. It is programmed for expansion to 80 feet of public
road right-of-way by 2010.
Zoninq District Differences
As noted in the county's land development regulations, the IL
zoning district is intended to accommodate employment centers as
well as limited manufacturing and industrial activities. The CG
zoning district, however, is oriented to less intense uses.
According to county regulations, the CG district is programmed to
accommodate general retail sales and selected service activities.
The difference between the IL and CG zoning districts is best
illustrated by the respective purpose statements of each of the two
districts. These purpose statements are as follows:
• IL, Light Industrial District, is intended to provide
opportunities for limited manufacturing and industrial uses
and to promote the establishment of employment centers which
are accessible to urban services and facilities, the area
labor force, and local industrial and business markets while
minimizing the potential for any adverse impacts upon nearby
properties.
• CG, General Commercial District, is intended to provide areas
for the development of general retail sales and selected
service_ activities. The --CG district is not intended to
provide for heavy commercial activities, such as commercial
service uses, heavy repair services nor industrial uses.
ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the
application will be presented. The analysis will include a
description of:
• concurrency of public facilities;
• compatibility with the surrounding area;
• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
• potential impact on environmental quality.
21
LJAN1993 9aaK 88 F,aGF 403
JAN
r
BOOK 88 PnUE404
Concurrency of Public Facilities
This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area
deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan
establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use
Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary
to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community.
The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be
reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these
services and facilities are maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land- Use Element steres that no
development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the
concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is
required.
As per section 910.07 of the County's Land Development Regulations,
conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of
each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning
requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the
subject property based upon the requested zoning district. For
commercial rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to
the county's LDR's) is retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of
gross floor area per acre of land proposed for rezoning. The site
information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Property: ±0.85 acres
2. Size of Area to be Rezoned: ±0.85 acres
3. Existing Zoning Classification: IL, Light Industrial
4. Existing Land Use Designation: C/ I, Commercial/
Industrial
5. Proposed Zoning Classification: CG, General Commercial
6. Most Intense Use under Proposed Zoning Classification:
±81500 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in
the 5th Edition ITE Manual).
As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of
the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not
increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency
requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency
review because the requested zoning would not increase the use
intensity of the site.
By changing the zoning of the subject property from IL to CG,
various uses not currently allowed will be permitted on the site.
However, because the most intense use of the property would be the
same with either zoning district, changing the property's zoning
from IL to CG will not create additional impacts on any concurrency
facilities.
When new development is proposed
detailed concurrency analysis
development approval process.
l
22
for the subject property, a more
will be conducted -:during the
r
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
It is staff's position that the proposed rezoning will not create
any -compatibility problems with the surrounding areas. The
principal impacts of development of this site will be on the
residential --area across 45th Street, to the south. Since the
requested CG zoning district, however, is a less intense land use
than the current IL -zoning, the zoning change would not increase
the impacts on the adjacent residential area.
As indicated by the applicant, the -purpose of. -this- request is to
develop the site with a two-story b'hilding--retail on the first
floor, and apartments above. Since most retail uses are prohibited
within IL zoning districts, the applicant could not proceed with
his plan under the site's existing zoning. His proposed use,
however, would be permitted within the CG zoning district.
Apartments are allowed as administrative permit uses within the CG
zoning district, while they are not allowed within IL zoning
districts.
Generally, CG zoning districts are appropriately located where they
are easily accessible to the general public, as is the subject
property. While accessibility should not be justification for
creating a strip development pattern along the entire frontage of
major roads, accessibility should be a consideration in the
relative location of various types of commercial zoning districts
within an overall commercial/industrial node area. In this case,
the property is not only accessible because of its 45th Street
firontage, but its location within a commercial/industrial node
precludes establishment of a strip pattern. Therefore, it is
staff's opinion that the requested CG zoning district is
appropriate for the subject property and is compatible with
surrounding areas.
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of
the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the
overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use
Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation,
conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their
densities. -Commercial and industrial land uses are located in
nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of
the Comprehensive Plan. Policies are statements in the plan which
identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct
the community's development. As courses of action committed to by
the county, policies provide the basis for all county land
development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are
important,,.Aome have more applivability than others in reviewing
rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request
are Future Land Use Policy 1.15, Future Land Use Objective 5,
Housing Objective 1, Economic Development Objective B. and Economic
Development Policy 8.1.
- Future Land Use Policy 1.15
Future Land Use Policy 1.15 states that the commercial land use
designation is intended for uses such as retail and wholesale
trade, offices, business and _personal services, residential
treatment centers, limited residential uses, and other similar type
uses. In addition, that policy states that all commercial uses
must be located within an existing or future urban service area.
23
A 9 0 ,r9
JAN 51993
SOUK 88 F,,�,H 406 -7
Since the subject property is located within a commercial/
industrial node within the county's urban service area, the request
is consistent with Future Land Use Policy 1.15.
- Future Land Use Objective 5
Future Land Use Objective 5 states that the county will provide for
a mix of land uses which permit and encourage a variety of
development patterns to accommodate a diversity of lifestyles.
Considering the applicant's plans for the site, granting this
request would encourage a diversity of development in this portion
of the county. Therefore, the requested zoning is consistent with
Future Land -Use Objective 5.
- Housing Objective 1, Economic Development Objective 8, and
Economic Development Policy 8.1
Housing Objective 1 and Economic Development Objective 8 state that
the county shall reduce the cost of housing and ensure that it is
adequate, affordable, and available to all county residents,
including the 60% of county households in the very low, low, and
moderate income groups. Economic Development Policy 8.1 states
that the county shall create incentives to encourage the provision
of affordable housing. Since the applicant intends to develop the
site with housing, in conjunction with retail, the cost of
providing and maintaining the housing may be reduced. Therefore,
the rezoning request implements Housing Objective 1, Economic
Development Objective 8, and Economic Development Policy 8.1.
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
It is staff's position that the requested zoning change will not
negatively impact the environmental quality of this previously
disturbed site. Since the property is less than one acre in size,
county native upland preservation regulations do not apply. Given
the disturbed nature of the site, however, this lack of
applicability is insignificant. Based upon its analysis, staff has
determined that the environmental impacts of development of the
subject property will be the same under either the current IL
zoning or the requested CG zoning.
Conclusion
The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area,
consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the
comprehensive plan, and meets all applicable concurrency criteria.
The subject property is located in an area deemed suitable for
commercial.uses, and the request has met all applicable criteria.
Staff supports the request.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
this request to rezone the subject property from IL to CG.
24
Chairman Bird opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Lonnie Powell, Dole Citrus, reported that Dole owns the
property north of the subject property, and for two years Dole has
been trying to get Public Works to deal with the drainage problem.
Commissioner Eggert commented that the drainage problem will
be dealt with as part of the contract for the last phase of Indian
River Boulevard.
Mr. Powell asked whether the drainage problem will be
addressed before any construction can be done on the subject
property.
Director Keating explained that a site plan would be required
to include retention of a certain amount of the runoff on site as
well as compensate for off-site runoff.
Ralph Lundy, Gifford Community Leader, just wanted to express
his community's appreciation of Commissioner Eggert's support while
she was Chairman of the Board. He congratulated the new Board
members and wished them a peaceful, prosperous, and productive
year. He expressed his desire to see the image of Gifford change
and emphasized that the area certainly needs improvement. He
emphasized that 45th Street is one of the most important streets in
the area and how important it is to develop the area for business,
not only for the residents but for the entire County. He envisions
having a County facility there for people to take care of their tax
bills and possibly a medical clinic if something could be worked
out with Indian River Memorial Hospital. He concluded that the
person making the rezoning request is a successful businesswoman
and he endorses her request.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted*
Ordinance 93-2, amending the zoning ordinance and
tha 4c-companying zoning neap from IL to CG, for the
property generally located at the northwest corner
of 45th Street and the Florida East Coast RR tracks,
as recommended by staff.
25
JAN 5 1993 Boa 88 FA u* 4 7
r JAN
5 1993
0
ORDINANCE NO. 93_2
BOOK 88 P,A11' 08 -7
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM IL TO
CG, FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF 45TH STREET AND THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD TRACKS, AND
DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the -Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the
local planning agency on such matters,_ has held a__public hearing
and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning
request; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that
this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of
Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public
hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning of
the following described property situated in Indian River County,
Florida, to -wit:
Beginning on the south line of the Southwest j of section 23,
Township 32 South, Range 39 East, and at the west boundary of
the Florida East Coast Railway right-of-way, Thence West 225
feet, thence North 225 feet, thence East to the right-of-way
of the Florida East Coast railway, thence Southerly along the
west side of the Florida East Coast railway right-of-way, to
the point of beginning. Less and except the North 10 feet of
the South 35 feet. Indian River County, Florida.
Be changed from IL to CG.
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in
said Land Development Regulations.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, on this 5th day of January, 1993.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal
on the 11th day of. December, 1992 for a public hearing to be held
26
ORDINANCE NO. 93_2
on the 5th day of January, 1993 at which time it was moved for
adoption by Commissioner Eggert , seconded by Commissioner
Ti ppi n , and adopted by the following vote:
Comm. . Carolyn K. Eggert Ave
Commi ssi over - - Richard N. Bird Ave
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Ave
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Ave
Commissioner John W. Tippin Ave
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
c
BY:
Rich rd N. Bird Chairman
ATTEST BY: .y - �•` , �.
e Cgry K. Baton, /GlerkY!tV
�.�
Acknowledgement by the Department of State of the State
taa of •Florida
this 13th day of January. 1993•
Effective Date: Acknowledgement from the Department of State
received on this 19th day of January , 1993, at 10:00
A.M./Pys*k and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
LA -1 -
William .
William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney
Obert M. KeaC4hg,,,�P
Community Developdu3,ht Director
u\v\j\COLLEY.ORD
_ $1,3k
r Ca AipvDved
Date
(v C- (2 . �.j'�j
Dept.
gr.
27
J A N 5 199 �dn+P41
�
/ JAN
J
BOOK 88 PAGE 4107
PUBLIC BEARING - BENSICX REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 39.58
ACRES FROM A-1, AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, TO RS -3, SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Attorney Vitunac advised that the public hearing had been
advertised as follows:
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
. Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press•Joumal, a -daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
a ,
In the matter of i
In the . Court, was pub-
lished In said newspaper In the Issues ofj�
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press•Joumal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, In said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office In -Vero Beach, in said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund forte purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication In the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of ,6, 19
(SEAL)
28
Manager)
i
ffi
p
NOTICE • MOX NEARM r
Notoe of hewfrp to ta>tWft tte adoptbn of a
WGn I WW hone A•1,
SkVWF" rp�r�
b paujbiea� p y am ha .
located an the nod side of 41h EiUm b
0 43rd Avmw and 50 Avow and aonW o alp-
oraodmatdv 3958 ears. The subject property Ms .
Inn 11ro Naanr . v4 asetlon of sedimn 18, Tat .
ddp 33S• RoW 39E. Mag end Will In rdlen
V
•p '9 at which partba h In mm- and
!`
14= have an opport rdly m be heard, w•
be held by the Board of Qomnhbelorhea
M Cmity. FFbrlds b firs canny curb.
hg, boated at 1840 25 Stu "K VeroBeak'
Ida, on Tuesday. Jara y 5.1993. at 9:05 a m. ' . ,
NOW ��hIIrhppadeh�td, � a� i
( quested. provided t b wdhh the arra q mrd tar l
Anyow � M �. to appset `
e which may be meds at Baa mes qIY wl naneeddeto ari. .
' a n no a vwbatrn reoa I of the �b ;
meds, which hordes the tatYnorh am
upon which the apped b baed.
spnial�b FINOp oodetthe uotenb
Whh Dba 8tb la Aa (ADI) Coo dbu tar at 567 -BOM
I extensluh 409 at ball 48 hers h advance of
DM4ffoly11,1992 n
K. Eon Chairman
Deo '
957824 ,
ITI 1-1
JIFSubject
:�.,:.+
' Property
N
4th ST "A ..
ffi
p
NOTICE • MOX NEARM r
Notoe of hewfrp to ta>tWft tte adoptbn of a
WGn I WW hone A•1,
SkVWF" rp�r�
b paujbiea� p y am ha .
located an the nod side of 41h EiUm b
0 43rd Avmw and 50 Avow and aonW o alp-
oraodmatdv 3958 ears. The subject property Ms .
Inn 11ro Naanr . v4 asetlon of sedimn 18, Tat .
ddp 33S• RoW 39E. Mag end Will In rdlen
V
•p '9 at which partba h In mm- and
!`
14= have an opport rdly m be heard, w•
be held by the Board of Qomnhbelorhea
M Cmity. FFbrlds b firs canny curb.
hg, boated at 1840 25 Stu "K VeroBeak'
Ida, on Tuesday. Jara y 5.1993. at 9:05 a m. ' . ,
NOW ��hIIrhppadeh�td, � a� i
( quested. provided t b wdhh the arra q mrd tar l
Anyow � M �. to appset `
e which may be meds at Baa mes qIY wl naneeddeto ari. .
' a n no a vwbatrn reoa I of the �b ;
meds, which hordes the tatYnorh am
upon which the apped b baed.
spnial�b FINOp oodetthe uotenb
Whh Dba 8tb la Aa (ADI) Coo dbu tar at 567 -BOM
I extensluh 409 at ball 48 hers h advance of
DM4ffoly11,1992 n
K. Eon Chairman
Deo '
957824 ,
Director Keating presented the following memo dated November
25, 1992:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE
Robert M. Keat n , A
THRU: Sasan Rohani S -%L .
Chief, Long -Range Planning
FROM: John Wachtel
Staff Plann9f, Long -Range Planning
DATE: November 25, 1992
RE: Wm. Hensick & Sons, Inc. Request to Rezone Approximately
39.58 acres from A-1 to RS -3 (RZON 92-09-0110)
It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal
consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at their regular
meeting of January 5, 1993.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
This is a request to rezone approximately 39.58 acres. The subject
property is located on the north side of 4th Street between 43rd
Avenue and 58th Avenue and is owned by Wm. Hensick & Sons, Inc.
The request involves rezoning the property from A-11 Agricultural
District (up to 1 unit/5 acres) to RS -3, Single -Family Residential
District (up to 3 units/acre). The purpose of this request is to
secure the. zoning necessary for developing the property with
single-family residential uses.
On November 12, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0
to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this
request to rezone the subject property to RS -3.
Existing Land Use Pattern
The subject property and property to the north, south, and west are
zoned A-11 Agricultural District. The property to the east is
zoned RS -31 Single -Family Residential District, and is under the
same ownersfrip as the subject property. The subject property and
properties to the south, east, and west are currently used almost
exclusively for groves. The east half of the area north of the
subject property is an approximately 16 acre tract. This tract is
mostly uncleared and contains one single-family home. The west
half of the area north of the subject property. is also a large,
mostly uncleared tract. This tract contains a grove maintenance
facility.
Future Land Use Pattern
The subject property and all surrounding land is designated L-1,
Low -Density Residential, on the county future land use map. The L-
1 designation permits residential densities up to three units/acre.
29
JAN 5 1993 BOOK 88 mu' 11
Fr'_
JAN 5 '199.1
Environment
-7
,�
BOOK 88 u .. 412'
The subject property is currently used for agricultural purposes,
being a citrus grove. No wetlands or native upland plant
communities exist on site. The subject property is within an "AE"
100 year floodplain, with a ' minimum base flood elevation
requirement of 22 feet NGVD.
Utilities and Services
The site is within the Urban Service Area of the county. At the
present time, neither water nor wastewater lines extend to the
site.
Transportation System
The property abuts 4th Street which is classified as an urban minor
arterial road on the future roadway thoroughfare plan map. This
segment of 4th Street is a two-lane paved road with approximately
30 feet of existing public road right-of-way. It is programmed for
expansion to 80 feet of public road right-of-way by 2010.
ANALYSIS
In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the
application will be presented. The analysis will include a
description of:
• concurrency of public facilities;
• compatibility with the surrounding area;
• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and
• potential impact on environmental quality.
Concurrency of Public Facilities
This site is.located within the county Urban Service Area, an area
deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan
establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water,
Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use
Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary
to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community.
The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations also
require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum
acceptable standards for these services and facilities are
maintained.
Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no
development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the
concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements
Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is
required.
Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of
each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning
requests are not projects, county regulations call for the
concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the
subject property based upon the requested zoning district. The
site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows:
1. Size of Property: ±39.58 acres
2. Size of Area to be Rezoned: ±39.58 acres -_
3. Existing Zoning Classification:
30
A-1, Agricultural
District (up to 1 unit/5
acres)
M
4. Proposed Zoning Classification:
5. Most Intense Use of Subject
Property under Existing
Zoning. -Classification:
6. Most Intense Use of Subject
Property under Proposed
Zoning Classification:
- Transportation
RS -3, Single -Family
Residential District (up
to 3 units/acre)
8 units
118 units
A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the
development of the property indicates that the existing level of
service "D" or better on 4th Street would not be lowered. The site
information used for determining traffic is as follows:
Existing Zoning District
1. Residential Use Identified in 5th Edition ITE Manual: Single -
Family
2. For Single -Family Units, in ITE Manual:
a. Average Weekday Trip Ends: 9.55/unit
b. P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends: 1.01/unit
C. Inbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 65%
d. Outbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 35%
3. Formula for Determining Number of Peak Hour/Peak Season/Peak
Direction Trips. Generated: Number of Units X P.M. Peak Hour
Rate.X Inbound P.M. Percentage (8 X 1.01 X .65 = 5)
4. Formula for Determining Number of Average Weekday Trips
Generated: Number of Units X Average Weekday Rate
(8 X 9.55 = 76)
Proposed Zoning District
1. Residential Use Identified in 5th Edition ITE Manual:
Single -Family
2. For Single -Family Units, in ITE Manual:
a. Average Weekday Trip Ends: 9.55/unit
b. P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends: 1.01/unit
C. Inbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 65%
d. Outbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 35%
3. Formula for Determining Number of Peak Hour/Peak Season/Peak
Direction Trips Generated: Number of Units X P.M. Peak Hour
Rate X__ -Inbound P.M. Percentage (118 X 1.01 X .65-= 77)
(trip distribution based on a Modified Gravity Model)
4. Formula for Determining Number of Average Weekday Trips
Generated: Number of Units X Average Weekday Rate
(118 X 9.55 = 1,127)
5. Peak Direction of 4th Street, from 43rd Avenue to 58th Avenue:
Westbound
6. Traffic Capacity on this segment of 4th Street, at a Level of
Service "D": 630 peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips
7. Existing Traffic volume on this segment of 4th Street:
103 peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips
31
JAN 51993 BOOK
I
JAN 1993 �ooK 88 Pn 414
The number of Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most
intense use of the subject property under the existing zoning
3 district is 76. This was determined by multiplying the 8 units
(most intense use), by ITE's single-family residential factor of
9.55 Average Daily Trip Ends/unit.
The number of Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most
intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning
district is 1,127. This was determined by multiplying the 118
units (most intense use), by ITE's single-family residential factor
Of 9.55 Average Daily Trip Ends/unit.
Since the county's transportation level of service is based on peak
hour/peak season/peak direction characteristics, the transportation
concurrency analysis addresses project traffic occurring in the
peak hour and affecting the peak direction of impacted roadways.
According to ITE, the proposed use. generates more volume in the
p.m. peak hour than in the a.m: peak hour. Theref6=e, the p.m.
peak hour was used in the transportation concurrency analysis. The
peak direction during the p.m. peak hour on 4th Street is
westbound.
Given those conditions, the number of peak hour/peak season/peak
direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of
the subject property under the existing zoning district was
calculated to be 5. This was determined by multiplying the total
number of units allowed (8) under the existing zoning by ITE's
factor of 1.01 p.m. peak hour trips/unit, then taking 65% of that
total to ensure that only inbound trips were counted.
To determine the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction
trips that would be generated by the most intense use of the
subject property under the proposed zoning district, the total
number of units allowed (118) under the proposed zoning was
multiplied by ITE's factor of 1.01 p.m. peak hour trips/unit; that
volume was then multiplied by the inbound trip factor of 0.65. The
result was 77, or 72 more than the 5 that would be generated by the
most intense use of the subject property under the existing zoning.
Using a modified gravity model and a hand assignment, the trips
generated by.the proposed use were then assigned to roadways on the
network.
Capacities for all roadway segments in Indian River County are
calculated and updated annually,_ utilizing the latest and best
available peak season traffic characteristics and applying Appendix
G methodology as set forth in the Florida Department of
Transportation Level of Service Manual. Available capacity is the
total capacity less existing and committed traffic volumes; this is
updated daily based upon vesting associated with project approvals.
The traffic capacity for the segment of 4th Street adjacent to this
site is 630 trips (peak hour/peak season/peak direction) at a Level
of Service "D", while the existing traffic volume on this segment
of 4th Street is 103 trips (peak hour/peak season/peak direction).
The additional 77 peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips
created by the most intense use of the subject property under the
proposed zoning classification will increase the total peak
hour/peak season/peak direction trips for this segment of 4th
Street to approximately 180.
Based on staff analysis, it was determined that 4th Street and all
other impacted roads can accommodate the additional trips without
decreasing their existing levels of service. Impacted roads are
defined in the county's Land Development Regulations_ as roadway
segments which receive five percent (5%) or more daily project
traffic or fifty (50) or more daily project trips, whichever is
less.
The table below identifies each of the impacted roadway segments
associated with this proposed zoning classification. As indicated
32
in this table, there is* suf f icient capacity in all of the segments
to accommodate the projected traffic associated with the request.
33
L -JAN 5 1993 BOOK 8olu 41!
_ TRAFFIC.CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION
Impacted Road Segments
(peak hour/peak season/peak
direction)
segment
Roadway
capacity
Segment
Road
From
TO
g "Dn
1310
O.S. 1
Oslo Road
4th Street
2,220
1315
O.S. 1
4th Street
8th Street
2,270
1320
O.S. 1
8th Street
12th Street
2,270
1325
O.S. 1
12th Street
S. VB Cty Lim.
2,370
1330
O.S. 1
S. VB Cty Lim.
17th Street
2,270
1335
O.S. 1
17th Stmt
S.R. 60
2,270
1340
O.S. 1
S.R. 60
Royal Palm Blvd.
2,300
1920
S.R. 60
82nd Avenue
66th Avenue
1,760
1925
S.R. 60
66th Avenue
58th Avenue
1,760
1930
S.R. 60
58th Avenue
43rd Avenue
2,650
1935
S.R. 60
43rd Avenue
27th Avenue
2,650
1940
S.R. 60
27th Avenue
20th Avenue
2,600
1945
S.R. 60
20th Avenue
Old Dixie Hwy.
1,638
1950
S.R. 60
Old Dixie Hwy.
10th Avenue
1,638
1955
S.R. 60
10th Avenue
O.S. 1
1,638
2810
20th Avenue
Oslo Road
4th Street
630
2820
20th Avenue
4th Street
8th Street
630
2830
20th Avenue
8th Street
12th Street
630
2840
20th Avenue
12th Street
S. VB Cty Lim.
1,760
2850
20th Avenue
S. VB Cty Lim.
16th Street
1,760
2860
20th Avenue
16th Street
S.R. 60
1,760
2905
43rd Avenue
S. County Line
Oslo Road
630
2910
43rd Avenue
Oslo Road
4th Street
630
2915
43rd Avenue
4th Street
8th Street
630
2920
43rd Avenue
8th Street
12th Street
630
2925
43rd Avenue
12th Street
16th Street
830
2930
43rd Avenue
16th Street
S.R. 60
830
2935
43rd Avenue
S.R. 60
26th Street
830
2940
43rd Avenue
26th Street
41st Street
630
3005
58th Avenue
Oslo Road
4th Street
630
3010
58th Avenue
4th Street
8th Street
630
3015
58th Avenue
8th Street
12th Street
630
3020
58th Avenue
12th Street
16th Street
630
3025
58th Avenue
16th Street
S.R. 60
830
3030
58th Avenue
S.R. 60
41st Street
830
3035
58th Avenue
41st Street
45th Street
630
3040
58th Avenue
45th Street
49th Street
630
4910
4th Street
82nd Avenue
58th Avenue
630
4930
4th Street
58th Avenue
43rd Avenue
630
4940
4th Street
43rd Avenue
27th Avenue
630
4950
4th Street
27th Avenue
20th Avenue
630
4960
4th Street
20th Avenue
Old Dixie Hwy.
630
4970
4th Street
Old Dixie Hwy.
O.S. 1
630
Existing Demand
Total Available
Positive
Roadway
Existing Vested
Segment Segment
Project Concurrency
Segment
Volume Volume
Demand Capacity
Demand Determination
1310
1526 43
1569
651
5
Y
1315
1526 42
1568
702
5
Y
1320
1526 44
1570
700
3
Y
1325
1526 58
1584
786
2
Y
1330
13AI 57
1398
872
2
Y
1335
1341 56
1397
873
2
Y
1340
1143 57
1200
1100
1
Y
1920
950 55
1005
755
3
Y
1925
972 59
1031
729
6
Y
1930
972 110
1082
1568
3
Y
1935
612 73
685
1965
2
Y
1940
878 51
929
1671
- 1
Y
1945
747 41
788
850
4
Y
1950
747 33
780
858
6
Y
1955
747 31
778
860
3
Y
2810
144 56
200
430
2
Y
2820
274 18
292
338
8
Y
2830
310 10
320
310
4
Y
2840
297 4
301
1459
3
Y
2850
297 5
302
1458
3
Y
2860
265 6
271
1489
2
Y
2905
135 12
147
483
5
Y
33
L -JAN 5 1993 BOOK 8olu 41!
YY".�jj
JAN 5 �9e,9,3
Boa 88 pnt-416
Roadway
Segment
Existing
Sx st ng
Volume
Demand
Vested
Volume
Total
Segment
Demand
Available
Segment
Capacity
Project
Demand
Positive
Concurrency
Determination
2910
225
34
259
371
10
Y
2915
360
17
377
253
10
Y
2920
454
14
468
162
8
Y
2925
454
17
471 _
359
5
Y
2930
373
25
398
432
5
Y
2935
373
31
404
426
4
Y
2940
283
27
310
320
2
Y
3005
144
5
149
481
10
Y
3010
144
6
150
480
25
Y
3015
144
9
153
477
15
Y
3020
144
10
154
476
15
Y
3025
400
21
421
409
12
Y
3030
414
31
445
385
5
Y
3035
414
20
434
196
3
Y
3040
414
16
430
200
1
Y
4910
103
6
109
.521
6
Y
4930
103
6
109 —
521
41 "
Y
4940
216
17
233
397
50
Y
4950
315 -
23
338
292
30
Y
4960
315
26
341
289
20
Y
4970
450
14
464
166
10
Y
Water
The site is within the urban service area; however, water lines do
not extend to the site at this time. The applicant has signed a
developer's agreement with the county which states that the
developer agrees to connect to the county water system at the time
of development.
Using the subject property for 118 residential units will result in
water consumption at a rate of 118 Equivalent Residential Units
(ERU), or 29,500 gallons/day. This is based upon a level of
service of 250 gallons/ERU/day. When the subject property connects
to county lines, it will be serviced by the South County Water
Plant. This plant has a remaining capacity of approximately
2,400,000 gallons/day and can accommodate the additional demand
generated by the proposed amendment.
- Wastewater
Wastewater lines do not extend to the site at this time. The
applicant, however, has signed a developer's agreement with the
county which states that the developer agrees to connect to the
county wastewater system at the time of development.
When the subject property connects to county lines, it will be
serviced by the West County Wastewater Plant. Based upon the most
intense use allowed under the proposed amendment, development of
the property will have a wastewater generation rate of
approximately 118 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU), or 29,500
gallons/day. This is based upon the level of service standard of
250 gallons/ERU/day. The West County Wastewater Plant currently
has a remaining capacity of more than 506,000 gallons/day and can
accommodate the additional wastewater generated by the proposed
amendment.
- Solid Waste
Solid waste. service includes pick-up by private operators and
disposal at the county landfill. Solid waste generation by a 118
unit residential development on the subject site will be
approximately 189 Waste Generation Units (WGU) or 560 cubic yards
Of solid waste/year. A WGU is a Waste Generation Unit. -measurement
equivalent to 2.9625 cubic yards of waste/year.
According to the county's solid waste regulations, each residential
unit generates 1.6 WGU/unit. With the county's adopted level of
service standard of 2.37 cubic yards/person/year and the county's
average of 2 persons/unit, each WGU is equivalent to 1.25 people
34
� � r
(2/1.6 = 1.25) and 2.9625 cubic yards of solid waste/year (1.25 X
2.37). To calculate the total cubic yards of solid waste for the
most intense use allowed on the subject property under the proposed
zoning district, staff utilized the following formula: Total number
of WGUs X 3.25 X 2.37 (189 X 1.25 X 2.37 = 560 cubic yards/year).
A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the
county landfill indicates the availability of.more than 900,000
cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 3 year
capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010.
Based on staff analysis, it was determined that the county landfill
can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site
under the proposed zoning.
- Drainage
All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater
regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of
floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In
addition, development proposals must meet the discharge
requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance. The
subject property is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin. Since
the site is located within the Indian River Farms Water Control
District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited
from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-
four hour period, which is the approved IRFWCD discharge rate. .
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standard
applies, since the property lies within a floodplain. Consistent
with Drainage Policy 1.2, "all new buildings shall have the lowest
habitable floor elevation no lower than the elevation of the 100 -
year flood elevation as shown on the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map, or as defined in a more detailed
study report." Since the subject property lies within Flood Zone
AE, which is a special flood hazard area located within the 100 -
year floodplain, any development on this property must have a
minimum finished floor elevation. of no less than 22 feet above mean
sea level.
Besides the minimum elevation requirement, on-site retention and
discharge standards also apply to this request. With the most
intense use of this site, the maximum area of impervious surface
under the proposed zoning classification will be approximately
1,034,463 square feet, or 23.74 acres. The maximum runoff volume,
based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour
design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement,
will be approximately 1,200,000 cubic feet. In order to maintain
the county's adopted level of service, the applicant will be
required to retain approximately 876,000 cubic feet of runoff on-
site. With the soil characteristics of the subject property, it is
estimated that the pre -development runoff rate is 36.6 cubic
feet/second.
Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level of service
standards will be met by limiting off-site discharge to the
IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours,
requiring retention of the 876,000 cubic feet of runoff for the
most intense use of the property, and requiring that all finished
floor elevations exceed 22 feet above mean sea level.
As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted
during the development approval process.
- Recreation
A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand
that would result from the most intense development that could
occur on the property under the proposed zoning classification
indicates that the adopted levels of service would be maintained.
The table below illustrates the additional park demand associated
35
L_JAN 5 1993 bd®K 88
JA N 19 �� BOOK 88 FacF 4181
with the proposed development of the property and the existing
surplus acreage by park type.
LOS Project
(Acres per. Demand Surplus
Park Type 1000 population) Acres Acreage
Urban District 5.0 1.18 211.477
Community (south)_ 1.25 0.29 12.309
Beach 1.5 0.35 73.843
River 1.5 0.35 34.840
The concurrency requirements for drainage, roads, solid waste,
water, wastewater, and parks have been met for the proposed
rezoning. Based upon its analysis, staff has determi�d that there
is adequate public facilities capacity to serve the most intense
use allowed under the proposed rezoning. For that reason, staff
has issued a conditional concurrency certificate to the applicant._
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of
the comprehensive plan. Rezoning requests must also be consistent
with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future
Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential,
recreational, conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses
and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are
located in nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian
River County.
The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of
the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which
identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct
the community's development. As courses of action committed to by
the county, policies provide the basis for all county land
development related decisions. While all comprehensive plan
policies are important, some have more applicability than others in
reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this
request is Future Land Use Policy 1.11.
- Future Land Use Policy 1.11
Future Land Use Policy 1.11 states that the L-1, Low -Density
Residential - 1 land use designation is intended for residential
uses up to 3 units/acre. In addition, that policy states that
these residential uses must be located within an existing or future
urban service area.
Since the subject property is located within an area designated as
L-1 on the county's future land use plan map and is located within
the county's urban service area and the applicant proposes to
develop the property with residential uses no higher than 3 units/
acre, the proposed request is consistent with Policy 1.11.
While policy 1.11 is particularly applicable to this request, other
comprehensive plan policies also have relevance. For that reason,
staff evaluated the subject request for consistency with all plan
policies. Based upon that analysis, staff determined that the
request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. ,
Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
It is staff's position that granting
subject property to RS -3 will result.i
n
36
the request to rezone the
development which will be
- M M
compatible with surrounding areas. The subject property is
bordered -by groves on three sides, and by mostly uncleared land.on
the north side. The subject property is large enough to buffer
itself from the -adjacent agricultural uses (as required in section
911.04(3)(c)5b of the County LDRs). Based on the analysis
performed,: Staff feels that the requested RS -3 zoning would be
compatible with the surrounding area..
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality
In light of county drainage, solid waste, and wastewater hookup
requirements, the proposed rezoning would have minimal adverse
impacts on site environmental quality.
Conclusion
The requested zoning is compatible with the surrounding area,
consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency
criteria, and will have no negative impacts on environmental
quality. The subject property is located in an area deemed suited
for low density residential uses and meets all applicable rezoning
criteria. For these reasons, staff supports the request to rezone
the subject property from A-1 to RS -3.
Recommendation
Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject
property from A-1 to RS -3.
Chairman Bird opened the public hearing, and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter.
Norman Rensick, owner of the subject property, advised that he
would be happy to answer any questions the Board may have.
It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously adopted
Ordinance 93-3, amending the zoning ordinance and
the accompanying zoning map from A-1 to RS -3,- for
the property generally located on the north side of
4th Street between 43rd Avenue and 58th Avenue, as
recommended by staff.
37
C
JAN 5 1993,®oo F'acF 1�
r-�i
JAN 19
J
BOOK 88 FA;E 4ZO-7
ORDINANCE NO. -93-3
AN ORDINANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM A-1 TO
RS -3, FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
4TH STREET BETWEEN 43RD AVENUE AND 58TH AVENUE, AND DESCRIBED
HEREIN, AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, sitting as the
local planning agency on such matters, has held a_public hearing
and subsequently made a recommendation regarding this rezoning
request; and -
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County, Florida, did publish and send its Notice of Intent to
rezone the hereinafter described property; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that
this rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of
Indian River County; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has held a public
hearing pursuant to this rezoning request, at which parties in
interest and citizens were heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County
Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida, that the Zoning of
the following described property situated in Indian River County,
Florida, to -wit:
Tract 6, Section 16, Township 33 South, Range 39 East,
according to the last general plat of lands of the Indian
River Farms Company Subdivision, as filed in Plat Book 2, page
25, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; said land now
situate in Indian River County, Florida.
Be changed from A-1 to RS -3 -
All with the meaning and intent and as set forth and described in
said Land Development Regulations.
Approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of
Indian River County, Florida, on this 5th day of January, 1993.
This ordinance was advertised in the Vero Beach Press -Journal
on the 11th day of December, 1992 for a public hearing to be held
38
ORDINANCE NO. 93-3
on the 5th -day of January, 1993 at which time it was moved for
adoption by Commissioner Macht , seconded by Commissioner
Tippin , and adopted by the following vote:
Comm. ._ - Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
�—
Commissioner Richard N. Bird e
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Ye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
BY: &6re�
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
ATTEST BY:
J ` e' R.' B ton, Cl k
VV
� . e
Acknowledgement by the Department of State of the State of Florida
this 13th day of January, 1993.
Effective Date: Acknowledgement from the Department of State
received on this 19th day of January , 1993, at 10:00
&x*./P.M. and filed in the office of the Clerk of the Board of
County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
William G. Collins II, Deputy County Attorney
RSbert M. Keating,] AICP
Community Development D rector
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JUDICIAL COMPLEX PROJECT CLOSED CIRCUIT
VIDEO/VOICE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
General Services Director Sonny Dean presented the following
memo dated December 17, 1992.
DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1992
TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, CTQJP�
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SER CES
SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JUDICIAL COMPLEX PROJECT
CLOSED CIRCUIT VIDEO/VOICE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
39
BOOK 88 F',42
�
JAS 5 ��''.
SAN � BOOK 88 22
BACKGROUND:
On July 14, 1992, the Board authorized staff to prepare a Request for
Qualifications and accept proposals from qualified firms to design
and build the referenced system.-
There
ystemaThere were three firms that submitted proposals and on December 16,
1992, the selection committee met to hear presentations from all four
of the prospective consultants. A pre -designed form using points for
qualifications in -various areas of importance was the methodology
used in the selection process. Total points from each committee
member's form determined final ranking of the firms.
ANALYSIS:
The prospective consultants were judged on their past experience in
similar projects, personnel qualifications, what they perceived the
scope of work to be, and how well their firm was prepared to perform
the various tasks. The committee ranked the consultants as follows:
1. Precision Contracting Services, Inc.
2. Cypress Communications, -Inc.
3. Vidicom Division, L.D. Bevan Company, Inc.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff respectfully request Board approval to negotiate with Precision
Contracting Services, Inc., for a contract to perform the subject
consulting work. The proposed contract will be brought back to the
Board of County Commissioners for their approval.
Director Dean explained that current system is linked via
microwave, which is very unreliable and is limited to one event at
any given time. There is money in the new Courthouse budget to
design and install a new fiberoptic system. Due to the size of
this project, it falls under the requirements of the Consultants'
Competitive Negotiation Act.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to negotiate with Precision Contracting
Services, Inc. for a contract to perform the subject
consulting work, and bring the proposal back to the
Board of County Commissioners for their approval, as
recommended by staff.
40
SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE NEW 18 - AMENDMENT NO. 6
The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 28, 1992:
TO: James E. Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
FROM: Terry B. Thompson, P.E.
Capital Projects Manager
SUBJECT: Sandridge Golf Course New 18
Amendment No. 6
DATE: December 28, 1992
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Kimley-Horn and Associates, - Inc. is under contract with
Indian River County to provide professional surveying, civil
and related miscellaneous services in all phases of the
Sandridge Golf Course New 18.
The attached amendment provides for design services to
prepare a Preliminary Engineering Report that addresses the
conditions contained in the SJRWMD Consumptive Use Permit.
Water can not be withdrawn from the new irrigation well at
Sandridge until all conditions of the Consumptive Use Permit
are satisfied.
The preliminary report will serve as a design document for
Step 2, which will be the development of plans and technical
specifications for implementation. Step 2 can not be
identified well enough at this time for a fee projection.
All concerned parties will be given the opportunity to
review a draft of the Preliminary Engineering Report before
it is finalized. Resulting comments will be incorporated
into the report. This comprehensive approach will provide
all parties with a better understanding of the means to
resolve the Consumptive Use Permit conditions while
providing the most efficient resolution possible.
Services for Amendment No. 6 will be performed on an hourly
rate basis - up to a not to exceed amount of $12,500. This,
added to ''the current contract amount of $104,923, will
result in a new contract amount of $117,423.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to
sign the attached Amendment No. 6. Funding is from Account
418-000-169-018.0-WIP Sandridge Phase II.
41
BOOK 88 F',1E 423
JA N 1993
-7
BOOK 88 PA;
E 4 24
Public Works Director Jim Davis explained more in detail the
requirements of the St. Johns River Water Management District
relating to the Consumptive Use Permit.
Golf Director Bob Komarinetz advised that the funding still
would come out of the golf course. The original budget was
$85,000, but since that time we have had to add additional
engineering services along the way.
Commissioner Adams asked and Director Davis explained that the
Water District has indicated that they need some: additional
engineering information. We need a comprehensive look at the Water
District for that whole area and how the irrigation of the golf
course affects that area. Right now, the Water District is not too
specific about what they will do and what they will not do..
Director Davis advised that we would have to provide pipe sizes and
we need to show them the impacts on the SWIM lake. This is a
fairly new approach for golf course irrigation and two of golf
courses that have been built just recently in the area did not have
to go through this. The Water District is getting very restrictive
for ground water and surface water.
Director Komarinetz explained that we are looking for a
compromise from them. _.—
Commissioner Adams felt the Water District is going to require
us to do that in any case, and Director Davis advised that we are
looking at 7 hours to look at this to see what further engineering
services we need. Some of the permitting agencies such as the
Water District are constantly changing their rules and
requirements.
Commissioner Adams was concerned that maybe we would have to
come back and pay another $12,500 to determine if more engineering
services are necessary if the Water district changes their mind
again, and Commissioner Tippin made an observation that the
Water District is a good example of the bureaucracy at work in
Florida government today. He felt everyone should be aware of the
fantastic power they have, and cautioned that the Water District
could change their minds again, even as early as this afternoon.
Director Davis felt our permit was the first one that got
caught up in the irrigation permit requirements and believed that
the Water District is anticipating that we will come back with a
request for modification of the requirements.
42
ON -"MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
Amendment No. 6 with Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc. in an amount not to exceed $12,500 for
additional design services to prepare a Preliminary
Engineering Report that addresses the conditions
contained in the SJRWMD Consumptive Use Permit, as
recommended by staff.
AMENDMENT NO. 6 IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE, CART STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE
BUILDINGS - CHANGE NO. 4 - BARTH CONSTRUCTION. INC.
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/16/92:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. DavisP.E.,
Public Works Director (=fr
SUBJECT: SANDRIDGE GOLF COURSE CLUBHOUSE,
CART STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS
Change Order No. 4
DATE:_ December 16, 1992 FILE: sandco4.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Construction is now complete on the Clubhouse and the following
items are addressed on the attached Change Order No. 4:
1) Increases to the contract amount for the following work:
Installation of necessary A.D.A Requirements - Items 1 and 3
Installation of miscellaneous electrical changes Item 4, and
5.
2) Deduction to contract for sodding area at buildings - Item 9
3) The remaining increases on Change Order No. 4 are items that
were added for minor changes such as Items 6, 7, and 10.
4) Items 2 and 8 - no additional cost
The total net change in contract price for Change Order No. 4 is
an increase In the amount of $1,173.17. The new contract amount
of $762-i-546.17 is $ 17,451.83 -below the estimated budget.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
Alternative No. 1
Authorize Change Order No. 4, finalizing the Contract.
Alternative No. 2
Deny Change Order No. 4 and re -negotiate.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends Alternative No. 1. Funding is from Account
418-000-169-008.00, Sandridge Golf Course, Clubhouse Const.
Construction in Progress.
C'N
rZ
JA � BOOK ®8 F.gGE
JAN 5 �99J
BOOK 88 PAU -7
,F 4?6
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order No. 4, finalizing the Contract with
Barth Construction, Inc., as recommended by staff.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD -.
RESOLUTIONS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO
AND SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR: 91ST AVENUE BETWEEN 79TH STREET
AND 87TH STREET IN VERO LAKES ESTATES
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/21/92:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director ✓
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E.
County Engineer 1111
FROM: Michelle A. GenVCad
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolutions to Provide for the Paving and Drainage Improvements to and set Public
Hearing date for: 91st Avenue between 79th Street and 87th Street in Vero Lake
Estates
DATE: December 21, 1992
M0 . ' •M,• • •
The County Public Works Department has.initiated a public improvements assessment for road
Paving and drainage improvements for 91st Avenue between 79th Street and 87th Street in Vero
Lake Estates in cooperation with the Vero Lake Estates Property Owners Association Road and
Drainage Committee.
A separate resolution will need to be adopted to hold a Public Hearing to discuss the advisability,
cost and amount of the assessment against each property owner.
This Public Hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, February 6', 1993 at 9:05 a.m. in the County
Commission Chambers.
An assessment roll and plat has been prepared and filed with the Clerk to the Board of County
Commissioners.
The project cost is $199,764.36. The following revenues are recommended:
MSTU
Special Assessment
44
$180,625.85 (90A+ -01b)
19.138.50 ( 9.6±°10)
$199,764.36 _
It is recommended that motions be made to:
1) Adopt the resolution providing for the paving and drainage improvements for the projects
subject to the terns outlined in the resolution. The applicable interest rate shall be 8% at the
time the final assessment roll is approved.
2) Allocate $19,138.50 from the Petition Paving Account #173-214-541-035.39.
3) Adopt a resolution setting the time and place of the Public Hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolutions 93-2 and 93-3, providing for the paving
and drainage improvements to and setting public
hearing date for 91st Avenue between 79th Street and
87th Street in Vero Lakes Estates.
Providing (First Reso.)
11/30/92(ENG)RESI.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 93-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
CERTAIN PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO 91ST
AVENUE* FROM 79TH STREET TO 87TH STREET IN VERO LAKE
ESTATES SUBDIVISION, PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED
COST, METHOD OF PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF
ANNUAL INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE
AREA SPECIFICALLY BENEFITED.
WHEREAS, the County Public Works Department has been
petitioned for Road Paving and Drainage Improvement for 91st Avenue
from 79th -Street to 87th Street in'Vero Lake Estates Subdivision.
WHEREAS, the construction of paving and drainage
improvements by special assessment funding is authorized by Chapter
206, Section 206.01 through 20 6.09, Indian River County Code; and
cost estimates and preliminary assessment rolls have been completed
45
L_ JAN 51993
BOOK,, .. V i
11
JAN 5 991 800K ®8 f'A F 428
No. 93- �2-
by the Public Works Department; and the total estimated cost of the
proposed paving and drainage improvements is ONE HUNDRED NINETY
NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR DOLLARS and THIRTY-SIX CENTS
_($199.764.36); and
WHEREAS, the special assessment provided hereunder shall,
for any given record owner of property within the area specially
benefited, be assessed to the owner at the rate of $2.00 per front
foot.' The amount to be assessed under the Special Assessment is
$19,138.50 which is approximately 9.56% ± of the total estimated
Post of the project and the balance of $180,625.86 shall come from
other revenue sources; and
WHEREAS, the special assessment shall become due and
payable at the Office of the Tax Collector of Indian River County
ninety (90) days after the final determination of the special
assessment pursuant to Section 206.08, Indian River County Code;
and
WHEREAS, any special assessment not paid within said
ninety (90) day period shall bear interest beyond the due date at
a rate established by the Board of County Commissioners at the time
of preparation of the final assessment roll, and shall be payable
in two (2) equal installments, the first to be made twelve (12)
months from the due date and subsequent payments to be due yearly;
and
WHEREAS, after examination of the nature and anticipated
usage of the proposed improvements, the Board of County
Commissioners has determined that the following described
properties shall receive a direct and special benefit from these
improvement, to wit:
46
No. 93- 2
Lots 5-& 6, Block 1; Lots 5 & 6, Block 2; Lots 5 &
_6, Block 3; Lots 5 & 6, Block 4; Lots 1 & 12, Block
5; Lots 1 & 12, Block 6; Lots 1 & 12, Block 7; Lots
1 & 12, Block 8 Vero Lake.Estates Unit 1, Plat Book
4, Page 41 of the Public Records of Indian River
County
Lots 9 - 16, Block 11; Lots 1 - 8, Block 12 Vero
Lake Estates, Unit 2, Plat Book 4, Page 52 of the
Public Records of Indian River County.
Lots 9 - 16, Block 15; Lots 1 - 8, Block 16 Vero
Lakes Estates, Unit 3, Plat Book 4, Page 59 of the
Public Records of Indian River County.
Lots 9 - 16, Block 19; Lots 1 - 8, Block 20 Vero
Lake Estates, Unit 4, Plat Book 4, Page 88 of the
Public Records of Indian River County.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are affirmed and ratified in
their entirety.
2. A project providing for paving and drainage
improvements to 91st Avenue from 79th Street to 87th Street in Vero
Lakes Estates Subdivision; heretofore designated as Public Works
Project No. 9211 is hereby approved subject to the terms outlined
above and all applicable requirements of Chapter 206, et seq.
Indian River County Code.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner
Eggert who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the
vote was a& -follows: -
47
L_ J Aid 51993 BOOK 88 F,,;F429
I
JAN 5 1993 BOOK 8® rm',4 0 -7
_ 6nmm. • Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner.. Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution passed and
adopted this 5 day of January , 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By_ c
Richard N. Bird, Chairman
Attest:
JET, �e Y K.
DyMa� B TON,'�rkq.o.
Time and Place (Second Reso.)
11/30/92(ENG)RES2.MAG\gfk
RESOLUTION NO. 93- 3
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN -RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS
OF PROPERTY ON 91ST AVENUE FROM 79TH STREET TO
87TH STREET IN VERO LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION
AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS MAY APPEAR BEFORE
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE HEARD
AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF MAKING
PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID
PROPERTY AS TO THE COST THEREOF, AS TO THE
MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS TO THE
AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED
AGAINST EACH PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River
County has, by Resolution No. q_j_� , determined that it is
necessary for the public welfare of the citizens of the
county, and particularly as to those living, working, and
owning property within the area- described hereafter, that
paving and drainage improvements be made to; and
48
RESOLUTION NO. 93-_5_
WHEREAS, -the Board of County Commissioners has caused an
assessment roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to
the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code,
requires that the Board of County Commissioners shall fix a
time and place at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed or any other persons interested therein may appear
before the Board of County Commissioners and be heard as to
the propriety and advisability of making paving and drainage
improvements, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of
payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed
against each property benefited thereby,
NOW,- THEREFORE, BE IT- RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet at the County Commission
chambers in the County Administration Building at the hour
Of 9:05 A.M. on Tuesdav, Februa 9 1993, at which time
the owners of the properties to be assessed and any other
interested persons may appear before said Commission and
be heard in regard thereto. The area to be improved and
the properties to be specially benefited are more
particularly described upon the assessment plat and the
assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said
improvements and the special assessments against the
properties to be specially benefited may review the
assessment plat showing the area to be assessed, the
assessment roll, the plans and specifications for said
improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the
office of the Clerk to the Board any week dray from 8:30
A.M. until 5:00 P.M.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall
be given by the Department of Public Works by two
49
JAN 5 1993 BOOK 88
r JARI
BOOK 88 Pk',F.4.32
publications in the Vero Beach Press Journal Newspaper a
week
apart.
The
last
publication'shall
be
at least one
week
prior to
the
date
of the hearing.
The
Indian River
County Department of Public Works shall give the owner of
each property to be specially assessed at least ten days
notice in writing of such time and place, which shall be
served by mailing a copy of such notice to each of such
property owners at his last known address. -
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Eggert � ----"
and the motion was seconded 'by Commissioner
Adams , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Comm. Carolyn K. Eggert
Commissioner Richard N. Bird Aye
Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
Aye
Commissioner John W. Ti
ppin Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 5 day of January
, 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN 2RI-ER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By `
RICHARD N. BIRD
Chairman
ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT - UTILITY SERVICE TO I-95 ON SR -60
HILL GAS STATION
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/4/92:
DATE: DECEMBER 14, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILI SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F. MCCAIN
AND STAFFED CAPITAL PROJECTS EN
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: UTILITY SERVICE TO I-95 ON ROUTE 60; HILL GAS
STATION (CITGO) DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT
IRC PROJECT NOS. IIS -92 -26 -DS AND IIS -92 -27 -CS
50
BACKGROUND
On August 25, 1992 (see attached agenda item and minutes), the
Board of County Commissioners authorized the Utilities Department
to proceed with the design of the water and sewer service to the
commercial node on State Road 60 and I-95. At the same time, Hill
Gas Station (Citgo) was designing a water main from 90th Avenue and
State Road 60 intersection to -the western property line of the
Citgo site. Since the survey and preliminary design were complete,
we are proposing to enter into a developers agreement for the
design and construction of the master planned water and wastewater
on the south side of State Road 60 from 90th Avenue to the western
property line of the Citgo site. (See attached proposed developers
agreement.) -
ANALYSIS
Through the use of this developers agreement, we will accomplish -
two things:
1) We will expedite the construction of the master planned
utilities on State Road 60.
2) It will allow the Citgo project to control its own
development schedule; and allow the use of previously
completed engineering work.
The Utilities Department project to service the commercial node at
State Road 60 and I-95 will now begin at the western edge of the
Citgo property on the south and remains the same as originally
proposed on the north. Surveys for our in-house design will be
completed in the first week of January and design on the remainder
of the project can begin at that time and on schedule.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the attached developers
agreement with General Equities Inc., DBA Citgo (Hill Gas Station)
and authorize the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners to-
execute
oexecute same.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the Developers Agreement with General Equities Inc.,
dba Citgo (Hill Gas Station) for utility service to
I-95 and SR -60.
DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
51
L -JAN 51993 Boa 88 PnF 4:33
BOOK 88 PA -UF 434
WATER SERVICE IN BRADY OARS SUBDIVISION - RESOLUTIONS I AND II
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/11/92:
DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAS=('�PROJECTS AND STAFFED MANAGER OF AS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER SERVICE IN SHADY OAKS SUBDIVISION
(EAST OF 43RD AVENUE, SOUTH OF OSLO ROAD)
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -92 -19 -DS
RESOLUTIONS I AND II
BACKGROUND
On July 7, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved the petition for water service to Shady Oaks
Subdivision (south of 9th Street, SW (Oslo Road) and east of 43rd
Avenue). Design service has been completed, and we are ready to
begin the assessment process associated with this project. (See
attached agenda item and minutes.)
ANALYSIS
Attached please find Resolutions I and II for the assessment
project. The project will serve 50 lots, and 44% of the lots in
this project are substandard or "undersized," according to Indian
River County's Comprehensive Plan and the County Public Health Unit,
Division of Environmental Health. New lots utilizing well and
septic systems must be a minimum of one-half acre in size. Lots not
meeting these minimum standards are called "undersized lots." This
project is to be paid through the assessment of property benefitting
along the proposed water line route. In the interim, financing will
be through the use of impact fee funds. The total estimated
construction cost, including engineering_ and administration of the
.project is $111,699.92. The projected cost per square foot is
$0.084649. The attached map displays the area to benefit from the
assessment project.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolutions and
set the assessment hearing date.
52
ON T40TION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Eggert, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolutions 93-4 and 93-5, providing for water main
extension to and setting a public hearing date of
January 26, 1993 for Shady Oaks Subdivision east of
43rd Avenue and south of Oslo Road.
W
A
1993 ®ooK F.{Ij 35
F'_3 A � 193 BOOK 88 F,{JF 36 -7
a
Providing (First Reso.)
12/14/92(legal)Vk/DC
RESOLUTION NO. 93
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
PROVIDING FOR WATER MAIN EXTENSION TO SHADY OAKS
SUBDIVISION EAST OF 43RD AVENUE AND SOUTH OF OSLO
ROAD/ -PROVIDING THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST, METHOD OF
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, NUMBER OF ANNUAL
INSTALLMENTS, AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA
SPECIFICALLY SERVED. -
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
has determined that the improvements herein described are necessary to
promote the public welfare of the county and has determined to defray.
the cost thereof by special assessments against certain properties to be
serviced by a water main extension to Shady Oaks Subdivision east of
43rd Avenue and South of Oslo Road, hereinafter referred -to as Project
No. UW -92 -19 -DS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County does hereby determine that a water main extension shall
be installed to provide service for 50 lots, which are located
generally as described above, and the cost thereof shall be
specially assessed in accordance with the provisions of Sections
206.01 through 206.09 of the Code of Indian River County.
2. The total estimated project assessment cost of the above-described
improvements is shown to be $111,699.92 or $0.084649 per square
foot to be paid by the property specially benefited as shown on the
assessment plat on file with the Department of Utility Services.
3. A special assessment in the amount of $0.084649 per square foot
shall be assessed against each of the properties designated on the
assessment plat. This assessment may be raised or lowered by
action of the Board of County Commissioners after the public
hearing, at the same meeting, as required by the referenced County
Code.
4. The
special
assessments shall
be due and payable and may be paid in
full
within
90 days after the
date of the resolution -of the Board
54
with respect to credits against the special assessments after
completion of the improvements (the "Credit Date") without
interest.
If not paid in full, the special assessments may be paid in ten
equal yearly installments of principal plus interest. If not paid
when due, there shall be added a penalty of 1-1/2% of the principal
not paid when due. The unpaid balance of the special assessments
shall bear interest at a rate of 8% from the Credit Date until
paid.
5. There is presently on file with the Department of Utility Services
a plat showing the area to be assessed, plans and specifications,
and an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements. All of
these are open to inspection by the public at the Department -of
Utility Services.
6. An assessment roll with respect to the special assessments shall
promptly be prepared in connection with the special assessments.
7. Upon the adoption of this resolution, the Indian River County
Utility Services Department shall cause this resolution (along with
a map showing the areas to be served) to be published at least one
time in the Vero Beach Press Journal before the public hearing
required by Section 206.04.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner
Carolyn
K. Eggert
Aye
Commissioner
Richard
N. Bird
Aye
Commissioner
John W.
Tippin
Aye
Commissioner
Fran B.
Adams
Aye
Commissioner
Kenneth
R. Macht
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 5th day of January, 1993.
Attest:
Jeff r K. Barton, Clerk
�
55
L_ JAN 51993
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
ICHARD N. BIRD
Chairman
BOOK �� F: r �� .
s
A
.j
BOOK -7
JAN �99 88 PA;r IS
v
Time and Place (second Reso.)
10/14/93 (legal) Vk/DC /-j' c' -5 -
RESOLUTION
j'`' -
RESOLUTION NO. 93-15
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA,
SETTING A TIME AND PLACE AT WHICH THE OWNERS OF
PROPERTIES LOCATED GENERALLY IN THE AREA OF SHADY
OARS -SUBDIVISION, EAST OF 43RD AVENUE AND SOUTH OF
OSLO ROAD, AND OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS, MAY APPEAR
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND BE
HEARD AS TO THE PROPRIETY AND ADVISABILITY OF
CONSTRUCTING A WATER MAIN, AS TO THE COST THEREOF,
AS TO THE MANNER OF PAYMENT THEREFOR, AND AS:W-THE
AMOUNT THEREOF TO BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AGAINST EACH
PROPERTY BENEFITED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, the Board 'of County Commissioners of Indian River County
has, by Resolution No. 93-4, determined that it is necessary for the
Public welfare of the citizens -of the county, and particularly as to
those living, working, and owning property within the area described
hereafter, that a waterline be installed in approximately 50 lots
hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the cost to be specially
assessed with respect thereto shall be $0.084649 per square foot; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has caused an assessment
roll to be completed and filed with the Clerk to the Board; and
WHEREAS, Section 206.06, Indian River County Code, requires that
the Board of County Commissioners -shall fix a time and place at which
the owners of the properties to be assessed or any other persons
interested therein may appear before the Board of County Commissioners
and be heard as to the propriety and advisability of constructing such
water main extension, as to the cost thereof, as to the manner of
payment therefor, and as to the amount thereof to be assessed against
each property benefited thereby,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
1. The County Commission shall meet.at the County Commission Chambers
in the County Administration Building at the hour of -9:05 a.m. on
Tuesday, January 26, 1993, at which time the owners of the
properties to be assessed and any other interested- persons may
appear before said Commission and be heard in regard thereto. The
56
area to be improved and the properties to be specially benefited
are more particularly described upon the assessment plat and
the
assessment roll with regard to the special assessments.
2. All persons interested in the construction of said improvements and
the special assessments against the properties to be specially
benefited may review the assessment plat showing the area to be
assessed, the 'assessment roll, the plans and specifications for
said improvements, and an estimate of the cost thereof at the
office of the Department of Utility Services any week day from 8:30
a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3. Notice of the time and place of this public hearing shall be given
by two publications in the Press Journal Newspaper one week apart.
The last publication shall be at least one week prior to the date
- of the hearing. The Indian River County Department of Utility
Services shall give the owner of each property to be specially
assessed at least ten days notice in writing of such time and
place, which shall be served by mailing a copy of such notice to
each of such property owners at his last known address.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Adams ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Eggert , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner
Carolyn
K. Eggert
Aye
Commissioner
Richard
-N. Bird
Aye
Commissioner
John W.
Tippin
Aye
Commissioner
Fran B.
Adams
Aye
Commissioner
Kenneth
R. Macht
Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 5 day of January , 1993.
BOARD'OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Attest:
Jeffrey K. Barton, C7z,
BY! (.Tdu....� 4.+ 0 -(; .
Attachment: ASSESSMENT ROLL
SVA
BY "U��
RICHARD N. -BIRD
Chairman
JAN �� � BOOK 88 Nk']F ,�9
BOOK 88 PAGE 440 -7
RESIGNATION FROM CHILDREN'S SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/29/92:
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Joyce Johnston - Director of Welfare Divisi n
DATE: December 29, 1992
RE: Resignation from Children's Services Adv26ry Committee
Pursuant to Resolution 90-167 I was appointed a member of the
Children's Services Advisory Committee. Just prior to the December
17, 1992 meeting of that Committee, I was informed by the County
Administrator that I would be the primary staff support to the
Committee. At the December_ 17, 1992 meeting, counsel for the
committee raised the problem that would be created with the sunshine
law if I were to be both staff support and a member. This would
effectively deter me from communicating with the Chairman and members
except at a public sunshine meeting. The consensus was that I would
be of greater value to the committee as staff than as a member .
In view of the foregoing, I hereby submit my resignation and request
that it be accepted effective December 17, 1992.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously accepted
Joyce Johnston's resignation from the Children's
Services Advisory Committee.
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/28/92 and made
the changes written in longhand:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Board of County DATE: December 28, 1992
Commissioners
RE: Committee appointments
and reappointments
FROM: Alice E. White
Executive Secretary -
The following committees need appointments or reappointments:
58
BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT (2 year terms)
Present incumbents: '
Barbara B. Power- (District 1)
Fred Plair (District 3)
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS (4 year terms)
Present incumbents: --
John Calmes
Paul Jacobi
Russell Trina
CH?I-DRFN' S SERVICES ADVISORY_ _COMMI_TTEE (2 year terms)
Present incumbents:Kenneth Macht
Macht
Judge Joe Wild
Bonnie Swanson
Wayne McDonough
Pat Callahan C/ a
Joyce Johnston - /
CODE ENFORCEMENTBOARD
Present incumben_ts:____
Vacancy (At large)
Vacancy (Business)
( 3 year terms)
�"I
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING (1 year term)
Present incumbent :----------'-'-----
John Tippin
LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (2 year terms)
Present incumbents:
_ _
Kenneth Macht
Carolyn Corum
Fritz Gierhart
Patricia Brown
Dr. Richard Baker
Talmage Rogers Jr.
John Orcutt Jr.
LOCAs, ENERGY MANAGEMENT (1 year term)
Present incumbent: '
Doug Wright
OVERALL EXTENSION COMMITTEE_ (2 year terms)
Present incumbents: '
Betty Gipson (District 2)
Vacancy (District 3)
PARKS AND_RECREATION (1 year_term)
Present incumbents:
Richard N. Bird
Carl Pease
Leroy Hiers
George Schum
John McDonald
Annie Grace Foster
Dale Klaus
-99
JAN 51993
Bou 88 P,U.441
JAN 199
a
BOOK 88 PvF 442
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (4 year terms)
Present incumbents: -
Vacancy (District 5)
Leland Gibbs (District 3)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (2 year terms)
Present incumbents: -
Rodney Paradise
Robert Swift
Fred Banfield
Robert Gaskill
Vacancy (Small Business)
REGIONAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT (1 year term)
Present incumbent: '
Doug Wright
TOURIST DEVELOPMENT C_OUNCIL_. (4 year terms)
Present incumbents:'
- Pati 1 Rc 7� 7 cy �%may
TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED LOCAL COORDINATING BD. (3 year term)
Present incumbents :
Rent Rice - Christine Heshmati, Alternate (DOT)
Carolyn Samuel (Dept. of Labor and Employment Security)
Jerry Ashcraft (Rep. for Elderly)
Vacancy (Citizen Advocate) ** term expires in 1995 **
Harry Hurst (Citizen Advocate)
REVIEW OF COMPLETE LISTING OF COMMITTEES AND MEMBERS
The Board reviewed the following list of committees and
appointments and indicated that there would be further appointments
and some restructuring of committees at a later late.
60
1
1
�-Q
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
IBMIRD/Comm 12/28/92
- -----------------------
....._..............------
Page'1
TITLE
1992 INCUMBENT TERM EXPIRATION .....................-----.--•-
1993
1994 1995 1996 1997
Chairman of the Boa'rd'---Carolyn
K. Eggert ------------------------------ * ---------
--------------
Vice Chairman of Board,
Richard N. Bird
_______
�- - ----"- ,
County Administrator
James Chandler Serve at Discretion of the
Board
County Attorney
Charles Vitunac Serve at Discretion of the
Board
ExPeutive Aide
to the. Board
Elizabeth Forlani Serve at Discretion of the
Board
Ad Hoc Manatee
Fran B. Adams
Protection 6
Tim Adams
Serves until task has been completed•
Boating Safety
David Ferrell/Bob Pace
Committee
John Jackson
Elaine Johnson
Bruce MacIntyre
N
George Phreaner•
Jack Reeder
Advisory Committee for
the Center for Business
Development (IRCC
,
Committee)
Richard -N. Bird
Affordable Housing
Carolyn K. Eggert (B.C.C.) (Serves at Discretion of
Board)
Advisory Committee
Charles Cox (Citizen - Coalition for Homeless)
Charles Davis (Citizen - Realtor)
Tom Eby (Financial Institution)
Bill Elliott. (Citizen - Community -Murch - Habitat for Humanity)
Charles Lavin (Financial Institution)
Lynette Bell (Financial Institution)
Deborah Mayfield (Financial Institute)
Randy Riley (Financial Institution)
Q,
Wendy Feinsilver (Board of Realtors)
C:)
Carl Stratton (Business)
Margaret Rocke (Housing Authority)
Lynn Wright (Financial Institution)
DO
Tim Zorc (Housing Industry)
Scott Mi r1yonet (T-arldscalie Az chitect)
f
ti
T1.
•
(�n�
W
1
1
1
1
rn
N
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
-------- -. -_ ...................... ........................ -----• Page 2
TERM EXPIRATIO
N -•-- - -- -- _ ----------
TITLE 1992 INCUMBENT ,1993 1994 -1995 1996r 1997
Agency on Aging---------......._------.................-- ---------- ------...-------------------- •--------------------
Dist. IX (State) Carolyn K. Eggert--^
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, John Tippin (Dec. 1992)
& Mental Health Judge Paul Kanarek (June, 1992)
Planning Council Sue Schlitt (3990) September (2)
(State Committee) John Krupp (June, 1992) September (1)
(2 year staggered terms)Andy Bradley (Appt.May 1990) September (2)
(cannot serve more than)
( 3 consecutive terms)
(* third term)
Audit Selection
Committee
Beach Restoration &
Preservation
Committee
(Res. 80-30)
Board of.Trustees of
Law Library
(2 year term)
' ioard of '• Zoning
Adjustment
(2 year terms)
(Ord. 73-2)
Kenneth Macht
Jeff Bart n
Sheriff
DavidK41te
Ann Robinson
Fran Adams
Bill Jordan
James Haeger
Michael Rose
Bob Tenbus
John J. Morrison
Dr. Jay Langfelder
John D. Orcutt, Jr.
Carolyn K. Eggert
Barbara B. Power (Dist 1)
John A. Kirchner (Dist 2)
Fred Plair (Dist 3)
Ralph J. Lindsey (Dist 4)
Dorothy Hudson (Dist 5)
Serve at Discretion of the Board
Serve at Discretion of the Board
January
January
January
January
January
January
rn
w
co
0
0
c�
C"
_^__.___.__.._...--------------------- COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS
Page 3
TITLE r
1992 INCUMBENT
TERM EXPIRATION ---------------_..'...........
._ "
1994
1995
" .............-
1996 1997
Suildiag Code bbard -
..John Calmes -------"---"_"-""'"--_"---January
--------"--"---'_"------------------
of Adjustments
Paul Jacobi
January
(4 year terms)
Dean Luethje
(Res. 78-50)
Russell Trimm
T'Peter
January
January
Robinson
Leon Walton
January
January
John Kirchner
January
Children's Services
Kenneth Macht
January
Advisory Committee
Judge Joe Wild
January
(Res. 90-167)
Bonnie Swanson
January
(2 year terms)
Wayne McDonough
January
Sue Banak - Alternate
Rev. Henry Holmes
January
Pat Callahan
January
Pegi Wilkes - Alternate
Patty Hinton
January
Marcy Purdy
January
'
A Sandra Eckhardt,
January
Anthony Donadio
Joyce Johnston
January
January
Code Enforcement Bd.
CKE Vacancy (At large)
January
(3 year terms)
RNB John Owens
January
(Ord. 83-10)
BCC Robert A. Reid (Architect)
January
(Changed by State
BCC Anthony Gervasio (Org.Labor)
January
Statute Ch.162)
DCS Joseph Garone (Gen.Contr)
January
GCW Vacancy (Business)
January
MCB David Haeseler (Real Estate)
January
1
11
1
1
. ..................................
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS Page 4
TITLE
...........
1992 INCUMBENT
TERM E----- IOIV--------------•--------------•-—
Community Development._-...-.------------------_....------------.---------------------------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Block Grant Adv.
(State Committee)
Comm. Carolyn K. Eggert, Ch.
_
Guy Decker
•
James Chandler
Robert Keating
Solomon Murphy
William Rigby
Joe Idlette
Walter Jackson
Ralph Lundy
Victor Hart, Sr.
Mrs. Bernice Johnson
Mrs. Annie Jenkins
Arthur J. Harris
Harold McKinney
Joe Wiggins
Christine Browning
0% County Correctional
Planning Committee
Chairman, County CommissionServe
L. B. Vocelle, Circuit
s at Discretion of the Board p
Judge
Joseph Wild, Co. Judge
Lynn Park
Jan Hendrickson
Capt. Calvin Jones
Don Cureton
William Koolage
Courthouse Advisory
Kenneth Macht
Committee
r�
0
-------------------------
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
11—
Page 5
TITLE r
1 "'�------------------TERM E%PIRATION ....-------------------•-_--_-_-.--_---
992 INCUMBENT 1993
1994
1995 1996 1997
Economic Devel'opmen't
`Carolyn K Eggert, -Ch. " --""-"""'"'"'-Serves
Council
at Discretion
Council of 100 (Talmage Rogers
of Board
-
(Res. 85-86)
Jr.)
J. Ralph Lundy
td. of Realtors (Wendy Feinsilver)
inda Lindsey
Martin Wall
City of Sebastian (George Reid)
City of Vero Beach (Bill Jordan)
IRC School Board (Joe N. Idlette Jr.)
Ned Gartner
'Peter Robinson
President, Chamber of Commerce (Dean Luethje)
Keith Pelan
City of Fellsmere (Vacancy)
.Vacancy
Economic Opportunities
Henry Jefferson
Council (1 year term)
(no'limit of terms
January
'
f -6r public officials
or their reps.)
(State Committee)
RCC allowed 2 appointments - in 1991, since BCC did nota
January, the EOC appointed Ann
oint 2
vacancy.
people by the first meeting in
Reuter to fill the second
Emergency'Services
Carolyn Eggert, Chairman
District Advisory
Fran Adams
January
Committee
Jay Smith (City of Vero Beach)
January
(4 year terms)
Carl Pease (City of Vero Beach)January
January
Lee Carter (City of Fellsmere)
January
Lonnie Powell (City of Sebastian)
Ernest Polverar.i (Town of Orchid)
January
January
Arthur.Harris (Wabasso/Gifford)
January
Andy Peterson (Vero Beach Vol. Fire Dept.)
January
CD
1K
Patricia Johnson Hyden (North County Vol. Fire Dept.)
Jim Judge (Emergency Services)
January
Wilbour Tripp Jr. (Paid So. Co. Fire Dept.)
January
Vacancy (Paid No. Co. Fire Dept.)
Januar Y
January
I
Byron Cooksey (At Large)
January
�y
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
—----------------............................... --- Page 6
TITLE 1992 INCUMBENT -TERM EXPIRATION "-""------" -' -------•------_•_,_
1993 1994 1995 1996
Env ronmental Contro'1 _ •--•--- 1997
Chairman of BCC
Board ---------•--•-----------------------------------
BCC sits as this Board - --
Environmental Control Rodger Zwemer
Hearing Board John D. Orcutt, Jr.
(No term specified Alan S. Polackwich, Sr.
(Began 12/5/85) Eleanor Van Os
(Set by State Statute) Steve Snoberger
• Firearms Range Comm. Richard N. Bird -
(Board Motion) Roy Raymond Serves at Discretion of Board
H.L. "Sonny" Dean
John S. Amos
Russell Petersen
Alexander M. Smith
a% Bill F. Stegkemper !�
0% Fritz E. Gierhart
Reed Knight, Jr.
Edwin E. Potter, Jr.
John Olbermann
Gifford-Housing Carolyn K. Eggert
Improvement Comm. Robert Keating Serves at Discretion of Board
(Board motion) Michael Galanis
(meets once a year) Ester Rymer
Margaret Rocks
J. Ralph Lundy
Guy Decker
Tommy Lee Turner
Lloyd Powell
Aquilla Moore
Essie Turner
Gulfstream Areawide Polly Crowell
Council on Aging, Inc.
Op0
0
GO
00
Cn
_.--- COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS page 7
--___...---------------•-----------------..-----------'T�_RMYM32ATrIbY----..-..-_-----------
TITLE - 1992 INCUMBENT 1993 1994 1995 1996
1997
Health & Human Services Leonard Edwards
Board -District 15 Joyce Johnson Carlson
(State Committee) Sonja Galanis
Historic Resources Fran Adams (Serves at Discretion of Board)
Advisory Committee :11M. E. (Gene) Roddenberry I'
Anthony J. Donadio
Carolyn F. Short
Arline Westfahl
Housing Authority Margaret Rocke Governor Appoints
(State Committee) Caroline Stuckey
Pearl Jackson
Sheila Engel
Godfrey Gibson
IRC Council on John Tippin January
i
Ag ng
a% IR Emergency outreach
Board
Kenneth Macht
Indian River Lagoon
National Estuary
Program
Fran Adams
Land Acquisition Adv.
Kenneth Macht (B.C.C.)
January
Committee
Jay Smith (City of Vero Beach)
January
(2 year terms)
Carolyn Corum (Sebastian)
January
Joseph Brooks (Fellsmere)
January
Fritz Gierhart (Indian River Shores)
January
.Ernest Polverari (Orchid)
January
Patricia Brown (I.R.Land Trust)
January
Ruth Stanbridge (Sierra Club)
January
Dr. Richard Baker (Pel.Isl.Aud.Soc.)
January
Herndon Williams (Bd. of Realtors)
January
Talmage Rogers Jr.(Council of 100)
January
Robert Schoen (Taxpayers Assoc.)
January
John Orcutt Jr. (Civic Assoc.)
January
John Morrison (Agricultural)
January
Robert Swift (Developer)
January
i
1
1
[J
C -a
3
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
...._...---•---
................... ........------��... ~------ Page 8
TERM EXPIRATIO---------------
TITLE 1992 INCUMBENT • ----------- - - - - - - - - - - �- ---
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
(2w earLi rterms __--Carolary
yn EggertTaiiha'ry.------ .--------------- —
Y )
Liaison between Elizabeth Forlani
Co. & Commission
on Ethics
Liaison between Co.
and I.R.C. Council
of 100 Carolyn K. Eggert (interim - Kenneth Macht)
Local Energy Mgt. Doug Wright January
Marine Advisory Richard N. Bird Serves at Discretion of the Board
Narrows Watershed Tim Adams
Action Committee John Amos
rn R
(es• 89-25) Brian Barnett
ao ,
Diane Barile
George Bunnell
Marvin Carter
Oren Deacon
David Gunter
John E. Jackson
Kevin Doty
Peter O'Bryan'
George Phreaner
Dennis Hanisak
Bill Moody
Medical Examiner Budget John Tippin
Committee Jae Baird
0
0
00
Q0
.T
co
00
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
----.................................... ------------------ Page 9
TITLE 1992 INCUMBENT TRM EEXPIRATION-----"----""."'. ----------
+1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Metropolitan Planning' 4 BCC (Carolyn Eggert= Chairmanj
Or(9283
anizdG(MPO) (Fran Adams) ........ ..-•-----------------
Res. ) (Richard Bird)
.(John W. Tippin)
2 members - City of Vero Beach (Carl Pease)
(Bill Jordan)
Sebastian (Frank Oberbeck)
(Peter Holyk - Alternate)
Indian River Shores (Robert Schoen)
Fellsmere (Renee Herrera)
Orchid - nonvoting member - Lynn Velde
School Board - nonvoting member - Stan Mayfield
Dorothy Talbert- Alternate
FDOT - Gus Schmidt
FDOT - Jim Scully
MPO Technical John Amos
Advisory Committee John Curtin
Sgt. David Cuddie/Lt. Kenneth Hamilton
Robert Keating
Jim Davis
Michael Dudeck
Kathleen Geyer
Cliff Suthard
Dennis Ragsdale
Tom Fritz
MPO Citizens Advisory
Committee
I
1
C-
----------- _------------------------ ------------------ COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS -------------------- -Page 10
TERM EXPIRATI0�1
TITLE 1992 INCUMBENT 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
19t Jud c al Cfrcui't --Join Tippin ---_.....-----------------......------------_.--------...---._...._...._..--------------
Conflict Comm. Joe Baird
(State Committee)
Overall Extension Comm. Lu Cosner (Dist 1) January
(2 year terms) Betty Gipson (Dist 2) January
.(State Committee) Vacancy (Dist 3) January
Cathy Rovella (Dist 4) January
Hildie Tripson (Dist 5) January
Parks & Recreation Richard N. Bird January
(1 year terms) Carl Pease January
(Res. 81-19) Leroy Hiers January
George Schum January
John McDonald January
Annie Grace Foster January
v Dale Klaus January
Planning & Zoning Vacancy (Dist 5) January
Commission William A. McNamee (Dist 2) January
(4 year terms) Leroy Hiers (Dist 1) January
(Res. 74-8) Leland Gibbs (Dist 3) January
John Marino (Dist 4) January
Monte K. Falls (at large) January
Daniel Richey (at large) January
0
0
05
00
� tl
IND
N
------------------------..............COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS
11
TITLE
1992 INCUMBENT
..
TERM EXPIRATION
------------------------page
'
1993.
1994
1995
1996 1997
Primary Care/Public
' Carolyn R. Eggert-------------- '--------------------------------------___._
Health Committee
Dr. David Becker
______ _ _
�- -�-�—
(State Committee -
Joyce Salter
Scope expanded by
County
`',Jim Judge
1'Gwen
Commission)
Shepherd
Dr. Bernard Berman,
Joyce Johnston
Gerald Koziel
Victor Hart Sr.
Jean Kline
Carol Malloy
Joan Kostenbader
Professional Services
Peter Robinson
Advisory Committee
Todd Smith
January
(Res. 90-156 &)
Warren Dill
January
Res. 91-19)
James Beindorf
January
(2-year terms)
Keith Pelan
January
oRodney ParadiseJanuary
January
Robert Swift
January
Fred Banfield
January
Robert Gaskill
January
Jeffrey-P. Meyer
January
Small Business Representative
January
Alternates - Frank Johnson
Edward Weinberg
Public Library Adv. Bd.
Carolyn K. Eggert
(Ord. 86-60) . 4 yr terms
�l¢¢�¢jf/�//�L�gi�I¢ Vacancy
January
January
Sam Pascal
January
Jean.Versteeg
January .
John Holmes
Donna Green
Januar
Januar
Peg Rondeau
January
Philip Mank, Jr.
January
Regional Energy Mgt.
Doug Wright
January
(1 year term)
1
a
r
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTSPage 12
-
---------- --------------------•---------------------
TITLE. 19 9 2 INCUMBENT TERM EXPIRATION
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Sebastian Waters�ied - Fran Adams -'---'-"'-
Action -"-'-"--'------------------------------
Committee ------
(Marine Resources Council Committee)
Solid Waste Disposal
District Richard N.. Bird, Chairman
BCC sits as this Board'.' John Tippin, Vice Chairman
Tourist Development John Tippin (BCC)
Council George Bunnell (Ind.Rvr.Shores) January
(4 yr. terms) Kevin Dot January
Doty (City of Vero Beach)
Kevin Crowe (Owner/Oper.Motel) JanuaryJanuary
Sam Pascal (Owner/Oper.Motel) January
Paul Kelley (Owner/Oper.Motel) January
Richard Bireley, Jr. (Retail) January
R. M. Tenbus (Airport) January
v
John Morrison (Beach Preservation Comm.) January N Transportation Disadvantaged 1 0
Local Coordinating Carolyn Eggert (Chairman) January
Board Florida Department of Transportation January
(3 year terms) (Rent Rice - Alternate, Christine Heshmati)
Health & Rehabilitative Services (Terry Brown) January
Public Education Community (Cookie Geyer) January
Florida Department of Labor and Employment
Security (Carolyn Samuel) January
Representative of Veterans (Vince McCann) January
(Renk Toussaint - Alternate)
Economically Disadvantaged
(Commission's Community Action
Representative) (Pearl Jackson) January
Person over 60 years of age (Jerry Ashcraft)January
Handicapped person (Mae Arnold) January
2 Citizen Advocates -representatives
(one must represent a user of
the system) Vacancy January
(Harry Hurst) January
Dept. of Elder Affairs (Kasha Owers) January
9
av
0
0
0-A
7*41
rn
N
11
- ------.____------__--- ..... COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS ----------------------------"Page 13 _
TITLETERM EXPIRATION
1992 INCUMBENT 1993 1994 1995 1996
1997
Treasure Coast Council ------------------_--------------------------------.------
of Governments John Tippin F'"'�""..............-
Treasure Coast Gerald Roziel (Consumer)
Health Council July 1 (1)
(2 years) (Alternates Provider with Consumer - State Committee)
Treasure Coast Regional Carolyn R. Eggert (Rep) John Tippin December
Planning Council Richard N. Bird (Alt) December
Margaret C. Bowman (Rep) Fran Adams December
Carolyn Eggert (Alt) December
Municipality Represent. December 1992 (Fellsmere 1991-92) (Fellsmere 1992-1993)
Municipality Alternate December 1992 (Orchid 1991-92) (Orchid 1992-1993)
Upper St. Johns Richard N. Bird
Recreation Advisory L. S. "Tommy" Thomas (Alternate)
Council James Thomas
v Roland DeBlois (Alternate)
w
Upper St. Johns Technical
Advisory Committee Richard N. Bird
Vero Beach Bicycle Path Richard N. Bird (BCC)
Committee Vacancy (P&R Comm)
(City/County) Lisa Abernethy (At -large)
(No terms specified)
Vero Beach Recreation Richard N. Bird
Committee
(2 year terms)
January
1
1
,'9
500K PAGE 45
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
Chairman Bird announced that immediately upon adjournment the
Board would reconvene sitting as the Commissioners of the Solid
Waste Disposal District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:33 o'clock A.M.
ATTEST:
J. arton, Clerk
74
z � �Z-, g
Ri8fiard N. Bird, Chairman