HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/26/1993MINUTES ATTACHED
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 26, 1993
9:00 A.M. - COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
1840 25TH STREET
VERO BEACH, FLORIDA
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Richard N. Bird, Chairman (Dist. 5)
John W, Tippin, Vice Chairman (Dist. 4)
Fran B. Adams ( Dist. 1)
Carolyn K. Eggert (Dist. 2)
Kenneth R. Macht ( Dist. 3)
James E. Chandler, County Administrator
Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk to the Board
9: 00 A. M. I. CALL TO ORDER PAGE
2. INVOCATION - None
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Comm. Richard N. Bird
4. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA/EMERGENCY ITEMS
Item 7.K. Request of Commissioner Macht for out -of -county
travel
Item 10 Request for appeal of termination before the Board
by former employee John Halquist --
Item 12.B. Discuss Court ruling on Heritage Village case
S. PROCLAMATION AND PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Retirement Plaque to Albert VanAuken
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Community Services Block Grant Housing
Rehabilitation Program Application
(memorandum dated January 19, 1993)
B. IRC Bid #3065 / Surplus Sale #2
( memorandum dated January 8, 1993 )
C. Final Pay Request and Final Change Order for
Sandridge Golf Club Well Contract
( memorandum dated January 11, 1993 )
D. Vero Beach High School Boys Golf Team Playing
Privileges
(memorandum dated January 14, 1993)
E. Links Design, Inc.
( memorandum dated January 15, 1993 )
BOOK F',g
r JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 1,'o- _ ;
7. CONSENT AGENDA (cont'd. ): PAGE
F. A Resolution of Formal Acceptance of Utility
Easements in Shady Oaks S/D
( memorandum dated January 14, 1993 )
G. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver
for Beachside S/D
( memorandum dated January 18, 1993 )
H. Award Bid #3041 / PC Computers - BCC
(memorandum dated January 19, 1993)
I. Release of Utility Liens
(memorandum dated January 20, 1993)
J. NIMLO Midyear Seminar - Washington, D.C.
( memorandum dated January 20, 1993 )
S. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS AND
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
None
9:05 a.m. 9. PUBLIC ITEMS
A. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEMS
_
I. VISIONS Report
( Report provided separately)
2. Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Self -Evaluation Plan
( memorandum dated January 14, 1993 )
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Shady Oaks S/D Water Service - Resolution III
( memorandum dated January 12, 1993 )
10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S MATTERS
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
None
B. EMERGENCY SERVICES
I. Approval of Renewal of UPS Contract with EPE
Technologies, Inc., for E911 Center
( memorandum dated January 13, 1993 )
2. Approval of Resolution Related to Animal Con-
trol; Amending the Fees, Penalties and Proce-
dures Related to Enforcement of the Animal
Control Ordinance
(memorandum dated January 13, 1993 )
C. GENERAL SERVICES
None
11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS (amt'd. ):
D. LEISURE SERVICES
None
E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
None
F. PERSONNEL
Deferred Compensation
( memorandum dated January 19, 1993 )
G. PUBLIC WORKS
I. Traffic Signalization Design at US #1 / 37th
Street I ntersection
( memorandum dated January 12, 1993 )
2. 3rd Annual Citrus Sunrise Bicycle Classic /
Rotary Club of Vero Beach
(memorandum dated January 12, 1993)
3. Miscellaneous Intersection Improvements,
Phase III / Kimball Lloyd, Inc. Release of
Retainage
( memorandum dated January 18, 1993 )
4. IRC Applic. for Fed. Funding - Beach
Nourishment Proj. Within City of V.B.
(memorandum dated January 20, 1993)
H. UTILITIES
PAGE
1. Regional Landfill Lift Station Change Order #1
(memorandum dated January 14, 1993) _
.2. Proposed Change Orders - Construction of the
C.R. 512 Commercial Node - Water & Wastewater
( memorandum dated January 14, 1993 )
3. Water Main Replacement - Project No. 1
Pineview Pk. S/, Riverbark S/D, l; 15th Ave.
I.R. Bid No. 91-113, Work Authorization No. 7
( memorandum dated December 30, 1992 )
12. COUNTY ATTORNEY
Review of Occupational License Tax
( memorandum dated January 7, 1993 )
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS
A. CHAIRMAN RICHARD N. BIRD
B. VICE CHAIRMAN JOHN W. TIPPIN
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
JAN 26 1993 BOOK V Fr1�C �.dV
JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 PAGE s'26
13. COMMISSIONERS ITEMS (cont'd. ):
C. COMMISSIONER FRAN B. ADAMS
D. COMMISSIONER CAROLYN K. EGGERT
E. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT
14. SPECIAL DISTRICTS
A. EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
1. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of 12/15/92
2. Approval of Camp Dresser E McKee Proposal
for Professional Engineering Services to
Prepare a Contamination Assessment Report
(CAR) for 'Station #3
( memorandum dated January 18, 19931
B. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL DISTRICT
None
15. ADJOURNMENT
PAGE
ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WHICH MAY BE MADE
AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF
THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL WILL BE BASED.
ANYONE WHO NEEDS A SPECIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR THIS MEETING MAY
CONTACT THE COUNTY'S AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
COORDINATOR AT 567-8000 X 408 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF
MEETING.
Tuesday, January 26, 1993
The Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County,
Florida, met in Regular Session at the County Commission Chambers,
1840 25th Street, Vero Beach, Florida on Tuesday, January 26, 1993,
at 9:00 A. M. Present were Richard N. Bird, Chairman; John W.
Tippin, Vice Chairman; Fran B. Adams; Carolyn K. Eggert; and
Kenneth R. Macht. Also present were James E. Chandler, County
Administrator; Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney; and Diane
Albin, Deputy Clerk.
The Chairman called the meeting to order.
Chairman Bird led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDAZEMERGENCY ITEMS
Commissioner Tippin requested the addition as Item 7.K.
permission to attend the Regional Planning Council planning
workshop in Orlando on environmentally sensitive land acquisition.
Administrator Chandler requested the addition as Item 10 a
request for appeal before the Board by John Halquist, an employee
who was terminated.
Attorney Vitunac requested the addition as Item 12.B. a
discussion of last week's Court ruling on the Heritage Village
case.
Chairman Bird requested the deferral of Item 11.G.4. for one
week.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously added and
deferred the above items.
Mom
' JAN 26 1993
BOOK 88 PAGE 662!8 -7
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of a Retirement Plaque by Chairman Bird to Albert
Van Auken was preceded by the following words of recognition:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
ALBERT VAN AUKEN
Albert Van Auken announces his retirement from Indian River
County Board of County Commissioners effective January 28, 1993.
Albert Van Auken, originally from Pennsylvania, has been a resident
of Indian River County since 1961. He was previously employed with
Piper Aircraft as a Mechanic.
Albert Van Auken was hired on January 15, 1963 with the Road &
Bridge Division. He was a Foreman until his position was
reclassified to Assistant Superintendent effective August 16, 1979
and he became Superintendent in February 26, 1981.
Albert Van Auken has seen many changes within Indian River County
in his 30 years of service.
Albert Van Auken has demonstrated positive leadership in his tenure
with the County. A list of Mr. Van Auken's achievements include
construction supervision of over 90 local road petition paving
projects, the County Fairgrounds, numerous County parks, many
County bridges, intersections and sidewalks. He has several
letters of commendation expressing appreciation for jobs well done.
He is regarded as an excellent Superintendent by his supervisor,
Jim Davis, P.E., and is well liked by his staff and other county
employees. Mr. Van Auken will be missed by his fellow employees.
He has unselfishly assisted them over the years with work related
and personal needs.
The Board of County Commissioners wishes to express their
appreciation for the outstanding performance Albert Van Auken has
contributed on behalf of Indian River County. The County
Commissioners wish him the very best in his future endeavors.
Albert Van Auken emotionally thanked the BCC, Administrator
Chandler, department heads, and everyone with whom he worked over
the years, but especially Public Works Director Jim Davis.
Director Jim Davis conveyed that it was a very emotional day
for him also. He felt that Albert Van Auken has been a tremendous
asset to Public Works and cherished their friendship as well as
their working relationship over the past 13 years. He felt that
all of the employees who knew him will miss him very much.
F
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Community Services Block Grant Housing Rehabilitation Program
Application
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 19, 1993:
TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: January 19, 1993 FILE:
Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: H. T. "Sormy" Dean, Directc?zol
General Services
SUBJECT: community Services Block Grant
Housing Rehabilitation Program
Application
FROM: Guy L. Decker, Jr. z4 REFERENCES:
Executive Director
I.R.C. Housing Authority
It is recommended that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by
the County Commission.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITION:
The State of Florida's Department of Community Affairs advised Indian River County
they will accept applications for projects to be funded through the Community Services
Block Grant (CSBG) for local activities to assist low-income individuals. Section 675
(C) (1) (a) through (E), Public Law 97-35, as amended, and Administrative Rule 9B-22,
Florida Administrative Code, provide the criteria for such projects. These grants will
be for a six-month period from April 1, 1993 through September 30, 1993, and the alloca-
tion for Indian River County to cover administrative costs is $6,016. Applications
must be postmarked no later than February 1, 1993.
The Indian River County Housing Authority is the non-profit subgrantee for the
Indian River County Commissioners. The program covered under this grant will provide
rehabilitation consulting services which will activate rehabilitation funding from
governmental sources.
The Farmers Home Administration Section 504 Program provides housing rehabilitation
funds in the form of (1) low-interest loans, (2) loans and grants, and (3) grants to the
low-income elderly owner -occupant. There are approximately 600 owner -occupied substandard
housing units suitable for rehabilitation in Indian River County. Low-income and elderly
families lack the money to make their homes safe and sanitary.
.This program will be targeted in the three most distressed areas of the County in
Sebastian, Wabasso and Winter Beach. We plan on assisting between 8 and 14 low-income
and elderly owners in bringing their homes up to safe and sanitary standards.
ALTERNATIVE AND ANALYSIS:
This is our eleventh funding cycle under legislation passed by Congress which con-
solidated various social programs into the block grant categories for administration by
the State and local government, and funds not applied for from the Community Services
Block Grant Program will be redistributed among counties that make application.
3
JAN 2 6 1 j B 0 0 K 8 8 Pv;F..66'9
e
BOOK 88 PAGUE 630
RECTION AND FUNDING:
We respectfully request the County Commission to authorize its Chairman to execute
the Community Services Block Grant Program Application for submission to Florida's
Department of Community ity Affairs along with the required accompanying Resolution.
This program will bring about improvements in safety and sanitation for approxi-
mately 14 homeowners. The average cost of improvements will be $5,000 per unit. The
$6,016 Grant plus $2,697 of cash and in-kind contribution by the Housing Authority would
be supplemented with abDut $72,000.00 in loans and grants from the Farmers Home
Administration.
This program requires no additional County Funds.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 93-19, authorizing the Chairman of the
Board to execute an application for a housing
rehabilitation program to assist low-income families
as administered by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs, as recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 93- 19
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF,INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD TO EXECUTE AN APPLICATION
FOR A HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM TO ASSIST
LOW-INCOME FAMILIES AS ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE
OF,FLORIDA'S DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.
WHEREAS; the Board of County Commissioners'of Indian River
County has reviewed this proposal and has received the recom-
mendation from the Executive Director of the Indian River County
Housing Authority,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Chairman
and the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners are authorized
to execute the attached Application to the State of Florida's
Department of Community Affairs for a Community Services Block
Grant Program (CSBG).
The foregoing resolution was offered by Commissioner Eggert
who moved its.adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Adams and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
4
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Carolyn R. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 26 day of January, 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By /r
Chairman
ATTEST:
Clerk to the Bo rd C
COPY OF GRANT APPLICATION IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
B. IRC Bid #3065 - Surplus Sale #2
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 8, 1993:
DATE: January 8, 1993
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James S. Chandler, County Administrator
H.T. "Sonny" Dean, Director
Department of General Servic A
FROM Fran Boynton Powell, Purchasing Manager
SUBJ: IRC Bid 03065/Surplus Sale 02
BACKGROUND:
The following equipment (attached sheet) has been declared surplus to
the needs of Indian River County.
5
BOOK 00 F'AH. Gil
JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 PAGE 632
ANALYSIS:
Staff recommends that authority be granted by the Board of County
Commissioners to declare the above surplus and authorize its sale.
FUNDING:
The monies received from this sale will be returned to the appropriate
accounts.
This will be placed on the Surplus Property Sale open to the public as
per State Statutes.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
staff recommendation that the property listed below
be declared surplus and sold at a surplus property
sale open to the public in accordance with State
Statutes.
Surplus Items Having No Asset Numbers:
Fire Department
1. G.E. Eastron (RS -7A) Encoder
2. G.E. Personal Radio Desk Charger
3. G.E. Radio
4. Federal Siren (Director)
5. G.E. Custom MVP Radio
6. Federal Siren - (Director)
7. G.E. Speaker
S. G.E. Personal Radio Desk Charger
9. Motorola Speaker
10. Shinwa Paper Charger
11. Motorola Hand Held Radio Charger
12. Door -Light -Horn Station Pager
13. Comm. specialist PE -100 Pager Radio Encoder
14. Motorola Pager Charger
15. Motorola Maxar Radio
16. Motorola Speaker
17. Motorola Convertacom Radio Charger (Hand Held)
18. G.E. Personal Radio Desk Charger
19. G.E. Personal Radio Charger Standard
20. G.E. Pager Charger
21. Motorola Minitor Pager
22. Motorola Charger
23. Regency Micro-com Pager Charger
24. Motorola (Power Amplifier)
25. Telephone (3 Channels)
26. G.E. Rechargeable Batteries
27. Regency (Alert) Pager
28. Southern VP Siren
29. Monipage Shinwa Pager
30. King Marine Radio (Hand -Held)
31. Ommicron Recorder
32. Shinwa Pager Charger
Utilities Department
1. Onan Transfer Switch - 600 AMPS
2. Onan Transfer Switch - 600 V.A.C.
3. 60 H.P. U.S. Motor
4. Goulds Pump - 150 H.P. (2)
5. Goulds Pump- 125 H.P. (2)
6
a
I
R
v
c�
T
i
I`:
e
01/19/93 11iO3t28
NUMBER NUMBER MGNT CODE OF ASSET
004764
004768
3
004930
004973
007033
007356
007357
AAS
007467
007469
007476
007532
997843-
007842
007912
008544
008544
008546
008559
008561
008890
008905
009377
009379
009733
010939
011020
009470
009734
008872
008465
008542
008548
008550
000000
1340
DISK DRIVE
000000
1340
IBM DISPLAYWRITER CPU
AUTO -DIAL -- — ---
000000
000000
-
1260
DEC PRINTER
000000
1500
PRINTER 1200LPM
r
000000
1340
1110
PRINTER
CANON ELECTRONIC TYPEWRITER
000000
1500
KODAK CAR INTERFACE
000000
1500
DISPLAY WRITER
000000
1040
IBM DISK DRIVES
19M DISK BRIVES
000000
000000
1500
:1040,
IBM DISK DRIVES
000000
1040
IBM DISPLAYWRITER CPU
000000
1240
1240
ZBM 01911 DRIVES
IBM PRINTER/FEEDER
000020
1040
IBM DISPLAYWRITER CPU.
TYPE AND !NTERFAM
000009
000000
1230
1230
eANGN AP40
CANON VP2000 WORD PROCESSOR
000000
1280
GE MOBILE
000000
000010
1500
1500
990,TAPE DRIVE
IDP WHTESTONE II CPU SYS UPGRA
000020
1500
IDP MINIMEG 8MB CACHE MEMORY
FUji DISK DRIVE
000000
000000
1500
1500
FUJI DISK DRIVE
000000
I500
.1500
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
WYSE VlBEG TERIII14AL
000000
000000
1500
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
000000
1500
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
VIBEG TERMINAL
000000
1500
1500
WYSE
CENTRONICS 455 LINEWRITER
000000
1500
FUJITSU M2351A EAGLE DISK DRV
VIDES TERMINAL
000000
000000
1500
1500
WYSE WV50
WYSE - WY50 VIDEO TERMINAL
000002
1210
EMULATION KIT 02910
EAGLE BISK DRIVE
098609
000000
1500
1215
FUjiTSU
PANASONIC JETWRITER TYPEWRITER
0�00000�/0-'�"
/
..,----',A4520
1219
ADDS CRT 6 KEY
lN8 t ASCII_ _PRINTERF8R BIDS
dandba"
000006
1110
MAA
IBM SYS/2 PC COLOR DISPLAY
000006
1210
FRO-PRINTER-WHEELWRITER
000006
1277
SPEAKER ON FIRE TRUCK
000006
4
1285
PE100 PAGING ENCODER
000006
1500
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
000006
1500
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
000006 1500 WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
1
1
PAGE 1
.---.-ASSET-VALUE----
SERIAL'NUMBER---C-OMMENT----•-RE£-FL
OF ASSET
-- -- - ' ---931 w50 _
-- 50994023-
1.624.00
0068047
CINDY
4II518e00
0062544
CINDY
—.- - -- 595400-
----440503 ------
----------
1.036.75
PN88186
COMPUTER P
23,400.00
12-S12419-
SURPLUS
2:00 00 -
- - - ----
-
1,875.30
012013179
2t615e00
1372
5139-5
SURPLUS
2,525.00
3.848.00
6580-2600D
SURPLUS
1#596.00
6360-2600D
2600D
SPARE
SURPLUS
1,596.00
1#291.00
6360
6360-26-00
JAN
3#312.00
6580-26-00
0-6 00
SPARE
FR 1700
ip6ovfoo
4,511.00
6360
5218-11-00
FR 1700
2,318.80
6580-26-00
82027740
SPARE
1,065.93
1.564.00
E1201434V
608.00
5356513
STA 1
SURPLUS
6,525.00
14#000.00
599494
869
SURPLUS
11,050.00
M
1173
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
13,875.00
13.875.00
29:725
29725
SURPLUS
600.00
14096
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
600.00
600.00
52982
50636
SURPLUS
600.00
-0
47992
SURPLUS
864RPLUS
7,350.00
i3866 -
2306384
SURPLUS
15,375.00
JP 101120
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
550,00
550.00
1078410
1078005
SURPLUS
400
FR 1210
SURPLUS
9,000.00
774.33
NOT vlSxBL
FR 1285 AT -
e00
324520
RYANWOOD
LEFT G ER
08
.o0
8050256
400
2719849
000
CP1008
SCF STA 1
000
BACKROOM
SURP6US
000
V838048
15815
SURPLUS
400
52978
SURPLUS
.08
48618—
SmP6d6
400
52996
SURPLUS
1
1
1
G
01/19/93
iitO3t28
PAGE 2
=
e NUMBER
NUMBER
MONT CODE
OF ASSET
OF ASSET
008552
000006
1500
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
.00
16054
SURPLUS
• 008554
000006
00000;s
1:500
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
.00
48623
SURPLUS0005w
"
a
008556
000006
1000
1500
wyt*t-- VIDEO I-ERMINAt
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
#00
.00
14346
SURPLUS
SURPLUS
.
a 008564
000006
1500
WYSE VIDEO TERMINAL
•00
48606
SURPLUS
n
a 009399
000006
1520
LINK DISPLAY TERMINAL AMBER
•00
121485
RYANWOOD
a 009994
000006
000006
1520
WYSE CRT
000
0331009343
RYANWOOD
a %JJL%PJUZ
J
4.00
8851430
KTRNWOUU
n 010110
000006
1520
LATHEM TIME CLOCK
000
8851802
RYANWOOD
a; 008985
000006
1600
DOUBLE FACE READ/STUDY CARRELL
000
NONE
SURPLUS
a 008969
000006
;,.4$040 -;SCM
XD 7000 ELECTRIC T/W
•00
5LEF113533
OENEOLOGY
m
008971 '7000006,
%mosy
1640
SCM XD 7000 ELECTRIC T/W
,00
5LEF113532
MEDIA
rz
a 008974
wriocos
000006
1840
1640
Sum XD ?00 170
SCM XD 7000 ELECTRIC T/W
too
.00
mtEF112345
8324723
MEDIA
MEDIA
a
009642
000006
1640
SC—XD 7000 ELECTRIC T/W
.00
1133433
ADMIN WORK
"
o
r
TOTAL
160.562.61
es
s
s
ei
>s
a
u
>r
�
a
a
a
a
s
n
a
o
a
a
a49
'
a
M
e
u
. a
4
co
O
Cn
OtlJ
G7
:Tl
I
al -
U
PAGE 3
BER T -------RECD
OF ASSET
s • 9eJ@KH 21
5x580.00 6MD0159BWO NO TAG
12,746.00 9A319503 FROM 1390
tB48W t 2P8E— —F :;
28.000.00 CCE666V145 TANKER 30
20,667.00 F61DCL6193 STATION 4
2P47 900 STA 4
TOTAL 84,529.04
1
01/19/93 11203128
s
As
NUMBER
SEQUENeE
NUMBER
FLEET
MGNT.
CODE
OF ASSET
4
003713
r
000000
180
1120
1981
DATSUN NISSAN 1/2 TON
a
003764
004383
000000
000000
174
204
1420
1981
MF DIESEL TRACTOR
t0
008078
000000
556
1420.
1280
t982
1976
080SE Dt5O RAMeHARSER
CHEVY TANKER
to
008091
000000
518
1300
1971
FORD F600 TANKER
al -
U
PAGE 3
BER T -------RECD
OF ASSET
s • 9eJ@KH 21
5x580.00 6MD0159BWO NO TAG
12,746.00 9A319503 FROM 1390
tB48W t 2P8E— —F :;
28.000.00 CCE666V145 TANKER 30
20,667.00 F61DCL6193 STATION 4
2P47 900 STA 4
TOTAL 84,529.04
1
�
Fr -
JA IV
0
_I
BOOK 88 PAGE 636
C. Change Order and Final Pay Request for Sandridge Golf Club Well
Contract
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 11, 1993:
DATE: JANUARY 11, 1993
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: FINAL PAY REQUEST AND FIN CHANGE ORDER FOR SANDRIDGE
GOLF CLUB WELL NT T�
FROM: BOB KOMARINET TOR OF GOLF
BACKGROUND
On May 12, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners awarded the aforementioned project to Drilling
Services, Inc. in the amount of $22,998.00. We have now
completed this project and are ready to make final payment to the
contractor.
ANALYSIS
The original contract amount for the project was $22,998.00. The
proposed change order (see attached) decreases the contract
amount by $'862.03 and was necessitated to facilitate proper
Installation of the well. By approval of this change order, the
contract amount is approximately 3.3% under the original awarded
cost. The final contract cost is $22,133.97
RECOMMENDATION :.
The staff of the Department of- Sandridge Golf Club recommends
that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached
Change Order No. 1 and final pay request to Drilling Services,
Inc. in the amount of $ 5,932.73. -
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order No. 1 and final payment to Driveways,
Inc. in the amount of $5,932.73, as recommended by
staff.
COPY OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
AND FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
10
D. Vero Beach High School Boys' Golf Team Playing Privileges
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 14, 1993:
DATE: JANUARY 14, 1993
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUNTY
SUBJECT: VERO BEACH HIGH S'C OOL' BO
FROM: BOB KOMARINETZ
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
STRATOR
GOLF TEAM PLAYING PRIVILEGES
GOLF
THE VERO BEACH HIGH SCHOOL BOYS GOLF TEAM ARE REQUESTING THE USE
OF SANDRIDGE GOLF CLUB FOR THERE MATCHES AND PRACTICE SESSIONS
FOR 1993. I HAVE ATTACHED A LETTER OF REQUEST FROM COACH WAYNE
GRIFFITH.
RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE TO
VERO BEACH HIGH SCHOOL BOYS GOLF TEAM THE USE OF THE FACILITIES
AT THE SANDRIDGE GOLF CLUB.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
use of the facilities at the Sandridge Golf Club by
the Vero Beach High School Boys' Golf Team, as
recommended by staff.
E. Final Payment to Links Design Inc. - Second 18 at Sandridge
Golf Club.
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 15, 1993:
DATE: JANUARY 15,.1993
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER, COUN ADMINISTRATOR
.SUBJECT: LINKS DESIGN, INC.
FROM: BOB KOMARINETZ4?
TOR OF GOLF
BACKGROUND
Links Design, Inc. is under contract to design the second 18 at
Sandridge Golf Club. The golf course is completed and they are
requesting final payment for their services..
ANALYSIS
The original contract was not to exceed the lesser of $169,704.00
or 8% of the construction cost and under Article #3 of contract
-- Links Design was to be paid up $6,500.00 for travel expenses.
The total original budget $176,204.00.
L_ JAN 261993
BOOK 88 PAF;
JAS 26
1993 BOOK 88 PAGE 38,
The total construction cost was $2,059,098.00 (see attached
Invoices) equaling $164,727.85. The total expense including
travel was $5,165.73. The total amount paid and due to Links
Design $169,893.58 which is 2.8% or $6,310.42 under original
contract: Links Design has been paid to date $166,186.35.
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioner to approve the
final payment of $3,707.23 to Links Design, Inc. (Per attached
Invoice).— `.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
final payment in the amount of $3,707.23 to Links
Design, Inc., as recommended by staff.
COPY OF FINAL INVOICE IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
F. A Resolution of Formal Acceptance of Utility Easements in Shady
Oaks Subdivision
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 14, 1993:
DATE: JANUARY 14, 1993
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATO
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO X
DIRECTOR OF UTILI SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHAST
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF AS PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF ILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF FORMAL ACCEPTANCE OF UTILITY
EASEMENTS IN SHADY OARS SUBDIVISION
BACKGROUND
On January 5, 1993, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved Resolution I (93-4) and Resolution II (93-5),
Which contained the preliminary assessment roll and set the date of
the public hearing for the above -referenced subdivision.
ANALYSIS
In connection with the Department of Utility Services' installing
water lines for the Shady Oaks Subdivision, it is necessary that the
County formally accept the utility easements in accordance with the
subdivision plat dedication.
- The Department of Utility Services recommends that the Board of
County Commissioners approve and authorize the chairman to sign the
attached resolution accepting the necessary utility easements.
12
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously
adopted Resolution,93-20, formally accepting utility
easements in Shady Oaks Subdivision, as recommended
by staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 93- 20
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, FORMALLY ACCEPTING UTILITY
EASEMENTS IN SHADY OAKS SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS, Indian River County is in the process of installing water
lines in Shady Oaks Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, in connection with this project, it is necessary for the
County to install its water lines in certain . utility easements in Shady Oaks
Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 90, Public Records of Indian
River County, Florida;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
OF INDIAN
RIVER
COUNTY,
FLORIDA,
that the Board
hereby formally
accepts the
utility
easements,
as offered
to the County,
shown on the plat of the above -referenced subdivision.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman- thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 26 day of January 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
.-Attest:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
-�- --- � -
c..
By
Richard N. Bird
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk Chairman
' r
13
aooK
JAN 261991 F.,�c :ski
BOOK 88 F'AGE 640
G. Request for Floodplain Cut and Fill Balance Waiver for
Beachside Subdivision.
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 18, 1993:
To: James Chandler
County Administratfl�
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.
Public Works Direc
and
Roger D. Cain, P.E
County Engineer
FROM: David B. Cox, P. E.'W-
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for Floodplain Cut and
Beachside Subdivision
Fill Balance Waiver for
DATE: January 18, 1993 _ CONSENT AGENDA
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
Knight, McGuire & Associates, Inc., on behalf of Legend Building &
Drywall, Inc., developers -of Beachside Subdivision, is requesting
a waiver of the cut and fill balance requirement of Section
930.07(2)(d) of the Stormwater,Management and Flood Protection
Ordinance. Beachside Subdivision received preliminary plat
approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission on October 22, 1992.
The project is located on S.R. A -1-A in Government Lot 1, Section
34, Township 33 south, Range 40 east, adjacent to the south
property line of Ocean Oaks Subdivision, approximately two miles
north of the St. Lucie County line. The special'flood hazard areas
inundated by the 100 year flood -on this site include Zones VE, AO
and AE with base flood elevations of 15 and 5 FT. N.G.V.D. The
ten year Stillwater elevation for the Indian River established in
the May 4, 1989 F.E.M.A. Flood Insurance Study is 2.7 FT.N.G.V.D.
The proposed displacement of the floodplain below 4.0 FT. N.G.V.D.
for which a waiver is requested is estimated as 500 cubic yards by
the applicant's engineer in the attached letter dated December 11,
1992.-
ALTERNATIVES
992.-
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The project meets the cut and fill balance waiver criteria provided
in Section 930.07(2)(d)1. of being situated in an estuarine
environment within the 100 year floodplain along the Indian River
and in staff's opinion it appears- that all other Stormwater.
Management and Flood Protection Ordinance requirements can be met
without adverse impact on other lands in the estuarine environment.
S.J.R.W.M.D. has received an application. for construction of the
stormwater quality treatment system and indicated verbally that the
plans should not require any substantial.redesign to be approved.
Approval of the Land Development Permit is pending the cut and fill
waiver request, issuance of S.J.R.W.M.D., F.D.0.T.I F.D.E.R. water
and sewer, City of Vero Beach Utilities Construction, F.D.N.R. dune
walkover, County Land Clearing and Tree Removal permits, and
U.S.F.W.S. approval of the Beach Mouse habitat preservation plan.
14
Alternative No. 1
- Approve the cut and fill balance waiver request.
Alternative No. 2
Deny the waiver request and require re -design to accomplish an on-
site balance of cut and fill.
Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. I,
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the request for floodplain cut and fill balance
waiver for Beachside Subdivision, as recommended by
staff.
H. Award Bid #3041 - PC Computers - BCC
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 18, 1993:
DATE: January 19, 1993
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
THRU: James E. Chandler, -County
Admin strator-
H.T. „Sonny" Dean,
dMARI
Director
Department of General
Servicdw
FROM: Fran Boynton Powell, -Purchasing Manag
SUBJ: Award Bid 03041/PC
Computers
Board of
County Commissioners
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Bid Opening Date:
November 18, 1992
Advertising Dates:
November 4, 11, 1992
Specifications Mailed To:
Seven (7) Vendors
Replies:
Five (5) Vendors
VENDOR
BID TABULATION
Vetrol Data Systems
$ 81015.00
Vero Beach, FL
Compuadd
$ 8,257.09
Melbourne, FL
Progressive Data
$ 8,563.00
Vero Beach, FL
Computer & Peripheral Warehouse $ 10,421.00
Deerfield Beach, FL
Professional Computer Service
$ 10,470.00
Vero Beach, FL
15
JAN 1993 BOOK 88F� ,F ,
eooK 88 642
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID: $ 80015.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS: B.C.C. Operations Office Furniture and
Equipment Account*
BUDGETED AMOUNT:
RECOMMENDATION:
$ 8,833.00
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Vetrol Data
Systems as the lowest, most responsive and responsible
bidder meeting specifications as set forth in the
Invitation to Bid.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously awarded
Bid #3041 to Vetrol Data Systems for purchase of
four PC computers for County Commission offices in
the amount of $8,015.00, as recommended by staff.
I. Release of Utility Liens
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 20, 1993:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AuL A )ftet�
FROM: Lea R. Heller, CLA, County Attorney's Office
DATE: January 20, 1993
RE: RELEASE OF UTILITY LIENS
The attached lien releases are in proper form for the Board of County
Commissioners to Authorize the Chairman to sign them so that they can
be recorded. They are as follows:
(1) Satisfactions of Impact Fee Extension
in the names of :
BRANIGAN
CRANE
FLYNN
ENGLAND
FOLEY
HOWARD
JONES (LORETTA & SAMMIE LEE SR.)
MURDOCK
PHILLIPS
SHERMAN
REQUEST: The Board approve the documents and authorize the
Chairman to sign them.
16
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the releases of utility liens as listed above.
SAID SATISFACTIONS OF IMPACT FEE EXTENSIONS
ARE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
J. Auproval of Out -of -State Travel - National Institute of
Municipal Law Officers Midyear Seminar - Washington D.C.
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 20, 1993:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: January 20, 1993
RE: NIMLO MIDYEAR SEMINAR - Washington, D.C.
I request permission from the Board to attend the annual midyear
meeting of the nation's county and city attorneys sponsored by the
National Institute of Municipal Law Officers. The seminar is scheduled
from April 18 through 20, 1993, and was included in our office's
1992-93 fiscal year budget.
REQUEST: Board approval for County Attorney's attendance at this
seminar.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized
out-of-state travel for Attorney Vitunac to attend
the annual midyear seminar of -the National Institute
of Municipal Law Officers in Washington, D.C. from
April 18 through 20, 1993.
17
BOOK 88 PAGE 643
JAN 261993
I
JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 PAGE 644
K. Approval of Out -of -County Travel for Commissioner Macht to
Attend a Workshop on Environmentally Sensitive Land Conservation
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously authorized
out -of -county travel for Commissioner Macht and
Environmental Planning Chief Roland DeBlois to
attend a one -day workshop on environmentally
sensitive land conservation in Orlando, Florida on
March 4., 1993.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - VISIONS REPORT
Eric Wetzig from the steering committee distributed copies of
a report on the Visions workshop held October 9-10, 1992, in which
about 150 County residents participated. Mr. Wetzig explained that
the first portion of the booklet provides a general overview and
the pages in the back provide detailed information in the form of
copies of actual flip chart comments made by participants.
Chairman Bird attended several of the preliminary sessions and
was impressed by the tremendous number of intelligent, dedicated
local people, representing a cross-section of the County, who
volunteered their time on a weekend to participate in the workshop.
He also praised County staff members for participating in the
workshop on their own time and was impressed with the extent of
staff's knowledge.
Mr. Wetzig related that it was apparent from comments in the
report that the participants felt the quality of employees of the
County as well as municipalities within the County is outstanding.
The uniform opinion was that the community is a place that has
dedicated ated public servants who care about the communitY, even though
g
citizens may agree '
y gr a or disagree about individual decisions that are
made. However, the overall view is that there is a need for growth
and economic development.
Chairman Bird asked Mr. Wetzig if the workshops will be held
annually. Mr. Wetzig explained that the committee is eager to
schedule another workshop but before doing so, they would like the
Board . to review the report and make recommendations as to the focus
of the next workshop. The initial workshop was broad-based and
covered a lot of topics, and the committee would like to see the
next workshop cover one or two specific areas in depth.
Commissioner Tippin agreed that the next workshop should
concentrate on specific areas, and he indicated that there is
18
enough information in the report to keep the Board busy for an
extended period of time.
Chairman Bird noted that the Visions report discusses a number
of topics. Since individual Commissioners specialize in various
facets of County government through the committees on which they
serve, it would be appropriate for each Commissioner to read the
report, see how the comments pertain to a particular committee, and
share those thoughts with that committee.
Commissioner Macht suggested that each Commissioner determine
his or her areas of responsibility and notify the appropriate
individuals as to when their committees meet. Interested persons
could develop their input prior to the meeting and participate in
the process. For example, participants who suggested setting up a
children's council could attend the Children's Service Advisory
Committee meetings, which are held once a month on a Thursday.
Other examples are the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee and the
Economic Development Committee. He noted that a number of
participants requested that regular Board meetings be held during
evening hours and be televised. This idea was previously voted
down by the Board and probably warrants further discussion. He
stressed that the Board needs to communicate to' the workshop
participants that we appreciate their work, applaud their insight,
and are ready to get to work on each of these items. He pointed
out that a lot of the issues have already been addressed by the
County.
Commissioner Eggert commented that communication seems to be
a problem because people are not aware of a lot of projects and
activities currently under way in the County. Further, a statement
was made in the Visions report that unincorporated areas are not
represented when the purpose of the BCC is to represent
unincorporated areas. She thought that it would be helpful if the
Board had a list of the names of the participants on the various
teams, and Mr. Wetzig indicated he could -provide that information
to the Board.
Commissioner Macht felt that the public also needs to be made
aware of evening recreational programs that are available to youth,
such as Teens United For Fun (T.U.F.F.). Other programs failed for
lack of participation because the public was not aware of them.
The Board needs to find ways to get information to the public.
Mr. Wetzig noted that a workshop could be held for the purpose
of communicating with the citizenry.
19
BOOK �� PGJA N 6 t ;
BOOK 88 PAGE 646 -1
Chairman Bird thanked the workshop participants, accepted the
report, and conveyed that the Board will take the information to
heart, work with it and communicate back with the participants, and
hopefully a lot of good will evolve out of it.
COPY OF THE VISIONS REPORT IS ON FILE
IN THE COUNTY COMMISSION LIBRARY
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF-
EVALUATION PLAN
Administrator Chandler commented from the following memo dated
January 14, 1993:
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: January14, 1993 FILE:
Through: James Chandler �
County AdministralEore
Americans With Disabilities
SUBJECT: Act ( ADA) Self -Evaluation Plan
FROM:Asst yto coup y Admin. REFERENCES:
The county is required by 28 CFR, Part 35, Section 35.105 to prepare a
self-evaluation plan to evaluate the county's current services, policies, and
programs to identify and correct those which do not comply with this law. All
of the policies and programs that are inconsistent with the Act and subsequently
identified in this plan must be corrected immediately with remedial action.
In preparing this self-evaluation plan, county staff focused on the areas outlined
In the ADA Title II Technical Assistance Manual.
After the plan was prepared, the Administrator's office, as required by this
federal law, conducted a public workshop to receive and take into consideration
comments from disabled individuals and organizations and other interested
citizens. A brief synopsis of the workshop Is Included in the plan.
County staff recommends that the Board approve this self-evaluation plan and
authorize staff to make additions, deletions, and clarifications to the plan as the
need arises.
Administrator Chandler reported that over the past year staff
has developed various programs and procedures in order to conform
with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Randy Dowling, Assistant to the County Administrator, was named ADA
coordinator, a transition plan was presented to the Board in
Biu
a � �
September, and the plan is now being implemented. Lines of
communication have been opened with various individuals and
organizations. The final element necessary to conform to the
requirements of the ADA is the Self -Evaluation Plan. Mr. Dowling
and staff members from various departments prepared the self-
evaluation plan and a public workshop was held on January 14 to
present the plan to interested parties, and the plan is now being
presented to the Board. The programs and policies will continue to
be evaluated as part of an ongoing process.
Chairman Bird announced that this is a public discussion item
and asked if anyone wished to be heard.
There being none, he closed the public discussion.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the ADA Self -Evaluation Plan and authorized staff to
make additions, deletions, and clarifications to the
plan as the need arises, as recommended by staff.
PLAN IS ON FILE
IN THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR"S OFFICE
PUBLIC BEARING - BRADY OARS SUBDIVISION WATER SERVICE - RESOLUTION
III
The hour of 9:05 o'clock A. M. having passed, the County
Attorney announced that this public hearing has been properly
advertised as follows:
21
L_ JAN 26 1993 Boa 88 FAIJF 64.E
J AN 2 6, 1993 B0®K 88 F•AGE 648
VERO BEACH PRESS -JOURNAL
Published Daily
Vero Beach, Indian River County. Florida
COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER: STATE OF FLORIDA
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared J. J. Schumann, Jr. who on oath
says that he is Business Manager of the Vero Beach Press•Journal, a daily newspaper published
at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being
In the / Court, was pub.
Ilshed in said newspaper In the Issues of 641
Affiant further says that the said Vero Beach Press -Journal is a newspaper published at
Vero Beach, in said Indian River County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore
been continuously published In said Indian River County, Florida, each daily and has been
entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Vero Beach, In said Indian River Coun-
ty, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of
advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this
advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this�. day o A.O. 19,�_
q -I, (Business Manager)
/
(SEAL)
The NOTICE'""""' "•
C=4 CMV*Wwm of Indian
River � Provides notbe of
PUBLIC NG SdedUled for 9:05 A.M. on
Tuesday, January 28, 1993, to d�a,se a
resolute relating to a S�PEtCvIAL ASSESS
Urn PROJECT in Un River SHAG for the Installation
of WATER SERVICE IN Y OAKS SUBDryI.
SION (EAST OF 43RD AVENUE AND SOUTH OF
OSLO ROAD) and Providing for special ass
Dens to be made of record m Its M*001108 to be
Anyone
ft made May wish Iwo need eolsion m"
to eymn
veftft em at the Wpoeedlags wlti�testimony and evi�N wtich
neft qVW Is based.
Anyone who needs a(( sPedal aocammo tfoa for
twi vWth
DA) Cowdnitor at 567
8000, ExL 408, at 48 hotn in admm at the-
Mae"
Jan.1T,1s.1993 f'?'f"t 884430
Assessment Projects Manager James Chastain commented from the
following memo dated January 12, 1993:
DATE: JANUARY 12, 1993
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PI
DIRECTOR OF UTI I SERVICES
PREPARED JAMES D. CHASTAA
AND STAFFED MANAGER OF ASS PROJECTS
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: SHADY OAKS SUBDIVISION WATER SERVICE
PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION III
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -92 -19 -DS
BACKGROUND
On January 5, 1993, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved Resolution I (93-4) and Resolution II (93-5).
Resolution I contained the preliminary assessment roll describing the
project and cost. Resolution II set the date of the public hearing
for the subject project. Property owners have been notified of the
public hearing by certified mail. Resolution I (93-4) was published
in the Vero Beach Press Journal on January 11, 1993. (See attached
agenda item and minutes of the above meeting.)
22
ANALYSIS
Design of the water distribution system is complete. An
informational meeting was held with the property owners on January
12, 1993. The project will serve 50 platted lots. Approval of the
attached Resolution III will confirm and approve the preliminary
assessment.
The attached map displays the area to benefit from the assessment
project. The total estimated cost to be assessed is $111,699.92.
The projected cost per square foot is $0.084649. This project is to
be paid through the assessment of property owners along the proposed
water line route. In the interim, financing will be through the use
of impact fee funds.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the"
Board of County Commissioners approve Resolution III, which affirms
the preliminary assessment on the subject project.
The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone
wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, he closed the
public hearing.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 93-21, confirming the special assessments
in connection with a water main extension to Shady
Oaks Subdivision, east of 43rd Avenue and south of
Oslo Road, and providing for special assessment
liens to be made of record, as recommended by staff.
RECORD VERIFIEd
JEFFREY K. BARTON
CLERK CIRCUIT COURT
RESOLUTION NO. 93-1 INDIAN RIVER CO., FLA
23
BOOK 88 P `, G E 6T j
A RESOLUTION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONFIRMING
THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH A WATER MAIN
,
EXTENSION TO SHADY OARS SUBDIVISION, EAST OF 43RD AVENUE_
AND SOUTH OF OSLO ROAD, AND PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT LIENS TO BE MADE OF RECORD.
e d e N
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
th
has, byResolutionNo. 93-4, adopted January 5, 1993, determined
to make
m
•d ,y U
special assessments against certain properties to be serviced by
a water
main extension of the County to Shady Oaks Subdivision, east
of 43rd
,
1 # vOr?.
Avenue and South of Oslo Road; and
23
BOOK 88 P `, G E 6T j
rp'--JAN 26 j993
BOOK 88 [Acr 650
RESOLUTION NO. 93- 21
WHEREAS, said resolution described the manner in which said special
assessments shall be made and how said special assessments are to be
paid; and
WHEREAS, the resolution was published on January 11, 1993, as
required by Section 206.04, Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County
passed Resolution No. 93-5, on January 5, 1993, -which set a time and
place for a public hearing at which the owners of the properties to be
assessed and other interested persons would have the chance to be heard
as to any and all complaints as to said project and said special
assessments, and for the Board to act as required by Section 206.07,
Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of the public hearing was
published in the Press Journal Newspaper on Monday, January 11, 1993,
and Monday,•
January 18, 1993{ f,�y,(twice one week art the last being at
least one week prior to the. hearing), as required by Section 206.06,
-Indian River County Code; and
WHEREAS, the land owners of record were mailed notices at least ten
days prior to the hearing, as required by Section 206.06, Indian River
County Code; and
WHEREAS, the Board of 'County Commissioners of Indian River County
on Tuesday, January .26, 1993;.at:.9:05 a.m. conducted.the public hearing
with regard to the special assessments,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONXR8
OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, as follows:
--- 1. The special assessments shown on the attached assessment roll are
hereby confirmed and approved, and shall remain legal, valid, and
binding first liens against the properties alseessed until paid in
full.
24
2.
The County will record the special assessments and this resolution,
which describes the properties assessed and 'the amounts of the
special assessments, on the public records, which shall constitute
prima facie evidence of the validity of the special assessments.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner Eggert ,
and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Adams , and, upon being
put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Vice Chairman John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed and
adopted this 26th day of January, 1993.
r`4. -Jef $rey 'K : * E a _ton, Clerk
' r=�tar.c' s':'.'';.'• �� r. x �t•`' � / 1/ 1.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY/
Richard N. Bird
Chairman
RESOLUTION WITH ASSESSMENT ROLL ATTACHED
IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
REQUEST FOR APPEAL OF TERMINATION BEFORE THE BOARD BY FORMER
EMPLOYEE JOHN HALOUIST
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 20, 1993:
25
A 2 99 BOOK �� F,,� 651
Ali
93
JAS 26 19�e�
BOOK 88f'AGr 65.2.,
TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: January 20, 1993 FILE:
SUBJECT: John Halquist Appeal
aures E. Chandler
FRO •County Administrator REFERENCES:
Attached is a request for a Board hearing of an appeal of a employee
termination. At the January 26, 1993 meeting, it is requested the Board set a
date and time for the hearing.
Administrator Chandler estimated that the hearing will take
approximately three hours.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously set a
hearing date of February 3, 1993 at 9:00 A.M. for
the appeal of the termination of John Halquist.
APPROVAL OF RENEWAL OF UPS CONTRACT WITH EPE TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR
E911 CENTER
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 13, 1993:
TO: Board of County Commissioner`s
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Department of Emergency Services
DATE: January 13, 1993
SUBJECT: Approval of Renewal of UPS Contract with
EPE Technologies, Inc., for E911 Center
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein
be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
at the next scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS:
The service agreement with EPE Technologies for scheduled and
remedial maintenance for the uninterrupted power supply (UPS)
equipment at the E911 Communications Center is due for renewal at
this time. The company has fulfilled contract commitments over the
26
past year and service has been very satisfactory. No failure of
the equipment has been experienced and staff feels this is largely
due to the preventative maintenance program provided in the
contract.
Funding for renewal of the contract was budgeted in this fiscal
year in the amount of $7,822. This figure includes the final
payment of $1,500 for the spare parts kit which is on site.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS: '
The spare parts kit is beneficial to the county is that needed
repairs on the UPS system could be completed on site quickly
without having to wait for parts to, be flown in from one of the
company parts depots.
RECOM11ENDATION :
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve renewal
of the EPE Maintenance Agreement in the amount of $7,822 which
includes the final payment of $1,500 on the spare parts kit.
Staff also recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to
execute the necessary documents to formalize the agreement.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the renewal of the maintenance agreement with EPE
Technologies, Inc., in the amount of $7,822, which
includes a final payment of $1,500 on the spare
parts kit, as recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION RELATED TO ANIMAL CONTROL• AMENDING THE
FEES, PENALTIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO ENFORCEMENT OF THE ANIMAL
CONTROL ORDINANCE
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 13, 1993:
27
JAN 2 6 -1993 ROOK 88 PAGE 6 53
I JAN 2s 1993
TO: Board of County Commissioners
THROUGH: Jim Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Doug Wright, Director
Emergency Services
DATE: January 13, 1993
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Related to Animal
Control; Amending the Fees, Penalties and
Procedures Related to Enforcement of the
Animal Control Ordinance
BOOK 88 PAGt 654 -7
It is respectfully requested that the information contained herein be
given formal consideration by the Board• of County Commissioners at
the next regular scheduled meeting.
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The fees, penalties and procedures established in Resolution 92-74
have been revised in two areas of the proposed resolution now before
the Board for consideration.
The first proposed change is in Section 2, subsection c, entitled
"Redemption Penalties in addition to Impoundment Fees," the first
offense has been changed to a non -fee basis or a waiver. This change
is predicated on a request by Animal Control and the Humane Society
in an effort to enhance our outreach programs to help educate pet
owners to be responsible for their pets.
The second proposed change is not really a change, but rather a
correction. When Resolution 92-74 was prepared, the redemption
penalty fee amount specified in Section 21 subsection c, was
incorrectly transcribed. These fee amounts were correctly stated in
Resolution 91-57 approved by the Board on May 7, 1991, and these are
the same amounts that are requested -for approval now by the Board.
The correct redemption penalty amounts should be $15.00 for the first
recognized offense; $30.00 for a second offense; and $60.00 for any
third or subsequent offense, rather than the incorrect amounts of
$30.00, $60.00, and $100.00 respectively.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
The Division of Animal Control and the Humane Society feel the change
proposed regarding the waiver for the first offense in terms of
redemption penalty charges will help to educate the pet owners to
maintain control of their pets and not allow them to roam at large.
It will allow for only an impoundment fee to be charged for first
offenders without an additional redemption penalty. It is felt that
charging both for first offenders would escalate the civil penalty to
the point that some citizens might not be financially able to
retrieve their pets from the Humane Society.
--- RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the
proposed Resolution which provides for a redemption penalty fee
waiver for first offenders and provides the correct amounts of
$15.00, $30.00, and $60.000, in terms of redemption penalties for
first, second and third or subsequent offenses, after an initial
waiver has been granted.
28
a � �
ON MOTION by Commissioner Macht, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously adopted
Resolution 93-22, amending the fees, penalties and
procedures related to the enforcement of the animal
control ordinance, as recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION 93-,2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE FEES,
PENALTIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE
ENFORCEMENT OF THE ANIMAL CONTROL
ORDINANCE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has from time to
time established certain fees, penalties and procedures related to the
enforcement of the Animal Control Ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the redemption penalties from impounded animals may
be financially burdensome to many owners; and
WHEREAS, a reduction of the current penalty by 50% with a
waiver of the penalty for the first offense will mitigate this burden
and result in more effective licensing procedures.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
that:
I. The fees, penalties and procedures established in Resolution
92-74 are hereby superseded by this Resolution.
2. The fees, penalties and procedures are revised as follows:
a. Licensing Fees
1. Female or male, dog or cat, initial or renewal
license, not sterilized -- $10.00 per year.
2. Female or male, dog or cat, initial or renewal,
sterilized -- $5.00 per year.
3. Half price to be assessed for issuance of any
Initial license issued for six months or less.
4. All renewals shall be at full price per category.
29
JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 FAGS 655
BOOK 88 FACE 656 -1
5. Additional late charge for licensing after date
required by law -- $5.00.
6. Fee for issuance of duplicate license tag -- $3.00
7. There is no fee required for an animal license for
the year in which the animal is sterilized.
8. There is no license fee required for police dogs
(sheriff and municipal police departments) , sight
assisting dogs and hearing assistance dogs;
however, said dogs are required to be licensed.
9. All licensing fees are to be paid to the
Department of Emergency Services, Animal Control
Division of Indian River County, Florida.
b. Impoundment Fees
$5.00 per diem or part thereof for all animals.
C. Redemption Penalties in addition to Impoundment Fees
First Offense Wavier
Second Offense $15.00
Third Offense $30..00
Fourth Offense and subsequent offenses $60.00
d. Impoundment fees and redemption penalties shall be paid
during business hours at the Office of the Clerk of
the Circuit Court, Indian River County Courthouse,
2145 14th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida. Impoundment
and redemption penalties shall be paid during
non -business hours at a location to be designated by
the Animal Control Director.
e. An owner shall pay all actual expenses or fees
Incurred for which the County has obligated itself for
additional care for quarantine or veterinary services
as an impoundment fee, at time of redemption of the
animal.
30
f. Rabies vaccination prepayment fee for redemption shall
be $15.00 per animal.
g. Civil Penalties for violation of the Code:
( See attached Exhibit "A")
h. All fees, penalties, charges and expenses shall be paid
prior to release of an animal from an impoundment
facility.
The resolution was moved for adoption by Commissioner
Macht and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Adams : and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as
follows:
Chairman Richard N. Bird Aye
Commissioner John W. Tippin Aye
Commissioner Carolyn K. Eggert Aye
Commissioner Fran B. Adams Aye
Commissioner Kenneth R. Macht Aye
The Chairman thereupon declared the resolution duly passed
and adopted this 26 day of January , 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By //
Richard N. Bird
Chairman
Attest
Jeffrey K. Barton, Clerk -
f y lljk� l 6 e tIXIA ;� C
31
JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 FA.cE 65.7
BOOK 88 PAGE 658
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
Administrator Chandler presented the following memo dated
January 19, 1993:
To: James Chandler, Date: January 19, 1993
County Administrator
From: Jack Price, PersonnelQ�_L Sub: Deferred Compensation
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Indian River County has provided a deferred compensation plan (aka
"457 plan") since early 1988 through -The International City
Management Association Retirement Corporation (ICMA). Currently 46
employees are participating in this plan through payroll deduction.
Costs to Indian River County are limited to those resulting from
processing the deductions and distributing information about the
plan.
In October, 1992 ICMA asked that the agreement be modified and
updated as detailed in the attached information. Please recommend
that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to
proceed with executing this contract for Indian River -County.
Thanks for -your assistance. --
Administrator Chandler explained that this is a renewal of the
deferred compensation plan agreement with The International City
Management Association Retirement Corporation (ICMA). Although the
wording was changed somewhat, there were no material changes to the
agreement. Employee participation in the plan is strictly
voluntary.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the modifications and renewal of the contract with
The International City Management Association
Retirement Corporation on the deferred compensation
plan, as recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
32
® r �
TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION DESIGN AT US1/37TH STREET INTERSECTION
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 12,
1993:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
FROM: James W. Davis, P.E.,
Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Traffic Signalization Design at US1/
37th Street Intersection
DATE: January 12, 1993 FILE: 37stdez.agn
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
To add an additional westbound left turn lane at the Barber
Avenue (37th St)/US1 intersection, expansion and possible
redesign of the existing traffic signalization is required. The
County's Consulting engineers-K.F. Lenz Company, has submitted a
proposal to design the needed improvements for a design fee of
$3,500.
ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS
AT the present. time, the Traffic Engineer position is vacant.
The alternatives are as follows: _
Alternative #1
Approve the attached proposal/work order for design services
at a not -to -exceed fee of $3,500.
Alternative #2
Deny approval of the proposal and design the project with
County staff. The project will be delayed approximately
three months until a Traffic Engineer can begin employment
and concentrate on the project.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUNDING
Staff recommends approval of Alternative #1 whereby H.F. Lenz
Company be retained to design the signalization improvements for
a design fee of $3,500. Funding to be from Account #
111-214-541-066.31.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
proposal/work order for design services from H. F.
Lenz Company at a not -to -exceed fee of $3,500, as
recommended by staff.
CONTRACT IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
33
L_ JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 mGE 65
MOM
BOOK 8S PAG- �l®
3RD ANNUAL CITRUS SUNRISE BICYCLE CLASSICIROTARY CLUB OF VERO BEACH
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 12, 1993:
TO: James E. Chandler,
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
FROM: Jeanne Bresett
Traffic Coordina.
SUBJECT: 3rd Annual Citrus Sunrise Bicycle Classic
Rotary Club of Vero Beach
REF LTR: Letter of Request to James E. Chandler
from Jim Thompson, dated 12/22/92
DATE: January 12, 1993
DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS
The Rotary Club of Vero Beach is planning the 3rd Annual Bicycle
Classic. The 100 mile, three lap bicycle race is scheduled for
April 3, 1993. (A separate series of shorter races will be held on
private roadways within Grand Harbor on Sunday, April 4, 1993.)
The race of 100 miles will begin and end at the Vero Beach Senior
High School. The proposed route is the exact same route as the
previous years and the racers will cover the following route three
times:
1) 16/17th Street @ Vero Beach Senior High School over 17th Street
Bridge to SR AlA.
2) North on SR AlA to CR 510
3) West on CR 510 to 58th Avenue
4) South on 58th Avenue to Oslo Road
5) East on Oslo Road to 20th Avenue
6) North on 20th Avenue to Vero Beach Senior High School (16th
Street)
This route proved to be very successful in the previous years. The
moving envelop of bike racers will be ushered by an official lead
vehicle, a Sheriff's car, emergency vehicles, race official
vehicles, Indian River Shores Police vehicles and City of Vero
Beach Police vehicles.
Members of the "HAM" operators- organizations, Vero Beach High
School ROTC units, and uniformed Rotary Club members will be
stationed all along the route to ensure visual and radio contact
and positive traffic control at all times.
The race is scheduled to begin at approximately 8:00 AM and will be
concluded between 11:00 and 11:30 AN.
34
Also, a separate request has been made that is new to this 3rd
Annual event. The Sunrise Rotary Club of Vero Beach is requesting
permission to close Oslo Road just west of 74th Avenue, to 82nd
Avenue & 82nd Avenue to just South of 5th Street SW on the same day
of the race, April 3, 1993 from 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM for a 1 1/2 to
3 mile time trial. Indian River County Traffic Engineering
Division personnel will supply the proper barricades and will
ensure the safe and efficient closing and opening of Oslo Road.
a great deal of advanced media publicity will be employed to inform
all citizens of the race.
ALTERNATIVES & ANALYSIS
- The request for approval from the Indian River County Board of
County Commissioners to hold the 3rd Annual Sunrise Bicycle Classic
on Saturday morning, April 3, 1993 and to close Oslo Road as
proposed above on Saturday afternoon, April 3, 1993 is the proposal
before the Board at this time.
RECOMIENDATIONS & FUNDING
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve
these requests based upon the success of the last two years events
and the fact that the exact same route (with the exception of the
closure of Oslo Road) and procedures are to be followed this year.
Liaison activities will be maintained between the race committee,
Indian River County Sheriff's Department, City of Vero Beach Police
Department and Indian River County Traffic Engineering.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, the Board unanimously approved
the request of The Rotary Club of Vero Beach to hold
the 3rd Annual Bicycle Classic on April 3, 1993, as
recommended by staff.
35
JAN 26 1993 bou 88 FnE 661
BOOK 88 PAu 662
MISCELLANEOUS INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. PHASE III - KIMBALL -LLOYD.
INC. RELEASE OF RETAINAGE
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 18, 1993:
TO: James Chandler
County Administrator
THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E.
Public Works Director
FROM: Roger D. Cain, P.
County Engineer
SUBJECT: Miscellaneous Intersection Improvements, Phase III
Kimball -Lloyd, Inc. Release of Retainage
DATE: January 18, 1993
Kimball -Lloyd, Inc. has a Professional Services Agreement for the design of several intersections
for Indian River County. Over the last two years these intersections have been completed, except
for one intersection, 43rd Avenue and 41 st Street, which is still under design and has right-of-way
acquisition involved The following intersections were included in the Miscellaneous Intersection
Improvements Phase III Contract:
1.
43rd Avenue and 45th Street
2.
43rd Avenue and 26th Street
3.
43rd Avenue and 12th Street
4.
43rd Avenue and 8th Street
5.
20th Avenue and 8th Street
6.
43rd Avenue and 41 st Street
At the present time, work is complete on all but 43rd Avenue and 41 st Street, which is
approximately 80% to 90016 complete.
Since Kimball -Lloyd, Inc. has completed all of the other intersections in this contract, they have
requested that the retainage on those intersections be released according to the attached sheet
showing the value of the contract broken down among the intersections. To date the county has paid
$66,765.15 on the contract, which has an adjusted contract total including Amendments 1 through
3 of $82,258.50. The consultant is claiming that the value of the work done so far on this contract
is $76,886.55 and the county concurs with that claim. lye county would also agree that since the
other intersections have been completed and have been constructed, or substantially constructed, that
the engineer is entitled to receive the retainage on the amount of the completed intersections.
36
Chairman Bird asked if there are any plans to shorten the
duration of the signals at 26th Street and U.S. 1, and Director
Davis explained that the County was not involved in setting it up
because it is a City signal.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
the release of the retainage to Kimball -Lloyd, Inc.
in the amount of $5,391.39 on • the completed
intersections, and retain 10% of the amount on the
uncompleted 43rd Avenue and 41st Street value of the
contract, as recommended by staff.
REGIONAL LANDFILL LIFT STATION CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 14, 1993:
DATE: JANUARY 14, 1993
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILI Y SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F.
AND STAFFED_ CAPITAL S ENGINEER
BY: DEP AR UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: REGIONAL LANDFILL LIFT STATION CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
INDIANRIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. US -90 -15 -CS
BACKGROUND
On September 15, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved a contract with GBS Excavating, Inc., for the
construction of the above -referenced project (see attached agenda
item and minutes). Due to changes in the project requirements
initiated by the landfill staff, several modifications to the design
have been made (see attached change order balance exhibit).
ANALYSIS
The original contract amount was $81,230.00; the proposed change
order is for a reduction of $7,500.00. Approval of this change
order will lower the contract amount to $73,730.00. Please also
note there is no contract time change associated with this change
order (see attached change order).
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners approve Change Order No. 1 with GBS
Excavating, Inc., for a contract reduction of $7,500.00.
37
6 1993BOOK 88 PAGE 663
Fr'_
JAN 2 6 I3 BOOK 88 Fars 664 -7
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order No. 1 with GBS Excavating, Inc., for a
contract reduction of $7,500.00, as recommended by
staf f .
CHANGE ORDER IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
PROPOSED CHANGE ORDERS - CONSTRUCTION OF CR -512 COMMERCIAL NODE -
WATER AND WASTEWATER
The Board reviewed the following memo dated January 14, 1993:
DATE: JANUARY 14, 1993
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILI SERVICES
PREPARED WILLIAM F. cCAIN
AND STAFFED_ CAPITAL PR C INEER
BY: DEPAR UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: PROPOSED CHANGE ORDERS - CONSTRUCTION OF THE C.R. 512
COMMERCIAL NODE - WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE
IRC PROJECT NUMBERS: US -92 -24 -CS AND UW -92 -23 -DS
BACKGROUND
On August , 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved the design and construction of master -planned
water and sewer lines to the intersection of C.R. 512 and *I-95
(commercial node). (See attached agenda item and minutes.) The
project is currently in the permitting stage with DER and is on
schedule. (See attached cost summary and schedule.)
ANALYSIS
As can be seen from the attached schedule, if standard bidding and
construction procedures are utilized, construction could not begin
until March 30, 1993 at the earliest. With a 120 -day construction
time, this process could be shortened by ± 3 months if change orders
to existing contracts were utilized. The original cost estimates
for the water and sewer service, respectively, were $684,720.00 and
$250,000.00. We feel that negotiated change orders to the existing
contracts (which terminate at the beginning of this project, see
attached maps) with Boyce Company (water) and Owl and Associates
(sewer) would save the County both time and money. We have
negotiated the change order costs (see attached) as follows:
Sewer
Water
38
$195,223.00
$435,743.02
Both of these amounts are substantially below our original
estimates. The Utilities Department requests authorization to
proceed with these change -orders as outlined above to expedite the
construction of this project.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff of the Department of Utility Services requests approval of
the attached change orders as outlined above from the Board of
County Commissioners to proceed with construction of these projects.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Tippin, the Board unanimously approved
Change Order No. 1 with Boyce and Company in the
amount of $435,743.02, and Change Order No. 2 with
Owl & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $195,223.00,
as set forth in staff's recommendation.
CHANGE ORDERS ARE ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT - PINEVIEW PARR 8/D, RIVENBARK S/D, AND 15TH
AVENUE, WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 7
The Board reviewed the following memo dated December 30, 1992:
DATE: DECEMBER 30, 1992
TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: TFJUWCE G. PINTO
DIRECTOR OF UTILIeIMIRVICES
PREPARED TERRY H. DRUM 1#P
AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES
SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT - PROJECT NO. 1
PINEVIEW PARR SUBDIVISION, RIVENBARK SUBDIVISION, AND
15TH AVENUE
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BID NO. 91-113
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PROJECT NO. UW -92 -18 -DS
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 7
BACKGROUND
On August 6, 1991, the Board of County Commissioners approved the
award of the labor contract bid to Driveways, Inc., Bid No. 91-113.
(See attached minutes.) The Department of Utility Services proposes
to use this labor contract to replace the distribution system within
the above subject area. This is in response to the continuing
problems of rusting and low pressure with the existing galvanized
water lines.
39
JAN 26 1993 800K 88 FACE 665
BOOK 88 FACE 666
On July 7, 1992, the Indian River County Board of County
Commissioners approved three surveying proposals from Masteller,
Moler and Reed to obtain data for the following projects:
Project No. 1 - Pineview Park Subdivision and Rivenbark Subdivision
Project No. 2 - Cooks Subdivision, Glen Acres, and Ixora Park
Subdivision
Project No. 3 - Vero Mall vicinity, Ridgewood Subdivision, South
Side Park Subdivision vicinity, and Casa Rio
Subdivision vicinity
Surveying has been completed, and Project No. 1 is designed for
construction. Project No. 1 is comprised of the replacement of
existing 2 -inch galvanized water main with approximately 950
linear feet of 4 -inch PVC water main and 6000 linear feet of 2 -inch
PVC water main.
ANALYSIS
The cost of the labor to construct the 4 -inch and 2 -inch PVC water
mains under the labor contract is $89,606.44 (see attached Work
Authorization No. 7 with Driveways, Inc.). The pipe, valves, and
fittings will be supplied by the County at a cost of $16,684.08.
In-house engineering, inspection, and administration costs are
estimated to be $10,630.00.
The construction of these replacement water lines is -a part of a
continuing effort by the Department to replace galvanized water
lines in Indian River County. Funding for this project will be from
renewal and replacement funds.
The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners execute the subject agreement, which
approves Work Authorization No. 7 to construct Project No. 1 with
Driveways, Inc., for the amount of $89,606.44 to replace an
estimated total of 6950 linear feet of water main and authorizes
expenditure of $27,314.08 for materials and in-house support, for a
total project cost of $116,920.52.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved
Work Authorization No. 7 with Driveways, Inc. in the
amount of $116,920.52, as recommended by staff.
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 7 IS ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD
40
REVIEW OF OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX
Assistant County Attorney Terry O'Brien commented from the
following memo dated January 7, 1993:
TO: James E. Chandler, County Administrator
FROM: Terrence P. O'Brien, Assistant Co ty Attorney-Tfa
Joseph A. Baird, Budget Directo
DATE: January 7, 1993`�j
RE: Review of Occupational License Tax
I. Background
Indian River County has for a number of years imposed an occupational
license tax on businesses and professions doing business in the County.
In the 1974 edition of the Indian River County Code this tax was set
forth in Chapter 15 "Licensing and License Tax". A new code edition
was begun and Chapter 15 became Chapter 207. The transition to the
new Code was largely editorial; however, there appeared to be areas
where the tax was not equal. Professional corporations and
partnerships paid an occupational license tax as well as the individual
or individuals who made up the corporation or partnership. In the case
of the real estate agents they were not required to pay an occupational
license tax because they lacked the same independence as a lawyer or
other professional in that they are required by law to work for a
broker. These matters were addressed by the Board of County
Commissioners previously. However, the Board of County
Commissioners directed the staff to review, in depth, the entire
occupational license tax area and report back.
II. Statutory and Operational Background
Counties and municipalities are authorized by the "Local Occupational
License Tax Act" (Chapter 205 F.S.) to charge a fee for the privilege
of engaging in or managing any business, profession, or occupation
within its jurisdiction. This fee is unrelated to any fee or license paid
to any board, commissioner or officer for permits, registration,
examination or inspection which are regulatory in nature. The
occupational license tax fee is in addition, but not in lieu of, any
regulatory fee.
A fee or tax may be imposed for the purpose of regulation or revenue.
When the purpose is regulation, the fee should include the expense of
issuing the license, the cost of' necessary inspection and surveillance
connected with the business or profession licensed, and all incidental
expenses that are likely to be imposed upon the public in consequence
of the business or profession licensed. When the purpose
the license tax payment gives the right to carry on the
profession without any further condition. It may include
precedent such as a state license for a lawyer, doctor,
broker, and other such regulatory licensed activities.
41
is revenue,
business or
a condition
real estate
JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 RGE 667 J
r JAN 261993
BOOK 88 Pmu,E 668
Occupational license taxes established pursuant to the authority
contained in the "Local Occupational License Tax Act" ( Chapter 205
F . S .) are strictly for revenue purposes and have no regulatory
function.
The imposition of these revenue taxes usually occurs at both the
County and municipal level. For example, an attorney practicing law in
the City of Vero Beach must pay to the City of Vero Beach an
occupation license tax of $35.00 and must pay to Indian River County
an occupational license tax of $30.00. The distribution of this tax is
often overlooked when considering the efficacy of such a tax. In ' the
example given, the City of Vero Beach retains the entire $35.00 that it
collects. The $30.00 collected by the County must be apportioned
between the unincorporated area of the County and the incorporated
municipalities, including the City of Vero Beach, located therein by a
ratio derived by dividing their respective populations by the population
of the County. The general perception appears to be that the City
retains its $35.00 and the County retains its $30.00. When the reality
of the situation is that the County is imposing this tax for the benefit
of the municipalities as well as the County. In effect, the
municipalities are taxing the citizens twice, once through the municipal
tax and by sharing the County's tax.
III. Revenue Generated by the County Tax
1. Total Revenue for the year ending 91/92:
2. Cost of Collection:
3. Net Revenue:
4. Distribution:
a. Unincorporated Area
b. City of Vero Beach
C. City of Sebastian
d. City of Fellsmere
e. Town of Indian River Shores
f. Town of Orchid
IV. Areas of Disparate Treatment
$213,644.93
$ 2,741.66
Q16;9036 a 7
$1349341.49
$ 579699.00
$ 109099.00
$ 4,140.43
$ 4,473.72
$ 149.55
Under Chapter 205 F.S. any tax shall be based on reasonable
classifications and shall be uniform throughout any class. The following
categories and the tax associated therewith do not appear to meet this
criteria.
Section
207.24
Circus, Traveling Shows,
Tents & Side Shows
$225 1 each day
Section
207.25
Traveling Medicine Shows
$75
Section
207.28
Dance Halls
$225 3
Section
207.30
Fortune Tellers, Clairvoyants
$300
Section
207.37
Pawnbrokers
$337.50
Section
207.39
Permanent Exhibits
$225
1 May operate a side show for $30.00 each side show
Plus the fee in Section 207.24 if there is entertainment
3 One night only $150
42
V. Comparison of Ordinance
The staff has reviewed the ordinancre I of St. Lucie County, Brevard
County, Martin County, City of Vero Beach.
The Ordinances are essentially the same some have very high taxes like
theactivities in IV above. The similarity is, of course, dictated by
the . requirements of Chapter 205 F.S. The tax itself will differ from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction because the taxes in place on October 1, 1971
are the benchmark for the present day tax figures.
VI. Recommendation
1. The activities set forth in IV be taxed at the same rate as
retail businesses $30.00
2. No other changes are recommended to the occupational license
tax at this time.
Attorney O'Brien advised that it is probably unconstitutional
to charge some entities more than others.
ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by
Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously authorized
staff to reduce the tax on the activities listed in
the above memorandum to $30.00, the same rate
charged retail businesses, as recommended by staff.
INFORMATION REGARDING HERITAGE VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARR COURT ORDER
Attorney Vitunac presented the following memo dated January
22, 1983:
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
�1
FROM: Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney
DATE: January 22, 1993
RE: HERITAGE VILLAGE MOBILE ROME PARR
Last Wednesday Terry Pinto, Harry Asher, and I represented Indian River
County at a motion for temporary injunction filed by Heritage Village
Homeowners' Association asking the court to prohibit the Utilities
Deaprtment from cutting off service to tenants with overdue bills. The
hearing lasted approximately five hours, and Judge Ranarek kindly stayed
into the evening hours to finish the hearing on an emergency basis.
43
JAN 261993 BOCK 88 FAIL
r JAN 261993
BOOK 88 FACE 670
Attached is the order of the Judge which holds that Indian River County
may proceed to collect unpaid utility bills by its normal procedure,
i.e., if the Heritage village bills are not paid by Monday, January 25,
1993, at 5:00 p.m., then the County Utility services Department may
proceed to disconnect service from those units which have not paid.
The Judge has required no bonds or escrow accounts and this matter will
be treated in the same manner as other County customers are treated.
The attorney for the homeowners telephoned me and indicated that the
vast majority of the residents would be paying their over -due bills on
Monday, January 24, before the turn-off date.
Pursuant to the motion from the Board, amounts owing the County from
May, 1992, up to November, 1992, need not be paid to avoid a service
disconnection. These amounts will continue to accrue penalty and
interest costs and must be paid by the loser of the lawsuit between MLH
Properties and the Heritage Village homeowners when that is determined.
Attorney Vitunac distributed a copy of Judge Kanarek's order
dated January 22, 1993 to the Board and related that this was a
victory for the County's policy of treating everyone the same in
turning off meters when their bills were overdue.
Commissioner Eggert asked, and Attorney Vitunac advised that
all the residents of Heritage Village Mobile Home Park received
proper notice and have paid their utility bills.
Chairman Bird congratulated Attorney Vitunac and the other
staff members who were involved in this for a job well done. No
action from the Board was required.
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL REPORT
Commissioner Tippin reported that Commissioner Adams and he
recently attended several Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
(TCRPC) meetings and concluded that there is too much layering of
state bureaucracy. For example, TCRPC staff recommended denial of
a Comprehensive Plan amendment that was previously approved by the
Board. Their reason for recommending denial was that the subject
property is located midway between Vero Beach and Sebastian, and
they thought it would create unfair competition for those
municipalities which are attempting to develop commercial areas.
Commissioners Tippin and Adams objected, and the TCRPC staff's
recommendation was denied. Commissioner Tippin gave another
example of some proposed improvements in Fort Pierce Harbor. The
TCRPC voted the improvements down 11-7, after St. Lucie County
spent two years of planning.
Commissioner Eggert commented that she has had very deep
feelings about this ever since she chaired the TCRPC about three
years ago when the new Comprehensive Plan was being developed. It
was necessary for everyone from outside Palm Beach County to attend
the meetings in order to get fair treatment. Commissioner Eggert
44
felt that the TCRPC is too strong and has gotten out of hand, and
that it is unduly influenced by Palm Beach County.
Commissioner Adams conveyed that it is frustrating to listen
to the misinformation. Indian River County has good staff that
gives the Board the information it needs to make decisions. The
TCRPC staff hands out a packet that includes only information
supporting their position.
Commissioner Eggert related that when the TCRPC staff is
challenged in an open meeting, they provide more complete
information.
Commissioner Macht felt that most of the TCRPC staff's efforts
are directed towards empire -building and wondered if the people in
our county know that we are required to make a direct contribution
of $36,000, in addition to money they receive from the State.
Commissioner Adams mentioned that their travel expenses are
astronomical. On top of that, TCRPC staff members recommended
denial on the proposed rezoning north of Ocean Spray without even
visiting the site, which Commissioner Adams thought was totally
irresponsible.
Further discussion ensued, and -the Board members agreed that
the TCRPC is an expense to the County that serves no useful purpose
and ought to be dismantled.
Commissioner Macht related that State Representative Charles
Sembler agrees that it ought to be dismantled.
Commissioner Eggert felt that if the State does not dismantle
the TCRPC, Palm Beach County should be removed from the group
because it is too powerful and the smaller counties are unable to
compete.
The Board discussed the possibility of returning authority to
review Developments of Regional Impact (DRI) back to counties, and
Attorney Vitunac advised that when he went to the meeting in
Jacksonville last month and asked the speaker on the DRI issue
whether there were any plans to eliminate the regional planning
councils, the speaker begged off on the issue. However, everybody
in the audience started applauding, so apparently it is a state-
wide feeling.
Community Development Director Bob Keating reported that he
received a copy of the Environmental Lands Management Study (ELMS
III) report to the TCRPC. The report contained 174 specific
recommendations. Although it does not recommend completely
disbanding the regional planning councils, it recommends revising
their responsibilities and eliminating DRI by 1995 for counties
with populations over 100,000, and counties with populations under
100,000 would be given the option of using or not using the DRI.
45
JAN 26
�9�� - BOOK 88 PAGE671
r
JAM 2619�'�
BOOK 88 FAGr 672,
Regional planning councils would no longer be regulatory bodies and
would have no authority to set level of service standards or other
binding criteria on local governments. The Advisory Committee on
Intergovernmental Report (ACIR) also reviewed regional planning
councils, which fall under the sunset law. The ACIR and the ELMS
III both recommended that regional planning councils not be sunset,
but that their duties and responsibilities be changed.
Commissioner Bird felt that diluting their responsibilities
will not reduce their staff by even one person, and we still will
have the money -gobbling monster that we have today.
Commissioner Macht stressed that this session of the
legislature will be dealing with this topic so we really need to
act as soon as we can.
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by
Commissioner Adams, that the Board write to all of
our state representatives and all the committee
members who are dealing directly with this issue and
say we are very concerned about the regulatory power
of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council,
that we think it is not properly handled and we can
do a much better job working with neighboring
counties, as we already do, and we would like to see
regional planning councils either sunset or if they
are not sunset to at least give up their regulatory
power to local government and separate us from Palm
Beach County.
Under discussion, Commissioner Macht emphasized that we should
not be forced to associate with Palm Beach County because we have
nothing in common with them.
Chairman Bird directed Attorney Vitunac to get together with
Commissioner Eggert in preparing an appropriate letter.
THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION.
It was voted on and carried unanimously.
46
EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT
Chairman Bird announced that immediately upon adjournment the
Board would reconvene sitting as the Commissioners of the Emergency
Services District.
Those Minutes are being prepared separately.
There being no further business, on Motion duly made, seconded
and carried, the Board adjourned at 10:15 A.M.
ATTEST:
J. Barton, Clerk Richard N. Bird, Chairman
47
d
JAN 26 1993 BOOK 88 PAGE 673